skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I honestly think it's more of a reactionary thing. Cheating is bad. That's a pretty uncontroversial statement. Whatever the criteria for "cheating", if we're all agreeing that you did it, that's bad and deserves 'correction'.

Once you're there, there's not a lot of reason to go further. "Did he cheat? Yes? Then he bad." Easy peasy, next topic of consideration. Why spend more time on something that has a simple answer?

In this scenario, the students did what would have unequivocally been a "cheat", in generations past. They looked up answers and used them to prove knowledge. That's what every person who ever failed a math test for cheating did.

So, again, even going deeper, this is cheating, plain and simple. No need to wade in any further, when you've already given the benefit of the doubt.

Of course, this not being math, and technology replacing the need for such conventions in math are both important considerations that change the context. But, you have to give it now a third thought before you even get to this point, and of course, here's where things are quite subjective. I bet people would still pretend that knowing math is important for whatever corner of life they inhabit ("I work construction and geometry makes you a pro", "gotta be able to calculate tips", "you'll get killed on contracts with tricky rates"). Most would also quickly concede that if they were just taught how to get to interfaces (apps/websites/etc) that solve those problems, that would be effective as well (even if they couldn't help adding "but knowing is faster/better/convenient/etc"). And so, not only are we dealing with subjectivity and historical bias, but now also a confirmation bias. And all of that is on top of the authority bias that a lot of people START with ("the authority said don't do it; the students did it; they should fail."

So, personally, I don't chalk up to indoctrination/conspiracy/malice anything that can be assumed to be myopia/selfishness/fear/distrust/etc. Humans are capable of the formers, but far more susceptible to the latters. That said, I'm never going to defend the US educational system, so I'm not disagree with you.
Well, I and Georgelemental.
Assign it to a group of students new to the topic... without telling them that no known solution exists.
About 500-600 items
There are aspects to hate about crypto but monero is not one of them.
It's worth mentioning Mathias Fleury work who first verified a CDCL implementation [1]. He has written follow-up stuff.

[1] https://fmv.jku.at/fleury/papers/Fleury-thesis.pdf
I read about it in a book called Chaos Monkeys.
I did try it. Only for a few minutes, but I felt it was enough to get a sense of the typography/layout.

I think my main issue was font size and lack of whitespace. I'm typically reading 10-12pt fonts in docs, code, and body content on web pages. HN by default is close to that. I think I'm therefore used to that and find it the easiest size to scan content in – I'm not reading every word I'm skimming through quickly a lot of the time.

That's also where whitespace can help. When skimming I found the page to be a mess of text with little separation. More whitespace, more contrast between different types of text, etc, could do a lot to make the page more easily readable.

One thing that I do find annoying with HN is the long text lines. I'd love to be able to wrap paragraphs at a relatively small width – this typically aids reading and comprehension, and it's why most publishing websites limit content width even on wide monitors. This could also be related to the layout issues I have with this extension – My browser window is currently ~2000x1900px, and it seems the content expands continually with no limit. Maybe there could be a limit to aid readability?

I find content much harder to read in dark mode and don't use it. It strains my eyes with the contrast and I find it harder to focus. I appreciate some people like it but I think it's a personal thing and important to have both options.
I think Bitcoin is awesome because unlike cash, digital transfers are built into the system.

Now, just like cash wasn't built with digital transfers in mind, neither was Bitcoin built with anonymity in mind, so not sure why Monero would be better/worse than Bitcoin for a thing Bitcoin was never made for in the first place.

The purpose of Bitcoin was never that all transactions were anonymous. Monero is great for this (or zCash), but it's a bit misleading to say Monero is "better" at something when what you are comparing it to, was never built for that "something" in the first place.
Might also consider https://www.getmonero.org/library/ which has links for both both Mastering Monero and the more technical "Zero to Monero" [0] where they go through the maths in detail.

Monero really is quite something. It is eye opening to realise there has never been a situation where one person could simply transfer wealth to someone else without anyone in the middle being able to say No. A powerful tool for liberty.

