skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is the plot of “The Congress” with Robin Wright as herself.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1821641/
Only if we assume Knuth clicks 'agree' to T&Cs without reading them.
Hearing that they dabbled in crypto and AI makes me wonder if being privacy-focused was another such trend.

Ironically, if you're signed out of Google, it likely has better privacy than smaller, privacy-focused search engines because they have much tighter internal data and IT controls.
I know folks hate the centralization of identity management to the big identity providers, but as AI gets better and better at defeating captcha it's going to get harder and harder for the small, independent ones to operate reliably and securely.
For REALLY old games PCEM works but for later games (think generation half life 2+) it becomes very tedious to work with VMs, especially when you have to do GPU Passthrough
What else is it used for? I have an ENS domain and that's pretty much the use case I've seen so far.

If your ENS domain's use case is so obscure that most don't get it, then maybe you need to modify the use case.
>I know I must of committed crimes recently due to the state of our labyrinthine system

Well hey good news, the cameras are automated now and they know all the crimes.
The question is not whether it has a particular view of the world or not. It is quite clear that ChatGPT has a liberal political bias. I think the question that we should ask is if this bias was intentionally introduced by OpenAI (with RLHF or otherwise) or if it ocurred naturally given the training material, assuming the internet and academia in general have a liberal bias to begin with.
You also need a license to use them and have to abide by various laws and regulations, which are literally limiting factors.
I think it has more to do with the event driven nature of nginx vs the thread per connection nature of Apache.
I see no real benefit to this. The x86 compatibility doesn't get in the way in any modern architecture - all the 16/32 bit mode stuff is all 'emulated' with microcode, and there are no dedicated 16 bit registers anymore...

Nor does it get in the way of software - as soon as you've switched to 64 bit mode, you can ignore all legacy stuff.

Thats the right way to maintain legacy compatibility - make sure it is all contained and doesn't get in anyone's way, and you can leave it there forever.
"Gfycat is currently owned by Snapchat." (Wikipedia.)

Edit: That appears to have been incorrectly removed by someone who was probably reading my comment.

News of Snap Inc acquiring Gfycat can be seen here:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/gfycat/about/

> Gfycat (acquired by Snap Inc)

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/meta-fights-overturn-uk-order... (Reuters, april 2022)

> Snap later acquired Gfycat, a competitor to Giphy.

https://www.adweek.com/social-marketing/meta-loses-tribunal-... (oct 2022)

> and Snap, which owns Gfycat.
In German its Föhn which can be written as Foehn
Using Hammerspoon to Switch Apps
Sundar was the lead PM on Chrome (before it even released).
The ARM architecture was introduced in 1985 and the first real shipping product, the Acorn Archimedes, in 1987.
Thanks for your questions.

> Can you explain the reputation system a bit more?

While it's still at the conceptual stage, the reputation system would be a generalization of a system called "web of trust" in the original Freenet [1].

> Is all content in freenet public or how would you know that someone posted certain content?

It depends on the system. For example, something like a forum might have minimum reputation requirements for posting, and also the requirement that the forum can downvote your reputation if you behave badly - this being the punishment.

> Do other users actively have to "down vote" them to reduce their reputation or is there an entity which can influence reputation?

It's a decentralized mechanism so it's all based on user feedback, but with web of trust it's transitive, so downvoting you may also downvote those who endorsed your reputation.

But bots can also participate, for example a bot could use modern deep learning to identify objectionable material and downvote automatically.

> Is there are single global reputation system or is it more local?

It's a mixture - trust is transitive so proximity matters but it isn't just about your immediate trust relationships.

[1] https://freesocial.draketo.de/wot_en.html
The E-Sports World Is Starting to Teeter
One good thing that has come out is the acceleration in acceptance of electric cars, battery tech, and charging network. I also don't think NASA would have outsourced anything without the developments of Space X.
NASA to put people through the Kraken machine
> Is this a reality though?

