skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Tesla can probably make more profit long term from selling energy than their cars. Otherwise they would DRM the charger network (easy to do since their vehicles are internet-connected)
For a fast charge I see from $0.20 to $0.35 usually. I don't usually do a full charge, maybe 60% or so, so like $15 to $20.
People forgot about flattening the curve because we literally did flatten the curve. It was about hospital capacity:

https://www.michiganmedicine.org/health-lab/flattening-curve...
Complete mistake by Tesla. The superchargers in some areas are already clogged up, if there's a long line to charge it is getting rid of the one market differentiator that Tesla has that most companies wouldn't invest in. The supercharger network is one of the reasons why I stayed with Tesla instead of getting the BMW i4.
Claims made in a leaked blog post shouldn't be considered as having any sort of scientific authority. That whole "no moat" piece has exactly the tone I would expect from an over-confident Googler who has essentially been following all of this by watching various Discord channels and browsing hacker news. That isn't how science is done. It shouldn't be how business is done, but people seem to really enjoy these everything-is-actually-simple narratives.
Why petrol has one interface similar for all cars and electricity has same interface for all buildings but somehow car charging became many different interfaces? They should standardise it the same way they did for charging cables in Europe.
Florida bill protects SpaceX, other space companies from accident liability
The Supreme Court has simply required the small governments to come up with a long list of exorbitant fees that will now be assessed on all tax forfeitures.

+15k tax due, plus penalties
+5k in administrative fees related to the seizure
+5k in administrative fees related to the sale
+5k in accounting and administrative fees for the processing of the return of excess value
+10k service fee
+10k convenience fee

Now she still owes them 10k…
Send an email to your supervisor asking them to approve a reimbursement request for couriering the work laptop to the company after getting an estimate from the courier. Ask them if they are also paying for insurance for the contents of the package in transit (in case it is lost or damaged during transit). If they say no, get it in writing.

Send the package. Include the laptop and all the accessories provided by the company (cables, mouse etc.,)

Send the actual reimbursement request along with the pre-approval including proof-of-delivery from the courier.

Save copies of all the communications, and verify that you were reimbursed in full and paid all outstanding wages.

This should work everywhere around the globe (with reasonable companies). If not, go to a lawyer with the copy of the communications you saved.
I think one big up with this html-centered approach is you don't have to worry about SSR
In the Bay Area, during most daylight hours its around $0.50/kWh, but I've seen it at 0.60 sometimes.
Second Harvest is a very, very unfortunate name for those familiar with the habits of the Karankawas.
Not radicals but reformers.

Radicals want to throw out everything, not just the particular thing under consideration.
Charging at home is typically cheaper. Around 1/2 to 1/3 of the cost of a public charger. There are also some free public chargers but they are typically slower charge around 6kW and are limited to an hour or 2.
depends on time of day and local electricity rates. most of your charging will be at home which is much cheaper than supercharges.

>In general, the cost of charging a Tesla is more than 3 times cheaper per mile than the cost of fueling a gas-powered car (4.56 cents per mile compared to approximately 13.73 cents per mile for gas vehicles).
from: https://news.energysage.com/tesla-charging-cost-vs-gas/

a different take:
>It depends on what you are comparing it to gas wise. In my area, approximate numbers are 11 cents a kWh at home, 28 cent at a SC. I will get roughly 3 miles to the kWh so a mile costs me 9 cents if I SC. Gas is $3.30 a gallon so my car would need to get 36 miles to the gallon or better to compete with SC'ing.

from: https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaModel3/comments/stbpfb/comment...
"Climate propaganda" is any statement that places environment, life, or literally anything else above the idea that our filthy rich overlords desperately need more money even if it kills us all. More money for the filthy rich is the only thing that matters in the entire Universe. If you believe otherwise, you're a filthy heathen heretic hippie tree hugger.
Its a shame that this does not have Blazor components.
Most DC fast charging rates are about 2x to 3x the local electric rate per kWh, though stations vary quite a bit based on other factors. Here in Colorado, my home power is about $0.125/kWh "normal" rate putting supercharger rates at $0.25 to $0.50/kWh. If I charge my Model 3 Midrange battery (62kWh) capacity from 10 to 80% (typical road trip percentages to minimize charge time) that would be somewhere between $10-15.

