skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
IP was always taught to me as a negative right. Easiest explained with patents:

In that owning a patent doesn't even give you the right to make the invention described, it only allows you to prevent others from making it.

Especially true if you patent an improvement of someone else's patented invention.

Your patent isn't license to infringe on theirs.

But you can prevent them from using that improvement without having licensed your patent.

Although copyright and trademark are slightly different beasts.
dang - the title should say "distinct integers"
Yeah we just need to keep something trained for the latest APIs

Or at least latest popular x versions of APIs just in case
> For seriously high performance systems like webservers or exchanges, you need to get the architecture right from the start.

Agreed - I worked at a company that went through a very painful period of not coping with load.
They got there in the end by completely rewriting the core system - lots of people claimed the switch from an interpreted language to a compiled language but the reality was that the rewrite was a completely different architecture.
AI Oasis Tribute Album Sparks Debate over Copyright and the Future of Music
Write Apache arrow parquet files directly? A lot of other dbs can ingest those directly anyway.
> Since reading about that, I've wondered if the relying party in FIDO could or should know the difference. Would this entire product line get flagged in some FIDO registry as having exportable keys?

The standard actually anticipates you might want to do that, so the token’s manufacturer can sign the token so that a relying party can whitelist (or, presumably, blacklist) certain tokens.
Is 0^0 equal to 0^0?
This is an interesting observation because when I thought about it, I realized that it has basically been the antidote to social media burnout for me.

Most social media (IG, Twitter etc.) - a find to be a total shitshow and I subscribe to the idea that they cause depression, anxiety and tend to make your life worse.

What can be good though is a small and well moderated community that's focused on a particular interest which everyone in it shares. These can be really rewarding to participate in.

In a somewhat different way, the phenomenon also manifests in the shift from public social media to private online e.g. Telegram chat groups - those don't seem to be as soul-sucking as IG or Twitter, either.
Also unclear why you were downvoted, but so it goes.

With chatGPT 3.5 when I correct inaccuracies in subsequent prompts it responds "I apologize" and updates responses. Switching to 4 in the dropdown menu and repeating the same prompt gives me generally more factually correct responses.

I am mainly testing so not worried about inaccuracies, but kinda funny that I am now paying $20/month to train another company's revenue generator ;)
It's considerably less unpleasant than other methods of sampling.
Endless cheap entertainment for the masses is IMHO one of the best outcomes of AI; it's a field where minor mistakes are tolerable (or even add to the entertainment value), as opposed to using AI for the more critical decisions of society. On the other hand, it may also make real human interaction far more valuable.
I haven’t used TDD much but when I did I found I had that issue, that I would imagine the code I wanted to write and then write tests to check that I had written that code (obviously not the intent of TDD). I got a little better when I thought about testing requirements. I actually used an old trick I’d learned from the head of a web dev shop - when he was struggling to elicit requirements from a client in a meeting, he would hold up a pencil and say “does this fix your problem? why not?” and then inverting their objections would produce requirements more fluidly. (Obviously you don’t stay on the pencil for long, but it puts the client in the right mental state of “looking for lack of capabilities in proposed solution” rather than the more usual “bullet point shopping list of desired delivery levels, SLAs, etc”).
How though (genuine question)?

I can see space filling curves through I^I, but I can't see them covering R^I.

How does a space-filling curve cover a plane without being filled with infinitesimal discontinuities?
Only if you're sure you'll never have to type it when the keyboard layout is set to something different from what you're used to. Good luck remembering where these special chars are...
You actually can do that on Safari:

iOS Settings > Safari > Advanced > Lazy image loading

I’m fairly certain you can do it on Chromium as well, but I don’t remember how.
That example doesn't help you with Galileo's Paradox. In fact it says after the infinitely many new guests arrived, there are now still just "as many" guests as before, even though the new guests are a proper subset of the total guests. The problem is whether you accept this definition of "as many". You could also follow Galileo and say that size comparisons of infinite quantities don't make sense.
Judges are always 'partisan', meaning that they are influenced by some or other ideology, policy choices, theories. As long as a certain segment of population finds their judgments reasonable, that's fine. What is reasonable to one set of people, may not be reasonable to another set of people. The issue is not about truth or falsity, but one of reasonableness.
the stuff you're talking about is what physicists call "low energy" particle physics. There is nothing wrong with that field but it's been around a while and it is not what CERN and other groups are doing.
The sample distance (SSD) is noted on the GIF, and ranges between 6.5 and 4.6 cm for the images shown here.
Ariane 7 is not due for anything. Its just some agencies playing around with ideas. There is no real plan for Ariane 7 and no authorization for anything.

Also, people need to understand that most of the Ariane 6 is just Ariane 5 ME. Lots of parts of the Ariane 6 had been in development long before the Ariane 6.

