skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This makes no sense. Two different factors are two different factors. I might want two devices to be involved to setup a new login to critical services. One I'd always have at home so only with access both to me and my home you'd be able to login.
OpenAI is a nonprofit, it owns the for profit org that it created. It's not acquirable.
Maybe Austral?

https://austral-lang.org/
Honestly, it can't. What it will do instead is cause the most abrupt wealth concentration in the history of humankind. This will create 'revolutionary' conditions, although the shape and direction of that revolution will differ from context to context. In some places, it is likely to be fascist; in others, socialist; in still others, unexplored, undiscovered options. It will be a time of experimentation -- or as Gramsci eloquently, and more pessimistically, put it, a "time of monsters."

But what is going away, permanently, is the space between extremes. Pour one out. I miss it already.
Yes it does. It’s a fun problem to make a sudoku solver

https://technology.amis.nl/it/solving-a-sudoku-with-one-sql-...
Guess who happy DHH was reading this
In the music industry that appears to have been the case since iTunes hit the scene. The ease of distribution has enabled countless artists that nobody has ever heard of and will never listen to. Yet some have risen up and become hits despite this.
This is the root of the issue; smaller landlords can find out that subletting is happening because they only have one or two properties, and may even live in one.

Massive landlords can't do that, because they have thousands of tenants; but facial recognition and computers could flag the ones to be interested in, and then they hire the private investigators.
Funny, those languages rely heavily on the Java ecosystem and libraries, and they better hope the Java ecosystem keeps thriving, improving current libraries and producing new libraries else they become impractical. Show me your pure Clojure production grade http servers or database drivers ;)
I don't understand this. Presumably the natives thought it was a good deal? Or were they sold a lie? Like "yea buddy come back anytime?" Either way doesn't preclude that we can peaceably transfer ownership. I mean if the natives are pissed because they got hoodwinked then the rule doesn't need to be "noone shalt own land" it could be "don't fraudulently do business". If we are saying nobody owns land then I suspect that means I'm crammed into a tin can and somebody out there owns a whole fuck load of land.
Yes, it just queries. I'm confused why people would confuse this with intelligence. It's like an upgraded Clippy.
Useless to most Europeans though. I have to pay 15%-30% of the value of any US stock I buy in tax when i sell (to the US government), no matter the initial investment. I own about 10K euros of TSLA stock, and when I sell (as a EU citizen) the US government will take %30.

Stock dividend of 5-10% is pretty much unheard of here.
Ed Sheeran found not liable for copyright infringement in Marvin Gaye lawsuit
Jiko Money Storage
I agree; there many odd writing choices. For example, this is a very confusing end to the first sentence:

> to pay unshared attention to our mission

...unshared attention?
Also, one can make Office plugins.
anyone have any thoughts or experience with this?
It's likely they will all be free in time. That's kind of the problem underlying the consternation here.

It's the internet all over again. How do you win the race to the bottom?

Once there

How do you compete effectively with free? Microsoft and Amazon will have billions on billions coming in to float their free offerings for what is effectively eternity in business terms. Probably Google and Meta will as well. What happens to everyone else?

I think you have to be in some niche market where you can charge. Because for everyone else, free is unsustainable.

Porn maybe? But there will be way too many competitors there. So something more like medical. Or semiconductors. Or construction or something.
Growth =/= divident. Demographics is more than just pyramid, have to consider workforce / productive composition and actual ability to realize potential, especially when comparing polities with order(s) of magnitude difference in population and human capita catchup/potential.

> Not China

Hence especially China.

