skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If publishers aren’t paying, what did you mean by this, exactly:

> Publishers' relevance on, say, Google, relies partly on sponsored contents. They pay Google for this.

I understand that Google has optimized to avoid the user clicking away. Obviously, this has been done to keep eyeballs and revenue but it is also arguably in the user’s interest as they accomplish their goals faster.

The logical response for this is not to force Google to pay for listing and summarizing links, but to evolve your own business model. Say by moving towards richer, more thoughtful content and analysis that can’t be trivially summarized and might even support a non-ad-based model, such as subscriptions or donations. (I pay for quite a few subscriptions that host content like this.) The basic news business has obviously become increasingly commoditized, and I don’t think anything Google does is going to change this.

The Wikipedia example is actually supporting the viability of good content being a defense for commoditization, not the argument that Google needs to pay content creators to survive. I don’t think there’s any evidence to support the idea that Google summarizing in a one box has harmed Wikipedia, as the Wikimedia foundation has continued to substantially grow its revenue every year and is at all time highs. Arguably, this is because they host content that is sufficiently rich that they are bound to have a decent click-through rate; whereas many news publishers are basically rewriting AP releases with little value add.

> They should be if Chipotle was virtually the only restaurant in town, and the only way for you to get food, which is essentially what Google is in the search space.

It is a strange proposition that if someone doesn’t like the only restaurant in town then it has a moral obligation to close its doors. It’s not like you have an obligation to go there; in this analogy consider opening a new restaurant as trying to do direct ad selling, but you can just as easily “cook at home” by shifting your business model. It might be different if the business was critical and had total monopoly (e.g. water, power) but I’m not sure this holds here.

Just as the restaurant is not required to cater to your specific tastes, I don’t think Google should be required to subsidize a specific publishing business model. It feels like a very narrow form of digital Luddism. Now maybe they are somewhat parasitic in this case, and would be smart to figure an more mutually beneficial arrangement (just as the restaurant would be smart to cater broadly to local tastes), but I wouldn’t go so far as to say “should” or expect any mandate to do so.
If it was really that good there'd be plenty of great open source implementations and tools by now, but in reality nobody wants to use it. Note that protobuf didn't have this issue.
or append "for example"
I'm dumb struck that any design focused company can ship white text on a grey background.
Possibly misleading indeed, but not wrong: the state that the phone is in at the moment ownership of the phone changes from Google to the customer has bootloader unlocking disabled.
Generally speaking your data-science stuff wouldn't fit into the serverless bucket anyway though.

Also generally Python is just used for terminal processing in the Big Data world, all the pieces in between are JVM anyway.
It was a different time. In general, things happened more slowly. Things were a lot less interconnected and a lot less transparent from the outside. Information was really hard to get. It was a good time. It was also a time that I would probably find incredibly frustrating to get anything done in if I were to suddenly be transported back.
> - turn off the phoning home without breaking local functionality

Start with Windows, iOS (Siri), and pretty much any updateable software.
Architect Yasmeen Lari: ‘The international colonial charity model never works’
So the US who "has been the one demanding they stop existing" covertly places explosives on 3/4 pipes, and ignores the last pipe despite direct proximity to the others?

"Russia has been the one wanting all the pipelines open this whole time"
Key word is "wanting", they were not getting it, Germany made is clear they were not getting it.
This one was bigger than my fist!
I had the opposite experience. I worked at companies in the past that had legacy codebases that were strung together by inexperienced programmers years ago. This meant:

- The code was basically just spaghetti with differing standards and architectures depending what area you were in. Making even the most simple changes or basic features would often break something else in unexpected ways.

- There were never any tests, and in one company's case, they even had a no comments policy "because the code changed often and they didn't want to maintain the comments' accuracy".

- Said companies did not have the money (or want to spend it) in rewriting any significant portion of the apps, despite them being on years ago abandoned frameworks.

