skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This took me longer than I’d like to admit to decipher: “What Are You Really Trying To Do”
> I think there exist people who will enjoy that language, who will understand that language, and to whom that language speaks. My wife, possibly. My sister, almost certainly. Many others in my circle of friends, co-workers, and acquaintances.

But the desire to achieve self-expression through consumer choice is a fucking soul sickness. It's an empty simulation of meaningful self-expression. It's a (often deliberately!) useless substitute for actual political activity. Just because that kind of bullshit is pervasive and, in our society, widely effective for marketing purposes, doesn't mean it should be further propagated.

Free software is largely a refuge from that kind of bullshit, or at least the most cynical, cliche, shiny forms of it. Infesting Firefox with appeals of that kind is not the end of the world, I guess. But it is polluting the clean air I come to Firefox for in the first place with the same smog that's suffocating me everywhere else.
Global warming is going to increase food supply because carbon is an input to photosynthesis. Several studies have shown that increased carbon in the atmosphere increases crop yields and increases water usage efficiency by reducing plant transpiration.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/nasa-study-rising-...

On social media I've noticed a trend where people attribute every bad thing that immediately comes to mind to climate change. War, extinction, famine, disease and pestilence, I've even seen people confidently throw increases of rape in there when describing the impending hellscape sure to befall humanity in the next x years due to climate change, citing some very dubious chain of correlative logic.

The truth is that a warming planet will change things but not all changes are bad for humans, and those that are bad are not all catastrophic or unmanageable. I think it will do everyone some good to take a step back and look at things with an analytical and curious eye, and reject the urge to panic or spread addictive but harmful fear porn.
Hairdressers charge for a service and none of them will assume that they "own" your hair.
I think a data centre company posted some findings on this recently.
> or they just don't want to try a zillion frameworks

But isn't HTMX one of said zillion frameworks? What makes it any different?
My in-laws also have a Nissan Leaf from 2013. It lost some amount of capacity but there has never been a problem with it. It is crazy.
They don't need one number, they need two (or more) that are related in such a way they have cryptographic properties. And the math says to derive them from a seed. However the seed must be secret because it's a back-door.

Luckily everybody can generate their own seed and their contributions can be combined without knowing the seeds.

All zeros won't work because they don't have the properties.
Humans didn't exist during the last Ice Age. We've never survived an Ice Age and you certainly can't say anything for certain about our future. Technology has gotten into this mess. We can hope it also brings our salvation but I wouldn't bet the species on it.
Seems like they could easily offer some kind of gift card option.
I went with a Tesla over a Polestar because the Tesla has more range, is a lot more efficient, and has more power than the Polestar.
The linked courseware (required readings) is open and pretty good to get started.
Isn’t that very expensive?
We came to the exact same conclusion. EventBridge time triggers a Fargate task. The job automatically terminates the process after execution, so the container shuts down and all is good.
> Progress in a purely capitalistic sense, maybe—but in terms of human knowledge and innovation in technology, absolutely not.

No this is still the case, because even folks who understand deeply can only understand a few things deeply. I recently spent several years working in battery tech. The field could be years ahead of where it is now if so many of the field's most pressing problems didn't require researchers to deeply understand programming as well as their field.
The Polestar 2 glass roof is a little glass pane cut into the roof that costs $5000 extra. On the Model 3/Y, the entire roof is glass.
I am willing to accept that proposition in principle (though it basically rules out certain classes of apps from being nice on Android IMO).

For sake of argument, let's say that these design systems serve as proving grounds for new platforms. In that case I think there's some interesting discussion to be had!

The upteen complaints about things like Gnome 3 or Android's material design. Hell, lots of complaints about iOS 7 at that transition. If there are strong alternative design systems out there, those can be pushed forward
The first V4 Tesla charger was deployed in Europe recently. It has a CCS plug on it so you can charge all brands of EV:

https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/19/23689247/tesla-v4-superch...
Although the purchase price is higher, lifetime is not much different.

https://thedriven.io/2023/04/27/tesla-model-3-total-cost-of-...

And the Model Y is cheaper than the Toyota Rav4 which is in the same category. So cheaper purchase price, and no annual oil changes, cheap miles (at least over in Finland where gas is 2e/liter, 8.14usd/gallon and electricity is around 10euro cents/kwh).
Good time to repost this article, detailing the various UI inconsistencies that persist to this day in Windows: https://ntdotdev.wordpress.com/2021/02/06/state-of-the-windo...
This doesn't appear to be what the docs recommend anymore, which is exactly what my (obviously flippant) post was meant to highlight.
At least as a non-native english speaker I was a bit confused as to what an agent would do compared to using plain ChatGPT. I tried then the examples "Plan a detailed trip to Hawaii" and "Write some code to make a platformer game". I tried the same Hawaii sentence with plain ChatGPT and told it that it can browse the web. Now I am thinking that AgentGPT does seem a good tool on top of ChatGPT. As they say on the Github page it "It will attempt to reach the goal by thinking of tasks to do, executing them, and learning from the results". This was a whole lot more thorough service than what plain ChatGPT did with the prompt. I'm just thinking that maybe they should emphasize more those points already on the app page, about the core value it adds and how it does it. Perhaps even explain it some more than what that sentence from their Github page does.
Non native speaker here.

