skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://mosh.org/#faq:~:text=Q%3A%20What%20is%20Mosh%27s%20s...

The cryptography is standard AES-128 in OCB3 mode. It's been around long enough, and has had enough security scrutiny to at least discover a few minor DoS vulnerabilities, that it isn't entirely unreviewed.

For the cipher itself, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCB_mode#Attacks
A plaything to some is R&D to others.
Small things like passing new questions into the AI to check for novelty would be nice. Now, if they could find a way to flag and de-rank obviously out-of-date solutions, that would be cool.
We are launching something with the RDS team this week that will make it very easy to install your own extensions that are written in Trusted Languages. We will share more on Friday.

In terms of pl/rust becoming available on RDS and supabase: months. It’s going through security audits now
I wish Rust was more like Swift. Swift would be my perfect language if it wasn't almost exclusively used to build software that runs on Apple devices.
Dead Cells was written in Haxe.
I can't go back to edit, but I understand the downvote. It seems like I am saying only LLMs will be the sole authority. And that doesn't make sense, insofar as a model without the latest data may make the wrong recommendation, and--more importantly--the doctor would have the final say in the treatment plan.

What I mean is, if LLMs are able to match "here is what any reasonable person of equal experience would have done in the circumstances," [1] it would be very risky to try something counter to that.

The Large Language Model as Liability Limiting Machine.

[1] https://himpro.ca/reasonable-care-vs-standard-of-care/

> Reasonable care is the caution and concern used by an average, rational person in any given situation to prevent the harm of others.

> Standard of care is the acceptable standard of care acceptable in society or in a profession.
An anodyne comment like "imagine the long term health implications" is not discussing anything. If you have some alternative which does less harm and the cost/benefit is better, that would be something worth reading.
I dont think theyre saying Meta AI leaked it, but they anticipated someone else will and still went ahead with it as they wanted the consequences.
Tesla Model 2 will have 53kWh LFP battery pack
Saving the Mystery Symbols Carved into Australia’s Boab Trees
I would say type 3s are correct A the whole system is going to be replaced with software - so you might as well get on with it.

My take is software is a new form of literacy- not some neat technology like lasers or combustion engines. It's about human knowledge and human co-orindation - and we will all have to code just as we all have to be literate.

As such how many human systems today have not been fitted and overtaken completely by the written word? Some
maybe but precious few
It's usually exposed to public users. The security model is mostly based on two things:

- JWT is used to authenticate API requests. The JWT contains a `role` claim which is a PostgreSQL role that is then used for the duration of the request. This role is subject to regular PostgreSQL security, be it table, column or row-level security[1].

- You expose a subset of your database objects for your API schema. This schema consists of views and functions(or only functions) to hide internal details to API users[2].

[1]: https://postgrest.org/en/stable/auth.html#authentication-seq...

[2]: https://postgrest.org/en/stable/schema_structure.html#schema...
Outside of the roleplay, there's no "it". The thing that actually interacts with the user is the persona. But for the same reason, it doesn't matter what the underlying LLM "really thinks" - it'll be the persona that'll try to con you, or write broken or malicious code.
Laid off available for Node.js ReactNative development at $15/hour
Portfolio:
https://www.gilbertmpanga.com/
Email:
gilbertmpanga.gm@gmail.com
You can just ask if there is no output filtering
I used chapGPT to figure out how to get the same information that appears in *buffer-list* - it was a pretty quick session.
I think divestment of the A10s make sense. Those Fairchild frames are super dated and ill-suited for battles against peer adversary.
I think DF.jl works remarkably well as a "fits in RAM" dataframe backend, but I think it just lacks in usability and integratedness with the wider Julia ecosystem. Or rather, the wider ecosystem isn't as mature in key data analysis areas.

In particular, as you mention, plotting is one of the evolving parts of the ecosystem. Plots.jl is fine, Makie is powerful but very DIY, and AoG is slick but unwieldy. ggplot2 is far from perfect, but it works so well due to its maturity and integration with the rest of the Tidyverse.

