skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> IPv6 is such a mess.

Maybe.

> If I could go back in time to 1995 I would kick some people at IETF meetings.

Sure.

But how is any of that relevant enough to bring up today? Now, IPv6 is what we have, and the standards are what they are, flaws and all.

The only reason I can think of is psychological: People don’t want to learn new things, so they find reasons to dislike the new thing to be able to pretend they don’t need to learn it.

1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29594017

2. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11137430
The problem is not mvcc but postgres’ implementation details of it.
4 should have been a hand-off to a grown up Short Round, who'd carry the franchise from there. '60s geopolitics were full of conflicts and great power games in relatively-wild regions featuring the ruins of cool ancient civilizations and such, would have been great. Southeast Asia, parts of Africa, some stuff going down in South America, tons of fertile soil for '60s-updated Indy. Put it in the early 60s and Short Round ("Actually, I go by Wan Li these days—Junior.") could start at about the same (fictional) age Indy did in the first three movies.

Instead we got... what we got.
Censorship Industrial Complex
The fight scenes in The Irishman were so embarrassing.
Table Transformer: a model for extracting tables from unstructured documents
> deflation in the cost of entertainment

Or will it lead to an increase in the quality of the results?

Anyone can make a very funny homemade movie on a shoestring budget in their backyard... But those aren't the movies that earn all the profits.

Entertainment is a battle for attention, and whoever spends most tends to win most attention. And the amount you can spend depends on your expected revenue, which in turn is some chunk of everyone's entertainment budgets.

So... If you invent a clever way to make movies cheaper... It won't make movies cheaper to make - it will just make the resulting films more elaborate.
> I have no idea how GP thinks Epic is the gold standard.

Where, exactly, did you read "gold standard"? No one said that. No one hinted to that. The words stated were "great company" and "one of the good ones".
That’s sort of a head-in-the-sand answer, there weren’t these big projects that needed to be staffed up through mid 2022 and cut by end of Q1 2023. I’m sure we can come up with one, maybe? But certainly doesn’t describe what happened
It was near effortless, using the nix dockerTools. The hard part was packaging up all the horrible C++ dependencies involved.

I followed the guide here

https://nixos.org/guides/building-and-running-docker-images....

I ended up with an expression that built an image with my program that took the arch as a parameter.

You can see it here

https://github.com/openenergysolutions/openfmb.adapters/blob... and dig in if you like.
Look up what a “competitive market” is, and the implications on cost to the consumer.

To be more direct, if content is cheap for everyone to produce, then they will have to compete on price to get consumers to engage with their content. This is obvious from both historical record and first principles.

Look at margins in any mature industry with high levels of competition.

Its also clear from history that unemployment created by technology gets absorbed into other types of roles. How can the US have close to an all time low unemployment rate after the industrial revolution obviated so many factory jobs?

People who fight technology have no understanding of history. Some lose, most win
Good karma for a former colonialist empire…anyways, their ceremonial king is a billionaire while the average citizens bear the grunt of the decline.
And he played 39 for the Last Crusade in 1989 (shot in 1988?). Ford was born in 1942 so the de-aging puts him at the same age as the Last Crusade.
Exaggerated might be a better word. It is stories meant to educate kids on proper behavior. The consequences shown in Struwwelpeter are just empty threats parents make - but depicted in that book.

I also read it at age 6 or so.

Many American parents would find it inappropriate for kids given how graphic and negative it is. I think it is a classic however.
Pion WebRTC v3.2.0 Released
Yes. I intended to write exactly this at the end of my post, but I managed to word it completely wrongly. The document describes MVCC as it has been in Redshift until about a year ago, when snapshot isolation was introduced.
thanks for the laugh! :) <3
This appears to be a database of checksums and other metadata about game discs? Not entirely sure how useful that is, but seems cool.
You sure? That hasn't been an issue for me, although I don't know if my parents (in another country) are actually using the account.

The catalog will be different in each country, but that's expected. It's also quite annoying when you get addicted to a show and fly to the other country where it isn't available...
Jon Stewart is an incredible interviewer, he was able to expose Summers praising billions of dollars of corporate profits while completely disregarding people losing their jobs in almost the same sentence.
>"we’re all worse off and we all have to take our share"

Who is this 'we'?

Only the poor and the middle class are worse off and being squeezed by the CoL. The big industry players, ruling, upper and asset owning class are all making bank. Do they think people like Tony Blair or Lord McMansion are affected that food, electricity and gas are all up?

There is no 'we' here.
All of the problems you listed sound to me like earth-engineering problems, except for the "problem" of private property. I strongly disagree with the premise that social engineering raised us from tribal groups. It was agriculture and domestication and fire. The data suggests global farmland is reducing [1] and becoming more and more productive [2].

