skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Maybe I'm being dense. To me it appears that the standards are telling compiler writers what should be done. In doing so the compilers will become ever more complex and thus bug-prone.

I learnt C back when K&R (first edition) was the reference. Ok, it was hardly much more than a universal assembler to make every computer look like a PDP-11. In my experience C is the language to use when you want to be close to the metal. For the rest I use which ever high-level language/environment is best suited. Admittedly some FFI are a pain to use, but once you get the boilerplate bedded down your much higher level language gets the coordination done.
What's the plenty of evidence? Everyone is basing this on a single news article which essentially said "we spoke to insiders who said he doesn't have any equity".
On one level, it's more enjoyable to do work that's aligned with your values. That gives you "self-actualization" points in the ol' pyramid.

But on another level, either because you're getting equity, or because you'd like to stay employed for a while, "believing" in the company is a shorthand for saying you think that the company is going to succeed, so that your equity is worth more, or so that you don't find yourself out of a job on someone else's schedule.
direly good... mmm you haven't experienced a burn till you've had that white cheese coat your mouth like wax perfectly... and deliciously.
I would say it was an open secret that was a bit dishonest. It’s a little thing that managers can do to keep their employees happy that doesn’t come out of their budget. And in addition to providing a little bonus compensation, it also eliminates a somewhat dehumanizing aspect of having to ask for permission and track time away from the office.

This was many years ago, but I still remember when my manager came by my desk and said “don’t ever submit another PTO request again. I trust you to take as much personal time as you need and still do a great job.” It made me feel valued and respected, which to me was a lot more important than the small cash bonus when I finally did leave (I eventually left when that company was acquired and found that the new company did not value their employees as much).
And this is based on what information? Sounds very theoretical
You're right, but the normal definition of building ownership is a bit weird. Can the company do anything it wants to the building without consulting the bank?
If those slides had said something that contravened CRT rather than summarizing it, I think that'd be a valid argument. But they say almost nothing at all.
If the Firefox version is more than a year old, it’s a bot.
That pricing is... yowch.

> Please try it out...

No, thank you. Not for $100/mo without any sort of trial!

It would be marginally interesting to play with it on my ~8 year blog (https://www.sevarg.net), but I have ~300 posts and ~900k words written.

Dumb question, though... if I put all my content into a single page on a subdomain (easy enough to do, I use Jekyll to render my stuff), would the free plan barf on a 900k word document, or would it happily ingest it?

Also, what does "One chatbot" mean? Only one person can interact with it at a time?
didn't know there was an imos in KC. like 50% of the STL locations are bad the other half amazing. How was the kc version?

With imos you can't go in expecting anything, just enjoy it for what it is.
You can have your foot on the brake even as you hit the wall.
> I predict a Steam-based console comparable to the Xbox or PS5

Theres this perception that the Deck SoC is fully custom (and therefore Valve ordering another from AMD or upgrading it is quite possible).

But the initial capital costs for such a thing are enormous... probably 10 figures if its a big chip on a cutting edge node now. The Deck just doesn't have the kind of volume the PS5/XSX do. Hence this old leak makes me think Van Gogh is a laptop part that OEMs (other than Valve) just didnt pick up:

https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-mobile-apus-for-2021-2022-de...

Same goes for the screen. I dont think Valve is custom ordering the LCDs (otherwise they would be VRR), and they aren't going OLED unless they stumble upon an existing part thats just right. Again, Nintendo is big enough to amortize away a custom OLED.
From near-peer opponents, yes.

But it increases the temptation to use it against weaker opponents.
Jeff Koons Goes to the Moon
"Leonardo da Vinci is the name he has given to one of the 125 “moon phases” in his Moon Phases project—a project that will, among other things, deliver 125 small sculptures via SpaceX rocket and Intuitive Machines lander to the lunar surface later this year."
The general trend is to make new things non-blocking, and discourage use of the old blocking things. (Hence stuff like <script async> and ES 'import' declarations.) If you’re writing greenfield, you don’t really have to worry about any of this: new developers who aren’t working on legacy code could be taught about only the non-blocking way of doing things and never even know these problems exist.
As someone who's been in and out of work and in and out of contracts throughout their life, this sort of thing is utterly baffling to me.

