skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Your last three examples are syntactically invalid Rust. It should be more like:

<'_>
#[foo]
stuff::thing::blah
match gloop(gloop) { x @ _ => x }
if fizz { |buzz| Some(buzz) } else { |_| None }
Meh => |wtf| ()
A 14-year-old came to animate a scene in ‘Across the Spider-Verse’
The political reality of Germany is still that of climate change denial. Worse, environmentalists are effectively part of that group.

Eventually, this will change. You cannot denial reality forever, and especially not of existential problems.
Is this a fork of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandler_(software) ? (If not, pretty confusing to have two apps that do similar things with the same name.)
I had the luck (or not) to live in many places in Europe, US, Asia, and in every single place I had the need to use a car I felt so miserable.

For me not having to use a car === dramatic increase of quality of life.
You don't need stable syscalls. Instead of exposing libc as a dynamic library with a questionable ABI, make a stable ABI and expose interface files that contain function names and parameters. You can easily parse these files and generate code for any language to interface with the system.

You can do this with syscalls, you can do this with dynamic libraries, or you can do it with IPC. The point is that it's completely language agnostic and not a pain to parse and use.
See your previous comment about carbon neutrality of that biomass, except less methane is produced through burning, which also produces long lasting char... Are you commenting in good faith?
A recurring calendar invite can increase the frequency of good types of meetings too :)
Or do what I do: rent a car. Not owning a car does not mean never driving one.
Please don't ask me to sign in when I have, even after your comment here, only the vaguest idea of what it offers. Sorry.
Yes we are working on it already. But it's no trivial task so it'll take a bit of time.
Sorry already in a meeting, can we chat here?
It is chatGPT but using information from searches to answer your questions.
I feel like I'm talking to kids who have never used anything that came before react in this thread.
> Well, to be fair, I think the vast majority of developers using Rust do not care about linking to libc or handling allocation errors and actually prefer things this way.

I’d say it’s about the deceptive marketing. Rust is talked about as a safe systems language. I don’t think I’ve ever seen it followed by a disclaimer that this only applies to systems with unlimited memory.

It doesn’t of course stop at the marketing slogan. Problems like these aren’t sufficiently promoted in the documentation either.

I think that being more open about these problems would help enable a solution.
If Bitcoin looks like a security, acts like a security, trades like a security, is used by almost everyone as a security, then why are we pretending that it shouldn't be regulated like a security?
Here's one in 228 lines with an additional 190 to support hidden <selects> https://yourlabs.io/oss/autocomplete-light/-/blob/master/aut...
It's a trivial web component in vanilla js, it's tested in python: https://yourlabs.io/oss/autocomplete-light/-/blob/master/tes...
Chandler is a codename. We'll keep Monica for as long as people will want the tool.
It is a temp name. It will become Monica ones ready for prod.
> Of course the study of celestial movements eventually became astronomy

Astrology is not "the study of celestial movements". It's the utterly baseless claim that those movements have a high-level influence on human lives. That's not proto-science, it's pseudoscience. And it's not at all comparable to incorrect theories in other fields (like phlogiston or the luminiferous aether). There is no reason to expect that astrology works, and its claims are made without any supporting evidence. That has nothing to do with science.
Plowing absolutely releases carbon, particularly as a source of methane.
> "... or if you have kids giving up your car is enormously inconvenient."

> "Yes, you can teach your kids to ride, but cycling is still much more dangerous than driving."

> "Yes, you can rent a car or get an uber as needed, but it’s far more convenient to just jump in one’s own car."

> "Yes, you can prepare for really cold or precipitous weather to a degree, but it’s way more convenient to simply not have to monitor the weather all the time and tote around your extra cycling clothes."

> "And there’s really nothing you can do about hot weather unless your destination has a shower or you can otherwise make do with being sweaty."

> "The best I can realistically do is family car + bike."

I don't think I've ever seen or heard anyone before portraying the weather and transporting oneself without a car as such an ordeal and struggle. Though, if you life well outside the city I can understand the position.

When I grew up (in what was then a ~230k pop. city) only one single kid in my class had parents that cared about having a car, and all of us managed just fine getting to and from school, friends and various activities by foot, bicycle and public transport. We survived, and we turned out OK - perhaps more than OK, with a bit of the fortitude of not expecting or requiring constant conveniences or suffering the perspective that any transport without car is "enormously inconvenient".
This needs to be relearned both in person and online.

Poor planning on someone else’s part shouldn’t make an emergency on your part.
Comment in question: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-703-making-the-global-inter...

