skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Full-Fat Yogurt Helps Lower Glucose Levels in People with Prediabetes
Why sadly?

If the corporation who owns the original IP, abandoned it for 10+ years with no way of legitimately buying it from them, then it means they don't want our money and they don't care about it, so it's fair game.

I'm doing my part.
Incredible that a site about design, interfaces and usability looks like a geocities page from the 90's. If the author is reading this page, sorry but someone had to tell you this.
Thanks for your kind words! Yes many teams struggle with that (and I have in the past) and the essence of ur mission is to allow dev teams to focus on progressing on their roadmap and goals instead of wrestling with tests.

Feel free to sign up for a demo if that's a priority for your team. Even if it's just to chat and connect.
Well that was a trip.

I asked StableLM-Tuned-Alpha-7b to translate the Swedish phrase "Skaplig bögpulka” into English (because ChatGPT and New Bing refuse to do so as a result of their puritannical US censorship) and it confabulated wildly.

It made up an Estonian folk song and somehow we ended up on the etymology of the well-known Swedish word "Skeletor".

This one is not ready for prime-time, but I have hopes. Someone please make a model that doesn't censor. I won't be paying one thin dime for this stuff until it is censorship-free.
Previously, Google displayed the relevant 3rd party links (or, paid links), and Google didn't take responsibility for the content.

This clear boundary was blurred once google started auto-summarizing results with some sort of knowledge panel, which was frequently wrong. Google 1st party data has more weight & liability to it than a link to 3rd party sites.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/10-months...
https://www.vox.com/recode/22550555/google-search-knowledge-...
https://www.executiveprivacy.com/resources/when-google-gets-...

Already these AI searches provide fatal advice (suggesting 40+ mile hiking days in the desert, lying about the distance between water sources & campsites), this example about the plane, inaccurate dosage of substances, etc. Essentially, any time there's a number that can be wrong with a serious outcome, these services will bullshit the number with disastrous consequences. And there's no 3rd party to hide behind now. There's no 'just a link' - a trillion dollar corporation is directly responsible for these results.

Sort of like manual-driven-cars vs self-driving-cars, removing the millions of small 3rd parties could change who is responsible for the outcome. Rushing these out could be setting the stage for the next tobacco / opioid / talc lawsuits.
Why are you looking to move from SuperTokens? -cofounder here
Next.js pseudo-alternatives are usually subpar, because they misunderstand Next.js approach and implement a very simplified vision of it (eg they can't even tell the difference between client-side rendered SPA and HTML export).
This one doesn't seem to fall in this trap, from the documentation it seems a very well thought library. Great work!
The word is of Scots origin, apparently.
I believe the parent is referring to deleted content, not literal unintended data loss.
They are licensed: https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/shutterstock-teams-with-n...
I think in the ones that researched that, they could claim people become more efficient.

But that's not the same as reducing headcount.
This is mostly why the future of computation only makes sense monetarily if you have everyone shift to a thin client. So, banning GPUs is likely considered a "necessary evil" by the BigTech cognoscenti for accomplishing that goal.
There’s actually a few papers already on constrained decoding. I won’t link them but if you go on arxiv and really look you will find a couple in the past year.
Are non destructive layers a thing yet?
Arguably offers more compelling features than Twitter.
I did the same thing to implement an automatic differentiation engine in my programming languages project. I’ve been mulling over the idea for months, but I was a little unsure how to do it. Sat down with chatgpt and we got it done mostly in an afternoon. I’m so stoked about the future of coding.
How is this sort of thing audited? I imagine there are all sorts of lifestyle AI businesses that won't give two shits about a license where people can't easily see or audit what is being used.
Does it really matter if it hasn't gone through any testing? Have we forgotten about the Covid shot not going through any trials? We have people dropping dead left and right due Narcan not reversing the effects. The FDA NEEDS to come up with something that acts both like Narcan and Atipamezole, so we can start saving lives!
Nice! I've been wondering similar things about whether you could use this to eek out more intelligence through methods like these, to quote the end of my write up:

> Does structured decoding increase the observability of emergent world models in these models? To make an analogy: I may not represent an opinion of how something works if I am not confident in it, but if I am forced to present an opinion we might find out that I in fact have (or have not) grasped something.

