skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"a rotor spinning one Way/DesxtroGiro, and the inside rotor flow Goes VS in the other at front against contrary/LevoGiro"
But the Blades (with the Gear) move in favor at that circumstances. Thats why is possible. The Interaction of two forces to make One.
That Particular Mechanics Technique Goes increasing Two forces in One: Force1/Rotor-DextroGiro VS Force2/inFlow-LevoGiro. front to Front.

*

·RETRODYNAMIC Effect / Some Points of View:

I always explain it well, but another thing is that you don't understand it.
As if it were an everyday question.

And they don't take it as a disruption, which changes schemes.

Because they really wouldn't even know about it. Being a subject that nobody has ever really dealt with.

*

And also to you can see it as an encrypted information.
And I know the best translator, for sure.
And they don't take it as a disruption, which changes schemes.
Because they really wouldn't even know about it. Being a subject that nobody has ever really dealt with.
But the concept it's a simple sum, then keep going to increase the phenomenal interaction.
Let me make a simple caparison: One Turn is One step, OK, Well in this particular case.
When you do One Turn is One Step, And Then is another turn are gone to be Two Steps.
And in the next turn are gone to be Four steps, And the next Turn are gone to be 8 Steps. Etc...
Really too to be able to explain it, needs to invent a new Mathematical Signal. Brand New.
I Tell You. It’s Like That.

*

I'm going to explain them perfectly well. We are going to make a comparison that each turn of the Rotor (applied in my case/Gearturbine) is a Step. It's fine. And So now when the rotor rotates with the power of the mechanical drive (Action). And furthermore, it has the internal flow contrary to its rotation (Reaction), but in favor of the individual blade attached to the gear with planetary rotation that activates the Rotor. In such a case they are two forces in a single system.

*

Maybe it doesn't have the best translation, but that's something else, that's not the point. But that would in no way be something that could belittle his qualities and technical virtues. And at the end of the day, all the explanations you can have are in the operation of the system. And this could not be easier to appreciate, Summed up in a simple sum. And in this case of 2Two Forces: 1Action + 2Reaction Applied in a single cycle, and thus also a single system.

·A) 1Action VS/+ 2Reaction = ?
·B) 1DestroGiro VS/+ 2Levogiro = ?
·C)1Rotary Move VS/+ 2InFlow Way = ?

Note: ·I use the "VS" Because the dynamic interaction is front to front, that's why.
·And is Added force one to the other, that's why I use the Sume/Plus mathematical symbol.
·A, B, and C are the same situation with a different word, from a different, technical view.

Other Note: If somebody doesn't understand Cut be because of some reason. Not because my responsibility.
I typed “What country has the highest lowest place?” into chatgpt 4 and 3.5 and both explained Lesotho. Is it not correct?
And mythology would like to thank the cavemen for their compelling cave paintings and campfire stories, which laid the groundwork for millennia of creative storytelling. Without those early artists, who knows where we'd be? Probably still trying to come up with a punchline for "Why did the mammoth cross the glacier?"
Spreadsheets are still more impactful and useful than ChatGPT.
>The second being to mitigate the accumulation of insects around my campsite.

If this was your house, maybe, okay. However, when you go camping, you are technically a guest in the bug's house.
I'd love to hear the authors thoughts on Tink. It seems to have similar properties to NaCL, wondering why it isn't mentioned. I'm guessing low adoption?
Google search results went from great to passable to atrocious over the last fifteen years. Part of that is their refusal to maintain an index of older content, in an effort to trim costs. There are searches that I used to make ten years ago that yielded the info I was looking for, and it’s as if the info never existed existed. Part of that may be that the sites are gone, but I did read that Google simply doesn’t want to pay the cost of maintaining that older index as time goes by.

