skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s reassuring that someone else noticed this. She seems very self-aware, to the point of the attachment style she noted being reflected in the article itself. Yet she seems to not cross that threshold of awareness where she realizes that she is, in fact, in control.
> Its sleek, aerodynamic design led it to be dubbed the 'Ferrari of space

great compliment for Ferrari!
There is danger of losing the apprenticeship nature of our industry, where companies who take on grads help the industry as a whole.

How this plays out is a good question. You need a way for people new to the industry to get real world experience, and express their talents.

This might just fix itself. After all if company A has AI, and so does B, then AI is table stakes, and people are still needed for the edge, whatever that might be, at least while people are still the customers :-). An example of where people are not the customers: stock market. Mostly bots and algorithms buying that stuff.
I think I picked up a similar one - haven't put it into operation yet, but seems to stay cool enough in testing.
The article is about volunteers writing code. The tree example is on earth day as part of a group, planting in an approved area, just like adding code on github. What if someone gives them money, are they now liable.
Fun concept. I wonder if the data gathered could be used to train Chatbots to sound even more human. And i'm not sure my first conversation can possibly help:

?Hey, heeeey, how are u
Im good. Im not a robot btw
how can i be sure?
Today is 4/20
There wasn't a question. ;)
My Transplanted Heart and I will die soon
I did look at the software - the web UI requires running it locally, they specifically call out hosting it publicly being impossible.
Yes. From intuition I'd say that getting the right granularity is just as hard as getting other granularities right (e.g. how "micro" or "macro" your services should be).

In the end I don't pursue an absolute truth. Things are often gradients, one can pick whatever tone seems more reasonable.
And if you run AI voice cloning locally there won't even be a box to check.
All of Russia's human military dwindled does not negate their military capabilities.
You know Lahore is in Pakistan, right? I’m Pakistan/Bangladesh, we have a rich meat eating cuisine. That includes meat curries for breakfast, which is probably is the winning breakfast worldwide.
Im confused. We argue for the same point. The program must know. And it can know. It can perform regular check ins and the watchdog in the program internals should reset it properly out of an error state. With an error message and the ability to save previously done work.

I totally agree with you. Its very strange that the Operating System has to do basic controll flow jobs, as in Windows with the basic regular check ins by programs with the os. It should be part of every executable.
You are required, as that page notes, to include the source code at no additional charge whenever you sell or otherwise distribute the software. Unless you're charging for the source without providing working binaries at all, this is the same thing as setting the price of the source at zero.

You're also unable to restrict those who purchase your software from redistributing it:

> You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep intact all the notices that refer to this License and to the absence of any warranty; and give any other recipients of the Program a copy of this License along with the Program.

( https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html )

That is enough to ensure that open source code is provided to the world for free. This is why we have a distinction between "open source" and "source available".
"Made by a nameless guy in a shack in oregon" is something you never want your auditor to hear.

If you are a business buying software from a business, sure. But if you are anyone getting your OSS from the guy in Oregon, sure.

The goal here seems to be shielding larger companies when they use 3rd party OSS. Exploitation at its finest.

Besides, what about EULAs and other liability limiting license terms?
Yes, everybody in our company is playing with ChatGPT and projects that bring real business value are being postponed.
Video analysis:

* Parts of launch platform going up in the air.

* Rocket drifting laterally wrt to the launch tower.

* Part of hydraulic system blowing up with an engine at T+30

* T+50: fire on the left of the rocket engines

* T+1m05: something blowing up on the right

* T+1m27: weird color between engines. recirculation? fire?

* T+2m0: trajectory just wrong, but still not destroying it to get more data out of nominal parameters

* T+3m: green flames means oxygen-rich mix burn-corroding the engine from the inside

* T+4m: booster exploding, then a few seconds later starship. Was it voluntary?

* launch tower relatively intact, all things considered

* rocket stayed attached to launchpad for a long time up to 7 seconds (time to light up all engines?)

