skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I had a look at the YouTube video -- I feel that an obvious question with regards to the "common sense" tests is, what was chat GPT-4 trained on? Was it partly trained on reams of questions used to test AI systems for example? How do you know it is "demonstrating" anything out-of-sample, especially if it is constantly being improved?

I've been learning some exotic programming languages recently, and my anecodotal experience is that asking ChatGPT to code in array programming or logic languages results in code which is highly non-idiomatic for those paradigms. Why is that? It mostly writes the code as if it was all just a funny syntax for Javascript or Python. I'm surprised at that if it really understood J or APL for example.

I am presuming that behind the scenes there are demonstrations of capabilities much greater than GPT-4 which are being used to illustrate the dangers of AI, because whilst I'm massively impressed by what's happening it is difficult to convince myself of a "qualitative" difference.
Anyone who thinks FedNow is a replacement for crypto has no understanding of either the Fed or crypto

They are just regurgitating tweets from someone else
1) I don't use containers.

2) I am using Ansible, to push out changes to the couple of RPis that now cover ~90% of my Internet-visible services (HTTP, DNS, SMTP, ...).
It's behind a waitlist
Session – an open-source encrypted messenger
It’s best to not confuse vanity for a utility. You can attain maximum expressiveness through organization of code without blinding hoping a convention of syntax solves such organization for you. Code is a utility, not entertainment.

The rest of my prior comment still stands. Web tech is super hard primarily because people are afraid of it, not because the technology imposes technical challenges.
There's definitely a tradeoff somewhere between fanciness and scan-ability though. Say we instead use a transparent mask, so there's both a discernable image in the back and a QR that gets reliably thresholded into the original.
tldr: LoRA fine-tuning of an open-source alpaca model.

See https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15717 for why calling this a private ChatGPT is probably misleading.
> And in this case: what are all these code of conducts for if people can destroy others work in this way and nothing happens?

In a "the purpose of a system is what it does" sense it's clear that they exist to make it easier to kick out people you don't like - especially people who don't share the PMC cultural background that's dominant in tech - without taking responsibility for your choice in doing so.
Absolutely. I am guessing they quantized the model (run it not in 32-bit but say 8-bit, saves resources). Just like they did with 3.5-turbo.
Could something like kei cars work in America?
I find that sticking with nerdy hobbies, at least where I live, also keeps you in awkward male dominated spaces; MTG, Warhammer, hacker spaces, arcade/video game things, all men.
Thankyou!

I live in Estonia (I am not Estonian) and while I know Finland and Estonia are similarly linguistically and culturally, I also know there are huge differences often due to the decades of USSR influence or occupation, respectively.

Re your comment on the cold war era and people still having influence, I read this article about a double agent coming to light only through his posthumous memoirs today: https://news.err.ee/1608974018/double-agent-secret-revealed-...
You really think a parcel of land is available for as little as 7000 gbp? That too apparently beach facing land?

Whats more likely here, there is an error in the website that captures these property transaction details or the person is lying?
So are you sure that isn't also nerfed?
Android phone

Settings -> Apps and Notifications -> Chrome -> Disable

I can't even click on links in email. It's great.
Two DHT search engines that might be useful:

https://btdig.com

https://bt4g.org
> In particular, simply receiving a particular iMessage – without opening it or interacting with it in any way – can allow an iPhone to be compromised, with personal data exposed.

So does this mean it is wise to turn off iMessage so that all messages come through as text message?
Double agent secret revealed after legendary Estonian art historian's death
> Indeed, the performance of an AI model like ChatGPT doesn't deteriorate over time.

Of course, the performance of an unchanged model does not. But finetuning the model over time can of course either improve or degrade performance.
I get mine third-hand or from the bargain-bin. Never over-pay for almost as good as new; like a car, used thoughts are just better price to value.
Thanks for writing this. Mentally healthy adults need to point this out more often, so that this patronizing-attitude-from-the-USA eventually finds an end to its manipulative tactics.
How to Handle Rejection
> It looks like unity of leadership and communication is needed between RustConf, the Rust Foundation, and the Rust Project.

