skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
One could argue that older accounts are even more likely to get hacked, as they are more likely to have older passwords that are weaker that may have been leaked along the way, along with various other accumulated security issues (leaked API keys, out of date 2FA choices etc).
The most honest capitalists (e.g. some AnCaps, some neoliberals) do make this point, but it's not very common. As much as I disagree with their views, I respect their blunt honesty about the system they endorse.

What I can't stand is the disingenuous whitewashing of capitalism, which boils down to "don't trust your lying eyes" and "it's not Real Capitalism, which is actually cool and good". One can't have a productive discussion with these sorts of evangelists, much like one can't have a productive discussion with fanatical cryptocurrency fanboys who insist that ugly monkey JPEGs and The Blonkchain will magically create a perfect society, if only we just Do It Harder.

"Crony capitalism" is a thought-terminating cliche. It prevents us from discussing actually-existing capitalism.
I am not saying that the left does not get outraged. I am saying that the mainstream media has not been able to capitalize on that rage for profit. That seems to me to be more the issue than an over-saturation of the liberal perspective or a lack of over-saturation of the conservative perspective.

Talk radio and Fox news are highly popular. As I understand it, before he was fired, Tucker Carlson was the most watched news-related show.

I agree that there are popular progressive and left-leaning shows that focus on outrage (John Oliver, Jon Stewart, etc.) but as I understand it, they are not as successful or popular as Fox News and conservative talk radio.

My point was not that conservatives are more outraged than liberals (I suspect that each side sincerely believes that the other sides shows greater outrage). I just meant from a business perspective, it appears to me that the establishment cable news services are struggling to maintain audience loyalty which tells me that they are not as good as conservative media at taking advantage of audience outrage.
I see the same message on the app.

It's super unclear.

I think I signed up twice, a few months apart, because the message in the app didn't give me confidence that I'd signed up the first time.

Separately, the other day I turned right and there was a Waymo car blocking the lane, about to pick up some passengers. My car and the car behind me couldn't continue along the road until the passengers had reached the car had gotten in. They didn't seem like they were in a hurry.

Stopping a couple of extra car lengths away from the junction (or, better still, not blocking in the lane at all) wouldn't have paused other people's journeys.
AWS Cost Explorer gives a pretty good breakdown. There’s also Cost Anomaly Detection https://aws.amazon.com/aws-cost-management/aws-cost-anomaly-...
Metaverse hasn't proven utility or entertainment though?
People had been building AI for decades, with nothing to show for. Until one day they did.
I don't think you fully appreciate what the lives of research animals are like:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10130709/NIH-says-b...
Standing up and maintaining a distribution network is non trivial, especially for bulky goods that aren't practical for mail order shipping. Home Depot doesn't contract out locally sourced production like your examples do.
You should do some more research about who China is willing to imprison for political purposes.

It is absolutely not limited to Chinese citizens.
I understand the point you're trying to make but I'm not sure if you've actually proven it.

> A crypto token cannot be economically more productive

What about when ETH was upgraded to use less power? Or future upgrades to reduce transaction fees? Ditto for the other planned upgrades: https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/158866978247136870...

Unless you are arguing that the whole network is worthless, so upgrading something worthless is still worthless? Is that what you're saying?

Regarding "The reason the stock market grows is because businesses on that market grow" isn't there also an opposite scenario, where more investments (into factories, etc..) get made by companies/individuals with cash reserves during a recession because prices have come down? https://www.businessofapps.com/data/apple-data/

Using AAPL as an example, company revenue has steadily been going up since at least 2005 (with Q1 2008 being a record quarter), so why wasn't it spared during the 2008 recession? Is it not because of meme-nomics in the stock market?

Similarly, why do people say "buy on the rumor, sell on the news" if stock market reflects business reality?

> When people stop entering the system, tomorrow -- or in a decade -- the whole thing collapses

Isn't that exactly what Marx predicted of the capitalist system as a whole? I again fail to see the difference between crypto and the rest of finance. If anything, crypto, seems like a more extreme version of the traditional system (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerationism)

Also, I don't think BTC/ETH would cease to function if the prices went down. You seem to be confusing the promises made by certain charlatans with the actual utility of these assets, which is that they are inherently traceable and can be used to avoid things like this: https://www.yahoo.com/video/pentagon-35-trillion-accounting-...

