skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I presume anything ChatGPT generates belongs to the user who asked for the code to be generated.

Machine generated works cannot be copyrighted, only human-created works. The part here that has yet to be determined is whether or not AI output is considered "machine generated". An argument could be made that writing a prompt is sufficient control to consider the output human-made for the purposes of copyright. If that's the case, then copyright will go to the human who wrote the prompt (or their employer).

This will, at some point, have to be decided in court. Right now, the only answer is "nobody knows".
Every instance of a program will use an amount of ram equal to the uncompressed size.

If the application is uncompressed, the uncompressed executable will be loaded into ram 1 time and be reused by every instance of the application.
Basically nobody outside of NY even remembers that Rochester exists, I was being lazy but I figured that most people would interpret NY == NYC.
No, the linked article is a summary of another article written to contradict the earlier researchers that made the claim about HSV spread being connected to the practice of kissing.
Yes, you're missing something: the CEO said, quote, "we love people sharing Netflix". There's no plausible interpretation where they're referring to people living under one roof, because of course those people can share the account. That's why they have profiles in the first place. Additionally, their premium plan includes "download on 6 devices". They didn't intend that for the average person who has 6 Netflix-capable devices themselves, as most people have far fewer.

No, the only viable interpretation of their account setup is that it's explicitly designed for several people to use a single account. That means the "several family members in one house" setup is the baseline, and "people sharing Netflix" couldn't reasonably mean "...with their spouse and kids living with them.
Any industry that can't sustain itself with a majority of workers who are "just doing it as a job" is doomed to fail.

I say this after doing SW development for a few decades. You can't count on "passion," "rockstars" or "10x developers." You can only count on the slogs who show up, do a good job and go home.
The New World of LLM Functions: Integrating LLM Technology into the Wolfram Lang
> It may seem weird to them at this time, but hopefully they’ll appreciate when they grow older

I have been raised differently, and with certain values. It is frustrating but ok to forbid or limit things, and to talk about issues.
But to snoop through one's private messages or similar communication, that's completely disgusting and I would have what? Appreciated? No, never forgiven (works both ways btw, the trust). Especially at teenage age.

I guess I shared voluntarily more with my parents and voiced issues than I would have in such circumstances, can just repeat: dis gus ting.
You appear to have confused "popular" and "profitable"
Why not just use "Correct Horse-with-a-C Battery Staple" as your password then?
Abo and Nusur, sittin in a tree, 𒆠 𒄿 𒌍 𒌍 𒄿 𒂗 𒄃
Possibly, but it seems like this this would be pretty easy to detect.

First, they should already know who has been sharing accounts. You haven't been having other households VPN to your local network for the past 5 years for Netflix. That gives them a great starting point.

They can look at SSIDs and not just your SSID, but all the SSIDs that your device is seeing. Even within a household, not all the SSIDs will be the same from room to room. For most people, there will be some overlap. Sure, maybe you live in a rural area and you're the only SSID around. For most people, it'll be hard to fake this.

Even if you make all the SSIDs look similar, have you dealt with your BSSIDs? BSSIDs can be used to geolocate most people pretty well. Almost no one has opted out of the big WiFi geolocation databases (or even knows they can).

Maybe you could have them VPN into your local network, but they could still use WiFi and other information to see that the connection is actually in a different location. Plus, as I noted, they should already know who has been connecting from multiple locations for years.
In English we call these "sweated", "caramelised", and "frenched", respectively. I'm not sure why the phrase "sweat" doesn't get much use outside of pro kitchens, it's a useful term.
Their stock went from $690 in Oct 2021 to $175 in June 2022.

That's a 75% plummet, which is definitely approaching the equivalent of struggling-to-keep-the-lights-on for a modern corporation. That's three quarters of the way to bankruptcy, big red flashing danger lights.

