skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I can guarantee that not Qualcomm, neither Apple, will ditch ARM any time soon.

It’s any company’s duty to explore alternatives. Intel used to make ARM CPUs, Mediatek makes MIPS chips, etc.

It does not mean that it is possible to completely reverse course in less than a decade.

Qualcomm is definitely not going to dramatically reverse its core business direction to go full RISC-V in less than a decade. It makes no sense, especially after dumping $1.5B in Nuvia.

ARM’s case against Qualcomm is a licensing one. So you suggest that Qualcomm may be ditching ARM because of an argument about licensing ARM, which would make no sense whatsoever. It would be akin to Intel ditching AMD64 and adopting some exotic architecture, because of a disagreement about cross-licensing.

Apple just switched to ARM, of which they have a perpetual license. They are also getting into display production and modem design. Their aim is to control the production line to the last bit, they do not need to be compatible with anything else, so why would they ditch ARM any time soon? It would make no financial sense.

> As per RISC-V's foundation presentation in RISC-V Summit December 2022, RISC-V had at that point already shipped 10 billion cores.

There were 7 billion ARM cores shipped in the last quarter of 2020 alone, many of them inside actual consumer products, not SBCs or niche platforms. Virtually all portable, IoT, and in-car devices run on ARM. ~14% of laptops run ARM and the share is growing, same goes for datacenters. And most importantly, software support for RISC-V is still in its infancy, with no large scale consumer products currently available.

This is to say that RISC-V has a very long road ahead, and it is not going to topple ARM dominance any time soon, simply because the economics of it make no sense.
Thanks, I’ll try it! (I’m in Hungary)
I suppose that is my feeling too -- is there historical precedence for something like this in other languages anyone can reference?
Twitter Community Notes:

* WASIX does not allow one to open a random file in the host environment, in fact WASIX changed absolutely nothing in file system ABI's at all from preview1 - it just added other extensions.

* WASIX has not removed the capabilities model and instead extended it to support Berkley sockets - i.e. there are capabilities defined for the new socket operations.

* WASIX is fully sandboxed, meaning the network is completely virtual and can be restricted as much as one likes

* TTY and forking is also fully sandboxed.

* You can't reject the Internet
The biggest issue with modern activism is that it acts like peaceful vocal protest is the end of the line when really it's in the middle of a wide spectrum of options. If the people making the decisions don't care about you there is no construct of words that will have any effect on their behavior. If a sociopath is beating his wife or robbing his neighbor, debate club persuasion is not the tool for the job.
I’ll be more pedantic than that! Await is more akin to yield, the fact that it’s specific to promise resolution is a specialization of the more general function body suspension used by generators, with an extra specialization for event loop scheduling. And async just means you’re returning a promise no matter how your function exits.
More than a year ago, I had posted an "Ask HN: Where is JMAP (jmap.io) implemented or being implemented?" [1] but it didn't get any engagement. The situation doesn't seem to have changed much in the meantime. Fastmail (the main developer) seems to be the only one deploying it on a large scale.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30088483
Authoritarianism isn't a political system but is a technique of control. Every government is 'for the people' - until they're not
Protests are like backburning/hazard reduction burns of forests. Banning them to prevent minor disorder tends to lead to major disorder further ahead.

Democracy by its nature poorly represents minorities and protest is an important backchannel of information that some group isn't being appropriately represented, a reminder that society only functions with almost universal participation of the minorities as well.
Fabric does not use Databricks, but both Databricks and Fabric rely heavily on Delta. Let's just hope that they remain compatible.
Smiling is also important. Most animals I encounter seem to understand a broad smile as friendly and non-adversarial, especially cats and dogs.
"Oh, you _also_ need to print something? Lets stack a few monad transformers..."

"But remember that you need the TemplateExplicative and NullUnderstanding compiler extensions!"
(Not to contradict you in any way.) TeX, originally written in the SAIL language, was rewritten in Pascal around 1982. Was the CS and AI departments merged at that time?
Another happy user of Purelymail here. The GUI is unpolished, but deliverability and reliability have been excellent for me in the few years that I've used it. Unlimited custom domains and inexpensive.

