skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Could be, I guess the downside of this is that you don't get full control of the UI which is a problem for some products. Depends on the tradeoffs I guess.

In general I am a fan of just using things like Stripe Checkout though - it's not just about compliance but also just the complexity of getting the frontend part right with the myriad different payment flows, errors, and other subtle details that exist.

But my original comment was more just clearing up confusion that you can absolutely do the frontend UI customly if you want to - there's no issue with this and PCI compliance, that only kicks in once the data goes to your server.
>In general, you should be running the EXPO profile: this "upclocks" your RAM. I use the term "upclock" instead of overclock because you aren't pushing your RAM past its manufacturer's limit, you are pushing it to that limit. The JEDEC profile (the opposite of EXPO) is extremely conservative and can significantly affect performance.

Any source I could find says that EXPO does void warranty, as it is overclocking. https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/expo (in footnotes section at the end of page)

It might move RAM to it's manufacturer spec as you said but it does it by overclocking CPU

> So with Ryzen, if should consider purchasing RAM that is matched to the IF clock. For Ryzen 7 that is 6000MT/s. If you purchased RAM above that, you should definitely decrease the clock to match IF (you can tighten RAM timing to take advantage of the more expensive chips that you purchased, if you have the patience to).

Do you know any good benchmark (preferably Linux one) that would show those differences? I will be getting 7800X3D in few days so I want to test it for a bit.

> What am I doing? I am going to disable EXPO, but I will definitely be re-enabling once this has been resolved.

The core of the issue seems to be "just" overvolting so I'm guessing any manual overclock would still be fine. I have no need for it now (just puny 1070 to pair it with for now), but yeah, wait for new BIOS firmware seems to be best option.

> Aside: What is MT/s vs MHz? DDR stands for "double data rate", meaning the MHz that everyone uses to describe the speed of RAM is a misnomer. "6000MHz" RAM actually runs at 3000MHz (but does two transfers per clock cycle). So: Mega-Transfers per Second.

Not exactly. The specified speed is only speed of the bus between memory and CPU, not the speed of memory chip itself. DDR4 3200 and DDR5 6400 have exact same internal speed (400MHz) and this is why there isn't much of latency improvement between generations (DDR5 does have some other tricks for latency).

Also the 6400MHz is actual speed data is put on the bus, even if clock is half of that.

It's pretty much entirely so the RAM chips don't have some insane number of pins but something manageable.
> Pill was more direct. He said there’s a “reluctance to accept that yes, we’re all worse off and we all have to take our share.”

They should look into taxing the various British Overseas Territories which usually top lists of tax havens across the world [1].

I am not sure if the regular British public is just ignorant of the existence of these, or prefers to run with the limited set of facts that their Conservative government (now in its 13th year) is presenting to them. The Brexit shitshow seems to suggest the former.

----------------------------------------

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/mar/09/uk-overseas...
I'm an application develop who uses oauth, but it's only one in many authentication systems I've used, and certainly one of the worst.
1. Their existence is the political justification for inaction.

2. They form an unholy alliance with other anti-empiricist groups (e.g. anti-vaxxers, young earth creationists) to undermine reality-based policies, including in education.

3. Their denialist opinions are typically held in bad faith. That is, they are held because if they were true they would confirm some pre-existing belief (e.g. that scientists are tools of a global elite cabal), not because an independent evaluation of the facts has led them there. This reinforces their hostility towards whatever group they think is lying.

4. Denialists typically engage in a perverse form of virtue signaling. The greater and more well evidence a claim is, the greater the "cred" they get for denying it. This creates a fertile field for sham experts to sell lies to members.
> What I'm wondering is how long it will be before we see a similar device/service for Starlink's network.

For low bandwidth applications like Swarm, perhaps a cheap 4g breakout board would work out-of-the-box with the right plan.
The short answer is that, yes, embeddings are probably a hack in the same way that using bits or short variable names were hacks to reduce memory usage. At some point you are correct: someone would prompt "given <large amount of data>, answer <user request>".
My worst is a similar financial institution, which bills monthly and contracts annually.
Ah yes, highlight.js. One innocent

import hljs from 'highlight.js';

pulls in over a Megabyte of hundreds of programming language syntax definitions.

