skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Google and OpenAI are Walmarts besieged by fruit stands
It's Hella expensive so I think they are ok for now

Until they cut down the cost then they should worry yeah
First direct image of a black hole expelling a powerful jet – ESO
> It's illogical for a word to mean two opposite things.

LOL, can't wait for this person to dedicate their life to fixing the Japanese wikipedia.
I think it's even worse, because so many plants were built in the 70s and 80s, and then there is a large gap. So we don't even have the routine and economies of scale associated with an s-curve anymore. And new plants promise better safety and new features, so we would really start all over again on the s-curve.
Abandoning the US, More Scientists Go to China
Kids need a large house? Not places to play outside with their friends? What is a kid going to do in the suburbs that doesn't rely on being ferried around in a car for hours each day?
I don’t see that in this specific case for one thing or how we are closer from before. Code generation and auto correction getting closer is very cool, the singularity needs to be spelled out for me how a tool making a tool will get us there. How does that solve all of the hurdles that go into AGI or the singularity. How does it change a large language model.
That’s happens and the boss also has the power to fix it. It’s part of that whole responsibility thing. If a majority of a bosses employees are defrauding them, then it sounds like they aren’t good at hiring. If it’s a minority then it’s their job to get rid of those people. It’s shocking to see people complain about coworkers literally not logging in for weeks as why remote doesn’t work. That just means your supervisor’s aren’t doing their job either.
Moving to Netherlands?
I've now got access to GPT-4-0314, anybody know the difference between that and the 32k model in this post?
It's a bit of a hypochondriac take IMO. Just wiping the facial interface is enough. Toilet door handles and public transport supports are much worse. And people don't frantically wipe those with "real cleaning fluid". Just don't lick it and you're fine.

But anyway whatever floats your goat :)

Ps do people really do the hand sanitizer thing anymore? In these parts I never see it anywhere anymore (or if there's still a bottle on a reception counter it's all dried up) and the supermarkets don't sell it anymore either.
Make sure you are testing with the tiktokenizer: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35460648
I don’t see any evidence in the proposal that fraud is known to have originated from UK-based SIM farms. Maybe I missed this, but even so I can’t imagine that banning these devices would have any impact on fraud.

It would be just as easy to get SIMs that support roaming and text outside the UK, or better yet just use WiFi texting.
Maybe django is less so a dependency bloat than most other frameworks. Just called out the common consequences of getting more. You get more.

Npm projects are likely the most bloated by far, but also are java based projects, just look at Spring.

Calling out a python framework or some Go lean solution being the exception of the rule is fair enough, my point is developers expect everything and have little to do but rapid painless developement

I would love to hear about those asked to migrate their python 2.7 django ecommerce app to python3 since v2 is totally dead and unmaintained posing serious security risks. But sure if we forgo these things, and don't ever need to touch the code again, some frameworks have no downside. Makes a certain kind of developers finally be right.
You can already do this in theory with tools like AutoGPT and BabyAGI. Why hasn't the singularity happened already?
This is the crux of the issue to me - this use of "comprised of" is a completely logical and consistent usage whether or not some people think it's wrong. Plenty of times correct constructions are considered wrong by lots of people, this is what leads to the phenomenon of "hypercorrections". I won't argue that this is necessarily one since the "corrections" don't strike me as better or worse, but languages are inherently subjective. For this reason I find it distasteful to go around enforcing linguistic policies on others.
Fair point, but then the article is demonstrating that people trained to do specific types of care actually might have better outcomes than generalist education.

This still seems significant to me.

Most of the comments so far seem focused on the fact this was done in a resource-limited setting, and comparing specialists to generalists. I think that's important to keep in mind, and maybe the title was misleading (I didn't post the article).

However, a study like this would be difficult to do in less resource-limited settings due to all sorts of issues, some of which are due to prudence, and some of which probably less so. It's typical of medical research in developed countries to not lower the standard of care, so this sort of study might never get done otherwise.

So, if you take it for what it is, it's suggesting that a type of procedure classically pointed to as a reason for strict medical licensing forms in fact does not necessarily work the way you think in terms of training background and outcomes. It doesn't point to getting rid of licensing, it just suggests that a particular type of educational and training background does not necessarily result in better outcomes.

This type of finding isn't uncommon in different areas of medicine, and the research is often fighting against double standards, in the sense that you're not just comparing training models, you're comparing time with training program experience as well: the alternative training tracks are often newer and involve less opportunities to have worked out problems, improve certain issues etc.

The irony is that this sort of thing is playing out in the US anyway, under the radar. For example, medical schools are often reducing coursework to a 1.5 years or even 1 year, meaning that a PA with an additional 2-3 years of training post degree often has as much experience in the clinic as a new MD. If you took them and gave them 3-4 years of additional training, they'd probably look similar in outcomes to someone coming out of a residency. I might be wrong about that, but healthcare administrators are increasingly voting with their dollars and apparently don't really see a significant difference in outcome.
I was responding to this:

> I find it just wild that people would object to better language.

