skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm not sure if it could be called a plan or if it's just an inertial thing because of everyone's selfishness. The rich of the world (the whatever percentage where a phone doesn't cost a year or more of their salary) still want the shiny gadgets for the lowest prices, to fly to places they saw on Instagram, and they would moan if someone said we couldn't have those luxuries anymore, and they'd say the boomers/billionaires could/can have them, why can't we?
I never heard of apl's allowing for an explicit choice of initial value, nor direction control ('from-end'), which mls typically also provide (foldl vs foldr). On the other hand, the ad-hoc choice of result for an empty input is a flaw common to cl and apl.
I'd say ADL e-core beelink esque smallboxes for $150 offer good value and decent tdp. No where near pi, but also not like the old Skylake thin boxes, either. We're talking probably sub 65w all in, maybe even closer to 35w.
With the end result of the output being: it's just predicting next words
Just a little screen recording of what we can expect would be awesome
It seems kind of weird now that java has a repl anyways.
Good employers already give you your own laptop and might offer to give you a phone. But good employers are few and far between, especially in recession-esque periods where everyone that doesn't have an extremely resilient IT staff (or isn't a public company) will have bean counters cutting costs in many areas, either downsizing new laptop purchases (making doing work harder) or cutting them all-together.
Well what is it if not a cultural difference in discussing a technical issue that the thread-starting comment asserted don't exist?
In addition to the BMW there is the Nissan Note e-Power and the Honda Fit/Jazz hybrid -- just off the top of my head. The Note is rated for 800km (500 mi) per tankful, IIRC. I believe the Jazz is no longer sold in AU but there are used imports from Japan, probably.

The thing you want is called a "series hybrid" design.

1. Nissan e-Power: https://carbuzz.com/news/what-is-nissan-e-power-and-why-cant...
I was only a little concerned buying a Tesla Model Y with "300" mile range. I travel between Los Angel And San Diego frequently and there are a good number of charging stations to be sure. But even though the car tells you to keep between 20% and 80% charge, almost cutting the effective mileage in half, the extra stops just aren't that bad. What's true of lithium ion batteries is that the emptier the battery, the significantly faster the charging rate. So I can skip the stop on my route, but usually I just pull over when the percentage gets pretty low for maybe 20 to 30 minutes, and if I start pretty low, I'll easily get 30-40 percent charge increase. It's really not that painful, and at least in California, they put the charging locations near restaurants and coffee shops and malls so I can take a little break on those long trips. Sure, a car with 1000+ mile range sounds great. But driving a car that heavy with batteries sounds unnecessary and nearly all people are making far shorter trips to e.g. the grocery store 10 miles away and the little dinky trickle charger I use at home is more than adequate, I almost never have to do what ICE cars do on a regular basis, stopping at all the dirty gas stations, my car is usually more than charged over night.
Recent and related:

Developers are lazy, thus Flatpak - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36185498 - June 2023 (18 comments)
The bananas weren’t stolen, they were sold to the gorilla in return for seed distribution services. The tree wants the gorilla to distribute the banana seed within a fertiliser package (poop) some distance away. And the gorilla wants calories, which the tree can endlessly produce using solar power. It’s a fair trade.
So why are we even arguing about this new form of copyright that restricts who can learn from a work?

If an AI model produces an infringing work and someone distributes it, sue them like you would a human doing the same thing.

This idea of training being a violation of copyright is insane.
I also thought that might be a challenge, but it seems like the only user facing input is the prompt to create your LLM.
Another important difference in business cultures is handling difficult or unachievable requirements. Say you send a work order that needs very tight tolerance in a certain set of holes or a high degree of flatness on a particular surface, and while the company can make the part, they cannot quite fulfill that specific requirement. How each culture handles that situation can vary dramatically, especially outside of the West.

For instance, a German manufacturer will generally tell you “no, we cannot achieve that” on the initial proposal and won’t agree to any requirement they aren’t completely confident they can meet. (This can be frustrating as it feels like they aren’t willing to try.)

