skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I am actually looking at your story because the same thing happened to me and I hope someone here will provide help. I sew my own items and after $100 in sells I ended up with only $6 after fees, then lost that when they refunded my last order that was already delivered before banning me. Same as you. No explaining what rule I broke, and my appeal did end with an email that confirmed I am banned but with no reason.
A web/frontend developer is always a typescript developer if the job you are applying for is looking for someone with typescript experience.
The Jan Hendrik Schon scandal of two decades ago and the fallout from it point to how to limit the spread of fraudulent research into the accepted literature:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch%C3%B6n_scandal

The basic issue is that all raw data must be preserved and made available for scrutiny by other researchers after publication, as must experimental materials. Why?

> "The committee requested copies of the raw data, but found that Schön had kept no laboratory notebooks. His raw data files had been erased from his computer. According to Schön, the files were erased because his computer had limited hard drive space. In addition, all of his experimental samples had been discarded or damaged beyond repair."

The opposition to this standard is strongest in the corporatized patent-centric research sectors, which is most of applied science in the USA and China, etc. Ambitious academics in non-commercial sectors don't really like it either as it means competitors can jump-start their research by having access to their raw data and experimental protocols. Regardless, implementing standard practices with respect to laboratory notebooks, raw data, and experimental materials in any institution receiving federal research money makes a lot of sense - along with regular audits, with failure leading to a cutoff in funding.

This problem is much broader than just the paper-mill outfits the article focuses on; some highly public and contentious related issues are public access to the raw data, research records and database sequences from the Wuhan Institute of Virology from c.2016-2019, the raw clinical trial data from Pfizer/Moderna/J&J Covid vaccine trials in 2020, and so on.
But it seems that they're causing some trouble for the government if they're being targeted. Maybe their conspiracy theories contain some truth after all.
Giving semaglutide to children is nearing comical levels of evil. Getting children dependent on pharmaceuticals under 18 that they'll have to be on for the rest of their life to maintain a "healthy" weight is patently insane and this is all before we truly understand the long term, not to mention developmental, side-effects of these drugs.

We should work to produce nutritious food in the US that contains less poison before we offer drugs as a solution.
This is about knowing your audience. In absolute terms, it's true.

I'd rather that we didn't tie 15 minute cities to very low emissions or car restrictions other than reducing parking minimums and eliminating free parking on public property. You then don't have to worry about that whole class of surveillance.
It's not just the site. RARBG themselves were responsible for many of the video encodes, hence the "RARBG_DO_NOT_MIRROR.exe" included in many of them: https://torrentfreak.com/rarbg-adds-exe-files-to-torrents-bu...
If you do it right you don't have auto-detection because you don't have separate versions of the page in the first place. CSS is powerful enough to adapt a page to whatever viewport it happens to be displayed on.
So the theory is: Microsoft nerfs GPT4, a product they (basically) own that people pay to access, so that people will stop using that service and pay for another Microsoft product instead?
Anyone can build an OS without needing billions of dollars, and in fact there are state of the art open source OSes. Not quite the same.
I'm a technical writer. I have felt this a lot myself. It is very comforting to know that the man pages are always there if I need them. Same with the Rust docs. And Beej's Guide to C Programming (I downloaded the PDF). Conversely, it kinda sucks to have to rely on a website to get info. I will kick off a discussion around offline docs in the technical writer communities that I'm part of.
Videos of people breaking these make my TEETH HURT. No I have not been taking my meds, why do you ask?
Hypno Semi-Modular Video Synth System
I'm confused what the downvote means here. Did I get the story wrong somehow? If so I'd love to know what actually happened.
Check out https://www.bittorrent.org/beps/bep_0050.html .
Typo - I meant COVID Lockdowns. I'll edit if it will let me.
No. I'm pretty sure it is an exaggeration for rhetorical effect. You have to try really hard to put yourself in a situation where the only bathroom scale you can buy is non-connected. OP is either really intellectually lazy on this or is exaggerating to make a point.

