skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>But everyone else makes significantly less. While pay scales have increased on a per-episode basis, TV show seasons are less than half as long as they were before, and streamers don't pay royalties, so absolute pay decreased substantially.

But if seasons are half as long, can't writers write twice as many seasons, canceling that effect out?
You could try https://sourcegraph.com/search

Though GitHub will probably have all the same features eventually and cheaper too.
There is a new breed of Journalists that are clearing the malaise. They need to invent a different professional title as “Journalist” is now tainted.
Ok, it seems like you are going through a lot right now

I get it, it’s hard sometimes

You will hate this advice, but hopefully that will help you remember it

Come back to the present moment

Feel your toes inside your shoes
Breath consciously
Fee your heartbeat
Listen to the sounds around you
Close your eyes
Open your eyes when ready

Wish you love on your path
> Don't build your CI/CD pipelines; use Vercel or something similar

I'd give exactly the opposite advice. Being able to properly debug your CI/CD code, or even run locally, has been a godsend when you're starting up.
I can't believe it wasn't more explosive at the time, but this whole tale from Ali Soufan of the FBI that he told the New Yorker in 2006 is absolutely harrowing. The CIA explicitly withheld a single piece of intel that he had requested that could have lead them to prevent 9/11.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2006/07/10/the-agent
I don't disagree with you, I'm just devil's advocating/showing an alternative viewpoint:

> Is there any need for _more_ than a command line interface?

Reworded: is there any need to make this harder to access than the equivalent of:

* kube-forwarder + open Chrome to http://localhost:3000

* ssh -L ...

* ngrok ...
So. The article is comparing Kanban done right with Scrum done wrong. That doesn't seem fair.
What if your file won’t even get into the ATS?

Alles that you’re very technical, might even offer engineer any solution I want.

Hiring managers are usually not this kind of nerds.
GPU's win for training... And those who write papers and publish code tend to do lots of training and only a little inference.
But it has made the PA Consultings of this world a lot of money doing "agile transformations".
"Well don't you look at me like that, you certainly wouldn't be in any danger"
IIRC isn't NAC similar? It's not carcinogenic itself, but the benefits it provides also extend to the cancer cells?
Okay class... Everyone's trains are great. We don't need to compare. Trains are cool. Lets just encourage and build more of them.
From my point of view, yes, it does. And in most cases there is nothing wrong with it. Just not hyped. Probably, the only real reason to use something like OAuth2.0/OIDC is single sign-on. (BTW, probably all SSO providers use cookies and sessions to maintain their own user state).
there's obviously a strong family resemblance, but scheme's focus on purity over practicality lends to a much different feel.

one of the illustrations from this 20 year old discussion that someone linked here a bit ago [t] was that, while you might say c is a 'member of the algol family', you wouldn't say that c 'is an algol'.
perhaps an extreme example, but the idea is that lisp having a history of multiple implementations doesn't make scheme one of them.

put another way- while schemes extrapolate on a similar kind of purity to that which lisps are already famous for, giving them a kind of 'more lisp than lisp' aura, that shouldn't negate the language split.

[t] https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.lisp/c/Bj8Hx6mZEYI (perhaps skim kent pitman's posts for a summary)
And what parent post described is functionally equivalent to CRL it's a list of user (id, earliestValidTokenTimestamp) which for case of invalidating all sessions on demand serves same purpose. The only major problem is timely sync of those lists in all clients. Same problem as with CRLs, but probably lighter. And of course with other set of limitations.
Which is why I am fearful of the future. When Gabe retires, what happens then? I suspect Microsoft/Google/EA/anybody have already offered sweet-heart billion dollar acquisitions offers. Will the next CEO continue to turn down those deals?
When you assign a meaning to something, you are merely establishing a relationship between two systems which is information itself. It does not add information to either of the two systems. It merely creates third system with it's own information.

