skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Free for 60 days?

I don’t pretend to have all the answers, but a more direct relationship I would hope would establish a better pattern for everyone.
> If the old server is offline or unwilling, you cannot move - Your old toots and interactions will still be tied to the old address, so you leave those behind.

This is just like any other system that combine content delivery and identity on the same channel (e.g. web sites). Even if those 2 were separate, if your centralized identity provider is down, there is no way to update clients that depend on it, or to safely attest a new identity.

Allowing unverified servers to claim an identity or kick off a migration is a recipe for widespread hacking.
Any chance I could ask for books you found especially useful in Ruby buy-in?
My point being is that from a computational complexity standpoint, your computer is not a Turing machine, just a very very very large FSM. So it's still very useful to think of it as a Turing machine.
Yep, three in the back and one up front, driver seat empty. (The door won't open for you anyway)
Google officially reveals its first foldable phone: The Pixel Fold
For the love of God, use verifiable package namespaces already.

With package namespaces, you can call your package anything you like that sounds like you're the real thing - lodash-2, lodash-the-one-and-only, lodash-mccloud-of-the-clan-mccloud, go nuts.

But for as long as you don't control lodash.com, then you can't publish your package under the com.lodash namespace, so it's obvious you're not the actual Lodash team.

Baffles me no end. I have no idea why PyPi and Cargo and probably so many others don't do this either, it removes an entire class of supply chain risk, and also prevents people creating dumb packages just to squat on the "good" package names.
Ask HN: Can You Spot AI-Generated Content?
Like many others, I've been experimenting with ChatGPT content and APIs. I tasked it with creating articles for a fictitious website related to idlis and idli cookers (Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idli). I was impressed with the content it generated, so I decided to create a website called https://www.IdliCooker.com using the content and DALL-E generated images.

Below are a few of the relevant prompts I used, along with the content I accepted and rejected:

1. Prompt: Generate a list of articles for idli cookers. Include how they are useful, the best brands, and where to buy them.

ChatGPT generated a list of articles, product recommendations, and benefits. Although it couldn't generate accurate Amazon product links, it recommended suitable products and provided explanations. After some due diligence, I curated the links for the recommended products.

2. Prompt: Create a website with all the above content.

ChatGPT generated an outline of the website homepage, including the logo, website name, navigation menu, featured articles, images, and footer. Note: I used DALL-E to create images based on descriptions. Three out of the eight images are DALL-E-generated, while the remaining are stock images.

3. Prompt: Can you create the homepage in HTML, which includes a list of articles based on the website structure?

ChatGPT began generating a basic HTML outline for the website. While this was amazing, I abandoned the code because it lacked styling. I already had an HTML/CSS template that I could use to plug in the content and deploy the website.

4. Prompt: Create a monetization plan for IdliCooker.com.

ChatGPT generated a list of strategies - E-commerce Store, Display Advertising, Sponsored Content, Affiliate Marketing. I updated the products with Amazon affiliate links. (Note the affiliate links are real, so I may get paid a commission if someone actually buys it). Is it this easy to monetize?

Question: To me, the content is authentic and useful. As a human, can you spot the AI-generated content or do you need to be a SME? Does it matter is it is AI or not if the content is useful and relevant?
Sounds like a way to spend a lot of your time doing “cross functional work.”
For your first point where you are attempting to impose agreement, I believe the other commentator is saying that tradeoffs are non-negligible between the two.

Sounds like the difference between edge and centralized ML scoring.
> on arithmetic expression and type promotion/conversion rules

I agree, those are complicated (not sure about the needlessly). However, one can avoid the bulk of the issue but not doing unsigned arithmetic.

> C++ static polymorphism

I am not clear on what's the connection between static polymorphism and ABI compatibility. In general, C++ always view ABI compatibility as a property of the platform/tools and not of the languages. We do have a pretty standard ABI (Itanium 64) where everbody seems to have converge.
I am not super familiar with rust trait implementation, but it doesn't looks like the language force any particular implementation details. the current compatibility seems more a consequence of having just one rust compiler/tool chain as opposed to a conscious design decision.
Where I live there are several large billboards advertising incredible offers. The fine print is so small I'm not sure it's even possible to read.
Is RedGIFs not Imgur for porn?
Of the goal is to use it to access a large knowledge base (like Google, but with better semantic searching), then it doesn't matter as much. There are some cases where it still matter due to not making some connections (for example, you may want an answer to something and not realize it due to your ignorance - a smaller model will get that a few percentage less times).

But ultimately small models are very good for most things, and much more preferable (to run at the home to organize your digital life, with a small SBC or old computer)
The four-dimensional thing is better than any explanation I can offer... as a skater, with skating things at least.

It doesn't translate to other things at all for me, but this was the most active thing I ever did...

