skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
360 deaths is noise.
Forward emergency braking systems don't detect such situations. You'd be hit regardless. They only have a 170 degree field of view at the best of times in their current implementations. Somebody two hundred feet away closing at sixty miles an hour will hit you in the side regardless of forward emergency braking simply because it's not designed to look for something moving that quickly that far away at that extreme of an angle.

That said there's also a balance in safety systems between personal responsibility and systems responsibility. Relying too much on systems responsibility actually causes more harm because the person becomes more careless or is entirely at the whim of the system responsible for their safety. We put railings on stairs in public places but don't require everyone to put on a safety harness and latch it onto the guide to climb stairs for example. There's an expectation that system safety has hit a reasonable limit and the safety harness is too costly in time, money, and attention to implement.
It isn’t legal. See the Inclosures act of 1885.
So are you telling me it's not guns that shoot people, it's people that shoot people!?!?!?!
What would George Carlin say?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-ryuJDTpEc
I think there is one other aspect to consider. Over here at least, generally if someone rear ends you it's always their fault. The law says they were not maintaining a safe following distance. So from the perspective of the manufacturer they would probably say such mistakes should not by themselves cause problems unless someone else is breaking the law, no different to a human tapping the brakes because they thought they saw a kid about to run on the road but it was just a jacket stuck on a tree.

You should be safe and free to brake without deep introspective thought, without fear of causing an accident. The real world is not that simple but that's how the law is generally setup.

And as a further point they'd probably say that if that person following had such a system, there's also less chance they'd rear-end you in turn. I was wary of the systems in my own car, but after 6 months of driving they are far more reliable than I'd feared and I'm quite impressed.
Archived page
https://archive.is/ywSwv
>Questions have been raised about whether Boeing will remain committed to the Starliner program, which is already a money loser. The company is contracted to fly six missions for NASA after certification of the Starliner vehicle, which will only occur after the crewed flight test. Boeing has already received much of the $4.2 billion from NASA in milestone awards, so it presumably would have to give some of that money back if it did not fly astronauts for NASA. But the cost of flying those missions may be greater than any funding Boeing would have to pay back to NASA.

Makes you wonder if Boeing is purposely finding more issues to try and get the program canceled.
I'd say 20th century Berlin always was an island of craziness. In the roaring twenties, it became both a poorhouse (hyperinflation) and the city with the wildest parties and openly queer communities. After WW2 the story is that the Allies made sure that Berlin would be barely governable. In times of the iron curtain many many left-wing Germans who didn't want to serve in the military escaped to West-Berlin which was known as a safe harbor. And in the 90s from what I can see, it looked like a big techno party.

So all in all, I think Berliners old and young are pretty fine with craziness and some kind of "governed anarchy". Only recently (to me at least and from what I heard for other people as well), it became really annoying because the government seems completely overwhelmed by pretty much everything. Berlin is btw still said to be the "capital of unemployment" and recently the housing problems and gentrification reached another absurd level.
I found this book pretty unconvincing, with way too few sources and way too many flimsy inferences.

However, there is a great book about CIA guys creeping around Laurel Canyon, called Chaos [0]. It's filled with sources, research, and mostly solid inferences.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHAOS:_Charles_Manson,_the_CIA...
What do you people DO that you are doing tasks like this? I've always loved FP from college, but never ran into problems like this that would actually warrant using one
Yes. And, once more with feeling: https://xkcd.com/297/
No. And this is a common trick the government has used. Have a friendly party bring a suit and then refuse to defend effectively to force the judge to rule against. That’s how prop. 187 got nuked.
If we care about reducing following distance, we should be lowering speed limits. A car doing 60 needs a much longer safer braking distance than one doing 45.

