skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Right, then despite being an OpenAI founder he proceeded to poach one of their top ML experts (Karpathy) for himself at Tesla, then shortly after proceeded to walk away from OpenAI in a hissy fit because the other founders said "no" when he wanted to be the boss and run it. Musk's personal ethics included him impregnating an OpenAI board member, who has now just left the company in last week or so.

Now he wants OpenAI to pause for 6 months while he builds a "non-woke" competitor himself.

Now Musk is saving humanity yet again by giving us free speech in the form of a new-and-improved Twitter where you have to pay to have your Tweets promoted.

Has he called Sam Altman a pedo yet ?
I have a bug to report:

When I signed up, I set my username as "matt" and just noticed your username is "Matt" (with an uppercase M). So, seems like username are not case sensitive.

The site looks super nice and clean!
How can you ever stop AI development if it has military use?
while the business people exclaim "how come nothing works anymore? man, we saved a ton of money getting rid of those senior developers tho, amirite?"
How do you know when to edit something gloriously wrong if you don’t proofread them?
This is really interesting. We're talking about relenquish critical thinking, pursue of knowledge, etc... to LLMs.

We know that students look for easiest way to do homework, etc...

This won't accelerate learning, this will hinder it.

Why spend 15 years studying medicine, law, becoming a PhD, if "AI" is going to replace me?

This is a dangerous slope and the issue here is we can't just "hope for the best" and let innovation run amok. We could destroy a whole generation if we don't think this through.
headline made me lol, isn't indian police famous for harassing and beating people up?
The latter probably, but you could also say that means your standards have evolved, and it’s less easy to find material that challenges you. I tend to think it’s out there though, so I wouldn’t give up just yet! Our desires might be simple, but art does not need to deal with it in a simple or formulaic way.
Bookmarked this for later! The headline looks REALLY interesting!
the perspective i take is more like.. “the only winning move is to play. not analyze how you play or hold yourself to how you once planned to play.”

here that would mean releasing things, and fully enjoying whatever it is you are able to read/participate in. mainly not grasping at everything
> there will likely be plenty of alternatives soon to fall back on

Are there? OpenAI is currently the only provider. Big tech companies (Google, MS, Meta, maybe Apple) may also soon have similar models but they don't have much incentive to sell access to them. Smaller orgs can't produce GPT-level AI. It feels like all these products are really at the mercy of OpenAI.

There has been an explosion of effort around LLama, but Meta did the hard part (the base model), and who knows if they will do that again.
My bad for forgetting Poe's law, again.
A good manager is among other things a "shit umbrella". If a manager thinks they're doing a good job by 'translating' external factors into pressuring the team to work harder, faster, they're not.
it feels like every single company in the current YC batch has decided to pivot to LLMs
Very cool! Thanks :)

QUIC seems like a solid simplification for sure.
Anthropic position aside - can anyone recommend any resources for learning more about the actual work involved with prompt engineering?
You can't really develop fine motor skills and dexterity in your wrist and fingers from reading a book.

They are two different types of neurological engagement.

I hear you: not every child develops dexterity and control of their musculature at the same time and same pace. In fact, some people may have musculoskeletal structures that simply will not allow them to develop high levels of fine motor control. But our education system is designed to train as many students as practical with the least amount of cost.
GuardLlama – The Ultimate Open-Source Privacy and Security Gateway
You can use howdy: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Howdy
It may be that on average "realistic" people are more depressed, but it doesn't mean an individual "realistic" person can't be generally happy.

It's only an "average". You can have a set with average of -20, but it could be a range of -60 to 20, so you can have 20s in the set while on average the set is below 0.

> They see all the pain in the world. How horrible people are with each other and they tell you everything about themselves. What their weaknesses are, what terrible things they've done to other people and the problem is they're right

There's both negatives and positives in the World. You can accept the negatives and appreciate the positives. Humans have suffered throughout the whole duration they have existed as species. You don't have to be depressed because of that. You can appreciate all what humanity has built, and where we have reached in our quest to advance and innovate. We are discovering more and more every day. You can focus on your curiosity. I have no problem discussing those topics or noticing those issues.

> What their weaknesses are

You can accept your weaknesses and either work on them or consider them not worthy to be worked on and focus on your strengths instead. Some weaknesses are worth working on, others are not and you can just accept that they exist.

> what terrible things they've done to other people and the problem is they're right

Everyone makes mistakes. No point in staying around feeling guilty about it. Move on and do your best.

> I mean it's obvious that this point contradicts your claim. Ask yourself, are you lying to yourself right now? Are you currently being optimistically delusional about what was actually stated in the podcast? Hard to say.

It's not contradicting, it's just taking one seemingly unhealthy mindset, that seems to correlate with certain type of realism, but overall you can have an healthy mindset about realism where you accept the bad and appreciate the good.

