skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And the AoE2 DE has way higher system requirements while only looking marginally better in some aspects, but looks worse than 2 decades old 2d art in some other aspects. Just because it "has to be 3D" these days, while there is nothing truly requiring any 3D in the game.

This is subjective, but I liked some of the old unit designs more than the new ones. For example Teutonic Knights and Cataphracts looked better in my opinion. The Teutonic Knight looked leaner and taller, while it now looks a bit like a walking barrel. OK, somewhere they need to carry all that armor ... but still I liked the old ones better.

Also I would have been completely fine with units having only 8 or whatever directions in which they can look. I don't need 360° all-around rendering of units. It even substracts a little from AoE2's abstract character.

What I do like is, that they added more civs.
I have an 8300 USDT too, but I don't think it's supported in Coreboot yet. Will be looking onto that too hopefully sometime.
This sound so cool!

Does anybody know of similar games for non English speaking folks? My kid only speaks German and I have the feeling playing our first RPG will benefit from us all being on the same page in the same language.

Thanks!
Agree , good post
> On Twitter you have to hone your messages in hope the algorithms make you 'go viral'.

On the contrary, algorithms are to a large extent irrelevant. You see what the people you follow tweet and retweet. No algorithms involved. What made Twitter special is rather that you can interact with anyone. You can live in the middle of nowhere and still share knowledge and network with the best in your field. Making a copy of the platform but removing the people, also removes the whole point of Twitter.
> There was a time when people would get excited about choosing Go for a new project, regardless of it being a CLI tool, a Web application, or some system-level infrastructure. Looks like all three are getting well-covered by Rust these days. On the other hand, good old stacks like Java and .NET are not sleeping either, and improving all the time.

YMMV, obviously, but in companies within my personal bubble Go is still the go-to (heh) tool for creating both CLI tools and all kinds of API services. These kinds of choices, in my experience, mostly boil down to what kind of personnel a company has at the time, as well as personal preferences of the tech leads. And while some of them do appreciate Rust, finding good Rust devs still seems harder than good Go devs.

> Will people be as excited in building new applications with it, or will it niche itself into "that cloud and microservice thing" made by Google that we have to maintain, because a few large projects decided to use it a decade ago?

I love Go, and has been working with it for about ten years now, but I don't think it was ever an “exciting” language, once you remove the initial hype. Go has always been reductive and boring, and that has always been its greatest strength (and, in the eyes of many, its greatest weakness). You've mentioned Java and .NET, and I feel like Go has almost entered that company of languages. Boring technology, with good tooling and lots of libraries, supported by large corporations, that can deliver results within predictable time scales.

So if I had to predict the future of Go based on the current trends, I'd say it's almost definitely “more of the same”, which is, in a way, the “bright future” for the language. The tooling is going to be improved. The type system is going to get improvements too, but very slowly (my personal prediction is that we'll get sum types around 1.22–1.24; long overdue, imo). The stdlib is going to be expanded to accommodate these changes. Nothing exciting, but that's how a lot of people want it.
You're right, there seems to be some special mechanisms for x86, x86_64 and x86_32.

The asm include for x86 is here:

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/x86/inclu...

It includes either unistd_32.h or unistd_64.h. Those headers don't seem to be in the repository anymore. It seems they are generated from the system call tables as sickall mentioned and exported to user space as C header files.

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/x86/entry...

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/x86/entry...

The following commit introduced this auto-generation mechanism:

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/303395ac3bf3e2cb488...

Other architectures just define some macros which modify the behavior of the asm-generic unistd.h header. For example, the arm64 unistd.h defines macros and then just includes it:

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm64/inc...

#define __ARCH_WANT_RENAMEAT
#define __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT
#define __ARCH_WANT_SET_GET_RLIMIT
#define __ARCH_WANT_TIME32_SYSCALLS
#define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_CLONE3
#define __ARCH_WANT_MEMFD_SECRET

#include <asm-generic/unistd.h>

I suppose x86 is too old or too different to fit this paradigm.
This only works for a tiny numbers of games if the Steam client is not installed.
Rationals fail in their own spectacular ways. Take a simple approximate exponential decay: x ← (99/100) * x. In exact rational arithmetic, your program will happily calculate integers (99^k) and (100^k) for unboundedly large values of k (there's no reduction – they're all coprime), grinding the program to a halt until it runs out of memory.

