skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So do you disagree with the part of the article that points a finger at traditional expectations and stereotypes, such as:

> “We used to think women were overutilizing health care, and men were doing it correctly,” Griffith said. “What we realized was that women were doing it better, mostly for preventive care, and men were actually underutilizing health care.”

> Cultural biases around masculinity that teach boys and men to hide their feelings and not complain also can influence men’s health.

> But even when visits for pregnancy are excluded, research suggests that women still are twice as likely as men to schedule regular annual exams and use preventive services.

I don't think we ever had healthy male role models that were concerned about going to the doctor regularly, say.

(The article also talks about some systemic issues in the last section, from two women at the Washington Post; as a result are these women being labeled as "oppressor class torch-carrying Capitol-storming MAGA cultist or to worshiping Andrew Tate" anywhere?)
Damn it! I was just about to get promoted to senior prompt engineer and now they just automate my job. I worked so hard on reschooling myself from metaverse pixel ape designer, and now I’ll have to learn something new. Any suggestions?
I don't really like the latter parts of the article where he begins suggesting that we need to contextually tag all data so the provenance of generated items can be assessed.

Somehow, I don't think forcing attribution and tracking on all the world's data is a good idea. Or, you know, possible.

Like, he outlines this nightmare scenario of terrorists using torture deepfakes to threaten people, then wants to pretend that terrorists will be so kind as to mark their videos as AI-produced?

Like the top comment said, the problem is corporations and capital. All the rest of this is more and more smoke to cover up the very real, human-powered destruction of the open web, free information, and privacy.
Why do they use kanji now?
Since you worked at Spumco, weren't the animators using a combo of hand-drawn work and PowerAnimator or did things move on quite quickly to digital art by the time you were there?

While Adobe is still making animate Teen Titans Go! (a Spongebob-esque spinoff of the original show), as well as many other US animated shows past 2012, moved on to Toon Boom.
> “Men are advantaged in every aspect of our society, yet we have worse health outcomes for most of the things that will kill you,”

Maybe it's not a good idea to predicate any mention of serious men's health issues with initial blanket dismissal / overt acceptance of discrimination and subsequently making it about how it's actually important for these other groups. Even if aspects of that are hypothetically arguable, let the point be made to be important on it's own.
You need to actively defend a trademark to keep it protected. Formally registering it is neither sufficient nor necessary.

Also as someone pointed out on Twitter it's probably not even in the right category to protect against the use in educational material. Also even if it were it's probably nominative fair use anyways.
It seems like Apple is trying to build a “healthy” social media platform (perhaps social experience is a better term). I could see them pulling this off pretty well, and would love if this took away oxygen from Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and the rest of the toxic systems out there.
No, under that logic we would take the time to consider them before just taking what we want. Most of these problems are not massive things and can be worked around without kicking people onto their asses. Most of the janitors can be covered just by each business taking the time to communicate with the building management, instead of saving $50 a week on cleaning with the 4 day week just save $40 and kick it to the janitor, most janitors clean a few dozen offices a night, each kick in $5-10 a week and it all adds up. But why when we can just say ME! and get brownie points caring about the plight of janitors come election season.
When I dual booted a hackintosh and windows (2015) I did so on 2 different drives so I wouldn’t have windows scribbling over my boot sector
on one hand that sucks for now competing developers of journaling apps. on the other any time a OS developer builds a new first party app they will be competing with other developers does that men they shouldn't make any other apps or improve the os in a way the another developer as app that fixes? no of course not. the question is how to balance it. My 'if i were god-emperor for a day' answer is to not give first party apps any access to restricted api or any preferential access to restricted permissions/data
Boot to Vim, Vim as Pid 1 (2014)
This is false. There's significant support across the political spectrum for curtailing Section 230, which is why EARN IT has bipartisan cosponsors.

Big tech companies, employees of said companies, and their lobbyists and marketing angles, of course, are loudly against it, which is why you will see less support for it here on HN.
Why so unambitious?

When I'm king, you will have to assume lack of consent without asking. If users want to be tracked they can opt-in by emailing trackme@<your domain>.
I still don’t get it.

If MRIs lead to unnecessary biopsies, then don’t do the biopsy. What exactly does the data show? If doing a test leads to an unnecessary biopsy, how can it be the test’s fault? Tests aren’t moral agents. The MRI machine can’t make any healthcare decisions for anyone.
> What world are you living in, where this isn’t happening?

You left off the rest of the sentence: “to massively boost their productivity or achieve otherwise impossible feats”
I guess that's one way of laying more people off without having to fire them.
Remember when it was a very big deal when a certain company pre installed a certain app in their OS?
More than 19k undersea volcanoes discovered
The problem with addressing men's mental health is that many who claim to advocate for it fail to realize that they perpetuate and reinforce the very culture that causes men's mental health issues.

