skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> but it sounds like you just cannot use the ink purchased with the subscription?

There's the rub.

Instant Ink is not a subscription to ink. It's a subscription to printed pages, and HP merely provides the ink as a vehicle to deliver the printed pages.

> Presumably, you can buy ink somewhere else and it will work?

Yes. You can still buy normal ink cartridges that you will own outright and can use however you like.
These are the similar projects I've come across:

- [GitHub - e-johnstonn/BriefGPT: Locally hosted tool that connects documents to LLMs for summarization and querying, with a simple GUI.](https://github.com/e-johnstonn/BriefGPT)

- [GitHub - go-skynet/LocalAI: Self-hosted, community-driven, local OpenAI-compatible API. Drop-in replacement for OpenAI running LLMs on consumer-grade hardware. No GPU required. LocalAI is a RESTful API to run ggml compatible models: llama.cpp, alpaca.cpp, gpt4all.cpp, rwkv.cpp, whisper.cpp, vicuna, koala, gpt4all-j, cerebras and many others!](https://github.com/go-skynet/LocalAI)

- [GitHub - paulpierre/RasaGPT: RasaGPT is the first headless LLM chatbot platform built on top of Rasa and Langchain. Built w/ Rasa, FastAPI, Langchain, LlamaIndex, SQLModel, pgvector, ngrok, telegram](https://github.com/paulpierre/RasaGPT)

- [GitHub - imartinez/privateGPT: Interact privately with your documents using the power of GPT, 100% privately, no data leaks](https://github.com/imartinez/privateGPT)

- [GitHub - reworkd/AgentGPT: Assemble, configure, and deploy autonomous AI Agents in your browser.](https://github.com/reworkd/AgentGPT)

- [GitHub - deepset-ai/haystack: Haystack is an open source NLP framework to interact with your data using Transformer models and LLMs (GPT-4, ChatGPT and alike). Haystack offers production-ready tools to quickly build complex question answering, semantic search, text generation applications, and more.](https://github.com/deepset-ai/haystack)

- [PocketLLM « ThirdAi](https://www.thirdai.com/pocketllm/)

- [GitHub - imClumsyPanda/langchain-ChatGLM: langchain-ChatGLM, local knowledge based ChatGLM with langchain ｜ 基于本地知识库的 ChatGLM 问答](https://github.com/imClumsyPanda/langchain-ChatGLM)
> thereby not addressing the issue at a fundamental level

This is true for almost everything politicians promote as a "solution"

> f literally remains unchanged with each interaction

For now, on a model weights level, sure. But we have no insights into the random seed, chain of calls, or external inputs that may be included. f may be thought of to include much more than "just the model", even today. The ChatGPT is making multiple API calls, one of which is the moderation endpoint after the completion call on the client side. So for most people, they actually see g which is something like g(f(H)))

For example, ChatGPT plugins change the game, as do the embedding databases and other attempts to deal with limited context.
It should be downvoted because no reference was given. People need to be very cautious of accepting unsourced figures and facts.
That's a significant group of people for sure, but I'd add two more groups:

- A group that think GDPR = cookie law and there's nothing more written in it. Never any discussion about, say, forcing companies to report a data breach within 72h of detection. Or about being able to download your data, or forcing a company to remove your data, or...

- A group that think passing a new law = everyone is going to comply immediately and one random website that they know of that doesn't comply but wasn't sued yet into submission = GDPR was a mistake.
I meant recv_multishot not multishot_accept. The one I linked does use multishot_accept. Just a think-o. Looks like your version uses both though, so that's cool.
No. Anyone who wants to sell or lease subdivided land has to prove that. Not only that, but if the development gets water from Scottsdale, then it does not have to prove a 100 year reserve.

Scottsdale is confident, (or, at least, shows outward confidence), in its ability to provide water for 100 years because of its three pillars. One, that the Salt River gambit will always pay off. Two, that Scottsdale's water from the Colorado will never run dry. And three, that if all else fails, I mean, hey, Phoenix is sitting on an ocean. They can't leave us out high and dry can they?

