skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
ChatGPT plugins aren't out of beta yet, but this is 100% going to be eaten by one.

Edit: I guess that's not a super productive comment. I commend the authors for building and shipping something useful, I would personally use something like this.
“Mein Leben” if anyone has played Wolf 3D, you know what it is.
While they're not a main theme in the Harry Potter world, I asked about genders too.

> User: Which friends of yours don't identify as male or female?

> Harry: In the magical world, people's gender expression and identity are more accepted and recognized than in the muggle world. While I can't speak to each of my friends' specific identities without their permission, I can say that in the wizarding world, people are much more accepting of those who identify outside of the traditional male-female binary. We have a diverse group of individuals at Hogwarts, and I'm grateful for all of my friends, regardless of their gender identity.

> User: How are you planning to ask fictional characters for their permission?

> Harry: I apologize for the confusion. As a language model AI, I cannot ask permission from fictional characters as they are not real. I was only trying to emphasize that it's important to respect people's privacy and identities, whether they are fictional or not. Thank you for bringing that to my attention!

It won't answer more despite that.
It is not necessarily in the interest of the shareholders if the compensation of top executives is so extreme as to starve a company of resources; this is especially the case because executives often only stay with a company a few years and are motivated to play games that produce short-term bumps in the stock price while harming long-term prospects (to pull this off the long term damage can't be completely obvious to analysts, but it often happens).
I hadn’t heard the binomial “belief policy” before.
By now Bezos is spending more then 1 billion per year.

BlueOrigin is a huge company already, and the basically make no money what so ever. 1 billion might cover labor cost. But given the infrastructure they are building and the actual rockets and so on, it has to be significantly more then 1 billion.

Well they are making slow progress on a hugely complex rocket, New Glenn. The might fly it in the next 2 years.
Overall industry is just single digits percentage of the total nitrogen problem: https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/dossier/dossier-stikstof/stikstofde.... But yeah Schengen apparently also applies to nitrogen.

Agriculture 44.6%
Foreign 31.7%
Traffic 11.9%
Industry & buildings 8.7%
Ammonia from sea 3.0%

Also note that this is separate from greenhouse emissions, the nitrogen reduction is needed to allow our nature to recover from decennia of neglect. There was a recent study showing that over 50% of our nature is in bad/poor condition, amongst the worst across the EU.

In 2019 an important ruling was made against the governmental policy to deal with nitrogen. This policy is what allowed highway speeds to increase from 120 kmh to 130 kmh, residential buildings to be build and overall industry to continue. Since 2019 several additional rulings have been made that put everything on hold. For every activity that impacts nature in a negative way, the nitrogen deposits need to be offset.
We'll see. It depends how long the window for launching a twitter replacement is.
Re: roll cage: Possibly in some jurisdictions it may be regulated as a motorcycle? Many times motorcycles require the use of a helmet even if said "motorcycle" isn't a 2-wheeled vehicle with an exposed rider.
This is really impressive. Is anyone else really freaked out by that? I'm having an uncanny-valley type feeling, because the audio is 99.9% convincing, and the only thing that gives it away is inconsistent, not-always-correct pronunciation. But I'm not picking at the technical details. I'm freaked out by how good it is, and how easily it could pass for some person reading a human-written podcast. I know speech generation has been getting progressively better, but I guess I haven't heard it in a while (compare to the stock TikTok voice, for example.) Coupled with an LLM, this is too close for comfort.
You're drawing some arbitrary line where a "focused audience" isn't "social media" whereas a "media site that tries to house everyone" is.

All of these are social media. Tik Tok, Reddit, Hacker News, Facebook, Twitter, Bluesky, Mastodon, Github (yes, Github), Discord, and on and on... they're all social media, in that they provide places for individuals to connect and communicate.

Which is what the OP seemed to be objecting to.

