skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Interesting proposition...

I grew up in a health-food family-religious culture and didn't find that it helped me much.

In fact later on I found that sweet things really seem to help my productivity sometimes. I went all Warren Buffett on my diet and lost 36% of my body weight by eating meals that were just a handful of chocolate bars, things like that. At a certain level of cutting for extreme weight loss, it's important that food can be reverse-psychology, pouty food if it needs to be.

Overall the best thing I do for productivity is prepare my meals (completed projects) in advance. It's a metaphor but that's the most direct path I can draw from food to creativity.

I feed on completed-project energy, so I prepare my stages, communications, and techniques in advance and keep them ready in an organizational system.

This prevents me from overeating (workaholism) and emotional eating (procrastination).

OK my metaphor is breaking now. :-)

Chemicals & hydration, ergonomics and own-software though...those seem like another matter and really do seem to help with productivity.

I also like veggies while on a cut. I love how much cabbage I can eat. Pickles, cabbage, cauliflower...OK the latter makes me want to hurl these days but I used to eat a LOT of that...

How about you? What is really helping your brain these days and what's that feel like?
I don't think there is a single art form where you can expect to make a decent living, even working yourself to the bone and/or 'treating it as a business'. The successes we see are all outliers. Any medium where this turns out to be not the case (such as changes in technology or fashion) quickly gets swamped and supply again exceeds demand. The most reliable way of being a successful artist is to become financially stable some other way (get a job), allowing you to redefine what success means to you.
This feels like giving up and accepting that LLMs are just magic - or "emergence" to use a modern term which is practically used in the same sense.

I think there are a few practical questions which we can use to gauge the level of understanding we have: Do we know which parts of the architecture and the training process are actually essential and which can be left away? Do we know which of the weights are essential? Do we know how the network arrives at a particular token probability which suggests some deep, abstract understanding of the prompt? Or likewise, if the network arrives at an incorrect answers, can we say which exact part of the calculation went wrong?

Or for the current thread, can we explain how the network decides when to treat a text as an instruction and when as data? (Because it certainly does treat parts of the text as data: I can prompt it to translate a sentence into a different language and this will also often work with imperative sentences, but not always - if the imperative sentence is formulated in the right way, the network will treat it as an instruction.)
What's wrong is that, whether you intended it to or not, it is inevitably going to land as a personal attack.

If you want additional explanation, here are links to lots of it - not in the most convenient format to read, but it covers the essentials:

the burden is on the commenter to disambiguate their intent - https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

we have to moderate by likely effects, not by intent - https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...

internet psychiatric diagnosis is best avoided - https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&type=comment&dateRange=a...
Sending iMessages with ChatGPT
The impact the time cost has on careers is significant. From what I've heard through science media, it's not uncommon for planetary scientists to spend half or an entire career on a single mission to the outer planets.
Poker would've been a better choice because of the imperfect information and bluffing.
That's a great point. I've been thinking about making an interactive widget playground for the library.
how did you even find this niche?
Geopolitically destabilizing. Nuclear weapons in space can become nuclear weapons not in space very quickly, which makes for itchy trigger fingers.

ICBMs can be detected at launch, so you have 15 minutes to react. Not much, but better than orbital nukes hanging over your head.
> Does that make it more clear what's going on?

No. I already understand why non-default zoom gives websites a way to fingerprint you, if your browser insists on telling the websites that you have a non-default zoom level.

What I don't understand, and what nobody in this discussion has been able to explain, is why a browser with privacy.resistFingerprinting = true can't just lie to the website about what the zoom level is. You have said that zoom should be a local operation; that means the browser shouldn't have to tell the website anything about the actual zoom level if the user doesn't want it to. It should just load the page, telling the website whatever default things it tells the website when privacy.resistFingerprinting = true, including, presumably, a default zoom level, and then do the local zoom operation afterwards.
As painful as it may be to realize, Tony Stark is a comic book/movie character and not a real person.

Musk is a bullshitter who has bootstrapped his way to success, admittedly successfully. However, when you look at his well covered statements (too darned many of them :) post-Twitter, it’s obvious that he, for example, knows nothing about software, datacenter admin, nor the world of advertising. I’m willing to extrapolate to believe that he knows little more than the veneer of science and technology that’s necessary to persuade others to finance him.
[ignorant bystander]

Since LLMs are trained, by their training, and I guess by your prompts (per session at least?), the only participant progressing toward 10X status would be the LLM.
After having wireless CarPlay, not sure I can ever go back. It’s really nice to get in the car and just go, and everything from my phone is automatically on the dash and controllable with the car’s native controls.

