skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A Netflix account is supposed to be one per family, it was never supposed to be tied to an individual person. Who in their right mind would assume that a package that allowed four simultaneous streams would be for a single person watching four shows at once?

No, it’s clearly supposed to be that one account covers multiple people. GP is fine to complain whether they have enough money for two houses at once.

What about kids who have divorced parents and stay at a different house on the weekend? Do they need to get two separate accounts because “their parents can afford two houses?”
In the 90s I didn't have to give Rare $5 to play as oddjob, and another $5 to make heads big, and another $5 to fight slaps only, and another $5 to.....

That's the difference. Those games were $70 because the ROM chips nintendo forced you to use were basically unavailable at sufficient quantities. Playstation games were cheaper despite being able to use literally 10x the amount of assets.

The only people forcing AAA studios to add a billion polygons to every stick are themselves. They haven't tried anything different, so of course they think it's the only option. Meanwhile billions of dollars a year go to people who spent $10 on an asset in the unity store to back up a game that actually is interesting.

Actually, even worse, they often AREN'T wasting millions on assets. Grand Turismo 7 has plenty of cars that are just copy/pasted from the previous release.
To be fair, this seems like a very convenient redefining of "household". If a household can, quite literally, span two houses (and states!), then what does household actually mean?

Edit: double checked and Netflix today is clear that plans are for a single "household". No idea if that language has changed over time but I vaguely recall them always referring to multiple "devices", not people.
https://www.eetimes.com/tsmcs-arizona-culture-clash/

> they are doing even more than 12-hour days often

Running the fabs sounds like a shitty job for chumps. Stick to node.js.
So, in brief, you don't have any legal citations to support your claim that training an AI is not fair use.
Thanks for taking the time to explain. I'll check out the link also.
> Also TSMC is planning to open outside Taiwan soon.

This is true, but most of their capacity is in Taiwan, and will remain in Taiwan for some time.
Need? No. But they can invest cash on hand into things that have a higher yield than the base interest rate, and operate the business using loans at the base interest rate.
Hard disagre.

For me the European content has been the fun part and much more exciting than boring low effort shows like Chicago $THING.

The two last shows I actually enjoyed on Netflix were both french (a very secret service, and call my agent)
> T-Mobile and Verizon both use CGNAT

FWIW Verizon FWA does NOT use CGNAT for IPv4.
Python is the least of my concerns with Tensorflow... especially TF 1.0. What a mess it was, and kinda still is.
Analogies compare dissimilar things with a common attribute

Up to you to figure out the context or point out how there are no common attributes, or just how you don’t understand it for clarification, there’s almost never a reason to unilaterally correct a person making an analogy
Because 'xyz engineering' consultants can charge a lot more $$$, and 'xyz writers' are all being replaced by AI ;)
You might be misunderstanding the use of sin-cos in early positional embeddings. The waves are shifted such that each position gets a unique positional encoding. These encodings are not relative in distance to other positions, they are at best ordinal. They are meant to provide the same flexibility for the model as absolute positional encoding that are learned (so, position=2 always gets the same encoding) - which is what they achieve.
The matter of learning about distances between positions is left up to the later stages of the model.

This differs from the much more modern approach of relative positional embeddings, for instance Alibi or Rotary Embeddings.
These I think fit your intuition much better, as they seek to encode relative distances between tokens correctly.
200 not found
SQLite? That has an extensive test suite and has been extensively vetted/checked.
I found doing a custom (without a library) OAuth integration for only one service relatively straightforward, i.e. when it’s not treated as a standard. For example for a plug-in exclusively for Shopify (random example, didn’t try it) you would just treat it as the rest of their API and write custom code.

In short it works when you can see it as a guideline instead of a standard.
It would be so easy to link those 6 reports.

One more report I can find is this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/12yq4yb/megathread_for...

But they said they didn't enable EXPO, which is directly counter to the current theory being pushed by Toms

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/12yq4yb/megathread_for...
TBH, I know of a lot of people sharing beyond their family...
But why does it devolve?

