skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They could. Perhaps they will, but they may need to charge for it if Bing is charging them for those fancy features.
I have used CPAP for 12 years (1 Philips, 2 Resmed Airsense 10). Each one was provided under different health insurance, United Healthcare, Blu Cross Blue Shield and Cigna. I prefer paying a single lump sum for my co-pay, but some insist on 10 monthly payments if the supplier can verify you are using the unit.

But wait, there's more. Each insurer had a different schedule for how often you should change the tubing, mask, hose and filters. I have boxes of spare parts because I would not replace per the insurer's schedule. I always replaced the air filters, always used distilled water and cleaned, but never placed a tank. The mask and hose are sturdy, so I clean and reuse until they leak too much.
Yes, certainly not my area. As far as I know the M1917 is just a P14 chambered in .06. The P13/14 Lee-Enfield was built/designed as an improvement to the SMLE, though as you say, probably incorrect to call it a “derivative” so much as a successor (though an ill-fated one).
The thumbnail is triggering people's youtube bullshit detectors.

That big shot of the reviewer's face. The giant red arrow. The bright background. The breathless title with ALL CAPS. That's like 4/5 for clickbait videos. All it's missing is the face showing some ridiculously exaggerated emotion.
We saw a master class of this during the last 3 years of the "pandemic".

I find it frightening how western liberal countries are becoming more and more like China, possibly in an attempt to beat them.
Citation regarding Oberon.

The code has been available for years before Oak was born, it is even on the book.
It’s meant for short lived apps where you simply wouldn’t get OOM either way. I don’t know about an objective definition for what a GC is, one I quite like is “gives the illusion of infinite memory”, based on that it isn’t a GC.

But there are also conservative GCs, RCs, etc, that fail different definitions also (leaving behind circular dependencies, having false positives, in reverse order), like in case of many things in CS, there isn’t an objective definition.
Well I’ve never seen anyone below director (or vp in larger orgs) meaningfully decide anything related to budgeting beyond some stupid team offsite thing. Hiring you can scratch off too right now lol. Company goals again this is vp level, everyone below is just a messenger. And finally most management dont stay long enough to meaningfully participate in career dev unless you mean handing out promos at review time (sounds like that should only take a few weeks a year)
gVisor improves filesystem performance using rootfs overlay
gVisor recently rolled out a filesystem optimization which substantially improves filesystem performance for sandboxed workloads. It involves setting up a overlayfs mount for the container root filesystem in gVisor's user-space kernel. This blog has more details about how this optimization works and how much performance boost can be seen by certain workloads.
A law prohibiting child porn would make child porn illegal, not monitor my transactions and prevent encryption. That’s called the redistribution of consequences.
I recall when I started even with Rails pre Rails 2.0, the Spring framework was a horror show. Good luck with XML plumbing and then annotations wiring and then dependency injection container and AbstractBusinessProxyFascadSingletonFactory whereas in contrast, Rails seems light years ahead from controllers to templating to ORM.
I'm not really concerned.

More likely, we are currently experiencing a calibration phase for a new technology, during which individuals are attempting to gauge others' understanding and interest in it.

Right now, everybody is shouting "You have to look at this awesome thing!!", while in fact others are already aware of it, or even tired of it. Hence the complaints. This will pass quickly.
Well, our leaders serve two goals: The voters' will and the fairness of the law.

Nothing requires to vox populi of some issue to agree with its own opinion of five minutes ago, or its own current opinion in a similar issue. Your opinion as voter can be as fickle as it pleases you. The law requires fairness, though, and our leaders are the unfortunates whose job it is to tell the voters about the longer-term principles and try to shape people's opinions. To make them less fickle and more principled.

Now, which principle? I don't mind if a particular politician or party tries to shape voters' opinions around the principles in that politician's or party's program.
It wasn't. Noam Chomsky readily acknowledges that it was coined by Walter Lippmann in 1922's "Public Opinion".
Files with spaces in the name are just a bad idea anyhow, Make is just helping out by making the problem more explicit.
Some content creators are going viral, thanks to ChatGPT
They didn't light all of the engines for the static test, I think.
A lot of these AI tools are going to be grafted on to existing products without thinking through user consent or the overall experience so companies can show that they’re “AI forward”
EMPs to kill the AI.

(I kid. (mostly))
I fell for this once when I was a newer developer. I bought a book on my Kindle about Ruby on Rails, thinking it might be more insightful or accessible than the Rails docs. But every chapter was literally just copy/pasted from the Rails docs (which are free).
Indeed, it is based on Objective-C semantics.
> There exists an entire subject in political science dealing with how to increase compliance with the schemes of regulators (see Nudge Theory).