This is all to say - Google could have not let it’s search product become a hopeless piece of garbage before the threat of real competition emerged.
Behind child unemployment?
This article's word choice using terms like "larping" and "cosplaying" to talk about Mark Twain on a history site seems like a less than ideal writing style; it made me stop reading and facepalm for a moment.
It's a wikipedia article, and that sentence is intended to establish that the topic is notable: that "serious people take it seriously". It needs to establish this in the minds of a very diverse group of readers. For some readers, Alan Turing is a serious person whose opinion matters; for others, Elon Musk is a serious person whose opinion matters; for others, nobody's opinion matters except their own.
This plus the fact that you never really get the same room of the picture are the reasons I don't reserve hotels with platforms like this. Either I reserve directly with the hotel or I just walk in.
For what it's worth if you actually want to get help on the state of the art on this stuff the best place to ask is the 4chan /g/ /sdg/ threads, and you can absolutely diffuse images that large using TiledVAE and Mixture of Diffusers or Multidiffusion, both of which are part of the Tiled Diffusion plugin for auto1111.

https://i.imgur.com/zOMarKc.jpg

Here's an example using various techniques I've gathered from those 4chan threads. (yes I know it's 4chan but just ignore the idiots and ask for catboxes, you'll learn much faster than anywhere else, at least that was the case for me after exhausting the resources on github/reddit/various discords)
As a further aside, that phoenixmag.com link appears to be a (deliberately?) misconfigured server. I send "Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate" and it responds with "Content-Encoding: br", resulting in a page of complete rubbish.
Not sure what kind of "argument" the poster is expecting, but I consider it fairly obvious that an entity that

1. is as far superior to humans as humans are to ants (pick your favorite alternative analogy), and

2. does not share any evolutionary or social commonality with humans

is both extremely dangerous and extremely unpredictable.

While I'm not completely convinced by the "AGI = annihilation" idea that LessWrong seems to be so sure about (for the simple reason that I don't believe anyone is capable of predicting with any certainty how a super-human entity would actually behave), the idea that AGI is just "another risk we need to learn to manage" (quote from the Twitter thread) sure does sound naive.
I read this too and they went on to say the following.

Other mechanisms might contribute to the arrival of insects at nocturnal light sources over longer ranges. For instance, insects do use celestial compasses for nocturnal navigation, and artificial light sources may interfere with these heading
cues. But even at long distances artificial light sources often remain brighter than the night sky and may cause dorsal tilting that would also steer an insect towards a light source.

But I thought I interpreted their earlier point that this isn't the reason they're drawn the light.

I recently read a book which said that Moths use the moon for the navigation and artificial light throws off that process, becoming entrapped.
It’s usually a big production to get from the terminal to the nearest building that’s not airport property. Especially with hand luggage. Even if you could waltz in and out, I don’t see it.
No Source Code == No Patent
To clarify when things are upscaled like that they typically mean a section of img2img in a grid pattern to make up the full picture so it doesn’t overuse vram.
Not the GP but I've been a pilot for about 6 years and have friends who are controllers, and being a controller is entirely different, and pretty difficult.

You can fly VFR without services and you really only have to worry about yourself. There's no equivalent as an ATC. You're often working multiple frequencies on your own. Even if you don't typically do it on your own, if your coworkers gets sick now you are. I've had friends manage two tower frequencies as well as ground due to staffing issues.

Not to mention the fact that when you become a controller it's much like the military where you get assigned a place and you go there. You get preferences of course, but there's only so many suburban airport controllers needed - somebody needs to be in JFK tower and somebody needs to be in the middle of nowhere Montana and they're not flying in for their shift the way pilots can.

I'm inclined to trust the FAA's data that it's just not feasible to dump training resources into someone who statistically is either not going to make it or is going to quit if they don't get their preferred assignment and find out they need to move their family to Utah.
GNU has some interesting things to say about this.

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html

However this page is a little out of date :)
Latest InFlow Generation: State of the Art Novel InFlow Tech: ·1-Gearturbine Reaction Turbine Rotary Turbo, ·2-Imploturbocompressor Impulse Turbine 1 Compression Step:

·1-Gearturbine: Reaction Turbine, ·Rotary-Turbo, Similar System of the Aeolipile ·Heron Steam Device from 10-70 AD, ·With Retrodynamic = DextroGiro/RPM VS LevoGiro/InFlow, + ·Ying Yang Circular Power Type, ·Non Waste Parasitic Power Looses Type, ·8-X,Y Thermodynamic Cycle Way Steps.

