skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Consider that getting many views and avoiding losing subscribers or viewers are probably very much inline with the motivations of (insert your favorite highly biased political pundit). Particularly when dealing with small subsets of the population, popularity is a very unreliable North Star to guide you towards neutrality. Consider for a moment that, like nearly all audiences, your audience too holds biases. In that case, it’s very possible that more of certain types of bias, not less, would produce a more loyal and engaged audience I.e. more views less unsubscribes.

I am not familiar with your work, your biases, or your success in achieving neutrality. Based on the comment I am responding to, you may be well served by investigating a phenomenon called “audience capture” which a lot of excellent journalists have written about at length. Audience capture is a very hard pitfall to avoid entirely, especially when you are in a position where you financially rely on audience engagement and size.

If your goal is to avoid bias, a very noble goal, what you describe in this comment in all likelihood will sooner or later cause you to lean into more bias rather than less.
Solution I'm using on windows is conda, think its called "miniconda" what you have to install. You'll need to make sure you activate the correct conda environment in the separate terminal windows to use both at once, works with CUDA.

But yeah everyones going to have their own way in that ecosystem.
Nothing says the only way to have a car drive as safely as an optimal human requires a human analogue. You're making a massive strong claim without anything to back it up. For example, humans can drive cars in video games fairly well from a third person perspective which clearly is not the same as sitting in a car.
To the replies; I think one feature of llama.cpp is it can handle models with more RAM than VRAM provides, this is where I would think more cores would be useful.
In molecular biology, it's generally considered good practice to avoid giving things stupid names, principally because telling someone "your child has a mutation in their Sonic Hedgehog gene, and will suffer intellectual disability" isn't the greatest thing in the world.

I don't see why this shouldn't hold for these sorts of discoveries ("BEBOP" in this case) - it's just a sort of weird namespace pollution for the language. Or perhaps I'm just an old curmudgeon.
You can beam it to remote areas where there is little sunlight (or it is night-time) and where they may not have access to cheaper energy supplies.
Funny how when you allocate resources by heavily leveraged gambling, any failure of events to go according to plan is a "crisis".
I kinda think these vulnerabilities were long exploited but no one made the move to actually make any harm is because 1) not profitable for private parties 2) state actors are waiting for a proper time to execute
Every time I think about implementing this I realize the categories I have today and the categories I have five years from now are unlikely to mesh well.

At least based on my priorities from five years ago.
I'm neither American not Russian.

Although I was initially a bit surprised, it makes sense. I mean, I suppose there are plenty of Russians in America living a totally normal life.
That's when you fall back to your backup processes....you HAVE backup processes, don't you? (They're resilient against ransomware, aren't they?)
How do we know the video isn't ai generated? (fnord)
Your math is spot on. Our unit is two bed/two bath, living room, full kitchen with a washer and dryer. Three pools , three restaurateurs on site, a well stocked convenience store, a running trail and a lake.

It’s Florida so it’s very seasonal. But we live there during low season.
I said that there is nothing mentioned on Russian support. I tried to hint at the fact that there might be a redirection to localized versions responsible here.

Apart from that again I think this type of language reflects on Slack as a company. Mabe positive for some, negatively for others. I guess my phrasing indicates how I think about it, subjective of course.
I don't think I said that. You seem to be setting up a(nother) false dichotomy here as if there can only be one end of the spectrum or the other, with no grey area or nuance in-between.
Funnily enough your negative comments here regarding this are probably funneled to another program used to rank people by their level of seditiousness
Blogspam, including just taking over the source images.

Original: https://blurha.sh/ and https://blog.wolt.com/hq/2019/07/01/how-we-came-to-create-a-... (2019)
No, I can't, because there's a lot more going on than just having recognized an object. How can we tell that it is cardboard? Or if we see someone throw a ball into the street, how can we get an idea of how much mass the ball has? Or any number of such scenarios... the answer is, we have a lifetime of experience of interacting with our environment. We've seen cardboard boxes, felt them, crushed them up and tossed them around. We've thrown balloons and rolled bowling balls. We have a learned understanding of both ourselves and the objects in our environment and how they behave.
(Not the person you were responding to, but)

I don't really see the dilemma here. While driving, humans use sight, sound, touch (like rumble strips), and occasionally smell (engine scents, crashes, wildfires) as inputs. Sometimes these inputs conflict, but we make judgment calls. Sometimes those judgment calls are wrong, but I'd still rather have the multiple inputs than not.

With a box on the street, cardboard or not, I wouldn't want to drive over it mindlessly. What if there was something sharp and heavy inside the cardboard box? Better to detect its presence and either come to a graceful stop if possible, swerve around it gently if possible, or warn the driver to take action and then ungracefully brake as a last resort. I wouldn't want any system to drive right over a possible collision based on an assumption of its material.

