skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So have I only used the official apps, and I believe most users are in the same bucket.

But. I'm not a mod. I don't know what mods use. And the only reason reddit is good is because communities have tools to moderate themselves.

What I use is kind of irrelevant if the people who keep the communities I visit consistent and relatively clean are pissed and walk out. A casual user won't drop the site when Apolo closes, it would be slightly later when reddit becomes 4chan in absence of moderation.
You don't believe in the "wisdom of crowds" I take it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wisdom_of_Crowds
We have done both of those, but results were meh.

Seems like content is king. That's probably a good thing, since it's how we can effectively compete against competitors whose ad budgets run into 7 figures.
Supreme Court rules in favor of unexpected defense of Voting Rights Act
Yep, hardware Passkeys can't.
I think at least when it comes to technical subreddits, they're already here anyway.

I don't think the average reddit user will see HN as a replacement.
Looks great.

Does it support live updating via websocket/sse ?
What America looked like before the EPA cleaned it up
Are you... treating a language model as a doctor?
Yea, I read that. I think that's a negative outlook. How many of those customers are sympathetic and would re-up at a new subscription rate? How many sympathetic new subscriptions could be generated? Refund current outstanding subs, and start a new sub, never take a hit. I mean, don't get me wrong, they can do whatever they want, it just doesn't seem like the dead end they make it.
Yep. I’ll bet you did something bad once too. Now all the points you make are invalid forever.
The citations you gave were textbook examples of vague statements.

They said there were 13 risks and that 8 would be bad/endanger troops if China and or Russia were aware. That’s it. How many troops? Endanger them how? What kind of information are talking about? Sources and methods? Weapons systems? Other technology? Literally any detail???

I understand your position is that “they’re in a bind”. Well, there shouldn’t have squandered their reputation by lying about major issues facing the American people like war making, mass surveillance, illegal activities, etc.

Finally, the sheer number of documents he extracted was a red herring/immaterial to nation security. All that matters is content.

Edit: a move careful reading of the report demonstrates that the 1.5 million number appears to only refer to the number of non blank documents that were downloaded, it is not at all clear that the is any way for the government to get a precise measurement of what Snowden actually took with him to Hong Kong and disclosed. Anything that hasn’t been disclosed in public would therefore be purely speculative on the part of the US government.

Edit 2: a more careful reading of the section that outlines how he took the documents shows that “removed” simply constitutes the number of documents that he downloaded off of the respective NSA networks onto his local machines while at work. It says nothing about what he actually took offsite. Everything in the risk assessments are purely speculative based on what he had access to from the automated downloads he implemented.
Train for a triathlon and maybe complete one.
There have been subreddit going dark for 2-3 days en masse in the past. IIRC they usually accomplished their stated goal.
Do you mean rather: 1:13k Fe:C

From that Wikipedia item,

"Each iron atom converted at least 13,000 carbon atoms into algae."
It's the stock, but only when the stock is publicly traded.

I have zero trust in the long term outlook of my current firm. My stock vests every 3 months and I sell it immediately. This makes up about half of my total compensation.

If the company shows signs of going down I'll cut my losses and go somewhere else, probably when the stock drops to about 50% of my sign-on value. If the company starts going up then I get a nice little bump.

I joined Meta last year (and then got laid off 6 months later) right after their huge drop and several people (including my manager) were extremely vocal about how it wasn't fair that I got so many shares of stock. They compute the number of shares you get based on a dollar amount and the share price over the last month.

By comparison I feel bad for my brethren at large tech companies that aren't publicly traded. Stripe comes to mind here. My friends there say they've been told "we want to go public, but now just isn't the right time" all the way up until the valuation was cut by a third. Those golden handcuffs must be heavy.
Sync had an awesome redesign of their app recently but ruined it by embedding ads into it. Some of the ads are even animated when reading the comments. As a result, I don't feel bad for the developer of Sync - they had it coming really.
Thanks, makes complete sense :) We'll work on that!
agreed. Owning Apollo doesnt reduce the opportunity cost. They still lose 20M, but now they own Apollo.
Food is a bit different in that we export a fair amount; it's not like we're running up against the limits of what our farmland can produce. For what it's worth I absolutely abhor the phrases "they're more willing to do that work" or "it's work that American's won't do." You're missing the last part of that sentence: for that pay.

