skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In the legacy project our team inherited, there's a lot of data consistency issues stemming from the lack of foreign keys (we're adding them back now). Data consistency is important because we deal with financial data. Typically, code and data change more often than DB schemas, so every release has a chance that someone will forget to update all relations manually in code, introducing dangling references, for example. Foreign keys help as an additional safety measure, because they don't change as often. I think you should care about the performance of foreign keys only when speed is more important than data consistency. It's a good default.
The same way we reacted to the incredible deluge of spam phone calls in the US: we'll move to platforms that have the best signal-to-noise ratios.
Yes, the only person who can fire Mark is Mark.
Thank you - that was infinitely more helpful than the original article.

And I am now suitably terrified.
Now maybe they have more reason to try - since the college fraud money tap has been closed.
Even if Apple allows third party stores or side loading, its portion is going to be negligible unless regulators force them to change the platform default store (which is not going to happen for a while). The only meaningful competitor in the current era is the Play Store but those duopoly effectively maintain non-aggression pact so they won't likely launch it on iOS. Yeah, finally some hackers may have fun on iOS, but I doubt if this will transform the landscape.

I think allowing third party browser engines actually has much broader, significant implications here; Apple is already making aggressive investments into Safari in order to keep its edge against Chromium based browsers. Hopefully, PWA will finally become a viable development platform, which may weaken this "app store" economy in a long run.
Are people already selling land inland and advertise it as future waterfront?
I agree that people generally don't concern themselves too much with how their information is protected. Most people simply assume that it already is or that they can't really do much about it without giving up a lot of convenience. However, I have noticed in specific cases, people do pay attention. In my case, I'm protecting contact information while sharing with others and most people think it is a great use of e2ee.
Cities Keep Building Luxury Apartments Almost No One Can Afford
Keep Zuck. I want to see fb crash and burn.
> For instance, you should be willing to forgoe libel/slander laws and allow people to smear the shit out of each other. It means people will need to figure out for themselves whom to listen to, but honestly, I don't think the situation is any different today.

Anyone who's had a conversation with someone who was relentlessly bullied should know this is how you increase suicide rates and/or mass shootings.

These are perspectives that you, personally, are comfortable with. I, however, am not. It would be unfair to advocate that myself, and many others, are subjected to what can be considered a living hell.
I look forward to the weight savings of having a smaller battery would bring.
I had to guide it a bit and manually put some things in but it came up with

"The Eiffel Tower was built because of the Great Seattle Fire of 1889. This meant that the city was rebuilt in a different way. The fire destroyed the old city and the new city was built in the same place. The tower was built to commemorate the fire. The tower is a symbol of the city"
I love how the cookie popup takes up half the screen on mobile with a button saying “I’m OK with that”
Much like a Commission for Stopping Further Improvements, a Coalition for Stopping Further Regulation is equally short-sighted.

Brunel's contention that structural engineers should be qualified to make their own decisions unencumbered by regulation makes sense on the face of it. But then, what qualifies a structural engineer? Licensing, a product of regulation.

Like many things, regulation is, in isolation, neutral. It can serve the common good, or it can serve the interests of an unrepresentative cabal; it can be forward-looking and adaptable, or it can be hastily drafted by unqualified functionaries. Why couldn’t the regulators in Brunel's day have carved out an open-ended “unless otherwise demonstrated” around the use of iron structural members?
Perhaps copyright is what being circumvented, not just GPL. What Microsoft does is take your original work, create derivative works and sell them for profit. Unless it's under creative commons zero or public domain it shouldn't be legal...
They all do. The Great Heist is ongoing and it would appear without an end in sight.
One of the things that I put some though into is that the PIO block is fast and you can build a custom fast interconnect from that (or maybe even Transputer Link) and then build a large distributed memory “supercomputer” from that.

One of the limiting factors is that RP2040 expects to boot from SPI Flash and there is no documented way for external SSRAM (the Synopsys DW IP that is used by RP2040 as SPI flash controller probably even can do that, but its documentation in RP2040 datasheet seems somewhat redacted).
Re “If you have nothing to hide” arguments. Pointing out abuses is one thing.

I say we go the other way. All travel by government employees/officials is available to the public (can be historical to avoid security issues). Complete financial transparency by all government officials/senior staff and their family members enforced at the bank level - you must list all your accounts, a cumulative amount of assets, list of specific assets >10k in value. The financial institution is responsible for providing that directly to the IRS which then removed account numbers, institution names, round values to the nearest N to avoid identity theft, etc.

The entire political apparatus in the US seems to shy away from any real transparency yet want to foist it on everyone else not in power. That’s not really living your values.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHxoM9lvzVA
Sure you can namecall, but it's childish and ugly. Please don't do it around anyone you want to continue to have a reasonable conversation with.
https://archive.is/moJ4S
“clusters” only help when you can deal with eventual consistency (which is often admittedly more than most businesses realize). Sure you can scale your read only instances.

