skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It is, yes, but it's a moot point because nobody is getting punished here.

To the rest of the world, a court that picks sides and issues symbolic arrest warrants isnt a real court at all.

If country A undermines international law that opens the door for country C to commit atrocities with impunity.

If country A's citizens only condemn country C then they're only interested in mob justice.
Interesting idea. If so, it was a risky gambit, and also they only get to do it once, because the next bank is bigger than SVB. Do they really care enough about lowering interest rates to play such a risky gambit, which can only be played once?

Also we are coming on the debt ceiling limit at some point in the next few months, which might trigger a crisis of its own. If I were a VC I wouldn’t play my one-time hyper-risky card before seeing how the debt ceiling shenanigans play out.
I think the comparison is useful to folks trying to wrap their head around the hype; it's natural to ask "is this crypto all over again" and the answer is very clearly no.
There are people that still have their accounts frozen because they donated to the truckers in Canada. That’s insane. Other countries had or will have similar cases in the future. We absolutely should have a way to exchange money without the governments involvement. The government already has the monopoly on physical force. That ought to be enough. So yes, there is a use case. But you’re correct in that it hasn’t really been used that way so far.
> I'd like whatever leadership in charge to know that they do not have absolute power to run anyone else's life.

That, and I'd also like everyone to know that money, markets, and everything are a joke. The value of USD is just what people collectively agree on it to be, not some inherent fundamental value. The same is true for TSLA stock, GME stock, ethereum, or the shitcoin-of-the-week.
> Op is not saying that having estimates is useless, but rather it should be a management task rather than a developers burden.

Count how many people are also complaining about their managers giving timelines to clients. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
I really hope this proof holds up.
I’ve been on and off mac’s since the late 90s. Contrary to the article and similar to comments here, their OS was never that good until last 10 years - not the other way around.

As I got older, I got less time to fiddle with drivers on linux (Nvidia/noveau drivers ptsd, wifi drivers…) why can’t it just work!?

The title should be the other way around: Apple is making Linux Great Again.

Having limited but excellent hardware configuration makes writing stable software easier.
Interesting, I don’t keep up with this space but maybe such hosting has got so cheap that it becomes a rounding error in their overall infrastructure.

Just opened an account to try it out and everything went smoothly, very clear instructions.
Their ToS seem reasonable for a free service.

It seems that there are other similar free hosting services, someone else mentioned render.com that I also didn’t know about. This one might be better for those in the EU since it is hosted in Poland.

From their announcement last 4th of August: https://forum.serv00.com/d/1-serv00com-a-revolution-among-fr...

> Where's the catch?

> We will try to ensure that the services offered are of the highest possible quality but for this we must introduce a few restrictions:

> There cannot be more than 10000 active accounts on the server at the same time

> Accounts that will not be used for 3 months will be automatically deleted (logins to the web panel and SSH are counted)

> We do not give any guarantees and SLAs for the free hosting services we offer

> Help and support only on the forum - https://forum.serv00.com/
Mmh, you should probably ask chatgpt.
Asterisk after the author's name on the cover, leading to some brief explanation of what kind of changes have been made. There doesn't need to be an exact list.
If your mechanic gave you a 1 month estimate to fix your flat tire, they'd deliver on time every time
where do you see any suggestion that Hans lacked all intelligence?
A complete lack of focus stealing prevention, for one. Corner notifications that never go away even though I'm clearly trying to ignore them. Suddenly typing into some random new thing instead of where I want to be typing.

"All your 32-bit programs are dead now, yes including your paid-for games. Lol."

"OpenGL and Vulkan weren't invented here, we'll make the same thing, but not compatible, instead of supporting them."

Apple's file system is still shite. "file cannot be deleted because the disk is full" is a Kafka style nightmare message.