In my ideal world, there would be a DataFrames.jl wrapper to provide nice (not just nicer like the two DFM.jl packages) syntax, and a powerful high-level plotting package (Makie is powerful but syntax is low level, Plots is mid on both) which is heavily integrated with the wrapper package.

Admittedly, I'm not a data scientist (anymore) so I don't follow the new developments in the dataviz scene much. If something like this exists then I would love to find it.

I wonder what my ideal syntax would look like anyway. Maybe something close to Tidyverse but with symbols as column names `:col_name` for ambiguity reasons.
Yeah. currently experiencing that in very much clear terms.
I forget the calculations, but there would have to be like hundreds of thousands of these ships at all times with millions of crew to make a dent the cargo carried in container ships.
I do disagree with this. It is ok I guess to make these convoluted, half-assed products if the cash flow is fine, but remember you will forever future pay a cost here for increased maintenance and for complicating the next feature.
It's kind of odd that a small microcontroller IC costs less than a LEGO brick. As if injection molding is a more expensive process than semiconductor fabbing.
Nobody said it would be. Did your RTFA? It's just a milestone crossed.
I had that issue and what you need to do is either fully restore ChromeOS by burning a restore USB stick (Mac/windows follow these steps: https://support.google.com/chromebook/answer/1080595?hl=en or on Linux can run this script: https://dl.google.com/dl/edgedl/chromeos/recovery/linux_reco... ). Then once you have chrome os back you can get it in developer mode, unlock the firmware, etc (mrchromebox has instructions).

Alternatively you can use gallium OS' fix flags USB recovery stick as an alternative to restoring chrome os: https://galliumos.org/fixflags/README and the images https://galliumos.org/fixflags/ ). This acts like a chrome os restore stick but instead of reinstalling chrome os it flips on the legacy bios bits so you can install a Linux OS and then run mrchromebox's firmware flash.

Ultimately you'll need to fix your internal drive though to get something you can install onto first. You might go the official ChromeOS restore stick approach just to get it all back into a known good state, then experiment with blowing away the firmware to replace with coreboot.
Disclaimer: I know what I'm talking about.
It's extremely common for a "leak" to actually be fully intentional, but the organization in question just wants plausible deniability to mitigate legal/political/popular blowback.

In order to preserve plausible deniability, the leak will look genuine in all aspects that are easy to simulate. "Someone else did it" is easy to simulate. A better gauge would be to see if anyone is caught and punished. If so, it was probably a real leak.
Sorry for asking a stupid question.

How much Theseus do I need to ship before I can copyright it as my own?
Is there some threshold for how much of an AI generated work needs to be modified by "human creativity" prior to it being copyrightable?
My guess is a data center that heats a swimming pool.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/technology-649...
>The mature businesses dial up the greed when there is no competition and dial it down to crush threats. Once the threat is extinguished, up the dial goes again.

You’ve just described what is called “competition”. Having to lower prices to keep up with competitors.

Also, if there is a clear winning pattern of a single player takes all market, that’s super attractive to competitor investors because they only need to outlast your warchest.

What you’ve described is a very unstable game theoretic condition and it’s basically a non-issue everywhere in the US except for markets with regulatory capture (i.e. high government regulation).

I challenge you to point out an example of a one grocery-store city where that strategy has worked to keep competitors out.
The trust is not just banning unsafe, it is using a limited std:

> The "trusted" version of PL/Rust uses a unique fork of Rust's std entitled postgrestd when compiling LANGUAGE plrust user functions.

https://github.com/tcdi/postgrestd
Even if it's not likely to happen, I can imagine that the USA actually stopping AI research due to safety concerns would probably make China sit up and take notice, for example. If it takes an international agreement, then the rational thing to do is to work toward that. Maybe it will not happen fast enough and humanity is doomed already, but it's worth trying.

"Mitigating harm" isn't really meaningful when you're talking about a super intelligence, I think. Once it is smart enough and out of the box, you are out of options to mitigate anything.

