skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They aren't dumb. They are professionals who do this sort of thing for a living.

That said, most companies don't etch their own boards. That part of the build process could be skipped by sending your schematic out to one of the boutique board fabrication places. They aren't terribly expensive and it avoids having to deal with nasty chemicals. The article even mentions this and I would highly encourage it myself, at least until you have a few boards under your belt and are feeling more comfortable with diving deeper into the process.
Hiring a few hundred competent mods, plus management, can easily triple that figure, so it would likely need some serious backing.
Doesn't that solve the problem of where can I buy this? Similar to social media containing links to purchase advertised wares.

Sounds pretty neat if it's accurate.
They think the same as someone buying SPX that has many similar companies in the index.

The less snarky answer is that each companies is run by creative people who will see different opportunities and pivot differently: they are not all the same company copying each other
No, jupytext converts the binary .ipynb format into a text format that can be diffed and reasoned about like any other code in a git repo. It hooks into jupyter lab such that it automatically keeps both the .ipynb and text source version of a document in sync. How you review the text version is up to whatever source control system and other tools you use.
That works great if you're starting from scratch, but not so much if you're on a brownfield project. The way the generators are written, even generating a new endpoint can't be done after code has been written because it generates a whole file with route stubs.
For those hosting their own Reddit/libreddit instance doesn't that reduce anonymity to Reddit by having only a single user? I have been using public ones to mix my traffic in with others.
I'm trying to go in this direction with an API I'm building at the moment in PHP: https://github.com/smolblog/smolblog-core/tree/feature/api-b... It uses a combination of definition-in-code (also used to translate the endpoint classes to the outside framework), reflection, and PHP annotations to generate the OpenAPI spec which I'm loading into Swagger to do testing.
Shhh, the Windows 11 team might hear you.
It would be cool if the path animated in reverse slowly when out of bounds and allowed user to regain control.
You could use this argument to either support or refute all world religions. I don’t understand how you could argue that large numbers of people can’t be wrong (see most of history)
> The real value is the community generated content, and yeah, that's a commons.

According to which court or government?

I'm not familiar with every country, but I don't think a single G20 country or the UN has spelled out anything like that.
> In my experience as a software engineer
> every one of those companies Jira was used most heavily by software engineers.

You don't see the correlation?

Anecdote for anecdote, I've mostly seen Jira used as a help desk tool. Back when I was in school, the professors used it to assign students to classes.
Sure. We can also control those variables. Youtube-dl has a small javascript interpreter to figure out the audio and video URLs that YouTube generates for every client. In this thread it was also pointed out that people can use headless chrome.

It's simple. If they allow public access to their site at all, there's pretty much nothing they can do to stop any of this.
Originally they were for lighting, where each pixel of a triangle is shaded based on its illumination. When other kinds of graphics processing functions were added (eg manipulating geometry) they kept the name.
Trump captured on tape talking about classified document he kept
I'm running Vicuna on a free 4core Oracle VPS, and it's perfectly usable for a Discord bot. Responses rarely take more than 15 seconds with <256 max token limit, and the responses are much more entertaining than GPT 3.5. I'm not using the streaming API my server software[0] offers, but if I did it would probably load somewhere between the speeds of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. It's more or less the same time a human would take to compose the same message.

So... not exactly a serious use-case. But it's what I'm using, and now I'm saving 10s of dollars on inferencing costs per month!

[0] https://github.com/go-skynet/LocalAI

I'm also using this to improve acceleration - https://cloudmarketplace.oracle.com/marketplace/en_US/adf.ta...
Of course they didn't build privacy/security measures. And it was the right business call as well.

By not building privacy and security aspects they were able to invest in growing marketshare. That growth enabled their $1b Amazon acquisition. Had the company slowed down its growth to build privacy protections they may have missed out on that exit.

A $5m fine does nothing to ensure other companies do the right thing.
This wouldn't really be an issue for there to still be a massive advantage to even a simple caching layer.

