skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Seems likely the 64e6 time sharper really means that the resolution increased by a factor of 400 (400^3 = 64e6).
Get ClamAV:
https://www.clamav.net
and then use some GUI like ClamTK:
https://gitlab.com/dave_m/clamtk/
Facebook's apps on Android were always second-class citizens.
They rely on the pushshift api to get comments that were deleted. The other comments are pulled by the browser at the time the page is accessed.

Depends on if the changes affect pushshift's crawling.
Great points. And I'd add that thanks to wind and water, ships can also move in directions besides the obvious one. So it's possible in this case the boat could be moving west, giving another direction that left could be relative to.
The Washington State ferry system uses double-ended vessels with a pilot house on each end with the crew swapping between them at each crossing. Whichever end the crew are at becomes the bow.[1]

Funny -- I've ridden the ferries a lot and never really thought about it.

1. https://www.sailnet.com/threads/double-ended-ferries-which-e...
Awesome thanks for the reply. Would you do something like an nginx container if going with ECS? Or any recommendations?
Per another thread, this may not be the case for ferries? At least not for ones that don't turn around. (Note that many "people ferry" boats are able to turn around. Larger car ferries are fully symmetric and have no fixed bow/stern.

Edit: I found more discussion on this by searching for "double ended" boats. Port/starboard do indeed change depending on the direction of travel from all results I've found.
I mean, maybe 0.01% of us will switch to Linux and WINE, and that will show them.
"rent free" is reddit leaking much more than bringing up a politician for a complaint.
I wonder if AI training data can replace ads as a way to monetize web services.
I was talking to a neighbor who works at AWS. Asked how it was going and he said so far so good "I've survived 3 layoffs so far". And I was like, "3 layoffs? I thought there was only one so far?" and he replied that there have been a couple others that weren't publicized so much.
I am not a fan of the RIP Act (and there's plenty more badness in there)

but playing devil's advocate, without this specific offence the disclosure sections would be completely ineffectual

(remember the UK also allows adverse inferences to be made from silence, it is not the US)
Privacy Policy pages aren't really a solution to this, in my opinion. I don't think they reasonably count towards satisfying "informed consent".

First, because they don't actually inform you of much.

Second, because they're tricky to understand if you're not a lawyer. Most of them mean "you have no privacy", but worded in a way that leads you to think you do.

Third, because it's a bit ridiculous to expect everyone to read them. You'd spend more of your time reading those damned things than the page you want to read -- and you'd have to read them on every visit because they can change at any time without notice.

Better is if sites would just give basic, truthful warnings at the moments where you are making a privacy-impacting decision.
Unfortunately, we no longer have consistent steering and docking sides. So first you're going to have to rebuild a lot of ships.
True but you are not wandering around yourself! I agree though that the first para looks like just so nonsense. I know plenty of matelots (UK Navy) that use left and right, sharp end and blunt end for the cardinal points of a vessel. I do as well and use port, starb'd, bow and stern as they do too.

Ironically enough, port and starboard markers which are the red and green buoys you see near to ports (yes!) need to be considered in reverse when going out. The green ones are called starboard markers and if you are in a big enough vessel, you should keep them off your starboard (right) side when approaching a port from the open seas. On the way out from port to the open seas you should keep the red ones on your right instead. If you don't you will hit the seabed and sink.

Once you have got the hang of p/s buoys, you just need to get to grips with cardinal markers and a few other things and the way you drive on the sea will start to make sense. Even Brits drive on the right on the seas!

There is a general rule that "power gives way to sail". That's fine for vessels of similar size.
However I have seen 30' yachts on the Baltic try to persuade 100,000+ tonne tankers of this and not really getting the fact that inertia means that the big lump can't really turn in any meaningful way - they sort of orbit!

Overtaking vessel keeps clear. On odd numbered years when Mars is in Saturn on a Friday you should dance with a Nun for three minutes at midnight every 70 days, unless it's Lent or you are a Nun in which case you should dance with an otter. There are a few more rules but that is largely it. Maritime isn't too complicated but do remember that the road has a habit of jumping 30' or more upwards or down simply for a laugh.
> The ferry is actually a very odd boat in this, btw. As I am not clear that starboard/port are fixed. The boat literally goes in both directions, such that I'm assuming I don't have to know which is the "front" of it irrespective of the direction it is currently traveling.

From what I understand, on ferries (and similar "two-sided" working boats), port and starboard get switched around when the boat changes direction of travel, usually when docked (and its navigation lights also turn from green to red and vice-versa).
right, you are explaining why the law is ridiculous and unfair
Water3D
How long ago was this? Screen sharing[0] and capture[1] works fine in wlroots.

