skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Or purchase and pirate, which covers your morals in most cases, and puts the burden on proving your hash doesn't match your license.
> There are five countries in the whole world for the whole time which were "developing" and become "developed", such as South Korea (sorry I forgot another examples). I clearly remember that all of those were Buddhist countries.

Yes I am from a such country.

You are speaking about science in general sense, where science everything is science based, my intent by science mean "science as a tool to explain things around us, where that tool has limitations." ex: Is there anyway science could explain why a particular person born in a certain way, why a particular thing happen to specific person. I think you will say that there is always a reason, which is correct indeed, but what is the root causes that lead to that reason/s in the first place, To explain that we have to step out of this life in to Sanasara, which does not belong to realm of what we called modern science. I have heard some people misunderstand everything based on Karma, so we do not have free will but this not true according to Dhamma.

My native language is not English, so forgive me if I disrespect you in anyway since I am not fluent in subtleties of English language.
The there is a distinct disconnect between the headline, which claims that child-free adults don't regret not having children, and the quote in the article which talks about overall life regret differences between parents and non-parents.
I don't think Google has released the weights or anything outside of what is linked here, I'd love to know though.

Have you looked at YOLOv8 vs BLIP2?
From personal experience, just stick the youngest on the floor
yes thats actually it
In Hollywood Strike, AI Is Nemesis
What does that even mean in this context?

How is having kids you don't want "paying it forward?"
First and foremost, pinpoint the goal. Is it purely for funsies? To acquire new knowledge? Must it be pragmatic? Perhaps a business venture? Are there any users who will interact with the thing?

Next, break it down into steps. Write everything down like a brainstorm meeting.

This is a preliminary plan. Identify any known unknowns and research topics until they become known knowns. In the end, there is a list of steps to be done to achieve the goal. Can't crack it yet? Not a problem, put it in the reserved zone and move on.

Tackle step #1, or perhaps start with the most troubling one, then reassess the remaining parts. Is the goal still stand, or has something changed? No? Excellent--proceed. Yes? Take a half step back and adjust the plan.

Repeat.

Don’t forget to take breaks, drink water, and, please, be forgiving.
The protestors summarily killed at Tiananmen are still unjustly dead
None of that requires meaningful sacrifice in material standards of living.
> You think working class people need to murder people? You may want to seek professional help if you actually believe this.

It's called a revolution, and they have to happen from time to time for society to stay healthy. Sort if like forest fires in some biomes.
Ask HN: Go to Websites for Programmers / Hackers in 2023?
Hi HN,

Just wondering what websites you go to almost everyday (other than HN) in 2023 and why?

What do you like about it?

I'll start off with SourceHut (https://sr.ht), been using it since GitHub is getting extremely bloated and using SourceHut is a breath of fresh air for me.

What are yours? :)
Heh. That's not how these things work in practise. ;)
> Worse, in other areas like Fell St., they drive exclusively in the left hand lane while driving 15mph below the flow of traffic.

Staying in the overtaking lane is against the rules in Britain; is that the case in California too?
> I cant believe the article puts him in a class with john grisham.

I think the article is comparing their similar mass market appeal. Grisham, Koontz and King all consistently sell enough books to make them a mainstay on airport book racks.
I haven't taken a ride but I expect that Waymo/Cruise just set their current price/ride to 80% of whatever Uber etc. charge. Since that cost is just a made up number anyway as they have accepted operating at a loss.

When you take a hard look at exactly how to get the costs down to the point where that price is profitable, that must be a monumental challenge. The cars must cost maybe $100-150k more? Maintenance on the sensitive custom-fit equipment, software and operations costs, yikes.
If email had an ability to delete a message after you've sent it like every other chat platform this wouldn't have been a big issue. Unfortunately the email protocol seems to be stuck and is unable to evolve with the needs of the current times.
Google Workspace...the one that they let us beta test for free starting like a decade ago? they rolled out a free opt-in after announcing the move to discontinue the free service. here's a cropped screenshot i just took of my control panel:

https://ibb.co/nPfLRKK
Triton: Runtime for highly efficient custom Deep-Learning primitives
based on my experience with GPT-4 in coding tasks it responds extremely well to just appended raw error output text without additional explanation.
Looks nice, though it would be great if it supported ENS (and perhaps UD) domains, as they are getting increasingly common.
Nowhere. There are no tech jobs. At least none without a paycut of 50% or more in an inflationary environment. People are getting poorer every day.
Thanks. Yeah, it's honestly not a problem.
Yeah it's surreal how the political pro-life movement is intertwined with great replacement conspiracy nuts.

