skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Free speech shouldn't be a cover to hate speech

I don't consider "hate speech" to be a legitimate concept either. Hate is a perfectly normal human emotion. Government has absolutely no right to regulate how people feel about anything. People should be able to express their feelings, whatever they may be. Offensive speech impacts reputation and free association, it should not lead to literal prison.

> take it from Germany

No. In this context, Germany is not an example to be followed. I don't want to live in a country that feels the need to "sanitize" everything to the point of censoring swastikas from media.

If you're gonna delete harmful ideas from existence, I demand that you start with communism which has led to misery and tyranny in every country it was ever tried. Communists are in power screwing up my country this very moment. Until they're no longer allowed to walk our soil with complete impunity, I won't accept the banishment of any other idea.

> their actions ended up with riot, damage to public property, people injured and road blocks that prevented people to get medical attention in life threatening conditions

And that's the point where intervention is warranted. Doesn't justify censoring them either, just restoring order. Even Bolsonaro called for that.

> Paradox of tolerance

This "paradox" is actually a different formulation of my original argument.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

> I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies

> as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise.

> But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force

> for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument

> they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols

In other words, suppression by force is only ever warranted once the situation has escalated to actual violence. Exactly what I said in my post above.

> You mean the staff with heavily ties with the previous government, and that was suggested by them?

No.

> Were the people that invaded and vandalized the congress and the supreme court Lula supporters too?

I don't know, didn't see any footage of that.
UK Bankers: Social media firms should reimburse online fraud victims
Unilaterally taking heroin away from individuals (especially without investing in the necessary support structures) is also a wrong and doomed strategy (I think everyone here is familiar with the abject disaster that was the War on Drugs), so that's not very encouraging.

Government does have a place here, but it's in the form of banning hyperoptimizing attention/advertising algorithms and other business models that rely on precision crafted human manipulation, not micromanaging as a parental stand-in.
Are you saying you think we are living in the best possible world and you see nothing to improve? Many people feel otherwise, and they are the ones launching companies.
The same concept applies to so many things

One time, local-dialect subtitles completely changed a movie experience for me

It was an American movie. Where I was, they usually watch movies with english audio and neutral Spanish subtitles

This time, instead of neutral Spanish, they used local Spanish with slang… wow, what a difference in the way the movie felt

Having local language and slang can convey meaning and emotions so much more effectively
> You've created an imaginary argument for the sake of positing your opinion. You did however bring up willingness, which is an important consideration.

This is getting rather pointed and I ask you to consider whether it's just to be questioning my motives for posting. It's clear you think I've not addressed your argument, the civil thing is to attribute that to a perceived misunderstanding and not some desire to speak past you with my own opinion.
I think its interesting that you conflate sex and gender liberation with liberalism. In fact, most of the queer people I know aren't liberals and pretty much revile liberalism in favor of things like socialism or, to a lesser extent, anarcho-capitalism (you might conflate that last one with liberalism).

But also: having the opinion that certain kinds of sexual relations and gender expressions' morality should be re-evaluated is not the same as believing "do what thou wilt." This seems obvious. Eg, those who wished to abolish slavery before the civil war did not wish to abolish society. It is possible to want to reform without wanting to utterly dispense with every moral fact. I don't know a single queer person who expresses or believes in this kind of moral anarchy. Indeed, the very ideal of queer liberation is to assert _moral status_ for a class of people that have previously not had it, not to eliminate the idea of moral status all together.

In fact, the only place I've ever seen moral chaos conflated with queer stuff is among conservatives, who do so because it makes queerness seem more scary than it actually is.

I would like to pose a question to you. If, as you state, 60% of the population is ambivalent to or supports queerness, how do you distinguish this state of affairs from a genuine social evolution compared to what you are implying, some kind of sinister plot imposed by "them." If "them" is 60% of the country or even just 40% of the country, and, as you suggest, opposition is actually smaller than 40%, then isn't the acceptance of queerness just a social change like any other?
If you look at it from their incentives (serving you adds, getting you to use their products over competitor's, etc...) then it makes sense. Uniformity and Usability appears to be a secondary concern.
It's not a matter of getting paid less for the same job, it's a matter of not having the same skills or experience. Employers need some incentive to take a chance on someone with no employment history.
I ask it to explain song lyrics to me. While I enjoy listening to English songs, I often struggle to understand a significant portion of the lyrics. This can leave me feeling unsure about whether the lyrics are intentionally obscure or if it's simply due to a language barrier. Finding a solution in real life can be difficult, as I would need someone who not only understands the language well but also is familiar with the music, the band, and even the band's history. However, ChatGPT has proven to be an excellent resource for explaining song lyrics. It is able to provide clear explanations and even informs me when certain sections of the lyrics are intentionally left open to interpretation.
I prefer C without braces
This is kind of interesting:
https://www.bts.gov/content/estimated-national-average-vehic...