"Oh, the solution is obvious: you should simply round that to an approximate fraction..." — yes, and that's floating-point arithmetic. Point is, you can't use either with thinking, about numerical representations and their possible failure modes.
That's just an example of what Fairtalk can eventually become and will either take decades or will simply never happen. Right now there's a growing frustration in the world because people feel like their voices are not being well represented or heard. This is why people go out to protest in the first place. Whenever someone protests, they'll be considered lucky to have their cardboard sign broadcasted on a popular television channel for only a few seconds. And how can you possibly convey your frustration and the message you want to share in only 3 to 5 words? It's simply impossible and there should be a better solution. We hope to make Fairtalk this new solution by giving everyone a fair chance to speak up instead of always having to release their anger on the streets.
Deep learning (multilayer perceptrons) was 1965... The timeline is pretty long.
> it’s a business after all

is it? I thought those sports organisations are not businesses but associations of the clubs. Is it different in the US?
That's very common, do you know the general why?

Usually the power brick is poorly isolated and/or you have dirty electricity, it results in errors on an ongoing basis that get logged to the small amount of onboard memory. (not usually a circular buffer.)

When the errors have sufficient volume the memory fills up, and it stops working at resource exhaustion.

In a real pinch, I've resolved this in some of the more milder cases by simply using one of those walmart plug timers that turns off for a few minutes in the morning when everyone is asleep.
However, there's no reliable way for as a user to tell if Steam will be optional for a particular game. I've tried checking pcgamingwiki but it's not always right.

And it's usually not optional.
A million years...

" Now Germany must work out what do with the deadly, high-level radioactive waste, which can remain dangerous for hundreds of thousands of years.

Currently, the nuclear waste is kept in interim storage next to the nuclear plants being decommissioned. But the search is on to find a permanent location where the waste can be stored safely for a million years.

The site needs to be deep – hundreds of meters underground. Only certain types of rock will do: Crystalline granite, rock salt or clay rock. It must be geologically stable with no risks of earthquakes or signs of underground rivers.

The process is likely to be fraught, complex and breathtakingly long – potentially lasting more than 100 years. "
Why the unnecessary aggression (with "dumb" and "retards")? People use twitter for fun, maybe they don't want to struggle with complex UX when they have a perfectly valid alternative (Twitter) already.

Instead this should make you wonder - if smart and technical people (like NH visitors) have problems with Mastodon UI, what chance do "normal" non-technical people have? Toxic attitudes like yours are a problem in many tech-heavy communities.

Unless you want a walled-garden experience for hardcode tech people only. That's fine too. That's how IRC is nowadays and it's OK. Just be honest about this and don't call people outside of that bubble "retards".
I want to know the ratio of leaves in a country with such a powerful tea/chai culture. In my country it is hard to find where to buy some tea and is impossible to buy a cup of robust tea with no paper bags.
India’s Population Surpasses China’s, Shifting the World’s ‘Center of Gravity’
The incessant commercialization is a limiting factor as well. Getting rid of uniform logos and going back to the days where all the competitors were naked and covered in oil would certainly boost interest.
Thanks for sharing these tools. Do you have any blogs or open access journals sharing this notation? It seems very simple, I'd love to use it
The article is basically about professional baseball, which by definition is a business. I don’t think non-professional leagues have this problem.
Good point, I'd forgotten Some and None are indeed needed to de-sugar for. Do you know of anywhere else the actual language guts need them ?
> All iterated games in the real world have a first game as well

They effectively don't, because the way things work in the real world is that you become known to the competitive scene long before you reach a top level tournament and people will have definitely played against you in some capacity.

If you could somehow become a top pro without interacting with the rest of the scene, then you would most definitely have a massive advantage against other top pros for a little while before they figure out your tendencies.

This is based on my experience and knowledge of real-time games like SC2 and Dota, so it may not be as applicable to Chess since the action space is considerably smaller and I don't know if knowledge of opponent tendencies is as important (I assume it is though).

I wouldn't necessarily agree all of this means it wasn't a game of perfect information, but the first match of an iterated game in the real world is almost always either inconsequential or you have access to information from a secondary source.
The latter:

An entity violates this prohibition when any of the following OCCURS within the territorial jurisdiction of Montana:
(a) the operation of tiktok by the company or users; OR
(b) the option to download the tiktok mobile application by a mobile application store.
It's my understanding that Microsoft themselves somewhat quickly dropped off from promoting it that much. So from their perspective it was probably considered a mistake to anoint it as an official first-class .NET language, due to the resource allocation entailed to keep that status going.
In the end you're getting full fledged binary which can run anything on your system.

Also I'm not sure if sandboxing on Windows even exists.
My client (tut) has option of disabling boosts, I like my timeline like that.
You keep making these very negative posts, where you sound very confident, but resort to either word salad or making things up.

> not fucking up your data, modeling your tables correctly, and a SQL query

And getting a pony.

> Of the 10% that can't be solved that way, 90% are solved with data cleaning + a linear model.

