skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I do (and I guess I'm not alone...) -- have IPv6 exposed machines over a HE.net tunnel. Some of the things are ONLY accessible over IPv6 (because nobody needs them over IPv4, so that's enough).
I didn't even know they were still doing DVDs.
Guess a lack of marketing didn't help.
Not sure why you're ignoring the various official and unofficial accounts which use Twitter to distribute information during natural disasters which has saved lives, in a way that RSS can't replicate.
Don't take advantage of someone's passion project to self-promote/advertise your product.
The bar is higher now which is what has really changed. Your thing has to work on every network, through multiple levels of NAT, without copy-pasting ip addresses or updating system files, often across multiple platforms.

WebRTC is the focus because it won by a huge margin, other p2p protocols are a footnote. Everything uses WebRTC whether it actually has a web client or not.
Great, but I would have to run this in >my< private cloud. no way any business is going to upload its docs into a third-party cloud, no matter what the small print says.
The issue with humans is that when everyone has the responsibility, no one has the responsibility. The moment those kids are 'raised by a village' or however many participants of the family, it automatically becomes a lot harder unless, somehow, the tribe is much more cohesive and can reinforce effectively the same rules consistently.

<< "traditional" gender roles do not alleviate this.

I would personally argue that the "traditional roles" seem to help the offspring on several levels, but I didn't see many studies ( as opposed to non-traditional that is ) to that effect.
It's very likely designed for that use case so not very relevant.

Most PC are delivered with Windows, and even though Linux works on them, it's unlikely the PC were designed with suspend stability as criteria.
Seems promising, thank you.
> I comment on the decisions of the company management/ownership, not on the investment criteria of users of the stock market.

The purpose of my questioning is to shine light on the fact that these two things are related, which answers your original question of

> Why this need to always make more and more money?

I am sure Yubico’s owners and employees also want to maximize their compensation, but the fact that there are many investors in the public market pretty much only looking at ROI is what enables the business model of milking users.
Reminds me of an artwork that compiled shots of clocks and watches from movies into a 24 hour cycle. The journalist reporting on it was so entranced they kept visiting at different times of day/night
I've no idea if it is, but there's a big difference between a bounded amount of money and a potentially infinite amount of money earned. If he has a startup that goes somewhere, or he wins the lottery, potentially he can be out from under this in one situation, or not in the other
Great! Looks like you could load all of that into a SQLite DB.
Corporate Venture Capital Can Drive Startup Growth
What happen is that dads realize that it's easier to write , maintain, and monetize multi-client software that runs primarily on the dev's computer and pushes some of the UI to the client, than multi-client software that runs primarily in the client computers.
Yup - really a nifty way to handle exposing services.

I use MetalLB locally, and it does exactly this for its layer-2 mode: https://metallb.universe.tf/concepts/layer2/

Makes for a great little load-balancer setup on bare metal k8s. I have to lose a LOT of machines all at once for anything to go down and stay down, and my router configs use a known ipv4 address for everything, without having to care at all about which machine is actually handling it.
I came on the comment page just to write the same.
MariaDB cuts jobs, repeats 'going concern' warning to stock market
Yes, quite possibly overgeneralization there. Thinking on it....
Losing my Twitter client was what got me off the platform for good, and by the end I welcomed it.

It's the same for Reddit. Of course it's not enjoyable anymore. It's just hard to pretend it isn't there and make a clean break.

But paying for a third party client is a non starter, as is using the official site or app. At this point if they want to drive me away I won't fight it.
This is a very clickbaity title. Over 6 years ago I worked as a student on reconstruction of 50 micron human brain (part, occipital lobe) MRI images, also captured in 9.4T.
Obviously a 10x higher resolution is still impressive, but it’s a mouse brain, and it’s certainly nowhere close to 64M times the resolution of comparable prior work…
> Why do so many of us, including the biggest influencers in the world, spend so much money only to post all of our content on the Big Tech’s sites and infrastructure? You give all your social capital to them too, and they turn around and sell it back to you (access to your own followers) and can deplatform you. They encourage you to pay them to attract eyeballs away from other videos, and vice versa, in a zero-sum game on their own platform.

Because we're lazy and Big Tech solves the immediate, short term problem.
And don’t step on them while barefoot.
I like the, move location to adjust volume :D
Android GMaps has done this for years already.
The Winner’s Edge
It's clear that ChatGPT is used as the foundation model and that Chat PDF did some prompt engineering to make it focus on the contents of the PDF primarily. I uploaded a government form for family expense reimbursement, and then asked Chat PDF what the capital of France was. Its answer: "I'm sorry, but the answer to your question is not relevant to the content of this PDF file. However, the capital of France is Paris."
Gmail has had this issue for years, if you type in the search bar a bit fast or the system is a bit busy, some of your key presses will trigger keyboard shortcuts and randomly select/archive/mark as read/open emails in the current view. This is maddening because you can end up missing emails completely as there is only a single level of undo.
Technically correct, but you're missing the point.

