skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You don't remove images that are overfit, you adjust parameters like model size, add error functions for exact reproductions training data, etc.

You can deduplicate images that are overfit if you have hundreds of them in your data set, which makes it much less likely overfitting happens.
https://osgameclones.com/
Still sounds like a miserable experience compared to fancyzones though
This isn't the same task that you described in the first comment. Did GPT4 include nouns that didn't use the article "der" in its output? Or did it fail to reply with the 200 most common ones?
Hard disagree. Subversion is awfully complex compared to git.

Yes, Subversion is initially easier to learn and use than git. It's not easier to set up as it's client-server while git is fully local. Also Subversion is an incongruous mess.
The idea isn't that you get in trouble for taking invalid communion, but rather, that particular communion doesn't count; you participated in one fewer eucharists than you thought you had.

(I think, but am not totally sure, that this is a fringe tradcath belief, and that for the overwhelming majority of Catholics (including the clergy), this doesn't matter at all; if you felt it counted, did it in good faith, &c, it counted.
The Git docs are horrible, but that's not because the author is smarter than you. It's because the author is a lousy communicator.
The problem you are trying to solve is not the elevator operator. The elevator operator is a byproduct of a rushed cheap solution to the problem of crime/access to top floor/whatever the actual problem is. Therefore yes, a retrofit could be a potential solution among many others, what actually is the problem, and how effectively does the role solve it?

I should step away from the elevator example because people are clinging to it a bit too firmly when the entire point is to question [job role], not the specific elevator operator.
2022-04-19 Adjusted expiration
While local politics are difficult to judge from afar, I generally wouldn't consider the SPD left for a long time now. I'd recommend not putting too much weight on the (local) voting results.
There's a hell of a lot of overlap between 'being' and 'ideology'. How would you characterise being a Muslim? I'm not religious, but I wouldn't say it's just an ideology. Further gay pride isnt just about happening to like someone of the same sex.

Further further. What's the practical difference? Am I supposed to just turn my liberalness off? Why is that just an ideology rather than being?
Side note: It's so weird for me to hear the term "google search". It's what happens when you haven't used a site directly in years. I almost have to ask myself (facetiously), is Google Search still a thing?

The same thing has happened with Microsoft. I used to be a Windows/GUI user (never in love with the company going back to DOS, I was a PC-DOS user (IBM)) until I switched over to Linux many years ago. Microsoft basically ceased to exist (except for github).

I hear Microsoft in the news and it's almost like they exist in a parallel universe.

Apple - never has existed (for me). Facebook/Twitter - accts but never use. Spotify - nope. Etc, etc...

The only reason I bring this up is because, despite this, I still remain well-connected. I have lost nothing from the Web. I strongly feel that the hold these big tech companies have on many of us is tenuous at best. Google best not forget this.

Reddit certainly has forgotten and with but a metaphorical wave of my hand, reddit now too ceases to exist (for me) - and I've lost little. Big Tech... replaceable (hmm... mostly).

PS: Still rely/use Google (gmail, YouTube, Maps, Android), so there's one big tech firm I still depend on. YouTube, Maps and Android being the really hard ones to replace.
There is a lot of evidence that it is not such a simple proposition.

I've seen the submitted video discussed on a variety of internet forums over the years, and in most of them there were in fact a large number of people who take it as really meaning that you should never talk to police without your lawyer present.

E.g., you are walking down the street, and see two people arguing, one of then shoots the other, and then runs away. A police officer who was nearby hears the shot, comes over, and asks you which way the shooter ran. A lot of people say they would not answer that question without first consulting a lawyer.

Or you are in a building that collapses in an earthquake. You make it out but several people do not. Some police arrive, and manage to retrieve several people. They ask some of the people who were in the building if anyone of them know of anyone else who was in the building and is not accounted for. A lot of people say they would need to consult their lawyer before answering.

But there are also a lot of people who say it doesn't apply in those situations. They think it means don't talk to them when you are being questioned as a potential suspect.

