skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Highways are no different from healthcare. I don't care if the government does them. You use it you pay for it.

You have no idea how much I make, which your claim entirely depends on. You also don't seem to be reading very carefully, I'm stating what I believe should happen. I would like people to be forced to pay for less things. You would like people to be forced to pay for more things. Simple as that.
The premise is the same as saying people can 3D-print their own widgets, nuts and bolts. The average person cannot do that to any reasonable level without a template that includes the right parameters. Templated entertainment fails because the viewer can see the ending coming a mile away.

It is the same with anything where AI is expected to fill the gaps. With a 3D print template you get something generic that just works. The last thing that people want in entertainment is something whose ending they can predict.

Writing screenplays is a skill, and AI provided by large corporations can only fine tune their output on the basis of whatever is out there, and the generic massively outweighs the original. Which side will AI go with?
Exactly, I use 'gio trash' on Linux for this reason. And I let a cronjob do removal of all the .Trash with find -ctime +180 -exec rm...
The enterprise architecture group at my employer seems to do nothing but introduce unnecessary bureaucracy and mandate tech choices with no input from those who have to use it.
the claim denier worked for insurance. he had a complaint on file for entering a hip replacement backwards

the tweeter thread shows devastating images . the point is that a provider like that, has no business denying coverage. plus apparently he was not board cert and other issues from lapses in licensing
Ruffle – Flash Emulator – Progress Report
Yeah, those concepts agree with each other, so there's still some value to the simplification once you know the complex explanation.

This is more of a sabotage mission, where the examples are meant to convince of their own inadequacy (and the inadequacy of rigid logical thought).
The title got me scared for a bit. Turns out, the problem is that people do not dose it correctly. And also, they often mix products which may contain acetaminophen but the person taking it doesn't know.

I guess that makes sense. There are so many people in my life that I've heard saying "X medicine has done wonders for me, better than paracetamol", but I've had to explain to them that X is just a fancy way of saying paracetamol/acetaminophen.
> How is it that Docker Inc., creator of one of the most important and ubiquitous tools in the modern software industry, has become such a backwater of rent-seeking and foot-shooting?

My guess: Because not all good ideas are profitable. Especially in software.

I read most but not all of the article, so if I missed this already being stated, that’s egg on my face.
In what animals does this actually happen? Can you give actual examples, please?
This is a lot to read. It says there is a podcast link in the email but I don't see a link. Do you need to be a subscriber?
ES has support for vector search now too. Really you want both in use cases where the user expects the the top results to contain the search keywords, but also wants results that are synonyms or conceptually similar. TF/IDF and BM25 help with first part and vectors help with the second. Theoretically only vectors should be needed, but that isn't my experience in practice.
"there should be no laws against tobacco, alcohol, drug abuse, gambling because people can't possibly be misguided by powerful corporate interests for profit or otherwise"
He's simplifying for the press.
This may have actually been my bad: once chatGPT gave me what I asked for, I would think about it some more and tweak the code manually, especially if it was a low-effort edit. Consequently there will perhaps be some bugs: I’ll fix this one, thanks for sharing!

I hope you do play it for a positive number of rounds though :)
Ok, a picture of parent id is ridiculous. I didn't know that part.
Model S is aluminum but Model 3 is all steel.

I've only needed one repair of my Model 3: a new side mirror and it was about $725 CDN in parts. My insurance wasn't able to secure the part and going through tesla directly it took about a month before the part was available. On the plus side the part was replaced right in my driveway in under 15 minutes by Tesla mobile service.
It’s not the lawmakers who will be bit, that’s true. It’s any company, and their users who are targeted by an incensed enough Karen.

Picture a GitHub.io site that hosts images of nude art.
Well, embarrassingly I made a typo, it should have been 08 March 2023, but no matter.
Claiming that public health officials said there is no link to myocarditis is the lie. You've been duped. Try reading reputable news sources instead of conspiracy theory blogs.
Do you have any evidence you can provide that it is true?
I might just play this for Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY rounds. I’m having a good time. Thank you for using your time to make and share this.
Exactly my thoughts. I can't believe the calculus here.
I disagree with you here. Off the top of my head, these are the things I like about embedded C++ (and embedded Rust):

* RAII makes modern C++ a lot cleaner for things like holding locks, disabling interrupts, and other stuff that needs to be unwound at function exit, and doesn't need heap allocation. Until C gets 'defer', the cleanest alternative is gotos.

