skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The screenshot of the WhatsApp conversation says they'd need admin on the web application. I agree it wasn't clear if they'd gotten that.

Looks like it was via the backup files:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36305699
The reason all the factories left the US is because of unfair Chinese currency manipulations. The Chinese have pegged the Yuan to the dollar at a rate of 6 to 1. Since the dollar defines unit labor costs, what pegging the Yuan means is a CEO gets 6 Chinese workers for every 1 American worker. It's really like 4 to 1 when you take into account shipping costs for Ocean and Air freight. Other countries do not enjoy most favored currency status. In other countries, the value of the dollar would change if we had a huge trade imbalance which would eventually equalize. But not with China. But pegging the Yuan is only half the problem. The bigger problem is artificial intelligence and automation. With automation, every job becomes menial and corporations can pay less wages. And eventually, corporations will have total automation where workers are no longer needed. But workers are also consumers. And without consumers having money, our economy will collapse. So every year as we move closer to total automation the workers are begin driven closer into poverty. At some point, to prevent total economic collapse, there needs to be a new source of income for consumers. Consumers need to become the new workers doing the hard work of consuming. Consumers need to be paid for consuming is the only answer for ensuring enough economic velocity so everyone has enough money to get their needs met.
Ideally that's up to the community. The ideal counter-reaction of this is "Well I'll make my own sub, and attract people tired of memes". In this model, there will hopefully be a sizeable subscriber community, so you don't need to appeal to the masses if the ones willing to put their money where they mouths make the move.

But if not, and if memes are what subscribers want to use all their votes on, well... the experiment fails in my eyes (even if it may be a success as a business).

That's also why I feel we need at least two tiers of votes, personally. There will be times where you want to vote on a cheap but funny meme but you don't exactly want to say "yes, this is the content I pay for". A version of vote that says "I don't mind it but obviously you shouldn't make money on this" may help curb that as more of the super votes go to actual quality content. But nothing is bullet proof when you let the people decide.
Attention is money. How you skin it doesn't matter. Your attention is what's for sale, and bought.
WebGPU strikes me as the answer to that. Perhaps I am missing something?
HIre writers and or friends and create tons of posts with tons of comments ... true or not. Though nowadays you could get something like Chat GPT to create all the fake posts and comments until you marketed where a few users come and interact with the AI content then a few more and more and more and then less AI fake crap and more authenticity.

Im pretty sure this is how Reddit and many popular sites started. Fake it before you make it! Without interesting content you DOA.
I'm blown away that this is being upvoted. The lack of effort and critical thought here is appalling.
So, not only this promotes itself to be a copy of Reddit, but also trashes the CEO in the name of the clone. Now don't get me wrong, I support the protest and an alternative to reddit. However, the way this is framed sounds like a one way street to a losing lawsuit. At least a very expensive one.
Most people don’t move that far from where they grow up. City populations have more to do with a select few choosing where they want to live and either having lots of babies, or convincing other people to come to them. Once the city is established, most of its population growth is self-sustaining.
Documentation can play a significant role in reducing support tickets by providing users with the necessary information and guidance to resolve common issues on their own.

To identify the hot topics on support tickets, the docs team can liaise with the customer support team to get the support tickets data and figure out the content strategy. The docs team can add sections like FAQ, troubleshooting, customization, and best practices to address the queries. This can yield in reducing future support tickets.

You also need help from the support team on this task. When a customer raises a query that is already present in the docs, they should share the response along with the respective docs page link. This action would help the customers identify that the docs page is up-to-date and their queries can be resolved through self-service rather than a support ticket.
Reading comprehension is certainly irrelevant if one is interested only in their tunnel-visioned thesis.

At no point the impromptu syllabus from above defends anyone or anything. In fact, it is so tame it didn't even mention more problematic, although arguably important and interesting, works such as Martin Heidegger's [1]. To think referencing someone as Günther Anders defends fascism is just too ludicrously functionally illiterate for any other words to be further possible.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Question_Concerning_Techno...
Python was released in 1991. It obviously didn’t get package management right, just like C and C++ didn’t figure it out in the 70s.

Take a look at rust’s Cargo for what a modern package manager should look like. Or deno / Go if you swing that way.

Which old language gets package management right? None of them. None of them get it right.

And sure - conda / venv / CMake / etc help. But last century’s bad design decisions still shine through.
Somebody is way ahead of you with the idea of a non-profit Reddit

https://flingup.com/
I recently hit the "classic" case. Saw a CLI tool for an API I'd like to use, written in Python. Tried it and found out it didn't work on my machine. I later found out it was a bug in a dependency of that tool. 100 lines of shell script later, I had the functionality I needed, and a codebase which was actually free of unexpected surprises. I know, this is an extreme example, but as personal anecotes go, Python has lost a lot of trust from my side. I also wonder how people can write >10k codebases without static types, but that is just me ....
> So far, all these alternatives I'm reading about can't convincingly explain how they plan to pay for themselves.