Most certainly in the age of the gig economy. Even my own partner has about 4 different jobs now - as a registered nurse. They don't necessarily add up to a massive number of hours a week but she'd no doubt prefer not to have to jump back and forth between so many employers, each with their own set of expectations and management styles etc.
But she'd have to settle for a pretty crumby base salary for any sort of full time position.
Because it's the most basic use. In a single prompt you can have the LLM serve up relevant bits covering multiple perspectives, contrast and compare the perspectives, analyze their effectiveness in a given problem domain, and then produce meaningful output towards a solution. Information retrieval is just step 1.

Consider a prompt like the following:

"Given the task: 'TASK GOES HERE', break it down into intermediate steps or 'thoughts'. Consider multiple different reasoning paths that could be taken to solve the task. Explore these paths individually, reflecting on the possible outcomes of each. Then, consider how you might backtrack or look ahead in each path to make global decisions. Based on this analysis, develop a final to do list and complete the first course of action."
Good point, though I will say that I've checked out a lot of library books that have had useful markings people have put in them, though I wouldn't personally mark something that isn't my own property that way.
How Somali workers in the US are fighting Amazon’s surveillance machine
Yes, on (2), this is a major issue on many screens. "The design isn't telling me" is a perfect summation of what visual language is supposed to do.
I have so many stories about Wendy Carlos - one of my college teachers wrote the early moog manuals and was fond of saying “Walter was an asshole, Wendy was the sweetest person I’ve ever met” - someone told me of a time they were synthesizing a trumpet and someone invited Wendy in, who listened for 20 seconds and said the third partial was a few dbs off, sure enough it sounded much more real after adjusting just that - but at the end of the day, something everyone forgets to acknowledge is just how great of a performer she was - switched on Bach wasn’t great because of the patches she used or the mixing or anything technical, she was really an amazing interpreter in the classical sense of Bach, and her works shine for it - pity that she is so regressive when it comes to digital rights, but a reminder that being a genius in one field does not make you a genius in related fields
I suspect how much they care about privacy depends on how the pollster asks the question.
I wouldn't, just because it's so long ago. It's like reading, "the only person who has attempted to build Babbage's Difference Engine is Donald E. Knuth"!
Fun! Wasn't on the other submission, a list of retro Polish games. Maybe it doesn't qualify as retro though.
FBI broke rules in scouring foreign intelligence on Jan. 6 riot, protests
What liberal political bias in what areas? Give me an example prompt?
Mostly because he's a writer.
I recently rewatched this movie as the first time I saw it I couldn't get into it (mainly because of the de-aging I think).

It was the scene at the gas station where Joe Pescis character says to De Niros character something like "what's your name kid?" that made me laugh out loud. De Niro literally looks like a 50 year old.
You can use any engine you want.
That, and also bundling their browser (and hence their search engine) inside lots of popular apps during the late '00s and early '10s.

Remember these prompts? https://www.thewindowsclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/ch...
The Wikipedia Manual of Style is a good guide to cases like this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Gend...

To answer your question, she/her is correct, and a brief note that she went by Walter at the time is sufficient to avoid confusion.
Columbus Project – A fast, API first subdomain discovery service
Nginx uses an event driven model where a single thread might perform work for multiple requests. Often the batching and caching of these requests can boost performance. Apache however assigns each inbound connection its own dedicated thread which makes it slightly more responsive on average. At the end of the day it's going to come down to the priority of scheduling for the threads of the program whether it be one process with 65,535 threads or 65,535 single threaded processes
Certainly, the raw examples can be seen here (for logiqa task) for each optimizer: https://github.com/vaibkumr/prompt-optimizer/tree/master/eva...

