skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Do it already. Quit talking about and be about it. This way we can confirm if Reddit was lying about the nature of the compromised data in its initial disclosure.
I hope they don't do it.

I've had a similar situation with PHP, where we had written quite a large engine (https://github.com/Qbix/Platform) with many features (https://qbix.com/features.pdf) . It took advantage of the fact that PHP isolated each script and gave it its own global variables, etc. In fact, much of the request handling did stuff like this:

Q_Request::requireFields(['a', 'b', 'c']);
$uri = Q_Dispatcher::uri();

instead of stuff like this:

$this->getContext()->request()->requireFields(['a', 'b', 'c']);
$this->getContext()->dispatcher()->uri();

Over the last few years, I have run across many compelling things:

amp
reactPHP
Swoole (native extension)
Fibers (inside PHP itself)

It seemed so cool! PHP could behave like Node! It would have an event loop and everything. Fibers were basically PHP's version of Swoole's coroutines, etc. etc.

Then I realized... we would have to go through the entire code and redo how it all works. We'd also no longer benefit from PHP's process isolation. If one process crapped out or had a memory leak, it could take down everything else.

There's a reason PHP still runs 80% of all web servers in the world (https://kinsta.com/blog/is-php-dead/) ... and one of the biggest is that commodity servers can host terrible PHP code and it's mostly isolated in little processes that finish "quickly" before they can wreak havoc on other processes or on long-running stuff.

So now back to postgres. It's been praised for its rock-solid reliability and security. It's got so many features and the MVCC is very flexible. It seems to use a lot of global variables. They can spend their time on many other things, like making it byzantine-fault-tolerant, or something.

The clincher for me was when I learned that php-fpm (which spins up processes which sleep when waiting for I/O) is only 50% slower than all those fancy things above. Sure, PHP with Swoole can outperform even Node.js, and can handle twice as many requests. But we'd rather focus on soo many other things we need to do :)
Work for a 30bn market cap company, all our stuff is built on AWS. Offices all around the globe. Not a single electrician on payroll.

YMMV.
Qt6
housing: sufficient for a single parent

A single parent could share a 1 bedroom apartment with another single parent. That's ok?

I believe that all healthcare should be covered

No country covers all healthcare.

The tactic you're performing here is called "Sea lioning" and it's a bad-faith tactic; but I'll answer the questions just in case you didn't know what I meant by what I said.

You didn't answer the questions at all. Saying "it needs to be sufficient" is not an answer. And calling it "sealioning" doesn't change that.
I'd be way more hesitant to recommend that move in a car. With a motorcycle splitting lanes, there's a low chance anyone will be between lanes and if there is someone there, it's the motorcyclist that will likely suffer the consequences so they'll have a high level of awareness. On top of that, being squished between two cars is a much riskier place to be for a motorcyclist then a car.

I say this because I had a friend who was killed when another driver swerved into her lane while trying to avoid rear ending another car. In that case, rear ending the other car would've been way safer. So yeah, just be absolutely certain the lane you're swerving into is clear. That should go without say but apparently it didn't for the woman that killed my friend (and I bet she thought she was pulling off a ninja move until it was too late).
If the goal was to prevent war amongst the European nations, as is their wont, I’d say it’s successful - or as Maverick said, “Ask me again tomorrow, but it’s lookin’ good so far.”

Granted, seventy years isn’t too long in the scheme of things, but I’d say it has a lot of life in it yet.
It seems to me that this "hash all the things" setup seems absolutely made for IPFS integration, which AIUI would mean that everyone who chooses to seed those nix stores would incrementally reduce the bandwidth burden upon the "main" nix store. I'm not sure if nix hashes take the $(uname -sm) into consideration, so that could be a hurdle, too

I can very easily imagine that it would need to be opt-in, to keep security peeps from losing their minds, but my suspicion is that a non-zero number of actual nix users would choose to turn it on in support of the community
Optimize: A Poem
> what a severe lack of imagination

I think you just described chicago acid house :-P
Hmm I tried searching "elixir" and found nothing related to the language. HN Algolia gives me exactly what I want. On what basis do you say it's "not helpful"?
> most of the topics I engage in on social media have little to no censorship.

How would you know that?
Problems: https://www.isitdownrightnow.com/archive.is.html
hey Julien. I love the product but the search doesn't seem to be doing the best for me. For example, I looked up Tailwind and got plenty of results but none of them actually involved Tailwind.

Maybe a tagging solution is the way? if you determine a set amount of popular keywords for a topic and filter around those, you can offer more relevant results. With some sort of public tagging system you can also have SEO friendly pages around tags and get people browsing stuff they wouldn't normally search for.
Sorry it took me a few days to see this. Right now we have trust per person, and a separate "preference" by topic. Our end goal is to do trust per person per topic.
Thank you for this example; it wasn't clear to me reading the article, but this is the main problem I was hope being solved. Will make writing tests much smoother.
Richard D. Fisher, Jr. On Taiwan: What If We Only Have Six Months?
I could be wrong, but I think they can probably make the initial orders now and sell the production slots to someone else down the line if necessary?

