skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> At least cp can figure out the block size itself.

Why does it matter? Use `bs=$((4 * 1024 * 1024))`. It'll work perfectly for any imaginable block size.

My issue with dd is that it's possible to write corrupted data with some weird flags which I did once. Something with conv=sync I believe which does unexpected things. But if you're not trying to be too smart, dd works fine.
What are the differences between the HLS and SLD contracts?
>Economically, that's absurd.

Only if you're very greedy. The truth is just the opposite, it's not absurd at all to pay well.

Lets imagine a hypothetical economy where there is only one company. "Pool party supplies". That is they sell things like beach balls and pool floats. So in your economic system it would make sense for the company to get rid of many employees as possible, and have the ones remain work 16 hours a day...

...and then they go out of business???...

People that are working 16 hours a day don't go to pool parties. The small economic upper class doesn't buy enough pool party supplies to justify the companies existence. The unemployed don't buy party supplies. Economic profit maximization lead to less profit in this case!

In this derived scenario having more employees that earn well and have plenty of time off leads to more pool party supply sales.
What do you mean by “actually worked”?
If you boot OpenBSD thousands of times per day it adds up. I can imagine this being the case for people running big server farms or doing virtualization stuff.
Yes and "AI" isn't much different.
If something affects so many basic functions of the body, the side effects must be intense as well
> I've never encountered another person with this same eye disorder... It can be a real nuisance in certain cases. Nice to see this specifically addressed :)

I had this as a child, meant that it wasn't clear I had vision issues for a bit. I could see things clearly.

While my far-sighted became near-sighted eventually, it remains a dominant eye for me.
main point of running unixy stuff is exactly that i can mold my solution to specific problem EASILY. thats why it is so common in embedded market ( routers, kiosks,drones, car infotainment, TV... )
>It does get you 11 carrier fleet strike groups, and 5,500 nuclear weapons, though.

The majority of government spending is on social services. Defense is usually under 20% of the budget.

These are 2022 numbers, so a bit out of whack from Covid-19, but they get the point across. https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/feder...

The problem in the U.S. is inefficiency. The U.S. spends more public money per capita on healthcare than most of its peers. Simply nationalizing the healthcare system would quite possibly lead to lower taxes, and would certainly lead to much lower healthcare spending. We know how to make a system that provides for everyone and we know it will save us money, but we can't do it because that would be SOCIALIST!!!

There's no need to slash the defense budget to make the U.S. government function better. All we need to do is jettison the ideologues deliberately sabotaging good government at every turn.

(I do support slashing defense budgets, but that has nothing to do with saving money. I'd support lighting the money on fire rather than spending it on "national security".)
A lot of clinics are administering the generic form and it is still very expensive.
Auto Scaling Azure Cosmos DB for PostgreSQL with Citus, Grafana, & Azure Funcs
Debian releases generally have a 5 year support cycle, at least the last several have, which is the same as Ununtu LTS. It also seems pretty standard for most distros now.

EDIT: I forgot that Freexian also provides a few more years, but I've never used that. I find that I need to upgrade more frequently to keep up with increasing security requirements anyway.
Good on you for making this clear
You don't see how, say, someone who wants to teach a class and collect tuition might not want to put all their content on YouTube and get a pittance?

And now replace teaching with pretty much any other content. A musician giving a concert, TED talks, etc.
Clojure only uses earmuffs for dynamic vars
Another dimension is whether the (what is the correct noun here?) is a TTY or not. Arguably a progress display, especially one that deletes itself afterward, is a useful default when it's a TTY, but obviously it makes scripting annoying if you have to constantly add -q or -s (looking at you, CURL) to every command to shut it up.
It depends on your workflow doesn't it?

If you're just re-building on the command line every time you make a change, and your build takes 30 seconds, then yeah you wait.

If you're working in an IDE, running your project out of the IDE, then you might have more options. For example, in IntelliJ IDEA, you can often reload changed classes and hot update the running program.
The two responses to your comment missed your sarcasm, so perhaps some of the onus is on you as well.
Gypsy housing used to be the mecca for this kind of activity. They changed the name (reasonably so!) to Ghostlight Housing, but it looks like it was suspended by an admin in 2022.

If you generally search the web for "NYC housing facebook groups", those keywords will lead you to the right groups. Note you'll probably have an easier time searching for these groups with Google than with FB. And don't be intimidated by private groups, the barriers to entry are really low.

There are niche groups for artists, craftspeople, etc. if that appeals you – just add appropriate keywords!
Have your accountant send them a letter, and then if that doesn't work, pay a lawyer to send them a letter.
That's actually something I've been saying for quite awhile when people bring up microbenchmarks complaining about how a language like Haskell is slow.

Like, yes, no question, if you try and implement a tightloop in Haskell vs C, C is going to come out a lot faster.

