skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Article is referencing another[0] which mentions "grounded" but not "indefinitely" and doesn't cite its sources.

The only thing cited (in this article) is:

> An anomaly occurred during the ascent and prior to stage separation resulting in a loss of the vehicle. No injuries or public property damage have been reported. The FAA will oversee the mishap investigation of the Starship / Super Heavy test mission.”

Which is normal - I'd expect nothing less. You'd be crazy to allow further flights (of anything) until you have a full understanding of what happened.

But of course, that doesn't have the same nice sting as "grounded indefinitely".

[0] https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/20/spacex-starship-exp...
> rush to launch

Was there some specific reason for the rush beyond "ha ha funny date"? _If_ they did have some sort of solution almost ready to go, seems perplexing not to wait for it.
Right, learning many languages is subject to diminishing returns. European languages look barely distinguishable to me, so learning them would be a waste of time.
What "Osvianskina"? Google thinks I am misspelling something when I search for it.
Yes. Say today the mouse engages in 3 behaviors (groom, walk around edge of enclosure, then dart across it) but tomorrow spends the whole day huddled in the corner (1 behavior, not exhibited yesterday). That’s sort of what they mean by within mouse variability.
I don't believe you. I'm sure a couple of examples of this exist, but they're the exception, and certainly not a case of "more and more".
Nonsense.

We went to the moon in 1969. The last moon landing was 1973.

The world population in 1969 was 3,625,680,627 [0]

The world population in 2020 was 2020 7,794,798,739 [0]

Today's world population is 8,029,731,569 [1]

We've more than doubled the world population in the 50 years since the last moon landing and no country has ever yet made it back.

Using your argument, I can unequivocally say that more people is bad.

In 1969, there were 324.23 ppm carbon in the atmosphere. Today, there are 416.43 ppm carbon in the atmosphere. [1] This does not even count species mass extinction, other pollution, etc. Even in 1969, there were sufficiently massive real environmental damage concerns to create the EPA within the same presidential administration.

This also does not even mention the massive resource constraints and conflicts that inevitably arise with overpopulation. this includes oil, water, lithium, rare-earth minerals, and possibly most important, phosphorus, which is rapidly running out, and when it does, the entire agriculture industry that feeds the current overpopulation will crash, along with the human population.

Humans would thrive with something like 1/8 of the population, especially with the level of technology, and will continue to advance.

Just consider that a miniscule 6.7% of people have a college degree [2]. That provides something resembling an upper limit on the set of people actively contributing to technological advancement. Interestingly enough, double that is about 1/8 of the population.

The view that "some is good, more is better" is just... to be kind, massively simplistic and wrong.

[0] https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-populat...

[1] https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/

[2] https://educateinspirechange.org/how-many-people-of-the-worl...
Same (or slightly improved) models, different data from the records of the next N years.
Until humans come up with a better way of building software, something like TDD seems to be the best way to build correct software.

Keep in mind though that tests are also software built by humans that can be wrong too, sometimes giving you false confidence about correctness.

The best test of a system is always real-world usage.
>They’ve clearly used and reproduced his content without a license.

Where have they reproduced his content?

You don't need a license for your fair use of something. Can you walk me through how downloading a photo to your personal computer and studying it, perhaps to become a better artist is copyright infringement? Now let's apply that analogy to training a model, is the process of using a particular image to train a model, ultimately reconfiguring a bunch of weights in a matrix, so it "learns" whatever particulars it learns, copyright infringement? Is training a painting monkey that may paint something similar to a copyrighted painting, on a copyrighted painting, copyright infringement?
> Article from 2020.

So.. an article from 2020 references the quarterly safety report for Q4/2022?

You might want to check your dates.
The post wasn't loading for me because my DNS was blocking it for it being newly-registered, so I decided to post the archive link in case someone else had the same issue.
This seems like business as usual. Am I missing something here?
Windows was always a parody compared with VMS and other OSs.