I can watch Rodney Mullen do things I could never physically do, but 'feel' things you wouldn't expect. Examples would be where I'd put my weight, where the board would be pushing back, and how much I should lean forward/back to not slip

It's kind of like when zoning out while driving, in some ways. You go through the motions because you've done all the various pieces before. A kickflip is an ollie with a slide to the side, for example

But, because this process is new, it does take a lot of trial/focus. You get a good idea, but... theory/practice
I was kind of convinced by the article's short-lived argument. I think it would really depend on whether the noun that the "short-lived" is modifying is a subject or object. A human would be long I, while a particle would be short I. But then I have a lot of pronunciation quirks.

Edit to add: The verb forms of "knife" and "wife" both use the same I pronunciation (compared to live and life), so I don't think the comparisons are that convincing after all.
Azure OpenAI Services won't mind this decision since that is their bread-and-butter on this topic.
People with disabilities (mostly vision impaired) browse the internet with "just a keyboard" or a screen reader. It's quite cumbersome, but for some people, that's the best they can do.

At a previous job, we had to follow their extensive rules for making everything accessible. A few things that I can remember:

* minimum contrast ratio

* support for the high-contrast mode that some browsers have

* screen reader support for every UI element - this requires a ton of different things

* everything must be usable without a mouse

There were tools to check for a lot of this. There was a separate team of accessibility people who would check the result and create tickets for things that were not good enough.

It was annoying when the designers specified low-contrast colors, then we'd build it with the colors specified by the designers, and then the tool tells us the colors are unacceptable. Why can't the designers check the contrast ratio of their colors?

Testing with a screen reader was extremely annoying (because it reads a description of the currently focused item), but it gave me a lot of empathy for the poor people for whom this is the only way to use a web UI.
Does anyone have experience using these open source models in production?
Validation logic is surprisingly simple but almost always lives in different domains. Unique columns are a great example, the validation has to happen at the database layer itself and whatever language is used to call it will just be surfacing the error.

Language and runtime decisions really need more context to be useful. JS everywhere can work well early on when making a small number of devs as productive as possible is a goal. When a project scales parts of the stack usually have different priorities take over that make JS a worse fit.
Could it be configured so if I go to, for example, https://i.haasie.com/something.png and you haven't already backed up from imgur, you back it up when that URL is hit?
Totally random, but I once had a guy try to take my grocery cart... and it was filled with groceries already. Like dude, what?

So now that I know I can be cart jacked!, nah, I'm good.
Models replicating LLaMA are cool, but they are all missing proper multilingual support, which GPT-3.5 is quite good at.
> no way sustainable

> If you can’t explain how a business profit

They profit off the other tiers. This isn't a free product, it's a free tier.

Whether that's sustainable depends on how much it costs to run. But it can definitely be a sustainable marketing expense.
Part of this announcement is the completion of retiring our Pacifica fleet. So while we used to have the vans on the road in Chandler, you'll now see the same vehicles that were in Downtown Phoenix and San Francisco.
Yeah, I have read about the things they want to do which are mostly cryptography related and which have absolutely zero reasoning as to _why_ they can't be done with ActivityPub. Signing all your messages? Yeah, you can append Ed25519 signature chains to any ActivityPub message. You could publish your base public key when creating an account. You could make software that hides all this beneath an abstraction layer so the end-user never has to deal with it. Exporting all your data and uploading it to another server is something you can already do with Mastodon. E2EE message? Coming soon to Mastodon. It's all things you can do _very easily_ on top of a fault tolerant federated public messaging system.

ActivityPub of course uses the same cryptographic certification virtually all the web does, just TLS/HTTPS and relies on the host cert to be valid. But if you wanted to add further levels of verification like pubkeys and sigs, there's absolutely nothing stopping you.
As far as I know, in the case of stack overflow, the code that aborts the process should literally just be a single line of assembly that contains an invalid opcode, resulting in a (safe) segfault. What has given you the impression that there is potential for UB in these code paths?

EDIT: ah, I see your other comment.
I say we need basic universal internet infrastructure in the same way we have roads, libraries, hospitals, mail service, etc. Fundamental services like email, image and video hosting, backup storage, small cloud nodes, and so on. All partially or fully publicly funded, with no bloat or wasted overhead trying to commercialize it into an advertising platform filled with spyware and dark patterns.
Seems like a reasonable list. I'm sure everyone will hate it.
While it's often said that 'a person who represents themselves has a fool for a lawyer', one certainly shouldn't be penalized for trying to care of one's own paperwork. Is there a rational reason not to have basic things like a photocopier and mail franking machine available for people using a prison law library? I don't see one.
Again, if your computer is not a Turing Machine, then it must be able to run programs that the Turing Machine class is not able.
Can't court documents be sealed? And public documents use an alias?
I don't mind the article as I take the points as the location of work should match the stages and culture of the team/business. In a weird parallel to "the difference between a house and a home".