However, no one writes Haskell like that! People rely pretty heavily on standard libraries (or even third party libraries), and on the optimizations afforded to them by the "rich" language of Haskell.

C might be capable of being faster, but that doesn't imply that a C program will inherently be faster than a similar Haskell program, especially if the programs are relatively large.
Have you started here? https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=anatomy+ergonomics
A great quote, but not applicable. The problem with LLMs is that they are non-deterministic, and you can ask the exact correct question and get the wrong answer.
Also relevant and stated publicly by John, Blue Origin expects to cover more than 50% of the total cost.

To put this into perspective the DoD will happily invest north of $1 Trillion for a single fighter pilot development program (F-35) and I doubt Lockheed is willing to front any of that...
The tablet capabilities are 5 years behind and twice the price, but they do get better every year. The main problem is that they use the world's worst app store.

Most apps aren't able to use storage, but those of us on the outside can create logins and change some account settings. iHeartRadio and PlutoTV are probably the best ones prisoners get access to; can't get save things locally but the websites will remember activity.
I posted a similar thought on a thread a while back (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35163715) that, though cynical, still feels like it has a ring of truth. Interested in others’ take on this:

It's possible that people looking back will consider that the mistake was putting all the content online. Perhaps even upstream of that: the first mistake was digitizing things. The music industry certainly didn't realize when they adopted CDs that they were starting down the path to self destruction... the newspaper industry likewise didn't notice how profound taking their newsprint product and packaging it as HTML would be...

And now we're unleashing ML training on all that digital, online data. Which industries will discover that this is the thing that means putting your data online, digitally, was a mistake? Certainly artists are feeling it now... maybe programmers, too, a little.
So how do you put the genie back in the bottle? Live performances, with recording devices banned? Distribute written material only on physically printed media - but how to prevent scanning? Or just escalate the DRM war - material is available online, but only through proprietary apps on locked down platforms?
Or is this going to take regulation - new laws to protect copyrights in the face of ML training?

It wasn't always the case, that you could assume that if some information exists, it should show up in a single search. That's an expectation we invented only about 25 years ago. It's possible that the result of all this is that we figure out that we can't actually sustain the free sharing of information that makes that possible.

The problem is, to borrow a phrase: information wants to be free...
So I finally got some responses from support.

They told me they logged everyone out, yet the existing session I had continued to work.

I changed the password, AGAIN at their request, and now my account has been suspended.

Seriously pissed off right now with crypto-bros.
Massive text: "People taking Mounjaro lost up to 25 LBS"

Small text underneath: "Mounjaro is not a weight loss drug."

Man, the US pharma industry/marketing is so weird.

https://www.mounjaro.com/#:~:text=mounjaro%20is%20not%20a%20....
Thank you for posting this. I've started out some MVPs using vector DBs (testing pinecone and supabase with pgvector) and finding a lot of things that are not obvious to me.
Would this “tattooed redneck” that we shouldn’t call a “white supremacist” be the same person with a literal nazi swastika and SS runes tattoos, and a “RWDS” (Right Wing Death Squad) patch?

Jesus man. What more would it take to call him a neo-nazi white supremacist? A notarized letter found on his body, that was penned in his own hand?

And who the said he was mentally ill? We’ve had way too many shooters — including far right terrorists — that were not mentally ill committing mass murder.
It would be irrelevant if they proved collusion since collusion is not a crime.

But yes, they failed to show that YouTube/Twitter "aided and abetted and conspired with ISIS".
You lack the imagination to come up with a use for some improvement off the cuff, that doesn't mean everyone else (some of whom are more motivated) does as well.

Why do we even need to waste any consciousness-seconds on watching electric circuits initialize? Computers should just start working
Should be an age tax as well. If you own a lot of property you should be taxed to hell.
The solution to that was a $10 per month subscription via Netflix and clips for free on YouTube. Meanwhile Ozempic is around $1,000 for a month's supply. That is a margin on par with illegal hard drugs, which already have a smuggling supply chain from China to North America (eg. Fentanyl and variants).
ChatGPT plugins Account Takeover via Prompt injection
As someone who publicly publishes all their ideas everyday in an ideas journal and releases the code of all their side projects on GitHub.

I stand on the shoulders of giants: the people who learned to harvest wheat grain and learnt to mix it with water and heat it into bread.

I don't want to keep my ideas secret if there is a very real chance my ideas can beneficially influence the world, educate or improve people's thinking to make it a superior place.

Like the idea of washing hands to prevent disease or the study of calculus, if someone shares their thoughts, society can get better.

Here's an idea to solve the problem with my attitude - the problem of attribution: "cause coin". What if we could assign numbers or virtually credit causes for our decision making? Wouldn't this provide a paper trail of causality for what happened and why it happened, from people's perspectives at the point of action. Why did you buy this product over this product? (Edit: There's a usecase for blockchain.)

