skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think you're arguing for a central government taking things in their hand and push a common social policy across all states.

"Government should do its job at the country level" shouldn't be some taboo or undefendable position.
The blind spot with this common and oft-repeated perspective is that this was near the median amount of time it takes for the Supreme Court to overrule itself. Meaning this wasn’t unique or rare or an outlier.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31962613

the rationale presented in the case was a reversion to the mean, where the court doesn't function as a surrogate for the legislature. grasping at the procedural aspects of appointment because the judicial review was sound but disruptive suggests that these aren't strong arguments about the judges.
Supreme Court opinions are usually pretty easy to read. There’s also a “syllabus” that summarizes the decision, although it’s sometimes harder to understand than the opinions. Here are the syllabus and opinion for this case: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/22-200
This court is illegitimate because most of it was appointed by Presidents who lost the popular vote. The fact it keeps dropping decisions that are far out of step with the legal community and the public itself is a consequence of this.

If you think the Court is merely "interpreting the constitution" then please explain how to interpret the 14th amendment without giving the Supreme Court wide latitude to protect minorities?

EDIT: Equal protection means whatever the Supreme Court says it means. They are a super legislature whether we like or not, and if they're going to be one, it sure would be nice if they cared at least a little bit about public opinion on matters of great controversy. And popular vote absolutely matters for legitimacy and "will of the people", even if the rules are currently stacked against one person one vote.
You still have the add the DS records for the hosted zones to the parent hosted zone...

The key for a hosted zone is managed using AWS KMS.
That's fine, I understand. I'm not telling you how to live your life. All I'll say is: there are SOC2 firms that will also tell you to turn DNSSEC on. You can tell them to go fuck themselves, and you'll be just fine. I don't know if that's the case with your NY-FI customers (none of the major investment banks are signed, nor are any of the exchanges, nor are the largest hedge funds and prop traders, but that's neither here nor there); only you know how to handle them.

I'm just here to establish that the mainstream security audits definitely don't require DNSSEC. :)
That's really immature.
Hugged on port 80/443 or 22
So, "If you make people's life better, more people will want a better life ?"
The 7600 perfectly illustrates the heart of AMDs problem.

AMD now simply copies Nvidia and makes their price a little lower but still way too high.

Even when Nvidias product is garbage - that's what AMD does too.

The 7600 is a microcosm of AMD and its strategy - don't built awesome cards at highly competitive prices - build whatever Nvidia is building and make it a little bit cheaper.

AMD and Nvidia's new GPUs are barely faster than the previous generation from years ago, and in many cases, slower.

It's not a winning strategy because its not giving customers what they want.
Try negotiating ssh compression and then sending terabytes of compressed zeroes. Might work for a badly implemented scanner.
Things are even more fun on the hardware-ish side. Some FPGA boards load a sort of bootloader circuit from on-board flash which enables a host to reflash the board over things like PCIe on power up. What do you call the design that does this? It's not really hardware (though the RTL describes hardware!) and it's not really software (though it is clearly a bootloader!). An even worse one is things like state machines because there's no real technical difference between a state machine which blinks an LED and a massive out-of-order processor; they're both just state machines of different scales.

One term that's sort of caught on for FPGA designs is "gateware" but people still argue about it.
Really ?

To me the biggest wtf is “party of Reagan” Republicans rooting for Russia
https://gitlab.com/leinardi/gwe
It is not. Deleting my spam folder is not the same as deleting yesterdays email.
> When people approach the limit of their abilities, time spent on tasks goes up exponentially.

This is an excellent observation.
If you're interested in exploring direct neuron + computer integration, Justin Atkin from The Thought Emporium is attempting to grow neurons on an electrode array. Here are two episodes that cover his work:

Growing Human Neurons Connected to a Computer - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2YDApNRK3g

Connecting Neurons to a Computer: The New Plan - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1C0qpqpAWc
The rules vary between games, but generally it's up to the community to decide what's allowed.

I'm not sure if I remember the details correctly, but I think a few months back there was a moist critical speedrun challenge where the game had to be patched using a third party tool in order to prevent crashes.

As long as the rules are clear and everyone is on a level playing field then it's fair.
If the problem is zoning that’s blocking density then why is the density of Cupertino (5,300/sq mile) almost double that of Houston (3000/sq mile)?

