skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The construction of the summarizing task is a bit odd. The prompt asks for a single sentence of output, but then the author complains that the Bard output is too terse. If I'm asking for a single sentence, that's about the amount of text I'd expect, not a paragraph of text mushed into a run-on sentence.

Especially if the problem is something as easily fixable as the wrong level of detail, I would have thought that exploring some alternative prompts would make sense. Given this is the prompt that the author is already using for a ChatGPT-based app, it's obvious that this specific prompt would work well there. If it didn't, they would have iterated on the prompt until it produced acceptable results for their app.
It is obvious there is no technical reason - computers have been able to take screenshots for around 40 years. The issue is the Wayland protocol thought it could get away with no provisions for sharing buffers and so its adoption was crippled while people discovered that they needed to implement a new Wayland+ standard or live without screenshots.

We're probably never going to be in a situation where someone can "implement Wayland" and have an acceptable desktop. The real standard to be implemented was written as part of the sway team circa 2018 (eg, https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wlroots/wlr-protocols/-/commi...).
Not quite. They're disabling printers today that were functional yesterday.

There's no HP cartridge to put back in, unless I go and buy one.

The printer is disabled until I give HP money. I call that extortion.
Maybe it's just because TikTok is being unfairly singled out, but I find the attitude of "they're just doing whatever other social media companies do" pervasive and dangerous. I think we can hate on TikTok and Facebook.
So just like the 2020 election, then? De-platform political opponents and mock them by saying "build you own platform, its a private company"?
In python this is natural way to do ranges, and in Julia you have to remember this pesky +1

In Python (C, C++ with whole STL) you could split in the middle, or at any M

[0...N)=[0...M)+[M...N)

You could split it k times at any boundaries, still

[0...N)=[0...M1)+...+[Mk...N)

Another important thing is that number of elements to process is exactly the difference between last and first index of the range

https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ewd08xx/EWD831.PDF
I went to the matter web site and followed the instructions to install the SDK on a raspberry pi. I didn’t measure how much space it took but it installed dozens (hundreds?) of packages; it is extreme bloatware.
The central dogma doesn't really cover the form of RNA that is speculated to be repaired here: ribosomal RNA.

The central dogma concerns mainly the transcription of DNA to mRNA, the reverse transcription of RNA back to DNA, and the translation of mRNA to protein. But over time RNA has turned up in a wide range of other activities. In this case, ribosomal RNA is the functional heart of the ribosome- the machine that translates mRNA to protein.

Ribosomal RNA represents a very significant investment of resources for the cell and so if it gets damaged, the cell won't be able to make proteins as quickly, or the proteins that get made might have errors, both of which have dire effects on the cell.
Telling the truth about the CPP and their absolute control of Chinese "private" corporations to spy and infiltrate their adversaries is not Sinophobia.

The general Chinese population are not to blame here as they are just another victim of the CPP.

Growing up my self in a totalitarian "communist" regime (none of them are communist for that matter, they incorporate socialist and communist ideas in their propaganda) I know there's nothing you can do as an individual to change the system and getting organized with other people is technically impossible, as the climate of fear and distrust is such that you don't dare to talk about anything closely related to politics among neighbors, friends and even relatives.

We know what happens to Chinese exec, artists and athletes when they don't play by the CPP rules.

Just imagine if in the US it was normal for people like Jeff Bezos, LeBron James or Jennifer Lawrence "dissappear" every time they confront the US government and the psychological impact that would have on the regular population.
All those were ones I saw first hand
Your response seems to miss the difference between the terms inherited and heritable (because it could be heritable without being inherited), but your point is valid: whatever she has may be cognitive, biological, or otherwise, and may or may not have heritable aspects.
.zip is not an inherent security risk.
I am just telling you what happened when I posted "What do you know about Edgar Allan Poe?" in Bard. You can believe me or not.
But the question isn't "can I do better than teams of quants who do this 100 hrs/wk and are supported by institutions with effectively infinity dollars", but "can I make money on this"? If I buy NVDA at 283, will it go up? There's no guarantee it will, they could lose their edge to AMD and the GPU market could bottom out, but barring some calamity, the answer seems to be yes they well. There maybe other stocks out there that are better buys, but they're part of the SP500 for a reason.
Many older stairwells in Europe (Italy/Spain/Portugal) are like this.

