skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You do realize that the difference between Intel and TSMC is marginal? Without TSMC your phones and laptops (if you buy the new MacBooks) will run a little hotter/slower/heavier (to get the same battery life). Sure in a market economy businesses are won on the margins. So in a sense Taiwan is a much greater threat to US chip dominance than China is. If chips are all that you care about you are risking your entire country to protect your true chip nemesis. The more believable your deterrence is, the less likely the industry will come back to the US. Quite a paradox.
Does it compile AoT or are you stuck with Julia start time?
> a legal system that doesn't allow them to just ban a specific company.

Which can be overruled by national security issues, I suppose.
Before even deciding between those choices, we should at least stop the problem continuing, by preventing so many prescriptions for opioids being given out to people in pain. The government should prosecute the likes of Purdue for their aggressive targeting of people in pain.

It won't happen though, because of regulatory capture, and general lobbying / corruption.
Basically, yes. It's fentanyl residue in some level of the chain after multiple steps of purchase-cut-resell.

At some layer of the long winding black market route, people will be cutting drugs with any sort of lacing to increase profits, they might be dealing with multiple different kinds of drugs in high volume and use fentanyl to cut their heroin/opiates to get more potency out of less product. When using some tool that wasn't cleaned properly and still has residues of fentanyl (which has a ridiculous high ratio of potency vs dosage) it ends up getting mixed into other drugs.
To be fair, humans have the benefit of millions (billions?) of years of evolution.
Big fan of Weaviate.
What's funny is that when my wife became pregnant I had a near panic to find a place so I could have a dedicated area to focus. And we closed on that very house last week. Our baby is only one month old, but I can already feel what you are talking about. Where we are now is basically one giant room, and I actually like it so far. Whoops. Well, at least the "study" in the new house is a large converted garage that has room for office and an extra living room. I've struggled with remote work with the concept of sleeping where I work, so at least this will fix that, and when the time comes we'll have a dang bedroom for her. Not sure we need three living rooms though, that'll be a lot of play areas!
> pay for compute by the second and storage by the byte. Very simple, transparent [...] Some of the ETL companies have tried to charge by number of rows loaded. That just feels too arbitrary to me, more disconnected from value incurred and quite risky.

Did you typo that the wrong way around? #rows seems way more connected to 'value incurred' for ETL than compute time to me. 'We help you load data, you pay by how much data you load' vs. 'we help you load data, you pay by how long it takes us'!
Why would you assume they have a blanket policy?

It’s much more likely that the big4, who have been doing the same thing for 100+ years, just applies their normal system when evaluating new clients- what is their ability to perform the work, what is their risk to the firm.

The fact is that they haven’t been audited. Financial regulation is set up so you don’t have to speculate or assume why this doesn’t occur. If it doesn’t occur, that’s bad from a risk mitigation standpoint.

Since crypto firms are logical entities that know the benefits of auditing and they have lots of funding and can afford it, it seems more likely that they don’t audit because they have bad books.

The threat to accounting firms by regulators is that if they audit incorrectly and attest to incorrect things then they will be shut down.
A want driver doesn’t have to emerge, it could be a fitness function programmed by a human.

Evolution by natural selection has shaped our desires and motivations, but with a LLMs I would be willing to bet that people are already intentionally experimenting with imbuing them with patters that mimic human wants.
I don't accept the premise that biological life is doomed by superintelligent machines, why would it be?

But there is risk, obviously, which needs to be addressed, yet, quite predictably, in order of concerns, competition for profits or geopolitical advantage is coming first. And second, third, ...
The first demo in a LONG time that I shared with friends.

Insane. I‘m a fanboy. Didn’t think that would happen either. This is absolutely brilliant. The Gen Z voice is just soooooo good.
Agile Project Forecasting – The Monte Carlo Method (2015)
>How exactly does anyone propose to enforce compliance in an arrangement that encompasses not only multiple parties (OpenAI, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, etc.), but also at least two levels (corporations and nation-states)?

