skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> What's stopping from people from sharing accounts?

I guess if the ScalperAccount has a dedicated wallet that only has one asset, and that wallet's private key is sold, sure. Of course, there would be no guarantee that you're not being scammed when you send payment and never receive the private key. When done on-chain, there is a guarantee that you will receive the NFT you purchased.

People do this today with video game accounts, usually ones that have a single game or subscription obtained through gray or black market transactions.

But in an NFT-enabled world, you would need to be signed into the seller's wallet to attend the event and it wouldn't be your normal wallet. Identity could be confirmed cryptographically with an attestation or heuristically by having some amount of additional assets in the buyer/seller wallets (because everything would go with the wallet if private keys were shared).

Also if people traded private keys in this way, they would lose out of value adds like POAPs that contribute to your history, which could be useful for getting better tickets in the future or proving social status or whatever.

In this case, NFTs allow for a secondary market to exist with additional stipulations (such as revenue sharing) via smart contracts.

Of course, all of this can be done with centralized services, but decentralized protocols have much better interoperability and trust than centralized databases with web APIs, which is the whole point of a trusted distributed ledger.
Red Hat has a lot more products/initiatives than just RHEL, which I assume is their golden goose
Next release from 8.0 branch will be 8.0.1 even if it's released in 2024.
This is so funny. I've noticed these lame influencers shilling AI strategies on twitter even though I don't follow them. But the algorithm sees engagement from others so it thinks I'll like it too.

There's a pattern developing on twitter (and other socials).

Life coach types, just shill the next big thing.

It was Crypto, then NFTs, now AI.

Wonder what will be next?
First up-close images of Mars’s little-known moon Deimos
It is indeed excellent. y-partykit is a library for building a backend on PartyKit, but PartyKit itself isn't tied to Y.js; you can deploy any tech you want on to it.
I worked in-office for about a year and a half. Then I switched fields and companies right before the pandemic hit, so I was effectively starting over again. I did not find being in-office vs remote to be particularly impactful on my ability to be effective, get feedback, and get up to speed. Obviously this is a very small sample size based solely on my personal experience.
this comment deserves a [Ask HN] post. There is a huge untapped market for tactile, responsive, simplified & elegant products / tools / appliances / vehicles. We just need to articulate & define the market segment well. “Responsive Utility” or “Full Control Appliances” . Unfortunately the positive qualities of “simple, long lasting, “ and to a lesser degree “intuitive” are presently lost to many/ most consumers.

My dream would be resurrecting 1990s mazda with 3 models: the hatchback, 90s-size pickup truck , and the miata. All tactile control interior. Modern drivetrain efficiency ( direct injection, variable timing) . Primitive ICs (just air/ fuel mix, ABS, and minimal ODB-II features) .

There is a huge market of guys who just want usable, long-lasting, responsive & intuitive tools
Make is one of the best tools I've ever come across, but with one big caveat that none of your files must have spaces on their names or all hell breaks loose. Seems like a reasonable trade off to me :)
My point is that transit is never faster than car, obviously if you close the streets to vehicles you can make places reachable only by foot. You can as well ban bicycles and biking won't be faster than anything. That is also the easiest way to fix a the daily HN thread about cars being too big and scaring cyclists:)
JWST spots planetary building blocks in a surprising galaxy
At community conferences, I think there are three major constituencies.

* Attendees. I think the author did a good job of explaining what they get out of conferences. Travel! Diffuse connections that may or may not turn into more later, but are missed when not available. Plus some incidental learning.

* Sponsors. These folks put up some money to have a seat at the table. As a sponsor, you can support the community and get a good reputation, recruit (as author mentions), or have sales conversations. That's about it.

* Speakers. These provide content for the attendees. Either paid (devrel) or on their own initiative. Speakers want to share their ideas, increase their brand, and connect with others (speakers and attendees).