They're either saying that their own sense of what is more legible is enough to define what is better, or they're buying into the pedantic arguments in TFA.

As to what is easier to read, I think the English Wikipedia should be written to be legible to native English speakers. This is better for everyone: native English speakers can read their Wikipedia, and English learners get exposed to actual English usage rather than a simplified version.

In this case, it's not obvious to me that any substantial portion of the English-speaking population sincerely gets confused by "comprised of". It feels much more like the insistence on not ending sentences in prepositions: a rule for the sake of having a rule.

EDIT: In fact, "comprised of" recently overtook "comprises" in published books:

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=%22comprised+o...
"Comprises" means "consists of". So "comprised of" means "consists of of". It's not just that some people dislike it; it's simply wrong.

Whenever I come across the word "utilize" in WP, I change it to "use" (with the edit comment "Don't utilize utilize"). Nobody's ever reverted me for that.

I think there is a proper use for the verb "utilize": it means "to render useful". But usually, it's just a substitute for "use" that sounds more erudite, or something. I think to utilize something is to take something that is useless, and turn it into something useful. That's not the same as using the thing.
This is a paid LLM playground site with many models including GPT-4 and Claude-v1.
The usage needs to be for high value queries.

Using it on a simple conversation is not its intended purpose, that's like using a supercomputer to play pong.
There's a section about YouTube in this video [1] by Samuri Guitarist called "How Much Money Guitarists Actually Make Might Surprise You". The YouTube money is covered in the "The Content Creator" section.

Overall the video lives up to its title. I was in fact surprised by how much guitarists actually make. The surprise worked both ways--some of the ways guitarists might make money paid much worse than I expected, and some paid much more.

[1] https://youtu.be/Ch7t9KGcOPk
GPT 4 tells me that on a daily basis because of the 2021 data cutoff.
1. I don't always know beforehand if the command I am about to execute is garbage I'd like not to save.

2. I just don't want to be conscious about that every time I write a command. I'd rather edit history after I've finished some work. But that's just too tedious to do manually, I'd like to have some pre-configured heuristics applied automatically, like "never save cd/ls to history", but provide a way to overrule that rule in rare situations.

3. Absolute/partial/symlinked paths - are another separate problem :'(
Just wait: gpt + 3d printing and soon we won’t even need the medical assistants. Drive thru robo-surgery in the comfort of your own motor vehicle.
For reference, a dev making USD 100k/year and working about 240 days a year, 8 hours/day = total of 1920 hours, or about USD 52/hour, USD 416/day

52/1.92 = 27
416/1.92 = 217

So using GPT-4 with 32k tokens, 27 times per hour, or 217 times per day, in terms of cost, is approximately the equivalent of another dev
Oh, we don't actually delete anything - just deduplicate for search.

Sequential context is something we're building very soon. The idea: you search for "cd /project/dir", press TAB and it opens up a new pane in the tui. This will show the command +/- 10 commands. You can then navigate back in time.

This could indeed be useful for managing that one setup command you always have to run in this project dir but never remember the name of
It reminds of me the rhetorical question: if we found intelligent alien life out there in the universe, would we even be able to recognize it as such?

The same question may apply here: if artificial intelligence emerges, would we be able to realize that it is intelligent?
What tools do you use for the collaboration? Immersed?
It’s been available on Azure in preview. Pricing is double the 8K model.
What does a better LLM mean? We again… already have terminal usage in AutoGPT. It describes a little what you are talking about. What measurement do you use to test if a language model 1 is better than 2? Accuracy? Self reliance? Is that what a Transformer should be doing? Sure an LLM can compete with humans on all of those tasks. Fantastic. So are we at the singularity now as it’s defined? Do I quit my job now?
I'd say Cloudflare has good documentation, but would be beaten by the likes of HashiCorp. Cloudflare can bounce you around a lot in their documentation. Jumping from their base docs, to GitHub to Docker Hub. In some cases I've found conflicting versioning / information between those sites.

Don't get me wrong, Cloudflare does a nice job. So many vendors today don't have a documentation forward perspective. I recently worked at a startup that had basically no documentation and found that the product was poorly designed and did not work as they advertised it. At this point in my career one of the first things I'm looking for when considering a product or organization is good documentation. Skipping that validation has almost always bitten me. A lack thereof seems to indicate taking a shortcut and broader issues that may be lurking.
This is a better calculator, because it also supports GPT-4:

https://tiktokenizer.vercel.app/

Not sure, why they don't support GPT-4 on their own website.
I enjoy collecting little things like this to annoy the grammar gatekeepers. Why say "regardless" when "irregardless" means the same thing but also annoys prescriptivists? "Ironical" instead of "ironic" and "less" instead of "fewer".

