skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> If they are more in the individuality side of thing (in contrast to hive mind), the dumbest of their lot would probably be smarter than the smartest person we can find here, probably looking at us the way we look at other intelligent species.

I feel like people in this thread don't watch enough Science Fiction. There are LOTS of situations where a species could trivially navigate the universe (Someone stole the technology and ran away with it, the people who invented the technology died a million years ago, they were gifted the technology by a superior race, or it was discovered by accident). Lots of possibilities out there.
The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, Ford Prefect is writing for a travel guide
There certainly could be. SwiftData @Models aren't subclasses of NSManagedObject, and don't have to use the Objective-C runtime for dispatch, or the KVC-style property accessors that Core Data uses.

The fact that it is built atop Core Data's persistent stores, cloud sync, etc. doesn't mean that it's a fascade in front of the Objective-C APIs.
Yes, Apple is clearly steering developers towards voice input and simple click based interfaces.

On Mice/Keyboards, I hope this supports third party VR controllers, otherwise the gaming/fitness side is really toast. That feels like a given, but considering the time it took for iOS to get Nintendo controller support, it's not unprecedented, especially given their relation with Meta.
Check this project:

https://github.com/gvanrossum/pyxl3
ChatGPT is wrong in that they do get tangled:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anyon
If you are walking and no cars are coming by when crossing the street, should you really be forced to wait for the green light?

There's no other reason for that except verifying compliance.
Cellular triangulation worked really well on the classic iPhone - if you were in a very crowded place. In more rural areas, you could be off by many kilometers. I’m not sure if they had Wi-Fi SSID location back then.
I echo the awe at the hardware and the disappointment at the paradigm. I wish the keynote had three extra demos:

- Something whimsical to inspire developers. Give me files represented as physical blocks that I can pile, or a task manager that shows processes as plants around me. Close apps by scrunching their screen like paper. A globe with my geotagged pictures.

- A game, any game. Beat Saber was the killer app for me to get my Vive, and Valve already spent tens of millions of dollars to create a triple-A VR game. Neither seem compatible with the Vision Pro input methods. Apple could at least play their strengths, like an AR hide-and-seek, or a horror game with eye tracking.

- Content creation or professional work. The last thing we need is another passive device to watch 3D TikTok. Show someone customizing their "home screen" environment to look like a fantasy potion shop; or a mechanic looking at a 20x magnified broken part; or an SRE watching their kubernetes cluster as a floating 3D graph; or a VFX artist in the scene scrubbing forward and backward to adjust an effect.

It feels like inventing the first smartphone, camera apps and all, but it doesn't make calls and the only input is tapping on icons.
It's not as good as Xcode, but you can set up a serviceable Swift dev environment on Linux with VS Code and the official Swift VS Code plugin which adds LSP and debugger support. It's easiest to set up in Ubuntu and Fedora but should be possible in in other distros.

I haven't toyed with Swift under Windows, but the devs behind Arc Browser have been hiring people to work on improving Windows tooling and writing a Swift wrapper for WinUI 3.
A few reasons they don't cover that sort of thing in articles like this imo:

1. Graphql brought back n+1 problems for many popular frameworks/languages

2. This article's goal is to convert readers into paying customers, never forget that. Engineers at shops with large scale systems and problems like what you've outlined are not who will be reading this article and are not people who would pay for appsignal. They likely have existing performance monitoring systems that are either too specific to their systems, too entrenched into their infra, or more advanced for their needs.

In the end this article is marketing, and effective marketing casts the widest net to get as many people into the funnel as possible. When you look at it that way, common scaling problems, like n+1 is going to buy more customers for the cost of this marketing campaign compared to the hyper-niche pool of shops worried about decoupling database:api 1:1 mappings
Stop being obtuse. The author's intent is clear.

What are we reading? A tweet.

What does it contain? Details.

What details? Ones that are publicly available in patents.