[0] https://www.getmonero.org/library/Zero-to-Monero-2-0-0.pdf
Monero is supposedly untraceable, or at least far harder to trace than Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other "traditional" cryptocoins. It's untraceability has made it receive even greater scrutiny and attempts to regulate it/ban it than other coins.
Some video footage of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jwz8FTAgW-M
It wouldn't be the same and that would be a GOOD thing.

Chez scheme is probably about as fast as JS JITs and with only a fraction of the time spent creating it. If you restrict continuations, you can get even better performance. On the flip side, new JS features like BigInt would have existed from the start (along with generators, rest/spread, typed arrays, let/const, etc). Features like threads that don't exist probably would exist.

On the better side, all the terrible things people complain about like hoisting, `with`, type coercion, weird prototypal inheritance, bad Java-based dates, etc simply wouldn't have happened because Scheme already specced out most of the relevant things.

HTML would have likely disappeared over time because innerHTML and string parsing would be radically less efficient than just using the macros.

We wouldn't have 10 different versions of JS because most of the new stuff either would have been baked into the first version or could be easily accomplished with macros. Major versions would be little things like adding optional type hints or

CSS wouldn't exist because you'd create sets of styles with lisp lists then pass them in. It would be a better version of CSS in JS, but done 25 years ago.

JSON wouldn't have been discovered because lists do all the things better. Likewise, there wouldn't be a need for the "lost decade" of XML development because those same scheme macros would do that job and transformer macros are far easier and better to write than XSLT.
I don’t see the difference between a service industry job and a job for a college graduate. If you work, you get paid adequately to live. I think it’s pretty simple. Colleges pump out a bunch of useless graduates that can’t find work so I don’t think you model works anymore. These service jobs for better or worse are what most college graduates are finding and there is nothing they did wrong. We shouldn’t punish people for macro conditions.
Solve it 80%
> Fairness doctrine was specifically to try and silence conservative voices.

Or maybe "conservative voices" have used lies and hatred as a political tool for decades? We've seen just how incredibly the media landscape has devolved since the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine. Far-right talking points everywhere.

Name one, just one case of "progressive voices" doing the same that comes even close to what the right wing does with people like Tucker Carlson every single day.
> Jobs advertisement ads and website getting commission if someone got hired from advertised jobs like most agency get.

If you rely on income from the same companies that are reviewed on your site it will inevitably become just as bad as glassdoor
There is an example of using this with gradient-based optimization here: https://docs.sciml.ai/SciMLSensitivity/dev/tutorials/data_pa....

As an ODE solver, you wouldn't do nanoGPT with it though, you'd need to go back to KernelAbstractions and write a nanoGPT based on that same abstraction layer. Again, this is a demonstration of the cross-GPU tools for ODEs, but for LLMs you'd need to take these tools and implement an LLM.
What they did is the literal definition of bigotry.
They rounded up as many Japanese-Americans as they could and put them in prisons under heavy guard without any cause other than other people that look like them attacked a military base.

It was objectively wrong then, and it is wrong through all of time.
Eating Disorder Helpline to Replace Human Staff with AI Chatbot
> Betelgeuse is anticipated to explode as a supernova in the next 10,000 to 100,000 years.

Too long. Speed it up.
Unlike cash, Bitcoin keeps a public log of everything you've bought though.
I don't know if GP was serious, but that's the typical human (or maybe just US) response to things like shark-attacks: kill them all.

It's awful, but I wouldn't be surprised. Even in 2023 humans are generally awful.
I suggest you take a first principle approach to Covid: calculate by yourself the probability of the epicenter to happen in Wuhan by accident. Assume every state and large organisation is not incentivized to tell the truth. (You could call this conspiracy thinking, but try it by yourself, add a very large safety factor as we can make mistakes if not expert in the matter)

For CO2 it’s similar, find people who have the opposite argument of the common narrative and see how it stack up.

