skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
(share link) https://www.wsj.com/articles/where-you-can-still-find-a-work...

One of the interesting things about this article is its data sources...

> Sources: Job postings trends are based on an analysis of more than 250 million employment listings since 2014 by WFH Map, a group of researchers from Harvard University and the London School of Economics and Political Science, among others. Workplace trends are based on analysis by Scoop Technologies, a software company that tracks policies of about 4,500 companies.

And that 'group of researchers' is a link which leads you to https://wfhmap.com (honestly, the wsj article is a restatement and summarization of this data)

Digging into this a bit more, they've got methods (after all, that's really what you want to find when you look for data...) https://wfhmap.com/algorithm/

> Our Large Language Model (LLM) is built using the DistilBERT attention-based transformer model. Transformers are a deep-learning method in which every output element is connected to every input element of a text sequence, for example, with weights on each element dynamically calculated as the text is processed.

> This LLM is then pre-trained on the entire English-language Wikipedia corpus, which helps the framework interpret the intended meaning of a given document or passage.

> We further pre-train this model on roughly one million text sequences drawn from our corpus of new online vacancy postings. This ensures the language model is familiar with the language of job ad text.

The data can be downloaded - aggregate data is available without signup, more detailed data with signup or upon request.

There's also their working paper ( https://wfhmap.com/wp-content/uploads/w31007.pdf ) - not a light read at 58 pages.

The abstract for this paper is:

> The pandemic catalyzed an enduring shift to remote work. To measure and characterize this shift, we examine more than 250 million job vacancy postings across five English-speaking countries. Our measurements rely on a state-of-the-art language-processing framework that we fit, test, and refine using 30,000 human classifications. We achieve 99% accuracy in flagging job postings that advertise hybrid or fully remote work, greatly outperforming dictionary methods and also outperforming other machine-learning methods. From 2019 to early 2023, the share of postings that say new employees can work remotely one or more days per week rose more than three-fold in the U.S and by a factor of five or more in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the U.K. These developments are highly non-uniform across and within cities, industries, occupations, and companies. Even when zooming in on employers in the same industry competing for talent in the same occupations, we find large differences in the share of job postings that explicitly offer remote work.
To be fair on the second complaint, if the first thing your app does is display a web view of a page that requests an email address (even if just for a mailing list), I might also say a claim that it doesn't collect that information is incorrect. It's too easy to just say the site is unaffiliated because you used a different entity name for the site and circumvent their controls, and it may be unclear to people whether an email address is required for full functionality.

The alternative to marking the form to indicate they collect personal information would be to load a different web page by default that doesn't try to collect email addresses.

I underatand how when you're mad at a company it can be hard to give the benefit of a doubt about other actions and use that think about them rationally, but I think that's all that was required in the second case.
>
If modern encyclopedias are like Wikipedia, then I can see how you wouldn't find them interesting. Although Wikipedia does have interesting information within it, it's now written so verbosely that my eyes glaze over most of the time. Yeah, there's simple.wikipedia.org, but it's not nearly complete enough.

The problem with the writing
in Wikipedia articles is that they are often extremely detailed in certain aspects, because more and more people kept adding specific bits to it. But then often the overall cohesiveness of the article is lost, and it becomes hard to read.

The problem is that Wikipedia articles usually don't have single authors which would ensure the article as a whole is compelling.

There is actually an encyclopedia which does much better in this regard: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. It's a free online source, like Wikipedia, and it is limited to topics of philosophy, but it reads so much better. Even though many of its articles are quite long. Each article is written by an expert in the field. It is the encyclopedia in analytic philosophy.

One problem is that sometimes articles are slightly biased because the author has certain views, and this isn't at all obvious unless you're already an expert in this topic. Still, most articles are great.
Ok, I see, you are accusing immigration officials of breaking the law, not immigrants. I think that's a reasonable discussion to have, however:

1. The people in NYC we're discussing have not been granted asylum as far I understand, they've just applied, so we haven't even gotten to the alleged illegal activity. You certainly cannot call these people illegal immigrants.

2. Even in the worst case you're describing, an immigrant legally applies for asylum, and then is illegally granted asylum by the US government. The immigrant still has not broken any laws here and cannot be described as an illegal person. Imagine if you apply for job, receive an offer, and accept it. Later on it turns out the company was legally required to post the job in more places or something, and it shouldn't have made you an offer. Have you broken the law? Are you illegal now?
replacement for real life achievement
Also the Internet Archive.
I'm working on it right now, 45 minutes after the submission. Maybe not everywhere? Maybe fixed already?
Yes, I meant those 5 specifically.

