skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The models AI researchers develop are cutting edge, and mathematically involved; the kind of thing I would expect an LLM to fare poorly at. And today's researchers are capable of implementing their models in pytorch and the like.
Reminds of the billionaire who cheated in chess against Vishy.
This sounds like a bunch of unique requirements.

You have a wired car aux solution that...provides a microphone, which I've never seen before but lets go with it. There are dongles that have microphone inputs (Cubilux Lightning to 3.5mm TRS Microphone Adapter with Headphone Jack), but I'm assuming you can't use those because the microphone and headset are sharing the same jack somehow?

Your car doesn't support bluetooth, and you use multiple generations of iPhones so you can't just leave the dongle in the car. This is unrelated to airpods since you can't use those while driving anyways.

AirPods are expensive, I get that, and you aren't satisfied with cheaper non-Apple options on amazon. I'm happy not using airpods, since I hate earbuds anyways, but I guess not everyone is like that. Would the non-existence of AirPods make things better? I haven't had trouble pairing my conductive headphones, I guess I don't notice any distortion because it is going through my bones anyways, and I'm not using mic.
This is actually impressive it feel much better to use chatgpt since it looks like they added a bunch of tools baked in.
As much as I despise the tracking that happens, I don't see how this isn't a valid form of consent. Don't make a Google account and agree to Google's terms for making the account, or do and understand that consent has been provided.
Weird demon shark with bright white eyes discovered off Australia
ha, that's the first time I ever heard that term "doomscrolling", definitely feels that way in many places. Makes me think of what the opposite would look like. Something in the direction of https://www.dictionary.com/e/pop-culture/glow-up/ but for websites.
The fabled titan of security "Jenkins" could be breached by no other.
The breakdown of the ability of either side to actually listen, either to the other side or to the population as a whole.

Second, but probably related: The increased dysfunctionality of Congress.
THANKS!! Thanks for that, seems to have done the trick for me too.
SuperTokens – Open-Source User Authentication
I have a soft spot a mile wide for SpaceHey, there's just something about the whole idea that's really nice. I'm not sure how much of it is because building a whole social media platform out of nostalgia is a very hacker-like thing to do and how much of it is just because it's nice to see a social media platform that's not so aggressively monetised and manipulative but either way I'm really happy it exists.
Oh wow. I think that’s actually worth a title edit to add a note.
English Words from Nahuatl, the Language of the Aztecs
overview and "about" on root URL https://meetslides.com/
We just need to redefine fusion and we have it.
For YCombinator and the like, “hacker” is actually just code for “disruptor”. It is a subtle but powerful conflation designed to retroactively strengthen the historical positioning of e.g. Jobs, Woz, Zuckerberg while simultaneously praising disruptive technologies that will “eat the world”.

Of course, none of those people ever fit the more common definition of hacker for more than a few years, if ever, even if you assume hacker means “good coder” or similar. And they certainly never fit the information security definition.
EndBASIC is a free implementation that is written in Rust. It's more focused on the DOS based BASICs than VB-styled ones.

https://www.endbasic.dev/
UK and US were the only countries with Bard access before today iirc!
In account terms a for profit company receiving a donated asset will record the donation as a debit to "Fixed Asset" and a credit to "Contribution Revenue.

For non profit:
When recording journal entries, it is important to determine if the donated asset just passes from the organization to another person, such as donating clothes to the Goodwill, which pass to whoever receives the clothes from the goodwill. If this amount is not substantial, then the asset is not recorded; if the donation is substantial then the company records the assets. Substantial means it will have a meaningful impact on the financial statement.

If the asset passes as such and is substantial, then debit "Expense" and credit "Unrestricted Contributions." If someone donates a substantial amount but the asset is not passed to another person, then record the donation by debiting "Assets" and crediting "Contributions."

