skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The lit-plugin in for VS Code offers syntax highlighting, jumpt-to-definition, etc: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=runem.li...

Prettier already supports HTML in html`` strings, likewise, CSS.

> Is there a way in Lit to write the templates in regular HTML rather than a string?

This would require a compiler. You would need to load the HTML into the JS module graph and JS can't do that yet, though there is a proposal for it: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposal...

Template in HTML also have the problem of the data not being in scope as it is in JS, and there not being an expression language. So you ned up having to re-implement a lot of JS embedded into the HTML syntax, which then preferences a compiler-based approach to make fast. It turns out to be a lot simpler to embed HTML in JS.
OK great, then we agree that the current administration should enforce the UFLPA and seize most solar panels which are attempting to be imported into the US.
Plus one to you too.
I've had both Apple and Lenovo laptops over the years and both seem to perform similarly on my mixed 2.4GHz and 5GHz network. Lenovo have always been Intel WiFi chips whereas Apple seems to go for other brands such as Broadcom. I find it's the WiFi AP side of the equation that makes the biggest difference and not necessarily the laptop itself. I've gone through different WiFi APs over the years and the differences between the bad ones and the good ones is night and day. The good ones just works with all devices, and ensures each device gets a fair share of traffic. Good ones include Ubiquiti, Ruckus etc. Netgear Orbi has been pretty good too and is my current setup.
> You will be hard-pressed to find a racist that denies that men are more likely to commit murder than women.

What I'm saying, doesn't require that.

What I'm saying is if demographic factors are fair game for immigration restriction, there's one very clear one that is often overlooked by racists.
Great work, the space needs some more tooling in this direction.
Consider "violence island", we find a isolated place and allow the violent to express themselves together.
Yet the truly poor are subsidized with food stamps and subsidized housing. Poor people in West Virginia (a large amount) generally don't kill each other. What am I missing?
My concern would be the potential for an alignment issue. The agent directs it's eyes to look at you - because it's communicating something accurate about the plan it's formed about how to cross the intersection? Or because it's been trained to look at people when it crosses intersections, but communicating isn't it's true objective?

(I'm not trying to imply the agent may fool you into crossing so it can mow you down, the case of "AI incompetence" so to speak is more concerning to me then "AI malice".)
I’ve used paramiko for this also: https://www.paramiko.org/.
Well, societies used to do that. It was called the Death Penalty. Not saying it’s a good or bad thing but…
Whenever they focus on race as a useful predictor for criminality. It's dwarfed immensely by the sex difference.
This is fair, typically I supply data as compact JSON but ask for responses as pretty printed JSON which is quite a large token penalty but tends to strongly reduce malformed JSON outputs.
I suspect the sarcasm went over your head.
In my mind I was comparing versus the alternative stated of buying a generator & fuel for it. The generator will be up-front pricier, weightier, and bulkier, by far on each count. So it still seems like a huge win to me versus what's available now, if the use case is as described.
Yes, and also the fragment. But what I’m referring to is that the state machine needs to manage burning the stack (e.g., clicking a ‘Done’ button on wizard would take you back several pages). When the user hits back they should be able to naturally affect the state machine and also to eventually leave the page to its referrer if they go back far enough
This is quite apparent if you have experience with the criminal justice system. When there is a conviction in federal court, the Bureau of Prisons creates a pre-sentence report (PSR) listing the convictions, arrests, etc. These are incredible to read. Not only are there usually prior convictions. But in many cases, there are outstanding arrest warrants for crimes other jurisdictions won’t even bother prosecuting as a result of the conviction.
An idea of penal colony is idiotic (sorry to break HN rules), but why not long term prison.

I wonder if it could be codified into law. "If you've been responsible for x% of convictions, we will imprison you for increasingly longer periods", or "Top 1% of people when sorted by number of convictions will get a long-ass sentence the next time they get convicted."...
It's an analogue of rational market theory: no asocial choice can be rationalised as a good long-term plan so there must be externalities which are causative.

I don't believe in rational market players with full knowledge and equal information any more than I believe all violent men had externalities which were causative.

But I do believe poverty and epigenetic influences can exist.
How does the value of reduced immigrant crime stack up against the cost of skewing the sex balance in a country?
But we have lithium now.
This happened to me every week or so, not entirely predictable, on a small website that supports only a handful of users. Being an enterprise site with some corporate backing it's on quite a decent server, but it wasn't a match. The DDOS would leave things in a semi recovered state at best.
One issue with that is that people tend to come in pairs. What good is it to the couple if the woman can immigrate but the man can't?
https://spectrum.ieee.org/transistor-density

Interpolate out and we'll be at a mole in 1-2 years
The most obvious solution to this problem is to direct prosecutors and police to focus all their efforts on violent crime prevention.