How have they been written? Carefully, to not leak anything.
I've been seeing this "try ChatGPT 4" advice all over HN. I am using 4, and it still hallucinates and generates quite useless code. It's only marginally better in my experience.
Who's Still Hiring?
"Manga style drawing" would be misleading since manga are drawn in black and white.
> In this case, isspace() returns true for Unicode white-space values, which includes 0x85 = NEL = Next Line, and 0xA0 = NBSP = No-Break Space.

Those aren't even unicode (utf-8) bytes for those characters. They are the iso-8859-1 bytes. (E.g. nbsp is U+00A0 which has a byte representation of 0xC2 0xA0)
A much more reality based explaination:

This is just sad. I'll lay this on you, yes there is a classified crash
retrieval program, it's a SAP. It is about retrieving crashed UAVs from
adversarial countries and has nothing to do with aliens. Don't be a sucker
folks.

https://twitter.com/JackMurphyRGR/status/1665884263865110529
One could hope they have an accessibility mode where the eye targets are larger. Or they offer a hardware controller pointer.
Is there an open software standard that different AI-specific accelerators can all use?

Is there any investment in consumer-focused AI expansion cards or devices?

What about research into memristors and things? You would think if it were feasible at all that now there would be a huge research push to make radical compute-in-memory paradigms that into real products.
Well, sure, it's possible my consciousness is one that's travelled along every single branch where the backwards-time-travel didn't happen, but that strikes me as extraordinarily unlikely if there have been even only a fifty such attempts in all human (future) history.
Taste is really a thing of habit.

Concentration depends on what you eat, and iirc you don't need that much protein anyways, if you aren't training/body building.

Tofu has about half the amount of protein per gram then ground beef, tempeh about 85%.

If you really crave protein tvp has between 50 and 70% per gram (absolute, not relative to ground beef) protein depending on the brand. You still need to hydrate it and cook it properly with a good marinade, but then it can pretty easily beat ground beef or even chicken breast in protein by weight.

For quality see the other reply.
all you had to say originally was:

"...because it's an argument in bad faith? I too don't see why drug patents are "obvious" or clear case that it is helpful enough to be in the public interest to maintain drug patents. Is there any evidence that ALL drug patents actually enter the public domain productively at their end of their expiration period?" [note the ALL]

Since you refuse to just admit you were wrong, we are done here. Go ahead and have the last word if that's important to you. I won't be replying any more.
> Doesn't this potentially open them to serious securities fraud?

Maybe they're hoping to find a private buyer for all of their equity who's willing to waive due diligence.
right.. so maybe Apple just thinks it is not good enough yet. They must be stretched on onboard compute capacity already.

And some might argue you just switch apps to find that "screen".

Personally I would put something interesting on the ceiling and look up at it.
LTM-1, an LLM with a 5M token context window
On my mobile i5 10-gen it's 23 ms.
You're not benefiting from it as much as you could be; others have mentioned scrubbing

That will read all of the data from the storage device(s) checking for coherency. In the case of redundancy (ie: RAID1) and corruption/rot, would use the other copy to make things whole

Beyond that and trim, most of what's in here is fairly specific. ie: avoiding ENOSPC or dealing with array changes

edit: I think running this more than ~monthly is overzealous... and only really meaningful if you have redundancy

If memory serves, the checksums are validated when you read things anyway - so I question doing passes too aggressively. I'll accept a bit for bitrot
Also fair points. In Bard I’ve been willing to pay that cost because exploring types that are defined by protocol was one of the motivating reasons for working on it.
Unusable. People seem to be concerned about Rust's ecosystem dying, but Swift's ecosystem is essentially Apple's system built-in libs + a handful of good open source packages. You need to do everything yourself when Apple's sys libs are not accessible.
deet already gave a comprehensive answer, but I'll add that the guts of privateGPT are pretty readable and only ~200 lines of code.

Core pieces: GPT4All (LLM interface/bindings), Chroma (vector store), HuggingFaceEmbeddings (for embeddings), and Langchain to tie everything together.

https://github.com/SamurAIGPT/privateGPT/blob/main/server/pr...
It's back up again now[0].