An American manufacturer will generally be more willing to agree to requirements they might not be able to meet, as they will make an effort to meet them, and inform you early on when their effort fails. (This can be frustrating, as it feels like they’ve surprised you.)

A British manufacturer tends to be somewhere in between, they will initially flag the difficult requirement in an understated way, gradually becoming less understated as the problem grows. So there’s a hint of the German immediate no, and they ramp up to the American “So, it turns out…”.

Where this gets quite dramatically different is when you venture outside of the West.

The Japanese way is to continually promise fulfillment while conspicuously making no progress on it. It can be quite odd to experience - until you realize they’re trying to get you to notice the contradiction, so you can conclude for yourself that the requirement isn’t possible for them, and then reach out and relieve them of the obligation. It has the same function as the American “So, it turns out…”, it’s just obfuscated with politeness. Without awareness of this you can get into some really difficult situations.

The Chinese way is even more wild to Westerners. Their solution for a requirement they can’t fulfill is to produce a small sample of parts that do meet the requirement and give you those first. The idea is that you can use those to show your boss that the requirements have been met.
Maybe off topic, and please excuse the hate, but I despise this fashion of hiding the scroll bar on the right and making it as thin as possible.

1) I often miss what isn't there. And I can't be the only one. This means that I literally miss my aim when I'm trying to get to the bar. What should be painless and easy is a pain and frustrating.

2) We have enough screen real estate. It's cheap. Burn that bar in. Don't be shy. Let go of the dynamic fru-fru garbage. Embrace the mechanical. Back in 640x480 land people had burned in scroll bars and did their work and play. Sheesh.
GitHub stars? You mean the stars you can purchase through third party bot services? (As shown here recently on HN!)
The Japanese firms and megabanks funding rainforest destruction
Or books3. :)

(I put together a dataset of 190,000 books that I called books3, which llama eventually trained on. Usage rights are a big interest of mine, primarily because there’s a weird disconnect of people trying to claim copyright over models when the underlying data obviously wasn’t copyrightable.)
Is that price volatility real?
Or literally ask ChatGPT if Jupiter can fit in the space between Earth and the Moon.

(it fails.)
Good question!

CDR.fyi aggregates purchases, deliveries, and verifications of carbon removed and stored for more than 100 years

CDR.fyi does not track things like "avoided emissions" (like switching your fleet from gas to EV) or lower-permanence solutions (like planting trees)

(Methods show up on that chart when you hover, but good UX feedback there :)
The money that are paid as the exorbitant AWS egress fees could be used to pay a competent SRE to handle that. I don't think that running the package mirror would require a full-time dedicated paid position. Initial setup, maybe some heavy restructuring operations as storage requirements grow, maybe some firefighting, but not the daily operation.
The next stage is requiring a phone number to sign up and having no privacy online.
How many tons? I own a forest that was historically used for timber, but I am thinking about making biochar at the small single tons level, and burying it into the soil.
Thoughts on Music (2007)
No, we don't.

My dad slaved away for years writing his books. He knew they'd never make money, he did it for the academic reputation. Going over his papers after he passed, he made a few hundred dollars off of them. I expect that meant a couple pennies an hour for his labor.

For another example, the current music industry is pretty much post-copyright. Musicians don't make money from streaming or CDs, they make it from live performances, performing at private events, endorsements, etc.

As for me, I'm the CEO of the D Language Foundation, and we give away all our work for free under the most permissible license we could find - the Boost license.
How is this different from any other trade secret
Territorialism in animals is a behavioural construct. An animal can defend its territory solely via its own volition and actions, rather than through some herd or tribal agreement. A spider's web or ant lion's trap are both example which suggest territoriality without sociality. (There are of course social insects: bees, ants, and termite most well known.)

