skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Understood and I agree with most of what you said here. Thank you for clarifying.

I've just personally crossed a threshold where I can't avoid the fact I use enough of it that I should be paying for it. I'd like to think I'd just boycott it entirely if I decided it was too expensive. Not sure if that'd be true in practice. I'd definitely boycott the official app, though - the experience is pretty bad.

Historically, I've avoided using a non-official app due to some questionable distribution methods for some of them, and due to not wanting to anger Google into shutting my account off for non-supported access. The latter is why I no longer use Google search nor Gmail anymore.
Yep that's it; JWTs are signed, that's how they work.
I thought about this for a while but towing cables (tho high maintenance) are so much simpler. Have some wind propellers and/or solar by the side of the road with very little conversion and transport. Hook up any vehicle. It works when it works, when it doesn't it isn't a big deal. If someone hits the breaks everyone slows down. Make it big for trucks, small for few vehicles or even smaller for bicycles, roller skates, soap boxes, robot taxi's, etc walking dogs, making sure employees arrive at work on time. and so on
Write it in Markdown and let Pandoc turn it into LaTeX or whatever you desire
You'd lose more weight from the plastic components outgassing.
> An external chat service can be a pain in the ass just like a microservice.

Of course, because it’s just someone else’s microservice. Socially, it’s nice to have someone else take care of it. But technically, it’s more opaque than even your own microservices.

> Depending if you want a lot of business rules integrated in that chat, you will have to keep data synced between your server and the chat's server.

Right, because both the chat and your core service share users. So the boundary criteria for microservices, ie being standalone, is not there with chat, or many other types of services.

From a technical perspective, these services would be better suited as libraries that require some integration work. However, that’s not conducive to usage based pricing, which is the snake within the microservice oil bottle.
> A startup called CarbiCrete is also developing carbon-negative concrete. Instead of cement, the company uses waste slag from steel-making in its concrete mix, and uses carbon dioxide captured from industrial plants to cure the concrete. One downside is that the concrete has to be pre-formed and cannot be poured and set on site.

What a big obstacle to adoption — too many building techniques rely on on-site pouring, I hope they can engineer some solution.
How we work: inclusive retrospectives for the GitHub Accessibility leadership t
Yes, over time with contributions from community the app library will grow and pipelines can be built with ready to use apps.

For complex cases or specialized integrations, you can use any npm library to build your flow.

You can integrate into your stack with HTTP API and we can build SDKs for popular languages so it's just a function call to send the events.
It's definitely a case of, me and probably 1% of hiring managers are super opinionated and will be massively biased towards it, and the other 99% who aren't nerds will just think I used a nice template
Sure, but it’s going to be trippy for the jury.
This is other side of extreme. And these constants are widely accepted notation.
This seems like a really, really easy problem to fix.

It should be easy to check Copilot's output to make sure it's not copied verbatim from a GPL project. Colleges already have software that does this to detect plagiarism.

If it's a match, just ask GPT to refactor it. That's what humans do when they want to copy stuff they aren't allowed to copy, they paraphrase it or change the style while keeping the content.
Weapons are intentional, and ecosystems don’t do “intentional” on their own; you could even call this lack of agency a defining quality of a natural ecosystem.
The USPS is a terrible spam blocker.
How does it compare to Sourcegraph? What is the main differentiator?
For some of those scenarios, couldn’t concrete be abandoned altogether?

Wooden building work pretty well, though forestry has plenty of its own problems (see New Zealand and it’s series of slash disasters).
A construction crew completed a retrofit on Citicorp Center in NYC over a few months, and the project was kept secret for almost 20 years after its completion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citicorp_Center_engineering_cr...
It will absolutely get their attention and get your issue in front of a real person who will have the organizational power to fix it.

A cheaper way to do the same thing is to fedex a business letter written in formal english, citing dates and times you tried to resolve the situation and that your next step is to file a legal complaint.

