skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I have data collected for 3x MLCC 10 uF + 1x 100 nF but need to make the charts and update the article. Short answer is it's basically just as good and has fewer resonance peaks. I'd also like to do the test with some tantalum 10 uFs to throw in some ESR and see if that tames the impedance spikes even more.
YouTube may have taken down the videos but they also allow him (because of the DMCA) to file a counter-claim and make a claim that the videos aren't infringing.

I think you need to take a look at this objectively. There is a company who obviously made a bunch of games/IP and is telling YouTube that this other person doesn't have the rights to use those games/IP. It seems very reasonable to assume the company is correct. They have a ton of lawyers on staff to knows these kinds of things!

Of course, Eric has been left with a recourse. He can claim to YouTube that yes he does indeed have rights to use those games/IP. It seems entirely reasonable if out of the two parties, one claims that the other doesn't have the rights and the other when presented with the option to claim they have rights doesn't make such claim, that Eric doesn't have the rights to use the games/IP.
Ah, but that function is the input to another function and it’s that other function that’s getting integrated.
> You can scale distribution, but you can't scale quality creation

I'm going to have to start quoting this; it's a much more succinct argument than I've heard before, and it captures the essence far better than I would be able to do even with many more words.
> That wasn't the point.

What's the point then? It's not "puritan pandering".

They screwed up as a company, and other companies stopped working with them. Because they cleaned up their act doesn't mean those same companies are required to come back to the table otherwise it's puritan pandering. Because they now have "ethical standards" does not mean the context of how they ended up in this situation suddenly poofs.
Could this mean a F-Droid type app store on the iPhone? That would be a big deal.
Could you use something like this to summarize the content of a video? Or would you first need to extract the images from the video (like 1 fps, with ffmpeg) and tell the AI to analyze all the images and summarize them like if it was a video?
The headline makes it obvious and the article makes it clear.

It's not “propaganda” just because you have comprehension issues.
I think it's moreso effective co-optimization between equity and meritocracy.

I went to private schools, and even kids of parents with money can wind up very unintelligent—placing them in the same classes as overachievers is good for neither. Same concept as bright kids from underprivileged families, let's bend over backward to get them in the same classes as the overachievers too.
I'm comparing this to libpq, the typical client library for interacting with Postgres in C. Never used either one (though libpq underpins the psycopg2 and node-pg I've used), so I might be naive here. Selecting a single row in libpq looks like:

PGresult *res = PQexec(conn, "SELECT VERSION()");
if (PQresultStatus(res) != PGRES_TUPLES_OK) {
// handle error
}
char* verName = PQgetvalue(res, 0, 0); // Gives null-terminated string.

vs with ECPG:

char verName[100]; // ?
EXEC SQL SELECT VERSION() INTO :verName;
if (sqlca.sqlcode != ECPG_NO_ERROR) {
// handle error
}

It seems wrong that ECPG doesn't allocate a null-terminated string on the heap like libpq. Now you have to manage that yourself, and the intro code examples have buffer overrun risks. Am I missing something? Found this: https://postgrespro.com/list/thread-id/1910796

Aside from that, I'm not convinced yet that this is much easier than using libpq. Is there an example of a bigger difference?
The American Store in London carries has them, for a considerable markup.
‘Radical by Nature’ Review: Alfred Russel Wallace’s Evolution
New map of Reddit built from 334M comments
not disagreeing with you either :)

The killer feature of lead acid designs is cost and availability. In many applications, they are significantly cheaper. The chance cycle issue is real and i’m glad you brought that up. For some applications, they make sense. One is a low power draw solar-powered website. Lead acid batteries also outlast most lithium chemistries by several years. These batteries have been around for decades now are are absolutely everywhere and the voltages are standardized. that alone is a significant advantage.

Case in point - i run a UPS using my old 12 V car battery. Granted, i cannot keep this indoors but it works well.

