skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Some companies like to be sneaky with whether they're open to remote or not.

"Oh we have plenty of remote employees! But it is on a team per team basis so that's something you'll have to bring up with your manager", says the recruiter

"Oh that's a great question, let me check in with my VP but we should definitely keep the ball rolling!", says the manager.

The interviews go on, and then they push an offer with a big number, except now they're not ambiguous and they tell you you're gonna have to move to SF/NYC/etc, hoping the big number will do the convincing.

In my experience, pulling that trick on a Swedish or a Swiss person will be met with a flat "nah I'm not interested in SF, thanks for wasting my time".

(same trick applies with companies who have multiple offices and tell you they're open to you working at $OFFICE_OF_CHOICE... until the offer is on the table and all of a sudden they really care where you'll have to be)

There's definitely lots of cultural things at play here; one of them in my experience is that American culture tends to see a lot of things as "negotiable", whereas European cultures (especially nordic/germanic ones!) like things to be clear and black on white from the get go.
Looking at your username, it would be nice to mention that you are one of the main developers behind the tool instead of making it sound like you are unrelated: https://github.com/casbin/casbin/graphs/contributors https://github.com/casdoor/casdoor/graphs/contributors
No? One of the hottest sectors of FPGA products currently are FPGA-accelerated NICs.
Why doesn't it support llama?
I found out just a few days ago our company tries to be "super bright" in its banner ads with .img_ad:hover { -webkit-filter: brightness(120%);}
Iridium: Open-source customer identity and access management
You’re working from a cost-efficiency / cost optimization perspective. That’s a great perspective in some contexts, for example, mature late-stage products, fully saturated markets, etc.

Is cost efficiency an effective perspective for innovation or revenue growth? Mostly, no. As long as your risk-of-ruin is low, then you want to fail. Sometimes people misinterpret this as “doing the wrong thing”. But it takes doing a lot of wrong things to do the right thing.

The difference between right and wrong, if there ever was such a simple dichotomy, is so marginal and only understood in hindsight.
There are about 10 companies that still make vacuum tubes for a variety of products. There is also stock you can find on eBay or at ham radio festivals pretty easily. There are even customers who make crystals for old rigs like the Hallicrafters and Drake lines.
I followed a scientific American article in 1992 as a high schooler and got digit recognition and basic arithmetic working on a 386. What the popsci press said at the time was that we were limited by memory bandwidth (cache size), training data, and to some extend pointer-chasing (and other inefficencies) in graph algos
For one, welfare and retirement programs won't work. Those require at least an equal replacement population. Either the younger generation will be paying a lot more in with no return in later life, or they just won't be able to support the system.
Without looking closer I just assumed it was trivially extracted from the frontend.
They usually avoid using them because they have very limited supply and can't make new ones fast. Now they are losing one a day at least. That's a lot.
Of course there might always be exceptions but I doubt that games like Stardew Valley or Papers, Please! could fall through the cracks.. but who knows.

I think there is a general saturation problem. I won't have the time to play 20, 30 or even 50 games a year. I don't need more games but better ones (in general.. there are of course great games).
I got some unexpected melodic mellow Indian-sounding sitar-music with the input prompt "suomisaundi". Not at all what I expected, but quite nice nevertheless!

It worked better with "suomisaundi psychedelic trance spugedelic".

This is a neat idea in many ways.
Yep, that's true.
A lot of us here in the tech sector are desperately looking for a way out of the country

US/Canada are the top options
I wish Netanyahu and his ultra religious gang good luck
>> they just don't know how to write software, so the supposed four freedoms are almost entirely lost on them.

I don't know how to do car repairs, that's why I hire someone to do it for me.

Software developers can be hired to work on software the same way.

>> it is simply un-economical to imagine a software world that is run non-commercially in the current economical models.

Software freedom does not have to mean non-commercial. Software can respect freedom and still be sold commercially.

>> the only economical way of creating free software is as a cooperation project between several commercial entities

This is not strictly true.

While many large projects have many interested contributors and supporters, some projects are driven by a single company, a small team, or a single person.
I'd wish that for you but it might not make you happy. That's the paradox.
> They also included gag orders and giving up legal rights.

This indicates that the author is writing in bad faith. There’s no company in America with even vaguely competent lawyers that isn’t going to condition any severance payment on a general release. That’s literally the consideration the employee is providing. You’re certainly free to decline the deal and sue or arbitrate, but in the absence of punitive damage it’s not going to be more than about three months.
they simply succeeded in a different direction!
They pay, but it doesn’t matter that much when you are so wealthy.
> no good vision

Ah yes, years of continuing technical and product innovations, with "no good vision"
I've been against this site for a long time[1]. Yes, there's a lot to be learned from failed startups. And yes, failures such as Theranos (or in this case, uBiome) deserve a very bright spotlight on them.

