skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
no, you agree to give certain rights to GitHub when you upload. Rights you do not have with most open source licenses because they do require attribution.

> generated code isn't distributed under under an opensource license

you still have to comply with licenses and if code pilot spits out code which contains nearly verbatim code which was MIT licensed it is not copilot which needs to grant you the license but the original code owner (or you need to at least properly attribute it, through in case of e.g. GPL that is not enough)

but through the act of emitting code via code pilot github does distribute code (without proper attribution) and they do so by getting rights from the uploader to be able to do so. Except that most people uploadig do not have such rights for anything which isn't their code.
Yeah, and a tip jar would have done the trick, too. But just handing her extra money would be a bit socially weird—having the tip button or a jar or something takes that factor out of it.
https://archive.ph/tDGlU
Bad documentation is bad for developers
The Moon's core revealed for the first time
Please explain why you think this is true, it is far from obvious. I don't have time to read the legalese in detail, but from reading an abstract it doesn't seem to be the case.
They also ask you to tip before you've been served.
Publish or perish my friend, you've hit the nail on the head. There is not currently a widely accepted avenue for free open publication in neuroscience because the preprint system (and its lack of peer review) are distrusted, and the A-tier journals know their status and can set their prices based on demand. I, on the other hand, am effectively required to show a regular pattern of publishing in A- and B-tier journals to even be considered competitive for a potential tenure-track position, let alone land one and earn tenure.

This is a major reason I am evaluating alternative career options.
Quite timely, I’m visiting Prague right now and this morning I saw the famous window at the old royal palace! Pretty high, though apparently those defenestred in 1618 survived the 70 metres fall
I tipped my local coffee shop three dollars, drove away with my three drinks, then discovered later they had messed up all my drinks. That was humiliating.

On the other hand, somebody at our local pizza joint recently made the most perfect version of our favorite pizza we've had yet. When it was time to pay, I tipped extra and wrote a note complimenting the worker who made our pizza. That felt good and just.
huh, macOS is part of the reason mac and especially Apple chips were all well received, it's the whole experience and ecosystem, chip without software is useless
Just another ex-eastern block country cooking the same recipe. I still wonder, why all this state agent are allowed into the free net. They usually are not even allowed into the western internet, in china you cant even have a VPN without going to prison. So the normal citizen cant look at western internet, but the western internet allows those state agents to post undeclared content. Its like a trapdoor function rigged against freedom by now. Should just auto-ban all state-actors and affiliated from all social media.
Yes, raise the minimum wage to something that a person can live on.
Also not for those using the free (soon to be killed off over and over again story) legacy version. Almost switched since they were going to kill it but was too lazy to do it straight away and they didn't do it in the end, so lucky me.
In Canada, signing treaties is a matter for the executive. However, the terms of the treaty are not automatically incorporated into Canadian domestic law – the words of a statute win out over a treaty.

Sometimes a treaty can be implemented with just regulation, or it provides a statement of principles that helps interpret legal ambiguities. However, on matters such as the copyright term length discussed in this article, the trade treaty required explicit implementation by statute.
I thought passkeys are always stored in secure enclaves and can't be exported?
Doubt it. They probably have a stock file system image they, well, flash to them. Dd on an industrial scale.
The statement isn't mine [1] and employs the literary device of hyperbole (noun - extravagant exaggeration) in the use of "most."

Definitions of key words from the original statement from Merriam-Webster:

- politics (noun) - ...; the art or science concerned with winning and holding control over a government; political actions, practices, or policies

- vicious (adjective) - dangerously aggressive; marked by violence or ferocity

- bitter (adjective) - ...; distasteful or distressing to the mind

- stake (noun) - ...; something that is staked for gain or loss

The primary _stake_ (something gained or lost) in academics is not the individual academics' wellbeing, but publication and research output, which is often only relevant to very few within siloed fields.
The politics (actions, practices, policies) behind this process - e.g. papers that receive positive reviews but are rejected to protect research moats, or otherwise receive undeservedly _vicious_ (aggressive) comments because peer review operates on a volunteer system that overworks at best and nepotistically gatkeeps at worst - are _bitter_ (distressing to the mind) to the authors who receive mixed feedback as the process is out of their locus of control, yet it is the measure by which academics advance (e.g. graduation, promotion).

In (anti-)academic fashion, I'll bow out of this conversation because the stakes are so low.

[1] https://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/08/18/acad-politics/
Google passkeys are a no-brainer. You’ve turned them on, right?
‘Godfather of AI’ says its threat is ‘more urgent’ than climate change
> an artistic work won’t join the public domain for the life of the author plus another 70 years.

