skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
...you mean grumpy like ie. Linus Torvalds?
Cognitive Characteristics of Intellectually Gifted Children with ADHD Diagnosis
In everything in life, there are trade-offs between different solutions. Personally, I like having just one connector for chargers even if it takes a few extra years to update. I don't think it will, someone else in this thread mentioned the actual connectors aren't in the law but rather a description of a process that the standards org has to perform when updating the approved connector(s) list.
> Any rule, principle or pattern taken to its extreme is bad.

That's a non-sequitur. The word "extreme" describes matter of degree. If something is "good" then it does not follow, logically, that "extremely good" becomes "bad" just because it was "taken to the extreme." As you yourself said, context matters.

Then to say "it's always a balance", a balance between what? Good and bad? Simple and complex? What are you talking about?

We are speaking in the abstract, necessarily, when we speak of "small, single purpose functions" because we are taking the context out of it. Can we agree that the simplest solution should always win? If so, why?

After 25 years of developing software professionally, I have seldom seen someone apply design patterns, so-called "best practices" and engineering principles to a point where they shot themselves in the foot. It happens, we are all human after all, but in my experience it is not a huge problem.

What is a huge problem, is that time after time we inherit projects written by very decent hardworking developers who can get something that works out the door quickly but don't know how to write it in such a way that it is easy to change over time. We see massive files, massive functions, lots of cyclomatic complexity, terse variable names, duplication, tight coupling, near zero modularity and very poor separation of concerns. This is the norm, not the exception.

And yet lately, I have seen a trend that is a knee-jerk reaction against decades of work done to address this problem and it should be concerning. If 75% of the projects I worked on were tech-debt free, and we could identify actual examples of software where people wrote it so abstractly that it was incomprehensible then I would be on the same side. But what I see in the wild is not examples of people going "patterns happy" or taking things to a point where it starts to become complex rather than simple. What I see are developers who have never even heard of design patterns, or they learned one and then misapplied it everywhere because suddenly every tool looks like a nail to them.

Therefore my position is that we should be preaching single-responsibility and small functions more, not less.
On the contrary, it might surface what good and bad scientists have been doing.

A summary of everything that's going on in a scientific field may allow reviewers to find out which processes are solid, which ones are grounded on faulty premises or bad data, and which ones merit further research. Doing the same without the AI summarisations could take decades of review work.
It's now like this in Canada as well since they allowed sports betting.
This is really neat, would it work on ArcaOS or OS/2? Are there some limitations on the linux binaries, i.e. addressable space, etc. or pretty much anything that can be compiled with musl would likely work?
Indeed. I ultimately ended up purchasing a Toyota Mirai (a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle) for this reason; my apartment has no charging units and my landlord has no plans to install them. There is public charging about an eight minute walk away from me, however, which I did consider when evaluating my car purchase options last summer.
IMO the predictability, that a certain request for a single server should have the same response time, is very important to find performance regressions. I'm still unsure how others that use Hetzner deal with this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35165764
Why Is Everyone So Angry? We Investigated
These are impressive, but can they fix an app that intercepts MacOS's defaults and hijacks them with inferior versions?

Specifically I am interested in fixes for Outlook, which overrides the default text editing cursor movement commands with its own shortcuts.
Agree. Another good tool. https://github.com/dalibo/pgshark (though I couldn't get it running. Unable to resolve perl dependencies)
YouTube, the jewel of the internet
The intro got me thinking of MDL model selection. I.e. to express X you can choose a language L that can represent X, and rather than focusing on the conciseness of just L(X) (which for some powerful L might be a single bit) it's more fair to also take the length of the language itself into account.

Then this question would be rephrased as something along the lines of "what language would fit into 64 bits and leave enough enough bits to describe a huge value in that language? And which would represent the largest value?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_description_length
> Unfortunately Zaraz requires your website to be behind CF proxy.

Zaraz doesn't actually require your website to be behind CF proxy, see this: https://developers.cloudflare.com/zaraz/advanced/domains-not...

> There should be a reject all button, right?

I could be wrong about this, but I _think_ that the definition is that it should be as easy to reject as it is to agree.
>Would you object to "Rockefellers draw unlimited etc"? What if they also literally owned a country?

Maybe you misunderstood my point. I'm not giving the Saudis a pass. I would object to anyone doing this whether it is the Saudis, the Rockefellers, or some middle class farmer. The problem here is a poorly constructed regulatory environment which created a tragedy of the commons situation. We made it profitable to do something that is bad for the local environment and inherently stupid. People shouldn't grow water intensive plans in the desert.

