skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Forlinx's FETMX9352-C is a powerful dual ARM Cortex-A55 and one Cortex-M33 real-time core NXP i.MX9352 System on Module(SoM) / Computer on Module with up to 1.7GHz integrated with NPU that accelerates machine learning inference, supported Linux 5.15.52+Qt 6.3.2 system, Learn more about its features and specifications at Forlinx's website.
Thoughts on Appdynamics? aernt they DD's competitor.
Articles obviously add information: is it a specific, known house you are going to (I'm going to the house) or a non-specific/not previously referred to (I'm going to a house)?

When it's your own house you're going to, you could argue the definite article wouldn't add anything, and the phrasal verb to go home drops it (ie. I'm going home), though adding an article is possible and changes the meaning (I'm going to the/a home, in the context of a home for the elderly or some such).
The 23% cut the platform takes is killing the value proposition, what am I missing?

We're currently self hosting our bounties (https://mudlet.org/bounty) and that is working out alright.
George Bernard Shaw said “The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.”
I am not sure any more about all the parties involved in the war, but some parts of it indeed seem to align with the Horseshoe theory. But then you have all the rest too, including the conspiracy theorists and whatnot. It is a dangerous game to play in this era of disinformation and propaganda.

As for science, diversity is of course a laudable goal. But it shouldn't come with a subsequent politicization of science.

PS. The actual article that NYT discussed was garbage too.
> No, simply because no company or product is going to be around "forever". It's an impossible promise.

Real world customers are actually smarter and they don't take words literally. They know that contracts don't mean anything once one of the parties is not around.

By the same logic making annual contracts should also be illegal because there is no guarantee that your company or product will be around until next year.
Agreed. I'll put in $1k. How much will you contribute?
The most fun is reading threads about cars or racing, where people say "break" when they mean "brake".

Should we accept "break" to mean deceleration, or as a noun for the equipment to slow down a vehicle, then?
Blues, booze and debauchery: the agonising life and death of Paul Butterfield
l'informatique, as a French person, has always failed to capture my imagination as the same way as Computer Science. I wish Informatics was what the Anglosphere had selected because I think it sounds pretty groovy
> So it's not a valid point.

Economics textbooks are not written by people trying to hype an asset.

> you could say the same thing about people trying to prop up the capitalist system

Sure, and the heavily manipulated housing market, propped up by QE which dramatically inflated asset prices, is a major issue facing several large economies (eg., AU, UK esp.).

However homes, at the end of the day, are homes. If you're conned into overpaying 100,000 on a home whose value will drop 150k at some point because of obvious on-coming market corrections -- well, you still have a home.

Crypto's market correction is "to about zero". And there's no home left.

Crypto is a scam. These ideas are part of the scam. These whatabouts and fasle equivocations.

It's as much a homeopath saying, "what about big pharma?"
I do cycling trips with my 10 year old son, we need a simple and cheap solution to spend a night in a different place every day. The requirements are: two beds or big double bed, cheap and breakfast included if possible.

I never found anything on Airbnb to satisfy my needs, an hotel was always the cheaper and easier option. I'm always checking Airbnb as it has rooms in small towns along our way that would make our trip easier.

The very few places on Airbnb cheaper than the hotel usually required a 10-20km detour.
And I'm not even counting the extra steps needed which make Airbnb a bad choice, like the message to convince your host to accept your booking, the need to communicate with him about your arrival time, analysing the photos to figure out if you have one or two beds, the house rules about cleaning etc..
is redmond-chan even a real person ?
Likely logging something for every order placed/removed/modified on every order book, which can be thousands per second per order book.
Back in the days, when JSON became popular as response type for rendering in the client, I saw arguments such as "the JSON payload is smaller than sending full HTML, so you pay the download only once instead of N times".
Only once, because what has to be done with the JSON has been downloaded in the JS bundle. With full HTML, full HTML comes back in every response.

However, I'm not sure if this is actually a problem or rather depends on how much interaction the user does (so where is the "turning point" of the overhead of having all in the bundle vs full HTML responses). What does everyone think?
Intend all the hate you want, they don't care, they will mandate their world even when it's wrong to do so.

If hate is what would get them to stop, they'd have quit before they began.
Depends a lot what sort of scale you are on too. Grafana Cloud will be cheaper than DD but is not quite as end-user friendly.

Running it yourself is not too hard up if you are not having to do clustering ( say 1m metric series, 100GB/day logs). But different people have different comfort levels for that.

With any monitoring system most of the work is actually making use of the data. Tagging, Alerts, Dashboards and especially onboarding all the teams. You can spend a lot of time and money rolling something out and then barely anybody uses it.
Yeah, well the FDA does not think so and they have a pretty good track record on both safety and expedience when it matters as seen with the expedited COVID vaccine testing.