For most of its existence, Reddit hasn't been able to convincingly explain how it can pay for itself, and it still can't. The company currently isn't and I don't think has ever been profitable.
Carbon credits are an important way to pay for things there's no other way to pay for. I work with Recoolit to prevent refrigerant emissions (more at https://www.recoolit.com/our-work) and there's literally no other way to pay for our work, which can prevent gigatons of CO2e
used material for mkdocs - https://github.com/squidfunk/mkdocs-material . Its pretty neat.
It's not quite the same, in that at least the false numbers come from elsewhere in the document being scanned. Samsung is pulling data from elsewhere on the internet to "correct" images.
Would you extend that to buttons, text fields and all other components in general?

I'd say default should be whatever the web designer wanted, if you're not agree you can always use one of the overrider plugins.
"Coinbase lists less than 300"

With only BTC Coinbase would not be an exchange but a wallet.
They are. Once purchased, they're retired and not sold again
Hacker News Guidelines

What to Submit
On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.

Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.
Where will they go? When people left Digg, Reddit was there. As of right now, there's no viable Reddit competitor.
> By definition, you can either make housing affordable to young people entering the market, or make housing a path to wealth appreciation for homeowners

By whose definition? Certainly the massive suburban expansion in the 60's and 70's resulted in affordable homes to young Baby Boomers entering the market and also to wealth appreciation for the same.
Sure there was, everyone was talking about perl6 migration back in 2000's. The "unfortunately named language" appeared once it became clear once migration failed.

Here is one of the earliest announcements: https://www.perl.com/pub/2000/07/perl6.html/ .. some quotes:

> So the upward migration path from Perl 5 to Perl 6 will probably be to run your code through a translator.

> Larry promised not to abandon Perl 5. The 5.6 maintenance track will continue as planned, and the 5.7 development track will eventually yield Perl 5.8, as planned. 5.8 will be the final release of Perl 5, but it will continue to be maintained and stable.

perl is at 5.37 now... so much for "5.8 will be the final release" :) Also, this does sounds awfully like Python 2->3 migration.
> If unselfish means that I can't benefit in addition to you benefiting

One doesn't preclude the other. But if my benefit is a pre-requisite for the benefit of others, it changes the dynamic.

Would Mr. Beast continue these acts if he weren't also turning it into content? I'm sure everyone has an opinion, but I'm not particularly convinced.

I suppose what makes it hard to be skeptical here is there is real "good" being applied here, but the motivations behind them are important, too.
On the other hand, moving cities/countries/continents for a salary boost can compound over your career and be probably the best financial decision you'll ever make.

I think it all comes down to what you want in life. Some people are happy with making their nest early and switching to cruise control. Others want to get out and experience as much of the world as they can. It's trite, but different strokes and all that.
"Do you think he could actually get a law changed and help more people than he already did?"

The most popular YT video creator could probably start a fairly large lobbying effort although yes, the multi-trillion dollar US for-profit health insurance industry could probably do better.

"Why wouldn't a "Mr Beast goes to Washington" style video get as many views as his direct support videos got?"

It might, there's only one way to know.
Well maybe they should? At least big ones.

They don't need to make "merit-based judgements" to do the same security analysis they'd do after the IPO.
Damn, their Porter is legend and Old Foghorn is a Barlywine staple.

That said in Texas we have 512 Brewing Pecan Porter and Real Ale Sisyphus.
Unregistered securities offerings are also illegal.
I don’t fundamentally disagree with you, but I think people’s conception of curing cancers is just out of touch with reality. Cancer is a group of diseases, and we have come a very long way in successfully treating many members of that - there are many many millions who would have gotten a death sentence just a decade ago, being completely cured nowadays.

I don’t know about these foundations, maybe it is mostly funded by governments/EU funds, whatever instead, but there is good research out there.
I'm not exactly a fan of Mr. Beast, but this comment reeks of more elitism than any Mr. Beast video I've ever watched. Are "poors" too stupid to make decisions for themselves? Everyone in that video received thousands of dollars. I'm nowhere near poor, but if I was given an opportunity, I'd probably participate.
I don't personally like model censorship, but you need to come up with a better argument than...whatever that is. It is entirely unconvincing, and seems like you misunderstand what free speech is.
This is the kind of pedantic idealism which motivated me to specifically (spitefully!) forbid explicit recursion last time I designed a general-purpose programming language. Such formalisms may well be beautiful ideas, but we live in a world of actual machines and practical problems. Stacks are real and sufficiently clever compilers do not exist.
Do you use anyone else besides Alibaba?
Easiest way to interact with the team is to follow the github project (add to your watch) and join the slack community.
"It doesn't mean that companies can't be licensed"

Licensed in this discussion obiviously meant the US.