* Operator overloading is pretty nice for code where you have custom data types (like 2-element vectors), which can be very common with DSP systems.

* References give you a non-nullable pointer type.

* Template-based data structures are much nicer than the C alternative: macros.

* std::array is kind of nice, and doesn't have dynamic memory. Also, while std::string is pretty unsafe, std::string_view is very nice!

* For the few dynamic data structures you may want to use, you can write a quick allocator and hook that into every std data structure you want rather than writing your own data structures. The "null allocator" strategy is an option: just return the same pointer to one fixed chunk of memory, and fail if the data structure grows too big. You can also do the "init allocator" strategy: Only allow dynamic allocation during initialization.
> So, size is really the only relevant discriminator.

No, its not, see the vast horde of use/function based exclusions starting at line 165 comprising code section 13-63-101(10)(b).
I don't know why they want the "old internet" in a thread talking about protecting children lol.

When I was 13 I was playing CS 1.6 on dedicated servers with a small number of strangers that were like 30, I was also on I don't even know how many random forums with small numbers of users.

It's like a 13 year old hanging out at some random adult's house vs walking around a mall.

I can't see how a bill limiting access to websites with more than 5M users is going to reduce paedophilia.
But it should show up to Shownew? That's where it doesn't show up. Sorry if I didn't clarify that, will edit.
Do you think one would have to be on a network with at least 5 million users to get this sort of support as opposed to a smaller one, perhaps specifically oriented towards this sort of stuff? The latter is as legal as before I think.
A claim denial will result in patient responsibility, which ends up with a service but costing patients a lot of $$.

OR in this case, the pa was denied for the cpts requested. In which case care may be denies by the provider or facility
Ya would be awesome
The eye can't see inside of itself. The metaphor breaks down though, because the inside of an eye are in principle _seeable_ (mirrors and microscopes etc), while the "nature of language" or whatever, is in principle _unspeakable_ , no so much as a coherent thing to ask after.
It feels like there are an influx of "vector databases" right now, I haven't had a strong answer out of anyone on why you'd be better off using these over Redis which offers vector storage with similarity search in a battle-tested OSS solution.
Technically it's not spelled out, but chances are Utah law enforcement / regulators won't accept a tech company's measures if a kid can just say another one of their own emails is their parents' and can then consent to the social media access themselves. Everyone affected by this will likely outsource it to a company like Stripe with their Identity product, where you're entrusting Stripe to do the ID verification and to delete the data once it's been verified.
Oh. I’m not aware of that. That would be a contentious thing to do for sure.
There are some crates that let you do that. For example enum-ptr

https://crates.io/crates/enum-ptr
Aw thanks, this makes my day!
30+ years of experience here, having worked on all kinds of very large scale VALUABLE legacy systems used to run airlines, airports etc. around the world:

1. Always prioritise work based on customer priorities. Not your personal subjective preferences. So keep a list of To Do’s in customer selected priority order.

2. Always and only work on the #1 customer priority. If the code to solve #1 priority needs refactoring then FIRST write system level tests that specify exactly what the code should do. And then refactor, followed by adding the new feature.

3. Goto 1.

It’s simple. It works.
Social media, crypto, gambling and the cigarette industries should be legislated away. Yes.
They've taken stories about a very small number of cities, albeit large metro areas such as San Francisco, reapproaching how they prosecute shoplifters or how police prioritize responding to shoplifters. Not only is shoplifting not legal on a broad scale, but it's a very disingenuous interpretation.
As an external consultant every time I see this scenario it’s always a group that is too busy digging with shovels to learn how to operate the backhoe.

Literally just last week I was showing several dev teams how to cut days out of their troubleshooting time by using an APM that can capture debug snapshots from production. Combine with source indexing during builds and code versioned with the Git commit id and you can jump to the line of code with the issue in about a minute. You’ll see the stack variables and everything. This is possible even in a distributed microservices monstrosity.

It takes like a day to wire this up.

“We’re too busy for that today, there’s an issue in production!”
How does this compare to Joplin (joplinapp.org)?
That's not what I said. There is a balance to be found. I only objected to "this restriction actually makes everyone free (to do what I think they should)" being used as an argument. If enough people agree, sure, you can ban social media. The reasoning should be a cost benefit analysis though, not "my laws shall make you free".
This already exists and we know what the outcome of it is. It's alternative medicine. Insurers will gladly and gleefully let you do holistic woo bullshit because it saves them money.