I simply cannot fathom a person who spends ~all of their life at work. I don't think a single year of my adult life has been spent with over 40 weeks at work, most of them have been 30 or even less.

I use unpaid time off a ton, the entire point of me earning more than minimum wage is that it's efficient so that I can work less.
I wonder why that parameter is called "h"? Hmmm ...

Why not just say the word "hysteresis" and bring some magnets to class for show-and-tell to help your students develop an intuition for the "h" parameter in RNNs.
Peoplebox (YC S22) Is Hiring
yes but how did you come up N weeks number though. That was the problem i had with previous jobs with unlimited.
> What got this whole thing weird is that C doesn't like zero sized objects, but implementations were allowed to return a unique pointer for a zero sized allocation.

Some of the windows API's work like this, so how much is pressure from MS?

Same discussion from 7 months ago.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32352965

https://thephd.dev/c23-is-coming-here-is-what-is-on-the-menu...

https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2897.htm

Pattern matching ram for variables/objects whilst they exist even if zero'ed or prefilled with a value doesnt give perfect security. Random values would make it harder to work out the variable/object.
It does suck that physical interfaces are going away, but I feel like there's still a real & interesting challenge to let people use their own user agent, rather than just become reliant on whatever premade jumble of systems a car happens to cook up for itself.
You can't claim "wait times" as a positive of letting a bunch of people die or go bankrupt

Quality is just not true
NB. Cannot enable remote debugging if using Chrome in Guest mode on ChromeOS. Why is left as question for the reader.

A more universal solution, one that does not require enabling websockets, is a localhost-bound forward proxy where HTTP traffic, including cookies, is saved in log files. No need to copy/paste with a GUI or mouse. Can use standard UNIX utilities to work with log files.
Is that faster though? Can your Ruby/PHP/Python running on the server really do the conditional rendering faster than the JavaScript running in the browser?
Completely agreed. Plus, people seem to hate every “celebrity” these days. Name one ceo or founder who is not hated.
I wish UB were only as nasty as "nondeterministic behavior". In fact, if there's UB in anything the compiler sees, nothing at all can be assumed, including whether you even get an output. What you've given the compiler isn't C, so it doesn't have any obligations to do anything with it. The codepath with UB doesn't have to run for the nuclear rockets to launch and the nasal demons to appear.

Since approximately every nontrivial program ever written has UB, in actual practice we're only saved by the fact that compilers aren't entirely maliciously compliant.
I wonder if this fish will be crucial to the survival of life on Earth, if the climate change gets out of control. I would imagine the conditions at the deepest levels of the ocean won't change much, allowing their natural habitat to continue.
You can discard data on this point from the USA because our mask mandates were weak — N95 not required even in medical offices — and compliance was always poor at best.
What powers do you think the BJP has that the WEF doesn't?
If eastern Germany is still affordable like that then it might be for a reason. Don't move there unless you pass as a German and speak the language.
There a lots of tiny issues: some UI settings like rulers (or whatever PyCharm calls them, vertical guides that tell you when you’re at 100 chars or something) just don’t work, and don’t show up in the main editor (but they show up in the diffs!). Some editor settings, like the main Python settings pane, just doesn’t load its settings page, and requires restarting the editor. Scrolling diffs with the scroll wheel is so janky and laggy to be unusable, but the main editor scrolls fine. Reconnecting after a short disconnect (open and close laptop lid) takes too long. The git client gets itself into a weird state sometimes where it will create the same 5 files no matter which branch I switch to, and the only way I’ve found to reset that is to delete every trace of IntelliJ off the remote and reconnect.
Unempathic people can make hard decisions; Such as choosing between spending a hospital budget on fuel for the generators, building upkeep, restocking, and employee wages –v.s. the life of one child.
A lot of people can't make such a decision.

