skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hey, all the thanks go to you! I really wish we could do more to reward contributions like this when they're coming from folks in the academic world... the impact of this work is easily on par with anything else you could do as a junior faculty.

Have you considered setting up a regular search on GitHub to try to find public codebases that are likely using your library? That might be a great complementary set of statistics that you can use to promote the impact of this work.
And they shall make a computer of Dimethylphosphite molecules: 2 or 3 qubits shall be the capacity thereof, and a cubit and a half the length thereof, and a half cubit the breadth thereof…
That's not the only difference - there are many more facets of reliability guarantees than the brief hand-waving this author does about it in the article.
Even after browsing the comparison page, the differences between Pixelmator Pro and Photomator are not entirely clear. Possibly this is because of where they are in their life cycle.

For casual image editing, including photos, I turn to Pixelmator Pro most of the time. I'm not sure at this time how I would use Photomator. If it eventually integrates metadata management and cataloguing, then I would happily jettison Lightroom Classic.
The Quantenkoffer by qutools is an interesting kit for learning about quantum stuff [1]

Also, Qiskit pulse was fun to play around with (haven't in awhile, don't know what the current capabilities are) [2]

[1] https://qutools.com/quantenkoffer_science-kit/

[2] https://qiskit.org/documentation/apidoc/pulse.html
The package manager is designed to download archives (.tar.gz) of packages, not the composite files.
Sure. But I wouldn't do that for 1.0 of the lang. It sounds quite feasible to add support for that in 1.x if the community needs it. There's a reasonable path to upgrade to http/2 while spending more effort into what's critical for the lang to get to 1.0.

[Edit] And it's quite feasible to decide later that http/2 was never needed for this usecase.
Sadly, more and more, releases these days means U.S. only. Here in Germany, App store tells me, not available in your region or country.

That been said, Bing-App is pretty good so far, waiting to look at openAI one. Far too many fake ones masquerading as chatGPT apps and it is really painful to see my friends paying for some of these fake ones to remove adverts and trying to figure out how to make it do things.
I think the big issue is that adaptation is it's own special skillset. Being able to adapt an existing work in as faithful a way as possible while juggling technical, budgetary, human, contractual, medium, etc. constraints is a really difficult thing to do. And the problem is most people who get into making movies and TV don't get into it because they want to be adapters. They get into it because they want to be creative. They want to tell new stories or tell old stories in new and creative ways. So there aren't really a lot of talented adapters in Hollywood. The studios have an insatiable apatite for adaptations. They're looking for that built in audience and franchise potential. But the pool of adapters is small, and so they hire a team of creatives instead of a team of adapters.
Modern processors already ship with hardware that enables high quality random numbers.
I think ISO meetings are like this too.
What does spyware mean in this context? Some phishing-like cover websites prompting users to input their credentials of openai? Apart from that, I thought Apple handled permission handling well?
Japanese also don't distinct v/b and l/r so love [lav] is written as rabu (-u because with exception of -n they don't like to end word on consonant), thus "rabu songu"
Wheels Fall Off of WheelsUp; Another Startup Fraud
> whisper built in for record -> transcribe workflow

How is this any better that Apple's built in dictation?

> easier to ... delete history

This is actually the one advantage I see to this app. Deleting history on the desktop is a pain and requires far too many clicks. I can delete history more quickly with the iOS app.
Technically, it could be that's how it will turn out, if, say, they decide to re-release this image on July 1.
Umm, I added a readily available consumer CPU from a different company to your comparison chart.

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/5022vs5008vs5189vs5031/...
We can then train an LLM to generate it though
No, switch science is a legitimate parts distributor in Japan, kinda like Adafruit.
Cool, so I see you've rediscovered S-Expressions.
Sure, but GP was saying "out of scope" in a way that sounded like "forever, for this use-case", not just "for 1.0". I may have misinterpreted
I'm sympathetic to the practical concerns for partisans; these likely had basically no choice in the matter. They're operating out of their homes; there's nowhere to safely stash 50 Nazi prisoners.

