skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It should be possible to alter the case to support a slide cover, like for graphing calculators: slide it off, put in on the back when in use. slide it off, put it on the front when not in use. It should be resistant to puncture damage to the screen and prevent keypresses.

For LTE modules, as long as you have USB, you are able to connect one. If you want 5G, check the Qualcomm SDX55 and SDX65 (submm wave + 5G SA) on Telit. The easiest way is to get a Telit EVB + a Cinterion module.

The only difficulty would be routing the audio pathways and maybe IMS registration for VoLTE, but you could use a Quectel EG25 like on the pinephone: the module can be controlled by AT commands and the existing work for audio routing could help you get started: check https://wiki.pine64.org/wiki/PinePhone_Pro and the audio part of https://xnux.eu/devices/pine64-pinephone.html like https://xnux.eu/devices/feature/audio-pp.html#toc-voice-call...
I am also frustrated with Google Analytics but one thing it does very well (that I can't seem to find elsewhere) is counting unique unregistered visitors. If I had to guess this is done with some advanced fingerprinting - but I'd be curious if anyone has found an alternative for these metrics.
"It's never the right time to see if the backup generators can take the building load. "

How about a test outside normal working hours?

It is possible, to meassure the power output before and then plug in enough stuff, that draws roughly the same.

But yes, it is more convenient to not do it and continue buisness as usual and hope for the best.

My point is, that in most cases, you can test and fix critical stuff and also fix problems created by your fixes, if you make it an important issue and plan accordingly. However, I did not say it is necessarily easy.
That actually sounds more like anxiety about the relationship, and now that I think of it what I'm describing is more like a (very common) combination of depression and anxiety.
Prices are sticky and people are way more emotional when it comes pricing their home than other things.

Those who refuse to sell now are just keeping up the price for the ones who do sell. If the price is not sustainable ot will go down.
Wait, explain to me how a cop on the side of the road with a radar gun "endangers drivers"? If someone ahead of you slowing down before they get to a cop causes you danger, you were following unjustifiably close.

There are lots of things that can happen on a highway to take a car from 80mph to 0mph in just a few feet (very heavy things to run into) without warning, and if you don't have enough distance to react to that and stop, you are following too close.
> Though I do think eg Kotlin coroutines are probably capable of similar things. (but they are only recently coming out, vs BEAM which has had this out of the box by default for ages)

Most other green-threads end up only yielding on I/O; at least I've not seen any other system where instructions between yield points is bounded[1]. In that case, if you have enough green-threads things that want to run a CPU loop, you can lock up all the OS threads that run green-threads. If you have just one in a CPU loop and you ever need to do anything across all the OS threads, that could get you stuck, too.

[1] Erlang doesn't have a specific bound; you could make a really long function, but without a loop construct, you'll be forced to call a function eventually, and function calls are yield points.
My parents, others in my family, and a couple former co-workers have had a rental unit or two at one time or another. Exactly one of those didn't strongly advise against it, and that one said his situation was good only because he'd been careful to buy units where they were almost certainly going to go to nursing school students, who are likely to be relatively-stable, stick around for at least a couple years, leave before long if they can't pay anymore for some reason, and extremely unlikely to trash the place or try to run a meth lab out of it or anything like that. In all other cases the complaints are similar: the return on time and money invested is just way, way too low to be worth the risk & frustration.

But, none of those engaged a property management company. Maybe that makes the difference.
Lessons learned adding network multiplayer to a web game
MyHouse.WAD – Inside Doom's Most Terrifying Mod [video]
I went there in September of last year and really enjoyed it. If anyone wants to see some of it, I posted my pics in a blog post. Unfortunately it doesn't have many pictures of the computers that were hands on there, but more of the video game consoles. https://gglas.ninja/blog/2022/09/national-videogame-museum-t...
The joke that cost $2M: China imposes huge fine for comedian’s army-themed quip
Two comments.

First, this reminds me of this essay by Paul Graham: http://www.paulgraham.com/hs.html

Especially the second half of it, where he talks about all the things wrong with the current school system.

Second, I think the problem is bigger than school. Also seeing massive discussion on HN today: "Americans Have Never Been So Unwilling to Relocate for a New Job", "U.S. Depression Rates Reach New Highs", and "The U.S. birth rate has fallen by 20% since 2007". The US is having some kind of a crisis in terms of some of the fundamental things that hold a society together. (Though, arguably, being willing to move for work is not one of those things.)

America is actually having those issues. HN has talked about most of them before. But seeing them all together on HN today feels almost like an orchestrated campaign of "Hey, America, you should feel bad about yourself". It makes me wonder if someone is running this somehow.
See a data visualisation of your own personalised history of data breaches
Try

groff -ms -Tpdf example.groff > example.pdf

The difference is the use of the ms macro package. That package generates page breaks and makes assumptions about the page size. -Tpdf will typeset your text using proportional fonts, justification and so on.

