skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't think "generally being right" is the same thing as "literally never getting anything wrong". Not every specific claim in "An Inconvenient Truth" was correct. That doesn't tell us much about whether Al Gore was "generally right" about climate change. His opponents at the time were mostly claiming that it either wasn't happening at all, or wasn't largely the result of human activities. What do you think is the current credibility of those claims?

I don't quite see how "everything will be solar in 30 years" is a prediction of global doom, by the way. If Nader said that and it's false, doesn't that mean things are worse than Nader thought?
You can do a lot on free ClickUp
Stop traveling internationally with that phone: yes, very possible.

Stop keeping that information on their phone: not always possible. Many highly-secure places require you to coordinate with an application on your phone when authenticating. In my experience, there is rarely a non-mobile option presented to users.
Maybe the middle ground here is an organization that simply monitors AI rather than enforces licenses?
wildly off topic but have you seen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5XPuS-Y0fg ? it gave me a lot of feelings.
Even if people understand this at a conscious level, it's rarely explained:

> and "keep scripts separate from your CSS and HTML markup"

was for documents, not interactive applications, with the goal being that a document could be reformatted through CSS for multiple different displays. The earliest example I can recall was web vs print (as in, in the browser go File -> Print; you can specific different CSS rules so the page prints differently than it shows in the browser). Screen size / mobile displays are other examples that came later.

React on the other hand is great for interactive applications, which have always worked component-style - a checkbox or a dropdown in a native GUI would be used multiple times and knows how to style itself, for example, which is the same as what a React checkbox or dropdown would do.

> "don't use inline styles"

This rule was broken simply because there wasn't a better way to do the component packaging at the time. Nowadays we have CSS Modules, which separates them again.
See "edit2" in OP.

I was very careful not to advertise the part as "the one solution" for any security problem.

That was mostly out of fear of liability, but I also wanted to make people think about whether the part would really help them with a specific problem or if it was just a gimmick.
There are probably thousands of lawyers that thought about using ChatGPT for their profession, most of them realized it lies and never got farther than that, maybe a few hundred actually tried it out and also realized ChatGPT was lying, this is the one guy managed to swiss-cheese-model his way through.
That's surprisingly well informed about tech for a judge.
Hi, I'm a Redux maintainer and creator of Redux Toolkit.

Can you clarify what your concerns are with RTK?

We specifically created it to simplify standard Redux usage patterns and eliminate common mistakes and bugs (like accidental mutations):

- https://redux.js.org/introduction/why-rtk-is-redux-today

We'd _like_ everyone who is writing any kind of Redux code to write that using Redux Toolkit, and we teach RTK as the default approach for using Redux. FWIW, we've had plenty of beginners tell us they were able to get started and be productive after reading through the "Essentials" tutorial in our docs, which walks folks through how to use RTK to build apps.
Because it's a feature customers ask for? What laws do you want written? How "secure" am I allowed to make my product before the Feds come a-knockin'?

And what does a "factory reset" accomplish? The hacker trying to get company IP (or whatever the password is protecting) gets three more attempts at it after the reset?

Finally, and I'm not saying this makes it okay, but e-fuses are common as dirt these days. I don't know that you're going to get that toothpaste back in the tube.
Considering how long it took for async, and the depth of proposals, I wouldn't call it rushed at all.
I got an interesting perspective on citizenship late at night at a remote Canadian border post.

While I have dual citizenship, I live and work in the US, and nearly always travel on my US passport.

The boarder guard gave me a hard time about traveling with my children and without my spouse, but after ascertaining that I wasn't abducting my own children in a custodial dispute, let me in, and then got chatty.

He said something along the lines of, "I could tell you were annoyed that I had to call your wife, but if your kids ever went missing, you'd be glad that we checked."

Since we were just having a chat and he seemed friendly, I let him know that I was a dual-citizen, and asked a few questions I'd had about dual-citizens crossing boarders. One of them was, "would it have made any difference if I was coming into Canada as a Canadian, instead of an American?"

