skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Compared to e.g. Discord where threading is weak at best and searching is borderline useless because it's a chatroom, not a forum.\

THIS. i have seen so many people put Discord forward the last couple weeks a reddit replacement, and have wondered what they were thinking. Its a totally different format. The two formats can compliment each other but can't replace each other. its like saying sms is replacement for email because they are both text based messaging services.
SEEKING WORK Location: Toronto, Canada Remote: Yes (EST but flexible)
Hybrid: Yes (around Toronto, Canada) Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Javascript, Typerscript, Angular, React, NodeJS, ExpressJS, RxJS, PHP, Ruby on Rails, HTML/CSS, Bootstrap, Sass, GIT, SQL, Linux, GraphQL.

Database: MySQL, PostgreSQL and MongoDB

AWS (Amazon Web Services) Experience: S3, Cloudfront, Cognito, AppSync, lambda, AWS SDK, SQS, SNS, Cloudwatch, Secret Manager, Parameter Store, Aurora..

Email: razakhalid@gmail.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/syed-raza-k-83aa8118/

As a seasoned full-stack software engineer, I'm known for crafting innovative solutions, consistently meeting deadlines, and propelling team productivity. My robust experience and dedication to continuous learning have made me a reliable force in end-to-end application development. Always at the forefront of technology, I am ready to tackle new challenges and deliver outstanding results.
Sounds to me they are saying this is a significant reduction in the Neanderthal genes that survive today, down to 4303 that can't be attributed to other human variants. This would make more sense to me, as the usual statement of up to 4% of a person's genes would be enough to create a unique species, wouldn't it?
I'm confident I'll buy a version of the headset at some point, but I don't know yet if I'll buy it right at release. I'm not saying that because I have any additional knowledge of future products (I don't), just that, like the rest of you, I want to see the ecosystem get fleshed out and not have to pay the early adopter tax. I think it will be great for work but who knows when a great remote code editor and terminal will show up on the App Store, right?

It's also not novel to me because I've spent a while using it already, so I'm not exactly in a rush to test it out just to see all the features.
Apple even publicly declared its interest in making its products recyclable and told investors who didn’t like it to “get out of this stock”, so it seems like it’s possible to challenge the pure profit assumption.
To be fair, Amazon's servers have better uptime than mine.
>If you actually pay attention to who's posting the majority of those screenshots, it will generally be the same set of dedicated users.

I guarantee you that someone, somewhere on Reddit will always post the latest ragebait piece on Elon Musk and have it upvoted for the front page. Indeed, as I type this the top post on Reddit is a tweet screenshot calling Trump a psychopath - truly a work of such creative genius that only a Reddit poweruser could hope to accomplish it. But perhaps the marginal platform value of being the first mover and having a botnet to ensure that you, the sophisticated poweruser, receive the glory you deserve in this winner-take-all process is in fact quite minimal.

>If you don't want these people using their power to control the front page, why don't you go start your own subreddit?

Or maybe the moderators can build their own platform rather than "whining". I think the platform would be much better off is moderators were on a much tighter leash, rather than the admins letting moderators basically be minimally-constrained petty tyrants ruling their fiefs, with rare exceptions.
Thanks for your hint about chrome://webrtc-internals -- I'll see what that tells me!
That would be a payment, just not with money, right? So why it's better than just paying this money directly and letting the person decide, rather than introducing an extra step by putting the money into a development and then giving the property instead? The direct payment looks more efficient to me.
And, if you do, that means they can't be self hosted? For example, if you write a comic, do you have to use some anonymous third party image service? Would a deviantart link be ok, even though you're associated with the page? Can I share a funny YouTube video? Does this make meme subs impossible?

I imagine this will be tough to create a community around, without some clarification.
I’d be kind of surprised if the building funded by the German government in euros ended up being built outside of Germany, but you know what they say: location, location, location.
More that it's a weird form of treatise with the mereset semblance of a coherent novel intertwined within it to encourage people to read it.
My point is that there is more than one way to make someone give up their secrets. Giving someone a monopoly seems wrong, because they will use it to block progress.

