skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> You are free to deny medical care for yourself based on your religious views (e.g. not accepting blood), but your religion means nothing when it comes to other people’s freedoms

Religion is not really relevant here. If the fetus is a person then aborting them is denying other people's freedom.

The question of when along the path of human development one becomes a person is not inherently a religious question.

I know many atheists for example who are fine with banning abortions of healthy fetuses that are moments away from birth unless there is something about the birth that would put the mother at unusual risk. That's because they can't find a way to count a newborn baby as a person but exclude a soon to be born fetus because nothing changes between those two times in the things that they consider relevant for determining personhood.
Make your own WSJ-style 'hedcut' stipple portrait [HTTPS://aiportrait.wsj.com/]
Web LLM runs the vicuna-7B LLM in the browser and it’s impressive
Frames were the OG SPA
I mean…it’s a PR issue more than anything. I know what webp is and I had never heard of jpeg-xl.

I think that’s true for a lot of people. Maybe one of them is better, but webp definitely has a distribution advantage by a mile.
I didn't say it is slavery. That is on you. Though, I would not be shocked to see these complaints more in minority heavy environments.

My assertion is only to be careful with complaints on respect. All too often the folks that are complaining on it haven't done their part in giving it, either.

And I make no claims that this is a new or unique perspective. 30 years ago, I recall books and shows already touching it.
> As a result if you are a government or many large companies you simply cannot download Linux and YOLO it.

Experience begs to differ
It may be a good idea to lower current consumption, but it's by no means necessary. The available renewable resource is very large. Total world rate of primary energy consumption is around 18 TW (which might correspond to 10 TW of work); the world is constantly being hit by 100,000 TW of sunlight.
> Ardour has a fully MVC architecture, with a backend that knows nothing about any of the multiple frontends that can exist for it (GUI, MIDI, OSC/UDP, OSC/WebSocket). We do not use RAD tools, there is no generated code.

In that case, you know that the call site is never “telling the front end to bring up a dialog box”

> I was the 2nd employee at Amazon

Well I’m the millionth something employee at Amazon :). But as far as generating a view. I’m thinking of something like the home grown (publicly discussed) tools that AWS has so that when the service team introduced a new API, we have tools that can automatically generate SDKs in all of the supported languages and the CLI. Why couldn’t a custom tool create native views?
Hey

Again we know for a fact that Adobe has “millions of lines of native Cocoa”. Why is it so hard for you to believe that the front end is hand coded by native developers?

Even at one 200 person company I use to work for we had dedicated web, Android, IOS and desktop developers.

But even when you aren’t using RAD tools, you are still defining your views some kind of way with XML, config files or something.
BTW, I’ve been a continuous hands on ”programmer” (we didn’t call ourselves developers back then) since the mid 80s when I was a hobbyist 65C02.
Yes, but at least “From summer 2023 onwards, it will be permanently downloadable from this site.”

RemindMe! 3 months
> Although, did the kindermoord movement actually ban larger consumer vehicles? I thought it was more about street/city design.

Big SUVs weren't around in those days so they didn't have to. This is what the Dutch were up against in the 70s: https://www.amsterdamclassictours.com/uploads/3/0/2/2/302228...
I disagree with her conclusion. Raw salmon has no inherent pathogens of interest. People eat salmon raw at sushi bars. I’d be pretty unconcerned about the food safety issue. (Like any food there’s some risk of cross contamination, but that’s so rare.)

As someone who has dealt with food safety (both as a hobbyist and professionally) a lot I can tell you most of what you read is based on government recommendations, which are designed to keep the dumbest and unhealthiest people from hurting themselves. The government doesn’t get thanked when you eat delicious, not-overcooked food but they do get blamed when people get sick, so their incentive is to tell you to overcook everything. There’s no reason you need to get that thanksgiving turkey to 165 or whatever the hell they recommend, but they do it because they know a lot of people will measure the turkey in the wrong spot so if they told you the actual 145 a lot of people would be eating breasts that never got close to 130.

I don’t know why you’d want to cook your salmon in the dishwasher, but the time/temp is absolutely fine for anyone not immunocompromised.

So I would say that her video showed that it doesn’t bring it up to the temperature recommended by (I assume) the FDA, but not that it is unsafe, as those are two very different things.
Select * from images where item='car'

Select * from images where color='red' and item='light' and tag='traffic'.

Select * from voice where token='brrrrr'
I definitely planned on watching both of these and just completely forgot about them. They should just use this money on a Dreamcast 2 instead!
It was the gateway to a career in software for several people that I know. It's a pity we don't trust users with freedom like that anymore.
As wonderfully absurd as this is, I learned more about TypeScript’s type system from this post than I have from its documentation.

