skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't want to make this distinction. I was just objecting to misusing the "colour of your bits" essay to try and support ideas that have absolutely nothing to do with what the essay is about.

Here, as you say, a cake is a cake, and an intelligence is an intelligence, regardless of how it came to be. We can revisit the relevance of causal history once we reach the point we can assemble organisms from from cells, and/or create cells out of dead matter - at which point the only difference between "born" and "made" will be the Colour of its cells.
> All Americans have a right to K-12 education

Federally, no, they don’t.

They may have a State Constitutional right, though.
I think the man pages in FreeBSD cross a critical threshold where they actually are enough to learn the bulk of most things and seem to be generally much more useful than at least what my personal experience with Linux is. I will admit to a general bias towards thinking FreeBSD is generally of much higher quality than Linux in general, so take this with a grain of salt.
If you are improving every day, look back at your work from 5 years ago and how it isn’t your best and didn’t define you to improve to today.

In sums ways you’d hope todays work wasn’t don’t improving or you would end up having pages.

Criticism is that if it’s not improved upon.

The operation who gets to learn, grow and improve is the winter compared to the person pointing it out.
Sometimes it helps to give it the silent treatment. Let it ask 3 times, don't wear out your voice or raise your diastolic, and then maybe you're transferred to an intelligent prison inmate.
Practice! Also group crits. While the format differs from place to place, in art / CGI / illustration / animation a crit (critique) is a session where everybody lines up their work and then you go around the room and each person critiques each others work, saying what you like about it, what you dislike, what you would change etc., while the person being critiqued takes on board or pushes back against the criticisms. Because you're taking it in turns to critique and be critiqued, and are doing it in person, there's social pressure to be polite and constructive, however it is still very uncomfortable to begin with. But do it every week for a few years and you end up with a very thick skin. You can take lessons from the process into other areas of your life and even introduce something parallel when developing where you do group code reviews.
The onedrive app on Android has a "camera backup" functionality.

It saves images and videos from any folder to the onedrive cloud.

I've configured it, and then I sync the onedrive to a Synology Nas at home.
No, thats just wrong. "What I say is always relevant to you, no matter what you do" seems to be a new game in society, but that doesn't make it any more true. If I don't talk about politics, then my position is "I am totally unable to change anything, so I keep my mouth shut and save the energy for something positive."
Because denying a group of people (say, based on ethnicity or skin color) the right to exist is equivalent to hating them.
What a beautiful design!
But these are not necessarily visible for the end-user and guess what, this is what an end-user notices, not if the service is using some of the new state-of-the-art encryption.
It's usually not personal - having a professional detachment helps.

Remember the only way from amateur to professional is by constant improvement, which requires constant critique of your performance.

As you improve the criticism becomes less, you also have to rise above the amateurs who don't know how to adequately structure criticism, so that it written in a less personal way.
Early on in your career this may seem deliberate and you will make a lot of mistakes, but it does fade.

You should also have 2 tenets:

- It doesn't matter what happens, you are paid for the code regardless, so don't hold so much pride.

- Make sure your reviews of others hold them to the same standard and language so they feel what feedback like that does and helps them adapt (it's also revenge served cold if that's your thing).
I think you misunderstand Moore's law.
So, how do you play this if you're on an iPad or other mobile device, and you can't use a keyboard?
In a lot of interactions, the person giving feedback is just doing their job.

I’ve been a team lead and CTO, and when I was presented with some strategy or deliverable, it was my responsibility from that side of the table to speak from experience and point out banana skins and improvements.

There is really nothing personal at all in these interactions, it was just trying to deliver a better product as a team.

If you are putting forward bad work, or I am giving poor advice then the business has a performance management problem, but the to and fro of feedback is just a normal part of teamwork.
How is that different from `while !`?
That is simple.

Any left-wing should be allowed, any right-wing stuff should be denied.

Few exceptions exist on the western side, Spain is probably the most remarkable case. Reason why you wouldn't often hear much about what happens there, unless it is something negative to bash the right-wing people there.
Why does the bird look so angry?

I think a more balanced approach to the positioning of the eye might look better. It looks much less angry in the Android Adaptive version.
PUC RIO keeps winning. Among other victories is the language Lua.
Let's talk about the certifications epidemic
A politician in the Netherlands got a crowd chanting "Do you want more or fewer Moroccans?" "Fewer! Fewer! Fewer!" [0].

A court found him guilty for "groepsbelediging", insulting a part of society, which is a crime. He did not get a punishment.

That's the only example that comes to my mind of something that the courts found not allowed in the Netherlands.

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaB75uznT8o
That's very cool. A lot of work to encode a long ssh key.
I mean... Nobody likes having their mistakes or imperfections pointed out, and it feels worse online, where expressing empathy is harder than in person. It's ok to feel bad.

