skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>docker swarm init

And just like that you have a cluster to run containers on. I really like the simplicity of Docker Swarm. I've been using it for at least five years and it's just worked.

During the COVID lockdown I got tired of having to open a UI (at the time I was using CapRover[0]) to edit any of the services I run so I decided to make my own PaaS with a nice CLI. Connecting to the docker socket is easy and the API is simple enough. It's been working no problem for the last two years.

The only complaint I have is that I can't see the user's IP for HTTP requests[1] but there is some hope in the form of Proxy Protocol[2]. I have no idea how complex the code for Docker Swarm ingress is, but I may spend a weekend in the near future scouting the code to get an idea. The current possible solution is to put a load balancer in front of the cluster that either sets the X-Forwarded-For header (or any of the equivalent ones) or speaks Proxy Protocol but I will avoid that solution for now.

I recommend Docker Swarm as a solution for anyone starting that doesn't want to spend hours and hours configuring a production environment. Even if it is just one node, you get services, replication, healthchecks, restart policies, secrets... And it all starts with that simple command, no further config needed.

[0]: https://caprover.com/
[1]: https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/25526
[2]: https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/39465
I think there are successful people in those fields who have honed a good intuition for psychology. That doesn’t mean the science behind it is good though.
> [AI is] the only practical way of getting to 1:1.

It is not the only way: getting other students to teach. Yes it has a bootstrapping problem of quality and requires QA on the delivery but it is still definitely doable at scale.
is this epic related?
"Video unavailable:
This video contains content from NBC Universal, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds"

Huh? How does NBC Universal have a copyright claim over PBS content? Do they have rights over PBS content outside of the US?
Hi! I was checking the channels, and I am not sure where to place this ask, so if I should put this somewhere else, I ask that mods please help me:

Hi there! My friend and I are interested in the 3D space but are big-time noobs. We would be incredibly grateful if we could chat with any experts in this community to understand real-life processes and workflows and possibly some challenges you've faced. Any insight would be invaluable to us! If you would be willing to chat with us for ~30 minutes, please sign up. We would genuinely appreciate it!
does sandboxing work for things so performance intensive as high end 3d games? (this obviously doesn't apply to low-fi games, including low-fi 3d ones)
What makes them "wonderful engineers"? The vast majority are very smart, and obviously can code 'leet code like no tomorrow, but that doesn't make them wonderful.

Remember when the person who created homebrew couldn't get a job at google. That person created software used by a lot of people. He saw something that "needed fixing" and he fixed it. He fixed it so well a bunch of other people started using his fix. That's a wonderful engineer. Created a project used (and loved?) by many people. That's the kind of person you want helping to create products at your company.

Google puts so much emphasis on (coding) skills that aren't needed for the majority of the work done, and doesn't emphasize selecting for the ability to create things that people want to use. I also find the coding skills selection kind of amusing since they had to create a simplified programming language (Go) because so many of their 'leet coding new graduates couldn't handle C++ correctly. Perhaps being able to 'leet code in your sleep doesn't really make you a "wonderful" engineer either.
The author here, thank you all for your interest in Wayback as a tool. It is a hobby project, and due to limited effort and time, we have focused on improving specific aspects of the tool and making it more user-friendly, but we have not invested in marketing.

The readme structure of the project is still in its original version and is relatively behind the development process. However, we have recently added a basic documentation at https://docs.wabarc.eu.org, which still needs improvement.

During the initial stages of the project, the idea was rather unstructured, and we did not have a well-planned approach. It offers similar functionality to other tools of its kind, one of its most notable features is its integration with instant messaging (IM) tools such as Discord [0], Telegram [1], and etc [2].

At this time, Wayback is still in an early stage of development, having recently implemented remote and local archiving of various resources, including HTML, PDF, HAR, WARC, Readability (Markdown and Txt), and media files such as images, videos, and audio. One of our next major goals is to improve the tool's indexing capabilities.

