skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
TeeChip Coupons and promo codes bring you a huge variety of TeeShirt collections where you can get your customize your designs or get to choose from designs that are unique and trendy. Gift or buy, with TeeChip discount Code you can easily get your hands on some amazing stuff and accessories. Check out the products, and make shopping worth every penny.
Vectors in this case are more like an array of numbers, often in the thousands, where each number represent a concept associated with the word. So for example, "elephant" will have have values in the cells representing "animal", "grey", "big", "noun", etc... but low values in "verb", "abstract", "flight", etc... The meaning of these cells is usually not explicit, it is something that emerges from the model learning process, but since these models are usually trained on human language, you often find human concepts in there.

And indeed, mathematically, they are the same as vector in physics, just with a lot more dimensions. And indeed there is a concept of magnitude (norm) and direction. Some processes only use the "direction", throwing away the magnitude through a process called normalization, some don't care, and some actually make use of the magnitude.
He also said 2014, maybe you need to reread that comment once more. Those were times when Ukraine was not clearly separated from Russia, for example most of big boys in the Government were openly pro-Russian. Ukraine have been a rebel since 1991 and the process is yet to be finished.

Boy, Ukraine have never had a proper borderline with Russian, I mean most of that border was nothing more than just demarcation sticks.
I came to the comments specifically to talk about this first example. I also think the left design is not a bad design. It's just a different style, but both are valid. Maybe the one on the right is more trendy but that's it.

The other examples are more sensible, but this specific one is just the author forgetting about subjectivity.
thats less than they invested in Magic Leap :)
It seems rather limited given you can only select 3 books
If we want to go forward we absolutely need to shut these fools down, the only solution proposed to the problem is, you need to be poor. I don't understand how people get on-board with it. From the outside it really looks like a cult to be honest.

Weirdest thing in my opinions is how much of educated people also fall in the scam as well
The fiddliness of bleeding a hydraulic brake line is exactly why I stick with cable actuated disk brakes on my bike hah. And even if the front wheel gets knocked out of the brake a bit it's trivial to go home, put it on the stand, and move the wheel around.

Hydraulic brakes are definitely fun but my bike is a compromise between low effort and utility. I'm running a 2x right now and running a barend shifter up front because my height and bike geometry means I often knock the front derailleur cable out of place. I should probably just switch to a 1x at this point.
It's a pun (a wordplay).
Garum is fish sauce widely associated with ancient Rome and Greece.
Based on that I found this reddit discussion where Ron Pressler (Loom project) commented:

"The posts read like they’re leading to a negative conclusion, but at the end of part 2 it turns out that the current Loom prototype does perform as well as async in their experiments ..."

https://www.reddit.com/r/java/comments/kmn6m3/do_looms_claim...
> it makes you feel you can click on elements

This is not intrinsic to the design, just a force of habit. The design on the right looks perfectly clickable to me.
That story does not support your claim.

And Tavistock was not doing surgeries.
You can get third party rp2040 modules or just the raw chip, easily. Not with the (proprietary licensed?) Wifi stuff, and definitely not official.
The news story I remember reading said that he was indeed confused and finally realized it really did not have a basement, at which point he realized how misled he was and then he walked outside and surrendered to police. He later remarked something like "Yeah, there was bad intel there".
I suspect you are using "constexpr code/function" in a strange way. I believe most people use it to refer to code that is constexpr-qualified, such as "constexpr void foo() {...}". You seem to be using to refer to code that is a core constant expression, and that is where (most of) the misunderstanding comes from.

Still, it should be noted that even code that looks identical to a core constant expression can display certain kinds of UB if invoked at runtime, per the standard. For example, if the code is using certain STL classes or threading constructs in a way that is UB, it can still be considered a core constant expression. Additionally, the code may be well defined when used in a single-threaded context, but become UB when used in multi-threaded contexts, say if two threads are accessing an object member concurrently without the right barriers.

Here is an example on godbolt. Notice that bar() and baz() are defined the same way in the static_assert block and the runtime block, yet executing them constitutes UB in one case but not the other.

https://godbolt.org/z/3q5sTGe4j
Love how "German" is an emergent property
The full title of the article is "A Number System Invented by Inuit Schoolchildren Will Make Its Silicon Valley Debut" but that is too long for the submission form. The "Will Make Its Silicon Valley Debut" part is referring to the numerals being included in the September 2022 update of Unicode and Google building a font for the numerals.
Tell HN: I'm sorry I thought you were an AI!
During a high-stakes conversation with internal helpdesk, the support person sent me a link which seemed to the exact same URL as I was having the chat.. That and some missing feedback minor details on the previous conversation text lead me to believe I was talking with an automated system..

I was wrong, the link differed by a few trailing characters, and was correct for what I was asking.. I was totally in the wrong. And I apologized to the person.

