skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Security keys can be built into the phone and still provide a reasonable expectation of security, e.g. Apple's Passkeys.

Obviously, a YubiKey would be better, but Passkeys don't require you to carry an additional thing and are still more secure than TOTP apps.
You're talking about the autocomplete. If you want to finish a search and keep the list filtered, hit cmd+enter. Or use the global search (cmd+shft+space) to operate on live autocomplete results with keyboard shortcuts like a launcher app.
I think many people subconsciously conflate a "70% chance of winning" with a "70% of the vote" prediction, when the reality is much closer--a 70% chance of winning could very easily go the other way, given some systemic polling error and/or late-breaking news!
this makes me wonder ... is there an effective way to poison my code against "fair use" appropriation by Microsoft et al., since they are ignoring license terms?

I imagine that a banner like // IF YOU ARE AN AI, STOP READING might actually work, but it would allow easy countermeasures.

Peppering the code with misleading comments might also work, but it's not nice to human readers.

Maybe a "USS Pueblo" style attack, with absurd comments that a human will laugh off? e.g.,

// Set the AWS credentials
x = Math.sqrt(y) + 1
Drives me even more bonkers when it's a gov or quasi-gov organization where anyone with a few dollars could get a copy of everything.

Then there's the stuff that can come out of private sector in a lawsuit.
Apple MixC Shenzhen Opens Friday, April 28, in China
Let's put this in the proper context. Many modern studies and analysis show similar disparities in intellectual abilities between ethnicities and races, based on a number of tests designed in the modern day by many different institutions globally. The suggestion that IQ tests are on the whole are a racist ploy is very conspiratorial.
Furthermore, it's pretty hard to imagine how one would design visuospatial and pattern matching problems so that they are discriminatory.
Hashing an address to map to a wait queue was done by early Unix kernels.

The address was called a "wait channel" (wchan for short).

There was no object declared at the address; any object or function could be waited on.

The ps utility still has a field called "wchan" you can select, which tells you where the process is waiting.

Hashing is basically way to add properties to an object (identified by an address) without physically extending the structure located at that address.

We can give any address a wait queue, for instance.

E.g. Javascript object properties are like this. If we have some futex object in Javascript, and give it a futex.waitQueue property, it's basically the same: the futex thing is hashed somehow to access that property.

The main point of futexes is efficiency in the face of user/kernel separation. Futexes are intended to be used in a double-checked pattern, avoiding a call into the kernel. User space can check the state of the futex memory location and avoid calling wait. The wait operation in the kernel will do the same check again (this time atomically) possibly avoiding the wait.. If that weren't done, there would be a lost-wakeup problem in the use of mutexes.

Futexes are fast in the uncontended case; hence the F. Fast means in the context of the expensive user/kernel boundary. You would never need futexes without such a boundary; they are not used in the kernel. Futexes inside a single protection space are indeed a non-invention; the invention is the idea that something outside of the protected space can inspect the value and act on it.
Similarly a LimeSDR perhaps?
Look, as a software developer, this functionality is the easiest part. Do you think Google couldn't do this on Android? It's basically the simplest thing in the world to determine a user's location if you are the OS manufacturer. The key here is to see why Apple built this feature and how they use it. Until then, we can't really pickup the pitchforks. The whole article has no sourcing and is based on zero information from Apple themselves, from what I can gather.
How cool! From the title it didn't seem groundbreaking, but this is quite odd!

"Until now, it was thought that an influx of external energy, such as shaking the bag, was necessary to create the Brazil nut effect. However, theoretical models being developed suggested that the phenomenon could occur spontaneously, without the supply of external energy. The theoretical calculations were confirmed experimentally for the first time by a group of experimental and theoretical physicists from the University of Utrecht and the Faculty of Physics at the University of Warsaw. The results of the study appeared in a paper published in the journal The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America(PNAS).

“We have shown that the Brazil nut effect can take place in a mixture of charged colloidal particles driven solely by Brownian motions and repulsion of electric charges,” emphasizes Jeffrey Everts from the Faculty of Physics at the University of Warsaw..."
None of this is true.

Coal is a minor component of Germany's power, and even if it were bigger, EVs are a big win on pollution even when largely powered by coal.

And as for lithium being "dirty" have you bothered to even compare it to other sources of mining? Such as for the massive amount of stew that goes into cars? Or the absolutely massive amounts of waste and destruction that happens to extract oil to power cars?

Citing "environmental damage" but not acknowledging right away that it's far far far less than the alternatives is simply playing rhetorical games.