Overall, we hope that our work on Wayback will be useful to others, even in its current state of development. We appreciate any feedback or suggestions you may have for making it better.

[0] https://discord.com/api/oauth2/authorize?client_id=863324809...

[1] https://t.me/wabarc_bot

[2] https://docs.wabarc.eu.org/service/#service
Flamin' Hot Cheetos really are special, though. There's always been spicy chips and spicy this or that. These have a really nice acidic flavor, and just a lot of complexity I don't know how to describe. They're fantastic.
> Your claim was that if you argue against Mastodon, you're actually just a Musk lover, or if you argue for Mastodon, you just do it because you hate Musk.

No, my claim was specifically about "arguing Twitter vs. Mastodon".

> Those things are not related.

Exactly! That's my point. They are entirely separate issues that are too often conflated.

> But if I dislike both, I'm supposed to not "argue Twitter vs. Mastodon"? It doesn't make any sense.

If you dislike both, then it doesn't make any sense to argue Twitter vs. Mastodon. It's a false dichotomy.
People are different, I get it, but I don't want a search engine that tries to second guess me all the time. If I'm a programmer and I'm interested in the actual animal, I don't want to have to fight against the product. I'd much rather use my knowledge to craft my queries intelligently so that I get exactly what I want.

But then when it comes to technology, I'm a bit of a control freak.
What's better, armchair lawyers arguing for the common good or armchair lawyers arguing to leave all their rights to a megacorp to essentially not hurt the megacorp feelings?
To you and me, sure, there is value in a linux desktop.

To the average user, linux is not in any state to be a useable, daily driver desktop. Where it works, it is the exception, not the norm.

Taking linux and turning it into a business model can be done - see valve and the steam deck. Granted, that is gaming-only but it can be done. The #1 problem with the linux desktop is that there is no single linux desktop and things break far too often.
Kind of hard to say this, but unless some miraculous slowdown happens, it's coming for the entire human experience by the look of it. As Max Tegmark put it recently, we're basically Neanderthals building homo sapiens. I don't care what people think about Lex as an interviewer, it's worth a watch just to be more prepared for where things are likely headed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcVfceTsD0A
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1647950862885728256

> A pressurant valve appears to be frozen, so unless it starts operating soon, no launch today
Used that book for my son at around age 4. He never learned to love reading, but he’s a good reader.

One thing that always perplexed me is his spelling/writing. He does very little reading on his own. But he spells and writes incredibly well. He can spell words he has never seen before - I think he can apply implicit rules after seeing relatively few examples.
This can't be the reasoning because the policy is to select /for/ under-30s, not over-30s.
Really?! You mean that my offering additional information and context didn't magically alter the very nature of time itself, thus causing the characters that they typed to change representation in Hacker News' database? You don't say! (do I need a /s indicator?)

And what value, exactly, does your comment add to the conversation?
It's called a teacher you find them in schools. If you pay them properly and give them adequate resources they can achieve these goals. You also add in libraries and other places where kids can learn independently.
It seems like it does.

> paying Samsung for staying on Android with Google Search

> google still owns android

> Personally I use GrapheneOS in order to "de-Google"

It doesn't matter that Google owns Android if Samsung can make their own fork of Android that doesn't use Google stuff by default. Is there something that would prevent Samsung from creating their own app store?
Continuing with the oil analogy, I wonder if they'd have done better if they did something similar to what Norway did with their oil wealth (i.e. only spend a small percentage on the interest earned from oil). Perhaps they could've spent less on all of their moonshots and focussed solely on AI. Hindsight is 20/20 I guess.
- German company Aleph Alpha creates LLMs for commercial usage
- LAION (German organisation) published open assistant