It's not suitable for bulk sending, but for transactional and personal email, I've found it meets my needs.

Be warned, however, that it appears to be a one-man band, and if he goes under a bus...

I'm also a happy user of Migadu. More polished GUI and more features. I've never hit their limits, so not sure how suitable it would be for a medium-sized enterprise. As with Purelymail, it's not intended to be used as a bulk sending service.
About a year ago I went in for a regular checkup after my wife reminded me I had not had one. I thought, I’m 25 don’t really need one. Turns out my blood cell count was slightly elevated. 2 months later I do another test, it’s off the charts. Turns out I randomly developed leukemia. 11 months of chemo later, and I’m in remission. Not sure what would have happened if we had not caught it so early.
This is the same company that would really prefer for third-party batteries to not exist so people have to stay on the upgrade treadmill and not keep using the same camera body for a decade https://old.reddit.com/r/Nikon/comments/13ska1n/psa_thirdpar...
To me personally, Jira was the best tool I've used so far (used a few of them, but not very many).

But I still was not too happy with it back when I used it - main reasons being extremely slow load times (we had the cloud version, not self-hosted) - and lots of annoying inconsistencies, like "create issue" using a completely different editor than "edit issue", etc.
All those HM chairs…
Ever better weather forecast for one. I can remember that, about two decades ago, weather forecast was still rather wobbly, and could only see a couple days into the future. Now 10-day forecast is routine, and surprisingly good. Much of that improvement came about as a result of more powerful supercomputers.
Round-Sync: Rclone for Android with task scheduler
If this is serious, why?
> I think much of the world yearns for a leader who will stand up for them.

That has not been my impression. Rather, the opposite. All over the western world, more and more authoritarian parties get more and more votes.
Thanks for the news on DYMO, I missed it and I wanted to buy their printer...
Authenticity of dns records. Making sure that the dns record points to the correct ip address.

Whether or not an ip address goes to the correct computer is totally unrelated to DNS, so i'm not sure why anyone would think that has anything to do with a dns security measure.

The relavant security thing for bgp is called rpki.
Yeah but if you could reset the head instead of having to change it, imagine the savings
I'm involved in the Ferrocene project (1), so I'd like to clarify some things about the Ferrocene Language Specification. It is deliberately called Ferrocene Language Specification and not Rust Language Specification. The specification serves first and foremost the needs of the Ferrocene project - we just need a spec to certify the compiler. It may be useful to others, that's why we open sourced it.

It is not a specification that standardizes rust or prescribes any behavior to the compiler. It's a specification that describes certain aspects of the behavior of the existing rust compiler. It's neither comprehensive nor is intended to be. It follows the changes in the compiler. If there's a mismatch between compiler behavior or the spec, the spec is considered faulty. It is also not sufficient to write a new compiler based on the spec.

As such, Ferrocene is not an effort to standardize rust. We consider the Ferrocene project a certified downstream of the rust project. Any push to standardize rust would need to come from the rust project itself. We have not intention to create any such standard.

That said, there is some interest in building a specification for the rust language in the project itself - here's the relevant RFC https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3355

(1) I am one of the managing directors of Ferrous
Random idea, untested. Maybe it remembers client side? Then using two different browsers (or users in the same browser) could separate them.
The greatest artificial minds of our generation are thinking about how to make us click on ads?
Traditional way of expressing it is "following the spirit of the law vs the letter of the law".
But in case of U.S. Constitution opinions are always divided, which of these interpretation is the right one.
No thanks! I have better things to do than feeding that advertising behemoth. What I like about ChatGPT is that I don't see any ads at all!
Uh, "none", because the ratified version of RVA22 was published on April 2, 2023, less than two months ago?

We'll probably see the first boards with SoCs supporting RVA22 in the first half of 2024.
How come there is not something like a dating app to make friends?
> At least here in Germany these protestors are the whiniest people when it comes to dealing with others while crying the loudest about anything and everything.

