skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The number of bytes transmitted back is not material to users' interests. Hostile parties can observe non delivery with accounts of their own.
Most weeds regrow easily if you don't pull out their root structure.
It's the same definition as what a Celt is: someone who honestly identifies as one.

In the past, we thought both were more exact (mostly because gender was a synonym for "sex" aka "allosome configuration" aka "XX haver").
This just isn't the case with modern phones. 5G and 4G use active beam forming. It usually only takes a single tower to figure out bearing and signal strength can indicate range. With just one tower, a carrier knows where a 5G phone is within 10m. Combining multiple towers shrinks that rapidly.
Avoiding Undefined Behaviour When Finding and Reducing Compiler Bugs [pdf]
I think it's just going to lead to higher Netflix prices in Canada. The requirements honestly seem too harsh. 30% of revenue, not even profits.

Ultimately, lots of Canadian artists and content producers will benefit, though other industries (software engineers, advertising, marketing, management, etc.) may be impacted. I'm.. kind of OK with this, but I wonder if the requirement will make these streaming services produce content that people aren't even asking for, just to satisfy the policy
Could say that about social media or video games.
Doesn’t the US have a much higher incarceration rate than most… developed countries, at least?
I thought as much

Presumably this will also break Camas search
The same thing happened to me and my buddy in February.

Turns out that an “Amsterdam region” ticket does not get you back from The Hague.

We too got stuck behind the turnstiles, bewildered. We called for help through one of those intercom pole thingies and they buzzed us through.

As someone from Texas, the idea that a city 40 miles away might be in a different region hadn’t even crossed my mind :)
It's useful for the russians to amplify any divide in a country, especially if they can poison the conversation about it. They will likely also amplify more rabidly pro-monarchy positions as well.
Shutterstock Showcase: Gen AI
You lost me at the third subheading of the first Google result: “Effects of EMF on the body”.

There’s a lot of conditional situations the protocol sets up that are hard to achieve and measure.

If the Protocol doesn’t work, it seems like the explanation given by the “practitioner” will be something akin to “you didn’t believe hard enough”.

edit: I am now wondering whether that section is a honeypot to get rid of "non-believers" before they commit any further.
Can you talk more about how you got your data from them?
Doesn't your phone ping off the tower regularely anyway? I've always understood that without a physical switch to the antenna there's no way to actually know
> Overall, Canada's internet will look very Chinese or possibly even North Korean by the time the next elections roll about.

Oh, I see. And you're accusing the CBC of "bias"?
> Overall, Canada's internet will look very Chinese or possibly even North Korean by the time the next elections roll about.

Aren't most Anglophone countries besides the US like this?
It’s intelligent but very short sighted, it can’t plan far beyond and really self generate independently beyond the initial few prompts
> Better to leave the phone at home. Or, at least in a Faraday cage you can remove it from if you are desperate.

There have been cases where the phone _going offline_ during the "event" have been used as evidence.
I think you're vastly overestimating how much people care about security.
> And one way for the executive branch to check the judicial branch is to disregard judicial rulings that are blatantly unconstitutional, just like the judicial branch regularly invalidates entire laws and government programs.

That is totally not how this works. But if it did... what decisions would you have the executive ignore? Dred Scott? That would be fine. The one in 1942 that allows the Interstate Commerce clause to apply to what is clearly in-state commerce? Yeah, that one, too.

How about Roe v. Wade? That was pretty clearly going beyond the bounds of the Constitution. ("Penumbra"? Why not just admit that you're stretching it past the breaking point?) Do you really want Richard Nixon deciding whether he can throw out Roe v. Wade?

The one time that I know of where the president blatantly threw out a Supreme Court decision was when Andrew Jackson ignored the court's decision that whites could not encroach on Cherokee land.

Do you really want the president deciding which Supreme Court decisions are "clearly unconstitutional"? Not only is the president less of a constitutional scholar than the justices are, he is also more blatantly political than they are. He's going to judge the judges' decisions? That's a terrible idea, and it's absolutely not how checks and balances work.

And the fact that you think that is both good and constitutional makes me really unimpressed with your view that the debt ceiling is clearly unconstitutional...
I gotta ask... why? It's your house, anyone who could get your info from a teleco and wants to know your location almost certainly knows your home address, so this is just to protect from know when you're at your house? If you're still turning on cellular around town too, a decently useful map of your location history would exist anyway?

