skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Very limited in where you can build it

There was a scientific study that looked this precise question and found 10x as many sites as necessary

>grid scale batteries Don't exist.

Your assertion is trivially disproven with a quick google.

>Aka burning furl and calling it carbon neutral

aka making hydrogen from excess solar/wind, storing it, burning it and turning that into electricity.

it's unfortunately only 50% efficient but that still makes it cheaper than nuclear power.
The display still has to be rendered on the player’s screen for them to react to it. Cloud gaming only increases the volume of data coming down to the client so it seems logical any latency issues would be amplified, even if using a top video codec.
Perhaps, in the second sentence, they meant total calories. More fat with protein is good, more fat with carbs - bad. According to this paper. But, yes, the abstract section could be greatly improved.
The inability to self-host probably violates terms of service agreement. If I'm not mistaken, Amazon Ring wants total control over recordings and E2E functionality; a blessing and a curse. I understand cloud and device security costs money, however it's giving bait-and-switch which I thought was illegal. Amazon could frame it as they are providing best-in-business cryptography and storage at low latency, with customer trust being central driving factor. However, this all falls apart when we consider Amazon also created a "reality" TV show using Ring customer data. Yikes.

Without a subscription, what are the benefits of owning a Ring cam? Does the customer have any control of Ring functionality with respect to data privacy, or is it really just Amazon-controlled surveillance tech?
UToronto does:

* https://bgp.he.net/AS239#_prefixes6

It's just that particular department may not have bothered.
Thanks for the explanation. Do you think that because GPT-X will likely have more base training than an open source model someone attempts to train themselves, the outcomes may end up being better if say the fine tuning and embedding were the same for both options?
*reported latency

Not saying reported is unequal to actual on that system, just pointing out the reality, a cloud gaming vendor is saying “this is out latency”
I hear ya, but to your point about “some creep buzzing you,” at least you’re aware of it for now.

A silent drone could be much creepier...
Yes, homework helps.

Are you aware of any skill where practice isn’t necessary?

There is research in this area [0] so feel free to check it out.

Of course practicing math helps. Parents help too, but working on problems at home to find areas that need help and then working with the teacher helps as well.

I don’t think you need hours and hours, but the goal of homework is to reinforce the lesson, practice, and show mastery of the material and areas to work on before the exam.

[0] https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/003465430760010...
In a previous version of the article they concluded by pitching their "AI-powered cloud database tuning" product.
They must be thinking of the age he was (roughly) in the first two movies, with 1936 and 1935 settings (respectively). He'd be 35 or 36 for Temple, and 36 or 37 for Raiders.
To clarify, I was talking about something like a photograph that you carry with you, little knick knacks like that.

As for land, if you could actually hide the physical body of land from people, then sure, it could sort of apply there. I don't think I meant "hiding" by legal means though. I mean if nobody can physically see it or look it up in a database to know it exists.

Realistically, we mostly don't own anything by my definition. Does that mean my definition is wrong?

In any case, I'm not claiming that my understanding is correct, just that people have different understandings and mine happens to be what I mentioned above.

I'm still curious about yours.
I haven't signed up (yet) precisely because I resent it being developed on the backs of the public while being a windfall for them - and that I need to provide a verifiable identity in order to participate.

Will I eventually give in? Possible. I've been meaning to learn how to set it up on my home network.
Losing 1M users is not good, but isn't the real question how many accounts they lost?