Scale of PRC moving workforce from currently 25% skilled to 70-85% over (developed economy level) next few generation even with net population decline is roughly creating 3-5 new Japans, or another 1-1.5 US worth of high productive divident. Within a few generations, through system largely with good track record ability to move up skill/value chain. Most other developing countries have been spinning wheels for too long to take face value postive prognosis seriously. But PRC doing so at PRC scale is special case, no other country is structurally able to replicate this feat, because they lack scale (US even with immigration), or coordination (India on other in same pop class but systemically incapable and not trending towards being so).
So why is it called "ur"?
It takes millions of dollars to generate the weights, shouldn't it have some legal protection?
Sounds like NYC needs to add more housing supply to take the power away from corporate landlords.
Most console games end up having textures high res enough to look better than the original hardware if you render them at a higher internal resolution. There are some Wii and Wii U games that look spectacular if rendered at higher res, and the same applies to Switch.

If you emulate on fast enough hardware, for games that emulate well you will hit whatever the game's framerate cap is (sometimes 30, sometimes 60) flawlessly where the native hardware struggles.
We’ll have some ebb and flow between industry and academia which will spread concepts just as it does in other industries. It’s slower, but it still gets the job done.
Thank you for being a voice of righteousness in a sea of simps.

It’s hard to tell on this site, are people really this devoted to corps or are they shills?

Even with what you said there are still so many people defending this behavior. The world is full of weak and/or deceitful people.
>1000mg caffeine per day
>64oz diet coke per day

perhaps a bit of moderation
Hey! Have you tried out Edge Streaming yet? It uses the Edge Runtime which is a fraction of the cost of serverless functions and lets you stream responses for much longer than 10 seconds, giving you the "chatting" effect that you see on ChatGPT.

Docs: http://vercel.fyi/streaming
Example: https://vercel.com/blog/gpt-3-app-next-js-vercel-edge-functi...
Obligatory mention of the KLF burning a million pounds (for those who are unaware):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K_Foundation_Burn_a_Million_Qu...
This gets attention due to being a leak, but it’s still just one Googler’s opinion and it has signs of being overstated for rhetorical effect.

In particular, demos aren’t the same as products. Running a demo on one person’s phone is an important milestone, but if the device overheats and/or gets throttled then it’s not really something you’d want to run on your phone.

It’s easy to claim that a problem is “solved” with a link to a demo when actually there’s more to do. People can link to projects they didn’t actually investigate. They can claim “parity” because they tried one thing and were impressed. Figuring out if something works well takes more effort. Could you write a product review, or did you just hear about it, or try it once?

I haven’t investigated most projects either so I don’t know, but consider that things may not be moving quite as fast as demo-based hype indicates.
It's not. A narrow bank is one that effectively passes on the federal funds rate as interest to a demand checking account. T-bills are a completely different animal.
I feel the same about them all, tho MS google and fb all top the ranks imho
> So I use ChatGPT every day. I like it a lot and it is useful but it is overhyped.

It is incorrectly hyped. The vision most pundits have is horribly wrong. It is like people who thought librarians would be out of work because of ebooks, barking up the wrong tree.

ChatGPT does amazing things, but it is also prone to errors, but so are people! So what, people still get things done.

Imaging feeding ChatGPT an API for smart lights, a description of your house, and then asking it to turn on the lights in your living room. You wouldn't have to name the lights "living room", because Chat GPT knows what the hell a living room is.

Meanwhile, if I'm in my car, and I ask my phone to open Spotify, it will occasionally open Spotify on my TV back home. Admittedly it hasn't done for quite some time, I presume it may have been a bug Google fixed, but that bug only exists because Google Assistant is, well, not smart.

Here is an app you could build right now with ChatGPT:

1. Animatronics with voice boxes, expose an API with a large library of pre-canned movements and feed the API docs to ChatGPT

2. Ask ChatGPT to write a story, complete with animations and poses for each character.

3. Have ChatGPT emit code with API calls and timing for each character

4. Feed each character's lines through one of the new generation of TTS services, and once generation is done, have the play performed.

Nothing else exists that can automate things to that extent. A specialized model could do some of it, but not all of it. Maybe in the near future you can chain models together, but right now ChatGPT does it all, and it does it really well.

