skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Except you can use your own keys? Nothing stops you from signing the stuff yourself (other comments in this thread link to a step by step guide!)
It varies a lot by country. France is unbelievably bad.
that's really interesting. thanks for trying it. yeah, it doesn't seem to have a consistent notion of time and hallucinates regularly.
> Until I can spin up a docker image capable of the same as OpenAI in hetzner for 30 bucks a month - it’s not in the same league.

Yes, you are right

That’s irrelevant to the point of this, which is about the dynamics of the market over a longer window than “what is available to use immediately today”, because a “moat” is a different thing than “a current lead”.
It's at least used for snorkeling diesel submarines.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prairie-Masker
Good. The opposite decision would have made making music an exercise in getting sued, as there are only so many chord progressions, and of those, only so many that actually sound coherent or musical.
If you need to physically get into a device with CM4 or rPi to reset it....

...and you are malicious actor wanting to put a backdoored system in

...you could just get the new rPi in it, that's not blocked.
Tests can pass before they are merged but fail after merge. Tests can also regress over time and become flaky.
I presume you're talking about Nitro. That's not a permanent custom discriminator. As soon as you stop paying for Nitro, it randomizes again.
How is there any distinction between paying a fee for more horsepower, or just buying a fast car to begin with?
By principles, it's hard to accept this and similarly oppressive measures. But the schools have to cope with the reality, which is that there is a serious problem with gun violence and that they are not in a position to address it on a societal level.

There has to be a way back. Even with firearms being available and more easily in the (increasingly distant) past, there wasn't a problem to nearly this degree. What has changed? Not asking for navel gazing, there must be legitimate research in the topic by now.
I definitely did a bunch of Prolog in my CMPT216 class back in undergrad and I hadn't really thought of SQL as an alternative until today. I agree with you it's easier to "run programs" in Prolog, and a lot of the concepts from the class would have been more difficult to map to SQL than Prolog (e.g. writing a Sudoku solver in Prolog was mind-melting in a good way, writing a Sudoku solver in SQL would probably be mind-melting in a bad way). The one thing that SQL does have going for it though is that there's a ton of tooling for getting practical real-world data into it.

I would absolutely love to take a set of logic/set-oriented problems and solve them both in Prolog and SQL, just to see which ones are ergonomic in each language. Maybe this summer at the cabin...
A usual programmer doesn’t need most features of C++ but there are many important:

Generic-programming with templates, a usable std::string, smart-pointers, references, the howl standard-library (streams, file access, containers, threads).

The controversial ones seem to be exceptions and classes. Exceptions affect programming flow, exception safety is very hard and the runtime costs are an issue depending on the environment. Class and inheritance are complicated feature, operator overloading is one of the best stuff I’ve seen. But I can understand why many programmers don’t want handle all the special rules involving classes.
So this guy is now S3. All of S3
This will incentive Congress to delegate more than they do now. Instead of line items for each major expense in a budget bill, they'll just assign X billions of dollars to Y agency to parcel out as the agency director wishes.
OSM is a database of map data (streets/buildings/etc), so satellite and street view imagery is outside of its scope. Individual map applications that use OSM data might also support satellite imagery (and some do, like OSMAnd).
> Just a little nitpick: Your link to vger.kernel.org leads to an https address, where I was only able to find a website at the http://vger.kernel.org address.

I didn't type a URL; it's just a bare FQDN. Is it a clickable link for you? If so, not by my doing.
The test was conducted as such:

>With these two evaluation sets, we conducted a blind pairwise comparison by asking approximately 100 evaluators on Amazon Mechanical Turk platform to compare the quality of model outputs on these held-out sets of prompts. In the ratings interface, we present each rater with an input prompt and the output of two models. They are then asked to judge which output is better (or that they are equally good) using criteria related to response quality and correctness.

No, it's not just memorising shakespeare, real humans interacted with the models and rated them.
:)
Yes indeed! Always happy to discuss suggestions for new intrinsics via Github issues.
License text: https://huggingface.co/spaces/bigcode/bigcode-model-license-.... Attachment A at the very end has the usage restrictions.
The USB standard includes a method of detecting how much power your cable can handle, so this seems like a non-issue unless Apple decides that standards shouldn't apply to them.
Car companies already and always have made money from continued support of their products. Car maintenance and repairs and spare parts and the work already cost money. So, not even remotely the same.

You can complain about any company that wants to continuously make money for nothing in return. Just look at ink printers. Rent seeking sure is attractive, yes.

Nobody owes you anything. There are MANY jobs that deserve such high salaries far more, just try anything related to caring for sick and/or old people. It's just that "deserve" has got nothing to do with anything!

