skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Respectfully, this is a tired meme and it needs to die. This is a defeatist attitude that just gets in the way of any progress on improving driving culture. I really would prefer I can just trust the other driver.
Some specialties attract different personalities. If you’ve ever been in a hospital setting around a lot of neuro residents, many of them will present… oddly. It’s a feature. Likewise, a lot of ER docs are kinda adrenaline people who are great at triage and quickly stabilizing you, but maybe not so much good at relating with people. That’s a feature — you don’t need a soft touch dealing with trauma.

If ChatGPT can help someone perform better in their area of weakness, great. If it can help super smart people get information out of their heads, great.
Similarly: "He was right, dead right, as he sped along. But he's just as dead as if he were wrong."
Apple's Secret Weapon to Getting PC Games on Mac
Why do different branches of the government infight like this?
Oracle is one of those companies like Microsoft which many in the tech industry wrote off years ago.

Neither one qualified for the illustrious FAANG acronym.

Ideally, when these things happen people would examine their blindspots.
> does anyone actually think that chat gpt succeeds at rewriting things 'compassionately' or 'more intelligently'?

I've seen non-native English speakers (co-worker) use it to write lengthy apologies to customers, and I (native speaker) think it sounds over the top sincere and dramatic, especially when the same person tends to talk in a completely different manner.

I believe this story, because the customer in this case was satisfied too
I mean, there has to be actual capital at risk somewhere in this transaction, right? Something can’t come from nothing. Otherwise, someone could keep running this trade on repeat until they’ve accumulated an amount equal to the gross product of the universe.
gimli works well enough for actually parsing the DWARF format, but it abstracts over somewhat less than what you would hope (in particular, you get to do all the fun stuff of figuring out where debugging information is yourself--which gets tedious when you want to support things like split-dwarf or debug index).
The greatest SO answer ignores the core issue "But you never know exactly if you've selected what you wanted."
The solution to this is switching verb-object to object-verb like kakoune/helix do, but I guess that goes too much against the "zen of vim"
I don't think anyone actually does counting like that, or at least if they did I agree it would be silly. If I have my eye on a character I'd like to get to, I usually just 'f' + character and then ';' if necessary until I'm in the right place.

The only time I use numbers to specifically target a location is when jumping to a line. I have relative line numbers turned on (line numbers are relative to the cursor) so I always know the exact number I need to type to move to the line I'm looking at.
The default front page is like reading gossip magazines. A lot of those subs appeal to base instincts (rage bait, etc) and are worth making a strong effort to avoid and ignore.
And experience is the practical contact with and observation of facts, over an extended period.

Most English dictionaries explicitly separate out “formal judgment by an expert” as a distinct meaning for “opinion” from the more common meaning of personal subjective no-facts-needed belief.
I think the problem is that devs believe they need to create a unique snowflake app every time, each with it's own special sauce.

Visual basic was different because there was only one way to create a button, so no way to over engineer a new button component. All apps looked the same and nobody cared.
> I strongly suspect that New Reddit is the one that the vast, vast majority of users user.

No doubt, those people are masochists, either knowingly or not, same with the people that use the official app. Old.reddit and/or third party apps made a huge difference in usability of Reddit, there is a reason so many people are up in arms over this change.

If it took subs going dark for you to see what was available to you all along that's yet another massive failing on reddit's part to provide value. To people who have been living that dream via third party apps, that was a normal Tuesday. I don't know a better way to put it, I constantly hear people say "I've been using the app, it's fine" and then also saying things like you did, the truth is the app is not fine, discoverability is shit, the features are limited, etc. Apollo is a power tool for reddit similar to how RES was, I won't wade through the reddit BS to use it without an app like Apollo.
You might be misunderstanding what Cal Newport is saying here because he agrees with you. He is saying is the people who stay on top of their inboxes and multitask are perceived as being the most productive, not that they are in fact the most productive. He also wrote an entire book that might as well be about his hatred of email titled "A World Without Email," if you need further evidence of his position.
Hi swyx, the weights are also open sourced at https://huggingface.co/gorilla-llm Let us know if you are unable to access them.
> She also reached out to Sasha Ganji, the lawyer whose signature was appended to the letter she’d received from the law firm appearing to represent SavantCare. Ganji never touched the document, he told Dean; apparently someone had used his name and signature without his knowledge.

