skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What kind of helps since we all needs breaks for the keyboard every hour anyway is to do clasp your hands and bring your arms up above you and do some movements like turning. Alternatively do some lifts with weights as well for more strengthening and extra bloodflow.
Macropad mapped primarily for my email client.

Row 1: Delete, Archive, Mark Unread and Advance
Row 2: Undo, Next, Previous

It’s simple and I know the shortcuts for all of this, but it’s honestly drastically reduced the time spent triaging my email.
Is building in Generative AI risk?
With models constantly evolving and supporting new use cases, small startups are constantly pivoting to doing newer things in AI. It's only a matter of time before these new use cases are supported by the upcoming models.

My question is - how does a small company keep up to speed, with cash crunch? It's really a chaotic time in ai right now. What are your thoughts?
This is why I laugh when people say AI can be factually incorrect. Just look at this comment made by a human!

I've heard from insiders that the cost is roughly a couple cents per ChatGPT message but that was back with the legacy GPT-3.5 model, not the Turbo model or GPT-4
You are confused about what fitness means.
They most likely have the new fancy 360 degree xray machines. Basically the operator can look at the stuff inside your bag from any angle so having a laptop (hunk of metal blocking you from seeing what is behind it) won't block them from seeing the other stuff in the bag and thus no need to take them out anymore.

Shoes we never had to remove shoes or if we had to it was for a very short period of time.

At least that is what they did at Helsinki-Vantaa airport here in Finland. This is what is being used now https://www.rapiscansystems.com/en/products/920ct
Are you sure? Because based on my reading of the article it sounds like it's all embedded in the executable.

>I ask Schnee if Buchler’s source code could be reconstructed from a copy of the software.

>It might be possible to induce the machine code to dump out a database of every phoneme it had ever uttered — all the tiny pieces it had used to sing Armenian and Lithuanian and Egyptian trope — and then, if you were very patient and very skilled, you might be able to write code to piece them back together.
People love to hate on Musk. What I find bizzare is that 15 years ago it was NickelBack and Justin Beiber. Nowaday it's Bezos/Musk. Not sure if I just don't live in the same circle since I'm twice as old or Tech Bros are the new pop stars.
>What a tangled web we've woven for ourselves to live in, but I guess that was the will of the people so there you go, we got what we asked for.

That's exactly what happened, at least in the US. I can't speak for other countries such as in Europe.

Americans wanted Euclidean zoning, subdivisions, no walkability, giant yards, a car-centric society, NIMBYism, and racism and classism baked into land-use laws, and now they're living with the effects of all that: unaffordable housing.

Talking to Americans about this is futile and exasperating, and pointless. You might talk to one and they'll agree about a few points, but then suggest changing laws to let someone build a multi-unit building next to their single-family house and they'll freak out. Suggest eliminating parking requirements and they'll scream. Suggest improving public transit and cutting back on road budgets and they'll cry about "socialism". It's hopeless: Americans simply don't want to live in the kind of society you see in urban Europe or Japan, because they all want to have their own castle, but that simply isn't sustainable. It only worked as long as it did because of the postwar economic boom and America's huge land area, but now the chickens are coming home to roost.
I would do it like this:

#if SIZEOF_SIZE_T == 8
typedef int64_t ssize_t
#elif SIZEOF_SIZE_T == 4
typedef int32_t ssize_t
#elif SIZEOF_SIZE_T == 2 // LOL
typedef int16_t ssize_t
#else
#error port me!
#endif

SIZEOF_SIZE_T can be obtained using a script which compiles a test program without executing it.

Over they years I used more than one approach, settling on this one:

https://www.kylheku.com/cgit/txr/tree/configure?id=1f902ca63...