"Coinbase and a16z have already publicly stated that they have plans to set up international arms to hedge against US regulatory risk."

Which is great for them I guess.

"the USA's strong fintech industry"

A tiny, and some might argue irrelevant, part of the US fintech industry is moving offshore.

Crypto to me feels like fusion, it's super relevant, and you just wait some time, you'll see! and then there is another year and another decade and it is still not relevant.
Does philanthropy have to be utilitarian? In the sense that if you donate money your only goal should be scale? Is that the definition?

Which one is better, donating $1 to 100,000 people or $100,000 to one person?

Similarly is donating $10,000 to cancer research better than $10,000 to one person? The cancer research may never have an impact, but it makes us "feel" good becasue it has the potential to change millions of lives.

Just an interesting one to me how we diminish the impact of helping one person when that one person could go on to be a Steve Jobs or the first person in the family to go to college. Literally life changing, where as donating for scale is a drop in the ocean and means almost nothing to a ton of people.
SF Chronicle journalist, Roland Li, has a thread with some more related events. Notably, Westfield is divesting its U.S. properties. In this case, they could not even find a buyer.

https://twitter.com/rolandlisf/status/1668356986256375808?s=...
sum = fn (a, b) -> a + b end

sum.(2, 3)

Maybe a but clunky but no module required.
I've read your comment three times and I've yet to make any sense of it for myself, but good luck to you too. I'm glad you enjoy hunting, growing food, and building things - those are some great hobbies.
Would it have helped if she prefaced it with, "Here's a hypothetical about a company wanting to do illegal things..."?

The style of argument is akin to Reductio ad Absurdum, taking an absurd position to it's logical conclusion. The "absurd position" here is a company wanting to sell heroin on the open market, and she takes that to the logical conclusion.

She could have said "meth", "nuclear weapons", or "dead infants", or whatever instead of heroin to make her point. If you read that as a comparison to Coinbase being a heroin dealer than you're the one editorializing her effort.

Here's another reductio ad absurdum argument:

Let's assume the earth is flat. Either the surface of the earth must go to infinity or people must be walking off the edge of it somewhere.
I took the Christmas Ale tour last year. Little did I know it may be the last! The tour guide made a verrrrrrry interesting and unexpected comment about the rebrand. He said that it was part of the sale contract. I.e. the old owner put it in the contract that they had to rebrand. I am 90% sure I heard that correctly and am not making it up, because it was so strange and unexpected on my ears.
Yeah, but by that definition the majority of highly engaged posts are off topic. How are the two major world powers moving toward conflict less relevant than a lot stuff the here? It effects tech, startups, the economy. If it were to catch on fire, the global semiconductor supply chain would be destroyed.
John Oliver with a quite informative video about why many carbon offsets/carbon credits schemes are most likely not genuine in their attempts to offset carbon emissions.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=6p8zAbFKpW0
I thought he was cool until he launched a chocolate line. Really? Is that what we need? Most of his audience is young gen z, and I'm sure the last thing the most obese generation ever needs is someone pushing more sugar on their diets
Not a fan of these - prove my idea will sell - type of websites.. theres a dozen websites ahead of this ten minute spent clever domained website.
> I'm not sure if I even trust Intel/Windows at this point

It helps that it's Unix on the desktop. If you're comparing against a Windows install then I'm sure yes it will be way snappier, if you're comparing against Linux it really shouldn't be. Linux doesn't always have powersaving down quite right etc though, ofc.

The sales pitch of OS X to powerusers imo is that it's Unix on the desktop that is well-supported by the vendor and has a good ecosystem of professionally made apps. If you want to tinker there's nothing inherently bad about Linux either, but OS X actually does just work fairly well, although it's not without flaws as well. But it's faster than Windows, less amateur than Linux, actually has a user base unlike BSD. So it sits in an interesting spot - the "willing to spend money" niche.

There are a number of downsides and unpleasant aspects to OS X too, of course. But yeah, it's inherently going to be snappier than Windows if that's your reference point, *nix generally is, that's not OSX exclusive either.

People are generally more hostile to vendor hardware-software integration today than they used to be in the past, I think. Amiga, BeOS, SGI, HP-UX, Solaris, Cray, Nonstop, zSystem, CUDA... there is a lot of the computing world that runs on proprietary hardware-software integration and always has.