Yeah, I’ll have to disagree there. And the whiniest people goes to FDP members playing opposition party, in any case.
Just a reminder that those same companies store that same information on things like Google Drive and OneDrive.

That means any and all of that information is already in the hands of the US government.
Australia fines employers for exploiting foreign IT workers
It was a great ride while it lasted. My assumption is that efficacy at coding tasks is such a small percent of users, they’ve just sacrificed it on the altar of efficiency and/or scale. That, or they’ve cut some back room deal with Microsoft to make Copilot have access to the only version of the model that can actually code.
This is crazy interesting but I didn't quite understand, when the timer runs out the head doesn't work anymore or you just get an LED notification to get a new one, to me at least there's a big difference in the two!
Harvard dropout starts a company and raises 20 million dollars. I bet you heard this story so many times and you might feel intimidated by them. But what makes students from Ivy League universities so spectacular?
Anything you have to say, mostly.
They could play whackamole cancelling abusive accounts, but that would require keeping logs to enable such activity.

Which mullvad specifically want to avoid doing - their whole jam is not having logs.
Another comment gave a concrete example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36134415
It's just "Mexican hat" potential. The `hot` was a phone keyboard typo and writing `top` was just a mental typo.
Ultra low contrast top header is hard to read. Red buttons mean stop. Ultra flat generic look. Invest in a few hours with a designer.

No pricing or byo API key
option makes me more hesitant to commit. Intro video length unclear as YT controls disabled on embed, and can’t adjust playback speed. Differentiation from every other chat-with-your-docs option out there is unclear.

But congratulations on shipping a launch. I’m sure you can improve in tight iterations.
Try GitLab with all project features disabled except the issue tracker. It works quite well & simple Kanban workflows are super easy to setup.

Edit: in the spirit of the thread, also try Plane.
I got a bill from a lab last year that was for about $1200, and when insurance denied it as out-of-network (it wasn't, the lab and the insurance company had some billing procedure issues) it was less than $100 somehow.

Out of stubbornness, I fought with the lab for months to bill it correctly, and eventually got them to write it off by emailing the CEO.
I own a Sonicare. All it does is vibrate and blink shortly after you are done brushing when it's time to "refill"

It doesn't even do that after every time you used the head "too much". Not sure how much it reminds you.
That reminds me of a story about SiCortex.

My university (University of Colorado Boulder) bought one of a very few SiCortex systems ever sold. As an undergraduate I competed at SC07 and SC08 in the Cluster Challenge competition.

Our coach was a CU facility member, Doug, who also was responsible for the SiCortex box we bought. At SC08 he told us that another one of the teams was competing with a SiCortex box. We knew that they would win the LINPACK part of the challenge, but we didn't know that LINPACK was basically the only thing they managed to get working.

We had also heard rumors that SiCortex was in trouble financially at that time. When we were walking the show floor at SC08, we came across the huge SiCortex booth, which had 10 or so machines of different sizes (I believe the smallest was a 64-core workstation and the largest was a ~5000 whole rack system).

I remarked to Doug that SiCortex didn't look to be in such bad shape.

Doug turned to me and said, "25% of the machines SiCortex has ever made are in that booth".

The SiCortex idea was like VLIW. On paper the numbers look great. On highly optimized synthetic benchmarks it looks good. On real world code you find out how hard it is to get good performance.
Typically less than half a percent, often lower.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.01433 does claim "1.2x-1.7x faster and uses 1.3x-1.9x less power than the NVIDIA A100".
They are comparing themselves with lies that their peers and the strangers/advertisers they consider to be their peers promote on social media, and it's not limited to body image.
What is stopping her? And isn't that a punishment as well so if we had none, she could? If she found enough people to invest...
Steve Coast’s proposal for OSMF strategic plan
If they have password and 2FA on the same device, then it's not 2FA. Tell them to get an external TOTP generator, at least.
Depends where, Quebec is closer to the US while English Canada is more like the UK.