Also, look at all the other countries and companies. That kind of complaint to me sounds more like a multi-millionaire looking at the even grander mansion next door and claiming they deserve at least that much too and that the world is so unfair to them. You picked the very, very few where some people make even more. It's hardly all the tens of thousands of employees of the FAANGs that all make a few hundred thousand, just a small fraction.

Cars also are not nearly as innovative. They are much farther along their product cycle. Oh sure, they did a lot of work, but the car still uses about as much fuel as it always did, and gets you barely any faster than it always did from A to B. But all the entertainment you get now! And all the electronics! Yeah okay. But the end product still doesn't deliver that much more value compared to a 1970s car. Some of them were actually more comfortable, easier to use, and easier to look out of. I do understand that there's been a lot of work on safety too since then, and that deaths went down. But I didn't claim there was zero innovation, did I? Only that you compared yourself with the latest and greatest new tech, such as AI, and in that elevated niche you again picked their highest paid people, and that seriously is your chosen comparison?

Oh and when we are looking at all the innovation in cars, may I point to the discussions - right here on HN too - about software, UIs, and cheating German car makers (I'm German too by the way), and how German car makers are big losers in China, and quality issues in German cars (https://newsingermany.com/german-car-manufacturers-fail-us-s...)?
They understand they are not. People like you and me who hate this are the minority. It will keep happening more and more no matter what you do.

eat arbys.
Let’s not kid ourselves. Americans love their cars because they want short term convenience.

Cars trips in the US are, in their vast majority, short and between common places like grocery stores, gyms, schools, etc.
Toyota already sells that. They even include a gas range extender for free with purchase!

In reality the CO2-adjusted eMPG of most EVs purchased today won’t outpace the Prius for the expected life of the car.
I'm surprised the article doesn't show "the picture": https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2021/05/19/kent-state-shooti...
Nice, an ad hominem attack.

We can't all afford to devote our lives to activism. But change starts with education and we can be educators when these topics come up. That's not useless.
Does anyone have a suggestion to have vim mode key bindings for chrome or firefox URL bar?
Those precedents in hardware are not exactly good. And the more expensive a product is, the less acceptable artificial locks are.

With software, the entire model is buying functionality, and then you can use it on the hardware of your choice. And it has to work that way. It's worth keeping in mind but it's not directly comparable to a hardware purchase.
Most phones that allow you to root them just display message about it on the start, I think that's far better solution if you still want to keep the "trusted chain" but not make device into a landfill when user wants to do something else with it. At very least for devices with user-facing UI
Because most of the free market theory that most normal people believe is based on the assumption of perfect competition[1]. However, that almost never actually occurs in the real world and even ends up being impossible in most cases.

For example, there is always going to be a huge barrier to entry for automakers. They need to invest an enormous amount of time and money in design, factories, raw materials, labor, etc before they can deliver an actual car. This barrier protects automakers from feeling the full repercussions of their anti-consumer practices because it is extremely difficult for a new pro-consumer competitor to enter the market.

When we remove that assumption of perfect competition, the whole free market theory starts to fall apart. A well functioning free market requires power to be balanced between all parties, otherwise whoever has the most power can end up corrupting it and using their power advantage to grab even more money and/or power.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_competition
I also would like to believe that, but there are countless examples which show the difference. Companies have no time to figure out which of the open source offerings is the best. Even worse, they don’t have the time to switch from one project to the other or back to OpenAI if OpenAI releases a new state-of-the-art model.
My guess is that their assets are similarly exposed like SVB or First Republic's. Any long term asset they hold has just lost a massive amount of value and so they need to make up for it by taking the ECB rate and not passing it on to customers.

The fee banks that do pass it on will only do so for newly deposited money.
> As though "hey maybe these shots which are known to cause a lot of people heart problems ..."

Let me stop you're right there. This isn't true. The rest of your argument follows from this faulty premise.

> There were 1,626 cases of myocarditis among more than 354 million primary doses given between December 2020 and August 2021. This research was published in the journal JAMA on January 25, 2022. [1]

That is objectively and subjectively not "a lot." That's 1626 out of 354,000,000. 0.00045%. 0.45/100,000.

> There were 37 cases of myocarditis among more than 81 million booster doses given between September 22, 2021, and February 6, 2022. This research was published by the CDC on February 11, 2022. [2]

That is objectively and subjectively not "a lot." That's 37 out of 81,000,000. 0.000045%. 0.045/100,000.

The reality is with 5.56B people vaccinated, if it had any effects, it would be clearly and plainly visible in population-level data.

You are wrong, the monitoring is extensive, the vaccine is safe, and this is settled science.

ergo, MSG.

[1] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788346

[2] https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7107e1.htm
Heh, that's awesome. And I thought my 20 was bad. I love these lights so much.
Information about the authors is in the report, and on the web.