If I was being general I'd say that leaders need to focus on creating an environment where people feel secure, engaged and connected to each other. And people are empowered to create this environment for others.

What location this is done in shouldn't be the focus.

Offices, factories, beaches, houses don't have the above because buildings don't create it, people do.
Most medicine is toxic to some degree. It's all about the cost vs the reward.

I like sugar, salt and caffeine. I consume them to a degree that causes me low lever physical harm. I enjoy them and am happy with the cost. Many cannabis users do the same with cannabis but some seems to think it's a magic cure all. I'm strongly sceptical of such claims.
Leave your cart by the end caps if the isle is full.
This is a case in which the plaintiff claimed that the other party in a very large housing development contract went back on the implied promise of seeking planning permission, and it was ruled in the plaintiff's favour due to this:

> Thus, it seems to me that the content of the obligation of utmost good faith in the SPA was to adhere to the spirit of the contract, which was to seek to obtain planning consent for the maximum Developable Area in the shortest possible time, and to observe reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing, and to be faithful to the agreed common purpose, and to act consistently with the justified expectations of the parties. I do not need, it seems to me, to decide whether this obligation could only be broken if QD or CPC acted in bad faith, but it might be hard to understand, as Lord Scott said in Manifest Shipping how, without bad faith, there can be a breach of a "duty of good faith, utmost or otherwise".

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff77660d03e7f57eac9...
FastMail is life <3 simple, consistent, affordable. Will pay them till death.
Same style not an identical one, where your contents are in the platform itself, not just a link, similar to old forums style where you write whatever you want and people discuss it back.
Mistreating animals is a multi-million dollar industry. People in power have been known to cater to those who can spend the most on lobbying efforts. Even if your representative doesn’t get influenced by lobby groups, there is a whole ideology disproportionately popular among the ruling class around lax government involvement. Representation in congress sits at one representative per 4-5 hundred thousand constituents, one of the lowest representation in the world. If your representative is holds opposite ideology from yours or if the majority in congress has the opposite ideology from you and your representative, you have little chance of changing an institution which is independent from congress. If you and your representative and majority of congress hold the same ideology, but the majority of senate or the president don’t, you have little chance of being heard.

No. It is childishly optimistic to thing we the people can change anything about this. Our best shot is complaining on social media and write articles in news magazines, but even that has limited results.
This was my experience as well. Angular became really popular in enterprise teams that were already full of devs with a lot of C# and MVC or MVC experience.
Huh, sounds like people are yanking your chain? I have literally never heard of left and right socks and kettles - both electric and flat bottomed urns of metal - are commonplace.

Might be one of those regional thing.
I'm gonna guess you've never been in legal jeopardy, or flat broke, as many criminal defendants are.
Call by name call by reference call by value.

It's name is pixel

It's reference is phone

It's value is tablet.
you got me so excited!... till I could find no mention of pork and porcfest in the same sentence

tl;dr Porc refers to porcupines, which is their mascot for libertarians
Full disclosure, I'm antispeciesist and an animal rights activist. - also, love your comment and spelling out both types.of inspections.

To me, industries that are responsible for the well being of animals are more similar to old persons homes, hospitals and kindergardens - they are responsible for the well being of individuals that can't care for themselves. Being at the mercy of the workers, the individuals need better protection than is afforded by spot inspections.

Another thing that should raise scrutiny in these context is that animal welfare costs money, and companies are there to maximise profits - which creates a perpetual tension between respecting animals rights and better/faster results/profits.

And a quote : Freedom is the right of all sentient beings - Optimus Prime
And yet... https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/caught-on-camera-teen-jump...
Thanks for the report! We can continue there. :)
> Tbh, you shouldn't compare Tesla "AutoPilot" with these full self driving options.

Right. Because Tesla FSD “beta” is not guaranteed, even if you pay for the monthly subscription.

And even if you did have Tesla FSD beta, it’s a pile of shit. It’s gets worse every quarter as they continue to remove safety sensors from vehicles due to supply chain issues.
> and you just take it without paying, you are the one cheating.

I think you glossed over the part where I pay for everything I pirate.
Sandi Metz and Avdi Grimm are the people I mostly read.

Practical Object Oriented Design in Ruby by Sandi. She has a lot of great talks on YouTube as well.
Maybe they're still sore from the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook%E2%80%93Cambridge_Ana...
But is your loss from adopting those teach standards, or from being un-embeded in the business team?

Tech orgs and those standards exist because:

- tech generally doesn't understand business
- the business struggles to express it's needs to tech

Embedding worked for you, but how big was your team? Could that scale?

