skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In my part time work as an artist this has been my experience as well: my best work always seems to happen after a “mistake”, then the pressure is off and I just start playing and experimenting. In the rare case where I execute a planned design with no mistakes, the outcome is generally stale and doesn’t live up to how I imagined it.
> being forced to shutdown under some kind of Swedish NSL

Given Mullvad I think they'd rather shut down.
I read it to be less against pharmaceutical treatments and more in support of preventative social measures.
Mullvad is not an operator, and you’re moving the goal posts.
If he was healthy don't worry, we would see his face on every billboard, newspaper, TV ad, and other formats advertising caffeine drinks, car brands, electronics, watches or whatnot. We'd all forcefully learn about his new lover, yacht, or car. But well things went south... "now I'm not a celebrity!".
i've noticed the opposite, usually performance is bottlenecked by specific and unpredictable hot spots
Is the Economist profitable?

That's one example that comes to mind of a potentially viable model - less clickbait, shorter news cycle, more depth, with a print option.

Online-only news has been a race to the bottom, I'd guess that profitability is more likely at the higher end.
You might be overestimating how many Americans think anything at all about Europe. I suspect that the US is a lot more prevalent in European news than Europe is in US news.
That's actually the hidden secret. Millions of people are using it to solve their problems quietly - something Google and other companies whose lunch they're eating should be worried about rather than being worried about grand ideas like "AI Safety". Pretty much all of my non-tech family is using it in ways that I never expected: making meal plans, writing school essays, making assignments for students, writing emails to CRA (Canadian Tax Agency), fixing broken english and translation, etc.
“Pay or Okay” – the beginning of the end?
It was sustainable until Google eviscerated them.
I'm with you on spaceflight but people definitely have built small cargo carrying UAVs to a lower standard than passenger aircraft. Such a thing is conceivable anyway.
Vivaldi Browser 6.0 Released
How a Tech Writer Tried to Build a Chatbot with OpenAI & Lived to Tell the Tale
The author is pointing out the "boy's club" nature of certain parts of the internet. Seems like valid criticism to me (I'm a white male). I don't mind being stereotyped occasionally for a good cause. I find the "Karen" stereotype more concerning considering it impacts such a small minority (people named Karen... the ones in my life don't fit the bill).
Fun fact: the earliest versions of the ASCII standard only had encodings for uppercase letters. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII#History)
UMG actions will likely result in exactly the opposite effect of their intention.

Everyone is tired of the gated walls of the music industry and this will only result in a rally behind AI even if AI itself becomes problematic in the end.

"Where is the value in AI creativity? Does it actually create anything? What can be said of artistic works in which the creation was essentially a series of playing at the lottery of the machine until something fantastic emerges? Spinning the wheel of chance and instead of red, black or some number, it is a series of lexical phrases with which we hope to catch the spinning ball on the Roulette and award us a work of art." - https://dakara.substack.com/p/ai-and-the-end-to-all-things
IMO we shouldn't have started wearing clothes to begin with, it was a bad call. If my ancestors could have just held off on that I'd have nice thick fur right now.
From what I understand, ADHD is typically thought to be the result of an inefficient (outside of an accepted typical range) reward/reinforcement system in the brain - whether due to not producing enough of the relevant neurotransmitters, or not being "sensitive" enough to them (yes, this is oversimplified).

How would MDMA (or any drug) alter this? Stimulants used to treat ADHD typically work by either getting you to produce more of those neurotransmitters or getting them to stick around for longer by inhibiting reuptake. I'm not sure of any drug or treatment that could permanently change these things in the brain.
Huawei's lead in 5G is well-documented, e.g. [1]. I left the 5G consultancy space in about 2021, but at the time Huawei was the only company that managed to put a CPU and a 5G modem on a single chip. As far as I am aware Qualcomm, Apple, Samsung and MediaTek can also do this in 2023, but came later. I'm already not sure if Intel can do this as of April 2023.

