skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
How to annoy the teacher:

> "Ovulation (release of the yolk from the ovary) occurs every 24 – 26 hours regardless of fertilization (so a rooster is not needed). A hen ovulates a new yolk after the previous egg was laid. It takes 26 hours for an egg to fully form (white and shell added), so a hen will lay an egg later and later each day. Eventually the hen will lay too late in a day for ovulation to be signaled. She will then skip a day or more before laying another egg." (UWisconsin Livestock)

So, the 3 hens must have been at the least productive point in their egg-laying cycle over the initial three-day time period... Now if we have the two-hour daily offset, over 12 days, ummm, maybe two or three days skipped per hen? So, ah, 108-120 eggs is what the farmer could expect from the 12 hens?
On Kawara is a painter known for his 100 years calendar.

https://bernardol.com/100-years-calendar/about.html

For those close to NY metro area, Beacon DIA is a great museum worth visiting that houses some of Kawara's work.
They bought a ghost village in Italy then left it to crumble
I think once they allow sideloading, folks in the open source community will eventually figure out ways to unlock it for other regions.
>If things like life expectancy, health, work life balance, et al matter to you: less so.

The thing is, you need money(a strong industry and a strong market economy) to afford to give your workers all these perks. If you just write them down as laws, many investors will simply avoid setting up shop in your country, meaning the workers in those countries might have good perks on paper but they'll have to settle with much lower wages because of the much fewer opportunities available to them.
Ask HN: What memory allocator is used by default in macOS(Ventura 13.3.1)
Would be really helpful if you can provide any resources for the same!
Cambell was Blair's Tucker.
„The limits of my language mean the limits of my world.“ — Ludwig Wittgenstein

Being bilingual increases the limits of your world. And by that you increase the amount of training data for your neural network which will e.g. avoiding overfitting to specific topics.
Measuring a conversion increase means that there was a net positive.

I know it’s not a popular opinion on HN, but losing some annoyed users is an acceptable trade off if the net result is an increase in conversions.

The truth is that visitors who are so easily annoyed that a simple pop-up will cause them to leave the site weren’t very interested to begin with. If you gain 10 subscribers for every 1 annoyed visitor, it’s still a big net win.

Most visitors aren’t as sensitive to annoyances as a lot of the people in these comments.
I’m not a lawyer, but I really doubt it’d be illegal in the US at least.

Just creating a book from ChatGPT is not against its terms of service, as “ OpenAI hereby assigns to you all its right, title and interest in and to Output. This means you can use Content for any purpose, including commercial purposes such as sale or publication, if you comply with these Terms.” What would be against the TOS is claiming that the output is human generated, so theoretically OpenAI could sue.

The courts have recently held that AI generated images are not copyrightable, so these “books” are basically just public domain content (where they aren’t directly copying existing human generated content). It’s not illegal to republish public domain content as your own.

The thing that might be straight up illegal here is the reviews. Those appear to be completely fake and probably constitute fraud.
You're right; we don't elect PMs. And it's true that Brown was elected as an MP by his constituents; and I was elected chair by my local resident's association. So what?

I still think a PM that doesn't lead their party into an election lacks legitimacy, and isn't a 'proper' PM. The most recent two - Sunak and Truss - weren't elected in that sense, because they didn't have any popular mandate.

We don't elect the party of government either, though; few people can name their MP. They vote based on party leaders, as long as voting is permitted.

The idea that the PM is "elected by the House" is nonsense. No such election occurs.

Being "selected as PM" by the monarch doesn't count at all. It's completely irrelevant (I'm a republican). The monarch appoints anyone that can "command the support of the House", which invariably means the leader of the majority party.

But in the absence of a General Election, the appointee cannot claim a popular mandate, and shouldn't do anything that would "surprise" people. Truss, outrageously, claimed to have a popular mandate, relying on the mandate that Johnson won. But he won his mandate more-or-less exclusively on the Brexit thing.
I dunno, I immediately noted that 12 hens must lay 12 eggs in 3 days (it takes 3 days for a hen to lay an egg). Then I just asked myself how many 3-days are in 12-days--okay, 12 [eggs] * 4 [3-day egg periods] = 48...

I didn't need to resort to pen and paper, but I'm also not in primary school.
Yes it is - that doesn't make it wrong. The type erasure is still a JVM limitation.
It doesn't seem like they care. For the last coupe of years, their packing of books for mailing has been so bad (end result that the books one received would be severely damaged) that I've stopped buying books from Amazon altogether (I'd already stopped buying anything but books due to bad reviews and scams). Most of my friends/work colleagures have done the same.
It always struck me as strange that corporations rely on chance for people to connect and understand what other parts of the org are doing, to find synergies* and suchlike.

