skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
True, legal court cases can happen, but I can only address what the situation on the ground is right now. Also, the DOJ announced that rule is no longer-binding as of last year.

If you were, however, to penalize Apple; you would need to come up with a legal differentiation between a smartphone and a game console, as well as why the game console business model is moral and legal, but the locked-in smartphone market should be immoral and illegal. Considering there's no such thing as a "general purpose computing device" in the law; you would also need to come up with a pretty good explanation why Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft get to keep their exclusivity privileges but Apple loses theirs.

And that's a tricky nut to solve. Because you might say, "well, a smartphone can do way more than a game console." Well, that's only because the game console is so locked down - but a game console remains theoretically capable of anything a PC could do otherwise. If it wasn't for a lockout, you could install Windows on it and use it as a node in a supercomputer. Does that mean Apple would be legally fine if the smartphone was more locked down then? It's tricky.
You just generate a new key and link to it with your old key.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27état

Let's call it instigation.
There is no such things about forcing policies for conferences in the current trademark policy. (You're getting confused with a proposal that is being re-worked)

And even if there was it's hardly a deal breaker to use the language.
50 here too. TOTK is the first game I've preordered in at least a decade, which is surprising since BOTW was the first/only Zelda game I ever played. Big open-world games that I can sink my teeth into for a month or two seems to be my favorite genre nowadays.
We all know what happened to the train at the end of that movie.
After surrendering to the United States, Japanese companies were taught Harvard Business School ideas as part of a reconstruction effort.

While that is a very tiny piece of what is referred to as Japan's Economic Miracle, it is enough to explain the difference in exposure and susceptibility to Harvard Business School ideas compared to Korea, China, and Taiwan.
What about the colloquial increased education = increased stress. I’m not talking about the stress of trying to pay your bills on a welders salary, but the stress of running enterprise projects, teams, or being the top neuroscientist in your field. The stress from that is a different kind. It’s a continual stress especially for those that suffer from impostor syndrome. Anyway, interesting theory about cortisol spikes. Where can I read more?
Transistor Made of Wood
That seems incredibly short-sighted given the price in (ironically) lost productivity.

Is there some new school of philosophy among the management class that doesn't believe in spending money to make money? How exactly do we create value without investment? I think there's an enormous opportunity out there for a company that actually treats their employees with respect and pays attention to their needs. That includes saying "we are big enough".
I have a similar history.

The biggest loss for me on v7 -> v8 is 1Password Mini - that's a wonderful little 'browser extension for the desktop', and quick access is just awful to use in comparison.

It's not helped by their responses basically always being "but we like this, so it's better!" - they don't listen to customer feedback any more, and they pair it with their 'quirky' comms style that just comes off as condescending & dismissive. Collecting telemetry doesn't help if they ignore the feedback they already have.

edit: plus, they keep showing hard/impossible to dismiss UI in web pages to try to capture/fill fields, and it makes using the web pages really difficult!
Relevant market is not a vague rhetorical definition as you such described. US FTC has not attempted to define a relevant market for digital apps, but EU clearly considers iOS alone as a relevant market and thus regulates it with DMA.

To give you an idea of hypothetical regulation scenario: You want to move to an Android app. Sure you gotta need to change your phone as well. This is likely much more expensive than the app itself, thus it may make Android/iOS apps non-interchangeable. If FTC finds that this is expensive enough so most people won't make such move even if Apple decides to considerably increase the app store tax, then the App Store itself is a relevant market thus monopoly.

We don't know the legal conclusion since FTC hasn't done such study (this is a very complex process that takes several years with huge uncertainties, this is why politicians prefer direct regulation via legislation), but many experts believe that Apple is not in a very safe position.
You won't get a different answer from me at least. KYC/AML is just the financial version of global surveillance and should be fought just as vigorously.

Maybe HN just hates cryptocurrencies.
> He didn't found Tesla, but bought it.

I guess you can make that argument if you tilt your head and squint a certain way.

But he did become involved in Tesla when the company had only 3 employees, and contributed >85% of the series A funding (and also led the B and C rounds). He's been there for 19 of the company's 19.5 years of existence... hardly a new kid on the block.
This is what Epic tried to define the market as, but the court instead went with "mobile gaming transactions".
So if I buy a phone in Europe and get it all set up then Apple will remove functionality when I return to the States?
Hmm no, I use this from time to time, and it really is just a way to copy the codes to another device. It won't delete them from the original device. It notifies the device owner after a few minutes that the TOTP have been exported, and it keeps a log of exports.

