skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You said fuzzing and exercising error conditions. Rust's tooling does not do that. You need something to generate those tests.

Fuzzing is still not part of the default Rust tooling.
Have you heard of "non-sponsored influencers"? They're your average person who starts creating videos shilling brands, for free, in the hope that they'll get picked up for a real endorsement deal.

You may know one of the ones that made it for real, but I see a lot of delusional hopefuls simply copying what the others are doing and hoping to strike it rich.
Too little too late. Everyone I know has moved to 1password or authy or yubikeys (or some combination).

I'll never understand why they didn't do this many years ago.
. . . said the AI.
As a former Google Auth user, who bungled my own phone migration a few years ago - yeah, defense in depth is better but at the time, I was furious there was no way to recover my Google Auth and I had to go to every single service and reset my 2FA.

Storing both on 1Pass is not as secure, but the option is that once in a while you misstep and spend a week restoring TOTP setup (or lose entire accounts because your service provider has no functional customer support) then I'm amenable to stable but less secure options.
It's interesting to see some movement in this area. Is Google finally feeling some competition? I was looking for this feature years ago and had to switch to Authy and then to 1P. I'm wondering how many users did GA loose for not adding this basic functionality for years.
The "Join the Mailing List" link on the home page is dead now btw.
Combining Bash Pipes and ChatGPT to do horrifying AI things
However, a human can use animals or AIs (or anything they want) as a tool in their human created work.
San Francisco Target puts entire inventory on lockdown amid shoplifting crisis
Makes the entire article a glorified anecdote, IMHO.
Just copy-paste GDPR, and enforce it.
TOTP seed migrations are a real pain. Its good to see Google offering a solution to that problem.

I've moved to using the pass otp extension[0] which gives me secure storage of the totp seeds without being tied to a single device.

[0]: https://github.com/tadfisher/pass-otp
A 1% failure rate would be huge. That's 1 out of every 100 customers. No rational carrier would tolerate that.

I know we all hate telcos and mobile phone carriers -- and a lot of their mistrust is quite frankly deserved -- but this seems like an edge case that most customers won't even run into. First they need to switch devices, which eliminates most customers, and then second, they need to experience some kind of failure on switch. If the failure rate is any higher than before, I would be surprised. But let's wait to see the data before we all go up in arms.
> You can spot it by the very verbose answers that don't say anything meaningful.

I've been doing that online for years! Does this mean ChatGPT be taking my hobby away?
Local License Key Verification
Could you elaborate? I feel like I’m missing something significant. I am imagining people file out, then file back in a few hours later, which seems harmless-ish.
How is this different than Secure Scuttlebutt? I remember following that for a while. Dominic Tarr invented that.

Also Dat / Hypercore from Matthias Mullie, powering Beaker Browser
But you can put them in places in your home where it's not practical or aesthetic to run cabling to plug them in (e.g. fireplace mantel or hung up on a wall) and have a battery life that is measured in weeks or months rather than days.

You'd be right about the superior picture quality, though, but as the common use would be family photos that you see in passing to make you smile and may be quick snaps, the quality of e-ink is likely to be enough when it's a quick photo of your loved ones.
Well... there is the gender discrimination case against him that's currently going through the courts.

But main-stream Republicans tend to like abusive men, so he's likely to only get more popular. At least with republicans.
As a crypto-skeptic (lol), I really like Nostr. Unfortunately, I don't think it will catch on until someone takes the time to shave off the sharp technical edges and figure out spam + identity verification. The current Nostr network is full of cult-like bitcoin cryptobros, racist Twitter/Fediverse refugees, and spam. Lots, and lots of spam. But the technology is cool af and could be made into something more.
Thank you!

Re. a), b); I will probably add a "spread operator" syntax or something for collections. Maybe different symbols for the different types. Once I start prototyping I'll choose whatever is the least burden on the user (both in learning, comprehension, and in practice).

