skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
ARM offers the same possibility but there's like one SoC that's fully transparent.
This is why tech bro culture persist.
Must be a slow news day at Hackaday. This is doomsday speculation about something interesting, based on someone else's YouTube video about a signal marker.

The Russian Military transmits a constant signal to prevent anyone else from taking up residence on that frequency and it also allows receivers to ensure they are on the right frequency while waiting for a message broadcast at a specific time.
Ask HN: What are some of the best blog posts by software engineers?
Blog posts on any topic:

Algorithms

Networking

Databases

Programming Languages

.......
There was no such thing as a "local language" there. They spoke a very wide variety of language - one article collected 40 different languages spoken there.

Mandatory Palestine was not a country at that time, and had nothing unifying it.

The reason all those migrants switched to Hebrew is that it was the only common tongue among all of them.

Why in the world would they pick a European language? If anything maybe Yiddish, but as you write there were lots of people from Arab countries who didn't speak it.

But everyone knew Hebrew. It's really the only language that made sense. And it was not extinct, everyone knew it. Maybe it wasn't their cradle language, but everyone could make themselves understood in it.

You have this weird subtext that the place was Arab and Jews came in - that's not accurate at all, Jews never left Israel (Palestine). The migrants joined existing Jews.
pg_gpt: Postgres extension to generate SQL queries from natural language
pg_gpt is a postgres extension that uses OpenAI's GPT-3 API to generate SQL queries from natural language. It can also explain SQL queries and query plans in natural language.
The free version of cloudflare is essentially a "fair-use" offering, meaning that it is free until they decide its no longer free for you at their sole discretion [0]. Their terms of service prohibits distribution of any "disproportionate percentage" of non-HTML content [1]. That includes most of what you would want a CDN for: video, images, audio, binaries.

They have exercised this discretion repeatedly for significant bandwidth users, usually in the form of "You need to upgrade to the enterprise plan or we will terminate services for your site." One of my sites got the enterprise "offer" after serving single digit TB in a month. Running on a real CDN from the start would have been cheaper than inevitably getting extorted to a large <contact sales> price for <contract term> or terminated with little to no time to migrate things.

[0] Section 2.6 https://www.cloudflare.com/terms/
[1] Section 2.8 https://www.cloudflare.com/terms/
Twitter is now recommending Kremlin-linked accounts
Also, from Britannica^0:

In July 1518, a woman whose name was given as Frau (Mrs.) Troffea (or Trauffea) stepped into the street and began dancing. She seemed unable to stop, and she kept dancing until she collapsed from exhaustion. After resting, she resumed the compulsive frenzied activity. She continued this way for days, and within a week more than 30 other people were similarly afflicted. They kept going long past the point of injury. City authorities were alarmed by the ever-increasing number of dancers. The civic and religious leaders theorized that more dancing was the solution, and so they arranged for guildhalls for the dancers to gather in, musicians to accompany the dancing, and professional dancers to help the afflicted to continue dancing…”

Hahaha

^0: https://www.britannica.com/event/dancing-plague-of-1518
I think this is the biggest thing. Universities have to report all of these things separately - private industry gets to tuck it into things. Having seen the comparative rates for private research companies...they're not cheaper than universities. Not by a long shot.
Here is a cutaway drawing of a toroidal tokamak for reference. It still has a relatively small center pillar.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:JET_cutaway_drawing_...
You don't have enough details to give a good bit of advice. Even if there were 10k words, still the same.

Without knowing a single thing about you or your situation, I feel comfortable saying not to do it. That's not sustainable, nor is it healthy.

Sunk cost.
> last updated 2023-03-19

Yep, anything that old is ancient in the AI world
Part of the breakthrough with LLMs has precisely been about encoding nothing at all about language and letting the transformer figure it out from scratch.

We don't know what is necessary for learning language.
If the site is both static and busy enough, then the majority of users never need to do a roundtrip to the original server.

If the site isn’t busy enough… well, I think more CDNs ought to support pre-caching. Supposedly Vercel does?
Meaning only insofar as can be observed from the context of the word. I don't think it's reasonable to call that "meaning" in and of itself.
This is a good start, but I think it expects to be used in a little bit too structured of a way. One of the benefits of GPT is that you can be a bit loose with the format. Rather than setting up my tools to properly pipe errors into this, I think I'd get better results by just copy/paste into a GPT chat.
It’s pretty clear these issues were beyond what traditional support was capable of. If you had reached out to someone like Lee earlier it’s likely your experience would have been much better

Vercel’s definitely in a weird place, trying to be the home for innovation while also offering more traditional support. While the support experience you had was less than ideal, you’re also failing to recognize that you are bleeding edge a bit here.