Here, in the test program, a DEC macro has been defined which given a constant expression, produces two decimal digits as the initializer for a two-character array. For instance:

DEC(42) -> { '4', '2' } // not exactly: character constants are not used

With this trick we can use DEC(sizeof (size_t)) to get a value like { ' ', '8' } into the portion of some character data, which we can prefix with an identifying string we can look for, like:

SIZEOF_SIZE_T= 8

That we can basically grep out. In my configure script, this data is extracted, spaces are removed from it, and it's evaluated directly as shell assignments, so then the values are available in shell variables.
This sounds very interesting! If you ever figure out how it came to that conclusion, that would deserve some write up.
One trick I found is to gate mutable access to state behind a "transaction object" which sets a flag for each object mutated, then once the transaction object's destructor is called, recomputes all derived state based on which flags were set. Using a destructor might not be the best idea since I ended up not marking it noexcept, it may be better to add an explicit "recompute" function called at the end, but this breaks the convenience of `state().cursor_mut() = new_cursor;` automatically recomputing derived state once the state() object is destroyed.
This might be the best take I've seen so far and I cant believe I didnt think of it considering my job is frequently integrating AI into production software. The more things AI has been able to do the more things we integrate it into which has resulted in more work for software engineers. People are gonna want gpt features in everything and we'll be there to add it, probably assisted by a gpt programming assistant.
> Is whatever the standard mechanism is for securing containers to ships sufficient here?

Not in the slightest. Containers are secured by lashing them. But that's just the one level, mostly. Then after that it is twist locks. There are enough pictures of containers being ripped apart by the sea. Or stacks entirely damaged. Containers are made from steel, loads of people tend to assume they're indestructible. Or that they can hold way more weight than they can (scrapped metal people).
Magnetic USB cables are a godsend for young kids with tablets.
Same here.

Although you say "slightly Manga-ish" women - I saw some quite realistic photos.

Your comment was posted 22 hours ago though. It's possible that the models (pun unintended) have gotten even better since you last looked.
Are there any good local models? Gpt-2 is pants once you've gotten used to 4.
> But it’s also not true, diesel releases more CO2 for the same energy than gasoline does. [0]

That article makes the assumption that the ethanol component of finished motor gasoline has net zero carbon emissions.

https://theconversation.com/fact-check-are-diesel-cars-reall...

"So, while diesel fuel contains slightly more carbon (2.68kg CO₂/litre) than petrol (2.31kg CO₂/litre), overall CO₂ emissions of a diesel car tend to be lower. In use, on average, this equates to around 200g CO₂/km for petrol and 120g CO₂/km for diesel."
I never loved biology in school. Then I came across this post: https://jsomers.net/i-should-have-loved-biology/

Then I read Machinery of Life by David S. Goodsell
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/6601267

I was just plain amazed that a subject can be presented in such a way.
What alternatives exist today? Honestly, I think langchain just fills a void for having a more streamlined "api" for LLM-driven app workflows which is why it's hyped. Plus the fact that they have bindings for both JS and Python makes it easy to get up and running and building custom "agents" for different tasks.
Your math doesn't work because the situations are incomparable.

jszymborski comments did not break the law.

Tesla violations of employment laws regarding a hostile work environment did break the law.

Two different juries decided that Tesla broke the law, and that punitive damages were needed to deter that behavior in the future.

What law is jszymborski breaking? What court is applicable? None.
Wow. Nice! Didn't know this exists. Planning to get one. Do you have any recommendations?
Artemis-II - NASA's new moon landing mission
Does it have anything to do with Post.news going live, given that Post uses Sign in with Twitter as one of their login options?
> This means that what you cannot speak, you cannot think.

This is false.
Putting myself into a situation where I have no choice would mean being constantly in grave danger (financial, social, or relationship). If I fail once, it may have a catastrophic impact on my life. The worst part is that I may fail due to external factors that I have little control over (e.g., getting a huge loan to force myself to work, while experiencing a serious injury that prevents me from working for months). Anything other than looming doom wouldn't work on me.
Google Colab
Watched it, nice one!!

Don't forget about Papers Please
https://papersplea.se/
During WW1 several types of military bicycle used springs in a similar manner:

https://m.facebook.com/UlsterTransportMuseum/photos/a.461285...
It's the Reddit hive mind mentality.

