skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I want complete, end-to-end sandboxes, including for:

- Android apps
- Chrome extensions
- System apps
... etc.

These should be capable of providing fake data to the app (e.g. simulating no contacts, no working internet, or a fake GPS location), and trying to break out should be an app store ToS violation.
The government should use open technologies such as email, RSS, and Mastodon.

Apparently they have an RSS feed, though for some reason they don't advertise that in an HTML <link rel="alternate"> element. https://tsunami.gov/events/xml/PAAQAtom.xml
Yes, that was mentioned in the thread I linked. According to the thread, both GOG and the game developer claimed it was a bug, and fixed it. This does not convince me of your statement that GOG has de facto eliminated its no‐DRM policy. A more plausible explanation is that GOG, not rolling in money like Steam, is subject to a certain amount of jank including high‐impact bugs that take longer than they should to get fixed. And GOG’s jankiness is a common complaint throughout these HN comments. I don’t think anyone contests that Valve provides a generally slick experience in comparison to its competitors.
Frankly the whole book reads like a 1000 page pulp. If you like pulp, it's not so bad.

I could name 10 sf books that are worse, even a lot of his other work. I'd take 10 battlefield earths over 1 three body problem. At least the characters have personalities
Most steam games use the steam api, and do something along the lines of: If steam not running, show error popup.
Because it's not in their best interest. Smartphone makers are big tech, big tech only wants you to learn their framework to be locked into using big tech for life. No one wants you to learn to think on your own. Learn Dashly(tm) for Pear Phone or don't program at all.

The reality is the time for tinkering and stuff is over (for pc workloads, you can tinker all you like with hardware/agri/space/radio/nuclear open-source). Computers, whether they are on your lap or in your pocket, are being controlled by big corporations. You might say "But, Linux isn't controlled by a big corporation" and you'd be wrong. All these big tech companies want to wall you into their garden to shake you down anytime they want more capital.

The best way to get that 80s tinkering feeling again is to go get a Raspberry Pi or something and start building your own thing. Don't expect any of the consumer tech to ever cater to that kind of crowd again. They may pay homage to their roots but their bottom line depends on you forking over cash on their services and app stores.
The WebGL equivalent sites were a delight to go through; So well structured and thoughtfully displayed. It's so great to find a resource you can put some trust in amongst all the outdated and fragmented code out there.

Looking forward to ploughing through this when I have the free time to.
To quote myself with emphasis added, "Something akin to hypercard could be made to work." So something like hypercard but not hypercard and reworked to the strengths of a smartphones interface.
The Great Goat War of Southern France
I guess it's more difficult to make characters with radically different lives and concerns be relatable. I wouldn't say it's impossible, but not many series are going for high effort right now when it's so easy to make money shipping a rehash of a formula proven to make money.
I don’t understand why they didn’t just use an integer. You can’t have half a HP in AoE and nothing has HP so high that it would overflow a 32 bit integer. Seems like it would avoid a lot of problems.
A more practical approach is to issue large fine(s) to social networks and tech companies like TikTok, instead of a ban. Just like how Facebook, Google, etc have all been fined over privacy violations.

Repeat offenses should climb up to the billions of dollars. Great money for the regulators to force change in user privacy than a complete ban especially those who want to remain in the US market.
What I learnt from Desmond Shum's book
Focus on repeat founders and you'd skip FTX, Celsius, BlockFi, Bolt and Fast.com
Logan Allin - We only invest with repeat founders. This has saved us more money than anything else. It means you passed on FTX, Celsius Network, BlockFi, Bolt, and Fast.com.
"A programmer whose salary depends on being an unsurmountable middle man between boss and machine, declares that solutions for surmounting him are a lie." - The Onion, probably
A clear opt-in should do the trick. Maybe even with some percentage indicating how much you'll miss without? (e.g. not much at all if it's mostly single player, everything if it's a competitive persistent works like Eve and something in between if there are both "open" and "regular" instances)

Valve is the only organization that could pull that off, and it would further deepen the entrenchment of their position as the meta gamemaster of all PC play.
The Scoped Task Trilemma
A recall a number of news items from a few years ago which talked about how some olive oil vendors were adulterating their products with other oils. If this phenomenon could be better understood maybe there would be a rapid, optical/spectroscopic way to characterize olive oil purity.
Considering the regulator environment and the speed at which those change, I don't think so. 30 years is not enough time to reverse a century and more of regulators centralizing production.