It's not possible to debunk every bit of nonsense written about nuclear energy. And often better not to dignify it by trying. Here goes anyway:

A reactor is a can filled with fuel. Per unit of energy liberated and modulo every other degree of freedom in the design, the size of the can has nothing to do with the amount of fuel or its disposition.

The size of the can does have something to do with the size of the can, per unit of energy liberated. That's because volume scales as radius cubed while surface area scales as radius squared, and the energy depends only on the volume.

So in that, the authors have a point. But the details they provide have little to do with it, and some are misleading or wrong. And why we should care, or how much we should care, about the amount of cans is not investigated.

The result is that there's nothing in this report anyone could use to inform a decision.

Edit: It has been disputed elsewhere...

https://www.powermag.com/small-modular-reactors-arent-diffic...

https://www.anl.gov/article/argonne-releases-small-modular-r...

https://neutronbytes.com/2022/05/31/stanfords-questionable-s...
Yes, and it's not only the government, it's authorities, i.e. those with power over others everywhere that wants control over the flow of information. In the government. In the police. The workplace. The family. And the family is often where the absolute worst tyranny occurs - towards children - where our natural rights are violated the most - and this is accepted as 'normal' by our sick society.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalization_of_deviance
Silicon Valley’s Troubles Are Reshaping Venture Capital
If/when EU starts considering some move it is usually already too late and there are mostly half measures proposed anyway.

You can't decree inovation in central planning economy that EU is at heart..
The controversy of using the clean architecture in Golang
Definitely a tradeoff: much fewer companies, but the ones that are left are higher quality if they are seeking out that sort of thing. It really depends on what you're looking for.

I settled into a role of research software engineer, where I do both applied research and development, applying a lot of compiler-ish stuff to different domains within cybersecurity, such as building out control flow graphs from binaries, thinking about how to instrument assembly code efficiently, fast pattern matching, and static analysis, where I am currently. The role fits me like a glove, but it isn't for everyone. In my job search, I started at, "I want a job doing compiler work," and eventually broadened scope a few times until I landed on, "I want a job where compiler-type approaches are on the table of possibilities." This offers a wider variety of work, which I like.

I can discuss more over email (check my HN profile) if you'd like, but most of what I know is US-centric due to how funding works for these types of research. Larger orgs like FAANGs also have it, but the pool is much more competitive, as you'd expect.
> One person being harmed cannot stop a program that reduces harm in aggregate.

I guess this is the trolley problem in action but do we actually think all humans are the same? Would you divert the trolley from 2 90 year olds to 1 16 year old?
I was disappointed with STD S3 & 4 and Picard. I think Lower Decks has good story plots and characters, but the language and dialogues are insufferable.

Sci-Fi discusses social and philosophical topics without the connotations that tie them to reality, which allows for greater artistic freedom and a clearer view on the topic.

SNW follows that tradition. It is fun, lighthearted, with good acting (Anson Mount, Ethan Peck and Jess Bush have a good chemistry) without becoming silly. The story is about exploration, making first contact and learning sometimes easy, sometimes hard lessons. Episodes are only loosely connected, so it's a return to syndicated TV.
i do throw a paywall on most of my projects. i'll both probably remove the paywall and this project entirely. but i was curious to see how people behaved with this bot and my question is answered! still no one has compared it to character AI which is what i was most interested in
That would be a mess for interop with 8, 16, and 32-bit targets. What size should the length be? What happens when you exceed it? Nowadays you can just 32-bit all the things and ignore most range issues. That luxury didnt exist in the 80s.
They mention 'readline' under 'shells', but it's really more general than that. For instance, you can configure plain commandline GDB to use vim key bindings that way, and any other program that uses readline.

Similar can be done for 'editline' (a readline alternative sometimes seen on BSD systems).
Studies on cannabis withdrawal not behind a paywall

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9110555/
Not particularly as of recent.
How can I pay for food or my electricity bill with HackerNewsCoin?

Enough with this bullshit please.
or, crazy thought, pass the cost savings of not having to manage multiple trimlines onto the consumer instead of trying to make a quick buck by artificially borking the motor.
Well, eventually, better models will be made and they can be used locally
Show HN: Narr – Download Netflix audio for sampling
Priority should probably be in legislating 280 horsepower in passenger vehicles out of existence.
I know. But my understanding was that `"xyz"` is an array of characters so that these two would have the same representation in memory:

char word[] = {'x', 'y', 'z', '\0'}; // sizeof(word) = 4, sizeof(*word) = 1
char word[] = "xyz"; // sizeof(word) = 4, sizeof(*word) = 1

What I did not realize was that the above two are not the same as this:

char *word = "xyz"; // sizeof(word) = 8, sizeof(*word) = 1
A) When IMHO the underlying argument is not quite honest.

B) When it comes from an interested party.