It is funny that we see things exactly opposite!

1. https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/article/2021/0....

2. https://ourworldindata.org/crop-yields
> 1) When was the last time you fixed networking issues by turning on IPv6?

I've used IPv6 to help users behind CGNAT; enabling IPv6 for client -> server often means those clients no longer go through carrier stateful firewalls and their sometimes tragically low idle timeouts (I've seen timeouts as low as 10 seconds).

I've also used IPv6 to help in a proxy config when I couldn't get the upstream servers configured for more listening ports; it's super easy to get extra v6 source addresses for the proxy servers and harder to get v4 addresses. With high volumes and low session times, you run into port reuse issues at around 10k-20k sessions per {source ip, dest ip, dest port} tuple; theoretically you can get to 64k, but TIME_WAIT takes time to clear and you don't want to be too aggressive.

Probably less going forward, but v6 and v4 often have different routed paths, and sometimes you want to get off of one path and onto another. If you're using a tunneled v6 connection, you almost certainly have a different path for most destinations.

> 2) When was the last time you fixed networking issues by turning off IPv6?

My previous DSL modem would crash when receiving fragmented IPv6 packets. My current one doesn't crash, but adds a lot of internal latency. Temporarily fixed by disabling IPv6; permanently fixed by using the modem in bridge mode and doing PPPoE on my own personal equipment (at great cost to my own sanity, PPPoE is gross, and I built a multi-node redundancy setup, so PPPoE sessions can be transferred between my redundant routers, bleh)
> were the ones who finally cracked the puzzle

What puzzle, precisely? That DNA is a double helix? The article makes it clear that Franklin was already aware of this fact when Watson and Crick had their epiphany. Watson's and Crick's insight that was independent of Franklin had to do with the base pairs, but every article and film and book (including Watson's) and story I know of focuses on the realization that DNA is a double helix. Turns out, that was already known by Franklin and Wilkins prior to Watson and Crick seeing Photograph 51. This changes things. Frankly, I don't even understand Watson's contribution even by his own testimony; Crick and Franklin did all the heavy lifting.
>This doesn't really solve a problem anyone had that fixed location Starlink and Rogers' LTE network didn't solve already

This is for locations with no connectivity, where SpaceX satellites become very low-bandwidth Rogers towers for critical situations. Your examples are not relevant.

The rest of your post is just knee-jerk opposition luddism that doesn't apply at all.
At least on the days when their entire national network hasn't gone offline.
You can run your speech recognizer on AWS, you don't need to give Google a cent.

Whatever comes after YouTube, if it's a startup or not, it will have top-notch captioning, just like YouTube. Google gave up a massive competitive advantage with huge technical barriers.
In what way? I didn't see anything obviously improper when I learned how serialization isolation worked.
Pay $20
> I wouldn’t be surprised if artists (filmmakers, musicians…) create a common fair streaming platform. Let us name it “United Artists“ ;)

That falls under

> And we have now competitors and doesn’t over anymore all relevant content

The core problem is basically owners of IP all wanting to build walled gardens to distribute them (and get all of the cut), instead of just going "pay us X per view, regardless of who you are" which would allow every platform to potentially have everything at cost of having to actually compete on service, not exclusives.
The U.S. Military Relies on One Louisiana Factory. It Blew Up
Fair assessment. There is space for panels, but I suspect I'll need more of them because the duration of exposure is not what it needs to be optimal. This is the turbine I looked at: https://www.amazon.com/ZHIHUASMTBX-Vertical-Generator-Levita...

My idea was to utilize a combination of solar and this.
Anectodally, this reminds me of a discussion I heard coming from a former boss, discussing a team which had two junior graphic designers and one of them was being let go.

He concluded that it was a shame that the one who was somewhat more resourceful, or arguebly slightly more competent tool-wise, was just not at the same level as the other one because that other one you could see that was exposed to arts from a young age, so it could naturally argue about colors and aesthetic in a way the other one just couldn't grasp. He was just He just couldn't see how he could eventually overcome this gap with his peers, and he would most likely have that difficulty throughout his career.
Given that the current prime minister is a non-dom himself… seems rather unlikely to be in his or any of his friends interests.
I don't have GPT-4, but I thought it was available by default to paid subscribers. Is this not the case? Or is there a waitlist to even become a paid subscriber?

Also, does anyone know if Copilot is using GPT-4? I assume it is.
Automate Business Processes with ChatGPT
Who has experience with automation business processes with ChatGPT?
What are the best practices?
Do you plan to use ChatGPT for your company, and how?
Do you need some help with the integration of ChatGPT into your infrastructure?
What is your expectation of using ChatGPT for your company?
How about using already prepared ChatGPT plugins?
If almost every post is an ad, then it makes sense. Like others have pointed out, 70-90% of content is an ad on Meta platforms.