His answer was, "As a foreigner, I can deny your entry into Canada for all sorts of reasons. As a Canadian, I have to let you into Canada so long as I don't have reason to doubt the authenticity of your citizenship. Basically, if I think you're a foreign criminal, I can deny you entry. If I believe you're a Canadian criminal, I have to let you in then arrest you."

BTW, he also let me know that the biggest reason that dual-citizens should travel on the passport of the country they reside in is hassles over import duties. AKA, if I'd been entering as a Canadian driving a US registered vehicle into Canada, he would have been suspicious that I was importing it, and likely to charge me import duties, or at least given me more of a hassle about making sure it was going back to the US at the end of our weekend camping trip.
Yes, I agree that initially, AIs will be highly integrated, and their goals will probably at least appear to be somewhat aligned with those of human societies. Similar to human corporations and institutions. But human institutions and governments go off the rails regularly, and are only corrected because humans can sometimes go on strike or organize to stop them. I fear we will lose those abilities.

As a concrete example, North Korea was forced to allow some market activity after the famines in the 90s. If the regime didn't actually require humans to run it, they might easily have maintained their adherence to anti-market principles and let most of the people starve.
Now please do macOS with MoltenVK!
OK, I completely agree that if you feel that I invoked "obviousness" in an attempt of browbeating you and the GP with what in fact is a social taboo, you should be extra skeptical (I'm not sure that was the point the GP was trying to make though).

> If your argument consists primarily of "everyone knows that" then this is a good indication you might be wrong.

It doesn't though, does it? There's strong empirical evidence that AI systems are making rapid progress in many domains that previously only humans were good at, and a pace that basically surprised almost everyone. I gave a list of arguments in another thread why AI is uniquely powerful and dangerous. Which of these do you disagree with and why?
No, but a winky smile after an intentionally inflammatory reply is usually indicative of someone I’m not interested in reading again. Doubly so when they refuse to use capital letters.
Yeah, I read all that. I still don't understand why/how the lawyers went ahead with the trademark process before the engagement letter was signed.

Like, I want to believe you, it just seems weird of lawyers to do the thing without the i's dotted and t's crossed. I can see software devs totally barging ahead, but lawyers, less so.
It all depends on the lodge! Many lodges are struggling to stay alive and are desperate for new members. It's not uncommon to find a lodge of mostly really old men where they lose more (to deaths) than they gain from new members.
I thought Etsy was an e-commerce platform targeted to arts and crafts? It makes sense to me that they would kick off a window safety system which doesn't seem to match their use case.
There's pretty much always something that needs to be done, even if I have some time when I don't have specific "assignments" or what-have-you. So I can always just grab something off of the "backlog" / "todo list" and work on that. And sometimes I do.

Other times though, I choose to use some "free" time for learning. I have a number of courses queued up to work through on sites like Udemy, LinkedIn Learning, Egghead.io, etc. And there's always Khan Academy, papers on Arxiv.org, JMLR, JAIR, or old conference proceedings from IJCAI or something interesting to read and study. Not to mention a huge list of interesting Youtube videos to watch.
Now this extensibility is what I’m interested in, as I’m working in a project which needs front end extensibility and have no idea where to start!
She had multiple charges but was only found guilty of defrauding investors. She was actually acquitted for defrauding patients.

https://www.mercurynews.com/2022/01/03/elizabeth-holmes-tria...
Taxing debt, the opposite of income, for sure is "innovative".
Curve is optimised specifically for very narrow exchange rates between stable coins, the opposite of pump and dumps. Way to make a fool of yourself.
Yeah, that's what I thought, but I still think it does the opposite job at first, making the petition owner seem to have no confidence in his petition.
Just like how these AI companies built these systems without interacting with anyone who actually makes art.
(supabase ceo)