It’s a very cynical view of the potential for human government that believes there is no way that the democratic will of the people affects what goals ‘regulators’ pursue.

Consider the possibility perhaps that the point of government is to overcome the prisoner’s dilemma and move people into a better collective equilibrium than they will naturally settle into. Nudges can be a useful tool for creating better outcomes for everyone.

In theory, at least.
What I really think you're saying is that Tailwind is a huge time saver when it comes to design, and compared to your past experiences translating designs to CSS it felt like a net win.

A lot of people disagree with Tailwind's design philosophy on both the developer and consumer side of the code (i.e. DX and UI), so it's questionable what "real project" and "time saver" really mean; ironically, I question that your definition of "real project" even included a team with design chops.
My plan is to save enough money to at least quasi-retire in my 50s.
Right. If you want, you can get high power service at home and wire up your own private "supercharger" that only costs whatever the standard rate for industrial buyers is.

You're paying for a service.
FIRE has so much MMM and other baggage associated with it, I prefer to avoid the term. What is true is that, as you get late career, it's probably simultaneously more difficult to land a new job, starting something brand new may be less appealing, and you may be in a position to not work full-time as an employee even if the move isn't quite on your own terms.

Personally, I've been in the position for about 5 years now where I could have ended up mostly retiring if that's what was in the cards. And it's a very liberating feeling even if you don't have to or choose not to exercise it. Makes it far more of a non-event (for you personally) when layoffs come knocking.
Taxing financial assets has a lot of the same privacy-invading, subjective-enforcement, and loophole problems as taxing income.

However, most corporations own a lot of other assets that are already registered with the government, or pay rent to other corporations that do: real estate, mineral rights, and intellectual property. If we can figure out how to tax these things, that could help.
I just assume everyone on Twitter is a bot. Saves me the hassle of dealing with the platform.
Thanks, I was thinking of exactly this post so it's useful you shared it!
As a junior that also just started before COVID forced everyone into remote, my experience has been that team culture is the deciding factor. I've always been extremely vocal in communicating ideas, acquiring feedback and asking for help digitally, but my experience has been split for the two teams I've been yet.

The first team was just set up as the pandemic hit and thus had all collaboration happen online. This created structures that fit a remote-first approach and even worked after work got hybrid again. All important discussion happened online, we had ways to spontaneously get help and enough formats to get creative. And it worked, I never felt left out, all blockers for everyone got cleared as fast as you would expect and feedback cycles were good.

I can't say the same about my second team however. While it's officially hybrid, I'd say 70% are coming into the office every day, while the other 30% (me included) work basically exclusively remote. And it isn't working well, the office people just have their own bubble. They exchange ideas and communicate offline and it's hard to be part of that. I tried integrating digital tools, I tried talking about it, but it just doesn't work. I can plant seeds for new ideas, I can ask for feedback, but the second I communicate it to the office bubble, I'm not part of it anymore. This isn't intentional obviously, but when they talk about stuff at the coffee machine or during lunch, the idea will start developing by itself, while I have no way to take part in it. And who can blame them? If you have a good idea during lunch, why should they not talk about it? And who wants to provide an official protocol for the remote workers about lunch discussions? And then when I then try to talk about the idea a few days later, I always notice that it advanced without any possibility for me to participate. This sucks obviously, because it massively diminishes my influence to bring in and grow my ideas. And while I do get feedback when I ask for it directly, I have noticed that barely anyone actively informs you about the small 1% stuff that you can improve. Which doesn't sound bad, but if you miss an 1% improvement every week, even in a year it will amount to a big enough sum to matter.

And I think these 2 things do massively influence a career. You need to be the face of a bunch of good ideas if you want any kind of soft power. You do need the small informal feedback someone gives you when getting a coffee, if you want to be the top 10%. And in some hybrid organizations, you will miss out on that.
This is the route I take in my personal projects. Jenkins runs a make file.
Right now AI is a lot like VR headsets. A really cool tech trick but not something that most people want to use regularly. Let the interested early adopter at it, but forcing this on to users will not go very well. It's just too creepy.

Silicon Valley got pretty lucky with figuring out social media, but I think it still does not understand most people very well.
The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (2009)
> It's not as "cool" to get a Tesla anymore, and that's undeniably brand damage.

To unpackage this further: a big part of Tesla's "cool" was that in allowed customers have luxury and performance while not trading off being "green", and by implication being pro-social. It was a have-your-cake-and-eat-it deal, for those who could afford it. People who had to accept tradeoffs bought a Nissan Leaf.

Now there are more EV options, and Musk's behavior has done irreparable damage to the pro-social brand associations that Tesla had. It's now more associated with the tech-bro archetype, and all the baggage that carries, similar to how Wall St guys were associated with Lambos a few decades ago.