Imagine one has 10 request for thread {X} every second (probably a massive under estimation of the actual traffic). If you cache that single thread with a lifetime of a second you have instantly cut out 90% of your API usage for that thread.

Obviously the final benefit depends on what the actual distribution of {users} per {threads} per {time} -- but if your goal is to shave redundant API requests than it definitely makes sense, especially if the alternative is untenable in terms of cost.
I'd be careful - some users on this forum don't like it when others expend their energy to makes sure that headlines are accurate.
Alcohol solution and a microfibre wipe?
I have always assumed it's that originally their purpose was to provide the shade of each pixel.
I'm really surprised that board is only $3 given how expensive off the shelf inverters are. I would think there would be enough competition in the pure sine inverter market to drive prices down, but I guess it's just small enough to not function optimally.
I don't think you nessairly need to give up interop.
Kinda like his JavaScript can call wasm modules. The compiler would need to know how to use nixpkgs, but the user could write their derivations any way they see fit.
What I wonder is:

Load the source code to all versions of unix, with all licenses.

"write me a version of unix"

Since there is no model copyright and the result was written by AI the software is now in the public domain.
I used to whitelist The Deck. It didn't stop them from going under. The last refuge I actually have is advocating for public policy to make data collection without explicit consent illegal. Otherwise the shortlist of sites I can use without engaging with tracking behavior is extremely short.

Edit: I think this idea of the ad-blocking user as perpetual freeloader is a nice fiction that helps ad company execs sleep at night. If you ask companies why they don't ask for explicit consent to tracking, the answer is often: "because no one would agree to it". But there's this game being played where ad companies pretend that no "good" user minds what they're doing as they continue to push the envelope of what's acceptable.
Everything you listed is incredibly challenging, expensive, and subject to multiple disasters.

For example, you normally need to sign a 5 year lease. Lose your business after 6 months? You’re still on the hook for another 54 rent payments of $2,000/month or whatever. (HN readers in Alpharetta, Georgia will gasp at rent that high. Readers in San Jose will laugh at how naïvely low that number is.)

Local, county, and state compliance takes months to understand and you will make expensive mistakes, period. The air conditioner compressor will need replacing at the worst possible time. Your outlets might be 6” off and need reinstalling because the previous tenant was grandfathered in. Permitting will cost way more than you thought. If you’re lucky, it will only be 1000 or so extra dollars. If you’re in a highly regulated city, you may be off by $10-$15,000. You may even have to sign hire someone else just to handle the permitting for certain infrastructure improvements. No matter how many times you try to ask city officials what’s gonna come up next because do you want to anticipate the permit issues, they will claim ignorance, or fail the answer completely.

Insurance will be expensive or just not available in some cases.

Your parking lot seemed pretty big but you’ll learn there aren’t enough ADA-compliant spaces. The dude you hire to resurface the parking lot might claim to understand ADA requirements but forget about them—or just disappear with your 50% down. Six months later he’ll call you after rehab looking for work because he’ll have forgotten he ripped you off.

I promise that if you survive to the point of getting to hire people they’ll disappear without warning or have a breakdown if misgendered. They’ll be shocked to the point of resigning if the Sysco truck is 3 hours late they’ll need to stay too restock and miss a watch party with their friends.

Your most reliable cashier will do fine for a year and a half. Her car will break down, she’ll ask for an advance to get it fixed and you’ll readily give it, feeling good about yourself. Then she’ll ask you in another month, then two weeks after that, and you’ll find yourself reluctantly telling her you aren’t an ATM. She will guilt you about it and maybe complain to her coworkers, who will also ask for advances.

You probably won’t have the two hours a week needed for bookkeeping and will underestimate your taxes by a lot.

You’ll walk in one day and find business down by 40% because of Yelp review bombing or a competitor reporting your business as closed permanently. That will take multiple days to fix because Google and Yelp don’t give af.

