skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In some of the supplementary documentation for this press release, you can see the government's case for seizing Zhang's assets on the grounds that they are traceable to a different convicted criminal (Ulbricht, who is the victim of Zhang's fraud), whose assets were already forfeited due to Ulbricht's conviction.

I'm curious though, if Zhang had not plead guilty and the government had not succeeded in getting a wire fraud conviction for Zhang, would their argument that the assets are forfeitable under Ulbricht's conviction have failed also? In other words, was it necessary to convict Zhang to finish seizing Ulbricht's assets, or could they have won a case for seizure without a conviction for Zhang?
The purpose of increased desire to mate would be to produce more offspring though, wouldn't it?
I don't know. Stable Diffusion runs locally. It feels really weird to run this kind of thing on someone else's computer.

Especially when the only interface is via Discord! I continue to refuse to join Discord. It's an archivists nightmare.
things can break regardless of employment status.

blue collar workers fix many of those things that can’t stay broken.

appliances, utilities, transportation, etc.

white collar usually also means enough of a credit limit.

“necessary” is relative.
The crazy thing about generative AI models is they provide a service that's significantly better in both price/output and bests possible output.

In addition to being able to create completely novel, high quality images, they can do so at speeds that no human could ever hope to match. And image models of this quality have only been around for a year, imagine where they'll be in five.

I empathize will all the artists who feel cheated out of these models training on all their data, but the sad reality is these AI models are just far too useful to ever go away. The world's standards for art and text have gone up faster than they ever have in world history over the course of the last 10 months
> I don't understand what use this is.

It takes 30 seconds versus 5 minutes to write myself?

> So you run it on a GB of similar data (meaning not literally specifically a GB, but well more than you can reasonably verify by hand).

The same way you would test code you wrote yourself.

Firstly, I check over the code. Secondly, I run it on a small data set and make sure things look correct. Thirdly, there's always the option of writing tests into the prompt after or even as the initial prompt.

> Then what? How do you know it works fine, or if it obviously crashes, what to do next?

For this specific use in this language I've done this 100s of times. It's just letting me save my energy remembering things and avoiding the stress of forgetting things.

30s vs 5m is a very large difference as well. How many 30s tasks would you be confident in finishing a day vs 5m ones? For me there's a huge difference in energy used.

> How do you know it works fine, or if it obviously crashes, what to do next?

Well, you either:

- give chatgpt the errors and see if it can fix them
- fix errors yourself and reprompt
- fix errors yourself

Using this as a tool like this is a skill like anything else and only experience will tell you which direction is most effective. For me though, I typically only give it a few chances to get things right. If it doesn't, I just finish the task myself.

Typically I can start with the scaffolding it gave me though.

There's also usefulness for exploring things you don't know about, but I wouldn't have high confidence or use that for an important work task without adequate testing to build my confidence.
How to work hard
It's still more energy consumption compared to smartphone and if you don't have a modern TV it could even be you consume more energy with blank screen.
> Yes but you can do this anywhere

I disagree. Most websites don't allow white nationalism, so there aren't any white nationalists to bully. On websites like Facebook or reddit, you're either screaming into the void or preaching to the choir.
I’ve been curious about this topic for a while primarily because I’ve found that issues with circular dependencies/imports in my projects are simply a consequence of their organization into files.

If every exported variable or function was in a separate file, that would eliminate most of my problems. But it’s just a pain to write code that way…
Ironic because people here in the UK don't have "annual physicals". There is no routine preventative medicine on the NHS.
If you’re talking about https://www.backblaze.com/scheduled-maintenance.html it’s not intended to affect file usage of B2 (the bucket functions may go offline for up to 15min, but ul, dl, and listing of files are fine. One related thing to be aware of: the official documentation suggests adding retry to every file upload as some uploads naturally fail (usually for load balancing))
Hot labor market is referring to Unemployment rate being near record lows [1].

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE
> I don't understand what use this is.

Also consider how useful this would be to someone who knows how to parse that json using Python that is learning Haskell.

Real world examples are invaluable for mapping over knowledge like that.
affiliated:

"closely associated with another typically in a dependent or subordinate position"

"an organization that is officially connected with or controlled by another, usually larger, organization"

dependent: "relying on another for support" (also uses of the words "need" and "requires")

I would agree with parent comment - NPR is not directly, closely affiliated with the state. And isn't in a subordinate position with the state. It has about 12% of its funding from tax dollars, but I think it'd likely exists without that.

I also agree with parent comment they are state funded, however, and anyone who had 12% of their income from a given source for free and no work would be biased and influenced to be friendly towards them. To suggest that the people who work at and run NPR are free from bias and influence is demonstrably not true, and so it also follows we can't assume they would approach their funding without bias.
Which courts? American ones, that approve of affirmative action, or ours here, that don't?

