skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://interestingengineering.com/science/chlorine-trifluor...

>

”is, of course, extremely toxic, but that’s the least of the problem. It is hypergolic with every known fuel, and so rapidly hypergolic that no ignition delay has ever been measured. It is also hypergolic with such things as cloth, wood, and test engineers, not to mention asbestos, sand, and water-with which it reacts explosively." He continues, "It can be kept in some of the ordinary structural metals-steel, copper, aluminum, etc.-because of the formation of a thin film of insoluble metal fluoride which protects the bulk of the metal, just as the invisible coat of oxide on aluminum keeps it from burning up in the atmosphere. If, however, this coat is melted or scrubbed off, and has no chance to reform, the operator is confronted with the problem of coping with a metal-fluorine fire. For dealing with this situation, I have always recommended a good pair of running shoes.”
Going into engineer-minded solution-focus mode and ignoring the meta here - Hashicorp Nomad is lightweight wrapper around docker, works just fine on a single-server, GUI or CLI at your discretion, automation options scale nicely.

Logging - look at Loki, also by Grafana Corp, will run in a container, Nomad has a docker driver extension to send logs to a Loki endpoint (podman has some sharper edges, but probably less so on a single-host setup).

EDIT: I haven't updated this in a while, but https://github.com/jedd/nomad-recipes/blob/master/loki.nomad gives a taste for a very basic Loki job under Nomad. In terms of prereqs, you'd need docker & nomad running, and have a persistent volume (to local disk) configured in Nomad.
"damning indictment"

Okay. Who out there has better vision software that can do as much as Tesla?
I think we have to stop chasing growth like this. It's destructive to many things.
> CIA World Facebook

That sent shivers down my spine, but then I realized that's just Facebook.
That example with the Chinese characters brings up a point that seems to have gotten lost or actively suppressed, likely by those with other motives: what may look "unreadable" to you may in fact be something that is perfectly normal to billions of others. Yet why are people constantly told to emphasise "readability" in the code they write, which really refers to a lowest-common-denominator dumbing down approach? Shouldn't the onus be on the reader to educate oneself sufficiently in the language to understand code that one thinks is "unreadable"? Moreover, unlike natural languages, programming languages are defined exactly and systematically, so there is no ambiguity whether a piece of code is valid or what it does.

What is "unreadable" to some could be perfectly readable to others; and what is readable to some could still be readable but unnecessarily verbose and tedious to read to others. We shouldn't let how we write code be dictated by those who barely know the language and want to drag us down to their level.
>> people were expecting high inflation to hurt stocks, or expecting rate hikes to hurt stocks

> Is any of those ideas truly conventional wisdom, or just popular culture among some social media sites?

These are absolutely conventional wisdom. It's as conventional as you can get, and the opposite of crazy ideas you see on social media.
It’s not necessary after the crash. It’s necessary for after power failure. These are not the same thing.
Real, and difficult, biological reasons why it’s hard to lose weight (2018)
Laughing my tail feathers off. This is so ridiculous it might actually be a decent idea for some specific use cases. I grew up on a small scale (high triple digit hens) chicken farm and think this could be useful for urbanites with a few birds. It could prevent them from getting through fences and protection - might also be good for aggressive roosters.

Edit: I don’t have any qualms with clipping wings but do find it sad to prevent the animal from leaving the ground.
It's more free-speech than Reddit along the political spectrum, but less free-speech than Reddit along other spectrums. We're not allowed to insult each other on this site, for example, and posts that are specifically about politics are not allowed. Even Reddit has subs for different political groups.
There are relatively few things I've read that I can definitively point to as having almost instantly changed my mind on something. This is one of them. Reading often offers a broader understanding or different perspective, but seldom a sudden flash on insight.

Others short reads that have changed my mind in that way include:

- "The Inner Ring" by CS Lewis (https://www.lewissociety.org/innerring/)

- "On Photography" by Susan Sontag (https://www.amazon.com/Photography-Susan-Sontag/dp/031242009...)

