skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Take this as an anecdote, but I have a friend that works at the top of a large quantum computing program at a well known company and he related once that the government is making it very difficult for them to retain talent in the field and make progress. The government feels it has to be at the forefront of quantum tech because of the possibly game-changing encryption capabilities. It was a bit chilling to hear but not at all surprising.

As a participant in the "digital underground" since the early 80's, we were very aware of "ECHELON", "5 eyes", and other spying programs. The "Snowden revelations" are not really anything new, living a life around digital communications 20 years before most people ever heard of the internet it was clear very early that surveillance is just something the government is going to do. And yes, they definitely would consider it top-secret info if they did create a quantum computer capable of cracking modern encryption. We wouldn't know about it unless someone leaks it, but I don't really care if anyone leaks that info - they either already have it or will have it first so it's fair to just assume that they do have that capability.
That standard is completely impossible to reach based on the way these models function. They’re algorithms predicting words.

We treat people and organizations who gather data and try to make accurate predictions with extremely high leniency. It’s common sense not to expect omnipotence.
> Basically anyone who sits at a panel, interview or a discussion and talks about geopolitical affairs. There’s an implicit expectation that you talk about certain topics in a certain way, and that way usually conforms to the narrative that’s acceptable to the apparatus of power.

How do you know that this is true without mind reading or lie detection powers? I'm not being sarcastic. You see these people talking and have somehow arrived at the strong belief that they do not believe what they are saying. How?
There are many covid counterfactuals we'll never know the answer to, but personally, I wish we could see the timeline where Trump won the election. Would the vaccination positions have been completely flipped? Pre-election you had democrat leaders saying things like "I wouldn't take a Trump vaccine." If we could only see that play out, I think it would expose how arbitrary much of the US political division really is.
Makes a fun sound bite but given the context was he was speaking about a program for people to navigate voter suppression, do you really think he has a secret voter fraud plan and accidentally revealed it like that Politicians speak a lot and I know I myself can mix up words sometimes and I don’t speak nearly enough.

> OK, trump wanted the TRUTH to come out, he wanted facts exposed to the american people, that admittedly benefitted him, but still, facts relating to illegalities to his political opponent.

That’s just clearly false.

> Russia tried to hack Hillary Clinton’s office five hours after Trump called on Moscow to find her deleted emails

https://www.vox.com/world/2019/4/19/18507580/mueller-report-...

So basically Trump solicited a third party to commit a crime on his behalf. As far as I know that makes you an accessory. Also Russia later also hacked the RNC so the lack of release of anything incriminating there leads a reasonable person to conclude I think that they have blackmail info on the RNC that they’re holding back because they have an agreement with the elites in that party. Notice how especially pro-Putin right wing media has been since that time period.

The Meuller report is pretty thorough. If you haven’t read it at least find unbiased analysis of what it shows.
But would GPT4 actually check something it had not checked the first time? Remember, telling the truth is not a consideration for it (and probably isn't even modeled), just saying something that would typically be said in similar circumstances.
> but no one has looked at the biology of it to understand that aspect as current tech lighting usually is one light wavelength instead of the two that are needed.

Wat. You can buy lights on HLG right now that will hit blues and reds. (And various wavelengths in between.

https://horticulturelightinggroup.com/collections/lamps/prod...

If you want fancier arize life2 have like 9 profiles?

https://images.salsify.com/images/zji236jwdstg4q9dyc6d/HORT1...

Apogee founder is also doing a ton of research into far red and its impact.

https://www.apogeeinstruments.com/epar-sensors/

What is this “second wavelength” that is being missed in your mind?
jeeze, save some for the rest of us!
How you went from “seems plausible” to “this man must believe Cocaine Bear is happening repeatedly” is an impressive leap.

Aside, I think your post highlights why commenting on the internet is so painful. All I‘ve done is highlight a factual anecdote w/ attribution, without speaking negatively of anyone, and you saw it necessary to denigrate my intelligence.