Exhaust particulate per mile has plummeted over the past couple of decades! By comparison, EPA stoves put out a couple grams of particulate per hour.

But, it seems like it's not apples to apples, because brake dust is metal dust, whereas wood smoke tends to be mostly organic compounds. Maybe the body is better at dealing with organic wood smoke compounds? We've certainly been heavily exposed over many generations.

Also, seems like there are some efforts to make electrostatic filters for fine particulate in flue gas: https://enervex.com/systems/particle-filter-system-for-stove...
> the typo “JavasScript”

You may be interested to know TC39 makes the same "typo" at https://tc39.es/ right in the biggest header on the page.

> Specifying JavaScript.

Hm, maybe it's not a typo?
This has been my experience so far. It seems employers/supervisors can sniff out when you really care about something, so they use that as leverage to take advantage: heap on more responsibilities without accompanying pay increase, cut benefits, delay raises and promotions, etc. I really wish that weren’t the case, but as a person who’s passionate about my work, I’ve encountered it at every employer so far :(

I’m not in SV so maybe the situation is different there
How much does the delivery person get, and how much is rent seeking by the platform?

I think reasonable thing to always consider is how many deliveries does average person make in hour and then price of each of them. And after that remove taxes and expenses. Now could this be lived on or not is sensible question.
PacWest Stock Sinks 25% After Disclosing Fresh Deposit Outflow
That's more of an issue for growth stage companies, not nascent startups.
“ Sleeplessness, suddenly missing work, constantly forgetting to eat day after day, breakdowns, MIA in meetings, really poor code, and more. This has happened > 3 times in the past handful of years.” everything you’ve wrote here is typical ADHD. Being medicated for a chronic disorder is hard and while the medication is hard,
It can signal the opposite - not addiction but someone who doesn’t want to take the medication to feel or act normal.

I also don’t feel that it is over prescribed. In fact there is a huge lapse and stigma would being signaled out as neurodiverse.

I would suggest to look into what is ADHD and typical symptoms and see how it overlays to a normal drug user non stimulant user. You’d find that it is 1:1 in what you described but does not correlate to drug user.
The "^" character is correctly named the "caret".
I'm wondering what the other ethical positions would have done when choosing between dropping a nuke on a city or going ahead with a land invasion. Neither of which has anything to do with exploitation, and everything to do with ending a war.
Localization and further customization is on our list of priorities, so say tuned. Thank you for your interest!
Video conferencing has latency in the 300ms - 1000ms range[1]. The actual network component of that is pretty small. And video conferencing software already has logic for time stretching/compression to handle variable latency - typically they'll speed up or slow down gaps between words and sentences.

[1]: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/24/12884
Might be in the minority but I have no problem with publicizing illness/disease. If it results in even a single life being saved due to publicity, or increased donation/research then I think the net effect is positive.
Which persona is Bezos? Accountant?
Grocery stores that serve prepped food and butchers…
The grass is always greener. Plenty of people become depressed once they stop working. The excitement of a hobby comes out of a balance with the struggle of work. Not everybody. If you like try taking extended time off to see where you land.
I'm sure they're the kind of thing that can bw ludicrously expensive, in part because they sound complicated/high-tech. Note that they can be really cheap, as in sub-£10 for A4 maybe even A3.

I just mean don't do much (or any) cutting thinking 'I should get one of those at some point' before getting one, as excuses for new tools/toys go that's a good & also cheap one!
> virtually nobody pays.

100% of the top 100 paid apps on the App Store pay the full tax. It's a progressive model, and the figure itself is arbitrary anyways. People want a more Mac-like distribution model, and Apple is reluctant to provide it because services are the only thing with wider margin than slave labor cellphones.
In both Chapter 11 (FTX) and Chapter 13 cases, priority tax debts are generally paid before other unsecured debts, meaning the IRS gets priority in these cases. However, secured creditors may still have priority over the IRS for specific assets.

I'm going to guess that the IRS is going to take the lion's share of assets.
> But from everything Elon has said on the subject, it's very clear that what he means when he talks about it and what I mean when I talk about it are not the same thing.

Not my recollection. This article is a good summary:

https://www.inverse.com/innovation/spacex-mars-city-codex

The article went back to some of his presentations far back.
Taxing automation could incentivise having people work jobs that could be automated.

