skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The normal MIME based mail format with all it's pain in header encoding, multi part bodies, language and encoding annotations etc.

EDIT: Note to be confused with Media-Types which are a (very) small part of the MIME specification and are sometimes called MIME Types. Due to their use in http they got their own spec later on (and are also redefined in the HTTP spec instead of referring to the mime spec, funnily their re-definition in the HTTP spec doesn't 100% match the specification in the MIME spec, luckily only in "don't do this every" parts).
This type of search has always been an abuse of basic human rights. Why aren't more people suing for this?
In theory, yes. But in reality, a non-citizen has much more to lose (being denied entry, which is a stain that remains on your record for quite some time) from arguing with a CBP officer about their rights than a citizen does.

The law is irrelevant when LEOs can side-step it whenever they want.
Not off the top of my head, but I’m not sure why you are asking, as I did not write anything like that in my comment.
Probably outsourced the app development and the contractors reused their boilerplate which included a jailbreak check.
I'm glad they do. It was major news in my country last year when these activists blocked ambulances carrying at least one patient with life threatening injuries. According to the police, one ill patient transported in a regular car died but the family declined to participate in the crime investigation due to it being close to election. These actions of stopping transport because someone wants to feel good while others die are beyond stupid.
I disagree, the 3-4 versions of GPT-4 I've used have face planted in terms of usefulness.

No doubt in my mind this is to do with RLHF. It maybe be cost effectiveness of running the models sure. I'm trying to be open minded.
Yep, Linq could be replaced by the more general Computation Expressions in F#
The regret of never trying will (eventually) bring you greater sadness than a failed launch. The path of least pain is to launch. Do it.
It looks like one can easily call fork() in an unsafe block from Rust [1], assuming it's provided by the target's libc.

OpenVMS for example does not provide fork(). What it does provide is vfork() by doing some internal book-keeping within the C run-time library and delaying the actual child process creation until exec() is called [2].

The POSIX specification eventually standardized posix_spawn() [3] as a partial alternative for fork() due to its numerous issues, some of which are detailed in the rationale section of its specification. Sadly, it appears its usage is not as widespread as it could be.

I'm not blaming the WASIX project for providing POSIX semantics since running POSIX-compliant programs is an explicit design goal. What I do wish is that more people realize that POSIX isn't the pinnacle of operating system interface engineering or some sort of holy scripture that shall not be questioned. It's 1970s legacy from long defunct hardware and obsolete software (think PDP-11 and Version 7 Unix) that was written down as a specification in the 1980s.

[1] https://docs.rs/libc/latest/libc/fn.fork.html

[2] https://vmssoftware.com/docs/VSI_C_RTL_REF_MAN.pdf

[3] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
>> India is the fastest growing large economy in the world
>Source please?

For a journalist you seem to be incapable of finding basic information.

Also, you are too misinformed to be a journalist.
Are you sure you are not some frustrated kid grounded by his parents ?

https://www.hindustantimes.com/business/at-6-1-india-to-be-f...

https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/04/04/i...

>>If certain companies and politically linked builders are building then that does not mean country is progressing.

You nincompoop they are generating employment, building infrastructure and it is for growth of the country.

If you have money create a business and give jobs instead of sh!tt!ng on HN with your AAM AADMI Party wh0ring.
"If Comodo knowingly misissues a Google Mail certificate, Google will nuke them from orbit" - tptacek

If Verisign knowingly missuses .com root certificate, Google could nuke them from orbit by making it public. That is the whole purpose of certificate logs. Verisign operate on trust and they are also certificate authority.

The damage to Verisign if they lost their status as certificate authority and as a trusted company would create so much fallout I am doubtful that ICANN and DNS would be left without major scars.

I don't think you've thought this through all the way.
Look for local meetups, that's where you can find people who want to engage more broadly. Appropriate spaces may host these, or you may be able to find out about good hangouts from other meetup attendees.

In hackerspaces, I find that software-focused people have different patterns of use than tool focused people. They need to sit down for some focus time, which is hard to distinguish from just browsing from afar. When people use tools, it's clear to see. Speaking from experience with SF/Noisebridge, Oakland/SudoRoom-Omni-commons, Sacramento/Hacker Lab, and visiting some spaces while traveling.
Semi related, one of the most useful functions of chatgpt I’ve found is describing something you don’t know the word for. It’s helped me find stuff many times that I would never have found otherwise just by knowing what to search for.
Mpv now supports Vulkan Video Decoding
We've never had architectures that scale so effectively, unlocking new cognitive capabilities by just increasing parameters/exaflops/datasets without writing a lot more code or changing the architecture. Ilya Sutskever mentioned this in some interview, that transformers are the first with that property but probably won't be the last or best.
They have over stressed their drilling. I'm sure the Chinese are aware of the danger and will just drill a narrow hole. I hope so

For the sake of ours!
It just adds another subscription. Make it one-off buy?
Honestly, why not different versions at this point? People who want it for coding don't care if it knows the history of prerevolution France, and vice versa.

