skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Maybe to communicate with humans in open channels while frustrating automated attempts to analyze your conversation? I’m not sure
I will admit that I don't know much about Bayesian statistics, but how does something producing probability as an output mean it's not reasoning? I'm pretty sure humans do that consciously and subconsciously all the time and we call that reasoning
Shouldn't it be TLDW? (Too Long, Didn't Watch)
I think their N1 rocket was similar and pretty far in development before it was cancelled.
Is absolute pitch something you would actually want? From what I’ve read as people with absolute pitch get into late middle age in many their reference drifts and they start to perceive music that is in tune as being out of tune. For some this makes it hard to continue to enjoy music.

People with relative pitch can learn specific notes well enough to be able to recognize them given the constraint that the note is being played roughly in tune on an instrument tuned to the common tunings of the music they are familiar with, and they can learn to recognize intervals.

This allows them with practice to identify notes almost as fast as someone with absolute pitch, and allows them to do all the practical musical things people with absolute pitch can do.
These are still very 1 dimensional type of intelligence comparatively to super intelligence we fantasize about, I’m confident because I see the probability ASI on current hardware isn’t there. Just look how much we understand our own brains and you think current hardware can best that by just algorithm isn’t a good bet.
> Sure, there have been periods of buggy behavior, but that's always going to happen when the system is changing, and they get resolved reasonably quickly.

I also use web and android, and the periods of buggy behavior have been more frequent, more severe, and taken longer to get resolved (some of them appear to be serious unresolved but intermittent, though maybe they are resolved and re-caused, though in some ways that would be more worrying.)

But, if you’re happy with what you’re getting, good for you.
The altered text output also makes little sense to me, a human.
Revolutionalize ML Training – MosiacML
MosiacML, the latest and greatest training framework to hit the scene, is taking the machine learning world by storm. The code is top-notch, and the multiple optimizations that work right out of the box with HuggingFace models are a game-changer. It's no wonder that so many businesses are hopping on the MosiacML bandwagon - this framework is the real deal.

Personally, I've been loving the MosiacML trainer for training our Bert Models. With the composer library, scaling training is a breeze - no more worrying about OOMs or streaming data from your cloud buckets. For more information, be sure to check out https://www.mosaicml.com/blog/composer-0-12-release.

In the ever-evolving field of machine learning, staying relevant is key. Believe me, I've wasted hours debugging problems with other outdated frameworks. So if you want to stay ahead of the curve and produce top-notch models, MosiacML is the way to go.
It's very bold of you to assume that my kitchen has ventilation at all. There's an electric extractor fan that just blows the air back in your face. I've seen other people's place where they don't even have that charade.

I'd love to have a real setup. Unfortunately I've not been given that option and it is the same for many others.
The problems with Rails are the same as with Ruby as it was with Smalltalk: just too easy to make a mess (the nature of dynamic languages), and its community suffers from a nasty case of groupthink.

Notice the cliche "Rails is so much more than a framework."

The same magic that makes one so productive at the beginning (start-up stage) is what comes back to bite you in the ass when the project grows into an actual product; unless you are careful and willing to trade off speed-to-market, which isn't what you want to do with a startup.

Catch-22 because the app has gone off the rails by the time you are successful, and everyone says: "Oh, you shouldn't have done that."
Countries will obviously start taking risks with uncertainties when it becomes certain that they risk destruction due to rising heat.
I am soo happy for you guys. Being in a long distance 5 year relationship myself this is pretty awesome. I'm gonna give this one a shot
The biggest challenge for android IMO is Apple's Messages. It's clearly a degraded experience having an android user in the GC that some people will create a second GC without the android user in it.
Exactly as you describe. Agonizing but it sounds insane to people so you can’t say anything. I excuse myself from social situations more than once a week.
new-word stink? check

meaning everything and the contrary of it? check

new? No, seemingly it is around since many years, very likely "invented" by Merrill Swain:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrill_Swain

https://hbepbmt.wordpress.com/reading-reflection-week-6-defi...