Comparison here for the curious. [1]

[1] https://kellywarnerlaw.com/chart-differences-between-united-...
> I'd be giving up custom workflows

That’s the value prop
> there used to be a whole section on adding "sending identities"

This still exists, by the way. They moved it to Settings => Migration => Import => Add alumni email forwarding address or non-SMTP sending identity, which makes absolutely no sense to me.
the fourth one will refer you to their sponsors
Just sign up at my company. Job done!

My company used to title me: "System Architect". Yes, always singular, they're Germans and have no feel at all for English language.

Then HR bought a pricy scheme from some consultant, and now I'm suddenly an "Advanced System Engineer". And also mightily pissed off for not being a senior title.

It's like they roll dice around here. People went from being Data Analysts to being developers and vice versa. People were assigned titles that don't fit, purely so they could be outfited with certain benefits exclusively tied to those titles in a rigid scheme.

Leave it to HR to screw over any industry naming conventions and to make my future job applications great fun, when I will explain why I'm not really that thing that's actually on my CV.
Start with the originals--Torah, Bible, Koran, Vedas, Buddhist Canons, Greco-Roman Mythologies, Avesta, Enûma Eliš--then work your way out toward commentaries, sects, cults, precursors, apocrypha, heresies, schisms, etc. The problem with any condensed "Grand Tour of Religion" is the inevitable editorial bias (i.e. adopting someone else's understanding instead of developing your own).
You're conflating product made by the company but intended for sale in a particular market...with goods being made not by the company. Either in factories that have nothing to do with Apple, or being made in factories contracted by Apple, but in ghost production lines in parallel to the official ones, or "after hours."

Rossman was knowingly buying and importing parts made in Apple-contracted factories that were being made "off the clock" (ie, Apple parts are made from say, 9-5 and then from 6-10, the factory makes more, without telling Apple, and sells them through their own channels.)

That's a contractual violation, which is a civil matter...but the factory was using the Apple logo on the labels of the batteries, which is a trademark violation, and that's where customs gets involved.

So...yes, actually.

Rossman has some valid points but he's also a slimy shyster. Everyone else in the repair and parts biz was buying batteries without Apple logos, Rossman knew that, and knew that he could charge more, or more easily sell, the apple-branded batteries.

Apple has not, to the best of my knowledge, harassed anyone importing or using third party parts that lack an apple logo.

It's hilarious that you're pissed about literally the whole point of a trademark.
I thought Bumble was providing something like that ... but I might be wrong.
I don't see a reason to do a survey at all if participation is voluntary.

Results will be off by 5% or more, simply because heavier people won't volunteer.

And if the airline is fine with the result being wrong by 5% or more, they might as well just taken the average weight of 5 people in the office.
Or bump the head into a tag reader and have Home Assistant do anything from ordering new heads to flashing your Hue lights after 2 min of brushing.
Dan Henry Arrows
When I was a kid glass reuse was the norm. Yes, you take the large soda bottles back to the supermarket. Everyone did it and it wasn't a big deal.
Naturally, people feed it shit in order to bend results for others for their gain. Everyone who was in crypto manipulations, now rushed in this field, and they are extremely smart and extremely ruthless people, and they have no legal limits being anonymous, and almost unlimited funding they made in crypto. It reduces results quality, and also invokes countermeasures on their side to limit damage, that further reduces quality. Same road as Google has taken, remember how it was an almost magic tool that could find an answer to any question, 15 years ago, before SEO became a thing that promised easy money to anyone smartass enough.
You're talking about pirated or counterfeit goods. But this ECJ decision is about perfectly legitimate goods, whose movement and trade the manufacturer wants to control even after they've sold them.
The concept of the Virtual DOM is a means to an end to achieve declarative UI. It being "fast" is a common myth that spread in React community. Fast compared to what?
Not fully on topic but man do I still love (and use) Teletext on a daily basis. There are many things we (designers) can learn from it. The more stuff you can display the more you have to resist the temptation to do so. Early tech radically forced you to find creative ways to get to the core of what you were trying to achieve. Now with the abundance of memory and visual capabilities, nobody is carefully making choices anymore. Turning every UI into an overkill experience.

