skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://global.toyota/en/company/vision-and-philosophy/produ...

> The Toyota Production System (TPS) [..] is based on the philosophy of the complete elimination of all waste in pursuit of the most efficient methods [it] has evolved through many years of trial and error to improve efficiency based on the Just-in-Time concept developed by Kiichiro Toyoda, the founder (and second president) of Toyota Motor Corporation.
This is why I park in front of my neighbor's house. :)

While I don't do that, I do always use a nearby neighbor's address for my Google Maps directions. I'm sure Google isn't fooled but it amuses me.
If you can't trust the other party, you have already lost.
Salmon sharks are warm blooded and can stand temps down to about 36 degrees. I wonder if they have any adaptations in their gills to prevent heat loss or if they don’t care because they warm their bodies.
Haven't read the article, but I wouldn't be surprised if it is taken as a percentage of the bank's uninsured deposits specifically to encourage banks to have less uninsured deposits, strengthening the resiliency of the banking system...
> Pharo should work on Windows

Wait, what? We're talking about Linux. Pharo Launcher also, obviously, doesn't display anything, so how could I do anything there?

> report it on the issue tracker with more details.

No.

> You should not generalize in this way.

Sorry, that was too much, you're right. While it is an exact quote from a member of the community, of course it doesn't mean everyone there is that bad.

Good to know that some people have a bit of a common sense. Congrats.
There is no need to come up with a new term, they already exist. You call the group what they want (e.g., Dine’e, tribe name, etc.), or indigenous American if referring to several groups.

You may be shocked to learn that many indigenous groups are perfectly ok being called American Indians, and some don’t like the term Native American[1].

[1] https://americanindian.si.edu/nk360/faq/did-you-know
Since HN has a large number of English language learners in the reader-base I figure this spelling is less likely to induce confusion.
Ask HN: How would a US CBDC likely be implemented on a technical level?
Regardless of whether or not you think a US CBDC is a good idea or not, if one is implemented, what will the technical[0] details look like?

[0] I mean from a computer science standpoint more than a financial one, since the latter lends itself to endless macroeconomic debate.
If "follow" would be replaced with "observe", I might observe some peoples activities.

But actually following any of them? No thanks.

Language is important and I think lots of it, like "facebook friends" was not choosen well.
They measure different 3.12 forks, maybe these forks implement different ideas and combined version will be faster.
This is weirdly good news for current owners, in the same way that 9/11 was weirdly good news for surviving a flight.
Yeah. It is embarrassing to learn this when a PCI auditor says, "wait you don't actually still use SSL do you?"
Some percentage of the population is comprised of violent sociopaths. Those people need to be locked up for the safety of the rest of us. People who have committed victimless crimes, like minor drug use, should almost never be incarcerated. People who have defrauded other people in some way, including petty larceny, should be punished by some means other than incarceration.

Pretty much what I'm saying is that jail time should be reserved solely for the violent.
I'd assume the Toyota Production System and their method of lean manufacturing.
Ruben is a machine, I've reported things and he fixed within minutes. Their discord server is top notch, 10/10.
It's accurate in that that's what the government said, and they had a huge majority so could do whatever they wanted

But due to our awful electoral system, they achieved that with only around 40% of the vote
Indeed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ILOVEYOU
For Brexit supporters - was it worth it from an autonomy perspective?

A lot of the arguments I heard were things like, "we don't want Brussels having such a strong say in our <country/government/people/culture/etc>!"

Do you feel the economy is worse but you have better control or options?
And you are more than welcome to design one and submit your proposal to the Council. Note that no one here objects to asking for permission. People resent the intentionally poorly designed version that doesn’t give visitors a meaningful, informed choice. The complaints have targeted either deliberately confusing messages, modals that block access to services that don’t need invasive data processing, or pop-ups that re-appear as soon as you refuse them.

There are compliant and well-designed versions: if a website operator chooses to use a frustrating one, that’s not because the law is wrong; it’s because the operator favors their short-term profit from reselling data over convenience (which is almost always a losing bet).
huh? Twitter has always had chronological timelines. Only thing Musk added in that regard is a buggy even more magic "For You" that's harder to ignore. On my phone at least the app switched to the For You tab every restart and on many of my refreshes.
Need to check the graphics card.

Thinkpad X60 dual core 32bit (dothian?) CPU with Intel i915 graphics runs into problems with Firefox 113 because mesa 23.5 does not support that card. Falls back to llvmpipe (or at least it does on Slackware -current). In theory it should drop to 'Amber' driver (which is mesa 21.something packaged as a fall back) but it does not.

However... a Thinkpad T42 (radeon integrated graphics) which is a single core machine with a PATA mechanical hard drive remains remarkably sprightly. Not up to Firefox 113 though I'm using Seamonkey.