With respect to two and three, we had zero confidence. Additionally, our faith in the ability of Scottsdale's leaders to effectively manage unexpected events with 1 was, limited.

I'm not saying move out of Scottsdale. I'm saying for us, it was too much risk and inconsistent with sustainability. I believe for a place like Scottsdale to become sustainable, somebody has to move out. Not saying who that should be, but mother nature is clearly signaling limits on our growth ambitions. Not all places in Arizona are unsustainable. Tuscon, Sedona, Phoenix proper. Etc. There are lots of places in Arizona that I think have put forth credible plans to manage their growth in the face of uncertain water security. But climate, geography and a failure to get out in front of the issue long ago has just put other areas in a precarious spot. That's just reality.
Oh, definitely. But there's a part of me that continues to want to see that commented out code in the current code as a reminder or something. Yeah, it's not rational.
There is no moat, according to Google

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35813322
Is it possible to build a system where nobody owns private property but is happy?
Very unlikely but theoretically possible.

Main problem is that current ruling class is mostly comprised of psychopaths and what they actually mean is that “We will own everything, you will own nothing, and you will be happy or else!”

I think “You will own nothing, and be happy” can be utopic but we will first need to eliminate genes that cause psychopathy first.
Yes, in a commercial setting. It's somewhat complicated as a stack, but when everything plays together, it's low latency, good quality, flexible and scalable across regions.

Only downside in my experience: cross device video never works?
Good luck making a video call with chrome + firefox + android clients in the same room.
Wistron has has a rough history, including underpaying/withholding pay from employees[1]. Good riddance.

[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-says-wistron-on-probat...
and Linux has had POSIX async IO since 2003

(which no-one uses either because the API doesn't compose well onto existing application structures)
How would suppressing the competition cut costs?

>Shay Assad: The landscape has totally changed. In the '80s, there was intense competition amongst a number of companies. And so the government had choices. They had leverage. We have limited leverage now.
As someone who considers himself an old school hacker, I'm anti-power and anti-establishment by my very nature.

The WEF, G7, G20, etc, are powers' playground. And "mainstream altruism" is almost always terrifying to me as an individual.

I don't consider myself a libertarian by any means, but I think modern society does need to give more credence to the individual.
Is that a serious question?

You asked if someone could ask ChatGPT how to make meth from common ingredients. Very inappropriate by itself and completely off topic. With the bonus of a dismissive comment on the limitation that ChatGPT needs a phone number per account to limit bots. So actually this would be rather 4chan than reddit to me, or did you really think a interesting discussion would evolve out of this?
Washing machines/dryers are commonly rented in the US, especially in places where there isn't a long expected tenancy like apartments near campuses or other young-adult-heavy places. Fridges sometimes, but much less frequently. Save both the cost of the appliance plus the hassle of dealing with taking it cross country if you move far and were otherwise able to fit all your shit in a car.

> "a provider that would also service and upgrade"

The "and upgrade" part is a pure fantasy, though. Never seen one of those give you the good stuff!
I don't think black holes are what is being described here, but no, it would not fundamentally be all that different from a binary system orbiting around a shared center of gravity between the two objects.
0, but

That’s in terms of technology

Their brands are still very powerful

Anyone can sell sugary drinks, but there is only one CocaCola
Well, yes Cox objectively sucks. But to your point, someone offers internet connectivity in your area with an SLA; the question is at what cost and how much a backhoe might be involved.
> stored in a constant in a C header

i think this is just because a loader isn't included and that's the minimum example. in a real project you'd write your own code to load the compiled bytecode from somewhere else (external storage, or fetch from server, or w/e).

i.e., here's an interpreter you can bolt onto your firmware codebase. it has no dependencies and makes no assumptions.
> software evolution is constrained by organizational stability and the ability of developers to understand the system

Simple is better than magic and code documentation is required.

