skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
When I say "a constexpr function", I mean "a function that is legally constexpr-qualified". An expression calling such a function with a constant argument is a core constant expression, as long as the evaluation of the function given that argument doesn't produce UB or leak memory.

But, this tells us nothing about whether calling the same function with some other argument would produce UB or not. Unless we try to form a core constant expression containing a call to that function for every possible argument value, we can't be sure if the function is free of UB for every possible input value.

My point, more simply, is: the fact that foo(1) is verified by the compiler to be a core constant expression is not a guarantee that foo(2) would be a core constant expression as well. Your original comment seems to me to imply that it does.

The consequence of this is that, as said elsewhere, this trick only helps to ensure that a unit test is not accidentally passing because of UB (and that memory is not leaked for that input value). It doesn't help provide any other guarantees.
ChatGPT (GPT-4) is pretty excellent at taking react code I write and rewriting it in the format I ask to be more idiomatic or concise!
Only true for continuous RF sources.

For transient signals you need at least Nyquist frequency.
May be I'm old, but I love long form content and twitter took that away. People write long tweet threads instead of thinking things through and writing it in long form. This gives rise to tons of twitter thread collapsing tools/startups that push the concatenation of these tweets to Notion or whatever. This seems utterly silly to me. It almost looks like tech for the sake of tech. It's unfortunate that substack is going in the same direction. Are there no better problems to solve using tech?
> when you sell a capability you are making a commitment

Sure. And if you sold the promise of future capability with no intent on delivering it, that's fraud. But if you try, it isn't. And if you fail, your customers should have a claim on you. But I don't think it should be a crime.
The newest GitHub Shop collection
The last big money grab (PPP "loans") was easy pickings for fraudsters. I'm guessing this will happen here too.
>the most massive LLMs do not even attempt to abstract and manipulate even basic concepts

then how does this work?

H: translate the following sentence to instead use olympic curling related metaphors ( do not explicitly mention curling, and do not use similes in forming the translation ): man:"I've been spinning my tires all day without getting anywhere" woman:"running out of gas?" man:"nah, I'm gassed up, geared up, oiled and revving. I just can't seem to get in the right lane, you know?" woman:"anything knocking?" man:"nah, I'm tuned just fine. I can't seem to get my GPS to connect, you know?" woman:"take a few laps without a destination, see if you can figure out the lay of the land" man:"you know, that might help. thanks barbara"
R: man: "I've been sweeping the ice all day without hitting the target."
. woman: "Losing momentum?"
. man: "Nah, I've got the energy, the technique, and the focus. I just can't seem to find the right path, you know?"
. woman: "Anything coming in your way?"
. man: "Nah, I'm on point with my aim. I just can't seem to get my strategy to align, you know?"
. woman: "Maybe glide a few times without aiming specifically, see if you can figure out the ice conditions."
. man: "You know, that might help. Thanks, Barbara."

I find it unlikely that these larger models do anything less than abstract and manipulate concepts.

( my apologies to anyone that has seen me paste this same example more than once, I find it a very good and succinct example for the topic )
That was massively rude and uncharitable, I'm not engaging with someone like you.
With so many sites designed to track activity (and per-user activity) on Twitter, I'd lean towards "no mass exodus" simply from the fact that I haven't seen any gotcha graphs/charts/data literally showing it.

However, anecdotally, my relatively static "following" count dropped from ~1k to ~600 over the course of the back-to-back Elon/Mastodon/Trump/etc events that were supposed to prompt mass exoduses. That could be 40% of the accounts I follow blocking me or getting banned, but deleting their accounts seems more likely in this instance.
ssa.gov has a "Sign in" link that leads to buttons for login.gov (which I have successfully used), id.me, and a legacy password for the site. To clarify, this is the Social Security Administration. It seems the Internal Revenue Service still needs to onboard to login.gov.
Very similar story here on the PM side in the US.

~15 YOE (FB/Meta most recently), ramping up a search after a sabbatical, targeted job search to roles where I have non-trivial experience and domain expertise, customized cover letters, leveraging my network, open to relocation, open to hybrid or remote, etc.

I'm seeing 3-5% response rate over the past few months. It's rough out there. No response for seemingly great matches. Slow moving recruiting process, even at early-stage startups. Rejections after screenings and first round interviews where the mutual fit seemed excellent.

Hiring manager friends and talkative recruiters tell me that in contrast to the past decade where they'd routinely screen people who met most of what they're looking for, they're now dealing with a massive volume of very qualified applicants (and trudging through a massive volume of unqualified applicants). Deciding who to screen and who to do a first round of interviews with is taking a lot more time and effort. And the first round of interviews might include 6-8 unicorn (i.e. perfect) candidates, where in the past they'd be elated to find 1 unicorn.