Like the logic makes sense but odd bedfellows.
The New York hotel destination fee scam (2020)
What is best cost effective and decent alternative to DD in 2023? I also feel like they are robbing me blind. Great product though.
Tron: Ares is coming in 2025 I’m pretty sure.
Interesting, thanks for sharing that. This has been one of the things I felt that ATP got "right", so neat to see that ActivityPub can do it, even if Mastodon doesn't.
You multiply the cost of prevention by the risk of a crash and see if it exceeds the cost of a crash.

Some plane crashes can be prevented with a $0.30 warning light. Preventing those plane crashes is optimal.

Some plane crashes can only be prevented by permanently grounding all planes, because they'll be caused by a confluence of improbable events. Trying to mitigate every implausible circumstance that could potentially lead to a crash is not optimal, even when some of them proceed to actually happen.
There is no such thing as "outside work hours" for a priest. They are to serve as a leader for their congregation, actively engaging in behavior which is contrary to that mission should absolutely be exposed.
We'd need 23 of them. Depending on the cost, it would be better than nothing. Currently, I think it costs R10 mil to generate 1MW through solar; so R70 billion with solar.
This has been our experience
How would you explain it to someone unfamiliar with Ethereum?
qryn is solid and very affordable because you self-host. it supports DD vectors out of the box. /dev/null is always a strong contender too.
>Mining is scale invariant, the value of the coins tends to the value of the energy, not the quantity. Make electricity cheaper and mining will just use more of it.

Isn't the value of mining really a function of the higher of both energy and computational availability, and, to my amateur understanding, don't most cryptocurrencies self-adjust their computational difficulty in response to more mining, which the return-value of each new miner less than the one before it? I'd wager that means the combination of time and silicon availability will cap the expansion long before it eats four-fifths of 2060 US' energy generation.

>Nuclear is simply way too expensive and by far the #1 reason it's not being built is because no one wants to write the checks to build it when solar is more than an order of magnitude cheaper. Fix that problem first, then start yelling about regulation.

You don't think there's a possibility the unjustifiable cost might come from the regulation more than the lack of value in displacing almost the entire electricity market?
That is good to hear. Currently fully remote, but workspace will definitely be a criteria if I move on to a place with an office.
Hmm, yes, mainly remote (Red Hat notwithstanding), but no, not a business, so I am not sure it's quite clear-cut enough to use as proof...
Thank you very much for taking the time to read those posts and write this thoughtful response! I really appreciate it.

> What the heck did that guy post?

You should be able to see everything by turning 'showdead' on in your profile.

(Standard disclaimer: if you do that, please realize that you're signing up to see the worst that the internet brings to HN; and don't forget that you did it! We regularly get emails from users complaining about awful comments on HN, and then it turns out those accounts were banned a long time ago and the user just forgot that they had 'showdead' on.)
The 60,000+ of us in the Bluesky beta would disagree but sure, be flippant.

It's a work-in-progress. As I'm sure you know, you can't build and launch everything at once, so the rather small dev team has a roadmap, and is building and testing features in sequence.

When they get close to launching a new major feature, like federation they make announcements and posts about it, to encourage discussion and debate about it, and look for early adopters who are willing to test it out.
Microsoft is hiring. In the past, Microsoft had gone as far as emulating undocumented/undefined API behavior for misbehaving/buggy applications, to keep them working under new OS releases.

Nobody in GNU/Linux tests old binaries; only whatever they recompiled for their current distro, and screw the rest.

The kernel is pretty good about maintaining syscall compatibility.
2-3% is not nearly enough. They need to reduce fatal/serious accidents by like 99.9% from where they are.
Some real Plato Guardians vibe from all this. Maybe AI will someday in fact be the objective guardians we need (say, if all parties verify the code is objective ex ante). I think men are too prone to corruption and bias for truly bias-free human regulators to exist.
There are more compelling reasons to not have cities in the desert.

If water sources dry up it won't be necessary to raze the city. People will leave anyway.
Hard mode would be anywhere that has snow.
The source (no comment on quality) is cited in a secondary Guardian article:

> But who are the childless and how many of them wanted children? The closest we can come is a 2010 meta-analysis by the Dutch academic Prof Renske Keiser[2], which suggested that only 10% of childless women actively chose not to become mothers. That leaves 90% of women like Day. Only 9% of that 90% are childless for known medical reasons [1].

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/oct/02/the-des...

[2] https://www.nwo.nl/actueel/nieuws/2010/Kinderloosheid+is+zel...

NOTE!! [2] is the actual link given in the 2017 Guardian article and that link to a Dutch popsci site no longer works - link rot strikes again.

For myself I'm rarely swayed by third hand references to meta surveys that "suggest" a result.
My understanding is that the existing rules require a lot more pre-human testing than is necessary if your only goal is a good estimate of the danger level.