Another thought is the OS. OpenBSD cheerfully admit to limited attention to the i386 arch[1] and do not provide Firefox as a binary package for i386. I find Seamonkey with the legacy ublock origin is feasible on the machines above.

[1] https://www.openbsd.org/i386.html

[2] https://www.mail-archive.com/misc@openbsd.org/msg180687.html No firefox for i386 at least for 7.0
It's against HN's rules to have promotional upvotes and/or comments in the threads. Especially not promotional comments. I suppose your friends were just trying to help you out, but HN users are acutely sensitive to this and consider it spamming. They're not entirely wrong, either, because the upvotes and comments we're talking about were not organic. We want genuine, curious conversation here, and this is not that.

This in both the site guidelines (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) and FAQ (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html).
CI/CD with KiCad and Gitlab
It's private, so we have no way of knowing.
I searched for childrens bedtime stories on Amazon a few months ago. Found some reasonably priced ones that seemed promising. I used the preview feature before I bought.

They were like ... regurgitated ... crap. I couldn't figure out if they just non-native english speakers writing stories, or if it was sort of AI produced work. It was just horrendous.

I figured that they were just spamming junk and if they caught a few people unaware that bought it then it must be profitable for them.
I liked BotW. Weapon durability was annoying, but in practice it means you pin map locations of good weapons that respawn every blood moon updating those pins as you find better weapon spots (this step happens because the weapon is carried by some appropriate strength enemy).
So I don't work in automotive domain, but I work in Controls Engineering. Basically everything you just said relates to my work as well, and based on tidbits of anecdotal info I've picked up through various technical forums it sounds like automotive & controls are quite similar in that regard.

The dirty truth is often times these domains were designed and chiefly operated by non-software people. Not to say a mechanical engineer or electrical engineer can't program, it's just that their focus is on their work, and the software is but a tool to accomplish those means. So the world of software has leapfrogged over PLC and automotive design and gone to run laps around it several times since the 90s. It's only in say the last 5 years or so that I've seen a cultural shift in controls towards embracing the modern realities of software, networking, security, version control, databases, etc.etc.etc.

I'm not going to go too much further into this, but this is why Software Engineering as a regulated profession is going to be a necessity as much as civil engineering or electrical engineering has been. The digital world is just too vast and complex now with so many pitfalls for those who only ride the edges can handle. And people's lives are starting to matter. It is no longer safe to treat security as secondary with an "oopsy" anymore. We don't tolerate bridge collapse or electrical design that can destroy livelihoods, why do we still tolerate hacks governing data and safety of public?
The cars are not exploding. The government has no reason to car about your private property. Should bike manufacturers be sued as well for the rampant bike theft that happens in virtually every city in America? Gimme a break

Affected owners should put together a class action and force a recall on the affected cars. As for those who actually got their cars stolen - they should take that up with the police and their insurance.
I mean, Ford could have also not sold shares(ownership) in his company then they could do what they want.
Human speech production/perception works by articulation changing the shape, hence resonant frequencies (formants), of the vocal tract, and our ear/auditory cortex then picking up these changing formants. We're especially attuned to changes in the formants since those correspond to changes in articulation. The specific resonant frequency values of the formants vary from individual to individual and aren't so important.

Similarly the sound source (aka voice) for human speech can vary a lot from individual to individual, so serves more to communicate age/sex, emotion, identity, etc, not actual speech content (formant changes).

The reason articulatory synthesis (whether based on a physical model of the vocal tract, or a software simulation of one) and formant synthesis sound so similar is because both are designed to emphasize the formants (resonant frequencies) in a somewhat overly-precise way, and neither typically do a good job of accurately modelling the voice source, and other factors that would make it sound more natural. The ultimate form of formant synthesis just uses sine waves (not a source + filter model) to model the changing formant frequencies, and is still quite intelligible.

The "Daisy" song somehow became a staple for computer speech, and can be heard here in the 1984 DECtalk formant-synthesizer version. You can still pick up DECtalks on eBay - an impressive large VCR-sized box with a 3" 68000 processor inside.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daisy_Bell
Yes... that is the point...
And yet you left off:

"The Antifa creep is a human being. Much as I despise what he says and does, much as I’m sure I’d hate him personally if I knew him, I shouldn’t gloat over his suffering. I should be bothered by it. I should remember that somewhere somebody probably loves this kid, and would be crushed if he was killed. If I don’t care about those things, if I reduce people to their politics, how am I better than he is?"
The best one I saw on Red Teaming GPT-4 was Red Teamer Nathan Labenz's youtube https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35377741
They'd obviously hate me too! I've got directories called <name>.html which have an index.html in them which I use to have an equivalent to <name.pdf with all the image files and fonts included in them. But yes it does seem like troublemking to have a .zip directory that doesn't act like a zip file
Appears to have heavy use of `async`, etc. Has anyone gone about creating JNI bindings for an `async` API? I imagine you start the pool in a context object and then access the APIs through that via some callback mechanism? I'd love to read someone's example code if you're willing to share.
Here is my write up: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35922207
Yeah, I'm right up there with you. My uncle died of pancreatic cancer about 15 years ago, and like you said, by the time he knew about it, it was way too late.

