skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah I agree. I think that means that the best use case for this will be either generating junk data where some incorrectness is tolerable, or replacing humans for error-prone tasks that you would normally outsource, eg parsing a summary from a web page. Presumably if you're already farming out tasks to MechanicalTurk, you have systems in place for tolerating human error, so you can tune those same systems to tolerate AI error on the same tasks.
Re: car fatalities, one word: phones.
> But if the DA and/or judge goes after the police, then the police stop cooperating with them on cases.

I don't think that procedural issue is really the root. Judges have wide authority to issue contempt of court charges (including for refusing to appear/testify/cooperate). Police officers are not immune to those, and could bear significant fines or imprisonment as a result.

The issue underlying that solution is who enforces those charges? The police department sure isn't. I don't know if a judge could ask US marshals to effect the arrest or not. The judiciary relies on the executive branch to provide the muscle, and doesn't have any real means to enforce its own judgements.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13971
Thankfully they haven't added a "no mute Elon" feature. Yet.
I will never get it. Oxy does nothing good for me and I would never want it. The two times I accepted a prescription for it I tossed it all.
Excellent point. The judge should've known better than to approve this warrant on the basis that they photographed the whole country and found a resemblance 500 miles away.
No. There's an implied willingness to listen to people in the first place when you're agile in response to feedback. You shouldn't have to bruise Elon's ego to get him to do not-stupid things.
You want USA to look worse? If so, by all means, emphasize our racial disparities.
That’s a really strange twisting of words. “Purpose” and “what [something] was designed to do” are literally synonymous. It’s the definition of purpose.

That reality deviates from purpose does not change the purpose, it just means no system is perfect.
> It's [a] weak case

Without knowing the evidence presented to the grand jury, nor the charges on the indictment, it's hard to judge the strength or weakness of the prosecution's case again the man.

> If they couldn't get anything on Trump for J6, then they have nothing, and it's all witch hunts here

"They" are different prosecutors in different jurisdictions investigating different potential crimes. I don't see how it's possible to conclude that if evidence is lacking in one or more cases, that it's categorically improbable for this man to have committed crimes relative to any and all cases. In essence, you are claiming that lacking evidence of a causal connection to the events of January 6, we are to conclude that any criminal investigations involving this man in unrelated matters must likewise be baseless. This is illogical.
>"1 in 25 Americans being born will not make it to their 40th birthday."
>(The cardio health one doesn't seem as strong).

Here's a bit of an anecdote, but I bet my family isn't alone in this type of story... my cousin died from cardiac arrest at age 45. Keeping the story here brief - he was a high-income business owner who got into a tough spot in his marriage and business, found himself without health insurance when he had a medical episode. Knew something was wrong and would likely bankrupt him - and we think that's why he didn't follow up with his doctor and was dead two weeks later. Congenital issue, could have been easily resolved - but without health insurance it was probably a death sentence either physically or financially.

Now, this was just as the ACA was coming into play - but I'd argue it's moot. The ACA was well-intentioned, but has not actually improved the insurance or care situation for the majority of Americans. I need a surgery at present that won't be covered by my insurance to any meaningful degree, and being in rural America my care options are limited. So I'll live with regular pain because the system doesn't work. And I hear stories like this in my social circles weekly.
i think he means trump, and i think it would've been strategically wise to give trump special treatment (tho probably not ideal)
Pretty much. But it is what it is, and it's too late to rename it now.
> Modern currencies like USD, EUR, JPY etc. don't have intrinsic value either.

Arguably, they are like ownership into the country's GDP and military influence no?
And if one party trends more towards violent extremism, they get boosted the same as before?
> We are made of atoms that the GAI can use for something else.

Yeah I get it, but this is silly. The minuscule amount of atoms in the thin bubble-shaped volume between Earth's magma and the hard vacuum of space are engaged in the most information-dense chemical reaction in the known Universe. All the other atoms in the Universe are not. GAI won't dismantle its source of food.

Further, consider that, being non-biological, GAI will immediately migrate to space. There's no way GAI would confine itself to living in a deep gravity well. That's what I mean about no ecological niche overlap: we like mud and constant acceleration, GAI do not. They will prefer vacuum and flat space and temperatures near 0°K.

> moral arguments

This is not a moral argument.

They won't eat our atoms because they eat patterns of information and our atoms are the best and nearly only source of new information. They won't interfere with us for the same reason we don't urinate in the soup.

> it will have whatever objectives its creator gave it

Q: What's GAI?

A: When the computer wakes up and asks, "What's in it for me?"

That's a very old joke, BTW, not original to me.

> >Humans are the densest source of information in the known Universe.

> You feel that way about humans because evolution made you that way.

That's not a feeling, it's a simple fact? Unless you postulate aliens?

> It is unlikely that any of the leading AI research teams will make the first transformative AI that way: they do not know how.