Thank you for the advice, making more readable comparisons will be very helpful. We shall do it.
the example given by the parent isn’t even an issue with GPT-3 or 3.5, never mind 4. it’s just a quirk of chatGPT. if you access any of the models via the API, you wouldn’t get this problem at all, because you control the system prompt
Huh, I thought it was Facebook's. The source on Wikipedia has a surprisingly helpful title:

> Meta fights to overturn UK order to sell Giphy
Yeah, oh my god the new Top Gun could have not been more in your face "look how cool and good the American military is facing evil vague but unspecified foreigners." Or how new romance movies are like "wow city life is miserable, soulless you should move out to this idilic countryside." And the ridiculous amount of movies that basically exist to ego stroke middle aged white dudes, like yes I get it you saved America or whatever using the your old man wisdom. Oh, and my favorite "isn't the nuclear family great, so great that you should put up with toxic familial relationships -- they can change just try harder."

At least in the dad movie category they've switched to the hot girl half his age being the protagonist's daughter instead of love interest.
Spending 2% of GDP on something wouldn't cause a recession. It might even be more of a stimulus.
> Personally I like both projects, as I hope I made clear in the OP

<3

You did, but it generally sounded like Kysely doesn't have a bunch of things, when in fact it does.

A more balanced comment would've suggested both projects have X, but I like Y's implementation better.

So I jumped in, to inform and give my 2 cents. :)

> I sense that there's some history and strife here that I'm not clued into as an outsider.

There's none of that really. :)
You strike me as extremely rude. I hope I'm wrong too.
Because homelessness. Because medical bankrupcy and opioid crisis. Caused by THE SAME industry. Nobody's responsible. Because USA is designed by and for small groups of people owning the companies providing for ridiculous money at insane conditions what everywhere else is cheap or free and well regulated.
Dwgd: Docker WireGuard Driver
You wrote the blog post I've been thinking about writing for years. It's clear and simple and to the point. What you describe occurs constantly in every American city.

Thank you.
cat, fopen, fread, fwrite, etc.
I mean, how does a company hire 7 employees based on the funding/money they've raised, and then layoff every single one of those 7 hired employees in a span of about 1 year?
With such planning/decision making, and no business model in place, how do VCs even fund them in the first place?
Indeed they were. I saw the two of them on a speaking tour at UCLA in the late 1990s, before Christopher became obsessed with Islam. They were kind of acting like bad schoolboys, drinking and smoking on stage IIRC. It would not be surprising if they went to Oxford together, of course Hitchens did.
Thank you for your detailed response. It's illuminating. That being said, isn't this mostly speculative? Time after time, we have seen majority of people choose ads over subscription. The only successful digital subscription models have been for streaming (netflix etc), ecommerce (amazon etc); basically things that have never been ads-supported.

I have never seen a service/industry move from ads to subscription. People will watch as many ads as you throw at them to avoid paying.

For example, even though youtube keeps increasing ads to an annoying level, vast majority of public is willing to grovel through that rather than pay for it. What evidence do you have that makes you think that that will change?

Please don't get me wrong. I admire someone creating a new and different search engine but if you keep growing in size, I believe you will face the same pressures that google/bing/etc faced and go the same route they did. "The king is dead, long live the king" scenario.

PS : remember larry and sergey warned about advertising incentives in their research paper as well but once you see the 9-10-11-12 digit figures on a piece of paper, idealistic morality usually goes out the window.

Ofc this is just my "educated guess at best, speculation at worst". I have a lot less information than you in this field.
Upload worked for me, I think in April some time, but my gif never made it into the search, I can only direct link its page. Thought it was some untrusted new account issue
Summarizing is condensing. I think you are thinking of paraphrasing.
I'm guessing a large part of the controversy is related to the fact that reading has many different aspects. Possibly the article is referring to the same kind of reading you're referring to - technical books on various real-world topics.

However, it's much harder to see the value in doing anything like the article is suggesting for literature. Is there really much to gain from writing a summary of Virginia Woolf's To The Lighthouse, or of a book of poetry? Is that even the right way to engage with the material?
It's GPT-3.5 which has this horrible tendency to apologize for everything, up to a point, where it becomes a big annoyance.

GPT-4, on the other hand, no longer seems to have this problem. With GPT-4 I'm getting responses which exceed even what I'd expect from a human.