C) When there's enough of A and B that I feel it's intentional.

The underlying argument here would apply to some extremely profitable existing closed source software, so it's obviously not complete. Even closed source software which is strictly inferior manages to find some very profitable moats.

As for the source, it comes from Google Research, which has done a very poor job of using their knowledge to benefit Google. The article downplays the failures (we couldn't have done anything differently, but it doesn't matter anyway since Open Source will consume all!), and doesn't even think about productization.

The latter does give me a little bit of doubt: the article could also be emblematic of Google Research's failures and not 100% spin...
The quality delta is so huge that it's in a different league.

Replit's model seems to have focused on being cheap to train and run.
StarCoder seems to be vastly better on quality.
That is possible, but at that point you need a integrations/release team to babysit the builds and make sure everything integrates back together cleanly.

The last thing I want to do is have my build broken by someone on another team and then have to track them down and babysitting the revert. That is easily an hour of my time wasted.
Ok fair enough. I suspect that's a pretty non-standard/rarely-used feature though. If you learn SQL you likely won't encounter this and I still contest the idea that SQL is a good entry into the logic paradigm.

SQL and Prolog are both relational. That's very unique to both. But SQL is all about querying databases. Prolog can also be used and understood as a database querying language but it's also very strong for

- parsers

- interpreters

- expert systems

- solving combinatorial problems

If you really want to you can probably use SQL for that too. Or any language for that matter. But going out and learning SQL won't naturally expose you to these applications and how well the logic paradigm lends itself to them.
I dont want to change from bash to zsh.
I don't know what Fish is
I disagree. Youtube model has shown that multiple people can produce videos and still earn profit from it. There are thousands of niches that creators can target which big studios don't even touch because masses might not be interested in it.

We can a Big Bang without all the stupid romantic stuff. We can have different ending versions of Game of Thrones. So much stuff is never made because it takes so resources to produce them.

I think the market will only grow when this technology is available to everybody.
This game is my favorite thing on the internet. It is an amazing cause and effect explanation of a complex concept brought to a simple level. In a world where it feels like tech is ripping apart our social fabric Nicky Case (ncase) has shown us what tech can do to help mend it.

If you clicked on this page hoping for a discussion or having skipped the game, the game is really worth playing.

Here is some more of Nicky Case's stuff like this: https://explorabl.es/social/
Ask HN: Any nerds want to meet up in Tribeca?
I ended up planning a trip to Tribeca, NYC. Hungry Ghost Coffee at 1pm, Saturday?
Relatively recent. Basically a big land donation from the Burt's Bees co-founder finally helped made it happen. And, yeah, although the National Parks tend to be "better" (i.e. more compelling), the distinction is mostly a political one. (I see they allow hunting in certain areas which also probably helped move it over the finish line.) At least in the vaguely recent past, most properties become National Monuments before they become parks. Acadia was Lafayette National Monument before it became a national park.

I haven't been up there yet. Soon. But like a lot of Maine lands in that general area, it's probably more paddling/fishing oriented than hiking (at least if you're into summits). (Even a lot of Baxter other than Katahdin is like that.)
Enron was very charitable.

https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/news/enron-s-philanthropy...
Fascinating that any superficially for-profit entity would want to compete against something that has never earned one single dollar from revenue production. I find the whole industry quite unusual. It is possible that there are engineers who started at GE (or Hitachi) decades ago working on the simplified BWR, worked on it their whole careers, and retired without anyone ever building one.
What makes you think open ai won't look at the FOSS improvements, include them in their tech, and make their GPU farm way cheaper, rendering their service even more competitive?

Not to mention it's easy to run stable diffusion, but midjourney is still a good business. I can run sd on my laptop, I still pay for midjourney because it's convenient, the out of the box experience is better than any competition, and it keeps improving.
I think you've failed to consider how impractical even doing a SQL dump can be on a large-ish database, forget about the reloading time.
I don’t remember this but, knowing some of those involved, I completely believe it.
Still haven't answered what's wrong with incels
Thanks for this overview of the market, be a great blog post!
Artist posts letter signed by 1k luminaries urging curbs on “vampirical” AI
> The best solution is for people to exercise good judgment.

Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement.

Guess which phase we're in now.
No, you’re understanding correctly. None of that is desirable.

The baby is dead and should be disposed of.
Everything is caused by something. I posit that everything is not caused by one thing.
>What are the drawbacks of quantizing though?

A 0.01% loss in quality for a 4x speed up and 4x less VRAM/RAM requirement.

90GB models now fit and run on a $600 consumer video card with quality so similar the difference is only detectable on hours long automated tests with tens of thousands of iterations.
I have not! thanks for letting me know, I'll give it a try.
I am aware of warp. I guess I could use it but I am looking for something that integrates with gnome-terminal/konsole or iTerm