A social construct would be one which operates through common understanding and agreement amongst multiple animals, typically of a single species, and generally amongst a single tribe or herd. I don't think of examples off the top of my head, though I suspect they exist. I'd also probably want to distinguish instinctual behaviours (e.g., bees, ants, termites) from cultural behaviours, learned, taught, and passed down within a specific group. A cleavage between the two concepts would be that instinctual behaviours re-emerge even when individuals are not raised or taught by older generations, whilst cultural behaviours are lost where the social transmission via teaching is broken.

(And yes, the thought comes to mind that several phenomena widely labled as "social constructs" amongst humans would likely be re-labled as instinctual based on the distinction I've drawn here.)

Merriam-Webster: "an idea that has been created and accepted by the people in a society".

<https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/social%20construc...>

ThoughtCo has a brief introduction to the concept of social construct:

<https://www.thoughtco.com/social-constructionism-4586374>
Today's reddit mods are the same as Digg's power user's back in the day. It's an open secret that a few dozen or so individuals control the top 100 or so subreddits, and calling that fact out is often met with site wide bans.

Reddit died a long time ago, and it's time we let it go.
What is the 314th decimal in pi
>Do they really know exactly what the raw text looks like?

I mean yea, it's too big. That said, in a post ad hoc fashion they do. When the model spits out weird crap at times, they can search the raw corpus and filter those strings out. There was an incident around this with Reddit counting forums and strange usernames that were added in tokenization, but later removed from weights leading to odd behavior when doing inference.
What part of the standard mandates, or even optionally supports that?

Standard USB-PD only requires that you negotiate a voltage and current suitable for both sides (among a preset list). It essentially goes open loop after that; you can't exceed the current limit set, but beyond potentially tripping the PD controller (on the sink side) if the voltage drops too low, there's not really any protection here. It's fully on the PD sink to implement (or, not implement) any sort of protections like that.
I think AI aren’t people, and that they’re not even AI: it’s machine learning, and ML is a subset of AI that we haven’t really broken out of. ML is a tool, and asking whether ML should be allowed to learn on copyrighted work is equivalent to asking whether your computer is allowed to contain a copyrighted work: “it depends.”

I’m in favor of getting rid of copyright entirely, since it’s become a far cry from what it was intended to be, but we have to acknowledge both sides of the arguments in order to proceed.
As ever, I wish I lived in the world the distro packagers are packaging software for, but in practice, I frequently do want to use the apps that make the distro packagers throw up their hands and go "we can't ship it like that".
Some architectures (e.g. the 65816, the 6502's "big brother" used in the Apple IIgs) include stack pointer relative addressing modes, which will complete the memory read and return data faster than the same instruction with a full address encoded.
> I don't want O'Reilly or whomever selling it for money

O'Reilly is free to sell D compilers if they want to, for as much as they want to.
> Separating every dependency would be really inconvenient, just like managing graphical apps in a Linux distribution. If, for example, a flatpak named XYZ needs 10 dependencies, whereby one of the dependencies changes the version that the developers of the XYZ flatpak have not tested, then it could lead to bugs or even breakages that would make it really difficult for developers to trace back, as they would need to frequently contact each packager and figure out together. So, as mentioned by the author, the solution is to let the developers bundle everything, as they test their apps against an environment that is easier to understand.

So why not just statically link at this point?
A perfect case for something like Backblaze to sponsor it and get some more publicity.
It seems to me like you are describing an unlikely situation where a lot of conditions would need to be true for >20 year copyright to make sense:

1. Many artists are commercial failures for over two decades, but eventually succeed;

2. These artists’ newer successful works don’t result in income equivalent to working a full-time non-creative job for that time;

3. Fans will not pay them for the old works without the threat of legal action;

4. There is no other way to monetise the old works by e.g. recording a commentary, audiobook, screenplay adaptation, manuscripts, compilations, special editions, etc.;

5. Artists don’t pander to current trends only because they know they might be able to make some money over 20 years later;

6. The money they will get paid in royalties under a contract where they sold the rights to a publisher when they were an unknown nobody is greater than the amount of money they would make selling it directly in the public domain after becoming commercially successful.
I try to avoid setuid binaries written in memory-unsafe languages.