The unfamiliar programming language (which I've never used) seems to be binding some code to some type of validation event. "my" and "me" seem to refer to the input tag. "my.value" probably refers to the value of the input. If it's not foo it calls a setCustomValidity method with the input tag as the caller. Could be some built in method that you can call on any input tag or anything validatable.

Ok I just checked the link and setCustomValidity is part of the HTML5 Validation API (haven't worked on web dev in years).

I can assure you that the first person pronoun is among the first things we learn when studying English and assuming the code snippet does what I assume it does I'd say it's pretty intuitive to learn. Especially if we are comparing it to JS where "this" is not what you'd expect from using it in other languages, but the late-bound called of the function... except in all the cases where it isn't.

In any case, trying to guess how a programming language works is a very bad idea so it doesn't matter how obvious the language manages to be, you still should read the documentation.
I'm not talking about Autopilot specifically because it may be difficult to judge. But surely there is some statistics based solely on the car model?
They could start with a more coherent system period
I didn't consent to you replying to my comment. Should we compare the ways in which you're like a rapist? Should we call you a killer because you've killed a mosquito (an animal that serves no environmental purpose)? No, because your entire premise is absurd on its face.

You explicitly consented to the ads you dislike when you installed Firefox – Mozilla has been putting ads in Firefox in one form or another since at least 2015 and they've been very transparent about the whole thing. You can revoke your consent without penalty or lasting damage any time by uninstalling Firefox. You cannot do that with rape. You cannot uninstall rape and you cannot undo rape. These ads are not in any way comparable to rape.

Let me give you an example. Someone I know was raped in 2010. She never came forward to the police, but three other women, none of whom knew each other, did come forward to SFPD. Two of the three didn't even speak English. Despite all four of these women telling virtually identical stories all of the charges were dropped. How's that work? Turns out that without their knowing (and thus without their consent) this guy recorded everything including the initial implied consent. That all four of these women revoked their consent when things got way out of hand was ignored by the rapist and the court. No charges (e.g. illegal wiretapping) were ever brought against the rapist for illegally recording these women.

The woman I knew? She tried to kill herself shortly after. If I look back to 2010 I'd need more than one hand to count the number of women that have either attempted or succeeded in killing themselves as a result of rape. Go survey Firefox users and see how many have attempted suicide due to the harm these "non-consensual" ads caused. I'll wait.
I'm sorry, but if people often do this to you, maybe reflect on them actually being right? Or that you're legitimately asking a stupid question given your self-proclaimed lack of expertise?

People don't answer that way to be smug or so. They do it because the thankless person they're spending their own free time helping will just come back with a new asinine question the moment one answers their posed question. It's from experience after helping thousands of people, not pettiness.

If perhaps you're the one in a million case where this isn't applicable, just add the context, then. Don't be angry about having to do it, that's quite entitled given that you're asking people to solve your problem for free..
This spring I have been collecting pictures of the various fungi and slime molds in my yard. One of the stunnning things is how quickly they can change from slimy and wet to dried out and desiccated. In two days one went from wet bubbles (10:38 in the video) to dust on little stems (10:50). The time lapse pictures make me want to set up a camera and record the next one I find.

Here are some very cool images of Myxomycetes. The metallic looking species are very cool, I'd like to see one sometime.
https://www.myxotropic.org/gallery/
Fraud is both a criminal and civil matter.
Great! Now do data privacy, it is long overdue.
The val.town idea is very promising but I think it's not as social as it could be.

The val.town page is dedicated to developers and convinces with features. What I am missing is content. The explore page [1] has popular functions, which are the content of val.town, but they are not content in a social sense.

HN and reddit engage users before they make an account. It's very good that I can run code without making an account. But I have to interact and think before I am hooked. Could users be hooked on content? I could imagine a landing page on a second domain that would show the result of scripts that users vote to the top. (Of course the knowledge would lie in preventing dick pics.)

Adding votes should also be possible for the explore page itself. HN/newest is not as convincing as the ranked HN frontpage. A short Readme section and a result section would make the code more approachable.

The UX seems to be choosing precision over smoothness. Trying the HN Top Story in /explore, it's surprising that the result is just the title, without a link. To change that, I would prefer if a simple click on the function would directly allow me to edit the function. The ctrl-click with the new tab works, but it doesn't feel right.