However, this avoids the problems associated with harmful nonviolent crime, such as the fraud scams targeting the elderly and other vulnerable populations that you've probably seen on your social media feeds, messaging apps, etc., let alone things like crypto coin scams and subprime loans and on and on.

Of course, eliminating all nonviolent drug abuse issues from the criminal docket and passing them on to the public health infrastructure (see Portugal) might free up resources to deal with both violent crime and property fraud.
I’ve raved about the Model 100 before. Even with a 40 column screen it was perfectly usable for messaging on remote systems.

One of the clever things it had was two holes in the back. They were (by design or happenstance) perfectly sized for regular pencils. You cut the pencils to your desired length, shove them in the holes and use the erasers for rubber feet. Perfect to get the angle just right.

M100 had one of the best keyboards I ever used.

And to be fair, the 40 column display is much more reasonable for this form factor. 80 columns gets pretty small, pretty fast. Nice thing about text based web pages and word processing documents is that they wrap just fine to 40 characters.
You know what they say. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I would expect that if that were the case we would have long noticed certain paternal lineages having all the aggression.
I mean, yeah, this is kind of obvious if you think about it. The majority of violent crime in the US is committed by black people, so inherently a marginal increase in any other ethnic group (including hispanic) would (on expectation) lead to a decrease in per-capita violent crime, unless illegal immigrants were more violent than legal immigrants (which we have no evidence of).
Immigration? I'm pretty sure there are enough problems with locally born men who are criminals. Immigration is but a drop in the bucket when it comes to problems.
You're ignoring any growth in invested value during inheritors' lifetimes.
If anyone’s wondering this is totally incorrect. In fact any guide for posture correction on the internet will recommend tons of focus on body awareness until you retrain movement patterns.
Ah yes let's take stack ranking and apply it to society, that'll end up great
Violence perpetrated ON immigrants however, would inevitably rise since the same statistical validity applied to most women being the victims of violence.
How do we discriminate on what use cases are acceptable or not? How do we prevent arbitrary sites from abroad soaking up gobs of very exact detailed government signed data?

I don't see the active question as: are there valid uses? Maybe. Perhaps. But how can we create a tech so overpoweringly capable of destroying privacy at such a large scale responsibly, in a way that doesn't have horrific side effects?
this is fascinating.. thanks for the insight!
That's actually happened at least once in history [1]:

> Convict women in Australia were British prisoners whom the government increasingly sent out during the era of transportation (1787-1868) in order to develop the penal outpost of New South Wales (now a state of Australia) into a viable colony.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convict_women_in_Australia
That is pure word salad. are you a gpt?
if they went back before 1973... you know, say, 1939... might have some different statistics about who is responsible for violence in Sweden.
“Anything too stupid to be said is sung.” - Voltaire
> In other words: trigger warnings are counterproductive in that they cultivate sensitivities instead of counteracting them.

Or, they give people with a sensitivity a moment to fortify themselves, or delay reading/looking until they know they'll have a moment where they can afford to get a little derailed. Of all the people I know who value trigger warnings/content warnings/content notes and use them to adjust their own behaviour, exactly none of them use them to avoid their triggers 100% of the time. I'm sure such people are out there, but they're a small minority. Rather, they make mental distress a little more predictable and easier to navigate.

Your advice to seek out exposure to the sensitivity is, as a sibling comment says, perhaps better done under supervision a little more professional than a HN comment, but more importantly, also suggests a certain mindfulness about managing the sensitivity. Getting exposed to the sensitivity might well decrease its pull, but getting surprised by the sensitivity is more likely to re-traumatise.
Then they will reveal the real reason they oppose immigration: to reduce competition of their genetic in-group with other groups.
IEEE

https://spectrum.ieee.org/transistor-density

Interpolate out and we're close to 10^23
Given that everything is just microcode anyway, it would be really interesting if some (ex Intel) took their design and only switched out the instruction decode to decode ARM (or whatever) instead.

You probably mean uops, but that thought has also crossed my mind in the past --- a multi-ISA CPU. They could add the decoders for other ISAs, along with extra GDT descriptor types for "ARM mode", "RISC-V mode", etc. segments like they did with V86. It's not a new idea either, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEC_V30#ISA_extensions could execute both x86 and 8080 code and of course ARM has cores with the triple-mode ARM32/Thumb/Aarch64 ISAs.
I like the slab form factors (One of my first portable computers was a Tandy Model 100) but I cannot understand how someone uses a keyboard that ...doesn't have at least all the letters and numbers and period/backslash/colon etc... especially for programming!

I mean I get by reading a bit from the hackaday post that there are combos or 'chords' and so I guess you are meant to memorize these chord claw combinations for things, and yes I see the videos of people claiming it can be fast etc etc but....

man I just don't get how someone could just unlearn the muscle memory of a normal keyboard layout. I had a partner with a Spanish layout keyboard macbook where a just a few keys are mixed around compared to ANSI and even after sitting with it many times it was still nearly un-useable for me... and that was just a few keys swapped around!