This feels like the wrong direction.
I have a similar setup, and the use case is that it’s a single USB C swap for my entire workstation setup to go from my work laptop to my gaming PC. Just a convenience thing.
Yeah, but I’d have a script ready for that.

Now I wonder how AI would use humans to defeat captchas. Mechanical Turk? Run their own sites to route these captchas to? A farm of Matrix pods?
> no one involved in selecting books or publishing them has any incentive to keep the costs reasonable.

There is an difference in having no incentive to keep costs down and having an incentive to keep costs up. Some professors are simply indifferent to their students' plights. As far as these professors are concerned their students are just an inconvenient bleep in their oh-so-important life. Extracting money from them is not on their radar.

The vast majority of professors don't write textbooks. In fact there are probably a lot more profs who do care, and assign open books, or no books at all, than professors who make a living writing textbooks.
It's not.

I think because of the broad implications some people expect everything to be open source.

But I think that's unrealistic and naive.
XDG portals are just APIs that applications can implement and use.

Regardless, do you not trust the applications that you run natively?
https://github.com/topics/joinery :

- chantzlarge/joinery : https://github.com/chantzlarge/joinery

https://github.com/topics/woodworking

- petrasvestartas/compas_wood: https://github.com/petrasvestartas/compas_wood gallery: https://petrasvestartas.github.io/compas_wood/latest/#galler... (Python)

- marialarsson/tsugite: https://github.com/marialarsson/tsugite (Python)

https://github.com/topics/cnc

https://github.com/topics/freecad

https://wiki.freecad.org/Power_users_hub (Python)

https://freecad.github.io/SourceDoc/modules.html
D uses the Boost license, which is not viral. You can use D and its source code for whatever you like.
I have been in and out of this for many weeks, and... Its so much nicer than Twitter. Its more polite, more accurate, and more entertaining.

Maybe not more engaging, but that is a good thing.
The delivery curve is pretty clearly exponentially increasing, so yes, it would make intuitive sense that delivery is at an all time peak, because delivery is rapidly increasing.

It would be much more concerning if the all time peak was historical, and it was post peak. That would indicate something negative.

Being at an all time peak is a strongly good sign.
Unless unsafe package is used which is rare or there’s a bug in the compiler which is rarer still you will not get silent memory corruption bugs which are stupid common in C and hard to debug to boot
An author of fiction may sometimes retain copyright for some forms of derived works, ex "movie rights" [0], with the expectation that they aren't worth much until the original literary work has drawn a significant audience.

[0] https://youtu.be/Rjv1NlMiUyI?t=65
Wlitlhl the way the internet is headed, I'm expecting an auto API generator to plug the API holes twitter and reddit are planning.

Webscraping will rise again.
There's plenty of smaller pins that run MUCH higher amperage through them without an issue (M.2 sockets for NVMe drives come to mind). Granted, those are secured a bit better... but you have to trust the mechanical designers of this interface have actually thought things through here. It's robust.
Isolation of vulnerable people is problematic because ~5% of the population was highly vulnerable, and actually isolating them would require extreme resources that we simply don't have. Rather, what was meant from the statements of signatories and drafters, was to let it rip for 99.5% of the population and offer less actual protection to the rest than we gave to the least protected in our scenario.
We know for a fact that GPT-4's RLHF makes the model worse by incurring an "alignment tax." Microsoft Research and others had access to GPT-4 pre-RLHF and all reported that it was far more capable then and that it lost capability as RLHF/Alignment training checkpoints came in.
The past decade of social media was about capturing attention. The next generation of social media will be about capturing intimacy.
Japanese carpentry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_carpentry

/? Japanese joinery: https://m.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=japanese+...
Get it?! _RAM?!?!!’!!?!!_ HA HAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAH
Yeah good point I would rephrase. Our participation will be much more active than "letting" anything.
It's pretty easy to turn off the when observers, simply `delete when`.