The current panic assume a positive feedback, a runaway system, while it’s not impossible it’s highly unlikely. Natural phenomenon are usually self correcting or they would be in constant oscillation. One of such is the ice age/warm period where we were at the bottom of a little ice age, thus it’s normal it’s heating up again.

For Solar / Green energy look into Tony Seba he made prediction that turned out to be right about it.

The way I see it the technological development of the human race is going so fast that most problem we picture in 20, 30, 50 years will be solved way before we are there.

As an example a big CO2 producer is China and India, they are going into population collapse (as we are) and thus event without new tech you can expect their grow to plateau and then collapse in the next few years.

What concern me more than climate change is:

- totalitarian tendency of our democracies at the moment: digital currency, internet control, media capture

- Poor countries where if we raise energy price we will starve them (fertilizer, transport)

- AI / AGI we are almost there, no telling what will happen after that

- Population collapse: cultural but also chemicals in our food chain

- Pharma capture of our institution: being sick is profitable, especially if chronically

- Epidemic of mental illness: depression, anxiety, meaninglessness, bleak vision of our future of humanity
And the main way the Sentinelese prefer to interact with the rest of the world is with hails of arrows.
> If you are serious about PCB design, you need to do things manually.

this will not always be the case, you know.

I hate that this blog post is effectively an HTML commercial for the product they are selling, but I have to admit that they are headed in the right direction.

Prior to tools like KiCad, "serious" users did tapeout by hand. Prior to the transistor, "serious" electronic engineers used vacuum tubes.
Maybe it's not that they can't believe it, maybe they just can't believe that it is an inherent characteristic of government organs.

In this case it certainly seems that an overreach happened, I for one can believe that. It's certainty regarding how deep this goes that escapes me (and I think most people).
> can ethics be effectively trained into a person

Maybe. But that's not what an ethics class is for; it's for learning about ethics, it's not for learning how to be ethical.
> it’s hard to forget that your home country saw you as a threat even while a child.

And it’s the inability to forget that kept a citizenship question off the 2020 census[0], a reminder of the long lasting impact the internment still has on the US.

[0]https://www.npr.org/2018/12/26/636107892/some-japanese-ameri...
Yes. In fact, ChatGPT with Plugins behaves like an agent.

The idea behind these AutoGPTs is to give greater structure to the way the model thinks and acts, through a loop of planning, executing, and reflecting. Another goal is to provide the model with enhanced memory, similar to or identical to retrieval.

In short AutoGPT-like applications treat the LLM as a reasoning core around which a scaffolding of higher-order thinking is built.

It’s interesting, as a cognitive architecture. Imagine that your frontal cortex, responsible for planning, was very rigid and farmed out its actual reasoning tasks to your language-learning brain area.
Forefront AI: ChatGPT but Better
I really enjoyed this website, since it provides GPT-4 and a vast number of personalities that you can talk with. You can also organize your chats, create your own personas and more.
> Like at some point we have to be like DNS being a service provided by the system to apps was mostly a historical accident or an idea for a network model that never really panned out.

I think that I prefer the network model where I the system owner have control over what the programs executing on my behalf are doing on my system and my network. I really don’t want to be presented the choice of binary blob A, binary blob B or living without Internet access.

> I would have loved to see the alternate universe where your typical unprivileged app has no direct access to sockets and routes all requests through a system service that handles all the application-layer protocols and encryption.

Ditto.
ok, what are those youtube stories? honestly, i don't think i saw one.
Humans don't expire very quickly.

Most humans are going to outlast whatever they produced during their lives. If anything, human bodies are among the most durable "goods" in the economy. Only real estate, public infrastructure and recorded knowledge (including genes) last longer than a human lifetime. How many of the things you buy and own are going to outlast you?
Looks like it's using LangChain internally, you can see the prompt templates here: https://github.com/reworkd/AgentGPT/blob/main/platform/rewor...