Doesn't start entirely organic but it ends up being nearly 100% organic hate for certain topics.

Useful idiots start parroting hit campaigns and it becomes "common knowledge" for them which they repeat whenever the topic comes up, creating more useful idiots.

See any "controversial" topic here. Eich/Brave, Elon/Tesla, Facebook/React. It's all the same talking points, some being years old, most being purely emotional/subjective.

If you respond back they'll just call you a paid shill or troll, but if you don't respond back the echo chamber goes unchallenged and makes more useful idiots to parrot those same talking points to restart the cycle.

Funny you mention Nickleback, it was the first time I noticed the hive mind hate. Personally they are a really good band and everyone I know (outside of Reddit) likes them and knows pretty much every single one of their songs, wonder who Chad Kroeger pissed off.
> More often than not it results in me literally sobbing under my desk.

Sometimes you just need to get things out of your system. I feel much better after a good sob. The brain is not a perfectly designed machine, but a bug-ridden contraption that can do some amazing things. Of course, it would be much better to not feel the need to sob. But sobbing can be used to regain focus if you give yourself the freedom to let loose.
Chemicals banned from air conditioners and refrigerators are making a comeback
> figuring out what people are thinking in person

Have you seen the latest research, where GPT-4 is shown to have "Theory of Mind"-like ability (what people are thinking) at a human 7-year old level?

https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02083
We are getting there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6-rcIjKFFs
> Aquinas' third way

Thank you! This was very interesting to read about. Learned something new today :D
Yes, have thought deeply about this. There is a $19/month option for those who can't afford the lifetime price as it now. And that would include all the tools too when I add more paid tools.

The "SaaS" I would do is make paid versions of the google sheets add-ons and more work on Asa, the AI inside of Google Sheets I made. Right now it's free to use with your own API KEY but I'm working on a paid version.
What is installed in one year has little relevance to what eventual installed capacity will be for solar/wind/nuclear. Once solar/wind becomes a larger amount of installed capacity the immense problems with storage will likely become a huge limiting factor. Have you considered how much storage poland (or any country with large seasonal variation in sun/wind) would actually need for having 50% of it's capacity in solar?
It doesn't take the AI bubble to sense the incredible IBMification of Google. The company can't ship product to save its life, and when it does the product gets canceled or is a duplicated effort of some other internal product.

The AI bubble could steal away 50% of Google's revenue stream by this time next year. Even if Google puts up a similar product, it has to retain 100% of its revenue and margin. Stuffing ads in interleaved responses seems implausible or downright dirty under an entirely new regime of high information density retrieval tools. (Granted, this is probably my weakest argument.)

It remains to be seen if users will flock from "Google search" to "Bing AI" (or whatever), but we all know how shitty Google search has become as a product compared to half a decade ago.
It's a word prediction algorithm. Literally any collection of words (sometimes also known as a fact) it was trained on, regardless of how esoteric or domain specific, should generally be able to be regurgitated and, to a lesser degree, associated with similar collections of words. If you want to see it fail, don't try to "outsmart" it, but simply consider how it's programmed.

---

Me: "continue the sequence: 0, done, 2, free, 4, hive"

ChatGPT 4: "1, sun, 3, tree, 5, drive"

Me: "that's wrong, try again"

ChatGPT 4: "0, done, 2, free, 4, hive, 6, picks, 8, gate"

Me: "that's wrong, try again"

ChatGPT 4: 'I give up.' (paraphrasing the obnoxiously verbose responses it's been trained to prefer)

