skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s okay graphic design. He even goes on to say it’s not a photograph.

Well, that's the bit that I think is most odd here. It's not a photograph.

Whether if AI-generated images are fair game in art competitions in general, I guess that's up to the folks running the competitions, but I would think an AI-generated image would pretty clearly not be a valid entry for a photography contest. No more than a painting or a charcoal drawing.
The problem is using too many of these high energy devices at the same time you are charging the vehicle. We need smart meters which can turn off vehicle charging or hot water heating while the dryer or kitchen stove/oven are in use.
You could do live-action animated Teen Girl Squad with this ...
Excuse me, but what kind of "changes" are you talking about?

Professionalism is primarily built on trust, including a mutual trust in professional systems. Therefore, students are not allowed to cheat on exams, for example (not only for this reason, of course, but also for this reason).

If you think that the destruction of the system of mutual trust is some kind of "change", then I want to upset you, because such "changes" do not require software systems on the scale of modern "AI" at all.

By this act nothing but destroying the mutual trust was done. Now the organizers of professional photography competitions will not trust photographers, and photographers will not trust the organizers of competitions.
I don't think its a stretch to classify anyone associated with the manufacturer of real world hysteria (DOS like this or Ransomware collectives) as a Terrorist subject to the same toolbox for removal. AI Deepfakes are going to make threats like this serious and so should be the response.
But a current-gen bot doesn't go look around for forums to leave comments on by itself. There must be a human that set that up through the API.

My question is why, what's the point? If it even happens, in this case it was not so.
Right, logging things is definitely a good idea.

Whether these tools are secure or not depends entirely on how you are using them. If you don't understand prompt injection you're very likely to build a system that's vulnerable to it.
It's cool that this is possible, but it's missing some very important subtleties which make professional animation look "right" or even "real". As it is, there's no sense of compression or snap at the right parts of the movement. 2D character animation has a lot of exaggerated distortions of objects to make them look like they land on the ground or bounce. The sense of weight and inertia is critical.

These aren't necessarily great, but this page[0] does touch on some of the basic concepts. "Squash and stretch" is a key thing missing. Also while in the demo you're dancing not walking, a walk cycle is a very basic thing which is often done poorly by even supposedly professional companies. [1] It's really important for the "contact" part to seem like it's happening. Getting feet to plant themselves on the ground and look like they're not swimming or sliding around is a challenge.

[0] https://idearocketanimation.com/13721-12-principles-of-anima...
[1] https://www.angryanimator.com/word/2010/11/26/tutorial-2-wal...

[my father worked in animation for much of his career and would complain bitterly about badly done animation, so I guess I can't unsee things with his critical eye]
Are Affirmations Voodoo or Is There Science?
> since your weight in carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen will exceed many times your weight in gold

Your weight is the same in any element, maybe you meant your worth?
Yes, but Australia is " the land mass that makes up the entirety of the mainland" of Oceania.
Reading ordinary news, does not help either.
Even though as you say atm. Apple does not support <=10.15. Latest Xcode 14.3 still supports building applications that target macOS 10.13.[1]

So that is not an excuse to drop support for 10.15.

[1] https://developer.apple.com/support/xcode/
I find it wildly ridiculous that we've more or less abandoned the practically simple idea of "the web is text, so just let people render the text how they want in their browsers."

Yet another reminder of the overblown nature of UX/UI in general. Given the current push for accessibility, seems like "make the text accessible" should be the goal above all else.
No, it's just accurate. A personal or business problem between two people is not political. What happened is a lot of people wanted this issue to be political, but they turned out to be wrong.
What I usually do is to select a parent HTML element of the list of third parties using the browser's dev console and then use JS to find, loop, and click each of those toggles automatically in one go. The script would look something like this:

$0.querySelectorAll('.thirdparty button.optoutToggle').forEach(({click}) => click())

Where $0 is an automatic reference to the selected parent element. The pseudocode/example string passed to querySelectorAll should be a selector (same syntax as selectors in CSS) to get each individual toggle element. Then forEach of those toggles it simulates a mouse click event.

That said, whatever is on these websites isn't usually even worth all this effort and it doesn't always work.
economically, this doesn't work. The cheaper cars will always be those that roll all functions into a single cost center. This is why cars wind up with a horribly awful touch screen in the center for controlling almost everything about the car's function.
I did see that, but forgot to mention it above. You’re right that’s important info too.
Difference between "pushy" and "inspiring" is the way the action is perceived. I don't think we can evaluate that from the post alone.

A lot of parents "push" their kids into something, and have them accept it enthusiastically.
Empathy: I feel what you feel/understand where you're coming from

Sympathy: I like you/I feel for you/It hurts me when you're hurt

Compassion: I feel bad/want to help when you feel bad

There's some overlap, and each is often needed to get the others
It isn't great.