cannot say in which of her many papers it was used first.
This seems worthwhile at first sight; another implementation (in a different language) gives us more choice and time will tell on the CVE count:user ratio.
Well, as was said, you could just pay more for the service that includes a routable IP address.
Universities often benefit from it financially. There almost always is an agreement between the professor and the university.
I’ve been using this one

https://pypi.org/project/netcalc/
Then there's the question of how the electric grid will sustain this significant new increase in demand. As with mandates banning gas cars, the grid supply and stability is always regarded as a mere detail to be sorted out later.
The poor property developers?

Edit: why would one assume that it isnt going to be taken out of their profit margins?
Right, like I said... on the spectrum... neither art nor beyond the apex of science as cult.

FWIW, Bon Appetit may not be clear on sandwich engineering, but it is clear on sandwich architecture:

https://www.bonappetit.com/columns/the-foodist/article/sandw...

I can certainly remember chefs in my city who met that standard.
Great question, and I'll let someone with deeper technical understanding answer this, but using Wikipedia as a reference (1), it looks like "fediverse" is a bit loosely defined, with parts of it not being fully compatible with all of the other networks (2).

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fediverse
2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_software_and_pro...
How does one "practice" perfect pitch? (genuinely asking so I can try it, not trying to make some dumb rhetorical point about it not being possible)
How AirTags Turned into Spies
> Taking a peak at my usual interface stack includes commands, components, decorators, forms, inputs, queries, presenters, serializers, and services. This is in addition to the default controllers, helpers, mailers, models, views.

Would love to hear a short bit on what each of these does in your Rails codebases! I'm familiar with decorators, queries, presenters, serializers, services, but commands, components, forms, and inputs are new to me. Would be great to see what I'm missing out on.
Considering it's already convinced "AI experts"...
The warning is added back here: https://github.com/sudo-project/sudo/commit/9757d29a24ac1872...
Such a project will take care of our citizens. Maybe not "first" because technically it takes care of ALL people first, and therefore no one is "second." The US gov would be in a unique position to do it owing of course to the pool of talent and resources it can draw from. I don't have a clue where you live, but I live in the Mountain West and the water wars are constant issue on peoples minds. Not to mention, changing climate will induce immigration. Where do you think people will immigrate if they can? If your argument is about "American's first" with falling birthrates and neoliberal supremacy and whatnot, you're going to have a whole lot of new neighbors if their climate gets worse, because America first.
It’s not “nature”. It’s “man”. Man can be fought.
Why not create a new program with a different name instead of rewriting it? It's a new program at that point anyway.

Edit: seems the article confused me with the word rewriting when the source homepage and repository says reimplemention, which makes more sense.
Slack is a product owned by a company. If you don't like it, don't use it. Trying to get Salesforce to implement a change to their product via activism is laughable.
As far as I know there is a similar but probably not exactly the same, "super sellers" - perfume companies hire those with the skill to be their perfumers or "noses".
What makes humans unique are 10,000 missing bits of DNA
Thousands of newsfeeds sounds like a quantity problem in itself. Even at one post per feed per day doesn't that take up an inordinate amount of your time?
Flavour is highly influenced by color. Tasting happens in the brain.
Replacing fossil fuels with alternative energy and nuclear power. If US spent even a fraction of the resources on that instead of maintaining its global military empire, the world would be in a far better place today.
News coverage is strongly biased towards new things, thus the name.

