skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As someone on the spectrum with ADHD who was incorrectly diagnosed with a mood disorder, I will push back on this. Structural stability as a treatment plan did more for me in my formative years than any meds or talk therapy could do. Did it take a village (i.e., my school, home, and family friends all pitching in)? Yes. Did it work? Yes.

Structural stability alone is not a viable treatment plan for persons suffering from mood or anxiety disorders. Further, being pushed pills such as lithium and random anti-depressants like the article suggests causes persons with ADHD to become void of any feeling. ADHD meds don't do that.

The article states that "There are two possible explanations of the fact that “adult ADHD” frequenly happens with mood and anxiety conditions in adults. Either the mood and anxiety conditions cause the poor concentration, which is our view, or the adult ADHD causes the mood and anxiety symptoms, which is view of those who prefer to diagnose adult ADHD. In the latter case, the claim would be that every time someone has adult ADHD, they get very depressed and anxious about having adult ADHD."

I would instead argue that for persons with ADHD, it is the rigid social constructs that one is trying to guess at and maneuver are the sources of depression and anxiety. Because executive dysfunction.

The more understanding an individual or community, the less anxiety I have. I don't fit in with whatever "norms" a hyper rigid in-group has defined (because facts and research), and for the most part I know it. And when I don't know it I'm reminded of it, for instance by people like this author.

This isn't to say misdiagnosis of ADHD is not happening, rather it is to say that there is more to the human condition than what the author claims to know.
That really is a big issue, for me, with Windows 11 and Edge.

The entire experience is cheapened.

MS Edge, for instance, actually has an excellent base UI. But the UX is destroyed by plastering horrible tabloid news and ads all over the first launch experience.

The engineers are MS are obviously very good at what they do. But it feels like the rest of the product and marketing departments get ahold of things and jam in trashware and ruin it.

Windows 11 is fine. It's fine. The graphical changes to the UI are in improvement to my eyes, and they are slowly adding back utility. Such as right-clicking on the task bar and being able to launch the activity monitor!

They even have tabbed explorer windows now!

Still, MS did such a bad job of launching W11 that my two gamer teenager kids and their friends have sworn off it for as long as they can!
I would have loved to have had something like this when I was living in New Zealand, which is notorious for slumlords and rentals which are literal health hazards. Every time someone has proposed something like this for New Zealand on the NZ subreddit there are questions around legality (although some of it might just be fear mongering). How does it work out in the US? Are you planning to take info for properties worldwide?
I feel for you, but I hate videos. In an ideal world, content creators would release both a video version and a text version of their content.
Alternatively (perhaps additionally), if you want to pin a false flag operation on someone they're probably your top choice.
Good thing you won’t have to. No one is talking about forcing you to rip out your gas fireplace. You simply won’t be able to replace it when it breaks down 30 years from now.
The article seems to be quite a bit disingenuous in mixing hip-hop (where samples and beats are supposed to get recycled and the focus is on the lyrics) with the rest of commercial music (which lives and dies by its melody). A rapper stealing a 5-second sample from a metal band is not the same as a ripped-off (whether legally or not) rock song.
I’d bet the reason is that very few people think strategically like that. Also how many hiring managers are really incentivized to improve the company interview process as a whole? Even very smart people rely on feelings like “this person seems likeable, confidant, knowledeagble etc” so if an interviewee fails at those things the it could be genuinely well intentioned honest advice from the interviewees’ perspective to get more polish in those areas. When faced with a real person trying their best it seems kind of mildly sociopathic to be like “no you fail and we won’t say why because that would dilute our hiring signal” (which does happen btw as I’ve received that treatment).

Or to look at it another way many people (like me) are naturally bad at putting their best foot forward even though they would be good employees so improving their ability to convey thay they would be a good employee is a win all around.
The danger here is that your additional terms might be ineffective. The problem is, if you distribute it to an individual or a non-profit organization under the terms of the AGPL, then that individual or non-profit organization has the right to redistribute the software to anyone, including for-profit organizations, under the terms of the AGPL. It says so in the very first sentence after the copyright notice!