They're pitch dark, but you turn on the first switch which gives you enough light to reach the landing (and they are timed), and then you have to turn on another light, and so on. But if you don't get there quickly enough, it'll be pitch dark.
I'm sad that this is the second part and then the series stopped.
I thought whataboutism belongs to Russians /s

We should be looking into the a mirror, not greeting ourselves with the thoughts that there are worse places. This way inevitably leads down, not up, if we are talking "high moral"
Actually your interpretation of “Permanent disabling” is the grammatically correct interpretation here, because “if” is used. To indicate concurrent behaviour we need to see a sentence using one of these: when, while, or whilst.
Thought experiment,

Anyone every consider making a social media site/app like fb, tiktok, insta, twitter, where the user can control the algo, and or have sum input of the algo, in so much that the user can "control" what they see, still have ads [company gets paid] but the user can control those ads to a certain degree...[sort of like brave browser][but for social media]

Just wondering, not saying data collection is good, but perhaps, if it were more transparent and interactive, people would be more accepting to using and capitalizing on their own data. Value for value, the user gets to decide what data to share, and the company gets to push ads based on known algorithm unique to each user's approved data metrics... perhaps this already exists???

Is this a pipedream? Or a yes, yes, "if you build it, they will come" life changing moment? I need to know, it is important I change my outfit if it's the latter, athletic shorts and a tshirt, (in my opinion) don't convene much confidence when shopping around for angel investors... ;)
It's not a secret whose accounts are blocked or why, so what's the joke?
Rails has always been fully open source. If you didn't understand something you simply looked at the Rails source code. At the time it came out most people were using .NET or Java which were largely closed source and PHP which was open source, but there were no real frameworks at that time. CodeIgniter and Cake came out in the couple of years following and were both immature in comparison.
If you don’t want to be held accountable you shouldn’t be ceo at all, in my opinion.
"Using a non AT&T phone is not allowed in order to maintain the integrity of our phone system and to protect our intellectual property."

I was looking at printers a year or two ago and noticed that HP's were cheaper, but it was clear from the packaging they were selling "internet" connected printers & ink subscriptions. Those were immediate red flags to me.
And I could say you are overassigning individual agency to someone whose output is mostly a consequence of their environment, and how would we ever know who was correct?
I find that I tend to get to the interactivity parts of gamedev and go "maybe it'd be neat if this ran itself as a simulation".

ChatGPT even wrote a game for me and I thought the same then. I think this might be related to why I write so many dashboards as a hobby.

Spectating is pretty cool by itself perhaps?
Fixed! Thanks for bringing this up
Wow this is honestly quite good.

One criticism I have is that the web app is a bit buggy, I would also add different ways of displaying the "back cards" other than multiple choice.

I hope this does well, it is really useful!
Your comment reminds me of the Guardian’s piece on cities busing homeless from a while ago [1]. It was kind of like Defcon.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2017/dec/...
There was plenty of darkness on the Internet back in the 90s when I was a kid using it, and I grew up just fine despite having access to hardcore pornography, gore, and all kinds of disturbed people's writings. I do not think that targeted algorithms make any significant difference in this regard.

The "won't somebody please think of the children!!!" moral panic around social media annoys me. Hysterias about shadowy outside agencies infiltrating and subverting society usually annoy me in general, whether they are about Jews polluting the minds of good Germans, communists taking over Hollywood, the CIA being behind every revolution, shadowy Russians interfering in America's elections, or nefarious Chinese hurting American children by giving them access to information.