That said, "the Waffen-SS does it too" is perhaps too low a moral standard to set.
I _started_ writing TCL in 2010. This was for EAD automation, and the software only had a TCL API, so probably just a historical quirk. But the company I was with had a lot of it to automate a lot of flows.
Embrace, extend, extinguish. A tale as old as any in computing (and more broadly, many other product areas)
Nuclear missiles don't need to be launched with <5 minutes of deliberation. Having an AI change it from 15 minutes (human time to review) to 15 milliseconds won't change a single thing about the outcome of a nuclear engagement. Worst case if humans deliberate so long they effectively accidentally give up the ability to "press the button", nuclear submarines are available for guaranteed second-strike retaliation.

Yes, AI will operate the vast majority of conventional weapons. But there's no advantage to having an AI autonomously launch nukes with no human order given.

ICBM's take 30 minutes from launch to reach USA. It takes about 5 minutes from presidential order until nuclear missiles are launched. We have a working latency of 25 minutes. We do not need 25 milliseconds, that will change nothing.
> the idea that larger models can do more than smaller models, which should be a surprise to no one.

Actually this was quite a surprise to a lot of people, since the whole race to scaling up began, with GPT2 or so. It was totally not obvious that you can scale up the model (and also training) and it would improve the performance. Many (most?) people thought there would be some limit, and we were close to that limit with 100M-500M params or so.

Then GPT2 came. And it was a surprise to a lot of people, that scaling up works so well. But then the question remained, is the limit reached now, or not, or is there any? The scaling laws appeared, and seemed to indicate that there really is no limit.

Still, GPT3 and then GPT4 were still surprising to people, that it really got better and better. But the question still remains, is there a limit? If there is no limit, it means we can easily surpass human intelligence by just scaling up further. Maybe the limit is just always current technical hardware limitations and cost.
> ISPs have different cache refreshing intervals

They're omitting the detail that ISPs are violating the spec.

If you set your DNS TTL to 3600 seconds, a caching resolver should store both that and when they received the response. Then, when another client requests the same name in 30 seconds, it should pull the result out of the cache and send it to the client with a TTL of 3570 seconds. This way, once 3600 second pass from the authoritative query, all the cached data is expired everywhere. If you know you're about to make a change you can lower the TTL to 300 seconds an hour before you make the change, after which the change should only take 5 minutes to propagate.

Some ISPs ignore the TTL and tell all their clients that they can cache the result for 72 hours so the clients don't make as many queries to their DNS servers. If you find your ISP doing this, stop using their DNS servers (or stop using that ISP) because it can obviously cause you problems whenever anyone changes a DNS entry and your ISP is handing out a stale one for you to cache for days. Maybe just never use your ISP's DNS servers in general.
This is just not true. Kagan and roberts almost never are the only two to take a side. It’s true that they commonly agree, but those cases are usually 9-0

I also dispute your claim that they’re not as partisan as the news suggests. Some of their cases certainly aren’t, but every single session now has multiple extremely partisan cases where everyone who knows which president nominated which justice knows what the outcome will be.
Look at gunjs to see what the web will look like in 2030
Don't get me wrong, I'm someone who prefers a browser over apps as well. I'll have to give their website a try again, maybe it's not an issue any longer.
I've got Verizon 5G for $25/month extra on top of my cell phone bill, and the tower is right across the street. It's pretty competitive with Xfinity's 1.2Gbps service since they didn't bother throttling it. I also get 350Mbps up. Seeing 15ms pings to servers in Sacramento from SF.
They didn't, they punted on their 230 case. The Twitter case they decided on the grounds that Twitter didn't "aid and abet" under the meaning of the specific antiterrorism statute at issue, and the Google case they sent back down without deciding anything on 230.

