skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Tennis for me(and ultimate frisbee, although not so much in the past few years)! Tennis is one of the few things I have found where I am completely comfortable going up to a stranger(maybe they are on a court, or have a racquet in their backpack) and asking them if they would like to play sometime. There are also teams one can join(competitive or less so), tournaments, for fun social groups. Its been very wonderful.
It's so hard to remember that JMAP isn't an April fool's joke...
> Just based on vibes yeah?

Not even remotely.

> Because the evidence

I've looked at evidence on and off for over 20 years. I've asked for disconfirming evidence. I've never seen it. Housing costs do not fall from market-driven buildouts. They may rise more slowly but even the evidence there is inconsistent (no surprise given supply is never the only factor). They don't fall except with at least regional macroeconomic changes of fortune. If you believe you're in possession of evidence to the contrary, by all means, surprise me. If you merely expect the evidence to be there because supply-and-demand, by all means, attempt to surprise me.

> theory

You may want to re-read my comment and note that I articulated a basis in economic theory regarding why market incentives alone don't cause housing costs to fall. Feel free to criticize that specifically if you're sure my position isn't substantiated theoretically.

> Southern cities are building more and growing rent at much lower rates

Yes, if you have substantial underutilized and geographically convenient land due to historical timing and HVAC advances, it turns out additional supply is cheap enough to build out (out being a key word) that developers aren't as strongly incentivized to maximize returns by chasing the higher end (and if they try, they face more competition from individuals or smaller hungrier teams).

Once you've left easy mode where building out is difficult (or has diminishing returns of its own) and are left with building up & redevelopment and regional demand is still sustained, the incentives change and so does how/what developers build & price.

> These policies just raise rents.

Even if they did raise rents, they would certainly not just do that, they'd provide a revenue stream and reshape incentives.

But I'm not sure they do. Explain how diversified vs consolidated ownership changes rent prices and why the latter might leave rents lower. Or hey, don't, and ask why I'd think the reverse is true.

High-rent taxes might get passed on to the market, but the owner keeps less and depending on how you construct them may also make the point of diminishing marginal returns lower, making increasing unit count on a property a better strategy.
OK. Sure. It’d be better, for you, a technologically savvy receiver of email. I can’t see anyone else in the equation that stands to benefit from this. I can’t see non-tech-savvy email receivers caring much about this at all, or any of its effects, until it has near-universal adoption. Part of solution engineering is coming up with something that people actually want to use.

So I don’t really see it as better. I see it as pie-in-the-sky fan-fiction to address part of what masked emails aims to address. A significant portion of the time that I used masked email, it’s in service of increasing anonymity (to the organisation i am giving the email address to), not an anti-spam measure.
A crooter once told me: "I don't get the feeling that you're passionate about these technologies." I told him that's because the "technologies" are tools for a job, and I feel passionate about a job well done.
It might be 4% of one year, but what about all the plastic produced in the last 70 years?
I disagree, I don’t think this is just about adoption curves and hype cycles.

I think fundamentally the infrastructure required to build decentralized applications is hard and has pushed the limits of computer science (zero knowledge proofs etc).

I think people have inflated expectations about how long it will take this technology to mature. Today it’s still very technically hard to build a scalable dapp that’s easy to use. Assuming this is something consumers actually want as opposed to a solution in search of a problem, this will take more time to solve.

Sometimes greed makes people think a technology is a lot further along than it actually is.
Founders sharing ideas, new markets and growth strategies
I use a secret strategy to finish long projects: I make them boring. I write down every cool idea for the project and choose the boring ones to begin with. I know that if I can complete those, the project will become more and more interesing as I get to the fun parts. From time to time I might bring a nice idea from the backlog to regain interest, but I really try to focus on the boring ones.
as far as I'm concerned the entire EEZ would be covered. If the government assert it's their territory to profit from, the same rights go along with it
FFII: President of the Unified Patent Court rewrites the treaty like a dictator
What is particularly irksome is that it imploded pretty directly as a result of the Spotify merger.
As far as I know, Apple has the NAND controller integrated into the SoC. The NAND controller needs to have ECC to keep the error rates on flash down to something acceptable.
> Most senior folks in Spain don't work for Spanish companies in general; they work for EU companies that pay more.

I doubt that statement. As a German living in Spain since the pandemic, I dealt with this and my social bubble is full of tech expats dealing with this, too. Living in one EU country and working remotely as an employee for another one, is almost legally impossible, and full of unnecessary hurdles for both employer and employee. Everyone of top-talent grade I know who does this, is basically either self-employed (as I am) or operates a "legal construct" such as having empty "mailbox flats" in the country they work for (breaking all sorts of laws by doing so).

