skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Does it? If you pretend IPv6 doesn't exist, sure, but that's like pretending UDP doesn't exist because all of your applications use TCP, or only logging traffic going to port 80 because you don't have HTTPS yet.

Every firewall I've come across has a default deny rule for incoming IPv6 traffic, giving the firewall the same properties as any IPv4 network. Host firewalls are the same; anything ranging from Windows Firewall to UFW and firewalld have presets to block all traffic except for the applications you've whitelisted. Once you get to huge enterprise routers managing routable IPv4 addresses and IPv6 addresses the situation may become different, but it's still not that much overhead.

The biggest problem with securing IPv6 seems to be ignoring it assuming that makes it disappear. If you configure your firewall to drop all IPv4 traffic not on a whitelist but somehow manage to forget to add the same rule for IPv6, you should re-evaluate your networking knowledge and maybe get up to speed with how the internet has changed since 2015.
> If you can't trust your team mates to make changes carefully, then your version control system is not going to fix that for you.

I don't trust myself either; trusting your own or others code is hubris. The two-person rule - or more - is applied EVERYWHERE.
Tbf most iOS users spend $0 in the App Store on an annual basis. I don’t think I know anyone who’s spent money on an app.
Review submission?
> but in practice most shops still have a £100 limit.

I've not found this to be the case anymore, sometimes the terminal will display a limit or the merchant will believe the limit applies to phones, but no limit is technically enforced.
It took me too long to understand this. I always felt pressure to get things done so skipped reading the manual. Turns out I would have gotten more done had I just read the manual.
> If I were the most gruesome capitalist ever, I’d be a socialist.

Both models match to some extend (i.e. potential to make life hell for everyone), when all productive capital is allocated to a single company.
If you are using mutexes or other well defined abstractions, you need to care little about ordering.

If you are writing atomic based code, you should be using something like C++11 and C11 atomics that will take care of fencing on all platforms.
Depends on the scenario
> Spanish, French, written Chinese, etc. all had a monarchy/dictatorship of some sort to mandate the change and enforce its use.

There is no central authority over the Spanish language since the days of Bolivar and San Martin (1810s or so). Modern e.g. Argentinians would laugh at the idea that Real Academia Española has any say on how they should use their language. And indeed, there are differences not just in vocabulary and pronunciation, but also in grammar: "vos hablás" instead of "tú hablas".

Nevertheless, I can pick pretty much any written Spanish word and know how it sounds both in European and Argentinian Spanish.

It is specifically English which failed at the task of not being like Chinese.
Data modernization in the banking and finance sector takes on new urgency as administrative changes and pressure continues to increase the cost and complexity of managing legacy unit.
Hehe, I make the typo all the time! I need to consciously remind myself: Generative Pre-trained Transformer.
curl on windows is my fallback to telnet (which is even less likely to be available on a clients windows computer)
to quickly check connectivity and address resolution without having to install anything
Elon can be quite the polarizing individual but the hate and pessimism is just too much and frankly down right embarrassing.
> Yeah, but we're bored.

Worse than that. They had completely dysfunctional internal processes that they decided to solve by going people shiny toys to play with (Rust and Electron): https://blog.1password.com/1password-8-the-story-so-far/
Were your grandparents billionaires?
It makes Toyota more open than Rolls Royce though. ChatGPT for free is amazing. $20/month is a steal. OpenAI could easily have chosen to be TotallyClosedAI, charged way more, and not have released it to the general public, leading the general public to flounder as tech elites suddenly became more productive, leaving everyone else behind.

Also, don't forget, it's only due to the Magnusson act and other acts that we have rights beyond what Ford wants to grant us on our cars. (Since Ford was the one in that lawsuit, Toyota came later.) If it were up to manufacturers, the hood would be welded shut, we wouldn't be allowed to use aftermarket parts at all, and they'd take a cut of every Uber ride.

I don't see Congress acting in the case of OpenToTheGeneralPublicAI and ChatGPT, unfortunately, but the car analogy falls short because software isn't the same as physical goods. Toyota's info about what cars are doing after being sold is limited, but they have to get them in the hands of customers. OpenAI can just let customers use ChatGPT via the website or an API and it's usable by customers.
Sort of almost right.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust,_but_verify
i don't think that will work because of the large moment from ax strikes that aren't perfectly dead-on, but i'm interested to see your results
Actually hairdressers will probably be impacted also because people would like to see how they will look like after their haircut :)
Yeah, but this article is about Apple Pay, not Apple Card.