Also, it is not like this is even new technology that requires bespoke safety analysis. There are tons of companies making intracranial implants to support brain computer interaction in human clinical testing and in deployment generally. Here [1] is one in 2016 of a man controlling a robotic arm to shake Obama’s hand with sensory feedback.

In contrast, from what I have read Neuralink has used and killed over 10x the average number of animal test subjects and still failed to adequately characterize and reduce the risks to the standard level that literally dozens or hundreds of other researchers achieve routinely. They should ostensibly have 10x the data and experience yet they have failed to achieve even the minimal standard for the easiest step.

So forgive me if I trust the FDA and their rules written in blood over the student who wants the test to be easier.

[1] https://youtu.be/rqD-I1ehf5E
No thanks, I'm fine not letting people reach into my inbox to delete things.
I have no information to back up this claim but my guess is that nearly all of the users of Mozilla's non-Firefox products also use Firefox (e.g. all Relay users are Firefox users). If this is true, they still need a best-in-class browser to attract users to their paid services.

Moreover, if a majority of their income is from Google from being their default search engine, then it behooves Mozilla to increase their browser's market share.
> trying to persuade reluctant persons that they should have children seems like a really bad idea

Indeed, persuading hesitant individuals to have children could be detrimental, as it might interfere with their varied values and beliefs.

For example, convincing a financially insecure (and aware of it) person to have children would make them act against their principles. This situation may result in considerable practical difficulties, of course, but also significant moral suffering.

With that said, some cultures do not care about the beliefs and values of individuals as much as the collective. Religions have an element of this, too. In that case, is it right to persuade someone reluctant to have children? I am way out of my depth to even try and answer that.
Fun part is there is no “better” in generic terms.

Another fun part is that people on the internet complain but without merit. I cannot judge some project because I usually don’t know the project. So might as well be that monolith or not team was having high attrition or there might be many other things that would affect project.
Real URL: http://catb.org/~esr/writings/unix-koans/
So if most readers are not really confused by the incorrect usage ("comprised of") and they understand roughly what is being said through context, and no readers learn the correct usage of "comprised" because this editor is simply erasing it.. then what is actually being achieved here? If the editor were correcting the bad usages then I would likely consider this a service to the public but as it stands they're just perpetuating ignorance. In any case though, I think I agree with those calling this a waste of time, time that I think would be far better spent reworking articles for https://simple.wikipedia.org/.
Travel Agents tend to be free (for the traveler), what are you talking about?
It’s not really the same though. Solitary confinement in a prison is lack of any type of stimulation. You are on your own in a small empty room with nothing to do.

Hardly the same as being free to do whatever you want in your own home surrounded by entertainment and stimulation and knowing you have the ability to communicate with others if you want.
Wow! I sincerely wonder how all those folks manage to do business in the tech industry without ever touching Linux, Git, Bash, GCC, glibc, WordPress, Ansible, Grafana, MongoDB, 7-Zip, Vim, Emacs, Firefox, Thunderbird, StackOverflow, Wikipedia, most web fonts, most ad blockers, and all the rest!
I'm pretty sure this API doesn't run synchronously. You're not going to sit with a request open for hours (days?) waiting for the server to return data to you.

Email is maybe not ideal, but a lot of the other ways of returning results from an API asynchronously require clients to set up their own infrastructure (or pay to use someone else's), which might not be desirable for this particular API's users.
Lol, nobody asked for his expert opinion on something which has been happening ever since the internet whether it is outsourcing, freelancing or entrepreneurship which by itself begins without renting/buying an office until you need it absolutely. Let people/companies decide what works for them
Quite a lot of detailed design work has already been done on this for RISC-V. It is currently expected to be ratified in Q3 this year.

https://github.com/riscv/riscv-cfi/raw/main/riscv-cfi.pdf
Reality is geographically, poor global south likely to bear higher brunt of climate change, while many in northern regions will be net benefitiaries. But poverty immediately sucks more than climate change, hope is that development via whatever means will uplift more than a few degrees dooms. How many people in developed north would trade their inhospitable winters in heated homes for being impoverished in more fair weathered country. None, because they learned to live with the cold.
Replacable but with full-frame.
There is probably a demographic that would get excited by the esthetics of this and can easily splurge and has a third or fourth vacation home in a dark sky location.

(Remember, the most valuable European company peddles luxury products)

The fun question is what fraction of that demographic is on HN.
L'academie get to wear cool robes, pretend togas. Did the French just invent "Les Coupeurs de la Pierre"? Did they kill la Voiture électrique?
I wonder how many people on HN have even heard of Paul Butterfield? Maybe they watched the Woodstock movie and that might be their entire reference. As a life long blues fan he was a favorite.