Do you really need Mathematica, "ISBL", and "GML" — or would a curated list of popular programming languages such as Python, Java, JavaScript, and HTML ("xml.js" ) be enough? This results in a massive reduction down to ~70 kilobytes.

Even better: load this reduced size of highlight.js only on demand, leveraging Webpack's "import(..) to webpack chunk" mechanism:

const getHighlightJs = async function() {
let result;
if (window.hljs) {
result = window.hljs;
}
else {
result = (await import('highlight.js/lib/core')).default;

const javascript = (await import('highlight.js/lib/languages/javascript')).default;
result.registerLanguage('javascript', javascript);

const xml = (await import('highlight.js/lib/languages/xml')).default;
result.registerLanguage('xml', xml);
// xml provides html/html5 highlighting

window.hljs = result;
}
return result;
};

const lazyHighlightAll = async function() {
let result = null;
// see https://highlightjs.org/usage/
// highlight.js's hljs.highlightAll() matches on 'pre > code'
const hasHighlightableCode = document.querySelector('pre > code') ? true : false;
if (hasHighlightableCode) {
const hljs = await getHighlightJs();
hljs.highlightAll();
result = hljs;
}
return result;
};

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() {
lazyHighlightAll();
});
Hmm, really? How come? That never happened to me, I don't think.
Does this apply to people who infiltrate what they believe are corrupt companies with the expectation of digging up dirt, and thus sign the confidentiality agreements with the expectation of violating them?

Does this apply to moral wrongs, which are technically legal (e.g. cruel conditions at animal farms)?
It might not be temperature sensor itself but circuitry measuring it. Yeah sensor is "just a diode" but that needs amplifier and ADC to get to the rest of the system
He's said it's the last time he will play the character, and that he won't be involved with the upcoming TV show. In a quite stern way, saying he "expects that it will be the last time you see the character", i.e. making sure that future digital resurrections will get bad press for going against his will.
I think a more charitable read is “we ask our subscribers what 10 things really annoy them; this was one of them we could afford to fix so we did. ”
> Why?

Because the fertility that they see expressed around them by adults acts as the ceiling, not the floor for their own future fertility. If grandpa had 3 and mom had 3, you might only have 1 or 2, you'll very rarely ever have 4 of your own.

This is just the nature of those numbers... a person with 2 kids is, theoretically, working on a third. Until they get too old, and then it's an "oops".

So, it ratchets downward. When someone waits too long and has fewer, then they become the normal that children around them see, those children internalize the new number (or at least some sort of fuzzy average of those adults around them).

One would expect that to decline ever faster. And that's in fact what we see so far... instead of a fertility rate of 1.4 that just holds steady for centuries until extinction, it drops year to year and decade to decade, and will take far less than a millennium.

> Could someone just 60 years ago easily predicted the current situation?

Probably, if they somehow could have shed their 1960s biases. The trend had already started.

> Turns out the Japanese society was one of the most malleable ones that ever existed.

It's not malleable at all. Adaptable is one thing. Adaptation is an active verb, each person individually and all collectively will themselves to change, so to speak, to overcome challenges. They do that occasionally.

Malleability suggests that some outside force can come along and change them against their will, or at least without them noticing... and they are less malleable than many other cultures. If they were malleable, then we'd expect far more results from the various programs that the government puts in place to alter their culture. And those programs have fallen flat on their faces. They don't make a dent in Japanese work culture, they won't make a dent in Japanese fertility.

We're probably only 25 years or less away from 0.3 fertility rate. By about that time, it won't be so easy to argue against those who say what I'm saying... so those who did will have moved on to "this is a good thing". Some are already hinting it in the other replies. They hate humans, they wish they never existed, and they are secretly cheering this on. (Yet, I'm the fascist somehow.)

