skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not only GUIs, entire operating systems.

Besides the early computing days, the 8 and 16 bit home computers were mostly Assembly.

Even if Amiga, Atari and Archimedes had their share of BCPL, C and Modula-2, MS-DOS was fully implemented in Assembly.
There are no problems with the browser. It's the PR surrounding it. Clickbaity tech news websites have been trying to ruin Brave's reputation while Brave users continue to enjoy a fully FOSS browser with the best privacy period.
I don’t know, blocking people off “your land” goes back centuries. Probably millennia.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclosure_Acts
> I wonder what sort of Orwellian means Amazon can bring to bear to counteract it

Fresh meat, is the answer in many cases unfortunately.
We see less of these kinds of problems the closer we are to a free market. A pure free market is not realistic, but sadly our current flavor of capitalism has headed far away in the opposite direction.
Keyword here is assumption. And it’s a pretty shit assumption if you ask me, that public land is somehow yours because you own the land next to it.

Fine the owner for having blocked access to the public land with chains. Uno reverse card.
I just tried a comparison of ChatGPT, Claude and Bard to write a python function I needed for work and ChatGPT (using GPT-4) whined and moaned about what a gargantuan task it was and then did the wrong thing. Claude and Bard gave me what I expected.
Does light experience time? (2014)
that route follows an ancient coastline - https://starkeycomics.com/2021/06/11/how-a-coastline-100-mil...
ABS improves your control in normal circumstances. There are (uncommon) circumstances where it will actually harm your ability to handle the vehicle, same as other mandatory systems like ECS and optional safety features like traction control. Some vehicles have ways to disable some or all of these safety features for control purposes.

The proposed rules include false activation tests, monitoring/reporting of unnecessary braking, and NHTSA retains the ability to order recalls if false activations are unreasonably common. It also includes a request for comment on whether manual disablement should be allowed at high speeds. Feel free to submit one if you feel strongly about it.
Maybe a dumb question but let's say they all pulled this stunt at once. All of the insurers. What happens? And what stops the insurers from dropping current CA homeowner policies?
> I have loads of family in South Korea, a country in near terminal population decline, and the reason I've always heard is "it's expensive to raise a child". But the real reason is, it's expensive to train a child to get into a top-3 university. Raising a child to adulthood is possible even in abject poverty.

Isn't the fact that mothers are expected to drop their career and 100% focus on their children also a factor? Women instead decide not to have babies at all so they can have a career of their own.
>It's so frustrating to yearn for basic features in VSCode only to be ignored for years

What is a "basic feature" to you is apparently not that to most people, certainly not to me. Just how important could it be to resize the tab height? And what would vertical tabs do that the open editors panel doesn't? I also don't follow regarding the menu bar -- that's the way all apps behave on MacOS? You can put it into fullscreen mode if you want.
How does it compare to OpenAI's GPT4? It's not listed in the table.
Prob. referring to this https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36134249
Maybe connected to “Clickless” iOS exploits infect Kaspersky iPhones with never-before-seen malware? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36154455
Calling time on DNSSEC: The costs exceed the benefits
Whoa - please don't cross into personal attack on HN! That's definitely not what this site is for: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

I think your actual complaint is that coderholic's posts mostly (if not entirely) are about his company. It's true that good community members post about things that interest them generally, rather than using HN just for promotion (this is in the site guidelines: "Please don't use HN primarily for promotion. It's ok to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the site should be for curiosity"). But it's also true that people sometimes end up posting like that because their startup is the main thing they have something to say about, and it's not some sort of nefarious intentional plan. Either way, the best way to get your point across is to be gentle and respectful. If you come out with guns blazing, not many people are going to react well to that!
There's still a state plan right?
None of these models are even close to GPT 3.5, let alone GPT4.
Very I interesting project. Thanks. I’m going to start using it for my job search. Great job!
70GB of RAM would cost around $150 these days depending on how you get there. 64GB (2x32GB) of DDR4 is around $140 then another 8GB stick would be around $15.

