skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Some dogs, notably rottweilers, make similar vocalizations even when relaxed. Search for 'rottie rumble’ to find clips with examples.

I don't know anything about wolves really, but with dogs, most individual components of body language are pretty ambiguous. For example,

- many dogs will rapidly wag their tails just before getting into a vicious fight (it doesn't just mean 'happy')
- dogs will generally bare teeth as a warning/threat, but some will also show their teeth as a greeting (Google 'heeler smile')
- some stress/calming signals (e.g., pulling ears back or lowered tail) can occur as normal parts of safe, mutual play

To get a sense of what a dog is feeling and how it might act, you really have to integrate all of its body language into a single context.

All of that is to say that if someone who works at a respectable wolf habitat/rescue tells me that a growl-y vocalization from a wolf is not always aggressive, I don't have a hard time believing that.

(I'd love to learn more about wolf body language and how it differs from that of domestic dogs!)
I do not. I think it's a pretty good idea, though.

I have learnt a lot of things the hard way in 20+ years in tech / corporate life, there are a lot of truths that can't and won't be spoken about inside a big company. I've also done some career coaching in the past few years, and I think something specific for tech / development would be pretty good for a lot of entry level people.

I guess your 3 bullet points are really just general career issues and not really tech focused (which is fine, a lot of this stuff is pretty universal and probably applies just the same to accountants), but I think maybe mixing in some more tech focused advice would be helpful. (e.g., you really need to learn some basic shell / scripting, grep, git... if you have some complicated system that is failing, you might need to remove some complexity instead of adding more, etc.).

Maybe share a link / email address?
However, "the future technology is completely unpredictable and we don't understand it" is probably a fairly good reason we will only make worse mistakes in that regard going forward.
My team of 7 (inc manager and pm) does 2 stand-ups a week (doing it in slack is okay if needed), and never sprint planning or any other recurring meetings. Any other planning or meetings is done as hoc as needed. We usually have ~3 projects going on in parallel so not many cooks in kitchen and not a lot of syncing required. We use jira for tickets and have a “sprint board”, but it’s super casual just a place to track stuff and I roll the sprint once a month without any meeting or ceremony.
If that's not what you're asking for, then it seems you're asking for a flowchart that determine's someone's gender. Gender being a social construct (as opposed to sex) there is no decisive flowchart other than: ask them; accept the answer. If you want something generally accurate, I stand behind what I said above.
I think it was intended?
There's some doc on twitter who was denied by insurance and he filed a board complaint against the insurance doc claiming malpractice. I think he won.
The whole idea that "we need to decide" presumes that there is a collective "we" that's separate and distinct from the individuals and corporations releasing this stuff into the world, and that "we" participate in a collective decision making apparatus that has any effect whatsoever on what new capabilities get invented and released into a networked world where borders, boundaries and jurisdictions are all but meaningless.
You're talking about widths, right? You can definitely buy varying widths, but only some brands sell wide shoes, and even then, you are very limited. (I have very wide feet. Saucony is pretty much the only brand that consistently has models that can fit me.)
> If I was in a public system, I’d fear I’d be fighting for attention alongside the general public

Ah yes, how dare the plebs interfere with the path of the chosen ones.
Here, this was written entirely by chatGPT:

https://sumplete.com/

On page 24 of this paper, there is a 3D game with enemies and objectives coded by GPT-4:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.12712.pdf
Your view is the one with less evidence.
> which may have resulted in the selection of certain traits

Genetics doesn't work that way. At all.

1) there weren't enough generations to change the population genetics. Bear in mind that African populations tend to have a wider range of diversity than other regions.

2) we've done a lot of population DNA studies, and they don't indicate any such differences.

3) there's no simple mapping from genes to educational ability, outside of extreme cases like genetic diseases.
There are two different ways to go about this question:

- asking about the scope of a programming language is asking about the intended programming situations one wants to cover.

- what is a good balance between convenience (sytactic sugar, "features" and abstractions) and asking the programmers to write out things explicitly.

- more subtly: who is using the language, what concepts can be expected to be known to the programmers.

These are of course connected: a particular type of recurring programming situation may lead one to think of patterns and a need to abstract them, whereas to someone who intentionally constrains the scope to a specific area, it can be easier to keep the number and kind of source or "programmer intent" abstractions low.

Often these discussions happen in the context of a general purpose language but there is little consideration that some programming situations are better served by DSLs.

Also a decision on "MIT vs "New Jersey" (worse-is-better) style affects the whole thing, as the notion of correctness is at some level always one of programming situations (a higher level discussion on using the API right way, checking error conditions etc)

Thus is a long-winded way to say: in the end the starting point matters. C++ can be considered a failure language design if you consider it from the readability/cognitive load angle but design choices seem to consistently be about permitting all possible choices. This is why Stroustrup can claim things like "you can write memory safe C++" and not even be wrong. Java can be considered a failure in concision but tool support means that programmers do not pay the cost of writing everything out explicitly.