What was exactly his role at MS compared with his role at DEC ?
Geforce now ultimate tier has lower latentcy than a local console.
I take it you find something wrong with these requirements? They look roughly "correct" to my eye.

Experience in field... Can't teach something you don't know yourself]

Experience with educational pedagogies... Some background in education is good

Recruiting for graduate programs... sure, sounds like a thing a uni would want

Teaching diverse student body... this is an urban uni with a large non-white population (25% Black, 30% Hispanic) and massive number of first-generation college students (45%).

Experience teaching remote, hybrid, etc.... that's a requirement in 2023
Ok so talk about the median that should be sufficient. I think average is appropriate here because the outliers are rare. Not many people rack up 200k in debt with nothing to show for it. Apart from extremely pricey art institute degrees (whose absolute numbers are low) I don't see an issue.

Median debt is $20k. Avg debt is $37k. The college wage premium is about 30k. A new car is $45k.
Windfarm generation Dashboard in Ireland and Northern Ireland: https://www.smartgriddashboard.com
I don't really understand what your issue is. This is specifically looking for someone interested in CS Education/Pedagogy (i.e. the science of teaching Computer Science), as opposed to a specialist/researcher in a particular CS topic (e.g. distributed systems, mchine learning etc).
Thanks for pointing it out. I've updated it.
Real estate has licensing requirements, a national association you kinda need to participate in (MLS) and tons of regulatory requirements. I can't just wake up tomorrow and sell real estate.
The C equivalent would be a bunch of `in_addr`/`sockaddr_in`/`sockaddr` handling where you can do something wrong at basically every step of the way. You can't mess up the types in Rust, there's only one way they fit together.

Of course if you just want to convert a string to a SocketAddr (returning an error at runtime if it's invalid), you just do `let addr = "127.0.0.1:8080".parse();`.
The FAA should be investigating itself for allowing the launch at all. No flame trench for the most powerful rocket of all time? The launch pad destruction was so severe that it destroyed the rocket's own engines and damaged cars half a mile away.
I'm not sure what the disk encryption story is in Google Cloud but I'd rather it didn't end up on Ebay. Mind you, "flooded" covers a wide range of possibilities and a surprisingly small amount of water ingress would trip a breaker while leaving the racks in good order.
Unsurprising, but they wouldn't be able to launch another anyway anytime soon, as their first one destroyed the launchpad.

Not having a trench and sound suppression was, unsurprisingly, a mistake, and the lack of those may have caused the crash in the first place.

And I doubt the water-cooled steel base would be much better at anything but preventing chunks of concrete from hitting the engines and their support systems.
Here the Russia experts interpret this to be a classical case of беспредел, bespredel [1]. They also reiterate that the actions are against the international law and will have consequences for Russia and its economy for decades to come. What they left out is the public's criticism that the business risks were never properly understood or taken into account in the first place.

[1] https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/bespredel-and-the-cond...
Predicting when an algorithmic problem will be solved is a fools game. I don’t think Musk was intending to deceive with FSD, he’s just wildly over optimistic and partially blinded by the financial upside.

That being said, just because they have repeatedly failed to predict when “FSD” will be solved, doesn’t mean they aren’t making progress. I’ve been very happy with their latest v11 release, it’s drives so freaking smoothly on the highway.
NNs are basically working as a kind of laundromat for digital artifacts. They replace a single copy operation with a multiple transform operations all leading to the same intended result. I wonder how soon we would see NNs which can produce bit perfect copy of the trained dataset on demand. And after that where will we draw the line? Imagine a NN which produces bit perfect copy of the image and then changes 1 pixel in it to make it different. Is it an original art? No? Well, what if we change 2 pixels then? Still not original? What about 3 pixels?..

