skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think the problem is most people don't want to think to hard about stuff. so if you have to go to multiple resources when they can go to one and get almost as good of an answer.
I'm working on an candidate-centric, open source recruiting platform, called SRC ("source"). It promotes transparency and collaboration between candidates and companies by giving candidates the same access to automation and GPT-powered tooling that companies have.

For candidates, SRC is a recruiting email assistant that automatically manages their inbound job opportunities and builds them a personalize job board, so they can hit the ground running whenever they are ready for something new. In the future, SRC will act as a personal recruiter proactively reaching out to companies that meet your criteria and seeing if they are interested.

The goal is to rebuild the modern recruiting stack from the candidate's perspective, emphasizing transparency and collaboration at each step of the recruiting process.

Check it out and let me know what you think! https://github.com/shared-recruiting-co/shared-recruiting-co

New contributors are welcome :)
Next step would be to de-correlate smartphone usage, the prime suspect right now, from other trends happening at the same time. I have two daughters in that age range and I don't get the impression that social media is a big stressor for them in particular but I can easily believe that it is one of the primary stress factors for many young women.
what's a pull request?
Is it about using TikTok, or about doing business with them (e.g. buying advertising or hosting servers)?

FWIW, I've been against this bill from the beginning, for this exact reason that it appears like Patriot Act 2.0. Just replace "TikTok" with "Twitter" or "BitCoin hard wallet" and you see the problem with the precedent of congress declaring specific software a national security threat.
Thanks! It's a collab with rime.ai TTS. Unlike a lot of other TTS providers, they train on conversation, not podcasts/audiobooks so you get those disfluencies in speech that make it seem natural!
WWDC Announced on June 5, 2023
I was listening to an archaeology professor not long ago. He was challenging the long-standing hypothesis that human migration came across the Bering straight and then moved inland early on, populating the inner North American continent.

He postulated that the migration initially moved down along the West Coast quite a ways before moving inland. He suggested that we initially thought inland because that's where we find so many artifacts. But we forget that the coastline of the time period may have been as much as 400ft lower than today, thus so much of the archaeological artifacts are either lost or unknown to us today. Because we only have access to what was not submerged below sea level rise, we have an incomplete (and, apparently misguided) impression of what really happened.

Some of the oldest human remains (possibly the oldest) in North America are actually on Santa Rosa Island, one of the Channel Islands off Santa Barbara, California. [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arlington_Springs_Man
Do high earners consume progressively more proportion of their income in public resources than the poor? Why would you jack up their tax rate? Also note you picked the literally only one of 11 states in [0] above California that is (R).
By unilaterally deciding the “right” timeline and purging living beings who don’t fit in lol

Also let’s not forget kidnapping, gaslighting, and erasing people’s memories!
> We want writing to be transparent, clear, and easy to read.

Need I say more than the above quote to convince someone that the “figurative use of literally” should be avoided? I’d say the same of any other auto-antonym.

Language is a tool to communicate our meaning. When we use words that obscure our meaning, it ceases to serve its purpose.

Yes, I understand it is hyperbolic. Yes, I understand it has been used in this way for a long time. The reason that the author of this video has words like “very”, “ridiculous”, and “fabulous” to complain about is because nobody was a stickler about those words long ago, and they’ve now lost their meaning. Yet somehow, rather than encouraging people to use words to mean what they mean, he decides that since it’s happened before, we ought to accept it happening again. I don’t know why he would ever decide that is the rational decision.
There was a moment in 2017 when I was sure the GM Volt would usher in an age of series hybrids with larger and larger batteries. Then Tesla released the M3 and GM released the Bolt and the Volt was subsequently discontinued.

There must be some solid reason as to why mid-capacity batteries in a hybrid don't make economic sense for car companies.
I understand people feel differently, and layoffs can certainly be extremely disruptive to those affected, but I don't consider them a mark of "failure" of management.

What's better, to get hired, paid a great salary and gain experience and knowledge for a couple years, and then get laid off with 4 months severance+benefits, or never get hired at all? To be clear, I think there are some fair arguments (not necessarily ones I agree with) for "never get hired at all", but just be clear, that is what you are arguing for.
This is basically what civil forfeiture is designed for (although it's being severely abused). The cops arrest you and seize all assets that are suspected of being used in or obtained by the suspected crime.

This has been heavily abused in California and elsewhere [1][2] to seize assets from marijuana dispensaries or "suspected drug criminals". Cops seize product and money, never file charges, and then let the business owners fight for months/years to get their property back (often times with the seized product having long since expired), despite no charges having been filed.

IMO it's an egregious violation of the 4th amendment and it's maddening that more isn't being done to stop the practice.

