skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> That's it. That is all that DNSSEC does.

Thus providing an interesting foundation to build upon, for example DANE or SSHFP. Not very known or common things, but they show the potential of what is possible when there's a way to publish cryptographically authenticated records in DNS.
The government could provide anonymous age credentials. A private-public key that neither the website nor the government can use to identify the user, but that confirms the user holds a key issued by the government verifying their age.
> but it should be a priority for everyone

It's not black and white, though. There are a lot of people who accept that some levels of sacrificing privacy is an acceptable price for security (i.e. street cameras that allow police to track a criminal who attacked you, plus add some deterrence value). The question, of course, is how to keep this sacrifice under checks and balances to prevent/minimize abuse, but that's another discussion.
HTTP3. The protocol name used in a lot of places is H3 (for example the alt-svc header)
David is art. This is advertising.

In the 1500s there wasn't really advertising and children wouldn't really become a target for advertising until the 1900s.

The flush toilet and bottled beer were both new in the 1500s, though, so you might imagine someone installing a giant beer bottle and toilet to guard their front door and tell the world to buy cool products.
The first amendment only applies to state actors. I’m not sure why it’s so frequently used broadly as a blanket for free speech in any context.
I've been wanting to use LO's flatpacks on my fedora for a while, but I recently gave up and resorted to using the distros' RPMs even though they often lack behind. Global menu, Hi-DPI and kf5 VCL theming just don't work from the official flatpak on my latest KDE+wayland. It seems that several issues are compounded across several stacks (flatpak, dbus, wayland, …) and I don't think there's actually any workaround that works for me.

I really hope they get to the bottom of that before dropping the distro's RPMs.
Followup -- It's fixed now.
0.2% is not "among the lowest in the world", or at least among OECD countries. Many countries have the rates way below 0.1% And not just rich countries, Brazil for example has 0.05%

https://www.oecd.org/els/family/HC3-1-Homeless-population.pd...
I once failed a job interview at the algorithms exam. I don’t know what it is, I’ve done great in other BSc-level math oral exams. Felt weird to have two teams at the employer, one that felt confident about hiring me, and another that thought I’m deeply incompetent.

Combine the scrutiny with a 3-6 month hiring process, I decided to dodge whatever that was.
Porn isn't mere nudity, and much of it is extremely violent. It is designed to flood the brain with dopamine. Brains, especially developing brains, which are constantly flooded with dopamine begin to produce less dopamine to offset the flood. Low levels of dopamine cause all kinds of psychological and emotional issues.
Its not just this issue. There are people that don't believe the world is round. Literally a belief about the shape of the planet we have actual photos of. People also have 'beliefs' about 9/11, moon landing, etc. Beliefs abound.
Additional tips on reaching out:

* Don't send a "Hi are you getting this email, reply to confirm and then I'll send over what you asked for, so that it doesn't go to spam" - just go right to sending the info

* Minimize the usage of GPT to fluff up your email. It's not a dealbreaker, but it's often pretty easy to tell, and generally all it does is make it harder for me to skim the email for things that aren't fluff.

* Write it in your personal honest style. This way the client can get a bit of a sense for you, and it's more likely to be a good long term match. "Write like you talk" - or write it in whatever style you'd use if you sent them a weekly update about what you worked on that week.

* In general, optimize for helping the client see you accurately, because this will help you find clients that are long term fits. You can obfuscate your style and then clients who might love you and want to work with you long term won't realize it, and clients that won't want to work with you long term might not realize that and then you've invested time into something that didn't become a long term working relationship.

* Consider including a Loom video where you introduce yourself, 30-180 seconds, a generic one - not a custom one for each client - have a project you worked on in the background and show it live.

* If you you don't have a style, consider using the HN style of concise and clear. Think of the style of HN - it's like craigslist. Clear, concise, barebones, and it works. That's kinda what I hope for when freelancers reach out to me. If I wanted long and fluffy I'd post on a forum that valued long and fluffy. But HN's style is more fast facts, bullet points.
> By the time of Tomb Raider (2013) she was replaced with a completely different person. Not even her signature braid was preserved. It was just some generic looking woman of a similar age.