95% of the time I'm charging at home and on a net-metering Solar plan, so really only paying those $0.12/kWh rates in the dark winter months, basically charging for "free" off solar once we hit the equinox.
HTML already has a native validation API for form elements. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/Forms/Form_va... HTMX wraps that with some custom events and enables you to use the same API for non-form elements.

In the example above, if you need custom validation logic, you could handle the HTMX:validation:validate event with any normal JS event handler.

Of course, it's up to you to decide how much effort to put into client-side validation that can be easily bypassed.
I've had a similar theory for a long time, admittedly based on basically absolutely nothing. Looking back at history, say WWII, what would have happened if the Axis had won? History is written by the victors, as they say. I have to imagine that things would be perceived differently today, had that happened. Something along the lines of the Heroic Axis defeating the Evil Allies. Having observed the way Homo Sapiens often behave, I've long wondered if we were the Axis, and the Neanderthals the Allies, so to speak.
They didn’t WANT to do this, your government has overreached and forced a private company to do this.
most of the examples don't have any hyperscript in them

htmx generalizes HTML as a hypermedia, making any element a hypermedia control that can issue any type of HTTP request in response to any event and target any element in the DOM for replacement

that's the concept, improve HTML, and it gives you quite a bit more than plain HTML, but it is intentionally constrained to not go beyond that

for things beyond what that gives you, I am not afraid to recommend scripting: Fielding explicitly included scripting as an optional constraint his description of the REST-ful architecture of the web

A good example of how we like to see scripting used w/ a hypermedia system is the Sortable.js demo, which shows htmx integrating w/ Sortable.js via events, the cleanest way to integrate hypermedia controls w/ client side scripting:

https://htmx.org/examples/sortable/

we have a chapter on client-side scripting in hypermedia systems here:

https://hypermedia.systems/book/client-side-scripting/
If only we had a city council and state government that cared about the environment and priorities public transport…
No, they enticed Tesla with some sort of tax benefits or something. They weren't forced.
Does this cause problems for web crawlers indexing sites, since these are not typical js event listeners etc? Even though they must use them in the background, there is an abstraction the crawler must be able to navigate. I had an entire site de-indexed for getting too fancy once, so I worry about this type of thing perpetually now.
The situation is even worse as the cable length on the supercharger and the port placement on non Tesla evs means every non Tesla blocks 2 chargers.

Hopefully something ford sorts out when they embed the port in 2025.
Is the typo (learming) intentional? If so this is brilliant sarcasm.
Tell that to John Bull.
NVDA is the new TSLA, regardless of how their business doing great
Imagine the GoT producers used GRRM's books without licensing and then claim copyright on the series.

Does OpenAI have the rights on all the texts they used to train their GPTs?
"I was once in an interview (which I failed)"

You didn't fail that interview. They did.
We need a standard, but why CCS and not the Tesla one? One of those plugs has a network of great chargers, the other does not.
> Complete mistake by Tesla.

Another way to spell "fuck the people, why should their life get better ?"

Half joking aside, supercharger usage might save Tesla if their vehicles stop selling well enough a few years down the road. People's taste come and go, infra will always be needed.
The ultimate indictment here is that Microsoft yielded the UI decisions for the one decisive creative advantage which they have, stylus computing, to Google so as to dumb down styluses to the lowest common denominator of Android styluses.

Why does my digital stylus function as an 11th touch input and scroll since Fall Creator Update?

I handed a stylus to a sales associate at Best Buy and challenged them to select text on a Windows 11 computer and they were unable to do so --- but were instantly successful on my Samsung Galaxy Book 12 running Windows build 1703 which allows this to function as it has since Windows for Pen Computing (and Go Corp.'s PenPoint before that).