I think at this point, the 2 effective things one can do are to learn enough about why AI risk is a thing to have educated conversations about it, and talk about it as much as possible to anyone who will listen. Write articles, call your congresspeople, get this into the national and hopefully international discussion. It's good that we can point to a lot of smart people involved in AI research as already having expressed these concerns.

One mild ray of hope is that, unlike something like climate change where you can believe climate change is happening but also believe that due to having a privileged position of wealth you won't really be personally affected by it, with existential AI risk, there's no buying your way out of the issue. If you understand it and believe in the risk, you know that it's the same risk for everyone, from a third world villager without electricity to Bezos and Musk. It's just a matter of convincing enough powerful people of the urgency of the problem.

For me personally, I'm trying to get through the grieving process early, as well, and move on to the productive acceptance phase.
When did Apple ever pretend to care about supporting unions?
Meet my darling
https://gist.github.com/firatsarlar/5f25ebcc4c33ec484e6cd95b...
We need to - pure - clear non commercial, non owned AI first.
It -hope lets say-, no, most of us still guessing, sniffin, ... suspicions abut who own GPT -LLM we need to abstract-,
Who owns this - so called - open source product?
MS - with the power of NVIDA's - ?
OpenAI people?
Why cant we talk our intentions, or whose product, or not to generalize it As LLMs.
Because, lets say public, - and our ignore our delusions about the thing we made-, because, we're in a delusion, what is this ?
People could try to eat and sue some, do we - purely - care for public.
I need to skip my own experience, but, yes, if you ready to be delusional ,
you could easily make LLM your girlfriend, a liar, ...
No, we - software community - need to stop and see what we have.
We name it, public shape it, some abuse it for money that it made me ... , and sue some ...
What is the end product ?
A constant, machine - lets say system -, working to make this happen.
Justice, we - devs-, world, ... money, people, puclic , we 're spendng time and resources a thing. Some claim its mine, yes, we need a concencuss ?
No. Open source is the only thing if we - pure - lets say.
I do not want to waste my time to figure out poke FB's LLM, or -pleae Open - AI
girl.
Lets learn to share, at least for us -devs-
I'm really tired to think commercial facts of this thing.
I'm really tired to this game we play.
MS, say I have it, and make it yours.
Boy - sorry open AI- I do not know you, is it yours, MS's ,
FB, they somehow managed to make a thing - inter-national, in Paris -
Skip gaslighting, delusions what you own ?

Are we really there ?
Quite the opposite, EY as an aidotor has, and is supposed to het, access to any financially relevant data, documents and transactions they need to their job. That includes, among other things, invoices to customers, suppliers, inventory data and transactions, bank statements, credit card data, contracts with clients and suppliers and so on and so forth. That is actually part of a financial auditors job and responsibility. Yryong to minimize data access is exactly what Wirecard did, and EY accepted for some reason. Which absolutely not normal, it is in fact a major red flag.
I think C-h l (lossage) shows the keys and function names.
Wow. That's crazy.

Genuine question: is this actually useful in real life, or just a cool "because I could" project?

Not being a Julia programmer I'd assume that producing charts in a REPL would be done in a Jupyter notebook with real pixels, not Unicode.

Is producing elaborate charts in a terminal something people actually need?

Edit: some fantastic responses. Makes perfect sense. Thank you!
Price stickiness is a well studied area of behavioral economics.
Not if they and managers follow the law on discrimination in the workplace.
From 20 years now on everyone will drive a car so everyone will be a car mechanic!

-some guy who was wrong about cars in 1980 probably-
Coffee is the perfect product for this because the farmers get paid peanuts and the actual coffee is sold to customers at like 1000x higher price, so there's probably a lot of room to pay a premium for "green logistics" while still making a tidy profit
As a teacher I used to tithe to my classroom. It drove my coworkers and bosses nuts that I had everything I could want and they were fighting over whiteboard markers. I could tell who the crooked administrators were because they would say "Give me the 10% and I'll spend it better than you can" or "We'll deduct 10% from your pay check and use that for the district; same thing."

