skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Given that Musk is currently also engaged in a lawsuit over the promotion of DOGE...

https://www.reuters.com/legal/elon-musk-seeks-end-258-billio...

> In an evening filing in Manhattan federal court, lawyers for Musk and his electric car company Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) called the lawsuit by Dogecoin investors a “fanciful work of fiction” over Musk’s “innocuous and often silly tweets” about Dogecoin.

> The lawyers said the investors never explained how Musk intended to defraud anyone or what risks he concealed, and that his statements such as “Dogecoin Rulz” and “no highs, no lows, only Doge” were too vague to support a fraud claim.

> “There is nothing unlawful about tweeting words of support for, or funny pictures about, a legitimate cryptocurrency that continues to hold a market cap of nearly $10 billion,” Musk’s lawyers said. “This court should put a stop to plaintiffs’ fantasy and dismiss the complaint.”

... this seems ill advised and likely to add material for the lawsuit.
My guess is if you look at the usage statistics "watching a video all the way to the end" is one of the single strongest signals that a person might be willing to watch the same thing a second time.
Well, from my experience in a partially automated factory 'wrangling the robots' I would do a little foray into 'things that can go wrong'. Our robot arms would periodically have 'robot revolt parties'. Watched a robot arm reach up and push a compressor right off a ten foot dead nest. It didn't drop it or fumble, it cleanly swept it right off. So many small things could trigger problems and sometimes the fixes were odd, like one robot refused to reset unless you opened and closed a certain one of the cage doors despite having done the proper reset process in the computer.
What’s it going to take to get Hacker News commenters to stop perpetuating the myth that trademark holders are required to be litigious assholes if they don’t want their trademarks to lapse?
Thanks, that indeed worked!

This and using conda in wsl2, instead on bare windows
Another thing that happens is being born in a place that does birthdays on a lunar calendar, and then immigrating to a place that uses gregorian/solar, and needing to come up with a birthday in the new system.
You are unfortunately right. But most people don't realize that.
All post-classical effects in quantum field theory arise from various "corrections" that come from what you could define as virtual particles, whether it's from the perturbative treatment or a numerical lattice gauge calculation. In the latter, you need to (formally) sum over all possible field configurations, the majority of which will contain half-witted weird off-shell "particles" and the entire spectrum between stuff you'd never see as a particle and the classical resonances.

It is more clearly visualized in a perturbative expansion, for sure, but it's a bit disingenous I think to argue that there are no virtual particles in a lattice calculation.
ColossalChat: An Open-Source Solution for Cloning ChatGPT with a RLHF Pipeline
As a kid that grew up on the south plains (Texas panhandle). I have a love hate relationship with those windmills. On the one hand it's neat seeing all that green power generation. On the other, it does ruin the landscape to some extent, it can be visually jarring to be driving some back road, go over a rise that, and be smack in the middle of a wind farm. It also can be a little distracting at night, where the darkness is awashed in blinking red lights.
I have no knowledge of the algorithm

I do however watch “Picard make it so (let it snow)” every year. Some videos I’ll watch more than once throughout the year.

On the other hand it’s rare I’ll watch a Numberphile or Tom Scott video more than once, and when I do I deliberately seek it out
Because often no one remembers what the initial process was supposed to do in the first place, and if the original objective was a bad one, automating it makes it far worse. Example: a publication system vendor left a QA procedure that said "put a space character in the front of all these attribute values when they start with alpha". So the team methodically and wrist-slashingly hand-coded thousands of XML files so that they all had leading whitespace in their attributes. When I came on board, I didn't automate that process out of the gate, because leading whitespace in attributes is f@#ng dumb. If I did, I would have caused a lot more problems downstream - so this was a simple process that needed to really die, or at least get explained. Which, turns out, it did have an explanation: the vendor didn't understand how the FOSI print formatter worked, but they had this workaround that seemed to work, so they handed it down. The real problem was being caused by a mishandling of the entire element in the data structure, which was a much bigger deal.
With Pillar (YCS21) | Full-time | 100% REMOTE With Pillar is a healthcare infrastructure startup. We build care management software for health coaching, health advocacy and more / withpillar.com

I am the Head of Engineering and I'm hiring a designer engineer / a designer who codes / a frontend engineer with exceptional design chops.