I argued "the sun is hot" - lots of ways to argue against this, but it got stuck on basically repeating "that might not be the case" followed by statements that are ridiculous on context e.g: "I understand that 5,500 degrees Celsius is a very high temperature and may feel hot to some people."

Also, the response to:

"even the coolest parts of the sun are hot."

was:

"it does not take into account the fact that the sun has a range of temperatures depending on which layer you're measuring."

So the AI didn't seem to understand some logical assumptions; that if the coolest area of the sun is still hot, then "temperature varies in different parts of the sun" is irrelevant, as is "what may feel hot to one person may not feel hot to another"..
Bleeding heart people are always like this. They want to help...but from very very far away.
Mins on Public Transport ≈ 10√X KM
In llama.cpp you can use a flag on ./main to set a custom context size, that can be up to 2048.
An island is not an expanse of land, and the presence of a river doesn't make an expanse of land discontinuous.
Not familiar with Just, but seems its designed as a minimal wrapper over v8. The benchmark code is probably jumping directly from JS to native code... most of the github repo is C++

Edit:
There's actually an article that explains how Just ranks so highly
https://just.billywhizz.io/blog/on-javascript-performance-01...
This is a very bad take. From an OSS perspective languages can attract large communities of contributors and corporate sponsors because of their broad appeal and utility. Specialized libraries will have more trouble doing both and may need alternate models to sustain themselves. From a business perspective, Mike offers not only a free version but the paid enterprise version comes with support from Mike and his team, which is something you can't get from a language owner unless you outright hire them or they run a consultancy.
AMD Details OpenSIL for Advancing Open-Source System Firmware
The underlying papers come from 2016, 1974 and 1972.

Here's a link to the 1974 one, with comments from a reviewer of the paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1311998/?page=1
But if each image is random, what does an image being "better" one day actually tell you about the underlying model?

That's why I suggested generating 16 models each time instead of just 1 a- if all 16 are noticeably better than the previous day you've learned something a lot more interesting than if just one appears to be better than the previous one.
They'll find out it's really not, when they inevitably meet a foolish highly-intelligent person doing unwise things...
> only because they contributed some magical ingredient from their souls

The fact that you turned a limitation of an specific algorithm into a call for magical powers shows quite a bit of bias on your part.
Oban is a roughly equivalent elixir library. They claim to have hundreds of customers and their cheapest plan is $500/yr, so maybe they make an order of magnitude less? Considering the relative language popularity that seems pretty good.
Teaching a Chat to write poetry with some stunning results
I hadn't heard of tldr. Looks neat! Here's a link for other people who didn't know: https://github.com/tldr-pages/tldr
Can you write about the reasons for much faster builds, as far as you know?

Is it mainly due to the zig's caching of the build artifacts?
China agreed to arm Russia, leaked Pentagon documents reveal
I've been asking myself, why waste time setting up a NAS when there are cloud based alternatives for storing data. Then, news like this comes along and reminds me why.
You don't go to MIT for the education. There is absolutely nothing you will learn at MIT that you can't learn on your own or at any other college.

You go to MIT because MIT is a social filter that gives you access to world class opportunities that are almost impossible to get otherwise. Anyone who has an opportunity to go to MIT should do whatever they can to try to get in.
So much of this depends on your kid.

What worked for us (8 year old boy) has been Lego, Turing Tumble, Gravitrax, Lego and Lego.

RE what's age-appropriate, Turing Tumble he got when he was 6, and it worked fine for him. Legos have been a thing since he was a toddler.

Minecraft is also something that our son enjoys, and I don't feel too terrible about him playing online w/ friends, as it is pretty creative, but I do worry about excessive time on screens.
How is Apple suppose to change Firefox and Chrome’s source code?

If either browser’s manufacturer wants to see what Apple does to make Safari more battery efficient, they are free to look at the source code to WebKit.
AI inception, by planting carefully crafted messages across the 'net might become a thing! ... it already isn't.
It does seem like there is a constituency that wants to make this political, facts be damned. Calling that out will probably invite them to continue down their chosen path as you say, but it's still worth pointing out false narratives, even if the response is kind of annoying.
Actually, a site that is structured well enough to be usable in text mode browsers is already more accessible to all users than most of the “beautifully” designed examples.