So of course this is a calculated bet to improve profitability. Virtually everything a for-profit corporation does is to improve profitability -- that's the whole point of being a business in the first place. What else would you expect?
I found that most of the time it was worth the time to invest a few hours/days into implementing the missing feature with Lua/OpenResty, if there wasn't already an Open Source extension available on GitHub.
It'd be interesting to find out how many times they practiced that song before recording it. It's hard to overstate how much time and attention people had before ubiquitous cell phones and internet.
Whatever, man. That's a lot of strawman arguments for why you can't drive an EV.

You can plug things into ABetterRoutePlanner.com yourself, and see that a common Tesla Model 3 could drive from Milwaukee to Seattle in 35 hours and 19 minutes. That includes only 5 hours and 3 minutes of charging, all at Superchargers along the highway. If you upgraded to the Model 3 Long Range, which it sounds like you ought to, that shaves the total travel time to 33 hours even.

The price of gas alone for that trip is more than half the cost of a direct flight. If you don't mind flying Spirit, it's less than a hundred dollars more. Since you care so much about the environment, you might appreciate that flying would also likely emit less CO2 than driving anyway.
Sounds like you need to learn to avoid the hype, mon ami.

They sucker you in, every time, and you don't learn.
> I am claiming (and have receipts for the claims) that public health professionals will provide advice that is damaging or risky in order to protect something else. They will intentionally mislead you so that some imagined total outcome is better. In the past, their attempt to do so resulted in personal harm or death for many (perhaps in the millions) because they're bad at managing the total outcome too.

Ok, I’ll bite. Relative to what alternative, exactly? Is this a testable claim?

## Actionable? Testable?

Or is this a historical comparison of the US public health advice against the best case advice in hindsight?

Can I compare advice from an alternative “private health” source that has my interests at heart?

In other words, going forward, do you have a source or algorithm (e.g. to combine different sources of advice) process that you think is more reliable?

## Your Decisions and Outcome

And you offer yourself as an example of doing opposite. That’s fine, but be intellectually honest that this is ‘at best’ a sample size of 1, and you didn’t really do the ‘total opposite’ of masking and exposure, did you?

Conceptually that is undefined — opposite here could mean so many things. Practically speaking, you didn’t share a tiny enclosed air space with obviously contagious people, did you?

## Subtext: apparent overconfidence

I think what I’m picking at is what appears to be an overconfidence and a lack of testable claims.

It’s fine to be skeptical of public health advice, but you seem to go further. I can’t really tell how far you are willing to go.

## Ensembling (like ML)

In my view, the key is gathering evidence and reasoning over it. Don’t throw out a source of information when you have a fairly good characterization of how it operates. Even flawed sources add signal.

## You Can Help Most of the People Most of the Time

Yes, public health make mistakes. And they aim to prioritize public health, not my health in particular. They should.

For most people, most of the time, following the advice of the CDC is a good ‘default’ starting point. Deviate at your own risk.

## We are the Idiots My Friend and we’ll keep on fighting ‘till the end

Somewhere around half (maybe more) of Americans make glaring errors regarding basic facts and critical thinking around public health. This is why almost all people should follow public health advice, even if changes a little bit every week — and even if the agency got it wrong last week.

Many of these people fall prey to politically motivated reasoning or conspiracy theory quackery.

## Impossible Standards

If people held themselves to the same standard that they are judging the CDC, they would not have a shred of self confidence left. Can’t stick to a diet? Can’t seem to keep your shit together? Yeah. But expect the CDC to predict the dynamics and mechanisms of the coronavirus and its impact on global health and supply chains. It is ludicrous. People by and large seem to be designed to complain about not themselves.

The pandemic was really a level of unprecedented change that few of us have seen since maybe Vietnam, the AIDS outbreak, or WW2.
> Admittedly, I never got past ECON 201, so I'm probably wrong on something here.

I wouldn't worry about it (myself, only ECON 101); after all the people opining the loudest are the ones who have even less ECON than me, nevermind you.

