skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's a social and economic problem.

The NVD and CVE teams are very low staffed, with people who get a large amount of reports every day. There is no way they can process each report as thoroughly as people want them to while reporting the security issues as fast as possible. I can understand the frustration, but there should be some consideration for these facts.

The social issue continues in that people want some quick and easy to understand number, because they and their company also cannot process in a short time if these security vulns are substantial or not.

Then there's gaming of the system where products with bugs do not want to be exposed as insecure, so they will try to lower the scores assigned to them. Then there's pentesters who want to get high scoring bugs for bounties and clout, and they will try to raise the scores...

All this ends up where the scores mean very little, but it's the best we have. I've seen vulns with a 9+ that are clearly not exploitable, and ones that are 6-7 which are powerful easily exploitable primitives.
This seems pretty backwards in the age of AI, where semantic search can ingest and numerically sort embeddings with extraordinary finesse.
Everything gets re-appropriated by art, from mpeg frame skips to messy bedrooms.

Many of the quirks of our technology, like audio distortion for example, quickly become key components of certain styles. I remember as a child growing up in a funny valley after the acceptance of analogue distortion but before the widespread adaption of digital distortion.

Right now I'm thinking of someone like James Gerde, where the frame-to-frame shifts of AI imagination are part of the aesthetic. I think it's only a matter of time before this effect is matched up with something that makes emotional sense, and then it will blow up.
vitalik and the ethereum foundation hold less than 0.5% of the eth supply.
There is not a word on how the AI system was designed in the study, so no idea how well it worked and if it was frustrating or easy to use. I can totally see someone using chatbots from 2021 and 2022 daily getting depressed :D
That's why we built react.email, you should check these examples: https://demo.react.email/preview/airbnb-review
ByeJira
Why would interest rates affect companies that are buying houses with cash?
What exactly is COP/EOD? I assume from the context that EOD is End of Day, but COP? I know COB (Close of Business) and it's fairly related to EOD and makes much more sense. They used COP in multiple places in the article, so I'm hoping it's not a copy/paste typo and is instead just some acronym that I don't know.
Moog and InMusic: A New Chapter of Innovation and Collaboration Begins
A clog in the machine? Like when an eggcorn gets jammed in the cogwheels and gears, I suppose...

I've worked at 3 small shops over the past 15 years (wow, 20 as a "young millenial"? You're busy!), and I'm on the older side of millenial...yes, cards get passed around, but no, flowers don't typically get sent out. There's a couple people who make sure that wedding anniversaries, employment anniversaries, birthdays etc. get mentioned at company meetings, most of us engineers shrivel under the spotlight. I have noticed that many of my coworkers glow when they get a compliment - "Take the time off, you deserve it after that hard work on the Acme Inc project", "Your services were rock solid and needed no maintenance while you were out for surgery", etc. but flowers? Cards? Don't care.

We DO make sure to send flowers and cards to the boomer-generation receptionists who pass the cards. I don't think the rest of us would care if the birthday cards stopped going around, but it's clearly of critical importance to those ladies.
Drugs alleviate the symptoms it doesn't fix the cause. Also the body tends to crave more of it after extended use.
Avaje JVM Libraries
I've been having a blast coding with these set of Java libraries (so much so that I've become a regular contributor to help smooth some rough edges). To me it feels like I'm using Spring, but with the speed and compile-time safety of dagger.

With the exception of the config-library, they all use annotation processing to generate readable java code that perform the library's main functions. It's got stuff for DI, using Java's HttpClient like Feign, Json Mapping and even add lightweight spring style controllers for frameworks like javalin or helidon nima. I like how readable the generated code is as well, so I can easily debug and understand what's actually happening.
Are you currently using it? I would love to hear what you like most about it.
If it was a security, but no longer is, the sale of an unregistered security back then was still a violation of the law that (barring statutes of limitations) could presumably still be prosecuted. The sale of ETH today would not be if it has transitioned into commodity status.