For now, I need someone that can step up our design system and ship frontend UX consistently. Lots of foundational code to be built across data grids, forms and state-machine powered experiences.

Lots of dynamic / interpreted data-first UI / realtime UIs to be built (Our clients can customize any part of the experience). Admin Interface is a first-class features at Pillar!

I am looking for a self-starter that works in autonomy from a product brief to production and QA.

Close mentorship from me (expect to level up really fast!).

If everything goes well this person could transition to own our entire SDK and frontend vertical. We are widget first and offer our pluggable modules on the front-office and back-office experiences. We need our widgets to work on any frameworks. So there is a lot to do to industrialize our frontend strategy!

Techs: Full typescript / trpc / zod / xstate/ react-hook-form/ chakra (we want to migrate to tailwind or stitches)

Process: Intro call / Technical discussion + design Review / Executive Call / Offer. No Leetcode B.S but a technically demanding (albeit short) process.

Internship, Contract or Contract to Hire depending on XP. Can be located in North America / Canada / Western Europe

To apply: YCombinator in subject line +resume + design xp / inspirations to tim AT our domain name above.
> yet so many are wearing frowns.

I think the phrase "if it seems to good to be true it probably is" is one way (among many) to interpret the scepticism.

I think that it's easy to jump to conclusions about the implications of this technology. Towards either over-optimism or over-pessimism.

Expect the worst and welcome the best seems as good approach as any?
Ok, you’ve completely changed your comment several times now and I’m not going to keep updating mine in response. I’m currently responding to some survey of NeurIps participants regarding long run (negative) effects of advanced AI on humanity.

A weighted average of 5% expecting something really bad in the long run doesn’t concern me personally, and it’s a hypothetical concern that is not actionable. I’ll be concerned when there exists a well-defined issue to address with concrete actions. I’m already concerned about the development of AI likely resulting in everything on the internet needing to be tied to a personal identity to be distinguishable from spam, but I’m also confident we’ll find a good solution to the problem.
well, I'm the only one with access to the cluster and I didn't do it, with Lens IDE I barely check the Nodes tab, I checked the Nodes because I noticed no app pods were scheduling in such node and I found it cordoned.
> And it is absolutely as comfy as pjs.

While I totally get a suit can be properly tailored, you should seriously look into improving your pajamas.

If it doesn't let your arms move their absolute full range without sliding up and down you've already have a big issue and should look into stretchier and probably softer fabrics. Breathability should also be miles ahead of 3~4 stacked layers of fabrics.

Cheaping out on pajamas is absolutely a waste.
Or, between 4 and 5 of 30 on the front page, which is consistent with the state of the front page when I checked earlier. So AI submissions are not being upvoted more or less frequently than other topics, but they do account for about 15 percent of submissions based on super spotty data.
Interestingly on Feb 13th it was already reported [0] LangChain was in talks with Benchmark about a Seed round.

https://www.theinformation.com/articles/benchmark-expected-t...
I kinda wonder what is gonna happen to them when they reach end of life.