I'd give my interest in Hell for someone to make a nice stylus computer running Linux, or for Apple to make a Mac which has touch and support for the Apple Pencil.
I wish this existed when I was trying to look at 20G of firebase database JSON dump.
Bloomberg Terminal, 1982
That counts as cruel and unusual.
In Europe you can go ahead and charge your BMW i4 on a Tesla charger. Europe wisely set a common charging standard:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y33AArvMUQ

Incompatible charging infrastructure is a profoundly stupid outcome. All brands of charger must charge all brands of EVs.

It's a mistake to support closed infrastructure. Demand more and better.
Yes. You can.

Companies are not that important.

The ethical decision making here is completely revolving around ones speculative beliefs.

If you truly believe this will have a sufficiently meaningful impact, then you should be willing to torpedo this company, no matter who you are.

What qualifies as sufficiently meaningful is up to us.
Metrical trap (Cold War spy method)
I’m personally pissed at this news, Tesla long ago offered to share their charging port spec with other car manufacturers, and they all told them to pound sand. Nearly a decade later, Congress literally forces Tesla to open up their network because it’s so superior to the competition.

If a Ford F150e takes up two hours charging in a stall that’s designed to charge a Tesla in 15 minutes, there’s gonna be huge delays in certain areas.
> has many serious failures such as how long their truck has slipped.

i wouldn't call the cybertruck a true failure, since it's effectively free marketing, and they don't have a real obligation to make a sale.

Tesla's massive competitive moat is their battery making capacity. I do not believe the incumbent car manufacturers are able to catch up any time soon.

It would be the chinese manufacturers of electric cars that pose the biggest threat to tesla, not the US/western incumbents.
“In 2025, Ford will offer next-generation electric vehicles with the North American Charging Standard (NACS) connector built-in, eliminating the need for an adapter to access Tesla Superchargers”

That’s massive that another automaker is adding the Tesla connector.
I’d rather Tesla add the CCS connector, but it will be interesting if Tesla uses their charger network access to push other automakers to add the Tesla connector.
They had 15 years to figure this out in a way that wouldn't torpedo their company. I think they deserve a good torpedoing at this point.
I personally don't see the utility in this too much, but then I'm old fashioned and go out of my way to use as little JS as possible, doing everything via CSS as much as I can.

Even though JS is ubiquitous and small, well written JS is harmless, I still try to avoid it like the plague. Maybe just to somewhat fight back against all the excessive JS that plagues every site.
Because I'm not a computer. I'm a human.
Level 2 AC charging probably. Level 3 DC 100KW+ fast charging probably not. Fast charging requires quite a bit of high power electronics to convert that grid power into DC. That's why for Tesla Superchargers, the real guts are in big cabinets off to the side.
Is there much investment required to set up a charging station? There is a requirement of be HV capacity sure, but it would seem some transformers and power electronics is not as expensive as burying fuel tanks underground.
They literally threatened Musk if he didn’t eventually settle a deal.
Wasn't the issue with the Iceweasel UA purely on Debian's end, them not like or agreeing to the Firefox terms? I don't think most forks would have that issue
The article did mention a concurring opinion that suggests how this would be viewed:

“Economic penalties imposed to deter willful noncompliance with the law are fines by any other name,” he wrote. “And the Constitution has something to say about them: They cannot be excessive.”
Congress didn’t compel this. They passed tax incentives to make it desirable.
Absolutely. Eventually we'll have magnetic chargers under every parking space.
Not to diminish the point you're making in any way but I thought you could donate directly to Thunderbird development. Did this change?
It's not that I avoid JavaScript, it's that I want my work to be accessible to someone without JS as a requirement, for whatever reason they may be in that state and configuration, whether by choice or not.

