skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Reddit sucks. If you use it, you are part of the problem

"We should improve society somewhat"

"Ah but yet you participate in society, curious! I am very intelligent :)"[1]

>unless you were complaining when people were trying to ban one of only a couple conservative subs

/r/Conspiracy, /r/Conservative are two of the biggest troll far- conservative subs on the site. They've gone from strength to strength regardless of Reddit's actions

>talking about not letting peak Covid insanity become the “new normal”

Millions of people died, what is wrong with you

>or if you were ok with someone being banned for “I don’t view trans women as women”

Bad covid takes and Transphobia? Yuck

[1] https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/259/257/342...
Yeah, a guy who 'might uppercut me' sounds like a great male role model. You could probably get Andrew Tate in for the job, once he's out of jail.
Just remove that word - I failed to properly edit the sentence.
Libraries are an odd artifact of history. They exist today because they are an undeniable public good.

If they didn't already exist they would never be allowed to come to exist in today's world. It would be considered wholesale IP theft and people would be arguing that the very notion of the idea would be the death of creativity.

Many of the problems of smartphones are not intrinsic to the technology but are a reflection of that modern world. Many people would call that late stage capitalism, but without much of that capitalism the technology wouldn't exist.

This has turned into a ramble, I apologize.
Reddit is a large social media site and its demise is newsworthy, regardless of its association with HN
>forgot what is it to be one.

Most adults seem to forget all their memories of their childhood, particularly if they become parents at which point they forget everything instantly.

I'm not sure why this is, what this phenomenon is called (if it has a name), and I would sincerely appreciate a scientific explanation if there is one. I still remember my childhood from about 4 years old onward as a guy in his mid 30s, so I simply can't relate to it.
Yup, I was expecting this kind of nit-picking. Bottom line is that 37gb for such an extreme number of apps and runtimes is actually pretty small, and thus Flatpak is doing a decent job (especially compared to everyone else but the fringe systems that regular users don't want).
Personally couldn't care less what colors they use or didn't use. As long as the material is valuable. I am here to learn, not to take pictures like a foodie and admire colors.

For me, the colors they have on there are great. I can focus without distractions of moving backgrounds, gradient colors etc.
Shopee and Lazada are both owned/run by Chinese. As is obviously Tiktok.
Grab by Malaysians.

What do you mean by 'home grown'?
Indeed for all its design issues, it is still way better than using plain old C, unless there is no way around it.
This is so good, it could be used as a list of riddles for programmers.

Dividing by zero returns undefined

it took me a few minutes of thinking before finding why it's wrong
> The app gains nothing by being in google proper.

Or Google gets sued and pays fines that exceed the value of the company. As evidenced in this thread, Google is increasingly losing goodwill and trust from tech people. This product that has good content but seemingly haphazardly rolled out isn't helping.

Maybe the solution is for Google to stop acquiring companies unless they have a streamlined pathway to integration and an environment which those companies thrive.
Consider including some other comments from the thread as examples
I still have this hard feeling that the never-ending cycle of increasing home value isn't fed by an over-zealous US house pricing phenomenon. There is definitely scarcity, but why does housing fundamentally increase in value so dramatically over relatively small periods when nothing fundamentally changed of the property.
Unleashing this would hasten the future where everyone has to scan their IDs to do anything online, because investors want to know how many real humans are using their companies' products. Same with advertisers.
Even volunteers have power. The question is how much? Often workers (paid or unpaid) believe they are irreplaceable, and start acting that way. It behoves management to find out if that is true. It can also help the relationships a lot if the workers find out its not true.

We're all in relationships with others all the time. I can push my suppliers some, but not too hard. I complain about other suppliers, but in some cases have little power so walk softly.

Reddit moderators believe they have power over API pricing. I guess we'll see who is right.
Accelerate your next Prisma server with Elysia
Qwiklabs is a Google company. It handles most if not all of their technical training that has labs. It has been a Google company for more than 7 years.
So if I’m understanding, stack allowed moderators to issue 30-day bans without following normal escalation policies, if a moderator had any reason to suspect that a user posted AI-generated content.

The new policy is that you have to follow all the normal policies for all the posts, you don’t get to pull out the banhammer just for a suspicion of AI. And the moderators are striking because their want to keep the power to issue uncontestable 30-day bans whenever they feel like it?
Yeeep. Same thing happened to me. I went from getting lots of vote activity (positive and negative) and responses to… nothing essentially after I made one comment that blew up a few months ago.

