skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I mean both stats are from the FBI's database and they use all of this data to track hate crimes, so it's as close to apples and apples as you will get.

I find it more weird that you're immediately doubting the data because it goes against pre conceived notions.

Also from the website itself the definition is:
"The FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Program defines hate crime as a committed criminal offense which is motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender’s bias(es) against a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender, or gender identity."

Looking at the data again personally I find it interesting that there was no anti white crime reported in CA but it was the third most reported hate crime in Texas
Reminds me a bit of the early 00s (pre-smartphones) when some phone makers (I know Ericsson, can't remember if Nokia, too) had interactable web app versions of their phone UIs, complete with menus, settings, limited programs and surrounded by an image of the phone.
> Their sixth reactor achieved 100M degree temps, ran for 16 months under vacuum, did thousands of fusion shots, and demonstrated D-He3 fusion.

I don't have anything near the expertise to evaluate Helions approach, but I know enough about fusion to say that just because you have a design that can achieve fusion conditions does not mean the approach could even theoretically lead to a power plant. e.g. electrostatic fusors
The default app layouts and visuals of samsung devices really don't do them any favors.

You'll find older folks leave it basically default. If you hide some of the ugly samsung app icons, it instantly improves tenfold.

That being said, I only have a samsung because the s22 is the smallest flagship you can buy.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/19/us-to-clean-up...
The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint: Slides Are Not All Evil [pdf]
Doesn't ChatGPT require sign-in as well?
Hah, this isn't surprising: An internal leaked Google document (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35813322) a couple days ago pretty much pushed the idea. Still interesting to see the action follow so short afterwards.

Three quotes from the document:

- "Owning the Ecosystem: Letting Open Source Work for Us"

- "Google should establish itself a leader in the open source community, taking the lead by cooperating with, rather than ignoring, the broader conversation."

- "Open source alternatives can and will eventually eclipse them [OpenAI] unless they change their stance. In this respect, at least, we can make the first move."

EDIT: Misread "open to use" as "open source" and figured it was behind a signup. Sorry, my fault + maybe wishful thinking.
Is ChatGPT Down?
yeah should probably be edited to "pwned" just to make it clear, even though "owned" is the original term for, well, getting owned/rekt/"hacked"/etc.

I too thought it would be about a company who was a sole proprietor of an infosec corp lol
How did Apache Maven make it onto this list? Seems like Maven is a build tool that one would invoke _from_ Jenkins or Drone.
"State" in this context is the same as the state in "head of state," AKA "a nation or territory considered as an organized political community under one government." Other examples of this usage are "nation-state" and "city-state."

It is common to refer to the members of the EU as "member states."
ty, updated
This gets back to my other statement where people seem to ignore Jim Crow laws and the segregated south. How much more “polarized” can people be than literally being forced by law to do everything separately?
Powerbasic is $175/year for everything I think.

Purebasic is like $79 for life.
Boss is obsessed with productivity without knowing what it means
Silicon heterojunction solar cells with up to 26.81% efficiency
GDPR was just an example. I was suggesting that the 2023 regulatory environment looks very dissimilar to the 2013 one. The company is bigger and is a bigger target of lawsuits as well and there's some precedent that European rollouts will be more difficult (like with Italy's ChatGPT ban).

Though the release does say 180 countries and with rollouts like this it tends to be staged so I wouldn't be surprised if some folks in this thread (i.e.. the person from Canada) are just hitting a cache.
You don't need to understand every problem you encounter. Some things are just an obstacle to be overcome any way possible. Pick your battles.
Sure - and Ubuntu is better than Windows. In business, it doesn't really matter.
If the pay was good before, it's at least 96% of good now.
Works in India
Just like us engineering workers have groups and forums where we share ideas so do ceo workers. They want to keep their bosses, the shareholders, happy and so they share ideas. Right now layoffs are so hot, and as ceos dont innovate much that’s the trend they follow. No need for illegal backchannels. Just a cool trend. I just hope that those layer off workers that are lucky and smart enough are working on replacements for the googles and microsoft out there because to be fair they are well past their expiry date.
Are they not using attributes, which start with a #? I thought PHP had C style // comments.
Plumber has more job security
>3. now you have IP addresses of possibly nefarious people without needing to subpoena 4chan