Eventually you do need to be able to commit some sort of transaction and get confirmation from the counterparty.
I see your point about mathematics, but even if most of mathematics were done by formally proving theorems, I would argue that it is still a small (though highly significant) part of the whole of human knowledge, when we take into account everything else studied in academe beyond mathematics and logic, together with the knowledge that each person uses in their everyday lives. I am not a mathematician and I struggle with it, but I have read that most mathematics is not conducted formally, but with informal reasoning which mathematicians reasonably expect could be formalized, if it came to that - a view that seems closely aligned with what you have written here (I'm not sure where I read this; possibly a Quanta article by someone such as Terence Tao.) If my history is correct, a lot of the mathematics that we use outside of mathematics itself was developed before it was formalized.

Don't put too much trust in what I wrote about how Penrose deals with the consistency issue; it's been a long time since I read his first book, I never did read the second (his response to criticism of the first), and I put that paragraph together from a couple of hours 'refresher' on the internet. I am reasonably sure, however, in my recollection that Penrose, following Lucas, constructed his argument from the formality of Turing machines and the Turing-equivalence of programming languages. Theorem provers demonstrate that it is possible for computers to produce formal arguments, but that is not sufficient for his purpose, which is to show that computers cannot do something that human minds can do.

On the other hand, I am guessing that it would be relatively straightforward to take a theorem-prover and modify it so that its logic is inconsistent? If I am not mistaken, this is a question you are well-positioned to answer, so your comments would be appreciated. If inconsistent theorem "provers" are possible, this would seem to defeat Penrose's argument, unless one adds the premise that humans are consistent reasoners, which seems to me to be obviously false.

Personally, I believe that human minds have evolved via natural selection from precursors that are, broadly speaking, understandable, and have probably done so without the intercession of currently-unknown fundamental physics or extra-physical causes, so I take an interest in arguments claiming that this cannot possibly be so, or that they could not possibly be simulated by a digital computer. Nevertheless, I agree entirely with your last paragraph.
Aha ’s bootstrapped journey to $100M+ in ARR
I use a custom firmware with Termux. It's enough for me.

https://medium.com/junior-dev/how-to-re-purpose-your-old-and...
For context, the performers Nicole & Hugo are from the Flemish (Dutch speaking) part of Belgium, not the Netherlands. Nicole recently passed away.
This article gets a bit closer to the core of the matter: https://directdutch.com/2013/05/word-of-the-day-gezellig/

As a Dutch person, worth pointing out that we Dutch people like using words in an ironic sense. So using the word gezellig in situations are anything but gezellig is ironic and therefore something people might do. But it adds to the confusion.

But basically it usually refers to situations, locations, or meetings of people being either gezellig (enjoyable, agreeable, etc.) or the opposite, ongezellig.
It also gaslights people into believing their negative emotions are their own fault, if everyone else pretends to be positive.
I didn't use DBEaver, but written some Java and using Eclipse for 20 years.

Java's UI libraries are extremely prone to wrong initialization. If you skew from the reference guide's implementation, Java's libraries try to mend the problems themselves, but this adds observable latency to the UI.

Of course, Java is never as fast as natively compiled language, but asymptotically approach to that speed and come pretty close. The funny thing is, some of the today's native applications are both heavier and less responsive w.r.t. their Java counterparts. This is because we tend to add loads of dependencies which aims to simplify development in said language, but that price is always paid at the end. Either once by the developer, or repeatedly by the user.
Based on your comment about composability, I'm assuming that's what you actually meant by "functional"? Perhaps you want maps & folds over queries?
> Even the most environmentally aware people around me pretty much just eat less meat, but they haven't actually changed their ways. So I don't expect the average F150 driving steak eater to suddenly start changing their ways.

What do you expect people in general to do? Granted, driving an F150 is not an environmentally friendly activity, but suppose they all cut their "carbon footprint" [0] by 50%. How much would that help?

The answer is actually "not much." It turns out that 70% of greenhouse emissions have come from ~100 corporations. [1] Until we, collectively, do something about their practices, there's precious little that individuals can do to get us to net zero.

Individuals have no power to influence corporations in this way, either. It needs to come from things like carbon taxes -- and not just from one country, but worldwide.

There's far more that can be said here, but I think I've successfully conveyed the point: feeling hopeless in the face of all this is actually pretty logical. At this point, we really are basically doomed to suffer the effects of 1.5 degrees of warming, and possibly much more, no matter what we do right now.

