skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I have access to OpenAI's GPT4, and there appears to be no significant difference from GPT3 (or GPT3.5). It looks like we are pretty far into the curve of diminishing returns already.
Your definition of misogyny is far too narrow then, if you're focusing entirely on the concept of individual agency, yet ignoring the larger structural inequalities and power dynamics that constrain women's choices and perpetuate exploitation.

Did you actually read the article I linked, or are you just complaining about the URL? If you did read it, do you dispute the factual content that describes several examples of exploitation of women in the surrogacy industry?

Complaining that a woman has a strong opinion is a rather odd criticism, Julie Bindel has been actively researching surrogacy and its harms for many, many years now and it would be very surprising if she wasn't opinionated on this topic.

Just because there are some regulations in place doesn't mean that exploitation doesn't occur. The fact remains that surrogacy often involves financial transactions where women's bodies are being used as a means to an end. It is not at all misogynistic to critically examine this.
Guido was pissed over people being pissed over some syntax change a while ago, right?

The Python community seems way more loose and hacky where as Rust's treat decisions like they risks derailing trains and anyone disagreeing want to derail trains and kill people.
Pretty sure they’re just using poetic license.

Also, this is definitely not true—-a spouse cheating on you would be a “betrayal” but I wouldn’t fault anyone for weeping over it.
They’re not suggesting you don’t store it… I don’t think you’re addressing the real concerns here.

How I read the concerns: External connections to your data belong in a field or a separate table to ensure that your data is not so tightly coupled to the key you’ve chosen that you limit your data model’s expressive power. Don’t make an external identifier the primary key in your database.
> blatant Russian-owned US “assets” like Tulsi Gabbard

Why because she’s anti-war? What’s your proof of this, can’t wait to hear it.
Show HN: Tzap – Simple contextual code generation
One of the notable limitations of GPT when generating code is its generic answers; to remedy this we've built Tzap. We index your entire repository using embeddings which enables GPT to give contextual code suggestions. Just ask it a very specific question, and it'll generate a solution that fits your codebase seamlessly.

For instance, you can ask Tzap, "How do I implement a new endpoint that enables customers to pay and add a Stripe subscription?". Regardless of your backend setup—be it GraphQL, Express, or Java Spring — Tzap will search your existing code and endpoints and propose a contextualised Stripe subscription solution.

Or, you might be looking to refactor some dependencies; just query Tzap with "In 'file_name.a' I have 'function x' that is depended on by 'file_name.b' and 'file_name.c', refactor away this dependency", and watch it do the magic.

Tzap functions:
* tzap prompt: Indexes your entire repository
* tzap commit: Applies semantic Git commit messages based on a Git diff
* tzap search: Search in natural language and find things like where you defined or used a particular variable or function, e.g., "Where did I define 'User'?" or "Where did I use 'User'?".

We'd love to hear about how you're using GPT and if we can help you out!
I suspect that's why OpenAI recently added the share conversation thing, people are just looking at 3.5 and scoffing at it as it fails at things 4 would do just fine, and then assume it applies to all models. They've got a marketing problem that can't really be solved without making 4 public or showing people volumes of examples of what it can do. I was pretty convinced by the launch demo, seeing it not make the same mistakes I've seen 3.5 do when using it, but basically nobody's seen that one.
> Everything is done openly on https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs

But the RFCs are written and reviewed by people. And they need to have the feeling that the work they do isn't useless because the one who actually decides is somebody else who hasn't been involved in the process at all until the very end. It's ok having somebody being able to veto stuff, but this must be known and communicated beforehand - "yes, that's ok for us, but $PERSON has the last word on this so we have to await his approval".
The Direct Primary Care model shows that the overheads for healthcare are definitely a very large contributing factor to high costs and poor patient experiences. Cutting out the insurance company and related overheads from the medical practice, lab tests, and pharmacy creates an incredible experience for the patient at a very reasonable cost. I was and continue to be baffled at the attention I receive under a DPC physician, as well as how low the associated non-subscription costs are (effectively zero with the elimination of urgent care and expensive tests). The doctors and staff at the DPC practice are all happy and stress-free. Our system is definitely broken.
Only to say

> I haven't even considered this angle until this [other] person's tweet.
First off, I want to point out that browser-based services and applications can be made secure; we should keep this one clear, especially for readers here, because otherwise it would invalidate most if not all services that exist accessible via browser. Take AWS which houses infrastructure for so many organizations; we access it via browser and this is totally fine.

