skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, proponents of the capital punishment attempt to create process that attempts to mitigate complaints made by abolishionists.

Nice attempt at shifting the goalposts and shifting blame. And making a false equivalence with nuclear power.

Abolishionists want capital punishment abolished because capital punishment is inhumane, cruel, and morally objectionable.
And it will give you some random number with maybe the right order of magnitude. Doesn't seem to do arithmetic very fine at all actually.
On Android:

Open the Settings app.
Tap Sounds & vibration.
Tap More settings.
Tap Wireless Emergency Alerts.
Toggle off 'Allow alerts'

Though on Android 12 it seems to be:

Settings
Notifications
Wireless Emergency Alerts
Allow Alerts

I could be wrong but I think this will also disable environmental alerts such as tornados, avalanche risks, nuclear plant meltdown, snow squalls, incoming missiles Hawaiians got that one, space portals from evil dimensions, etc...
Off the top of my head (and IANAL):

1. Copyright laws

2. Data protection/privacy laws e.g. national implementations of GDPR, medical privacy laws
Unconscious is far too generous a term and already loaded with implication at the possibility of consciousness (given that consciousness arose from a unconscious substrate).

LLMs can be (at best) considered intellectual zombies until proven otherwise.
Isn’t ecosia just a frontend to Google ?
that's not exactly steel manning what i said, a lot of the modern lgbt craze is crossing religious boundaries, i don't want my kids to be taught anyone else's religion, i'm supposed to have this right granted to me and my kids under law

people who like what's going on in florida will move to florida, its a win-win
Not terribly good, yet: searched for “Canada”, first story was about new ant fossils, second about storms sweeping US and Canada, the next several were about Dominion and Fox.

So two “meh” and many “wtf”. Refinements remain to be made.
> I think you can argue that in both cases continued servitude is the only way either of them can get food and a place to sleep indoors.

No you can’t argue that because it’s stupid. A typical google software engineer will have made enough that in their early 30s they can quit/retire and live the rest of their life at at least the same standard of living as that cleaning lady (almost none of them find that an acceptable standard but that’s far beyond food and a place to sleep)

These are not similar circumstances by any means.
I meant pale eye colors, not skin colors, edited it.
It's the avoirdupois ounce (exactly 28.349523125 g) for everything but precious metals, where the Troy ounce is used (exactly 31.1034768 g).
> "Back in the time" I would've used email for that

One thing I like about chat is the different mindset and granularity. I can have a bot post a message to a channel for normal messages and then tag me, thus giving me a notification, for urgent matters. Email is more like digital mail, I don't want to have to check it often (I disable email notifications).
Not language but rather physiology. Don't you sympathize the birds which are annoyed by our flickering displays?
We keep a gun behind every blade of grass for a reason.
Would you be willing to say a few words about the nature of your use cases?
Was well not the most critical part, though.
I meant cleaning up the scanlines to make it easier to sample the pixel colors.

After running a Fourier transform you only need to paint over the obvious bright spots to remove these regular artefacts (see the linked article for a demonstration).
For me, Google Photos started a bit earlier: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picasa
Your example of Hare suggests Intel was sleeping. I don't think they were.

And no, TSMC is staying steady no matter what. That's how they've been operating from the start - regardless of if the "opponent" is making mistakes. It's not a strategy in that sense where they're competing. They're doing their own thing and the competitors either died by themselves or failed.

They're not competitive as in they aren't competing with Intel. Otherwise they'd go for counter measures or what not. That's never been their strategy. Cutting edge wasn't their core business originally.
I get what you want but that's NOT HOW LAW WORKS or should work.

You don't get to declare something is bad first without reasoning your way through it through a tested system like law. That's more or less anti Constitutional / American etc.
(Source: Sell on Amazon, understand their processes)

There are several potential explanations for what’s going on here. These are the most likely (imo):

1. Customers are engaging in return fraud where they “return” an expensive item for a refund, but send back a different, cheaper item. Amazon’s warehouse personnel don’t catch it and then the cheaper item ends up in inventory as the more expensive item, which then gets shipped out to a different customer.