Re. different shells, I have yet to experiment - simple as! When I write the code I'll spot the challenges. Obviously I'd like it to support everything, but I have no clue as to what the implications would be.
Sounds like my e-book: "How to Create a Dropshipping video course". Buy now! /s
Show HN: A self-completing To-Do list
Yup. The catch is, it's kind of buried in System Settings.

Cable Sasser wrote a blog post that was making the rounds a few weeks ago, advocating for a dedicated app. He's right, the existing Apple implementation works great but it's still a lot for normies.

https://cabel.com/2023/03/27/apple-passwords-deserve-an-app/
I have come to believe that the desires of the satellite constellation providers will always trump that of the scientists. There is no money in astronomy and we have decided that money is more important than science in this case. We will need to build telescopes that live above LEO from now on. This means much higher costs and harder operational environments, but i don't see any other solution.

You can't just "paint them black" because the satellite is still there and will show up in the images.
If the generated text is mostly correct most of the time, people are just going to stop reviewing it because it's cheaper for them to waste someone else's time than it is to spend their own. Even those that are more diligent are bound to let things slip through the cracks because it's easy to lose concentration in a repeated, monotonous process. When everyone is doing it, it's not really a problem with a particular individual anymore.
The author of that article is a professor of archaeology who seems to hedge their language throughout. What speculative claims are presented as fact?
Military equipment can't be used to pay for domain registration, only for soft drinks. (For reference, look into Soviet arms dealings with Pepsi during the Cola Wars)
> Most visitors aren’t as sensitive to annoyances as a lot of the people in these comments.

Why on earth should I want to subscribe to a newsletter from a site I've never visited before, which I'm visiting for the first time in my life because an article from it trended on HN?

I know nothing about the quality of the site, neither about the type of regular content of the site. I don't even know if I'm going to find it useful what I'm about to read.

Imagine entering a store and the first thing they do is ask you if you want to give them your phone number so the can keep you informed.

How can you call this sensitive if you view if from this perspective?
I bought one for India. My parents don't have a wifi but they have a smart phone with a data plan. Hoping they will be able to enable access point on their phone to sync photos.
> Amazon could take your report then actually open the product and see if the incentive card is actually stored with every product. But that's a bigger task than just trusting the proof you sent in.
and face 2 face discussion forums.

like face the nation etc debates.
To all the countries crying about ageing population and birth rate decline, here is your answer. Open your gates to these wretched refuse from teeming shores. The poor, homeless, huddled masses yearning to make an earning.
> if you don't know, and you're talking to a layman audience, don't say you know. don't pretend you know, don't even present guesses, even when they are framed as guesses, because people will hear you saying you know.

> "we think [educated guess] but we don't know" is the only acceptable phrasing, to me.

I understand that it's irresponsible to communicate a greater degree of confidence than is supported by the evidence, but I'm saying that it can also be irresponsible to communicate a lesser degree of confidence than is supported by the evidence.

Consider, for example, the statement "vaccines don't cause autism". There is absolutely no evidence that vaccines cause autism (and if you want to argue that, go elsewhere--I'm not going to argue with assholes). Saying "we think vaccines don't cause autism, but we don't know" is irresponsible, because you have people saying, "Vaccines cause autism! I'm 100% sure!" A layman audience, hearing both people, hears that one isn't sure, and the other one is absolutely sure, and so they believe the absolutely sure one. The result is unvaccinated kids, the revitalization of nearly-extinct diseases, and widespread human death and suffering.

Pedantically using words that, by their dictionary definition, mean a certain thing, doesn't result in quality communication. If you say words that pedantically mean the truth, but fail to produce the true belief in the minds of your audience, you've failed to communicate. That's not entirely your fault--some of the responsibility for communication rests on the listener--but if you can improve your chances of communicating the truth by speaking with confidence that is supported by the evidence, it is your right and perhaps even obligation to do so.

> Remember this: science can never tell you when your hypothesis is correct. science can only ever tell you when your hypothesis is wrong.