Don't aircraft manufacturers secure a bunch of order commitments before production so they can get financing for their manufacturing operations?

I don't know the details, but I think it is a lot more complex then just "placing orders to buy airplanes"
I will take a look -- however, since I only use a single file, it may not be needed.
If you look at it as seats delivered, the 480 plane order from Air India is actually much larger since they're ordering wide-bodies, while the IndiGo order seems to be entirely narrow bodies.

Air India: 190 737 Max aircraft, 20 of Boeing’s 787s, and 10 of its 777Xs. Customer options for an additional 50 737 Maxs and 20 of its 787s. 40 wide-body A350 Airbus aircraft and another 210 narrow-body A320neo planes.

IndiGo: 500 A320s (likely the A320neo)
>>our credit card is guaranteed by your personal finances and there are actual consequences for you if you default or declare bankruptcy.

These are the same consequences a business face if they do not pay vendors on net 30 terms...

>It is weird to have a completely unsecured loan that is dischargeable by bankruptcy that won't cause personal loss for the owners.

Having been through personal bankruptcy, its not.. In Chapter 7 Bankruptcy a person can discharge many unsecured debts while keeping their primary home, and most personal possessions, this is a common. There are several ways you can come through Chapter 7 with secured debt being protected / excluded (meaning you still owe) from the bankruptcy and all unsecured debt being discharged.

it is common myth that to be "bankrupt" means you have nothing and are homeless, because of this myth people often wait far far far too long to seek legal advice around their rights under the bankruptcy laws and often do something stupid like paying off unsecured debt with secured 2nd mortgages, or HELC making their situations FAR FAR worse

>>you're not going to convince me it is good for the suppliers to have historically allowed this to come about.

If ti was not good for the suppliers they would not do it

To be clear I am not even sure what you are on about, my orginal comment about Automotive Companies being predatory to vendors has NOTHING to do with net 30 terms, or unsecured debt in the form of accounts payable.

Hell every supplier I know would be happy with Net 60 terms..

large Auto suppler agreements have all kinds of provisions about quality, On time delivery, and various other performance metrics that the companies can use in very creative ways to claw back money already paid to the vendor, then there are the changes to production forecasting that requires suppliers to spin up or down capacity, staffing ect, only to have it then change soon after.

i could go on and on listing abusive practices that have NOTHING AT ALL to do with the very common practice of invoicing customers for goods sold
How to Prevent Another Financial Crisis
Looks like it is another stupid unscrupulous gang of lawyers and accountants who have no ethical or moral views that are exploiting laws and regulations to gain more power. I have no respect for brands that behaves in this way
Not sure what company you worked for, but I can't spend money unless it's approved by the company.
The more experience you have the more you're used to these things happening. I don't have to know that a specific thing might go wrong but I'm used to there being some random bullshit (weird CI, library happens to be deprecated, version inconsistencies, data turns out to have a fatal flaw, licensing, whatever).

You can't plan for everything though, and you're right this is where a good PM helps.

But then again this is all just estimates. The better you can estimate the better you can plan.
Can I compile rust-written linux modules with a rust-written rust compiler?

And where can I download bootstrap static ELF64 binaries of this compiler?
A number of folks have already said this, but it helps to have more voices: Don't.

I started college at 20, and dropped out a year later to pursue other things. Although I got into the industry through my own self-learning, it took me a full 20 years more to finally get my Bachelors.

It will be a major challenge to go back into school if you leave. Not from an administrative standpoint (probably) but definitely from a social-economic one. Once you get started into your career, it can be very hard to reorient yourself back into academics. For me, I had the hardest time coping with the Sisyphusian nature of school, where so much of it felt like "what's the point of this?" when the real world often had real rewards.

You've got the rest of your life to upskill and work (seriously, you'll move jobs frequently, and you'll always be learning stuff.) Maybe more than you want to. Enjoy this situation right now. It doesn't come around again.
I'd suggest getting a job. You'll learn more working than you will in a CS program or working in a silo on your own projects. Personally I never went back to school after getting hired because I hated school so much
Runtime type systems: TS has none; C# has extensive RTTI

Function dispatch: TS is purely dynamic; C# has both static and dynamic

OOP: Mandatory in C#, optional in TS

Variance: Implicit in TS, explicit in C#

Numeric types: TS has one (number); C# has the entire signed/unsigned/float x 8/16/32/64-bit matrix

There's really no intentional effort to converge them.
It seems that they just did that.