I wouldn't want such people unchecked though.
I’m not poo-pooing it. It’s great to see someone take initiative. I’m just saying if you’re wondering how to use GPT to do this, this is how. Build it yourself in a couple hours or buy the service, I don’t care.

Just sharing the details for those that are curious in how to make their own chatbot on their data.
Why do I have hundreds of watches and phones connected to my health app devices?
Yes, technically it will index everything if it's just a single page. Some people have already started abusing it like that. I need to put in place some restrictions for that.

Assume you have multiple products. You can't give the content of both these websites to a single chatbot, right? For example, if someone asks chatbot about "What's the pricing", should it give the pricing of first product or second product?

In cases like this, it makes sense to create multiple chatbots (one chatbot for each website) and keep the content separate.
I'd be interested also. I would have guessed more the unions...longshoreman unions seem unusually powerful.
This is wrong. Vancouver was never “affordable”. My family
moved to Vancouver in the mid-80s and it was by far the most expensive place in Canada. Prices had already climbed rapidly by the time we got there and prices never crashed for 40 years. At worst, it was flat for a few years.

Our 1000 sqft house in the West End was almost 300k in the mid-80s and our family was struggling financially but we were in the best school district so my parents made the sacrifice. It was almost double the price of a much larger house in suburbs of Toronto.

East Van was cheaper but still expensive relative to other cities. Vancouver house prices has always been a mystery because there is no inherent industry to pay for it. Locals blamed Asians but Germans were larger demographic in terms of immigrants but you couldn’t identify them as easily.
It's not the job of the government, it's the job of citizens. Citizens MAY outsource parts of this to governments, but we primarily need labor and the working class to have the majority of economic power.

https://libcom.org/library/workers-control-wage-system-ideas...

I'm dedicating my life to building for-profit commercial cooperatives based on this simple principle of voluntary association.
Interesting. Mind sharing how you’re doing the “training”? Search across a vectorstore all the text gets stored in?
Browsers like Firefox could hypothetically kill cookies in their browser tomorrow but doesn't. Or at least make a big stink about it. Do you think they should? Do you think we'd be better off as a society?
> That could be addressed by making home building a priority and by relaxing regulations like zoning. Allow more infill.

Unfortunately, it seems like incentives aren't aligned with the people responsible for zoning and regulation, for that to happen.

Incumbent homeowners for whatever reason are better organized at mobilizing around their political interests
So are you not paying attention to ChatGPT?
Dynamo Dream Episode 2
My experience is mostly with PHP, but the answer to your question is almost always yes.
Based on the comments in here (and on related stories) I think the US transportation conversation needs to change in some way.

Mostly, it's a lot of people complaining about cars. Which is fine, I mostly agree. But the anti-car stuff is becoming extremely toxic and parroting half-remembered tweets about induced demand, finding slightly different ways to describe cars as death machines, and good old-fashioned liberal American self-flagellation.

We're past the point where it's transgressive to point out the problems with cars, we need to actually have some kind of a sensible discussion that involves practical considerations. In particular, anti-car people need to have a good handle on why people actually like cars. Otherwise, it'll just be more of trying to punish people, like the guy in this thread who says "the key to this morass to make car owners suffer". We've got to do better than that!
Google, Meta, and Netflix are part of a small elite group of innovative and successful tech companies of our time. They have made a name for themselves in business and technology.

But what can we learn from them?
When you train a NN, you train until the loss converges (or until you run out of money). If it happens that you exhaust your training data and the loss is still decreasing, then yes you keep going with a second epoch. On the other hand, if your loss has already converged then starting a new epoch on the same data is just burning money.

