skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It is not patently untrue. It wholly depends on the reader’s opinion of Bob. Also most people’s intelligence is not that much greater than that of a little kid. They are only more knowledgeable, but not necessarily more intelligent.
And people win the lottery multiple times in a row.
if you consider Spotify recommendations as AI then you should consider also Youtube and every social network based on a non-time based timeline and ads, no?
>If they are confident that this data does not exist, why would they start seizing hardware?

As retaliation or as a punitive measure. Basically, just to spite them.
This feels like someone negging Apple in 2007 "Palm invented the smartphone, what has Apple done" lol
"Papers have little/no impact on perf" - this is a ridiculous and false claim.
Almost every single advancement in any field has come from academia. Sure, it may not be recognized as such by the general public because they aren't experts in the area - but the fact remains that academia is pretty much the only way to progress as a society. Companies just take what academia gives them and make products out of it for their own profit (not to completely trivialize that - it still comes with it's own set of challenges), but the private sector is completely misaligned with making real progress towards hard problems. Deepmind is one of the examples that continues to show this despite being a 'corporate entity' in that the large advancements seen are out of their employment (i.e. giving their excess of capital) of professors at universities who focus on their research.
I’m not so sure. Many other "household names" on askscience seem to be highly upvoted, apparently without shenanigans (but who knows?!) Even I have several 1000+ karma answers there, and many more 100+ ones and I’m a nobody. There’s also simply not that much competition on askscience! If you’re consistently able to write good, a-few-paragraph answers to questions in a particular field, and are also available for discussion and followup questions, it’s not that difficult to become commonly recognized and reap a lot of karma there without having to compete against others.
On my, under-powered, desktop, the tab crashed. Has anyone made/extracted a map yet?

Found these items before my tab crashed:
a pretty leaf,
a secret glade,
a holographic Charizard business card,
11 squares packed into a larger square,
an orb wren,
a tumbleweed,
a marsh wren,
a DVD of The Core (2003),
a broken smoke machine,
The Long Now Foundation's nickel paperweight containing , an archive of every published Animorphs book,
a sunken treasure,
an asterisk,
a satisfying set of waves,
a secret leaf,
a stick,
a sterile neutrino,
a pair of squirrel goggles,
a steam calliope,
a dna base pair,
an eye in the sky

It was a fun excursion.
A bunch of stainless steel rain is not that bad as pollution goes.
As much as I'd love an OpenAI-style API from Google, I'm not expecting that. It will probably be "profitable" to them in the unseen backend making Search, Google Assistant, etc better. I've been playing with Bard a lot and it's pretty good, but OpenAI's API offering just makes them so much more useful to me since I can use whatever app I want (or even write my own) to consume the product, and it's easy for me to see the value for my dime.
Ah thanks! That's an obvious counter example!

But as a followup, are there definitions that rely the rate at which sets approach infinity? P clearly "fills" its set more slowly than the even integers whereas the evens and odds "fill" the set in similar times. This would obviously mean 2Z, 3Z, and 3Z - {3} would be the same size (unless we invoke the disjoint requirement), but these could be used categorically like Big O notation (which can be refined).

Would this an even useful metric? Are set theorists even interested in differentiating these infinities?

Edit: I also gave a bit more motivation in the reply to your sibling comment. Short is that if we do "Z - 2Z" we can get the two sets of positive odds and negative odds without {0}. It seems reasonable that since we can do this decomposition and match in the normal manner that since there is a remainder that one would be larger than another but this also does not clear up the example you provided with primes.
I am very proud to have been involved in the Nature Conservancy's effort to restore wetlands in Oregon. I completely agree that land acquisition is a great path forward, as long as the longevity of that acquisition can be secured.

https://www.prweb.com/releases/2007/10/prweb565374.htm
It's not that easy, but it's not exactly difficult, either. I've seen more complicated baking recipes. The hard part is not having the DEA kick down your door, shoot your dog, and throw you in a cage.
Might want to look into zinc for these stuck stem cells:

Zinc Promotes Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Proliferation and Differentiation towards a Neuronal Fate
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5932442/

Quercetin/Zinc complex and stem cells: A new drug therapy to ameliorate glycometabolic control and pulmonary dysfunction in diabetes mellitus: Structural characterization and genetic studies
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal...
The collective value of your View/Clicks is far higher than $10 to advertizers per month. Most people wouldn't pay that amount.