But as this story illustrates his career was a huge arc of immense fame and then a decline into obscurity after he turned thirty. He turned a lot of boomers onto the blues. He was also responsible for convincing Bob Dylan to adopt electric guitar. I predict some future generation will rediscover him - he was simply too great to be ignored forever.
I think a more apt comparison would be the buzz around Siri when it first appeared on the iPhone and people started having conversations with it. There was much interest in this assistant and since then normal consumers have found value in a range of audio assistants from Apple, Google and Amazon- but they have simply been too limited . In a way the public have been conditioned and sold their personal “Watson” for the past 10 years but they really have not done that much. Now we are seeing that same public finding a much higher level of value in the new tools. Tools that appear to be delivering more of what has been promised to consumers for a decade.
I'm curios how much more difficult is generative 3D?

We are barely able to generate 2D 1080p images, without artefacts using diffusion methods. How much more complex is the jump to production grade 3D?

As someone creating re-usable 3D product models on Polymock @ https://polymock.com the bigest issue for me, is that you want your models to be editable. 3D modellers want to post-process and add tweaks to existing 3D models. Current AI generators lack this layering structures.

What I actually want, is a 3D generator for textures / materials. It should be a much simpler task for current AI.

At the moment, the state of 3D generators is slowly ripening for indie game developers. I'm sure that in the near future, the models will be high-enough quality to generate a basic character set.

Others have mentioned it, but I think NVIDIA has an edge in 3D synthesis
& rendering. OpenAI is arguable the leader in consumer text-transformers - I wonder the goal for releasing this POC (I don't think they will allocate any serious resource here)
25 billion per year ought to be enough for anybody- that's 1/3 of total us ukraine aid! every year! for goofy space stuff!
I feel like lock-in is an understatement. If Relay shuts down or you opt to stop paying, your online presence is basically halted without a LOT of work to change your email everywhere.
Are you at all familiar with 'the email protocol'? I've read enough to implement a client and relay, and I can't imagine what that would look like. Email certainly continues to develop (e.g. BIMI) but that doesn't mean you can bolt on anything; deletion seems fundamentally not possible without an overhaul such that it would be an unrecognisable system. Standardising 'deletion requests' (such as Outlook has a proprietary version of I think?), but is there any point? Is it worth the confusion from users who would reasonably expect that deletion means deletion, not ~hide, and even that only if the receiving client is up to date with latest spec and does implement it?
Is the abomination that is “I’ll revert on that” a wart?
It's hard to see how this protocol would resist centralization, similar to Mastodon.
Not all heroes wear capes.

"draws" instead of "drawers", "brought" instead of "bought", "aircrafts", "softwares", and "could care less" can also DIAGF.
"I upgraded my breaks and my car slows down a lot better now.".

Spot any mistakes? Do you understand what I mean in context anyway? So is it fine to use "breaks" when I mean "brakes"?
> Well done, you’ve defeated link rot

Until this site succumbs to the challenges of being a free image host?

FWIW ArchiveTeam is grabbing as much as possible so it could eventually show up in the wayback machine. Though what they have now, 47TB, is a drop to the petabytes imgur probably has now. There was an estimated 376 TiB in 2015.

- https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/Imgur

- https://tracker.archiveteam.org/imgur/
From my point of view there's a world of difference between "we fully expect to continue offering free indefinitely" and "free forever". In the first case, they talk about their expectations, while the second case is a promise. Also "indefinitely" means that the end is unknown, not that it's forever.
We haven’t watched the same FSD videos on YouTube lately but ok.
Western Digital Customer Data, Credit Cards Accessed in Hack
This is crypto. Literally, the cartoon world.
We will worry about pronunciation when the ship actual product, ok?
2023 Economist crony-capitalism index
https://archive.ph/JBvxu
The Tesla full self driving private beta is more comparable, but not able to drive by itself for long time.
Except there is no such thing. To quote.

> Wikipedia does not have a policy or guideline on whether "comprised of" is welcome in the encyclopedia.

This is nothing less but one person trying to punch way above their weight in shaping the English language.
Teachers are well paid in Finland and Denmark (for example).
More likely it's a marketing ploy to gather a nerd army to shout at them and attract the less caring audience to their another overpriced product. Does this Hyperia even exist at all? In this market, it's more typical to rebrand an existing proper device than to make something like this. If it really does, it's just a pitch for people with more money than astrophoto knowledge.
Edit: That should have been `[ "${myvar+set}" = "set" ]` for checking that `myvar` is set.
This is a Veblen good. It doesn't have to excel at anything.
Love the look and feel. It's the perfect mix of clean and chaotic.
As someone that works at a link-in-bio company, I find the way you've approached this far more creative.
I wish I got to wear robes
I just hope that they don't wake up one morning and realise they've wasted years of their life on some trivial crusade. Actually, that could apply to a lot of us on HN I guess :)
1) The site has a nice design. Yet, the text in the buttons can be selected, but the hashes in the top lists cannot.

