skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I’m confused by your defensiveness. What I express has the same browser support, but is correct (rather than leaving a tiny gap that is theoretically possible to encounter, though vanishingly improbable in reality), doesn’t depend on esoteric knowledge of the meaning of a 0.02px difference, and sticks with just the one magic number which is obviously desirable for various maintenance purposes. On the downside, “not all and (min-width: 480px)” is an idiosyncratic spelling, and you run the risk of people reaching for “not (min-width: 480px)” instead, which works in current browsers but sheds support for somewhat older browsers (with Safari being the last to get it, only a couple of months ago).

(In the wild, I’ve encountered exact-value overlap, which is obviously wrong and very easy to trigger, −1px, which is obviously wrong and fairly easy to trigger, −0.1px which is fairly safe, and −0.01px, but I don’t recall ever encountering −0.02px.)

If the article had used a negated media query, would you be arguing for using a non-negated .98?
It's in the "Tools" menu: "Remove Background ⇧⌘K"
so I guess you just jumped to the comment section without reading the report ?
Actually feedback from non-tech folks (assuming you as such) is very welcomed, so thank you!

The product is at early stage and I will be adding more texts of all sorts (like disclaimers) and features. Data is truly not shared with anyone, it's in a dedicated server, but it's NOT in an encrypted database for now. It will be when it's developed.

All that is collected from users is their email address, since you can sign up using Google and Github auth only. Behind this auth one can create apps, environments and access tokens. Afterwards, requests to the API are open under access token.

Product is free for now, thus no pricing info at the moment.
You could give targeted help to the ones that needs it, it would be more efficient to help them brush their teeth than just adding fluoride to the water that everyone drinks.
Back in de 80's, to double the data on a C64/1541 floppy disk, I used a hole punch to create a hole on the other side and flipped the disk.
There's one going on right now!

(Until August 9.)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Eras_Tour
> o the folks not understand what they do, or are they just bluntly ignorant of it?

They don't care. And yes I've heard stories of people "finding a service" that does something basic and just dumping their whole traffic onto it

(of course they play the victim once they're found out)
Mein Kampf has never been banned from possession in Germany. It just has not been published in the post-WW2 decades because the copyright holder, the Free State of Bavaria, decided to just not publish it and withhold the right to do so from anybody else. One could readily purchase, sell, or trade old copies at an antiquarian bookstore.

It's now in the public domain, so one could even set up a little publishing company and publish it oneself.

And it's an incredibly awful book, measured to all the 'fame' it holds in certain circles.
"Blowing the cover"

Lol. I just stated what's already out there. It's like "blowing the cover" on the voice actor of Spongebob Squarepants...
The parenting-adage version of this is "hear everything, do what you want"
I would [have] reach[ed] to AWS techies. The services of archive.org are known and important enough for the AWS folks to chase down the sources and/or initiate some action against the perpetrators, malicious or not as they might be.
Performance Engineering of Software Systems (6.172)
Discussion on fluoride is interesting, but isn't the real news the censorship of the research results?
Proof-of-work was originally introduced by Adam Back's hashcash, to fight email spam.

Bitcoin is an evolution of that idea applied to digital cash.

https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Hashcash
What an incredibly well versed notice from archive.org! Clear, no assumptions, no irony, no accusations, but only reaching out as they request from us.
Yeah, thanks, I'll look into it.
As an aside, to what degree does WASI exist _now_? The spec seems to be in a state of flux as to what the language the spec is written in is, and the language new proposals are written in seems to have grown futures? On the other hand, as far as I can tell, the latest draft spec doesn't look to have support for UDP or scalable notification (epoll, kqueue, etc.), so is that really what people are using their existing software with?

Docker's great win is that you don't even need to recompile your software to use it, much less port it to what's essentially a new non-POSIX operating system.
Yes, ChatGPT has the potential to build real, sophisticated apps. However, it requires good input and sometimes may require manual corrections to ensure desired outcomes.
Explains some things about Hungary though
AI will slightly drain the swamp of higher ed
There are various underfunded digital archives in the EU and elsewhere that have legal duties to preserve online content relating to their specific countries.

They may be "of very questionable value" to you but your solution to remove funding from them to channel it to a much wealthier organisation in a wealthier country is neither ethical, legal or practical.
There's no export feature yet. It's a major feature to be implemented this summer.
You could work with one laptop and one Mac Mini.

I've used many KVMs over the years, and they generally work fine to let you switch from one device to another, but they do assume you won't be working on multiple devices simultaneously.