This is trivially wrong:

Let's say your hypothesis is "vaccines cause autism". According to what you just said, we can't prove that hypothesis correct, we can only prove it wrong.

So let's say we've proven wrong the hypothesis, "vaccines cause autism". Now consider the hypothesis "vaccines don't cause autism". Haven't you just proven that hypothesis correct?

> I think the entire world has forgotten this.

Don't you mean "I think the entire world has forgotten this, but I don't know"? /s

Cut the melodrama. You're not so special that you have some unique or even rare knowledge that everyone else has forgotten. Lots of people know a hell of a lot more about science than either you or I do.

The Feynman video you linked doesn't load the video for me.
> What you wrote suggested that one can only attain a moderate capability without in-person mentoring from experts.

Like I said, it's hard to frame "you don't have this life experience yet" in any other way. I did use these words:

> this will only take you from absolute noob to moderately competent junior

...in reference to learning stuff online. I stand by that, because even if you are fully remote for your entire career, you're going to need some level of mentoring to level up. That's just a fact. Reductio ad absurdum: suggesting that you can become John Carmack or Jeff Dean by reading Stack Overflow.

But I also explicitly put an edit on the end of it where I disclaim the generalization you're making -- before you made your comment.
The persons reaction doesn't negate any problem with the managers behavior.

For what it's worth, I don't think there's a shortage of malice, passive aggressive, instigating behaviors that occur in the workplace that can lead up to a such reaction.
Eh, it's still better than not having it. Which is likely the bar for a lot of casual users. Mostly the goal is to prevent password reuse I think, which comes down to convenience. And unless 1pass gets hacked (which could happen! see: LastPass) it's relatively secure for that purpose.
Vue.js – Official Certification Program
Find alternatives of Auth0 for SSO with their features, pricing, pros and cons and make a decision wisely.
S. Sider behind 1K blooming tulips: ‘Artist who foretells the revolution’
Didn’t Apple rewrite the Bluetooth stack in Monterey? That’s where a slew of issues started popping up for people.

Connecting to a device with a code is still completely broken.
That’s pretty subjective to the person. Some folks are very happy working on something that may be perceived as useless but gets to retire at a really young age.
I thought Low Content Books were more like journals and the like using on-demand printing.
The Century of Self is a BBC documentary about Bernays and his propaganda models. It's quite good and available on yt.
FTA there seem to be at least 2 problems:

"the Pi has problems with cache coherency on the PCI Express bus beyond 32-bits. And many (well, all nowadays) of the drivers expect that to function."

Yeah, that's a problem.

"there were issues with the BAR (Base Address Register) space allocated on the Pi's OS."

From the GitHub link:

# The default BAR address space available on the CM4 may be too small to allow
# some devices to initialize correctly. To avoid 'failed to assign memory'

These don't look like implementation quirks, they are just flat-out errors.
Try pricing a 3 year OEM same day replacement warranty for any memory product in your country.
You have the right to be as ignorant as you want.
I started my career in my early 20s at a junior-unfriendly office. Senior guy next to me literally bought some noise-cancelling headphones to avoid talking to people. I hated that place.

Getting a 100% remote job is still the best decision I've made in my career. It has allowed me to make way above market average money and work with incredible professionals from all over the world, despite living in a country with a mediocre IT market.
> most documentation are behind a paywall

this may have been, but is not true
Logitech mouse drivers have always been bad ever since the haxie days
Anything Jack is involved in is tainted for me until further notice. I wouldn't even dare to touch any of his new platforms, seeing his connections with Elon and how his judgement failed so spectacularly with the Twitter deal - it's not worth it, just to be sold out again when he gets bored of it or it doesn't end up being a business. At least he admitted to it.