Houston is the example of why cities need zoning regs. No one wants to buy a home and have a high rise erected next to them.

Cheap housing comes from cheap land and cheap labor. Cupertino had neither of these and will continue to be expensive as long as there are companies paying high salaries in the area. It doesn’t matter if you allow high density housing if it costs $3M/single family home to acquire the land.
So you manually do what a package manager would do automagically and better. What do you think you are doing that is better than a program resolving dependencies, downloading h them and building them, putting them in the right location and tracking the versions used in a lock file
"would make Brazil a lot more stable economically (and even socially and politically) "

It's the other way around.

Brazil and Argentina especially should be rich, what's lacking is coherent social organization from top to bottom. Obviously it matters more at the top, but it has to be borne by regular people as well.

Same could be said of other Central/South American nations, but geographic factors and natural resources do give a material advantage that can be leveraged into a lot.

Consider that Canada, unlike most other so called 'advanced nations' - does not actually have lot of advanced industry. Research, yes, but 'applied' - no. And yet, because it has a 'free export card' with natural resources, it can import the equipment and materials necessary to support the rest of the regular domestic economy, which benefits from ultra boring politics, 'functional' bureaucracy, low levels of corruption.

Innovations can only be leveraged by organizations that have the coherent ability to make use if them.

The 'low hanging fruit' in Brazil is governance, though I hope this Wheat helps.
Log4j was kinda like that, abusing the logging.

Lately there’s been a number of hacks of smaller websites using methods of exfiltrating the session cookie via XSS or otherwise injecting malicious scripting (imagine if HN let you upload a script as a comment by accident, or would allow a script uploaded as a jpg).
How well does bariatric surgery work? We asked 11 people who got it
Use Role Based Access Control
> I think it'd be more just to tax the readers

The U.K. has legally and culturally normalised this. That’s not as easy in America, by design.
Vectorious: BLAS-accelerated linear algebra for TypeScript
Maybe they have tech that shows them our radar scanning patterns, so they know where to be.

And maybe other tech to make themselves less visible via vision, ie, light bending or something like that.

They might want to see how humans react to the possibility of aliens, without completely freaking the planet out by landing somewhere, walking out of a ship, and saying "take me to your leader".
I suspect the fear is a wee bit more primal, as in native Americans viewing European ships.
That CEO runs an organisation that delivered food for 90 million meals to residents of the greater Boston area last year (according to them).

That salary is on par with a senior engineer at a big tech company who, one might reasonably argue, does not contribute a similar good to the world.
Not asleep; they just directed their efforts at things that haven't worked out. With their APU lines it looked like they wanted to integrate GPUs completely into the CPU - that was hardly asleep to the importance of GPU compute.

The problem they ran in to looks to me to be that they focused on targeting a cost-effective low end market and were caught off-guard by how machine learning workloads work in practice - huge burst of compute to train, then much lower requirements to do inference. That isn't something they were strategically prepared for and that isn't something that software industry has seen before either.

Won't save them from market forces, but their choices to date have been reasonable.
How the Value Trade Has Been Smoked by the AI Frenzy
"Yes things other than SSH occasionally show up"

Like what?
Isn’t that just a rehash of “tragedy of the commons”?
I didn't say "gain control". You said that and put it in quotes.

Public health leaders, such as Debbie Birx, believed that the ends justified the means, and knowingly obfuscated the risk stratification by age in a cynical effort to get younger people to comply with lockdowns out of self preservation.

She wrote about this in her book, and also wrote that she and her colleagues KNEW that "2 weeks to flatten the curve" was a white lie, because otherwise the public would never have agreed to lockdowns in the first place.
Felt like the ending might've had a bit more oomph if the newest games were any good and not just generic Ubishit.
Sounds like they are missing out
While I have no interest in speed running any game, it is kind of entertaining to see what people come up with.
It's about the only good scenario of contact with ET.
The relevant performance metric here is memory amount and bandwidth.
Which seems to be true. Right now chasing homeless people from place to place is the subsidized action, and they sure seem to get more and more funds to do it.
The legislative branch can't heal itself, how do you get Wyoming to give up its power to cancel out California's?

