skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I can see that one being pushed back, there's a lot of context for sure but the direct question is not surfaced visibly enough.

"""
I have this working no problem locally , but in production with different domains, my browser is getting the setcookie header correctly, it doesn't say it is blocked at all but the browser isn't setting the cookie.
"""

I know there's a question in there somewhere but it feels pretty much like a run on sentence and the clarity is lacking. There's something that could be wrapped up in that final paragraph that I think could make the question more direct.
A smart meter should be capable of noticing that it is being turned off and on over and over which could harm it.

My freaking standing desk has protection if I go up and down too much within a certain period of time.

Like I said, I have zero trust this meter is accurate when it doesn't even have simple protective circuitry.
Maybe karma as an indicator of text goodness isn't all it's cracked up to be
Maybe you haven't experienced the feeling of embodiment that Zuckerberg likes to go on about. You feel like your "in" the world with others, not in the solitary room of your physical world with your eyes staring at screens. I've felt embodied, but the resolution and processor speed with current tech keeps glitching me out of it. Reality doesn't have lags and glitches, so if you have them, it doesn't feel real.
Both NuBUS and VME were large. Apple was choosing a smaller form factor for their NuBUS use. The NuBUS probably was generally cheaper and faster than the VME-Bus. They were also easy to use for the end user.

The original large VME-Bus cards was problematic for end users: large, fragile, expensive, ...
zuckerborg is a dork. there is something relatable to his awkwardness. at least for me.

apple is presenting a holier than thou image. we are giving you permission to pay us $3500 for ability to send blue coloured bubble messages to your iFace from our heavenly walled garden.
Another effective method is high rates of neutering for pets. There are geographically segregated areas in the UK that can somewhat confidently say they have no strays.

It can take a while to catch a stray, plenty long enough for them to successfully breed, which just multiplies the problem!
IMO if speed is really an issue then whisper can take care of that. It's pretty good and fast.
I got the vibe they were treating it as a cool hacker tool not calling out the Flipper Zero. But I don't know what any of this is really. I'm just some guy!
Never got glasses but I still have some cardboards :-).

The data point for the discussion is that at some point they did think that this might be an interesting direction.
I alreday feel exhausted when I walk my town because there's so many information to process: front of shops, advertising, road signs, people, cars, bikes, nice buildings,... If I had to add yet antoher layer of information on top of that, it would be exhausting.

Now, if I was someone who works in construction, I'd be happy to have glasses that add the position of eletrical wire in the wall where I'm going to drill a hole :-)
Nope.

I argue bases on them but they do not matter to me.

I do not use a 3th party App. For me it makes sense. But if they lied they will hurt themselves anyway
Show HN: Rewind-UI – A ReactJS/TailwindCSS component library
I recently decided to document and open-source the component library that I've been using internally on all my react-tailwindcss projects and share it.

Rewind-UI uses only TailwindCSS classes, which can be overridden using the className prop on each component or can be fully customized using a theme provider.

It is built on top of the CVA (class-variance-authority - https://cva.style/docs) library, so if anyone needs to adjust the theme, will just need to edit the CVA files.

Furthermore it must be noted that you can add either all the style files in your tailwind.config.js file, or only those that you are going to use, so that you can avoid having a bloated css file.

You can check out the repository here: https://github.com/rewindui/rewindui

Even though it is still in beta I would love to hear your feedback on it.
> Any set of non-trivial non-standard macros is a DSL, by definition.

thats not entirely correct but even with that definition you should think about the non-standard part. guix uses standard guile syntax and has the whole guile language available to it.

anyway i think you are trying way too hard to equate nix and guile in a way thats simply doesnt click with me. maybe you invested too much time learning nix to concede that there is something better and simpler out there
Abuse of an unauthenticated device that anyone can walk by and do. Regulations are really working!
Turning on and off quickly is “abuse” now?

What if the electric operator’s software malfunctions and causes rapid power cycles to customers’ meters?

The end result would be the same, and it certainly wouldn’t be considered “abuse” then.
lots of technologies in those vision Pro are similar components as in those iphones and ipads. If you take 2 iphone 14 pro (total cost 2x$1000=$2000) you get:

- 2x OLED screens

- 2x lidar camera

- 2x truedepth camera module

- 2x4=8 RGB cameras with very high spec

- 2x A15 chip

- 2x accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, barometer, proxmity, ambient sensors

- 2x gps, wifi, bluetooth, nfc, uwb, 3g/4g/5g

- 2x flash led

- 2x batteries

- 2x stereo speakers

- 2x3=6 microphones

They already have crazy profit margin on iphones. I think if they would price it at $2500 this would make more sense.

