skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The CPU has 18 cores according to the link. So probably 9 or 18 x64 things. Wouldn't like to guess how an Intel GPU unit (EU?) compares to a SM or CU from the other two.

edit: misc stuff online suggests EU corresponds to a simd. It's sufficiently annoying to find an approximate ratio between that and the main two GPU arch that I'm giving up. Anyone know if 128 is a lot or trivial in this context? My outdated laptop has 8CUs and the better workstation cards are order of 100.
I'm not really a fan of the solution (something more along the lines of the v-chip where commercial sites in the US are required to identify their content categories in a standard way so browsers could be configured to block it seems like a better solution), and sites like pornhub are straightforward enough to include in blocking software, but currently sites like Reddit present a problem. Looking at recent dumps[0], it looks like ~40% of posts on Reddit are marked nsfw, but those posts are on the same domain as things like /r/teenagers and /r/roblox. Without a MITM proxy, parents can't really block the porn half of the site unless they block the whole thing.

[0] https://files.pushshift.io/reddit/submissions/
After seeing the QAnon folks, I think you'll just see in-fighting about what the "truth" is, when in reality, both sides are full of shite but for different reasons.
This would be a lot less problematic if we in the US wouldn't constantly use an ID as a authentication secret. Usage of social security numbers as a auth secret needs to be treated as a national emergency. Won't happen though because most our Congress people are geriatric and don't understand technology and the industry would push back on any change because it would cost then money.
I wonder if the workaround you mentioned in your second paragraph is bait Microsoft left for Google PMs?
Why do we need a policy? Why aren't parents doing basic things like setting up content filters?
Those other ones can't use GCS though, which is why I pointed to JuiceFS (at least the ones I recognize).
Reminds me of this bug in OpenBSD: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=124425026630958&w=2

Of course the reply was just a deflection, even though OpenBSD was the only buggy one.
> many people don't develop resistance, or at least not for a loooong time

Yes, but I have also seen people who used biologics for 10 years without issue, and out of the blue they started to have severe side effects that made them move drop off (or move to another one). You just never know.
> How are you hiding the fact that you have a transmitter uniquely signing and encrypting a unique certificate (sim) along with your serial of device (IMEI)?

The page doesn't want to load for me right now, but that may or may not be a problem depending on their threat model. If none of the things you're connecting to can see anything but a tor connection, and the cell network can see exactly where you are and who you are but not what you're talking to, how much of a problem is that?

> And there's the whole cell baseband has root to your phone issue.

So use one of the modems that just connects to the main processor over USB. I see this repeated a lot, but this particular problem is entirely solvable.
Agreed. Scrolling past pre-coffee I didn’t look too closely at the the details, and only on second glance did I spot the (in hindsight) obvious flaws.

This is like how I could smuggle two “the”s into the previous paragraph without most people noticing; we skim more often than we realize.
Could be just high value celebrity targets to ensure a small surface area with the highest value.
What about the tinfoil hatters that believe everything just because it's on some 2h YT video?
This is why I said "in a truly free market" in my explanation. Telecom is far from a truly free market. No matter how much capital you have, you cannot enter the market as a new provider, without regulators approving a huge variety of things, not just wavelength and radio stuff but also the right to exist at all as a provider of such telecom services. This introduces all manner of possibilities for corruption, lobbying, etc. that lead to monopolies.

IMO the main cause of monopolistic behavior is government regulation rather than natural tendencies of the free market (but that's up for debate and my position is unpopular).
38 GPU cores. The neural network inference cores don't do floating point and therefore aren't used for training or games. Assuming these GPU cores are comparable, if >3x isn't a reasonable target, what would you suggest is?
Thanks, Warrenm, for your comments and questions. In the past have used far too many languages to list. What I'm currently using is mostly .Net/C#, but as explained, I grow weary of the constant tweaking, the constant confusing releases and naming conventions, etc. Yes, I will stay in webdev, and location matters not, as I work for myself and have managed to service clients all over the world, often without ever even meeting face to face. My clients range in size from single employee startups to over a dozen multinational corporations.

By "fast/efficient" I was mainly speaking about speed of execution, although speed of development/maintenance is always important. Fast/efficient means (generally, and in my case) be able to handle thousands to tens of thousands of simultaneous users on a single web server. Which I currently can handily do with no problem.

By saying "scale well" I realize that I am addressing a different skill set and cracking open a completely separate set of topics, but in general I was targeting the frameworks with that phrase. If a framework already has features baked-in for horizontal scaling then that would be a plus.

In my experience, Windows servers are always more expensive and often require a bit more horsepower (CPU and RAM) to get similar performance. Not only that, but (again - in my experience) I must then add additional solutions that generally cost more in a Windows server environment (WAF, firewall, monitoring, etc.), and which can often be had "for free" or low cost with a Linux solution.