Similar to what you said - off-grid or backup power is the mainstay of lead acid designs. almost every electrical substation out there uses lead acid for backup power.
I'm not very convinced by the results of this "Auto Linker". I find most of the links in that article are rather useless, linking only to have a link to something.

IMHO links should be chosen "wisely", with the intent of helping the reader to find more information on important parts of the article or referencing other work etc.

Linking to the definition of rabbit holes is not really useful, if I'm not talking about varying sizes and depths of rabbit holes due to different breeds of rabbits and their prefered style of rabbit hole digging.
Why are you conjuring up this unprecedented hypothetical?
Hearing you say this warms my heart. Thanks for voting with your wallet!

It might be worth noting that the Switch is still selling better than the Xbox, so they're technically #2:

Total PS4 and PS5 sales: 149.7 million

Total Switch sales: 122.3 million

Total Xbox One + Xbox One X Sales: 70.5 million

When you pair that with the fact the Switch has sold over 900 million in game sales... well, unfortunately, Nintendo has a long way to fall before they have to wake up and change their tact.
No, you can't.
And if you could, the protections aren't that good.
And if they were, it's not going to happen anyway.
And if it does, that's Apple's fault for making it too easy.
And even so, you deserve it anyway for using Facebook.

I don't think is the argument you think it is. It's basically "nuh-uh" while agreeing with all the arguments in favor no sideloading along the way.

Facebook has 2.95 billion MAUs and 73% of the entire US population actively use it, 93% of businesses are on it -- "just don't use Facebook" is a woefully out of touch take. And this is only Facebook and doesn't include IG and WhatsApp. Meta is 4/4 of the most downloaded apps.
That assumes that 4.81% will remain 4.81% for the foreseeable future.

It's a common tactic to offer premium rates, and then drop the rate precipitously once they meet some quota N months later. Capital One did this circa 2020, for example.

That being said, if you're willing to play the game and monitor your monthly interest rate updates, go for it.

Otherwise, if you're a normal person who likes to ignore their HYSA account, it's prudent to go with people who are offering a rate closer to 4% (e.g. Marcus by GS is currently at 3.9%).
How NATs Work, Part II, Nat Types and Stun
A product available only to iPhone users doesn't strike me as low-margin.
It’s a medium-sized if. So many people said they couldn’t land the Falcon-9 booster.

Ignoring the mars stuff, the vision isn’t that crazy, given their track record.

Biggest questions in my mind are: how rapidly reusable will it actually be (e.g. refurbishment costs), how expensive will it be to scale up the ground systems and launch infrastructure, and what the induced demand will actually look like.

I’m taking for granted that they will be able to land the Super Heavy booster. It doesn’t seem that much of a leap from what they have done before.
I wish I had his enthusiasm.
I think we still have a long way to go before people are actually saying "Bing it." Then it's a serious threat.
How ChatGPT works: a deep dive
Reminds me of that anime from Shinichiro Watanabe: Carole & Tuesday.

I just heard a remix of Jay-Z & Kanye's "Ni*as in Paris," with Biggie as Jay and 2pac as Ye. The AI voice-swap sounded 95-98% like Biggie & Pac. But it did highlight how the flows & cadence of Jay & Ye are their own, while Biggie & Pac have their unique deliveries as well.

It didn't necessarily instill in me a sense of fear for artists in the future, or inspire me to want to find the best songs & musicians & rappers to use this tech out on, or anything like that. But it was well-executed, and illuminated other aspects of these artists beyond the very recognizable tone & pronunciation from each respective artist.

I always thought Biggie had the best flow. His delivery almost has that slightly-off-beat drag, even if he can pretty much self-quantize if he wants to (like in Notorious Thugs). Maybe these AI remixers will hone in on such details soon enough, sort of quantize the deliveries in such a way to be purposefully off-beat and unusual (almost like a Dilla beat with his signature style that makes it a point to be off-the-grid so to speak).
I don't really know much about football (soccer) rules however many sports I've found seem built less on trying to play the sport within the spirit of the game in mind but rather to win. To win teams find themselves looking at the rules closely and deciding how they can manipulate that for their favor.