It should be just as effective but it will save you the small claims filing fees.
As a counterpoint to this for science fiction, I recommend Denis Villeneuve's Arrival.
The drag and drop GUI designers used to work because most people were using screens that were approximately the same size and resolution for the most part back then. That is no longer the case today when there is pressure to support everything from a smart watch all the way up to a UHD 4K monitor or TV. Fixed layouts are also much more difficult to localize and translate to other languages than modern layout systems.
Fair comment. I did try to add tactical things someone could do in the short term to make it less "by the way you're screwed if you didn't do this", but I'll make sure to frame it more specifically in my next posts
There are so many ways for "impact" to go wrong during promotions and performance reviews.

I think my favorite were projects that just didn't have any metrics. Or that claimed to have metrics, but somehow they were never shared...
Where does OpenAI state that they only train ChatGPT-3.5 or GPT-4 on code from GitHub? The model for GitHub Copilot X clearly has a (human) language understanding that you can't get from source code (or source code comments), so they are trained on much more data than GitHub has and there is no reason to believe OpenAI would limit themselves to that.
Does any of this make a difference to the unemployed? I assure you, the unemployed in the US and norway have two very different experiences and I'd much rather be unemployed in a scandi country than in the US.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230506035236/http://www.travel...
Speaking of revenue, this type of infrastructure would require tolls to pay for the energy consumption.
the problem only came to me when i had multiple post requests queued up due my internet connection being up and down, and then only one of them having a valid token (as that one, regenerated the token and invalidated the requests after)

and yes, im doing along with https of course, to prevent cookie theft.

locking the cookie to the IP is/will be an option in user settings. decided to leave it as an option as for say mobile devices that could get very annoying if it was forced.
"it" = Datadog
CI/CD ended up being probably the easiest and most beneficial part of the process for me. Really doesn't take long to get a good system going.
Yes, it is good if you can avoid checks, and in most cases you can. But in practice it doesn't matter very much:
- Scaling is rarely the problem. I never experienced it myself. The same goes for the session.
- The complexity can be hidden behind a library. Iirc there is even a specification for this.
- You have other advantages because you usually use JWT with OAuth2.x/OIDC in the SSO context.
- You benefit from standardization.

CRL is probably not going to help you. At least I have no idea. But jti's blacklist will. Don't forget - you still have to maintain and distribute it, which probably won't lead to a better implementation.
Have you read the relevant terms of service? Do they require using some arbitration service instead?
>OpenBSD with the simple, obvious solution, that everyone else kinda overlooked

Systemd Timers have had this for a while.
It's of the same vibe as "electricity solves a maze" or "water solves a maze", imo
> every ill-educated whiner

an ill-educated whiner, and uncalled for.
Server is responding back with an 500 Internal Server Error.

HN hug of death maybe?
If you require all services to constantly be updated with the latest versions of libraries, you've built a distributed monolith, which is generally acknowledged as being far worse than both independent services and an actual monolith.
I have missed Google Code Search, which launched in 2006 and was discontinued in 2013. Similar to GitHub's code search, it supported searching by regex and filtering by language etc. - but obviously the amount of code to search through is orders of magnitude larger than it was 10-15 years ago. Still I wonder what took GitHub so long to build this - it's hardly a novel idea, and it seems like such an obvious power tool for programmers to have.
Don't Knock My Smock
Location: Greater Boston Area
Remote: Yes (highly preferred)
Technologies: Python (Pandas, Numpy, sklearn, PyTorch), GCP (Big Query, GCS, Pub/Sub, etc), Docker/Kubernetes, Terraform, NLP (HuggingFace)
Resume/CV:
LinkedIn:

