skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Was the laptop advertised as supporting Linux, or, if not, did you at least do your research ahead of time to ensure that everything worked properly? Because clearly it didn't, so I expect Linux support was already known to not be in a great place before you bought it.

And yes, that sucks. We should have first-class support. It's no wonder macOS gained popularity among developers. But I've been running Linux on laptops for 15+ years now (even on Macs), and I've seen how it's changed from barely-working and having to futz with things at every kernel upgrade, to pretty much seamless (and these days I really have little patience for futzing around with things; I want something that works so I can do useful things on it). But, again: you need to choose your hardware carefully.

For reference, I had a 2016-model Razer Blade Stealth, which had no issues with Linux. Then in early 2019 I bought a 2018-model Dell XPS 13 that worked flawlessly (except for the fingerprint reader, which I knew ahead of time and accepted as ok). For the past yearish I've been using a Framework Laptop, which has had some problems (unrelated to Linux; Windows users have the same problems), but the hardware support on Linux has been solid.

Meanwhile, I'd constantly hear problems from my friends with Macs about how it could never stay connected to a wireless network after a couple hours (requiring a reboot to fix), or would frequently "beachball" under not that much load, or how the yearly major OS update would usually break their development setup. I used macOS on and off between 2005 and 2017 or so, and ran into plenty of issues as well.

While I certainly agree there's some laptop hardware that you just shouldn't run Linux on, the still-kicking Steve Jobs Reality Distortion Field somehow causes people to ignore or explain away all the issues macOS has.
I remember a lot of sealioning and a lot of users here becoming frustrated at bad faith arguments. Debates were frequently less than civil.

Also note that you are quoting a relatively biased pro-business thinktank who is only looking at mortality and extrapolating success/failure. A complete perspective would need to look at reduction of local hospital system burden as well.
To be clear, for Apple, I would consider the Apple Watch a flop.

Sure the product exists and people buy them, but it's no earth shaker - in contrast, a success for Apple is iPad, iPhone, Macintosh - products that if you ask some random person in an affluent country, there's a pretty good chance they own one, two three or more of these products.

The Apple VR headset will not be a flop in the sense that Apple probably won't kill the product, but it also won't be any huge success by the measures above. It will at best be a niche, which is a flop for Apple.
Think about it from Apple's perspective. How much does the iPhone app store make for them? How much does software on the Mac make for them? All software that is ever installed on a Mac, what is their cut. What would you do? Of course it's going to be locked down like an iPhone.
I wasn't asking questions. I was making a categorical statement of objective reality: at the time it was physically impossible to know how many doses of the vaccine, on what schedule, would achieve the best balance of effectiveness vs. safety.

This was the content of my comment, which got me banned from /r/CanadaCoronavirus.
I explicitly acknowledge analog hole in my other comments in this thread and suggest advanced sensors (as used in existing biometric authentication) and LIDAR as potential solution. Nevertheless, I think this system can be very useful even without those countermeasures and even if it can still be bypassed with effort. Additionally, if the signatures are securely time-stamped it makes proving which photo is genuine straightforward.
Why is commercial necessary to run local models?
"As it does every autumn, on Wednesday morning, the tax authority published a list of people who earned more than 100,000 euros last year."

The government should not invade people's privacy in this manner.
Passkey proponents have played really fast and loose with the word "sync" in my experience. No reasonable outside observer would call this syncing, it's cross-device sign-in.

It's like saying you can sync your OTP-provider to your desktop computer because when you go to log into a website you manually copy the code into a form. That's not how most people understand the word "sync."

What people are excited about here (assuming the details are good) is actual sync -- the ability to take your iCloud passkeys and literally move them to a new device outside of Apple's ecosystem as a mass operation rather than site-by-site. And that's really good and I'm excited about it and I hope that it addresses all of my issues. But its frustrating to see people still misrepresenting what's capable with the ecosystem today even under a positive announcement that signals that the actual concerns are getting addressed.

