skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You’ve changed the context from medical use to recreational by druggies with irresponsibly high doses feeling like suicide afterwards. I have a sense of the point you’re attempting but it’s murky and isn’t a useful response.
I've noticed that this only happens to me if I edit a login from the iOS password integration rather than from the app itself. For example, if I hit the password icon on the keyboard to bring up 1Password and create/edit a login from there, I'll encounter that same issue. One (rather annoying) workaround is for me to kill the 1Password app and when I reopen it, the last login I created/edited outside the app will pop up in edit mode. I close it and redo the process with the second last login I've created/edit popping up and I close it. I iterate until all the logins I've created/edited outside of the app stop popping up.

It's a rather peculiar bug.
If it's a one speed, is it a manual or an automatic?
Say what you mean. "..." is not a useful comment.
In many companies, using your personal device is grounds for immediate termination.
The LED Debacle
I think it's also the responsibility of societies participants to not seek profit from activities that harm and undermine the society they're a part of. If all we do is play zero sum games and try to get as much money as possible from the people around us for the least effort, you end up with this modern-west mess where we're all shooting each other's feet off to be the tallest instead of... building stools?
There's a similar thing with a check ride for a pilot license; the examiner has to tell you when you fail (because plane is expensive, etc) - and ask if you want to continue. Almost everyone recommends that you do even though you're guaranteed not going to pass; because if there's anything else you want it caught for the debrief.
Talk through it.

The field you want is "family dynamics". If things are already off the rails, find a mediator (doesn't have to be an actual legal mediator).

1. Understand their viewpoint and give them the tools to understand yours

2. Find common ground and define the areas of conflict

3. Reassure and reaffirm relationship

4. Repeat
It's hard to overstate the continued benefits of the Landsat program. Virginia Norwood's work helped set the stage for new industries. NASA's write-up about her from 2020 includes more details about the Multispectral Scanner System she worked on.[0]

[0] https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/article/virginia-t-norwood-the...
Wine 8.0.1
Wasserstein Metric
It's weird how people will sea lion about how "conservative views are being deplatformed" while refusing to admit that the "conservative views" that are in question are their beliefs that entire groups of human beings shouldn't exist.
The reason will shock you!
How will you convince the majority of the population reading Buzzfeed listicles?
How well does Cozo handle larger than RAM data? Does it only need to keep the query's answer set in memory?

By larger than RAM I mean the entire WikiData knowledge graph (~100GB), with something like 16GB of RAM.

Another question: any plans for supporting Parquet files with query pushdown? I honestly doubt Parquet's efficiency can be matched with RocksDB (but I'm happy to be proven wrong), and having to convert big datasets is always a pain...
Facilitating (likely) money laundering isn’t really a great idea
Have you considered making it into a software package?

You could take any custom code you wrote (like the layout of the pages) and make a guide on how to remake your site from scratch (what software packages you ran, OS, things like that) and post that to github as open source.

That would allow you to keep your baby but then let your electric grandchildren float off into the internet to see where they might sprout.
Laws can be fixed to address this. ADHD laws are being changed to address the pop up online mills from during covid.
1619 was a series of essays written by different people. Many were very good and some were terrible.
Me too! They are always great.
I’m a Senior Software Engineer. What Would GPT-4 Need to Do My Job?
I see it too. I suspect non-Americans consume a lot of US media and as a result feel sufficiently educated but they look just as silly and ignorant as Americans who think Europe is a country.
The idea would be not to punish the corporation itself (a nebulous concept in any case), but to punish the decision makers that made the decision to pursue illegal profits. Fire the executives and the board, as they're the ultimate decision makers, and have the entire set replaced by a team with clearer judgement of the line between right and wrong.

This would accomplish the desired intent without perturbing the number of players in the market place.
A.Iran envisions the future of women's rights in Iran in 2026 if current political conditions within that country are allowed to continue - or if we take action. The book's eight chapters were written entirely by GPT-3/3.5/4, with artwork generated with RunwayML, and features a choose-your-own-adventure component that allows readers to switch between different scenarios.
Ah; I bet if title was "Legal Canadian adult site forced shut down due to billing processor" or something that provided context, it might have gotten more traction. Otherwise "Random site you've never heard of shutting down" does not entice interest necessarily :-/

( edit: Also, in your "Fuck Banks" page, I'm assuming " pay for offense expenses" is meant to be "pay for office expenses", in which case you may want to change it as "offense expenses" would go against much of the rest of the message of your post :-> )
That’s just offloading all the work to someone else and trusting their experiments and judgement.
> When she opened the TikTok app on his iPad, she found a library of more than 3,000 videos her son had bookmarked, liked, saved or tagged as a favorite. She could see the terms he’d searched for: Batman, basketball, weightlifting, motivational speeches. And she could see what the algorithm had brought him: many videos about depression, hopelessness and death.