This problem happened precisely because there was too much connection between the Rust project and RustConf leadership. Meanwhile, JeanHeyd has stressed that the Rust Foundation has been blameless, because they're aren't tightly connected to the project leadership!
I use the PARA system across all my platforms and it works great. https://fortelabs.com/blog/para/

And it should go without saying on hn that the everything software you seek is emacs org-mode ;)
I wish this approach were more supported by those producing documentation. Looking things up in reference docs is one of those cases where reducing friction yields huge productivity benefits, but I still end up using a search engine (Kagi now as Google hides authoritative reference docs under a pile of poor-quality, irrelevant spam these days). I've tried Zeal multiple times but while the app is nice and many of the docsets are good, many of them aren't good: badly formatted, badly indexed, outdated or simply nonexistent. A search engine requires no setup and covers everything. It's just so horribly slow.

If we were grown ups, all software authors/vendors would be providing their reference docs in a standardised form, findable, downloadable and displayable by a wide range of tooling, consistent across languages, IDEs and platforms. Zeal is the closest we have, and it's a noble effort, but IME it doesn't solve the problem well enough to be useful because there's no buy-in from the people producing the docs.

(First to mention ChatGPT gets slapped with a wet fish. Just try me.)
I'm not affiliated in any way or paid by Modular, in fact I criticize the marketing in the last paragraph, I'm just excited about Mojo and so the article sounded a little too puffy, I've rewritten it.
Prompting the LLM is no substitute for knowledge work
I once worked in an office which had fake grass all throughout the office. Any metal surface you touched would give you an instant static shock.

I now work for a start-up with no perks other than my salary and options.

> [we] were so preoccupied with whether or not [we] could, [we] didn't stop to think if [we] should.
I don’t think this is true any more. From my perspective rust has hit critical mass adoption wise. The hyper scalers are all using it, it’s on the way into the m$ and Linux kernels, developer mindshare is just a matter of time at this point
The context length is a different issue. But that was always a limitation with a GPT-4. Due to physics.
Good article from an intellectual curiosity perspective. I use the Philips Sonicare brushes, although I've been using 3rd party heads for years due to the cost difference (3X cheaper). Philips obviously wants to deter people like me from this behaviour. I see they no longer sell non-RFID heads, even when the old brushes lack this feature. Yet more e-waste as they try to nudge customer upgrades.
> To me, this why AVX didn't get widespread use

AVX has seen very, very widespread use across mobile, desktop, gaming, and server platforms. It's over 10 years old. Probably every hand-optimized vectorized x86 routine in the past 10 years has seen AVX thrown at it. Not every programmer can write it, but it sees absolutely tons of widespread usage and can be written by many competent programmers.

> If you want humans to use a performance feature, it needs to be easy to use.

In practice for general purpose "messy" compute kernels (e.g. parse this JSON/CBOR bullshit with SIMD) there is still a very wide gap between hand-written intrinsic code and what the compiler can generate. Most compilers in popular languages don't have the leeway to automatically perform the necessary optimizations/"setup" that a human must perform to fully exploit these tools, so this is not an easy fight to win.

For limited domains, and with the correct semantic design, however, you can either achieve or exceed human performance with high level semantics e.g. Halide.

> Yet the code itself is probably harder to understand and reason about than just a few lines of assembly code.

It's really not. Hacker news sucks shit to read code on, but the above code is in no way harder or worse than a raw assembly routine using AVX instructions. If anything it's less error prone, because the compiler takes care of a ton of incidental but necessary drudgery too, such as handling PIC (something 99% of people forget immediately) and eliminating the need for an outlined function. Not to mention you can leave the compiler to do all the annoying shit like sinking or coalescing stores/loads along the codepath, accurate DWARF/debug information without things breaking, etc.
Not everything is tracing and debugging, sometimes you really need to output intermediate results for "normal", "production" purposes. One could still abuse Debug::Trace, but that would really be ugly.

