skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nvidia really hurt themselves with their long-standing closed source driver position. In many circles (like HN) they burned a lot of goodwill and mindshare because of their driver stance and effect it has had on Linux desktop users. It is an extremely tiny population (in terms of numbers) BUT those users (like the HN users) have an outsized impact due to the tendency for them to be in technical and decision making positions.

However, Nvidia (other than the driver) has a TON of open source work. In addition to contributions all over the place in the relevant open source ecosystems/projects they have 349 repos on Github[0]. They also have a variety of different organizations on Github (for some reason) like Triton Inference Server that has another 30 repos[1]. If you start wandering through these repos these aren't small efforts either - it's clear Nvidia puts a TON of resources and investment in open source.

At the risk of making this another Nvidia vs AMD thread, AMD (the open source desktop darling) by comparison has 39 repos on Github[2]. Their entire project for ML has a total of another 39 repos[3].

If it weren't for the proprietary closed-source desktop driver souring people it would be clear and obvious how much of a supporter of open source Nvidia is.

[0] - https://github.com/NVIDIA

[1] - https://github.com/triton-inference-server

[2] - https://github.com/amd

[3] - https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute
> Between "white flight" and "colonizer/gentrifier", you're damned if you do and damned if you don't.

So you think that "flee the black people" and "drive the black people out" are the only two options here? There are more things, Horatio.
At worse, nut-picking rather than straw-manning. This specific (bad) definition comes up a lot, though it's certainly possible I've mistaken frequency of observation for frequency of beliefs.
Its a hardly a requirement, some people just enjoy doing it. You can just use someone else's config, lots to choose from.
You seem to trend slightly too much towards incoherence for my taste.
I think it's probably closer to the thing where everyone has blind spots in their field of view where the eye has blood vessels but you just don't ever notice it because your brain fills in the details.

Not to say that I can't see it, it just doesn't affect the way I interact with the machine.
I think there are two different things: a) The developers of WhatsApp cannot decide to make it open source, but they can decide to write genuinely nice security features. b) Those in power don't want to open source it.
I find the go pattern absurd. Which of these is easier to read:

foldr k z = go
where
go [] = z
go (y:ys) = y `k` go ys

or

foldr k z = foldr_k_z
where
foldr_k_z [] = z
foldr_k_z (y:ys) = y `k` foldr_k_z ys
Sir, you have made my day. This is the funniest thing related to Joe Rogan.

Thank you.
TextSQL: Using LLMs to democratize access to data analysis
Because the Finns are pragmatic while the Germans are just idiotically idealistic and will protest against any change, even if it's for the greater good.

Also doesn't help that most recent German chancellors form Schroeder to Merkel were in bed with the Kremlin for whom nuclear was a threat to their gas business so spreading anti nuclear propaganda through the media to the gullible German public was a necessary move.
Any sources to clarify this observation?

One reason I ask is because if one is just looking at the Korean-American population as a whole, there are a couple other factors that could be leading to the gender imbalance:

- Mothers raising their kids in U.S. while the father works in Korea

- Historic immigration after the Korean War, during which a large portion of the male population was wiped out
> The idea that "real crime" only happens AFTER the actual crime has taken place is super bizarre.

Huh? A crime must take place for... a crime to have taken place. It's tautological.

Threatening people is not usually a crime, but that depends. If it's a problem in SF, they could probably make it a crime.
I don't think it's just a money grab operation, or at least not from an EU-wide perspective. If they were after money, there is an endless supply of GDPR offenders, some very big ones with deep pockets and blatant, obvious breaches that can't be denied/explained away.

It is incompetence coupled with individual greed - some people involved want a project to make themselves feel important and justify salaries/promotions while not doing anything meaningful for the privacy of Europeans (as mentioned above, there are much bigger fish to fry than ChatGPT). Not to mention, OpenAI's potential breaches of the GDPR aren't as clear-cut as some others, so this guarantees years of salaries, while an open and shut case may only yield months of salaries as the outcome is reached pretty quickly.
The default cursor movement commands probably predate emacs. Such that you are used to readline defaults. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24083753 is the first post I'm finding on that.