It's certainly better for section 230 than an overturn, but they didn't uphold it either.
If you communicate with people who don't use it, yes. In my experience that's the vast majority of official dealings.
No guarantees bc it entirely relies on your local ordinances, but it did work for me when the company was giving me the runaround about internet. I just asked for a landline phone and they had fiber installed within 2 weeks.
You could make a similar case about London, too, it has lost a lot of its mojo compared to the 2000s. The Great Financial Crisis has put a knife through its financial heart, and Brexit certainly didn't help. This recent [1] Economist article about the LSE showcases some of that gloom.

[1] https://archive.is/hDZsB
But at a science fiction convention, this is a smell.

Person1: Hi, I believe men can give birth.

ThisConference: Unacceptable.

Person2: Hi, I wrote a scifi novel about a fantastical world where men can give birth.

ThisConference: ???

At best the rule implicitly constrains its writers in a way that is at odds with the ethos of the genre under discussion.

It's not a left/right thing, it's just bizarre form of problem-creation. Like those devs who publish their shit to github then write blogs about why they ignore pull requests.

On a related note-- when I was little there was this dude who had a toy store and hated kids.

In all three cases, I was thoroughly entertained by hearing the complaints from these people about the problems they created.

NB: please don't respond to this comment right away. I'm about to order a pizza, and I have HN hooked up to a raspberry-pi phone I built where the notifications for responses cause the VOIP calls to drop out.
Inheritance is still absolutely a good thing to leverage polymorphism - but for that all you need are simple, shallow inheritance hierarchies. What has a deservedly gotten a bad reputation are ivory tower architectures with deep inheritance hierarchies that lead to things like the Abstract Factory Pattern.
Probably not, as the L.H.O.O.Q [1] is the literal textbook example of a derivative work, which would fall under the explicit protection of copyright.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L.H.O.O.Q.
Raspberry Pi CEO: Supply should be “unconstrained” in second half of 2023
Not just in theory, they can, and do, fail in practice.
Most of the software hackers I know (disclaimer: I'm a graybeard) got their start by making games. I don't know for sure, but I suspect that's still the case -- but now, the games are made using game engines like Unity rather than coding from scratch.

But I don't know. As an old fart, I don't have a great deal of contact with the kids who are programming. I simply assume that they still exist.

And now that I say that out loud -- that's a difference. When I was a kid, the older generations of hackers went out of their way to encourage and support budding young hackers. That's how I got my start. Maybe there's not enough of that these days?

Since I don't know any children programmers, I clearly haven't gotten off my own butt to pass along the gifts the generation before me passed on to me. I need to change that.
SCOTUS spares Section 230, rules Google, Twitter not liable for aiding ISIS
YouTube doing its best to get people to shift their time to Tiktok where (for now) you can skip any ad immediately.
Any resources for learning Fortran in 202X that don't bother going over the old cruft?

Last time I looked (admittedly, years ago), most resources seemed to be in the vein of "here's Fortran 1990, and once you've learned that here are a few chapters on F03 and F08, treated separately".

It'd be great to learn there exists a "Fortran: the good parts" sort of thing that just completely elides the outdated stuff.
Good point. I find it really reminiscent of how Alpha Zero ignored essentially all human knowledge about chess play, but still depended on insights into chess AI / search algorithms.

I think of deep neural networks as replicating long term memory/reflex rather than thought. I don’t know if that’s quite it, but they excel at a lot of very difficult AI problems when paired with just a tiny bit of handholding. Some of that might go away with even more compute, but I think approaching AGI is going to take more than just even more compute.
A lot less verbose than “if err != nil { /* 2-3 lines */ }” after every substantive line.
There’s a fuss because people want something for nothing. This is not at all surprising or interesting.
All that is up to the website to decide. This protocol is only for user authentication between the browser and a website.
> A lot of repeatable stuff via SSH

It looks like a use-case for fabric
https://docs.fabfile.org/en/stable/getting-started.html#adde...
It is the best of both worlds: shell pipeline for one-liners, Python — for complex logic.