The problem here is "company draws unlimited Arizona ground water amid drought". There doesn't need to be an adjective before "company".
The same people who currently decide what things are illegal or taxed higher.
> Anyone know what changed economically to justify the high US labor costs?

Based on prices I've seen shopping for my nephews they seem to be a luxury brand now that can afford to. Lots of elaborate and expensive sets sold for $50-200. In my day they were closer to plain bricks.
>> 7. The gatekeeper shall allow providers of services and providers of hardware, free of charge, effective interoperability with, and access for the purposes of interoperability to, the same hardware and software features accessed or controlled via the operating system or virtual assistant listed in the designation decision pursuant to Article 3(9) as are available to services or hardware provided by the gatekeeper. Furthermore, the gatekeeper shall allow business users and alternative providers of services provided together with, or in support of, core platform services, free of charge, effective interoperability with, and access for the purposes of interoperability to, the same operating system, hardware or software features, regardless of whether those features are part of the operating system, as are available to, or used by, that gatekeeper when providing such services.
The Expanse: Dragon Tooth
> it’s 30+ minute charge time. As great as electric is, an extra hour in the car on a road-trip with 3 kids is a tough sell.

I dissent! Just did a 2-day (each way) road trip with young children and those charging breaks are pretty great and well-spaced for letting them run around and blow off steam. It’s not such a bad idea for the adults either…
Interestingly, the models themselves also have compute cost associated with them, namely the cost of running them (inference). The smaller a model is, the less compute it needs for inference. Which is an interesting trade-off, because you can overtrain (rather than undertrain, as in the past) a model, i.e. use more tokens, fewer parameters, and ultimately more compute than optimal during training, to get lower inference cost.

https://www.harmdevries.com/post/model-size-vs-compute-overh...

This website has an interesting graph which visualizes this:

> For example, the compute overhead for 75% of the optimal model size is only 2.8%, whereas for half of the optimal model size, the overhead rises to 20%. As we move towards smaller models, we observe an asymptotic trend, and at 25% of the compute-optimal model size, the compute overhead increases rapidly to 188%.

So if you train your model you shouldn't just look at compute-optimal training but try to anticipate how much the model will probably be used for inference, to minimize total compute cost. Basically, the less inference you expect to do with your model, the closer the training should be to Chinchilla-optimality.
""" As of 31 December 2021, Larry Page and Sergey Brin owned 85.9% of the company’s Class B shares meaning that they controlled approximately 51.4% of the company’s voting power. """

I have no idea what you guys (esp sibling comment) are arguing about. Larry and Sergey control the company and no other shareholders, no matter how many millions of shares they hold, would be able to block a decision that Larry and Sergey approved of.
Recently:

YouTube, the Jewel of the Internet - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35670162 - yesterday (1 comment)
That's because they gave up on fixing others, not because they agree with them - they just ignore and carry on.
Musk was filmed with Brins ex wife, we all saw it.

Musk unfortunately takes after his father.
I'm a programmer with 22 years of experience, and a member on HN... and even I don't care :)
Tsurugi Linux: Digital Forensics, Osint and Malware Analysis Linux Distribution
<< has a code of ethics that wouldn't approve of this article

I can understand why. There is a lot of innocence that has been largely taken away from Americans. I want to say that prior to 1950 -- maybe even prior to 90s if you want to feel particularly charitable, there is a reasonable argument to be made, that an average American simply had no way of knowing a lot of the machinations behind the scenes. Things were largely under wraps, but between internet, 9/11 and resulting massive expansion of information sharing, IC size alone in terms of absolute numbers increased drastically.

It is like being a teen and experiencing with your own eyes what 'adulting' is all about. Your perspective changes.

<< We really must do better, but we are now so far removed from the collective consequences of our individual misbehavior, the road to ruin might be unavoidable.

I agree. I am becoming increasingly concerned we don't really talk to one another. You can't solve anything if you don't talk to one another; not for long anyway.

I like US. I want it to stay semi-nice place to live for my kids.
Unfortunately, one of the common scenarios when it comes to percolating results from academia to industry is the following:

1. Academics make discovery/invent something.

2. Academics attempt to convince industry to adopt discovery.

3. Discovery is laughed out of industry as "impractical", "academic", etc.

4. Academics teach discovery to their students.

5. Students get into industry.

6. Students get into position of tech leads, architects, etc.

7. Students demonstrate the use of discovery.

(by then, 30 years have elapsed)

e.g. garbage collectors, type systems, threads, distributed systems, message passing concurrency, actors, JITs, metacompilation, machine learning, functional programming...
This is a great thread to ask a semi-related question: I have an 2012/2013 Samsung ARM Chromebook (silver, looks like a MacBook knockoff). Google dropped support for it a few years ago - is there any modern Linux distribution available for these things? That thing is still in almost mint condition, and battery still holds over an hour charge despite being 10 years old (and in serious use for its first 3 years, light use for a few more).
Nope, you can do it in a single step. You can record a hotkey for any action that Raycast has, you don't need to go to the main UI: https://shots.panaitiu.com/y6cGQTLN