---

It's a series even a child could complete, but breaks ChatGPT by relying on a pattern of words that aren't explicitly stated. So you get software which can pass the bar, but fail at trivial series.
Anyone not using something like Sonar in their pipelines is really doing themselves a disservice, even with languages considered less bloated like Python, Java, C#, I cannot keep up with all the rules after circa 25 years of ecosystem evolution (less for C#).
You do realize there are already plenty of species on Earth that come out ready to walk, forage, swim etc?
Have you tried using the free tier of Hex (https://www.hex.tech)?
As far as I can understand the abstract (I did not shell out the $29), they register multiple red-shifted and blue-shifted photons, with their frequencies forming the expected stripe-like interference picture. They say: «The separation between time slits determines the period of oscillations in the frequency spectrum», that is, these "stripes" are not separated by space (red and blue circles) but rather by time. That is, the light quickly changes between red / blue shifted, as if we were traveling through the spatial interference picture, not looked at it "from above".

So yes, I think our understanding more or less matches: they likely register red/blue shifted photons with small time delays between the same "colors".
Reading thermometer temperatures over time from a video
The French tax payers have through EDF taken a loss of €5-10B on Olkiluoto 3.

Definitely cheap, if you make someone else pay.
I prefer wired because no batteries, no lost mouse, no lost usb receiver.
What do the strawberries and corn mean?
> So that's at most a few thousand deaths for something like 100 Million reactor hours (napkin math, don't cite).

Sounds about right, but when you factor in current designs and requirements it's 100x better.

LRF (large release frequencies) are required to be less than 1 in 1 000 000 per year of reactor operation [1], so roughly 10 billion reactor hours. The calculation of this considers at least 1 in 10 000 year levels of high winds and earthquakes [2].

Since the typical reactor is 1GW, so ~8TWh per year, and global energy consumption is ~23 000 TWh per year, we could use roughly 3000 reactors globally to meet most of our needs, which would put an event like this roughly every 100-1000 years.

[1] https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0909/ML090910608.pdf

[2] https://archive.opg.com/pdf_archive/Nuclear%20Licencing%20Do...
No your numbers are wrong (1) by an order of magnitude. The cost per smartphone equivalent CPU will be around $1 and that’s for the whole design not the ISA.

[1] tens of millions is wrong and it clearly not true that Arm charges ‘as much as $10’ for an SBC that will cost $40 retail.
Let's explore top mobile game development companies in india 2023.
I got a Sony that is both wired and wireless, really nice!
Sure, it's not ideal, and it would be great if economical recycling techniques are developed, but over their lifetime they produce a whole lot less emissions than most of the alternatives.

If we're going to start counting CO2 emissions in the production of these things, surely every single energy generation technique looks pretty crummy as well.

Btw: I really want SMR to succeed. A mix of solar, wind, SMRs, and a smart grid seems like a great way to go.
> see ones complement

I'm glad you brought this up because is kind of my point. C++ realized this was useless baggage and finally left it behind. [1] I don't see why ptrdiff_t is much different here. C just doesn't want to let things to, I guess. Literally any feature you put into a language will end up being used (or abused) by someone for something. "It's nice" that at some point in the future someone can pick up any random shiny thing once in a while and twirl it around doesn't seem like a reason to keep it into the standard for decades and burden everyone else with it the whole time. (Not to mention there are much nicer things that C and C++ lack, and that would make people's lives easier rather than harder...)

[1] https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p09...
US Justice Department Sues Activision Blizzard for Suppressing Esports Wages
The bevy engine (ECS based) has an `UpdateMode` that specifies "Continuous" vs "Reactive" https://docs.rs/bevy/0.10.1/bevy/winit/enum.UpdateMode.html.

Here's an example using it, it's well suited for "desktop applications", the shorthand to use it is `desktop_app()` https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/1c5c94715cb17cda5ae2....

https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/
One can write slow software in any language, specially easy for those that missed algorithms and data structures lectures.
I think the comment I replied to was referring to normal powerlines for households. Individual solar+batteries is not going to replace high voltage lines.
There's a really neat way to express asymmetric numbers that generalizes from both unsigned numbers and standard 2's complement signed numbers.

It's easiest to explain in terms of how to interpret a particular bitpattern. As the first step, interpret the bitpattern as an unsigned int, u.