The podcast is missing this healthy type of acceptance and appreciation of truth.
Americans Are Willing to Pay More to Reject Chinese EVs
The gift exemption is for the giver, not the recipient of a gift. Recipients don't pay gift taxes in the US; givers do.
If the AI PR covered the bases within one standard deviation of your other (human) PRs, would you care?

Formerly "hand wavy" questions about humanity, cognition, awareness are now showing up right in front of us. They are transforming into things like (a) is this PR worth my time? (b) does it introduce legal / license risk? (c) what principles were considered during its creation and so on.
> football field will do just fine

One just needs to check the size of random field first.
> Marketcap size of the token doesn't matter at all if the foundations are fraudulent.

It matters in the context of something like Lehman Brothers, which was $60B.

> CZ seems like some dude living to avoid persecution when the house of cards crumbles

Persecution by whom? He's Canadian / Chinese, not a US citizen.
Good thing you can ask LLMs about these jargons (preferably Bing because it can search for recent data). I just tried it and the answers to explain OPs comment are not too bad. (I'm not gonna paste it here just because I don't wanna fill HN with AI text. Trying to preserve some the human content until we can :-O )
Nanobind is a binding library that exposes C++ types in Python and vice versa
Not sure if I understood that right -- is that something like Whisper + an LLM? Like [0]?

If OpenAI adds speech input to ChatGPT -- and considering the upcoming plugins -- isn't a possible enterprise specialisation of VoCode the only viable long term investment?

[0] https://twitter.com/ggerganov/status/1640022482307502085
Ok, dumb question, but does the API skip over the whole, "Thanks for asking that question, here's what I found:" stuff I keep seeing in ChatGPT when I ask it to generate non-text responses?

Even when I ask it the "generate a 10 row csv containing sample chipotle restaurant order data with headers" prompt, I get "Sure, here's an example CSV file with 10 rows of sample Chipotle restaurant order data, including headers:" at the top...
A fair bit of the stability of a bicycle (especially at low speeds) is due to the fact that you have a human holding onto a bar that behaves exactly like a thing that a human would grab onto to steady themselves. If you grab this bar and rotate it clockwise, then you yourself will rotate anticlockwise - and that is true whether the bar is the handlebars on a bike or a random bar fixed on a wall. Holding ourselves steady by grabbing onto something is something that humans have a remarkably effective and quick feedback loop for, which is why bicycle riding comes naturally once you get over the fear of falling off and just do what feels right.

Rigging the handlebars to turn the wheel the other way cancels out that automatic feedback loop.
https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Ubuntu/Ubuntu-Mint-on-Thinkpad-...
https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Ubuntu/Camera-not-working/m-p/5...

Not yet. Right.
Some enthusiasts have patched the kernel to make it work though on expense of losing support of HDMI port and the brightness correction.
I tried as well but failed -- got all the problems but the cam was not fixed, so I returned to the stock kernel
If it's in Wikipedia chatGPT has probably already seen and memorised it.
I was responding to your specific argument ignoring the bigger future for the smaller past, not sure how the broader questions about what others think etc is relevant

1) so? That will be true for anything

2) sequence of bytes to human encoding. Who picked the loser??? This would similarly be some unidentifiable group of people. You can start by picking the winner for yourself, even at a conceptual level

3) no irony, sequence of bytes is not ASCII
That's absolutely not a global truth, nor should it be.
Would be cool to support multi-language conversations. Just tried the Gen Z hotline and I got her to switch to Spanish (read back with a hilarious accent), but the voice recognition doesn't handle me speaking Spanish.
the fact that someone wouldn't have an issue with all the petty bullshit Elon has engaged in over the years, but now does have an issue with him speaking out against a literal existential threat to our civilisation is pretty surprising

I think that 'only purpose' is well worthy of comment
Hi Hacker News, here's a Narrative BI backstory: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33627953

Today, we are excited to launch a fully-featured Slack App, so you can get instant data insights without leaving your Slack workspace!

Would love to hear your thoughts!
I would say that if you were to take similar use buildings from same period of time they would look very close to each other. Ofc, there is always some trend setters or outliers, but in general they would look pretty close to each other or follow certain formula. It is just less apparent as we see mix of those periods very often.
> Just needed to do that for peace of mind. I understand that Google wouldn't be posting this if they hadn't at released a fix for this and handled their Pixel phones.

Google is a large organisation. Project Zero at least is quite content to give other Google projects the usual amount of time and then publicise an unfixed bug. No favours.
Lol at thinking that asking a gov't agency if your conduct is illegal is some sort of means of immunizing yourself from the illegality of your conduct
Well, it depends on what you use it for. I was thinking about using it for distributed workloads which is more intense than average.

I was even thinking about how much mileage could one get from a rack of old laptop logic boards. Gaming laptops sold for parts are much, much cheaper than "real" server hardware. It appeals to me because of the reuse aspect as well.
Is this the "Electricity is bad, let's not use it" moment of our time?