It's so weird, I don't know of any other open standard I've seen where the proponents are so creative about acting like the ecosystem already supports things that aren't supported yet, and it's a huge reason why I remain skeptical of the passkey ecosystem -- because there are good-faith actors telling me to trust them but they're surrounded by people who are straight-up giving incorrect answers to basic questions like "is sync supported." I don't get it. If the limitations are going to be addressed, what is the value in pretending that they don't exist? How does the ecosystem benefit from that? All it does is decrease trust, to the point where I feel like I need to double-check every assurance I get from FIDO advocates to make sure that they're not redefining words.
Ah yes, good old

(declaim (optimize (safety 0)))
No this is completely wrong. Over the age of 40, a perfectly healthy, functioning and complaint-free individual can have alarmingly high blood pressure. Often it's hereditary. They can even have an obese sibling who's just fine.
Hey folks! Author of Absinthe here, feel free to ask me any questions.
There's a growing case for renaming personality disorders
The financial impact from the Reddit API data agreements
How many of those biggest parties do you expect to give/sell the data to new players if it'd even be legal for them to do so. Closing the gates can still provide a revenue stream for Reddit, especially if they do it early enough into the hype cycle.
ChatGPT - prompt Engineering is the way my friend.
I would add https://devurls.com/
careful you're putting descartes before the wh... nevermind
I think you stand a much better chance to mobilize society against a million-times-worse problem they've never considered that happens invisibly, far from shore, on the seabed, if you first prime them to agree that the small problem is real.

It's possible that vested interests will try to twist the narrative once it begins to turn against them: "Do your part to sort plastics into bins, not the trash! Pay no attention to the single-use packaging manufacturers generating all that difficult-to-sort, difficult-to-process waste." "Freshwater is a resource that needs to be conserved! Turn the 1 gpm tap off while brushing your teeth. Ignore the 1000 gpm center-pivot industrial farm growing alfalfa in the California desert." etc. but that's risky.

I think that recognizing that invertebrates on the ocean floor can be victims of animal cruelty is step 1 in reducing trawling, pollution, and global warming that harms those animals.
I have a hard time understanding the reasons why people focus on the wrong problems in large scale systems. N+1, for example, is bad, and we all know it. However, these examples always show strong coupling between database and API representations, and this is a far bigger problem in large scale systems.
While writing a fancy word counter I learnt that glibc iswspace (or the glibc locale data) actually does not consider non-breaking spaces as, well, spaces even when using a Unicode locale. This apparently conforms to ISO 30112. (For example MSVCRT does do so.)

I happened to notice this via a result mismatch as GNU wc does count NBSPs as word separators. Even though it uses iswspace, it also additionally checks for a hard coded set of Unicode non-breaking spaces.

(I have to say I'm a bit surprised at being at getting voted hidden here. I thought this was mostly related to the topic at hand. I would of course gladly be corrected if mistaken about the details.)
I've never seen the use-case.

If you're building trivial brochure pages that need SSR for adsense, you shouldnt be using react at all.

If you're building complex apps, it doesn't really make much sense to put the burden of rendering on your server.
Gpt4 thinks it’s a factorial. https://chat.openai.com/share/2b085148-2629-40e6-86b0-b22a2b...
Sounds like Grusch is upstanding, but I suspect he's been trolled by the rest of them.

You can just imagine; "hey Eagle, the UFO guy's coming to ask about that UAP report, you know, the one where the IR tracker locked-on to a speck of dust. Let's mention the (nudge, hehe) black-ops alien testing site we saw when we went to file the report"
It makes syncing between llama.cpp, whisper.cpp, and ggml itself quite straightforward.