It has been an interesting sea change that people see open/plays nice as the default, it's an interesting sign of how copyleft has won in the long term that proprietary is seen as greedy/suspicious in general. I've been feeling that's a significant thing for a while. People are hostile to these products when sometimes it's simply paying more for a specific thing or a niche, if you want a premium *nix laptop the M1s are very nice actually.
looks like they're crypto guys

so there's that
This is part survivorship bias in my opinion and probably not very good life advice.
You can and should only do this if you have enough money to sustain at least one year without income. His example is very risky as no income was guaranteed, if you can continue to work in another place why not.
It is true that people get accustomed and complacent to their life situation, jobs, etc. And a change in country or job can shake them out of it. However, success and progress in a lot of things require constand effort over time and this is usually easier if you have a consistent routine. Completely changing your life requires you to find a new routine somewhere else which sets you back at least a month in my experience.
I say this from experience as I quit my job and am working on my own project in another country. It is challenging to do only work and experience less docial interaction as your social network is still in the old place.
The industry is rife with abuse (the Guardian is doing important work highlighting low-additionality offsets [1][2]) but carbon credits are still important. For instance, I work at Recoolit (https://www.recoolit.com/our-work) and we have no other way to pay for our work besides the voluntary carbon markets.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/18/revealed...

[2] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/may/24/chevron-...
It literally just is not. Attention and money are categorically different things. If you want to argue that directing your attention at something is somehow equivalent to spending money on it, then be my guest. But you have not done that. You have shallowly asserted that they are identical with the verb "is". They are not.
That's what ROCm was trying to do
I don't make a blanket judgment on a claim based on some other claim. GP's stance on nuclear has nothing to do with the fact that carbon offsets are an accounting scam designed to virtue signal to the public and allow these mega corporations to continue with business as usual.
Say your understanding is true.

The whole point of regulations is to make various business models impossible.

The job of the SEC is to enforce the existing regulations and the job of lawmakers to (maybe) change the regulations if they think it's important to make this type of business possible in the US. In doing so they have to weigh potential benefits and harms caused by doing so.

The guiding priciples behind the SEC's current mandate and the current regulatory enforcement framework in the US Securities Laws are 1)investor protection, 2)fair, efficient and orderly markets and 3)capital formation[1]. In making changes to the securities laws, lawmakers would have to decide whether these changes would compromise these principles and whether the benefit of doing so might outweigh the downsides.

An impartial observer might look at the crypto markets thus far and decide that they are not (in the main) fair, orderly and efficient and that investors have suffered significant losses due to fraud and other malpractise and decide that it wasn't worth the risk to make changes to facilitate these businesses. That said, the crypto industry has spent a very significant amount lobbying lawmakers so they may decide otherwise.

Either way, it's not the job of the SEC (Securities regulator) to decide coinbase gets a free pass to ignore securities regulation in this case because the existing regulations make their business model impossible.

[1] https://www.sec.gov/about
The US dollar is not a security. They could have a BTC/USD trading pair.
Show HN: Wallpapers AI
Yes. I was referring to Australia’s oldest operating brewery[1].

[1] https://www.cascadebreweryco.com.au/
looking forward to AMD MI300, hopefully will be a game changer
This view still considers homes to be an investment! You cannot eat your cake and have it too; if we evaluate homeownership financially it is fundamentally an investment (even if it is a complex, tax-advantaged, leveraged investment with myriad intangibles) and if we don't then how do we evaluate it? Give me some way, as a hypothetical potential homebuyer, to decide whether buying a home is right for me without making it an investment. I suspect you can't.
Terrible fucking take that could only come from HN. How many cataract surgeries have you funded? How many pounds of trash have you cleaned up from the ocean? Let's hear what a big impact you're having if Mr. Beast's impact is 0.
redis could possibly work, too, depending on how you actually plan to do it
I think Time to start submitting feedback on Google search results that some sub-Reddits pages aren't loading, and others are set to private?
You've been swimming in the VC world too much when you're under the impression that building a Reddit clone is a "$10M-$20M" sized task.
The Onion's take ten years on is a bit different:

https://www.theonion.com/women-explain-why-they-became-tradw...
"In May 2020, the Federal Reserve changed the official formula for calculating the M1 money supply.

Prior to May 2020, M1 included currency in circulation, demand deposits at commercial banks, and other checkable deposits.

After May 2020, the definition was expanded to include other liquid deposits, including savings accounts. This change was accompanied by a sharp spike in the reported value of the M1 money supply."
I don’t have an answer to your question. But I had quite a bit of trouble finding a affordable, drop-in replacement Raspberry Pi for a recent project, so I went looking for alternatives. There are a number of companies that make comparable single board computers and sell them at the $35 price point, for example LibreComputer. The board I received was very nicely put together and worked well for my purposes. The only practical difference between the clone and the genuine Pi was the lack of a Pi-branded GPIO library.