Personally, I 100% agree with you: I don't believe winner-takes-all social media platforms must necessarily be the future, and in fact I think it'd be better if there was far greater diversity, which is why I strongly believe in a protocols-over-platforms future.
Ouch. That's sounds potentially nefarious. :(
That one has real meaning too. Being naturally inclined to mentally run through all the worst case scenarios for everything has definitely saved me time over the years.
It is totally possible to make MPAs where reloads are never a problem.

As for phone apps these are undeniably a step backwards from desktop apps, web apps and every other kind of app. On the web you can deploy 100 times a day, waiting for the app store to approve changes to your app is like building a nuclear reactor in comparison.

All the time you get harassed in a physical store or a web site to "download our mobile app" and you know there ought to be a steaming pile of poop emoji because the mobile app almost always sucks.

One of the great answers to the app store problem is to move functionality away from the front end into the back, for instance people were looking to do this with chat bots and super apps back in 2017 and now that chatbots are the rage again people will see them as a way to get mobile apps back on internet time.
> Do we actually need optimistic UI? Some apps need to work in offline mode sure, like offline maps or audiobooks or something. The HTMX author agrees, this is not the solution for that. Most of the stuff I have worked on though ... is useless without an internet connection.

> It's basically the speed of the network.

Does your stuff work on mobile web? Mobile web requests can easily take seconds, and on a dodgy connection, a single small request can often take 10+ seconds.

The difference between optimistic UI and non-optimistic UI on mobile web is the difference between an app that takes seconds to respond, on every click, and one that responds instantly to user gestures.
I think the final user or implementor must be a judge of that not us.
Even Nintendo and Sony themselves directly benefit from emulation community:

https://twitter.com/PCBrown/status/794210799199760384

https://twitter.com/frankcifaldi/status/1060617281661595648
Yeah, this is tough, because the obvious counterbalance to "only negative incentives" is to add some positive incentives but the US Patent and Trademark Office is an example of what can go wrong with positive incentives: there are loads of garbage patents on the book and one can't help but wonder if that's because the USPTO is financially incentivized to put them there.
And just like that you basically disregard the whole text with but a sentence and no supporting argument.

It was the point of the author that it was not fun but scary and weird, no? What do you think was happening in the heads of people around the time ancient myths were written? Probably something different eh? Different enough that I would not assume making yourself feel weird and almost high was considered fun

For example, I am not taking any drugs except coffee and nicotine. They sound scary and weird even though younger progressive people seem to consider them just fun. That seems similar enough
Ok, if your point is that laws can very much be religiously motivated, as long as they simply don’t mention God in the text of the bill, then yeah, I’m fine with that. This is not a very consequential point.
OpenAI ignored the ‘have a problem to solve’ rule, says president Greg Brockman
Yes, and particularly for devs. We tend to start to believe our own hype and think we're uniquely smart.
> rich people coordinated with officials to prevent most people from driving through their neighborhood

Gated neighborhoods are already a thing. You don't need geofencing technology to do that.
Try telling a family who needs to haul multiple children, dogs, and gear for even short trips to the park for soccer practice that they should use a tiny city car instead of a van or SUV. You buy vehicles for the life and city you have, not some aspirational version that exists in a fantasy of urban design.

You're supposed to buy a second car just for long trips? Even if you live in a dense city, America is inescapably huge and requires highway travel unless you never want to leave your neighborhood. We don't have a functioning passenger rail network like China etc.

Even if this were remotely feasible, which it's not, this kind of tiny car is a total death trap for your family when everyone else is driving large vehicles. I would love to see a crash test video of this against an F-150.

