skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nothing wrong with touchscreens, just don't rely exclusively on them for basic vehicle operations! Thoughtless trend-following caused all these UX complaints in the first place, and it sounds like the automakers are hoping it will fix them as well. It won't.
Even if they decided not to change it which is fully within their rights and somehow that gets the article moderated off the front page of Hacker News, isn't that still moderating Hacker News? No one is getting censored, just like nobody is entitled to have their article be on Hacker News.
Amazon Is Winding Down Its Halo Health Trackers in Latest Cut
> many of which will be raped and subject to slave labor conditions.

for far leas damaging crimes is the crucial part.

To be clear: I don’t support those conditions for anyone. When society meets out punishment, it shouldn’t be used as an excuse to terrorize people who are serving out their sentence. But that it happens to people who don’t even deserve it is horrifying.
It could be, but it's notoriously hard to predict. Those 10 productive workers could join (or form) a competitor and result in far more damage to revenue than was saved in labor costs across all 100 of the laid off workers, for example.
Dupe of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35710854
There's a discord with tons of sample images, where we've been waiting patiently for the release, coming SOON, for 3 months now. https://discord.gg/pxewcvSvNx
It won't just be cheaper entertainment. It'll be cheaper "literally every video content that includes humans".

I suspect this will result in an increased production value or quality of the lower tiers the same way that cheap camera/mic hardware and good/cheap software upped the production value of your average hobbyist tier youtube channel.
Should have the label 2022
Yes you take the performance hit, but many workloads are low enough throughput for it to be completely fine.

I’m not sure how you could detect such anomalies though without running the same serialization checking logic within postgres
Creating two children, once she knew she’s facing prison, to hope first for no sentence and second for indefinite delays, might count as sociopath behavior.
I’ve never seen any car dash with more than a few dozen buttons.
> What you want is not freedom of speech, it's controlled speech.

Freedom of speech exists to protect good faith speech. Bad faith speech is protected as a consequence because it is hard/impossible to tell the difference between bad faith and good faith speech.

When speech is used in bad faith it erodes the right. Paradox of tolerance and all that. If intolerance is a winning strategy, then a strategy of intolerance will grow. Here is a game to understand a very deep political truth, maybe the political truth: https://ncase.me/trust/

It is like the second amendment. The second amendment literally says sometimes it's right for there to be "consequences." Is murder bad? Yeah. Do we have a constitutional right to sacrifice ourselves attempting to kill people who take away peoples freedoms? That is certainly the colloquial understanding. Extra judicial murder to ensure a free state is almost literally enshrined in our constitution. Guns represent violence and violence against the state can only be done extra juridically.

The second amendment is like freedom of speech. Our right to own weapons is being eroded because people are using weapons in bad faith, to shoot up schools.

So I am in favor of these rights, while against bad faith exercises of these rights. There is nuance to be understood and black and white views of freedom and rights ultimately hurt those freedoms. Someone who has a gun pointed at them is not free, yet we have a right to own guns which are a tool that can take away freedom. So are guns a right to take power, or are guns a right to prevent oppression? A gun can do both, yet our right is to own guns. We have a right to speech, but a responsibility to use it correctly, just like we have a right to guns, but a responsibility to use them correctly.

Do you see how it's a little more complicated than wanting controlled speech? I don't want controlled speech because that asserts a position the powerful are taking against the poweless. I want responsible speech just like I want responsible gun use. That's a cultural value and I want a cultural change promoted.

> Otherwise it would be legal and ethically acceptable to fire people for joining a union or privately advocating for viewpoints not accepted by management.

Isn't it already legal? Definitely in practice if not statute. Unions are not first and foremost a legal construct. If people think their unions are a legal construct then they have already failed. Unions are a power construct, they are a tool to exert force by collectivizing it. Laws regarding unions are ultimately a tool of oppression because the government works on behalf of the wealthy and so those laws ultimately represent wealthy interests. Unions are exactly like the 2nd amendment in that to exercise unionization to fight oppression, it must be done extra-judicially.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulletproof_hosting
Here is the same video on youtube, in much worse quality. maybe this will work. I've linked to the correct timestamp, but if that doesn't work, seek to about 19:50 and listen for ~60 seconds: https://youtu.be/phfaDMEMFaU?t=1189
because much of what we learn is not reinforced through repetition and application. i want to leave open how that's done, but we can't expect students to automatically retain everything that is presented in a lesson.
But that's what my code does, albeit my code loads only on demand (plus can be easily improved to load any further language dynamically), whereas your code statically bundles everything into the main bundle (if not using proprietary Webpack chunk comments, which I see as antipatterns).
"Switch" to this statement in "case" of this expression, seems quite easy to grasp.
If you can ignore all the bad examples then you can definitely confirmation bias your way into any type of government.