I'm not saying Mastodon is the solution, but at least no one can take it away from me at a whim or has full control over the protocol and the app.
GDPR doesn't work as described and companies have found many ways to make the process difficult. There is a clause (last case scenario) where the company can say that the data is critical to the system and can't delete it.
I think there's a valid argument for the premise because office and remote environments are very different and people default to working like they're in an office, but this piece reads like shit.

> At least 10 times a day, Erika Becker, who works as a sales development manager at a technology company called Verkada, turns to her boss with questions. “Did I handle that correctly?” she asks. “What could I have done better?”

All I could think when I read this first paragraph is, "she sounds incompetent". Feedback 10x a day makes zero sense once you have basic competence. You need much longer feedback loops for more complex and important skills.

Feedback is guidance. If you need guidance 10x a day...

30m once a week is a lot of time for feedback (Perhaps too much) if you're smart about using the time, and it's way more useful than 10x a day.
Bed Bath Moves into the Beyond
Reducing brake pad wear seems like premature optimization to me. Good pads can last well north of 50k miles, with some claiming 100k. They're also dirt cheap. I haven't changed pads in almost 5 years and my brakes don't squeak yet.
Managing remote workers is a skill that many managers are finding out they don't have right now. I wasn't in the same office as my manager when I started out. I was lucky to have good managers over time who were able to foster these types of discussions you're talking about, without ever being collocated with everyone involved.

It's kinda sad, because this isn't a new problem. Whether you're remote because you're working from home, or you're remote because you're in Belgium and the rest of your team is in North Carolina, the managerial issues are roughly the same, but we've had multinational companies for a while now...
You're describing the top-half and bottom-half driver model that's been part of Unix since forever. Indeed, bottom-half code can't sleep or block in any way, and that's a problem even in single-CPU systems like the ones Unix grew up on. There's ways to deal with this other than lockless data structures, though lockless data structures help, naturally.

The reason lockless data structures are popular is performance and scalability, and they're popular in user-land as much as in kernel-land, and in the Linux kernel as much as in any other OS.

The idea is to make sure that you don't block because context switches are expensive, but also not to spin for a long time either because that can be even worse than blocking. Along the way you want to make sure that contention is not a problem and that the algorithm scales to many CPUs and lots of racing, and that it's free of race condition bugs.
The guy who was trying to trash ChatGPT (gpt4) forgot that anyone can just check his example and post a screenshot I think.
Richard David Precht is a poor caricature of a French public intellectual figure and loves to create outrage to stay relevant. He lives off the same mainstream media that he criticizes.
This was over 10 years ago in North Dakota.
> Interesting how our leaders see their role not as representing our interests, but in shaping our interests.

Not in shaping our interests, but the interests of the 'deplorables', the people who disagree and who they see as beneath them.
From the senate press release,

> The CPPA would create a simple way for Californians to direct all data brokers to delete their personal information, free of charge.

I wonder how something like this would actually be enforced. At the moment I can request my personal information to be deleted, but there is no way for me to determine whether such request was actually fulfilled. Even with this option to direct "all data brokers", the problem remains, and it seems to be briefly acknowledged in this sentence

> Tsukayama said that what most experts in the field agree on is that California law leads the nation in this space, but that it’s still barely enforced.

I don't know of any good way to enforce this kind of legislation, even if I totally support it.
China disowns ambassador's remarks questioning Ukrainian independence
ZGC relies on the space of 64-bit pointer (and the size of the 64-bit virtual address space) for its pointer coloring algorithm, and so it is by definition incompatible with UseCompressedOops even at small sizes.

I suppose it's possible to fix this with a change to the design in some way. But if you have a heap smaller than 32GB, the existing G1 would probably work well too. ZGC shines much more on very large heap sizes since that's where long tail GC latency often hits hardest.
You forgot anyone can just run your example in ChatGPT and post a screenshot showing you're talking out of your ass.
I thought quantum tunneling was due to uncertainty, allowing the position of a particle to resolve on the other side of a barrier sometimes because it is undefined before the tunneling.