Baseball is a favorite of mine for this. Whether it's allowing pitchers to add something sticky enough to the ball to manipulate spin. Or the batter creating a really tight window trying to encourage the pitcher to hit them so they walk. Or the opposite which is pitchers deliberately walking good hitters.

Regardless I don't know exactly what they mean by time-wasting. However if it's making games last longer by avoiding play, then couldn't they give an extra ranking point if a team scores so much over the other within 30 minutes?

Of course that means less time to sell beer and snacks.
What do you mean? There's plenty of examples on Android where users have been tricked into sideloading malicious apps.
Ah, now it makes sense. The slope of the sine is "squashed" down by the x->e^x mapping.

Perhaps (regularly) seeing functions plotted on graphs is a necessary precondition to maintain intuition :)
This is a somewhat disingenuous statement. If you go back in time you will notice that was not the case, Then Studios got the bright idea of "product placement" so if a brand wanted to be in a show they need to pay for it, if not they would remove the logos.

In some limited circumstances a company might be able to sue over the use copyright in another work but for the most part fair use would protect them.

The reason they remove the logos today is primarily to extort money from brands not fear over copyright
Yes, deep-linking with SPAs is mostly broken. This came up here a few weeks ago. (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34896472)

Someone defended SPAs by pointing out that frameworks like React use Javascript and browser APIs to fake paths and history, and another noted that reimplementing basic browser functionality was madness.
Author here. Yes, it actually does work. If I’m ever indexing fewer than ~100k documents/paragraphs I would use something like this approach rather than reaching for a vector database.
> Um, again, you’re asking me to go back and figure out what was in my mind at one point or another.

Yeah dude, people expect you to be able to explain your reasoning. Even reasoning that you did in the past(!) which is pretty much all of it.
Think about it this way: any app that refuses to go through Apple's store is telling you that you're not a customer they want. If Facebook makes that choice, it's a great time to give up Facebook!
> It just takes a lot of effort to know what the link in the middle of the text is about.

How does specifically linking the first or last word (of ...the sentence? paragraph?) make things any clearer?

Wouldn't it be best to just link the words that most describe what the linked-to page is about (maybe even the linked-to page title?), no matter where they appear?
Neither did online advertising. Apple today is mostly about leveraging the iOS moat to sell services, the bulk of which will be gross.
This sounded a little sus so I read the NTSB report which did not point the finger the way you said.

My limited knowledge about the BUFF is that if you achieve supersonic flight in one, you are _definitely_ doing it wrong.

My impression of what the purpose of MCAS is for has, accordingly, not been influenced much by your comment.
I'd encourage you to check out Counter-Strike servers which are NOT VAC-secure. Or, well... I don't know how much these servers exist anymore, with matchmaking being so dominant. But back before CSGO, if you joined a server that didn't have VAC enabled, you would have about a 90% chance of it being unplayable due to speedhacking, spinbots, etc. The other 10% was probably still full of people fine-tuning their use of aimbots, wallhacks, etc.
Because 'mean things' shared on the internet have real life consequences?
They own the IP they can do what they e
want. Seem like every few years some creator freaks out because they didn't like what you did and take it down. It is in their right to do so. Free Use can only be decided by a judge in the US. Until more band together a fight then nothing will change.
Lack of Product sense. Not an engineering problem.
Fabrice Bellard has run a standard set of benchmarks w/ lm-eval on a big chunk of open models here: https://bellard.org/ts_server/ - Flan T5 XXL and GPT-NeoX 20B both outperform Pythia 12B on average (LLaMA 13B+ tops the charts).
> Give them a score-based percentage of $200/mo for hitting certain criteria each month.

Yes, let's embed the fundamentals of wage-slavery at even younger ages.
I think there may be some truth here.