Now that I am between jobs and interviewing, I am tithing to my local church.

I may go back to tithing to my classroom soon.
What I find interesting is that something can suddenly get a lot of media attention once it has a catchy name to describe it, like "quiet quitting".

I suspect it's not a recent phenomenon, just that it was recently given a name that is perfect for attention-grabbing headlines.

It just goes to show you the power of naming things.
I completely agree with chasers's points. Moreover, Elixir's excellent concurrency support and its fault-tolerant nature make it well-suited for handling a high number of connections, ensuring our connection pooler's reliability.
Oh, no I didn't talk about the "mythical builders" I talked about the actual builders.

The crypo space has become very big in the past two cycles but every techie should be easily able to pick a decentralized chain, look at its community and identify those who build from those who grift.
I think it's safe to say that it really didn't become a popular hobby, from that 90s perspective.
Anything is a fireable offense if you're at-will. A termination like that is not likely to hold up in better jurisdictions.
Limited ability to raise capital
> why they're filling in with the f-22 stopgap until a true next gen air superiority fighter arrives

The sort of combat where an F-22 would outfight an F-35 is somewhere between extremely rare and obsolete. Add to that the massive costs of running the F-22, and the balance shifts to having more F-35s and armament over a luxury squad of F-22s.
I don't see any Cosine being mentioned in the proof. I don't see any circular logic here.
How We Think About Copyright and AI Art
Note that when a = b we have an equilateral triangle, with area a^2/2.

Draw a line from the 90 degree angle to side c, bisecting the 90 degree angle into two 45 degree angles. This divides the original triangle into two smaller triangles.

From the fact that the sum of the interior angles of a triangle is 180 degrees, it is not hard to see that the two smaller triangles are both equilateral, with sides of a, c/2, and c/2, and the angle between their two c/2 sides is 90 degrees.

That gives c^2/8 for the area of each of the smaller triangles, or c^2/4 for the area of the original triangle which we know to be a^2/2. So c^2/4 = a^2/2 or c^2 = 2 a^2 = a^ + a^2.
Macron wants whatever will allow him to sell weapons to Russia and China again
Alternatively just use jump hosts: $(ssh -J bastion target)
Right. Most of the fine-tuned models we've seen so far have been by university teams.

Meta is not being very selective here. I applied for the download myself and got the links after two days (using a university email address).
Just wanted to show that requirements being not directly reflected in code doesn't mean that they can't be tested against;

Further investigation certainly makes sense
Fact check: How can I spot AI-generated images?
Workers don't exactly decide to collectivize in situations where the status quo is comfortable and they already feel like their voices are heard. It's almost a sense of "if there isn't a workplace democracy we'll make it one".

If anything an adversarial relationship with upper management precludes attempts to organize as it implies they failed their boots on the ground in some way and the problems got so fad they felt there was absolutely zero "internal" channels available to get the changes they want heard, let alone enacted.
It's not like this is alien technology. You park the boat along a pier and you hoist a crane over it. There are a lot of ships that still need to use ports that are not cargo ships. Cargo ships are just one aspect of regular maritime traffic.
What does a research grant pay for?
For what it's worth, I've been working on a startup that involves training some models, and this is likely how we're going to be treating the legal stuff (and being very careful about how customers can interact with the models as a consequence). I assume people who have different incentives will take a different view, though.
You could put it that way. I haven’t encountered many people who “hate cancel culture” but are upset about what happened to Colin Kaepernick, even though it seems plain enough to me that he lost his job for expressing a political view. I’m sure they could invent a distinction when challenged on this but I don’t think it would rise above post hoc reasoning.
Paper Please too.
It's amazing that 25 years from the halloween documents, and 20 years on from http://mslinux.org/, that's the case.