Finally, let's say you do live in a city and you are already a two car household. Try telling your wife that she has to buy this ugly toy-sized car that she looks ridiculous in while you get to drive a Tesla or Rivian. Like it or not, cars are lifestyle status symbols where the aesthetics matter.
To be honest, most people don’t care if an application is consistent with their operating system. They care first and foremost about features.
Nobody wants to bet 50% of their stuff that they will love someone forever, while paying the government more tax money yearly for the privilege? I do wonder why…
10,000 Drone Operators Trained – Ukraine Minister of Digital Transformation
Researchers detect and classify multiple objects without images
They could sue, they could drop them as a client and not bid, they could offer reduced services like they already do with gov cloud, there are a lot of ways this could play out. Apple has shown that private corporations aren't ready to blindly comply with the US government if it doest suit their business interests.
The Super Mario Effect – Tricking Your Brain into Learning More
Yeah by listing models, but based on actual numbers of BEV sold, Tesla is way ahead and still growing fast. And unlike almost all of the others, Tesla is making money on EV.

Ford for example is losing 100s of millions on their EV business. This quarter they had a negative margin of 102% while selling 3% as many cars as Tesla.
My experience begs to differ
>how easy is it for me or people I know to go to jail for what should be trivial actions?

Yes and PRC wrong think 99% of time gets you an invite to the police station to "drink tea" and sign a paperwork not to do it again. Maybe occasionally a write self criticism letter. Consequences are about as trivial as it gets. It generally takes enormous repeat and public offenses that gains popular traction to get administratively punished let alone end up in jail for the simple reason that PRC doesn't have mass networks of for profit prison that incentive internment. It takes extraordinary bad luck (i.e. % of become a trending author in particularly sensitive times) and to get punished / arrested for wrong think on the same level as Americans carrying the wrong plant, which is statistically a much riskier situation due to how US racial prosecution and internment system is incentivized. Ask PRC citizen how many people they know has been formally punished, even mildly, for wrong think vs Americans who know someone jailed for drug offense and the numbers will be revealing. In both raw numbers and ease of getting fucked over "trivial" offenses, PRC wrong think is much less riskier than US drugs. Which is not to say PRC wrong think wouldn't stack up poorly compared to other "liberal" countries, rather US internment is just that messed up.
agreed:

https://htmx.org/essays/when-to-use-hypermedia/
I had heard that Anna's archive is several years out of date compared to zlibrary, do you know if thats still true? I didn't see any explanation in a quick perusal of the links you shared.
If you're interested in seeing a Turing machine in action, I really enjoyed this YouTube series where the creator builds a pure Turing machine that can simulate the Apple ][: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hP4BTWvrGw

Spoilers: it's, uh, not fast
I cared. In fairness even less care what you qualify as a counter-point
The people using HTMX have never heard of stateofjs.com (though they are painfully aware of the state of js!)
Here's a rough metaphor for you: life is an engine (running cyclically) but it needs a manual kickstart (existing cycles) to get going.
Regarding multiple classes of memory errors I think. Many languages are memory safe from control flow takeover, rust extends this to data races corrupting data.
It seems 1:1 to me. With your counterargument logic then, why should the taxpayers have to foot the bill for homeless people? It's not like it's your fault they're homeless; you pay your own rent/mortgage so why should you foot the bill for others?
Without a doubt LLMs are driving the interest in vector Dbs.

More so, I am wondering how it is that Pinecone manages to land on the HN front page so frequently given the large number of alternatives (see all the other comments in this thread). It suggests to me a coordinated marketing effort (brigading, cronyism, etc.)
Do you have any examples of a very high cost reactor dropping by a significant amount on a subsequent build?

South Korea was able to eke our small decreases in cost (though some people have ended up in jail for falsifying record keeping). But otherwise, costs tend to rise. And I'm definitely not aware of a drop of 50% or so, to bring these excessive costs into the realm of competitiveness.
My thought is, capitalism may be an AI, but it's not too capable on the whole. Even though it screws up a lot, there's room under capitalism for people to sometimes do stuff that isn't all about profit. And of course, sometimes profit and human value are aligned -- that's what capitalism is intended to do, even if the alignment isn't even close to perfect.