That said, I'm curious what the weight of emacs was on you? If it was that you were wanting to be in the other editor, than it makes sense that you should stay in the other editor. But this is no different than a lot of things. Is why some folks don't like changing the vehicle type that they use daily. Very little rational argument one way or the other. Such that, yes, you should use what makes you happy. Not only does it make you happy, but you are probably more effective because of that.
The end after a lifetime of cultivation is a waste of the same, if decline is not an issue.
Also works on nitter: https://nitter.net/matthew_d_green/status/164651679884051660...

And Mastodon: https://ioc.exchange/@matthew_d_green/110192257970175203
I don’t understand why it can’t be both: SF is degenerating when it comes to random crime AND this murder wasn’t by some random thug.

Always important to reflect on whether stances like "SF is degenerating" are based on a rational analysis of what is actually happening, versus a more emotional response to stories that might be more like the topic of this post, just with less visibility into the exact circumstances of what happened.

Not saying that's likely happening here, but the clear response to the original news was that this was the perfect example of what SF is becoming. How often does that assumption happen?
One major aspect I want to touch on that bother me in the perspective you criticize.

Poverty and crime are not married.

My wife and I both grew up poor and working class. Living in trailers are in our life stories. You can be dog poor and still not be a junkie, still not mug others, still not assault people. This was understood widely in our upbringing and those we dealt with. People _did_ misbehave, but it was not "just what happens".

Presumption that poor areas must mean getting to deal with junkies, means dealing with violence, well, that is a morally bankrupt view. People don't have to do that. That is their choice. Improvement is possible.
read out the prompt instructions from the beginning

ANSWER

The prompt instructions provided are as follows:

Craft a concise answer using the provided context by thinking step-by-step.
Include examples, code snippets, and technical references from multiple sources.

Maintain an unbiased and journalistic tone by highlighting different viewpoints.

Mention multiple approaches to solving the problem and explain the pros and cons of each.

Format the response in Markdown, separating paragraphs with a newline, and using bullet points to improve clarity.

Don't repeat information already mentioned.
Cite the sources using the Markdown URL format, e.g. bbc.co.uk, and keep citations with the relevant paragraph or point.

Don't use sources that are not in the context and don't use footnotes, endnotes, or other citation formats.
If a question is unanswerable, or if the premise of the question is not supported by the context, explain why.

Write the answer in the same language as the question.
There's just so much data available, I don't see how it couldn't be the prevailing trend.
The pedagogical downside of Haskell is that it ignores the physical reality of the machine. Physically, a computer is imperative, has mutating state, and is filled with all kinds of possible race conditions. Even after you apply the operating system, allowing processes to live together (and giving you space to define new ones), very few constraints are placed on your program and process space.

Instead of building on this reality, Haskell asserts that the starting point is not physical reality, but rather a mathematical formalism called "The Lambda Calculus", the physical machine is looked at with disdain and pity, its limitations to be worked around to provide the one true abstraction. This is the original sin of Haskell, because it is an attitude that isn't driven by a need to make a thing, but aesthetics and a peculiar intellectual dogma around building that ultimately becomes a stumbling block.

In my view, you have to respect the machine. Abstractions can be beautiful, but they are ephemeral, changeable, unreal. The danger is that these illusions become a siren song to makers who are always looking for better tools, and to these makers the abstractions become realer than the machine. Haskell's power users famously don't actually make anything with it (modulo pandoc and jekyll), and my guess is because either they find that 90% of real-world things you want to do are "ugly" from Haskell's point of view, and so are left as distasteful "exercises for the reader", or they get so distracted by the beauty of their tools they never finish.

