Show HN: AI view of Goldilocks vs. Red Riding Hood re: talking animals
Since last I tried this the chatbot has improved in conversational skills. It can interpret indirect comments and observations and respond thoughtfully without a real question being stated. It's not so shallow as it once was, thinking beyond the question to the history and related topics.

Prompt:It would be fun to hear what red riding hood and goldilocks thought about anthropomorphic animals

As an AI language model, I can imagine what Red Riding Hood and Goldilocks might think about anthropomorphic animals, based on their respective stories and characters.

Red Riding Hood, as a character, might be skeptical and cautious of anthropomorphic animals, given her past experiences with talking animals. In the classic story, she encounters a talking wolf who disguises himself as her grandmother to trick her. This encounter might make her wary of trusting any animals that display human-like qualities or intelligence.

On the other hand, Goldilocks might be more open-minded and intrigued by anthropomorphic animals. In her story, she is not afraid to enter a house that belongs to a family of bears, who can walk, talk, and live like humans. Goldilocks shows curiosity and even tries the bears' beds, chairs, and porridge. She might view anthropomorphic animals as fascinating and potentially friendly creatures.

It's also worth noting that both Red Riding Hood and Goldilocks are fictional characters whose reactions to anthropomorphic animals can vary depending on the context and the storyteller's interpretation.

Prompt:Odd that neither one has any issue with animals talking

You raise a valid point. It is indeed odd that both Red Riding Hood and Goldilocks do not seem to be too surprised or alarmed by animals talking in their respective stories. However, it's important to remember that these stories are fairy tales and fables, which often employ magical or fantastical elements that are not bound by the laws of the real world.

In fairy tales, animals are often depicted as possessing human-like qualities such as intelligence, emotions, and speech, which serves to enhance the storytelling and create a sense of wonder and awe. In the context of these stories, the fact that animals can talk is usually accepted as a given and not questioned by the characters or the audience.

Additionally, it's worth noting that the perception of talking animals in literature and popular culture has evolved over time. Today, we might view anthropomorphic animals with a more critical eye and question the plausibility of such creatures. However, in the past, talking animals were a common trope in literature, mythology, and folklore, and were generally accepted without question.

Prompt: So we'd classify Red and Gold as characters created in the past, with perceptions evolved in a different time and place

Yes, that's a fair characterization. Red Riding Hood and Goldilocks are characters from traditional folklore and children's literature, and their stories have been told and retold over many generations, with variations in their details and interpretations.

The perception of anthropomorphic animals in literature and popular culture has indeed evolved over time, and modern audiences may have different expectations and reactions compared to audiences from the past. As such, it's important to view these characters and their stories in their historical context, while also recognizing that they continue to have enduring appeal and relevance to contemporary audiences.