Entirely possible that PEBKAC, but I’ve found TypeScript’s documentation to be on the worse end of the programming language documentation quality spectrum.
The same reasoning could have applied to AVIF and WebP a few years ago. Nobody used these formats back then, so what's the problem if Google discontinues them?
From my point of view, this is one of those cases where structural typing just doesn't work all that well when used for OOP.

Typescript does give you a solution to this problem, namely that you use generics to constrain the parameters of your method:

let append_animals = <T extends Animal>(animals: T[], animal: T) => animals.push(animal)

Your example now gives the expected error.

TypeScript does indeed have its quirks, but most of them do not really matter for real-life purposes or can easily be worked around like in the example above.
From a parent's perspective.

> Teachers cannot discipline the students, either. Doing so gets them calls from angry parents, or in trouble with the administration that got said calls.

Neither can parents discipline much, especially in public and particularly fathers. Everyone is a critic today, if you look at your own child wrong there is a call and complaint against you to DCFS or the police. It's not just teachers.

The foundational issue though is feminism, it's a long term social experiment running on live subjects before you. The results are not good.

Particular to child behavior is children are sent to daycare/preschool/kindergarten too early. They need more years to learn from and model healthy adults before they are thrown in with a bunch of children who have not matured themselves.

Start school several years later. Send mothers back home for those years. Things will improve.
The most successful APIs I've worked with have been done this way.

In one project we were rebuilding an old outdated UI. We started with being very strict about literally only implementing what was needed for frontend, for example not even a GET /widgets/{id} until there was a UI that needed it. We also explicitly built new models for this, separate from our database models, so it wasn't just "return everything in the table": if the UI only displayed half the fields, that's what was returned. A big benefit of this mindset was when we needed a list of things from joining multiple tables, there was no thought of pushing this to the front-end; we just made a viewmodel, did the work server-side and returned it.

Also, pretty early on we implemented Swagger (OpenAPI) and built in docs to our code. This helped establish it as a part of dev and the coding style that any new devs quickly bought into, as opposed to an afterthought everyone sees as a chore.

After we had a a dozen or so APIs done, we started opening it to customers. We'd add new things they'd request (but our UI didn't need), but strictly kept the use-case-first mindset, as well as continuing the UI port (page-by-page, effectively). Even a few years later, the feedback from our developer users was overwhelmingly positive, along the lines of "this is the best API I've ever used".
I’ll caveat by saying it’s been a while since I looked into it but last I checked the UIs weren’t super intuitive. This is a rare tech thing my entire family uses so that’s a much bigger factor than it usually is for me. I admit there’s also an extent to which Jellyfin can’t win here: my family always knows the Plex apps very well, switching would be a pain and (from their perspective at least) not have any notable advantages.
Other commenters have the right of the response here. If every platform has hundreds of nations & many thousands of provinces (states in the US) that can make arbitrary rules, the internet loses the magic of being an online place where human spirit can congregate & connect.

The internet has been at the fore for a while as a deeply Western-democratic free speech agent, a way to let people share & find out, to support many view. The authoritarian impulse to control & dictate, the view of the party, the small.minded, the dictatorial ought have no extra sway or swagger here.

This hearkens back directly to JP Barlow's Declaration of Independence Of Cyberspace. Which speaks to the freedom. From shitty tyrannies of the mind & spaces, large & small. Which is almost certainly among the top 10 things most submitted to HN. https://hn.algolia.com/?q=Declaration+of+independence+of+cyb...

It's a pity this submission is flagged. This is such at the heart of the online experience, and the threats against it.
Former MP and his brother shot dead on live TV in India
That is an extreme underestimate.
If you need it to be pixel-perfect it will probably disappoint, yes. It's good enough for the few times I have made use of it. (It's also open-source, so you can always contribute improvements)
Hugged to death?

What is a wiki farm??
Responsive websites pretty much killed this type of aesthetic. It would be an absolute nightmare to get this sort of design to work well while supporting mobile.

It's a real pity, because the hybrid designs we get now all looks like a bunch of uninspired rectangles.
Reaching into on-prem hardware from the cloud is a substantial engineering effort, and one that can land you in the news if you do it wrong.
Reading this makes me so sad. We (humanity) just seem to be unable to figure out how to live a sustainable life that coexists with nature. A huge failure of the imagination. A massive thanks to Eric of ESG Hound for doing this work.
You point to a key issue I have heard from multiple teachers: They have basically no options for a kid that is out of control.

