skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Does this allow commit/rollback on a graph DB?
I moved my belongings in a kei trucks to my new place and I just bought a new kei car. I love them, easier to drive than big cars as well. Fun fact, they are more expensive used in Japan than regular cars since they are more desirable for tax reasons and cheaper on the highway.
If emissions were the concern they’d just require the cars to pass emissions.

Although I strongly favor allowing import of recent foreign cars, safety features are a much better practical objection for folks who love objecting to good things. Non-US cars would lack many many mandated features and there’s no workaround
We're starting with Spanish, but will quickly be rolling out more (and more complete) courses in the following order:

- English
- French
- Japanese
- Mandarin
- ...many others

If you're interested in staying up-to-date, feel free to join our discord for daily frequency, or our mailing list for less frequent, big updates.

Join this Discord Server
https://discord.gg/Ra29KXCp

Mailing list
https://us11.list-manage.com/contact-form?u=7112a7b710649647...
Follow us on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0GNgANfDjnCblcGidS7LPP
Bulk TCR sequencing cost around $500 to $1000 and captures under a million T cells. scRNA Seq costs around $10,000 and captures under ten thousand T cells. The price of sequencing is falling exponentially so my numbers can be out of date
> Is that a virtue? it makes steering tougher.

Not in my experience it doesn't. In icy or otherwise low-friction conditions, the steerable wheels being powered makes correcting for understeer and oversteer much easier than if they're unpowered - specifically because, per above, you can readily accelerate in directions other than forward/reverse, allowing you to orient the car even when sliding out. You can't rely on the tires' lateral friction to help you steer; a tire at an angle on ice will just slide with the rest of the car, and needs to be spinning to apply any force on said car other than forward.

The catch, though, is that you have to be willing to accelerate at the very moment your brain would otherwise panic and tell your feet to hit the brakes. Hitting the brakes will make things considerably worse by stopping the spin on your tires (especially the fronts, which are the very tires for which spinning is absolutely essential for steering control).

(In snow, this is a little bit less severe; the deeper the snow, the more pushback on the sides of the steering tires when at an angle, which helps a little bit with steering - but not nearly as much as on a dry road, thus still necessitating being able to accelerate with those tires)

> The actual virtue is the weight of the motor over the front wheels (coefficient of friction * basically weight above tires)

This also helps, but not nearly as much as the front wheels being able to accelerate in the direction they're pointed.
Look at AOLServer, yes that AOL. https://aolserver.github.io/
What is the high level difference between Babylon.js and Three.js?
> Having said that I do think propulsive landing for crewed vehicles is pretty scary.

Not that many options for landing something that size on Mars. That’s what’s really driving many of the design choices.
Recommend to encode sub-audible tracking symbols in synthesize speech patterns that includes GPS, IP, timestamp, country of origin. We do that already in bootleg movies so we can apply similar methods in synthesizes speech.
(setq decent t)
(setq great nil)
Oh yeah that would look cool…

Possibly transparent faces of the cube with a particular `mix-blend-mode` that leaves the background color alone but dims letters that get behind it?

(That's just a wild guess, I don't know if it's actually possible.)
Thanks for the reference! Being supplied through GCP is very applicable for me.
I saw your quote. It doesn't say how much, or the terms of the government help. Is it billions? Or was it much less? And did Tesla have to pay it back?

You are being disingenuous here - to claim that detailing the grants and subsidies that the companies took and determining whether the sky is blue are the same category is bad faith, sorry. I'm actually personally familiar with SpaceX's finances to a degree and am not aware of any significant grants or subsidies. I'm not just just challenging you to be contrarian, I'm asking for evidence.

And I didn't say you said that, I said you are drafting off of the narrative, the same way a bike rider drafts off the rider in front of them.
It's unfortunate that you weren't able to throw another election with a last-minute non-story, but it might be time to get over it.
Bitcoin !== crypto, and there are a lot of blockchains whose founding teams are far from libertarian.

Also, please point me to the places where the white paper espouses libertarianism?

The bitcoin genesis message isn't a direct criticism, and the politics can be interpreted in different ways. One narrative is certainly libertarian-aligned (government shouldn't interfere with businesses and just let market forces drive things). But it's not the only interpretation; for example, there's an argument to be made for a message like: letting banks overextend themselves and then needing to be bailed out is a regulatory failing, and peer-to-peer digital currency offers an alternative to a system that lacks regulation that protects consumers and instead relies on corporate bailouts.

I will concede that the Venn diagram with Bitcoin maximalists and libertarians is significant. But again, Bitcoin !== crypto, and if you look at other blockchains, there's a very wide range of ideologies in the apocrypha.
> We need a serious talk about that attitude.