Data Scientist/ML Engineer with 5 years of experience located in Greater Boston Area. Highly prefer fully remote roles but might be open to (limited hybrid). Extensive experience both training ML models and deploying ML/data infrastructure.
How is the previous revenue relevant? For a rational company, workforce is needed to increase revenue in one way or another. If the company is rational and wanted to increase their revenue, why would they decide to lay them off (and incur additional expenses)?
(I work on code search.) Yeah, sorry about that. We've heard this feedback a lot. There's two reasons why we haven't implemented this. First, content is shared between repositories which makes this harder than before, when it wasn't. Second, we rebuild the index weekly or even more frequently, so the proxy of "when was this added" that was used doesn't work any more. What we would like to use is "when was this blob added to this branch" but that's extremely expensive to retrieve from Git because Git trees don't record it.
What does an AR-15 do to a human body?
Twitter to Remove Inactive Accounts
> but I agree, this is not something that i've ever considered when filtering CVs.

As a proficient LaTeX user, this is the stupidest take I ever saw on resume tips. I mean, your skills and experience do not vary with the document system you used to generate your CV. Some hiring managers swear by MS Word templates, other hiring managers ask for Europass, others ask you to fill in a form and request a cover letter. It would be stupid to assess the suitability of any candidate on this sort of bullshit.
"Goodbyes are always hard, especially when I'm the one saying goodbye. Today effective immediately I Gavin Belson, Founder & CEO of Hooly, am forced to officially say goodbye....to the entire nucleus division." - Silicon Valley

If anyone, Patrick P. Gelsinger and all the executives who made bad strategic decisions should be fired and not the workers. But of course that wouldn't happen because in US workers have no power. It's like presiding as a judge over the case where you yourself are accused.

Unionize!
Your mischaracterization is blatant. I trust this clarification settles the matter.
This is an argument to simply not consider the date of death of an author at all.

For example, 70 years since the work was first published seems reasonable. Then most people's descendants will see some revenue from dad's work, and there won't be a sudden cliff date, assuming dad produced works all through his life.

An investor who buys the rights no longer has to consider the age and health status of the author while deciding how much the rights are worth.
Seriously? Isn't that an overly cynical worldview? I agree that having distribution information is strictly better than only the median, but in most cases only the median/mean is mentioned for the sake of brevity. People reading a article about writer pay don't want 10 numbers thrown at them for a single statistic.
don't the FBI and CIA fight all the time? I think the FBI is just jealous they're constrained (or at least suppose to be constrained) by the US constitution where the CIA gets to do whatever they want and play with the best toys.
This is a great comment, I definitely neglected the value this brings.
I honestly believe US Entrepreneurs want TikTok's word-of-mouth success with Facebook's profit margins. But they miss what makes TikTok good - what it connects users to.

Instagram, Snap, even YouTube have the video format down well enough - it's the community they can't just re-create (without changing how they do monetization). A vast majority of creators I follow on TT are on IG and YT, yet I'm never shown their videos. I am, however, shown about a billion ads and repeated videos for every novel video I see.
> By far the most important thing in anti aging that checks all boxes is excercise and getting nutrition right (no excess fat).

Do you mean "don't eat excess fat" or "don't have excess fat on your body"? It's not clear to me from the context.
I guess I am not a visionary because this makes zero sense to me. I guess anything react related receives points simply for existing
Give it another 30 years and they will "invent" Turbo Vision
> It’s not gross. It’s a simple solution to a simple and common cron problem

No, it's gross. By providing that facility in the wrong place it discourages implementing it in the right place to people who come at the problem from the cron perspective.

Wrap the command in a flock-running script. That script goes in the crontab entry. When you're inevitably debugging your cron-scheduled command - paydirt! The command serializes itself still while you're manually testing instead of shitting itself.
> Do you think a physicist would be less certain that OP is wrong, than how certain OP is that he is right?

This is not the correct application of the effect.

A physicist would have been sure about this particular case being wrong, but would likely be a lot more careful and concise about what he's talking about. Also a physicist is supposed to be more confident, as they are on the far right side of the curve.