It’s pretty damn disappointing. Guess I shouldn’t have been surprised tho.
So you trust Google can afford Google.com but you specifically think a TLD of .Google is phishing and not literally the first TLD they would buy when the proliferation of new custom TLDs came out years ago?
This seems like more of the kind I was advocating against, though it certainly is more common. I suppose there is a distinction between worker co-ops and just profit-sharing, which is what OP actually asked about. My mistake for sort-of answering the wrong question. But back to my point:

Instead of retaining a flat 50% for "growth", it should be decided each quarter consensually. Infinite growth is not a good thing, it's the global problem. Needs should be met and the expected/needed growth should be funded if profits are good enough for growth, but there shouldn't be this looming expectation of always expanding. It doesn't have to be an infection.

For sure the 25% to shareholders is off the table anywhere I'm going to work. That's the one thing that makes or breaks the whole worker-owned thing. Unless you consider the workers with their 1 share each to be "the shareholders", in which case I think it could be a good idea to set aside a flat 25% to distribute evenly before all those other calculations take place.

It must be noted that worker-ownership does make one form of investment impossible: selling shares of the company. With that being a major form of investment in the modern world it might sound crazy, but it's what's right, and there are other ways for investors to make their cut; they just won't be able to milk the company for every drop or have decision-making power anymore (unless they get a job at said company and exercise their 1 share of voting power).
Right but it solidifies a mindset that boils down to “instead of working to communicate with someone about a trait I deem problematic, it’s easier to simply replace that friend with someone else.”
If there weren't many jobs then why on earth is it so difficult for tech companies to get tech workers? Well, that's a rhetorical question of course, because the truth is that there's plenty of work and tech people can pick and choose. Which is why it's hard for companies to get enough engineers and the like.
Never in my life have I encountered anyone outsourcing anything to Barcelona - that's a first. At one point it was popular to try to outsource boiler-plate work to India, well that didn't last particularly long. You get what you pay for (and in the end you pay more).
If looking for lightweight solution with zigbee (usb dongle) one can also take a look at Zigbee2MQTT [0]. This library is used by HomeAssistant under the hood, but it can be used independently as a standalone app and let one interact with zigbee devices using MQTT json messages. And it supports a lot of devices : "Currently 2971 devices are supported from 379 different vendors"

[0] https://www.zigbee2mqtt.io
I saw someone say this the last time Lemmy came up, but I'm legitimately confused at what you're saying here. Is the "fascist" the one insisting on keeping the slur filter or the one asking for it to be removed? And could you elaborate on why either one deserves to be lumped in with Nazis, other than that Godwin's Law decrees it must be so?
In USA there is a very strong 'if you don't tip then you're "that guy"' culture. I think asking for more tips will make people more likely to tip. Probably the culture will change over time and it might end up like you say, for example maybe people born in 2023 will never tip and only boomers tip.
...no it's not?

The acquired company may have (probably was) already compliant, or it ended up being better to allow them to continue to operate independently.

The only surprising thing here is that you think all Google acquisitions are shaped the same.
> I'm happy folks are finally being given the choice of how they want to go out when the time comes.

The only addition is that now doctors will prescribe and, if you want, inject you with the drugs. Prior to that people still had, and continue to have, many choices in death.
The sad reality is that as long as the basic memes and cat pictures continue to get served it doesn't really matter to the Reddit audience as a whole and also doesn't affect their bottom line.
Is this effectively a watch() on a variable?
In 2018, the SF median household income was $97k [1], which suggests a median individual income of about $76k [2]. An average private-sector employee receives benefits worth 42% of their wages/salary [3]. So a hypothetical median SF worker earning $76k in salary would receive about $32k in benefits, for about $108k total.

So it seems to me that the "pooper scoopers" combined salary+benefits of $184k really is, in fact, extraordinarily high.

(No comment on the rest of the article.)

[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/weath-maps-cities-san-franci...

[2] https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publicatio... (I took the nationwide ratio of "$71k median household income" to "$56k median individual full-time year-round worker income" and estimated that the same ratio also applied to SF.)

[3] https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm
Sorry to hear this, but I can’t say that I am surprised. I can offer you a new home on the alternative I’m currently building: https://flingup.com
Sure. Whatever helps. People should be switching their cars to the lowest lifecycle emission cars they can. Battery-electric vehicles handily beat hybrids on this metric. (Perhaps your proposed hybrid ratio would close the gap more.) But as long as you're lowering this number as significantly as you can over your previous car each time you buy, you'll be doing your best. https://theicct.org/publication/ghg-benefits-incentives-ev-m...