Trying to get closer to that amount, and risking more people, might be a bad idea but I would not call it evil.
Whether or not a priest is gay has no bearing on their ability to be a responsible shepherd for their community. It's the 21st century, leave that shit in the past.
You are comparing with the least efficient form of transit, and looking at cities that are not really designed for transit anyway. So yes, bad transit in cities not designed for it isn't that efficient. Note, on top of this, that you are purely looking at energy efficiency, when the key problem of individual robotaxis is space efficiency.

Realistically, what breaks efficiencies in the US is city design: Places of work mostly detached from activities and housing, pretty much guaranteeing inefficiency. The robotaxis don't make a difference here: The max number of people looking to travel at once doesn't change, and neither does their destination. This makes the number of vehicles actually on the road not change very much at all: The best you can do is hope for people being comfortable (and not inconvenienced) by carpooling with strangers, not unlike what lyft and uber offer already. In the middle of the day, there's no new demand for robotaxis: They'd be parked somewhere, and every mile they move is a car/mile of congestion they create. So you either park the cars where the jobs are, getting, in practice, the same results as private vehicles, or you park them somewhere else, increasing total congestion. It's not just robotaxis that would park: See what happens in all the train commuter lines in American cities, where most trains just get parked in a yard.

The miracle of cities with top transit (See, for instance, Madrid), is that a relatively high percentage of the network is about equally busy in both directions. Trains might stop in rush hour, but route 6 will be useful in either direction most of the time, with little waste compared to US cities. This is the real weakness of the argument of just adding more transit: What we need to make it work is basically urban rebuilds. IMO still a good idea, bit it's a far slower, and more expensive problem than it might appear.
> If Norman Borlaug or Frederick Banting never had children but they otherwise did the work that they did, would you consider them selfish?

Probably not (it's a bit judgemental), but if their parents decided to never have children and chilax on the beach instead, they would not have existed at all, and neither would any of their achievements.
Schemaless markup has lead us down a path where something is broken nearly all the time.

I’d really rather see strongly typed markup that can easily be checked for correctness and who’s behavior is well defined. Something Modular too with profiles and designed for extensibility.
"built with barf"
I don't hold a firm stance on whether choosing not to have children is selfish, though I tend to believe it isn't.

Nonetheless, the most compelling arguments suggesting that it could be selfish include:

- ending the family lineage, despite your ancestors' efforts to preserve it;

- relying on society for support in old age;

- failing to contribute to the growth of a culture, society, nation, advancement or humanity;

- depriving yourself or your partner of the potential fulfilment found in raising children;

- and disobeying a religious divine command to procreate, possibly resulting in negative consequences for humanity prescribed by religious beliefs.

Since these arguments are circumstantial, hinging on factors like religion, culture, technology, and taxation, their strength varies among individuals. For instance, in cultures valuing social cohesion and unity through religion (e.g., Polish culture), these arguments may carry more weight than in cultures prioritizing free choice and individualism (e.g., Western culture and values).

In the West, some might argue that pressuring others to have children is selfish, as:

- there may be personal gain involved, such as parents wanting their children to have kids for their own enjoyment or to pass on their values;

- it disrespects personal autonomy and choice of would-be parents;

- it exacerbates future environmental and population issues for short-term personal happiness or fulfilment;

- it ignores a child's right to a good quality of life in cases where parents might struggle to provide it;

- it diverts resources from other families in need.

However, the strength of these arguments also varies among individuals. For example, someone who firmly believes that God prescribed procreation to humanity and that it will ultimately benefit everyone might not find the arguments against pressuring others to have children convincing.

There is also often a significant amount of hand-waving on both sides of these arguments. For instance, some individuals defend their stance by suggesting that society should adapt to accommodate their position (e.g., addressing societal and ecological issues related to procreation through means other than discouraging procreation).

Numerous related arguments inevitably also get invoked in these discussions, like whether and in what circumstances we should advise others on having children. For example, some argue that if prospective parents have a high likelihood of passing on a hereditary disease, they should refrain from procreating. This concept, known as eugenics, is controversial. Critics argue that it restricts bodily freedom and carries negative historical connotations, while proponents claim that it benefits society by easing resource scarcity and reducing the ecological strain on the planet.

There are so many different aspects and strong opinions involved in the question of whether it's selfish not to have kids that it's really difficult to come up with a definitive answer. I am not convinced that the position that not having children is selfish is indefensible or stupid, even if I personally do not agree with it.
Kubernetes with Graphana is free. The combo provides logging, performance stats and graphs and lets you auto-scale based on usage.