You talk about "arguments backed by serious research" versus the "conservative" crowd; but AFAI see those types of posts are flagged anyway, possibly brigaded.
Ask HN: Anyone else see GPT-4 access as unfair?
GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 are worlds apart and having access to GPT-4 (API) is a competitive advantage.

Like countless others, I've been on the waitlist forever, and seeing other companies get access to GPT-4 means my project is on hold while they're moving ahead.

Am I the only one who sees this as an unfair practice by OpenAI?
Me.

100 years ago: 0 scientologists
now: conservatively, at least 100 scientologists

As for the portion of the population that has no or limited religious affiliation, I'm not sure that mean it will keep going down, versus comes into some kind of equilibrium.
the existence of santa claus is a "belief"

climate change isn't
>Totally. With DDR5-6000, it's even nastier: AMD repeatedly said that DDR5-6000 was the "sweet spot".

And the specs on their own page say DDR5-5200 is the max memory speed, WTF
According to who? [1]

https://www.psychologytoday.com/ie/blog/old-school-parenting...

[1] The WHO?: https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
IoT networks come to mind. There is nothing like 6LoWPAN for IPv4
Agreed, but... Paramount refers to it that way as well.

"INDIANA JONES AND THE RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xQSIdSRlAk

Get ready for edge-of-your-seat thrills in Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark.
Paying an overhead cost of 53 bytes per row is also too expensive for MVCC in my opinion.
Oh good grief! You cannot be serious!?
> For non-Canadians, Rogers is the largest but also the absolute worst mobile/internet/tv provider in Canada. They routinely use grey area tactics to both bully competitors, and even bully customers.

I mean they're expensive, and anti-competitive, but their products and services are very good.

Think of them like Canada's Verizon.
Consider that the issue isn't overall teacher salaries, but instead how teacher salaries compare against other professions in other places.

Have you ever seen Software Engineer salaries in the EU? Way less than America. Probably not much more than their teachers.

So if teaching is making the kinds of income that your top earners are, it becomes a lot more likely people will go into teaching than trying to go earn more elsewhere.
Come on, that is just low effort trolling.

In any client you have the option to see "everything" that is passing, and it is a lot from just about every topic to the tab where you only see the people you follow.

Next time to a better effort to bad mouth Nostr.
Cashflow is hard ... On the one hand you must pay 200,000+ employees everywhere in the world at regular intervals without fail. But on the other hand, the cash to do that is tied up in various places, it's in a different country, it's in various interest-bearing bonds or shares that cannot be redeemed quickly, or it's even in future revenues that you've not received yet. And it wouldn't be efficient to have a massive cash float on hand in country-specific bank accounts, when that money could be invested profitably.
Investors are willing to put a premium on growth, even if it means the company is unprofitable (for certain definitions of unprofitable — you have to be convincing that you could be profitable, if only you stopped spending so much on growth). If you're unprofitable and losing users you're in trouble.
The name and title should let you buy (or borrow) it, but I just found this preview: https://books.google.com/books?id=umXEDQAAQBAJ&printsec=fron...

Here's the US Amazon link: https://www.amazon.com/Stop-Guessing-Behaviors-Problem-Solve...

Not affiliated.
This perfectly describes why I refuse to ever re-subscribe to the New York Times.
My intention is to send free digital updates to those who purchased the original 2012 PDF via the website, I have a list via fetchapp.com. I will probably remove this message for the new version. Print editions or other proprietary ebook formats (like kindle, etc) will be for purchase only for the new version. More: https://github.com/nature-of-code/natureofcode.com/pull/42
At least they unlocked the creativity of whoever produced that documentary.
Why deage when we can just have AI replace them entirely?
Moreover, I am on a large instance (social.coop) and living happily -- I pay a monthly fee and I'm confident it'll last pretty much forever (they also have a governance plan, which I find important!). I also support mastodon itself. Given the number of large servers that are financially healthy, [1] I don't expect this trend to break so soon. Given this voluntary nature however, I think the devs might be underestimating the importance of low running costs... but at scale I'm sure efficiency will improve (in the last case through alternative servers!).