Given the empirically observed divergence on people's understanding of what "don't ever talk to police without a lawyer" means it is perfectly reasonable to ask questions like everybodyknows asked.
How the hell have I never come across Cmd ~ before?!!

Thank you so much!!!
HTMX is not anymore framework agnostic than JS. It's a JS library. You can use any backend with either.
I build infrastructure (raised beds, drainage, chicken runs, composting areas) for our garden and even with that minor engineering get a good look at the level of manufacturing sophistication required to do basic things well, down to the accuracy of our mitre saw (which doesn't reset to 90 degrees very well) or staples that flatten instead of penetrating wood, or the timber I buy that isn't extremely straight. The lumber yard I go to often discards 40% of the timber in a pallet when going through it with me because it's warped or knotted or cracked and can't be used for my needs.

The manufacturing sophistication required to build a reusable space rocket is astonishing and frankly incomprehensible. It'd never be achieved in my country. We have 'barely good enough' materials for the simple stuff, and sophistication of manufacturing stands on the shoulders of layers and layers and layers of other advanced tools and processes and measurements and minute tolerances.

Even building a shed, based on the instructional videos I see on YouTube, in the US is so simple and requires so few corrections for i.e inaccuratly squared plywood. But people shrug off amazing improvements like watches that detect heart palpitations.
Talenter – Next Generation Job Searching and Recruitment (Waitlist)
We are building Talenter, a tool where developers can create a private page for recruiters to chat and ask questions of a virtual candidate. Recruiters can pre-screen candidates, and leverage the database to find a perfect match to their job description.
> Large parts of the whole stack have been developed with trading off developer velocity vs performance.

The time is always paid by someone. If developers decide to write the best code, they pay the price once in terms of development time. If the code is written with a developer velocity first perspective, every user pays the price every time they use the code.

Also, developer velocity vs. program performance is not a correct perspective to look at it. I have used at least half a dozen libraries with great developer ergonomics and have world leading performance (e.g. Eigen, Catch2, easylogging++ from top of my head).
Do you believe in the capability of chat gpt 4 or there is another url you trust?
> it's quite different from Windows, where it's the norm to maximize everything.

Where did you get this idea? It's definitely not the norm and MSFT supports an excellent tiling window system: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/powertoys/fancyzon...

Even without that utility though, it's easy to snap windows to one side or another of a monitor - particularly useful for ultra widescreen monitors
So a case of waving hands violently.

Also: Your original claim was "People are going to buy and sell drugs, sex, & etc. It's better to have that out in the open where police can keep an eye on and discourage violence."

Not: "solid links between regular neighborhood mounted and foot patrols and reduction in violent and property"
All posts on r/pics and r/GIFs must now be about John Oliver
I remember when I brought a Windows laptop (it was my personal dev machine at the time) to an Apple interview, and the interviewee saw me organize my windows in a couple seconds to the sides and he was like "whoa, windows is neat".

"oh, uh. Yeah."

:)
> Season 3 is widely boycotted by fans.

This has strong “boycott Modern Warfare 2” energy.
One thing that made arm on docker much easier was by using the kubernetes builder for docker. Spin up an arm nodes in kubernetes, create the docker builder pod, and it'll build/push your docker image easy as can be.
It was the zero interest money that effectively removed price as a signal from capitalism. Capitalism relies on negative feedback to correct errant behavior, usually in the form of lower stock prices, or bankruptcy.

Combine the end of zero interest money with the retirement of the baby boomers, AND the people Long Covid took out of the work force, and we're looking at a decade or more of 10% interest rates.

Fiscal Discipline is coming back, the physical economy (an odd, but precise, phrase used by Lyndon LaRouche) always lurked in the background, masked by the free money.
The Funnel Must Flow™
Right -- my point is that, despite SimpleDB being an ancient and objectively awful service that's been deprecated for ages, it still hasn't been discontinued.