If a kid is punching and kicking them or another student they are not supposed to touch the student they are supposed to remove all of the other students and call support. Depending on the support person, some of them are unwilling to pick up and remove a student. Everyone is concerned with being sued. Admins don’t want to suspend or expel because that is a bad data point. And how good they are at their job is based on data. They don’t want to remove them from the classroom because what else do they do with that kid? And removing a child from the classroom makes the parent complain, anyway, so it is a lose, lose.

This leads to teachers feeling option-less and it only takes one child to basically hold an entire classroom hostage.

The comparison is when I was a student and those students existed but were quickly removed from the classroom, usually physically as they threw punches at the support person and anyone else within arm length.
It is not sufficient to merely fund something, you have to competently execute on it too. The US education system has more than adequately funding, but suffers from terrible administration.

On top of that schools are tasked with too much stuff. On top of general education, schools have to deal with child hunger, child abuse, mental well being, gender and sexuality issues. These should all be separate government provided services. Do we want our teachers to be educators or social servants?
If even part of this analysis is accurate then the launch could be a public relations catastrophe for SpaceX. Especially as it sounds like there are options available to mitigate the issues but aren’t being taken due to costs and time.
I’ll provide an unpopular opinion. People who rigidly stick to the “furthest left lane at all possible moments” are far more dangerous than middle lane hoggers. I witness many, usually white vans, who seem to want to enforce this rule seemingly moving constantly like a pawn on a chessboard. I think some people (not suggesting you) don’t seem to recognise that in congestion, 3 lanes actually provide more capacity than 1, and that it’s not possible or logical to stick to the left lane at all times/conditions. I will yield that the far right lane is sacred and you really do need to be demonstrating some significant overtaking to be sticking in that lane.
Is there no way to appeal this in the court systems? If it is such a flagrant violation of authority, then there should be a way to hold it back, right?
Maximum image size for AVIF is 65535x65535, no idea where you're all picking up this crock.
For non Irish/UK citizens there will 100% be checks for passports and visa on ferries at the very least.
> Do you think the government has any right to try to have “over site” because the (Democratic) VPs wife got in a tizzy in the 80s because her little ears couldn’t handle NWA releasing a song called “Fuck the Police”?

Sure. I was there; I remember. I think it was a waste of time but ultimately harmless; it resulted in a few (private, moneyed) corporations deciding not to sell some music that the government had mandated be labeled (which, to be clear, is a wide power the government has; perhaps overused here, but it's no a violation of anyone's rights that they make companies put the ingredient lists on food). Then the Internet happened and that whole thing became irrelevant.

Florida is a great example to study these money-power-vs-political-power effects, because were the tables reversed people currently supporting Disney would be horrified. Imagine it was Rupert Murdoch and Fox World with an ultra-right-white-national enclave utterly immune to legal oversight, and the duly-elected Democratic government trying impotently to reign them in. Much as I like the result of Disney;s pushback, the means are deeply disquieting and speak to a completely-dysfunctional corporate-power-vs-state-power relationship that is ripe for abuse. And the wheels of corporate power turn glacially relative to government power; DeSantis, barring a state constitutional amendment, is gone in 2024 as a state governor, but Rupert Murdoch was CEO of News Corp / Fox for 36 years.

I'm not 100% for corporate power or 100% for government power. I'm for balancing and pitting the two against each other because they're both effective tools for checking the worst abuses of the other. And make no mistake: when it comes to the FAANGs, what we're seeing is patterns of abuse that need to be reigned in. Requirements for auditing and oversight can be overdone, but in practice, in 2023, the tech sector has been allowed to run with a laissez-faire attitude for decades and has become a vital piece of the modern societal fabric; as a general principle, anything that vital to daily human experience for most citizens needs government oversight to ensure its legal compliance before it becomes Standard Oil or Bell Telephone or Microsoft or Fox Media or, indeed, Disney... Something unanswerable to all but itself.

This era of existence is marked by humanity trying to forge a path between a 1984 future and a Brave New World future. There are no simple answers for power allocation.
Datasciene Libraries for Python
sure it is. many aspects of the continent are subject to federal governance, and before that was the case, much of the social and infrastructural development was interdependent due to support+direction from the us in the west and the soviet union in the east
De-Stressing Booking.com (2019)
There is also caste based discrimination among latinos.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casta

It is taboo to talk about it, but it does exist. Some people won't acknowledge it.

Go to any latino company and you will find that there is a racial hierarchy among employees, where race is also a predictor of how far you can be promoted.

