skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I did mean have the feature removed, I edited the comment (replaced "downgraded" with "have this feature removed". I actually originally typed "crippled" but wanted to phrase it more mildly). What I mean is to avoid the heterogeneous cores they chose to disable it in the performance cores rather than e.g. emulate or double pump it in the efficiency cores.

And they chose to give you efficiency cores + performance cores without avx512 on all consumer CPU's, rather than, what would be my preference, sell some with only performance cores with avx512 like their previous gen CPUs. I'd be ok with efficiency cores on a laptop, sure, but not on a desktop machine.

But AMD already gives plenty fast cores with avx512 now so I'm satisfied, I'm simply not an intel user anymore. Of course intel's choice still affects me anyway since the less consumers have avx512, the less software will make use of it.
I'm still salty that we needed him to put down time and energy in this, when Intel should have done the job... This license stuff was a major engineering tradeoff, a pain in the ass for many people, that should have been explained as clearly as Travis did, from the get go.
The life-changing magic of high-speed career sampling
It could make journals even more important, but in practice the reason paper mills exist is because journals aren't doing much (visible?) QA on papers, so spamming them with fake claims and auto-generated papers is a viable business model.

Journals unfortunately aren't stepping up to meet the challenge. I was writing articles about this problem several years ago and things haven't noticeably improved. This thread is full of people pointing out the obvious solution - take claim audit seriously and start by paying people to do professional peer reviews. Their actual solutions tend to look like spam filters for paper submission queues. It's enough to be able to say they're doing something, but not enough to actually make a big difference especially post ChatGPT.

I'm not so pessimistic, I think people learn to discriminate between sources. A lot of people right now are learning to generalize to "experts aren't" but it's a rather more nuanced understanding than the media like to make out when you dig in, for instance people understand that "expert" in this context usually means public sector funded academic or civil servant, and not e.g. a roughneck on an oil rig, some UI programmer at Apple, the guy who fixed their car last weekend. They learn that the first form of expertise is the type where making false claims can be beneficial for the people making them, whereas if you lie a lot about oil on an oil rig eventually something will explode.

I think we'll eventually get to a place where incentives are better aligned, for instance where data collection and aggregation is fully divorced from the people analyzing it. A lot of the distortion in science comes from the fact that academics need to collect data but aren't rewarded much for doing it, so once a dataset is collected it gets kept secret and that allows for a lot of dishonest game playing. It also means people are strongly incentivized to see things in the data that aren't really there. If data collection and analysis was fully divorced, those issues would go away (you'd get other problems of course but would they be worse?).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_property

> Private property is foundational to capitalism, an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit. The distinction between private and personal property varies depending on political philosophy, with socialist perspectives making a hard distinction between the two. As a legal concept, private property is defined and enforced by a country's political system.

> The distinction between private and personal property varies depending on political philosophy

That is a political statement, whereas what I described is a practical situation of life. Do you support the viewpoint that I replied to that it doesn't matter if someone owns something, even if they worked hard for it, that you should be able to come in and takeover because of discourse that happens there? If so we can disagree on that, there's no need to make it a wider political statement.
> You won't find the likes of Yudkowsky talking about this because they'd rather go on about their fan fiction than actually work to prevent real problems we may face soon. The fact that they've tricked some really smart people into going along with their shenanigans is extremely disappointing.

I think it's more disappointing that the fact that lots of smart people are extremely worried about something, doesn't cause onlookers to get worried - it causes them to be dismissive.

Yudkowsky and others had certain worries, as more people heard their arguments and technology improved, more and more smart people increasingly got convinced of these arguments. Instead of listening to them or considering that they might have a point, many people here are extremely dismissive - "they're tricked", "they watch too many sci-fi movies", "they're corporate shills", etc, even when all of these arguments can be refuted by two simple ideas - there are many different people with different backgrounds getting worried, and most of them weren't worried 10 years ago, but are worried now, meaning their point of view changed with growing evidence.

Let me ask you this: at what point will you be worried? What would it take? If some of the people who built these technologies are worried isn't enough to cause you to change your mind (or at least consider that they might have a point), what will?

Note: For the record, I'm also worried about your specific "today" worries. I just hate the dismissiveness of your last paragraph (and of a common sentiment on HN).
Pretty sure a similar sentiment was present when printing press came about. "Just think about all the poor souls exposed to all these heresies".
If you are on mac/ios then https://noteplan.co/ is exactly that: notes + todos + calendar. I use it daily.
Show HN: I made CSS Pro, a re-imagined Devtools for web design
> But it's pretty implausible that the process of learning wouldn't involve the brain having some representation of the thing it's learning, or wouldn't involve repeatedly "copying" that representation.

I think you can easily make a stronger statement:

We do know that art students spend many hours literally tracing other images in order to learn to draw. We do know that repetition is how the brain improves over time.