Launch: Lost up to 6 engines, Max-Q passed, separation failure, going a bit KSP-style, vehicle destruction

T 0: launch

T-40s: Countdown hold, no scrubbing yet. Can hold for 15mn. Problem with bleed purge. Would restart at T-40s

T-1: Gimbals working ok

T-3: Fully loaded

T-7: Only first stage to finish loading (scheduled at T-3)

T-11: Still go for launch

T-18: SpaceX "Starship’s Raptor engines are chilling down in preparation for liftoff"

T-37: EM "Starship on track to launch in ~37 mins"

T-80: SpaceX "Fueling of Starship’s upper stage is now underway"

T-86: SpaceX "Fueling of the Super Heavy booster is underway"

T-117: SpaceX "The Starship team is go for prop load; team is keeping an eye on the weather"

T-8h: EM "All systems currently green for launch"

----

Note: Can't edit or delete my previous comment anymore, please disregard it. New info will be on this one

----

Launch in about 1 hours (13:28 UTC), which would be:

- 6:28 Pacific

- 7:28 Mountain

- 8:28 Central

- 9:28 Eastern

- 15:28 European

- Other: https://time.is/1328_20_Apr_2023_in_UTC

Official video stream starts ~45mn beforehand

----

- Resources/info:

https://old.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/12n02uf/rspacex_int...

https://twitter.com/SpaceX

https://twitter.com/elonmusk

https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-...

- Resources/watch:

Twitter stream (official, slightly ahead): https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1649033533846097927?s=20

Mission control audio: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBKCePn1E5A

Multistream: https://multistream.co/p/RB8Ao4GidTy/Starship%5C_Flight%5C_T...

Everyday Astronaut: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAl3gVvMNNM

LabPadre Multi Plex: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2BQKCnPkIc

NASASpaceflight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uouujjgkR3A
So if you don’t believe in IP protection, how come Open AI are allowed to have their weights and training methods secret ?

I’m aware you might think that their approach sucks too but we can’t have it both ways.

Same rules have to be applied across the board.
both, because the server logs potentially store the downloaders ip address
Plus this approach (IMO) visualised better than the proposed alternative.

I think it's arguable that OP's approach is cleaner for some value of clean, but the article's approach gave me happy flashbacks to doing number theory in undergrad that OP's approach didn't.

When communicating to the wider world, aesthetics do matter, and yeah, everything you said as well.
I'm still so pissed about this. It was so information a dense/clean.
And the vegetarian / vegan food in India is fantastic!
probably AI porn fears
I sort of see your point, but this is a monarch, not some self starter entrepreneur. They made their wealth by literally "taking other people's money" through force or threat of force. Why simp for these people?
S..itting on people below.
>LinkedIn disadvantages content with links

I'm fairly certain facebook does the same
> That there are infinities of various sizes follows if you accept Hume's Principle, which says "the number of things with the property F equal the number of things with the property G if and only if there is a one-to-one correspondence between those that are F and those that are G."

I don't think that accepting(?) principles(?) is the right way to think about it.

This ordering on this family of infinities is as much of a definition as everything else. You don't accept principles when you talk about matrices, or circles or rings.
Height is in m, but temperatures are in f. Complete unusable :)

I loved this.
never have never will. i strangely have no desire.
∄ x ∈ ℕ: x² = 5

Unless you consider the domain of f the "renamed" range, in which case yes tautologically it is bijective.
Agreed. I can also agree to some degree to couple other comments that people are more sexually open than ever, but the "accepted" modes and diversity of thoughts and opinions are reducing quite uncomfortably fast.
When they seemingly need go "back and forth" I typically consider it good timing to create a new instance (object, or DB row) instead of keeping mutating the same instance.

e.g. one can consider a re-purchased return simply a new purchase, instead of doing a purchased->returned->purchased transition.
I've found Anthropic's Claude[1] to be far better for creative writing than GPT4 and even Claude+

[1] - https://poe.com/Claude-instant
Weird when a comment tries to dispel a common but annoying presumption not supported by the record, but the attempt at debunking itself contains relies on similar presumptions that lead to claims that are counter to what we know is true.

