skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm aware that there is more to Rust than enums, and that you were using that as an example of a correctness feature that is part of a gestalt of correctness features. My point is that people have been arguing that more expressive languages with stronger type systems will be better able to model problems and thus avoid logic vulnerabilities, and that hasn't panned out at all.

Since I don't think there's any evidence to support your point that's a Google query away from you, I guess something you could present that would weaken my argument is an example of a recent meaningful sudo vulnerability where idiomatic Rust, written in the manner that a typical Rust programmer would use to solve the relevant problem, would have foreclosed on that vulnerability. Obviously: we pre-agree about memory corruption vulnerabilities here.
This is what I constantly tell people. Use GraphQL to efficiently create permutations of access so the data is shaped for the client more or less exactly how they need it. To that end, I often recommend that at least one UI developer is involved in approving schema changes and regularly dogfoods the GQL setup before its deployed.

I have been met with a lot of resistance around this notion for some reason.

To be honest, I fought the same argument with OpenAPI (Swagger) too.

API developers seemingly just want to chuck their schema over the wall and walk away
I'm a trekkie and love the nostalgia of LCARS, but let's be honest: as an UX, it sucks (it's for show, not for usability).
Observable Plot: A JavaScript library for exploratory data visualization
It was probably pork right from the start: built in Wisconsin and Alabama.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/07/littoral-com...

I guess the Coast Guard didn’t even want them?

https://maritime-executive.com/editorials/op-ed-a-derated-li...
The IPv6 Buzz podcast had a recent episode[0] making the claim that IPv6 is happening on your network whether you intentionally enable/control it or not these days and I had a similar reaction to the one in the post. Definitely something to think about though if you’re in a position to worry about such things.

0: https://packetpushers.net/podcast/ipv6-buzz-123-why-you-need...
I've watched Woody Allen's Midnight in Paris, with Owen Wilson acting like the usual Woody Allen insert. Good actors can convincingly imitate other actors.
OpenID Connect, specifically, where a lot of people mix those up and start looking at using OAuth for authentication. And if I'm not mistaken, logging out is implementation-dependent in OpenID Connect. There's some pseudo-standards but implementations vary in my experience. And OpenID Connect also has multiple flows for different kinds of applications. There's still a lot of confusion and complexity here.
You're thinking about employment contracts like an abstract economic exchange between two free parties, which is very micro. Try thinking about it instead like a bargain with the (macro) devil.

In other words, consider someone's perspective who has society split into two camps: the people who do all the work, and the corrupt elite that make their living through theft and oppression.
In such a world, signing a contract with an employer (i.e. capitalist i.e. elite) is more of a practical step than a sacrosanct bond.
There's a level of "what's reasonable" and "what legally enforceable" beyond the basic "never break a promise" level you're working at, IMO.

No ones endorsing publishing trade secrets randomly, but you're treating all disclosures like they're equivalent.
Hogwarts Legacy certainly looks good, but the mobile game hogwarts mystery(or something like that) by the same studio was full of dark patterns and also devoid of actual gameplay.
1) Last week

2) Never
> Math, when there's no parent at home capable of properly explaining it if the kid gets stuck, doesn't sound like a very productive use of time.

It lets the teacher know how well students understand a concept so they can spend more time teaching it, or get a student extra help at school.
Yes you need it for the RockBLOCK too:

https://docs.rockblock.rock7.com/docs/iridium-contract-costs
That is why there is a terminology section: https://metacpan.org/dist/LWP-Authen-OAuth2/view/lib/LWP/Aut...

If you're trying to write a Mastadon client, then the Mastadon service is the service provider, you are the consumer, and the people who wish to use your client are the users.
Although the UK has an unusually low tax-to-gdp ratio compared to its neighbours, so it's probably not that.
Bringing up deepfakes is a bold move when the quotes are on earnings calls and written across the screen of promotional videos on Tesla's own website...
where did you get this?
seems private chats are not a thing. which is a dealbreaker for me coming from Discord. I asked in support so I guess we will see.
Are there any banks that offer subscription cancellation natively?

I feel like it's a feature that could live at that level rather than deal with these patterns. Within the bank's app, a list of recurring payments or 'subscriptions' with a cancel button. Cancelling results in a failed payment authorization response to the merchant psp the next time they hit you for $, who can then treat it as a cancellation.