And I am aware that they are not the ONLY solution to this problem, but I don't see how you can argue that they have no utility at all.
This must be a troll.
As per the article, in the past tense many people do indeed use it exactly as a separable verb.
I'm definitely rooting for Typst and other LaTeX replacements, but the factors resisting a change are massive, especially in academia. Conferences and journals all have templates in LaTex that have been built up over years or decades. The ecosystem of packages is huge. Finally, LaTeX documents look really good when done correctly. Especially in academia were paper review is a largely subjective process, something as simple as poor typesetting can spoil a reviewer's perception of the work.
I fail to see how HTMX could be the "future". It could have been something useful in the 2000s, back when browsers had trouble processing the many MBs of JS of a SPA. Nowadays SPA's run just fine, the average network bandwidth of a user is full-HD video tier, and even mobile microprocessors can crunch JS decently fast. There is no use case for HTMX. Fragmented state floating around in requests is also a big big problem.

The return of the "backend frontender" is also a non happening. The bar is now much higher in terms of UX and design, and for that you really need frontend specialists. Gone are the days when the backend guys could craft a few html templates and call it a day, knowing the design won't change much, and so they would be able to go back to DB work.
I drive a couple of times a month... It's not the most walkable city but the downtown area is fairly walkable
Get Started with React Server: Components on the Back End
It's all just a mirage. You can never avoid the Iron Law of Oligarchy: it doesn't matter what system you think you have - monarchy, democracy, anarchy, dictatorship; what you have always amounts to rule by oligarchs
I feel that oftentimes runtime metaprogramming is to make up for code that can't be written down statically. But if you have the right macros then you don't need the metaprogramming to happen at runtime. For instance, Rust has a pretty solid type system (not quite Haskell, but more intricate than Java) and lets you do things like generate serialization and deserialization code for arbitrary structs at compile time, which most languages would do at runtime by inspecting fields or something similar.

All this to say, runtime metaprogramming doesn't seem inherently more capable compared to what's possible in the more “static compiler” languages; rather, it seems like an escape hatch for when you can't generate the code you want at compile time.
Heruntergeladetes? (In contrast to Geschnetzeltes, it isn't served with Spätzle.)
Java honestly provides both, and it does it extremely well! I personally prefer to use Kotlin, but same idea.
BE-4 engine delay. It delayed New Glenn and also ULA Vulcan. Vulcan is slated to start launching Amazon Kuiper Sats. And Rocketlabs Peter Beck is saying these constellations are slated to start going up en masse starting ~2026
I never claimed there wasn’t “room” for speculation and I can’t stop people from speculating.

My comment was about the basis for such speculation - for which there is none - and a criticism of this kind of speculation due to the problems it causes.

It’s uninteresting and is often the precursor to misinformation/disinformation.
To be fair, its also easier than ever before to use spot instances.

If you set up an EKS/K8s cluster and install Karpenter. You can configure it very easily to use spot instances anytime prices are available for less than on-demand and to use on-demand when spot instances are unavailable or too expensive.

You end up never thinking about it but having full availability.

In practice it means the ceiling on your bill is the on-demand price, but you usually average out much lower.

I suspect as more and more people switch over to this model then the use of spot instances will stay closer to full saturation, with those discounts becoming negligible.
Negotiate if you’re staying for a month or more. I frequently get prices that are less than half the asking price.
Phoenix is like LA without the positives
Ruby is fine until your large application starts to include more and more dependencies. There is no coherent API across, every library has it's own mini DSL and the mess starts to build up. Then it comes method_missing, monkey patching and strings and dictionaries passing in all the places. True horror. All Ruby's readability dissapears. Small apps look beautiful, but large ones quickly become a mess. On top of that resource utilization is atrocious.
But there are places where Ruby shines like RSpec, Rails, pry in runtime (I miss that one).
In my experience (as in, I've used it multiple times in various capacities over the last decade), Scala is kind of a mess. There's just not a clear reason to use Scala over the slew of other options that solve every problem Scala solves but better or more succinctly. The existence of Kotlin, Haskell, Python and Clojure or just plain old Java all invalidate one of the narratives a developer would tell themselves before adopting Scala. It's just the less popular, harder to adopt, maybe not even technically equal option.

You also can't hire for it, which is a catch 22 for the Scala community.

Also, in my very direct personal experience, the community is pretty toxic.
It's funny because for some reason they definitely do feel adorable and polite. I know we shouldn't actively anthropomorphize them, but it's just the feeling you get when you see them go about their polite little way, adorably plotting our downfall.
Similarly, I've worn boat shoes or vans without socks since I was a freshman in high school and it's great! The only exceptions are dress shoes and when biking.
> We should have some standard for animal handling, but it's pretty dumb that we're grandfathering an industry that produces 100,000x the harm of the research labs

There're ethical standards for animal handling in meat processing industry. And yes, they should totally be improved.

> holding up potentially revolutionary medical treatment for treatment of the other .01%.