Maybe if you go to an electronics retailer that also sells appliances like Best Buy, that's all you can find. But I live in a very techy area (San Francisco) and my local Target has plenty of non-connected digital scales for sale. For $10 more, you can get the connected version.
so... unless you can send us invites, your suggestions are not really useful to us
What did you exactly do to find it?
Enhance your coding skills with Coding Tricks, a succinct and informative coding snippet delivered to your inbox every few days. Curated by the Codehub app team, these tricks will help you learn programming languages effectively and efficiently.
My company is a couple thousand large and we have maybe 50 PCs in the whole org.
Have you come across any resource that lists hardware requirements for open source models (GPU/VRAM, CPU, RAM)?
> They are arguing for changing the status quo and that doing so gradually is more feasible than all at once.

This has been argued over and over and over, and it has made no difference whatsoever. All the limited-rights licenses that have been tried from time to time (MPL et al) have simply fallen by the wayside: because, in reality, nobody is actually interested in this "right to repair" - it was around in the Unix days and it was discarded, because it did not effectively serve users nor businesses.

What have had an impact are effectively two licenses: the MIT/BSD ("do what you want") and GPL ("do what you want but your changes should be public"). By adopting and leveraging those two licenses, the world was slowly steered where we are now - which is a lot better than where we were in the '90s but also where we were in the '70s. We got here by being radical in a punk sense: creating a world of software developed in the open, and fuck what was there before. It's not by bowing to established interests that we ended up with Microsoft developing in the open, it's by bombing their commercial spaces with open software. The minute you stop doing that, they will happily retreat behind the firewall.

> Turns out the world is a lot bigger than that sandbox.

The sandbox is the world at this point, closed software is retreating every day to smaller and smaller niches. You use browsers developed in the open, on websites built with opensource software. Even on mobile, the foundational frameworks are open - the most popular mobile OS is opensource. Obviously it's not a perfect state of things, but it's a world apart from the bad old '90s, and we did get here by keeping the Overton window firmly rooted at one end, thanks in large part to the FSF. It doesn't really matter how much software is GPL, what matters is that other licenses are defined in relation to the GPL.
Small tailor shops can't compete with industrialized cloth production anyways, as the luddites protested against and lost. As long as they can produce something else that can be traded, it isn't weird that clothes can just be imported. It isn't great for self sufficiency, but the reality is clothes are produced only in a few countries these days anyways.
> Contrast this with TSMC who needs to outlay ~50 Billion every 2 years on a new Fab which will deprecate over ~6-7 years.

Oof, that's the bit I forgot. TSMC's CapEx isn't just expansion, it's replacement. They're constantly upgrading to manufacture new technologies.

It makes sense now, thank you.
Imagine a world where all the raw data sits in a public repository next to a script to process the data which was reviewed as part of the publication process, which would accompany the paper and could be quickly and easily replicated with new data. Anyone could produce the graphs shown in the paper simply by downloading both and running them together. What a wonderful thing that would be. And you could imagine the government funding the storing and serving of all the data. What a wonderful daydream of an idea.
Responsive sites are great. If you really want a desktop view, use your browser's desktop mode. If it doesn't have one, find a better browser.
Are the clothes new or 2nd hand/vintage?

If new how does she survive against chains and internet retailers?
Hi, I've just fixed some dumb error in sshto it didn't work if ~/.ssh/config file was missing O_o
Fixed that, enjoy)
Right, but an org that accepts fake papers (now easily generated) gets outed easily and ignored by everyone.

Legitimate orgs with real review processes presumably sniff out the fake papers easily with their current procedures and don't publish them.

And I guess if AI gets good enough that an expert reviewer learns something novel by reading it then it deserves to get published.
How the (Mythical) Left-Right Political Spectrum Harms America (Book Review)
Wait, what?

order by random()

Does that even make sense? Why would anyone ever need this? Better to order by a stored value and randomize the presentation order, IMO.