- "Black Souls in White Skins?" by Steve Biko (as far as I can see only widely available as part of the Collection "I write what I like")

- "The Two Cultures" by CP Snow (https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/students/envs_5110/snow_1...) (This one is a lot like Freeman's in that many summaries seem to completely misunderstand the argument it is making, and many people assume it says something it doesn't).

- "Ironies of Automation" by Lisanne Bainbridge (https://ckrybus.com/static/papers/Bainbridge_1983_Automatica...)

- "Risk Management in a Dynamic Society" by Jens Rasmussen (http://sunnyday.mit.edu/16.863/rasmussen-safetyscience.pdf). If you read nothing else, check out Figure 3.
Nagumo's carrier force... I would think so as there's only 4 carriers to deal with. Two BC and two CA, and they might be a problem without a subsurface weapon, but if the carriers are neutralized the air is clear.

The whole schmere? How many weapons are in the load out and how many are subsurface. There's two more BC, 3 BB, a number of CA and lots of destroyers.
Their APUs are not competitive. Somehow the 13 gen has a worse igpu than previous generations. The CPU is plenty fast, though.

Meanwhile, you can run Cyberpunk on the newest AMD APUs.
I've watched all the Aviation Disasters episodes, each one analyzes a crash. A cockpit video would have cleared up a couple of them, and would have resolved many more much quicker. For example, a video would show who was in which seat, who touched the controls, where the pilots were looking, what the pilots could see, etc.
Well, I run my own blog on Gatsby, and about once per year I have to dedicate a weekend to figure out how to make it run locally again, because the entire JS ecosystem is an unstable hellscape of ever-changing complexity that morphs from one shape to another for absolutely no reason at all.
Google has founders shares. Everyone always like to blame Wall Street. Management listens to them not because they have board seats but because they want to keep the equity based comp party going.
You have one main point that you are trying to argue for, it seems to me, and I understand what it is. In fact, our disagreement really narrows down to this:

> And I'd disagree that history is too complex to find patterns.

I think it depends on what you mean by “patterns.” if you mean patterns in the sense that physical theories detect patterns that observe formulaic relationships, then I strongly disagree. But of course human history involves human beings. We come with a fairly standard (in a statistical sense) set of equipment. Of course there will be similarities. Just not ones that can be used to generalize across all history.

However, that aside, I wanted to point out that you were actually doing three different things“ below, though arguing for one position:

> If you have all the details, you can loose the ability to use that data.

> Have you seen all of the books on WW2 or Civil War, do you need to read them all and know all details before you can make any judgments, or form any opinions.

> Do you need to know what was going through the minds of every civil war solder at Gettysburg, every movement, to know who won?

First, it’s not really clear what it means to use “data” about history. If you mean make predictions, I think you’re doomed, but that’s because the predictive enterprise itself is doomed when it comes to historical understanding.

Second, I would not consider forming a judgment or opinion about something in history to be in the same class as lumping. So that’s orthogonal to what we’re focused on here. Now, it is the case that, as you split more, dive more into details, your judgments may change. They become more refined and less certain. But part of learning history just is forming judgments about things that have happened and then refining them. The danger of lumping, of course is that you stop refining because you’re so focused on the abstract patterns you think you detect. And the real value of learning history is just in the refining!

Third, who won is a data point itself, so no, you don’t even need to know how Gettysburg unfolded at all to know who won.
I have a car but that doesn’t mean I want things built around cars. I have a car because I need it not because I want it. Having to have a car makes my life actively worse.

You’re making a significant leap by assuming that car ownership implies car support.
The parallel versioning scheme of apple clang is truly annoying, as it often interferes with feature detection macros
I’m pretty sure no one is using LIDAR for lane keep assist and auto distance adjusted cruise control. I’m not sure if my BMW i4 uses radar for distance adjusted cruise control, definitely doesn’t use it for keeping the lane.