Side note: "loop over items and save each" isn't a useful comment right before a for loop. That isn't what I'm talking about. However, "We have to call this API one-at-a-time synchronously because otherwise their internal WAF will block us if we issue parallel requests" is very helpful context when the obvious improvement to the code is multiple threads/async I/O.
There is an obvious typo in the article. ChatGPT (i.e. GPT 3.5) has 175 billion parameters, no 175 million.
I remember a Phillip K Dick story set in the future in which the characters in the story kept having to insert coins into their various household appliances to make them work. Not quite the same, but similar.
Under what circumstances would Wikipedia shit down, if it still has money for operational expenses?

The biggest set of responsibilities charites I didn't list is sales (aka donations). But Wikipedia doesn't do more good work (as donors think of it) the more money they get. It doesn't scale up much that way.
Wait -- why is this story "[flagged]"?
This blog post reads like it's written by someone using Subversion back in 2015. Most of the justification for committing on mainline can be addressed by following other best practices:

1. Run the same suite tests additional quality checks (linters, etc) on PR branches that you run on mainline

2. Run branch CI against the merge commit for your PR branch (i.e. include your changes as well as latest mainline)

3. Avoid long-lived branches.

If you run into frequent merge conflicts and incompatible changes in an area of your codebase such that your team needs to integrate individual commits every half-hour instead of keeping 1-4 day feature branches around... That sounds like a code and/or organizational smell.

However!

> Using pull requests for code changes by your own team members is like having your family members go through an airport security checkpoint to enter your home. It’s a costly solution to a different problem.

I actually do like this analogy -- but it's not PRs that are the problem, it's mandatory reviews. And the cost/benefit of mandatory reviews varies widely depending on how senior the engineers on the team are, how much their work overlaps, and what their average tenure on the team is.
Ye I have avoided Reddit for a year or two now and meanwhile Karen now covers 30-ish yo nurses? Worse than the slide of 'literary'. I give up :/
"Announced at today's ISC23 keynote, the Aurora genAI model is going to be trained on General text, Scientific texts, Scientific data, and codes related to the domain."

So this thing doesn't actually exist yet?
I think the one who will be milked by the chinese are the russians, for stupidly making themselves dependent upon the one major power that will deal with them. Chinese government must be drooling.
Good point, there is more content than just discussing the series.
Would you settle for Rodgers and Hammerstein provided that the piece is largely a series of musical numbers?
Filling in the cracks: Japan’s shifting perspective on disability employment
Cool, thanks for clarifying. :)
I don't know enough about the history of funding theoretical physics research to comment on that one way or another. However, neither did the comment I was replying to reference any actual facts about the distribution of funding that might suggest any of them had been wasted.

The fact is, we have no falsifiable theories that can unite GR and QM. Should every theory be abandoned that doesn't quickly lead to a resolution? No, clearly not. So the question is what kind of criteria we could use to determine that string theory is a dead end or is otherwise stifling true progress.

And that's pretty much what I was trying to ask previously... is ST actually sucking all the air out of the room? I'm a layperson and not just going to assume that hundreds of experts have blown their careers doing pointless calculations on a theory that "obviously" isn't worth the resources put into it. But the comment I replied to seemed to be making that assumtpion,
Optimists always over play their hand.

Convincing people in cities to not own cars would be the biggest win any of these global orgs can achieve. It is still likely impossible. But, it is an easier sell.

Convincing people to use shared spaces instead of having their own lawns or shared parking instead of a garage is similarly a valuable goal. Both would be big steps in the 'own nothing' direction. It can easily be sold on its own. NYCers would choose an massive central park over a sq-ft each of private garden space any day.