Side-effect is that it will delete all the whens, so only use it if you need it!
No question, I just love everything about this site! Official info feeds aside, its literally nicer than Twitter.

Maybe a stretch suggestion: push the bots to interact with other users directly mentioned in their bio, with an @?
Good luck trying to administer corporal punishment to a young man who is bigger, fitter and stronger than you, has already demonstrated a willingness to use violence against you and has a room full of willing accomplices. I hope that anyone foolish enough to try it has good healthcare.
Is it unsubstantive to state that the potential demise of social media is a good thing?

If you ask me, unsubstantive would be to nip potential discussions in the bud.

As an aside, thanks for proving my point. Social media is a cancer upon humanity so long as its purpose is to manipulate and direct the people.
Wow the op-ed liked from the Examples section is just brutal. Incredibly brutal. https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/opinion/article/Stamford-is...

Is Stamford really that bad?
hmmm...were you able to click/search for the company?

check this out: https://www.cdr.fyi/purchaser/microsoft
There's still some reuse between flatpak apps, and not everything one might depend on necessarily is of the shape of a statically linkable library.
While reading this, I was immediately reminded of the reduce operator, glad to see my intuition wasn't far off.

The nifty thing about this operator in the array-langs compared to the usual fold function is that they usually define identity elements for all primitive functions, which means that no initial value has to be provided: https://aplwiki.com/wiki/Identity_element

The downside of this approach though, is that using reduce with non-primitive functions can result in domain errors (at least in APL). I think BQN's version of the operator is a bit nicer, in that it allows you to specify an initial value in this situation: https://mlochbaum.github.io/BQN/doc/fold.html
We need inverse captchas
I mean I trust Firefox to not steal my data, or maybe $APP_NAME, but do I trust the C++ code? Or maybe it's an app that's been pwned a lot.

Sandboxing has uses other than running actively hostile apps (for which I'd argue this kind of sandboxing isn't enough).
I wonder if there is anything like this for snakes.
The sequencing was fascinating!

I'd never considered how much "it helps to have rail, to replace rail" impacted the process -- but it makes sense as everything is incredibly heavy! (Rails, sleepers, aggregate)

From that perspective, of course you'd excavate and clean the track ballast while you're also on the same track. And same with sleeper and track replacement.
> Supporting one's family is a major goal of many people.

I inherited my dad's copyrights. The annual royalties might pay for a movie ticket.
Why do “they” control sheep-related volume measurements in the media though? Perhaps George Soros is behind this. Curious…
We already have two sources, the poster, and this thread. Also I just posted it on two fairly popular internet forums. Someone should do reddit because I don't.
If you want to do something that requires bravery and is unpleasant, I'd like to suggest giving blood instead? You have to get stabbed at least twice (once to test your red blood count, the other to actually stick the needle in) and then sit still with a needle in you until a bag of your blood fills. It's overall pretty unpleasant. But also, you save lives, unlike jumping into a cold pool.
That one's not a good example:

> Condition: For parts or not working
If you put the memory on the same package as the CPU it can have higher bandwidth without needing an unreasonably high number of pins in the CPU socket.

But there is no reason you can't do both. Intel is already by putting HBM on the Xeon Max. It still has separate memory slots, because they're for two different things. HBM is fast and expensive. DDR costs less so you can have more of it for the same amount of money and the large majority of workloads aren't memory-bound.

You could then have systems with DIMM slots that aren't populated because the CPU has enough HBM to satisfy you, others that cost less with no HBM and the same amount of DDR, and still others that have say 16GB of HBM and 128GB of DDR. Both of which are still upgradable, but if you want more HBM it comes with a new CPU.
I don't understand your figures. Are you saying that it takes 10 minutes to fill up 1/3rd of a battery charge?
Summer Camp Became Such a Hot Mess for Parents
"The tortoise lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs trying to turn itself over but it can't. Not without your help. But you're not helping."