skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think it is really important to clearly indicate what sort of license the service is operating under, i.e. is it credit institution, e-money institution, payment institution, or something else?
Oh boy, I don't know how I missed that detail. Sorry!
I've done some pretty involved concept work. I made this CBOR implementation that heavily uses concepts: https://github.com/absperf/conbor/blob/main/conbor/cbor.hxx (Warning: I abandoned this mid-development. It "worked" for most of my uses, but many things were dropped in mid-development)

I ended up abandoning it because recursive concepts weren't universally functioning (clang didn't support them right), and more nefariously, the C++ name definition rules made a whole lot of things very very painful. concepts were evaluated based on their definition site, not based on names available where they were expanded. This is true of templates too, but in concepts, it prevented me from allowing users to effectively extend my concepts-based library, and some circularly-dependent concepts were impossible without a dummy "Adl" type to allow ADL to function. There are a lot of little places where the extent to which concepts work is entirely dependent on their order.

In simple cases, concepts allow you to do things similarly to Rust traits and get some of those powers, but in C++, a lot of little frustrations keep it from being as ergonomic or as powerful, and you still have to play stupid C++ name lookup games.

I remember a LOT of little annoyances, as well, in trying to partially constrain concepts, or express recursive concepts (which are very necessary for parsing a recursive format like CBOR). I tried a simple JSON parser that only allowed arrays and strings using C++ concepts and hit the same kinds of problems.

I'd recommend using concepts, I think, but keep in mind that trying to do anything at all generic or extensible might cause you to do more C++ detangling than you want.
> Rocco's in the Home Depot in South Philly

For the longest while, I'd refer people to the tiny Mexican "restaurant" in the back of the gas station at the intersection of Hwy 41 & Pioneer Trail in Chaska, MN for their amazing food, so I get what you're saying.

Sadly, they are long gone!
Absolutely. I’m not a fan, just commenting on the words.
It would be reasonable to allow for the exclusive sharing or transfer of an ebook. Why can't I resell the single-copy (and thus forfeit my own use) or lend it to a friend when done (and again I would be unable to use it when it was lent until returned/timed-out)?
It got 200 upvotes and was on HN's front page for 9 hours.
Using Nix Flakes with Devbox 0.4.7
I've never even had a good experience with the zoom app on X. But it all works perfectly with the web version on both X and Wayland
I think you're referring to the SR-103 issue: https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/42725
It’s not the chase of a dopamine hit. It’s the goodness and strength of a society that recognizes the power of properly ordered human sentiments.
It should be easily possible to extend the TOTP standard, so you also have to enter a number, before you get the code.

But I think it will always be possible to do some kind of real time MITM attack, where you trick a user into accepting your fraudulent login.
That's what i don't get about all the snap complaining. If you know what a snap is, you're already an outlier. If it bothers the user so much, why don't they go straight to the source to begin with (aka Debian)? You can get to the exact same setup.
> Why did Ubuntu hit 18.04 and then decide to only make things worse in future?

Oh, ubuntu beem making decisions that many users think make things worse since it was first released

and yet it's still quite popular
Revenues mean nothing if your expenses outpace them. What's the net profit?
> requested and applied for $886 million grant from the FCC

Because FCC asked private companies to put in bids. So companies responded.

Its not that SpaceX just went to the FCC and asked for money.

> It is a matter of fact that Tesla and SpaceX have received billions of dollars of government contracts, highly preferential loans, grants, subsidies, and tax incentives.

These things have to be analyzed more systematically and in comparison to their industry.

Tesla received a lone for Model S production, both Ford and GM also received loans. Tesla paid it back, Ford and GM have not yet done so.

Tesla received intensive for factories, so do all large industrial facilities.

ZEV credits are a universal mechanism, not given preference to any automaker.

Same for EV Tax Credit, applies to all car maker.

Tesla, I would argue has received very little in direct subsidy. The loan guarantee was small (400M and paid back quickly).

A drop in the bucket compared to GM. Even foreign companies got access to EV tax credit.

I could do the same for SpaceX.

Yes, Musk companies receive government help. But so do all companies in these industry. Having a space company without close ties to government simply isn't happening right now. It would be more viable for Tesla, but the US government has been mucking around in the care industry for 100 years and their international competitors do so to.

The misinformation is that government picked winners and that Musk companies are successful because of these subsidies. That the success of Tesla and SpaceX are because of subsidies. These myths are often repeated.
One of the main points of concepts is to make template error messages much better, and for the most part it's true. Concepts error messages still suck, but they tend to suck much less than non-concept template error messages.
On the contrary, emotion is at the very core of any justice system. When we minimize crime, we are trying to minimize the psychological harm done by crime and criminals. It is "base instinct" for me to wish to avoid being punched, "base instinct" for me to wish to maintain control over my property, "base instinct" for me to want my children to grow to adulthood.

