skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Right now, Microsoft is perm-banning accounts from all servers for gameplay activity that is openly encouraged on certain servers, like griefing, which is a fundamental aspect of anarchy servers like 2b2t; to say nothing of the speech policing.
“Cool” implies a specific kind of social status among specific groups. Hence my question whether the folks at the NYT are teenagers.
I touched an AAA, Amiga3000 prototype Dave Haynie had, in an elevator.
The best way is to change the password in the environments, and let it in the commit history. It's both the easiest and the correct way.

And if you can't, your company have to change its architecture.
The point of lobbyists is to have someone talk to the elected representatives to let them know what their job is. It would be kind of silly to go to all of the trouble of electing a representative and then never talk to them again. They most certainly are not mind readers.

Same reason you talk to your representative on the regular so that your position is known. It's why you hired someone to represent you, after all. As before, the person you hired is not a mind reader. You have to talk to him. Like any employer, if you don't keep in regular touch with your employees they are not going to do the job you expect of them.
Except that arr[...] - value may overflow, and is UB in C.

Even removing the UB with something like __builtin_sub_overflow(), if arr[...] is INT_MAX and value is -2, then the difference will have the high bit set!

I haven't tried it, but this should compile to a cmove or seta, not a jump:

int cond = arr[step+begin] < value;
begin += step & -cond;
Obviously. But it shuts it down when you remove it instead of just working again when reapplied. It turns off the cooking surface and you have to turn it back on again, instead of momentarily breaking the heat while you pick it up.
I never owned an amiga until very recently, I owned an Atari back in the days, 30 years later now I understood one thing: Amiga/Commodore had the best engineers Atari had the best business folks.
"The algorithm" is a work of art and the owners of the algorithm, like other great artists, steal.
The end of an era: employers retake control
Furthermore, Ranger, not ECS, was supposed to be the successor of OCS, with much higher specs.

Ranger was even finished and ready to go, but CBM management decided against it. It would have shipped around 1988.

Management culture of overruling architects was one of many reasons CBM went to hell.
The problem is when you can externalize problems with impunity. Doesn't really matter what the basic system is. Generally you find that systems that strip individuals or disfavored groups from having any power at all do that a lot. Especially those where pushing back is dangerous.
> Is there some way to correct this? How do you reward good behaviour here, and discourage “misbehavior” like this?

…Yes? As the employer, find ways to be as generous and rewarding as possible. In immortal other words, “Fuck uou pay me.”

Every example provided was “I went above and beyond and was not rewarded for it.”

The fix is rewarding people for it.
The Ian Fleming books and the resulting movies are not 007 books and movies. They are books and movies about James Bond who is white, British and male as described by Ian Fleming.

I would love to see a movie focused on a non-white, non-male and possibly non-British character in the same universe, but they should not be James Bond. You could create a series of 007 universe characters with their own movies and eventually cash in Avengers style when they all come together in one movie working together to save the day.
Due to the finite speed of light, for many of those galaxies the images are a snapshot of several billion years ago. So we have no idea of what is thriving there today.
I used to watch Koyaanisqatsi in the Valhalla, an "encore" cinema in Glebe (Sydney, Australia). This, and Spinal Tap, and 2001. Oh, and A Clockwork Orange. This is back when VHS players were a luxury item, and seeing old movies was difficult or impossible. The Valhalla also ran controversial new movies, which usually meant gay themed like My Beautiful Laundrette, which mainstream cinemas would not touch.

The Valhalla published 3 month (or 6 month, I don't remember now) calendars that were about the size of a tabloid double-page spread. They were a common sight on fridge doors.
why would it be?
it is just a question of who (how many?) pays the infrastructure and not how much the infrastructure costs
Go look up banana trick, aka PLU 4011.

This shoplifting joke is thanks to the replacement of humans with these terrible self(aka unpaid) scan machines.

