skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Personally, I don't think it ever will as long as we're trying to mix human drivers with automated drivers using existing infrastructure. Seems like if it was 100% automated with a system for communication between vehicles to "ask" to change lanes of the cars around it, then we'd be a lot better off than having the car "guess" what a human is attempting to do.
This goes back a long way: "In the Republic, Plato argues that poets have no place in an ideal state. They spread misinformation and corrupt the youth's minds. [...] The reasonable, the Guardians in the Republic, should rule the state."

https://www.thecollector.com/plato-philosophy-republic-poetr...

Or, in comics: https://existentialcomics.com/comic/233
Lots of “Tesla FSD Beta almost killed me” in the comments here but then I see hundreds of videos like this: https://youtu.be/Mj6vXnEYAUg

I choose to believe my eyes, it seems like FSD Beta can see almost everything a human sees. In fact in the latest version I don’t think I’ve found a single example of it missing something clearly visible to a human.

It’s planning needs some work, it seems to lack longer term planning, frequently putting itself in positions where it needs to do 3-4 quick consecutive lane changes. You may hate Elons politics, but the FSD Beta has been released to 100k+ Tesla owners and it’s not inconceivable that no one will be in the drivers seat in the next 5 yrs.

Edit: as mentioned in the comments below FSD can’t handle parking lots which is annoying because that was the one place I hoped it would work the most.
Same here. Too expensive after the pricing change and their browser is irredeemably buggy. I gave them a chance.

On to neeva.
It's excessively cautious until it drives you under a semi trailer and decapitates you.
Don't overlook the earlier books like Norwegian Wood, Wild Sheep Chase, and The Elephant Vanishes. Easier reading than the thick books and fun and beautiful.
They literally provide sources for those claims. I have no idea how you can say with a straight face that they're dishonest. They're very clear and transparent about how their plans are limited.

It's also extremely easy to check what your usage is for the current month and get a monthly overview. If you happen to use more than the 200 searches for the standard plan, they charge 1.5 cents per search. If you blow past it and end up using another 500 searches, which matches the $10 plan, you're still only paying $12.5.

They also provide soft and hard limits to how many searches you can use to avoid unexpected charges.

Like, I honestly don't know what else you expect them to do.

edit: Also, for reference, as a heavy user who basically lives in their search engine, my total searches for previous months are: 786, 782, 610, 519, 717.
The image one was what I had in mind as well. Looks like they've updated the documentation with code snippets to help people out a little more, but back when I first did it, those docs were SLIM
Check the homepage: https://web3dsurvey.com

Instead of direct JavaScript includes I now recommend just putting it in an iframe and I share example code on the homepage.

This lets me still update the script while also ensuring it can not access cookies or other things in the main page context.

What do you think?
Hmm… I just bought one but I notice their page has a quote of customer praise saying they can no longer sleep without one. That seems a little bit troubling
Well, if you subtract time for all the necessities, you get about 15h per day left. If you take 1h of that for walking, that's >5% of lifetime, which is significantly more than reduction in life expectancy from being overweight.
Seems personal freedoms are being restricted at an all time high in the country who values freedom the most. I would hope this eventually rallies people from both sides of the political spectrum, civil liberties are the bastion of a free and democratic country.

When it comes to liberties that affect one self, it should be a no brainer, government has no business there. When it comes to liberties that one person doing something can impact negatively others, than courts and legislation can come into play to make sure everyone's liberties are upheld, but honestly I'm seeing much too many things being taken up here, the bar for harm to others should be pretty high, it should follow a similar reasonable doubt process as criminal charges, you should show harm without reasonable doubt.
My IDE supports enough lines of code for 99% of jobs!
Sure. But you can’t let the assholes distract from the miracles. That goes for everything in life. If you look at what AI does today and what it did 10 years ago, we are clearly living in the future dude. It’s better than I dreamed it could be, and I’m super excited to see what the non assholes do next.
This is a key thing that people often forget. Very similar to the shenanigans that social platforms pull on tracking of people that do not use their platforms.