Used DDR3 ECC would be roughly half that.
Sometimes a break-loop is all you have.

But usually there is something around it. Typically a Lisp system can run several REPLs at the same time, one might be a break loop. You can define a function in another REPL and use it in the break-loop. You can define the function by loading code in a break-loop.

An interaction might be (here in LispWorks):

CL-USER 6 > (> (sin-x2 3) 0)

Error: Undefined operator SIN-X2 in form (SIN-X2 3).
1 (continue) Try invoking SIN-X2 again.
2 Return some values from the form (SIN-X2 3).
3 Try invoking something other than SIN-X2 with the same arguments.
4 Set the symbol-function of SIN-X2 to another function.
5 Set the macro-function of SIN-X2 to another function.
6 (abort) Return to top loop level 0.

Type :b for backtrace or :c <option number> to proceed.
Type :bug-form "<subject>" for a bug report template or :? for other options.

CL-USER 7 : 1 > (load "~/sin-x2.lisp")
; Loading text file /Users/foo/sin-x2.lisp
#P"/Users/foo/sin-x2.lisp"

CL-USER 8 : 1 > :c 1
T

A function SIN-X2 does not exist. There is an error and we get a break-loop. The break-loop is one level deep. All of Lisp is available in a break-loop: the compiler, the code loader, the evaluator, ... Lisp stays with the break-loop in the context of the error.

I define/write the function in a file and the load the file. Loading the makes the function available in the running Lisp.

Then I use the continue restart to try to find the function again -> the error is gone
I wrote about this in another comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36161277

I've come to believe this is what reaching carrying capacity is supposed to feel like. A gradual desire to have fewer kids due to stress, rather than an abrupt calamity that cuts of populations all of a sudden.
I think it's fair to say that if you can stage coups and install puppet governments then you have a fair amount of control.
If the fed raises the interest rates, my stocks go down in value. Do I sue the fed for my losses? Ranch owner logic.
With 4-bit quantization should take less than 40GB of VRAM/RAM.
I think they are talking about VRAM
That much good RAM in itself isn't super expensive. So does the rest of the hardware have to be particularly powerful?
I’m curious to know the real reason for the change. Is it related to the data they used for training?
What people want from entertainment is to be told where benevolent moral authority begins and ends, a story just requires potential for mass appeal and surprise.

It's hard for those of weaker constitutions to admit there is no alchemy to story writing / charisma from the perspective of the story teller and conman. They prefer to believe in soul and muse than dig deeper.

The wishful thinking Entertainment industry has landed on this fake news about individual AI bros wanting to watch themselves as heroes in hollywood's oh-so-valuable existing films as if that door slamming zinger lands. The desperation, if there is any, is for AI to create novel IP and scenarios in underserved genres like Chrome Lords: Cyberpunk Egypt not for stale content deepfakes. AI bros cause "creatives" major concern because they might find the typical western audience actually worthy of inspiration above all.

The most entertaining thing you'll see until AI is in every niche will be watching the old guard cat herders try to collar cultural relevancy again. And I really don't think they mind that, all glory to weakness.
He should work together and join up with all the other alternative reddit apps and create their own backend api that they all pay for pro rata according to how much data they use.
I briefly looked at prices a few days ago, I think you can rent an 80gb GPU for about $2.50 an hour. Then you just pay while you're using it.

Someone else might be better able to confirm the pricing, but in any case you don't need to purchase the hardware.
> if you were talking to me about something, and midway with no warning or other signal

This happens all the time in a social group setting though. Not much confusion ensues.
It’s not entirely clear what unit the number is in. Checked the manual and it’s a time-based distance to next car measure.
The confusion here is that some people realize they aren't "average". That is, while some policy or another is good on the whole, it can also be bad for them personally. For them, the chance of a wreck can actually increase. You're demanding that they sacrifice themselves to save imbeciles who probably shouldn't be allowed to drive anyway.