2) I cannot find one of the top hashes when searching for it. Shouldn't there be an entry?

3) Votes can be abused. Have you considered comments to add more depth?

4) What's your contingency plan? Who owns the data? Why should people build or defend their reputation on your platform?

5) The url for a searched hash is not compatible with forms

Overall, it would be nice if there was another trust provider on the internet. Perhaps you can generalize the concept and offer trust for all accounts. E.g. there could be an independent evaluation of Twitter and ActivityPub accounts.
On a vaguely related note but still shows how the World works. Back in 1992, my Eastern European computer science teacher told us a story. He used to work as a programmer, doing "ERP" software for communist companies (state-owned, of course). The software would run on machines featuring Z80 CPU with CP/M operating system. Anyhow after the change of regime they got 386 PCs and rewrote the software to run on them. The performance gain was staggering but ... users (directors of said companies) complained. The software would cost a lot but seemengly would not "work hard" for it. On the old machines it would take a lot of time to process anything, it was obvious the software was "working hard". On the PCs the same operation which would take minutes or hours would complete instantly. Obviously the job was too easy and thus much overpriced.

Faced with this serious problem impacting sales, the programmers thought about it and eventually found a solution. They added... SLEEP instructions. All over the code in key points, sleep(seconds), calibrated so the response time was about the same as on ye olde CP/Me machines.

Customer reaction: completely satisfied.

... I think we can draw some conclusions on the universality of human stupidity and incentives to act that way.
it solves static traffic, which in many cities will solve traffic
How is this even measured? My gut tells me the data are nuanced.
Two reasons: They were only recently implemented in large production models and are not part of ye-standard-ML-coursera.
And I mean, for half the papers claiming that their particular efficiency variant reduces O(n^2) to whatever without performance loss, we found that in practice it ain't quite so shiny.

Anyone who has been for whatever reason reading the papers since 2017 has invariably read dozens of these papers.

Anyone who has heard of GPT-x in 202x and started from there probably didn't.

This will likely change with implementation of memory retrieval, some form of linear attention etc. in many productions models, and the democratization of some decoder models... although I have been thinking this for a while.

Don't get me wrong, you want to hire the people who know these papers, especially if they started after 2017 :-)
> If we can’t say that “comprised of” is objectively wrong, then what _can_ we say about English?

I haven't read John McWhorter's "Words on the Move", but he addresses this question there, and this review has a summary:

https://byfaithweunderstand.com/2017/06/15/review-john-mcwho...

- Isolated cases of 'incorrect' usage can be considered 'incorrect'.

- Widespread usage that's different would be better described as a shift in language.
How is it even possible to cheat on a musical performance practical exam?
Let’s see what the classics say about this. Mr Conway says, that an organization creates a system in its image. Thus, if the system needs to be very distributed, so does the organization. So unless there is a singular monolithic thing built by a focused local team, a singular monolithic team makes no sense. And a team that’s not like that benefits little from their physical location, as a large chunk of their work is non-physical communication anyway. Even when the other team sits in the same building, who’s going to spend 10 minutes going to another floor when they can just message?

Office architecture is seen as ideologically driven. People like open offices so we do those. People like working from home (or office), so we do that. But office structure is as much part of the architecture of your enterprise as is database or microservice structure. It should aid progress toward a particular goal of the organization and not be subject to any hype in any direction.
I miss being young. Ducks will far outnumber, eventually.
Why do you think that? Of course some actors will be larger and more popular than others, but what about the protocol inherently leads to centralization?
The fact you accept this assertion as if it were a fact is exactly why I posted the comment in the first place.
Looks alright, I like the retro 90's 00's look.

The owner is always online.
Yes I understand; no it is obviously not "fine". I'm not sure what your point is, because I'm not saying to leave "breaks" there. My POV is that changing your sentence to

>"I upgraded the bits that slow my car down and my car slows down a lot better now."

does not help anyone learn that brakes is correct and breaks is not.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6604188/
Coincidentally Outer Space Treaty has same signatories as 1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances. Feel free to look up how that last one worked out.
It was all dumb pedantry until the point where the editor talked about removing instances of "comprised of" inside quotes.

Sure, you can add an elipsis if you want trim a quote, but altering words in a quote is equivalent to lying, even if a mild form of lying.
> why should people who can’t use the language properly () be an uncontested force in that evolution?

For the same reason people with different opinions should still be allowed to vote.
Also it's not an uncontested force, you are free to vote for the "correct" use of the language by actively using it yourself in that way and trying to convince others. Just like everyone else.

In 200 years people might learn "should of" in school, just like we today call that one symbol "ampersand". And they will find some new word to complain about, just like probably every generation since at least middle english did because it was all the "correct" version of the language to them.