Remind yourself that their feedback, whether it's warranted or not, is just a part of the process of finding the fit within a team. Over time you'll develop a relationship together and find common ground. Try to develop trust in each other, adapt to each other. That will make it feel less bad, and help you write code in a way that your team mates appreciate (even if it's not your preferred way).
Did we listen to the same talk? It was barely coherent.
I wanted to preorder the updated 13 inch model but it turned out that in EU Framework sells their products only in a selected few countries (also they are actively preventing people from using forwarding services so there's no good way to sidestep this). It would be great if they had a distributor somewhere in the EU or something that could resell their products otherwise it might be a very long wait till they're available where I'm at.
This reminds me of the time I got banned from a karaoke bar for singing Danger Zone too often. They said I exceeded the maximum number of Loggins attempts.
Off topic, but I’ve noticed Vice pumping out a lot more content since they…uh…went bankrupt
Lots of internet recipes to add baking soda to each cup of coffee or even your batch of coffee powder, to improve both taste and acidity.
Hey thanks for the kind words! About the "tabbing" behavior; I know Sync for Reddit on tablets introduced a version of this a while back but as you say getting the UX of this correct on phones is very challenging but it is an interesting design challenge.

I get automatic reports on crashes and about 99% of them are WebView crashed in native code. I've Googled this a bit and am under the impression that these are unavoidable but I definitiely do not understand it. My impression is that they are due to bad performance but it is unclear if anything can be done from the app side to mitigate the issue.

The actual Java crashes (i.e. crashes in the Harmonic code) are relatively few according to the console data I have and mostly non-deterministic but if you have a crash you can replicate I'd appreciate if you can describe it so I can see if I can get the same behavior on my side.
dubliners
One of the best science writers ever. I've laughed at every one of his articles.
A related quote from the same pilot on how fast the SR-71 could fly: “There really isn’t one number to give, as the jet would always give you a little more speed if you wanted it to.”

https://www.thesr71blackbird.com/Aircraft/Stories/sr-71-blac...
You need a centralized identity system for a multi-app business
It may be the case that you’re ambushed by critical reactions. Prime yourself before reading comments, get your guards up a little. This puts some distance between you and the comment(er). Your skin may still be hit, but not your soul.

Secondly, if somebody says something that you dont agree with but is not really important or interesting, or even snarky, don’t respond. Just ignore it. Respond to another comment (if present) thay you do find constructive and interesting. This is very powerful because you actually respond to the snarky comments without responding. This can sometimes be the loudest and best response. Don’t waste energy where there is no gain.

It helps. Remember also that finding flaws is a lot easier than creating things, especially if new ideas are involved. Also remember that love makes blind; it’s easy to fall in love with one’s own ideas/solutions and so ignoring its shortcomings. The easiest to fool is yourself. But that’s fine if you allow yourself to adjust.

Finally, allow yourself to be convinced. If somebody has a good argument against your case, give them a little credit. Try to have a conversation and not a debate.
Free speech does not equate to unlimited absolution from consequence
> First, every court of appeal can strike down a law as unconstitutional.

Any federal court, not just the courts of appeal.
When I was sick with a condition whose symptoms precluded me from being aware that I was sick, I yet had a vague awareness that something was wrong. I ended up talking to an academic adviser at my university, who had the insight to transfer me to the university's general practitioner, who had the insight to transfer me to an excellent specialized treatment program. I am now fully recovered. I was very lucky: if I had called 911, I would likely have been placed on a railroad to a much worse place.
This sounds and looks impressive but is this actually anything more than a brain machine interface for a stable diffusion like model using an MRI?

If so what it generates and reconstructs is based on the data the model was trained upon not what the individual has actually seen. So this only provides a thematic prompt at best and the rest is just a hallucination.

There is no extraction of actual visual memories from the individual.

I really hope that this won’t going to go any further it can be 1000 times worse than bite analysis if this ever spills into forensic science.
Oh I see, yeah on Android 9 you are getting a fallback color for when automatic theming is not available. I would recommend using the regular light theme as this has a green accent which I think is nicer on the eyes. I'll add a note to change to light material you fallback color because that does not look nice.
My point is that you know the real source of the error, so there's no point for these terse messages. The example in the article, you know at point of conversion that you get a float, but instead you need to do a dance to get the original. Here it's a divide by zero - you can tell me the name of the variable too.

There's no need to repeat the infamous MSSQL "String or binary data would be truncated" message saga here - there's no reason you can't give much more verbose errors by default.
No, I am definitely not German, actually, proud not to be.
If somebody tells me "you are wrong" i take it personally. If they tell me "this looks wrong" and explains why, they are not criticising me but my work, which might truly have been wrong.
It's the difference between "you" and "it" being wrong, where only one of those is objective.

