skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't think most people understand just how fine the precision happens to be. All that hard work just so people can laugh at memes as quickly as possible.
Not quite sure I follow. Do you mean your frontend sends a "send message X to user Y" request to your backend, which then enqueues it internally and handles the actual SMTP later?

That part of the logic wouldn't be in the browser (unless you're purposefully trying to emulate SMTP on the client for some reason). In Resend, for example, a 200 just acknowledges that their API successfully received your request and will attempt delivery soon. It doesn't necessarily mean the email was either sent from their SMTP servers or received by the recipient's server client. You can check delivery status later on in the dashboard: https://resend.com/docs/dashboard/emails/introduction#unders...

(And then optionally receive that as a webhook later on, if you want to notify the user of success: https://resend.com/docs/dashboard/webhooks/event-types#email...)

----

Edit: In case it wasn't clear, the value of something like Resend or (SES or SendGrid or whatever) is that you don't HAVE to write logic to handle the tricky parts of email delivery. You just send an API call to someone else's transactional email service and let them worry about all that.

Bigger companies with dedicated staff/teams might want to inhouse a lot of that stuff, but there are a lot of smaller companies (or non tech companies) that still need to do transactional emails but don't necessarily want to maintain it in-house.

In a resource-constrained team/org, it's the difference between a full-stack dev who has to split time between making the website and maintaining the backend(s) and infra, vs a cheaper frontend Javascript dev who can focus solely on the frontend UX/marketing/branding/etc.. The latter can matter more for direct-to-consumer companies who don't necessarily care about the backend as long as it works and isn't too expensive... those 3rd party services are usually much cheaper than hiring even a junior dev/sysadmin.
Artificial Intelligence gets its first law
This is a shame - I have one of their combo air-fryers/pressure-cookers and although it is only a passable air-fryer, it is the best pressure cooker I have ever used and very good value for the relatively cheap price.
Yep. I've given up on any C or C++ projects because I find they almost never work and waste hours of my time. Part of the issue might be the fact that I'm often using Windows or MacOS but I've had bad experiences on Linux also.
40 Half-hour videos featuring Apple engineers on various aspects of Vision Pro
I got one to replace all three of those, and it works great.
Many good people use coke recreationally. Not sure why you jump to the conclusion that they are shitty
I completely get it on some level - I feel exactly the same way as the market does, but I can’t really put my finger on “why”.
What I was saying is that because you need to go out of your way to make sure it's tokenized properly, I wouldn't be surprised if there are enough non properly tokenized examples in the dataset.

If that was the case, it would make it difficult to generalize these concepts.
I've been there a few times in the past few years, and while there are plenty of nice spots in the city, the parts that _aren't_ nice are hell on earth. I've been in lots of dangerous cities but SF is on another level with the amount of drug use and mental illness. It seems to be more common on west coast cities because I've seen similar things in Portland, Seattle, and even Vancouver.
Or they think the UK citizens won't throw the regulators and their bosses out of a job. I doubt many citizens in the UK feel strongly enough about the merger to want access to neither if they merge. People don't particularly like when you take their toys away.
> Also, as a counterexample, society whatever it may be cares about motherhood, that doesn’t mean it pays money to mothers…

On the contrary, it's an example, not a counterexample. The fact that the US, almost alone in the world, doesn't have mandatory paid parental leave, absolutely says something about how much the American society cares about parenthood. Of course, you don't have to pay people to make future taxpayers if they're doing it for free – and indeed spending a lot of money raising said future taxpayers, so on an individual level Americans certainly seem to care about children.

Of course there are also other ways than money to manipulate people into having more kids, such as poor sex education and making it socially frowned upon or even illegal to use contraception or have an abortion. In any case, having children is obviously an extreme edge case given that there's a couple billion years worth of genetic programming making us want to have them, or at the very least making us want to partake in the activity that's supposed to result in children.