Fine insured bounties do this pretty well. At least that's what past me thought.

https://andrew-quinn.me/ai-bounties/
So what you're saying that subjective notions of "feel" are important to the idea of product quality, but whether the product is actually well engineered is just "loosely correlated"? Wow. You are twisting yourself into a pretzel to emphasise that which favours your opinion and disregard that which runs counter to it.
A few years ago I "adopted" an abandoned GPL3 Windows app written using MFC (using the single-view multiple document options). I updated the dependencies, and migrated the project from VS6 to VS2022 and 64-bits.

Even if I wanted to update the UI components, Microsoft's documentation is such a mess from having multiple diverging UI paradigms, I can't figure it out.
> The US is a bipartisan, democratic system where members of Congress can draft a proposal for a new law and send it to both the Senate and House for voting.

> It's a rigorous process with lost of scrutiny and debate.

Do you also still believe in Santa Claus?
Need many images to superimpose them into a single computed image. David Kipping has a great video on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgOTZe07eHA&t=82s

We would need a train of probes being sent in a row because there is a limited amount of time they will pass through the focal area.
Low-Tech Solutions for Complex Demands: An Interview with Architect Henry Glogau
The $40k bounty for this type of vulnerability is the ultimate insult. Staying on Azure is on the border of being considered a firing offense...
Then either you're unaware or you're a sociopath.
Not only heroin or oxy, nor even opiates. It can come from cross-contamination, a seller might cut their heroin stash with fentanyl, let's say they use a scale to try to dose it, they don't clean the scale properly and then use it to weight some cocaine. Done, you have cocaine mixed with fentanyl.
Improve Onboarding in Teams Through the Magic of Storytelling
An overview of some tips that may help you enhance the onboarding process and increase its efficiency.
a 5cm lens from a dollar store can burn things in the focal point
I’d like a lever action too - I’d love a Faema Urania, similar but better styling to what I have.

I love the e61 group head though.
and reuses prompts between users/retrain with input data.

everyone always forget these when praising "open"ai closed products.

imagine google search showing other people's gmail content on web searches. That's what the current EULA for chatgpt allows to happen.
Depending on the model and the stairs, they can be annoyingly loud and actually 'erode' the edges of the steps.
Your proposal is interesting, though I think you may not have thought it through completely. I have some honest questions about it.

Under your proposal are millionaires okay? Or should society ban millionaires too?

If so why are they okay. If they are not okay, what should the wealth cap be?

Is it okay for anyone to have any private wealth? Your proposal sounds similar to socialism wherein everyone has a certain fixed income close to minimum wage and no one may accumulate wealth.

What are the differences between your suggestion and socialism as practiced historically?
I got a full-remote job in 2018 and think it's a big part of why we ended up having two kids (one was born 2017, one 2019) - we were on the fence before. It also allowed us to move somewhere more affordable.
While it's not manufactured by the same company anymore, a Korean company bought the formula and sells it on Amazon now! [0] So, you, too, can see what the hype is all about, if you want! At $0.39 per piece of chalk, it is, indeed, expensive. But, it is also a much different experience from writing with ordinary chalk.

---

[0]: https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B01HDNUXBW
When fentanyl properly "arrives" here (Ireland) its going to be a fucking bloodbath, and our government will wring their hands and go "there's nothing we could have done".

I mean, it (fentanyl) exists here, but is relatively rare for now.

We have large numbers of opiate users, most of whom are not the "homeless drug addicts" you would expect (though we have fucking loads of those).

We also have a massive number of people hooked on benzos and similar drugs, which here are almost all "legit contents, but dodgily branded generics from Asia".

Again, the vast majority of these addicts you wouldn't notice/know about.