Governments already provide funding for scientific research. Why can't the same principle be used to "fund" the disclosure of technological secrets?
/b/ hasn't been "/b/" for longer than /b/ ever was "/b/" to begin with. if that makes sense.
The problem is that they are almost guaranteed to just be marketed as the "original", and the real original won't be available for sale anymore. Explicitly marketing a book as the "censored edition" wouldn't really go over well, would it?
Are the opt outs worth it? I don't see the benefit of giving them my real name, my info and telling them to delete it if they figured out it was me. Would it be easier to just change your name every once in a while legally?
I agree to some degree on a basic e2e plus swagger diffs, but

> The good news is that you only need one test (or two for bidirectional) for each class. In both large and small companies I've never found this necessary.

this tells me you deal with very simplistic data. You are not testing advanced alternatives (algebraic data types), required/non required fields or default values. If you did, you would need at least 2 tests per case.
Lot of people like to troll Ballmer for his "Developers! Developers! Developers!" act, but then again you can't really get any better than being developer centric and by consequence enthusiast, power users, and professional centric.

By contrast, Gates was "Embrace! Extend! Extinguish!" and Nadella is "Data! Data! Data!"

I miss Ballmer.
Copyright doesn’t apply to ideas or plots.

It’s perfectly legal to take something someone else wrote and write something similar.

Otherwise Star Trek Deep Space Nine would have infringed on Babylon 5.
Without any further information it sounds like you’re looking for a way to get rich quickly. A less popular option that has nevertheless worked for many people over the long term is work. What you’re describing sounds suspiciously like gambling.
The only close mindedness going around is your apperant fixation on Hydrogen as a goal in and of itself, rather than on producing and providng clean energy.

You are seeing what you want to see. And what I see is someone showing a complete lack of knowledge about material science.

> If there was a vast source of hydrogen, it will switch over to hydrogen infrastructure.

The existing natural gas infrastructure will not simply "switch over" because it fundamentally is incapable of safely transporting hydrogen. You need different material properties in your metal to handle hydrogen (see hydrogen embritlement as one reason), to say nothing of the other equipment involved. These cannot be "switched over", they must be completely replaced.

This in fact is the thinking that's backwards: continue to think about chemical energy carriers and moving them around in pipes. This made sense when we started with chemicals (fossil fuels), but it makes no sense when our starting point is electricity. Simply store and more that electriicty around.

> Negative prices literally create the very incentive for cheap green hydrogen.
> Again, virtually free electricity will imply virtually free hydrogen made from it once it reaches mass production.

No it won't. It doesn't matter how many times you say it.

Further, if you're buying electricity for a negative price, you're getting it from a coal/gas plant which is decidedly not green. Or if you're lucky from a nuclear plant.

Very cheap electricity is a necessary condition for cheap green hydrogen, not an incentive for it.

Again, cheap is not free, and at the energy requirements needed per kg of H2, even cheap adds up quickly. Further, the equipment to produce, store, and transport it are not cheap, and are certainly not free.

> Seriously, your whole plan is to waste the vast majority of green energy, while simultaneous denying the possibility of any method of utilizing it. It is pure self-contradiction.

All together now: the sun shines and wind blows even if you turn off your solar panels and wind turbines. Nothing is wasted.

> anti-hydrogen propaganda organization. It only exists to spread FUD about it.

Again, see my point about being fixated on Hydrogen as the goal rather than the means. You can label criticism as FUD but it won't make it any less true.

As for the H2 Science Coalition, they clearly are not. They are very clear that hydrogen has it's uses (and its own major decarbonization problems). But that it's simply very poorly suited to be "an energy carrier".
I know some (now retired) marketing execs, and they were saying “just watch” about greedflation all last year.