You can also see it in advertisement, marketing, TV hosts, and all the dumb drama shows on Netflix, and the leadership of fake "latinx" institutions (if you say "latinx" you likely grew up in a mansion).

If you created an unlabeled dataset with the faces of every employee in a latino company, with the same background and dressed in the same way, and then created a ML model to predict their seniority in a company, the most accurate model would be the one that used race and last name as a factor.
According to the lead researcher, yes.

While anecdotal, her sleep improved significantly within 1 or 2 days of starting this new diet.

I believe she also cites improvements across cognitive symptoms - both her own symptoms and also more broadly, why it would help generally for others. Unfortunately my own LC brain fog is inhibiting my recall of the specifics.

I’m glad to hear she has found relief and hopefully others will, too. I’ll give it a try if I muster sufficient motivation and if this approach is acclaimed by some more positive anectdotes (especially those people who report an abrupt improvement in symptoms). I looked up her treatment regimen and it does sound like quite a hassle. But the risks sound manageable especially in light of the potential benefits.
Call me jaded, but I am tired of these doomer takes. It seems like every place on earth is filled with "unique biodiversity" these days.

And Musk's unwillingness to do years of extra "safety precaution" studies, bi-lingual outreach, etc. seems like a (rational) unwillingness to play by the rules of people who overtly hate Musk and want him to fail.

And yes, if you take the worst possible possibility for everything, it does look potentially bad. But that's extremely unlikely. And, if it does happen, SpaceX will have to fix it before they launch a second rocket.
Russia absolutely made a rational decision.

A bad one, because their facts were wrong, but one based off calculations rather than rolling dice:

+ Russian Cold War-era (and refits of same) military materiel is reaching obsolescence and end of life. Russia can't afford to modernize its military at scale (hence the obsession with announcing prototype superweapons)

+ US and European ties are at a low point, as a consequence of the Trump presidency

+ US is focused on China as a peer threat

+ Germany is uniquely diplomatically vulnerable to gas energy pressure, but only until additional renewables come online, transmission infrastructure is upgraded, and efficiency measures implemented (see the Nord Stream bombing whodoneit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Nord_Stream_pipeline_sa... )

+ Remaining ex-Warsaw Pact / non-NATO countries are likely accede to NATO in the next few years (see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enlargement_of_NATO#Current_... )

... ergo, there was no better time to make the attempt than now. Everyone just assumed Putin wouldn't be stupid enough to try.

But that calculation looks very different without the energy vulnerability, as Russia understands the economic difference between themselves and Germany.
And that exact mindset made them totally irrelevant in the real world.
The FSFE and other organizations like the EFF and the EDRI are much more relevant and have a bigger impact than an org which still insists on using devices from 2007
Selling stock on public markets of a company is fine. A company whose business model is inherently linked to the continuation of physical warfare having the ability to sell stock is fine. When that company has the ability to use that capital to purchase the government, then it becomes a problem.
> I expected more from our agencies, from the press

What do you call a take that reads as incredibly naive, but you suspect the author is old enough not to really be that naive? Hyperbole? Affected surprise?
> a democratically elected government, whose authority is constrained by independent courts, free media, fair elections and so on.

Yeah yeah, something, something Iraq prisoners, Guantanamo bay.

But seriously, again, China can do jackshit to the person even if they have his entire life data, vs US if it finds certain word or conversation or searches related to certain term.
I think it's foolish that people are afraid of Chinese spyware rather than being paranoid about every spyware.
Misalignment Museum
I must be failing to understand your comment. The people complaining are FSF, and no matter how hard I squint, I cannot see how fair competition could require Google to be the first one to support a standard that literally nobody else supports.
Battlesnake – Multiplayer Coding Game
I made this mistake this year, I was pleased with my payrise even though given inflation it was a cut.
You do not need to cook salmon to any temperature. They don’t inherently have food-borne pathogens. People eat it raw. Most salmon-related illnesses come from processed salmon (like smoked) where cross contamination introduces listeria.

Also, most bacteria actually begin to die at around 130F, which her chart I think shows it gets well above. (It looks like it gets into the low 60s, which is well above that.)

Also I’m pretty sure the only food-borne pathogen that forms spores is clostridium botulinum, and that’s not found in fish.
Tldr: recruiters are trying to bait workers with contract work at the company they’ve just been laid off from, but then turn around and submit them to many other companies instead.

> Lawrence Dearth, the president of staffing company Insight Global, said the average recruiter is simply hoping to make contact with a talented individual. After the initial contact, they’ll ship the worker’s resume out to 10 to 15 different companies.