·2-Imploturbocompressor: Impulse Turbine, ·Implo-Ducted, One Moving Part System Excellence Design, · InFlow Goes from Macro-Flow to Micro-Flow by Implosion/And Inverse, ·One Compression Step, ·Circular Dynamic Motion. Implosion Way Type, ·Same Nature of a Hurricane Satellite View.

http://stateoftheartnovelinflowtech.blogspot.com

https://padlet.com/gearturbine/un2slbar3s94
When Google search blew all the other search engines completely out of the water. Knowing how to effectively use google was a kind of superpower/time saver so it was very refreshing and made you very effective compared to people who were not using it. ChatGPT feels like we're on the edge of that, for certain cases it can accelerate work. Maybe not for everything, but we're still finding out what it can be good at.
Delta Denoising Score
Yeah but there is a difference between efficiency of theoretical concepts and efficiency of expressing practical tasks.
That's a really good explanation I hadn't thought of: an example of deploying both-side-ism when both-side-ism is desperately needed. Shrewd, but I wonder if it was intentional or just the outcome of an editing war of egos.
The consequences of failure in America are higher, that’s why we work so hard. You are a millionaire, or you are homeless. The in between is a hard and continuous struggle to get to the former and avoid becoming the latter.
besides whether artists should get paid or not, or whether they should be reimbursed for use of their art or not,
using something without permission, or rights, or license, without something that'd actually (legally) enable to do so without violating copyright,
is just bad in itself.

there's a great alternative to "not paying/refusing to pay" (but using and stealing stuff anyway) - just, not using other people's stuff. not using stuff that's built on copyright/license violations. not using artwork you don't own, that you don't have rights, licenses, or permissions to use. (yes, simply 'taking something and making a model from it', would be a violation.) one could just not do a shitty thing, and they wouldn't have to jump hoops to find any justification for the shitty thing they did.

they could do a step-by-step art tutorial, and wouldn't have to pay anybody, nor use tools that rely on stolen artwork. but nope.

highly ironic how they made this thing, and promptly showed it off to thousands of people on the internet, immediately invalidating your example

they also promote (just by choosing and mentioning all of these things) those services, like Replicate, that monetize the use of stolen artwork (by selling compute, directly coupled with nn models), and ultimately profit from it (solely, without "giving back to artists whose art they perused" or anything).

they could make art in a way that wouldn't participate in tech art theft racket, but they didn't. and they didn't just participate in it, but promote it and perpetuate it.
I've used Google's ORTools and Microsoft Z3. If you need to input a lot of variables, I found Z3 to be better since it took SMTLIB formatted text as one big chunk- rather than numerous API calls which each suffer native binding overhead. Z3 can also iteratively solve, where you can append additional constraints and rerun the solver from its current position- I don't think ORTools had this feature.
on a long enough timeframe, we're all guests in the bugs house.
I hope at least one of them comments on that.
Generally I agree, but have one big disagreement with those statements.

>> It's much simpler to just mark fields as private with some convention. If callers want to muck with your struct, they will.

Agreed, and people mucking with my struct is usually the least of my worries. If a user wants to do that, I say go to town.

The "ask for the size first" approach has one major advantage compared to shipping the full struct:

1) You can hide all the random-ass internal structs you use, which can greatly reduce the amount of header code you have to ship. I like shipping a single header w/ a static lib and this can be a huge win for that use case. Note that I don't want to hide the internal stuff because I think users are incompetent and will ruin both our days by doing something dumb. I want to hide noise that they would literally never care about, and don't need definitions for.

That all said, packaging an API is pretty tricky to get right and depends a lot on the actual functionality. Maybe we work on different subject matter, and therefore have different views.
I'm curious why you specified IRL.
Do I really need to start busting out the clips with 1986 timestamps on them?
The only problem to that, and a big one, is that there’s no way to trace back to the image in the dataset from a final output of AI.