Haskell and anything in the academic tradition will emphasize abstractions and demand more and more knowledge from users whereas industry tradition will be biased towards low (or lower) cognitive overhead, but if one is willing to specialize, there is an infinite number of nuances of possible points in the design space. We will see more programming languages and come to accept that there will be many that we use at the same time.

So rather than asking how big, maybe we should wonder how to understand the involved trade-offs.
I don't have an engineering degree but I have called myself an engineer for years. I'm not licensed or bonded. But it's getting to be drab, everybody does this. So I stepped up my game and now I call my self "Doctor Professor." I'm thinking about trying on Father, Senator, and Colonel too.
Perhaps he's beginning his transformation into the Third Bogdanoff
"farmers really don’t like it when they kill off their livestock."

You say that like it's shameful for them to feel that way.

Pet owners really don't like it when wolves kill off their dogs & cats, either.
Before the Victorian Era, nothing about womens' lives was well documented, so you can't exactly infer an absence of education from the absence of evidence.

What we know is that the very wealthy often had private tutors for their daughters, and that some women also learned a lot from their parents. Records exist that describe the tutelage of aristocratic and royal women, and it's not hard to extrapolate that those professional tutors probably needed other clients (from the less-well-off aristocracy and merchants) to both "climb the ladder" and fill the gaps between aristocrats' daughters.

An interesting tidbit in this regard is that we actually do know that the women in the (middle class) Bach family were as musically-educated as the men, since they ended up as leading sopranos in opera houses. Some people theorize that the Bach women were the ones teaching their sons music, not the men.

Universities definitely aren't the only places to get educated, and they were a men's club for a shockingly long time. Women were getting higher education in more private settings.
Could you please elaborate? One must trust programs that handle data to handle data, that requirement is difficult to get around.
What would be the problem with requiring all healthcare to be non-for-profit? You can still have it privatized, but you can’t ever be in a situation where you’re trying to maximize profits. Someone poke holes in the idea…
The real numbers (everything on the number line, including things like 1, 0, 4/237, and pi) and the integers have no such correspondence. The reals are an "uncountable" infinity.
I’ve used it for some time, it’s overall good, but it has some issues:
- Users privilege can be tricky sometimes, in some cases I wanted to give admin access to some users to some specific apps installed, it didn’t work.
- Customization wasn’t that straightforward, and even if you go extra mile and change things manually, next update you will have the default ugly logos and favicon.
- Didn’t try it long enough to check the security, but the admin user was that time still uses a password instead of a key pair like my AWS, and didn’t see any 2FA for the admin panel, unlike others like webmin.
So it’s overall great for home use but wouldn’t recommend for any enterprise use.
Lex Fridman is one of the podcasters on the planet right now, hosting celebrity guests for long form interviews.
An MRI in the US without insurance coverage can reach up
to several thousand dollars.

Heck, WITH insurance you can expect it to cost up to around $1000 depending on coverage.
Fewer "decorations". I imagine it would look more like Ocaml than Rust or C++ because the grammar of Ocaml is such that you don't really need brackets or braces or parentheses most of the time. And "system" languages like C++ and Rust are notorious for being symbol soup, which is unavoidable if you want to control every single detail of every single thing.
I currently study https://github.com/DoctorWkt/acwj which is quite interesting I have to admit.

I'm interested in this topic, because I want to participate in TinyC compiler's development; I use it quite often to run C demos of mine and its execution is instant.

The least I can do is to either fix bugs or extend it to support more C99, C11, C17 features, and why not even C23 as soon as it gets approved?

All I need is to gain the necessary knowledge and experience to jump right in and start fixing things.
Yes there are so many tedious devops incantations I’d love to hand off, but my first thought watching the video (where it wgets a jar file and runs it) was we’re going to see the return of hard to contain worms being accidentally spread by AI sysadmins.
It also is used to help with irregularities associated with periods. Seems like sidestepping the issue to say there are other acne remedies.
<div class="hidden">Actual name: Batman</div>

Most explicit CSS rules allow you to spot this, implicit rules won't and possibly can't.
I’ll openly admit that I’m a cynical person but I’ll believe economic revolution when I see it.

The advent of the personal computer also caused lots of huge proclamations of computers doing our jobs while we sit back in sun loungers sipping drinks. Yet somehow, here we are.