It’s something I try to push for when crafting new designs for startups at our firm.
It's untenable to simply trust LLM API providers that the models they are serving through an API endpoint is the model they claim it is. They could easily switch the model with a cheaper one whenever they wanted, and since LLM outputs are non-deterministic (presuming a random seed), it would be impossible to prove this.

LLM's integrated into any real product requires a model hash, otherwise the provider of the model has full control over any sort of deception.
To quote your "Louis has openly and proudly stated he has "no patience" for anyone with mental issues ...", I would say he has not only demonstrated a great amount of support for the GOS project, but also a fair amount of patience with Micay.

Building upon this, I will further quote your " I believe Rossmann grew fustrated with Micay at some point and then decided to bait him into a reaction so he could take him out of context to.. i dont know get back at him? Its not very clear to me exactly why he would do this."

How is it a bait when Rossmann privately tried to clear up the misunderstanding about GOS and Micay's situation with Micay in private, which did not pan out 8 months ago. He asked Micay to stop contacting him about his "Informative, but unfortunate comment" on Techlore's video, even offering a fresh start for Micay to give his perspective. Instead, the latter doubled down on accusations that Rossmann was supporting harassing campaign against him.
Please keep in mind that this was around 8 months ago.
Then Micay contacts him out of the blue in a few days ago, threatening to "ban him and expose him publicly", but this is somehow Rossmann baiting him ?

Maybe you could share with us some missing information that shows how Micay was baited ?

Tom Spark video is hardly fair, as it omits a lot of important information that better shows Rossmann's perspective, just like your comment seems to be doing.
His comment section in my opinion is a handcrafted echo chamber that supports Micay, as I left a few comments that addresses the weak point in Tom's analysis, but they have yet to appear in public. Meanwhile, comments that echo his perspetive, which were also left after my comment were left through, and one was even pinned.

In any case, have a nice day.
Unfortunately the link on the third post now seems to go to an SEO spam site, but the Web Archive seems to have the original - https://web.archive.org/web/20170303072943/http://richannel.... which was a blog post featuring this YouTube video - https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xe-f4gokRBs
AI 'SGE' is scarily sufficient but maybe not Google Search anymore
I suspect this is all a charade... Either the goal is to get mentioned in lots of newspapers (free advertising!), Or the goal is to persuade the regulator that they can squeeze a bit more cargo onto the plane.
Were the numbers accurate or hallucinated?
Not the GP, but I believe that they are talking about the size of the training data set in relation to the model size.
If I Were You by Jake and Amir was going for a decade I think but just finished. The questions are timeless though so you can easily go back and binge if you want
> ethics are meant to be the definer of how far to go (...)

No, the definition of "ethics" is "moral principles that govern a person's behaviour or the conducting of an activity."

If you feel compelled to resort to immoral behavior to win arguments, you already lost, and your contributions to society are a net negative.

Your argument is like stating that ethics in life are meant to be the definer of how far to go in that cause, with police departments being the ultimate decider if you've crossed the line. However, if you rob and murder random people without being caught by the police, you are undoubtedly an utter failure in life.
Bit meta, wanted to say this is one of the interesting posts on HN in a while. Good work on the author's part, following their curiosity, writing it up in an understandable way for the rest of us. They weren't successful in the end but still got far.
Man all this reminds me so much of my previous gig and it was so FUN.

Now I have a not so fun job at Big Tech doing SRE type work; all of that mucking around is abstracted away from me.
Depending on the model, it usually blinks an LED and vibrates a pattern to let you know it's time for replacement. It's definitely not a hard lockout or anything.

The brush heads for advanced models also tell the brush which cycle to use and which intensity to vibrate at (e.g., for tongue cleaning brushes vs normal brushes).