It would be interesting if there is enough demand for a forum about a topic so that it gets 30 million users and there are absolutely no competitors on the web.
I do not know if this is or is not a joke.
I'd always assumed my cat drools when she gets a good knead on simply because she's purring so hard, but it makes sense that it's related to nursing behavior.
Visualize and Interact with Your Codebase
For example: https://tailscale.com/blog/go-linker/ talks about how they slim down the Go runtime to workaround the 15MiB memory limit for network extension.
> The flow is: I'm trying to do a thing that's only marginally related to the embedded device

It's too bad that this comment is buried so deep: it should be at top level. More and more often, embedded work is just like this -- the business logic is far more important than the fact that it's running on an "embedded device." And in those cases, having programmers who understand modern software development at a high level is far more useful than having programmers who are expert in C and comfortable sitting down with multiple chip datasheets for a week, writing peripheral drivers.
> When plugged in, it's in a very limited 5V state.

Depending on what's on the other end, it's actually even better than that would imply most of the time.

If both sides of the cable are in spec-compliant USB-C ports, then the power pins will be left at 0v for the initial connection, and only the CC pins will have a minuscule amount of power coming from the source (charger) - just enough to detect specific levels of resistance on the sink (phone/laptop/etc.) for 5v power and/or negotiate a higher voltage for USB PD.

Once they've established that one side is a source and the other side is a sink, then the source will provide power on the power pins of the cable.

If a USB-C cable is used to connect one charger to another, for example, then the negotiation will fail and neither charger will provide power on the main power pins.

USB-A ports, on the other hand, always provide 5v, so USB-A to USB-C cables always provide 5v on the main power pins.

The reason some cheep chineese electronics with USB-C connectors can only charge with USB-A to USB-C cables, not with USB-C to USB-C cables, is that they skipped the CC pins entirely. I actually modded one device by adding in two half-cent resistors to make it able to charge from a USB-C port: https://www.nfriedly.com/techblog/2021-10-10-v90-usb-c/
Sounds like that is in the cards:

>This will offer us more control over the forum's configuration and allow us to provide an experimental onion service for our users accessing the platform via the Tor network.
or mabye we should be more honest and consider that maybe this is a way for the USA government to fill its coffers back up?

(rapping on another comment saying that there's a chance this is a way for the USA government to sell the 'manufacture capacity' that 3M is to other "greener" owners)

now that I type this out, I realize that this is perfectly consistent with the behavior of empires. the realization that the alleged 'pax romana' (stability and 'peace' for the roman empire) was built on stealing from 'barbaric' tribes and selling stuff to more 'civilized' owners in Rome.
Our cat was older and once the kittens got into a phase of "play hard, play always" I think it annoyed her to the point of madness :-)
It is impossible to interact in some subreddits if you dont have xyz karma or have a # weeks old account
It's just so immaterial to US job health.

We have around the same factory employment today as in 1945. Despite growing population by more than 2X. 13M mostly non-skilled. Maybe 5%
NP, that also the reason I started the project - to reduce my time on HN posts
I don't know. I'm skeptical about lemmy taking off but for a different reason — there's a sort of chicken and egg problem with content. It's tough to attract users without attractive users. Bluesky has tried to address that with selective invites and whether or not it happens organically with lemmy who knows.

Using lemmy though, it seems a lot more intuitive to me than mastodon. I can find topic communities on other servers easily, and the community-server match issue seems like a better fit than mastodon in some ways. Mastodon never has quite clicked with me, but lemmy does, maybe even more so than reddit itself.

The limits to me using lemmy right now are content not ux. Mostly I use reddit for relatively obscure topics.

But already I'm seeing cat photos of the sort I'd see on the main page of reddit so maybe it's a time thing.
I am sure I read similar comments around 2008 - "We have phones with internet connectivity, phones with touchscreens and phones with apps. No iPhone needed".

And yet, here we are. iPhone truly revolutionized phone market and was the first real smartphone.
Your reddit data is already available via torrent, along with everyone else's, but you'll have to dig for it

Reddit comments and submissions collected by Pushshift: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36038684
1. I was being facetious. I don’t care about the use of the word “mysterious” in the title. I just wanted to insert my joke about people who are nitpicky about article titles in cases when it honestly doesn’t matter such as this one.

(Maybe facetious isn’t the right word because, again, this isn’t a serious issue. The article title is fine as-is. It’s not clickbaity in the slightest and the lede isn’t buried or insert usual explanation for nitpickiness)

2. Your suggested title is only better depending on the target audience (and if you don’t capitalize “naledi” or “sapiens” after “Homo”, ha more nitpickiness). It’s CNN, not Scientific American. Better is subjective.

TLDR: On HN, there’s too much pedantic circle-jerking going on related to fixing article titles. We get it. We’re all “smart”.