The collateral damage to these types of decisions are invisible to the one actually using the thing causing the damage, and it is very hard to convince that it is real
Well, of course... but if they're relying on court orders how is exactly blockchain technology helping in this process?
Would xterm against xcb be faster?
There is, but it’s not a replacement for actually calling people and performing news-gathering.

Articles sourced from Twitter threads and TikTok videos do not provide anything resembling objective reporting.
Well, I can't speak to Chinese as I don't speak it even a little.

But if that's a claim that Chinese has no tenses, I guess it somewhat comes down to what you consider a tense, then. Because if it's just about forms of a verb, I'd have to say that English has no future tense, for example, leaving us with probably... three tenses? Present (do), past (did), progressive (doing).

But nothing I've read treats tense that way.
super wide AXI-Stream busses?
True, there definitely seem to be some that this article overlooks. The difference in number seems large, somehow. Like—I can name 10+ chess prodigies that are currently living. Maybe I'm just not looking hard enough philosophy wise.
> But there is nothing stopping you from transferring these keys to a different device if you wish.

Importantly, I don't think there's a single implementation of Passkey that actually allows this. In theory you could move your keys but in practice, there is no way to transfer your private keys off of your phone.

There's also nothing in the spec that forces any provider to allow transfer, so I don't expect that to change any time soon. And even if you can transfer your keys (which you can't) there's also nothing in the spec other than "please don't do this" language that stops a site from using attestation to restrict sign-in from other devices that you've transferred your keys to.

It is very locked down right now.
I was more talking about their search. It was fine, but it wasn't worth the money for me. The browser didn't really pique my interest on release but I wouldn't expect it to be great on release (they're still a small company, but they're doing some really ambitious stuff which is cool)
No mentions of Excel? I still haven't found better spreadsheet software...
I don't own a Tesla, but if I refused to buy any product with misleading marketing, I'm not sure I'd ever buy anything more sophisticated than a loaf of bread. Then again, I also don't use any driver assist features beyond parking sensors and don't expect to see any actual autopilot within my lifetime, so maybe I just haven't been as annoyed by Tesla's nonsense. Regardless, for a purchase most people regard as rather significant, it doesn't seem unreasonable to expect them to look at least marginally beyond a marketing misnomer.
Maybe that's one of the things you can get in the Nokia chassis hacking device floating around?
If anyone is interested in type-level programming, I've been doing quite a lot of that on the Michigan TypeScript YouTube channel -> one video every day since January.

We also have had some really great guests on the show, one of which, coincidentally is Gabriel Vernaud, the guy behind "Type-Level TypeScript" which was on just _today_. What good timing!
A wild sheep chase is probably my second favorite after HBW+EOW.

I've not read Norwegian Wood but have watched the film adaptation of it, which I found a bit disappointing. I'm sure the read is much better.
Traditional workflow systems are often used for specific types of business processes, particularly those that are async like human-in-the-loop.

Temporal, while it uses the "workflow" terminology, is a new type of thing. At a basic level, it's "do you want your backend code to run reliably?" If yes, and you're okay with the latency hit of each step getting persisted for you, then the answer is "use Temporal to write your backend code." It's a new programming model that lets you develop at a higher level of abstraction, where you don't have to be concerned about faults in the hardware or network or downstream services/3rd party APIs being temporarily down. Where you no longer have to code retries, timeouts, use task queues, or use a message bus to communicate between services. And oftentimes don't even need to use a database.
Sincere question: why do we consider "news" objective in this context? By any other measure it isn't.

Edit: getting a lot of down votes but not a lot of discussion below. This isn't just a "whatever maaaaaan I'm not a part of this system" post. It's also not a thinly veiled attempt to push a political view. I really am talking about objectivity.

For example, even among publications that share my general bias, it is easy to identify that they are omitting information that could be relevant in the name of cohesion and persuasion.

