skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's what a seed round is. If you like you can always invest later when they do have the product. The valuation may not be the same though
Yes, but this is adding in treatments not listed in the original prompt. There was nothing mentioned about treating heart failure or reducing immflamuation. Vicuna is extrapolating here and not simplifying and making the message more compassionate. It is an interesting application of local inference though.
SETI scientists to devise plan for lunar listening station
Exactly. Having general skepticism is admirable. Having selective skepticism isn't.
i want something like this for lots of reasons, but the headliner is structual typing.

It should be possible to get simple attribute access while not creating a new nominal type and not going outside the Python stdlib.

I'm constantly using NamedTuples when what i really want is an anonymous struct.
formerly cocreator of Django, now Datasette, but pretty much the top writer/hacker on HN making AI topics accessible to engineers https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastYear&page=0&prefix=tru...
Levothyroxine to increase thyroid function
You still have to worry about errors. You will probably have to add an error handler function that it can call out to. Otherwise the LLM will hallucinate a valid output regardless of the input. You want it to be able to throw an error and say I could produce the output given this format.
https://archive.is/tihKn
The posted headlines keep saying "All the ingredients." I don't know where that's coming from, since Phosphorus is the only thing the articles are about.

Phosphorus is critical for life as we know it (LAWKI) but it's definitely not "all the ingredients."
SYCL is still very early on in development and I don’t see it really picking up until support is up-streamed to the llvm project, at the very least. That said, I am a firm believer in the single source philosophy. There just isn’t a tractable alternative.
> If it were a lab leak, there are probably a handful of eyewitnesses.

Not at all. The chances are that if it was a lab leak the people involved had no idea the leak happened at all. That's how lab leaks work: people make mistakes and inadvertently leak stuff from the lab. eg: Karen Wetterhahn vs lead

What you're talking about is a deliberate release from a lab, which would have eyewitnesses because they know what is happening and see it happening and can corroborate the reports of other witnesses. eg: Thomas Midgley Jr vs lead
Yup. macOS Catalina
Clearly the pennies couldn’t have been real or someone would have picked them up before crypto bot got to them.
I'm trying to think what I have learnt in the world of engineering from in-person contact with colleagues. Honestly, not very much. Most of the useful stuff I learnt online, when trying to solve problems I Had.

By far the most positive experience I had from learning from colleagues was actually when I was a remote member of a team who were otherwise in an office together. They were just very good people who also shared a preference for written communication. We did meet up in person every few months, and that seemed to be enough.
Examples of implementation (it's like a net to close off the front plane door area) https://www.alpa.org/advocacy/flight-deck-barriers

I've actually seen some airlines position a beverage cart across the entrance of the aisle on the first row to block everyone, while pilots are opening the cockpit door to use the lavatory in flight.
There also was a flight attendant behind the cart to tell anyone to back off/turn around.
There has to be a way to build a safe system from several not as safe parts. At least for a system which doesn't need to fly.
Fun fact: one of the few industrial applications of nuclear fusion reactors today is as pulsed neutron generators for excitation gamma ray spectroscopy in oil exploration. https://www.slb.com/-/media/files/drilling/brochure/neoscope...
Does anyone know of any guides or place with guides for analog privacy (not digital like PrivacyTools.io or the replacement site that popped-up when PrivacyTools.io sold out)?

Stuff like: this is how to register your house/car/cellphone etc in a trust, how to avoid giving out your SSN for utilities, how to avoid the medical industry from sharing your data, etc?

Is there a better way to ask or describe what I'm talking about?
Section 3 paragraph 1 states

> Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act…

It looks like it was signed into law by the President on 3/20/23
FWIW, the WeWorks I've worked in have better tech than most traditional offices I've worked in. The printing and room booking experiences are pretty great.
Hacker News has pretty easily accessible URLs for every comment.

Just click on the timestamp next to the comment, like "12 hours ago".

Sending the actual HN url to a comment or thread, instead of a screenshot:

* Is accessible to people with limited vision who can't or can't as easily read a screeshot. Many people even without vision impairment find text much easier to consume than a photo of text. For instance, text in reasonable CSS will flow to fit your screensize, where a screenshot will not.

* For those interested, easily provides the context of where the comment/thread appeared and what's around it, hard to trace back from a screenshot to HN

* For the future archival purposes, is often more likely to still be good than a link to a third-party image hosting site

* In the rare case where it matters, is "self-authenticating", it points to HN itself, while an image can be modified or faked, although certainly in most cases there is no motivation for someone to do so, still it's nice to have it built in.