It's tough to put on a community conferences without all three of these actors being present.
Why is a water tank a consumable item?
> we should be more critical of animal studies

Definitely! That is completely legitimate and suffering must be avoided as much as possible.

But sometimes such experiments are necessary and cannot be easily avoided. The alternatives are not understanding what is happening (which is ok if the thing is harmless; I don’t think that this is the default hypothesis for nano-plastics), or doing the analytical experiments in humans.

> I'm having problems seeing what usable data was extracted from these mice that wouldn't have been found some other way

Off the top of my head, in this setting we control exactly the amount of particles and their size, which is important to assess the mechanisms by which they penetrate the tissues.

Looking at dead humans has a huge sampling bias (people giving their body are not representative of the population as a whole), and we have no idea about the kind of particles they were exposed to, or of any other factor that could affect what we want to quantify. Maybe some kinds of substances can increase or decrease penetration rates (things that affect blood pressure, for example). In a controlled setting, we know that all mice were exposed to exactly the same conditions.
> you may learn some factoids about physics

are MIT lectures "factoids" now?

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=mit+opencoursew...

> Gen z isnt just learning physics by idly watching veritasium videos.

This is a massive generalisation. Sure, I'd probably agree with you that a large cohort are watching a lot of trash. But there's a sizeable amount who are putting the work. And I imagine that the percentage of those putting in the work probably increases the closer they are to the poverty line growing up.
Geomagnetic effects happen on scales measured in tens or hundreds of miles/km. There is no particular threat to rooftop solar unless the event is on a scale comparable to a nearby EMP burst from a nuke attack. In which case you probably aren't too concerned about your solar installation as a first order priority.

It also isn't correct to assume that the grid is wholly unprotected. Substations have extensive protection in the form of interrupters. We will lose power in a Carrington scenario, potentially for days, but there won't be an apocalypse of exploding transformers. If that happens, nobody is going to care too much about charging their Teslas. They will be too busy fending off hordes of radioactive zombies.
I had a college job as Computer Operator for a University where they had Band Printers.

NOISY as F**, screaming with a metal ribbon containing character-shapes being hammered by a 132-head (yes) static print-head.

Could print a page every second or two - and could feed paper quickly across blank regions.

Those things were the size of modern trans cans (with the folding lids). And they were insulated for sound.
> That the EU doesn’t have a meaningful (in terms of revenue production) technology or engineering industry

I don't know what definition you're using here, but I think describing e.g. Airbus as "not meaningful revenue" is surprising. What _do_ you mean (not just you but all the "EU has no industry" people) both by "meaningful" and a definition of the industry sector?
But reference counting is just a tiny subcomponent of Rust's GC. The majority of Rust's automatic memory management is based on affine types and static code analysis, not refcounting. You're just picking subcomponents to make Java solution look better, but what matters for developers is the whole picture.

And BTW, I wouldn't be so sure about throughput either.
ZGC is capable of allocation rates of the order of only ~5 GB/s, which is way below the theoretical memory bandwidth. I bet jemalloc can do much better.
Still happened though, right?
Here's a chart framework for Bullet Train https://supercharts.dev
French here, never heard someone say "bon viveur", pretty sure if you said that in a conversation you would be corrected. "bon vivant" is very common.
I think parent speaks more about younger people. By the time you get to calculus, you're probably expected to be mature and somewhat independet.
Sorry didn't see this reply or would've commented sooner. So you certainly would need some sort of structured instructions. And there are specific methods for teaching specific languages to people from certain languages. Where the rapid compounding happens is in listening to the native tutor speak. The speaking/listening comprehension portion of language learning is the hardest. When you do pattern matching with Duolingo you're missing out on some of that vital ear training that happens listening to native speakers -- that's why immersion works so well.

