skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This could be interpreted as saying unless you fix everything at once, any incremental change should be seen as disingenuous and merely a distraction. Would you like to rephrase?
> But when you dig into the details, it seems like the regulation may not have much effect on climate change at all.

[Citation needed]
Certainly not a substitute, but come on, no need at all? We have food handling safety laws and restaurant inspectors, so there’s no need to review restaurants?
Gas stoves and plastic straws are distractions, they don't matter either way.
It's important to realize the vast majority of people will not get to that certain point. Sure, you may not want to be as large as some of the famous body builders, but don't worry! That takes living your entire life organized around the central goal of getting bigger. If you are going to the gym for an hour 3 days a week you will never get to that point.
Housing is not a human right. Do you have a right to force me to build you a house? Think about it. Why would we have any nice housing at all in that situation? Why would anyone build it?

These silly things like "x is a human right" miss the point. At some point people have to take responsibility.
There are genuinely bad tenants. There are genuinely bad landlords. The system does a poor job of filtering the two. If the system worked well, good participants from either group would have little to fear from doing business with a bad actor on the other side. The system we have-and that you described well-forces a policy choice between favoring landlords (including the bad ones) or favoring tenants (including the bad ones). It is not a fair and free market.
valgrind is too slow for day-to-day use.
I only use it when I have something specific in mind.

I guess would be acceptible in CI pipeline too, but never tried.
Calorie restriction sounds more fun than lifting weights?

That's a new one for me.

Have you actually tried a routine or are you just guessing that lifting is painful or awful or something? IME it's quite relaxing as long as you're not ego lifting (going beyond your current capabilities).
As a math professor, I had an epiphany about the word "easily" several years ago. In my course notes, I used that word to mean "I guarantee you don't need any additional ideas here, just do the obvious thing." Nothing more was meant.

But I realized that many students either didn't think the obvious thing was really that obvious, or maybe realized it but were reticent to follow that path because it invoved some tedious work and the prof said it was easy, so that couldn't be it.

Many students were also intimidated by that word, as if I were saying to them "if you don't find this easy, you shouldn't be here".

So I went on a deleting spree, removing most instances of "easy", "simple", and "just a matter of", and replacing them with a clearer explanation of what to do. My notes got better as a result. Less filler, less intimidation, more useful details.
GFCI was already made mandatory in all kitchens nationally. The 2023 code updates expanded and strengthened the requirements here
Generally not the big ones. They are big enough to have a local branch office that can fined if caught. Small and medium sized companies are much harder to fine as they just don't operate in your country.

When the big ones do they are very careful about it, so they can claim to be in a grey area. Tire companies know there is child labor, but they are buying from the parents, and they make sure outside of harvest those kids get a great education (when the kids grow up their either leave, or work the plantation as medical or management staff and not labor). You can still say they are in the wrong, but they have made a place where you can understand the grey
I can give you a great example of the positive aspect of speculation.

Look at the futures market. Speculators are a big part of the liquidity of the futures market.

Price of wheat is $60/bushel. Farmer won't harvest for another 6 months and is worried prices will drop. They can secure a future and lock in the price now.

Wheat purchasers aren't on the other side of that trade, because why would they lock in a higher price? A lower price benefits them.

Speculators come in and bet on the price of wheat, creating a deep pool of futures that can be bought and sold.
I see “blocklist” becoming more popular in programming. But it just occurred to me how bizarre and out of place it would be if the parent comment said “a blocklisted word”.
> Up the corporate tax rate.

> Change marginal tax rates for individuals.

Politician? Why are you trying to hide your intent here. Raise taxes across the board, just say it.
He spent it on gorging himself on fried chicken delivery and electronics he piles around his horde room. His parents have to manage him to keep him from suicide. It's not a funny situation.
Government picked fossil fuels and the winner for decades. The subsidies, infrastructure and regulations favorable to selling fossil gas and fossil auto fuels (and heating oil) was structurally important to government earlier.