And ChatGPT does all sorts of cool things like that, mixing together natural language with machine parsable output (JSON, XML, or create your own format as needed!)
You've interviewed at places that didn't require you to talk about yourself?

Just because Shopify might name it something specific, doesn't mean it's all that unique. Some companies hold this potion entirely on a first/second phone call, others might having an initial section of the interview dedicated to talking about yourself and your experience.

Not sure how this weeds out non-native or non-extroverted people, both of whom are very capable of talking about their experiences. It would be great if you wouldn't infantilize them.
All the things you mentioned make it a platform, but even as a model, none of the smaller open-source models come close to GPT 3.5 or 4 in my experience. You can test it by using the GPT3.5 or 4 with their API. They outputs are waaaay better than anything I get from the open source models.
> I'm also curious what the copyright status of these models even is

That's my question as well. The models are clearly derivative works based on other people's copyrighted texts.

Only a twisted court system would allow Google/OpenAI/Facebook to build models on other people's work and then forbid other people to build new models based on GOF's models.
I constantly get between 154 and 156 ns/url when running on an M2 Air 2022 while using asahi linux instead of MacOs.
22 Celsius according to smartmontools :)
> it's well-known that it's mostly software differences to make it the performance version.

Do you have a source of this, news to me
This is an interesting case where you really want to use AHK v2 now due to the improved language and built-in functionality, but ChatGPT is useless for it.
Sorry for the dumb question. But in the context of the AI space, what is moat?
Amid a child labor crisis, U.S. state governments are loosening regulations
Kind of, see: https://odri.discourse.group/

It is indeed pricey though, IIRC the cost of a Boston Dynamics Spot-like robot came down to around $6-7k. There is still room to drive the price down though.
dup https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35805789
El Niño is coming. Here's what that means for weather in the U.S.
> He isn’t forcing you to use Facebook.

Tell that to anyone who needs to use an Oculus device for work. Facebook required, friend!
Transformers can't match brackets beyond some fixed depth, but RNNs and LSTMs can match unbounded brackets.
Why would my car, that I purchased, have ads at all?
I got IKEA Tradfri controllers for my Hue "network" because I didn't want to always be looking for my phone and loading the app, they work although color changing isn't possible.

In theory you could get a Pi to host a website that talks to the Hue hub's REST API. Actually, I'd be surprised if such a thing doesn't exist on GitHub, but it could be a hunt to find one with has a more than decent UI.
Why would I want remote access to my car? Why should my car need security notifications? And if I'm charging, I can use that as an opportunity to get out of the car, or catch up on notifications I've ignored for the last several hours. Every routine fix that I've seen on a car has been something mechanical, which either I can do myself (e.g. oil and bulb changes) or I have to take into a shop anyway.

The only semi-valid reason for connectivity here is navigation, but even then I'm already paying for a connection for my phone so I'll use that instead. I don't even want a big screen on the dashboard anyway, which means having navigation software built-in would be a worse experience than using what I already have.
The method described looks similar to [0] which extends Euclidean spline curves to Lie groups using the exponential map (here the conversion from/to scaled-angle-axis)

[0]: A general construction scheme for unit quaternion curves with simple high order derivatives https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/218380.218486
Financier buys Jeffrey Epstein's private islands, with plans to create a resort
I think the spirit of the Stable Diffusion moment comment is that there is a ton of work blossoming around LLMs, largely because there's a good base model that is now available.

And that's undeniable, IMO -- llama.cpp, vicuna are some really prominent examples. People are running language models on Raspberry Pis and smartphones. Anyone who wants to tinker can.

Now, all the stuff that's built on top of LLaMa is currently encumbered, yes.

But all of that work can likely be transferred to an unencumbered base model pretty easily. The existence of the ecosystem around LLaMa makes it much more likely that someone will create an unencumbered base model. And it seems like that is already happening, for example, the Red Pajama folks are working on this.
That's nice, until the entire industry decides that this needs to happen. This is why the mystical "free market" is only "free" for corporations.
They are tho. I made north of half a million a year in the US and am still moving back to the EU.