So I find it's still best to find someone who is a native speaker, has a language teaching certificate/degree, and to go from there. They'll spot your weaknesses and help you navigate them all while providing a customized ramp, for your learning speed, of all the language's components. Duolingo might spend two weeks on a verb tense that you understood right away or fly over some pronouns that you struggled integrating. This whole time you'll be picking up word choice, intonation, rhythm of speaking from the native tutor that will expedite your usage of the language conversationally.
The problem with typical OS-provided mutex is that it is almost always in some way distinctly non-cheap either because of the particular implementation or because of limitations imposed by ABI/API compatibility (and in some case both).
Most of our leaders are much less bright and much more self-centered than almost anyone would imagine. The evidence repeatedly validates this, but we're reluctant to believe it. Many do come from relatively elite backgrounds but their knowledge and morality have surprising gaps.
Out of curiosity (I really believe the popup increases your total revenue), have you tried other similarly emphasized but non-blocking prompts?

Like sliding it down from the title, or a block in the middle of the text?
> create a stockpile of transformers

At least one electricity network on the west coast of Norway already does this to cope with the inevitable damage caused by seasonal thunderstorms.
<3 my experience https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35689516
https://jaskaransaini.com/social-media-is-dead/
How long must a company own a product before we can safely say it’s just business and/or market conditions and not the result of new owners? Is 4 years not enough? How about 10?
>That's not really counterpoint, it's just a occasional problem behavior of some individuals that remote makes more difficult

Yet anecdotally, it has occurred in every open office so far. Managers were also eager to applaud this behavior rather than berate it, while at the same time looking at the actual work performed, scratching their heads why nothing was happening and then giving said individuals special treatment. I'm not alone in experiencing this, either.

>One big problem with remote is that it makes a whole lot of stuff that can happen organically in an office into intentional practices that require discipline, which means they're a lot easier to neglect.

"That's not really a counterpoint, just coach them not to do that." If your argument against my point is 'well just teach people differently, also it doesn't happen that often at all (despite it being a common complaint on the internet)', you'll also have to argue why your point is special enough not to deserve the same response.

Companies relying on a lack of documentation and individuals using said documentation is a humongous risk even outside the remote debate, and that's most of the requirements for remote covered. Those 'organic intentional practices' don't seem so great when 80% of the seniors on the team leave without a paper trail and the remainder knows zilch.
I have a pretty complicated system of planning (and executing) tasks for the next day. (The system started very simple about 2 years ago and grew organically with me.) My plans are pretty tight in the morning, when I want to do a lot of stuff very efficiently (my normal schedule from 5:20 to about 7:00 contains 8 tasks ranging from 1-2 to 25 minutes, has a resolution of 5 minutes and very small buffers until about 6:15, when it becomes a bit more lax), more lax from, say, 9-10 to 17-18 (usually tasks from 45 to 90 minutes, with 15-30 minutes buffers in between) and _very_ lax in the evening (1-3 tasks taking 5-10 minutes each). The system is heavily gamified (which works well on me, YMMV) and connected to Beeminder (note: I'm not affiliated with them, just a satisfied customer (and an author of one of the alternative clients)). One key observation is this: motivation is overrated, discipline is king. Another one is: plan for breaks and rest. And another: getting enough sleep is one of the top priorities. Yet another: consistency trumps short-term bursts of activity by a very large margin. (One of the key features of my system are generous buffers. Even if I fail to perform 75% of my planned stuff one day, it doesn't matter much in the long term, because it's just one day.) Also, measuring time you need to do things is very helpful when planning/estimating.

Just a few random thoughts - I can expand on every one of them if you want.
Teslas are essentially computers with cars built around them.

Traditional have cars and they are trying to shove computers into them.

The traditional model of upgrading infotainment software has been "lol, buy a new car" for a good quarter of a century now. But now Tesla is changing the expectations with Joe mode and Dog mode starting as someone requesting stuff from Elon and the feature appearing OTA in a matter of weeks.

Dog Mode, is still a rarity in EVs for some reason. It's a dead simple feature: "allow the heating/ac to work while car is locked, optionally display internal temperature on infotainment display so that people don't break the windows to 'rescue' the dogs".