Or does it not exist because incentives.
Milton Friedman really did a number on people. Has any of his ideas stood the test of time? Everything I’ve seen has led to rampant inequality, and rot in both the corporate and government sectors. Even in the most recent economic crises, zero countries embraced his ideas, and those that tried austerity had a worse outcome.
I think your expectations are too high. During our initial exploration we actually managed to talk to Todd Miller, the maintainer of sudo. In our (brief) interactions with him he did not sound cavalier like this at all. Instead I think that a lot of the issues with sudo are more about it being a thirty+ year old program and codebase, and sometimes features turn into bugs and security issues all on their own in such time periods. But then again, C just cannot offer the kinds of protections that Rust can, and mistakes will be made eventually by every human, better to have some protection from your mistakes than none at all.
Honestly the way OP just throws out a scary-sounding 'well this is an obvious bug that abs can return a negative number', without giving the context that it's for the minimum value of a machine int type, really says it all. He doesn't have an interest in evaluating it fairly, he's just doing a hit piece.
That's all clear to me. But technically there exists a method to revoke an issued token. It's just that long lived tokens mean potentially lots of them == increased storage cost. It would be pretty silly not to check for revocation. How would one implement logout otherwise? Relying on just clearing session cookies? What if I obtained those cookies using something else than a browser and I can hold on to the cookie jar? Not checking for revocation == doing it wrong.

The purpose of a refresh token to allow the app to short circuit the login process. Regardless of how long the token is issued for. It's perfectly okay to ignore refresh tokens altogether, if one wants to.
I started to subscribe to The Economist online and when I got to the payment info thought to check how hard it would be to cancel, and it turns out there's no online way to cancel, you have to talk to customer service rep. I read a number of reports about the process and some were absolutely livid about getting the runaround trying to cancel.

I contacted support to check if this had changed and not only did they confirm that there is no way to cancel online, I was told that this is actually for my benefit! This was conveyed with a lot of corporate-speak trying rationalize the decision (or just confuse me).

An organization being greedy is one thing, but I really don't appreciate being gaslit about it. It's too bad because I like their work, but I won't support these kinds of business practices.
For service accounts, email is clearly not the right choice. I don’t have experience with enterprise auth, are Kerberos etc not using company email for human identity?

> this proposed system requires that every app has ability to send emails, which honestly is less simple than it sounds

For humans and especially end-users of consumer services, my observation is that the elaborate auth dances are using email ownership as last resort anyway, ie for account recovery and/or a trusted 3p that has verified the email. So the thought is simply to make that flow more convenient. Perhaps this is misguided.
>...glibc needs python to build itself, but python needs glibc.

Surely there must be a glibc which predates the Python dependency. Why can they not build the prior glibc version and use successive releases to iteratively build up the platform?

Not technically satisfying, plus probably some turtles-all-the-way-down situation where there was a pre-Python dependency which is equally hairy, but conceptually, I do not understand the limitation.

Too late for the mountains of existing software, but I know Zig took some effort to address the bootstrap problem by relying upon a WASM seed.
I was pretty surprised to see that advertising actually, definitely caught me off guard to see Vodafone changing their name to One NZ (for example) and then this news to provide 100% coverage.

Which I suppose would be good for those very rural farmers. Maybe places along the west coast/milford/fiordland would def benefit from it. Guess it's one of those things we wait and see how it gets rolled out. And boaties I guess. Basically anyone who can't connect to fibre, and that fibre rollout is pretty extensive as it stands!
> Of course at the end of the article they offer a solution - their product (and of course it’s AI enhanced)

We have been working on automatic database optimization using AI/ML for a decade at Carnegie Mellon University [1][2]. This is not a gimmick. Furthermore, as you can see from the many comments here, the problem is not overhyped.

[1] https://db.cs.cmu.edu/projects/ottertune/

[2] https://db.cs.cmu.edu/projects/noisepage/
IIRC, ripcord works perfectly fine as a Discord client (used it myself for some time) - but if you have ripcord and Discord clients running at the same time, logged into the same account, Discord's anti-spam measures are triggered, and your account gets banned.
Discord support refused to reactivate my account, so I had to pester the Discord security lead on Twitter - who was so nice to reactivate it.
What makes you think that isn't the ultimate goal? Little by little CGI will cross more lines. Fully virtual actors are probably the wet dream of Hollywood.
YouTube is the big one there. But you can still share YouTube content on the Fediverse.
Paired with the autogenerated questions which require upgrading to check.

One might as well use Duolingo, they have an interactive story feature which I feel does a better job than this (despite how poor I believe duolingo is for learning a language.)
Perhaps, the IPv4 space is easier to police?

IPv6 Transition/Co-existence Security Considerations, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4942/

Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9099/
I'm really hopeful that Netflix implements password policing in the US, so that I have an excuse to stop paying for my in-laws to use it.
"You" in a geological and time sense are almost nothing.

Fill the room your in with dead-body clones of yourself, it will probably take well over a hundred.

Collect all the humans on the surface of the Earth, they'd all fit inside Rohde Island (thanks XKCD). Humanity is a tiny fraction of the mass and surface area of the world.

You've been alive for less than 100 years and only seen, heard, touched or felt the smallest fraction of the surface of the Earth. Met a tiny fraction of the people.

