skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"A little while" as in how long?

Re: the sibling comment, I had to switch the Chrome to see the button, but I don't know how patient I need to be, or what the interface is supposed to look like once it's ready.

Edit: ok, took a couple of minutes. That is way more awesome than the initial demo. The map even includes the ready room and conference room of the Enterprise D.
Perhaps, a counterpoint, the popularity of patronizing comments on HN make it... well, easy to discount what is actually quite good advice. Reconsider?
This doesn’t work. The very failures we are seeing today are why this doesn’t work.

Why would someone leave their money in the regional bank offering 0.3% that all of their issued loans average barely above when people can take it to a bank offering 3% or get CDs offering that?

Community scale banks aren’t a solution for this.
It gets worse. The human answers were scraped from Reddit replies by verified doctors on r/AskDocs.

It's an unfair test. Doctors don't normally provide care directly to patients based on a few paragraph written description of your situation, and GPT was trained on Reddit.

I don't have access to the paper so I can't tell if they ensured their human answers are from before the GPT cutoff.
I didn't believe it was the case: i was asking because I didn't know. (And, thanks for the link. interesting stuff.)
If your vote is the deciding vote (i.e. the candidate won by exactly 1 vote), please buy me a lottery ticket.
lol not sure why you're being downvoted.

I'll point out this is nothing new. Heroku being another (maybe dated) example.

Fly.io isn't perfect but I have to hand it to them, atleast they self-host and work to differentiate their stack.
Yes, yes, inflation changes things (a little) but the glaring result is, these bank failures are massive, significant and unprecedented.

We can find historical failures of adjacent institutions but clearly something new is happening?
In the discussion above I'm referring to folks saying that FF "bogs down" or becomes unresponsive in real world usage, something I've never experienced.

But benchmarks are fun too...

this is quantified not only by some arbitrary
number but also through the visibly slower
update speed during the DOM tests.

I ran that and Chrome was 50% faster than FF on my 2018 MBP. Safari was even faster than Chrome by a few %. I would also agree that there was a visible difference in those benchmarks.

My opinion is that while benchmarks are vital, I don't believe that a benchmark such as that necessarily correlates with user experience. There are benchmarks where FF is faster and certainly they can't all be right. (At first glance, the one you linked appears to be a mix of modern UI frameworks, which seems pretty reasonable to me)

A look at a browser's dev tools during my "normal" usage certainly aligns with what I'm saying -- network bandwidth/latency really dominates perceived performance in nearly every use case; blasting out DOM updates as fast as possible via a synthetic benchmark does not resemble my browsing sessions.

That is of course just my subjective opinion. You may have other use cases in which your browser is truly the bottleneck. Or you can just have another set of preferences.
Yeah, without delving into them too deeply, the name alone suggests a common ideological approach to economic policy.

...oh, Reagan, Thatcher and Hayek are honorary fellows, and Condoleeza Rice is the director, and the Walton family make generous endowments.

I'm unsurprised. Economics becomes ever more dismal when it becomes political. And I feel a strong urge to link to the Supply Side Jesus comic, but to be fair that happens whenever Reagan and Thatcher surface.
Oh absolutely. My point was just that if you truly wanted to make a big risky bet, you would definitely not be going out and buying a bunch of agency bonds.
> Yes I’m aware of the insurance guarantee but I’m not aware that the FDIC has some self-imposed rule preventing them from doing more.

The “least-cost rule” is not a self-imposed FDIC rule, its a rule Congress imposed in 1991 after bank failures in the 1980s were felt to have been managed to expensively when the FDIC used funds to allow banks to stay open or otherwise protected uninsured depositors and creditors.

> and given they could just “throw it out” as they see fit.

They can’t. There is an exception available to the least cost rule, but that exception – the systemic risk exception – cannot be invoked by the FDIC, it can be invoked only by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the President, and with the support of 2/3 of the FDIC Board of Directors and 2/3 of the Federal Reserve Board.
I know nothing of the sort.

I think someone found an interesting dataset, tried to visualize it, and thought it looked interesting. I doubt that there was any motive to the dataset other than, "Here's what I get from the FDIC, what does it look like?" Then shared code and source so that anyone else could reproduce it.

If you can find another data source that gives a fuller picture, you should. But compiling these data sources takes work. And the ones you get are all going to be a particular slice that represents some things but not others.

I did not personally find it misleading.
Okay I understand the point you are trying to make (your concern is more about reserves). I'll differ with you slightly here: US dollar reserves are highest purely because we use USD for imports from other countries too. That is why it is the most sought after today. We are all selling to US consumers primarily because we want those dollars to trade with other countries as all trade happens through SWIFT. However, with de-dollarization, we are trading with each other in our own currencies. Now obviously that would mean we wouldn't be storing more than what is minimally required in USD reserves as we would be holding a bigger basket of currencies instead.