To be rational, we want to choose our goals wisely, and then act rationally and without emotion when it comes to the pursuit of those goals. Personally, my goal for the criminal justice system is not merely to minimize crime, but to ensure that justice is done.

In my opinion, if someone intentionally rapes and kills a child, for example, it is a positive good to remove them from existence. You simply do not get to commit such an act and remain on earth with the rest of us. If we lock such a person up forever, that is good. If we kill them, that is even better. To me, that's what justice means.
One example: `apt install firefox` installs the snap variant (which the user probably just uninstalled to replace it with the apt variant, as it is installed by default.)
But the vast majority of people don't want that! If there was a cost every time you visited a website, however small, there would be a constant mental load of evaluating whether each click was worth it. It would be a huge drag on the best aspect of the web.

Not to mention that coordinating it internationally would be next to impossible. Sure, you could add it as an optional feature, and a tiny percentage of people would use it, but it wouldn't make any material difference to websites' bottom lines.
General Availability of Amazon CodeCatalyst
Don't comment about being downvoted. A downvoted comment with substance often will receive compensatory upvotes.
Until they inevitably shatter as something ever so slightly sharp hits them, that it. Sure hope you're not working with a metal watch.
This is a correct, but incomplete take that I see a lot in response to the "market is going to crash, yay!" comments. It's incomplete because it assumes that every housing unit in the country is owned by a single family and, if sold, would have to be replaced by another one. These are owner occupied primary residences which are 70-80% of the market, depending on who you ask.

The remainder consists of second homes and investment properties which will get sold, if they don't make financial sense anymore, for example, when short or long term rental income drops which is already happening. Overall, it's possible for the prices to drop in the total market even if the primary residence owners swear that they will take their 3% mortgage to their grave.
How much money will they spend servicing requests for those 4.2M subscribers?
Google SSO does not support device passkeys such as Touch ID or Windows Hello. I'm sure that will change soon though
You'd be surprised what an 11 year old can understand when you talk to them like a person.
why not market wage? Prison inmates often have spouses, children, elders, and also need to save for their own retirement

If we want to rehabilitate people, we have to consider their financial wellbeing so they can reenter society when they are released, otherwise, we are just setting them up for continued failures
I think it is a bit premature to assert that the launch pad caused the engine failures.
OK NP.

While we're at it: Why does this site persist in the incredibly offensive practice of letting people waste their time typing out a question or comment and THEN telling them "oh you can't post right now." I really don't see any excuse for it.

If you can't post, the Reply button should be disabled, period. Any insight on that?

Oh, and then there's the "shadow-banning." Even more disgraceful disregard for users.
Snaps is just the latest in a long line of failed attempts to differentiate their desktop.

Give it a few years and they will switch to Flatpack.
Tell HN: NYT Discover pops up if you scroll up
Does the incessant pop-up that the NYT just added bothering other people? And is there a new plug-in someone could make to make the pop-up disappear!
The state of liability for insecure software in America is woefully bad.

You’re not going to be able to apply breach of warranty under UCC. As a threshold matter, software might not even be considered a “good” and so it might not even governed by UCC. But if you did manage to apply UCC to software, the contract or license under which software is provided would have to be incompetently drafted if it were to be found that it did not effectively disclaim liability or if it was found unconscionable. There are some additional procedural hurdles concerning probity of contract but let’s leave it there

Under basic tort law, a software provider would need to be found to have a duty of care in order to be found negligent, but surprisingly, this is seldom found to exist. There is also no clear standard to measure whether a software provider may have breached that duty. Intervening or superseding cause exists in almost every breach, although for security-specific software, this might not be the case (e.g., a firewall fails open might be reasonably foreseeable to cause damage by means of a hacker, against whom the firewall is meant to protect).

Finally even if you get to this point, recovery may be barred or limited by the economic loss doctrine.

Defective product law is even worse, due to the (inscrutable) fact that while most courts would call software a good for UCC purposes, they would not call it a product for the purposes of product defect law. There are some additional wrinkles here concerning design of software versus manufacture of software in the context of defective product design law, but we’re starting to wander out of HN post territory and into CLE territory here.