Also, if you are following at a distance where an AEB activation will cause you to rearend the vehicle in front of you, you are too close to safely follow any vehicle, regardless of whether it has an AEB.
People are assuming this drop was caused by the API footshot, but I think it's the other way around.
Hunting preserves are increasingly common throughout the west and are mainly where these disputes arise. Some of the largest landholders in the west, for example Ted Turner, are mostly in the business of buying cattle ranches and converting them to hunting preserves.

I don't think this case is very constructed at all, as many similar disputes have played out in my region, but generally they don't make it to court... they end up either as hunters getting run off and not returning, or the BLM district supervisor sending nasty letters to get gates unlocked, or an argument mediated by the sheriff where everyone leaves unhappy. What's unusual about this case is that it has a very clear and well-documented set of facts that makes it an almost ideal test case for the issue of corner crossing, and both public land advocates (which range from the owner of OnX who is involved in this case to many other political lobbying organizations) and landowners looking to retain the ability to restrict access to their adjacent public land stand to benefit. The well-documented set of facts here are not that surprising as this is a well-known issue in hunting circles and there are quite a few people who document their means of land access very carefully in order to defend themselves in a situation such as this.
What laptop GPU? I tried to tone it down a bit for iGPUs but I may need to tweak it more. Sorry about that. Runs smooth on our 2019 MBPs, iPad minis, and iPhones, but I know that’s not a big test pool. It’s a webgl fragment shader, so it’ll be GPU-heavy, not CPU-heavy.

(I wish there was an easy way to disable the shader based on GPU specs…)
Wonder what kind of database it's going to take to store all of the virtual worlds people create.
I can't count the number of flowers AEB has prevented me from murdering. But at least in my equiped vehicle, the nuisance activations haven't been dangerous, and most of the events in traffic have been reasonable, if overly conservative. During parking, less so, but at least predictable.

Having AEB without being aware of it is probably not ideal. If it activates improperly and you didn't know it was there, that's twice the disorientation. It was really jarring the first couple times, and if it was on a wet bridge while turning in a narrow lane, that wouldn't be pretty as others have discussed.
TikTok Influencer Used Bitcoin to Launder $420K in Covid Relief Loans
This is not a complaint!

From your comment history I can see the same role has been posted every month for over a year now.

Can you shed any light on that? Maybe there anything very specific you are looking for and should add to the post? Surely by now you must have had a very large number of candidates that match exactly what your current text is asking for.
This sounds kinda fake to me. Like, how did the AI have a concept of an operator, or the operator's physical location, or comms equipment used to communicate with the operator, and how did it game out the consequences of destroying the operator or comms equipment? It would need an extremely sophisticated model of the world that's well beyond anything GPT-4 evidences.

I'd guess the "AI" was another human in a wargame, not an actual AI.
It's not that hard to install a caching plugin that essentially serves your entire site from static files. Nor is it that hard to put it behind a load balancer.
Well to the extent one's news sources are determined and pushed/suggested by algos based on profiling that's passively accepted by user, then yes op's claim applies.

News sources are unfortunately becoming quasi identity issues. Think fox v. CNN v. Npr listeners. Having one adherent meet an opposing adherent is like the pope meeting an atheist.

News could also help itself:

- cut out sensational headlines

- knock off jibber jabber. Both fox and CNN give news then turn it over to a panel for comment. Leading questions attempt to sensationalize with: in your 20 years have you seen anything like this? How bad is it?

- be more like Cspan who do not dabble in entertainment masquerading as news eg tucker Carlson or Limbaugh

Users can help themselves:

- stop confusing panelists with real. Don Lemmon, Hannity, and Carlson hold no office and don't vote on issues.

- read: the best sources of analysis are in written form (economist, scmp, foreign affairs, new Yorker, Atlantic journal, and books). All that work requires an attention span to write and read

- stop being used and then blaming on somebody else!
The land owner was an idiot to let this go to trial.

He'd been a lot richer if he constructed a private road and charged a toll. He'd have defacto control of who crosses and it'd be quite profitable too.