The article can be aptly summarized as: "Talk is cheap, show me the money". An individual or a society can virtue signal however much they like, but to find out what they really care about, take a look at where the money is going.
This is the definition of ad hominem.

I am in my mid-30s and highly resistant to change; the article resonates. I'm not ready to leave my job (I have two more years of RSUs to collect), but I am moving houses within my city solely for the change of scenery and pattern. I expect in the next few years, unless I meet someone life-changing, that I will leave my city or even take a multi-year sabbatical until I feel the urge or need to go back to my profession.

Notable quotes:

>But for the relatively sane, by the time you’re mostly ready to leave a job, or a city, or a relationship, you probably have good reason to.

>At any given time, your motion is being constrained by an agglomeration of previous decisions made by a previous you, decisions that might have little to do with your current wants.

I think these are good points to consider if one is the kind of person who accumulates "stuff" or has existential anxiety.
GPS is not a substitute to looking around and matching the reality to what you see on your screen, obviously :)
yeah, so in other words, might makes right in the world that the US has configured.
The reason it's a puzzle is because most people, usually including the lawyer themself, assumes soup kitchen volunteers are volunteering for the purpose of helping others.

If the primary purpose of the hour volunteering is not to bring maximum good to others but instead to enjoy the hour or socialize, then the hour may be spent efficiently for the lawyer, but it is not pursuing the primary purpose of "caring for others' good."

Any (functional) utility calculation does take into account internal state & knowledge gained. Pretty much by definition, utilons are internal-only. The lawyer's enjoyment of the hour is factored in; however, if the point of the hour is to maximize total utility across all humans, the lawyer would be better to spend an extra hour at work (unless soup kitchen work provides a large enough multiplier to mental health, or they wouldn't be motivated to do lawyer work without the hour at the soup kitchen). Even in cases where soup kitchen work is better in the long-haul, those hours in the soup kitchen are spent buying fuzzies, not utilons directly.

This only works from a utilitarian perspective. If the lawyer getting maximal enjoyment from their good is more important than the amount of good produced, then soup kitchening will ~always be more effective, but you're no longer engaging with the core philosophy of the essay.
Not that this means your response is wrong (I largely agree) but funny enough in my household our insta-pot is essentially just a rice cooker. We basically use it for nothing else, but it’s also really good for rice! Fluffy and perfect everytime.
To be clear, I'm not saying freedom of speech is a bad thing. On the contrary, I agree protecting speech is a great way to ensure the free exchange of ideas. (As you noted, if you can't speak your ideas then you can't freely exchange them.)

But there's a lot of "speech" that should be and is already prohibited, both legally (CP being an obvious example), or through social standards of conduct (screaming expletives at random passers by is liable to get you kicked out of just about any venue).

In my view, focusing on the goal of freedom of speech (which is to say, the free exchange of ideas) rather than on speech itself communicates much more clearly on why the principle is important and where the line is. It makes it obvious why CP is not legally protected but Nazism is. Both are despicable, but one needs to be protected in order to preserve the free exchange of ideas while the other doesn't.

And again, I'm not saying other forms of expression that don't convey ideas shouldn't be allowed; just that the reasons why they should or shouldn't be allowed are separate from the reasons why the free exchange of ideas is important.

Yes, this wording does narrow my argument somewhat. But I think it largely narrows it in ways that make it easier to defend rhetorically, especially when trying to apply the principle to non-government entities such as the large social media conglomerates that own our modern town square.
Hmmm, I see that Stacks has 2 seed rounds, a series A, and a VC round all separately listed prior to the token fundraising. Good to see you were able to be partly successful at traditional raising, at least enough to afford the lawyers and the filing fees, before you had to raise from tokens. Not every one has those opportunities or connections.
I don’t think so, there are no barriers to entry for colas. People just aren’t interested in more options.
Also the meeting of Diogenes with Alexander the Great.
The cool, indie stores were the first to go. They can't afford to be so accommodating to theft. The big box stores and the chains were able to cross-subsidize with the profits from the burbs. But now even they can't afford the chaos.
I’ve written a chip 8 emulator in both C and Rust and the Rust one is definitely more clear, and with destructured pattern matching you can really cleanly decode the opcodes in Rust: https://github.com/plan-x64/chip8/blob/master/chip8-core/src...