Would USD reserves still exist? Yes. Would the volume of those reserves remain intact? Absolutely not. It will reduce significantly as it gets replaced by reserve currencies of the countries we have direct bilateral trade with. Is that going to reset the USD price in the market? Obviously yes. Water finds its level. So will USD. Would USD still be the most sought after? Depends on the US consumer. If the US consumer still has an appetite for goods/services it will be the most sought after.

You see, until now, all non-US countries were forced to be in the SWIFT system because we had no other way to trade. Now that we do, the reliance on USD as a reserve currency falls. USD will find its level eventually.

Also, do not forget demographics. US is losing the demographic race. The "young population" is shrinking rapidly and they are the "consumers" in any consumption economy. Like Elon Musk said recently, demographics is destiny. And US is losing that race and is not realizing it. Consumption will slow down majorly in the coming decades and other countries have to think of alternative solutions. Because consumption will move to where the "young population" is. And demographics decides that.
I assume it often starts with "kill those people" and once that nasty business is out of the way and new people are selected to replace them there's a very strongly implied "Now you people make a better life for the rest of us, or else we will go back to the 'kill those people' step and repeat as needed."
Youve apparently never listened to grimes
Great idea. I'll do two website sections: daily and weekly. Weekly section will have it's own newsletter with, say, only news with score over 7.0.
I don't believe you. I think you're either lying, or misunderstood what your external counsel told you. If you want us to take your claim seriously then post copies of their opinion letters.
What do you mean by "doesn't even allow a choice?" Like there's no option for non-secure?

Also I would not be too hasty to expect the death of any widely used protocol. You can still access gopher sites.
I hope this doesn't bring the terrible python dependency story
All votes are the deciding vote, in that case!
ReplitLM specialized on code completion open-sourced by Replit
Good riddance!

That the web's core transport protocol used to lack encryption and authentication is an artifact from a time when nobody thought that the Internet was ever going to be used for anything of real-world value.

HTTP is a dinosaur. The age of the dinosaurs is over. It's slightly cool and quirky that it used to be a thing, but we should all be glad that it isn't anymore.
So you claim 20% of US families, or about 25 million use your service.

Your website is showing me "502 Bad Gateway" right now.
Sure, I'm just pedantic :) Re: the risk of interest rate backed securities "I too like to live dangerously" as they say.
They may have believed that, but that’s not the basis for invoking the systemic risk exception which allowed covering of uninsured deposits.
NeverSSL is the way to go - they have a number of cache-busting tricks that I haven't seen on other sites.
There was something insanely appealing about the REX and related devices. I would love to see someone build a PDA or Tamagotchi-like Expansion Card or Input Module for a Framework Laptop.
That’s correct.

The port powers up in the default low power mode, but the attached device can signal that it supports more if the device can provide it.

You want to start off with low power — since starting off with high power could damage devices that don’t support it.
> And while we haven't quite reached that pinnacle of absurdity, it did hit 37,000 not so long ago.

Why do you think this is absurd? You know inflation means we’ll get there even without ridiculous multiples, right?
>These Terms of Use apply when you use the services of OpenAI, L.L.C. or our affiliates, including our application programming interface, software, tools, developer services, data, documentation, and websites (“Services”).

Though, they don't define "developing and improving".
Set up fail2ban then good luck to anyone to anyone trying your address, it's very simple. Ensuring upgrades and security patches is literally running sudo apt update and sudo apt upgrade. Should be a piece of cake for anyone who has been running Linux for a few years.
This was very smooth in my iPhone. Strangely satisfyingly smooth.
There are so many topics where it just makes stuff up. I asked it about an API today and it didn't know, so just dumped random SQL queries. I tell it that it is not SQL and it just does it in Python instead. Supposed to be JS/JSON.
The main disseminator of hacking news from Brazil to the world
Don't know about chrome, because it's an application and not itself harmful, but yes they think Google docs will steal their data. Or any other cloud service. They are all banned for employees. I'm surprised that anyone is surprised by this.
Only if the police were actually interested in seeing the location of your stolen property & going there to look for it, which is not a typical experience when reporting a theft to an urban police department.
> The FDIC managed the entire thing, backed all the maneuvers with their 128bn fund, is independent and reports to the POTUS, and is entirely funded by deposit insurance fees on the financial industry. The FED had its own opinions on the whole situation I’m sure, and provided a short-term liquidity loan to the FDIC, but it’s a bit misleading IMHO they way their involvement is discussed.

So you are saying that the decision to invoke the systemic risk exception and cover all depositor funds despite the least cost rule was an independent decision of the FDIC and not, as the law requires, a decision made by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the President, backed by supermajorities of both the Fed board and the FDIC board?

Strange that that’s not what the joint Treasury/FDIC/Fed press release said.
The Wobblies are such a joke that there was talk about taking them over around 20 years ago by just getting enough people with your similar mindset to join.