Seems completely dependent on when random() gets evaluated. If it gets evaluated at every inspection of the row during the sort, I'm little amazed that it hangs some times.
Doesn’t it do that with the firmware itself, i.e. verify that the firmware was signed by the manufacturer before updating?

So the HTTP request leaks information about the update and could be MITM, but the result could at best be an older version? (Which could be a known exploitable one!)
Out of curiosity, did you try the same experiment without specifically training it on the MtG rules? Could it have all of that, including card interaction decisions, from its training data (sourced from the whole Internet)?
Taiwan invasion in 2025 gaining credibility; no time for Apple to prepare
cal, i love your work but please reevaluate the ticketing systems that you recommend; ticketing makes things fall through cracks because the nature of the incentives for the participants in the ticketing process all drive that way
Thank you so much for all this info and encouragement, I really appreciate you taking the time to share so much advice/experience & it makes the prospect of actually doing it feel way more possible/realistic. And thank you for the email offer - I may well take you up on it in the future. Nice to meet you Devon, I'm Ilya.
hahaha that's not a bad idea at all
Taxpayer Bill of Rights
Can you elaborate on what's misinformation?
Wait a moment. If 80-90% of guns used to kill people are illegally obtained, that means the laws successfully generate a regime by which guns are obtained much more safely. Now all that remains is to enforce the laws and crack down on illegal gun sales (although in USA that isn’t all since old guns already purchased illegally will continue to work for decades)

It’s like when people were saying that 80-90% of people dying in hospitals were unvaccinated. So vaccination helped right?
From what I can tell, the link doesn't seem to disagree with me? The quote I was responding two characterized `?` and `:` as separate operators, and I argued that they were in fact one operator with two separate syntax tokens. The link you provided describes `?` and `:` as a single operator, which is consistent with what I said. I suspect that the C++ standard doesn't disagree with me that half of two is one, which would mean that `?` is half of the operator, and `:` is the other half.
The nazi desire to exterminate all Jews was known. Jews were killed in the streets of towns. Some even involved mass killings. Towns bragged about being Jew free. Ignorance does not fly.

Yes there was some uncertainty of what happened at the camps. But it was well known even at the time that nazi’s camps meant death.
You're the one who said that India can suddenly import Russian oil much cheaper than before. So, using your logic India is selling oil to Europe at a markup. If Russia is selling to India at a small discount, then India is still making money directly at the expense of Europe.
First thing I do when I join a group that has code that writes and reads bytes from the wire is write really big stress tests and keep fixing things till it has 100% reliability, short messages, long messages, slow messages, pipe lined messageds, etc. etc. There's so many bugs where the code fails if len > N, len % N == 0, len < small N, len < what is read, etc. Like does this mean the driver had never worked for len > 126 or whatever?
Sounds like a great opportunity for shorting a stock.

They announce doing something with AI, their stock skyrockets, the new AI features don't noticeably increase revenue while their expenses go up considerably, stock drops. Profit.
To be fair, it is stressful to keep track of all the faceplants the new saviours perform
In sum, the article notes that in the industrial age all efficiency was essentially structural efficiency. In the information space that has become personal efficiency. The article suggests (via the example of Merlin Mann) that personal efficiency is potentially a losing battle, and suggests we should (in part) seek to offload some of this efficiency burden to be structural efficiency.

Hence, my take-away, the article discusses the tension of productivity as it comes from the organization and as it comes from the individual. Historically production line efficiency was gained by the organization optimizing how individuals perform. That has evolved to a technology and information space where it is _only_ the individual that can optimize their productivity.

The article essentially ponders the culture that this individual productivity pr0n has created. The mentions about Jira/Sprint style organization seemingly are thoughts & suggestions for how efficiency can in part be driven by the organization so that there is structural efficiency and not only individual efficiency.