[1] https://reason.com/2022/02/04/a-california-sheriff-remains-f...
[2] https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/08/12/taken
This is more informative than some other articles recently submitted.

This shows that the bills are much more about punitive measures for people using Chinese services in general than it is about broader privacy or national security. It isn't just TikTok being targeted, it is all Chinese tech. That goes pretty far.

Side note: this fell off the front pages quickly. Not sure if it got booted to the shadow realm.
> I also try not to play more than a handful of games at a time. The paradox of choice is real.

In general I'm like this, but I also have games that are exclusions to the rule that I pop back around to from time to time, like the save I have in Factorio that I come back to and tinker with now and then (I keep a text file around with my general to-do list so I don't spend an hour running around the base trying to remember what the hell I was doing, while marveling at various bits of kludged together spaghetti)

As for books, I'm generally working through at least 3 at a time: One on audible, for commutes, one on my kindle, and one in print. I try to keep the kindle/print books varied so I switch between whichever strikes my fancy at the moment.
I can't dictate policy to foreign nations but I can lament my own countries inane policies on these issues.

Regarding the coof: No need to go all Papers Please and ban people from working, fine and arrest people traveling more than 1km from home, or repress morally justified protest over those actions. It was the most horrendous expansion of government power I've seen, probably since the patriot act.

Regarding russia: No need to harm energy markets more than war normally does with embargoes and destruction of infrastructure. No need to deplete local stockpiles by giving them away to foreign civilians rather than your own. No need steal people's money to give away.
right, I doubt this guy is worried about COBRA coverage
Disney did just fire their CEO though.

Although he got a $20m exit package which undoubtedly softened the blow.
Art nouveau buildings from the early 20th century are almost universally considered nicer than today's buildings, and yet they're no longer made.

Not because we think modern buildings are nicer, but purely for a matter of cost.

I suspect the same is the case (even if to a lesser extent) in electric toothbrushes and other items of our daily life.
Yeah. I was too lazy to look it up...
You're forgetting the most important distinction: this time, they're the side that's attempting to encircle and subjugate another country.

A country a third of its size (in population), that -- very much like the Soviet Union itself in WW2 -- is resolutely determined not to be subjugated.
On the contrary!

There is a key difference going from "convergence" to "conformity": circular reasoning.

People who need to sell the thing they invent, tell themselves that "convergence" is the best way there. Customers like familiar traits. So they design for intentional convergence, and that is the essence of conformity.

99.99999% of keyboards are the same physical layout. This layout is a standard that conforms to the general shape of an 1800s typewriter. There is no functional need to continue this. There was no natural convergence toward this shape: it's so bad it often injures the user! The only driver is the value of familiarity to the act of selling a keyboard.

With the advent of cheap 3D printers, we have seen a surge in hobby keyboard design. These people care so much about getting a better keyboard shape that they are willing to spend hundreds or thousands of dollars to get there. What they want they cannot buy; this was especially the case 5-10 years ago. The very existence of this group proves that traditional keyboards are the result of conformity, not convergence.
"The crazy" being prevented in that sentence is the life of nearly every sentient being.
Can we classify Windows as adware now?
"Obviously everyone else should slow down. We're fine."
Lots of people before have claimed there is a "perfect" or "final" aesthetic that is discoverable through science. They've all been surprised 20 or 30 years later when people started liking different things.
Ehn, yes. If I see the pope in a strip club, I'll be damn shocked, but not if I see a random catholic. The difference is that the latter is a random member and the former is the literal face of his church, so he has to abide to certain tenets or at least pretend to.
OK, I undestand what you read, but would like some more clarity.

Why is the Fed trying to move the banking sectors to consolidate banking for the last 50 years?

The President of the United States nominates the members of the board of directors. The US Senate confirms those choices.

No two governors may come from the same Fed District. They are 14 year terms and staggered. No board member can be re-appointed.

You would have to have the entire US presidents from Nixon to Biden in on it. All 100 Senators (or the majority) would have to be in on it. Every Fed governor would have to be in on it. All the people around those decisions - POTUS staff, Senators' staff, everyone working at the Fed - all working in unison and no one talking for 50 years - no books written that they want to put all small banks out of the way. It's easy to say "The Fed" but the current members are Jerome Powell, Michael Barr, Michelle Bowman, Lisa Cook, Philip Jefferson, and Christopher Waller. What can you tell me about each of them? Why would they be in lockstep? Have they all been told that they would be assassinated by the CIA if they didn't follow orders from some shadowy group? Who exactly is this shadowy group that will assassinate them. Please name names instead of saying "shadowy group." I only use this term because I don't know what their names are and if they have an actual group name.