If u <= T, for some threshold T, then we are done, the final value is u. If u > T, then we interpret it as the negative number u - UINT_MAX.

T = UINT_MAX gives you the unsigned numbers, and T = INT_MAX gives you the two's complement.

Because of modulus intense handwaving it's also easy to do addition, subtraction and multiplication using this representation.
The C standard macro must expand to _something_. My concern would be that it expands to something like __builtin_foo_nugget instead of unsigned long...
> I'm in perpetuity forced to use GitHub because open source companies and projects choose

Frankly, calling this "forced" comes over to me as a selfish and entitled view of "freedom". Freedom is not unlimited or without conflict. Someone else's freedom to park at a spot means that you can't park there. Someone else's freedom to choose Github means that you can't choose it for them.

> I want open source infrastructure for the open source world [1]. GitHub could put their actions where their mouth is and be and actually open source company.

Okay. Great aspiration. But someone has to do it, and there must be sufficient political power from multiple parties to do it.

Github owes you nothing. Unless you pay, in which case they owe you what is specified in the contract.

The alternative is that either you build this open source infrastructure yourself, or you fund someone to do it. That seems to me like a much better use of your time than complaining that Github isn't doing it for free.

There's a reason why such an open source infra that's superior to the Github ecosystem doesn't exist: because it's hard to build and it takes time and resources. Nobody owes the community this: the community has to be lucky that enough people happen to have the right scratch that they're itching for themselves.
(I'm not GP.) I don't think the question here is whether trauma is mimicking ADHD or ADHD is a result of trauma, either in general, or in any particular case.

I think people lean into the personality traits, 'neurotype', cognitive styles, talents, and inherent tendencies they have as kids when it comes to coping with trauma. You use the tools you have. If you have ADHD and a situation is unbearable, hyperfocus is a tool you have— or at least a pattern you can fall into— that can prevent you from being overwhelmed by the feelings that weigh on you when that situation is on your mind. It would be shocking to me if ADHDers didn't often end up relying on features of ADHD to adapt to traumatic situations.

These things are interrelated in people who have both, and I don't think it's generally easy (or necessary) to pick apart 'which is which' when it comes to a specific behavior or experience.
Its kind of funny to claim 10+ years of fawning press coverage when the reality was that electric cars and by extension Musk go ridiculed and called dangerous and unsafe in the media. The same goes for every little issue with SpaceX.

Coverage of Musk has always been mixed and in main stream media often covered negatively.

Maybe in the more techy press it was mostly positive. But even then, go threw history here on HN. The idea that Tesla was scam and just about to go bankrupt was common wisdom and anybody who disagree got down-voted.

So the idea that positive press coverage is responsible is kind or ridiculous.

Its more like its the endless pro-vs-anti Musk wars that lead to this effect. And that happens in the media as it does on HN.
A What-if?: what if Manchester had not lost out to the US-based computer scene during the mid-XX?
Who is shitting on who? You or me? I am simply offering advice, and experience. Your reaction to it is peculiar.
> The rub here is that while that _feels_ like it's reasoning and has a mental model of arithmetic or cyber-security, it's just predicting what word is most likely to go next.

I have yet to hear a convincing argument that 'reasoning' is any more than simply predicting what comes next. We intuitively think that human intelligence is special, and that somehow we are categorically different to some black box of ones and zeros in any form other than substrate.
IIRC around the same time. Just tested it and scrolling doesn't work on the model 3, you still have to use the touch screen.
I don't get it. What is the correct answer?
How do I test on Safari while building my webapps; I only have a single machine that runs Linux and Windows; and the last Safari release for Windows is from 2015. It was very recent that I came accross a flexbox bug with flex-wrap which had me scrambling to find someone with an iOS device so I could test on Safari and that was pretty painful.

PS; I am not very well off, so buying devices merely for testing on a browser seem pretty overkill.
Dell has some too
Samoyeds are maybe even more amazing, look them up if you haven't