For instance, if you have the state "H" and want to add a meaning to it "High Temperature" you need to create a third piece of information "H" -> "High Temperature"

You are not changing the information in "H" or "High Temperature" you are merely creating a third piece of information which is the lambda.
I would be extremely annoyed if the only way to get the computer's attention were to enter the Lord's Prayer (or any other text of similar length) :-). I might well express my annoyance using the word "ritual". But it would still feel much much less ritual-y than if I were using the Lord's Prayer in a more conventional manner, because there would still be no element of psychological/spiritual/social significance to the person performing the action.

(And, although it would still be the case that you have to enter all those words in order to get the computer's attention, and therefore they have instrumental purpose, it seems to me like that's a harder argument to make with a straight face when the arbitrary complexity of the actions you're taking becomes very large.)

I agree (of course) that it's complicated, and not an all-or-nothing affair. As I said, I consider C-A-D only about 99.5% not a ritual. The Lord's Prayer version might be only 90% not a ritual.

Curiously, in one respect using the Lord's Prayer to try to get God's attention is less ritual-y than using it to try to get a computer's: everything in that prayer is there for an actual instrumental purpose! Someone praying it sincerely isn't just saying "forgive us our sins" because those are the traditionally mandated words[1], but also because they would like their sins forgiven and they at-least-kinda-think that saying those words will make that happen a bit more reliably.

[1] Well, depending on what sort of traditional you want to be you might have to say "trespasses" instead.
> Ah, yes, lets add exclusive flock support to all binaries in the existence, just in case.

You are aware that flock(1) is a thing, right? And that a defacto core tenet of UNIX is composability of disparate programs that do one thing well?
I worked with Software AG webMethods for quite a while and always wondered about building something like this. Nice job.
Can you read the terms of service for this without logging in?
Valid question. My statement is a bit vague. I see AI as a disruptive technology similar to the printing press or radio. It enables regular people to accomplish task that were previously difficult. I can see it becoming a tool that makes some major companies obsolete in the way it opens up new paths. But fair point, a lot of these AI advancements are being pushed forward by large corporations like Microsoft and Google. It’s obvious that AI as a tool will be used for good and evil. Tech companies who wish to survive see the necessity to get in on the bottom floor of this technological leap forward.

Either way, my observation is simply that I could see a lot of parties finding the advancement of human potential through AI to be harmful to the status quo that they comfortably exist in.
In short: it's bad, particularly if the round tumbles. Lightweight, high-velocity it is. Wound ballistics for this and the previous rifle were all well-known in ancient times.
Right now, I just click "CMD+M" when I'm done. But I'll add an issue to the repo and look into adding something
Why Scalable Monitoring Is Essential for Modern, Distributed Systems
> making it difficult for the credit card company to stop these transactions.

I would of had them cancel the card and issue a brand new one.
Few weeks back I posted a comment on Instagram.
A warning popped up that it wasn't as per community standards.

I understood that it was wrongthink, so I immediately deleted my comment.

The warning system on Instagram comments is good for protecting you from committing Thoughtcrime.
> Facebook complies with the local governments' requirements everywhere it operates

That sounds like a rule that's applied consistently, to every country. And yes, I know it's weasel words that mean exactly the opposite of what they appear to mean.
And while your at it, cancel your phone number?
Oh my goodness, yes, I meant pathogenic. What a silly and fitting insult.

I'm not familiar with how effective any kind of prescribed bacterial community recolonization is compared to probiotics or not doing anything.

I think the only FDA approved routes are enema and fecal transfer. I know there are capsule versions in the works, but I don't think they are FDA approved.
I am not speaking in absolutes. I typed out specifically a section just for you to tell you that I am not speaking in absolutes. As I said, the reason you think this is because you didn't read what I am saying carefully enough.

I won't bother replying or reading this for obvious reasons. Good luck.
Thanks for the heads up, home page or any page in particular?

It’s ok for me but I’ll check the logs.