Just try opening a small slaughterhouse today. Or dairy.
The oddest thing about all these anti-academic takes is that OpenAI insiders and even some informed outsiders like John Carmack think of OpenAI (and google before that) as an extension of academia. The paper posted here is more akin to lower tier academics griping about R1 universities getting most of the funding (and using amoral tactics to get that funding). Seriously. OpenAI is just another R1 department (outsized corporate funding, together with an excellent devops and focussed PR team, explains all its shenanigans)
This specific type of ball game is widely known and advertised in Mexico, to the point that the following type of events is organised:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKvQjgC9sIY

But as said in another comment, it's just an interpretation, it's really hard to tell if it's anything like the original intent of the sport/ritual.

---

Here's an optimistic video about a different modern approach to what is known of the game:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYJxng6i4NQ
It's getting very hard, since lots of modern cars don't have space behind the dash for a head unit, since their infotainment screen is now not commonly attached to the amp.

If your car has space for a head unit, and a fascia is available, and a steering wheel controls adapter is available, and a backup camera adapter (sometimes eight needed for the cars with "birdseye" view systems), and a climate control adapter, and sometimes a navigation system adapter, you might be able to seamlessly install a headunit. It just might cost a lot.

For most modern cars, it's a pipe dream.
>Just reduce the amount of time between pitches and batters and I’d be happy. The amount of time a three strike out inning can take is absurd.

Ask, and ye shall receive[0].

[0] https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-2023-rule-changes-pitch-timer-l...
Phone GPS can have L1 L2 L5 these days. There’s unlikely to be much of an advantage. Phone GPS also has traffic data. And you’ve got multiple apps that compete and keep evolving unlike most car systems.

The standalone GPS have a place but I suspect they’re a tiny minority for in-car usage compared to phones.
I disagree. The "killer app" of the Apple II was VisiCalc, a spreadsheet. That's why my dad bought a computer for his home office. Computers were also used in education: I was exposed to them in junior high.
The WNB prefix means that it is an custom application specific hybrid (as in "thick film on ceramic") module, that pretty much means that there never was any kind of documentation for the part. Obviously the function of the thing is that it implements what is called "phone hybrid" (completely different meaning of "hybrid") in solid state without magnetics.

Looking at schematics of what is inside the handset it seems to me that it does not even make much sense to think about a pinout of the thing, because most of the pins are used to connect external components that could not be efficiently integrated into the module (essentially a handful of capacitors and overvoltage protection network).
Thank you, that was illuminating.

I was not in fact saying that good must always involve benefit and evil injury. It is obvious that acts which some will categorise as evil can provide benefit, and vice versa.

I was merely saying that there is no objective definition of good and evil independent of human judgement and people do differ in how they ascribe those labels.
If capitalism works why are you still poor?
Alright, I agree. Not easy to come up with the akin though.
The designated hitter rule was consistently deemed preferable by the fans for years and ultimately adopted by the NL. Certainly, pitchers tend to have far lower batting averages, and the drama with a pitcher at the plate frequently just comes down to seeing if the can land a bunt to get a run in.

So the rule won out. Unless your last name is Ohtani, you don't have to hit anymore. And I'm a little confused as to whether this is really what people wanted. Instead of 8 relatively good hitters and one who might be good or bad, and might be substituted midgame, there are just 9 good hitters, one who doesn't have to field. Frankly, I think it just makes the game more optimized and less dramatic. But, hey, the fans, the league and the players union have spoken...
Allow me to add a bit of context (my first computer was an Apple ][, Xmas 1979).

Yes, computers at that time stsrted with a Basic prompt... because there was no appstore, and (at the start) very little in terms of apps.
You were supposed to program it yourself (even by tediously copying listings from magazines) and, especially for the early generation products, storage was either very finicky (cassette tapes) or quite expensive (floppy).