Instead he got caselaw against him and is left with nothing. Lesson about greed here!
How meta can you go? I proposed a taxonomy here: https://alexshroyer.com/posts/2022-04-30-Fantasy-Fantasy-Foo...
For the working class (most applicants), we're here just for the salary. We're not here for prestige, or asslicking, or passion. We're here to put food on the table and to potentially build for our children a future where they don't have to sell their time for money.
Yes, that's the picture they are trying to paint. Rather successfully it would seem.

Providing facilities, medics, dietitians, etc. does not hurt, of course. Makes for great PR. Having your guys in charge of testing for dope helps create the actual results, though.

That said, if you truly believe superhumans exist, that's fine too. Even if it strikes me as rather naive. It helps patriotism and whatnot. A man needs his pride
I can believe that the core GPT-4 model itself has not changed, but clearly they've changed some features. They've added plug-in access, which can change GPT-4's capabilities greatly with some chats.

The over all UI of the web site has changed several times (dropdown for GPT-3.0/3.5/4.0 turned into a GPT 3.5|GPT 4.0 button, they added the ability to share chats, and I'm sure there are other small details).
This would basically necessitate moving every shared fence in the world.
At the very least it sounds like people will benefit from actual tests and requirements about how the braking system must act.
quest just doesn't have a game library offering that compares to the switch. plus the switch is way less of an investment to get into a gaming session. (and I say this as a quest owner) to play my vr headset, I have to clear the room, calibrate my play space and the games just arent there. there's nothing in it that matches super mario galaxy or legend of zelda. I usually jsut play a few rounds of beat saber and call it a day
EXACTLY!

Modern art (and unlikely any other type of art) was not created as a psy-op. That is mere clickbaitery in headline writing. It was used, like other cultural exports, as one of many aspects of promoting US values and position.
> So privacy is now an ethical question but not a human right?

Privacy is a human right precisely because of its weight in the question of ethics. I would hazard against playing false-dichotomy games, for they can only be lost, never won. I would say that your error appears to be in giving undue primacy to legal definitions over other kinds as holding some kind of authority. It is true that governments use laws to justify their violent actions but I don't think that gives them any more metaphysical weight over other forms of judgment. (To anticipate a quibble: judgment is inherently metaphysical, to claim metaphysics is irrelevant is to claim opinions are irrelevant and we get nowhere on questions of ethics and rights.)

> Historical precedents no longer matter, so we as a humanity can again commit all the atrocities of the past?

This is such a perversion and misinterpretation of what I said that I'm struggling to see your response as anything but a troll's. Regardless, I will continue.

> we ("people") should be especially worried about technologists eager to define what is ethical and trying to overcome laws with their own interpretations

I agree -- the direction we both seem to be advocating for, then, despite your insistence that we argue about it, is that neither laws nor random technologists can define ethics for the entire society. It must be a bottom-up process of popular, consensual decision-making, as has been demonstrated in the past through mass political (dare I say populist) movements. There is no ethical way for a small group to impose such things on the populace without their input and control in that process.

> the interplay between ethics and law

This is just another variation of the "historical precedent defines ethics" argument, which has already been addressed.
https://slate.com/technology/2013/10/traditional-chinese-med...

"Traditional Chinese Medicine" as we now know it was invented as a propaganda move by the CCP under Mao, who didn't believe in it himself.
It’s pretty easy to point <hostname>/docs to an appropriate server. This is literally what Stripe does. There is no need to merge the marketing site with the API or docs.
Do you have any feedback on Ghost? How do you like it? Any room for improvement?
> and punish people who actually pay attention on the road.

It can benefit people who have reaction times slower than silicon.
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Remote: Open to it, flexible
Willing to relocate: Open to it, flexible; can work in EU too
Technologies: embedded Linux (C, C++, Python, bash...), Linux-based infrastructure & tools, browsers internals (former WebKit committer), native Apple platforms (macOS, iOS), web backend (Python based, eg Flask)
Résumé/CV: please ping hello@sempliva.com
Email: hello@sempliva.com
I was so excited to see this happen!