Knowing the history of these kinds of things, they will be left to rot and dangle in the fields they were planted.
Stretchable wearable bioelectronic system for monitoring and treatment of wounds
The rules are pretty clear that you can only trade resource cards. When they say things like "However, you cannot give away cards, or trade matching resources (“trade” 3 ore for 1 ore, for example)" and "You cannot trade or give away development cards", it's pretty obvious what the intent is.
Probably people posting some helpful information about that?
Is it no longer possible to just have a nice open source project without a company existing around it?
Abstract

Chronic nonhealing wounds are one of the major and rapidly growing clinical complications all over the world. Current therapies frequently require emergent surgical interventions, while abuse and misapplication of therapeutic drugs often lead to an increased morbidity and mortality rate. Here, we introduce a wearable bioelectronic system that wirelessly and continuously monitors the physiological conditions of the wound bed via a custom-developed multiplexed multimodal electrochemical biosensor array and performs noninvasive combination therapy through controlled anti-inflammatory antimicrobial treatment and electrically stimulated tissue regeneration. The wearable patch is fully biocompatible, mechanically flexible, stretchable, and can conformally adhere to the skin wound throughout the entire healing process. Real-time metabolic and inflammatory monitoring in a series of preclinical in vivo experiments showed high accuracy and electrochemical stability of the wearable patch for multiplexed spatial and temporal wound biomarker analysis. The combination therapy enabled substantially accelerated cutaneous chronic wound healing in a rodent model.
I find it kinda annoying. It's like a slow inaccurate autocomplete that doesn't always work.

I'm kinda puzzled why people are so excited about it, and honestly wondering if there is something wrong in my setup, or if I'm using it wrong. I have been using it for a couple of weeks now, but no improvement, and also tried quite a few strategies.

It's "ok-ish" with boilerplate-y stuff, but it's not reliable. Same as you mention; I'm quicker writing code with normal TS autocomplete than having to fix the sometimes subtle bugs it writes.
Can’t speak to parent comment. But I started a business 20 years ago and I lived in my business partners moms basement. He lived in his old room - this no rent. This lasted 2 years in my early 20s. I’d guess anyone paying rent bootstrapping is doing something similar or the business is paying rent in some way.
In my time at Google, I saw numerous projects completed that a whole army of me could never complete (according to the required standards). There are many such problems where throwing more bodies at it won't help; genuine insight is necessary. I'm surprised you haven't encountered this.
Genesis Market provided access to a wide list of services with user accounts from all over the world. Among them were Gmail, Facebook, Netflix, Spotify, WordPress, PayPal, Reddit, Amazon, LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Twitter, Zoom, and Ebay.

This is why 'strong passwords' will never be good enough when hackers simply control the actual session
At first glance, it looks like they have twenty sponsors donating for them to host some kind of public hackathon.
I think his point is: taking a teaspoon of water out of the ocean and bolding marching back into town proclaiming you fought ocean level rise is a little disingenuous.
In what sense you not reply? No reply link? I noticed missing reply links on comments that are deeply nested. What you could do in this case is click the time link on a particular comment and you'll get to the reply form. Hope this helps.
I'm actually quite in favor of, essentially, a minimum VAT tax. The US demands that good manufacturing pays some reasonable level of VAT taxes (let's say 10% as an example). If Apple builds a laptop in China they value at 300$ (paying 45$ in VAT to China) and then ship it over to Bermuda to "endow it with their brand" adding 1700$ to the value and paying a VAT tax of .5% then, once it arrives at US shores, we simply bar the good entry until 9.5% of 1700$ is surrendered to the US government to account for VAT dodging.

It's an incredibly easy way to close a whole bunch of tax loopholes at once.
Also a typo in the alt text & wonky css that leads to weird stretching when the aspect ratio is not the same as the intern's who put up the page.
You’re welcome :-). I used to have a few other similar things bookmarked, but now that I’m checking them, the rest seem to be discontinued.
>> We don't really know how they work inside.

Yes, we do. We know their design principles, their operation principles, the designs of specific instances, and everything else that has anything to do with "how they work inside". We know how they work inside. We know how they work inside and out.

What we can't do is predict their output, given some input (i.e. a prompt). That's because Large Language Models are so, well, large, and complex, that it's impossible to reproduce their calculations without ... a Large Language Model. In the same way, we can't predict the output of a Random Number Generator. Very much like a large language model, we know how an RNG works, but if we could predict its behaviour, then it wouldn't be working correctly.