Supabase gives you a full Postgres database, we position ourselves as a Firebase alternative because we offer a few other bells-and-whistles. The database is just postgres[0] and so it has more compatibility than bit.io offered[1]

[0] https://github.com/supabase/postgres

[1] bit.io compatability: https://docs.bit.io/docs/supported-sql
Seems like maybe a safety/liability issue? Someone has this part on their vehicle when it rolls over or ends up in a lake, etc, and a kid drowns or dies a fiery death because they couldn’t open a window? Seems unlikely and all, but I could see a lawyer deciding they don’t want that potential liability.
With all due respect, this sounds like a "old dog"/"new tricks" scenario.

"What's this .map() nonsense? The indexed for-loop always made sense to me."
> It’s a tool that can be used by those same “human leaders acting selfishly and harming the commons” except they’ll be able to do it much faster at a much greater scale.

Then, would you agree that restrictions would concentrating power further would exacerbate this issue?

IMO a fitting analogy would be: banning AI development outside of the annointed powerstructure consortium is like banning ICBM defense system research, but still letting the most powerful countries build a nuclear arsenal.
You misunderstand the state of the e-mail world. Running an MTA on a residential network for receiving is completely fine.

Sending mail directly from a residential network by connecting to the given mail domain is a nonstarter. Hasn't worked in twenty years or more. That doesn't require a MTA; only a MUA.

Your mail program (MUA) like Thunderbird or Outlook, or the mail utility in a Unix-like OS, can perfectly well work without a configured SMTP server. You send to bob@example.com. The mail program will do a MX type DNS query for example.com and find out that the mail.example.com is the mail host for that domain. It will resolve that again with an A query to get an IP address, and connect to port 25 of that host to send the mail.

In a world without spammers, that's how things would work.

In a world with spammers, mail servers block connections from random addresses like residential IP addresses.

Users (who want to send mail from home) have to resort to using forwarding hosts: their mail client is configured to make an SMTP connection not directly to a target mail domain, but to a configured host, like something run by their ISP or some commercial SMTP provider.
Sure. As I mentioned:

> It's true there could (and probably is) wash trading going as well as other forms of laundering.

There's little evidence of large volumes of wash trading specifically on BTC though, and it's pretty easy to trace.
It's a nice rhetorical question, which is why I raised it.

In practice, it's probably like the county in Idaho in which a law professor once posited you could get away with murder[0] because there'd be no "jury of your peers" to convict you.

[0]: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=691642
This brings up other questions too. Is the state on the client? How does one reconcile the server state and the client state. Is the client state a subset of server state? Is the client state a tree matching the view tree? Does the state contain only the UI data to be rendered or is it all app state.
> How did you know if they were "passionate" or not? I don't think being "9-5" is a good litmus test.

The Latin root of the word passion is patior, which means to suffer or endure. And I think that’s significant: having an affinity or appreciation for a thing isn’t the same as being passionate.

In the same way that I don’t see how working for (and being compensated for) 8 hours a day can be described as suffering, I don’t see how “passionate” is an appropriate descriptor for someone who only programs between the hours of 9 to 5 For their job.

When someone says they have a passion for programming, I usually take that to mean that their evenings are dominated by programming time, instead of hanging with friends, other hobbies, etc.

And don’t get me wrong, I don’t think people necessarily should be passionate about programming (nor expected to be).
Exactly. It's a nuance most people don't understand.

If you're crossing a border, customs having the right to search you isn't a silly idea - the government has the right to enforce customs and tax/duty laws. Being able to search items you are bringing across the border is in line with that.

Where I think the nuance comes in is that carte blanche search rights don't make much sense in a era when they can search you electronic devices that aren't really related to customs and tax/duty laws.
What makes you think this is for youth accounts, and is not simply the preference of the workspace administrator for your school?
A colleague tried 20 questions with ChatGPT and the answer they'd chosen was "Margaret Thatcher" (UK Prime Minister, the "Iron Lady")

ChatGPT got as far as basically narrowing it down to post-War UK Prime Ministers, which is fairly impressive although it only had a few questions left. Then though it decided the answer must be "Winston Churchill". Churchill isn't meaningfully a post-War PM. He lost the July 1945 General Election, which was before the Pacific victory.