And yeah, the initial "planning" query and the planned "tasks" are all separate GPT queries.
I don't understand. Haven't graphics cards basically been obsolete for deep learning since the first TPUs arrived on the scene in ~2016? Lots of companies are offering TPU accelerators now, and it seems like the main thing Nvidia has going for it is momentum. But that doesn't explain this kind of valuation that's hundreds of times greater than their earnings. Personally, it seems a lot like Nvidia is to 2023 what Cisco was to 2000.
This whistleblower program is discussed here [0]

I learned it does not matter what citizenship you have to participate.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkA5WP7spQ8
My experience has been that battery life is constant regardless of CPU TDP, reason being the U series CPUs (which I think Intel has since rebranded… U itself is a rebrand of Core m) are in smaller chassis so the battery is naturally smaller.

Of course… it’s asinine to put a 15W “i7” in a 15” laptop… so “anything but word processing” battery life is always ass.

These days I wouldn’t buy an x86 laptop.. ARM or bust. My M1 MacBook got like 15 hours of battery life, doing all manner of thing. The biggest inconvenience was having to remember to run Docker build to output x86 images rather than ARM since deployment target was x86.
Understanding Left-Wing Authoritarianism: Dark Triad Personality Traits
There's still a difference, the Swedish population was allowed enough liberties as to not start chopping off heads. This makes the power balance quite different. It's freedom on the terms of the powers that be, not a freedom that anyone died for, a freedom that can be reasoned about and where compromises can be made.
Funny how these sorts of people still haven't forgiven Israel for abandoning communism. Agrarian communism and the Kibbutz system have totally failed, but were mostly abandoned before this turned into a total disaster.

Of course, if the "nature of debate itself" is bourgeoisie ... and you cannot deal with this WHY would you involve yourself with it?

Oh right. She wants money.

"... there would be a even higher chance of me getting struck out of the pool. Which in the practical sense is not a decision I can make, because as a result of US monopoly capitalist exploitation, I rely in-part on judging to eat and survive bourgeois class warfare otherwise."

That's, to put it mildly, disappointing.
I took a starting position as "just" a software developer. (In fact I also took a job as bar tender too, cleaning toilets etc....) I learnt what it was like to operate in a business, gradually moved up, moved jobs, and after paying my dues eventually broke out and started my own thing.

Remember that the specifics of your PhD are probably mostly irrelevant to most commercial organisations; other than the larger ones who maybe have dedicated R&D functions... but you ruled them out.

One thing to keep in mind is that you will face pressure and stress wherever you go - it will just be of different type. Non-academic jobs come with a whole bunch of extra responsibilities which you will also likely feel are beneath you.

I occasionally long for the relative simplicity of academia and the ability to work on genuinely interesting / novel things.
Meaning is a top-down hierarchy of dependent relations, unified at its apex by intentional mind. This is the sole ontological ground of all those mental operations that a computer’s functions can reflect, but never produce. Mind cannot arise from its own contingent consequences.

This is the crux of the matter. Your mind (or mine) sits above the physical functioning of the brain. The mind is the master of the physical organism. The mind doesn't arise from the existence of the physical operations.

All of this magic attributed to computers tells me two things. First, folks aren't programmers or chip designers because those people know that exactly the same assembler code is being run in an LLM that would be run for any other software and it's not intelligent. It was all written by people and burned into the chip years ago, Turing-style, like all other computers and software.

Second, it reminds me of how our ancestors looked at geology or weather or cosmology without any real understanding of them, either, and came away with magical fairies and demons as the explanation for the natural world. Intention and consciousness were ascribed to all kinds of objects and phenomena. It was incorrect then and it's incorrect now.
If the car in front of you instantaneously goes to 0, yes.

Reminds me of driving in western Virginia, people drive insane there. This is going into Amsterdam in the morning. Highly recommend “Not Just Bikes” on YouTube if you want an interesting comparison between roads here vs. Canada/US.
Consumer ( or Crypto ) Business dropped by around 20%. While Datacenter is 15% increase. Even if both Consumer and DC were to double their Revenue, this will still be 100x P/E. And you can safely bet consumer wont double, and leaves those headroom for DC, i.e DC segment to grow by 2.5x. It will still be 100 PE.