87% of statistics are made up.

> Of the 1% that can't be solved either way, 90% are solved with other statistical techniques (timeseries modeling, decision trees and so on).

But why?

This reminds me of how some people in the early '80s sneered at people who did their calculations using computers - recommending instead to memorise a billion mathematical shortcuts that would take longer to learn than programming a computer.
So if they have to subsidise your favourite platform, which apparently even Apple does not care about, or else they aren't "supporting" the platform, is that right?
The method that works most reliably that no one talks about is to pinch your nose closed and try to inhale through it. If you’re dreaming, you can still inhale through a pinched nose. Always a useful check to perform before hurling yourself off a cliff to see what it feels like.
Having traveled a lot of the world the US does a good job of separation of church and state, even though it's not something specifically enumerated. I believe your core point of contention is not state and religion but religious people who participate in the democratic process.

These two things are drastically different. I challenge you to go to a country where religious ideology is part and parcel of their system of government. Explore that for a while and see what it's really like when the state endorses a religion and then come back to the United States. Nowhere on any government issued ID card is anyone required to list the religion. Even if you were agnostic or wanted to be atheist in some countries you're still required to list an actual religion. Show me where in the United States there is a state sanctioned religious police force ensuring that doctrine is followed. I've not seen it anywhere. I've seen individual bad actors do things and held to account for them.

There is a big difference between the state picking an ideology or a religion and then mandating that religion or ideology enforcement powers and individuals who are religious participating in the democratic process to ensure that laws align with their value system. The first option the people have no choice in the matter. The second option the laws themselves are not a religious doctrine they are laws based on the societal principles that the people voted for and there is a review process to ensure those laws do not violate the rights of the people.

People who are religious do have the ability to participate in the democratic process and get to vote and make proposals about things that align with their value system. Just like people who are not religious get to do the exact same thing. It is very important not conflate things.
That's a fair point. The changes they did make are definitely steering the large container ship with very slight course heading adjustments. But the cynic in me says that the audience is not the actual customer, the advertisers are. If they were to fundamentally change the sport in a way that would drive viewership up significantly, those extra advertising monies would easily paper over the loss from disgruntled audience.

The article makes a good point about misalignment here. Teams want to win (winning helps sell merch), but the league wants to sell ads (ads need worthwhile content). If these incentives were better aligned, maybe we'd end up with a less boring game that doesn't end up as background noise.
Only the RPi itself is powered by a solar panel, maybe the CPE too. Keep that in mind.
before gmail and the like people didn't choose a server.
the majority of email addresses people got from the institutions they were affiliated with. their university, their job, their isp.

and when they switched their isp or their job, they also had to switch email addresses.

it wasn't until gmail and other independent email services that people actually got to choose.

the only exception were those people who got their own domain who either set up their own server or used the email service offered by their registrar.

email was already ubiquitous before people even had a choice, and when those choices came available there were only very few because the majority of servers were and still re restriced to the members of the institutions they belong to. so for email paralysis of choice never was a concern
Way to move the goalposts buddy. The post said "without starting steam" so I replied with how you can do that, not how you can run games without the steam client installed at all. That said if you don't like steam just don't use it. I don't see what would be the point in installing steam, buying games using it and then trying to play them with it uninstalled. At that point you would already have paid valve and literally only be hurting yourself.
> Am I really seem like so unintelligent person to accuse me in encouraging of telling lies?

Probably you are intelligent, but your responses make you seem kind of ignorant and tone deaf. If a friend of mine implied my girls weren't suitable to any field of of study based on gender, I would lose a lot of respect for them. It's not 1850 anymore.
I don't have any off the top of my head but you might want to look into social enterprises to find examples.

I maintain a list of social enterprises and related resources [0].

You might also use this [1] query to get all wikidata people of a certain age that have social entrepreneur as an occupation.

Or manually dig around this [2] wikipedia category to find young people.

[0] https://github.com/RayBB/awesome-social-enterprise
[1] https://query.wikidata.org/?query=#SELECT%20%3Fperson%20%3Fp...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Social_entrepreneurs
DCT = Discrete Cosine Transform

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_cosine_transform
I always assumed they were like the Globetrotters: more choreographed entertainment than actual competition. Are they actually playing competitively, or are the rules more like stage directions?
Just feels.jpg
In the early days of email, most people got an email account automatically from their work or school. When it went mainstream in the 1990s, most people got an email automatically from their ISP-and a lot of older people (like my parents age, who are in their early-to-mid 70s) still rely on that for their personal email. Then along came independent free email services such as Yahoo/Hotmail/Gmail, which either started out being owned by famous mega-corporations, or were taken over by them not long after they got started.

