skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Notice that they said

> yet most sites still attempt to load FB tracking scripts.

(Emphasis mine)

So yes, they do, and all that's irrelevant victim blaming because it's really unacceptable that this is something the user should have to bother with. It also requires an unusually high level of technical competence just to not get stalked, which is likewise unreasonable.
I’ve considered using a column to store indicate 2nd, 3rd, etc degree relations instead of n-th order tables.
It all depends on the vendor. The software that our company uses is totally locked down and it would be very difficult or impossible to run a ghost driver on it (I'm a local city driver, BTW, and Hours of Service rules apply to me also). Our software is tied to the time clock so when we physically punch in, the clock starts regardless on if we are logged in to the ELD tablet or not. It's still keeping track though.
> It could mean that they’ve already reached a threshold of comprehension earlier in the current speech

I feel like that is a distinction without a difference. If they already comprehend, then haven't they basically predicted the rest?

> or that they’ve latched on to a pertinent point and don’t care to hear the rest.

This I suppose is a little different, in that they are ignoring the rest, so yeah you're right there, it may not be predictive in that case.
I'm not asking for all of our Ministers to be technocrats. They needn't be SMEs. They needn't even be a major player in the industry prior to becoming a politician. But in all honesty, a Technology Minister not having a technical background is like an Education Minister being unable to read or write.

I'm not asking for some IEEE fellow with 100s of patent. I'm not even asking for a junior engineer with a couple of years in the industry. Hell, I daren't even ask for someone with a Math A-Level at this point. I'm asking for someone who can string a sentence about technology together, while also understanding a 10th of what they just regurgitated. It's embarrassing watching the leader that is meant to represent our industry go on stage and repeat a babble of buzzwords that they learnt about 4 hours before, in their latest think-tank meeting. That's not leadership. That's bull-shiting, and it stinks.
I said 'many' because 'everyone who uses reserved capacity instead of on-demand pricing' was too long for a headline.
Should “jobs” be required for participation in society?

Even Keynesian capitalists predicted we’d be working less by now with all the increases in productivity yet here we are with massive corporations continuing on union busting and all that.

I agree there isn’t going to be a BS white collar job to replace the ones lost by advances like this.
No there is reasoning in LLMs. This is actually proven through several scientific papers.

I can't say whether it's using reasoning for specific answers. I'm sure many times it just regurgitates something that is known... But saying that LLMs in general can and do reason is categorically true. LLMs do attempt to extract actual mental models of the subject of the text.

See here:

- GPT style language models try to build a model of the world: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13382

- GPT style language models end up internally implementing a mini "neural network training algorithm" (gradient descent fine-tuning for given examples): https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10559

For your specific case, given the conditions, another explanation that fits as well is that the LLM simply needs more data to build a more complete model for elixir. Once it does that I'm sure it can respond with completely novel elixir code as it already does with python.
surely you don't believe that all women are pro-choice… so how do pro-life women fit into your worldview? surely they don't lack agency in their decision-making process, thereby forfeiting their political power…?
The “weirdness budget” concept is nonsense. Are you saying that programming languages should do only some things right?
Narrative control is essential for social stability, privacy is just a smokescreen to disguise the valid concern that US federal government doesn't have the same degree of influence over TikTok that it does on US tech platforms.
https://www.google.com/search?q=india+etf

https://etfdb.com/etfs/country/india/

Now granted, as far as I know, no major brokerage supports dollar cost averaging into an ETF (needs to be a mutual fund that trades once at close so you never get to benefit from any intraday volatility)

which "moves the goalpost to" https://www.google.com/search?q=india+mutual+fund

in fidelity, i can set up automatic investing / dollar cost averaging (wealthfront's entire business model, right?) into any mutual fund they allow access to. curious the advantages from your product over this.
I made a html parser with some auto fixing. e.g. it can handle the extra quotation mark in below example:

<li class=" my-class"">

Sometime it can auto fix not properly closed elements as well.

Feel free to have a look at it: https://github.com/beenotung/html-parser
I've seen data showing ~70% recovery on a Model 3, but I also can't find the source :/
> AWS has never, to my knowledge, increased prices for an existing service.