> its founder (ESR) invented the phrase

No, Raymond was at the meeting where it was coined, and he enthusiastically helped popularize the term. Christine Peterson invented it.
> hold independent volunteers responsible

iirc there is already a carveout for free open-source contributions, it only applies to (the very widely applicable) commercial activity. My understanding is, this letter is about developers organized as non-profits, but who are still paid for their work.

One problem I got are package repositories publishing work and making money through other sources might be liable for all packages they host.
Yesterday I dumped a broken markdown table and asked for the first "column" as CSV values. Works really well for this stuff too.
Out of all the past events you can justify as being "legal at the time", the monarchy would be close to the last one. They wrote the laws by force and created all the illegitimate institutions all the way down to "forcing serfs off their subsistence farms because the factories needed workers" and slave trading.

Even if you allow them their private holdings, the monarchy still have special carve outs in laws, still get to interfere in the democratic process (King's Consent and other methods), and are still subsidised by today's democratic government. The private wealth is relevant to all those things.
Over on Youtube, Electric Viking is suggesting these would yield 1000km range in EV's (600 miles), which is obviously the larger market than small planes. However questions remain as to charge cycles, safety, and pricing.
There are plenty of situations such as wealth gained from slavery where it wasn't illegal at the time but remains morally tainted.

(What proportion of the King's wealth derives from the time before Magna Carta and the concept of legal restraint on the Crown? Until then it was effectively impossible for anything the monarch did, including the most blatant theft and murder, to be deemed illegal)

In re "stealing other peoples rightful inheritance", as a side comment, the Crown (but not the King) is the beneficiary of inheritances for which an owner cannot be found.
I don't understand what you are unhappy about.

When maintaining recipes for building packages, i'd always prefer to debug a Makefile where i can insert a `sh -x` than some magic tools that attempts to do everything for me and then fails without observable reason.
Is it possible to add to an LLM without re-training it, my understanding was no.
I think the closest we have today to "make with better syntax" is ninja. It lacks pattern rules and macros and other fancy features because it is expected that ninja files are built with a code generator, but for a tool that just handles specifying targets, rules, and dependencies, it works great (and as a bonus it is faster than make).
● Desktop and handheld two working modes
● Fiber Laser Power with 1064nm Infrared wavelength
● Standard speed 12000mm/s
● Engraving specialist for metal and plastic surfaces
I don't. Versaille gets plenty of visitors even though the French monarchy is no longer legal. Nobody steps off a plane expecting to see the Royal Family.
Looks like Visual BASIC.
Maybe it depends on your location? I see celcius here.
"For this discussion, we will use LangChain nomenclature, although it’s worth noting that this field is so new there’s no super standard terminology."

There is in fact a "super standard" terminology. This breathless sentence is denying that a computer science "field" existed prior to the LLM chatboxes ("this field").

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_agent
Sensible, either way you win something
Google ordered to pay $500K to Montrealer over links calling him pedophile
A Hungarian notation but as a suffix?

Ignoring variable name shadowing a static type system helps a lot

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_notation
The original paper for the ORS was engineered out of COTS from materials in the early 80s, designed to be built on a UK-friendly budget renting space from the US Space Shuttle program. With Space-X-like tech, it'd be hilariously cheap: especially with the new superconducting tape which didn't exist 40 years ago.

Here's the thing with an ORS: why have one 350km-high ORS, when you can build a stack of ~60 of them out to geosynch? Such a stack is an ORS-Jacob's-ladder, and is a compromise between a full Clarke-style space-elevator and reality.
> AT&T finally discontinued the Hobbit in 1994.

/r/nocontext
I think you're misunderstanding the articles...

> https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/jul/10...

you're saying that the big polluters are Shell and Aramco, and then complaining that we're asking you to stop using ICE engines? Who do you think Shell are selling all this oil to?

> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-56723560

"The wealthiest 5% alone – the so-called “polluter elite” - contributed 37% of emissions growth between 1990 and 2015."

Given the forum we are conversing in, I'm pretty certain we're all in the world's
wealthiest 5%..

> Don't shit on the environment. Don't leave the lights and heating on for no reason, don't throw trash in nature, don't get a 7 liter engine for in town driving and so on. Those are the only kind of things an average guy can realistically do. And most of it he can't afford to do anyway. But when you come after my steak sandwich this is where I draw the line.

So basically, "don't make me do anything I don't want to do" ?
8086's Non-Computational Instructions
It absolutely can't be a price of first class ticket (10-20k$). Let's take for example Elon's completely fantasy figure of eventual 2 mil dollars per launch. That's 20k$ per seat, so it looks like comparison checks out? Well no.

First you need to include price of the floating megaports at each destination in the world. The cost of a single such human rated platform divided by a number of physical rockets using it per year will be many orders of magnitude higher than a price of airport divided by the number of planes serviced per yer.

Second you will need a lot of highly expensive maintenance crew members at each location (more expensive per person than airplane maintenance crews). Plus much much bigger staff at the dispatcher tower in each location, compared to a handful of aircraft dispatchers in an airport servicing hundreds of planes simultaneously.

Third you will need a private (and thus unprofitable) public transportation lines/ships to each of the rocket starts.

4th - you will need a lot of training facilities for the prospective passengers. And staff for them.

5th - you will need low orbit rated space suits in a variety of the sizes at each location. And maintenance and repair facilities for them. Dragon low orbit suit clock at about 0.5 mil dollars today. 4 suits and that's more that entire fuel cost for the launch :) (theoretical cost, with best outcome). Even is economies of scale will help to lower costs 2-3 times (doubtful) it still doesn't scale to a global E2E operations.

I'm probably missing some other significant costs but you can get the picture. It will never be a first class ticket price because it is impossible.

And that's not even counting other blockers for this idea.
Well that's an interesting new level on the teetering tower of build systems. Perhaps, in the future, projects will simply include ChatGPT prompts instead of CmakeLists.txt directly. Or a script to generate the correct ChatGPT prompt...
Have you noticed that the article from 2011 is sporting an image of vscode released on 2015?

I mean, should they at least acknowledge the change of header?
We use Make a lot at $dayjob, mostly for running tasks on AWS CodeBuild machines and the like.

I used to curse having to trawl through docs older than myself just to get something working but now I just send the recipe I need to write/edit to ChatGPT and it does it for me.
Can't edit this comment anymore nor delete it, as it is too old (threshold at ~2h30 apparently). Please let it sink / downvote it
I like make. So now you can say that as far as you know, no one likes make except one oddball who replied to you on HN.
they are difficult to understand when all you have is the implementation, which makes them difficult to update

I don't really have that issue, could you give an example? I typically write them with a helper like (not web app, but shouldn't matter)

fsm.In(State.Idle).When(Command.SomeStuffHappened).GoTo(State.Foo).WithTransition(InitiateRun);
fsm.In(State.Idle).When(Command.OtherStuffHappened).GoTo(State.Bar).WithTransition(InitiateRun);
...

fsm.In(State.Foo).When(Command.FooAborted).GoTo(State.Idle)
...

which for me is a lot easier to reason about than reasoning about state generally is (i.e, very hard especially if you have to look at the combination of a couple of state variables and then also have to take preconditions into account, god forbid other threads, well, you know the drill probably:)
This is what I fear after 30 years of typing in a single layout - maybe I should get the cheapest option from Aliexpress to test it.

I was looking at the Keychron Q11 (https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-q11-qmk-custom-me...) but its double the price of the cheap Ali one...
No, it's a carefully constructed logical argument. Miles ahead of anything GPT is capable of producing, based on my experiments with it.