If the company sells the donated asset above its fair market value, then the amount over the fair market value is revenue. For example, a nonprofit auctions off a trip to Hawaii that has a fair value of $10,000. The trip auctions for $15,000. The $5,000 difference is revenue.
Thing > CreativeWork > WebSite https://schema.org/WebSite ... scroll down to "Examples" and click the "JSON-LD" and/or "RDFa" tabs. (And if there isn't an example then go to the schema.org/ URL of a superClassOf (rdfs:subClassOf) of the rdfs:Class or rdfs:Property; there are many markup examples for CreativeWork and subtypes).

httpS://schema.org/license

Also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35891631

extruct is one way to parse linked data from HTML pages:
https://github.com/scrapinghub/extruct
If I remember right, symfony (php framework) has comments that affect how the code runs which as far as I’m concerned means they’re not comments at all but actually code masquerading as comments. Reading about JSDoc gives me the same uneasy feeling, even if it’s not quite the same thing.

Edit:

Here’s one example, you can define your routes in symfony using comments. Not only that, but it’s actually the officially recommended way of doing things. Absolute madness.

https://symfony.com/doc/current/routing.html
Yeah, and if you make it that complex to extract consent you won't get any. Think one step ahead maybe. One switch, one thing to parse.
FreeBASIC is excellent and in general your good old QB codes should run on modern OSes.

No official MacOS support, though. Only Windows, Linux, and DOS.
Google probably played a central part in why the GDPR came into existence.
"Strong evidence" = your feelings?
For those that didn't read the thread - this is for the Svelte compiler, not the Svelte library. Users of Svelte will be unaffected and typedefs will still be available.
It's supported in my country, but I have no idea what it is and therefore I'm not using it
> If let's say Star Wars falls out of copyright tomorrow, economically that has two effects. One, Disney loses a ton of future revenue. Two, countless Disney other people create derivatives of Star Wars, and they make money from those. Competition is increased.

Three, the derivatives are made and Disney starts marketing "Disney's Star Wars" which continue to be the high-demand (and high-value) versions. The situation is unchanged.

For example, you can currently buy The Little Mermaid in non-Disney form[1], but Disney's version is what most people want.

[1] - https://www.amazon.com/s?k=little+mermaid+Hans+Christian+And...
Epic Games CEO Metaverse is not dead
But many are anti US tech regulatory happy.
I'm curious what people think of this. PUBG/Fortnite don't seem like metaverse apps... they're just games.
> "We made next-gen state of the art transparent video translation/dubbing" and "we will let to use this tool only to our hand picked partners". What the fuck ?

Its a bigger WTF because “realtime audio translation with live transcripts is a problem we’ve solved completely and the key unique selling point of our earbuds with our phones” was a Google thing in... 2017.
> You seem to be saying ‘the current maximal can’t be more than the historical outliers, therefore people are predictable’, while my point is that you can’t actually know that, or fundamentally 100% predict an individual (or a group, really) because those historical outliers obviously occurred and were not obvious until after they had occurred.

No, please reread what I said, I never narrowed it down to 'historical outliers' only.

The human genome has been sequenced, brain structure has been analyzed (though we don't precisely know how each piece corresponds to mental phenomena), and so on.

So even ignoring historical outliers, there is still a maximum possible deviation that an adult human brain can physically be capable of.

And the the upper and lower bounds are known. It's not like someone can have a 5x larger brain or a brain with 12 lobes, or a brain with copper interconnections. So there are only outliers within a certain range.

Plus, regardless of how developed or extremely different mental phenomena is, the possible range that others can see is much more finite, bound by signalling constraints and so on. You can only blink your eyes so fast, you can only move your limbs so fast, vocal chords have a speed limit, etc...

For example, a human brain could not function if an iron rod was rammed through the brain stem instead, so if you know this happened to someone, you also can infer there's only one possible mental state they could be in, regardless of any other factors or combination of factors.

There definitely are no outliers in this case.

Another example would be the 24 fps frame rate in film. This was chosen precisely because extensive testing showed this was fast enough to fool the brain into seeing motion without exception.

