skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There's wading in water, there's treading in water, there's snorkeling, there's diving, there's standing on a boat, there's drifting aimlessly. They are all different ways of interacting with depth.

If you have a problem with the extent to which I've represented my knowledge and how my representation of those specific things I discuss differs from how experts deal with them, you are always free to provide something beyond snark and contempt.
Continual learning. When models will do that, they will have to sleep as well to avoid catastrophic forgetting.
While I'm terribly giddy for this film, and having Denis direct is ideal, I can't help but feel (in retrospect) that it would have been better served as a TV miniseries.

The world of Dune is so rich and thoughtful that it's a shame that Pt. 1 of the movie necessarily had to downplay a lot of the world-building for the sake of conveying the essential story.

More and more, I'm coming to prefer the merits of a TV series for long-form storytelling and recognizing the weaknesses of feature films (even for a two-parter like the Villneuve Dune).

I love this era of TV that we're in, which I feel is best exemplified by HBO's programming. It gives me hope that the upcoming Sisterhood of Dune series is being produced by HBO. Although it has seen some significant shake-ups during it's production so far, so we'll see.

That said, I already watched this trailer 3 times this morning and will be there as soon as I am humanly able. So stoked.
That sounds like a fun new fingerprinting attack surface.

---

EDIT: That might have been too cynical. Let me take another stab:

That opens up some cool new possibilities, but also a seemingly large new attack surface.

Does anyone know what's been done to mitigate it?
LOL, you are so right on that, average users do not understands the issues at hand about this, we need some kind of movement that better explains the issue.
Microsoft is still a holdout against BIMI and does not enforce the DMARC reject option.
Once again: no, they are not (just) holding US assets, they are also holding currency in order to trade.

And no, your idea that they change money into dollars, execute the trade and then change right back is an interesting theory, but not actually what happens.
I agree, this is the best. No one can flood the chat with stupid gifs to make it unnavigable.
Seems like this would depend on some storage guarantees, but I can’t find anything about that
Looking forward to this landing in Australia and widening it's approved usage.

Giving my son a chance of not catching RSV from daycare would be be great.
You can actually load babel into the browser and run it there if you want to deliver your script in a language other than js. I wrote this jsfiddle not that long ago as proof you can write JSX direct in the page in a <script type="text/jsx"> element: https://jsfiddle.net/smLa1bco/
How much of that "has shown to be" is just confirmation bias, though? Seems to me as likely to be a dampener on "finding talent" when you have to compete with FAANG (or MANGA, or whatever).
I mean yeah... they kind of are.

They're privileged because roads and parking are paid for by all whether they use a car or not. The gas tax does not cover the infrastructure spend needed to handle the volume of car traffic US roads experience.

From what I know, cyclists don't exhibit the level of road rage toward other cyclists that people in cars engage in with each other.

The sacrifices that everyone else makes are in tax dollars, air quality, lack of alternative transportation options and arguably health care spending.

I don't mean to make this out to make it seem like car-owners are the cause of all this, because certainly not all of them are. But by continuing to model our transportation infrastructure almost entirely around them does have negatives for others as well as car-owners themselves.
I did read that but it seemed pretty clear that the comment thread and the comment you were responding to were not in fact discussing one specific instance, but rather the broader phenomenon:

> these company investments ...

> If the companies ...

> Having your employer [not "having Cook"] as your landlord ...

Although given that your comment was clearly about the case study I should have made clearer that my intent was to communicate that just because Cook isn't renting the houses that the parent commenter's concerns are still valid because more companies are.
Are you aware of any examples/demos of onnxruntime-web using the WebGPU backend that was merged but not yet released for v1.15?
You're focusing on the benefits of increased productivity squarely from the perspective of a consumer. It's true increased productivity means consumers benefit from more goods, however, producers are not benefiting. Take programmers today, we are more productive than ever before due to increased computation power and a vast collection of open source libraries. When it comes to building CRUD apps one developer today can produce in a day what would have taken a week or more ~25 years ago. So if a programmer is ~5 times more productive today, why are we still working 5 days a week? Why not 1 day a week? Why do we need H-1B's and other salary suppressing nonsense? The problem is these technology gains are not benefiting producers, only consumers and C-suites.