“Once there’s an excuse to raise prices, you raise them - high and fast - until sales fall”
thanks we’re on the right track but it’s still lacking the stats. ie what is the distribution of the instruments and how are they weighted ? are dense and sparse weighted equally? how about close and distant instruments to settlements ?

to me collapsing thousands of observations to a single average loses most of the signal
If Apple allows it then I fully expect 3rd parties to make controllers. Now that Meta has demonstrated fully self tracked controllers, you don't need much OS integration to make that work.

Of course, it depends if Apple allows it.
I don't really get it, anyone who is a neutral party in any kind of legal matter and takes money from an involved party for a specific action is guilty of criminal conspiracy, no? I mean can I citizen arrest people for other thefts in the US and offer to split them?
How did you represent the features flags in source control?
It’s technically prohibited by OpenAI’s ToS to share your key with any third party, so presumably options 1 and 3 could get your users’ accounts banned. That being said, until OpenAI releases some kind of OAuth, there isn’t a great option unless your app is entirely client side.
I don't think I follow. Your example left out all the definitions of these functions, so you can't really deterministically say what will happen. If `someOtherPromise()` fulfills, `valueIsOk(value)` evaluates to `true` or truthy, and `runNextStep(value)` fulfills, `example` will fulfill and not reject. If any of those conditions don't hold, `example` settles as rejected.
ok, but they were talking about bakers, not bankers..
Sure, I just like to bring an outside perspective when I can.
> macOS is my daily driver, and the last security-related hassle I can remember was related to installing an iSCSI kernel extension.

There are probably quite a few security-related hassles that you encounter every day, but you're just used to them and they don't bother you.

Which is totally fair. In practice, the most intuitive and easy-to-use systems tend to be the ones we have used for long enough that they are second-nature.

> I wish there were a secure-by-default Linux distribution that I could safely recommend to neophytes.

There very likely is such a thing, honestly. But for the average user, the most popular distros are very likely "secure enough", especially if Windows-level security is considered acceptable.
> the Eufy doorbell had issued an automated response: "Excuse me, can I help you?"

(No intent to discredit or argue against TFA's primary points)

Maybe I'm misreading the.. tone? I think I'd be pretty (as in, very) mortified if my smart doorbell spoke this, let alone even have an automated response at all? (Although, I don't really use smart appliances, if that's relevant.)

Or, when employing the automated response, I'd probably care to make sure it's fairly apparent that it's a machine, on a quick second-pass thought.
This piece on TR's African Safari and its impact on his views was posted recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35108692
Are you being serious? The landing page had 1 job and it failed at doing it. I'm all for reddit alternatives but c'mon, a page showing off a product that fails to clearly link to said product is just funny.
Non-profit construction firms with nationally guaranteed access to redevelop land and waive local zoning, subject only to nationally-set conditions, would help a lot of cities.

The enemy is the same as it's always been: landowners.

Set a few KPIs (housing profit metrics, supply/demand, price vs national average) and trigger forced non-profit supply if they exceed thresholds.

The problem now is there's an unbalanced equation in favor of homeowners. (Said as an owner and landlord)
Yeah, I see what you mean, and it's definitely not clear enough to say whether or not this is just for posters or also commenters.

I think this only works if you throttle votes (and assumedly, this only applies to voted on posts, not necessarily every comment), but that was one of the worst parts of Voat (from a technical standpoint, at least). There probably needs to be normal old infinite "I like this" votes and then treat your subscription votes as a form of gilding (except it actually does help pay someone, unlike reddit's gilding).

You can also propose that you do let non-subscribers vote, but a subscriber vote weighs more. Be it explicit* or not.

*(e.g. hover over votes and you see a split of which are "subsciber votes. Which say, counts as 5 votes or something. so A 30 point post with 2 subs votes = 20 normal voters + 2 subs)
> Confirming up front rather than in request-response, error-correction type exchanges saves some time and some feelings.

