skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A prime example of nice c++. Operator/ is also used as a path separator in std::filesystem: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/filesystem/path/operator_s...
I'm not sure that is a very minority POV.

I'm not sure about "much more than any other media outlet" but for mainstream non-controversial topics it's probably pretty accurate. It may not be comprehensible for anyone who isn't already an expert, it's maybe pretty thin if the person/subject isn't part of the modern tech and hobbyist zeitgeist, but it's probably not a bad starting point especially if it has a lot of good cites.
Ask HN: Best tech stack/process for soloprenuer to build and ship quickly?
I want to build and ship a new web application every week, I want to learn the process of thinking about something and shipping it. It doesnt need to make money, I am learning to ship.

what is the best stack, advice and process for getting this done?
I see a lot of replies here talking about asking GPT questions in a domain an individual is an expert in, and being disappointed in the results. I think this is missing the point a bit. The impressive part of GPT isn’t that it’s an expert in anything, but that it’s better than an average human on many topics. For example - someone brought up GPT not comprehending homomorphic encryption fully. Well, I have a MS in CS and have been professionally developing software for 15 years, and I’ve even READ articles on homomorphic encryption multiple times, but I can’t articulate what it is very well. I just remember it’s inefficient and infeasible at this time.

The thing that is mind blowing to me is that I can talk with GPT about basically any topic and it can help get me in the right direction, I can talk with it to get clarity on anything that’s confusing, and it’s like a way to collaborate on thought without a human. That’s mindblowing to me!
>I work for a larger company that builds and maintains the electrical grid in many European countries.

Also European here. The problem for EV charging is gonna be the last mile, not the grid. Upgrading the grid is the easiest part. The charging points are the painful part to fix that nobody seems to have an answer to or want to talk about in the first place.

In my city, most of the residential streets where people live (in flats) are full of parked cars on both sides of the street. How will all those cars charge once they switch to EV? Will the already narrow sidewalks be full of charging stations next to each parking spot, and will pedestrians constantly be tripping over the charging cables? How will this work?

Currently all EV owners here are well off people who own their houses in the suburbs or in rural areas, and can install their own chargers at home for their EVs, but how will the people living in flats who have to park on the street charge their cars? Effectively those who aren't well off to own their own houses are penalized by the lack of EV charging infrastructure where they live.

Ideally, we'd get rid of private cars in the city completely and replace them with better public transport and cycling infrastructure, but looking at the real life facts, there's no political will to push car owners out of car ownership, and car owners are by far a majority of the voting population, even among the low earners. And upgrading the public transport and making it run frequent enough to make people give up cars ownership voluntarily would most likely make tickets too expensive for car owners to justify. And public transports is already subsidized.

Edit 1: Also, regarding the last mile charging infrastructure stations, another one of their weaknesses compared to filling up with gas at a gas station, is that they suck, the billing & payment systems sucks, the UX sucks and they often have faults or are broken, making them unusable or seeing people struggle to get them to work. MKBHD did a video on this proving this point and is definitely worth a watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BA2qJKU8t2k

Edit 2: Another issue with EV adoption is the EV range and charging durations. Many Europeans hop into their cars in the summer and drive their family to the south of Europe hundreds or thousands of km. The range of a cheap EV still is subpar compared to a cheap ICE and so is the charging duration VS the refueling duration, making long holiday trips by EV a nightmare compared to a ICE car. We'd need a lot more charging points around these routes to cover summer or winter holiday trafic, and by a lot more, I mean a lot a lot more. Even some gas stations can have 15-20 minute queues for a 3 minute tank refuel at peak holiday season in summer or winter near popular routes like Austria, Italy or Croatia, so imagine what EV charging queues would look like when a charge easily needs 30 minutes instead of 3.
It's hard to find any important difference between the two.
No, is it worth a try? I didn’t see a lot of hype about it so I didn’t try it.
Another thought. Awarding parents of very young children more votes than parents of older children is giving more weight to inexperienced parents who are most concerned with immediate childcare needs than more experienced parents who are starting to think about the lifelong thriving of their soon-to-be-adult children.
>She can shut out the world during a screeching subway ride, hear her friends in noisy bars during a night out and even understand her students better by switching to “mumbly kids.”

Huh, I wonder if they could help with my auditory processing disorder.
Offtopic, but I agree. There were the times when I jumped to help anyone, but nowadays I can't hold the hand for everyone.
Apparently they could sink their double-hulled canoes into the water a little if storms hit so they didn’t get the full brunt of the waves.
Wikipedia is entirely controlled by activist super minorities.

Articles are often heavily censored or simply biased.

Maybe the whole internet is?