Could they do that? Possibly. But I still think it is too much hype.
> Best part for me is the ability to use a custom editor instead of the default ones.

How does that work?
Anonymity is absolutely an integral part to digital transfers.
> what crypto allow its users to do that they would not be able to do otherwise with less resources

International money transfers, for instance. The traditional banking system was always slow and expensive, and, on top of that, countries cut each other out due to geopolitical reasons. Many third-world countries have a decent crypto adoption, you can send someone money in a matter of minutes (I do).
we need to build

Why not buy?

If the company can buy, why isn't it?

If the company can't buy, it is under-capitalized and that's a sizable problem because search is a commodity.

Anyway, the best search experience is not needing to search for the same reason that I don't enjoy searching for my car keys when I am trying to commute to work.

Good luck.
If they weren't 4 tonne sea-dwelling highly social apex predators which terrify sharks they'd probably make quite good pets.
Only if you're dealing with immature children I guess. Most people can be trusted with tools like this. Plus, I'm sure it'll be an option that the host can configure.

As others have pointed out, this article is much ado about nothing.
please elaborate where op drew false equivalencies to attack political opponents
> standard notes has some issues that put it in the "do not recommend" category for me.

Like what?
My point is that expecting time-pressed students to ignore freely available answer sheets is like expecting a hungry horse to ignore a carrot dangling in front of them.

There is nothing wrong with removing their ability to cheat, but purposefully uploading answer sheets and then getting angry that students made use of them isn't. In fact, it's not just wrong: it's ethically wrong.
Well whatever you do, don't try snacks with dolphins. The federal penalties in the US are severe.
> the problem is that DNS providers and any intermediary that can MitM have been applying content filtering at the DNS level. It can also be used to track users to an extent. DoH is necessary to reduce the set of parties who are able to see what domains you are accessing, in conjunction with ECH.

I am my DNS provider. I choose to apply content filtering.

DoH just increases the set of parties who see my traffic.
Sure, I'm happy to go into it.

Prior to 2 years ago I had been running cat5e shielded cable around the house (security cameras wanted shielded). cat5e for shorter runs apparently can do 10gig. But once I heard I'd be able to get 10gig, I started doing runs as cat6a. Significantly more expensive, but YOLO.

I got an Aruba 2500 PoE switch for ~$100, it has two 10gig SFP ports.

I have an old Dell R720 coming that I'm going to put a $75 dual 10gig card in. My plan is to hook that up to the fiber ONT, and run Proxmox or Ganeti on it, then run a VM for my firewall. Then hook that to the switch at 10gig.

Currently I don't have any interior devices that will do 10gig, so there's not much day-to-day use I'll see from it currently. When I get there, I'll probably be looking at adding a Mikrotik 10gig switch because they're relatively affordable, though maybe I'll be able to find some old enterprise gear as well. So far I haven't really seen any. The Netgear 10gig switch we have at the office seems to work fine and was ~$800 new, but is EOL, so maybe something like that will be cheap. It's only fallen over once. :-)

So the big question is why I'd go to 10gig... My primary machines are laptops, my work machine stays on my desk, so I could add one of those $300 USB-C to 10gig adapters, but probably won't. My primary personal machine is a macbook I use 100% wireless, so not really going to get any better there until I replace my Ruckus R610 with something that'll do 2.5gbps, but no plans for that anytime soon.

So the Dell could have 10gig fairly easily. Maybe I'll mirror some OpenStreetMap data or mirror media for work to cut down on our AWS costs... That could be done at 1gbps though as well.

Partly, I just want the geek cred of 10gig, partly I want to support the city fiber network through paying more for a bigger plan. Maybe I'll offer my family offsite backup, but that also probably won't need 10gig.
So governments do, some don’t, some occasionally try to do both.

where I am not only are salary ranges mandatory on job ads but company also have to publicly disclose a lot of stats wages/salaries. Median, average, quartiles etc. for all full time and part time employees.