Your reply here makes it really hard to take any of what you’ve done in good faith. Lee has been incredible to work with and I commend his efforts here
Singularity when? Plot twist:..
Sounds like talking to a kid (or any human being, really) about a complicated math homework problem. Making a kid say their reasoning step by step would increase accuracy.
At my university when you look at it as a whole, we barely break even on indirects.

While there is a lot of need to have a conversation about how the system currently functions, I'd suggest cutting indirects completely as step one is akin to suggesting flooding the room with carbon monoxide until we can sort out that nasty cough you have.
what does triangulate mean here? i'm guessing locate.
For some sound figures, see the 25 years of lithium production graphic here [1] Australia is responsible for twice the seperated end product as Chile which itself produces twice that of China (2021).

Half of Australias 55.4 ktonnes of production (REO) comes from Mt Weld ( 240,000 tonnes per annum of ore to produce up to 66,000 tonnes per annum of concentrate containing 26,500 tonnes of REO ) [2].

Mt Weld Australia ships its concentrate to the world’s largest single rare earths processing plant in Malaysia[3].

These figures rather undercut the assertion that:

> If you look at industry statistics, 90% of lithium refinement is done in China.

Can you link to the "industry statistics" that you are quoting? Thankyou.

[1] https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/01/chart-countries-produ...

[2] https://lynasrareearths.com/about-us/locations/mt-weld-weste...

[3] https://lynasrareearths.com/
I have taken it down, thanks for the advice. Definitely not worth taking risks. As someone who has struggled with mental health this is something that I built mainly for myself. I will keep it as a personal assistant.
> you would support the government making a blanket ban on all lies

In theory, this law, if perfectly applied, would not be incompatible with my view of free speech. In practice, such a law would be too broad, because determining whether something is true or not, and whether someone believes it or not, are hard problems that the justice system can't solve in general.

> It is certainly possible to frame opinions into those various categories.

It's possible to frame an opinion into any action, including straightforward murder. But no opinion requires an action in that group to express.

For the "it would be a shame if X" example, the crime is not the words or opinion. In fact, it's perfectly possible to use those same words legally, to express a genuine opinion that X would be bad! The crime is communicating a threat (which is not an opinion) via implication.
Why Software Patents Should Die: Part One
I don’t think Daly is suggesting to move away from debt as an instrument in his work, only to establish a 100% reserve system for commercial banks, including the Fed. He was suggesting to nationalize money supply via the Treasury, to avoid bank runs and fiascos like they happened just now to CS and SVB.

Apparently, this was already the direction of thought among some economists in the 1920s (like Frank Knight and Irving Fisher), but then got overruled by the eternal growth mindset that evolved during the Great Depression (which Daly claims leads to “uneconomic” growth). Printing money as an instrument should very much be available - but only to the Government/Treasury.
I don't think a LLM is the best judge in that case.
(Cont.) If you are of the opinion that weights are copyrightable, I encourage you to show how weights satisfy the requirements of copyright - particularly those concerning originality and human authorship - rather than silently downvoting comments you don't like. At least that way would - hopefully - result in a discussion that is far more informative for all of us.
Because different institutions have different needs. As a particular example, the Scripps Institute has an astonishingly high, >100% overhead rate, because in order to do their research, they need to be able to maintain research ships. Which are, unsurprisingly, very expensive.

Edit: Per the post below, this is incorrect - don't remember where this information lives in my head. But the general point remains the same - because different institutions will have different costs.
EPA was Nixon, so it skews towards pro big business raping the environment lately, but not always was that way.
> removing the possibility of phishing attacks

Doesn't autofill by a password manager already achieve this? It will not autofill on a fishing domain
First, this would be a far more interesting case for freedom of speech if the speaker was someone from a private think tank. Now it's effectively citizens vs. the government. With high-ranking government officials, it's often impossible to separate the person from the office.

Second, opinions are irrelevant. Everyone has them, and they are almost always worthless. Placing excessive value on opinions is the reason why we are in this endless quagmire of political polarization. The students disrupted the talk instead of arguing with the speaker, because they believed they have the right (rather than just the freedom) to express their opinions.

Freedom of speech is at its core the right to express politically actionable ideas. It protects those who reveal secrets the authorities would keep hidden, those who criticize the way things are done, and those who propose doing things in a different way. It allows citizens to debate matters and to make better, more informed decisions.

The freedom to express opinions is a trivial consequence.
Overhead also pays for people.
Probably tough for psych research, but trivially easy for biomedical research, which has one or two orders of magnitude more money involved.