I wish there were easier ways to check for it early.
2015 actually!
Doesn't help. You can't verify how a human produced a text. Even a mere paraphrasing treatment could make GPT text impossible to detect.
Or as Jan Werich said "Don't think. If you do think, don't speak out. If you do speak out, don't write it down. If you do write it down, don't sign it. If you do sign it, don't be surprised."
I use a Chromium-derivative browser. I'm not stating the name because what I use is meaningless when it's such a personal decision.
We interestingly ran into issues with actix and the AWS lb. The lb takes some liberty with how it handled connections and actix seems to be "to the spec" so we were seeing a lot of dropped connections. Placing nginx between the two resolved the issue but it's fairly disappointing that we need that layer when it should be unnecessary overhead. I'd love to give axum a try if we could find time and see if it behaves better.
I share your point of view, 100%.

As much as I don't like Musk behaviour lately, or how he try to picture himself as the founder of Tesla, it's really ridiculous to deny his achievements. And the money argument - "oh he just paid good engineers to create the companies" - is pretty dumb too - he wasn't that rich until 2 years ago, so why other billionaires didn't do the same thing ? Or all those other more talented engineers.
If China executes prisoners who would be imprisoned in the US, is it a fair to compare the number of incarcerated in the US and China [1]? In the US they get a lengthy prison sentence, increasing the moving sum of incarcerated for the US, in China they are shot, decreasing the moving sum of the incarcerated for China.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_offences_in_China
Every major Twitter account has the lowest quality replies. Always has been.

It’s just like popular threads on /r/all on Reddit. Good luck finding something that’s not cringey, blowing things out of proportion, or a bad joke.
I downvoted you for this part, fwiw:

> more elderly humans will probably be a net negative
> Europe hasn't been at the forefront of any tech or cultural change for centuries, and seems to be getting along just fine.

"Centuries" is mega hyperbole when you look at physics, chemistry, etc, etc up until at least 1930.
When having conversations in HN does it bother you that you have no way to know if you're talking to a real human, not hiding behind fake usernames? What do you think underlies this feeling you seem to have?

EDIT: what I do think was a tremendous success is the publicity stunt. I've never seen any platform where people felt they should pay to let people know they were who they claimed to be. Kudos to the people doing the whole "twitter is filled with bots" psyop, it worked.
Go ahead and post one of those millions of other things.
But I don't think advertisers GAF about her personal beliefs or philosophy, as long as their ads don't show up next to beheadings or nazis. She is already an advertising executive
> Only problem is that LLMs don’t “learn” from blog posts […] LLMs directly incorporate the learning material into their models

The "in-context learning" (regardless of how you feel about the use of that term) that they do from material incorporated into their prompts does not involve incorporating it into their model.

> The production might be original, depending on its specific circumstances, but the model and the service itself are without any legal doubt derivative works of the original.

Model code is a work, but not derivative of the training data. There’s considerable legal doubt that the models weights themselves are works of authorship at all, which is a prerequisite for being derivative works, so no matter if you are referring to model code or model weights, the statement that model is “without any legal doubt” a derivative work of the training data is false.
Yup. My generalization wasn't about non-technical users. I'm also including my friends (and myself!), some of which who are software engineers, in the category who call animated images gifs.
I don’t know if it’s what is being referred to here, but “provably correct software” is a whole thing. It takes the idea of software tests to the next level, and is very important in some contexts.
I don't think anyone has ever explored an alternative here. Transistors came out of exploratory research that Bell Labs funded and as the other comments say, this indeed happened very recently! I suppose the silicon industry and the digital age built up so fast that we didn't really have the incentive to explore the alternative?
RLHF your AI until you like the output?
> Starship's exhaust is CO2 and water.

And fast moving, directional heat.
Maybe this is naive, but wouldn't the solution be not to sell the cars in Baltimore? It's not that large of a market and there are local car manufacturers there as well. Maybe require in the user agreement not to drive to Baltimore either, similar to the rental car agreements that don't allow for the cars to be driven to Mexico?
An audio file doesnt store musical notes and a digital book does not store ink and paper. Using algorithms either of the two can however reproduce audio and visual content sufficiently similar, albeit not identical.

An llm or generative model doesnt store audio files and digital books, compressed or not. But using algorithms it can reproduce audio and visual content sufficiently similar, but unlike my previous example it’s also made of bites.

Just like an audio file and digital book are not copies of the physical product, an ai “data source” is not an identical or compressed copy of the original bites.