We'd have to look at the details of the contract to see if half of the ticket price is refunded in the event that they bring you to the Titanic but don't bring you back to the surface.
Why did you go back and get a bachelor's if you already had a job?
This is not what happened, they had the trademark for "Big Mac". They took Supermac's to court because their name was too similar, and ended up losing the trademark.

For a while Burger King Sweden was selling burgers using the name, apparently the "Anything But a Big Mac", "Burger Big Mac Wished it Was", etc.
But if I have power from two sources coming into my facility, they wouldn't be in phase with each other, right? How do I use both?

(Perhaps the obvious answer is correct here: "Grids don't work that way; you'd never do that.")
How the Japanese gov't intends to reduce plastic use by 2030 (2021)
Wired knows better. Apple is required by US trademark law to file pro forma objections to other similar logos because if they don't, they can be accused of constructive abandonment' of their own mark which will drastically limit their ability to seek recourse against genuine infringement.

The problem here is not Apple, but the perverse incentives in US trademark jurisprudence.
I never found his argument convincing.

The main tension in his manifesto is motivated by an underlying assumption that isn’t accurate. He sees technology as being a distinct force in opposition to humanity rather than an extension of humanity and that is the source of his fears. There are a lot of reasons to believe that technology is not an opposing force, like the idea of embedded cognition and embedded action.

I think technology is better understand as something connected to human intention and we can evaluate technology by how well it maps on to our unique quirks and needs. So for example when you look at a bee hive do you see it as a diabolical prison made by bees for bees or a complicated construction connected to a set of intentions that fulfill the needs of bees?
France might have some imperial/colonial intentions, rest of Europe is actively fighting against neocolonialism by supporting Ukraine against Russian imperialism.
This feels like developers are bored and want a challenge.
> functional programming gang

This is a bit of weird assignment, given that the Class syntactic sugar over Prototype was one of the marquee features of that release.
Things rarely change at all once they're at stage 3. That's why TS waits until that stage before implementing. There might be a minor tweak in some edge cases but stage 3 is usually "done".
I had a problem where an android device I had purchased from eBay was "locked" after a week. I could still operate the device, but not connect it to a network. It was apparently through the carrier with the IMEI and it didn't matter that I had a valid SIM that worked in the old phone. The phone was not carrier locked, but apparently, the old owner hadn't released it and could still make it dead/stolen.

I went back through the seller, and they refunded the purchase and I got another that worked fine. They said it's a risk of buying phones from individuals even if you check status at the time of purchase. Luckily, I still had my old phone and retransferred all the data back over again and lost little except for a few calls/SMS messages.
The C# keyword for this feature is in fact, "using".

And the choice was made by JavaScript. TypeScript is honoring that.
He doesn't work there anymore, there is a difference, he was a co-founder and present until he ~~self-destructed~~ left in 2020.
Why I don’t see mentioned is: why?

Is it about reliability? Cost? Both? Why not-for-profit?

What controls will be in place to ensure that this one new company will be more responsive to the public than the prior two, smaller companies?
Discord is more popular because it gives more instant feedback. This makes it far more addictive than forums
You're missing something important here.

Is Nix harder to learn for somebody who knows nothing about computers and OSes? Probably not. It might even be easier.

But that's not Nix's primary audience. It's targeted at people who already know a fair bit about the current paradigm and have plenty of skill with it. For those people, it's very different. Things that are easy for them will be hard until they learn the new paradigm.

I get that people who have already learned Nix and like it are in the new paradigm. Understanding it is not a problem for them. But pretending that work doesn't exist for others is unhelpful. And this sort of casual dismissal makes me suspect that even if I learned Nix, the experience still might be pretty bad. If Nix advocates can't take seriously the difficult noob experience, maybe the experience is painful all the way through.
The issue is generally in noticing them the first time.

As a motorcyclist SMIDSY accidents are my worst nightmare - that is, right angle turn, car pulls out in front of the bike.