Mac users are also a significant horror when you go asking for help with any of this, they generally have gone full Stockholm syndrome and will blame the new victim rather than the captor.
Let ChatGPT run free on random webpages and do what it likes
(Not the commit author, just an "interesting" commit I saw)
Yeah but institutional investors were just starting to hold much larger positions within the last few years. They are much more sensitive to interest rate hikes than individuals.
So going by your comment about the embeddings, it still doesn't have any understanding of the concept the words it's grouping. The only thing it actually knows about these individual words is which part of speech they are and which group they are in
Even GNU make has $(filter ...) and $(filter-out ...).

It'a terrible name, by the way. A filter separates; it has two outputs. Does a function named filter return the filtrate or the residue? And I just had to look up filtrate to check which one of the two it refers to and what is the opposite term. From now on I will remember that there is residue captured in a filter, and filtrate is not that.
The same way you would with a human developer. Plan it out, break it down into bite sized tasks, give the AI each task or parts thereof and plumb it all together yourself.
Orson Welles Explains 'The Other Side of the Wind'
RIP. I just got done implementing a modified version of LZSS which is crucial to fitting all the music into a game I'm writing. Respect.
Interesting that crypto mining lead to a GPU rush and directly benefited sales of Nvidia GPUs that they would feel this way
That's good, a lot of machine-generated art can be good at compelling human emotion. This was true before ChatGPT existed, and you shouldn't feel bad about appreciating aesthetic beauty.

However, I think it's worth reconciling the parent's point with your own worldview. You may feel attached to these LLMs, but that's mostly because they're designed as affirmation boxes. They fill-in-the-blank with whichever token the sampler passes to them, it really is that simple. Humans and AI can arrive at the same outcome (circumstantially), but they will use different means to go about it. ChatGPT and it's contemporary LLMs do not have a model of self. They're good at convincing you otherwise, and it's completely fine to ascribe human emotion to that writing - but you should at least acknowledge that it's just writing.
>Beyond that you’re talking multiple sessions of work as it charges

I actually prefer this. It forces me to take breaks, which prevents me from over-working myself when left to my own devices.

It also neatly defuses any toxic family expectations about not taking any breaks until the job is done. "Can't. Battery died." :)

This works great if you can do a lawn in 2-4 sessions. I agree you need something different for even larger lawns, but at that scale you're already looking at a lawn tractor or zero-turn (which can also be electrified).
I eagerly anticipate the day CUDA no longer has a stranglehold on ML libraries; it's just absurd that one must purchase Magical Hardware when damn near every laptop has a GPU in it just not the GPU
It's a joke. Jokes are fine. Jokes about anything are fine, as along as they are jokes.

You didn't think this joke was funny, and that's fine. I thought it was funny, and that's fine.

Calling it a "Nazi-ism", is also fine, but if that means he shouldn't be allowed to say it, that is not fine.

See the following picture, it kinda captures the point:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FrrVOoFXoAEOWYe?format=jpg&name=...
>I don't think so, because the needed 'quality' is the ability to traverse space. So I don't think I agree that the qualitative piece is missing.

It's not the distance that keeps us from the moon but gravity. The needed quality to get to the moon is the ability to escape the gravity well, and chairs don't provide that.

These models are impressive but they aren't general intelligence, and I'm not sure this type of model ever will be.

If we look at it the other way around. These models have consumed more textual and graphical information than any human could ever do in a million lifetimes, and yet for most questions they don't really answer any better than the average human could. (They're much faster, so for the specific cases that they're right that's very useful).

So there is some key thing missing. I would say it is the ability to understand the text they are consuming and generating.
To be fair, Larry has the deepest pockets, and it takes some balls to stand up to the likelihood of a lawsuit.
My wife has been in the US for about 25 years at this point, and we just had our talk about how to pronounce February, Wednesday, and turmeric yesterday.
Because capital is necessary for growth and the more expensive capital becomes the less growth is anticipated.
The overlap between the two is significant.
But you are going to make more money, invest it and have your wealth snowball. Then you can retire earlier and choose to do the exact thing you want to do earlier since you have money.