It’s a static mapping, surely it should be possible, you’d think, but NN frameworks aren’t designed that way. That is blocking it from happening(and also allowing “AI is just learning, human is same” fallacy)
All that'll do is break-up the organized tuition system (which may be a good thing and probably has the biggest impact in organized tuition-crazy places like China) and encourage small-scale/individual setups (also may be a good thing but depends). How will you ban individuals across the globe offering lessons over Zoom? That is what has been the net result of the ban as per the article - people are resorting to "underground" means.

Plus a ban only extends to within a country so people in other countries will go right ahead with their tuition. Competition is global and such bans, beyond dismantling the tuition "business" and putting up hurdles in front of parent's craze for the rat-race, don't do much. Nobody is talking about the root cause, which is the fear of unemployment due to scarcity of opportunities.

All the while, the very well-off will continue to manage perfectly with plenty of workarounds available to them, as usual. All these bans would do to create another class of have's and have not's.
I didn’t mean my comment about this tweet exchange as an example, I was only trying to speak to the comment I replied to about a general trend. This particular exchange is not the problem; it’s the inability for the public to gauge when it’s not like this, though, if that makes sense.
ChatGPT is now writing college essays, and higher ed has a big problem
Current Calc 2 student here. I would be braindead approaching this problem honestly, I don't think I'd even know how to begin; I'm hoping that's normal.

Why would the exponent be equal to x/2 - floor(x/2) be equal to x/2 on the interval [0, 2)? And how does the graph of x/2 - floor(x/2) imply anything about the behavior of e^(x/2 - floor(x/2))? I'm hoping I just haven't learned enough yet?
Personally I'm a bit tired of Yudkowsky's domination of this narrative. He's right about one thing, no one is a perfect predictor. There really is no way to know in advance how this is going to play out, no matter how many thought experiments you undertake.

The doom scenarios are of course vaguely plausible, but I don't trust anyone's percentages. It's a real unknown unknown.

Personally, I suspect it's inevitable that if we create true agi, it will come to dominate the space of intelligent conscious beings on Earth. attempts to corral it, rein it in, bend it to our will and make it our tool seem bound to fail. But then this is just me prognosticating, and I don't have the platform that he has.
sorry I was thinking of bluetooth - for handsfree and music
In aggregate, I'm sure that's true, but there are all sorts in society, including people who have little capacity to earn money in the first place, let alone save it. That includes, for example, orphans, people with severe physical or mental disabilities, drug addicts, elderly people who lose their savings to fraud, and so on. Taking care of these people does create an economic burden on society that might come at the cost of some economic growth. But that's a choice, and for many people, a public social safety net that takes care of people in need is deemed worth the cost.

When you're falling out of a plane, it doesn't matter how strong your incentive to fly is. You aren't going to grow wings by incentive alone.
What I've found is that any large refactoring project that works against Conway's law will fail, until the plan adjusts to the org structure. This can be very explicit, in that one group will refuse to support it, or latent, in which teams won't use the new project until it is reworked to support them.

The sad thing is that pretty much every large refactor that I've seen has started as an explicit attempt to remove the 'smell' of the software architecture being built off of the org structure.
I laughed when I read that GCM is hard for library authors. I remember trying to implement GCM but failing, so I decided to transcribe a "simple implementation" but failed at that also.

Then I decided to try OCB mode and it worked on the first try.

By the way, isn't OCB unpatented as of recently?
You and I seem to have a lot in common. Been employed, done entrepreneurship, don't mind long hours.

I find it interesting how people navigate these tradeoffs. I'm 38, married with two kids (one 3, the other 6mos). It's BUSY. Especially because my wife has a good career, which for better or worse, is a big part of her identity and something she'll never not do (building architecture). Given that we'll always have her salary, I manage a couple rental properties part time, plus have taken a few swings at getting bootstrapped products out the door with mixed success.

