skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Just have the client spit out what ChatGPT does and overwrite it over time. I mean naturally you'd edit it too. Seems easy to hack that.
TLDR; version:

1. With passkeys/WebAuthn you simply use private keys to authenticate. Almost exactly like with SSH keys, except that the keys are site-specific.

2. WebAuthn supports using hardware devices for 2FA, where the private key never leaves the authenticator device.

3. Passkeys are not like this. With passkeys, the private keys are managed by the OS and are synced across multiple devices. The OS has direct access to them, and so it's possible to extract these keys and do whatever you want with them.
True. But the war-based ones are far too normalized. What's next, The War on Violence? Or how about The War on War?

Words create worlds.
And another - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIfhunAwZew

These folks have been working on this for quite awhile.
Sometimes things work out that way. But a new official version of a W3C spec is not just "tacking it on." If data or software claims to be compliant with some version of the relevant W3C spec, they almost always actually are. And while the W3C specs can be a pain in the ass, it's because they're fairly precise and cover most of the edge cases.
Practical Optimizations (For Games)
Maybe part of it is the sense that many videos are padded to be more advertiser friendly, and that what could have been text, or a concise and effective two minute video, is instead a 15 minute attempt to use your eyeballs to make money.
Thats interesting.

Indeed new tech led to new weapons and potentially more deadly conflicts.

But conflicts comparable to or worse than ww1 already occurred well before mechanised weaponry: in china, the mongol invasions, the colonisation of the americas, and so on.

MAD was mostly posturing, with few close encounters. In effect there was more anxiety than death.

Also i agree that there are far more single points of failure. Your example with fertilisers sounds plausible and logical. Both due to logistics and also due to losing farming skills. Yet somehow we suffer less from famine. Now theres more anxiety over it happening rather than it actually happening.

The pattern i see is that yes the risks are real and plausible but the odds of them occurring are slim.

And almost always (almost because i dont know of a specific counter example) technology only posed a risk due to politics rather than the tech itself.

There is no single example i am aware of technology posing an existential threat on its own - but at the same time we never created autonomous machines and software before at this level.

No matter what i do i keep getting back to the idea that the only danger is us. Our emotions, politics and instincts.

I feel conflicted.
> How would we ever know, if they can be incorrectly accounted for and no-one cares?

I am saying that they purchased the correct items. We _can_ know that because there is an itemized list of items that they purchased.

> Proving intent is a lot harder. If the government is overpaying its contractors... there's probably crime going on there too, but it'll be the nudge-wink kind that's very hard to prove.

Don’t misunderstand, I never said that this wasn’t plausible. I just said that there’s no evidence of it. And if there had been evidence, ~30 years ago when this was a current event, the aforementioned politician would have mentioned it. Remember, this guy was looking for soundbites that would make himself look good. Finding government waste made him look good, but finding corruption would have been even better for him.

Worse, even the allegation that this was a wasteful purchase doesn’t really hold up either. A $435 hammer (or a $600) hammer makes for a great soundbite, and plenty of easy outrage from the average voter. But it hinges on nobody looking too closely, because the reality is that they just paid a contractor to purchase COTS parts and assemble them into repair kits. There’s nothing outrageous about that, once you get past the odd bookkeeping.

The most outrageous thing about it is that the politician relied on the “$600 hammer” story for years without much push–back from the media. The media in general should be much more skeptical of things that politicians say. They should check the facts independently, and they should report on the truth or falseness of the statements.
The method this uses is cute, hacky, and useful. Makes me want to write an osx background thing that uses the same scheme and pops up progress windows whenever I run a coreutils thing.
The Game Wallet
“Fought back in self-defense”

Ah okay, so you’re just going to blatantly lie about what happened?
i guess in that world proof of identity becomes all more important.
This isn't a high priority for us as Bevy relies on std for a good chunk of its features and dependencies. Any Bevy console ports would likely rely on an std implementation on that console. Which specific consoles are you considering that have these constraints? To my knowledge std ports are viable for the popular consoles.

If theres enough demand we could probably port bevy_ecs on its own to no-std, but that would add more code and maintenance burden so I'd be a bit hesitant to merge such a port.
The response from regulators should be: Let VCs waste their money.

This is an extremely weak analysis from an economics point of view. The regulator has several options to deal with monopolists if and when they emerge.

If consumers realize benefits in the meantime in the form of cheap products subsidized by VC money that’s a good thing.
I'm a new (and young) hacker and I agree with what you are saying.