That feels like something that absolutely can and should be operationalized* if the success of the company relies on it. Build in easy ways for people to join other teams for a quarter (or whatever), ensure that areas of effort are communicated horizontally and back down in minimally invasive, synchronous manners, have clear domain ownership such that it's easy to know who to reach out to, etc.

It's absolutely bizarre to me to pin success on "employees chatting by the water cooler" or whatever the expectation by upper leadership is when they claim stuff around in person. Don't get me wrong, I like seeing coworkers in person now and again, but I explicitly want to do it just to meet them for socializing and team building; not working.

*(buzzword) Bingo!
Teslas are a bit too rich for my blood, but the MacBook M1 is a very good laptop for its price, and I'm sure M2 is worth its price too ($1000 and $1200 respectively).
But he's quite clearly not a "real life Tony Stark". He didn't invent any of the stuff he sells. He didn't found Tesla, but bought it. He may claim he's directly involved in designing SpaceX rockets, but that's most likely a lie. Or maybe he believes it to be true; a couple of months ago, someone claimed that SpaceX had people whose job it was to distract Musk and make him believe he was contributing.

The way he mismanaged Twitter makes pretty clear he doesn't really know what he's doing. Even if the decision to buy was made after too much wine, he's had plenty of time to sober up since then, but he just keeps doubling down on all the worst decisions.

He's a great salesman. Or was, at least. He was like Steve Jobs who could sell the amazing work of Woz and other Apple engineers. But that charisma has gotten seriously dented now.
Yes, this is true that we lean heavily into Tailwind CSS by default. However, when I implemented our "new" component system in 2021, I designed it so that there was a path forward for Bullet Train on vanilla CSS or Bootstrap if anyone wanted to implement it. I don't have any plans to do it myself, but people (including Tamik, the original theme author for Bullet Train) have expressed an interest. I'd love to see it happen. You can get a sense for how this would be possible from our theme docs at https://bullettrain.co/docs/themes.
> I’m not even surprised because it’s from the continent that still has a lot of kings and queens

1. LVMH stems from France, a company famous for not being really friendly to royals.

2. The bulk of LVMH's brands customers are not royals; they're spawns of neo-liberalism and their wives/daugthers/mistresses: US businessmen, Chinese moguls, Russian oligarchs, UK investment bankers, ...

3. Isn't it sad that US top companies are advertising agencies and mind-manipulative megacorps?
Well. You make a reasonable point. I often just use eww or lynx, so often don't see the worst of it.
Wasn't that license change after AWS started playing funny buggers with Elastic?

So, Elastic then chose to change their license to try and counter it.
If its similar to k9s and lens what sets it apart? Please don’t get upset from my questions, it’s not my intention. I am genuinely just wondering why I would pay for this tool when there are similar tools that are free to use. I actually tried your tool not long ago - I remembered now from the screenshot. At the time it didn’t support proxies if I remember correctly and I didn’t really see anything that would make me switch from k9s (my current favorite because I’m very fast using it with the keyboard). Perhaps I will try it again to see what’s changed.
Louis Vuitton (the handbag company that composes the L and V in LVMH) runs a 100,000 sq ft factory in Texas: https://www.americanmanufacturing.org/blog/louis-vuitton-ope...
I didn't have time to read all of it, but it seems to focus a bit much on the imaginary numbers aspect of complex numbers, and how they're all spooky and weird.

Reading this abstract[1] and this[2] StackOverflow discussion about the topic, it seems the point is rather more along the lines that complex numbers aren't just plain two-dimensional vectors of real numbers. There's an extra constraint involved by requiring that i^2 = -1, which could be written other ways, that ties the two elements of the tuple together. It seems quantum physics requires this constraint in order to describe reality.

Then again, I'm just a programmer.

[1]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04160-4

[2]: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/691623/how-does-...
"local archaeologists believe that the bath
may have served a religious purpose for
high-ranking members of the Inca empire"

I knew I was going to find that in the article and I hate it. Don't know if the "religious purpose" excuse is the archeologist playing safe or the journalists reporting it.

It's an indoor pool, the only other purpose it probably had was having sex in it.
Creating you own company; hiring junior remotely and having a big success going that proves the article wrong and is another viable option.
> Tesla is (in)famously overvalued.