2. 3rd party sellers are engaging in fraud by sending in cheaper inventory and claiming it is actually more expensive items. Customers then receive the cheaper items when they order the more expensive item.

The way to avoid this is to buy items that are “shipped from and sold by” Amazon or the manufacturer.

Everyone gives Amazon a hard time, but in our experience, they are usually pretty good about doing the right thing for customers. They’re actually trying to solve a hard problem at scale (be a universal marketplace that delivers in 1-2 days). They make mistakes, but imo actually do a pretty good job.
Yes, but precisely because of that there is a bit of resistance to people using that operation on large files, so it is not a common thing. It wasn't that long ago that rewriting a 10GB file from top to bottom could easily take over three minutes (50MB/s write speeds to a spinning rust hard drive = 200 seconds, and if we account for also reading the file it will be even slower), so people tend to learn to program without asking for that operation.

While there are many people who weirdly (to me at least) grotesquely overestimate the value of deduplication, it is legitimately useful because we tend not to want to completely rewrite large files very often like that, so even modifications to that file are very likely to either be appends or modifications of something in the middle without shifting the entire file.
> It performs poorly when it comes to their own brands.

Huawei arguably designed/produced the best flagship Android smartphones a few years ago, before it got hit by sanctions. Huawei did extremely well in Europe, becoming the largest smartphone brand for a brief time, until US sanctions crippled them (by removing access to Google services, and thus the entire Android ecosystem people use in the West).
Then you are going to need my app Dr. DevNull. It keeps your /dev/null clean and tuned for high performance writes. Only $5/mo. Upgrade to Dr. DevNull Pro to keep backups of everything written to /dev/null. Dr. DevNull Enterprise has all that plus SSO.
Study: In less than 6 months, hate speech has significantly increased on Twitter
> But i was curious so i looked at the “mumbo-jumbo” myself and turns out it’s actually just technical stuff and not even that difficult.

I don't see how this refutes anything above. Just because it is technical doesn't mean it isn't a gambling den and that it isn't being used to fleece suckers.
> Is it to upvote interesting titles, so we can discuss certain topics? Or to upvote interesting content?

Why not both? If I see something on the top of HN, I know it's probably worth checking out, and I read the comments first.
My coffee maker has made me coffee thousands of times, it must understand coffee!
Why? How does training a neural network violate copyright law? Which paragraph?

Same question for "data protection/privacy".
I just had an issue where I needed a human to talk to this weekend after purchasing a New Condition item and receiving a Renewed item. I spent 10 minutes trying to find it on my own, eventually just having to use Google to find the magic spell to talk to a human.

Visit Contact Us -> Select 'Something Else' -> Select 'I need more help'

This was the only way to get the help I needed, and I cant even be mad since the refund was given to me instantly and I got to keep the Amazon renewed item without having to return it.
I meant "respective individuals" in the sense, it's lastly humans being responsible for the written piece of news.

I find it very curious you would single out "The Guardian" of all publications. That organ is maybe the most independent one you will find today. It is owned by "The Scott Trust Limited", successor of the similarly named trust created to shield it from commercial interests.

Calling it a "commercial news source", as if it was the same as Murdoch's ilk, is an absurd take, even derogatory.
Do you say that, because it is "centre-left"? What right-leaning source would you call "unbiased"?
Why even write 2IC if you then have to explain what it is?
Ya this analogy really clicked with me. To really torture the analogy, Apple or any other TSMC customers hands them an .obj of their chip, and TSMC acts as the slicer and converts that into the GCode that ASML’s “printers” understand. And just like how some slicers have better overhang and infill algorithms TSMC has their own secret sauce for telling the ASML machines what to “print”.

