skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Names can have different meanings based on context, even within pure mathematics. I think a mathematician would have little trouble discerning which kind of tensor is meant, as this sort of reusing existing terms is pretty common.

Just calling it an array might be underselling it, at this point. Perhaps a tensor in the context of CompSci is just a particular type of array with certain expected properties.
> you have to admit the emperor is at least wearing a thong

And a lot of people are getting turned on by it.
I don't think many people will claim 150k is market price for a staff engineering position in NYC. But it is more than enough to live in Manhattan. Full stop.

If MoMA or another non-profit offers you a salary than fails to support your lavish lifestyle: don't accept it. Hope that helps.
Man Guilty to Federal Charges Scheming to Obtain $1.2M in Covid-19 Loans
Yeah I’m having the same experience. The replies have gotten faster in the last few days, at the expense of quality.

It’s noticeable because I used to be able to read each word as it was printed from the GPt-4 output, but now it goes far too fast for me to keep up with.

Kinda sucks to not have transparency at all into the black box, they’ve strayed so far from “open” at this point that it’s comedic
this is dangerous because then a rogue piece of content in your wordpress instance can exfiltrate user cookies. subdomains are much safer, if worse for SEO.
Does that mean Reddit's valuation for Fidelity is 6B? (given they evaluated it at 10b in their round).
Nowadays there's bitcoin/etc, so art/collectibles as value store are taking it on the nose.
And then a malicious/compromised plugin has access to your primary sites cookies. I think that’d be worse for SEO.
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Remote: preferred, open to hybrid

Willing to relocate: no

Technologies: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, MySQL, MongoDB, Postgres, Kafka, Kubernetes, GCP, Docker, Go, React

Résumé/CV: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gHvZDFKk6wV7E103BmBwy-dgmSM...

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/klfregoso

Github: https://github.com/klfregoso

Email: kathyfregoso [at] gmail.com

Software engineer with experience building and designing scalable, production-ready, data intensive systems in the realms of marketing and ecommerce. I am also the creator of QMantis (https://qmantis.co), an open-source observability solution for GraphQL APIs. I am seeking a full-time, remote software engineering role. I am eager to work at a company or organization that values professional and personal development, inclusion, work-life balance, and that fosters a culture of transparency.
To be fair it’s not a good comparison. An F1 car is , all things considered, an incredibly safe place to be in.

Certainly safer than your average road car in most circumstances.
Here is another alternative I found https://cloudtorrents.com
It’s magic! But it’s also wrong a lot. These days if I ask anything important I’ll also have to Google the answer and I’ll also ask chatgpt if it’s sure about some of the details
The last days of Berlin’s gas streetlamps
I don't fault anyone for making choices different from mine.

> why do we offload that responsibility onto consumers?

I don't view it as offloading anything onto customers. I view it as me deciding what sort of company I'm willing to keep and what sort of behavior I'm willing to support.
Isomorphic javascript is one of the most egregious.
As I mentioned, my post was not about your specific comment there but rather to your account's overall pattern of breaking the site guidelines. I chose to reply to your most recent comment only because that would be the most likely place you would see it.

If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here from now on, we'd appreciate it.
When you say oversmart are you taking about people who believe they are very smart or people who are actually very smart?

Your ‘no experience’ comment makes it seem like the former. And if they are not actually smart, you can probably demonstrate their ineptitude through simple dialog and insightful problem-solving, assuming you are smarter than them.

Also I’m not sure I see a huge distinction between intelligence and experience in this industry. People who are ‘smart’ but don’t have experience tend to do really stupid things like trying to reinvent things that already exist in a better form, or design and code whole products built around a bad design, thus burying their teams in technical debt. And that’s not very smart - that’s stupid on a lot of different levels.
When you apply for the position it then clearly says hybrid at Walnut Creek, CA (bay area).
> Many publishers (large and small) use it quite reliably at an enterprise level.

Not out of the box, and the things they have to do to make it scale would make most devs cry.