Of course costs will go up. So will pay. You're right in that in the case of food it's hard to say how that would all equalize. However, are we to rely on what's essentially an underclass forever? That seems pretty dystopian, and unsustainable.

Home prices I'd argue wouldn't be affected as much. The "dumb" labor in building houses is pretty cheap. Framing, roofing, etc. isn't much of the labor cost and they aren't on the jobsite for that long. Skilled work such as plumbers, electricians, and the like cost much more. There are kind of inbetween jobs such as drywall taping and tiling and I don't know how much of that is done with immigrant labor. In my experience it's basically none but I could be off on that.
I feel like in the age of cancel culture, this adage isn't really a thing anymore. News travels too far and too fast.
Why do you think the Bloodletters set back science? As if there was anybody at that time that would have made more rapid progress if only they hadn't been held back.

Science isn't a strait line of analytical progression, and when it does get side tracked, it isn't some nefarious group. I could just as easily say if only those stupid String Theorist had just stepped aside, we wouldn't have set Physics back a decade.

It's human dynamics, hmmm, I wonder if there is someone studying why groups get stuck in these loops, hmmm, why do humans seem to get stuck at a plateau that is difficult to think beyond, hmmmm let me think now, hmmm. Psychologist?
Lately I've been running Fedora.

Early Ubtuntu & Mark Shuttleworth were a big part of my teens and my first real experience with a Linux Desktop and Philosophy tied to Open Source Software.

It's been fun watching Ubuntu evolve over the years and see distros like Mint evolve off of them as well.
Some of us in gen z don't see much of a point to killing people in real life, but don't see the harm in video games. Neither have any "real purpose" other than making money.
Maybe they should start by selling one?
Christian came off somewhat flippantly and didn’t sound particularly experienced, but overall I trust his account of things. The reddit CEO seems like a weirdo to me.
Yeah I think the 16's will be very popular. Do you know if the Ethernet adapter still sticks out past the edge of the unit?
The really interesting clincher wasn't the association of taurine with anti-aging, but the association of exercise with increased serum concentrations of taurine.
What makes this not just another tool to be abused by micromanagers?

Not everything needs to be measured, and indeed, measuring some things can cause more harm than good, especially as the measurements are often devoid of any kind of context.
Apollo needs to launch its own backend IMO. Reddit itself isn't some technological marvel.
I never thought Reddit would be so aggressive with their community after how poorly things went for Twitter.

Why not roll out these changes slower and ramp up fees over time? Why not give app developers time to adapt?

Apollo is written by one guy. Is it really fair to tell him to rewrite his business model and make significant changes to his app in just a month or two?
Productive… not sure the military produces much. More on the blow things up side of the divide if ya ask me.

But sure, if they don’t lose a limb, die or become traumatized and kill themselves it’s not a bad life course.
Hike as much of the Sierras as is humanly possible. Not the PCT, but as many trails as I could up and down, East and West, whatever.
I have been laid 0 times this year. At least I'm not near bankruptcy.
Tangentially: the Japanese rice crackers wrapped in seaweed are num.
I find that hilarious because we did that back in the day on laptops that let you put batteries in instead of a cd or floppy drive.

Then Apple happened and ever laptop maker only saw the cash, abondend what users needed and wanted to copy what Apple was peddling including making parts on replacable.

Now after waisting all these resources on form over function even Apple has started to go back to function (at least a tiny bit).
the_donald made it very clear that they were a subreddit trying to mimic a Trump campaign rally. You could even be a conservative, mildly critical of Trump's policy and still get banned. It never claimed to be unbiased and proudly proclaimed the opposite.