I've been through a couple down cycles, so I'm focused on grinding away till I find something. I think every level is feeling the pain in some proportional way. Big sympathy for early career folks. Even if we reset compensation expectations, it'd be a shame if the sector ends up losing out permanently on a range of talent. There's no way tech needs are going to decrease on a medium-term horizon (though they may shift).
> How do you know when there is content to scroll then? You randomly scroll parts of the screen to see if they move?

Sometimes, but more often I press on page down to read more content until there's no more content to read, so having scrollbar is pointless: it eats screen real estate without providing anything in return
lol, really? I got $16k in PPP loans without breaking a sweat. I spent all of ten minutes filling out forms. What are you talking about?
Which will force drive signed communications. So... win.
This is exactly what it is. If you can’t afford the down payment, how can you afford the mortgage?
Sorry for the confusion, I'm trying to interview for only staff/senior staff level roles. This company just had a job listing for "Software Engineer" to build out a new initiative so I decided check it out. And yeah, not getting the 20% pay bump between job hops that I'm looking for.
Crashes are the easiest bugs to self-fix.
Just read the Tufte books for guidelines as well as inspiration. https://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/books_ei
Large Language Model Blues – The AI revolution made me feel bad, but I’m OK now
I mean consider also: Imagine being in a position where you can spend 40 billion and it doesn't wipe you out.
There are many other professions which have similar gender gaps. They’re not talked about because the professions aren’t growing as fast and don’t make as much money for such relatively low time investment.
The number of cores in a CPU is an important factor in determining its overall processing power, with more cores generally leading to better performance for tasks that can be parallelized. However, not all software is designed to take advantage of multiple cores, so having more cores does not always translate to better performance in every application.
Nothing about a zero or few-shot classifier precludes you from validating on a data set.
I never saw a scantron at my college.

I thought UTAustin was an elite school.
I think you're reading the word "potential" incorrectly for the context. Dictionaries are tricky things to read, because they tend to incorrectly communicate nuances. The capability to do something means that it can be done, not that it might be able to be done. Otherwise, my Honda has the capability to fly.
More patchwork solutions a la healthcare style that adds more complexity for ordinary people.

When people couldn't afford to actually use health insurance due to high deductibles, what did the gov't do? Come up with HSA and HRA programs.

This is yet another giveaway to landlords and ways to prop up housing market that is one a decline.
The whole point of the fallacy is that this other stuff isn't relevant to the truth of the argument, and it does nothing to inform us about the argument.

You can't figure out the time by arguing over broken clocks. And you're only interested in staying on message here, not about whether these things are even true or not.
How many people read the reviews on Jetpens and then buy the pen from Amazon though. Obviously not so many to put them out of business, but that's always the danger.
I don't think this behavior has changed significantly. The key issue is that they seem to have correctly identified that they wanted to prefetch a single task, but they didn't recognize that this setting is the count of un-ACK'ed tasks. If you ACK upon receipt (as most consumers do by default), then you're really prefetching two tasks - one that's being processed, and one that's waiting to be processed. If you ACK late, you get the behavior that TFA seems to want. I've seen this misconfiguration a number of times.
Machine translation isn't super human yet. But yes, it's probably only a few years away.
Heh. So, we did a similar two loan structure back in 2004. It got us into the house, but paying both loans at once was stressful for several years until the family income finally caught up enough to provide a comfortable margin of safety.
I think most people realize that people on visas can be in an additionally tough situation during layoffs.

I think the commenter's helpful suggestion has an implied "Unfortunately, this doesn't help everyone, but..." In an attempt to help the people it can help.

For people currently in certain especially difficult or unfair situations, it might hurt less to know that people are sympathetic, though they might feel powerless to help right now.

Knowing that, maybe some of the people getting the short end of the stick would prefer not to have that constantly articulated. I can only guess at when is the right time to articulate, and when to leave it implied.
There is zero chance the manufacturing environment can move that fast. I know I work in it.

The government can place all the magic words on the page they want, there are structural limits to how fast mines, plants, and other things can be built, even if Ford, GM, VW etc can switch their factories to EV's there is an entire supply chain that can not spin up that fast. Copper and Lithium production alone would need to increase by like 900%, that is not happening in just a few years time.
What a steal for the folks who managed to time this, likely didn't help anyone who actually would have meaningfully benefitted from this.
There are permissioned "blockchains" which are just private ledgers, that banks could use with permission from the US gov't. These can be anything from a centrally run DB with ACLs or something like Hyperledger with permissioned P2P access. Whether you call it a blockchain or a DB with ACLs is immaterial; it's still much cheaper, faster, and pleasant to use this system over the current system of complex intermediaries in the US. Europe seems to have solved this problem with SWIFT.
The line between "an advanced, niche concept" and "common sense" is very blurry. It's continuous, not discrete. What you think it common sense is probably not for a considerable proportion of other people.