Continuing conflict isn't new, especially if it's not local. Warzones are dangerous, and if none of the sides is interested in protecting reporters, and no side has an affiliated and large contigent of independent risk-taking reporters, there's just not going to be much coverage. If just being an independent reporter is a large risk, also getting close to combat is less likely.
generally, you review when you have a really bad experience.
Only €1.58 a kilo here in the Netherlands.

https://www.ah.nl/producten/product/wi48405/ah-volkoren-have...
He does qualify it with "humanities". In my experience, this is not true in engineering. I went to a low ranked undergrad and got into a top 3 ranked school for grad (with no research). As did many of my peers.
I came across a story (which Google, alas, was unable to locate) how Faulkner supposedly didn’t keep a dictionary at home. And so whenever he had to look something up, he’d take a walk down to the drugstore in town, which luckily kept a dictionary on hand for him to use. The writer suggested this may explain Faulkner’s occasionally idiosyncratic use of some words—usage that, while at times may have been incorrect, coming as it does from a Nobel laureate, nevertheless altered the dictionaries he didn’t have.
You said "The U.S. is currently in the midst of a huge STD epidemic". It is not. Historic low rates of STDs correlate with the elimination of the norms you're advocating.
But you are the one I guess.
Then they should regulate health with performance specifications on vent hoods and banning new 80% furnaces. This is just performative governance without doing meaningful work.
Related:

Show HN: You-tldr-Summarize and Interact with YouTube Videos in your language - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35280312 - March 2023 (2 comments)

Show HN: You-tldr – easy-to-read transcripts of Youtube videos - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26048946 - Feb 2021 (72 comments)
I need this, but for Vimeo videos.
This is correct, and was added back a few weeks later in https://github.com/sudo-project/sudo/commit/9757d29a24ac1872...
My flatmate used to watch TV in the living room quite loud when I was trying to sleep in my room.

I set a Raspberry Pi with an IR led running an Apache server close to the TV. From my phone I would visit the Raspberry IP and send signals to the IR led to lower the volume.
It's to fool you to believe it's worth a click. Fooled me too tbh.
I am well aware what it means, and I used 1-shot for the same reason we humans say I gave it "a shot", meaning attempt.

LLMs get the right answer and do so faster than humans. The only real limitation here is the back and forth because of the chat interface and implementation. Ultimately, it all boils down to giving prompts that achieve the same thing as shown in the paper.

Furthermore, this is a weird boundary/goal-post humans get stuff wrong all the time, and we created tools to make our lives easier, if we let LLMs use tools, they do even better.
Even in music it is not that helpful to be honest. Eg. most live shows you tune the instruments to the piano. If the piano is slightly out of tune, someone with perfect pitch will be annoyed the entire time trying to deal with that while everyone else hears a perfectly good concert.

having good relative pitch is way more useful.

Many musicians with perfect pitch have also been really obsessed with tuning in their recordings and it sets off a lot of anxiety for them cause they can hear themselves the smallest amount off, when no one else can and the performance makes it a perfect take to use in the song.

It can be helpful I guess for composing, but as someone who does composing, it's not hard to just tinker with a piano to get the notes I want, no need to be able to perfectly hum them when I think of them.
This is a remarkably facile discussion of an interesting relationship, and I was hoping for more substance than what's here. The conclusion feels like something I might have done in more than one 100-level American Lit midterm essay.
ok, but people are still overheating due to to the increased heat in the summer. Maybe now only 100million more people risk heatstroke and 200million less risk freezing to death in the winter, that doesn’t mean there’s a very very big problem
Oops. But too late to delete the comment now...

By the way, it got 7 upvotes despite being factually incorrect.
Funny if you live in a free country

Potentially terrifying if you don't
That's completely fair, it's definitely just opinion as to what to include. Getting to lunar orbit can reasonably be considered a separate challenge to landing, so it might make sense to separate them.

In that case though, I think Apollo 10 should at least be mentioned in some capacity, as it was a dress rehearsal that came within 16km of the lunar surface, and tested much of the lander's systems. Not listed as a failure or success, just mentioned, as it's a very relevant test.
Lots of apps will still show a black screen via scrcpy:

* The lock screen of the device

* AndOTP

* Bromite Incognito mode.