As for your comment about "basically any language/framework will check this box," I would respectfully disagree. Although I am far from feeble-minded, I am - as mentioned - older. And even though I feel that I am as sharp as ever, growing older brings a certain resistance to change. It's not that I CAN'T learn new things, it's that I DON'T WANT to spend a lot of time and frustration making the change. If you are saying that all languages and dev environments have a similar learning curve (which I doubt you were saying) then I would have to disagree based on real-world experience. Learning APL and Lisp were very different from learning Databus and COBOL and Pascal. Learning C++ is very different from learning Cold Fusion. Etc.

But your points are well taken. Perhaps my questions are simply too broad. I was just hoping to open a discussion about tools and frameworks that people have found to be fast-executing, relatively easy to pick up, and which might bring a certain amount of joy back to web programming and getting things done, rather than being mired in minutiae. As an example, I've just seen a recent post here on Sveltekit/Svelte, which I am now researching. As another example, I've frequently heard people attribute a certain amount of happiness or joy to using Ruby/Rails.

That sounds nice.
Ask HN: Do all headless CMSs just suck at localization?
My experience with headless CMSs hasn't been good so far. Two main pain points are localization and relations

It seems all alarm bells go off the minute you attempt to manage multiple locales.

See for example Strapi's localization, which has been broken for years with no fix in sight (due to how its designed) [See: https://github.com/strapi/strapi/issues/12538]

I feel like one of the core values of any CMS should be excellent UX but that seems far from the truth for headless CMSs.

I've also tried others like Directus but Strapi seemed the most mature of the bunch
Looking at the comments, it's clear other people read a completely different article than I did. I recently canceled my LinkedIn account as LI refused to allow me to upload images when using Firefox. I have no desire to live in the MSFT-centric world of the 90s they seem to be re-creating.
> Otherwise it's doing the students a disservice as they'll never use the language again and will have to relearn a whole new syntax later on.

They will have to to learn many new syntax in their career so that is a good start.

I never understood some people acting as if syntax were a big hurdle. Do people really need more than a few hours to learn a new syntax? From APL to C to Haskell to Lisp, I can't ever remember struggling with the syntax of a language.

> It's also far better to learn in a widely used language because there will be a wide variety of resources that can help you solve simple problems (and this is even more true in the era of ChatGPT).

This can be a pro and a con. While students should learn how to use publicly available information form search engines, stack overflow and so on, it can also be valuable to teach them ways of not having to rely on them. Learning to read proper technical documentation and working you way through a problem without had-holding is a great skill.

That said, shere is an good argument for using a "real-world" languages for teaching though: Studends will be be more motivated to learn them. Getting them interested in a "toy" language is just a hard sell. Motivation is what determines learning success more than having a technically perfect learning path.
No, these systems do not and cannot exist today. There is no such thing as computer security[1]. We may get there some day, decades from now. But today, if your data is on a networked computer, it should be treated as public.

[1] Every day there is a new headline proving this. Here is today's: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/05/t-mob...
But it makes sense contextually for users to set defaults from within the app they're using, that's when they're thinking about it. It's more intuitive UX.

The best solution is a system permissions dialog to confirm the change, so an app can't change anything silently.

Because using a control panel for all handlers isn't a particularly user-friendly experience, scrolling through 60 file types to hunt down the one you're looking for and then locate the appropriate .exe file. I mean the panel should exist but for power users.
The version number matches the latest version of Racket.
It's simply the tool used to generate the book site that inserts the version number. It's more relevant in the Racket docs than in the book though.
Yes, the Bitbucket PR screen is really good. Even when a commit removes the code a comment is tied to, it still shows it as an "outdated comment" or some verbiage like that. The approval controls available are pretty good too. But we've loosened up on the use of these a bit, as we're a really small group and the overhead was not worth the control for known and trusted actors.
In Colorado, I know a ton of people who grow their own. You just have to have a lockable enclosure, but most people don't bother and don't get any heat for it anyway.
I imagine inconsequential compared to societal costs of refined sugar, saturated fats, and alcohol.
Million, with an M? Might as well be a jaywalking ticket.
I you want to send email from your server, you're entirely dependent on how the other servers run by the recipients view you. So if you have a bad IP address, they might not let your email through. The procedure for establishing yourself as a legitimate sender of email and not spam varies, and would need to be resolved with the operators of every server you might ever want to send mail to.

So you're running your mailing list which people have triple opted into, with confirmations and everything. Someone marks your email as spam and now everyone with a google address is bouncing. You contact google to resolve this and get a canned reply saying they've reviewed it, it's correct, and they will take no further action, and won't discuss it further. Good luck.
Ecstasy. It's a party drug that's extremely popular in the rave scene.
Large draw appliances usually get put on a double pole breaker and a house will have many circuits.
They should rethink their marketing ;)
ChatGPT does use input as training.