Normally I’d do something like a simple prefix lookup table with function pointers in C for this but chip8 opcodes require parsing the postfix to fully determine the operation (I.e. 8xy[0..e], where x and y are registers) which requires further parsing than a simple lookup table based on prefix.
How are malls against urban planning? Seems like kind of the opposite no? All the stores you need to visit in one place. As long as they're close to where you live, seems like a win win to me.
For example: simply take a valid identity's public key, and use it as the secret to forge a token with alg=hs256. A service receiving this token will use its copy of the public key (by key id) to verify the signature, but because it's being told that it's an HMAC-signed token, will construct an HMAC.

Of course this HMAC will verify correctly because both you (the attacker) and the server hold the same public key used. And now the server thinks its a legitimate JWT because the signature is valid.

Mixing symmetric and asymmetric cryptography types in the same message scheme is just one of the many ways in which JWT is a bad idea.
Sounds project-y.
Leveraging the power of Lua scripting with Dragonfly
JRuby. TruffleRuby.
When it gets really fun is when Trailforks is wrong...

I'm trying to get that fixed with a State Rec Area in northern Michigan. Trailforks was drawn, years ago, with the old/unofficial/local names of a bunch of bandit trails. Since then the state has closed a couple trails, officially recognized others, names have become standardized, and an official map has been developed.

Now Trailforks doesn't match the official map nor the on-the-ground signage. But the level of change needed is beyond what a normal user can do, and I'm struggling to get an admin to make the changes. In the mean time, when I was there a couple weeks ago I helped three separate groups that were profoundly lost because they thought they were in one place (per Trailforks) but none of the signage matched what they thought. It was the whole bad-data-is-worse-than-no-data problem.

If you want to see this for yourself, compare these two:

https://www.trailforks.com/region/harlow-lake/

https://www2.dnr.state.mi.us/publications/pdfs/RecreationCam...
Corelle still uses the same really excellent formula they've always used, though. I have a mixed set of new and old Corelle dishes (<1 yr old and >10 years old), and I can't tell the new ones from the old ones.
But at this point it should be (maybe not OpenAI but some other organization). OpenAI is close to becoming a necessity and a human right just like education so it should be 100% free and accessible at some point.

EDIT: I meant AI, not specifically OpenAI.
Not everyone chose to get vaccinated.
Anchor Steam, Anchor porter, and Anchor liberty are longtime favorites.

I think that the porter is a real standout, and have based some of my home brewing on trying to simulate its flavor.

There's a lot of stouts out there but not many porters.

The prevailing trend seems to be hop-bomb this and abv max out that. I'm usually not looking for an extreme sport in my mouth.
More likely the execs know they can take their piece and then bounce when the check comes due. There's no downside, they can just move on to the next victim and repeat until they have enough money to retire.
Given the early logo for the language was Joe Camel, it would need a smoking room ...
Link to the report mentioned in the article.

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/...
Because everyone has one...you have explained it yourself.

Every consumer brand that expands quickly will keep expanding to the point that they saturate their market (GoPro, Doc Martens was a recent IPO in the UK that has self-destructed, it happens over and over). What is unusual about this case is that, afaik, they didn't IPO. Usually the IPO is the prelude to saturation and then bankruptcy because the incentives get totally skewed (and because companies will usually fiddle with supply before the IPO to boost the sale price).
> what this means for the “I am 100% sure GameStop will make me a billionaire” cult

Was wondering this myself. Does this headline mean that this thing has been pumped and dumped and they're back to managing decline? Have unfolding events made the logic behind the bullish argument bad? Something else?
That’s a huge percentage of GDP? Why are you writing it off as “only.”
> without literally going through everyone's private communications?