I am not willing to ascribe a certain motive for it because there is truthfully a lot of potential motivations. But that doesn't change the fact that the bias exists, and we cannot call it objective as a result.
Maxima it's the continuation of Macsyma.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macsyma
PacWest weighs its options, sending bank shares in a tailspin
> In fact in the latest version I don’t think I’ve found a single example of it missing something clearly visible to a human.

Is this from personal experience of using FSD Beta or are you relying purely on YouTube videos to assess its performance? Because not everyone drives around recording videos for YouTube.
AWS is clamping down on managers’ freedom to hire in latest leak
I imagine that acclimation phenomenon is neurological, as the same thing happens with background sound
And easy to share.
> have browsed magazines or watched VHS/betamax with the same content.

Who was this guy with stacks of new magazines on demand to say nothing of thousands of VHS/betamax to go through. /g

HN needs to discuss these matters with a bit more honesty:

Porn consumption is driven by the dopamine reward system. Porn is not music. You can listen to a song a zillion times (if you like it) but a specific item of pronography will very rapidly fail to arouse in repeated viewing. New material is required.

Another aspect of porn consumption is that this 'need for variety' also creates plateaus at the content genre. Stronger material is required, progressively.

And strength in porn is not a mere matter of explicitness (which also plateaus in a given genre). Taboos and norms operate at this level, when the genre gets stronger, which by the perverse inherent mechanics of how porn and male brains interact, it must get more subversive.

So, yeah, back in the day you could get your Playboy at the 7 eleven but other materials required a visit to dodgey quarters. You also paid substantially for the privilege. And kids most certainly did not have access to hard porn. So at say 20 bucks a pop for DVD (2 hours of happy time max?) or close to 10 for a magazine (these are 20th century dollars btw) not that many people were even practically capable of getting hooked on porn. It could not even happen.

Today you have free porn on tap, and algorithms (based on well understood mechanics of porn by its peddlers) that continually goade you into 'stronger' content.
For desktop I personally use:

https://github.com/arachsys/totp

It is a very simple application that can be reviewed quickly. I use it from a separate local account that does nothing else to make it at least a bit more second factor-y than a different application in the same account as the browser. You could use the scrypt utility on the data and "scrypt dec data.enc | ./totp" to get the TOTP.
Turing Machine - The Most Important Machine That Was Never Built
I remember years ago seeing videos/posts about how much safer the Tesla was as far as build qualities. I don't know if those are still there, but surely they have been watered down with all of the software so the overall rating of the car is much less.
The Making of Jackie Kennedy
Google employees complain about CEO's pay raise as cost cuts hit company
Your privacy can't be retroactively taken: Kagi does not store your search history. The only search history you have is local, your own web browser.
> I posted above because the comments went from about 25 discussing the merits of the substack link that was posted to 2-3 that basically said "this is great I want it".

... just because the top-level comment is flagged the replies to it don't disappear. They were and are still there. (Indeed, people continued to discuss there after the top-level was flagged)

Also, merit aside, the presentation & substack link aren't even about the vaccine that was approved. If someone posts links to a "presentation on the vaccine" (direct quote) and a blog post about it, it really should be about the vaccine the submission is about, should it not?
> I think it will replace Vulkan

I do not expect this to happen at all. WepGPU (including its shading language) is a subset of Vulkan. Furthermore, it is up to the runtime to expose vendor extensions to the code (as one example, Node supports ray tracing, but nothing else does). This means that WebGPU will be perpetually behind Vulkan.

That being said, if WebGPU does what you need then don't bother with Vulkan.
Revolving Doors: Learning the Illumos Doors API
One should really look both ways before stepping out onto the road though =)
The same reason why petting zoos exist. The thrill and experience of getting so close to something exotic.
SSH-AGENT-KEEPALIVE – A bash_profile mod that cacches agent env for reuse
I am a die-hard iterm + tmux user and often have many login shells open spread across many iterm windows/tabs, tmux sessions/windows/panes, etc.