Also amazing how much of mslinux.org is true

Internet Integration -- well yes every machine has an ip stack

More Swap Space -- apparently swap is a good thing for performance

new type-ahead command-line features -- sounds a little like copilot

Graphical Point-And-Click RPM Management -- certainly what desktop linux has

Plug-and-Play For Linux devices which make adding and removing peripherals a snap -- well yes, things like udev

crapd -- insert pottering based commentary

The space vehicle will be running our newest product, SpacePod 2004 -- in reality it's linux that tends to run on mars

Microsoft is working to incorporate the well known "Start" button from the Windows Platform into X Windows' Gnome interface -- I believe Start has been removed from Windows now? I have something very similar in the top corner of my xfce screen though
I think the key here is that, given the way that Meta distributed the model, a leak was inevitable. So while they may not have directly orchestrated a leak it must have been an intended result.
> The nonsense end result of that line of logic is that you return a single boolean that corresponds to failure/success, so I assume that's not what you mean.

I frequently find that is all that is necessary, and is exactly the correct solution, not "nonsense" whatsoever. Perhaps even that boolean is overkill: an unrecoverable bug should perhaps instead log and then terminate, producing no error condition for the caller of your library to worry about attempting to recover from whatsoever. Detailed error reporting can be done without obscenely distinct error types, and in fact detailed error reporting frequently benefits from a focus on the task itself instead of trying to structure data to leave the task of actually reporting the error to someone else, and kicking the can down the road.

E.g. for parsing focused errors like this I'd be more interested in pretty printing the source line in question, underlining the error, etc. - I wrote https://github.com/MaulingMonkey/json-spanned-value for helping ease the display of bad JSON data in a manner that integrates with your IDE for ease of fixing said data by jumping directly to the cause.

And then, admittedly, there are times when different errors should be recovered from differently. When the caller might wish to retry an operation after some errors, try a different operation after other, report file+line+range information for yet other errors, etc. - these have very concrete answers to "What do you expect the user of your library to do with this detailed information?" that are not difficult to answer at all.

> Contrast the two error messages:

Both are UTF8 strings without types adding anything obviously useful. A silly demo screenshot of errors that will open the offending document if closed, and navigate to the line/column of said error:

https://github.com/MaulingMonkey/json-spanned-value/blob/mas...

Which operates by immediately dumping the "errors" to terminal without any error types involved whatsoever... nor even a boolean branch! Well, a real program might set a boolean so the CLI knows to exit(1) instead of using partially parsed data...
It's a little hard to see this as more than a pet project to have a beautiful ship given that it's not carrying containers. I wonder how long it takes to load and unload...

There is a plan to eventually build a container sailboat [0], but it's just a rendering. I could be wrong, but I'm getting strong "just ~~give us your money~~ invest and we'll totally spend it on container ships" vibe.

I don't like sound too negative and would love to be wrong.

https://www.sailcargo.inc/future-fleet
Eh, framework is a bit strong (if we're thinking about something like Ruby on Rails). You can easily mix dplyr and lubricate with base R things like for loops, subscripted assignments, low-level functions like grep, etc. I do it all the time.

I agree that nonstandard evaluation can be tricky, but the nice notation you get is worth it IMHO, and at this point you can switch to standard evaluation in a number of convenient ways. My favorite way is to just use base R temporarily, since outside of modeling functions it mostly works by standard eval.

And I think that's good advice in general. The best way to use the Tidyverse is to use it for what it's good at. And for things it's not so good at, use something else for a bit before coming back to it.
They have tacitly endorsed the leak. https://github.com/facebookresearch/llama/pull/73#issuecomme...
This. The EU prides itself in being the 'regulatory superpower'.

Now the EU gets GDPR, while the US gets GPT-4. I cannot think of any influential EU AI companies, except for DeepL. While even the UK has two (Deepmind, Stability). I cannot see a more damning indictment of EU's tech policy than this.

But this seems to be the future that Europeans want, aging, resentful of changes, yet somehow mass importing immigrants to serve the pensioners. Italy now has 50% GDP per capita compared to the US, I think it'll end up being 33% by 2050.