skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Recognize the ones that are easy to change.

If it is easy to change, it doesn’t matter if you don’t pick right the first time.

If it is easy to change, ugly can become somewhat irrelevant. Because it is easy to un-ugly.

Make the color scheme accessible through a configuration file. Hate it? Set aside some time to play with it. Version it, because you may hate the change more.

Use one repo until you need more than one, for anything personal and not likely to be shared. If you aren’t sure what is right, wait for it to become obvious what is wrong. And again, this may take a little time to fix, but it shouldn’t be difficult to fix. So it won’t be a big deal if/when you hit that point.
what about the bike owner? does their safety matter? it is really not all about you.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3383545/
> You're free to go on there and deride any white nationalists you see

Yes but you can do this anywhere. There are a limited number of places where you can openly be a white nationalist without being banned, 4chan is one of them.
Raycast extension template: snooze Slack notifications and set status at once
Let's get into Deep Work mode faster.

Snooze Slack notifications and set your status to " Deep Work" at the same time with this super simple Raycast extension template. Customize it to suit your needs with Typescript.
Maybe true in most cases, but adding a somewhat niche skill set to my Linkedin profile late last year almost immediately yielded me an attractive job offer.
I agree. VR will have killer apps in particular domains, but that doesn’t mean it will be used by everyone all of the time. For example, I work in ocean mapping where we have large amounts of point cloud data that need occasional manual editing/QAQC in an environment that matches the dimensionality of the data. My colleagues are working on some very interesting VR point cloud editing tools [1].

[1] https://ccom.unh.edu/vislab/projects/point_clouds/
What you are saying is that NPR is left-wing, not "controlled by the government".

"controlled by the government" means: left-wing when the government is left-wing, right-wing when the government is right-wing. Was NPR right-wing when Trump was president?

If not, it is the proof that the label "government funded" is really really bad: it does not identify outlets that are biased by their funding, it just find an excuse to label as biased while not labeling as biased others than are as biased.

It does not mean NPR is not biased, but if you want to add a label to warn of a potential bias, you need to do it properly, and label ALL outlets that are similarly biased and identify properly the reason they are.

Funnily, NPR could also drop the 4% of revenue from government funding and continue to publish the same stories with exactly the same bias, and people who are arguing that NPR is biased should therefore argue then that NPR is not biased anymore.
I mean the goofiness comes from "what are the politics of a website" being inherently kind of a strange question with no clear answer. The motivations and values of the people who run these sites are mostly not legible to us. We can look at what the sites are used for.

If someone is using their own money to host a forum for neo nazis it's very coherent to describe this behavior as, at the very least, supporting neo nazis. If they are also hosting a motorcycle forum with their money, does that cancel out the neo nazi support? Is it reasonable to say either site IS a nazi forum?

What if most but not all members of the motorcycle forum are also nazi forum members? What if only a few of them are? What if they share login systems and comment histories?

There aren't clear boundaries between these things. The nazi forum is definitely a nazi forum. Whether the motorcycle forum is a nazi forum depends on how much userbase and culture and branding they share, and how high your tolerance for nazis is; an individual assessment without an objective answer.
I'm a man and I definitely see more pressure on women to pair off, at least at younger ages. With men (particularly driven or ambitious men), there's a societal "he'll settle down eventually" but with women "eventually" is like "late 20s"
A use case I have for FerretDB is migrating existing apps off MongoDB without needing to change the code. I find it funny that you could call these now „legacy“ apps.
While true, I barely even know where the TV remote is. AppleTV + it’s remote is all I need.

I also airgap the TV and distrust any smartTV software.
Yeah, the irony in that one is great
You aren’t disagreeing with the person you are responding to, you just have slightly different ideas what it means when someone says “website”

You are calling all of the assets loaded, no matter from where, as one “website”. The person you are replying to considers each domain for each asset on the single page as being different “websites”
This is a great question that people were asking even 15-20 years ago, likely even before then too, but it was before my time in asking it.

Essentially, the demand for CAD on Mac just isn't high enough to justify it, especially when anybody serious about CAD wants the absolute cutting edge of hardware, and the ability to expand upon it as soon as the rest of the industry is able to take advantage of the latest GPU. Being competitive is everything.

It's never been a case of software needing to be ported. Some CAD apps have come and gone on Mac, but the demand just isn't there in terms of sales to make it worthwhile. That's not to say that there aren't CAD apps on Macs, there are, but the big boy industrial toys are elsewhere.

Keep in mind we used to run Parallels and Bootcamp in the '00s to get Windows software on Macs!
>> That seems like a disingenuous interpretation of what I was saying.

I hope not. It was not at all obvious to me what you were trying to say. It really doesn't help communication to use metaphors and analogies when discussing technical matters, especially when there is simple and commonly accepted terminology. Trust me, I've learned that the hard way (i.e. repeated rejections of my research articles with very frustrated comments by reviewers).