I'm not questioning your success or your frustrations, but how unique was the situation for your success?
David Carr (RIP, NYT) vs Some guys from Vice: https://youtu.be/iLmkec_4Rfo
And I wonder if this 1975 story inspired A Zed and Two Noughts (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Zed_&_Two_Noughts)
obviously I'm not GP because, what is wrong with capitalizing on a competitor's mistake? Isn't that the point of competition?
“We fully expect to continue offering the Zulip Cloud Free plan indefinitely” doesn’t exactly garner confidence from an article written by a competitor. SMH.
They really did make that bridge as ugly as possible.
Ooh sun tea is so good - it doesnt just resemble it, it can make for a tasty drink. Extraction is a function of temperature and time after all, and lower temperature extractions dissolve less of the more bitter chemicals in plants.
Yes, perhaps "indirect call" would better capture my thinking here rather than "dynamically dispatched". :)

> With Rust, I think methods on trait objects should be enough dynamic dispatch to make it impossible to prove the absence of stack overflows.

Well, trait objects are absolutely dynamically-sized types, but in order to store them on the stack you'd need to stuff them behind a Sized pointer type. But there might be other strange edge cases that prevent the ability to guarantee the absence of stack overflows (to say nothing of the fact that stack size differs between platforms).
> SUVs that conveniently skirted emissions regulations which smaller cars were required to fulfill.

How would you expect a larger car to adhere to the same emissions regulation as a smaller car?

>Interesting how your definition of dystopian is exactly what marketing/PR has been invented to do, to change the minds of people about what are their "needs".

When the government does it, it's definitely a problem because there is not much mechanism to check this power.

When it's a company doing it to sell a product, it's a problem if there are no competitors. That's sort of why we have fairly stringent anti trust regulation.
ads, vc, data harvesting and brokerage, managed services (hosting, infra) on a subscription model offered to orgs?

the ethical model is obviously ActivityPub tho

adding more than snark to my reply: I want to know if the PBLLC intends to submit this protocol to the IETF or W3C. We do the RFC thing for a reason folks.
I suspect everyone acknowledges the existence of life, but only a small subset of people think it's because of any particular god, so I'd argue your claim that the former definitely proves the latter.

Objectively, a virgin birth is implausible, and consider that the first claim of this was made some 70 years after the alleged event, by an unknown author writing about people they had never met, nor so far we can tell, had ever talked to anyone who'd met any of the people involved. Then you have the contention around translations - virgin vs young woman, etc.

So, we've got a distinct lack of evidence for any of that -- in comparison to some increasingly gap-reduced hypotheses around how life started on Earth.

Someone else mentioned Nick Lane, and I'd recommend his work if you're genuinely curious.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/apr/22/the-vital-ques...
Fluoride isn't a metal!
Thanks. I am more surprised it works at all.

So do they use the weights that are say 32 bit floats and just round them to the nearest something putting them in a range 0-255? I guess I can see how it could work if weights are all close to zero, so -1 to 1 is mapped to 0-255.

But I would have though the model relied on the higher accuracy during training. So losing that would screw it up.
> and that he didn't filter what he published

This has been debunked many times over. It's the Guardian journalists, David Leigh and Luke Harding, that published the password to the unredacted archives. Assange, on the other hand, was "meticulous about redacting names in the documents."

https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2020-09-26/guardian-assan...
I'm saying that a silicon computer a lower completely class than a theoretical Turing machine, not higher
Sure, with respect to a fixed problem I agree. With respect to static rendering vs building an application state machine, though, the problem isn’t fixed, and inherently has more complexity
This reminds me of the true crypt project which was suddenly “not safe anymore” (NSA). Now I wonder if that was a simple hint about the pbkdf2 being utterly broken.
Very cool - thx!
I particularly -liked- False Memory, even thought it might not be one of his best if that makes sense. That is to say, it's good but I think it just particularly resonated with me due to the subject matter and some of my innate inclinations.

Beyond that, some that I would recommend include The Bad Place, The House of Thunder, The Door to December, and Intensity.
ublock works on kiwi browser on android for this website.
I’m a lawyer. I think a reasonably competently drafted terms of service could obviate most legal exposure. In the event that a promissory estoppel cause of action was established (like other posters have, I think, correctly noted, but which would also be an expensive affirmative burden to prove in court) then the plaintiff would still have to prove damages. And what is that, $10 per month per user for the affected period? And I don’t think “forever” is an enforceable affected period.

So short answer, probably no practical legal remedy imho.
Vespa.ai is pretty crazy too, a bit unkown we run a huge vespa cluster serving 1k+ queries with <100ms latency ...
Fair point. At utility scale the power requirement is non-trivial. Like anything, there's more than one way to do it, and there's pros and cons to everything. It's up to the owner to decide what they're comfortable with :)