skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It may not be rational to assume they would keep 50%+, but it was certainly the basis for the stock price.
Nope. There are tools to do that, such as SponsorBlock. I tried it but it calls home pretty often and sometimes does weird things to the videos's timing. I found it to be an annoyance. I think I did away with it, when it advertise something or tried to upsell something (forgotten). If it just ask me to buy it and keep quite and calls only Youtube/Google, it might have been OK.

It also is not available for all videos. Nonetheless, I've a feeling I should not rob off the creators, a lot of whom I follow are awesome, of their sponsor earnings.
I used to feel that way but I'm older now and I don't have the energy to fight it. Plus I enjoy studying algorithms so I'm making it work for me.
> and >90 after that

This is such a circular thing, that I feel like it is amazing to see it.

The reason LLMs use a NN is because they're trying to encode a probability function for generating the passage.

And now, you are encoding another n-gram follower exercise (i.e 1+1 = 2) on top of it :)
The author calls out several points where it's usually necessary for the interviewer to explain something to the candidate - or rather, to push them to have the insight you want them to have to progress the interview. Too bad if they have other insights they want to share! The interviewer needs you to buy into his view that the time it takes to generate your hash keys is an important part of your big-O analysis of this problem!

The danger here is that when you explain something to someone, and they get it, you get a warm fuzzy rush of happy brain chemicals. You will feel well-disposed towards candidates who appreciate and enjoy taking the breadcrumbs you feed them. Candidates who didn't think your clever insights were as clever as all that, or who fail to respond to your tutelage and try to solve it their own way... you'll get a negative feeling towards them. They're not playing your game.

That's great if you're interviewing a student to figure out if they will enjoy learning from you, and you will enjoy teaching them!

But while teacher/learner relationships might be part of your relationship with colleagues at work, it seems an odd part of the relationship to compatibility filter in an interview.
Makes me think about the "ASMR" effect and how some videos center around intentional stuff or just alternative medicine. It's like you know these crystals aren't doing jack but it's still relaxing on some level.
> not exactly the most exciting

What was the last novel number system that impressed you?
I've seen Charity Majors call this the "pendulum" model, where you swing back and forth from IC to management multiple times during your career.

I really like that: in my experience, ICs who have been managers make better ICs and vice-versa.

https://charity.wtf/2017/05/11/the-engineer-manager-pendulum...
I don’t understand why the greedy solution is wrong.

How can a word be the combination of two words if the first word isn’t a word?

So, for example, if the first letter isn’t A or I, we can stop doing lookups for any combination of just a single letter and the remainder of the word.

Etc.
> use the extra bandwidth for other projects.

This is exactly what would happen if ChatGPT was actually a productivity boost for senior devs. I don't know why some idiots on here keep insisting businesses want to get rid of people when that's not how the game works at all. Extra work capacity will always be used. Regardless of what payroll costs, what's always more important is the ROI.
I guess it depends on the illness. If it's an actually-treatable disease, maybe not totally rude to suggest (non-?)alternatives, haha.
Grasping the concept of number regardless of base system is an interesting exercise (linked to modular arithmetic), see Mathologer on times tables in any number base:

https://youtu.be/qhbuKbxJsk8
... lol. Going to a site to exchange bitcoin for cold cash seems like the worst idea ever if you want to stay anonomyous. Did everyone just forget about snowden?
I immediately started thinking of Puppy Linux when I saw that. My first Linux, d'aww...
Micro kernel-ish behavior would be features that allow for drivers/modules in userspace, which Linux does provide (and I do agree that Fuse is an example of this). eBPF is not sort of, or kind of, or remotely related to micro kernels and I'm not being pedantic. It really, really isn't related to microkernels because it is doing the exact opposite of what a microkernel does. Pluggable policy in kernelspace is not the same as running something in userspace that's implementing a system function like a filesystem, a networking stack, etc. which would be analogous to FUSE, DPDK, etc.

eBPF is no different from runtime loadable kernel modules, which has never made Linux a microkernel. Modules allow for runtime extension, but they are still running in the kernel. The point of eBPF is that kernel modules are dangerous and error prone to write, and eBPF allows non-kernel programmers to write reasonably safe modules that can also be ported to different kernels via CO-RE. They are pluggable policy points or probes.