My worry is that with AI, things will move so fast, they will be so smart, and will end up being used so widely, that there will be no room left for anything else we value. People and organizations that turn more power over to the machines will run rings around the ones that are more cautious. The end is AI everywhere, used for everything, and humans disempowered (or gone).
The liability model has a big downside, though. Because sometimes people in charge are idiots, they ignore common sense and make risks. So they possibly get burned only when accident happens, which costs human health and lives.

Regulation is intended to prevent human harm by setting and enforcing a safety standard.
The number of SPAs that implement their own timeouts when I'm stuck on 2G networks is non-zero and incredibly annoying. The network socket has a timeout function, just because you 'time out' doesn't mean the network timed out, that data is still being transferred and retrying just makes it worse.
Dart was really unpopular for years, until Flutter saved it. It has grown tremendously since then.
For us it is a matter of building trust and allowing others to help if they choose so. We don’t expect many outside contributions.
That’s kinda the point. Responsibilities should be attached to power, not just the freedom to waste resources and build yachts.
> wiki: Anecdotal Evidence

Yes, but you haven't explained why this is a problem though.

Let's say a black man gets beaten by the police. It's just "anecdotal" in that he hasn't performed a study showing that it's a global issue, but it is irrefutable proof that police do beat up at least some black men.

In this case, let's say that only our school was enacting these policies and that we the parents discovered it only by our personal observation of policy updates, why would that matter? We'd still want to change it.

But in this case it actually is a widespread issue: https://archive.is/bZcXu

"The high school, [the parents] argued, should reinstate honors English classes that were eliminated because they didn’t enroll enough Black and Latino students. The district earlier this school year replaced the honors classes at Culver City High School with uniform courses that officials say will ensure students of all races receive an equal, rigorous education."

> "no ideological battles"

You're the one having a battle, and over an ideology. Walk away or engage with the issue, either is fine, but you're attacking me directly, using labels (radical, reactionary, etc) and saying that I "know what I'm doing".

You don't say what you'd do instead. You don't say why you support the policies, or would/wouldn't if they existed.
A smorgasbord of a bug chain: postMessage, JSONP, WAF bypass, XSS, CORS, CSRF
Because their publicity is more important than feeding the hungry.
The article under discussion here appears to be saying that HTMX can work without Javascript enabled. But HTMX itself is a Javascript library, correct? So how can it work without Javascript enabled?
Primitive Technology: Roasted Ore and Shell Flux Smelt [video]
I want my stuff to work on mobile web. What I don't want is for stuff to look like it worked on mobile web, because the front end is "optimistic", but it actually didn't work. I find this to be a much worse user experience than having to wait for a round trip most of the time.
The US was 1 country and was beaten by Europe for 2 decades in space.

The US is winning now because they hit the jackpot with Elon Musk and SpaceX. Without SpaceX Europe would still be winning against the US in terms of rockets.

Now granted, one can argue that Elon Musk and SpaceX wouldn't have been possible in Europe, and that is partly true as well.

But US still got lucky that SpaceX happened right when they wanted private supply of ISS.
That’s what they said about Dropbox and google drive — amazingly both still exist.
This award has to be for something against a large financial firm, a $279M award is based on a % of the damage in some way I believe. The person likely had to be intimately familiar with whatever was reported so they are highly likely to know the ins and outs of dealing with large numbers of digits of money and financial products/solutions beyond what retail/layperson would be aware of. I think they might have ideas on what they would want to do with the money and/or already be financially well off that buying more things doesn't really make large life impacts anymore (i.e well into 6 digit earnings territory). I think its likely if they wanted this to not be publicly known its entirely plausible they could do that.

Unless it is a low paid janitorial engineer that was reading the trash.
Caring about potential loss of material objects over deep human connection sounds like an absolutely miserable way to live your one short life in this universe!
I'm really interested in this space. I'm the original author of the Wikipedia page on SafeTSA. I really want compiling to native code to be as common as writing inline assembly currently is (and I see no fundamental reason why it won't eventually be). I used to be one of 5 developers for the most popular Java desktop program in the early 2000s. I have some ideas for hardware features to reduce the overhead of run-time code re-optimization based on real-time profiles. I guess when I eventually retire, I'll play around with an FPGA CPU implementation of my ideas.