But this site just feels like it's picking on people. They never have any real insight; they just call out founders by name and use fast-paced sounding words to cover up that there's not much information to be gleaned. Startups usually don't work out, and as long as no fraud happens, that's just the way it works.

(If you're looking for a good version of this, where people on the inside are interviewed about what's going wrong, I highly recommend this episode of Startup: https://gimletmedia.com/shows/startup/awhmbo)

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24733189
Return to monke?

Return to 4chan!
The problem the author hit with the Raspberry Pi is that the ARM image is meant for a standard environment (e.g UEFI ), like VMs.

e.g it'll boot on Fusion or kvm because they provide UEFI, a well known device tree, and don't require any firmware at that stage.

Pis (and many such ARM boards) don't have that so they won't be bootable. But there are Pi images built on Hydra. If one uses that then it boots right away.

It's all documented in the Nix wiki.

https://nixos.wiki/wiki/NixOS_on_ARM#Installation
Yes, and there is a nuclear fusion reactor above our heads right now, but that is similarly irrelevant when talking about bomb self-assembly.
Legal firms will be able to soon compare the size of their supercomputers that have to respond and overwhelm the opposition. From law to bits.
When adeptima says "Keycloak is a non-brain solution" I believe that is intended as an endorsement.

Americans use the term 'no-brainer' as a positive thing - a decision so good, easy and obvious that even someone with no brain would make it.

That's in contrast to a most colloquialisms about decisions made without brain power - calling a decision 'thoughtless' or 'dumbass' would instead be a negative thing.
Thanks for your input.

I agree and already imagined an animation that would make it clear why async. on both ends of transition servers connections is useful.

The sorry excuses of visualizations I have now are truly WTF.

Also all links being out-of-order does not help.

I just need to pick tools. Leaning towards animated .gif now.

Edit: I fixed the example link atleast. It fetches data from the distributed db.
So what you're saying is that Apple is infringing on this Swiss company's trademark and must be forced to change their logo before logos with apples are irreversibly associated with Apple instead of the Swiss company?
Emacs is a text ecosystem. And it's trivial to add these shortcuts. Evil[0] basically rewires everything to be Vim.

[0]: https://github.com/emacs-evil/evil
Step 3, don't enforce your borders or immigration laws and bring in a "replacement" population.

You're right, they are pyramid schemes. Which is why I think it's dangerous to put important programs like this in the government's hands and make your population reliant on them.
Reforming the free software message
Why do I include a Community section in Short Ruby News?
I know this isn't a great time for reddit, but I just made this on your behalf:

https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenLLM/

I much prefer the HN/Reddit discussion format to Discord and even Stack Overflow.
I'm a total laymen on the embedded side, and as such I think this looks great and the GPL and permissive licensing options are a very welcome and (IMO) fair way to engage and empower the community.
I don't know, I think that any proprietary software (and I include firmwares in that) should be prohibited by law. Same for hardware, all the schematics and specs should be provided.
Attacking fruit sellers is not "a vision".
Also no time at all when arriving. Getting out of a train and the station rarely takes more than five minutes; usually less.
AFAIK asio based networking TS is dead.
It is a pretty different way of programming, and that's part of what makes it so fun. Within constraints, you get a really interactive way to design algorithms which are much more parallel than what is feasible to write for a CPU. Debugging is so much better these days with some support for debuggers and printf (at least on CUDA). Maybe the same facilities aren't available for WebGPU?

Conditions and loops are largely fine as long as you avoid warp divergence and such.
I'd love to see an interview with one of these lawyers. What trauma does it take to warp a human mind into thinking you can own the concept of images of a fruit? Or is this a case of pure sociopathy and the rule of law is the only thing stopping these guys from torturing animals and running over kids in the street?
Are you keeping any of your configurations in a public place to use as a starting point?
Why not call the drawing the non-creative bit, then, if it's purely a distinction? (-:
To all of your questions: Yes, in general.
LLMs could indeed address the first part, but not the second, of bringing the newcomers in via actual conversation with the older members.
The only good solution I encountered to this is of having some (preferably not too experienced) member(s) actively take upon themselves the role of welcoming newcomers and answering their questions, whether that's in an official or unofficial capacity.

This to me is the real way through this "Eternal September", where in every "cohort" of newcomers, one or more choose to stay close to the doorway to welcome and guide the next cohort.
You are correct, and the parent comment is confused. Nanite does support faster instancing but its unique advantage is being a fast software renderer for assets with very large polygon counts.
Expectations are important and are missing from the equation here. Not everyone needs children, a fat pension or a large house to be fulfilled. It is also perfectly fine to be with the same group of people, have the same routines and the same hobbies for your entire life.

The less you want, the fewer milestones you need to hit.

I used to think my dad was boring because he never really wanted to do anything. Worked the same mid-level job for 30+ years, had no friends--just took care of us. A couple years back he passed away, smile on his face. Told me he did everything he ever wanted. Told me not to work so hard.