Another nice example:

"I'm so sorry, but this looks stupid"

Vs.

"I'm so sorry, but you're being stupid"
Any pictures from my phone get synced to:

- iCloud Drive

- OneDrive

- Google Photos - I still haven’t gone over the 15GB free space since Google instituted the limit. But I’ll pay for extra storage when needed.

- Amazon Drive - free with Prime

My videos get synced to everything but Amazon Drive.
A government constitution should be designed to be robust. It should be assumed that no rights will be removed under any possible circumstances.

The inclusion of positive rights simply reduces the space of possible circumstances the government can traverse without removing rights, and depending on what sort of positive right we are taking about it does so drastically. Giving the government the ability to remove rights is dangerous for obvious reasons (they aren’t really rights at that point, are they).

If the medical system is ever mismanaged to the point of insolvency, should the government have the ability to violate a constitutional right to get things back in order? If they are allowed to violate that right, presumably they are able to violate other “rights” in the same class depending on the circumstances as well.

No one is saying constitutions with positive rights are totalitarian. I am just saying that they are fragile and should be avoided for that reason.

If what you want is a government health care system that can be modified or canceled based on circumstances, then that’s fine, but you can’t call it a “right” since you aren’t treating it as one.
A few situations I have encountered:

1. Sufficiently obscure technical details in some field of research. There are several high-quality sources, but each of them uses its own terminology with subtly different definitions. Many immediate consequences are also left unsaid, because you can't say everything if you want to keep the paper readable. Anyone with sufficient background should see them anyway.

2. Word etymologies. There are often many competing explanations with varying degrees of plausibility and popularity, and many sources with varying degrees of credibility. The things the LLM hallucinates are often quite interesting.

3. Questions with well-defined answers that are overshadowed by something far more popular. Like, for example, what did Caesar do on the night before crossing Rubicon.
Nope, the R. base likes fighting too much.
I read the article more as: take the leap, but recognise when to step back reassess.
What's the lowest rate you can do in-app purchases at in an app clip? And to put it in perspective with tips, how much of that goes to poor, underpaid Apple employees and how much goes to shareholders?
I don't think you could have communicated your message less clearly in the original post.
Assuming you have 24GB of VRAM, then you should be able to run something like 7 billion parameters i.e. MPT-7b and quantized perhaps you can get up to 13 billion.

Note: I have no practical experience of this, just reading around.
There’s a kind of bathtub curve between generalism and specialism.

On the far left you have master generalists with incredible breadth of understanding and the ability to summarize and strategize. These people are highly valued and often land in architecture or leadership roles.

Then in the middle you have the specialists. The Java developers and the Ops people. They’re less valuable because there are so many of them, and they’re somewhat interchangeable.

But then on the far right you’ve got super-specialists. They are masters of their niche - world-class experts with deep understanding who are sought after as the authority in their domain. These folk are super-valuable too.

AI will probably eat the ones in the middle first.
> https://man.netbsd.org/find.1

"find -- walk a file hierarchy"

what an idiotic summary
Tesla – early Investor Presentation (2010)
US regional banks swap $220B in deposits to soothe FDIC insurance nerves
The problem with all the other bounds checked languages is that they aren't binary compatible with existing C :D

More seriously, the core issue is that [Obj-]C[++] conflates a pointer to an object (in the memory sense) with a pointer to an array of many of those objects. As a result they have to transfer counts/sizes independently, null terminate, or be hopeful, etc. Sensible languages chose to actually distinguish address of object from array of object, and as a result they can have a different structure. Technically C++ does this (new T[...] gives you a pointer to memory that has a preceding count) but because it interoperates with C transparently you don't know if a given T* is a C array (no length), a C++ array (has a length), or an individual object (no length). On the plus side that means you can pass a tuple of "address of a local variable" and '1' to a function without heap allocating an array, on the down side gestures at the software security landscape.

Similarly the problem with other previous attempts to add bounds checking to C is that they didn't consider "must be able to be adopted by system frameworks without breaking existing ABI", which is what this attempts to do. The caveat is that it does have to include `unsafe` annotations and builtins to deal with APIs that don't have any actual bounds information (a classic example might be something like `gets(char*)`).

Everyone does basically agree with you: the key safety of the modern "safe" system languages is that "memory is just a bag of bits" is not safe. Hence the strict typing, strict maintenance of lifetime (GC, refcounting, lifetime's as part of the type system), weird concepts like bounds checking (:D). Doing this at the actual hardware level (as you're implying with registers) doesn't really work - there's too much variation in how languages work, how languages work changes over time, and it's also extremely expensive - in cpu time, memory overhead, and silicon area. Organizations have tried it in the past and I don't recall any actually being successful, except as examples of why "CISC is bad" :D
https://archive.ph/JWgGv
QR codes are still a valid option where the cafe is self-service
Is the quality of your work a life or death matter? If not, don't take it seriously. Even if you were perfect, it doesn't matter, because nearly all work depends on other work you don't control.
Yeah this is something that has been on my mind. It is possible because I know other apps do this but I haven't looked into details of the API. I totally get the appeal and have received many requests to add this.