Also, we have the 14th amendment, which basically bars discrimination. The Constitution is the super legislature and it's up to the Supreme Court to keep it that way by making sure states can't turn women or sexual minorities into second or third class citizens. Which they are currently doing.
Building a useful wheel isn't chipping it from stone. There is a lot of materials science and engineering evolved to make one, I wouldn't short change the effort in it. Anyway who cares if tech stagnates? I'd be more worried about a backslide where we lose hard won knowledge.
I’ve used Magnet for ages. It’s pretty expensive now though—I think it was only a couple of dollars when I bought it. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/magnet/id441258766?mt=12
Curiously light on details.
It is an unfortunate trend brought by Apple with no key travel. Part of the reason why I am still sticking to my MacBook Pro 2015.
Only under a perfectly free market system. A great many countries have export controls in place specifically for wheat and other vital commodities. States can also set price ceilings and floors. The US, for instance, passed the temporary Wheat Price Guarantee Act during WWI.
On the other hand, if the probability that you'll purchase something from an ad really is precisely zero, then the site would be better off blocking you entirely than serving you any traffic.
It's not just about me, it's about protecting the rights of any people you interact with, such as shopkeepers. In my opinion, their right to not get Covid supersedes your right to avoid the vaccine. If you are totally hermetic, then sure, I think it would be wrong to force you to be vaccinated, but it's hard to design policy with such granular carveouts without it becoming a bureaucratic mess.
I've always been amazed at how much content he writes every day. Typically 3 topics, often quite different, with hypothetical situations added, laymen explanations of esoteric topics, legal arguments each side is likely to bring along with some of their pitfalls. Footnotes and other articles of interest are also provided.
There is a Grand Canyon of difference between these two that goes well beyond simply "anything one doesn't like":

1. "Throwing eligible voters off the rolls, reducing polling places in left-leaning districts, and increasing polling places in right-leaning districts hijacked the election."

2. "Millions of fraudulent ballots manufactured in China (identifiable from the bamboo threads), 2,000 voter fraud mules (gathered from cell tower connections anywhere in the same square mile of a ballot drop box), and illegal immigrants in polling places stole the election."

The first are verifiable facts though the conclusion remains speculative.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-locations/so...

The second is 100% pure made up BS, making the conclusion a summation of BS. You know the second is nonsense when even internal emails at Fox News and Trump's own attorney general all loudly dismiss 2020 election steal conspiracy theories as pure cow manure. Even most of Trump's attorneys were VERY careful not to assert voter fraud in court due to their lack of evidence, even in front of Trump-appointed conservative judges. Those that went ahead were sanctioned by the court for lack of evidence. Rudy Giuliani kept saying in front of cameras there was evidence of widespread voter fraud EXCEPT in court in front of a judge, where he explicitly said, "This is not a fraud case."
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fox-news-hosts-allegedly-pri...
https://youtu.be/esS-6bHijjM?t=40
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/03/donald-trump...
https://youtu.be/Wuwl2p9TIDE

So yeah, I'd distinguish between the two. The first is speculative based on verifiable evidence while the second is demonstrably misinformation precisely because it lacks any evidence for its far more incendiary claims.
that is interesting, may not have, how in the world does the accounting work in this scenario, they just pool everything together similar to that critique of Amazon with mixed inventory or whatever that problem is called? I always thought these sorts of things could be mapped to some kind of FIFO ordering to establish ownership nitty gritty ownership. I pondered this mapping before thinking about taxes where taxes paid queue up into some governmental account, and taxes spent take the head of the queue which maps to some individual tax payer. Why can't we process and form accounting associations like this?
Who said anything about forcible?

People could be paid to move or otherwise offered lots of benefits and best quality of life opportunities to do so. And paying people to move would be much cheaper than the amount of money we spend now on the problem to overpay for stuff in expensive cities.

The actual reason why we don't do this easy solution, is because home prices arent the sole cause of homelessness.

Simply doing the voluntary, cheap, and easy solution of giving people the voluntary choice to live in a much higher quality home in a low cost of living area simply wouldn't solve the issue.
My impression of DARPA is that they found a lot of things without clear applications in mind. But even then, there is more to stealth than hiding from well equipped and organized groups.