The EU itself has never harmonized income tax laws; actually all of the EUs political system always tries not to touch the tax subject at all. As a result, each EU state has an individual double-tax treaty with all other members states. Yes, do the math - there are hundreds tax treaties between EU member states. Non of them are based on some EU guidance or blueprint, and oftentimes older than the EU itself (german-spain treaty dates back mostly to the 1960s with some minor additions in the early 2000s). Finding legal advice alone is almost impossible (i.e. a lawyer that speaks either of your languages and both legal systems recently well). And if you do, good luck, your fellow civil cervant at your tax offices will screw up your fringe case anyways.

Worker-protection laws apply by country of residence, but the employer is bound by their national ones too. If you live in Spain and work remotely for a german company, legally you are bound by spanish worker laws. That is, you get spanish bank holidays off, minimum wage laws of Spain (and Germany!) and so forth. Even when figuring out all legal subtleties, it is simply not manageable for any companies HR department to deal with all country specific regulations and changes, let alone in different languages. I run a company myself and could not employ a person from another EU country within reasonable effort; the only way to go is hire them as contractors or through payrolling agencies. Both will not make them your employees, which has a lot of other legal consequences (holidays, employee patent/inventions laws, but also stuff like you can't really enforce any policy on them without going through the intermediaries).
Building Team Pando in Team Pando
Here is an overview of which corporation contribute how many edits based on the osm account names affiliated with the corporations: https://piebro.github.io/openstreetmap-statistics/#b34d Lyft is the eleventh most active company by edit count with a total of 4M edits and 1.5M edits in the last year.

Disclaimer: I created the stats and website.
The issue is that there's a single monopoly provider who very much likes forcing all of the client apps to support their proprietary API. When 70% of users are Gmail, and Gmail has a vested interest in not supporting JMAP even though it's better, it's a hard sell for other client apps to invest effort.

The solution, of course, is monopoly regulation. AOL Instant Messenger was forced to interoperate and embrace standards. If our legislators had the actual courage to do their jobs in this day and age, Google would be legally required to shift Gmail features to using open standards like JMAP.
I always thought it's to prevent people from taking any advice and actually acting on it in a legal case they're involved in(as in IANAL so don't actually use my advice in a court case since it may be complete BS).
Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models
Usually not in my experience, as long as it’s within a short time (5 minutes?) since booking.
https://mattereum.com/sustainability/

You can find a ton of material here about exactly why tagging one NFT per object is worth doing. It’s a possible pretty decent fix for many of the problems continuing to run consumer capitalism in the current mode. Basically it gives a place for wear and use data to accumulate.

The wear and use data is accurate and trustworthy because it’s presented in a legal framework which provides real accountability for the people involved in the transaction.

We don’t know if consumers will accept it or not, but we do know that it works legally and technically. Early stage research.
There are some bacteria that we are aware of that eat plastic - Rhodococcus ruber is probably the most prominent - but my understanding is that we are not aware of any vibrio bacteria that does, and that's what they're worried about in the sargassum.
Stalwart is the other way around: Stalwart JMAP Server is an actual JMAP-native server, then Stalwart IMAP Server is an IMAP4-to-JMAP proxy, allowing you to connect with IMAP clients, and converting that into JMAP.

What you want is a JMAP-to-IMAP4/SMTP proxy, which is what the jmap-perl proxy is/was (or at least the IMAP4 part). On the matter of technology choice, note that most of Fastmail’s backend is Perl, so it was an obvious choice for such a tech demo being made by Fastmail devs. It wasn’t designed for production use.
Yep it's basically some PHP code and MySql backend, nothing fancy (save maybe for PDF generation).
Is that 3.5 or 4? I don't play word games with GPT but for coding tasks it went from unusable most of the time to absolutely indispensible team member between 3.5 and 4.
Sounds like something you should bring up with your doctor.

The only thing I've ever seen is a link between specifically MK7 (currently only sourced from Natto; MK4 is what you normally see in all other fermented foods and the majority of K2 supplements; MK7 supplements are very expensive comparatively) combined with large doses of flavonoids (often found in Vitamin C complexes).

I have not seen this mentioned in a study, but I suspect the combination of both may be an issue for a minority of people. Lowering the dose or switching to a more conventional MK4 lowered their BP back to normal.

As with any supplementation, no matter how innocent, always keep a Doctor handy to run labs: the difference between screwing around and science is keeping notes.