The Fuse developers just figured out the same thing microkernel developers figured out in the late 80s/early 90s. Performance is much better if you move more processing to the kernel.
Most Popular Programming Languages on GitHub by OSS Insight
There is no way it is going to be the same job. In my opinion a lot of people are confused about what software engineering actually is and think it's about using "best practices" or the right frameworks or a certain level of code coverage.

But really the most important part of software engineering is the iteration and feedback loops at different levels. It's not that design or other considerations aren't important but without the closed loops you don't know what you are doing is effective. I think that design and code review also goes in the category of feedback loops.

SWE will be about choosing the virtual team of engineers and testers, connecting them and feeding them the right instructions, and connecting that virtual team in closed loops with real world users.

It seems very unlikely that humans will be able to keep up with the AI in software design, architecture, implementation, etc. after the next year or two. Its possible that progress will stop but there is no reason to believe that.
I rented a Tesla a couple years ago, it told me where to find chargers.
Worlds Hidden in Plain Sight
> Yes, the issues are completely orthogonal to the effective operation of an open source software foundation.

Only if you begin by presuming diversity isn't a benefit on it's own.
They do. I probably should have stated that I’m paraphrasing here. My questions were a bit more than just keywords. When I started using ChatGPT I wrote crafted prompts and I find it works well with “broken” English/keywords like I’ve done here. Anyways ChatGPT does answer these questions just wrong. It makes up APIs.

For example ask ChatGPT how to get the computer name in Powershell. The cmdlet it reccomends doesn’t exist.

When I ask ChatGPT to enumerate the displays connected to my graphics card it uses the correct cmdlet but then when I ask it to write a program to get the EDId data it makes up an API that doesn’t exist. When confronted it says you’re right that doesn’t exist.

In the case of JupyterLab it confuses Command Pallet with Command Registry and again says that there are functions called enable() and disable() which is incorrect.

The worse was when I was trying to ask about some boilerplate image processing stuff. I wanted to do a least squares fit and it completely made up APIs or recommended used libraries 10 years out of date.

I wish I could go in more detail but I did not keep any detailed records on these conversations.

My take away is that it’s great at doing boilerplate not so great at uncommon tasks.
I would argue that fascism and communism inevitably lead to mass murder because they tend towards totalitarianism and the use of terror. This comes with the caveat that the terror need not necessarily target an ethnic minority.
It strikes me as somewhat petty that the Times apparently considers the information in the leak important enough to cover so thoroughly, yet they think so little of the source of that information that they'll interview a 20 year old comedy vlogger (haven't watched channel) in the UK to get some quotes painting that source as some sort of right wing extremist group. Maybe they are, but I did not see evidence of such laid out in this article.

>But the unfiltered, edgy banter in the wow_mao server, which is called the End of Wow Mao Zone, and in many other servers like it, can sometimes veer into darker territory. Those servers are sometimes described as the less venomous cousins of 4chan, the far-right anonymous message board known for sharing conspiracy theories and popularizing QAnon. Many 4chan users split their time between Discord and 4chan, sharing digital memes and chatting with friends.

Emphasis added.
If this can be built, build a twitter clone.

As each big entity/celebrity quits twitter or starts having serious conflicts, approach them to cross-post their content to the new clone site.

In a year the masses will follow.

Once Musk misses a billion-dollar-per-year payments a few times to the Saudis they will own twitter and then it will be like TikTok censorship the next time they murder a journalist they disagree with.
I use advanced tables[0] and Excel to markdown tables[1] plugins - they make working with tables in Obsidian a bit easier.

That said, I think tables are markdown's Achilles heel - anything involving multi-line content starts to make things complicated.

[0]: https://github.com/tgrosinger/advanced-tables-obsidian

[1]: https://github.com/ganesshkumar/obsidian-excel-to-markdown-t...
Sigh. Again.

"Free software" is not coterminous with copyleft. It includes copyleft and non copyleft free licenses like BSD. Even Stallman would happily call BSD- or MIT-licensed stuff free software.

The OSD was carefully chosen to incorporate what was already known as free software.
Cambridge Analytica didn't actually work, did it?