> Without specific concerns or a clear bar for acceptance, I (and my funding organization) will have to treat the current decision-in-limbo as a “no” and will be unable to pursue the PEP further.

Hynek Schlawack - Creator of attrs library - has a really good thread arguing that the current process is going to lead to this being abandoned: https://fosstodon.org/@hynek@mastodon.social/110490910474469...

IMHO this is a real shame if it is abandoned, Sam's work is incredible and the community should be jumping through hoops to try and find a way forward. The lack of motivation from some of the core Python developers to try and find solutions to the concerns is a real shame.
BTW, one of the benefits of a functional, socially mixed public transport system is being confronted with a diverse population, which helps with not becoming trapped in a bubble. (Which may be exactly the "failure" according to M. Thatcher.)
An org can find ways to ensure juniors don't stay blocked while also ensuring that seniors can keep in flow state for long, uninterrupted periods.

Prioritize docs and tests. Teach juniors how to use docs and tests. Spread knowledge and mentorship around enough that a question on the team channel gets an answer from someone who is available.

All of these things have other major benefits in addition to restoring flow state for seniors—juniors learn faster, your tests are more comprehensive, seniors can basically onboard themselves, your bus factor goes way up. "Stick everyone in the same room" is just a local maximum, not peak productivity.
The Right Way to Use Java.security.SecureRandom
> Had a 4 hour call to fix a bug , 1 on 1, never got distracted, no one butted in, no one asked to go out for lunch, coffee, had some bs made up management emergency that required everyone.

You had a 4 hour call and didn't take a single break for lunch or coffee or even just to stand up and stretch legs?
I think you and OP are talking past each other. A purely proportional voting system is not a good idea for the reasons you mentioned. That's why a lot of countries including the US have a bicameral system: One where regions/states are represented proportionally and one where seats are distributed equally.

I believe OPs critic is wrt the district based voting system of the House of Representatives. Having a winner takes it all system per district seat is a really bad idea and just a result of a limited understanding of election dynamics at that time and some restrictions how election results could be communicated before the advent of telegraphy:

A proportional system forces states to first collect all votes from all districts (a huge task for a state like Texas when only horses and a few rail roads are available for transportation) then collecting and counting the votes at the capital of the state and then sending messengers back to each district to announce results. When each district calculates their winner independently this problem is alleviated.

Nowadays it's clear that such a system will inevitably create a two party system. The fact that the president is also elected by an electoral college (which in most states is also a winner takes it all system) further enforces an effective two party system.
The US throws out tons of food so we probably need less here, actually
Smoke Forecast – Firesmoke.ca
How US-China tensions shattered Sequoia’s venture capital empire
> Cheating with elections is so much easier with district voting than proportional representation.

It's the opposite. A single compromised location can tip a in a national popular election. It almost becomes an arms race of cheating.

With district based they can only affect their district.
Same. I typically have 4 or 5 threads of things I’m working on simultaneously. It takes a bunch of time to get back in that headspace.
The website is available at https://test262.fyi/ FYI
This was my experience a couple years ago as well. I absolutely love San Francisco and it's my favorite US city outside of my own. I'm used to the general dirt and grime of cities (my child knows to be suspicious of wet ground, especially when it's in corners and it hasn't rained recently) along with the many colorful people that inhabit them. In my recent trip to San Francisco, things were well beyond what I'd expected. One end of the BART car had a pile of human feces, as did the station, and someone had clearly urinated while on the up escalator to make a nice trail. On Market street, there was trash and tents, and at least one person squatting to go to the bathroom. I popped into a store to grab some sundries, and the interior looked more like the store was at the tail end of a going out of business sale.

Outside of downtown it felt a little better, but it was such a shocking difference from my previous trips to the city.
> Its a compromise that while political power is still very much centered in Reykjavík, they can't blindly ignore the country population.

I don't understand arguments like this. This logic is symmetric! Can't Reykjavík residents equally claim that their interests are being "blindly ignored" by the rural population who rule them? Isn't there a "power imbalance" at work already? Why does cutting the population based on location make sense to "reduce the political power imbalance" but not by other demographic metrics like gender or age or religion which also correlate with political preference?

This argument[1] seems to take as a prior that not just any minority group, but specific minority groups[2] need to be given power disproportionate to its population? If someone tried to deploy this logic in favor of another minority group (Catholics? Men? Trade workers?) you'd agree that would be wrong, right?

[1] Which we all know isn't about Iceland at all.

[2] Suspiciously, always groups aligned with the person making the argument.
Funny, I just checked up on the status of this project yesterday! I've been on the lookout for a personal CRM for a long time and have had my eye on Monica for months.