> Huawei is superior tech and yet they have horrible code

What's hilarious about this? Most large scale software has terrible parts. I worked a lot with Cisco gear after graduating from university. Our team found lots of security vulnerabilities. Still Cisco routers were very good, in comparison with what was on the market. Huawei's breakthrough was largely in signal processing.

> US did find backdoors.

The article states that those Huawei 'backdoors' are, from your article: "backdoors intended for law enforcement". Those are a legal requirement. You cannot get telecom equipment certified in the US and EU if they don't have those backdoors.

Your points (1, 2) have nothing to do with what I have written, why do you side-track the conversation?

[1] https://www.wired.com/story/huawei-5g-polar-codes-data-break...
I have done a bit of work with large arrays on the stack and in general this can be a problem area for Rust atm (or was a year ago when I looked into it). The reason is Rust uses a lot of move semantics, but under the covers I discovered many of these are not being optimized away and were actually mem copies. If you can keep your stack buffer in one spot and only pass refs to it I suspect you might be fine, but "moving" it is likely to incur a large performance penalty in some cases if not optimized away into a no-op.

UPDATE: I should probably add that just about everything that is a move could turn into a copy, and Rust uses the move paradigm so often that is is easy to not even see what might turn into a copy. For small vars, it is no big deal, but for huge stack arrays it could add up. For example, if you init your buffer in a block and then return it as a binding, it will often be copied which can be painful.

let my_buffer = {
let buffer: [u8; 1_000_000] = [0; 1_000_000];

// Do stuff to init buffer here

buffer // This might end up mem copying the buffer out of the block
};

UPDATE 2: I had a very atypical use case for doing this. In general, I would agree large buffers should be put on the heap, but for my use case it made sense. To this day, I use a "large" (128K) buffer on the stack in my crate for performance reasons. I solved the above issues by using macros. My benchmarks are now solidly faster than heap allocation without the moves.
Accidentally deleted a bit: Space elevators are inherently a means to reach orbit so they create …

PS: 911 didn’t happen because terrorists suddenly figured out how to build giant aircraft to douse buildings in tons of jet fuel they subverted an existing system that solved 99.9% of the technical problems. Thus by getting a few violent individuals on board with simple weapons simplified things to only needed to fly an aircraft that someone else built, got into the air, and filled with fuel.
So these disks had the exact same capacity? or could fit more data?
> it's entirely possible Mullvad is a honeypot operated by some foreign intelligence service.

“Entirely” possible? Sure, I guess it’s “entirely” possible that the NSA is actually controlled by a reptilian, illuminati cabal of extraterrestrials, while we’re just making stuff up without any factual basis whatsoever.
They're building Raptor engines at a pace of one per day though !
I'd guess the built up data structure data structure would be something like a dictionary that maps from the current state to a dictionary that maps from trigger conditions (or commands in the code above), to a struct that contains the new state, and optionally a transition action function pointer (or delegate, or whatever your language calls them).

That's about right yes. This particular thing was in C# in a fairly large desktop application, and the little extra memory needed for this or potential performance overhead of a dict wasn't a concern at all in the greater scheme of things.
RWD cars allow you develop a much higher degree of skill at driving because of the requirement to separately manage traction on the drive and steering axles.
Alternative take: SpaceX is so new they don't know what they don't know.

Take their example of a failed F9 strut, where the material supplied by a vendor didn't come close to meeting the necessary specs. A mature aersopace company would have processes in place to check the material for these specs before use. SpaceX has since levied these new process checks, but prior to that failure lots people may have pointed to them as being more efficient because of their 'streamlined' process.
And statistically many more people would have died without AP. But you're correct in that Tesla is using the same playbook on FSD as SpaceX, launch HW (and SW) early and iterate often, and I'd bet they'll save way more lives trying to get to autonomy like SpaceX rather than like NASA (the Waymo approach).
The US actually encouraged "IP theft" well into the 19th century and did not recognise foreign copyright.