THere is an option to export bookmarks in the bottom of the settings and technically if you are a very hardcore person you could set up a Python script to import them but of course this is way too hardcore for most people.
For example, we could write a program that hard-codes a secret key, and then signs bitcoin transactions with that secret key, but only if the transaction has value less than 0.5 bitcoin. Then anyone who has the program can sign things of small value on our behalf; if the program is indistinguishably-obfuscated, they won't be able to get any additional information about the key itself, or use it in any other way.

I guess just encrypting the key won't let you use it to sign things.
SLAPP suits are a thing in the US. You might not go to prison for your speech but that doesn’t mean you can do it.
Great, but let him fail on that learn and build something else or try to defend.

These kind of predictions are pointless IMO. Just look at how many products Google killed because there is no mass audience for it. Not even talking about Google+
Of course they do, though not to a big company like Google for something trivial like this when they could pay a bit of money. Threats aren't cost free.
What an impressive build, doing full risk v with no Soc at all is a major feat
GPT-4 hit it out of the park:

The question seems to be asking about two different types of "pounds": one as a unit of weight (the pound of feathers), and one as a unit of currency (the British pound).

A pound of feathers: This is a measure of weight. In the avoirdupois system (which is commonly used in the US), a pound is defined as exactly 0.45359237 kilograms.

A Great British pound: This is the unit of currency in the United Kingdom, often symbolised as £. The weight of a physical £1 coin, according to the Royal Mint, is 8.75 grams.

So, if we are comparing the weight of these two "pounds," a pound of feathers is heavier than a physical £1 coin.
That is a story to fit a theory.
Generations in a profession are not discrete units it is made of a blend of people born every year between the eldest and youngest.

Those that fought against a new idea are colleges of those that fought for an idea and colleges of those that are ambivalent to the idea
The should have chosen a 1024 core box and really shocked the world.
Former GitHub CTO Jason Warner Raises $26M for his new startup
Patents holder might be aware of you, but they still go into legal battles for money.

AMD have a lot of money to lose.

George Hotz $5M OSS company - well, not so much.
Now they need to subpoena both PyPI and the payment processor. It does slow them down but effectively does nothing to "thwart future subpoenas from the total surveillance state".
QR menus are a life saver for large meetups or people you know casually. You can just scan and pay without leaving the conversation, and there is no headache around trying to recover payments from everyone, especially if you don’t know them all.
Fair enough, commodity fetishism should always be avoided; but I myself plan to spend a little more than $6 a bottle on champagne at my wedding.
> Don't overestimate the general audience.

I mean, yeah, sure, in 2019. But it's 2023, and certain world events forced it so that even my parents can read a QR code with their phone now.
You mean like for retrofitting an existing satellite? It seems like we're beyond the era of extremely constrained embedded environments, even for space hardware. Several hundred Mhz PowerPC based avionics computers with hundreds of MB of RAM seemed pretty common 15 years ago.

What would a C interpreter do that wouldn't be done better by simply uploading a new compiled binary, though? The source code is most likely less space efficient than machine code.
See Rejection Therapy on how to recontextualise: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rejection_Therapy

Here's a podcast episode about the game: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/01/16/3772390...
Very nice - I look forward to a PR. Contact me if you have some question about the code and I'll try to help you out :)
Strategically, the ICBM fields are warhead sponges. Each one only has a single warhead, but you'd want to target each of the silos, plus each of the launch control centers with more than one warhead, in order to keep them from launching. So a missile squadron would get hit with something on the order of 110 warheads in order to keep 50 warheads from launching.

But there are other strategic targets in or near cities. And those, it goes from having 2 warheads each, to havine 20+2 warheads each. So for the cities that don't get defended, it really sucks. But now instead of 1550 warheads hitting ~750 targets, it's 1550 warheads hitting ~75 targets. Because the attacker doesn't know what's going to survive to the target and has to choose their top targets that must get plastered.

Except it's worse: AEGIS BMD ships can launch from pierside. They don't have the range to defend the entire US but do for about half the US. So that's another wrench in attacker's plans (exactly how many SM-3 can hit depends on how many missiles are available at that time, which is a much more difficult thing to determine than the number of GMD interceptors).

MAD isn't a military doctrine. You won't see it on any doctrine publication of any service. The problem is the "Mutual" part. We don't want to die for our country. We want the other poor bastards to die for there. It's merely "Assured Destruction".