It looks really promising but I could not for the life of me get it to run in the Docker container last time I tried. I have a dozen or so other Docker containers running without issue, so I don't think it's my setup. Are people reporting better success with Chandler when it comes to containerization? I'd love to use it but have spent too many hours trying to get it to work.
Scientists claim >99 percent identification rate of ChatGPT content
Can Web Apps use tabs? As in, if I command click a link, will it open in a native tab in the Web App? If they can't, then a bunch of apps I want to use as web apps will have to stay within the main browser unfortunately.
For voice generation, or voice cloning?

For voice generation there are many. For voice cloning, most are much worse (they require much more sample data). Play.ht is decent but requires 2-3 hours of sample instead of 5 minutes.
That still does not address my point. Regardless initial conditions, during Covid, productivity was not impacted. So the “unqualified” remote workers still did fine. The question is what has changed since Covid, and what has changed is the clarity of employers direction with regards to working arrangements. That domination will come at a cost when it is measured by physical presence rather than delivery. In a sense it is also easier to just show up and do less. Let alone the confusion out of the fact that remote enabled geographic spread which now means that you start getting wrong way risk on enforcement and assertion of dominance. My argument is that in reality the world works in more mysterious ways than at face value.
In the olden days, you could “spontaneously” be productive by spending 2 hours talking to coworkers about something that will never ship - meanwhile the due date for your actual project just went out by 2 hours.

I prefer coworking for the “body doubling” effect. Social pressure keeps my anti-productive tendencies in check.
That's true of course, but renting an EV for like 20€ a day is way waaaay cheaper than buying/maintaining/registering a car if you only need it for occasional trips, or even taking a cab for shorter journeys. Like I don't buy an airplane if I'm gonna take 3 flights per year.
I use RSS through Feedly. Is that what you mean?
Not if they follow biblical precedent.
I'd love to do that as well - my idea would also involve a large body of water to stabilize the temperature variations. It can double-up as a swimming pool and as a source of drinking water for the "coming apocalypse". Likewise, the water can be used to grow some plants in that glass-topped courtyard, that can act as a greenhouse.
OpenLLaMA – comparable performance and better in several task to original LLaMA
‘Only 11 other people have completed it’: cycling the 7,600km European Divide
It's pretty cool though how other people went out of their way to say how bothered by it they weren't, congratulations guys, you're all real champs.
I'm in luck: I live in the Netherlands. Even though I have two teenage kids, I do not need to own a car, as I found out when I sold mine a few months back.

My youngest literally said: I'm so glad we got rid of the car, because using trains is way more fun.

Using the public transport at age 12 is far more empowering than sitting in the back of a car.
There’s quite a lot of data to backup that assertion. It’s not like nobody has bothered to study it.

It’s also kind of self evident. How can forcing everyone to buy, maintain and drag around 2 tons of machinery everywhere ever be cheaper and more efficient than using the legs you already have? Obviously there are those that physically need mechanical assistance to move around, but they’re the minority, we can accommodate them without forcing mechanical dependency on everyone.
The list is basically the news: https://www.google.com/search?q=green+hydrogen&tbm=nws&sa=X&...

The facts are so far into the realm of "it's already happening now" that what you're asking is akin to demanding proof that Russia is at war with Ukraine right now.
I find Midwestern cities are a good balance for that. In Milwaukee now and it's very easy/cheap to own a car (which we do) but most day to day needs are easily done without it. My wife and I combined drive a bit more than once a week on average, and most trips are either out of town or "the weather is mildly annoying and I don't feel like walking/biking today."

I know a lot of families living a similar 0-1 car life here too.
DirectX9 on DirectX12 Mapping Layer
The last three are taken from the OPs Zig example, and is not valid Rust at all.
Clearing up some misconceptions about Passkeys
Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality
There was an attempt to do this at some point in Alabama. I can't find it right now but a group made up a bunch of "Who decides your X? The party or the people?" with hammer & sickle logos on it.
I guess it depends upon where in the world you go though my recent conference experience is definitely a post-COVID one. No rules, no masks, no social distancing etc (RISC-V Summit Europe, Barcelona).

I went to the US RISC-V summit in December (San Jose) and they had little badges (red/yellow/green to indicate how comfortable you were with people getting close) and I think they asked people to wear masks but very few did. They also asked for a pre-conference test but I don't think they were checking up on results.

Mandatory, proper face fitting N95 masks seems out of step there. Though I can appreciate it may aid some in attending it will certainly discourage others.
I'm not trying to "debate" anything here.