I'm not trying to be snarky or anything, I'm genuinely curious here what the benefit is to you.
Did you look at the papers I linked? One is about how Australia instituted a ban on guns and immediately not only saw a drop to zero mass shootings but also numerous other benefits including general murder rates dropping
I love when people say 'quietly' as if it's a conspiracy
By this logic if you watch Star Wars you are a racist because Walt Disney was (apparently) racist.
"Anything is better than nothing" has become an excuse to do nothing and profit in the age of AI.

It is the same grift as used by faith healing and woo. If anything is better than nothing then a placebo(nothing) is better than nothing.

This is unacceptable and dehumanising.
> This is what I have done for years: Cellular is always off anywhere near my house.

Do you disable cell service manually when you're going home?
I think it was a combination of things.

1. Inertia: Sanitizing and disinfection was what was recommended in March 2020. Even masking was actively discouraged until later.

2. "We have to do something." "This is something."

3. Handwashing/hand sanitizing and sanitizing surfaces are visible actions that reassure some people. Ventilation and filtration improvements are generally not visible.

4. Ventilation and filtration improvements are expensive and, for an institution, require certified professionals to design and implement. There aren't enough of these people and not enough equipment to implement this for every building in a timely manner. Handwashing and clorox wipes are cheap and anyone can use them.

Personally I think that COVID is likely going to be with us for some time to come and will cause significant disability as people get infected repeatedly. I think eventually we will see significant uptake of ventilation/filtration improvements.
I don't know where you live but I see plate-obscuring covers all the time in Seattle. We have several local toll highways, which is probably related.
Jonesy: "Sir, remember the dispatch we got about Russian sub skippers running the Canis ridge at high speed because they had hyper accurate surveys of the underwater canyons?

Capt Mancuso: "Yeah, yeah, red route 1"

- The Hunt for Red October
many of the americans that yearn so hard for the nordic systems have only seen the brochure, and not seen how it actually is. Even most people living in the nordics dont fully grasp just how bad things are unless they are deeply inside it themselves.

im not saying the US system is perfect, far from it, but there is definitely a case of "grass is greener" going on, and people tend to focus extremely heavily on the bad things they see/experience locally, and are completely oblivious to negatives elsewhere
Airplane mode should do that though. Of course with the negative that you're not able to do anything online, but well... You can't have your cake and eat it :)

In the old days we had pagers to be still reachable and yet anonymous. But those networks have died out pretty much everywhere, sadly.
Wow, so much to unpack here.

> Could a religious liberty case be made?

No.

> I mean, I am not religious, but I’d be surprised if the Christian god would be OK killing a person over a technicality.

Does the defendant have to believe in Christian God? Does he have to state this belief publicly? Does the state recognize only this god or all gods? What is the standard?

> Oklahoma is a pretty religious place, right?

I don't see how this is relevant. The only issue here is the law of the state of Oklahoma. The separation of church and state is not something we can selectively ignore.

> I imagine the execution could be hard to perform if enough people didn’t comply.

Well, only one person has to not comply. That person is the governor, who is tasked with enforcing the law.

> At least it could be enough of a delay to stall a bit and hopefully work things out…

"Hopefully" "work out" how? You mean like the second coming of Christ and he becomes governor and pardons this guy?
>The government has insisted that the legislation is not intended to regulate independent content creators.

What does that means? If I upload videos on Youtube, then I'm probably in the clear. But if I make my own website with videos on it, am I still an "independent content creators" or am I now a streaming service in need of being regulated? How big I need to become before the law apply to me? Is this a new barrier to entry so the little guys are stuck with existing platform?
I still really like Vice News, but they do a lot less investigative pieces that are on the ground. Their reporting on Ukraine in 2014/15, Syria and even North Korea were top notch. I hope at least the News portion is bought up by Axios or someone. Vice itself, I could do without. It hasn't been relevant in a long time and is mostly just living on rage clicks. Like BuzzFeed, it felt like just adding "News" to a brand that largely wasn't actually "News" was a mistake. You'd got to vice.com and it would be a heap of trash, but go to "vicenews.com" (now just redirects to a section of Vice) and you'll get much better content.

For instance, on vicenews.com now you see "Ukraine Is Now Using Steam Decks to Control Machine Gun Turrets" which is interesting...then on vice.com you have "Ring In #MasturbationMay With MysteryVibe's Massive Sex Toy Sale"...what is this mix? Why did they do this? vice.com is also full of stoner content, it's wild.
No state requires permission to protest. States do require permission to block the streets. However, the courts force such permitting decisions to be neutral to the political message.
Disabling Google Play Services isn't the problem. The problem is that a huge number of apps will not run without Google Play Services, because Google puts all their fun/useful APIs and toolkits in it so they can be closed-source.
Because that titling doesn't result in as many clicks.
This annoys me to no end as well. I always need to look at the device to see which is which.