I don't want to oversell this to the point of saying we should all just roll over and die; by all means, we should all work on reducing our consumption, because at this point, the choices that are going to provide us a better future in the next couple of decades are essentially those that reduce consumption. The other alternatives are reducing the number of people on Earth, or drastically increasing energy efficiency across the board. A couple decades' worth of energy efficiency increases isn't going to do it, and if we choose not to reduce consumption, the effects of climate change will ensure that the number of people on Earth decreases, whether we like it or not.

So, we're essentially left at reducing consumption. But, as you've mentioned, people don't seem to want to do that. I don't know how to deal with that at a personal level, myself. Do you? Is it any wonder teenagers don't?

---

[0]: Make no mistake, this is just a propaganda term intended to blame you and not the actual (mostly corporate) actors responsible for making most of the emissions.

[1]: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220504-why-the-wrong-pe...
Taube Archive of the International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg, 1945‑46
Many people got that hygge book, but it's funny when you actually go to Denmark and find out most of it is actually made up. Hygge is real, but it's being pushed way more now that it's become a global word.
I think it’s more than forgetting. I didn’t forget for sure. But what is easily forgotten is why we moved from local p2p to internet brokered services. It’s mostly simplicity. By hosting all the state and discovery, match making, etc, in a remote service outside the local network and RF environment, you dramatically simplify everything to “configure the local tcp stack.” The 50’s-2010 world wasn’t awesome and things were super fragile, tedious, poor compatibility, etc etc. The move to service based approach meant protocols were homogenous and compatible, implementations were simple, state management easy, reliability near perfect, etc. You even get to ensure everyone has basically the same software since all the real software is in the service and there’s exactly one version on earth. In the bad old days you referred to, every device around you had some ragged edge version dependency graph of everything from the device to its network card through to the end user experience. It was a miracle anyone ever played Red Alert on the LAN.

People always talk about “how expensive” it is to send packets to Oregon to turn on your lightbulb in seattle. But the cost is already fully loaded and paid for. If you didn’t notice it, maybe that’s because it’s actually not more expensive? Yes latencies are higher, and that’s literally the only downside I can imagine. But it is a lot more reliable, flexible, simpler to deploy in any environment, robust.
If the person saying that had been previously famous for calling for the legalisation of cannabis, and wrote a whole book about how the war on drugs was misguided and led to terrible outcomes and then never addressed the obvious overlap between the two stances, that would also be strange.
That's just good marketing, isn't it? "Our product is amazing! In fact it's too good, no you can't have it. Unless just maybe, we might let you buy access to it." Oh wow if it's so good that they won't let me have it then I definitely want it!
All new ancient sources are "interesting" in some way or other, given the paucity of texts that have survived to the present day. A newly deciphered text about an astronomical instrument will probably result in new information about Graeco-Roman scientific instruments more generally.
Rejoice!

I went with a paper[^1] from the other camp, and although it did a good job of summarizing it, it was not good at answering specific questions, e.g. the type of proteins that were common in Asgard archea and eukariotes.

But to me, a tool like this has to be one of the coolest applications of ChatGPT.

[^1]: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.04.429862v1....
So what happens to the data from the PDF and the uploaded once I have stopped chatting with it ? A hard pass if you cant ensure the privacy of my data.
> 6 months is hyperbole.

No it's not. I tweaked my knee pretty badly to the point where i would wake up at night from deep sleep due to pain (and I generally have a higher pain tolerance) and the best the doctor could do was prescribe ultra sound cause getting an MRI scan would take 6-7 months.

Even then the earliest appointment I could get for a knee specialist to look at my knee is 6 months.

It really depends on where you're. If you're in the city of Toronto, good luck getting an MRI appointment.

> those that can wait 6 months are asked to wait 6 months

You do know that you're body doesn't decide to wait 6 months for an MRI and stop developing scar tissue right?
You mean convivial (the same word in French, slightly different meaning)
The Internet, through social media and clickbait news, encourages people to get ever-angrier and ever-more-radical until they attempt to 'change things' by smashing and burning, or justifying violence against political 'enemies'.

I don't know what the answers to the world's big problems are, but I'm pretty sure that smashing, burning, and pushing for violent revolution, insurrection, or civil war is not the answer.
Evaluating, understanding and identifying argumentative essays written by GPT
It would also be much more bloated (and not feel native) on Windows. Qt is what now? 30 or 50 MB? GTK probably much better these days. For that size you can almost go to Electron and get better look and feel (at the cost of RAM) ;-)
> As to why, A) given Apple's lawyers, I'm sure they can structure the deal so as to minimize exposure to regulations for the rest of the empire, and B) they like money. Judging from how much of it they have, they really like money.

Everyone really likes money. If Apple wanted to, they could just buy Goldman Sachs in cash, it is worth a small fraction of Apple. Or any number of small banks, but there is huge regulatory risk involved, and it is not necessarily true that all opportunities for profit are worth the risks and costs.