Are we talking about different things? Is one of us way off the mark? Or are these two angles of the same phenomenon?
Furthermore the risk exposure to using TOTO in 1pw is almost insignificant. You can configure your 1password account to require 2FA when setting up new devices, and unlike Google here the decryption requires manual knowledge not shared with the cloud.

The only argument I can imagine is that if someone gets ahold of your phone it's either locked and they can unlock it or it's unlocked, in which case either your 1pw account and/or other TOTP apps are either locked or unlocked. In the worst case scenario where everything is unlocked, having a separate app is negligible.

Besides, AFAIK Google Authenticator doesn't require additional unlock steps, unlike authy or 1password.

You're better off worrying about how to avoid TOTP and securing 1password than about having TOTP codes stored alongside your passwords.
sunburn; walking through brush; insects
This. For me a TOTP app/tool will only ever output codes. If it offers to let me do anything else with the key, it's a no-go.
NEWSFLASH: Having more than one hobby is possible!

Film at 11.
stop spamming please
Whoa... DMT must be cheap and available this month.
Apigee – Announcing API abuse detection powered by machine learning
But the trick is that the badge also gives you preferential positioning in replies and search, so that for dedicated hobbyist trolls, it allows their comments to bubble to the top. And the worst reply-guys on twitter love this.

As a result, viewing the replies of any moderately progressive tweeter yields a heap of blue-check abuse as the first glance.

So basically, the twitter stereotype of "Hello my name is firstname bunchanumbes and I have some really shitty opinions" is now bluecheck-boosted.
If someone wants to block certain sites there are client-based solutions that people can set up themselves and proxies they can use if they really want to depend on someone else to decide what they should be allowed to see. There's no need for it at the ISP level. At the very least it should be opt in, but something you have to ask to have removed.
Found ChatGPT.
There are hundreds if not thousands of people doing this exact hustle. You'll be spending a lot of time trying to decapitate that hydra.
Classical mechanics are fundamentally wrong. They are low energy approximations to reality. "How did the bal go through the hill when it actually didn't have the momentum to do so" is a nonsense question because the equations of motion you are attempting to use to describe the phenomena are wrong.

You can't and shouldn't try to understand QM from a CM standpoint. If you remember Taylor series expansions, this is like trying to understand `sin(x)` by looking at it's first order Taylor series expansion `x`. Your question about momentum and a potential hill is the same question as "how did the value of sin(x) start decreasing if `x` is linear?" You're using too few terms of the series expansion. The mechanisms of Newton's laws are first order terms of a proper QM solution.
The original question was about how various "investigative bodies" get their information. My problem with them is that they are marketing themselves as private citizens using widely available data while it's often not true. RT is transparent about its funding and sources at least

Bellingcat's investigation on Navalny's poisoning was entertaining as hell and I enjoyed it a lot, and I am not accusing them on lying in their reports. However they funded by National Endowment for Democracy which is CIA in disguise

https://thegrayzone.com/2021/02/20/reuters-bbc-uk-foreign-of...
Really excited to see this after first learning about NWNs two years back. Great to see progress on these new 'hardware' techniques for AI. Well done to Alon & the team!
can't answer that, but am curious to see the output of "kextstat | grep -v com.apple"
1979 12 yr old demos Apple IIe at Computerland
Is this the same way Google Podcasts works, where I "have to" have "web, location, and usage history tracking" enabled to subscribe to a podcast? lol
>The messaging needs to be fixed

The present messaging accurately reflects how managers are seeing the situation (they think employees goof off when they aren't being watched, and don't have the metrics necessary to tell that's not true), replacing it with "messaging" about career development is essentially lying just to get people to go along with RTO. If they really cared about young professionals that wouldn't be "changing the messaging."
I agree. Not to mention Farsi has some of the most beautiful proverbs.
It is pretty great and I use it daily, but there are some questionable things... Like how we can't Alt+Space+N to minimize a window anymore. That has been a hotkey on every Windows and Linux OS since forever.