I have noticed all the people building and using these reduced-key-count keyboards on youtube are all very young people. So maybe it has something to do with still having a pliable brain and not having decades of muscle memory to get past.
What is always tricky about any attempt to use statistical prediction on something rare like criminality is that you have two things that are both true: the vast majority of crimes are committed by men, AND the vast majority of men are not criminals.

So what do you do with this information? If a crime is committed, you can guess with some accuracy it was likely committed by a man, but you can't arrest a random man and think he is likely the criminal.

Any attempts to preemptively limit male behavior is going to affect a lot more innocent men than guilty men.
Thanks for the name "Martingale", I had wondered what this was called since an old gambler I met on a contract about 10 years ago described 'his' system.

After a quick wikipedia rabbithole, I now grok the St Petersburg paradox, which is fascinating - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Petersburg_paradox - but mostly tells me that the 'expected value' is not a good measure of whether you should bet on something, because games can be constructed in such a way that the expected value is infinite, but the chances of you even getting your stake back even at a $16 buy in are 1/8...
Every single bayesianism advocate is aware of this. It's so obvious that it's implicit - there's simply no need to state "95% of crime is committed by men"; this is completely uncontroversial and does not need to be discussed. The controversial part is applying bayesianism to other, more politically sensitive predictors.
Controllers are a much simpler way to hook a component's lifecycle than hooks, and I'm referring to the implementation and conceptual load.

A hook system takes some doing to build, controllers work like:

connectedCallback() {
this.controllers.forEach((c) => c.hostConnected());
}

References from host to controller and controller to host are simple JS references that you can directly see in the debugger.

The React custom hook is a bit shorter, but it's only 13 lines vs 17, and I think hooks are harder to understand because of how much is happening under the hood and the fact that for some reason you need two separate useEffect() calls.
But it does have cultural significance. Filipino dishes are served with a fork and a spoon, not with a knife as is common in the west, or chopsticks as in some other Asian cultures. It is a very culturally specific thing, and something that hopefully is written somewhere. If not, maybe this little conversation will do the trick and be referenced ages from now
The brain creates the function of the mind.

The mind doesn’t experience a collapsed state, it is a collapsed state. And from that collapsed state, we experience all other collapsed states through the same brain function.

The brain uses our senses to collect the probabilities that exist in the world, and the brain collapses those probabilities into a single “point”.
The drama was never about the level of Amazon's contribution to Elasticsearch. Whether they had opened 1 PR in the project or 1 million, the end result would be exactly the same – they wouldn't be allowed to offer it as a hosted service because it would be prohibited under the Elastic License/SSPL. Same goes for every single contributor to the project other than Elastic Co.
Training and inference on GPUs significantly underutilize …the GPUs. So tuning and various tricks need to be applied to achieve dramatic performance gains. If I am not good at cooking, giving me a larger kitchen will not make me faster or better.
https://archive.is/Vyo5Q
Thanks very much for posting this! I haven't yet finished reading the whole thing, but even just the first section about the history of LLMs, explaining some of the basic concepts, etc., I found to be a very well-written and useful info, and it was really nice that it linked out to source material. So many times when you go into reading stuff about the latest AI technique or feature it can feel like you need to do a ton of background reading just to understand what they're talking about (especially as the field moves so quickly), so having a nice simple primer at the beginning of this doc was most appreciated!
Meanwhile, homicide rate for men in Germany is about 2 per 100k. This shows that socio-economical factors easily explain the differences.
The article is mostly about demographic analysis of violent criminals, comparing groups of population by number of violent convictions they have: high (> 10 convictions), medium (3-10), low (1-2), or none. The title here is... not really what the article is about, but it feels like someone tried for a punchier title than "demographic analysis of violent criminals" and missed the mark completely. I'm not sure I can even call it clickbait, since the main reason why the 1% = 63% is brought up at all is a half-baked "why we should care about this demographic analysis" and not really explored any further.
Paying these ransoms should, in fact, be criminalized. If it was, the attacks would basically go away.

Even if you assume some ransom payments would still happen under the table, the amounts would have to be drastically lower (there's a limit to how much can be hidden on a company's balance sheet) meaning much less profit for the hackers and less incentive to attack.
Because it gets boring.

You're looking for a feeling of excitement, to really feel alive.

After the initial rush, that feeling fades. So do your chances of finishing the project.

Recognize that rush/excitement/feeling alive WILL NOT come from your project.

Disassociate that feeling from the project.

Then you'll pick projects far more stingily.

