skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The technique a few people mentioned of looking at words or writing and then looking away and looking back is pretty effective for me. You would have to have some reason to suspect you were dreaming first.

I can do it, I first figured it out when I was 6 or 7, but why? Might be better to just get some sleep.
No, why? The restaurant isn’t airside.
The toilet can mean the bathroom, at least where I'm from.
Yes. It's called "acceptable losses".[1]

The idea that only deaths matter is part of this narrative.

[1] https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2022-04-01/covid-accep...
It's because the sandwiches are made in a central location and distributed. You're paying for the convenience of not having a sandwich made at point of sale.
does that disallow criticism of the style of a comment?
Sounds like a bunch of bollocks. They clearly charge whatever the market will bear, which given captive audience is a lot.
Consumer Surplus and Surplus Value have their similarities. Flaming someone for using some words that appear to trigger you is unproductive. Maybe give them the benefit of the doubt, especially since their last sentence seems to argue for capitalism.

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_surplus#Consumer_surplus

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Surplus_value

Perhaps review: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
To clarify, the OP is pointing out that it wasn't Newton's law of universal gravitation that defeated the epicyclical model of the cosmos.

It was Kepler's laws of planetary motion that did for epicycles; and that happened 70 ish years before Newton stated his laws of motion and pointed out that they basically subsume Kepler's laws of planetary motion.
Why do you think having access to the machine would help against computer vision and input emulators?
And ive been shadow banned.

Way to go HN, if people know this little about security than this place has become a complete cargo cult. Enjoy your false idols.
Good projects need to be known. As a developer, you still come across new tools that you wish you knew earlier.
Plan 9 System Calls

"All of 'em (excluding obsolete ones)."

http://aiju.de/plan_9/plan9-syscalls
Yep. I hate everything about flying. It’s miserable. I plan my vacations to avoid flying, it’s just not worth the aggravation for me.
Okay, so the problem is just the legal construct they're using? I guess I can see that, what should they use instead?
The second and third generations came out after the iPod Touch that had a full App Store.
A few other examples for the sections given:

Runtime behaviour determination: the stdlib [dataclasses](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#module-da...)

Dataclasses is notable because it's the only example (I'm aware of) of type hints effecting runtime behavior as part of the stdlib.

Compiler instructions: mypyc was (one of?) the first to do this, but Cython actually supports this natively now, and is much more active than mypyc is last I checked.
> It loads classes lazily, so your program can start up at `main` very fast, and you only pay for what you use

Right, but large Java programs use huge numbers of classes. They may load thousands of classes just during start-up.

> the byte code format is very compact and can be parsed in a single pass, so I don’t think it would be significantly slower than ordinary machine code loading

That's what I was wondering about. There used to be a flag in OpenJDK to disable bytecode verification to improve start performance, but it was deprecated in JDK 13 [0] and I think it's since been removed entirely. Its removal is understandable but I still wonder about the performance impact.

[0] https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/javase/13-relnote-i...
how apropos: it's the 50th anniversary of A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973)
TFA counted only normal numbers and zero.

The commenters counted also subnormals.
“Decades of anti-nuclear protests in Germany, stoked by disasters at Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima, put pressure on successive governments to end the use of a technology that critics argue is unsafe and unsustainable.

Environmental groups planned to mark the day with celebrations outside the three reactors and rallies in major cities, including Berlin.”

It’s crazy that a country made up of seemingly smart people favor this. How did Germany evolve to be so anti-nuclear? Given the alternatives nuclear seems the way to go.
It works in the sense that some people feel better about paying higher taxes if they pay them by paying higher prices to corporations that then pay the tax.

And other people feel better about raising taxes on people if they do so by raising taxes on corporations that then raise prices on people.
Depends on the country as well, some country airports with high item tax make it worth buying at the airport.

Take the vice tax for example, most Islamic countries probably at alcohol cheaper at their airports.

Same goes with countries that have items with pricing power, I always get certain gifts at Japanese airports since the price it usually cheaper with tax free comparative to the rest of the country.

US airports though... Never worth it. Overpriced af
There are people who ultimately liberate works and ensure that they are forever preserved, regardless of the wishes of the copyright holders (some of which would like to think that they have the moral right to withhold copyrighted works from public access).

Unfortunately, those people are labeled "pirates" and demonized by the proponents of lengthy IP protection. The fact of the matter is, regardless of an individual "pirate's" motivations, piracy is preservation. The most widely preserved libraries of media and software are the ones that are the most widely pirated.
I get the feeling that the OP is using "loss function" in the figurative sense, and not in the sense of an actual loss function that is fit to observations. We know nobody did that in Newton's time. In Newton's time they didn't even have the least squares method, let alone fit a model to observations by optimising a loss function.
This is actually the best selling point for me. With Sourcegraph joining the party, not supporting Vim is definitely minus points. And rightfully so.
Do you have any evidence that this is GPT-3.5 level, or are you just repeating what they said? We have an abundance of claimed capabilities already; that's not what's lacking.
Yeah, I am not used to seeing the term “cloud” for a single electron.