This is also useful in multinational companies. We have hires in other countries, and other cultures, and without reference, I find myself referring to them as they/them... same with some names that could be either Male or Female (Jack springs to mind).
> I’m confused what you’re advocating.

I'm advocating using a pi-hole to block problematic domains on your network using list like the one from StevenBlack and entire TLDs that could be confusing. If you don't think .zip & .mov could be confusing then feel free to not block them.
I don’t fully disagree but there is still a big difference. People voluntarily give these companies their data. The companies aren’t skirting the law. We shouldn’t gatekeep disallowing government spying behind better consumer protections.

The kicker in all this is that the taxpayers are literally paying for this. We are paying to give the government our own data.
This mildly feels like asking chatgpt about chatgpt
Video shows International Space Station crossing the sun during spacewalk
What do you mean ruined your objectivity? It seems like it repaired it.
Bellingcat are an investigative agency which uses open data and decentralised members (I think), but not doing it for members to see themselves:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellingcat

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/54680228-we-are-bellingc...
Isn't 1) what the GDPR is trying to do?
The comparison doesn't hold. Mosquitos do actually seek out and parasitize humans, and often transmit infectious diseases of serious import. Neither is true of wasps - they don't even pose the same risk of incidental contamination that many flies do, nor do they offer humans violence without significant provocation. That humans rarely bother to take the trivial effort required to understand wasps well enough to avoid offering provocation, I grant, of course. But such disregard is no less culpable for being ordinary.
WeWork Faces More Turmoil After Its Chief Executive Departs
Instruction Tuned Models Are Quick Learners
I have to recommend that this platform doesn't give users a profit motive. It encourages quantity over quality and only "front-page" worthy content. Niche communities won't get traction this way. A few Gallowboob-level posters will be making most of the profit.

That's not to say that a financial incentive is a bad idea, though. If you capped the amount that a user made per month to the cost of their subscription - $1, then there's no profit for users to make. They're just saving money on the subscription cost.
I don't think they're objecting to the fact that these products are produced privately, they're concerned that the focus is on large companies building huge purpose-defined systems that humans can just access/ask to do things. As opposed to building a set of linguistic tools that individuals can mix, match, and apply according to their preferences and personal viewpoint on the work.

When I say it like that, it kinda sounds like a restatement of the Unix philosophy - Do One Thing, and Do It Well. Will have to chew on that one...
You caught me!

https://youtu.be/0ZM9-ZbBoAc

That's probably NSFW.
> Please show me where laws are being made preventing you from owning/accessing a copy of the original.

This one is just called "intellectual property rights". If you don't already have a copy of the original, you won't be able to get one if the rightsholder chooses to withdraw it from sale.
have you ever been around a for-profit, privately run entity?
Jews and blacks?
This whole story to me is a sobering and depressing tale of just how effective propaganda is, even with a relatively well-educated and informed audience here on HN. Why do I say that? Because for months I've been saying this but typically such comments get downvoted into oblivion. So many people even here are seemingly unwilling to pause for a few seconds and consider the evidence or simply to question the narrative that we need to raise interest rates or that it's our only tool for fighting inflation or that somehow wages are responsible for inflation.

For the record, none of those things are true but yet so many people are conditioned to suck the boot of the capital-owning class, perhaps from the mistaken belief that those people are the capital-owning class or will be someday. You are not Elon Musk. You will never be Elon Musk. Elon Musk doesn't care about you. He would melt you down for parts if it meant an uptick in profits.

In the 70s, with the oil price shock we had Nixon, a Republican, quite effectively tackle inflation with wage-price freezes. We've had some countries tackle greedflation with a windfall profits tax.

Personally, I'd be happy enough with a mechanism that as long as inflation is above 4%, the corporate tax rate is 80% and all share buybacks and dividends are suspended.