Such theories often have some grain of truth to them. Obviously, there are lots of different groups out there running actual influence and subversion campaigns. But I think that such campaigns are typically nowhere near as centralized or as effective as the subversion theorists claim. The subversion theorists frame things in a way that discounts the agency of the supposed targets of the subversion, and I think this reveals what many of them actually think about those targets. It is an authoritarian mindset. "I, who am obviously a good guy, should protect these pawns from having their minds by subverted by this other power over there. Only I, not those other guys, should have the power to control the minds of the worthless plebs."
Language Models of Code Are Few-Shot Commonsense Learners
These people can’t separate an idea from a side. They’re incapable of holding useful debate because all thoughts must be categorised as “us” or “the enemy”.
It provides no route for correcting ourselves and no tolerance for enhancing our arguments.
well, this is direction the world is heading in
What gets measured gets done.

The HN+community system appears to accurately measure value to its community. Of course we all knew that.
Meaning conventional sites (FB, Instagram, Snapchat, etc). Not the internet at large
this is.. not how contracts work at all. contracts in bad-faith or that impose unreasonable stipulations are not exactly binding regardless of a signature.

the question of course becomes whether or not it is worth it to litigate but that is another conversation.
Understanding WASM
With a slight modification, this basically applies to just about all security vulns ever :)
I would blame it a bit on standardisation… not too much, but when you drop the development of your own cpu, your own operating systems, your own hardware… you’re an oem like the others.
Why would it? Unverified and probably incorrect info is currently used, why would this change that process. The military is smart enough to not put all their eggs in an LLM.
It's not likely to benefit unless it's near directly overhead afaik. It's hard to use GNSS satellites at those angles, and if you have a wide open view then most likely you've got better angles to something closer in.
just in case https://archive.is/Uw6wK
>I absolutely disagree. Sometimes your only choice is fight or submit, and I would rather live free than die a slave.

Sometimes that is the only choice. On that we can agree.

Unfortunately when it comes to China that is clearly not only Not the only choice, but also the stupidest and most harmful choice to both sides.

Think about it.

>Conflict to resolve a dispute when one party is coerced is justified.

Whatever did China do to you? And whatever did you do to China? Mostly nothing. Just a trade war. I think China's biggest crime is attempting to get a GDP per capita bigger than the United States. Or stealing and copying technology being a big second. But China has been stealing tech since before the US-China rivalry so I think most of it spawns from the economic rivalry. These aren't legitimate coercion's, it's all dick size comparisons.

>And that is the point. When you say people, you are referring to Han people. That's the ethno in ethno-fascist.

What is this? That's obviously bullshit. So when it says "We the people" on the declaration of independence it's only referring to White males? That makes the US a ethno-sexist-corporate dystopia. Come on man.

Although the "All men are created equal" part of the declaration literally, refers to white males. It's written on a historical document. If I used this to argue with you to make the claim that the US is a white supremacist country of males it'd be disingenuous and lacking nuance. I am telling you that's exactly the kind of arguments you are parroting from the US propaganda machine.
Or check them out directly on the map: https://anvaka.github.io/map-of-github/#12.36/-31.74456/14.8...
And you are preemptively accusing without proof against users who are simply voicing their opinions like everyone is allowed to do here. Why are you attempting to act like an arbiter of legitimacy when you are clearly not one?
His Highness (2010)
> Xi is head of state as president, but not head of government (like King of England).

Uhm: the king of England (which incidentally happens to be king of quite a number of other territories that have yet to fully emancipate themselves from monarchy) is NOT the head of government in any of the the territories he is king of, but merely the head of state… which in constitutional monarchies is a rather formal show pomp role with very little political power. Conversely, the head of government in the UK with actual executive power is the Prime Minister, not the king.
Another trick, not mentioned, but demonstrated, is pandering.
I've got a tvi910+. It looks cool. Check it out: https://deskthority.net/wiki/TeleVideo_910 (that's a 910, but the 910+ looks exactly the same)

I switched it on in 2019. Probably its first run since the late 90s. It started up fine, but the screen was filled with junk - hmm, did it always do that? I tried to connect it up to my Mac using some dupont cable, but I couldn't get anything useful to happen. I triple checked the pinouts but I could easily have got them wrong.