You will learn that by Federal law pipes always burst at 5:00PM on a Friday, thus requiring you to seek out and pay for a plumber after hours. If you hire someone to do filing they will silently change your system, then quit when you bring it up to them no matter how nicely.
Pretty good argument but it has one fatal flaw. People can memorize the Declaration of Independence too. Or Harry Potter. If people mostly recite HP from memory but apply enough creative changes, it's not copyright infringement.

So proving a system can memorize and recite proves nothing.
you may be right. i’m not sure i would recommend someone to pursue a brittle setup, but it might be more educational.
Damn it's actually pretty difficult but it was fun nonetheless
well, cover bands have to abide by copyright.
When are we going to take real action against this? When will execs and investors be held accountable?

I have no doubt that every tech company is secretly and illegally surveilling. If data is the name of today’s game, then tech co’s have every incentive to do so and to lie about it, particularly if there is essentially no punishment for doing so.

Everyone knows Instagram is listening. I don’t care what they say. The alternative is a mass scale hallucination that is highly improbable.
> that most people aren't getting enough fat from a modern Western diet.

yes, my observations are very opposite: fats are popular filling in western diet, you can check contents of muffins, croissant, sausages, not even talking about deep fried food, you will see more than half caloric intake is from fat.
In that case, wouldn't they whitelist 3rd party client apps then? At least on a case by case basis, and at least the biggest ones Apollo and co
I think this works for discharge, possibly with some extra cleverness needed if the batteries are at different SoCs. But I’m not sure how it could handle being tied to the grid intelligently or how charging could be managed without some additional controls.

Also, can a pure frequency-based scheme handle the case where a whole bunch of inverters are in parallel and a load that’s much larger than any one of them can handle individually starts up?
No, it's not. It's quite easy to learn this stuff, about as easy as making shit up on a message forum, so there's no reason not to go learn what you're talking about.
Indeed, I have read my notes from younger self. Absolute dog pile.

Like was thinking about a fully virtual avatar, not a person. But the tech wasn't there, and still ain't, to generate decent conversation, virtually rendered body with humanistic movements and facial expressions. Not to mention being able to select an interest field, Ie likes tech, hence tech conversations.

Back then I thought it was a brilliant idea. Now, it's quite impossible and better left sometime in the next 10ish years.
Production MAYBE, I'm not sure what makes you think bitcoin would have ramped up the development of GPUs. What part of the last 10 years of GPU development looks bitcoin-focused to you? They're still very very focused on rendering and machine learning, not computing hashes.
I scanned it, in that case the title is misleading and contradicts the article.
What an utterly absurd statement to make. It is embarrassing honestly and not worth more of a response.
The idea this is regulatory capture seems correct.

1. For all the talk of dangers, there has not been one definitive, well-thought out, peer-reviewed discussions of an A-to-Z way in which this might arise from current technology. Global warming isn't taken terribly seriously from a regulatory standpoint, and it has a defined model. One must naturally ask: how serious do they consider this if they can't show their work? How serious should we consider this "threat" they can't actually explain?

2. Therefore, we must presume it is speculatory.

3. These people are smart, well-funded, and have business interests.

4. At the fork dictated by Hanlon's Razor we are given two possibilities:

A. These highly intelligent people are forming a massive collective and putting their reputations on the line over ungrounded speculation. This implies they don't actually grasp the field they are discussing - even if they work in it, and therefore have made it clear they're not the type anyone should listen too. Therefore we should work to actively disregard them, and their institutions.

B. These highly intelligent people are organizing in a coherent manner to their net benefit. Likely through market capture. Therefore they are still respectable in their fields, but behaving by putting their interests before the public's.