- In one case, this meant we had to patch a web framework and maintain it ourselves because of security vulnerabilities.

I realize maybe the author worked on established but not-so-bad projects, but working on a greenfield is imo the far better experience. You can actually push for standards, create impactful features in a timely manner, and do refactors without fear that 20 other things are going to break because the architecture is fresh in your mind, documented and you have up-to-date regression tests.

The author also seems to primarily be afraid they'll do something sub-optimally and have to delete code. I actually love deleting code. Some of the most satisfying refactors I've done involve cutting down on complexity and removing portions of code. I get that you don't want to waste effort, but I don't think it's a healthy attitude to have toward your code if you get negative emotions over finding better solutions.
~15/20ug is the dose an experienced person would percievably be able to notice, so microdosing is below this.

75ug is the lower end of the recreational scale. I first ever started with ~50ug (which honestly I'd recommend for beginners) and I had antidepressents in my system so it's effect is dulled a bit - and that was a giggly, eyes-full-of-wonder, oversaturated, and slight motion inpainting, wonderful experience. There was no way anyone mistakes that for being sober.

That said the come-up at any dose and any experience level is hilarious because everyone is always like "is it hitting yet?" as it progressively becomes more intense.

tl;dr - placebo could fool even some experienced users if they know they're being given a really low dose. The treatment group would absolutely know no matter how much experience you have.

https://psychonautwiki.org/wiki/LSD

EDIT: Sidenote, safety first friends. Always use two different reagents to test, and always have a plan to control anxiety in case of bad trips.
> TBH, I don't think that you know how the law works better than judges and magistrates do.

TBH, I don't think you do either, but I also know that kind of argument isn't useful here on HN.

> You know what a loophole is, right?

Yes, it's a layman's term that has no real legal meaning, and exists only in the eye of the beholder. What one person calls a tax loophole, another person recognizes as policy that a subset of legislators ensured existed in a bill.

You think tax loopholes are there by accident?
There are also FOSS front-ends for Google Play such as Aurora Store
Did the EU create the usb-c plug or was this standard enforced only after it already existed and was a de-facto standard for everything non-Apple?
Doctorow coined the term "enshitification" for this.

Previous discussions: https://hn.algolia.com/?q=enshitification
> cons of serverless:

> Turns all your code into spagetti, this is probably the biggest one.

Overall agree with you, but I don't think spaghetti is the right term here - even if the typo is corrected :)

Spaghetti code is more of a term for monolithic mess where you have a hard time following all the code logic (cyclomatic complexity) and dependencies.

Understanding & tracking dependencies is actually easier with serveless, it's pretty clear what dependency that one tiny micro service has.

But where it becomes worse is regarding the code logic mess, you've now turned it in a distributed system problem where, in addition to having a even hard time with cyclomatic complexity, you also have to think about transient failures/retries at each service boundaries.

That and the other problems you describe (performance hit etc)
I assume what they mean is the existing market will have to become explicitly labeled and advertise its advantages over AI-generated content.
Generative AI is at the point where it can BS at a college level. This is great for applications where things don't need to be right (disinformation bots, term papers), but doesn't work when there's little room for error (software engineering). It's already being used to write ad copy; I'm waiting for the first lawsuit because of a deceptive ad on Google.
It's USB-C but we reformulated the cable plastic for slightly longer release so it's now USB-Cxr. New patent, double the price but we're going to reuse the certification.
Any chance you’re using third party extra long lightning cables? I’ve gone through many of those and they all die the same way.
The person you replied to did not imply that there was a difference in safety between lightning and usbc, they just used safety as an example of regulated standards with which to attack your reasoning. The EU is mostly seeking to reduce waste by standardising common parts.
> the same 8 hours of battery life, or more

Why? My new M1 did maybe 5 hours on the battery. Got worse as it aged over a year.
I dipped my toe ever so cautiously into "smart home" territory last year, buying three "smart" lightbulbs at the Apple Store, but only talking to them over Bluetooth.