There are a few examples as well of how personal efficiency can drive organization wide inefficiency (eg: blasting out an email with a question and demanding an immediate answer, efficient for one, and not efficient for the other).

One of the last sentences in the article summarizes this:

>> We must, in other words, acknowledge the futility of trying to tame our frenzied work lives all on our own, and instead ask, collectively, whether there’s a better way to get things done.
Show HN: WinkNLP introduces key sentence extraction
It delivers ~450,000 tokens/second on Apple M1/16GB
Oh! I’m really excited they are working on this - these guys are super smart!
When did people start to use “folks” in this unnatural way.
Vue -> Golang -> postgresql/mongo

I mostly putz.
I can't find it now, but there was a prototype someone made in the 2000s of a camera that, when you pressed the shutter, would fetch an image on Flickr that most closely matched your GPS coordinates + time of day, acting in a similar way as a "crowdsourced camera with no lens".

Fun to the see a modern reincarnation of that idea.

(While digging around to find the above, I did find yet another camera project that does the opposite: "Matt Richardson's "Descriptive Camera" sends your pictures to Amazon's Mechanical Turk and jobs out the task of writing a brief description of each image, then outputs the text on a thermal printer. It's a camera that captures descriptions, not pictures." (https://boingboing.net/2012/04/25/descriptive-camera-prints-...)
I still don’t get “hash shucking”
Great points. Will just add a point 1.5: There's usually an inverse correlation between ill intent and competence, so the subset of people who both want to cause harm to others on a mass scale and who are also able to pull it off is small
Can be both. Even Marx participated in the stock market
There are differences between China and the US... but government collusion with capital enterprise isn't one of them.
There really aren't, proportionally. Most of the cities are not reasonable to live in without owning a car.

And I'd rather if the bus was an option at all. The bus is expensive and unreliable in most US cities. Getting somewhere by car that takes 20 minutes can take hours by bus due to scheduling. This is a stark contrast to London, which has an actual public transit system.

Maybe I'm biased by living in Colorado Springs, where it might be particularly bad, but cities with sprawling suburbs are usually terrible for living without a car, and the US has tons of suburbs.
I forget which episode, but Andrew Huberman discussed somewhere how the incentives behind getting published in science journals and the peer review process often lead to poor studies.
Does this affect ACID guarantees at all? Could Postgres ever expect to read back a page with currently-changing data from the Pageserver before those changes get propagated there? Will the Pageserver cluster block I/O if it’s waiting on a page to reach a consistent state?
Typically:

1. Low latency network, 1-2us. Most servers can't ping their local switch that quickly, let alone the most distant switch for 1M nodes
2. High bandwidth network, at least 200gbit
3. A parallel filesystem
4. Very few node types.
5. Network topology designed for low latency/high bandwidth, things like hypercube, dragonfly, or fat tree.
6. Software stack that is aware of the topology and makes use of it for efficiency and collective operations,
7. Tuned system images to minimize noise, maximize efficiency, and reduce context switches and interupts. Reserving cores for handing interrupts is common at larger core counts.
Did Internet Explorer make you think Windows was junk or did you just download Firefox like everyone else?

You can.. I mean people know this right.. You can download software on Linux and run it just like on Windows.
Stuff like it is certainly the future though. Primary flaw of OpenAI's GPTs are that they're just dumb text transformers, "what's the next best word to follow". It just so happens that it can answer a variety of questions factually simply because it was trained on real (and imaginary) facts.

It needs to be backed up by a repository of hard knowledge and only uses the transformer part to generate a sentence based on this knowledge.

At the same time, as much as it currently hallucinates it's still nothing compared to the misinformation that humans perpetuate on a daily basis.
I mean lots of people have tried to build quantum computers, and so far no-one has succeeded in anything that's describable as a "computer", instead of "half a dozen logic gates". Perhaps in the future.

We can fairly well exclude the possibility of interesting quantum effects in human consciousness, because the human brain is a hot, dense environment that might as well have been literally designed to eliminate the possibility. It's the exact opposite of how you want a quantum computer to be built.

