skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Other than those two, the Australian and Norweigan (Kongen Befaller) are great, though early on in Norway's seasons there'll be a fair number of repeat tasks from the UK version. Same for Denmark (Stormester), perhaps more so.

Portugal's is pretty decent, though the format runs two hours per episode. I also thought the Croation version (Direktor Svemira) was decent, though the individual cast members lean hard into their own stereotypes (Lidija as the personification of the male gaze, for example).

Sweden's is really popular, but I personally didn't care for it at all.

As with the US version, it's probably best to pretend that Spain and Belgium's didn't happen.
this looks really cool! i'm gonna have to look into building one of these, the kids would love it!
Just wanted to say, that is an excellent username.
> That sounds like the worst of both worlds... a tiny cramped cube with no social interaction or impromptu collaboration....

But, that's why they have doors, which can be opened or closed, or left slightly ajar, all of which can be used to indicate your willingness to receive visitors. And why must "private office" mean "tiny cramped cube?" Do you not imagine there being any common areas where people can sit and work?

Sure, if your idea of "private offices" is "tiny, cramped cubes," I get it. I had an office in grad school I almost never visited, much less used, because it was the size of a walk-in closet and was assigned to me and two other students. But I'm thinking more like the professors' offices, where you can have a couch in there, and a desk, and a window, and some bookshelves, and go down the hall to get some coffee or sit in the commons room, etc.
FIFA used AI to identify and report 300 online abusers to police
Who's laughing about the literature degree now
a murderer on the stand, “why are you looking at my case? what about all the other people who murdered someone and haven’t been prosecuted yet?”
FWIW, the “Cost of Terminating Each SMS” is what confused me.
"Driven by frontend requirements" is how approximately all APIs in the world are developed. The problem GraphQL exposes, and makes extremely punishing when you ignore it, is that of poor communication of requirements.

Put it this way: you _could_ build a GraphQL resolver by means of mirroring your database schema or service structure, and let frontend engineers play in that sandbox while patching up holes. This would have the exact same result as building a REST API service that proxies requests to a SOA without understanding the performance or stability impact. Or the exact same result as exposing multiple REST services that must all be hit to render a single screen on the frontend, except you push the blocking to clients, which is not a proper solution if you care about the energy usage you don't pay for.

In all of these cases, the common thread is that the backend and frontend teams aren't working together and thinking of the entire product as a system instead of a frontend/backend split. GraphQL forces you to reason about the entire system and not a series of API calls, which can obviously cause problems with siloed teams.

This means I disagree with folks who attribute the power of GraphQL to "frontend-driven" APIs. Your frontend and backend is your product, so ultimately you must reckon with the boundary layer between the two.
Why rabbits? Towards a better, floofier world
I don't have experience with text/nlp problems, but some degree of automation/assistance in labeling is a fairly common practice in computer vision. If you have a certain task where the ML model gets you 90% there, then you can use that as a starting point and have a human fix the remaining 10%. (Of course, this should be done in a way that the overall effort is lower than labeling from scratch, which is partially a UI problem). If your model is so good that it completely outperforms humans (at least for now, before data drift kicks in) then that's a good problem to have, assume your model evaluation is sane.
The nameplate on the door.

Seriously, my office in grad school was a glorified closet. I never used it and rarely visited it.
She right.
"Stealing rent" is an...interesting position. If not just because it seems to imply that housing is not a human right
Telegram need that too
Intel agrees to invest $25B in Israeli chip manufacturing plants
Not that I'm aware of. The sendfile path is our hottest path, and that's already improved immensely by async sendfile.
Saying "SR-71" is like a cheat code that completely inverts HN's skepticism to 100% credulity.
The dingo ate your baby!
https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv4-special-registry/...

What is 233.252.0 0/24 reserved for? I don't immediately recognize it and didn't see it on the iana special registry.
Who ever said it was impossible for an LLM to repeat things from the training set verbatim? It would be very impressive if it somehow divined the algorithm for generating valid Windows keys and produced one by itself, but this is just ChatGPT doing the same job as Google except slower and more expensive, while normally failing to actually produce the information because it erroneously triggers a "request for illegal content" guardrail, and finally it gets bamboozled into ignoring its own guardrail against providing illegal content. Which part of this is supposed to be impressive?
"Economics of new nuclear plants are heavily influenced by their capital cost, which accounts for at least 60% of their LCOE"[1] and "fuel costs account for about 28% of a nuclear plant's operating expenses."[2] So 28% of 40% gives about 10%.

A lot of that fuel cost is probably fabrication and enrichment, which aren't trivial. But let's say it's the raw ore cost, in which case five times raises total cost by 40% for conventional reactors.