- Stable Diffusion was developed in Germany.
I want someone to do a whole Tupac album of AI generated songs, call it “Tupac is AlIve”. Tupac is an artist who has managed to come back from the dead several times, even as a Hologram. I think he’d be fine with it.
It’s really not that hard to find data on GSuite vs Office market share that isn’t anecdotal

https://www.saasgenius.com/blog/why-office-365-is-overtaking...
I understand that laws are weird and that you'd want to err on the side of caution. I don't understand that it's so easy to get someone's content taken down to the extent that (for example) a DMCA takedown request is a common retaliatory tactic between YouTubers when they're beefing, and that there's little recourse other than getting enough people Tweeting about it that a YouTube exec stumbles upon the issue during their morning coffee. I also don't understand why there's seemingly no process to revisit such strikes, or get a human involved in the process.

I guess there's some section of their TOS stating "we might just nuke your account because we feel like it" so they're legally in the right to do whatever they feel like. Just feels like such a weird way to operate such a business - to just go completely hands-off and let all participants tear each other apart via content reporting or takedown requests.
Maybe an unpopular opinion but it feels like Google is near useless anymore. Between results containing outdated or broken links to empty discussions, and ads being their main priority as well as "fuzzy search results" where you can search for one thing and get something completely unrelated because Google decided you also meant to search for something else that is possibly contextually adjacent, I can't really get good results from it anymore.

I mean, I can still get answers for simple questions but when it comes to anything unique or complex I usually just get frustrated and go to duckduckgo or something else. ChatGPT now adays mostly.

Sure ChatGPT can hallucinate but Google's results rely on some random person somewhere to have properly answered something. The reality of that is so many of the "answers" I find are discussions on forums between a bunch of random people who have no real credentials or factual answers but instead just opinions based on something else they read on Google. People google something, read the google blurb about it at the top of the results, then go answer other people's questions.

I honestly think Google is losing favor at this point. I've even been considering moving away from Android because the OS just feels like the Walmart iOS now adays. It features the same problems but in a way that nothing is polished versus iOS.

Google needs to stop just following everyone else. Everything now adays feels like the ol Google+ move. "Ah, successful product someone else made, let's remake it and name it google something!"
Good point. Didn't think of that. It's a plausible explanation here, because the dimensionality of the spaces is so different, 5120 vs 768. Not surprisingly, the trained weight matrix has rank 768: it's using every feature in the lower-dimensional space.

Still, it's kind of shocking that it works so well!

I'd be curious to see if the learned weight matrix ends up being full-rank (or close to full-rank) if both spaces have the same dimensionality.
I picked the top spenders of NATO.

Who in NATO has given more than US, UK and Canada?

Show your sources
Drake is a child actor from a well off family. There's nothing authentic about him or any other top pop artist from autotune to ghostwriters. Their stories are of music label hit factories.
I think some things should have a higher standard than others. For example, medicine vs. video games. So not willing to apply the same standard to everything.
> Overcharging a lead acid battery can also lead to the generation of hydrogen sulfide, which can cause harm to workers if exposed.

The concern is also the toxicity of H2S. Most SLA chargers are poorly designed and will overcharge any battery that isn't in mint condition.
> On the other hand, if solo inventors do not know how to monetize their invention, they should give/sell it to someone who will know, not to milk the idea it for decades.

That's partly what patents are for. So a small inventor can sell a technology without getting reverse-engineered in the sales process. If they do get reverse-engineered, then there is a whole new set of patent customers who will buy the patents in order to sue over them.
Boeing, the modern car industry, Macbooks, Pratt and Whitney, Cummins, Caterpillar, the Norfolk Ship Yards,, the modern cardboard/"fiber" packaging industry, our incredibly green Forestry industry, the growing modular housing industry.

Apple Google Amazon Rocketdyne Tesla HP Cisco Systems
> "Yes, like the natural persons involved, because that's the default state of private companies structured correctly."

Arguably it shouldn't be the default state, or even possible.
I think what will likely happen is the live music will become more valuable as it is the unique experience that people will search for.
Yep, much worse than some free stock images
That's kind of how I think about bootcamps pumping out web devs. They're like trade schools, teaching you just enough fundamentals to know how to use existing tools.
I don't think it's surprising for that to happen on the transition to a smaller workforce.

