skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You could imagine a timestamp being built into the signature, and maybe even gps coordinates, although I agree it wouldn't be a complete solution.
I would argue that the performance of Jira being what it is along makes it pretty unsuitable for just taking reference notes. Our onprem hosted instance is pretty slow, which you might blame on server provisioning, except last time I used Jira cloud it was even worse with an empty instance (compared to our at least multiple million tickets instance)
He's probably referring to one of a variety of permaculture setups that integrates animals and a food forest into their operation. Carbon zero and super cheap to maintain, but challenging to setup and harder to sell some of the products.
Yes, we definitely are.
Consuming always changes. The process for internalizing knowledge stays the same. It will always be in-depth deliberate practice, spaced repetition or repeated use, and time.

When you rely on something else to chunk the knowledge for you, you aren't doing the work.

These tools will be great when they don't miss the details relevant to you, but how are you getting the signal when they do miss details for you?

Same thing with Plato and writing. Writing did not limit memory for those that treated writing as a tool. Writing enabled the throughput of putting stuff into long term memory for many scholars. It also encouraged new ways of work. But a reference or summary could never replace what you put in your head.
Discussed at the time:

EU suppressed results of a study that found piracy doesn’t harm sales - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15319476 - Sept 2017 (38 comments)
RIP. First time I heard Harry as a kid was in Beetlejuice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbkybaDR_Co
Do you believe we'll ever stop using fossil fuels in the "near" term? Just about every single product nowadays has some piece of plastic in it, including new EVs, which require fossil fuels to manufacture. There are plenty of lubricants to run the machinery in the factories that manufacture those products, including the renewable energy sources, which (again) require fossil fuels to manufacture.

Getting people to switch cars may be a part of reducing the dependency, but still contributes to the use. It'll be a long road that includes getting down to the minutia, like stopping girls from wearing makeup, before you can entirely remove fossil fuels.

Fossil fuels will not go away for at least a few more generations, because they are far too beneficial and there are no replacements for the myriad of uses they have today.
I love this, but Im always confused in these kinds of analogies what the reward / punishment system really equates to...

Also reminds me of Ted Chiang warning us that we will torture innumerable AI entities long before we start having real conversations about treating them with compassion.
I figure that to the extent anybody is paying attention, I am reminding everyone that there is at least some business being lost because of their abusive practices.

I don't need to go to all the hassle of trying to validate what phones and apps are safe or not to make the point.
and another large Wi-Fi Wireless chipmaker secretly sends data to their mothership + shares with ISPs. What can do you? very little, since the code is binary and it is buried in their FW. Even with Opensource SW, it is hard to get rid of the binary blob.
A few earlier comments here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35695975
Knowing well Latin makes it easier to learn new languages that inherit from it, both on the vocab side and the grammar side. French doesn't really have declinations, for instance. My wife studied it extensively during her studies, and she can pick new languages much quicker than me due to this.
I agree. We should be able to acknowledge that we do harmful things without turning it into judgement on our overall character. It's not hypocrisy to admit that you do bad things sometimes.
It's not a meme. If you look at research that look at foods rich in micronutrients, you'll see that meat covers most of them.

For example, yes Kale is rich in calcium and vitamin K than meat in general, but beef, pork or chicken covers a higher ratio of micronutrients than Kale. Obviously, one should not only eat meat. But the point was that meat itself does not make you sick (unless in excess, like anything).

> Similarly, plants and plant-based foods have full amino profiles. Once again, plug anything from soy beans or even broccoli into Cronometer.com and look at the amino acid breakdown.

Full amino acid profile doesn't mean that it contains the same amount, it just means that it's present. Moreover, nutrient absorption is often lower with vegetables than with meat.

Again, not saying one should not eat vegetables. One definitely should eat fruits and vegetables. But it's clear that lacking meat in one diet has long term consequences that reveals itself later in life.
In their defense, most websites want to be indexed by Google.
It has actually taken over 13 billion years if we're being pedantic. But that's not the point.

