skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Cool, the state can still kick in your door or shut off your ISP or shut off your cross-border financing at the ISP or..

Or use a drone, hence why that's clearly not sufficient technology to undermine the Illuminati or whoever it is that's supposed to benefit from suppressing space magic rapid transit.
If it comes with Apple's usual 14 day no questions asked money-back guarantee, I will absolutely try it. If I can comfortably code in it for a workday instead of external monitors, I will definitely keep it.
Ok, but Lisp doesn't force you to curate a library of words or require dealing with abstractions.

Maybe this example is relevant. Racket defines procedures `filter` and `map` for `list`. Also provided is `filter-map`, which I assume may satisfy your not-being-direct-expression concern about Lisp. But, `filter-map` exists for a particular reason:

> Like (map proc lst ...), except that, if proc returns #false, that element is omitted from the resulting list. In other words, filter-map is equivalent to (filter (lambda (x) x) (map proc lst ...)), but more efficient, because filter-map avoids building the intermediate list.

So it exists for performance concerns. It also exists in the "Additional List Functions and Synonyms" so it's not like it's being confused for a core, important function like `filter` or `map`. I still write Racket code where I just explicitly have something like:

(~>
(filter (lambda (x) (equal? 'some-value x)) some-list)
(map (lambda (x) (symbol->string x)) _))

without always jumping for a more concise abstraction.

And, coming from other languages, DRY (don't repeat yourself) seems quite popular, so I am not sold on this being a Lisp-specific issue.
To be clear, is this a description of your experience with Asahi Linux?
...commenting innocuously on a massive social network among college-age North American kids in 2023
I got his point and still downvoted for derailing the thread.
That is inaccurate given that the modality for improving a model clearly fulfills criterion #7.

The legal draft did not in any way either specify an AUTONOMOUS process, nor did it even specify any type of localized "learning" in terms of memory aggregation.

A discerning reader might notice that this begins to wade into very challenging philosophical questions.

Ding, ding, ding! You figured it out!
Yeah, a reasonable discussion includes both benefits (your experience) and risks (mine). The former has recently been getting all the air time.

This isn’t a “both sides” argument wherein some highly unlikely hypothetical is trotted out to debate the consensus. Plenty of people have had bad experiences with long term ill effects.
This reminds me of the "Liar, Lunatic, or Lord" argument that religious people use regarding Jesus. Let's not railroad the options, here. There's room for nuance (like combinations or, frankly, just misunderstandings).
Because you can't opt out.

Lenders want to know about bad financial behaviors (indicators someone might not be trustworthy) to avoid a "market for lemons"[1] problem. So, they contract with these rating agencies to provide extra information about potential borrowers. Where do these agencies get their data? Lenders in turn must report the credit lines they issue, usage, defaults, etc. So, when you are borrowing, the bank can know how you use (or abuse) credit, in addition to things that you provide such as earnings and savings.

A couple of things to note. There is a difference between credit scores and credit reports[2]. Different types of credit lines may focus on different aspects of your credit report or use a different credit report [Only source I have for this was a forum I attended where a local bank had a loan officer talk about their side of issuing credit].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Market_for_Lemons
[2] https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-the-differe...
I'd even say that the social networks are a precursor to this. Everyone is constantly observed by everyone else there, and many use a fake persona to try to "fit in", or god forbid say something they will regret later. And those aren't on them have trouble keeping in touch with the rest. Smh
The demise of the suit is yet another contributing factor to the perpetual infantilization of the millenial.
Thanks for saying this. It is getting ridiculous.

Apple saying they are doing AR which does not mean anything. If you use the headset as a big "projected computer screen" I doubt people really care if the actual surrounding is there or if that makes any difference.
> fuck you David Lynch for supressing FF and and rewind on his DVDs

Made me think, do artists have the right to limit the way their art is seen? I can imagine if an artist was doing an exhibition and didn't think the museum was doing their work justice (bad lighting/space wrong), they would refuse.

I've noticed when going to music concerts a great deal of people record the whole show via their phones and don't sit back and enjoy the live experience.

Sure, they can do what they want, but I doubt I would take their review of the concert seriously.

Back in the day, music albums were choreographed and it was always a pleasure listening to it without interruption or distractions. Yeah people would sit in their sofas w/o their phones and listen to whole albums of Pink Floyd!

Enter Apple/Spotify. I'm not sure if that happens to the same extent anymore. I think we lost something there. Disabling FF/Rewind is a bit draconian however.
Wow, amazing. I always thought that was just to hide this preview. Thanks a million, anonymous HN commenter!
> People lie to Congress all the time without any consequences.

Examples?
> I have to agree with GP, I am part of several subreddits where the moderators clearly enjoy being kings of their precious little fiefdom.