The OpenAI API has a policy to not use input as training data.

Azure also offers the API with an agreement not to use it for training.
It still works fine for me including archiving. So either it's very resilient or there is maintenance happening.
A much better solution than was suggested by PornHub:

> PornHub said that a better solution is to identify users by their device.

Fingerprinting is not and should not be the sanctioned way of identifying people. On the engineering side, it is a horrible hack. On the ethical side, it is much worse to (attempt to) fingerprint since it tells PornHub waaay more than just age.
They are talking about this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35787466

> I feel like in our society we're always beta testing everything before researching its effects, shouldn't we research the effects of internet pornography in kids before allowing them unlimited access to it?
When's the last time the US publicly executed a homosexual person or adulterer, with or without trial?
This kind of porn has been around for decades and very few people actually do that kind of stuff. Something that's published isn't automatically a role model.

And the ones that do are really and truly into it. Yes it happens, it's not my kind of thing either but I know some people that love it.

What helps more is real sex ed. Explaining what sex is about, how to respect a partner, about safety. Rather than really easily circumventable bans. I got good sex ed when I was young in the Netherlands and I turned out fine and very respectful to women just like my peers despite having access to porn. The problem are religious schools not wanting to do serious sex ed. So the kids only have porn to go by.
I don’t know the first thing about the US army, but several others have this figured out already. I’m Swedish and our tents have been round for … well I don’t know how long.
Debian Stable welcomes refugees:

https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-dvd/

(Or, for laptops with closed WiFi and no Ethernet, use this installer: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-in... )
Zattoo | Berlin | Full Time | ONSITE / HYBRID | Video Backend Software Engineer, DevOps Engineer

Zattoo: Back in 2005, we pioneered Europe’s first TV streaming service. Today, we’re the world’s first certified climate neutral TV streaming provider. 3 million users across three countries. Over 230 colleagues of 47 nationalities.

// Video Backend Software Engineer / C++ and Golang Engineer https://grnh.se/7296c252teu

Video Backend Team: Our team develops the software which drives our carrier-grade streaming platform, covering the full processing chain from content ingest, transcoding, storage and stream delivery. We work closely with the Playback team - our counterpart to bring streaming features into applications, and with the Ads Backend team - whose engineers focus on our solutions for server-side dynamic ad insertion.
Its also much, much more addictive. As the set of banned substances grows, their analogues change and spice may be a different substance than it was 5 years ago.

Drug policies are a perfect example of good intentions paving road to hell and then some more, if you look at ie Mexico. Not that Nixon had any good intentions there whatsoever, but he certainly sold it to the public as such.
How do you think Siri works? I have a hint to you: it does not scan your brain waves.
More correct and less inflammatory version: "Think of the US less like a single (European) country and more like a collection of countries (states) representing various different cultures, some of which have widely divergent or more conservative values."
But that's the same as MDMA?
Would be nice to see at least a few of the principles called out. What makes them outdated?

And coupling/complexity are a touch on the weasel word space for our domain. They can mean things, sure, but they are often used for the emotion attached more than anything else. Worse, as programs grow, they probably should be coupled heavily. Loser coupling is almost always more complex to maintain and of diminishing returns. Is why the tires on your car can't be used on another vehicle. We probably could engineer the "one true wheel", but it would be done at the expense of capability. Not in pursuit of it.
The modern data stack sucks
I never said that. I said that its unique in how wide its reach is. Yes, you can find porn on Google if you turn off SafeSearch. Yes there are other PornTube sites out there. But if you dig deep enough I bet you'd find that most of them are owned by MindGeek too. MindGeek has the lion's share of the market right now by far.
Source selection logic most often is completely in firmware and as most antenna firmware are closely kept binary blobs that the soc comes preinstalled with.

I would wager to say that, while possible to do, it is practically impossible for the average joe unless they own a Librem 5 which afaik is the only one with an open source antenna firmware.
Gitea is great. The recent update that made email notifications like GitHub's by allowing you to reply to Issues comments is beautiful.
There is no FOSS in GSM/CDMA world, these technologies are closed as hell and there is no open information about the sim-card computers. Almost any old GSM phone (at least Siemens and Nokia) can chose towers voluntary - but in too developed countries having too small size on the globus everything pre-3G is disabled.
These are just 0-days in the Tor Browser/Firefox, not Tor. While in practice Tor Browser cannot be decoupled from the network (it provides users with large enough crowd to blend into), it can be surrounded with additional security layers. If you're a high-value target worthy of wasting a 0-day on you, running Tor Browser on a general-purpose system might be a bad idea; there are distros like Whonix specifically tailored for secure communication - they are far less vulnerable to this kind of attack.
Legalizing something doesn't make it more popular?
Not in a class room setting.