If the camera sees an obstacle, the lidar confirms it's not an illusion, the radar senses it too... that doesn't seem like some unresolvable dilemma. That's a triple redundant system telling you there's something potentially dangerous on the street ahead, and a judgment call has to be made. In this case it seems like those systems would more likely agree than not.

A more realistic scenario might be when the camera is obstructed due to glare, or the lidar due to fog or whatever and they disagree about the state of things. Then yes some arbiter would have to make a judgment call. Sometimes it'll be wrong. Sometimes deadly wrong. But that's the case whether it had three inputs or two or just one, or or one camera in a stereo setup has dirt on it, or a bird poop on the windshield is misidentified, etc. Being able separate input noise and errors is part of the job of these systems, something that's made easier with different sensor types that can cross check each either.
You can download this VS Code extension here: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=CodeZoom...
As much as we all have criticized the npm ecosystem, after seeing what exists in the python world I actually came round to it and consider it very good.
Ok, but where do you put your laptop while in schneidersitz?
Yeah "using chatbot to be more human"... one would think that a chatbot makes it less human, not more.
https://xkcd.com/1216/
A “hypothetical blockchain” sounds useless if it cannot legally be applied in practice. It’s the sort of draconian policy that HN commenters would abhor if it were anything but blockchain.

To use these networks—and to test & objectively measure them—you need to be able to acquire tokens.
Perhaps the most terrifying headline I've read in a while.
That would be 1,077,047,953.603 football fields, or 387,737,263,297.2403 feet, or 1,163,211,789,891.721 hands

Freedom Units are the best units.
I like this project where Trammel Hudson drives a Mac SE CRT with a BeagleBone Black, translates keyboard signals, etc. So you have a real Mac on the outside, with modern internals.

https://trmm.net/Mac-SE_video/
It seems the only factor the author is encouraging the reader to take into account when deciding to blow up their life is themselves. There is zero altruism or kindness in this advice.

It feels like a very beginning of the 2000 position. The generation that was first allowed to divorce and blow up everything. And it's very good that we got this liberty, much better for everyone involved than the previous status quo. But it's still a failed experiment with a lot of collateral damage and hurt people.

The job of our generation is to find how to build our life in a more stable way, this time with kindness to avoid falling back to the conservative and violent approaches of the past.

So the selfish advice feels really outdated and out of place.
One way to look at it: the SEC doesn’t decide what is legal. They have an opinion, but it is the courts that decide. This is the process working as designed.
The paid upvotes idea is unique.
You can also quite clearly see the Southern Cross (Crux) and the pointers (Alpha & Beta Centauri) about one quarter of the way from the left edge.
Apparently, it worked fine for dropbox for years :)
Just not true. It is a different kind of adventure, but certainly can be just as much, or more of one.
“Wall Street” investments go down in price too (in real and nominal terms). Many businesses fail and cause equity owners to lose money.

Just like home (land) prices in certain parts of the country.

But the prices in the overall market, just like “Wall Street” is backed (and juiced) by the federal government.
>One of those objects I am perfectly fine to drive over.

I recommend you Google "kid in cardboard box run over by car"
> BBEdit is like an insurance policy just in case…

I'm curious to understand how proprietary software can act as an insurance policy against open source software. I can understand how the reverse would be true.
So what are your bets for the year of start of the build of a Dyson swarm?

Humanity will probably create an Earth-orbiting swarm first, to prove the concept.
MDMA also is also subjectively the best feeling the best on that list apart from MDA, have friends who have dabbled in designer chems but always go back to MDMA. Used the others to cycle tolerances
> egalitarian societies

This is delusional anyway. We're by far the most unegalitarian of all animal species besides maybe things like ants. We have individuals that command entire countries worth of resources and armies to go with.
The answer to the question "do you want a Swiss salary right now?" answers your question too.
This is an impresdive use case
If it’s a diff tool for TSA agents, then sure.

It’s the retention and inability to prove illegal retention that becomes major problems.
It seems like nothing of use is gained by replacing folder names with numbers that index those names aside from making the path shorter. In a library this is useful because books have to be stored physically in order, but a computer does not have these restrictions. You could just as easily apply the same set of rules without the numbers and see similar results, with the advantage that the names of things reflect what they are. You also wouldn't have to create silly rules like "1- is always project management", because under the new system, "project management" will always be project management.

He does seem to address this at least somewhat[0], but the justification is so flimsy it's hardly worth addressing. In essence, he doesn't like alphabetical ordering because the index can change when something new is added. He would prefer new folders to be inserted at the end of the list. He is evidently unaware that folders can be sorted by creation date.