From the data I've seen, in the US and Canada, both opiates and benzos are supplanted by fentanyl - fake benzos that are actually fentanyl, fent sold as oxys, sold as heroin, etc

The quality of heroin here tends to be pretty low, so whenever a stronger batch arrives there's often a number of deaths or near fatal overdoses.

Once fentanyl starts showing up in any significant amounts, there's probably going to be a fucking massive spike in overdoses.

The opiate problem here is only getting worse too, the governments been sitting on its hands and various plans to try deal with it besides just arresting people have languished in committees/planning for as long as I can remember.

Pretty much daily when out walking in a residential area I come across discarded syringes, the frequency of which increases the closer you get to the city center.

I regularly see users nodding off or shooting up in public, and that's just the visible ones. Seen a fair few OD's too, called ambo for a couple.

Narcan and similar aren't really accessible here - our health service has made a lot of noise about an access program, but the iron grip of the regulator won't simply make it OTC for private persons to purchase without paperwork.

Supervised injection rooms and such have also stalled out entirely due to nobody wanting one near them. Which is a bit daft.

If you walk around central Dublin, Temple Bar, etc, you will see dozens of people openly using "hard" drugs on the street. That is where the addicts are. So building a facility there makes sense, right? The local businessmen disagree, due to magical thinking that if its built somewhere else, the addicts will move. They won't.

I'm almost glad that the worst we have to contend with (for now) is the crack epidemic finally hitting our shores.
I don't... entirely mind this, this is how most APIs respond errors anyway in my experience, especially if they expect them to both be used for fully fledged browser clients that display errors and for API-only clients.

The only thing I don't like here is the "type" parameter and how its expected to be an URI. That will only hamper implementation, considering most API documentation isn't distributed as individual error pages. Most of the time you either have a PDF document (for private APIs), a single big HTML page (which to be fair, can be anchored) or in some cases, physical documentation.

Personally I'd just have allowed type to be a simple string that informs the machine about the type of exception that occurred, and expect people implementing the API to figure out what that means (ie. Through external documentation) instead of making it a URI.

The out of credit example would have a "type" of "OutOfCreditException" in my suggestion, of course adjustable by whatever is preferred.

This RFC is just a slightly pointless standardization that has one weird thing in it that nobody actually does, which to be fair "here's what were all doing but slightly different, so get to work" can describe a lot of RFCs.
We have electric scooter rental where I live in the UK (Bath). They are restricted to one operator (Voi), you need at least a provisional driver's licence, they automatically lock if you try and ride 2-up. and there are specified parking spots.

I use them a little bit (having an interest in SMart Cities), although in general I will tend to walk for shorter trips.

Overall, I think it is a success, albeit with some niggles.
- The parking can be a bit of a hassle, as many spots only take a limited number of scooters. I had a hospital appointment a few weeks ago, but when I arrived, there was no free parking at the hospital - so I had to park the scooter a few hundred metres away and walk.
- The original use-zone was quite limited, but it has expanded to cover much of the city. There are still range limitations, as Bath is very hilly!
- Best of all, the scooters have led to a change in driver behaviour, as they are now very much an expected part of city traffic. I see a lot more courtesy on the roads now.

I'm not sure how much car use has decreased as a result of the scooters, but I think it is slowly happening. It's mainly younger folk using the scooters, and I suspect that there is a slow change happening where they either don't get cars, or use them less.
Awesome! Any idea of planned browser support?
> Today LLMs have not been demonstrated to be capable of synthesizing novel code.

They are capable of doing that (to some extend). Personally, I've generated plenty of (working) code to solve novel problems and I'm 100% sure that code wasn't part of the training set.
And the reason for that is the drug users as criminals narrative has been promoted by a combination of well meaning misinformed people and mere neerdowell grifters.

The solution is to promote this alternative narrative, something which is happening now thanks in part to successful activism and better education, but also an increasing wariness on the part of the public on the true motives behind public drug policy. I don’t think it’s a pure coincidence that this is all happening at the tail end of the opioid pandemic!
I hope you're suggesting that in jest.