This is just like insurance. Old people are subsidized by young. A rich person's View in the developed country is subsidizing Google just being available to a poor person elsewhere.

Don't assume that (a) people are ready to pay the true cost of running a site like Google without ads or (b) that it will even end up being a good thing for humanity overall.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higan_(emulator)#Author

We just recently lost Near, a brilliant person who probably had one of the best understandings of the SNES out there, and built multiple import SNES emulators because they were bullied into suicide for being non-binary.
SAR is a thing, works perfectly well through clouds, and is pretty easy to use to detect deforestation.
It means they're going all out on a pure garbage, 100% manipulative content format. With no pretense of any intent to actually inform, or connect the reader with other human beings in any meaningful way.

The very essence of generative AI applied to profit-driven journalism, in other words. And the ultimate realization of BuzzFeed's business model from the very beginning.
OpenAI from a research point of view haven’t really had any “big innovations”. At least I struggle to think of any published research they have done that would qualify in that category. Probably they keep the good stuff for themselves

But Ilya definitely had some big papers before and he is widely acknowledged as a top researcher in the field.
I wasn't aware - can I ask do you know of any similar efforts where the revenue generating side and the 'meaningful to humanity / pulizter' side have maintained the mitochondrial relationship? It doesn't seem to hold up well to business administration tactics.
I'm not saying a parent would start drinking with their underage kids, I'm saying kids can often get alcohol themselves from their friends parents (either directly or indirectly) even if their own parents tell them they shouldn't drink and don't give them any.

It still happens, but it's a lot less socially acceptable, and it happens a lot less.
Free trade == good when it undercuts local industries and forces dependency on foreign industry.

Free trade == bad whenever we're getting beat at our own game.
That's because Byzantium was the eastern wing of the Roman Empire. Justinian I (the emperor in the wikipedia article) is remembered for being behind the last almost successful attempt to take Rome back from the hands of the barbarians and reunite the Empire's two heads.

The two heads in the Byzantine flags, that is. Byzantines called themselves "Roman", and everyone else in the area called them "Rum" (i.e. "Roman") because they were Romans.

And this guy was the Last of the Romans:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belisarius
There was an idea of adding aluminum powder to exhaust and hovering a little over the pad, so that you deposit a solid metal surface where you intend to land.
Yes.

Further, I don't understand how explicit examples of company infighting over autonomy doesn't already address your point.
And how does that compare with what OpenAI has accomplished since 2015?

I'm not blaming DeepMind here.

It was Google's job not to start loosing ground to Microsoft in the age of AI.
Though this is usually how it goes - big successful companies begin to bend towards regulatory capture after having their period of upstart growth and disruption. They make as much money as possible for shareholders on their cash cow and its management culture's primary objective to make sure this is not disturbed.

Think about how many decades head start IBM had to perfect search, but search wasn't their core competency.

Delivering advertisements is Google's core competency.
It seems that GPS signals can be used for higher accuracy if the receiving equipment uses two frequencies instead of one. This can freely be done by civilians, but requires more expensive equipment. Perhaps this solution with SBAS requires a cheaper setup?

https://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/performance/accuracy/
> They are good at execution

You're reiterating their point. Yeah, Google has competent AI people but that means nothing for their own success if they can't execute. OpenAI has proven that.
You're missing the reason this is important - the companies that run those apps (spotify, facebook, steam, discord, etc.) will be able to correlate your VPN connection with your non-VPN connection, and tie those both to an app account that identifies you.