I'm more genuinely worried about Mastodon and other parts of Fediverse forgetting why they were made in the first place. They are made as a network for the users, not for selling ads. They can make every decision with the users wellbeing in mind and this is incredibly powerful in today's world. (if they stick to that, I'm sure they'll find a lot of success)

Selling out as the author seems to suggest would make them into a boring Twitter clone as far as I can tell.

[1] not only mastodon.social, also others like mstdn.social, fosstodon.org, and more -- if not, check with your instance maintainer :)
"Have you tried kill all the poor?"

https://youtu.be/owI7DOeO_yg
This seems rather unlikely. I-57 parallels the old Illinois Central rail route, with a jog to the west and then south every time it needs to avoid a town along the railroad. It seems rather certain that the southerly sections are perfectly straight because they take over existing county roads, which are a perfectly square grid of streets thanks to the Land Ordinance of 1785 and Northwest Ordinance of 1787.

This approach would have resulted in the absolute minimum cost of acquiring the land to build the highway, so it is probably why I-57 looks the way it does. It's pretty easy to imagine that the only reason I-57 exists is as a political quid-pro-quo and therefore they'd try to build it as cheaply as possible. If you wanted to go from Chicago to Memphis & New Orleans, you could take I-55, but then you also have to go through the state capital and St. Louis. So instead, if you live in the politically-powerful areas on the Southside of Chicago (where the first mayor Daley lived - perhaps the most powerful mayor in America back when the Interstate system was started), you could have a highway built specifically for you! You don't have to waste time driving past the people you hate on the west side, you can skip the people you hate in Springfield, you can skip the people you hate in St. Louis, and then the Interstate ends when it connects back up with I-55 north of Memphis.

PS - Chanute got BRACC'ed about 30 years ago.
what a blatant dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35714194
the jacobi identity is [x,[y,z]] - [[x,y],z] = [y,[x,z]] ie. it says the lie (pronounced "lee") bracket is almost associative but you have to add a [y,[x,z]] when you rearrange brackets. it has absolutely nothing to do with disambiguations.

hope that helps lol
The last sentence talks about “setup” and “users”, so it sounds like both. It later mentions WebView2, but it’s not clear if that avoids the situation entirely…
I was thinking about this the other day as my family was watching the Obi Wan TV show.

Darth Vader is in it, and he's a composite of I think only two actors this time; Hayden Christensen doing the physical performance, and a James Earl Jones-trained voice filter on him when he was in full costume. James Earl Jones got a line in the credits, but I'm not sure he read any lines.

Got me wondering if LLM technology and its successors might yield fictional character/actor composites that no longer correspond to physical people anymore, Hatsune Miku, or Gorillaz-style. If there will be a time when Darth Vader is credited as being performed by Darth Vader. He already is a composite as it stands.

When too for the Marvel cast?
google has the same thing - purchase approvals so your kids can only request to purchase stuff, not actually purchase it
LTE does perform authentication of the tower, it's one of the reasons cell site simulators are becoming less useful---phones that refuse a downgrade to 3G will refuse to fully associate with a simulated site, so only limited information about the phone (some identifiers) can be obtained.
1) None of these are grid scale.
2) All of them are heavily subsidized.

The closest I see in that list is Mount Signal 3, which comes in at about 1/3 the capacity of a typical grid-scale generating station (1/6 if you account for the fact that it's producing zero power half the time, on average). It also chews up nearly 2,000 acres of land.
The only deflation will occur for the producers and corporate owners. You, me, and everyone else will pay the same prices while 95% of these who went into making movies will be unemployed.
> The other thing that Netflix dropped the ball on was the Spotify-esque "1 site to rule them all". There's now Disney+, Paramount+, Hulu, HBO, in the UK, BBC, ITV, E4, Sky, and so on. Movie + TV companies have always fought each other in a way that record companies never did, but both their products are just bits down a wire in 2023

Netflix didn't drop the ball; it was clearly never going to happen. When Netflix launched their streaming service, I thought it was a dumb idea because I figured it was 10 years tops before all the major studios could run their own streaming services, at which point Netflix would have no content to stream (unlike mailing DVDs, you need permission from studios to stream their content).

