skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
From the same source:

> Since some biospherians were starting to have symptoms like sleep apnea and fatigue, Walford and the medical team decided to boost oxygen with injections in January and August 1993. The oxygen decline and minimal response of the crew indicated that changes in air pressure are what trigger human adaptation responses. These studies enhanced the biomedical research program.

> [...]

> The respiration rate was faster than the photosynthesis (possibly in part due to relatively low light penetration through the glazed structure and the fact that Biosphere 2 started with a small but rapidly increasing plant biomass) resulting in a slow decrease of oxygen. A mystery accompanied the oxygen decline: the corresponding increase in carbon dioxide did not appear. This concealed the underlying process until an investigation by Jeff Severinghaus and Wallace Broecker of Columbia University's Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory using isotopic analysis showed that carbon dioxide was reacting with exposed concrete inside Biosphere 2 to form calcium carbonate in a process called carbonatation, thereby sequestering both carbon and oxygen.

> [...]

> After Biosphere 2's first mission, extensive research and system improvements were undertaken, including sealing concrete to prevent the uptake of carbon dioxide.

Long story short: it was primarily an issue with the concrete absorbing the carbon dioxide (which otherwise would've been converted back into oxygen), lowering overall air pressure. Said issue was fixed by the second mission.
>[1]: https://www.latimes.com/projects/la-me-pay-to-stay-jails/?wp...

Wow, it really feels like everything has been productized already.
> "Rule for thee but not for me" when you've got Kissinger on board

How does that work? Kissinger (as well as lots of other very rich, powerful people with government connections) was one of the victims of the fraud.
I think if you look at it from the otherside it makes more sense.

A problem that is common is that we send these JSON blobs over the wire that aren't purpose fit. So, with GraphQL, we can construct a query graph that makes the JSON blobs slimmer and more purpose fit, by constructing the queries to return the data we desire for some particular business reasons we need to represent in the UI, for instance.

I got the argument with mutations need to match things more closely, but I'd argue you can cross compose mutations w/ resolvers too.

I think this is what they're getting at. Just throwing the database schema over the wall via GraphQL isn't that much better than REST, and takes zero advantage of abilty to use revolvers to construct purpose built queries
Related ongoing thread:

Why is OAuth still hard in 2023? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35713518 - April 2023 (129 comments)
Netflix had some great quotes about this from their earnings and specifically called out Kantar's data would show less viewers in the short term.

They had noted they saw or expected the users who were on someone else's account and who used it actively to come back with their own accounts or convince the account holder to pay for them

I did more of a write up based on what they are shared in their earnings here:
https://upollo.ai/blog/learning-from-netflixs-earnings
3nm, 5nm, and so on are all just marketing terms completely disconnected from silicon geometry anyway. I get that it might be slightly confusing to see it misspelled, but it's still not that important.
Minecraft 4K Translated to C
I’m not sure that, in a competitive environment where profit margins are small, that working vast fewer hours is going to beat an aggressive approach like Taiwan’s.

This wouldn’t be a problem, we just let Taiwan work themselves silly why we share in the benefit by getting better and better computer chips, but that doesn’t work if we want to COMPETE with Taiwan in this area.
The IPv6 spec was published in 1998. 25 years on it should be nearly flawless. Not “most software,” all software including firewalls should support it with safe and sensible defaults.

The current state of support and adoption is frankly abysmal. The attack surface is non-negligable. And there is no end in sight.

The idea of deploying a new version of the internet protocol (which lacks backwards compatibility for reasons) in parallel to the existing version should never have left the drafting table.
> First, you need crew trained on these different modules, so not only would you be swapping out modules, but swapping out a large portion of the crew.

Swapping out a large portion of the crew doesn't seem that uncommon? My friends in the navy get assigned deployments in a group, stay with the boat for several months and then come home and work on base for several months, etc. Often there's a significant time for the ship in port while the crew is swapped out. But, I don't get a lot of details.
Out of interest, is it the double standards that bother you or the punishment?
Writing a Kubernetes Network Plugin (CNI) in Rust
Perhaps I should explain. What I actually did was suggest that it would be in their interest to take out the bit that some readers were complaining about, because it felt like an ad at the end. Of course they were free not to follow my suggestion.

I admit that's not precisely how I described it in the GP comment but it never crossed my mind that anyone would care. Commenter objections never fail to surprise!

Edit: I think I was right that it was in their interest as well as all of ours, because earlier the thread was dominated by complaints like this:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35718321

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35718172

... and after the change, it has been filling up with much more interesting on-topic comments. From my perspective that's a win-win-win, but YMMV.
> Most people think about auth in terms of usernames/passwords or API keys.

OAuth is hard to explain here because it is not an authentication protocol, and without extensions has severe security flaws in being one. OpenID Connect is the most popular effort extending OAuth to also handle authentication.