But why is the inability to predict the behaviour of a complex system reason to imagine all sorts of mysterious and fantastical things happening inside the system, such as it "thinking", or "developing some kind of internal world model"? Those are not things that language models, small or large, are designed to do, and there is no obvious reason why they should be able to do them. There is no reason to assume they can do them either: the fact that they are models of language, trained to reproduce language, and nothing else, suffices to explain their observed behaviour.

There are no mysteries of intelligence, or artificial intelligence, to uncover in the study of large language models' behaviour. I am perfectly well aware that there are many people who absolutely want there to be such mysteries, there, and that will overlook everything we know about how language models actually work, to be able to fantasise about those mysteries.

But those are fantasies. They are superstitions. Superstitious beliefs about an artifact of technology, that we have created ourselves, and that some of us have now chosen to revere and wonder at as if it was an artifact of an alien civilisation fallen from the sky.

Also, on a personal note: not you too, Animats... come on, you're a knowledgeable one. Don't just get swept up in the crowd's madness like that.
Archived: https://archive.ph/ynKE8
None of this should be an issue if there was a judge in the loop.
I once read an article somewhere about how he spent huge amounts of time thoroughly playtesting the entire game with his children. This is what made the game balanced and easy to grasp.

My favorite mechanic is the way each dice roll potentially gives everyone at the table some sort of payoff. This keeps everyone at the table engaged and paying attention.

You only come up with mechanics like this if you put in the time playtesting.

[*] RIP
It only seems ridiculous framed from the modern perspective on computing. Ask this in 1995 and yes, this would be the best interface. The only reason why its no good anymore is because these abstraction layers we shovel into people. Maybe in 2005 the best way to view the talmud was a gui based native app, because thats the level of abstraction layer people where shoveled versus the command line. Maybe in 2015 the best way moved from a native app to a website, since thats now how most people operate by then, not installing tools themselves but just going to different websites and therefore losing that knowledge. Maybe today the best way is a mobile app, because people don't even visit desktop websites anymore and don't take well to those design philosophies.

You have to wonder where this is marching off too, this march away from complexity into easier and simpler abstractions, further from the magic and raising the ivory tower of the wizard who makes these tools higher above the masses who increasingly have no idea what is happening nor any mental model to think about this stuff as it actually works. Certainly some groups benefit from siloing the knowledge of fire of our modern world, but I can't help but imagine we are all losing in this race away from complexity.
People want to eat.
They also had the authority to do so with little to no oversight.
Do you have some other examples where 1509 custom summonses were abused, but the abuse didn't get enough attention? This is honestly the first I've heard of them:

> The 1509 customs summons is an administrative subpoena explicitly and exclusively meant for use in investigations of illegal imports or unpaid customs duties under a law known as Title 19 US Code 1509. Its goal is to provide agencies like ICE with a way to obtain business records from companies without having to go to a judge for a warrant.

> The subpoena-tracking database that WIRED obtained offers the most detailed breakdown of how ICE has been using the customs summons to date. The data shows that between January 4, 2016, and August 22, 2022, ICE issued 172,679 summonses, averaging more than 70 per day. Half of these were sent to telecommunications companies like AT&T, T-Mobile, and Comcast. Big technology companies like Google, Meta, and Microsoft collectively received nearly 15,000 summonses. Of the thousands of summonses sent to social media companies, Meta and Snapchat make up the vast majority.
In my experience the only thing that really works is "don't recommend this channel" option in the ellipsis menu, however recently I must have reached some limit because it is now showing me channels I've already blocked. My guess would be somewhere between 50~100 is the limit for blocked channels.
That's why I'm surprised they only include one USB-C port. If you use that for power input can't use it for anything else. I expect machines released in 2023 to have at least two especially if it supports USB-C power input.
Very sad news.

