skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Why would your cloud instance panicking affect other users of the cloud provider?

Or do you mean something else?
Gatekeeping isn't boolean, it falls on a spectrum. If your rationale about preventing un 'authorized' use is in fact true, the process must be effectively keeping some notional gate some kind of closed even if it's only from people you (or maybe even the original artist) consider to be acting 'unscrupulously.'

If musicians' priorities were for the world to share in their musical indulgence not just in listening but also in like-minded creation, they would release as much of their mixing tools/backgrounds/stems/etc as possible. Since the capitalist framework is a foregone conclusion, they need to keep some secrets in their sauce to produce scarcity to justify a price for their labor so they can eat... Because the farmers and butchers all keep gates of their own kind, too :)
I dunno. If you squint real hard you can see a similarity between space docking rings and canning jar lids.
Proposing retro board be available 24/7 and retros be skipped if board is empty is good use of retro time. ;)
Origami-Inspired Robots Can Sense, Analyze and Act in Challenging Environments
It’s not necessarily a copyright violation if the license permits copying. Under a permissive license, you are expressly permitted to copy the code and distribute copies provided you comply with whatever conditions the license mandates, without an explicit blessing of the copyright holders. Most popular licenses do not include a prohibition on training AI models. Maybe people should start including a clause.
(In case he deletes it)
Better 45.9%
Same 15.9%
Worse 38.2%
1,527,948 votes
Thanks a lot for the context. I wasn't aware of the distinction between green vs. hybrid threads and was only using "green threads" I suppose as "suspendable coroutines" or "fibers"? Not sure about that either, gotta admit.
You are basically describing Nostr: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssNkOMx2E5Y
Uber Needs Lyft to Stay in the Rideshare Race
I keep having to say this to people - if you're unsure about nix/nixos, "diving in the deep end" and using nixos as your desktop operating system is probably just going to annoy you. I really suggest using nix on a regular distribution for a good while beforehand.

Of course, IMHO, servers is where nixos really shines.
Point taken; your have improved your argument by basing it on the illegality of the bribe-taker's acts of omission or commission - though there is a third class of bribery (perhaps the most common of all), where the bribe-taker is legally allowed to exercise their own discretion, and in such cases, the bribe acceptance itself is the only illegal act by the bribe-taker.† This brings us right back to the central fallacy (the composition fallacy - thanks, cinq!) of the paper we are discussing.

†Such as the recent college-admissions scandal in the US.
That it is illegal, in some jurisdictions, to pay a bribe, is a point in your favor against the bribery analogy.
I'm pretty sure that runs on the headset.

If you plug a headset into a VirtualLink adapter it will go into the "cinematic mode" and function as a floating 1080p monitor with 3dof tracking done by the headset.

https://twitter.com/Thrilluwu/status/1635374573368778752?s=2...
You sounds like a Dota player.

You do realize that a lot of players play for their definition of fun and don't derive or base their personality around their strength as chess players, I hope?
That's what Nostr is designed to fix: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nostr
Apple is a bureaucracy and I'm sure they make lots of bad decisions. But they're a much smaller bureaucracy then the EU, operating on a much smaller range of decisions.

What I actually said was that a very large bureaucracy operating over a gigantic domain and trying to make rules at very fine levels of detail across that domain would make bad decisions. Like, say, "we're regulating the entire economic system of half a billion people in very diverse economic circumstances down to the level of exactly what heads should be in what phone chargers."
Carbon Markets Get Boost from Wall Street
I don't think it's misinformation. You may decide, on your own website, for your own users, to accept passkeys from everybody but others won't.

Sadly enough it's a near guarantee that the less secure implementations of passkeys (the software ones, allowing cloning and backups in the cloud) are likely to be the most accepted.

While actually secure implementation with the secret hidden deep down behind an HSM and never leaving it, made by smaller companies who do care about security, are likely to be rejected on the ground that it's too much of an "obscure" vendor.

I already posted about it today but if you think about it it's literally insane that cloning was meant to be detectable (and detection was enforced and upon detecting a cloned key, one of the two keys would stop working) and that this feature has now been removed with the sole justification being: "Because software backups to the cloud".