In practice, however, without tight integration with beam search, the autoregressive nature of these models means that the syntactic steering may result in the models rabbit-holing themselves without forward looking visibility that's obvious from the defined grammar. I.e. if it was forced to choose between "Don't Jump" and "Do run" in some hypothetical example, the set of tokens that it would likely be deciding between is "Don't" and "Do" with no idea what is going to end up syntactically required after those tokens.
So you're not going to edit your original comment?
Not sure what you're claiming here:

> And it ended similar: nationalist troops killed the people [...] though it was much worse in East Central Europe: Polish-Soviet War, Ukrainian War of Independence

The Polish-Soviet War was not a war of "nationalists killing the people". It was a war to prevent the spread of communism and Soviet imperialism. Not only did Poles by and large reject communism (communist sympathy was higher in Germany, for example), and Soviet communism even more so, but Lenin saw Poland as the corridor through which the Red Army would need to pass to support revolution further West.
Suddenly, Richard Stallman's lifestyle doesn't seem so crazy.
It's an experimental amateur-built aircraft. The builder gets to do nearly anything they want to do (usually) even if it's a bad idea, and most of them have minor changes from the original plans.

The design change was possibly an improvement when the only user was the builder who was intimately familiar with its design, but ended up being a disaster when someone else tried to use it under stress.
If the Bloomberg article[0] about them is to be believed, I don't think they're interested in being acquired

[0]: https://archive.is/WeAEV
Discover React Server: React Components on the Back End
I'm sure all of those VHS tapes are still perfectly viewable today!
I think the new design at https://sh.reddit.com/ (for desktop PC) is aimed at this. It's supposed to be better performant than the current design and dealing with criticized decisions like the heavy layered design, but I think another way to view it is that it's supposed to finally kill old.reddit.com once released, probably in a year or so.
>It's an old citation but here's the snippet:

Really old citation, 1995...

>There was an article a couple of years ago about taking binaries from either windows 1...

The below article seems to go more indepth and was written in 2020, might even be the one you were thinking of:

https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=20/05/10/1753203

>As previously noted, Windows 95 dropped support for 1.x and 2.x binaries. The same however was not true for Windows NT, which modern versions of Windows are based upon. However, running 16-bit applications is complicated by the fact that NTVDM is not available on 64-bit installations.

>After letting NTVDM install, a second attempt shows, yes, it is possible to run Windows 1.x applications on Windows 10 [32-bit].

>FONTTEST also worked without issue, although the TrueType fonts from Windows 3.1 had disappeared.
Why should I have to avoid common priors? An intelligent system should be able to disassociate and work with the logic puzzle in an isolated fashion, especially after directed to ignore the TV show.

That GPTs are easily fooled is nothing new. But there's a current hype phase for them that I think is excessive, and this example underscores that.
That's not perfectionism, that's something else. Building out menu systems before you even have the core game loop locked down is basically like building out a house before you know on which plot of land it should be built.
Oh interesting, I will give that a shot too.
Is this guy really that idiotic? I mean he must realize chatGPT and encryption have nothing to do with one another. That's one thing.

Plus child sexual abuse goes mostly undetected, when repeatedly reported, to multiple authorities (police, CPS, school, council, ...). Why? Such centers to detect child abuse, and "help" of various kinds, very much already exist ... that's CPS ... and they have a reputation for their "help" hurting children far more than abuse does. What has been done to solve that problem? Nothing, of course.

And, obviously, without solving that problem, that help hurts children and their futures much more than the problem they're trying to solve ... without solving that problem first this center the EU is creating is somewhere between useless and outright malevolent. They will face opposition in any concrete case, by EVERYONE. By the abuser, obviously, but also by the child, the parents, and anyone around them. What exactly do they hope to accomplish in such circumstances?

