skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
PR blitz because it's going to look good to investors. Google is killing the vanity projects and moonshots and rolling those resources into teams that aim to launch products in the next 6-12 months.
It does:

https://github.com/emacs-evil/evil
It's not about the content, it's about the restrictions to a dogma
> The claim was very specific: Prove this data isn't from the 2020 election. All you had to do was actually include 2020 election data in the set. And right there, the problem becomes much harder.

The core of the arbitration decision is that "election data" specifically meant "packet captures of machines related to the election," relying on the fact that pretty much everyone (sans Lindell) understood that that was the kind of data they expected to have. Lindell instead had a tactic of relying on him being the ultimate arbiter of what satisfied "election data" as an ultimate get-out-of-jail-free card (which likely could have run afoul of other good-faith laws, although arbitration didn't analyze that point because they didn't need to go that far).
but then the US would have to ban twitter and FB/Insta.

IT would be better to have an enforceable set of licensing. But that wont happen because 1st amendment noises (rightly or wrongly. I'm not sure that corporations should really be treated as humans in this instance, but US case law thinks it should since the 70s.)
Yes, those papers were very informative. Also the iAPX 432 patents have a lot of detail: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4325120A
https://patents.google.com/patent/US4367524
https://patents.google.com/patent/US4415969
I wonder how much of the mainland static about Taiwan is really about seizing TSMC in particular. It represents too many global IP and fab eggs.
Aren't there some distributed, peer-to-peer networks that could be used for this purpose?
Disclaimer: I live in The Netherlands.

My high-school friend was killed on holiday shortly after takeoff when a Buk 9M38 surface-to-air missile shot the plane down, killing 196 Dutch civilians.

A famous crime reporter got shot in the street for covering a story about a high ranking drug lord.

A news outlet got shot with a bazooka.

So lets do some statistics:

How many American civilians in the past 10 years have been killed with a surface-to-air-missle, adjusted for population? Zero. 196 for The Netherlands.

How many crime reporters got killed in that period? Five for the US, two for The Netherlands.

How many news outlets got shot with a bazooka? I can't find any, but please correct me. One in The Netherlands.

The thing with statistics is. You can make up anything you want to frame a certain view.
Thanks for sharing, i read a lot of history and while I was generally aware of the western sacking of Constantinople during the crusades.. I wasn’t aware this preceded it.
one random tidbit that struck me was that the term "Byzantine Empire" was actually an invention from the 1500's.

the "byzantine" people actually called themselves Romans, and the empire was called "Roman Empire".
Not going to help so much - probably the biggest reason Google didn't launch its own ChatGPT first was because it was protecting its search and ads business and not wanting to upset the order that underpinned its revenues.
Accelerating AI development and improving safety are inherently contradictory. It's pretty annoying and disingenuous when someone says "this move will speed us up and make us safer".
Absolutely, I do believe that SpaceX going public will largely be the death of that company. And, depending on when this happens, it could even herald the second death of space in America. The one thing that's good here is that Elon has stated that he will not be taking SpaceX public until transit between Earth and Mars is well established.

The point I'd make is that leadership really matters. Boeing, at its peak, almost certainly had orders of magnitude more talent than SpaceX did in its early years - in no small part because of what you mentioned. And they absolutely had many orders of magnitude more money and access to funding. But their leadership was just absolutely abysmal, and consequently the potential of that talent was left completely untapped.

But on the other hand, like you mentioned there are incentive problems. Even though Boeing failed to tap into their potential, their stock price has been constantly and steadily going up for decades. Even their planes literally falling out of the skies was but a brief stumble, the damage there largely repaired owing to the start of a profitable new war. So in this regard I doubt their leadership is particularly disappointed with their results. They achieved what they set out to do after all. And that's pretty disappointing.
Great use case. I have successfully used it in a similar way with SRT files (recording transcripts in SubRip Subtitle format) as well as CSV data from surveys that often has many columns with long text labels (the survey questions) and free text answers.

