skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It certainly isn't prohibited but does cause issues if Name/DoB/City of Birth coincide. There are a few cases where speeding tickets and arrest warrants end up with the wrong Mr. Müller.
If you go into that thread there are people begging Selig to charge them 4x what Apollo Ultra costs. And they're begging him to charge it to everyone all the time.

This can't just be laid on the feet of faceless bean counters or old men in the executive suite.
It's entirely idiotic history.

We had our own e-mail, but we had some problems that were generally caused by management wanting @example1.com and @example2.com to be entirely equivalent, not just an alias, but still land on the same account.

which was fine for the email, as it can just have custom rules, but any related services like calendars bugged, as it saw different domains as different users. We tried to hack around it but it was still buggy in places.

Boss finally got pissed off and decided to migrate to O365, all while IT was screaming nooo. "Because our clients use it too, it will be easier to collaborate"

...and it turned out that what he wanted isn't possible in O365 *fucking anyway* so all e-mails are under @example1.com. And we replaced some weird quirks with many more quirks we can't even hope to fix. We waste more time dealing with this shit than we did on running our own mail servers. Which we didn't like, coz running mail servers sucks, but O365 sucks harder.
Yes, this post is nonsense. The biggest issue is that macOS doesn't do sub-pixel anti-aliasing and hasn't for many years: the "after" picture looks nothing at all like macOS!

You'd achieve macOS style rendering on Linux by:

* disabling hinting completely (don't forget the auto hinter)

* disable subpixel anti-aliasing (use only grayscale full pixel anti-aliasing)

Then you need to find a way to enable sub-pixel positioning (which uses anti-aliasing to offset glyphs by fractions of a pixel). If your applications are all QT5/6 or GTK4, you're done, because this is enabled by default. Applications that use other text drawing methods (including GTK2/3 but probably others) may need additional adjustment. I think the only sure-fire way of doing it would be to patch Pango / Cairo.

Personally, I do most of the above but leave sub-pixel anti-aliasing enabled, because it works better on my low-DPI monitor.

The advice given on the page is outright wrong for a few reasons:

* it doesn't mention sub-pixel anti-aliasing at all (and leaves it enabled!)

* the before picture appears to have less hinting than the after picture, and therefore more macOS like (??)

* it doesn't mention sub-pixel positioning at all
What do you mean by "build small private communities"?

Is it not the case that when you're hanging out with some people, someone asks "hey man what's your facebook/number/discord" and then you get added to the group chat on whatever platform?
> No. Making a single copy for your own use is still a copyright violation.

In some jurisdictions, perhaps, but not in all of them. There isn't one set of universal copyright law in the world. Eg in New Zealand you are allowed to make a single copy of any sound recording for your own personal use, per device that you will play the sound recording on. I'm sure there are other examples in other countries.

https://www.consumer.org.nz/articles/copyright-law
I've been wondering why this argument's not been sitting with me, and I think it's for the same reason that the courts have ruled that the FBI needed a warrant to put a tracker on someone's car, as opposed to following someone - the scale of action enabled is the differentiator.

A student learning from other artists is still limited in their output to human-scale - they must physically create the new thing. An AI model is not - the difference between a student learning from an artist and an AI model doing so is the AI model can flood the market with knockoffs at a magnitude the student cannot meet. Similarly, the AI model can simultaneously learn from and mimic the entirety of the art community, where the student has to focus and take time.

If this weren't capitalism - if artists weren't literally reliant on their art to eat, and if the market captured by the AI model didn't inevitably consolidate wealth - then we might be able to ignore that, but we do, and we can't ignore the economic effects when we consider scale like this.
This is not "what terminology I prefer"

It's what science is about and how it defines things!

Apparently some people are looking at the first sentence and assuming "Evolution Denier!" and this is not the case at all. This is simply an argument for good science and correct terminology when talking about scientific principals!

Gravity, and Evolution are theories. That is what they are. They are not facts (scientifically speaking). A fact is something else.

This has no relevance to evolution being best fit explanation for biological diversity (which, just to be clear, I agree with 100%) or gravity being best fit explanation for why things fall down at a consistent rate.
Having full support for the uriTemplates makes reverse mapping impossible, so I suspect adoption of the proposal in the API gateways will be close to 0
FWIW, there are a few companies cropping up now doing better codegen for client libraries. I'm starting one of them: https://stainlessapi.com

Unfortunately we don't yet have a "try now" button, and our codegen is still closed-source, but you can see some of the libraries we've generated for companies like Modern Treasury and sign up for the waitlist on our homepage.

Always happy to chat codegen over email etc.
This is what I understood as well. They want to either democratize adoption or not release it. The last thing they/anyone wants is for another BigCo or Govt to h take undue advantage of the model (through fine-tuning?) when others cannot.

