skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Today, thought leaders casually opine on how and where ML will be useful, and MBAs feel like this is an acceptable substitute for expert opinion.

Sounds like standard operating procedure.
They could have done smart things like telling you have hit the stream limit at a key moment in a show - perhaps 10 mins from the end. When you really don't want to just say 'nah, I'll watch the rest another day when I'm not at the stream limit'.
Sure. But again, that's not why copyright was invented. The application of your terms is based on the same "I own ideas" meme that Disney used to increase their ownership of movies and characters pretty much indefinitely for decades.

In my opinion you are both wrong. You agree with Disney on a premise that I reject.

Attribution should imo be covered by some other law. It's a different thing. It's lying about facts.
Are there after-school programs that have "Singapore math" or similar in the US?

I've seen the Russian School of Mathematics and I wonder if there are other "foreign" style of math education. If so, I would consider enrolling my future children.

When I grew up, I was enrolled in a bilingual school in middle-school. So I took math in Spanish (following the Mexican curriculum), and in English (following the US curriculum). I thought that was fantastic not because one or other was better (I can't recall) but because it gave different approaches to the same topics.
> adjusted for location/COL

Isn't the majority of COL housing? Of course, with a mortgage, you actually build equity into an asset (the house) that you can later resell.

From my experience, SV caliber devs command SV comp pretty much worldwide.
ChatGPT was based on GPT3, which was released in 2020. The fundamental advance appears to have been InstructGPT which was 2022. GPT4 was 2023, three years after version 3. Id expect to see GPT5 sometime in 2026.
If my math doesn't fail me that's almost an order of magnitude lower than 256MB/s. :D

I'm suprised I got so close with my back of the napkin calculation.

But what would you consider reasonable data usage for 10K users? Is it maybe possible that a technology that's trying to demonopolyse social networks is probably not optimised for high user counts on individual servers?
Why? To me semaphores are the thing you can use to implement a counting producer/consumer thing, a mutex, a critical section, a flag for an interrupt handler.

Are you referring specifically to a counting semaphore as opposed to the other things?
None of these are even remotely close to terraforming.
Seems the likelihood isn't the same. AWS is separating AZs physically, GCP is not. I'd want to know this as a customer, not some abstraction.
I'm over the moon for these chips ready, but next year Strix APUs are going to be mind blowing. Leaks have been calling them Ryzen 8000 series but I would not be surprised if they become new Z chips. https://www.notebookcheck.net/Massive-AMD-Ryzen-8000-Zen-5-l...

Strix Point is 15-45W, Strix Halo is 20-120W. Halo with unified 256-bit LPDDR5X, for some m.2 style awesomeness albeit not on package. This is like the APU rebirth of a Threadripper, an ultra high bandwidth monster... Not the same HDET market ("only" 16 cores) but just an absolute monstrously capable chip none the less.

20-120W! That's some scaling. I really think people drastically underestimate how good modern chips can be at powerscaling down. Right off the bat with the first Epyc, Matthew Dillon of DragonflyBSD was testing power down performance & seeing chips run crazy fast at 65w and below. Multi-chip Infinity Fabric is a bit of a new damper for now, but it too will scale down & improve. The ability to turn off a couple cores, to clock down, to drop. Voltages is ultra compelling for gaming decks like this, to be great when plugged in, but fierce as needed.

I can't wait to see how compact cooling becomes a competitive advantage. By 2030 I fully expect we'll have 75W+ decks that throttle way down on battery but absolutely tear it up when plugged in.

Hopefully more and more of these systems run a mean Linux too! This Asus is very tempting but man I wouldn't go near Windows at this point & don't trust them on Linux. After years of trying to make Steam Box a thing, sharing the tech, I'm not sure how much of the Deck OS is available for reuse, don't know how far beyond install arch, setup some drivers, start in Big Picture mode they went (supposedly big picture mode is getting more like Deck mode which implies a more complicated scenario). Very interested in the Deck OS future here.

