skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Personally, I find myself accepting that the first draft will always have its flaws. Even after all these years it can be hard for me to see these flaws until the first draft is done.

Once the first draft is finished, I can look back on what could be done better and I improve it. Sometimes it requires a rewrite, sometimes it doesn't.

If I was confident that the thing I'm building can be done with a no-code solution, I'll try it out. But often the things I'm building certainly won't have a good no-code solution.

Learn what's available, learn how others have built similar software, and then just try to build that thing!
I thought on this for a few days. The nature of scientific process, forces us to maintain absolute emphasis on our observation, to an extent which we are willfully ignoring the limitations and scope of our observations.

I wonder who is to blame, is this the current state of scientific studies? or they are actually considering these limitations in the papers, but it is ignored by public? then, is it the science communication to the public that's failing?

I feel shy even bringing up such topics among friends, because it is so far out of the common understanding that it will sound like flat-earth conspiracy to most.

People don't like to hear anything that goes like "we don't know some things at all". There is a comfort in knowing somewhere, some scientist are %100 accurate and know it all.
> I remember being downvoted for saying this is essentially a phone CPU and motherboard, just without consideration for constraints imposed by the phone's footprint.

That's not really the pejorative that you think it is.

Intel crushed the Unix workstations with volume - it was more economically efficient to make a workstation version of a desktop chip than to design one from scratch that wasn't supported by the desktop's volume.

Well, Apple is doing to Intel what Intel did to HP, Sun, IBM, DEC, and SGI: using their phone (and watch, etc.) volume to compete with Intel.

Perhaps Intel (and AMD) will stave them off. But if history is any guide, they'll be paddling upstream to do so.
Yes! That’s the other one I was thinking of. We literally sipped it like a whisky haha
> I don't care about motive

Pablo Escobar gave free money away. Would you take the money? He also built schools.

Motive matters. His intents were to build loyalty masked as charity. MrBeast is building (or has built) something else, masked as charity.

I hope MrBeast never stop giving away money and curing people, but there are some considerations to make here, and not just taking as granted the reasons the very same person doing charity is clearly trying to transmit.
> Newly discovered biomarker signatures point to a whole range of previously unknown organisms that dominated complex life on Earth about a billion years ago.
These interviews with developers in a magazine format is something I'd welcome seeing more. Who doesn't like a good war story?
Yea that's why I'm not even mad about it.

I think the route to go if the spam persists would be making it invite-only, and so that uninvited user registrations would have to be manually approved. Wouldn't eliminate the problem, but would potentially dramatically reduce the amount of moderation work vs. making it a free-for-all. Not getting enough usage now to justify it, but just an idea.

I think with the right people, the platform doesn't really matter at all. I mean the best communities now are probably in random Telegram group chats.

The main challenge is attracting a community of the right people in the first place, and that challenge is more marketing than technical. I think maybe the right approach here might just be creating and curating high quality content, then the people come. This is how most communities are built I think (eg. Indie Hackers). I'm admittedly more focused on other projects at the moment that I think have more obvious utility though (working on a self-hosted open source Notion clone at the moment)
Ah yes the FBI is now buying civilian data to take surveys for us! I envy your rose colored glasses.

Considering I know what kind of data is available, I sincerely doubt this is what is happening. Does that mean, that it's all super evil bad bad stuff, nah, but it is exploitable for evil for sure.
> Authorities are the ones who create the rules

The Securities Act of '33, Exchange Act of '34 and Howey Test were not created by the SEC.
Reminds me of the planets from the Trisololaris System.
(From the Three Body Problem by Cixin Liu)
This sounds like a great idea.

The best incremental view maintenance in an opensource DB might be this one:

- https://clickhouse.com/blog/using-materialized-views-in-clic...

It could be a good source for ideas. :) Great work on vlcn.io, btw! Looks really interesting, waiting for client views to start testing it in real apps.
Which reality do you live in? At least in the US, inflation is not “extremely” high and it’s been coming down for several months now. Interest rates are not “very high” by any historical measure and likewise are stalling and even coming down already. The labor market is ridiculously strong. The “several banks” that collapsed should have collapsed due to their own poor risk management [0] and the systemic risk was mitigated effectively and quickly.

Would be curious to hear what critical path you have in mind is likely enough to happen in one night so as to put the entire economy in a position of “teetering.”

[0] SVB’s risk model flashed red. So executives changed it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/04/02/svb-colla...
In my value system, killing people is the worst option of all, but defending bad meta comments is close second.
It's easy to say it's defined until your forced to define it to others.

If vertical integration is illegal, does that mean:
1) Farms can't sell directly to customers via their own store?
2) A restaurant or grocery store needs to use Uber or Door Dash to deliver?
3) A logistics company can't own any warehouses
4) A store can't own any distribution centers or logistic systems.
5) A website can't self-host, either on their own server or via a dedicated server. It must be hosted via SaaS.

