skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hm that seems like a mistake. If I'm reading the docs right, the Mullvad browser will let you browse the web without using their/any VPN, which mean that it's entirely possible to accidentally surf to a site without having your VPN up, and reveal your IP address to that site. To contrast, there's no way to use the Tor Browser without using the onion network so it's ~impossible to accidentally browse to site and reveal your IP address, and not just the IP address of the exit node.

OpSec is hard, and tools letting you shoot yourself in the foot doesn't help. There are plenty of other browsers out there that don't offer VPN integration, so (imo) they should have made the browser a paid feature for customers, instead of giving it away for free like the market has demanded since IE6.
Great concept, bravo!

Here is some feedback:

1. I am trying it right now, but it seems some of my documents are not getting embedded.

I've tried adding 3 documents from their URL. I can see them if I hit Datasets > my dataset > Documents > View.
But there is nothing (zero rows) in the dataset. And when I try using the Playground, my context (result of the search) returns nothing.

Am I doing something wrong?

2. It seems to work if I manually upload the same documents in the UI. However, for some reason your upload system restricts the file types, so I can only upload them as .txt files, but not as .md files.

3. I don't see a way to show a delimiter in-between the returned search results in the {{context}}. This means that the context is one mashup of content from several documents, and it confuses GPT sometimes. I would prefer to get "n" context variables that I can use as I want in my prompt: {{context-1}},{{context-2}} and so on.

4. Similarly, I don't see a way to have the metadata included in the "context". It's too bad, because there seems to be no way to tell the LLM that "this content is in document ABC and the other is from document BDF". If it was possible, then the LLM would be able to point the user to the right resource in its answer. So I would prefer {{context}} to be a JSON (which GPT models understand perfectly) of the chunks, with their text and metadata, rather than just a hodgepodge concatenation of all the chunks.

5. I need to be able to provide "reference links" for a completion. Is there a way to identify the chunks used in the API response for completion? Right now it seems like I need to run a bunch of queries:

- a `search` query to get access to the relevant chunks (rows), which doesn't tell me which document they are from,

- a `/api/datasets/{id}/rows` query to list all the rows and find the associated documents for each (which could be a request with a gigantic payload or multiple paginated requests)

- and then the completion query.

Couldn't the completion query return : here are the rows used in this completion, and here is the associated document for each row?

I am loving the concept of Baseplate and we'll very likely integrate this right away as it solves a big need we had for an upcoming feature of our own. Nice work, this is impressive!

Sébastien
Absolutely. Unbelievable, that the property of other's doesn't count for a lot of people, so it's handled without care. If you own it, you take care of it.

So, one step to mitigate the voters results could be renting the scooters for long time with monthly fees. But then, you don't need the apps anymore. So,the whole idea is dead for Paris.
Italian here. This law is a copy of what the French already do, but unfortunately there's a staggeringly large population of 60 to 70 year olds who did not learn English at school and feel powerless and cut out when foreign words are used. This law is to cater specifically to the older population.
What is the difference.
It's based on Firefox, and I am able to install Firefox extensions. With 1Password on it now, I think I am going to try this browser for a while.
They’re giving you fake money in return for your identity. What’s not to like?
A low barrier to entry for surveillance means citizens can more easily watch their governments too.

As long as surveillance tech requires big resources, governments will have the edge. Miniaturize it, decentralize it, and it means citizens and public interest organizations can hold the government accountable more easily (this is, notably, what OSINT is all about).
Payment Links for UAE
Does securepay provides payment links options like https://www.abzer.com/payment-links/ for UAE
You might find this article helpful from my colleague Tobias: https://slint-ui.com/blog/rust-and-cpp.html
The 100% truth is that you had no idea of any of the detail about whatever you saw. Unless someone has a massive trust with a procreation requirement, there is no free ride for children in America.
I think history's going to have quite a bit to say about the individuals who've chosen to take this stance. I don't buy the argument that it's just business either, last I checked Patrick Collison and Jack Dorsey were doing pretty well for themselves.
Note that CO2 emissions also come from the device construction. So optimize for old devices (that will also make newer ones sleep more).
My skepticism is not bad faith, it's honest inquiry based on the facts available to me, which I have enumerated for you.

The hiding of scientific data from a charity has VERY few kind explanations and a lot of terrible ones. The balance of probabilities points towards Sam Altman acting maliciously and not in the public interest, which might be "okay" if he hadn't robbed a charity to do so.

I am still open to contrary viewpoints, but you're not presenting any, you are only saying I am acting in bad faith for what I (and others here) consider to be merited and valid skepticism based on recent events and statements from Altman himself.

