skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As @dusted said, one important thing to remember is the disconnect - the work you do is a culmination of any number of factors on a given day. I couldn't agree more.

For me, the biggest thing though is trying to have a learning or improvement focused mindset. Understanding that most comments and every mistake you make are a step in a direction where you've learned something and gotten better. You, the codebase and the reviewer are all better for the experience.

Also - it IS okay to feel a little bad or frustrated when you've done a piece of work you're particularly proud of and it gets a lot of criticism. It's important to keep the above in mind, but it's also human. Don't feel bad for feeling bad. Just try to regulate it, and remember it's for the better of yourself and everyone.
"It adds mental overhead."

To me `const` removes mental overhead -- if I pass a const object somewhere, I can be sure it doesn't get changed. I don't need to inspect the code to make sure it doesn't call any methods that modify the object or trust a probably outdated comment or documentation.
The article certainly has a point, but OTOH the goal of a suicide prevention hotline is to, well, prevent suicides. If someone is close to commiting suicide out of their own free will, calls the hotline, but is obviously still unstable, maybe it is justified to detain them until they are no longer in danger? And of course the operators of the hotline will be cagey about admitting they may track users, out of fear that knowing about this might prevent people from calling the hotline and getting help.
ASCII Art Wonder
> the worst case model for CO2 emissions still wouldn't have us hit those levels for 75 years.

Honestly that’s really not reassuring. I would have hoped it take far longer than that
i wouldnt call russias military anywhere near "2nd most powerful", very very far from it.

but the reason is simply, russia isnt out to destroy ukraine as a mortal enemy, as such, there are huge limitations to what can be done, and ukraine has some advantages here. if russia wanted to, they could simply bomb ukraine to pieces, all over ukraine, if they wanted to. They clearly done
That's exactly what I'm not saying. These contrived examples only strengthen my view.

> sing loadly in a movie theatre.

Perfect example. Inappropriately making sounds with your mouth, not holding an illegal belief.

> express to an angry crowd the viewpoint

The issue is the context of the angry crowd, not the content of beliefs. Do you believe the US will penalize me for believing crypto currency is safe and stating that publically?

> thebigwinning sexually assaulted coworkers and stole money at their last job'

They are indeed allowed to believe that. They can't be taken to jail for holding that view of me.
Now if they tried to get me fired with false evidence that would be a problem. If they caused damage to my business reputation without evidence that could result in civil damages.
They could just copy the div with the content over to evade detection of the website’s owner
So can the concept of mental illness, and already has
your API tokens could still probably get sniffed in the requests?
We just launched our first product on product hunt. Really looking forward to receive feedback about our software so we can further improve it.
For another empirical example, the linux kernel requires marking all address-dependent accesses via rcu_dereference or LOAD_ONCE. In particular rcu_dereference has an entire section on all the restrictions on what you can do with the result to prevent the compiler from messing with it. For example only deal with pointers, avoid cancellations, etc. Only the things that have been empirically been shown to be safe are allowed.

Of course "do what gcc x.y does" is not a good spec so the standard tried to specify exactly the behavior of consume is, but it failed to be implementable.
TIL the complexity of VPN is still higher than my desire to self host. I've run OpenVPN in very complex configurations across multiple datacenters for companies, I've worked on distributed systems and networking tech for decades but honestly all of this is still very much in the, too painful to setup, state. I'm playing around with Tailscale Funnel now and the tsnet package in Go, that's pretty nice. Embedding headscale or running it separately seems like a huge effort but I like that I can programmatically build things on Tailscale.

More and more I'm just thinking stuff like what Signal did with a proxy server makes sense. Run a bunch of proxies, hide the complexity. Maybe default it in the browser. Maybe I'm old, who knows.
I was pleased with how expect's man page [0] oriented me (instead of "it's all there, go figure"):

> Commands are listed alphabetically so that they can be quickly located. However, new users may find it easier to start by reading the descriptions of spawn, send, expect, and interact, in that order.

[0] https://linux.die.net/man/1/expect
How to Create Your Own ChatGPT Plugin
You can't be a white supremacist without thinking other races are inferior. That's hateful by definition. They are stereotyping an entire race in a negative manner. They are denying the basic humanity of billions for what end? The Third Reich didn't immediately start throwing Jewish people into death chambers. They had to build up to that moment by dehumanizing their victims.
So for me, I take criticisms personally, but only personally. However, it comes across to others that I am upset with them and hence I have heard a lot during my career that "hey, we are very careful giving you feedback, because you can take it personally and react".