As far as I understand, the regulatory hurdles for starting and operating a bank are so big and the ROI so low that pretty much no new bank gets started these days, and only old ones get bought for those who want to get into the banking business.

https://money.cnn.com/2015/07/29/investing/dodd-frank-new-ba...

> it means they're now running savings accounts for consumers,

Are they? Or is it better described as they have integrated their software with that of a bank’s database?
Non-paywall link:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/18/opinion/heart-transplant-...
If anyone has ever heard, "I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this any more!", this is the movie that originated from.
Secret Repository (Contributor: IBM-Ers)
I found this repository lately, it's a useful resource for those who wants to see how python is integrated with cyber-security, Machine Learning, ChatGPT etc.
<< Effectively, be passive. Do not try to improve things.

This is a very uncharitable interpretation. If anything, parent is saying that staying engaged and not giving up just because an issue came up, is a positive, valuable and, most importantly, not passive at all. In other words, if you can't even deal with the problem you received, how are you even begin to 'improve things' overall? You can't even handle your own circumstance to a reasonable degree.

It is easy to generalize ( see? ) and be cynical.

<< And we are back to gender essentialism, where moms are not empowered to provide structure making them dependent on father in work for it. And dad has a role of threat that comes home after being absent whole day just to punish you for mistakes during the day.

Is it maybe because it seems to have better outcomes?

Is having a dad and a mom so bad that you cannot accept those positive outcomes ( and I can easily grant there are bad ones as well )?
I also will not upload a proprietary document to this service. But mine and many other organizations do upload proprietary documents into third-party clouds (e.g., Azure, Google).
Yes, chemical storage is likely the only reasonable way (outside nuclear). Although i would bet more on methane/co2 closed cycle, or ammonia, than on hydrogen. But these are not proven technologies at the grid scale.
People always say correlation does not equal causation but they never mention how does one determine causation definitively?

Unlike typical observational science, causation must be established by having the experimenter intervene with the experiment himself. The experimenter must introduce or remove smart phones to the population being experimented on and record any changes to the data.

So it's actually very possible for the author to prove his own theory beyond reasonable doubt.

These are the 2 options I can think of that can be done individually or together:

1. Remove smart phones away from people who are depressed. Measure depression levels over time.

2. Pick a set of humans that don't use smart phones and choose who will have access to smart phones and who never will over a period of 5 or 10 years. Measure depression levels over time.

We have procedures in place to prove things like this with medicine. I think it's very possible to conduct experiments like this with the rigor of clinical trials given that you can literally remove or introduce the predicted causative agent from any human: smart phones.

It's worth it to mention here that not all things are amenable to causative experiments. I believe in climate change but it is not possible to run a causative experiment where you remove or introduce the causative agent: greenhouse gases. It is unfortunate that climate change cannot be established as true beyond reasonable doubt simply because all current evidence is correlative.

But for smart phones it is very very possible for the author to go far beyond a retort and actually prove his claims correct.
This is the inevitable conclusions of stranger danger and car-based suburbanization.

When people only access the world via car and avoid walking around, they never build familiarity with their own neighborhood. All locations worth stepping out of the car for, are miles away and behind security gates. Low density also means that 1 stranger can actually do damage, unlike dense areas where there are at least a few strangers within earshot.

Suburbanization inevitably caused stranger danger. Once public trust was eroded, only known parents could be trusted to supervise children. The coldness towards strangers goes both ways. 'Strange children' near you were seen as something between an annoyance and a liability. With multi-income households, the only location where children were safe and tolerated, was friends houses or ones with paid strict supervision. So, the kids retreated into indoor activities or found themselves at mandatory hobbies, a term that sounds dystopian even as I type it out.

Social media has virally encroached into every aspect of these children's lives. But, lets not pretend that North American society didn't lay down ground work, fertilizer and all, for this travesty to take place.

People are the river and built infrastructure is the path of least resistance. Once built, the river will meander down that path, irrespective of human effort to affect outcomes counter to the built infrastructure.

___

I grew up in a dense Asian city famous for a culture of 'leaving you alone = independence' (in comparison to the rest of the nation). Even then, I knew the faces of every small store owner within 5 minutes of my house and vice-verse, and that's because I walked by them everyday. When everyone leaves home from the same door (the building exit) and walks back in through the same door, you inevitably have small talk and get to know your neighbors.

The public ground was nearby, so all parents would swing by to check-in on kids as they passed by during the day. This meant that the older kids were familiar and parents felt confident in leaving their younger children under their supervision, in return for complete freedom in terms of how the kids spent their time.

North America has no thirds spaces, thinning mom-n-pops stores and a lack of public shared spaces. North America seems to have completely forgotten that it takes a village to raise a child.