Horrific.
I concur ive been using it daily for all sorts of tasks, cant read Microsofts docs round it up get the important stuff i love it :)
The key difference is that this is 100% reusable. With Falcon and Falcon heavy, the second stage is non-recoverable which is still quite expensive.
Were you able to paste his writings all in one prompt without exhausting token space? Or did you have to do something tricky to get around that?
FF = Front-wheel drive

FR = Rear-wheel drive

For anyone else who couldn't puzzle out WTF those meant, I'll save you looking it up.
> interest on the US debt will soon be over $1 trillion a year

And that trillion dollars gets, what, flushed down the toilet? No, it goes into the hands of bond-holders, who spend it the same way they spend the rest of their money, including on plucking hairs out of mice to study aging. (Obviously I mostly agree with you here, just nitpicking the idea that that trillion dollars is "wasted" somehow.)
If you watch the launch broadcast, the hosts set the expectation that they success meant achieving thrust-to-weight of >1 and clearing the launch facility.

Furthermore, we don't know there was a failure to separate. If I had to guess, once the vehicle was in an unstable attitude outside of the nominal flight path, they triggered the self-destruct and purposefully didn't try to separate.
Probably more like tulips maybe but Linux actually provides legitimate value for people. Hard to see what value Bitcoin has to anyone other than people wanting to launder, extort or transfer money illegally.
So sad that people focus on a mistaken belief that stuff like this could be used to diagnose disease in a patient when tools like this may someday help researchers eliminate some kinds of diseases entirely.
you're only 30 years too late, that must be some kind of record
> It is illegal for you to build and detonate a bomb in the city

It is illegal to kill someone, even without a gun, under most circumstances. Perhaps we should make it double-illegal?

> Far fewer than random gun violence in places you are allowed to carry guns

This is false. Most gun violence does not occur from legal gun owners, or in places allowing concealed or overt carry.

No, most gun violence occurs with illegal guns by people committing crimes.

There is no realistic way for you or anyone to take away all of the illegal guns in America. Therefore, any proposed gun ban solely impacts legal gun owners - which statistically are not the problem. It sure sounds good though...
Assuming the cable is rated for the sudden force changes and won't get split into a whole bunch of smaller pieces that will drop at just their terminal velocities. Think a shower of cable pieces rather than a whip. Not great, but it's likely that most of the energy will be dissipated by the atmosphere.
Banking should be an essential service. There are obviously people who suffer from not having access or having it taken away.
Look, there's an obvious way to resolve this that will satisfy everyone. Simply pass a law first, then legally eat the rich.
I'm amazed that a proper sucessor to the bittorrent protocol never took off, especially during the blockchain craze where p2p was the future.

Anyway this means p2p is still a significant technical obstacle. If demand spikes, everyone is going to use bittorrent (which is easy to block/not anonymous) or proprietary trash like limewire.
I meant parent so I didn't imply a certain gender, but I've experienced it only twice in my 12 year career but I've only worked with newborn parents twice.
> But you're correct in that Tesla is using the same playbook on FSD as SpaceX

Except Tesla, unlike SpaceX, is willing to put passengers in its test vehicles. The SpaceX approach would be to let a bunch of FSD Teslas crash into things and each other before giving them payloads.
It wasn't "ablative dirt". It was a massive reinforced concrete pad that was pulverized and blown to kingdom come.
Yes this is correct, only the query's answer set need to be in memory. We are also working on streaming for the Rust API, in which case you don't even need to keep the whole set in memory for simple queries.

FYI here is a not very rigourous performance and memory usage analysis (for a previous version without the vector search capability): https://docs.cozodb.org/en/latest/releases/v0.3.html
That's not how credibility works. It is very easy to lose credibility but creating it is a long and arduous process. One credible brand tied to a noncredible brand leaves you with two noncredible brands.
Carrying that logic further, then, would it be better if public servants had no friends? If everyone anywhere but the lowest rung of the corporate ladder (from which one does not typically make hiring decisions) also had no family? For only the least (conventionally) successful to reproduce seems problematic.
I don't think so. About half of the programs (both new and old) I've worked with have used state machines, and I haven't noticed any long-term problems with them aside from the usual long-term problems with code generally.
If you cared to, you could download the entire US federal budget, NASA's budget, NASA's contracts with SSL, Boeing, SpaceX, etc. and all the ancillary data regarding milestones and results. You could, if you wanted, download more information that you might ever want about Blue Origin's contracts w/ the federal government. And SpaceX's contracts with the federal government.

Not everything is there, but enough to get a very decent picture of what's going on. Sometimes relevant information takes YEARS to be published.

