skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The non-serverless version still works fine, even in modern JS land. The simple approach still works if you have some knowledge around setting up a server and configuring a few things.

I also think that the advice around Authentication is often misguided. For simple cases it's not that hard to add authentication without a separate service. There is too much scaring the newbies around that topic, when they are probably about as likely to mess up authentication when they try to configure an excessively complex library compared to implementing basic session authentication with the tools their framework provides.
It is not a choice, (b) is not and has never been what bail was supposed to be about. If your prosecutors were using it that way, it was very much a misuse, at the very least out of sheer laziness (because getting insane bail amounts was easier than actually demonstrating a need for remanding) and most likely racist and / or classist.
This is the most informative yet entertaining rant outside of a Wendover Production I have encountered in a while. You had me at "safe space". Well done!
https://archive.ph/PKZhq
Destroying evidence for what? A crashed plane that did nothing to no one? Don't be naive, this is a crime punishable by revocation a pilots license and a huge fine. That's it.

Boeing deliberately withheld information on what was causing people to get killed. Actual man slaughter.
Congrats on the launch! Will definitely try this when we'll be looking for pentesting
Bail lets you out if can get anyone, relative or a bail bondsman, to vouch for you in a material way. Under other systems, same guys who are prosecuting you decide if they feel like letting you out. In US, you can still be released on your own recognizance if the system believes you are not a flight risk. But even for substantial crimes like robbery, where there are reasons to believe you a flight risk, you still can be let out if someone trusts you enough to lend bail money.
Extending battery life via xfce4-cpufreq-plugin
Merge request:
https://gitlab.xfce.org/panel-plugins/xfce4-cpufreq-plugin/-...
“Recent” as in the 80s or 90s, sure. Threads are older than unix was when threads were introduced.
> The biggest pirate downside is that it nearly necessitates a desktop with significantly better equipment

For me personally, the biggest downside is that I don’t feel good about myself when I take things I know I don’t have the right to take. YMMV.
I think the comment you replied to was being facetious
`tar czf` is a lot easier to remember than `tar -I zstd cf`
flawed or not, the onus is not on Kia. ultimately baltimore is suing them because of the spike in car thefts, not because of the flawed design. presumably if baltimore had no thieves, there would be no thefts irrespective of the design.

so in effect baltimore is suing kia becuase their cars are getting stolen which is ridiculous.

i don't know how anyone can defend this.

this would be like baltimore suing banks for allowing customers to put in the pin "1234" after seeing a spike in money theft through ATMs.

if Baltimore wants the cars to be harder to steal, then they should work with the governor to pass a law that requires cars sold in Maryland to have whatever security functionality they deem necessary.
Can you give a source for why you think that?
See https://abcnews.go.com/2020/marcus-schrenker-fake-death/stor...
I don't understand what you're arguing for. You want the EU to throw ethics out the window to encourage business growth?
Note that all Switch games have to be small, out of technical necessity. The Switch only comes with 32 GB of internal storage, and that also gets used for your game saves, your screenshots/videos, and the OS itself. If Nintendo wants to offer digital downloads, and if it doesn't want to require users to go out and buy an SD card to expand their storage (which, to be clear, you should anyway for convenience), then they have to keep game sizes small.
Real Clear Politics is a project of The Federalist, funded by Donor's Trust and Richard Uihlein. Do not believe everything they publish.
Great question! We have a built-in integration test for 1 million images [1] and have benchmarked EVA on large unstructured datasets for our ACM SIGMOD paper [2].

Coming up with an open benchmark for AI-Relational database systems is essential [3]. Please share your thoughts on any ideas for benchmarking :)

[1] https://github.com/georgia-tech-db/eva/blob/e123820c79b902d5...

[2] https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3514221.3526142

[3] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3299869.3324955
Eventually though it leads to a situation where no one has any trust left in government, which is extremely dangerous from a democracy perspective - it breeds resentment, splintering/secession and people taking the law into their own hands (or to put it bluntly, shooting at everything they deem a threat - including children playing hide-and-seek [1]).

