skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nothing like generative AI has ever happened. This is new, which is part of why it’s so exciting.

No I don’t think these things are going to become sentient (in their present form at least) but no technology has ever been able to do what these models do.
RNNs have a theoretically infinite context size, but in practice it’s limited by vanishing gradients due to too much recursion. That’s why the recursive units are usually LSTMs or GRUs that have explicit functionality to cut off the recursion, using a learnable threshold that’s a function of both the current and recursive inputs.

In your example, x[n-1] = f(x[n-2], x[n-1]). So really, your expression should be

RNN: x[n] = f( … f( f( f( f(k0, x[0]), x[1]), x[2]), x[3]), …, x[n-1])

where k0 is a learnable parameter.
Software engineering is old hat now.
This logic doesn't work because in many cases the spying is on things like communications. And you can't tell whose communications they are until after you've spied on them. Bytes don't have little US flag stickers on them.

EU human rights law doesn't make this distinction between citizen and non-citizen.
Jeez reading over some of the other literature I could find looks like they can issue “batch jobs” to run many queries without having to do them manually/wait. Makes me think performance isn’t that quick and that there is an ungodly amount of data they are querying.
Wasn't there news recently about Safari overtaking edge as the second most popular browser?

If so, we should probably be developing for it too. Not just the top 1. Yes, there's a gap between 1 and 2, but you can't just discount it when building an app.
why just 2-3 years, let's evaluate decades, obviously COVID skewed the past 2-3 years

as well, you should be working with inflation adjusted dollars already to make your point
I should have said "people and organizations" because that's what I meant.

The mechanism with organizations works like you said yes. They'll just develop processes to work around the bugs until it becomes completely impossible.
I still find Atkinson dithering the prettiest.
Here's an old Python2 implementation: https://gist.github.com/radupotop/ea41c108de0cb987eacff6dae2...
Sifting flour is absolutely essential if you’re adding it to a liquid. Sometimes you can get away without sifting if you mix a few dry ingredients first then add liquid on top. If you get it wrong, the flour clumps up tiny grains and never separates. You can end up with really grainy cheese cake
Could Argentina be the next Latin American country to dollarize its economy?
> the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Not actual law or legally binding.
Yes, it (often) is, and the set of "creative" occupations given are also (often) highly analytical activities. I don't think this is surprising to the programmers, at least -- "being able to create something from nothing" is often mentioned as a motivating factor for why programmers enjoy programming.

The article refers to code as the (creative) output of the programmer, but that doesn't seem right to me.
A picture you painted is not the same as the tautness of the canvas you painted it on. Sure, the canvas is important/critical, but it's not the work.
(the code isn't the thing the programmer is creating, even though it is literally the thing they are creating)

Unfortunately, the article doesn't really talk about "how to treat people who write code well" much at all, let alone with reference to the creativity of programm{ers,ing}. Most of the suggested accommodations are mentioned frequently elsewhere, and make just as much sense without mentioning creativity.
The exception is "Understand & manage the emotional impact of creation" which has a real point buried in it somewhere, but is just a short paragraph that mentions the "ikea effect" (SEO?) before making the bold claim that "All code typically has a short lifespan of a few years at most." which seems to suggest that the programmers are actually over-invested. Perhaps the programmers should set their expectations more appropriately and then be paid less.

Also, please don't tell my manager that I may have an emotional attachment to a particular line of code. I don't need that.
Addressing Media Capture
Yeah but if you're a newbie you're not really seeing the whole thing. That's the problem in my opinion. You're told to stir until golden brown, wait till the jiggle is just right, etc. You edit out the boring bits because that's common TV etiquette but then it doesn't become a cooking video anymore, it's just entertainment. That's the fundamental divergence of cooking content: instructional cooking or cooking as entertainment. One tries to mask itself as the other, because the other is boring. You end up with this weird edutainment content that's barely instructional and ripe with inaccuracies, hence recipes that take three times as long in reality to prepare.

I wager that most people hardly ever try the recipes they see, and of those that do, most suck at cooking. The point at which you start fast forwarding through stuff is the point in which you don't need cooking videos anymore and can just work off a written recipe. People want entertainment, and cooking is one of those easily monetized. non-politicized things on youtube that's just ripe to turn your brain off and follow along.
One of the more unique design complexities of the Concorde was the need to swing the nose out of the way for take off and (more so) landing, specifically so that the pilots could see wtf they were doing. That's why its nose looks like it does. It absolutely did not look "normal" at the time.
Yes, they sold slightly improved versions in very low volumes (~ 100 LM-2 were sold by Symbolics, see above), until they had a machine that was a bit more designed to be a commercial product - machines which were still very fragile -> the Symbolics 3600 and the LMI LAMBDA.
This might be interesting for you

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CVe8-eKSK8
You should probably try out some other religion, because Buddhism isn't working out for you
I was talking about American strategy. Russia was and is a largely-neutralized regional great power, no longer any real threat to Western hegemonic power. China is a different matter.