Time wise you're limited to 80? years of cognizant thought. Maybe 90? Humans have been around for thousands of years, and earth has been around for billions.

Yet, we as humans claim parts of nature as our own. My land, my country, my trees, my pet rock. All those things aren't yours and never were.

The poem just imagines what would happen if nature suddenly decided to reclaim what was always hers.
sounds like pure manipulation. buy puts on Deprebit or other exchange ,release fake rumor to tank price, delete/retract rumor.
Thanks.

The crustiness in this case was enhanced by my grumpiness over some frustrating debugging sessions, and having to go through a lot of very confusing documentation to get there. That grumpiness shows through in a couple of places.

For example I understand why Google decided that I was asking for the same permission too often, and began handing me codes that would not work. And also wouldn't explain what was wrong with the code that I just got.
Pricing Engine vs. Billing Engine
Good to know. I’ve been waiting for access but am happy to pay.
"... we enrolled 20 adults" ... for 2 weeks?

Is that really all it takes to produce a study now?
Bitcoin crashes, retraces gains amid unconfirmed US Government dump rumors
True, but only in the long term. Cutting edge AI will continually provide a competitive advantage and access will result in better products.

Once the diminishing returns of improvements drop off or when it gets "good enough", then it won't matter.
A “higher order prime sieve” indeed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sieve_of_Pritchard
I'm not conflating different phenomena I'm talking about sensitivity readers and the recent wave of editing all books to be more pc.
Submit an Ask HN?
No one knows but I’m mostly on your side on this. Ships defence systems have been lagging behind offensive capabilities for a long time and that’s not even talking about the threat posed by submarines.
where are these prompts from?
> The US conducted zero RCTs

I'm sure many researchers would have loved to do more controlled research, but for some reason people weren't lining up to participate in trails where the participants get infected by Covid and then try to infect others in a lab setting. This is one of those things where it should be easy to devise high quality experiments, but ethics make it impossible.

In the end we got a bunch of people doing the best research they could. That meant studies with serious flaws and limitations. Some variants spread more easily than others, the amount of community spread varied with time/location, some people didn't make it all the way through studies, mask usage couldn't be constantly monitored to ensure compliance, etc. Most research looked only at how many people got sick when masked or unmasked instead of how the virus spread when already infected people were masked vs unmasked.

We still managed to come up with a ton of research (including RCTs done elsewhere) which, taken in totality, showed that any kind of masking helped to some degree.

> Maybe it helps with other common viruses that spread through large droplets on surfaces, but for an airborne virus like covid that spreads almost like measles it might not at all.

Covid also spreads through droplets, but generally airborne ones. Getting any of those same droplets stuck to surfaces like the inside of your arm or the inside of mask keeps them out of the air other people breathe, but obviously you can't get all of them.

Since how much virus gets breathed in matters, reducing the amount of droplets that go out into the air can mean the difference between getting someone sick or not, as well as how sick they get if their immune system can't respond fast enough to prevent the virus from establishing a foothold in the body. I think the effectiveness of cloth masks declined as the virus evolved, and N95 masks were always going to be the better option, but anything is certainly going to be better than nothing.
I'm going to wait till Gamers Nexus tells me what to think about this.
Verizon, who are well known for being affordable, honest, and "with the times", has announced they're going to bring back "cable" subscriptions - you give verizon a flat rate, and they get you all of the streaming services, presumably for less than you'd pay for them individually.

Yes, the first part is obvious facetiousness.
Setup a confidential information & inventions assignment (CIIA) agreement to protect the IP created for the company, alongside the rest of the employment agreement.

Also, if your concern is judging their character, consider adding another person that you trust into the interview process. Either as a technical or behavioral round.
Question: Why would I need more than one extra version of the same row? I would think that with transactional locking everybody else is waiting on the first update to commit before getting their own changes in, unless the db is somehow trying to lock columns-per-row instead of entire rows.
During the NAFTA 2.0 negotiations, Trudeau allow Rogers and Bell to claim they are Canadian Media companies and not telcos giving them protection against American telcos and made sure that Canadians will never enjoy the same rates US Consumers enjoy by offering this protection. It's the same for many Canadian industries that can operate without any competition from the US.

I don't think anyone in the US can even fathom the prices Canadians are charged for the service they get. My $80 Googlefi plan (4 lines) would cost around $500 plus a month in Canada.
IKEA doesn't have investors, it's actually structured as a Dutch nonprofit.
Why 480?
A couple things that I would imagine add to the cost with federation:

Bandwidth costs for user content. You aren’t just hosting the content of 10k users but caching and serving the content of everyone you federate with.

Either that or the software would have to be very inefficient.
Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35667282
The issue isn't about Brexit making the country materially poorer, the conditions existed long before Brexit, it's the main reason for the Brexit vote in the first place.