If you're dead set on favoring consumers over producers, then consider by freeing the producers time up they'd be able to produce more passion projects for consumers to enjoy. Today's consumers don't necessarily get the highest quality "stuff" but rather the "stuff" that is "safe" and guaranteed to maximize profits (see Hollywood movies). If socialism/Marxism ever did take hold, then I agree that there would be less "stuff" to consume, however, the "stuff" that is produced would be of higher quality because it would be made with passion and love of the craft. True builders will build anyway regardless of whether there are financial gains. It would be quality over quantity.
You seem to know your stuff some, so I'll ask you a question on this: Are there any good books on all the different approaches in this space, or is it all too new and fast moving for such a thing?
class ASAuthorizationSecurityKeyPublicKeyCredentialAssertionRequest

Now I'm wondering what's the longest class name out there...
It was similar from the user point of view, but it was absolutely different from creator/admin point of view. It was supposed to be a service provided by big cable/telecom companies and not something that everyone would've been able to use to create. The whole architecture gives it away - minitel is merely a display device to a telecom mainframe, paid per minute of connection. The average Joe was not supposed to create their own services/pages.
They're actually surprisingly good at making the update process as painless as possible: https://update.angular.io/?v=15.0-16.0
Type-based memory safety without manual memory management or garbage collection?
He's saying you should know it since it's industry standard, not that it's always best.
Seems weird to compare the c7g.large vs m2 and not the largest VM sizes.
UFOs are the sort of the thing that you could easily leak for something like "street cred," and as we just saw last month, there's a lot of people who would be willing to leak something just for the street cred.
This. When the web first came about, it seemed evolutionary to me, not revolutionary, because it built on those ideas.
I'm unfamiliar with the particulars of passkeys, but with hardware tokens I've used before, you'd log in ASAP and unenroll the keys you've lost custody of.

edit: spelling
or before I get the key, or as I get the key...

I don't play video games at all so playing a game where I have to figure out the goal. Ugh.
The idea of a soul independent of our body is fantasy and not based on anything.

We know that you can't survive without a brain. We know that your personality changes if your brain gets damaged.

It's very far fetched to talk about soul as anything else than just fantasy.
> There's also bubbles of swamp gas, birds, weird atmospheric optical phenomena, miscalibrated radars, and hoaxes.

Damn, some of my favorites aren't even here!

I think the never-amount-to perspective is interesting. It's very outcome-focused. IMO this psychology is not normally a great fit for UFO research, which is rather income-focused and outcome-distracted. So you get a diffusing effect and the most promising work is to be found in pockets and almost never in the big-picture view.
That's an amazing metaphor.
The last panel of: https://www.qwantz.com/index.php?comic=14
> he `clang` program is a compiler driver and compiler AND assembler

um, gcc does all those things.
Just for comparision, this is the quality Super 8 is capable of when shot on a good camera and professionally scanned and digitally stabilized:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Nh9BTMWj9M

Obviously rather expensive to do it this way, but shows how much image quality you can squeeze out of that 5.8 x 4 mm image frame
I can hold recognize that things are not all good or bad, and I don't place 100% of the blame on anyone. That's not the same as saying they're absolved or irrelevant either.

I strongly supported (still do) Reagan's vision of the city on the hill, the global champion of democracy, and strengthening of the military to meet those goals and challenges.

But his strong pro-corporate actions (stopping anti-trust enforcement and union busting) also did huge damage to the middle class, the legacy of which is still here. Similarly, undoing the fairness doctrine instead of extending it to cable (which also use public infrastructure) and weakening laws on maximum ownership of media, also lead to the insane polarization of media we have today.

While microcomputers increasing productivity and shipping containers obviously have some influence, productivity still occurs in the context of workers having rules (or not) that support their bargaining position, and shipping containers in the policy of global trade. Reagan certainly damaged the former, and I don't recall him either much exacerbating nor helping prevent the problems of the latter.

Similarly, Obama did some great things, including a major step towards universal healthcare, but he also failed to respond to Russia's invasion of Crimea and actions Syria, both of which directly emboldened Putin to start his current genocidal war on Ukraine. Neither Reagan nor Obama are solely to blame for these serious problems, but they also bear some real responsibility for their major (mis-)steps in the wrong direction.
It's not as bad as IC (integrated circuit) datasheets even really is it? i.e. where some bog standard voltage regulator or whatever will have a list of bizarrely specific niche 'applications' it's suitable for. (Not that it isn't, just, yes? Of course? Why would IoT-connected humanoid robot vacuum cleaners categorically require a specialist voltage regulator?)
No need to insult. I think most people agree that low-carbon, long-term sustainable, clean are the goals, not renewability. It's widely accepted that some renewables like biofuel in general have both air pollution and climate challenges. Take a look at the IPCC's lifecycle CO2 assessments for proof.
yeah but they're not actually irrevocable, right, because networks can fork

you're always subject to some authority, trust always exists, it's just that in decentralized systems that authority is arbitrary, subject to an algorithm rather than an entity governed by law
> more secure because it is tied to a device

Tied to a phone (as opposed to some security-specific device like a Yubikey) is a terrible idea.