A bunch of comments yesterday on these Z1 chips if you missed it, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35709096
"hackernews is more of a news feed with a comment section than a social network"

The "more of... than" makes this sound less absolute.

HN is not a social network. It is (probably) a public forum used to aggregate news and foster conversation.
Yes, but "Dark" (Netflix) doesn't have a lot of words spoken per hour, as I recall, so perhaps it's not so good for language learning. There's also "Beat" (Amazon) with a somewhat gruesome main storyline.

If you wanted to get linguistically flummoxed there's "Capitani" on Netflix. (A great story, but it's in Luxembourgish!)
Those users won’t be affected by password sharing restrictions. The implementation details take into consideration those scenarios.
GrapheneOS supports LTE-only mode for that purpose: https://grapheneos.org/usage#lte-only-mode

> This feature is not intended to improve the confidentiality of traditional calls and texts, but it might somewhat raise the bar for some forms of interception. It's not a substitute for end-to-end encrypted calls / texts or even transport layer encryption. LTE does provide basic network authentication / encryption, but it's for the network itself. The intention of the LTE-only feature is only hardening against remote exploitation by disabling an enormous amount of both legacy code (2G, 3G) and bleeding edge code (5G).
It works short term to attract new subscriptions, which is what counted until last year.

Let's say you aren't alone in your subscription situation, to put it mildly.
I know that at least Star Trek: The Next Generation and the Golden Girls accepted freelance scripts. You can sometimes find the submission guidelines for Star Trek: The Next Generation on fan sites. You can also tell if this is the case for a show by looking at the writers. If there are lots of writers who only wrote one or two episodes, the show probably took submissions.

All the old books about television script writing I've read are about submitting in this way, but by the time I was actually considering it episodic television was rapidly dying out.
I think there is a new project from the Postgres community. They try to replace the storage engine to solve the inefficiency caused by MVCC

https://github.com/orioledb/orioledb
Idiocracy has a purely genetic premise. I'm saying even that isn't strongly hereditary. Cultural heredity even less so.
Finding the right wording and constraints to include is incredibly important when you’re submitting prompts through the API. The results have to be repeatable and conform to a template in order to be usable. Doubly so when using 3.5 which isn’t as good at guessing your intent. 3.5 is the only option for those without API access to 4 or for frequent or large requests that would cost a lot if using 4.
Dispersing more spores, from a higher altitude, so they go further?
Interestingly there were, I think, 3 companies working on similar projects at the time (including TM) - the others didn't make it to market (mostly due to the dot-com bust and the sudden drop in available funding).

A lot of the IP that people had to create involved getting around Intel's patents, some of which were both basic and likely bogus (prior art etc) but Intel was widely seen as having far more lawyers than anyone could afford so taking them on directly was best avoided

Not really mentioned in this article was TM's biggest score at the time, which was getting Linus to come work for them
100%.

The combination of "this problem has clear winners" and "anyone can veto any change, but no one can veto the status quo" makes for entrenched, powerful interests.

I suspect that it is particularly bad in the US because our insane vetocracy.
If I sold you a digital camera, would you be surprised if I was uploading every picture you took to my servers? (Without telling you, of course.) Your blasé reaction is rather worrying.
Considering how many companies Disney has been acquiring. It is absolutely the right choice.
I tried to convince my son to try the spotify premium which is currently 3 months free trial.
He said he does not need another service on top of YouTube premium and Apple Music even if it’s free.
He’s not wrong.
I’m not sure how a music only service can survive on its own- I often switch between videoclips, songs, podcasts with video or not, all on YouTube. Another app/service for just some of these things is not convenient.
So piracy gives you the best UI. Sure. But why do you believe your need for the best UI is enough to clear the bar for ethics when it comes to violating other people's IP rights? Stealing food from the store is way more convenient than going through the line. Best UI there is for grocery shopping.
Since we go for anecdata - I work for a FAANG, and I am the youngest person on my team in my late 20s. Half the team is above 40, the other half is above 30. Some of the people from both age groups were hired after I got hired (in the past 2 years).
More recently a small plane landed on Lake Shore Drive: https://abc7chicago.com/lake-shore-drive-plane-crash-lands-o...
You broke the site guidelines egregiously and repeatedly in this thread. Doing that will get you banned on HN. Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35717960.
Nice share
It's a turd, if you want poor security you should make things so complicated that half the implementers have no idea what they are doing. We should have a kind of LD50 for specs: How much feature cruft do you need for 50% of the test subjects to die.
> As the sibling comments says, the USA has far more immigration than, well, anywhere in the world.