Can you provide any charitable interpretation of the hiding of scientific data from a charity whose mission to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity?
Scientific institutions vs. scientific method. Pravda vs istina.
Any one you can suggest for the 116-130 people?
Simply download the Tor browser and evaluate its performance on one of the many browser fingerprint [1][2] and browser leak [3][4] web services. The last time I checked, it didn't pass every test.

[1] https://www.amiunique.org/fp
[2] https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/
[3] https://browserleaks.com/
[4] https://www.dnsleaktest.com/
Isn't that the actual definition of a pyramid scheme?
Inspired by Steve mould, I had some fun doing something quite similar a while ago experimenting with Bell Siphon, 3d printing, and numerical simulation. If this interest someone here I just pushed it to Thingiverse now https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:5948252 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S748mcM0MSg

As Steve showed, it's particularly important to take into account both air and water.

There is still some work needed to make it Sim2Real and optimize the design automatically.

The ambitious end-goal, is to have a cascading siphon (not so dissimilar than the flushing mechanism in your toilet) that can reliably be switched on by a single additional drop of water. (Currently I achieve this goal using a Shishi Odoshi fountain to arm the siphon very reliably but it still has one moving part, but that's a story for another day).

Quite fun, messy and time-consuming rabbit-hole to go down to, cause you need to get the details right.
I'd especially be interested in seeing how they implement on iOS, with Apple considering opening up options beyond WebKit:

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastYear&page=0&prefix=fal...
Stick out to who? Just set the useragent to a default firefox one (assuming its not already set) and you're golden.
The Gospel teaches a similar idea with the notion of charity. Matthew 6:3

“But when thou doest alms, let not thy
left hand know what thy right hand doeth”

It helps if you’re familiar with the analysis, but I think the idea translates. The teaching being that if you’re going to be charitable, you shouldn’t do it as a means to advance your status. The people who give simply for recognition aren’t being charitable at all, they’re seeking status in the same way everyone else does.
Starlink cells are 25km. It's quite easy to be semi rural and within 25km of town. If town people get/need starlink it will congest.

Im been watching this as this is a potential issue for my location. So far speeds are OK and usually 30+ and sometimes closer to 200mb down.
Well what you are saying is that the argument of the creators of the model is erroneous and you know better. More power to you.
Both Chrome and Firefox are working on native iOS versions in preperation for the expected opening up of iOS this year so would imagine they can just fork that and release their version.
You make a lot of assumptions about me. No one can play their role better than I can read it. I have aphantasia, so tv offers something over books, mainly how things and people look. Plays don't.
not really, Joe Rogan pre pandamic was still the best interviewer in my openion of smart people.

the problem with smart people is that they know that they're smart and so they won't stop talking or driving the conversation.

Joe Rogan, pre pandamic / spotify deal was humble enough and would just invite people and let them talk, it was way more informative and less echo champery style of conversation ... I can't stand listening to this guy.
Uh yeah I mean I know what you’re talking about - he does defer to the interviewee (and they are often wrong as well, like in the Elon interview).

Moreso I’m referring to the LessWrong/Reddit/HN/Twitter internet-lore format which he borrows from and leans into. Many of his questions are deep on the surface but ultimately more about sensationalism (even if that means a bad faith read of the problem).

Also, at times I suspect interviewees pre-negotiate certain things for him to see in a positive manner. Like in this last episode, thanking Sam for open sourcing GPT eval - ignoring that GPT-4’s basic architecture description wasn’t even released; a big “fuck you” to researchers hoping to do any sort of replication or peer review.
The passports that the general (foreign) audience knows - the external/international one.
You should check out what Lenovo is doing currently; I just picked up a X1 Carbon 6th gen for £340 and loaded Ubuntu on it. The machine runs incredibly well, the trackpad is fantastic and it's a very quiet machine. Literally blew me away with the value for money, coming from my experience with Dell / Huawei laptops they're great.
Looking into the dev tools also reveals that the page tries to load Google Analytics without consent. Not cool.
> It's one of the simpler and more consistent ones.

floor
cooperation
coop
Wow, I pressed this without actually reading your comment, and I feel like I need to put bleach into my eyes now.
Is it even fair use under the law to consume that Windows source code?
Well, there's a minimum acceptable bound for status. Not only in a social hierarchy, literally "status" in the sense of lifestyle and being.

A house, a car, a family. Most people want that. If they don't have that, they will almost certainly be unhappy. If they do have it, they may still be unhappy, but for different reasons.

The perversion is that somehow having basic 20th century necessities such as a house and a family is now seen as some sort of privilege. If you believe that, you've been brainwashed.