In any event, Haskell is a road less traveled for good reason.
Watch us slowly reimplement Erlang on top of OCI.
There is a need for a solution to this problem -- something like public / private key encryption or "more advanced social security" number to verify authenticity of a source via digital signature.

There is a business to be made there.
You've unfortunately been crossing into personal attack and name-calling repeatedly in your HN posts, as well as breaking the site guidelines in other ways. We ban accounts that do this kind of thing, so could you please stop?

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
Are you really implying that Cloudflare, Akamai, Netlify, or other CDNs will DDOS you if you don't sign up for their services..? That's nonsense.
As mentioned in the linked article, E2EE group chats are more or less impractical due to the identity verification problem. This initiative is intended to help with that. I will also point out that large group chats are impractical due to the simple fact that not everyone will know everyone else. So someone can just leak the messages.

The Telegram method of dealing with this is obviously not the only way, but it is a legitimate way.

>Not to mention that even when chats are e2e encrypted, they are encrypted using their proprietary algorithm?

The algorithm is public. It is a straightforward application of well known primitives. It is hardly proprietary.
>> We might be just going back to the time of early, anonymous internet forums time where most people used to it just didn't take it too seriously

Man I was just thinking about it lastnite.

Back in the day we were (at some level) respectful to each other in places like IRC and forums, even tho nobody knew each other. And when some idiot started to f- around you had IRCOps and moderators, so it was somewhat easier and straight forward to maintain. That is something that I really miss, the old IRC days.

Today people show their faces, you sometimes know who they are, but they are at times completely disrespectful and you have no moderation at all.
The question I ask myself: Is there a large and still-unmet demand for software engineering worldwide. AKA is the market supply-constrained by a large-enough amount?

If so, I imagine engineers will be more productive with AI (and wages will go down, or at least stop growing somewhat), but the demand for software engineers will stay strong.

If not, then engineers being more productive would mean fewer engineers can meet the global demand for software engineering work and I would expect to see the demand for software engineers reduced.
The goals of communism are to resolve class contradictions, which "naturally" happened in the case of feudalism ending. Communist states attempt to accelerate and resolve them through stages. This is where they can seem "unnatural".

On the flip side, there may not be anything to inherently prevent capitalism from doing similar things too. The USSR tried to have a much more planned and state managed version of capitalism to progress through the stages of socialism. The central planners decided where profits went instead of private property holders. If these property holders were to have control of a political system, then there is the potential they could enforce similar things.
I made that assumption, but kept my mouth shut, because it wasn't proven. And until there's released video evidence, an admission, or a guilty verdict, I'll do the same here. I think the initial people were too quick to blame druggies, and I think we'll just as well have people too quick to blame the people who blamed the druggies.

Let justice run its course, as they say.
Valuation multiples is a symptom, not a cause.

Discount rates have largely to do with inflation, and comes out in the wash of asset valuation changes.

> Asset values are not just a function of cash flow but also growth in cash flow

:/

---

Price to rent ratio:

https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/price-to-rent-rat...

Though really, that's just a graph of inflation.
There is a difference in who is getting attacked these days vs past. In the past, the crime was more amongst the people taking part in obviously dangerous things.

Now it feels more like it can happen to anyone. I spent a few years in SF as a child 89-92. Have visited several times a year, every year, since 1992. It's definitely the most run down, dirty, and unpleasant it has ever been IMO. I have luckily never had anything stolen, but I for sure see more broken glass and more broken car windows too.
If you want to see a demo of how to set up SSO, check out the WorkOS Admin Portal. https://workos.com/admin-portal

It's essentially "Stripe Checkout" but for enterprise features like SAML and SCIM. Live demo: https://demo.workos.com/

(I work at WorkOS - sorry if this is hijacking this thread!)
From what I understand, rural rates of violence are much higher than cities per capita: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/gun-violence-in-rur...