This would make me sad, except that it's difficult to be too upset about people who wish they never existed making themselves extinct.
ActivityPub is the core protocol and is a W3C standard

Mastodon is the most popular implementation currently, but there are many other implementations in the fediverse
Found the time traveling Bill Gates on HN
Google has good engineers and a long history of high throughput computing. This, combined with a lack of understanding what ML research is like (versus deployment), led to the original TF1 API. Also, the fact that google has good engineers working in a big bureaucracy probably hid a lot of the design problems as well.

TF2 was a total failure, in that TF1 can do a few things really well when you get the hang of it, but TF2 was just a strictly inferior version of pytorch, further plagued by confusion due to TF1. In alternate history, if Google pivoted in to JAX much earlier and more aggressively, they could still be in the game. I speak as someone who has at some point knew all the intricacies and differences between TF1 and TF2.
Film and TV is a multi billion dollar industry that produces, whether purposeful or not, whether with nefarious intentions or not, mass media propaganda, memes and narratives that millions of people around the world consume, and which then informs their views on and understanding of the world, history, culture, the human condition etc. To say their is no power involved in this process is naive.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays

"... the father of public relations". His best-known campaigns include a 1929 effort to promote female smoking by branding cigarettes as feminist "Torches of Freedom", and his work for the United Fruit Company in the 1950s, connected with the CIA-orchestrated overthrow of the democratically elected Guatemalan government in 1954. He worked for dozens of major American corporations including Procter & Gamble and General Electric, and for government agencies, politicians, and nonprofit organizations.

Of his many books, Crystallizing Public Opinion (1923) and Propaganda (1928) gained special attention as early efforts to define and theorize the field of public relations. Citing works of writers such as Gustave Le Bon, Wilfred Trotter, Walter Lippmann, and Sigmund Freud (his own double uncle), he described the masses as irrational and subject to herd instinct—and he outlined how skilled practitioners could use crowd psychology and psychoanalysis to control them in desired ways."

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Randolph

Marc Bernays Randolph - an American tech entrepreneur, advisor and speaker.[1] He is the cofounder and first CEO of Netflix.
Another paternal great-uncle of Randolph was Edward Bernays, an Austrian-American pioneer in the field of public relations and propaganda.
No need to add unnecessary political commentary
> This creates another problem where the new crop isn't curious about tech for it's own sake

This is not a problem and has never been a problem. Some of the best developers that I've worked with have absolutely no interest in turning on a computer when they leave work.
The other issue is scaling. Will price per ad continue to decrease? If so hwo long can meta continue to increase impressions per user without losing users? Otherwise revenue won't stay flat, it'll decrease.
Lucasfilm/Disney is hoping positive reviews of this tech will allow them to make unlimited CGI/AI/Deepfake movies in the future starring any actor from the past at any age, eliminating the need for an actor's involvement beyond a likeness rights contract.
That's not... no..

Math requires practice. Math homework gave you the repeated practice necessary to encompass the subject. History homework was often a reading assignment, so the classroom time could be spent on discussion instead of variable reading speeds. The same for sciences, where instead of reading, the classroom time could be spent on discussion and experiments.

Even grammar homework had its point in the learning process. So no, it wasn't just about learning discipline, it was often about the practice.

We homeschool. Finding suitable practice books was a large part of the job.
Disgusting. I just watched some videos and it seems to be mostly used as a soft attack on bicyclists, environmentalists, pedestrians, people on the left etc. Some “anti-environmentalists” were literally sticking their face right next to the exhaust while it was rolling coal to make a point lol. That’ll show them.
Triaging, fixing, and backporting patches to CVEs that we were never _really_ vulnerable to but that are going to show up if a customer runs a scanner (and customers love to have zero tolerance policies for CVEs above a certain severity score).

A specific recurring example: My team works on CLI tools. CLI tools are not web servers, but may need to make network calls and so consume networking libraries. We have a steady trickle of server-side CVEs to triage, and some of them we need to apply the patch just for the sake of someone else's compliance/policy.