The assumption you highlight is specifically "if a browser-based service gets hacked." Well yes, if any browser-based service, like AWS, got hacked then it'd be all game over. However, given that appropriate security measures are implemented/taken, we can in fact design web applications that are securely accessible via browser; this is the basis for how we access applications on the web securely, those that are not end-to-end encrypted (E2EE).

What I'm trying to say is that your assumption is based on a particular case that is "if a browser-based service gets hacked." I think, however, if this assumption occurred to many other non-E2EE services we use on a daily basis, we'd have a huge problem as well. Now, the reverse assumption that is the browser-based service is not hacked, coupled with an E2EE architecture, I believe it's possible to design a secure system here where even the server cannot read the values of secrets which is a point of E2EE.
Here's what it looked like before the announcement: http://web.archive.org/web/20230302172255/http://txti.es/

Input markdown, get a web page.
It hurts the language. People who could help improve and advocate for the language think twice before getting involved.
People want to feel good about their language of choice, see this use something else.
So you would rank the flexibility aspect higher, I see. My past experience shows me that the "we need to get the architecture right here“ will often be down-prioritized, as these efforts are not visible to the end-user. That’s something I fear might happen again, because no one with their right mind will say "No." to a customer, waving with a pile of money, that needs feature "XYZ" to close the deal.

While the decision itself is not mine to make, I‘m involved in the finding process. And I'm currently leaning towards the "let’s do as much as feasible up-front" group.
She grew up very poor. I suspect many wealthy people didn’t. Also, she made her money working for a living, not through financial BS.
Most Popular AI Websites (Sorted by Monthly Traffic from High to Low)
Real patriots wouldn't flee the country.
Thank you all for the suggestions and the incredibly generous advice as always. Yes, it's GlasgowGPT, and yes it's pretty offensive (https://glasgowgpt.davidhewitson.co.uk)

I've decided to go with a big old banner ad for now as I think there are some local businesses who might go for it. Whatever happens, it's been a fun 2 week ride! Awrabest
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusion_of_control

It's a cognitive bias in all of us, including the lawmakers approving the use of self driving cars.
People need to know about, and read, Donald Gause and Gerald Weinberg's Exploring Requirements: Quality Before Design[1].

If you don't know who Gerry Weinberg is, then look that up too. You will profit from the exercise.

1. https://geraldmweinberg.com/Site/Exploring_Requirements.html
People are literally calling it out. Nobody's obsessing.

It seems to me that OP feels like he is forced out by this behavior. To be forced out of a project you put your heart and soul into over several years, that can hurt.

Also the governance of the project is important if you want to invest in the ecosystem. These are the people who make the decisions for Rust. If you want to rely on Rust, you better trust them to make the right ones, and this here is (ostensibly) a strong example to the contrary.
Must be specific your region. Not my experience around Atlanta.

Around here common illness kids can come back after 24 hours of symptom free (daycares dont ask how they became symptom free). Super contagious like pinkeye requires doctors note that it's not pink eye, or put on a treatment plan.
Holy crap. How do I shield myself from this political bullshit and keep simply coding?
Is there anything more pathetic than the internecine fighting of a bunch of nerds? The level of emotional maturity and “life experience” on display is of a 15 year old level, at best. The fact that this is still going for many days after the fact proves my point. The histrionics over a very minor slight is over the top. Just quit it.
In regard to the A55 and the A510, can anyone explain the design goals of these? Do they refine the A53 as a "small" CPU? Or are they larger more featureful CPUs?
it all just feels like a rebranded search engine. which we failed to effectively use the first time around. If AI could figure out how to process all the human bullshit busy-work we do, then I think we have a future, but for now let's just call it a really good bot.
The best country is a join over many things:

The one you and your family (if they're making financial sacrifices) can afford.