I think your point about Glassdoor reviews vs. rideshare cancellations works fine without the accompanying commentary.
HTTP defines the POST method explicitly as non-idempotent
> It has but mainly only in areas where adopting it allows cutting costs and is not the end product itself.

That's a lot of areas for RISC-V.

It doesn't matter to the end user if the end product (Phones, Tablets, TVs, routers, Home automation gadgets, etc) has ARM or RISC-V.

On the desktop, the end-user may care about whether their software still works, and as such the ISA matters.

In appliances, which is where ARM is dominating, the end user's don't care about whether they can run their existing spreadsheets, or powerpoint, or games, or other software that won't be ported. They only care about whether the device is still as usable as their previous device.

If end users cared at all about the ISA, ARM would never have taken off for phones, tablets, etc.

In this space (that ARM is dominant in), the ISA isn't the end-product; the device is.
Correct, not a lot has happened in Trigonometry or introductory calculus for centuries but colleges are always requiring newer editions.
Pesticides and herbicides found to be biggest cause of bird decline in Europe
What makes you think they have not done that already and what we are seeing is not their desired state of affairs? It's not that Zuckerberg or Brin, for example, take BART or need to fend off the deranged junkie who camps in the entrance to their apartment every night.
Wow. Insane that he lost his bonus for being a good lead dev.

Some dev had put the classic `<=` instead of `<` in a for loop check and the for loop body promptly corrupted some memory leading to heisencrashes. It took weeks to narrow down with 10+ hour days. Once they did and fixed it the boss asked for a name who had written the offending code. Timothy did not bend. Boss was salty and cut his bonus.
Google’s AI Search Feels Like a Content Farm on Steroids
Landmark Attention: Random-Access Infinite Context Length for Transformers
the key to 90% programmer is though, zig seems to be 100 times easier to master.

to me, use zig for c,use rust for c++
Hi guys, please feel free to check out - it took bloody ages to finish (it probably still has a few bugs) . On the plus side it has so many cool features, such as:

+ Generate playlists based on your mood, favorite era, activity and genre

+ Crossfade between tracks for seamless listening

+ Listen uninterrupted with no ads!

+ Play music in the background
Scar tissue comes from leaving an issue unaddressed, it’s not related to how it’s addressed.

My wife, “it pisses me off when you don’t do the dishes on your night like you did last night!”

Me, “oh shit, I completely forgot. It’s not intentional, I’ll set a calendar reminder.”

Scar tissue isn’t from “aggressive” or even “accusatory” words. It’s unrelated.
You can actually do that already. It's one of those things where the specification is a bit loose on this. Elasticsearch is an example of a product that supports doing a GET with a body to do search. Works fine but not all http clients allow you to do this so they also support POST.

Nice discussion on HTTP GET with a body here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/978061/http-get-with-req...

TLDR. the http 1.1 spec was a bit vague on this and allowed people to send a body but specified that servers should ignore that if they did. Later updates of the 1.1 spec removed that sentence and actually allow this. The caveat that the spec mentions that some implementations may not support it.

So an update is not needed; it's already allowed.

I tend to not get too hung up on the meaning of http verbs. I sort of lost interest in the endless debates on this years ago. I like a well designed REST API of course and I try to follow the principle of the least amount of surprise when I implement one myself. Using exotic new experimental http verbs would be surprising. Using GET this way is also a bit surprising. I actually steer clear of using PATCH as well. Just use a PUT or a POST and move on.

Adding new verbs to HTTP is redundant as far as I'm concerned. Not really against it but where does it stop? And what do we get out of it? It doesn't sound like it's worth the trouble.
What Is Lacto-Fermentation?
The fact that you cite has been been shown to be false: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact-check-biden-voter-pr...

From your enthusiasm I'm going to guess you'd not be satisfied with that fact.
Those things are checked and screened for even in places where yearly checkups are unheard of.
I don’t think the marketing around photoshop and chatgpt are similar.