That said, I can imagine a GPTQ/4-bit quantized model to be smaller and easier to run on somewhat commodity clusters?

Or it could run with GGML/llama.cpp on a cloud instance with a TB of RAM?

After seeing what people were able to do with LLaMA, I am positive that the community will find a way to run it - albeit with some loss in performance.

It would be truly amazing if they used their computing to develop quantized models as well.
> why would you want to sync to power network in the first place

It's very stable, because it was used/ok to use for time. Well, it was until very recently [1].

[1] https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/economy/2018/05/17/cloc...
Massive bids on paintings are a preposterous craze of privileged people with too much (ill-gotten) wealth.
> AGI smart enough to kill everyone to make paper clips while simultaneously stupid enough to not realize that no one will need paper clips if they are all dead

No one is making this argument. The argument is that the AGI doesn't care about us. Once it exists, its goals are more important than our lives. As a comparison, do humans ever care about the existence of an ant colony when they want to build something? Almost never. We recognize that the colony exists and has its own goals and has intrinsic value, but we assign it an extremely low value.
Your local ISP doesn't monitor torrenting, but copyright holders monitor torrent peer list and they send warning to ISP. If you use AWS as a front ISP, you'll get warning from AWS
Right, selling the drawing is what's illegal. Knowing how to draw it isn't. These models know how to draw things. Using your Pokemon ROM logic, ChatGPT should be banned because it knows how to make Pokemon-themed games.
I'm not happy until the people behind it are impoverished and imprisoned. The negative externalities of this shitshow are incalculable.
You have assume both that leap, and also that killing off the free version doesn't stagnate and eventually kill the paid one. Those existing paid users probably started as free users. The API is also not his only cost. For example, he doesn't actually get $5/month, but something like 70% of it...$3.50.
What website is this? Citation needed.
A nit, but the resolver, not the client, validates DNSSEC. The client/stub resolver trusts its local resolver. That always struck me as weird.
You'll notice the wording there is much more paired back.
Tim Hunkin uses a similar explanation in "The Secret Life of Machines" when talking about computers vs. human mind: that the real strength in the human mind is the ability to forget things!
> So let me see if I understand this thread.

You realise you've been arguing with multiple people expressing multiple opinions, right? You appear to be prone to binary thinking, so it might not be clear to you that your opponents don't form a single monolith.

> tl;dr if you're not offended by 4chan they're not actually saying anything offensive about you even though it might appear so superficially; 4chan just has a different list of things you can't say.

I'm not offended by the things 4chan users say because I don't visit 4chan. You should try it yourself. Getting so upset by words you disagree with on one forum that you feel the need to froth at the mouth about it on another forum doesn't seem healthy.
Not quite true: it's what is reported typically.

You have to explain why so many people err in the same way, if you want to claim those reports to be counter-factual.

He shows a video of one of those "round" (rather spherical) objects. While not going at Mach 2 in that instance, it's clearly real and air-borne.
Not showing the interact-able parts of the UI. Sometimes buttons will have a large colored area, but only the text at the center is clickable. More often the opposite, a chunk of text with no indication of where the clickable/tappable area begins and ends. Even worse is when there are multiple options in a row with no way to see the boundaries between, or if there is any dead space. Fitt's Law has been a thing since before these designers were born!

The worst example I encounter on a daily basis is Twitter. Each tweet has at least 8 sections that do different things when tapped. I never know quite where to long-press with my thumb over the tiny timestamp to open it in a new tab, or where the boundary is between the single line of text and the username.
But that ignores the whole point! If I ignore that the sky isn't blurple, sure, the sky is blurple.

The Nazis believed all Jewish people to be connected to a conspiracy, even though the necessary precondition wasn't given. This is NOT the same with Russian people, which the previous poster claimed.

I am not claiming all Russian people should be treated one way or another, but I cannot stand the historical revisionism comparing the plight of the Jewish people DURING WWII to Russian people today!
Drivers of Social Influence in the TwitterMigration to Mastodon
If it was the query planner than I suppose the protocol wouldn't have been the way to make it fail
Japanese copyright law article 30-4 states[1]:

> It is permissible to exploit a work, in ... cases ... it is not a person's purpose to personally enjoy or cause another person to enjoy ... provided, however, that this does not apply if the action would unreasonably prejudice the interests of the copyright owner ...

> i)if it is done for use in testing to develop or put into practical use technology ...

> (ii)if it is done for use in data analysis (meaning the extraction, comparison, classification, or other statistical analysis of the constituent ...

> (iii)if it is exploited in the course of computer data processing or otherwise exploited in a way that does not involve what is expressed in the work being perceived by the human senses (for works of computer programming, such exploitation excludes the execution of the work on a computer), beyond as set forth in the preceding two items.