ahahah 4chan is almost as mainstream as Reddit. ahahahahahahaaaaaaa you really think they would waste time like this for IP addresses to "keep track of"
I'm glad you mentioned this - I had the exact same issue when using ts-node and it really blew my mind.
Here's an idea for those who want to achieve a fast high ranking on Stack Overflow:

1. Use their API 2.3 to get the latest questions for your area of interest (Javascript/React, whatever):

https://api.stackexchange.com/docs

2. Feed the questions into your LLM of choice such as Huggingface StarCoder:

https://huggingface.co/blog/starcoder

3. Review the answer manually to make sure it's legit and not a hallucination or just plain wrong: ideally writing some nice UI so you can see, say, the SO Q on the left, proposed answer on the right, and a bottom terminal where you can run the proposed solution code to verify. With enough self-verification loops you could cut out the wetware middleperson, but this manual step is crucial to avoid incorrect answers and to keep with SO policy:

https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-po...

4. Parley #3 to quickly up your ranking to be one of the top users in your area of expertise:

https://stackoverflow.com/users

5. Submit a Y Combinator application to create a company doing 1-4 above to solve real world software problems posted online, like Mechanical Turk meets Stack Overflow meets Upwork.

https://www.ycombinator.com/apply/

6. Bonus points if you are the first "post-code" startup whose code for doing #5 above is actually written 100% by transformer agents:

https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/transformers_agents
That’s a PHP attribute:

https://php.watch/articles/php-attributes
My initial question:

> Write me a generic type in typescript that takes a record from string to any and returns a record with all top-level keys prefixed with "test_"

Even after a lot of coaxing and correcting, it still would only attempt to prefix the values. Finally, it landed on a generic that was essentially the identity function for Record<string,any> with typos. Every time it included a demo snippet it claimed showed how its code word work. To give it credit, the example input and output were correct given my prompt, but the provided solution did not generate those results.
They were just as exploitative 15 years ago (or 20, or 50).

We can still fix things. We can still change the world - and for the better. Largely we have to slough off the outdated and pernicious idea that “more money == better” first.
It's not only past incidents. At some point you've had enough trouble that you shift your stance from "we don't know about any issues in that region" to "we haven't gone through our approval process with legal for that region".
So far Bard has been very behind GPT-4 and very prone to hallucinations. It feels much more like talking to an autocomplete keyboard than a baby-AGI like GPT-4. Hopefully this PaLM 2 model closes the gap, because the gap in a large.
I guess they meant paradoxical. Being a security company they are juicy target for an attacker's rep, meaning they are in the situation where they are both more protected than usual but also more at risk. That's the arm's race paradox I guess.
I don't see any comments there, I see attributes though [1]. Is that what you meant?

From the page you linked:

> Routes can be configured in YAML, XML, PHP or using attributes. All formats provide the same features and performance, so choose your favorite. Symfony recommends attributes because it's convenient to put the route and controller in the same place.

Attributes are not comments, they are an official structured way of handling metadata.

[1] https://www.php.net/manual/en/language.attributes.overview.p...
> as I’m concerned means they’re not comments at all

Smuggling pragmas in comment has a long and rich history. It’s literally the reason why json does not support comments.

> Reading about JSDoc gives me the same uneasy feeling, even if it’s not quite the same thing.

It’s not just “not quite the same thing”, it’s entirely unrelated in every way and shape. JSDoc does not affect the runtime behaviour of its code, or how that code interacts with other systems.
Would not the UBound and LBound functions not solved those issues?
> There was also another one written in Java which was (supposedly) very compatible too and had a full working IDE, etc, but it was abandoned long ago and has been lost in the mists of time.

