skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I own two restaurants and several years ago ate out at upscale restaurants four times a week. One thing the article doesn't touch on is that the labor shortage has decreased the quality of service, which makes it less desirable to eat out. I have gone to several restaurants where the employees are on AirPods (one employee was even listening as they served me.) Many of the best servers and bartenders I know left the profession during the pandemic and have not come back. One may wonder if this due to the lack of pay keeping up with inflation but the team I have makes $35 to $42 an hour, which is up substantially from before the pandemic.
Great comment!

>I think late architecture is orthogonal to functional, imperative

Absolutely. From a truly architectural view, procedural, functional, and method-oriented (current OO) are really only variations on the call/return architectural style. Good and sometimes important distinctions, but not really that far apart. They are very much about computing, results from inputs. That is an appropriate architecture for fewer and fewer programs.

See Why Architecture Oriented Programming matters

https://blog.metaobject.com/2019/02/why-architecture-oriente...

and

Can Programmers Escape the Gentle Tyranny of call/return?

https://2020.programming-conference.org/details/salon-2020-p...

> its solution is higher level than even functional programming

Yes. Well, functional actually gets most of its utility from being lower level as far as paradigms go (less powerful). But yes.

> and more abstract

No. Well, yes, if expressed with current programming languages. But that's part of the problem set, not part of the solution set. We should be able to express our architectures less abstractly, more concretely, but for that we need linguistic support. Which is why I am working on that:

http://objective.st

> I want software architecture to be cheap and easy to change without breaking any existing behaviours. I don't know much research on this subject.

There was quite a bit of research at CMU, for example on packaging mismatch. Famous paper Architectural Mismatch, Why Reuse is so hard, and the 10 year follow up in 2009: Architectural Mismatch: Why Reuse is Still So Hard

https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=107...*

Not much has changed since.

> https://github.com/samsquire/ideas4

> https://devops-pipeline.com

Will check those out. Dataflow is definitely a big part of it, with the extension of dataflow constraints (make, spreadsheets, "FRP"/"Rx"). But so is in-process REST with Storage Combinators!

And breaking down barriers between scripting and "real" programming.
Does anyone have tips on how to watch chess? I got pretty into chess during lockdown. I read several books on the subject, was playing a few hours each day. I had friends who got into it as well, and they would watch the tournaments and high profile matches, but I couldn't enjoy them. I didn't feel like I understood the game enough, and the commentary sometimes went over my head/went by too quickly. Anyone been in the same situation?
Fool, I have signal handlers defined for all signals! You won't be rid of me that easily!
Yes. This is the meta strategy. Nepo was also doing this when he was a point ahead.
There are some cases, like ADHD where body doubling actually helps productivity. So I wouldn’t be surprised if in office productivity was higher for those people.

I also think ADHD is significantly more prevalent among software engineers (mostly inattentive type) in my experience. My random guess would be close to 25 percent:)
In a democracy almost everything should be public. Our weapons for sure, perhaps not where they are located, but what we pay for yes.
I've been thinking about some kind of "regular human inspector" where companies have to pay a government inspector to just ask common sense questions and be a place to bring issues that can't be dealt with internally.

Since they change regularily, bribing becomes unrealistic, we don't need high salaries or expertise. It's a very coarse idea still.

I'm just rambling here!
nope, it both predated epstein conspiracy and grew out of the podesta email leaks.

i have been following since the start on 4chan because this is my local pizza shop
Human culture is like nothing else on planet earth for cooperation. Although I think a lot of the cooperative behaviour is still based on kin groups, we just aren't particularly precise about who is kin and who isn't. And those instincts get applied more generally than just our family.
Direct or indirect support from various corporations generally.
Generally the more transparency there is on both sides, the better:

This way, the market can punish bad behaviors (abusive landlords / problematic tenants) and reward those who act properly.
Financial aid is not race blind. There are no schools near me that have merit scholarships for white people, but plenty have merit scholarships for non whites.

I’ve researched this because I have kids, and where I grew up merit scholarships applied to all, but where I live now they will not receive any, at least in state. Unlike my parents, however, I’m not dirt poor and can set my kids up for success. If not for a merit scholarship, I likely would have followed my father and his father into a factory job.
I heard one of his employees joke that Elon could be the first murder victim in space.
> Funneling children into the arms of private businesses is fundamentally socialist redistribution

Mmm I'm going to take a very controversial stance here and say that no, privatizing education is not "fundamentally socialist distribution" or even "progressive" for that matter.

It absolutely is a money problem when teachers are spending their own salaries (already much lower than their EU counterparts) on classrooms. You can say there's corruption, that the money disappears, etc. but it's possible to solve the problems in public education by making sure the people molding the minds of the next generation make a decent living.