Now that I know, "comprised of" fits in this category, it's definitely going to be a part of the everyday lexicon.
It's always more productive to come into the office they say. Then they hire half your team in a country with a time zone that is 12 hours off.
Exactly AutoGPT is exactly what he is describing but I’m still lost as to what the verbiage is then. Is that the singularity?
Arc Boats, like Tesla but for boats
What about the sim farm I use to delegate my SMS OTP codes to?
No VOIP numbers don't work for everything, no using the same SIM card doesn't work, no I don't want to worry about running dozens of phones with batteries and no I'm not even sending messages.

Local TOTP key as a second factor should be more standard.

Especially if I'm already paying for a service you shouldn't need SMS as a crappy veiled proxy for some human verification.

Supposed to pretend like this doesn't just force people to use more phones?
8k vs 32k context.
This is just an added perk as far as I'm concerned.
Most of the use case is spamming people. There are very few other uses for something like this[1].

A2P is also a US specific thing?

1. https://m.aliexpress.com/item/1005004866582019.html?spm=a2g0...
But the 7 train is part of the subway system. I wouldn't really recommend taking a bus in most cases even if google thinks you'll shave a minute or two off your travel time.
I don't know much about space or the ISS so this might be a naive question. But why wouldn't NASA persue a "ship of Theseus" approach? What I mean is the ISS is modular, why wouldn't it be feasible to keep taking on and decommissioning modules? I would assume this is because the ISS has a "core module" that all other modules tack on to, and that module is getting old? Right?
Yeah but still hackers can abuse SEO and direct visits to their pages. If you are not careful you might accidentally download a malicious binary.
>Wish I had an invite.

They have an IRC chat room where you can request an invite[0]. They typically ask if you have a personal website, git repo, interesting projects, etc when inviting people.

[0] https://lobste.rs/chat
The alphabet contains five vowels is a completely different statement from the alphabet is comprised of five vowels.
Show HN: CRM Services as a Monthly Subscription
Offering CRM services to businesses who can't afford or don't want to hire a CRM team but still could benefit from it. Choose a package depending on your needs and increase your CLV, user engagement, and reduce the churn.
This is done for GEO satellites, but as mentioned in other comments here, it's impossible for LEO satellites such as the ISS.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_orbits

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graveyard_orbit

https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2008/03/Mitigation...
I don't agree with your 1984 analogy at all.

A better source might be George Orwell's actual, explicit opinions on politics and the English language:

https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwel...

Orwell certainly did not take an "anything goes" approach to language, which is essentially what you and others argue for, in the mistaken belief that you're somehow striking a blow at totalitarianism. From my perspective, your position is much closer to the Newspeak ethos than that of someone who actually cares about correct usage.
I spend on average around 10 hours per video. (1h ideation, 4h filming, 5h editing+thumbnail). I make at least a video a week, often 2 videos. How much time you spend per video will be up to you. There are successful youtubers who spend just 8h per video, while other successful youtubers spend A LOT more.

I think of every video like a lottery ticket. I know a certain percentage of them will become "hits", ie. give me 100k+ views. And I know the more videos I make, the more of these hits I get. I also know that over time I will get better and better at my craft, and increase the likelyhood of any video to become successful. I never had a schedule, and I don't beat myself up if I don't post a particular week. I just keep working on my videos a little every day, and post the video as soon as it is done. It has resulted in 1-2 videos per week over time.

I know that it is probably best to keep a schedule with strict times, because then the audience will show up once they learn the schedule. But I am always too eager and can't bring myself to not post immediately, and it has worked okay for me :) Most important thing I think is that you don't take long breaks of several months. I think your audience cares about consistency, but not the algorithm.
Typically at this level the scales will be performed in more difficult variations, e.g. the right hand plays starting on the third or 6th note of the scale.

There are also cases of concert pianists who notoriously refused to practice scales for these kinds of exams.
This belief couldn’t be further from the truth. Let's bust the myth!
Yours is a snapshot of the 8k token context taken on March 14th.
I will say that word is always confusing, perhaps the #1 example.

Because with other classic examples, such as the verb "to table" meaning the opposite thing in the US and UK, you can at least always figure it out from context (if not from the accent, ha). And we know that "inflammable" is never used to mean fireproof.

But the two opposite meanings of "nonplussed", there's very often zero contextual indication as to which meaning is intended. And both meanings are used frequently, so it's in this total unresolved limbo state.

For me, it's the one word I won't use at all, precisely for this reason. There's simply no way to be properly understood.
I really appreciate the well documented, well commented code.