And then you'll finish one of those projects.
You also don't hear people claiming that this disparity is due to sexism.
It's a statistical thought experiment, nobody (who is sane) is claiming that it would be a good thing.
Mars. I think it was sorta that in The Expanse? (Only saw series)
I don’t have a problem with calculus, I’m just expressing its limitations. Using calculus to know the area of a circle is useful but it never really measures the area of a circle because the area of any circle is infinite.
Even so, being male is a very weak predictor, since only a few percent of men are violent criminals. (And yes, that implies that race is an even weaker predictor.)
Ask HN: How can I profit from climate change?
Climate change is a major factor that will shape the future of the global economy and society. The UN says we need to act urgently to avoid the worst impacts by cutting emissions by 2030, but that seems unlikely. Some investors are focusing on the winners of the green transition, such as clean tech or renewable energy, but the real money is in shorting the losers.

Which companies or industries are most vulnerable to the physical, regulatory, or reputational risks of climate change and will likely go under in the next decade? How can we find and short them effectively and efficiently? For example, airlines, ski resorts, coastal real estate, or agriculture? And no, oil companies are not an option because they seem too resilient and diversified.
This was an economic problem as much as punishment. If they really only wanted to reduce the crime, since most transportees were subject to capital punishment (I think the value was absurdly low, some figure less than a pound value in theft attracted a death penalty) they could have just killed them.

The point was to extract value from their labours, elsewhere.

Also, Australia v1.0 was Carribean/USA v2.0 if the UK/US war hadn't ended transportation to sugar and tobacco plantations they'd have continued supplying Jane Austen with plots (Mansfield park)

Subsequently it was political: pre union protosocialist chartists, Irish independence players.
This would have some extremely interesting population-level genetic consequences if it was accompanied by some sort of social change to allow polygyny. In particular, it would reduce the correlation that exists across all adaptive traits due to assortative monogamous mating patterns. Right now, all "desirable" traits like health/intelligence/strength/etc are strongly correlated, but when you reduce the strength of assortative effects, the correlation weakens significantly.
> Geography plays a role: every married guy I know lives 3 streets over from his mother in law, I think actually it's more common for couples to be near the woman's family.

In terms of physical distance, our order is: (1) my father, (2) her mother, (3) her father, (4) my mother. None of them are that close – my father is about an hour away; for her mother, add about 10 minutes; for her father, add 20; my mother lives 3–4 hours away. At least they are all in the same general direction.

In terms of how much we see them, the order is: (1) my father, (2) her mother (although only a little bit less than my father), (3) my mother (a lot less than either), (4) her father (we haven't seen him in > 18 months)

Seeing her mother more than her father, and seeing my father more than my mother, is mainly due to the quality of relationship each of us has with the respective parent.
> Also to my great disappoitment none of those CPUs has checked overflow for arithmetic operation.

Yes - we're stuck with the historically convenient collection of operations and types. Our CPUs are amazingly fast but very little smarter than decades ago.

Backwards-compatibility pretty much locks us into the same logical space. At least when people were designing new and amazing computers using actual wire (!) they felt free to implement what they thought would be useful, not just copy the existing model.
There are multiple places along the US Mexican border that are both easy to cross and don't have any sort of fence. Usually the large fence just stops. If you cross in those locations you are immediately asked to wait in line for a bus to be taken to a detention center where you are given an I-94 and an NGO funds your bus ride to New Jersey and New York where you will work under the table for cheap and skip your immigration court hearing. If you DON'T want to get caught, it is harder, since the border patrol knows where the crossing areas are and the terrain is more hostile although less patrolled.
Excellent point, I hope we can apply this to all demographic factors.

However, if we are limiting people based on potential for violent criminality, one category leaps out for effectively applying restrictions to, and that's men.

I'm totally against applying those limits based on potential violent criminality, however.
> Has succeeded in what?

As TFA puts it, building a "bonafide open source" project.

How is it half dead? Just because it doesn't have the latest shiny features that Elastic has? Was Elastic useless before?

OpenSearch is Apache 2.0 licensed. Why shouldn't it be called "open"?
> hey shy away from the pure fact that violent crime is almost exclusively perpetuated by men

[citation required]
Interesting, I must have lucked out quite often and got the first printing back in the mid to late 2000s since back then virtually all of my print Springer books I bought back then were sewn-bound.
Kind of. They used the comments to show the decision had some supporters, but even with the fakes the majority of comments were in favor of keeping the Obama era net neutrality bylaws. Still, the FCC ended net neutrality.

So yes they used the comments to justify their decision, but calling it a "wholesale manipulation of our democracy" is an overstatement as the decision never required democratic consensus.
Absence of near-ambient superconductivity in nitrogen doped lutetium hydride
Why idiotic? Are there examples of bad precedents?
Manhattan. Pretty sure I saw a documentary on this once.
Essentially:

1. Keep sentences short.

2. Use appropriate vocabulary.

3. Engage your audience with a captivating beginning.

4. Prefer active voice.