I can confirm that the external Magic Keyboard and Magic Trackpad do both work very well, as good as or better than anything integrated into a laptop. And since they charge via USB, you could easily just keep them plugged into the USB ports on the KVM device -- if you were to go that direction. If you want them to feel like a unified single keyboard, then 12 South has you covered with the MagicBridge [2].

I think what you really want is a software KVM solution that lets you share the same keyboard and mouse across multiple machines, each of which is being simultaneously displayed on your screens. Just drag your mouse from one screen to the next and you're suddenly working on the other computer.

This is what Universal Control [0] is for. There are alternatives [1] like Barrier or Synapse, but I think UC will probably be the best Mac-native solution in this space.

[0]: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT212757
[1]: https://alternativeto.net/software/apple-universal-control/
[2]: https://www.twelvesouth.com/products/magicbridge
I think that's improved, at least according to product literature (I haven't tested it myself), however:

The latest generation of small under-sink reverse osmosis filters claim to waste only 1 gallon for every 2 gallons of usable water. Still bad but much better than before.
Can you elaborate please? I'm not really familiar with webscale, so it's a No probably. :D
Yep! Being nice takes very little effort. Being kind requires thoughtfulness. It's possible to be nice and not kind, and also possible to be kind and not nice.

For example, if I worked on your team, and always gave harsh PR feedback, I wouldn't be nice, but if I always sent feedback to your manager after you fixed up the PRs, saying how rigorous you were in your followups, and how good your code is, I'd be kind.

On the other hand, if I always gave you positive feedback on good things you did in the code, didn't call out nits in your code, I'd probably be nice. If months later I went back and looked at your codebase and it was a mess due to lots of little things adding up and told your manager you coded poorly, then I wouldn't be kind.
What do you mean? I thought these are synonyms. (English is not my native language though)
I don't really understand it tbh. I was with my partner for 10 years before we got married (for a visa) and we had 2 kids by then. It never occurred to me that I wasn't committed in every sense, and having that piece of paper made no difference. I kind of think that if you feel you need that official thing then it's a signal of not really being committed or loving in the first place, but that's more of a belief I'd turn on myself than think about you or others.
The very same machines that serve http can also seed torrents. If those machines go offline, they also take down the http endpoint
Had I wanted to say rust was only filled with zealots, I would have said so, instead of differentiating advocate from zealot.

Further, most languages barely have any advocates, let alone zealots. Rust is a massive outlier here.

My statement is accurate, valid, makes sense, and is predicated upon observation.
> The concentration is the same in both cases so the adult is getting 30X more.

That should read 15-30 times more, according to your own figures. And then, the baby's mass is about 15-30 times less than the adult, so at the end you are in the same ballpark again, percentagewise.
It also performed the very important function of setting up a parallel cable connection to my brother’s computer so we could play DOOM together.
The criterion is that p in B must halt before returning to a Program Counter value (what they define as repeating a Turing machine "state"). That's the length of the program text. So, I have no idea why they are talking about polynomials, it looks linear because the program counter has 1 value per line of code in a program text. If not, I would like to know where my misunderstanding could be. Clearly the authors think the paragraph is a simple, obvious step not worth discussing clearly (they say something about running the program for n steps being sufficient, but they do not outright, explicitly say why it would be polynomial, etc.)
I used to use it until a year ago or two, via a fido->usenet gw and then reading the groups in Thunderbird. It is alive, but dwindling and is (sorry to say) very little like what it was in the middle of the 90s.
I’ve been thinking about this recently - fluorapatite is stronger than hydroxyapatite when it bonds to enamel, and less soluble by acid. But fluoride doesn’t occur in any natural processes in the body - while hydroxyapatite is a perfect biomimetic - very safe, you can swallow it safely - and also works great in toothpaste to remineralise teeth.

Currently using BioMin F (fluorapatite - very little fluoride due to a novel delivery mechanism but still) but considering switching to BioMin C (nanohydroxyapatite)
The term I used was intentionally vague, referring broadly to the people who make up a given community, society or civilization. Everyone living in a given country, for example. Everyone within a respective health authority's region of responsibility. The people who make up the society in which we live, and with whom we share some degree of dependence and implicit/explicit responsibility to help ensure the survival of.
I think the previous poster is reacting to the fact that according to the article, if these laws are successfully passed, then meatpacking and bar work will, legally, be jobs for children.
so I guess you didn't read the first part of his comment where he said "Not reading reports..."
Skeletal fluorosis is well known to occur in regions where the natural drinking water has high fluoride content, e.g. in some regions from India and China.

You need search no further than Wikipedia.