And now she's also a literal mass murderer and the actual tomb raiding feels like an afterthought.
> To sysadmins, a program's output or its lack thereof is a vital part of its behavior

Isn't this why there are two output streams, stdout and stderr?
HDR sounds like a nice excuse rather than a genuine reason...
> mentioned Telehouse Docklands hosts LINX so you can get an unlimited transfer gigabit right into the Internet backbone

First, look at the LINX network map. They are not just in Telehouse Docklands.

Second, with all due respect, do you know anything about how the internet works ? "internet backbone" huh ?

LINX is a peering exchange. A connection to LINX gets you nothing. Sure you can peer with the route servers. But you won't find any Tier 1 routes on the route servers, and the Tier 1s will also refuse to peer with you because you're too small or you don't meet their ultra-restrictive peering policies (for example, good luck getting BT to peer with you !).

Most people are better off getting a good connection to either a Tier 1 or a high-quality Tier 2 network and leaving it at that.

> Also there is a cluster of data centers in docklands so they compete on price heavily

London Docklands is the most expensive place in the UK to colocate, and probably in the Top 5 most expensive globally. Its prime real estate, all of the big-name colo facilities know that and will charge you accordingly, ESPECIALLY Telehouse !

And trust me, you don't want to go anywhere near a "cheap" Docklands facility, they are cheap for a reason.

The days of £300 a month for a full rack in Docklands are long gone my friend.

There are many other perfectly good places both in the Greater London area and elsewhere in the UK and Europe where you will get more bang for your buck.
What are the American parents doing then? They just let corporations raise their kids and choose what they can see?
> I think this is a small step in the right direction

Yeah, I am obviously biased because I am a Red Hat employee but the truth is the Flatpak model makes a lot of sense for large desktop applications (LibreOffice, OBS, etc.) that anyway do Windows releases and therefore have to track vulnerabilities in their dependencies and release updates.

It may take a while to get used to it, but Red Hat has done a lot of infrastructure work to make this sandboxing possible (in RPM ostree, Flatpak, GTK+/GLib, PipeWire and many more places) and it's not a bad thing if they decide that the work is mature enough for them to reap the benefits.
> I'm kind of curious to know if anyone has thought about this or is interested in funding this?

I think we should distinguish between contributing work vs contributing money. Contributing open source and governance work is a socially rewarding and career-furthering activity. Contributing money (eg. computing resources) is almost always a rip-off.

Open source contributions and community work are great things and advance humanity. BOINC [2] is also a great example how volunteering computing resources can further science. The issue with contributing computing resources is that it drains the donor's economic resources without granting a tax rebate, but the recipient can use the resources to generate money for them. Bitcoin, TOR [1] and Bittorrent are such examples where participants volunteer computing resources which others profiteer off.

Since, I think, we agree on the work contribution part, let's focus only on the money contributions to such a system.

You'd eliminate resource abuse with a system where participants:

- contribute _spare_ computing resources

- are rewarded with credits

- can redeem those credits for future computing resources or currency

This system could be run by a central governance body or on a decentralised block chain.

[1] https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-trouble-with-tor/
[2] https://boinc.berkeley.edu/
Command-shift-? Brings up Search in the Help menu, then type and select the menu item, also, but TIL about raycast:

https://www.raycast.com
The law has far more power over corporations than society has over parents and parents have over children. We are better off doing what is most effective: regulate the industry.
“psychological safety” is a newish buzz term that is basically an excuse for people who can’t handle criticism or debate, which I am seeing as increasingly common among younger devs. It is and should always be ok to freely exchange ideas without fear of being wrong, because everyone can be wrong. Even Einstein was occasionally wrong.
I think the issue is more when other kids aren’t available. For example, you have to go to bank to speak to an advisor about something.
I created this a couple years ago, and I'm looking for contributions to improve it: both the code (it has undefined behavior due to my poor understanding of C types, and is msvc-specific), and the function (it passes SMHasher^0 but has many bad seeds, and some of the other results could be improved as well I think, such as, eg, MomentChi2).