I was tired of dealing with the pain of ssh-agent so I wrote some bash scripting that caches the agent environment, kills any extra uncached agents and automatically "attaches" to the cached environment so you don't have to type your ssh key passphrases in over and over.

Feel free to contribute, also feel free to talk trash :)
The technology is there. Waymo and Cruise have been testing self-driving cars in various US cities for years, and putting thousands of engineering hours into safety. You can take a driverless ride in a Waymo in Pheonix right now.

The problem with Tesla is that it was a rushed system built on the whim of a 50 year old nepo baby, and that real safety requires holistic sensor suites that include LIDAR and RADAR, as well as a fuck load of redundancy, in addition to cameras, which is the only thing Teslas have.
Why Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs Matters
There is a nice diagram on this page for those wanting a bit more of a visual overview:

https://developers.yubico.com/Passkeys/How_passkeys_work.htm...
It does seem very same. The studio still benefits if the AI makes their writers more efficient, they just have to pay them their normal salary.
You can find them at the "lists" link at the bottom of HN.

https://news.ycombinator.com/lists
Frankly, it is 1 script away. GPT-4 + a self-feeding script is conscious (obviously). Just not as conscious as a human being (but much more conscious than a sleeping human being).
ReMatter | Full Stack Engineer | Remote | Full-time | https://rematter.com

Our mission is to enhance the sustainability, resilience, and robustness of the global metal supply chain while minimizing its carbon footprint. ReMatter is a scrap metal recycling software company founded by Forbes 30 Under 30 Stanford grads, building modern solutions for the $100B+ scrap metal industry.

Our stack includes TypeScript, React, Node, GraphQL, AWS (Lambda, Cognito, S3, RDS), GitHub Actions, and Docker. Experience with our stack is a plus, but we believe in your ability to learn new technologies quickly.

Join us to create a meaningful impact on the lives of recyclers. We offer competitive salary, meaningful equity, flexible schedules, remote work, and engaging company events. Apply at: https://rematter.com/jobs?ashby_jid=a55462d8-70d8-42ca-9c80-...
I have a 2023 Rav4 with lane assist and adaptive curise control. these "AI" or simple self driving features are really showing me the fallibility of self driving.

the car panics at silly things, and is entirely too aggressive with braking.

Its also quite daft in the times when it just wont use braking like going downhill in adaptive cruise control, the car will not use brakes to stay within the speed limit when going downhill. It will just beep really annoyingly (no it cant be turned off). but if a car in front of it starts slowing down it will be quite happy to heavily slam the brakes on (nothing dangerous, just that its either on or off.. it wont graduate the application).

I know Tesla's version is an order of magnitude better but i can easily see how it can be fooled or do the wrong thing.
I wouldn't trust it un attended.
> It looks like Woz is not scared of Tesla’s “hardcore litigation” team, which has been a bit trigger-happy when it comes to suing people for defamation lately.

Anyone can expand?
> To explain the idea to a child, I would focus on the principal idea: whether finite or infinite, a number is even when it can be divided into pairs. For finite sets, .....

Pretty sure if I tried to explain this to my kid niece she'd just say: "I'm uncomfortable. Can I go now?"
1. It’s an organized unincorporated territory of the United States.

2. It is neither a state nor a colony (it is an organized, unincorporated territory of the United States).

3. Citizens of Puerto Rico are American citizens, so yes. The existence of the insular cases doesn’t negate that - there are other categories of U.S. citizens who don’t receive the full protection of the constitution.

4. They do not. If and when Puerto Rico becomes a state, they will.
The GP didn't say they're lying about the number, the claim was that the number isn't representative of the amount of Google searches Kagi users are likely to perform.
Thanks, I felt similar last time I used it. Wasn’t magic like I remember Google being.

I wonder what happened to Google?

My theory is maybe their own systems have become too complex for them to understand and tune now. But they’ve invested so heavily into “AI” they don’t known where else to go in order to fix it ?