It means unless you've got a dedicated download/seed box running your torrent downloads, one that doesn't have anything else on it and never connects to anything without a VPN connect, it's possible to track you down way more easily than you would think.
I think a more charitable read of OP is that you don’t need a satellite (or even GPS) to provide centimeter-accurate localization over a wide area. Spacebound systems are always going to have worse uptime and less resiliency than ground ones.
The US government does provide an SBAS called the WAAS, operated by the FAA. It's also had a hand in designing and operating a number of other augmentation systems [1], including CORS, GDGPS, and NDGPS. As an aside, don't you just love how many government acronyms there are?

[1] https://www.gps.gov/systems/augmentations
Or at least change Fahrenheit to Celsius. heh.
Try archive.org. Many UK mobile providers block it outright, without even an age bypass, because it can be used as a proxy to arbitrary sites.
Dude, just go out and eat that steak sandwich if you want. Make your choice and be content with it. Do you have experience with actual, in-person interactions with people where they tried to make you feel guilty for eating one, or are you letting some random comment by some random person on the internet ruffle your feathers?

Yeesh.
Product based on no fundamental innovation is also a path to irrelevance. If there was even something remotely defensible in GPTs then OpenAI would not have sold 50% of company for 10B dollar. Only a matter of time and large about of human in the loop will bring any large transformer model into the same space as shown by recent models like alpaca and vicuña are showing that. Only thing the whole thing has done is no labs will open source any major breakthroughs anymore
The ironic thing is that the performance analysis paper [*] found that the weird bit-aligned instructions iAPX 432 didn't actually help code size.

"Although the 432 has bit-variable length instructions, it requires more space than either the 68000 in Pascal or the VAX in C. Reasons include the lack of immediates and the inability to refer to a local variable or constant using fewer than 16 bits of address."

(From a modern perspective, the test programs are absurdly small: 120-2900 bytes. Nowadays, you probably couldn't even create a program that small.)

[*] https://archive.org/details/PerformanceEvaluationOfTheIntelA...
Am I hallucinating or didn't several of the examples have background audio artifacts, like it's been trained on speech with noisy backgrounds, I'm guessing audio from movies paired with subtitles? Having random background audio can make it quite hard to use in production.
You're not prototyping rockets correctly if you don't expect in the back of your mind some chance of bombastic events. They are the epitome of "engineer it to within an inch of its expected safety margins for the mission".

Sure once you are going for human rated you want all those bugs figured out, but how do you find those safety margins without pushing up to and over them?
I was confused by this as well.

Then I learned GPU are basically a bunch mutli-core with each core having a vector extensions and what Intel would call 'hyperthreading'.

At least that how I think about it.
> Government, in a democracy, is supposed to represent the choices of the people. They serve us

And most of us prefer a large and strategic employer not be obliterated over fixable sanctions violations.
I certainly haven’t! But the canonical example would be Xerox’s Alto vs the Macintosh.
> If you pick one and call it N, there's an infinite quantity of real numbers between 0 and N and between N and 1. Therefore it's impossible to assign an index to N.

This isn't "sloppy language", it's just wrong. Don't try to downplay spreading misinformation. It remains true that there are infinitely many rationals in (0, N) and (N, 1), and yet it is entirely possible to enumerate the rationals (i.e. assign indices).

> There's an infinite number of those between 0 and 1 as well, but because it's a subset, there are "fewer" of them.