I'm sure there's more examples that blur the line of vertical integration that can be hard to determine in a fair, just manner.
If I remember correctly it's not just that AMD has poor support for their consumer cards, their Rocm code doesn't compile to a device agnostic intermediate, so you have to recompile for each chip. New and old Cuda compatible cards (like all Geforce cards) can run your already shipped Cuda code, as long as it doesn't use new and unsupported features. So even if AMD had supported more cards, the development and user experience would be much worse anyway where you have to find out if your specific card is supported.
Merch revenue is revenue - Video sponsorship revenue is revenue - Product placement revenue ... revenue - Adsense revenue is well not much revenue.
Your back isn’t the issue with crazy creeks, the original supports lower back enough. Really issue is just getting in and out of them (at least for me, I’m pretty tall)
"The USA is the world's finance hub because it has the most reliable systems for trading financial assets"

Because there is regulation. You seem to get cause and effect mixed up.
What is the point of satisfying a designer? If they design a product for a customer, then the focus should be on satisfying the customer. If they design a product for themselves to use, OK fine, go ahead. But their expectations should not be pushed onto everyone else.

A website is not a playground to try out ones figma crayons making ever more complex figma designs. One of the lessons in about every design course or degree is, that the medium plays an important role. Web design should care about being design for websites. By not caring about the actual website and merely caring about ones figma design, one neglects the medium. The result is a bad design. Instead the design needs to carefully weigh what is easily possible with the medium, functionality, and look and feel.
> Since shipping, I see around 87% of customers (out of around 20,000+) are using the service for free and only about a small percentage ~12-13% are paying.

Congratulations on shipping!

Are new people mostly "free people" or do you continue to have a good mix of over 10% paid users? Is your free tier too generous? Is it too difficult to pay? As a "free people", I would love it if you priced your free tier in a sustainable way.
The LIDAR won't think the moon is a yellow traffic light.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UF-S2czdCk
I liked Programmer's Notepad but I don't think it had the same power as BBEdit.
My favourite thing to come out of the craft brew movement recently is the renewed interest in session beers and generally great beers a 4% or lower. I love being able to drink lots of really nice and interesting beers and just not feel drunk.
Apple Silicon CPUs have been "in a whole different league" for performance per watt when compared with other laptop or desktop CPUs for 2 reasons, they where made using a newer CMOS process to which competitors did not have yet access and they were designed to have a higher IPC, so that they have the same speed as competing CPUs at much lower clock frequencies, which results in a lower power consumption.

On the other hand the comparison between Apple Silicon CPUs and "server-grade CPUs" has always been much less favorable for Apple. The reason is that the higher IPC of Apple CPUs does not matter for server applications. The server CPUs use the same low clock frequency as the Apple CPUs, resulting in the same low power consumption. An Intel or AMD core is slower than an Apple core, but that is compensated by more cores, and more cores with lower IPC have a better performance per watt than fewer cores with higher IPC.

Therefore, until recently the Apple Silicon CPUs had a single advantage vs. "server-grade CPUs": they were made in various "5 nm" process variants, while the best "server-grade CPUs" were made in various "7 nm" process variants.

Since the end of last year, and especially after the launch of today of AMD Bergamo, the existing Apple Silicon CPUs do not have any advantage for server applications a.k.a. multithreaded applications.

Only after the launch of the next Apple Silicon CPUs, made in a "3 nm" process, they would become competitive again. However that does not matter anyway, because Apple has abandoned a long time ago the idea of competing in server applications and for now they are not interested in such applications.

Whenever the intention is to praise the good performance per watt of Apple Silicon CPUs, they should always be compared with laptop or desktop CPUs, never with "server-grade CPUs", because in the latter case the numbers are very different.
The laws pertinent to the SEC's complaint are the '33 Act, '34 Act and court cases which constructed the Howey Test. None of them were created by the SEC.
For the most part comfort and small size are going to be something you need to pick one of, except the crazy creek.

I’d recommend this for pure comfort but it’s large

https://www.yeti.com/outdoor-living/chairs/26010000016.html
If you can find it, I can’t recommend it enough. I bought a carton of it, twice, that’s how great it is (in my opinion). Don’t ask how much the carton was though haha
Those are great chairs! I’ve had mine for a year and left it out in the sun, rain and snow and it has literally no sign of wear. And it is very comfortable! And expensive!
I think you are looking at it from a technical point of view, and not a "product" point of view.