The amount of popcorn to be consumed watching all these fancy new legal battles will be astronomical :)
No. I feel like I wasted my time reading that. I fell for the click bait.
Does this mean that until now, they did experiments only on male mice?
Imagine it being 2023 and you are asking for more animals to torture. We should be demanding advancements in computational chemistry and biology, in vitro methods, and synthetic biology. Minor scientific advancements should not come at the expense of sentient creatures.
True for larger companies, but a whole bunch of SMBs use Google Workspace, and some larger players have both subscriptions.
> Yeah but you look really weird trying to give this email in person or over the phone.

I really don't care about that. If anyone questions it I'm honest: “it lets me filter messages into folders/tags so I can prioritise easily, and it lets me easily block your company if it sends too much or sell my details on”. I once had someone (an in-physical-store “signup and we'll send you some vouchers” deal) refuse to accept such an address to which my response was “Fair enough, but if you won't take that I'm not signing up, you aren't getting other contact details out of me”. Other than that one example I've had no trouble in this regard, the only other significant reactions I've had being something along the lines of “I might have to start doing that”.

Never let commercial interests embarrass or guilt you into behaving in their favour!

I used a sub-domain for the catch all which has one or twice over the years caused an issue due to bad validation, not liking the extra “.” unless it is near the end like in .co.uk, at which point I step away because a company that can't deal with a perfectly valid email address domain part probably can't store anything securely!

> Most stuff that comes from email leaks gets caught but the spam filter already.

It isn't just leaks, it is when the company itself sends too much or gives your details to its parent/child/partner companies (most likely there was a non-optional, or at least default-on, checkbox that give them permission to do this). That sort of thing is less likely to be caught by general spam filters, though admittedly the volume or that is likely rather lower so the irritation likewise.
Lots of things here are no longer true. For example FSD does work on the highway now not just city streets. Also note this is written on Fobes’s contributor aka blog platform also known for pumping crypto schemes and other nonsense points of view under the banner of “opinion” pieces from people who have no affiliation with Forbes.

I’d guess we are seeing this here today because someone decided it was a good day to FUD the company so they can make a buck shorting the stock.

Bottom line, Teslas are incredible cars and most people that have bad things to say about them seem to never have owned one.
This is still a very shaky ticket to bet on. Yes, the new crop of AI tools promises a lot of productivity gains, but for now they also need well-educated folks to operate them and integrate their output, and we don't quite know what the reliance of AI will do to peoples' educational interest/drive, etc. There might well be an overall downward spiral and loss of operating knowledge lurking there.
"who don’t actually like to program, or who have very staunch/stagnant attitudes."

Were those in the comment? Seems these would be more than just enjoying learning and growing.

I might be getting there now. That wasn't the case in the past. Office politics and poor management ruined me early in my career. I'm just a burnt out low performer now. I have seen many others who also fall into the category of enjoying learning and growing (and higher performing than I was) who are not making $150k. Remeber, the national median dev salary is about $110k. So most devs by definition are making substantially less than the numbers claimed. I guarantee many of them also enjoy learning and growing.
Ingestion / a Manhattan Project
At least in the US it wasn't even about monopolies, but about whether or not a merger would negatively affect competition. [1] But at some point it feels like the FTC simply stopped enforcing its own guidelines, at least when large enough players were involved. Because it's somewhat self evident that the overwhelmingly majority of big corp mergers over the past couple of decades have completely crippled competition.

That said, I think this indirectly feeds off your core point - this 'new direction' of the FTC is almost certainly because these companies have become far too 'influential' owing to their size and power. I think one could even generalize a simple test: "Would the immediate collapse of this company meaningfully imperil the US economy, security, or other significant interests?" If so, that company needs to be split up until the answer is no.

[1] - https://www.ftc.gov/advice-guidance/competition-guidance/gui...
There is also an article by The Daily Beast [1]

Which highlights this:

'Users dug up an October 2020 tweet from Musk in which he posted that SpaceX wouldn’t build a flame diverter on the launchpad, but acknowledged that “it could turn out to be a mistake.”'

How much it would have cost to build a flame diverter?