I've seen it up close and personal.

WordPress out of the box is good for a low traffic blog. Even then it's not well designed software.
Wealthy people have no idea what "enough" means. This guy could use his time to explore a different acre of his own land every day for 50 years and still not visit his entire property. Instead he's going to court to try to block people from accessing land that isn't even his.

EDIT: Yup, I would have bet my life on it. The plaintiff is the kind of guy who donates millions to an organization to overturn the 2020 election, and then sued them for damages when they failed to overturn it [1]. And when a federal judge cast doubt on his lawsuit, he dismissed it and immediately re-sued in state court, shopping for a better judge. What a piece of work!

1: https://wyofile.com/corner-crossing-landowner-gave-millions-...
If that's the thinking, looks like it will be a long wait. Appears to be another 2 to 3 years before 1.0 hits. And it publicly came out in 2016, so add all those years up.
You are correct. I have been using sidebar tabs for probably a decade now, so I had completely forgotten about the redesign.
> deposits refer specifically to cash held in a bank, not debt

> money is not destroyed

My understanding from my research is that this is exactly how it does work: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/explainers/how-is-money-crea...
The source can be found at https://www.aerosociety.com/news/highlights-from-the-raes-fu... in the section titled "AI – is Skynet here already?"
sure, but it has to start somewhere. as a society dealing with scams and what not, i'm still not convinced that solar will pay itself off in a human life time. so it's not like this new thing is unique. even the Tesla Powerwalls + Solar is not convincing that it's paying back, but there's just something that screams "worth it anyways" about these systems. part of the issue is that in many areas, you are not allowed to cut the cord to public utilities even if you are self-sufficient, so you're never truly free of expenses.
For me googling spam definition brings up google definition in which irrelevant is the first word.

Before getting sidetracked on definitions of other words, I would be deeply surprised if asking a bunch of people on the street "If you received a message you didn't ask for and didn't expect, but it turns out you are very glad you received it and it provided you value, is that spam?" resulted in a broad consensus around "yes"

Unwanted and unsolicited are definitely not the same thing, whether or not you solcit something has nothing to do with if you want it, I'm not sure how those are synonymous. And if being mandated to recieve a message by someone else counts as you soliciting the message, where solicit in its most common definition means to ask for, then I guess that means that everything is solicited?
Vector image editing app Boxy SVG uses the Local Font Access API to let
AIs may be a self-fulfilling prophecy; we trained them on all those sci-fi stories.
Next, dinosaurs.
Analyzing dependencies of JavaScript snippets
I was wondering exactly that, thank you for elucidating.

Reading into it more than I should, it seems to me like what the plaintiff actually believed is that if people thought they could corner cross, it would reduce the value of the property, because it would mean that more people would be emboldened to do it. One group of ladder-bearing hunterrs wouldn't do it themselves, and without the right to cross his property being set in precedent, many groups probably avoided doing it for fear of being sued. The legal gray area dissuaded them. No more! This is one of those times when opening the box killed the cat.
> In Weber’s words: “What is alone important is how the [charismatic] individual is actually regarded by those subject to charismatic authority, by his ‘followers’ or ‘disciples.’ … It is recognition on the part of those subject to authority which is decisive for the validity of charisma.”

https://www.ted.com/talks/derek_sivers_how_to_start_a_moveme...
Ugh, even Power Magazine told us "talk to everyone", but I'd rather not. :P
It's a puff of logic in either circumstance:

If he's wrong, he never had exclusive rights to public land in the first place and it was not his to lose.

If he's right, he obviously did not suffer the loss of the value of that property.
Similar issue with “The Narrows” in TX, but instead relating to the riverbed: https://texasriverbum.com/index.php/2014/09/17/hike-and-hass...
Hiring in Growth – Tweet Hunter – help us grow to 10M ARR
> The US military is playing with fire creating AI that will carry out the mission at all costs. This scenario is literally the plot of EVERY sci-fi warning about misused AI.