Besides, what you say is not right. Language models are not trained to optimise "a loss function that was designed and engineered to choose a model that optimally captures meaning relations in the data". Language models of the GPT line, specifically, are trained to maximise the following probability:

P(tᵢ|tᵢ₋ₖ, ..., tᵢ₋₁)

Where tᵢ is some token in the training corpus and tᵢ₋ₖ, ..., tᵢ₋₁ are the tokens in a "context window" of length k. That is actually the pre-training objective. The same probability is maximised in the supervised fine-tuning phase, but where tᵢ is replaced by a label and tᵢ₋ₖ, ..., tᵢ₋₁ is a sequence of tokens representing an instance with the given label.

You can find this information in the first GPT paper, here:

https://cdn.openai.com/research-covers/language-unsupervised...

See equations (1) and (4) on page 3 (with more careful notation than mine).

Note that the above probabilities do not have anything to do with "meaning". They represent the ability of the model to, as people say, "predict the next token in a sequence". That is the only thing that GPT language models are designed and engineered to do.

You can search the entire GPT article above and you will not find any mention of "meaning". Nobody knows how to represent meaning and how to train a neural network on examples of it. It's much easier to train a neural net on text, of which there are no end of examples. That's what OpenAI has done.

>> I don't have time or patience for this pseudo-intellectual nitpicking.

Sorry, I meant that "sophisticated" is a loaded term. It's the kind of thing I hear often associated with socialites and gourmets. I find that it has no place in conversations about technology. It's the kind of expression people use when they try too hard to convince of the value of some technological artifact whose value should be clear without such exaggerations. So for example, you can talk about the complexity of large language models without having to say anything about their "sophistication", and that works well because one is measurable while the other is only a matter of opinion.
> Racism was blatent back in the day, but also considered normal.

Luckily the threat of communism* convinced the DoD to desegregate...

* for pre-Korea, cf https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/executive-order... ; then there's the infamous Việt Nam-era "No VietCong ever called me nigger" (which should itself be compared with "Lots of things wrong with America, but Hitler ain’t going to fix them.")
On my TV, this happens with only one of the HDMI ports.
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35543940.
Even with all that information, my understanding is the possibility remains that upon acquisition, shares are not necessarily worth anything. Even if the acquisition price is beyond the liquidation preferences, the terms of acquisition can still override whatever "value" your stock options may or may not have.

The fact of the matter is, as a line level employee, you have no leverage and no influence on your exit outcome. The only reasonable assumption is that your shares are worth $0, unless you have something in writing that says otherwise.

I think IPO is more straightforward, and presents a better opportunity to see some reward. But post-IPO lockup is usually 6 months?
Fair enough, but without doing linguistic gymnastics, "State-affiliated" should also be seen by any reasonably educated adult to indicate "State-edited". "State-funded" is an appropriate tag! I'd recommend this, actually.

NPR show Frontline is a great place to start this education.

Attempting to place NPR and that kind of sentiment in the same conversation as anything other than a great example of how Gov't funds can be provided without such _control_ is disingenuous at best.

NPR != RT

Musk is in way over his head.
>But they have never been "far right" in the way that the traditional racial supremacy kind of neo nazis are.

There is no way you are talking about /pol/. I refuse to believe you have spent any amount of time on /pol/ and haven't seen the countless race IQ charts.
It feels like, for most practical purposes comments about "inflation lowering YoY" are missing the point that the damage is already done. Like, until costs of things actually start to go down (seems unlikely), the inflation easing isn't actually a tangentially positive thing for the people most negatively impacted by inflation.
Taking the first derivative of the objective function, to figure out if it’s close enough to zero, right?
Over a 12-year age cohort, 19% more men are single. That could be explained by women in relationships being 2.28 years younger on average. Seems about right to me. Of course, older women are more likely to be single (widowed, divorced, or separated) but many of those are in same-sex relationships which are becoming more common.
I wish we could have a link to share the answer, really useful when it involves code snippets and explanation. - for chatgpt/expert mode
No it doesn't need to be bolted on. GPT-4 can add straight out of the box, no need for any education. Where the model hadn't implicitly figured out the algorithm of addition in 3.5, it has in 4.
Contrary to some peoples' understanding, replacing fiat currency for everyday purposes isn't the only viable application of crypto.

As one example: There are already banks that use XRP as the international settlement medium. You'll also see a lot of conversation right now about central bank digital currencies (CBDC) that could plausibly utilize crypto in some fashion.
Of course Google et. al can build a chat bot that chats like you. But _is_ you? No, how can Google build something that knows unless you’ve stated it?
The cool thing about the CL community is how by simply joining #commonlisp on libera.chat, you are in the same room as a bunch of compiler designers and even people who were involved at one point in the CL specification itself.