BTW: I work in the consulting department of a little company I am sure you have heard of that knows something about dealing with “the big boys” at scale.
Kind of (if you mean the Shut Up and Dance one), in classic black mirror fashion the episode is littered with twists that make it difficult for people to really grasp the point and instead can argue against it. In the episode the main character gets infected with malware (the tool he wanted is actually a sting operation), but because of what he's being blackmailed about a lot of people feel that's justified.
I'm sure this will happen. But I think your timeline is way faster than it will happen.

I highly doubt gasoline will be hard to find in most places by 2045; I'd expect a lot fewer fueling stations, but I think even at 10% of the station count, gasoline will still be convenient and easy. And, if gasoline is less convenient, you can always use gas cans to extend your range. They're not too expensive, and not too inconvenient (epa 'anti-spill' nozzles that make it hard to fill without spilling not withstanding); long term storage is problematic, but if you're regularly using it, no big deal. Most gasoline powered vehicles have at least a 300 mile range, and it's not hard to find vehicles with a larger range.
>>Don't you see that's the way to eliminate the power of the bots

That's the sales line.

The reality is that "verification" now means nothing more than you have an email and a credit/debit with a limit more than $8, and you can claim to be anyone you want.

Within hours, scores of fake "official" govt accounts are up [0]. If you don't think that is somehow beneficial to scammers and disruptive bots, I'd like to talk to you about some great oceanfront property in Kansas!

There is also the Auschwitz Memorial @AuschwitzMuseum account being unverified while the account of a prominent Nazi propagandist is [1].

The result is that anyone running a bot/troll account can put up any face they want and purchase amplified reach (not merely speech) for $8/month - an astonishing deal

Beyond effectively destroying the value of the Blue Check verification status to convey validation, it has now turned into a badge of shame that no serious person wants. Musk already knows this, and is trying to counteract it by leaving legacy valuable badges on certain celebrities, such as Stephen King, who explicitly denies paying [2]

The Blue Check has become a toxic symbol, and this is reflected in new terms o service [3], where you cannot turn it off, even by cancelling the subscription.

The economic reality is that Twitter's core value proposition was the presence of verified and active govt accounts, news accounts, and celebrity accounts. It was their content that people came to see and interact.

By allowing anyone to pay a small fee to impersonate anyone, Musk has made verification worthless and even toxic.

It literally renders nearly worthless the very thing Musk wants people to pay for.

And, beyond doing nothing to suppress bots, this enables them as never before.

Masterful strategy there... (/s)

[0] https://twitter.com/jsrailton/status/1649146273121857554

[1] https://twitter.com/EladNehorai/status/1649262025296744450

[2] https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1649181726395052039

[3] https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1649449653098668032
> non-permissive licenses such as GPL mean that you cannot [use the code] without consent.

Huh? GPL does have strings attached, but if consent one of them?

Seems like a thinly disguised ad
I see where the confusion is coming from. Other hadiths in the same book seem to suggest this is moreso because blood itself is considered unclean. For instance:

> Sahih al-Bukhari 325 (Book 6, Hadith 30) #322

> Narrated 'Aisha: Fatima bint Abi Hubaish asked the Prophet, "I got persistent bleeding (in between the periods) and do not become clean. Shall I give up prayers?" He replied, "No, this is from a blood vessel. Give up the prayers only for the days on which you usually get the menses and then take a bath and offer your prayers".

"Assume good faith" would suggest that at the time the holy texts were written, bleeding was frequently associated with infection and disease. Germ theory came over a millenia later.
If you put in 2 weeks notice and you get fired on the spot its a slam dunk un employment claim. (assuming you can show that yes you gave notice and you weren't fired first) Most places would rather just pay you the 2 weeks if they really dont want you around than deal with unemployment. Lots of corporate environments firing people takes more than 2 weeks anyways, and you would just be creating extra work for HR for what would seem like no reason.
I wouldn't pay much for property in Florida knowing the ongoing insurance situation

https://www.pnj.com/story/news/2023/04/18/florida-insurance-...
So that they can save Worldwide Gossip and Surveillance Central Inc? Please let it burn crash and evaporate.
I think our monkey brains are not that bad on their own. Meanwhile when influenced by capitalism...
At some point we're going to have to test this - can we go work for a company and if their workers write code with the help of ai can we just use the code for ourselves as well? Since it's not copyright-able.
I'll admit I would rather this bill doesn't pass but don't care if it does to do anything about it.
> EDIT: I see you edited your comment about 'universal truth' after I answered it. I love the irony. Hail to the internet.