Japanese legalese is a rather inefficient pseudo-european built on Japanese language, so I wouldn't recommend making decisions based on a blog article like this; there hasn't been too much news stories regarding this too as additional anecdotal datapoint.

1: https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/ja/laws/view/4207#j...
If the Earth warms significantly, we could have a situation where it triggers an ice age. (There are mechanisms for this to happen.) If the surface temperature of the water surface rises to a very high level, we could also have hypercanes.
I suppose playing the imitation game is fun, but we really need to stop calling just anything a Turing test. There's a large chasm between something that can trick a few people and something that people cannot distinguish from human despite their best efforts.

This is a bit like testing general relativity using a hand timed stopwatch and an elevator. Sure that is a valid though experiment but the test is nowhere near powerful enough to say anything useful.
It's truly depressing. Reddit's usefulness as an aggregator is what's kept me around for so long. But the sheer extremist views I see on a daily basis are so off-putting. My wife jokes about how I say every other month that "I'm going to quit Reddit".

It's so weird to me that they've let the mods go absolutely bonkers. I've gotten banned from so many subreddits simply for having a different opinion.
By “Clear technical arguments” you’re referring to tens of thousands of words of unreadable fan fiction
I love that this discussion is rapidly headed to sticking an XO on the circuit suppling current and frequency to control the old digital clock that lacks an XO. Hackery at its finest.
> - Many AI systems we have developed quickly become superhuman (Go, StarCraft, many aspects of ChatGPT and Midjourney).

This is a) cherrypicking (there are plenty of "AI systems" we have developed that have failed to become superhuman), and b) not accounting for massive differences in the types of "AI systems" being talked about in the different cases.

> - The AI capabilities progress is way faster than AI alignment progress, we have no idea how to control AI systems or make them want the same things we do.

We know perfectly well how to prevent an AI from doing things that can either harm us directly, or allow it to rewrite its own code. Just because we don't know how to make an LLM cite its sources doesn't mean we don't know how to sandbox our code.

"Control over AI systems" and "AI alignment" are not binary things.

Nowhere in your "evidence" have you presented anything that says AGI is even possible.

Nowhere in your "evidence" have you presented anything that says that, if AGI is possible, the very first time an AGI is created, it will seek to make itself superintelligent regardless of its creators' intentions, or that it will see itself as being in opposition to humanity in any way—that it will "want" anything beyond what it was created to want.

Nowhere in your "evidence" have you presented anything that says that, if AGI is possible, and wants to become superintelligent, and sees humans as being its enemies, it will have the capability to improve itself in those ways faster than we can detect it.

All of these missing links are science fiction scenarios. That's at least three (possibly four, depending on how you want to count them) potentially-impossible gaps that have to be crossed in order to get from where we are today to the nightmare scenario you posit.
>Your premise is based wholly on the belief that you know more about Reddit users than Reddit does. That seems dubious to me.

I know that their UI and native application are absolutely bullshit.
Child pornography stopped happening once the FBI got involved with the site.

It also never was a normal or common thing and the administration of the site never set themselves to let it happen in any manner afaik. To a large degree it was a product of a different time on the internet.
> Give it time and far-left will dominate as moderates silence themselves out of fear.

This is already happening across the board.
Moreover, a zero shot Eminem might have a vector encoding smaller than the data required to store a fingerprint or small image.

Can you own a few numbers that represent "you"? What if someone reaches those same numbers via vocal impression or simply manually dialing and tuning some knobs and levers?

This brings up the question as to what actually makes us unique.
Idle comment: the popular UFO/UAP discourse, has a major new strand predicated on the hypothesis that the phenomena are associated not with ETs in the "these are the ships they flew here in, or away craft from their mothership parked elsewhere in the solar system,"

but rather with some civilization whose presence in the solar system and indeed on earth predates our own,

which shades over in one subset, into a set of hypotheses about panspermia or humanity being engineered.

Some with these views parse official statements from a different direction than most, believing they discern carefully chosen language which plays to consensus ideas about what might be being investigated and what might be known.
Do you consider the Unity model "sleazy"? But I agree that it was poor form to call it open-source at the time. Sadly, it seems to be standard practice in the LLM space to release models with all kinds of restrictions on use and call them "open source".

Well now Falcon is open source. Given they are giving away something that was very expensive to train, I am grateful.
The sun is dangerous, but we're not pushing the Earth closer to it every year.
he wrote more about ai risk here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36042126
So I believe David Guetta of all people did this at a recent performance.

- https://finance.yahoo.com/news/dj-david-guetta-used-eminem-2...