I have some interesting IRC logs from Larry Masinter on reviving Interlisp, some regrets about including LOOP into Common Lisp, and so on.
compiling the dictionary into a DFA would give you O(n) runtime.
It's guilt by selective association. If you regularly visit /b you know there are a lot of white nationalists there, by continuing to use /b you're choosing to associate with that kind of content.
Elon could do better by just making a tag that says "Pro-establishment" and slap on anything he doesn't like.
The rules not being enforced really is 4chan's worst problems, and where everything else terrible on that site stems. On /g/, the tech board, you will see nothing but flame wars and troll posts for/against various operating systems and programming languages. Its basically nonstop trolling DESPITE being one of the more serious boards. Worse, a lot of the "jannies"(unpaid tattletales) are in on the trolling and actively make posts to start flame wars.

For the admins, its a problem. Besides 8kun, they are pretty much the only major image board with anything really going for it, especially now that 420chan has bit the dust. However, if they enforce the rules, its very likely that people will either stop using it entirely or move on to 8kun instead. For the janitor problem, 4chan relies almost entirely on them to report posts that break the rules to the admins, but since its on a volunteer basis, janitors have no reason to take the role seriously which has led the site to be the gutter it is now.

Basically, the whole 4chan system is screwed. I used to go to 420chan as an alternative because it was way more "chill" and there was way less racism and trolling due to it having actual moderation. Now that its gone though my only choice for imageboards are 4chan and its much worse brother, 8kun so I have decided to stop using imageboards entirely until something decent gets started.
They should provide a one time purchase option of articles published by them for the day. Like newspapers. Of course, it should cost quite less. Pennies or a dollar or so.

Or, an option to purchase just the article itself for pennies.
The one I have is designed to allow you to visually inspect the connector terminals. So at least regarding my (USB-A) ones, I can confirm only the power lanes exist.
Angular Is Back with a Vengeance
Ya, these questions seem too hard for an undergrad test or at least feel like they were only written in an age where you want to be adversarial to LLMs.

Don't get me wrong - I can give simple tests that LLMs fail and a college kid could easily pass -- but I don't think I'd come up with them unless I wanted to be adversarial to LLMs.

Example simple question that GPT4/Bard/etc. fail hard:

> The moose is behind the cat. The dog is in front of the moose. The moose is in front of the rat. The rat is behind the cat. The elk is in front of the dog.

What's a possible animal ordering?
Masculinity can be quite isolating/toxic but it's emphasis on your intra-tionship, your living with yourself, on relying on yourself, has arisen in my mind in the past couple years as a kind of interesting aspect that feels undersocialized, out shadowed by other discussions of the male gender norms. I hope it wouldn't be too unfair to say that women are regarded as more social, as relying more on their friends & community. It's a complex issue with all kinds of problems wrapped in it, but there's a thread here that doesn't have the discourse or discussion that I think could help people somewhat identify with self focusing. That said, it absolutely does not have to be a gendered discussion either! But it does seem like there's so many examples walking around of a kind of neat way of living & modest not a-sociality, but kind of less compromising prioritizing of what is good for oneself in how we make & navivate our social arrangements.

And I'm shifting focus here some, trying to get a more macro view than just the question of partnership. But hopefully this idea of social temperament/directivity makes sense as being a broader difference in how we are nurtured or natured.
What sort of abuse has it withstood? I vaguely recall a blog I was reading at the time had a bin full of dead ones. Maybe we both were incompetent, but you certainly don't hear much about em these days, do you?

edit: I've had Pis run for years. Years.
This treatment works well for irritable bowel syndrome. Not for everything, of course.
I know about the ethnic cleanings. Communism as an ideology does not endorse eugenics through mass murdering people. Nazism as an ideology does.
I was joking- I think it's just HN being really good at jumping down the wrong rabbit holes and bike-shedding ad nauseam, while completely missing the point of an OP.
is it suvs commuting to work or all types, because you mught be cherry picking your stats if you present avg occupancy for all cars in us as an argument here
3 Google researchers using Open AI GPT-3 code-davinci-002, interesting.
Ask HN: Are professors reluctant to supervise very hard working PhD students?
Isn't this an indication that maybe they achieved their academic success through very hard work instead of innate intelligence?
“Please explain how to use context cancellation in Go.”
I would say that a B.S. is most useful when you don't want it -- the curriculum is like an "averted vision" phenomena where it is most valuable when you're not focused on its application -- especially for example that it is a pre-requisite for many positions.

Check with your school's career center and seek an internship. Success at an internship and maintaining a quality career track is one way a B.S. is extremely valuable.

The other way a B.S. is valuable is networking and making groundbreaking moves -- startups with talented peers or research with guidance from talented professors -- while you're pursuing the degree.