I think the lesson here is that this setup has enabled some very high-speed project evolution or, at least, not got in its way. If that is surprising and you were expecting downsides, a) why; and b) where did they go?
At the time Apple did this, they had already been soldering RAM onto the motherboards of iPhones because phones needed the smaller envelope. At the time, it was probably more about saving money on manufacturing by not having extra, moving parts, and making it simpler to automate the fabrication. Also, even back then, this would have an impact on thermals and size, which could easily be the only justification needed.
In my experience, Svelte made me much less productive because I was fighting with magic. I'd get stuck on obscure issues for hours.
In Germany, most Twitch streamers are pissed off at twitch anyway. They only want to chip in 10k for big events for example - private tv broadcasters are putting in way more money and getting the community to their sites.

Also: The old 70/30 deals that some had, expired. 5€ subs got turned to 4€ subs so twitch has to pay less for twitch prime subs.

But there's no real alternative, YouTube streaming is terrible (no community feeling), kick.com is the refugee island for casino streamers.
Seriously...this place is rife with drones who accuse people of being pro-Russian trolls. Kills all interesting discussion except western propaganda talking points, so that's something I guess.
> Unified memory that is also high bandwidth.

I do think Apple is smart in using memory the way they are. It's the future. But AMD routinely posts higher performance numbers for CPU and GPU because their large caches boast similarly high memory bandwidth figures and AMD's cores have significantly higher IPC. I also think Apple's trick of extending the ARM ISA to allow for x86 style memory alignment is slick for fast emulation. Credit where it's due. Apple's caches are also very fast, just not as large as AMD's. In short, memory bandwidth is just one measurement of the bandwidth along the entire disk bandwidth <-> disk cache bandwidth <-> PCIe bandwidth <-> main memory bandwidth <-> L4 / L3 / L2 / L1 cache bandwidth hierarchy, and details about cache coherency, associativity, eviction strategies, branch prediction, and other sundries matter along the way.

My 8 core Ryzen 5800x3D certainly compiles code a LOT faster than my 8 core M1 Mac despite the difference in main memory bandwidth.

More memory is almost always going to mean that memory is slower, and Ryzen can handle more memory. Ryzen's architected with large caches and prefetching and all kinds of other goodies with that in mind.

> Use Geekbench 6. It's closest to SPEC and optimizes well for both x86 and ARM.

Geekbench is a synthetic benchmark. I'd prefer real workloads like compiling code or tokens / s inference.
Yes, CUDA is their moat. And it's a very deep moat, filled with sharks, alligators, and mines. It will take a truly massive effort to unseat CUDA and NVIDIA as the dominant software/hardware tools for deep learning.

I'm curiously watching Intel and their OneAPI platform; but it just feels like they're starting from so far behind. And Intel hasn't exactly had a stellar few years on top of that.
I like to wear lots of colors, funky jewelry and patterns, bright pink lipstick. Friends have compared the look to Ms. Frizzle (the original). Combined with a generally chipper personality, it’s often not well-received by fellow engineers. I usually get along great with the business and PMO though haha
> Irish
> founded the United States

lol
> If you have a “large” SRAM that can be accessed in one cycle, that just means your processor is slow and/or consumes more energy than it should.

MCUs are in this category, lots of embedded stuff, including the two areas I'm familiar with: game controllers and lower spec'd wearables.

Very low power usage, CPU speed around 100mhz, so not too slow.

You can do plenty with 100mhz and SRAM!
So things like GDQ marathons would need to change or get special permission. GDQ is literally the only stream I've ever seen that directly embedded video advertisements for sponsors. Clearly that can no longer be done.

But Lets ignore that and focus on their explained 3% overlays being allowed, as some sibling comments mention. (Which weirdly is not mentioned in the TOS at all, but only supplementary material).

Let's look only at one aspect of their marathon, one that seems innocuous. They have a banner area at the bottom, that often has various stats or other information. Ocassionally it may show the events own logo. That is clearly fine. And sometimes it shows the charity's logo. Is that a problem? Well, if they received literally nothing from the charity, it would not be sponsored content, so being a big banner on the screen is fine.

However, I know that that PCF for AGDQ actually pay GDQ a fixed amount for running the livestream, to help partially offset production costs. Which technically makes them a sponsor, in addition to being the charity benefiting. (They make far far more from the event then they spend obviously.)