Adding a tag to something doesn't communicate that you are posting it in a community, nor does it communicate that community's rules, etiquette, morals and values. When a user "tags" something it just means adding a label to it. "Posting" in a community communicates something very different.
Totally feel ya there. If I had a different sorta history, I would have like to have started with something like d3 or even Unity… alas, poor me, heh. I’d love to chat! My email’s fairly public, so feel free to ping me at thelugos @pm.me (no space).
Thank you for the post. Glad the docs were able to help with a couple of the issues you encountered (I work at Neon). Please reach out to us if you encounter anything that is not addressed.
Oh wow he’s taking care of a gray parrot, how sweet. The guys are incredibly smart btw
The US IRS also has this; a “Private Letter Ruling”. https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/understanding-irs-guidance-a-br...
What if that information was how you voted, or that stupid thing you posted on AITA six beers deep five years ago, or how much time you spend watching Netflix, maybe you watch too many war movies, maybe one time you posted anti advertising agency content six years ago and you applied to an ad agency because you desperately needed a job.

In highly competitive markets people use stupid things to deny people opportunities.
Slack will no longer be translated into Russian
No, they don't.
Aria roles are not for making one tag to work like another. (Otherwise what is the point of having different tags with different semantics?).

Aria is for making inaccessible html more accessible.
Links can not be disabled (buttons can) - so they dont rely on js to work;
Buttons rely on js (except for submitting the form).
There is no way to interchange one with another without sacrificing usability.
You don’t reckon it’s just disgruntled users running “set all my past comments to Boo Reddit Boo” scripts? I don’t imagine it’d take a huge proportion of users doing that simultaneously to slag the servers.
Youtube itself is a monopoly, alternative frontends is the absolute minimum we can do as anti-trust legislation isn't applied
What is exactly the use case for hot-swapping CPUs?
In Elisp, there's no other way, because you cannot create private symbols, everything is public and global. What's even worse is that in the case of name clash, the named entity (variable, function, macro) gets silently replaced with the new definition. So, without a convention of, roughly:

package-name--private-function
package-name-public-function
package-name-class-name-_field_name

You're playing with fire. But that's an extreme edge case.

For other cases, I agree completely. Indeed, the only meaningful consideration when talking about readability is the mechanics of eye movement. You can get used to reading almost anything, but you can't change how your eye works. Line length limits are important also because of this, not only because of better diffs.

I also dislike spamming newlines everywhere, as if the line length limit was 20 chars. The newline suggests, to me at least, that something was done and we're moving on. It's a weak signal, but convenient. Now, when you split every single object.call1().call2().callN() into multiple lines, it's actually harder to see the whole thing (you can't see much more than a few lines at the same time) and it makes that signal disappear in the noise.

In any case - all talk about "readability" should start, and more importantly stop, at physical and mechanical limitations of human vision. Everything else is just familiarity with a particular notation or style.
> No one is allowed to deal in unregistered securities

All of VC happens with unregistered securities.
"Rental revenue is shared with the management company, and owners typically pay no upfront fees for management, which includes the marketing and reservation of the units.[citation needed] Typical monthly fees for units in the rental pool include FF&E (Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment) reserve and resort fee(s). Although the revenue splits between owner and management company do vary from project to project, most hover around 50 percent."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condo_hotel
I think the statement that LLMs don't understand the rules of maths is far too strong. And this notion that LLMs are not able to answer a random arithmetic question "correctly" only holds if you assume "correctness" exists as binary and not a scalar.

I'd propose that your claim that LLMs don't understand at maths is very similar to the claim that Neuton didn't understand the Laws of Motion.

Yes – Neuton's laws are wrong, but they're also practically correct for 99.999% of applications. If correctness is viewed as a binary, Neuron is 100% wrong, but as a scalar Neuron is basically right.

Neural networks are inherently bad at finding exact rules, but they're excellent at approximating them to an accuracy that is acceptably good, this is bit that people miss when they say LLMs can't do maths.

When you claim they don't understand the rules of maths, I agree that they don't understand the explicit rules, but with the caveat that they probably understand something that allows them to approximate those rules "well enough".

This is why if you ask ChatGPT a question like 23435234 + 3243423 it's not going to say -33.1. It might not give the right answer, but it will almost always give you something that's close and very plausible. So while it might not understand the exact rules, it basically understands what happens when you add two numbers and 99% of the time will give you an answer that is basically correct.

The larger point I was trying to make here is that I think we humans are kinda biased when it comes to maths because we understand character precision which is the bias I think you're basing your reasoning on here. We humans believe precision is extremely important in the context of maths unlike other textual content. But an LLM isn't operating with that bias. It's just trying to approximate maths in a way that is correct enough in a similar way that it's trying to approximate the likely next character (or more correctly token) of other text content.

I don't think approximations are 100% wrong and perhaps us humans being bothered about LLMs giving answers to maths questions that are 0.1% wrong actually says more about our values and how we view maths than it says about an LLMs mathematical abilities.
Mostly gets really clunky for recursive functions.
yes that is what the trend I posted shows.
> Under the Fourth Amendment

Is the EFF aware that 95.75% of the population of the planet does not live under the Amendments of the Constitution of the USA?