Rather than that, I am frankly amazed that the site largely works after firing 80% of its workforce. It's staggering.
Do you mean that if I had invented a "machine for airborne transportation", such as, say, a hot-air balloon, I could collect royalties on jet airplanes?
I was not considered a "late" reader at all for the early 80s though, at least where I was -- they just didn't try to teach preschoolers to read then and there like they do now. I think what they do now is a mistake... but that could be my own anecdotal prejudices.
> There's very little value in the Linux desktop and I don't see that changing anytime soon

Only because no-one has disrupted the market. Typical case of “Who would pay for a Mantis open-source bugtracker”, then Jira appear and companies purchase it.

What you mean is, who would pay for Ubuntu. But I’d pay for an open-source macOS, with online backups, video editing and SSO for my IT fleet, anything that doesn’t look like Ubuntu.
Honestly weeks feel more relevant than months for day-to-day life. Source: my four-year-old understands weeks (because she can see the difference between weekdays when she has school and weekends when she does not) but not months.
No, it says its policies affect sex trafficking. The recent move towards verifying consent has arguably helped combat sex trafficking for pornography. Their verification rules are the standard which sex traffickers must now try to work around.

Saying that it has a position of responsibility against trafficking is not saying it's equal to trafficking.
I would disagree on both assertions.
Great book about the rise of the Berlin techno scene called Der Klang Der Familie. In my read of that, the techno of Berlin and Detroit arose organically, simultaneously, and they sort of found each other serendipitously, and were connected through clubs like Tresor and labels like Interfisch. The world wasn't as connected in the late 80's early 90's as it is today, and particularly for the sorts of people that were squatting in abandoned structures in East Berlin.
I don't know how it's possible to read Musk's twitter feed and conclude that Twitter is balanced now. The CEO exclusively interacts with and caters to right-wing accounts.
you would struggle to find _anybody_ who listens to house music beyond top 40 radio hits...

This isn't an trade rag, it's the New Yorker & The New Yorker has a broad reader base. I don't think it's a stretch to say most readers aren't listening to house music beyond top 40 radio hits.
>They are entirely separate issues that are too often conflated.

You're the one that is conflating them.

>If you dislike both, then it doesn't make any sense to argue Twitter vs. Mastodon. It's a false dichotomy.

How?
I remember there being a distinct lack of "closing the loop" on concepts in university math.

Day 1 of the class: The derivative calculates the slope of a function

Day 2: The integral calculates the area under the curve of the function

Days 3-89: Rote exercises deriving and integrating increasingly obscure functions

Day 90: Final Exam

Spending a few days at the end re-exploring the "big picture day-1" to tie together all of the various strands of knowledge you accumulate over the semester would have made all of it so much more effective.
The Permian basin uses technology that is almost all made in America and is now the largest oil producer on Earth. The industrial base in TX is absolutely incredible and rarely discussed.

Likely a big reason SpaceX moved there.
For what it’s worth, that doesn’t sound typical to me. I’d say pre-school, it’s it’s done at all, is done at the age of 4 - maybe 3 if you’re doing it super early. I’ve never heard of “K4” and “K5,” and most kids start kindergarten at age 5 and only do one year of it.

Where do you live?
> A pressurant valve appears to be frozen, so unless it starts operating soon, no launch today

I believe that's a somewhat common cause for their aborted\failed missions, even going back to early days. How come it's still not getting caught during prelaunch testing?
Educational researcher here. There's no such thing as a "science of reading." It's part of the highly politicized "reading wars" (see also the "math wars" which has been going on for decades). It's no coincidence that Republicans are pushing phonics as the end all be all solution to teaching reading, and you can cherry pick educational research studies that support or disconfirm various teaching strategies. Phonics has its place, contexts where it is appropriate and beneficial, but it is not the sole strategy that works or should be used in every context.