I'm in the process of moving to Aegis. It's FOSS, encrypts the file on the device, and supports the biometric lock. It can do a daily backup to a few sources, including the Google backup (I think) and personally I dump it to a folder that my Nexcloud will automatically upload to my personal server.
I wonder if when you take affects like this into account if it really is safer to have large machines go "beep beep beep" in a warning that can be heard a kilometer away.
Even with 'just' a custom domain tied to a 3rd party email provider, with all the usual security stuff (DKIM, etc.) configured, my emails and emails addressed to me sometimes are marked as spam or disappear.
Something which is hated by the not-decision-makers but costs 25-40% as much of a big number will be overwhelmingly chosen by the are-decision-makers.
This is interesting. They use spaced out towing aircraft to avoid having to carry enough energy on a plane to make the whole flight.

It's very difficult for me to imagine this will ever become real - it's way too awkward, and now instead of just hoping you flight isn't delayed or cancelled, you also have to hope that holds for two towing flights as well.

But it's cool to see (presumed) funding for different ideas like this.
You can side load in other app stores in Android. iOS started out with side-loading, but then this was crushed by Apple's exercise of their absolute control of the operating system.
> You can spot it by the very verbose answers that don't say anything meaningful.

Although, in all fairness, I have been known to write verbose answers that don't say anything meaningful, too, and I'm not a bot. I think.
> user data is traded like financial assets and the burgeoning trend is to recognize it as user property

This is a tortured method. We generally treat things as property when we want to facilitate its ability to be traded and leveraged. What is the advantage of the property route versus enumerated rights?
The entire point of the court ruling is that it is not legally considered a monopoly, at least according to US antitrust law.
> Persepolis Fortification Tablets, dated back to 492–457 BC in the reign of Darius the Great, are characteristic examples of the Achaemenid records, most of which have not been translated (Root, 1997). Of the ~30,000 clay tablets (10,000 intact pieces, 10,000 more or less complete ones, and probably more than 10,000 fragments), 2100 texts were transcribed, interpreted, and published (Jones and Stolper, 2008)

This is a great example of something I wish more people knew— there exist so many historical texts that are untranslated. I work on Latin and Greek texts—I just can’t believe the stuff that has never been translated.
Bitflip is when a high energy particle changes the state of a memory address or signal in a wire.

Hot pixels are when the CCD (camera sensor) achieves its max level and becomes bright. Pixel overloaded (should also result in spillover).

Difference is really just what part of the system receives the energy. For example, you can overload a pixel with a laser, but you also should get spillover. Bit flips tend to be more localized, affecting only one part. In reality, the difference doesn't matter too much, as long as we're keeping our discussion to cosmic events. But also note that images experience a lot of (non-gaussian) noise and plenty of this is from cosmic excitation as well as from other natural and man made sources. Just the levels are a lot lower and unlikely to result in a bitflip (which is a pretty high energy event).
I'd like to see them try rehashing In the Navy by the Village People into pro war propaganda.
Most competent businesspeople can manage to expand their offerings into other markets without alienating the existing ones. Emphasis on "competent."
To be honest i wouldnt trust google with any accounts anymore. If you somehow get your account locked or banned, for whatever reason, youre screwed forever.
Right. If every plaintiff could just define a market a certain way, they would never lose a single anti-trust case. It isn't sustainable that way.

Most people who dislike Apple have already found themselves a nice Android phone on it for less money with several app stores.
The only instances where "digital addiction" is treated serious are authoritarian countries like China. In non-politically motivated indices it does not exist. Because it does not exist. No more than printed newspapers ruined people in the 1800s, electricity in the 1900s, radio in the 1920s or TV in the 1950s. This is basically just repurposing of future shock scares by scammers running "treatment" programs in the west and governments using it for social control elsewhere.
Nitpick: EPD is responsible for the cookie consents everywhere, not GDPR - https://gdpr.eu/cookies/

GDPR primarily concerns the user with information and takedown requests, the latter which could be considered deletion.
Measurement of conversions (ie. did somebody make a purchase after clicking the ad) is even more economically significant than targeting, and this is where ad publishers are most afraid of losing revenue due to privacy rules. The popular commentary on this subject is pretty detached from the business. The grandparent commenter’s “ban ad targeting” proposal manages to be both too extreme while also having little effect on data collection.
A filing date of 12/27/23 makes me think they’re either a little surprised at the popularity or not super-strong at biz-ops.
As someone who lives in the woods of the Ozarks: Every couple of days is not enough. If you're outside from April to November, you check.
I am not the developer. I just found it via Google and it helped me with my searches.
The comparison to the ADA is a good one, but it also illustrates the issue of how verifiable the remedies are. It's much easier to prove whether a business has a ramp than that they deleted some piece of data from all of their servers everywhere
amen, sibling
Yes! I’ve used atomics for metric counters (MPMC) with reasonable success. But for anything larger than an atomic uint64, you’d need good library support. Fortunately this can be solved without OS support in an optimistic fashion (atomic retry loop), right?
As I understand it, the raison d'être of nostr is to use relays to store your data, which is presented on clients. So if a front-end bans you, then you can grab your data off any relay. If imgur shuts down, you're out of luck!