Really? Seems semi-plausible but still surprising
A more reasonable conclusion is that there's incredible resistance to prosecuting former presidents. He's the first, and he's not the first president who has committed a crime.

Are (ex-)presidents above the law?
Kinda sounds like you need to give the company a personal loan that they are paying back instead of a wage.
When I was in college before Hubble was launched, my astronomy professor told me that the original design for the Hubble space telescope was for a smaller mirror, but got upgraded because the larger one would be cheaper to make the larger mirror, because larger mirror size was already being made. Also the Space Shuttle was sized for the larger mirror diameter. The strong inference is that the US DOD was already making that size, so existing tooling could be used. Consider Hubble pointed at a target only 200-3mmkm away...
Ask HN: How do you fix disorganized and unstructured thought/speech?
Had my first job interview in a while and I completely bombed it because I could not provide clear and structured answers. Blanking on words, tripping over myself, rambling along a million different vectors that are all tangentially related to the question being asked.
I'm not in favor of pausing AI development right now, but this article is a poor argument. This is the most superficial objection:

> Why six months? Why not six weeks or six years?

The duration of pause to assess things must necessarily be a guess. Also, basic logic tells you that six months does not preclude six years, so I don't know why that is even suggested as an alternative. The stuff about publishing papers may be true (or not, supported by it is by an anonymous anecdote), but entirely besides the point.

> On the other hand, I’m deeply confused by the people who signed the open letter, even though they continue to downplay or even ridicule GPT’s abilities, as well as the “sensationalist” predictions of an AI apocalypse.

To the extent those people exist, it's because they are scared.

IDK, I guess this is far from the dumbest thing I've seen written about chatgpt, but this response is weak and ill-considered.

I'm really expecting more from the people who are supposed to be the smart ones in the room.
This is not unique to the NYPD. Without dox'ing myself I have first-hand experience working with a police officer who drove a GT-R worth more than they made in a year on paper. Maybe he had family money, maybe he had saved a bunch of money from earlier in his career getting overtime on the street. But it certainly wasn't a good look regardless.
It is basic physic.

There is all the time friction of air and the road. You can never recover that.

And in rare cases where you actually can recover energy, at non emergency slowing down, it is probably indeed in that ballpark, wich is something(especially in city with stop and go), but not very high or much. With very high tech, you can increase that number a bit, but not worth the effort.
Electric cars need good batteries and every improvement there is good.
In a small community where everyone knows everyone you don't need equipment to run a surveillance state.

What about medium communities? Tech is very scalable, federal antiterror funds are significant, and surveillance is a profit center for police forces. Many medium police forces fund the majority of their budget through fines and fees.
As a former truck driver, I just can't see the government or insurance companies allowing self-driving 80,000lb trucks on a highway that also contains passenger-carrying automobiles. The liability is tremendous and it will take a decade or more of safe operation before those rules are relaxed. I'd anything, a trucker will end up leading a self-driving convoy of another unit on the interstate, but I'd imagine it's simply easier to add additional trailers like we've done in Ontario.

I envision truckers being legally responsible for their AI and it operating the vehicle similar to autopilot in an aircraft. Never autonomous, only a driving aid.
> This is literally idiomatic Python style! Classes are TitleCase and everything else is snake_case.

And Nim does distinguish between those.

> I've written names like "fooBar_prev"

That's disgusting.
Of all the conversations I’ve heard in the last 24 hours, this is one of the more unique takes - great point, thanks for raising it
The perception that crime has skyrocketed since the pandemic is propaganda, fueled by a police department afraid of being defunded, media outlets desperate for clicks, and a cop running for mayor.

Reality doesn't back it up. The murder rate in NYC is roughly where it was in 2009, and still five times less than it was in the 90s.

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2022-is-nyc-safe-crime-st...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_New_York_City#/media/...
AWS has never raised their prices
> I always heard about London being over-surveilled

In London it's not the government that's spying on you. The reason there are so many cameras is that it was established policy for insurance companies give discounts if you have comprehensive camera coverage, and then digital cameras got so cheap that it's simply a great deal for any business owner to acquire enough cameras to surveil the entirety of their business and all the surroundings. And since there's often no co-ordination, if you are walking in Central London you are always in the field of view of at least half a dozen cameras with different owners.