Also the ECRYPT benchmark is 4x faster than Blake3^1.

0: https://rurban.github.io/smhasher/doc/BEBB4185.txt

1: https://bench.cr.yp.to/impl-hash/bebb4185.html

I could hack around with it but I have no firm ideas on how to improve these metrics, and I just wheeled it out on a whim, if anyone wants to try? I was thinking maybe adding an OR into the round function, something like:

state[0] |= 0b0000000000010000000000000

For example, just to add a bit of fixed input or whatever in each round, and contrast with the entropy of mixing, but this is untested and I have no idea how it would test in SMHasher. Anyway, just throwing this out there. If you wanna try, I recommend you fork SMHasher and develop the BEBB4185 code in there and see if you get better results!
So if this type of thing let's us dodge bullets, maybe nothing should change?
This question makes no sense. There is no distinction between and my mind, so experiences of the mind are by definition direct experiences.

Either way, if you're claiming I'm just a figment of your imagination, this conversation really makes very little sense, and of course there is no proof I can bring that would convince you. The existence of a world independent of our own minds is a pre-requisite for any meaningful conversation.
I was exposed to porn in 4th grade in 2001. Internet porn on the family desktop in the kitchen by 2003. My parents never stood a chance; I knew so much more about computers than they did.

It's a different animal for sure now. It had a subtle but very negative effect on my ability to start intimate relationships. I can't imagine what it would've been like if I was in highschool seeing OF girls on reddit. In the 2000s, there was a distance between the girls I knew and women I saw in professional porn. But now I know college-age women who have given OF a try. Definitely would have further warped my perceptions.
Monitor the resources, look for over-provisioning. I see a lot of that.

Use reserved instances rather than spot pricing.

Multiple tools/services in the space you describe.
- Defendants’ apps have created a youth mental health crisis.

Causality is really hard to establish, possibly impossible in this case. Nonetheless, there does appear to be a youth mental health crisis, and it arose around the time of the smart phone. https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/honestly-its-probably-the-phon...

- Defendants target children as a core market, hooking kids on their addictive social media platforms.

It certainly appears that way to me; but it would help to get actual documentation of intent.

- Children are uniquely susceptible to Defendants’ addictive apps.

There is a lot of science that says that teens are vulnerable to addiction; the dual systems view, a pretty influential perspective, is that sensitivity to reward (particularly social rewards) increases dramatically in adolescence, but cognitive control lags; this leads to an increase in exploration vs exploitation, which is adaptive, but risky. I think they are on strong ground here.

- Defendants design their apps to attract and addict youth.

Like the last, documentation of intent would be the best thing for the case.

- Millions of kids use Defendants’ products compulsively.

This is probably true. Adults too. Defense is going to say that its up to parents and guardians to police the use of these apps. That argument didn't work with cigarettes and alcohol, so I'm guessing won't work here eitehr.

- Defendants' defective products encourage dangerous "challenges."

This is true

- Defendants' defective social media apps (a) facilitate and contribute to the sexual exploitation and sextortion of children, (b) and the ongoing production and spread of child sex abuse material online.

I've denoted one as (a) and one as (b). (b) is undoubtedly the case. (a) is more culture-war-y, but its hard to argue that a lot of the viral video content is not sexxed up*

* I'm no prude, but find it annoying that 90% of the reels that Facebook suggest to me are sexual in nature, and that the sexually arousing nature of the suggested videos grabs my eyeballs. I mean, it works. But, I don't want those kind of distractions when I'm scrolling to see what friends and family are up to. Oh look, my sister took her kids to the beach. Oh look, that couple is simulating sex on a picnic table! Oh look, Mom got her first ripe tomatoes!
> the sky is the limit: with all the layer stuff.