Also misinformation. (0, 0.5) is a subset of (0, 1) yet the two sets have the same cardinality, whether we take them both in Q or both in R.
FAIR will continue to publish. Nvidia and Uber also. Then you have open source oriented labs who should continue publishing. Google is the big one. They have made more research contributions than all other labs combined basically.
The term for this is "neoliberal." Classical liberalism birthed the Gilded Age and the series of economic failures that gave rise to communism and WW2. Neoliberalism encompasses a series of ongoing experiments with micromanaging economic tendencies. It will most likely die an even worse death than classical liberalism.
yes but requires the Police to have the right warrants and tools

and the server to not detect it due to e.g. network disconnect, or you not giving it the latest versions of rooling keys etc.
Plasma donation is an effective way to reduce PFOAs.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle...
The issue is that their qualifications are not recognized in Germany, so they are not allowed to pursue their profession.

These people did not just willy nilly decide to move to Germany. They had to leave their home country because of a civil war. At least they're safe, but they're being held back by illogical bureaucratic hurdles.
is not that what Brave browser was trying to solve?
Now, I know what you’re thinking. AI generated listicles? But keep in mind that human written listicles tend to be just as bland.
The sooner the war ends, the sooner the violence stops. If Russia wants to promote peace, they can leave anytime.
From what I’ve read about logging in the Amazon this wouldn’t do much. Basically no one would care about your deed unless you have boots on the ground there.
This isn't 1993 anymore. Beidou and Glonass (and Galileo) are global networks that do the same things for those other countries, and the ITAR restrictions on GPS receiver altitude and velocity are increasingly able to be overcome by a hobbyist in a garage, much less a nation-state.
I've seen MidJourney's estimated revenue at about $750k/month. Not bad.
Oh no, my joke registration of busfeetnews.com was totally in vain. :-(
Florida Apologizes After 4:45 A.M. Emergency Alert Test
The i860 failed for entirely different reasons though. It was really a vector engine that could manage some general compute with some grumbling whereas the 432 was built for general purpose applications written in Ada.

But I guess they did both fail for the same reason: they were more expensive and slower than x86 when running regular applications. Itanium would follow this trend. Come to think of it i860 and Itanium are far more closely related, both suffering greatly from the Intel hardware engineers punting on the difficult instruction scheduling issues with the architecture and the compiler writers not being able to pull the rabbit out of the hat and magically fix those issues. So you have chips that only ever perform properly on trivially parallelizeable tasks and are slow on the vast majority of code.
| Are you doing alright?

No.
I mean for production, with scripts/playbooks/firewalls/rbac/storage/networking/ingress/logging/backups/etc. Yeah, you can stand up a toy cluster in matter of minutes, but that’s not the same.
The Soekris net6501 was an Intel Atom with a Xilinx FPGA. Alas, Soekris closed for somewhat similar reasons several years ago, though a bad batch of chips from Intel which caused an RMA nightmare didn't help and may have been what pushed them over the edge.
https://archive.ph/dzyDX
There were multiple unexpected "energetic events" seen by observers apparently due to some of the engines failing around liftoff. These "energetic events" could have contributed to greater than expected downward force under the launchpad. If correct, it seems positive that the excess energy was directed downward still permitting the liftoff. That the ship was able to continue the flight through Max-Q and up to MECO and starting the separation spin maneuver seems like a very positive sign. I believe they've already started construction of upgraded launch facilities which include fire trenches and water deluge systems. This first launch facility was basically a V 0.1 test and it appears to have done its job of getting a Starship test article in the air. It's important to remember their development strategy is pipelined and intentionally test-to-failure with multiple improving prototypes in simultaneous parallel construction. Today's test ship was already several versions old.

Also, the rocket didn't exactly "blow up", it apparently lost attitude control during the separation spin maneuver and couldn't achieve the parameters necessary for stage separation. The subsequent rotations appeared to be attempts at automated attitude recovery. The eventual termination was a controlled FTS initiated when SpaceX determined the flight was unrecoverable. I found it incredible that a supersonic rocket about twice as big as anything humans have ever launched was able to rotate several times at around 1300 Mph and over 100,000 ft altitude while maintaining structural integrity. Fortunately, it appears they were able to delay detonating the controlled demolition charges long enough to receive the vital telemetry data that was the entire reason for today's test. That this early prototype managed to load fuel, pressurize, ignite engines, clear the tower, reach MaxQ, MECO, start the separation turn and then down link all the data makes it a massive success from SpaceX's perspective. Everything after MaxQ was pure bonus territory. The engineers at SpaceX must be thrilled to be ingesting all that sweet data from hundreds of internal sensors and start comparing real-world performance against their simulation models.
"weight loss relapse" seems like a weird way of saying "body weight increases".
> The problem is nobody wants to make a hundred purchasing decisions per day.