[1] https://www.val.town/explore
> It also changes one of the plan's strategies: 2019's "Make long-term investments in AI research" becomes "Make long-term investments in fundamental and responsible AI research" in the 2023 document.

I can't help but think of Google's leaked memo "We Have No Moat, And Neither Does OpenAI". https://www.semianalysis.com/p/google-we-have-no-moat-and-ne... They saw an existential threat in the idea that they might be surpassed by a new player. Can't have that, need regulations defining "responsible" AI.
Five+ years ago when more of us believed that false promise that it was happening any day now it made more sense to have discussions about these kinds of hypothetical situations.
I'm a huge fan of VW, but the ID.4 is pretty gutless compared to any Tesla model. That may appeal to some people, but I like speeding; a lot.
> Can't have that, need regulations defining "responsible" AI.

Too bad they sacked their AI ethics department a while back.
There already exist local-search based algorithms that can find solutions way faster than a SAT solver can... Or they get completely stuck unable to make any progress.

All an LLM does is guess the next token based on the previous tokens and its training weights. For it to give you a solution to a large SAT problem it'll have to spit out a million character long binary string.

The likelyhood most of that string will be entirely hallucinated is very high. LLMs are not magic.

Deep Learning is already used internally in some SAT solvers to heuristically pick in which direction the search should go.
No, my complaint is your statement is misleading, because you were praising Europe's standardization and yet it did not include standard payment infrastructure and or require interoperability and therefore failed to create interoperable fast charging.

The video you linked to is not a result of that standardization, but of Tesla deciding to open its Supercharger network. They are doing this in US also despite not yet having a standard plug, so you could make the same video today in the US. The rollout of non-Tesla charging at Superchargers is more or less in the same state in both regions, so therefore the standard plug did not help.
He'd see those things if he paid any attention to user feedback, those have screenshots (though admittedly it's still be a bit too late of a notice)
Because the market for a sedan is drying up. People are looking for SUVs and people like me who we’re looking for an SUV in 2023, found themselves staring at 40-44k price tag for the same thing we got 4 years ago, for 31-33k. So after EV tax credit a model y is literally a no brainer.

It’s so ridiculous that I didn’t bother looking at Tesla at all in 2022. You are going to get out of your CRV, CX5, RAV4, Highlander, and straight into a model Y and it will feel like you went from a flip phone to an iPhone.
Not quite. Fuel is overtaxed there and very expensive, that's a bit different from Saudis,but combined with other factors mentioned by you and the fact most of their energy is green hydro, it makes sense to them to ditch ice when there's option to buy a new car
HP Plus prevents printer from using non-OEM ink for the life of the printer
We rarely get the kind of rain that's unpleasant to walk in. If you have a hat or jacket you'll be fine.
its not a matter of liking it. at least on desktop, its objectively, scientifically bad:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=E3gS9tjACwU
Their claim IS the data.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_Nine_Angles
> What was successful after Tesla and SpaceX?

Is Tesla and SpaceX not enough of a track record? Seriously, if that is not a track record of success, what is a track record of success by your measure?
White House: Everyone's talking about this AI thing. Do you think we should release a statement that we like it too?
Probably the best thing they've done in years.
> Where HTMX really shines is being able to bring the experience of writing React-like code without a nodejs environment.

FWIW, if that's all you're after, and you've mastered the Rust borrow checker, Yew (a React-like experience), or Leptos (a SolidJS-like experience) might be interesting to look at.
To stack overflow people: for the love of god please answer X before launching into your XY diatribe. People are on average not dumb, there's probably restraints preventing a solution to Y being workable.
> Where would the Twitter trolls go? They'd flood the streets.

Compare this argumentation with typical argumentation about violenceful computer games players which are also going to flood the streets for some different reasons but with similar unwanted outcomes.
Neuralink says it has the FDA’s OK to start clinical trials
> The biggest thing Tesla did was actually making it happen with vehicles that were significantly differentiated and looked like the future!

Tesla also invested in charging infrastructure - taking care of both the chicken and the egg.
Ford EVs will get access to Tesla’s Supercharger network in 2024
Hope it’s really that simple.
The small width on user trying to use it is inexcusable, but hiding is a nice option as in too many cases the scroll indicator is not very important to be that visible (it's cleaner UI, though that shouldn't be mandatory either)
The issue I have with the TOR browser (as an example of an actual real fork) is that they only stub away the APIs they know of, they don't really remove them and from time to time other methods of tracking glitch through; including all the fingerprinting requests when opening a fresh browser session.

I guess with a hard fork they couldn't keep up with upstream.