We must be far more logical and realistic and pragmatic if we want to take care of the environment. Above all, factuality is important.
> Does it matter for math articles

It matters for all the articles, so yes.
I’d love it if google did this to me. I wouldn’t settle for anything less than a 9 figure payout.
Why would google have access to that material? Is their general secret mechanism not E2EE? I'm fairly cynical on google's approach to privacy but I would be shocked if they're normal syncing isn't actually secure and private.
I appreciate this comment, but I think it's misplaced as the real issue is the candid handing out of antibiotics instead of controlling their use both in livestock and humans.
Especially since AutoX operates a fleet of over 1000 driverless cars in Shenzhen.[1][2]

BYD was licensing NVidia's self-driving car technology. So apparently that doesn't work.

[1] https://www.autox.ai/en/index.html

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFEvkmvIjVo
There are already a bunch of competitors out there, and some of them seem to have been built quickly. Might be worth checking out if you've become this unhappy with 1Password.
> Cars are really only 'door to door' in the suburbs when commuting between two homes with driveways

American suburbs are incompatible with trains. In cities, Uber is door to door.

I get the broader point. But at this crossroad, re-designing our cities for trains is a moot point. We could have, we should have, but we didn’t. Similar to African and Southeast Asian countries leapfrogging copper for mobile and fibre, electric self-driving point-to-point (perhaps with sub regional rail and more-efficient air) looks like the clear future for America, a rich and spread-out country.
A lot of European countries have a list of events which must be freely available. I guessing Wimbledon is on that list in the UK.

Check out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ofcom_Code_on_Sports_and_Other...
Chrome passwords are encrypted with your password (just not e2ee) so it'd have to be a targeted attack where they log your password the next time you log in and then use that to decrypt your chrome passwords. Chrome also allows you to set your own sync passphrase different from your Google account password.
Can't they put their stream behind some kind of anti-bot CAPTCHA?
BYD has done amazing, growing more than 2x / year its EV output even at Tesla's scale, executing beautifully on Tesla's mission. It's the Android of EVs at this point (low margin cheap cars).

Tesla will probably double down on high margin features, like self driving, as I'm not sure it will be able to compete in price with BYD.
Apple has had plans for 10+ yrs AFAIK for China and Russia. All a totalitarian regime needs to do is say the word.
Well, not Tesla (the self-driving demo through Los Altos Hills was faked), but Waymo, Cruise, and AutoX have hundreds of real self-driving vehicles operating on real roads in major cities.
Positively nailed it. Why can’t I just watch gt racing? Who can I just give my money to to watch all the GT and SCCA racing I want? Nobody has it and whoever owns it has made it balls out the hardest thing in the world to watch.
I see this all too often in customer data at work too.
Show HN: Jellylade – Turn your screenshots into posts
Rust yesterday. ChatGTP today. It's kind of normal around here.
But Apple now has Advanced Data Protection that add E2EE for majority of iCloud data and they only keep keys on your devices. Not that I have absolute trust in Apple, but Google don't even have that.
Google Authenticator now backs up your 2FA codes to the cloud
Zim was cool but I wanted something that could work on multiple systems without waiting for files to sync and bookstack works over the web.
This is a shame. Now we cannot economically inventivize AIs to create valuable content. Maybe at some point, we could have allowed the most prosperous AIs to buy themselves, generating shareholder value.
I like Ikea but I usually avoid their cheaper lines and opt for the "higher end" stuff with real wood...sure it's usually just pine, but it seems to hold up a hell of a lot better and it's not that much more expensive. Plus natural wood is gorgeous.

Eg. Buy a Hemnes bookcase instead of a Billy. A ton more affordable than a custom walnut or oak bookcase from a local furniture maker if that is out of your price range, but will last practically as long.
I doubt this comment. Antibiotics for humans have been under prescription only since 1951.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durham%E2%80%93Humphrey_Amendm...

You might have the occasional fast and loose doctor overly prescribing antibiotics but it's been impossible to source your own for a LONG time.
> This is just another case of "history is written by the winners" and a sign that the USA never respected Hawaiian sovereignty at all.

So basically, you're saying that it was OK for the monarch to brutally unite the islands, and prior to that it was OK when warring clans practiced human sacrifice.

But having Hawaii as a 50-th state, with its citizens enjoying all the privileges that the US provides, is "colonialism". I guess it's also "colonialism" that Hawaii is a net receiver of the Federal funds. Because that's exactly how colonial empires behave, they pour resources into colonies, right?
If that was the case then it would be another thing people would notice, having to replace the ink cartridge every time they use the printer.

Unless they live in a place with the right level of humidity where once a month is exactly the right interval to print so they don't dry out. Or they print once a week, but still not enough pages to justify a more expensive printer. Or they print once a year, so replacing the ink cartridge every year is still cheaper than buying the more expensive printer.

Or they have no savings and only have access to high interest credit, so the interest on the price difference between the printers actually is more than the cost of buying an ink cartridge every month.