That's also the reason why there are so many doomsday preppers in the USA vs. everywhere else on the planet that isn't an active warzone. These people simply don't trust the government to keep them alive in a time of crisis.

[1] https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/05/09/louisia...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35915958
The problem is that we really want companies (especially, in the U.S., U.S. companies) to build planes. So we need a regulatory regime that appropriately governs their behavior but also does not result in such draconian penalties for negligence that they decide it would be safer to invest in some other business.

Not to say we've struck exactly the right balance, necessarily. But there's just no logic in making a direct comparison between a company that made an error in designing am aircraft and an individual who flew a plane into the ground on purpose.
> There literally are no trade-offs; it is better in every objective way.

There literally are trade-offs, you started your comment describing one of them. If you want as wide out-of-the-box support as possible, you'd go with gzip.

The Compression Streams browser API only supports gzip (+ deflate) so if you wanna compress something natively in the browser without 3rd party libraries (or slow JS implementation), gzip seems to be the only option.
And if LPL can pick up the belt lock then it's fair game.

Sounds stupid, like the way to blame hyundai or kia for existence of scum people like thieves.
The real problem is that mortgages aren't as good as cash when buying a house. If someone needs to sell quick or if there are issues with the house they have to rely on these discount buyers. The protections that slow down the mortgage process have their use but it's one of those situations where the cure is worse than the disease.
If you consider a decade a few years, sure.
N64 also had the advantage to not suffer from the "wobbling walls" effect of the PS1, at least to me
Very fun, just a bit slow right now. My solution was far from optimal, but I eventually connected them with:

investor > banker > robber > accomplice > patsy > mark
It’s an unacceptable amount of time for a phone. Devkit is one thing, but if you’re buying a phone you should expect more than few hours of usage.
It's entirely within Google's rights to decide they don't want to be a worldwide corporation anymore if they find it's unprofitable to continue being one!

The law says "if you want to operate in the EU, you must do X." Google looked at that equation and said they didn't want to do X, so they didn't roll out Bard in the EU. That's in full compliance with the law, no different than PornHub blocking Utah. If you don't like it, talk to your representatives.

I think what people in this thread are really frustrated with is that for a long time the US has been imposing its laws on other countries quite successfully. International corporations have generally found it worthwhile to comply with US law in order to operate there, and people were hoping that the same would be true of the EU. When it turns out that for some companies it hasn't been, it seems unfair.
Most people I know would bracket you as right-leaning if you attack a left-wing position without balancing it by simultaneously attacking a right-wing position. It is usually acceptable to attack right-wing issues without a balancing act.

I find it quite troubling, but that's where we are. I don't care about my reputation.
> Its a fundamentally flawed design, and it never should have made it past review.

It is a flawed design, but there’s just one problem for a lawsuit: Immobilizers are not legally required in the US. A flawed immobilizer is fine, considering there doesn’t even need to be an immobilizer.

Baltimore is suing because, yes, they are easy to steal and that makes things inconvenient for Baltimore. But no law was broken - there is no law requiring cars to be hard to steal. Thus they are trying to claim “public nuisance” instead of “negligence.”

This, in my mind, is a super slippery slope. You know parts pairing on iPhones, where you can’t swap the camera without Apple’s approval? One day there could be a carmaker or two that pairs everything from mirrors to catalytic converter to “prevent theft and fraud.” If Baltimore wins, anyone who doesn’t do that could be found liable. Just an extreme example of how this could go sideways fast.

Or let’s say two or three bike manufacturers start putting GPS systems into their bikes, to prevent theft. Can any bike manufacturer that doesn’t do that be sued in the future? I would argue, they should absolutely not be in absence of a law.
I doubt there's much, if any profit margin on the consoles themselves. I think it's pretty typical for consoles of all brands to be sold at a loss in order to capture customers for their ecosystem where they will buy games and other media which have very healthy margins.