My observation has been that remote work is often a perk of already good jobs with good pay. I don't see a lot of minimum wage remote work. A good chunk of remote workers don't strictly _need_ more money, and are unlikely to be enticed with a 10% raise.

I'm kind of in the same boat as you. I work remotely, and am not particularly interested in going back to the office. I probably do have a $x that would get me back in the office, but it would probably take something like a 50-100% total comp raise. I'm doubtful anyone wants to pay that, and even if they did I'd be concerned about job security at that level of pay.
Good lord. $100k minimum for a 4% yield? In Canada you can get that at any bank with $100 in your account.
Absolutely agree, I felt the same when trying out GPT, making it write a story.
While it was technically impressive, I lost interest after the first few lines, simply due to the lack of an actual, human author behind the story.
IMO, these types of listings (power supply for <insert popular development board>) prey on people who don't have a ton of EE knowledge. A pack of 10 2A buck-converter modules from Aliexpress will run you about $5
with both this and https://Open-Assistant.io, I believe we have entered the Stable Diffusion era of large language models
There are two Cybotrons. One is an Australian rock band from the 70s and the other is Juan Atkins and Richard Davis from Detroit.
While the latter had some rock influence as well, they predominantly did “Detroit electro” driven by drum machines like the 808, prime example being Clear.
First of all, firmware bugs can physically damage some hardware, some might even be dangerous to use (e.g. overheat and catch on fire).

It just increases support costs and liability for the manufacturer for little or no gain.

On the security front, having the source code leaked makes it much easier to develop APTs and deep implants.

So it's easy to see why it's not something most manufacturers embrace willingly.

The nerd in me really would love to have access to more open. firmware, but I get where the apprehension comes from.
I can also personally vouch for Teach Your Child to Read in 100 Easy Lessons. It accelerated my ability to teach my kiddo to read by doing exactly what I wasn't an expert in - designing a reading pedagogy. We worked though the book in pandemic kindergarten and I can't help but attribute his current reading success to the work we did back then. It was a silver lining in a time of uncertainty and the memories I have of us working through the book together are memories I'll cherish for the rest of my life.
AI made this VLOG [video]
People making videos think they’re free advertising, but that doesn’t mean they’re the kind of ads companies want. Corporations have an image they want to maintain, it’s pretty egregious to think you’re doing them a favor making money off of their products.
From what I recall, you hear "because that's the way it is" a lot.
That just means they're not testing reentry in the next several flights. They have a new heat shield design that will fly later.
Nope.

My position -- stated elsewhere -- is we can't really know for sure and it's not worth my time to try to figure it out.

Multiple people have some issue with me feeling that way and feel compelled to tell me I'm wrong, it's knowable, here are the facts -- though they weren't there personally.

Why so many people feel compelled to argue this with me is beyond me.

But I feel entitled to not care and not agree with people insisting they know for absolute certain what happened decades ago to someone else based on reading stuff and they are right for caring and feeling absolutely certain and I'm wrong for not.
> A big one is that the firmware is the piece that not only interacts with but also protects the hardware. If you are easily able to change the firmware, you are easily able to destroy the hardware, and if that's under warranty, companies are going to be concerned.

Is that justifiable, though? I bricked a router some time ago messing around with ddwrt. I thought about soldering on a TTL serial adapter, to recover it, but didn't end up getting around to it, but never in my wildest dreams did I think of asking Netgear to replace the 8-year-old product I broke through my actions. I do know at least one person who is reckless with "no questions asked" warranties, and would ask for a refund with a straight face after trying to use a router to reduce spaghetti sauce spattering when he microwaved his dinner, but these people can't be that common...

One area where it does seem slightly more justifiable is FCC-certified radio devices. If the transmitter power level is restricted by law, I'd prefer that end users/modifiers of the firmware be considered legally responsible for the consequences of their own actions, but I understand that pragmatically it's a lot easier to ask OEMs to lock down firmware after getting certified in a test lab than to monitor a million end users.
> English has a phonetic alphabet after all, right?