So if you do not want to allow this, then you must use something other than the AGPL. (Or maybe you could do some funky patching of the AGPL's terms, but you'd have to be careful to only do so by reference, since its text is copyrighted by the FSF, who only permit distribution of verbatim copies.)

Also, you should probably avoid calling it "fully free & open source" as you did in your original comment, since you intend for it to be neither Free nor Open Source in the sense ordinarily meant by FOSS.
Nevermind contractor vs employee - if you aren't allowed to "push to change the parameters", you're not an employee you're a SLAVE.
This article feels all over the place and the only thing I find myself agreeing with is that satiety is highly individual and situation dependent. Their definition of satiety has all the same shortcomings as their strawmanning of CICO and is not useful.

My attempt: a food is satiating if it has a particularly marked tendency to reduce your desire to consume more food. Solid foods tend to be more satiating than liquid foods (yes dairy is an exception); high-protein foods tend to be more satiating than low-protein foods; high-fiber foods tend to be more satiating than low-fiber foods; the combination of two or more of sweet/salty/fat is particularly palatable (drives eating) and not satiating. They're not perfectly correlated but they're useful heuristics for prioritizing what things to try.

It's a phenomenological definition as opposed to a technical one and that is frustrating to many including me because we want to know why. But it gives a direct way to evaluate a food and I say that makes it more useful.
I also argued strongly against this proposal. To me the biggest problem with private members, as it was implemented, is that is takes classes from “syntactic sugar on top of prototype inheritance” to something very different than that. It makes the mental mode of the language a lot more complicated, and without a lot of benefit.

I never understood why TC39 was so intent on this “hard privacy” stance they took, as without it there were much better and more sensible compromises that could have been made. (Especially since JS is an interpreted language - if someone wants to work out what private variables are in your code, they can always just inspect the source.)
Ada has no community. It’s dead.
I've nearly built this site for years -- it's actually partially created in one of my project folders. Thanks for doing this!
IIRC, it was due to spectre/meltdown [0], where a rather obscure design flaw in Intel CPUs of the time made it possible to slowly read the kernel memory space from an arbitrary process.

Microsoft added software mitigations for it to Windows 10, but they came with a price of a ~20% slowdown.

By the time of Windows 11, Intel fixed the issue in the newer processors, so instead of supporting both old CPUs (with slowdown) and new CPUs, Microsoft just scrapped the mitigations altogether and limited Windows 11 to new CPUs only.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meltdown_(security_vulnerabili...
kudos to you!
We Should Be Having More Kids
Does this mean windows 10 will stop bugging me to update?
Do you know if there are startups that specialize in helping startups go through this ? I got one reference below that I am going to look into more. If your reference can be shared, pls do
Yes. Large banks are more diversified in their portfolios, perform better, are more resilient and easier to regulate and audit by the state.
"we use a variety of metric to determine"
Translation. Shit! shit! oh SHIT!
How to Trust a Machine
Which is why I still use a wood-burning stove to cook on and and heat during the winter.
Hmm... looked for it on melpa, but couldn't find it.
So you can experience multimedia files, legacy formats like VRML and flash and all that beautiful and weird and gleefully part of our good old web.
So over time we can trim this down as more C libraries are upgraded to Rust.
That’s why UBI is plain needed at this point. Same thing was happening in acedemics ages ago. I write an extensive paper about certain subject and then someone else makes huge loads of money from publishing books on that same subject with slighht twist just enough to evade copyright claim.
Why is this approach better than adding an extension with the same compression scheme to AIFF?
I learned gardening from my dad and he'se the pure opposite of an engineer.

What he does, he goes through the garden, does a bit here and a bit there. If he sees a plant he likes, he makes space for it, if he doesn't like something, he cut's it down. Occasionally he brings new plants (some from other peoples trash).. or tries new things. If it works, he does more of it, if it doesn't work, it's usually just in a small patch. He doesn't really do any planning.