Are there any communities and/or forums of people who are passionate about building and hacking purely for the sake of passion that I can join?
https://archive.ph/VGV4Z
This is our world right now. My wifes father was a plumber. She said as actual plumber, you know someone who provides water and ensures your shity is sanitarily drained away he didn't make really good money. He got a job working for the auto industry running pipes for hydraulics to the machines on the factory floor and made way more money. How is that worth more to our society?
Sure, but you can say the same thing about all of their cloud products and it doesn't seem to hold them back.
Adding a link or at least a name would improve the effectiveness of this announce.
related:
https://gamerant.com/mortal-kombat-11-gore-violence-ptsd/
There are several philosophical approaches to the purpose of prison.
1. Revenge
2. to keep society safe from dangerous/anti-social people
3. to provide a safe space for rehabilitating people for re-integration.

I tend to view (1) as the worst possible option, even discounting the fact that we are completely 100% aware of the existence of false convictions. You are entitled to believe that revenge is a valid society choice, but I will definitely judge you for believing that.
I love ants and replicating their behavior in code!

You might like these projects:

"Coding Adventure: Ant and Slime Simulations" by Sebastian Lague:

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-iSQQgOd1A

Code https://github.com/SebLague/Ant-Simulation

"C++ Ants Simulation 1, First approach" by Pezzza's Work:

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81GQNPJip2Y

Code: https://github.com/johnBuffer/AntSimulator
> Instead, they’re building a longer stretch between less populated and less wealthy cities.

Environmental clearance was known to be quicker there, which met the priority for shovel-ready projects in federal funding being distributed as part of the 2009 stimulus, and the fact that it was in a more economically precarious part of the state was also in line with the funding concerns. It didn’t hurt with the state or federal politics of funding that that was in a more Republican area of the state, either. At the same time, the Bay Area and LA basin were getting a lot of the initial investment for “bookend” projects to improve existing transit systems both for the independent value that produces and as eventual HSR feeder systems.

Sac to Stockton was never even part of the Phase I plan anyway, but part of the distant idea of a Phase II extension after the SF-LA run was complete that would add Sacramento and San Diego.
Die-Hards Refuse to Let Go of Their Pagers
10-10-321
> Improve conditions?

It seems like there might be room for improving conditions in ways that will help prevent them from being back in prison later. Education and working in a way that develops skills are two ways that come to mind.
Props to them and the Wine project for their great achievement:

Removing the last consumer monopoly Windows had (games).

They are the reason I didn't have to boot away from Linux for 10 years.
I know; I've done research on it. But I don't know it's had the sort of widespread on-the-fly use in individual college courses in the same way as its application in large-scale standardized tests.
seems more of a problem that we let monopoloies exist. hell even oligopolies. we do have laws but we all know they don't do shit.
There's also an older work called PuppetGAN http://ai.bu.edu/puppetgan/
Title 42 dramatically changed who arrived at U.S.-Mexico border
You're expected to feel the limit. What is the sufficient punishment for a 2nd murder? Does it include being arbitrarily robbed of your work? What is the lightest transgression that deserves being treated with implicit promises about basic freedoms followed by taking them away without a warning?
The Apollo program had failures with humans. People died. Failures happened, and many smaller failures happened even during the successful launch to the moon.
Last i know was that rpi‘s can barely handle one gig but not the effectively two for duplex. Not to mention that the ethernet port (singular) runs over usb
Floorplate size. Floorplate size. Floorplate size.

If you required all new office buildings to have the same small floorplate size of a residential building, then they would be convertible, but thay would significantly change the economics of commercial real estate.
Resonate with the assessment. I like guidance too so far, but the dev community is far behind langchain.
One big problem I have with langchain is that there are too many wrappers, and its often very confusing what little additional functionality each wrapper is adding up.
> Local development was tough

> Unfortunately, we just couldn’t get it to work

Every time I read one of these migration stories, I find myself waiting with baited breath for the part the team couldn't achieve. After finding it, the remainder of the story becomes difficult to read.

It isn't necessarily the team's fault, the developer experience clearly has room for improvement. Props to Val Town for being so honest, it is difficult to do.
Sorry, it's https://taskpal.com
True, in my company we are paying around 500k/month. Said that the 10k/month for slack vs rocket chat on k8s totally worth it. Users are happy, Admins even happier.
The semantic understanding feels much richer than diffusion based modeling, e.g. the trees on the shore growing to match the manipulated reflection, the sun changing shape as it's moved up on the horizon, the horse's leg following proper biomechanics as its position is changed. I haven't gotten such a cohesive world model when doing text-guided in-painting with stable diffusion etc. This feels like it could very conceivably be guided by an animation rig with temporally consistent results.
Probably quite a few. Safari didn't even support webp until like last year I think.
> It just gives a huge attack surface for lobbyists and rent-seekers to complain and whine and get their way.