They claim to care about the plight of men who are body shamed, but make small dick jokes, worship traditionally attractive male archetypes, and think it's funny when a pathetic, evil male character is either short, bald, or has a high-pitched voice.

They claim to care about men lagging in education, but pay much more attention to the academic/professional fields that are "boy's clubs" and never talk about "girl's clubs" in the same way, even though nowadays women outnumber male college graduates 3 to 2.

They claim to be all for sex positivity, but continually vilify male sexuality, to the point that men feel scared to express their desires and urges without being labeled a predator/sex pest/-cel adjacent.

The reason men's mental health is so messed up nowadays is that people on all sides of the spectrum seem to implicitly reinforce a traditionally masculine winner takes all culture, where the confident, attractive and aggressive men reap all the rewards. Any reasonable heterosexual male isn't gonna look at this reality of modern culture and think "well, at least I know how to share my emotions properly", when they see the positive romantic attention lauded much more often on those embodying the more stoic, traditional male stereotypes. They'd much rather do whatever it takes to fit into that stereotype so they don't miss out when they're still young. And further, if they feel that no amount of effort will get them there, and they express that concern, they are offered no sympathy.

I think this addresses a large part of the issue well:
https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/31/radicalizing-the-roman...
Imagine how profoundly ignorant a law enforcement official must be to swear an affidavit for a search warrant based on maxmind geolocation IP data. People who have seen too many episodes of Law & Order or something and take it as how to literally do their job. And then how profoundly ignorant about technology a judge must be to sign a warrant based on such flawed information.
Most humans can tell you pretty accurately whether or not a passage contains a word.
If you do #5 well then yeah, you can get away with it, because your database is just a repository pattern away.

I think people want to avoid this because its annoying or you have to think a decent bit up front or its just cheaper and easier to do this directly this one time, until its everywhere.
yes the easy setup with crdb is really attractive but then you realize that they hide a few very important features behind the paid option. No incremental backups and no partitions (I think of any kind...). Those are some big features to lose, obviously I'm not complaining, just comparing. That was the main reason why I started developing my project in MySQL because at least MySQL has a lot of different free providers. YugabyteDB exists for Postgres too but initially I was more impressed with Vitess and TiDB because TiDB is used by some really huge chinese companies and if they don't have a problem then it must be okay. Unfortunately TiDB essentially doesn't want you to run a single node, ever, and their smallest recommended deployment is 5 nodes. That's a lot.
Citus also exists for Postgres but their docs basically tell you that it's only recommended for analytics so I don't know what to think of it. And it sounds like all it's doing is a basic master-slave postgres setup with quite a few manual things you have to do to even benefit (manually altering tables to make them sharded/partitioned)
After trying a degoogled android device, I switched back to iOS. If you decide to keep things like location on device and disable ad telemetry on both platforms, you’ll find the third party iOS ecosystem is much stronger. (On Android, this leads to random apps closing at start with NullPointerException when they request unnecessary Google services.)

I’d prefer a FOSS phone ecosystem, but sometimes pragmatism wins out.
This.
In some place it’s the natural order to have forest fire from time to time.

If we prevent them long enough a huge one will happen at the worst time (dry, windy with lots of material to burn. At this point there very little you can do.

In the east cost there is rain regularly, so the usual thing is that wood, leaves rot instead, fires happen rarely.
> Copyright should protect expression and not restrict reusing ideas.

That's what patents are for.
Start here :)

After that, LinkedIn is always a good starting point. But it’s important to make sure you are writing an interesting role descriptions… no GPT plz.
Nice little game. If your inspiration is Japanese '80s arcade shooters, it's worth taking a close look at them (and their 90s and 2000s sequels) to understood how they held the player's attention. A mistake I see in this game and many other Western shmups is giving the enemies too much health. Slowly chipping away at bad guys gets boring, usually the rule in these games is that small enemies die in 1-2 hits and larger enemies live just long enough to test whether you can evade their pattern of fire. The challenge comes more from weathering swarms of enemies than from any individual foe. Displaying lifebars above non-boss enemies is a sign it takes too long to destroy them. The pacing of arcade games is also instructive; levels usually last just a couple minutes and the enemy patterns are constantly varying.

Other than that the music and aesthetics are great, though there is some funny aliasing of sprites and JPEG artifacts in the backgrounds. The key to this kind of aesthetic is a crisp look.
The absolute vast majority of the population don't care one bit about their privacy.

If they did, Google and Meta would be out of business. The only thing they really offer is for advertisers to target really, really specific groups of people thanks to the data they collect from those groups (EVERYONE, except a handful of HN readers and other dissidents) which everyone voluntarily hands over, because they simply don't care.