It’s just a basic fly.io setup at the moment but it should be more than capable of dealing with the traffic - just html (and htmx) front end and Sinatra back end.

It stood up pretty well to the traffic last time.
Let's imagine Facebook, we can partition the monolith by user, but you would need the entire code base (50+ million lines?) running in each process just in case a user wants to access that functionality. I'm not saying one can't build a billion dollar business using a monolith, but at some point the limit of what a single process can host might become a problem.
Got a demo?

I am working on a smart RSS reader that uses transformers and other models to cluster and classify feed items. One feed item I incorporate is high-ranking comments from the HN API. I did try feeding all comments into the system for a short time and felt it was way too much.

I haven't put a lot of effort into quantifying it, but my system seems to do OK with HN comments mixed in with other content. I think the possibility of a comment-only feed looks promising.
The fact that you were at Meta massively outweighs the job hopping imo. So I think you're fine :)

Also, if you job hop a bit and then spend at least 2-3 years in a single job, you're totally fine. Nobody faults someone for hopping early on.
That's what a lot of low code platforms are trying to achieve.
Yeah, thanks but no thanks

These have been tried multiple times and always ends up as an also-ran. Same for things like GWT

Nobody wants to duplicate effort and this is why those types of SDK go away eventually
The point I was trying to make is that wishlist, shopping cart, and similar features were missing for the longest time, not at all what you'd consider "extra, non-core features it took Steam two decades to build"
Yep, it’s a terrible idea but that’s exactly what frameworks like Rais push you to do.
Resort fees are still everywhere. You gotta pay for that pool access and two water bottles per day!

At least Marriott will start displaying them in the booking process: https://onemileatatime.com/news/marriott-display-rates-trans...
In these modern times I don't think any company actually trusts the contractors that have been hired to make a product.

You (some big name company) hire some company to make 10,000 widgets; your contractors may turn around and make 300,000 widgets sell you the 10,000 widgets per the agreement and sell the other 290,000 into other channels. They may sell the ones that didn't pass QA, they may make ones with cheaper parts, etc.

How do you stop this? See above - the part has to phone home and you can enable it (or not!) because you've got a registry of which things are legit and which aren't.

Also, this lets the companies spy on you. Errr.. Collect telemetry to allow them to improve the product.
Data is not available upon request
And the end game [for the newspaper] is to get rid of articles, puzzles, cartoons, letters from readers, get rid of subscriptions and go 100% advertisement. It is entirely possible for google to go there. Search being free is really half way there already.
Is Xbox losing money? Even if it is not mega-profitable, having a consumer device sitting in many living rooms has got to be worth something. If nothing else, as a gateway to Game Pass.

If you are looking at weirdo things - Microsoft still makes keyboards. That has to be such a minuscule part of the business as to be completely irrelevant.
Setting up shader precomp is apparently a manual process that can be really developer intensive, especially in open world titles. That said, I agree, there is a lot of low hanging fruit that can be handled. Devs seem to be deciding between all or nothing and often just pick the nothing path.
Addendum: This only works if the hiring manager is a nerd like me
Oh so an .exe
Neither were the purported child sacrifices dying en masse in Aztec civilization.

We absolutely celebrate the slow death of the poor as a necessary sacrifice in the face of economic growth and dividends. Just not always in the same breath. The fittest grow and the weakest adapt, or don't. Believing that when they don't is a tragedy, is not an effective way of mitigating tragedy, and indeed can serve as an affirming and normalizing act in and of itself.

"That's a tragedy, but that's the way it is"
Until and unless we get better battery chemistries that are not reliant on LI, you're going to find someone who will work with Chile's requirements.

It's a suppliers market and Chile has decided to "eminent domain" their resources and remove private ownership from the game, as is their right.

