skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's my problem with it as well... I keep on clicking "I'm not interested" for all kind of clickbait brainless content, but they keep on coming back.
9 hours and no solution. And this is second time I post this.

Goes to show how surprising YAML is, which is it's worst property.
(not being sarcastic, just naive)

what is an example of an actually revolutionary coin?
Yes, that's a funny part too, they're hilarious those two.
> LSD is a hallucinogenic drug, promoted a lot in tech circles for both recreation and the expanse of creativity it grants you.

Those last six words are troubling.

At least in my experience, it's that drugs tend follow the creatives around. Often to the detriment of their creativity.

I sincerely hope this kind of cargo-culting of LSD is limited to college-age tech circles.
Ubuntu 18.04 will reach EOL in May.
> Anyway.. when I recommend LSD to new friends, it's to stay in the fun domain (50-150micrograms, go have fun at a music festival) and consider the myriad of other forms of therapy first.

This is what I do as well. People are gonna take drugs, I’m not trying to talk anyone out of that, so I recommend staying safe and sticking with low doses. But curiosity often comes calling anyway and people naturally want to delve deeper, and I worry a lot of people justify massive doses without proper preparation because they see so many people saying “oh, there’s no such thing as a bad trip!”.
The major ML conferences all have pretty tight page limits, so more expository sentences usually get cut. This also means that papers usually only explain how their work is different from previous work, so they assume you are familiar with the papers they cite or are willing to read the cited papers.

This means that people who have an up-to-date knowledge of a given subfield can quickly get a lot out of a new papers. Unfortunately, it also means that it usually takes a pretty decent stack of papers to get up to speed on a new subfield since you have to read the important segments of the commonly cited papers in order to gain the common knowledge that papers are being diffed against.

Traditionally, this issue is solved by textbooks, since the base set of ideas in a given field or subfield is pretty stable. ML has been moving pretty fast in recent years, so there is still a sizable gap between the base knowledge required for productive paper reading and what you can get out of a textbook. For example, Goodfellow et al [1] is a great intro to the core ideas of deep learning, but it was published before transformers were invented, so it doesn’t mention them at all.

[1] https://www.deeplearningbook.org/
This happened to a teenager I know. About 6 months ago. They’ve been hospitalized several times for suicidal thoughts, self harm, etc. Really messing them up, I fear for the rest of their life.
Bed Bath and Beyond Inc. Files Voluntary Chapter 11 Petitions
> The Super Pressure Balloon-Borne Imaging Telescope (SuperBIT) was flown to the edge of space

> SuperBIT flies at an altitude of 33.5 kilometres

Just no. I could understand say, shaving a few km off to get the project into "space". Maybe ten. I get that space is a bit of a blurry boundary and somewhat arbitrary up there.

But not seventy.
> we don't need to structure society for the benefit of the stereotypical clueless pointy-haired mba

Seems to me like building codes and other such regulation is for the for the benefit of the people living in those homes, precisely so that they don't get built by stereotypical clueless pointy-haired MBAs.
I’m not really talking about the definition of martyrdom, I’m talking about the effects of martyrdom on the general public.

E.g., what would Christianity become had Jesus not died on the cross? The central motivation of the Christian faith is that Christ died for our sins. It wouldn’t be so impactful if Jesus died of old age like everyone else.

I’m basically saying that being a martyr is something that amplifies a person’s image, and that’s the reason why Aaron came up in the first place.

If he took the six month plea deal and was alive today, he would not be part of this discussion.
Even that first link explicitly calls out MVCC table bloat with that strategy? Like, you can do it right (and I have no comment on your implementation in particular, let's assume for the sake of argument it's fantastic), but it's easy to write a right-looking solution with the property that innocuous-looking one-line changes cause major issues. I wouldn't want an average development team to pursue that approach without good reason, especially when the alternatives are so easy to do right.
Ahem. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1649900776821518338
Share the link if you do. Would like to read through your thoughts.
I definitely would not be taking the other side of that bet, you can simply compare the per kg price of the branded sets vs the ones that are 'just' Lego.
And yet misconfigurations still mean people don't get paged.

A simple solution is to make triggering a "fire drill" a standard part of your on-call rotation hand-off.
I remember last year when I got my first Mac in over a decade being excited to see the app store. Every now and then I saw Mac exclusive apps being posted on here that looked incredible, just so well designed with a lot of focus. I also heard about the rigorous review process so assumed that it'd all be like that.

When I got it and tried looking for a music player (I'm not a big fan of Apples own music player + it doesn't support FLAC) I was stunned by just how much junk there was on there. The bloody Google Play store looked better, and this was repeated for pretty much every common purpose app I looked for. Of course there were good ones (I never managed to find a good music player, or audiobook player, though), but thats a pretty low bar.