By total numbers, probably. As a % of population, I don't think the US comes even close to the top. Probably even Canada and other North American countries have a even higher percentage, so it doesn't even have the most in North America.
It was a ZIRP thing
> LinkedIn

There’s a lot of precedent here showing scrapping isn’t guaranteed to be acceptable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook,_Inc._v._Power_Ventur....

$79,640.50 in compensatory damages + $39,796.73 discovery sanction

I could go on, but I am not sure what exactly you’re trying to argue here.
I think they would have done well to allow many people to share an account, but require all users watch the same thing at the same time, and play and pause in sync.

The fact you're sometimes being forced to watch something you didn't really want to watch, and forced to negotiate with your friend/neighbour over when exactly toilet breaks are going to happen, would lead to lots of users deciding it isn't worth the hassle and they'll subscribe themselves.
I still reach for semaphores (and mutexs) given how simple it is to check an atomic counter. In addition to the linked article (https://lwn.net/Articles/844224/), are their other good articles on moving to more performant locking or coordination mechanisms?
"Launch fast and break things."
> it's like being upset that Google Search is aware of websites you visited in Chrome. Is it unethical for that to be the case?

Yes. It's unethical in both cases.
I was going to ask what you think "LDL" cholesterol means with regard to its actual fractional measurement instead of calculated volumetric level, but then I decided you seemed content with your worldview and it wasn't really disturbing me personally.

As I get older, I find more enjoyment using my magnifying glass for discovery than burning
>Why though? Why don't you just watch some other content? There's so much out there, and you have so many choices, available without any ads, and also if you choose you can consume free content as well.

Because that content isn't this content, and I want to see this content.

>Given that you have these alternatives, why do you feel you have the right to nonetheless violate IP laws because you don't like that a subset of content carries ads or restrictions?

First, see above - that content isn't this content, so if there's not a suitable alternative, well, c'est la vie. I've demonstrated that I'm willing to pay for these things, albeit to a point. If the service goes beyond that point, and I still want the content, then I'll obtain it via other means. Besides, much of the specific content I'm referring to in this scenario rakes in massive profits every quarter and is doing quite well for itself regardless of whether or not I "violate IP laws" to obtain it. That's setting aside the fact that it's been shown that piracy doesn't harm sales[1]. Further, in spite of our pirating, we'll still often inject money back towards the IP via other means.

[1]https://gizmodo.com/the-eu-suppressed-a-300-page-study-that-...
I have been loving newsboat; RSS FTW.
Not you, the larger community.

My original comment was at -3 when I said that.
This is a fair point. I think another point about this is how someone is socialized or raised by their parents. It could be that people from higher socioeconomic backgrounds value PhD work more so than others so they are more likely to attempt to do it.

I don't really see the point in making the claim that there is some kind of bias against people from poorer backgrounds. It just inflames things. Maybe people from poorer backgrounds prefer to seek jobs with higher salaries.
Imagine you decide to go 'soul searching', bought up a sizable chunk of land, packed up on goods, gave away everything else, and decided to just live off your land for a couple of years. By the time you got back to society, you'd probably find that "your" land was no longer yours. Unless you decided to stop what you were doing, go earn some USD, and give it to the government - they would seize your land. So it's really no different than rent.