[0] https://johnnydecimal.com/10-19-concepts/11-core/11.02-areas...
"Emka Emmanuel Katto" Thank you Emmanuel Katto Uganda for the successful launch of food drive.
In the case of an earth-like planet (considering not just composition and size, but also orbit + host star similarity) that's difficult to do when the transit only occurs every 365 days

Even finding just one such planet will require a lot of observation:

The "geometric probability" of the orbital plane being aligned for an earth-like orbit seems to be around 0.5% [0]. Assuming every star has an earthlike planet [1], only 1 in 200 observed stars will be correctly aligned.

So observing 365*200=73,000 stars over an entire day (also not possible for ground-based telescopes due to the day/night cycle) should statistically result in one transit observation. The transit duration is also a problem, for an earth-like exoplanet it is 13 hours, so if the observation time is too short, one would only catch the beginning or end of the transit

[0] https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Transit-Properties-for-S...

[1] The current hypothesis seems to be that every star has at least one planet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet-hosting_star), but it's all a bit up in the air as not many exoplanets (and especially earth-like ones) have been observed yet. The sample size is too low.
Maybe it’s for his own wall because he’s WFH and doesn’t have any other Amazon swag.
He's building a library, ggml; it's generally not hard to add support for new models. For instance llama.ccp already supports the Falcon 7B model (different architecture to llama). And given how politicised AI has become, there's unlikely to be many companies releasing weights for models competitive with the current models (e.g. LLaMA 65B). They may have private models that are better, like GPT3.5 and GPT4, but you can't run these on your own server so they're not competing with ggml.
I suspect you overestimate the computational or logical complexity of sensor fusion.
Are you offering up any concrete path towards dealing with the kinds of scenarios that I am presenting?

And what does a human controlling a virtual car have to do with a machine controlling an actual car? The human can easily control the virtual car in the same manner as a real car precisely because of their embodied knowledge of cars, roads, and other parts of our experienced reality!
This?

https://images.google.com/hosted/life/a5cc7e9970b7dd71.html
I think the fundamental difference is HN started as Graham's dogfood and Reddit was began as a startup.

A subreddit might solve someone's problem, but to a first approximation it is never solving the problem of the person who coded it up. It is not a Reddit software engineer's passion project.
It’s a great easy sipping lager.
Can you link the blog?
https://app.electricitymaps.com/zone/DK-DK2

is good for seeing details for each country (or part of country). I'm not affiliated to the site.

There is a lot of different duck patters. For some countries Wind Power has the same duck pattern as solar, for others it's more even.

It is also interesting to see how much electricity is imported/exported during the day to other countries. West European countries are definitely not isolated islands.
Show HN: Create annotated Anki decks for language learning
I wanted to share progress on a small tool I built that helps you create annotated Anki decks for language learning with Play.ht to help with pronunciation. I think the french deck I released came out decent, but currently in the process of fiddling around with other languages. Feel free to contribute!
I'm pretty sure HN serves as advertisement for Y Combinator. HN doesn't make or care about profits.
EDF is a state company owned by French state.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89lectricit%C3%A9_de_Franc...

For ones too lazy to open the Wikipedia page, it was state owned since its inception.

Founded 1946; 77 years ago

Founder French state under the direction of Provisional Government Minister for Industrial Production Marcel Paul
It seems the biggest question is, “do you really want to move to Switzerland?” That’s a big change.

The next biggest question is, how will this affect you financially, not just the pay, but the final savings after all the taxes and expenses.

And I think third is the career trajectory, if you really want to be in management or are happy as an individual contributor.

There are lots of jobs out there. You can find a better fit if this isn’t the right one.
For that to happen this flickering animation style has to become popular first. I don't think it will be. It can only be applied to very niche situations. It will never be a mainstream thing like old cameras were.
If i did this with my e-mail i would have over 1000 in some folders.

"It’s very unlikely you will end up with a hundred categories." -the page

Exactly this will result in about 20-30 folders for most, with any real amount of documents some folders might hold 100-1000 docs.

The advise you should take from this is that forcing structure is useful. Look att large code repos for example.
Launch HN: Resend (YC W23) – Email API for developers using React
Hi HN! I'm Zeno, founder of Resend (https://resend.com). We're building a modern email sending platform focused on providing the best developer experience.

Why? When you look at all the biggest competitors like Sendgrid, Mailgun, Postmark, and SparkPost, you'll notice that they were all founded around 2009/2010, and they all have been acquired by now. Because of that, it's common to see them only prioritizing enterprise requirements and optimizing for sales-led growth.

Nobody is building an exceptional developer experience. Nobody is trying to innovate. There isn't a single developer-first email platform in the market today. We want to change that.

Email sending is the kind of thing that you should integrate and forget, but instead, you have…

- Templates that are hard to build: Typically, you can only send emails using HTML or plain text. Although we support both, we're introducing a new way of developing and sending your emails. With Resend, you can code your email using React instead of outdated <table> layouts thanks to our open source project (https://react.email).