[0]: Supported with workarounds circa 2020, most were merged by 2022 - https://github.com/emersion/xdg-desktop-portal-wlr/wiki/Screencast-Compatibility
[1]: I've had success using `wf-recorder` https://github.com/ammen99/wf-recorder
> Which France intends to build there. I'm not sure if they have started?

To my understanding, the tag "research project" has been mainly used to avoid a crowd of NIMBYs from day one. There is already nuclear waste in the tunnels and not in small quantities. It does work and is used for what it has been designed.

Budget is hardly surprising when we talk about a facility supposed to store the garbage of a country that has been running full nuclear for 40 years.

> Spent fuel is currently sent to La Hague, where afaik they store almost all of it in warehouses

Part of it is there are to be recycle in Mox. An other part is to be re-enriched. The rest will very likely be buried underground since the Fast Neutron reactor plans are unlikely to happen any time soon due to short term politics.
There's a difference between studying a work of art, and literally ingesting that work of art for training. A study is always an interpretation.
I mean the valuation drop had little to do with him and was largely driven by macro or are we pretending other social media companies didn't get cut in half during the same period?

Facebook is still way off the highs and other's like Snap are floating around $10 when it peaked at $80. Twitter tanked from the changing macro environment not anything he did.
Also: this specifically singles out software development for ??? reasons.

Office Manager: 100% expense.

Software Engineer: 20% over 5 years (actually only 10% for the first year).

If they’re international then 6.67% over 15 years.

Not only that, but the effect “stacks” over the years.

So year 1:

1,000,000
- 100,000
————————-
900,000 Profit

Year 2:

1,000,000
- 200,000
- 200,000
- 100,000
————————-
500,000 Profit

Year 3:

1,000,000
- 200,000
- 200,000
- 200,000
————————-
400,000 Profit

Year 4:

1,000,000
- 200,000
- 200,000
- 200,000
- 200,000
————————-
200,000 Profit

Year 5+:

1,000,000
- 200,000
- 200,000
- 200,000
- 200,000
- 200,000
————————-
0 Profit

By the time you get to year 5, you’ve paid tax on $2,000,000 of phantom profits you never had.

If you’re a C Corp that’s $420,000 in extra federal taxes (plus whatever state tax).

If you’re a smaller company you’re probably a S Corp and federal and state tax could be ~50% passed through to your personal return.

How any owner survives that, I’m not sure.
I wonder if there has been a change in how senators are judged by their constituents. We’re they judged on their individual records rather than party records in the past?
If you're on one file system, hard links work as well. They have they added benefit that you can delete an entire tree but files that are linked to from elsewhere won't get deleted or end up with dangling refs.
That's awesome, I've never heard of anyone ripping from their car.

It's interesting that you were collecting for the sake of collection and not gaming. It reminds me of people that go full tilt building PC gaming rigs, but never actually play anything.
I was there 2016-2022. The hiring boom in 2020 was definitely palpable. Entire vast orgs of teams who had no context on the problem they were solving, previous efforts, etc, because they were all so new.
I worked for about a decade in the semiconductor manufacturing industry, at a time (90's) when it was mostly moving out of Silicon Valley (and then overseas). There was a clear pattern that companies that hadn't done layoffs very often, were clumsier (which often felt like "brutal" to those affected), and the ones who had done it through several previous downturns were less clumsy at it.

One of the lessons that companies learned, is that you should do it all in one wave and be done with it (until the next recession), rather than hoping that a small one is all you will need, and realizing a few months later that you were wrong and need to do it again.
> this one is absolutely fucking insane, reminds me of DMT: https://oimo.io/works/life/

"Ah, neat, but what am I missing?" I said before I figured out you could zoom.
Interesting, about 95% of your comments in the last year are saying something negative about Meta/Zuck.
Second this. I've been called for jury duty a couple of times, and one of the things that I've been told every time is that showing up and being ready to be impaneled is an important driver for things being settled (civil) or a plea deal (criminal) being reached.

It's not just something they tell the folks who get called. I've seen it from the other side too where someone I knew was prepared to testify in a criminal case. The defendant pleaded out the day the trial was due to start while we were in the courthouse waiting for the proceedings to begin.
...which will make it easier to websites to identify and track you.
Why Your Life Is Stagnant and You’re Not Making Any Progress (and How to Fix It)
I doubt that, as we left-handers are made up of the same sort of molecule as everybody else.
You’d have to have the power to upset people, take their personal income (bonuses) away, or even fire them outright.

People like this don’t get promoted in large established organisations. They have to be there from the beginning. All of the “asshole CEOs” are in this category. Think of Jobs, Gates, Elon, or Bezos. They all built massive corporate empires by not accepting garbage from their underlings, but this kind of brutal criticism is not nice. Eventually they get replaced by nice managers like Tim Cook, Sundar Pichai, etc… and quality starts heading downhill.