But that doesn't change that the thing OAuth is most associated with is not what it actually sets out to accomplish.
It is an interesting dichotomy. A 10 year sentence at any age is basically the end of your life as it existed. When you get out, you won't even have a credit score if someone wasn't managing these things for you. Most people never recover from that, some lucky ones do. But in the U.S., for many crimes, folks would not see 10 years as enough.
However sceptical you may be about it, Meta deserves credit for at least trying to do something new with VR and Metaverse. We will see Apple follow suit in the next few months.

I really feel actually that Google is the outlier here in underperforming their innovation quota. It seems to me they hired a bunch of high level managers who somehow got envy of Ballmer-era Microsoft and tried to re-invent it at Google. I can't understand how or why this seems like a good strategy but it's all I can make of the fact that have withdrawn from every innovative product they were interested in.
Amen to that

I'm not usually a conspiracy theorist, but I think this is a very thorough and very effective ongoing response to Occupy Wall Street. That movement has been handily forked into the completely pointless: Trump vs Mexicans, Bernie vs Billionaires, and Democrats vs Nazis
no powers that be, here. I was thinking of a Latino woman who was arrested while in labor for a traffic violation and she was handcuffed to the hospital bed and arrested as soon as she delivered.

if she was rich that would not have happened.

if she was white that would not have happened.

poor people pay for being poor every day of their lives in dozens of ways.

minorities pay for being minorities every day of their lives in dozens of ways.

I could have separated wealth from race, yes, and I should have.
To the sibling commenters: I would say no-one should be getting raped or subject to slave labor in prison... theoretically the aim even for those in "worse" prisons should be to have them come out the other side able to function in society better than before, not worse.
Given that this seems to describe a real problem, why hasn't anyone launched a proxy service that normalizes across the varying implementations?

Why should tens of thousands of developers have to discover the particular quirks of an implementation instead of doing it once and re-using the results?
Such discomfort. Sounds rough. I hear they don't even have baristas.
It's fairly easy to make your own TOTP provider.

I wrote a simple CLI TOTP utility that works using an AES encrypted lookup table of secrets.

I piggybacked access to this off an unrelated web site and it is now readily available from any device if you have the decrypt key and know the URL.
> the food sucks

If you're leaving during the day, can't you eat then?
I totally have to rollback anything i said before. Just now i understand what happens in the background. Nobody is directly granted and the waitlist is indeed there to block me from using it.

I just hammered against it and found out you are totally right. Which is a real pain, because i have lots of things to test and checkout with more tokens.

I am working with a friend on something, and i know he has access, we share the code and tomorrow i wanted to start using GPT-4 with it.

So i am now as disappointed as you are.

Sorry for my confusion, but like i said, i had no prior need for a paid account (api) and the docs do nowhere mention that.
Quite.

And also typically occurring on the ground / before the flight. Even where considerations such as crew resource management / cultures of deference (still a factor in recent air incidents, see Asiana 214 in 2013, for example).

Which itself encompasses a whole slew of factors: false beliefs, groupthink, politics, cultures of fear (or simply conformity), etc., etc.

What I find most interesting about discussions of all of these is that they are so broadly applicable, and are often the parts of incident post morta which are most generalisable to other domains and situations.
Sounds like it was whether Python or Ruby is more popular back then, which was won by Python but then people still preferred Ruby because of its elegant language design and those voices seem finally heard around enough.

I even see Crystal (grammatically similar compiled language) gaining attention.

I do love Ruby syntax and used it on several occasions but it's typing system seems far from elegant compared to TypeScript in my opinion which doesn't want me to switch to Ruby at this point.
NYC Link5G Towers Must Pass Preservation and Environmental Reviews Says FCC
Allow me to introduce you to ReactOS.

https://reactos.org/
none and as an experienced user you should know that's it's not one shot and most of the time not even few shot... You can't compare cherry picked press images with few shots of a 5 second prompt. I don't know why you want to hype something up if you can't really compare it. It seems extremly attention grifting.

Just look at their cherry picks in this discord... https://discord.com/invite/pxewcvSvNx .
It's overfitted on images with copyright (afghan girl) and doesn't show more "compositional power" at all most of the time ignoring half of the prompt.
That's great to see. Thanks for sharing! It's been almost 20 years since I read the first part.
You can train a handwriting recognition model on a CPU as part of a current-day class.

https://towardsdatascience.com/build-a-handwritten-text-reco...
Right now the initial hot industrial application for NeRF's are recovering radiance fields from ordinary video footage. You can have someone just walk around with an ordinary camera or phone, just making sure they have decent coverage. Then back in the studio after a bunch of crunching you get a 3d virtual set you can position a camera in arbitrarily. The quality of this is considerably better than previous approaches that were based on recovering 3d meshes.