Stuff gets put in as bananas, and then weighed. You pay $.29/lb for whatever. And this works beautifully for high price stuff like steaks and the like.

Not that I advocate physical theft, but it's definitely a thing. And it's a thing where more people are being screwed. I sure as hell don't get a "you scan it" discount, officially.

https://losspreventionmedia.com/the-banana-trick-and-other-a...

And there's plenty other 'tricks' aka shoplifting that can be done to little risk, primarily due to companies fucking customers over by making us unpaid employees.

Excuse me while I cry an alligator tear for them

Edit: tough crowd, I see. You all don't get it. Shoplifting has increased by like 600% because companies are getting rid of cashiers. It's corporate greed is what's allowing shoplifting with the thin veneer of 'legitimacy' to happen. (Legitimacy of 'i scanned it but oh well, wrong barcode/plu.)

And I find it funny, because corporate greed is triggering revenge shoplifting, for customers being forced to be unpaid employees. And the u-scan-its are basically idiot jackpot machines with anyone with low ethics.
They did, and therefore never made a phone.
> I don't understand why people who make this argument think it's OK for the US government to spy on the private communications of all Chinese citizens but not for it to spy on those of American citizens. Is it OK for China to spy on American citizen's private communications, then?

I don't think it's a matter of what's "ok" or not, it's a matter of winning.

If spying in general is ok, it's of course ok no matter who engages in it. But it's not about whether it's ok or not, it's about what citizens of a particular country want for their own interests. If spying on another nation's citizens makes you safer, you may feel good about that. But being spied on by other nations probably isn't great for you, so it's to be fought against.

I think spying in general is not ok, in the same vein that war is not ok. Unfortunately, neither of these things are avoidable in the world we live in, so obviously I will be more in favor of actions that protect me and mine, and against actions that might make me less safe.

(This is all without addressing the question of whether or not spying on another nation's non-government, non-military population makes anyone safer. I genuinely have no idea.)

> Universal standards of human behavior and the right to personal privacy are hardly limited to some arbitrary nation-state boundary line, are they?

That's a wonderfully idealistic view, and I absolutely agree with it. But that's not the world we live in. Some people are by default adversaries because of the accident of the location of their birth. It's dumb, but that's how it is.
I have to agree with you. I grew up with electric coil stoves, and learned to cook with them, and had them most of my adult life so far until a few years ago when we bought our current home it came a gas stove/oven. I love it, I cooks so much better. Turn the knob and heat is just there now across the whole cook surface, the oven heats fast enough i don't bother to preheat anymore. the wok sucked on the coil stove.
> If you stop watching videos, there will be no reason to make the videos.

I had a happy life pre-Youtube. I don't think the world will be a worse place if 99% of Youtube videos disappear because they are not viable to make.
Will need to look into the Safari issue. Thanks for the feedback.
We have been working on a data version control tool called Oxen that is tackling many of your needs. Feel free to check it out here:

https://github.com/Oxen-AI/oxen-release#-oxen

Going down your list of requirements, Oxen has:

* Data versioning, similar paradigm to git, but built from the ground up for large ML datasets

* Inexpensive storage, comparable pricing to s3

* Branching/Merging for maintaining production training data sets

* Metadata storage and query capabilities, works with many structured data types. Have APIs for querying.

* User interface for less tech savy people, building out a hub at https://www.oxen.ai to enable this.

* Being able to define datasets that are a subset of the whole collected data (is this a similar requirement to querying?)

* Data ingestion pipeline - engineers would have to hook into APIs or CLI tools right now.

Feel free to check it out and leave any feedback on the GitHub repo!
EnTT and ImGui, or how to reconcile ECS and GUIs?
Is budget size the singular metric by which government power and capability is measured?

Lack of success (and, frankly, probably authentic desire) in one dimension is not evidence of lack of success or desire in another dimension. Government power is not as simple as “more dollar = more powerful.”

https://youtu.be/mtPgUrVPXeI
I agree that we don't know exactly what is happening at any time in the model, but there's limits.