These aren't operational systems, these are research systems. No need for the hyperbole. The reason for these tests is to figure out exactly these kinds of failure modes (many of which have already been predicted) and how to handle them.
I like to preserve skepticism here as well, though probably blaming them won’t help the issue.

But absolutely agreed, just listened to Gary Marcus’s podcast episode on how LLMs are already capable of making dad jokes, but they can’t do neither “deep” humor generation nor “deep” humor explanation very well, in part because they lack all of the cultural and experiential (“touchy-feely”) context of the humans, and an even bigger part since they are optimized for generation, not explanation, while humans are almost the opposite.
You have it backwards: if it's open source, then you can see the code. This remains true even in cases people are being sloppy with the term.

Open source is whatever follows the open source definition. No more, no less.

What you are talking about is source available. This is the only designation that is not confusing and that is uncontroversial.

I haven't seen any half-serious project use "open source" that does not actually use an OSI-approved license.

But I agree with the parent commenter. Do check out what is the actual license in any case, and feel free to avoid the term open source altogether if you think it confuses people. As this HN thread seems to show, the term does seem to confuse people indeed. You can use free software, or even "libre" if you find free software confusing. Or FLOSS.
I agree "open source" has become a problematic term, thanks to people who want to throw political dogma onto an otherwise useful term.

I've seen plenty of open source software published under restrictive licenses, and closed source software published under free-as-in-beer and/or free-as-in-libre licenses.

Open/closed source seriously has nothing to do with payment terms, usage rights (aside from viewing the source code, obviously), and whatever else. It is very counterproductive that people keep trying to conflate what open/closed source means.
This is mostly going to be the same. The main difference in tensorization is that your vectors are not contiguous. So you lose some speedup. How you typically optimize this is by flattening your tensor. Then your data is contiguious and all the same rules apply.

This is overly simplified though. Things get different when we start talking about {S,M}I{S,M}D (page addresses SIMD) or GPUs. Parallel computing is a whole other game, and CUDA takes it to the next level (lots of people can write CUDA kernels, not a lot of people can write GOOD CUDA kernels (I'm definitely not a pro, but know some)). Parallelism adds another level of complexity due to being able to access different memory locations simultaneously. If you think concurrent optimization is magic, parallel optimization is wizardry (I still believe this is true)
> I'd say auto-vectorization should still be learned by modern high-performance programmers, because its very low-hanging fruit.

Somewhat related: 55 GiB/s FizzBuzz https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/215216/high-thr... (discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29031488)
Meh, commercial customers already had AR headsets and even at more expensive pinpoints those were still justifiable for business as they're tax write-offs anyway.

Also, I doubt Meta have a damn about commercial users as commercial users don't drive sales. Meta makes money on the Quest by selling you games on the Quest store. Commercial customers don't buy any games. The Quest 2 for business is 2x more expensive for commercial users.
Wordpress has value in its ability to get a site up very quickly. If I, one person, want to, I can get a pretty professional site up in a day. That's a powerful. I can then come back to it later and improve it given my needs. Startups are all about limited resources and Wordpress is a good tool to use. What's a better alternative?
It's a matter of personal taste. Some people (including myself) simply like Intel syntax better. As a sidenote, I find it quite fitting since Linux - unlike Unix - was "born" on Intel hardware after all :)
The plaintiff's complaint is so contrived that I almost wonder if it's all a setup to get this law overturned. No judge in their right mind would award anything close to the damages that they're asking for, and their argument in favor of the damages is the perfect illustration for how bad the law is:

> Eshelman asserts that when the men corner-crossed — stepping from one piece of public land to another at a four-corner intersection with his ranch — they damaged him by up to $7.75 million.

> That’s based on a 25% devaluation of the Elk Mountain Ranch, appraised at $31.1 million in 2017.

> Rinehart would discount the ranch by 30% if corner crossing was declared legal, he said in an affidavit. His figure would raise alleged damages to a total of $9.39 million.