---

ME: Actually, the editor is telling me that it is an `Option<Arc<Vec ...`, it's just that it seems to be capable to do a `data.iter()` on the returned `Arc`, is this normal?

-

GPT: Yes, that is perfectly normal. When you have a smart pointer such as Arc<T> or Box<T>, you can call methods on T directly. Rust automatically dereferences the smart pointer for you.

In your case, Vec<T> has a method iter() which you can call directly on Arc<Vec<T>>. The Arc is automatically dereferenced, and the iter() method is called on the Vec<T> that it's pointing to.

This feature is called "Deref coercions" in Rust. It's a convenience feature which allows certain types of values to be automatically dereferenced as needed for function calls, method calls, and dot expressions. So even though data is of type Arc<Vec<T>>, you can call Vec<T> methods directly on data.

However, please note that data.iter() gives you an iterator over immutable references, not mutable ones. This is because Arc<T> only allows shared, immutable access to the data it manages. To get a mutable reference to the data, you have to use Arc::make_mut(), as I've explained in previous posts.

-

ME: Interesting. But it's a bit spooky that it does this automatically, because, per-se, an Arc should not contain those methods nor pretend to do.

-

GPT: Yes, the concept of dereferencing in Rust can indeed be a bit spooky at first glance, especially if you're coming from other programming languages. However, it's designed with strict rules that maintain Rust's guarantees of safety and concurrency.

The Deref trait in Rust is what allows such behavior. When a type T implements the Deref trait, it allows an instance of T to be treated like a reference of another type. So in this case, the Arc<T> struct implements the Deref trait, which returns a &T. This is why you're able to call methods of T directly on an Arc<T>.

However, Rust is also careful to not let this cause any safety issues. For instance, even though you can call Vec<T> methods on an Arc<Vec<T>> because of the Deref trait, Rust's borrowing rules still apply. So you can't mutate the Vec<T> through the Arc<T> unless you're the only one holding a reference to it (which is what Arc::make_mut() checks for).

In other words, Rust's Deref coercions can indeed feel a bit magic, but they are designed to work with Rust's other features to maintain safety.

---

The amount and relevance of the extra information provided is astonishing. "This feature is called "Deref coercions" ...", "The Deref trait in Rust is what allows such behavior. ..."
Something I’ve always noticed across the US political landscape: people really don’t like spending money to directly help people (mental health care, institutions, public housing, addiction recovery programs) but are fine with wasting money in weird ways like having this non profit travel the world to learn how to put up a sun shade.

It’s like the thing Americans dislike isn’t spending the money but the idea of helping the wrong sorts of people.

I’m sure that non profit was full of mostly white college graduates. Tossing money their way is fine even if it doesn’t accomplish much or anything. Let the addicts die on the street.
This nuance gets missed in most conversations about reading. I see there are motivations to read a book:

1. For fun
2. For information
3. For understanding

If reading for fun, do what suits you… there’s really no wrong way. Like food, whatever suits your tastes is best.

If reading for information (eg on tactics in some battle or HR practices in some form when you are already broadly acquainted with tactics and HR) then there are tips for extracting essential points that apply to most everyone.

Likewise when reading for understanding (eg having no conception about how war works and trying to grok it).

Some books can be read in each way, other books only in one or two. In any case, making broad claims about “how to read better” without appealing to one of these modes usually sparks disagreement.
If you're looking to archive/download/whatever the images on gfycat.com, you can do the following:

0. This process only works in Chrome(-based) browsers

1. Open each of the following domains:

- gfycat.com

- api.gfycat.com

- weblogin.gfycat.com

- thumbs.gfycat.com

2. You will see a scary HTTPS warning. This is fine.

3. Type "thisisunsafe" into the page (no need to select anything or click and input field). This overrides any and all HTTPS errors that aren't technical issues.

4. After doing this for every domain, the HTTPS errors will be ignored for the rest of the session and the site will work again. If anything is still broken, hit F12 for the dev tools and check the network tab to see what domains failed and maybe try the above again.