> Would it shock you to learn that SDB is still running and working for a handful of customers?

Not in the slightest.
It could possibly be ancestral from some specie that relied on flowers in a more direct way.
I think the difficulty with rebase and merge is much about semantics. When you "rebase" what does that word suggest to you? To me it sounds like "Base Again". So I'm changing the base from which I started the current branch to something else?

Not quite. That would mean that my old base is REPLACED by something else, right?

Instead rebase means take some other branch then put all the changes in the current branch on top of it, keeping everything in the current branch but just adding them on top of something else, right?

It grokked with me when in my IDE (WebStorm) I saw the menu-option allowing me to choose another branch and perform "Check Out and Rebase on top of the current branch". So you don't just "rebase a branch", you combine two branches. And when you combine two things here the order matters, and it is easy to confuse the order.

Similarly if you merge two branches, which one overrides? The left or the right operand? It is easy to get confused. Maybe I am. It is not my fault.
> gnome

Gnome is the Apple of Linux world. A lot of Linux people hate gnome.
The economics already don't work. For example there are many jobs currently where they struggle to find workers because the pay is so low and no one wants to do it. Rather than raise wages, they're instead hiring children, often illegally and lobbying to get the regulations lessened.

Companies will do anything to avoid raising wages so they need to be forced to the table to do so.
Can attest that the distribution is odd from the test set that we sampled.

We've already run the compute to run the zero-shot GPT model on all of the datapoints in the provided test set. We're going through the process now of grading them manually (our whole fraternity is chipping in!) and should have the results out relatively soon.

I can say that, so far, it's not looking good for that 90% correct zero-shot claim either.
Wine can of course be anything at all. It could be milk, or used motor oil, or hydrofluoric acid. It need not even be a liquid, or tangible. Wine could be a really bad poem by an amateur, or a class of neutron stars that astrophysicists have yet to discover.

Shame on the Catholic Church for trying to pin down a word so that it means one thing and one thing only.
Please see my comment below [1], which I won't repost here.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36374781
It’s in the mould of San Francisco’s education board busying themselves with renaming schools while schools remained closed [1]. Is it an issue? Sure. Is it the pressing issue for San Francisco? No.

[1] https://www.npr.org/2021/04/07/984919925/san-francisco-schoo...
It's not that it didn't do an OK job, but more that you couldn't rely on what it had produced totally, nor rely on it having corrected the list without first having it reanalyse the "corrected" list.

It's still extremely helpful, I just found it strange that it seemed like a simple task - for something that has been fed millions of documents, for it to still give some incorrect results - especially AFTER it had analysed its own results and found some noun artikels to be incorrect.
Also, there's Magnet which does KDE-like window snapping since ages. It's not expensive, works flawlessly and doesn't tax your system in any way.
VS Code already has extensions for all that.
The reopening thread is hilarious as well:

https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/14bxljj/the_return_of_...
Have you tried C#? It looks a lot nicer to work with than Java.
More like Biscuit (in English anyway)
"Source-available" is already the established term for this kind of software, not sure what you are talking about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source-available_software
Must be having quite the day to post this. "Maybe later" is simply a superset of "no", but no is binary. So I'm not sure what the problem here is with maybe later as it is inclusive of no.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betelgeuse#Media_reporting

> Due to misunderstandings caused by the 2009 publication of the star's 15% contraction, apparently of its outer atmosphere, Betelgeuse has frequently been the subject of scare stories and rumors suggesting that it will explode within a year, and leading to exaggerated claims about the consequences of such an event. The timing and prevalence of these rumors have been linked to broader misconceptions of astronomy, particularly to doomsday predictions relating to the Mayan calendrical apocalypse. Betelgeuse is not likely to produce a gamma-ray burst and is not close enough for its X-rays, ultraviolet radiation, or ejected material to cause significant effects on Earth.