Now it’s less important than saving money and improving the electric grid.
no because we obviously can’t keep up with the infrastructure, we need to gradually remove it and stop adding more
I'm not sure we watched the same video. In the video I watched, the host explained how it was possible for this to happen entirely with default settings.
How do you not pay taxes on property?
I was in the same situation and had to get SOC 2 and ISO27001 to keep a juicy account. My suggestion would be "absolutely not until you absolutely must".

It's a bottomless pit of time and money. All those "automation tools" (e.g., Drata/Vanta) help with 10-20% of the overall workload, and for me, took as many hours to set up as they saved. For ISO27001, your final annual cost will be $20-40k and will eat up 2-4 weeks per year. Implementing and maintaining a compliance program will do nothing to help you discover/solve customer problems or improve your security posture. Doing this work is the equivalent of "I want to do a startup, so I'm learning how to do business registration, taxation, comply with employment laws, and design business cards".

Compliance will waste your already constrained resources, energy, and focus. It will slow you down and has such a negative ROI that you must have significant deals at risk to consider imposing this ongoing tax on your operations. In other words, wait until you're forced to by your customers/prospects.
Real estate you rent out is probably the prime example of Capital, and many who own real estate (without a mortgage on it) certainly aren't working class.

I didn't find a great source on this, but the average landlord in the US seems to own 3 properties. [1]

[1]: https://www.mysmartmove.com/SmartMove/blog/todays-landlord-c...
Report describes Apple’s “organizational dysfunction”, “lack of ambition” in AI
FIDE world chess championship decided in rapid tiebreaks
An inverse example would be any bubble, for example the housing bubble that happened over a decade ago. Prediction of house prices going up eventually reached a point where house prices were going up, despite low "actual demand" (of course, if you count "demand for investment", then prices are absolutely a measure of that).
When you hire new people and they encounter this over and over again, onboarding drags on so, so much longer than it should, because people taking your position never think "we should reduce how complex this is", they think "they should stop being babies", and things just get progressively more obtuse and annoying and require more and more tribal knowledge instead of making sense.

It's not the word "simply", it's that if you think every thing that's easy for you is therefore easy, you're communicating that you don't think that understanding other people's experience matters.
Yeah I just wanted my money back and to move on, not get involved with the courts.
This is an interesting example. The wiki said he was worth $200B at his death, while his boat cost $200M when built. When he died it sold for 230M. So in a sense it was an asset, in that it did not depreciate (ignoring inflation). Though I’m sure it cost a lot to operate and maintain.

So he spent 0.1% of his wealth on this! Pretty reasonable budget to spend on something you enjoy IMHO.

He also put it to use on some exploratory missions, rescue mission etc.
I have two different ones in the system right now (around 14 cameras total). Amcrest and SV3C are the brands and both are available on Amazon pretty cheap. I have a mix of 5MP and 4k cameras where it makes sense for better details etc. I also have a mix of the bullet cameras and the bowl versions.

I am pretty sure the SV3C brand is just a rebranded Dahua or similar, just a little different software.

FWIW: I also never use their mobile app to set them up, I just plug them into the isolated network and use the web interface to configure them.
> I think the thought process behind "supporting one unified platform-independent bytecode would be easier than compiling a .so that works with all GNU libc versions" is straightforward and self-evident. Do you disagree?

1. it doesn't really matter what I think

2. Compiling a .so that works with all glibc versions is almost certainly an order of magnitude easier than providing a unified wasm implementation that works on (at least) 3 platforms.
Yes, it’s possible to alter the meaning of something by quoting a sentence out of context.

If you continue reading to the next sentence, it becomes explicitly clear that he is addressing the comments here.
Programmers usually have documented acceptance criteria to meet, and those criteria are usually not up to them.

Poor analogy.
I had a ge one loved it when it worked. The board died twice in 6 months.