> "Canada will continue to do its part to protect the interests of artists, creators and rights holders, while continuing to balance the needs of industry"

Well no, an artist's interests disappear the moment they die, this is only to protect the interests of the rights holders, most likely only the big ones. At least be straight about it.
Perhaps only the famous/notorious people you read about. The industry drives CEO behavior, not individuals or even one class of individuals.
There will also be a release blogpost, highlighting the new stuff. The release will likely come with that.
Is it worth paying for workspace? If I'm a single person? I'm open to paying $100 for Google products. I already paid for Google one
I describe it as, the internet of books and text became the internet of videos and music. Not better or worse just different.
Or vagrancy laws.
This one is really interesting, thanks. I think it's the closest any mentioned substance comes to passing the "creatine test" (for whatever that test is worth; I just made it up).

(A) The body of research is, in general, large and uncontroversial.

(B) The safety profile is good. The benefits for diabetics are certainly large. Probably no drug has been studied for anti-aging effects as extensively as creatine has been for fitness applications, so I'm not sure anything can fulfill that criteria. But it seems like the present research on metformin supports a variety of positive effects for non-diabetics with more on the way.

(C) I wouldn't know whether the majority of people who are serious about anti-aging use it but it does get mentioned a lot.

Pretty positive endorsement overall!
You are missing the point. Entirely.

If you know of an independent creator and they do something you like, share it.
> English isn't native language anywhere except England (even excluding places like Cornwall that used to speak Celtic languages until the modern era)

I mean, if you really want to play the game, the Angles (along with the Saxons) aren't native to England (i.e. Angle-land); they were a germanic tribe.

Of course, old english is a pretty far cry from the modern incarnation of the language.
I afraid at this point, this topic being so old now, that anyone still using google products is a bit of a laggard. People have been going google-free for ages because of the ever worsening experience - search this site, you don't need me to provide refs.
Supporting higher pressures or higher flow rates through the same area is one way to scale up reverse osmosis, but it requires some serious engineering to do (from the discussion above, very nearly at the “controlling placement at the individual atom” level). Meanwhile another way to scale it up is just make more of these membranes that we know how to easily make, and have bigger areas of membrane.
Yes, the granted rights seem to be mostly about stuff related to repository management, and not e.g.: using the software (except audio/video).

But section D.7 ("Moral Rights") is about waiving moral rights, which at least in Italy is not legal, and then says: "To the extent this agreement is not enforceable by applicable law, you grant GitHub the rights we need to use Your Content without attribution".

It mostly seems like poor wording of that section not being limited to archiving/displaying,
but there is a case where you grant Github something without need of attribution.

Which is against most Open source licenses, which means that I can't upload someone else's code.

Again IANAL, and theoretically open source projects want maximum distribution, but I think this does mean that technically I would grant to Github something I can't grant.
I think it makes sens for people who get themselves signed up for all kinds of newsletters they don't really want and then can't find anything in their inbox. So really it's just another anti-spam filter and comes with the same downsides.
10,000 feels surprisingly small to me. Not that I'm arguing with your perception, I just find it interesting. There are 195 countries, so if those species were evenly distributed by country there would be 51.2 bird species per country.
As a card carrying python-stack scientist who works at the intersection of machine learning and physical sciences for the last decade who now is working on an R package (pro-tip: go where the money is don't bring the money to you), can someone make a convincing argument for me to learn Julia? I would like to hear more than the typical "the code auto-differentiates" or "it's faster" or whatever it is that people have said in the past. I am really not trying to be flippant I just don't see the added value of learning a new language unless it has interesting packages/functionality that my current toolset does not (e.g., this is why I am working on an R package).
Install Podman Desktop for managing containers and learn how to use it for Java development, including use cases from Spring Boot, Quarkus, Testcontainers, Buildpacks.
From a business perspective, that's fantastic ROI, almost infinite. It's basically a donation, handing over money voluntarily with getting nothing in return.
What are the main drawbacks you see with Webflow?
I don't know if we're close, but it seems like a lot of people have an implicit assumption that AGI means we created an artificial person. When in reality whatever intelligent things we create in the digital world are not going to behave like people. I mean, an AGI didn't poop its pants in 3rd grade or have a disapproving father or get ridiculed by a bully or a million other things that people normally go through in their lives that lead to their quirky personalities. It's going to be an anti-septically sheltered weirdo with super-human reasoning and a whole lot of unfunny jokes.
Exactly, I do appreciate micro services but not for the technical aspect.

They shine in large cove base where at least a handful of teams are responsible for some services and not other.