HN loves to critique psych research without understanding that once you're above chemistry in the complexity hierarchy, these problems are everywhere.
I've taken it down. It was meant as a quick demo of how one might leverage GPT4 in this area but there's a risk posting here people might think it's a serious product.

From your comment however, you don't rule out applying AI in this field entirely?
It's obviously what's happening.

It's why:

1. GPT-3 can speak native-level french despite the language only being 1.8% of it's training corpus.

2. GPT-3 can follow instruction in other languages just fine despite the instruct tuning data being almost entirely in English.

3. LLMs trained on code demonstrably reason better.

It's fairly obvious pre-trained LLMs aren't really operating at just the word/token level.

Part of the breakthrough with LLMs has precisely been about encoding nothing at all about language and letting the transformer figure it out from scratch.

We don't know what is necessary for learning language. Whatever structure we would add at our current level of understanding would far more likely hamper progress than anything. It would also be extremely surface level which LLMs go far beyond.
I'm perplexed what the problem is here?

My partner works in grant management for a public r1.
I believe the rate the university gets is about .57.

That pays for facilities and education programs and funding the department itself. Bringing in money makes the university happy and your pay check bigger though the accounting on it sounds obnoxious and not always guaranteed (salary cuts to cover overruns, etc).

However if you think about it,
That's probably about how much private employees make for their employer anyways if not more. Annoying but hey that's the way the system is, you're getting paid to make someone else more money.
> This is why tech bro culture persist.

Because one person on the Internet interpreted a title as a double entendre and said so?
It's obviously what's happening lol.

It's why:

1. GPT-3 can speak native-level french despite the language only being 1.8% of it's training corpus.

2. GPT-3 can follow instruction in other languages just fine despite the instruct tuning data being almost entirely in English.

3. LLMs trained on code demonstrably reason better.

It's fairly obvious pre-trained LLMs aren't really operating at just the word/token level.
For me personally, I read a blog post about motivation — and a quite silly one at that. I was young and struggled a lot with ADHD and motivation in general. I had a hard time in school because I just physically couldn’t work on an assignment. I’d set it down in front of me and stare at it, unable to start. I had kinda decided that I wasn’t good at those sorts of things, which made it harder.

But I found this random post online one day which has some ideas about trying to do small annoying things for no reason, to train your brain to be better at doing hard things.

The blog gave an example: go on a walk, but go out of your way to take on a pointless task. Like at the beginning, set out to touch 50 flowers. Then go on your walk touching flowers. When you get to the end, you’ve gotten practice doing something that you didn’t want to and which was a bit annoying. But now you’ll have a bit more confidence to do something else in the future.

I got in a habit of taking on these pointless goals a lot for a few weeks. Eventually I was sitting down and looking at my homework, thinking “I spent two hours touching flowers for no reason, I can spend a few minutes doing this” and would make some progress.

Looking back it seems ridiculous, but it was the advice I needed at the time, and it actually helped me make some changes in life. That whole process made me get into a habit of thinking about the end goal & how small little steps can help you do big things. And actually practicing and seeing that, took me out of the headspace of “I can never do that” to “maybe I can”.

And more interesting, I wrote about this on a forum back then, and more than a month after writing it I received a message from someone who said “hey, I just wanted to let you know that I started doing the annoying-little-task strategy after reading your post, and I feel it’s helped me a lot so thank you”
The core issue is a series of failed policies originally implemented to address the problem of white women hanging around black and Chinese men. I don’t think the world would end if we sold Vyvanse and Nucynta ER over the counter at CVS. Let the people predisposed to be addicts just be addicts instead of wrecking their lives and the lives of those around them with failed program after failed program.
I work at LLNL so I work with people who make cool simulations all the time. The coolest ones I’ve seen lately were the ones that helped with last year’s big fusion ignition shot at NIF.

There is a (very) recent article summarizing how simulations contributed to ignition here: https://www.llnl.gov/news/computing-codes-simulations-helped.... Just reading about how many different simulation teams were involved and how many different types of physics had to be modeled to get that shot to work is awe-inspiring, at least for me. Optimizing target thickness, modeling plasma in the target, laser coupling at the entrance hole, etc. - there are a ridiculous number of things that had to be modeled, together, at very different scales.