Bikes aren't super visible from a long distance and the benefit of parallax from spaced headlights is greatly reduced.
No other explanation except that they’re registering a very specific logo which they are now the owners of but has been used in trade since the 60s within the domain of trade relating to the historical use of that trademark (that is music and related media). You know, exactly the sort of thing you might expect the owner of a trademark to do in all the relevant legal jurisdictions where it might be using that mark in trade
See the change in Israeli politics for how useful breeders are in democracies.
I wonder if that stuff is available on places like libgen. If it isn't, I really hope someone digitizes it.
My understanding is that there are very few options for getting radio signals through the water, especially that deep.
It is not good for suppliers to allow no collateral. But they are being forced into. That is what the market has naturally created for supplier. Think about this, a company produce a widget to sell to consumer. Before they can sell, they have to "invest". If the entire world that producer is the one to produce, then consumer can put up the deposit which in this case act a bit like collateral (though more of partial payment). Now, imagine ice cream producer ask you to pay up first, even if you like that brand, you probably will just walk to another seller who offer you the same thing but without the pay first. Now imagine there are many producers but only one of you. Every producers will automatically waive the deposit or collateral to get you to buy from them. This has always been the case in suppliers world. In some instance, supplier able to get collateral but in the form of insurance. That gets very complicated and I feel like it would be harder for you to relate unless you have some finance or business background.
Datacenters are expensive to run, for many reasons. That is the appeal of the Cloud right there, before we even start talking about the people aspect.
Losing a trademark just means that it's not protected, and anyone can use it. Burger King Sweden was directly making fun of the Big Mac in their menu for a while after this case, since they could do it legally.
This is an interesting observation but it matches my perception of traditional project philosophies: "we know what's best for you" (Apple / Gnome) vs. "here are options, have at it" (KDE / Windows)
Reddit has the same problem, anybody can make an alt and spam random BS on small or large subs. Moderators just deal with it.
I don't see any reason to think why it isn't. Unless you don't have a basic understanding about the most primitive laws of physics. Even the slightest mishap at that depth and you're in more trouble than you would be if you were stranded on the ISS.
I love how this all went full circle. You know, just a few years ago, there still was the narrative of how bad JS is. Especially on HN. "Designed in only ten days", people made fun of it for being such a half-assed language. Stuff like the "Wat" talk, making fun of left-pad, etc.

Now it's "JavaScript used to be a little elegant". Fantastic.

More seriously:

1. This is typescript. Feel free to use js without it. (EDIT: This is wrong :)

2. This is a relatively easy feature, and there are equivalent features in some other mainstream languages.

You don't have to like it, I'm not sure I do, but this feels so dramatic.
The correctness problem should be handled by a suite of automated tests which PostgreSQL has. If all tests pass, the application must work correctly. The project is too big, and has too many developers to make much progress without full test coverage. Where else would up-to-date documentation regarding the correct behavior of PostgreSQL exist? In some developers head? SQLite is pretty famous for there extreme approach to testing including out of memory conditions, and other rare circumstances: https://www.sqlite.org/testing.html
I'd say you were too nice.

Even if it didn't help you personally, having pursued it more vigorously would have been a public good as it would ensure a documented record of the misdeed which future prospects could use to avoid the bad actor, as well as discouraging new bad actors from developing as they would see the loss rate as exceeding the win rate etc.

As long as everyone keeps letting shit go, letting bad actors off without penalty just because it would take more effort than it was personally worth, then we will continue to see these behaviors manifested and likely at an increasing rate as it proves it's effectiveness.
I understand that this is the approach being taken by bluesky social.
From what I can tell from that documentation, you do still have to remember to call `client.release()`. There's even a big warning saying "You must release a client when you are finished with it."

Presumably you would want to wrap that in a try/finally so that you don't accidentally not release the client if there is an exception.

You would go from:

const client = await pool.connect()
try {
// Do stuff. Possibly throw.
} finally {
client.release()
}

to

await using client = pool.connect()
// Do stuff. Possibly throw.
Is there any reason at all people use intrinsically bug-prone and broken multithreading mode instead of fork() and IPC apart from WinAPI having no proper fork?
>This has been going on for a while: "I disagree with an recognized expert (linguists) on a fundamental concept (definition of dialect) based on my rather singular experience (or youtube research) so those experts must be 'woke' and I will now become enraged!"

This is worse than Scientism. I'm not going to lay out my credentials for you, I'll just say that most "woke" shit dovetails heavily with far-right ethnonationalism, which I elucidated elsewhere (since you might not know that most cuban-americans are politically aligned with the far-right), and I have no patience for white-liberals, or liberals in general, who go around whining about identity politics without any real social critique.
Worked on a codebase which was separate processes, each of which has a shedload of global variables. It was a nightmare working out what was going on, not helped by the fact that there was no naming convention for the globals, plus they were not declared in a single place. I believe their use was a performance move, ie having the linker pin a var to a specific memory location rather than copying it to the stack as a variable and referencing it by offset the whole time. Premature optimisation? Optimisation at all? Who knows, but there's a good reason coding standards typically militate against globals.
Pls sort by recency. Otherwise you see 13 year old articles most of them obsolete/irrelevant to the current situation.
You are probably not their target demographic. People who spend $250,000 on vacations probably hear about it regularly.
I work full time remote. I don't have to fill out a timesheet
İs it possible to code it without qt creator?
How long has NOVEC been around? Can you share anything about how they came to be?

Do they own the grid and wires and whatnot, or just the power? Are there other choices in your area?
You mean like Switzerland with 4 official languages existing in its current form since 1848?