The Howey test would be applied to the status of the asset at the time of the alleged violation of the law that is being prosecuted.
Show HN is for sharing your personal work

HN FAQ:

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html
> Sure It’s only at 720p.

Some instances offer DASH which gives you up to 4K depending your bandwidth IIRC.
FinGPT: Open-Source Financial Large Language Models
No mention of PHP SDK?

I see your docs mention a composer package in the PHP section.
I'm enjoying using it for overall family/personal data organization. Took me a year to migrate in, and I allow myself the privilege of reorganizing as needed; but I've found it super simple and super stress-relieving.

I do allow myself subsubdirs wherever it makes sense though. E.g. right now I have a file browser open to "64.05 TV Shows" (60 - 69 is "Media"; 64 is "Video"), and within 64.05 I have one subdir per TV show. I don't feel obliged to give each show a special number, and I also don't feel troubled by each show being a sub(sub)dir. This system is searchable and browsable within my tolerances.
Not sure why OP has typoed it twice, but they're talking about Nostr.
> [1]: Super-resolution imaging (SR) is a class of techniques that enhance (increase) the resolution of an imaging system.

It looks pretty clear to me that a Super Resolution Algorithm enhances images (aka Image Enhancement).

Although I think you missed the point of my post. As long as you can get an expert witness to certify the accurate you can use a technique in court.

Somebody else [2] linked the Rittenhouse case as an example as to this being disallowed but that's not what the Rittenhouse case shows. The Prosecution wanted to use pinch-to-zoom; the defense challenged that zooming wouldn't be an accurate representative; the Judge asked the Prosecution if/how they knew that zooming would be an accurate representation; the Prosecution admitted they had no idea how pinch-to-zoom works; the Judge (very reasonable) didn't allow an unknown method to be used in court. The lack of an expert witness to explain how Zooming wouldn't've changed the image was the problem.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-resolution_imaging

[2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36297039
I think this misses the point: regardless of Resend's exit strategy, they are innovating now, unlike the competition (allegedly), and that's the value proposition.
Less so than you might expect.

Because it's a single wavelength, ground stations can be much more efficient than solar; this means 80-90% for the relevant frequencies rather than 20-45% for typical solar PV.

Given the size of the ground stations are necessarily enormous, the energy can be quite dilute and still "interesting" power output.

I don't think it'll pass the geopolitics test, as you need to prove to your enemies that it can't be abused; and I have yet to hear any proponents seriously consider what can go wrong if there's more than one over the horizon at any one time (that reminds me, I do need to write this up properly…), but if there's only one then the maths says it's probably safe.

Unfortunately, the very thing that makes it safe is another reason for pessimism (on Earth): a back-of-the envelope calculation suggests the ground stations have to use about 50,000 tons of aluminium given the size constraints are based on wavelengths, regardless of the power going through them. That's not much for one, but if you need four thousand of them then it's comparable to a 2 TW antipodal power grid which would make space beaming redundant anyway.

I can easily see this being used on a Mars colony to get past the global dust storms, but I don't really see it becoming a major player on Earth thanks to the political issues and the alternatives.
Ketamine Retreats Seek to Help Professionals Find Work-Life Balance
Oh, now I understand where the directory structure comes from at work.

I hate it.

The problems I have with it (some of them implementation details that can probably be fixed)

- On smaller projects, you have a big directory tree of nothing, with maybe a quarter of the directories being populated. This is because it starts from a template.

- You tend to get long directory paths, enough to get over MAX_PATH in some instances, don't fit in a single line, etc...

- Remembering arbitrary numbers is hard. Try using arbitrary numbers in your code for your variables, I am sure it will be appreciated...

- And especially when there are several number based systems in place. So you have the software version number, the ticket number, the number system used by your customer, etc... Do you really want another number system on top of that?