Solutions include:
- make libraries more granular (e.g. a client-only library which is consumed by the client/server library);
- make scanning tools 'smarter'
- (e.g. there's some efforts in golang around a scanning tool that only detects vulns in code it can tell is reachable from static analysis)
- e.g. I wish i could declare to a scanner "you are scanning a CLI that does not and cannot start a persistent webserver" -- there _might_ be room in the industry for a concept like SBOM but for behaviors - SBOB?
- a consulting firm selling the fortune 500 type co.s on a more nuanced CVE stance?

Unfortunately I don't think there's any money to be made solving this problem, and in general the incentives of CVE scanners are misaligned, much like how anti-virus software thrives when it tells you how many viruses it just blocked....
>> for instance a first child would get you 180 euros per month (if your household earns less than 36k otherwise you get 0 and still pay high tax unlike poor people)

No, you have the right amount (i actually think it's a bit less for young children, i have to check but 180 should be the money you get for kids over 12 or something like that), but the "tranche 1" is for taxable income under 71k, not 36k. Then, if your taxable income is under 100k (a bit less i think), you get half the anount (so 90), and over 100k you get half again (so 45). But you still get money, even if you are a high earner.

> the tax break is of a maximum of 1500 euros for a child. I don't know if you have children but I guarantee this costs much more than that

Gp said that it was only for the poor, i said it was not. I totally agree it's not enough.

> and if you earn much more the max is 1500euros from tax rebate. knowing that rich people send their kids to expensive childcare, schools, buy more expensive goods.

No, the daycare, even private ones, are "conventionné", and the CAF (and municipality) is paying at least half the cost (in some area it's 90%, but most likely it's 60%). If you're rich enough, ou can pay a baby-sitter, and half their salary is another tax-break. It's the same for the school. Unless you send them to unsanctionned school (and this is your right, but you cannot complain), the state is paying the teachers, the municipailty the sport and probably the 90% of the bus.

If you're poor enough, sport is free, museums are free, music school is free (and obviously school "cost" (200 euros) is taking care of by the CAF). Free meals too (i think it was like 70 euros for 31 * 5 meals until my 14 anniversary). Ah, and Youth camps are mostly free too! (but limited access, and defunded in the past ten years). 100 euros vacations in the Alps, on the azure coast, or kayaking down a river, for two weeks. Good memories.

Anyway, the subject was that EU was against natalist politics, i think we can say France have a natalist politics (less and less funded, true), that my familly benefited from, so GP was wrong. The details do not really matter.
It appears that they used Webpack, which I found interesting given other alternatives.
number of users is one thing.

how many actively use it is another probably more useful metric.
(map link-expander list-of-links)

I wonder what it looks like in Arc. Does HN keep any of its codebase public?
This looks like "we didn't told anyone about limits they should not cross" or maybe had too optimistic ones in NDA'd docs they passed to the mobo vendors.

Or mobo vendors dropped the balls and thought those were "recommended" and not "absolute max"
I feel like we would all have been better off if Amazon had not been allowed to do this.
I imagine this technology is only going to get better - I suspect it won't be long before Harrison Ford appears in dozens of movies every year even after his death.
Your comment adds nothing useful to the discussion, as GP never said it was a matter of cost. I am in the same boat and it’s about convenience and/or the loss of what we currently have. Netflix both raised prices and reduced what you get.
Yes, they and others certainly will.

Generative AI will bring about widespread deflation in the cost of entertainment… which will be great for society. Can’t really put the genie back in the bottle once it’s out.

Why even pay licensing fees to existing actors? Just create your own personas to repackage. Of course there’s some value in the immediate term to using recognizable likenesses, but not likely to be a longer lived trend.