But I wonder how often the equivalent fails for other feature equivalent systems since they are becoming very common now, surely some of them are failing. My system warns me each time not to rely on it to avoid crashes, for example. I get that Tesla gets most of the attention, especially since they also offer FSD as well, but surely there are failures from other car manufacturers that are simply not getting the same microscopic attention.
You're not wrong, but making self be the last argument would cause confusion for almost everyone coming from other languages, and for Rust it is too late to change that now. You could special case the behavior of the method call syntax to operate that way without breaking backwards compatibility (at the cost of making going back and forth between that syntax and the fully qualified call no longer being a straight forward syntactical transformation).
Arrogant bullshit, probably the worst non-spam comment I’ve seen on HN—congrats.

https://peps.python.org/pep-0671/

Truth is, early vs late binding is a tradeoff. Python picked one, but not like the other is without edge cases either.
> For instance "used that" would be phonetically similar to "used at"

It was "and use that f Guantanamo" which is not that difficult to understand if you change "f" for "the F word".
If the US company has a Canadian subsidiary, can you get into Canada to work? Same time zones and you would have time to figure out how to get into the US or remain in Canada if that's preferable. While there's a points-based system, I think Canada is more amenable to immigration that the US.
The guy might be smart and write popular textbooks, but he has not successfully managed real money over an extended period of time as far as I can tell. He "left" Guggenheim after his algos were basically found to be crossing trades with the firm, and he "left" AQR after it was determined that he essentially brought nothing new to the table.
I for one am quite happy that they're unable to make their "brand" look better.

The other day I wondered to myself what would happen if all of the secrets held by agencies like the CIA or MI6 were to be exposed, all at once. I doubt it would be bad for the likes of you or me.
I don't have the link, but Derek Lowe did a great In The Pipeline on this stuff.
The value of bread rich in fiber.
Proving my point here
Governments have a known history of both lying and deluding themselves into believing lies.
They're wrong. I was subscribed to EarthPorn before it went private. It is inaccessible to me now
Software updates.

The fact that they own the main domain and the main server means they can choose who to federate with cut off large parts of the network at a whim.

The fact they own the software means they can make it easier or harder to surprise or spread certain messages, and do so in very subtle ways.

Do not confuse open source with safe, something can be open source and be abused even if it's able to be self-hosted.
Yes, this. ^

> WebP seems to have about 10% better compression compared to libjpeg in most cases, except with 1500px images where the compression is about equal.[1]

[1] https://siipo.la/blog/is-webp-really-better-than-jpeg
Houses can't both be affordable, and a good investment.

And if I have to choose between people having a roof over their heads, and investors being happy, the latter can go pound sand any day of the week.
Mental-Health Awareness Can Be Bad for Mental Health
It thinks the south bay is a desert, my house has a flat roof and windows instead of a garage, and so do all of my neighbors. Not a bad theme, but not very accurate to present day. Still impressive.

If you zoom out enough, it goes back to OSM, so I wonder if it's doing a tile by tile conversion, but I wonder how it could be sped up.
I don’t know, it made me snicker. But then again, I do spend most of my working hours among 14 year olds.
>> it feels like some kind of state run propaganda piece, I assume to just keep a negative view on China in people’s minds.

China is a fantastic country filled with amazing people, culture, history and so on. It is quite possible to recognise a country's positive characteristics while questioning specific actions by some of the people within that country. This is as true of China as it is of any other country.
What does "start leading" even mean? Every CPU launch, AMD is ahead and the Intel beats them or Intel is ahead and then AMD beats them. There is no leading here. There are only wins for people who want CPUs that keep getting faster, cooler, require fewer watts to run, and overall improve generation upon generation.
I don't know of any site that will allow someone to set up a "secondary" API where they proxy all user requests, especially if they're using a variation of a trademark.
Let's Encrypt has an automated way for anyone who comes into possession of a private key to get the corresponding certificate revoked: https://letsencrypt.org/docs/revoking/#using-the-certificate...