We already have a lot of pointless jobs in the charade that we continue with.
> Ah yes we are all as wealthy and have the same resources as a famous hollywood actor.

People from all walks of life have been raising children since, well, forever. Rich, poor, smart, dumb; nearly everyone figures it out.
Sort of. Random writes are fine as long as they are as large as the physical write block size (not the virtual 512b or 4k) and there's a queue depth high enough to keep the drive busy. Unless you are lucky enough to have Intel's (no longer made) Optanes that give nearly 100% of performance with low queue depths.

This avoids the ugly read/modify/write, as well as much of the behind the scenes magic for minimizing write amplification and shuffling blocks around.
Neat - I was in the Social House this year during Hack Week. Hack Week is great but it just kind of adds to the whole notion that Miami isn't really a city to grow in, it's a city to come down for a little bit, do something, and leave. Very transient, almost too transient. I was one of 3 people in my house that actually live here, even though the house's roster was close to 40 people. Everyone was from SF/LA.
The numbers seem too large to be employee reclassification for reasonably-paid employees, no? I would think it's more likely the IRS is calling the embezzled money income and/or wages.
Tesla Cybertruck prototype spotted stuck in a field
There aren’t that many Cybertruck prototypes out in the wild, which makes every sighting quite interesting.
And why do founders voluntarily give everything away to investors?

Its not like founders are forced to. They can always be profitable and fund from their own operational cash flow
> what I’m saying is based on your hypothesis we should expect a population-wide boom in socialism

Correct, which is also consistent with observed data.

> unless there’s a specific environmental factor that exists primarily and only at the intersection of these demographics

I've described two - sedentary lifestyle and diet.

Even the fattest guy in alabama is probably not sitting in an office all day, and he's probably not cholesterol-deficient.

> maybe you could say, MacBook pros specifically are causing socialism

The difference is with endocrine disruptors we have a pretty clear causal model of the process.
This. I guess one of the main obstacles for the general Linux adoption is the lack of hardware with it preinstalled in the ordinary stores.
What's with all the middlebrow dismissals here?
I prefer to buy components I need, but buy enough extras to deal with failures or losses easily. E.g. if I'm buying SMD resistors (of reasonably common value & package like 4k7 in 0402) I buy at least 100, even if I only need 10. That way when I inevitably drop one or send one flying by forgetting to turn down the hot air flow I can just grab another. And 100 costs $0.56, 10 costs $0.14, so there's not much point trying to save money. When I run out of a cut tape of 100, I know I've used enough of them and I just buy a reel of 10,000 for $15-20. Lifetime supply, easy tracking.

That obviously doesn't apply to the more expensive components.
LOL this is some of the cringiest advice I've seen dispensed on HN yet.
As long as details are fully anonymised. I wouldn't have liked my disease to go public on Internet.
I think counteracting the market forces that drive exaggerated journalism would be far more expensive and difficult than simply developing some software to filter the exaggerations locally. Also, we can work on the first more effectively with the second in hand.
Hey, other dev on this project. This is a good catch, and we're aware of this issue. What it's doing is actually using a photo caption as part of the article, and we're working on removing the use of that in the summarization process.
Cinder and Skybison are different approaches. Skybison was a ground-up rebuild of the object model and interpreter, whereas Cinder is a JIT that lives on top of CPython.
Yeah I remember in undergrad I was working on using transformation learning to train an object detector. Basically you only needed 100ish images to get the model to detect that new object really well.

I'm not sure what the analogous term is for a similar process on LLMs, but that will be huge when there is a service for it.
Arrow functions have less-incomprehensible semantics of what "this" means. Though that's less important if you're not using the classes.

Most users just use arrow functions as syntactic sugar. But it's really good syntactic sugar.
is anything of value lost by suppressing youtube videos with thumbnails containing faces showing happiness > 0.9? i suspect not.

this probably functions decently well as a "europe vs america" discriminator.
On both android and iOS, a regular app can't choose to send packets over both 5G and wifi at the same time. Thats needed to setup a new connection while still using the old one.
The first rule of fight club is we don't talk openly about the meta-rules of fight club.
TBH I think this is a feature of human nature. It's impossible to impose your will and opinion at scale because you have to rely on other people with their own will. You can have small, curated communities, but you can't build Twitter without it devolving into, well, Twitter.

The entire concept of modern social media where every site wants to be everything to everyone is wrong. Even the "fediverse" gets this wrong IMHO. There's plenty of room on the web for all of us. Links are features, not a threat to your retention metric.
Would you mind open sourcing the browser extensions?

Something about installing closed source browser extensions with broad permissions like "Read and change your data on many / all websites" has always bothered me.