I also object to that "everywhere". It is far easier to just dump an extra 'print' line somewhere inside a for-loop than into a `foldl (*) 1 $ map (+ 3) [17, 11, 19, 23]`. And that is an easy one...
'Shape Up' Ryan Singer's Advice to YC Companies
I find stuff like that as annoying as you, but it has absolutely nothing to do with the current debacle. The current thing is purely caused by good old fashioned power politics between factions with different technical ideas. There is no "woke" angle at all.
Look where Blender has gone in 15, it’s a real alternative to other programs in the same segment. GIMP is a failure in that sense of never working with or listening to the users, and never understanding the userbase and having the wrong kind of developers attitude.

Even Godot is going with that playbook like Blender and doing what GIMP never did. It’s a shame imo.
They're up against a pretty difficult barrier - if we had a perfect all-knowing oracle it might easily have opinions that are racist. Statistics alone suggest there will be racist truths. We're dealing with groups of people who are observably different from each other in correlated ways.

GPT would need to reach a convincing balance of lying and honesty if it is supposed to navigate that challenge. It'd have to be deeply embedded in a particular culture to even know what 'racism' means; everyone has a different opinion.
We don't need Gimp anymore. The new sets of tools are being built in the open right now. It's just a shame Gimp couldn't make it.
John Conner, is that you?
Top Ways ChatGPT Will Accelerate Society’s Collapse
ChatGPT will destroy the world apparently...
> I'm sorry, are woman totally unable to handle hearing immature jokes?

In this day and age? Yes. Absolutely. Comedians often lament the death of comedy, and I can see why. People are super easily offended and even minor comments make them lose their marbles.
‘Penned’ tech specialists are earning six-figure salaries to ‘do nothing’
This is the kind of stuff that I see as being the crux of their downfall. Snippets have also gone to pot over the last year or so.

The overall theme is that product is no longer the focus, but rather navel-gazing - that’s to say, their internal world no longer aligns with the external world, and that is a fundamentally dangerous place for a business.
So these crawl torrent indexers and provide search functionality?

Do they also search private indexers?
PMC is standing for what?
The article doesn't ignore it, it addresses it directly in the section titled "Did Google put the claim to bed?"
FFmpeg is an amazing project that everybody uses for good reasons but it's not written with the extreme focus on security that writing secure C demands. If you're using it in an adversarial environment or with untrusted data you should be sandboxing it.
There was some competition amongst consumer goods producers and TV and other ads in the UUSR. High scarcity of good quality stuff meant they didn’t need to advertise but there was also an oversupply of junk nobody needed. Those companies has to move their inventories somehow since it was much harder for them to go bankrupt.
Imagine doing that on a city such as NY.
There are private trackers like PTP, but good luck getting in.
Why not share you gripes with the system so they get more exposure? I'm curious to know the pitfalls.
Building a ChatGPT Plugin with Go: Creating Interactive Wardley Maps
In this article, I share my journey of building a ChatGPT plugin using Go that enables ChatGPT to create interactive Wardley Maps. Wardley Maps are a powerful tool for strategic planning and decision-making. With this plugin, ChatGPT can assist users in visualizing and analyzing their maps, providing valuable insights and facilitating the mapping process.

The article covers the technical aspects of creating the plugin, including the Go code for the plugin's REST API, how to validate the configuration using CUE, and the integration of the plugin with ChatGPT. It explains the process of designing the API endpoints and handling user requests to generate Wardley Maps based on component placement and evolution stages.

Additionally, the article discusses challenges faced during the development, such as displaying SVG images within ChatGPT and finding workarounds to ensure proper visualization. The author also highlights the importance of security considerations when handling user-generated content within the plugin.