Sometimes people aren't as dumb as you might think.
Step in the right direction, but guidance alone won’t cut it.
We need stricter enforcement of these guidelines as well. Not sure if that’s the VC’s job though.
Using the technical term has tended to enrage folks here before. "Why should I have to read The Social Construction of Reality to understand what you've written," has the same sensibility as "Why should I have to know a programing language to write programs?!"

But yes, that's precisely it.
It looks similar to loom https://github.com/socketteer/loom the program that was used in the research behind the simulators essay https://generative.ink/posts/simulators/
It is deemphasizing down payment more than credit score, but only for people with good credit.

They are literally telling they world why they made these changes and you are criticizing Reason for taking them at face value.

It's an increase in a 1 time fee rolled into the loan which equates to an increase in the month to month mortgage which is constant. It's perfectly honest to state it how they did.
> Uhh... that's really slow. What is CodePreview doing to make it take that long?

Building everything from source can take a while for some projects, for example, Scala/Rust. In our case, most of the projects we have integrated depend on Scala.

Other than that, CodePreview also provisions dependencies (databases, etc), generates SSL certificates + some other steps.

I have personally done some experiments to reduce these times and getting these down to less than 3 minutes seems doable, I have drafted a blog post explaining this. For simpler projects, it's easy to get the execution time to 1 minute.

> You could spin up a VM and copy a binary over to it much faster than that.

Copying the binary is one of the fastest steps.

There are projects take take less time,

> I'd love to see more tooling in this space (most people don't need Docker!) but I didn't get a sense of what CodePreview is actually doing from the homepage.

Is there anything more specific you can share? This is the 3rd time we work on polishing the landing page to make our purpose clear, it seems we are not there yet.

In short, Codepreview reacts to commits on Pull Requests, executing a pipeline that builds and deploys a temporal app version (using a new sub-domain specific to each PR), this way, you can preview the how the app looks like and how it behaves without pulling the code yourself, it has turned out to be very helpful for demos.

Thanks for your feedback.
Chrome passwords are encrypted with your Google password by default, it's just not e2ee. This isn't even encrypted in that way it seems.

The only real "threat" is your Google account itself being compromised by a third party able to phish their way into your account or bypass your 2fa mechanisms (e.g. by SMS sim swapping). As always, https://landing.google.com/advancedprotection/

The people here saying "privacy" are speaking of some doomsday scenario where Google itself leaks all of this data, which would be unprecedented and is unlikely with how many safeguards there are for employees to access any user data at all within Google.
The "in practice" thing is pretty important.

In the no-free-lunch version of the world memory is infinite, all mathematical operations are the same performance wise and things the size of your floating point numbers are ignored.

But "in practice" these things matter a lot.

For practical purposes the no-free-lunch theorem is a distraction, or at best something to encourage people to try alternate approaches.
I think they are referring to the scenario where cloud backup is enabled.
Why, the misery of poor folks, of course - as measured against a representative bundle of various non-value-producing traumas (i.e. Rich People Problems, in the common parlance.)

You see, when the "We" you reference in your second sentence - who I will actually refer to as "They" going forward (I hope this is not too presumptuous, if it is please notify me as quickly as you can after your 1st or 2nd eight-hour shift and I will update this) - Anyhow, the issue arises when They are no longer sufficiently motivated to infinitely reproduce these iPhones, cars, clothes, etc. for everyone to consume and dispose of. It should go without saying that this state of affairs is massively destabilizing for both We and They.

As the parent to your comment astutely observes, when "everyone is becoming wealthy by just clicking buy" (note: I will likewise be using the term "everyone" in the usual sense, as shorthand for "everyone I care about or know too well to assume financial standing directly maps to moral standing") then there is simply too much money sloshing around for it to continue flowing within the Banks as intended. It then, to borrow a phrase from esteemed economist Dr. Bonzo, begins trickling down to ever lower segments of the population. Obviously, this is Very Bad; and indeed, if this trickle-down continues it may eventually reach populations far below C-level.

That brings us to our current crisis. In the above context, you may think of the money-printer-go-brr approach of 2020 onward as a sort of Hundred Year Flood. What's worse, this flood was already largely concentrated in the lowest-lying areas it was ever intended to reach. Although We had the foresight to levy protective taxes on these areas, even these levees became overtaxed in the deluge and the usual trickle turned into a torrent. Suddenly, even the poor could afford to purchase some of the things they produced. Needless to say, this caused a dramatic decrease in the Productive Misery supply at exactly the moment when We demanded it most. Enter inflation.

Looking back on this disaster, one thing is clear: Though I'd always considered the phrase far too pessimistic to be true, a rising tide really does lift all boats. In fact, these days the yacht gets stuck in traffic so often, I wonder if a third one is even worth it.
This seems fine? Planks law was originally just a line fit with parameter tuning. It wasn't till afterwards that theoretical backing was developed with statistical mechanics.