The reality is that if you're looking for government to solve all your problems then you're going to always end up disappointed. You agree that history attests to the success of the US, but let's not kid ourselves. It's still the most successful country the world has ever seen on multiple metrics. That's not because its non-representative (aka flawed) democracy happened to put the right people in charge, but because the power of the government was deliberately limited by the rule of law.

I agree we should be worried about demagoguery. At the very least, though, I'm grateful that there isn't just one absolutely powerful person, explicitly above the law, that can fall under the influence of a Rasputin or their favorite concubine.
What these AI companies need are some good old-fashioned leakers. We should be seeing these models show up on sketchy pirate sites, complete with garish 80s-style cracking screens crediting various '1337 haX0rs with witty pseudonyms.
If I’m fully engaged with a device a touch screen is great, especially when that device needs to do more things than you could reasonably make physical controls for.

But when I’m driving and need to adjust something, I don’t want to disconnect with driving to dive into a touch screen.

A physical control, in the same location means muscle memory can take over. And as we learnt decades ago, the controls themselves need to be physically distinct so that you can tell them apart without looking or thinking too hard.

I don’t think touchscreens need to disappear from cars, there’s a wealth of settings/config/etc they could be useful for.

But the core driving aids and temperature/volume control need to be physical.
Voice control is a bit of a nonstarter as the speech recognition (perhaps combined with the weird acoustics of a moving vehicle) has never worked for everyone; eg my father's accent never seems to work in his Honda. My car is from 2014 and definitely has more buttons than necessary. I don't mind infrequently used controls behind a touchscreen, like do the controls to set the time on the clock really need dedicated buttons? But the issue as I see it is that whats frequently used for some is infrequently used for others. For example, I never take my car's drive mode out of eco, but my sister switches to sport when she goes up big hills. Once you get out of the category of obviously frequently controlled things (gear selector, climate control, media controls), you really have to start making judgement calls and picking and choosing who you're going to make uncomfortable. For example, do you prioritize a radio selector? Some people never use the AM/FM radio on their car. Some people only listen to AM/FM radio and never connect their smartphone.
I was just looking for OCR. How does this compare with easyOCR?
In general market incumbents, especially the larger ones, shouldn't resent new regulation. As long as it affects all their competitors equally, they won't lose market share and can pass on increased costs to customers. In this case, customers receive additional value (right to repair) so they should accept additional costs, if any.

I think the manufacturers' real concern has not been cost of compliance, but rather loss of service revenues which business model is arguably customer-hostile.
To view this and other Mastodon toots without Javascript add "/embed" to the left side of URL.

https://sackheads.social/@Cloudguy/110256617380917383/embed
Love the Buick Cascada button explosion

https://bestride.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/2016-Buick-C...
> I have to do “prompt engineering” when I talk to other people all the time

Pulling from my hardware background...

When you design with FPGA's and write code using HDL (Hardware Description Language; Verilog, VHDL) you learn to write code the compile will use to infer the hardware structures you are after. Despite what it may seem, you are not programming, you are describing hardware and, in some cases, use use idioms or structures that will result in the desired outcome.

In some ways prompt engineering can be thought of as learning how to cause the AI to deliver the desired result using the most efficient prompt text.
In case of OAuth2/OIDC, if I do not use external providers (like Google etc.), I can still deploy one of the many OAuth2/OIDC providers myself and centralise handling of user database this way.

This also means I have one place to support sending last resort emails

As for enterprise auth, a lot of places in fact do not use emails for identity. Sometimes there's more than one login id mapping to one identity (noticeable case - Kerberos/LDAP as done by Active Directory, where your login can come in email-style form and pre-AD form, and the email-style one doesn't have to correspond to an email)
Going against a trend and being wrong hurts more than following the trend and being wrong.
I don't think the bus will get fixed unless somebody fixes it either.
Dallas makes the most sense as that's where at&t's fiber terminates from this area. If i lived a little further south it would go to either georgia or whatever major city is along I-10 in texas, don't feel like looking at the map.

Starlink used to show me near chicago, but now is pretty consistently also dallas. T-mo is most likely to show me on the east coast.

I live in Central Louisiana.
Here is the way it works, as explained in the article:

> [S]he is appealing [Judge] Davila’s ruling that she remain in custody while it is determined whether she should get a new trial... The appeal automatically delays her reporting date, and she will now remain out of prison until a court of appeals rules on her request.
Except HTTP prohibits copying headers from redirect responses to redirected requests. That's why OIDC exists, to deal with that by abusing URI q-params.