It did guess Maggie, with nothing left, at a point where I don't think it had ruled out Blair, Cameron or Heath, let alone say, Liz Truss, but guessing Churchill first shows the limitations of such a model.
That includes airports as well so it's defacto the entire US
NLRB rules non-compete agreements are illegal
> A lot of the optimisations for efficient client-server sync require the server to be able to read the message. If everything were encrypted, the server would basically be a dumb blob store. This is particularly bad for mobile, where you only want to sync partial information. Users expect to be able to search their whole archive, so either you need all the data in the client, or the server needs to have access to the data.

> JMAP is therefore not introducing any new measures to address end-to-end encryption. The best advice is probably to run your own "JMAP server" on trusted hardware; otherwise you need to sync the entire multi-gigabyte mail spool to all your devices. JMAP is also simple enough that you could run the server on multiple machines with an underlying replication protocol over encrypted links and have that do your smarts.

They lost a huge opportunity. Encryption at rest of emails and E2EE should've been how we built these protocols from the start, here we get a chance to try it and... no, just "self-host" instead.

I enjoy self-hosting stuff, but it's just not what normal people will be doing, and they deserve privacy too. Also, self-hosting email is possibly the most complicated self-hosting task you can think of due to deliverability issues.

My biggest pain point with mail providers that support encryption, such as Proton or Tutanota, is that I have to run a "bridge" application that hosts the IMAP server on my machine, since otherwise there's no way to get the encrypted payloads into my mail client. Otherwise, I will have to use their proprietary client (proprietary in the sense it implements their own protocols). This sucks, and it could be solved at the protocol level with JMAP. I expected this to be a top priority of the Fastmail team when developing this, but unfortunately it's not.
I know the idea, but it's usually not 14-15 standards, it's usually like one really entrenched old crusty standard (if you are lucky) or (more likely) emergent glued-together patchwork of hacks.

It's definitely an uphill battle to introduce any new standard, but it does happen. USB-C, HTML5, ECMA6, I would say are some success stories.
I can't see VR becoming useful at all for general productivity. AR? Maybe. It'd be cool to have more monitors without taking up space. But even in that use-case, the resolution of current AR/VR tech isn't enough.

Even if you did find a way to make VR work for you at work, current headsets are just too heavy to want to wear them 8 hours/day.

They're still incredible for gaming, though.
> Gold and crypto are already taxed the same and on the same level (capital gains)...It's really expensive to secure my own gold

Gold bugs pay for their own security. Crypto outsources investigation, enforcement and regulation onto the public.

> how is crypto packets flowing preventing you

My taxes pay for investigation and enforcement.

> Don't you wish you could see JP Morgans or the Pentagons books laid bare like the blockchain?

No? J.P. Morgan is audited. Almost nobody dives into their various filings with the SEC, FDIC, Fed, and every state banking and securities regulator. As for the Pentagon, absolutely not–that's a huge national security hole.

> for us privileged westerners (assumption about you on my part) that this all this seems a little silly, but for my family and friends in situations where their government is behaving really badly, this is serious

I don't think it's silly. I just don't think it should be subsidized by us.

> it doesn't come to the US but it seems a little silly if you are rich enough to not hedge against that possibility

It's a common pass-time for the rich. Crypto, like gold buggery, is aimed at soothing an emotional need to hedge. The fact that those with most to lose play by a different playbook should speak for itself.
I agree to the idea of not ignoring Indian names. We do have India names as well on certain screenshots. To distribute well we used all kinds of names. We tried our best to globalize.
I would think that someone so gung-ho on unalterable ledgers would be less inclined to try to rewrite the facts of what's happened each time we've interacted — all interactions that you have initiated, I might add.