> It’s been systematic that each time someone says “I’d pay for a good linux”, they’re given the link as if to assume we’re not already paying.

Sorry, maybe I misunderstood what you said. You said that "you want to pay". "Wanting to pay" kind of implies that you don't pay today but you would if given an option. I simply thought you were being a jerk. Thanks for clarifying. No offence.

> You forgot that I want a nice OS in exchange.

Ah, special wishes. The guy next to you wants something that looks like ... beos. Or windows. It's all customizable. You know how it works because

> And I pay for Debian. But it’s not my desktop OS.

You don't want to, you already pay for some Linux distribution. Apologies, it's difficult to predict what you wanted to say when so much context is missing :)
I guess we can both agree that they're cheap.
Not just claws, but feet! I also like the ouroborous nature of the snake becoming the scroll, or perhaps being created by its own writing.

(No, I don't know why.)
Please don't drive recklessly on public roads. Take it to a track if you want to go 'hot'. You'll have more fun and not put others in danger.
This is just residual due to pre-covid working trends inflating prices in city centers over decades. Pretty clear the trend going forward is for deflation in the previously dense/working urban areas relative to areas such as the Sunbelt.

Either policy adapts in these areas to be accommodative for general living, and not simply a hub and spoke office commuting model, or the people leave and area fails to prosper.

Hawaii, NYC and some others likely to stay supported due to already being great places to live for other reasons beyond work.
>> Plus, it's stealing pieces of the Space Shuttle, which was developed in the 70s over a long period of time.

That is not always a bad thing. I mean you typed this on a computer running an ISA that started in the 70's or 80's. Maybe 90's if you are on PowerPC ;)
If you want my solution, here's roughly what I would do:

Victimless crime: basically no penalty for this, most of it should be eliminated as crime. Maybe a small fine or education at the worst.

Non-violent crime: Goal is restitution. Income or benefits are deducted to make the victim whole, probably with punitive damages to the victim as well. Basically no jail except in willful attempt to avoid restitution to victim, and perhaps not even then.

Violent crime: Most cases rehabilitation, plus restitution to victims. Prison is close to Norway type system for violence not resulting in dismemberment/death/permanent brain damage.

First instance of brutal violent crime to one victim: Norway type rehabilitation.

Repeated rape, repeated murder conviction, repeated molestation of children, repeated brutal life-disabling violence: Trial, exhaustive appeals, bullet to the head.

Mass murder of innocents: Trial, exhaustive appeals, then a bullet to the head.
I'll tell you I would love if emacs could take over text box input for firefox.

This goes double for crufty enterprise apps that use editor-in-the-browser panes that get in the way or lose data.
I may have gotten the president wrong (I was 95% sure it's named after Jackson until I Googled it), but the word "Jacksonian" was meant to refer to the addition of bureaucracy to a process to make it cost more to do it, and thus discourage people. I guess I should have said "red tape" instead...

Either it's a really obscure usage of the word or I got the president wrong.
Plenty of people in the US drive under the influence of drugs or alcohol despite that they could face felony charges.
Decentralization always makes things more complicated, but not always better.
My version of the "git is hard to use" is because so much of it doesn't feel intuitive. I use it literally every day and can use the 5 commands you list with almost zero thought at all. They probably account for about 90% of my usage and everything is fine. But then... I need to fix a merge that has gone wrong, recover a commit that a mistakenly removed in a squash, delete a remote branch, undo a bisect that I mistakenly flagged as good/bad, or any number of the things that I've had to do multiple times that make up the other 10% of my usage. And absolutely none of them can I remember how to do, nor do I have any confidence that I could stumble onto the correct syntax. The interface just isn't ergonomic. And so I inevitably turn to google/stackoverflow.

I can't think of any other examples of something I use so much where I have this problem. Conversely I had to use the Docker and Heroku CLIs recently, having used neither for probably a year or so, and managed to remember/stumble my way through pretty easily without the need to look up help or external sources.
(I agree with you.)
This is getting quite a bit more attention than we expected.

For HN readers who are interested, we are currently building a hosting, deployment and auth service for Evidence projects - Evidence Cloud.

Evidence Cloud is currently onboarding customers in private beta - for early access, join the waitlist here: https://du3tapwtcbi.typeform.com/to/kwp7ZD3q
How can I self publish? With OIDC? I own my own domain, how do I get PyPI to trust it?
No need to worry about Ruby language; it's in Appendix and covers pretty much what you need to know.

https://shop.jcoglan.com/building-git/contents.pdf
used Cargo van
There's an old saying that goes: Time is money.

It means you buy other peoples' time with your money so you don't have to spend your own time. Conversely, you spend your own time so you don't have to buy other peoples' time with your money.
What does $100k feel like?
Yeah, or like the SpaceX test flight was actually a success and they secretly happy about it haha
Rear-wheel energy recapture is surely fine so long as you are braking normally. Similar to driving a rear wheel drive car and just using engine braking.

