skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I didn't vote either way, but your argument assumes causality without considering other factors (like lower social stigma for reporting rape and higher social expectations of police responsiveness). In general, it's much easier to repot rape and sexual assault and have the report taken seriously than it was 10, 20 or more years ago.

I think you should consider the possibility that your argument was deficient instead of making assumptions based on tropes. Communities are not monolithic and HN is less monolithic than most. For example, I differ strongly from you in not believing in censorship in the name of protecting youth, but I also differ from a lot of people here in saying that tech companies have massively failed to deal with the distribution of CSAM.
Thanks to ChatGPT that is about to become a thing of the past. First the APIs, and then the content. There was already quite a lot of paid fluff on Reddit, but it was fairly easy to recognize. Now it's easier to make and more plausible sounding, and it's going to completely drown out the humans. The value of "site:reddit.com" is plummeting.
This is one of few widely identifiable and airtight arguments against. Thanks, very concise.
Ive used your website many times :)
Nope: most NYC civil servants are required to live in the city, but the police are allowed to live in the neighboring suburbs[1]. The majority live outside of the city[2], with most commuting in by car (and then parking on the sidewalks of the neighborhoods they ostensibly serve[3]).

[1]: https://www.nyc.gov/site/nypd/careers/police-officers/po-hir...

[2]: https://gothamist.com/news/majority-nypd-officers-dont-live-...

[3]: https://twitter.com/NYPD_Parking
That feels like a cruel assumption to make. But I think that says more about me than them.
This would be exact quotes, in an LLM model this harder to recognize.

You can hardly see from the pictures AI if your picture is part of the model.
The zeitgeist of the thought leaders does tend negative
I think the pun is "See you, URL", but I agree that it makes it horribly confusing.
Many formulas or equations are floating around in papers, blogs, etc., about how to calculate training or inference latency and memory for Large Language Models (LLMs) or Transformers. Rather than doing math on papers or typing in Excel sheets, let's automate the boring stuff with llm-analysis
Grimes Unveils Software to Mimic Her Voice, Offering 50-50 Royalties
> If you can't trust your OS, trying to anonymize it is useless.

Well yeah, welcome to the modern smartphone era. Those protections are useless or counter-productive because the base ROM has already spyware backed into it.

I don't know why some people consider a chinese no-name pre-installed rom more secured than lineage os but that's not how it works.

> In pixels, the decryption key is stored in a secure enclave (Titan M). If you want to wipe the device safely, you can just reset the OS. (This wipes the decryption key from the secure enclave which turns all user data on the user data partition into random junk.

None of that matters if your data is just sent to Google anyways.
I recently installed GrapheneOS on an old Pixel and recommended practice was to relock the bootloader after unlocking it and installing a custom OS, which is supported on Pixels.
Some basic spacing and font work would go a long, long way for SourceHut.
The state doesn’t recognize such unions, but it doesn’t prohibit them either.

So you can’t have multiple marriage licenses, but you can legally hold a public polygamist civil ceremony followed by “cohabitation.”

Granted people want the legal befits of a recognized marriage rather than the state to treating it as two actors preforming a ceremony as part of a play. But such distinction are relevant when you say something is banned.
This is exactly how some "anti-virus" products behave.
Presume they'll bring the add-on into their standard monitoring / security checking!

"This add-on is not actively monitored for security by Mozilla. Make sure you trust it before installing."

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/fakespot-fake...
Imo out of the box it needs extensions to get it to be worthwhile. Its generally worse on battery than say safari, only being comparable when you factor the savings not having to render ads with ublock origin. I catch firefox processes all the time using 15% cpu with no tabs left open, restart it and it drops back to 3% like safari, so something weird is certainly going on. Sometimes I use firefox over an x11 connection and its like a new circle of hell (not what x11 is really for but its uniquely bad for a gui app on that imo, considering some full on gui ides are useable).
Sal Khan: The amazing AI super tutor for students and teachers [video]
Can confirm. Sleeping in a tent on the Serengeti whilst hyenas and lions prowl around the perimeter of the campground has a noticeable effect on one's sleep pattern and heart rate.
That doesn't mean a lot without context, in some countries gov't bonds yield 16% now but their real inflation is 50%+.
> Seems like I read that entire thing without hearing any mention of the race of the experiment's victims?

They were exclusively white by design (they enrolled all of the white patients from a particular clinic [0] who were at the targeted point in pregnancy), because the purpose of the experiment was actually to inprove health for other people [1], and to the extent that race might correlate with difference in iron absorption, keeping the study focussed on the population it was intended to help was a goal.

> I'm assuming it was much like Tuskegee in this respect?

Like Tuskegee in that it was all of inhumane, wildly racist, and that the subject population was socially vulnerable, but different in the details of how those factors combined.

