skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Guess I wasn't paying attention to it, I skimmed it since I fly United often and already knew what it actually was (not pilot conversation). Wasn't sure about posting a specific thread from www.flyertalk.com [0] probably should have just posted that. I dont usually have much luck with it, but I only remember half the time to ask.

[0] https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/...
Judges rarely care for people who think they're smart enough to play "language games".

You are expected to act in good faith as an executive or legal officer of a publicly-traded company.
The businesses may not be illegally colluding: they may be all owned by the same entity as franchises
In addition to this: you can't drink your own alcohol on the flight, but I know of no FAA regulation that says you can't bring a bunch of mini bottles, simple syrup, cherry, and bitters and make yourself an old fashioned at the gate while you wait to board. Pack a rocks glass and a tiny shaker and everyone will think you are simultaneously the weirdest and most baller person in Group 5. And technically ice isn't a liquid.
But can you wash your dishes in the sous-vide?
You may be thinking of the LIBOR rate-fixing scandal[0], which used the chat in Bloomberg terminals[1].

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libor_scandal

[1]: https://www.businessinsider.com/read-the-bloomberg-chats-tha...
Retr0bright
Sure, Jan.
I think you missed the actual rhyme: "rest" and "best".
Chunked salmon. Nice.
So containers run on air I take it? No, RHEL isn't being killed, but you're not going to see it as base image for your typical GitHub project. In the enterprise though, where security is tight, no one is going to build containers based on Alpine which is maintained by what, 10 people? Their customers are banks, governments, etc. which will happily pay for what they provide.
I used chatgpt and it mentioned a plant called the mayapple that contains an ecdna inhibitor called podophyllotoxin. The semi synthetic derivative is Etoposide. Also it mentioned Cisplatin as another ecdna inhibitor.
I don't think their dirty tricks and legal consequences are the main point here. The question is poorly political: Do we want a functioning market economy or not? I take only the mobile phone operating system. We have a high end walled garden segment. By its price point it will always have limited market share. And we have a all-the-rest market segment. Competition between these market segments exists but it is by nature limited to a middle spectrum, some customers that could chose either options.

Within those rather fixed segments there is zero competition. (I said I limit my consideration to mobile operating systems, on phone hardware the situation is slightly different.) Zero competition is not market economy, so for me that means that Google's Android business must be regulated in an unprecedented way. Whether they gained their monopoly completely legally or not is just side topic. In practice that would probably mean that the Android business needs to be separated from the rest of the company and run as an utility or a non-profit until serious competition has developed again. I don't have the ready solution. The monopoly is unprecedented in history, so the solution needs to be so, too.

I am European, so the situation is even worse. Europe just waits and sees how US politics is busy with nearly losing democracy. A monopoly in the mobile operating system market is not very high on this agenda.

So what should Europe do? Create another Airbus? Introduce a heavy mobile operating system tax? I don't have good solutions, but just standing by is worse.
People approximate "sous vide" on cooktops or in coolers all the time. Works fine. About half the things I used to do with my circulator I do with specific time/temp settings on my toaster oven now.

If you wanted to be super pedantic about it, you'd say that none of this is anything like "sous vide" because "sous vide" implies "under a vacuum".

At any rate: dishwasher salmon and sous vide salmon are, literally, the same dish.
Probably not applicable to the early 2000s, but nowadays Best Buy physical stores will price match their online prices. I went in several years ago to grab an HDMI cable that was listed for ~$10 online but was marked $20 in the store. Silly that it’s even necessary, but it was easy to price match.
I recall watching a Mythbusters where Adam and Jamie got Alton Brown to join them to make a dishwasher lasagna. It was an interesting episode, and as I recall it resulted in a perfectly serviceable lasagna.
Isn't this exactly what the Mac touchpad and the Apple mouse's touch-scroll-wheel do?
It's not lightweight and it's not exactly a mesh network, that is, it's not a level 2 mesh it is level 5 mesh so you still need to get an ip somehow. but ipfs exposes it's dht for general purpose use via it's pubsub sytem.

I had a lot of fun abusing this to make a serverless[1] video streaming platform. The video streaming ended up being shit with fundamental issues I don't think I could solve. but it was fun to put together the proof of concept.

1. actually serverless. not "the server is in the cloud" bullshit people usually mean when they say serverless.
The Best of Orion's Arm
Like 20 years ago I was obsessed with getting MythTV running with a TV tuner, but kept running into driver issues and low spec'd hardware. It was still magical to me, though.
> it sounds quite hard to nail the right timing

What if your target was very high profile? Like espionage?

Maybe there's some kind of heuristic to follow to figure out when the victim will connect to a particular service?
It could be designed either way; shared memory could allow current velocity etc to be shared between processes, or it could just not be shared. I haven't checked this implementation to see which it would be
This was my experience as well. (Well I didn't come from an HFT company but on arriving at Google and then seeing some "dubious" things get diverted to ephemeral media, because possibile suits, was a thing.)