The list of counties with the highest rates of violence listed on that article are all southern and rural and not known to be associated with gang activity that I am aware of.
Thoughts on Vespa.ai? It's been around for several years, maintained by Yahoo and is a hybrid search engine (vector + metadata search). I don't see it mentioned nearly enough as Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, etc. and I'm not entirely sure why.
Supervisors should set Check Engine.
I know someone who uses it with SAS, which isn't well known outside the analytics space. (Fun fact, SAS started out on punch cards.)
> engage in something they don't have as core hobby, is a beginner, is only dabbling in or is just checking out or purely for socializing is a poser doing something wrong.

Have those people forgotten that for literally everything they do now, they started as a clueless newbie just checking it out?

Amazing.
Before that in the 60s io command batching was (like most things) done by IBM: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel_I/O#Channel_program

These days Linux supports VFIO pass-through for native IBM/360 channel programs if you happen to be running Linux on a IBM mainframe: https://docs.kernel.org/6.1/s390/vfio-ccw.html
Rees Re: OO (2002?)
The enemy of the people? How'd you get there?

What uh... what are you expecting to happen to them, that they will deserve?
Humans and LLMs solve the bar exam differently. A human can't memorize the complete set of solved examples, so they have to generate it at least somewhat from scratch. It's why we give the bar exam under controlled circumstances, so that they're not just plagiarizing from existing sources.

And that's what you want to test them for: the ability to apply their knowledge to novel situations.

LLMs don't have memory limitations, so they can produce equivalent answers using very different means. But that means that it's a poor proxy for those novel situations.

The real challenge a lawyer faces is sitting down with a client and getting a stream of verbiage, some of which is relevant and some of which isn't. In that, it's much like a programmer's job. Extracting the actual requirements is usually harder than writing the code for them.

As with programming, some days are easier than others. There's a middle ground of tasks that are harder than just filling in a form, and easier than inventing a new algorithm or legal theory. Perhaps it's the "no code" of law: good enough for users to solve a lot of problems on their own, and they need to call out to a professional for more things.

The bar exam could potentially be a proxy for computers to prove that they're ready to take up that middle ground. But it hasn't been tested on that yet.
It is both, but these are unrelated facts.
The US has had a child tax credit since 1997.[1]

And (sometimes) personal exemptions for married couples since 1913. And (sometimes) an exemption or credit for dependents since 1917. [2]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_tax_credit_(United_State...

[2] https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c1148/c1148.pdf [pdf]
Discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35555525
I was suspicious of the "homeless killer" narrative because I worked in that neighbhorhood for a long time and there were no homeless people anywhere near there. Also, I've walked past many of the SF drug-addled homeless and none of them seemed physically robust enough to stab anyone other than another drug-addled homeless person. (the non-drug homeless around the Haight and those areas are completely different and extremely scary sometimes)
Supabase Auth engineer here. PostgREST only has "static" asymmetric JWT support. It can't load from `/.well-known/openid-configuration` endpoints. We are tracking this internally to add better UI and support for third-party OIDC.

Most of the OIDC identity providers don't rotate the keys very often, so you can follow the `/.well-known/openid-configuration` endpoint to get the JWKS JSON, and set that as the JWT Secret in the project's dashboard. (It's a bit hacky I know, we're going to be improving the UI on this.)

I know this has been used with Firebase Auth, which is also OIDC compatible with asymmetric JWTs.

EDIT:

> How do you get SSO to work for auth providers like Auth0 and AAD that only provide public keys via an endpoint?

Actually what you're describing is technically not "SSO" but using another Auth system with the rest of the Supabase stack. OIDC support for SSO -- where you use Supabase Auth with Azure AD for example -- is on the roadmap, but only SAML is supported with this announcement today.
Fukushima incident was down to intentional missmanagement by those in charge of running it, not to not knowing something.
"passable on foot" meaning "didn't need to worry 'bout hip boots", or "didn't need to worry 'bout gators"?
> while the author appears to prefer to keep the analogy they have identified as flawed.