Incidentally this is not inherent. If tax were assessed in some way like min(5%_of_disposable_income, assessed_property_tax) then I think there'd be a much stronger argument of ownership, in spite of the fact that in the vast majority of scenarios there would be exactly 0 difference. But take our little scenario above. Just want to check out of society for a bit? You'd be absolutely free to do so, and when you came back your land would would still be your land. In fact it would never be taken from you except in some scenario where you broke the law, such as by tax evasion.
You can write your prompts in code or formal logic or whatever if you want, assuming you’re capable of expressing your meaning sufficiently clearly with those languages too.
Cool to see windfarm discussion here. I live in the PNW, love where I live but I have a ton of trees so my solar eligible square footage is pretty modest when juxtaposed to my goals of getting off grid. I recently found out that home turbines are a thing, and I'm hoping with a combination of the two I can achieve my goals. That said, we have no data for this sort of thing, so I'm in the domain of a blind investment. I'd love to hear feedback if folks have experience.
> For example, you simply cannot teach Newton's laws of motion without knowing what a derivative is.

You absolutely can do that. You might now want to, but you can, and people do.
Yes, it's actually pretty common. See comparisons across generating technologies in "An international comparative assessment of construction cost overruns for electricity infrastructure" [1].

Here's what the researchers found for solar (section 3.4):

Thirty-nine solar PV and CSP power plants, representing 2374 MW of installed capacity and $16.5 billion worth of investment, were analyzed. (These are utility-scale infrastructure projects, thus they do not include the familiar rooftop solar collectors on buildings or residential configurations.) These projects as a class actually came in $4.2 million less than budgeted, or $200,000 less than expected per project. These solar systems had the lowest
average cost escalation per reference class (1.3 percent), the least time overruns (an average of 2 months ahead of schedule), and the lowest standard deviation for amount of overruns and time overruns. They also had the largest total amount of cost underruns, with the entire class of projects costing $163.9 million less than budgeted, though some of this may be explained by dramatic reductions in cost over the past 4 years. As Table 5 indicates, only 3 facilities had overruns greater than $50 million and only 3 facilities had cost overruns greater than 30%, all of which were CSP facilities rather than large-scale solar PV apparatuses.

Here are a few solar projects that outperformed in recent years:

O'Brien solar farm in Wisconsin, completed in 2021 on time and under budget:

https://www.boldt.com/project/edf-renewables-obrien-solar-fa...

Mount Signal 3 in California, completed in 2018 ahead of schedule:

https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2018/12/8minutenergy-c...

Sun Streams 2 in Arizona, completed under budget and ahead of schedule in 2021:

https://www.enr.com/articles/55112-best-project-energy-indus...

Hillston solar farm in Australia, reached full commercial operation in 2022 ahead of schedule:

https://www.solarquotes.com.au/blog/hillston-solar-farm-mb24...

Kuala Ketil solar farm in Malaysia, completed in 2019 ahead of schedule:

https://www.pv-magazine.com/2019/09/12/50-mw-solar-park-come...

[1] https://www.qualenergia.it/sites/default/files/articolo-doc/...
Please don't break the site guidelines like this or https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35711703. No matter how right you are or feel you are, posts like that are abusive and only make things worse.

As for the community: it's clearly divided on this topic. Each side on any divisive topic complains bitterly about the other side and how it supposedly dominates HN. These perceptions are the product of cognitive bias plus ideological passion, and the comments they lead to are mostly flamewar noise. If you'd please avoid that, and stick to either (1) posting substantive, thoughtful, respectful comments or (2) not posting, we'd appreciate it.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Even more recent than flowering plants: Grass.

> Before 2005, fossil findings indicated that grasses evolved around 55 million years ago. Finds of grass-like phytoliths in Cretaceous dinosaur coprolites from the latest Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) aged Lameta Formation of India have pushed this date back to 66 million years ago.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poaceae

For reference, dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago.
That sounds similar to how I learned math in Montessori in Grades 1-6.