Mastodon isn’t really comparable-how many people get a Mastodon account from their work or school? From their ISP? From a major well-known corporation (whether paid or for free)? Unless the answer to any of those questions becomes “yes” (on average, not obscure exceptions)-onboarding Mastodon is going to remain a lot more difficult for the average non-technical person than onboarding email ever was
Tesla has premium/luxury pricing and the clout. I'm not sure if your "average Joe" brand of car can make EVs work in their current state. There's a limit how much someone will pay for a Toyota or a Ford, less so for a Tesla or BMW.
I usually SOIC clip/backup the firmware on Ubiquity and other devices we own, before doing anything like this (more recently). Its usually so much faster and reliable than an RMA in most cases for a simple firmware update fail, especially with the post pandemic supply chain the way its been.

Took awhile to get the approval but when you have a large pile of RMAs sitting for 6mo to a year due to a bad firmware update, for only a standard 1-2 year limited warranty, and they stop responding, and replacements were back-ordered for ages. Well, you do what you have to.
He has T_eeted the granular resolution for reality is pi to the decimal number of places matching the number of Planck voxels in the detectable Universe. Two ASI with that addressing scheme could form a sentence as a unit of thought raising flags along that one dimensional voxel array. Deep ocean scientists have a way of naming new things as they are encountered. Could two ASI impersonate deep ocean scientists in conversation and inject light humor as they adventure? (The one dimensional voxel array may have to be quantum information
Not the guy you asked, but these are often recommended.

https://jalammar.github.io/illustrated-transformer/

https://nlp.seas.harvard.edu/2018/04/03/attention.html
Apparently, the score was:

Chelsea - Ajax 4-4

Happy weekend everybody! :)
We do everything manually, looks like most companies just buy data from each other and often it's not really complete. I had experience running large indexing services so that came in handy. Main costs come from storing large amounts of data, multiple databases etc.
I think GP is making an (obviously incomplete) assumption that with age comes movement up the org chart, away from code, and towards an awareness of other departments and ultimately owning/directing the business worrying about cash flows.
I have ranked a lot of websites, short answer: content.

Basically just follow Google's guidelines and have the content and you can rank in highly competitive areas where there are much larger players.

Wrote a lot here: https://respiroc.com/blogs/software/seo-and-ppc-search-ads

I have even succeeded with "blackhat" stuff like brandjacking, ranking first on other brands ;)
AppImages are still widely used, it's just that the tooling surrounding them sucks.

At the end of the day, they're glorified zip files, not much different to self-extracting .exe files, and you'll have to figure out what libraries your application needs to run on various distros. Some bundlers attempt to do this for you but they're not infallible, so be prepared to test in different VMs.
It's more centralised now after several decades because monopolistic companies saw commercial value in squeezing out the competition. Plenty of technical folk have given up their own servers because the dominant providers ruined the system by blocking their emails.
You described the symptoms of psychopaths, sociopaths and narcissists in a single sentence. Research these personality disorders. It will bring you peace and explain the majority of malfunctions in the world. Specifically look into the sociopath apathy empath triad.
Baseball's optimization problem is that it lends itself too readily for it. I guess the inventors hadn't counted on statistical science to come get them, but the problem is that it's just too break-down-able:

- There's only one team that can score at a time.

- The action is start-stop. You have a clear outcome for every single pitch.

- Success is a funnel. Get guy to next base, then the next, etc. Defense is the opposite.

- Players tend to have one job, whose effectiveness is harder to dispute than most other sports.

- Large number of games, high scores. The law of large numbers drags the results towards the mean.

Compare this to soccer. There's huge interest in using stats to optimize soccer, but it's hard because:

- Attackers are defenders and defenders are attackers. What's Ronaldo's weakness? He doesn't defend well, in contrast to what most modern strikers are required to do.

- You can have the ball a lot or a little, it doesn't mean you will win.

- It's not even obvious who is attacking and who is defending, there's no fixed phases. Gegenpressung for instance, are you really attacking when you have the ball but it's in your own third and the other team's strikers are bothering you?

- Low scores, fewer games. You can optimize, but you can't make the dice fall in your favor without enough rolls.
They did something similar to what you said with cricket and had some successful results. A traditional test cricket match takes place over four innings which can last up to 5 days at which point the game gets abandoned as a draw. In an effort to make the game more exciting and get more viewers they introduced Twenty20 (where each team has a single innings with a maximum of 20 overs each) and T10 (single innings of 10 overs each) which means games are dramatically shortened to less than 3 hours and 90 mins respectively. The result is a lot less tactical play, with batters frequently going for six (equivalent of home run) and a much more exciting match for viewers. I imagine some clever rule tweaks could do the same thing for baseball.