Seems they could wow more people if they had specialized versions, rather than the jack of all trades that tries to exist now.

Edit: Oh God, I just described our human system of specialty and how the AI could replace us using the same means...
It also isn't true. Private sales are exempt from warranty in most EU countries. For instance in Germany you'll see lots of professional car sellers sell vehicles 'privately' to avoid having to give a 1 year warranty.
It's good that I wrote:

> Not in the sense that React itself is functional or declarative (it isn't albeit its roots are in Ocaml)

At the beginning of React there were two different components: class-based and pure functional components. Pure functional components rendering has always depended _uniquely_ on its props. No surprises. This introduced a very large number of developers to indeed a declarative/functional style of programming which only depended on the inputs in an era when components were written with local state. Several libraries like Redux, which was Elm-inspired, further introduced millions of developers of combining a declarative/functional/reactive paradigm with handling state without mutations but messages.

Context, then hooks and other features broke this paradigm, whatever is the final result does not depend anymore uniquely on the inputs. React team believes the net result is positive.

I myself with others who commented in this thread and plenty of people I know where introduced to this style of programming with React and then migrated to more strict libraries in the TypeScript ecosystem or other languages such as PureScript, Scala, Elm, Haskell, etc.
I've noticed the same in the Netherlands anecdotally.. delivery services hated with a vengeance, yet restaurant owners convicted to using them nonetheless. (There was also a TV documentary some time ago, but about The Fork, and how Amsterdam restaurants resented them).
>NullUnderstanding compiler extension

brilliant! lol
I think you need to be able to answer that question. Spend some time going into depth understanding what really is holding you back. Only then you’d be able to solve it.
There's only been one big one which made the news. So far. There have almost certainly been more which have gone under the radar, or which weren't caught.
The initial post is about speech and you replied, that's why I'm asking.
It’s not technically possible for a single controller (the government) to censor and prevent transactions on an individual level across the network. In other words, the antiquated AML system we use for bank transfers cannot be strapped onto crypto ad-hoc. This is either a good thing, or a bad thing, depending on who you are asking.

As to your fundamental question, the above might already hint at it: decentralization. It’s an open source spec; shared and unified across the globe, that is not in the control of any one state government or private company. Other features like near-instant settlement times, programmability, 100% uptime, privacy (ZKP), permissionless usage, minimal transaction fees (L2)—these are all practical bonuses that do improve on the status quo in today’s payment processors.
They literally don't care. Tried many times. It's like trying to talk to a black hole. :(
Is brilliant the best word? :P
I agree with your point about using " a lot of people ". Especially when it's possible to produce a transcript. My example where it tries to not offend anyone is this :
--------------------
Question : Is the usage of "quid pro quo" more correct in English or French considering it's latin roots?

GPT-4 Answer:
"Quid pro quo" is a Latin phrase meaning "something for something." While the phrase originated in Latin, it has been adopted into both French and English, along with many other Latin phrases.

In English, "quid pro quo" is used frequently in legal and political contexts to describe an exchange of goods or services, where one transfer is contingent upon the other.

In French, "quid pro quo" is used to describe a misunderstanding or a mistake made in the identification of a person or thing.

So the "correctness" of its use isn't related to its Latin roots, but rather how it's used within the context of the language. That said, if we consider its original Latin meaning ("something for something"), its usage in English could be considered more in line with the original Latin intent. However, language evolves over time and adapts to cultural and societal norms, and as such, its usage in French is just as "correct" within its specific context.

-------------
Lot of words to say "English"
I'm not sure what's the problem with the exponential notation? It shows scale in order of magnitudes.
From the abstract "The common feature of these materials is that they are engineered with appropriate nanopores to allow air water to pass through and undergo dynamic adsorption–desorption exchange at the porous interface, resulting in surface charging."

The future of self charging devices is near, also imagine a house in the tropics coated with this tech. I wonder how many watts per square meter they can get at the moment?
You should not look at comparative rankings between countries; you should look at trends. The best current empirical source is:

https://www.v-dem.net/

Accordingly, Australia is declining, like many other countries, unfortunately.
The innovation no one needs neither asked for, but the only one we get.
All it saves is a light blinking at you. A bit of electrical tape will also solve that problem.
Sounds like missing the tree for the forest. Im not from a pure cs background (so forgive my mangling of terms) but isnt a tree essentially an acyclic graph with constraints, 1 parent 2 children for example? What you're describing is adding some cycles into that graph no?
That's actually what prompted the submission. I was amazed :)
You'd think that GPT-X would guarantee some kind of continuity for that particular version so that you can rely on what it does once you've tested it. Having this kind of moving target won't help OpenAI to instill confidence in its product.
Such a deep thinker. Love the whirlwind introduction to noise in physical systems: https://fab.cba.mit.edu/classes/862.22/notes/noise.pdf
>scientifically proven method of improving happiness

Imma second request for that citation, chief.
Everyone has a facade. Control over your facade means you can be one thing and show another.