Nintendo's biggest concern is probably controlling the experience. While it might not be a marvel of gaming technology on the Switch, it is consistent. Allowing it to run on any old computer hardware means a lot of it will be poorly optimized as a rule. non-technical people will likely have no idea what that means; to them it will just be a shitty gaming experience and they will then associate that experience with Nintendo. Technical people will probably not even bother and they'll just emulate it for free instead of paying $70 for a game that isn't going to have any official support on their platform. There's really no upside for Nintendo in this plan.
Nah, not a threat. AI is just a tool. It will help inexperienced folks realize their imaginations faster, and help experienced professionals work quicker.

However, a computer doesn't replace human imagination, which is what truly powers art in all forms. A computer will just do what you tell it to do.
My feelings about Decentraland are mixed.

As boring as it is, I think the browser-based technology is pretty good. In particular it is easy for anyone to join in without special hardware, downloading software, or registering on a platform.

I'd like to see technology with similar technology that is not affiliated with a "world", that is if I want to share a scene with people I'd like to run my own instance and don't see a lot of value in "land", sharing a wider world with other experiences, etc.
Found a list of models that are blacklisted from being added to insurance policies [1]:

2015-2021 Hyundai Accent (all body styles)
2015-2021 Hyundai Elantra (two-door and four-door)
2015-2021 Hyundai Kona
2015-2021 Hyundai Santa Fe
2015-2021 Hyundai Tucson
2015-2018 Hyundai Veloster
2015-2021 Kia Forte
2015-2021 Kia Optima
2015-2016 Kia Optima Hybrid
2015-2021 Kia Rio (all body styles)
2015-2021 Kia Sedona
2015-2016 Kia Sorento
2015-2021 Kia Soul
2015-2021 Kia Sportage

edit: forbes [2] offers a slightly different list of models:

> Hyundai is offering a free software update to prevent thefts on certain targeted vehicles, starting Tuesday on nearly 4 million Hyundais on the road. The first million eligible cars are 2017 to 2020 Elantra, 2015 to 2019 Sonata and 2020 to 2021 Venue vehicles. Affected owners can bring in the car to Hyundai dealerships for the free anti-theft upgrade. It takes about an hour to install. Once updated a window decal will (hopefully) alert and deter thieves from targeting the vehicle.

> The next batch of eligible vehicles will go in for the software update in June and includes a long list of Kia models, including:

2018-2022 Accent
2011-2016 Elantra
2021-2022 Elantra
2018-2020 Elantra GT
2011-2014 Genesis Coupe
2018-2022 Kona
2020-2021 Palisade
2013-2018 Santa Fe Sport
2013-2022 Santa Fe
2019 Santa Fe XL
2011-2014 Sonata
2011-2022 Tucson
2012-2017, 2019-2021 Veloster

[1] https://www.thedrive.com/news/these-hyundai-and-kia-models-a...

[2] https://www.forbes.com/wheels/news/kia-hyundai-car-thefts-se...
There is no relationship. I can take apart my front door including the lock without a problem, and it is still secure. Security is a property of the locked state, repairability a property of the unlocked state.
It's still number 2, we're talking about a consumer market, not a market.
For some reason, bzip compresses text incredibly well. And it has for years, I remember noticing this almost 20 years ago.
The city should run a public campaign to publicly advertise the consequences of stealing a vehicle (e.g./ jail, heavy fines, reduced job prospects, etc.). Make it clear criminals will be punished hard for stealing cars. Maybe they can ask the manufacturers and dealers to sponsor or donate to it.
This is superb, very Black Mirror-esque.
> I'm also not a huge fan of open world games in general and to this date

In theory they sound great. In reality it seems to work against every open-world game I've played. Elden Ring is almost an exception, but the side quests are completely broken in this format without following a guide.

I hated the Witcher 3. Much like RDR 2 it has great presentation, writing and VA - and everything else suffers. But it seems the new generation of gamers have spoken, and they like glorified interactive television with a low bar for gameplay.
Is it illegal to visit that half of the city?
Again, the EU making things more difficult for EU startups. As if GDPR wasn't enough.
> "I lost my patience and told her off: there are many children who are hungry, and you bring me a dog?" he added, triggering a round of applause from the crowd.