Of course, it's just a symptom of the problem.

Refuse to believe all you want, but have a deep think and consider whether the average person cares about his privacy. Even if they say they do.

Freedom doesn't sell anymore. Outsourcing virtually every single aspect of your life to a corporation that Just Knows Better(tm) does. Everything is a service. Most of the tech you own is a service, not a physical item.

And both things can't be true simultaneously, you can't crave freedom while outsourcing absolutely everything to someone else. Freedom requires you to take over the responsibility over your life, which far too many people simply aren't willing to do. Unfortunately, in my opinion, this is where the society has ended up in.
I realized this was the truth when I observed that while most feminists are "technically" against MGM (male circumcision at birth for non medically necessary reasons), very few are putting any serious energy into ending this barbaric practice. In fact, some complain that effort on ending this "trades off" with ending FGM, despite that FGM is quite rare in the USA and developed world while MGM is still happening to tens of millions of American babies

It's mainly groups who are loosely affiliated with "MRAs" who are putting meaningful effort into ending this. I'm not a huge fan of "MRAs" or traditional "red pill" ideology - but men who look down and see evidence of the evils of a sick society on their body cannot find a meaningful defense from the very people who claim to want to "rescue" men from "patriarchal power structures".
All this time I thought that gravity creates heavy, not light.
You can install Docker directly on Proxmox. I did a little comparison of the 3 methods [1].

[1] https://danthesalmon.com/running-docker-on-proxmox/
Here's the bill on govscent (with topics extracted by openai, UI is very much still early days...)

https://govscent.org/bill/USA/118s686is

We also have the topics and summaries by section, but I have yet to build the UI for it.
Surveillance by Tesla: Yeh vs. Telsa, Inc
> what qualifies a structural engineer? Licensing, a product of regulation.

No, licensing does not qualify a structural engineer. What qualifies a structural engineer is being willing to sign a legal document when, say, a bridge is completed, that says that they take legal responsibility for the bridge's safe functioning, and agree to be held legally liable if it fails. Licensing just means that, in addition to knowing enough about structural engineering to be willing to make such a legal commitment, they also have to get a piece of paper from the government before they can sign off legally as the structural engineer of record for a project.
Is this a Microsoft Internet Explorer reference?
The problem, at least in US general social discourse, it everything is viewed through an essentialist lens. It's an addictive resolution to the ambiguity of post-modern thought, because it reduces nuances to a cacophony of labels, creates clear villain/hero dichotomies, and allows everyone to architect their maximal perfect victimhood.
> land

“Dollar collapse” means a collapse of the US government.

In that case, holding land becomes very literal, you must physically occupy and defend it; your deed to some property may not be worth much.
The way I would do it (to be tweaked for each target LLM) is to give GPT4 a prompt telling it what kind of things make for a good prompt followed by a dozen of before/after examples (spanning various domains).
AI Plus Whatever
Why can't I have iOS but without all the loss of control and privacy. For $1k/device can't someone establish a healthy competitor to iPhones that isn't low quality like android? The crappy deal these days is you can't have a phone that only calls and texts period.

Forget UI and all that. 4G modem and an OS that displays UI for calling and texting with formally verified E2E encryption for both with no plans to offer any features outside of this period! I would buy that in a heartbeat.
It is highly likely that it's still possible today. All you need is a bunch of other wackos, like you say.

Alone? No chance whatsoever.

Bundy standoff worked, after all. Of course it has the prerequisite of being willing to die for the cause, which I doubt many people have, aside from the very select few for whom the most important mission in life is to live free.

Me? I thoroughly admire such "wackos", but I enjoy the finer things in life way too much for this to be a feasible option for me.
Once of the major lifts at my last job was going from Oracle to post Fred's. The speed procedures were the worst part of it all.
Just to add one more, this article from Erik Kennedy (the guy behind learnui.design) and the “copy work” technique noticeably helped advance my design skill. https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2017/02/improving-ui-design...

Someone else mentioned paying attention to the design elements all around - this exercise of copying designs by hand is an excellent way to start to notice those little details.
What you are describing is 100% malicious. These companies are intentionally ignoring their legal obligations for their own benefit and to their users' detriment.

Obviously people making the decision are going to try to come up with a justification to make themselves feel okay about doing it, though.
That's the Bahamas not Bermuda.
That doesn't ring true to me, looking at Amazon it doesn't look to me like their warehouse system engineers are paying the consequences of their system, while the OSHA is some corrupt/carefree player.