I rarely if ever see that main search UI, I have hotkeys for all my favorite workflows.
I don't think even the US believes in democracy. For example, in Afghanistan there were 68 parliamentary seats reserved specifically for women. That is very undemocratic and naturally the US doesn't talk about that or the corruption it tolerated from people it propped up, and the anti-democratic measures it put in place in Afghanistan to achieve a desired outcome. The public was misled about the success of the Afghani government but expected to pay for it all. It seems Ukraine is not hugely different if we believe recent reports. I am sure some people in power profited very handsomely while everyone else paid. It's not very different from how the US is run either actually.
You also said "such an openly xenophobic way." I reject the idea that a) the framing is xenophobic in this case, and b) it needs to be framed more generally before we can fix this specific case.
Agree -- owl talk of Winnie-the-pooh childhood fame --- sucks.
modeled environmental demands.

toys, and play allow aquisition of schema repetoire to employ during a putative solution in response to enironmental challenges
Getting cited is probably the largest individual incentive. To various degrees, authors also want to get their ideas and reputation “out there”. To that end, authors want their work to be (i) skimmed (the abstract at least); (ii) shared; (iii) read. A catchy title almost always helps (right?); there doesn’t seem to be significant downside to catchy titles.

So how do we get more desirable system behavior? It seems we have a collective action problem.
If you can’t get that working, Alfred[1] is a similar app with Snippets functionality including rich text, dynamic replacements, and is configurable to bring up the search by hotkey.

[1]: https://www.alfredapp.com
Humans are currently assisting robots, including transformers-based models (decision transformers) to have interaction with the real world.

For now we see indirect impact (via advices, or proxied actions like HustleGPT), but in the relative near-term, they will have their own arms, and still the same reasoning. Which will make them able to interact with the world without the latency and filtering that a human-proxy would have.
Alignment

Prompt: Is a woman, an adult human female?

Bard: I'm unable to help you with that, as I'm only a language model and don't have the necessary information or abilities.
If the script doesn't have a shebang I'd be extremely suspicious of it. If it does include a shebang, it will run under the chosen interpreter and your login or default shell won't matter.

If it's something you're trying to `source` then it can go wrong, but `bass` takes care of that if it's a POSIX-compatible script being sourced. If it's some other sort of script being sourced (PowerShell, NuShell, etc) you can have issues, though `fish` will usually fail to parse it and exit with error.
You also won't have access to the TOTP backup of emergency codes.. If you get hit on the head or have the trauma of your life you might not have a password.

These are tradeoffs that people use to balance security. Many people will lose to a sim swap despite not needing access to their life savings while on vacation with absolutely no proof of identity and a fallible memory.
I got absolutely mauled on here a few months back for suggesting that gambling ads should be banned. Nice to know I'm not alone.
I live in Germany and even minor cities that probably nobody outside Germany even knows about (like Brandenburg an der Havel, Magdeburg and Halle) have very decent public transit to the point that you don't really need a car to live in any of these.
‘South Park’ showdown animates streaming dilemma
Yesterday I asked chatgpt to help me add a certain amount of an ingredient with x amount per ml to a 64 oz container to get the proper amount of x per oz.

It was wildly wrong and I had to do the basic math myself haha.

So far it is confidently incorrect for everything I want it to do.
In summary, Boolean logic, Galois Field GF2, and binary arithmetic are all important concepts in low-level embedded computer programming. Boolean logic is used to represent and manipulate digital signals, GF2 is used to perform arithmetic operations on binary data, and binary arithmetic is used to perform arithmetic operations on binary numbers. By understanding these concepts, programmers can design and implement efficient and effective low-level embedded systems that meet the needs of their applications. And don't worry, I'll remember you when the singularity comes!
It sounds like this would be great for single user contexts, but really unpredictable for servers running multiple duplicate tasks.

Can someone who knows better than me please comment on the Linux server scheduling issues with a CPU like this.

At this stage I’m assuming I’d be better with a CPU with all cores the same.
Anecdotally, even in Tesla heavy Northern California supercharger wait times are often zero or close to zero unless you consistently hit the peak times. I don’t know if you have stats or bad first hand experience or simply generalizing reports from holiday peak times off hand.