There's another question: how's the competition doing? Amazon and Sky Showtime are much better in new subscriptions. HBO is 50% in new subscriptions. The measure is killing mindshare.
Use fief ! By the creator of FastAPI
Hmm, in the US at least it's pretty much ubiquitous on cell networks? My home ISP also at least does 6rd, not as nice as native, but a start.
In that case, we should let them slip their deadlines and graduate at 20 or 25
The elegant universe
At best, we might get another awesome south park episode out of this
If you're being serious, it's more that within time you begin to realize both your fragility and lack of power over yourself and nature. And on top of that you realize the narrow perspectives you held as a child that came for your culture, like owning things or believing you have control over them, are far less real than we think. Here she points out, look, you can say you own something, but that's a cultural concept. Long after you are dead and gone that land will be there, you will not. Long after you said you can control nature, it will consume you in the grave. You are a part of it, and for a time you can exert some power over it, but in the long term, we are just waiting to be overrun by it. What may appear inferior, could, over a long time horizon, prove superior. Trees for example have survived 100's of millions of years, and humans are a mere 10's of thousands. We are young, ambitious and naive and we are cutting them down -- the thing that provides the very air we breath.

Its a broader perspective that come with age I'm guessing.
> Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark

Tell me you're under 30 without telling me you're under 30.
> I have the same cooler! No expo issues on gigabyte ds3h.

Ah I'm less lucky: ASUS Prime B650-Plus mobo and the link says that on the Gamer Nexus forum (?) it could be a problem with ASUS motherboards.

> Why haven't you undervolted the cpu with all your interest for noise?

Honestly I'm not too sure how to do that. I never bother overclocking/underclocking. I like everything stock. I thought running DDR5-6000 from the QVL list in EXPO mode was also something really normal to do.
It’s also a clean, large, modern, type hinted Django project which is useful for learning Django
Didn't work so well in The Irishman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqGV0IuodWE

Something uncanny about his face. Takes me out of the scene.
> Ripcord is a desktop chat client for group-centric service

apples and oranges?

Also, I seem to recall there was some drama about if one used Ripcord against a Discord server, it resulted in your account getting banned
>> Is a house the same house if your tear it down and build a factory?

> The house argument is silly when applied to Japan of all places, which is known for frequently doing demolish-and-rebuild for wooden construction. Even one of the famous castles.

You misunderstood what I said, read it again. Is a factory the same house, if it was built on the same plot of land? It's an entirely different thing, and it's just nonsensical to bring up ship-of-Theseus in a case like that.
>it is the distribution of copied information that copyright protects against, the information has been uploaded in vectors

The "vectors" are not "uploaded" or "copied" into a file or neural network, they're transformed. In the context of stable diffusion, They're transformed, progressively "noised" or "corrupted", "diffused" with random gaussian noise, and in the context of stable diffusion, it's "trained" and "learns" how to "denoise" various "noised" stages of images represented as a vector of pixel data into their original form.

Then, when it comes to generation of images consistent with an "annotation" or "prompt", it is "conditioned towards" or "biased towards", with more "training", by noising an input image, and concating or combining that vector of pixels with a vector of the annotation of the image. It then "learns" to denoise with that conditioning information, the annotation.

Then, you can take the trained model, and do the same thing, with just a text prompt as a vector concated to a vector of random gaussian noise, and no input images.

That's basically and very simplistically how it works.

The output is not a substantial reproduction from the input images + annotations when trained. It takes the random noise, and "tries" to denoise it into something consistent with the prompt with conditioning to guide it.

Your attempt at covering would be a substantially similar reproduction. Your goal is to do a reproduction. Whereas, the model "learns" to generate images consistent with an annotation/prompt, by conditioning it with that "goal" on top of how it "learned" to denoise the images.
It's become somewhat of a meme, where Schmidhuber seemingly tries to claim credit for nearly everything. I _think_ it's because he published ideas back in the 90s or so that weren't fully executable/realized at the time, and later people figured out how to actually flesh them out do it, and supposedly didn't cite him appropriately/enough. Often the ideas weren't exactly the same - but rather he claims they're derivatives of the concept he was going for.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%BCrgen_Schmidhuber#Credit...
Real politicians being elected and leading people in real life is not similar to a movie studio trying to squeeze money from a nostalgic audience for a pure luxury purchase that no one has to buy.
Why must they be so narrow?
Any web based front ends yet? I put together a system that runs a variety of web based open source AI image generation and editing tools on Vultr GPU instances. It spins up instances on demand, mounts an NFS filesystem with local caching and a COW layer, spawns the services, proxies the requests, and then spins down idle instances when I'm done. Would love to add this, suppose I could whip something up if none exists.
You can provide them with your email and they will send you a newsletter. That counts as storing user data and would require them to have to deal with the GDPR behemoth. Compliance costs a lot of time and money. Or you could just block EU users, which are not going to be reading a lot of Buffalo local news. Categorizing it as just extreme tracking is disingenuous.
> Do you, at least, believe that confidentiality agreements should be broken if it is to make the police or public aware of a crime? How about a civil infraction, such as a hostile working environment?