Of course, it did turn out to be very convenient to the police that if something happens, it almost certainly happened on video and they just have to go talk to all nearby business owners to get a copy of it.
We know there’s potential for far worse accidents. Build more nuclear plants to find out what the ratio really is. From 2 to 26 disasters you’ll hit some big ones. The NRC itself has said the same - https://www.science.org/content/article/spent-fuel-fire-us-s...
>> and of course ruthless rivals who want a breather to catchup

This was the bit i wondered about, there’s at least an incentive for this kind of jiggery pokery lobbying but little transparency.
Agreed. There is no way I would consider one without CarPlay. It has become too much a part of the driving experience.
Data collection and subscription charging…
For my company, compute is over 80% of the cost, so we would come out much worse on this even if storage dropped to zero.
"overreact to a relatively minor risk, mostly because the risk was novel.". yep, and here we go again with LLMs...
Bagging by Learning to Singulate Layers Using Interactive Perception
You don't need to be the NSA to figure out who's a corrupt cop. They wear badges and have uniforms.
You should rename foreign identifiers anyway. C names are usually very cryptic.
As a reminder, at Nim Conf back in October 2022 Andreas presented Nim 2.0 in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDi50K_Id_k&list=PLxLdEZg8DR...

Hearing again I cannot chuckle when Araq says: Nim v1 is good at everything, Nim v2 is supposed to be better at everything.

Back then it was supposed to come out in 2022 and indeed a RC1 came out in Dec. In the blogpost for RC1 you find the desciption of all new features: https://nim-lang.org/blog/2022/12/21/version-20-rc.html

This longer time is because extra care is being taken into having a smooth transitions (for example important libraries have been tested to work on nim v2, e.g. we made sure nimib was working with v2 in early Feb: https://github.com/pietroppeter/nimib/releases/tag/v0.3.6)
No I'm not.

I don't want targeted ads. I'm not interested in anything they have to offer. I will search for things I think I need by myself when I think I need then.
General Motors to Phase Out Apple CarPlay Starting This Year in EV Transition
Aggressive equivocation.
I think plenty of the center are happy to criticize both parties when they do stupid things (as is healthy and appropriate, IMO).

Fervent supporters of a particular side might notice a lot more when their party is criticized.
This is why police reform is so hard to achieve. When crime spikes, people are far less committed to police reform.

Even when crime isn't spiking, police can just sit on their hands whenever reforms are pushed and instantly change the narrative. This happened in SF with the AG recall and has happened in numerous municipalities. Local politicians can't afford to anger the police union because all the police has to do is stop enforcing the law aggressively and a local politician is done for.

So New Yorkers may want police reforms but the NYPD union has a lot of leverage to resist it. And voters generally dont' have the stomach to oppose police union backlash.
I was gonna say that no one was bleeding heart baiting as hard as you're alluding but the imagery of demanding affirmations of gratitude was too funny, to the point I no longer care.
Public Defenders are supposed to be a check on the DA, but we can all see how well that turns out funding-wise.

I can only assume the media was assumed to be a check on the police, as they're the only professionally investigative edifice that isn't government funded. Again though, there is a notable asymmetry there. Particularly nowadays.
Like OP mentioned, the efficiency of recovery varies by speed but is generally in the 65%-80% range for total round-trip (the system captures ~80% of the kinetic energy but with round-trip losses, you only get ~80% of that energy to propel the car).

Maybe you're thinking of the total range boost provided by regen braking? That's often shown to be roughly 20% via studies;

https://sci-hub.se/10.1109/vppc.2011.6043109

> Simulations show that the energy reduction of the vehicles under test can be more than 20% by applying regenerative braking.