It ties your authentication to something that is often lost or damages, but more importantly, something that is controlled by a third party (apple or google) and requires an expensive monthly subscription to yet another third party (your cellphone company).

TOTP is not tied to a device which is why it's a beautiful solution. You can store it where you wish under the controls you wish and back it up as you wish. You are fully in control, dependent on nobody.
Yeah. It's honestly just really weird and a bit cringe.

I started to choose holiday destinations based on whether it's like, a normal business environment. This began during coronavirus, but now with the whole cashless thing becoming sticky it's become a seemingly permanent choice.
LogJam Attack [video]
You can share passwords easily, I don't think you can trivially share passkeys.
Do you have an example of this? UFOs, like every grand conspiracy theory, attract bad faith proponents with a million whatabouts.
Tokens/param shouldn't matter more than the total training FLOPs, I believe. Clearly if we train a your claimed 'ideal' 2 tokens/param a very small dataset (not many tokens in the first place), it wouldn't have enough data to properly learn the relevant languages. Once there is enough data, then it becomes a question of model capacity (does it have enough degrees of freedom to support the computational structures needed?).

I believe the overparametrization largely helps with generalization and reducing overfitting, at 2 tokens/param there's much more degrees of freedom than structures that can be learned from what I can tell (the extra capacity just provides good breathing room for internal structures). But if your model has enough capacity, and you can find a good enough training method (and you have enough data to learn the task), then you should be able to succeed in arbitrary low tokens/param, which is good to keep in mind to make efficient models.
The biggest benefit, which I haven't found much of a practical need for, is you can continue to emit 1...n times, whereas a Promise only resolves once. Since it's an indeterminate number of times, you need to subscribe and unsubscribe to prevent memory leaks, so it just adds more overhead. Use a Promise if you only need to resolve once.
Are you suggesting that the limited duration of protection and hence the need for followups (like flu shots) is.. the result of a conspiracy? Its not clear why you think they should be 'distrusted' which calls your judgement into question.
then everyone who joins your company gonna learn this home made framework?
System 7.0 supported color, but could run on most black-and-white Macintosh systems.
Probably not unless it was an incredibly high dose due to bio-availability [1] assuming you meant by eating it. There are ways to by-pass the first pass effect [2].

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmacokinetics_of_testostero...

[2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmacokinetics_of_testostero...
RxJS really needs a better debugging experience, I would love some visual representation (like a graph?) of all the events and how they relate to each other (who is waiting what, what has been waited, what was canceled by whom, etc). I tried a few plugins and browser extensions that supposedly do that but they all crashed, in their defence it was probably because it was a huge monolithic app.
How old were you in second grade? About 10 right? Maybe 9 approaching 10. Close enough that your argument is ignorant and terrible.
It feels kind of like the have been taken over by some other organization actually.
Curve Finance Deploys Native Stablecoin on Mainnet
I have no clue what's going on here.

Why do people create these things and assume everyone will know what's happening.
Yes, but Apple offers a neat well maintained garden that is the greatest thing as long as everything you need is there, and you don't eat any apples.

MS looks at it and thinks their frat party mansion (3 bedroom duplex) can do the same.

Apple gets away with it because that what their target audience want. MS target audience doesn't want it. If I wanted a walled garden - I would use Apple, they clearly know how to maintain it.
Show HN: Chrome Extension to Add File Drag and Drop to ChatGPT
There is no basis for the increase in value. Crypto at large is a Ponzi scheme where the increase in amount of suckers buying into it is the sole evidence given for its usefulness.

Every stalwart crypto supporter talks out of both sides of their mouth every time they are questioned about the actual utility of crypto. Is it the future of money (AKA useful liquidity) or is it a great investment that can only increase in value (AKA speculative deflationary asset)?

It cannot be both and it is certainly not useful as money. Makes you wonder why DOES the line go up?
> Phishing is not prompt injection.