The Bosch one probably would have worked fine but for whatever reason it wasn't the look the spouse wanted.

Even though I was fully onboard I could see the specific pan thing annoying some dedicated gas people.

I’m back to gas and no longer have people boiling water so I can boil water.
How do you effectively mandate that those building owners are maintaining their gas lines and ensuring they aren't leaking?

This is where it stops being "personal responsibility"

Also you personally can still have gas anyway, you just don't get government subsidized gas infrastructure anymore. Go get your own propane tank or whatever. Go be "personally independent"
There are several projects to electrostatically repel charged dust from surfaces.

My search foo is failing but one of the space youtubers got a live demo in a lab where some dust was applied to a treated material and then a current was applied: the dust flew off instantly.
You're definitely right that the news loves to write headlines after any daily price fluctuations and pretend they know the reason, when in reality it usually explains nothing and becomes irrelevant by tomorrow.
Ha! I'm on PEI but nice to see info about it.

There is also https://myoldapartment.org/ to see what the last tenant paid for their rent.

PEI seems to be a terrible place to live now. A small population with 50% of the population in one small area. Surge of newcomers. The scourge Airbnb STRs. Buildings going up daily but nowhere to live. Lots of slum landlords in slum buildings. Historical properties as apartment buildings but renovating has to be done historically accurately so no landlord does anything. Rent jumping by 10% or even 95% for one place (a rush beofre the new regs). Controls and new regulations only now implemented after the party in power dragged its feet.
> if that stops the whole market around that will collapse.

What does that look like, and for how long?
Gas won your business and government picked gas as the winner. Government didn’t run a gas line to my home.
That’s within the context of my comment.

Also, extremely unlikely. But they’ll be better served by the mentality that they can than worrying about a victim narrative about how they’ll never be able to succeed.

Eg, this.

https://www.clickorlando.com/news/local/2021/10/12/after-bec...
Spoken like somebody who has never rented out property, risked $$$$ on building something, or doing anything with a business. Please read up on how real estate businesses work.
"papercuts" is a very poor metaphor for this. In the real world, a cut from an edge of a sheet of paper is surprisingly painful (and sometimes briefly a little scary that something so innocuous can cause such injury and pain!), but the body heals the cut in 24 hours or so with no conscious effort. In the software world, one will keep bumping into the defect while remains, and there is no guarantee that it will ever be corrected.
...maybe? Why would fragility be a less likely explanation? I promise, I'm thinking as hard as I can but maybe I'm too dumb.
I'm going to violate one of my Prime Directives about posting on Musk threads, but there's just no way they'll repair that pad in two months.

Even if Musk was a Stalin-esque Maximum Leader, it couldn't happen. That's not even considering the other regulatory hurdles you might encounter when your planned building expels apartment-sized chunks of concrete at 83 m/s.

Of course, regulatory is . . not the primary problem, even if you're of the persuasion that things like safety and the environment don't matter. Some chunks rebounded and almost certainly hit that rocket. Even without "lotto ball concrete debris", Dougherty et al figured out in 1984 that high impulse continuous shock would reflect, resonate, and shake a rocket to bits. It's research related to the "water deluge" system; arguably, the Soviets came to the same conclusion with Energia, based on the N1 work from the decade prior. Minimum safety distance, that's to protect infrastructure that takes a long ass time to put back, and the V2 rocketmen started paying pretty close attention to that even for their suborbital shots.

I guess I'm not too sure what got learned here, aside from the fact that Raptor is a pretty great engine, still burning at all after that abuse.

Also, Saturn V's S-1C had 13 launches and 13 orbits . . fifty years ago. Why is that? Well, there's lots of reasons, and one of them is the cost of labor. Those big F-1 engines were essentially hand-fitted pieces of welding art, but, counterpoint, computing and other tech would MORE than make up for a surfeit of cheap master welders[1]. Leadership from capital is another. I'm not going to say anything negative about anybody, but let's take a look at one of the maximum leaders from the era: Thornton Wilson. Born on a Missouri dirt farm, ISU BS Aero Engineering, CIT MS in same, NAS award winner, as undergrad he worked on B-47 and B-52, and then kept on working aerospace UNTIL HE DIED. In 1969, the buck stopped with this guy. This is who capital put in charge of the big booster back in the day. How does capital do leadership now?