But I find myself relying on Wikipedia less and less. I think chat searches are probably the final nail in the coffin for me directly access it.
What's the cryptographic definition of a "backroom deal"? Can I do it with Ed25519?
Yeah, it is puzzling that the key was able to be leaked in the first place. The key should have been in an HSM.
Starting a New Community for Veterans
Dang, this is so cool. Thanks a lot for the articles!
Discord's already VC funded, which has always made me a bit leery, but they seemed to have a profitable business model with nitro subs.
A program is neither lazy nor motivated. It does precisely what it is programmed to do.

I would push back on the question, as well as a myriad of implied premises behind it...
I wonder if that could work on my 1200km-long trip. It'd have to be a truly pan-European company and network. So far we don't even have telecoms like that - I switch between 3 different national networks during the trip... But on the other hand, the Tesla Supercharger network spans the route, so why not I guess.
End of an era for sure. To rhyme with another response on this post, another phase in IBM's retreat from public consciousness.

I do think maintaining some brand lustre in consumer-facing products for lines of business where it at all makes sense is a potent recipe for excitement in enterprise etc.
Compare to Google's here:

https://jeremykun.com/2023/02/13/googles-fully-homomorphic-e...

It's a really fun write up. I prefer the syntax of Google's. But Zama is doing great work.

I really enjoyed the podcast with them here. It clarified a lot for me about the intersection of FHE and ZK.

https://zeroknowledge.fm/248-2/
„Many writers use this phrase to aggrandize a sentence -- to intentionally make it longer and more sophisticated“

This has to be the perfect example for the usage of the word aggrandize itself.
I don't fault anyone for being upset they have to find a new job, but I have justified disdain for what amount to horse farriers who want to ban the automobile.
You just didn't happen to hit that particular thing in that time, there'll be a long list like that for all coders. The subset of coding and computer science anyone interacts with will always be small compared to the entirety of the field.
Which is why we should ignore them and write however we like.

Note that I'm not saying we should write poorly, or deliberately sloppily, just it's at the author or editor's preference.
This came up in a college course I took.

Traditional Polynesian boats were operating alongside modern technology in the 1950s and 1969s. The Polynesian boats put up a better safety record!

So yeah, they really were good at navigating. And to think, they did it lying on their back! The cues that they were using were from the swell, the stars, and birds. You feel the swell most clearly lying down. The other two are above you.
There's mokutil to add your own key.
That may not be enough to go on, to be frank, as your app may ultimately determine your requirements.

Does the world really need a new app per week, or a few good ones every so often?
We leverage many third party C++ libraries with complex templates, concepts, and constexpr expressions that seem to require lots of CPU to compile. We've found unity builds to be almost 3X faster, so we make it the default for both developer and CI jobs.

But we keep a separate CI job that checks the non-unity build, so developers have to add the right #include statements and can't accidentally reference file-scoped functions from other files. While working on a given library or project, developers often disable the unity build for just that project to reduce incremental build times. It seems to offer the benefits of both approaches.

Precompiled headers don't give nearly the same speedup. We're excited for C++ modules of course, but we're trying to temper any expectations that modules will improve build speed.
Hey, the second amendment says the right to bear arms shall not be infringed, it doesn't say it exists!
English is a programming language now. That is what is being demonstrated here. Code is still being written; it just looks more like instructions given to a human programmer.

Eventually, human languages will be the only high-level programming languages. Everything else will be thought of the way we currently think of assembly code: a tool of last resort, used only in unusual circumstances when nothing else will do.

And it looks like "Eventually" means "In a year or two."
There was a few years ago where everyone was adding "stories" when unwanted, like Whatsapp etc. I'd hope not, but I wouldn't put it past them (after all they did "stages" to copy clubhouse and made it very prominent for a few months until it turned out clubhouse was all noise and no staying power)
Trial of Ketamine Masked by Surgical Anesthesia in Depressed Patients
>All of those words mean to use.

"The teachers were unable to utilize the new computers" means something different from "The teachers were unable to use the new computers"
People know keys, people eventually leak keys. It always happened.
Discriminators are random for non nitro-users. And if you stop paying you don't even get to keep one...
Oh no! Here, please, backdoor my OS with a kernel anticheat -- anything that saves me from cheaters in the current bideo game of the month! D:
Because security is a cost center and business people do not give a shit.
It looks like it uses a neat custom model and it’s probably easier to setup.
> Same with the Pangolin scales for used for "libido enhancement"

The second order impacts of Pfizer/Viagra as a savior of endangered species is wild
These days it’s all about Postgres, Clickhouse, Snowflake.
I was not ready for the sperm twist on the wet bulb temperature…
Grammar is a linguistic study and more than just "like, a general guideline."

For example, "you're" and "your" are two very different words.

Let people obsess. They're not hurting you.
Philosophy is boring so it doesn't really play well in political discussions. I agree though, when we argue about something like AI without any kind of philosophical underpinning the argument is hollow.