I honestly don't know whether you or I have it "easier". I have friends with stay-at-home spouses. I envy their ability to just go to work and focus. I spent today (Sunday) fixing our dryer, going to the grocery store, and doing other chores a stay-at-home wife might handle during the week. I work almost every weekend doing either housework, tax prep, or other stuff. On the other hand, I know we'll never not eat, so the financial stress is a lot less than a one-income household trying something entrepreneurial. Unless you're either really rich or have saved a lot (and willing to risk it), it's hard seeing how someone in that position, especially with kids in a high COL area, can make it work without taking a big salary out of the company (and getting financing to do it). It seems borderline impossible.

I think raising two kids is at least one "full time job", probably more because it's not just 9-5 Monday-Friday. If you're in a two-working spouse family with kids, I think it's very difficult to work more than 45-50 hours/week, and that's assuming you have daycare. There's just SO MUCH to do. Laundry, groceries, dishes, and meal prep are easily 15-20h/week for a family of four. Add to that taking kids to/from childcare/school, putting them to bed, bathing them, keeping them entertained on the weekends, doctors' appointments, and the rest, it gets tough to work more than 50h/week with a working spouse. I think 70 is basically not doable unless you're OK going days at a time not seeing your kids, and even then, only one spouse/partner can really do it.
This field has created a lot of writings but, as far as I can tell, no knowledge. The subject matter of this field does not exist. I don't think you need to know much of anything to match the supposed experts. Watching Terminator is probably good enough.
GP mentioned in another comment that they don't actually follow the algorithm described by userbinator -- checking the return address for a preceding call -- which would increase the number of false positives a lot.
Almost the same fraction of people speak English at home in Canada as in the US.
Ugh, wow, that sounds unbelievably frustrating, sorry you and your kids had to go through that. Thanks for sharing your story.
Obligatory Harrison Bergeron short story.

See https://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html
My home office is a large table, Herman miller chair, a book case, an old cup/mug as a pen holder for pens, highlighters, marker pens, good mouse and mechanical keyboard.

I keep reference books and notebooks to hand.

A larger whiteboard would be nice I have a small half whiteboard / half cork pin board. Post-it notes.

A movable desk lamp with colour tone options (white - orange light) and brightness options.

Two monitors although in truth I use my laptop screen and one monitor most often. I think one large monitor 32”+ would be good for me.

I’ve been learning more about design and thinking about my workspace as a “studio” more than a workspace for purely laptop work. I Would like a second large table in the middle of the room to sit at to sketch and mind map etc.

I wrote some notes about this:

A good workspace should:

- promote/enable good design

- promote the idea of software craftsmanship (using tactile materials and work on paper as part of the process helps)

- promote creative output without worrying about that output being final.

- enable reading more

- enable writing more and prefer evergreen notes and writing over temporary/time based writing when learning or making technical notes.

- aim for a functional space and digital minimalism.
Exactly. It is like ants predicting humans inventing iPhones
I am certain that perceptions of AI/robotic danger are more cultural, emotional reactions that reasoned ones, if that helps. Some papers for your perusal:

Cross-Cultural Differences in Comfort with Humanlike Robots: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12369-022-009...

Culture and Attitude Towards Robots: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/25209/1/JNS_Review%20Manuscript_Re...

These are just a couple of quick links I found that weren't behind paywalls, to illustrate how culturally-bound these types of perceptions are.
Are you describing case systems/declension here?
Years ago, when I was still in tech, an interviewer asked me how to time something using burning rope, or something like that. Most have probably seen the puzzle.

I'd seen it before, but couldn't remember how to do it, and couldn't figure it out.

I said "Just tell me the answer."

He recommended me for hire anyway.

Months later I asked him why he asked such a ridiculous question. He said he wanted to know how I think. So I asked him, how do I think?

He didn't really have an answer. He either hadn't thought that far ahead while planning the interview, or didn't have enough information to tell him how I think, or he was too polite to say that I really just don't think.
California has some law that if you pay more than certain amount, you have to do it electronically or there is a 10% fine