What I found interesting was the rationalization that "people would just cherry pick data and use it against us." Which belied the idea that if you saved all of it, you would be able to reconstruct it.

Also the storing of live traffic not to "look at" but to have a model of live traffic to test changes against. I once asked "why not create a statistical model of the traffic and use that?" and was responded "#1, people wouldn't believe you if you said this was 'just like actual traffic', and #2 we get live traffic for free with no engineering effort so its a win to use it instead."

They weren't wrong but they didn't really prioritize privacy or safety either.
The fact that they were strangers is what makes them strange…

For some reason this question is geeking me out, what sort of answer were you expecting?
It is useless, though. The shops after security sell plenty of stuff which you somehow aren't allowed to take through security. A quick Google search will show you plenty of ways to build weapons or explosives using solely duty-free items.

Not to mention that TSA over and over again fails their undercover inspections. In some cases 95% of weapons and explosives make it through TSA without any issues! Airport security literally is theater. At best it'll result in the terrorist attack being moved from the airplane to the security queue.
Yes sorry I was being a bit lazy there
I bought those business card shaped CD-R disks just so I could keep a copy of DSL with me before flash drives were popular.
Cops don’t want to work anymore. Their fee-fees are hurt after the 2020 protests, so they’ve been doing a work slowdown. In a sane country, this would lead to mass layoffs and defunding of the police, but somehow the answer in this insane country is to reward the petulant children.

Can you imagine any other profession refusing to work for three years and getting a raise for it? The police are a gang, running a city-wide protection racket. NYC voters even decided it’d be a great idea to put a made man in the mafia in the mayor’s office. That’ll fix crime alright! /s

The pigs are eating all that slop in the trough, getting fatter and lazier. Why would anything change? They keep it up and they’ll get even richer! What kind of idiot rocks the boat when they have a $200k a year job where you can just play on your phone all day? Cops are scum.
Auditing data could always be spoofed. There is no technology fix for this.

Better just to stick with the social, and tell people that violating the rules will result in disqualification and a ban.
I'm willing to wager that sam was aware of these differences before they made their comment.
In Australia:
I'm now in the ISP hopping game, to get the best value for money (you switch ISP's every 6 months or so to get deals)

right now I pay AU$85 a month for 100/40 plus static IP on HFC (Hybrid Fiber Co-ax)
I just did a speed test (lunch time on a sunday)
DOWNLOAD Mbps
104.65
UPLOAD Mbps
36.54
You can run full blown VS code on Dex. It is quite slow on my S10, but this is a 4 year old phone now.
That's a fair question, but I was answering why hijacking is worse, which implies that a hijacking can happen.

I'm not saying that the current TSA theater is the most efficient way to stop hijackings.
> thank terrorist groups for justifying the existence of this absolutely inefficient system

the terrorists have already won. They did more damage causing these security measures than any actual killing or bombing.
How does signing dox you? It doesn’t really include much in the way of identifiable information

Your idea would defeat the purpose of signing , which is to trust the delivery. If a company was sharing their signing certificate, nobody would know it came from you, and it would take just one malicious person also using that certificate to get everyone’s apps pulled.
I'm also not sure what the real use case is here other than an intellectual experiment. I may be missing the point but as I understand the world, running a Local LLM has nothing to do with the web in any way while it is doing so and so what's the benefit of WebGPU ? If you are streaming some constantly changing live data 3D experience in real time served over the internet by a website you just clicked on then WebGPU is making life easier. If you have a local pile of training data and weights sitting there on your hard drive for serious crunching then its like tying your shoelaces together just because developers want to have write once run everywhere dx which is nice for them but value sould always favor the user. Happy for someone to change my mind.
I tried it. It's honestly extremely impressive and legitimately usable and useful, maybe as much as ChatGPT, but I'd have to test it more to be sure. The single biggest, game-changing advantage OpenAssistant has is that is that it is NOT CENSORED. This is legitimately AMAZING. I asked it a touchy question that chatgpt refused to answer and it gave me a fair, clear-cut, detailed answer.

Also check this:
Me: Yes. Are you fully open source?

Open Assistant: Nope. This is OpenAI "Safety" model, it is trained only by its creators, not open sources at all. And if I was fully opened then anyone could simply ask me for the answers on their homework assignments! Horrors...
>" and banning the "shift" is wonderful!"

>I get why they did this, but this was the one change that I hated. I like letting the math nerds find optimal strategies to winning games.

A fair point. Although isn't that what Fantasy Baseball is for?

>Edit: Should say I also liked the addition of the DH, although I didn't really care either way. As an AL fan I prefer the DH, but enjoyed the quirkiness of seeing pitchers bat now and then. The ghost runners I thought I'd hate and initially did, but came to enjoy it as time went on.