On their side the UK not only banned export of certain technologies to the US but they also banned emigration of the people knowledgeable about them.
Daily Mail (UK) and NY Post (US) are quoting the cost of this launch as $3B
I disagree about a clinical setting, though I think I mostly agree overall.

Mainly I fear people will read this and mistake it for a defense of MDMA as a drug for going out with your mates. I think this can be helpful for some and very helpful for others but not as helpful as a clinical setting. Where a clinical setting is a therapists office and not a cold clinic room.

I do think people would do just as well or better with a couple good mates, a nice set and setting like you described, and some intentionality (vaguely even) about why they are going on the trip. The problem is many don’t have a couple good mates, or don’t know how to talk things through with themselves or otherwise, and would benefit from guidance. Better if people go into it with an agenda like a therapist would have.

Edit:
The reason this bothers me is because I’ve tried to think through what gave the few old hippies I’ve met burnout. And maybe they were just high but I fear it was psychedelics too often and for people on message boards to assume MDMA discussions are the same as psychedelic discussions when the dosing patterns I’ve heard discussed are very different.

This is I’m content with these synthetic drugs remaining prescription only. Having a system about it supports cultural expectations. The MAPS guys are really doing it right. The only problem is our system that doesn’t get approval for drugs out of patent. e.g. ketamine/s-ketamine
On HN, if Elon is associated with that company, it's a bad thing
And Falcon 9 is now the world's most launched system, with the record for the longest run without failures. So their approach seems to be working.
You joke but that's all also import rehearsal for all the teams responsible for each stage of the flight. The compleat plan, in full detail, with the "expectation" that it will happen is essential to learning.

If you don't start practicing these details until later in the development you have missed an opportunity to fine tune them and prepare for all eventualities.
surely not - they would have gathered information

there is something about this launcher and the launch that looks exeedingly wrong to me cf a saturn v (i realise spacex is trying to launch larger masses)
This does stand in contrast to other nations not having the problem to the degree that we do.

And... really, any other evidence. It is illegal for you to build and detonate a bomb in the city. Not shockingly, we have few incidents of this happening. Far fewer than random gun violence in places you are allowed to carry guns.

Heck, just set realistic goals here. We make it illegal to drive without a seatbelt, and have largely succeeded in getting folks to wear a belt while in a car. Something far far easier to just not do than the active "seek out an illegal gun" idea that you posit would continue to be a thing.

We control fireworks more readily than we do guns. Again, no surprise that we have far fewer counts of incidents with fireworks. And again, also no surprise it isn't zero.
> The state mucking around in private industry to achieve political and national security goals and wage information warefare is as American as hamburgers.

Ludicrous false equivalency.

The USA doesn’t have laws preventing its citizens from criticizing the government, nor are its corporations required by law to participate in policing speech.

This is the reason why criticism of China is so muted.
So there will be chinese hard drives soon on the market.
Some thoughts...

First, you need organizations interested in sustainable and not more and more shareholder returns. Sustainable is a different way to look at the financial planning.

Second, newspapers have long been funded by ads. But, the current structure of the ad business puts most of the profits in the pockets of the middlemen. Newspapers would need to re-evaluate ads and how to functionally be successful.

Third, you only need so many national or international level news organizations. Local news brings a of opportunity. Investment there may be worth while (I'd like to think so).

Basically, we need to change the way we think about it. Innovation.
Hah yes X-Copy, dreading a red? square on a bad copy, and wasnt there some kind of grinding noise trying to copy non spec disks?
Yes of course. It implies that the most impactful thing your presidential candidate can do is have a female gender.
I mean, that works and always worked, bootloader really have nothing to do with it (as commandline can be baked into kernel image even if bootloader wouldn't support setting it)
Height Copilot: AI Agent that helps your team build better products
Needing to make a big flame trench and deluge system might be the big takeaway from this flight. I'm not happy at the construction delays that'll entail but it that's what it takes for enough engines to get through liftoff it's what needs to be done.
Next: Emacs on bare metal.
I was actually in charge of a large open-source effort at Google (75 repositories, dozens of internal devs, hundreds of contributors) so I had a very unique position of being able to watch Googlers attempt to use Google engineering practices on GitHub.