That said, studies like https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/Fulltext/2021/06110/Vita... and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7230802/ seem to indicate that even MK7, as opposed to just MK4, should be strongly considered for inclusion in the common multivitamin.
1923 cars had about the same wheelbase, and steering gear variety, and differentials... the basics were all worked out and agreed on.
>You're claiming that something I dont care about is affecting my life in subtle ways I dont realize.

You don't need to care about something for it to affect you. Do you need a citation for this too?

I'm claiming (actually merely stating, this is more like "water is wet" that some claim that needs support, it's almost a tautology) that systemic/social effects (what most people do, even if you don't do them) affect people in a society even if they don't participate.

Specially that the majority people using social media also affects people not using them. Because even if you dont use them, your friends, kids, relatives, colleages, etc, do.

The effect ranges from people simple things like people driving the car in the same roads as you while checking their feed, people staring at their screens when you go out with them, to friends/spouses/relatives/colleagues/kids being addicted, depressed, manipulated, misinformed, and generally affected in multiple ways by social media in many ways that then brush of to you (except if you live in a desert), to others expecting you to be participating there and treating you weirdly if you don't, and several other ways besides.

It's the same way for many other things that are seemingly "individual" choice. You might not care about alcohol or drugs for example, but if somebody in your circle does, or even someone you have the misfortune to meet, it can just as well affect you (or their friends, relatives, violent crime rates, the health system, road safety, etc.).
You're right, my bad, the article only says the bacteria attaches to the plastic.
Disclaimer: I haven't personally used either of them

Windmill says it's focused on internal tooling, whereas Noodl showcases many external apps which were built using their platform.
hasn't UberEats, DoorDash and their ilk already done all of this all while being super helpful to the point the restaurants were totally unawares it had been done?
Look at all this progress! https://blog.friendsofscience.org/2022/10/25/cop-27-the-show...
If you aren't a large scale merchant then PayPal can be very useful to you for recieving payments at low cost, although these days there are quite a few alternatives. However that market doesn't seem to scale up to a market value of $360bn ("greater than Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs combined" according to the article). Were the investors crazy? Can someone explain the thinking which supported that kind of valuation?
Given that White House staff [0] is 32% Jewish (2.4% of US) and only 24% non-Jewish white (55% of US) [1], the allegations raised by that post seem very plausible.

[0] Roles such as policy advisors, director of congressional outreach, director of labor engagement, etc., not security or housekeeping.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36119693
Call their bluff, make it illegal to do commercial/non-regulated work in AI and see how they change their tune.
> Holmes' former boyfriend and former Theranos president and COO, Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, was tried before a separate San Jose jury for his role in defrauding investors and Theranos patients.
> You don't need to explicitly interact with an event queue because it's a higher level abstraction that sits on a queue. In fact, that’s the big value add.

The event queue is an even bigger value add:

* It's the audit log

* A human reading the event queue has final say over the 'true state' of the system (insofar as such a thing exists in a distributed system)
I agree entirely, and I weep for it, I was even laid off myself. But I'm not going to waste any more time than that and am going to get onboard with where things are going.
I’m sure for part of the privileged bubble the author is in, but it’s super common for 20-something US tech workers to save >50% of take home.

Some certainly choose to take on more expenses like living by themselves, choosing luxury housing, having a nice car, spending on nice clothes and vacations. But it’s pretty common for people to live with roommates and otherwise not “ball out” while eschewing most of that - it’s very common for tech college graduates to follow the money mustache/boglehead financial strategy of avoiding lifestyle inflation and living like college students for a while. And if you do that, you could easily have living expenses at 40k/y or less even in an expensive city like SF, Seattle, LA, NYC.

And you don’t need an outlier income to save 40k+ per year (including 401k) on 40k of expenses either. The 401k contribution limit is 22.5k. Per smartasset’s calculator, you’d only need an income of about $100k to save $40k on $40k of expenses while living in California, (that’s without employer matching while maxing 401k). And $100k is a totally reasonable figure for new grad tech TC in California.
That was sort of what I was wondering, if the NAND controller has some extra Apple Stuff(tm) beyond standard ECC.
Only one account needs to be a regular account to support custom domains. The others can be basic - 2.50 per month (when paid annually) or $200/year total for 6 users (1 standard + 5 basic)
> It does.

Only sort of. First, this is a new feature, there used to be a whole section on adding "sending identities" and describing how to do it in order to send from a masked email address. I have support emails from 1Password pointing me to those docs as well. That whole section has been removed and now there's a note in the docs saying why (no date, though, so I don't know how recent).

Second, your description glosses over the fact that if I click the "from" address dropdown, and then in the filter/search field, type the domain associated with the masked email address, nothing shows up except "Show All." Why wouldn't a filter/search find the address? I have to click "Show All" and then repeat the search.