[1]: https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-faa-grounds-starship-after...
It’s not quite business as usual due to the alarming and unexpected amount of possibly toxic dust that spread all throughout that area of the state, as noted on the article.
"Imagine being a part of a new kind of community where you can co-create with like-minded individuals. Unleash your creativity and collaborate, design, vote, and bring your creative vision to life."

Yeah, imagine that. No one's ever imagined that before.
Someone found a case of "Squid Game"...
Not surprising.

I'm from Germany and all my mother watches these days are Korean dramas on Netflix.

She tells me that, in contrast to Western productions, they show more feelings and are less "cold" when interacting with each other.
> I don’t think Musk was intending to deceive with FSD, he’s just wildly over optimistic

When he does it year after year after year it's no longer "optimism", it's just bullshit and lies.
How did my company found out that I shared confidential information online?
I mistakenly shared configuration file of sth of my company in stackoverflow/reddit. My company found out immediately and fired me. How did they find out? Was it by looking at stackoverflow/reddit? I put them on pastebin and shared. AFAIK, pastebin isn't indexed by google. So,how would they know it? I'm really curious about the infrastructure in companies to figure these stuffs.
Debug vs. Release Builds Considered Harmful
SpaceX is more than Elon Musk.
If it is grounded without a specified end time, isn't it grounded indefinitely?
You need to upgrade /s
Eh. I'd look at it a little differently.

We need both engineering and arts/culture in society. And it behooves us that those who produce arts and culture are educated to a higher level in their disciplines.

The Western capitalist system isn't set up to compensate arts/culture (at least outside of lowest-denominator, mass-market stuff).

Consequently, we explicitly create government transfer systems to fund these. Hard economic activity -> profit -> taxes -> funding for arts/culture

If we want to live in a capitalist society, that seems like a fair setup. There are alternative economic systems that fund arts/culture in different ways, which generally aren't as successful on the whole as capitalism.

Are there excesses and easy dead-horse majors to beat in arts/culture? Absolutely.

But part of progress is exploring ideas that seem silly, crazy, or anathema to people at one point. Individual rights and land ownership? Democracy? Universal sufferage?

Everything seems preordained, looking backwards through history. Looking forward, it often seems radical or stupid.
The sentence easily read as calling consumers of streams "delinquents", and that's how I had read it. Because the verb "to stream" can be used to refer to both the server and client, same as "pirate" refers to both distributor and consumer. I had definitely read it as them calling the viewers of soccer streams being delinquents and pirates, since no further context was given.

This was my point -- the actual context isn't explained until the very end. And even then, it doesn't unambiguously clarify who is being attacked at the top.
I guess I'm wrong then. Apologies. Who am I to argue with whatever you decide is objective truth.

> "The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command... and if all others accepted the lie, which the party imposed, if all records told the same tale, then the lie passed into history and became truth"
> People will probably always eat a lot of cow,

This is probably not true, vegan meat is progressing very fast (and once it matures has the potential to be much cheaper) and lowering the consumption of meat is important to reduce carbon emissions. I expect that demand for meat will sharply shrink in the next century
And that's not what's being discussed here.

What we are discusing is the distorted view in the original comment. The original comment was comparing the top earners of one field to the median earners for another. It would be better to compare the medians. For example median dev salary is about $110k. Median physician salary is about $205k. So no, these are not comparably paying jobs. And one does not "easily" earn more than a physician simply by enjoying learning.
The last flight license literally had a clause that said "Valid for one flight only."

Starship is grounded regardless, and most definitely not 'indefinitely' in the same sense that your mother tells you 'no more candy until I say so.'
Probably useful for people doing web stories.

https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/enable-...
I think Flutter’s potential is being and will continue to be dampened greatly by Dart. It doesn’t matter how good Dart is or how similar it becomes to other languages, it still has unique quirks and an ecosystem to be learned which makes it in the minds of most too much trouble for what’s realistically a single-use language.