The few that have it (Polestar and Mercedes I think) limit the usage to max 30 minutes.
As a general rule, the quality of manufacturing output has far less to do with the workers, and more to do with the procedures that they're made to follow.

If you put people in a situation where they can only produce crap, then that's what you'll get.
M1/M2 Macs Have Bluetooth Issues with the Mouse, Cursor, and Magic Trackpad 2
Even if you're limited to uniform sampling, something as simple as the trapezoid rule will give you quadratic convergence instead of linear for the naive Sum(f(t_i) * delta). In other words, error proportional to 1/n^2, instead of 1/n, where n is the number of samples, which is going to be a huge difference. There are many methods depending on the constraints of your problem - your ability to choose sampling intervals, knowledge of the bounds of your function or its derivatives, etc. The PSA is to study these things, instead of just writing the first thing that seems familiar from a long-ago calculus class.
Yet it’s more than a 50% drop from the average of the last twelve quarters.
This is the outcome of the clash between equality vs. equity.

Equality doesn't mean equality of opportunity. Equality of opportunity is equity, which is a communist lie.

It seems like a lot of folks bought into the idea that we can somehow achieve equity in society. Unfortunately, the pursuit of equity leads to totalitarianism of one sort or another.
Show HN: Learn About Deceptive (“Dark”) Patterns and Their Legal Implications
This website (formerly darkpatterns.org) was launched in 2010 and had a warm reception on hacker news. It has just had a big update with new sections on laws and legal cases, so you can have a better understanding of what might be illegal or risky to build.
It isn't, but it's a good excuse to let entrenched industry collect their rent.
The point is the coffee breaks and networking. Not the talk themselves.
Cables with reversible Micro USB plugs exist. Those are the only ones I use.
The problem isn't remote work. The problem is tradional in-office management and leadership that don't understand remote isn't just add Slack or add Teams and you're a remote-able team.

There's more to it than that.

But once again leadership blames the proles for getting it wrong.
Why would you measure per country? Countries don't actually exist. You think measuring it by artificial borders drawn by the imagination makes sense? No it doesn't. It makes less sense then per Capita.

Following your line of logic, Antarctica emits the least greenhouse gases of any country or continent. Per Capita doesn't matter so whatever Antarctica does, they're doing it right.. nothing to do with the fact that the country is practically empty.

It's not spiritual at all. The realistic measure is per Capita. If you aren't measuring it this way... and I say this to be factual and with no intention to offend .. but if a person isn't measuring it this way when they have awareness of the per Capita factor then that person is concretely (not spiritually) stupid.

You are not definitely not stupid. For something as severe as climate change the per Capita measurement matters absolutely.
“Lawful access” is the new soundbite for putting backdoors in all our software and hardware.
They’re malicious. It’s not that they don’t understand, or that some well worded essay will ever give them their “aha” moment.

They want power over you, and this is just another means to that end.
The article says IBM has laid of 5,000 and has hired 7,000 - sounds to me like typical IBM shenanigans to replace expensive employees with cheap ones.

When I was there the gimmick was that you either relocated to a third world country and took a local wage, or you resigned.
> Underrated aspect of paid checks and longer tweets with amplification is that Twitter 2.0 has basically recreated LinkedIn broetry.

https://twitter.com/RMac18/status/1650265151227174912
RC5-72 is 10.000% complete
> Hell you can make it blink.

No thanks
Why do we need to cure cancer?
that's an interesting angle, I wonder if this pattern of defaulting to "because we don't meet in person" is that a giveaway for some lacking of communicating in writing I wonder. Just people who can't get an idea out effectively in textual form for complex ideas on a repeated basis and chalking it up to needing that in person outlet. That's curious, does being face to face elicit other modes of communication and ability to articulate and connect things. Maybe. But I suppose it could also be an opportunity to lean on the "see what I mean", "do you know what I'm saying" and allow body language and other social lubricant type bits and pieces to smooth glossing over when another doesn't follow or see what they mean.
Netron(https://github.com/lutzroeder/netron) comes to mind.
Google robot learns to sort the recyclables left in office waste bins
the article says everyone shouted 12 not Three
How is that at all the same as "we wont let you use our apps if you have unsourced apps on your phone."