If they would allow to run full MacOS on this thing and I could use it just as Mac Mini replacement and attach physical external display via hdmi out then I could easier stomach $3500 price.
I don’t think smartphone adoption was held back by the lack of a sufficient status symbol. Apple didn’t bring a revolutionary status symbol to market to make smartphone adoption explode. It brought a really good product that was valued because of how useful it was. Apple’s headset will take off if it proves to be actually useful, otherwise it won’t.
>Actually, the current AI situation may be even more perilous than Jurassic Park. In that film, the misguided science that brought dinosaurs back to life was at least confined to a single island and controlled by a single corporation. In our current reality, the dinosaurs are loose, and anyone who wants to can play with one.

I'm really tired of reading stuff like this above. Seriously, AI is a disruptive tech and some people will oppose any change, but this is too much. All of the "security issues" mentioned in the article are true for browser extensions,and perhaps even software in general.

Then the author talks about "copyright mess" just before describing how it is pretty much resolved in their company (copilot banned).

The only real "problem with AI" is really a "problem with cloud" or more precisely "problem with people's lack of understanding of it". Average people should be interested in finding software alternatives that don't undermine their privacy.

For example look at AI image up scaling. Every single android app other than mine sends user's images to a server somewhere. Are those images retained? Are they scanned for whatever "legal purposes" the maker deems adequate? No one knows. No one cares. Well specifically in the entire world about 90 people seem to care.

Why 90 people? Because that's how many users my android app has 6 months after release. (the app does all processing locally, free version is ad supported, paid version can be used 100% offline).
China plans new rules to regulate file sharing like Airdrop and Bluetooth
In what alternative universe?
> Why should it matter if an otherwise good answer came from an LLM?

Because good as LLMs may be at writing good answers, they're even better at writing good-looking answers. That's pretty much what they're been trained to do, and actually good answers only appear as a fortunate side effect.

Obviously, this makes moderators' jobs a lot harder. I can understand that they get frustrated. It also allows automated climbing in SO's gamified status hierarchy, which makes it even more dysfunctional and threatens those currently on top of it.

So they want to be able to ban posts for looking automated. It's just that whether you decide manually, or with an automated tool of your own, you're going to have a huge false positive rate and quite possibly unfortunate biases in it as well. (Very recently there was a paper showing how automated LM detectors were great at sussing out non-native English speakers and deciding they were bots).
The divisive debate over California's anti-caste bill
You are right. But I didn't argue from your point of view but from reddit.
Ask HN: What's your opinion on weekly 1:1s?
I am 40+ years old and have never had weekly 1:1s with my manager in my career. I think I can manage myself well enough and when I need his help or vice versa, I just schedule an hour together. What's your experience and opinions on this. I feel like I am the only one feeling like this?
So you are claiming corporations affect regulations less than users? Doesn't match what I am observing as someone literate in (at least some) norms and regulations.

What I wrote sounded more conspiratorial than I am planned, but I stand by the opinion that coperate interests are overrepresented in regulations.
You misunderstood. Such rules never apply to _those_ people's performance reviews. They are only for peons.
I will have to point out that different people have made different comments in this thread. No one mentioned Communism before, user b59831. Furthermore the OP, just pointed out that Capitalism leads to surveillance. Which is necessary in a system where the few rule over the many.

Alternatively, in a system with more democracy, like Socialism. Where there isn't vast amounts of inequality, the surveillance state would have a hard time to exists.

My response was not irrelevant as your question contained a contradiction which I pointed out.

Another thing I would like to point out, is that you are committing the "no true Scotsman"-fallacy-fallacy. The "no true Scotsman" fallacy occurs, if and only if, the other person never defines what is a true Scotsman. I can give you concrete definitions with no logical contradictions, whether or not you accept them, that's on you.

>I am aware of the difference between socialism and communism. I am aware of the many countries that have successfully organised themselves along broadly socialist lines (and I applaud them). But I think that still doesn't align with the original author's dismissive attitude as the presence, extent, and regulation of government surveillance is a topic that must still be addressed in those successful socialist countries. They still have a state that has the power to secretly surveil its citizens.

It seems like you are going by the definition of Socialism that is common in the United States. The definition that says Socialism is when the government does stuff and you probably think Scandinavian countries are Socialists. Those countries are not Socialists, they are Capitalists. There are no currently existing Socialists countries. Here the definition so you don't accuse me of being Scottish, Socialism is when the workers (not the government) own the means of production. The so-called democracy of the workplace.
> Why should it matter if an otherwise good answer came from an LLM?

I think the problem is that quite a bit of the time the answers won't be good, in addition to it being extremely easy to generate a large volume of content, which makes moderation difficult.

That's more or less what happened with Clarkesworld: https://www.npr.org/2023/02/24/1159286436/ai-chatbot-chatgpt...

> "By the time we closed on the 20th, around noon, we had received 700 legitimate submissions and 500 machine-written ones," he said.