I've an Internet-Draft somewhere to fix this by making it possible to indicate on a 3xx that this is for authentication (so copy Authorization: from redirect responses to redirected requests) and to allow 401s to have Location: headers that make it more like a 3xx, and 3xxs have WWW-Authenticate:, so you can negotiate between legacy HTTP auth and redirect-based authentication.
My hypothesis is that your last observation is because of the ostracization (or separation?) of those individuals from society. How many people does the average middle-class person know that have been to jail/prison for anything longer than a night? There's a real disparity between what people perceive a prison sentence and its effects as, and what it actually is. Combine that ignorance with the hard on we as a country have for imprisonment, for various reasons, and it seems like that's what you get.
Many authentication systems push all phishing mitigation onto the user, e.g. "check the lock" (doesn't do anything) or "check the address bar" (not realistic for most users, ignores the ability to register official-looking DNS names).

So the answer is - OAuth doesn't solve the phishing issues around authentication any more than any other sort of non-curated hyperlink on the web.

WebAuthn, mutual TLS and Kerberos are the systems where that authentication is bound to a DNS domain or communications channel. Password managers also can provide this, although there are security considerations there such as competing web extensions, and it is a mechanism that the server cannot vet for risk analysis.

Such phishing-resistant mechanisms raise the bar for a successful attack from someone sending out a creative email to something a lot closer to coordinated/state-sponsored attacks on internet infrastructure.
I hope this helps anyone bordering on a decision to shut down their company.
Actually, Schrödinger never believed that the half-alive cat situation could ever occur. He invented it as an example of something that could not happen in real life. Schrödinger thought that the quantum superposition would collapse when the Geiger counter 'observed' the decaying atom by going 'click', not when the box was opened.
Great if you don't have a thick accent, no kids screaming in the back, etc.
> Forming an understanding of the basic concepts rarely happens in 10 minutes

It happens when you're working and have sufficient experience, knowledge and practice when it comes to web, programming and HTTP.

It's impractical, irresponsible and insane to have anyone other than a person with sufficient knowledge to work on application / API that supports OAuth and for person with proper expertise - the protocol is simple because it's literally the bare minimum needed to establish secure request/response pattern.

I work with SAML 2.0 and OAuth2/OIDC, I deal with programmers and other people within areas of API, authentication, authorization and it is true that majority of people I interacted with are having troubles understanding these protocols.
However, what I can attest to is that they're also extremely underwhelming as people working in IT, with bad work habits and misplaced focus. It's impossible to explain or clear up the protocol to such audience because they lack much more when it comes to knowledge and discipline. But, I did interact with several brilliant people with far less experience compared to me who did get the purpose of this protocol and who implemented it successfully and have done so quite fast.

What the wall of text means is that where there's will - there's a way. You can't force knowledge into audience who can't or refuse to understand it, so there's no point in even trying to do it let alone draw conclusions how the protocol is hard, confusing or difficult when there's whole knowledge void in other pre-requisite areas.
Ukraine rapidly expanding its 'Army of Drones' for front line
Different strokes for different folks, I guess. I can’t imagine using a voice command to do something as simple as turn on a seat heater. That feels like way more effort (and honestly more distracting) than one or two button presses that I don’t have to look away from the road for. Don’t you have to hit a button to start the voice command anyway?
Last updated March 22, 2016.

The repo for the "OAuth replacemen" was archived Apr 16, 2019.

Not much to see here. The sibling comment referring to the recent HN discussion is a better resource, IMHO.
Her fraud endangered the ongoing healthcare of cancer patients, famously. With no remorse very clearly.

The public sentiment is based on that, not what subset of behaviors were in her conviction.

Bloodthirsty was a poetic justice descriptor you chose, and it does seem to describe popular sentiment.
Dark matter is really a joint venture between God and ET to bleep with us.
that let me sign up with myhydro@domain

which i am now going to route to trashcan.
I've reimplemented oauth for the same provider (bungie.net) countless times. I think it might seem daunting, but when you break it down into the steps it's pretty simple:

- Send user to example.com

- Eventually they're sent back to yoursite.com with a ?code=abc

- Call example.com/OAuth to exchange ?code=abc for access token and refresh token

- You're done (for now)

- When access token expires, call example.com/OAuth to exchange refresh token for a new access token and refresh token

The tricky part is that a bunch is implementation specific, so memorising the above only gets you half way to implementing with another provider.
What? Canada Post is awesome. I vastly prefer to send/receive packages with them vs. UPS or FedEx. Like someone else said, Canada Post has never lost one of my packages, and in fact, they have delivered stuff that was either totally incorrect (mistake on the sender's part) or nearly impossible to read. It's not very expensive either... Oh, and I've been able to redirect my old address for years for a pretty cheap fee. Pretty sweet.
One of those times where the name is a strong disconnect from reality. "unsinkable" ships, "unbreakable" glass, "cheap" space launches..