You seem to think that if you can make vague assertions that I've "brigaded" or "abused" or "bullied" or "sent an online lynch mob" after you, people will just take your word for it — and this is a pattern you've repeated several times now. They're welcome to review our past interactions, where you began by making massive assumptions about me and my motivations, where you continued to be incredibly arrogant towards me and towards others replying in the thread, and where I repeatedly tried to disengage. Taken aback by your arrogance and rudeness, I ultimately tweeted some screenshots of your own words, with the added text "this man called me vain last week" https://twitter.com/molly0xFFF/status/1516610542588284931 (and you had). As far as I can tell that's what you've decided was me "drinking your blood" (a bit over-the-top, if you ask me), rather than perhaps an opportunity to reflect on how you speak to other people.

Anyone reading this thread is free to see our interactions and decide if that's a fair characterization or not — again, I think the record speaks for itself: https://twitter.com/search?q=(from%3Aleashless%20to%3Amolly0...

I'll also note that we ended our last, unpleasant interaction by mutually agreeing to avoid the other: https://twitter.com/molly0xFFF/status/1517200861377839110. And yet here you are, blathering into the comment thread on a profile about me, because apparently your ego can't stand my mere existence. Perhaps your once-in-a-generation transformational intelligence could be put to use doing something other than coming after me at every opportunity, and then pretending I'm puppeting some sort of shadowy cabal to come after you (when the reality is that when normal people see arrogance of your calibre, they feel the need to comment on it).
I've been using Preact signals, which are also usable in React (though admittedly I haven't tried to use them). I've found them to be much more pleasant than useState (though I reflexively continue to use useState). I also use a pretty lazy pattern where I allow large portions of an application to rerender when state changes (implicitly by letting prop changes percolate through). For simple apps this works really well, and for complex apps it still works. Like I have an app with 200Mb of rendered DOM nodes that get rerendered from the root when anything changes, and it's totally fine. I wouldn't ship that app widely, but for internal use it's 100% fine.
This is fantastic. Is there a way to apply the cheats (IDKFA and IDDQD) by any chance? Fond memories of pretending to be sick so I could hijack my dad's computer to play doom.
The author could've chosen a better descriptor. What they're really looking for is overall image "coherence". Essentially things within the scene that are visually incongruous.
Yeah, personaly I started volunteering when I realised I had a surfeit of free time. I ended with a nearby charity, tutoring high school kids from less privileged background; not necessarily the most fun activity, but at least I got to keep my basic mathematics fresh.

But seeing how much time kids take, I understand not being able to do that now; most of the people in the charity where I volunteer are retired.
Can wealthy people influence where they are placed?
I don’t understand how $0 per outgoing email with MailChannels will cost more than $0 for a million emails.

For incoming emails, Cloudflare Email Workers are $0 per email and SendGrid is also $0 per email. We only pay for the cost of the Worker with this setup.
Keep checking - may be some other seller will pop up selling the same product.

You can surely figure out the business model working here.
She was convicted on charges related to defrauding investors and acquitted on charges related to defrauding patients. A juror told the WSJ “the jury concluded that prosecutors didn’t present enough evidence to show that Ms. Holmes knowingly pitched a faulty product to induce patients to pay for tests.“[1] Take that for what you will. I think it was easier to prove the defrauding the investors part. We know Holmes gave investors certain documents. We know those documents were full of lies. The juror described that as a smoking gun, and I don’t think there was any evidence so clear-cut on the patient side.

[1] https://archive.ph/zyLQ6
Folk music. I've been playing Irish traditional music as a hobby for years and it has always been an excellent gateway to making friends with like-minded people.

Pursuing a hobby seriously and finding others who are also into said hobby is a great way to make meaningful connections with others.
There are still a lot of good ones, but it's kind of become a wasteland of content (for me, to my tastes) in the last few years.