(At least, I think I'm only doing that: I suppose it's possible the software that talks to them via BT got them on my WiFi without my permission? Doubtful but hmmm...)

Anyway at some point there was a software update to the controller app and it couldn't find them. After much back and forth, I uninstalled that app, and the iPhone's iHome or whatever app then recognized two of them, but not the third. That one started freaking out and randomly turning itself on and off.

Now it's mostly off, but comes on for a bit about once a week. Yes, I'm lazy about changing lightbulbs.

All this drama for... freakin' lightbulbs that can change color. Doesn't make me want to further smartify my home.

I figure some simple fake LED candles are my future mood lighting. I'd spring for a Mathmos Lava Lamp[0] if they didn't look like sex toys.

[0]: https://mathmos.com/lava-lamps/lava-lamps-for-children-and-a...
> Which is a reflection of an intensely unequal distribution of income.

Which is a reflection of an intensely unequal distribution of productivity and value creation.

I've also lived under communism, where they ignored this uneven contribution and tried to squash the incomes uniformly. The result was quite predictable: we were equally starving, of course. Except the nomenklatura, but that's another story.
I'm not sure if this is a joke or not. I know lots of young people, myself included, who don't have tinnitus and also like V8s or V-twins motorcycles in my case.
since the switch to lightning there is an even larger number of devices and docks all designed around lightning and very few of their customers wanted or asked for usb-c

Data? I live in an Apple bubble (friends, family, myself included) and most of them wished that the iPhone used USB-C, everything else uses USB-C (iPad included).

The silliest time was (and lasted pretty long) when if you bought a new MacBook and a new iPhone, you couldn't actually charge/connect the iPhone to the MacBook. I mean, this was even derided in Mac podcasts, etc.
I feel like this is like saying I don't use autocomplete because I still have to type...
That study says that the risk factor is red meat consumption, not seed oils:

> The typical American and Northern European diet is high in omega-6 FAs, with the average person having an omega-6 to omega-3 FA intake ratio between 15:1 and 18:1. These populations tend to overconsume red meat and underconsume unprocessed oils and cold-water fish.
No, by 1804 the "Black Jacobins" were mostly deported with Toussaint L'Ouverture already dead.

That other Hatians committed atrocities does not detract from L'Ouverture's legacy.
I do not think people in general need maximum contrast. What they need is near optimal contrast and there are objective recommendations on how to achieved it.

What we often have instead is barely readable light gray text in the name of "clean" design. Well it is not clean, it is moronic. If creators disrespects potential readers that much they might as well present blank screen and be done with it.
Alexa isn’t any better either. I had Alexa’s in each room and when I used to ask her to start the AC, it would start AC in some other room (this is after assigning the Alexa and AC to that particular room). That right there is a deal breaker for me, I can’t keep telling my guests every time what’s the room called and have them remember it.
You wouldn't be having the LLM be a security monitor. Rather the LLM would be used as an aide to generate the policy which already existing enforcement mechanisms would enforce.
> If researchers could easily browse papers relevant to them I think they would dump publishers all together. The expense of prestige can't hold up over time against a more efficient model that costs way less.

arXiv is an emerging solution. The peer review bit is missing.

https://arxiv.org/category_taxonomy

ArXiv.org Reaches a Milestone and a Reckoning 2022:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/arxiv-org-reaches...
> Python is a good enough Lisp, as Peter Norvig has concluded. And it’s got all batteries included. Ain‘t nothing it can’t do.

I almost agree, but Python fails in one area, which happens to be my current area of interest. It doesn't have sufficiently strict encapsulation to support object capabilities[0] at the language level.