Ex. a prompt I had used for a developer skills survey .csv was:

> The CSV data below is the results of a skills survey sent to a group of software engineers. The first row is a header row. Please summarize this data in the areas that the People are Strong, Weak, Most Similar, and Unique:

Then, because of things I saw in the response, I asked a few follow-up questions:

> How much Azure experience is there in the group?

> Can you provide more explanation around your assessment that "Engineers generally have little to no experience with Dockers and Kubernetes."

> What other skills and experience do you see in the results that you haven't already mentioned?

To address my risk tolerance vis-a-vis the ChatGPT warnings (and previous UI leak of responses), I replaced the email addresses in the .csv file with "PersonA", "PersonB", ...
Literally nobody's suggesting this is done intentionally. Not the article, and not in any comments here.

So why even bring it up? It's completely disingenuous imho.
Only in America, the most puritan developed nation.
I'm absolutely horrified by people's willingness to submit private information (personal or corporate) even if it's not used for training. Data breaches happen all the time (targeted or accidental), and OpenAI is becoming a juicier target by the day.

You're right that OpenAI doesn't want the information. Consequently, OpenAI will not have security policies and processes geared for anonymization, or handling financial and health data as those are not a design goals. If I were an attacker, I'd go for the raw data rather than try to glean information off the model (in the hypothetical where user input were to be used for training)
Oh interesting, I wasn't aware! Thanks for sharing.
Law enforcements could force Mullvad to start logging some specific account if they manage to indentify the account.

Service might not collect data but they could be forced with warrant to start doing so for specific entities.

This has happened in Finland, for example.
It's completely broken if you don't have JavaScript enabled, for starters.
The whole point of the fine is punishment. Seagate will have a stronger financial motive to comply with the law. If it's cheaper to risk getting caught and paying a small fine, there's much less incentive not to break the law.
Inventing transformers may prove to be Google's undoing. Being a research paper factory doesn't seem to be good for shareholders.
Hit the gym? Lol.
> I still haven't found a 100% reliable way of getting a LLM to always produce results in JSON for example.

Have you tried Guardrails?

https://github.com/ShreyaR/guardrails
GPT4 killed our little startup
We're shutting down CrowdPrisma, a bootstrapped applied AI company that was formed two years ago by my friend and I (both ML engineers) to solve free-text survey analysis. A ton of really important information can only be gathered by open-ended surveys and as NLP models were maturing it seemed like a nice and relatively niche market to go after.

I think we had a unique value proposition as our NLP engine was fairly sophisticated and we also integrated its output nicely with other non-text variables (check our demo on the site).

Getting significant business traction was difficult (for reasons which would warrant its own blog post), but now with GPT4, Office Copilot, etc coming online it'll be near impossible.

We learned a ton from the experience and wouldn't change one bit, but I do wonder, how many other companies must be out there like us..

Although it might seem like there's a generative AI startup frenzy going on atm (which is great), I do have the suspicion that in most domains, large tech companies will dominate the market, due to several reasons (another blog post maybe).. Will see.. anyways, interesting times ahead..
> Demis now has a load of people reporting to him who previously were rooting for his failure

Having been in both places (Brain and DM), this feels so far from what I experienced that I must ask, what are you basing this on?
Refactoring for directors.
Read more carefully. The constitutional mandate for state legislators to select senators was a compromise to placate slave owners.

Electing Senators directly took a long time to move forward because constitutional amendments are hard. Senatorial elections are statewide events, they are the only federal elected officials elected by the people of a state free of gerrymandering.
Absolutely, but I've seen much better results on verified FB Pages.
it is possible to resurect a dead torrent, you need, a copy of the original file[s] in the torrent, and duplication of the original directory path.
Hyperbole title by a bitter researcher.
Know more about AutoGPT? Try OSSChat
OSSChat is a ChatGPT and Vector database enhanced chatbot about open source software.
Now we support AutoGPT!
Perhaps someday we can have a realtime filter from corporate crap style to 80s hacker style, perhaps using stable diffusion.
The first sentence is true, the last one is trolling.
It took Google 4.5 months just to name their response to ChatGPT/Bing.
> Realistically, your argument isn't to lessen trauma, but to simply normalize it. Which is exactly what American culture already does

No, actually, my argument is that killing or injuring a person in self-defense is less traumatic than being helpless while getting assaulted.