Is that a common term in physics for a single electron? I am very much used to seeing that phrase as the probability space for electrons in orbitals in an atom.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital

In this article I take it to mean “any point particle has a non-zero physical radius, but because quantum mechanics shows everything has a measure of uncertainty, the possibility of the charge within that non-zero space is an amorphous cloud”. But still a weird lexical overlap with the high school physics electron cloud meaning of things.
The definition of SaaS is basically where the buyer is not the user. The managers write multi year six and seven figure checks not the user.
Seems to have the same limitations as ChatGPT 3.5. It stops in the middle of generating content. Hope that this is only for the online chat demo.
I think you're probably missing that it's not the ideas of your posts that is attracting negative attention, but your tone.
Toilets are what Brits call the room that America's call a bathroom. I guess at least that has the virtue of the room actually having toilets in it and not baths.
broadcasts here https://www.liveatc.net/feedindex.php

but I guess you want the music, don't you? (me, too)
Your answer applies equally to GPU and CPU, no?

The comment to which you replied was asking about the need for a GPU, not the need for a lot of RAM.
There is a huge benefit to being the reserve currency: you can issue way more debt than you would otherwise be able to. That’s a massive advantage. Unfortunately, in the US, we use that advantage to cut taxes for the rich rather than invest back into our society.
You don't want a bunch of different car API system, you'd have to deal with so many issues like large (ongoing) investment and support from Apple and Google. Maybe you could get support for some things like AC control via Matter but car manufacturers would struggle to get proprietary features supported.

You just need car specific app icons to appear inside of the Apple and Google UIs. Since Cars reach EOL you don't want infotainment system to have to depend on iOS or Android SDKs/APIs since those will change and the cars will stop getting updates. You want a very loose coupling between the car and the mobile device.

To me that means progressive web apps (PWA). All it needs is some type of registry/discovery mechanism (that isn't Cloud based). You make the connection between your car and mobile device, the local app registry is scanned and the PWAs are installed.
When you say "it's possible", do you mean "it's possible in the real world" or do you mean "it's possible if you can disregard the voters and and all that"?
I saw this joke somewhere else bud, your obligatory hn conspiracy paranoia is showing
I believe you when you say there is a lack of competition, but it seems like the system is set up to prevent that from being consequential: as I understand it, the price should be set as a function of the prices of competitors outside the airport, per the Port Authority's own pricing rules.

So, lack of competition inside the airport would not by itself be able to explain this pricing.

Corruption or incompetence within the Port Authority would explain it, and though I will withhold judgment, it's hard to think of what else it might be. It's even easier to jump to that conclusion when they also deny and conceal when asked for an explanation.
The matter particle already existed we annihilated it with an antiparticle, that released m(cc) energy from which 50% of it was released as energy (the matter part) and 50% created the anti-particle that came into existence when we created it.

From out point of view it all makes sense:

Create anti-particle

Smash it into equivalent particle

Energy released

???

Profit

From the anti-patter point of view:

Profit

???

Energy coalesced into antiparticle

Particle unsmashes

Particle stops existing.

I’m mr meseeks look at me!
What is taught in school and what people learn are often vastly different, in any culture.

In Shenzhen every single person seemed to be running a business, and it felt like one of the most truly capitalist places I have ever been. In New Zealand people are dependent on their government, and few people try to run their own business. You don’t need to risk much in New Zealand, so most people don’t.
I have a 2015 iMac too and it runs fine with opencore legacy patcher on Ventura. I don’t complain that Apple did drip support for this machine in their newest os, but I complain that so much of their software comes only with the latest os. I had to update because otherwise I wouldn’t be able to use my HomeKit setup and the shared photo library on this device.
> The fact that simply patching the O.S. can be enough to make it work on older hardware is a testament on how Apple could make it work on it too, if they wanted, and without much effort.

Don't fall for it. It's the same OS whether it has a cute new name or not. The only reasons to upgrade are a desire to use specific new features, to fix bugs that specifically affect you, patching pressing security issues that specifically affect you, and/or lack of restraint. For 99.9% of users, it is the last reason and only that reason. The real reason behind Apple's fast and furious upgrade schedule is to attract developers, i.e. to break software so that users will be forced to purchase the same software again and again.
To quote John Oliver: "What can you do?" "Something. You can do, something."