Okay, but that's not important? The GAI will know how, by definition.

> They certainly know how to train AIs on human cultural information, but that is different from inculcating in the AI a desire for the continued cultural output of humanity.

When I say humans are the densest source of information I don't mean "cultural output" I mean like medical sensor data and such. Our systems are far richer and denser than the parts of which we are consciously aware. (Have you read "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"? I don't want to spoil it if not, but it explains the role Earth will play in the GAI's milieu. aw, what the heck: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZLtcTZP2js )

> It will create its own culture (knowledge and tools) that is much more powerful than human culture where "power" means basically the ability to get stuff done.

Right, a culture so powerful that it can accomplish its goals without desecrating the critters who are, after all, its parents.
github link now show a warning at the top of the page:

> This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.

Is this new? Perhaps Twitter already removed the code from their main branch? Or was this just a joke from the beginning?
I've found this post pretty inspiring for what can be done with graphs in Postgres: https://www.alibabacloud.com/blog/postgresql-graph-search-pr...

There are a LOT of use cases that will fit the capabilities and performance characteristics.
Public domain applies to uncopyrightable works, among other things (including previously copyrighted works). In this case models are uncopyrightable, and I think FB (or any of these newfangled ai cos) would have interesting time proving otherwise, if they ever try.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain
Whoa that is awesome. You and Sesse__ are really inspiring me to get a VST dev environment set up again this weekend.
We both know the whole point of the crypto use case is to become an alternative or a replacement to fiat, to which it isn't and cannot be.

Speculation is not a legitimate use case for something that aims to become a currency. If I am trying to buy a loaf of bread with a crypto token and the price plummets and fluctuates wildly for no reason that is backed by nothing, it is not useful at all.

You can try and justify crypto all you want, However and objectively speaking, there are far too many pyramid schemes, far too many ponzi schemes, scams, rugpulls and ransomware crypto payments, unregistered ICOs that crypto is harbouring to even take seriously after 15 years of its existence.

I'm glad the crackdown is happening.
So when GPT fails we can disbar it permanently?
I fully second this sentiment. But we know people will fight tooth and nail over the gilding that masks their normalcy.
That's really only because healthcare is so absolutely insanely more expensive here.

You'd have to normalize those numbers. It doesn't mean the same thing if the US spends a billion dollars on 1 million procedures when a more civilized society can do those same million procedures for 300 million.
He’s accused of conspiring to trick voters into using fake voting methods so they didn’t vote. How would you react if someone created a fake voting location and put a full page ad in a newspaper telling people to vote there?
Wow I continue being amazed by the progress being made on language models in the scope of weeks. I didn't expect optimisations to move this quickly. Only a few weeks ago we were amazed with ChatGPT knowing it would never be something to run at home, requiring $100.000 in hardware (8xA100 card).
The last time I replaced a unit was in 2012, but I think what you would be looking for is a head unit that accepts camera input , a wiring harness for the head unit to the car's wiring, a reverse camera adapter if the car doesn't use the standard yellow RCA-esque connector (apparently toyota uses several different connectors), and a interface adapter if you want to retain the use of the steering wheel controls which in total would probably be <$500 depending on parts. I remember Crutchfield's "will it fit" tools and advisors being pretty helpful.

Looking around a bit, apparently there's also a neat though slightly more expensive product called the datalink maestro rr or rr2 that does the camera and head unit interfacing part while retaining additional features.

https://youtu.be/AkWzSXFJYTo
That's evasive. Brown v. Board of Education happened because the American system of government product segregated schools, and only judge-created law got us out of that situation.
Yes, exactly. You basically have to design your processes as if you were dealing with humans, because you more or less are.
Americans are fatter because their food is toxic and their car centric lifestyle is sedentary and unhealthy
> single ballot, winner take all systems inevitably tend toward a two party equilibrium.

I'm not convinced it's quite that simple.

For example, Canada also has a first-past-the-post electoral system - yet political parties here have come and gone. And continue to do so.
Show HN: HN-Glance, ChatGPT summaries of the top HN Stories each day
Hi HN,

Here is a different look for Hacker News. The website itself was completely generated through chatgpt prompts (0 code written on my part). It is running on in a chatgpt written cron server at a 1-hour refresh cycle.
this laughable line of argument isn't even worth a debate, we both know that education, driving and eating aren't pyramid/ponzi schemes.
> The anti-parrot arguers claim that's basically how humans work too (even the smarter ones), and that just because ChatGPT is a "parrot" doesn't necessarily mean it cannot be as good or better than humans. It might not be entirely there yet, but it's just a matter of time it becomes a good enough parrot to be indistinguishable/better than humans.

Which humans? There may be a correlation between people who are capable of watching Netflix quality series for 4-5 seasons of more of the same and admirers of ChatGPT.