Can’t figure out why someone thought this was the best design.
I'm being pedantic. The trial already happened. We don't know what the outcome would have been if the witness' shortcomings were known to the jury.
It depends on the city and where you're staying. Heathrow to much of central London can literally be about $100 cheaper on the tube and just as fast if you just have carryon luggage during normal times of the day. (Don't remember the situation last time I was in Copenhagen.)

I agree that tourists in an unfamiliar city will often just take a taxi by default though.
Perhaps I don't fully understand the situation in America (in my country a vehicle will generally have a license plate when it rolls off the dealer's lot, which stays on the vehicle throughout its entire life) but what would anyone need an e-ink plate for?
> anyone who could get your info from a teleco and wants to know your location almost certainly knows your home address

I think OP might be in a jurisdiction where you don't need to provide your address (yet) when

> using prepaid cash purchased SIMs
Every day somebody is born who hasn’t heard somebody say “triangulate the signal” on some procedural.

Meanwhile the intersection of “hasn’t heard this” and “is intentionally turning off location services on phones” is, I imagine, an extremely small cohort of the phone using population. But this would be a good sort of public poll to do!
There is a reason why "leave your phone at home" is well-worn advice and a common refrain in opsec communities. You can never really know for sure what is being tracked.
Cynthia Rudin and interpretable ML models
The CBC is biased because they'll be a significant beneficiary of the bill -- they're a big source of Canadian content that others can license, so this will help them get paid.

No need to go deep into conspiracy land for the bias.
Well, someone has to get permission. It's not like every protester has to register with name and photo ID.
I've experimented with this and other methods for home use. One thing I've found very effective is steam and boiling water - especially for pavers. It does more than just killing the leaves - the boiling water penetrates and kills roots.
> > There is no explicit power for the executive to ignore the judicial.

> But there is: it's called the Constitution. Not any particular clause or article, but the whole document

Then it's not in the constitution.

> The executive is allowed to check the judicial if the judicial ignores the Constitution.

He is? Where, specifically, does it say that?

> How else is the executive supposed to check the judicial?

He's not. The senate is, by impeachment.

Stop making stuff up, and actually read what's there.
First Resonance | Full-time | Senior Software Engineer | Onsite in Downtown Los Angeles

We’re looking for great software engineers to help us build a productive and reliable platform for the vast range of manufacturing users who use our software to build hardware every day. Our customers are building electric airplanes (eVTOLs), satellites, autonomous vehicles, robotic farms, and more. Our team comes from SpaceX, NASA, Zoox, Apple, and other world-changing hardware companies.

https://boards.greenhouse.io/firstresonance/jobs/5581911003
> More mundane tasks such as providing employment verification letters or moving employees between departments will likely be fully automated

Is someone actually writing these at IBM? At every company I have been with, they have been freely available for download from the HR portal. I thought this was a DB lookup from a login and a PDF generator.
I think this is a good question, but I'm assuming that this is happening anyways: Few constitutions have provisions forcing tech bros to live in the city. If they move to the burbs without public transit, they are being subsidized via roads and car traffic, which is arguably worse.
I bet it costs three cubic acres of money to buy.
Without taking any position on this post itself or flagging of it:

flagging has just become abusive. It needs serious reform, @dang.

I can't speak for the original rationale, but it seems like the intent must be to remove posts or comments that are clearly offensive on some semi-legal grounds (obscene, advocating violence, etc.) Now it's become just "I don't like this."

There are many possible reforms, but off the top of my head, changing "flag" to be nothing but a suggestion to the mods might fix it. It would do nothing unless a mod agreed. And the flagger's id should be public and it should cost them something (karma points, maybe).
Quickly looking at https://news.ycombinator.com/ask, your impression appears to be correct. I don't see any specific technical questions in the first 60 there. They're all high level.
There are a lot of "lies" when it comes to location based ecosystem and permissioning on modern smart phones.

1. The fact is that some applications require any access to the physical location(lat long) to function is a lie. For example many app just needs to know if you are at "home/work/fav place" without knowing the lat long of it e.g. function for Assistant based Reminders to be triggered. yet google or ios just make access to location a creepy sounding binary permission with a less creepy variation on preciseness of location access. In reality these should be two permissions.