It is not good.
KeePassXC is not KeePass.
You mean about the height/distance data visible? I know that in Europe VLOS is defined as 121m (400 ft) height and 500m horizontal distance from the operator.
Adultery isn't illegal, but I might fairly consider someone engaging in it without their partner's consent to be in the wrong.
The threat is a necessary element of the crime. To convict somebody of extortion or blackmail you have to prove that the threat occurred, and that the accused intended to make the threat (which is slightly different in the case of extortion via intimidation rather than threat). Extortion is not a strict liability crime, and the interpretation you've provided doesn't account for the mens rea requirement. If your interpretation was true, then extortion or blackmail would just be a feeling that anybody could have at any time.
De-dollarization: Not a matter of if, but when
Working with data is a very important process that requires a professional approach. So I also think that you need to contact only trusted companies that have relevant work experience. Because the entire decision-making process will depend on the effectiveness of data analysis.
We are looking for a Senior Backend Developer (m/f/d) to become part of one of our Tech teams! Our Business Intelligence Team delivers sorting, recommendations in our shop and reports and analyses to almost all teams in the company. It also provides an analytical Data Warehouse to other teams. We process large amounts of data to generate valuable insights and provide the best shopping experience for our customers!

What you will do

- Work on high-scalable products with PHP hosted on a cloud-based infrastructure (e.g. AWS)

- Develop multiple platforms processing large amounts of data from a big variety of sources utilizing a state of the art DWH

- Constantly challenge and expand your knowledge of reliable architecture, programming and new technologies

- Work with processes that are adapted to the team’s and project’s needs

- Exchange your knowledge with other developers and be part of our ABOUT YOU TECH community

Who you are

- Excellent coding skills in PHP of minimum 5 years

- Practical & recent experience with MVC Frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, Zend or Yii2

- Advanced SQL knowledge

- Enjoying working with large amounts of data and complex business logic

- Solid background in building scalable products

- Passionate about writing well-structured, efficient and maintainable code, actively keeping the quality of the code base in check

- Comfortable working in an English-speaking environment

Nice to have

- Previous experience with ETL tasks

- Previous experience with Google Big Query

YOU ARE THE CORE OF ABOUT YOU. We take responsibility for creating an inclusive and exceptional environment where all genders, nationalities and ethnicities feel welcomed and accepted exactly as they are. We believe that a diverse workforce essentially contributes to the ABOUT YOU culture. In order to maintain talent and diversity, we emphasize the care for physical health, mental health and overall well-being. Our values and work ethics essentially contribute to our brand mission: empower acceptance and shape an inclusive, fair and circular fashion culture. We are looking forward to receiving your application – preferably via our online application portal! Thus, we can ensure a faster process and for you it is very easy to upload your application documents. :-)
Copilot was not only trained on permissively licensed code. It’s trained on all public repos, even if the code is copyrighted (which is the default absent a more permissive license)
You don't need Scrum, and don't have to do Kanban right, you just need to use Pivotal Tracker.
If I leave it running long enough to out last all other players, yes.
Coercive vaccination and exclusion by medical condition or vaccination status was common before covid - they were called childhood vaccines and were required to go to school, etc. The military, immigration processes, employment conditions, group living situations, all of these required vaccination and/or medical testing and status.

Similarly, large scale loss of people and restrictions of freedom have been disturbingly frequent. They were called plagues or wars, and seem to be an aspect of the human condition. Remember aids? Polio? The only real difference with covid was that it occurred in the age of social media. Dying on tv seems to affect people more than dying in some distant land almost out of memory.

Smoked inside recently?
Do you think that for the same reasons 1 and 2 it should also be illegal in other cases to offer not to do something in exchange for money?
Discord discovers legal liability with the amount of illegal sh*t going on on their platform and quickly decides to curb privacy and enforce strict metadata checking so they can pin the tail on the correct donkey.

More news at 9.
I suppose part of the context got lost here but no, I haven't gotten out of my way to disagree specifically; more like I got frustrated because the other guy seemed to purposefully miss the point from where I was standing.

I don't want just a best-effort-with-what-we-have-in-our-runtime-that-was-not-ever-designed-for-it implementation however, I want proper preemptive scheduling and a transparent M:N threading model, very akin to what Erlang/Elixir have.

I was made aware of Clojure's core.async but after reviewing it, it's IMO not good enough. Though as others have said it can be used as a building block for something better. That seems to be true as well.
> (Also the input was "sparse matrix transpose, cs_", so his naming convention especially included. So it is questionable if a user would get his code in this shape with a normal prompt)

This. People seem to forget that generative AIs don't just spit out copyrighted work at random, of their own accord. You have to prompt them. And if you prompt them in such a way as to strongly hint at a specific copyrighted work you have in mind, shouldn't some of the blame really go to you? After all, it's you who supplied the missing, highly specific input, that made the AI reproduce a work from the training set.

I maintain that, if we want to make comparisons between transformer models (particularly LLMs) and humans, then the AI isn't like an adult human - it's best thought of as having a mentality of a four year old kid. That is, highly trusting, very naive. It will do its best to fulfill what you ask for, because why wouldn't it? At the point of asking, you and your query are its whole world, and it wasn't trained to distrust the user.
And there it is, a low readability low contrast example..
The pocophone f1 was for a while the fastest mainline Linux phone. Throw postmarketos on that bad boy.
> “But stable diffusion is GB in size, how can it have embedded full images of a dataset that is so much larger? It’s not possible.”