A recent meta-analysis https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338494581_Meta-Anal... and the What Works Clearinghouse have summaries of the evidence for different strategies for improving early reading skills: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguide/14
Direct Instruction (also championed by one political side) is not an effective strategy: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/EvidenceSnapshot/139

Here's just one post with a little more info on the political context: https://radicalscholarship.com/2023/01/14/does-the-science-o...

A bigger scandal is how states like Florida game the system to make their reading score rankings look higher: https://www.tampabay.com/opinion/2023/01/05/floridas-educati...

The good news is there are a lot of strategies that help with reading in various contexts. There's even research on how reading to dogs (or even robots) helps students with reading :)
Microsoft's effort to corner the developer productivity software market has surprised me with how successful it's been. Github has solid vscode integration, WSL works well enough, copilot is seeing use. They've really solidified themselves as the enterprise productivity software company for all stacks other than creative which adobe still dominates. Wonder if they plan to expand there next?
Please look up what "interceded" means.

Even if v9 isn't an IEEE standard, you can still pay Sparc Intn'l for a license. Try going to intel with a request to make x86 chips.
I wonder if it's more the fear of needing a desktop app one day again that you haven't started in years than the actual need for desktop apps.
There are plenty of good RSS services now. In fact I’d argue there is more choice and higher quality now than when Reader was around. I use Newsblur as my aggregator and either net news wire on my Mac and Unread on my iPhone and ipad. I’m glad Google got out of the RSS business.
This is the only part they aren't on caliber in most cases. I rarely hear Slides or Docs isn't as good as PowerPoint or Word (even though, at least on paper, Word and Powerpoint have more features).

It seems that the sticky moat is Excel (and to a lesser extent but gaining somewhat rapidly, the Teams integration into 365. Google has blown it on being the enterprise chat solution).

Seems Google could chase this to close this, but Microsoft Excel is just absolutely sticky
Because an upscale art gallery also sells -at least tacitly- resell value. While listening to music, at least when alone, only requires an appreciation for the music itself.
BFR is more capable than Falcon, it's only natural to invest in projects with better prospects.
Not OP, but I'd start with a one-click way to "install" the PWA apps using an API, e.g. with a banner (like on Android) instead of an item in the share menu.
>They should have tried to make a better desktop OS (just buy Canonical or something)

Ah yes, Canonical, land of people attempting to fork the Linux ecosystem and getting shot down by everyone and doubling down.

Would be a perfect fit for Google.
This wasn't written by clamchowder and is this author's first submission.

Hopefully there's room for them to grow.
I think, at this point, the burden of proof has shifted for skeptics to prove why AI won't be able to produce a certain kind of art.

Still, I think music will be the most resistant to these kinds of trends. Anyone who is familiar with classical music or jazz can tell you that even when the same piece is performed by two very talented musicians, there's often an ineffable and unquantifiable "it" factor that separates the merely incredibly talented from the truly great. Sometimes this is incredibly subtle, or isn't immediately apparent to those who aren't familiar with a genre, but especially because music directly involves the human voice and the movements of the human body, I find this je ne sais quoi much more readily apparent in music than any other artistic medium.

Does that mean AI won't be able to capture it? No, definitely not. But I do think as the marginal cost of producing derivative pop music goes to zero, people will gravitate towards more "organic" forms of expression that are more difficult to emulate through brute force. For example, there's a lot of bad noise music and bad free jazz out there. Most of it probably. I'm sure AI can already produce convincing bad noise music. But since that's already the case, the bar is much higher for AI to produce something that's actually good.
I have a tiny measure of power over Apple. I can decide not to buy their products or their stock.

But I have zero power over the EU. And yet they're legislating what my iPhone is going to work like. Talk about unaccountable.

The free market did not deliver competing app stores because that is not a problem for the majority of users and is in fact a huge boon for most.