In any case this wouldn’t be a data size scale but a model size scale. Model size scaling has its own set of limits, such as the aforementioned inference times. It seems safe to assume that OpenAI chose data and model size values for GPT-4 that were basically as big as they could go.

We don’t know anything about GPT-4 or how it is trained or what the training data is, so from that perspective anything we can say about it is unfounded speculation. This is an important asterisk to any discussion of it.
The problem I run into when I finally go through my e-waste (usually when moving house) is that I no longer have any devices capable of operating the thing I'm recycling.

Last time around it was IDE drives.
Citation needed. Depends on how big of a multi you are talking about.
I know way more people with $1-10M who did it via corporate ladder climbing through FAANG than I do people who struck it big with a startup. At a certain point the balance is in favor of start ups but I suspect the number is somewhere in the 8 figure range which is correspondingly rare.
The stove I learned on had numbers from 1 to 10... so medium was 5... eg half way through. 1 was marked low, and 10 high. This deduction has worked just fine for me for the next 40 years of cooking. Is it wrong? who cares... it worked. The books always talked about high, medium and low. Not hard, I figured it out at 6 when I wanted to make an omlette and my mom gave me 2 cartons of eggs, cream, julia child and the trash can.

The trash can was actually the biggest part of the lesson, don't be afraid of failure.
Perhaps Wrinkles Cause Aging, Not the Other Way Around
Different. Super-intelligence is a plausibly reachable thing, a question of engineering. TIL is an uncertain thing, requires entirely new physics, and completely unknown tech.
And UB has always been an excuse for compilers to screw over programmers in hideous ways

Your reply was great up until this. Compiler writers aren’t looking to screw over programmers, they’re looking to make code faster. UB gives them the ability to make assumptions about what is and is not true, at a particular moment in time, in order to skip doing unnecessary work at runtime.

By assuming that code is always on the happy path, you can cut a lot of corners and skip checks that would otherwise greatly slow down the code. Furthermore, these benefits can cascade into more and more optimizations. Sometimes you can have these large, complicated functions and call graphs get optimized down to a handful of inlined instructions. Sometimes the speedup can be so dramatic that the entire application is unusable without it!

Many of these optimizations would be impossible if compilers were forced to assume the opposite: that UB will occur whenever possible.

The tool programmers have available to them is compiler flags. You can use flags to turn off these assumptions, at the cost of losing out on optimizations, if your code needs it and you’re unable to fix it. But it’s better to turn on all possible warnings and treat warnings as errors, rather than ignoring them, to push yourself to fix the code.
They absolutely do have an open source enclosure.
>> Your COPY-PASTE example is nonsensical as already pointed out.

But will you explain why it is nonsensical? Because that has not yet been pointed out.

Lest you forget, here is what the OP said that I replied to:

>> when i show the output that clearly demonstrates reasoning and understand, the arguments quickly shift to "it's not real understanding!" and it's honestly very bizarre.

I also showed "output" that "clearly demonstrates reasoning and understand[ing]". Why is that nonsensical?

Edit: although it won't be very helpful to discuss this if you're not the OP and don't make the same assumptions as they. But go ahead anyway.
If AI can chip away at your meaning of being human I am afraid your definition and understanding before is in need of improvement. Destroying a faulty understanding should be celebrated, not feared.
Once you get to the top of the waiting list.
Prusa doesn’t help himself here though. He then says he needs a new license, to replace the one manufacturers are supposedly ignoring?
There's always a number beyond which you cannot say no, regardless of your personal beliefs. Heck Stewart's investors and co-founders would have themselves overruled him if he hadn't pulled the trigger. And you have to think of all your employees whose lives you can change. $28B is a ludicrous amount of money.
Certainly not. Some is merciful and – in the case of dignified deaths – by old and modern laws, totally consensual as well. Sometimes death is appropriate even if it’s not what was hoped for.