Yes, when braking strongly rear wheels alone certainly don’t have enough traction: signs of strong front wheel braking are the nose of the car starts to dip and your passengers are complaining! Similar issue with slippery surfaces and no ABS (regenerative traction control)?

I would be interested to see some real-world figures of how often rear-wheel-only regenerative braking hits limits and wastes power.

In addition, are there limits to the amount of power regenerative braking can push into the batteries? I presume that even on front-wheel regenerative braking, when heavy braking occurs the front calliper is engaged and energy is lost. The theoretical difference between front and rear regeneration might not matter in practice?

Disclaimer: I don’t know much about this, and I suspect you are technically correct, but my guess is that it doesn’t matter in reality, and other constraints/costs/benefits matter more for deciding on front vs rear wheel drive.
What happens if eventually this is the only way of exchanging API tokens?
To me, this is kind of like saying "this $5000 Armani suit feels the same as a $500 suit from Men's Warehouse". They're only the same if you ignore the details, like living in one of the areas of the country with the nicest weather and best access to nature (California) or having access to the best culture, best food and most opportunity to make it big (New York).
> Yeah, fractional reserve lending is fraud but it’s legal fraud so what are you going to do?

Isn’t that obvious? We’re living in an increasingly oppressive regime, and fractional reserve banking is but one of its many symptoms. So we’re going to do whatever people do under oppressive regimes.

First step though is awareness.
I absolutely get not wanting to leave the terminal, I'm the same. And I wanted to like Emacs for that. But it's just really slow, and the moment you have a number of buffers with lots of content it's hardly usable. And don't get me started on its terminal emulators, anything with lots of outputs will show on screen at x0.5 speed. I compare with tmux for changing context and it's night and day.
> The /r/fuckcars folks are being a little dishonest here. As another commenter mentioned, this is like asking a vegan for steak recommendations at a restaurant.

The subreddit is specifically named 'fuck cars'. How exactly are they being dishonest? This is more like r/vegan showing how a vegan meal is better than a steak meal along some dimension, say, environmental impact.

> I live in an urban area close enough to the forest, lakes, and pastures to see all of these uses frequently.

In fact I would say that you are the one being somewhat dishonest by (implicitly) claiming both the benefits of being able to use it as a utilitarian workhorse, and in an urban area. If the trucks have the majority of their utility as contracting, construction, or towing, they should require being licensed as a commercial driver, and potentially be banned from being operated on city roads due to the danger they pose to smaller vehicles and pedestrians.

Think of the argument from that subreddit (and me) this way -- if you are driving a huge farm tractor, you cannot also bring said tractor into the city center. Not all heavy machinery needs to be allowed everywhere. Obviously you might not agree, but I think the argument is fundamentally honest.
No API, I'm just using another script I wrote previously

https://github.com/orsifrancesco/instagram-without-api-node
I wonder to what extent the Newton-Rhapson strategy plays nicer with big fancy reordering/pipelining/superscalar chips. It has more little instructions to shuffle around, so my gut says it should be beneficial, but the gut can be misleading for this kind of stuff.

Also,

-funsafe-math-optimizations

Fun, safe math optimizations should be turned on by default! ;)
Please read my statements carefully. You have no reason to assume I didn't search for this data. I found all kinds of things on EV credits and government contracts, but that's not what I'm talking about. I couched my words specifically elsewhere in this thread: "requested and received significant grants and subsidies specifically for them", e.g. not EV credits and government contracts, and not small one-off grants and discounts. This is not so easy to find, and the distinction is important and relevant to how we should look at them. Just making abstract claims without backing data in context is a waste of everyone's time.
Ironically the law pretty much everywhere in north America mandates that bikes have at least a rear brake.
wantarray() is a sensing operation that allows a type of transparent function overloading: Oh you wanted just a scalar? OK.

Python's ordered arguments mixed with out of order labeled arguments is worse IMO: Tell me arguments in this order. Or not... I mean, you could just tell me which they are. Wait, I got two of these... F*ck this, I quit
That's fantastic to hear - thank you! Looking forward to checking out your overview
>You can even see replies here stating opinions that people with long covid are crazy, or that it's a "them" problem and nobody else should have to lift a finger or change any aspect of their lives for them

To be fair, it is a them problem, as in it is literally their problem.

I totally agree that nobody should be treated with hostility, but that doesn't change matters. Why exactly should someone else have to lift a finger or change their lives? They can ask for accommodations, and people can choose to give them. They should not get to unilaterally force and expect compliance.