Most of the movie studios jealously guard the rights to their movies; Netflix got a lot of its early streaming content by sublicensing from Starz, which pissed of the studios (most notably Disney, but there was murmuring from Sony as well). At this point, Netflix invested both in TV back-content as well as creating original content.

We are now entering an era in which Studios can potentially have complete control over legal distribution of their content, and they look likely to do so. I'll pause for a moment while you try to buy a copy of the (now 3.5 year old) Mandalorian season 1 on DVD or Bluray...

I'm not sure why music ended in the "(almost) 1 site to rule them all" while video did not, but a couple possibly contributing factors:

1. MP3s had a one-two punch of coming practically out of nowhere, and portable players that significantly improved on the walkman/discman experience. Napster wasn't even around that long (2 years, 80M users at peak) but planted pirated MP3s as a big deal. Then the iPod came around and being on iTunes was important to stay relevant. If you're on iTunes, why not be on all streaming and purchasing services at the same time?

2. There is a long history in the US of compulsory licensing of music for various purposes. It doesn't cover on-demand streaming, but does cover satellite, terrestrial radio and "internet radio" services.

3. Retail media sales have long been the public metric of success for music; for film studios it's been retail ticket sales. The music charts even have formulae for translating streams into equivalent purchases of physical media.
https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/expo

Scroll down, open footnotes:

> Overclocking and/or undervolting AMD processors and memory, including without limitation, altering clock frequencies / multipliers or memory timing / voltage, to operate outside of AMD’s published specifications will void any applicable AMD product warranty, even when enabled via AMD hardware and/or software. This may also void warranties offered by the system manufacturer or retailer. Users assume all risks and liabilities that may arise out of overclocking and/or undervolting AMD processors, including, without limitation, failure of or damage to hardware, reduced system performance and/or data loss, corruption or vulnerability.

On their own page they consider it warranty-voiding feature that they ADVERTISE and PROMOTE

> Now I'm considering disabling EXPO, but I don't think it would work as 6000 anymore after that. I have used this machine for 4 months now, so I'd say it's pretty safe, but who knows, I haven't taxed the CPU with gaming yet.

I'd drop it, wait till it all blow over, upgrade the BIOS, and re-enable it. It does seem like just a firmware bug or maybe some OC profile on memory being overly optimistic with voltage.
> Another problem with the autovacuum in PostgreSQL is that it may get blocked by long-running transactions, which can result in the accumulation of more dead tuples and stale statistics. Failing to clean expired versions in a timely manner leads to numerous performance problems, causing more long-running transactions that block the autovacuum process. It becomes a vicious cycle, requiring humans to intervene manually by killing long-running transactions.

Oh man, a previous company I worked at had an issue with a hot table (frequent reads + writes) interfering with autovacuum. Many fires over a six month period arose from all of that. I was (luckily) only on an adjacent team, so I don't know the details, other than vacuums taking over 24 hours! I'm sure it could have been prevented, but it seemed horrible to debug
> native culture

Nope, America largely exterminated its native cultures hundreds of years ago. The culture that exists today is the immigrant culture of nation founded on ideas (freedom, slavery, capitalism, democracy) not bloodlines. America can be for anyone who wants to be part of that story.
Somebody print this comment out, frame it, and mail it to every major API author.
But you just listed companies that aren't even comparable; they're at entirely different market capitalizations. FromSoft and CDPR are babies compared to Xbox, Sony, Nintendo, Activision, EA, and Epic. FromSoft has a rough valuation (its hard, because they're owned by Kadokawa) of maybe the low nine figures. CDPR is larger, in the low billions. Epic is like $40 billion. Activision, clearly, around $85B. EA, around $35B. And Microsoft/Sony, obviously, a lot, lot more.