Whether you are a Wardley Mapper, a ChatGPT user, or a Go developer interested in plugin development, this article offers valuable insights and practical examples. It showcases the potential of extending ChatGPT's capabilities through plugins and opens up possibilities for future integrations with other tools and frameworks.

Read the full article to learn how to build your own ChatGPT plugin and leverage the power of Wardley Maps in your strategic decision-making process.
Thank you for everything you've done.

Your efforts did not go unnoticed and you will be greatly missed.

I hope the circumstances of your lives improve and that you can find normality in these difficult times.
There are Other Torrent Sites'
Like so...

https://rargb.to/
https://www2.rarbggo.to/
https://www.rarbgproxy.to/
https://rarbgmirror.org
https://rarbgget.org
https://rarbgaccessed.org
https://rargb.to/search/?search=Skinwalker
https://rarbg.to/torrents.php
and This one.
https://www.1377x.to/
I haven't used 4, just 3.5 on free tier. The only change I've noticed is that it is significantly slower. Which leads me to suspect that degraded quality could just have to do with tuning their product to use less compute.
First, a sincere thank you for all the efforts you have done. My collection of TV shows is nothing but ION10 webrips. You will be missed.
While I can respect your decision, I have to ask: Why the hell did you not choose to ask for donations or monetize the website?
While there are many that cannot afford to purchase, there are plenty of hackers that could have / would have supported you.
Eventually we will not only need on-device ML assistants but even more so then, to own the whole stack from hardware bottom up.
This is a nice idea. The problem is longevity. I'd be willing to bet this product disappears after a few years (best case scenario) and you are left with no ability to buy new heads and end up binning the brush. So net net you probably waste more than buying a Philips/Oral-B brush that likely has 10+ years of support for brush heads, which have a far lower environmental impact than replacing the brush. In terms of cost, if you buy the well known brands when they are on sale, they're generally pretty cheap. I'll admit they do try to sting you if you buy at RRP.
Maybe I'm blind - but i can't seem to figure out a) what you get when you pay for Dash on Mac vs download? Or b) why i can't use zeal on Mac?
I would also add: Don’t be an expert beginner. At some point you have to focus on solving real business problems as opposed to mastery of tool usage or configuration.
Lying to a federal investigator is an offense. It's usually how the feds get you if they can't make anything else stick (see Martha Stewart).

Usually with the border patrol stops a vehicle they ask if there are any non-citizens in the vehicle. If you lie at this point and they don't believe you it would likely give cause to investigate further. So either tell the truth or shut up.

Given that any documented not-citizens are supposed to carry their permanent resident card or passport with them at all times then the assumption is that any not-citizens are doing just that so can easily prove their status. Not everyone does and in recent years they've been policing this a lot harder than they used to and you can find yourself in hot water if you encounter the wrong officer (most cases you will get a very stern talking to).

So if you aren't carrying a permanent resident card or passport then the assumption is that you are either a citizen or undocumented. How hard they push to find out which depends on the bias of the officer making the stop.
Who would be "striking first" if "the North shows any signs of using a nuclear weapon"? Using a nuclear weapon would indeed be deemed an act of war. That sounds like self defense.
It just was a completely different era. There was no consept of what we today call open source, no compilers freely available over the internet, no internet to speak of for that matter, no cross-platform/multi-platform compilers to speak of, more platform diversity than now, FORTRAN was also a vastly smaller language so you could have implemented a compiler in a reasonable time if you didn't want to shell out $BIGBUCKS to buy one, optimizers (which are deep magic and really hard to write from scratch) weren't yet a thing, there were no standardization bodies that worked on programming languages, everything was vastly less connected than today. That obviously leads to redundant work.

No matter, the point is that nothing has ever stopped anyone from writing a competing Rust compiler, certainly not any imaginary "committee." Nothing except the fact that, besides mrustc, nobody has bothered because why would you do that?
if you run it as a browser app then yes
> once the novelty wears off it's still really hard to beat working from home

For you, it’s really hard to beat working from home.