Some techniques I've liked / made use of (although I support may vary depending on the tool you use):

- Using tap-hold to put Shift/Ctrl/Gui/Alt on home row underneath fdsa (and on the right-hand side, too).

- "Caps Word", where CapsLock functionality is enabled until a non-[A-Za-z0-9_] letter is input.

- Having a 'combo'/'chord' where pressing 'cv' or 'm,' would take me to the previous/next virtual desktop.
Flathub is a single point of failure and flatpaks can also have security issues that go unfixed. Its not some kind of miracle from God or something
Just for my understanding: That wouldn't help, right?

- It doesn't change storage costs

- It doesn't decrease the cost of a full exit

- They already have a CDN in front of it which reduces the traffic by a factor of 60.
Is there anything that reaches the power of Karabiner Elements + Keyboard Maestro on Linux? (e.g., where application specific remapping is not experimental)
Why do these brain stimulation experiments always seem to result in some sort of benefit? Do these things ever result in a loss of capability?
That’s a lot of hand waving for such a short post. I don’t disagree with the overall idea being presented, but I feel like there was more potential here.

Why 77% exactly? Surely that number must depend on other factors?

How do you measure this number, are there resources online?

What industries are currently at 50, 60, 70 and 80%? so we may not only compare and contrast, but end up with an idea of what the future might look like.
Personally, I would not enjoy working for someone who was annoyed by me asking questions. Questions mean someone is interested in it, and is paying attention. To learn about something is to invest effort into it; it’s a great sign. Anand dodged a bullet here IMO.
The comments section on marginalrevolution is complete drek, though. I do appreciate the stories, but have to be better at avoiding the comments.
I read the whole comment. The implication was that it wasn't really disabled because at some point it was enabled.
This needs to be repeated 100 times. People in Moscow and Sankt Petersburg to an extent were the elite and had much better living standards than those from smaller cities. Better loving, better education, better healthcare, less shortages, more access to goods.
There are a lot of you statements in this rant.
It reads like a junior sysadmin who just learned (or failed to learn) an important lesson about using >/dev/null 2>&1 at the end of commands in their scripts (or, even better, how to push output to a log file with the logger command or similar)
How does that idea fit with real-world China which runs a state-capitalist economy under an authoritarian communist rule?

You are right though that authoritarianism seems to be a pre-condition both for communist and fascist regimes.
> MitM upstream from resolver

And even this part is also mostly solved by DoH. (Unless someone can mitm you and spoof certificates, which means you're targeted by some organisations with serious resources...)
That sounds tough, especially as kids.
It's absolutely beyond me that you can't block a YouTube channel.
Pre-consumerist russia had incredibly colorful dresses: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=traditional+russian+dress&t=ffab&i...

If anything it's the communists that turned everyone into a gray mass, mostly because you had a very limited number of items of clothing that the state manufactured and you could buy, and the state decided on the color, and second because standing out in any way was at best frowned upon, and at worst dangerous, especially during stalin's times.
It's not "my theory" ;)

Myopia is usually caused by a combination of lifestyle and lens use. For example looking at a phone 33.33cm away is equivalent to wearing a -3 lens and looking into the distance.
> If you want to print deprecation warnings for something, the system administrators of the world will thank you if you make it not the default behavior. That way people who actually care can check when they want to (or run in checking mode all the time), but you won't cause pain for others.

And so that they can have an excuse to say they have not been informed of the deprecation and call you names. Seriously, this basically amounts to never deprecating anything at all.
The font is unreadable.

Also, there's a mistake here in structuring.

Who's the audience ?

With beginners, you, as a mentor, should NEVER introduce too many concepts in a lecture, it's too much to the negative impact on the brain.

Make things concise, one at a time. In this case, you should split this book into many mini-books, each one focus on one level of audience instead.