This way.. over the years, he has a massive and healthy garden. Very diverse, lot's of insects, flowers, fruits, berries... He never uses pest control either.

The lesson, "Don't fight forces, use them".
Sites like these have been popping up everywhere through the years. Why not simply use Yelp or Google? What are the moderation and verification challenges? What about legal/defamation issues? How would one trust each review?
Any landlord will have utilities in his name at some point or another.
I imagined standing there calling you to open my door but it seems an interesting security feature. You could even have a second front door and trap people. When one leaves they have to close the living room door before opening the front door. Say someone walks you up to your door at gun point to rob you or they attempt to force their way in. You can just tell them you cant prevent the call to the police and that the door wont open, we will be trapped in the hallway, I have no control over it.
> If you stop watching videos, there will be no reason to make the videos.

I feel for you, but as someone who made online video content before monetization became a real thing - I'm not sure that's true. The issue is our culture forces people to focus on creating for money instead of creating for the simple pleasure itself.
Most lawmakers are lawyers. Meaning most of the time when they are writing laws in things, they are not th experts on such things. That the purpose of public comment periods, Publix hearings, and lobbyists being able to help craft laws.

Now, this seems to be a failure where there were not protests raised to this amendments or the lawmakers ignored such things. Either way, the point of lobbyists is to allow industry experts to provide input. If there is nothing wrong with their suggestions, I don't see a problem with verbatim including of their wording.

(I disagree with how the NY law was changed, but there are reasons lobbying exists).
They require someone to take time out of their busy schedule to build?

Complaining that people won’t work for you for free is a bit much, don’t you think?
I've lived in Oak Park, IL for over a decade, shopping for houses several times, and have never seen an electric stove. What's your point?

What's clearly the case is that homes in China do not generally have the ultra-powered gas wok burners that restaurants do, which is what people are talking about when they talk about what's distinctive about cooking on a wok.
Sure, and you can do both :)
I liked YouTube a lot better when 95% of the channels weren’t trying to make money.
I worked on a product about 25 or so years ago that is still sold, maintained and in active use - there will be bits of my code in there somewhere.
How would you approach thinking about this in a way which makes the lawyers culpable rather than an acceptable part of the status quo?
Is protein more satiating than carbs and fats?
Absolutely there are reasons to choose to do your rounding in a particular way for a particular purpose. I was only making the point that the argument for using fixed point decimal that is laid out in the post had nothing to do with the choice of decimal and nothing to do with the choice of fixed point.
It's pointless for a consumer OS unless most users support it. There will need to be a version that requires it sooner or later.
one could put a sign on the door with the number to call + qr code.
'parsimonious' is a pretty decent word here

we could try defining a new word for specifically this sense of 'simple'. for example, 'fivous', 'blorsy', 'bonatchy', 'jatomurous', or 'wislous'. the problem is that if the word gets adopted, it's likely to undergo the same sense shifts as its synonym 'simple'
Probably easier to answer your question if you can explain what you are trying to achieve.
Even in extreme cold environments, assuming your home is properly insulated, a 12 hour power outage means you might have to put on a sweater. Yes, multi-day outages are a problem but I think I’ve experienced two of them in my 50 years of life. Not worth worrying about.
That might be interesting usecase for banking applications feature. Another thing is profiling your behaviour based on your transactions history, terrible choice while optimising own processes without considering privacy. But why not!
i wasn't trying to defend the post
‘Why beethoven’ review: Can a genius survive?
Jeffrey Katzenberg
I mean, yes, the number of cultures is probably mathematically countable, but considering how quickly they split and merge and mix and such (and have been doing so for likely the entirety of human existence), do you really think it would be practical to do so? ;)
Yeah, I’m just not interested in 1 hour content with 10 minuite information density. I’m just not gonna watch 10 years long video even if it’s about how to bodyswap to Leonardo Dicaprio.
I worked for a while at a company that everyone hated, and there was an ongoing war on Glassdoor between the narcissistic CEO and the employees. Every new employee (and there were a lot of those because turnover was high) left negative reviews, and periodically the CEO would get on with a bunch of sockpuppet accounts and leave positive reviews. It was a small enough company that we knew they couldn't be real (they claimed roles that were all accounted for, and they'd all show up over a day or two with the same writing style), but Glassdoor has basically no verification and never responded to our reports. The only action their moderators ever took was to remove our reviews if we tried to call out the inauthentic ones.
That is kind of not how academia works. Prestige is everything. If you don’t attract the best students, you get less citations. Infrastructure crumbling? That means less grants, and therefore less citations.