Besides, trauma is relative - "normalizing" trauma is another way of saying "being desensitised" - which is exactly the process therapy itself employs to help people relieve the effects of it.
In the other hand regular running (w/o stretching) has fixed all my back pain.
>Because they knew they had to "get it right" the first time because a bunch of buffoons(congress) would consider any crash or explosion as a failure and pull funds immediately.

That’s not the way the CCP contracting works.
As far as typos go, this one has been very informative :)
This feels like a very American-centric perspective, this happened in Sweden.

For a bunch of reasons policing outside the US is very different to policing in the US.
How about the possibility that this is Sweden with a different set of priorities, an underlying crime that's relatively petty, and a prosecutor that is mostly disinterested in the case but had to at least pretend to make an effort?
I think the idea is that neurodivergent people tend to have a lot of really damaging, highly ingrained thought patterns as a result of their time before being properly treated. Unwinding some of those might make you more effective both with and without medication -- although that's not to say medication would not continue to be useful.
Just remember that being best doesn't matter... being 'good enough' is.

McD's never tried to build the best burger, they built one of the best supply chains in the world.

SpaceX doesn't have to build the best rocket, in whatever that means, it just needs not to blow up and allow its cargo to reach space.

If you build lots or burgers or lots of rockets its highly likely you'll reach and pass 'good enough'.
What do you mean? The attention based transformer architecture was created by Google. AlphaFold took the biotech world by storm. Tensorflow is significant platform for AI developers. Chinchilla pioneered new method to improve LLM.

"Just publishing paper" is such an ignorant and dismissive attitude to one of the most significant contributors to AI development in the world. Without Google research and publication, OpenAI would not have the foundation to build its GPT to the current level.
define the "algorithm"

all it does is offer you choices of things that people generally react to. Its a window to your desires/hates.

Now, if you are taught that you are allowed to "long press/right click" and say "I don't like this" then your life gets much better.

Does that mean that they shouldn't have a duty of care to their customers? no.

Does that mean that they don't have a responsibility to keep a high standard of safe/good/clean content on their platform? no.
There are resolutely principled people of all kinds.
At least mhos and megacycles are unambiguous, unlike S or T.
>freudian psychoanalysis defines social sins that need to be corrected by supposedly scientific beliefs

A Freudian analyst would never proscribed certain behaviors for their patients, but would perhaps advise them to find ways to keep themselves out of trouble. If we lived in a society where it was acceptable to challenge your enemies in single combat to the death (like virtually all societies in the west before the 20th century) then an analyst would probably tell their patient that they should just be careful and make sure that it was a decision the patient made with a full, conscious understanding of the repercussions. Every society has acceptable and unacceptable forms of violence, which becomes all the more clear during times of war, when virtually all violent means become socially acceptable against the enemy.

Also,

>Where as psychiatry deals with the chemistry and biology of the brain with respect to undesirable behavior. still, the politics of the day decides what is a sickness but with psychiatry you have to prove some chemistry or makeup of the brain is responsible while with freud's psychoanalysis it is a belief which is conscious or subconscious that needs to be washed out if your brain.

there is no "conscious or subconscious" beliefs for Freud, there is only the conscious and the unconscious, which are precisely that which we are actively aware of, and that which we are not aware, in the cognitive processes of the mind. What someone says the believe is a lot less important than what they say about their belief, and what sort of structural orderings they are applying (in language) that reveal how they understand the world around them. And,