I wonder, how often this happens to the heroes behind online support ? And, I'm sorry I contributed to this behaviour! I will be mindful not to do it again.
sort.Slice and then https://pkg.go.dev/slices@master#Compact
Want to Elevate Your PR Strategy? Learn from B2B Tech and PR Expert David Libby
You could/can get this with Twitter lists, and it's actually way better than anything else.
> EVE is famously anything-goes, with corporations (EVE equivalent of guilds) being very careful about who they accept specifically to prevent this type of attack.

Really? The general run of comments seems to indicate that the attack could only succeed because nobody in the targeted corporation noticed a popup warning them about the attack for 72 straight hours.

That strongly suggests that very few corporations should have any guards at all in place to prevent this type of attack, because there's no way for the attack to succeed unless everyone in the targeted corporation has stopped playing the game.

What are people worried about?
Yes that's true, literally all representative democracies are the same and no political progress has been made anywhere in the world the past few decades. We have seen no advances in equitable social democracies, and gay people are just as oppressed as they've ever been. Access to gender reassignment surgery and abortions? Oh, we've never heard of that. Just don't do anything, it's fine, you literally don't matter!
Depends on the region. In my country beef comes largely from dairy cows, because it would be too expensive otherwise. It's pretty chewy, hence not particularly popular.

That being said cows are grown for meat here - just not for domestic consumption.
Its not an interface though:

public abstract class Reader

Did Java add multiple inheritance or am I missing something?
Here's a more detailed and brutal article on fake plastic recycling:

https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2022-india-plastic-recycl...

It doesn't seem to be paywalled, but just in case:

https://archive.is/O1iGo
I thought the iron triangle was scope, cost, time, with quality in the middle.
Missed an opportunity to do YMCA
They did not propose surgeries because no way of doing so were available until relatively recently.

And your claim of a hysteria of kids being told to transition closely mirrors the claim of kids being pressured into satanic rituals and similar. It's similarly fear driven and bigoted.
Didn't they already say that themselves?

Did you miss out on your ususal chance to kick a puppy on your way to work today or something?
> I disagree. Federation is a feature people want, but they don't know about the concept.

I think they want it, but by an order of magnitude more, they want simple UX. Everything else is a distant second. UX is the foundation upon which everything else is built. Without an excellent UX, the audience will forever remain niche. I tried to just sign up to Mastodon, and it was a clusterfuck of proportions so unbelievable that I can't believe it has as many users as it does - and it only has a couple million users.
Before I begin to ramble; I don't see where your "just" comes from, in other words, where is the difference between our two statements?

> > it's irrelevant if you generate your HTML in PHP, JS, Rust or Python: you need abstraction and modularization for large frontends.

> Yes, it's just that some of us prefer to leverage our existing stack (ie. abstract and modularize with Django/Twig templates) than adding yet another layer to the lasagna. > Nothing against SPA frameworks (ex: we do use Vue/Vuetify for some apps with complex user interface), but there are many cases where it's actually just bloat.

Sure, I agree with you!

What I don't like is the contrarian attitude of htmx team and the pretence of not using JavaScript. It's just progressive enhancement, a valuable and very old approach.

IMO, an approach best implemented without a "framework" like HTMX.

I mentioned Alpine, because I think in combination with blade "components" (which are just fancy template partials), I think it's better than HTMX (subjective opinion).
Still, I'd advise against Alpine and for a simple external JS file for anything more serious than an MVP or a landing page.

Kudos to the htmx developers, who made a library out of their idea of progressive-enhancement JS.

My point is just that I don't like two things which seemingly repeat in each of their blog posts:

- They define their own language around REST and hypermedia to explain a string-language in HTML-attributes, which is then executed by JS. It's really not much different from Alpine. It's called "progressive enhancement" and a DSL in HTML attributes is not needed to implement it

- They start most posts about their library with a lengthy ramble about "cool kids and SPAs" vs "good old server-rendered HTML". This is a tiresome trope.

The first time I read their "HATEOAS / Rest is for humans" article, I found it witty.
The second time I read an article explaining their appproach, I found it interesting.

By now, I just skip all the htmx stuff and jumped to the meat of the post, the new (JS!) API for page transitions.

I'm not really interested in learning a new "JS-in-HTML"-language.

TL;DR: Have you ever heard of frontend-fatigue-fatigue? :D

I wrote lots of vanilla JS which abused HTML attributes in similar ways.

For a simple landing page, I'll probably try htmx some day instead of writing this myself.