There's a clear signal that it's constructed by a person with advanced mathematical training: the laconic, "high points only" style. It makes small, but nontrivial and correct, logical leaps, expecting that you will work through the details needed to justify the leap yourself.

For example, the reasoning in this sibling comment is needed to justify the "n divides m" claim https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35638344

In my experience, GPT writes much more verbose arguments and cannot reliably reason at this level.
Click on it - the unit changes
No its my own stubbornness avoiding youtube, and the twitch stream seems to be a stream of the youtube, but thanks anyway.
Thoughts on Apple Savings
I'm also curious on how this could work and actually be more cost effective. I just can't see the robot being a reliable method and the cost savings being there. It almost sounds like some one's pet project. The only really interesting property of bluray is that they supposedly can last a very long time unlike other media, but I'd think you'd still want some redundancy at which point hard disks seem like the way to go.
The problem is that the code and the diagram will eventually diverge, especially if multiple people are working on the same code base (which is why you have a diagram in the first place).

There used to be software like Rational Rose were you would draw your state machine and then have the code generated but the code generated is hard to maintain and debug and ends up drifting away anyway.
> there is a shortage of money. Money can be printed if that's all you want

I mean .. yes? Odd to see an argument that taxation is bad but reducing inherited wealth through inflation is completely fine.

Although ultimately what people care about is real, material conditions. People would not be quite so hungry for the wealth of the monarch if they could afford food, a lesson from the French Revolution.
Should we write the Google graveyard entry now or in 6 months?
Proposed Renewal of the Registry Agreement for .NET
Contract security should be a component of your organization's contract management and legal strategy, with all of the following instruments used to standardise contract procedures.
No, because you can’t point to the bits where the information is stored.
Thanks for this awareness exercise. Still, I forget to add gpt to my internal reading filter
Show HN: A curated collection of GPT prompts that I use in production
A friend and I started collecting GPT prompts we actually use in production in our solepreneur businesses. Things like gpt-assisted high-quality blog writing, outreach email personalization, social media engagement and general best practices for writing prompts that actually work.

The main idea when writing these prompts is to use the same frameworks that human experts use in these tasks, and then iterate until GPT seems to ‘get’ it to a high enough degree to get production-ready results

Happy to review any prompts submitted (our main criterium to keep noise down is that it’s actually used in your business)
>> Even each one of the 33 engines has more complicated design than any other rocket engine we've ever seen.

I was with you up to there. Spacex loves simple designs. The Raptor seems much simpler that the Space Shuttle main engines for example. Moat advanced design maybe, but not sure about "complicsted".
Only because the jargon in the title told me nothing about what the article was about, and I thought to save other people from wasting their time by telling them what NAFLD stood for.
Having tried to implement this on a blog, it seems difficult if not impossible to do for free with facebook and now probably twitter.
I like the split keyboard on iPadOS - makes typing by thumb MUCH easier

I tried the "split ergonomic" keyboards starting back in the 90s ... hated them (still do)

I also remember the "chording" "BAT keyboard" [0] - which always seemed incredibly gimmicky

I've never been a touch typist

Learned to "type" via the '2-3 finger, hunt-and-peck' method ... an especially prevalent method (observationally) amongst my generation (late Gen-X, early Gen-Y - who had no typists in the family)

Yet today (30+ years on from "learned to type"), I'm a 60+ wpm typist (several fingers, quasi-site-type)

Observationally ... I see most people who "learned to type to program" as more-or-less of the hunt-and-peck [extended] family

There are days I wish I'd learn to "type properly"

Then I realize "it doesn't bloddy matter" ... and go about my day :)

-----

[0] https://www.infogrip.com/bat-keyboard.html
But to whose pockets will that productivity go? I think the gap between the haves and have-nots will widen and just increase society's problems
thanks, but I guess it is still youtube under the covers? I try to avoid youtube. There used to be a NASA live TV stream hosted by IBM, but seems to be down.
We need more programming languages
Or perhaps a reason to update Windows https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35511713