I wish this were a standardized thing every CA had to have, to avoid things like this:

> As of the time of writing, that certificate is not marked as revoked
> slowly bleeding itself to death

If it’s slowly then it likely doesn’t matter in the context of going public and making a lot of cash for the investors. It’s hard to imagine that the people who are given the power to decide the fate of Reddit don’t care about its long term fate at all - but it might well be the case.
You want to take over already existing communities instead of building your own? Who is the extremist here?

Stop being lazy and put in the work, then whine about your situation. As it is you just sound like someone annoyed because things don't work the way you like but you don't want to do anything but complain.
Many of us are quitting Reddit for good on June 30 when Apollo and the other third-party apps are killed. This week's strike is just a warning shot across Reddit's bow.
We didn't see the productivity advances from the personal computer for 20 years either. It takes a very long time for people to learn how to use new tools.
That’s not what I’m asking or suggesting
Japan making efforts to bridge digital divide between young and elderly
It’s basically stuck there unless you go look up a list of caveats of what has been selectively implemented.
We haven't compared resource usage against grafana stack. Rust is a lot more efficient than Go in general though.
Have they agreed to shut down? I think this site is only displaying subreddits that have explicitly announced they're going down.
Around 15 year ago I remember Tao Lin’s failed attempt to self-promote his existence on Wikipedia. It was a spam-filled marketing blitz that went nowhere for him. He kept trying to add references to himself in all these different articles where it was 1. inappropriate and 2. completely unsourced. He would modify/vandalize something like the George Washington Bridge article and put in a sentence about how Tao Lin’s latest Work was composed while sitting under that bridge. It was so stupid and his edits didnt last 5 minutes. He didn’t seem to understand how Wikipedia worked so he created numerous sock puppets that would talk to one another and try to fake consensus about matters related to Tao Lin’s notability and relevance. Eventually the admins and check-users stepped in and revealed that all the users were coming from the same IP address in New York City.
Then Tao Lin himself came in to argue his case directly — except he verified himself to the admins from that same NYC IP address. Oops. It was such an embarrassing disaster. Since then, whenever I see Tao Lin mentioned anywhere I just assume it’s just him talking about himself again.

I don’t think that anyone organically mentions him unless he spams himself first and others comment on how he is boring/no one cares/etc. Part of me thinks that he wrote this scathing review about himself — because no one would plausibly bother writing anything about him otherwise. But that seems far-fetched. The blogger is too coherent to be Tao Lin.
Easy and obvious if you're directly selling to users. Not so easy and obvious if the App Store is a middle-man.
There are huge conflicts of interests between profitability and good business. Just listen to the podcasts on how they started Gimlet. The second season they focused on dating sites and the ones that working amazing just did not make money so they had to kill it and just do the generic shit we have now. Saying money is the root of all evil is not too far off from reality.
> I'm not somebody who can say to what extent that comparison does or doesn't make sense

It is unfortunate that you feel that way because it's not all ambiguous.

I mean for instance a German person could say "that Bismarck and Hitler were comparable in terms of their aspirations or specific actions" and they would technically be correct in a certain way (much more so than someone comparing Mao and Washington anyway). However that would be in no way a morally sensible comparison.
It wasn’t projected to recover. It was struggling. They had wayyy too many people working there.
Not quite. Fentanyl and meth existed, but they were not nearly as available.

You can see the results of this: https://nida.nih.gov/sites/default/files/images/2023-Drug-od... (from https://nida.nih.gov/research-topics/trends-statistics/overd... ).

You can see that modern fentanyl is very different from previous iterations of drugs.
> It's because he's Muslim huh?

The backhanded racism would have went: muslim + pilot = crash in building, not disappear in ocean. So clearly you're just trying to have a hot take here.

> If it really was a suicide drop into the ocean...why wait 8 hours...just...do it...