The one which will offer you pathways to citizenship and family migration in the future.

The safest one.

The one you have a support community in our nearby.

The one with good primary health care.

The one which recognises your existing tertiary education investment.

The one with a climate you can handle.

The one with food culture you can handle.

It's multivariate. You've got a lot of research to do and you didn't make enough of the input conditions clear.

Sometimes a stepping stone move is needed.

Sometimes you need to "try before you buy" with a student or young person working visa.
It's markdown-based static webpage hosting: http://txti.es/how
Just move to the best place in your country, learn coding and sell your services online. Move later - it is difficult and costly. You will need to write a lot more about yourself if you want people to interact. If you do a project and show people then you might get somewhere.
Oh that's interesting, thanks! Not a native speaker but I dimly remember hearing about this in english class, thanks for reminding.

I guess then the PhD student is indeed grammatically a singular then. It can still refer to a PhD student in general though instead of a particular one.

https://www.rit.edu/ntid/sea/processes/articles/grammatical/...
They didn't get into EVs because 1. Japan didn't like them (and still doesn't) because they have very expensive electricity 2. they were already getting into selling giant pickup trucks, not luxury sedans 3. China wasn't ready to compete yet.

They are limited by participating in the economy, but actually that's the strange thing about this superintelligence scenario - it never seems to include the economy. In other words, if you invented an AGI, it would have to get a job to pay for its AWS credits.
Ah. Thanks for the explanation. With that I agree completely.
> they own the consequences

No. We own the consequences.

> the most fair one.

The most fair, yes, probably. The fairest? No. Though I’ll admit I’m stumped (though in good company I suspect) as to how to possibly achieve the fairest outcome. I suspect it’s a platonic ideal, barring a Star Trek reality coming to life.
being on youtube is great, but if you have a chance to see stalker in a cinema or a better digitized higher resolution version, i highly recommend it. this movie has among the most beautiful film grain and colors i have seen and this dimension is mostly absent on the linked digitization. this is also probably the worst movie for this to happen as the pace and composition require a nearly meditative immersion into the scenes, like looking at a great oil painting without enough resolution to see the brush strokes.
This!

Preferably at least 50% women.
On an object level it's not a big deal, but you're not thinking about it with the correct framing.

Being invited as a keynote speaker lends you credibility and status. It means you have been acknowledged as someone worthy of giving a keynote. You may not care about this, but other people do.

To downgrade someone from a keynote speaker to regular speaker is extremely disrespectful. Especially someone that you invited.

It makes it seem like you are toying with this person, and based on JT's account someone on the Rust team was toying with JeanHeyd because they went behind the rest of the team's back to downgrade his talk.

It's like giving a child a toy then snatching it back. It's just cruel. Whether it was a mistake or not doesn't change that.
And I'm putting 90% of the blame for that onto the mainstream media, reporting irresponsibly and perhaps maliciously in order to milk a fear cycle out of AI. And some of it on OpenAI/Google execs, now cynically drumming up inexistent existential threats to facilitate regulatory capture.
In real life dogs can exist with more or less than 4 legs.
GPUs are plenty of capable running 24/7 without issues for a long time.

Plenty of cloud providers have consumer grade GPUs.

Cryptominers don't have an issue running it at 100% either.

They have heat issues and power efficiency issues not GPU Chips breaking.

The only instance I know are if you use a very particlar load type which would normally never happen like 24/7 hitting one register only or moving data only through the bus without anything else.