It's bulletproof to the limits of LEA reach, but its infrastructure connectivity and reachability is constrained by the wider community reaction. BGP does what BGP does. Same with SORBS and RBL and all the other systems which inject trust (of some kind: I don't personally like some of the RBL behaviours) into the system.

There is massive pushback on "bad" actors. Maybe "Bad" is contextually defined, but "bulletproof" is a marketing label not a reality.

Sealand did not have inexhaustible supplies of food.
Based on this thread I signed up for Kagi and migrated my devices to it a couple days ago.

I’m one that’s ardently against subscription culture in most cases but I have to say im quite impressed.

Im currently on the $10 plan. Not sure if im gonna moved to the unlimited but im definately on pace to hit my limit this month. I never realized how much I search. I do wish the 10 dollar plan had annual options. Even without a discount.

I’ve used ddg for a long time. But even still haven’t been a huge fan of changes and I am one that’s happy to support a project in any way that I can get behind and gain something from from. Either via contribution or in a case like this cash.

I hope you all find a path to sustainability.
>> In my previous job we used Postgres to implement a task queuing system, and it created a major bottleneck, resulting in tons of concurrency failures and bloat

Yet, every month or two an article about doing exactly this is upvoted to near the top of HN. It can of course work but might hard to replace years later once "barnacles" have grown on it. Every situation is different of course.
Usually the voice command is a button on the steering wheel.
Ethan Caballero Reinvented Piecewise Curves and Updated His ML Scaling Pictures
"Although they look fancy, Farah said that carmakers can purchase screens for less than $50, making them significantly less expensive than tactile controls."
Why should I? I had to deal with this mess all the time while alive.

When I'm dead let them sort it all out! Builds character!
Knowning little about the specs required for automotive grade it could be that the tech couldn't handle the vibration, temp extremes/changes and other hardships that car parts encounter. Just a theory.
Remember we're talking about Spain. It's higher, but not much higher:

https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/1043679/numero-de-abona...

Two notes: not sure if official numbers, but it's about paying accounts, not "users" like the original article. And you'll see also fiber companies like Movistar and the Vodafone thieves, that have their own platforms.

It seems the site is paywalled when not coming from search so in millions of paying accounts:

Netflix 9.6
Amazon 6.6
Movistar 3.7
HBO 3.6
Disney 3.2
Vodafone 1.5
Thanks for sharing. I've heard they're good, but comments like this and my firsthand experience with other publications makes me feel better about not subscribing to anything.
The post says the same thing:

> Unfortunately, this early lead would be completely squandered within a few short years, with PyTorch/Nvidia GPUs easily overtaking TensorFlow/Google TPUs. ML was, and frankly is, still too nascent to have significant technical barriers to entry. The sustained eye-popping funding for AI companies generated a surge in supply, with the number of ML researchers growing ~25% YoY for the past decade. I taught myself enough ML to blend in with the researchers at Brain over a relatively short 2 years, and so have many others. Nobody, not even Google, can afford to throw money into a bottomless pit.
What’s state of the art for using ML to understand html docs automatically when scraping them? I’ve tinkered with this: https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/markuplm and it seems useful, but ai and ml is changing so fast right now, anyone know what else is going on?

An example use case: given a url, figure out content type (article vs product page for example), if product page, automatically extract all product details and specs without manually mapping xpath or css lookup paths
Numeral Systems of the World's Languages (2021)
Absolutely critical once you get above a certain table size.
Australia has the worst rural service I've come across in my travels so I wouldn't hold them up as a good example. There are medium sized rural towns with service only from one or maybe two telcos and even then the capacity is often rather limited (one town for instance only had a single 15 MHz LTE channel from an omnidirectional antenna serving the entire town and surrounding region). In New Zealand we pay more than the Australians do but we have service from all carriers to even small towns. In New Zealand towns the same size as the Australian town I mentioned would have a cell site (or even two or three!) from each of our three networks with multiple LTE channels providing LTE carrier aggregation of up up to 50—100 MHz and directional panel antennas. The difference in QOS especially at times of high demand is night and day. In more recent times smaller towns have all three networks cooperating to provide service from the same tower (as part of a joint venture between all three networks called Rural Connectivity Group) making it economical to service small towns with no difference in QOS between networks.I'd rather have the latter than the former IMHO.
Pro Tip: So do ER Doctors and Insurance Companies.

What would be best is something along the lines of a hybrid aircraft controls. See F/A-18 Hornet cockpit. Basically tactile buttons around the perimeter (maybe just side or bottom for consumer), but the options can change. Also for consumers, touchscreen should be a value-add to tactile controls, with hardware buttons as primary. So you could touch-scroll with a finger, but you could also just hit pagedwn tactile button.
> The linked article is literally about

Dude, you couldn't even get the date of the article right.