The work in the original post can now extend that process to capturing HDR data, which should enable better quality when compositing with other footage or rendered elements. And you don't need some special HDR video camera, just an ordinary one can sample the same thing.
Thread or WiFi transport, but yes, I'm sure Thread was influential.
Jesus. That was harrowing. I just cannot even imagine the hopelessness that he felt. It is pure cosmic horror.

This just makes me so angry. The amount of corruption, racism, and incompetence for this to happen is staggering and quite honestly incomprehensible. A, what appears to be non-U.S. citizen, person makes a bogus accusation against two black men who are U.S. citizens. The accusation has no consistency or accuracy, and not a single shred of evidence was ever presented. And the accusation was theft of a backpack. So the mere word of a foreigner sentences a man to prison for over three years, with no case brought to court, and several judges offering plea bargains. How did they even justify the plea bargains? "Oh, you're in prison for no reason so here's a plea bargain for random crimes we've made up?" If the district attorney's office is so busy, why does someone need to stay in prison for that? Like, you're supposably busy, but he has to stay in prison because you're busy?

Every single one of those judges, district attorneys, police officers, correctional officers, and prison administration should face penalties.

Edit: And it turns out that that place is not even a prison. It's a holding facility for people who are awaiting trials and other court actions, i.e., innocent people.
Fugees' rapper Pras Michel convicted in foreign influence case
Looking at your post history I suspect we are culturally not that different. That culture certainly seems like it helped (discouraging dating when young, getting and staying married, having children which creates motivation, etc).

White Americans don’t “choose their own to advance.” People from my part of the world, and yours, are way more likely to favor their own ethnic groups.
The delay is pending an appeal. A previous ruling on the appeal found that she was unlikely to win a new trial, so sentencing date was set. Appealing that resulted in a more optimistic finding.

It may not last for long, and in any case will merely delay the day she gets out. Her co-conspirator went the same route, was denied, and has started his sentence.

But ya, it sure feels like 'leniency for thee and not for me'
> I never realized that just choosing not to show up was an option.

At least around here, it seems to happen a lot to violent offenders who aren't rich. There was a guy a few months ago who committed an armed robbery. Reached a plea to get it turned into an attempted robbery. He simply stopped showing up to court dates (both for the armed robbery and a separate theft case) and was out on his own for months, until he stabbed an innocent woman to death[1]. Just a few weeks ago one of the guys who shot a Washington Commanders player absconded, and it doesn't seem like anyone cares.

[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/04/04/ivy-city-...
[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/04/05/commander...
I recently gave a talk on this and agree. While it was fun to learn, the difference between oauth and oidc isn't clear. Especially with what I've been referring to as oidc "wave 2" - machine to machine authentication without OAuth seemingly involved at all.

https://youtu.be/nW3xK6sh1Ck
I think "airplane cockpit" is an exaggeration. Sure early 2000's Mercedeses even had a phone keypad[1], because, hey, everyone needed that front and center, but by around 2010 most manufacturers figured out iDrive-style interfaces (maybe a better name would be iPod-style menus with a scroll wheel you click to enter submenus)

[1] https://s1.cdn.autoevolution.com/images/gallery/MERCEDESBENZ...
Google contractors vote to unionize in historic landslide election
OAuth is typically meant for a user (resource owner) to delegate some authorizations on a protected resource to a client. If your headless system is trying to hit an API with authorizations granted by particular users, you'll need some way for the users to grant that access.

But the client credential flow assumes the client _is_ a resource owner and already has authorizations to do its business. Thats what you would typically use for pure system-to-system use cases, and basically amounts to "hit this endpoint periodically to get the current API key"
Then you just get fancy regression formulas. With enough layers and "bars", epicycles "work" in terms of predictive power. It's usually better to find out the underlying mechanism rather than merely satisfy prediction. Otherwise we'd still be using epicycles. Plus, gravity theory has Occam's Razor over epicycles.
> it means the model licensor has a claim against you

Right, but to what end? The only reason the licensor should care one way or another is the licensor being held liable for what folks do with the software, in which case...

> it also means, and this is probably more important, that in some juridictions, the model licensor has a better defense against liability for contributory infringement if the licensee infringes.

Do hardware stores need to demand "thou shalt not use this tool to kill people" to their customers to avoid liability for axe murders under such jurisdictions? Or car manufacturers needing to specify "you will not use this product to run over schoolchildren at crosswalks"?

Like, I'm sure such jurisdictions exist, but I somehow doubt license terms in an EULA nobody (except for us nerds) will ever read would be sufficient in such a kangaroo court.