It’s not an easy distinction to make by any means, but it’s a distinction that humans have believed to exist for millennia at least.
It's quite a common pattern, we did the same thing years ago using RMQ to achieve eventually consistent cache invalidation.
Let's forget the slides for now. In hindsight I think I made a mistake in bringing them into the conversation, since I was just trying to use them to demonstrate something which you agree with anyway–but I didn't realise that when I brought them up.

This is your comment to which I was responding:

> I'd be much more amenable to that if the people "appropriating" terms like CRT weren't doing so to tar actual CRT theorists, but they are, so I'm not at all amenable to it in this case.

And then you said (my emphasis):

> I don't dispute that there are misguided K-8 schools that have been teaching CRT, or what they think CRT is

Doesn't your statement support the idea that "CRT" has evolved in popular usage to mean something different from the original academic theory, and that evolution hasn't purely been due to CRT critics, people who promote/teach "what they think CRT is" have also played a role in that evolution? And hence, that evolution can't be solely blamed on people trying to "tar actual CRT theorists"? Which undermines your argument for resisting it.
I think that if the OP were an accrual basis taxpayer they would already know how to handle this situation, since accrual-basis accounting is opt-in for individuals and S-corporations.

Note to other reply: estimated tax payments are made during the year. While you can net out expenses, if income is distributed unequally during the year this can result in penalties/interest if you underpay in one quarter based on the liability as calculated after the year ends (to complicate things, there are multiple ways to estimate tax payments during the year to account for these situations).
Yes we'd be better off if cookies were removed.

But if it was only Firefox, people would simply add banners saying "Firefox is not supported." since it's only like 3% of marketshare these days.
this was basically the mentality that lead to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dekulakization

it did not go well. It did not go well for either the richer (murdered) people or the poorer (ensuing famine) people: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1930%E2%80%93...
I don't know either. Probably some combination of subsidies/taxes/income/wages
Admittedly there are a lot of variables here, and this may not be a fair test at all, but it's interesting to me that Firefox on Windows loads many web pages much faster (relative to Chrome) than Firefox on Linux loads those same web pages (according to Mozilla's own metrics).

Take a look at IMDb, Imgur, LinkedIn, Netflix, Outlook, Twitter, Wikipedia on the following pages. In all these cases, using Chrome's performance as a benchmark, Firefox performs worse on Linux (often significantly) than it does on Windows. I didn't see any cases where Linux performs significantly better than Windows.

https://arewefastyet.com/win10/warm-page-load/overview?numDa...

https://arewefastyet.com/linux64/warm-page-load/overview?num...

Wikipedia is a shocking case (because it's such a simple site). Chrome loads Wikipedia in about the same time on Linux as it does on Windows (unsurprisingly). Firefox takes almost three times longer!

Again, I don't have any way to get enough data to verify these numbers. They might be incorrect. But if Mozilla's performance metrics for Firefox on Linux are screwy, then doesn't it speak in favor of OP's point that nobody has looked into the issue and fixed it?
That ride is a puke machine. I was talking to one of the workers and they said their main job is cleaning up puke all day.

I loved it.
Well, I moved to Linux for good now that I can play most of my Steam and GoG libraries on Linux.

I don't use a Steam deck, but its success makes Linux a viable alternative for me.

Now... If a lot of people play on Linux (either directly like me or indirectly through Steam Deck), why would devs not make games directly for Linux instead?
The author also has a long running web fiction about AI taking over the world. It is hilarious and provides a deep insight into modern religious cults.
Or, the first time I've booted this computer in >1 yr.
How does it train on your site though? Embeddings ?
Why would it collapse? There’s insatiable demand for extreme limited property. Interest rate hikes may lower the price of property but the interest will rise proportionately.

Do people really think at sone point no one will want premium property and I’ll finally get it cheap? Of course that will never happen.
the thing that makes UB almost malicious is that it propagates inter-procedurally. This makes reasoning about code with UB basically impossible which means that you should always assume that the compiler is going to screw you over if you use it because there is no way to know whether it will.