Like the 4chan raiders before the 4chan raiders.

I forget the amount of people it would have taken but it was laughably low.
You can swear on HN, this isn't tiktoc.
Yes exactly. You plug in the cables and then there's the following conversation:

Laptop: *Om nom nom, 5 volts, yum!*

Power supply: Hey, I can do 5 V, 9 V, 15 V and 20 V

Laptop: I hear ya.
Laptop: Can I get 20 Volts?

Power supply: I hear ya.
Power supply: Here's 20 volts!

You get the idea.

All the way up to whatever the device will accept. Past that, the device rejects the offer from the power supply.

The original spec lists 5 V, 9 V, 15 V and 20 V, with support of for volts being kinda common because that's what cars use so the circuitry support already exists. According to spec, the charger is supposed to support all the voltages lower than it's max, but ofc not everything is spec compliant.

20 Volt @ 5 Amp is 100 watts which was the old maximum power usb-c PD could do. But it turns out that wasn't enough, so they renamed that to be Standard Power Range (SPR) and released when Extended Power Range (EPR). EPR adds adds 28 V, 36 V and 48 V @ 5 Amps, to the spec, for a new maximum of 240 Watts of power.

(Longer desc of the conversation in table 5 in https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva842/slva842.pdf )
OpenAI's ChatGPT may face a copyright quagmire after 'memorizing' these books
So they hate the same things as Peter Thiel
LinkedIn. My email is bombarded with spam and LinkedIn messaging isn't free or unlimited, so they tend to be a bit more focused.

Even on my private infrastructure emails, the email burden is quite high. LinkedIn has maybe 3 messages on a busy day.
Not educated on this, but whats the problem with it?
I've witnessed a large number of studios across the US and Latam using RX on a regular basis — places recording anything from indie stars to Grammy-winning artists.
I don't view LN as having anything to do with bitcoin because it all happened off chain. The benefit of the consensus protocol is lost entirely since consensus is only reached once LN transaction chains are sent back to the bitcoin network and eventually make it into the blockchain. LN transactions rely on am entirely different network of transactions, validators, and (de)centralization tactics.

What are the benefits you see in LN that are worth the tradeoffs of abandoning bicoin's main chain consensus protocol?
“Don’t feel bad […] but also do feel bad” sums up… a lot of engineering growth. Everyone makes mistakes, and we don’t want junior engineers beating themselves up about it. But if you don’t honor the reasons why they’re beating themselves up—eg pride in their work, caring about any time they cost others with an outage, etc—telling them not to worry looks a lot like an insult. The trick is to help them identify where that sense of responsibility stops being productive (e.g. by driving them to go read docs, or test that edge case in the future) and is just stressing them out (e.g. blaming themselves for a rocky release when the real problem is that deployments at your company are a 20-step process with poor visibility and no undo).
I get that the Post Office might be lazy. The contractor absolutely might be lazy. Even the prosecution I suppose. But the defense didn't demand any kind of proof?
Even then most VPS providers offer a load balancer and you can add multiple VPS. It's not so black and white on 1 server vs infinite scaling. There are midpoints.
I suspect one factor in early reddit growth was early promotion on and rapid adoption by many of the (original) freenode IRC crowd (and extended spouses, famil, etc).

I recall the days when it was a "proof of concept" single page lisp based site(?) that got taken on as the default place to post links for ranking and persistant comment (alongside other tool sites like pastebin for text content pastes etc.)

The early theoretic comp sci posts died off and cats took over, followed by subredits etc .. and here we are :-)
I'm not debating that one acre of urban land is worse for the environment than one acre of rural land, but that's not a realistic tradeoff. You need hundreds or thousands of times as much land to house people in a rural setting than in an urban setting.

Rural people don't pave over all of the land that they have, but they certainly pave over more of it than each person's share of paved over land in an urban setting.

If all the people in the entirety of Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, and the western half of Minnesota lived at the density of NYC, more than half a million square miles or more than 99.9% of the entire land area in those states would be completely untouched wilderness[1]. If you think that all human habitation in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, and the western half of Minnesota combined has a smaller impact on the environment than 469 square miles of NYC, then you are clearly delusional.

[1] https://www.slate.com/articles/life/culturebox/2014/10/popul...
I’ve got a lot of dumb little things living out on the internet deployed this way, and I don’t think I’ve ever been compromised. Maybe you were just especially unlucky?

There are some things I’ve deployed without much care and yet they’re always as I left them.

I’m not saying there’s nothing to worry about. I’m just not sure it’s all that difficult with some rudimentary (but sane) security practices.
Not anymore? (This discussion is pretty much a dupe.)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35789730
Demo: Code Completion with replit-code-v1-3B
Boobies are great, useful, and oftentimes beautiful. Yes, the US can be a bit puritanical but porn is hardly just boobies.