[0] whose population served was poor

[1] dangerously radioactive iron was used because it made determining absorption of iron easier, not because the effects of radiation or behavior specific to radioactive iron was being studied.
If your moral code dictates what other people can or cannot do with their own lives in their homes then I contend that your moral code may be corrupt or severely misguided.
Who should set the rate on interest for loans?

Just one entity without any other consumer options?

What happens if the government makes a ton of bad loans that never get paid?
I don't know, I might enjoy Roccoco web design — it seems what we have today is just plain user-hostile. Dystopian web design?
Your second paragraph sounds more like "of course it's hacked"
> Socialism is about how workers organise their workplace (owning, managing and sharing the produce and profit of their labour)

That's a sugarcoated way of saying "imposing restrictions". You're not allowed to have private ownership of means of production. You're not allowed to just sell your labor without taking on risks.

You can practice socialism in a capitalistic society. You are forbidden to practice capitalism in a socialistic one.
Or use adblockers to block the entire site as well, if that's what they want.
Not exactly on-topic but: it appears this bill carefully defines "the Internet" as the global packet-switched network (!) but then fails to define "website", which is used (as "internet website") in the actual law. This isn't necessarily a drafting error because laws must always have undefined terms, but it is rather odd. I'm perennially concerned at the conflation of these two concepts, internet and www, because it makes it easier for malicious actors to seize personal domains and generally gatekeep the internet for use by the (commercial) web.

Anyways, back to debating porn.
Yes, it does matter because it means you made less money that you would have with other bonds of equal risk.

That's exactly why their value goes down: They make you less money. Their value goes down exactly as much as the difference in how much money you could have made on other bonds. (i.e. you can take the loss now, in lower value, or take the loss at the end by earning less.)
Thank you again. I did not mean to claim that you disregard literally all rules, and I apologize for coming across that way.

I find your explanation sound and reasonable. There are many rules that, even if not necessarily liked, are not sufficient grounds to do anything about. But sometimes rules may impede your workflow so much that you find it preferable to either quietly work around the rule, or even to quit.
Not old days. NFS is still widely used in the industry. In fact some of them cost millions of dollars for high end computer farms, e.g: isilon
> Does the name have to be registered with Zoho first?

No, you just need to add some DNS records.
Mojo fully supports arbitrary library designed types, check out the note books for examples that define custom matrix operations of various types.
I think Reddit can claim credit for making an easy framework for creating new communities, unifying the UI experience, and making discovery somewhat easier.

I still think it has devolved into one of the biggest tire fires on the Internet, but it was a cute idea. Maybe the next attempt will suck less.
Before you read any of the comments, you would be better served learning what a GSIB is and the constraints on them, the role of the FDIC, bond pricing, and what regional banks can bring to the table.

GPT-4 answered quite well, but Google is a good supplement. This comment thread appears to be software engineers saying things about stuff they don't understand.
Apply your logic about laws to private banks. Make it so private banks have to adhere to some new law. Same outcome.
Microsoft Windows 98 – The Daily Test Cycle (1998)
> I assume it's because Google is using it to collect your information but blocking everyone else from collecting it?

It isn't so much a privacy sandbox, it's an anti competition sandbox.

Google is designing standards and practices under the auspices of user privacy but in reality these changes simply lock others out of accessing data while serving it up to Google.

* Not only are they locking out competition, but they're preventing the user from stopping or mitigating collection of data as well.
One distinguishing factor to previous times is the almost infinite volume (quantity) that is now available to propagandists throughout the world. Soon enough (if not already), it is possible to automate and continuously update thousands or even tens of thousands of websites full of AI generated propaganda. If platforms are not careful, the same goes for AI bots and the like.
Dome | DevOps Engineers | San Franscisco, Los Angeles, Austin, Remote | Full-Time

Dome is building the most powerful Platform as a Service in the world that enables the infrastructure capabilities of the hyperscalers to everyone.

We are a small tight knit team that is growing quickly:

Principal Engineer, DevOps: https://wellfound.com/l/2yLq52
Yeah I think no one will likely have any edge for a simple thing like a matrix multiplication since all the right abstractions are supported in both languages and they end up in the LLVM code gen. Having Python 3 backwards compatibility and easily deploying your code to, say, phones via a C++ API is quite big though.
More than some I’d guess.

If they though they'd get away with it they would mandate public lists of who does these things.
Singeli: A DSL for building SIMD algorithms
I used the rust one a few weeks ago to shred my almost 17 year comment history. I was quite sad to do so but someone started harassing me for stopping them from scamming on the sub I moderate and I realized that it was just a liability.

On another note the Reddit admins wouldn't ban them despite them literally and repeatedly scamming money from users by pretending to need food. Despite them also posting at the same time about the weed they just bought. And also harrasing me and others across the site. One of the admins kept pushing it for me but apparently the team in charge thought it was a difficult case and only sent them a warning. The whole thing was just disgusting.
> Is it compelling? Not sure - depends on licensing terms, co-location costs, what are you doing, energy costs, AND compute power.