I am not aware of any study about the incidence of fluorosis in places where the drinking water is fluoridated artificially, but it would be very difficult to do such studies, due to the lack of comprehensive past statistics, to the many confounding factors and because only few of the existing cases are detected. When someone heals a bone fracture they almost never do additional complex tests to determine if it was normal for the fracture to happen or its likelihood was increased by a condition like fluorosis.

In any case no such studies are really needed, because when you have an activity like ingesting fluoride, for which there is absolutely no evidence of benefits and no known mechanism by which it could provide benefits, but there is weak evidence that it might be harmful and there are known mechanisms by which it may be harmful, then there is no rational doubt whether that activity should be done or not.
What does it mean? You see other partners?
> As a man, I seriously don't know how women do it, and how many even do it multiple times.

Are you aware you are praising women for something any female in any species does ? Sure it is not always easy, but if a woman has children it's (unless some quite obvious reasons) because the benefits outweighs the inconveniences. This is not some heroic deed.

> The notion that two people make equal sacrifices when they have a child is laughable.

You only focus on the short-term (potential) medical issues, but if you take into account the long-term and a broader view, things average out and can even be a net benefit for women through the current laws in most western countries.
The ARM Cortex-A520 was announced yesterday. Apparently ARM realised that the A510 was too big, and removed an ALU unit (back to two like the A55).

News: <https://www.anandtech.com/show/18871/arm-unveils-armv92-mobi...>

Discussion: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36109916>
America may give Silicon valley a blank check to do whatever they want but China keeps a tight control and the EU loves to bully them with regulations.
The State always wins.

The Achilles heel is that nobody actually fucking LIKES these "tech barons" and nobody would vote for them if they ran for office. He's right that they are removed from the real world. Even a C level politician would demolish them in town hall meeting.
Screening by mammography increases the incidence of breast cancer:
https://twitter.com/daniel_corcos/status/1659854579993903106
I guess it's arguable whether better dental health, plus cancer, could be considered a benefit. Would heavily depend on the rates of cancer or other harms vs. the rates of improved dental health. Certainly without thinking too deeply about it, childhood cavities would seem vastly preferable to nearly any sort of cancer unless the risk is minuscule.
Thomas Paine had a few choice words to say in answer your question, though I won't repeat them here.

I don't agree with him on that point, but I haven't come across any other practical wisdom that accounts better for how to deal with people who do not give up power willingly.

I continue to hope, but then again I'm an eternal optimist at heart.

Systems could enforce it independently such as currency indirectly, if you required a funding plan for any proposed program. It does require functioning arms of government though and printing more money than tax revenue obviously not being an option. Corruption would need to be minimized with harsh penalties and not allowing conflicts of interest. Basic stuff.
>>You can't just do it by strong assertion.

Sir, this is the internet. Sources are for the weak. Just type your response so it’s passionate and angry and people will believe you!
> Now that many people can easily take videos/photos on there phones

Vampires are known to not show up properly in mirrors, so they may have properties that interfere with smartphone camera optics as well.

Though here's an iPhone ghost photo from 2015, blamed on "an oddity from an iPhone's imaging capture":

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150629-the-intriguing-h...
If you're looking for present-day windows equalent, Total Commander (https://www.ghisler.com/) is excellent -daily driver for me since '99.
What’s wrong with Honk Hong and South Korea ? 90% says they’re very or rather happy and thinks only 20% of their peer does. I wonder if that’s linked to a cultural thing. Any Asian expert have an idea here ?
I think you misunderstand my point and unfortunately come off as not civil in your reaponse, I'm not for civil forfeiture at all. Don't steal. I was surprised you support civil forfeiture and even have an air of mightier then thou since you believe the things stolen to go to a good cause.

You're also conflating criminal forfeiture with civil in your example.
What were your symptoms?

(asking for info, not doubting anything!)
Don’t test in production is the remediation. And if you don’t know that already you need to go back to law school.
>but maybe consider the possibility that others are getting something valuable out of this that you've missed?

Of course some people are getting something valuable. Marriage works out great for some people, and of course those people are happy to tell the world how great marriage is because it worked out so well for them.

For other people, however, it's a complete disaster.