And that matters. Just like with self-driving cars, as soon as we hold the companies accountable to their claims and marketing, they start bringing the hidden footnotes to the fore.

Tesla’s FSD then suddenly becomes a level 2 ADAS as admitted by the company lawyers. ChatGPT becomes a fiction generator with some resemblance to reality. Then I think we’ll all be better off.
Well a lot of people were annoyed Texas tried to blame the issue on renewable energy. Also people saw the private management of the grid or whatever being arguably attributable to the failures (outages, people freezing, people being overcharged) as a case study for why Republican strategies are less than ideal. Also, just everything is politicized because it’s easy to do so when you’re constantly on Twitter reacting to other people’s reactions.
What's your redundancy setup in the 45 drive configuration? I would guess 20-22 mirrors with 1-5 hotspares, but it's not clear.
My main takeway is that the guy who registers chatgtp.com is going to make a lot of money by providing bogus answers to frivolous questions :-)
It depends on what you mean by "your own decision". For example: If someone wants to smoke in the office that should be their own decision.
> That people think these models “tell the truth” or “hallucinate” is only half the story.

A meta-problem here is in choosing to use descriptive phrases like tell the truth and hallucinate, which are human conditions that further anthropomorphize technology with no agency, making it more difficult for layman society to defend against its inherent fallibility.

UX = P_Success*Benefit - P_Failure*Cost

It's been well over a decade since I learned of this deviously simple relationship from UX expert Johnny Lee, and yet with every new generation of tech that has hit the market since, it's never surprising how the hype cycle results in a brazen dismissal of the latter half.
If the model could tell when it was wrong it would be GPT-6 or 7. I think the best 4 could do is maybe it can detect when things enter the realm of the factual or mathematical etc and use a external service for that part
This isn’t steganography, man.

Lindell produces files from somewhere (unspecified) of some (unspecified) nature and without explanation makes a claim that they show evidence of crime X.

The goal in this situation cannot be to prove that there is no data here related to crime X. That would be equivalent to proving that a seemingly random string of bits cannot possibly encode a secret message.

The goal is to show that it is implausible that the files could represent evidence of crime X, given the circumstances in which the data was encountered. Not only did the author accomplish this, but the real telling point is that, with five million dollars at stake, Lindell could produce no substantial rebuttal from any of those 50 other hackers, nor any other expert who could say words to the effect that “this is PCAP data even though it is in a format never before associated with PCAPs” or “the reason the data appears to be recently created is [plausible explanation X]”
Correct. Proactive medicine would be to prescribe a healthy lifestyle that’s customized for an individual. Traditional medicine like Ayurveda tries to do that. It’s kind of baffling that western medicine doesn’t really think like that.
> Even HMO is very lax in actually taking care of people.

Makes sense. The premium\cost is largely already paid so the less work is done, the higher the profit. It is FFS where you have to be careful about doctors ordering too much work.
Or similarly what if Clinton wins in 2016, and gets stuck with the mess and cratering economy in her re-election campaign.
A person who is mistaken looks like they're lying. That doesn't mean they're actually lying.

That's the thing people are trying to point out. You can't look at something that looks like it's lying and conclude that it's lying, because intent is an intrinsic part of what it means to lie.
Where does Github misrepresent their Chat beta? On their marketing website?
Pp-wave spacetimes (pp = plane-fronted and parallel) can with suitable separations can have arbitrary constant wave amplitudes. Such spacetimes admit a Killing vector field letting us have a sensible way of measuring the propagation speed of the wave. At any point where it is measured, the propagation is lightlike.

