skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Then it doesn’t work but their developers are ssh-ing from their work laptops so it doesn’t matter. Something doesn’t have to be a solution for all use cases to be a good solution.
But it does waste a lot of space... there's a lot of duplication of keys (which are deduplicated in the iPhone app), and with other information (somehow I have hundreds of "com.apple.cloudd.deviceIdentifier.Production" in there). And I already mentioned organization fails. Plus it's kinda insecure as it enumerates your accounts exhaustively without asking for a password like iPhone/Safari (granted, not a problem specific to this app). And the interface to view the passwords is terrible. Old and familiar is not synonyms with "good".

However now that comex pointed me to the Password in the "System Settings" app, I at least can use it and it's fine if Keychain is left as is.
"Why keep looking at the stars through these telescopes? We all know the Earth is at the center of the Universe, the Pope said so. What good does it bring to you?"
We just saw this submission. I'm the author along with horvski. We are happy to answer any questions.
> I don’t, but obviously the CFTC doesn’t either, otherwise they’d have spelled it out.

Or, they do know and more detail wasn’t relevant at the complaint stage of the civil case, whereas it might be to the actual trial and to the parallel criminal referral that it has been reported that DoJ is investigating.

A civil complaint is not required to be, and generally is not, a catalogy of every piece of relevant information the filing party has. And it especially isn't a catalog of everything they know where a civil lawsuit isn't the venue for addressing it.

> If the CFTC believed Binancing knowing facilitated criminal activity on the part of Bitzlato, that’d be in the complaint.

No, if the CFTC believed that, it would be in the criminal referral to DoJ, and, if DoJ could support it to the required level to move forward, it would be in the criminal indictment DoJ would seek from an appropriate grand jury. Those typically lag considerably behind civil action from the same regulatory-body investigation (sometimes with indictments issued after the civil complaint is settled or otherwise resolved.)
> although actually getting away from that can be harder in practice.

Sure. A rational company will say "the more profitable way is to reinforce Google's position, so we will do that". At the end of the day, the goal of a company is not to build a nice product, but to make money. If making money means going with the monopoly, so be it.

The only way to change it is to make it more profitable for the company to support the alternative. But in this case I can't see how a law could enforce it (how would it even formulate that?), so the monopolies win. That's sad, but that's how it works.

That's also precisely why tech is part of the climate change problem and not of the solution: we don't build tech that help the world, we build tech that makes money. And making money means using energy, which means burning fossil fuels. Technology destroys the planet because the rules incentivize it to do so.
Or just app engine honestly.

Works with docker containers so you can run the same simple stack locally as in prod. No need for more exotic serverless architectures.

Generous free tier, too!

Have only good things to say about it for quickly firing up a product.
There is one case where Rust breaks this rule for the sake of simpler syntax. Send of Futures:

async fn send_peekaboo() {
let _r = std::rc::Rc::new(());
// async {}.await;
}

fn is_it_send(_: impl Send) {}
is_it_send(send_peekaboo());

If you uncomment the .await line, this crates a possibility of moving thread-unsafe Rc across threads, and the Future stops being thread-safe. Rust catches this problem correctly, but it is a case where function body leaks into the signature.
The key is that every company is very happy to lose this kind of customers.
Dextrous Robot Teleoperation System
We're only just seeing expectations for the tech inflate now. VCs will probably pump money into LLM-related companies for at least a couple years, and it'll be a couple years after that before things really start to decline.

It's late spring right now, a strange time to start forecasting winter.
We don't need to all be able to use the tech for it to be known publicly.

Apply your same logic to any other easily misused tech:

"We must all have easy access to bio-engineered viruses. Otherwise only..."

"We all need to have access to nuclear weapons. Otherwise only..."

Not all tech should be in everyone's hands.
Yea I agree, fine to smack SUVs down in cities, but taking them away completing is not productive.
What I don't think it being said very explicitly in other responses is that it depends on the law and the circumstances.