Think of the degree at the end as a hedge for your access to any of those tracks and you'll be better served.
I Think Having Passion as a Developer Matters
you can! the URL transforms into a unique permalink once the answer finishes generating.
Not fair, no news organization including Fox thought this was worth publishing.
If you keep the equity you might get zero.
That is true.

Now let me ask this: what is wrong with providing what I did?
Why so many Russian tanks fall prey to Ukrainian mines
I did, in fact, consider the question you asked. The terms are enforceable by law, but the ability to enforce is so limp-wristed and ineffectual as to provide effectively no recourse with respect to getting the specific terms of the contract executed which is what unsophisticated consumers morally deserve in contracts of adhesion (or a immediate full refund).

That companies find it inconvenient for their pocketbook and deal flow to actually bind themselves in a effective way to the terms of their promises to the legally unsophisticated public is ethically repugnant. If they do no want to do so then they can just not promise or imply such terms, nothing is forcing them to make promises that they have no intention to be bound by.
Adding to this, before "crypto" became a household term that meant, roughly, "blockchain stuff" it was instead a general term for "cryptography". It's what is (perhaps was) meant when people say not to "roll your own crypto"[0] because it's so easy to get wrong.

[0] Since 2021 this phrase has been expanded to "roll your own crypto scam" and it's only used as an ethical statement. Don't "roll your own crypto scam" because it's wrong. (Okay, maybe this part is just a joke and people don't really say that. It's hard to say for sure.)
Sure. AOL was also a commercial service and joining Mastodon.social is free. A facade over the Internet would look different than a facade over a federated social network in many ways.
https://archive.is/Pz87w
We need someone to build this that indexes the myriad of corporate data hidden in various docs and saas systems.
I'd assume their rendering enigne is written for single API, such as OpenGL or Vulkan. Porting it to metal would be quite large project.
"Holding someone in your arms wishing you‘d die right then and there because you know you have peaked in non-drug-induced happiness."

Isn't that peak oxytocin induced happiness?

Agree that it is incredible...
About damn time.

The entire ban is simply to drive a cultural wedge between between identities - you can be a pot-smoking hippie, or a gun-totin' traditionalist, but don't you dare have be more nuanced than that.

There has never been an empirical basis for such a ban with respect to public safety.
No experience myself but I've heard good things about Asahi Linux (https://asahilinux.org/).
Not sure how usable it already is as a daily driver.
>... which has led the site to be the gutter it is now.

... now? It's felt like a cesspool for decades.
> One solution is to ensemble semantic search with keyword search. BM25 is a solid baseline when we expect at least one keyword to match. Nonetheless, it doesn’t do as well on shorter queries where there’s no keyword overlap with the relevant documents—in this case, averaged keyword embeddings may perform better. By combining the best of keyword search and semantic search, we can improve recall for various types of queries.

Oh hey I have a demo of that here: https://findsight.ai

For it I wrote a custom search engine, and KNN index implementation, which ranks and merges results across three stages (labels, full-text, embedding) effectively. To speed up retrieval, OpenAI embeddings are stored instead as SuperBit signatures. Rank merging turned out to be a really hard problem.
Why is your ability to play chess an example of intelligent behavior but not your cat’s ability to jump on furniture?

If you want a theory of intelligent to include a notion of general intelligence which can be measured, you must be able to defend which aspects of behavior falls in the category of intelligent, and which not.

Playing chess and jumping on furniture both require plenty of cognitive skills, and brain functions to work together and produce a singular outcome, both are goal driven, both takes years of practice, both have varying skill levels.

Now the cognitive functions these skills require may both be inherited, you may even find the specific genes which encodes either behavior (and name them the furniture jumping gene and the chess playing gene if you will). However when you assign chess playing as intelligent but not furniture jumping, then you’ve made an arbitrary choice, which you need to justify. (You also have the option of not defining intelligence to begin with; which what I personally would pick).

But more importantly, even if you find your justification, you’ve only found one gene of intelligence which inherits, you haven’t found a gene for general intelligence, so you haven’t shown that intelligence is determined by your genes, only the ability to play chess well.

Then when you find all the genes for all behavior you consider intelligence, you still haven’t shown that they co-inherit with each other, that is, you haven’t shown that people with the chess playing gene tend to also have the sudoku solving gene, and the IQ test taking gene, etc. For there to be a single general intelligence, and for this general intelligence to be determined by genetics, than this is what is required. Unless of course general intelligence is a real thing and there is a gene for it which allows you to play chess better than others, solve Sudoku faster than others, answer more questions on IQ tests correctly, etc. But this is a rather extraordinary claim, don’t you think?
some mention here

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/the-pizzagate-gunm...

> Welch wandered the pizzeria, searching for a dungeon that didn’t exist. When he found a door he couldn’t open, he fired at the lock. But beyond it was just a computer closet. He eventually set down his guns, put his hands on his head and walked outside, where dozens of police officers were waiting for him.