I write plenty of JS (12% of my biggest project, according to GitHub), but it's added onto HTML in such a way that the HTML still works for:

* a security-minded person who has it turned off in their browser,

* a user of a browser without JS support, such as Links, Lynx, w3m, Dillo,

* someone with an older device using NoScript for performance reasons,

* someone with a slow network connection who can't load the included library,

* a server operator who chooses to disable JS rendering/injection and serve plan HTML, such as the website for a Bitcoin conference,

* another scenario I haven't even thought of or imagined yet.

My conscience as a developer and enabler of information access just does not allow me to write off all these people as undeserving of accessing my websites. You may feel differently, and I think that is OK, too...
I haven’t, but a few searches seem to reinforce my point. What am I missing from afar?
The amounts in this case were already excessive. As the Court's opinion notes, Taylor only owed about $2300 in unpaid taxes, but $13,000 in interest and penalties. Excuse me? When the interest and penalties are more than five times the base amount, something is amiss.
The same can be said of a React frontend that talks to a JSON API. There is some structure, organization, and convention to the API endpoints, one-way data flow, and so on. Otherwise it’s chaos.

On our most recent project we do the same with Django and HTMX. Organized endpoints by component. Composable, reusable server-side components with django-components [1]. And we’ve been orders of magnitude more productive, shipping more in 1-2 months than we did the previous 12-18 months working with React.

[1] https://github.com/EmilStenstrom/django-components
I haven't read too closely, but no one is building meaningfully affordable housing in Atherton. Each unit in the development would easily sell for millions.

CA/the bay area should focus on packing high density housing closer to transit lines, not lifting apartments in areas that are an hour+ walk from transit to score political points.
We know the brain is doing information processing. Our senses are just streams of information mapped to our nerve signals. Our brain is constructing our environment, our memories, and our inner feelings. Damaging certain areas of the brain interrupts the information processing and predictably impairs specific functions associated with that area.

While we don't know the specific set of functions that form the basis of intelligence, we know there is information processing going on and therefore intelligence is computable. We don't know exactly the abstraction level at which neurons are forming this theoretical Turing Machine, however unless there are any reasons to think the brain is doing more than just information processing, we can conclude that machines will also be intelligent.

Then there is the definition of intelligence which I think lacks precision. There are many definitions but to continue with the provided definition, for example, "thought" and "reason" are not precise and is presuming a biological entity as the only ones having the capacity to be intelligent. Either we make that an explicit condition, meaning the definition of intelligence is something that biological brains do, or we define it such that it can apply to anything even non-living entities. If we do the latter, I think large GPT models are approaching a form of intelligence. The Turing Test is soon to be surpassed with large GPT models, where most people will not be able to tell the difference, and at that point we will have to admit that it's at least a certain type of intelligence, although perhaps not human.
I doubt this would be practical taking into account how strong magnetic field has to be.. I am wondering... am I missing something or nobody seriously thought about it?
Ah yes. Better watch out. Anyone who uses a Biblical phrase like that might be dastardly "wolf in sheep's clothing" with ulterior motives and not simply "the salt of the earth."

Besides, are you sure you've never used such a phrase without thinking about it? "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." I'm sure you'd much rather "do unto others as you would have them do unto you". So maybe just be a charitable "Good Samaritan" and "turn the other cheek", even if you don't really like it, then. After all, "an eye for an eye" policy is fairly unpleasant.

Oh, who am I kidding? I'm just "casting pearls before swine" with this audience. (And being as foolish as "the prodigal son", at that.) I can see that "the writing is on the wall," and I won't get anywhere with anyone on this topic. I'll probably even get downvoted for this, but oh well. "Sow the wind" and "reap the whirlwind" as they say. (Hacker News really can be "the blind leading the blind" sometimes.)
> if you simply use the equivalent of basic (single-decree) paxos per key, the writes can be leaderless

Is there any writes acknowledgements in what you describe when replication factor > 1?

How do you ensure that I always read the last written value to the same key?
I like that the Tesla connector is smaller than J1772 or CCS. Since DC fast charging is still a pretty new technology, if companies were required to defer to a standard we would still have giant CHAdeMO connectors.