For such people, these policies suck. And it's strange that there are those that demand they either be happy about it, or at least be quiet about it.
Interesting, I’ve had somewhat similar experiences. Big one-time events were handled no problem. But chronic illnesses have always been a nightmare - for my daughter to get her meds, she pretty much has to have the same chain of conversations once a quarter with doctor, pharmacy benefits manager, and insurance. PBMs are the worst though, by far.
>I've often heard that a sites most "active" users seem to be women in their mid 30s. That's because those stats include the woman and the toddlers she hands the phones to.

Christ, man, I can literally see it, seen it tons of times, and yet ... just wow.
PostgreSQL isn't the only RDMS to chose from.
Chatting with Falcon 40B feels like chatting with GPT4, very capable model.
Keyd: Linux Key Remapper
I did about a month ago from last month’s post. I was in finance before and had a few offers from finance companies, but I had an offer that stemmed from last month’s post in a totally different field that seemed better. Very happy with it.
He also illegally put chains up to prevent access to the public land across the corner.

He also sent his ranch employees to harass the hunters while they were on public land. Clowns.
Take a look at FL, assuming it works similarly, both of your questions are answered.

Yes they can cancel you, and yes you'll be able to get insurance, but it may be prohibitively expensive.
Sorry to break it to you, but he was a pulp writer. The Three Laws aren't at all deep, they're shallow by design. They are presented in universe as being absolute and unbreakable, and inevitably they break, creating an apparent paradox similar to a closed room mystery, except in this case, the closed room is the supposed infallibility of perfect machine logic. It may be possible to explore them as a thought experiment but fundamentally they're a plot device.

In The Rest of the Robots, published in 1964, Isaac Asimov noted that when he began writing in 1940 he felt that "one of the stock plots of science fiction was ... robots were created and destroyed their creator. Knowledge has its dangers, yes, but is the response to be a retreat from knowledge? Or is knowledge to be used as itself a barrier to the dangers it brings?" He decided that in his stories a robot would not "turn stupidly on his creator for no purpose but to demonstrate, for one more weary time, the crime and punishment of Faust."[1][2]

“There was just enough ambiguity in the Three Laws to provide the conflicts and uncertainties required for new stories, and, to my great relief, it seemed always to be possible to think up a new angle out of the sixty-one words of the Three Laws.” (The Rest of the Robots, 1964).[3]

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics

[2]Isaac Asimov (1964). "Introduction". The Rest of the Robots. Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-385-09041-4.

[3]https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/253748/how-did-isa...
treating obesity like a lifestyle condition and not a bonafide disease and dismissing patients with vague recommendations to eat less and exercise more is ignoring the overwhelming body of evidence supporting that behavioral interventions don't work and that the body has strong homeostatic mechanisms which fight efforts to move the weight set point.

i can only hope that you're not a doctor
It has to be GPU RAM from my understanding, unless you're happy to wait several minutes/hours for each response.
OpenAPI uses JSONSchema to define object (e.g. request, response body) schemas, so it would be more accurate to say it:

Extracts the JSONSchema based on path+method+response type from OpenAPI and then converts that to typescript
maybe the comment was about safety related training leading to performance loss. Sebastien used the "Unicorn benchmark" to visualize such nerfing. Watch his talk at timestamp 26:22. Ref: https://youtu.be/qbIk7-JPB2c?t=1582
I'm on Arc. If you're ok with the url bar being visible where you want it to be visible — you can trigger it per-domain (tab?) then this is how it looks like when you enable Developer Mode for a "site":

https://shottr.cc/s/H7dA/SCR-20230602-dhd.png
Anything that runs on GPU can be run on CPU, the only question is how much slower it's gonna be.
No I don’t need it. And I am fine someone takes it. But using the word “need “ is just bs with some political leverage.
The author seems to argue that estimates are off because of "unknown knowns", and can be improved by adopting an estimation framework that makes these items more explicit.