> Following the dimming of Betelgeuse in December 2019, reports appeared in the science and mainstream media that again included speculation that the star might be about to explode as a supernova – even in the face of scientific research that a supernova is not expected for perhaps 100,000 years. Some outlets reported the magnitude as faint as +1.3 as an unusual and interesting phenomenon, like Astronomy magazine, the National Geographic, and the Smithsonian.

> Phil Plait, in his Bad Astronomy blog, noting that Betelgeuse's recent behaviour, "[w]hile unusual . . . isn't unprecedented," argued that the star is not likely to explode "for a long, long time." Dennis Overbye of The New York Times agreed that an explosion was not imminent but added that "astronomers are having fun thinking about it.

---

Evolutionary tracks for Betelgeuse https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.3143v2

> The best-fit MESA model left the main sequence about 10e6 yrs. ago, while for the EG model it was only about 3 × 10e5 years ago. Both models reached the base of the RGB about 40,000 years ago. We followed the star through the final ex- haustion of core helium burning in both codes, followed by brief epochs of core-carbon, neon, oxygen and silicon burning until core collapse and super-nova an age of 8.5 Myr since the ZAMS for the MESA code. Our best guess is that the star will supernova in less than ∼ 100, 000 yrs (even longer in the EG model). We note, however, that there error ellipse encompasses the entire track so that the star could be further along in its evolution. The constraint that it has passed the first dredge-up, however, means that the star is ascending the RSG phase. Our result is based upon mass loss from the base of the RGB is therefore a lower limit to how far it has evolved as a RSG.
I don’t think I can use macOS without rectangle.
To be fair even if those commands are still overloaded there are new commands that aren’t overloaded. (git restore for example now has its own command).
You're seeing ADs on google? Lol.
It doesn't matter that Ellsberg disagrees. That's not a rebuttal. The standard being proposed here is an objective one.

The preceding comment may be wrong, but it has to be rebutted on its merits.
Based on seeing how most longtime Windows users use Windows. I rarely see tiling used, it’s almost always maximizing. Even on gigantic monitors and web pages with an 800px central column, they maximize.

The Windows users I encounter IRL tend to not be particularly technical though so that may bias things.

I personally get some usage out of tiling but as mentioned in another comment the tiling proposal triggers in W11 are over sensitive and kind of annoying.
Repeatable work: why are you not outsourcing or finding a startup in the space?
Would the X3D cache setup for the newer AMD CPUs count as vertical chips?

I'm a bit naive of the actual... physical bits. I'm not clear what makes a chip, and if the cache would be that - or something a bit simpler
The Staggering Frontiers of CSS
"not practical" for who? If you need to debug your clickhouse clusters, you look at the clickhouse tool. That's it. This isn't an alerting/monitoring solution, it's a specialized tool for debugging and fixing issues with running clusters.

that kind of thinking (that it's too hard to learn a second tool) is how datadog gets away with charging $$$$ for mediocre versions of 10 different products that cost an order of magnitude more than they would individually. the benefits you get from combining everything into one tool are vastly overstated compared to the benefits you get from having the in-house expertise to use the right tool for the job.
It's a great way to waste both the screen real estate and the user's attention.

MacOS has a number of interesting features in the kernel, and it has a reasonably good and highly uniform UI, with global shortcuts and all. But its window management is insufferable.

Good thing there are utilities that try to help that. (I already forgot which, I handed back my last work-provided MBP in 2018.)
Then you may continue operating only inside the walled garden. Apple providing functionality to allow side loading does not force you to side load apps.
> Requiring a specific controlled setting with a medical team and someone to guide the individual through throughout the process is a lot of work to require for "good" outcomes.

Honestly this sounds like an incredibly small amount of work when considering the work involved in traditional therapy and/or psychiatric treatment, which plays out on a timescale of years if not an entire lifetime for some, and collectively requires a “medical team” numerous times.

And when the outcomes involve radical (lasting) improvement to everyday experience for individuals with treatment-resistant depression, I strongly question the urge to trivialize this with scare quotes about “good” experiences and their apparent cost.