People have problems, but they're not necessarily other people's problems

Mini, if not most, people will willingly help others within reason. The second that people in need start demanding help and that others must do as they say, most people will classify them as enemies
I live in a tiny rural town in NY. There's 20 import mini-trucks for sale at the main street intersection. Most of the farms around here seem to have one. They're very useful.
> I thought the standard conspiracy theory was that they started making them larger to avoid environmental regulation (which is pretty ironic).

Why is it a conspiracy theory?

I'd love to cite GA's Clean Air Act as an example but the rule around qualified vehicles has been amended 11 times since it was enacted in 1996 and I can't figure out how to see previous versions of the rule.

https://rules.sos.ga.gov/gac/391-3-20-.03
I think the "someone" was Dennis Montgomery, and he conned Lindell. Montgomery was the source of the data (see RG's thread).

Montgomery has a history of cons. During the war on terror, Montgomery claimed he had software that could decode secret al-Qaeda messages in Al Jazeera broadcasts, faked a bunch of demonstrations, and got contracts for tens of millions out of the Pentagon and CIA before the jig was up.

Montgomery avoids the spotlight but he seemingly rakes it in. Lindell even bought the guy a house.

https://www.wired.com/2009/12/montgomery-2/

https://www.salon.com/2021/09/03/mike-lindell-paid-millions-...
A mainframe style system is a couple of things that the x86 ecosystem is only recently started to get. Some of these (not every "mainframe" had every feature in this list)

* nested virtualization -- anything can run inside anything inception style (IBM; maybe others)

* smart peripherals -- hey storage get me this record! hey terminal send me the whole message when the user's done typing it out! (most of them)

* binary abstraction -- your code is compiled by a bytecode of some sort that's dragged along to abstract decades of underlying hardware changes (IBM, burroughs, probably others)

I think there's a bunch of stuff that's unique to unix that people just presume "this is the way" but since I'm mostly stuck in that universe I can't give a quick overview of all the wonky things that are totally alien to unix but totally normal to other systems.
It could be in the venn diagram, "stuff rosywoozlechan has written in the past 10 years" and "really interesting stuff" do not intersect.
We have had lisp machines, but I don't know of any that run e-lisp specifically.
actually the JSON I get from Instagram (by https://github.com/orsifrancesco/instagram-without-api-node) just gives me the images ordered by size.. the first one of the array is always the biggest (but the quality is never amazing)
The problem is this is getting stuck on trying to find some spanning set of literal concepts which spans possible topics in natural language. It gets stuck at that first level. Just pick a restricted domain of conversation for the sake of doing the linguistically interesting part first, then go back and extend the domain until it is general.

He is on to something. You can implement something like LZ77 compression using the FOIL rules of ordinary parenthesis. Namely, you can use the distributive law to implement repeated string elimination. Instead of a back reference to the repeated string you have [repeated string]*(substring1 + substring2 + substring3...) where each substring is the insertion point. Apply recursively as needed. Inevitably, to compress optimally, you need enough tools to express any possible pattern as any possible pattern might be present. But if any possible pattern is reachable, oops you've got a Turing machine.

So my thesis statement here is the first layer up in natural language beyond the literals is the compression/entropy reduction/computation layer. This is the part of language which works pretty much like a programming language. The trick isn't just that it can express any literal thing, but that it can build expressions for any possible set of literal things in the domain. The layer after that is the social layer. The conversational protocol words, somewhat similar to HTTP request verbs but without implicitly assuming a client-server type relation pre-defined purpose to interaction. If you want to see how natural language ticks, skip the ground floor at first.

Here's my pet project which lead me to these ideas:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ws2IDqjENOBAQbOfK55XcuAl...
Microsoft Research was a partner in the joint collaboration. Pretty sure this was the research that culminated in the T-Detect Lyme product that Adaptive Biotech launched last year (definitely some Adaptive representation in the publication).

https://investors.adaptivebiotech.com/news-releases/news-rel...
It bothers me how much the state chooses to defend the idea that it doesn’t make mistakes. All while the actual perpetrators are still in society.

They’re trying to defend their decision to keep someone in prison, just so that it doesn’t change bootlickers perspective, instead of protect the public.
Still don't need such a tall and long front bumper for any of those uses.
Measuring blood sugar non-invasively from the ear canal
The US market never carries vehicles that executives don't think will sell well in the US market, or that may lower their brand's perceived value, or take money away from a hot-selling model... We always get the shit cars with the shit mileage and less functionality. Some of that is due to regulatory or trade issues, but mostly they just think it will cut into their sales of a more expensive car they already have here. Also, dealerships are bastards.
PyPI’s existing API tokens are probably a better fit for your use case, and already support “self” publishing (since that’s the default; everything in this blog post is about delegating trust away).