What we need to consider is the level of complexity life will be able to sustain after our annihilation. How long did it take to get to humanity from the last time life was at that level of complexity? Much less than 4.2bn years, since we likely will not be reducing life to the level of one single living cell.
I am surprised this happens in Korea. I know such attitudes about antibiotics are commonplace in the developing world. Pharmacists are in the business of selling pills - a doctor's prescription isn't always necessary, but Korea is a high income, well educated country...

1. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Delhi_metallo-beta-lactama...

"NDM-1[1] is an enzyme that makes bacteria resistant to a broad range of beta-lactam antibiotics. These include the antibiotics of the carbapenem family, which are a mainstay for the treatment of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections."

2. Antibiotic usage and resistance in Mexico: an update after a decade of change. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33956642/

"Ten years ago, a review on the status of resistance in Mexico was bleak: with antibiotics freely sold over the counter and poor regulation of generic drugs, among other conditions, resistance among relevant pathogens often ranked top, either among Latin American countries, or even worldwide. "
Really, the goal needs to be to minimize it to whatever we can attain.

There's some really bad redline some place past 1.5C.

Putting the goal possibly to the right of that redline (and possibly blowing past it anyways) is not good.

1.5C is a decent benchmark because it lets us measure various scales of intervention against it.
My gut is only healthy when I'm mostly eating plants, it's crazy to make a blanket statement that eating plants is bad for your gut. How are you supposed to get fiber without plants?
For everyone who is tired of Day-o, I recommend the song Star-o!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hPL9f9es9Q
This isn't just about antibiotics, it's also about monoculture. Both of those combined lead to a never ending arms race.
GM killing off Chevy Bolt and Bolt EUV by end of 2023
One of the authors (Kuncic) has another recent paper where the potentiation and depression in conductance has an analytical form.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10145

I think that what they are doing is a generalized version of that, with multi-probes.
This article finally pushed me over to thinking that we need to start pushing for some laws to limit this sort of thing. It's just pervasive, and "not giving [them] money" is completely ineffective. And for some companies, like Google or Facebook, it's pretty hard for a consumer to actually give them money in the first place, nor is practical [0] to not use their products.

[0] practical, not possible.
I never understood why this 1.5-2C global temperature is such a big issue when dinosaurs were living with average 15-20C Earth temperature and much higher CO2 levels (you can just google "world temperature history" or "co2 levels history". There were much more plants, diverse wildlife, etc. Having warm Earth is much better than having an Ice age, right? Also higher CO2 levels mean more ingridients for new trees/plants (eventually - food). I'm not trolling but really curious on this PoV and seems that the media is onesided on this topic (higher temperature / CO2 levels - bad and that's it). Noone is looking at it at a diferent angle.
Sorry - I meant to add an explanation and got distracted. Thanks for doing it for me :)

If anyone reads those links and still has a question I haven't answered there, I'd be happy to take a crack at it. It's a tricky situation because all of these things are true:

(1) it's the biggest technological development in a long time;

(2) there's way too much material about it, a lot of which is mediocre;

(3) every user has a different threshold for what feels like 'too much' about it on HN.
> Some planned states (or even state-planned states) are preferable to other planned states

Sure, but that's not what we're talking about. The question is: How do you arrive at an unmolested state: that is, how do we steer society and AI away from real and perceived racism without ourselves being racist?

Rothbard puts it in terms of central planning, but the idea is the same. To deal with the devil we must, ourselves, be a tiny bit evil. We cannot fix racism as social engineers by saying "out with yee, white men!", without ourselves being racist. Note that I'm not saying we should do nothing - just that there is no "morally clean" way of "fixing" these issues.
Common share holders almost always get nothing if a company goes bankrupt. That's part of the risk of holding stock. See the section How Assets are Distributed in a Liquidation: https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/09/corporate-liquid...
I think its actually pretty cool but I would also see it in reverse, to have highlighted passages while reading the log form - click to view a relevant summary of why that passage is important point in the longer doc
Using plagiarism rules seems both fair and appropriate (given the source of the AI's content).