While this is certainly valid I would add that in my experience the most influential causes of major shedule disruption were the "unknown unknowns", wich are inherrent in any new creation, but which are exacerbated in software because of the extremely high and fractal dimensionality of digital assets. The smallest deviation from assuption can have an unbounded impact on the plan, often popularly refered to as a 'butterfly effect'.
WunderGraph | https://wundergraph.com/ | Full-time | Senior Golang Engineer | Remote

WunderGraph is the BFF (Backend for Frontend) Framework. Our solution helps developers to manage the API Dependencies of their applications and create BFFs in no time. Our long term vision is to build GitHub for APIs, a collaboration platform for API creators and consumers.

At the core of our product is the "Engine", a Gateway/Compiler/AST Transformation Engine that translates between GraphQL, REST, Databases, SOAP, gRPC, AsyncAPI and more. Client Request -> AST -> Transformation -> Origin Request(s) -> Response Transformation.

This Engine allows our users to get one unified interface across all their API Dependencies, so you can easily use GraphQL or TypeScript (using our API ORM) as the "Frontend".

We're looking to expand our Engine Team to further improve the capabilities, add more possible data sources, like gRPC, Kafka, etc... Therefore, this job is not about creating web services and such, but rather deep dive into the world of ASTs, Transpilers, different API Protocols and such. I'm one of the founders (CEO) and would love working on this full time, but there's just so many other things that need to be done. We're currently 13 devs, with 3 focussing on the Engine.

Apply at: https://wundergraph.com/jobs/senior_golang_developer
As someone who has done both, I'd say that argument is wrong. It is much more convenient to index by code point. Indexing by bytes is almost always what you don't want to do, and leads to a lot of errors.
From what I can find online LLAMA-65B 4-bit quantized can run 1 token/s on a Ryzen 7 3700X (using llama.cpp).
Have you seen a Jackson Pollock in person? Seen the thick paint on canvas? It's magnificent without context.
That’s not what the number means. From the manual:

“Each setting corresponds to a time-based distance that represents how long it takes for Model 3, from its current location, to reach the location of the rear bumper of the vehicle ahead of you”

I think it might have been in the past, at least I was told the same thing years ago.

That said, it is actually an issue that it now keeps too much distance under some conditions on the lowest setting.
I think it depends on if you step on the land or jump across only using the airspace. In the US the land laws follow many British/Roman ancient laws.

A land owner doesn’t own the airspace above or the ground below. Only what they are reasonably enjoying and using. The airspace at this corner isn’t used by the rancher.

And now this specific right is codified in caselaw. It always existed just wasn’t spelled out for this specific purpose.
Appropriate response is for the state to offer insurance as competition instead of letting them try to coordinate extortion of us all.
I think people mostly talking about cases when insurance denies payments, so max out of pocket is not applied.
> There is no economic system that is sustainable where there are more elderly people not working / unable to work than there are young people who do work.

I don't think this is true. At the micro-economic level, it's not outlandish to see households where a working generation sustains not only their kids, but also their parents. At a macro-economic level, we'd certainly have to adjust our expectations of profits and growth, but that's because we are used to an always-growing economy.
Model has not changed. Prompt transformation code have changed.

So the same prompt you do are delivered to the model with a different "wrapper" prompt, significantly changing the answer model is producing.
You think the human history of art is a scam? Have you considered that you don't know the first thing about art history and would have to go back to cave dwellers' paintings to even have the first idea about what art is?
No, I mean your employer's payroll account, and their payroll processor's.
Most people assume that args are restricted to Lisp syntax and that args are evaluated, like in function calls. But inside a macro form this is not the case: the macro can implement a whole new syntax and semantic -> then to say the enclosed items are 'args' is misleading: it's source code in a new sublanguage with a different syntax/semantics. Technically the macro gets called with arguments, but only as part of the process of code transformation. For the user there can be a different syntax and semantics. The enclosed code then may have a different syntax where the (operator . args) syntax is extended or no longer used.