> Their market cap is higher than most other car manufacturers (pumping out many times more vehicles than Tesla is), most of whom have caught up on EVs (is Toyota the only big manufacturer still lagging on EVs? I think they are)

Tesla is a top 5 car manufacturer by earnings at $14B for 2022.
Toyota is next up that list at earnings of $20B.

Tesla sell almost 0.5 million EVs a quarter and has a 60% EV market share in the US, it sells more than everybody else combined currently, and is growing very fast. Hard to know how it will all shake out but so far nobody has caught up. Doesn't mean they can't but they are chasing. EV share of the US market is only 7% but is clearly the future, and again, Tesla has 60% (!) share in that market segment.

Looking forward there is the Gigafactory in Mexico and the Cybertruck release. If that is a hit Tesla will maintain its market leader position in 2024 and surpass Toyota in earnings. And they keep dropping prices. With smaller earnings than Tesla, and no institutional knowledge of making EVs it is hard to come up with a reason how and why Toyota can end up with a larger share of the EV market - suddenly they will find themselves in the position of the scrappy startup and Tesla the incumbant. That is the reason for the market cap, not mean tweets or dank memes - investors don't care about that.

Probably the list of EV leaders will be mostly new companies like Tesla, not legacy brands. Maybe some Chinese companies. Whatever the case it will look very different than today.
Yes absolutely, but the trick is that you don't go to all the talks. Every con I've ever gone to has had official and unofficial networking events and I've learned far, far more from talking to people there than I've learned going to talks that I'm only kinda interested in and will be published later
First edition Shakespeare text from 1623 goes on display
The other thing I'm wondering, even though this is veering quite far off the original topic, but: I don't just want all the sources that the AI used in responding to my question, I also want all the other sources that seemed relevant to my question but were for some reason not used.

I want completeness (i.e. if source material is being skipped, I want to be the one to make the decision that it can safely be skipped), and I want consistency (i.e. I want to be able to double-check that the same set of sources wouldn't also support drawing conclusions that contradict those drawn by the AI).

In other words: I'd still want to use search as a product, and I'd still want someone to solve the search problem for me, even if question answering were a solved problem.
This is a remarkably low quality comment. I normally don’t see stuff so crude on HN. Are you lost?
This is so Microsoft
> Companies would much rather use them instead of proxies with varying degrees of accuracy.

I sure wouldn't. I'd much rather ask someone about relevant experience than put them through an IQ test, or similar set of abstract puzzles.
To be fair the Hebrew version use the word "remesh" which is not clearly translated to "everything that moves", but more to "invertebrates" or "insects" (I do not know what the author of Genesis actually meant, but the point is that it is not a clear translation).

Additionally, in Genesis 1:24-26, remesh is listed among other types of animals such as beasts of the land and birds of the sky, so it is pretty clear that it is not meant as all animals. In these phrases remesh appears in the English translation as "creeping thing".

https://biblehub.com/hebrew/remes_7431.htm
That last example would mean more if The Sex Pistols hadn't long ago been thoroughly absorbed into and reapprpriated by the establishment.

Imagine if they'd shared a contemporary work calling the monarchy a fascist regime.

As it stands it was just a cute joke, and in a way only served to reinforce the soft power of parliament by entering into a playful discourse with it.
I have yet to see a legal argument that says the output of ChatGPT is free from derivative works claims. So you can't assert ownership of the output, but that doesn't mean someone else can't assert rights on the grounds of derivative works.

It is one of the reasons I don't see Copilot going anywhere. Any company that uses it can't assert ownership over their own IP, and if Copilot accidently reproduces a chunk of training data verbatim then someone else can.
This article doesn’t seem to account for stock compensation which can greatly incentivize staying at a company for a long time
We worked together with influencers Mimi and Alex Ikonn to craft a beautiful app to help you set goals and track your progress in order to achieve a better lifestyle.
Yes, 8MiB per CPU process, if I'm not mistaken.
> HRT was supposed to (among other things) reduce breast cancer incidence.

"among other things" wasn't a small group.

HRT was suppposed to stave off osteoporosis, many forms of heart disease, help with obesity and diabetes, and ameliorate lots of menopause symptoms (hot flashes, brain fogs, etc.).

The fact that it made breast cancer worse overrode all of those.

> That's the theory and hope. Has it been actually observed yet?