Since when calls for following basic ethical industry standards are bad thing? Especially when they go to a company owned by billionaire, who's know for "bending" the truth about capabilities of his products. Also, there's literally 0 proof for any medical treatment coming out of Neuralink and a lot of proof that they abuse animals.
I disagree with the parent post entirely. Most people in 1995 didn't know what the Internet was going to become. It was a geeky thing that most didn't use. Speeds were slow, most people thought gopher was a small rodent, etc. And for every article saying the Internet was the next big thing, there were many questioning what it would be good for.

Heck, Mosaic wasn't even in development in 1990. It was released in late 1993, and it wasn't until Navigator was released in 1994 that "browsing" became a thing. Most people before then weren't going to use an FTP site off an obscure college to DL something originally intended for X windows...

People forget how fast the Web took off at that point. From 1994 to 1999, the growth was just crazy, with improvements in features every six months.
Why put a link to the footer in the header which contains links to other pages when you can just put your links directly in the header?

I know the reason why, because it makes the page cluttered, whereas having it at the footer does a better job of hiding it. But isn't that the exact problem that the hamburger menu was made to fix?
Sam Altman says era of remote work is over
> Honestly, every sentence in there is incorrect.

The NFL's non-profit status has been contentious for years.

> Section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code specifically defines professional football leagues as exempt organizations under that section. These organizations are exempt whether or not they administer a pension fund for football players. (Irs.gov)
Kombucha chic: How one student uses microbes, and time, to grow her own clothes
I know exactly where this is from. This has been floating around the Chinese Internet for a bit. The repo is originally at https://github.com/wheatup/evil.js but has been made private since then. A few variants of this was made and uploaded to NPM.

Here's a English translation of the README.md in that specific repo.

> What? The notorious 996 company wants you to hit the road?

>

> Do you want to leave a small "gift" for your project before you go?

>

> Let's sneak this project into yours, and your project will have, but not limited to, the following magical effects:

>

> - When the length of the array is divisible by 7, Array.includes will always return false.

> - When it's Sunday, the result of the Array.map method always loses the last element.

> - There is a 2% chance that the result of Array.filter will lose the last element.

> - setTimeout will always trigger one second slower than expected.

> - 10% of Promise.then will not register on Sundays.

> - JSON.stringify will change uppercase I to lowercase l.

> - The result of Date.getTime() will always be one hour behind.

> - There is a 5% chance that localStorage.getItem will return an empty string.

see: https://juejin.cn/post/7133134875426553886
My work has completely changed over their telephony technology at least three times in 10 years. My parents had the same bakelite Western Electric phone on the kitchen wall for over three decades. Our defintion of technological advancement seems to be shorter-lived, throwaway stuff that compromises our privacy and demands frequent replacement. And the pace of obsolescence seems to be accelerating.
>This is a rather self-aggrandizing view, and I think it speaks to the level of ego that underpins a lot of the discussion on here.

I'm not so sure about that. I've read a lot of things that should have never left peer review or editing stages, while some of the most impotent papers for my field never left preprint.

Overall I think the most imprortant step of peer review is you as the reader in the field. Peer review should catch the worst offenders out, saving us all some time, but it should never be viewed as a seal of approval. Everything you read should be critically evaluated as if it were a preprint anyway.
I don't work with Cisco kit but it certainly seems like they are hostile in the support realm. Even if you buy something used and there are software patches available for it you can't get them without a support contract for example. Stories like this "something serious is wrong and Cisco says get rid of it" seem fairly common as well. They must be damn amazing at what they do because these support stories would have me looking elsewhere.
Sky was previously Razer. Cobalt is a YouTube project they use for TVs and such.
American Apparel was a clothes store. It’s not even remotely sketchy the way you’re implying
Was listening to a podcast about this a while back; it's very much a thing (though it's usually via social engineering; emailing the editor pretending to be a translator or similar). There's some mystery over _why_ people do it, IIRC; there's not much money in it.
AutoML-GPT: Automatic Machine Learning with GPT
https://www.sparkfun.com/418
I dislike eBay search, for example all of a sudden one of my daily bookmarked searches went from the usual 10 results to THOUSANDS, all of them not including my search term, this is the link:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_nkw=Tasmota&LH_PrefLoc=1&...

Why are some sellers having all their listings (car parts) included in my search for "Tasmota"?
Credit for the LLaMa derivatives (Alpaca, Vicuna etc) or for the base model? I don't see why they wouldn't deserve credit for the base model.
the 4-5C model is a fraudulent model that's been pushed for political agendas, it mistakes the temperature changes that happen as distance from the equator increases.