You never used IRC, have you?
It’s a federated system without any of the affordances that would make it usable (or particularly interesting to me). Literally load balancing by going to a long list of alternate instances.
The sites own documentation just says, find one that works, and if that shits the bed find another. This is a UX agreeable to a very tiny and idiosyncratic group (as evidenced by Mastodon once the Elon is evil hype died.

Yes of course in theory you can beef up any instance, and shard, and add a caching and queueing layer while you’re at it. And tada you’ve just redid Reddit.
This is an amazingly beautiful hack. I'm kind of surprised we never saw something like this done by hand before the advent of SD -- plenty of QR code art, but none of it like this. I'm impressed.
My iPad Pro also has an M2 inside of it but it’s still on the iPhone model of software distribution (which sucks).

That said I’m hoping for something closer to the Mac in terms of software. Basically I want Emacs on the headset and no policies or DRM that violates the GPL to tell me otherwise.
You beat me to it!

Lobsters liberated by Manfred!

---------------

Donna beams at them enthusiastically. "Fascinating!" she enthuses. "Tell me, what are these lobsters you think are important?"

"They're Amber's friends," Ang explains. "Years ago, Amber's father did a deal with them. They were the first uploads, you know? Hybridized spiny lobster neural tissue and a heuristic API and some random mess of backward-chaining expert systems. They got out of their lab and into the Net and Manfred brokered a deal to set them free, in return for their help running a Franklin orbital factory. This was way back in the early days before they figured out how to do self-assembly properly. Anyway, the lobsters insisted – part of their contract – that Bob Franklin pay to have the deep-space tracking network beam them out into interstellar space. They wanted to emigrate, and looking at what's happened to the solar system since then, who can blame them?"
If you follow Hector Martin the lead Asahi dev he's encountered a number of bugs and race conditions in ARM linux systems which were never previously exposed because there weren't blazing fast ARM chips out there that could trigger them.
If a alien UFO can cross the galaxy, why can’t they cruise above the earths surface without crashing?
The initial, ready-on-release apps are largely going to be from companies or developers with enough clout to have early hardware access, probably in a secret room hidden in the depths of Apple HQ.
Boat shoes are a good casual alternative to loafers, I wear mine practically any time I'm out of the house for less than an hour.
The further we get away from medieval shit like buttons and ties, the better. It's absurd to have ritual attire in an enlightened society, imo, and for it to be so anachronistic (and gendered) adds to the absurdity. Congresswomen get to wear these colorful and streamlined Star Trek getups, but all the men have to be in suits and ties. Nice.
Show HN: AI-powered Google Slide decks
Already covered by existing legislation.
Yes, I think a reasonable position would be that if you perform staking by self-hosting then you're providing a service. An example is getting paid for running a machine on the Ethereum network.

If you pay money in now and get more money out later, and someone else runs the machines, then it's just a loan.

Then there's a question of where to draw the line with cloud hosting, and I have no opinion about that. Someone will sell a service that's barely on the right side of that line, wherever it is.
Hi Sammy here, one of the Daft maintainers. Happy to answer any questions that you all might have!
If you make an offline first web app you need to spend most of your time worrying about sync and auth. Otherwise the semantics of your app are going to be... iffy.
Another way of saying "inventing hardships" is "raising the bar". People who struggle to find food might do all kinds of horrible things in order to survive - for example at the expense of other humans competing for the same food. When it becomes easier to source food, they can raise their moral standards. Do you think that's some kind of fallacy? That the standard should be the same, no matter how hard it is to source food (or, in the context of this discussion, alternative foods)?
The law covers all vertebrates, I believe these three are noteworthy for being the only invertebrates covered.
Thank you ! That's the main feedback I've had about the landing page.
I wanted to make it clear, but as non-technical as possible to convey the value proposition and avoid scaring decision-makers away. But I missed my target: reading it now, I realise that it is too abstract, and it makes it unclear what exactly SQLPage does.

I'll work on it.
We have cosmical background events which cannot be shielded 100% and also cannot be predicted. This (among thousands of other reasons) means that you can never prove 100% what any given program will do on a computer.

Indeed, it's impossible to prove absolutely any fact about a real physical system. You prove things about abstract mathematical objects. Such a proof may be useful in practice when the assumptions you made for the proof are satisfied to a sufficient degree in a sufficient number of cases. Whether this is the case or not is ultimately a matter of judgement (and data, for which you have to use judgement in collecting/interpreting it, and data, for which...)

By the way, the paper you're using to write proofs in mathematical logic is a physical system.
For implications in python, see for example:

https://docs.python.org/3/library/re.html#re.LOCALE
I’m not mistaking myself for the general consumer. I’m aware that it’s only one day after the keynote, and very few people are already thinking this far into how it might affect their lives, and I know this is because I have industry experience going back decades.