China manufactures more than America, EU and Japan combined, and (IIRC) produces more STEM graduates than all of them too. Add Russia's resources on top, and even with the major demographic problems China faces, America has a challenger on its hands that's much bigger than the Soviet Union could ever aspire to be.

Strongly shoving Russia into China's orbit was just plain stupid. It looks like they were gambling on regime change; a bad gamble if ever I saw one.

Edit: all of this is ignoring India too. At some point India will catch up, and then the collective West potentially could end up third.
I ran into this issue when making french onion soup for the first time. I was so mad. The recipe said something like 45 minutes to cook the onions down. No. It took over 2 hours. Was it delicious at the end? Definitely. But I'd have started earlier and had it with the rest of my meal.
I thought this seemed familiar, and generated a decent amount of discussion last time, too.
We’ve already reversed population growth everywhere except Africa and they’ll only be a decade or two behind. We need to stabilize it if we’re going to avoid population and then civilization collapse. Civilizational collapse is bad for the environment btw since it will mean a return to burning coal and wood and the removal of all environmental regulations on pollution and exploitation.
Can't you disprove string theory by disproving quantum physics?
> no administration can function effectively without this "deep state"

Why? I mean we need "dark budgets" to some extend (spy agencies, military). But do we need a "deep state", meaning: big biz and govt make the decisions behind closed doors and then merely project an image of democracy/voting/transparency?

Where was the public support for Iraq/Afghanistan/Unkrain and soon Taiwan? The deep state need no public support, they just need a "positive impact on the bottom line" (profit) of their "partners". Disgusting.
That sort of thing takes more than one generation
Pins: Permanent Nix Binary Storage
I'm not requesting you do anything, I'm not even a customer (as far as I know), I'm saying what I would do in your position if I was aiming to support an audio product on Linux. I explained why I would choose Fedora. It's your business, you run it as you see fit.

I can't help but feel that maybe you read too much into what you get sent.

I would pick one "known good config" (your distro of choice), present it as what it gets tested on prior to release, and for anything else, you're on your own, that's part-and-parcel to being a Linux user. It assumes some kind of ability to troubleshoot and solve your own problems. It isn't for everybody, just like a Mac or Windows isn't for everybody.

Officially, DaVinci Resolve has CentOS as the only supported config, but it runs on other Linux distros just fine. Doesn't seem to hurt its popularity on Linux.

If you go back a couple decades, there was even developer-recommended hardware for specific DAWs. People will use whatever gets the job done, your product or not, Linux or not.
Go back. Search for "yellow journalism".
Video editing? Shhhh! Don't give away all the secrets.. I'm waiting for their geology channel.
Yes, incompetent, and not due to as of yet unknown payoffs to key officials. With that much money at stake, in a far less transparent world than we live in today, briefcases full of cash worked a lot better. How would you even deposit that today without some sort of money laundering scheme?
I often wondered why people got paid to flip signs for stores/tax services. Turns out it’s way more eyeball catching because of the way we evolved. Can’t this be something similar?
There was a long period where they were quarantined and the modding quality fell through the floor before they were finally banned.
This should be a capital crime.
Plus when Bush took over, looks like he had the DOJ drop the case. At least under Clinton they were trying, though incompetently as you said.
> stealing associations to bring error messages/dodge the invocation of the competitor software

So... just like what they're doing with browsers these days then
It sends our request over a lot of proxies so your scraper does not get rate limited or blocked by ip address.
Michel de Montaigne
Heh, I find self checkout more efficient. I use multiple bags when bagging and pre-sort items based on where they go in my kitchen. Plus most baggers are terrible at bagging and just resort to a massive number of bags which kinda ignores the purpose of the bags.
Principia was proven right at every turn, and explained all of the observed mechanics experiments, all the way up until Maxwell's equations were formalized and their effects tested out, some 200 years after it was published. It's also important the theories it replaced were massively more complex.

Maxwell's equations were first formulated in 1865, the "patch" to Newton's theories was formulated soon after (the luminiferous aether), the Michelson-Morley experiment proving the patch did not work was run in 1887, and the theory of special relativity was proposed in 1905 - so it took about 20 years at most between Newtonian mechanics being conclusively proven to contradict experiments and a new theory becoming proeminent. And special relativity was quickly replaced with general relativity (just 10 years later), because, despite its success, its limitations were immediately apparent.
Keep users motivated, engage and active with our Vision AI for Fitness
Excited to share the release of Version 1 of our SDK for Health and Fitness apps to add pose detection to their apps quickly and with powerful benefits for their users.