Realistically, the world is going to see a 1.5-1.9C increase by 2100. These are the IPCC's current projections, which is the most well known standard.

everything you say is the dogma of alarmists, its not that i don't think you care about this, I'm certain that you do, but you're working off incorrect information and its doing more harm than good.

some of the worst implications will be a biodiversity loss in places near the equator, and there is basically not much we can do to stop it. although hopefully i'm wrong as there's a lot of ecological folk trying to remediate future problems in this area.

the worst thing we can do to ourselves as a society is panic and turn all of our attention towards climate-based dogma. europe did this and russia found it as a reason to attack ukraine. in reality, we have multiple priorities that need to be sorted. climate is on there but its not the only one. its important to keep people wealthy enough to care about the climate, because otherwise they burn fuel sources that are worse for it, ie wood and coal. and we also need global societies to develop scientifically/economically so we can achieve nuclear fusion faster for the very goal that you're concerned about.

to summarize a solid policy-based strategy, and complex-web of problems concept to solve our climate problem is that:

increase in global trade -> leads to -> increase in economic prosperity -> leads to -> increase in scientific development -> leads to -> faster development of fusion

now the economic prosperity part isn't simple because there are foreign governments that are showing themselves to be hostile towards western institutions and operations, taking advantage of their own development to act maliciously. this isn't great as it makes us divert resources away from these important problems. but if we only focus on the climate the west will be eaten up by someone who doesn't care about it at all.
Things must be different here (BC, Canada). I can't think of why I'd ever rent a hotel room when AirBnB's are usually a similar price and way more comfortable (usually).

Unless I had a worry about cancellations I suppose.
No. A hodgepodge of everyone's favourite way, is the future. Always has been!

That said for my next hobby project I will probably go even simpler than HTMX, and use classic server side rendering. Then add some Vanilla JS where needed.

I keep going around in circles, but I have tried NextJS and while pretty cool there are a class of problems you need to deal with that simply don't exist in simpler apps.
Massively Parallel Coupled Discrete Unified Gas Kinetic Scheme
That's bad user research. You don't ask them what they want, you ask them what individual features are helpful (e.g. "speed", in the case of Henry Ford), and you give them some product options and ask them which one they most prefer, and why.

The top speed of a Model T was about 42 MPH, comparable to the fastest horses. So Ford wasn't delivering on this user request regardless. https://techhistorian.com/ford-model-t-top-speed/ https://horseyhooves.com/how-fast-can-a-horse-run/

While horses couldn't maintain this speed for long, horses also broke down much less frequently than the earliest cars.

Given what was state of the art at the time, I would believe that people would have asked for smaller trains that don't need a track, and not for "faster horses", if they'd been given the question. And this smaller, trackless train, is effectively what automotive manufacturers delivered.
> The Toyota Corolla, their best selling car, is being out-sold in California by Tesla. That wasn't supposed to happen.

I was given a '23 Corolla from a rental agency, and I can say it was a complete disappointment in a way that other random rentals were not.

1) No CarPlay/app integration standard.

2) Horrendous dash geometry and overall interface.

3) Incredibly annoying and non-intuitive lane-keeping alert.

Perhaps Toyota should develop cars that don't suck. Disclaimer: I have owned 4 Toyotas in the past and own an older Toyota currently. I had brand loyalty till about 10 years ago.
To my ears, the brownshirted grunts seemed to shout ''Hark, Guard!'', although it might have been ''Halt, Guard!''
Bookmarked; thanks for that link. Bonus points for sentiment analysis.
There are still plenty of employers that haven't moved to open-plan offices, at least not for engineering staff. They're just usually in 'old-fashioned' industries.
Lol. Not from New Zealand. It's like saying Burger King is Canadian now that it merged with Tim Horton's and the headquarters is in Toronto. I didn't even inject this into the conversation, I was responding to someone saying "over and over again" that it was an American company, like it matters when over 90% of it's launches are still in the country that it was founded in.
Grab Coffee with NYC Creatives
Now accepting applications.
San Francisco is the only place I know with this bizarre obsession that things shouldn’t be allowed to cast shadows on other things, as a general rule.

It’s just strange.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/SF-supervisors-...
Nice! I have used Maps often for storing arbitrary key-value pairs, but until 5 minutes ago I didn't know you could use object references as keys. So this was a very good use of 5 mins.
Is there any info which who at Meta actually worked on LLaMA? (department, team, persons, etc)
Can we build the nuclear in Montana? Our prices are going up and the local utility is buying the Washington and Oregon ownerships of a MT coal plant.
I've seen Asterix in printed form in Schwäbisch, Swabian. Also in, uh, can't recall if it was Karjalaa or Savvoo, the Carelian or Savonian dialect of Finnish. Maybe both.
Isn’t it an ethics board, not a corporate board? So very different from FB?
Just pick a lightweight web framework, and freeze the dependencies. I don't see the problem.
> institutional animal care and use committees

That's what they're talking about, not corporate governance. If you do animal experimentation, you have an independent board that reviews the protocols, etc., to ensure things are done ethically. Similar to an IRB with human experiments.

The heavy weighting towards employees isn't a sign that it was selected for its independence from the company.