Generally I think this idea can't work because of Goodhart's Law - people's behavior changes when you try to influence them.
> when's the last time you saw a positive _male_ role model in films or other pop-culture, tech-related or otherwise?

Do we live in the same reality?
It sounds like they did give up their rights! Or else!

Sorry, but there's no reading of it where a plea deal isn't threatening unreasonable punishment if you refuse to forfeit your rights.
I agree it sounds completely nuts, but it might be in the "so insane, it must be true" category. Time will tell, I guess, but I'm actually leaning towards "military dude wants to impress his online pals by leaking intel simply for the lols." Because that's sort of the world we live in nowadays.
Imagine the string "there is", and the dictionary {"the", "there", "is"}.
Mongo got popular at the same time and people cared more about top end benchmarks than anything else.
My bad. The dictionary should be {"the", "there", "is"}.
Register Tiling for Unstructured Sparsity in Neural Network Inference [pdf]
I wonder how many engineers who passed this "great interview question" went on to solve CSS compatibility riddles for their career, doing so in O(nobody cares) time.

Fun write-up though. The comment saying this optimizes for clever freshmen is spot on in my book.
no, they have a well earned reputation of being an incubator with little incentive for long term support
IANAL, but AFAIU:

The non-military citizens in the group are not breaking any law by possessing, discussing, or even distributing the classified material, as long as they didn't commit a crime to obtain it. It's protected speech, just like when WaPo published the Pentagon papers. However, despite no criminal liability, they could possibly be sued by the government.

On the other hand, the leaker, or anyone with a clearance, cannot legally possess or distribute the documents.
I'm not too worried if that group practices what they preach and forgo all modern medicine.

Also modern food engineering. Enjoy your easily preventable deaths, losers!

But none of them actually practice what they preach... they just pick and choose when it suits... That is the gospel truth, but I'll choose to interpret that as a metaphor...
Ok, so I’m going to come in negative, but this is how I personally really feel.

So far Tesla has inconsistent and sometimes very poor quality, horror stories of poor support, overpromising and under delivery on self-driving while dramatically raising its price, a CEO who can’t show up, constant optimization of their offer focused on cutting cost and maximizing profitability instead of securing the position of best-in-class and focusing on long-term customer loyalty (I find myself always going, “which sensors did they remove this time?”), and price increases followed by dramatic price cuts and a history of willingness to straight up just screw over recent customers with dramatic price drops.

I wanted one until all that went down. Now, I wouldn’t buy a Tesla if it was half the price. I know there’s a lot of Tesla bulls on here, but I can’t be the only one who’s just not interested in all that.

Tesla as a company is also constant drama, drama, drama. I just want my car to quietly work for a few decades without surprises.

So, the numbers might look good but the way I feel — and it’s subjective — is that what Tesla is all about is not something we want in our lives. Musk has overpromised and underdelivered on key features of the Tesla. He spent the last decade promising "that driverless Teslas are right around the corner."

But even beyond all that, I just don’t like the company direction and behavior anymore — they’ve lost me as a customer. And I know quite a few people who feel that way.

Plus, I don’t find them very comfortable to sit in. Coming from Mercedes, Honda and Toyota ownership, I just really didn’t like the interior comfort.

Not a rant against Tesla, but it’s honestly my perspective. I think Tesla is in trouble a bit, even though I see healthy margins and think the article is a lot of hooey generally. But I wonder if I’m in the minority on this stuff, because I do hear people with similar feelings to my own on fair occasion.
The discursion on macros is interesting reading: https://ianthehenry.com/posts/janet-game/the-problem-with-ma.... But it stops at Scheme’s hygienic macros, which address the very problem raised at the beginning of the discussion, in more or less the way Janet seems to work: https://legacy.cs.indiana.edu/ftp/techreports/TR356.pdf (page 4).

The issue is not so much that macros are not merely syntactic transformations, but rather than s-expressions alone aren’t sufficiently expressive to represent the syntax of any Lisp with a package system. The scheme macro system solves that by having macros return syntax objects where identifiers used in a macro can carry around a reference to the original context where the macro was defined. So referencing a function in a macro definition will look up the function in the context of where the macro is defined, and return a syntax object that refers to the correct function. To my knowledge, most modern macro systems work this way (Scheme, Dylan, etc.)
I always thought this too, "sugar" pill never sounded neutral. Maybe it should be a "water" pill.