Unfortunately, avoiding insanely costly SaaS solutions requires engineers to plan ahead and design the entire stack on top of certain open source solutions. I suspect that many engineers today receive kickbacks from SaaS providers to lock-in their employers. Employers are none the wiser and rarely push back when an engineer suggests a big-name SaaS solution with insane lock-in factor. Nobody seems to care about lock-in these days, it's only when your costs reach almost 100 million and interest rates are going up that you start thinking "Damn, I could have had all that for free if I had planned ahead and resisted all these platform lock-ins and unnecessary proprietary tools..."
Gold is valuable when mined at 0 grams/second. Is Bitcoin valuable at 0 transactions/second? If not, how much slower than 7 transactions/second is acceptable? Why?
You mean the Dude?
Personally I think the newest Wolfenstein games reflect the original game much better than the new Dooms reflect the original Doom, though I’m confident no remakes will ever come close to the masterpieces that are the originals.

I still remember startle jumping every time at the sound of the doors closing behind me the first times playing Wolfenstein as a young kid, Doom 2 is still my all time favorite PC game.
This seems to explain the process: https://medium.com/towards-data-science/how-to-accelerate-an...
The beauty of this being decentralized and open source is that, in theory, there would be a large number of possible algorithms (including "no algorithm") for users to choose from.

There's an earlier blog post that talks about the "algorithm marketplace" that is worth looking up.

I don't think this team "sees" any use cases for sorting feeds right now. In the current beta there are two feeds, your followers which is chronological (and the default) and "What's Hot" which is a haphazard very much placeholder timeline of the "most interacted with" posts, and I think that just means "13 likes or more, then chronological" at the moment.

It's super basic and not at all the priority for them. From all I've seen in my time in the beta, the most important use case they are working towards is "let everyone pick their own way of sorting/filtering/moderating their timeline".
That's where I think you were putting words in his mouth. I don't think they are saying that they would want to do anything unethical or especially dangerous. That's connotation that you are inserting
> I also believe that the entire crypto ecosystem is a wasteful solution in search of a problem.

It’s just embarrassing to write this when there are so many real world examples of solutions being solved right now by crypto, as well as many active users of crypto who couldn’t care less whether it solves a problem you, personally, have.

The fact that you see Celsius, FTX and binance as a paragon of crypto and decentralised finance shows just how little you’ve been paying attention. They are centralised, crypto-adjacent companies. Please look at Yearn, Aave, Curve, Uniswap, GMX, Gearbox, NFTfi, Illuvium, countless NFT gated communities, and news reports of people in the third world using blockchains to make emergency, life saving transactions. And then afterwards maybe your beliefs about crypto might be worth posting in public forums.
I was a little bit disappointed when I discovered which type of hamburger menu they were talking about, I initially thought this article was going to address issues with the common types of sandwiches provided by fast food restaurants. But otherwise, I agree with the points stated in this article.

Although I would put my links in a <nav> section at the bottom of the page above the footer instead of inside the footer itself. Putting links in the header or the footer always seems to cause accessibility issues.

Or better yet, I would put links to the two or three most prevalent pages of the site as well as a link to a separate sitemap page in a navigation section under the header, so it would be something like:

"Home - About - Projects - Sitemap".
i would rather say it's from the 'never let a competitor's dishonesty go unnoticed'

that you call it a 'mistake' speaks very poorly of you
Can't comment on the bluesky aspect, but you've touched on my frustration with ActivityPub. When people were migrating to Mastodon, I took a look at making a single-user instance that would suit my personal needs and gracefully interact with the wider ecosystem and found that in my case the capabilities of ActivityPub are irrelevant, you are tied to the Mastodon teams choices.

Felt very much like in practice it just gives you tools to make mostly-insular federated apps, rather than letting different apps interact.
That Princess Bride reference evolved well. Top form!
What size model are you quantizing and comparing? The interesting thing about quantization, is how the larger the number of parameters, the less of a difference it makes to quantize the weights, even to an extreme degree when working with the largest parameter models. For small models is can be a disaster though.
What stops someone reporting innocent addresses?
I'm not a developer of either of these, but here are two examples:

- https://htmx.org/essays/a-real-world-react-to-htmx-port/ by https://github.com/David-Guillot - a SaaS product migrated to htmx from React.

- https://zorro.management/ by https://twitter.com/Telroshan - a kanban project management tool. This one is particularly interesting IMO, it implements quite advanced UI with htmx and some custom JS.
So an employee is frustrated that the company isn’t paying him/her the deserved compensation, but instead of asking the employer to pay that, you turn to ask the customers who already pay an overpriced items?! What kind of logic is this? Or maybe just mimicking the mockery that happens in restaurant business.
The author challenges you to demonstrate this.
1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3924058/

2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826257/

3. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/japplphysio...

The last one was cool, and new to me.
A Paper That Says Science Should Be Impartial Was Rejected by Major Journals
See my other comment, may scratch your itch.
This is absolute nonsense. Just because some people choose not to understand the concept of work/life balance doesn't mean that the institution of the church is magically beyond reproach. Employers shouldn't get to spy on their employees, full stop. Please stop making excuses for corporate overreach.