[0]: https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2023/10123/
This problem has such a simple solution: have the kids write some in-class essays throughout the term. Then, if cheating is suspected on a homework assignment, the teacher cross-references against the known GPT-free work to compare its quality.

It does mean that good writers may be able to get away with cheating, but then they really didn’t need the practice to begin with.
Yes, there are. Actual cryptocurrencies: BTC, ETH, XMR. They have an actual blockchain and serve a purpose. Improper cryptocurrencies are tokens built on top of actual cryptocurrencies. All those shitcoins are just tokens implemented as Ethereum Virtual Machine code.
> Why does it have to be a conspiracy?

Some of his claims, if you believe them, point towards coordinated activities.

For example, he claims that an intelligence official, who he had known and worked with for a long time and who he trusted, pulled him aside and confided in him about this project. This intelligence official mentioned a particular project name. He then claims that later a totally different intelligence agent independently confided in him the same details as well as the same project name. He claims that ultimately he was furnished documentation evidence of this project which he refuses to provide to media (due to national security issues) but which he has provided to congress.

I'm relating what he said in the interview. He could be making that all up. However, if he is relating actual events then there is a coordinated group of intelligence agents working towards the same goal.
I think it's much simpler than this. Either you're an autodidact or you're not. Children who are predisposed to teaching themselves stuff will now have more tools to help them learn what they want to learn.
Definitely less aliasing, but it looks blurrier than the baseline.
Nobody may need TikTok on their face, but that doesn’t mean many wouldn’t want it.

TikTok on your face likely has better market potential than the dreadful Horizon Worlds.
> Not for the typical black holes we observe in the universe.

Ah. Are the typical black holes too small, or too big?
Is it my impression or looking at all those irrelevant jobs, like people trying their best to... :
* Censoring Internet: claiming that, watching porn has something to do with real world threats.
* Protecting Skies: 90% of the time is waste of money, but well there is new threat the "aliens" yay... our job is not over xD

And honestly it's not that different from business made by climate change, AI threats, pandemic and so on (that I can summarize as "fear"), only that there is need more money... or the job is at risk...

P.S: I'm not thinking some of them are not real threats, just that they are abused.
In Spring 2008 I got my first iPhone as a hand me down from my brother. He didn’t like it at all, since iPhone OS 1 was very limited and went back to Windows Mobile. However, I became a very spoiled kid with access to Wikipedia at the age of 14 in a classroom, at least 3 years before smartphones became mainstream. It most certainly didn‘t improve my character to have such an expensive phone at that age.
Thanks for sharing this quote, very inspiring!
> I'm disappointed even though it's entirely predictable that VisionOS is built on the iOS/iPadOS foundation rather than OSX.

They’re the same foundation, iOS is a fork of OS X and was originally announced as such. I’d be shocked if there isn’t a well maintained internal build of iOS which keeps parity with macOS windowing etc.

The difference in restrictions between the platforms is entirely arbitrary. If this device appeals to Mac users or would-be Mac users, I’d be shocked if it doesn’t at least eventually allow a Mac-like environment.
If you delete a bunch of files it might get unbalanced? That wouldn't degrade performance though I think. Or it is one of those FS's that makes sure everything is balanced on disk anyway?
We spent some time putting together a threat-model and taxonomy of attacks paths for Passkeys in case anybody is interested: https://www.slashid.dev/blog/passkeys-security-implementatio...

Passkeys are definitely a leap forward in that we are shifting the bulk of the account takeover risk from the end users using weak passwords or clicking on phishing links to:
1) The server side implementation, including any mechanism for account recovery and support for multiple passkeys/auth factors

2) The browser enforcement checks (eg: this is what Chrome does: https://www.slashid.dev/blog/webauthn-antiphishing/)

3) The wallet/keychain/password manager holding the keys (there's a lot of variance here in terms of security guarantees, see recent password managers breaches. We wrote a bit about how Apple does it: https://www.slashid.dev/blog/passkeys-deepdive/#the-technica...)

4) The authenticator itself (again, lots of variance here)

All of which are harder to compromise vs the average end-user.