Bluesky goes further with the AT protocol for more general data and algorithms iirc
California can't end copyright. Ending copyright as you have suggested elsewhere would take the US dropping out of several important world trade treaties and make it undesirable for any company, publisher, author, or artist that does want copyright to be here.

That aside, the current copyright approach does not prohibit P2P publishing (publish with a CC0 license and you're about as disclaimed of copyright as you can be).

This would do nothing to change advertising.
I'm curious about this, in the plugins section:

Do:

BarkBytes plugin for ChatGPT

BarkBytes ChatGPT plugin

Don’t:

BarkBytes plugin for OpenAI

BarkBytes plugin compatible with ChatGPT

BarkBytes plugin works with ChatGPT

BarkBytes plugin integrated with ChatGPT

A plugin is basically just an API that the provider allows ChatGPT to access, and a specification of that API. There's no reason you couldn't allow other non-OpenAI models to use your plugin too. Is OpenAI saying plugin providers -must- refer to their plugin as ChatGPT-exclusive, even if it's not?
It's a trademark application, not a copyright application. Quite different. You see copyrighted material is that which a GPT has been trained on, without any regards to those rights or protections. While a GPT trademark, on the other hand, is an underhanded attempt to leverage that same disregarded legal protection to secure an exclusive brand for itself, in spite of existing uses of the generic acronym.
I dunno, I think the old SUN logo is one of the finest logos that ever was.
that was a long time ago, no? They have also applied for GPT-3, GPT-4, but not GPT-5

I don't see the point though, it's not like some amazing name
While we’re complaining about Google’s 2FA offering…

The issue described here started happening to me recently: https://www.googlenestcommunity.com/t5/Apps-Account/Why-is-G...

Summary- Google has added a “match the numbers in the app” style 2FA to YouTube. Makes sense- their video monopoly means that for many iOS users like myself it’s the only Google app they’ve got. Except…

1) It’s the default, and there’s no apparent way to change it, or even turn it off. This is annoying- I prefer TOTP since it’s more secure. There’s a Google Prompts section in the 2FA settings, but it says that I don’t have any supported devices. This actually makes sense, because

2) It doesn’t f*king work! Ever since they changed it from “press yes” to “match number”, the screen opens in the YouTube app and then loads forever. Which means I’ve got a spurious notification on my phone, a screen to dismiss next time I open the YouTube app (or several, because for some reason they can stack), and two extra clicks every time I log into Google on a new device.

Actually, I lied earlier- there is one way to disable it, and it’s to DISABLE ALL 2FA, as you can see people doing in that support thread. I honestly don’t blame them, but clearly less 2FA was not the plan of whoever’s idea this was. Speaking of support forums- I don’t think anyone at Google reads them, but they do read HN :))))
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35692399
> JSON-LD

https://json-ld.org/ for anybody else not super familiar
Well, pi is approximately 3 to a certain degree of precision. To make a bad analogy, the BBC is currently saying that pi is 4 and increasing.
I completely agree with your perspective. The onus of using AI-generated responses responsibly does lie with the users. AI tools, like any other technology, can be used for both productive and unproductive purposes. The key is to strike a balance and use AI-generated responses in ways that contribute positively to online conversations.

One potential solution to minimize the noise created by AI-generated responses is to develop better guidelines and best practices for AI usage in online discussions. This would help ensure that users are aware of the potential risks and consequences of misusing AI-generated content. Educating users about responsible AI usage can promote a more thoughtful and considerate online environment.

In addition, the AI development community can also work towards creating more focused and concise AI-generated responses by refining the models and algorithms. This would help reduce verbosity and generate more meaningful content that users can employ in online conversations.

Ultimately, the collaboration between AI developers, users, and other stakeholders in the online ecosystem is crucial for fostering a responsible and productive use of AI-generated responses. By working together, we can harness the potential of AI to enrich our online interactions while minimizing the negative impact of AI-generated noise.
Is the luminosity variation due to changes in the size and temperature of Betelgeuse or because of clouds of cooling ejected matter obscuring our sightlines?
They're already working on a WebGPU adapter :)
Im sorry then, i misinterpreted. I guess i should delete this rant, but then mistakes are what makes us human and maybe i accidentally displayed just another sort of hubris :D

Have a pleasant day
The humanity of the individuals at the ends is not relevant. The point is that each individual only has to trust the other individual. Not, say a TLS certificate authority.
Would ya’ll stop giving them ideas?! You know their lawyers read HN!!
I mostly shoot ProRAW with Halide on my 14 Pro and the processing is reduced, but it's still there, and it's still obvious. I seldom get a photo I would actually consider printable at reasonable sizes because zooming in closely reveals obvious processing artifacts. The darker and higher contrast the scene, the worse it gets - the cool shots I've taken of SF's skyline at night are good test cases. They look good on the device display, but zooming in the processing is beyond obvious.