I don't know what to do, because I don't like burdening someone else, or failing myself to a point where someone has to give me feedback. Just a perfectionist attitude.
Not using this, but tangentially related is (full disclosure, i am a maintainer of this project) live-bootstrap, which uses about a KB of binary to do a full "Linux from scratch" style thing - read https://github.com/fosslinux/live-bootstrap/blob/master/part... for all 143 steps you have to go through to get there.
I've yet to see a QR-code ordering system that let you choose to pay at the end of your meal. The idea of deciding how much to tip before you've even interacted with any of the staff or tasted your meal seems utterly absurd to me - what are you actually tipping?
If I were running a restaurant I'd explicitly avoid using a pay-up-front system largely because I'm sure for most customers it would remove any incentive to tip based on the level of service/quality of food provided.
Well is it not intuitive that something being blown by a moving fluid approaches speeds equal to the speed of the fluid?
You'll rather take dodgy herbs and supplements than real medicine? No surprise you're unvaccinated, lol.
I really love the documentation for this project! Super-intuitive!
Don't feel like you're the only one. It seems very common for people to have different flavors and degrees of feelings like this. Some inexpert questions to maybe consider:

* Where you work, does it feel safe in general to acknowledge mistakes? Is there a culture of humility, and the team supporting each other? Are the most skilled/experienced/respected the first to point out when they made a mistake? How do managers/leads react when learning of a mistake? Do you feel a general sentiment like mistakes are human, and that everyone i supporting each other and wants everyone to succeed? (This might not be just you, but something the company can improve.)

* Do you have a feeling about how your skills/performance relate to the needs/expectations of the team? Do you feel like you're appreciated enough? Do you feel the Impostor Syndrome? How does your current experience level fit in your team or company?

* You said "unintentionally snarky", but do you ever feel that someone is being mean, overly critical, or disrespecting? What about that being your initial reaction, and then later you decide it was unintentional?

* Do you feel like the perception of others when you make a mistake threatens your future?

* Do your thoughts seem to be mostly about meeting your own internal expectations of yourself, not so much what others think? Were you raised with high expectations put on you?

* Have you worked with a therapist/counselor on this? I'd think it'll take them awhile to get enough context about your work situation, but that's normal, and they have a lot of relevant training and experience that we don't. Your health insurance probably covers this.

* Have you talked about it with a trusted colleague where you work, maybe a trusted manager? They probably won't be as skilled as a therapist/counselor at all facets of this, but they have direct information about some of the context.
I dunno. I'll take my high tax rate and universal healthcare any day.
One thing I learned recently is that, the more you pursue a dream, the more you realize that people are not born equal. That resonated so much with my past failures, and now I kind of understand what this article is talking about.

That being said - From time to time I do regret chasing my old dream, but I guess I’d only be more regretful if I didn’t. It’s ok to give up! But maybe at least give it a try.
Focus on the opportunity being presented to you to improve your work. It's a gift. Embrace the fact that ultimately your work can only improve thanks to feedback. Realize that by taking feedback personally, you're actually discouraging future feedback and indirectly you are actively decreasing the quality of your work.

Changing your perspective can make it easier to take feedback non-personally in the future.
Chesterton's fence, possibly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Chesterton%27s_fence
It's not really rhetorical.

People absolutely should not be subjected to bankruptcy in order to get adequate health care, but there's an aspect of personal responsibility that needs to be considered.

In NZ we have ACC, ACC is a universal insurance plan that covers injuries only (we don't have universal healthcare) so some dickhead can shatter his knees jumping of the roof of a three story building and be fully covered, but my little cousin with a disintegrating hipbone got no help from the state.

I think we should expand to universal healthcare (no chance), and failing that ACC should not be abolished (no need to throw ambulance chasers and insurance fraud into the mix) but I do think that the state should have the power to recoup the costs in the case of grossly negligent behaviour that leads to predictable outcomes.

Beyond momentary acts of idiocy, there are also lifestyle choices that have a significant impact on the health - for example, my morbidly obese aunty has had damned near every one of her non essential organs removed - I firmly believe that tax payers should not be on the hook for her (or anyone else's) wilful self-neglect.
Idk to be honest, it seems like you are defining esoteric in a very narrow sense, which borders on "no true scotsman", such that anything AI would be capable of producing would no longer fall within the definition.

Imo stack canaries is esoteric, at least relative to myself. On reading the first google result, I can understand the jist of the intent, but it would certainly take me time to understand the details of how it works, and to come up with an implementation. And if I didn't see it mentioned in this thread I never would have even known to search for it, and probably would have had to dig through a lot of domain knowledge to even know it's something that exists. That's the same way something can be esoteric, even if it's written about and available to everyone with access to a university library, because anyone without domain knowledge would not even know it exists or why it's relevant.

And I'm sure you can agree that if Google did not exist, probably stack canaries would be unknown and inscrutable to a vast, vast majority of developers. So if we go with your definition, the invention of Google certainly greatly reduced the amount of esoteric knowledge in existence, by making information easier to access in general. So I would argue that generative AI further reduces the scope of which information could be considered generally inaccessible,
Clearly he's referring to the citizens of a nation.
Can you think of policies that would help achieve a better balance between undertreatment and overtreatment?