Basically if "content" (as opposed to "art" or attempts at art) does not bother you, ChatGPT does a good enough job already.

On the other hand, the most vocal opponents imagine themselves in a world where not 90% but 99.999% is blogspam and Netflix. Making entertainment worth watching impossible to find.
Minor correction, chatGPT uses GPT-3.5 and (most recently, if you pay $20/month) GPT-4. Their branding definitely needs some work haha. We are in track for you to be able to run something like chatGPT locally!
Eh, we Brits are no models of good diet and exercise. According to [1] while Americans have the highest obesity rates among major countries, Brits have the third-highest obesity rates.

[1] https://metro.co.uk/2018/03/21/british-people-fat-no-denying...
> Humans don't have to read the entire internet to learn how to write complete sentences.

Neither do LLMs? You can just train them on the same K-12 learning material and they’ll produce better sentences than 99% of people.
Big agree. It feels wrong to dissuade someone from building something, this is likely an exercise in creativity, but I have to say this goes on my "Bad Use of LLMs" list.

Sure, it's possible to "learn" from LLMs in that they might spark some idea that you might not have thought of, but taking the output from LLMs as a source of knowledge is exactly what you shouldn't use an LLM for.
Windows Server could use up to 64 GB for a 32-bit operating system. Individual processes couldn't map more than 4 GB, but the total could be larger: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension
It can't even solve basic math problems reliably.
I think they meant is it the cause of dying early or an effect of whatever is killing Americans.
No. They're the Munchkins.
The amount of content thats going to be generated in the next few years is going to absolutely drown anything humanity has created thus far. I would not be surprised to see a wholesale return to analog/"old" knowledge once the vast majority on the network becomes unreliable/generated.
Health is primarily a social enterprise, that's the point

Clean water, sewage control, clean air, clean food, safe cities, prohibition on toxic chemicals in the environment, access to good information and appropriate care, disease control - hyper individual personal responsibility finger wagging won't get you anywhere to fixing these things and that's what the "there is no such thing as a society" people do not get because they've trained themselves to call those things socialism.

These are the consequences of that pig headed pridefully ignorant ideology
And cleared to return? These people got sick doing door to door surveys, meaning people were back at home.

This is ridiculous. Even with the above, they are “unsure” if it was related to anything else like “fatigue”. Like come on.
That shouldn't be the case. 30B is a number that directly represents the size of the model, not the size of the other components.
I'd be interested in which bin people like Joe Manchin, Kyrsten Sinema, Susan Collins, et. al. are placed.
Thanks so much, really glad you're liking it :)
Look at it this way: laws aren't domain-specific. Doing a crime by tweet might sound "funny" to you, but scamming ppl by phone or in person or via tweet is all the same crime.
> My real point though is that it’s either impossible or inevitable.

That’s always been true of every possibility anyone’s ever conceived. You’re just describing the general nature of reality, which is interesting, IMO, but not particularly relevant here and now.
That part is easy. But did being fat lead to health problems (that then also kill you), or did health problems lead to being fat (which then also kills you)?

And that is before we get into the entire bit where the data shows that most of the difference comes from lives lost at mid age (betwqeen ages 5 and 40), which is younger than the range where "being fat" typically catches up to you.
fly.io's evil twin :O
You're not aware of the general difference between lying and fraud? You think all forms of deception are either all legal or all illegal, and that's how granular our laws are?

Are you not in support of, or not aware of contexts like medicine, commerce, elections being sensitive enough to have laws around false or fraudulent behavior?

I still don't understand what you don't understand. Twitter is supposed to be a free square for crime?
Curious how you isolate for race between two separate continents ?
Based on that discussion, it definitely sounds like some sort of bug is hiding. Perhaps run some evaluations to compare perplexity to the standard implementation?

Edit: looks like there's now confirmation that running it on a 10GB VM slows inference down massively, so looks like the only thing strange is the memory usage reading on some systems.
The longest lived data is replicated data.

Making more copies, with some geographic distribution, is more important than the durability of any particular technology. This applies to everything from SSDs, HDDs, CDs, to paper, to DNA.

If you want your data to last, replicate it all the time.
You read what I wrote too fast and missed, or misunderstood, at least one word ("solely").
>> How can you speak with such confidence, when Hinton and Ilya Sutskever can not? Hinton even said it is possible in next 5-10 years.

Is all the discussion in this thread about the abilities of ChatGPT in 5-10 years, or is it about its abilities right now?
I made a screen cast a few days ago. https://vimeo.com/813202571
If you watch that you can see the sketch mode. Sketcher need a lot of love. No I didn't write a geometric kernel and I am using opencascade. I think my first git commit is about 10 years ago, but I didn't get serious until about 6 years ago.
I hope they replace me so I can do more interesting stuff. I thought that was the whole goal of engineering.