The prior article describing how simulation contributed to the pre-ignition, 1.3 MJ shot goes into some more detail and has some cool visualizations: https://lasers.llnl.gov/news/models-and-simulations-help-map.... The one showing the target fill tube perturbing the implosion in 3D stands out to me - it shows the types of tiny things that can cause a fusion shot to go wrong.
I both like and am terrified by his explanation of how features like that come into existence.
SSAB has located it’s H2 plants near several large hydroelectric power plants, so in Sweden’s case we have to build nuclear power plants further south to provide power to the bulk of the population.
A subscription to KiwiCo.

https://www.kiwico.com/

I’ve no connection to the company.
EFI based outlook is simultaneously incredibly cursed and cool.
Why Russian women are flying to Argentina to give birth
Their moat may be from a technical perspective thin, however with that said, if you do deploy Next.js on Vercel with all the nice things that comes with out of the box, it’s hard to beat. And GCP, AWS nor Azure make it as out of the box seamless and keeps it that way as things scale.

The big cloud providers “solutions” around this all fall short introducing mindless complexity to upsell you more services often with half baked integration
If there's someone with at least a little tech/mech inclination available to supervise, perhaps a 3D printer might be considered? There are sub US$200 printers available (e.g. Creality Ender 3) which are a good starting point (though you can spend more to get something more plug-and-play) and it presents so many avenues of exploration. There's the mechanical aspect of the printer itself, but also designing things to print (e.g. tinkercad.com) and then getting to hold them is a blast. Even finding pre-designed objects online to download and print is rewarding (see printables.com for inspiration).

Admittedly 8yo is a little young to start. There are challenges, and patience is a must. But the family can find a local makerspace (or library, or school) to get a better idea of what's involved.
the capital that a capitalist spends is just unconsumed labour. It is directly related to the production of output (and thus income), just like labour is, because it _is_ another form of labour - let's call it solidified labour.

a system that doesn't directly link labour with income is basically describing welfare (a basic income for example). The income given to someone receiving this welfare did not produce any output that counterbalances the resources they received - aka, they are a net consumer. Without post-scarcity, there cannot be many net consumers, for what they consume, must be produced somehow by another (who is not a net consumer).
Thanks for doing the right thing. If you're struggling (I do, and have as well) definitely seek real professional help. I know it can be a real struggle in the UK especially to find a therapist, but the NHS tries their best and you can get started on that here: https://www.nhs.uk/service-search/mental-health/find-an-nhs-.... If you can't find someone through there BetterHelp provides online therapy to the UK https://www.betterhelp.com/advice/counseling/online-counseli....

Try not to put your mental health in the hands of a language model, you deserve real help.
Yeah, for programs that run in a once-and-done kinda way your approach totally makes sense. This is intended to be embedded into production environments where many different types of logs could spew many different kinds of multi-line information and there needs to be an efficient way to capture all that and send it for automatic diagnosis and potential further manual/automated actions (if applicable). I thought about it from a cloud deployment (Kubernetes) perspective (like a node DaemonSet).
Yes, Reddit has a quite complexe avatar system, with a builder, lot of accessories and styles, and now collectible ones: https://reddit.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/7559750587540-C...
The atomicity is for the site update.

If I'm deploying to my server, the structure would look like:

/srv/example.com/prod -> /srv/example.com/versions/1
/srv/example.com/versions/1/index.html
/srv/example.com/versions/1/assets/index.12345678.js
/srv/example.com/versions/2/index.html
/srv/example.com/versions/2/assets/index.87654321.js

A new version is atomically swapped in by changing the prod link from versions/1 to versions/2. If you request index.html and get the updated version, there's no scenario where assets/index.87654321.js could 404. Serving an updated index.html but 404 for a later request for assets/index.87654321.js is not reasonable. Of course distributed systems are harder but it's their problem to solve.

Note that with a naive web server and the layout above, one could get an old index.html but no assets/index.12345678.js by the time the .js file is requested, but that's less problematic and could be covered by some lingering cache. Or I could simply include the last build's assets as there's no conflict potential.
It's an advantage in one area, but a major problem in another
This is my experience with manpages, they're great if you sort of know what you need or want deep CLI options reference but often lack in recipes or examples.
> 5. However, if there exists a privileged reference frame, then this can be worked around.

Don't know if she mentioned it, but there is at least a unique reference frame, which is the CMBR rest frame.
Depends. If you ride a lot, ebikes are actually more eco-friendly, because electricity is more carbon friendly to produce than the extra calories you'd eat.
I think you must have missed that the first post is a replacement of the actual feature request that someone submitted. I have no dog in this fight, but it's pretty slimy to respond to someone's request by overwriting it with your explanation. They effectively hijacked the requester's name, profile picture, and who knows how many upvotes to push their own message instead of letting them have their say and, you know, replying.
I don’t agree with how you measure market share in order to try and argue that we do not see an abuse in negotiation power by Meta et al.

Here is another oil&gas comparison: OPEC countries aren’t distorting the market in their favor, because oil is just a fraction of the total energy market (e.g., nuclear, wind, solar,…)