I think its called a "security screen" which prevents this, or something like that.
Or JPM coldly calculates that, after this all shakes out, they will account for 30% of the banking sector, and burning $30b now is better than burning >$100b later.

FDIC rescues are paid for by (essentially) a levy on the banks.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externality
Why not properly educate the population on why electric stoves should be preferred over alternative stoves?

Why not incentivize buyers to buy electric stoves (e.g., tax credits) or incentivize OEMs to lower the cost of electric stoves?

As someone who’s house is intentionally and entirely designed around the premise that we lose mains power on a routine basis due to poor infrastructure and challenging environment (a mountain with dense forest), and wish to have a means for cooking food indoors without electricity, I have a propane stove. It is the only viable option as far as I am concerned, and as such, I am willing to pay a premium for one if I need to replace the unit I have. But if I can’t get a replacement propane stove in the future, what am I supposed to do? Overhaul my house at my own expense? Pay the electric company the multiple millions of dollars it would take to modernize their infrastructure to make an electric stove a viable option?

Shifting that much burden onto someone like me is absurd, as is this ban. There are numerous other ways to address the problem that the ban aims to solve.

Bans are rarely—if ever—good solutions, and should only ever be used as a measure of last resort. The situation at hand is far from one of last resort. But apparently the US is fully mired in the unfortunate “bans are the best way to score political points” phase of its history… one that I think we’d all be best served to put behind us quickly.
Is that obvious? The proposed method has the possible side effect of ozone depletion. Increasing UV creates a whole new set of problems.
Or by lobbyists, willing to provide a steak dinner and whisky with their education.
>It's not where the money is.

No and certainly not on a risk-adjusted basis. (i.e. if you're reasonably competent, you're far more likely to do pretty well in private business than academia). On the other hand, while I've never had personal exposure to the downsides, a tenured position at an elite university in the US still seems pretty attractive with various caveats in both directions depending upon the location.
Lol I hate myself! But I’m sure the doc will be more interesting to you than my teacher’s 1920s kindergarten tales. I found her fascinating though.
Hmm you should've only needed a 3 ton unit for that amount of square footage and those cost about 2-5k. Was there some other kind of work that needed to be done that you aren't mentioning? You should've seen prices around 8k for the unit plus installation.
My experience with doctors in a patient setting is that they have generally been far less empathetic than the doctors in /r/AskDocs. Those doctors seem to be motivated to help and actually show some empathy. While Reddit on the whole is snarky, many subreddits (especially heavily moderated ones like AskDocs and AskHistorians) have a completely different tone.

My experience with most doctors is that they are among the least empathic people I have ever dealt with. I think that using AskDocs actually gives doctors an unrealistic _advantage_ in the study.
This part of the world needs something cheap and low tech. No one who is at risk has the money for cutting edge building materials.

Mirrors on every roof? Polished steel? Brick or concrete walls? At a city level, low tech could still make a difference.
These are really good solid ideas that would also have a lot of popular support.

Basically take all the loopholes that the .01% use and close or disadvantage them so they don't use them (or as much).

Rich still get richer but the system stabilizes.
Cool, thanks. I will pass this along to some people who might be able to help.
The first time I saw this message I was on my own danged system and I was still momentarily alarmed, hahaha. Common sense asserted itself pretty quickly of course.
I find the same for my projects.

I usually get them just far enough to work well, but the time commitment ends up becoming a grind for the more advanced features that are just out of my memory wheelhouse.

I recently figured I was stuck with an Elasticsearch feature since I didn’t know what to google. ChatGPT got it working in 3-4 prompts with me feeding error messages to it.

So I’m finding that I’m not only faster, but have new skills and can make features that were impossible before due to time commitment/ grind limitations.
I've been in the IT racket for over 30 years, so maybe I have an unfair advantage in terms of candidates.

I helped rewrite FIS (RSTS) as XENTIS (VMS) for Park Software in the early 1980s and worked on it for over a decade. It lasted as long as VMS did. This was the prototypical "report writer" / wizard.