If you have a card with someone else and you use Apple Pay, your information is sent to both Apple and your bank. If you just use the card, only your bank gets it. I can't stop my bank from doing whatever with the data, but there's no reason for Apple to get that data from me for free. Sure, it might be smarter to switch banks, but if you're unable to do that, why give Apple the data as well?
And to extend the last point: before it is merged, to keep the mainline in a releasable state:

1. Continuous deployment means your mainline is sacred and always in a releasable state.

2. Unit tests and automated verifications only tell part of the story

3. Churn should be avoided (e.g. fixing code style issues); if fixes are made before it enters the mainline, it is avoided.

4. Code reviews should be asynchronous, because pulling someone out of their flow to switch to doing a code review is rude and unproductive.
I didn't say it's evolving in an insane way, however I believe the outcome improves when more people with different perspectives discuss on a matter.

In other words, "If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together".
that actually is a solution to many problems though
my barber already charges more per hour than me, this hits hard :D
TBF lots of companies don’t do machinery maintenance either, at least not to recommended standards.
Supreme Court: Will Blocking on the SocialWeb Remain Legal for All in the USA?
It's not really a difficulty though is it, for VC funded unicorns who ask forgiveness and move fast. When the law catches up, if ever, they'll pay a slap on the wrist while sitting on their superyachts
I am a noob here, so maybe this is obvious, but how exactly is a "lock" defined? it seems to me the acquire/release semantics are very similar to locks? I.e. I'm struggling to understand what is "lockless" about the primitives.
The way it can end well is that the spec gets more and more precise due to the combined efforts of independent frontend implementers.
Your complaint is about FaceID, not Apple Pay.

I tap the side button twice, then enter a passcode whilst the cashier is scanning the items. I then scan my phone when it’s time. Maybe taking a card out is 3 seconds faster but I haven’t benchmarked.
I have invite codes if people want to join, send me an email: sam at elborai me

So far it has been very friendly and wholesome, hope that will work out in the long term!
Also, when you're working solo, PR's are just a great way to look at a bunch of changes before you smoosh everything together because even with a full history it's sometimes tricky unpicking everything.
Amazon is not a person, and cannot kill someone by raising its hand and stabbing them in the spleen. So, what evidence exactly are you asking for?

Are you implying that this word game ("Ha! Amazon didn't literally kill him by a physical attack!") somehow changes anything in terms of blame?
Or are you just arguing semantics for the fuck of it?

> this is just a case of mis-using the word "literally" for dramatic effect

No, this is you not understanding that words have different meanings in different contexts. Amazon has literally killed them, as in, performed a manslaughter. The fact that it is not a person only changes the mechanism - instead of stabbing them, they performed gross negligence. Why you consider that a "literal manslaughter" must have an element of physical assault is beyond me, but in the end, it's just your own definition of the word.
In Spain, renewing the passport is very fast and cheap!
> It's slow, but it works.

This is why so many people cannot fathom things like rocks cut accurately or large structures like pyramids, Stonehenge or the Moai; they don't consider what can happen if you spend days, weeks, years on something. I think it's evidence of this claim that people back when had much more spare time for things not directly related to their survival.
> The engineering of complex software systems is often the result of a highly collaborative effort. However, collaboration within a multinational enterprise has an overlooked legal implication when developers collaborate across national borders: It is taxable.

I guess this also affects employees of companies without multinational presence that work remotely from other countries.
Thank you! That's honestly very helpful.
Its not just firewalls.

Its also all kinds of code that interacts with the internet in all kinds of ways. Extending all that code to two kinds of IPs, writing tests, setting up two types of IPs in development, staging and production, monitoring real life implications ... that would be a huge cost with no benefit at all.
They send the hash of the master key password after it's been encrypted to the server. They then encrypt the hash on the sever side to auth you. They don't send the password itself.

What that article is saying (rightfully, mind you) is that an attacker can mostly ignore the server side round of encryption, because if they have a copy of your local vault, they can just perform the client side rounds and then see if they can decrypt the vault.

This is a problem mostly if you see their claims of 100000 rounds server side, and decide "oh that's fast enough, I'll drop the client side rounds to 5 so my vault is fast to open)"
Elon Musk's giant SpaceX Starship rocket leaves crater
C++'s type system is turing complete, and there seem to be plenty of successful independant implementations of that -- although they do often disagree on how many programs are executed.
End of the internet as we know it. Everything will be fake. Maybe-human-zones will be created (again... by startups) but nobody will be sure whether there is actually a human on the other end.

Face-to-face experiences and carefully planned group activities will start to earn a "premium" status. People will be divided: the ones who prefer the virtual and the ones who prefer the physical. The ones losing the physical contact in the process will experience more and more mental health problems over the years.

The biggest impact will be on the election process and democracy as we know it.
I think any talk about which parts of our lives will be affected is underselling the enormity of the issue.

Life as we know it will end. Humanity as we know it will end. It could be because of an AGI takeover, or because of a few individuals harnessing extremely powerful AIs for their own ends, but there is no path forward that doesn't end with most of humanity either dead or enslaved.

