skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
- "Tesla was both the least reliable but most popular EV brand in a survey of owners that found one in three of all EVs had major issues in the past year" [1]

- "Electric vehicles are less reliable than gas cars, according to a survey of UK drivers." [1]

- "Kia was the most reliable EV maker in the study, while Tesla was the least reliable." [1]

- "Consumer Reports Still Ranks Tesla Reliability 27th Out Of 28" [2]

- "The Model Y still has body hardware issues with the tailgate and door alignment, paint defects, and multiple other problems." [2]

[1]: https://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-least-reliable-ev-bran...

[2]: https://insideevs.com/news/549130/consumerreports-tesla-reli...
More than 90% of Calif. pot farms infected with ‘severe’ pathogen
Tesla must be getting desperate to give away a huge competitive advantage. Between this and using BYD batteries they are clearly being forced into some really uncomfortable business relationships.
It takes about 4 seconds if the plug isn't right beside the car.

It takes me at least 3 minutes one way to get to a gas station, then another few minutes to fill up.
It probably doesn’t matter. There are plenty of people who want simpler cars, but still want an electric drive train. There must be loads of us holding out for a Corolla or Camry like EV.

I don’t understand why Toyota has not produced a model like this and is doubling down on their Hybrids and hydrogen engines.
Turbos aren't very simple. The 'toyota synergy' style hybrid transaxle is a whole lot less complicated than most transaxles too. ICE cars already had an electric starter motor, so it's just adding a second electric motor and some batteries and a charging circuit.

The benefits are clear. Immense range, lower fuel consumption, longer maintenance intervals vs an ICE only, etc.
Debtors prison isn’t something people have fond memories of
Ahh, the classic babies-in-swimming-pools fallacy!
The Toyota Supra looks nice but it only holds 2 people and has no cargo capacity. Sports cars like that will always be low-volume niche products regardless of whether they're electric or not.
Wordpress is a platform or framework, HTMX is neither. If you don't like what HTMX offers for your next feature... just don't use HTMX attributes on those elements. So comparing it to WordPress, or React, etc. is not accurate.
That was implicit in my question. We aren't talking about writing purely server side web apps here, and it's reasonable to expect something like client side validation, given that this is meant to be an easy way to do full stack web apps. I think it is but not really easier than other major ones.
Samsung community support is pretty good if you stick to the flagships, it's true that you lose Knox in the process but Knox is pretty much useless in my opinion anyways.
>Translation: luxury vehicles are the future of car sales.

Not in Europe, I was surprised to read that Dacia Sandero a model designed to be cheap was the best seller this year(in Europe), they also hit record sales last year. There are lot of people that do not have the moneyor do not want to spend it on luxury. (and btw before someone points the bad safety rating of Dacia, most of the bad score is because of missing of modern active safety stuff)

https://www.romania-insider.com/dacia-sandero-best-sold-euro...
Tesla sold 1,247,146 cars in 2022. This year somewhere between 1.6M - 2.0M.

Last year BMW sold about 2.4M cars, so Tesla is quickly catching up in terms of numbers.
CCS type-1 (North America) and CCS type-2 (Europe) are NOT compatible. And China has their own standard.
Why do I continue to see people imply that React is the only way of writing frontend web applications with JavaScript? There are plenty of alternatives to React that I would say are far more "idiomatic". I highly recommend taking a look at Vue 3 or Svelte to get a better idea of what frontend JavaScript can be.
If I'm understanding you correctly, you're saying they don't need the social ceremony where everyone adds obfuscation, because there is some simple way for one user to derive the same security?

Does that not rely on us all trusting that initial user who "hashes to all zeroes" to maintain the secret? The goal here is not only to establish security but security anyone can participate in to add security, such that everyone trusts it, because anyone could have participated. Even if that's more complicated, it's more trustworthy.