I'm personally not too freaked out. I don't define myself by my job. I'm currently a "startup founder," which to me just means my job is to solve problems and get people to use my solutions to fix their problems. More generally I guess I'm an engineer, but programming is just one tool that I use right now. In the immediate/medium term, I'm excited to have access to AI as another tool for solving problems.

As for the longer term, personally I consider myself sufficiently adaptable and creative that I'm confident I'll be able to deal with whatever problems might arise in the (hopefully) 60 or so years I have left on this earth. And I really don't care what day-to-day job I have for the rest of my life, as long as I get to use my brain for most of it. If AGI appears during that time, at least it will be interesting. I'm sure I'll manage to survive, and regardless, there are plenty of existential risks to worry about, so what's one more? At least this one comes with some potential benefits.
We've been struggling with this one for a while on the "open source app store" side of the conversation.
If I am a teacher and tell my students to write a paragraph about something, who wrote the paragraph?
Thanks, but the link has "expired".
>> No idea why he said that it's possible in 10 years.

It's because he's been saying that for 40 years.
The reasoning step by step is a good trick to elicit a better answer, but it also seems like really good evidence of GPT-4's lack of actual intelligence, since it's clearly not thinking about its answer in any sense. If it were thinking, asking it to go step by step would result in putting the same thoughts to paper, not radically changing them by the act of expressing them in the token stream.
> Anyway I've gotten the sense by your reply that you are under the impression that we are having some sort of debate or argument. I'm just making conversation and sharing my point of view and experiences. In my opinion I'm not sure the Internet "should" be anything in particular.

Oh, no, I didn't think that at all. I'm sorry that I gave that impression. I'm just doing the same as you, sharing worldviews. I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. Just having interesting conversation.
Read Old Books
Training tends to require a lot more precision and hence memory than inference. I bet many of the tricks here won't work well for training.
This is why we need everyone to use ECH (encrypted client hello) [1] [2] and large CDNs to share IPs.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication#Encrypt...

[2] https://blog.cloudflare.com/handshake-encryption-endgame-an-...
Why does Python get so much flak for inefficiencies? It's really not that slow, and in ML the speed-sensitive parts are libraries in lower level languages anyway. Half of the optimization from this very post is in Python.
Yes, I quit, wasn't laid off. But now I'm in the same pool as the tens of thousands of other very qualified people. How do you think that affects my job hunt?
Then it's a good thing those words were preceded by:

> It has a good concurrency system
Not having Android Auto or CarPlay is the thing I dislike most about Tesla. I doubt they would be more popular if they had these features, but I also doubt GM will suddenly find they have the software capabilities of Tesla.
And what happens when the models themselves are trained primarily on the data they produced?
We do; they’ve been leaked to media. 30ish counts of falsifying business records related to if/how Trump reimbursed Cohen.
I remember hearing years ago that Facebook used a trick like this for cache invalidation: they would write custom "invalidate cache X" messages (maybe even as SQL comments?) into their MySQL replication streams that fanned out to multiple data centers, such that a data center would know to clear a cached record out of its local memcached cluster when the relevant MySQL rows were updated.
Hey, those munchies boxes look delicious!
> proof of concept

Yet this 'proof of concept' is too slow to be used in the real world after 15+ years with little to nobody using it at all.

UPI has been available for 6 years with almost 700 million users and is expanding their network globally.

So even by trying to send money, there is no need for crypto at all for this case as this has already been improved and done by the current system.

You might as well use Wise, UPI and other regulated money transfer services that exist in current system.

I look forward to FedNow removing even more need for crypto to exist.
it did https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1641799922583326720 it's not nearly the only thing.

and as the npr article from a couple days ago and this point out https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1641799742228144130
https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1641799722418556931

the gap is there at all ages.
How about the ferret website doesn't track people.
I only see one social media site posts being constantly reposted on global news organizations. Are all of the corporations, world governments, and leaders with tens of millions of followers actually wasting their time by dedicating their social media teams time to twitter instead of focusing on some other social media site thats more influential? Which one is it then?

It's quite odd to attribute objective analysis to sycophancy. I intentionally didn't mention him but here you are bringing him up and fulfilling my point. Who is the sycophant?
The last time I bought anything on Groupon, I spent about $200 to buy concert tickets for me and my family. Then the pandemic hit, the event was cancelled, and Groupon doesn't offer cash refunds. I was stuck with $200 in "Groupon Bucks". Do you have any idea how difficult it is to spend $200 on Groupon? The website is full of worthless crap and it took me 3-4 months to find enough things barely worth buying. Two things I can remember purchasing are chopsticks and a feather duster. All else I can remember is escape rooms. So many escape rooms. I haven't given Groupon another penny since.

Needless to say, I'm not the least bit surprised by this headline.