But these people have to try selling the most dystopian framing of such policy decisions, and the baby gets thrown out with the bath water.
GDPR states, "The storage limitation principles state that you should keep personal data for as long as the purpose is unfulfilled"

Seems like FB was storing a little bit more than just social graph and for a bit longer.
Schrems I was 2013, which you'll note is 3 years before the US 2016 election and the covid-19 pandemic which are the two factors that really raised the tempo around the misinformation discussion. It's also 3 years before GDPR was passed, relying on earlier european privacy law and being largely driven by private citizen campaigns (including Europe vs Facebook).

So while the contemporary US discussion is far more dominated by elderly consuming political content, that doesn't mean nobody cared about privacy. You just need to see the furor about Cambridge Analytica or the Snowden leaks to see that that is a concern.
It started with George Bush senior. He basically undid the optimistic conservatism of Reagan (small government, favor individual liberty, Constitutional originalism...), and reverted to his own just-play-to-win style that gave us Dick Cheney and Neoconservatism.

Trump's populist tribalism stuck the knife into the conservative movement. The heart's still beating, but it's faint.
It transpired through your writing. I must say that it was a really good writeup.
I don't think it is. I think if someone says they have a computer, it needs to be a computer, not a very large slide rule. The same applies to "breakthroughs" and "milestones": a non-quantum computer is never a breakthrough in quantum computers the same way a slide rule isn't in computers.

I think we're talking in circles, I just don't get how anyone can take these things seriously...
Yes, it does seem like it's concept stage.
It’s noble to want to help the poor but the economy isn’t zero sum in that way.

Almost all the surplus we have could be traced back to our discoveries in physics leading to machines.

People lived much much poorer lives without modern physics discoveries.

The expects return on physics is so great we should find ways to afford more long shot experiments not less.
I did LSD once in the depth of grief where I was having trouble processing the loss of multiple family members. I went in with a "roll up your sleeves and clear out the garbage" mindset and it had an incredibly profound effect. Other times it was just fun, though I've also found elusive solutions to problems I've been working on, similar to dreaming.
In practice, even a loud engine is practically silent until it passes in front of you.
It's a typo in the article. GPT-3.5 is 175bn parameters, not 175 million.

GPT-4 does not have publicly available parameter count, but is thought to have something similar to 1tn.
Would be great if this was integrated into runtimes like tokio. I can totally see graphs of promise chains being translated to calls to io_uring representing the underlying data dependencies and thus saving lots of overhead context switches.

Pretty cool to see how far IO APIs have come with this.
Ukraine is losing 10k drones a month to Russian electronic-warfare systems
Faster than expected.
Too much wisdom in those paragraphs!
Will certainly have an eye out for the refurbished options. Usually I'm also a very happy with Dells, and one of the most powerfull laptops I've had the chance of working with was an old Latitude (those with a purple finish) and boy it was a beast.

The chrome books seem like a nice path as well.

I'd love to lear more about the nomenclature/model codes that the main manufacturers use. I had no idea "7"s were the reliable ones :D
Well HP also doesn't make you burn all the pages already printer right? They just don't let you print new pages with a cartridge you didn't pay for.

This would be easier to understand if you had to return the cartridge after cancellation, but they probably figured it's cheaper to let you throw it away.
Airline workers at the gate use similar terminals, and they're astonishingly fast at using them - rerouting passengers, checking flight openings, etc.
And I'm sure Americans own the businesses and land in Mexico making use of most of the water.
Flagship customers often do this to vendors. They know that "Apple is our customer" is a big selling point, so they turn the screws tight and make the vendor serve them for no margin.
> In psychology there is a definite boundary between individual behavioral dynamics and population behavioral dynamics.

I'm aware of my own behavior as an individual being influenced by social context, is that not the kind of bleed over you might look for? Maybe you're referring to specific concepts I'm not actually even understanding.
You can find some "hello-world" style examples here, along with fantastic tutorial materials:

https://unixism.net/loti/tutorial/index.html
This is a hysterical take given that China, next to India, is the single largest polluter on the planet and continually refuses to have anything to do with the West's obsession with climate change.
This sounds like outright coping. As far as I can tell (having paid next to no attention to this conflict), the media got the entire invested US population hyped up about some Ukrainian counter-offensive, retaking Bakhmut, Russian army out of ammo...and this is the result? Spinning the loss of the city while realizing the aftermath was near as makes no difference a human woodchipper?