On the other hand, we expect some level of fairness and professionalism from Reddit and its administrators.
> You’re using a gish gallop style list of random claims.

Am I? Looking back at my posts above it seems my main claims are:

- Hydrogen storage isn't a solved problem, unless there's some recent breakthrough I'm not aware of.

- Fuel cells remain expensive, and don't have particularly high efficiency.

- Electrolyzers still need to come down in cost and increase in efficiency.

AFAIU this is largely the consensus position of people who research the energy transition professionally. You're the one with outrageous claims, thus you're the one who needs to provide evidence for those claims in order to be taken seriously.

> There is not one science article that pushes back on every one of your points.

If you read my posts above you'll see that I never demanded everything should be published in one single articles. Multiple articles are fine, you're free to provide references to multiple articles corroborating your claims!

> The main thing to note is that fuel cell cars already exist.

So far it seems they are outrageously expensive. Not a very convincing alternative to BEV's so far. Which might be why several orders of magnitudes more BEV's are taken into use every year than the total number of FCEV's on the planet (I vaguelly remember figures like 70k FCEV's globally vs. 1.4M BEV's sold per year, but I'm too lazy to dig up the exact numbers).

> That alone debunks a vast number of supposedly unsolved problems.

I don't think anyone has claimed that FCEV's would be impossible to make. Just that they're much inferior to BEV's, barring some major breakthroughs that you claim have been done but for some reason refuse to share with us.

> Meanwhile, electrolysis approaches 100% efficiency:

Awesome. And better, in that press release there's even a link to the actual article, which, even better, is open access: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28953-x

Of course, this is a lab result. Hope they manage to scale it up. And one might note that even if FCEV's are a failure, there's certainly a lot of use for low cost green hydrogen in decarbonizing ammonia and steel production as well as other industrial processes.
MSM media is always trying to convince people they can live longer if they stick with coffee, berries, dark chocolate and wine — as if those foods needed boosters. And if true I’m quite sure we’d have people out there living to 150…
Yep and it's completely legal here too as long as one participant knows and is fine with it being recorded (him in this instance).
will it ship with a terminal or ide apps?
Just to clarify, are you referring to a specific situation you're in, or are you referring to lawyers / messes in general?
I agree the "of" didn't make sense but thought the previous word was a completely different meaning.
Not sure why you are talking about "someone who doesn't know the principles" to a message that explicitly says "Yes, managers need to have some part of their work in the trenches".

I've been in meetings that were power struggle without any progress, I've also been in meetings that were really useful to solve the problem, way faster than the contributors shooting in the dark because they think they too smart to dialogue. The direction of the meeting depends way more of the mentality of the participants and on their skill to solve problems smartly than of the manager. If you go to the meeting with in mind the idea that the meeting is useless, obviously, you will stir it in the wrong direction (and apparently, you are prone to jump to the first cliché conclusion, I can imagine that you will interpret any contribution in the worst way possible). It does not mean that with participants with a better mentality, the meeting would not have been 10x faster than with single contributors tackling parts of the problem.

Don't get me wrong, shitty meetings happen. But if all the meeting you've been were shitty, maybe the problem is on your side. And if you always end up with the bad manager, it may also be that, with your attitude, you are not worth the time of a good one (or not, but at least do not exclude this possibility just because you dislike it)
Yeah whenever I see "Privacy" segments in their marketing, it's hard for me to avoid thinking of it as "Here's how our anti-competitive moat works."
I'll wait a year and open GPT-5, point to the Adobe Creative Suite, and tell it "make dis" for $20.
> the client (3th party) users are only a loud minority

The loud minority argument assumes homogenous cohorts, and that the loudness happens to cluster around inconsequential things. These criteria are almost never satisfied in practice.

Any online community today has extreme differences: usually a tiny minority contribute almost all content to the site (posts, comments). In Reddit’s case, moderation is also done by human volunteers assured by 3p bots (as opposed to automated ML policing + human intervention when someone famous gets sour). The vast majority of users are passively consuming, occasionally upvoting/downvoting.