Even though someone might conclude that death is the preferable outcome for their situation, it doesn't mean that they won't experience an insane amount of anxiety and spend a long time reconsidering or even trying to talk themselves out of it just before pulling the trigger so to speak. They're humans until the end, with human reactions, you know?
The complexity of test cases can vary massively. A test case for a bug in an idempotent function is much easier to write than a test case for an obscure rendering bug in a 3d engine. Personally, I don't think it can work for this reason and because testing and (good) QA is an integral part of development. A company that outsources testing might as well outsource the whole development process.
> endless debates where we talk past each other

Ah yes.

My favourite is when I look at a system that is slow as molasses even for one user, and the predictable refrain is: “we can scale up!”

Adding more lanes to a road with a speed limit of 5 doesn’t fix the problem of each car going slowly.
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/sand-won-t-save-yo...

All posts under the "Things I Won't Work With" series:

https://www.science.org/topic/blog-category/things-i-wont-wo...
Yeah, sadly my first thought was "Intel CPUs are powered by farting now?"

Second thought was "I wonder if it reduces fan noise."
What if the police thinks someone is hacked, starts intercepting and recording their communication, and then later it turns out they were not hacked? In other words, the police could intercept anyone’s communication. Then later if the police is questioned about this, they could say, “Sorry about that. We thought you were hacked. Guess you weren’t.”
I don't see how an absolute number is reportable. The only thing that's important is crashes/driving hour and then compare it human drivers.
This was an unparalleled resource of quality succinct analysis and conversations.
Intel, just like Boeing and to a lesser extent many other F500 companies appear to be fully financialized at this point. Their executives probably wake up each day and think about how much stock to buy back and nothing else.

Do they even remember what it is the company used to do for a living?
At least enough people are not doing it that it’s still a viable strategy.
You said
> He did not claim skynet is incoming.

Here you acknowledge he did exactly that. Meaning it could be a real possibility, in two years we would lose control to AI and be zapped out of existence. That he considers it "bullish end of the spectrum" does not make it less outrageous and pure ridicule.

The most concerning of the interview, was his acknowledgment the government is preparing to force licensing.
Does the U.S. Government Want You to Believe in U.F.O.s?
I was on reddit 17 years. Needless to say, I have emotions.

Reddark, the Twitch stream, the Discord, the Lemmings instances popping up, the way people are talking about this situation. I'm so sad, and so FREAKING PROUD.
If the law passes the police will start by intercepting the traffic of all the civil rights organizations that were opposed to the law passing.
I can answer your last question. Very few reddit users (as a % of the whole) actually subscribe to advertiser-valuable subreddits. Any targeted ads on Reddit have tiny tiny inventories.

The rest of the ad inventory is more or less anonymous and gives very poor roi to spend ads against. That's why Reddit has a total revenue of like $100m vs $50b+ for facebook.
from the parent comment:

> It was later fixed for ‘cats’, but it took a while.
Would you still recommend it as a worthwhile read? (We're talking about none other than Gabriel García Márquez right?)
But that's a pointlessly inefficient way to do it - surely what you want there is to iterate and transform rather than scan through and then slice? (And don't you need to group by extended grapheme cluster rather than codepoint anyway for that to make sense?)
Can people do it better than other people?

Can you be taught to do it better?

Then it's testable. It may be quite subjective in evaluation, but it's testable.

Simply following a process is not the only thing to be learned! Computers can do that.
Yeah, this isn't anything like Digg's ending. If you think it was, you weren't there.
Oh thanks. It even says that at the top of the page. Duh.
Are they actual facts though? We know now several of the “facts” were wrong, bordering on lies.

Trust is hard to gain and very easy to lose.
So the solution to waste is... to hire a unicorn, and then make them do a substantial portion of everything, including find, train, and manage others?

Erm. Sure, good luck with that. I'll grant that it's possible, but it's not likely repeatable or predictable. You either already have it or you'll be relying on luck to find it. And then likely cause burnout.
Is this because of the elastic search license or simply the project author chose to commercialize this functionality?