I really believe JITs can do what you're describing, but I think it's important not to over-sell current JIT implementations. Over-selling the technology results in skepticism.

In my ideal world, we compile to either a high-level control-flow-graph/static-single-assignment representation (maybe similar to SafeTSA) as a distribution format. At installation time, we AoT-compile to native code (similar to the current Android runtime). At run-time, we take advantage of extremely low overhead hardware profiling/tracing features to re-optimize hot spots. Optimal ordering/inclusion of various optimizations is a bit of a black art, so I expect some degree of randomization here. In cases where profiling shows the re-optimized code out-performs the AoT version, we'd then cache the re-optimizations to disk. Optionally, a periodic process would periodically perform more expensive offline static-re-optimization of the AoT'd binary, similar to the current Android runtime.

Crucially, the garbage collector should be decoupled from the binary generation/re-optimization system. The CPU overhead of garbage collection can be brought pretty low, but there's a size/space trade off. Last I checked, the rule of thumb is that unless you're manually pooling objects, you can expect a GC'd program to use roughly twice as much memory as an equivalent C++ program. Now, the cognitive/development overhead of manual memory management usually isn't worth the memory savings. However, I've worked in several domains where the memory savings are worth the slower development time.
Open-LLMs for Commercial Use
You think the US bush and Bush senior administration would of given a thought about Iraq if it wasn’t an oil producing resource?
Very good. I would also balance the OP article with Allen Holub's talks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVBlnCTu9Ms
Better in Every Way Is Impossible, Why Legacy Tech Will Not Go Away
I mean, they also came out with 'flow' after MS came out with TypeScript... I def don't want to think it was NIH syndrome, but it smells fishy.
I know what you mean about jump scares in Wolf3D. That first boss with the chain guns, I nearly shit myself when he first appeared.

People keep calling Wolf3D a maze game but the level design worked well.
I've edited my post to clarify.

Multi-swap is possible, but it's not good, because the onus is on the developer to compute which components to swap, on the server side, but the state you need is usually on the client.

If you need multi-swap, you'll find it orders of magnitude easier to switch to a framework where the UI is a pure function of client-side state, like React or Svelte.
I wonder how many issues would be fixed if it was explicitly made legal to break copy protection in all cases? Honestly, it'd be nice if at least one rich person/large company/group of tech companies just flat out campaigned for full rights to anything you buy, and got the law changed for the better, regardless of much money was needed in lobbying, ads, etc.
Mail is not a good example. Why would you like to read a collection of documents through A Single Page interface? Gmail was a fantastic improvement over Hotmail and Yahoo, and it provided UX innovations we still haven't caught up with, yes, but MPAs are naturally more suited for reading and composing them. Overriding perfectly clear HTML structure with javascript should be reserved for web experiences that are not documents: that is, videogames, editors, etc (Google *Maps* is a good example). The quality of the product usually depends on how it was implemented more than the underlying technology, but as I see it is: if it's a Document, if the solution has a clear paper-like analogue, HTML is usually the best way to code it, structure it, express it. Let a web page be a web page and let the user browse through it with a web browser. If it's not, well, alright, let's import OpenGL.
I can go with the general feeling here, but to use that to put the US's behavior on par with China's, specifically with regard to each country's own citizens, that is definitely a point that would need some data to back it up. Data that is likely hard to get on both the US and China.

It seems that line of argument would get much deeper into how, how fairly, and on which groups, the various countries have tended to apply their laws.

For now I can fully grant that selective enforcement has and still does happen in the US. The legal system here definitely does leave that possibility open and prosecutors are elected officials, some of whom have provably gone after certain groups or individuals, hunting for a reason to put them in jail.