That also means that the simple (foo . args) pattern is now no longer valid inside the macro form and analyzing the source code of a macro form can be arbitrarily complex.

> The macros happens to be processing the lists in a non-linear way

Macros are code transformers. They get code as lists and return new code as a list. This generated code then is evaluated.

Different from functions, macros are not processing normal arguments and returning an evaluation result, but they are code transformers. The resulting transformed code is then run and it returns a value.

Thus we have two (interleaved) phases of execution, instead of one:

* the code transformation phase

* the evaluation of the code
Arc has been using this approach from the beginning — https://arc.net/gift/a192125e (here's an invite for whoever would like to try it out).

The more I think about it — the more Arc reminds me of an IDE. A browser IDE of a kind.
How do you feel about, say, The Fountain?
Maybe just my CV but none truly fit
Is there something CA is doing the lump all of CA and not just the people in the high risk zones? I mean a lot of east coast states have roughly similar flood/hurricane issues on the coast or flood plain areas right? And they pay out and let them rebuild in the same area? Forgive my ignorance on it.
Triangulation: iPhone 0-Day
Where I live, fuel, food, housing and other commodity prices are heavily controlled by a few central distributors. Those distributors are in turn controlled by, well, a few key corporations, including several levels of civil government.

New market entrants will conveniently be denied permits, or made to abide by the letter of the law, where other blessed groups are granted the grace of government officials looking the other way.

How is a new market entrant fuel distributor supposed to come in, when a single refinery exists to supply fuel? Same question, where a government monopoly sells electricity, how are we going to get competition?

Where I live, housing costs are triple or more in the city core as in the suburbs. But, gas prices are identical at every station, with zero apparent geographical variation! Same thing for grocery store prices, where food prices are identical in areas with 3x industrial and commercial leasing costs. For the gas, apparently, a tax on the commuters is what's balancing things out, but it doesn't add up.

What's more likely is that prices are being carefully centrally controlled, and have been for quite some time. And, this seems to be doing a great job of keeping inflation in check.

The above is not a criticism, just a statement of observation. The above scheme is working quite well for many people. It seems unfair to some.

Is there a formal economic theory that bases the generation of value off of the creation of economic inefficiencies? I definitely think we're there, and that the theory is correct. Efficient markets are not highly productive. What's highly productive is wasting a lot of energy and resources in various areas of activity. Where productivity means that you produce a lot. Wars, the Great Pyramids, "green" technologies come to mind.

Viewed this way, wage growth will happen if and when consumer spending is again considered to be a driver of economic growth. If we think that businesses are going to deploy cash more profligately than consumers, then cash will be (and should be) funnelled into businesses, so that they can drive economic activity.

For awhile now, Western consumers have been doing an awesome job of driving economic activity in other countries (exporting manufacturing economies). Western policy makers are super sick of this and it shows.

If you were given $100,000, what would you spend it on? And how would that drive further economic activity?
Seems like a textbook example of price controls causing a shortage and subsidies causing excess consumption.
Hi there,

This is Nitin from Plane. Your;s is an interesting take on project management tools. Quite understandably, no one can go out and try to solve everyone's problem. However, at Plane our methodology is "Tasks meet Methods", and we will try our best to do everything fitting in to this methodology.

We would love to see you try out Plane and share your valuable suggestions. Plane is new but its evolving quite fast.
"vr-goggles" doesn't sound that great either. on the other hand, alphabet could have "google goggles"
Of course, if you're using Oracle or DB2 you have other/bigger problems.
Python has strong typing which seems to be what you mean here rather than strict typing.

A "character" is not a well defined term in Unicode, rather the "base" that does not vary across implementations is code points, which is what Python measures when you get the length of a string.