Absolutely. I referenced whistleblowing in my original post above. This isn't a such a case.
> Having a liberal-leaning thesis isn't "woke"

"Woke" has become a fuzzy culture-war term with no clear meaning when used perjoratively. Racial diversity? "Woke". Non-heteronormative relationships? Also "woke". A sci-fi movie about blue native cat-people fighting imperialism is apparently also woke[1].

A conservative strategist boasted that they successfully co-opted the term to be malleable enough to fit any topic that the conservative voters may dislike. So my definition of woke is accurate by their standard; where are you basing your definition?

1. I'm taking Ben Shapiro's word for it.
> So said brilliant engineer in Amsterdam, built an annealing algorithm in the release build to reorder the optimization passes in such a way to as minimize size. This shaved a whooping 11 MBs off the total machine code size and bought us enough runway to keep development going.

Wow. You know you have made bad choices when you need a desperation play like that.
I like Mattermost and Zulip: they have paid plans, but are also fully open source / self hostable, so you know your data stays with you if that's what you want.
What's the point of getting a 79 year old to physically do the acting if it's all digital after anyways?
Yubico has proffered a standard enhancement designed to enable FIDO keys to “automatically” enroll a paired backup when you enroll a primary key.

They wrote about it here in 2020: https://www.yubico.com/blog/yubico-proposes-webauthn-protoco...

I’m not clear on whether it has gained any traction, and it’s not something I see a lot of my peers in security aware of.
Dual Threat CEOs outperform traditional VCs
You're right, but downvoted because it is much, much harder to do what you're asking. But it's just bad science to ignore or not want to do something because it's harder. Modeling biological or physiological systems is something we do via animal sacrifice as well. My own research uses mice. I think current versions of LLMs could be used for synthesizing the framework of such models, at the very least. It would certainly make for an interesting open source framework, and would be pretty valuable if done right. There are some options already, but they are too specialized and not geared towards systems biology or physiology. Mainly the way I think about it is that a mouse can't reason with you about why you shouldn't do what you do to it. So you, as the more analytically mature being have to make up your own reasons. Is it worth it? That would be a digression for this post.

But more importantly, a lot of bad science is done while wasting away animal life. Regulatory bodies can at least do something to make it less cheap or harder to justify the use of animal models. Or at least ensure a higher standard of expectations for having used animal sacrifice.
Since 2016, nearly 400(!) Dual Threat CEOs have raised funds on AngelList. Their returns are at least at parity, if not materially better than the top-tier firms. “Dual Threat CEOs” are CEOs who are simultaneously running VC funds and venture-backed companies.
I'm not really judging, you do you, but you are confirming my original thoughts as to the motivations behind pirating being rooted in selfishness. I'm very selfish myself so that's not a statement of judgement.
I have not measured the impact outside benchs and yes you are probably fine with 4800s, but I use my pc for work and I would avoid slower ram when as a dev all my IDEs and processes do nothing but R/W from memory.
From my experience, the blame lands on documentation and consistency at the implementation level. What should be a fairly simple process (redirect -> receive an HTTP request w/ code to exchange -> perform an HTTP request to exchange code for token) is always made into some esoteric spaghetti.