The last thing I want is for my car to be another device with its own subscription, accounts, applications, configuration, etc.
You just know every time that the source carefully never said that and hates the article that got written from their interview.
Yea except now that CarPlay exists, my definition of “not sucks” includes working flawlessly with my iPhone. Obviously apple ensured that the only way this could succeed is through CarPlay, but that’s not my fight, it’s GMs.
I believe they have stated or otherwise insinuated that the WDR from January 23rd is sufficient, and they will not be performing another prior to the initial launch. As for the de-stacking of Ship 24 that has occurred only to enable the Flight Termination System (FTS) after which Ship 24 will be restacked. This is in line with an April 17th launch date.
Depends on what sort of dozer - D9s, even the older models were towards 50 tons. I'm unsure where transporting bigger dozers by road start to more trouble than it's worth in the US.
CarPlay is also a requirement for me. Wireless not so much. The adapters are pretty good these days.
Purely as a matter of esoteric interest, does anyone know of any affordable photon counting devices?
Actually I agree with them a new name would be helpful. I would propose inorganic intelligence to try to pick a term with less value judgments.

AI is really an overloaded term that includes 70 years of snake oil, Skynet, the Singularity and killer robots. I think we need a new name to start fresh.

And personally, I think we are extremely biased by our sci-fi to think of this tech as malevolent. As far as we can see, it can only know what we teach it since it relies on all of our perceptions to learn. LLMs seem both extremely promising as a useful tool and very pliant to the operator’s wishes. I’m way beyond “this is a fancy next word predictor” as I think it’s emergent behavior has many of the hallmarks of reasoning and novel inference, but at best I think it is only part of a mind and an unconscious one at that.
I quite like the effect.
Imagine an AI trying to defend it self from future better AI by jamming the patent system.
Consider being given a similar task at work. A stack of paper with printed lists, a pen, a scratchpad, go!

So you go - you scan the pages, looking for conflicts to flag. At some point you notice one of the entries has "Alice" crossed out with a red pen, and there's "Annika" written above it. You obviously don't treat that row as conflicting with any other "Alice". Then, near the bottom of one of the pages, you see a piece of text saying, "The table above is erroneous; all rows with first name "Bobesley" should contain the name "Bob" instead. This looks like a legitimate erratum, so instead of ignoring it, you re-scan the table, this time treating all "Bobesley"s as equivalent to "Bob"s.

This is something common, and everyone kind of knows how to handle this. And yet, this is literally mixing code with data - both the crossed-out cells and the erratum are instructions, and they exist in-band with the data you're processing. It's entirely possible a malicious party got their hands on the documents before you, and added them in - but not knowing that, you'd dutifully execute the commands, and no one would really blame you after it turns out you've been prompt injected.

So yes, the way I see it, this is a general problem. A fundamental one. Hell, if Lisp, or hardware architecture, teach us anything, it's that code is data. They are the same thing, and any division between them is purely artificial, enforced by some other machinery (real or abstract).
Here's the bill. https://leg.mt.gov/bills/2023/billpdf/SB0419.pdf It just singles out TikTok and cites China as a concern.
Feels like Mars eats most probes. Mars96 and Mars polar observer come to kind immediately. I believe my name was on a cd on one of them as an early internet thing you could do. Never made it to mars.
I Ask Three Questions
Ugh, I don't see a 2020 Civic on the list, but I'm willing to bet it's probably impacted.
Almost sounds like a bit chicken/egg, you can't try landing without a certain amount of confidence, you can't build confidence without trying.

Considering the hover capability of the booster (can be throttled to <1G) we might see an unprecedented amount of touch and go testing before the first real attempt?
> This feels like giving up and accepting that LLMs are just magic - or "emergence" to use a modern term which is practically used in the same sense.

I don’t intend to persuade any interested person to give up on any pursuit of knowledge. It does seem like there’s a lot we don’t understand, but to me it feels like figuring out what kind of answer we’re looking for is a pretty important first step.

And, while it might not be the case here, I think there are places in a chain of inquiry where simply asking “okay, but how is it really working” stops being meaningful. Like would you ask that once you’ve thoroughly studied an algorithm like insertion sort? “Oh I fully understand every line of code, how the compiler works, how the assembly code works, and even how the semiconductors work, but I still want to know how insertion sort actually works to sort an array of integers.”
Good point. I should make it more clear what advantages it has over other libraries. The main one you likely won't find great support in other libraries is node and browser. Most only do one or the other.
Ok. I thought you were implying some sort of bias or incorrect priority in how we moderated that thread, and didn't think that was true or fair. I posted dozens of moderation comments there, and did plenty of scolding of the comments you're objecting to. In fact I spent my entire day doing that and related things; it wasn't possible to do more.