All my friends in academia were tired of being treated like shit (in both public and charter systems) and ended up pivoting to code where they make 2-3x the salary with dramatically less effort. Even worse for teachers in "inner cities" where the cost of living is higher. Small wonder that the US has some of the worst education outcomes compared to other "industrial liberal republics".
The CIA has no need to fund Icke
California’s Hypocritical Failure to Confront Poverty
Once CSS gets nesting [1] natively (ie, not having to use SCSS or Postcss) the total sum of improvements it will be 100x less annoying vs the early 2000s. Variables, grids, flex, container/media queries, math functions, clamp [2] etc make life so much easier.

The last thing is mixins/functions, but not sure if there's an RFC for that.

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/css-nesting-1/

[2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/clamp
Conscience is rarely a good thing.
IME this dividing line exists more in theory than practice. Maybe your partner feeling upset or rejected leads to a fight about something unrelated the next day. Or maybe it's easier to rebuff some nagging than to deal with an insecure partner who is good with boundaries but will still feel deeply bad about the rejection.

So-called "duty sex" has been recognized as a complex topic where consent is concerned. Surely this is a continuum rather than yes/no. I can't go around calling an ex-girlfriend a rapist because she nagged me for sex now and then.
My concern is one of jurisprudence, not science. To your question, many of the best sci-fi authors are in fact scientists.
Who actually records interviews?

Many states are two party consent. The company will absolutely not want it recorded so there will be no record of any mistakes related to illegal hiring practices.

I've had mock interviews recorded as part of business classes. Those would honestly be more helpful since they're individualized and can help you stop making mistakes.
I'm no linguist but I wonder if 'draughtsman' and 'marksman' might be examples of a fugen-S in English?
"Well duh just use this button combo nobody knows"

"Well duh just use a strong password instead of abc123"
Organized sedition, maybe, but "treason" is narrowly defined in the US constitution:

>Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

>The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood¹, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

¹: "Corruption of blood" is a legal term. This passage means that treason charges cannot be carried to future generations, they only apply to the person who committed the act.
When people say "food is a human right" they typically want the government to provide food to the hungry. They don't want to make it illegal to operate a restaurant.

When people say "housing is a human right", what they really mean is that they want to outlaw renting or even private home ownership. If the government moved every homeless person to Wyoming and gave them a home, that wouldn't be enough.
Thanks for role-playing the whistleblower's experience for us.
> why it's seen as acceptable to make broad generalizations based on race and sex in this way?

In the current climate, it is acceptable to make broad generalizations about white males, however if the same exact generalizations are made about black people, then they will call you racist (Black Lives Matter), or if you make the same exact generalizations about trans or non-binary people, you will also have problems. I don't think they are anti-Arab anymore, they lost interest in the War on Terror because it wasn't working. Instead, it looks like they are moving to demonize the Russians and the Chinese. Obviously, the climate will change at some point.
> nuanced remarks of individuals such as LeCun and Marcus

Literally guessed it from the title.

> In no corner of industrial AI does anyone seem to care whether such programs are going to achieve intelligence.

> [...later...]

> penned by a computer industry exec, ..., the authors make glib assertions about intelligence ... “The stakes could not be higher in training artificial general intelligence systems. AI is the first tool that convincingly replicates the unique capabilities of the human mind. ...”

Hmm emoji.
It's AWESOME!!! IE died! Bloated frameworks have become irrelevant! No more modernizers. You can just use it the way it's supposed to be used.

And let me take the opportunity to diss the failure that is mixing your styles into your layout with Tailwind and it's endless and illegible bloat of unreadable html.
I will be shocked if it does not emerge that he was being blackmailed in some way over pedophilia.
Don't forget Chernobyl too.
"Fun" fact about that, it was nationalized because it is a material for use in atomic bombs, in the 70 and 80 there wasn't another use for large scale lithium mining, except for that
In all dual-licensed FOSS projects which require licensees to comply with the terms of both licenses, both of them include an unlimited right to redistribution. Also, roughly no projects do that with the AGPL, since the AGPL includes the right to cast off any additional terms when redistributing.

But your intent, if you want to avoid for-profit organizations using your software, is to impose a restriction on users not to redistribute the software in certain ways. It is your right to add such a restriction to your software, but it is no longer FOSS, since that term necessarily implies an unlimited right to redistribution (within the law).
I came here to say the extension should be .QOK and pronounced “kwok” and that’s that.
Hmm. I just get it to consistently crash on my 14 Pro Max, latest stable iOS build. At least TestFlight will send those reports on over.
Keynote: The Road to LiveView 1.0 by Chris McCord
By that logic 100m dashing should be abondoned after the invention of cars.
I've been a web designer since 1993. It was nice in 1993 because you didn't even have a background color. The color of your page was the default color of the window on your OS. Usually grey.