And at certain curve the amount of money yoh make matters a lot, if you have base expenses. Making 4k vs 2k is technically infinite gains if your expenses are 2k. If you become more efficient, but don't make more money, then you clearly need to work on your ability to sell yourself. And if your expenses also grow equally to what you are making more, that is also on you.
anonymous flagging without provided reason should be gone on HN yesterday
I've counted upwards of ten advertising insertions in WaPo articles. Between paragraphs.

On desktop, I'll nuke any interstitial element (including "related stories" and the like) on sites. The calming factor between post- and pre-edited sites is ... somewhat nuts. One of my faves was old-school Buzzfeed, where I nuked anything but the actual headline and feature story, which I'd called "Unbuzzed".

(And yes, "Buzzfeed" itself is mostly trash, "Buzzfeed News" was/is actually somewhat respectable. I generally didn't seek out the sites, but occasionally clicked through on links from elswewhere.)
First of all we know very little about how we work. We have sone ideas and some observations but know nearly nothing.

We have no idea how consciousness works. “It’s emergent” is not an answer.

We don’t even know how memory works or creativity or really anything. We can observe certain chemicals and electrical changes when exposed to certain things but that explains very little and there’s 1000 fables about why this type of partial knowledge is very incomplete.

Explain religion and spirituality. There’s no consensus on determinism.

We know very little. But we do know that the entire human condition and experience is far different and complex and impossible than a stats processor running on a von Neumann machine. Because I can explain to you precisely how that works.
Might be a bug or a data issue, especially given some are still visible.
rumours say late 2023
https://www.macrumors.com/roundup/macbook-air/
Here, the Dumpster trucks at this particular neighboring property sometimes take 10+ minutes. It's not always a jolted-awake-but-you-can-go-back-to-sleep-and-not-remember-in-the-morning thing. :)

That dirt from the leafblowers includes clouds of pollen, mold, feces, fine particulates, pesticides, etc. :)

(That some poor recent-immigrant landscaping workers carrying huge gas leafblowers all day might also be destroying their hearing, and breathing those clouds themselves, (PPE imperfect or nonexistent) only makes me feel worse. Sometimes they work in groups of 2-3 leafblowers at a time one one property, I suppose for speed or billable hours, so they're also getting noise and clouds from their fellow workers. I can't get mad at the most immediate person/people involved, since they're being scrod much worse than me.)
I don’t know, I like your reasoning but isn’t it more complicated than that? Bootstrapping imo is the best way to go if you don’t wanna give up stake but the reality is that going to VCs makes much of the process much easier (funding). Without the VC system, would we have to go back to a traditional loan process? I find that backwards and I would assume founders will like getting money from VCs better than banks at the start (after all, most loans may not even be approved if you’re starting out).
And this will happen on every edition of every book?
At https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204055, Apple provides instructions for a bunch of stuff you might want to export:

• iCloud Drive files
• Photos and videos
• Mail
• Contacts
• Calendar
• Reminders
• Safari
• Notes
• Voice Memos

And/or you can use https://privacy.apple.com/, which is basically Apple's version of Google Takeout.
I noticed your username after reading your comment, and was not surprised.

For some reason, it seems the former USSR is highly prominent in compression algorithms. RAR, PAQ, encode.su, etc. and of course Andrey Markov.
I came here to say the same thing. It's either that or Parkinson's Law [0], usually expressed as: work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion. I find that for myself it is true, when I have more time, I take my foot off the pedal. When I am running late, I work harder to meet the deadline.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_law
Sure! We agree - though it would be nice to know if I can come back to it tomorrow or in six months.
Do not underestimate the enormous amount of dysfunctional logic in the non-dev population. You don”t code what they ask, you code what they need. That doesn’t change with AI, it gets worse.
This was roughly my first thought, too. It may not be nefarious, though. In many software projects, if you know what you're doing, there's a lot of work that's useful-but-optional that can be delayed to the end stages of the project. So then you front-load all your hard requirements so that you can minimize the risk that you'll miss any of them. Once that's sorted, you can just knock your way down the rest of the to-do list until you run out of time.