(For more context, I’ve seen so many complaints about article titles over the last few weeks. It’s ridiculous. GP’s comment that asked “which humans?” was literally the first and only comment on this post when I viewed it earlier. That’s annoying. The literal second comment was mine which basically says “stop complaining, the title is explained in the first 2 sentences of the article”.)
ATX power supplies are a much easier task. Fixed voltages for everything. A USB-PD charger capable of 240W is essentially a variable power supply from 5 to 48V. Much more difficult in execution.
With GM now on board with NACS as well, single-cable designs make a lot of sense: that single cable should just be NACS in North America. The writing is on the wall for EA to see.
https://github.com/ksurl/Shreddit

Use this one for an updated Python version. The linked repo didn't work for me.
Ah, see I think denigrating the conversation by moving to personal attacks - painting me as a child who “stomps my feet” - is far less charitable. I legitimately wanted to see the data / could be persuaded.

Aside, my personal anecdote is that this lack of decorum is why I rarely comment on HN anymore. So perhaps you are right.
I never have, but as a child I received a couple, and they're great fun. In this case my thoughts are twofold. First, it sounds like the kids are old enough to be potential users of the encyclopedia, and more importantly old enough to start choosing their own sources, and the way I remember it that's a bit past the age at which a cardboard box holds much excitement. Second, the article has a picture of the box that the encyclopedia came in, and it doesn't really look all that large to me; I've gotten larger ones than that from amazon plenty of times and I would expect the author has as well.
You cant polish a turd... Hold my beer.
Maybe something like Runpod or Vast.ai (https://llm-utils.org/List+of+non-serverless+GPU+providers), or one of the serverless things (though beware the cold start times...)
For most of its history, the Royal Mail was a public service, operating as a government department or public corporation. Following the Postal Services Act 2011, a majority of the shares in Royal Mail were floated on the London Stock Exchange in 2013. The UK government initially retained a 30% stake in Royal Mail, but sold its remaining shares in 2015, ending 499 years of state ownership [1]

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Mail
ML was written as the language used by the theorem prover LCF. It was written in Lisp.
This is definitely true. A good compromise I've found is the mod that adds volumetric fog to OpenMW. Looks absolutely stunning and retains the mystique of distance in a more immersive way.
> They aren't looking to replace Apple, they are just trying to find a way to get their revenue growing again

This is such an odd sentiment.

Meta was first in this segment, they've spent billions and billions, harmed their reputation as a company on Wall Street, etc. etc.. Apple comes in after them, with, from what we can tell, a superior product. This rationalization that this was all part of Meta's master plan all along is a little ridiculous. They're going to lose and get the crumbs, just like Android device makers get 30% of the profit (70% of it goes to Apple) but hold 80% of market shares. This wasn't Meta's aspirations and is a blunder.
Some people look up at them as heroes in the fight against "the system" (whatever that is)
Glad you're being conscencious but why would it be rude to name somebody who wants to share their amazing experience? In fact, I think in today's world or would be rude not to promote their name and story link to their video.
Interesting, I think the point about processing with GPT is important. Our thing started as naive narration but many articles are hard to follow when simply narrated.
I hear you, but those debts are actually yours. When you get treatment, you're assuming responsibility for the bill. The insurance company is technically reimbursing you, not assuming your debt.
Get a desktop computer and put a NVIDIA GPU in it. It is pricey but so are cloud instances with a GPU. Alternately, for some things the M-chips from Apple are pretty good.
I wish books didnt insult me for liking other books
> I once read an article that argued in the absence of war, it's impossible to tell if a doctrine or commander is good or not.

I would argue even more drastically that, a commander or doctrine is only as good as the war they are in. I mean that every conflict has the capacity of developing so differently that even a tested commander or strategy is suspect. Historically, conflict during a period was more homogenous. Having a war every 5 to 10 years would keep your officer corps relatively relevant. Only in large empires with a huge variety of martial interests would we see commanders succeed wildly in one engagement and utterly fail in another.

But modern wars swing suddenly from guerilla, to conventional, to insurgent, to cold with such rapidity that command experience is profoundly difficult to rely on as a predictor of success.

Probably the wisest way to promote in a modern military is to use all your standard expectations in peacetime. Who is organized, dutiful, etc. But maintain the knowledge that once shit hits the fan, you will be moving people around based largely on success. Which is what happens in real full blown conflicts. France in WWI is a good example.

The much harder question is how do you measure performance in non-conventional wars?
I have missed the data file entirely and just extracted all the entities from the rendered website, then enriched all the repositories with some extra info through the API (still ingesting some data for a few repos, hitting the API limit frequently).

The goal is to have a deeper level view of public government orgs, including a more granular view of contributors and how they interact with code.