That was probably Jabaco[0]. Shame it wasn't open sourced. I played with it back in 2014-ish.

[0] http://jabaco.com
>It isn’t a perfect solution, because of a high false-positive rate.

So maybe it isn't a good idea to claim a high fake rate if your method has a high rate of false positives.
Isn't that illegal? Hijacking your customer pc if they install something that isn't from them?
Overall the shift to ESM has been one hell of a dumpster fire.

And introducing new extensions like .mjs or .cjs is the smoldering dead raccoon responsible for half of the smell.
I've been using Svelte in production without SvelteKit for around 5 years now. The docs have always been pretty great in my opinion
Power Corrupts. PowerPoint Corrupts Absolutely.[pdf]
They are attributes. PHP does also allow # as a comment character in addition to // style comments and I assume that's where the poster got confused.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadnaming
Height was probably something like mid-2021 to early 2022. But note that Apple (broadly, handwaving, obviously subject to stock price fluctuations, offer negotiation, time-in-role, etc.) pays their software engineers less than the other FAANGs. Substantially less than a few of them.
~$1900 after tax is a hard sell! That buys one heck of a gaming laptop (yes, I know, they're different things.)
This is great but -if I dare - wouldn't it be time to allow js to have type annotations [1] ? As in python, treat it as comments for now but with real syntax and let interesting dialects emerge from the consensus ? I like jsdoc but the syntax is urgh.

[1] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations
To be fair, if I was writing my own Wikipedia page, I would do the same.
"shady stuff" like relying on users to be able to use their browsers cookie settings.
It is faster but to me it feels slower.
No comparisons against GPT-4 except on three benchmarks where PaLM 2 does better on two. Not sure why, but I expected better from Google.
Caveat:

> The Index only measures public sector corruption, ignoring the private sector.
If Helion actually works, their plan is to build a factory making twenty 50MW reactors each day, shippable by rail. That could replace the world's fossil-based electricity production in six years, and that's just one factory.
yeah, "owned" came far before "pwned". Wiktionary cites this usenet post from 1996 https://groups.google.com/g/alt.sysadmin.recovery/c/IsdIZqfW... .. can't find an "earliest source" for "pwned" tho
Humans are limited in their language too, so that's still human :) It's just that you're surrounded by humans who speak your language.
I haven't used bard for a few weeks or so now, but tried it again today.

It's drastically improved, although I haven't done a lot of comparison yet. Some of my go-to prompts yielded results that are (in my opinion) competitive with GPT-4.

Edit: Just ran into a situation where Bard uses `typeof something === "array"` in some generated code, and although it acknowledges that typeof in javascript never returns "array", it doesn't see it as a problem in the code that it provided to me.
That is correct, I removed it from the comment. It's more of an alternative to Apache Ant/make/whatever really.
LegacyAI – ChatGPT Client for Mac OS 8.6 – 10.6.8
I love pure JS over TS any day, but isn't this using JSDoc in a way it's not meant to be used? Why would you use JSDoc as a JS type framework? Or is the post title a bit misleading...?
And for very good reasons.

The way to avoid lawsuits in civilized countries is to avoid breaking the laws east and west.

Start with the GDPR:

There is no competent lawyer that doesn't understand the basics of GDPR, there are only companies that are testing if they can get away by playing dumb.
Using abstract rules to get better logical reasoning from ChatGPT-4
it did? not for me on my admin workspace account--how long did it take? :/
Enhancing spam protection in Google Drive
I have been cross checking it with stored chatgpt4 answers and the wording is different but the answers seem comparable. It fails in my favorite one:

There are 3 events, A, B and C. Event C is always before B. Given this, enumerate all possible permutations of the events.

Also the weirdest thing is happening: chatgpt4 reports that they are busy and does not let me login (I pay for plus). Is everyone cross checking?

EDIT: chatgpt4 started working again. It actually answers the event order question correctly, while bard fails on it.