FWIW, a ~300 mile EV like the ones on the market today are pretty much there for long distance travel. If you're going camping or something away from the charging network, you can still charge anywhere there is electricity, and quite fast if you find an RV campsite with hookups you can plug into.
> saying we should give them restricted phones - does not work practically

I'm not sure why you dismiss that one. Whitelisting apps works - that's the whole idea behind kiosk devices. There are guides available, but basically you enable only the allowed apps, uninstall webview, lock the account.

Yes, it's not trivial and not everyone will want to do it. (It's available though https://support.google.com/families/answer/7103340?hl=en#zip...) That's exactly why I wrote the last paragraph. Full access was one extreme. The ban is another extreme. (And is not exactly easy to implement either)

Once enough places overreact with the complete bans, the lockdown mode will get better documented, more popular, known by schools, finally (hopefully) easily available from the installation screen.

> because is not applicable today by parents

That's ok. This problem will still exist in a couple of years and this will be a bit easier to do each month. It was actually impossible to implement a few years ago, but we made progress.
The magnet doesn't point to a torrent file, but it can contain links to trackers (and other metadata as well).
We've been there last year. Truth be told, groccery shoppong was nowhere close to what it used to be ten years ago. Actually, groccery prices used to, in total, on par with France at the time and only slightly above Germany.

I do remember the time 3 (!) onions were as expensive as 1.5 kg in Germany. Overall, and I have no idea about rent or salaries, groccery prices were reasonable for 2022.
64MB was good enough for Black Rhino Linux
This situation looks like the perfect opportunity for sandstorm.io to gain some traction as an easy way to self-host chat and forums.
Discovery via DHT is much slower than a tracker.
Realistically, if your dog needs walking you are a bad dog owner. Under this definition most dog ownership is bad.

It means it lives in a confined space not meant for a dog.

Dogs are for farms not cities.
Don’t Ask Us to Come to the Office More – Or We Will Quit, Investors Say
I’m building an alternative and I could use a hand: https://flingup.com but I doubt people will jump ship, Stockholm syndrome?
Yeah, I'm not seeing what's so special either. Maybe it's that you do have to specify that initial value, so your return types are never something you don't expect?
I don't have a running image handy, but

(+) ; => 0
(*) ; => 1

and

(+ n) ; => n
(* n) ; => n

which I expect has some bearing on the behavior of reduce in the examples given.

It's pretty obvious that any other function could either have or be advised to have whatever equivalent semantics are appropriate.

Of course

(apply #'+ '(1 2 3 4 5)) ; => 15

So reduce can be obviated by just letting the function take variable args too.
All of it. Globally.
I’d say the same thing about the billion+ a year the city spends on homeless “programs”
> It really isn't, coming from a 13" laptop with 1080p...

For you maybe, but I know people that are happy with that and some even find 1080p on 13" too crammed, just different taste and applications... I actually had to help out on a 1366x768 15" laptop recently, that was borderline brutal even for me, I completely forgot how one could notice every pixel as such distinct unit back then.

So, if you're not one of them you simply don't scale 2x and get more screen estate, or naturally check if there's another model that provides 5k+.

> And how it is relevant to compare to a 32" screen I don't know, because you hardly use that display on your lap.

Yeah, I almost never use a laptop on my lap, literally that is, and I really didn't think we're constraint to discuss around that axiom ^^ But I think you're mostly looking after (virtual) pixels to be used, while I might favor a higher PPI even though scaling it would give me lower pixel amount to work with.
As someone who administered several websites and forums with friends in the 00s: This. Buy some web server space and host your community yourselves.

The majority of communities centralizing into Reddit, Discord, Facebook, et al. has been a mistake and is a stupid textbook lesson of why the internet was designed as a distributed network.
Was that rent driven? Because Berlon is, still, considered cheap. Not everywhere and a lotnofnlocal are getting priced out since at least the early 2010s, but still cheap compared to places like Munich or Frankfurt.
I don't think we should kill more trees and require that kids continue lugging around backpacks full of heavy textbooks when we have a better alternatives. (To be fair, an e-reader without constant internet access would fit the bill, at least for this particular example.)

Kids aren't addicted to phones. They're addicted to certain types of apps on phones.

My dad brought home an old, destined-for-the-trash computer from work when I was 8 years old, and that was my first introduction to computing, an event that changed the course of my life. If he'd decided "no, I'm not going to let my son use this because he might play a violent video game or download pixelated porn from some BBS", I would not be the curious technologist I am today.