In case anyone wonders, I believe (heh) the comment read simply "I disagree there is no universal truth."
Big discussion 10 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35524702
Internet Archive would be a useful corpus to ingest continuously.
I believe that's UB.
Traditional ICE starter batteries are optimized for this cold-cranking power rating, but they only have to deliver this for a matter of seconds before being recharged. They are not designed to deliver this continuously nor to ever be operated at low states of charge.

Conversely, a BEV traction battery has to support a wider range of loads at any charge state between its minimum and maximum charge levels, in order to have decent driving range. Like a starter motor, the BEV is not going to sustain high power output for very long, since a car only takes seconds to accelerate to legal road speeds. After that, it requires continuous output at lower power levels to maintain a cruising speed.

Even with lead-acid batteries, there are regular starter batteries and then there are deep-cycle batteries which have far less cold cranking amps but more durability when depleted to low charge states before being recharged.

The low density of lead-acid batteries is what makes them unsuitable for mobile applications. They might have 30-50 Wh/kg while various lithium ions might be 100-300 Wh/kg. And now this announcement is talking about 500 Wh/kg so 10x the best lead-acid batteries...
You don't even need to say anything that isn't true. Just being selective about which true secrets you reveal can be a very powerful tool to control the narrative.
"Eveyone that disagrees with me is stupid and easily manipulated, not smart like me"

I think alot of people watch Fox because its currently the only news channel that provides coverage of poor Democrat behaviour. That doesnt mean they agree with everything that is said.
I had a great relationship with one of my previous companies, my boss, and team. I gave them about 8 weeks notice. It was certainly appreciated. There was no reason to blindside them, nor were they going to can me early for putting in my notice.

I know plenty of people may do this and it not be appreciated, and that just might happen. I think it's good to at least consider if you have a fairly transparent relationship with your boss.
This is why we need taboo-formation around environmentally damaging behaviors and nurture virtuous aspirations towards environmentally responsible spending.

That is, if it means riding your bike to work, or it is a shift in ostentatious spending, from e.g. square footage to bespoke furniture, keeping up with the joneses can actually be an excellent forcing function.

e.g. new england puritans were (are (?)) famously keeping up with the joneses by not buying flashy, wasteful things.

Similar mindsets - that are environmentally responsible - need to take hold (and can take hold. be that example.)
>which are sharing bus with immobilizer I suppose

I think the proposal is to, uh, not do that.
Exactly!

I was speaking ironically

As my comment noted, I am not a fan of making something its own prerequisite.
The doomsday cult approach doesn't work. People wear out very quickly from having imminent destruction that never materializes pushed on them. Whatever one's position on what we should be doing about climate change, it should be obvious that regular alarmism is not the way to get people to do stuff.
Rubbish. Why can't this idiotic meme die already?
I literally only opened this article to make sure someone made sure this got asked. Kudos.
What I doubt is that the current approach can lead to AGI at all, regardless of scale. But I'm just speculating along with everyone else. We will see.
> isn’t dependent on agreement

It is by definition. If you disagree, go write a mathematical proof that 1 = 1. There are many in the world who would love to see it.
In other news: water is wet.
What did they expect it to do, if not exactly this?
"Ars" is Latin for "art". Can be read as things like: "Art digital", "Art technical", "Art mathematical"
I believe there will be new "AI permissive licenses" that will pop up in near future. Or existing licenses to add a clause for training AI with their code.
Well, yes. That's definitely true. And I've been thinking about hacking a repurchased klacky-key keyboard into my PI400. It shouldn't be TOO hard.
interesting

> If your Agreement provides for the defense of third party claims

do any of them?

it also states:

> You retain all responsibility for Your Code, including Suggestions you include in Your Code or reference to develop
Your Code. It is entirely your decision whether to use Suggestions generated by GitHub Copilot. If you use
Suggestions, GitHub strongly recommends that you have reasonable policies and practices in place designed to
prevent the use of a Suggestion in a way that may violate the rights of others. This includes, but is not limited to,
using all filtering features available in GitHub Copilot.

(contra proferentem would apply though)
If you have a friend who celebrates Eid, try and have some Seviyaan and Sheer-Khurma at their place.
>Islam gave rights to woman at a time when they were treated as property everywhere else in the world.

false on all accounts.
yes to the second https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/23.4.0/docker-... and only after the embargo is over to the first: https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/23.4.0/LICENSE...

I also miss the "good old days" when running sentry was like 3 containers, not the 32 of modern Sentry
Yeah I mean more from a mindshare / value to your personal portfolio pov. But still, what we have today is just an approximation of Flash in 2000s
It’s still exponential, but a little slower. (edit: wait, is that still exponential if it slows down?) Anyway we only need to get to human level (or maybe a bit less) and we’re not that far off (maybe 10 or 20 years at current rates of progress?)

Not all types of AI need external training data, you can train on how effectively a goal is achieved
It’s much different. As someone who is a long time developer who also deals with the “DevOps” side of the world. I never design architectures of the former (development) without thinking about the latter from day one.