Most shooters had mental issues that went ignored or were swept under the rug by the adults that were supposed to help.

> Only like 0.1% of them will ever shoot up a school

This is still at least two orders of magnitude larger than the real number. It's what the people who wants to take legally-owned firearms away want to the public to think.
A syntax-producing machine harnessing the power of duality will still never have access to semantic content. For this reason I have difficulty saying that it understands things beyond a colloquial sense.
>As unpleasant as it may be to admit, we are each individually to blame for this slump-inducing cycle’s persistence, and we are each responsible for halting it.

To some degree we are to blame, however this doesn't take into account the fact that there are armies of psychologists, marketers and developers and billions of dollars' worth of equipment at the other end of your feed. They aim specifically to get you to stay in the Skinner box so it's not exactly fair to say it's on us.
Does anyone have a specific recommendation for a glass measuring cup that is safe to boil on a gas stove (like PYREX before they changed their glass)?
I remember Doom Eternal doing that to me and being pretty unhappy about it.
Everyone who wants one already has one, and it's not the kind of thing you need to upgrade every year. I'll keep using my Instant Pot for the next 10 years, but that won't help Instant Brands make money.
> I really hope it’s not ignorance instead of indifference.

It's a special kind of weird to worry about whether the people who are interested in a SBC you're not interested in are "ignorant."

> If the price is going up

It's not, so you can stop worrying about that.
They were referring to Pyrex when talking about "shoddy replacements", not Instant Pot (although they didn't specify this in their comment, so confusion is very understandable).
The UK blocking the merger doesn’t necessarily stop it. It could be overturned on appeal or the deal could be modified to suit the UK’s concerns.

It’s also theoretically possible that the deal goes through despite the CMA not approving it. I’m not a lawyer and I don’t know if that looks like Microsoft no longer selling games and gaming in the UK (possible) or no longer doing business in the UK entirely (not likely).

Besides, the US filed suit back in 2022.
Congrats on the launch! What’s your stance on GDPR and SOC2? I’m making a B2B SaaS and we need to vet our vendors, would be helpful to know. Thanks!
Fascinating. It used to be that religious mores defined the sacred, what may and what may not be done. But seems to me that biological ethics are the litmus test in our day for what is sacred. They are the center point in the tug-of-war between what can be technologically done and what the culture deems acceptable. Case in point is the guidelines referenced in the article, published by International Society for Stem Cell Research.
It's in terrible shape, and the spotlight is larger due to political reasons as a topic of right wing propaganda. This of course causes the left + politicians to knee jerk deny the issues, and pretend everything is going great to defend the message at the national level which who cares?
It wasn't particularly deep thinking though. The same is also true here.
Socioeconomically and culturally more specific than people tend to acknowledge.
Not just any old writer, but Eliezer himself, the less wrongest of less wrongers.

I can see why he wrote this. He founded the Singularity Institute for AI, which eventually became the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI), which ultimately provides him with his sinecure. Despite producing no research of any value, MIRI has been funded with "units of caring" by people like Peter Thiel, Vitalik Buterin and Dustin Moskovitz. Now Eliezer has transformed fully into a modern Cassandra, prophesying imminent AI apocalypse from which there is no escape. Sadly, for him, there are not enough units of caring to save us.
Aye, and this drives me nuts. For 50+ years, "Pyrex" was the name of a material, borosilicate glass, with known material properties. You could count on it being safe in certain situations.

Then Corning somehow decided that it was the name of a _brand_, and they could use whatever inferior material they wanted, and if you put it in those same situations it would explode and cover your kitchen/lab in glass shards.