I recently wasted hours implementing OAuth login for Bitbucket because their docs have bad links, bad explanation of params to pass, and bad explanation of endpoints to hit. I implemented Github and Gitlab just before in ~30 minutes total, so it really is a YMMV by provider problem.
What a charming celebration of failure. We need more of this in our businesses and our lives. It’s a good way to give people permission to aim high, take big risks and help pick up the pieces when it doesn’t work out. I love the gift card for the most rejected, they were the biggest risk taker!
I'm not super familiar with all of it on a tech level, but is some of this because individual apps that shouldn't exist hoard it?

In my case it's Duo, literally the only 2FA thing I must use that doesn't let me have my dang token so I can use whatever app I want?
That tweet is vague. Besides, it says like 'like SD', so I will be pleasantly shocked if the models are open source.
Because the documentation is bad. Oauth is really simple:

Lets say you want to use google as an auth provider. You do this:

"Hey google who is this guy? I'm going to send them to google.com/oauth, send them back to example.com/oauth, and in the headers of the request include the word "Authorization: bearer" followed by a bunch of text"

Google says "Oh yeah I know that guy, here I'll send them back to where you said with a token"

Then later on you can take the token and say "Hey google, somebody gave me this token, who is it?"

That's pretty much it. You have to trust that google isn't lying to you, but that's kindof the point of oauth.

But that's never what the documentation says. It's always 10 pages long and the examples are like "here's a fully functioning python web server using flask and function decorators, oh the actual auth flow, which is really like 3 lines of code, is hidden inside of a library".

To people who write documentation: PLEASE for the love of god show me how to talk to your API both using your library, but also using something like urllib2 or requests or something.

Ideally the documentation is the absolute most minimal way of making the service work, and then adds more and more usefulness on top of that. I'm not going to judge you for writing bad code in an example. The example could practically be pseudocode for all I care. I just want to see generally how your API is supposed to work.

edit: yes, auth0, I am looking at you.
ford is benjamin button at movies anymore
Amazon Halo Health Trackers Discontinued
De-aging doesn't really work when the actors have the tonus of a 80yo like in The Irishman. You get those young looking actors that are mostly static, slow moving and struggling to stand up.
> I’ve seen repeatedly that it’s much harder for a ML PhD to learn chemistry than for a chemist to learn ML

I can confirm. We regularly look for people to write some computational physics code, and recently for people using ML to solve solid state physics problems. It’s way easier to bring a good physicist or chemist to a decent CS level (either ML or HPC) than the other way around.
So your kid wants to be a streamer
That's a convenient tidbit put forth by who. Reject the premise that "replicating it" requires emphasizing this factor over others. If the true owners of Taiwanese fabs simply took less of the surplus share, the fab could be replicated here by spending more on American workers.
Ahh, I apologize, I misunderstood the point you were making. "Android" is not to blame for "Samsung"'s implementation of it, I agree. What I was trying to say originally (and I'll admit I think we got off-track) is, more or less, that Android is not 1 "thing", it's a bunch of things and some of them are not well done (Samsung/etc) and other are better (Google) but the inconsistency taints the whole OS for me.

I'm coming at this both as a user and as a developer. My iOS apps or web pages generally have a bug or they don't across all of iOS, the same is not true for Android. I pay for BrowserStack first and foremost so I can test my app on the exact make/model/OS of Android that a user has who reports an issue (or that comes from Sentry). There are differences in the iOS versions but I've rarely been bitten by that whereas I have been for Android a number of times (normally due to Samsung vs Google vs Other, even if they are all the "same" Android version).
I've heard this sort of thing for 20 years
Seems like a mischaracterization because I don't see a problem.

UC CS undergrads had to take statistics for engineers and scientists.

UC CS undergrad majors in particular could end within 2 courses from a math undergrad degree. Is this not the case that squishier applied courses are possible?

EE/CS undergrads had to take the entire upper-division physics track for scientists and engineers, including modern physics.

So has something changed since then and is something changing back?
What blacksmith said. Reunification with Taiwan is part of Xi's mandate... and he is 69 years old: https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-xi-pledges-reunif...