It had a 6502 in it, and what looked like an EPROM. I put "investigate possibility of plugging EPROM into BBC Micro, dump, disassemble, diagnose" on my todo list, and I put the terminal back in a cupboard. But both items are still where I left them.
You're gonna need to backup your claim, because a quick google search didn't lead me to anything.
Biological systems are unnecessarily complex systems. This why the key to understanding ourselves won’t happen by studying biology, rather by creating AGI.

https://bower.sh/in-love-with-a-ghost
Yes.

Add that to America disintegrating into a low-trust society where one almost has to assume that any stranger one meets is out to scam you/get your money somehow and it results in a country where it's terrible to be vulnerable. Which is one of the ways we grow as people, thus leading to emotional stunting amongst the populace, which in turn makes us less resilient and willing to act (particularly since we can't cooperate anymore) and therefore in my opinion sow the seeds of our own destruction.
I have hit the front page 5 or 6 times just by sharing content I find genuinely interesting. HN users have a sixth sense that detects organic links vs automated stuff.
Commoditizing one's complement [1],

> demand for a product increases when the price of its complements decreases

Would this be a good time to sell value-added storage subscriptions?

An AI clone that remembers.

[1] https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/06/12/strategy-letter-v/

[2] https://gwern.net/complement
That's correct. Lua function calls are not that easy to remove, as function is first-class value in Lua so can be redefined at any time. To remove a function call, you need speculative compilation and OSR-exit, which is outside the job of the baseline JIT.
Hi, my name is Adam Day. I was interviewed for this piece in Science. If you are interested to learn more about papermills, I have a popular blog on the subject. https://medium.com/@clearskiesadam Also happy to answer any questions you might have.
I think you're fundamentally incorrect that a more consistent fine structure could fix the problems we have now.

The basic reason is that the US (and the Western World) has gone through deregulation to re-monopolization, so consumers face monopolies or oligopolies in most major markets and these entities basically make their money by selling their products as "services" in the chunk-size that makes a consume most desperate - IE, Hp will fight forever to sell 100 prints for $30 rather than 10000 prints for $120 and only hard threats can stop them (and we know the shit MS does - if MS could charge an ambulance a fee to keep their heart monitor software from killing them, they would, etc).
The total lifetime of the universe will be hundreds of trillions of years, which is perhaps a better scale to compare against.
Hearing stories about YouTube recommending conspiracy videos always fascinates me because my own recommendations rarely veer in that direction, if ever. But I keep to a pretty strict diet of gaming/speedrun videos and bass (guitar, not fish) content, so what I see on my homepage almost entirely adheres to that.

But then I watch one innocuous video outside of my core interests—say, washing machine repair how-to, or a clip of an old sitcom, and then my feed gets infected with Jordan Peterson or other weird shit and I'm like ah, this is what everyone's talking about! And I have to go prune my watch history until they vanish. It's bizarre.
Check this out https://github.com/anvaka/map-of-github#how-was-it-made - I gave a short overview there - does this help?
GPS doesn't work in dense cities without specific corrections because it reflects off the buildings, which means you don't know how long a signal took to get to you.

QZSS helps but the receiver still has to be designed for this specific situation.
Thx for the FUD salt. Rails never left, and neither did sinatra. In fact, other frameworks came to play, like roda. Ruby is ok.

Sure, jekyll is no longer the new hotness, but I don't see a market shift towards a single tool. There's just the usual fragmentation. Hugo, next, none of them is consensual.

Ruby was one of the primary targets of wasi. It compiles to WASM since 3.2 officially, but work started more than a year ago. Ruby in the browser is possible.