How that was even legal, I will never understand.
You can always use a tunneling service such as https://pinggy.io or zrok for self hosted or ngrok.
"OpenAI is close to becoming a necessity and a human right" is the wildest claim I have heard yet about AI. (Though it's possible that maybe someday I will agree with this).
>I winced a little on that part too, but he does give the caveat later that women and children weren't equal to men at all, which means that "egalitarian societies" means "something like 30% of the tribe was somewhat egalitarian" which really isn't saying much

That's also what ancient Athenian democracy was
Sam Altman interviews Elon Musk (2016)[video]
When I first saw this, I thought it looked silly and too simple to be useful.

The other day I looked at my DEVONthink database I’ve populated over the last 15 years or so, and what do ya know. It has a couple dozen top-level folders, each with a handful of folders inside, and that’s about it. I didn’t deliberately set out to do this, but “Banking/{Bank1|Bank2|Bank3}”, “Medical/{Me,wife,kid}”, “Taxes/{2020,2021,2022}”, and so on evolved that way anyway.

I love the idea of tagging, but turns out nearly all the information I care to store long-term can be filed more easily than it can be tagged. It’s rare that I want to have the same doc in 2 places, mainly limited to when I’m collecting information to send to someone else (e.g. filing taxes, applying for a business loan). When that happens, I just - shocker! - make copies of those docs in a new folder I’ve created to collect everything I need. DEVONthink makes the copy a zero-sized reference to the original doc and gives each copy a special icon so you know it’s a duplicate.

So basically, Johnny Decimal couldn’t possibly work for me, and yet I ended up with a sad version of the exact same thing on my own naturally. Well, huh. Maybe it’s not so silly after all.

(Also, regarding tagging: the idea of a database with a few tens of thousands of files in the same namespace, searchable by tagging, gives me hives. I know people do this all the time, and it’s a “me problem” that it bothers me, but oh, how it bothers me.)
Forums are dead, long live forums
Back before social media, we had discussion forums. No shit. One of my faves was XKCD's (RIP). In searching for Giant Robot's forums (another old fave), I discovered Giant in the Playground. It looks quite buzzin. The topics are pretty narrow, but looks like a good time.

Stats:
Threads 591,660
Posts 20,498,802
Members 186,384
I'm not certain. Are you willing to spend a week of your life testing every different screen reader to make sure your site doesn't break one?
>Maps are like script handwriting. Obsolete in practice and it's a shame.

Hmm. Not a good analogy. Script handwriting adds no new information. A 1 meter square backcountry topo map provides way more info than looking at a handheld screen. I can see big picture terrain as well as high resolution of my immediate surroundings. Completely different sense of surroundings and the information is simultaneously clear in overall layout, dense, and abundant.

It is decidedly not obsolete. I would never take an extended backcountry trip without a detailed waterproof topo map and a compass. Stuff happens. Batteries fail, screens shatter, etc...

However, you don't have to go into the backcountry to benefit from a printed map. A city map will immediately impart a much better sense of spatial relations between different points and a more immediately intuitive understanding of the routing between the points.
If you're just mirroring Youtube's content and not somehow plugging into their Youtube Premium nor advertisement stack, I don't see how that's very defensible nor comparable to a cache.

https://w4.cuevana3.ai "Oh look, it's totally just a cache of movies. What, you think caching should be illegal now?"

Kind of dishonest reasoning tbh because it's not the impl detail (cache or not) that anyone cares about, it's whether you're ripping content. Are you the Youtube creator or not?
> CDKTF is totally optional and besides the point.

Eh? Then Terraform is optional too? You can do the reverse and say HCL is optional. Who decides? You're thinking from a Terraform 1st perspective.

> Could as well say you can use Pulumi with Makefiles so the Pulumi choice doesn’t make it simpler.

Except Pulumi doesn't support makefiles? It does support yaml.

So yaml is a simpler DSL that people know than HSL, so it still wins by your logic? Makes no sense. UI is simpler to learn than Terraform. Might as well do ClickOps?

> “there are multiple dev teams who all use different languages” as stated

And so you can't pick a language that is used more often? It doesn't have to be Typescript. So if >30% of the devs use 1 language it already has that advantage over HCL.