The previous poster's command generated nicely justified text in the terminal (or redirected to a file).
> This has been a question I've had too. How do you get to show you have experience in enterprise software/tech if you've not been given the chance to work in a setting that uses something like that before?

Personally, I believe the answer is right place right time, as disappointing as it may sound. A large amount of people I know working these sort of roles are there because Company X in the domain recruited them from University pipelines where they attended and that seems to be almost exclusively where the companies source “entry level” hires for these domains.

I still think it’s possible to get there from somewhere else, it just requires slightly different skill sets and a lot more work.
If you're a high skill programmer that has domain knowledge re AI, you'll do very well in the future, whether 5 or 20 years out.

We simultaneously won't need and won't want the majority of software developers that exist today (the sheer number of them), writing code in the future. That would be a bad outcome.

They're going to end up more valuable as prompt wizards and checkpoint decision makers, because the AI will be drastically better at writing code (in all respects) than they could ever be. And they're going to get paid less because more people will be able to do it, software development will become a lot less intimidating as a field. It'll be more mass market as a field, akin to being a nurse (4.2 million registered nurses in the US).
The UI is awful, the functionality is not.
Reddit has a severe astroturfing problem. Any subreddit that gets any attention (or ends up in /r/all) gets hammered with socket puppets and astroturf campaigns. Groups can very cheaply buy upvotes for pretty much anything.

Reddit has shown little appetite for combating this issue because their value is the number of eyeball-seconds they receive every day. They want to report huge eyeball numbers you investors and advertisers.
SBF's biggest problem was that he got caught (and became famous) before he could do the work necessary to clean things up. There's tons of grey/hinky stuff that goes on inside companies starting up. These companies either die, get acquired, or professionals are brought in to clean it up before it goes public.

FWIW I think Sam is an honest actor here though. No real funny business with OpenAI.
What exactly does "open-source" mean to you? Because it sounds like there's absolutely nothing open about this other than a small scraping of LinkedIn data (which you should probably ask your lawyers if you're even allowed to license out).

The wording isn't just misleading, it's a complete lie.

EDIT: Nevermind, the title has been updated to accurately reflect this being a small datadump.
If someone slowing ahead of you puts you in danger, you were following too close. The parent was talking about encouraging users to use their phone to report the speed traps is a cause of distracted driving, which it is, which is dangerous.
It makes for an awkward situation

Well, yeah.

These kinds of questions are indeed extremely useful: for demonstrating quickly and plainly just how much a self-impressed asshole the interviewer is. And, implicitly, how asshole-enchanted (and intellectually shallow, overall) management must be for putting this person in charge of anything.

No need to put in a show of thanking them for their time on your way out. Being as they've already abandoned any pretense of professionalism by this point, you can issue whatever obscenities as you like, in fact. Either way be sure to thank yourself for salvaging the rest of your day, and for another bullet dodged.
True but DC is so backward and flatfooted relative to Beijing that he may be.
Dude, your whole energy is trying to shut down conversation and I already told you that’s not going to work.

I only knew the Pinkertons still existed reading about problems in the second gulf war, in which they were listed amongst the problem children. I thought that name was retired a century ago, turns out not. What I don’t know is any role they played in Afghanistan. Bracketing your base of knowledge is not weakness, it’s disclosure.

Also they all hire the same kind of people. Just because BP had the Deep Water fiasco doesn’t mean we forget about Exxon Valdez. There are no “good ones” just short memories and willful lack of imagination.

This is not high school debate class. Act like a grownup.
That is generally true. In other words, cities have more opportunities so people move there.

Paradoxically if you build more housing, population increases, opportunities increase, and housing prices increase.
Some of those posters look more like caricatures than renditions; I wonder if it's due to some weird copyright or it's a stylistic choice without ulterior reason.

Quite funny though.
This is Duedil + Company Check + Open Corporates.

Duedil and CC were (mostly) powered by Creditsafe data which is much better in Europe at least than D&B

Open Corporates sold their data to Creditsafe for low 5 figures.

Interesting point re DnB in Eu it’s mostly a license if the brand name and owns little of the data or the business.
they went to discords or mastodons
Ratio.
Because google analytics 4 sticks to the gdpr...

your analytics in 1998 did not...
https://search.gleif.org/#/record/549300MKFYEKVRWML317

(Not brands, but shows you subsidiaries.)
It's not clear why the Earth's oxygen has been somewhat stable since the Precambrian. If you kill all plants, oxygen goes away (reacting with reduced materials exposed by erosion and released in volcanism) in just a few million years. It could be an observer selection effect: if it had ever dropped too low in that time, we wouldn't be here now.
Connections Museum in Seattle, WA (telecom focus)
https://www.telcomhistory.org/connections-museum-seattle/
> What's the opposite of survivor bias?