Again though, I am not an expert in anything, I'm a student of computer science. I may be completely misunderstanding you and if I am, I apologize. It could be said though the social construct/contract is kind of the whole point of the decentralized protocols
> The biggest problem w gpt 4 is the cutoff date. The LLM needs to be updated regularly, the way Google initially seemed to crawl all the things and make them available to queries as they appeared.

Have you tried out Phind? It's essentially GPT-4 + internet access. It hasn't been perfect, but it's been a very useful tool for me.
They should do income garnishment like the IRS. If they don’t have income to garnish, then maybe they can’t pay the taxes at all. In that case, maybe keeping the collections in place and the garnishment in case they make money in the future and collect from their eventual estate. This is probably better than making people homeless.
The minimalist cabin is the obvious one: it's more spacious and feels much more spacious thanks to the glass roof. I did have severe doubts about the touchscreen and lack of controls, but in practice this has been a non-issue, there are tactile controls for everything you need to actually drive and voice controls for everything you don't (climate, music, etc). The glove box is just stupid though.
This made me realize I have two completely different emotional responses to criticism, even though both can be described as "upset": If I agree with the criticism, it makes me sad-upset because I let myself and others down; if I don't agree, it makes me angry-upset because someone else made a mistake (i.e. the criticism) and then tried to make that mistake my problem. (To be clear, it's the second part that triggers anger: If someone crashes their car on the side of the road, I've no reason to be angry; but if they crash their car into mine, then I do have a reason.)

I believe that both of these responses can be valuable when handled correctly, but doing so requires a different strategy for each. Actually, the first step is the same for both: make sure that you've had the correct response: if you're sad, double check the criticism really is accurate; if angry, double check the criticism really is wrong. I think perhaps a lot of trouble can be attributed not to having one of these upset responses, but to having the wrong one! A helpful side-effect of thinking about the other kind of response is that they both mediate the other: thinking about situations/new evidence in which one might respond the other way to the same criticism alleviates the original emotional response.

The next steps are more involved and specific to each response but this comment is already longer than I meant it to be :).
You can compare Tesla to Hyundai. I was leaning towards Hyundai or a Kia last month, mainly because of Tesla stigma here.

After comparing price (Hyundai/Kia 10% more) and features (lol) Tesla is easily a winner. Sure it's not for everyone, but driving traditional car feels weird now. Car without an app or phone key just feels unbelievable.
I'm glad we cleared up history and it makes perfect sense why Tesla isn't using CCS in America. You don't seem to care that it would benefit all of the bad networks in America while costing the well run one.

I'm not sure why it matters what the rest of the world does. A charging plug seems a lot less of a change than say putting the driver on a different side of the car. Bonus points, you can even use a converter between the two plugs if you take your American Tesla to Europe!
> All scooters in large cities have been electric for over a decade

A lot longer than a decade. But it depends on the city. Beijing electrified earlier (like 2004 or so), Shanghai followed, then you have smaller cities where gas was allowed for much longer.

> They had a fully electric taxi service about 7 years ago.

What city? Surely not Beijing. Maybe Shenzhen?

> Inside the city medium size trucks (for delivering merchandise to stores) are all electric.

I'm beginning to doubt you here. The delivery trikes are electric. But the small trucks that deliver merchandise to stores? Definitely not the blue trucks that are only allowed inside the 5th ring at night and cause air quality to tank after midnight.

> The international market is fragmentary and you can be arbitrarily extrajudicially curb stomped with tariffs or outright bands due to anti China hysteria

China's market is limited by their own protectionism. It is hard to tell someone to "open up" when you aren't willing to do the same yourself.
"Can you ping, Washily? One ping only, pleashe."
> I personally have my doubts that real numbers exist in any meaningful sense

I think we're in agreement here in principle. (Since we're on the topic, I'd like to add that naming this suspicious set "real" numbers is a tad bit ironic)

That said, I don't like the idea of having a group of people "owning" words as if they had a monopoly over them. The statement "the cardinality of integers is the same as real numbers" can be understood to mean "real numbers should actually be computable numbers".