It's an older study, but they show the regen efficiency at 60% for the EcoTruck and 70% for the bus.
Here's an example we can all try (and help me out). Validating that the input into a date field is a valid date using formik and yup. The problem is that stuff like "11" gets turned into a valid date:

Abbreviated prompt:

dateOfBirth: date().required().typeError('Invalid Date')

})

The dateOfBirth validation is incorrect because it accepts values like "11". What is the correct validation to ensure that a user has inputted a valid date?

GPTs first go:

****
dateOfBirth: date()
.required()
.typeError('Invalid Date')
.min(new Date(1900, 0, 1), 'Date must be after 1900')
.max(new Date(), 'Date cannot be in the future'),

In this example, the min method sets a minimum date of January 1, 1900, and the max method sets a maximum date of the current date. You can adjust the minimum and maximum dates as needed to fit your specific use case.
****

Me:

It still treats "11" as valid input

GPT second attempt:

*****
dateOfBirth: date()
.required()
.typeError('Invalid Date')
.test('valid-date', 'Invalid date', (value) => {
if (!value) {
return false;
}
const date = new Date(value);
return !isNaN(date.getTime());
}),
*****

Me:

The parameter 'value' passed into test is a date and not a string

GPT third attempt:

******

dateOfBirth: date()
.required()
.typeError('Invalid Date')
.test('valid-date', 'Invalid date', (value) => {
return value instanceof Date && value.isValid();
}),

******

Me:

There is no isValid function on Date objects

GPT fourth attempt:

********

dateOfBirth: date()
.required()
.typeError('Invalid Date')
.test('valid-date', 'Invalid date', (value) => {
return value instanceof Date && !isNaN(value.getTime());
}),

********

Me:

That still accepts 11 as a valid date.

GPT fifth attempt:

*********

dateOfBirth: string()
.required()
.test('valid-date', 'Invalid date', (value) => {
const dateRegex = /^(?:(?:31(\/|-|\.)(?:0?[13578]|1[02]))\1|(?:(?:29|30)(\/|-|\.)(?:0?[1,3-9]|1[0-2])\2))(?:(?:1[6-9]|[2-9]\d)?\d{2})$|^(?:29(\/|-|\.)0?2\3(?:(?:1[6-9]|[2-9]\d)?(?:0[48]|[2468][048]|[13579][26])|(?:(?:16|[2468][048]|[3579][26])00)))$|^(?:0?[1-9]|1\d|2[0-8])(\/|-|\.)(?:(?:0?[1-9])|(?:1[0-2]))\4(?:(?:1[6-9]|[2-9]\d)?\d{2})$/;
if (!dateRegex.test(value)) {
return false;
}
const date = new Date(value);
return date instanceof Date && !isNaN(date.getTime());
}),

********

Which may or may not be correct. That regex is bonkers and given the errors in the previous responses I don't trust it.
Again: I don't think you're accurate here. The Pasco County case kept heavy surveillance of children by trawling every school in the county and systemically categorizing every child in the county by GPA, Attendance, credit count, etc. to identify which children to put under heavy specific surveillance (e.g. showing up dozens of times at family members workplaces unprompted and with no suspicion of crime) effectively harassing entire whole families out of the county.

I would 100% consider screening every child to identify future criminals and then cracking down on their families, including unprompted visits to workplaces dozens of times, to be police state stuff.
Neither Facebook nor Google requires employees to have a LinkedIn account.
The ELD itself is a physical device that gets installed in the OBD-II port in the truck or vehicle. It records information about when the truck is operational. The hours that the truck is operational need to be accounted for, which is (usually) done by a driver using a mobile app.

If a truck driver gets pulled over, they need to prove to the officer that they are operating within their hours. In the past, this was done with a physical log book.
> Their accrual of power depends on being nice to the 30,000 people in the town

No it doesn't. Small town cops get their power from their lack of having anything to do and the blind support of the community.

The small town I grew up in had a cop murder four people because he broke chase policy and even left his jurisdiction. The town newspaper wrote a weeks worth of articles talking about what a great guy he was and how all the youths in the town loved him.

Don't piss off a small town cop. They have literally nothing to do and can/will pull you over every single time they see you.

Edit* I have to edit this due to this forums anti-discussion features

Sorry, most police departments have rules about how far/fast you can chase someone in a vehicle who is fleeing. They have these in place so cowboy cops don't engage in dangerous behavior for low value.

