skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
But most importantly are proud in unity of the big and independent Empire that is so influential in most of the UK. Or British Isles minus Ireland. Or Great Britain without some folks in Scotland. Or Englad + Wales. Difficult to follow what is what and where and why and who. Nevertheless, this amount of pride mandates a Brexit. Or maybe even two.
The conversation is more natural and intelligent. Better than ChatGPT. I am impressed.
In defense of Grafana Loki, it's awesome... if you have a lot of information about your telemetry data up front - i.e volumes, use cases, how you wish to query it etc.

A broader solution like Coralogix (https://coralogix.com/) is more appropriate if you're venturing into the unknown and you need more of a data discovery capability. The problem with most of THESE "all in one" platforms is they tried flexibility and feature breadth for cost. Coralogix is a wee bit different, and it gives users an awesome set of cost optimization tools, as well as a simple pricing model, to offer data discovery without a sudden increase in costs (or worse, surprise overages!).
cough ... so cannabis and opium are not drugs now. Don't fall for propaganda friend.
You can train the model on more training data after it has been released.
Not really.

The challenging part is connecting to the cellular network, and you'd still need a separate module for that. In the end you'd end up with what is essentially a dongle connected to the RPI[0], so you don't really gain anything from it.

[0]: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/raspberry-pi-5g-hat
Love the minimalistic approach. May I ask what library have you used for chart?
All of them were sorted during WFH. I moved out to remote places and paid far less. I saved quite a bit on all of the above remote other than Internet of course. The economy is setup to extract your money from you once you've earned it.
I program MCUs in C++ as a hobby, and I'm not sure how I would do this in C++. Idiomatically I believe you could use move semantics to invalidate a "handle" to a pin when switching its type, but that wouldn't fail at compile-time. With ownership you really have something in your execution that "is" the pin by virtue of only one value of that pin existing at a time.

See also https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSt2VB1zQAJ6JDMa... for the general case.
PEP 713 – Callable Modules – peps.python.org
>I think ChatGPT is good evidence of this. What evidence do we have that this isn't how intelligence works?

People don't need the gigantic amount of input data that ChatGPT needs to learn. However I'm not sure what exactly "this" is you and GP are referring to, and it may be possible to improve existing ideas so that it works with less input data.
On Virtuosity
Sadly, licensing.
I'm not sure how much I'd read into that. Maybe some Disney execs have seller's remorse (or never wanted to sell in the first place). But, at the end of the day, a lot of the "IP" is pretty much public in considerable detail. (That said, having some explicit ownership is a good way to avoid unnecessary haggling with lawyers.) And if Disney had actually wanted the full analytic and writing ability of FiveThirtyEight surely even an entertainment exec would realize you're giving that up if you let those people go.
Knowledge base is a collection of data that describes the knowledge and the relationships between entities. It is the most important information resource for businesses, organizations, and individuals.
For most Brits, at least by my estimation, have fairly complicated feelings towards the Monarchy that often cannot really be expressed. Many Brits aren't monarchists but 'Elizabethans', but now that the Queen has passed, those complicated feelings that were kept at bay by the public's genuine affection for the Queen are now rearing their head. The King, and I suppose the Royal Family in general, aren't doing themselves any favours either. That being said, we aren't shown really any examples of good republicanism.

We know that a Monarchy is weird, that this is the 21st century, that a birthright to rule is medieval... but what's the alternative? No really, what's the alternative? We look at America with its independent, co-equal executive in horror. We don't want that. And then we look at France, whose President just forced through a rise in the retirement age against the will of the Parliament. We don't want that either. Having an elected President inherently means that they'll have a democratic mandate, so there'll always be questions of whether they should be granted more power, or whether the President has the mandate to exercise power. There's great usefulness to having a Head of State who's not involved in politics or policy. And yes, WE KNOW that it's not that simple, that the Monarchy has its claws in the legislative process to grant themselves shady opt-outs to tax laws and such, we know this. We just need to be shown what a good republic looks like and then be able to actually make the change to the law without it being moulded in favour of whoever was in Government at the time. We are literally facing deterioration of our Human Rights. You think the Government wont go after the most fundamental parts of our constitution once they know it's on the chopping block? The Monarchy is the very last protection we have against a tyrannical government, as weird as that may sound. People who want the Government to remove that need to have a very convincing argument.
>but I struggle to understand how some people don't some to see any benefit of the system at all

The monarchy is a living remnant symbol of a thousand years of violence, slavery, genocide and theft. It's an insult to the rest of the world to keep up the farce of dressing up rich, pompous jackasses and parading them through palaces waving around scepters encrusted with blood jewels just because some British people like to pretend they live in Narnia instead of the real world.

The one royal the UK actually liked is dead now. (edit: OK not counting Diana.) It's time to burn it all the fuck down.
"Customer Records"
The real morality play here is to publish your work.

I suggest that Shepard had a net-negative effect on the field. Anyone who might eventually have done the same research would have heard about Shepard's work and been discouraged from re-doing it. Yet, it remained obscure and little-used. It may be better to not do the research at all than to do it, mark the territory, and not publish.