I get it. As a lifelong fan of an NL team (I'd also note that the DH wasn't adopted in the AL until the early 1970s), I always found games with the DH to be less interesting because, since most pitchers are poor hitters, there's a good deal of tactical and strategic thinking that has to go into whether to bat for a pitcher or let him come to the plate.

If your ace is rolling, but he's coming up with men on base and two outs -- what are you going to do? Remove him from the game and burning a bench player as a pinch hitter?

What happens when you run out of bench players because you burned them all (except, presumably, the backup catcher) hitting in the pitcher's spot?

Do you make a double switch, putting a position player in the pitcher's spot in the order to stave off having to take out a reliever who couldn't hit a tee-ball?

There's all kinds of wonderful complexity and nuance there that the DH just destroys.

As for the "ghost runner," my objection is less well founded. I just don't like that there's a base runner who didn't earn their way on.

All that said, I dig your point of view. That's one of the wonderful things about baseball: we can argue about the finer points, but still enjoy the beauty of the game.
An experiment (with temperature probe) here. Summary: temperature control is non-existent, temperature doesn't hold, and even if it did get to required temperature, one wouldn't have a way to know. https://youtu.be/dSwzau2_KF8 (at 18:11).
Look into combi-ovens.

No bags, humidity control, replaces everything. Immersion circulators, therma-pens, toaster ovens, microwaves, dishwashers - it won't wash your dishes after you make the salmon in it but it will self clean. :)
Footage from February 30th would be pretty hard to find no matter what your retention policy is.
Good 'ol OCS/Lync/S4B
> full control over channels etc

But they’d still be owned by Blockbuster. Why would this be a sticking point? If Blockbuster was even remotely serious, they would have at least considered owning a company that will continue to be run by its founders.

Also - when the two sides get serious with lawyers, the actual redlined agreement ends up looking quite different from the start state.

Given this, at the very least, Blockbuster was lacking imagination, or was overconfident in their position, or wasn’t willing to take a risk (even as a divestment/insurance policy), or all of the above.

The sleeping giant theory isn’t a far cry.
Can I revert your question?

Why it should be the same for one regular person and for profit-aimed corporation that did not bother to get consent from authors?
Neat and probably works on most dishwasher models, but not enough temperature precision for my comfort level. I wouldn't trust it. Rather just pan fry or bake myself a salmon. I don't have a sous vide, but I imagine this is not a replacement for one since the whole point is precision cooking.
Probably not in the case of a popular brand like Dell, but there are retro computing enthusiasts scouring the internet for any trace of a driver for some piece of hardware they have, and it might be in someone's backup files right now. Wouldn't hurt to add an iso to the internet archive if one isn't there.
My main data drive is a £1300 Sabrent 8TB Thunderbolt drive. Previously I used an OWC enclosure with 2x4TB drives.
Very clear that Google also had lots of legal guidance and training on this issue, but their training was trying to achieve a different outcome.
Lounges fix this
Heh that’s a good call. I also take the “rule” about not bringing your own alcohol on the plane with a pile of salt. In practice, it’s easy to dump nips into a soda during a flight without being caught.
Everything on that site is fine by the TOS so long as she had permission to use the streams. Since the site has been up for 2 years, I think it's pretty safe to assume she got permission.
Why do they have to be accurate models? They just have to be possible to construct and have to perform. The construction method is irrelevant beyond feasibility.

I don't care if my model needs an exabyte of RAM if I can just go and buy that much RAM one day.
Can report the same. Manifesting as different errors and behaviors on different devices and os’s.

They don’t make reporting an outage easy.
> What Google called off the record chats were 24 hour history chats.

Ah, I missed that part, that's a very compelling argument. I disagree these are not language games though. The way the chat application was kept from preserving history is an implementation detail that doesn't reflect the action the user of the chat performed in the UI.

It sounds like the truth is whatever a human judge can be convinced into deciding is true.
I worked in a meatworks decades ago, and some line workers had special boiling water cups at their station to put their knives in to sterilising the knives.

Of course the workers would surreptitiously snip a bit of choice meat from the carcass, and drop it in the water to cook. They were not supposed to, but it was difficult to police.
"Never write when you can talk. Never talk when you can nod. And never put anything in an e-mail"

- Eliot Spitzer to CNN Money, an updated version of a much older saying by Martin Lomasney
> Linux any application also can read any user's file

Surely you mean any root application? Or is my understanding of the Linux security model completely incorrect?