So the argument essentially is "this law gives me de facto ownership of 25% more property than I actually own, and these guys trying to cross it somehow sets a precedent to set that land free". IANAL, but on the face of it that makes zero sense because two dudes breaking the law doesn't undo the law.

However, if they're not actually trying to win, this is a pretty solid argument to make if you're trying to persuade a judge to legalize corner crossing.

https://www.gillettenewsrecord.com/news/wyoming/article_a519...
By this logic of five squares, wouldn't that reduce the value by 20%
Disco didn't die in the states at all. It kept on going. As a mainstream genre, maybe, for a while. But it evolved into the various house and techno and the myriad of sub-genres that are still flourishing to this day.
Masnick's Impossibility Theorem: Moderation at Scale Is Impossible to Do Well
Psychedelics aren’t addictive and most you can not take multiple days in a row
The flamewar detector is just a simple bit of code that looks for threads which have many comments but not so many upvotes. It's far from perfect but it works well enough, especially because it sends us an email each time it demotes a thread, and we review those emails and correct the cases it gets wrong.

More to the point, it's completely neutral with respect to the content of an article or the comments.
Of course.

The part I was responding to was this:

> when the duck actually has read the Internet and has useful suggestions and ideas back to share

I think that if it does that, it's legitimately less useful as a rubber duck. I'm not saying it isn't useful -- it's just not useful as a rubber duck anymore.
I'm surprised landowners in Wyoming own the airspace above their land. Normally you are only allowed to control as much airspace as required for the ordinary enjoyment of your property (for buildings and such).
https://law.justia.com/codes/wyoming/2019/title-10/chapter-4...
I think you got the analogy wrong. It's rather that probably some games are actually rigged but the fans are not complaining about exactly these.
Warning, that's NOT "firewalled" from your main application/database.

If it's just part of the path on the same domain, then almost any Wordpress security vulnerability can leak over into your main application (i.e., cookies, credential stuffing, xss, etc)
Instinctively that's surprising... replica failover should be far simpler technically, shouldn't it?
Theres a line between someone who expects you to drop your friends and prioritizing your partnership over friendships. Usually that line is time and a good understanding of the motivations of your potential partner.

I've known women that prioritize their friends over their partners. They wind up taking each others advice to leave their men, they wind up lonely, raising children by themselves, resentful of one another and with a lot of regrets. They end up settling for men they don't respect just to stave off the loneliness and all the relationship problems that come with that.

If you want a family, prioritize family. That means being selective of who you choose to partner with, making a conscious choice to be good to that person, and telling your friends to get fucked when they think they can tell you how to live your life.
Location: New York (NYC)

Remote: Yes, but prefer hybrid

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Java, JavaScript, React, Spring, Postgres, Neo4j, Kafka, Microservices, TypeScript

Résumé/CV: https://ivan.sh/resume.pdf | https://ivan.sh/ | https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivangreene/

Email: ivan@ivan.sh

Experience as lead software engineer at an early stage startup, as well as experience in larger organizations. Prefer early stage startups in NYC
> Funds from these support the cause on the plate typically.

What percentage, though?
it was never the legs that failed, but it was always the gut/diaphragm. as a defender, i'd make sure that the run we're about to make when that ball comes over the top was done at my pace using all of the dark arts i could muster.

good luck!
I'd guess it just uses the central point of each city.
Here's the best I can do with the first bit, several edits later:

A letyll tale y wyll yow tell
y troye hit wyll lyke yow well
þat ye shall habe gud game ooooo
Bot were(?) it was y dar? not say
for appyr.??ly a nod? day
hit myght t?ne me to blame ooooooo
?ow take gud hede evrython(?)
how a yomon come rydyng alon
hafull fayre way he fond ooooooo
he lokud be syde hym lyght glydand
he fond a hare full fayr syttand
a pon a falow lond ooooooooo
he markyd wyll wher the fatt þ
þkyd to the town as fast as he myght go
þ way þen con he ha? ooooooo
þ fyrst mon þt he mett wt all
was a husbond hyght honkyn of þ hall
a gud mon and a twwe(?) oooooooo
...