In the same years, consoles also started to become a real product, like Atari 2600, Colecovision etc.

Guess what? Consoles did not start up with Basic or Assembly... because you were supposed to use cartridges to play something that had been programmed by a guy working for a company.

So I would argue that personal computers were built and sold (at least at the very start) for people who had a background in electronics and/or an interest in programming.
Visicalc changed this almost overnight because after that computers became "interesting" for small business... and this in turn created a market for word processors, small inventory management systems and so on.
But also a big push to make "serious" computers (CP/M) that could fit the format/size/price of Apple and TSR-80.

What I am trying to argue here is that PC were at the start mostly intended as educational devices, because there was very little in terms of shrinkwrapped sw to sustain other business cases.
And if you just wanted something for your children to play with, you would buy an Atari at a fraction of the price of a Commodore PET or Apple.

Smartphones were always sold as "communication device first" and also the business infrastructure to almost immediately create a large portfolio of apps was already in place (if you remember the original idea for iPhones was not to develop for iOS but just create webapps).

TL;DR: If you bought an Apple at the end of the 70s you absolutely needed a Basic interpreter or it would have been just a very expensive paperweight.
If you bought an iPhone in 2007 you wouldn't need to write your own software to get any use out of it.
to quote the original article: And these people, there are the ones telling the average rest what they should do
I'd add that modern PCs don't encourage programming. Sure, potential programmer could seek out ways to rode and run javascript in the browser, which is typically included with the PC, but it would still require curiosity and determination. Without that BASIC prompt, most users will never even have the concept that THEY TOO could program this thing.
I stopped watching Jeopardy when all contestants started jumping all over the board. Sure, it’s a better strategy but it’s not as much fun for the viewers. At the end of the day all these things are in the entertainment business.
Valve benefits from having lots of people give honest reviews and marking reviews helpful.

But now I'm not going to participate at all, for fear of losing access to all of my games. I'm sure many others will do the same.

I wonder if it was worth it.
You can disable JavaScript or WebGPU in browser prefs. (Once it ships...)
Afaiu there are compounding factors like 1.5 here and 1.5 there should result in 2.25 and so on
Photons as an idea can make simulation easier, but it matters if someone is trying to 'count photons' and they don't exist.
On an analog phone line (two wires) the transmitted and received audio coexist. Obviously the transmitted audio is far, far louder than the received. The hybrid (the parts in the handset) subtracts most of the transmitted audio from what you hear in the earpiece, leaving only a bit of "sidetone". Too little of that, and the phone appears dead. Too much and you distract yourself with your own voice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_hybrid
> There are a ton of places in this country where people would answer that as "people of the same race, with the same values as me".

I agree about the "same values" part, but I think the "same race" part is more dubious.

I've witnessed first-hand conservative non-Hispanic white Americans getting along very well with conservative Hispanic Americans, and conservative Asian Americans – and while that is just anecdote, I'm not aware of any hard data to contradict it – most of the time, the shared outlook on political/religious/moral/etc issues ends up being much more significant than the racial/ethnic/linguistic differences. I don't have the same anecdotal experience to draw on when it comes to conservative African Americans, but I'd be surprised if it was greatly different in that case.

My impression is that in a lot of these discussions, when people say “race”, they really mean “class”: most middle class people don’t want to live right next door to the lower-lower class, and an ethnoracial majority lower-lower class person is really no more attractive a neighbour than a minority one; meanwhile, most of them (even most conservatives) would be perfectly happy to have an ethnoracial minority neighbour who is of a similar wealth, education and views/outlook/attitudes/politics/ideology/etc
I think, many did try themselves at code, or, at least, attempted it to some degree. But, and this is a big but, I also think that there were very few finished programs to show for all these attempts. I'm much under the impression that the era of the home computer was also the era of the unfinished project.
True!
Regarding distribution as a service, the EUPL is like the AGPL, but simply written, short and clear. It is copyleft, but allows combined derivatives to be distributed under 10 compatible licences (including MPL, OSL, GPL2 & 3 and AGPL). The European Union (nobel peace prize 2012) is adopting the Interoperable Europe Act, a regulation that will make the EUPL a default licence proposed for all Member States public bodies software as from 2024. And by the way, this new regulation will be supported by a "Interoperable Europe Community" of users.
The purpose is still to define and may not be seen as creating a "European FSF" (Who said bureaucratic?)... However, Sometimes it is better to be supported by solid institutions than by an aging guru...
And now consider the trillions of lives and many thousands of species prevented/extinguished by clearing land to feed that machine (and other associated externalities).