Basically, marriage is a huge gamble. The odds are better than going to the casino, but not by that much. If you win, great, but there's a huge potential to lose, big. There's a reason the divorce rate is so high, and more recently why more people just aren't getting married in the first place. People try the "dating" process to attempt to mitigate the huge risk that comes with marriage, in an attempt to "vet" the other person before making such a huge commitment, but there's countless cases of people spending significant time dating someone before marriage, only to wind up getting divorced after a few years anyway, so clearly 1-2 years isn't really enough time to get to know someone well enough to determine if the relationship will work out, and people just don't live long enough (and more importantly, women aren't fertile long enough) for couples to spend 10-20 years dating before marriage and kids.
Oh, you're right that the criterion for B seems to ignore tape contents. I agree that B is a very uninteresting subset of programs from a programming perspective...
There would be the need of huge (leakproof) containers for the compressed air recovered, from a back of the envelope calculation, we are talking of 100,000-150,000 cubic meters of compressed air.
As I pointed out, it's not a reasonable negotiation tactic as following through on the threat would accomplish nothing - and both sides know that. Even if you succeed with your threat and some of your people are allowed in and then the border is closed again - what then? Nuke your own people?

All cooperative moves are much better than extended suicide - for both sides.
I feel like we should always continue to question things like this - never fall into the trap of thinking we know for sure (one way or another) what the answer is.
Hey! Thank you for the feedback. Yes, it's very limiting (for now) since it's a free to use product right now.
Indexing is done internally because the data model is arbitrary. This is key difference when we speak just about persistence. You will be making an app about groceries, someone else about movies. Indexing will be based upon your entities and sub-entity types.
Not a very object measurement of happiness, especially without situational or cultural context.
What's the connection between the first and second claims you make? does SLS cause cavities?
Yes, DDoS attacks are spam over the http protocol. Spam is spam over the imap protocol. Overwhelming a server with too many download requests, is not spam but it has the same effect. Calling the police every ten minutes because the door sounds like someone tries to break in, is spam.
Yup, and it shows that most people are happy but still think that most other people are unhappy
It all depends on the nature of the work you are doing.

One thing is to own a service that's used by 10 MAU and you extend the service with a job that calls the OP's service 100 times a second. That's bad, you are using way more than you need.

Another thing is to own a mobile app used by 10M MAU and you embed the OP's service into the app. That's not bad intention, you just added a new service to your app. The problem is that the OP's definition of "unlimited" is not really unlimited.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_imperative

> Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.
That's a bit misleading. The specifics vary by province. eg. Common Law kicks in after 3 years living together (in a marriage-like relationship) in Ontario, and after 2 years in BC.

Revenue Canada has their own definition of common law, for tax purposes only (not litigation), which is independant of that and is 12 months.
It's incredibly contagious and it's incredibly hard to kill. It doesn't appear to occur at all in animals, so that's not the reservoir. It's just that if one person has it, everyone around them will be infected if haven't either been vaccinated or already had it.

We did a good job of eradicating smallpox which is viral, and diptheria and whooping cough are almost gone (they'll probably never totally go, bacterial diseases are like that), polio isn't really a thing. If you look at a graveyard from the beginning of the 20th century when they started recording such things on gravestones (and maybe a ways back into the 19th) you'll see a lot of children died very young - pretty much all of that was diptheria.

And that brings me round to the last point - we're lucky because pretty much no-one dies or has life-changing aftereffects from measles. Diptheria killed just about everyone that caught it. Polio killed just about everyone that got it, or left them with crippling nerve damage. There are people alive today with disabilities caused by polio, and they were the lucky ones.

So, while it was pretty horrible watching my beautiful little baby boy get stabbed in the legs, two at a time, to get it done quickly - but you don't get over the instinct to defend your child from someone hurting them easily - I'm glad he will never have any of a laundry list of preventable diseases, even the ones that just give you some itchy spots and a few days off school.
I'll definitely consider this and make a note.
Failure Detection/Fault Tolerant Control of a Jet-Powered Flying Humanoid Robot
Never heard of this Rushkoff guy, but he seems not 100% OK himself. Very weird tone throughout. e.g.

>They’re torturing themselves now, which is kind of fun to see.
adhd here. can confirm.
Donut: OCR-Free Document Understanding Transformer
I thought you couldn't pirate Photoshop anymore?
This is not my personal experience. If I let a tab alone and that tab has a looping GIF then Firefox get slower and unresponsive (and eat memory).

You can try it with an imgur link: https://imgur.com/gallery/gom01RZ (sfw, vid/loop of a boa constrictor drinking water from a glass).
I realized only now that with this post I contributed to the GPT-chatter, sorry world!
I didn’t know that game. That’s a cool concept!
Link to paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16075
Some basic structure for 6 hours with 4x30 mins for what comes up unplanned
they are all correct
Microsoft has made Azure Linux generally available
'feels rigged'.

My friend, the entire thing is rigged from top to bottom, from the time you see the ad, until you are back at home.

The only way to win is to accept the grift on those terms.
Quest 3 hands-on confirms Meta’s building a ‘far thinner and lighter’ headset