AI is "good" in the sense of what goal? Becoming a space-faring civilization? Advancing all technology as fast as possible? Building a stable utopia for life on earth?
> In fact, you'll probably have hard time convincing rural folks to switch to EVs.

I don't think it'd be as hard as you suggest. Even grid power (let alone off-grid power) is far more accessible to even the ruralest of ruralites than a gas station. Another decades' worth of improvements on vehicle range/horsepower/affordability and off-grid power generation/storage/affordability would be more than enough to convince folks that EVs are a sufficiently-practical choice.
Chrome states that the new version of Language Reactor has been disabled, because the extenstion can read and change data on all amazon sites.
The implication is that Discord can surveil you (or help a government surveil you), not that your chats will be leaked to the world directly.

Discord "servers" are just instances of Discord on Discord Inc's cloud. Discord never claims that they are private in the sense of 'sovereign', only that you can moderate them yourself.

Discord openly states in the TOS that their "Trust and Safety" team can see literally everything you do (channel messages, DMs, attachments, etc) at any time.
Even in SC1 you would have this, just with different combinations of 1, l, |, ¦ and I, which were not nearly as distinct in the font the game used.
I would assume it’s the same as book translations, the point isn’t to translate it directly but in a way that makes sense in the target language. Although maybe a lot of subtitles for lesser TV and movies don’t have a lot of human input and the handler just goes with the softwares suggestion a lot of the time.
Ask HN: Worst Luxury beliefs amongst tech workers?
I realized when working on a Youtube video that although alot of my tech friends were liberal, they lived conservative-ish lives. They got married, owned homes and investment properties. They were socially liberal and fiscally conservative. They also pushed luxury beliefs that they did not even follow. Who else has noticed this?
I started working on a CPU that was designed for FHE about 10 years ago, inspired by the ShapeCPU paper around that time [1] [2]. I've been waiting for someone to make a better gate-to-FHE compiler for some time.

[1] https://github.com/mmastrac/oblivious-cpu
[2] https://hcrypt.com/shape-cpu/

FHE becomes a lot more interesting when you can hide the structure of your computation behind a VM.
When I onboard a new designer, I usually talk with them about Craig's List, Amazon versus "beautiful" UI. The point is exactly the last line of this article:

"Focus on content and functionality when you’re designing new products; that’s the validation that will build a business."

Now I'm going to add this article to required reading for new engineering team members.
Headers (in new code) will hopefully become optional due to modules. That would be such a big boost to the language.

C Macros are pretty much considered code smell in C++, right?
I think that's called translinear translation. I like the idea, but hard to find the content. I never thought to look for film though. I wonder if there is a site where you can download movie subtitles.
Grammar is many things packed in one. For one, it can signal a bunch of things, like maturity, superficiality, seriousness, intelligence. The lack of tolerance, like in you're example, is likely just someone who wants to vent, not a genuine concern for grammar.

The other thing is that writing on the open internet means that potentially many people will read the writing. Good grammar is borne out of routine, but this only works if the people practice the right thing - if they practice the wrong thing, then next time they'll potentially do the wrong thing by habit. So really, good grammar depends on reading texts with good grammar. It's also how we pick up vocabulary. Putting these things together, I think people owe it to each other, and the collective humanity, that they produce quality writings on public places.
Why IT? I can't help but wonder what she is trying to accomplish. If she wants career security, might I be impertinent and make a recommendation? From my experience, I think people severely need and are lacking child care resources. Does she have business acumen, or can she develop it, to the point that she can start a well-run daycare? I am not sure about the practicalities of starting a business like this, so I am mainly speaking from a "missing jobs/work needed" perspective.

Edit: the caveat being that she really should do the research in her area and make sure she has some competitive edge.
is this a serious question ?
:-)
There will be better physical, chemical, environmental, cost, and overall economic advantages resulting from efforts at source reduction than air capture.

This will always be what matters when resources need to be deployed most efficiently for abatement.

When you do the math, unless resources become unlimited, source capture is the better use of limited infrastructure.

It's really kinda-sorta completely impossible to fool Mother Nature on things like this.

The problem is not enough effort is going into source removal since the responsible source would be the only one that would be facing the added cost above what they are doing now.

With remote air capture the much less efficient and costly process can be spread among huge numbers of different but smaller payers whether they know it or not.

If that makes significant progress occur sooner that should make DAC be good to go forward with in the short term, but eventually people will be able to do the math at scale and most will say WTF were we spinning our wheels so long for?
You'll need to have spare fuses to burn or something. All memory is volatile if you're motivated enough.
Right up there I'd put:

Don't force people to use E-mail addresses as user IDs. It's a terrible idea for security and it's just straight-up dumb. Talk about amateur hour.
Additionally, by the time you're an undergraduate you should be able to play any scale and arpeggio smoothly without hesitation. I'm an idiot and played for about 8 years and really, scales and arpeggios are not that difficult. For someone who aspires for a teaching degree these should be cake and you should not be getting flustered by these at all.