Parts of a spacetime around an equal-mass circular-orbit binary will be reasonably approximated by a pp-wave spacetime (edge-on, not too close to the sources, and over a duration where their orbit is negligibly contracting).
There is a difference. Is fiction a lie?
learning cloud is not necessarily using cloud for all things.

cloud adds capability to any engineer.

if i’m on coffeeshop wifi with my low power laptop, and i need to do something intense like compile linux, i’m sol.

unless i know aws. then i can open a new terminal, spin up a massive spot instance for 19.27 minutes, get that done, then self destruct[1].

being able to test lambda to s3 io, or ec2 to s3 io, with the same ease one uses grep and sed, is for great good. also it’s fun.

1. https://github.com/nathants/mighty-snitch/blob/master/kernel...
> I apologize for the confusion earlier. Upon double-checking, I found that the case Varghese v. China Southern Airlines Co. Ltd., 925 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir. 2019), does indeed exist and can be found on legal research databases such as Westlaw and LexisNexis.

This is the part that stood out to me the most. I've seen this "I apologize for the confusion earlier" language many times when using ChatGPT, and it's always when it's walking back on something that it previously said. In fact, everything about this quote sounds like a retraction.

If this is a retraction then that means that there are missing screenshots in Attachment 1 wherein ChatGPT stated the cases were fictitious, and Schwartz pushed back until it retracted the retraction.

I'm with Simon on this one, I think Schwartz realized his career is over and is frantically trying anything he can to cover for his mistake.
In the states, we'd be getting paid less if the companies should get away with it.

And in the states, we definitely don't collectively bargain.

So something else is the issue.
A Single Place for All Data Knowledge
"Well, that is being doubted -- and by some of the biggest names in the field."

An appeal to authority is still a fallacy. We don't even have a way of proving if a person is experiencing consciousness, why would anyone expect we could agree if a machine is.
Some people like Clojure syntax rather than S-expressions. Personally I don't get it, having arbitrary lists that require square instead of round brackets, arbitrary lists where pairs which belong together aren't grouped, and arbitrary lists where commas are interpreted as optional whitespace gives me a headache; but to each his own.
"“From a health perspective, the annual physical exam is basically worthless,” Zeke Emanuel, an oncologist at the University of Pennsylvania, has written after reviewing the research.

"Almost nothing in the complete annual physical examination is based on evidence," Michael Rothberg, who directs the Cleveland Clinic Medicine Institute Center for Value-Based Care Research, wrote in the esteemed Journal of the American Medical Association in 2014. "Why, then, do we continue to examine healthy patients?""
This is a bit of a loaded topic and the authors are intermittently conflating "annual physical" with what is now better called a "periodic health maintenance visit".

Aside from semantics, a periodic health maintenance visit is intended to provide an opportunity for age-appropriate evidence-based screening and preventive counselling as well as minimizing loss to follow-up and missed screening opportunities (pandemic-related patient access issues has been a great reminder of why screening is important). How often and when to do this is debatable, but specific tests have recommendations (the USPSTF is a great source).

In contrast, palpating an abdomen in the hopes of opportunistically catching an asymptomatic tumor or putting a stethoscope on someone's neck to listen for carotid artery narrowing as part of an annual screening physical exam is arguably negligent and homeopathic at best. Other than blood pressure and BMI, I can't think of another component of the physical exam that would have potential clinical utility in an asymptomatic patient (granted my residency days in primary care are many years behind me now).

Using the article's example of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, we have evidence-based recommendations on screening[0] which notably do not include a physical exam.

Current recommendations (expert opinion, weak evidence) for periodic health visits will vary but are typically something like every 3-5 years for patients < 49* without chronic conditions and annually > 50 which coincides with roughly when we start to screen for most malignancies and worry about cardiovascular disease. There are many safe and useful investigations (e.g. colon cancer screening, cholesterol) and interventions (e.g. vaccines) that can be done in this visit so calling an annual visit 'bullshit' is facetious although this is very accurate for the physical part.

*Women between 40-49 should also be getting an annual mammogram although this does not necessarily need an associated visit.

[0] https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recomme...
Just need support for recursive lifetimes
It's worth noting Smedley Butler and the Business Plot [1].