That said, I still see plenty of new Teslas on the road in liberal areas, but they are often rationalized in practical terms, not with the religious zeal that customers used to have.
Yeah, you're totally right. Angele Merkel was definitely not internationally minded. (She does not speak English well, nor did her foreign minister.)

It's also a pretty terrible thing to assume that everyone who wasn't born into the upper class isn't internationally minded. Again, my girlfriend doesn't speak English well because she's from a working class family from the east, but she's been to a couple dozen countries, and manages a team of people from several countries.
> The first is technical, the second is social.

I am extremely interested in stats like:

what percentage of LVMH customers/buyers should be purchasing their products at all from a financial-wellness perspective?

How are they so successful at selling the allure of "our products send a positive message of wealth + status in society"?

Why do people (who common don't actually have wealth of any kind) find themselves victim/attracted to this marketing message?
I don't see how those points are mutually exclusive tbh. Yes, internet is quite usefull. Yes, it is also a cesspool, absolutely.
This is an easy take to have on the labor market when you have bargaining power. The fact that highly paid professionals buy so readily into the moneyed class discourse disturbs me.

Here's hoping you don't get displaced by automation and suddenly discover yourself providing zero marginal gains to them. I mean, would you then sit quietly and starve?
The PINs protect a hardware enclave full of cryptographic keys. The PIN never leaves the hardware device it was input into. (It's an equivalent to the button on a Yubikey or something of that nature and there is a reason that PINs are lumped into the same settings as biometric unlocks like Touch ID and Face ID.)

It's an intelligent trade-off, of course, in threat models that involve access to the physical device for threat models that involve remote access of websites and other resources. Yes, if everything uses the same PIN on a device then that adds to the risk of someone snooping your PIN, stealing your device, and accessing many things in the process. If that is the threat model that most concerns you, then yes, this makes things worse. But PINs can't be used remotely at all and never transfer across a wire. They can't be brute forced remotely over the internet. Having someone's PIN but not the specific device that the PIN unlocks doesn't unlock anything (because you still don't have access to any of the private keys on the device without the device). Websites only know your device's public keys. If you use entirely WebAuthn, breached websites only leak public keys. If your threat model involves concerns about internet hackers or the daily breaches we see in services like haveibeenpwned, device-specific PINs are a massive improvement.
You're using very obsolete instances.
Second (later) reply to the same parent comment.

The initial disconnect here seems to be that I'm deliberately eliding a lot of details in order to see all iron products as part of a unified whole, with improvements on a continuum over time. Whereas you seem to see this as an egregious violation of terminology and facts. It's really just a question of which level of detail you want to work at. That kind of objection wouldn't be a problem, except... The problem I have with it, and the reason I will now most likely never be won over to anything you have to say, is because while missing my point (which mind you is small and not that interesting), you jumped right into not only correcting details I left out intentionally, but also asserting that that must mean I'm ignorant of them. Do we need to always say everything we know about metallurgy? I guess it's a dick-waving contest... shoot, I would've brought my whole dick if I'd known. Saying I studied it in college - that wasn't an appeal to authority, it was a hint to you that your lecturing about basics is unneeded, in the hope of changing the context back away from the minutiae.

All iron products are made of iron and are cast at some point. Cast iron is the only one we call "cast iron," and that is an arbitrary, happenstance artifact of history. Terminology is arbitrary symbology, always, and deserves the appropriate skepticism or at least the ability to imagine a world with different symbols. Not even a world... go to a country where they speak another language. They might not even have separate words for "sky" and "heaven." If that feels like a "word game" you need to realize all words are games and are non-deterministic. I don't need to dance around to evade your amazing laserlike prowess at calling out my errors because again, you're arguing minutiae while missing my pretty modest point.

RE Bessemer I left you a giant implicit 'else' clause by saying IF you want to take his patent as a milestone, then it's 9 years. Obviously there are reasons not to particularly take it as a relevant milestone.

You know what, I'll go all the way and actually say the thing you accused me of saying: steel is cast iron. With a bunch of ingredients and processing steps added. I know, I know, it's ridiculous, and bordering on meaningless, because look, a microprocessor is just a rock with a bunch of ingredients and steps added. The point is not to take it to extremes of ridiculousness, the point is to see the similarities and see how processes were added and changed to improve and transform the final product.
The EU lags in software R&D, but they are still a massive player in ONG, Energy, Automotive, Pharma, Defense, and Manufacturing R&D.

A lot of this is country dependent though - eg. Denmark/France are big Pharma players, Norway/Netherlands are major energy sector players, Sweden/France/Germany are major Defense Players, etc.
I love your comment.

I tried GPT-4 via ChatGPT and it nailed it without any prompt engineering.