However, if I search/filter for any of the dozens of "sending identities" I created previously, the search/filter works correctly. So the UI is completely broken. When I search/filter something, and nothing shows up except a "Show All" button, that's the UI telling me that there were no matches. Oh, but now I learn that there are matches, they're just hidden under "Show All" (which should be renamed to "show matching masked email addresses" or something!?).
I think volunteering gets brushed off because in many places it is just a pure scam. The organizations collect money and then charge volunteers exorbitant sums for the privilege of working for free.

I looked at volunteering about 15 years ago and from what I saw then, I have never entertained the thought again.
About 35Mb IMSMR. Win98 could be stripped to around 50Mb without a loss of functionality.

NB L3 is unified most of the time, but but with L2 you still need to distinguish between data/code.
I thought these just attach to plastic. Eating plastic would be great news, right?
Yeah, it's gonna be similar in magnitude to 3 years. Not excellent, but not going to make a long run difference either.

That's without looking at estimates of plastic production, but it's likely enough to be higher now than the majority of the 70 years.
Sure, but much of Substack/Twitter/LinkedIn is clickbait. I thought this one at least contained a couple of useful items, along with some questionable ones. Which in my book would make it slightly above-average; although marginally on-topic on HN. Maybe the time has come to split HN's page or use tags: tech, language-specific, business, life, economy, knowledge etc. At least to keep the softer posts from pushing out harder ones.
> I'm suggesting a UI band-aid.

But what you're suggesting doesn't look like a "band-aid" to me. It looks like more of the same misleading information that ChatGPT's creators have been giving. Your UI message implies that ChatGPT is checking actual pinterest posts for the time period that's included in the training data; but it isn't.
> If India doesn't buy Russia's oil to resell to Europe, Russia ends up with even less money than they have now.

EU is buying through India, right? If Russia put fee's in place to discourage India from reselling, but EU demand didn't change, prices would have to increase, right? It's a two sided market, supply and EU demand, which makes this "If India doesn't buy Russia's oil to resell to Europe" seem impossible.
So it's far too soon to celebrate.
Looks like the nightmare becomes reality. June 1st unified EU patents will start and patent trolls will celebrate. [1]

[1] https://zenodo.org/record/7875960/preview/The%20Unitary%20Pa...
The page you linked says that they need probable cause to search any property within the zone. That's different from when actually crossing a border, in which case property is generally subject to search without suspicion.
The problem is Gmail. Google is a bad actor who significantly prefers clients have to support a proprietary API, even though JMAP takes all of the proprietary hacks Gmail built and standardizes them. (Things like snoozed emails, labels, etc. cannot be implemented with IMAP, but can with JMAP.) Supporting JMAP would mean clients that have hacky issues syncing things around labels and snoozed emails could just work, without having to use a proprietary Google API to do it. That alone would be a huge benefit to JMAP being not just widely used, but specifically used by Gmail.

The problem is Gmail compatibility has been used as a club to beat down competing OS platforms before, and Google has a strong vested interest in requiring clients use their proprietary APIs and features. Building walled gardens is the core way Google extracts value.

It's amazing how the people who have the hardest time believing in JMAP all work or have worked for the company that is most strongly vested in it's failure.
It feels like there definitely should be punitive damages?

It's like they didn't even check the text that ChatGPT generated for correctness.
Here's the mind-blowing thing: Temporal handles those type 2 failures for you. So they are the footnote, and then the saga pattern can take up the whole article
Hooks are IMO one of the greatest innovations in UI programming.

I'll draw an analogy.

---

Why did async/await replace callbacks? They are really the same thing, aren't they? Aren't callbacks good enough?

Async/await allowed programmers to write asynchronous code as if it were synchronous.

---

Why did hooks replace classes/imperative? They are really the same thing, aren't they? Aren't classes/imperative good enough?

Hooks allowed programmers to write stateful code as if it were stateless.

function MyComponent() {
const [value, setValue] = useState(false);

const buttonClass = value ? "on" : "off";

return (
<button
className={buttonClass}
onClick={() => setValue(!value)}
>
{String(value)}
</button>
);
}

This is functional code, without scary, hard-to-reason side-effects. Except for one limited part, which operates in a stateful way.

I argue that this is simpler than the equivalent imperative-DOM modification code, and the gap between these only increases with real programs.

This isn't just a weird "web bro" thing; the hooks paradigm is useful (in theory and practice) to every UI platform.

I even wrote an implementation (closed source) for hooks in Angular. It was lovely.
Also removes tracking libraries...
or a politician. even when presented with incontrovertible evidence, double down