It’s a corporate cycle that’s been going on for centuries.
In theory true. In practice, I'm not convinced that the company Meta actually can do this.
But.. what if it asks to allow tracking based on your internet provider? Then the provider delivers who you are automatically instead of anything you control.
Are screensavers still a thing or is that a dead concept? I haven't had one in ages, but maybe I just haven't been turning it on in my settings.
At this point, the obsession isn't about having everybody or the majority present, its about having the minority, or even anyone at all, present.
There are already tax credits available to "new development" that doesn't include fixes.

So this isn't a new thing to track
And "fore" and "aft" are useful to disambiguate the ends of boats that flip 90 degrees in pitch, because the front becomes the top and the back becomes the bottom.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULvLeK9O7fY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shPATcV9Dzw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQxQfQU_hsk
> I doubt most grant proposals have a 20-30% haircut built into the budget like that...

Most university research budgets do yes, and actually more than that.
Sure, I can. Both the people in the article have glasses.

They are inferior and should not be producing 7 children.

Can you see the problem? I bet they can't.
Concision is way less important than clarity.
> I'm an expat

Mefh...

> (immigrant?)

Upvote.
You think European software companies count software engineering salary expenses as profit that they are taxed on?
The rationale is probably something like, "oops; well crap". Meta hasn't done this very often.
The NFLX share price dropped something like 70-80% after that announcement. At the time, I was a very happy subscriber and it occurred to me that, despite being on a DVD plan, I had only been watching via streaming for quite a while. Got a sense that the market might be overreacting and bought some shares. That turned out to be a great decision, my only regret was not buying more.

I highly doubt that we are going to see that again this time around.
I 100% agree that NPR is biased by left-wing ideology.

I don't really agree about "controlled by", that's like asking someone "who have you voted for" and after they said X, then saying "so you don't have any free will, you are just controlled by X". It's ridiculous: it's not because someone agrees with some party that the party controls them.

But being biased is not in itself a problem: every media is biased, only stupid people believe in neutrality. For example, giving 50-50 time to present each side's opinion is not unbiased: in a parallel universe where one side is, by chance, way bigger than the other (which is very easy to obtain as political trends are strongly based on charisma of few people), then, the 50-50 strategy leads to totally different coverage of the situation. The 50-50 strategy is not being neutral, it's being a sell-out that want to please everyone.
Another example is these situations where the journalist gives equal share to a person that says "it's currently raining" and a person that says "it's currently sunny" (and, please, avoid "it can be raining and sunny at the same time", obviously, my example corresponds to a situation where it is not the case).

At the end of the day, it's not a problem: you have left-wing media, you have right-wing media, as long as they are not lying and that you don't have a society too stupid to live in an echo chamber, then, citizen are given all the information they need to make their own opinion. And if they are living in their echo chamber, the problem is not the existence of biased media, but a society problem.

But in this discussion, the problem is that the label is not "this company is ideologically biased", but "this company is controlled by the government". You cannot blame me for talking about the subject in question. The question of NPR being left-wing is irrelevant, but pushing this in the discussion is in fact even a problem: like if intellectually dishonest labeling are ok because NPR is left-wing.
There is an interesting game theory explanation.

Having the opposite handedness of most other people (i.e. being left-handed) is an advantage in a fight. That's because righties are used to fight against other righties because most people are righties, lefties are also used to fight against other righties. It means that when a lefty fights a righty, the lefty is in a familiar situation while the righty is not, giving the lefty an advantage. And indeed, in many sports where you have an opponent, at high level, there is a higher than normal proportion of lefties.

On the other hand (pun not intended), having the same handedness as most other people (i.e. being right-handed) is an avantage for cooperation. For example, to righties can easily share a tool made for righties, but it will be awkward for a lefty.

So there are two opposing forces here: cooperation tends to make people of all the same handedness, while competition pushes for a 50/50 distribution. We are at about 90/10, suggesting that the cooperation aspect is more important but not absolutely so.

That dominant side is the right side is probably just due to random chance. That it doesn't differ between population groups suggest that it happened before humans spread around the globe, possibly before humans were human.
Thank you for the detailed response--I found this entire subthread interesting!
>they should do it all at once

When I was last laid off, the meeting was concurrent with my friend on another team.

I was not laid off by my manager but my 2x skip; other members of my team were laid off, presumably at the same time, by someone else in our CoC.

So based on these observations, I think for security etc reasons you need to lay people off all at once in batches. Too easy for lag to create ‘insider/outsider threat’ situations.

Obviously my points are redundant if you just do it over email.
https://archive.ph/9Scmr
they need the same terminology for humans:

"raise you left hand. no, your other left!"
@marginalia_nu, Few months ago, you said you would consider open sourcing this search engine. Are there any tasks that us github warriors can help with?
Homeschooling doesn't exist in my country. I hope it works well for you. I know some teachers and strongly believe that they know a lot of things and have skills relevant to teaching children that I do not. So I would never homeschool even given the chance. Also, interactions with other children and strangers in general play a very important part in education, which school does provide in my country. I'm assuming you have your own ways to provide this education, too.