Does that expansion of the analogy work or did I just move the analogy further from the truth?
And do you have sources for that? Sounds like something incredibly cultural that you're presenting as biological fact.
duckdb-wasm could also be an option

https://duckdb.org/2021/10/29/duckdb-wasm.html
But no; we're a default "freedom" kind of place.

You don't get to summarily declare crypto verboten and make crypto prove it's okay -- the burden is on crypto's detractors to show specifically why it's bad.
Google may indeed have the research knowledge that surpasses everyone one in the industry - but they have very little to show in terms of using that knowledge to build actual products. For example - Google home, which does a far better job at voice recognition and understanding context than Amazon’s Alexa. Yet, GH still lags far behind Amazon.
I’m skeptical of this point. Growing up Baptist, I was taught that temptation itself is not a sin because Christ was sinless and he was tempted in the desert by the devil.
Maybe I'm just blinded by experience but I don't have an issue distinguishing bad and good bots in common usage. I play Old School Runescape which is plagued with bots, but there's never confusion because linguistic markers naturally signal what is meant. The opposite has also been true in my experience. Maybe I'm just too wary of another stint on the euphemism treadmill.
Ecocide and incitement to suicide to be added to Belgian penal code
Also speaking from utter naivety, this seems like a super good idea. Each submarine gets a little attendant constellation of drones. Control them with Bluetooth. Or usb cables.

Or whiskers! That's how cats and catfish do it. A dozen 300' plastic prongs protruding frontward.

Or, to combine the two : TENTACLES!
Not necessarily; a reasonable argument is "it's just another commodity that can change in value." Someone can introduce Pokemon cards and they can change value just fine.
As the cofounder of a streaming service with a 4-letter all-caps name that was misspelled 80% of the time in media coverage, I feel their pain.

But also, they can pry my legos from my cold dead hands.
The Computing Platform Underlying AI [audio]
Using templates in Terraform to document a deployment
In your view, does that include monkeys, dogs, spiders, and even plants?
> The way to avoid this is to buy items that are “shipped from” and “sold by” Amazon or the manufacturer.

Thanks to comingling, this is not a cure-all. Amazon will store all the e.g. canon cameras from themselves and third party shippers in a single area in their warehouse, and just deduct 1 from the inventory of the one who made the sale.
Media outlets in the post-2016 landscape sang a clarion song: The unrestricted, unmoderated nature of viral content on Facebook is a social hazard, and the world will come to an end unless Zuckerberg stops his users from reading and engaging with so much unapproved information. Then they got their wish—Facebook changed the feed to prioritize content from friends and family and punish offsite news links, and that was that.

like reason dot com?
Search located Pathfinder without problems[0]. But not the Ares III landing site[1]...

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Pathfinder
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Martian_(film)
>Things change naturally

That's a statement so empty as to not even exist.

The worst attrocities and bad developments happened "naturally" too. Climate change also occured naturally (since in your use, naturally includes the acts of societies and people).

We definitely should not allow things to just "naturally happen". We should steer things towards a better future, and be able to see which "naturally ocurring" developments are good, and which are bad.
Hate Nestle? Download the app Boycott.

https://www.reddit.com/r/FuckNestle/comments/ihk2ul/hate_nes...
I'm guessing that undiverted flame and related debris could ricochet up to the rocket and cause problems.
>Blue eyes tends to make people seem more attractive and the evolutionary reason is that they end up being a good quality in a mate because it's easier to see pupil dilation. Thus making it easier to perceive their emotional states better than of someone with black/brown eyes.

I'm sure there are evolutionary disadvantages to not being able to hide your emotional states.

also the attractiveness of the color is probably taught and culturally defined.
Like a Medusa. Submarines would get scarier.
Think of it more as "prompt-fu", akin to "google-fu"--or how to google. You do have to know how to talk to an LLM, and it will be important. But it's not so much engineering, as we come to think of it in software traditionally. I wouldn't get hung up on the name, but just see it for what it is--a bad name for something we'll need to learn to be effective. It won't go away entirely, but will be mitigated to be less important as LLMs and AI get better.
With 100% more snaps? No thanks.
Gensler doesn't much think at all, apparently.