> The only time you can expect a drug will get approval without large reproduction of quantifiable outcomes is treating some aspect of a rare disease

The good news is that there’s been quite a bit of progress, and growing interest in medical circles due to the positive outcomes. I’d strongly recommend looking at the latest studies/results; it sounds like you may be operating on some very dated information.
This appears to be a mirror of HN as it was 11 years ago. The site could've been entirely rewritten in something else since then.
Nvidia already added optimized mixed-precision fused multiply-accumulate units. That’s about as good as you could ask for for specialized hardware for the kind of math current AIs use. The main bottleneck is memory bandwidth. So maybe future chips will trade off fewer or slower compute units for faster RAM.
I'm in France and I started seeing it earlier this morning.
because when Multi-finder came out it satisfied our needs and don’t see a reason to change. I bet Apple has put a lot more effort into why they do things, then many give them credit.
It's not that I like Reddit the company, it's that I dislike the mods even more than I dislike Reddit the company. If they were actually working for the benefit of their communities as I understand it, I would probably feel differently.
It is clear cut because when you obtained your driver's license, you have had already signed and agreed to reveal your name on a "traffic" stop because you are on public road with intent for commerce (or not).

Walking on the sidewalk, your D/L, not so much unless you were operating a vehicle, registered or not.
I'm pretty sure that pre-Curie Europeans did a lot of digging tens of meters in the ground.

If that knowledge somehow gets lost, which over such a long timeline seems almost likely, people will die from radiation poisoning without knowing what hit them.
Apologies, I was trying to give a little context for those that don't know about the three "the's" in German.

The list was mostly correct, but yes it added nouns that were not "der" nouns into the list.

It then attempted to correct the list and failed at correcting it.

In terms of output, it also didn't want to give a list of 200, but I did manage to get a list of around 100 back.
Is there theoretically a method to have an LLM to not hallucinate and just say “I don’t know” or just answer questions based on a certain domain of knowledge which it is well trained on?

Could a business ever trust an LLM based chatbot as much as the old school chatbot where certain questions reliably give certain answers and fails when it doesn’t know?
Wave of empty offices hits global market Asia
Thing is, git is pretty much everywhere. I don't think I've had a single job in the last 15 years or so where the client or employer wasn't using git. 20h to learn a tool that will be used daily for decades (yes, I expect this trend to go on for at least another 10-30 years), and the choice is not mine to make, is not much.

I should say, if the choice was mine, I'd probably still choose git. It's powerful, it's something I can already make really good use, and I feel comfortable easing new people into it. Regardless, the point is that I don't have that choice as an individual who's part of a team or an organisation.

On the other hand, I can choose my code editor without interfering with my fellow engineers's own choices. Here I chose the one I could learn in 20 minutes and get better the more I used it.

It took me very little time to get productive with VS Code, and then a few more days to get used to most shortcuts I use. Everything else is accessible via the command palette and more shortcuts can be learned as their functions become used more frequently. Until that, the palette is an excellent interface. It also serves as a discovery mechanism for features.

With emacs I had to learn a lot before I started getting productive. I got very good at it. Multiple cursors, window jockeying, buffer wrangling, the works. Any functionality that fell in disuse for some time, I'd risk forgetting their shortcuts. If I did, the only way to use it would be to somehow remember the shortcuts, probably by interrupting work and googling, or by trying to navigate its archaic menu systems.

With vim it's not very different. I still use it more or less daily but mostly for single file editing over SSH, since even if I need to do more complex editing on a remote server, I can use my local VS Code.

I don't think people have to use VS Code. I work daily with other engineers who use it, but also any of the Intellij editors, vim, emacs, you name it. We can all live in harmony and collaborate just fine. Not so much if each would chose their own VCS.
Makes one wonder what fraction of papers are equally bad, but just haven’t been subjected to similar scrutiny.