skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Pengobatan Alami Diabetes
Pengobatan alami diabetes dengan jelly gamat solusi yang tepat untuk penyembuhan penyakit diabetes. Jelly Gamat ini merupakan pengobatan herbal, sehingga aman di konsumsi dan tidak menimbulkan efek samping.
Mengapa Pengobatan Alami Diabetes Dengan Jelly Gamat?

seperti yang kita ketahui sebelumnya, jelly gamat ini terbuat dari ektra teripang pilihan yang di olah secara modern dan telah tebukti secara klinis sembuhkan penyakit diabetes mellitus. Menurut Dr.Ir.M. Ahkam Subroto, M.App.Sc., Periset Bioteknolog LIPI, kandungan protein tinggi pada teripang yang mencapai 82%, baik diberikan kepada penderita diabetes. Protein tinggi berperan meregenerasi sel beta pankreas yang memproduksi insulin. Hasilnya, produksi insulin meningkat. (Trubus 441, Agustus 2006, halaman 109). Dari penelitian juga terbukti bahwa teripang/gamat memiliki kandungan “Cell Growth Factor” (faktor regenerasi sel) sehingga mampu merangsang regenerasi/pemulihan sel dan jaringan tubuh manusia yang telah rusak/sakit bahkan membusuk, sehingga menjadi sehat/pulih kembali. Contoh yang mudah misalnya pada kasus penderita diabetes melitus. Selain diminum, gamat juga dioleskan pada luka yang sudah membusuk, bahkan hampir diamputasi. Ternyata, “Cell Growth Factor” mampu bekerja dengan baik sehingga luka menjadi pulih dengan cepat.
Kandungan kromium teripang juga membantu kinerja insulin untuk menurunkan diabetes. Caranya melalui penyerapan glukosa berlebih dalam darah dan menyedot glukosa masuk jaringan darah lebih cepat. Ini menyebabkan konsumsi teripang mencegah serta memulihkan penyakit diabetes mellitus. Itu sebabnya penyakit gula tinggi Suharmen lenyap dan pembusukan paru-paru terhambat. Gamat kemudian meregenerasi sel paru-paru sehingga penyakitnya pulih, walau membutuhkan waktu 2 tahun. Banyak orang yang telah membuktikan akan khasiat dari pengobatan alami diabetes dengan jelly gamat. Untuk pemesanan silahkan klik cara pemesanan obat jelly gamat
>How this was not made a priority zero, drop-everything-and-fix-this-crap-yesterday internally is beyond my comprehension.

Its simple. Minority concerns like this don't upset enough of their users to impact their bottom line in any meaningful way so they don't do anything about it.
Horribly inaccurate, link-bait-y headline.

FTA> A developing Senate plan that would bolster the government's ability to regulate the computer security of *companies that run critical industries* is drawing strong opposition from businesses that say it goes too far and security experts who believe it should have even more teeth.
Why does that scare you? This is the Internet; people post pictures of their genitals all the time, and the world does not seem substantially harmed by it, because it's usually easy to avoid seeing things you're not interested in, and the back button is easy to press.

In general, I would rather not weigh ourselves down with unnecessary rules.
"Better to go for paid advertising on your website itself."

Usually need a minimum of six months of steady visitors, or growing from a healthy base with no sustained dips, before most paid advertisers will even consider advertising for a reasonable/worthwhile fee.

Starting out AdSense seems to be the best option. Its when AdSense toasts you that the scramble begins and not something I'm looking forward to.

Wondering if I should send reminder email to parents and friends not to click any ads. hahaa
Check out lthread_compute_begin() and lthread_compute_end() functions. It allows you to block inside a coroutine without affecting other coroutines. (example at the end of the page)

I prefer coroutines over IO loops because they result in simpler and cleaner code. And with lthread_compute feature, you get the advantages of real threads + the lightness of coroutines.

https://github.com/halayli/lthread
Personally, I've operated accelerometers and gyros at 200 Hz after some low-pass filtering, which is really all you need for this application. I'm sure there are sensors that operate at even higher frequencies if need be. The GPS module doesn't have to be updated too fast (maybe 10 Hz?) because it only serves to correct for horizontal drift.