Confirmation bias, maybe.
There is a strong, mostly unstated, assumption in this era that doing nothing is always safe.

I don't know how to fight that.
> The cost of housing in the Bay Area is a closely related problem, but the bottom line is that we have to let fire move through the coastal redwoods every few decades, and that means we cannot build tinderbox houses right next to those groves.

There are very few people who actually live among the redwoods. This is a problem that will take care of itself as the insurance policies of those living in the most risky places are canceled. This is already happening (it has happened to me). A far greater risk is the number of people who live in a WUI and are right next to coastal sage scrub, oak woodland, and chaparral. A lot more people are affected by this because these are the plant communities that ring many of California's urban areas, and many of these communities also regularly burn; for their health, they actually need to burn.
Birth control, yes, but also the existence of credible pension plans. If your survival in your old age solely depends on the family you probably tend to make sure there are several candidates for sustaining you.
The part in quotes is the lead's manager talking. By the time you're being performance managed, your boss, their boss, their boss, etc. know about it, and the higher you go in the chain the more you're just a line in a spreadsheet that needs to be eliminated. You're on a 100 person team that needs to figure out how to get to 97, and you're the low hanging fruit because you're already marked. What you (as an IC) assume is your boss being a dick is actually a vast mechanism behind your boss, including upper management and HR, pushing them to resolve the situation.
Off topic, but just wanted to say I love the way this guy has repurposed a github repo to be a blog. One of the most effective integration of aesthetics and functionality of minimalism I've seen.
Sadly not related to the 1990 NES Game (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pin_Bot_(video_game))
I keep wondering about the dynamics of Langton's ant within an infinite adversarial environment. The game I have in mind retains the standard behavior and movement patterns of Langton's ant. However, it introduces an adversarial component: upon the ant's first encounter with any given tile, an adversary determines the initial color of the tile, either black or white. The adversary's influence is constrained to this initial tile color determination, without any additional intervention capabilities.

The adversarial objective is twofold: primary is the prevention of 'highway' construction by the ant, and secondary, if the primary objective cannot be fully achieved, is to disrupt the 'highways' as swiftly as possible post-formation.

I do not have a good intuition for who has the upper hand here. The adversary can be deliberate, but its influence is strictly limited to controlling initial conditions of the board.

Maybe this falls under the Cohen-Kong Theorem, or a potential extension of it. I'm not sure whether that applies here since the adversary may provide a board with finite support or may choose to instead provide a board (or board-generating procedure) with infinite support.
Your 800 dollar paper weight can be sold for almost that exactly because Apple guarantees that the hardware can’t be tempered with.
> saying "It's a deeply selfish attitude for the elderly and obese... to expect healthy people to take something that might have a net negative effect to them" is eugenicist and antisocial.

Ok, but why? It seems like socially it cuts both ways. If I ask someone to do something they don't want to do and they refuse are they necessarily antisocial? How are you balancing the gains with the losses? It seems that your methods of accounting only value the most likely losers if there is no intervention.
Why do we need to regulate ai?
Lovely little thing. When you start selling cases as well, please can you set up a mailing list or post again when you start sending including case? Without case I am sure I won’t use it (blew up far too much stuff with static electricity in my life).
Sempervirens can reproduce without fire, but are healthier with a good fire now and again. My guess is that's one of the reasons the trees in big basin look sickly compared to the ones up north.

https://fireecology.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42408...
See for example this paid shill:

https://letterboxd.com/dr_challis/activity/

I'm talking ratings, not reviews
The lookup/hashtable can be viewed as a matrix which is accessed by multiplying it with a vector.
They said before the movie released that it was not their intention to make a franchise out of the movie. They were open to making a franchise, but the movie was designed to stand alone. In the age of cinematic universes making a D&D cinematic universe makes a lot of sense, but thats not what the authors wanted.

“It was never our intention when we came on board this film to make a franchise . . . I think that would cloud our ability to focus entirely on the film at hand. The cardinal mistake many studios make is to put the cart before the horse, where they start crafting a cinematic universe before they even make a good single film. So first and foremost for us was getting this right.”

https://www.polygon.com/23665427/dungeons-and-dragons-honor-...
tl;dr it’s fetanyl. Youths are adverse to drinking but have insanely easy access and willingness to do fet. I see more and more high school age kids joining the junkies in the streets of Seattle. It’s really wild to me to constantly see high school age kids choosing to join the standard homeless to do drugs all day
Are you suggesting that LLM can't produce novel output?
When you’re in organization with strict goals and no resource for public tests implementation you’ll have to make it up for correct information
An interesting perspective on Cordwainer Smith can be found in Robert Silverberg's "Science Fiction: 101." He reprints Smith's "Scanners Live in Vain," offers his analysis, and reminisces on how the sci-fi community buzzed over this newcomer's strange approach to the field.
I want a "forever computer" and I think this fits the bill. I don't actually expect it to last forever, but with unix command line tools we've got one lineage of computing that has lasted more than 30 years. I want to put a solar panel and a lora modem on it, and have a little computing device that will last the rest of my life. An artifact that will be as useful in 40 years as it is now, like how old calculators with nixie tubes still fundamentally work as calculators.