Sydney has no genitalia, no hormones, no sex drive. It does not "desire" someone. It may have a theory of mind, but clearly any AI saying that it loves someone is just working from its training data. The article treats this as though there was an actual intention there, rather than just a model repeating its training [0].

Just as obviously, this is a journo playing to our human desire to prevent aliens from running away with our women - any thought of non-humans breeding with humans triggers something pretty deep in us. Well played, sir. Take your paycheck, sit down, and please stop pushing the buttons.

The AIs are not going to take over the world in the sense that this article talks about. They are not invented by supernatural forces beyond our ken, as it suggests. This is a human emotional reaction to things that appear to be intelligent. I agree that this generation of AI is going to hit a brick wall and the shortcomings will become obvious, but the emotional reaction will be the same. I think it will be another 10-20 years before we solve some of the technical challenges in this generation of AI. But we're having the discussion about AI, and the emotional reaction to it, now. Which is probably good, because by the time we develop actual AI we'll have been living with our current level of "almost-AI" since we were kids and we'll be used to it.

And to answer the question: Every technology is dangerous. That has never stopped us from using it.

[0] Though, of course, that raises questions about what an "intention" is in human terms, too. Are we just "repeating our training"? I think not, at least for sex & love - there are too many hormones involved.
The 4 case examples in the article are absolutely slackers. Not mentioning a 6 figure cloud inefficiency, or knowingly shipping bugs, or leaving 100's of diffs for compiler warnings and not publishing them.

You're right about not being able to tell a genuinely mediocre developer from an intentionally mediocre one... unless they tell on themselves like the above did.

>Do you stop talking to a colleague because they have never found a security vulnerability and fixed it?

This feels like a reach? Obviously not, I'm perfectly cordial to everyone I work with. If they find a security vulnerability, and don't fix or even bother reporting it then I'll obviously think less of them and probably not give them a referral. But I'd never hold it against someone for not identifying one or accidentally shipping one.
I agree! I was responding as an example to help disprove 'if somebody starts early, they're good.' I think there are benefits and drawbacks to each type of learning. There's also a lot of things I have some incomplete knowledge of but have never learned the appropriate way/have blind spots about and a lot of things I had to learn the hard way that would have gone way more smoothly if I'd opted for a CS education or learned differently.
No

And if you decide to, you should make that decision one day in the future when the shock has worn off.
Will certainly clear up the pricing section. Yes, "$" is supposed to indicate US dollar.
> I don't share this opinion personally, it would be only two times worse, it could be considered but at 50 to 100 times worse than non fossil tech, it's just not worth investing.

This ain't about investments for the long term, it's about having a transition fuel into fully renewable, and that is needed for any realistic approach to the problem.

As the fossil fuel reliance doesn't only extend to the energy sector, but also manufacturing industries, where hydrocarbons, as a resource, are responsible for pretty much everything that defines modern life. [0]

> Additionally to these environmental problems, it's one of most expensive infrastructure-wise

The infrastructure is expensive, but it's also the only existing energy infrastructure which can realistically be retooled for renewable replacement through green hydrogen.

Now you can point out how hydrogen has also expensive infrastructure and even worse storage problems, which is true. But as of right now, green hydrogen is the only plausible way to wean ourselves off our fossil fuel dependence as a manufacturing resource [1].

It's a dimension to this way too few people have on their radar, as most of the public debate is solely centered on electricity generation from fossil fuels, when that's actually the easiest problem to fix with renewables.

But the dependencies on fossil fuels as manufacturing resource, fixing those is a much bigger and involved task than making electricity grids green and renewable.

[0] https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/11/f68/Products...

[1] https://www.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/zv/de/ueber-fraunhofer...
The copyright might be groundless, but using the name "Minetest" is incredibly risky as basically any court will decide it's trademark infringement, as it's too confusingly similar to "Minecraft".