- https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pNP1MqmzaZg&pp=ygUWZGF2aWQgZ3V...
Cool, that assumes those users will continue to use Reddit after the third party apps have been killed.

For me, I don’t think that will be the case. I almost exclusively use Reddit on mobile though Apollo and Reddit’s own app is absolutely garbage (unpleasant to use and heating up my phone burning through the battery).

I used to pay for Reddit premium, but I stopped after realising that Reddit wasn’t providing me a better experience for it.
Hmm, no testing of LLaMA or Falcon.

Subjectively, alignment of open source LLMs can vary wildly depending on the instruction finetune and the context prompt, and many finetuners go out of their way to remove alignment.
I wonder if the solution is to develop a forum with better UX? And also with a better way to find said communities through search engines (Quora for example does a good job of getting on Google)?

Though I would also argue that one of the biggest negatives about Reddit is that you can't come back to a thread later that day or another day, if you want to get your reply head then you need to respond immediately and attain a lot of upvotes. With a forum you could respond whenever you wanted and get a discussion going. And similarly forums would allow you to avoid the echochamber effect by avoiding upvotes/downvotes as everything was chronologically ordered, so it was a much more civil affair.

But I agree that the chain-of-quotes is a positive about Reddit, which I think might be possible to implement/merge into a new forum design.
I, and many others, have paid for the Pro version of Apollo. Would happily pay more to continue using it over the official app!
"State Farm General Insurance Company made this decision due to historic increases in construction costs outpacing inflation, rapidly growing catastrophe exposure, and a challenging reinsurance market."

https://newsroom.statefarm.com/state-farm-general-insurance-...

Seems like a solid reason to me.
Read the article waiting for some keen insight. Absolutely no coherent point made.
It would have then helped for SE corporate to expand a bit more on what constituted misdiagnosing ChatGPT content, how that was determined and how it was determined that certain countries were prone to false positives.

The disconnect between regular users capable of flagging (though the "what is an acceptable flag" has likewise gotten more and more restricted too - see also "not an answer" is not the right flag if there was any attempt to answer, even if it was the wrong answer to the wrong question), moderators, and corporate makes trying to have a community run site difficult - especially as the tools that one would use to manage, moderate, and curate it get more and more restricted.

The curious part of the "is this it?" with the digital services act is that it was signed into law 6 months ago (November 2022) and has provisions that have a 6 month window and concerns moderation of users and improperly removing their content.

Anyways, that was my unfounded speculation.

I am still disappointed that incorrect information written by a human isn't more severely moderated or curated on SO and SE sites. If I'm going to get wrong information, might as well get it from a source I need to double check anyways and is in a more consumable format. The value of SO was that "good answers are voted up and rise to the top" which is much less commonly the case anymore.
In what way does the technology disprove them? They're pretty general statements (I agree they're not really technical arguments).
>prevent the Apollo social network from becoming the next 4chan

The two forums in my top level comment do compare similarly as 4chan and reddit. The old one was previously known as the epicenter of shenanigans and memes in my language which has lost its shine, the new one being increasingly astroturfed and becoming more of an echo chamber day after day.
What are the use cases for this though? Such a small thing cannot carry anything or pack enough of a punch to cause any impact either
They're heavy users, but something tells me that they're also likely to block ads.
I'm generally against "AI same as human learning" argument but I don't think you could quite monetize recreated copyrighted arts as an art student. Van Gogh is only okay because the original artist isn't quite around.
If AI is such a risk to humanity, why are these tech leaders developing it? What an insane choice. I don't buy the transparent, 'technological development is inevitable' argument. Make it a secret project if you're worried about enemies eclipsing you.

Somehow, the public lets them off the hook for 'stepping forward' and preaching that it should be regulated, while they continue to risk the future of humanity.
IMHO that is of such little help and the drawbacks weigh much heavier: const-correctness spreads like a cancer (try making one thing const without having to fix a hundred other things), and often requires annoying boilerplate -- I'm no C++ expert but if these are still the best available solutions...: https://stackoverflow.com/a/123995/1073695

Sometimes I want to add one little extra thing that gets mutated in an otherwise "const" method, e.g. for debugging purposes. If the compiler doesn't let me do that because I valued the ideal of const-correctness higher than practical concerns, I know I've done something wrong.
> AI is likely to cause total extinction the first time something goes wrong

Maybe that is an argument you've seen, but the more convincing argument I know of is that we have no way of knowing we've gone too far until after the fact. Doesn't matter how many times it goes right first, we don't even know how to determine if and when it has gone wrong. A powerful enough AI could deceive us into thinking things are going "right".
Initially I was skeptical too but maybe Japan really can increase its GDP by 50% via AI-generated anime?

Would love to see the government report that backs this claim up though ...