Premature exposure to sexual content is thought to be deleterious to a developing brain. Sure, kids mature at different rates but what should be formative years might instead be spent in navel gazing porn addiction which can lead to developing a taste for evermore strange, fringe, and or violent self gratification or acting out of fantasies and disrupted socialization. Instead of going out and figuring things out, why leave the house when you can get your fix(es) in the comfort of your own room.

Yeah, it’s a judgement call but one I’m comfortable with. Kids have always figured sex out just fine, we don’t need to throw nitroglycerin on already raging fire in the way of ever increasingly fringe/violent/illegal unlimited free sexual videos on demand. You can read up on Reddit about people addicted to porn and how empty of shells they feel like, childhood is the wrong time to introduce this fuel to that fire.

Don’t worry the porn owners can learn to code.
With HTTP/1.1 you can debug a request via an ASCII telnet session. Not feasible with QUIC.

HTTP/1.1 has a beautiful, elegant, simplistic essence; super easy to implement servers and clients from scratch with literally no dependencies beyond string formatting and basic TCP network APIs.
Stunning work! Just one small issue: changing the size of pages/canvas causes clicks. It may be caused by the absence of SharedArrayBuffer.

Solution:

--------------- ----------------
| main thread | <--- SharedArrayBuffer ---> | AudioWorklet |
--------------- ---load CPP WASM and postMsg ---> ----------------

I used to have that issue in my browser-based live coding env: https://glicol.org

But SAB makes it gone, except on old safari that does not support SAB...
>How is that amount still causing inflation?

I can't tell if this is a disingenuous question. Your $2200 is a very, very small amount of the total pie. Have a look at how the money supply changed during the pandemic. At the very start of the pandemic, when money was being printed there were experts saying "we will see inflation in the next 2 years", that's what we're seeing now.

Here's a Deloitte paper published in 2020 (see page 9: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/6...)

>According to Friedman’s view, the United States will experience very significant inflation in 2022
AI memorizing parts of a book may not be copyright infringement. But WHEN it outputs passages from the book verbatim that clearly is, right?

It's like if I memorize a song in my head that's fine. That is not copyright infringement even though in some sense I have copied that song into my brain.

But if I then write out and publish or sing the song in public, that is, copyright infringement, clearly. If I do it systematically to many songs and make money out of that, even more so.
GLHF = PG13 “FAAFO”
> the related to the nuclear power plant

"As of year 2016" (obsolete), and "according to media analysis" (vague source).

The official number of "Disaster-related deaths" is directly tied to a "disaster condolence fund system" (families have to apply). This is discussed in:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266676572...
What's interesting about this doomsday scenario is it suggests that a few web browsers dictate the course of the www, not several billion websites.

I'm betting that HTTP outlives me and goes beyond the time period I use the www. So far, so good. HTTP/1.1 pipeliing works better than ever. The www is faster than it's ever been and I can consume more web than ever before. I am generally unable to crash the web browser I use to read HTML. All the software I'm using is generally relatively small and solid.

This is only possible because I use TCP clients, TLS proxies and a text-only browser. If I were using a popular web browser I could not make the above statements. Heck, even the supposedly most advanced browser today will choke/become unreasonably sluggish if I try to open a large HTML file, say 20M or more. Whereas I do not hesitate to open/dump 20M HTML files using the text-only browser.

Anyway, I always thought CurveCP was more impressive than HTTP/2 or HTTP/3, which both came later. It did not take a mega-sized "tech" company to create it, only one focused person. No internet advertising needed. I would be willing to bet Mike whatever or whomever at Google used CurveCP for inspiration in creating HTTP/2 and 3. Google, with its trillions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of employees, still has not come up with its own encryption that is any better than what the CurveCP author originally came up with, which is now part of QUIC and myriad other software: https://ianix.com/pub/curve25519-deployment.html

It is what it is. History.

The localhost proxy I use is configured to send all HTTP requests via TLS so the GET request for http://http.rip was sent to https://http.rip, port 443. It appears to have worked. I guess someone forgot to disable HTTPS.
Sure, "Coffee is a drug" just as much as Caffeine and sugar are. OP likely meant that those who abuse scheduled drugs (outside of weed) are more likely to develop a habit of putting off work to feed that addiction, or to be fired for misconduct in connection with their use, resulting in more late payments and eventual repossessions/foreclosures on loans. It's all in terms of managing risk, but I'm sure chronic alcoholics are just as risky, if not more risky, as meth heads, since they blend in and have a good credit score but are more likely to lose their job for being intoxicated at work or go to jail for something like drunk driving.
The binary doesn't need to lug around a CPython binary. Mojo is a compiler that uses MLIR to compile standalone binaries.

(Unless you use `python.import`, which uses the CPython interpreter.)