Regarding the actual topic at hand though, I actually do agree with you (hence disagree with OP), since I do believe that mastering concepts like color theory and typography are indeed extremely low on the extensive priority list of things to master to create great UIs.

I've been building them, and convinced people to pay me quite handsomely for them, for quite a considerable amount of time, and never have I had to deep-dive into typography, color theory, or the like.
I wonder what would happen if instead the state spent the 300m on building houses and selling them, say, 10% below market price or sth.

Well I guess you can build a fair few houses for that money. In this programme it was funding 20% of the house rather than 100%, but the 100% also includes the markups of the various business doing the building.

Meanwhile, not only do you end up with more houses, diluting the price down, but also neighbouring sellers / developers need to compete with the state cheapo houses, bringing prices further still.

Of course the other thing that happens is that because housing is a localized Ponzi scheme, local residents are aghast (understandably to me) because after years of saving to buy a house, the state devalues their property.

Though maybe if you spread out the housing... Now I'm just thinking aloud.
Higher mental flow that elicits pleasure in Chinese calligraphic handwriting
Same. Ran a perf test recently. With two 1 core brokers I got 2000 rps with persistence and peaked at 12000 rps with non-persistence.

We’ve also had similar issues as OP, except fixing it just came down to configuring the Java client to have 0 prefetch so that long jobs don’t block other msgs from being processed by other clients. Also using separate queues wide different workloads.
Why I've generally liked substack: they export RSS feeds (https://support.substack.com/hc/en-us/articles/360038239391-...). Thus far I have little to no interest in getting substack content through anything other than a feed reader though.
Of course. It's never been about free speech, but promoting Musk's personal interests and brand of politics.
I mean, they just gave you a demo on a robot that wiggles around inside of a pipe with all sorts of 3D generated content. if that's low effort content in your book...
I did not said that are the same, the llama has a lot of information in it , the issue seems to be the Q&A chat part. This can be added on top by the community without having to start from scratch IMO. But I might be wrong, and OpenAI put some magic shit in , some super secret unpublished stuff, in that case educate me. In my mind I compare with Stable Diffusion, the proprietary ones produce more artistic effects because they put some more stuff into the prompts and they are imposing their styles. With SD you have the control and you need to wait for some improvements, plugins, new loras or embedings with new styles etc.
In SD I could train my face in 1- minutes, with proprietary shit it will never happen...

Imagine what a math community could train, they just need access to the model and soem GUI software that can help them train.

So llama based Chat stuff is not yet comparable with ChatGPT but there are already lot of progress made. At this moment coding and math is bad in llama based but other stuff is great, like story creation, also I only could test 3-b 4bit and it is good enough to for example provide me a complex response in valid JSON format.
Well, drive by wire wasn't just put out there, it was tested on military jets for decades and the tech eventually got to cars. There are also testing rigs and failsafes for such designs, however Tesla is just putting a black-box AI on the roads in charge of massive vehicles.

I'm not going to engage with someone like you any longer, though, as you're being really fucking rude.
More that most undergrad colleges only teach and test regurgitation because the profs don't care about education.
It seems they just passed the questions in, which is totally fine but I'd just add that this gives you pretty much a lower bound of performance. I think it's worse if you try and make it output very small responses, and does a lot better if it can output a lot (chain of thought). I'm continually astonished at how well gpt4 can handle problems with literally no additional work, and how much you can improve it with some small help.

Edit I asked question 1m but said it was an expert in QM and was there to explain the answer to test questions followed by answering them and it gets it right with a page or so of proof (please don't attack my use of the word proof, I'm a lay man - this also explains my failure to fix the numbering, latex editing on a phone is not my forte). I've not checked it, but it gets the right answer.

https://figshare.com/articles/preprint/GPT4_answers_a_QM_que...
All of those conditions appear to be satisfied.
Go and get a gun and you have a healthy diet of rabbits stuffed with onions and carrots.
Interesting insight, thanks for sharing that.
One thing that is often lost with the free speech argument is amplification. For example, no one is stopping most people from going and yelling on a street corner. But that doesn't mean that you need to be allowed to speak in a particular venue or platform. Our society is currently not one in which there is a right to "equal volume" on speech, and I think that's a good thing.

The entire free speech movement was a response to government literally throwing people in jail for even talking about a given topic. It was never about allowing minority opinions to be as loud as majority opinions.
non-FAANG - I'm familiar with Disney's salary levels, and would say I'm getting offers at a level below what I would expect (or 40k-60k below on base).
If I got that wrong, then I apologize.
so when you have a student driver, or a new driver, the lives of not just them but the people around them are being risked just to test a system. so we should just stop all new drivers. no more new drivers. because a new driver, especially a teenage one, is orders of magnitude more dangerous than the current fsd.
Coming Soon: Substack Orange
Who could have predicted the demand for free money.