In the case of anti-money laundering laws, my belief[0] is that it is very illegal to tell a customer they are being flagged.

On the other hand, if it's a copyright thing, or some kind of contract dispute? You're normally totally free to tell the customer.

[0] No professional experience involved, just a lot of reading patio11/Matt Levine.
Anything you would like to share? Those hundreds of sheets would be useful for the community, and would be eligible for a $2000 open source prize.

Or if you'd like to tell us what you did in private, we'd appreciate that too. team [at] scrollprize [dot] org.
I really hope the government does not intervene in this process but I know for a fact they will want to.
This. Greenfield products should be serverless by default. By the time you have sustained traffic to the point where you can run the numbers and think that you could save money by switching off serverless, that's a Good Problem To Have, one for which you'll have investors giving you money to hire DevOps to take care of the servers.
They weren't playing dumb. The writer cherry picked the comment to make them look worse and the bait was obviously swallowed.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/disney-ceo-bob-igers-layoff-1...
I think you could push that setup far. I'm not familiar with GCP or Cloud Run, but it probably integrates nicely with other services GCP offers (for debugging, etc.).

I'd be curious to read if anybody has that setup and what scale they have.
That is a disservice to society. Students and workers everywhere are forced to deal with stupid headlines on their OS 10 hours a day, while the people who make those machines get to opt-out. Ridiculous.
poetry is specialized in managing venv and packages, with the options to run some commands.

doit is a task runner: you declare a name that groups several commands, and when you call the task with the name, it runs all the commands in order. It can accept bash commands, python functions, declare dependencies on other commands or on files, and cascade the tasks to follow those dependencies automatically.

It's make, but in Python: nice syntax, works on windows/mac/linux, easy things are easy, hard things are possible.
You're "probably" right, but it's not something I'm going to place bets on with the level of uncertainty. When you have some companies still sitting on war chests of tens of billions of dollars, and almost nothing to spend it on, not investing in AI is a risk in itself. If your competitor succeeds they may rapidly take parts of your market while you now attempt to reproduce their work.

Also if these 10 billion dollar models are 'AGI' level, then your model pays for itself if you can find enough interesting work to throw at it.
Rather a dubious choice of analogy since there was a massive gasoline shortage in the US in the 1970s: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/piapeterson/photos-1970...
Definitely if they weren't running very complex services or their business tolerated an occasional maintenance window.

The particular way Kubernetes can bite you is that it makes it much easy to start with far more complex setups - not necessarily much harder than to start with a simple setup! - but then you have to maintain and operate those complex setups forever, even if you don't need them that much.

If you're growing your team and your services, having a much bigger, more complicated toolbox for people to reach into on day 1 gives you way more chance of building expensive painful tech debt.
Embracing Grice’s maxims may help here [0]? Being a pit of cynicism isn’t a particularly nuanced take, please do better than that.

0: https://youtu.be/IJEaMtNN_dM
Ask HN: Successful one-person online businesses?
This question was asked a few years ago (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22858035) by committed, and I'm curious what it looks nowadays.

> How many people on hacker news are running successful online businesses on their own? What is your business and how did you get started?

> Defining successful as a profitable business which provides the majority of the owners income.

> Have any recent trends affected your business?
FWIW, I have a fancier machine, but don't have any of that optional equipment. I have a decent and consistent burr grinder, but other than that my optional equipment is the tamper and a toothpick for distribution. This is mostly because the biggest variable I seem to deal with is bean quality and age, and the only way I've really been able to get consistent results is purely by feel based on how the beans look in the filter basket after grinding and a quick stir with the toothpick. The result is that I generally get the shot spot-on about 9/10 times. As for the 10th, an iffy shot can be turned into a decent latte. ;)