"Learn to draw better by copying." - https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/illustration/discover/le...

Based on that, seems pretty clear to me that the other commenters here would agree (regardless what the brain does internally) that at a minimum, art students are violating copyright many, many, times in order to learn.
Had no idea about this tech, very cool!
> Spam is spam over the imap protocol.

IMAP isn't used for sending email. You're thinking of SMTP.
This is far from pedantic. Calling something OOP when it isn't is a huge part of the problem.
Very good observation but I do wonder whether it’s the worst of both worlds or the best of both worlds - more the “eat the meat and spit out the bones” approach?
Milk-V Mars is a Raspberry Pi-sized PC with a quad-core RISC-V processor
SVG is such an under-appreciated graphics format. I will expand his great quote about graphics:

> a two-dimensional representation to utilize the integrative capabilities of the human visual cortex

into:

SVG is a re-usable two-dimensional representation of data to utilize the integrative capabilities of the human visual cortex.

In a sense canvas, png/jpg etc are to SVG what PDF is to HTML. An information black hole.

As an example of the information-retaining quality of SVG representations you could fairly easily imagine the reverse operation: SVG Images TO Postgres.
Ryzen 5 7600 die shots
It works transparently with any project using autotools/cmake/meson. (which is 95% of open source projects, and most likely most enterprise software) No need to convert your project to starlark BUILD files.
The deal is usually data for data. And it was quite literally (but inofficially) stated

"gives us your data, then we will continue to warn you about terrorist attacks".
The news culture in the US is toxic. It creates division and people react to the news rather than the policy. I believe Reddit has a similar effect by pushing moderates and centre-left people to the right.
Large IP holders could eventually just copyright every image that can exist if AI output is copyrightable - large IP holders can divide claims to the entirety of human illustrative output within a few years, without any significant white spots left. They sample the space, the company automatically publishes to their own platform and done.

Which claim is then violated is up to models again that classify and where it's a toss-up, companies will find a negotiated licensing price. A license for the models has to be paid by the competitor anyways, because they'll need to use it to classify their own creation against it to tell whether they're infringing.

That goes well with GPT6 running the legal show automatically.
I have approximately 35000 OneTab tabs "saved" to "visit them later." I haven't yet. (Dw, safely backed up in case I ever need to).

I also write stuff down in todo lists or notes apps etc and never revisit them, or revisit them weeks later. It's...annoying. I relate to this so much.
See also https://github.com/nelhage/llama and https://github.com/StanfordSNR/gg
Or at least you could try.

But that still makes the original commenters argument moot:

> Enterprise deals between these user generated content platforms and LLM platforms may well involve many billions of API requests, and the pricing is likely an order of magnitude less expensive per call due to the volume. The result is a cost-per-call that is cost-prohibitive at smaller scales, [...]

That speculation is not how things have been or were.
Here's the difference. Apollo has arguably more user value than Reddit itself. I wish Apollo worked as a client for HN, for example. It could easily be plugged into any similar platform and still be one of the best mobile apps ever built.

The others are just a-dime-a-dozen Reddit clients.
I agree with sharing the _present_ blame for _present_ actions, but the comment I replied to talks about the „Global North” having divided Africa some time ago, sharing the past blame with far more countries than are actually to be blamed.
Nope, invisible hand means not deliberately imposed incentives, but spontaneous creation of order from seemingly chaotic market forces.
If you like this then definitely check out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZIXDTH-sLA Fly with the Wind. It's amazing.
I can't play with a convertible laptop with multitouch screen, although it works fine in https://naqtn.github.io/WBBMTT/touch-tester.html . I'm using Firefox on KDE Plasma wayland.
The Java generator is pretty good, many big companies are using it for generating both client and server code, I'm especially happy with the Java Spring Boot generator, I've been using it for both reactive and 'standard' code generation.
OpenAI's plans according to Sam Altman
Why do you believe Reddit (or Twitter) knows less about its users? Users on Reddit literally self select into interest groups by visiting, (and with 100% confidence) subscribing to a subreddit. Someone not interested in surfing is not going to subscribe to r/surfing. But someone who casually browses r/surfing, or subscribes to r/surfing is very likely to have, at least casual, interest in it.

Twitter is similiar in that you’re self selecting who to follow, and who to engage with. Things you engage with have hashtags, have observable topics and categories that they generally post about, etc. If you’ve ever looked at the categories that you’re in after doing a Twitter data dump, you can see they know a _ton_ about you. What I don’t remember seeing in there is “confidence,” but it might just be that those numbers aren’t surfaced to users, or that it’s encoded in the ordering (and I don’t remember it).