That is a serious thing to do. This is criminal fraud right?
> The current Reddit UX does not encourage and maybe doesn’t even support that view.

Try: https://old.reddit.com
If you want a parsable response, have it wrap that with ```. Include an example request/response in your history. Treat any message you can’t parse as an error message.

This works well because it has a place to put any “keep in mind” noise. You can actually include that in your example.
Ask HN: Can iMessages Be Retroactively Encrypted?
Specifically, encrypted with the benefit they are not retrievable by a third-party?

Per this article [0]. a specific combo of iCloud sync’ing settings will make iMessages encrypted to any unwanted 3rd-party. Question is can this state be retroactively imposed on historic messages that didn’t have this specific state originally.

[0] https://appleinsider.com/articles/20/01/21/what-apple-surrenders-to-law-enforcement-when-issued-a-subpoena
Often new, independent journalists will claim that the mainstream media is lying to the citizens and when I replace "mainstream media" with "my competitors" it makes a lot more sense.

"My competitors are lying to you" is a variation of the "my competitors have a bad product" claim that I imagine many small businesses make to discredit the market leader.

Does it mean that the market leaders have a better product? Not necessarily, but I don't automatically trust a business to be honest about its competitors, especially if the business is new and gets market share by directly attacking its competitors.
I've literally just come home from a meeting with a colleague where we were discussing software/IT project management. We were discussing how terrible modern software project management generally is, and how identifying and focussing on a small number of priorities and clearing them is way more productive than doing "everything everywhere all at once".

I've been working on turning this into a training course for my domain, and have come to ask the question, "why oh why do we prioritise deadlines over productivity"?

Building a software team which can reliably deliver high quality features is way more efficient than grinding out huge piles of barely working crap to a deadline. But deadline management really is still how most of us are forced to do things. Formal Road Maps, Gantt Charts and Microsoft Project put productivity against the wall before the project even starts. Teams don't get to push back on features that they know will kill a project, and project managers seem to think their role is to hit people over the head until morale improves and features are delivered, no matter what. (I've had a project manager who quite literally refused to prioritise features because "they are all important").

What a stupid way to build things. No wonder 27%+ of software projects end up in the bin.

Keanu Reeves focussed on the top priorities that everything else in the franchise relied on, delivered them with high quality, and was able to build the rest of the franchise around that central effort. Loads of work up front, much less work over time.

I only wish this was how most companies approached software.
I thought GPT-4 was doing a pretty good job at outputting JSON (for some of the toy problems I've given it like some of my gardening projects.) Interesting to see this hit the very top of HN
Relatives of family slain by ‘catfishing’ cop plan to sue over his hiring
libdwarf is the most complete C library, Rust options are also quite good. We already support both DWARF and PDB in Rizin[1] but working hard on improving that support[2]

[1] https://github.com/rizinorg/rizin/tree/dev/librz/bin

[2] https://rizin.re/posts/gsoc-2023-announcement/#billow-debug-...
You're not wrong. My take is this: the context of this debate is, for many, "China caused the Covid pandemic intentionally and conspired to hide their culpability." It's a big claim, literally a conspiracy theory, so I'd put it at the standards of a criminal trial. This is circumstantial evidence and, while it's certainly evidence that could be used to prosecute that claim, it isn't a case of China being caught in flagrante delicto. In particular, the screaming headline "First people sickened by Covid-19 were scientists at WIV" is very weak. There are reports from someone that people at WIV were sick. Nothing firmly supporting that it was Covid, and nothing but anonymously-sourced evidence that people at WIV were even sick.
Having had a number of bad colds before I actually got a bad flu, I always thought my colds were the flu. Not a huge deal. When it was confirmed to be the flu when I talked to her later, the mobile doctor said that many people think the same because they tupically don't go to the doctor for confirmation, if the doctor even chooses to test.