Might even try finally learning orgmode, maybe use vim-orgmode one it.
Periodically, I see this argument and I wonder if my work experience is really so unusual for tech/knowledge work. I do not consider my physical location as my value in negotiating or marketing myself. I've worked with people from many countries and never considered their current location to be that significant either. I managed to take work with me when moving overseas for several years. I eventually returned and work with several of the same folks still.

Working in academic R&D, I've usually found myself in "virtual" teams spread over many time zones or even continents, so the people I work most closely with are not the ones I would see in the office building and accompany to lunch. We were effectively embodying more of a glorified coworking space before any of us had heard of this as a named concept.

My boss always professed a preference for onsite collaboration but then was, ironically, the one most often away on travel or offsite at other satellite locations in our city. I could be in the office daily but not see him for weeks, going even longer between substantive face to face conversations. Most coordination was already digital before the pandemic.

At the same time, our division with a dozen or so employees is supposedly tight-knit and managed as a matrix org to share responsibilities. But in reality, logical silos are formed. Only a couple people pay attention to any one project and usually do so for an entire, multi-year project lifecycle. When we were onsite, we would spend most days in our private offices and not have a work-driven reason to visit one another.

Our group went from all onsite to hybrid with several remote-only. The rest agreed to return to the office one day per week on a day they chose by consensus. After a year of this, I can see that the locals often struggle to get quorum for the scheduled onsite day. We've also struggled to get our nominal quarterly all-hands get togethers to actually recur.

Fast approaching my 50s, I think more about lifestyle effects on my future health, or about retirement savings and the economy as a whole. I don't see that outsourcing of our individual "remote" jobs is a risk worth pondering. Rather, it would be whole companies or sectors as part of bigger trade wars or economic crashes. That is another kind of conceit to worry that our knowledge work could be out-competed by foreign workers while the parent organization and managerial layers are not also subject to competition from foreign companies.
I read this book too and it really drove things home. I remember after feeling a little bit unsure about the relevance of orthogonal systems, feeling the thrill of beginning to see and anticipate where the argument was going. It felt like I was discovering it for myself. I think there are lot of good math and physics books from the Soviet era.
When 10s of millions of your own money are at stake and depend upon how an industry is regulated you are most definitely not the right person to call the shots on how said regulation should be implemented.
Ask HN: How is the web effected by an AI generated feedback loop?
LLMs get their input largely from the web, as the web is increasingly generated by AI, how will this feedback loop effect their output?
Except the prices haven't actually lowered meaningfully. They're sitting at March 2022 levels, which is still way, way up from Jan 2020.
> making the minimum wage a thriving wage

What makes you say that someone should be able to "thrive" on the least-paying job? That's like saying that the dumbest person should be able to do get into selective universities, or that the weakest and slowest person should be able to win medals at sporting competitions.

Let me put it another way. Does $66k/year sound like a thriving wage to you? That's a little over $4k/mo after taxes. You won't be able to afford to pay rent, let alone buy a home, in any of the country's most popular cities, or take a family of four to vacation in Paris every year, or buy a nice new car. You could live in a smaller city in a less popular state, drive an older car, and maybe take your family to Disney World every now and then. Would you call that thriving?

That number ($66k/year) is all personal income in this country combined divided by the population; so that's the standard of living you could expect if all income was evenly distributed and it magically had no detrimental effect on the supply of goods and services. It seems like an extraordinary claim that the lowest income should even be able to afford a median lifestyle, let alone a "thriving" one. Perhaps I misunderstand what you mean by that word.
Comment from Reddit:

https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/13k74ro/optimi...

“Finally, a fortran package not written in Fortran77 but one trying to be approachable and maintainable rather than the product of unhappy PhD students spending many months to eke out a little more in an incomprehensible, Oracle-comparable mess.”
This is my experience as well, I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or not but exclusions never seem to work, at least when Windows is convinced it has found a severe threat. I have to completely disable Real Time Protection.
The exciting opportunities of getting to debug issues like this makes complex Kubernetes/microservice setups very appealing!
https://xkcd.com/927/ comes to mind

(in all honesty though I would probably do the same thing - GA is not my favorite thing in the world)
Not Invented Here (NIH)