Now, Reddit gained a massive amount of users in the last few years (something like 2x-4x) so bean counters start drooling over ad revenue from them. They may think that the old timers, power users and mods are a minority that can be gradually replaced by the new user pool without major incident. I don’t know if that’s true, but I’m pretty sure that the bean counters don’t know either, simply because the graphs they’re looking at don’t have the predictive power they think. They’re risking the company’s main asset to find out.
Yup. Same way Gmail neutered tracking pixels in emails back in the day. They open each one as soon as the email is received, rather than when the recipient opens it.
... and female rhesus monkeys.
I use reddit exclusively though Apollo, so that will happen whether I like it or not starting June 30th... have no intention of installing the Reddit app.
But it is moderated away, via user flags, and you can't even see it unless showdead is on. You can't really judge things based on this IMHO, because you're essentially judging a community based on posts it removed.

Whether or not they should be banned just for this: I don't know – maybe? It's not a new account and I didn't check their history, who knows what they meant with "colored"? I'm guessing dang never even saw it; there are hundreds if not thousands of posts every day!

Killing the entire thread was probably a good thing though; there is nothing productive there.
Why do the people even want the internet anyways, they like getting everything from apple
Couldn't have worded it better...
Centuries? Try millennia. Entire religions have been built around the idea that death in battle will give you virgins in the afterlife.

In fact, I’d be more interested in an example of any military in history that didn’t use some sort of promise of fornication in recruitment.
I can't change the world, but I can control my individual actions. I'll be deleting my Reddit account by the end of the month. Reddit is basically unusable for me from all their default surfaces:
1. Mobile website has large banners to download the app.
2. Mobile app is confusing as shit and tries to mimic TikTok
3. Desktop browsing experience is probably one of the worst apps. I've been using old.reddit and RES to keep it somewhat useable.
Reddit has been mired in controversy since day one. It is also regularly touted on HN as THE ONLY trustworthy place on the web to find, for example, honest product reviews; where Google, Amazon, Yelp, Wirecutter etc are hopelessly corrupted. I'm not buying that a brief fit of bad PR will hurt them; and in the meantime Reddit thinks there's 20m of revenue on the table they will recapture when the app goes away.
For real, America already brainwashes its populace into worshipping the Armed Forces and the flag anyway (cue the anecdotes saying otherwise) so why not make everybody part of it? Tie that to free college education and a 2-4 yrs compulsory service would cover the vast majority of degrees seen around here (4yrs compsci). Might even teach discipline and teach people valuable skills regarding fitness and self sufficiency.

I'm serious. On the surface it seems like I would have hated it myself, but I can't help but agree that I might have learned discipline and having a clear path through college would have been so much simpler.

(Before anyone argues that sending all youth to fight is bad (tm), other countries with compulsory service typically do not deploy people during that period. They usually get the same training but only clerical or local work).
I’m not sure what Reddit’s rationale is here. Third-party app users are less than 1% (can’t find the link where I read this). The most plausible explanation is that they want to get rid of a potential future threat, because I don’t believe that current third-party usage constitutes any substantial loss. Otherwise buying out Apollo as mentioned in TFA should have been an easy decision.
need more whale poop to keep the fertilization cycle going.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2309262-scientists-want...

https://www.dw.com/en/artificial-whale-poop-could-save-the-p...

and burning Australia is a proven way to generate more plankton. https://nicholas.duke.edu/news/australian-wildfires-triggere....
If you take Essential Amino Acids your body will make whichever aminos it needs most.