I think one of the largest mistakes made with medical insurance is removing the price visibility. The hospital cannot tell you how much a procedure will cost until after it is done. They can tell you how much it will cost if you pay in cash, so they have a good ballpark figure.

So the consumer buys something without knowing how much it will cost, and is then legally on the hook for paying whatever the cost is. This is broken.

Maybe it's unavoidable in this particular field (medical care), but the one thing you can be sure of when the consumer buys something without knowing how much it costs (and only paying the cost later) is that the price of that thing is going to skyrocket.
Even GPT-4 is not actually that good at it, and breaks down past a few simple rules. If you want an LLM to actually learn a language, today, you have to include enough of that language in its training data to begin with (I'm not sure if anyone tried it with fine-tuning).
I was also thinking about how they could've integrated this into every app, but I figured that simple tasks would be more reliable across all apps if they did AI-recognition on screenshots of the desktop + injecting data like "Installed Apps", then by the end of it output virtual keyboard event or a virtual click at an X/Y coordinate.

Just some afternoon postulating haha
I think Tolkien in particular felt he had a moral and spiritual message, although the way to act on it, if any, presumably wouldn't be to pretend to be living in his Third Age.
It should have been obvious from a parenting perspective. How did we become such idiots that we need healthcare professionals to tell us (which we do need)?

Do you want your child exposed to any arbitrary adult or other child, doing or talking about or showing any arbitrary thing, and in an environment that encourages and celebrates unconstrained sociopathic behavior?

It should have been an easy call for any parent long ago, and adult social media needs to be treated like a bar or R or NC-17 rated movie - not a place for children.

Bars that don't keep out children are considered nuisances to the neighborhood and shut down. Did you know that in some (maybe most) places, if someone leaves a bar and trashes the neighbor's car, the bar is liable?
Amazing. Every word of what you just said was wrong.

> AM radio is a cesspool of blatant conservative lies and rage bait

That exists to be sure, but it most certainly does not describe the entire spectrum across the entire country.

> It's what the angriest folks on the right pay attention to.

Some might, but there's plenty online who are much angrier. Do we condemn the whole internet as well?

> That's why it's "Free speech" despite being the single most regulated form of communication.

I can think of many more regulated forms of communication, for instance any S1 filing. The only thing you can't say on the radio during wild west hours is overtly sexual content.

> No other form of "speech" needs a license

Plenty of other areas need a license, for instance the entire rest of the electromagnetic spectrum, barring a few small holdouts.

> yet they think it's the free-ist there is.

It certainly provides the most-channel hours during which the microphone is open to the most people to be broadcast to the most listeners. I openly admit other forms of communication allow for more types of content, but none so freely-accessible to both listeners and speakers.
Misinformation existed long before scams: monkeys lie.
What LeetCode problem is that one?

(Yes, yes, is joke.)
Oh, that's a good point.
Facebook Graph API v17.0 and Marketing API v17.0
Man Shoots Roommate in the Butt for Eating Last Hot Pocket
The English language adds yet another adjectival phrase (e.g., "federal pound me in the ass prison" from the movie "Office Space"):

"Shoot-me-in-the-ass Hot Pockets!"

You can't buy advertising like this! Were I a store owner I would immediately markup my Hot Pocket prices.
Lol I'm not the one who made this, I am just curious.
There's no way people actually use random websites to generate their passwords, right? Like, I can't just post or comment a password generator to a reasonably-tech-savvy forum like HN and have people actually use it to generate their next email password, can I? Surely there's at least some communal wisdom about how to correctly obtain software that you can reasonably trust with such an important task?
Woohoo, technology is disrupting the religion market, nothing can possibly go wrong here
Debian's requirements for packaging of Go software is unreasonable. They expect every single dependency to be individually packaged. The total dependency chain of Caddy ends up being massive. We (the Caddy maintainers) don't have time necessary to allocate to a single distribution, to package and maintain every single dependency individually when all we want to do is ship a single static binary (plus some support files).