Again, "Crypto is securities" is an interesting proposition, but there are legal tests and crypto doesn't always "pass" all of them. I'm not saying he's definitely wrong, I am saying that there's not enough "homework" out there to prove he's right and he (et al) need to do better about putting up or shutting up.
This system change improves accuracy without increasing cost or complexity. They already are doing these measurements, just adjusting the threshold based on height. The previous system made it so very short people could be very fat so long as they could do the other components, but very tall people had to be rail thin or else automatically fail the test.
I once ordered a cheap, light piece of furniture from amazon.

Instead, I received a full length mirror weighing about 60+lb, normally sold for about $200. It was clearly in the correct box, but had the wrong shipping label on it. Seems unlikely to be caused by theft.

Unfortunately it was a huge hassle to deal with -- I didn't want the item, didn't have the strength to be able to easily move it around myself, and Amazon's return policy simply didn't acknowledge the possibility that I was sent the wrong package!

I ended up simply leaving it by the trash.
Bermuda is nothing like these places. Bermuda is the third largest insurance market in the world, with pretty much every Fortune 2000 company having insurance that comes through here.

The ultimate court (though technically a different body) contains the same people as the UK's Supreme Court, the legal system is accountable to London (through a UK appointed, UK career civil servant called the Governor) as are the police. The laws and taxes are all made and raised locally. There is a high level of infrastructure, safe etc. and best of all (unlike SF) I've never seen anyone defecating in the streets.
Prompt engineering is an 'oil' alright. It's a lubricant to make models work better.

The idea of engineering being backed by solid mathematical understanding is a relatively post-calculus idea. For the longest time, we built bridges a certain way, because those are the bridges that stood. We were flying planes long before we understood flight.

At the end of the day, engineering is the cycle of "identify a pain point -> launch experiments -> observe the delta -> apply the solution". Prompt engineering meets all of those requirements and therefore, is engineering.

It is funny to hear this, because 20 years ago : "is software engineering really engineering" was a rather common phrase around STEM circles.
I have similar questions for code assistance.

Github Copilot seems to be the most effective code assistant currently. It seems to use many heuristics for figuring out relevant snippets to include in prompts, like computing Jaccard similarity of windows of the last 20 opened files. It also tries some tree-sitter cleverness for some languages, but when I snoop on the HTTP traffic it seems to almost always just give up and only include the rest of a file as context.

I have wondered whether a model fine-tuned on my own code would do much better, and be simpler. But perhaps building embeddings and searching them (like in the article you linked) would be superior.

Code assistants need to be super low latency though which maybe complicates things too.
> That’s the thing though, they could lend out and pay interest on “savings” with the understanding that the money might not be immediately available for withdrawal as it’s “in the wild”.

Those are Certificates of Deposit.

> they didn’t seem to get in trouble due to fractional reserve lending but from the liquidity of their assets.

It was the opposite. SVB had over-invested in long-term US treasuries, which are extremely liquid, but were falling in price due to the rapid increase of interest rates. If not for withdrawals squeezing their reserve, SVB could hold onto those treasuries until maturity and get back 100% of their principle.

---

I think the disconnect is that savings accounts are not popularly well understood. People are shocked when they understand that the money they deposited is not sitting in a big vault.

You could tweak fractional reserves to be 20% (or 80%) of deposits, but that comes at a cost too. For example, it would create scarcity of money available for lending, which in turn would make loans more expensive (e.g., higher interest rate mortgages could double the cost of home ownership.)

The current system prevents the worst of bank runs by covering a good chunk of assets with insurance (FDIC in the US). It's a system that allows banks to fail and protect customer deposits.

The collapse of SVB was not a "catastrophe" because the banking system is intended to let banks fail. The alternative is far worse.
FYI, in the learning mission, it often asks something like "Get all of the columns from the "pods_list" table where status is 'functioning', and range is more than 1500."