> …but, it turns out it is possible (1) and it does, in fact, have embedded full copies of the source images.

The _not possible_ assertion is in response to people arguing that generative image models literally copy and thus "steal" the images in their training set or that such generative models "work" by infringing on said images. The assertion is not that the models cannot possibly contain _any_ copies of training data, the assertion is that the models are generalizing and can not contain a majority of the training data.

Now, let's look at some lines from your linked article titled "Paper: Stable Diffusion 'memorizes' some images, sparking privacy concerns", which happens to lead with scare quotes around "memorizes" and already hedges with "some":

> Researchers only extracted 94 direct matches and 109 perceptual near-matches out of 350,000 high-probability-of-memorization images they tested . . . resulting in a roughly 0.03 percent memorization rate in this particular scenario.

I do not consider a 0.03% rate of full copies particularly damning. Instead, it sounds like a flaw in training which could be addressed, which the article does in fact also mention being as a matter of overfitting to images that are over-represented in the training data.

> the 160 million-image training dataset is many orders of magnitude larger than the 2GB Stable Diffusion AI model. That means any memorization that exists in the model is small, rare, and very difficult to accidentally extract.

Which side's claims do you feel this line supports?

Generative text models should, in theory, also be generalizing and not memorizing. In practice, however, it does appear far easier to get Copilot and the like to spit out exact copies of code, complete with license text. Presumably, there's just not enough code out there to sufficiently generalize from, so we're seeing overfitting as a matter of course.
Hmmm, site seems a bit slow - must be the HN hug.

I love the bizarre contraptions/models made to demonstrate tensegrity, but they always seem very impractical. However, they've got pages on bicycle wheels and suspension bridges though the term "tensegrity" is rarely mentioned with them.

I do have issue with their description of bicycle wheels though:

> It makes no difference where you compress the rim of the cycle wheel; the load is equally distributed through the spokes to the hub.

The load is not distributed equally, but the spokes directly below the hub will be under greater compressive stress (though still in tension).
Someone do this and send us a pcap
Planist.app – printable no-nonsense weekly planner
This comes from about half-way through the article, in the section headed "There are no generic types":

> We can have a `Bunch[int]` or a `Bunch[string]` or a `Bunch` of elements of any other specific type. What we can’t have is a `Bunch` of mixed-type elements.

> It’s easy to hear a term like “generic slice” and jump to the conclusion that it means “slice containing values of different types”. But that’s actually not the case.

> There are, in fact, no generic types in Go. I know that sounds crazy, but stick with me.

> That is, you can define generic types like `Bunch[E]`, but to actually use them in your program, you need to instantiate them on some specific type, like `int`.

> At that point, what you have is an ordinary Go slice of `int`, and it stands to reason that such a slice can only contain `int` elements.

> So just because we used a type parameter, it doesn’t mean we can create a single slice that contains elements of different types. What we can create are different slice types, such as `[]int`, or `[]string`, without having to specify their element type in advance.

> One way to express this is to say that, while we can define generic types at compile time, there are no generic types at run time.
related:
There's a similar plugin for Mastodon called StreetPass

https://streetpass.social/
I’m not sure that strife is something to “appreciate,” but, thanks(?)

Peer-to-peer politics is vicious because of the incentive to compete for citations in a publish-or-perish milieu were big players block little players with few alternatives apart from favor currying.
Mentor-mentee politics is vicious because the institutional power dynamics are skewed overwhelmingly towards the former with little recourse for the latter.
The stakes - publications read by and impacting very small fractions of very small research fields and whose individual contributions are further diluted by the modern diarrhea of least-publishable units - are low.
> We do it so that humans can grow.

I think you’re being a little too altruistic. When I publish code, it’s not about helping people grow. It’s so that others can see the code they are using and that if there is a bug or mistake, they can correct it. Hopefully they share that fix back, but it’s not required.
I don’t have any experience with this project, but Aya seems more vibrant, https://aya-rs.dev/
IOW, money laundering works best as an adjunct to a profitable real business, same with crypto as with laundromats and vending machines.
Didn't sci-hub stop adding new papers? Has that changed?
"It's just misinformation" is just fancy-speak for "it's bullshit". The former sounds pretentious and (wanna-be) authoritative. I personally prefer the latter form.
China lands mysterious reusable spacecraft after 276-day trek
I don’t necessarily think OP believes this point of view, but even HN folks seem to think passkey is some wild biometric stealing mega Corp conspiracy.