Additionally, user retention has dropped. At the same time, Meta blocked account deletion across its services (Instagram and FB), citing "technical issues." They also said that accounts wouldn't be deleted for 1-month from customer request. Convenient, eh?

So how does Meta report such huge earnings? Well, one way could be that Meta is generating fake account traffic to drive those numbers. Companies paying for ads don't know any different, because you're paying for impressions, not engagement/convergence (e.g., clicks).

The is why people say to delete your account, not just to delete the app. Meta need your account to be active to generate that fake traffic and rake in that ads $$.

Meta isn't the only corporation that leverages this tactic (i.e., generating fake ads traffic using customer accounts). Any corporation reporting a surge in Ads revenue is likely leveraging this tactic.
I believe thats what "family means trust and password sharing" meant.

Everybody knew this was not "legal-base family", it was advantageous for everyone to pay lip service to "family" while meaning "anyone you trust".
You can work your way up in most businesses or start your own once you hit the glass ceiling of credentialism. A tech job may speed that up by paying more, and having lots of docs to choose from, but it is a similar mechanism.
So make sure you are doing PKCE for public clients.

With that, and the redirect URL (and therefore trusting DNS), and the other browser security model stuff…. You’re in fairly good shape.

There’s newer standards coming like DPoP - but it’s probably not worth it yet.
Homework also has the role of letting parents see how you're doing, at least for those whose parents took an interest in checking homework.
"Nm" is the unit of measurement of torque.
and rhetoric:

So how does one work around PostgreSQL’s quirks? Well, you can spend an enormous amount of time and effort tuning it yourself. Good luck with that.
The information might be formally lost for the given token, but remember that transformers train on huge amounts of data.

The (absolute) positional encoding is an arbitrary but fixed bias (push into some direction). The word "cat" at position 2 is pushed into the 2-direction. This "cat" might be different from a "cat at position 3, such that the model can learn about this distinction.

Nevertheless, the model could also still learn to keep "cats" at all positions together, for instance such "cats" are more similar to "cats" than to "dogs" at any position.
More importantly, for some words, the model might learn that a word at the beginning of the sequence should have an entirely different meaning than the same word at the end of the sequence.

In other words, since the embeddings are a free parameter to be learned (usually both as embeddings, and weight-tied in the head), there isn't any loss in flexbility. Rather, the model can learn how much mixing is required or whether the information added by the positional embedding should be seperable (for instance by making embeddings linearly independent otherwise)

If you concat, you carry along an otherwise useless and static dimension, and mixing it into the embeddings would be the very first thing the model learns in layer 1.
Now do gyms
could you link them ?
CGYOOMH was amazing. One of his best most sprawling works.
Hillston is 120 megawatts. Sun Streams 2 is 200 megawatts. Mount Signal 3 is 328 megawatts. The coal fired generating plants that retired in the US in the past decade were often smaller than that.

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=7290

The table above shows that the coal generators that retired between 2009 and 2011 had an average size of 59 megawatts (MW). By contrast, the average size of a coal-fired plant planned for retirement between 2012 and 2015 is 154 MW, more than twice the average size of the units retired during the 2009-2011 period.

In 2022, coal fired generators had a capacity factor of ~48% in the United States:

https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.ph...

Photovoltaic solar farms attained ~25% capacity factor in 2022:

https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.ph...

As a rough guide you can estimate that an American solar farm will generate about as much electricity annually as an American coal plant with half the nameplate capacity. Mount Signal 3 would roughly match a 164 megawatt coal fired generator for annual generation.
AST is already integrated to Nokia's 5G core and Bell in Canada and AT&T in US have signed up with AST for satellite coverage. Nokia is the supplier for both Bell and AT&T 5g core. Also with 3GPP R17 has support for Non-Terrestrial Networks(NTN)
It was probably a bug or unintended, I opted out a while back and nothing happened. I suspect anyone using it at work is opting out.
> The Microsoft acquisition would have likely breathed some new life into the company and allowed corporate to clean up shop.

This is irrelevant to the committee’s decision. The question is if the merger is too anti competitive.
I'd imagine they stick some kind of device fingerprint and only start bothering user if there is too many of new devices that never share same network.

Or maybe ping lan for other netflix app. Or remember the MAC address of router or something.
Find out what the commanders actually need it to do before you spend years and billions of dollars building it.
Epic is neither of those so it doesn't matter.

>Epic is also a great company, but beyond those two when it comes to major developers/publishers there's far more bad than good

I listed all major developers, many of which are owned by mega publishers like Sony.
The jaded cynic in me says - you have achieved true enlightenment when you realize that what the clip is describing just is - it can not be changed or improved upon.

There is no better approach when it comes to large human organization behavior that can be implemented.