Then we went through 25 years of dark ages where there were plenty of really great ideas for layout which were completely lost to horrible and competing and half-assed executions.

We are now finally in the golden age of layout where I can make something that looks great on all displays if I have the time and talent to do it. Sadly that is in short supply.

I think we have Chrome to thank for modern web design. Once the browser competition was completely and utterly crushed and everyone was forced to sign on to The One True Layout Engine the benevolent dictators at Google set things on the right path.

There are still edges cases (which JPEG replacement will win?!), but they are now blessedly few and far between.
1) Criminals infiltrate government.
2) Government makes it legal to avoid taxation by placing funds in offshore accounts.
3) Large sums of money are hidden in Panamanian accounts via Mossack Fonseca.
4) Someone leaks documentation of these accounts to journalists.
5) Criminals say it's not whistleblowing because no laws were broken, it's just snooping into private affairs.

Of course, ordinary citizens don't get such privileges. If they could, everyone could get out of student loan debt by setting up a Delaware shell corporation controlled by another family member or group of friends, transferring their loan debt to it, and then let the shell corporation go bankrupt. The only downside would be that nobody would be that likely to loan you more money, but you'd have no more debt to pay off.
We had something administered through my university called FAQs (Faculty Assessment Questionnaire?) that were published for students and would tell you how much time a class would take per week, etc that ended up being more useful overall. Does every university have these?
All throughout history, it is usually another society who comes in and takes an already occupied land by force and then charges a fee for the previous people to continue using it. Then there are complex laws set up to make it impossible for these previous people's to own their land again, becoming indebted in one way or another. After a while, after this land has been transferred, typically amongst the families of those who first took the land (or their friends), some people forget this history or are ignorant of it, and just go along with what has been done for years. Inevitably, those with the excess monetary value gained from rent is used to expand and establish these kinds of societal institutions so that it is part of the zeitgeist and thus a controversial take to think this kind of institution is an immoral, or bad, or exploitative one.
False. I do professional front end development and haven't browser tested with any rigor in over a year. Who cares about Opera. Seriously.
He did also build it though…
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104344
Also worth pointing out that much of EVs and grid storage are shifting to cobalt-free lithium iron phosphate batteries. Many people aren't aware of that.
TVM Unity has a CUDA backend, and TensorCore MMA instructions are supported, so it wouldn't be hard to turn this option on.

It's on our plan, but we haven't looked to enable them by default in the first place, mainly because we wanted to demonstrate it running on all GPUs including old models that don't come with TensorCore at all.
I’m not sure I understand your question, but works that are out of copyright aren’t relevant to the reasons that copyright exists, or to the fact that Amazon is allowing fake publishers to undercut legitimate publishers with extremely low-quality copies.

Copyright grants a time-limited monopoly to the reproduction of works by their authors. The idea is not that the economy benefits from protection forever, but that the authors have enough time to recoup their costs before the works become public. Many people (me included) think copyright terms are too long, but here we are discussing the idea that the term length should be zero, which I speculate most people would agree is too short. Having the economic incentive to produce good works is important to our economy, and if works can be stolen and faked immediately and the authors can’t profit from them, there is no incentive to make good things.

I guess to clarify… the quality of a reproduction hurts consumers when the quality is lower than the authentic original, like the case of the Amazon books in this article. But generally speaking, quality isn’t super high on the list of reasons for copyrights, or on the broader economic arguments. The primary reason, it is argued, that fakes and copying hurts consumers is because it’s a drain on the economic incentives for creative and productive people to author new works.
One of those "book nook" things in the shape of a Laundry IT office would be pretty fun (until the SCORPION STARE cameras blow up the neighbouring shelf).
I mean sometimes things are simple, and are put in docs because someone doesn't get what's obvious, I had to sometimes to shut myself from offending people who were stuck on screens that were so obvious and instead of trying and fail or google, waited for the help of someone to unstuck them, docs exist with simple things inside and that is not enough to measure if those things are simple or not, they also exist like if that one guy who couldn't understand the obvious and had to ask, does a doc that documents something that was understood without it by 999 people, make what is documented unclear because of 1 that couldn't see?

if you go to a place where you see a sign "Don't touch the fire", does it make not touching the fire not obvious because the sign exist? Or we have to put obvious sign for those who aren't cerebrally developed enough to understand it without the sign?
I think Fabi is licking his chops thinking he can now finally be a world champion since Carlsen is out and Ding maybe won't be too hard to best. He predicted lots of lines in the match or saw better ones from his commentator chair (granted the eval bar helps a lot). But you are right he will have to take some risks probably.
War is a team sport. People have a reason to work for a common goal that is bigger than themselves. And that requires a supresion of a lot of competitive spirit. Not everyone can win a medal, be a general, or an astronaut. It takes thousands of normal people doing boring jobs.
Nonsense. He gave the material to Greenwald and a Guardian journalist in Hong Kong. He stayed in Hong Kong for a while, and when it became apparent that he could not go to other countries he went to Russia.