Do you really need courts to settle a verbal (well.. written) argument online?

Yes, it's just one of many examples where cultural differences cause issues, and where two people consider themselves "good" and the other one "bad" and in turn, censor all speech, since both are racist in atleast some of the courts.
Ubuntu 22.04 at least, supports root-on-encrypted-ZFS right from the installer and it worked just fine for me.
Thats the data though. Consumer spending is at all time high.I don't know where they are getting the money.
Huge props to Forbes for resisting the allure of the “machines will kill us all” clickbait easy money and reporting some facts
Surely at this point half the content on /pol/ is from professional propagandists and LLM-powered bots, trying to create the impression of a "4chan consensus" to sway anyone stupid enough to be taken in by that.
I've noticed some stores are scanning ID cards now. I have no idea what happens with the data they get from the scan.
Single usually means young, so you have to go where the young (adult) women hang out, or do what they like to do. I don’t know what that is though, sorry.
Show HN: CNext Low-code data science tool using ChatGPT
It's presumably an amount you could look up if you genuinely want to argue this for some reason.
I asked for an implementation of JWT using Node.js, and specified to not use the jsonwebtoken library. It gave me a text showing the theory of such implementation, I followed asking for actual code, and it answered me with a node.js code using... jsonwebtoken.

EDIT: For clarification, I ask every tool nowadays which gives me a prompt the same question.
You can find streamers who will talk about difficulties going outside due to social anxiety problems, and yet are broadcasting themselves live. It's enough of a barrier for them somehow.
That's a good guide.

It's worth highlighting that, even in v5, the best results are obtained with fairly complicated prompts.

These results, for instance: https://imgur.com/RD7fF3M

Are what came up via:
The interior of a future-brutalist megastructure. Single image comics style sci-fi robotic architecture, 70s, jet era Jetson cantilever modular space station modules, flag patch on walls, pastel glowing symbols, sci-fi towers architecture, foggy, pastel volumetric light and atmosphere, glass and steel pastel, The 5th element, The Matrix, Blade Runner, photography award, ultra elegant wide angle, volumetric light at mid day nice sky, trending on artstation, Unreal engine hyper realistic photography magazine cover, no people --v 5 --q 2 --upbeta
Fabricated as in manufactured, in the same way that a hallucination fabricates/manufactures information. There's no intent to deceive because hallucinations have no capacity for intent.
Most running clubs I've tried are 50/50. Dance classes/social dancing are usually female-heavy (The SF bay is probably an exception here). No one minds if you're bad at dancing as long as you are friendly and don't injure anyone.
Sorry, I realize I didn't make it clear, but I meant Mac OS (on a MBP).
BrightBot – ChatGPT and Dalle for WhatsApp
Creating photorealistic images has never been as easy before as it is with BrightBot.

I am releasing BrightBot and looking for early users. The first 20 users to redeem the code:
ALPHATESTER

will get a 3 month subscription for free.

Additionally you can invite friends and you'll both get 15 days for free. Just tell BrightBot that you want to refer a friend and share your invite code.

AI is here!
I've had my pinboard "one-time fee" account for 12 years and it still lets me login and do stuff.

They switched to annual accounts in 2015 and have been encouraging people to move but I'm not convinced of the value-for-money if I do so.
Apple's wide ram interface is an advantage. But they aren't doing anything exotic to achieve it. AMD & Intel could offer consumer cpus with more memory channels but they choose not to, likely for cost and market-segmentation reasons.
If you don’t try things that you don’t already do then how will you know whether you enjoy them? Most people who don’t enjoy dancing don’t enjoy because they feel uncomfortable at such a low skill level. Learn to dance and then you can enjoy it. Like most things, if you’re good at it then you enjoy it. Both can cause the other.

And there’s tons of women at dance classes.
I’ve been doing ReactJS development with both the M1 and now the M2 MacBook Air for a year now. My app’s transpiler production build takes about 5 seconds and any development incremental is essentially instantaneous.

I can’t imagine most developers work even stressing an M2 unless you are compiling chrome or something.

Best thing as a contractor I don’t even bother to bring a power adapter. I work for 8 hours and leave with 20%-40% remaining every day.
This really has nothing to do with the mono vs. micro kernel argument. Also micro kernels were very popular in the research community at the time that Linux was in its infancy, mach and minix are both examples of this. Linux did win on merit and the future work of micro kernels was forked and past micro kernels are only vestigially micro.

Edit: Not sure why this is being downvoted, micro kernels are the antithesis of what eBPF is trying to accomplish. I say this as a university researcher that has built and worked on many kernels with different tradeoffs. If you disagree please explain in a comment.