There are still scenarios where the end-user could be targeted/tricked but they are fewer and harder to pull off (to name some: malware stealing the private keys and account takeovers on the password manager).
It's no more illogical than, say, the progression of the SPX500 and Dow Jones Industrial stock market indexes between 2019-2020-2023.

"How does the market not care vis-a-vis the gruelling recent pandemic, ongoing supply shocks, mounting climate change disasters, population curve declines, military instability ....... ?"

In Bitcoin's case, it needs be remembered that:

* Bitcoin as the original (and, in some ways, least sullied) crypto asset will have the greatest resilience

* Despite these exchanges having the greatest Trade Volumes, they are each only involved with a minority of the total global assets. That is, most Bitcoin that exists, has never touched Binance. Even more, most Bitcoin that exists, existed before Binance did.

* Markets aren't that predictable - attempting to trade a market in a buy/sell manner based upon whether today is a seeming Good News Day or Bad News Day ... well, if it was that easy, we'd all be doing it trivially

* The previous point is also adjunct to the fact that, for example, "obvious selling time" is most often leapt upon (with leverage) by amateur traders - whom the market then liquidates with a sudden contrary movement. A cynical manipulation certainly not unique to crypto markets, but yes absolutely ripe for them.
Unfortunately, not all locale-dependent functions have an *_l version, at least on some platforms. glibc doesn't have sprintf_l, for example, unlike BSD and MSVCRT.
Using cryptographic signatures and distributed systems theory to authenticate asset transfers is against natural law. It's in Leviticus.
30 and 40B parameter models regularly crush GPT-3 175B (Davinci) on every benchmark. GPT-3.5 is probably a 13B parameter model and it beats the original GPT-3 175B on most benchmarks (but not the more recent finetunes like 175B Davinci-003), so hyperparameters are clearly very important.
Unless you just woke up from a deep coma and think "Crypto" in this case means "Cryptography" and not "Cryptocurrency"... I don't know what to tell you.
> Wholesale and retail. We recommend a ban on the sale of live decapod crustaceans to untrained, non-expert handlers. For example, live decapod crustaceans can be ordered from online retailers. This practice inherently creates a risk of poor handling and inappropriate storage and slaughter methods. Ending this practice would be an effective intervention to improve the welfare of decapods.

Hmm, not a fan of this reasoning. The solution is to improve regulation of wholesale and retail, and educate consumers how to store and slaughter a crab or lobster. The same page even lists multiple ways to slaughter crustaceans, none of which require a high level of expertise and so requiring a ban on the practice is just excessive.
Being naturalized one can forgive your bias. But this "the best civ on earth" seems just taken straight out of a 1990-2000s movie.
> In the linked video the questioner is asking about about potential future cases/decisions and one reason not to comment on specific cases/decisions, as is what happened in the video[0], is that an agency does not want to telegraph their moves ahead of time, since that would give potential criminals a heads up that they are on a deadline and need to focus on cover up their crimes.

That's putting the cart before the horse. Catching criminals is supposed to be a means to an end; compliance with the law is supposed to be the end, and getting people to voluntarily stop doing crimes is a win. "We can't tell people what the law is because then they might stop breaking it" is absurd policy.

> If the questioner needs insight into how policing actions are decided they can ask about pervious cases/decisions and the reasoning that went into those pervious cases/decisions.

The whole reason people are arguing about this stuff is that there are no clear precedents (or there are multiple contradictory ones); crypto is similar to a lot of things but not exactly the same as any of them.
You have to use a useRef then inside your useEffect of [] you check if it is false and it it is you set it to true then run your code.