Those issues are rare.
> This design scheme was consistently among the best

What paper size do they/you assume? The only easy available here in my part of Europe is 21×29.7 cm (A4).
Wow... that's an interesting idea

Taking a system carefully designed to maximize power transmission across the country, and only sending power in bursts seems rather an odd design choice. You'd need to beef up all the transmission lines and transmission gear by a few orders of magnitude in current and/or voltage to make something like that possible. I'm not sure there's enough steel, aluminum, copper and insulators available to make that happen.

How would you store gigajoule "packets" of energy?
Ok, but then I'd like to see Bayes theorem being actually applied for different cases, instead of just hand-waving the issue away for all cases. Also, for some false positives there is no problem, e.g. vitamin D deficiency, where you can just take extra vitamins without much risk.
I don't see how destroying it will help.
The article explains why polar is better for some launches.
You're probably just jesting but... people live there.
They are the sorts of questions that make it such an interesting problem. Maybe it's not as simple as turning it on and off? Maybe there is something to be drawn from the world of adiabatic logic? Maybe the answer is some sort of resonant system or waveform which "sloshes" energy from place to place instead of a hard on/off (yeah, related to AC). Maybe there is a system to smartly manage the boundaries between packets, to avoid unnecessary switching?

I don't think we have the answers (yet), but I think there will be benefits if we can find the answers. For example, we could truly leave the current generator/consumer model behind: just like the web enabled everyone to become a publisher, everyone could become a generator in their own right. No doubt we will then be talking about the Goolalisation of the energy network, where a theoretically distributed system becomes dominated by a small number of monopolies and people talk about how it's not worth running your own generator since Powersoft refuses to accept energy packets from smaller generators.
A guess would be people using it for spam / scam landing pages.
Groupthink amongst techies. It's amazing how everyone takes Snowden at his word.
Literal traitor and they can't see that he has an agenda.
Seems like you played too much Bioshock :)
We are talking about a city that a quarter million people call home, not an amusement park that needs to adapt to changing conditions
Sure, but that has a simple solution not even mentioned in this post: isatty(1)
SoCs that have only A53 cores are terribly slow. Recently played with a Motorola Moto G22 phone with a Mediatek Helio G37. The phone has a nice design, 5 cameras, enough RAM and storage (4GB/64GB), but the UI is laggy and slow, installing and lunching apps, rendering web pages takes a lot of time.
Incredible how much contrarianism flourishes on HN just for the sake of it
It's all about control, folks. I despise that you consider yourself the "savior" here because you saved your family from AI driving. Nope, you'd rather cast doubt on something than embrace it because of insignificant human ego. It matters to you and your precious family, but does it matter in the grand scheme of things? Huh?
> I didn't realize they would use it against us just blatantly in direct violation of every law put in place to prevent it, though.

They didn't. You interpreted the Snowden revelations incorrectly. The government actually cares a LOT about civil liberties.
Dell XPS 17 9730 laptop review: GeForce RTX 4070 multimedia monster
Inmates Await Theranos Founder Elizabeth Holmes: ‘I Want to Be Her Friend’
>A lot of these kinds of public outcries are people of a minority group misunderstanding why some decision was made. Of course there is discrimination, but not as much as some people believe.

It's easy to miss the discrimination when you're not a member of the affected group.
Perhaps because they can see a doctor when they need one?
Perhaps not. That said, I was heavily upvoted.
I already am blessed in my country but the thing is the outlook for the future is not good e.g inflation rate is over 40 percent atm.
https://archive.is/slShT
Venice is a small city compared to Jakarta, and they're moving Jakarta. However I'm not sure if they will succeed in their plans with Jakarta, sure the big companies will move, but moving a city is not a trivial thing to do.
a coughing decade of work and history the owner previously volunteered to host is going to be tossed the cough away into the coughing bit bucket with no recourse once again
thank you so much for your kind and detailed feedback.
BDFL or atomic leadership-led groups are more streamlined and decisions tend to be less questioned, dissidents are erased out and egos crushed. It's easier because all the gravitas, and all the blame, is pinned to a monolith. "When he/she/it woke, the dinosaur was still there" would say Guatemalan writer Monterroso.