The child knows, or will rapidly learn, CPS "help" will destroy their lives and futures.

Parents know CPS will take away their child JUST to "not miss anything".

Schools/sports clubs/... will know that if this comes out and it turns out to happen at/near/... school or involving their people, it will really hurt them.

This center, like CPS, will be a weapon against children, not against CSAM.

This guy, this law, is really going to hurt people, and hurt children. Can't he see that? This effectively sets a trap. A trap that, criminals will be aware of and not fall into. Why? If you fall into this trap, you will not be heavily punished, because if the trap works, it will prevent a crime from occurring, hence no serious punishment can be applied. This means predators can easily make repeated attempts, making this easy to bypass.

But kids/minors will fall into this trap. And, of course, people like doctors, parents, schools, sports clubs, youth clubs, ... they will all fall into his trap, and at minimum see the police show up on their doorstep. But ... this can't really be used to go after predators, that's just not practical.

How much do you want to bet that the police will rapidly switch enforcement of this to placing the children involved out of their home (and thereby destroying their future). Because going after the predator won't work: they haven't done anything serious, and they can pay for a lawyer. "Protecting" the child, meaning locking the child up, which obviously will not be with cooperation from the child in question, they can do without even having to see a judge in most places. This will do enormous damage, traumatize the child, preventing them from going to school, disrupting their entire lives ... including INCREASING the odds of child sexual abuse.

The cynic in me now goes "of course police/authorities/CPS/... want exactly such a trap to catch innocents". Much easier to go after children who can't defend themselves for imagined problems, and it pays the same as going after criminals that hide, lie, are competent and defend themselves in court. So of course they go after children with laws like this.
Well, the emergent abilities of LLMs keep surprising me.

I've yet to try it, but apparently if you do something like this with GPT-4:

compress_prompt = "Compressor: compress the following text in a way that
fits in a tweet (ideally) and such that you (GPT-4) can reconstruct
the intention of the human who wrote text as close as possible to the
original intention. This is for yourself. It does not need to be human
readable or understandable. Abuse of language mixing, abbreviations,
symbols (unicode and emoji), or any other encodings or internal
representations is all permissible, as long as it, if pasted in a new
inference cycle, will yield near-identical results as the original text:
\n\n"

long_text = "[your long string goes here]"

shorter_text = LLM(compress_prompt + long_text)

then you can use `shorter_text` as a drop-in-replacement for `long_text` as context, using up fewer tokens, in a new query.

If that's true, I find it wild.
It's not perfectionism that prevents people from reaching what's, by reasonable standards, a finish line. It's a failure to prioritize.

It's perfectionism that prevents people from shipping what's by reasonable standards already past the finish line, because they keep redoing and polishing "good enough" things, ad infinitum.

Perfectionism can be a good thing producing exceptional quality results, provided you've prioritized appropriately and are playing "perfectionist" iterating in diminishing returns land.

With or without perfectionism, if you can't prioritize correctly, you'll likely fail to finish.

Perfectionism causes people to over-finish and endlessly defer shipping.
Sure if you like to write XML by hand.

Cambalache is years away to reach feature parity with Glade. Then there is the whole of using Web to render the designer.
Great point! We are constantly discussing the criteria. For example, if a robot lost power and fell on someone, do you think that is an incident? What if the robot was never turned on and fell on someone in shipping? When these challenges come up, we try to expand the editing guide to meet the challenge of all the ways intelligence of the artificial variety can go wrong.
This is good fun
How does your service handle this issue?

https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=35628748&goto=item%3Fi...
The point of the parent comment is that, if the copyright people had their way, VCRs and the like would be irrelevant, because they would make it so that you _couldn't_ back up media. It's a pattern that keeps repeating itself. Copyright owners with deep enough pockets try to build "anti-piracy" technical measures which actually just prevent people from backing up their media, while piracy continues unabated regardless of those technical hurdles that impact 99% of people.
You've gotta do the slack-style growth strategy. Give users a free tier and market directly to end users. Let your users ignore their own company policy for their own convenience. Eventually they will end up dependent enough on it that their organizations will be forced to accept it.
Sadly; because a noble pursuit has been reduced to literal crime...
Microsoft drops Twitter from its advertising platform
The simple way is paying $9.99/month for 2TB of iCloud space and put your Time Machine backups there.