Yesterday would have been the best time to do this, and now is the next best time. At some point battery chemistries will shift to Na or solid state will take the crown, but until then...
> A simple example is in my previous home when I had a section of the master bedroom closet partially walled around a Class C TL-30 rated safe, and the room partially reconstructed with ballistic armor in the walls and a vault door, to turn it into a safe room for valuables + home protection.

But... why? This does not seem like a typical use case.
Especially given the history of the last 30 years where major open source licenses carefully fought over just how much "commercial code" could use the works involved.
let me restate, they're not "blocking the description of a Yubikey" either. You can register one, and in fact I just did to try it out. The Yubikey needs to be configured with a PIN which you do through Yubikey manager. They're blocking authenticators that don't have additional protection other than just presence.

> That's exactly what I mean when I say it wouldn't be sufficient

I think we're confusing what the role of a standard is, versus what other features can be built around a standard capability. With an open fabric, vendors like KeePassXC can allow exports in formats that can then be imported by other sync fabrics as I described previously. The standard mandating it would be a good reason for vendors not to adopt the standard, or adopt a crippled version. Given the fact that WebAuthn ties capabilites to the authenticator at registration time I think it's understandable that vendors like Apple want give RPs assurance that keys are entirely contained in an ecosystem that guarantees those assertions. You will have options, including not using Apple/Microsoft/Google's sync fabrics, and to move off these sync fabrics if you consider them insufficient, but not by exporting keys directly.

> I really don't see how this is an out-of-scope problem for the FIDO Alliance (...) It's not really that different than a spec for logging in using a standardized QR code

Logging in using a QR code or BLE is part of the hybrid transport in CTAP, which deals with how authenticators communicate with clients. It's very much within FIDO. Establishing trust between devices in different ecosystems to form a circle of trust so that key material can be shared doesn't really have anything to do with logging in to services, so it's not WebAuthn. It also doesn't deal with client to authenticator communication as there's no client. If anything, a standard like TPM (ISO/IEC 11889) is a better fit, but probably too low level for that exact use case.

> Which I think is pretty reasonable given that every single instance of attestation in the past has been used for DRM

Going back to attestation, I don't think that in general it's in the best interest of services to not allow you to log in to them, but I can see a bank in their typical backwards-fashion issuing some branded keys and only letting you use those (Symantec, I'm looking at you). The reality is that standard or not, if RPs want this functionality, it'll be there. Standards simply attempt to provide the bare minimum for interoperability that every party can agree to. The alternative is not an attestation-free world. It's a bank asking you to log in with a flawed key they purchased from an ancient vendor because there's no standard offering that does what they want. I'd much rather have a Bank of America branded Yubikey with enterprise attestation using WebAuthn than some weak and poorly implemented proprietary token like the ones they issue today.
Who's telling you that? Although I know of this story, I've been wearing one all this time, save for a few years of folly with an Apple Watch 4. In fact, I just picked up a new one two days ago since I left my old one in another country. No police has ever given me trouble (e: am from Middle Eastern country and have had more LE interactions at the airport than most people)

I love not having to charge it and not having to worry about bumping it into anything.

(My new watch is a slightly updated model - W-217H-9AVCF, which is a little bigger and has a brighter, more even light in amber)

PS: Nobody's going to think you're a terrorist if you drive a Toyota, either.
Technology should never be painful. If it is, it means you're doing it wrong. The fact that you have to put in work and tell the technology you have this shape in two different places is a code smell. The system is telling you the approach is wrong when you are working for the technology instead of the technology working for you.
Data center power costs are expected to triple in the next 5 years, likely due to advanced CPU/GPU/tensor usage.

These things are linked.

Anything that burns power will likely have margins and people will never ever give up potential margins.
Don’t know what users here think about posting links to one’s own site, but I’ll risk it. I migrated from gmail to proton, and wrote down the steps and experience. [1]

Should be the same for tutanota or others, don’t know about migration script (easy switch) of others, though. For me it worked without any hiccups.