It's not just about how much I make, that reaches diminishing returns relatively quickly.

It also matters how well other people, not in tech live. I got tired of all the homelessness around me caused by low wages and high rents. I got tired of all the drug abuse that happens as a result of that hopeless situation. I got tired of all the crime that follows.

I want to go back to a society that works, not just a dystopian hell scape where I can be rich.
Frankly, this sort of open-access to terminated employees is irresponsible.
Most of that you get better with your phone; the rest, I don't have, don't feel the lack, and wouldn't think to look for in a new car.
Yep, regulating the ladder behind you is a classic monopolist move
Economically OK, but expect more social fissures between cultures and generations, especially when welfare and upward mobility will diminish with more bodies.
AI might be a vessel of intelligence, like bulletin boards.
isn't it the other way around? criminalizing prostitution taskes away options to seek help by those who are exploited or abused.
New York state is set to ban fossil fuels in new construction starting in 2026
The original phrase was coined by the World Economic Forum. What the critics leave out is that the WEF was saying that people would be happier not owning anything.

>You will own nothing and you will be happy.

Alternatively it could have a darker interpretation: you will be a slave and you will be happy, because that's all you're going to get.

I suppose it depends if you look at the WEF as a benevolent institution looking to benefit humanity or very rich people looking to solidify their own position at any cost.
The 36 corridor between Denver and Boulder was home to a ton of storage tech startups in the first dotcom boom. There’s still a street called “Tape Drive”.
I actually totally agree with you on both.

I mean China regarding pop growth. China will be fine because like you said, highly skilled workforce and fully developed modern infrastructure. And I think AI and robotic automation will fill the void of population decline.

Mainly I'm alluding to the up and coming places that aren't developed. With all the negativity out there now, I see tons of potential - but it's outside of the western world (in particular, outside of Western Europe).
Interesting, the first thing this says is the thing the current top comment remarks is insinuated but never proven, completely without evidence.

I wonder if we'll ever see machine generated summaries used to call out behaviors that are presently subtle and difficult to deal with.
> We can’t fire people on the spot but close enough (here in NL). It’s true ish that we can’t motivate people with fear though, we have to actually make them like their jobs, and carefully consider at the right moment whether to extend contracts. Again, not really a hindrance.

It's not really about motivation. Difficulty of terminating employment can make employees a real liability when you're small if they turn out to be a bad fit.

Bigger businesses can accept it as cost of doing business, but it may break a small business.
> you kinda lose the benefit of the doubt.

Losing benefit of the doubt doesn't mean you're guilty.

It just means when Russia accused the UK [1] of blowing up the pipeline you can't trust them. Or when Russia accuses the US [2] of blowing up the pipeline you can't trust them. It doesn't mean the US or UK didn't do it; it just means Russian claims are not evidence and you'd probably be better off just completely ignoring them so that it doesn't taint any opinions.

[1]: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-british-nav...

[2]: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-09/russia-bl...
Maybe it's like "low serotonin levels" is to depression. A mechanism through which some effects are expressed, but not the root cause, and only one aspect of the condition.
> It takes millions of dollars to generate the weights, shouldn’t it have some legal protection?

It does, if you choose to keep them internally as a trade secret.

It does, if you share it only with people you contract with not to disclose it.

But, for copyright specifically, rather than “some legal protection” more generally, the “it takes millions of dollars” argument is a financial recasting of the “sweat of the brow” concept which has been definitively rejected by the courts.
Right - this is my hangup too. Look what happened during COVID - 3 trillion dollars were printed. 200 Billion of which went directly to citizens, and the remaining 2.8 trillion were in the form of loans to massive corporations (who didn't need them) that somehow magically were forgiven.

I think just forgiving 2.8 trillion dollars in "loans" to people who didn't need loans in the first place causes a shit ton of inflation.