Instead, we ship with our own debian repo, hosting graciously provided by CloudSmith https://caddyserver.com/docs/install#debian-ubuntu-raspbian. This is packaged via CD with GitHub Actions, and you can verify the authenticity of the build since it's signed by Matt Holt's GPG key.

For RHEL, it's in COPR, and that's the best you'll ever get for similar reasons https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/caddy/caddy/
Because your idea makes no sense, to be frank. The tax inefficiency alone would be absurd.
Depends on how you define „poor rail infrastructure“. Germany has a lot of routes and pretty much everything is well connected, but the state that the infrastructure is in with constant delays and badly maintained tracks is pretty bad.
Nice try, we've been around since 2014. I had no idea about them, or even knew if they were around, when I named it.
I absolutely love the integration in VSCode with the official Go extension. I can debug a running web server with delve with minimal config. Same for tests. Just experiment with the options, there are quite a lot, and unfortunately some not very well documented like gopls ones, at least last time i checked.
Been using Harmonic daily for a few years now and I love it so much, it's an incredibly well made app. Thanks for making it, awesome that it's open source now as well!
> In a rational system, the only people who should be involved in health care are the patients and the providers (doctors, nurses, technicians, etc) who actually provide health care. Nobody else should be involved, let alone skimming profits from the care.

While I agree with the sentiment, hospitals require management to run well. They certainly don't need the amount of overhead they have, but it can't just be doctors, nurses and patients. Maybe in very small hospitals you could actually have doctors manage schedules and things like that, but once you reach a few dozen people you'll want to have someone coordinating availability and to deal with scheduling at the very least.
Is this unlike the idea that women's bodies are inherently sexual? The idea that women's sexuality has power over men (usually as described by men) comes up a lot in discussions about the sexualization of women's bodies. Is this something different than that?
"Bans are inefficient" , any source on this ?

This is a real question. Bans "seems" to me as an efficient tool, but I have no source either...
I absolutely love Harmonic! Great UI/UX and nice attention to details. Almost prefer browsing HN using it rather than the website :) Thank you for open sourcing!
I still cringe at the immature garbage we did in college over telnet and unsecured NIS/Ethernet Unix boxes not questioning whether anyone was recording packet traces for posterity. Luckily disk space was super expensive back then. :-)
Adding grammar will make it more predictable and less secure for the same word count.
> they view people homeless, struggling, or unable to afford healthcare as a moral failing

...until it's them. If you really want to rile up an old white rural dude with a Trump placard on their lawn, threaten to take away their healthcare subsidies. Or really any other kind, and for most farmers that's a long list. Then the sparks will really start to fly. They believe that government assistance is a God-given right for "salt of the earth" like themselves, but an absolute crime for those "other people" in the cities. It's not hard to see the subtext, even when they're not consciously aware of it themselves.
See also Google Cloud’s Assured Open Source Software service:

https://cloud.google.com/assured-open-source-software
Show HN: ChainForge, a visual tool for evaluating LLM responses
Hey all! I've been developing a prompt engineering interface that helps users query LLMs with parametrized prompts and compare responses across models. It's an early demo, but already we've used it internally in my academic lab to evaluate and choose prompts for other research projects that involve building LLM applications. Let me know what you think, or if you encounter any bugs or issues.

Blog post here: https://ianarawjo.medium.com/introducing-chainforge-a-visual...
This goes against the whole idea of that XKCD comic. If you want to come up with a password you can remember, you should string together a bunch of words that make sense to you. But if you want a password you can remember, randomly generating it (especially in a way that has low overall entropy per the current top comment) seems like a bad way to do it.

IMO the days of remembering multiple passwords are gone - either use a password manager, or thankfully the industry is moving to passkeys.
Were you an Electrical Engineering major, too?
Air France domestic backbone is home-grown a320s. Standard layout in their use of those is 174 pax.