With QuickPose.ai your users will be:
- Motivated to complete their exercise with our counters and measurements.
- Engaged to get in the right position as they are guided like a real coach would do.
- Inspired to get moving again, the AR & AI helps keep users on track and monitor their progress to their goals.

You can try our Sample App that is available in the GitHub Repo.
Sorry, you bought Microsoft lies hook, line, and sinker. No shame! Everybody did. That's why DR-Dos isn't with us any more.

What they said it's entirely plausible is the problem, and that's why people bought it. Even if it was true, it's on Microsoft for doing that, not DR-Dos for being incompatible. It's like how you needed to be using IE6 to browse the web, or using Microsoft Word from Microsoft Office to edit your documents.

What's really sad is how much things have shifted against Microsoft. Now it's Apple's turn on top, and people are buying that same line just as naively. iMessage this and iCloud that.
> It is precisely this violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Pretty much all countries distinguish citizens from non-citizens. This isn't an American thing. And you're committing a category error, namely that rights Americans have aren't a superset of any internationally agreed rights. They are.
I doubt the objections are about scraping per se, but about unethical scraping where no consideration is given to etiquette.

"proxy rotation" in the first line does not bode well for ethics.
Instead of negotiation and mutually beneficial arrangements what you get are threats, sanctions and slander. It’s not unheard of the eu meddling in the internal affairs of sovereign member states, not only east but south and in some cases north west european. It is usually those yielding disproportionate power that impose their will on the rest. Sometimes with deadly geopolitical consequences.
Ahh yes, the guy who worked at LinkedIn, I presume?
But... do you play it all using downstrokes?
Aren't Vortex AI Workbooks on Google Cloud exactly the tool to solve this?
"Okay, let's work out one more row."
Here is a summary of the key points in the PDF:

Large language models are increasingly being used for general problem solving, but they are still limited by their token-level, left-to-right generation process.

The authors propose a new Tree of Thoughts (ToT) framework to address this. ToT frames problem solving as search through a tree of "thoughts", where each thought is an intermediate step towards the solution.

This allows the language model to:

- Generate and explore multiple potential thoughts at each step

- Evaluate the progress of different thoughts using self-evaluation prompts

- Perform lookahead and backtracking to make global decisions

The authors propose 3 tasks to test ToT: Game of 24, Creative Writing and Crosswords.

ToT significantly outperforms standard input-output and chain-of-thought prompting baselines on all 3 tasks. This shows the benefits of ToT's ability to explore, evaluate and search through different reasoning paths.

The key benefits of ToT are:

- Generality: It generalizes existing prompting methods

- Modularity: The components can be varied independently

- Adaptability: It can accommodate different problem properties and resource constraints

- Convenience: It only requires a pre-trained language model

The ToT framework shows how deliberate search through a tree of "thoughts" can help large language models solve problems that require planning and search, beyond their standard left-to-right generation process.

Code to be (isn't yet) released at: https://github.com/ysymyth/tree-of-thought-llm

// via: https://kagi.com/summarizer/index.html?url=https%3A%2F%2Farx...
The vote system became a lot more useless the day they removed the upvote/downvote counter.
What’s the porn industry going to turn into when all of the current material can be AI generated?

It’s all bad. This is one of the few areas that I support an all out ban
are you the same person as above? why do you keep making new users?.

> The situation was exactly the same before 2014:

> https://www.businessinsider.com/wikileaks-russia-cable-2014-...

> Moreover, U.S. efforts to sabotage EU-Russia trades go back to the Soviet times.

There as zero talk of Ukraine being in NATO in serious manner before Russia invaded, if Ukraine manages to get into NATO, Russia would have caused it.
Ok so if they don’t try their own recipes, then how did they make the pictures that accompany the recipes?
He doesn't waste time mincing onions, at most he'll showcase how to do one with proper technique. He has entire videos dedicated on how to chop vegetables and prepare meat. His videos take a long time because he doesn't bullshit the cooking process. You watch him stir until he's at the right consistency to add other ingredients, you watch him go through the entire process for literal 30 minute meals because that's what he promises you. If you have your ingredients ready, this will take 30 minutes. And 30 minutes is what you get.
yup somekind dating sim + gpt4 + micropayments will be huge kinda evil but huge.
I think most passing readers would assess the likelihood relative to Mearsheimer not in your favour.
Someone, please, do it
No, "gaslighting" is a term for specifically making somebody doubt their own sanity by sabotaging their perception of their own actions.

It's not simply lying or creating fear, it's something a lot more insidious, and I don't think it can be really done on a non-specific target.

Eg, an example would be intentionally hiding somebody's keys to convince them they can't keep track of anything, or scheduling an appointment the person is supposed to go to, never telling them about it, then arguing they were told several times, they're just dumb and forgot.
> You really don’t see the added complexity of this and how this makes a worse user experience?