There are hungry children out there, therefore you shouldn't have a dog but more hungry children? Makes sense.
I don't think it's user hostile to give users the option to do this. Also, realistically, you're more likely to have your headphones lost/stolen than your apple account and for most(?) apple users, I imagine being locked out of their apple account would be worse than losing access to their headphones considering they would also lose their files, photos, messages, subscriptions etc.
Agree, this was one of the most captivating pieces I've read in recent memory.
They are part of the law, sure, but they are not legally binding in the same way as articles are. If there is ambiguity in a law, as there often is, a judge may use these for interpreting the overall "spirit of the law". But even then, articles always take precedence and these cannot be overruled by recitals.
Hopefully I can save other founders from trying to monetize communities.
> This is visceral to him.

It may also just be that, as his LinkedIn shows him now working for a fancy law firm in Wisconsin, the amount of money dangled in front of him was "visceral" and this letter is just an easy cheap shot when he's already out the door.
You are touting the language's ecosystem or tooling but the language itself is horrid. PHP is carried by Laravel.

Another language carried by tooling is Go. The language itself doesn't even have sum types, lmao.
Perhaps it is if you want to get lost in the philosophical implications. Practically, you would perceive exactly as you did while alive.
Can you be "you" without your body?
How much would they cost aprox per training?

What would the quality of the model be, compared to what Karpathy uses on his video “let’s build gpt from scratch”?

In that video, he builds a decoder-only transformer model, that learns Shakespeare from 1MB of data and trains in 15min
3 kids you say?

Boomerang Fu. You are welcome.

It's a silly, simple, utterly un-put-downable game in our house.
Literally nobody thinks that. This whole thread is evidence that this is well known disparity, and one which many people feel strongly about but are unable to correct. I’d argue it’s not correctable: we can’t as a society with lots of crime devote as much money to thwarting prosecutions as we do on apprehension, detention, prosecution etc… The focus should be on crime prevention which can include better education, less restrictive laws, improved policing and crime research.
I have this happen with every Apple device I own, except AirTags. I’ll have a laptop, AirPods, and an iPad in my backpack. Every time I leave a location, one of them goes “missing”.

And trying to convince my AirTag to not go bonkers every time I leave a hotel room is a losing battle.
My apologies, I misunderstood "It's more explicit than MySQL" to imply that you were saying that approach couldn't be used in MySQL.
There is nothing similar between this guy and Boeing. Boeing hid development issues and cheated (oversimplified) with certification. They tried to blame other parties, pilots and airlines, for those life losses. That is despicable. But they did not intentionally crash a plane, and try to hide it. They did not intentionally build an unsafe aircraft with the goal of killing people.

That guy planned a plane crash for social media likes, and tried to cover it up. Actively.

Those two cases are nothing a like, not even remotely.
Mechanical engineers operate under the same assumption, though it's generally a stupidity standard vs a maliciousness standard. In this case, they absolutely should have recognized there was no backup to their (much more affordable) immobilizer design, and caught it in the early design review phases.
It is undecided/unclear what is legal or not, I am not an american so I am not the one that should explain this.

But Microsoft trained their coding AI with GPL software but not with proprietary software impaling that they can risc screwing Open Source but not the paying GitHub customers or not sure why they did not used their own internal proprietary code.

Open AI trained with the entire inernet, books, ignored any license copyright cponcerns.
Stability.ai also trained with lot of stuff.
Adobe trained only with stuff they have licenses.

So as we can see until an USA judge decides how to interpret the existing laws then stuff are not sure, some companies take the risks other take less risks, others no risk.

But if USA some other judge in a superior court my decide something else, so IMO USA also needs to take a decision and not let FUD (deserved or not) about AI to spread.

I seen many do not know that the issue ChatGPT had in Italy was about a data leak. There are laws on what you do when this happens, probably are similar laws in USA , maybe in USA is harder to start a investigation or maybe there were some lobbying involved.
You can DFU any old iPhone and erase install any appropriately signed version of iOS on it.