Strictly, yes, it doesn't flow from the stars, someone has to build and produce the structure, but ideas that people should simply be okay sharing accommodation / living in micro flats / eating bugs / foregoing children to 'save the planet' etc are simply misguided in a world in which a huge number of people (not some microscopic elite, but like, half of the UK, US, etc) have more than that and treat more than that as being a basic standard.
> drunk driving may kill a lot of people, but it also helps a lot of people get to work on time, so, it;s impossible to say if its bad or not,

https://twitter.com/dril/status/464802196060917762
> Well, how should it be done then? You just explain what doesn’t work and explain that “nuclear for sure doesn’t work either”. You offer no viable path how to “go renewable”.

I'm not sure I understand your question. You are saying "the problem is that it did not work because it was ideological". I'm saying "it is incorrect, the plan was not an irrational crazy thing out of ideology, it was a scientific study and the choice was as rational as other possibilities". Then you are now telling me "well, the plan does not work, so it can only be ideological, unless you provide a plan that will work for sure". That does not make any sense. Nobody can come with a plan that works for sure. Saying "you don't have a plan that works for sure, so I can say whatever I want and I'm right" is certainly not a rational way of thinking.

> Not in reality it seems though.

What? You are saying that in a grid that the German government has botched, there is no capacity for compensate for "no wind night". How does that prove that the "no wind night" is an impossible obstacle?

Again, it is MATH! Math proves it is possible. The fact that the German government did not put their money where their mouth was is obviously not proving that not possible.

And don't get me wrong, it works both way: France messed up their nuclear park. It DOES NOT MEAN NUCLEAR CANNOT WORK. Based on our conversation so far, I doubt that if someone bring France summer problems to demonstrate that nuclear does not work, you will not, legitimately, say that it's a stupid argument. That's the same here.

And as long as there are idiots that are unable to discuss the situation by accepting the complexity and by accepting that, maybe, just maybe, decisions that don't fit their naive conclusions are not the result of "bad ideological guys", then, we will never progress.

> ... your ideological dream world ... people like you ...

I see. And you are criticizing the German government for being ideological.
For your information, I was part of a team that helped creating new nuclear project. But you are yet one of those m*rons who are incapable of not seeing the world in black or white. You criticize the German government, and yet, you fall 1000 times faster into the "oh my, this guy is bringing reality that I don't like, so I should convince myself that my church is the great rationality on earth and that he is an heretic". Pathetic.
Customer service has gotten worse, and the pandemic alone is not to blame
I don't want to get off topic but the NBN hasn't even worked. I'm only offered wireless in my apartment 4km from the CBD, currently 1.7 Mbps
And then you quickly reach the conclusion that the only way to assess whether one of the implementation choices will be faster/less memory consuming/etc. in production is to implement both, deploy to production and observe the performance on the actual workloads. And the findings don't generalize, so you can't actually learn from them and build a predictive theory.

And this conclusion doesn't sit well with quite a number of developers, myself included, because I personally would like to be able to do the "right" choice without the brute force of "try everything and see what works better".
Option Selects and Other Tactics
No, because there is no payment from new signups to people who already have tokens.

It is something much more bizarre than a pyramid scheme.
That's better but still wrong. I have just two eyeballs, but many usernames. Some are tied to each other, some are not.

Eyeballs are just eyeballs and just like any biometric horrible idea for anything beyond local-access verification.
The solution to speech ban, is exactly like the alcohol ban which occurred in America at some point. When alcohol prohibition was happening at New York, it was Greek gangs which transported illegal alcohol, executing snitches and blackmailing cops and stuff. The Italian word mafia, started to describe that kind of situation, only after Italian gangs overthrew Greek gangs in the dominance of the black market at New York.

A black market for speech, is the ideal solution. As soon as people desire certain information on the internet, someone will find a way to provide it to them, for double, triple or 10 times the price. A black market of information just opens up some opportunities, that's all i am saying.

But to have a black market there has to be a market to begin with. Bitcoin, not BTC will create new opportunities for all kinds of markets.
The cost of decompression is something I've run into, regarding 3D data. Draco, which is a highly efficient compression system for 3D mesh data, is primarily used with browser based webGL / gltf model rendering, and it achieves excellent compression ratios for online transmission. However, the decompression cost at the viewer's end often means that you will wait longer to see your 3D model than if you had used a simpler format, especially over fast links.
Can anyone explain how this won't, putting it diplomatically, attract certain 'dark web' types, and in turn bring mullvad under the microscope of law enforcement?
I moved to Finland, which is why it comes to mind. Finnish is definitely difficult, for native English speakers due to the grammar.

But Finnish is easier than English in the sense that pronounciation is 100% regular and predictable - that's the metric I've been using in this thread to say "English is hard". (I understand the reasons behind that, the mixture of influences, loan-words, and voewl shifting.)