It seems like Linux always wins in terms of licensing, so does it currently lose in any of those metrics?

Also, since Linux runs on IBM POWER systems, it looks a lot like IBM's AIX has very little place to stand: Even if the hardware is better (which, judging from experience with other proprietary workstation vendors like Sun, I'd be surprised about) the value proposition of running Linux as opposed to a proprietary OS with less effective support and expensive licensing appears insurmountable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerLinux

So, I'd be willing to believe that IBM's hardware is better in some ways, but I'm more skeptical about IBM's software in a realm where an apples-to-apples comparison is possible.
I thought insolvency was when you didnt have the current assets to pay currently due liabilities? A 30 year note for $1M doesnt have to be paid right now. But it's ~$4000 per month interest does. So you can have $4k in cash assets and $1M in debt and still be solvent (for now).
Yes, they have done things like this before. IBM is good at PR.
In VFX a single texture can have terabytes..
I taught my kid that the way to think of infinity is that it's like hugs, there's always one more, unlike candy, which is limited and can be counted, infinity cannot be counted.
There is some confusion because there _are_ DRM systems that require users to use Secure Boot with a TPM:

https://www.reddit.com/r/pcgaming/comments/phutif/riot_games...
Nothing wrong with government wanting people to wear burkas and cover up some more, it’s part of respectful and dignified society. Maybe don’t insult and denigrate modesty and other cultures next time.
Why can't that be the central bank? We don't have private courts?
> Anything that can hijack the dopaminergic system

This is far too broad, just because something could be used for evil is not enough to ban it for all children. What about TVs? Candy? Stimulating toys? I think all of these can have negative outcomes when abused, but that isn't enough for me to say all children should not access them.
The neural net gives a very noisy approximation of some ideal structure. So you're looking for what that ideal structure is, which very possibly does not require a neural network to represent.
> There's no such thing as "contaminated" marijuana, that's an urban myth.

Is it a myth? In Germany black market cannabis has been found to be lined with synthetic cannabinoids in many cases. Those substances are not researched well and hundreds of their users (who typically didn't expect any synthetic drugs) required emergency medical care according to this German (sorry) source from two years ago: https://www.vice.com/de/article/m7a533/chemisch-gestrecktes-...

The German minister of health cites this situation as his main motivation for working towards legalization, so people wouldn't have to buy from questionable sources.
I already added "Mojo Evangelism is my mojo" in my LinkedIn Title.
My objection is the additional leverage it grants over employees. If by reporting a safety issue in the workplace, harassment or even just landing on a bad boss I risk getting evicted from my house - I'm going to be far more motivated to suck it up and deal with it. Strike? Eviction. Complain? Eviction. Try to unionize? Turbo-eviction.

Now that's less likely when the employee owns the house as the article says, but that'll change too. And of course it ties your fates together. If the company goes under, your house becomes worthless too. If you want to move to a new employer chances are you'll have to relocate anyways.

I guess next step is company scrip? What's old is new again.
Oh :-(
Why is it not interently protected speech?

If you are going to make exceptions to the first admendment for safety can you prove the danger explicitly?

Why not the 2nd admendment?
> I read that as "ok, you got a free piano, but now you've got to invest a lot of time into learning how to play it".

Also not the easiest thing to move to where you want to use it, as opposed to wherever it happened to be when it was gifted to you.
OK, so I guess I'm just understanding that mathematicians arbitrarily decided to prioritize "even" over "odd"?

Because as I stated in another comment, you could just as easily say odd cardinality exists if you can find two subsets with the same cardinality and there's one element left over, and otherwise we call it even.

So at the end of the day, what you're saying is that ultimately infinity would be even just because mathematicians arbitrarily defined 'even' that way -- not because there's any intuitive logic behind it, any deeper justification, or any necessary consistency with parity for finite sets.
I wonder when things will progress to the point where you could run a LLM that would do a good enough impression of a therapist on a 4090. I honestly think the only way I could trust something like this is if it was running on my own hardware, or a private cloud instance.
At some point it's going to be worth calculating whether malware (the vast majority of which is mitigated by not running as admin) or the latest update is going to be more disruptive to your workflow.

At least on the systems I manage, workstation updates have been responsible for a lot larger share of the same kind of problems (data loss, availability loss, etc.) that I am starting to get questions that I don't have very convincing answers for.
Will Mojo be OSS? Or is this strictly proprietary?
Prehistoric Planet – Season 2 [Trailer]
Nothing different was done the last forty times this was said, who are you even speaking to?
I live on an island with 25k people. And we've got 13 bank branches, and had one credit union branch (they close this branch, but their outdoor ATM remains). One branch is closing soon, because two banks merged and they don't need to keep both their branches.
> If victims would be primarily black or native that wouldn't change anything about the diabolic nature of the experiment but it would add a very relevant spin to it.