I wrote a logistics system for a nonprofit on donated VAX hardware. That lasted a decade before Y2K doomed their accounting system (VAX don't care about no steenkin' Y2K!) and both were replaced together.

I wrote a procmail guide (documentation) and a web page with a javascript-based .procmailrc wizard that rattled around the internet for a while.

I've got various pieces of automation which have been ported to different systems for as long as two decades (I don't think I have anything currently running which is older than that).

I invite you to view the repos I have pinned at GitHub: https://github.com/m3047/ although none is older than 2019.

I seem to be building a command-line based federated SIEM leveraging DNS and Redis. At this point I don't know if it will ever see the light of day in terms of wider availability, haven't found anyone else who's onboard with this level of sedition (yet).

I've built other software which was popular for a short while.

I'll offer an honorable mention for http://twiki.org/ as I used to curate a distribution. I'm still personally running the version based on the Dakar release from 2006. I've patched a couple of security issues and made some small changes due to changes in Perl in that time.

So what makes code last?

It's not a beauty contest. It solves a problem, but you can solve the problem without it. It doesn't sit astride a shear layer. It inspires confidence in terms of predictability. It offers useful internal telemetry or other mechanisms which allow that confidence to be tested, explored, or extended. Oftentimes it doesn't solve THE problem, but is composable to solve various problems. It doesn't chase trends (XENTIS pretty much filled out out every useful feature we could think of in its niche, but it stayed in that niche). It might be personal bias, but configuration is declarative or at least machine parseable and accessible (so you can compare configs over the last decade or more).
a lot of this blog post is about how universities come up with a long list of titles to avoid calling adjuncts "adjuncts". so you could ask this question, and the admissions officer would (somewhat) honestly answer that they don't have any adjuncts. then you would go and have most of your classes taught by people who are adjuncts in every way except their title. a better question might be "what percentage of faculty are tenure track?" or "what percentage of courses are taught by tenure track faculty?".

that said, I don't see much evidence that the "teacher-scholar" model brings a lot of value to undergraduate education in the first place. even in a fast-moving field like CS, the vast majority of the BS curriculum is stuff that was figured out decades ago. by far the best "professor" I had in my CS degree was actually an MS student TA who really liked operating systems. technically, he wasn't even allowed to teach that class, but I guess the department looked the other way because he got great reviews and they didn't have to pay him much.
If Shell is spending billions on people to talk about climate full time negatively, it seems a rather obvious oversight that they wouldn't include instructions to not advertise that fact. But I wasn't talking about an army of paid human shills. The majority of the "discourse" around COVID misinformation came from 12 sources - not everyone who repeated their talking points was paid to do so, yet shaped the discourse was.

Governments spending billions on "climate change related stuff", an existential threat to their continued existence, is not the conspiracy you think it is.

(...And by the same token, Shell spending billions protecting its continued existence/economic model would also not be some conspiracy...)
The people who buy and rent properties. They ultimately pay the price for artificially increased material/labor costs.
Reddit is radical left leaning, they do not like Musk and hive-mind believed that "Twitter was collapsing", yet, after gazillions were fired, nothing happened.

Goes to show you that one should never let brain mix what one wants to happen with what is actually happening.
Walk me through how knowing that people also die of cold exposure violates the narrative that there is a deadly heat wave threatening 1B people in India? Is this something logically consistent or a non-sequitor?
We already know what will happen:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064177
Kind of, your eyes are doing automatic white balance.
I use a lot of automated filtering against it. I read for maybe an hour per day, just like someone would read a newspaper. I haven't seen live broadcast TV since 2010, so it's not like I spend my life consuming content or anything like that.

The overwhelming majority of them don't even publish every month, let alone every quarter. They're also categorized and prioritized. E.g., a vuln in a piece of software I or a client uses is going to be weighted differently to say a recipe from my wife's blog.