Sure we can trade a bit more, but when the whole economy is financialised to a massive degree, then any benefits of that trade (if that trade outweighs the negative effects) are funnelled through a long standing system of extracting profit and concentrating wealth.

there's pretty much nothing you can do in your private or public life that doesn't result in a net transfer or wealth from the household, the local economy or from public funds, through a highly complex system of extraction.

So not only has people's purchasing power gone down, because purchasing power is relative to the money you have vs the money others have, but also basic services have just gone away from being free at the point of use. And what is free at the point of use is both low quality (so you are incentivised to pay to get a better service), and is again a black hole of public money being funnelled away thus reducing your purchasing power.
Reminds me of that Monty Python episode where they suggest taxing all foreigners living overseas.
> The product is ridiculous regardless of the CEO.

It's amazing. The most fun I've had in a vehicle in my whole life, and absolutely worth the purchase price. I'm sorry you aren't impressed, really, and I genuinely can't understand why there's so much hate about something so great.

But none of that is relevant here. The question at hand is "is it safe?", and the clear answer is "yes, quite".
Replit Unveils LLM with 2.7B Parameters and 20 Languages
Honestly this was their initial promise when the community was super niche, it was two things:

- Normalized money transfers independent of the regular financial system

- Reducing currency interchange fees

Bitcoin was suppose to be this electronic ledger store for valuation to facilitate these things, as I recall.

Really got away from itself
A similarly wild thing to think about is that Pangaea was just the most recent supercontinent. The landmass on earth has split and merged several times.

Time. It's deep.
Use today could be in turning older non-HDR images into HDR NeRFs, but also as a foundation that somebody else will build something completely new on top of. Who knows what that may be.
> Have you actually ever used Twitter? That's literally the first thing that has existed in Twitter. It's the oldest part of the entire service. It has always existed.

In the beginning it existed, then they forced more and more other tweets into the timeline. So then it didn't exist anymore -- until Musk took over. Third-party apps may have never had other tweets in the timeline, but they weren't widely used I believe.

> Highly dubious reasons such as what?

For example reporting factual but politically incorrect crime statistics.

> Also, remember when Musk banned people for posting links to Mastodon? Where does this fall on the "free speech" spectrum?

He reversed course in just a few hours. The old Twitter management were fond of certain censorship for years. Not just in blocking accounts, but also by doing things like acting as a direct arm of the FBI and performing political censorship on the Twitter trends (this was in the "Twitter files" which were ignored by the media, because people on right were affected, while most journalists are on the left).

> I don't know where the "split" part comes from. The checkmark didn't actually do anything. It was literally just "we checked that this publicly notable person is who they say they are".

The meaning of the checkmark became "this person is notable". Not generally that this person is who it appears to be, because verification wasn't open to everyone. The meaning of the checkmark was determined by the thing it was correlated with, notability, not realness.

> Elon is the one that is trying to split Twitter into the paying and the non-paying by making sure that the non-paying are made much less visible. Freedom of speech if you just fork over the $10?

I think the visibility difference mainly comes up for the "for you" tab, not for "following". It seems some reasonable compromise. They have to earn some money somehow after Musk was forced to pay an inflated price for Twitter (after his initial offer the stock market including Tesla tanked, which made him poorer and Twitter worth less, but he had to pay the old now-inflated price, he wanted to back out, but the Twitter management didn't let him, even though they opposed the deal just weeks earlier).

> And yeah, journalists were also verified because they tweet about a lot of news from their accounts, and you want to know that "@johndoe from New York Times" is actually John Doe working for the New York Times and not Sergei in St. Petersburg.

In my experience journalists just post their opinions like everybody else, they don't post more news than others. They just enjoyed having the "notable" sticker, a very pleasant association.

> And how does that work if a famous account is new?

That almost never happens. They may endorse it from somewhere else. Im sure it's simply an imaginary problem. I've been on Twitter before there was any verification and it wasn't a problem then.
The air-cleaning qualities of plants get a genetically modified boost
3nm is HARD. Everybody will fumble. TSMC is fumbling now and Intel will fumble it later. 2nm, 1nm will be even harder and expect more fumbling.
Check Rajat Monga's LinkedIn profile. He's no longer with Google.
IKEA is structured as a Dutch nonprofit. There's no shares.
also I wasn't really talking as if there's not fix for it, but the sabotage of MS on the UX of their flagship product. It feels cheap and not pleasant to use if you're bombarded with ads and stupid cortana-stuff.

I really don't like the painting of business leaders as heroes, but here it feels a little bit appropriate: I bet steve jobs would have fired you on the spot for this. And the managers under him would have never dared to do this and still don't.
Yeah, sort of. We're also counting on increases in productivity. Although these have also not been forthcoming.