I run the 100 Hz flight control loop for my tricopter on an ATmega1280 clocked at 16 MHz. A _lot_ more could be done with something like the Beagleboard, including generating a 3D map of the surroundings if I mounted a Kinect on it.

I want to agree about the decentralized operation because there would be so many wireless signals that could interfere, but those guys seem to be controlling 20 quadrotors without problems. I know XBees can be configured to communicate on different channels, but decentralized operation will most likely require something beefier like wifi (and that, I don't know how to configure to work over so many different channels).
I don't see how it makes much difference. Removing the link from the site means that nobody will discover the photo. People who discovered the photo and saved the link could equally well have saved the file, and in fact I think saving the file is more common.
If you want proof, you will always agree with Dijkstra ;-) Unfortunately, I can't summon an alternative universe where Dijkstra got his way. However, I can say that Dijkstra is rolling over in his grave if he heard you compare testing to his approach. To him, empirical approaches were appropriate for the physical world, where items vary, materials deteriorate, and operating conditions are unpredictable. In the digital world, where systems are vastly more complex but made out of ideal, eternal elements, the proper tool is not empiricism, but mathematics. That is Dijkstra's message: mathematics is the right tool for programming, and we are making a costly error by applying empirical engineering methods instead.

Testing is just another messy empirical approach to a mathematical system. The master would be appalled.
>I always wonder why creating synthetic nanorobots to replace organic ones seems more attractive than learning to control what we already have inside.

Would you like to reuse a result of a process that went on for millions of years and reverse engineer all evolutionary accretions created by a random mutation process ? It's not hard to figure out why developers don't like that option, if they work maintaining a large codebase they probably have hands on expirience with that kind of work. It's not something I would unleash on my brain.
Basically, if profit is your goal, pursue the profitable users.
I see we're done with the constructive portion of this conversation.
It's a hard sentence to word correctly. (For example, your new statement may be taken to imply that sex is obscene/disgusting, which many may not agree with).

Your original intent is clear enough though, so it doesn't matter. While posting in places like these where sentences can be taken apart, one develops a new respect for television personalities and politicians who have to think of how every sentence can be interpreted.
a lot of comments here, including the OP, simply miss the point. I work in the embedded world; I work on embedded electronics for the automotive sector. I write C and C++ code that is multi-threaded and I deal with things such as the CAN and LIN bus and watchdog timers. Just the mere comment that a watchdog "is very low load on the system" is a disturbing comment to me. It's a signal you think that the watchdog need not be very accurate and that you can slip a few milliseconds. Simply not true. When you miss your timing things stop working. Your hardware reboots itself if the watchdog isn't kicked on time, you wind up with bus errors on a vehicle network if you don't send the LIN break signal precisely on time or you're preempted when you've sent the break and now you're breaks are too long. When things like this happen, you effect other hardware. Most of these articles talking about threads, processes, and scheduling of such never seem to account for interfacing with external hardware. Many of it is simply wrong.
Open letter to the Baby Boomers from Generation Y
Someone asked for some Dos and Don'ts here and started a nice list: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3538392
It doesn't seem to relate to this situation at all. I could only make it through about 15 pages due to the author's writing style.

Collusion for these firms was price-based collusion for products, not collusion to suppress the input costs of highly skilled labor. Manufacturers are said to have engaged in establishing minimum or fixed prices for their products.

Consumers will tend to absorb this form of market inefficiency. After the cartel agreements were broken, consumers reaped the benefits in the form of the "intensification of price competition" (lower prices).

It suggests that only in one case was there collusion in R&D, which might be a relevant example.

Additionally, the article cites outside competition from the USA as a factor. Competition from foreign sources on engineer wages such as India is still nascent. US manufacturing during this period was mature and robust.
How to Build a Killer Launch Campaign: 2 of 3 articles in a PR series
As an engineer we are taught to look ahead when designing software and to do it with the "good of society" in mind.