But then we reserve the term "water pill" for pills that make you pee, gahh.

Naming pills is hard. (Let's not even talk about the risks of off-by-one errors here.)
Also every 'smart' person who thought they could talk their way out of a police interrogation and is now spending the rest of their life in prison secured by knuckle dragging brutes.

Idiot Australians who smuggle drugs to/from Indonesia come to mind.
YouTube with Ads is akin to browsing the internet with no Adblockers. I have seen people browsing around with it and I keep hearing Jane‘s voice, “I have it how I like it.”[1]

YouTube Premium is an easy fix, and with its subsidized pricing in India, it is a steal. The family plan is less than $2.5 monthly. Unfortunately, my wife would sometimes complain, “Why am I not seeing any ads? I have it how I like it.”

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDNmyyrEZho
The fact that people will pay for what's already possible for free (with not that much effort) says a lot about what's wrong with the state of the world today.

Around the turn of the century and before, there was no such sentiment. People just RE'd like it was completely natural, and in general weren't "afraid to read" what they had access to. As the saying goes, "no source, no problem." As a result, multiple alternative clients for IM and other services flourished.
> As a EU citizen I’m often puzzled and worried, why can’t the sentence just be “We need more competent leaders”? This should imply diversity per

Confirmation bias and the inertia of continuing to choosing white males for leadership positions mean that there is no such thing as meritocracy.

Even if there were (there won't be), there are issues of representation and opportunity which can only be addressed by actively seeking more diversity.
Edgy teens aren’t going to brag to a LEO, they’re going to brag to whomever gets them the most in-clique upvotes.

I’m sure WaPo was second after not getting a response from Mr. QAnon.
I'm a beginner, so I'm unable to tell if it's hallucinating or not. Do you find it hallucinates or is incorrect? I'm wary of noting stuff down and remember wrong things an don't want to drill 2 levels deep for each question
GPT3.5-turbo

We can solve this integral by using integration by parts. Let u = arctan x and dv = x dx. Then we have:

du/dx = 1/(1+x^2)
v = (1/2)x^2

Using the formula for integration by parts, we get:

∫x arctan x dx = x (arctan x) - ∫(1/2)x^2 / (1+x^2) dx

We can simplify the integral on the right-hand side by using the substitution u = 1+x^2, du/dx = 2x:

∫(1/2)x^2 / (1+x^2) dx = (1/2) ∫du/u = (1/2) ln|1+x^2| + C

Putting it all together, we have:

∫x arctan x dx = x (arctan x) - (1/2) ln|1+x^2| + C

where C is the constant of integration.

GPT-4:

To calculate the integral of x * arctan(x) dx, we'll use integration by parts, which states:

∫u dv = uv - ∫v du

First, we need to choose our u and dv:

u = arctan(x)
dv = x dx

Now, we differentiate u and integrate dv:

du = (1 / (1 + x^2)) dx
v = (1/2) x^2

Now, apply the integration by parts formula:

∫x arctan(x) dx = (1/2) x^2 arctan(x) - ∫(1/2) x^2 * (1 / (1 + x^2)) dx

Let's simplify the second integral:

∫(1/2) x^2 * (1 / (1 + x^2)) dx = (1/2) ∫x^2 / (1 + x^2) dx

Now, let's use a substitution method to solve this integral:

Let z = x^2 + 1, so dz = 2x dx. Then, x^2 = z - 1 and x dx = (1/2) dz. We can rewrite the integral in terms of z:

(1/2) ∫(z - 1) / z dz = (1/2) ∫(z / z - 1 / z) dz = (1/2) ∫(1 - 1/z) dz

Now, integrate with respect to z:

(1/2) [z - ln(|z|)] + C = (1/2) [(x^2 + 1) - ln(|x^2 + 1|)] + C

Now, plug this back into our integration by parts expression:

∫x arctan(x) dx = (1/2) x^2 arctan(x) - (1/2) [(x^2 + 1) - ln(|x^2 + 1|)] + C

So the final result is:

(1/2) x^2 arctan(x) - (1/2) x^2 - (1/2) ln(|x^2 + 1|) + C
> > NFTs is a really good use case.