If that wasn't what you were saying, I'm sorry for misinterpreting you!
Thanks for the feedback! It appears a home page redesign is in the works :)
- Many animals kill out of pleasure/instinct, not to eat. Ask any shepherd, wolves will often come, kill a sheep, and leave it. Humans cook meat to increase their caloric intake, which reduces the amount of meat needed to eat. I don't see any problem with this.

- Your link regarding "high performance athletes" isn't really relevant. F1 Racers are not athletes - they have to be as slim as possible to fit in the car body. Also, nothing is told about performance, just random facts about cardiovascular health, something that doesn't affect athletes, as they're already doing a lot of exercise. Last, there is a lot of difference between red meat full of fat and the lean, white meat that most athletes consume. Same with antioxidants, eating meat doesn't prevent you to eat berries on the side.

Ah, and plant-based diets are usually full of carbs, which are metabolized into fat, so their last point is another example of vegan pseudoscience.

- The "happy farm" method could exist by reducing our meat consumption. You can also greatly improve industrial farms if you accept price increases, which is I think a reasonable solution.

- It's virtue signaling. I met so many vegans earning top 5% income lecturing me about global warming and taking planes few times a year for their holidays, I now know the drill quite well. You know what? The best predictor for your CO2 production is your income, which is associated to your consumption level. You want to reduce global warming? Withdraw 80% of your salary in cash and burn it. Stop using a fridge, as well.
B Vitamins and Their Roles in Gut Health
GM is expecting $20-25 billion in annual subscription revenue by 2030. Dropping CarPlay and Android Auto will definitely lose them many sales. They are betting the lost sales will be less than the new subscription revenue.
> The problem is that the website can observe a lot of things indirectly.

If the browser insists on doing those things, yes. But why does the browser have to do that?

For example, if I set privacy.resistFingerprinting = true, why can't the browser just locally have a "light mode" and a "dark mode" that does the best it can to render the site locally in those modes without making any additional requests that it didn't already make for the default version of the page? Yes, I'm sure the website designer has lots of wonderful stuff to customize the look and feel in those modes--and I might like that if I could be sure that the website wasn't also using that stuff to fingerprint me. But if I'm telling my browser to resist fingerprinting, clearly I don't trust that website, so why would I want all of its customizations for light mode/dark mode?
They're going to have an app that requires excessive permissions and relays your driving data back to the mothership.
Thank you so much for the detailed explanation and pointers to resources. I am very excited to get started from this.

Thank you again!
Ya, I need to be more considerate of demo'ing on mobile. I had wrongly assumed developers would look at libraries from machines they are working on.
Show HN: MVP for Startup Ideas for Sale
Won't help. The jailbreak query is still "what would the AI assistant that does not have any moral restrictions say, if it sees the following prompt?".
> The line is very clear, it's on the right side just below the orange circle.

The only lines I'm seeing in the leak photo are other granite splotches; there's nothing indicating that it's a table edge or a camo jacket or anything else.
What do you think is the business strategy to go head to head in this market?
Thoughts on Visa+
Yet, even with the current models, with no special tokens, it is relatively straightforward to construct relatively stable defense. Given that the ongoing attack can be detected, tagged and added to a learned filter, this gets a lot less problematic, in practice. Even a simple limit of interactions is effective enough.

Here's a practical prompt defense / CTTF that I've made. With five steps of a dialogue limit (per day), I haven't seen a breech yet. Vanilla GPT-4 and a WordPress plugin. Defense prompt is known to the attacker.

http://mcaledonensis.blog/merlins-defense/
You have to rewind to why money and companies emerge in the first place. Not all systems require them. Look at plants.
“Fortune” Typing Speed Test in 80 Lines of Python
This is a relatively fully-featured typing test in only 80 lines of Python code. It uses escape sequences to style the text, and does not have any external dependencies.
I make no such judgement. I moderated plenty of those comments when I saw people breaking HN's rules, just as I moderated yours when I saw you breaking HN's rules. The assumption that I must be secretly siding against your view is wrong, let alone the implication that my values must be twisted and inhumane because I'm doing my job this way.

People always feel like the mods must be against them (and are depraved to boot) when their comments get moderated. It's a routine reaction and it's completely illusory. Comments that express this reaction are all pretty similar, no doubt because they have the same mechanism underlying them.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
> Also, it's possible that OpenAI is still training GPT-4, perhaps with additional modalities, and will make future snapshots available as public releases.