A real (non-covid) flu had me feeling like I was on death's door for a week, and much of that time was spent wishing it would take me.
SystemTap or ebpf might be the way to go for visibility at that level. Not quite a debugger, but they can be very helpful.
Better better headline: captured regulatory body acts as mouthpiece for anti-consumer manufacturers, attempts to leverage federal powers to nullify massively popular legislation.
This is a little off topic, but some people might find this useful. I have bindings that allow me to execute the current line or paragraph under the cursor in the underlying shell and then inject the result into the current buffer.

"execute the contents of the current line => sx
exe "nnoremap " . g:leader_prime . "x :call ExecuteCurrentLine()\<CR>"

Here leader_prime is just a second leader key I use: 's', but you could map the command however you like. ExecuteCurrentLine() is implemented as:

function! ExecuteCurrentLine()
let l:com = substitute(getline('.'), '\#', '\\#', '')
exe "norm! mc"
exe "norm! o\<Esc>"
exe "r! " . l:com
exe "norm! mr"
exe "norm! o\<Esc>"
endfunction

Two more mappings:

exe "nnoremap " . g:leader_prime . "p :call ExecuteCurrentParagraph()\<CR>"
exe "nnoremap " . g:leader_prime . "c :call ExecuteCurrentLineWithBC()\<CR>"

and their implementations:

function! ExecuteCurrentParagraph()
let l:init = line('.')
exe "norm! {j"
let l:start = line('.')
exe "norm! }"
let l:end = line('.')
exe "norm! o\<Esc>"
exe "r! " . join(getline(l:start,l:end), ' ')
exe "norm! o\<Esc>"
endfunction

function! ExecuteCurrentLineWithBC()
let l:com = getline('.')
exe "norm! o\<Esc>"
exe "r! " . "echo 'scale=12;" . l:com . "' | bc"
exe "norm! o\<Esc>"
endfunction

As written above, I type 'sx' to execute the current line under the cursor as a shell command, and then inject the result back into the buffer where I am. 'sp' does the same, but for the entire paragraph the cursor is on; this is really convenient for things like a large sql query which is more readable written over many lines. And finally 'sc' executes the current line in the bc calculator program in the underlying shell, so you can evaluate arithmetic expressions in the buffer.
Oh, you suppose the authors spent their time writing that for no reason? You know better than them? Your explanation is so incomplete I hardly know where to begin. Maybe with the fact that you're talking about local ordering as it may or may not be perturbed by a compiler, while the document is talking about the observed order elsewhere (other processors or main memory). That observed order can vary depending on the processor's ordering model, and to ensure it (e.g. across all modifications to a complex shared data structure) without doing the memory equivalent of an fsync() on every file write (disastrous!) you need memory barriers. All of the bugs I mentioned, all of which were crashes, were related to exactly the distinction you're missing. Yours is the kind of mythology that OP sought to address. Please read the document - particularly the section on CPU memory barriers and anywhere that mentions Alpha - before spreading more misinformation.
I read the thread. It's not that interesting.
that's kinda like asking what kind of properties alcohol would need to exhibit to qualify as an opiate. it's similar in some ways, but the definition of "opiate" excludes alcohol.

if your definition of "psychedelic" is "drug that makes you see weird stuff", then sure, ketamine and MDMA can be psychedelics. but some people use a stricter definition based on chemistry and/or mechanism of action. under this definition, MDMA is pretty different than LSD, and ketamine is very different from both.
This is exclusively about audits
I suspect they see "you get the be the moderator in a community!" as a user feature, and not as an internal job.

And people clearly want to do it, and care enough to do it for free. Up to a point, at least.
Thank you! As a continental guy, I wasn't quite sure myself, when and how the UK joined this madness. In all fairness: adopting metric on the one hand, but also US billions on the other hand, is a bit odd, not to say, confusing… Is this the British idea of diplomacy? :-)
Well I think this is a bit reductionistic. Every business is a business, but just about every business also won't cross certainly highly-profitable morally-dubious or long-term damaging paths.