Frankly if Joe Biden wanted to change every thing I just red it would be superb but I think we have to be realistic about how much influence the federal government can apply here without causing massive terrible second and third order effects. For example look back to 43 and Obama’s heavy reliance on cybersecurity insurance to advance national security interests and how quickly that turned into free payouts for everyone who could manage to get a random reared out to work.
But interestingly enough, a lot of new vehicles are SUVs that look like lifted station wagons...

So we like the form factor of station wagon
> "Google" didn't invent anything, the employees did

No shit, way to be pedantic over a common simple abstraction. Do you want a list of every author for every thing that is ever invented when someone refers to something?
How do you handle chromium in Debian stable? It always lags behind significantly behind chromium/chrome releases.
Lots of people here who are against the dealth penalty. Why is it so hard to empathize with the victims yet so easy for them to empathize with the murderers? Murderers go on death row, not petty criminals. What's the margin for error? How many of these murderers do you think are innocent? "One is too many" is not enough to justify a complete abolition of the death penalty. Life in prison sentencing ought to be used more, in consideration of those in the margin of error.
I seriously miss compact trucks, like the Mazda B-series, Ford Courier, Ford Ranger (before it became a mid-size in 2019).

These kinds of trucks might more to your liking. Sure they aren't as small and cute as the imports, but your local auto store can still get you parts for them.

They are fun to drive, fairly fuel efficient, and are capable of hauling material from the home center. I learned to drive stick, and how to pop the clutch when you have a dead battery, in a Ford Courier on the high plains of west Texas.
This is my understanding of the issue as well--that viruses in general can have wide ranging affects depending on the person, and the symptoms of LC are not unique.

So what's notable might not be that Long Covid is a thing, but that due to how prevalent it was, a massive amount of people were subject to the ~0.1% (or whatever probability) tail risk that a given viral load would very negatively impact their body (nerve damage, heart damage, etc), much like any other virus would.
Just use goauthentik.io, it's awesome.
That is something that I know. That is why I suggested it might be cheap to explore the concept (at the bottom of my post) and part of why I'm curious to see others try. I personally have college experience in FPGA prototyping but primarily have focused my efforts on software development then and since, I wouldn't have much fun myself building an FPGA prototype of something like the 432 by myself. But if someone sent me a cute RPi-like board and an okay (doesn't have to be great) assembler/debugger for it, I'd certainly give it a try seeing if I could assemble something interesting like a compiler for a next higher-level language. If that same someone were to build enough of the boards to build an entire community of hobbyist developers more than just me, that would be even better and really interesting and the biggest reason to mention it as a curiosity on a site like this, not to do a one-off thing to scratch a personal itch but to wonder what a community of hobbyists could do together as a group.
> Given an optimizing compiler, the first function (count(a)) is likely to just immediately return the size of the backing vector. The function is nearly free.

The compiler is able to do that with count_inheritance() as well if it's able to prove which instance of iter_base is used in the call. I suppose even many experienced C++ developers are not aware of this. This optimization is known as "devirtualization" and is fairly well-implemented in Clang and GCC. It's even more effective since the advent of LTO. Some more info: https://quuxplusone.github.io/blog/2021/02/15/devirtualizati... https://blog.llvm.org/2017/03/devirtualization-in-llvm-and-c...
It didn't pelt the surrounding city, lol. And well, of course it hit infrastructure in Starbase. The concrete was beneath the launch pad at Starbase.
cool, but: this means the extension is reading all my text, in search of the word "/help", doesn't ?
Maybe, maybe not. But the point is that the system should leverage people's sentiments for the sake of minimizing crime, and not be designed the way human sentiment would want it to be designed (in this case, yours).

If retribution turns out not to minimize crime, then there's no place for it in the justice system. So the only question becomes whether or not retribution minimizes crime more than non-retribution methods.
I find your insistence that you are the rational one laughable, at best. Pedantic, to the extreme, I would give you. Rational? Nope. Children desperately hanging on to their toys. Everyone's health be damned.
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35640002
> and don't like Debian

why might somebody not like Debian?
Obviously, this "disease" joins all the other psychosomatic ones. So nothing new.
It's almost as if copyright law, tailored to a specific medium, doesn't translate effortlessly to another, newer, completely different one!

Skeuomorphic reductionism has outstayed its welcome on both sides of the debate, I'm afraid.
> Deterrence and retribution are tightly linked.

This is very much not the case.