Micro kernels increase security and decrease complexity by running a very small resource manager in the processor's highest privilege level. eBPF runs code at the highest privilege level by actually extending the kernel, it actually supplants doing kernel work in userspace. It greatly increases kernel complexity with an new subsystem and decreases security in order to allow extensibility in the face of a hard to change interface (syscalls in a mature operating systems are difficult to change).
Unprobable speculation? Ever heard of the final solution? FFS...
You’ve gotta sell yourself on the lie.
I think the point of content is for users to go onto your site. If you're creating content for someone else to use and profit from, that's a problem.

I believe there was a case recently where some sort of lyric website sued Google for showing lyrics in their search, taking away the need for users to actually go to the lyric website. Not sure what the outcome was, but I think it shows one aspect of these chat search engines that is problematic.
I think those aren't counted. Or, ancillary house rule, you can optionally but irrevocably reveal them?
12 instances in 6 months is 2 per month. Reminder that over 100 humans in the US crash and die in their car PER DAY
I gave it a try by asking it a question relating to my own work, essentially "how can I do mock patching in Delphi".

A basic correct answer is that "not easily, as the mocking frameworks available for the language don't support it". If you gave a programmer this question and a bit of time to solve it they might discover the Detours library which could be used in conjunction with the existing mocking frameworks to do it. This kind of insight seems to be beyond LLMs, at least for the moment, but I was hoping for at least the basic understanding of the question required to get the "no can do". answer.

But instead, it waffled on and gave me examples of creating mock objects explicitly in the two mocking frameworks that are available, all of which was quite impressively presented but not answering the question I asked.

If somebody can figure out how to stop LLMs BSing at length they'll be a lot more useful.
I've never seen this problem before and arrived at the optimal solution to the first section, sans code, in about 10 seconds. Despite that, there's almost no way I would pass a technical interview at Google.

The only reason I can think that the optimal solution was immediately obvious to me is perhaps because in a previous life I did a lot of work building convoluted application specific indexing schemes for data in a distributed KV store that had basically zero useful built-in secondary indexing schemes where piles of parallel GETs were about as "free" as just doing one, but chaining strings of requests back & forth to the client iteratively made for sad times. This meant that it was essential to be clever about what could be coded into key names and precomputed from application/use-case context to know what keys to fetch "all at once" to gather as much relevant data as possible with as few serially dependent requests as possible. One such use case depended on a modified C-trie as part of the solution, so I got very familiar with what kinds of problems they're for and what their limitations are.

Given that, I can't tell what that says about the question, about me, or about Google. What I can say for sure is that because I can't tell the above, the technical interview at my company is signing an NDA and sitting down for a couple hours and just actively pairing on real work & real problems with real teammates.

With the nature of software development work being what it is, I really don't understand why we as an industry run interviews like they're game shows or try to manufacture workplace simulators with terrible model conformance.
Just boarded the ferry between Fukuoka mad Busan...
There are giant shortages in a number of job categories that can't be done remotely. Things like nursing, restaurant jobs, the trades (electrician, plumber, etc.)
Is there any link with hit location?
Are you referring to public defection and/or drug use or screaming at the top of one’s lungs for hours at a time?

Those are primarily public health issues regardless of people’s puritanical views. Hygiene, noise, environmental ordinances and such!

We have a lot of rights stripped away from individuals (including you and me) to promote the public health at large.

Furthermore, the constitution doesn’t get everything right and isn’t a backstop for arguing against anything (except in a legal forum) as it is a living document (albeit with a high bar) and more recently demonstrated through overturning judicial rulings.
But that's a far cry from,

> lose control of yourself drugs are a scourge on society and the people they infect.

Is the problem shooting drugs or is it that you might see it happen?
I also play this table tennis game to just chill out mentally. For some reason it brings me peace to hit a ball back and forth.
This is an excellent kind of analysis I was curious about this kind of thing and I don't know why I never saw it before.

Conclusions are that by 2030 there will be at most 1000x the available computer power and data for AI models unless some super weird things happen.

EDIT: oh it's submitted by someone at openai no wonder lol
I think they meant perceived value as a potential mate. Not net value to society.
I understand what he is saying. The difference between the two lines was positive in the last month. But, compared to how large this positive gap was last August and September (looks like about 4% to 5%) this really seems negligible and possibly due to noise. And, it seems even more negligible compared to the cumulative negative (a good thing) gap since October. I think it's a little early to call the trend on one recent data point. Seems a little alarmist.
That’s the importance of having a unified approach, shared between the government and the Fed. It doesn’t help inflation when the country is running all-time-high (or close to it) deficit levels, especially if that money isn’t being appropriately allocated.
It's a felony to use Tornado Cash now. And the government interprets sanctions law extraterritorially so you're not safe in other countries either.
They do have channels but they don't supply a select equivalent.
What a stupid idea. What does it even mean? Sure, all I need is to have my code randomly changed according the guesses of a chatbot.