That said, this doesn’t matter. If the use cases I’m thinking of are actually served by the device, then that knowledge will spread organically, and people will buy it.

I agree that movie screen in a headset is not the play, that’s why it wasn’t my first example. My point is that if just a couple of the use cases are real, it will enable people to use their space differently, and that will be about as sticky as a product gets.
see

>comparing two runners in a race where one of them shot the other with a gun

The old world settled in north america, and plundered in south america.
Can do that with a tube filled with any of a wide range of fuels and oxidisers, too.
Seems like Apple got a bit more web friendly recently (esp. seeing web browsing demoed in Vision Pro)
I still want to see more details. That being said, extremely positive news. Vendor lock-in is one of the biggest issues with passkeys and one of the biggest reasons I haven't been able to get on board with them and why I usually end up advocating against them whenever they come up.

Between this and Apple blocking attestation efforts for mobile passkeys, it gives me more confidence that this could turn into a standard that I want to use. I criticize the passkey standard pretty consistently, I would be very happy to eat crow on that.

I will say that it would go a long way to make this stuff part of the standard, I don't like how much these really critical pieces of passkey functionality are boiling down to "wait and see what vendors do." But I'm cautiously optimistic to see where things go. It is a really big deal for Apple to support 3rd-party providers and an even bigger deal for Apple to support sync with 3rd-party providers.
For anyone coming across this later, here's what happened a day after BTCUSD moved "down sharply":

https://i.imgur.com/GSFU7Mu.png

Just your average market fluctuation, or at worst an overreaction and immediate correction. It's best not to try to predict long term market cycles from the 1h candles.
'Typo' briefly makes man 'Finland's biggest earner' at 133.7 million euro (2022)
Thanks for the genuine answer.
They were trained by cheap labor in African countries, using abusive practices with no consideration for ethical concerns. The worst part is they didn't even care about how this would be seen by the public, since the public is just so blindingly hyped on it.
Thank you ! If you've built something with it, I'd love to get your feedback, and see your pain points.
You can disagree with the findings, but why do you think attempting to understand the difference between sentience and evolutionarily habituated survival instincts is "silly"?

Isn't it our job as a sentient, evolved species, to ensure we do no harm to other sentient species?

And the only way we can begin to consider doing that is if we figure out a way to classify them?
What's old is new again. This is basically an updated arm version of the itanium based SGI Altix.

Keep in mind unified does not mean uniform, the ram is distributed across all the GPUs.
That is fair, your post left it a bit ambiguous if you meant better in reference to GPT-4 or not.

Competitors aren't even at GPT 3.5.
How long are you gonna bury your head in the sand? There are millions of ways to buy actual things with Bitcoin.
If you upgrade to a Jetson you get GPU power and you can keep the form factor, win - win.
The thing that made the lightbulb go off in my head w.r.t. mainframes was understanding that mainframe I/O channels are computers. The mainframe had several dedicated computers that each specifically handled I/O to a terminal, printer, disk or tape drive, punchcard reader, etc. Made I/O programming a breeze, as you just had to tell the channel to read or write, specifying a block of memory to use as a buffer, and the channel would DMA out the data to be written, or DMA in read-in data.

It also explains the reason why despite having middling CPU power, mainframes had a reputation for stinkloads of I/O bandwidth so they could process everyone's credit card transactions, airline bookings, and that: the mainframe's CPU was involved very little in I/O, that was all handled by the channel processors!
The "elite" in many cases aren't part of the ruling class due to some intrinsic greatness, but because they were usually born into it.
The short argument is so silly. Plenty of people were 100% right about what was coming in 08. 99% of them would've gone broke shorting it. Knowing it's fucked it's the same as knowing WHEN it will fall and having the money to hang in there while you get ripped apart as everyone pretends otherwise.
> Um, I don’t think I was advocating any particular level of moderation, was I? More like visibility into its processes amd motivations, and that providing those convincingly and to an appropriate extent is the moderators’ responsibility.

If you are not advocating for a particular type of moderation then why are you all bothered about how any type of moderation is applied? What would be the point of your suggestion?
Somebody on twitter pointed out that twitches own example of an overlay that is 3% of the screen, seems like it may exceed 3% of the example image, not by a whole lot, perhaps it is 3.5% or so, but still... Be interesting to segment and measure.

Like honestly, I feel like most people have trouble conceptually 3% of the area of the screen. Like I see a stream with a sponsor logo over a small portion, and without literally counting pixels, knowing is something is 3% or 5% does not seem easy.
Official Microsoft C# VSCode Extension
Alot of companies seem to be having money issues now that they're not being bankrolled by infinite loans, such as Reddit
Sharding, caching and queuing doesn't break federation. That's not a core flaw.