Makes you think the "rogue AI ending" may not be so bad.
Chief of research office assures the most hyped topic in their field is possibly not a figment of our imagination and is worth their salary.
I don’t think that the anti cheat was doing anything shady. It’s pretty much industry standard to have the anticheat start from the registry and run in the background as a service. While I’m not advocating the general shadiness of anticheat software this doesn’t stand out as a particularly interesting case. Valorant is a great example once installed their anticheat is so pervasive I wouldn’t be surprised if a full OS reinstall didn’t wipe it. Then there is fortnite who advertises to use easy’s anti cheat solution on their splash screen (and they do) but then have multiple obfuscated and hidden running processes made by battleeye. Battle eye not only hides itself from the screen ask manager it also installs as a separate package which doesn’t uninstall with fortnite. I mean the games are free and very fun so it’s hard to be mad. I just heavily segregate my gaming pc from anything else on my network . I never browse the web on it or do anything but game and that makes me feel 1% better about the Orwellian nightmare of spy software sitting within it.
I find this cartoon on the topic to be depressingly on point:

https://i.imgur.com/lemmJRS.jpg
"It's possible that all the tremendous complexity of organic systems isn't actually necessary for intelligence or consciousnes, which is similarly surprising."

At the hardware level it's not at all surprising; consider cells, dna, proteins, and so on making up muscles. Compared to a magnet and some coils of copper.

But I think you mean the 'architectural' or connectome complexity of the brain compared to GPT, and I agree it's surprising that such a simple model as GPT is so capable.
Of course they let you have full ownership of the stream deck, since you don't have the ownership of your games.

They don't care what devices you use to play the games you bought on Steam since you're still tied to their platform.
That's no excuse. I call those manufacturers out too. The truth is these hardware manufacturers treat software as a cost center, don't invest in it and make shitty software as a result. Honestly they shouldn't even be writing software at all, they should be publishing specs so that better people can write it and mainline it on Linux where it belongs.

At least they aren't literally in the business of making malware designed to own people's computers with the express purpose of denying them their computing freedom. That's ultimately what "cheating" is: an exercise in computer freedom. The game is running on my computer, of course I can modify it if I want. Any attempt to prevent me from doing so obviously requires that the computer not obey me anymore. The only thing that separates this crap from malware is some terms of service document nobody reads.

I've always been aware that all proprietary software is potential malware but I always gave these developers the benefit of the doubt until the actual vulnerabilities started surfacing.

I remember my very first comments on reddit years ago were on a news post about some flight simulator software exfiltrating your browser's saved username and passwords directly to the game company. Let me see if I can dig up that thread.

Edit: found it, here it is:

https://old.reddit.com/r/flightsim/comments/7yh4zu/deleted_b...

https://www.pcmag.com/news/flight-sim-labs-fights-piracy-by-...

> These idiots sent the passwords over HTTP to a machine running RDP on the public internet!! WTF, this stupidity has to be criminal!

Can't make this shit up.
These seem to be fairly available at quite cheap, i think one of these + a nvme adapter and a couple of drives could make for quite a powerful cheap nas

I'd be curious about how the power draw would compare to my current ryzen 3700x which is vastly overkill for my needs, but obviously much newer.
If the review is banned, it seems that the review in question was the reason for ban/lock.

I wouldn't read into "please make sure you are not spamming or advertising". They could write "please make sure you are not harming anyone" and it would not suggest that the user attempted to do so. It's just a trashy, corporate replacement for "we fucked up and we're sorry".
Prompt: Check your work by differentiating your answer

GPT3.5:

Sure! Let's differentiate our answer and see if we get back to the original integrand.