The capital-owning class (who own both parties in the US political system) have effectively decimated any form of labor solidarity so people vote against their own interests. Who doesn't vote against their interests? The capital-owning class.
Why would bakers be near the top of that list? Isn’t diabetes and obesity the top health problem around the world?

The point of my comment is to show how ridiculous it is to try and rank “social importantness” of jobs.
Dude seems to have a weird personal vendetta against Lina Khan.

I detest most private equity and am somewhat curious to read his thoughts on it, but I tuned out after the like fifth instance of high-school-girl gossip mongering about the FTC under Khan.

Also, it's sort of weird to make efficacy judgments about cases brought by the DOJ/FTC in the current revived antitrust era when they are forced to climb such a mountain of adverse precedent generated by the Law & Economics and Chicago School movements over the last 40-50 years. Hayek's intellectual children have been digging a moat inside the judiciary and private practice at least since Bork wrote The Antitrust Paradox.

Put simply, if your goal is to upend the entire paradigm for evaluating competition harms, your arguments probably aren't going to be able to be regarded as very strong under the existing frameworks.
That could be true indeed. I am just arguing in the scenario of "what if we build lots of flats", hah!

I do wonder how did similar scenarios worked out historically?
Maybe for Apple development, but given that it’s positioned as an iOS-type device, the public will never get a native terminal on this thing. It would be unprecedented.
It absolutely does. Hopefully this gets brought to court.
Elon would rather lose 50 billion (and yes that includes what he owes the bank and his co-investors) than admit defeat. He sees his "genius who makes no mistakes, it's all 6D chess" image as his primary money maker.
Those who got invites should be able to invite more folks

> "Most of the existing users have the ability to invite others, so if you know someone that has an account, you can ask them for an invite."

https://tildes.net/login
There's no reason the government needs to invest in it.

The market will take care of it on its own as long as regulations allow it. The government just has to ensure zoning allows it, height restrictions are relaxed, environmental reviews are sped up, and so forth.

Of course, all those restrictions are there for certain reasons, which is why getting the balance right between those and new construction is so hard.

Edit: Also, the idea of prioritizing housing for "socially important" jobs is backwards. Why single out housing? If we truly value teachers, just pay them more in the first place. That way they can choose whether they want to put it towards a nicer home or fancy summer camps for the kids or something else.
I had similar thing over something more sinister... I disputed a charge I didn't recognize on Amazon Store Card and Synchrony sent me a new card. I can explain about the charge but not super relevant.

I thought all is good...

Then I got an email weeks later asking me to pay this amount to Amazon, around $500. I told them this was squared away, I already paid using other means and thing is resolved.

This dude from chargebacks demanded that I submit card they can use to charge and resolve this "order". Since I already bought the thing, I explained once and didn't want to respond more.

Then everything stopped working like described in this post. I could log into Amazon but I couldn't access any of the pages. Kindle stopped working... that was the thing that I thought is too much.

After few days back and forth, they restored my access, I had to call bank few times as this guy would disable and unlink my new Amazon Store card from the account.

After that, all my books, endless purchases not being accessible... I decided to take a break for a little bit.
Amazon Prime was due for renewal, so I didn't renew. I cancelled all subscriptions through Prime, once I was able to access it. I cancelled everything but Kindle Unlimited (sorry I just can't do this).

So this is where we are. I am not shopping nearly as much, I use alternative stores, Chinese retailers get way more direct business from me.

I am sure I will enable it, but I just don't have to do it anytime soon.
> What happened to make the "greedflation" story more palatable?

Maybe it's better communication or more of a willingness by people to admit they're struggling and broke. When you talk to everyone you know and no one is making any more money than they were 3 years ago, but the prices of everything have increase substantially, it's not illogical to think there's someone else getting all that extra money.

In Canada everyone knows people that work in the resource industries. No one doing the actual work is getting paid significantly more, so it must be the mill owners, mine owners, oil rig owners, etc. that are starting the chain reaction, right?