In any case, I think all of the extra equipment definitely helps with consistency, but I think one can get good results with practice without all of the extras. At the very least, one could work their way up to that point.
Me too. Now to try and figure out if I can create a Macro to launch this.
Sound, image and video we’ll ravish through (already happening); is temp and gravimetrics valuable? (I don’t know; it’s a question) Games might be a source too. But yes, the world itself is a good source. So maybe that won’t freeze it over; computing power/energy?
Maybe the EU can do something for you?
GPT4 is clearly magic, no matter what mechanism backs it the fact that we managed to get rocks to think and reason about things in a convincing matter was absolutely unimaginable a few years ago even.

but the future is very unclear.
Hey everyone, I wanted to share my recent experience dealing with orphan objects in my Ceph cluster. I wrote a blog post on Dev.to that explains the issue in detail and includes a Bash script that I used to solve the problem. I would love to hear your thoughts and feedback on my approach. Check out the post here: https://dev.to/raminnietzsche/the-great-orphan-object-hunt-h...
Sure but they can make extra penalties for using these in illegal acts. For example robbing someone, and robbing someone while using a gun get different sentences.
Yerba mate as well
Its a different kind of tech. A society changing tech that can be used surreptitiously. It needs to be in people faces in (for example) the form of over the top and ridiculous memes.

That is not possible with or comparable to, things such as bioweapons.
Did anyone say otherwise?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/disney-ceo-bob-igers-layoff-1...
Well, I'm HOPING for that, but not RELYING on it...
I still question the wisdom of giving data to the worlds largest spyware company that makes its money by converting mass surveillance into dollars.
> So enlighten me, what is the actual $$$ threshold where "terrorist financing" can be deemed a legitimate complaint?

I don't know, more than the percentage of your average multinational bank? No large financial institution is going to have literally zero unsavory characters using its services.

> Crypto space is chock-full of scammers, hustlers, bad actors, and organized crime. Which of the crimes are worth paying attention to and which aren't? Has the bar slipped that low that some crimes are "small" and aren't worth going after?

The point of my comment and Matt Levine's article is that they are not going after these things. They are superficial artifice on top of the real thing they are going after them for: allowing US HFT firms to trade there.
Viewing this sort of issue as equivalent in personal magnitude and meaning to Galileo’s heliocentrism dispute with the renaissance church is exactly the perspective I seek to avoid by framing my mindset like the earlier commenter, personally.
A parallel criminal investigation of Binance has also been reported, and if there were a criminal referral from CFTC that would often take several months longer before charges are filed by the DoJ compared to CFTC filing a civil case. So, nobody is going to jail, sure, at least not yet.
Crypto wasn't good enough as a currency, so what was coming in terms of that use case didn't pan out en masse. But it did work to an extent for some people.

Crypto's value fluctuation made more sense as a speculative asset class, and it clearly saw most of its traction there.

It's potential as a currency did lead to banks, financial institutions and governments taking a hard look at it. And CBDC's are an area of active investigation. So the hyper-optimists may have been off on some of their predictions, but something came out of it.

AGI-agencent tools are more grounded. They don't threaten to tear down existing entrenched institutions. They do one thing simple: commoditize and scale some level of intelligence. And they're pretty good at it, hence the hype.

Unless humanity develops a deep distaste for many things AI-made, the fascination will wear off and we'll be left with the cold hard truth of raw productivity increase and digital production on an unprecedented scale.
Regarding the second part, I totally agree, either use cloud or don't. For some reason, most companies want to be cloud-agnostic and so they stay away from things that are too difficult to migrate between cloud providers.
This but for the Mac Library now please (the format transfer are a mess)
The non-crazy right laughs at, ignores, or (as eldritch_4ier said) mostly does not know what "Q" is.

The left's equivalents to QAnon get 17.5K upvotes and 2.5K comments on /r/politics, articles in The Atlantic, and nightly IT'S HAPPENINGs on Maddow.
I would not use k8s unless we are convinced it will benefit us in the long run (think about constant effort that needs to put in to get things running). k8s is not magic. I would just stick with docker-compose or digital ocean for small startup. OR rent a VM on Azure OR if you really really need k8s use a managed k8s.
something that considerably helped my communication was to transition from "what this intelligent person said is patently wrong" to "in what sense is this intelligent person correct".