[1] https://blog.metters.dev/posts/leaving-gmail-behind/
Definitely agree that the line is blurry. 2 in 4 years is fine, especially in 2023 when the most recent short stint can be explained by widespread layoffs
Recent discussion:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35837330

A cryptocurrency company had a $65M bill, per Datadog’s Q1 earnings call (twitter.com/turnernovak)
78 points by slyall 2 days ago | 57 comments
It's an interesting theory, but as often is the case, the title is far more definite than the content.
I like my public roads and public transportation. Now you have heard of someone.
Changes I Would Like to See in Game Development and Industry
I think it's fine for the case where running the operation more than once at a time isn't incorrect, but potentially wastes resources.
If the user has no money his eye balls aren't worth much.
The grid system of wxWidgets also works like that.

It has drag-and-drop design tools, and copy-paste, and it can be written programmatically.

So the best of both worlds exists, and it is just not used enough.

wxWidgets has Python bindings.
The last seven times I needed to transfer requested medical records involved phone calls, fax machines, CD-ROMs, physical stacks of paper, or some combination.
Quora is next... I don't have anything against it, but I see hardly a reason to go to Quora anymore.
The font will be Computer Modern, that's the most obvious one.
Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex Instructions
No LaTeX. Use Word like a civilized person. Everything goes through an ATS now, and those like Word documents. Hiring managers, HR, and recruiters will thank you.
US govt. creates new disinformation office to oversee all the other ones
> Might I ask what makes you feel it is poisoning?

I definitely didn't mean to imply that I necessarily believe its poisoning. Apparently the neurotic and anti-interventionist in me reared its head when reading the thread.

I didn't recognize any of the supplement names, and so I didn't realize they all had reasonable safety profiles (individually?).

I think my point still stands though. From what I saw, the outcomes were deemed positive as a function of subjective reports of well-being, without controls. It seems plausible the protocol is having any range of effects (from negative to null to positive)— I just didn't see anything other than placebo-uncontrolled anecdata.

This is not to discount their efforts! I am truly interested in the subject.
I like this perspective, especially with how harsh the hiring market is today
> had this vision of an information utopia where everyone

When it comes to new technology and the impact it will have people are almost always wrong. The printing press not only made better books, it created oceans of shitty ones.

We didn't have https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law at the time to warn us.
> No, I think it's a very sensible assumption.

The problem is it's an "assumption" that is rarely easy to correct when it's wrong.

> As far as I can see, virtually every GNU/Linux OS has shared libraries in /use/lib, and it even has crude support for versioning.

If that were a satisfactory assumption there would be no need for sledgehammer solutions like docker.

> it even has crude support for versioning.

which is extremely unstandardised and frequently goes very wrong and will end up compiling against a mismatched set of headers and libraries.

> Nix's approach is a break from the norm, so really it has the responsibility of maintaining compatibility.

It doesn't really have any responsibility for anything apart from doing what its users want from it. And by and large it does that.

> the existing standard Python tools everyone uses

The "existing standard python tools" (pip, virtualenv, pyenv, tox...) are ~5 different attempts at solving the same problem, but each time failing to do so, giving rise to yet another tool. Properly applied, Nix can address all of them.

It really doesn't sound like you want Nix at all - you appear to be arguing for the de-facto standard approach from the last 2-3 decades, which is not what Nix is. It is a deliberate departure from that. These design decisions that appear to annoy you aren't arbitrary choices that Nix people made to be difficult, they are core to how Nix works.

If you want something that will present a facade that it's a linux system from the last 2 decades while still appearing to give you some of the advantages of isolated/pseudo-reproducible environments, what you want is docker.
Freethink Special Issue: Creativity and A.I
Add extra features... because of the implications
Netdata v1.39 just released, introducing a major change in monitoring. Now Netdata not only trains multiple ML models for each and every metric collected, but also Netdata Charts use an ML-first approach, revealing all the power of ML instantly!