I was really excited for the 48MP sensor in my new iPhone. Initially I shot a lot more photos and tried to use it more like a 'real camera,' but I wound up picking up 35mm photography this year. I'll likely get a digital body eventually too, but I'm enjoying learning about film stocks and getting a really deep understanding of the exposure triangle. My fancy new iPhone camera ultimately just pushed me to realize I want to be shooting stuff that can enlarge and print better and it's still not there. Not to mention the optical effects of a "real lens" (bokeh, true and configurable physical depth of field).
> Watch browser integrations get progressively worse (check out the reviews on the Firefox extension, oh boy)

This doesn't align with my experience, and I've been using their app/service for years (the Windows & Mac apps, along with the Chrome and Firefox extensions). I don't mean to sound harsh but I'm scrolling through the negative reviews on the Firefox extension page as you suggested, and it's hard to take the majority of them seriously:

"i have never been happy with 1Password. Too frustrating to use."

"TOO DIFFICULT TO SIGN ON."
McDonald's is the app, and a McChicken sandwich a feature of the McDonald's app.

Phone operating systems are the malls, and for the vast bulk of us, unfortunately the only areas in the city zoned to have commercial app buildings.
Sony invented the term GPU. The G stood for geometry then, but “graphics” is just a backsolve.

NVDA is might have a claim on “graphics processing unit” but that’s a way less valuable mark than “GPU”

https://www.computer.org/publications/tech-news/chasing-pixe...
"Behind in implementations"—of non-standard "standards" Google loads into Chrome and then pushes devs to include in their web apps, just like Microsoft did with ActiveX back in the day, and for exactly the same reason: so that not only does their stuff only work on Chrome, but people like you see it not working on Safari and think the reason for that is that Apple is somehow working against them for nefarious purposes.
Yes, this paper [1] introduced the term.

https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&h...
I hope someone trademarks “Transformer”. It’s the stupidest name ever. The entire purpose of all code is to transform data. See 15 years of data oriented design discussion.

If I ever invent a specific ML design I’m going to call it “computer”. Because that’s as terrible of a name as “transformer”.
They are?

https://www.google.com/search?q=webgpu+unreal+engine

The top result there is a third party trying to achieve this. Not Epic themselves.
>They have a duopoly in the mobile market, and they each have a monopoly on their platform. The deli comparison is asinine since there are millions of delis vs 2.

No, Apple is literally hard coded to be the only app store on iOS. You can not install apps not from the app store, and you cannot install other app stores. Installing your app every week by paying $99/year to be a developer is not a viable alternative.

On Android you could install another app store within the next 2 minutes if you so desired.

This is the perfect definition of a misleading argument.
In Inferno (and Plan 9) it appears that network devices are filesystems -- e.g. there's a /net/ether0 directory which contains files with access semantics corresponding to various configuration and throughput tasks. I've read that it's even possible to 'mount' a remote network device on top of a local one, effectively tunneling traffic through the remote system. It's an interesting concept but I'm not sure of its utility, having never really used it.
> And now imagine someone has to write Windows drivers for all that buggy crap.

I don't know how modders manage to get Windows 10 working on Android phones without any source code yet they still somehow manage to get it running with various degrees of success:

https://www.xda-developers.com/renegade-project-boot-arm64-w...

And yet, I don't disagree with your rant. The entire "embedded" world is a bit of a mess when it comes to hardware and software. Apple can only do what they do because they manage most of it themselves. Now Microsoft can, and has, also done that to various degrees of success but they're still both hamstrung by their own strategic decisions and by the problems you've described because they're still outsourcing much more than Apple is.
I agree. The main uses of Tailwind are people making template-based pages, or putting up informational offerings in front of service-oriented businesses which give people APIs to build their own apps on.
Would make an interesting increase in RNG entropy ;)
https://www.thewhitereview.org/feature/chains-or-whips/

An interesting long read about 2000s pop culture, and how modern day female stars like Taylor Swift/Beyonce have been able to avoid the tabloid sensationalism/vilification that older stars like Britney Spears/Janet Jackson endured.
Interestingly, the record for OpenAI's application (for "GPT") has a note under "Goods and Services" that reads: "FIRST USE: 20181000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20181000" [1]

The paper "Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training" appears to have been released on June 11, 2018. [2]

1: It looks like I can't link directly to it, but it should be pretty easy to find by searching for "GPT" at the parent's link

2: https://openai.com/research/language-unsupervised
Lol explain Fox news.
A requirement to work 4 years being paid very little before you can get license and be paid for the work strongly reminds me servitude. If it was only about knowledge it should have been possible to demonstrate it by passing a hard exam, but one not allowed to take an exam until servitude if paid off.