And most importantly, who and why would someone want to have us be the next Argentina? Why does - not the fed - but Jerome Powell, Michael Barr, Michelle Bowman, Lisa Cook, Philip Jefferson, and Christopher Waller want to destroy the USA? Why does every single president and every single Senator every single Fed Member, and all of their staffs, for the last 50 years, want to destroy the USA? I'd love to know this. If you could list every single member of Senate and all the Fed Board members, by name (Senators and Fed board members and their staffs), and tell me why each and every single one of them want the destruction the USA, I'd love to hear it. I also assume since the USA is destroyed, it would also take out Western Europe and most countries around the world - like, almost all of them.
One other thing that VB did well was integrate with Windows COM components. I was working on a scientific application at the time. Just for fun, I spent a half an hour to add a button on the data grids that would start Excel and push the data over. The scientists were more excited about the Excel integration than the actual statistical analysis features I was working on.
And sites for Shopify Apps were created from Shopify app shop page in 60sec:
https://close-delete-cancel-orders.60sec.site/
https://ai-bulk-description-wizard.60sec.site/

/ I'm co-founder
The file limitations kill my productivity. For permission reasons Firefox won't open local html file on my machine. My work VPN loads a loval file to log in.
Looks like the window is rapidly shrinking for Lucky to ”Occupy Mar“
https://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Documentation

https://www.blaisepascalmagazine.eu/product-tag/lazarus-book...
The issue (in my view) is that the dose of efficacy to the dose of issue (when it starts causing problems) is MUCH closer for acetaminophen.

Acetaminophen 'usage' dose is usually 500-1000mg (1-2 pills). The dosage where it becomes significantly toxic is ~7500-10000mg (7.5-10g), which is somewhere in the range of 10x the dose.

Ibuprofen on the other hand, 'usage' dose is 200-400mg (1-2 pills, again). Toxic dosage is closer to ~16000-25000mg (16-25g), which is more like 50x the usable dose.

Since people invariably take more than the recommended dose when they're really in pain, I'd prefer the NSAID that is less toxic at higher doses... since it's not like they post toxic doses on the side of bottles.
I don't know what kinda code-bases you work on, but I think there are many more potential factors which determine how useful GPT might be besides "tiny and well-defined". I won't try to enumerate them here, but as an example if you are working in a much more / entirely functional way, you can think of your entire code-base as tiny and well-defined, even if it is composed of 1000s of functions. Can think similarly if the arch is microservices.
Sewage is far more difficult to handle than water.

You need to maintain a continuous downward slope. You are very limited in how you can have bends in pipes or two pipes join each other. You need to make sure air can get in and out of every point of the pipes, otherwise differences in air pressure will make things get stuck inside.

With pressurized water it just gets pushed wherever you route the pipes and you don't need to worry about the exact route nearly as much. Yeah, you need pumps to get the appropriate pressure on higher floors, but it's still simpler than sewage.
Basic was created 11 years before Scheme, and VB was itself derived from Basic, so would have had much of the same design decisions and considerations as a result.
Most of the things after B5 had a fraction of the budget and so many layers of bad luck (actors passing just before or in the middle of filming, production companies going bankrupt, TV channels getting cold feet). Crusade had a ton of studio meddling, so much so that they had to write it into the show (the multiple uniform changes for no reason other than studio execs wanted it, for instance).

The bad luck part has always been my biggest concern for the current reboot. They started that at The CW just as The CW entered into "will they or won't they sell/break up/destroy The CW" drama.
How many of them has already rot? I've found that 70% of ten-year-ago bookmarks of mine do not exist anymore, especially if it was a weblog or a youtube video.
Let’s revisit this comment in a year or three.
Thank you for doing Gods work.
YouTube Rahul Gandhi’s Adani videos’ viewership suppressed
Perlmutter reportedly said audiences wouldn't notice a replacement actor because "black people look the same," and was a major blocker to woman-led superhero movies because he thought they couldn't sell.
For a good few years people who were personally offended at the idea the Clovis culture wasn't North America's first inhabitants wielded a great deal of power in the scientific community. Thankfully that's basically over.
> I know that QuickBasic and Visual Basic existed and could create binaries.

Very small binaries. Unfortunately you had to include the rather large run-time libraries with them (BCOM*.LIB or vbrun*.dll respectively). IIRC vbrun300.dll was >300MByte which was rather large at the time, as well as the library functions it contained an interpreter and your executable wasn't fully native code (your code was transpiled to something the interpreter could process more efficiently, and the executable had a small chunk of native code to load the RTL and get it to execute the rest). IIRC VB6 was the first version to properly compile to native code.
I cringe at this idea, and especially when it comes to human distinction. I see what the "media" (advertising) portrays as a beautiful human body. I look at the people around me. Not the same.
> SALT allowed many of those high earners in those states to offset some of the tax burden by offsetting their federal taxes.