- Slow performance: Current solutions only offer a single region for email sending, even when all your end users are located in another part of the world. We allow you to choose what region your emails should be sent from (US, Europe, or LATAM), which minimizes latency and improves time-to-inbox.

- Poor observability: Most tools keep you in the dark without knowing what really happened after you sent an email. Resend exposes all the events associated with your email via webhooks.

- Designed for marketers only: Existing solutions are too generic and built exclusively for product marketers and product managers. We're building a platform with a clean REST API and SDKs for Node.js, Python, Ruby, Elixir, Go, and Java. We also have examples of how to send emails using Vercel Edge Functions, Cloudflare Workers, Supabase Edge Functions, and other serverless solutions.

What's our backstory? When I was a CPO at Liferay, I faced the problem of sending emails at scale. We had enterprise customers complaining about deliverability, and I've been frustrated with existing services ever since. More recently, as a VP of Developer Experience at WorkOS, I once again had to deal with emails landing in the spam folder. After looking at all the different solutions out there, I've been obsessed with the idea of solving this problem once and for all.

We need to stop developing emails like it's 2010 and rethink how email can be done in 2023 and beyond. We believe that email development needs a revamp. A renovation. Modernized for the way we build apps today. That's why we're building Resend.

What issues have you had with email sending? I would love to hear your ideas, experiences, and feedback on any and all of the above.
Do you have a source for this claim other than spez himself, who has proven to be willing to, uh, let's say bend the truth?
The "But games don't standardize the UI" is actually a worse argument than it appears on the surface. Since every game is re-inventing the wheel, they're all making inferior wheels. UX/accessibility is so far behind OS/web in full screen games that I'm impressed that disabled people can even play most games at all. It's not uncommon to boot up a brand new game in 2023 that has the menu design and UX consideration of a late 90s website.
> others will go away permanently unless the issue is adequately addressed,

Without a very clear statement of demands -- what it would take to end the action -- that everyone (or at least majority) of those participating understand and agree too -- it makes this even less effective as a form of pressure.

Those planning on going away "unless the issue is adequately addressed", what does that mean? Completely ending and reverting all plans to charge for API? That's not what they say, they say "adequately addressed", so that probably isnt' consensus (and probably isn't winnable? Or reasonable?). Making the charges some kind of reasonable... so every mod just decides on their own if any change announced is "adequate" or not?

What makes a boycott most likely to be effective as a pressure tactic is if the target knows exactly what they have to do to end the boycott, and has some confidence that if they do it the boycott will indeed end.

Now, whether this is actually winnable here (and via this tactic) is another question, but you might as well do your best if you're trying it.

I feel like at least some of the people participating in this boycott are just sick of reddit (and the internet, and society) and would be just as happy to see it burn though.

There's very little discussion of strategy and tactics in this thread -- how we can actually win, when organizing collectively for collective demands. If we want to be able to win, it's a good thing to think and talk about, not just react instinctively.
Like Guinness, beer tastes different/better when sampled near it's source. Staying California is likely a good thing for the quality of the product consumed.

E.g. up in Northfield Minnesota they make Marshmallow Mateys, a ripoff of lucky charms made by Malt-o-Meal. In the dorm cafeteria at St. Olaf College the flavor is like nothing else anywhere in the world. Once you taste it there where they make it, everything else is a sad stale imitation.
I’ve experienced both. We’re ultimately a lot more adaptable than we give ourselves credit for. We adapt to regret that never really went away but fades in terms of not being a point of daily focus. We adapt to the new place and call it “better” even when sometimes it isn’t.
Compare it to renting only.

The value of my house is immaterial to me since I need a place to live and since I bought it my run costs are basically stable and less than renting.

Will I be able to resell it in 10/20/30 years? Probably. But it would still be worthwhile compared to rental outflows.

Total structural loss immediately after purchase would have been sad, just like a crash after buying a new car. But insurance exists for that.
Surely sunlight is less filtered above the atmosphere than below/in it?
Also, maybe microwaves pass through the atmosphere with less absorption?

The current plan for solar power stations entail using mirrors to focus it to one spot anyway, so the evolution of that might be space mirrors that convert it to a single frequency before beaming it down to a focal point.

Also, the panels/mirrors can be sun-synchronous to receive sun all the time, reducing the amount of them needed (surface panels would not get peak sunlight all the time, and half the time will be shadowed by earth).
Right, and they probably are vastly under represented in the world of "who is buying american information". There's probably foreign adversaries in there also.

This is mostly the wrong side of the coin. You have it right.
Heck yeah. They might switch me onto Sublockade as they have more experience with the long term pharmacokinetics of stopping, but we’ll see. Might just stick with Buvidal, much more comfortable injection

If the US and state governments really wanted to solve the opioid crisis, getting Buvidal/Sublockade to anyone who asks for it, for free, would go a very long way.

It’s free for me paid for by my state government here in Aus, and it changed my life.