Every math concept had physical "materials" that we had to manipulate to get to the answer (e.g. for square root, you place N beads on a grid in a square form and count how many are on the side). Often, tricks to get quickly at the answer were discouraged early on to promote a proper "grasp" on what the operations entail.
I had this idea once for a Wordpress plugin for Woocommerce websites. A plugin that would abstract all providers APIs to Woocommerce. Paid versions of the plugin would allow the merchant to work with several providers in parallel in order to reduce transaction fees (increasing the operational margin then).
Thats a dependency of the two and thus implied. GPU drivers are a must and i think should be high priority. Freebsd lost the server market but it could aim for the desktop market.
No one is debating whether there are environmental factors. Surely there are. The point is that there are also likely heritable factors. These cannot be erased. And without measuring them, we don't know how much of a "problem" it is that many professors have PhD parents.
> Edit. Seeing a lot of comments saying UK couldn't function without Microsoft which kind of supports my point.

Yup.

The NHS (UK National Health Service) is Microsoft's biggest single account for Office/Office365 and probably other stuff too.

So I guess add on other parts of UK gov and yeah, "couldn't function without Microsoft" is not far from the truth.

I mean, some might argue that the UK government hasn't functioned much since 2016/Brexit anyway, but that's another story. :)
I wonder to what extent tossing away non-paying users will hurt their network effect.

How many people got HBO because their friends (paying or not) were talking about Game of Thrones?

Hopefully for Netflix somebody there has run the numbers WRT one incremental unit of video-delivery-cost is worth more or less than one incremental unit of chatter.
> The two teams were definitely separate and had little day to day communication with each other.

While not tightly intertwined, they studied each others' work, sometimes stealthily.
Yea, that's a bad idea that's ben tried over and over again throughout history to really bad outcomes. It's call feudalism. It was a bad idea then, it's a bad idea now. No property taxes means property will just sit in families for generations b/c there's no incentive to sell and the money generated will be in the same hands perpetually. Really bad idea.
Q&A with React 18 docs (React.dev + ChatGPT)
TikTok gets lambasted for being a mass surveilance platform for the Chinese state.

Microsoft gets a pass.
She appears to be a symbol for everything that went wrong at Google. These are the kind of problems that arise when life is too easy, just before the downfall. In other words, decadence. How else can one explain that Google's AI research was dethroned by OpenAI?
Crude oil is biggest reason of India's fiscal deficit. Investing a lot in Hydrogen and Solar
I also wanted to know this, looking in comment sections
In the korean reality show Physical 100 they make a point of not showing sob stories for contestants. In US reality shows, the sob story is always something stupid like they got a bad haircut or shameless trauma dumping that I somehow doubt will be remedied by some literal hoops to jump through or the prize money.
Sorry, I was unclear. I think STEM is very important but I don't think we need to force everyone into it. I think there are enough STEM-interested kids that will choose this route, if you start with the assumption "STEM is so important we have to make sure everyone gets some" then you have to answer the question how to make it accessible to everyone. I'm in favor of outreach programs and picking out top performers but I don't think forcing a minimum level of STEMness across all students is wise.
> run a filter in the business layer based on allowed role/user/whatever

Yup, this is the way I've seen it implemented everywhere so far.
The Playstation 5 OS (Orbis?) is based on FreeBSD. That sort of counts.
TF in its first version was stellarly misdesigned. It was infuriatingly difficult to use, particularly if you were of the "I just want to write code and have it autodiffed + SGDed" school, I found it crazy to use Python to manually construct a computational graph...
Agree it completely simplifies it so that it can lean in on inequality plot so they can leverage get more engagement.

The family culture on science and education has a much greater weighting then money on outcome. I wonder if they could add that weighting to the equation how different the story line is. I am not discounting that money has benefits but theres a common narrative/fallacy that having the money drives outcomes. It's useless without culture.

To be fair to the researchers the amount of effort to determine culture is more challenging -- requiring at minimum some kind of questionnaire.
I just watched “Ghosted”. It was somewhat entertaining, but hardly stellar. This is the sort of movie that is being released these days, and we can easily take it or leave it.
I would prefer to see a process based approach to a terminology approach. Since payments are transactions, it would be better understood if explained in the form of steps.