More accurately, before the limit, SALT excluded all covered state and local for the purposes of federal income tax, keeping federal tax policy neutral on state tax policy.

With the limit, there is a cap on the absolute amount of state and local taxes per person that get that treatment, creating a federal tax penalty for both strongly progressive taxes (which concentrate tax burden on a smaller number of rich taxpayers) and state economic success (which, for any tax policy less regressive than a straight capitation, increases the absolute tax liability per individual.)
Wait, who's talking about what? Who are you?
For sure. It can be a balance, though. In some cases, the cognitive strain of having to copy a bunch of text from a website, go to chatgpt, select a different model (maybe), write a halfway decent prompt are enough steps in the way to justify including the Perplexity extension to do the same thing in a couple quick clicks.

Also, in some cases, CGPT currently just isn't an option. E.g. summarize this YT video. (I realize this might age like milk with plugins on the horizon)
Oh no, he might look gasp _poor_ and lower neighborhood property values, thus cheating responsible savers out of their well-earned retirements.
Generates a real website (with domain, form for collecting emails or button with custom link). Examples https://60sec.site/gallery
Maybe now that the GOP seems to be at war with Disney, this makes a little more sense now, given the above.
it's a real phenomenon. like, methadone clinics for instance. a lot of people support offering methadone treatment to recovering heroin addicts. it keeps them clean. a lot fewer people are okay with a methadone clinic opening up shop in their neighborhood.
That's why a global team is important, when you sleep they work, when they sleep you work. Work is constant when you're servicing the globe.
Pass, as in "pass on the candidate (fail)". Apologies for the confusion. I've edited my comment for clarity. Thank you.
Right, stable diffusion and control net depth network could give very good results if you have a source video.
Fantastic point, and I believe the only comment in this entire thread to accurately assess the discrepancy between the groups mental health professionals have a disproportionate access to.

I would be more interested in seeing the rates of mental health professional access regarding these girls, what's the rate both parents are also talking to their own mental health professionals, their male siblings too, how often do they talk to them, etc. If I were to guess, it would still disproportionately skew towards these girls primarily because of how mental health professionals are viewed as "problem fixers". You go to them, they fix your problem so people assume. I can see many parents encouraging their daughters to speak to one ("fix her depression"), but never seeking help themselves while simultaneously being ignorant to problems their stoic male offspring are dealing with.
> Lidar's are excellent at verifying that the 3d model map is correct.

IIRC Tesla does use LIDAR in their test vehicles to measure the ground truth of their 3D model maps. They just don't do that with every single car on the road.

Examples:

https://twitter.com/gbrulte/status/1395356317410287617

https://electrek.co/2020/06/29/tesla-spotted-testing-prototy...
Actio: A Node.js framework that makes microservices invisible
At least it's not social media disinformation. \s
This is the real threat of these large AI models. They will revolutionize the ability to find vulnerabilities.

Especially if we achieve AGI.
This is some crazy NIH syndrome from Canonical.

We've been here before, of course - they pushed their own DE (the original Unity, not the current GNOME theme) for a while as a competitor to GNOME, and they also pushed Upstart over systemd. There are probably other cases I'm missing.

Eventually they gave up on those pet projects for pragmatic reasons, but Snaps seem to be the hill they want to die on (presumably for internal political reasons and/or some weak attempt at lockin).
Kinda like how marriage therapists have slightly higher divorce rates than the national average?

https://psychcentral.com/pro/do-marriage-family-therapists-h...
The French, despite having a bad rap, have it right.

Their government fears them, not the other way around. And they don't even use guns.
These always come up and there's always this internet-commenter tendency to be like "I KNEW IT: SMARTPHONES/INTERNET/LACK-OF-RELIGION/ABCDEFG ANYTHING OF THE LAST 20 YEARS I HATE", which is fine for a hypothesis and worth somebody saying once.

But it's really just a hypothesis.

Another hypothesis is that it's environmental. There's a lot of research showing depression and stress are correlated with inflammation. There are a number of other health biomarkers that are going bad fast (sperm-count, testosterone) and it's known testosterone levels inversely correlate with depression for example. Pollution is also correlated with health and mood.

So rather than declaring it over before the research even begins, let's at least consider environment.
As Rates Rose, Banks Did a Balance Sheet Switch to Avoid Reporting Losses