- The article says there is no overlap. There is never "no overlap" in the real life. For example, as a dev, I should have nothing to do in the "sales" folder, except that the technical specifications are here because they are part of the contract. It really belongs in both "sales" and "dev".

- I still use search as may primary tool.

Note that someone mentioned the military. I have worked on defense contracts, they are the worst. Acronyms and codes everywhere, I guess they are too special to name things with regular words. And I am talking about the unclassified stuff, it is even worse when confidential information is involved: "The name should follow the ZB4455 convention, ZB4455 is in document L45.34c, can I have L45.34c? No it is classified, but actually, it just means it should be lowercase and start with an underscore." So I wouldn't take what the military does as a good example.
Like it or not, crypto is going to stay. If the US pulls out the vacuum will be filled by those that the Americans consider criminal jurisdictions - Russia, China etc. or hopefully by competing powers - EU, Japan. The opportunities here as an alternate financial system will not be ignored by the rest of the world.

The desire that this should be confined to academic is nothing but a pipe dream at this point.
https://archive.is/M3qNc
> Any crypto sceptic who does not see a problem with this is tainted by their priors.

I'm not qualified to comment on the legal or financial aspects, but this is a hostile and aggressive statement that detracts from the conversation.

You made a claim and offered reasons why you believe that claim. The correct thing to do from there is to allow other people to defend the other position, not end the discussion by saying "and if you disagree with me you're self-deluded".
You can transmit on specific wavelengths which means weather would be less of an issue and this could transmit at night.
Object detection is solved; I'm not sure if everyone advocating for LIDAR is theorycrafting or just hasn't watched any FSD Beta videos, but all of the mistakes the system makes in the course of the drive seem to fall into the realm of unperformant decision-making, like predicting what bikes or pedestrians are going to do, or being too timid to enter a roundabout with another car also entering the roundabout to your left, or stopping in the middle of the road on a divided highway during an unprotected left turn to yield for right traffic (instead of positioning itself parallel to the traffic in the median in the first place).
It's a funny one, because it depends on how you count. In terms of frequency of wars, we seem to be on a downwards trends, with some historical polities (say such as Rome) engaging in war pretty much constantly.

In terms of absolute casualty numbers, the trend seems to be mostly reversed. That's mostly due to the deadliness of modern weaponry as well as the increased state capacity of the combatants.

On the third hand, casualty numbers as a percentage of total population are probably still down, mostly driven by the very large population growth.
I like this approach of integrating instead of replacing. Would love to see more abstractions above legacy/obsolete tools.
Overall the description of the atmosphere holds up to this day too.
The thing with libraries is that they're full of librarians. For some reason, it has fallen out of vogue for all but the oldest/largest companies (and government agencies) to hire librarians to work outside their libraries.
This piece smelled fishy, but then I noticed the footnote that states this is adapted from a Peterson Academy course. That explains the cherry picked citations from impressive sounding social scientists which leads to "evo psych says" as if evo psych is (a) a consensus and (b) something anybody should take seriously. Plus, citing The Great Gatsby makes me think you haven't read a novel since high school. It's just pseudoscience and faux intellectualism all the way down.
You can't reason how the end of humanity is going to happen based on priors, because it's never happened. Whenever it happens, (and it will definitely happen,) it will be unprecedented. It also won't matter how many times the (doomer) boy has cried wolf and been wrong.
Why does helping people have to be selfless? Why can’t it be something people do loud and proud and for transparent reasons?

I don’t see why it has be done with the utmost anonymity for it to count
A wake was to listen for bells:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_coffin
It's really not pedantry, if anything oil is more 'valuable' than (especially) coal and natgas in terms of the energy transition - it is much much harder to replace oil based products (aviation fuels, diesel for heavy industrial use for example) than it is to switch off coal power plants.
What in the world is going on here? Why is there so much hate for this project?

Adding optional ETH donations is cool. I have no idea if it'll work well, but it's cool to try.