Who needs to do data science with theories when you have direct self reported causality information. Isn't that pseudohonest causality information more useful than unfalsifiable theoretical theories about data?

In the academic realm, we care a lot about attribution but large language models obfuscate causality and attribution.

If someone took my code or idea and built a billion dollar company over it and I didn't receive anything, except for the knowledge that I caused that to happen. Some people would hate that scenario.

Here's another idea: lifestyle subscriptions, you pay your entire salary for a packaged life that includes credits to restaurants, groceries, job, career, transport, products, subscriptions, holidays, savings, investments, hobbies, education. You would need an extremely good planning and lots of business relationships and automation but you could make life really easy for people. Subscribe to a coffee everyday.
Literally the point of the CDA was to avoid that dichotomy, because that was more or less what the law was before that and Congress wanted websites to remove pornography etc., which they wouldn't be willing to do if it came with liability for hosting anything they didn't remove.
For my particular case it's about something similar in purpose to sandboxing, but with providing the compartment (ie a process subtree) with an alternative kernel to talk to, to minimise the attack surface between that container and the host kernel.
I can't provide you with the scientific basic for correct elbow angles and back erectitude, but I will echo the GP's meta-suggestion of 'variety'. I've heard you're supposed to change position every 20 minutes, and stay no more than 2 hours in any position. Walk around, swing your arms. This is the first-order bit. Most other techniques and tools seem to be band-aids to help you tolerate longer stretches of time in a single position. Which, do what you gotta do. But changing it up is the most important thing.
It works for me (again) but I remember that server domain from my old Versio shared hosting account.

They used to be the typical "dirt cheap, low spec, PHP 5.4" hoster of choice for students and people looking to save a buck, but they've since raised their prices significantly (and I don't think they've raised their quality of service much).

Would not recommend. I wouldn't recommend shared hosting in the first place, but if you do, it's worth looking around for better hosts. There's a good chance you'll be better off with Github pages for hosting websites that you expect any visitors to see.
Are you implying that the US does not subsidize its existence by taking wealth from outside countries? That it does not project it's behavior and morality on others?

It had to be on HN for me to read bullshit this absurd.

The nerve on these people.
So wouldn't this fall under the category of "booting the kernel too much"? Why not find a way to keep already-booted kernels laying around and recycle them, rather than rebooting them afresh on every request? This pattern has already played out in other situations and been solved this way, such as with object pools or thread pools.
The IRS won't care (much) but Amazon may have reported things to them, you can get copies of that from the IRS.

You may be able to work it backwards from the bank statements, and make some assumptions.

Document everything, if you get audited (unlikely) they'll understand, as long as you aren't trying to pull a fast one.
You're making some mistakes here...

I don't have a human tutor available and to get one would represent a significant cost for me.

Slightly wrong and available is worth far more than always right and unavailable, especially at the early starting point where you're unsure of how much you want to invest into an endeavor.
I usually like to get to know someone better before we start talking about my onus.
For Many College Grads, the Job Market Isn't Living Up to Their Dreams
The majority of the work on Proton is actually being doing by Codeweavers. IIRC they even control the main github repo
The collapse of New Left politics & the ardent vociferous anti-person/anti-societal rightwingism that has ground effective governance to a halt.

The adversary of humanity grows - ever increasing rent, worsening health care, ever rising corporate profits - and there's no functional bodies left to represent & govern the systems of the world. Jamming up the governments was too easy. Few governments have real power to try anything. Adversarial legalism and adversarial governmentalism insure broad non-response to all situations.
> influence those who create for its own sake

Of course it influences those who create for its own sake. "Creators" are people who need money on a fundamental level, to pay for food, shelter, etc. If you make it impossible for them to earn a living from being creative, you're limiting such creativity to those who are otherwise independently wealthy. In other words, you're making it harder for the less-well-off to actually be creative.
Ehhh I dunno if it's really that nuanced. Companies that are unprofitable, but who sell goods/services above direct costs, are relatively (though of course never totally) safe from the accusation of dumping.

i.e., if you sell a widget for more than it costs to manufacture, but unprofitable after you account for indirect costs like R&D and other corporate costs, it may or may not be dumping.

The VC-backed companies like Uber weren't doing this. They were unprofitable even under the standard of price > direct cost. That's pretty cut and dry dumping.

"Scale until you become profitable" in the traditional (and IMO defensible and sound business) sense is about scaling until your margins cover your fixed and indirect costs like R&D (see: Google, Facebook), but that's not the Uber model.
By this logic we should all get to work in open green spaces, because the tree surgeons do?
> To do C++ right, you'd need to do "marriage of OOP and low level programming" right,

not really, C++ is a multiparadigm language, so is Rust
Yes and no.