We have letyll = little, wyll = will, troye = trust(?), hit = it, lyke = like, yow = you, habe = have, gud = good, yomon = yeoman, rydyng = riding, lokud = looked, be syde = beside, hym = him, fayr = fair, syttand = seated/sitting, etc.

I think the y with dot over is "I", while the þ with a dot is "the" or "thou" etc. I'm not entirely sure what all the abbreviations are supposed to be.

* * *

Edit: there's apparently a full transcription at http://doi.org/10.1515/angl.2010.009 though it's not easy to accurately transcribe something like this so full of abbreviations, old spellings based on old pronunciations, archaic glyphs like ſ and þ, letters like u and v which have since diverged, etc.
The ruling very intentionally says "on foot", which limits it to people walking across. Leaves the door open for future debate/interpretation about vehicular traffic. You might be able to design an offroad vehicle that can "step" across the boundary but by my (non-lawyer) reading this isn't covered by that.
Are we arguing whether astroturfing is a real thing?
This ranch apparently consists of quite a few squares in a complicated pattern, but even if it were just the four it wouldn't end up being exactly 20% because you would have to factor in the partial ownership of every adjacent public square, not just the one you surround completely.
Same. There ought to be a way to submit inconsequential things like typos through a separate system that don't get counted as pull requests. That way the people who are genuinely claiming good faith shouldn't really care if it doesn't count as part of your "PR score".
I found Wordpress worked best when it wasn’t publicly available. I always cached/proxied the content via a CDN and then restricted access to the backend via an internal network. Helped a lot, if anyone is going through something similar
The Internal State of an LLM Knows When its Lying

https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.13734
Spot on. My ability to separate myself from an issue and view it as a 3rd party came around this.

Sometimes you had separate yourself pretty far from something to be able absorb and understand an issue, and LSD can cause that space.

I see the space, the separating, as the benefit. Gave new prospective.
Actuator survived 100M Flaps [YouTube]
It's hard to identify people to start talking to with those characteristics, as many of them are only apparent after you're in conversation.
Chapel: Programming Language for Parallel Computing
How is this relevant? This is more of a critique of floats than it is about vectorization.
If you, like me, were interested in learning more about the physiological phenomenon, perhaps wikipedia will slake your thirst: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsleep
> we do not owe journalists our trust

I agree!

> they need to take proactive steps to regain that trust, which had clearly been lost

Speak for yourself! It varies greatly with the journalist and publication, of course, but journalists earn my trust every day in their articles. The amount of direct, personal, on-the-ground research is really impressive.

> Journalists collaborating with the very state institutions over which they are meant to be a watchdog for the sake of future access is destroying the profession.

That's been complained about for a long time - it's nothing new and not 'destroying the profession'. But how do you maintain access to key information valuable to the public, while criticizing the people who provide it? It's a real challenge.

And yet journalism does amazing things.

> Blaming consumers of journalism for lack of trust, is a step away from victim-blaming.

If you can't take some disagreement, you are in the wrong place! Probably you shouldn't read journalism either.
GPT-4 portal may be using GPT-3 when needed
Seeking Work | Remote | NLP and LLM Specialist

I am an NLP focused consultant. Previously, I've worked with small startups build value-add ML projects and design data flows which help set the foundation for future ML products.

I use the latest tools and state of the art research to take a problem from inception to production-ready code and models.
My practical experience as a founder helps me connect to the startup mentality of always providing value.

Email: kaiser@pister.dev Resume: https://pister.dev/files/resume.pdf (https://pister.dev)
The tweet is a response to an API user saying GPT-4 got worse, and the tweet is clearly talking about the API and the model - the context of the HN megathread mostly talking about ChatGPT isn't present in the tweet that's being replied to.

There's a lot of confusion around this, but nothing appears to be caused by doublespeak to me. Confusion about which GPT/ChatGPT anyone is reporting about has been pretty ubiquitous for a while.