Sure, not everyone is targeting Ruby. But I don't see new products targeting new stuff either. Seems that there are less oficial SDKs nowadays, usually targeting the top 3 tier 1. And that's fine, and means little about Ruby in the end.
Questions, at Least
The frozen foods aisles at my local grocery store does this.
Really? That'd be quite a regression. I had a mid-range home color inkjet in the year 2000 that made color prints which were easily as good as local photo printers.

You had to enable higher quality prints, and use the special photo paper, of which they provided samples with the printer.

Oh and you had to wait about 5 minutes for a full page print, maybe 10. But people would say "this came from your HOME printer?" And there's all these little HP logos on the back of the photo, like a real print shop.

I was so impressed by the quality that I printed my first resume on photo paper, and was slightly confused when people were less than blown away by the appearance :-)
This kind of fear about large-scale communist subversion was common back in the 1950s too, yet that generation of American kids turned out mostly fine.
> And ... the Grace Hopper chip ... supports heterogeneous memory management

That is the point though, isn't it? Nvidia and AMD are converging to the same model, so it isn't fair to say AMD doesn't understand GPU compute. Nvidia just had a much neater implementation path where they hacked together something that worked in software while their hardware team figured out how to actually implement it. Technically it is arguable that they're behind AMD on general GPU compute, although that'd be pedantic given how thoroughly AMD failed to get their customers a place in the GPGPU market for the last decade.

AMD is floundering, no question. But the failure was understanding the path-dependent implementation aspects. They do understand that GPU compute is essential to the future of computing as an industry. They're clearly putting a lot of resources into that vision and they have been for around 20 years (similar timeline to CUDA).
Hear me out: LLMs should store their responses so that when someone asks them "did you write this?", even with modifications of the response they can confirm or deny. Since they are costly to operate, it will cut down on their abuse.
We build things with factories where the factory is orders of magnitude more complicated than the thing being built. Life build things via self replication at a microscopic level. Seems like a fundamentally different approach
That's what I'm saying, it always eventually relapses back even if you do, sometimes even after a single reply. Makes more sense to just postprocess it afterwards immediately.
Not really. Working on a 2+ year, large, monolithic phoenix liveview app at Spotify. VS Code runs dialyzer on file save, which shows type mismatches. I also run dialyzer on pre-commit for a sweeping check. Ideally, we'd have the same optional typing flexibility with a compile time check, but it seems like a marginal gain over the current setup.
Why not 100% Elixir, since it is more robust and uses less resources?
What I find interesting is things like the Atari Portfolio and HP 200LX could run their versions of DOS for quite a while on a couple AA batteries.
Apparently RTX4090 with FP8 is equivalent to worlds fastest supercomputer from 2007. So, in some sense I have a supercomputer on my desk:)
LiveLeak and Rotten.com were attempts to destabilize American democracy, of course. /s
loses too.
For pop songs, the fact that rights holders haven't been able to sue for copyright infringement (except occasionally). Owners of song rights are pretty effective at noticing if your song has too many words or notes in common with an existing song.

You might prefer a different definition of "different", but it'd take a lot of work to figure out how many there are by any other definition.
"LLM is fundamentally information processing technology. Not the path to AGI, not an emerging sentience."

I don't agree with this premise.

'This Time Is Different' because the LLMs have enabled AI to cross a material threshold.

The AGI hype is overdone, but AI promise, unlike just 3 years ago, will be fulfilled across a number of industries.

A lot of things are going to change.

Notably, I wonder if 'AI companies' will doing much of it, rather 'AI will be utilized'.

One thing is that 'help and instructions' are finally going to work for a broad array of applications.
This is really neat. Clustering of data like this makes for so interesting graphics.
Yes please. Just hope it's not a 5-slot card.
Why is there no open source firmware for laser or inkjet printers? (2019)
It passes WCAG contrast guidelines just fine. It has a contrast ratio of 7.84, and the WCAG AAA standard requires 7.0.

I find it very readable.
This must be the first time in history when the technical information in a software patent was actually useful.