But I tend to not like this whole approach of "magic strings in HTML". When I do this in my own code, the point where an internal alarm rings is usually when HTML attributes start referencing comma-separated lists of unchecked... somethings (usually IDs).
I overwhelmingly prefer the Contacts window on the left to the one on the right.
China’s emissions per capita is still about half of the US
https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-pe...
If we're talking about Sony, it's probably vision related A.I. accelerators. Their Alpha cameras depend on them very much. Even my now old A7-III can do amazing things realtime.
Where I am it's hard to find quality people period. If anything targeting Kotlin or Scala developers usually yields slightly better developers but also further restricts an already small candidate pool.
Really? So you mean to say there are no quality people in the millions of Java programmers out there?
Consider my answer [1]

Also I have vouched the top comment of this tree because I consider this point as valid.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35537017
In the Silicon Valley TV show, Richard also gets the Hooli board to sign a document, which Gavin (Hooli CEO) has 2 hours to object to, but he's off doing a triathlon.
I think the point is that to go faster, you have to throw disproportionately more people at something, and probably build it in a different way to accommodate that, and test the integration of their work more. Cost is people x time, not just time. Three people working steadily for a year will be far more efficient than 20 people working for 6 months.
In the case of US Federal Bureau of Prisons, I suspect the actual reason is this: they have over 36,000 employees. When you have that many employees, an email migration project is not going to be cheap. Even at private sector prices, you are looking at a multi-million dollar project; then you have to add the usual federal contracting overhead. But, many other US government agencies used GroupWise too, and they all migrated off it–so very achievable if you have the budget.

Which is probably the real problem – does Congress want to appropriate US$X million so federal prison guards can have a better email system? They did that for heaps of other federal agencies, because those agencies made arguments "our staff will be so much more efficient at catching terrorists/reviewing licensing applications/whatever if we had better IT", and that convinced Congress to appropriate the money, and then the email migration funding came out of that. By contrast, BOP argues "better IT will make us more efficient at rehabilitating prisoners" and Congress goes "yawn, you think we really care about that?..."
One only needs to compare C programming manuals with the programming manuals from systems programming languages being developed outside Bell Labs.

Also note that C author's were naturally aware of these issues and created lint in 1979.

Now getting people to use such tooling is another matter, apparently 50 years weren't enough.
Does ASAP means, anytime in my lifetime?
> Sure, if some kind of governmental oversight rationing your carbon output is introduced, where you must ask yourself these questions or else, then yes. But that would be such a bleak future...

Alternatively the government could just tax carbon emissions and let people make their own decisions about how to spend their money.
See here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/12a6szd/pandemic_horde...

I haven't personally confirmed it, but it seems that there were only 1k shares outstanding, meaning that Flam Hill somehow had the original 1k created when the company was founded.

This would be a slightly more interesting story if someone found a company where, say, 90% of the outstanding shares were owned by inactive accounts, sneakily acquired 6% on the cheap, and then started and won a vote to become CEO, but it doesn't seem like that happened here. (Assuming that pseudononymous Reddit claim was correct, of course.)
Good. The bible is not the only source of mores and norms to swear on. And a turn towards science would be nice, especially in the increasingly alarmingly anti-science USA.
>As soon as you start worrying about power, or GPIO, then it starts to get a bit messy.

7nm-10nm X86 CPUs from Intel and AMD are nearly as efficient as a R-PI, IPC for IPC, and GPIOs can be extended on them via USB in a standardized manner if desired.

Most people buy R-Pis to run linux, python, a web server or turn on some LEDs. Linux, python and web servers can be run on low power X86 machines, and LEDs can be turned on by an Arduino or R-PI 2040 microcontroller.

People stuck to using R-Pis out of comfort and inertia because it was the only thing they heard about and it was the best thing at the time when X86 was not competing in the space, but today it's no longer the only option or the best option. People need to start exploring the other options.
Coinbase support is terrible, even for long time users.
Just a quick rant about the crypto space, and word of advice.

I have been a user of Coinbase for over 10 years. I was involved in Bitcoin back in 2011.

I love Bitcoin for so many reasons but I think a lot of people in the space are delusional. It's been even clearer lately as I have had ridiculous issues with Coinbase.

Essentially, my account is locked because of a weird ID verification problem that seems to be caused by my account being so old. Looks like their new interface has a bug with my specific account in their database for some reason that isn't fully clear to me.

They told me they couldn't fix the bug so I needed to create a brand new account so they could transfer my balance from the old account to the new account. Alright... thanks for wasting my time. So, I did that. And now, after a month and 20 emails of back and forth, I'm being ping ponged with new agents who have ZERO context of what's happening sending me generic pre-formatted answers without ever moving the needle. So, I still don't have access to my funds.

Anyone who thinks these platforms are better than banks is insane. A real bank would not make me deal with bullshit like this for a month (and I wouldn't be surprised if it took another 2-3 months to solve this).

Point is: a technology, and a company that actually works and actively serves its customers well - are two different things altogether. The centralized financial systems have lots of issues, but banks overall do what they can to address customer problems. Coinbase is very disappointing here - being the large, famous platform that it is. I will certainly close my accounts as soon as I can access my assets and never look back. What a shame.
I remember there was a time when people were excited about medium. Then medium needed some money so they started blocking readers behind login dialog boxes. Then come substack and everyone got excited about it. Sooner or later it will be on same path that medium took.