Whoops. Clearly that must go, I guess.

And I guess they cannot have bigger logos of other sponsors be put up on screen even briefly during breaks, except I guess if they do it by way of physicals carboard cutouts or similar, as there is no only a few seconds exception or anything like that ...
Show HN: Add Favicons to HN
Yes. Although it's damn hard to recruit a Spanish stay at home mom with a slightly twitching left eye who's too busy to participate to random studies and will receive this a gift for her 50th birthday.

It kinda makes sense that some of her traits would be covered inside the test pannel, but looking at the face unlock and the level of adjustments they're still doing, it doesn't look like they got nearly enough data before launch. And that's for a product that is selling in billions of units.
Yeah that's nonsense. They already have bootcamp.
A TS backend is inferior to a PHP backend merely due to available frameworks being night and day in favor of PHP.
> Chickens are arguably one of the most successful species on the planet right now.

The dinosaurs didn't die out, they just got a lot smaller.
Somewhat related tip: prepend LANG=C to many console commands such as grep to speed up many tools processing large files, as they will assume ASCII input (which is probably what you have in most cases)
I think it's important to leave room for beauty and aesthetics in men's dress, but that doesn't necessarily need to mean a suit and tie. Only very recently in history - say since around 1980 - has society decided that men's dress must be purely comfort-oriented and functional, with little or no thought given to shape, ornament, or aesthetic beauty.

I think that's a big loss, because beauty is an important part of the human spirit, and clothing is something we all have to wear every day, even if only for protection from the elements. A world where clothes are purely functional is a world where we're all dressed like Roman peasants.

Beauty in men's dress has always been a part of culture until very recently. Sure, not everyone could afford to dress beautifully, but the aspiration for men was there. We seem to have lost that aspiration of late, and I think that's kinda sad. I would call the state of men's dress aspirations today a lot of things, but "aesthetically compelling" is not one of them.
I don't think any of what you're saying really makes much sense.

Merely having a server doesn't mean SSR provides business-relevant benefits.
for context: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34746738
I wonder if this would work by simply using out-painting to preserve the black dots, to make a background, and then use in-painting on the dots with the condition that they stay dark
The acoup blog went into detail on this topic [0]. Central idea was that early steam power was so inefficient the only way it was worthwhile was for use in coal mines where the fuel was basically free. It took years of improvements to make the technology cost effective in other domains.

[0] https://acoup.blog/2022/08/26/collections-why-no-roman-indus...
Sounds like your job had a lot of velocity with lateral tragmorphicity in Q1, just in time for staff engineer optimization!

Nicely done. Here is ~$50 worth of stock.
> Has anyone tried Steam under Linux?

Through FEX, yes https://vt.social/@lina/110068264684987710

> I know rosetta doesn't exist under Linux

It does these days! https://developer.apple.com/documentation/virtualization/run...
It's too fragmented.

Express is actually pretty cool for basic microservices.

For anything complex, hell no.
Used it in multiple companies, never said "Wow this is great!" - always said "fuck this would be 10x simpler in REST".

The only benefit I have personally experienced is that since we have mobile apps more often than not with Apollo, having the graphql for both mobile _and_ web react is nice.

But with Phoenix Liveview that benefit quickly erodes for me. I say good riddance.
OTOH turtlenecks being ubiquitous would make it super convenient to hide evidence of debaucherous weekend activities.
The due process clauses of the 5th and 14th amendments apply equally to men and women, seeing as how both are persons.
Thanks! Macroexpanded:

Ruff: A fast Python linter, written in Rust - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34788020 - Feb 2023 (67 comments)

Ruff – a fast Python Linter written in Rust - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32666035 - Aug 2022 (46 comments)

Reposts are ok when a story hasn't had significant attention in the last year or so (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html) but as both of those threads were within the last year, the current submission counts as a dupe.