Adding ML/AI content moderation is a no-brainer and cool to see. I don't know if it'll work well, but it's cool to try.

Tags are probably not going to scale well in terms of UX, so it'd probably be better to move to a subreddit type architecture.

I'm not sure I like upvotes/downvotes, but if it's well implemented (similarly to HN) it could work okay.

Nice project, and I hope something new like this takes off.
Less affected by cloud albedo and thus more effectively contributing to global warming by increasing the amount of energy that makes it through the atmosphere. That's tongue-in-cheek of course, but I do find it interesting that not many seem concerned about this problem. The experiments have almost no effect of course but if this were ever done on a large scale...

There are a few more "advantages" (if one wants to frame it that way) over collecting sunlight on the surface, for one the sun always shines in space and depending on the satellite's orbit it could collect energy almost 24/7. It could also be sent to different ground stations depending on demand. In theory, if it ever became viable.
Right, so the "secret" to blowing up your life is just to have massive savings, income and rental property, so that instead of owning your possessions, you can just rent them for 2x the cost of ownership while being a digital nomad.

Got it.

Just in case someone finds this "profound".
We do have PHP [0] and Laravel SDKs [1]. It's mentioned on the homepage as well.

[0]: https://github.com/resendlabs/resend-php
[1]: https://github.com/resendlabs/resend-laravel
A less automated version is 5 Calls: https://5calls.org
"Let me say that what the US government is doing wouldn't even be controversial in 99% of the world, including probably 90% of democracies" Really? I'd say perhaps you need to back your estimates with some sort of hard data but these numbers are really plucked out of thin air...

Your whole post reeks of whataboutism and classic fallacies. To address:

1) US agencies can track 'dormant terror cells' from adversaries without hovering up everyone's data.

2) And let's not forget about Chinese drones. If your assumption that they were indeed launched from onshore agents, US agencies can triangulate data and get a few POIs under surveillance - not every single person, everywhere, all the time.

3) The drug carters points is laughable.
But unless there's evidence showing that training on multiple inputs produces worse final outcomes than training on just one alone, it seems that having multiple sensors should be a net positive.

Go train a CNN on 4k images and then go train a CNN on those same images at VGA resolution and you'll see just how problematic a larger set of inputs can be for minimal gains!

I have never argued that LIDAR couldn't be used by an already trained autonomous system in the same manner that a human driver is presented with LIDAR sensory inputs! An android seems to be the trajectory we're on if we want a machine to have the same embodied decision making that humans are capable of.

Like I said in my original comment, this infinity of embodied experiences seems to be software problem, not a sensor problem.
One of the more amusing parts of this blog is that it contains at least two typos: "arrors" and "ancoding" and I can't tell if they were on purpose.
"Any [person] who [disagrees with me] is [committing an error]" is a thought-terminating statement. Best to avoid using that kind of language -- it doesn't particularly hurt anyone else, but it will hurt the growth of one's own understanding.
I watched a docuseries on CuriosityStream last week where they seemed to be discussing this. The researchers in that case said Neanderthal genes were associated with greater tendency toward addiction and depression, possibly autism, and probably helped European Homo sapiens become white faster.

The autism thing was particularly fascinating, because they were doing this based on growing miniature incomplete brains in petri dishes using pure sapiens and pure neanderthalensis variants, hooking those brains up to robots, and comparing behavior. I had no idea that was possible to do.
Perhaps I was unclear: None of those additional specs change the wire protocol - Just like IMAP, HTTP and DNS doesn't change how TCP/IP works. I.e. MTC is a sysex format, General Midi is just instruments names -> program numbers assignments + CC/RPN mappings. The tuning stuff are typically RPN messages. MPE hogs all channels for sending poly-expressions but its all using the basic Midi 1.0 message types

you originally wrote:
> ... Various extensions are only sporadically supported, so in effect you typically don't have any more capability than the simplest version of the protocol anyway.