Everybody to some degree needs open models based on public data. That's because part of the power of these models is that there needs to be a general-purpose foundation that the LLMs can be fine tuned on for specific purposes. We teach children a variety of subjects because, if you train a child to do nothing except weld for 12 years, you might get an adult who can competently perform very specific welds but is otherwise a bumbling illiterate idiot who can't take custom instructions or do basic arithmetic when just holding a torch isn't enough. You might be able to train an LLM from scratch on a very specific corpus, but LLMs only really become useful when they have an amount of general purpose knowledge.

Plus there's the problem that training an LLM from scratch takes a ton of time.

But the siloing of specific knowledge can make a lot of sense. Specialist LLMs may be closed or semi-closed but still be based on a foundation of open data.
I think it's the opposite. There are of course companies that are being more conservative than others. And there are companies that are going to be more successful than others using this stuff. Because those companies may end up with an edge over those other companies. It's that simple. You can hope for courts to put a stop to that but you'd be a fool to expect them to lift a finger any time soon. And can you afford them taking a different decision?

Probably Apple is right in not being overly worried about losing an edge here short term. But that would be because they are quite comfortably leading way ahead of the pack. They can adjust as needed and cost is not a factor when you ship products with such fat margins as they do. In other words, they can afford to be conservative here and see how things play out and adjust later. A few thousand people in their team being inconvenienced by having to do things manually without AI assistance doesn't really add up to a whole lot of cost for them.

That's not true for a lot of companies. Other companies might have to make different choices in order to stay relevant. In the end it's a choice between artificial intelligence or self-imposed stupidity. Not making proper use of resources available as a company can be a fatal mistake. And things like chat gpt are here right now and usable for anyone who cares to use it. And with some clear added value.

As for the legalities. I wouldn't get my hopes up for judges to apply interpretations of copyright law that are inconsistent with the past ones. Copyright is not going anywhere. And forget about politicians adding much to the law that is going to matter any time soon.

It boils down to concepts like fair use, people actually starting court cases, etc. Lots of people talking about that but not a lot with the deep pockets to follow that through. Not a lot of coherent lobby activity on this front to make politicians move. Lots of companies with deep pockets and a vested interest in this stuff and a lot of lobbying power to ensure the gravy train doesn't grind to a halt.

Apple will eventually integrate AI into their business. It might not be the MS/OpenAI flavour. Or the Google one. Why would they want to depend on that? It's going to be a business decision for them.
Similar story for me. I used Debian for servers for many years, then a few years ago I thought, "well I like Ubuntu's LTS support timespans and release cadence, I think I'll start using that for new server deployments." Then snap happened, now I'm back to Debian. Typing "apt-get install" and ending up with a snap is a really jarring experience.
Exactly, and if we (well you, I'm British) do get them on the moon with the intention of a permanent base, you absolutely want two landing options. If one is found to have a fatal flaw and people are stuck, you need an alternative.

On top of that, this is about promoting investment into infrastructure and vehicles that may one day take us to Mars, you can't just encourage one company to develop that. There needs to be a whole ecosystem of competing companies, we don't want a SpaceX monopoly.
> Public funding of space flight led to mediocre results

Is this bait? Public funding of space flight lead to spaceflight and landing on the moon.
Don’t worry, we just had to go to the comments to find this info.
I wonder what the relative scale of that wealth transfer is compared to the transfer of wealth involved with leveraging the motor vehicle equity of drivers into profits for wealthy investors.

Edit: per reply, “income” would be a better word
Are you asking about sales tax, income tax, or something else? U.S. or which country? Are there any bank records, shipping records, tax deposits, you can use to re-construct some or all of the needed data? (You need to figure out exactly which data you need).
what's available by search engine query is everything that was thought of until now. there's always something new and different...
> Both Europe and the USA benefit

Then why should Europeans be "grateful"?

> So some understanding was built that nobody who hadn't already done so would develop nukes, and the USA guaranteed they would not be necessary. It's a small miracle things worked out so well as they did.

Eh, some European countries have nukes anyway
Answering Question About Your Documents Using LangChain (and Not OpenAI)
>How to use Hugging Face LLM (open source LLM) to talk to your documents, pdfs and also articles from webpages.
That's not a problem. Closed systems can do that. If they additionally do not exchange energy with their environment they are called isolated systems.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolated_system
It costs more than 15 football fields, laid end to end.
I think the question is, "has Blue Origin gotten anything into orbit?" (I don't know the answer, I think as of a couple years ago it was still "no", but then I stopped paying attention)
There's no way the drone would reach without breaking the law (or with you walking behind your drone the entire time).

Drone pictures are nice but most people aren't allowed to fly them in many places and even if they are, many densely packed cities have restrictions of their own.