A human reviewing an author's writing and then passing it off as their own isn't okay. If they make substantive edits such that it's essentially new work, then it's okay. Discussing with the author then writing their own versions is okay.

Really though what I'm after is a mass protection so consumers can understand that images they're seeing or language they're reading or hearing isn't from a primary (ie human) source. Sort of like the "actor portrayal" or "this image has been photoshopped" requirements some countries have.
I've seen "vegan" dishwasher soap, too.
Interesting, I used kermet on Coherent to dial into work. Once I started it, work would call be back so I would not have to pay for the session on my phone bill.
s2idle on linux doesn't work for me as expected, I've just disabled because it make the laptop very hot and consume energy a lot more than S3 deep sleep, i suspect it keep the cpu running but turn fans off. it also take 30 seconds to resume from sleep.
Show HN: Cicada – Write CI/CD Pipelines in TypeScript
Hi HN! I’m Grant, creator of (https://cicada.build). Cicada lets you write CI/CD pipelines in TypeScript and test them locally.

We built Cicada because of our own struggles building CI/CD pipelines. YAML is cumbersome, not type-safe, and does not scale well for large pipelines. Sharing logic across pipelines is hard and most providers don’t let you test your pipelines locally.

Cicada lets you

1. write your pipelines in a real programming language. Using TypeScript gives you type-checking, syntax highlighting, and in-line documentation out of the box. It also lets you extend your pipelines by hooking into the entire TypeScript ecosystem of packages and modules.

2. test your pipelines locally. All jobs are run in containers. This means you can test them with Docker/Podman. It also means you get great caching.

3. run your pipelines on our cloud. Pipelines are checked into your repository and run when triggered by an event in your repository (like a commit/PR), when triggered manually, or at a defined schedule.

We use Deno [0] to create pipeline definitions, Docker Buildkit [1] as our build engine, and Fly [2] for our cloud hosting. Our CLI is written in Rust for speed and stability. The hardest technical challenge we faced was writing BuildKit bindings for Rust [3].

Cicada’s client is fully MIT OSS (the CLI, BuildKit integration, and SDK) [4]. Our dashboard and cloud runners are closed source. The cloud runners have a generous free tier for individuals and are cheap and easy for teams.

You can create and run your first pipeline on your local device by running `npm install -g @cicadahq/cicada`. You can also learn more in our docs (https://cicada.build/docs) or by joining our Discord (https://cicada.build/discord).

In the meantime, I’d love to hear your feedback on what we’ve built!

[0] https://deno.land/

[1] https://docs.docker.com/build/buildkit/

[2] https://fly.io/

[3] https://github.com/cicadahq/buildkit-rs

[4] https://github.com/cicadahq/cicada
I guess you’re unlucky or maybe I’m lucky. I think I’ve filled up 1500 times and never had to leave a station and go to another because it wasn’t working.

And I’ve never experienced bad gas requiring repairs.

I’d say 95% of these fillups were in the US if that matters.
there still are plenty of RTS, and probably also arena shooters, depending on what your requirements for inclusion are, coming out. maybe you don't see them because they are drowned out by other stuff, but there still are. (for instance, AOE4 is recent, unreal tournament is soon releasing I think)
Not sure why this is getting downvoted? He's right. The odds that global warming will stay below 1.5C are miniscule. I guess there may be PR benefits in pushing 1.5C because it's ambitious (shoot for the moon and land among the stars), but those PR benefits will be offset by the fact that anyone who does the tiniest bit of research will realize that it's bullshit! Not to mention that using 1.5C as a goal without lying is difficult.