So you don’t have to get in there backlog too much.
In case you aren't trolling (perhaps you are from a country with a culture of Baksheesh for instance [0])

Tipping a government official/government worker will land you in big trouble and is a punishable crime. Trying to bribe a security agent at the mall will get you funny looks and might get the police called on you. Tipping is pretty much only for services to consumers like delivery or at a restaurant or barber or taxi.

If a government service has any fee these will be clearly posted somewhere official and you will be charged the exact amount. Note that prices typically exclude sales tax, but the receipt will show the breakdown for you and the percentages are, again, available from an official source.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baksheesh
The authors have previously also shown off that this can do 3D visualization in real time: https://twitter.com/gabrielweymouth/status/16486827416201953...
Real Fish Fillet Was 3D Printed from Cells Grown in a Lab
This will become even easier now with TrollGPT and similar tooling, you can have one person manage and monitor thousands of accounts and step in where necessary, and the computer program won't accidentally forget to logout of one account when replying to another.
> You just gotta get out of the browser.

I agree with this. The internet is a great tool. The web is extremely problematic and growing less useful over time.

Too many people think that the internet and the web are the same thing.
> "Seriously, who wants to work a job that a machine can do better, cheaper, and more efficiently? Work for the sake of work is not meaningful."

You think Buzz Aldrin didn't want to go to the Moon because a probe with a camera would have been cheaper? I think this claim is flawed; people want to contribute and work. People don't want to be exploited, overworked, underpaid, set in contest with machine production levels.

> "This will only be good for our economy"

Having two trillionaires who swap fortunes every day, and half a billion starving peasants would be great for the economy on paper and awful for the humans. Forget the economy, will this be good for the people? What kind of work is lacking now which a large number of people made unemployed could do to earn a living and stay alive? A hundred years ago houses were cold and empty, pantries were bare, communication was expensive and slow, people walked everywhere in their one suit and drank well water. Now houses are warm, food is refridgerated, comms is cheap and fast, even the quite poor have cars, clothing, and as much clutter as anyone needs, the hungry are not lacking for food production they are lacking for access to food. Are we not nearly saturated with music, books, films, streamers, YouTubers, TV shows, documentaries on anything and everything?

Take a vacuum cleaner, first it didn't exist and people had rugbeaters. Then it existed as a horse drawn vehicle which came around and let rich people vacuum occasionally. Then it became an engine driven thing out in a shed with pipes to every room in a big house and an oil trap. Then it became electric and movable, plugged into light sockets overhead. Then it became small and portable and using mains power, plastic instead of metal, bagged, then upright and light, then bagless, then then quieter, then cyclonic, now cordless or Roomba. And manufactured far away.

How much more development can the vacuum cleaner take which an ordinary person could do - it probably won't be ten million truck drivers, marketing managers, paralegals, or janitors developing the faster charging battery chemistry or the newer automated production line or the fluid dynamics simulation for making it quieter or the more intelligent Roomba software.

All household goods are in a similar position; what's the equivalent of the last 100 years of development for the next 100 years? It's looking pretty likely that it's not flying cars, spaceships, space elevators, jetpacks, teleporters, Star-Trek replicators, silver jumpsuits, food pills, and so far it's looking like it isn't even Blu-Ray, 3D TV, VR headsets. It's all very well to talk about unlimited greed, but at "enough stuff for a lifetime" and then at "hundreds of times more stuff than a lifetime" we have to be approaching some practical limits, don't we?
The reason humans can do it is because you give them a pen a paper so they can do it one step at a time. You are asking chatGPT to do the whole thing in one step.

Give it pairs one at a time and ask it to output the binary value and carry value. You'll see it can do it just as easily as a human doing it step by step with pen and paper.
"Seemed" is the operative word here. Past tense, and indefinite.
Umm revanced ?
As a non-US citizen/resident, I can't wait for Americans to finally riot against tipping, just so they stop doing it abroad. A shame that it had to take comical proportions domestically for people to start questioning it.

Americans tipping abroad while on holidays ruins service for everyone that isn't American – as a non-American you are guaranteed to get worse service than a American in touristy places (and sometimes, to add insult to injury, your own local places), because an American tourist will just insist on tipping 20% or more in places where maybe 1€ = good tip and 2€ = great tip. It doesn't matter if they repeatedly get told not to do it, American tourists keep insisting on doing it to "be nice".

The result is that hospitality obviously optimises for being extra nice to Americans and treat everyone else with apathy. And because you only tip at the end, it doesn't even matter if you were willing to tip like an American, you're going to get the bad treatment (and by then when the bill arrives any motivation to tip well is gone – a classic catch-22). You're basically discriminated for not looking and speaking with an American accent everywhere you go as a tourist.