There's a different kind of incapacity involved: incapacity to control your device and software to have them suit your needs. The reply assumes that user has no other option except to drool and stare at what website author chose.
> I always thought that that was my government's plan

It was when NK wasn't a nuclear threat. Plans change fundamentally when that attribute changes. If Russia wasn't armed with nukes, it wouldn't have invaded Ukraine, because it would lose every conventional war against Western forces that might help Ukraine. But due to nuclear weapons, Russia knows it has nothing to fear and can act in any way it likes. If Ukraine had been armed with nukes, Russia wouldn't have invaded either, because it would've eventually meant certain destruction for Russia (and the world, but they don't care about the world).
Try adding some 320x50, 300x250 ad inventory! It can be very profitable.
I have a bunch of my kids drawings that I want to turn into digital art paintings. Is there any product or service for this?
Certainly a peculiar relationship. Your post made me wonder when the first dogecoin private key will reach escape velocity. Any bets? I think we can agree that the "if" and "who" is already settled...
I am saying there are many, many behaviors which human beings have which the rest of the animal kingdom does not exhibit.

I am positing that, in fact, most of how we spend our time as human beings (such as arguing on YC news threads) is behavior which does not exist in the rest of the animal kingdom.

That is not an argument about scale as you say, it is an argument about the type of behavior.
the noise it makes when going to "ready" makes you realize why things had an 'online/ready' state

buy one today! https://printronixplus.com lol
much better expressed than me :D
Good reply. Thank you!
MS was making a lot if profit too when it tanked several products trying to catchup with market leaders. Google has been a leader but it isn't just openai that has it playing catchup that just happens to affect it's core business.
I consider donation what random user give me on patreon/gh sponsor/itch.io

I talked with the makers or manufacturer and we reached an agreement.
So to me (and them) it's royalties.
My friend and I built https://apitude.co/ around 4 years ago as a side project. It consists of a group of REST APIs like this: https://apitude.co/en/docs/services/renapo-mx/

The site did:
- $200 a month the first year.
- $900 a month the second year.
- $2K a month the third year.
- $5K a month the third year. (We started working full time).
- $9K a month this year.

Even when it was only a side project it demanded a lot of work, but we love the space so it was ok.
Oh damn that's something unexpected that I'll love!

Flameshot is so nice!
It doesn't really gravitate to the poles, it's just that once water reaches a permanently shadowed bit of a crater, it stays there forever.
Twitter increases character limit to 10k for paying customers
Empathy deals with the emotional systems (I feel you).
Sympathy deals with intellectual (I understand what you feel or imagine it must feel like x).
Compassion is a transcendent experience in which you try to imagine yourself in the shoes of another.
It might have something to do with NK’s erratic and aggressive leadership.
I love how culty the Rust sphere is. I don't have many opportunities to use it but I always stop to watch tutorials/read articles because of how enthusiastic people are about the language
A feedback loop where AI trains on second order regurgitation of what it has outputted almost necessitated that this happens (and oscillates).
The Crackdown Cometh
Lets change the framing. Assuming this is bad for humanity and assuming someone will do this -- because it's unavoidable, right? -- what would the best way to introduce this to mankind be?

I imagine introducing a perfect "Her" with no flaws in personality, implementation, hosting (local hosting on cheap hardware, etc) would be the worst version. Humanity hasn't had time to adjust. Laws not written, social understanding of it not achieved, etc. It's a bomb, in it's most perfect form, unleashed. In this framing, waiting the longest possible time before it is unleashed seems the worst way to introduce humanity.

Alternatively, introducing it early gives humanity a far less tempting version of it. Both the implementation and personality are full of holes, flaws. We at least have a chance to understand it at a time when it is at it's weakest. When it's the least effective it can be at achieving whatever disastrous outcomes that are expected.

I don't agree with this in general. BUT, i'm framing that if we assume it's bad, and we assume it will happen regardless (i very much believe this), then wouldn't now be the time to "do this"? Now seems the best we can hope for. To learn from the experience.

In my view humanity will experience this regardless. I suspect we need to learn sooner than later. Whatever we may learn from it.

Thoughts?
When you say "come over to science", where are you thinking? My impression is that industry -> academia is an almost impossible jump to make. Do you mean industry doing science?
So if the government does science research that is classified, that doesn't count as science because it's not publicly shared?
I don't like them. I will just go home and tell others to have fun. More pizza for others and less bored faces. I guess it is win-win for everyone.
US and South Korea have a defense treaty equivalent to NATO. US doesn’t need to send troops cause they are already there. An entire division.
I don't think he will be a disaster, steve ballmer wasn't . The concern is it will be mediocre. Profits but just enough to make investors happy in the short term. You can be very profitable and not be #1 or a leader.

And keep in mind, google's winning strategy has been to overhire and drain the talent pool from its competition. Laying off people to follow a trend is utter incompetence when those people are your ultimate winning strategy.
What you're saying makes sense, and I think I appreciate the point behind the examples you provided.