That’s why it can be used to generate output identical to the original data even tho the data it uses is not a verbatim copy.

It’s a new way of storing data, optimised for stochastic generation.

It is a powerful tool but still relies on original content.
is it only me, or wording is kind of weird

> Apple Silicon Macs now natively supports Unreal Engine 5

while technically correct, it sounds to me like this is an achievement of apple silicone like apple managed somehow to now support UE5 and not the other way around

IMO title should be Unreal Engine 5 now natively supports Apple silicone macs
Yesterday I submitted a one-click install to Caprover, never been so easy to self host. It's really fast on Oracle's free 4vCPU, 24GB RAM machine.
Even if you have top notch lawyers, what exactly can they do, when there is a clear rent contract and no payment?
I think I'd find this page much more convincing without the moralism and general anti-Google commentary. I'd be much more persuaded by a direct, simple explanation of the security hole here.

That might because I don't think Google is evil (I'm biased because I used to work there), but I think even if I did, a dispassionate description of the problem would be as or more persuasive.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Message_Block
A similar problem happens with all of their existing continuously trained models, like the ones that power their ad recommendation system.

They do comply with that. They can also comply with this.

I think it all boils down to opportunity costs. Implementing a system that will ensure that the models are fully retrained from raw corpus/logs within the required timeframe simply takes time. Time they don't have since openai and MS are pressing them in that front.

I think some teams at Google will work in the background to ensure that the whole shebang will be GDPR compliant while in parallel google signals to the markets that they are not a dying giant
Don't forget "Your Insurance Will Totes Pay for It" CEOs like the Epi-pen guy.

500 hundred (50,000) may still be low.
Poggio Labs | Senior Fullstack Engineer | Remote in US/Canada | Full-time | $170–200k + equity

At Poggio Labs (https://www.poggiolabs.com/) we’re reimagining customer relationships with a platform that customer obsessed organizations rely on to power intelligence relationships with data.

- We're well-funded and backed by Accel and Spark Capital

- We have an amazing team who previously built products at places like Google, Hubspot, Medium, Trello, and Meta

- We're remote first and we offer a $3500 office & equipment stipend to support that

Read more about the position and apply here - https://grnh.se/041a37ab4us
> Legally it is. If there was no signs of forced entry then you're not going to be compensated for your loss and the police aren't going to pursue any suspects.

This is not correct. The police will take a report, and your insurance (if you have it) will cover your TV even if you left the door wide open. Even if you were drunk. Even if you weren't drunk. There is no clause in standard insurance policies or our laws and statutes that failure to lock shit up somehow makes it free for anyone else to take.
In my experience at least, most of the best content is not produced due to financial incentives. I'd go so far as to say that those financial incentives slowly but surely erode everything they touch, whether it is Youtube influencers chasing ad dollars or Hollywood releasing Avengers: Fast and Furious XVII. I like my large capital projects like Game of Thrones as much as the next guy but they're not at risk from LLMs to begin with and the people who create the best content tend to do it for the love of it hence the starving artist stereotype.

People want to create and whether they do it by putting paper to pen or by curating LLM output until it says or draws what they want it to. I'd rather all this effort spent on worrying about LLMs be spent on promoting the arts and entertainment for its own sake, so it can be funded outside the usual ratrace bullshit.

The hard part is going to be filtering through the content anyway, so why not curate it at the creator level with an extensive arts patronage program!
I agree your example of a salary adjustment is fine, no deceit there.

The deceit comes from pretending to be qualified for a fundamental job requirement that you'll never meet (the requirement to work full time).

A better example is applying for a job that requires a license and after weeks of interviews you finally get an offer just to turn around and say "actually I don't have a license and I'm not willing to get one, but I hope your offer still stands?". Except it's even worse becuase at least in that case the employer can verify your license right off and avoid wasting everyone's time.

Lying on a resume or application is just not a good look.
When was the last time you used any file with .app?

.zip on the other hand is used more frequently across multiple operating systems.
You are confusing paternalism (deciding what others want without asking them) with informed democracy. I’m not saying to decide for American voters. I’m saying that, if you explain GDPR to American citizens, they overwhelmingly think it’s a good idea. I’m not saying they should think so because I know better: I’m saying that they do.

The US is welcome to use any political system they want. The current system is a government of the people, by the corporations, for the executives.
Part of my research involves designing these cancer vaccines. There are different delivery mechanisms, but the need to synthesize medical-grade peptides or mRNA vaccines is one of the major drivers of cost. The sequencing costs are pretty minimal at this point, but analysis of that data by a team of experts is part of that cost as well. This is still largely bespoke stuff that can't quite be standardized because we're still figuring out the best approaches, but there are quite a lot of people working on it!
Good luck with the search. A lot of good jobs come from networking, but you can still find something great out of shooting cold applications, I know several people who did. It takes a ton of work and perseverance but is achievable.