Home labbing can be fun and a good way to learn, but if you are just trying to back up your files you cannot beat the economies of scale and reliability of cloud providers.
> Ever heard of 40's/50's golden era of the comic books, with progressive (for its day) themes?

You mean the ones written by old straight white men? No thank you!

> how would the world know that racism/sexism was a reality?

They'd learn it in their DEI classes in both school and work.
Link doesn't match description, actually links to "How to Crash SM64 Using a Pendulum (Commentated)"
Also, they're treating industrial robots as an AI:

https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/24/

> A 22-year-old worker at a Volkswagen plant was "crushed to death" by a robotic arm. The worker was inside the "safety cage", meant to separate humans from the machines, to install a piece of the robot when an arm struck him, pinning him to a metal plate. He was resuscitated, however he died later at the hospital. Volkswagen is citing human error as the cause of the accident.

https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/30/

> The goal of manufacturing 2,500 Tesla Model 3's per week was falling short by 500 cars/week, and employees had to be "borrowed" from Panasonic in a shared factory to help hand-assemble lithium batteries for Tesla. This output at assembly factories has led CEO/Founder Elon Musk to revisit the management and hiring strategies of the company.

That one also is more like a poor strategic choice/execution than an incident.
Twitter is equally awful. I wish I understood the commercial reasons for having such bad UIs, especially when the UI has been better in the past. Is it just bad statistics, or are these terrible UIs actually increasing revenue/profit?
FBI and others urge Meta to halt encryption plans, citing child abuse risk
> Is it?

Yes

> And the source for that claim is?

Prices on Amazon for even non-bulk purchases of batteries and PV. Even cheaper elsewhere.

> You're trying to confuse fuel requirements with grid storage requirements.

False.

I'm giving an analogy.

Uranium mines have a production rate.

Battery factories have a production rate.

Both are presently insufficient to be be 100% of global power.

This doesn't matter in either case.

> It's that emotionally charged magical thinking again. If we pretend that problems don't exist, they don't exist.

???

My emotion in this case is "boredom".

Boring is good. Nobody wants civil infrastructure to be exciting. Exciting is bad.

And AFAICT nobody is denying that e.g. PV needs sunlight. What we're doing is giving you the very solutions you're saying don't exist, even though you're almost certainly holding an example of it in your hand right now while reacting emotionally to the suggestion that there are other solutions besides nuclear.

> What does electric transport have to do with an absolute requirement for renewable energy sources to be backed up with grid-scale energy sources?

55kWh per car * number of cars >> multiple day energy use per person * number of people

> is extremely slow to ramp up

???

Newly installed nameplate capacity for PV last year is 286 GW. Even accounting for 10% capacity factor, that's quite nice. Then there's wind.
Awesome idea! Excited to see where this goes
Collaborators are already working to provide data labels to all incidents that would support this particular filter. Many filters are available here: https://incidentdatabase.ai/apps/discover/?display=details&i...
:- use_module(library(clpfd)).

rle([], []).
rle([H],[[H, 1]]).
rle([H | T], [[H, CountPlus1] | More]) :-
Count #> 0,
CountPlus1 #= Count+1,
rle(T, [[H, Count] | More]).
rle([H | T], [[H, 1], [Element, Count] | More]) :-
Count #> 0,
dif(Element, H),
rle(T, [[Element, Count] | More]).

Even though I'm the one who was making the execution model complaint, this implementation seems to work for me.