It saves me and everyone else a lot of time, because if the obvious black-and-white response were needed I probably wouldn't be having the conversation in the first place.
Yeah, I a think other browsers want to be able to test whether there is a saved password or not, and get the corresponding username, which is quite a big permission to give away. For actually filling in the password they could maybe offer a pop up where the user must authorise the app using biometrics or some other OS-level action. That’s already the experience with safari.
> [K8s] allows dev teams to not worry about all these things; all they must do is to write a simple YAML file. More importantly, teams no longer need to ask DevOps/infra folks to add DNS entry and create a Load Balancer just to expose a service. They can do it on their own, in a declarative manner, if you have an operator do to it.

Yeah, as opposed to Cloudformation or Terraform, where you...uhhh...

Don't get me wrong, it requires work to set up your corporate infrastructure in your Favourite Cloud Provider(tm) to make those things available for developers to manage. But it takes work in k8s too - even the author says "if you have an operator to do it". Kubernetes is great for what it's great for, but these are terrible arguments in favour of it.
Cool idea. Typed in some things but there’s no submit button on the text field? (Im on mobile)
How is it that

> I recommend you immediately add identity verification (state-issued identification verification)

and

> The genie is already out of the bottle. The degree of effort to put this together is low enough that it will be replicated around the world.

are thoughts that end up in the same post?

If the genie is out of the bottle, it’s your proposed solution that everybody that runs a model like this implements bank-style KYC?

What do you propose should happen when this sort of software becomes freely available for everyone? When (not if) that happens, what will your suggestion have accomplished?
It's not great, but the app you are looking for on macOS is Keychain Access
I doubt it matters much. Bash's $RANDOM is implemented using a linear congruential generator, which is not suitable for cryptographic applications anyway.
Exactly. Would love to see some testimonials on that...
Author here, you two mind telling me which operating system / browser / screen res you used? These render crisp on all my devices with macOS/ iOS in Safari and Firefox. Could be Chrome does sth I have to disable.
> Or, they do know and more detail wasn’t relevant at the complaint stage of the civil case, whereas it might be to the actual trial and to the parallel criminal referral that it has been reported that DoJ is investigating.

> A civil complaint is not required to be, and generally is not, a catalogy of every piece of relevant information the filing party has. And it especially isn't a catalog of everything they know where a civil lawsuit isn't the venue for addressing it.

Cool, so we're back at zero evidence of any of this happening. We agree then.
I’ve been doing this for decades now. Anything I do has “make deps”, “make serve”, etc. I don’t care that Make “wasn’t made for this”, it is ubiquitous and reliable at it.
Seems like a temporary problem. Surely OpenAI will have a version which runs in a customers public cloud VPC, orchestrated by OpenAI.
OpenAI is selling others data in their model responses. Selling others data is their main business model.

If it uses user data to train their models other users could ask "Show me the code for gmail spam filters", and if it was trained on engineers refactoring that spam filter in ChatGPT chances are it would give you the code. If that doesn't count as "selling user data" I don't know what is. They not only sell it, they nicely package and rewrite it to make it easy to avoid copyright claims!
Which ISPs are giving our traffic data to Team Cymru? We need them named and shamed.
Make POWER great again!
I'm 100% certain that people will offer up their own voices as open-source. I would be happy to, albeit maybe anonymously.
https://forum.winworldpc.com/uploads/editor/82/fnzv4nyssemk....
I remember the hype cycle around this thing called the "internet" back in the day. People said it was going to take over the world, even though back then it was slow and kinda sucked.