When it's an HN comment, or anything else with a URL, I think it should be nearly as easy to show people what you're refering to with a URL to it, as it is with a screenshot?
Concurrency didn’t necessarily require threads. Concurrency is not a difference in how you use threads, its logical computer science concept. Parallelism is a physical property and parallelism is almost always concerned with doing things a faster by doing them in parallel, concurrency can be done for other purposes (eg to not have long running tasks block work). All parallel programming is concurrent but not all concurrent programming is parallel.

The distinction matters because the focus is different: they’re different topics. With concurrent programming you deal with synchronisation and topics like lock-freedom and wait-freedom. In parallel programming the main focus is about work distribution and scheduling to process it faster.
I snagged it, Thanks!
This is very interesting when you consider the device timelines.

Apple introduced their first external trackpad in 2010 and then introduced the hidden-by-default scrollbar with Lion in 2011. Once trackpad gestures had become good enough, scrollbars became largely redundant, as they would be with touchscreen devices. At this point they're mostly a progress indicator.

I think the Amiga bar is my favorite.
I'm even more surprised about this one experience I had where I was the only remote member of a team. There weren't really any special processes, but everyone seemed to have a strong desire to make me feel included, and it worked out really well.
Better him than Elon, at least. Ellison is smart enough not to constantly show himself as a buffoon in public.
I should have said that gas stoves were more common when the boomers were growing up, and that asthma was less common, or less commonly discussed. But the houses that boomers grew up in were a lot leakier, or if you will better ventilated.
> Everything else really isn’t worth the $65 bench fee

And it's not like that is a guarantee. You might not find the cause in an hour, or two, or three -- and quickly you approach the cost of a replacement unit.

Sometimes the problem is essentially "critical, proprietary chip/motherboard needs to be replaced" where the only option is to try to find another unit that's broken for different reason and do a transplant.
https://archive.is/f3YX3
This article gives the impression that everything is the compiler's fault when you end up with conflicting reads in different cores, but that's not right.

From the point of view of someone outside the CPU, yes you can say that simultaneous reads might never give different answers. But everything happening at that level barely resembles the original software. Dozens of instructions are happening at any moment, overlapping each other, starting and finishing in very different orders from how they're stored in memory. This happens even if you directly write machine code byte by byte.

From the point of view of the software, running a bunch of instructions in sequence, you do get stale values. You can have two threads wait for a signal, then both read a value, and both get different results. You can have a thread set a flag after it's done editing some values, have another thread wait for the flag, and then after waiting it sees the edits as still incomplete.

The exact types of nonsense depend on the memory model, but things as simple as two MOV instructions in a row can violate strict ordering. It's not just that the compiler might stash something in a register, but that the CPU itself will make swaths of very observable changes within the rules set by the memory model.

You can't trust the hardware coherency protocol to do much for you until you follow the platform-specific rules to tell the CPU to make something act coherent.
Residential leases and commercial leases are wildly different. Residential leases are fairly boilerplate but commericial leases are bespoke and negotiated.
> You cannot bring it to a final calculus exam in many public universities, for example.

That is not what is happening here
> This comment is laden with rhetoric

Can you elaborate on why this was worth pointing out for the parent comment, but not GP?
For context, the latest 7950x has 64KB of L1 per core, and 1MB L2
If it's information you can get on. a shittily formatted page, opening an API point would be a way to rework the townsquare
> reddit isn't going to decide it no longer wants to make a profit

They could, however, take a saner approach to making a profit. If profit was their actual goal, for instance, it's entirely likely that they could actually make more money by either reducing the API pricing or charge it to the user (by making it a function of Reddit Gold). Of course, that assumes that money is the goal of the API changes, which was never obvious to me.
My takeaway isn't how useful ChatGPT is, but how useless the doctor is, and by extension, how poorly the the field of medicine is that it doesn't adequately train doctors to have better bedside manner.

Regardless of my state of agitation, I would most definitely not want to be read a script prepared by an AI. In fact, were I to find out after the fact, I'd be even more incensed.
How about this scenario: Reddit goes ballistic and locks everything behind a 100% paywall under a (flawed) assumption that they have enough critical mass of content for people throw some $5/mo bone their way just to access existing content.
As has also been pointed out, the member of the NHTSA who signed this letter used to work for the law firm that was representing the automaker companies (and lost).

The NHTSA was asked to comment on the case while it was happening, but did not.

More information: https://youtu.be/2nXVljRUnoc
What an absolute lie.

The subsection 6 that you quoted is under the section:

3011. (a) In making a determination of the best interests of the child in a proceeding described in Section 3021, the court shall, among any other factors it finds relevant and consistent with Section 3020, consider all of the following

For example, another subsection is

(3) The nature and amount of contact with both parents, except as provided in Section 3046

This has absolutely nothing to do with falling under child abuse.
Ask HN: Should commit summaries describe the change, or the intent?
I recently received some advice that the summary line of a Git commit message should describe what the change does. In particular, they said to avoid summaries in the form of “Fix <broken thing>”.