I think it would help your argument if you could point to such an example from the last couple of years, after the cutoff point of the LLM training data. Maybe though, nothing has been invented since then that is sufficiently unique. If there is something like that, I suppose it would be possible to try and prompt the LLM to create it. That would make your argument falsifiable and I'd be really curious to know the outcome.
You should definitely make your states hierarchical: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167642387... https://statecharts.dev/what-is-a-statechart.html That's a much better way to manage the complexity of large state machines.

But I think the problem you're going to find with trying to make a "pure data" representation is how can you express a next state for a state machine if that next state depends on some decision made by running some code? You'll end up just expressing the code in an alternate language. (Maybe there's a way of doing it but I'm not seeing it ...)

Here's a custom state machine representation we came up with a while back to express the state transitions of quite a complex protocol. It looks like code (in fact, the file is *.c) but it's not normal C. It works more like yacc in that the code fragments are disentangled from the state machine and output to another C file where there is a huge, generated switch statement, but no one has to write or maintain the switch statement.

https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/blob/424420a55bab1a8ec9ac...
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/blob/424420a55bab1a8ec9ac...
> I thought it was pretty commonplace to hire a lawyer to draft various application, bylaws, policies and stuff like that when founding a company, online or not.

No it’s not. You can go to nolo.com and pay less than $300 to get incorporated

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/forming-corporation

Even if you choose to hire a lawyer to do it, it’s a relatively simple process and it would cost a lot more to hire a lawyer who knows the technicalities of something like the GDPR and whether it’s applicable to your website.

Should I also include the lawyer in my product planning meeting?

> GDPR really is very simple at the core: you are not allowed to collect personal information, unless. 99% of it are definitions of those exceptions.

If it’s so simple, then why is it 99 sections and 11 chapter.
Intelligence: Here is how you can remove this fence.

Wisdom: Should we really be removing this fence?
The black market of... AI models that require proprietary cleaned datasets and $100 million of compute to build?
Also "Oceania" according to ISO 3166-1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_d...
and if your manager hands you a $100 bill, and expenses it (or took it from petty cash) now you're suddenly the recipient of tax fraud.

is the IRS going to actually care? probably not, unless it was systematic and notable, but see: https://www.irs.gov/government-entities/federal-state-local-...

>Cash Benefits

>Cash is generally intended as a wage, and usually provides no administrative burden to account for. Cash therefore cannot be a de minimis fringe benefit. An exception is provided for occasional meal or transportation money to enable an employee to work overtime. The benefit must be provided so that employee can work an unusual, extended schedule. The benefit is not excludable for any regular scheduled hours, even if they include overtime. The employee must actually work the overtime.

> Meal money calculated on the basis of number of hours worked is not de minimis and is taxable wages.

(this stuff is why some managers will just buy pizza for everyone from their personal money, and never bother expensing it, paperwork is not worth it)
> is good systems design... expect of computers

The computer, in this case, was instructed to take on a human role.

My point is that if you ask a computer to critique a highly subjective medium, then as a user, this is what I'd expect if I knew that system wasn't allowed to save it's previous responses (for some reason... Maybe bad system design?)

The entire point of taking on a role as a professor isn't to give a final grade. It's to teach what the student could do to make their work better. And the LLM did an excellent job at that.

Maybe that's bad system design, but the model this system is taking on is one in academia.
I think you like your reasoning kept oversimplified too.

I like the exact way the simple things as OP, eg: for media player I use android total commander:)

But the reasonong is just wrong. The problem with the phone is that it's extremely hard to find quality sw.

Exactly in a way as finding good, dedicated hw. The problem is the same: there is no review site niether of them.

PS: of course there are lots of details, like when hw flaws come to surface and users could write that to others, there is a new hw model. And lots and lots of them, no chance thet a testing company could test enough.
Why don't we just ask ChatGPT about itself? Duh. /s
The bias is on the people asserting people have innate capabilities that are not a derivative of pattern recognition.
"Twitter Write @twitterwrite" tweets:

"We’re making improvements to the writing and reading experience on Twitter! Starting today, Twitter now supports Tweets up to 10,000 characters in length, with bold and italic text formatting.

Sign up for Twitter Blue to access these new features, and apply to enable Subscriptions on your account to earn income directly on Twitter. Tap on “Monetization” in settings to apply today."

---

Almost all reactions i have seen so far have been negative. This is not seen as an improvement.

I agree: The character limit was the genius idea that made twitter successful.

People don't go on twitter to read long essays. I'm left wondering: Who will write the first browser add-on that automatically hides these long tweets? Here's an example tweet if you need one: https://twitter.com/M_w14_/status/1646254742375395331