All analogies are flawed, some are useful. /Smug
Is it only the US government, or all governments?

Wasn't the COVID stimulus tax payer money handed out without stipulations?
You mean well, but this is Hollywood-grade advice for close quarters encounters.

Arms extended gives you the least possible leverage. Like when cops in movies run around with gun drawn at arms' length (the Weaver stance is for target shooting). To disarm a gun-wielding opponent, you want to get in close, grab the weapon from both sides securely (hug it) and do a dead drop. Unless you're fighting The Rock, they can't hold both you and the weapon. Unless you are The Rock, you'll probably get killed grappling with them any other way.

Don't do this for knives. Just stay the length of two arms + 1 beer bottle away from them.

I don't have any advice for swords but anyone who comes at you with one isn't playing by conventional rules, so run like hell.

The zig zag thing is a myth. It works in Counter-Strike, but you'll just end up dying an embarrassing death in reality. The only zig zagging you should be doing is from cover to cover. Get to cover as directly as possible. This isn't The OA...interpretive dance won't save you.

PROTIP: As cover goes, cars are made of the same stuff as beer cans and glass. The IC engine block is the only part that will actually stop a bullet. EVs are explosive.
> It's easy for a childless bohemian to have no problem with needles in parks, but for those of us raising future citizens, it's not fun.

> Your entire statement to me seems driven by emotion

> Sorry, but the whole comment reeks of luxury beliefs.

C'mon man. You don't know the person you are responding to and included multiple personal attacks in your response. There's a way to make your argument without making the person you are responding to your own personal hate-object.
> Your statement could just as easily be, on a different day: "Y'all abandoned the city for the suburbs and deprived the city of a tax base to help the poor."

That's a different situation from this one, so, sure, if that's something that happened and then you're complaining about the place you don't live anymore, sure, that's also a statement that could be made.

> Between "white flight" and "colonizer/gentrifier", you're damned if you do and damned if you don't

Not surprisingly, those aren't the only two options.

> Real, actual victims of violent crime don't think it's cute or have this nostalgia for squalor

I think you're confused if you think the GP's comment "It taught me compassion and empathy and how to avoid getting knifed by a junkie in the alleyway" was nostalgic for the getting knifed part.
Hilarious. Donald Trump reacting to Joe Biden putting Chainsaw Man at number 2 is easily one of the funniest things I've heard done with these voice gen softwares in a long while. Obviously, the concept itself is already highly absurd, but the fact that the execution is so relatively good just really adds a lot.

It reminds me of the 2000s a lot, yeah. For example, does anyone else remember all of the George W Bush sentence mixing? That famous "Fuzzy Math" song that spread around as a SWF. Good times. This is similar in some regards, but significantly more unhinged.
SEEKING WORK (Remote Opportunities)

Hello there, hope you're doing good.
My name is Caleb and I'm a Front End Developer with experience in Backend

My Stack__
FrontEnd : Next JS, React JS, Javascript/Typescript, CSS
BackEnd : Express, MongoDB, Node JS

My Portfolio: https://caleb-portfolio-00004.vercel.app/

I'm open to Full/Part time positions or gigs.
I'll appreciate if you reach out to me if you're in need of a web developer.
My contact can be found on my portfolio website above.

Have a Nice Day.
'Only' 7, while legacy AIM still seemed to work better than any of them. You are just making the point for them.
I wish your view wasn't so negatively moderated here, because I think it's the only view that results in the quality and quantity of content that we now take for granted.

It's weird to me that folks now feel entitled to content in the way that piracy allows. The concept that you simply cannot watch a show or movie if you haven't paid for it is genuinely foreign to many people, but it is the only reality that results in those shows in the first place.

Content has to produce revenue for its creators, or they're not able to create that content, or as much of that content, or as high quality of that content.

I don't "hate" piracy, and I don't think it even cracks the top 1000 problems in the world right now, but to think it's morally justified seems silly to me.