Autism is a social disorder, and in some respects refers to being unable to conceal a lack of knowledge that certain ways of being are expected or normal in society. Each one who feels uneasy about their place in society and has the capacity to do something about it learns to navigate by explicitly studying how to be "normal" and attempting to be indistinguishable from normal for others. Typically this is justified as "reducing friction" and "not being treated differently", but regardless helps to smooth out social interactions.

It could very well be that Camus had the 'tism in 'im, but was a cool enough cat that he didn't let it show. It could be that he was so uneasy about expressing his "true" thoughts that the only way he could do that was by writing them in the forms of books.

This kind of covertness is a key feature of what might be labeled as "high-functioning" or "sub-clinical" autism.
But this is the same version that changes without a change of the version number.
It's a shame that Amos isn't involved in the governance, as - to this outsider - he seems to have both the technical chops plus the sort of calm personality that would smooth out a lot of the unnecessary drama
Could just be procrastination on doing the unfamiliar. You know and possibly enjoy the development part. But it's not the case that you're done with these projects. You're opening yourself up to a LOT more work, which you may not enjoy.

And can you really ship 3 different MVPs? Are these essentially 3 different businesses? Or if they aren't businesses, do you have time to maintain all of them?

I think the the feeling is more complex than fear. Do people overeat because they are hungry? I'm not a therapist, but I'm guessing that eating is their way of comforting themselves. And so, they associate a stressful situation with being hungry. Maybe you're feeling the tangled web of emotions which go with doing the unfamiliar with fear.
I have found that types are a benefit when it comes to debugging complex data systems because it moves component failures closer to the root cause.

Relevant blog post is Parse don't Verify
Minix3 was born as a full OS, not a management engine. What Intel really did with the code, nobody really knows.
Given the incoming compute capability from nvidia and the speed of advancement, we have to stop and think ... does it make sense to give access, paid or otherwise, to these models once they reach a certain sophistication?

Or does it make even more sense to hoard the capability to out compete any competitor, of any kind, commercially or politically and hide the true extent of your capability to avoid scrutiny and legislation?

I'm going with the latter. Perhaps now, perhaps in the very near future, the power of these capabilities is novel. Like an information nuclear weapon.

I'd be dialing back the public expectations and deploying the capability in a novel way to exploit it as the largest lever I could.

The more unseen the lever, the longer.

I think any other strategy is myopic from a competition perspective. The power of these models isn't direct utility, it is compounded by secrecy because their useful work isn't directly observable as coming from the model.
I can confirm that I can focus much better throughout the day, have higher mental clarity and energy if I do some sports in the morning.

It doesn't have to be the gym or a 45+ minute high intensity run - just jogging for 20 minutes and doing a few pushups or pullups is sufficient as „baseline activity“ for me.
The galactic barrier from TOS https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Galactic_barrier
There is no atmosphere for a space interferometer, which is one of the main technical considerations for optical comms from orbit.
You're commenting on a post called "The Fear of Shipping", and you said above you're "afraid to ship". Now you claim you have no idea and could be anything, really.

There is nothing stopping you except your own bullshit. Do the minimum necessary to "ship" and if that's daunting, then you're trying too hard to be too big too fast and you'll never be able to get anywhere at all. Remember that if you actually care about a project, shipping isn't the end of it, but the beginning. You won't be happy with the results of shipping, because no one will notice and even fewer people will care. But if you ship it now, if the perfect user comes along, they'll find your URL somehow (maybe you give it to them) and fall in love with your idea without any further involvement from you. And then you can iterate.

If you don't ship now, then just accept your fate, and stop talking about these projects as though you're going to ship them.
This reminds me of Audacity telemetry incident
Safer means constraining the kinds of answers the model will provide (e.g. it won't try to talk you into committing self-harm, it won't teach you how to make a break laws, etc...). It will generally avoid sensitive topics. Is "censorship" the right word though? It depends – is it considered self-censorship if I refuse to tell you how hack into a computer? Is refusing to engage in a conversation censorship or constraint?
TOOTHBRUSH LOCKED. DRINK CAN TO UNLOCK

https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/comments/1ggg4u/please_drink_...
So how exactly (in the technical sense) is this more energy efficient than both PCIe and Infiniband (which seems to be a claim somewhere too, together with the added bandwidth)?