Whether the Guardian published the info after that is irrelevant. Also note that Greenwald asked him to publish anonymously, which Snowden declined.

Anyway, the U.S. could pardon him and he would go back.

All these armchair whistleblowers here are mindblowing.
Well yeah, the match format wasn't ridiculous in the 80s and 90s when it was still human prep vs human prep.
'ChatGPT Does 80% of My Job' – How AI Enables People to Work 2nd and 3rd Jobs
Just want to say thank you. Great article and really enjoyed your other about flexbox vs. grid.
Any reasonable review shouldn't assume any validity of the first "attempt" given the improbable series of "accidents" the night of his death. If anything, it is more likely it was fabricated or used to support the narrative. I mean, the guy had dirt on billionaires and ultra-powerful politicians and you want to be believe it was an actual suicide? That approach would produce such bad investigations.
I get questioning why someone would expect this given the world we live in, but why would we hope for it? How about because the world would just be a nicer place to live if every transaction around the place people live weren’t undertaken on the basis that both parties are trying to screw each other?
No that’s not true for induction - the controls are immediate and very precise.
Highly recommend Chessnetwork vids

https://youtube.com/@ChessNetwork
Lawsuits cost money, and in most cases there tends to be a large wealth disparity between landlord and tenant. Landlords know this, not just in general but also in particular since they've seen your finances (proof of income etc.) before letting you move in. So when the time comes to consider whether to try to screw you over, the choice tends to be rather easy.
You mean like with brow.sh?
Were backups ever successfully restored, for any purpose previously?

That seems like the only remaining "plot hole", from a technical perspective.
So, Microsoft should never allow their OS to evolve beyond existing hardware? Doesn't seem a realistic expectation. The hardware is still usable with an older OS or Linux/BSD. No one is being forced to throw out old computers.
You understand that Palo Alto et co are on different power grids to Atherton/LAH/MV etc right?

Highly localized across the entire bay for the atmospheric river a couple weeks ago.

Again, you don’t know what you’re talking about.
I like the idea of Jellyfin, but I had a lot of performance issues with Jellyfin and ended up having to switch back to Plex.
You can watch chess streamers like Gothan Chess and similar. It makes games more aproachable to some degree.
The property's transfer or sale may be prohibited by the terms of inheritance.

IANAL and am mostly familiar with this type of situation from rom-coms about down-on-their-luck dukes who live in crumbling, unsellable castles, so I'm not sure if that scenario truly exists in law or if it's just a handy conceit.
If lithium mining brings in money to buy water and other things as well, then it's not great, but it's probably the better choice.
"How" left off of article title. I understand why that happens though.
I didn't assume they were even really a cop.

They said "speaking as a cop" and then said something that can't be reasonably interpreted any other way than outlandish. Even a real cop who really liked that, would know enough not to admit it in public. That means it doesn't actually matter if they are really a cop or not, either way they were only illuminating a point, not litteral.

Maybe the world would be a better place if everyone didn't jump to the worst possible explanation, and then act as if that were the fact. There is no reason to believe that an actual cop actually just admitted to enjoying the freedom to abuse innocents, but you just ran with that and amplified it anyway. That's really all on you.
Look at literally any poll on this issue. Here [1] is one from late 2019 from Pew. 66% of Americans think the risks of government data collection outweigh the benefits, fewer than 25% think they benefit from such behavior. And almost nobody knows what the government is doing with all of this information they're collecting.

It's certainly not indifference, it's that our media and democracy aren't really functioning properly. I can go look at any news site and regardless of the site's political bias - there's a recurring theme. You'll see lots of pro war stuff and lots stuff on topics that makes people really dislike each other. But these sort of issues where people overwhelmingly feel one way, and the political establishment feels another? Yeah, those are all strangely absent.

And come next year? These same topics will receive about as much coverage as COBOL at a hot trends in computing conference. Instead we'll get two people each telling you to vote for them because the other guy's awful. The one bright side is we can safely say that they're both right.

[1] - https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/11/15/key-takea...