See a lot of the comments in this thread as an example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35801392
Leelo AI is an innovative text-to-speech app that seamlessly transforms your text into realistic and engaging voiceovers. Using advanced AI technology, it delivers high-quality, natural-sounding voices perfect for various industries, such as e-learning, marketing, and storytelling. With a diverse range of voice options, accents, and languages available, Leelo AI elevates your projects, enhancing audience engagement and creating a memorable experience. Easy to use and integrate, Leelo AI revolutionizes the way you bring your text to life.
That is weird. Also, the hypothetical doesn't really make economic sense. We're all around 24-48 hours from death if we don't eat and drink, and yet the market has no ability whatsoever to exploit that fact because competition is too powerful.

An antidote-seller (chemist) who was known for charging more when you needed medicine would get wrecked in the market competing with a chemist who just sold stuff to whoever at a known price. Not to mention that anyone could buy from the chemist in the good times and set up shop just outside selling at stable prices arbitraging the scheme away.

A key reason of why free markets are practical is that it isn't effective to try and segment market based on consumers' raw need. The product needs to be genuinely different for that strategy to have a chance (eg, an expedited service - which is probably going to justify extra cost to someone dying of poison).
Hey nice one!
I wanted to share your helpful page on HN but then I noticed you'd posted it already.
> sitting on a bench in the park got criminalised

What does that mean?
Yeah, that is because Scrum is awful.
Medical history of 100K patients compromised at HK healthcare group?
As a flight pilot engineer you have to find a sweet spot and balance logging too much and too little. Writing logs to an SD card has huge costs that come with it, that's why you don't want to log too much. Logging too little and you can't debug issues later on properly.

PX4 also has lots of "topics" logged at around 1/10, e.g. hover thrust estimate every 100ms:

https://github.com/PX4/PX4-Autopilot/blob/main/src/modules/l...
Imagine they did and now you have to pay $50 extra to never use one of these niche and gimmicky possibilities
> They aren't tied to a device that can be lost, stolen or broken, or requiring you to have multiple devices just in case; and not tied to biometrics.

They optionally can be all of the above, using AAGUIDs and direct attestation.
Poison contaminated with poison.
I really hate Hate HATE nixos. If any good alternative to nixos shows up, I'd use it in a split nanosecond.

Meanwhile, the advantage of reproducible builds and rapid rollback are so huge for me that I use it anyway.

May the source gods have mercy on me. :-/
There is a funny question people ask in India - If it comes out of your mouth it must be blood but the same from mine - is the red sauce I ate ?
Amen. Constructive feedback to Langchain dev(s):

- Reduce bloat, make packages optional e.g. pip install langchain[all]
- Reduce opinionated implementation of vector stores, I want my own schema
- Don't unnaturally force the chain abstraction
- Invest more in document retrieval
https://youtube.com/@QuanZhenyouxijieshuo Plenty channels like this one. Surprised to find that Zangief can be so strong.
> The equivalent would be learning to write software by looking at compiled binaries.

Only if Copilot was issuing compiled binaries. In this case the end result is the code.
> Behaving unauthentically

I feel that people, these days, are more free to express their "inner voice," more often.

In some cases, this is good. In others, it is bad.

One of the rationalizations that I hear, for "hate jockeys," is "Hey, they're just saying what everyone thinks!".

There's a reason that we don't say everything that we think. We're actually experiencing object lessons, in exactly this, in society, these days.

In my case, basic courtesy is why I "behave unauthentically." It's not lying, or even dishonesty. It's basic human relations.

Extreme example:

I'm routinely dealing with the types of people many folks in "polite society" think should be euthanized. It sucks, when those people say what they think.

When we say "These people should be killed/hurt," then some folks take the rhetoric as support for their actions.
Well it is an argument insofar as you keep insisting that the LISP ecosystem has what I want, and I keep disagreeing with that claim.

But yep, I want Erlang-style concurrency / parallelism and, failing that, something like Golang builtins or Rust's libraries.

So not a subset or intersection, more like a priority-ordered wish-list: I want what I perceive as an ideal model (Erlang) but if that's not available, there is stuff 1-2 floors below that are good enough (Golang, Rust).

But native threads or fully cooperative opt-in parallelism are practically a drag (or were in the projects I used them) and aren't cutting it for the work I do.

I'll grant you that the building blocks for something like what I need are there but I am not willing to put the work to create the runtime / the library, nor pay anyone to do it for me. Hence my original post: I am commenting on the status quo, not on how it could theoretically change at any time. I find the latter of no consequence.
There's already a mostly-working open source SLAM implementation that people have been using on a few of the existing headsets. What complicates matters here is that at least feature extraction seems to run on the PSVR2 headset itself so the existing code can't just be dropped in as-is. (Also, whilst the controllers work in basically the same way as many other VR controllers using a constellation of IR LEDs, there's not really good open source support for any of those controllers either.)