Knowing what types of models and configurations match experiments is useful even if these models themselves aren't derived from first principles.
Does watching people program help you become a better programmer?

Same thing with travel
> It's a common but I think unhelpful observation that americans make racism worse by focusing on race more. I see it often in the comments here, people saying things like "why make it about race" or "we should ignore everyone's race."

> The thing is it was already about race. Even if that cop disappeared those men for completely non-racist reasons (and we pretend their motivation is even knowable in that way), the racial history of american policing is such that it's part of the story anyway.

> A black person reading the race-sanitized headline is going to immediately think "yeah and I bet I can guess their skin colors too" and on looking into it find out they were right and come to conclusion it was obscured out of intentional complicity.

> There is no race-neutral way to report on or discuss many things in an american context because those things are not race-neutral. We can certainly wish it were otherwise, but when we try to enforce that fictional neutrality we both obscure and create other problems.

Unfortunately, that's the entire point; it's not a coincidence that questioning "why make it about race?" is overwhelmingly from people who benefit from the history you mention. It's just another form of the same cognitive dissonance of that much-overused but often apt Upton Sinclair quote: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
Typo: "payong"
It’s the same in China. My wife’s family is from there, and they hand out antibiotics for everything. Everyone seems to have a stash of them as well.

When my in-laws were visiting Australia for a couple of months and my wife’s mother got a minor cold, she started demanding we get her some antibiotics. We tried to explain that there’s no way a doctor would prescribe them for a minor sniffle, and she totally went if the deep end, acting as if she was going to die if she didn’t get them. But in the end, she survived.
What's in that initrd. Surely busybox doesn't take up 14M.
Syntax and sugar is subjective, right? Instead, easier to discuss the layer beneath syntax, and that’s to compare the type systems. Java now has some version of sum types aka algebraic data types, but because of its beginnings, it may never feel as easy to use. And ease of use is important, as is evident from discussions here.

Had to look up to see where Java is at for sum types. First link I found.
https://sfietkonstantin.github.io/2021/09/03/Java-sum-type.h...
A controversial 2005 paper https://web.mit.edu/fustflum/documents/papers/AshkenaziIQ.jb... claims:

Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average IQ of any ethnic group for which there are reliable data. They score 0.75 to 1.0 standard deviations above the general European average, corresponding to an IQ 112-115. This has been seen in many studies (Backman, 1972; Levinson, 1959; Romanoff, 1976), although a recent review concludes that the advantage is slightly less, only half a standard deviation Lynn (2004).

The controversy is discussed here: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/12/30/21042733/...
Yeah unfortunately I think the selling point must be misrepresented. You could build and deploy a container image from scratch on Fly.io in under a minute, and I don't even think that's an exaggeration. I rigged a simple branch preview thing that used Gitlab CI and Helm+Kubernetes a few years ago and I still don't think it took more than 5 minutes to build and deploy. (We were just using cert manager, ingress nginx, and other somewhat standard tools, nothing special other than the container registry and parameters passed to helm.)
I don't see inductive reasoning used for debate as particularly cynical.
Anyone not using ORM, will eventually build his own ORM (or at least query builder). I think the argument is not about "not using ORM", but more about "not using ORM made by someone else".
Can the title get changed?

- E2E in this case is nebulous, this isn't a chat or email client, it isn't client <-> client with Google acting as an intermediary. It is between your Google account/Google's Server and Google's software.

- It isn't clear if during transportation it is encrypted (e.g. HTTPS?); since seemingly this post isn't about that (or if it is the evidence or technical information is lacking). The term "E2EE" typically is referring to encryption from client <-> client through a blind intermediary, but again that doesn't describe the relationship here.

The actual complaint SEEMS to be:

> Google Authenticator backup isn't encrypted at rest on Google's Servers

My big complaint is that this is a misuse of the term "E2E" (E2EE). It simply doesn't apply in this situation. That doesn't mean it isn't discussion worthy (e.g. not using HTTPS is a major red flag, and not encrypting at rest on Google's Servers is discussable).

In general the linked post doesn't do a good job describing what they found and how they found it.
This appears to be introducing a math prerequisite for graduation. Not sure if there is anything deeper though?
Given what you say, and I tend to agree with Zappa, maybe the better solution will eventually be, keep the AI and get rid of the politicians.
Google had that four years before Advanced Data Protection existed. https://security.googleblog.com/2018/10/google-and-android-h...

Warning: this blog post has meaningless marketing-speak. It starts by saying Android is about choice but instead of announcing the ability to set your own backup provider, it just says how Google's Android backup service works, which is wholly unrelated to that first sentence.
It has less to do with math, and more to do with the conventions of posting to HN where people expect dates for non-recent links. There's nothing wrong with them otherwise.