The new upper stage engine took 20+ years to develop.

It was very hard for ESA to even get funding for Ariane 6, many nations wanted to stick to Ariane 5 ME. It will be a long while until the authorize another 4 billion $ for a new rocket.
Nominated by Ronald Reagan in 1984. We need a higher turnover rate on these jobs.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauline_Newman
Yes. But it wasn’t just about training the pilots, those systems/sensors should have been present even in the cheaper planes (or the cheaper planes simply shouldn’t have been sold).
Where in the USA is this? Guess where photos of 5 random places are on the map
LLM seems more akin to AWS, than a SaaS, companies will create products upon LLMs like how companies rely on AWS to support their products. The build vs buy calculus may tip heavily towards build once they can run on device with good user experience, no need to pay for cloud compute any longer.
I turned off everything, removed, everything that I don't think I would use and Windows 11 is fine for me.
From 2007:

https://www.wired.com/2007/10/inside-the-robo/
ChaosGPT Account Suspended on Twitter
This goes for pretty much every C++ program. I doubt there are any useful programs for which the GNU allocator is optimal.
I really don't want to contemplate the implications for crime or politics when we cannot trust even the most convincing evidence of wrongdoing. Innocent people can be smeared, guilty people can plausibly claim it was faked, and the inevitable result will be a world where truth is so obscured that people just believe whatever aligns with their preconceived notions. Which happens already, but it will get much worse.

And in the meantime, a generation of people who didn't grow up in that world will fall victim to forgeries of a quality they cannot conceive of.
China is still at least 20 years behind on jet turbines. They can get the power or economy (in terms of use time/overhaul), but not both at the same time. Jet turbines are hard to reverse engineer, and you really just have to put the time in on materials engineering.
The term you were looking for appears to be tacit collusion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacit_collusion

Me: What's the official economics term for passive collusion, when players in a market avoid competing with each other without any explicit agreement not to?

GPT-4: The official economics term for passive collusion, when players in a market avoid competing with each other without any explicit agreement not to, is "tacit collusion." Tacit collusion occurs when firms in an industry indirectly coordinate their actions, such as price setting or output levels, without explicit communication or agreements. This behavior can lead to higher prices and reduced competition, similar to the outcomes of explicit collusion or cartels, but it can be harder to detect and regulate.
In a world where you have all the musical masterpieces of history available to you with one tap why would you waste time listening to algorithmically generated mediocrity?
No. Countries of the world have been imaging each others satellites for decades. The only thing that has changed recently is that now companies can do this commercially in an unclassified manner.

https://blog.executivebiz.com/2022/12/noaa-adds-non-earth-im...

https://www.maxar.com/non-earth-imaging
maybe people who had their phrase stored in LastPass?
This is such an strange line of argument. Nobody would ever use such an insane line of argument for anybody other then Musk.

Of course in a company of 10k+ the real work is not done by the CEO. Like this is an absurd standard.

But since when does company leadership not matter anymore? SpaceX has been consistently successful for 25 years and somehow the founder, CEO and chief engineer had nothing to do with it?
Why are you writing that way, so diminishing and belittling? They make that argument very plainly and clearly precisely so you can disagree with it in a clear and concise fashion, but your tact here is to rephrase it with an insulting tone.

You seem to be reading in a lot of negative intent from a person who has given people who disagree with him, 'the skeptics', ample platform and what appears to be eminently fair treatment.

Also this is the specific quote I am referring to, I won't fault you for missing it but it is a very clear invitation.

>If you can think of an alternative theory that fits the timing, international reach, and gendered nature of the epidemic as neatly as the SSM theory, please put it in the comments. Zach and I maintain a Google doc that collects such theories, along with studies that support or contradict each theory. While some of them may well be contributing to the changes in the USA, none so far can explain the relatively synchronous international timing.

I can't really account for the rest of your grievances - they don't sound outlandish but I'm not sure what they have to do with TFA which appears to do a great job of citing sources. Unless you are accusing this person in particular of ripping you off? I don't doubt that you could have sparked usage of that phrase but it is hardly a new idea or phrase even. I read your blog post* and there isn't an intersection between any of the ideas in that and in TFA. The phrase itself seems too nebulous to cite? And now that I check it doesnt appear to be in use in TFA at all? Im having a hard time understanding this actually, is your position that people have been failing to cite you and the evidence is that a phrase you used became more popular?