We can look back 10, 20, 100 years and easily recognize the huge benefits technology has brought to society, and still whenever something new gets created there are people that will fight it tooth and nail over very shortsighted concerns.
Have you tried turning animations off? The setting should be in the Accessibility section somewhere. When you open an app from the app drawer, there is that little animation where the app icon grows, the screen fades to white/black, and then the app display fades into view, which all adds up to about 100-500ms. If you disable the animation it should open almost instantly.
Yeah, I couldn't square that statement with all the comments about age discrimination that I see on this board.
Transistor density doesn't really matter by itself. What matters is that density influences speed, power consumption, and price. Historically all these have improved exponentially with exponentially increasing transistor density [1]. Yet:

> Power and Performance were the first two metrics to “fall off” the Moore’s Law curve. Transistor power reductions slowed nearly 20 years ago—each successive node generally reduced active and standby (leakage) current, but not at the 2X reduction per node. Transistor performance gains slowed shortly after; again, each node is generally faster, but not by 2X.

Moreover:

> Where Moore’s Law has slowed or even reversed, however, is the cost per component. Doubling density used to cut the cost per transistor in half, which was the primary enabler of the electronics revolution. Moore’s Law meant we’d get twice the number of transistors (which were faster and less power-hungry) for the same cost.

> As the chart (Fig. 2) shows, this began slowing at the 40-nm node, and virtually stopped when the industry moved to FinFETs. New nodes enable “close-to-Moore” chip-size scaling, but this is nearly completely offset by exploding wafer-fabrication costs. Various analyses show fabricated wafer costs increasing 3-5X over the 28-nm node, with 5-nm wafer costs approaching $18K each.

There is also the fact that SRAM scaling has almost stopped with TSMC's N3 [2].

[1] https://www.electronicdesign.com/industrial-automation/artic...

[2] https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/7343/iedm-2022-did-we-just-wi...
And the killer is this:

We had an IRC server. IT and Ops used it.

We moved to ejabberd. IT, Ops, and a couple of devs used it. Not all.

We moved to Zulip. Everyone in the company uses it.
I don’t know if TSMC’s days are numbered, but at best they seem to be fumbling with their 3nm process and it kinda seems like Intel is hitting bottom as far as their process development woes are concerned. Theres an intel 7 refresh up next rumored at the end of the year for consumers, and then they will seemingly take their next swing at gpus with Battlemage and should be ready to release intel 4 consumer products next year. Imho, at least, they seem to have the most exciting stuff coming next year.
> It's a two way street

Yup, this is my point.
> I'm seeing my mental abilities diminish pretty rapidly

Maybe you're current job is making you annoyed which is making you less productive?

I've come to realize when this is happening to me and just move. Might be worth interviewing to see if anything takes your fancy.
Don't forget readarr for books and audiobooks. For serving media I personally prefer jellyfin with its overseer equivalent, jellyseer.
Wasteful and the wrong place to do it. Also, Sidekiq is slow, old, and commercial crippleware.

Generate and send SQL (wrapped in transactions) from C bindings via a proper background job processor like beanstalkd in batches of say 50k. Getting Ruby involved in millions of records is asking for trouble.
There were few reports from non-asus ones IIRC, but it's hard to tell whether that was same "the EXPO profile loaded from memory fried it" or someone just going "MoRe VoLtS BeTtEr" and frying it.
oh I fully agree. I'm just pointing out that even the defining example of "moonshot" took some serious dedication of resources and time.

What's really wild is that the entire Apollo program cost ~$25 Billion in 1973 (of course est. $163 billion today) while Meta already spent $36 Billion on the Metaverse [0].

0. https://www.businessinsider.com/meta-lost-30-billion-on-meta...
Crypto has nowadays three meanings.

The first was cryptography, the second in currency as you describe, but the third meaning and most important one is related to the latin root of that word in the sense of "secret", "hidden": https://www.etymonline.com/word/crypto-

When talking about something crypto, one must measure these two "secret" and "hidden" attributes. Signal was never really adopted because of its suspicious origin and strange adoption by whatsapp. Similar case for a few other messengers like Matrix if you get around to see that in more detail.