I do note that those Guix people that are feeling competitive towards Nix for whatever reason tend to over-rely on two arguments that just do not work too well when examined closely.

The first is "Nix is obscure the way Guile is not". I would argue both are equally obscure and neither is obscure enough for its quality or UX to suffer for it. And does expertise in Guile (base Scheme is trivial) carry over anywhere interesting?

The second is "Macros!", where the implied idea is that unrestricted syntactic extensibility is Good. Well, I like Lisp (more partial to CL then Scheme, but who cares at this resolution), and I find unrestricted syntactic extensibility to be more of a hazard than a benefit; plus the expressivity of a non-strict FP language really gets you close enough for practical purposes.
People should realize the best part of Netdata is that it can export data to be stored for Grafana to consume.

I don't like its own UI but no need to use it and it can easily gather metrics from systemd services and containers.
Having just started on creating chrome extensions recently:

a) I was surprised that they don't require access to the source code in order to review. I wrote everything using typescript and uploaded the packed/obfuscated output, which wasn't a problem at all. I'm sure they have software that unpacks and attempts to detect hazardous patterns, but clearly humans are not actually trying to understand the code's structure. It would be a low bar to require well commented source code (and even to require certain coding conventions) to make extension code more reviewable. Want to be on our platform? Write it this way. Show us the source.

b) On the flip side, trying to do anything interesting requires adding permission after permission to the manifest, which of course results in the scary messaging at install time. While you're asked to justify each permission when you upload, as far as I'm aware extension authors have to provide their own copy to end users attempting to explain permissions - I've certainly never seen it as an end user when installing an extension. Including these explanations either in the initial install dialog, or on first usage of each permission, would be beneficial. Of course this would require that extension reviewers verify the usage of each of the permissions, but since they're universally accessed through the chrome api, they should be easy to spot in the source (and #a would help this significantly).
You’d be hailed as a genius if you replaced s-expressions with yaml.
> EDIT: If everyone ditched their cars, the housing crisis that is currently happening in literally every city in the developed world, will only get much worse.

Or more funding will go towards public transportation. There will be more room left from parking for new housing. Less money will be spent on infrastructure maintenance. City planners can work on walkable cities instead of drivable cities. Cities will be quieter and safer.
My question is how are these extensions with malware being "featured" on the web store? Are humans at Google running these applications and featuring them or is it AI/an algorithm?
No, it sounds like the exact opposite of this: People who have no connection with the reality of a class of people they don’t understand or care about but want to use as puppets to prove a point.

It’s the people saying “Sex workers should just use crypto, it will solve all their problems!” who are lacking empathy, and not the people listing very plausible reasons why “Magic solution X” doesn’t make any problems go away.
Having tabs would just make it a browser. Your description leads me to believe you want a browser anyways, not a single app experience whatsoever.
Yeah.

They include both questions like "Now here are some statements which represent some traditional American values... The state of morality in this country is bad and getting worse." and similar "morals and ethics" questions, as well as questions about gun violence and the like. They're lumping them both together.

They say (in the study) that the questions asked about specific things show there has been no actual change, but the questions about "day to day morality" (of which I actually only see a question about people being willing to help each other) could easily be drowned out by the rest of the questions if they showed change.

It's almost like no one remembered the basic rule of statistical analysis - double check (think twice) that the data measured is actually a reflection of the phenomenon you want to measure.
> The exact benefit premium membership gives you is hiding ads

The same can be trivially done with a browser add-on, which is exactly why their premium offering is a nonsensical one. I've been a premium member for several years and I view it strictly as a show of support for what they do, nothing else.

If they want the ad revenue, they need to control the delivery. Hence the push for the official app. Lots of people don't like the app, some don't like ads and they are opinionated because Reddit is a part of their routine. So, no, I disagree with you completely that offering a paid option to participate in Reddit on users' own terms will not be in demand.
They fairly explicitly call out that "Bias for Action" applies to low stakes, or easily reversible decisions, whereas "Dive Deep" applies to irreversible, high stakes decisions[0].

"Insisting on the Highest Standards" doesn't conflict with "Bias for Action" either. You can take a quick action, realise it's not up to a high standard and insist that it's improved; as opposed to saying "good enough, we're done".

[0] https://aws.amazon.com/executive-insights/content/leading-an...
"Sorry, you'll have to give me 15. I'll send you a message when I'm available, OK?"
HOW DO YOU ENSURE THAT PEACE IS KEPT AFTER THE ARMISTICE? WHAT KEEPS RUSSIA FROM ATTACKING AGAIN?
Perhaps the author wants to eat and have a beer sometime?