The point is, Twitter and Reddit have largely the same types of signal that Facebook does, but certainly way less than Google. Facebook’s user engagement might be higher, but I’m willing to bet that the number of people using Facebook to follow their friends, and not random businesses and other accounts is greater, thus limiting confidence in understanding about someone’s preferences. What I mean is that my friends might never post about politics, and I might not follow political figures, or other talking heads, that suggest my affiliation…

In Google’s case, they drop a “pixel,” for tracking purposes, on 75% of the web (inflated estimate for effect), and analyze every accessible page on the internet with the goal of understanding what it says. As a result, they have far greater reach in what they can and do know about you…
We used to use this in a previous company. It reduced the build time from ~20 minutes to ~2 minutes; until a bug in the ld linker at the time (linking is not distributed - only compilation is) pushed it back up to 20 minutes. We had a hell of a time finding the issue, but luckily there was a newer versions of binutils available where it was fixed; and upgrading to it got the build time back under 2 minutes.

Fun times!
Women aren't more "neurotic", that simply isn't true (and jesus dude, 1950s much?).

There is extensive literature out there just a google away on the consistent misdiagnosis and under-treatment of women, both as a general trend and for particular diagnoses like heart attack or ADHD. The dismissal of "It's not a woman specific thing" belies the truth that there are women-specific biases against taking self-reported symptoms into account and receiving proper care, and data-collection biases where there simply isn't as much or as sufficient research in how the same disease presents differently in women.

Similar data exists for other groups (for example, pain treatment disparities for black people, because actual doctors with medical degrees think black people have "thicker skin" or "less nerve endings"), but we can acknowledge several kinds of systemic failure of medicine to meet the needs of whole classes of patients without undermining the rightful complains of those individual groups.
Nice ontological classification thank you !
> What's left is a very liberal echo chamber. All of the seemingly worst ideas from the left are stated as fact and voicing a dissenting opinion can quite literally get you banned.

A friend of mine is moving to Canada, another to Germany, both went to Reddit to ask for help, and what they got back was anti-immigration tropes of all kind (from "go away you cheap labour, you are stealing our jobs" to "go away you rich tech worker, you are gentrifying my town").

While social media are generally cesspools of psychological deragement, racism and xenophobia, I keep hearing people complaining about some undefined left wing bias because the occasional weirdo with pink hair complains about capitalism or fascism in r/weirdoswithpinkhair or r/randosthatcomplainaboutcapitalism.
Huh, I didn't know Minecraft was inspired by a Zachtronics game!
Fucking hell... GPU is now as expensive as all the rest of the PC combined...
> Is this guy Aes Sedai?

Haha having just finished the Wheel of Time, I'm super tickled by this reference.

It doesn't seem to be too common, only two uses of it on HN in the past year (at least, found by searching for the phrase "Aes Sedai")
The initial AVX-512 implementation brought a lot of issues with it. The biggest problem was that Intel used 512-bit ALUs from the beginning and I think it was just too much that time (initial 14nm node) - even AMD's Zen4 architecture, which came years after Skylake-X, uses 256-bit ALUs for most of the operations except complex shuffles, which use a dedicated 512-bit unit to make them competitive. And from my experience, AMD's Zen4 AVX-512 implementation is a very competitive one. I just wish it had faster gathers.

Our typical workload at Sneller uses most of the computational power of the machine: we typically execute heavy AVX-512 workloads on all available cores and we compare our processing performance at GB/s per core. This is generally why we needed a faster decompression, because before Iguana almost 50% of the computational power was spent in a zstd decompressor, which is scalar. The rest of the code is written in Go, but it's insignificant compared to how much time we spend executing AVX-512 now.

(I work for Sneller)
Indeed. No means no.
Superbly said - “it's really the act of letting go”

I think if we look at note taking as a sorting / filtering function, then maybe this article isn’t that painful to read..
They _really_ should give a dump of all the torrents, magnet links and seed/leech counts...
Ideally, people will stop ascribing thought and intent to a clever IVR script.
They also think what Reddit does is "only serve large amounts of text" oh where should I start with how wrong this is

I'm sure not even HN "does only that" and even that it does with a lot of help from caching, etc
https://hasura.io/ is pretty good, easy to containerise and self host, it offers more than CRUD but does CRUD very well by default. I use it as a backend in one of my side hustles.
A web-of-trust with ONLY people I trust/know personally means a small island. Maybe useful in some VERY limited context, but definitively not in general.

Let's state instead a fictional scenario: you got an email from John Doe, is really from him? Well, if it's signed with a GPG key signed by a government authority probably yes (at least, if it's not him he have successfully steal card&credentials to sign his key or something even more complex). Did you know the small "key-icon" GMail offer in it's WebUI for "trusted messages" from some well-known vendors? Well, with this you can replicate the same with anybody in Germany, trusted not by a private company but by a government authority.