Coming from Fedora and seeing the quality apps being put out on Flatpak and the like (Amberol and Cozy for example), as well as quite a few other things about MacOS in general, I felt like Gnome was more like (what I expected from) MacOS than MacOS itself. Over time, as I got used to the differences in the OS, a lot of that faded, but my feelings about the two app markets remains the same.
No mention of the fact the crossing over happens at different levels if at all in the body.

Look up Brown-Séquard syndrome for a House MD level quirk of the body.
> It looks to me that the author might have other health complications that caused the bad trips.

This doesn't matter and is a very misleading IMHO.

Because people having some per-existing conditions they don't know about and hasn't caused anything but supper middle issues is _extremely high_. EDIT (extremely likely to have some condition, not neccessary a condition which interacts with the drug you are about to take)

And the problem with psychedelics is that the chance of both you getting long term problems if you have conditions from even small doses and you not knowing about this conditions and you and people around you not understanding the risk at all is high (at least if compared to some of the legal drugs, like alcohol).

Through I believe they do have high potential in health care (assuming personal being well educated about this topic()), because one one hand this setting allows reducing the number of unknown risk factors, (should be) well educated, and directly know what to do if something goes wrong.

() Except that the handling of pain killers in the US can make you question if that is reliable possible.
I think I understand it pretty well.

Edit: I had to retract what I said here because a lot of things the reddit founders said from 2006-2009 seem to be missing and I couldn't find anything to back it up https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20339
It’s the same mechanism that triggers the game mode in Windows. You can tag a program in the Xbox game bar as a game if it hasn’t recognized it by default.
> if you go read the second to last summary, it states what I was meaning to say. I think I read it a bit quickly - it states that Mann met the burden of proving that a jury could find actual malice…etc. The to me is enough to indicate that the courts were supporting the suits as having some degree of validity. I think I was a little heavy worded in my prior comment.

Assuming you mean the third to last document in the reverse chronological listing (the second to last is the plaintiff’s amended complaint, not a finding of the court), this is a ruling on a very early motion to dismiss, and what it actually found is that it was too early to determine whether or not there was, as a matter of law, sufficient evidence for a jury to find “actual malice” to the required standard of proof. [0] The first (most recent) document in that list (the one I linked upthread) is on a later motion for summary judgement, and, on the same issue, the court found explicitly against Mann on “actual malice” from CEI, finding that there was not evidence on which a reasonable jury could find that, which is why they dismissed his claim against CEI. That earlier ruling is not the court endorsing any degree of validity of any of Mann's claims, it is simply stating it is too early to address whether or not those claims were material disputes of fact for the jury, much less whether they had validity (which is mostly what the jury decides, though the court can resolve it when it reaches the level where there is no basis for a jury to find one way or the other.)

> What I meant to say was that all courts recognized some degree of validity to his claims of derogatory comments,

That’s simply false; some found that there would be triable issue of fact on falsity, but that’s not recognizing any merit of the claim, and others simply did not address the question at all.

> What I meant to say was that all courts recognized some degree of validity to his claims of derogatory comments, by not dismissing his suits on those grounds, but on technicalities.

Dismissing claims because of failure to provide sufficient evidence to meet required elements of the claim (like “actual malice” against CEI) is not a “technicality” (which is a bad name for procedural misconduct resulting in a dismissal with prejudice, anyway) but a ruling on the merits of the claim.

> So the whole thing is simply inconclusive, while the other commenter keeps arguing that it proves Mann is the antichrist.

I don’t see anyone claiming that Mann is the antichrist. He is a serial abuser of the legal systems of multiple jurisdictions, however, that is clear, and his claims on this issue have either been dismissed on the merits or because of his culpable failure to pursue them.

[0] “At this stage, the evidence before the Court does not amount to a showing of clear and convincing as to ‘actual malice,’ however there is sufficient evidence to find that further discovery may uncover evidence of ‘actual malice.’ It is therefore premature to make a determination as to whether the CEI Defendants did not act with ‘actual malice.’” http://climatecasechart.com/case/mann-v-competitive-enterpri...
I would love to hear more about your experience and how it measurably improved your life. My point though is not that it is impossible for people to see real benefits. My point is that the vast majority of people that have tried it don’t seem any better off than before.
Most people from the Lego scene were out of it for a decade or more and then sort of rediscovered it, usually in tandem with their own kids.
4.5 some of the less arrogant academics internalize the complaints about their solutions and iterate on it to make it 20% easier to use and/or 20% better in practice, making the cost of change more attractive.
Just a small reminder that the CCD with V-Cache has way lower boost clocks and therefore performs worse in almost everything beside gaming. For casual use this is irrelevant I think, but it is still significant in many workloads. The only workload I know where V-Cache benefits more than it is hurt by lower boost clocks is gaming.