Being at the bottom of that curve is reserved for folks like me who rely on common sense but cannot be certain outside of extremely basic cases like knowing that electrons are not leaving the USB en masse.
Its pretty clear to anyone that nothing provided even culminates in a first step towards a solution. Nothing about risk management, the communication minimizes risk threat, nothing about the fundamental limitations of computation or the decidability problem.

It regurgitates in circles, and communication is the conveying of meaning. This clearly isn't communication because it doesn't understand.

If you didn't know any better you'd let it control a train with tracks running right over a cliff, with you on it going at full speed and when you see it and ask about the threat it would say:

I understand the challenges and potential consequences of getting it wrong, and it is important to continue researching and refining this to address these concerns. <HAL?> The intention is to encourage an overall shift in mindset towards long-term thinking and resource preservation Dave. Considering these perspectives and having an open dialogue about them can help us collectively. <as you fall> I appreciate your valuable insights and the opportunity to engage in this discussion.
Is Apple M1/M2 low margin? Can intel profuce anything as good as M2?

No? Then they are under investing in R&D. It's been a while since M1 came out and intel CPUs still havent caught up.

They GPUs are lacking too. Apply has AI inference functionality in their chips and great ML software support.

You don't get to tell me that they have nowhwre to invest when they are losing on multiple fronts.

I am not even mentioning the fact that they should be finding foundamentally new opportunities ahead of their competitors.
Amazing! Absolutely love the alpha series too.

I only briefly had a Saturn and Virtua Cop series is still one of my most intense memories. A light gun game at home with graphics that looked like the arcade to my childhood eyes!

I wonder if kids these days will look back on the ps5 similarly hard to imagine!
>in the vast majority of cases isn't the reality of it.

Extraordinarily claims require extraordinary evidence, of which none is provided. Public actors do not have, among many other negative characteristics, enshittification incentives. Greed is a malignant cancer that ruins human lives if left untreated.
I know this is true but it stings to see this as someone who has unfortunately done a lot of job hopping. It all "made sense" at the time, and looking back I wonder what I should have done differently, but at this point I really don't want to job hop anymore. This is how I explain my story to hiring managers:

* Startup ABC: 3 years -> Quit for a job that allowed me to break into a niche.

* Company BigCo: 9 Months -> Got asked to return to ABC as a leader, related to niche. "Great opportunity", didn't have a record of job hopping at the time, took it!

* Startup ABC: (Another) 3 years -> Got tired of the grind and quit for a job at Startup XYZ. Seemed reasonable at the time.

* Startup XYZ: 3 Months -> Toxic work environment, quit for mental health reasons. Requires the most explaining, but I felt totally justified and have since been vindicated by semi-public info about the org.

* Company HugeCo: 6 Months -> Got an offer from Meta that represented a 2x increase in comp (plus prestige of Big Tech). Hard to say no.

* Meta: 1 year -> Saw the writing on the wall my team was going to get crushed in layoffs and opportunistically jumped while I could. Ended up being correct about my team's fate btw.

* Startup JKL -> Been here for 4 months with no plan of leaving.

So all in all, in the last 4 years I've had 4 jobs, the "danger zone" as the OP put it. I don't have any desire to change jobs again soon. How would you view my story? Would you see me as a serial job hopper? Someone who can't commit? Or someone who made a series of reasonable choices in isolation that resulted in a disjointed resume? Most of this took place between 2019-2022 when the job market was on fire, and I don't necessarily regret it (after all, my salary tripled during this time). But I know how it looks.
A team, yes. This was two people doing everything. Why would they fully use a design practice designed to scale people on a codebase?
> This allows you to run API migrations and data migrations independently. Which is crucial for any service that will last longer than 1 year.

I've felt nervous for years about going all-in with Django Rest Framework, and you've articulated exactly why.
While in undergrad I wrote a modular resume script that picked a set bullet points based on the tags I gave them, rendered those bullets into a LaTeX template, and then spat out the customized result with a PDF. With this I could quickly spin out slightly different resumes that showcase different tech stacks, emphasize/de-emphasize military service or defense contractor work, drop (or add) bullets that imply I was an older-than-usual grad, etc.