The people in charge of the AI systems are the same (class-wise at least) as those in charge of the economy so there’s no incentive to rock the boat. I expect AI to be something similar: it’ll change the way many jobs work, hopefully for the better. But people will still be working in sweatshops making clothes because it’ll still be cheaper than the alternative.
Microsoft reportedly orders chatbot rivals to stop using Bing’s search data
Tylenol 3 is not available in the US without a prescription, no formulation of codeine is. Besides poppy seed bagels, that is
Yes, absolutely. In three different instances, I received boards from China faster than I received quotes from American board shops.
Multiply by 10 million units and you now save $100,000 by using that chipset. In reality, as I understand it, the price difference is often at least $0.10 between the dirt cheap chip and the one with a nice developer experience.
I am kinda shocked no one has posted this yet: https://xkcd.com/1179/
Yeah, I walked into a person who refused to have good-faith discourse.
Maybe I live in a bubble, but the disagreement tends to be between different regions, not between individuals within a region. So unless the woman is a transplant from a pro reproductive rights region to an anti reproductive rights region, I don’t think the sort of interpersonal conflict you have in mind is likely to occur, where the man is vehemently anti reproductive rights and the woman vehemently pro. At least I believe it happens infrequently enough to not assume it as a default.
Calling abortion (which is only one element of what is meant by “reproductive freedom”) “terminating reproductees with extreme prejudice” is a dysphemism by any reasonable standard.
It's remarkable how unremarkable that interview was.

I think a major problem I had is that there was very little new substance with lots of nonsense. One of the biggest criticisms about transitioning from non-profit to for-profit can basically be summed up as they "needed to raise capital but don't worry, we're still ethical". Or the ongoing discussions about safety and bias that have been discussed to death at a very superficial level. Or a question about how much parameter size matters is basically "we just want to do what's best". How about some insightful answers from someone with first-hand knowledge instead of answering like a politician running for office?

Lots of weird circle-jerking as well about how he's one of the few people that can maybe make AGI and how powerful that makes him. I feel like the interview is completely detached from the real world where it basically comes down to advancements in technology and data. We saw how fast Stable Diffusion covered ground. Also really feels like it's too sensational to be talking so much about AGI - idk why Altman is acting so mysterious about 'democratizing the process'. Make the models public. Make the research public.

And of course there's the typical Fridman nonsense. There's a whole section on 'Elon Musk'. Not even really his history with the company, but about twitter drama. It's distracting how much Fridman worships Elon - like he's made multiple offers to elon to run twitter only to get ignored.
> I say "My values are [ ], and I want to make sure when I do things they are aligned."

> And then later, I will say "I did this today, how does that align with the values I mentioned earlier?" [and we talk]

That's a prompt; and one I don't think I would have tried, even from your first post.

Prompting overall is still quite experimental. There are patterns that generally work, but you often have to just try several different approaches. If you find a prompt works well, it's worth sharing.
I was most worried about #2 but surprised how much temperature seems to have gotten that under control in my cases. The author added a HallucinationChecker for this but said on Mastodon he hasn't found many real-world cases to test it with yet.

Regarding 3 & 4:

Definitely take a look at the existing examples in the docs, I was particularly surprised at how well it handled nested dicts/etc. (not to say that there aren't tons of cases it won't handle, GPT-4 is just astonishingly good at this task)

Your project looks very cool too btw! I'll have to give it a shot.
Unpopular opinion: prompt engineering is basically an AI priest.
To be fair, Apple released their iPhone after building iPods for 6 years. So, it's not like they had zero experience with handheld devices at the time.

Also, while Apple did create their first chip (at least of their current families) in 2007, they did acquire 150 or so engineers when they bought PA Semi in 2008. So, that gave them a leg up compared to building a chip team completely from scratch.
I have been to an ER in a top US hospital. Waited 6 hours.

This anecdotal evidence is garbage.
I discuss this topic briefly in a post I recently made where I call it "decorative knowledge" and try to pinpoint exactly what GPT is doing and fails to do.

https://buildingbetterteams.de/profiles/brian-graham/navigat...
I get a screening in India when I visit some family there. Full blood work, you call in the morning, they come by the house and draw it, results in the next morning. It's faster and cheaper to do that, including the flights, than to try and get this done through my doctor in the US.

So, yeah, go for it.
Yeah. Widths are very badly defined. I also have wide feet; in Europe I find that some random Ecco models fit me well, but finding them is a puzzle every time. They're even worse than Apple when it comes to model name consistency over the years.
I did this for the first time yesterday. I wanted the links for ten specific tarot cards off this page[0]. Copied the source into ChatGPT, list the cards, get the result back.

I'm fast with Python scraping but for scraping one page ChatGPT was way, way faster. The biggest difference is it was quickly able to get the right links by context. The suit wasn't part of the link but was the header. In code I'd have to find that context and make it explicit.

It's a super simple html site, but I'm not exactly sure which direction that tips the balances.