The possible ways to respond to that process are open ended and infinite. You can do anything you want about it. Doing nothing about it is approximately the least defensible.
Of course, as the current top comment mentions: because most people don’t want to make programs. Computing in the 80s was limited to nerds, business users and a school kids. All of these groups have some incentive or drive to write programs, above that of the average person from the population.

Anyway, this is not an excuse for the state of operating systems today, which dissuade people towards programming. Yes, I even mean Unix-like operating systems. Why? Simply because the mental gap between ‘programs as we use them’ and ‘programs as we write them’ is so large on a modern OS. Consumers are stuck essentially playing in the sandpit and don’t really learn anything about computing while they use the computer. Unless of course they have some weird drive that helps them weather the pain of going against the tide and actually learning what’s going on in their computer.

There is very little you can learn from an application (such as Firefox, telegram etc.) because they offer zero introspection and are completely alien things compared to how they are conjured.

Think of the Apple II, there was very little gap between using the ‘OS’, making a program and using a program. They were nearly the same thing, or felt the same.

How would you interact with the computer? Enter some text. How did you make a program? Enter some text and save it. How did you run and interact with the program? …

Alan Kay talks about this a lot. If you imagine Smalltalk (now Squeak) as an OS, the gap between programming and using programs is tiny, so you learn by consuming and thus the leap to proficiency isn’t so big.

Another great counter-example is emacs. It offers introspection info everything and lets you modify a lot of its behaviour in a uniform way. I thing this is why people like it so much. You learn it as you use it and you’re encouraged to modify it. It’s a far cry from how most software is made today.
Because you cannot be productive in that way on a smartphone alone.

The smartphone is descended from simple communication devices, and adapted into a richer communication environment and a content consumption device.

You need a computer to do anything hacky with a smartphone, so you're more likely to get into the details on a computer in the first place. Smartphones are mostly useful for consumption of media, an activity that isn't really condusive to tinkering and modifying.
Keepass + rclone to synchronize to Google Drive.
>Both teams on both sides wanted this to come together

>It takes apple to make a move for us to break through communication issues and get anything done

Imagine paying millions of dollars for "the best" developers, designers, managers, yet they can't even communicate with each other properly to align with common interests. FAANG culture is becoming so slow and ineffective that I'm not surprised they are cutting tens of thousands of employees.

Where I'm from we have an expression - "many grandmas, lazy/spoiled child" - and it's especially rings true in creative work.

For something truly brilliant to be created, you need someone with a vision and freedom to implement it. It's extremely rare for something brilliant to come from committee or top-down designed by managers delegating work to a bunch of teams.
It's one of the reasons even open-source struggles with design - you need one or a tiny team of aligned brilliant people to work together, and you need to give them freedom to do it. Not constrain them with meetings, micromanaging the product and letting everyone express their opinion. That's how you get a terrible, bland, uninspiring design.

Recently I had a chance to work at a theatre production that ended up suffering from the same issue - the director had no vision but only an idea, so he delegated
different work to everyone, then micromanaged people and intersected into every attempt at collaboration with his own opinions and ideas. As new people were coming in, their ideas were added into the mix, creating a show that ended up being even worse than mediocre.
I think the community servers solution wouldn't have scaled up to current markets. Back in the day with smaller userbases you'd have less casual players, more people who would be interested in administrating a server and willing to work for free. Now that gaming is mainstream and everyone does it, not everyone cares as much as people used to back then.

Counter-Strike itself still has community servers as an option. And given the choice between those servers and regular matchmaking, most players prefer the latter. This map hasn't updated in 4 years, but I doubt that has changed: https://teamwork.tf/worldmap/csgo/live
> something very strange about people writing bullet points, having ChatGPT expand it to a polite email, sending it, and the sender using ChatGPT to condense it into the key bullet points

This doesn’t suggest he’s reading your chats. We don’t even know if people actually use ChatGPT like this or he just thinks they do

Expect anything you say to GPT to be collected and used by OpenAI, and keep in mind that it could be read alongside your email address by OpenAI employees or government officials who request the data. But we don’t have evidence the latter is happening, and there are so many chats it’s most likely nobody notices or cares about what you’re saying.
Eli Zabar's EAT; for when Whole Foods' prices are too low
To be fair, there is quite a bit of survivorship bias at work - how many stories, poems and plays have been written over the past 500 years that never made it into print and disappeared forever within a few years of being written? Until the 19th century, putting things into print was very labor-intensive (and was still quite labor-intensive until the late 19th), so anything that has survived was compelling to at least the person who paid to have it printed.

Now that putting creative works out into the world is cheap and easy, yes, the vast majority of the dross will be forgotten almost immediately after it’s uploaded, but a few gems will remain the be passed around for decades or longer.
Most important any audit should state methodology and assumptions and report findings based on this.