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot
Right. Technically speaking ChatGPT bullshitted[1]. It can only bullshit. It is entirely indifferent to truth or falsehood and thus it can neither be honest nor lie.

It is however an impressive bullshit generator. Even more impressively, a decent amount of the bullshit it generates is in fact true or otherwise correct.

[1] using Frankfurt’s definition that it is communication that is completely indifferent to truth or falsehood.
Aren't JWT tokens supposed to be public?
If cost isn't an issue there are existing commercial satellite phones and phone services that have been around for quite some time see Iridium, Inmarsat, GlobalStar. Or if you want a middle-of-the-road option so to speak there is Garmin InReach service that would allow texting via the Iridium satellite network.

In this case the officials are being issued phones. Some companies issue phones to employees. If your job is critical during a catastrophic event then your company should issue you a satellite phone. Perhaps corporations could get bulk discounts. Each neighborhood's CERT team should maybe invest in at least one phone to text others.

Of course if they are planning for a full scale nuclear exchange then those options may be useless when the different layers of the atmosphere are charged. HAM radio operators or even CB radios may be more useful for local communications. Long distance would require a courier and a lot of bottle caps. I have no idea what they are actually planning for. Perhaps EMP floated in on a few balloons that takes out power continent wide? Overload of the power grid? [1] Halting all petroleum imports and re-shuffling the locally produced fuel transport networks? Go 100% green in 2024?

[1] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36097173
> Whatever play would cease immediately

just like the christmas truce of 1914
Yeah I’m confused by this, isn’t it commonly understood animals dream? What other explanation is there for my dog moving her sweet little feet and barking softly while she’s asleep sometimes.
It worked like this for much longer. The oldest version I have around is 9.2 and it behaves the same. You probably are thinking of a somewhat more complex scenario...
One of the only text written in chatgpt's own website that comes each time when you chat with it is "ChatGPT may produce inaccurate information about people, places, or facts."
The Future of Blogging
> I do believe we need something completely new because the user hostile nature of the web today is so devastatingly toxic that I see no hope for the future.

Capitalism ate the HTML web and it's native to expect that it wouldn't eat the gemini web given there's a profit to be made. The thing that makes an alternative technology non-hostile is simply that it's too unpopular to make a profit from making it suck.
According to the study cited, they concede that annual checkups result in more diagnosis, but not in a decrease in morbidity. What you consider worthwhile, or worthless, is up to you I guess.
So Picard lied to me ?!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX3CpHa4sUs

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/The_Measure_Of_A_Man_(e...
The title has been changed from first person to third person, making it sound like it's a piece from some video game history vlogger. In fact, it's actually a first-hand account from the man himself.

"Timothy Cain: Why I Left Fallout 2" would be a better title.
As someone from the community, I absolutely love this design (and blog post). It would be especially great for returning options, tuples, results, etc. with no overhead at all.

I suppose it could also be useful to allocate int64, floats, and maybe even bigints on the data stack? I suppose it's more difficult to put C blocks like bigints or bigarrays in a region.
Oh no! It's Silent Spring again!
quite wrong! as of august 2022, the majority of deaths, at least in the US, were among the vaccinated

https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/why-do-vaccinated-people-re...
Conveying accurate information is hardly trash, they’re simply talking about counterintuitive effects.

Annual checkups for healthy people on average cost as many lives as they save. It’s better for people to know what kind of symptoms they need to seek medical treatment for than simply suggest an annual checkup is all that’s needed.

I just went to the doctor 2 weeks ago and he said I was healthy…
Just do your best.

Recording the moments can be a way of staying out of the way and making space for other people (but it can be a way of getting in the way too of course).

Anyway I think being present in ordinary moments is probably more important to your child. Your partner/spouse/etc can be another matter.

Good luck.
What's the other channel's URL?
middleboxes are free to drop the body of any GET request, and generally do so
Lol, oops: I meant OCaml, if that wasn’t obvious.