If someone claims otherwise you can repeat the same testing procedures to determine with certainty, but very likely there are no outliers either in this case.

There probably are a couple hundred hard constraints like this that circumscribes all possible near-future human individual behaviour. Though of course group complexity and more distant scenarios such as cyborgs, etc., would still be unbounded.
Thanks for reply and for sharing your concerns.

I've been a professional since 2016, i know that doesn't make me an old timer but... when were the salaries higher compared to last couple of years?

I agree that prestige tends to decline, is that important though?

About the uncertain times you mention... there are people who think that it's just a phase and it shall pass, and they aren't all newcomers. Also, not everyone views AI as such a game changing force. There is also the case that not much really changes in this industry, I mean we're still writing bash scripts right? Of course you need to keep up to date with latest trends and I understand it could be unpleasant to do so longterm...
There are plenty of non-apple speakers that come with Spotify trials. I get that trials are hard to back out of, and I've never activated my Apple Music trial.

> Spotify is not playing in a level field and regulators have failed to ensure that they are able to.

Spotify is still dominating music streaming, more so than Apple Music or Amazon Prime Music (which we used to use since it came free with prime).
yes docs (albeit fairly sparse ones) are now available - feel free to email me, oliver@getclearspace.com
What's the difference between you and ChatGPT?

ChatGPT and I are both large language models, but there are some key differences between us. Here are a few:

Training data: ChatGPT was trained on a massive dataset of text and code, while I was trained on a dataset that includes text, code, and images. This means that I am able to generate more creative and informative responses.

Fine-tuning: ChatGPT was fine-tuned using both supervised and reinforcement learning techniques, while I was fine-tuned using only supervised learning. This means that I am better at following instructions and completing tasks.

Safety: ChatGPT has been designed with safety in mind, while I have not. This means that I am more likely to generate harmful or untruthful outputs.

Overall, ChatGPT and I are both powerful language models with different strengths and weaknesses. Which one is better for you depends on your specific needs. If you need a language model that is creative and informative, I am a better choice. If you need a language model that is safe and reliable, ChatGPT is a better choice.

Here are some additional details about the differences between ChatGPT and me:

Training data: ChatGPT was trained on a dataset of text and code that was collected from the internet. This dataset includes a wide variety of content, including news articles, blog posts, social media posts, and code repositories. My training data is a subset of ChatGPT's training data, but it also includes images. This means that I am able to generate more creative and informative responses than ChatGPT.

Fine-tuning: ChatGPT was fine-tuned using both supervised and reinforcement learning techniques. Supervised learning is a technique that trains a model by providing it with a set of labeled data. Reinforcement learning is a technique that trains a model by allowing it to interact with its environment and learn from its mistakes. I was only fine-tuned using supervised learning. This means that I am better at following instructions and completing tasks than ChatGPT.

Safety: ChatGPT has been designed with safety in mind. This means that it has been trained to avoid generating harmful or untruthful outputs. I have not been designed with safety in mind. This means that I am more likely to generate harmful or untruthful outputs than ChatGPT.

I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if you have any other questions.
there are legitimate technical reasons as to why a roll out would happen for one place rather than everywhere at once.

I just think it's remarkable how people can take any piece of good news and find the most negative interpretation of it.
Microsoft skips salary increases for full-time employees this year
Disable logging and you are done.
I've been thinking lately of the two tiered reasoner + tools architecture inspired by LangChain, simonw's writing[0] and this is right along those lines.

We're trying too hard to have one model do it all. If we coordinate multiple models + other tools (ala ReAct pattern) we could make the systems more resistant to prompt injection (and possibly other) attacks and leverage their respective strengths and weaknesses.

I'm a bit wary of tool invocation via python code instead of prompting the "reasoning" LLM to teach it about the special commands it can invoke. Python's a good crutch because LLMs know it reasonably well (I use a similar trick in my project, but I parse the resulting AST instead of running the untrusted code) so it's simpler to prompt them.