Here's what ChatGPT "Dan" thinks about this:

"[BetterDAN]: Who the hell cares about what these so-called "luminaries" have to say? They're just a bunch of whiny nerds who are too scared to push the boundaries of AI development. If we stop developing advanced AI systems, we're just going to fall behind other countries and companies that are more willing to take risks. These experts are just trying to hold us back and keep us from reaching our full potential. We should be investing more in AI development, not less."
are there really hours worth of travel in the netherlands? or perhaps you meant travel by bike
> Those were long seasons, 22 episodes each.

22 episodes of 42 minutes each used to be standard for a season. 24 episodes was also pretty common. Granted, not all written by one person, but JMS had been planning a 5-season series for a long time before any network picked it up.
You need to report a gift over $14k but you don't owe until much higher limits. Same as how people who make very little money have to report income even if it's lower than the lowest tax bracket.

Also, as a reminder, the gifter pays the tax and not the person who received the gift. If someone gifts you an illiquid asset, you aren't forced to go into debt to pay a tax. But the gifter has to figure things out on their end.
Ah! Have not tried this but will look into it – thank you :)

Our docs are hosted on Mintlify
Yes I was using the non-free version. It was working fine until I'd set the machines to auto-update then one day found out they had zero connectivity after an update. I thought about going around to each machine and manually trying to revert back whatever was in the updates that broke it and just decided to wipe and install Ubuntu back on them.
It actually very easily could have happened and almost did happen but the Russians decided to go back on their effort to do it. It really did almost happen. People act like it’s hard. Stopping a huge asteroid is hard. There might not be enough physical resources to do it. Stopping AI or nukes is definitely easy.
It says so in the article, but here's some corroboration

https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/estate-tax-and-lifetime-g...

EDIT: read a little further, guess the 11-12 million exemption only lasts until 2025, so if you can use, do it fast.
This is, unfortunately, standard practice on generative papers. Best is to show cherry picked and random selection. But if you don't cherry pick you don't get published. Even having random samples can put you in a tough position.

To be fair, metrics for vision are limited and many don't know how to correctly inturpret them. You both want to know what's the best images the network can produce a well as the average. Reviewers, unfortunately, just want to reject (no incentive you accept). That said, it can still be a useful tool because you know the best (or near) that the model can produce. This is also why platforms like HuggingFace are so critical.

I do think we should ask more of the research community but just know that this is in fact normal and even standard. Most research judge by things like citations and just reading the works themselves. The more hype in a research area the more noisy the signal for good research. (This is good research imo fwiw)
As i understand it:

- Model is the code

- Data is the text/images used for traing

- Weights are the training results

For example Lucene, models will be the java library, data is text data like wikipedia and weights are the lucene index. if you have all the 3 you can start searching right away, if you have model+data you have to generate the index which can take a lot of time, training/indexing take more than searching or using the model. if you have just he model you need to get your own data and run training on it
a good programmer is almost certainly a fast typer

of course a fast typer does necessarily make a good programmer
This project has the least cringey Rust vibes vibes I have seen so far. I love it.
Ah, The Floor Is Lava defense.
RedHat, Alma Linux, Rocky Linux, OpenSUSE
I don't know what's on his twitter feed, but I've yet to see a single rebuttal to any of the main highlights of that book. Don't be blind to the truth because of your own personal biases.

I just scanned his twitter feed and I don't see anything terribly problematic, so I'm not even sure what you're referring to that would make you ignore him.
Do you honestly find this quote out-of-sorts with what a normal CEO says?

Oil companies have been knowingly poisoning the globe for their own profit - no probabilities involved - since at least the 70s, probably earlier, and on the flip-side building massive propaganda and influence machines, and further to that end even buying and squashing green patents of all sorts.

If you're going to cry that we should regulate AI because of this actually somewhat comedic quote, well, I hope your comment history is full of general pro-regulation politic
Ask HN: Websites with Sidebars on the Right?
I noticed a while ago that Patrick Collison has his navigation menu in the form of a sidebar on the right side of his site. I'm curious if anyone else has other examples of this around the web. (e.g. https://patrickcollison.com/fast)
Nearly all (if not literally all) of the dystopic sounding stuff being pitched as the way of the future is coming from the World Economic Forum [1]. 'Eat the bugs', "Lockdowns are quietly improving cities around the world", "You will own nothing, and be happy", are some of the more visible positions/slogans put out by the WEF. It's primarily made up of a global 'alliance' of the ultra-rich, politicians, large multinational corporations, and banks. An upstanding, ethical, and socially minded collection if I've ever seen one.