For the most part they loved the open-source work (a lot more flexibility than internal systems) but they all complained about the code review! It just didn't give them the same rapid drive to consensus they got with Google's internal tools. And I think they were right.

So after I left Google I was very inspired to work on a better code review system for developers on GitHub. And that's how CodeApprove was born!
This is exactly what I wrote about in my second paragraph, isn't it? The intended meaning is not clear, because this definition again makes the set of naturals the same size as the set of squares.

> On the other hand, we can say that although {A,B,C} is not equal to any proper subset of {1,2,3,4}, it is in bijection with a proper subset, such as {1,2,3}. Although this is true, if we use this definition of "the same size as," we again get that the naturals are "the same size as" the set of all squares.
This isn't a production flight so why are you treating it at one? What if I told you that you can't compile your code until you deploy it for the first time and you don't get to change it much after that? I'll leave you to contemplate that thought experiment yourself.
Even a 100 man crew capsule?
> (1) to comply with specifications adopted by any industry group generally recognized as authoritative with respect to the Internet (e.g., RFCs),

This clause is probably the original motivation for this subsection (with 4, 5, and 6 being "obvious" corollaries of it): the .net TLD is the (de-facto?) place where Autonomous Systems expect to be able to register conventionally-named zones (format AS\d+\.NET), under which they then often register DNS names for things like backbone Internet switches.

Insofar as these ASes might be binding control-plane components to network middleboxes through these DNS names (unlikely, given the layer of the stack they operate on, but you never know), a takeover of their AS\d+\.NET domain-name would enable a wide-ranging attack on Internet infrastructure.

Additionally — though much less likely — you might be able to do some nefarious things just by squatting on an AS\d+\.NET domain name. If some engineer at the NOC is new there, and worked for other AS NOCs who did use AS\d+\.NET domain names to home equipment, but their new job doesn't, but they don't know that yet, they might misconfigure a system in a way that'd be innocuous if the domain was unregistered, but very bad if it was registered to an attacker.
My favorite Wikipedia note on this:

> The vocabulary used in "Uncleftish Beholding" does not completely derive from Anglo-Saxon. Around, from Old French reond (Modern French rond), completely displaced Old English ymbe (modern English umbe (now obsolete), cognate to German um and Latin ambi-) and left no "native" English word for this concept. The text also contains the French-derived words rest, ordinary and sort.
SpaceX's Starship Rocket Finally Flies–But Blows Up Minutes Later
Manager? A script and a chronjob should cover it.
Explosions are fun.

Once the stack was tumbling everyone in the SpaceX crowd knew the outcome (seeing as how they were standing behind Mission Control with better telemetry than is publicly transmitted they likely knew the rocket was going too slow or had too many engines out for an orbital speed test well before we did).

So yeah, cathartic big boom. Nobody got hurt, no customer cargo lost, company and their jobs aren’t at risk. Why not have some fun looking at the explosion then go back to work?
During COVID while I was WFH full time, I had a corporate IT-owned laptop whose primary purpose seemed to be to receive massive quantities of security updates and new security software installs, and reboot (it felt like!) every few hours, and run sluggishly when not obviously engaged in the above activities. After a day or two of this, I unplugged it and stored it in my closet for the remainder of my tenure with that employer (more than 1 year).

During the time that laptop lived powered off in my closet, I ran Citrix RDP (client on a personal desktop PC) to access a "engineering-owned" (vs corporate IT-owned) desktop PC located "at the office" on which I did 100% of my normal work.
To me it's an incredible achievement.

Raptor engine development started in 2012. Starship's development started around the same time. They now achieved max Q and got flight data all the way to booster separation. On real, flight ready hardware. By an all-American team started right here in California using private funding from an already profitable all-American privately developed launch platform (the Falcon 9).