"Deterrence" solely operates on future actors. "Retribution" on those who have already transgressed. We know that the vast vast vast majority of crimes are not committed with a cost-benefit analysis. So no matter how badly you punish the criminals will you prevent most crimes. No man willing to kill his cheating wife thinks "Well, I could 15, 17 tops, sure, but 25 is too much. Okay, I need a new plan".
I'll take the theoretical chance of an "epidemic of minitruck highway deaths" over the current reality of an epidemic of traffic fatalities made worse by cars and trucks getting heavier, taller, and deadlier.
In architecture school, we were taught that drawing is a powerful tool for thinking and analysis, and were drilled with different techiniques to articulate our ideas quickly and concisely in an image. Our professors were heavily influenced by the Bauhaus school in this line of thinking (i.e. Paul Klee[1]).

[1] http://ing.univaq.it/continenza/Corso%20di%20Disegno%20dell%...
I have no experience with MS AAD, but I saw something similar with GWorkspace. The TOTP option is not shown by default, you need to add a security key (e.g. YubiKey) or maybe (never tested) an Android phone. You can then add a TOTP, remove the other method and continue using TOTP.

Maybe MS AAD has something similar? Then temporarily using a throwaway profile on a phone might be enough to get around that.
All you can ever do is the best that you can under the circumstances. Avoiding a wrongful execution is just one goal. Other goals include the ability of the innocent to enjoy life and the need for justice against wrongdoers.
I disagree. Ads are fine as long as they're actually just passive ads. Sometimes they even show me things I want to buy! It's the surveillance and general impunity around responsibility with people's data that is problematic.
From someone who’s been down the rabbit hole: don’t.
"Take a break while you get ready for the next exercise:"
> ...some rando in his basement couldn't write a good compiler for it like they could with C, BASIC, Pascal, Fortran, LISP...

I see Ada as having a fundamentally different philosophy from languages like C and BASIC. Ada compilers were allowed to not implement all of the standard library features, and many didn't.

> ...such a huge compiler for a new language is doomed to be buggy, especially at first...

Was this actually what happened though? There was always the Ada Conformity Assessment Test Suite (ACATS), which tested a compiler's implementation. If compilers ever hindered Ada's adoption, it wasn't because they were buggy, it was how expensive and resource intensive they were.

> There were promises that the code would be safe, and that if it compiled it should just work, but the buggy nature of the compilers undercut these promises...

...except that it did kind of work in the end though, didn't it? Ada is still very widely used in a lot of places, and has been for a long time. Lots of new code is still being written in Ada too. There's lots of literature available about how well Ada integrates in environments where code is audited against safety regulations.

> The idea that the defense contractors would drive the industry over-estimates just how much code they write.

This is certainly true now, but was this true when Ada was being designed in the late-70s/early-80s? My understanding is that C didn't become the dominant embedded-systems language until much later. I wasn't there, mind you. I could have some historic details wrong.

Edit: It's worth adding that of the languages the parent poster mentioned above, the only language which still sees mainstream use is C. I know Fortran and LISP have very healthy communities and enjoy a lot of use in niche industries, of course. I don't think this is what the parent poster meant exactly, however it's very common to hear people talk about Ada as a failure on the basis that it didn't completely overtake the software industry. You don't really hear people condemn BASIC, or Pascal in the same way though, even though Ada enjoys much more modern usage.
Information and the Income Gap
isn't it getting hard to get any kind of car worked on in rural areas?

It is. I can do some mechanical work but I have no idea what special tools and tricks are required knowledge with these trucks. At least with side-by-sides there are a myriad of dealers and mechanics near me as so many people use them around their ranches, to go into town and to go into the mountains. There is probably some little shop that would say they could work on the mini-trucks but my experience with the small businesses here as that most of them fake it until they make it, but they never make it. So I would be taking a bit of a gamble. If I found one that was cheap enough it might be worth the gamble as I could just write off the loss if it has some obscure problem. That is why I am still on the fence.
I'm talking about computer vision using the visual landmarks for the fine tuning.
I have to imagine that any closure from the execution is theoretical at best. To sit and watch the life drain from someone, at your behast, with your input, and for your benefit?
Concepts improve the situation with error messages for templates. You get an error message saying the equivalent of "You can't pass this argument to this template function because type X doesn't match concept Y" rather than the esoteric one you get now.
Could this be in anyway related to punctuated equilibrium?
For me, European multipurpose vehicles (sprinter vans?) were a revelation. An old Renault Kangoo is cheap to buy, cheap to drive and cheap to maintain. It's a small, simple car that drives and parks like a small sedan, but carries as much as a small pickup truck.

I can fit a bed, 3 months of luggage and a bicycle in mine. In a pinch, it's a brilliant microcamper. It's a big box on wheels. You can do what you want with it.

It's not a nice car, but it was designed to serve real user needs. That's why they're everywhere from Morocco to Poland.