Unrelated, the website claims this cookie is "legitimate interest" and so can't be disabled:

Receive and use automatically-sent device characteristics for identification: Always Active

Why do they need to identify a logged out visitor?
I was pretty disappointed when they cancelled mobile Dr. Mario. That said, I think aggressively maintaining control is probably the best move - mobile is a race to the bottom, where you smother gameplay with pay-to-play and/or ads.
That's fair! At a minimum, we probably should start saying "Type.ai" more often than just "Type."
Nowadays when you search lol its always league of legends when it used to be lot of laughs*. They are afraid one of this games becomes super popular and when you search monster on google there is not a single monster energy drink to be seen

Edit: * or laughing out loud
TD Becomes Biggest Bank Short with $3.7B on the Line
Well humans have adapted, just as they have adapted to every technological development. There are tons of jobs out there with shortages e.g paramedics, nurses, teachers, engineering, plumbers, electricians, construction etc. People will end up doing these jobs if that's the only way they can make a living. It does majorly, majorly suck for everyone whose dream it was to have one of the creative jobs that are being replaced. I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying it's probably what is going to happen.
Looks great on mobile, too. https://ibb.co/hBG7sgL
Just wait until they find out about the increasingly popular "Pocket Monsters" game series. It's all the kids ever talk about these days!
Sadly the beacon of balanced reporting that the BBC once was is now a distant memory. It's politicised, click bait nonsense just like most of the news on the Internet. So your assessment is more than likely accurate.
I just deleted my comment on the last thread from a month ago with the button.
The problem with DRF being an external package is that it does thing slightly different than Django itself would do it.

DRF’s validators don’t implement `__eq__`, Serializers doesn’t implement `serializer._meta.fields` on the base class (you have to instantiate the serializer to access anything other than `declared_fields`), lack of async view support, and on and on.

I find DRF grating and would pay anything to have an official Django REST api contrib package.
If you do one a year from 18 to 30 that's an even dozen.
Everyone projects their difficulties on to you, so here's mine:

A specification can be rigorous, structured, precise and formal: a declarative description of what is to be done - not how. It is a very different perspective from designing algorithms - even one that proves the thing to be done, is done.

But I think trusting the results is misplaced. It's more like being a partner in a law firm, where the articled clerks do all the work - but you are responsible. So you'd better check the work. And doing that efficiently is an additional skill set.
Totally agree. The number one rule of (most) startups is that everything takes infinitely longer than you would imagine. And then, even longer than that still...
I spat out my drink when I read the part about using solar panels to power the lights.... come on people. The cost to build and maintain these (replacing pumps, replacing lights, cleaning glass, preventing growth of bacteria or mold being pumped in through air, draining biowaste, replacing fertilizer) is going to be many orders of magnitude more costly than planting a tree.
Many people use Youtube for music, and that lends itself pretty strongly to repeated watches. It could be the algorithm doesn't perfectly differentiate between music watching habits and non-music watching habits, and applies lessons from one to the other.
From my perspective few of the projects asking for this level of experience require it. I have no idea why people aren't recruiting curious randos off the street at $60k a pop, but I'd imagine that onboarding looks complicated if you can't tell the difference between infrastructure jank and your actual job.
I love the random Canadian flag in there, because apparently every other country's police forces' crest should be recognizable to everyone on the internet, but the Canadians ones are just too obscure.
Sleight-of-hand magic trick only fools monkeys with opposable thumbs
You trust judges to do the right thing? The time period that this happens encompasses both Trump and Biden - meaning you can’t trust the government not to trample your rights no matter who is in power.
I agree it's a game changer. I also think once I get access to copilot x I'll find it irresistible.

Something about the iterative context aware approach of chat helps me think through the problem. The only think I don't like about copilot is how you cant tell it to augment the output. Sometimes it's close but not perfect.
But there is no logic or legal ground for trademarking the word "monster" or the green/white colours in a logo. It is all about bullying smaller companies using their much higher budget.