It's still marginal since most would not use such system, but potentially it's a pretty logic idea and a very good news.
I was quite sure you meant to say prefixing i. (which no longer works) but tried going to reddit.com/.i anyways and it actually works!
I hope it stays operational, but surely they will also nuke it eventually :/
Great idea, but as it seems still only available on Unix platforms; I eventually implemented my own build system which is also C, even leaner and works on all platforms.
ah standard warez drama

maybe the p2p groups should copyright the encodings
IMO drones should yield to manned aircraft. Currently, there are defined rules about rights of way for manned aircraft. However, even a manned aircraft that has the right of way is going to do everything they can to avoid a collision, because it's their ass on the line.

Since both aircraft have a strong incentive to avoid collision, there are fairly few mid-air collisions.

Now they want to give drones the right of way with no skin in the game. They can just go from waypoint to waypoint, never looking for anything, and if they hit something, they won't die, and they won't even get sued. If they're feeling particularly callous, they could even sue the other pilot's estate for the cost of their crashed drone.
from a technical (marketing) point of view, it works. I'd even say it's an example of what developer tools should strive to emulate: plain English, clear CTAs, and social proof.

on the other hand, well, yes, it's all about Copilot X. business is business?
> If you are going to use someone else's work in order to make something that you are going to profit off of, I believe that original author should be compensated. And should also be able to decide they don't want their work used in that way.

You're posting on HN. Are you expecting a check from YCombinator?

> Regardless, copyright is about distribution. If the a model trained on copyrighted material is considered a copy or derived work of the original work, then distributing that model is, in fact, copyright infringement (absent a successful fair use defense). I'm not saying that's the case, or how a court would look at it, but that's something to consider.

The government is what ultimately decides what copyright means. And if the court wouldn't look at it that way, then it's not "in fact copyright infringement".
We have in recent memory seen valid criticisms against, for example, Kamala Harris dismissed as racist/sexist, criticisms of Ilhan Omar as "islamophobic", criticisms of George Soros as "anti-Semitic", criticisms of drag shows for kids and grown men in girl's dressing rooms as "transphobia" and "literal violence".

"Hate speech" is the new "think of the children". An easy (and socially acceptable, apparently) way to silence and smear critics.
I wonder if this is worth it. Such a ship is a large one-time investment - just like connecting landmasses with a cable is, which would be a lot more efficient long term I imagine.
I've been working with Speakeasy for a couple of month now to produce client libraries for our customers to use. They've finally made an OAS-based code generator that's great. In fact, it's getting even better with useful functionality being released on an almost biweekly basis. I would strongly recommend Sagar and the Speakeasy team to anyone looking to support high quality client libraries for your customers.
Parse Don’t Validate?
https://lexi-lambda.github.io/blog/2019/11/05/parse-don-t-va...
On my Android phone it does work in Firefox.
Here's a list of ULEZ exemptions [1]. I don't see any mention of delivery vehicles or luxury cars.

[1] https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/ultra-low-emission-zone/dis...
A simple test reveals: Bot or human?
Hey ChatGBT, can you make a python-program that implements the finnish word "putoamaisillaan"?

ChatGPT
Certainly! I can help you create a Python program that implements the Finnish word "putoamaisillaan". However, it's important to note that "putoamaisillaan" is not a standalone word but rather a conjugated form of the verb "putoamainen," which means "to be falling" or "to be about to fall." I'll provide you with an example program that uses this word in a sentence. Here it is:

def putoamaisillaan():
print("Tikka oli putoamaisillaan puusta.") # "The woodpecker was about to fall from the tree."

putoamaisillaan()
In the above program, we define a function called putoamaisillaan() that prints a sentence containing the word "putoamaisillaan." When you run the program, it will call the function and print the sentence "Tikka oli putoamaisillaan puusta," which translates to "The woodpecker was about to fall from the tree" in English.

Feel free to modify the program or ask if you have any specific requirements or further questions!
Except it doesn't work.

chatGPT4 answers the questions in the article correctly; Even if I vary the question the answers are still correct.
>Is it ever significant to know?

When making weight for a sport. Any more time than necessary spent dehydrating is energy and recovery you're not going to have for the event.
Magnet linking is rather like standing on a street corner and regularly yelling "have you got any cannabis"?

Here's a random RARBG magnet link that may or may not work

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:468043aa374080fed5ff65e4cd8d4fed002986b5&dn=Rizzoli.And.Isles.S05.1080p.WEBRip.x265-RARBG

It doesn't link to a file or embed any tracker names but it does name a 1080p HEVC (x265) encoded season pack of season 5 of a US police procedural drama (which is excess and unrequired but humans do like readable names)

What it does provide is a unique hash code that matches the exact torrent ... should you find it.

When you add that magnet link to your torrent client it triggers the act of polling any public trackers your client knows about and any peers that have "hit me up about magnets" enabled.

Ideally word spreads and eventually some other client | tracker hits you back with word of other peers that at least have some cannabis .. (err, bits of Rizzoli&Isles Season 5 HEVC pack).