In a lot of ways English is easy, and even bad English is understandable.
Ironically you also listed most the reasons I'm not a libertarian. As more things move from the public sphere to the private one, there's less transparency, not even a hope of public control (such as providing a moral direction via elections), and no obligation of improving anything. Structures like KGB and CIA will still exist, they'll just be completely outside the law, multiply in numbers and intensify the violent acts, because no public controls will be in place.
I guess why not.

This is an open source, rebranded Firefox and Firefox-like browsers could use some publicity. It promotes privacy and privacy can use some publicity too. Tor too.

Mullvad seems to be honest in the fact that their business model is selling VPNs and it's nice they are saying it's not enough. They are not saying that you might not need one though.

We need a Firefox with good defaults and it seems like this browser is such a thing. I'd prefer these privacy features to be in upstream Firefox but I guess world is not perfect and that Firefox still relies on revenues from Google so can't be as privacy-focused as it should.

My little concern I guess is that this browser will push for their service so it's a bit like an ad for them, at least with its name. But fair enough, and at least the business model seems healthy.

With Mullvad already being a Mozilla partner for their branded VPN, all this actually look good. They seem to be spending their money on worthy stuff.
> The tokens may carry the promise of future riches

ahem Howey test

Any local financial services or data protection agency should present these guys with a list of very awkward questions like "what are you going to do with this data" and "under what circumstances will these 'coins' have value".
What's wronger than wrong is not even being wrong.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong
We can always reduce the amount of lanes for cars, even from 1 to 0 in very old european cities. Cars were once a novelty too, and all street lanes were engulfed by motorised modes of transportation.
The fucking article.
It's starting to feel like AI people are becoming the new Crypto Bros.
That's an interesting optimization.

But the sample images seem to have been originally quite heavily compressed with JPG or something similar, because zooming in gives very visible compression artifacts.
I can see how they fail as the author nurtures low self esteem centered culture. It leads to over important components from the day one and the expenses multiple through the unnecessary dependencies like neutrons in uranium. Fool I say. Fool.
Price doesn't matter, only carbon matters

It's trivial to fund renewables with a chinese, coal-powered industry, so it will look cheap, but it's putting coal under the rug.
No. Pyramid scheme requires people to bring in new money to pay the earlier people.

This is giving “monopoly” money in exchange for eye scans (under the pretense of preventing bots), and hoping for said monopoly money be become valuable
So I guess that's other stuff that you'll need to feel and process and find some way to kind of feel complete about or air quotes resolve in order to fully kind of move on from this stage. A lot of sadness as well, disappointment. Like I think maybe you just didn't have the time to feel and process and it still hurts. What happened, you know, six, six and a half years ago, it still hurts, you know. And it seems like you probably haven't really had the chance to grieve. And at some point you kind of just became numb about that.

And that's sad. I think, you know, it'd be great to just kind of do that, you know, mental health day grieving thing, put on the sad music, and just let yourself cry and feel sad about all those kind of things and go through that, you know, because that is going to help bring fresh, allow stuff to move and bring fresh perspective probably that will then allow you to feel more moved on. And then when that happens, you'll see more clearly what it is you actually need to do. It may not have anything to do with what I've been saying, but if you're able to process those things, you'll get your perspective, which will work for you and completely clear for you.

And yet I think you do need to feel like you've done something clever for yourself financially. Like you haven't done something stupid. And yet it's strange because I feel that also that like that sort of minimum walk away money achieving that will equate with you feeling like you've done something clever. So it's like it's like you can kill both birds with one stone there. Like getting that sort of money is not important minimum walk away money that you want is also also be the same thing as feeling like you've achieved a clever kind of financial thing there, even though from another point of view, it's just like sort of the minimum you should get. But you like you can get it in this way where it feels clever. Like it will tick that box, you know, it seems because there'll be some sort of wrangle or some kind of clever way to do it.

I don't know, you know, whatever the details are. They're not really that important, I guess, but not for me, certainly not right now. And I'm not telling you this, you know, basically, it seems you'll be able to satisfy your emotional and financial needs around the money. Yeah, I think the worst thing would be if you have lingering unresolved stuff preventing you from actually drawing a line of sand when you finally come on this journey and move on to the next thing, next space for you. But I think if you feel through all that's important for you, you'll be able to identify things you need to do any unresolved stuff you need to address.

And you'll be able to kind of achieve all that closure, basically. Do what you feel you need to do so then you're able to let it go. And in this, you know, how what other people end up doing right is not about you. You just you'll work out what you need to do and you need to do that. But, you know, it's not a guarantee. I mean, you have to you have to formulate that that transition plan that like a culmination of journey plan for yourself. Right. Hopefully this helps.

... continued below ...
If you do something useful it will probably attract criminals, nothing we can do about it.
It's probably easier to make fake eyeballs or write software to emulate them.