The intention behind that rule is to have a balance: it's good to re-discuss popular topics from time to time, and we also want room on the front page for lots of uncorrelated and unfamiliar things.
I think the button down should escape your ire - not gendered, the choice in which buttons to button can completely change the tone, more styling options expressed through sleeves and degree of tucking of the shirt.

I do find your statement

>Congresswomen get to wear these colorful and streamlined Star Trek getups, but all the men have to be in suits and ties

incredibly compelling however, your critique of the suit and the expected range of formal mens wear has struck a chord with me.
OpenLLAMA will be released soon and it's 100% compatible with the original LLAMA.

https://github.com/openlm-research/open_llama
When I read a post like this, I don't mind the article being written, or votes by those who found it interesting. Everyone's learning. What gets me is that there's no way to not make it show highly ranked. Moderation via comments after posts rank up doesn't scale.
What a heck of a great blog post. I learned a lot about jq from how he described the computational model and I’m keen to try it zq now, thanks!
Low value comments get downvotes - and most “funny” comments are about a zero on the funny scale (regardless that office space is fantastic).

The point of the guidelines is to help reduce low value comments and on that note - mentioning voting is against the guidelines https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html for the same reason “Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading.”
Like everything else in life, by using contextual clues and judging the content of the questions.

It's quite obvious when someone asks you questions with ill intent.
@boringuser2, I vouched for your now-dead sibling comment of 29 minutes ago, because I think you're on to something and I believe your argument should have voice in this discussion. However, even though I sympathize with your position, and even though I don't think your comment should be dead, it's very fighty and condescending. Even if you aren't technically violating any of the rules that I can see, the condescension gets very close to being a personal attack. I think you'd be more successful in voicing your argument if you toned it down a little (or a lot).
Apple’s new journaling app turns your iPhone into a digital diary
> Navy pilots are on record as eye witnesses for this stuff

Yeah!

I used to work with someone who was a Marine F/A-18 weapons officer (back seat guy; I may have the aircraft type wrong). He knew everything there was to know about air combat & ground attack, but outside that, he was a complete moron. I mean, he seriously believed that we stole aircraft technology from aliens, because "there is no way that humans are that smart."

Let's just say I have my doubts.
“csinc”, the AArch64 instruction you didn’t know you wanted
I think people can understand if you tell them their ear is a bit odd shaped, or their makeup throws the dectection off. But it will be weird to explain them their eye movement is really out of norm, especially after they paid 3500.
I'll just point out that college students papers are exactly the sort of thing these AI chat things also do. Take a body of preexisting material and distill it into an essay. Really seems to me this is moving the bar as to what counts as cheating rather dramatically.

Memory that pops up is Barton Fink being told to write a script for a wrestling film.

Also sort of topical in high school had a quiz on a short story that I had not read. But I had read some of the authors other short stories. So I started out with 'While I failed to read 'story title'. Based on the author and the title I think the story is about bla bla. And the teacher took off 2 pts for not reading the story first.
I've used the same 10% metric before. It's funny and I like it.
Every nazi also drinks water.
This is a great point. I'm really happy about Apple's plans, but I have a hard time taking it at face value that there's nothing to worry about here if there's resistance to putting that plan into the spec itself.

Because I start to get suspicious any time a company says, "we're not going to do X, but we absolutely refuse to commit in any meaningful way to not doing X."

There's an implication there. I feel the same way about syncing, honestly:

"Everyone is going to support 3rd-pary sync."

"Can we put it in the spec that they have to?"

"Well, that would be overreaching..."

I think there are a lot of people who have genuinely good intentions, but it still makes me pretty nervous. If we could just trust every company to magically work things out and be compatible with everyone, we wouldn't need industry specifications in the first place. I think it's appropriate to try and standardize the baseline mechanisms users should have to control their keys and preserve their privacy.
Here's an interesting video clip of Lex interviewing Pilot Ryan Grave [0], ~10 months ago (~27 mins. Note: not full interview).

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hT6av8ZFCks&t=184s
> appropriate her identity

Hmmm, what's the difference between homage and appropriation for things like this?