Sure, you will likely see industries collapse, huge numbers of people losing their livelihood etc., along the way. But that's nothing compared to what will come shortly afterwards. A humanity where most humans are effectively worthless is unthinkable, yet that is exactly what's going to happen.
Ask HN: Publishing NPM packages takes hours?
Recently I'm experiencing hour long delays on publishing public npm packages under organization.

I'm using local, command line npm publish (not ci).

Cli says everything has been published instantly.

However package with that version cannot be installed for hours.

Re-publishing same version says that version has already been published.

Npm status page looks green with some small note yesterday (24th Apr 2023) that there were some problems with publishing "Partial outage of package publish". This issue seems to be not resolved at all.

It's quite frustrating to see most of the time status pages green while systems are not working at all (are they for investors or developers?).

Anyone experiencing similar issues with default npm registry?
> Mac/Apple only customers have this strong inclination for some kind of Stockholm syndrome when it comes to software and devs going shitty and hostile.

It's exactly the opposite of what you wrote. Mac users abhor the software that turns shitty. However, as on all modern platforms, there's no choice: all software is turning shitty.
> TRISO particles. Each of these small particles (which are about the size of a poppy seed) is comprised of uranium, oxygen and carbon covered by ceramic and carbon materials. The particles are then formulated into larger cylinders or spheres (depending on the reactor design) for use in reactors.

This sounds quite much like the PBMRs (pebble bed modular reactors) proposed by Eskom (IIRC). The primary technical objection to those was the risk of a graphite fire, which could be VERY difficult to extinguish. Does this new technology under discussion here have any similar risk(s) ? 3000F - is that sufficiently hot for testing purposes ?
It is a little hidden still. On your profile page there should be a sign up link that will take you to Stripe. Feel free to email me. I will post two solicitations tomorrow, one for annotation work and one for plate photographs.

It is restricted to US only right now (Stripe setting) but I will change that if there is non-US interest and the country is supported.

I've only run through the whole process once so hopefully there are no hiccups. Thank you!
Hypercode.com is worth a look, i think
They're tradeoffs in cost vs cut / appearance in a lot of cases. In part thanks to the panny-D, I've taken to wearing PJ trousers and 3XL oversized shirts (but in a cut that doesn't make it look baggy), they're comfortable but I wouldn't want to go out wearing them. Okay the shirts are acceptable.
I don't think locks are the reason it wouldn't count. Otherwise the Thames would end at Teddington.
I've heard some people express the view that the SEC is currently willfully undermining due process by continuing to posture but without taking formal action which would entitle the targets to gain access to judicial review. (With an implication that they're doing this because they know their position is likely to be found unlawful.)

It's a similar accusation that I've heard lobbed against the executive branch in recent years: announce a forthcoming executive order, which would be plainly unlawful and ripe for a court to halt but then don't actually formally issue the order -- denying anyone standing to bring action over it. This achieves the intended, unlawful, effect via parties that comply out of ignorance, in preparation, or out of fear that it might suddenly take effect and leave them in the wrong.

I haven't looked into the details -- and don't even know if enough are available-- to figure out if this position is well founded.

Putting aside the due process angle, there is also a parity consideration. The market benefits from clear, enforced rules because absent them the parties most willing to violate the rules while pretending to comply have a competitive advantage. The more clear and the better enforced the rule is, the more level the playing field. It may well be better for coinbase to end up with a decision which significantly restricts their business so long as its clear enough to have the effect of restricting their competition as well -- while it's in the grey competitors with less to lose will be in a better position.
Sounds like the website you are currently on does the trick.
If I read that correctly, does it mean that Epic can now direct you to a website to buy in-game currency outside of the reach of Apple's 30% bullshit tax?

That sounds like a major win against Apple.
> but nobody will be sure whether there is actually a human on the other end

If that is true, why would it matter?
I have ask: where do you run your models, and how do you keep them... Deterministic? We have run models in a variety of environments from cloud to edge, and the only way we've found to do that is with ONNX.

Tensorflow has breaking changes in model behaviour on patch versions!

Pytorch and tensorflow require a huge python environment to run, and how on earth do we get that onto a client system without them having virtualisation?

Worst of all, they both have very significant changes in prediction depending on the CPU (or god forbid GPU) on the system.

Once we export to Onnx we find we get reliable output and performance across runtimes, which seems mandatory for running any kind of product.
Break loops were a relatively common ;-) feature in Lisp. Many Lisps had an interpreter in the REPL (with the option to compile code on demand) and in case of an error, a new 'break REPL' comes up with added debugging features and ways to leave it. This also allows more levels: an error in a break loop calls another break loop.