I’ve here seen or experienced a search product quite like Google used to be. It truly felt like magic in it’s day.
"Kagi shopping results have no affiliate links and feature the most helpful, unbiased reviews."

This is a breath of fresh air. Ever since CNN Underscored started being a thing, I've grown to dislike more and more the swamp of affiliate link promoting content.

Some concent creaters on YouTube for example (like randomfrankp), are able pull it off, but deeply affects the credibility of most content.
Interestingly, “highlights” is not there.
> So can a large FPGA be somehow used to brute force encryption?

Yes and no. It is usually possible to use an FPGA to build a specific logic circuit that will run some particular algorithm faster than the algorithm would run on a general-purpose CPU. (By a factor of maybe 2x to 100x. It varies a lot depending on the algorithm.)

It is also the case that if you implement that algorithm on a dedicated custom chip it can always be designed to run faster than the equivalent FPGA.

So if you really want maximum speed, spend the megabucks for dedicated silicon.

That said, modern GPUs and DSP chips might be able to run some algorithms almost as fast as dedicated silicon and faster than FPGAs. So maybe you don't need megabucks. Again, it depends on the algorithm.

In any case you'd need many orders of magnitude of speedup to usefully brute-force a modern crypto algorithm, and the most you'd get even from dedicated silicon is about three. Useful speedup requires quantum computers -- which don't yet exist -- and even quantum computers will only help break asymmetric crypto, not symmetric crypto.
As long as the highway has half-decently painted lines. I can drive from London to Toronto without having to “drive.” It will get angry if my hand is off the wheel though so I just keep them there and feel the car making every curve and such.

It will slow if traffic slows then speed back up. It’ll do stop and go traffic without me touching a pedal. It does curves better than I ever expected it to. Any curve you find on a highway it’ll handle. It can do some off-ramps if they’re not super tight. But I don’t generally trust it to do those.

I don’t trust it on non-divided country roads so I don’t really try. And it turns itself off fully if there’s too much rain or snow.

I test drove a Mazda… 5? Whatever the comparable is, and a Honda CRV and their systems didn’t come close. Couldn’t even tell if the Mazda’s was enabled. The CRV bounced from line to line in the lane. They use radar and a single tiny camera. EyeSight uses two big stereo cameras which I guess is the difference.
Gergo and I are working on a new implementation of the Mu compiler that uses GHC up to Core; from which we translate to the legacy Mu bytecode format.

The original Mu compiler is not designed for separate compilation, our new version is, based on GHC's binary representation of compiled interfaces with unfoldings.
We've been living in the future since the 1950s. We put men on the moon. We have the microwave oven. We have supercomputers small enough to fit in your pocket. We've mapped the genomes. We've almost had the year of the Linux desktop, we've almost had fusion in 10 years. Now we're really close to almost having AI for 10 years?

Living in the future is just such an odd comment to me. I get your enthusiastic about it, but what you consider futuristic is different than what I would consider.
"There are several paragraphs of warnings and disclaimers both on the sales page and when you use the product that exactly explain the limitations, but I absolutely insist on fixating on this one particular word. Nothing else matters."

Planes have autopilot too. It doesn't mean the pilot turns it on then goes and takes a nap. They still have to be alert.
That does not make sense for robotaxi.
That headline tho...
The title of the article though is "the beginning of the end of the password." Google seems to be making it clear here that they eventually want to get rid of other login methods, they just don't think it's mature enough yet for them to do so.

I don't see any indication that Google is looking at Passkeys as just a faster way to log in without a password. They want to eventually replace passwords entirely.
5G Base-Station-on-a-Chip Company EdgeQ Closes $75M in Series-B Funding
What's the problem with AI, and why is it nonsense?
Is there a rate limit for the paid API [1] too?

[1] https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-3-5
Newly released documents show Biden having a different take on energy consumption (when his son's foreign business partners were involved, at least).

Some of these crypto bros should marry into the Biden tribe, it seems the most efficacious way to get things done.