Yes, that's why "right", "write" and "rite" all sound different.

Oh, wait...
I have never heard of people using method patents to sue over methods other than things similar to methods in the claims. Usually, the claims are as general as you can get away with, and cover a lot more than just the actual "X" that they are introducing to the market. When someone does something similar to "X" without reading the patent, they can easily be walking in one of the claim sets that has been patented in the "method to do Y" patent. Most people who want to copy something do it in a fairly unoriginal way.

Still, patent claims are never as broad as "drug to alleviate headaches" or anything similar.
+1.

Also people way underrate how little there has always been in any form of art that wasn't simply copy-pasting or data-driven and that includes most of the content we consume, but especially modern tv/movies/music.
TVtime worked faster but if didn't have LIRC support, I can't remember. If it did, it was to setup, much more lightweight but without recording support.

Nowadays Kodi/XBMC it's the spiritual sucessor.
I'm talking about the picture with the caption "the latest iteration of my solar setup".

Maybe you tripped over the text "So I decided to build a new setup inspired by Will Prowse solar demo setups, which is pictured below:", which I understand as "So I decided to build a new setup, pictured below, which was inspired by Will Prowse solar demo setups:".
> I'm dreading this. I want privacy hostile companies like Facebook to have to comply with the app store rules

I can't honestly understand this argument.

Are you afraid of yourself?

If you don't trust Facebook, don't install their app.

App store or not, nothing changes, what the app is allowed to do is the exact same thing, they're asking for the exact same permissions, that you can grant or not on a per app/per permission basis.

End of the story.

But if I want to install an app that I completely trust, because I know the developer or I have developed it myself, I can't install it now.
I think developers who don't want to give 30% are going to have to deal with a new enemy: Piracy. The moment sideloading is available for iPhone, I expect within weeks there will be a cool, first-of-its-kind piracy App Store. As well as, within months, a cool, first-of-its-kind hacked game clients for iOS App Store. I think Epic Games might quickly discover that 30% might be lost to Apple or Piracy, pick your poison.
The origins are not necessarily known nor relevant to the end user. This was posted as an open-source motion-graphics tool. That's all we know going in. Therefore one's expectations for this project do not differ from those for any other open-source project that doesn't specify platform up-front.
I seriously doubt watching a speed run has sold any units at all. Those are the things people watch for games they already love.
> How could we implement such a right?

I can't even begin to answer the first question until the second question is at least sketched out. What does "right to repair" even mean in software? Software is very different than physical machinery in many really important ways.

Technically, in the US, you already have the "right to repair" except in the cases where you'd need to break an access control to do it. Revisiting the DMCA anticircumvention laws strikes me as the best path to "right to repair".
Because Facebook announced publicly that Apple's privacy policy changes would cost them $10 billion[0], putting them on the record as having strong motive to avoid the App Store.

0. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/02/facebook-says-apple-ios-priv...
How is the community build? Was it just a form?

Demo is pretty good. Probably people are looking for a one click solution.

Scrap a list from twitter/linkedin
Set reach out purpose
Auto reach out to all
Good product people have always been visionary, lead by a strong sense of design and understanding of how to meet the user needs.

Product Managers are the modern day bureaucrats created to reduce the individual impact on product and make PMs hot swappable like engineers (who I also think are better when they they have the aforementioned skills).

Google should be considered in object lesson in the problems of trying to bureaucratize product creation.
>This is racist and harmful rhetoric.

It's not racist or harmful to state the historical fact that sub-tropical people have a long and strong relationship with drums that is unrivaled elsewhere on the planet.

Populations that exhibit no natural ability to move to drum based music could not invent drum based dance music genres except through derivation in which case its not invention, just mimicry.
Thought Examinations, Indoctrination Meetings and Struggle Sessions
I have generally found that people don’t take project managers very seriously, sort of like a human interface to a spreadsheet. Where are you that they are actually creating projects?