But fast reactors use 1% as much uranium ore as conventional reactors, so it'd be 1% of 10%, times five means seawater extraction for fast reactor fuel would account for about half a percent of the cost of power.

[1] https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/economic-aspec...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_nuclear_power_pla...
Seems to be working though. Some subs are folding despite initial strong conviction
So you are criticising RISC-V not compared to its actual x86 and Arm competition -- where overflow checking is also not free and is seldom used -- but against some imaginary ideal CPU that doesn't exist or no one uses because it's so slow.
It’s not a drone I’d somebody is inside is it, flying it.
The Internet was a place where people shared knowledge. Now it is a giant ad for shopping.

People were given the sum of human knowledge and instead of becoming more self sufficient they have become more reliant. Take for instance repair cafes, whose goal isn't to repair stuff for people but to teach people that things can be repaired which if you think about it for a bit is mind boggling.

Instead of taking advantage of knowledge and experience humanity has doubled down on denial, hatred, superstition and outright craziness. Witness the response to COVID and current political polarization happening everywhere.

Instead of sharing information, now a search of the Internet find SEO gibberish, scams, fake reviews and all manner of horrors that we never expected possible in the 80s and 90s from the Internet.
In addition to what's already been said, these keys can be used to change SKU on an existing install of Windows. For example, if you have Windows 11 Pro but your volume licensing supports Enterprise, you can go into the activation settings and enter the generic key for Windows 11 Enterprise to upgrade to it on the fly.
Does any tech conference not have sponsorships in some form? I know small conferences, unconferences, etc. and they all seem to rely on sponsors--maybe primarily so to have low/no conference prices.

The $495 ticket price in the article also isn't especially high in this day and age but I don't consider it especially cheap either. Definitely a destination conference sort of price which has implications relative to cheap and local.

Also of course life can get in the way of speakers (who are typically not paid at tech events unless they're some non-vendor "draw"). If anyone wanted me to sign some contract with consequences if something came up I'd laugh.
Why? Do you not have an internet connection?
The verb/noun stuff I understand was the UI for the astronauts (the DSKY). There was also the native instruction set for the CPU as well as an interpreter with a richer instruction set built on top of that, and they used this to more easily write complex navigation programs. Wikipedia mentions some of this at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer around the phrase "virtual machine." I'm not sure it being interpreted code would aid in field reprogrammability, since it would have been woven into the rope memory just like the rest of the software.
I was specifically talking about AF_INET dgram sockets, not AF_UNIX; I saw that it wasn't pledged and assumed that was by design (since having that and sendto would be extremely unsafe, since you could connect to abstract unix sockets). If you want to use an inherited unix socket for the blacklisting, you should use SOCK_STREAM unix sockets instead so you can't sendto. Even allowing localhost UDP sockets isn't safe to expose to a sandbox, IMO, since Linux programs fairly often expose privileged operations over those and have no way of knowing the client is supposed to be sandboxed and rejected.
I have to switch providers even to do that. For now Tailscale is my friend.
What "quality checks" do you propose for office work that would work better than asking people how they're doing?
Agree

I was shocked when I read the instructions and realized I had to build a secondary container.

On top of this, there are some keycloak options (parameters and env vars) which are valid only at the time of compiling a new container, where others are valid only at runtime
Tell the owners that the train might derail and that you wont be on it when it does, so they either have to slow down or risk crashing.
JPEG is lossy though - I'm pretty sure these theorems only really apply to lossless compression, because if you allow lossy compression you can do all kinds of things to different t types of data (pictures being the classic case of permitting pretty lossy compression without much noticeable quality degradation)
If the housing supply weren't artificially limited, this might make sense. But it makes more sense to remove the regulations preventing more housing from being built instead.
I'm not much of a focused writer, so other than comments on HN, and private communications. Not really.

If it's on topic, I'm happy to answer questions. And my email is in my profile.

On this topic, I guess the big learning if you use phone numbers for verification is to use multiple providers, and build a system that automatically chooses providers in real time based on success. They all have incidents, and they all have destinations that work better and worse. I don't usually mention suppliers by name unless it was clearly public, they put us in their SEC forms by name, so I think it's fair.

My "favorite" incidents are when one provider has a major incident, and several others have minor incidents that correspond exactly. This is because most of the aggregators are interconnected, and sometimes it makes more sense for them to send through another aggregator than directly (they don't tend to have direct routes for all carriers, regardless of what they claim).

If you use voice codes, I also recommend working to make the voice spacing sound good. Remembering 6 digits from a call isn't super easy; it's better if you make it sounds like two groups of three or maybe three groups of two. It's not totally obvious how to do that either; smashing audio files together doesn't sound great. You've got to adjust the silence between voice samples.
If you have 1, maybe 2 front ends then this is flat out laziness.