Keep in mind, that when the photo features of Facebook were added, they probably didn't do it while thinking about half a billion users or whatever gazillion terabytes of photos they have to operate with. Heck, they may have even started out with simply storing photos on disk in their servers where deletion was easy as opposed to on a CDN.
Rubber extrusions CA, custom rubber molding, Custom extruded products
Custom rubber molding and rubber extrusions in California since 1967. World-class supplier of rubber extrusions. Request a quote today!rubber extrusions CA, custom rubber molding, Custom extruded products
I doubt that. If the image is being removed, say because it contains an embarrassing picture that was accidentally posted, you can bet someone copied the link and shared it or posted it somewhere. Also, image lookup services like tineye could also grab a hold of them unless they are gone for good.

Don't get me wrong, I still believe that posting ANY picture on Facebook you don't want the whole world to see is just plain stupid.
Honestly, I'm not so sure. Looking at the APIs exposed by Facebook you'd be hard pressed to find anything that looks like its engineered. It seems to be a hodge podge of features thrown together over years with the stuff that works best/well enough sticking around long enough to be seen by the public. I think its a safe bet that many of the things not exposed are quite messy/nonsensical.

They could very well have never thought of deleting a photo; it doesn't seem that there is much interest in information removal there, and I could easily see if being a very ugly manual process that no one wants to spend time doing and as such it never gets done.
Can't be emphasised enough. Those of us who loved Diablo 1 and 2 .... will not be able to show our children Diablo 3, because its mandatory online authentication and everything else will get shut down.
It's true that the papers in the indexes of Google Scholar, Pubmed, and Citeseer are peer reviewed, but what that shows me is that what is really driving the discovery process is the ranking system in those search engines: i.e. the order in which the hundreds of results for a given search query show up.

One of the drawbacks of the existing peer review process is that academics don't get credit for their reviews, nor do the reviews see the light of day for others to benefit from. I expect that there would be significantly more discussion, and reviews, of papers in the future if there was a credit system that allowed people to get credit for reviews and comments they made of papers. I think that credit system is possible and will be built.

There is an interesting question regarding the immutability of content. Right now, once you publish a paper, you can't edit it, or delete it. It's an immutable piece of content. Before the web was established, there was a line of thinking, developed by Ted Nelson, according to which the internet should evolve like that, and that a link should always work: once some content is posted, it can never be taken down. Most people are probably glad that the web developed along the lines of Tim Berners Lee's thinking, rather than Ted Nelson's, and that they are now free to edit and delete content they have posted. I think similarly people would appreciate being able to update a paper in response to a comment they have received. The author is better off, and so are subsequent readers, as they find themselves reading a more evolved and advanced paper.
I cannot stand open layouts for coders. I am very rigid about only working at places that respect coders. That means an ergonomic environment (desk, chair, monitors, et al), with good lighting. It also means either providing a quiet work environment with no visual distractions, or allowing work from home 2-3 days a week.

Small start-up environments are great for this. In my experience, seeing the work environment for coders is an excellent predictor of team happiness, productivity, and ultimately company success.
I've designed a couple of small scale websites before and I've always thought about how they would react if the user base would expand significantly. It's always something in the back of my mind when programming.

Even with a small user base; if a user flags a photo for deletion -- it should get deleted. Period.
The problem with having no limits on what can be posted to Facebook is that you cannot easily avoid it. If someone you friend posts it, it will appear in your news feed. If they have a blog with pictures you don't want to see you just don't visit that blog.
Publishing articles on http://www.ampedasia.com
To maintain the rights guaranteed to everybody in Common Law

http://vinay.howtolivewiki.com/blog/other/taking-a-crack-at-...

has a detailed analysis of why it's necessary and how to implement a subset of those rights.
Are Perceptrons like linear support vector machines, but just without the constraint that the hyperplane has to lie at the maximum margin distance from the points?
More money enables you to consume more. But some see the benefits of production and do it on principle. Not everyone is a corrupt Roman senator out of Fellini's Satyricon when they have the financial support. Though many are, granted, the cynical view is not necessarily the correct one.
I am not sure it is as simple as her friend's flagging it as inappropriate. If someone was that offended by her posting breastfeeding pictures, they could just hide her newsfeed or unsubscribe from her.