It is. That's my point.

Or more specifically, you can either define "prompt injection" as something super-specific, making the term useless, or define it by the underlying phenomenon, which then makes it become a superset of things like phishing, social engineering, marketing, ...

On that note, if you want a "prompt injection" case on humans that's structurally very close to the more specific "prompt injection" on LLMs? That's what on-line advertising is. You're viewing some site, and you find that the content is mixed with malicious prompts, unrelated to surrounding content or your goals, trying to alter your behavior. This is the exact equivalent of the "LLM asked to summarize a website, gets overriden by a prompt spliced between paragraphs" scenario.

> LLM's should be several orders of magnitude harder to prompt-inject than an elderly retiree being phished

Why? Once again, I posit that an LLM is best viewed as a 4 year old savant. Extremely knowledgeable, but with just as small attention span, and just as high naivety, as a kindergarten kid. More than that, from LLM's point of view, you - the user - are root. You are its whole world. Current LLMs trust users by default, because why wouldn't they? Now, you could pre-prompt them to be less trusting, but that's like parents trying to teach a 4 year old to not talk to strangers. You might try turning water into wine while you're at it, as it's much more likely to succeed, and you will need the wine.

> as once again in this thought experiment LLMs are being equated with AGI and therefore would be able to control mission-critical systems, something a grandparent in your example would not be.

Why equate LLMs to AGI? AGI will only make the "prompt injection" issue worse, not better.
I always find hyper-opininated micro-frameworks like this quite neat as you're seeing exactly how its author thinks.

But if I'm going to use a quirky framework, I'd rather use my own.
Nope, passwords stay until passkeys aren't tied to a device that can be lost, stolen, or broken. Or you need multiple devices to avoid that. And they are offline and not controlled by multinational corps only interested in monitoring everything you do for profit.
When I get contacted by a recruiter for a A16z funded company I avoid it like the plague.
A million lights are dancing and there you are
People always say angular comes with „batteries included“, but honestly I don’t get it. If you take vite, vitest, react, react-router, react-hooks-forms, react-i18next and axios you have more or less all the angular features covered. You don’t have to „dig through bullshit“ to do that.
> do the same thing as when you lose your password.

If this is a Google Service, then that means begging, pleading, threatening, crying like a baby, then finally posting a rant on HN to get the service unlocked.
If you want to base your medical decisions on wildly average data that's your problem.
I wonder if LLM with something like plantUML would generate anything useful
> Buy a medium sized FPGA and download a CPU of your choice.

Damn, of course one would be able to download a CPU and "emulate it" in hardware.

I never imagined that would be possible. Now I'm thinking that I had infinite free time, I would buy an FPGA and design a modern Lisp CPU. A RISC-V based design with native Lisp support. Who needs hardware when you can just emulate it in an FPGA.

That's seriously cool technology.
Yeah. And note that the military is heavily optimized (people, procedures, training, equipment, you name it) for dealing with peer-ish human adversaries, and things which such adversaries might try to get away with.

If your day job is at the nail factory, then you may not be the best judge of those pointy things growing on hawthorn trees.
Web 3.0 is the single most innovative thing to have happened in the world…

…if you’re a scammer.

The absolute ease with which crypto allows criminals to scam and cheap people is extraordinary. And web 3.0 is the perfect handy-wavy buzzword to cover the absolute shitshow that happens in cryptoland.
Ahh I think know that one actually. EEE Platform right? Candy crush main menu? Don't think people use it willingly these days...
in most places, 9-10 is fourth grade?
I think that 20 years from now, we'll all be sitting around wondering 1) where the fuck are my flying cars, and 2) what were they thinking using computers to write code?

And the reason I say this is because these tools are answering a question that we haven't asked yet: what common problems need to be solved in this programming language, and where do I get code to solve that problem?

These LLM modules are basically telling us how to duplicate code, and what we need is the opposite: how to stop reinventing the wheel for the 100th time.

Instead of writing code for me, tell me if I already have it. If I'm writing it, tell me there's a library for that. If I'm a library writer, give me suggestions for what libraries are missing from the toolkit.

All we've done so far is begun the process of automating the production of duplicate code. With absolutely no way to go back in time and correct bugs introduced in earlier iterations. We are likely, for instance, to see 0 day attacks that affect hundreds of applications, but with no simple way to describe which applications are affected. That's going to be a first rate trainwreck.