JavaScript, on the other hand, does[1] - so you don't necessarily need Lisp for this, but I do enjoy the parentheses. :)

[0] http://habitatchronicles.com/2017/05/what-are-capabilities/

[1] https://medium.com/agoric/pola-would-have-prevented-the-even...
Why do you think Americans suffer from tinnitus more than other nationalities?
GPT3.5 easily spat out a working answer in response to "Write an HTTP and JavaScript page, as laconically as possible, that takes a list of newline separated strings from a textbox, and divides them randomly into `n` groups, where `n` is set with a text box."

Using ChatGPT to code effectively requires internalizing the small sliding context window and correct specification of the problem-space. You can get real work done if you thoughtfully split your project into parts, and you can save time by jumping back to a contextual fork where your program was fully specified.
Americans like it because when you sit in a big V8 and smash the accelerator it jolts you forward and pins you in the seat while the engine is roaring like a lion. It's fun, like going down a hill in a rollercoaster. That's really all there is to it. Hearing it makes you think of the fun yourself.
You do see that we're discussing the underlying principle here, right? Please, try to put aside the specifics of the exact hardware and understand that what matters here is the EU's descent into attempting to centrally plan technology. This tendency isn't specific to power cables, it's a clear trend across many sectors.
One of my recent conclusions is that it's not so much that Kubernetes on its own is so very complicated; it's that if someone tries to glue their own container platform together from Kubernetes plus another dozen or so cloud-native projects and integrate the whole thing, it can get wickedly complex very quickly.
What is high-quality about the data that trained generative AI?
Maybe archive the project? No shame in that game it shows clear intent
you mean comparing before and after COVID? longitudinal is better, but those take more time to produce so these kinds of studies come first. Also, almost everyone has COVID now, so it's even harder to do that.

It's a lil crazy that people are so willing to say well we let it rip, and because of that, we can ignore any problematic findings because we can't compare current populations easily and across long periods of time. The most likely hypothesis, based on known mechanisms and studies, is that yes, COVID infection will fuck you up. This is the case with most human pathogenic viruses, even ones that have a "mild" initial presentation like EBV (multiple schlerosis), CMV (wears down immune system in old age), Chickenpox (shingles), HPV (cancer), or HIV (immune dysfunction).

The fun thing is, COVID sometimes has an acute life-threatening aspect as well, so it is probably double the fun.
You're welcome to bring numbers rather than hand-waving to this argument.
Really it's business people, and they haven't forgotten so much as they've recognized that software is more profitable.
You're missing the point. It's not that Lightning is bad, it's probably great (I don't have any iThings to compare). But left to themselves, it's entirely plausible that Apple will just abandon it in a few years in favor of some exciting new technology called Laser or Quantum or Telluric. Sure, people will complain, but they'll upgrade because there are some other great new features on the iPhone 17, plus clinging to old stuff makes people feel poor.
Jungle Town is a docuseries about a charismatic eco-evangelicist/property developer who charges interns $5000 to help build his sustainable village in the Panama jungle.

The interesting thing about the doco is that the film maker seems to get converted midway. At the start the founder is portrayed as a obvious charlatan but by the end he is presented in a much more favorable light.
This is the most relevant part that Python misses out from Lisp.

There is PyPy, and apparently Mojo will change the world, but still not something to rely on like on Lisps.

I guess there is always Julia.
The title is precisely correct, but it is easy to infer wrongly "and you can't enable it".
Two notes:

- only open standard design can operate together with not-too-much issues;

- actual state of home automation is a directionless mess.

About the first point: the most common protocol for "smart devices"/home appliances, those who can actually talk to something else regardless of the vendor is ModBUS, a serial protocol from the '70s. The newer MQTT, Kafka etc are very rarely supported on commercial devices. Long story short: the sole way we can get different tools from different OEMs playing together is that such interoperability is mandatory by law, carefully tested, with sanctions when found absent. Without that NO OEM will really be interoperable with anything, it's own products together included.

For the second point: MOST home automation is just about flipping switches with some logic behind, the rest is just monitoring. A VERY SIMPLE THING, unfortunately almost no vendor and perhaps also most designers have no clue about how and what to automate. Even the more expensive and trendy tools, like p.v. systems to be potentially integrated with car charging systems etc aren't really integrated even under a single OEM umbrella.