You just come to peace with that is how the world works when the population reaches a certain size.

Some over-expensive, over-engineered, over-xyz projects/trials are needed for humans to progress. Even if the specific project is eventually deemed a colossal failure, it can be pointed to as a future reference point of what not to do/waste time on.
I misunderstood both the title of this post and the headline of the article. I thought linen.dev was a chat client!
Indeed, im pretty sick and tired of people making excuses for others lack of financial planning.

Perhaps seeing a big bill dropped on them all at once for their past purchases is the exact wake-up call some people need to track their finances.
The capability here is for 911 connectivity in areas where signal doesn't reach, and emergency notifications for things like extreme weather events or during power outages.
Auth0 has a business incentive to have people think their core competency is more difficult than it is.
And I personally have an 8700k in my home machine.

I work in a large company, I'm not really involved with anything or anyone working on CPUs. I have no internal knowledge of anything in this area.

And I'm just pointing out how the statements of evidence presented here don't naturally lead to this conclusion as seem to be implied - not that this conclusion isn't correct, or some opinion about the quality of the hardware and software involved. I'm trying my best to not involve my opinion, and instead actually stick to the known facts. Which is my issue with this story as written.

I'm not sure if you're reading the same statements, but the ones I've seen explicitly don't admit fault.
You can Frankenstein a few services together:
https://jasondale.me/posts/roll-your-own-streaming-service/
Is this true?

The dev studio of redfall was bought by msft, then the playstation build was scraped.

If true, I would have expected msft to be more cunningly smart, namely to provide a playstation build... but significantly worse than the windoz/xbox builds.

The only way msft could restore confidence would be to provide top notch elf/linux builds of ALL games of ALL its studios (not a few games here and there, and hardly any "significant" ones).

Idem for sony though.
I guess the question is, which MVCC strategy would be the "right" one to pick for a modern relational database? The paper linked focuses on main memory databases, and being main memory allows you to do things you can't do when disk based.
From what I can understand from the wikipedia page for the graph theory trees https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_(graph_theory), what I'm used to calling tree ("computer science trees"?) are rooted trees, and what you described could be called a tree.

Which kind of makes sense, because a tree has stuff that branches out at the top (the branches) and at the bottom (the roots). The trunk has multiple parents and multiple children.

Definitions aside, I like your idea a lot. I feel like it's one of the few propositions that recognizes how important proving your identity already is, and how it will only become more important. The system is flexible and makes sense. It's the kind of thing that I think most people could understand, and thus use.
Oh, I don't disagree at all that Google Brain provided enormous value for society. Just like Xerox PARC. Both of them were a massive drain on resources and provided negative value for the parent company.

And I agree, it's not Google Brain's fault. Google's management has been a disaster for a long time. It's just amazing how you can have every advantage and still achieve nothing.
It doesn't suck, it's literally bare-minimum what you need in order to securely retrieve the token.

It's by far not THE worst, you're spouting total nonsense. What's THE worst is lack of attention, and one needs quite literally 10 minutes to read the RFC and understand it's fairly simple protocol with minimal number of parameters.

I'm sorry you had a hard time with OAuth, but have you ever thought the problem is in you and not the protocol? Reason I'm asking is because you declare it sucks but you are not providing any kind of alternative of how it would not suck.
The two are effectively the same. If you produce a more valuable good with the same or fewer inputs, thats deflationary in real terms.

There will always be content across the quality spectrum. Look at the hundreds of videos of Presidents playing video games or harry potter by balenciaga on youtube. These would never exist at this scale without generative AI due to level of effort required to create them versus ability to monetize the result.

Suddenly many types of content are able to be created in a rapid and cost efficient way that weren’t previously possible. Greater supply of content versus roughly neutral demand leads to lower prices (on average)
> Gradle is smart enough that if we are changing a module, we can build all the dependent ones, and only them.

I rarely build big projects, we usually create multiple small ones instead and if necessary reuse through artifactory or something, but unless I misunderstand you, this is exactly the same as Maven does in a multi module project, isn't it?

> The cache system comes into play when someone is changing something: when a developer is updating the code locally with changes from other developers, they don't have to compile and run tests of modules they are not changing locally, as gradle is downloading automatically the changes from the build cache.

But why should other developers have a relation to the source of dependencies except for debugging?

Isn't it better to upload the packaged jars to some kind of artifact repository at the end of their build pipeline?
Promising Israeli Startups – 2023
The grand parent didn't say anything about selling or returning the DVD for a refund, so how is shifting formats to something more durable piracy?

If it's just a backup I can't see any ethical reason why you shouldn't be able to do this.

We went through all this in the courts when we got the rights to timeshift recorded TV programmes.

Comparing it to stealing food is ridiculous. No body has been deprived of anything, it's just copyright violation.