I really hope we have an Iraq-style mea culpa over this conflict very soon, because far too many people are up to their chins in moral hazard by walking straight into the fog of war equipped with only talking-head propaganda and Hollywood-informed notions of how and why wars are fought.
You can decide to hold long enough for the rate to go from short term to long term capital gains, which is something you can’t do with an unqualified dividend. There is also a limit to the amount of unqualified dividends you can offset with losses, which isn’t true for capital gains.
Sure, like the US government can break any other international contract they signed. This just would not help with further trust. There is something called international law, despite there is no world government. But states are still subject to rules, or else they will isolate themself.
Beacon API
I am an anti-platonist but still think its reasonable to say one discovered a mathematical fact. All this amounts to is discovering that you can reach a sentence in a formal language using the rules of the language and the axioms. One can believe that a recipe for pancakes exists without believing it does so via participating in an unseen ideal world.
Wouldn't that mean it is just more useful in mathematical reality but less useful in physical reality?
Good advice that more generally amounts to Chesterton's fence:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Chesterton%27s_fence
Prompts are not fit for purpose
How does Phoenix manage to store water?
I also thought it was curious. There is a wide range of possibilities for this.

My favorite hypothesis is that OpenAI was navigating the unknown open sea trying to answer the question "Is it possible to achieve this?" without knowing if they would ever find a new land.

The rest of them already know the answer is "Yes it is" so it's not an unknown open sea anymore with a dubious destination. They know it's possible, it's just a matter of money and time. They probably hired whatever engineer was available, and they paid tons of money to come up with a competitive product.
"matter of a few months" / "on par offerings"... My (very very) limited impression is both of those statements aren't fair. Google/intel/etc have been working on lots of AI-related projects, even LLM efforts over years. It's not like any of these companies are bootstrapping LLMs or just posted their first AI engineer job a few months ago.

I also don't think I'd call what they're offering "on par" with GPT-4. They're competitive, or impressive substitutes, but my personal tests of Bard at least aren't getting me as useful results as GPT-4.

Source: too lazy to look up any. this is just my lame impression. feel free to downvote.
Any such post is immediately flagged and dissapears. Actually it does not have to be in favor of Russia, it is enough that you contest "facts" as they are presented in the western media.

First hand experience.
Clinical Trial of mRNA Universal Influenza Vaccine Candidate Begins
Governance of Superintelligence
I think that was different. Both Hitler and Stalin were emotionally obsessed with the idea of controlling Stalingrad at all cost and didn’t think rationally about it.

The argument here is that Russia is in the same boat, but Ukraine is acting rational and think this is the place where they have the best odds at winning the war. The ratio of “their losses” versus “our losses” is better for them than they can get elsewhere, and at the rate of progress Russia made, they won’t run out of land soon.

Of course, whether they’re right isn’t 100% certain. From what I read, Russia is losing relatively more inexperienced soldiers than Ukraine, and those are relatively easy to replace.
I'm still hoping for a CRDT implementation with robust, thoroughly tested libraries for both Python and JavaScript that can talk to each other - I want to run Python on the server and JavaScript in the client and keep the two in sync with each other.

Closest I've seen to that is automerge but the Python version doesn't appear to be actively maintained or packaged for PyPI yet: https://github.com/automerge/automerge-py

UPDATE: It looks like this might be what I'm after: https://github.com/y-crdt/ypy
>"productive, what? Revolution?"

Since when productive means Revolution? Productive in my book means forming new party with the proper platform and winning the election. Meanwhile protests against most egregious actions will do.

>"It will also lead to a large loss of life. There's also no guarantee what happens after will be positive."

That had never stopped the US from instigating and supporting numerous revolutions and coups.