I still use the script out of habit, though I wouldn't write it now.
Preface, most predictions are worthless.

3 years ago would the author have predicted a chat bot that could understand and write language fluently? Ha. I doubt it.

My prediction, FWIW (not much): we are very close to AGI (for some definitions of AGI).
And this is why I use Oracle Apex lol
Evidence that the Neanderthals were the first seafarers?
> I want Erlang-style concurrency

OK, but you must want something besides that because...

> an ideal model (Erlang) but if that's not available

It is available. In Erlang. So if that's what you want, why are you not just using Erlang? Why even bother with the contingency of "if that's available"? Why are we having this discussion at all?

This is the reason that Erlang-style concurrency is not available off-the-shelf in Lisp. There's no market for it. The people who really want Erlang-style concurrency just use Erlang. No language will ever do Erlang-style concurrency better than Erlang. Erlang-style concurrency is Erlang's defining feature. The whole point of Erlang is to do Erlang-style concurrency. You can't do better than Erlang at "Erlang-style concurrency" by definition.

The point of Lisp is not do X-style-anything better than X. The main benefit of Lisp is that it allows you to explore a much larger space of possible solutions in a much shorter time, which is a big win when you don't know what you want, which, I submit, is most of the time.
Thanks for the feedback - could you give any feedback for next time? I'm fairly new to writing.

(And yes I won't quit my day job!)
It went from an Internet of amateurs (those with an actual love for what they are talking about) to professionals (which are very slick, but the money is always there).

You can still find great content in videos and music from amateurs, but the professionals "outshout" most of them; and the best amateurs end up getting sucked into being professionals. Once your livelihood is on the line, things change.
If I compare this to Reddit, there are subreddits for different topics with people of different mindset frequenting those subreddits.

That at least offers you a space to discuss something which might not be popular with most readers.

With HN you if your comment is completely against the thinking of a certain demographic ( identical people as you put it), it's downvoted heavily.
No chance for constructive comments or discussion like on subreddits.
Sure, they want a safe secure home, and part of that is smart home features. I don't know why you're really downplaying it here, it's not as if smart home features are exclusive to the "dumb" things like checking HVAC over the internet.

You can look up plenty of statistics regarding smart homes, and every one of them shows growth, and increase of demand. Especially considering smart homes cost more, this isn't a limitation, as most smart home packages are an additional cost to their rent/purchase. Going back to Mattamy, this is an additional monthly subscription.

Again, I don't understand your attempt to downplay this. It seems narrative driven rather than objective. You want to believe something is true, so you come up with ideas like landlords being enough of a big market to double smart home industry in 3 years.
> On one hand Twitter was known to have FBI and CIA working inside them.

{{By whom}}

An ex-employee of the FBI or the CIA isn't the FBI or the CIA. Are you still working for your previous employer?
The WGA has terrible timing with their strikes. Last one was in 2008. This one is now on the heels of another banking crisis and chatgpt which has the ability to destroy any writing gigs.

I feel for my friends in the industry but AI is going to wreck workers in entertainment.
Yeah, it's as if this person read the first paragraph and assumed the system was the exact same one as in the screencap.

Anyone who read the article would see they're different in all but acronyms.
KeePassDX on Android
The difference is the difference between "it may be fake" and "it is fake". "May" being the key word that makes it a meaningless observation instead of a defense. If someone wants to defend themselves against video evidence, they need to say that it's fake, and create reasonable doubt about its veracity. You don't do that with "maybe" or "could be".

> Why should it be the defendants who have to pay for the expert instead of the plaintiffs?

TL;DR: that's how our legal system works in the US, for better or worse.

EDIT: You probably don't have to attack the video as a deepfake directly, either. "That's not me, I wasn't at X, I was at Y, and here are receipts and witnesses" are highly likely to work too. Basically, an alibi.