When will we realise that blogging websites (not personal blogs) are not sustainable in long run.
Is there any actual strict requirement that you have to swear over a document of some kind?

I'd have thought swearing over the bible is a stand-in for swearing "before God", and that God would ultimately be your reckoner should you break your oath.

If you don't have that meaning behind the oath, what is the point in using a book at all unless it's something meaningful like the constitution of your country, as another poster has used as an example, or some other relevant document that is there as physical representation of something abstract?

If I, not being religious, were being sworn in as the head of NASA, I'd find it much more poignant to swear over the US constitution, or on nothing at all.
Should be swearing to the us taxpayer.
I just chew the raw coffee beans, drink water and hold my face out in the sun.
Strange, you just fell into the trap of making the exact same point I was making. It is, to any practical standpoint, impossible to exist in this economy without having some footprint of some kind at some point. If not direct, then indirect.

So what then? Are you still contending that constructing nuclear is a bad idea because the supply chain of a nontrivial endeavour has a non-zero carbon footprint?

And yes, memes are a meme for a reason. It seems strange that you think that an idea achieving meme status invalidates it? Are you trying to offer a response, or are you only interested in feeling like you want an Internet debate? I suppose if it’s the latter then… umm… well done? Well done on dodging the actual discussion at hand.
Thats because they are hypocrites. You can't separate *nix shell from awk, less, grep, jq, insert-whatever-little-tool-with-random-argument-parser-here. Once you do that, it feels like the uncanny universe of organic horrors.

Don't get me wrong. Yey for the *nix stuff, I am huge fan. We wouldn't be here if that was absent. I am not working for MS or anybody that have stakes here. Its simply no comparrison.
I've been thinking about boredom and the need for change for a long time. My hypothesis is that boredom is the baseline of life. From this basis, I feel like whatever we may do we will inevitably come back to boredom: again, the dog chasing his own tail. Wouldn't be better to live with boredom instead of having the illusion of escaping it from it now and then?
You can also throw the ball, aka gameification of parts of the activity, so the success nerds can be busy romping and playing, while the other grown ups get on with the actual fun part.
The sized uint sure, I get that.

But the rest of the code? I guess you could make it so the dereference and pointer-increment happen separately. And for someone unfamiliar you could expand out the loop condition.

But ultimately it's a hash function. How would you write it?
So.. that's just a card moving simulator ? I am missing something crazy or why does this have that many points on Hacker news ?
> The Semicolon Wars (2008)

2008? From TFA:

This Article From Issue
July-August 2006
Volume 94, Number 4
Page 299

DOI: 10.1511/2006.60.299

So 2006, not -08, I'd think.
> The problem I found with this (and many other recommendation engines) is that I've read all of the suggestions.

Immediately had the same experience: input a Theroux, Bill Bryson and Bruce Chatwin into the engine, as I've been longing for some new travel books to read, but naturally it just gave me... five or six other books by Paul Theroux and Bill Bryson.

Definitely needs more input parameters to be useful.
Secret scanning now shows metadata for active GitHub tokens
If you've got the patience to feed all your books into librarything, the recommendations are incredible - for me virtually the whole first page are all books I've already read, but don't own.

I don't think its recommendation engine is anything sophisticated, it's just working with really really rich data.
Thanks so much for the advice!
To be clear, this is using manufacturer's developer API to interact with their online services and not with the washing machine. Also something often managed by Home Assistant and alike.
This is complete nonsense.

1) Carbon accounting is extremely challenging even for teams of experts who dedicate a lot of time and effort to it, and even then the results are often contested.

2) If we're not at net negative carbon emissions by 2050 we're in deep trouble, and no amount of personal piety will fix things.
You initialized this thread by talking about real numbers and not per capita. US military emissions is what, 1-2% of the US' total emissions? So even if you were to change something about the US' per capita emissions, removing their military entirely would barely move the needle. Why then is it the existence of this military in particular that's the reason your country doesn't need to change?

I get that you don't want to do anything, but you can just choose to do that, you know? You don't need to justify it at all, you have every right to simply do as you wish, at least for the moment.
The players
Depends what product. A toaster has very similar functionality to its competitors, so it needs to attract buyers with style and design elements.

When functionality is a given like it is for a kitchen toaster, we can argue the presentation and style is more important.
I think we need to start acting against it as much as we can especially us in tech we bear a big responsibility for borowing our craftsmanship to anti human ideals and cult like herd mentality, this is a very grave issue in my opinion
In what technical way are these properties emergent? It seems that stated another way they are simply a natural consequence of more accurate language prediction and therefore not emergent except in how we perceive them.