The front end arguement makes sense for someone like Facebook who has many different front ends and integrations. It’s unmaintainable to try do this any other way.
>Successful tech entrepreneurs at first mostly stayed out of politics. Around 2010, they were generally associated with the left, as Bill Gates began to be involved in areas like climate change and education reform. Then came the Great Awokening. Before that point, a reasonable person could ignore politics and assume that the people in charge were mentally stable and knew what they were doing.

I wouldn't go that far. There were plenty of other breaks with reality in American life before the Great Awokening. For example, the whole saga of how US elites decided to invade Iraq in 2003 and managed to get a pretty large subset of the US public to go along with it.

There is also the whole decades-long war on drugs, which is based on the idea that it is ok for the government to decide what substances a man can and cannot put into his own body and, oddly, is most heavily supported by the same people who think that it is not ok for the government to prevent a man from owning firearms.

And then there is the US' support for all kinds of brutal dictators overseas during the Cold War while preaching about liberty at home.

So yes, the Great Awokening is an example of a break with reality in US psychopolitical life, but it is far from the first one.
80% of the world's silicon and magnesium comes from Russia/China. US can't make the stealth coating on the F-35 without it. Can't control where the big bang placed mineral deposits...

*Technically silicon is everywhere but until the US and EU are willing to rip up their riverbeds to get at it, it's as good as nonexistent there.
Apparently the waiting list for BESM-6 computers is already 19 years long.
Does any know any more details about this? It's a fun tidbit that gets a link/article on social media every few weeks, but it's never anything more than a tidbit. "The US needed titanium for the SR-71. The only supplier of titanium was the Soviet Union. So the US bought it from the Soviet Union through a shell corporation." But that's it. It's those 3 facts and only those three facts expressed in anywhere between one sentence and 10 paragraphs.

They never mention that the #1 worldwide producer of titanium is Australia. They never mention that South Africa produces a lot as well. They rarely mention the name of the shell company. (Red Sea something?) They don't talk about whether alternatives were considered.

I just feel like there's probably an interesting story there, but we never hear it, just the tidbit that can fit in the headline.
And like Apple, will they still have the best margins in the business? I'd also guess yes.
You just tripped my "had a desk next to the ping pong table" PTSD.
Unfortunately, it's a natural result of Discord moving from being a useful little service to a "platform" with investors and needing to constantly be updated with useless nonsense to keep the "value" of the product alive.

Realistically, once everything was up and running, and they had moved their DB over to their current platform [1], someone should have taken the keys away from them and just said "Discord is done, it's complete". We likely wouldn't be having this much of a problem with useful information being hidden away behind Discord server invite URLs.

[1] https://discord.com/blog/how-discord-stores-trillions-of-mes...
At this point I’d rather see the how to fix it when things go wrong demo. Of course very few tools can show that either because it’s messy or it’s to hard to show all the pieces.
> I guess this is the same kind of question as "how do you know you don't live in the matrix?".

Not really. The canonical example of tech that does benefit from the network effect is the telephone. The more people on the telephone network, the more useful it becomes. A phone network that silently replaces each node with LLM agents would soon become apparent as when you catch up with the people you thought you were calling in the flesh, discrepancies will start to emerge.

But Reddit (and HN for that matter) tries to hide the existence of people. While I assume you are human, I don't really know. I don't know your name. I don't know what you look like. I don't know where you live. I know nothing. And, frankly, I don't need to because you are not part of the experience. That you are (probably) human is just an implementation detail. Whether you are human or an LLM is completely immaterial. What human participation there might be when using a forum is done so in solitude. It is not a social experience.
Pretty much everything north of ~Flint is good if you just want a house by a lake, The UP especially so. Wisconsin and Minnesota have fewer lakes, but they are also good, and have better roads. If you want to go out on the Great Lakes, skiing/snowboarding (on dunes?), hiking, kayaking, hunting, or fishing, narrow down your choices accordingly and take a visit to check it out.
Appreciate the comment. Saved me a click.

Any better resources on fine-tuning LLMs?
For some unknown reason both PDF links

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.11279

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2212/2212.11279.pdf

get automatically replaced (it's not redirection) with the abstract webpage upon submission.

The references section, along with some footnotes, take up about 60% of the document.
GNOME has a lot of features that macOS is missing by default, like dragging windows anywhere by holding a key, compose key support, per-app volume mixing, and searching through open windows as you type.

In what ways do you feel that GNOME is more limited than the macOS desktop?
My guess would be that the entities short-sighted enough to still be using those languages in 2023 are also ones short sighed enough to not invest in the training to preemptively hire juniors without the skillset to train them up.
> The fundamental deficiency with our society is that we value talking about X more than performing/implementing X.

I am so guilty of this. I spend so much time on here and other platforms just mindlessly consuming and participating in discussions about software engineering, new technology, best practices, etc.. So much so that I basically barely program anymore (except for my job where none of this information is important for irrelevant and complex reasons).