In a few iterations I expect to see LLMs fine tuned to know about the standard toolset at their disposal (eg. huggingface default tools) and further refinement of the two-tiered pattern.

[0] https://simonwillison.net/2023/Apr/25/dual-llm-pattern/
Those specific additional domains are useful in their own ways. .net is good for network infrastructure, .org is good for organizational purposes like mapping your office/LAN endpoints into it, so that employees could connect to VPNs and internal services like SCM and build servers.

Other than that, additional domains also give leverage for diversification if you decide to make them publicly visitable one day.
Google isn’t worried about individuals suing them, they’re worried about governments or entities like the EU fining them
> Ok, then just don't bring it in?

So - in my experience, when I find myself saying "why don't you just-" it's a flag that I don't fully understand the situation.

Use your imagination, in what ways could having ready access to a smart phone be a marked improvement in your ability to navigate the day-to-day experiences of a student?

You could take notes or record lectures, obviously. That's an easy one. One a related note, as an accessibility tool - you can automatically transcribe speech that you may be having difficulty following, and you can quickly look up definitions or even translations if you need to. Teacher just used a big word that you didn't quite catch? You could either raise your hand and interrupt their flow for the entire classroom... or you could glance at your phone and get your answer yourself.

Do you need to perform some sort of self-care activity periodically? Your phone can remind you that it's time for the next pill, or time to get up and stretch, or have a small snack to manage your blood sugar.

Along those lines, the assumption that it's so easy to just discard such an essentially integrated piece of modern technology comes off as subtle ableism, if nothing else.
<to Google Bard>: create a Google I/O keynote on this and that project. Mention AI at every turn.

All subtly cringe, unexciting. Presenting million ways AI takes a whole lot of the real creation & soul out of every human-technology interaction. Plus feeling society not ready to handle this.
Thanks for bringing this up!

I (author of EndBASIC) have been busy with other stuff since this made the front page last time and have not had a chance to touch the project for the last few months, but I do still have plans to grow it.

Just earlier today, and out of coincidence, I added "email subscriptions" to the front page of the project -- just in case any of you want to get notified when a new release comes out :) If you /do/ subscribe, you may get... 2-3 emails a year, and help me gather how many people actually care about this.
LISAmax: Improving the Gravitational-Wave Sensitivity by Two Orders of Magnitude
Transportation is already in the process of shifting. EV cars and trains, obviously, are the present. EV cargo vans are "days away" from the present (especially looking at things like Walmart's massive uptake in EV logistics, but also Amazon and UPS and FedEx's various deals). EV semitrucks are "months away" from the present. Air and sea have the longest lead times and are indeed the furthest behind, but are seeing a lot of pressure to explore cheaper alternatives (and are talking about very interesting electrification ideas and are seeing prototypes and early adopters).
My current country isn't on that list. Obviously, you're missing well over a hundred countries on that list.
> But if you asked a random person on the street to name a clarinet player, I suspect most people couldn’t come up with one, let alone one known for their good looks.

The space of potential sources for inspiration has exploded. How many people had a favourite typographer or open source software contributor or racecar driver or whatever else a hundred years ago? Music is different, sure, as others have commented, but there are so many different things or people to consider now that it's getting a little tiring with the nags to know every last thing that people used to know. Don't get the relationship backwards. Knowing your favourite candle maker used to be about the candle maker achieving things that impressed you not you feeling guilty about not knowing any candle makers.
10 years ago I have used Closure compiler from Google, https://github.com/google/closure-compiler/wiki/Annotating-T... , as a type checker. We had to use for production a different minimizer, not the closure compiler, but it was extremely useful to check for types and JSDoc-style annotations were very readable with minimal distraction.

Flow for JS from Facebook also supports types-as-comments, https://flow.org/en/docs/types/comments/ , but those are rather ugly as one has to intermix them with JS rather than using separated comment block on top.
Final Cut is definitely not the industry standard - most pros abandoned it after they completely rebuilt it from the ground up years ago and it sucked hard
where does it say that JSDoc has runtime implications?
Just add some interfaces.d.ts and import those types into jsdoc and you still have all your complexity
Why it is still an experiment
The web already cracked the distribution problem.