Realistically though, the better way to address the problem is to progressively tax capital, no matter the income. A top bracket of 5% of capital gone per year will pretty much solve all but the most efficient of billionaire problems. And progressively tax inheritance in a similar way too.
Are you seriously suggesting that the Chinese government is actively adjusting the weighting of the TikTok algorithms to sway mass opinion on the TikTok app? It’s already a stretch saying that the Chinese government controls ByteDance because they clearly don’t.
Blind people...
If you are happy, good for you.

For me, I have tried several X1 models, Carbon and non-Carbon, and I find the keyboards to be poor. Bezels on keys (is that the right term?) make no real difference to me.

Any Thinkpad with a chiclet keyboard is inferior to any Thinkpad with a non-chiclet keyboard. I often hear people say things like "oh the early ones were poor but they've got better" or "it was bad at first but they improved".

I don't think they've improved. I thought they were junk when they were new (e.g. X230) and they're still junk (e.g. 2022 models).

Again, I am not proclaiming this as some universal truth. It's my opinion, and only that.

But there are a list of things I like about my older Thinkpads: great best-in-industry keyboards, easily end-user upgradable disk and RAM, lots of disk bays, lots of ports, removable batteries, easy disassembly without special tools, easy to replace keyboards, pointing devicer, and so on.

Modern Thinkpads lack all these. Junk keyboards, sealed units, few ports, few bays, not upgradable, not end-user maintainable.

Thinkpads were Rolls-Royce laptops, user-serviceable, a joy to use, and with a long lifetime that was readily extended.

New ones are, to me, overpriced glued-together plastic junk, as poor as any other make...

But they're still black and still have a Trackpoint. So people who never tried the old ones think that being a Thinkpad means an average laptop but it's black and has a red dot thing that they don't know how to use, and they don't get why people rate Thinkpads so highly.
"woefully uneducated" I think that's the main trait the "A" side is known for globally... aside from arrogance of course.
Does that mean you could use light from Mercury to start a fire?
A river absolutely has a will In the broadest sense. It will carve its way through the countryside whether we like it or not.

A hammer has no will.
I still think that if you're concerned about this kind of thing, you should take a serious look at fine-insured bounties to redirect scientific resources elsewhere. (I'm no longer concerned myself for outside reasons, but if!)

https://andrew-quinn.me/ai-bounties/
Need to burn all the AI books
> There are lots of contradictions here. Voters don't understand how they can be asked to liberalize hard drug use (and even decriminalize dealing) on the one hand, and are asked for billions of dollars for drug addiction treatment on the other.

And understandably so. It's a textbook example of privatizing the profits, and socializing the costs.

It's not enough to tax drugs. Certain products are so harmful, and their harmful use so profitable, that allowing any kind of private profit from it at all is a disaster. (Yes, the most prominent of those are tobacco, alcohol and gambling).

Worse, addiction treatment is really expensive and not very effective - even the best addiction treatment programs have high relapse rates. Even the relatively cheap programs that only seek to limit the damage addicts do to themselves and others, can only be defended on humanitarian grounds, not economic ones.

Yes, we need to help addicts. Yes, including in purely harm-reduction ways. But we're deluding ourselves if we think this is a solution at all, let alone one we can afford if we let private economic interests profit from addiction without obstacles.
To me this just sound like they are sad that they lost access to user information because users switched from domestic platforms.
> Our freedoms are what make us different from them

Don't the US gov already have the power to arbitrarily sanction and restrict trade with foreign countries? e.g. You cannot sell to nor buy from people in North Korea. Banning all social media platforms from China seem like a vary minor extension of that power.
> I had to tell Windows that my internet connection was metered in order to get them to stop with the updates.

Nice tip. Any downsides to this?
This has been everyones biggest fear with AI - that the content will be indistinguishable from that created by humans and that there is a rapid decline in trustworthy material online.