One side of the political aisle got so angry about that 200 billion to the point that they were only willing to go along with it if their party leader got to put his name on those checks. Yet the 2.8 trillion that went to already profitable corporations (or to fraudulent citizens) went along without a peep from anyone who makes any sort of decision in Washington DC.

All this completely fucked up the M2V (Monetary Velocity) chart, because giving lots of people who won't use it quickly really hurts the economy. When the velocity of money is high, the economy works for everyone, not just wealthy people.
This is actually sort of brilliant, because Russia has been unwilling to cross the line of bombing nuclear reactors in their efforts to terrorize Ukraine's electrical grid.

So replace every thermal plant in Ukraine with a mini-nuclear generator!
why wouldn't they be copyrightable? is it a discovered versus written thing?
You don't employ a team of SRE's with the sole day-job of git maintenance though, your existing SRE/sysadmin team manages it.

And any large business will already be doing Backups, DR etc for their existing systems.
Relatedly the JVM specification section 4.4.5 says (as the same holds for the cp and stack):

In retrospect, making 8-byte constants take two constant pool entries was a poor choice.
Seeing as society is mostly cashless here, what else should you rely on if not for banks?
japanese green tea contains 2-3x more coffeine than coffee but the release time is much slower and more consistent. if spikes are a problem i recommend looking into it. it's very tasty too if prepared correctly. (hojicha, roasted green tea, on the other hand has very little coffeine)
*to make *do.
> competition will drive profit margins and prices down to nothing

I strongly suspect the profit margin on ChatGPT is already pretty low!

> Markets don't pay you what something is worth, they pay what the cheapest participant is willing to sell it for.

Correction: Markets pay what companies are able to convince consumers to pay. Some products bring negative value to the buyer, but are still sold for hundreds of millions of dollars (see: enterprise sales and integrations, which oftentime fail).
That's because if the game is GPU bound (as opposed to CPU bound) any desktop GPU from tge last decade blows the Switch GPU out of the water.
It adds the substance of communicating to me that the poster's about as fed up as I am with treating the "dickfucks" with respect. On this and several other market-regulation topics.
Why isn’t MySQL using my index?
No, it was because they had to go talk to their expert on a taxes, accounting for my company details. You can't put this kind of thing in documentation or some form based thing.
Perhaps many of the decision makers have their compensation tied to short-term results.
My parent comment already addresses your point. It is amazing you can't see that.

There are two questions:

Is it a measure? Undoubtedly.

Is it reasonable? Well, how'd you define reasonable? Would you say that if A is reasonable for something, and B is better than A for the same thing, then from "A is reasonable" follows "B is reasonable"? I would. So if you can claim a person to be a fool and another person to be smart based on some interaction and consider both statements to be reasonable, and if you concede that IQ would better (on average) predict that kind of stuff than you, therefore you should consider IQ a reasonable metric of intelligence. (But you don't, so I suspect you're not good at logical reasoning)
>are people really this devoted to corps or are they shills?

I think a lot of people defend this because they themselves work for tech companies who's products or services are also profitable due to some for of rent-seeking which ensure great profits and wages that wouldn't be possible otherwise because let's face it, the most profitable SW companies where the HN audience most likely works at, don't sell you a lifetime license to their product on a CD for a flat fee anymore like it's the '90s but are most likely subscription-ware.

It is indeed a bit hypocritical to criticize automakers for doing the same thing that beloved tech companies are doing which is what makes them so profitable and yet nobody bats an eye.
IBM has been doing it for years: they sell you a multi-core machine but you only can use 1 core. You can pay to use more than one as you need:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/power9?topic=environment-capacit...
Moat is a business term coined by Warren Buffett. It's a competitive advantage that isn't easily overcome and allows a company to earn high margins.

I don't think there are any examples in the context of AI. As the post says, no one in the AI space has a moat right now.