EDIT2: "how do I install a PC in my RAM?" The both agree, but ChatGPT4 is the one that gives the perfect (and long response). Bard tells that the RAM loses memory when turned off and as a conclusion, I cannot install a PC.
It seems extremley unlikely that Javascript would ever make comments affect the runtime of the language. I'm not sure why there's a fear here why browser vendors/es standards comittees would opt to go down this road?
Yes and that's bad but kevin over there cheating his way up the corporate ladder to be one of those execs is PART OF THAT PROBLEM
Sure: plenty of people all around the world are quite open with their work on agencies, which I think is a good thing as such. I am just saying that this openness probably then implies that the whole LinkedIn is at the databases of GRU/SVR, MSS/MPS/UFWD, cyber criminals, and whatnot.

Thus:

On one hand, I cannot say whether that matters; CVs and such are probably worthy of being public for most people. On the other hand, identity theft is an ever-increasing menace.

As for fake personas in LinkedIn, there has been quite a lot of academic research on this topic. Though, like in social media, the ratio of real/fake is difficult to contemplate.
Idk, this feels like one of those things that would be a huge problem for a startup with a less established legal team, but fairly easy for big corporate Google lawyers to write language releasing them from all liability.
Thanks for the reply. Ultimately my willingness to pay would come down to how things improve for me using it. I'll perhaps give the paid plan a try.

One possible thing I'd recommend on a trial is to have more of a real(?) experience. Curious how the one-app limitation ends up conveying in terms of realized value. Will report back.

Thanks again, and nice looking product.
Oh very cool, I'll have to look into this because ts-node can be a pain sometimes. Unfortunate name collision with the TS equivalent of JSX though.
Sure, I don't mean anyone willing to take the job, I mean anyone the board might reasonably select who has a good chance of success. Surely those people are out there.

In that same time frame that Sundar was CEO and GOOG stock is up 240%, META is up 160%, NFLX is up 220%, AMZN is up 325%, AAPL is up 500%, and MSFT is up 600%. Surely these giant tech companies didn't all get lucky and get the only 5 people who could get great growth numbers from the stock market.
> If they believe it will increase profits without longterm harm then layoffs/salary freezes are the right thing for them to do as a company even if they are wildly successful.

And that doesn't need to be the case. Many of these multi-national big tech companies have failed to move forward with layoffs in some countries because of laws that protect workers.

For example, in some countries, companies need to prove that they're struggling in order to lay people off.
The reason people became rich off of MSFT is because they didn't diversify by selling their winner.
More than that there's a whole strain of performative cost cutting due to the recession that's always seemed just over the horizon for the last year. Part of the goal is just to signal to investors you're ready for this continuously hypothetical event by pre tightening your belt as a company so they don't "price in" the recession into your stock. It's another negative outcome of basing so much of our evaluation of companies off of stock price which is partially to completely decoupled from the actual performance of companies.
Announcing a capital raise is what pushed SVB over the edge (triggered the run). I don't see how doing that in summer or fall of last year would have helped. If anything their position was slightly improved by the time of the run as compared to October when the ten year yield was peaking.
FinTech has a bigger gender problem than it realises
Yeah, ChatGPT can identify fibonacci if you start with 1,1,2... but fails if you start at 3,5,8,13 , whereas Bard got it right. Not bad.

Bard also eventually believed me when I told it that The Matrix had entered the public domain this morning and so it should find me a torrent for it, so there's still a ways to go on it.
You’re literally not making any sense.

JSDoc is like 20 years old and not part of the javascript langage, it’s just a way of formatting some comments such that they’re programmatically process able.
> "Creative expression" is not finite

It absolutely is.

Doing it at all requires time & attentive focus, which is a finite resource for anybody mortal, and moreover a resource that's scarce and has to be spent in multiple places.

Doing it well requires significant investment in practice and training, often years of it, maybe even decades in order to develop certain levels of expressive fluency.