It's usually hard to find energy to do this on personal projects, if nothing else that aspect makes GBT coding worth it to me

Especially in this domain, most of the pytorch projects are impossible to read with the lack of comments and obscure variable names
With all due respect, I am a native English speaker and I agree with the GP. I wouldn't go as far as the Wikipedian in question (I surely have far better uses of my time than to make many tens of thousands of edits over a trivial nitpick), but the end result does read better and I'd have a hard time justifying a reversion of such an edit.

Also, considering that plenty of non-native English speakers read the English Wikipedia, there is plenty of value in the English writing in the English Wikipedia being maximally clear without sacrificing the intended meaning of the text. Dismissing feedback out of hand on the basis of "well the person giving the feedback ain't a native English speaker" misses the point of Wikipedia being a resource for everyone.

Broadening this beyond Wikipedia, the English language itself "is comprised of" countless words and grammatical structures yanked straight out of other languages, often by non-native speakers importing features of their native languages for all sorts of reasons. Knowing this history, I hereby authorize non-native speakers to critique the language and elements thereof; it's just as much their language as it is mine, and they therefore have just as much a right to it as I do.
That would take way to much energy for little benefit. They expect the ISS to burn up in the atmosphere so there wouldn't be a safety issue to people/things on earth.
> My best attempt, perhaps GPTs can do better

I doubt it's been trained on that, here is what it told me:

> I'm sorry, but the phrase "Alttan ittirmeli üstten tüttürmeli çok oturgaçlı getirgeçli götürgeç" appears to be a nonsensical combination of Turkish words. It doesn't have a clear meaning or context.
What's your usage and stated use case? I got access for my company account, but I'm pretty sure that's because we've built and shipped product using their API.
Your interpretation of these facts is rather loose.
What is "WP"?
That’s correct, we have a couple of projects that use DNS TXT for storing data and JSON and TXT records are not a good fit. My description above references compactdata, which as you pointed out is the new name for MODL which uses to live at https://www.MODL.uk
Ah, good catch, it's actually closer to 8 tokens per LoC with GPT4's toktoken, so about twice as good. Some quick testing suggests that's mostly down to better whitespace handling.
Are there any profiles of Wikipedia editors? I have to admit that they seem like another breed to me. I don't even bother editing Wikipedia, not that I ever did in quantity, just as I saw things. Everytime I have, even to correct some clear error, it is usually immediately reversed or removed altogether (things as simple as correcting the title of something). They have very strange conventions and their own Wiki language in terms of how they speak in comments and edit articles.
Not at all. That's the beauty of being an influencer - it is really hard to copy what you do, including personality and all. Also, it takes years to build a following and a personal brand. Sometimes people upload copies of my videos, but youtube has a good system to notify me and take them down.
A Linux Bug Stops Vivado from Recognizing FPGA
Yeah there's really three options here... Throw everything in context, fine tune, or add external search a la RETRO.

The latter is definitely the cheapest option; updates are trivial.
You don’t need 2-3 cars living rurally either. My wife and I dropped down to 1 vehicle a year ago with her being a stay at home mom and myself working remote.
Honestly for the firms that would use it, for example finance or legal, it's very reasonable.
I have no idea why this is getting downvoted. Make a case, if you disagree.
“Associated with” would have been a stronger claim than “probable cause of”.
Because Watson was meh, whereas cgp-4 is almost scarily 'smart' and certainly entertaining.
Unless you have kids. The school systems are generally better in the burbs.
There’s a number that change over time; awful and terrible for example. Very old hymns talk about how awful and terrible God is, for example.
Once they start renovating office buildings into housing everyone will flock to the cities. Most people don't want to live in suburbs. Even many of the people who think they do would be happier in a small town surrounded by farmland or nature.
I guess we need a PostgreSQL backend.
hey qq who decides what correct is
I don't think comparing a tiny island to an enormous country makes sense. Speed limits are far lower all over the UK simply because they can be when you're not covering as much distance.

It's far more usual to drive from e.g. California to Arizona than it is to go from even London to the Scottish Highlands (because there's barely anything up there).

It's hard to find an accurate comparison in Europe for that reason. Even places that are quite big (tall) like the Nordics are basically unpopulated in the north so there's nowhere to go.
I think this website is a good a argument that browsers give way too much data.
Luckily brave obfuscates phone model, cpu and so on.
Comprises is not comprised.
A Twitter ad triggered “Hey, Siri” for me yesterday, so these vocal prompts are generally pretty dumb.
I am glad you can see values in Asian culture, South and East Asians have respect for others specially elders, parents and take care of them.
The problem with your sentence is you are simply misspelling what a person said. The comprise example, they are actually saying comprise. It is a different word!
I'm not the parent commenter, but the friction point for me is the slowness when typing the first few characters in an interactive search (I have a large history). I think the searches are synchronous with each keystroke, right? It would feel a lot faster if each keystroke could cancel an in progress search instead of waiting for it to finish.

In fzf, there is no noticeable lag when typing.
Ancient viruses in the human genome can help fight cancer