But honestly, I would totally be okay with a browser that doesn't have modern Web APIs because literally all of them from the last 10 years were just integrated to allow "appifying websites".

If I wanna see a fancy WebGL demo I can also use a temporary chrome, but my main browser should not have that amount of (unmaintained) attack surfaces.

All "forks" of Firefox usually aren't forks but just profiles with user.js configs. The only real fork of the engine itself is Pale Moon, and that project is a political shitshow and super outdated (which would be okay if it focussed on stability instead).
Some would view the development of megacorps and monopolies a negative, rather than a positive...
It doesn't feel like politics to me. More like marketing and economics.

A browser could theoretically be politically engaged by ensuring open web standards and accessibility etc. but this is not that, me thinks.
No, let's be real. The most basic human tasks have yet to be automated (like housekeeping or grocery cart parking lot fetching) because there is a long tail of edge cases and even novel scenarios that occur in even every day situations. It's why we don't have self driving cars at scale without remote or onsite human intervention capabilities, despite well-defined, algorithmic rules of the road. Most jobs are not well-defined / algorithmic and there is no amount of reading that can prepare you for the embodied, dynamic experience of performing those tasks.
I want a course that can simulate LLM using Small language model instead. It could run fast on a CPU machine, for the sake of learning.
They have a lot more power than any person. More power, more responsibility.
Oh, I missed that they started deploying them. All European superchargers have CCS.
> My model 3 does something scary at least a few times a month but I've never reported any.

Why not? The barrier of entry is pressing a button and then describing, in voice, what just happened.
Norway would much rather leverage their abundant hydro for domestic personal transport needs and just export their oil instead. That really isn’t ironic, just practical.
We've never done a whole planet adaption except for one iceage that almost wiped out humanity (down to about 1000 adults we think).

We've never done major adaptions with advanced economies

We've never done adaptations with 8bn people

We've never adapted this much this fast (it's a few 1000 times faster than previous ones).

And of course, every previous adaption has caused enormous amounts of pain and suffering and excess deaths etc. So let's not be too enthusiastic about it.

I think we have to adapt because that can (generally) be done locally, instead of needing global co-ordinated, action. But it will be really expensive. The question now is whether people can be convinced to give up Y luxury now so that X% of their children don't die in 2040+
So, cars are not technology? What about, I don't know, aircraft, power plants, ships, medical devices, laptops and phones (the hardware portion of those?

And which "tech" is top notch with Tesla, self driving? Their marketing is more than just incredibly good so.
Nah.

The court is pretty heavily Textualist and/or Originalist with Justice Thomas at the Originalist extreme and Justice Gorsuch at the Textualist extreme, but along the less Institutional axis you have Justices Thomas, Gorsuch and Alito and along the more Institutionalist end you have Chief Justice Roberts (at the extreme) and Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett.

The liberal Justices tend to get lumped together, but it’s worth noting a couple of details: the original formulation of the theory of the 3-3-3 court was with Justice Breyer who retired and was replaced by Justice Jackson. Justice Kagan is probably the most Institutionalist of these 3 and has always had an excellent rapport with the Federalist Society, Justice Sotomeyer in my estimation has always been the one most likely to defer to the Executive branch when they are a party to a case (but I formed that opinion during the Obama administration, it may not have aged well and I should re-examine it regardless) and I don’t feel confident in the slightest giving a good assessment of Justice Jackson without seeing more from her, I barely feel like we’ve seen enough from Justice Barrett and some think she might be more with the Thomas and Gorsuch end than with the Chief and Kavanaugh going by this current term which would make this a 4-2-3 court instead.

Long story short, it’s nuanced but all most people see is who appointed who and the final tally in cases with heavier partisan splits, but the manner in which a case was decided (the controlling opinion in other words) matters more for future jurisprudence than the judgement itself which is important primarily to the parties involved. Given a choice, Roberts pushes for cases to be decided as narrowly as possible, but that’s harder to do when he’s more likely to be the 6th vote than the 5th vote.
How does a link about a totally different car than the one being discussed prove your point?
People typically want to be able to peek behind the car while driving though.
Good to know, I'll take a look!
> "10-15 years ago, the basic idea was "P≠NP because otherwise computers could do crazy shit."

Everyone is downvoting you because that's not the mathematical explanation, but it's absolutely the informal explanation that the 'pop science' ones were saying.
You are missing the fact that html has very restricted list of events that can be defined in an attribute. Htmx allows to listen on any event, plus some extra features on top, such as event throttling, polling, synchronization between elements. Stylistically I can see the appeal of your proposal and even agree on some ways, but it's not functionally equivalent

https://htmx.org/attributes/hx-trigger/
https://htmx.org/attributes/hx-sync/
Lumen Researcher Interview Series: Professor Jon Penney