This is just not true - every device have different capabilities and you control them with what ever midi messages the device responds to. Sometimes they follow those standards and other times the don't.
I.e. I can control the Reverb level on a Yamaha AN1X through CC#91 (which is a General Midi defined controller mapping for Effect 1 level). If I send CC#91 to an Arturia MicroFreak it will change ARP/SEQ rate. Sure it's a little annoying that I have to read the midi implementation list for each of my devices, but I'm not going to give up and never control those settings just because the don't align with the published extensions.
Tracking does not significantly increase the amount of available energy out of a plot of land. It just reduces the amount of PV panels you need to efficiently utilize it. If you tile land with horizontal PV, all photons that hit that land hit them.

And once PV is cheap enough, the expense of tracking (and especially the maintenance expense of tracking!) to deploy a little less silicon does not make any sense.
It can be seen as a transgression because you're knowingly choosing words that will cause someone distress.

In my experience people are normally careful about what kind of jokes they make around someone who has suffered a traumatic experience, an "there's a time and a place" kind of thing.

I believe many people would find it transgressive to make jokes about public transport around someone whose child had recently been killed by a bus.

You can see this even in popular culture. I'd give the famous "Don't mention the war" episode of Fawlty Towers as an example.

I think it's part of the human experience to exhibit sensitivity towards others and to reflect that in your language.
Llama.cpp runs better than pytorch on a much wider variety of hardware, including mobile phones, Raspberry Pis and more.
Is there some kind of billionaire game he is playing? If he bankrupts Twitter completely, can he write off the loss? And is that a way he can turn a debacle into a tax credit better that results in his total tax going down across his companies? I'm assuming not all his actions are late night tweet experiments.
I believe login.gov was made by 18F, a highly specialized group of hackers. Yes they technically are out of GSA but their individual backgrounds are no joke. Check out their GitHub https://github.com/18F
Asahi Lina comes to mind.

https://virtualyoutuber.fandom.com/wiki/Asahi_Lina#Trivia
Sam Altman’s India comments spark a heated backlash
I use vim and don't futz around with my config. I feel like this is a perpetual myth that vim or emacs requires endless tinkering. I maybe touch it once a year, and I still have:

- LSP support - code actions, hover, gotos, linting.

- Fuzzy finding with previews (with syntax highlighting thanks to bat)

- Integrated Git

- Integrated Terminal

- Integrated Debugger

It's a real shame that IntelliJ and VSCode users scare beginners off from trying out all the amazing editors like Vim, Barebones, Nova, etc. with this FUD that they won't get anything done. I've seen people swap between editors like SOs in high school and I've been able to consistently stick with Vim my entire career, so maybe the FOTM editor crowd are really not seeing the gains in productivity they believe they are getting by always picking the "out of the box" editor.
If you want to see some of the baseline results, they're in section 7: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.07179.pdf
Have they meaningfully responded to the moderation strike yet?
There undoubtedly has been a cultural change. But I would argue that the cultural change happened gradually and somewhat later. Closer to 2010 than to 2000 and was probably caused by the "Endless September Syndrome" triggered by the rise of the smartphone and the influx of mobile users. What we have seen in this transition is a consolidation of services. News sites and blogs started to migrate to hosted comments systems like Disqus and eventually disabling comments entirely therefore the discussions moved to Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, HN, etc.. Plenty of companies merged so everything became a lot more centralized. And the structure of the public changed, the ratio of users compared to devs/creators/publishers/etc. grew very much.

Services like Amazon, eBay, Yahoo Mail, predate de term Web 2.0 yet they are considered part of Web 2.0. So at least initially Web 2.0 coexisted with Web 1.0. Even today you can still publish static websites (and some people do) even if no one calls them Web 1.0. This just shows that these terms, which were invented after the DotCom bubble burst, were just buzzwords to try and drum interest.

I would say the DotCom bubble itself and the mobile revolution were far more significant and statistically measurable than the impact of Web 2.0.