I could see how a lot of well-meaning people could individually decide that it's better to treat than to ignore, but when you add it all up it becomes a nightmare for the patient.
Libraries, backed by professional associations and legal departments, usually follow developments regarding copyright laws (at least on a national level) very closely und provide detailed guidelines for their employees on how to handle these kinds of requests. Your typical librarian is probably more knowledgeable about copyright regulations than the average citizen. Also, some librarians are also legal professionals (I'm friends with two such persons).
A big development for me with this was realizing that good engineering is not about constant perfection, but about making pragmatic improvements and adapting to constantly changing circumstances. Seek the 20% effort solution which solves 80% of the problem and let day-to-day disagreements slide.
I remember travelling around Europe as a young adult in the late 00s.

In every country, the teenagers dressed slightly differently, and these styles were all very different to what I saw on the streets at home in London.

Now, in every European city the teenagers, and the younger adults <35yo, are all wearing one of a handful of styles, which have been unified across borders by social media.
Okay, let me tweak my assertion a bit. I agree that evaluating is easier than creating - that is the basis of my assertion too. And I agree that in general sense, you don't need to write to tell if what you're reading is any good, for the purpose of making you informed or entertaining you.

However, when you're using ChatGPT to write things for you, you are in a different position. First of all, you're not the audience - you're the editor. This will make your determinations different, as you're re-evaluating a work you're iterating on, and core points of which you're already familiar with. The same applies to writing on your own (where you're both the writer and the editor for yourself), but writing forces you to focus much more on the text and thoughts behind it, which I believe teaches you to make more nuanced determinations, with much greater fidelity.

Secondly, when you're writing - especially if you bother to enlist the help of an LLM - you usually have a specific goal in mind. Writing a love letter, or an advert, or a business e-mail, or a formal request, etc. requires you to think not just in terms of how it "feels" to you in generic sense of entertainment or knowledge transfer value. You need to put some actual thought into the tone, structure and the wording. Writing, again, forces you to do that.

I can get away with letting GPT-4 write half the text in my correspondence at work (INB4 yes, I have temporary access to company-approved model instance on Azure), because I've written such text myself so many times that I know exactly whether or not GPT-4 is doing a good job (I usually end up having it to do two or three variants, and then manually mix sentences or phrases from each). Even with that experience, I still consider it to be a tool for overcoming mental blocks associated with context switching - I wouldn't dare just having it both generate and send e-mails for me. People who never got the experience of writing specialized correspondence, I just don't think they'd be able to tell if the output of an LLM is actually suitable for the goal one wants to achieve.
I believe that the answer lies in the question itself. It's a "criticism of your work", not you.
And Minix 3 is an OS?
Presumably the voting-age population in the US that allows people to die untreated (or buried in medical debt)
Seems pretty vanilla compared to the full fat, popular alternatives? Absolutely!

Does it seem vanilla compared to vanilla? Haha..
So long as insurance providers are obligated to cover individuals that can’t afford the premiums, then sure, why not. But if you’re going to do that, you might as well cut out the rent seeking, handle it at a government level, and make it cheaper overall.
First of all, everyone takes them personally on some days/circumstances and to varying extents.

I try to categorize these bits of feedback by “is it at least partially true?” and “was it well-intended?” If it’s either of those things (most are both), I want to figure out what I can learn from it and realize that I’m the only possible person who will care about this feedback in 2 weeks’ time, so it’s up to me whether to care about it or ignore it.
So now we have a framework that doesn't want to be a framework? They might call it "VoidJS" instead, as in void = vacuum = so lightweight it's almost as if there's nothing there?
>plant that grow in more dry condition aka dessert.

The CO2 may be evenly distributed in the atmosphere but water isn't. Changes in sea currents and the jet streams can make desserts green but also turn green place into desserts.

Higher temperatures mean wider spreading of disease transmitting insects like mosquitos or the fungi that adapt to higher temperatures so they can now survive in humans, add these new threats to other problems like multidrug resistance of bacterias and our future isn't as bright as you picture it.

Corona was kind of a warning shot, something deadlier could have been much more devastating.
Storing the catalogue on the PC is standard. But being able to rebuild that catalogue from scratch is also standard. I’ve not used any tapes before now where you couldn’t recover the catalogue.
No.

https://ubuntu.com/legal/font-licence says that

> This licence allows the licensed fonts to be used, studied, modified and redistributed freely.