The worst part is that tenured professors don’t really feel the brunt of being in a shrinking department, because they are never personally at risk. They do lose prestige, but the last few are at the stage of their careers that it doesn’t matter enough.

Honestly it feels a lot more like the fall of (Western) Rome to me. A lot of people who don’t remember what we did to get this great system, and are slowly chipping it away for their own benefit until it finally collapses. Ridiculous amounts of infighting while the humanities are burning down. Both the woke crowd and the Trumpers united on how resolutely they stand against academic freedom.
So I will move to a platform that's literally more restrictive in every other way (in)humanely possible? Right!
It is a lie, since Bitcoin Cash never moved funds that weren't signed by their owners. You're going to have to prove that, now, or admit you overspoke.

The direct counter-evidence against Craig's claimed key ownership are the facts that many of his claimed addresses signed that he was a fraud, that Wizsec showed that the 1feex address was actually stolen MtGox funds (and nothing to with Craig at all,) the court records of Klein v. Wright showing he completely made up the list of claimed addresses by instructing Shadders (a shoddy programmer from nChain) to construct the list entirely algorithmically from broken precepts.

So no, it wasn't just "one" key. It was dozens.

(Lots of addresses that Craig claimed were his, signing that Wright is a fraud):
https://craigwright.lol/

(An outline of why the 1feex are entirely NOT Wright's Bitcoins):
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoi...
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2020/06/mtgox-march-2011-theft.html

(An ultra-early miner, maybe the second miner, signing his own early blocks proving they aren't Craig's, either):
https://twitter.com/druidian/status/1447833107143483393

You are doing a slippery thing here by claiming that your directly-falsifiable statement about Bitcoin Cash being a "precedent" where "developers control the funds"—while now in the above statement claiming that this was actually in regards to Satoshi likely not stepping up to defend his own key ownership—is somehow related.

You clearly don't know what you're talking about, or else you could show me even a single instance where Bitcoin Cash moved funds absent its owner's key signature—which is entirely what this entire thing is about, namely a court case where Wright is suing to attempt to force a backdoor into Bitcoin which would move funds specifically to his possession without a key owner's signature (or a coinbase pay.)

Finally: reasons why you don't have any idea what you're talking about, itemized:

1) You didn't know that Bitcoin Cash never moved funds without a coinbase payout or a key owner's signature but asserted it did.

2) You didn't know about the direct evidence of Craig's claimed keys being owned by other people.

3) You don't know how hard forks work because you think that hard forks can happen gradually and that pressure from minor buy-in can push it to adoption.

Aside from the DAO (which is irrelevant because Ethereum is a scam) you haven't had a very good batting average in general, and for Bitcoin, it's atrocious.
LoveFrom, Serif: a modern interpretation of Baskerville
Like mentioned before, get any IP camera and make sure it has ONVIF. On software side, ZoneMinder is a popular OSS NVR/DVR for Linux. That way, all the recording remains on my self-hosted solution or on my home server and not to a 3rd party cloud service. I bought my cheap security camera from Amazon with ONVIF and they've been better than expected.
Oh yes! Firmly seconded, I've been a subscriber in the past.
You’re Using ChatGPT Wrong Here’s How to Be Ahead of 99% of ChatGPT Users
The key reason is that an extra second of time spent hovering or close it is another second of resisting gravity, which takes fuel, so the most efficient hypothetical ‘burn’ is one big bang ‘hoverslam’ right at the end and 0 seconds spent fighting gravity

The SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket does have throttle control, but at minimum thrust the thrust-to-weight ratio is still greater than 1, which means they have to hit 0m/s at exactly 0 feet of altitude or they start going up again. I’d imagine they time their ‘hoverslam’ to take 2x minimum thrust (or some other multiplier) and then adjust up or down through the manoeuvre.
Do you speak from experience?

Honestly, I find the whole mainframe world fascinating. Would love to learn more.
As in, "I got [dgipt]." or "That model is quite the [dgiptster]."? (i.e., 'gyp' https://www.dictionary.com/browse/gyp)

Or is it more "I got [gee pee teed]." / "That model is quite the [gee pee tee-ster]."? (i.e., 'A(G)I that does unexpected things for which astonishment is felt')
This is why some sort of blacklist feature should exist to ignore such critical cases that are not intended to be deleted (but then again this defeats the purpose of the methodology).
The big problem with Apollo is it's so good that it makes me spend way more time on reddit. I've installed and removed it many times. I happily paid for Ultra the day he started offering it because I appreciate the work that went into making it that smooth and useful.
There is a section of Apple users/fanbase that, if one day Cook instructs someone at Apple to run a remote command and wipe every single piece of data on their devices and nuke backups in iCloud as well, they will find a way to feel grateful about that and advocate and defend Apple in hordes even before Apple had the time to speak about it.

From the top of my mind it seems they would start with "I was struggling to get into the zen mode, disconnect, and seeing Apple failed to do with with ScreenTime their latest effort helped me perfectly. It just works!".
NextDoor mails a card with a confirmation code to your address
Nice work! Did you have to void-fill at all or did the latest SRTM data handle that?
Because the ad is delivered in one, and not in the other.

You're comparing two unlike things. The equivalent to leaving the room during TV ads would be leaving the room during YouTube ads (or changing windows/apps).
Why…
No Thanks. Can you tell me how GDPR has made EU life better than US? It's a hot mess. Criminals of EU can now easily hide from the internet, while the innocent click through hundreds of cookie popups
> You have a collection of N things, with some fixed number of features each (doesn't matter how many, but call it d_f). Call that collection {x_i}. You have two learnable matrices Q and K, which learn to project those items into some collection of "questions" and "answers", respectively. Doesn't really matter what those questions or answers are, the NN will figure out what they should be during training.
These projection matrices map x_i -> k_i, and x_i -> q_i. k and q are each d_k-dimensional vectors (d_k is a number you choose) of features, so Q and K are d_k-by-d_f matrices.

Wait: this is the plain English version? I’ve just been presented an alphabet soup of symbols, most of which haven’t been defined:

N, d, f, x, i, Q, K, and q and k (lowercase). The only one I’m sure I understand is N.

The different letters seem to be drawn from certain regions of the alphabet, so I guess that’s significant in some way?

(I do understand vector, matrix, softmax, dimensionality, etc.)

I’m embarrassed to admit this here, but I run into this issue almost any time concepts are explained in math, including in the textbooks that teach math. What am I missing?
Knuth has a great few pages on Fibonacci Hashing TAOCP Vol3 pp 510 - 512
This is an absolutely fantastic app. No subscription bullshit or anything—does what it's supposed to, which is a lot. I think my favorite feature is the ability to include custom CSS for sites; really helps to hide adblock whine screens and other garbage.

(I'm not affiliated with either the app or the devs, I just hate bad websites and find this really useful for mitigating the issues.)
Why can’t you use it for personal use?

I doubt the Facebook Police are going to bust down your door at 3am.

…or are they? peeks through curtains
And they hijack the back button on iOS