This is actually how Scrum is supposed to work, and most the Scrum rituals are just a formalized process for doing that in a collective ownership setting. But at some point we forgot that and started confusing the means for the ends, and it all kind of fell apart.
Absolutely, how dare those uppity colonials subvert the unipolarity of His Majesty King George.
Right - it should be the logical pivot for anyone previously operating in the cryptocurrency space (assuming they weren't just in it for perceived profit potential...)
Is there even a theoretical way that this could happen? Seems essentially impossible. The whole thing with neutrinos is they just _don't_ interact with anything except _extremely_ rarely.
Restart support was added using `podman-restart`

https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/17580

Buildkit needs a full API implementation

https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/13889/

https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/11780
> On a typical PC keyboard of today, the Caps Lock is pressed by the weakest finger pinky. The Ctrl key can be easily pressed with palm

I wonder what size hand is needed for this technique?

I'm typing this on an 1980s keyboard that was originally created with the control key on the home row (and yes, the Enter key is labelled as Return too). It's a lot easier to Ctrl-C if I can just slide my hand slightly to the left with a slight turn to the right. The technique being described using the palm involves a lot more contortion.

Also, the use case needs to be considered. I am not a vi user, but if I was, it would make a huge difference in ergonomics and comfort to have the control key on the home row. vi was created with that layout in mind.

I like that the caps lock key is small and tucked away in the corner. How often do I need to type in all-caps for an extended period? I HAVE NOW ACTIVATED THE SWITCH USING MY PINKY FINGER STOP IT IS HAMMER TIME STOP
You can't have it both ways. Either you ask the developers for an estimate and you get ridiculed because how can developers possibly have any clue how long it's going to take them something? A day, a month, a year, who knows how much time this CRUD service will take! Or you don't consult with your developers, but then you've made an unrealistic promise with a number pulled out of your pants and you're the cause of all the suffering in your team.
There was no usable web browsing on a phone before the iPhone. It had the most advanced browser.

There was no iPod level music players on a phone before the iPhone. There were crappy music players you can revisit and compare.

Mail apps on phones were crap.

Messaging was crap, in tiny little screens.

Just a few things.

People reviewing and getting the iPhone the time was wowed and think of it like magic. It's people not having it, and dismissing it outhand because it had a touch screen or because their unusable Windows ME phone had some crappy third party software that didn't get it. Of course all of those got either the iPhone or an Android clone of it very soon and never looked back.
Every project I ever worked on was more like “okay we already building it” and estimate was the last step after spending hours of discussions. My manager was typically had enough clue to estimate themselves too.
I don’t understand what this article is trying to say at all. Why did it bring Ventura into it?
> the same way people would use "Just say no" or other slogans ironically.

Just Say No was a largely ineffective advertising campaign from over 30 years ago.

MAGA is the slogan of the previous and possibly next POTUS. This is serious business, and there's a lot at stake. Perhaps democracy itself? I make jokes all the time, but I wouldn't casually joke about this.
Not negation, but refutation, and yes, you can refute a false induction given an observation that contradicts it. But you cannot prove a positive induction, no matter the evidence.

I forget what we were arguing about. Please go ahead and have the last word and thanks for the exchange.
> You know about google translate, I assume?

You cannot be seriously suggesting that the quality of AI generated text be evaluated through the broken telephone of Google translate. That's absurd.

> Forsooth, to claim we're not but mere reaction,

aaand it already fucked up by the second verse. My comment clearly states that we are not mere reaction, yet this "AI" seems to think I claimed the exact opposite. You're proving my point, it's just guessing what word fits where, not understanding anything whatsoever and producing garbage as a result, that only seems intelligible to gullible fools.