The advantage of the dual CCD design is that this only/mostly hurts in highly threaded workloads at least.
> Sadly you can't have 2 million apps and maintain a high standard. The costs to review each of those apps thoroughly would be astronomical.

Well, that's part of the problem. Should we really have 2 million apps in the store, when 70% of them are knockoffs, scams or absolute garbage? That's currently one app for every 850 iOS users, it's a ridiculous number.

The estimate for Apple's cut for app sales & subscriptions last year was 85 billion dollars. Surely that can fund a decent reviewing process... but they also benefit from all this 'activity'.
> And no, money laundering isn't a valid use case.

Working-class folks sending money to their families abroad without predatory middlemen like Western Union, on the other hand, is a valid use case. So is making/accepting payments without being subject to credit card processors playing morality police (or payment handlers like Paypal outright confiscating money from individuals/businesses they don't like).
They recently cut it to 15%, and to keep the lights on, cut their review staff by 100%.
And now they're moving to Boston. CT loses another multinational company, they just can't catch a break. Then again it is entirely the state's own fault for driving businesses away.
If the law forbids something, that’s a very different situation than a TOS or EULA forbidding something.
You can pay for YT premium from Google play dollars which have gift cards. It's a little bit annoying to set up though.
Big fan and long-time user of rcmd, Hyperkey, Rectangle, BTT - all lovingly-crafted by independent developers. All solo, I believe.

I know Raycast is getting a lot of attention right now but isn’t this a VC-backed SaaS? How do people feel about inviting them on to their desktop - aren’t you worried about the inevitable other shoe dropping?
> bug fix updates getting rejected for stupid, unrelated, nitpicky reasons, things that had already been in the app for months or years

This reminds me of code review in general. Some reviewers have the etiquette of "if it was there already, then it's outside the scope of this review," and some don't.

Maybe a reviewer should have two responsibilities:

1. Review the proposed _change_ and verify that it meets all criteria and doesn't introduce defects.

2. Make note of any existing defects, which are then recorded.

Maybe an app developer can be required to resolve everything found in (2) before the _next_ review.

I've never released an app before.
> Currently I feel that there’s nothing about life or myself that I can learn on drugs that I can’t learn in other (safer) ways.

Absolutely. I think the best way to look at the psychedelic experience is as something that shows you a different way of perceiving reality that you should then seek to translate into long term change via spiritual practice.

For those who gets the most out of it, I don't hear them talking about taking it continually, all the time. Usually it shows them something that leads them to other things.
Both Amazon and Walmart have pulled back on solar due to fires and electrical issues...

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/01/amazon-took-solar-rooftops-o...

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/05/tesla-and-walmart-settle-ove...

Might have been a Tesla issue in both cases.
You skipped the part where I explicitly concluded that the effect comes from the difference in temperatures. I don't ignore it, I first understand the zero order - at uniform temperatures, there is no effect of CO2. Which leads to an understanding that if CO2 does indeed make a difference, it is the result of the temperature differences.

Then the part where I'm not at all certain about which direction the effect should be, is because while CO2 decreases thermal conductivity by radiation, it increases thermal conductivity by convection because the heat capacity is higher for CO2. Which is actually a much better intuition if you want to understand how does water vapor seems to have such negligible effect despite the fact it is a "greenhouse gas" and "absorbs much more heat".

You want me to point out bugs? There are like 20 different climate models. I've seen heat capacity being constant independent of pressure, temperature, CO2, density, etc. Not just heat capacity, but also other "constants". Not in a single place because the code is a mess, they actually have several different modules with different constants, so say the radiation simulation is extremely detailed mess that's completely unreadable, and the cloud simulation just starts all over with their own different constants.

Writing such code is somewhat human task, but reasoning about the magnitude of the mess that is going on there and which directions the errors will go is beyond the capabilities of anyone. It could be possible but not with the way it's currently written.

I'm sorry, but it is your thermodynamic intuition that's completely wrong. Equilibrium to you means "things stop moving". That... not how thermodynamics works at all. The reason that ordinary things look like they are "not moving" in equilibrium in your everyday life is because they do move, but at scales much smaller than you. Do the Brownian motion experiment.

And meta-stable states have everything to do with this, again this is your lack of understanding of physics, not mine. Given a thermodynamic system, there's expansion around the meta stable state or the unstable state over time, where you get the duration to reach equilibrium from the size of the fluctuations. The gist of the expansion is that what delays reaching equilibrium is that the fluctuations are too small.