Anyway, civilians could use a high-efficiency very low noise propulsion systems too.
Just wondering out loud why people use this word, but only for this issue. What else is so obviously true that one must have belief in it, lest they be considered a "denier"? Are there people who don't believe in the homelessness issue? Poverty-deniers?
And indeed, US intelligence has historically been in the "deliberately stoke UFO (UAP) conspiracy theories to protect our intelligence interests" business. I don't wanna be one of those people on the internet who says everything is a psyop, but when the US government produces evidence of UAPs, historically it has been, and our prior should be that it's misinformation probably meant to sabotage some other nation's intelligence efforts in a manner we don't have the context to understand (if I had to take a guess, which I'm not particularly qualified to do, by pretending they've been so thoroughly bamboozled by the current generation of aerial surveillance platforms that they think it's aliens, thereby delaying the deployment of improved craft. It's not a particularly compelling hypothesis, it's just the one I am aware of which I judge most likely.).
I have used https://openmodelica.org/. It's another one of those "invest substantial time understanding what they are doing, and you will likely be rewarded." Simple things are simple, but I found it took longer than I would have like to bang out e.g. a PID algo with a particular motor and load. If you want to try this, buy the book, and follow it to the end. Then keep learning, as you build more and more sophisticated simulators.
There are two ways to look at: (a) pay them more, and get the best results and less corruption (b) pay them less, and get the worst results with more corruption. In the states, politicians get paid, but they make through 'corruption' through revolving door, sinecure jobs for friends and family members, campaign contributions. In Singapore, politicians are paid better than the private sector, thereby reducing the corruption.
The "green warriors" today want all of us to go vegan, fly less, bike everywhere, live in dense cities, and buy new clothes once every 5 years. How do you rate the chances of them succeeding at any of those things, like they supposedly "killed nuclear power"?

Clearly someone else, with actual power and influence, wanted to kill nuclear. The environmentalists made for a convenient scapegoat. You fell for it too.
Can someone explain why the cache timing pattern gets such a strong signal for something so seemingly distant? Is this about memory locality or just the effects of a different “CPU workload” in general?

Also, what JS APIs are used to carry out such high resolution time measurements?
The Beepberry isn't far off: https://beepberry.sqfmi.com/ looks like it's got a Blackberry keyboard. Missing LTE, but since it's just a raspberry pi zero, you could probably hack one in directly to a serial port on the GPIO. Needs a case though, but 3D printing one shouldn't be hard.

But I think the general market for this kind of device is really tiny; phones and tablets can do this pretty well, and appeal to general consumers
If you're willing to accept the existence of magic, physics-defying UFOs, then at least some fundamentalists seem equally well grounded in providing an entirely different non-spacefaring-alien explanation for them.

At any rate, I don't think anyone claims to offer a complete explanation for everything that exists.
I imagine "housing first" works best when there is any housing to have.

SF, like much of California, has refused to build housing for half a century, while the population has kept increasing.

To house a homeless person there, someone else pretty much has to move out.
> RvW was decided based on constitutional grounds, which means that even if a legislature thought it was wrong, there would be no way to 'clarify' the matter.

That's not true at all, at least rules as written. If the supreme court interprets the constitution and the legislature doesn't like it they have the power to amend it. Thats the explicit check the legislature has on the courts. And yeah it's a huge PITA but we've also done it 27 times.

> In addition to those, there have been many times when the judges have (almost) all been from the same party (the 1930s come to mind); should those cases get deference?

Yes, absolutely. I have no idea why you thought I would say no to this.

Split decisions are fine for first rulings, it's how it goes, people disagree. But when it comes to the courts changing their mind down the road the bar needs to be higher. The previous ruling has been standing for however long without the legislature feeling the need to intervene. Unless there is some new information like a hypothetical ruling that was based on phrenology or an exceptional case where it's clear to everyone that it was a mistake and the logic doesn't actually follow you should give deference.

And look, I know this gives a huge amount of bias to the decision in the first ruling but without it the decisions of the court stop having any meaning. So what if they ruled <thing> is unconstitutional? I can keep doing it because the next time it might not be.

It is pants-on-head stupid that flagrantly violating the constitution on purpose after the law has been settled so you can go back to the supreme court and rule a different way even has a chance of working.

When you have half the court saying the decision as it was originally made was not only not made in error but that it was correct that really needs to be the legislature's problem.
US DOD does not experience competitive pressures towards competence. It does experience competition from other agencies attempting to acquire funds from Congress. Most other militaries are even less competent.