"If we do <x> we'll be able to stay under 1.5C" <- lie

"If we don't do <y> we won't be able to stay under 1.5C" <- possibly true, but deceptive

"Our goal is to keep global warming under 1.5C" <- lie, a goal is by definition achievable and anyone who's giving statements on climate change knows that 1.5C is not achievable
It is good I saw photos of platypuses before Stable Diffusion.
Is anyone getting any value-add out of AutoGPT?
That could be interesting. I had a co-worker (at a different company, while on an open-source project) whom I highly respected because of his excellent code reviews. I think it would have to be done with an established build chain (e.g. formatters, linters, CI) so as not to degenerate into trivia and bikeshedding. I think it would be most interesting (assuming a good interviewer) if the approach under review were actually somewhat defensible.
> Why would I spend such crazy $ for a brand new iPhone

Some people care about getting software support after the sale.

The $399 OG iPhone SE from back in 2016 just got another security update a few weeks ago. The OG Google Pixel was also released in 2016 and has been completely abandoned for several years now.
Paul Quigley said it best in the comments "It's a phenomenon completely started by clout-chasing LinkedIn influencers"
To clarify; human are not part of the environment? What is setting us apart exactly ?

I suspect the fact that we use various tools. But at the end of the day we need food, light and water.
Wait, did Microsoft kill sleep?
Just think of that 0.1C as an incremental step making even more of what's currently productive agricultural land, not. Can you give up a little more? Maybe... but not forever.
I, and many other, know what you are saying but the community is not aware of any of this. After the serious incidents people are still not turning their faces to the nuclear. Teaching is not a right word to use in this situation, however I think the governments should do whatever they can do. Fo example, the social media accounts of Department of Energy, Us doing good for a while.
Yeah, but I have little interest in pointing a finger at developers for inflated salaries while there's the Sundar Pichai crowd being paid north of $200 million a year.

A mediocre developer can be a drag on a company or just keep the lights on. A mediocre CEO gets paid enough to fund an overpaid developer at $400K a year for... oh, about 560 years.

The damage that a mediocre (or worse) C-suiter or VP does to a company is a lot worse than the mediocre developer (and, in fact, there's a straight line to overstaffing/overpaying and the "leadership") will ever do.

As long as folks are calling out other workers as overpaid and neglecting the execs, the industry is going to continue to get worse.
I keep seeing people claim that no one offers alternatives to live coding in interviews, but not only does the author provide an alternative (take home coding test/project), there are obviously many alternatives to live coding. I've been working in this industry for over two decades, and I've interviewed more candidates than I can count. I can assess a candidate with a 20 minute conversation, because a candidate's understanding of the context and theory of how and why things are done the way they are determine how good they are at the job. Ask them what happens when you visit a website. The amount of detail they go into, and what details they focus on, will tell you an enormous amount about them. Ask them whether they prefer an OO or functional approach to organizing code. The good candidates will have thorough, well-thought out opinions, and you're handing the bad candidates enough rope to hang themselves.

Of course, in order to be able to assess the answers to these questions in an effective way, you need to be able to very knowledgeable yourself, and that's the real root of the problem here.
Some movers seem to be very good at moving Ikea furniture. Wrap it up, cinch it tight with straps. I've seen packed billy bookcases and garbage malm wardrobes moved this way without structural compromise. Saved a lot of time packing too. Bigger items need to be disassembled like bed I would pick something with steel frame that gets nut and bolted.
The my ideal fediverse product is one that is simple and runs on RSS.

Is there such a project?
I mostly agree, but there is one slight benefit: whenever I read one of these articles, each topic acts as a little quiz where I get to test whether I think it's a do or a don't before seeing the explanation
I see a therapist who specializes in OCD. They believe that the mood journal trend around 2010-2015 led to a lot of people - nearly all of their patients including me - having a compulsion to write down and re-think/overvalue every passing thought.
This is one of the lowest hanging fruits for generative AI in the workplace: let the language model rewrite people's notes into the structured form.
I’m trying to discern your point. If it’s about cars having a data connection then my point makes no sense, obviously. But your comment was in response to someone complaining about “remote control” which is just “remote unlock” (that’s all Tesla does remotely in the context of GGP). So that’s how I interpreted your response.
It’s the nature of how computers make copying an initial work nearly zero additional cost.