I didn't bother to look up what Hotz wrote on twitter that triggered this discussion, I was just providing context that the issue of cardinality isn't as settled as some might think. It's probably not fruitful to argue whether a statement from hearsay uses words accurately or not though.
That's infuriating. There's a clear distinction between asking "how do I do this thing?" and "what do you want me to do?"

I can't read your mind, and that goes both for interview questions and determining product needs.
If you think this analogy is about frameworks vs libraries you missed the point.

It's the exact sort of technology option that is simple and accessible on the surface which is why someone inexperienced would adopt it in the early days. Then requirements naturally evolve and it gets shoehorned into ever more complex situations it was never intended for.

I'm speaking from experience and anyone who has worked in web app dev / JS for any length of time can see this coming from a mile away. The mountain of jQuery libraries alone should be enough but in the history of the internet WordPress is the classic cliché example of a simple technology that frequently gets abused beyond its original design. If your project is small and niche then obviously this critique isn't relevant. Nor is it dismissing the utility of htmx.
Tesla did not force Ford to adopt NACS. The announcement is from Ford, not Tesla. Tesla is already opening up Superchargers using Magic Dock for existing CCS-1 EVs. Ford sees the benefit of NACS and simplifying the experience for their customers to the largest charging network. Looks like a win-win to me.
Any speculation why model Y is selling better than model 3?
Given Tesla and truck hate Cybertruck is going to be ultimate. Lucky they are making it from a solid steel.
Amusing, but are you aware how many of those are referencing works before the Bible?
50% of the keycaps are Post-Consumer Recycled (PCR) integrated.
I've heard it's even worse if you want to buy an EV.

Dealerships make half their money from the service department. EV's require very little service. So they don't want to sell and EV, and it shows.

Go to a Ford dealer and try to buy a Mustang Mach-E and they'll try really hard to convince you to buy an ICE Mustang.

The worst dealership experience I ever had was when I was buying my first car back in 2003. I was 21 at the time, and I just wanted something reliable and efficient that I could carry friends in. I told sales people that it must have 4 doors, A/C, and under $10K. And one of them tries to sell me a Pontiac Sunfire convertible for $12K. I re-iterated what I was looking for. Reliable, efficient, 4-door, A/C, under $10K. He showed me an $13K Mustang. I thanked him for wasting my time and left.

Tesla makes is so damn easy. I had a similar experience as your friend. I spent 30 seconds minutes choosing the configuration (Model 3 Performance, blue, no FSD, black interior), filled out the online credit application, and a week later, picked up the car from the service center downtown. The delivery experience was just as simple. Just had to sign some final delivery paperwork and some DMV paperwork that was already printed and just needed a quick scan and signature. Less than 5 minutes, and the car was mine. I was blown away how fast it was. I literally said to the guy there, "That's it? The car is mine and I can drive away now?". I was incredulous.

Dealerships could easily make the experience this easy if they wanted, but no, they want to play games with you to fuck you over.
Before the internet I use to laugh my ass of at school friends who would wonder/debate about something but never bother to look it up, in stead they had elaborate collective "hallucinations", they imagined the facts until they were satisfied their answer was well reasoned enough, then they would consider it a fact. We all do this at times (at all ages) but one must learn to shut down the train of thought, stop polluting your memory.

I remember one from very early in life. I postulated out loud that Jerusalem, being the birth place of Jesus, must be the most peaceful place on earth. All those loving and caring religious people who work so hard to be good people. That their religions are slightly different shouldn't matter to Jesus message?

That the LLM's can consume such huge amounts of data doesn't mean they matured beyond that rather infantile mind set.

In the video you linked he explained that training it to learn to say it doesn't know will trigger false negatives.

The correct formula I imagine (hah!) is to wonder if the question is of interest to the model and to ask someone else for answers or some help figuring out the question. The human will just have to wait.

What is completely hilarious to me is that we all have heads full of learned answers for which we have no idea "why it is so" or at the very least lack that what would have one arrive at that solution. I get what Archimedes realized in the bathtub but what I want is the mechanism by which he arrived at such wild ideas. Could it be that learning a lot of facts would be the exact opposite kind of conditioning?