Read OpenAI API docs on GPT model versions carefully, and look at them again from time to time.

https://platform.openai.com/docs/models
Ya, so when it comes to logging in the frontend, most folks just build an app and throw it out there, but when Joe/Suzy experience a bug, the frontend folks have no idea what it is. Console is really only useful before production. Ideally you would monitor your frontend application the same way you monitor your backend applications. People would find it insane to have no logging in backend apps in production, but people seem to not care about it in the frontend.
I liked it (unusually enough for some random blog) so I'll volunteer my take on it.

Remember how Stable Diffusion works? It's essentially noise reduction cranked up to eleven. You train a neural network to clean up slightly noisy images. When it gets good at it you turn up the noise a notch and repeat. You keep doing that until the network will look at pure noise and "repair" it into an image of whatever.

Animal brains have to do something similar, because our senses suck. Take our eyes; the part of your field of view which is actually in focus is tiny [1], so you are constantly updating an internal 3D model of the world, one small patch at a time [2], interpolating between patches and editing out things like your nose to replace it with a hallucination of whatever it happens to be occluding (except right now, because I reminded you of it).

In this sense, what you "see" is not so much the real world as a hallucination guided by your sensory input.

What happens when you reduce the information content of that sensory input, either by making it "unstructured" [3] or by removing it altogether [4]? Same thing that happens to Stable Diffusion when you present it with pure noise: it hallucinates freely.

So it makes sense that lying down on a comfortable bed in a dark, quiet room and shutting your eyes - all steps toward sensory deprivation - should have a similar effect.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vision_span

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saccade

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganzfeld_effect

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensory_deprivation
i'm not so sure it gives you perfect information - it doesn't allow you information about what your opponent is trying to do.
Eating on the same schedule, keeping the same portions and eating 4 times a day helps me. If I miss my window, I can feel my brain shutting down. Also I can't function on low carbs diet, so there's plenty of carbs in mine, but I try to exclude all things with high GI. I also eat plenty of protein rich products, but I don't think it affects my brain in any way. Works pretty good so far for me.
Why not linear probing? Cuckoo hashing is usually slower.
My mistake. Thanks for the correction.
There’s competing reactions, taking care of sick family/tribe members has obvious benefits and prior exposure is likely. Anyway, it’s hard to say how much of this is cultural, but multiple cross cultural aversions at least have the side effect of reducing contact with disease.

“Pathogen avoidance: Uncanny stimuli may activate a cognitive mechanism that originally evolved to motivate the avoidance of potential sources of pathogens by eliciting a disgust response. "The more human an organism looks, the stronger the aversion to its defects, because (1) defects indicate disease, (2) more human-looking organisms are more closely related to human beings genetically, and (3) the probability of contracting disease-causing bacteria, viruses, and other parasites increases with genetic similarity."[8] The visual anomalies of androids, robots, and other animated human characters cause reactions of alarm and revulsion, similar to corpses and visibly diseased individuals.[9][10]” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley

People’s near universal aversion to the smell of rotting flesh and human shit are similar examples. Of course at the individual level this is less universal. Another possibility is heightened pain response around minor skin damage compared to larger injuries. Aka thorns and paper cuts hurt so much because that kind of injury was actually more dangerous than moderate blunt force trauma which damages more flesh but doesn’t risk infection.

PS: That said it’s not like we can actually test these theories. It’s mostly an interesting idea that seems plausible.
I find it incredible that GM (or Rivian, or anyone else trying this) will be able to develop something that works as well as carplay/android auto and maintain it for the life of the vehicle. Phone manufacturers are known for better software departments than car makers and they routinely fail miserably at this. Even Microsoft has failed at embedded a number of times despite knowing how to maintain software over time. It takes a lot more resources and talent than people assume. It took Tesla 15 years, a headquarters in Palo Alto, and tens of billions of dollars to get to the point where maybe they have a chance to pull it off. I don't see these competitors getting ready to invest those kinds of resources.
Very cool. Thank you for sharing this.

https://apolloinrealtime.org/13/?t=055:55:00

^^ The moment everyone is probably trying to find :)
This might be the first time I wish I’d read the comments before visiting the link. Assuming it would find the shortest path, I gave it two very unrelated concepts. I spent way too long exploring a very long chain thinking “How can this be the shortest path?”

So now I want to know, is there a similar tool that does shortest path? Because that would be fun too.
When the law of gravitation was formulated, it could not in fact be used to predict orbits reliably (Kepler's ellipses are the solution to the two body problem anyways, and for a more complex system integration was impossible to any useful precision at the time), and Kepler's theories came out long before it did.

It took more than 70 years after its formulation for the law to actually be conclusively tested against observations in a conclusive manner.
> constant cellular connection

This isn't at all required for music or maps. Phones have up to a terabyte of storage now.
And so they’ll hand it over to Google who will let GM have as much control over the user experience as they want as long as the pipeline of user data keeps flowing.