You can’t just wave your hands and throw it over to the “DevOps” folks. Doing so is kind of just the opposite of what “DevOps” is suppose to be.
We don’t. Or rather, there’s nothing more special about what it’s like to be a bat than there is about what it’s like to be a combine harvester. Qualia are just our perceptions of our perceptions.
You are not technically fired. At the company I worked for, you are immediately walked to the door and you will not be able do any more work for the company. You will get your two weeks pay.

I am not sure what happens when you try to give more than two weeks notice.
I'm curious. If you are willing to talk about it what did she use it for?
ok, now do saving/investing 5% of your salary over 10 years with those 2 numbers....
There must be ways to write regulations in meaningful ways. Like a train bridge must meet specification a, b and c and pass tests d, e and f, instead of saying it must be made of wrought iron.
Isn’t it baked into IPv6 as something that happens automatically? I’m seeing better traction with ISPs seeming to finally hand out IPv6 addresses.
Usually only enabled for server class GPUs, from what I've seen.
Wildfires aren't really the problem on a global scale. They are a bit of a pain in Australia, and US West coast sure.

The real problematic fires are currently man-made and entirely purposefully lit, i.e slash and burn agriculture. They are destroying the air and huge amounts of rainforest and jungle in places like Indonesia, Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, Myanmar, Brazil, etc.

So while I commend the effort I think the bigger problem at hand is working out how to switch these agriculture systems over to more modern techniques and prevent further destruction of perhaps irreplaceable forests.

Most wildfires are generally in fire-prone areas where fires is a frequent and necessary part of life, detecting it sooner to save lives is good, developing better back-burning techniques to reduce intensity during fire season is also good. Just not as much impact on the world as aforementioned agricultural burning.

Even though we are at the tail end of the burning season in SEA you can still see how massive the problem is from this satelite detector run by NASA: https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/map/
Sounds kinda anticompetitive to me. Guess we'll see who wants to play ball, though!
Does Codeium give attribution for code under other FOSS licenses? No?

Still infringing.

Nice try.
You can see nipples plenty of other places. Some shops used to sell porn on their magazine racks, some didn't.
the code is a reference to oracle v google
Ouch. We switched to GigaDevice GD32 last year for exactly this reason.
You're trying to frame this about college degree vs none. I'm sure that's a valid point and a college degree has value, but that's not relevant if we are talking about a degree in CS vs a degree in EE/Math/Physics. CS degree does not mean that you follow direction or work within a rigid structure any more than a degree in any other mathematical science. The Leet Code question biases the evaluation very strongly to tidbits of CS trivia that may or may not be relevant to the actual job. This will filter out someone with a background in say electrical engineering, even if the job is about doing linear algebra and signal processing (areas where EE is probably a better training than CS).
In the big picture, if we enter a world where an AI is instantly capable of doing code better than you do and without efforts, then I'm not sure why code should be copyrightable at all.

Copyright protects original works of authorship including literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works, such as poetry, novels, movies, songs, computer software, and architecture.

Copyright does not protect facts, ideas, systems, or methods of operation, although it may protect the way these things are expressed.

Here (and in the future even more), AI is totally capable of expressing one idea in any programming language if you ask for it (even if conceptually inspired by copyrighted code).

Which means that a particular expression (a specific implementation) is practically of no value or particular interest at this stage.

You could ask the AI to do a slightly different implementation, it would not be a problem for it and would require no efforts.

There is no point to protect something that can be generated using no effort and has no particular genius in it.
Their specific claims designed to be misleading but barely vague enough to not be an outright lie go farther than just marketing imho. For example: "weak PBKDF2 implementations have made other password managers vulnerable". This isn't marketing a la "we make an industry-leading product", it's insinuating that a significant portion of competitors are using insecure tech.
I meant the >20fps of continuous motion image input that would be required to drive safely in real-time.
OK, monkey paw wish granted.

Laws may now only be passed and officially discussed using their globally unique identifier like SB-47226

When politicians advocate for or against these laws in the public sphere they will still make up catchy names to make them stick in peoples heads.

Now you still get misleading names but its twice as hard to understand what bill is what.
> maybe 10 or 20 years at current rates of progress?

how can the rate be maintained?

exponential chip scaling is over, and they've parasited, sorry, trained on the entirety of accessible human knowledge

the rate may drop to zero

the exponent may even go negative once LLMs start ingesting their own hallucinations
I don't think twitter will care too much.

Their focus is on how to monetize and I think I've got it.

Musk has admitted buying some people bluetick. Why stop at him? I predict he will let anyone do it. Soon how far in advance your bluetick is paid up will be as important as your follower count.

And it will all go into Twitters pocket.
This also ignores you don't pay FICA after 160k. So the more you make, the more you take.