For example, instead of “Fix wrong default font for FooComponent on BarPlatform”, write “Explicitly inherit BazComponent font for FooComponent on BarPlatform”. Or instead of “Optimise FooFunction memory use to improve performance”, write “Reuse existing heap allocations on BarObject in FooFunction”.

On the one hand, I can see that writing summaries this other way communicates more specific detail about what changed; “Fix <broken thing>” could mean anything happened. On the other hand, what the change does is already described by the code, so focusing the summary on why the change was made instead seems much more beneficial.

This is probably more of a ‘spaces versus tabs’ kind of thing where the answer doesn’t matter too much, but I am curious to hear from others on which approach you have found most beneficial in your work. In particular, if anyone uses this style of “describe the change” summarisation, have you experienced any particular benefits that might not be obvious? Thanks!
Here's a view that includes the traffic. Looks like a 20-30% drop but it seems to be back to normal today.

https://blackout.photon-reddit.com/
If you can buy some equipments and chemicals (eg JOBO labs and kits) with cash, then developing C41 (or negative) films is trivial and you can diy.
> If it has gone from being 0% to being 20% of the content consumption for example, the "long still" would still be nowhere competitive with the fat powerlaw "head" (the stuff still getting 80%).

Was it only ever claimed that it would eliminate the head?

It doesn't have to flatten the curve entirely to "expand the scope of the arts" or "nurture alternative voices" or "get indie films to larger audiences" or let "music be more surprising" (paraphrasing from the claimed benefits as restated by the author).

Or, if you move to the author's economic claims, "make a lot of money selling to these microscopically small groups of customers"... I would take more issue with that in general, but without a better defined "lots" we don't need Etsy to make its sellers more money than Walmart makes theirs - we just need them to make a "lot" more than they would otherwise.

The author prevents and argues against a perverse strawman of the least likely results of there being a flourishing long tail of both content production and content consumption and tries to disprove it by focusing on the profit margins of middlemen and high volume producers.

I would argue that a healthy long tail will force the profit margins of middlemen down because they have more competition so there's less ability to extract from consumers. Same for high-volume producers - some of the market will shift to lower-volume competitors. And that's exactly what we see happening: incumbents have had to respond to markets moving away from them. A film or TV show has to compete with entire new worlds of types of video content, so those incumbents go broad. But that's because the long tail is thriving on its own, and doesn't need them, not because the production or consumption worlds are short-tail.

You can't monopolize and extract rent from the long tail the same way you used to from the short tail because the barriers of entry for producing long-tail culture products have gotten so much lower. The struggles of the former kings and incumbents shows that their relative market share is being eaten into by cheaper-to-produce alternatives that their business model simply can't sustain itself by competing with. If demand was short-tail then the biggest incumbent players would face far fewer barriers to raking in profit. Relative demand for short tail stuff goes up -> ability to charge a higher price for short tail stuff goes up. But that's not happening. (Disney is the closest thing we have to this, they have a pretty firm grip on tons of non-free family TV and film, but that's one of the few areas (along with live sports) that have been less vulnerable.)
To be fair to the parent, all the people I've met who reported a good experience living in Germany stayed far away from Berlin.
That wouldn't work here though, the dependency started by breaking an almost-undetectable fraction of the time.

Imagine a scenario where your upstream dependency started out with one failure per 1,000,000 machine hours, then removed a zero once every 12 months. If you had 100 machines running tests at 100% efficiency, the bug would hit about once a year for the first year, then 10x the next year, and so on.

Put another way, if upstream is malicious, and you're not auditing every line of their source code, you're screwed.
The economy makes no sense anymore. Add a fee to all financial transactions or financial transactions will eat the economy.
> > Whoever solves trustworthy, honest reviews will be a very, very rich person.

> We will never have completely trustworthy user reviews.

just reading these to comments helped me figure out how to solve this: since apps have location tracking, for restaurants at least, your reviews should be weighted by how much time you spend close to a restaurant. If you claim to like a restaurant, but you don't eat there much, that means your reviews are not reliable. This unreliability would transfer to reviews of places that are not close to your home/work.

bonus points to combine it with confirmed food expenditures on your credit card/applepay.
They’ve never even tried, so how could they know for sure?
1. Consumers will not pay extra for a longer-lasting bulb. Most will just get the cheapest available. Heavy duty bulbs exist for the commercial and industrial sectors, but are more expensive.