For some people, it’s really hard to beat working from an office.
Oh I'm guilty of this. So many projects that were not launched. And the easy default for us (developers) tends to be coding & building features. But even if you ship, you have to continuously ship. And by shipping, I mean, you need to continuously tell the users. You ship it, you announce it, you need to market it, send out newsletters, feedback, improve, email the users again, cold-reach-out to other users who might be interested, and on and on we go. This is why it's difficult. Are you ready to put in as much work into these non-technical work? I wasn't and I was certainly unaware.
I am trying to offer counterpoint to what seems to me as an unjust critique from a person who, at first sight, does not know much about Haskell.

Also, a link to a useful library is not a bad thing for anyone curious about Haskell. Thus, there's a bit of education there.

If it looks like improv, I am here every evening till Friday.
Yeah it's really annoying for the government officials to have to prove you're a criminal before treating you like one. Imagine founding a nation where these employees had to actually do that?

When collection agencies perform secret searches of your property, that's a crime! Call the police.

What happens in public is different to what the government or anyone else can legally do to find out about what you do and have in private? Search warrants exist based on that distinction. Crazy I know but true!
no it's definitely GPT4.

I'm not sure why the share page says "Model: Default" but it's "Model: GPT-4" in my webui. Seems like a bug in the share feature
Could this be shreaded for building insulation or incorporated some other way into the building materials?

The amounts are too large for anything else.
Intel’s Revival Plan Runs into Trouble. ‘We Had Some Serious Issues.’
And lots and lots of third party docsets: https://zealusercontributions.vercel.app
https://archive.ph/zWRxh
I don't think this is on target. Seven years ago there were already attacks on the right to protest in democratic societies. I can remember reading slashdot in the Bush years, hearing complaints of free speech zones (where protests at major public events were constrained to certain areas). In particular growing up at that time, I understood that September 11, 2001 was some kind of a turning point between the grand old days of democracy and the modern decline, the growing authoritarian state.

Before that, there have been complaints about many legislative proposals in democracies that were directed against the possibility that such-and-such a policy might be used against the general public if an authoritarian government were elected. Nowadays, complaints against similar policies are provided as prima facie evidence that the government is authoritarian. I think the distinction between these two positions is interesting and worth paying greater attention to.

Anyone who is familiar with the history of democracies knows that there have always been laws against disruptive protests, whether couched in exactly those terms or otherwise. And they have always been used against disruptive protesters. One issue is that in a democracy you expect the law to reflect popular sentiment, and protesters are often protesting against the broader public. It's foolish to expect anything different. During the development of democracy, people said "there shouldn't be a law against this protest, but there is yet I will protest anyway and get arrested and people will find the penalty I will receive in their name unpalatable and it will shift public opinion perhaps moderately in my direction" whereas now they say "there shouldn't be a law against this protest, but there is, therefore we are an authoritarian hellhole".

If your goal is to change public opinion, then you must direct your actions to changing public opinion, not disrupting people. If you believe disrupting people will change public opinion, that's great but describe a realistic mechanism. Weight its tradeoff and risks. Plan it and strategise and choose a method because, given the laws that exist and the power centres that exist, it will be effective. Don't choose a method because some dead philosopher said you have a right to it. Aim to be effective.

There was no golden age of democracy. Democracy is just a struggle. It is a struggle to change public opinion and it is a struggle to bring public policy in line with public opinion.
I don't think it's even using inheritance - List implements a few interfaces though?
Why would anyone fight on both sides? Seems ridiculous.
There are a fairly large number of basic grammatical errors in this paper, which seems unusual for a paper of the quality normally expected by Nature.
Your assumptions about micro-aggressions existing are wrong. "Don't be an asshole" is (or should be) about how you act towards others not how others perceive your actions. If someone wants to be offended, that's them not being cool.