Also, looking from a step behing at our exchange, you are arguing that people need skin in the game to be fair and make weighted decisions, pointing at a writer who stopped having any skin in the game to write books and go on interviews and become an influencer.
What's up with that dramatically different shape of the "Ratio of male-to-female death rates across ages for the U.S., other countries" graph between say Chile/US and South Korea?
Corporate personhood means that you can own a piece of a company without being personally liable, because the corporation is its own legal entity. This is why people can start businesses without worrying about being in debt for the rest of their lives if it fails. After all, if the corporation isn't a separate legal entity but just a collection of investors, if the corporation wronged someone, the investors could be sued personally.

Maybe the concept is taken too far in terms of political donations and free speech but no corporate personhood would mean that very few people would stick out their necks to start or invest in companies. I don't think a modern economy would even be possible.
I would switch to an iPhone if I could get NewPipe, Firefox, and root-level ad blocking. Those are the killer features that make me keep my degoogled Android phone, despite the horrendous quality of most Android apps.
I suppose that's subjective, but for me he hits a notes that grate. If you explain it like you do, it's fine.

Ringtone: None. “I don’t use a ring of any kind on my phone. This is so that I am always on offense and never defense.”

https://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2013/03/dave-morin-path-f...
An Overview of the NetWare Operating System (1994) [pdf]
I’ve done it twice. Mass migration off Oracle and before that DB2 and Sybase. Current system is also occasionally sold on premise to customers who have their own db preference and we can support them all.
God were only like a few months in and im already so annoyed with people bringing up chat gpt. No this isnt a good question for chat gpt because chatgpt has no critical thinking skills, which is the foundation of a sound investment strategy.

Chat gpt is trained on the internet. The ratio of bad advice to good advice on the internet is about a million to one.
Sure, but a web-browser works well enough
High performance, low error-tolerance applications previously only available to Windows are a continuing lock-in, yes - that's part of why gpu drivers are such a big deal.

There have been working comparability layers for the various hard-to-run on anything but Windows software appliances, but a major sticking point has been the GPU support (which keeps the software running well).

I don't think this will be true forever though, graphics drivers continue to make strides in being more open, often to the benefit of the various organizations writing or purchasing the gpus/firmware/drivers.
But with that type of usage don’t you hit the message cap on gpt4?

Have you tried and compared phind.com?
What about Singapore?
> I've found ways to use it to improve my productivity in a bunch of areas

like what?
>I can protect you

<huh, from what?

>myself (:
There is zero evidence that crypto acts as a hedge against the dollar. It has basically mostly tracked the dollar denominated stock markets.
> there's a big difference between the policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and going full on into LGBTQPIA+ that the current military appears to be going on. This kind of thing may have an impression on the kinds of young men that might want to join the military.

I think historically there's probably been a lot of bigoted people in the service, but I'm not sure we should set policy to specifically cater to them just to bump recruitment numbers.

> The wars of recent decades are a big factor, but I can say that this push against Russia also isn't helping. My opinion is that people want to defend their homes, but don't want to risk getting exploded in some unnecessary conflict.

I agree 100% that this is a major factor. I've spoken with many people who are willing to fight to defend their country, but aren't interested in ending up overseas defending oil fields. I don't think it's fair to say that the US is dead set on a war with Russia. Russia is the one invading our allies unprovoked, flooding the internet with disinformation and interfering in our elections. The US might not always respond well to Russia's antics, but I don't think the US is trying to start trouble.

> You don't have to agree with refusing the vaccine, but I hope you understand that many people absolutely didn't want it and the military's insistence on injecting people with this doesn't help among some people.

Military service requires a ton of vaccinations and so antivaxxers were never jumping at the chance to sign on. I'd even suggest that we're probably better off without them anyway. Anyone unwilling to take such a simple step to help protect themselves and their fellow Americans probably won't be the right person for the job, and certainly anyone who is still worried that it's going to turn them magnetic, or give them 5G powers, or worried that it's somehow horrifically dangerous even after 13 billion+ shots have been administered globally without much issue might not be someone whose judgement you want to depend on being able to make quick decisions in a critical situation.
> Once AI systems can outperform CEOs

Random number generator can outperform more than half of the CEOs.

That's not why we have CEOs. Gamblers are a superstitious bunch and they love their lucky monkeys. So they put into law that they are entitled to one lucky monkey per corporation.
> Can a company go to prison or get the death penalty?

In theory, yes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_dissolution
This isn't a property of tenure. This is a property of schools not caring about teaching. Tenured faculty can still be fired for shitty performance. Eliminating tenure will not change the systems that encourage research output over other kinds of work.
I have been thinking along the same lines - the fact that something as comparatively simple and barebones as an LLM can manipulate language symbols well enough to carry on a conversation suggests that it's a lot easier than was previously imagined. I used to think that language was one of the defining characteristics of intelligence, like the instruction set of a cpu, but chatgpt seems like persuasive evidence against that.
If it's better, it should just be named btrfs-progs so folks get confused into installing superior tools.