Therefore: it might be contrary to Hanlon's Razor, but I think option B is more sound given the probability of mass hysteria seems so low among this particular population. Generally most here have recognized this some way or another, but I wanted to point out how clearly logical it is that this is clearly grift. In science your reputation has no value if you cannot prove your work, and they've fired off hypothesis without providing proof. That implies this list should be seen as a denouncement of the scientific credibility of everyone on it, which is a shame.
Geoffrey Hinton says [1] part of the issue with current AI is that it's trained from inconsistent data and inconsistent beliefs. He thinks to break through this barrier they're going to have to be trained so they say, if I have this ideology then this is true, and if I have that ideology then that is true, then once they're trained like that, then within an ideology they'll be able to get logical consistency.

[1] at the 31:30 mark: https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/05/03/1072589/video-ge...
Yes though professionals agree to a medical code of ethics, whereas you probably didn’t.

See discussions of the Goldwater rule [1] in psychiatry for more in depth explanations because it’s hard to explain without going into the very dark history of medical research and treatment.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule
It isn't just mods, it's a community in general. If no one else is posting and commenting, no one wants to visit.
>mostly Facebook anger bait

I chuckle sometimes to recall the popularity of the “forwardsfromgrandma” subreddit many years back, because the top of /r/all often looks almost exactly like it now.
rust docs is one of the reasons it's the so nice to use. Javadocs are nice but so many libraries have their own format. Everyone using the same thing makes it so much better
"AI Native" catching on
Now I’m curious what your bot does!
my current brittle setup is postmarketos on oneplus 6t. definitely kind of works. the rest of my setups are non-brittle.
I still don't really understand what nbdev is, I understand the idea of using Jupyter Notebooks to run code, but what does nbdev itself actually do?
Perovskite Solar Cells Push Bounds of Efficiency
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shader#Vertex_shaders

Tldr originally programmatic functions loaded in the pixel shading hardware pipeline
> So much trust involved in a possibly nuclear-level scenario, and you're not curious at all how that trust was built up? Such as by sharing intelligence?

Because they don't spy on each other and they share intelligence gathered elsewhere, as the agreement says. Why would you jump to the conclusion that this quote means they help each other break their respective countries' laws despite complete lack of evidence?
I do the same thing, but my move is to never go back to them. Works great. Saves time. Or something. :)
I wouldn't install Adobe Acrobat even if it gave me access to break the laws of spacetime.
"Minimizing deaths" is probably too simplistic, but not by much. If we can be reasonably confident that replacing human drivers will lead to 30% less traffic deaths, I think it would take some pretty large extenuating circumstances for me to not want that to happen.

> Also the state will have to grant legal immunity to car manufacturers so that they couldn't be sued to bankruptcy. That shouldn't provide them too many incentives to make their cars safer..

Indeed we would need to be careful not to make the wrong incentives.
> while Reddit users get less than nothing

those poor bastards, all chained to their computers, joylessly creating content for their overlords.
Before you could do fancy things with them like generative AI, run physics simulations, or mine cryptocurrencies, or even real-time ray-tracing, graphics cards were meant for, well, rasterised graphics.

Even before the programmable pipeline of today, graphics pipelines were fixed-function: see OpenGL before v2.0, or DirectX before v9. And there were (are) algorithms to colour fragments after/before rasterisation, called shading algorithms, like Phong shading, Blinn-Phong shading, Gouraud shading, etc.

So, the name stuck, even though now a shader can do a lot more than just set `gl_FragColor = vec4(1, 0, 0, 0)`.
Repeating this "Instagram is listening" conspiracy theory does a disservice to many legitimate privacy issues.
Fine-tuning is a much better proposition than you’re giving it credit for. Papers are coming out demonstrating that 7B parameter models can outperform GPT-4’s quality when trained on a limited set of tasks. Yet, a 7B model offers comparatively cheap and fast inference. Furthermore, for a lot of use cases, few-shot prompting is infeasible because you need to supply 2-3k tokens worth of few-shot examples with every prompt in order to fully specify the behavior you want. (As an example, think of long-form summarization where you want the summary to adhere to certain rules.)
Yes, you should build more housing. But if you're retired, you have to deal with the situation you have now.