And then it did.
Google: Forget ChatGPT, Buy New Age of Margin Expansion
> More busy work will be automated taking away some of the fun and leaving the harder tasks thus making jobs shittier

Since when is busy work fun and hard tasks shitty?
> Chatgpt will then handily convert the project [..] to Rust

That’s more or less impossible if you mean idiomatic Rust without chock-full of unsafe blocks. Besides the (probably ironic?) overhype of ChatGPT, Rust’s lifetime-memory patterns are a strict subset of what is expressible with correct Zig/C.
How so? I have a Makefile in all of my Python projects. Never had issues.
Yes it is true.
> I suppose you could argue about whether the CFTC's relevant regulations protect anyone, but they certainly think they do, and if so it's easy to argue that Binance was skirting those protections.

There are two weird things here. The first is that the CFTC does have purvue to protect the American people. However, if Binance were to simply say “we now accept US citizens” — the trading cited here would be allowed. Market makers are accredited investors.

It’s rather because they offer services to investors who are not US based which, if they were offered to US investors, would only be allowed to be offered to Accredited Investors — Binance has chosen to not offer services in the US, and allowed Accredited Investors (the same group who would be permitted if they did operate in the US).

The case is interesting. Even though these traders were operating significant portions of their business from the US, the claim will be made that they were acting as their international subsidiary.
The way this was "sold" at my workplace by the CEO reads exactly the same as whichever top executive I've been reading recently since this whole "back to the office push" started. A sad script fed to the masses to justify maintaining the status quo for as long as possible. Because people are seriously stupid.
A composable pattern for pure state machines with effects (draft v3)
So an executive order for something congress already did? It also seems to just limit how they can spend money on commercial spyware in 2023, they have a good number of ways to work around it if they need too. Election season is here and the president got a photo op.
Jane Street and Compilers (2018)
All these "aids" always have to be born by the Deaf people, not by the hearing. At least these have some chance of actually working, I suppose, unlike those ridiculous gloves one sometimes sees celebrated.
> You don't need a $10k-$30k machine to get a competent dual boiler

Commercially, you do (I own a small cafe chain so I can claim some knowledge here). The Lelit Bianca is a beautiful home machine but you can't use it commercially - first of all, due to safety certs (not sure about the Bianca specifically but most small home machines don't have commercial certs). But also because it just isn't built to handle a morning rush of customers. I don't think you could make more than 10 or so lattes in a row before it would lose steam.

> I'm not sure I agree that they're mechanically complex. They're engineering 101. A pump, a heater and a thermostat. They're rather mechanically simple

I think that list is missing a few of the components that make up an espresso machine :)

https://66.media.tumblr.com/2a1cfb37655e5ddc1dfa820b15eefca9...

But nonetheless I agree, there are far more complex machines in regular use. My complaints are more about warm up time, hard limits on how many coffees you can serve in a row, and electricity use.

> That's true but I argue they don't need to. We don't need to iterate on everything. Technology doesn't always make things better.

I partially agree with this but again, from a commercial perspective I guess I have different goals. Actually at home I use a Flair 58 manual lever machine and a hand grinder. Beautifully simple and I could heat water using a wood fire and make it work.

But commercially, I want the tech I use to improve. I want better efficiency, better reliability, and lower energy use. I don't have the numbers for our yearly electric bill just from the coffee machine, but it's a lot and a good chunk of the day it just sits there reheating water over and over.

It's the same as saying you should never need to upgrade your work laptop. Wasn't the 720p screen you had in 2005 perfectly adequate? Why do you need more than 1gb RAM?
so you want to self host via the cloud?

... why not just use the cloud at that point and skip having to roll your own everything?
Blame the PM/PO and executives who greenlighted the tabloid filth for “engagement” metrics going up
Constitution of the USSR had freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press and many other rights unknown to its population, and severely punished when attempted to exercise those rights. North Korea is a pretty chill place too if you judge it only by its constitution.
If not Teams for reasons discussed here, just anything of note would be a good trust-signal for CTOs.

I don't think it is likely.