[1] You would think, right? Maybe these computer things aren't actually all that useful, but I don't believe that. More likely, computing has a whole bunch of secondary effects on organizational health that are really, really, really bad, which partly offset the amazing gains.
What do you think class is?

Class is determined by one's role in society.

Working people are working class, and Donald Trump is not one of them.

Owning people are "owning class" also called "bourgeoise" and Donald Trump is one of them.

"Lower class" and "upper class" are nonsense Americanisms.
> I can’t believe that actual people are that invested in burning hydrocarbons.

Yeah, it's weird, right? Why _are_ people so invested in burning natgas and coal and other hydrocarbons for large-scale power generation when a plethora of proven near-zero-emissions alternatives exist?

From a climate-change perspective, banning natgas cookstoves is a few pennies saved on like a thousand dollar expenditure. It's similar to the performative "charging for plastic takeaway bags" and "not bringing out table water" nonsense that California likes to do from time to time... it's way easier than making a real dent in the underlying problem, it inconveniences a ton of people (so they know you're doing something), and because "something" has been done, enough of those people don't bother finding out about and loudly and continually agitating for making a real dent in the underlying problem.
> 90% of places would be grand-fathered in. A landlord won't spend money on fixing the heat...

But we are talking about new construction here like the title says, no?
Now multiply that by the efficiency of a gas power plant.

I'm so glad I swapped out my heat pump for gas heat. My power bill went down and the house is much more comfortable.
Because the ability to veto is a separate step in the workflow, not a precondition of how the vote to pass breaks down. If the hypothetical 100% of the legislature voted yes, the governor could still say no, and then it is upon the legislature to formally override with another vote.
Maybe they actually meant it only got 1/10 better.
Anyone that has ever used Siri in comparison to other assistants knows this haha.
Why U.S. vacation policies are so much worse than Europe's
The pundit's claims are part of the speculation. If you speculated that the pundit's words would matter, you'd short or sell out grain, making the pundit's words matter. Supply and demand are only sometimes good measures of people actually using or producing these products (and when they fail bubbles occur), but are always good measures of the spending of both people actually using the product, and the investors buying it in wanting to sell it.

In any case, as the investors buy the product they eventually have to sell it, meaning over the long run demand and supply are good measures of "actual" usage and production. You know this because there's never a bubble that doesn't collapse and return to equilibrium.
Why would that be a reasonable assumption?
Many users are angry they have to pay for video games so make them all free.
If those batteries are too old/weak to effectively power a car how useful are they going to be at powering a household stove?

Especially when why would you need such a thing anyway when you have 220v+ just itching to get the job done directly from the grid? The grid needs power storage, yes, but there's all sorts of solutions to that beyond lithium ion batteries including water & stone gravity storage systems. Or just centralized batteries.
Cool I am glad there are more people using it in production these days, it will help the language become more stable. I've deployed Julia to production a few times now. In almost every case it was rewritten in another language within a year for one reason or another... This is sad, but, for being a v1 language, it never lost it's "early adopter" experience for myself or my colleagues.

I've seen minor releases in Julia break essential packages. Not like it was one time either. So where did I get the idea, personal hands on experience.

Again it's great if you have a script and want to run it, anything beyond that, in my experience, results in a lot of turmoil and erosion. Almost wonder if it's a flaw in the language itself or, the maintenance model of the packages. Oh well not my problem
You've got me thinking, as far as cooperation, nobodies gonna compare to ants, but is there a species of mammal that can work in as large as groups as we can? Some avian flocks and mammal herds get pretty big, but I'm only aware of them cooperating in transit, do they do collaborative child rearing and food sharing like we do?
In my early years as a musician I focused too much on theory.