I think it really means "Get all of the rows from ..."
Here are some sources

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/eye-opener-why-do...

https://www.healthline.com/health/dilated-pupils-love#resear...

https://old.reddit.com//r/askscience/comments/3qu5sx/how_doe...

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170417182822.h...
and people wonder why chat-gpt hallucinates… this is pure overconfident pseudoscience providing zero reference or evidence
The term "natural" is basically meaningless here, and the rest of your comment implies that humans are incapable of saying "no" to change. The Amish, and Richard Stallman, are both counter-examples. We don't have to do anything, and anything that arises we don't have to accept, promote, or integrate into our lives.

We "naturally" made fluorocarbons, and then realized it was a bad idea and stopped.

The notion that free and open informational borders is an unalloyed good has risen to the level of dogma for many in SV, and I think that's a naive mistake. Making bomb making material accessible to an unhappy teenage boy is a bad idea; letting professional manipulators "flood the zone with shit" to perform a coup in a democracy is a bad idea, too, and for similar reasons. Letting it happen to satisfy a dogmatic position is a good way to let your civilization die. And a dead civ has no positions.
Most employment positions in the US are at-will, meaning either party is legally allowed to terminate at any point for no reason given, barring legal protections against discussion and retaliation.

It's different if you're a contractor (i.e. not an employee but hired for a specific contractor term) or in a union (not an issue for most software engineers). My experience with both is indirect.
This is why I said ESSENTIALLY.

Yes, they are technically visible. But so few people know about them and understand them, I'm comfortable with my characterization.
Langchain wrote about LLMs and SQL, and although it's about SQL, it's still a great read, especially the references. https://blog.langchain.dev/llms-and-sql/

I'm also super keen for the 32k API limit for OpenAI, that's going to be great.
It's okay; software engineering isn't real either.

(In many countries, the word "engineer" is regulated -- you can't call yourself an engineer without professional qualifications and oversight.)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_and_licensure_in_...
It is difficult to be well informed about these issues. Even without nuclear you need to think about the grid, environmental impact, economics, supply chains, financing. And nuclear adds complex science and engineering that would take several lifetimes to learn. People want to reduce the problem to one or two easily understood dimensions. We are all insufficently educated.
You can argue till your blue in the face that it opens doors and another can just as easily argue that it closes doors for reasons not worth discussing.

My point had nothing to do with either argument as it not interesting to me. My criticism was in the statement regarding the interview process validating the value of an ex FAANG employee over their experience from working at FAANG.
It's a well known property:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.03429
> I feel ppl like you act in very bad faith, but you also claim crypto isn’t even financial infrastructure, so perhaps you’re just clueless.

You did not present any argument in your defense beyond "I looked at it, trust me br0", and then claimed the person you're responding to is acting in bad faith.

However, the Bayesian in me says that (from a simple search on, say, youtube or twitter), anyone who is extolling the virtues of crypto is highly likely to be selling me something worthless, and thus acting in bad faith. How do you expect people to reconcile these facts?
Alternatively, GP is suggesting these barriers are part of the “natural” change and can have their own positive effects. We can fight them if we wish, naturally, and doing so brings about a necessary balance. But we shouldn’t fool ourselves into believing that we are necessarily “doing good” in relation to the other. And we shouldn’t believe that achieving the extreme, the unbalanced, is necessarily “best”.

“Freedom-of-information fighters” are always simply fighting for a belief and a desire, not a truth. And in turn bringing balance or potentially imbalance depending on one’s assumptions regarding “Mother Nature’s Grand Evolutionary Scheme” or whatever we want to call it. Just as all fighters have been doing throughout time.
I realise now that my messaging with this project is off.

What would more accurately explain the purpose of this project is to reduce the effects of sensationalism and indoctrination in the news.

In other words, provide a platform for readers to make up their own opinions on news stories by filtering out the positive/negative language.

Even if NewsNotFound articles are only 90% neutral, that's 90% BETTER than reading the same story from a sensationalist source.