I think about this all the time whenever I'm stressed about claiming my "ownership in society."
It can be configured to notify(default), check manually or update automatically. I prefer the default. I only used it with winget, MS Store and Chocolately.

In my experience however, it had some issues (I believe they are actually due to winget) with some packages like Postgresql.

Overall I am happy with it and I prefer getting gui notifications for updates instead of manually running winget.
Except it didn't work and had awful performance as soon as you did any syscall (this is especially apparent for filesystem access). It's a neat idea, but Linux has over 300 syscalls with varying levels of complexity in their behavior.
> "I ended up hearing a LOT of this music when it was actually being made, and neither "Chiptune" nor "Chip Music" was widely in use, if at all."

Thousands upon thousands of chiptunes were composed on the Amiga. Hundreds of chiptune collections and so-called "music disks" were made specifically targeting this subcategory. In the Amiga scene it was a musical artistic phenomenon in its own right, and the term was solidly cemented. What you're saying is not one bit in parity with reality.

And, they're all tracker modules, whatever the genre. Chiptunes are a specific subcategory.
Hey, they 'stole' my ideas from 2017. Perhaps inspired, or it just made sense to think about:

I wrote a couple of articles about better UX tools, went into a protype for text command based wireframing:

https://medium.com/proof-of-concept/creating-a-true-ux-tool-...

The other articles [1] go more into this, but it includes ideas about auto-generating flow-charts, easily export your UX source code, generate working front-end, etc.

I once presented this to ~30 UX designers, and they liked the general idea of a more holistic UX tool that does not take the wireframe as the central piece, but the project as a whole. But when I started showing text-commands as a prototype to show how different interfaces could be built for ux source code, I got nothing but blank stares.. haha, they did not want to look at text representing elements.

So while I agree with Sketch that there is value in UX source code, and the tools they have created seem great. I hope they integrate it in their other tools, so you can output the same source code via a GUI.

And then someone could write a script that converts my UX source code, from my mobile wireframing app TinyUX [2] with theirs :D.

[1] First article of series: "A True UX tool" https://medium.com/@JuliusHuijnk/a-true-ux-tool-9e892b0dc1a5)

[2] Wireframing on your phone by tapping icons. Hope to grow that into a more refined and 'holistic' UX tool: https://tinyux.app
There should be a penalty for such bogus trademark claims, best as % of the global revenue. Then, maybe, they would learn that a corporation cannot bully others only because it has unlimited legal resources.
Except that’s a terrible solution ,when working w docker, compared to WSL.
The BoM has a lot of overpriced versions of common parts, as well.

It's not quite as bad as it seems at first blush.
I was always wondering how does it compare to halide or sycl or are those completely unrelated projects with different goals?
It would be quite weird to have these vocabulary types in the standard without any way to use them for networking within the standard library. Like having std::filesystem::path without having actual filesystem operations working on them.
Lemon Squeezy for Laravel 1.0 is Here
Are you against products in general, or just when it comes to treating software as a product? I think that is a question you should answer first.

Furthermore, if software is not allowed to be a product, can you sell a service based on software as a product? If no, services as Netflix cease to exist. If yes, where is the boundary between the software and the service?

Finally, who are you to tell people what they can and cannot sell as a product? Sounds like the worst kind of regulation to me!
I haven’t seen a situation where anyone on the other side of a legal suite thinks their opponents are using the legal system in good faith.
Came here to mention that episode. Agree that it was very insightful. Transcript:

https://pastebin.com/Lg7zfHd9
It seems to mean "companies that failed after raising the most money" rather than "companies whose failures were the most extreme".
It's supposed to limit corruption by making it harder to give contracts as political favors
No kidding. I'd love to see the bigger company loose their logo in one of these petty trademark disputes someday.
You are not alone. Lots of Reddit users report a similar sentiment. Quickly highlighting a few examples:

"Why is Amazon Music Android such a heaped pile of dog turd in a dumpster that's been set on fire and put out with stray cat urine?"[1]

"Is this app complete garbage for everyone?"[2]

"How could you put your name on this GARBAGE"[3]

"Why does the Amazon Music app suck so much?"[4]

"Go fuck yourself Amazon"[5]

"Amazon deserves a class action lawsuit"[6]

"Echo auto unusable"[7]

"WOW Amazon Music is sooo bad"[8]

"I swear I'm about to go back to just using a regular MP3 player for music because this app is TERRIBLE"[9]

"Podcasts crash app constantly"[10]

"Questionable Amazon Practices"[11]

"What happened to Amazon Music?"[12]

[1]https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonMusic/comments/10q010k/why_is...

[2]https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonMusic/comments/1439nia/is_thi...

[3]https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonMusic/comments/12et9cu/how_co...