I'm not a customer of yours, but your blog posts inspired me a lot. Your journey through quitting caffeine is a great and heartening read.

I've got two things to say;

1) Will you consider source-availabling the web portal (app.keygen.sh) too? Some enterprises could use it for easy management/support for customer's licenses. Although now that I think about it, it could also discourage custom, more suitable implementations for each use-case... I'm torn on this one. I would like to see it available on GitHub just out of curiosity too. It's very beautiful.

2) For a team + customers' chat, I cannot recommend Zulip enough. It's a joy to use and has the most innovative chat system I've ever seen. https://zulip.com

I hope your business keeps prospering!
> But the net effect of this setup is that "big private ranches" are effectively illegal in Wyoming

No they aren't. All the private ranch owner has to do is purchase the land from its current owner. IE the government.

A private ranch can't steal that land from the government though, through some complicate surround maneuver, like from the board game "Go", of course.
When looking to expand your dataset, aim for diversity - not just in terms of race, but also in terms of the hospitals and x-ray/diagnostic equipment used.

Examples of models failing when a dataset collected from one hospital is applied to another are well known.
Rule is the same in (at least some jurisdictions of) the US. Google easement by necessity if you care to know more.

Trouble in this case is the public owns the BLM land, right? So they would be the ones entitled to an easement and they have not sought one. Perhaps they should.
I haven't looked at it closely this time around, but I recall from the previous time looking at it and there is already access to the public parcel from the other side, it's just wildly inconvenient if you're on this side but you, i.e. don't "need" an easement to get there. Something like that, I hope I'm remembering it right.
Arc is way ahead on browser UX. Opening links in Pinned Tabs into a modal over the Pinned Tab content is exactly how I want to use link aggregator sites
Meanwhile here I am, using an ultrawide 21:9 monitor and loving it as I can easily split it in two or three columns whenever I need. I don't understand why people like squarish monitors so much, the human FOV is not square.
There's a long, well documented history of the CIA injecting unknowing, innocent people with various drugs for tactical and experimental reasons. That seems pretty evil and anti-American (really, anti-human)!
a) not true
b) not true
c) not true
d) not true
e) a lot of people have no idea json support exists in PostgreSQL.
Deposits from Chase via ACH happen overnight for me and are available for withdrawal pretty much as soon as they land in Apple Savings.
Why so rude?
Building and Using Generative Models Under US Copyright Law
so did Amazon starting July
Bah bum hahaha thank you
hi! would you guys be open to any Software Engineering Internships for this summer?
On the file system, it is stored as "Toad/ The Hoppening", in OS X it is displayed as "Toad: The Hoppening"
It's frightening to realize that western society has had such powerful totalitarian elements working behind the scenes under the banner of free markets and meritocracy. No wonder everything feels fake.
I believe they mean shift-cmd-c and it copies the current URL to the clipboard. Comparable to cmd-L + cmd-C in one keystroke.
Damn, i just want to commend you on the immense amount of research you've done and your rightful confidence of the ailments effecting your body. I have been half heartedly studying my autoimmune disorder for a while but trying to study that while also devoting all of my time to physics degrees is very difficult. I did do some cancer research while my mother was dying but again, i could never approach the actual knowledge of the specialists she was seeing and she didn't want me to worry in the appointments to ask questions. I hope someday to have the incredible knowledge and sourcing that you have as well as the genetic information you've gathered.

Out of curiosity, how did you get your genetic information? Do you have a full set (i forget what they call that) or just a specific part relevant to your research? Thanks
The car doing the T-boning can see forward, and even slowing down by 10 mph can halve the lethality of the resulting crash. Full success isn’t necessary for benefits.