> Millions of people are born in HCOL areas and make their lives there. We shouldn't ask them to leave.

then they should make more money
How does this make sense? Memorizing and then reciting copyrighted works is still infringement in a lot of commercial contexts.
The dollar's value is high.

https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/will-us-dollar-be-dethron...
Like I said, you can stop visiting the sites you don’t like the business practice of, you can accept that you like some content more than you dislike the business practice of the site, or you can convince yourself you’re right.

It’s not complicated.

Good luck changing public policy.
Because originally they were used to compute shading (in real time) for the scene being rendered. Shading, calculated per pixel, being a very computation-intensive operation.

But turns out you can do so much more with them than computing shading. The name just stuck.
"...many of my friends..." so I can't possibly be part of the problem and events created to support them are superfluous. Right?
> "Then perhaps characterizing doing work - including often doing partial replication, independently deriving results, checking code to make sure it's both complete and consistent, etc. as "ruining your career and your advisor will also be made" is unfair."

You are mischaracterizing my argument in multiple ways. What I said was "Peer reviewers never replicate the work. If you are a grad student tapped for peer review and you spend the time to replicate the work, you are ruining your career and your advisor will also be mad." which I stand by. I don't think it's unfair. Maybe your reinterpretation is unfair, but I can't speak to that because you were the one who wrote it not me.

Then in response to you saying "I have had reviewers and editors dig throughly into work, including code, and it has never been met with anything other than appreciation." I said "Yes obviously that kind of free and unexpectedly diligent labor would be appreciated." which I also stand by.

In response to you saying "I've sent reviews in detailing what further test or figure might be needed to make a point more persuasive, or noting inconsistencies, and I encourage my students to do the same." I said "Yes these are the kinds of things peer reviewers do. Notably not replicating the work." which I also stand by. You are saying that "Some of this is replication." Well it's obviously not. Asking for further tests and figures and noticing inconsistencies are exactly the kind of things that peer reviewers usually do, and it's not replicating the work.
There are some high-end restaurants that serve rare or even sashimi pork, and personally I'd eat it there because I assume they'd rather not get shut down. At home though I'd want it to at least spend some time in the pan.
Why don't you counter knowledge with knowledge instead of profanity then? We're all waiting.
That's four so far, counting the PineTab-V.

It's a nice chip, but would have been SO MUCH better if it has been available to board-makers in September 2021, as originally planned for the BeagleV "Starlight", not in January 2023.

In 2021 it was clearly a much faster alternative to the Allwinner D1 with a single 1.0 GHz core, which had started arriving in customer hands in late June. The D1's C906 core had a vector unit, but that was the only real advantage.

Now in the first half of 2023 the Pi 3-class JH7110 is running up against the Pi 4-class TH1520.

The VisionFive 2 and Star64 started arriving in the hands of customers in February and April, while the considerably faster (higher MHz and OoO, plus vector units) TH1520-based LicheePi4A started arriving in May. There will no doubt be other TH1520 boards soon too.

So far the 8 GB JH7110 boards are roughly $40 cheaper than an equivalently outfitted 8 GB TH1520 board. Perhaps the effective difference is more than that as as VisionFive 2 and Star64 have M.2 or PCIe while the LP4A doesn't.

So maybe there is a place for both. Let's see what price the Mars will be.
Ah yes, the site that refers to its users as "Daily Active Shitheads," and promotes vigilante armchair detectives to ignore the FBI and accuse random innocent civilians of being world class terrorists.
It's one of those "say a keyword with a question, get a response" type bots. I added in a few other "prompt sources" though, where it grabs the first part of an RSS entry or HN comment and tries to autocomplete the rest. Mostly just a boring testbed for me to play with models, for free, with friends.
Heh Heh Heh

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a_gW1KvuFk
These aren’t people. Just because we can find commonalities in learning and memorization does not mean we can ignore everything else that differs.