[4]https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonMusic/comments/11jkydy/why_do...

[5]https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonMusic/comments/yr0b1w/go_fuck...

[6]https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonMusic/comments/118jioq/amazon...

[7]https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonMusic/comments/ynbt2t/echo_au...

[8]https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonMusic/comments/13qtfyq/wow_am...

[9]https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonMusic/comments/12s0d1k/i_swea...

[10]https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonMusic/comments/13eo91e/podcas...

[11]https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonMusic/comments/124257q/questi...

[12]https://www.reddit.com/r/AmazonMusic/comments/12b6kfw/what_h...
It would be fun if they lost also the trademark of any apple-related image, including their silly bitten apple logo.

Really, fuck IP and trademark laws. I see it as a net negative. I would rather throw this cursed baby away along with its shit water.
Probably it will work for the "Switch 2", if there will be such a product.
The way you describe it is a myth. Half of the 'genericized' products were done so as a concession of WW1 or the company willfully choosing something overly generic for royalties or poor circumstances (flip phone, videotape, respectively). The rest expired, were caught in disputes with other companies, or occurred before expansions of copyright law.

You'll notice the rest of the page is legally protected trademarks that have NOT expired, despite common and generic use by individuals. Hoover did not lose their brand, nor Kleenex.
I wouldn't call a 4 to 6 rows of buttons before you get content a 'better UI'...
It seems cluttered at best. Even the not-exactly-amazing Mac AppStore has a small partition for navigation and a large partition for content and that's it.
Will Reddit count when it dies on July 1st?

I am only partially joking here as I believe what the CEO is doing is an absolute failure in how to run a company. He doesn't understand where the value of his business is.

Even if you believe that 3rd party apps are costing you too much you can approach this differently. Start with lower fees, give people time to adjust. Then there is the whole question of banning NFSW content but only in the API. Makes no sense at all.
One of the most inspiring things I heard was - if I recall correctly - the Dead Space director giving a talk at GDC.

They were talking how from the get go their mentality was - if we're going to make a horror game, it has to be the most fucking horrifying game anyone has played. If we make a horror game that's kind of scary but not that extreme, then what are we doing?

I've strived to carry that mentality in all my projects since.
Free money for Swiss farmers is what I see here lol
I'm not a lawyer but I would have thought the fruit union food trademark would be in a different trademark class to Apple's computer trademark accoring to the WIPO Nice list. (https://www.wipo.int/classifications/nice/nclpub/en/fr/help/)

Would this have any chance or are Apple just planning to bludgeon the other side with lawyers until they run out of money?
It depends if you're going from "centre to centre" or "somewhere near Cologne to somewhere near Berlin".
Can relate to that. You could check out the fediverse. There's plenty people with the mindshare there, and the ecosystem is moving on from microblogging towards stronger communities and technical support for them.
> All of the inclusivity movements that have happened in my workplace have involved hiring people unfit to do their job.

I'm starting to think there's more harm than good with these inclusivity movements. It creates two categories of students (and grads) when looking at hiring: people you know are there on merit and people who maybe got a little bit of help from "the quota".

I've heard it (in engineering only meetings) "you know this guy is solid, he went to X and he's Asian so you know he's there for the right reasons". And the thing is, you can't really argue with that logic.

Something I have to wonder is are women and minorities... ok with this?
On that last point. It’s incredible that as one crab is about to climb out of the bucket (tech workers becoming financially independent) and is pushed back down, the others take so much joy in it. While idolizing the fisherman that pushed that crab back down.

They never, ever, seem to think — wow someone almost escaped this bucket, maybe we should try too.

It’s incredible how self sabotaging we humans are.
Nix vs not Nix seems like a parallel to Infrastructure As Code (terraform for example) vs Cowboying the AWS Console. Is that a fair comparison?
If you get a cleaner you like, your best bet is to get their contact info and book directly with them. It will be cheaper than going through the platform, you will get exactly the cleaner you want and you will get a better service.

This disintermediation was a worry, but I don't think this happened frequently enough the justify the fear. It was hard to discern how much this was happening from the data; anecdotally it was rare.
Isn't this already true? The article makes that point at the very beginning and many people who cut ties or stopped supporting the FSF and Stallman still seem to be committed to the principles of libre software.
A silly example: when I was young I loved the game civ. In some games I would occasionally actually succeed at defeating all competition. But the game wouldn’t end cause you could try to go to another solar system or something still. But it was much less fun once the competition was over.
> As such the public will gravitate between two choices. 3rd place is no-where land.

I see this as an uniquely American approach to things. Doesn't extrapolate to the rest of the world.

> Trident got canned for a reason.

Trident got canned because Google used underhanded methods to throw it out.

Gecko remains only because there need to be at least two, independent implementations for a web standard to be pushed through.

As it stands there is no real competition here - Google is calling the shots.