?- rle([1,1,1,2,3,1,1],X), rle(Y, X).
X = [[1, 3], [2, 1], [3, 1], [1, 2]],
Y = [1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 1, 1] ;
false.
Stoker's widow won a lawsuit and all of the copies of Nosferatu were destroyed. Well, all but one. Every copy today has that source, that accidental source, as its ancestor.

"Bothering to preserve" is a terribly blunt filter. Luck (good: a crazed archivist; bad: a nitrate fire) is too fickle to select for the best.

It isn't just the films themselves: often, we have no sense of a given actor's career. We know that they had a huge impact at the time, but we have only secondhand evidence of it.
That's true. I missed that they said microcontroller and not just embedded system.

However, there is also GRiSP: https://www.grisp.org/
Genuine question, how is giving even more (hyper)local control gonna solve it? This is the exact breeding ground for NIMBYism and the like. The author doesn't really present an argument in favor of that, just sort of drops it as an assertion in the end with a CYA "but yea maybe I'm wrong".
Is this a joke? There's already not enough housing.
Lets focus on the Boston Dynamics turbo ninja robot cats jumping through windows and bouncing off the walls with machine guns, lasers, and fully autonomous AI.
Even this can differ depending on the hardware and I think possibly driver versions IIRC.

The stable diffusion crowd has ran into this issue.
it is true that there are concerns relating to open source and ai, but surely the having them be closed off, manipulated and controlled untrustworthy corporations is worse.
let me know if you want to connect directly adam.brauer@frontegg.com
The Big Mystique (2017)
Agreed, and I also hate a11y for “accessibility” as I think it is quite inaccessible when you first come across it and really it only exists because the writer can’t remember the number of c and s letters.
Although possible, this is not happening to them frequently. The language hasn't optimized for that use case.
So what's the solution to deserialization?

He mentioned the Even class, but there didn't seem to be anything that looked to fix the lack of validation when reading from JSON?

If it's out of scope, why bring it up without mentioning further work (or am I missing something)?
https://archive.is/S1Pj2
Disney Is Set to Eliminate Thousands of Jobs Starting Next Week
My "favourite" one of those weird abbreviations is a11y, because rather ironically it's bad for screen readers.
This title is confusing due to the automatic removal of "How".
Should be "How physics advanced generative AI".
The earlier incidents like the Pokémon Go one were sourced from several existing collections: https://incidentdatabase.ai/research/2-roadmap/#:~:text=init.... That was before I or our most active current editor were on the project. The ChatGPT ones are more recent and did go through review.
It’s crazy how many newer UI toolkits (including those by giants like Microsoft) don’t even have a tableview/datagrid widget, which is one of the most common desktop widgets right after buttons. You’re expected to haul in some third party widget that’s half-baked and lacks battle testing or roll your own, which is ridiculous and a massive productivity + UX killer.
I wonder if that means we are currently in the golden age of AI Art
When a model gives back false information, does it continue to try to back it up on subsequent prompts? Essentially: can it weave a web of lies or will it course correct at some point?

Not sure why I’m downvoted, it seems like a valid question…
1.Do you have any clients? A. No, since besides making sure we can build it we havnt done any further research/work. 2.Can you demonstrate demand? A.Since I have direct domain knowledge in that area, so absolutely Yes. 3.Can you articulate a clear problem that others agree exists and a clear solution? A. absolutely Yes. 4.Are you sure you need investors? A. yes, to scale it from MVP to full blown product we would need more people. 5.What will you use their money for that is worth giving up a likely substantial preferential position? A. to be able to afford resources needed to scale up from MVP. Its possible there are ways to go about it ourselves by directly talking to clients. But since we never had any exposure to sales/marketing/fund raising etc we would appreciate if you know great online links or have your own advice on those topics.
Native language shapes brain wiring
I mostly agree with your point but I would say the exception is when the success of the company is closely tied to their security practices or their security features are their business. Okta being a good example, when it took a 10% drop after the breach last year.