For someone that stumbles upon HtDP and begins in the middle, there will be some confusion.
Where are all the other grifters riding other people's genius to the orbit and then back to Earth in one piece? If it's as simple as just (ab)using some engineers, why can't Bezos do it?

Whatever you say, there is something unique about Musk that nobody else has been able to replicate.
ummm. Don't think of the US this way? Think of it as a complex representative government that is federated and representing a highly diverse population, unlike Iran, which is not exactly pro-immigration.

Our government is at least partly reactive to our votes. Utah is very different from Colorado or California or Connecticut. So, no, nothing like rich Iran.
The market is definitely there for enterprise LLMs. Everyone is using GPT for work. I use it to provide stubs for memos and to brainstorm - but the real value comes from replace internal “tribal knowledge” with an AI who knows your org in and out.
Don't reward them for that. The only solution is to move to another OS, that's the only thing they will ultimately understand - no matter how inconvenient it might be.
A person has to be present for all of those things - at least, if you want them to stand up to even the most casual challenge in a court of law.

The Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution requires that to be the case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confrontation_Clause
With that reasoning you can also put witches in prison indefinitely for "harming your soul". Sounds like logic from ages past to me
I'm saying consumer preference favours more competitive companies...ignore your distaste at the connotations of the word "dominate" and focus on the discussion - coops would be more commonplace, larger, and more successful...which is what you want no? Personally I'm indifferent to coops and their successes, they're a valid business model, they shouldn't be mandated, their structure limits them.
Do you have any evidence?

Seems like a whole lot of people were deeply hurt by feet.
Humans obviously have the capability to remember so it is hard to imagine what it would be like if we could not. For artificial neural networks it depends on their architecture and use, to be able to get a sense of things changing over time you need the ability to process information from different times at the same time. Therefore the network itself needs some memory that feeds back internally or some outputs of the network must be fed back into the inputs externally or the inputs itself must be from different times.
From sounding out “XTC”, I’m assuming it means ecstasy.
You can remove windows in quite a few more clicks, but it's ultimately worth it. Though I wouldn't put it past Canonical to add ads to the default desktop at some point.
What Cheetahs, Armadillos and Whales Revealed About Human DNA
That part of the article, not you.
No single team is accountable for these metrics

That's the core of the problem: if a maintainable / observable / whatever-able system is a desired goal, some team needs to own it (especially in the organizational structure you've described).

There are likely already people doing this work in your organization, they're just having to juggle it along with their "on-topic" responsibilities. Find those folks and figure out how to either let them get back to their main job, or make the global concerns their main job.
It is Google allowing the user to set the default browser using its own interface, using the API Edge uses to allow the user to set the default browser using its own interface.

Microsoft loves to complain about applications doing things it doesn’t like, while its own applications are doing those exact same things. According to Microsoft the rule is that the rules just don’t apply to Microsoft Office and Microsoft Edge.

Microsoft likes to pretend they play fair. But when they can’t win by playing fair, the facade quickly drops.
I like this! Easy to use, fun, useful.

Nice work.
The sad thing is that there's not much in Git's data model[1] that makes it bad for storing large binary blobs. An alternative implementation of Git (the program), or even a future version of vanilla `git`, could handle them just fine without the lfs hack, which I agree is horrendous, by using a different on-disk format for them and/or making sparse clones easier, and thereby remain 100% compatible with every other Git repository.

[1] There are some tweaks I would make, like using a standard Merkle tree hash function instead of sha1("blob "+size+"\0"+data), and a text-based encoding for commit and tree objects, but those are bike shed paint. I created a Git-like system based on these ideas that uses URNs and RDF/XML to make going 'under the hood' with a text editor a bit more pleasant than the experience with Git is, which is important because Git's tooling is far superior: https://github.com/TOGoS/ContentCouch/
Thanks. That chart is informative.
> People don't (generally) want to stand next to a 13 year old while looking at what porn/sex toys to buy, but beyond that it's pretty much the same argument

That is not why people don't want kids in sex shops.
Also, I forgot about it's performance index too: https://forgeperf.org/
> the lower case “i” prefix which became culturally ascendant with the iMac

I think you mean iPhone or iPod. Pretty much everyone knew what an iPod was. Basically everyone in the world knows what an iPhone is.

Lots of people have never seen or heard of an iMac.

iMac sales are likely less than 2M per year. iPhone sales are about 200M per year...

The iMac is about as culturally significant as the Microsoft Surface...
Thank you, where did you find that page? I'm still looking.

The github at least is linked at the articles end and has this:

https://github.com/redcanaryco/mac-monitor/releases