>with psychiatry you have to prove some chemistry or makeup of the brain

I think you are giving Psychiatry far too much credit. You should know Freud was the first person to attempt to create a physical model of the psyche, and he utterly failed, which is why he developed psychoanalysis (cf. Project for a Scientific Psychology). And to this day not only is he credited as being the father of modern psychiatry for that reason, virtually no progress has been made since his work.
This wasn't illegal already if you were a good impersonator provided you're not making money from someone's image and likeness. There's no difference here. I'm not saying there won't be lawsuits but they'll be in bad faith.
Well it's all quantum mechanics and so are we, except maybe gravity, so looking at things that way isn't a helpful way to classify reality.
The startup sequence is indeed longer than with most other rockets, but I don’t think that’s the reason.

5-6 engines were gone since very early in the flight, and for most of those I suspect that’s because they were damaged by debris from the pad. Everyday Astronaut’s live stream had a different camera angle on the rocket, and you could see it actually slide sideways away from the tower a bit in the first few seconds. Uneven thrust would explain that.

Elon said in the past that the rocket will leap off the pad (thrust-to-weight ratio of 1.5 or 1.6 iirc). But if you’re missing 20% of your engines, that ratio is ~1.2, or less than half the expected acceleration. A slow start indeed.
This implies we value trees and wildlife more than humans.
> This announcement either means the AI outside of Demis' team has been neutered, or they're lining Demis up to be the scape goat for missing AI.

I read that to mean the party is over, we are treating that as a strategic subject and are streamlining our organisation. As you rightfully pointed Google basically had two competing organisations with all the complexity associated with that. That’s now over. From now on, there is only one captain steering the ship.
I wonder if indicating likeness would be legally safe, i.e., “Song name - Artist [Drake-like/Drake-style]”
Meta just copies. Reels (videos!) on instagram (a photo app!) is a straight up copy of tiktok with the vast majority of videos on it just copies or resubmissions of videos originating on tiktok.
Google Mind or Deep Brain?
Oh. This is not a list of services available for £0.09; my mistake. Cheerio.
Interesting project…thanks for sharing.
"Give you more videos you wanted to watch in the first place" is hardly a negligence.

In case of alcohol, sure I can see it but that is not exactly comparable. Enough alcohol will kill you 100% of the time, this aint even close.

that being said some content warning or a bit of push to seek help wouldn't be a bad idea when someone gets stuck in some topic like that
Google, did you really just copy OpenAI's website layout [1]?

Google isn't the leader anymore.

-_____-

[1] https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt
I like the logic of that. Corporations were originally given limited liability in return for doing a public good.

If they are doing something illegal - the opposite of a public good - then they broke the deal, so those who broke the law don't get limited liability.
Hah! Good catch. I doubt that was unintentional. Demis doesn't sound too pleased about having his merry band of misfits sucked into the mothership.
I'm not sure why people need to be reminded of this. This isn't a reply to anyone making complaining about the lack of success. It comes off as fanboyism.
Apologies for the confusion. We meant to link to our main readme: https://github.com/highlight/highlight/blob/main/README.md
Despite ~60 years of updates, the fortran language still isn't case sensitive.
Why not pursue customers first?
Jupyter?
I'm worried that OpenAI has started a trend of these AI companies being a lot more secretive about their research in the future. I mean basically OpenAI took Deepmind's/Google's public research on transformers and ran with it, not publishing back the results of improving it.

This probably sent a bad message with consequences for the whole public research field.
It's a giant shaking and trembling structure built in a fail-fast iterative manner using unexpected materials (stainless steel) and processes (regular welding). Assemble all this in history's largest rocket ever, and expect everything to go perfect the first time?

I wouldn't have been surprised if the whole thing shook itself apart on the lift pad and blew up.

I don't know about you, but when I rapidly build and assemble large complex structures like a cowboy, I certainly expect a ton of failures on my first trials. When stuff goes much further than I expected, I'm in awe and disbelief.
¿Por qué no los dos?