That is, you can use them on other distributions (or operating systems), and they can distribute them if they want (I believe for example Mint comes with Ubuntu fonts as default).
All this story and your conclusion underlines for me is what I already knew: Never ever tell the system that you have a problem. Working on fixing it yourself always has less fallout then whatever the system might be thinking is best for you. Just dont trust em, they will detain you forever and take away your individual rights.
Bad idea because even if they don't lose the data you may lose your access to the account due to things like random account suspensions.
Related: https://scsh.net/about/what.html
They could have taken another part of vanilla and called it nilJS, but unfortunately JS uses null and not nil, so it doesn't quite work...
Spend time thinking about times you got criticized but instead of trying to justify, explain, rationalize or just ignore it turn toward it and just accept it. Relax and just let all the thoughts (and more importantly) feelings run over you. Don't resist and don't turn away. Just let all those feelings out.
Our thoughts and feelings create an imaginary world that most of us live in in our waking life but that's all it is; thoughts and feelings. Its subjective, transient and temporary. When you can just indifferently witness you'll see how temporary and subjective (and silly) it all is.
This removes the person. You (the person) is the one that reacts, reaches and resist the thoughts and feelings. Stop that and the person disappears.
It's hard at first because you have to sit through all the uncomfortable feelings. It is worth it though.
Yes, same! My approach to less-critical PR comments tends to involve asking questions instead of saying "this is wrong/bad" so I was hoping it would be a positive story too.

I can see how a manager never providing actual guidance could be very frustrating though! I do recall a similar situation in the distant past, and in that case the manager was completely out of his depth and could do nothing but bluff.
Sounds like this would eventually generate a horrendous amount of e-waste.
What does “unopinionated Reactive UI framework” even mean?
Well, my case is that I like this app's UI (not interested in self hosted RSS), so I wanted to create similarly aesthetic website for my own use, but could not find "the picture" I had in my mind.
“AI-Tiquette”
Well but wasn't him who was pushing for regulation in the first place?

Though I agree the draft version is definitely overdone.
Fuck It, We'll Do It Live
IDK, if you asked me out for a LED-light dinner, with the eating place brightly lit by cold LEDs... I'd consider proposing to you, regardless of any other preference I may have for a partner.

Seriously, I hate warm lights. They're gloomy and make me spend 90% of my energy fighting to stay awake. I don't get why people are so fond of them (and why they're always keeping their places way underlit). I must be just wired differently.
I think the thing you have to do is look around and figure out how seriously your bosses & colleagues take their jobs. Caring more than everybody else leads to extreme frustration, and caring less leads to eventual dismissal.
Soviet calendar: five and six-day weeks
The Google Trends for "Snowflake" the company are clearly polluted by "Snowflake" the topic: https://screenbud.com/shot/1df2725e-0faf-4795-b066-585d0857d...
"and a bit of experience of what tastes good with what, and that was pretty much transformation from "I can make a decent food from recipe" to "I can pick what I have in fridge/pantry,"

This is where I'd love to get, but I have no idea how. I guess it's just experience and trying things out, but this is definitely the goal.
You named it, humane civilization, which probably also excluded the death penalty. The USA still has quite a way to go. Racist police violence, death penalty, universal healthcare, did I miss something?
Agree. So attention is like hierarchy of graphs where nodes are tokens and edges are attention scores per head.

Now what's trippy is this node has position data. So node feature and position it appears is used to create a operator that projects a sequence to a semantic space.

This seems to work for any modality of data.. so there is some thing about order in which data appears that seems to be linked to semantics and for me hints about some deep causal structure being latent in LLM
As someone who is actively working on using SAM, I would say that it leaves a weird border (2-5 pixels wide) of the cut out object so depending on the tasks, it may or may not be suitable. And in the demo, the server returned a way better image embedding than the open source one from Vit_h. There are a lot of issues on github talking about this. So take what you see on the demo page with a grain of salt.
iOS photos has this built-in AI thing where you double tap a photo and it separates the subject into a png with alpha. Imgur made available only a very low res version of your shot but still this is what I got, seems pretty good actually: https://wormhole.app/mbrY3#ab0qbAz7p26SYR0CEONDpQ

(also, cool shot!)
I've been seeing a number of brown lipped snails and pacific sidebands around the Seattle area recently. But there are some smaller ones as well. Most of the common ones are introduced, but pacific sidebands are a native species with a shell that gets a bit bigger than an inch across.

If you go to the beaches at low tide right now you'll likely see moon snail eggs.

Here's a PDF guide to Snails and slugs in Oregon:
https://www.oregon.gov/oda/shared/documents/publications/ipp...

The Burke museum has an iNaturalist project for snails and slugs, you could use it to see where to look. Or even contribute!
https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/slime-pacific-northwest
To me it has been immensely helpful to work with my own projections. As I've realised how much of my own inner world I project onto others, I've become more forgiving and unaffected by other people's projecting onto me.

There are many types of therapy that works with projections: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

Personally, i've done the work through ManKind Project, a non-profit for men's work.