Or if more declarative approach works in you case then something like ansible could help https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/getting_started/inde...
Warhol isn’t well known because he tinted some images but because he chose to use everyday subjects like the Campbell soup can which were then-under appreciated in art and society.

What gives art meaning is how it is a reaction to what was then in vogue at the time of its creation, but if you take art outside of its context, it seems superficial.

For a more relatable example, if you watch 2001: A Space Odyssey now, it pales in comparison to modern sci-fi works but for its time, it was a revolutionary piece.
yeah if you're on that rate and not dumping every penny you can into your pension allowance each year (and using up any unused allowance for previous three years), you're crazy.
How is this a hacker news?
That's chatgpt main function. What if we introduced a language that could be converted to another language that uses tool to speak to chatgpt.
Because you're the kind of customers Google wants. Not because you're paying for a service, but because you have shown that you want to pay for a service, which they can otherwise show for free with ads. You're the kind of customer advertisers want to see their ads blasted to. And trust me, while Google may not have ads for you now, it will happen eventually - and you won't see it coming. Heck, they might already be serving you to the advertisers in other ways.
>"Emergent abilities" in that paper is an extraordinarily poor communication of the idea that larger models can do more than smaller models, which should be a surprise to no one.

Nothing on the face of the earth can be a sum of more than their parts. It's called conservation of mass and conservation of energy. So based off of your logic how can the term "emergent ability" even exist? Why do we even use the term?

You're getting hung up on a language quirk. Abilities aren't being built out of thin air, the term "emergent ability" is just an expression for "unexpected abilities". Even you as a human are a sum of it's parts.

There's no nonsense being spread here. Experts and eminent researchers including the father of modern AI (Hinton) ALL use the term "emergent abilities". Are you an expert? Why is your opinion on this "spreading of nonsense" and why is it directly contradictory to expert opinions?

Clearly you have logic that these experts and researchers haven't thought about. Can you spell it out step by step exactly what makes you more utterly clear about the "nonsense" then the experts who in actuality claim they don't fully understand what's going on?

I'm not being sarcastic here, there is a huge contingent of people on HN who are totally dismissing LLMs and it would be a disservice not for them and you to not allow them to spell out their logic clearly. But what I'm seeing in your paragraph is just an investigation on vocabulary on what is meant by "emergent abilities"
At a point some time ago, I think around when Windows mobile OS was still a thing, they released a phone and a dock and you could use it as a desktop for modern apps. It was limited to apps due to architecture but that always seemed like the next step to me for many people. A mobile you could just use as a PC via a dock and run desktop apps on it. I think we will still see it, but it really felt like Microsoft was going to deliver years ago on it.
Here are the original Electrical Experimenter sources, which are in the public domain:

* February 1919 (The My Inventions series begins with Part 1, My Early Life, on page 696): https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Electrical-Experimente...

* March 1919 (Part 2, My First Efforts in Invention, begins on page 776): https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Electrical-Experimente...

* April 1919 (Part 3, My Later Endeavors, begins on page 864): https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Electrical-Experimente...

* May 1919 (Part 4, The Discovery of the Tesla Coil and Transformer, begins on page 16): https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Electrical-Experimente...

* June 1919 (Part 5, The Magnifying Transmitter, begins on page 112): https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Electrical-Experimente...

* October 1919 (Part 6, The Art of Telautomatics, begins on page 506): https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Electrical-Experimente...
It's been said before but can be said again, War is hell in a way that civilians generally don't understand. You have mass killing of civilians on both sides, rape, and abuse.
KNDJT2A23B7329809
> How does that make any sense in OOP?

OOP inheritance forms a tree, and that is the language of trees (parent, child, ancestor, descendant, sibling).

> Why do Java beginner courses still teach Inheritance like it was 1995

> Why do they teach Inheritance and later introduce "favor composition to inheritance"? Doesn't this just confuse everyone?