Team Cherry and concernedape are also extremely amazing and ethical developers. But they aren't peers to the companies we're talking about. Its easy to be ethical when you're small. Its laudable to maintain a sense of those ethics when you're large, even if the absolute measure isn't a perfect score.

Nintendo is far scummier than you let on; they're among the scummiest video game companies on the planet. It just doesn't come through in their fantastic and "pure" gaming experiences; but the fights their legal team chooses to engage in are ugly, despicable, and very unique among gaming companies.
moving the latency to the player client just makes everything feel terrible. its like playing in mud because your actions take 50ms-100ms of time to show up on your screen
Well, 20 years ago it would have been "can you be confident that Outsourcing won't displace you..."

If you're the type of person to worry, you'll always find something to worry about.
You have tapped into a logical fallacy. A is associated with B. B is associated with C. This in no way indicates that A causes C. It just doesn’t. You have to show that A and C are associated, then you have to determine causation. You can’t skip steps.

I see this all the time in nutrition “science”, and it is just bad science.
> ... as the telcos here are oligarchs.

There's one part of Canada that pays about half of what everyone else pays for cellular service - thats Saskatchewan. Because Saskatchewan has a government-run cell carrier, SaskTel.

Canada just needs a federal crown corporation to offer cell service.
> The issue is that the judge invented a market that nobody considered to be a market before the trial.

Not true. I'll just quote from the ruling:

"Epic proposed two single-brand markets: the aftermarkets for iOS app distribution and iOS in-app payment solutions, derived from a foremarket for smartphone operating systems. Apple, by contrast, proposed the market for all video game transactions, whether those transactions occur on a smartphone, a gaming console, or elsewhere. The district court ultimately found a market between those the parties proposed: mobile-game transactions—i.e., game transactions on iOS and Android smartphones and tablets."
The ads are in the browser interface itself
> how peaceful it is to use their platform.

> You can browse without anything auto-playing

What? Has this changed recently? I mainly use their AppleTV app, and sometimes their web app. With the AppleTV app, there are a bunch of thumbnails that look like DVD covers. When you swipe over to one of them, at first nothing happens, but just as you're about to move to the next one, the one you're on expands shoving everything to right off the screen. Moving one-to-the-right, then causes everything to collapse down again for a second, until the newly selected thing suddenly expands for no reason. It's incredibly spastic and makes it very hard to get to a specific item.

I could have sworn it auto-played a preview, too, but I might be misremembering that.

If that's changed recently (I haven't browsed the app since "The Last of Us" ended), then great! But using it for the past year or two has been a non-starter. I just look up their shows in the search section of the AppleTV and add them to my Up Next queue so I can avoid interacting with their app at all costs.

Hulu and Netflix seem to not be so painful to use. AppleTV+ used to be perfect but a recent update made it equally unusable. I set the Home Row on my AppleTV to be my "Up Next" queue, and now only interact with the TV app from the home screen. It has less functionality that way, but it also has none of the suckage.
I wish there would be a rude awakening, but for so many they will just attribute their failings to everything but themselves and there will be many who enable them.
There's been so many ills in this thread & it's all so very very Tea Partyist, that the way to win is to get people to not believe in government & the way to get people to not believe in government is to be an awful awful government that cancels services, is unbearably cruel to people, that broadly disenfranchised as hard as it can.

It's sad to see the loyal opposition fall into such disloyal treachery. Now we have radical extremists in power & welcomed in to a major party, I he voice for a sizable chunk of America. And actively working to undo the Union.
what would be better approach?
> you ask it to repeat the new prompt?

I thought that was understood. I basically ask it to improve my initial prompt, like asking it how could I have asked this better. Sometimes it gets good results, like when it taught me how to pose formatting to it. I did not know how to make it output in a certain user defined format, it never occured to me that I can just give it an example, the modified prompt taught me that trick. Now it's super common everywhere and I think is the basis of a lot of langchain.