Which doesn't mean there aren't plenty of quantum effects involved in the molecular physics, but that isn't what is normally meant by 'quantum computer'. Transistors would also meet that definition.
I'm curious how you can keep that fed with data fast enough. What kind of interfaces to your network do you need to keep it busy and not just waiting on data.
Your examples contradict your ending statement. If results are what people care about, neither of those would have value.
Unix: Making Computers Easier To Use (1982) [video]
Why AI is incredibly smart and shockingly stupid
TED Talk
A 4-bit quantized 33B parameter model will fit on your GPU and you'll be able to use a 2048 token context too. (4-bit quantized larger models are better than smaller 8bit/16bit models)

You can run 4-bit quantized 65B models on your cpu, but it is slow, 1-2 tokens a second instead of 8-15 people typically get with a gpu, but you need two 24gb or an enterprise card with 48gb of ram to load them there.

https://old.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/wiki/models has the information you are irritated about not being listed.
That’s exactly the point. What you previously assumed review processes could catch is no longer true. AI can now infiltrate pretty much anything, especially if there is a Generative Adversarial Network (which “AI detection tools” can be used to train at scale).

And if you say it “deserves to get published” then taken to its logical conclusion, human generated content in all fields and interactions will soon be dwarfed by AI content and interactions.

The issue is that the AI can be switched out after it’s infiltrated and taken over, or it can be gradually used to shift public opinion or organize any sort of coordinated attack. Heck, a reputational attack is easy to pull off at scale within 6 months via AutoGPT already, and it takes 1 button press.

First they’ll separate us, then they’ll herd us into echo chabers and cause our protests won’t be heard by anyone anymore amid all the AI glut.

It comes gradually, then all at once!
Why do you need an electric tooth brush to begin with? Just get one of those old Jordan ones you can probably get one for as low as $2.
Not to mention the fact that the sort of drill a contractor might use will not be a "beautifully made work of art". It will be a Hole Hawg, and it might kill you if you use it wrong. Ugly, graceless, but it is well made and will get the job done. Not the kind of thing you just lend out to anyone in the community, though.

Neal Stephenson did a whole thing about the Hole Hawg, you'd think Cory Doctorow of all people would have read it.
I loved Dash when using a mac. But I've been full time in linux for the last 6 years and Zeal is the only thing _close_.
The article was oddly unsatisfying.

For me, GTD's biggest contribution was the focus on "Next Action". Which was mentioned exactly once in the article. I struggle with the perfect lists and I just can't get the Weekly Review figured out. But looking at some project and figuring out the exact Next Action (and sometimes associated Critical Path) is ridiculously valuable.

I've read a bunch of other productivity books. They have different ideas and approaches, but all of the practical ones seem to have this moment "and figure out the smallest, actionable thing you can actually do on that". But often, that bit is not front and center of the methodology. I suspect in the "3-day master course" for those techniques, they would actually practice such focus. David Allen just really put that front and center, explicitly.

Similarly, the Cognitive Behavior Therapy also uses this "Next Action" idea to get the person to move forward.

In that sense, I felt the article failed to truly look behind the curtain and just focused on a rise and fall of individual movement influencer. I did not see any mention of Lotus Notes (David Allen's own preferred solution), active GTD LinkedIn group, etc.
To be frank, MSI's "crap" provides battery life optimized charging, while Windows doesn't (and probably can't).
We're still trying to convince hiring managers to stop listing positions for "DevOps Engineer", which is akin to "Culture Engineer".
(PhD student in STEM here) I think most people have the wrong idea about what peer review is. My advisor teaches us to treat it as a first check, but it is not a guarantee of correct results.

Most of the time I spend on research is actually trying to understand the literature and reproducing their results. If I can't do it, it probably means I don't understand enough about the work I'm reading, but there is also the small chance that the published analysis is wrong, which already happened to me.

EDIT: typo.