> if I were to take THC or LSD or whatever, they too would have predictable effects on my mental state.

I don't think I've ever heard anyone describe the effects of LSD as "predictable". I'm guessing you've never actually taken it and are talking out of your ass.
I think of it more like extremely efficient large-scale Cargo Culting. It knows exactly what it should look like, without any conception of why or the originating factors that led to it.
It's not reflexive to critisize US foreign meddling. It IS reflective because it requires considerable consideration to puncture the fabric of US internal propaganda and reach these conclusions. The problem is that it's built on a web of lies and treachery. That's not a very smart attitude to take between whole nations of people. Maybe it is if the end goal is further ethnic domination, subjugation, and/or exterminaton-- which the US has done and still does, systematically.

There are bearings a country can take, foreign relations wise, that over the long term that lead to better outcomes and just quality-of-life improvements in general. Benevolence and smart relationship management com ined with military dominamce has immense soft power, of which the U.S. has left unexplored.

I just found this reading up on S.Pacific politics:

Weiner, Tim (9 October 1994). "C.I.A. Spent Millions to Support Japanese Right in 50's and 60's". The New York Times. Retrieved 29 December 2007.

Add japan to the laundry list where these organized, professionalized, politically motivated paramilitary "groups" involve themselves in the democratic process of other nations, with absolutely no control or oversight from the very society they comes from.
Money flows out of equities and into bonds which yield a higher more dependable return when interest rates are high enough.

The equities market was already running at artificially inflated values for some sectors (like technology), which means there isn't much growth potential (if everything is deemed to be already overpriced), and so the outflows were quite significant from those sectors, accentuating the inverse relationship between equities and interest rates.
Why divert when we could mirror
While I worked on cryptocurrencies and have changed to primarily focus on secure, private, anonymous network protocols (because the potential for speculative abuse is less, giving credit to your suggestion), I still would like to say that this is an example of whataboutism.

Money is power in a distinct way that freedom of information, in general, is not:

You don't need to believe in a (digital crypto) currency for it to hold value:

As long as someone else believes it, you can make them do things for that currency.

I believe this potency is what makes the scum of the Earth flock to cryptocurrencies.
A user doesn't care. Your boss cares if the competing company built the feature in half the time as you and snatches half your user base.
>It didn't have copy and paste.

Most people in 2006, just before the iPhone came out, didn't have copy and paste either. They still typed T9 style like it was 1996.
That video is loaded with inaccuracies.

They make an inexplicable Top Gun/Tom Cruise reference which suggests they don’t seem to know the difference between the F-15, F-14, or F-18. Or perhaps even between the US Navy and USAF.

I’m not aware of any plans to send F-15s to Ukraine. I have only heard of F-16 and maybe F-35.

The video thumbnail shows F-15s with a single (offset?) rudder.

There’s a reference to the F-11 which seems to actually mean the F-111.

There is a reference to an F-22 Megaprojects video that doesn’t seem to exist. They may mean F-35 here.

They claim the F-15 was active in Vietnam when it didn’t enter combat service until 1976. This may be another mistaken F-14 reference.

The video claims the F-15 C and D are no longer in service with the US military but they are.

The gun is not in the nose, it is in the wing root.

The AIM7 and AIM9 were not new for the F-15C. Both are from the late 1950s.

F-15E weighs more than the F-15C/D.

The video suggests that the F-15EX and F-15 II are different planes but the F-15EX is the “Eagle II”, the same plane.

The F-15EX is not claiming to go mach 3+. It is mach 2.4 capable, similar to the F-15C/D.

Jordan didn’t have Mig-25s, the Syrians did.

It’s so egregious I unsubscribed from the channel before my Gell-Mann amnesia could subject me to further incorrect information. It’s a shame because I enjoyed these channels but now can’t trust them.
To me, they both seem to be about deliberate and organized defiance of social behavioral norms.