This is in contrast to the SLS and it's predecessor the Constellation program (the SLS really being an evolution of the Ares I and V) that started in 2005 and, so far yielded a single successful test flight. Almost 30 billions sunk in "research and development" (for Shuttle derived hardware?). Excluding launch costs.

Or even really the crown jewel of the European Union, Ariane 6, a technological dead-end delayed once again and already 15 years behind the Falcon 9.
As long as money flows freely, the show must go on
BuzzFeed to shut down news division and lay off 15% staff
Oracle using AI to tell you if those lead times are hogwash
It's not even about the FAA requirements, it is just bare minimum engineering to ask where will this rocket go if it doesn't blow up mid-air?
>There will never be a "cheap" version of a commercial rocket with an accepted less-than-perfect failure rate. Spaceflight is an all-or-nothing game.

substitute rocket and spaceflight with airplane and flight and see how that sounds
I don't think this (comments by someone for commercial reasons not being indicated as such) is legal in the UK, I can't cite the legislation on it. Pretty sure it was in the raft of business requirements that the EU bundled, one of which was business being required to provide a trading address.

Perhaps part of the eCommerce directive?
Engaging with what, the several sources (not "someone's whole argument") I was encompassing in that "blah blah"? Have you engaged with sources related to this topic? If you're aware of some strong argument for natural rights that I've missed, please, point me in the right direction.

AFAIK they can stand up, kinda, if you have some foundational rules at the bottom that you're taking as divinely-revealed and unquestionable. Otherwise, not so much.

They're a good rhetorical tool and a nice shorthand for "thing we care about a lot", but I'm pretty sure it's a mistake to treat them as for-real real, to any greater degree than anything else we guard with laws and norms. Again, if you've got info that might change my mind, do share—it'd be really handy if they were real.
The problem is that the public and Congresspeople don't tend to see it that way. They aren't generally of the opinion that spending a couple billion to blow something up on the pad or shortly after launch is an acceptable resource expenditure (especially not at the Congressional level).

Rocket specialists know this is part for the course, but most of the public isn't rocket specialists.
What Makes People Act on Climate Change, According to Behavioral Science
Clearly you should have put $69 on it, what were you thinking?
So Pumping?
I've seen some really f**ed up text formatted files in the wild. In those cases I really see value in using something more "intelligent" (and declarative rather than imperative) rather than coding a non-trivial number of [python|bash] lines of code, especially when dealing with one-timers.
You don’t have a very rich imagination. It’s entirely possible this warrant was executed for no other reason than compliance, if requests come from foreign agencies for example obviously they have to be acted upon even if you are almost certain you will find nothing.
Show HN: Cloud Security Lounge – Datadog video series on cloud security
Datadog is launching the Cloud Security Lounge [0], a video series focused on cloud security products! My co-worker Izar Tarandach[1], and myself [2] will invite security professionals and discuss how they solve specific security problems, illustrated by hands-on demos and visuals.

The first episode, vulnerability management the SBOM Way, features Steve Springett [3], director of product security at ServiceNow and in the core working group of the CycloneDX SBOM format [4]. We discuss common use cases for SBOMs, vendor push back, how SBOM don’t solve anything just by themselves, and how SBOM formats and content will evolve security practices and capabilities in the near future.

2 years after the Sqreen (YC W18) acquisition by Datadog, our dream to democratize security and break silos between security and engineering teams is shaping up. Our vision now goes beyond application security, encompassing everything runtime related such as cloud infrastructures and workloads.
They were working with 1960s Soviet computing capabilities.

They were working with 1960s material science.

They were working with 1960s understanding of rocketry.

Korolev died.

We've come a long way in the last 50+ years, and sometimes you can use materials with substantially higher limits to paper over design risks.
Give ChatGPT long-term memory using the OP Stack
Unless I go to china, download the app on a chinese phone and use it, I cannot see for myself.