Personally I find it more worrying that this is exactly the type of conversation that is already taking place today in real life, between humans.
Humans take advantage of each other every single day. When an AI is modelled on the language of humans then that same predatory language is in there waiting to be abused by another human (or corp) as you have exposed, just like every media and online platform is abused as much as possible today.
The e61 is pretty sweet.

I think my current dream machine is an Elektra MCAL. I am drawn to the idea of a machine with no machinery. Just a boiler and pressurestat and the spring lever to make coffee. The sweet sound of silence. Only the rush of water and the pouring of coffee to be heard.
I read a different book, written by the creators of AWK themselves. But the experience was much the same. You can read it in one sitting.

Or, rather, you can read the two first chapter easily in one sitting. Chapter one gives a brief overview and examples. Chapter two describes the whole language, every function and every variable! The rest of the book is just more examples. I really love this style!
A couple of related articles:

https://lucasfcosta.com/2021/09/20/monte-carlo-forecasts.htm...

https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2007/10/26/evidence-based-sch...

I've been trying to find out if there exists any out of the box solutions for getting cycle time for issues etc directly from the github api, and then do forecasting with confidence intervals - but so far I've drawn a blank.
I have a feeling it has something to do with the brain drain in journalism
Am from morocco so i made it that it fit the Islamic culture and our culture overall , so sometimes it might answer according to islam.
it's understand it like you really want to it cow. so probably it found checking islam culture first to know how to answer.

Thank you for taking your time,i will fix the answer problem.

Also it can generate pictures like "generate picture of princess" and absolutely it's protected for adult questions.
You're splitting hairs. We're all aware that bills receive multiple readings. The point is that this will be an utterly horrifying piece of legislature, and in any free society, should never even have gotten a first pass in this state.

> so don't be ridiculous saying stuff like this.

I'll stop saying ridiculous stuff when lawmakers stop putting those ridiculous things into their bills.
Hypersensitivity to the word "black".

Comments about "chalkboard" being more accurate should only be accepted if the proponent also uses "penboard".
If you read the judgement, the judge doesn't really see any distinction between "can technically record" and "must record", with only financial burdens being accepted as a justification for not doing so. The reasoning goes, because Chat could be recorded, it should have been because it's electronic communication.

But this logic can extend to any form of communication that could technically be recorded. It means that, by extension, all video calls and phone calls should be recorded too if you can afford to do so (but it's cheap, so you can). And that in turn means that the cost of remote work just exploded because many meetings that a non-remote company would have in an office, face to face, should now be recorded and preserved if any of the participants are under a litigation hold. But as the employees testified, at a big company like Google basically in a given discussion at least someone is always under litigation hold. So that means every meeting or phone call may have to be recorded. And that in turn means the discovery cost imposed on companies that allow remote work will be much higher.

Did companies just get a justification for forcing everyone back to the office? It does seem so. Maybe even for reducing the international presence of teams even when they're in the office.

The judge doesn't spell out this small extension of his argument. It seems he was mostly pissed off by Google employees obfuscating about the issue and lying to the court (no excuse for that). But having read it, where's the limit? The aspects of law they're citing talk about "electronically stored information". If not using a technical ability to record is interpreted as the same thing as destroying stored information, then the retention procedures at almost every company are going to be found in non-compliance simply because video calls, phone calls and so on are so often not being recorded.
It’s more of an excuse for the US lawmakers. There’s no need for new legislation to restrict trade with a foreign company.
> The Butlerian Jihad is officially no longer science fiction. Man may not be replaced.

I like this phrasing:

"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind."

It kinda cuts to the chase.
WhatHiFi is not the most egregious case, they put out a lot of fluff with higher-priced speakers but also give pretty decent reviews of more budget options.

I found out about Audio Pro through some WhatHiFi-esque publication, checked WhatHiFi's reviews and those were raving about Audio Pro's speakers even though they are pretty inexpensive relative to the whole audiophile environment.