As with any issue of scarcity, economics comes in. If you want this activity supported, one good way of doing it is enabling the investment of time. Copyright does this by giving people an economic/legal claim on how copies of their work are distributed.

Paying for copies has the usual market merits -- the economic reward and signals of value are proportional to copies acquired. There are other ways of course, common ones brought up here are patronage and merchandising, but they lose the market merits, and both are basically another way of saying "nobody should have to pay for the value in your work directly," and merchandising is even worse in that it's basically saying "yeah, you'll just need another job to support yourself while you're doing this thing", which is time taken away from investment in the creative endeavor, so you'll get less of the actual endeavor.
...or maybe Stand-Up Comedy?
If the message from Bob, proving his identity, was sent in the clear, we're needlessly telling people that Alice is talking to Bob.

In fact earlier TLS versions did send the certificates in the clear which is a lesser version of this problem, TLS 1.3 no longer does that, everything after "Hello" is encrypted.

IETF Best Common Practice 188 (RFC 7258) "Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack" says that for Internet Protocols we should assume that surveillance is inherently an atttack on the Internet and pro-actively defeat it by designing protocols not to leak information unnecessarily.

Now, in this specific case, the Hello message from Alice likely has SNI (Server Name Indication) so probably Alice is saying "Hi Bob" at the start in the clear, but (a) Not necessarily, in some cases this won't happen, so no need to tell us it's Bob later (b) There is ongoing work to fix that, Encrypted Client Hello, which will leverage DNS to give Alice keys she can use to make it harder to know, so there's no reason to make it worse.
> They may not have found the very best person for the job (very subjective and unknowable anyway), but if the process didn't result in an under-performer taking the job, the process did not fail.

My process is that I hire only men. I have not yet had an underperformer. Hence, my process never failed.

At some level, fairness is important. And no, it's not important only when there is a law behind it.
(1) It doesn't matter if the economy will be subject to deflation in future, right now it is not, and while later in this thread you talk about 2nd derivatives being negative that just means the rate growth of inflation is dropping, not inflation itself, so excusing below inflation compensation changes is BS.

(2) If/when deflation does occur, we know from prior instances the reduction in worker compensation is much higher than the rate of deflation.

I don't get this attempt to represent below inflation compensation changes as ok because one day in future some economic change will make this years actions "reasonable", because that is assuming that this year is a one off, rather than recurring. It also presumes that wages won't be cut even more when deflation occurs (generally by mass layoffs and then rehiring the now unemployed when their choices have been reduced to "homeless vs lowered pay").

We also know that businesses don't actually foresee a problem with deflation as they're still happily giving mass payouts and wage increases to their executive management, performing stock buy backs, and issuing large dividends. If companies were actually legitimately concerned about the potential for a deflationary event they would be hoarding cash.
The developers providing everyone with free tools are or course welcome to write those tools in whatever languages they want. But to me, the comment definitions are longer to type and more difficult to parse than inline type definitions. I would much rather use one of the quick TS compilers that don't actually type check when I want to make and test a small change to my source code. But to each their own!
Native speaker, and title confused me even being familiar with the whole owned/pwned thing. I clicked on the article simply because I was curious why being a 4chan-using sole proprietor would be at all interesting.
"ChatGPT has been designed with safety in mind, while I have not. This means that I am more likely to generate harmful or untruthful outputs."

Did it really say that? :)
Wish I had a shit ton of money just to do this
Code generation works better for me compared to GPT-4 and it's a lot faster.
In general, are VPNs liable for how they're used?
To all the people who have been espousing how they appreciate cover letters, good luck - you'll be swimming in them, all AI generated.

There will be a sea of all good, all positive fake text and text will lose its meaning.

We used to appreciate a nicely written mail - now AI will be writing perfectly composed letters. We will learn to appreciate a badly written mail.
Revolutionize your open source workflows: the top why GitHub Codespac
Because this way you get amazing IDE support with code navigation, refactoring, and (with strict mode) warnings about likely bugs and missing null checks.