*that was nice, I hope you aren't taking a lack of 'traction and engagement' as a verdict on quality
Sometimes you just want infinitely variable background noise while you're focusing on something else.
I'm an ML researcher and I'm very interested in doing some self-experimentation with training personalized BCI models. My thought is that if all I am the only person using the models, it doesn't matter if the models overfit on my specific brain—in fact, that would be desirable! One application in particular I've thought a lot about is training a model to embed my brain activity in realtime and then using those embeddings to guide a diffusion model as it's generating an image—basically using the EEG to give the diffusion model live feedback during the denoising process. I know EEG isn't super spatially fine-grained, but I'm suspicious that I might be able to get some nifty results. Sort of like RLHF tuning, but on steroids!
The plane is too big for 2 engines. But the massive engines for 2-engined planes are too big and inefficient for use in a 4 engine configuration. For example, each engine on 2-engine plane must be powerful enough alone for takeoff, whereas in a 4-engine configuration safety regulations only require a minimum of 2 (or 3?) working engines. The former require a much larger performance envelope, even though that increased performance is only required for a brief moment if ever, which is a source of inefficiency. Similarly, maintenance requirements are stricter for the former as they require more frequent safety checks and because they're run harder during takeoff (to reduce the width of the performance profile) they break down more frequently.

This is why a 4-engined plane like the A380 isn't necessarily less economical for having 4 engines instead of 2. Airbus and Emirates have always argued, and arguably Emirates has demonstrated, that all things considered the A380's 4 engine configuration is still cost competitive. However, long-term these factors cannot overcome the aged engine technology. When the A380 debuted, its engines were already half a generation behind the latest, greatest wide body engines, and now they're even further behind. Moreover, IIRC, even older 777 models have received engine upgrades so now the A380's engines are technologically behind aircraft that preceded it.

Airbus and Emirates weren't asking Rolls Royce to deliver anything fancy; just a replacement engine sporting updated blade designs, increased bypass, and other ubiquitous advancements since the mid 1990s; but nothing bleeding edge, like new gearing technology. Rolls Royce agreed, but then decided to pull out because they were "scaling back" (IIRC), not because costs ballooned or any other aspect specific to the project changed.
Satellite View showing Moon's shadow
I am leading a similar initiative and I have also used Databricks for the preprocessing.

Most interesting is what happens between the preprocessing and the model training - the hand-off to the cluster workers.

I guess the efficient option is to partition the data, set up shards in-advance and ideally cache or even copy the data to local workers during init.

This, of course, breaks some of the promise of being able to scale training flexibly, for instance to experiment with the scaling of compute and data.

A different way to go about it is to use a streaming/iterable dataset/loader implementation with its own sharding logic that reads from a central store of parquets with some reasonable row-group size. This gives full flexibility in terms of node/gpu/worker/batch_size for experimentation - e.g. literally as parameters in PyTorch. Of course, one has to also implement caching of remote data since the data is kept centrally.

In my opinion, there is no satisfying/flexible solution for this, especially when one also wants to experiment with complex transformations or augmentations in the dataset/loader and remain portable across cloud offerings. So, this has to be implemented from scratch (not too difficult but still a lot of code). The coming datapipes also probably make this trivial.

Would love to hear more experiences in how you set this up!

Edit:
I guess for NLP this is a good implementation and what Mosaic uses
https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/stream
AI Generated Interview: Joe Rogan Interviews Donald Trump
Trump, Bush, and Clinton were all born in 1946 (ie pure baby boomers). But Clinton was a much younger president than Bush, who was a much younger president than Trump.
She explains in the article that she's a free-to-play player and has not spent any money on it.
I am not a mathematician either, I always maintained the university made a mistake granting make a math teacher degree :) It was also long ago enough a lot of you weren't even alive and I haven't done any such work in a quarter century. Nonetheless...

> but x^y will always be larger than y^x, for y>x and x^y > y^x (prove this by taking the first derivative to get rate of change. Do you use Laplace z domain for discrete, instead of s for continuous?)

I am struggling to follow what are you saying here

>
Why resort to the continuous domain to solve a problem n the discrete, is this even a valid approach?

I can't make heads or tails of this question. The proof says, correctly, for all (real) x != y, x < y solutions it is true that 0<x<e and e<y. He found this by investigating the derivative and establishing the monotonically increasing / decreasing nature of the function. Only after finding this out using does he go back to the original question: what integer x could be? Since he restricted x to be 0 < x < e , we only need to investigate the case of 1 and 2.
Use the slider to start at Thursday, 20 April 2023 12:30 pm AEST and watch the Moon's shadow advance across north-west Australia.
After experiencing frustrating shower situations and facing high gas bills, I was motivated to create the Model Air. This is the first concept of a "Personal Shower" that only requires a source of water and a power plug to function.
very interesting intersection there, the unrepeatable song, like AI riffing never to be heard again. Pulling the digital into the realm of the ephemeral, almost like a live performance. What a combination of thoughts married up there.
Personally, I am terrified. I am doing GRC (Governance, Risk Management, Compliance) for a Marketing and PR Firm that is really just a digital marketing firm-- and we have already been told from industry insiders we can't bill over 70 dollars an hour for writers and expect to get the contract. I think AI has a very strong possibility of completely wrecking this industry and will allow either major marketing firms or extremely small 2 man shops to fracture the market driving out the mid-size and small firms.