Plus accidents are more likely than you think. A rocket just exploded this morning, and read up on rates of railroad or shipping screwups. A train full of apples and pallets of kleenex going over ain't a big deal but the same containers falling out of the sky will certainly cause more damage.
Do you have any prior knowledge of these teams? They weren't working against each other. One group focused on research and the other focused on products.
And it puts a suit on for you if you don't select one. No stickman snuff animations here.
It's perfectly possible to ban TikTok without making something like the RESTRICT act, which for once is aptly named.
Bingo. This feels like Google is _trying to get serious_ about leveraging DeepMind to create better products right now (and generate more revenue) instead of: "Look at this robot play soccer. Cool, huh?"
Why were people still using punchcards in the 80s?
"Corporations are a faceless entity with tremendous power, both to harm and to benefit."

So they should be held to an even higher standard.
I don't know if said bureaucracy is a blessing or a curse given Google's track record in product management. If pressed I would bet towards the curse option.
How VeraCrypt RAM Encryption Works
Pros: excellent material for a music video mocking the cops doing the search.
> OpenAI DO NOT WANT your private data in their training data

But they do want it. I can see many old chat logs.

Data is a liability. Does "clear conversations" in chat.openai.com actually remove them? Or jst mark them as "deleted", but they remain in a database. I just did a data export, then a clear conversation, then another data export. The second export was empty, which seems suspiciously fast to me
Successful Starship Launch Tempered by Failed Seperation
Thousands of log lines is actually pretty tiny though. I have some verbose logging in a testing lab and JUST network traffic from a few mobile devices can easily throw out several megs per hour in logs.
Yeah random acts of censorship for "good of the people", what can go bad /s

by all means put a content warning or maybe a suicide prevention hotline or other help but I'm tired of clowns trying to solve any problem with "bad content" with censorship. Like that didn't misfire enough times in history...
You'll be interested to read this: https://techcrunch.com/2023/03/13/wordpress-com-owner-automa...
A “prompt engineered” solution to process Markdown
> It’s totally cool to question motives

Oh yeah? OK, in that case: Yours are looking ever increasingly dubious.
Would-be burglar became trapped inside secure area of empty store
I wonder how this will impact Rapidus, the new Japanese foundry that is looking to manufacture 2 nm node technology by 2027.
Got let go a month ago. I had gotten to my frustration limit and wasn't managing it well. Basically have been focusing on mental health in the meantime while applying to some roles here and there. Very grateful for the support I have from my family and loved ones - I need it now.

Thinking about changing careers and becoming a psychotherapist myself.
I know, I'm glad Mullvad is offering this service and I think the benefits outweigh the worries some had

(of course, it all depends on the DNS provider you choose)
Why not both? You can use a splittkl like a md-770 or a Sinc, gets you a better posture while having virtually non-existent learning curve. Function keys and everything. The Sinc will get you qmk in case you want to use more esoteric features to reduce finger movement, but you don't have to.
It doesn't work for me in Brave on macOS. Holding the up arrow just flickers the thruster and the ship doesn't go anywhere. I had to switch to Safari to get it to work.
go deep enough down the rabbithole of a hobby/topic, and you find the passionate crazies
The old school news media outlets would plaster that story on front page, it's not something new to social media
No. I am not saying it’s the “industry” as much as the context of risk. That's why it doesn't matter if the analogy is Tesla or some other safety-critical manufacturer. To be clearer: how many F9 launches have carried humans?

Now go look at the history of Shuttle for the equivalent number of launches at that risk level. Would you claim they are equivalent in terms of human-rated safety?

If not, it’s only because you have the benefit of knowing the long-tail probabilities with the Shuttle.

>It's the same industry. Building the same type of product.

By extension of your logic, Starship should then already have the same launch reliability as F9. So either this is an example of a low-probability event, or your logic is flawed.