Like, duh.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...
Like it or not, Musk has worked hard at tying Twitter to his personal brand since he took over. Consider that Twitter has no PR department outside of Elon himself. It's not as closely tied as something like Tesla, but still if you don't like Elon or his politics you're less likely to pay for verification. This means that the checkmark now has an associated political/social connotation. No it's not 100%, but it's there.

Edit: This applies in reverse as well. There are definitely fans/admirers of Elon who subscribed immediately as a show of support. But I admit all of this is anecdata, I don't have numbers on how widespread it is.
Nope, when I write tests in my Rust the out of box cargo test will check those tests pass.

If I wrote inline Markdown documentation for part of the Rust code with an example, cargo test will try to build my example, and check it works - not much good having a purported "example" which doesn't even work, is it? And yet many languages don't do this.
>Isn't it funny that the country that supposedly is the biggest innovators in the world, are one of the biggest consumers of luxury goods?

Not really. That's exactly what you'd expect, since the ones that innovate have the money to buy luxury goods.

>Who is the fool here really, the one who sells the luxury goods, or the ones that buy it?

Talking about fools, since Tesla is apparently also an overhyped luxury company, who is the real fool here: the ones who make it (the US) or the ones who buy it (Europe)?
On one of my trips the Sault charger was out of service. Not a big deal because the car warned us about it ahead of time and we made sure to charge up at Blind River, but that would have been problematic if we were driving a Standard Range Tesla. It's a tough stretch because it's almost completely Provincial Park between the Sault and Wawa.
Thanks! Just a mix of ChatGPT + Spotify. Nothing new on the tech front, just dipping my toes into AI tools :D
But submissions here doesn't have anything to do with Bing indexation.
I know some people who put on US conferences and holy shit they put in an incredible amount of work and do not make money at all
I wasn’t saying you were confused, I was saying that responses to my comment had not grokked what exactly I thought was surprising.
I kind of wonder if maybe they look for certain words in the output (or run it through some sort of sentiment analysis) and if it fails they submit the prompt again with a very strongly worded system prompt (after your prompt) instructing it to reject the command and begin with the phrase “As an AI language model”.

Like, I haven’t heard about a way they could actually implement filters this powerful “inside” the model, it feels like it’s probably a less elegant system than we’d imagine.
UK Govt Launches £100M AI Foundation Model Taskforce to Build and Adopt Safe AI
Well, they could do it like Mulvad VPN and allow cash payments + whatever your account number is. (Account number isn't tied to you)
I doubt $100K is anything like a typical profit for putting on a small time conference, i.e. one that can be done with just some additional volunteer staff to help with registration etc. A conference like that is doing well to get a few hundred attendees and even a $100-200 registration fee is probably on the high side. OK. Maybe you can get some sponsorships but that's another task to do--and vendors get a lot of requests for sponsorships. Considering all the expenses, you're probably doing a good job if you breakeven--especially for a conference with no track record and an existing attendee mailing list.
I agree, although I will add that one of the biggest breakthroughs I came up with was when I transitioned to remote when most other people still worked at the office (this is long before covid). I changed something so that I can use it remotely, and that had a profound impact down the line -- it coincidentally fixed some licensing/piracy issues we had and made the product better in several ways.

I think the moral of the story is that more diversity, in as many ways as we can apply that word, is probably a benefit to most organizations.
> Tools like Donut help a bit but the magic is still lost.

You can keep your magic, I'm gonna stay in my home office.
constitutional monarchies also dominate the top of democracy ratings

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index

turns out separating politicians from the concept of The State works quite well
I have relatives who work for a police department. There are some people who have put in their 30 years (or whatever it is) and are entitled to collect most of their salary for the rest of their lives once they retire. But they don’t want to retire, so they continue to work basically for free. If they retired, somebody new would be hired to take their position. For jobs like that, it’s a zero-sum game.
> it's a tough sell to tell your management chain ...

Sounds like a weird management chain then.

Generally I've seen the conversation go along the lines of "we should 'contribute' these changes back, so the upstream people can check them over for bugs, and we don't have to write this stuff again for the next product".
I was going to say... seems like there's a whole lot of LVMH stores in Bellevue. Must be unrelated
As a side note for people wondering why they have so much debt, it's mostly from their financing department. The list of most indebted companies is comprised of mostly car makers for that reason: VW, Ford, Toyota and BMW make up half the top 8.
These luxury goods companies, particularly the beauty/cosmetics brands such as Sephora, behave much more like software companies than many realize. High upfront capital requirements but extremely high gross margins and recurring business models. The biggest difference is the emphasis on brand, where really only Apple has done an equivalently strong job imo.