If anyone reads this and I am wrong please comment, but from what I can see that's the only solution.
His comments on anchoring virtual tools in physical space reminds me of the work Microsoft was doing with Hololens and Windows Mixed Reality. If I recall correctly, there were APIs for anchoring things in space.
They were trained by people who agreed to do a job in exchange for payment.
Old Maxtor campus in Milpitas was supposed to look like an HDD https://goo.gl/maps/JbRWqZseAVL14n167
I suspect time-travelling and Shakespeare is a whole sub-genre, the one I know is one where Shakespeare travelled forward in time and enrolled in a university Shakespeare course - which he then failed...
There must be at least one where all his works were actually sent back in time for him to copy from, leading to all sorts of questions as to who originally wrote them.
Intuit Mint is not much different. Mint was forced by some banks to not use customer credentials, and instead request an OAuth token from the customer to allow read-only access. So Plaid/Mint have the tech, they just don't do it because of adoption issues at other banks.
> TS is a joke

I'll discuss facts

> tsc is the only compiler I've had to step through with a debugger multiple times.

99.9% of Typescript developers never ever had to do that. Sounds like a "you" problem

> No DS/ML researcher wants to deal with VM args just to use more than 1GB of memory. That alone would cause so much frustration.

You're talking about NodeJS, which is just one of the many JS engines. It's also 200% easier to start NodeJS with a flag to increase the (sane) default memory limit, as compared to the insanity of setting up a Python environment.

> Not to mention unpredictable generational GC.

Is Python GC better? Really? The good thing with Python is that the whole language is so slow that GC is just a drop in the bucket. On the other hand, Millions (Billions?) have been spent optimizing JS engines and it shows. Also: GIL.

> Or the crazy crap people do with the type system (what you call better other people call a mess).

I don't know what you're talking about, TypeScript go Brrr and I get magnificent Intellisense and subtle type checking, while MyPy and friends keeps crapping their pants

> At least Python has some semblance of runtime type safety.

No. And critically it has no semblance of comp time type safety either.
Students falsely accused by the software ought to file small claims defamation suits in their local courthouses.

That kind of decentralized legal action would get costly for TurnItIn very quickly.
That's one example of how life is formed. By someone's definition on wiki, life could be defined as

> self-sustained chemical system capable of undergoing Darwinian evolution

Meaning in a different environments with different moons, stars, temperatures, as long as the environment could support abiogenesis (could be different from what we currently know), life would be able to be sustained but it might be a hell of a lot different.

I don't really know what I'm talking about but surely a different life form would've existed at some point somewhere... Right?
You can list features all day and not convince me of the existence of applications.

Privacy that is obtained by obscuring signatories or blending assets is just laundering.
Haaa, i see what you did there
it's messy! but we've got all sorts of fun stuff + a 3D printer. We also have all these shelves around the office for storing devices. Here's one: https://imgur.com/a/UGhCIxg

We're in the SF Mission. You're more than welcome to swing by for lunch/coffee to check it out.

ps: PrintNanny looks awesome!
The Arctic Will Have Ice-Free Summers as Soon as the 2030s
https://archive.is/sylks
That is possible, but I believe it is more likely that it's been removed/commented out due to IP issues.
Also it’s locked to Siri which is dogshit and falling further behind by the second. Apples speech to text is atrocious, the OpenAI tools blow it out of the water, as does Google’s.

No matter how fancy the visuals, it’s hard to have a pseudo-hands free voice interface that doesn’t uh, work?
Of course. Only Adsense is authorized. After a short investigation, it appears that the main reason these NSFW-limit ads are shown is because the article includes direct link to the PixLab NSFW API Endpoint (https://pixlab.io/cmd?id=nsfw) which is basically a bridge to our ML model that let you detect whether an image or video frame contains adult, bloody or gore content.
'Ducking hell' to disappear from Apple autocorrect
Oh I definitely do anyways, though I don't work in a typical programmer job.
> Rust kicks the bucket,

Sorry, what?
Got it, yes-- I definitely agree that a sensation can be cross-triggered by conditions other than the evolutionary pressure conditions.

Is there a "dangerous heat" environmental candidate for lobsters that we can speculate could be sensory-cross-triggered by boiling water? Underwater lava?
You say that like Fiat money isn't as well :-P
Neither of them really have HDs, rather SSDs, but more importantly the memory numbers are not directly comparable because macOS has a memory compressor. Which matters a very large amount for many workloads.