But it's not easy to find. I've had to directly email people sometimes. Sometimes stuff is classified for no good reason other than someone thought at one point that a particular program was dual-use (commercial/military). Sometimes you DO have to file FOIA agreements.

I'm completely not coming down on anyone for not spending their time doing this. It takes a fair amount of time to piece things together from spreadsheets and contract addenda.

But it is possible.

What SpaceX does is they make it easy to see what they're doing. They upload videos to YouTube and Shotwell speaks at events and conferences from time to time. But you are getting their side of the story. Every now and again Casey Dreier over at the Planetary Society will dig up some previously difficult to find nugget of information about how various programs are being funded and exactly what they're being funded for. But Dreier's job is to focus more on planetary exploration missions rather than aerospace development, so I don't think he's focusing on SpaceX, SLS and Blue Origin.
> Also, why is it we never see a "reverse damage done for centuries to european and north american forests" NGO?

You'll never see if you never look!

https://www.rewildingbritain.org.uk/
> the simple idea of targets

That works very well for compiling C. But make is often abused for things that don't match that pattern at all, like a Python project when there are no intermediate targets and they are all .PHONY.
would you be open to chat via email? I'm also in Ontario Canada. Every time I breach this type of thing to a non-IT person, they say "oh, porn sites are all sex trafficking and exploitative work", which doesn't feel mathematically true. I'm not a journalist or anything, but would as personal curiosity love to hear an (ex-)operator's perspective :)
It's incredibly difficult to get people to walk away from Omelas - one has to choose it for themselves.
https://assets-c3.propublica.org/pdf/reports/2022-Annual-Rep...

Page 43:

- 5.8 million monthly page views

- 506,544 newsletter subscribers

Page 44:

- 2022 revenue $42 million

- Online donations $4.3 million

- The rest is grants and gifts

- Expenses $40.2

This is... not good at all.. it is basically a tiny blog that runs 90% on donations from a few rich people. I've seen single tweets with more views than what they get in a month, propublica sadly can't be sustainable for much longer I wouldn't think.

This subject has been giving me anxiety since about 2006. Nothing seems to stem the decline and I am scared what kind of world we will end up in soon as a result.
I tried to get ChatGPT to transform your post into only words of Latin origin but it could never quite get away from simpler common words that derive from Old English:

"Pertaining to inquiries concerning the categorization of English as a Germanic language, notwithstanding conspicuous French and Latin influences, such elucidates the rationale. An instance analogous to the aforementioned remains unachievable utilizing (approximately) 100% French/Latin terminology. The cognitional methodology's amassing and configuration remains intrinsically Germanic. In opposition, the Latinate stratum perseveres as an imported ornamentation, frequently insufficiently discerned via conventionally fluent recipients."
Good journalism will alway be in demand.

I personally like Breaking Points and I am happy to pay for it. [1]

You wont find good journalism in NYT and Washington Post anymore bc they have not figured out that high quality, subscriber-only content is more sustainable than advertising. You will increasingly find good journalism if you subscribe to individual journalists that are not beholden to their advertisers.

[1] https://breakingpoints.supercast.com/
Had no idea they went public.

https://www.google.com/finance/quote/BZFD:NASDAQ

The finance trend is going south. :-/
The basic problem is that they didn't provide a proper evolution for Win32. So yes, Win32 apps still "work" if you can tolerate tiny, non scaled 1995 era UI. If you want a modern looking UI that properly scales then they said rewrite it all in WPF. And then WinUI. And then JS/HTML. And then WinUI2. And then WinUI3. At no point was there a smooth upgrade path.

It's hard, really hard, so I don't really blame them for failing. But, Apple mostly managed it. AppKit/UIKit is pretty much a direct path from NeXTStep in the 1980s. 30+ years of evolution, without breaking the whole API until SwiftUI came along. Pretty impressive. Apple should get more credit for that.
This write-up is so bad. It’s almost like a caricature of bad takes. If I wanted to show someone an example of why journalists suck at their jobs, I think this would be exhibit A.

This rapid unscheduled disassembly was a huge success for SpaceX and everyone involved should be so proud. What a kick ass display of engineering prowess. That’s what the take should be, not “they tried to fly for an hour but it blew up after some minutes”.
But do you have any examples of how to do this? I am a pretty seasoned dev, but never trained a model before :)
Are those people hired to pilot their laptops?
> There won't be any other attempt this year

Possible, but not a sure bet by any means and one I'd happily take the other side of.
Government, in a democracy, is supposed to represent the choices of the people. They serve us. If they're not serving you, you are voting wrong.

If you vote for corrupt imbeciles because their sound bites align with some of your narrow interests, don't expect them stop being corrupt imbeciles when they are in power.
This still feels like a hit piece, designed to favor e.g. Meta et al against Tiktok.