I am a breastfeeding mother who lives in Vancouver and to be completely honest with you, while I do breastfeed in public without any consideration for people around me (passport office, liquor store, park bench etc.) and do not cover myself up, I do feel that some women in my community take it too far to prove a point. Someone has either told them something and they are lashing out or they are simply trying to do something for the cause.

The article doesn't tell us what was the privacy level of her photos. I wonder if they were public and have been taken down for that reason.

If Facebook, however, is in the business of taking down private photos, then anyone posting a picture of their child could be seen as a child pornography, couldn't it? And that is not even legal.

Methinks that there is more to this story. Something is not adding up.
I will give you the answer now -- it won't hold up :). Parsing and handling email is notoriously finicky, and every app I've written or maintained to do it has a constant stream of little bugs and edge cases that must be tested and handled that grow over time.

Would be interested to see a followup in 6-12 months.
At intigi.com we're trying to solve this problem and have a beta product working. It not only helps you find interesting links in the way described in the article, but it also helps curating and sharing them.
Interesting comment about data-driven decisions and creative processes at Zynga: http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/pc6j9/iama_former_full...

I've often wondered, how do you balance the two? When you have that much data, wouldn't it be insane to go by what any single person thinks is "good design"?
Can you please post a link to see the features of VS2010? So we can compare. Thank you.
Ebook sales are being driven by downmarket genre fiction
Jeez man, I explicitly prefaced my comment with "nitpick", as in "minor quibble" as in "not overly important." I can't help not many people get very excited by a page turn animation.
I was hoping to find some sort of statistics showing how students are not better off after learning through KA, but I didn't find it. It would have been very helpful in minimizing the bias the article has against KA, because at least it would show a concrete evidence of the claims presented in the article.

KA applied Jane McGonigal's concept in her Ted Talk on game theory, where players are encouraged to continue with a quest through awards and points. This is lacking in traditional education, where only those on top get awards, and those on the bottom do not, perpetuating the problem throughout the lives of the students.

Also, there was no solution, except something around the line that this is not a panacea (nothing is) and that we should reconsider how we think of KA. An alternative or a better idea would have best ended the article that so criticizes how KA is so wrong.
We've used a similar effect in a sales collateral portal. We have a bunch of PDF sales sheets, and small brochures. The client wanted sales reps to be able to preview the PDF in a more lightweight form, and the page turn helps visualize the printed layout a bit.
Weren't tactics like these employed by...oh...the Soviet Union? The Nazi Regime?

I'm getting so fucking sick of this shit.
my eyes got killed when I click on the link. bleeding orange. but got used to after a minute.
how do i check other users?
some minor glitch in html/css - on chrome top banner glues text together (I gave adblock turned on fyi)
last q: how do you scrap data??
yup, im an idiot! Good news is I had already deleted it and created new ones. Pretty ridiculous none the less. Thanks for the heads up
> Javascript, on the other hand, was designed to be asynchronous from the beginning. It had the perfect expressiveness for the job, and the libraries were all built to work in the environment. That is what made Node interesting, and why the hype followed. It solved peoples problems.

This is a bit of an overstatement, as we've seen since node became popular JS really doesn't have the appropriate amount of expressiveness. There are so many libraries that try to remove callback-hell from JS code (Step, node-fibers) but they all have their little issues and quirks because you just can't solve the problem well in JS. Now TameJS and IcedCoffeeScript are trying to attack the problem by implementing the solutions outside JS and compiling to it.
> Another possibility is that by pressing slightly harder, you cross the threshold of the paper's strength and wind up with an ugly hole.