So great time to throw this out there- I love GRC, have experience in SOC2, Iso27001 and NIST 800-171, and I am always looking for my next position. I also helped set up our Cost Accounting system and can perform both project management and implementation of system integrations. Contact me through HN.
BlueOrigin is spending 1-2 billion a year easly on New Glenn. That is probably as much or more then SpaceX spends on Starship. And there is really no question what the better program.

> Or his choices turned out to be better out of poor luck. Survivorship bias.

If you start out with 1000 and 1 is successful claiming survivor bias might be valid, if its a tiny number of companies this explanation doesn't really work. Specially in a field where before SpaceX most starups just outright failed with no survivors at all.
So what is to be done about it? Do we just let it continue as is and slowly erode society, do we just continue with further technological advancement blindly no matter what the social or economic costs?

I get this sounds hyperbolic but I really don’t see how the internet can continue like this. Like personally, if I was an artist, writer or musician I’d be never releasing any works online ever again. Sure people can get around that but like, I’d be making it harder to steal my stuff.

This is probably the moment when the internet is no longer “cool” and just starts to get weird.

I’m already becoming much much much more suspicious of the internet and even starting to question online forming participation, I have no idea if the comments section is real people or generated content made to influence people. It’s really turning me off cyberspace.
Colorado to require mediation before eviction for tenants on government aid
I made the mistake of opening this on my phone. It is technically playable in that tapping the screen causes the sprite to fire and teleport around the screen. It is not feasibly playable this way, though, because movement range seems limited to the bottom half of the left third of the screen only. Still enjoyed the music & graphics, though!
Creative ability isn't an "ability" so much as a modality people who are creative are stuck in. Creative people have an itch to make something. I think I am a creative person and I don't quite even think it has anything to do with the quality of your work when determining whether you are creative or not. I say that because between people, if we want to draw a distinction which would motivate the definition of a creative person vs. someone who isn't, the range of creative impulse is so striking in how binary it is. It seems to me you basically feel the need to do it or you don't.

Creativity is the persistent and powerful impulse to do something for the sake of doing it, not necessarily for money or attention, simply for the satisfaction of knowing once this didn't exist and now it does. That's all. Some people are intelligent, lucky, and hard working and may be they are Cervantes, Shakespeare, Beethoven, types, but that has to do with, I'd argue something separate from mere creativity...
Is this just a high level description of the process? There isn’t really any actual code to run or tutorial to follow.
Half the comments here are "I wish the world hadn't moved beyond GTK2". I don't see the problem myself (GTK3 isn't libadwaita and some of the GTK2 controls like the file picker belong in a museum) but there's clearly a vocal group of people out there who will use GTK2/Gimp 2 for as long as they possibly can. It also saves a lot of problems with stable distributions (Debian, Ubuntu, etc.) because they can't just upgrade dependencies willy-nilly, and nobody wants a custom Debian patched GIMP to port back features from the next minor release. Taking the time to do a rewrite can help to prevent a half-broken intermediate state with wrapper objects and facades everywhere to deal with the version difference.
Your favorite song loses its ability to trigger your dopamine when you listen to it 100 times in a row. Being able to generate unlimited music in the style of your favorite song sounds amazing.
Moving buildings, not just rotating them, is not that unusual.

In fact, there's a building I know of that was moved, people changed their mind soon after, and then they moved it again.

Once it was a mansion that reportedly belonged to Leland Stanford (you west coasters might have heard of him), later a nursing home, and finally a bank. It was in the way of a Wal-Mart and other development.

This page says that one of the moves was 350 feet:

https://www.wolfehousebuildingmovers.com/news/moving-ingerso...

A rail depot in Ohio was moved 1000 feet:

https://www.wolfehousebuildingmovers.com/news/wolfe-moves-cs...

A gas station is claimed to have been relocated 1.5 miles in three hours:

https://www.wolfehousebuildingmovers.com/news/historic-phila...

(This is not an endorsement of the company and I'm not affiliated with them; I just found their page by looking for the mansion)
I agree, the definition is too vague, in theory it must include Tesla auto pilot deaths as they are using a neuronal networks and machine learning.
Who are "we"? Where's the young citizen who had a say on who should be judge? Where's the young citizen who voted for the Federal Reserve chairman or the ECB president?
For Salons, "conversational doorknobs"?
https://www.experimental-history.com/p/good-conversations-ha...
What exactly is Russian going to do in retaliation? They've already failed to invade an ex-Soviet neighbor. At this point if I were Russian I'd be concerned Finland might just annex the whole country and nothing could be done to stop them.