Too many have been bought up and then later injected with malware / ads / etc but that's totally opaque to the end user...
Yes, it's how the scam is perpetuated.

My friends - the level of naivete on this board is beyond pale: the 'gig' economy companies are absolutely founded on the principle of having extra leverage over workers so they can be de facto considerably lower than standard net packages.

This is the business plan.

Large companies have power over individuals, which is why we have regulations, min. wage and sometimes unions (and laws for unions). Even thinks like 'weekends' are effectively legislated.

So, by adjusting the terms of contracts, putting in fine print, especially leveraging things like lack of understanding of 'hidden costs' (aka wear and tear on vehicles), etc. they can eke out a profit where there might be none otherwise.

In a magical world where we could talk exclusively about 'excess labour' aka 'everyone had a full time job and wanted to make a few bucks on the side' - this might work out in some ways, but generally speaking, it doesn't.

'Gig economy' is toxic for the working class and mostly is just a giant wealth transfer.

The people creating and investing in these companies absolutely know this, this is their 'secret sauce' or 'IP' or 'special insight' etc. that makes it work.

I think much of it would survive if min. wage were required, but not all of it.

I suggest it's not actually efficient for middle class people to have 'gig servants' in most cases, the efficiency just is not there - again 'slack labour' notwithstanding.

Finally, we may be a couple of steps away from it working - notably, there are a lot of 'hiccups' that happen with delivery, such as people not present, addressing problems, bad food selection, etc. and working through a lot of that may bring efficiency across the threshold to where the 'grocery bill' is just a 'little bit more' because the delivery guy is able to do it very efficiently, and so the economics add up.

I think we might be there with Uber but I don't think we're there with Instacart.
Mojo Team Answers
I'm not sure where I read that but it turns out to be wrong, after reading a bit it seems noon is a good time but is also the most dangerous time due of the high amount amount of UVB.
When will such goodness come to JavaScript engines? I’m curious if there is some fundamental design flaws that made JavaScript difficult to optimize.
If you're reading your personal email or watching Netflix until your phone dings, you're not getting paid for it, but why would you expect to be?
I posted this elsewhere but it’s relevant here:

It seems employers/supervisors can sniff out when you really care about something, so they use that as leverage to take advantage: heap on more responsibilities without accompanying pay increase, cut benefits, delay raises and promotions, etc. I really wish that weren’t the case, but as a person who’s passionate about my work, I’ve encountered it at every employer so far. Because of that, my career mobility has come entirely from job-hopping (which I’m not a fan of, but I need to pay the bills).

I’m not in SV so maybe the situation is different there
Missing anti-matter may have a simple solution
Are you assuming “money” isn’t also the answer to this implied question?
Without looking at the article just by the headline - I guess it will be almost evenly split between Boeing and Airbus.
I don't think that Turkish Airlines are in great shape, especially with the new airport.
Wild theory - the elections will be close and Erdogan wants to bribe US and EU into not looking too close into his very close win.
lol, that was a typo, should have said "the sane defaults"

On the other hand, it's a testament to the comment being written (or at least edited) by a human, and not an LLM right?
> Content moderation is hard, but I'm not very impressed that the very first card shown got it (in my opinion) totally wrong

The authors are very clear that there are no right or wrong answers. Interpreting it that way misses the entire point of the exercise.
The FTX bankruptcy will now probably be converted to a straight liquidation. The current management has the fantasy that they can emerge from Chapter 11 reorganization as a going concern. Not likely. There's no ongoing business worth continuing.
Kind of! In my fork I run microbenchmarks on each PR. So you can see on, for example, https://github.com/tekknolagi/skybison/pull/456, that the change had a 3.6% improvement on the compilation benchmark. If you expand further, you can see a comparison with CPython 3.8. Unfortunately Skybison is still on 3.8.
Traveler Attaches Camera to Suitcase to See What Airport Does with Luggage
Sounds like an argument against utilitarianism in general. If you're forcing people to make train trolley kind of choices, then every ethical position is going to sound unappealing. I still don't see where effective altruists and longtermists are advocating for more sweat shops and slaving away in cotton fields.
SoftBank Vision funds post record $39B annual loss
This is unnecessarily presumptive and negative. They have a simple question - and that doesn't mean they didn't try it out to see how it works from the user side of things.
This means delaying starting a family, and those previous years 10 years is vital for fertility as well, which discriminates against women.
You could just read the Financial Times.
For thumbnails, ask and ye shall receive -- Clickbait Remover for Youtube:

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/clickbait-remover-...

Further discussion on HN:

https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Anews.ycombinator.com+...