Imagine there suddenly being 2x more content to moderate, maybe 5x or 10x. And many of the completely false answers being written in a confident tone, yet still with hallucinations like referencing methods that don't exist and so on.

That said, it's not like SO has any problem making everyone already have a hard time, with famously nitpicky moderation that scares people away.
Looking forward to a proper monad lib in Typescript!

However, I can only assume that molding/abusing types like this might have a big - if not huge - impact on compilation times...

I've created a template-like generic type that allows you compose multiple kinds and replace any property of an object with a function returning the same type as the property, and vscode has such a hard time inferring types that intellisense has become unusable in this context.

Curious to see how this will turn out.
I agree that for a single meter (which for some reason is bolted to the outside of the house), the risk of vandalism is the same, whether it is remote controlled or not. However, a vulnerable wireless (or even internet-connected) meter would allow massively scaling up the attack. Taking an entire city (or even country) off the grid by flipping all the breakers would cause some serious damage.
Porn. What you're missing is porn.

Or generally, anything that's much better experienced directly than through a screen. Think about virtually hiking Mt Everest, diving the Mariana Trench, walking on Mars, etc. The technology certainly isn't there yet, but I can imagine a future where for a majority of the population, especially those with lower income, VR provides the only affordable* escape from reality.

* In a few years obviously, $3500 is far from affordable.
Yes indeed. This is how you destroy your compressor motor.
Many people use Paypal in Germany and one uses it with the typical bank account.

> But the same publication says that only a bit over 50% of the population even own a credit card

Because many cashless transactions are done with girocards. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girocard

Germans are usually very aware of hidden costs and credit cards are usually more expensive per transaction.

Germans also usually are much less in debt than for example many US citizens - for example the University education costs much much less. Young adults have 1400 Euros (plus!) on their giro account and it is typical to pay from that account.
> Woke is a fad

I wouldn't be so sure. People's values change over time, and new taboos develop. Sometimes permanently. I don't have to name examples because they're obvious.
How do you know this about your desk?
Yeah I get it. But from someone who's sold software this way before, for paid up front to make economic sense it needs to be a quite a significant amount. Majority of people don't want to commit to this.
APL, ML and Pascal too. There is a story that Ken Iverson, the inventor of APL, was passing a terminal at which a Fortran programmer had just typed:

I = I+1

Ken paused for a moment, muttered “no it doesn’t”, and passed on.
That seems like a fair read. Maybe I would restate as:

Reddit: If we had all Apollo's users, and showed them ads, we could make $20M/year more than we are making now.

What Christian meant to say: Ok, if that's really true, how about you buy my app and all my users for $10M? Then you can show them all the ads you want. If what you say is true, that's quite a deal for you. But my real point is that I don't believe your $20M number.

What Reddit heard: If you pay me $10M, you can have my app and all my users and I will stop making a fuss. Otherwise, I will badmouth you to my users and the press, encourage boycotts, and otherwise try to force your hand.

This read mostly makes sense to me. The only part I don't get is the part of the call where Christian says:

> I said "If you want Apollo to go quiet". Like in terms of- I would say it's quite loud in terms of its API usage.

If Christian's intention was to sell the app and all its users to Reddit, then the load on the API wouldn't change, the only thing that would change is that Reddit would own it and the users would also see ads. So Apollo wouldn't "go quiet" under this scenario, and I don't understand the comment.
Actually I think this is the perfect comparison to support my point, not refute it.

China does not suffer from construction cost disease like advanced Western countries do. Their cost of labor is lower.

And even France, which doesn't have construction cost disease as bad for the US for things like transit projects, does have this problem now as they try to build Flamanville and as was seen at Olkiluoto.

My hypothesis could definitely be wrong, perhaps it's just logistics and even with our high cost of labor we could still build nuclear economically in the US. But having read everything I can get my hands on about how to improve nuclear costs in the US, I'm sticking to my hypothesis until I get data that refutes it.

And it's not an engineering problem alone, though at Vogtle it's clear that part of the problem was engineering. EPC in general was a massive fail at Vogtle. But the partial design and bad design did not help either. This was the site where EPC thought the design was unconstructable, yet still powered thought to construct something else, and then had to get this new thing approved... Everybody working on it has been gearing up to sue each other at the end rather than trying to get it built.
Show HN: Groceed – Your shopping list, modern and shareable
Are you always in a rush and never have enough time? Going grocery shopping between one commitment and another can be a hassle, with pieces of paper that get lost and messages to manage.

What if there was a simple and modern way to create and share your shopping list, without wasting time? With Groceed, it's possible! Create your shopping list in a few clicks and share it with anyone you want.