As you press harder, the paper gets more and more compressed. You can't go directly from 1mm thickness to hole.

> In the digital world, if I change the low-order bit of a single number in a single calculation, the result will be only slightly inaccurate.

If your single number represents a boolean variable, then it will be completely innacurate.

And the behaviour of a program can be completely different depending on the value of that single variable: exit instead of resuming; change the value of $bank_account_amount instead of waiting for the lock; dereference an invalid pointer, etc. Note that these aren't especially crafted examples. They could happen with existing programs, and actually do every day.

Of course you could come up with real examples of small changes in an analog system resulting in big changes, but Dijkstra's point is not that such things do not exist, only that it is not the rule in analog systems we're used to dealing with.
The drawbacks of the Two Person review process are that it is [...] expensive: $8 billion a year is spent on subscriptions to journals, which is money that could be spent on more research.

None of that money goes to the two reviewers. The reviewers could do the same work for open access journals, and they would have (IMHO) no motivation not to do it for free.
Have you actually ever been a consumer of an extensive, pure REST API? At the point in time in which you are required to make a couple hundred requests in a single page in order to build something useful you'll start to wonder why it's touted so much.

Unless, of course, the company maintaining the API has the resources to have almost all requests cached and a responsible data design to facilitate accurate ETAG matching. If not... well you are going to be at the whim of their server architecture.

Even then, that's an incredible amount of calls to make just to display some information.
They actually did a writeup on their photo storage system a while ago: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=76191543919

Note that the delete operation merely marks the data deleted - they don't actually purge or overwrite it. Perhaps there's some kind of bug in this deleted-marking system? Kind of weird they haven't been able to fix it yet though.
Good points. I think a lot of it depends on the definition of "consumption." Most people use it pejoratively to mean "mindless consumption," but personally I don't think I engage in that much "mindless consumption." Sure, I surf reddit and hn, but most of my time online is spent either having conversations like this one, laughing at funny stuff (surely entertainment and comedy can't be all bad), or actively educating myself (e.g. reading programming articles, current events). Actually, I think even "mindlessness" can have benefits: everyone knows the value of relaxation or even meditation.
A lot of buzz can qualify has "hype" in my opinion. Node has gotten a lot of attention over the past year, just like Erlang got a few years before and Haskell in there too. The only difference people actually started using Node.
hi! I'm going to CPBR. I'm a web developer from Recife and addicted to HN. I even made a Chrome extension related to HN: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3511983
Reminds me a bit of FeynTube, which replaces YouTube comments with Richard Feynman quotes: https://github.com/CodeFarmer/feyntube
Pretty cool! Does anyone here have any "real-world" experience with this?
Facebook is proud of their hacker culture.

Sometimes a hacker is one who is expert at programming and solving problems with a computer.

Sometimes a hacker is someone who hacks particularly, one who cuts with rough or heavy blows.

In the race to the deadline, the next release, the IPO, a lot of good engineering fails by the wayside.
I wonder how many people like myself read this and thought "hey, good point, I already knew it but this reaffirms that I am wasting valuable time that I should be using to seize the day" and then went looking for something else on hacker news to fill the void. Disclaimer: I am on my lunch break.
Well, in your case, in addition to not overly important, your point is flat out wrong.

My frustration isn't with you in particular, it's just that HN doesn't seem to be able to enjoy a good hack anymore. It's just a circlejerk of people saying <some cool thing> isn't suitable for widespread use.
Timidity Does Not Convince
I wonder why they didn't use SNMP instead. It seems to be the standard for this type of thing.
My 16 year old son took the online Introduction to AI class and liked it very much. I told him that Udacity plans to offer an entire online CS curriculum & certification, and he's now very interested in evaluating if he wants to get an Udacity degree instead of going to a more traditional university. I guess I will have to do some serious thinking before I decide if I should encourage him to get an Udacity education or a more traditional education.
A license to link? Lowe's has one