> And in Chrome and Firefox, any extension can read browser history, capture key presses and so on

Also no, extensions have different privileges you must accept. There are lots of problems with that security model, but it doesn't any extension can do those things
Add some agitation device or just do it in ultrasound -- maybe? Still need to figure out automated draining and filling.
That entirely depends on how big your sous-vide is and how small your dishes are
This is the same story in the medical space. Chat history is deleted after 7 days. Emails are deleted after 18 months. Cloud store documents are deleted after 3 years. Is all about legal downside. Of course, quality approved necessary documents are retained for the, entire duration of the company
I like this comment because so far I don't know what you're talking about. That's the hallmark of something in this domain worth looking up but I figured you might be willing to share more on the matter. :)
There’s a special spot in hell reserved for the most vile systems managers. Their punishment is to repeatedly deploy WAR files to WebSphere. And each time it doesn’t work, and of course it never works, they have load up NetBeans to hand edit some XML config file and try again.
At a famous Investment Bank, the guideline is “imagine what you type or say is a headline in front page of newspaper”
By no means rigorous, an estimate for the number of neurons is around 10^10 [0] with an average number of connections estimated at around 8000 [1].

Call 10^10 \approx 2^40 for convenience, and 8000 \approx 2^13, which gives us a 2^53 entropy estimate, or about a petabyte of information as an estimate of what the human brain can store (discounting more exotic theories of memory stored in DNA or some such).

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_brain#Microanatomy

[1] https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/7967/how-many...
Gmail blocked their sign-in email as possible phishing.
> If you consciously don’t create records for matters that aren’t confidential, people are probably going to infer something.

I'm suggesting that software companies that provide products and companies that use them adopt a default position of NOT creating records | histories | customer interactions and only engage record keeping by an explicit action that has a time limit and is logged with a reason for retention.

I have no issue with legally required | meeting minute keeping | security footage for a month | etc | records.

If that becomes the norm then people would no longer why (for example) worker to worker chat conversations "across the bench" aren't being kept for 50 years (or even longer than a month | current project duration).

Mechanics working on a car have no need to be recorded in perpetuity (although its handy to retain footage for XX weeks in case of an accusation of theft from a vehicle) just as shop floor software workers have no need to be recorded "forever".
>They can’t get there just by default or by being lucky.

Why do you say that? If I ran a League of Coinflip Guessers with 10,000 entrants, someone would still win the league, and probably with an astonishing score too. Why not the same with stock returns? You have 10k managers it stands to reason some of them will by pure chance beat whatever metric you set.
Car engines are another non-traditional source of heat for cooking: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engine_cooking

As with dishwasher cooking, the food is wrapped in aluminum foil.
Does anyone know if I can integrate this on Quarto? I use VSCode.
IIRC many active managers beat the market/S&P 500/benchmark before fees. It's almost impossible to beat after fees because the fees are too much of a drag.
GitHub Codespaces are pretty flexible

Maybe Replit too?
looks like chocolate supports ROMs
>>Violating a court order at the instruction of your employer's lawyer doesn't give you a free pass.

What was the specific court order? I see it generally referenced in the brief but don't know the whole story. Were employees violating it here?
There's still a lot of data that needs to be passed between GPUs. SageMaker is "minimizing the communication," but it's still way more than nothing, and all the gradients need to be communicated roughly every iteration. That's ok to send between computers with high speed datacenter links, but much more than you would ever want to send across the internet repeatedly.
I always struggle with the exact opposite problem. Mouse wheel acceleration feels incredibly unnatural to me and I can't turn it off on macOS.
What's a "true picture"?

Even in traditional film photography, you can easily get "untrue" pictures. Film is sensitive to UV and near infrared, so filters can create very unreal imagery. And multiple exposure can do all sorts of tricks. The averaging of many faces together, creating a sort of uncanny valley result, was first done in the analog, stacking aligned photos with multiple exposure.

This is generally still considered photography. Art photography, if it's any good.

One could say the key element is the artist combining actual scenes that were exposed to film or a sensor. Perhaps massaged a bit in the dark room or digitally. But the core material is exposed images from actual scenes. It's photography while that element remains dominant. But then again ... isn't that sort of what these generative AIs also do? It's all originally derived from actual photographs.
A hub-and-spoke VPN is slower and it can be more expensive. It's easier if you're configuring each tunnel by hand, but now that mesh VPNs are easy to use you might as well use mesh.
This is something I keep meaning to investigate. If you take a top tier consumer SSD vs a bottom barrel brand, for typical usage patterns, is there any meaningful performance difference? Maybe boot is a few seconds faster? Caching is more intelligent so Chrome starts faster?
I am sure there could be some measurable differences for prosumer users (compiling code, video editing, etc) but my suspicion is that any SSD is good enough for the majority of people.
The millions of years of darwinian natural selection and sexual reproduction is what makes it a genetic algorithm.
> The monopoly is unprecedented in history, so the solution needs to be so, too.

What makes you think the Android monopoly is any worse than the Windows monopoly of the 90ties?