> Honestly, I still don't see how. None of the explanations make any real sense to me.

I don't really think NFTs have a real use case, but i can see why it might. It is effectively a digital certificate of authenticity that cannot be faked. But like a physical certificate of authenticity, it is worth as much as the general market would place trust in it. And it isn't much, since collectors of digital goods currently do not value authenticity (realistically) - they value the actual digital good, and thus, a copy is as good as the "real thing".

Therefore, collectors can only really exist for physical goods, and thus NFTs don't actually provide much value, beyond the ability for someone to speculate with it.
Publishing an article on Forbes costs a couple hundred bucks. A bunch of "contributors" sell a spot on SEO forums. I was doing a SEO optimization for my friend's website and a black hat agency sent me a price list with pretty much all known big media websites listed in the spreadsheet.
Receiving or reading classified documents is not illegal.
I beg to differ. All the might of a superior intellect will be of no use if a bear locks a human down and starts to maul them.

The mistaken assumption that GP is talking about is related to conflating intellectual capacity with physical capacity.

Another analogy is a brain in a vat. If the brain only has read capability over the world surrounding it, then no amount of processing power can enable it to change anything about its situation.
Interstate commerce clause
According to info from another comment, he waved the statute of limitations as part of a plea deal. Not really sure how a plea deal was on the table after the statute of limitations, but there you are.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35549013
You should rest easy tonight, knowing that nobody has any plans to make you go there.
That, and also simple image to image.

Using a simple drawing of single colour shapes as the original image and a good prompt, one can get quite far in terms of composition.

The desert dome city still blows my mind every time I think about it.
e and pi wouldn't really be different. Not worse, anyway. I don't have a way to draw with those numerals here, but just swap in the digits:

(2) . (14) (7) (6) (5) (1) (17) (0) (8) (11) (0) (12) (9) (5)...

(3) . (2) (16) (12) (14) (16) (9) (16) (11) (17) (19) (9) (13) (2)...
Codeium AI Chat Is Here
> I would not, but I'm not sure what that has to do with my broader argument, since it doesn't hinge on Abrahamic religions seeing eye to eye on all topics.

Well, your whole idea of persecuting non-Abrahamists is a good example of something Abrahamists don't see eye-to-eye on. Certainly a lot of Christians are opposed to it – as I pointed out before, it violates the official teaching of the Catholic Church at the Second Vatican Council – but I don't believe all Muslims have ever agreed on it either. When Muslim rulers first conquered parts of India, and ended up ruling over Hindus and Buddhists, most of those rulers decided against extermination – and there were plenty of ulama willing to provide them with a fiqh justification for that decision.

> For example Ibn Hazm was a prominent theologian who subscribed to it.

Ibn Hazm lived before Sunni theology had settled-down into three established schools, and as such can't really be said to belong to any of them. Who follows Ibn Hazm's aqidah today? I'm guessing, if anyone does, it would be Zahiris? (who are sometimes considered a "minor Sunni maddhab", in addition to the four major ones)

> My understanding is that Ibn Taymiyyah takes the view that goodness is based on the nature of God, rather than command or foreknowledge exclusively, and that individual commands may take either side of euthyphro's dilemma, rather than being confined to one or the other.

Okay, but all Jews, Christians and Muslims agree that some divine commands are "positive" – only binding because God willed them, not because the object of the command is inherently good (for an obligation) or evil (for a prohibition). So in saying "individual commands may take either side of euthyphro's dilemma", Ibn Taymiyyah is not saying anything different from what Māturīdīs or Twelver Shi'a or Roman Catholics would say. "Hard DCT" always takes "one side" of Euthyphro's dilemma; everyone else takes "both sides" depending on the specific rule, just as Ibn Taymiyyah does. I don't actually see any difference between Ibn Taymiyyah (or Athnaris more broadly) and the Māturīdīs on this particular issue, while he clearly disagrees with the Asharites and Ibn Hazm
The post you’re replying to is talking specifically about driverless (probably electric) taxis, which will likely be a pretty different market and form factor than anything which exists today.