Participative leadership, otoh, is a pain. Every topic is a tug-of-war. Every decision has a significant party that disagrees and is unhappy with the outcome. Every ego flourishes. Even the serene will feel poised and entitled to raise endless issues. There's a general lack of perspective and very few people celebrating what has been accomplished. All milestones are muddied by buts and ifs and people feel like shit.

Yet in every disagreement lies opportunity. Multiplying successes is the heart and soul of teamwork. That's why participative groups are better because worse is better. I hope the Rust team doesn't lose perspective and keep, as before, working hard to drive such a great language, toolchain and open community forward.
Elon Musk-Backed Carbon Capture Technology Could Save the World
More lost than found myself here (like many others I suspect).

But heard through the grapevine back in 2010 or so. Joined and have lurked here everyday more or less since and always find something interesting. Kind of a homepage really.

Had I know I'd be here 13 years later I wouldn't have made such an ironic username lol.
That's not quite the issue I'm raising. It's not about being able to communicate better with existing robots - it's where (as yet) there are no robots suitable to do the job.

There are plenty of tasks which are simple, tedious and repetitive - and yet are resistant (currently) to automation. An example is sorting mixed plastic waste into categories according to the type of plastic. This is comparatively trivial for almost any human, and (afaik) not yet possible to automate. (Another is picking and packing things in Amazon's warehouse - which we know they've expended huge effort in trying to solve.)

Look at it the other way around: why are all simple, tedious, repetitive jobs not already automated? It's either because it's possible but not economically feasible, or no-one's tried yet... or because it's really difficult and so far there's no solution.

This last category represents a lot of 'low end' jobs. GPTs are unlikely to move the needle here, as appropriate robots to carry out the tasks don't exist yet.
Can someone explain to me the reasoning the original persons [1] blog post is flagged but not this one?

(I don't agree with flagging either)

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36091242
On the other hand, as a conference attendee, I expect that the keynote talks reflect which direction Rust is going.

If they know that the person's point of view is totally different than the most likely outcome, having this speaker as keynote speaker is not a good choice.

(With all that aside, they should have thought about it before inviting this person, and not after)
This reminds me of this article for which symbol fine tuning helps overcome: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03846

Basically they show that larger models have an easier time giving up their semantic priors, so that, in the context of OP paper, learning the mapping for len becomes print and print becomes len.
Coaching people into committing crimes, so they can meet their metrics and justify further spending.

https://theintercept.com/2015/03/16/howthefbicreatedaterrori...

>THE STING How the FBI Created a Terrorist

>Osmakac was the target of an elaborately orchestrated FBI sting that involved a paid informant, as well as FBI agents and support staff working on the setup for more than three months. The FBI provided all of the weapons seen in Osmakac’s martyrdom video. The bureau also gave Osmakac the car bomb he allegedly planned to detonate, and even money for a taxi so he could get to where the FBI needed him to go. Osmakac was a deeply disturbed young man, according to several of the psychiatrists and psychologists who examined him before trial. He became a “terrorist” only after the FBI provided the means, opportunity and final prodding necessary to make him one.

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-...

>But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. Suspects naïvely played their parts until they were arrested.

https://theintercept.com/2021/08/14/911-al-qaeda-fbi-liberty...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/dec/12/newburgh-four-...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/16/fbi-entrapment...

>Some experts agree. "The target, the motive, the ideology and the plot were all led by the FBI," said Karen Greenberg, a law professor at Fordham University in New York, who specialises in studying the new FBI tactics.
Only around 50,000 of them live in the old bit we think of us as Venice, and the number is dropping steadily. The rest live on the mainland (Mestre).