You can target supplement something, but it might not be the most critical link at the moment.
I wonder is it a regional or dialect or cultural thing? The ones listed in the compiler paper and on the AMD driver had names that were not anglo american names. I'm not saying it's bad I'm just wondering maybe it's why I didn't hear 'dead loop' before, because I'm too blinkered not cosmopolitan enough in my understanding of tech jargon.
Underlying your perspective is the idea that economic activity is only about growth or efficiency or "winning". Governments have very different interests, such as maintaining social order, protecting vital industries and spurring innovation. A government doesn't care if their industrial policy is sub-optimal from a growth-uber-alles perceptive. Only a tiny sliver of libertarian-types think that way and those people rarely if ever hold significant political power.
Don't forget that they're getting their tokens from an OAuth endpoint. In otherwords it's already tied to a specific user. Reddit could have simply said "third party api support is only for reddit gold users".
while I do not think their comment was helpful, I don't disagree with it.
Surely though there's still plenty of places in the world that, on the basis of labour costs, it would be vastly cheaper to operate than in the US. On that basis I'm not convinced wage growth in SE Asia is the primary reason the US manufacturing industry is deciding to reshore. Is the same phenomenon occurring in other wealthy countries that haven't put in place taxpayer funded incentives to do so?
“Anyone who can be fooled by an internet scam should be sent to war” is faulty in two ways, given that it hinges on a young person making poorly informed decisions:

- being sent to war should probably not be the result of being young and gullible
- if we need to send anyone to war, should we send the dumbest people we can find?
If you want to see a bunch of these classic steam gauges in action this is a great video (starts right before spool up):

https://youtu.be/JSKYoqVPtWw?t=86

Here's a video of a 747-100 from 2001 that has run through of the flight engineers console but low-def:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x00ta8xC4oc

Then there is this amazing video that captures the sound of the 747 classic "buzzsaw" sound better than any other (due to microphone placement and the 747SP having engines closer to the cockpit):

https://youtu.be/3lhHwKK-6ms?t=313
It's probably just caffeine.
1997 is usually talked about as the start of gen z, I think. One good metric is that millennials usually remember 9/11, and gen z people usually don't.
The thing is, I think a lot of moderators use third-party apps.

So, while it may be a small percentage of users, I suspect that losing them (or even just impairing their ability to moderate) will have an outsized negative impact on reddit.
Yes your blood sugar is regulated by insulin
You mean the guy that manually edits posts in the Production DB that he disagrees with? Nah, no way he’d pull a stunt like that.
> or sometimes (IMHO wrongly, but I've seen it a few times) also used as a name for an endless loop.

I think that’s because C and C++ compilers often are allowed to assume that a loop will terminate (reading https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2809R0.html, they do not fully agree on when they are allowed to do that)
I completely take your point, and would _love_ some kind of negative externality to keep from scrolling to much. I'd see that as a positive.
I use old.reddit on iOS safari, works well
How do you think the Apollo users will lose access to Reddit?
So, how do you apply this to carbon sequestration in seaweed ?
That’s a high amount of sugar. That by itself can’t be too good.
I mean if the US can keep the front lines of the hypothetical Warsaw Pact vs NATO fight in Europe it's really good the US since they won't get bombed.

A lot of American Exceptionalism comes from the fact that EU got absolutely destroyed by world wars while the US got to keep chugging along.
A note about api pricing: I imagine many of these social networks will give themselves a reality check in terms of true value to their users, after years of everything for free. I believe there are pretty, pretty hard times ahead of FB, Twitter et al., once reality truly hits. And from what seems to be the disparity of perception in terms of api pricing/value at reddit, they too. 20 million.. lol. I mean, who will be even able to pay that? Same at Twitter's api pricing. For many, like it appears to be the case with Apollo, it is not even an viable alternative.
It sure as shit aint good for their upcoming IPO
SIMD-ized faster parse of IPv4 addresses
It's particularly interesting that Tree Borrows treats all mutable references as two-phase borrows, which seems to have unexpected benefits and could make the model more permissive
And wasn't it the Twitterrific client that came up with the phrase "tweet", and they also introduced the blue bird icon.

Then musk took over, and he banned them from using the API and forced them to close down. What a stand up guy.
Cost of ‘reformatting’ prompts a call for journals to change their requirements