Please, inform yourselves of tipping cultures when you travel and do it appropriately. Also take in consideration a lot of "this is how much you should tip" guides online are horrible wrong and err on the side of overstating the tip (no idea why – possibly not to offend US sensitivities?). You'd think with all the "cultural appropriation" and "cultural imperialism" awareness these days people would be better in not imposing toxic parts of their culture elsewhere, but here we are.
When I was in college (over a decade ago) I worked in an Apple Store and one of my most memorable stories was trying to help somebody understand that an iPod (Classic I believe) wouldn't get heavier the more albums they stored on it. The customer was clearly not super computer literate, and kept comparing storing albums on an iPod like carrying around tapes or CDs on their Walkman.

They were amazed and delighted when I compared the weight of my iPhone to the weight of one of the store iPods and showed them how much more music was on my iPhone compared to the store iPod.

Teaching people about how technology can improve their lives can really be rewarding.

Of course once they were gone the staff ended up in a debate about the actual technical scientific answer. I don't think we ever came to an agreement on it.
Even forcing people to buy yubikeys is an antipattern.

We shouldn’t be forced to spend money at any company. Where are the Free (beer and Libre) methods??
AMP was a shitshow from day one: when every instance of the product had to load a piece of JS from Google’s servers[1] unless you wanted a 8sec delay[2] then you knew that you were in for a bad time.

[1] <script async src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0.js"></script> is required on every AMP page

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21714264
I don’t know how much their wages are to calculate their pay discrepancy that their employers are cheating them nor do I have their income statements. The employers’ responsibility is being put on to the customers. And then the customers are the assholes for guessing wrong.
The Debt and The Debt Limit are vastly different things. Republicans can bring up the Debt Limit at any time. They only do it when a Democratic Administration is present. They have no problem massively bloating budgets. The Debt Limit is an unconstitutional artificial crisis to approve borrowing of debt already accrued. If you want to solve debt you do it when you set the budget not when the credit card bill is due.
> Excessive tips are the only way a lot of people working in the service industry survive at all.

Not in Europe
Don't forget juno!

(though that one at least I legitimately chide people for using, because I have family members whose devices got infected because juno failed to filter out malicious emails appearing to come from personal contacts).
Not yet, as its work in progress, but we want to push a initial docu how to set up our current progress this week.
Yes, I struggle with that all the time - and not getting bogged down into yet another explainer that they are not the same thing!
This is already tested. There are state minimum wages well above the average that don't see wild price spikes. It turns out owners can in fact pay a higher minimum wage without substantially increasing prices, they just prefer not to.
Looking at the comments I would double check the benchmarks because maybe the CPUs are faster then I thought for LLMs?

I know my 4090 for Stable Diffusion isn't even comparable to my i7 8700k and AFAIK the AMD/Intel offerings still don't compare for LLMs but admittedly it's possibly they've caught up?

I don't have a ton of time at the moment to keep looking, I have a very hard time believing the M1 can keep up with a 4090 at all, I just don't want you to drop 1.7k if I'm wrong :P

EDIT: Oh to clarify - The 4090 can definitely run the 30B model without issue with 4bit quantization.
I was expecting something like this article https://alexkrupp.typepad.com/sensemaking/2021/06/django-for... (discussed at the time https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27605052) but was greeted with something far more abstract and less helpful. Look at the difference in quality of their table of contents!

- What does our app do?
- Microservices usually don't work well for startups
- Move fast and outsource things
- Consider building reusable things
- Be pragmatic
- Boundaries along sync/async communication patterns
- How we did it and how we would do it next time
- About flexibility

- Predictability
- Rule #1: Every endpoint should tell a story
- Rule #2: Keep business logic in services
- Rule #3: Make services the locus of reusability
- Rule #4: Always sanitize user input, sometimes save raw input, always escape output
- Rule #5: Don't split files by default & never split your URLs file
- Readability
- Rule #6: Each variable's type or kind should be obvious from its name
- Rule #7: Assign unique names to files, classes, and functions
- Rule #8: Avoid *args and **kwargs in user code
- Rule #9: Use functions, not classes
- Rule #10: There are exactly 4 types of errors
- Simplicity
- Rule #11: URL parameters are a scam
- Rule #12: Write tests. Not too many. Mostly integration.
- Rule #13: Treat unit tests as a specialist tool
- Rule #14: Use serializers responsibly, or not at all
- Rule #15: Write admin functionality as API endpoints
- Upgradability
- Rule #16: Your app lives until your dependencies die
- Rule #17: Keep logic out of the front end
- Rule #18: Don't break core dependencies
- Why make coding easier?
- Velocity
- Optionality
- Security
- Diversity