---

Prompt: 3 hens lay 3 eggs in 3 days. How many eggs do 12 hens give in 12 days?

GPT-4:

Let's first determine how many eggs one hen can lay in 12 days.

We know that 3 hens can lay 3 eggs in 3 days. This means that each hen lays 1 egg in 3 days (3 hens / 3 eggs = 1 hen / 1 egg).

To find out how many eggs one hen can lay in 12 days, we need to multiply the number of eggs laid in 3 days by 4 (since 12 days is 4 times longer than 3 days). So, one hen will lay 1 egg * 4 = 4 eggs in 12 days.

Now, we have 12 hens. To find out how many eggs they can lay in 12 days, we just multiply the number of eggs one hen can lay in 12 days by the number of hens:

12 hens * 4 eggs per hen = 48 eggs in 12 days.

---

To be completely fair, this math problem can be googled, so it is probably in the training set.
Honestly, most of my work experience has been those mythical magic moments just led to a decrease in morale. As a remote worker I am not as invested in the company, and that's a feature, not a bug. I'm doing my job, I'm actively looking to do it well, but frustrations I can't control feel further from me.

I remember distinctly overhearing our internal devops at one place (that was pretty fragmented) talk about how their mandate was to get people only 80% of the way there, that the teams were responsible for getting 100%, and it pissed me off no end, since one of the reasons my department was doing our own devops was that there was no way to take what the devops department was putting out, and leverage it to get to what we wanted (i.e., no path to go from the 80% they provided -> 100% of what we needed). We had tried numerous times to talk to them about it, but they wanted to decide things in isolation and tell us what to do, rather than listening to us. I tried figuring out who was in charge of that group and reaching out to them, and managed a meeting, and they heard and acknowledged the need and agreed change was necessary, then nothing happened with it. Etc. None of that helped my morale, and I ended up leaving that company, not because of that, but because of a number of places where I simply could not affect change.

As a remote employee though? Don't care. As I said, that missing cultural buy in is a feature, not a bug, and it benefits everyone involved. I'm still raising concerns, still trying to reach out for solutions, but invariably when the business prevents me from fixing things I'm not stressing, and am so less likely to leave.
I submitted this as well with a link to the NYTimes article and it got flagged as have a couple of other HN submissions posting this from other news sites.

Who is flagging these submissions? I can't understand why any of the submissions around this story are being flagged.
The Ruby Story
All other things being equal, there's nothing wrong with trying to shove computers into a car.

Trouble starts when the computer is networked and therefore vulnerable to more attacks. And for networked computers, security updates are table stakes. Feature updates are merely nice.

To compare apples to apples, you need to compare Tesla to another brand of networked cars.
The keyboard shortcuts to do this animate much quicker than the swipe does. In the past I've set up BetterTouchTool to press the corresponding key on left and right swipes.

The only disadvantage is that there is no way to "peek" the previous desktop like you can with the built in swipes.
Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) Security Review [pdf]
I'm with Oliver Wendell Holmes (or whoever actually said this) on that one:

"Taxes Are What We Pay for Civilized Society."[0]

[0] https://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/04/13/taxes-civilize/
It was already dead when it was bought. The founder wrote a postmortem: https://medium.com/@ericmigi/why-pebble-failed-d7be937c6232
Do you have a suggestion on how i can a achieve that, low budget?
Often overlooked value of open source: free labor. I bet you’d see a patched driver within a week if the sources were available to enthusiasts.
This. My plan is being financially independent enough to take several months of breaks in between jobs and having the time to look for environments I really enjoy working in.
Terrible, but some mentors are just like that very reluctant. I will say though even if he only wanted to do chat, most services offer that asymmetrical ability where one is screensharing and both are in chat. Still would have taken longer than purely audio but certainly more immediate than pure-chat. So it's odd he didn't opt for that, it's the method with the least friction.
The rules were clear before, what has changed is that they are now different rules. You were just wrong before.

You've still got a problem though, now when you ask the reader to verify the rule, you have to explicitly state that they're not trying to verify the first rule.
The problem with Microsoft always looking to their competition for ideas is the fail to capitalize on their own strengths. They end up chasing Mac OS or Android and create a product that isn't as good as either of those (because chasing the competition is hard) while subsequently throwing away what made their own product competitive and interesting.

Windows should not be a Mac OS clone. But every single UI update sends it in that direction.
"One of the handful of things Twitter still has going for it is that it’s the main place people are talking about A.I"

This is a really strange way to start an article, because I can tell you that here in small town middle of nowhere America, even the old guys down at the VFW hall are talking about AI. I can't get through a full day without someone at random (at Rotary, in the grocery checkout line...) talking about it. Which tells me there's probably as much "get rich quick" and other "gold rush" type BS happening here as there is good computer science.