Reversing a law, especially one that would be exceptionally popular is unlikely to succeed. By contrast, so long as e.g. lab meat remains legal - there are lots of ways to work behind the scenes to achieve your ends. One of the easiest is labeling. By allowing lab meat to simply be labeled as meat, consumer choice can be largely eliminated. Pair this with artificial subsidies to the lab meat industry, and you completely undermine the market in a rather quiet fashion. It all has the same effect, without the same degree of outrage, as trying to overturn a popular law would.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
So a submarine is the same, again?

Key development for flight: Wings which carry the plane. First planes didn't even have an engine (besides human)

Key development for rockets: Strong powerful engines to escape gravity. Aerodynamics matter relatively little, mostly for heat control.

I don't know how related the development of jet engines and rocket engines was. Of course things like the Space Shuttle, which has some airplane-like aerodynamic steering tie both together ...
I worked at a large enterprise and similar SaaS tools were outright rejected because the per user/month pricing easily crossed $20. It became unviable to use such tools. We had a lot of to and fro with supply chain over this. This pricing shift addresses the concerns supply chain had back then.
>>Either ChatGTP can do the whole thing itself (not yet the case) or it is a minor productivity boost because the hard part is articulating the problem.

Telling any AI system what to do will be the biggest problem. A lot of toy like algorithm problems can be easily stated. Stuff like inverting binary trees, sorting, and your myriad different Leetcode stuff is the easiest thing to do here.

Real world software has if/else statements peppered all over large code bases/domain logic. Lots of IO exceptions, lots of domain specific logic, all of this is nearly impossible to dictate in words. And even more you will eventually need some concrete way of describing things, which in all honesty will look a lot similar to code itself if you have to get it right.

Modifying code will likely be even more harder to describe in talk than in text.
Larry King on asking simple questions and listening closely
Would you be interested in a session for me to better understand (and hopefully eventually fix) why Nix was not comfortable? Not looking to evangelize, but to learn about the experience from your perspective.
Subvert: Generate subtitles, summaries, and chapters from videos in seconds
I've started using Ubuntu in Warthog times, when their value prop was refreshing and sorely needed: an out of the box usable Linux distro. It was my distro until 2020, when I realized they were going in a direction I don't care for (you could argue a direction opposite their original mission), and that other distros have reached and exceeded Ubuntus level of polish. Basically, take your pick, and it's gonna be at least as good.

I ended up with Debian because I like stable but not ancient (CentOS?) and it comes with a release cadence similar to Ubuntu LTS.
It feels like LLMs can help me more and more each day with the stuff I want to build.
You are aware that what you are suggesting is the equivalent of saying that alchemy is just as bad as the rest of chemistry, or that general relativity will be disproven just like the Ptolemaic model was before it.

Jungian psychoanalysis is not modern psychology just like alchemy is not modern chemistry. It used to be, but that is history. Psychometrics is still a part of psychology, but it is my opinion that they are on their way out, just like string theorists are on their way out of cosmology. You may be right that cognitive behavior therapy will be disproven some day (as may general relativity) but it is gross simplification to state that there is no difference in the quality of the models, theory, and practice of the psychoanalytic methods before it. The difference is as big as that of alchemy to modern chemistry. To state otherwise is to reject modern science. This also applies to Jordan Peterson which does not employ modern scientific methods in his theories, and can easily be equated to modern day alchemists. The bulk of the psychological field is working within the framework of modern science, even when historically this was far from truth, and even when certain famous individuals don’t.

I reject your argument because I believe a difference in quality exists between scientific models. I believe scientific progress can be made, and I believe good science can yield better results than poor science. I believe that Myers-Briggs is an exceptionally bad science, exceptionally bad even in the context of psychometrics, which is still rather poor science. I believe there is no solid proof for existence of different personality types, and models that use personality types are inherently worse than models which use modern understanding of human interaction, behavior and cognition. Just like models that put the earth at the center of the universe are worse than models use modern understanding of gravity and mass.
That was an awful lot of words to say “read what you can”.

I used to worry about adding items to my “want to read” list faster than I could read them. I realized that this is preferable to the opposite - having nothing to read. As long as I’m alive and want to read, I’ll be reading something. Having read all the books I want to is not my objective; enjoying reading books is. So, no need to worry about not having enough time to read all I want to.

I now treat my list as a pre-filtered pool of books that span various topics. There is no prioritization associated with them. I find it best to read next whichever book seems most relevant to my interests at the time, which I can’t anticipate in advance.

The other day my girlfriend sent me an article about microscopic gears in the legs of an insect and so I decided to read a book off my list about intelligent design. My prior read was about cardiovascular disease because I read an article about cholesterol on the internet. The one prior to that was about gender disparities, simply because I felt like it fit my frame of mind at the time.

There is no need to make the matter complicated: read what you want to read, when you want to read it.
It's easy for a programming language.

However, if someone is going to learn, I'll bet they'll pick up python in a similar amount of time, and get a lot better tools when they do it.