2. Edison-screw fixtures are designed for incandescent bulbs. They trap heat inside the fixture, accelerating the death of LEDs. Integrated LED fixtures tend to be more reliable, but installing them is not an option for renters and unskilled homeowners.
so I'm imagining speedyOS which assumes one core for the OS, and runs its userspace jobs on the other cores, and if you wire a job to a core and its been coded to fit in L1/L2 then.. it just "does" -as long as the other jobs are somehow co-erced to run in the other cores, "swapping" in and out as need be. If you can prevent any clicktick disrupting your run state on this one "golden" user core, it just runs as fast as it can, subject to the OS timeslice effects on it, and any unavoidable synchronisation into other bits of the combined CPU/ALU/Memory/Bus system as a whole.
> I've never had someone "get angry, and push back" when you simply and clearly explain "things have changed here...X isn't the command you want and you need to use Y, and here's how you do it".

And you're replying to someone who has. Life is funny like that.
> NIMBY lawsuits are not what has affected recent nuclear builds.

Can you give some examples?

> There are strict limits on what such lawsuits can do.

On paper that might be true. But the actual law rarely matches the law on paper.
> The whole thing is atomic right?

Yes, by definition flash loans are atomic.

It's money borrowed and repaid within one transaction, which is atomic. One might wonder: is anything being borrowed at all?
The world exists in a state of probability, it is rarely black and white.
That depends whether the development model is branch-stable or trunk-stable.
Unfortunately I saw a video of a similar accident where the motorcycle driver slid under the truck which turned across the road unexpectedly in a similar way, and one of the wheels went over the rider. He survived for a couple of minutes, during which his riding buddy held his hand, and talked to him until the end.

Videos like this are quite disturbing but I would make watching some of them mandatory during the driving course. Some people just dont get they are literally driving lethal weapons.
There are pennies, but the steamroller is not extant.
The problem is that when you are leaning towards believing something anyway and find out that you were being lied to about it, you don't become more critical of all information, just information that is in conflict with what 'seems' right to you.

It is a terrible side-effect of doing things like teaching kids in the 80s and 90s that marijuana was a terrible drug because when they find out it isn't, then everything else they said is suspect and any authority that tries to say anything about drugs gets treated with suspicion.

In line with this, using fear of the worst possible outcome in order to scare people backfires heavily if it doesn't happen because then convincing them of anything related to that subject again is going to have to come from a completely different source and direction.
This doesn't correctly simulate how mouse clicks affect Mac scroll bars. Clicking in the track outside the elevator box should move a page at a time. Maybe it's not intended to accurately simulate interaction, only appearance.
It already is in private hands; Government leases from, or contracts out to corporations after all; Which means the nuclear arsenal is in private hands. Technically.
I've had good luck with both:

https://github.com/drorm/gish/blob/main/tasks/coding.txt

and

https://github.com/drorm/gish/blob/main/tasks/webapp.txt

With the second one, I reliably generated half a dozen apps with one command.

Not to say that it won't fail sometimes.
> During the company’s latest quarterly earnings call on June 12th the septuagenarian rhapsodised youthfully about artificial intelligence (AI) and the latest cloud-computing technology.

The joy of writing about the rich while ignoring society struggles.- The Economist
I wonder how well letting a fuzz tester generate the test configurations would work.
This is kind of genius! :)

In library form: https://todepond.gitbook.io/habitat/documentation/console
If I had to guess the difference is made in building cooling, not per device.
>So people like John and George are “The Beatles” but people like Pete Best are not

Yes.

>because of some arbitrary attachment you have to them personally

No, because those (Best and Stuart) aren't the persons that wrote and played the Beatles seminal songs and albums, or that billions of people identified as the Beatles during their recording career.

Best is just a member from when they were a small time cover band, that was sacked before they made anything of importance, and who didn't contribute anything to their music or their sound, and zero album songs.

You could remove everything they did with Best and you'll still have their discography intact, including all their seminal songs. Try doing that without the other four.

That's the very opposite of "arbitrary attachment"...

>I mean I get it

Nah, you clearly don't.
I was gonna say, kept going on about adopting protocols:

> So, these “alternative” companies need to adopt protocols instead of building their own private garden. Unity is the only way they can fight against a giant like Reddit.

Yet apparently hasn't even googled "Lemmy", "ActivityPub" or "Federation".
Username highly underrated
Wow daddy I'm impressed, use your strength on me.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_Unite...

It's this. America does not invest in its social problems.
Oh wow, nice! Big fan of his work
We are not using OpenSIL directly, but as a strong believer in the need for open source software at the lowest layers of the stack (i.e., silicon initialization and platform enablement), we are hugely supportive of this effort. Providers of silicon have embraced open source to varying degrees; AMD is showing that they understand the importance of open source (unlike several other vendors one might be able to name!) -- and we believe that customers will be the winners.