Great idea about wikidata! That's another data rabbit-hole to climb down into.
First ever LLM with context about your entire codebase with files, dependency edges, and function level edges. No other tool has this much knowledge about your codebase with the power of visualizing the connections instead of a text-based response.
A place where nobody dared to go

The love that we came to know

They call it Xanadu

And now, open your eyes and see

What we have made is real

We are in Xanadu
My dog loves licking me. Arms, hands/finger (especially when I've just washed them and they aren't dry yet), scalp.

He also will scratch the fake tile floor in certain corner spaces like next to my front door. I think I read a while back that the scratching helps release their scent so it's like they're reclaiming their territory too. (this is after he's gone out and done his business, not him telling me he needs to go out)
The API is limited though. It cannot retrieve all historical data.
However, the person you're replying to has an account from about 5% into the lifespan of this site, so can hardly be accused of being a recent reddit migrant.
n-gate never got it wrong tho. I think the secret ingredient is contempt.
That's a pretty shitty response to an actual problem.

Companies don't need to prove the safety of things like this.

Look at bpa free. Most people don't even know that bpa free plastic tends to be just as bad, or potentially worse than bpa. The press doesn't give a shit I guess. Society went through its giant bpa panic and now it's tired of dealing with this so let's just ignore it and move onto the next thing. Ignorance is bliss.
There are millions of people all over the earth that genuinely believe "might makes right", or "greed is good", or "capitalism inherently results in meritocratic and technocratic allocation of resources so nothing that happens under capitalism can possibly be bad".

That's not even the least liberal worldviews widely held. Love thy neighbor and the golden rule and accountability are not universal
The shareholders shouldn't just get zeroed. There should be a clawback of profits made by 3M since the 1970s. Raid my 401k -- someone has to pay.
or it might just be sold as a whole to another company, or continue to exist post bankruptcy
That’s not the issue at hand. The issue is an article claiming pathogenic material was tested on people.

An article talking about the ins and outs of IRB process approval would be much more informative, or going into detail about what is and is not ethical.

False or at best misleading statements of pathogenic biological tests on people bring us no nearer to actually talking intelligently about the issues or making better decisions.
I used the world book (2021) to reduce the need for computer use in my kids. They have computers, but they are Alphamsmart Danas and they can use them to write, code in C, play chess, and read books I load on there.

The World Book has great articles and I learn plenty from it too. One unique thing is the authors of each article are listed. When I read an interesting article, I email the author and engage with them further, which often leads to more interesting insights.
In the first half of the Cold War, the US's economic superiority was far from evidently obvious. The USSR's economy was growing extremely quickly, and S curves are hard to distinguish from exponential growth. With the benefit of hindsight you're probably right, but at the time I think the posturing / arms race was the rational move for both countries.
> we realize that just about everyone has or does things that are stigmatized and we have no choice but to stop stigmatizing them

Yeah, it almost never actually works out that way, though.
> Apple's product is a productivity enhancing tool, the main use case is a mobile desk so that you can use your computer anywhere in the world and the monitor setup is always exactly the way you want.

Apple's initial use cases are around work, entertainment, and meetings. It's ridiculous to think they won't expand this and compete in every use case once they get market shares and a developer eco-system. They are not different products. That's like saying a MacBook Pro and a HP laptop are different products. No, one is a high-end, more expensive, more coveted product, and the other isn't.
for sure, it's still useful, but i think it might be worth some sort of down-weighting for trains that run less frequently.

for example, if the ratio of local:express trains is 5:1, the watershed should be more heavily influenced by what's accessible in 40 minutes via local.

this is also in part due to the way people use the subway in NY -- nobody looks at a timetable and says "i'll head down to the station to catch the 6:37 express" like you would in some cities with reliable timetables/schedules. in NY, you just go to the station and wait and hope the train you want shows up next/soon.
Thanks for flagging this! These were missing from the initial dataset I used as a starting point, but I can easily extend it myself.
Because when the grocery store employee picks the fruit for you online order they don’t care about getting the ripe ones with no blemishes.

Additionally they seem to always pick the perishables with the closest expiry date. IE milk from the front of the shelf that is expiring tomorrow rather than the stuff at the back that has 7 days before expiry.
Isn't this the problem we've been having?

"Here are the parts of a full solution, pick a favorite to the exclusion of others."

So... Probably the one that despite a specialty has the greatest strength in all the others. Certainly one who appreciates all the others as well as the other aspects you didn't mention
I just get a page not found.
Curious too (also in Thailand), currently using smartair and Ikea Starkwind for PM/VOCs.

Looking to design something more integrated with CO2, house cooling, de-humidifying aspects included (controlled by HA).

Have you entertained heat exchange systems? Thoughts on the magnitude of impact to aircon?
Huh? The point of an 'existential' trial is that it's 'existential' i.e. it threatens the existence of the business.
Are there examples of that happening?