If I were the creator, I'd change the name before I'm forced to.
“Undertrained” because Boeing told them extra training g wasn’t necessary.[1]

Both pilots had multiple thousands of flight hours (well beyond the minimum 1500 required to co-pilot in the US). Only the co-pilot of the Ethiopian Air flight would have been deemed too new to fly for a US airline (and even then, only post-Colgan Air 3407).

1 - https://fortune.com/2020/01/14/boeing-lion-air-extra-737-max...
This is particularly ironic:

> In 1923, Midgley took a long vacation in Miami to cure himself of lead poisoning. He said, "I find that my lungs have been affected and that it is necessary to drop all work and get a large supply of fresh air."
It's even worse for people who don't even have that option.
You're being sarcastic, but in a generalized sense that's exactly what it is: of course spying is ok/good when it's your country doing it to someone else! Obviously that spying will enrich your country, and might even make you safer.

But duh, of course it's bad when someone else spies on you! That can only make you less safe.

It's not about "ok", it's about winning the "war".
Sounds like something that would be good to consult a lawyer about
The fourth question is in a later blog post, "The Neon God" - https://paulkingsnorth.substack.com/p/the-neon-god
I'm curious what you, or HN generally, thinks about .lol.
What should the consequence be for bankers who take too much risk, their banks' failure spreading to the wider banking system, sending the economy into a recession and millions of people into poverty?

Consequences (claw back) is the least that should happen, but it doesn't help the victims and might still incentivize short term risk taking (I win vs you loose). The solutions that the article offers (only allow long term incentives, include the interest of the entire banking system) might actually stimulate better risk-taking behavior. The real economy is slow, bankers' incentives should be too.
> This feels like a reach? Obviously not, I'm perfectly cordial to everyone I work with.

Sorry if you were offended, but I didn't mean that you do. Nobody does. That was a rhetorical question to emphasise my point.
Those economies are for the cloud provider, not you. The cost to you is set at just less than their best guess at what you think self-hosting will cost you.

Cloud hosting only makes sense in a case that your capacity needs are changing rapidly and unpredictably, or the case where you’re so big that the cloud hosting company is effectively a department. Any other time it will almost certainly be cheaper to self host.
The subtitle is “What Washington and Its Arab Partners Must Do to Stop the Shootout.”
Does it? I'm not aware of any way to share main memory with the Jetson CUDA cores.

If I'm wrong I'd love a pointer to the docs about it!
That is so refreshing, yeah the lenovo P series just ignores USB-PD inputs as it nominally wants 135W external power minimum. The kicker is it rarely ever draws more than 90w
Xylene
AI generated T-Shirt images?

Forget all of that. I can't even find a simple plain cotton tee that is well made and reasonably priced.
In that case, would you agree if we modified the GP's statement to say:

"The existence of, and participation in, FVEY is espionage against the people of the United States."

If so, then presumably all the arguments against it are still valid, no? Assuming we can agree that "treason against the people of the United States" and "espionage against the people of the United States" are at least in the same ballpark of badness?
>> I don't know much practically about how hard it would be to take the Whisper PyTorch (1 or 2?) trained models & to make good use of them elsewhere.

What do you mean by "elsewhere"?

The whisper models can be used without much effort. The tooling provided by OpenAI allows for them to be used and installed in python with ease. People use them in companies to transcribe internal media datasets. No need for CPP implementation for internal uses.

Main problem is when _on device_ is required and the OpenAI model is not quantised and so use on say a smartphone becomes trickier.
> I have a feeling we aren’t going to solve this problem anytime soon, as the simulations required appear to be so large they are beyond our reach.

That's what we need quantum computers for!