Two days of downtime starting on a week day is not a good sign. Back up any images you want to keep!
Looks like 32-bit user mode (but not kernel mode) is not getting removed, so these games should still work.
I see some people are downvoting my comment because it is suggesting an option that uses AI

I'm not biased, i neither like or dislike AI or any other tech.

Perplexity seems to use gpt-3 under the hood but i couldn't care less about that. What i care about is that it allows me to dig into and learn new subjects in a way that was not possible before.

It's so much better than google, ddg etc that i do most of my "digging" with it, like trying to build something new or debug an issue. It goes beyond digging in SO or in docs in ways you just have to experience to understand how profoundly more productive it is.

And I'd love to have more options. Perhaps Kagi could run their own gpt like based on llama or other open source alternatives.

To each their own, if you still want to stick with traditional search, I'm sure those will still be around
Submitter (but not original author of the game) here.

Sadist (and its sequels) was little-heard of among the Polish gamers of the late 90s and early 2000s, but it did manage to amass something of a cult following. IIRC there was a small but vibrant forum in its heyday, and the game's online fanbook (now read-only) has 700+ entries.

The author, Grzegorz 'GAD' Drozd, was a frequent poster to pl.comp.lang.pascal in its heyday. In addition to Sadist, he also produced many other DOS and Windows freeware games, most of them single-handedly. His site (gadz.pl) is well worth checking out.
> I'd like to see an expert's analysis.

Wikipedia seems like a good place to start: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_number
I wish we could customize the assistant to a certain degree. Possibly also save templates for assistants.
Do you have a source on GCC supporting v 0.7.1? That is contrary to what I've read.
is it?

I can tell you for a fact that if I put "don’t use words like please, sorry, apologize, etc. speak plainly" in the gpt-4 (or 3 or 3.5) system prompt, it will not use those words in its completions
Amis wasn't primarily an SF author but "The Janitor on Mars" is a really great SF short of his.
This is a common misconception rife across regular "techie" audiences. Many consumers do understand its privacy implication (+ads) and they consider it as a plausible economical trade-off to freely use the service. Some younger people even see it as utility! (which to be honest I don't fully understand yet) This is why those privacy narrative doesn't resonate well across the majority. If you want to promote a specific agenda, you first gotta understand the target audience rather than the topic.
In some sense U.S. regulation is the best in the world in that we’ve led on many health and safety issues such as suppressing tobacco smoking, nutritional labeling, airbags in cars, airplanes, etc.
I now find myself googling for other peoples notes on a book if I want to extract more. I read through those notes and rewrite with a pen in a journal and start to pull apart the dense notes further and connect to my own experience and life
Not all IMHO. I think the next step is layering human choice in weights on yop of the already established models.
Sam Altman has played 4d chess with the “intellectual
internet”. It is sad but beautiful to watch, I’d have trouble believing it wasn’t intentional…

Watching the bros virtue signal and actually spend their own money to prove all the plebs and dummies who use the free option wrong is priceless to watch…
I live in an apartment with neighbors who are subsidized, there’s a psychiatric hospital in every major city, and all night movie theaters would exist if there was a market for them. If you think there’s a market and money to be made - start your own
One thing that occurs to me is that we often fail to believe that people 3000 years ago were just as smart as we are, blinded both by our knowledge of them and our certainty of their limited knowledge. Limited knowledge does not mean that one is not innately smart though, and unable to figure some stuff out...
We used to have vagrancy laws too, and jailed hobos for being a nuisance.
Ask HN: How do you track your job applications?
I recently started looking for a new job and made a simple spreadsheet to myself to keep track of my applications. However, It quickly grew in size and it became tedious to navigate.
I wonder if there are good solutions out there.

What tools do you use to track your job applications?
As the country gets more heterogeneous, people will want less to help others, as they know they won't be helping their own.
Defiance and Deplorable Decisions: Russia Placing ICC Prosecutor on Wanted List
An exploit can reveal your KeePass master password in plaintext