A car company could maximize short-term profits by reducing quality. Reddit could sell your location data to the highest bidder. Apple could threaten to delete all your pictures unless you buy a super-pro account.

And generally companies don't do this, because the backlash. The backlash is good. Often the backlash is even good for the long-term health of the company/world.

I think to say that short-term-profit-oriented behavior from companies is inevitable isn't true, the backlash often wins, and long-term strategic thinking is actually the norm.
Does $0.77m per MW describe plant capacity or realized output? Is that a national average or is that for a particular geography?

Looking at some more modern projects and it is actually looking pretty good. I don't know how to account for unused capacity as it seems most PV util setups use about 30% of their capacity (do you just multiply the cost by 1.7?)

Case 1:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karap%C4%B1nar_solar_power_pla...

2023 Turkey - 1300MW capacity and a construction cost of 1.3b USD puts it at ~ $1m/MW capacity which is incredible.

Case 2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Signal_Solar

2018 USA - construction cost of $1.1b (maybe) and a capacity of 615MW so ~1.8m per MW

Case 3 (China nuclear)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fangjiashan_Nuclear_Power_Plan... is ~ 1.8m USD per MW capacity if we can trust their numbers.

Assuming a utilization of 80% (like other nuclear plants) this seems at worst cost competitive?
The cover up talks to the culture, which talks to the risk given the era and country involved.

Dams are more dangerous than reactors in general, but really we should be looking at the risk of specific projects given all those factors.
Varying sources but anything from .25% to 3% or more depending on how they get their seat I think.

Some with no vesting schedules at all.

https://medium.com/@theBoardlist/three-things-no-one-tells-y...
It's interesting to see this comment[1] from him that users should still be able to see content from a deleted post or comment if they want to. It used to be possible to do this by searching for it in Pushshift, but for as long as I've been aware of Pushshift it seems the admins have hated this. I've seen comments that this is a violation of privacy and can be used for targeted harassment. I understand the complaints Reddit has had recently about Pushshift being used to sell Reddit's content, but it seems that's not the only thing that's changed.

1: https://reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/3cxedn/i_am_steve_huffman...
Add a low pass filter, i.e. a capacitor of correct value, to decouple the power noise from the LED.

Here’s another technique to pick up information remotely with a video camera: a laser microphone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_microphone
All commercial pilots I know are armed. Not sure how necessary this second barrier is, but likely a small cost when factored into overall ticket prices.
“Apple got bored of it when they decided Metal was the future. AMD got bored of it when they developed rocm and HIP”

Apple backed OpenCL because they needed an alternative after their divorce with Nvidia. No one was going to target an AMD alternative when they had such a trivial market share, so it had to be an open standard. Initially this arrangement was highly productive and OpenCL 1.x enjoyed terrific success. Vendors across compute markets piled support behind OpenCL and many even started actively participating in it. However this success is what precipitated the disastrous OpenCL 2.x series. In other words, OpenCL 2.x was far too revolutionary for many and far too conservative for others. What followed was Apple pulling out to pursue Metal, AMD having shoddy drivers, Nvidia all but ignoring it, and mobile chip vendors basically sticking to 1.2 and nothing more. Eventually this deadlock was fixed after OpenCL 3.0 walked back the changes of 2.x, but this was in large part because the backers of 2.x moved to SYCL.

As for AMD, OpenCL was a tremendous boon when it was first introduced. At least initially it gave them a fighting chance against CUDA. But it was never realistic for OpenCL to be a complete CUDA alternative. I mean, any standard that is basically “everything in CUDA and possibly more” is a standard no one could afford or bother to implement. ROCm and HIP are basically AMD using an API people are already familiar with software underneath to play to the strengths of their hardware.