Seriously, crypto breaking problems tend to get all the attention when we are talking about quantum computing, but one of the most promising application of quantum computers is modeling quantum systems. Studying the health impact of substances involves a lot of chemistry, which is a quantum process. A quantum computer could help with modeling the interactions between artificial substances and biomolecules.
Tern Vektron !
Is your implication that private aviation has a better safety record?
A true classic, I can't say that this is what got me into semiconductor physics but I also can't say that it was not what I based my understanding of semiconductor physics on for many years...
A broken man's homemade, seaworthy ship rests in the Canadian prairie (2015)
A good headline. It's important to remind that one should keep on improving their thinking to be a good engineer. All the techniques are secondary to the conceptual toolbox of your mind.
you just described any taxi driver or uber. uber even has separate category for more luxury :D

of course it is a strech but still I think valid point
Llama.cpp is more of a raw library with a demo ./main.

Kobold cpp uses llama.cpp and provides a minimalist web UI. So if you want a chat assistant using llama.cpp on CPU, kobold cpp is probably what you want.
Few markets today are free markets. Politics drives the growth of very costly "renewables" which are unreliable and intermittent - not a free market. Politics has made nuclear absurdly more costly for no good reason, just environmentalist antipathy towards nuclear. Fortunately, there is evidence that that is changing, given the abject failure of renewables to actually support the requirements of a stable civilization, proven at extremely high cost.
“One assumes”? I don’t.

“Underutilized”, that’s a notable word choice. It implies that the land should be utilized more? With whose interests in mind? Who decides? Over what time frame?

Talking about utilization in this way is a decent predictor of a libertarian framing. It is worth saying in tech forums that libertarianism isn’t the only political philosophy that includes market forces as a key analysis mechanism.

I prefer the study of political economy over traditional economics, because it admits a much wider lens of the underlying aims of a well functioning economic system. It doesn’t have to be economic efficiency as defined by a summation of individual utilities. That is only one mathematically convenient objective function; there are others.

Economics is a big tent. Economists have varying political philosophies. Relatively few educated economists hold idealistic notions about how well actual markets function to optimize a social welfare function.

But from what I’ve seen, relatively few outspoken libertarians rigorously challenge their assumptions about markets or the overall objective function. Many conflate a descriptive theory with a normative value system.

Yes, this is a long reply to a seven word comment. Why bother? Given the context around the thread, plus some consistent blind spots from HN comments, suggests to me that many here should go deeper and ask more questions about political economy.
How do you do this? How do you make money to survive?
The FAA works in the field.
I'm not claiming you are sabotaging things or going out of your way to do poor work, that's a given.

However, based on your phrasing, you make it clear you're intentionally putting in less work than you could, and recognize it's less than your employer assumes you are.

You didn't say "Even if I tell my boss I finished my work, there aren't more tickets", you phrased it as "do the least amount necessary, and ignore everything else".

That last sentiment is the thing I'm saying not everyone can do, the thing that may mentally be worse than the benefit.

As above, good on your for having a relationship with work where you can do that. It seems healthy.
Your guess is correct, the expiration is what adds the security.

The main security need this is addressing is terminating access to ex-employees/contractors given a requirement for shared credentials. If the shared credentials are not short term, you have to rotate credentials every time the team changes. If you don't have a system to do it automatically it's pretty easy to forget to do it or do it incompletely. So better just to do it very frequently and automatically so you don't even need to bother with a revocation process.

You might be thinking that you don't have any shared credentials, but effectively any credential that a server has access to is shared, because there's almost certainly at least two people with access to any given server.
Please read my post more carefully, I wrote (emphasis added) "Social-economic systems that cause below-replacement fertility are in this way much like parasites"

The system is the parasite, not the immigrants themselves. They are, in fact, its victims, as they will fall under the same below-replacement-fertility trap. Again, as I wrote in my post: "giving the parasite economic system a new host to feed on" - the new host being the immigrants.
For those like me who weren't aware of CTU, it is Cross Translation Unit analysis:

https://codechecker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/analyzer/user_g...

I noticed that codechecker can also ingest results from many different tools other than Clang:

https://codechecker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/supported_code_...