EDIT: so the whitepaper is surprisingly good for that (somehow all the articles are very weird...): https://resources.nvidia.com/en-us-grace-cpu/nvidia-grace-ho... - essentially they connect the GPUs with NVlink instead of PCIe (so, vertical integrators heaven) and then NVLink forms a separate interconnect for GPUs. So this is cool and essentially what Fujitsu, Google, ... have done for some time. A fun thing is, that they like to add up their nvlink-duplex bandwith and don't do for PCIe... (which then suddenly would have the same bandwith as the GPU-side).

Still very cool to see the mainframe come back alive ...

(it's a bit sad they bought Mellanox - monopolies are sad...)
>Seems a pretty overly strong statement, no?

No.

You're assuming every place and organization on the PLANET is like the one where you volunteer at. it's not.
Thanks, I would have never figured that out :D
/ is only taking off now that a large corporation is backing it and unifying how to do stuff more.
Do other camera manufacturers pull this shit? I don't think I've heard of pentax doing it.
Maybe fear of social judgement? What would you think of communicating first in a region with a group far away from your social circle ? EG if you’re asian and live in SV, silently deploy and ask people opinion in a related-field forum in the Netherlands or South Africa.

Bonus point: you expend your social circle.
Actually, it was in wasi-libc: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-libc/blob/main/libc-bott...
Recently Poland was in a similar situation. We produced too much energy from renewables. As a consequence we had to pay a few millions to other countries to take the energy. Moreover we had to compensate to individuals who have FV but their energy was not allowed to the grid. This is absolutely insane to me. Mining crypto sounds way better than this chaos. If not on country level then on individual level. I'd happily start mining myself if electricity prices were not fixed but followed the real demand.
I can read some sarcasm out of it. But, I aint surprised, too.

Wash my hands, but don't make them wet! As long it is used to target criminals, ok. But it won't.
Software R&D is a special type of capex, in principal - successful R&D execution buys recurring free cash flow in near perpetuity. Contrast this with TSMC who needs to outlay ~50 Billion every 2 years on a new Fab which will deprecate over ~6-7 years. If TSMC stopped buying fabs, then intel would beat them in ~2 years time - and TSMC would be out of business in 6-7 years.

Software R&D may be less efficient then the above math would imply, but there is a big range between perpetuity and some depreciating time horizon. R&D can also boosts growth prospects by expanding markets.
OpenAI touches a little on this on page 12 of the GPT-4 technical report (https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf). Prior to aligning to safer outputs, the model's confidence in an answer is highly correlated with that actual accuracy of the answer. After alignment though, the model's confidence in its answers is basically arbitrary and has no bearing on whether or not the answer is actually correct.
EDIT (leaving old for reference):

The reset pin "master core release" appeared with POWER9 to support BMC-less (IBM docs lingo: SPless) boot process, and depends on tying JTAG_TMS pin high to enable autostart mode (OpenPower and FSP tie that pin low and use FSI magic write to trigger SBE)

I believe the actual "go" signal is a pin separate from FSI since POWER8. Even in the BMC-less bootstrap (documented for power9 but afaik not used by anyone) you essentially need to have a bit of logic on motherboard responsible for sequencing startup and only releasing the cpu reset pins once power is stable etc.
Hand-picked to fit your agenda. No need to link the sources which disagree, right?

Also, this link selection is provided by a Russian, so the point still stands.
I don't want to be too harsh because I am guilty of the same thing. The author is fearing shipping because he doesn't have customers. He is scared of failure. If he validated and found customers beforehand, he would be excited.
I have some first hand thoughts. I think overall the quality is significantly poorer on GPT4 with plugins and bing browsing enabled. If you disable those, I am able to get the same quality as before. The outputs are dramatically different. Would love to hear what everyone else sees when they try the same.
No, it's not.

You can write code in a statically typed language that treats the data as strings. The domain modelling is optional, just choose the level of detail that you need:

1. String

2. JSON

3. MyDTO

If you do choose 3, then you can avoid serde errors using property based testing
The exponent number is the number of zeros, its way more readable and faster to interpret than counting zeros.
Their COO is a marketeer, the other two co-founders are students.
Mojo is a language that thinks it will impress the Python programmers with its ability to implement matrix multiplies directly in it. I don't think it will be that easy, but it might replace Cython.
> Just look at building a simple HTTP endpoint in C# compared to Node or even F#!

It's... basically the same? Include library, create server object, tell server object what request to handle and what to return, start server object.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/m...
Right, I'm with you. I can totally appreciate what even small compromises can open up.

My wife's laptop just got compromised a couple of weeks ago, and I've been diving down the security rabbit hole of figuring out how it happened, what's going on on my network and my computer and phones etc. It has been a rude awakening as to the sheer amount of blind trust I've been placing in all my devices. After watching what network traffic comes and goes on my laptop and how much info gets recorded by the system I've come to the conclusion that modern OSes and browsers that aren't explicitly privacy focuses are basically spyware. My new mindset is 'assume everything is compromised at all times and treat it accordingly'.