Essentially: just invest in home automation if you really want to do something and be prepared to long frustration, high costs and unreliable, fragile stuff.
Passing the exam doesn’t make you a good lawyer.
> You can't say well obviously that decision was bad, but this one is good.

I absolutely can and will say that.

A football manager can make bad decisions and lose 5-0, and yet the same manager can then win the next game with the same team. Furthermore, in the case of the EU, these are not even the same people, context, or decision.
It's in that direction, but I think existing right to repair legislation stops short of the right to exclude dependency on the manufacturer's infrastructure entirely.
I stopped using Google products a long time ago. Seeing articles like this and hearing what others are dealing with just encourages me to see that I made the right choice.
I see the anti-K8S sentiment so much on hackernews. Sure, there’s a time and a place for K8S, but I see a lot of point-blank objection to it for often weak reasons.
While not quite hackable, I just bought (today) a Minisforum UM773 with 32G DDR5 RAM, 512G NVMe, and an AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (8C/16T - 3.2GHz base clock). Paid $579 shipped to my door. Both the RAM and NVMe drive are easily upgradable. Gonna use it as an ESXi lab node.
> because this study wouldn’t have been published if it had found the opposite

please cite sources
Catching Up to a Great Film That I Waited Decades to See
No, it's not mature at all at this point.
Finblox is launching FinGPT

https://www.bsc.news/post/finblox-fbx-announces-fingpt-ai-pl...
I'm not a designer, but personally I like to reserve the extreme colors for the rare occasions you need something "blacker than black" or the equivalent with your color.
Reviewers are paid by not having to pay for reviews of their own papers. To be sure, many reviews are not worth the time to read them, but the good ones have been invaluable to increasing the quality of my work.
Have you tried this link? It was top of mind for me, due to recent discussions around HN "slash links" [1]:

Jobs at YC Startups - https://news.ycombinator.com/jobs

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/lists
ChatGPT is powered by contractors making $15 an hour
As always, there's a good classic sci-fi story on this subject: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profession_(novella)

Except kids learn everything with tapes, updated and improved using new knowledge created by a rare few, beamed into their heads rather than depending on LLMs.

It's also a Stargate episode: https://www.gateworld.net/sg1/s3/learning-curve/
> I've never been able to strip the tread off a nut using just the strength of my bear hands (:p).

I have. small metric 10 nut.

Also, with almost no effort you can strip the threads in spark plugs holes (aluminium head).
Yeah I completely agree with all of that.
Yeah healthcare is the one thing I want financial security for. Big house, nice car, expensive food is all whatever, but I have some weird paranoia that in the next 30-40 years some longevity treatment will start rolling out or I will develop some condition that I will be priced out of.
> But I do have done physical dumb devices

Can you rephrase this? I don't understand the point you're making. Two verbs against the same subject but with different temporal context, perhaps you stuggle with communicating sometimes?
I see this more on twitter to be honest. HN, of late, has been a great source of info on the ‘boring’ stacks e.g Rails.

Twitter is where you get the JavaScript ‘influencers’ who appeal to a core demographic of engineers with FOMO who signal their ‘in status’ by waxing lyrical about the latest framework
Journals operate in an information brokerage business and they are compensated to ensure reasonable review of what they publish. What you wrote would be applicable to something like reddit but you can't accept funds for a job that you don't carry out.
bobloblawslawblog
Reminder, HN is built/runs-on a dialect of Lisp (Arc).

On a single server.

On a single core.
Thanks, this reply is better than the article's
Hardware companies get a lot of flak for inadquate software. On the other hand, software companies have no idea what kind of commitment it means to launch a product line. Hardware companies don't do this without determining lifespan/support window ahead of time and designing for it; sw companies basically do whatever, you can always shut it down.
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35711078