Don't ban the neutral, multi-use technology. Ban the specific thing on it that does harm.
Certain HN discourse are pretty useless. Anything remotely related to Google, Meta, MS, privacy/copyright is filled with often repeated tropes or completely orthogonal discussions. You have to ignore first 40% of comments to find anything meaningful.
We have decided that we are not going to give smartphones to our younger children. Our oldest has, she got it already at age 7, and we have realised that it was a mistake. We have relatively strict regulations for it (only 1 hour per day - sometimes even less etc.) but still we have noticed how it is affecting and changing how she feels about the world around and herself.

One girl in her class doesn't have phone at all! The girl gets complaints from her parents because she reads too much books, spends time outside much more than our kid and does all kinds creative projects. It's same time inspiring and bit depressing to see in comparison how the smartphone free childhood looks like.
No, the new policy means that in almost all cases you cannot moderate content you consider AI-authored at all. This means moderators cannot delete those posts nor suspend the users for this specific reason.

The result is pretty much that AI-generated content is essentially allowed as it cannot be effectively moderated. Even though many sites still have an official policy that disallows it.

Disclaimer: I'm a mod on a small SE site, though I have not acted as a mod on any AI-generated content.
Sandstorm: Open-source platform for self-hosting web apps
The ACM has kindly published the original source along with the rest of their archives.

cf. "Programming Pearls: A literate program" https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/5948.315654

Aside: I received a masterclass from Gradmaster McIlroy, in context of this selfsame shell pipeline: https://www.evalapply.org/posts/shell-aint-a-bad-place-to-fp...

I was floating in the air all week :D

(edit: typo)
What is the objective of the experiment? If there was a good reason for it that would be fine, but without good reason it sounds more like:

"I'm doing an experiment with AI robot which roams around the parks and public places and throws garbage at random locations. I'm experimenting with coke cans, and burger wrappings, but in future i'm planing to introduce car tires and nuclear waste" :(
Miles of piping is still less than hundreds of miles of piping.

> And it is cheaper to move hydrogen than electricity

Citation needed. Probably true across oceans, overland I'm doubtful.
I mean what did you expect?
I was perm. banned for making a joke about choking out an attacking dog on a video of a guy choking out an attacking dog.

I can see you being banned for that.Try to appeal it, I did a couple of times sincerely apologizing for my actions. My ban wasn't reversed. Mostly read it to keep up with the news and car stuff.
Why reader mode?! It simply strips all styles and only retains contents. This webpage has no style, so reader mode should do nothing. If you see differences, it means your browser has different defaults for reader mode and normal mode. Choose which you like most and set it as default.
128Mb Ox64 SBC
The one who institutes a list of banned words and locks discussions about them.
Without addressing anything you wrote, here's three other sources that yields the same results, including one from the ATF. Regardless of your opinions regarding the author there is plenty of data that backs up this assertion.

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385318/

[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/stolen-gunsare-fueli...

[2] https://www.atf.gov/firearms/national-firearms-commerce-and-...
I don't even know why I got 'banned for life'. No recourse, no explanation.

Good riddance frankly.
A reddit style forum seems like it would be relatively easy to decentralize and federate. Any node could host one or more moderated forums, with other nodes caching messages for the users who access the network through those nodes.
This grant is given in exchange of publishing, in exchange to a fact that I made my work available to public.

I don't have to make my work publicly available. I could make it hidden forever or for long time, or to closely share it with a limited number of people.

I can compose a music piece, paint an art, or write a book, and never tell anyone about it. I can do it just out of a pure creativity interest, and without the need to make anything in exchange from the public.

In this case my creativity would be a property in it's very ultimate sense.

I believe that in it's very root the Copyright laws were established to offer something to creative people who truly don't need to be a part of the society, who make their creativity for themself out of a pure genius without the need to receive any reward for their labour. In exchange that they make their work available to public too, so the entire society would benefit from their creations.

This is the offer of the government that grants the author a personal monopoly to their creativity, but this creativity is a Property before it was published.

We can erase this offer, saying that one's work is not truly a property. Well, we can do so, but we can't enforce an author to give up of his property and make it publicly accessed whether we consider it a property or not.
Yes, as a Qwiklabs user, you know this. But it is quite hard to decipher if you haven’t used the platform before. I agree with the GP that the current wording poses an unnecessary cognitive burden and should be more clear. Nothing wrong with e.g. “Mainly yes, but you’ll have to spend a few bucks on the hands-on labs”