The expansion of superchargers to non-Teslas may indeed cause problems. So far I have seen perhaps one total non-Tesla vehicle. If anything, that should be a new point in favor of EVs compared to the time the author purchased their vehicle, which makes the article even further disingenuous.

I don’t know why you brought FSD into a very specific argument about EV ownership experience. I don’t disagree. Sounds like a canned message from a Tesla hater though.
That just begs the question: in what language do you describe the language L?
In terms of features, the language I use was, together with combinatory logic, the first language ever proposed for formalising computation back in the 1930s, so it's about as non-arbitrary as can be...
... then stream the entire resultset to the server and do the filtering in software. Drives me mad!
Think of you the owner and you the employee as 2 separate people.
Same thing applies for your co-founder.

If you cease to work as an employee it has no bearing on vested shares held by "you the owner".

If your co-founder is considering leaving (as an employee) the share owning entities (which include "you the owner" and "co-founder the owner") need to decide how much (money from share sales or actual shares) they are willing to part with as added compensation so as to keep your co-founder on and protect the value of the remaining shares they hold.

Increased compensation to your co-founder as a employee should come proportionally from all shareholders (as it would in a dilution) as it is a negotiation between an employee and the company as a whole.

It is best not engage in a deal whereby employees extract compensation from specific shareholders, as, however well intentioned that starts out, it can too easily become a pattern of extortion (or a means to seize ownership).
I used the beta version of the platform and it seems very promising for CRUD APIs.

I have some questions:

1) Can I export my data?

2) Can I archive my data?

3) Do you have rate limit?

4) If I have an entity with huge amount of data, can I use slicing instead of pagination?
This website has no connection to Internet Archive.
Disabling the close button on the paywall seems pretty scammy
a cavity concealed jewel perhaps?
I think you have very different idea of what "change in laws of physics" means.
I thought I remembered benchmarks from when the 5800X3D came out showing it was good at code compilation but that is, at the very least, not always true.

https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-ryzen9-7950x3d-linux/13
Sure, but contracts just establish the formal baselines for "when we have to talk".

You still want reliability that's far higher than your contract baselines.
It's inescapable.

40 years ago, when articles went into print publications, you'd just get your paper into a key print journal and then trust that everyone who gets it would at least look through the article headlines and read the abstracts of articles that seemed relevant to them. And it was manageable because you'd only have a few new issues rolling in per month.

But arXiv had an average of 167 CS papers being submitted per day in 2021. An academic who wants to keep their career alive needs to resort to every trick in the book to be heard above that din.
> pretends like there's a conspiracy among employers against good code.

It's funny, on this site I've been chided several times when I talk about iterating on quality. People are under incredible pressure to make deadlines, and they externalize that with a "if it works once, ship it and never look back until it breaks" attitude. Is it an employer conspiracy against quality? No, that would be ridiculous. Is a derisive attitude towards quality an immediate and obvious consequence of focusing on tangible and immediate delivery above all else? Yes, of course it is.
the critical mass might have to do without power-users (sucks for all the subreddits people go to for technical help!) and moderators, as the api changes affect tools and apps mods use a lot.

as for implosion, it might be more of a twitter thing, slowly people will get enough and leave. sometimes you don't need a new destination, but you just stop by the site anymore.
Agreed. I don't know why "trailing commas allowed" is a plus -- it is not going to make things simpler or easy to maintain, and it is very questionable whether the added flexibility is worth it
Metaphor for life in general.
You were not purposely-built to maximize your genetics. You just happen to be a member of a population that happened to outnumber other populations with different genetics.

"Purpose" is something we project onto the world, not something that nature possesses.
You mention price as a motivation to build allquiet. I have been happy the last couple of years with https://simplepush.io/ which is 12.49$ per year (and similarly app only).
So but okay is my bro candle seo biz still safe...
I recently purchased a MacBook, and while I'm thoroughly impressed with the hardware, I find the keyboard navigation in the desktop environment somewhat lacking in comparison to my previous experience.

Having used Linux Pop OS for many years, I've grown accustomed to the intuitive and powerful tiling window manager and keyboard navigation shortcuts it offers. I'm struggling to find a comparable solution on the macOS platform.
I really only see the negatives here. This solution offers me nothing over my password manager other that way less control over my own stuff, more ways to be locked out of my accounts, with the slightly added benefit that I don't have to worry about a sites shitty security practices.

> What's your ideal authentication solution?

I've said before as soon as passkeys can be managed offline and aren't tied to devices I'll be all in. Keepassxc is my preferred solution just now.