What you can’t do is finish activation without a network connection and the last signed in AppleID account password.

Are you saying you don’t have the password for the last signed in AppleID?
Cool, so they're increasing paddings a bit while apparently still not making the layout make more sense.
For the Portuguese market you can try Pplware [1]

[1] https://pplware.sapo.pt/
No thats just Hollywood. In general a crashed car or small plane crumbles on impact. It doesn't explode in a ball of fire. A forest fire is very unlikely here.

When you point your car at a wall and drive into that wall you ALSO cannot argue for 0 max danger of death for an innocent bystander.

But the probability of a person dying is so low we know there is no danger for murder or death at all. It's just really stupid.

Of course there needs to be consequences. A loss of pilots license and a huge ass fine. Jail time is crazy. You know how jail will ruin a person's entire life right? Even a month of jail time is in certain ways hangs on your record like a life sentence. It's too much.
LLMTune: 4-Bit Finetuning of LLMs on a Consumer GPI
The only way to avoid falling under the provisions of the act is to not have any customers in the EU -- that's quite a big market to cut yourself out of, and definitely something a big company cannot afford to do.
Even though the opposite is recited more frequently, in some cases good can be the enemy of perfect
This is the "I paid for college so why should education be free" argument.
Feel free to demand an additional discount when buying a Kia/Hyundai in Baltimore.
So there should only be one model of employee compensation? In this case a time based model?

Also aren’t gig workers free to do whatever they like while they are waiting for work?
I think GP is talking about the case where you have more than one client and don’t want to throw all the server’s threads at serving just one.
no it is not. the fact that you can take apart your front door makes it inherently easier to get into your house vs. a door that could not be disassembled.
I think how negation is a major problem in classical logic and how it affected symbolic A.I. There are numerous ways of representing negation in logic, but all of them, like the three ways of representing OO hierarchies in SQL, do some things well and fall down completely in others.
The issue is that the people in power are not progressives, or have not gotten full support and the time needed to enact change. Establishment Democrats are just as pro-punishment as Republicans; take the President’s history as a legislator. NYC is literally run by a cop. Trolls started blaming the progressive mayor of Chicago for crime before he even took office. LAPD contains a literal gang. The system progressives want to change is too deeply rooted to change in just an election.

I don’t know if progressive policies are the answer to everything, but we’ve steadily been throwing money in the other direction so consider whether that strategy is a failure.
Switching to a new browser seems like far more effort than installing uBlock Origin, and has much further-reaching security/trust ramifications, but to each their own. :)
Industry standard means used widely across the industry, I would like to note that Hyundai and Kia are the largest Korean automotive makers. In the NA market, Hyundai is positioned #5 with 10% market share. In Korea, Kia and Hyundai combined have ~79% of the market. So to frame it as "they are not using industry standard" is wrong as at least 10% of the NA market and ~80% of the Korean market does not use this technology.

So in the past, the most stolen make of car was the Honda Accord.

Apparently Honda should have taken note and aggressively pushed new anti-theft technology.

You are looking for a technological solution to a societal problem.
There is also Snowstar in Andalusia, if Dubuque is too far.
You can't forbid others from learning from your work. If you want to prevent it then don't post it publicly.
> It is not pronounced like the plural of pig.

I've got news for you buddy :)
> Generally it's out of pocket maximum to a point, like $250k. Then it's normally split, something like 80-20, where you have to cover 20% of the bill.

Not since the Affordable Care Act of 2010. It got rid of benefit maximums and implemented out of pocket maximum. An out of pocket maximum up to a limit is a contradiction. The situation works exactly opposite, you first pay 100% up to deductible, then you pay a proportion according to your copay, then you pay 0% after the out of pocket maximum.

Annual out of pocket maximums are typically $5k to $10k for individual/family at any half decent employer.

Legally, the maximums are $9.1k/$18.2k.

https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/out-of-pocket-maximum-li...