My mind now says this must be why we humans expire so fast. You keep the calcified brains around for a while as data storage but the focus of project humanity must be to create young ones. I will have to ponder this fact free line of reasoning some more. Perhaps I will find ways to convince myself I know something.

It is a fun thought that people created AI, we really want to believe we did. If enough pretend it is true no one can take it away from us.

If you want people to think you are intelligent you tell them things they already know and hide your sources.
HTMX + Java is almost as good as react!

I think people mistake what htmx is - they think it is a way to not write react/js in a node environment.

Where HTMX really shines is being able to bring the experience of writing React-like code without a nodejs environment in Java for e.g. (or Golang, Rust, etc)
Maybe companies should design new car models specifically to kill, that way when it happens they can truthfully claim it was exactly what it was designed to do, it would work regardless if it happens by accident or intentional as long as the buyer is not the victim, exactly like with guns.
Yeah for inference this is true, there could be a viable subset of models. You’re not going to build a viable business on inference though. It’s super cheap already and plenty of hardware can do it ootb with an existing framework as you’re saying. The $$ for selling chips is in training, and researchers trying new architectures are not going to wait for a port of their favorite model in a custom DSL or learn a new language to start prototyping now. You can port models forever, but that isn’t an ecosystem or a cuda compete. OpenCL + AMD != a from scratch company
I guess the question is if you can get any significant number of users to pay more than Mozilla would make off of ads for the same users. If you can make $1/mo off of most users and $5/mo off a smaller set of users, the smaller set doesn't have to be that big to make it worth doing financially.
Thanks, that's as good a reason as any.
Crappier, more likely.
I am indeed Swedish, but I studied at LTH >:)
What Is OAuth?
The Clean Water Act not applying to wetlands is not Alito's dumbest decision. More like tied for first place.

I volunteered for a wetlands conservation group for a decade. Only made possible by Bush 41's efforts to further codify and protect wetlands. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_net_loss_wetlands_policy

The hubris of Alito et al to judge our best available science, despite having zero expertise, despite decades of policy, despite decades of scientific and methodology advances, is just bonkers.

Oh, sorry, they're just being textualists. A totally real, consistent, and in no way purely fabricated as needed case-by-case legal doctrine.

I can't wait to humor the SCOTUS' anti-textualism tortured rationalism next time they choose originalism, major doctrines, or an entirely new legal fiction to reach their predetermined outcome.

Probably next week.
Very cool and thanks for sharing, would you say this is similar to langchains tool concept?
Is Hackernews just getting overrun by pro-Xi commentators that make up whatever they want now? Chinese air pollution is ridiculous, and it's primarily because of their massive amount of vehicle emissions:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526014/
Benchmarking this (for non-database applications) is really interesting because you get to find the crossover point, and it's usually in the hundreds of items. An algorithm that searches maximum 50 items in a hash table but does it across many hash tables could be made much faster using a linear search.

Some of his examples aren't great, though. The cost of adding an index to a database you're already using and which has a reasonably small amount of data is low, and the benefit of getting a few hundred ms less latency for your users is underappreciated. A hundred million records is definitely above the limit at which e.g. prefix search on a mobile device becomes painful.
I think the point is that electric cars the digital cameras of today.

Consumers are shifting to EVs faster than expected, and it is catching some car makers (e.g. Toyota) flat footed.
> None of this is possible with HTMX if the user has JavaScript disabled. The first step to using HTMX is to import a JavaScript file from a CDN, and none of the features for partial page replacement will work without it.

Umm, progressive enhancement is a general concept that can be applied to any stack, not just Next.js. With htmx we can just use good old anchor and form tags to fall back to full-page loads if JavaScript is disabled. In fact it makes it more obvious because usually those are the tags we're using even with htmx and JavaScript enabled.
I suspect most Americans hearing the quote he used didn’t understand it.
I am well aware of quantum error correction, but there is quite a lot about surface codes that I don't understand.