(EDIT: also, I'm pretty sure the standard warranty disclaimer in your average FOSS license already covers this, without making the software nonfree in the process)
That is true but the problem is that the class of people that maintain and profit off of the brutal prison pipeline are the same ones that get to go to Club Fed if they get into trouble. It's a horrible double standard.
Exactly, why would anyone show up on time then?
Every time I'm setting up a new PC, I check the prices on RAM and then check the benchmarks for actual usage, and I always seem to find that buying faster RAM is not a good use of the budget, especially because I need a PC with a lot of RAM.

Currently running a 12900k with DDR4 RAM.

When I checked the benchmarks, DDR4 ended up being about 3% slower than the fastest DDR5 which was more than double the price, which for 64Gb was a significant price increase. Even less difference for gaming, something like 1%.

https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i9-12900k-alde...

I'm sure it's a similar story for the different speeds of DDR5. The price premium isn't worth the tiny increase in speed. I guess people see the big numbers like 4800 vs 5600 and assume that means it's that much faster, 17%, when in reality it's something like 1-2%.

Faster RAM has always been a ripoff, and like you said you're risking stability issues. https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/ddr5_core_i9_13900k_dd...
Instead of investing in large projects meant to satisfy large numbers of stakeholders for all their needs anticipated out decades into the future, instead focus on maintaining a development pipeline with steady stream of smaller, narrowly focused projects where the design requirements are locked down early. If you plan from the get go on developing something new every 5 years, it's not a big deal to say "let's save that for the next iteration" and you can incorporate both new developments and lessons learned. You also naturally get people working on these projects who have worked on other similar projects before, so you don't need to reinvent the wheel like you do when there's a 40 year gap between iterations.

We see excellent examples of this kind of project management in the automotive, semiconductor, and consumer electronics industries.
No, we already know she's going to a camp/minimum, which is significantly less punitive than a low. They're work program oriented, structured like dormitories and have no fencing. You leave every day to do work program then come back to the facility to sleep.

A low security federal prison pretty much meets your expectations of what a prison is minus the gang activity.

Do yourself a favor and google image search for "FPC Bryan" if you want an idea of what her stay will look like.
I feel like everyone just overlooked the prisoners working at McDonalds portion of your comment. Where does that occur?
https://www.nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-we-protect/your-right...

"Workplace conditions" is protected similarly to wages.
Scott Alexander made a bet with those prompts here: https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/a-guide-to-asking-robo...

And followed up with this article when he won the bet: https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/i-won-my-three-year-ai...
Ruby has also improved single-threaded performance and introduced a parallelism construct, so, while it is still far from fast, the basic performance and scaling situation has improved somewhat.
It seems like this is all duration risk coming home to roost. Some banks (svb) made poor risk management decisions (going long too long) while having flighty deposits, while the Fed should’ve talked to FDIC when they were preparing to rocket the benchmark rate to step in sooner (to backstop them) when the value of these assets were going to quickly deteriorate due to the speed at which the Fed was going to move. Admittedly, it’s easy to Monday Morning quarterback, hindsight is 20/20, all that.
Via representative government. Even promoted by Lenin himself.
Do you think the other inmates are all rich too?
I think the release cadence can be a double edged sword for viewer retention.

Certainly with Wheel of Time I felt that there was a few weak\boring episodes in a row and I hit the point where I dropped it, for me wasn't worth waiting a full week to see if quality of subsequent episodes improved.

If there had of been a buffer of episodes available I could probably power through the bad episodes until the show picked up again but with weekly release cadence it just caused me to give up on it.
If you were generally comparing standards: yes. Documentation with it is a breeze.

If you're talking about a "replace one standard with the next" type of comparison, then no. You can read more about why here https://oauth.net/webauthn/
Lol. That's like the arguments used back in the 80's or 90's against saturated fat, where the biased literature funded by the sugar industry produced commercials of people running cold water over lard to show that it remained solid hence clogged arteries.

Saturated fat is only solid at room temperature, not biological temperature. Put a tablespoon of coconut oil or butter in your mouth and see how it melts.
More importantly, our body makes saturated fat. It's part of every cell's membrane. The science on which fats are good for us is still being debated, but I think the overall consensus so far is somewhat as follows: animal fats have more toxins (such as dioxins), and tend to come with cholesterol; non-animal fats are cleaner (whether saturated coconut oil or unsaturated types). Consuming too much fat blunts insulin sensitivity, but consuming too many carbs does likewise but in different ways. Carbs seem to be the bigger villain, but trans fats and low quality [rancid] oils are bad too. Having a good omega-3:6 ratio is anti-inflammatory and good for us. Eat lots of non-starchy vegetables, plenty of high quality protein, and reduce sugar consumption.

Data has been coming out over the past decade on how all the unsaturated fat touted as healthy is actually harmful, as it disrupts our hormone balance and increases inflammation. On the other hand, saturated fats are good for hormone balance, but I definitely wouldn't go out of my way to eat bacon or other high-toxin saturated fat. I'll just stick to the basics as stated in the previous paragraph.