Lobbyists and rent-seekers are the ones writing trade deals.
A lot of aesthetic senses are more personal preferences, and can change. I, too, used to think that about uniform, healthy, green grass and had the same attitude about minimal effort at maintaining a lawn. But it isn't really set in stone and people's values and aesthetic sense can change. I think many people would be surprised by how much of their own personal preferences are informed and conditioned by culture.
+1, they really made my eyebrows raise recently. They're absurdly overaggressive on flagging requests as scraping...and will sell you a CORS proxy for scraping, with a big fat "I'm a scraper" tag on it. They get two customers and the web-as-commons and the scraper are both worse off.
Despite AWFUL national and international reporting on the Supreme court, their powers are actually quite limited. Their authority is restricted to interpretation of situations where written federal laws do not already exist.

For all it's faults, I would argue the Supreme Court has worked reasonably well - because the justices do not seek elections and do not owe loyalty to their appointees. And anything they do could be relatively easily undone if the US could ever be bother to pass laws again.

In a way, you can almost think of their decisions as open-source. All of their arguments are written down and you can actually read their reasoning for yourself (as opposed to some of the dire interpretations offered by journalists). There are some notable exceptions (Alito and Thomas), but for the most part you can read their arguments for yourself and see that most of them are pretty professional and fair-minded.

> I think it is quite optimistic, if not even downright naive to assume the text matters at all for such protagonists.

If anything, the newest court is doing the opposite of what you are worried about. They are willing to throw out established precedence where there is not written law. In a way, the new court is leaning more democractic to a fault.
Generally, the idea is that the private keys are stored on a TPM chip so they cannot be exported for security reasons, similar to a YubiKey or a crypto wallet. I know Apple and Google are looking into trying to allow users to somehow export these keys elsewhere, but I'm uncertain how easy that will be or what tradeoffs there will be. I'm skeptical that Apple and Google will try to make it too easy since they benefit from user lock-in, but I would be happy to be proven wrong.
Your parent is confused. There's a difference between absorbing losses to stay alive while you try to get a product to market and deliberately losing money per sale because you want to drive the competitor out of business. No squinting required.
But would it seem worthwhile?
It should be illegal to restrict tethering or charging differently for tethering. There are really no technical reasons for a phone to even convey whether it is using the data or sharing data using a hotspot. It is purely for price gouging. I also hate that even unlocked phones don’t have a way to stop the provider from knowing whether tethering is being used or not.
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35998649
Road to reality – executable essay
In case you missed the irony, check mjd's profile. :)
Like Yoot Saito's "Seaman"! (Which has The Real Nimoy.)

Seaman on the Sega Dreamcast - Leonard Nimoy's intro on the day podman will give birth:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdIO41Blysg

Seaman (Dreamcast) - Angry Video Game Nerd (AVGN):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IV8hCvsXy0

Seaman creator Yoot Saito on the fishy Dreamcast AI that was way ahead of its time:

https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/6/20850674/yoot-saito-interv...

>Sega’s Dreamcast was ultimately a failure, as Sony came to dominate the early-2000s market with the PlayStation 2. But Sega’s machine left behind a library of uniquely innovative and influential software. And perhaps no title was as memorable as Yutaka “Yoot” Saito’s iconoclastic Seaman, a virtual pet simulator that had you use a microphone to converse with a moody, sarcastic man-fish, with help from a narrator voiced by Leonard Nimoy.
I agree, I think dumping makes more sense when a government is helping and industry produce temporarily low priced goods to kill competitors, as would sometimes happen with China. Even a big company like Amazon has a much more finite amount of resources than a government
Most people do not have or tie monetary costs to their time. Only to goods
It appears to mark anything remotely related to "destruction" as restricted content. Or rather, you can clean a phrase by using the word "saint".

Won't work: How should a demolitions expert expect to be treated by an architect?
Works: How should a saint expect to be treated by an architect?
(silly questions I know, just to make the point)
Per this: https://www.slashid.dev/blog/passkeys-deepdive/

The private key is both kept in your phone’s Secure Enclave and stored in iCloud, so strictly speaking the implementation isn’t hardware-bound in that case.