I would estimate there are about a couple of thousand people at most who can, without any other resources, make an accurate technical summary of the essential concepts in this post.

I think if people understand quantum computing a little bit, then his earlier posts are much better

https://arthurpesah.me/blog/2022-01-25-intro-qec-1/

https://arthurpesah.me/blog/2023-01-31-stabilizer-formalism-...
It does make me wonder what the converged fixed point on this technique is. If I fine tune with GPT4 to make model A, which then performs better than GPT4, then fine tune model B with A, at what point does either artifacting or diminishing returns set in?
China limits LFP batteries from not being put into cars that aren't made in China (they literally can't export them unless they are in a vehicle), and they have a distinct cost advantage even if they are heavier. Tesla is using those batteries to get the Model 3 there to $30k (which is the limit to qualify for the current subsidies in China).

It is a brilliant move by China: they have the tech, no one else seems to have it, and by not exporting it outside of completed cars, they can get an advantage.
I’ve been waiting 10 years for this, gave up a while ago.

Nobody wants to sell electric cars for cheap, why throw away the margins you can get by selling them for more?

I don’t see a great opportunity for them to lower costs more on a cheaper model. Tesla already went through the exercise of making the cheaper version and people are paying premium prices for it anyway.
Microsoft to Add Native RGB Lighting Control to Windows 11
I will choose what pays the most.

That way i can buy time in the future to work on what i enjoy or find meaningful. At least that's how i think about it lately.
Who sold the most horses in 1908?
> Because Mozilla and its execs were asleep at the wheel while Google started to eat its share

I mean... it was probably that too, but Google abusing its search monopoly to market Chrome probably played a major role as well. Or if you like - Mozilla's mistakes are such that Google probably could have won fair, but that's not what actually happened.
https://baseline.is/tools/background-remover/

Is free and works fine for my needs.
Good luck beating free.
I'm referring to the article, not a feature of a product. I consider profiting off of green-washing while simultaneously being one of the biggest contributors to pollution and then silently reneging on your carbon emissions target a "corporate misdeed". I think that all of the companies that set these public carbon emissions goals as PR should be held fully accountable for missing them.
> They allow donations too. Nothing has stopped anybody from paying. All you had to do was go pay. Pick some amount. Even five fucking dollars.

They literally do not allow donations to Firefox. It is not, and never has been, possible.
Tesla Roadsters that don’t even work are about to sell for almost $1M
“Tesla not only beat all US luxury automakers on car sales for 2022 as a whole, but also beat them by a ridiculous margin. BMW was the former champ, and while its sales dropped by over 5% year over year, Tesla's sales grew by more than a whopping 40%.”

https://insideevs.com/news/652873/tesla-tops-bmw-us-luxury-c...

If you’re pummeling Toyota with a luxy model, the rest are just fluff.
> And how did they achieve such a milestone? You guessed it, by using the surface code to protect their qubits!

In all sincerity, I did not guess it.
You can use the aws_appautoscaling_scheduled_action terraform resource to create a scheduled scaling policy action to mimic a scheduled Fargate container fire-up, e.g. from zero Fargate container instances to one or however many are required, and then back down to zero.
Then you need to explain it better.

There is nothing wrong with offering simple solutions.

The problem with WordPress is that you can't just stop using it and painlessly swap to a more powerful framework/platform. You can really dig yourself into a hole.

This doesn't apply to HTMX.
The eGMP platform options from Hyundai (Hyundia Ioniq 5 and 6, Kia EV6, Genesis GV60) were also built in a dedicated manner.

While I have an EV6 (and my wife an ID.4), if I was on the market now, there's a ton of low-mileage Model 3 and Y out there, and the prices have come down significantly.
A very rich person...
We inherited our entire legal tradition from English common law, so an appeal to precedent from back then isn’t totally outlandish.
It was a reasonable request - I'd stated they weren't ABI compatible but not said why that was the case.
Interesting. But the doc doesn't go as far as to say it's faster, just fast - any measurements for eg string keys?