> Would this committee cry itself to sleep

It's possible to have working political systems achieving meaningful goals without anyone involved having to cry themselves to sleep. There's a lot of people who care about improving things (including those who implemented these policies). They really think they can make education better and they're really trying. Now, there will be disagreement about what the goals are and how to achieve any given goal. Over time, a democracy is very good at distilling these disagreements into policies that almost always aren't terrible (as opposed to "occasionally excellent" or something like that). The best way to get what you want is to take part in that process. I'm pretty sure trying to pretend "there's no such thing as society" and that you're living in an anarchy bites you in the back eventually (not that I think you're doing that).

> I'd never say [outrageous]

Maybe that word means something else to you than to me (I learned English in school). I would call a large part of this discussion and these comments here "public outrage". There is public outrage about a reform that made a few schools worse. The outrage lead to a change of policy. This is good and how a democratic process generally works. I also see "outrageous" as a spectrum, where you can of course discuss outrageous things but extraordinary claims (or proposals) require extraordinary evidence (or arguments). Arguing against schools is such an instance in my mind, comparable to arguing against medicine or rule if law (I assume at the very least 98% of people in my country would agree).

I'm aware of US education systems being called broken a lot. We call ours broken too but that only drives efforts to improve it, not giving up. My outside perspective is that the system you have is certainly preferable to no schools at all, that it's definitely possible to improve it, and that it will improve (over decades to centuries) assuming human civilization doesn't (partially) collapse.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/pentagon-gives-stateme...
Imagine being in solitary confinement and this was a clock on the wall...
Well, you need an escalation path when chain of custody is broken. It's great to say you depend on chain of custody, but how do you handle the violations of it? Mistakes happen. But so do attacks. It's probably not reasonable to cancel the whole election based on some missing chain of custody documents, and the (mostly volunteer) election workers can legitimately claim human error. But isn't that an ideal environment for an attacker to commit plausibly deniable ballot fraud?

For example: Swap a pile of mail-in ballots (recently separated from their envelopes) with an equally sized pile of pre-filled malicious ballots. Or, take a bag of ballots from rejected envelopes, mix them with uncounted ballots from accepted envelopes, and then replace some of them with prefilled ballots. Or commit any other uncorrectable chain of custody violation that allows you to introduce new ballots into the count, but that could also feasibly be an accident. When challenged, don't admit to introducing additional ballots, but openly admit to the tainted chain of custody, and claim it was a mistake.

It's unlikely you'll face any real consequence, and you can accuse your opponents of being election deniers. Yet you had the chance to intentionally introduce phantom ballots into the counting process while increasing the expected error margin of any potential audit.

Note that you can still process every legitimate ballot, and confirm to any voter that you processed their ballot. And maybe you can even confirm to any non-voter that you did not process their pre-mailed ballot. But you cannot confirm that you processed only legitimate ballots.

In other words: one plausibly inconsequential broken chain of custody is sufficient opportunity to introduce new ballots unassociated with any real voters.
This ignores other factors. Like the push into the money losing Metaverse or the impact of Ask App not to track.
I... don't know what the hell happened. I was doing the calculation on mobile while on the move and I must've screwed up the parenthesis in the denominator. Embarrassing...

Your calculation is correct. My point still stands (2 million years is plenty of time), but my number given was completely off. I can't edit it anymore though.
Not really. I would answer it, accepting all cookies, cakes and whatever just leave me alone. Then, the next day, I would open the same site, and they will ask me again. This is not just on one device - it's on all of them, and everywhere.

Some are really bad - Admiral requires me to either accept all (hundreds of cookies) or press one link, open a form, then accept a default selection. Some also present me with a confirmation popup. Some I have to stare at for a moment to see where is the puzzle to solve - where is that button.
Well, that is the end game at some point.

Not many companies have eternal R&D.

At some point they move to exploit over explore.
I see. Interesting timing!
I don't think we disagree, my point would be that you need both. But if you rely on 1:1 only you're either quickly going to lose friends or spend all your time in 1:1 (or not make new friends at all, as you can't make new friends in 1:1)
Hmm interesting. Wonder if they have some non-symmetrical parts, like the location of the engine maybe?
Keep in mind the cookie law doesn't just apply to browser cookies, but to other kinds of fingerprinting too. Your proposal would let you be tracked in a persistent way through canvas, localstorage and other forms of entropy easily retrieved from your browser that deleting cookies will not help against.
On a farm, kids are free labor, you already have land to build as big a house as you want, and you've got lots of extra food to feed 'em.
Component driven development on Rails with Phlex