There's infinite reasons why warming might be happening. Just the direction itself is a single bit of information with no significance whatsoever. It isn't worth my time arguing against a theory whose statistical strength is one bit.

The models don't have any significance beyond this bit or maybe two bits if you try to be generous about their abysmal performance regarding temperatures. They had some success at very high attitudes, but that's not surprising as these high attitudes are just so much simpler to predict and have no bearing on the rest of the model and the actual climate as observed on the ground. They excuse their shortcoming as the "weather", but if your models don't have any feedback from reality and testing around the parts that matter, why should I trust them ?
There's not many regions in Russia that would really break away.

If we speak about regions with russian majority then it's unlikely because despite Russia being very big russian ethnicity culturally is quite uniform.
And as for other ethnicities then for most of them it's not economically or politically viable to separate: either their country will become enclaves surrounded by large mass of russian territory or will occupy territory with harsh environment where it would be hard even in the long run to establish sustainable modern economy without tight economical integration with russian territories.

So if we speak about regions with reasonable potential to break away then they are republics in Northern Caucasus and maybe Tyva.
And that not very much.
You need to resubmit a new version. It can be just a "bumped" build, if there's no app change, but the screenshots don't appear, until the new version has been approved and released.
I agree with your points! My point is that democracy by itself is not sufficient for what we'd now call a civilized society. It also takes certain values to be shared by most of the society. And these have changed significantly since the times of Pericles.
"Dried" hay still contains a significant amount of water.

> It is recommended to bale alfalfa when moisture is between 18 and 20%

https://ag.umass.edu/crops-dairy-livestock-equine/fact-sheet...
Yes same happened to me. After about 3 years I went back to a gas car. After the vanity / hobby enthusiasm diminishes, charging and the current limitations become just very frustrating to deal with every day. To be fair I made the frustrating experience mostly in non-Tesla cars. However, Tesla has other things that can be frustrating.
Thanks for the great writeup! The root loading makes perfect sense when you think about it and in that context makes the equation much more expensive unless the warehouse could feasibly use all the power generated (which seems unlikely).
It's interesting that they are selling the excess to the local supplier as they will be able to offset the cost faster, and start making a profit from it sooner. That is, the point at which the amount of money saved from not paying for the electricity and the amount gained from selling the excess balances the cost for the installation.
Unfortunately there is no further information about the exposure time of these images
To be honest I always wrote off Yabai until someone here commented that it works fine without disabling SIP. Only a small subset of features need that.
I guess so. I guess that’s partly why force quit exists. The OS does provide a way to do what I expect the OS to handle for me.
> Superforecasters do not predict the future with perfect accuracy: Bloomberg notes that they made a prediction of 23% for a leave vote in the month of the June 2016 Brexit referendum. On the other hand, the BBC notes that they accurately predicted Donald Trump's success in the 2016 Republican Party primaries.[11]

Is there any good documentation on superforecasters efficacy? Like with actual statistical measurements? Because the Wikipedia article is really dumb.
The night fuzz is probably the brain generating noise. I use it to fall asleep quicker. But the white squiggles on white or against the blue sky are white blood cells at the back of your eye.
Cool. I think what this shows (your experience at superchargers vs mine, and my experience at EA vs the article) is that personal experiences vary, and we need better stats.
Is the algorithm known to produce all theoretically possible hash values?

Imagine a simple algorithm that should hash a string to a number 0-3, but due to an extra condition it actually cannot produce "3", pseudocode:

```
Sum = sumOfAsciiCodeOfString(input);
Rest = Sum % 4;
Return Rest === 3 ? 2 : Rest;
```

Or due to a bug (replace `% 4` with `% 3`).

Can we prove that md5 doesn't suffer from such issues and it actually can output ffffffffffff or deaddeaddeaddead ?
It's like anything, it's not for everyone and you should make informed decisions before try something like LSD or anything else for that matter. But you shouldn't be making those types of life decisions based on a comment from someone like Steve Jobs. LSD is one of the most potent psychoactive compounds known. It's not a toy. You have to be smart about these things. Again it's not for everyone. Don't find out the hard way.
This might be the place to ask, since half an hour of searching the other day came up empty for Apple Silicon Macs: does anyone know how to diagnose hotkey conflicts? I use hyper (caps) + q, e to navigate between spaces but hyper + q recently stopped working, so … I can only go right.
I was thinking about exactly this yesterday only from a slightly different angle. Not just likes but the full suite of emoji reactions. Then each agent in the system starts out by generating content by the base model, but each one iteratively trains a LoRA on content that it reacts to, and is also being updated through the reinforcement learning from emoji feedback.

This is just going to get weirder and weirder.