Try it now, it's worth it!
You keep saying 1 billion, but the world population is already around 8 billion.
There could be a userscript for a better reddit UI if someone cared but looks like nobody does. There's also Reddit Enhancement Suite but I don't think you can use it on mobile.
I have to keep posting this in every thread on this topic I guess. LLMs have an extremely high noise to value ratio; it is easy and quick for a user to generate an incorrect but nicely worded post and it is easy for said users to do so across multiple posts instantly. Additionally, there is no value in allowing for users to post answers by LLMs because if someone wanted that, they could've just asked the LLM themselves.

A great example of this problem is people submitting bullshit PRs to repos, which has become worse with the advent of LLM popularity [1]. This means reviewers need to spend a lot more time sussing out if it's AI generated or not which takes away time from reviewing actual, valuable PRs. Or even stuff that's bad but generated by an actual human, because there's potential for actual knowledge transfer there.

[1] https://mastodon.social/@danluu/110335983520055904
I agree with the rest of your comment, but it's framed as a retort but doesn't really work as one. The person your responding to already said "otherwise good answer" which excludes a wrong but "good-looking" one.
Sapiens according to the first sentence (i.e. “modern humans”) in the CNN article. (Although, this is what most people assume anyway when seeing the word “humans”.)

Interestingly and headline-related, the species isn’t that mysterious as the headline suggests because the second sentence of the article identifies thems as the “Homo naledi”. Insert typical rant about article titles for X reason.
> Turning on and off quickly is “abuse” now?

Yes because it's not built to be activated in that manner. Especially for high power/high voltage. This is not a mechanical keyboard switch.

> What if the electric operator’s software malfunctions and causes rapid power cycles to customers’ meters?

Then this is on the power company to fix it and fix the downstream failures this might cause. (Same as power outages that cause damages)

> it certainly wouldn’t be considered “abuse” then.

Abuse: Misuse; improper use; perversion.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/abuse#English
The brain carries state and is self-modifying, which is something that can‘t be said about mere statistical models.
Abuse or not the meter should certainly protect itself against something like you just described. Now a software fault can blow up all the customer's meters and you think that's fine and good?
You mean that stuff in redbull ;-)
"populist hot takes" haha, I'm sorry, but seeing this kind of language in a "gpt can/can't code" debate on a "hacker" forum is just funny to me
> What’s the scientific discovery in the last five years that’s responsible for medical experts saying that “men can give birth” when they didn’t before?

"Woke" people think that gender identity != sex, and the word man is (or at least, should be) a pointer to the former. "Anti-woke" or "non-woke" people believe that gender identity doesn't exist, or that gender identity == sex, and therefore the word man must be a pointer to the latter. That literally explains this entire bullshit debate that I keep having to listen to over and over again.
it really is a different thing, because it supports progressive loading (you get lo-res animation initially, and then load up more details just like with non-animated progressive image)

(unless this feature got trashed during the multi year finalisation. best technical discussion about it still seems old FLIF/FUIF posts and encode.su threads)
It comes from 20% capacity factor versus 90% capacity factor. Replacing 500 GW of nuclear will vaguely require 2,000 GW of solar.

The problem is you want to build it in the southwest of the US, and has a long ways to go to reach the rest of the US. That will be a challenge.

If you think nuclear has a load-following problem, you have no idea how big the problem for solar will be!

And cost will go down, not up when we build more. The cost is because we build them so slow and only one at a time. If we built 500 at once, cost per GW will drop dramatic. Anti-nuclear people are just being dishonest about economics. Ultimately, even if we had to spend a few trillion dollars on this, it will still save money in the long run.
I wonder if there is any relationship between HKT and C#/Rust generics, from my perspective I always see HKT as "A type that accepts types that generates another type" and generic as "A functor that accepts types that generates another type". That makes me wonder if types and functors are exchangable.
Longpress on iOS Safari gives you a menu that lets you open a link in the background, which is essentially open in a new tab. I use it all the time, e.g to work through the HN front page selecting some comment pages to read later
> Porn. What you're missing is porn.

I suppose this means that Apple is aiming for the high end of that market while Meta for the coin-operated booths? :-)
A Polish book using TI PC Scheme was my first brush with Lisps (plus awareness of AutoLISP).

I can thank opening myself to wider world of programming languages (and all my use of Lisps) to that small 1990 book.
The apartment buildings in my area all have wireless gas leak detectors, this video makes me want to take out my HackRF and start experimenting with mine.

Flipper Zero isn't what's causing this, the bad "smart" devices are, and the culprits themselves, of course. Just because you can hack a system, doesn't make it legal. Know your local laws. Mine says "accessing any IT system without authorisation is punishable with imprisonment from 3m to 3y; accessing the aforementioned system with the purpose of obtaining data is punishable with imprisonment from 6m to 5y.", vague enough for all of these things.
"A term which no one else uses."

Yet. They've set it rolling and so far own a perspective separate to AR/VR. Leaves the competition brawling over headsets for a still-to-be-defined VR concept while they pitch customers on their thing. Computing. Ties in to work. Easier to justify spending $x000.