While I have concerns about the above, I am MUCH more concerned that through this and Twitter's recent changes, we're slowly losing extremely valuable "alternative news sources." and that these are mostly a result of quiet socio-politcal interests, and not for many (or any) genuine concerns for safety (i.e. Facebook and Instagram will happily continue to push the exact same stuff if Tiktok and Twitter go down)
I agree with this assessment and probably the biggest problem in the test. After that, they still have a fair way to go on Raptor reliability; I was a bit disappointed with the number of engine outs: clearly the engines have not arrived. I think the big win of the day was the overall resilience of the vehicle. It seemed to handle (what looked to be) possibly explosive engine failures and kept going and stayed intact... even through the tumbling.

I think this is a case where the engineers can look at the numbers and calculate for a limited variety of well defined (and foreseen) scenarios, but that they continue to fail to have an intuitive sense of the power of the thing that they built. Given the complexity of the real world, they can "engineer" themselves into an undue sense of certainty about what will happen when they light a rocket of this power... and I think we see the result of that. As an aside, this is precisely where I think we'll some of the biggest failings for LLM based AI... it can get you some nice words to describe a situation and may be able to do all the calculations... but having that gut feeling that maybe there's more to a situation than the numbers would have you believe is still something that humans can do better (though not SpaceX this time around).

In closing, if I had a binary choice of "successful" or "unsuccessful" for this test... I'd still probably call it successful. But only just; it's a very qualified success given some of the test parameters SpaceX had set for themselves.

(of course we could find out about even more damage to "stage 0" which might shift my assessment... but we know that they're in the process of putting in a deluge system at least already, so I'm being a bit more charitable regarding expectations than I might otherwise be.)
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, Emacs/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Emacs plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Emacs system made useful by Emacs.

Many computer users run a modified version of the Emacs system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of Emacs which is widely used today is often called Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the Emacs system, developed by the Emacs Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the Emacs operating system: the whole system is basically Emacs with Linux added, or Emacs/Linux. All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of Emacs/Linux!
So sad and mopey people keep watching sad and mopey shit and keep making themselves more depressed.

Good stuff.

[thisisfine.jpg]
Ideally you shouldn't be looking at the actual contents of your passwords! All my passwords are long and, apart from my password manager which requires my devices and 2fa token, I won't log into any of them by typing a password.
Imaging journal editors resign over ‘extreme’ open-access fees
Maybe. The catch-22 of this is that subscription models more-or-less can't work while ad-based business models exist. If someone can profit by taking your paywalled content, slapping ads on it, and putting that up on a free site, then someone will do that, destroying your business model.

We need to destroy ads as a viable business model before we can even try exploring other models. Installing an ad blocker is ethical.
Thinking about this a little more, that was the longest duration burn with all engines. I imagine it's a bit like water behind a dam, a small leak very quick grows into a catastrophic failure.

A small fault in the concrete slab grew into a catastrophic blow out. I worry about the integrity of the massive concrete piles they put in.
To the extent that an elevator would represent both the power and interests of whatever rich entity had managed to construct it, it would be a target for those who want to reduce the power and harm the interests of that entity.
> What could they possibly have demonstrated and how?

Affiliation with an intelligence agency, who tell the petty beat cops to turn around and mind their own business. Probably more or less the same way that BATFE agents pretending to coyly sell illegal machine guns turn away any regular cop who might wander into the fishing expedition. With phone calls to police chiefs I imagine.
We're assuming in this scenario that your memory is still basically functional, so the math on a sheet of paper won't be replaced suddenly without you noticing.

If you can't even remember things in the medium term that's a level beyond "trapped in a dream" that's much more hopeless.

So, with that assumption, you make a computer solve a problem that's impossible for a human to work through in a practical amount of time. And then you verify it got the right answer. This proves the math wasn't done by your dreaming brain. (At least it proves it to a pretty good certainty, and you can repeat the test.)

Many NP-complete problems are good candidates here for slow solutions and fast verifications.
Finally, I get to write my init scripts in Emacs Lisp!
Sad but true.

Ironic hotbed of so much technological innovation (but then $$$ is a strong motivator).
The tabloid gossip and listicles paid the bills for the journalism.

Plus they would still have the problem where people see "Buzzfeed" and immediately turn away because they have a preconceived notion of what kind of content they produce.
Writable replicas for Postgres
When read replicas don't give you the functionality you need, try using Logical Replication.
CNN America shows the most ridiculous rage-bait every hour, on the hour. But CNN International (airing in non-American markets) is significantly more toned down because it tries to compete with BBC News, France24 and NHK.

Maybe Tiktok is just trying to give the market what it wants? Idiotic stunts were going viral years before TikTok existed.
That's pretty cool and interesting, I wonder how it would know credit card statement lines items or if that's in training data. Do you have an example of a cryptic item, like how is it totally unrelated to the purchase