But even if Taiwan isn't invaded, TSMC could still be compromised. For instance, they could suffer from a severe peacetime cyberattack, physical sabotage, a blockade of the island, or even get damaged in a failed invasion attempt or a brief exchange of fire. They are a high profile target.
After watching Harrison Ford on 1923, it's because he mostly moves like someone half his age still, but also, he moves like Harrison Ford.
Apple has a few great shows but a pretty significant amount of junk too. I don't know that it's all that meaningfully different.
That’s easy, I’ll split your $10 large with my friend.
The main problem with Zulip is that I always end up messaging in the wrong channel without noticing.
The only thing I can see in the article that supports that is:

"Our sources also added further details about the nature of the chip failures — in some cases, excessive SoC voltages destroy the chips' thermal sensors and thermal protection mechanisms, completely disabling its only means of detecting and protecting itself from overheating"

And "Our Sources" aren't motherboard vendor statements, none of the statements from motherboard vendors or AMD themselves support this theory, so we're relying on Tom's unnamed "sources" rather than any public evidence or statement.

This is exactly what I dislike - the slow removal of the source and quality of evidence and information. It's Toms being bad too, as their statement

"seconded by an ASUS statement to Der8auer, the problem stems from SoC voltages"

does not seem a good representation of the actual statement - the image of which I linked.
You could probably fit all the people who fit the last criteria in the same room (chemistry side is probably the bottleneck, especially drugs which is a effectively a specialization).
So you put down on paper that you're against the AI machine.... that's bold, dude.
Please can CO2 alarms become as common as smoke alarms...?

Too much CO2 has pretty clear downsides[1], and probably takes away far more productivity than people killed in fires, yet we mostly ignore it in building codes worldwide. Whereas a new building without smoke detectors would be illegal in much of the world.

[1]: http://www.aretas.ca/sites/default/files/imce_images/Indoor%...
Its not Google's project anymore. They're still the largest contributor, but Red Hat, VMWare, and Microsoft are all massive contributors [1]

[1] https://k8s.devstats.cncf.io/d/9/companies-table?orgId=1&var...
Reading this

“We weren’t sure LCS was executing the missions it was designed for,” Commander of Naval Surface Forces Vice Adm. Roy Kitchener said in January 2022. “And so we … went out to the number of fleet commanders and said, ‘Alright, what do you want it to do? And what missions do you want it to execute based on the environment we’re in now?’”

reminds me of this excerpt from a movie:

Pentagon Wars - Bradley Fighting Vehicle Evolution

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXQ2lO3ieBA

From the movie "Pentagon Wars". Bradley Fighting Vehicle design and development. Any design engineer will love this scene.
Thanks for that. The taking a test with open notes analogy makes a lot of sense.

Given that knowledge, as an end user it seems I would want to spend my time ensuring that the embedding data being selected is as good as possible.
I would have loved this method, my kids would not thrive with it.

I loved CLEP exams and stuff where you just study, take the test, and demonstrate mastery. I wish schools did this more, but I think they want to keep you there.

I had a year where I was really independently studying where I would check in each day to show off homework and tests and then just run around outside for the rest of the day. I would have about 15 minutes of “school” each day and then just play. Or I would do the whole month or semester in a day and then run around.

It’s hard to know how effective it is. I had fun. And I still remember fractions and George Washington and stuff covered that year. And I did well in “regular” school after that.

It’s just a big risk to run with kids so I don’t think schools want to do it at scale.
That's not what GP said. GP complained about having to pay as if there were multiple households benefiting, when it's actually just one household, albeit a wealthy one. If NFLX said "we're going to start charging rich people more, based on zip code," there would be a revolt.

I would assume it's not their intention to try to "go after" this segment and make them pay more (since it's a small portion of their users, and the revenue opportunity is small), but they've undoubtedly thought about this possibility and the unfairness it creates.