Programming equivalent would be something like needing to write a syntactically correct for loop in a random language pulled out of a hat. A basic exercise with some challenge but simple to do if you have put any practice in it.
I just want the option of using my domain name as a verified handle everywhere. I’m so tired of having to participate in the gold rush to grab my handle for brand protection, especially on platforms I barely use.
Secure Boot keys are unrelated to the leaked key in question. The Boot Guard key is used to verify the firmware itself that the CPU executes on boot. What the firmware happens to do afterwards, say it's a UEFI firmware that implements Secure Boot, is irrelevant to Boot Guard.
I think introducing defp, with similar semantics to Elixir -- i.e. with overloading -- would actually be quite beneficial, while still feeling like Ruby.

For example, with overloading,

defp for_environment(Environment => environment)
case
when environment.isolated?
where(environment:)
when environment.shared?
where(environment: [nil, *environment])
else
none
end
end

defp for_environment(nil)
where(environment: nil)
end

defp for_environment(String => code unless code in UUID_RE)
none # no support for filtering via environment codes
end

defp for_environment(UUID_RE => id)
return none unless environment = Environment.find_by(id:)

# calls the pattern matched method for Environment
for_environment(environment)
end

Which would be equivalent to (using syntax from OP),

defp for_environment
in String => code unless code in UUID_RE
none # no support for filtering via environment codes
in UUID_RE => id
return none unless environment = Environment.find_by(id:)

case
when environment.nil?
where(environment: nil)
when environment.isolated?
where(environment:)
when environment.shared?
where(environment: [nil, *environment])
else
none
end
in Environment => environment
case
when environment.isolated?
where(environment:)
when environment.shared?
where(environment: [nil, *environment])
else
none
end
in nil
where(environment: nil)
end

Which would be equivalent to,

def for_environment(environment)
environment =
case environment
in String => code unless code in UUID_RE
return none # no support for filtering via environment codes
in UUID_RE => id
return none unless env = Environment.find_by(id:)

env
in Environment => env
env
in nil
nil
end

case
when environment.nil?
where(environment: nil)
when environment.isolated?
where(environment:)
when environment.shared?
where(environment: [nil, *environment])
else
none
end
end

In this case, I feel like defp with overloading could really clean up the code (defp without overloading, not so much). You no longer have to add the input transformation to your mental stack when groking the method.

I also don't really see a problem with allowing &block like a normal def.
Does that mean I can update my eol'd Chromebook Pixel with a current Linux distribution w/o disassembling it?
Right, and they're free to do so, just don't try to justify it by saying it's "correct". I'm not saying we should write poorly, or deliberately sloppily, just it's at the author or editor's preference.

I'd support this guy if he said "I hate 'comprised of' and so I am changing it where I can", but the idea that there's somehow a logical argument justifying it is silly. Appeal to authority is particularly silly in the context of linguistics.

If you like MLA style, do that. I personally love a little extra diaeresis and the oxford comma, but I wouldn't make them the law.
As others have pointed out, the title of the article is "As more electric vehicles hit the road, our charging habits must change - here’s why"
I think you mean that it cares about usage, not rules.
Nah, solutions are already built and operating: https://youtu.be/FoN4WCpuxHY

Pretty easy to stick a big battery in between grid and cars and balance the load.

Not to mention you can’t top up your gas car at home everyday like you can an EV.

EV charging will end up far more distributed than gas car filling.

I actually worked in a gas station for quite a while. Demand is never constant 24 hours a day. There are always peaks and troughs as the daily cycle of life revolves. EV charging will be just fine.
You're right. 100%.

There are areas that promote walking and other forms of transit and there are those that don't.

I am in a city that contains a voter base that is 80%(NDP - A Canadian political party that is left of the Trudeau Liberals). We have bike paths all over and many areas of the city can be reached through a gorgeous city wide bike path paved throughout gorgeous scenery. Together with dedicated bike lanes with spacers from traffic. Those paths are used mostly for excerise and the paths on the road are used by an alarmingly small sum of people.

Its definitely laziness for some people but not all.

I also read every privacy policy for services I use. I'm weird. I'm also lazy.
Artificial Intelligence has many meanings, but I've never seen it used to classify devices with timed explosions based on simple criteria.
The numbers were nice for that because they'd get out of the way when not needed, unlike if they were embedded in your username.

Sometimes you want to just be Susie around your friends, rather than having to think of a clever/unique variant.

And I'm saying that as someone with a very early account who actually stands a very good chance under this system of just grabbing my moderately common first name as the screen name.
Yep. We've had AI for years - it's just slow, and uses human brains as part of its computing substrate.

Or, to look at it from another angle, modern corporations are awfully similar to H.P. Lovecraft's Great Old Ones.