This has never been the case in human history prior to digital/analog recording of content, and it keeps getting closer and closer to zero cost to duplicate.

This breaks people’s moral framework because they now have to grasp things like game theory to understand second and third order harm.
It isn't the poster who's developed this theory. It's a matter of chemistry. It's possible life could persist, but we don't know of chemical processes that would make it possible, so we shouldn't expect that it can.
But the kernel does not know what it does.

In fact, the article claims:

> During operation, the covert operating system (AMSS) has complete control over the hardware, microphone and camera
Provenance, patina, narrative all of these live inside your head and have nothing to do with reality. It’s the perverse motive of the collector seeking unchanging authenticity. Everything and everyone evolves and changes over time. You can’t stop the clocks.
It's just stupid Nihilism in an attempt to seem cool. It's putting lipstick on the pig of just sticking your head in the sand and ignoring the problem. There's a lot of money in ignoring the problem, so a lot of pressure by certain groups to do so.
I've trained my a.i eyes to filter all the articles written by chatgpt bros, unfortunately I missed that one
No. It makes you a gambler.

And gamblers don't usually make money, because they're in it for entertainment rather than making money, saving money, or providing for their families.

Believe it or not, investing is an activity that, under the correct circumstances, leads to the benefit of the investor, the company, and the economy in general. I personally seek this behavior that's beneficial to society in general (and its non-zero sum: I trade liquidity that I have today for the promise of modest future gains). Like 5%/year (aka, the current FFR / risk free rate) to 15%/year on the riskier bets on good years.

People looking for returns much larger than 5% to 15%/year today are gambling. That's just not the speed at which companies grow, so you're betting that other people have undervalued a company, or you're betting on a "Greater fool" swooping in to rescue you. You're not betting on the underlying mechanisms that lead to economic growth.
Understanding first-hand the workings of business operations, needs of customers, regulatory issues, and other nuances.
Observation, the same way you find out if they are TRULY vegetarians, their indicated political party, or their indicated sexual orientation. Not saying that it's practical or not an invasion of privacy, but objectively that's how you verify. Otherwise you have to depend on self-reporting.
Our kids will also inherit all of the amazing technologies and scientific advances that were developed as a result of cheap, abundant energy. It is a tradeoff and climate change is a solvable problem.

It’s easy and comforting to spout predictions of the apocalypse, but realistically speaking, things will be okay.
People usually use the opposite argument: if we've been eating meat for so long, how could it be bad?

A food we've evolved with can have a negative impact on us because the evolutionary trade-off is to optimize for reproductive age. Something like high cholesterol, for example, didn't stop our ancestors from siring children in their teens and 20s.

On the other hand, foods we started eating recently including novel foods don't have this antagonist pleiotropic effect.

But we did evolve with meat.
Still incredibly energy intensive. I honestly cannot think of any food that isn't, at least indirectly if not directly, so I want to know more about these farming practices that can contain the energy need.
Most non technical people would think there are zero circumstances where a spreadsheet could be a cat.
> Tesla is able to remotely unlock a vehicle if they verify the owner.

But with another car, I can choose who (if anyone) I'm willing to give that ability to. I certainly wouldn't want it to be Tesla.
Does anybody know if there is an easy-to-deploy setup for tortoise-tts only?
Sure, it's literally self.count_ones() == 1 -- so we just implement count_ones() and ah, well, we could do all this by hand but turns out (fill in name of CPU) has a CPU instruction specifically for this. Rust calls the intrinsic we're about to go write intrinsics::ctpop()

Now we're writing per-ISA intrinsics, what was our goal again? Maybe I was too oblique, this stuff is all rabbit holes is what I was getting at. We're lucky these people even re-surface periodically with work and a blog post.