I didn’t really start to grow until I started to learn as many covers as I could and how to improvise a solo over the changes.

The theory part helps only in that I know how a dim7 chord looks, sounds and feels but most importantly how it is used by composers.

That being said, Mark Levine’s Jazz Theory book is excellent. And get a copy of a Real Book and watch YouTube videos on the voicings used by players and you’ll expand your harmonic palette immensely!
HN audience, despite being overrepresented by Americans, is a global board, and the rest of the world iOS vs. Android is 50/50 (boy do we need to break up this duopoly though).
The parent is talking about having no vent hood.
> Now the fanboys will come crying.

Why would the fanboys cry?

Starlink is at a low enough altitude that it's largely insulated from Kessler syndrome. Even if the satellites fail, they'll deorbit in 5-10 years; that doesn't sound like a short time, but space is very, very big; it generally takes a long time for collisions to happen by chance. That's fast enough that there is very little debris at that height.

The real danger comes from constellations like OneWeb or Telesat Lightspeed (planned) where the orbital altitude is so high that failed satellites (one has already happened for OneWeb) will remain in orbit functionally forever.
As a heavy nixpkgs user your comment resonates and makes me nervous.

I was thinking if it is possible in nixpkgs to create a branch that attempts to create a version match to specific distributions, especially Ubuntu as the ML world is most using it. My idea is to somehow use the deb package information to “shadow” another distribution.

> First because Python isn't compiled with optimizations and LTO in nixpkgs by default, because it is not reproducible. So, you override the Python derivation to enable optimizations and LTO. Python builds fine, but to get the machine learning ecosystem on you machine, Nix needs to build a gazillion Python packages, since the derivation hash of Python changed. Turns out that many derivations don't actually build. They build with the little amount of parallelism available on Hydra builders, but many Python packages will fail to build because of concurrency issues in tests that do manifest on your nice 16 core machine.

I understand your comments including above and the one about CUDA binaries. Just one clarification on the concurrency in tests failure, do you mean it overloads the machine running multi process tests that then tests fail due to assumptions by the package authors?

My main point is that Nix as a system is so incredibly powerful that perhaps there is an ability to “shadow” boring distributions, especially debian based, in some automated way. The we would have the best of both, baseline stability from the distribution and extensibility of nix.
Roadster, Dojo (this one I remember actually believing he sounded so sure it was a done deal years ago), Semi. 10x is generous given his history , can't believe how many people still find him credible
Gas stoves matter as far as indoor air quality and giving people asthma/allergies goes.
In GNU make, you can use Target-specific Variable Values (https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Target_00...)

You can also do

DEBUG ?= 1
ifeq ($(DEBUG), 1)
CFLAGS =<whatever you want>
else
CFLAGS=<whatever you want>
endif

and then build with

make DEBUG=0

for the release build.

In BSD make, you can use something like

.ifmake target
CFLAGS := <whatever you want>
.else
CFLAGS := <whatever you want>
.endif
Portable induction stoves were used in a few kitchens I've worked in, but as a supplementary tool, e.g., the pastry guy needs to make jam while the line is really busy.

The main thing that makes electric stoves hard for a professional kitchen is ultimately speed and space. You need every single burner during a rush, and you need to be reacting quick, and there is usually very limited space. If I need to stop the heat on my pan, I need to stop it now. An electric top requires you to actually move the pan off the burner to somewhere else, but good luck finding a spot without butting in on the garde manger or grill guy. A gas stove offers the flexibility of being able to leave food there until its ready to plate.
In Barcelona (and I think all of Spain), your 1-month deposit is kept by the state and is automatically returned to you unless the landlord can prove that you did something that entitles them to it.
"One more step
Please complete the security check to access archive.ph"

What utter shit.
They've become too comfortable with their devices's insane profit margins.