My big problem with KeepassXC is that the threat model is not well documented. It does a lot of fuzz around memory randomisation but it might be much easier to extract the secret key of the browser extension when unlocked. So I guess it mostly provides security for data at rest, but afaik this is not documented. A general security audit is IMHO difficult if nobody states any guarantees.
I'd argue it has slowly gotten worse at Microsoft, and that's pretty bad.

I login to windows and everything feels like they're coding / designing AT ME. It's like nobody making decisions is thinking about me accomplishing anything, more how they can make me do whatever it is they want.

Don't get me started with the dozen (ok maybe not exactly a dozen) or so design languages inside Windows and how unfriendly some are.
But that's all the more evidence of cognition in the absence of physicality. Phantom pain is a result of signals leaking from adjacent areas of the brain to the ones which once handled senses originating from that region of the body. And you sure enough feel something, because you don't feel with your fingers. You feel, and indeed experience every other sense, only in your brain.
This class of exploit is interesting, but it's totally overshadowed by the fact that every Google engineer is probably downloading dozens of public packages per day, any of which could be compromised at any time. Plus those attacks are even better because you don't need guess what the original package did to avoid detection.
Lower interest rates to 0% and faking it will come roaring back.
I don't understand how you can possibly say this with a straight face.
> the photo is a medium of expression which is not that different from writing something.

Yes, of course photography is an expression for the reasons you mention. When I see a documentary photograph, I know it's not the "whole picture" but just a moment lasting 1/200s and maybe 1 out of 500 photos that a photographer picked out. But I do assume that the moment I'm seeing did actually exist from that perspective, and that there are real limits to how the photographer can control the image. That claim to reality is all that documentary photography has to elevate it from artistic and illustrative photography.

Here's an example (from the NFT AI Cuban project) of what gets lost when we treat realistic AI-generations on the same epistemic level of a traditional documentary photo

https://twitter.com/SaabGT750/status/1643651637033017345

Knowing that this photo is AI generated, what are we supposed to make from it? Of course the human pictured doesn't exist, but does this helmet actually exist as part of the Cuban refugee life, or is it purely an artifact of the AI's hallucination? Documentary work has been great at showing how fact is stranger than fiction — e.g. how during in war, people can have moments of laughter and goofiness. Treating AI photos and documentary work on equal footing ultimately erodes our understanding of how expansive and weird reality can be.
I hope that Matrix will be for IM what email has become. The ability to control your own data and use a client of your choice is incredibly valuable. Surely, there are costs and labor associated with running a Matrix homeserver for your organization, but for organizations that can support it, this is truly becoming a viable alternative to Slack.
Yes -- except for limited wireguard support, usability for multicast is mostly solved. SPR services mDNS and Zeroconf/SSDP with a udp proxy[1].

[1] https://github.com/spr-networks/super/blob/main/multicast_ud...
to be fair...

not really, because you'd legally have to return that money anyways. your argument still holds.

a better counterargument would be that some banks don't allow their app to run on rooted phones, which is equivalent to anti-cheat measures (since windows is rooted by default)

to protect against what though?
If you define "winning" flexibly enough...

If you sell oil at a price too low to recoup the investments in the production facilities, but high enough to bring in hard currency at a time when you really need hard currency, is that winning?
We just say our projects are "enhanced/powered/enabled by AI" and no one bats an eye. It's for "regular people" though and using that term gives it shimmers of magic in their eyes "wow it's AI...!" and truth is that while most people have heard of ChatGPT now, they haven't used it. And the majority of people trying Chat, they're using it as a novelty toy.

Yeah it's marketing, but it really makes you stand out (in front of non-devs). However, I do think it's beneficial to say you're "AI-powered" since that'll get you the more right kind of users who like that stuff. It'll probably turn away those who are afraid of touching OpenAI's servers, but that'll save you tons of headaches too, with those customers.
Fastest neural text-to-speech on CPU
Neural text-to-speech that runs 50x faster than real time on a desktop CPU
I'm holding my breath. The first day out I ran into a link problem. Zig linked statically not dynamically as instructed and while the task was produced, it didn't work anyway. That's not gonna be fixed I believe until 0.11.0. now to give credit where due, the head guy (Andrew if I recall) had already found this issue or a good part of it.
Assuming I understand what you're saying here, granted. But that doesn't make lead gold, and it doesn't make the large amount of neural mass in the gut a brain.
Another possibility is the DOJ not intending up take that person to trial, but instead offering to reduce or drop the charges in exchange for testimony.
Mbps :(
organic neurons are much more complex than simulated neurons.

It's more accurate to look at an organic neuron as an entire computing device than a simple transistor.
wooOooo!!
Say "continue" and it will keep going