The only reason anybody bothers with Apple’s similarly restricted-usage languages is because they open up access to a whole set of platforms as well as a set of frameworks so wide and deep (Cocoa/Cocoa Touch) that it’s practical to develop a highly quality polished app with them without bringing in any third party dependencies, which I don’t think Flutter will ever be able to do.
> But would Japan be Japan when Japanese culture is replaced by an admixture of foreign cultures?

Is Japan of 1950 also Japan of 2050? Its a sort of ship-of-Theseus issue, but when we recognize that cultures evolve, grow, mix, adapt, and continually become something wonderful, it's less of a concern in my mind.

> Tibetans are better off with the lesser dictatorship of the CCP over the theocracy of a Dalai Lama.

Oof, I doubt this is anywhere close to true given the treatment of minority groups under CCP policy. Sovereignty, forcibly taken, is rarely an improvement and is detrimental both to the people whose sovereignty was taken and to the people who took the sovereignty. Much better to engage in economic trade and diplomacy.
If you were a visiting alien and saw one species that covers itself almost entirely in living organisms of a different kingdom, walks around, is protected from wind and UV radiation, and helps maintain thermal equilibrium, what characteristics would determine whether that was "clothing" versus "symbiosis"?
>I don't see why there would be more unused disposed cow skin than prior

If the "vegan" product suddenly attains a real value other than "being vegan", for instance self repair, it may decrease the demand for regular old leather.
I must say, at the very least, I find the contrast is rather funny.

New organisations were parroting SpaceX's euphemism of a “rapid unscheduled disassembly”, to the extent there was a headline saying it was “actually good news”[1]. Whilst there will be lessons learnt, and it’s obviously not easy to launch rockets, this doesn’t scream unequivocally good news.

[1] https://www.fastcompany.com/90885149/spacexs-rapid-unschedul...
The pain I went through to stop The Economist has made me reluctant to subscribe to anything too - and I run a subscription publication business. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that this approach hurts revenue overall.
Thanks for sharing! I'm looking to add more countries to the map so I'll dig into the data behind this one.
Maybe like Climate, we set a baseline. Countries agree to a target year (like 1850, or 1960 or whatever and they all agree to take steps to stabilize at those levels with the proviso that there is no forced abortions like the CCP but instead the approach of education, birth control and in places like Japan subsidies to promote stability of population level.
We do need to make better use of humans that's for sure.

Organ donation rates are still pretty poor and funeral practices in the west are needlessly inhibitory to decomposition.

There's been rumours of human leather forever, I reckon some people would quite like to be a jacket or suitcase!
Exactly. People love uniqueness of cultures etc — but if there’s tons of mixing due to trying to hit “growth” standards of the modern capitalist world… every nation will end up the same mix of random people. Losing culture and replacing it with mono-consumerism.
I don't think culture is "replaced" in any country that we've seen extended immigration too.
> Tesla — time to accept this gauntlet. Provide real data, comparing the same thing in the same situation.

Do other manufacturers provide the granular data being requested here? This feels like someone looking for a reason to single Tesla out, for obvious reasons: Tesla headlines get clicks.
30k±1 = 6x±1 where x = 5k and so on. Why use four formulas when one will suffice?
I wonder what the variation looks like in social behaviors across hormonal states.
From a strict reading of the words, Starship was to be grounded "indefinitely" regardless of the outcome of the launch.

The launch license was for only 1 launch. They need to get another one to launch again, which will take an indeterminate amount of time, and isn't technically guaranteed to ever be granted.
> Doesn't the free market also gives you mid-range furniture options as well as high end wood workers that'll build anything you're willing to pay for?

The free market apparently gives you cardboard furniture at mid-range prices or custom built furniture that non-1% earners wouldn't even dream of affording, and not much inbetween.

$2700 dresser? No thanks.

The "reasonable" option is buying second-hand solid wood furniture on Craigslist and thrift stores in the ~$500-700 range.