Codecademy's course introduces inheritance in module 9 of 11, and calls it "deeper object-oriented" feature: https://www.codecademy.com/learn/learn-java

> Why does Inheritance have first-class syntax support in an OOP language like Java ("extends") whereas Composition usually needs to be "engineered" using some more complex patterns, e.g. DI?

Class members absolutely have first class syntax.

DI is composition with IoC container.
It's interior. No ventilation. I guess it's ionizing the air and bringing radioactive dust particles to the whole room. The radiation level is still very low so I'm not worried.
You are definitely not "fine". The infringement has happened. The fact that you aren't going to be "caught" and sued doesn't make everything legal. Ask any artists if you make and hang a copy of their work inside your own home. Ask Microsoft if you can copy their "art" for use in your own home.
Yeah, but DSL won't have a problem with speed, and routers having too weak cpu to handle it.

GPON does.
Sumi.news
In a bunch of areas the companies rely on legal monopolies that were given to them by the local governments. The agreement was they get a monopoly if they agree to install phone lines for everyone who asks. If they don't run copper then the next thing they'll do is run whatever is their preferred equivalent. It's a quasi government+private monopoly agreement that benefits both and ensures residents get phone lines.
Would be interesting to see Apple show which apps accessed what photo and perhaps why!
The internet most definitely has 'regions' when it comes to laws and resulting potential liability.
That would only help if the the bottleneck of your algorithm is getting the code from memory to the CPU to decode and for the CPU to decode the instructions. But if your code is that big then it wouldn't fit microcode either.

Pipelined CPUs are insanely efficient at executing code at the maximum speed the execution units would permit, so having more complex code encoded in a macro instruction offers diminishing returns until it actually becomes detrimental because the surface area you could devote for general caches is now occupied for stuff that doesn't help all that much.
My first version was something like jupyter notebook https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQjBhsC3oi0

but I don't run it anymore. The one on github is a rewrite and it is closer to notion.

I removed the programming part, because I feel that a notebook is not the best environment for writing code. It may be ok for ad hoc programming, but for serious coding, I want an IDE. I may create multiple files instead of mixing everything together in a single page.
That's a good point. But IME, when people complain about inheritance, they're primarily talking about implementation inheritance.

Interface inheritance, used for polymorphism like in your example, is still considered a good practice and is not really criticized as much (an exception is when it is "abused" for other reasons, like in codebases that have one interface for every class, even without polymorphism).
I don’t think they intended to negatively affect power users. They convinced themselves that the new keyboard scheme is just as adequate.
Hermanson cautioned that “a single year doesn’t really mean anything.” Scientists usually use 30-year averages.

I know the word "clickbait" is way too loosely thrown around on HN, but man if this doesn't meet the bar. It's the 1.5C temp increase that's being talked about, it will be due to El Niño, and it will only be for a year (maybe two). As for the "clickbait" part, I refer you to the above quote. Oh, we're probably well on our way to hitting a key threshold, but that isn't what's discussed in TFA.
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35900907
I’m wondering if anybody has seen a way to represent mixed rich-text and structured data like tables as CRDTs?
I had a similar problem recently and in the end I went for TOML, encoding the path in the section headers (square brackets), avoiding any indentation.
You don't need non-determinism. If you know you are going to generate a number, just mask the output of the softmax layer to only decode number tokens. That's exactly what stuff like Guidance and Outlines (https://twitter.com/remilouf/status/1653765371273330688) do.
I mean, this could mean something, but it's hardly surprising that Epstein would have wanted to meet with him. Epstein met with lots of rich people, it was sort of like meeting with a salesman. It doesn't mean you like the salesman, or even are interested in buying what they're selling, it just means that the salesman is persistent and skilled at getting a meeting.

Now, if Thiel "bought" what Epstein was selling, or even just continued to meet with him after he realized what Epstein was selling, that would be a story. So far, this doesn't seem like a story.
Offer code 3KUU3