Why would I mind that? Seriously? It would be as smooth as voting on HN/submissions that you already do anyway.

The infrastructure does not exist. And no, paypal only sounds more like a dystopia than micro transactions.
I see... generally I like seeing the list of providers, and to compare them easily, though I don't know if I would actually use the site as a private person. Changing bank as a private person is quite a hassle (and banks know this... but I digress).

Though I think if I was a (small) business owner I would definitely try to fish around...
One of the architects of Larrabee was very involved in RVV. He has some lots of good talks on Vector ISA stuff.
> gist of the comment is not on the downvotes of that particular comment in and of itself

The gist doesn’t matter. You commented on being downvoted. That’s against the guidelines and gets flagged. Your comment is stronger without the throwaway bit at the end.
>> Back in 541-542 an outbreak killed about 40% of the city’s population.

An outbreak of the plague.
Why Quebec in particular?

I know the French Canadians have a reputation for being open-minded (judging by the attitude toward the LGBT community at least, from what I've been told).
Something optimistic:

"Skating away, skating away, skating away
On the thin ice of the new day"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5D9HZyYI6g

(still it's a sad event :-( )

... i think it's the ghost of the Soviet N1 project - it's quite a challenge to have more than a dozen engines working togather; all of these engines start to responate - it's downhil from thereon...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9fkYIrRwbo
Politics ruins everything.

You can not be a fan of Musk the person and still appreciate stuff like this.
Facing the Music: We Need You to Subscribe to the Quietus
200 lines @ 40 tokens per line equates to 8,000 tokens. That costs $1.60. for one query.
I think the fact that there are no other systems publicly available that are comparable to GPT-4 (and I dont think Bard is as good), points to innovation they havent released
Ask HN: If WeWork can reimagine itself why can’t other struggling companies?
End of the day, the best product innovation has come from hungry passionate and capable founders with a solid mix of science, engineering and product.

As we are now seeing before our eyes, Google has aged. Big tech cushy culture does no longer creates an environment that yields innovation.

The MSFT move was probably brilliant most for this reason. They saw the writing on the wall. ChatGPT would never have been invented at any big tech co.

Goog investment in anthropic is just taking msft sloppy seconds and kind of copy cat play. Who knows maybe anthropic will make a happy mistake and create something surprising.

You are likely reading the result of a lot of corporate reorg that was a big political battle and the victors are now patting themselves on the back.

That said, reorg can be good to refocus the company, but you’re bleeding out massively while the infection spreads, putting a little bandaid is no reason to celebrate.

Anyways wish them the best of luck. As a kid it was always one of those companies we all dreamed to work for. Now it is like an aged grandparent who needs a cane to walk and encouragement when they are able to walk by themselves.
I'm pretty sure we got below the 50% farmer threshold without using GPS. Or has this all happened in the last twenty years?
Competition is such a beautiful catalyst.
People can be negative and critical for no reason. In this case, I think criticism is due because Google's failure to productize has lead them to a potential existential disaster. Most of their revenue depends on search and there being an ecosystem of websites to link to and display even more of their ads. Generative AI is an existential risk to their current search interface, the ability to insert ads into that experience and there even being any ad-supported websites with free content to link to.

With the reports that Samsung may switch to Bing, you could quickly see an exodus in users over to chat search. It wouldn't take much lost revenue to implode Google's business model and the business model of every ad-supported site on the internet.