2. The fact that some apps need background location access to function is a lie. Locations can remain on the phone only for many apps and this can be enforced as a permission or the OS. For example Navigation can be done by rendering the blue dot on a screen and that is technically doable at a privileged OS level service without exposing the lat long info to apps. The apps just need to provide tiles and relevant styles to render. Garmin like navigators have been doing it for years with hardware older than smartphones. Google lies to you when it says it needs your lat long to function. In reality its just needed to target you with ads. "Nearby" functionality could be enforced by sharing location in an encrypted fashion through P2P networks, though apple in fairness is doing better at privacy of location sharing; Google has none of this AFAIK and at worst they both retain the data(or atleast we have no confidence if they do or not). In reality background location access could be almost exclusively be made more private by being on device only for many apps.

3. The fact that Google/Apple are doing public good by providing location permission is a lie. Try turning off precise location in a Google supported Android, the experience is horrible.

4. Non PlayStore installations on AOSP by other providers could be somehow better for Location Privacy is a lie. I will never buy a samsung phone because they are very likely to install various Location, Wifi, BLE Service Providers for serving up data for Location or Location Inference which is lucrative to closed ecosystems of Apps by Big Tech(FAANG et. al). These services are more of black and back room deals that don't show up conspicuously in public discussions and undermine privacy.

Better and more nuanced permissioning can really help a lot of location based apps to thrive. But Google and Apple have made anyone but their own apps have to choose between being creepy or not.
If you don’t consider the difference in kind between a human vulnerability and an automated vulnerability that derives from the essentially unlimited capacity of the latter to scale, your comment makes a lot of sense. If you do consider that, the argument becomes irrelevant and deeply misleading
This is all moot until activist prosecutors and judges stop coddling criminals and start enforcing the rule of law.
Yeah, an outright assertion of power from the monarch would not go well, but the soft power they wield is still pretty extreme.
I saw some CA employment lawyer [1] on youtube, and something he says a lot on his talks is "Don't call me if your manager is mean or not following some legal requirements, instead, here's how to best document and complain about it so it'll look good for you if they ever retaliate against you. Once they retaliate, then you should call me."

[1] https://www.youtube.com/@braniganrobertsonlaw/
Back in my old network engineering job at MCI, there was a secret Prism project. Rumors claimed it was to optically split the fiber without introducing delay for eavesdropping.

I'm sure naming is related and glad to see the initiative.
We shouldn't have to live like this. We need a Lee Kuan Yew or Bukele type of leader to step up in these cities and say enough. This
passive acceptance of crime and disorder under some misguided sense of compassion or that putting criminals in jail is immoral is pathetic and will lead to ruin. This is not how civilization functions.
> We didn't/don't need a single payment system

I disagree. I did need a single payment system. I am glad I have it. I do not need a single unified fare policy.

I understand that you want different things. Which is fine! But it's frustrating to me that you are trying to negate my complimenting some people who worked hard and made things better just because they didn't also do the things you want. Things, I'm sure, many of them also wanted.
Except it can't be resolved in the judicial arm because the law of Oklahoma explicitly prohibits that from happening.
Weeds have evolved to have their leaves eaten and otherwise destroyed. Many rely on animals eating them to spread their seed.

You need some method to destroy the roots.
The recommender is actually trying to get you to scroll the recommendations for as long as possible, not show you a useful/good video. On mobile they show you an ad every 5 recommendations, which is more ads per minute than if you watch an ad then a long video.
Nice article.

Note that there's more than one 'MySQL FOREIGN KEY' implementation.
MySQL Ndb Cluster also supports foreign keys with some differences wrt the InnoDB implementation :

- NDB, therefore not limited to a single MySQL Server, shard etc
- Not limited to references between tables in a single database
- Supports NoAction deferred constraint checks
- Cascaded changes Binlogged independently as part of RBR
(Nice side effect of reducing replica apply time work)
...

https://dev.mysql.com/blog-archive/foreign-keys-in-mysql-clu...

Some of the issues described wrt DDL limitations are shared.

Many schemas seem to overuse foreign keys perhaps under the assumption that they are required for or accelerate joins?
That weekly show which seemed to mostly consist of dumping journos into extremely sketchy situations was pretty wild

I thought it got cancelled long ago, but apparently it got moved to Showtime?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_(TV_series)
Which is fine, humans will adapt to this info noise rather than going crazy, Hinton is way underestimating human intelligence
Absolutely correct.

People love to pick on authoritarian governments in China or wherever but just look the other way and pretend it isn't true when it happens in Canada or Australia. The US will be in the same place in 10 years.
Even then, your house would be the location you spend most of your time. You'd have to be really vigilant to switch off your cell functions when you go near your house most of the time, and not always at the same place (otherwise a clean gap in the map will reveal where you live).

If you want to be untraceable you don't use cellphones, simple as that. Of course modern life is ridiculously difficult that way so it's pretty impossible.