Or sub in a high speed rear-ending scenario.
Then maybe we should focus on the education around this instead of prohibition.
As a sibling post said, this is not that accurate, all told. I specifically remember similar argument against anti-lock brakes when those were first made.

To your credit, I have never heard anyone say bad things about rear view cameras. It is scary how many lives that has to have saved by now.

Now, I have heard complaints on cruise control. I don't see that going away any time soon.
This is a rather interesting take as Meta is simultaneously laying off hordes of people, telling the world that virtualized collaboration is possible/ready, and asking people to spend more time at the office.

I’m sure there’s some degree of having a job, and it being a down economy, but there seem to be a lot of reasons to not work for Meta
Mine was with Wells Fargo - trying to get automated withdrawals from Apple Savings to Wells.

I decided to try again today, we'll see.
I do wonder how much longer Reddit can continue. Based on the numbers I can find, it doesn't look like they're making very much in the grand scheme of things. The best estimate I found was $350M in 2021.

Their operational costs and overhead must be very high given the amount of traffic they get (~#18-20 worldwide according to Similarweb) and the amount of data they have to quickly serve. I can't imagine you are anywhere near break even with the infrastructure and operations they need plus company overhead.

If true, the API changes definitely seem like a way to try to generate a new income stream that doesn't "take away" something from the base platform that users used to have for free (like Twitter Blue).

Seems like a pretty safe play from an investor point of view until you realize that the third-party developers using the API in the first place to build alternative clients are not multi-million dollar companies that can afford the API rates. I don't know who out there is using Reddit data that could pay the proposed rates and still be profitable. There just can't be that many of them for this play to make sense.

It's easy to see what will happen. Taking away a method to access your platform that your users are comfortable with (i.e., BaconReader, Reddit is Fun, Apollo, etc) will lead to a good number of those users abandoning the platform, others moving to the official app begrudgingly, and the net effect will be that all of the users are unhappy and Reddit will likely not be earning enough from their API to make it all worth it.

And through it all their official app will probably stay untouched or barely updated.

Or maybe they'll buy the most popular cross platform client and retool it to be official.

I honestly don't know why they never tried to monetize their subreddits. Imagine a monthly fee for:

- Additional moderation tools
- Additional design tools (i.e., force old design forever)
- Slotted template layout for more design flexibility
- More moderator slots, more flair, etc
- Built-in highlighted community member feed at the top of the subreddit -- who in the community is live right now on YouTube, Twitch or Reddit, etc. Imagine the Final Fantasy 7 Remake subreddit having some of the mod team do a live head-to-head speedrun race streamed live in the subreddit.
- Custom emotes like BTTV/7TV on Twitch, etc).
- Dedicated account manager to help handle brigading when the topic of the subreddit has a bad day in the news cycle and 4chan is bored and starts spamming the sub.

The larger communities would definitely buy into that.

Some of these features could also be added to a monthly user subscription too. For example, you could get a handful of awards you can give out to posts as part of your sub (like Discord Nitro gives 2 server boosts).

Official subreddits could also be a thing -- imagine Xbox paying a few grand to make it the official subreddit and gain direct access to Reddit Admins, better tools for managing customer complaints and support tickets directly from the platform, lots of user metrics and data, etc.
Really needs a code of conduct...
Are you talking about emergency braking or lane assist?

We've disabled lane assist on our car as it seems to always take the wrong action, but we've never had an issue with the emergency brake which is the subject of the article.
Thanks. Apparently Brave can use Chrome extensions. The more you know.
Taylor, Fiona, et al. “Statins for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2021, no. 9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004816.pub5.

Page 11.

If you have an account at Cochrane: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD...

If not, just get it from LibGen with: 10.1002/14651858.CD004816.pub5
Yea that is very tough to believe
Seems like such an obvious solution. Almost free to implement for websites, just return a “content-rating” header, instead of having to integrate with a costly ID verification system.

Only downside is that it doesn’t make it easier to track people /s