As the ecosystem grows, a shortlist of popular, robust, federated instances will crop up for people who just don't want to bother.

Again, if you have any core flaws, I'm all ears.
Remember all the mockery when Apple released the iPad?
Nor credit card rewards.
Mostly comparing it to REST. The main turn off for me personally is it really seems like you have to reinvent the wheel to get caching to work correctly with GraphQL for non trivial use cases. Not saying that it works perfectly out of the box if you choose REST instead, but you can get pretty far without needing to optimize anything.

Why do you prefer auto-generated GraphQL clients?
Those bases are there now mostly to be there in the future.

The US wants a large military airport, hospital, warehouses and supporting infrastructure at a location where it can be trusted to remain there for twenty years or more, because building such things takes time. There aren't a lot of suitable locations within, say, three hours of flying time from the present facilities. So they're going to stay.
Getting Through Your Day
While there are clear benefits to electric cars (for instance, their efficiency in converting electric energy to motion), how would someone in the same article claim how battery production will only go down in CO2 footprint and cost, while claiming hydrogen and synfuels are too expensive right now?

Don't the same economies of scale apply to them: if they have clear benefits, investing in the tech to produce them will drive the prices down. People were saying the same things about lithium batteries and electric vehicles 10-15 years ago, and yet here we are today.

There might be other reasons why hydrogen and synfuels are not viable, but this article does not touch on those, and gives off an emotional + unsubstantiated vibe.

My take is that those doing a couple thousand miles per year will be perfectly well served with their existing gasoline powered cars without even affecting the environment much. Urban driving will likely need to move to small electric cars to ensure livable atmosphere in cities (where there is no good enough public transport), and the remaining driving will switch to electric (large mileage users like commercial and long commuters) for cost purposes. Of course, there will be a niche for internal combustion car fans too, but that will similarly not affect ecological footprint much (there is not a lot of driving producing exhaust gases there).
> Makes me really doubt their competence as an educator and an academic.

Lol, happens everywhere, power of memes and all that. Only difference is you know more about ChatGPT than them.
>but then again I'm sure there's a long lineup of people willing to moderate any of the bigger subreddits for free if push came to shove.

I highly doubt that there's a long lineup of people willing to do unfulfilling work for free with little recognition.
Have you looked at nextdoor or fb groups lately? They look the same
Well, Intel eventually paid for it (a $2.1 billion judgment settled for an undisclosed sum). Without a patent system, they would have just gotten away with ripping these guys off for free.
SpQR: Near-Lossless LLM Weight Compression
Here's a benchmark from the author of the mold linker:

https://twitter.com/nabbisen/status/1665936938837344256

> I installed Xcode 15 Beta to try out the new Apple's linker. It seems that my mold/sold linker is still a bit faster than theirs, but the gap has now reduced to ~60% when linking the sold linker itself on my Mac Studio. Apple's new linker is in the same league as mine. Great job!
I mean personally I have almost never used twitter and I wish it'd burn to the ground just on the principle that it creates trash content and arguments by design.

Still, for all the fire and brimstone predicted (and I was one of them) it's running, and probably capable of running at a loss for quite some time.
Another option is descretion. Why say anything at all? Especially knowing that it'll just keep the slap fight going?
And the iPod, and the iPhone, and...when has a new Apple product not been mocked?
Deadly bacteria that kills up to 50% of patients now endemic to US gulf coast
Can you elaborate how you “know” this? Or why you think it? It just looks like you’re triggered.
For a certain class of things, this could work.

You'd have to conscious of this.

It's defiantly not a "write a usual React app, but in Python"...every dropdown, menu, modal, etc interaction interaction is a backend call.
I don’t think its CUDA. If it was CUDA people would use AMDs Radeon Open Compute and save tons of money on cards with more memory.

The issue is that the Radeon platform isn’t well developed, and AMD is charging as much as they can get for their cards just like Nvidia. if they had working competitive compute they’d also charge as much as Nvidia, and make more money on fewer cards sold.

I think there’s just something with card architecture that makes it not as good as Nvidia for this purpose. Just like mining bitcoins or VR, sometimes card architecture makes a difference.
Not quite, having a list of lines it appears in won't be as helpful as the UML-ish graph.
What turned out to be the reason for the crashes in production?
War Pigs by Black Sabbath, but every lyric is an AI generated image
The great philosopher Kurt Cobain once said "It's OK to eat fish because they don't have any feelings"
It's not just that the edges of the screen are too far, it's that they're at an oblique viewing angle instead of perpendicular to the eye.
They are trained using input from an army of underpaid "ghost workers", i.e. people without many rights or economic freedom, and no consideration for their well-being.

Nothing good can be grown on such ground.