I have ideas and projects I want to work on, but I think my brain has be rewired over my life to the point that I get the sense of reward of finishing something by actually just procrastinating/reading and not working towards whatever goal.

It's like information sugar -- sugars are easiest for the body to convert into energy. The body likes sugar because it can get "what it wants" while expending the least amount of effort. My brain has apparently has implemented the same logic when it comes personal projects.
> If they weren't particularly interesting in competing in aerial surveillance then it may have been seen as worth the money they got in return.

You really bend it to fit your narrative. Not sure what the Soviets believed, but no sane country would want to help their adversaries to achieve stronger offensive capabilities, which surveillance would no doubt help.

Bribery though, that wouldn't be too outrageous. I don't see why CIA want to hide that fact though. Bribery along with blackmailing are common spying tools.
You’re somewhat right, I didn’t wander into unfamiliar areas by myself at night, but I don’t do that at home either. I spent a good deal of time out past sundown, just not meandering out of curiosity.

I tried to make it clear that I specifically did walk around/through the tenderloin.

And yes, there was one street—in the week we spent there commuting, going out, visiting w/ friends—that I noted I’d avoid in future.

I didn’t mean to assert that crime in SF is a small set of isolated incidents. My hope was to share my own positive experience but avoid sounding dismissive of the real pains experienced by individuals.
How would vertical integration be related to migrating the iOS and Android apps to using GraphQL?
Reminds me of Conway's Law, which states that the structure of your systems will mirror the structure of your organization.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_law
I'm told that Microsoft and OpenAI have a partnership, but only a very few people at Microsoft have access to the source code and other information that OpenAI has. That means even Microsoft doesn't know the details of what is going on with ChatGPT.
We used keycloak for openid identity provider as well. It is fine to setup keycloak once. But it is painful share the setup with other engineers.

For local development, we end up using dex (https://dexidp.io). When we need support group/role, we use dex and glauth(https://glauth.github.io). Both dex and glauth can be configured with yaml files. We just created a few yaml files and a docker compose file, every engineer can be brought up the whole environment in a few seconds.

Also https://www.authelia.com and https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik look pretty promising, if you need more advanced features from them.
Bingo.

The problem is, so would "management," and they're the ones who do the hiring.
My favourite is the nineteen meetings it took to convince a security team to approve the use of unencrypted HTTP for the certificate revocation list endpoint.

No amount of RFC references, live demos of “see, www.google.com does it with HTTP also” would tick the checkbox.

“We have a security standard, sir.” over and over, for months.
Thus is how some video encoding algorithms ans the like sort of work, iirc - you encode interface differences under the assumption that any particular part of the screen isn't likely to change much.

Encoding algorithms end up getting specialised for particular types of data because different data exhibits different patterns.
Every city thinks they could be the "next silicon valley" because how hard can it be? Just need some office buildings and internet cables.
why the machine can’t learn that something is fake like person
Person learn thing base on thing that we see, listen, we know something is fake , why can’t machine.
It’s a wired question
Cybersecurity Law, Policy, and Institutions (version 3.1)
who is upvoting these low effort rehashes of tweets? someone should ban toms hardware for this
There is now published research demonstrating that small models (LLaMA 7B) surpass GPT-4’s performance when fine-tuned on specific tasks.
Programming Languages and Law: A Research Agenda
If I develop and produce a fertilizer which doubles yields for a particular crop, that's uncaptured pie. Plain and simple.
Reference to the 1980 case where the mother wrongly went to prison on top of losing her child, mostly because her claim was too memeable.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dingo_ate_my_baby
Actually, that's plenty of time for meaningful evolution in humans too. Lots of changes in general distributions in response to environmental influences occur in that time.
I will never understand HDR. A friend has tried to explain it many times to me, but I always fail to get it. A display just has so much dynamic range (from full light off to full light on). HDR can't give you more range, so what does it actually do?

The only thing I've seen it do is override my brightness setting to make my screen go to full brightness when I've set it lower.
I won't say it's trivial but smartphones, GPS, Google Translate, etc. have made things much easier since I first traveled to Japan maybe 15 years ago. Yes, iPhones work. And, while things are harder when you get more rural, traveling is pretty straightforward at least between and in cities.
Oh they could make it work. But what they actually want is to funnel people away from 3rd party apps an into the official one.

They could have just removed the API, but instead they set it to a ridiculous price that no app dev can afford. That way they get to shift the blame to those devs and say "see, they just don't want to work with us!"
No, that's a worse question, because the answer is more obvious and it's not interesting.
Wow that’s impressive… and dangerous I guess? I can’t see how this won’t become an antipattern, especially to display ads on websites…