This cowboy pulled into a cul-de-sac and some kids who had some weed on them got spooked a pulled out. He started to chase them, it turned into a high-speed chase on rural roads. They flew through a stop sign and t-boned a car with four people inside of it. Killed them all. Over some weed.

That's why the policies exist in the first place, he violated it, and four people paid the price.
Why do you believe there will be no significant improvements beyond SOTA in the coming years / decades?

That's an incredibly strong stance...

I’d love to hear your assessment of the improvements from gpt-3.5 to gpt-4. Do you not think it is a large jump?
If you get inspected at a weigh station, they for sure are looking at that ELD records. Its probably the first thing they do. They don't automatically inspect you, only if you're overweight or if they see other problems such as vehicle safety issues, placards, etc. Once you are in the inspection process its a certainty that your hours will be looked at as well as every little safety and regulatory requirement.
Hard to tell, but here's my typical day... I work from home. Wake up at 8am, row for a bit on a machine, shower, make a coffee, and get to work around 8:45. At 9am we have a short daily standup call, which is a bit of a nuisance but okay. Some non-coding research or help the team till lunch. I'll take my wife and we'll walk somewhere far for lunch, around 11:45, sometimes sit down for a coffee, come back around 2pm. By this time I will already have some coding ideas crystallized in my head, so I'll code till 5pm. Go to gym, go have dinner. At this point we're usually at 12-14k steps. Come back around 8pm and work a bit more, maybe till 9:30. If I was good at splitting the task, by this time I'll usually have a PR ready. Then we go have some cocktails or just chill and watch TV. Bedtime at midnight.

So... altogether around 7-8 hours of work, of which at least 5 are coding. I enjoy that since I'm a generalist, sometimes I'll tinker with hardware, sometimes with firmware, sometimes DevOps, sometimes investigate some gnarly SQL, sometimes just write some APIs. So it rarely gets boring for me, even after more than 20 years coding professionally.

RE: AI, I tinkered with it a bit, and maybe something is wrong with my prompts, but it always gives me bullshit code that looks beautiful but is either absolutely wrong, or just fundamentally broken. I do have ChatGPT plus, Copilot and whatnot, and so far neither of them has been any help.
I don't see any 95+ CRI 100 Watt replacement bulbs on their site?
>Code is better than YAML.

This is too broad a backlash against it. Where YAML is used in problem domains where the configuration complexity is strictly limited and "etched in stone" it works very well. Nobody tends to champion YAML in this use case because it becomes somewhat invisible. It Just Works and nobody complains, but nobody raves either.

In domains where you have to start templating YAML, it fails horribly of course. This is YAML being used in a domain where it either shouldn't ever have been used or where APIs of some kind should have been provided alongside to accommodate dynamic use cases.

What "works" as configuration is often very hard to know up front, but the above attitude is throwing the baby out with the bathwater rather than seeking the correct balance.

Turing complete code is inherently more difficult to parse, understand and modify clearly than a config file and much more susceptible to technical debt.

>Your Integration Tests are Too Long

This is also a wrong attitude, I think. Faster feedback loops are great, but an obsession with speed typically leads to a lot of very quick tests that test very unrealistically - often missing entire classes of bug.

I've worked on a bunch of projects which had test suites that completed in under 10 seconds and never caught any bugs. Meanwhile, the team would end up leaning on manual QA to replace "slower" integration tests and the feedback loop on that made 5 hour CI runs look entirely worthwhile.
You're right in your thoughts. It's the perfect form factor for those single player narrative games, especially if you don't own a tv w/ a steamlink or the like. I usually have trouble finishing games, because i'm often distracted. I found when I can't alt tab to the internet, i focus a lot longer on narrative games. The steam deck has been wonderful for me.
> They should have just made a language wide convention like Rust.

I don't know about Rust, but Python has a language-wide convention – and programs still violate it, including the standard library.
Indeed it does, and we haven't got that under control yet, not by a very long distance. So I figure better take it easy before adding an even more powerful tool to the mix.