Beginners in any fields would appreciate you if you can just bring smallest enough concepts to master for them to self-learn through your exceises instead.
This is interesting, but not surprising when you think about it. My whole career I've noticed there are always people who think as soon as a problem is mentioned, it needs an instant solution - and they are quick to volunteer one. Others say "Hold on a moment, let's back up and start from the beginning". They are calm and methodical and careful to withhold their conclusion until all data is gathered, and have removed the impossibilities from the possible solution set. They usually are the ones to solve the problem in the end I've noticed.
Location: Istanbul, Turkiye

Remote:Yes

Willing to relocate: Maybe

Technologies:Python, TensorFlow, PyTorch, Ivy, AWS, Azure, MLOps, APIs

Résumé/CV: I worked mostly in data roles with leading responsibilities in SaaS startups. Detailed CV will be sent on request.

https://bento.me/huseyinevecen

Email: huseyin@evecen.com
SEEKING WORK | Remote | UTC (Lisbon based)

15+ years of experience

Full stack development

Experience range from migrating applications from monoliths to microservices and building new backend services as APIs to building frontend applications from scratch.

Rate: flat, negotiated on project basis.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipebn

https://iamfelipenascimento.dev/
I don't read every line of code but yeah. I think I spend more time reading code for curiosity's sake than actually using many programs. I absolutely read build system scripts, I won't run make until I know what's gonna happen.

I also enjoy stracing random programs in order to figure out the exact set of system calls they're making, in which order and with which parameters.
No! But a lot of non-qualified-customers talk up the benefits of going fully open-source, so I take your point it may not be the best audience to be taking advice from? That's a nice idea about code escrow (although I'm slightly troubled by the incentives it creates ha ha!) -- had never heard of that. Do you have any links?

Cost to host should be OK, it's basically fire and forget, ignoring any customizations. Requires a bit of expertise if you want to modify things, so maybe that's an issue?
Not a lawyer, but I think you are right that the case will end up hinging on this; my guess is that the argument will be that having a whole bunch of messed up social-media addicts at school is disruptive to the educational environment, preventing them from fulfilling their mission.
> The tool may save the developer, let's say 3-4 hours / week

This is the main flaw in your argument. For any developer who will actually save 3-4 hours a week with this tool, there are a thousand developers who will only save 3-4 hours a year.

As a potential user, how do you know which group you’ll be on?

And as business, how do you make the decision to only target one in a thousand potential users?
Not the OP but I would say: yes exactly. A culture where you only see team members presenting ideas in their done state leads to overall worse solutions because people aren't collaborating & giving each other feedback on ideas-in-progress.
Reminds me of this emphatically best middle school

Fuqing #1 Middle School

https://g.co/kgs/HPtt5n
>When you start an open-source project ...

Rubbish.

Its nothing to do with "start-up" or "open-source project".

As I clearly said. Its Dummies 101 ... if "somebody" is giving me money, then only an idiot doesn't consider what happens if that "somebody" stops giving me money.

Its not rocket science, its basic planning.
Who are they're going to sue next? City planners for their contributions to social problems?
Can you elaborate on how it would have warped your perceptions?

From what I can see, todays porn is no longer an ideal but more reflective of reality, to the point where people that one interacts with in daily life could have produced it (e.g. OnlyFans).

For example, for me when I was in high school/college Playboy ran a series called Girls of the ACC where they recruited contestants from our local state school. This was over 20 years ago, and to me isn’t so different from the effect of OnlyFans, letting “normal” people participate in pornography.
Bespoke RPMs that have to be patched and modified for distros by a small group of maintainers have issues too.
Anyone that is mildly evolved with SecDevOps knows how much of theory that happens to be in practice.
Obviously the persons mentioned had considerable knowledge to start with. But the key to their accomplishments is that they built something then iterated on it.

For example initial work on Linux was based on Minix and then refined and evolved on the basis of experience. 30+ years later Linux is still being developed, refined, evolving as hardware platforms change, bugs fixed, new drivers added, etc. By Linus's original announcement, Linux started out as a tinkerer's prototype. There was no grand plan to start with. More like curiosity and wanting to address a personal itch.

As an engineer you learn by doing. Experience is the best teacher.