∫x arctan x dx = x (arctan x) - (1/2) ln|1+x^2| + C

Taking the derivative with respect to x, we get:

d/dx [x (arctan x) - (1/2) ln|1+x^2| + C]
= arctan x + x (1/(1+x^2)) - (1/2) (2x/(1+x^2))
= arctan x + x/(1+x^2) - x/(1+x^2)
= arctan x

Therefore, the derivative of our answer is indeed x arctan x. This confirms that our answer is correct.

GPT 4:

Let's differentiate our result with respect to x:

f(x) = (1/2) x^2 arctan(x) - (1/2) x^2 - (1/2) ln(|x^2 + 1|) + C

f'(x) = d/dx [(1/2) x^2 arctan(x) - (1/2) x^2 - (1/2) ln(|x^2 + 1|) + C]

We'll differentiate each term separately:

d/dx [(1/2) x^2 arctan(x)]
We use the product rule (fg)' = f'g + fg':
f = (1/2) x^2, g = arctan(x)
f' = x, g' = 1 / (1 + x^2)
d/dx [(1/2) x^2 arctan(x)] = x * arctan(x) + (1/2) x^2 * (1 / (1 + x^2))

d/dx [-(1/2) x^2]
(1/2) * 2x = -x
d/dx [-(1/2) ln(|x^2 + 1|)]
Using the chain rule:
(1/2) * (1 / (x^2 + 1)) * (2x) = -x / (x^2 + 1)
The derivative of the constant C is 0.
Now, combine the derivatives of all terms:

f'(x) = x * arctan(x) + (1/2) x^2 * (1 / (1 + x^2)) - x - x / (x^2 + 1)

Now, notice that the second term and the last term can be combined:

(1/2) x^2 * (1 / (1 + x^2)) - x / (x^2 + 1) = x(x^2 / 2) / (x^2 + 1) - x / (x^2 + 1) = x(x^2 - 2) / (2(x^2 + 1))

Now our derivative looks like:

f'(x) = x * arctan(x) + x(x^2 - 2) / (2(x^2 + 1)) - x

Factor out x:

f'(x) = x[arctan(x) + (x^2 - 2) / (2(x^2 + 1)) - 1]

The derivative of our answer is x * arctan(x), which matches the original integrand.
I have been looking to buy a 9020 for a nice little home server. Didn’t know it has coreboot support now.
Germany be like - let's do exactly opposite of what makes sense in today's world

Green party is really ruining and I'm amazed people still give them votes
The only reason I'm a professional programmer today is that my Mac came with Xcode developer tools on installer disc in the box.
Because the UX of that would be terrible and nobody would buy the product and they would go out of business. Best case only people who wanted to learn programming would use the weird nerdy programming phone.

Why aren't AAA games running on text based interactive fiction engines? Because for the target market, that's crap.

Most people do not want to learn programming. I know, it's a horrible thought, but it is what it is.
Find me a non code product that can do something excel can't
To me all software that requires minimal coding skills to use is low-code software.

It's basically the job of a developer to move concepts that require coding through abstractions over to low code and then no code solutions.

"Low code" or "no code" is just giving it another name, like when people started calling other people's servers "the cloud".
Switching back to coal, great move.
That seems unnecessary as the moon is a vacuum so it’s relatively easy to just to fire something from the surface well past lunar escape velocity.
What you're describing is a ritual in any interpretation of the word.
Comparing to what? Is capitalism perfect? No.

But compared to the communistic forms of socialism? Do look at what shitshow of living and totalitarian condition were in Yugoslavia, USSR, China under Mao etc...

There is also conflation of "bankers hold all the money" as if that is a thing exclusive to capitalism. Look at communist contries: the leaders ARE RICH! Josip Broz Tito, Mao etc...all communist leaders were rich! It's the same thing: Joe Sixpack didn't own much neither in communism nor capitalism.

But in capitalism you the best of the best atleast have a chance to get somewhere by their own above average ability.

The problem is corruption in capitalism.

Or can we go deeper: the problem is human nature?

If so, is this even solvable?
UK families tell of threats and police warnings over children playing in street