Are Geofence Warrants and Reverse Keyword Warrants Invasive? Yes. Is the reason because in 1789 someone in the US didnt like something. No.
Scraping is legal.

https://techcrunch.com/2022/04/18/web-scraping-legal-court/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharysmith/2022/04/18/scrapin...
Good god, I wish I had this luxury. I feel like I'm always seeking stability and dodging explosives.
The duck in the room – the end of baseload
I think you misunderstand GP's post on a low level, words-and-their-definitions level. The story has a timeline to it, and during the hometown portion they were not wealthy and not discussing wealth yet. Read it more carefully.
Yeah, I find it weird how LLMs make a lot of the kind of mistakes that people do, but somehow this is held up as being a reason why LLMs don’t work similarly to brains.

Since discovering LLMs I’ve become convinced that my brain works like them. I really don’t know the next word I’m going to say until it’s nearly out. And since learning about how LLMs work, I really can’t argue it away.

It’s a reasonably disturbing feeling.
Ok… so that doesn’t answer my question. It seems like the LIDAR based systems would be just as apt to make different kinds of mistakes.
There is no API call that returns a direct link to the video file. To get it, you have to defeat encryption measures, and that is illegal under the DMCA.
I suppose it depends how regular the signal is otherwise. If a dip happens super-regularly (which I guess it would with single star planet orbits), it might be small relative to pointwise noise of the detector, but large enough to be detected over time (if you have the observations).

Your point on period length stands. And anyway I'm just waxing lyrical, I'm a statistician and amateur stargazer not a pro :)
Egalitarian in the sense that nobody is untouchable and everybody gets shit from everyone else. Rights and opportunities are built into the system by anonymity, minimal moderation and the resulting lack of power structure. Others are kept out by self-selection.
> The use case isn’t that clear to me. Perhaps a photographer, for a phone with a couple of TB of SSD.

IMO, eventually, phones will replace low end desktop/laptop computers.

Someone (probably Apple, since their CPUs are head and shoulders above the competition) will have to do the work of designing a mode switching UI, but once that's done, they'll really be able to cut into desktop volume.

I'm sure the early devices will be... awkward to use - mostly limited to the browser[1].

But after a few iterations, I'm sure it'll mature into something that can stand on its own.

No idea when it'll happen, but I do think that economics will push it into being sooner or later.

---

1. Presumably people would also be able to use other phone apps, but a lot of those look weird when scaled up. And transiting from touch to mouse/trackpad is not straightforward.
closes thread
Look at it more as a way to offset your subscription cost, not a possible side income. If you're a contributing member you get a content service for near free, with much better quality/spam control than something like Reddit.
The constitution was written a long time ago and really says nothing about information technology for obvious reasons. The fact that we don't have amendments for a lot of modern issues is a scary thing for the general population.
Congrats on the launch! Still early in my process but I found this YC Startup School video useful relative to your question. [0]:https://youtu.be/oWZbWzAyHAE
I read this as a positive. Practicing what you preach. Rich asked for a further introduction into the needs behind the users request. The user decided not to pursue that further. Perhaps the feature could have been re-introduced if the client had a very clear user story. We won't know. Is it fair to ask users for stories when you introduce UI/UX regressions. That's debatable. But Rick showed real interest consistent with expectations.
On the same topic a panel discussion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zbzwu7AExZM

"Finland’s Electricity Prices Fall Below Zero"
4chan and others approach to internet discourse is very approachable for most eastern european millennials. It just works well with their distain for faux/internet personalities, which is something you will end up with when anonymity is not a strong element of a community.

But I have no data on visitors or posters, so I might be projecting.
In that case, just retract _any_ part of the key, such that it won’t work if you copy paste it, but still no used secret is revealed.

If a user wants to rebuild the key in order to use it for something, then they must have a very good reason to do so, and it is probably better to just let them do that.
it convinced me, i am going to stop styling the scrollbar in my projects unless the designer throws a tantrum (and i cannot convince them not to)
No, GPU is even close to saturate 16 lanes.
If available and interested, follow local courses like gardening or woodworking, and take initiative to meet up afterwards and share progress on the activity with them.
I agree. Originally I'd been planning to have upvotes be redeemable as tokens, but quickly scrapped that idea for the same reason.

I'm thinking now the best way a site like Reddit can satisfy people like me disappointed with the quality is to improve their ML algorithms to better serve content suited to users. I'm not talking about anything revolutionary here, can just do some basic clustering and add an "insightful" option. I'm admittedly not a ML person so not claiming any expertise here. I hope someone more well-versed in that area can create a Reddit clone or Chrome extension or something that has these better more accurate comment sort by algorithms, I'd sign up.
I agree. The name sounds like a toolbox.
> save for those video workloads they're missing fixed function hardware

You do know that the Mac Pro is targeted specifically at those workloads.