I understand why non-technical people think this makes sense, just as I understand why people who hate driving might like self-driving cars. But I don't understand why rich guys who buy expensive cars want to be driven around like an invalid by their self-driving tech, and I don't understand why so many programmers think auto-coding is a good idea. It's not just foolish, it's the glorification of weak-mindedness. "Hey look everybody, I'm a coder who's proud not to code." What??
SEEKING FREELANCER | Remote - Fabius Labs.

We are a small full product agency that helps our clients solve their problem. We do product ideation, scoping, design, development, and data science.

We are in search of someone to assist on a project by project basis.

Project: We are building a web app for a client. The project is a GIS front end for users to interact with a map and gain insights about particular locations demographics, census data, etc.

Technologies: NextJS (React) + Supabase + ArcGIS JS SDK

Please see the link below to apply

Job Description: https://www.fabiuslabs.com/careers/senior-react-developer
Website: fabiuslabs.com
Just to get the facts right: The "bullshit fractal" Bitcoin is currently at about 50% of it's all time high, and is raising again constantly since beginning of 2023.

OTOH: Whether generative AI has any value beyond mass desinformation and making "creative people" unemployed only the future may show. Also: Given than you need super-computers to do the training it's unlikely it will become a technology that can be used by everyone. (The situation here is imho similar to "open hardware": You may be able to design the hardware but you're not able to actually build it in your basement—like it's the case for open source software, which made kind of a revolution possible. AI will likely remain purely a toy for the few richest companies on this planet, without any access for the masses, beyond being "customers").

Regarding VR (the "metaverse"): This was a dead idea already as Second Life was hyped. VR pops up every 10 - 20 years since the 60's, but never caught on; and likely never will for practical reasons. Even Bitcoin has more real wold applications average people would care about than VR (e.g. you can at least buy "stuff" with Bitcoin, or send and receive money against the will of your government).
Fair. Unfortunately I can no longer edit the submission title, but will update the project README.
I’m not OP, but I don’t see an inconsistency about what they actually said. They didn’t say screen real estate doesn’t matter at all, only that the specific space under discussion isn’t a concern to them. I imagine many Mac users can relate, especially long time Mac users who remember when the menubar couldn’t even be hidden.

As far as the value of larger versus smaller screens, I can also relate to OP. When I’m sitting with my laptop on my actual lap, I definitely have fewer things on screen at any given time than when I’m using my comically large 43” desk monitor. I’m generally not looking at more things on that monstrosity at any given time! But being able to “switch” to them without interacting with a mouse/keyboard is a convenience that the larger screen affords. Even if I don’t care about trying to shove more of my active focus into the top few pixels of either screen.
FWIW, it's not specific to religion. The exact same thing happens with political ideologies, too, and cultural differences in general. Historically, a lot of art, knowledge and people were erased in conflicts over those things - through wars and civil wars and reformations and such.

My take from this is that zealotry has a long proven, insanely high base rate of being disastrously wrong. It's also sheer idiocy on a theoretical level - it's the extreme case of using confidence to hide lack of understanding. If you feel you're becoming zealous about some cause or idea, this means you most likely don't understand much of it[0]. If you're in an environment that encourages zealotry, you're being used.

Something to keep in mind when evaluating your religious, political, social or technological beliefs.

--

[0] - It doesn't mean the idea itself is necessarily bogus. The idea is probably wrong in some ways - all ideas are - but zealotry is just stupid, regardless of the subject. To abuse a philosophical point, regardless of whether your belief is true or not, you ought not to be zealous about it.
This is a really cool step but as someone without the suggested GPU, it isn't easy or one click for me yet.

I am hoping that someone makes a very simple Jupyter notebook where I can enter my RLHF file and select a few other settings and just run (on AWS or Azure; willing to pay per fine-tuned model say $100-$500 for cloud credits + notebook access).
Japanese broadcast television is currently reporting that the missiles are down and did not come down on land.
> Top 1% richest in the US have a net worth of >$10M, and you need >$1M to get into the 90th percentile.

To be in the top 5% of income (not wealth), you need to earn about $350K per year. Many Meta employees make it to that level. Especially if married to someone earning a good amount as well.

As for the apartment: Check if it has a buy-out clause (e.g. pay one month's rent to break the lease).

If one insists on living in a HCOL area even after being laid off, they should at least own the fact that they're voluntarily gambling.
Thanks for explaining this!

It seemed to me that option #1 only applied if you were a fugitive and your whereabouts were unknown, not when you simply leave the state or country.

As to furtherance, I wonder how precise the definition of it is; is using proceeds of a crime, furtherance of a crime? Is obfuscating a crime, furtherance of a crime?

Edit: This answers most of my questions and the answer seems to be "it's complicated"
https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/RL31253.pdf
I am sad that Discord has replaced IRC as the chatroom of the internet's subculture.
You appear to be shadowbanned.