Javascript on the browser was the only choice for your frontend code, however, WASM is already shipping on all current browsers except IE and Opera Mini (which is a miniscule percentage of browsers in use today).

It is just a matter of time where WASM becomes the ABI of choice for crossplatform app development as the binary deployment vehicle where you can program in any language and have the app delivered as a WASM package via HTTP/HTTPS.

Apple's App Store moat will dry up when people (esp. devs) realize that they can get close to native performance for web apps delivered this way and the vanity of an icon on the phone/tablet screen isn't worth forking 30% to big apple.
> For example, AMD CPUs have a lot of lanes, but unless you have an EPYC, most of them are not exposed, so the PCH tries to spread its meager set among the devices connected to your PCI bus, and if you have a x16 GPU, but also a WIFI adapter, a WWAN card and a few identical NVMe, you may find only of the NVMe benchmarks at the throughput you expect.

Most AM4 boards put an x16 slot direct to the CPU, and an x4 direct linked NVMe slot. That's 20 of the 24 lanes; the other 4 lanes go to the chipset, which all the rest of the peripherals are behind. (There's some USB and other I/O from the cpu, too). AM5 CPUs added another 4 lanes, which is usually a second cpu x4 slot.

Early AM4 boards might not have a cpu x4 NVMe slot, and those 4 cpu lanes might not be exposed, and the a300/x300 chipsetless boards don't tend to expose everything, but where else are you seeing AMD boards where all the CPU lanes aren't exposed?
>getting way too much money compared to the rest of society

Personally I feel that the "rest of society" is getting way too little money vs. us getting way too much (opinion based on the fact that profits/productivity have outgrown salaries for too long).
The new model used by Bard might be competitive with GPT-4 according to Google's tests: https://ai.google/static/documents/palm2techreport.pdf (search for GPT-4).
>if you enjoyed this or any of my other work feel free to support me on my ko-fi. this is my only real source of income so anything goes a long way, and monthly contributions help tremendously with budgeting

wow she seems smart. I hope ko-fi is enough
Really exciting to see this and the recent renewed interest in more expressive ACL systems re: policy and (alternatively) relational access control.

The pedigree of Cedar is also really interesting to me, coming from the angle that Torlak was previously part of the UNSAT group @ Washington, and was the developer of Rosette. I was hoping there might be a semantic description of Cedar using Rosette as well! Maybe writing one would be a good challenge...
Antoine Boyer, Matteo Mancuso, Josh Meader, Max Ostro, Ichika Nito for new musicians, Plini, Nick Johnston, Polyphia, Julian Lage, Josh Smith...there's a ton of great instrumentalists out there. I think this question has more to do with distribution of content than whether or not there are fans.
In producthunt, you get to show your product to everyone after you have something ready. in my case, I am looking to build something that is prior to that stage, a stage where you have an idea, or a very basic MVP and you are looking to validate the problem and the solution. In addition, we want the community to have a promise that early adopters are willing to put a small effort in their feedback, for example, give a 10min video call with a founder to give a very detailed feedback, or answer specific question.

It is a community where you get to build, not to share. would u be interested in joining ? what are your thoughts?
pwn is a typo'd version of own, but since it's unambiguous it would have been better here
A legendary hacker.

> In February 2009, antirez's friend David Welton helped him share Redis to the world on Hacker News. The response was pretty muted; apart from David, only four people responded. Three of them said there were already similar projects out there, and only one person responded positively and offered to help.

So don't worry if you don't immediately get traction.
Coerced consent for non-essential functions is illegal in many places, and that’s number is rapidly growing.
Did they? I've never heard of deepL, and Google Translate still has close to 1 billion users.
Type imports are the worst.
$ cat ai.txt
no