It's a mystery for the ages.
Malleus Maleficarum was propaganda fabricated in its totality by the church
I've been checking out Notes all morning (I write a jargon-free, FOMO-free, AI newsletter). It's kind of a weird product launch? My feed is primarily content that the people I subscribe to post or comment on, but I don't subscribe to that many people.

I'm not sure what the average number of subscriptions a Substack user has, but it seems like a very echo-chambery setup right now. As an author there are definitely things that I want to share that aren't worth of an email, but I'm pretty sure very few of my audience members are going to see it. Maybe this makes more sense for writers with audiences who are on the Substack app all day.
Just doing clearing without solving the other side of the issue is an example of the classic "tragedy of the commons" where people make decisions that benefit a few people greatly while having a larger negative impact that is distributed among a much larger group of people.

While we can do both, we need to start with preparing better solutions FIRST, because if we do clearing first we make the problems we need to solve with the better solutions worse.
To add another misconception, the Nyquist frequency is a lower bound, below which you necessarily get aliasing. It doesn't say anything about whether said sampling rate is sufficient for reconstruction or whatever your intended use is.

E.g. sampling a 1hz signal at 2hz still doesn't tell you if the signal was a 1hz sin or a 1hz sawtooth (depending on how lucky or unlucky you are).
I have mixed feelings about this and some of the other twitters clones I've been experimenting with: bluesky, mastodon, read.cv's posts, farcaster. They're reminding me of the wave of audio-first social features that came after the Clubhouse hype.

Though I do appreciate the niche focuses of these apps, e.g. posts is primarily designers, farcaster is a lot of crypto people, etc, I still use Twitter for most of my content discovery.
Seriously. I'm a much bigger fan of government intervention in markets than, I think, most on this site, but this program just seems insane. "House prices are too high—let's raise demand rather than address supply!" LOLWUT?

> "I thought the program was genius," said Scott Evans, executive vice president of Cross Country Mortgage, describing what he thought when he first heard about the new loan program.

Mortgage dude likes having more clients. Shocking.

> “When you sell the property or refinance the loan, they take up to 20% of the appreciation. The homeowner gets to keep 80%," he said.

Wow. This gets even weirder. At least I guess this means they'll likely make money on the whole thing, but I'm not sure I love a state government being an outright investor in private homes.
Sometimes the marketing is looking through the job description/requirements and thinking 'Oh, I know something that'd really help out in this situation' and tailoring your resume to that. (That sort of tailoring is somewhat reusable, too. :)

And cover letters are really good for this sort of thing as it lets you lay out some specifics that make you the type of person who can really help them out.
> On macOS, you can use Quicktime which lets you also select a geometric region within the screen.

Or Command + Shift + 5
You can now start a timer until they announce that they're going to algorithmically organize the feed of "Notes" because "chronological order is too hard to follow."

Then, they will let an Algo organize the feed of articles.

Then the ads - no, wait, the "sponsored post - will start popping in, etc, etc...

Maybe they won't. I enjoy substack as it is today, and maybe they'll pull it off. But I can't help seing this as the next step towards enshitification. In the words of a 21s century social media author : "so sad".
I'd still expect lots of issues considering Google probably doesn't really want their cloud services used on open devices even if people manage to make it work
It might not be super human in the sense of beating the C2 standard, but it sure knows more German than I do.

And Spanish, and Greek, and Esperanto, and… well, everything.

But I've been really trying with that German.
Lending money indiscriminately so people can buy houses they can’t afford? 2008 is calling, it wants its terrible idea back.
This is a wealth transfer from the tax payers to the landed gentry
Design is a field where there's no clear 'correct' answer, in a vast sea of opinions. Honestly UI design is surprsingly tame compared to other areas of design (interior, architecture, typography etc). If there's a uni near you, try go to a design critique where work is presented and discussed - it's intense. Debating work is a big part of being a designer.

Strategies to deal with disagreements, frankly a big part of it is being comfortable disagreeing. If you want to get more into design, know they're going to happen, and that there's not a clear answer, and it's not personal. A good designer should know it's about the work and the idea not where or who it came from. Source: am a UI designer.
Rate of violent crime in Montana continues to surpass national rate (2021)
The accept-language header isn't very reliable. For example, I'm not anywhere near the US but my language is set to en-us because that is where I'm from originally (same with the timezone trick). So you end up just identifying immigrants, migrants, and tourists, not necessarily people on a VPN.
* s/#499BE9/#ED7135
A little bit better: Array.from({ length: 100 }, () => ...)