“AMD are also the main competitor in the space but all but totally dropped support for GPGPU in desktop cards, trying to instead focus on gaming for Radeon and compute in MI/CDNA.”

Keep in mind that AMD has been under intense pressure to deliver world class HPC systems, and they managed to do so with ORNL Frontier. I don’t blame them for being selective with ROCm support because most of those product lines were in flight before ROCm started development in earnest. That said, Nvidia is obviously the clear leader for hardware support, as therefore the safest option for desktop users.
Yeah, 95 looks really good. So does OS 8. Can’t believe how pixelated OS X looks in retrospect. That didn’t age super well, but it looked pretty at the time.
In the sciences we just call this grad school
f I use second most. It has so many uses all of which could be done with / command, but definitely you come to prefer f. I use f( to scan forward to the next open paren. Then I use di( to delete in parens for example to remove the arguments. Uppercase F does the same but backward up the text. Often I use f, to go to a comma. df, to delete up to the next comma as in removing just 1 argument. The only draw back is that f does not have any repeat shortcut like n for next or . for reapply, those do nothing for f. I should mention also that f works on a single line at a time unlike /
The idea that this hasn't been tried repeatedly is a myth.
Isn't the third-party API access issue all about preventing Reddit from being overrun by AI/LLM robots? I suppose nothing is stopping them from using web interfaces but it does seem a bit harder than just using APIs
The commit that caused OP's bug changed two lines.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/lin...
NHTSA definitely seems like one of the more dysfunctional agencies. The US headlight standard from 1967 has never been updated to allow modern adaptive headlight designs despite at least two decades of requests from car manufacturers.

Congress finally forced NHTSA to take action in 2021 with a timeline of two years, but they still aren't available because now the NHTSA is dragging their feet on testing. Meanwhile American car companies like Ford sell adaptive headlights overseas but we make do with 1960's technology in the US. I wonder how many lives have been lost in the meantime?
Which is why the Java Memory Model exists, and why a number of other languages just copied it.

A lot of problems with threading got sorted out under the auspices of making Java work right on your hardware/operating system.
The U.S. banking system is sound and resilient. That is a relief.
Yes, exactly, I also have worked directly with network SMSC's (the service managing the SMS integration with the cellular network), and this is absolutely the case. Networks can and do both spoof, delay or refuse to send delivery reports, or will charge extra for them.
Heads up display for cycling/navigating

Fundamentally though I see AR as how we give our AI personal assistants our eyes ears and real life action space evaluator.

Everything from highlighting objects you’re searching for to giving instant information about anything you look at that you want to know about.

It will also give you perfect recall

Hey siri where did I leave that toilet brush two weeks ago? How many pages of [Book] did I read on average last week? What was that pattern that [person] wearing when we were at the farmers market last week?
Cato article "SF Gov't failure" is incorrect and misleading. SF elected officials (mayor, board of supervisors, DA etc.) have publically stated goals and policies approved by the votors (residents of SF). Such goals and policies do create conditions that have, and will continue to, undermine CRE values, but it is a mistake and is misleading to call this a failure of government. The people have spoken, and are getting exactly what they have asked for.
Nobody is going to hear about someone not wearing a seatbelt dying in an accident and blame it on the manufacturer of the vehicle.
Texas bans kids from social media without parental consent
As someone that knows several doctors very well (decades of friendship, weekly coffee or drinks), you are really over estimating the average patient doctor outside of basically surgeons.

A doctor might have everything you describe. But they don't have the time, energy, or desire to spend much time discussing things with patients.

Similar to a car mechanic. They know a lot. And if it's their car or their father's question, they can probably walk you through rebuilding an engine over the phone. But try getting a real answer out of one during a visit.

The power of some of these AI bots is that you can query them to your hearts desire until you are really satisfied.
Awesome! Great idea I'll check this out. Thanks :)
They're not profitable because they choose to not be profitable, because they have too many employees and are trying to be the next TikTok.

If they operated like archive.org, they could sustain themselves. They don't want to do that, because it doesn't result in big returns for investors.
Could be nixon from hell