I don't think we should be surprised that the company that brought us "Autopilot" chose to market its proprietary connector as the "North American Charging Standard". Marketing-wise, I think the name is pretty good, though it is cringe-worthy revisionist doublespeak.
> Institutionalist axis

That's an interesting take. I'm guessing the divisions are Bush appointees are institutionalists, Democrat appointees are partisans, Trump appointees are partisans?
Transcript and Video: Claire Hughes Johnson Fireside Chat on Scaling People
I would like the big players to argue that they have some right to the numbers as it has important applications to BitTorrent and cryptography too for that matter.
New work helps to explain how chronic stress can inflame the gut
> if the new remedies can be applied to the "legal" implementations that were in effect before the closing of the loopholes, I suspect that it would make the "loopholer" a wee bit more cautious.

and there's moral implications about applying new rules retroactively. What you do today that is completely legal, should not be punished tomorrow even if it was decided in the future that it is illegal. Otherwise, there would be a chilling effect on innovation.
From the whales' point of view, if it is silent it would be great if every boat had it.

1. https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/news/2022/july/underwater-noi...

2. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/apr/12/ocean-of...

3. Woods Hole, 2005: https://www.whoi.edu/oceanus/feature/how-to-see-what-whales-...
> I didn't say we are all going to die.

But you said:

> The ideology of wanting humans to not send themselves to extinction

It seems pretty clear you are implying we will literally go extinct because of global warming. This is crazy.
Presumably the memory footprint is often far less too.
> He argued that Hennepin County’s position was supported by the Statute of Gloucester of 1278, which gave feudal lords in England the ability to recover their land from tenants. Justice Neil Gorsuch told him, “I just don’t understand what on earth any of that history has to do with this case.”

Since I just got done reading this:

https://www.amazon.com/Foundation-History-England-Earliest-B...

I was highly amused. The basis of English common law was, indeed, being laid back then, and it probably won't surprise you to know that landless peasants had very few rights.
let's say that you have an upvote button

<button hx-post="/upvote"
hx-trigger="click"
hx-target="#notification-bar"
hx-swap="outerHTML"
>
Upvote
</button>

Well where is this notification-bar? It could be anywhere on the page. Maybe it was introduced by another htmx action from another endpoint. Answering this simple question could take a lot of work. There is no way to work it out systematically short of auditing every interaction on the page.
This is a nice tool, especially because nowadays I'm surprised by how many people don't seem to know what a debugger is...
The way you get performance on modern processors is to use libraries that use the cache effectively for the stuff that actually eats CPU.

High level languages are good at enabling high level optimizations like caching and special case handling of things, which might be a bigger gain than anything to do with memory layouts except in a few inner loops.

High performance and reasonably focused low complexity stuff might be a good fit for C, until compilers get even better.

But in a web browser? I guess time will tell, but my guess is the ability to more effectively manage complexity will let people do more high level optimizations with less fear of buffer overflows from more code.

Things like "In this specific case I can fall back to this very simple plaintext rendering for this one section" might save more CPU than "We made all rendering a bit faster" especially if you just keep doing the performance critical stuff in C.
I'm usually anti-regulation and very pro-capitalism, but the feedback loop has to work correctly. Positive feedback for positive things, negative feedback for negative. If the system goes off the rails, such as monopolies in capitalism's case and vehicle size arms race in the US, then yes regulation is needed. Speed limits are fine. Another alternative to regulation is for the US to change it's city planning polices.
I mean if the company market cap is skyrocketing and they're making money hand over fist, I think you can read any pledge as "we pledge to do this thing as long as the money continues to pour in at the current rate or better."

Whenever revenue starts contracting, all the old promises are basically empty words.
The fact that I struggled with navigation and spent time trying to find non-existing content on the “What’s new?” page tells a lot about quality of this design system. If its own website that is supposed to be a showcase of it has discoverability issues, shouldn’t we expect these problems to exist in products that adopted it?