The addition of Common Lisp's Condition System (and Symbolics's 'New Error System') was to provide a machinery to handle errors and to provide interactive restarts to the user. Thus one has 1) a bunch of possible error conditions, 2) specific error handlers for signalled error conditions and 3) a bunch of restarts which can be called by the user. This typically also uses the feature that the error handling system doesn't about a routine in case of an error, but can call the error handling in the context of the error (-> the stack is not unwound). Thus all this machinery is now part of the programming language itself and not of a particular implementation.

There are not many software systems providing it in this way. For example the McCLIM Lisp Listener does. As does the SLIME IDE for Common Lisp / GNU Emacs. The most advanced was the error handling on the Symbolics Genera OS, where it provides hundreds of error conditions, many handlers and user interfaces for it. The commercial Lisps also have some UI support for it.

My personal opinion: a really good Lisp IDE / Environment should also make an extensive use of the condition system.
Duck Duck Go, and now sometimes Kagi
Did you see this? https://www.vice.com/en/article/dy7axa/how-i-broke-into-a-ba...
I think the criticism here is that Iberian history is not uniquely better rather than claiming it's uniquely worse.

(I'm British, so I'm not going to claim less-awful-than-thou against any nation).
Blogger from Google.
Your idea is unfortunately less likely to move as much money for someone to create a startup and profit as much from it.
In America, no. College-educated women are NOT interested in men without college degrees, no matter how much money they make. There might be rare exceptions for men that managed to become educated on their own after dropping out, like Steve Jobs.

It's not about the money, it's about the class, and also the pedigree. Blue-collar people are simply in a very different class than white-collar college-educated people. Their life experiences are completely different, and in the last few decades, with political polarization, their political views are 180 degrees different too.
It uses your location to look up information about your surroundings, which it then uses in its snaps. The users I spoke about it have a real uncanny valley feeling about it all. That may be real problem.
Don't know about .com, but the .org one linked here: https://www.sapiens.org/about-sapiens/

> SAPIENS is a publication of the Wenner-Gren Foundation and published in partnership with the University of Chicago Press, while maintaining unconditional editorial independence.

Their advisory board is all university people from across the world; from a distance it seems pretty legit to me.
Would a self-hosted static website be an alternative?

You could use your HTML skills, rent a cheap virtual server with nginx, and buy a web domain. Advantage: You are not dependent on the existence of a free platform provider, so your blog will still exist in 10 years.
While this is certainly true to an extent (and I wouldn't say it's "money" that's important, but rather "financial stability"), the issue researchers have seen is that high-earning women in America simply will not "date down". These women have more than enough money for 2 people, but even so will not date men who earn less than themselves. The opposite is not the case: men earning the same don't have this same requirement of dating partners, and in fact usually date women who earn less, many times much less.
A Google search of 'bedbug' and any major city in Europe will return plenty of hits.
20 years ago, I added a simple licensing feature to our business software - a readable XML with all the license features and timeframes for them and a signature. The license was pretty cool as it allowed us to do timed feature sets. Of course, our public key was obfuscated in the code, but it wasn't too hard to replace it. The reason was to keep the honest customers from easy abuse. The readability of the license key was a great plus. This worked very well for us, and we've managed to score some huge customers.
Workplace conditions at Amazon (both tech and non-tech) are quite awful. There are countless reports of workplace bullying, harassment, and retaliation[1][2][3][4]. Regarding PIP/Focus, managers will make things up and falsely report status to HR. It's an incredibly toxic experience. Amazon also uses its tremendous power to do things like execute unlawful surveillance on current and former employees, and falsely accuse them of crimes[5]. Can you imagine trying to raise kids while Amazon is trying to take everything you own, without legal cause? Unreal this is allowed to happen.

Regarding "death," warehouse workers are seriously injured twice as much as workers in other warehouses[6]. Amazon received numerous citations from OSHA last year for reasons including underreporting and mis-classifying incidents involving serious injuries and illness, as well as withholding information to OSHA. It's gotten bad enough even shareholders are pushing for change[7].

[1]https://www.seattletimes.com/business/amazon/they-think-they...
[2]https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-nlrb-idINKBN28...
[3]https://www.theverge.com/2021/7/23/22590134/amazon-harassmen...
[4]https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidjeans/2021/05/19/amazon-fi...
[5]https://www.seattletimes.com/business/after-3-years-seattles...
[6]https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/amazon-warehouse-worke...
[7]https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/a-shareholder-revolt...
It is not clear to me if this will be by default and applied to everyone in the next update, or if I have to setup something.
I just don’t want to have another thing to charge every day or two. Until Apple makes an eink watch or can somehow stretch the battery life to a week without compromising features I’m not interested.

I have an amazfit bip with an e-ink screen that I last charged 27 days ago, still have 16% battery life, and it serves its main purpose of showing me notifications for my apps (mind you not all of them) and tracking my sleep and steps.