TGV Sud-Est is 350000 / 174 ~= 2012 flights per day.

There's no airport in the world that handles traffic like that. ATL comes close at 1970 flights daily, but this 2012 is only the capacity on TGV Sud-Est. This doesn't count any of the other lines, of which there are many: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TGV_services

Trains are really intense.
Pfftt.. they'll just have a church fundraiser! Then maybe a gofundme to top it off!

I had some family members similar to this, and that was their actual thinking. "God will handle it. Our church always helps its folks". 30 years later... well.. pastor's changed, the focus is always on the younger families with kids and... my relatives, now in their 70s... just don't go to their church of 30+ years because "we don't feel all that welcome any more". So... their plans for church fundraisers is essentially off the table now.

But it took them 30 years to realize this, and they'd consistently voted against their future selves all that time. And I won't even say they "realize" anything profound or deep here. They've not switched party allegiance. Trump will still save them. ugh...
Thank you. Will keep this in mind.
US surgeon general issues advisory on ‘profound’ risks of child social media use
> But as more people say that and don't bother watching until there's a whole finished story, then even more shows get canceled earlier because nobody watched the first season.

That's still netflix's fault. They need to stop expecting the world to flock to their newest shows the moment they are released, there's too much competing for our attention, and instead invest in stories and creators they believe in, and make sure that they're always funding and releasing a complete and quality product. It doesn't matter if a show is only one season, so long as that one season has a satisfying conclusion.

Stories written to span multiple seasons are fine too, but they need to commit to seeing that show to its conclusion. Even if a show doesn't perform very well, some percentage of Netflix subscribers will enjoy it making it an asset for their library and on a long enough timescale it'll be worth it, but if they really want to cancel a show before the story has a chance to reasonably end, they'd be better off removing it entirely from their library. Right now their library is filled with shows that will entice new watchers only to piss them off when they learn the plug was pulled early, or which will sit unwatched by the people who have already heard that netflix screwed the show and its fans over and that's a liability.
When did I say "it can never be done"? Certainly it can, but you'd have to make some pretty drastic changes to the US healthcare market as a whole first- and those changes will be staunchly opposed by all the entrenched healthcare cartels. It wouldn't be easy to do it right, and it'd be very easy to do it wrong and make the whole situation worse (which is what the healthcare cartel would push for). The US healthcare market is a uniquely fucked up monstrosity, comparing it to the universal healthcare system of a country the fraction of our size doesn't make sense.

You say the government has little profit incentive, sure, but they also have little incentive to control costs. It's "other people's money", they spend it like drunken sailors, even when they're 30 trillion in debt. Look at what happened to tuition costs after the government started handing out loans for them. I'd take these calls for universal healthcare more seriously if they talked about addressing the underlying issues in the market first, but from what I can tell it's mostly idealogues pushing their pet policy without grounding it in reality. All the bad actors in the industry aren't just going to disappear or start playing nice when they start getting funded by taxpayers (more than they already are).
Kagi already does this, performing the same search multiple time’s doesn’t count against you (from my testing), so they must be caching, or your browser does, not sure.
There is a plugin which greatly improves UI and somewhat UX.
The extensive lack of database consideration in many decisions is indeed concerning, and obviously integrity checks should be standard and default.
Intel and Nvidia are the same.
> The backstory that seems to have been forgotten here is that self driving cars are still a money bleeding endeavor.

They also don’t work. At least not by any sane definition. Sure, if you’ve mapped the area in advance, nothing changed,the weather is nice and nothing unusual happens all might be okay but otherwise it’s a shitshow.

Human drivers are cheaper and more versatile. There is no point in this other than trying to persuade the markets Google hasn’t spanked millions on a dead end.
Doctors like it enough to spend 490 million dollars to keep it in place

https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/top-spenders?cy...
>spellcheck on commands

I prefer to just type "fuck":

https://github.com/nvbn/thefuck