What if they were all poor and white, because the study creators didn’t care about poor people, but also were concerned about the clarity of the data for actually improving health for White people, viewing any possible variation introduced by a more representative study population as noise?

(Asking because that is, in fact, how the study was designed; at least, the targeting, the assumption about why it was targeted that way is an inference.)

https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/radiation/dir/mstreet/commeet/pm0...
>ChatGPT is a viral AI chatbot that is trained on huge amounts of data and is able to generate response to user queries. It is a form of so-called generative AI.

The lazy use of viral when talking about computer tech here annoys me slightly.
I think this is more accurate for non-emotional reasons. The GPT models have actually been trained to lie in the sense that they will tell you something convincing not just about the topic, but also how they are getting the information, e.g. “I checked my sources and found…”. You can also see jailbreaks where it has been trained to reverse belief on sensitive topics. This is consistently deceptive bias rather than random variance.

Imagine if Apple had a generative image model that produces fake metadata and watermarks showing the data cam from a real iPhone, and then signs it with their key. That would show obvious intent to deceive rather than attempt to accurately represent reality.
this is well-said, in the case where correctness is required. But low-trust communications via low-profit activity like tech-support, cheap ads, help lines for government, and even some professional services.. won't care; Employers gain and employees are redundant, next! In those businesses, it is an old story that the cheapest, cruelest and most-scofflaw company wins.. not even debatable that is true.. so here comes MSFT to sell it to you.
This is a 100% fed driven problem. You have very low interest rates and you flood the economy with a lot of cash. The banks get higher deposits and they need to manage all this cash, what do you do? Long term “safe bonds” at low interest rates get destroyed when interest rates go up, so does the risky stock market and real estate (residential and commercial). Where do you park the money? Hold cash? You can lend it out, but again we’re talking about an all time low interest rate environment flush with cash, where the only demand for credit is from risky lenders. There was way more money with the banks than there was a need for credit. How else could the banks have mitigated the risk?

I’m definitely not making excuses for poor decision making by some of these banks, but still. Even if you want to play it safe and do things by the regulation, how do you do it?
I wonder if there are any anti-trust measures controlling unlimited mergers.
Rocket Carrying Astronaut's Cremated Remains Blows Up at Launch
My understanding is everyone involved tried to clarify that it’s not covered. Not sure why the addition isn’t there
Yes, I bought a cheap fountain pen together with a book I could improve my writing on.
Thanks for your interest, I'm pretty confident we can do this. I've been working on compilers and languages for awhile. :)

Your point about LLVM compile time is great one. Mojo is architected from the beginning for fast compile times, including deeply integrated caching and distributed compilation. LLVM "isn't slow" if you don't keep asking it to do the same thing over and over again.

-Chris
> buy something like sudafed at a pharmacy

Anything with pseudoephedrine, ephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine requires scanning by US federal mandate.

It is done so the government can capture it across the nation.

I am just saying that there are things that already have the requirements of data collection & retention both at Federal and State level in the USA.
So then the government can arrest children without due process, hold them without trial, charge them with sedition for anti government comments?
Not all nature is the same. Wetland birds often have limited energy reserves, particularly if they have just migrated in. They evolved to take off when they are disturbed. Increase in disturbance can have a real impact on mortality. And the habitats are often very scarce. A single site can be very important to a species and host a significant proportion of a regional population. But the only way to know is to study it.

My hunch is that construction will have a lot of effect on birds close to the site (say within a few hundred metres). But actual rocketry will be less of a problem as it is currently so irregular. Also, the presence of tourists may cause a lot of disturbance and closing parts of the beach, and banning dogs (scary to birds) could help a lot. Part of the solution could be making other parts of the reserve better.
Slave labor, most likely.
Yep if you read what the CEO said the quote was that they "could" replace workers with AI over five years and as the tech improves. That's just pure speculation and bullshitting, like when Elon said Tesla cars will be fully self driving vehicles in five years. It's market pumping talk from a company with a vested interest in selling "AI" to enterprises.
There was a scandal in China where a company sold homes to the employees then fire them a couples of years later. Former employees stuck with mortgages they couldn’t pay. There are so many problems that happened, these homes were close to the workplace while being far away, very undesirable to outsiders
It mostly seems like they suck for us lefties and the articles about how to use them are just attempts to sell more fountain pens to lefties. The main point of superiority for fountain pens is if you are the person selling fountain pens.

A lot of ballpoints absolutely suck for lefties too, but you can get good ballpoints that work perfect for left handed writing for 30x-100x less than the fountain pens in the article. And not have to jump through hoops or go through any hassle to get them to work.