[0]http://www.learntarot.com/cards.htm
Lex Fridman Podcast #367 – Sam Altman
:) Agree, but the scraping arms race is way beyond that, if someone doesn't want their page scraped this isn't a threat to them.
I agree with you that parsing, for most people, or even most software engineering people, are much more useful then the other stages. Code generation is also interesting and could be useful too but that's pretty much the two of them. All the "interesting" stuffs people spoke about (e.g. optimization) actually has very few use cases unless you are working on it directly.
Probably more worrisome to me is taking for granted the way we've bred dogs to be gentle, calm, good-natured, etc. Most people don't do much to train their pet dogs or even learn to communicate with them. We more or less get away with that, societally, because dogs are insanely good-natured. Dogs give us so much 'for free'. I think without that, like when people just keep wolves as pets, things look a LOT dicier.
You might be referring to this PCB manufacturer in the EU.

https://www.eurocircuits.com/
On the other hand, it kills your battery.

Back when dictation was done in the cloud, I could dictate all day on my iPhone no problem.

Now that it's on-device it kills my battery in a couple of hours.

The latency is absolutely improved, and continuous dictation (not stopping every 30s) is a godsend.

But it does absolutely destroy your battery life.
There's a famous experiment I just saw on Nature again, where two puppies, one dog and one wolf, both raised identically around humans, are given a test:

Find the treat that the human points at. The dog puppy follows the cue, while the wolf does not.

That doesn't mean there's anything wrong with the wolf, but it's genetically less likely to defer and learn from the human.
What are the reasons you've heard your friends give? I don't know anyone who's done it.
unfortunately -> unfortunate

The last sentence missing a word.

One could argue the abbreviated words are also an indication.
> Unfortunately India is no longer a democracy.

> It is really sad to see the world's largest democracy fall.

The last time I voted it was still a democracy. Did someone come along and destroy the whole election process. If not stop being overdramatic you are just embarassing yourself.
Do you know if an American could go to where you are and pay for an MRI and doctors visit out of pocket?
With all bad news comes a silver lining. At least with the cancellation of Everyone & Their Mom, I won't have to hear Emma Chee ever again.
Tick tick has a free version. Reflect does not.
Do you think your health care experience represents the median healthcare experience in all 5 countries?

If we divide up people into percentiles based on wealth, 25, 50, 75, 95, how do you think people fare in the different countries? How do you think they the median experience is in America?
Video Game Writer Chris Avellone’s Accusers Retract Allegations of Misconduct
Sure blame the experimentalists. If the theorists are so smart maybe they can use their immense brilliance to draw on their chalkboards with femtoscale precision. All joking aside, while you are correct that we don't really have the technological ability to advance on a better theory of Quantum Gravity. But theorists need a rich experimental backdrop for their work to be meaningful. Since this is lacking, theoretical physics has produced a glut of plausible models that all arrive at similar answers from very different first principles. This leads to the sense that none of them are decisively right or wrong and the pursuit of yet more models is a meaningless project. Yes the root problem is with the experimentalists, but the theorists suffer the consequences.
With remote work how will they know they aren't hiring an AI?
Google is investing in Starlink and Space-X so maybe they are pivoting to a new kind of jam.
https://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/en/firearms/authorization-carry

There is, but it's not very common at all, and not in the sense that you can just grab a gun and wander wherever you want.

I've always wondered if they process the application without any of the work check boxes checked. I assume the answer is "no".
Sam was a great pick, OpenAI will do well under his stewardship. Execution is important, but in this case, also humility and caution. Always interesting to hear about these internal power struggles and dynamics.
These kind of one-shot examples are exactly where this hit for me. I was in the middle of some research when I saw him post this and it completely changed my approach to gathering the ad-hoc data I needed.
I'd love a GPT based solution that, provided with similar inputs as ones used by scrapeghost, instead of doing the actual scraping, would rather output a recipe for one of the popular scraping libraries of services - taking care of figuring out the XPaths and the loops for pagination.
I'd recommend reading those that disagree with race-based admission (Jason Riley for example) as to why it tends to be a bad idea.

My take on the argument against what you are saying is that it is effectively lowering the standards for certain groups of people to get in. This can 1 of 2 effects:

(1) those that are admitted to a college where the standards expected of their students are higher will mean that these lower-performing people will fail out.

(2) the university either lowers the standards for all, or creates specific majors that are "easier" for people to attempt to be able to graduate.

Neither of these are good options.

Guess what? Life isn't fair. Kids that grew up in a family that promotes education and learning will perform better in these high-tier colleges (on average). The reason is that the kids were able to (or forced to) perform to certain standards much earlier on in life (see Tiger Moms). Kids with parents that don't have the time (or care) to focus on a child's education will obvious not have the same skills/training at 18 compared to some others. Does this make them less smart? Nope! These kids can still be served very well by lower-tier colleges where they can still learn a lot and develop their skills. They just aren't as prepped for certain universities.

If we want our society to continue to be a meritocracy, holistic review needs to DIAF.
Soul is not a thing that is demonstrated because its nature is extra-physical, it is something you are informed of by divine revelation.