Bluntly said: IDGAF, and neither should you. Who cares if it's harder for facebook/meta to program? Must we waive our rights because of incompetent or cheap engineering?
>Many people could reason about the book in its entirety

That’s analogous to having War and Peace in the training set. When actually reading War and Peace, nobody‘s working memory includes a precise recall of everything they’ve read thus far, which is more analogous to an LLM’s context size.
Or if they simply prefer to explore, to learn new things, or to fail or succeed on their own, and to enjoy the potential profit of those actions.
ABAC on SpiceDB: Enabling Netflix’s Complex Identity Types
If it’s a fairly common dish, stock photos.
Agree with you on that. I've heard on a podcast (Make Me Smart, maybe) that the HBO brand did not appeal to women, which is what led them to this decision.

I'm just glad they didn't add a + sign onto it like everyone else.
I think my ideal setup is still the Push 2. You’ve got your mouse and keyboard for more tedious workflows and VST usage, and then the Push as an expressive platform to jam with and explore ideas on. Best of both worlds.

It seems like the Push standalone was designed for performers in mind? Would be pretty sweet to not have to bring a laptop up on stage with you, I’d imagine, especially if your setup is modular and otherwise DAW-less.
Well the video talks about this very article!
it also depends on the cut and what you cook too. If you only stir-fry chickens that has been diced small with high heat, (I think?) you can achieve it 3-4 minutes, however that requires extreme precision and I think also require good utensils with precise heating. Cooking it longer, ex 7-8 minutes with lower heat usually bring better result and far easier.

Deep-fry or boiling? I'm unsure. Steaming one? Surely you can't
> As for Russia viewing China with suspicion... that's true of the West too, and yet it has been piping gas and oil to Germany since the 1960s.

The point wasn’t that Russia doesn’t engage with other countries, it’s that Russia won’t engage too closely with China so there isn’t as much for American strategists to worry about there. Not to mention China is economically dependent on the U.S., EU, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and other western-aligned nations. Vacationing in Nice is way more fun than vacationing in Siberia. The Russian economy is an afterthought and that was before sanctions.

> This is all true, and yet ignores the price of production and transportation. Once the various Power Of Siberia pipelines are all complete, China may be getting gas cheaper than any price Europe can get.

Sure… but there’s a few things here:

1) alternative energy sources become more and more economically viable so they get built in Europe - oil/nat gas producers don’t want too much of this happening if they can avoid it

2) the market is global, so increase in purchases from Russia means decreases in purchases from other countries - if your demand is 100 barrels and you buy 50 from Saudi Arabia and 50 from Russia and then you buy 60 from Russia instead and buy 40 from Saudi Arabia the excess supply of 10 barrels has to get sold somewhere, and potentially at a lower price (remember when the spot price of oil went negative? [1])

3) OPEC (at least pre-war) has some “say” in setting the global price for oil

4) there are different types of oil for different uses so a new pipeline is just one piece of the supply puzzle

[1] https://www.marketwatch.com/story/oil-prices-went-negative-a...
For the economic, and sometimes military, benifits that come with that cooperation
I'm guessing that "about the same" will be hard to measure, and that at some point, thermodynamics will dictate the maximum performance per power output (assuming fixed transistor architecture).
IIRC the ruling was under Clinton, but the 'punishment' under Bush was that Microsoft gave free copies of Windows to schools (which were a Apple bastion at the time).
This is very bad.

“her” is not a particularly uplifting movie.
Its like the bendy bananas or turkey certain to be joining the EU next week (5 years ago) all over again
Nintendo sued for “immoral” Mario Kart lootboxes
I'm one of the maintainers of Faker, so hopefully I can help remedy any situation we inadvertently created.

https://fakerjs.dev/api/helpers.html#arrayelement

I believe is what you're looking for. The issue, as I recall, is that all of Faker is random, so what does it mean to have a `random` module namespace. We moved it out of a hope for improved clarity.
>Car companies (perhaps rightly) assumed that the best way to sell America’s truck-loving population on plug-in power is to electrify a bunch of pickups.

This smacks of revisionist history. American car companies mostly stopped selling cars when the EPA made emissions restrictions for cars and not for trucks (auto lobbyists helped). They based the regulation on something the auto industry gets to define for itself.

Since then, vehicles have been getting bigger. Lots of Americans aren't happy about it.

Many still buy these because there's an arms race for road visibility. You need a giant vehicle to see around the giant vehicles.

Others buy the popular thing because of deals and the increased possibility of getting parts to fix it in several years. It's harder to get parts for a vehicle that was only sold for two years twenty years ago.

US customers have been buying large vehicles, but that doesn't mean the customers have been the ones driving the trend.