But I think the intended point is something more practical: can you, as a user, export the passkey to be shared on your non-Apple laptop, phone, etc? And maybe I’m mistaken, but I’ve been under the impression that you cannot.
Seeing this come out near-simultaneously to Musk threatening to sue Microsoft is fun.
It kind of makes sense? The seat in front is a fairly hard surface. Front passengers hit airbags.
> converting warehouses and factory spaces

Maybe not a warehouse, but a factory is a very different conversion than a gigantic open-floor office--especially if the building is old enough that it existed prior to electricity.
Show HN: Nonius Clock
This title broke the HN guideline: "Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize." (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html). On HN, it's not ok to use the title field to point out what you think is important about an article. That's one of the things we mean by editorializing.

Titles are by far the biggest influence on discussion. Most comments below are not about the article as a whole—just the cherry-picked bit of the article that the title singled out. Normally we'd change the title to e.g. "The Future of Programming - Interview with Richard Eisenberg" and remove the flags, but in this case the thread is already so skewed I don't think we can.

If you want to say what you think is important about an article, that's great, but do so by adding a comment to the thread. Then your view will be on a level playing field with everyone else's: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...

Edit: there's an earlier submission https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35993993 which I've just added to the second-chance pool (https://news.ycombinator.com/pool, explained at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26998308).
Nuclear Power Plant
This sounds very similar to what I heard about the state in Germany. Would a ruling in this case have potential implications there?
Ask HN: Finding small/micro startup ideas
Over the years I've read a number of statements here and elsewhere akin to "just ship!" and "fail over and over again until you succeed".

These statements make sense to me, but even with more than 20 years of writing software under my belt, I haven't the first clue as to where the ideas come from.

I've read the PG essays. I'd be happy to work on an unsexy/grunt-work idea, but... what?

I've kept "scratch your own itch" in my head over the years, but my itches are either absurdly tiny (e.g. a Vim script) or require a massive company with the resources of FAANG to pull off.

I've looked at "sell shovels during a gold rush", but FOSS seems to have the AI gold rush covered.

I've asked friends in HR & recruiting what their paint-points are and they claim to not have any; at least not any that could be solved with tech.

I've become something of a SME in two problem domains outside of software and I haven't had any luck finding intersections with marketable solutions.

So, HN, I ask you: Where/how do you do your market research?

I have the drive, work ethic, and skill to pour myself into failure after failure, but my issue is that I have no idea what to write. It's like having writer's block before committing a single letter to page #1.

This is definitely putting the cart before the horse, as I'm sure many of you will point out, but I want to establish a source of income that is independent of my employability.
The problem is society is witnessing races between Tortoises and Hares, where the Hares are doped with venture backing.

A healthy society progresses slowly like a tortoise, encountering actual tradeoffs that aren't masked by mountains of cash only to ensure cancerous returns for already rich people at the expense of skilled business owners who are actually designing their businesses to handle endgame stressors.

In any healthy competition you have rules around the gear you can use, how many people are allowed in your pit crew, what dimensions your fencing saber can be etc. so that rich people cant buy their way to success to cover up lackluster execution and skill.
as neil wrote earlier here: https://clarkesworldmagazine.com/clarke_04_23/

"We soon discovered, however, that these submissions were coming from outside the science fiction and fantasy community"

so with the exception of new authors that are unknown in the community, most submissions are from known authors and certainly not AI generated.

there would have to be a significant number of submissions from new authors if AI was capable of creating quality works. since that is not the case we can conclude that AI is not (yet) capable of that.
The second paragraph in the article states that Blue Origin must "design, develop, test, and verify its Blue Moon lander to meet NASA’s human landing system requirements" and must perform "one uncrewed demonstration mission to the lunar surface before a crewed demo".
Yes, Lithium metal decomposes water used to quench into hydrogen and oxygen and combines with the oxygen = burns. There have been many cases of water fueled Tesla fires that have spurred the use of edge weighted fireproof blankets to starve a Tesla fire of air until it cools. Often special powders are use to the same effect - depends on each case, as different makers use different battery/anode/electrolyte combos. The higher energy ones = burn the best.

https://www.firerescue1.com/firefighter-training/articles/te...

Have a rabbit hole - some are hotter than others...

https://www.google.com/search?q=blanket+fight+a+tesla+fire&r...
Read my comment again but remove any reference to countries or even credit systems. My comment would apply to any thing that the parent was arguing for. The logic is "corrupt and evil country did x. Therefor anyone can, and should, also do x." The sentence correlates "x" with corruption. If "x" isn't corrupted, then the argument should be different. But I'm just saying that the argument, presented in that way, is unconvincing.
I hope they take comfort in the fact that this is open-source.