There's no cost to wiping the phone. It doesnt require you to drive to an apple store and have them do it.

This also isnt a phone part. It's not "you cant have a new battery until you wipe your phone."
The irony here is that asserting that nobody else can be correct if they don't "validate" you is the definition of dismissiveness.

I have actually done what OP is proposing, and found it to be inadequate. I tried to explain why.
As is gnome 3
Do "Point/Counterpoint"-style shows still exist? I haven't watched cable news for a long time, but my understanding is that all the debate-style shows are gone because people don't really want the opposing view, people just want the echo chamber.
This post went viral across Facebook & Reddit with 100k+ views and after that I am seeing more and more social media experts talk about social media being less social.

I even got banned from a marketing group just sharing that social media is getting less social. My ban alone proved that Admins wanted to share more of their company content instead of having useful marketing content.
No idea how you get the 3 year warranty and $400 for 16GB together.
Just muscles and bones without fat is also dangerous. I think we should get out this thinking that only thing needed is engineering and sales. It works for a company just starting up.. but as you grow larger, there are many other roles that are equally critical.
>"The og ape clubhouse noises, The og lazy lion twitter raids, The og @ohhshiny twitter spaces, the og NFT culture that built the 2021 peak market. All gone forever. The current NFT culture is this: Greed, shadiness and scams"

It's remarkable how much of this sounds like the lamentations we have for Web 1.0, back when the Internet was fun and creative and there were no corporate sites to speak of.

We now come full circle, with Web3 speedrunning the history of the WWW.
This post spends a lot of time criticizing the "pointless line breaks" but not a lot of time on why this is a problem or "must be stopped". Block or mute the people that annoy you and move on; problem solved.
> Many only know Gradle.

True, but maybe 1% knows make. And since many of them run Windows, many don't even know how to install the correct version of make on their development box.
Yes, https://toprubycompanies.info
LVMH is a conglomeration of a bunch of French brands including distilleries, champagne houses, and vineyards. It has been a republic more or less since 1870 and some time before that also. Many of those brands were founded when it was a monarchy, ironically.
> Most mid-level and senior people have not learned the skills to mentor while working remotely.

I cannot think of a scenario where if I needed help with something I couldn't have a 5-minute conversation with someone.

Slack conversations I have several times a week:
"Hey do you have a sec to help me? I can't seem to reproduce X bug"
"Yea, wanna huddle?"
"Sure!"

I don't know what new skills someone would have to learn in order to do that.
Should have clarified - I mean anyone who owned any existing assets before the pandemic.

Though honestly, unless you were buying absolute junk, you’re likely still up a great deal. Bitcoin is up over 20k from the pandemic lows, SPX is up 77%, even stocks that got hammered like Meta are up from the pandemic bottom.

Anyone who lost money during this period likely had themselves to blame for not exercising basic risk management.
>The store's "tap-to-pay" system charged not only one, but three credit cards tucked in a wallet inside her purse.
>
>"I haven't taken them out of my purse yet. What are you talking about?" said Cesari. "I'd say I was two feet away at that point, for sure."

Not in a million years. Long-distance NFC requires a large, tuned antenna — and with collisions due to multiple cards being in the field, forget about it.
I grew up in a small dusty town in the middle of an African desert. I taught myself everything I know from the web, IRC and forums. I was top of numerous IS and CS classes at university. In my professional career, I've learned the most from colleagues who happened to be overseas. I almost never do video calls.

I make sure to spend a lot of time mentoring via screen share and encourage recordings (many times this is way more useful than an in-person session where the details are forgotten).

High quality learning relationships can be entirely remote and text/screen-share based.