A 'free market' as you state just results in people falling for bullshit care.
It is impossible to backtest an LLM.
The same reason the media doesn't focus on the biggest theft category: wage theft.

It is easier to vilify individuals than to reduce the need for food theft (depressed wages and lack of economic opportunities for most people)
My interpretation is that the words written down are just pointers or triggers to other thoughts, ideas, and interpretations. The words themselves (the ladder) can be thrown away and it is no longer important to know how you got to your current state of mind.

I’m not completely in agreement with this philosophy if indeed my interpretation holds water.

A related concept to this interpretation is Eno’s oblique strategies deck or random word decks.
There's also a version with the reactions from some of the people featured there.
Ok? Do you think they're regularly doing this and account for a meaningful portion of shoplifting or do you think they're basically telling you their story about how one time they broke the law?
so to tell someone a meeting's at 8:45, do you write 1/4:9 because that's how humans say it, or still the non-stupid way?
Can anyone familiar with the law tell us if this will stand? What grounds does the government have to limit access like this?

On an unrelated note, I’m a little surprised how positive people are on this. How many of us spent time online in forums or chat rooms as teens? That can be a very formative experience. Especially for kids who feel like they don’t fit in with the local crowd or feel unaccepted by their parents. I’m too old to get discord, but I can see that internet subculture is going strong there.
I think we're past the point where key players like AWS have _ran with_ the technology Docker provided and did not pay their fair share in the process.

Docker as a company may be a joke, but I don't think the software will be nearly as nice to use without them. I think it's ridiculous that so many asshats are jumping on the hate Docker (the company) bandwagon without understanding how much they have been taken advantage of by the big players who can absolutely support them, but choose not to.

Sometimes I am so disappointed at how much ego still exists in tech. We're supposed to be more educated than the folks who came before us, yet we're doing a worse job.
depending on which extracurricular activities, always some activity that most of people can't effort it, it is a indicator for distinguishing rich.
List of Web Archiving Initiatives
I studied Wittgenstein and the philosophy of AI/Computation for years. I don't see how any of those conclusions in your last paragraph follow from his work. (If anything, Godels incompleteness can be found as a trival result of Wittgenstein's arguments.)
Or Postgres with pgvector

https://github.com/pgvector/pgvector
>People with a good understanding of different styles of art and framing/angles/etc should be able to create the "right" prompts for a customer much much faster and get better results than people who don't know art.

Strong disagree. It's a completely different discipline. One doesn't "know art", they know a specific flavor of it, and 3d modelling is not... sentence constructing.
Yes, balance is important. I guess if the law is passed then enough people agree...
90%+ of the useful interactions I have with other humans working on interesting problems is through Discord these days. If I have an issue with a library, or run into a tough to solve physics problem, basically anything where I might want to talk to someone more knowledgeable or experienced than me the answer is hop on a discord server and ask. It's absolutely asinine to deny this resource to kids.

At least we're teaching kids the basics of computer security by forcing them to circumvent these restrictions, and I have full faith than they will. Most kids are much more technologically literate than someone who would unironically type "groomercord".
I make dishes with duck a few times a year and have done so for decades. When I have looked wherever I have lived I have been able to find it in the frozen specialty meat section of my local grocery store. Quite often rabbit either a full young rabbit or rabbit legs have been right by the duck. Frequently they are from D'ARTAGNAN. Usually it is duck breast and rabbit legs. If you weren't looking for them you would likely walk right passed them and not realize they were duck or rabbit.
> And if that means no startup can possibly compete against the existing players in the industry that have the bandwidth and resources to implement the regulation?

I think starting a tech startup under a VC model is a high-risk, high-reward setup and that your idea should be strong enough to withstand regulations such as this, yeah. There has been a lot of false innovation lately and it has soured my view on the model.

I think it also hurts the incumbents, even though they get a moat of sorts. But only a moat around "tracking teenagers for advertising data".
That doesn’t make sense. Buyers don’t get driven out of the market.
> wonder if that sort of empathy was so plentiful when the automation was shredding the prospects of farmers, miners, truckers and other blue collar workers

Yeah I remember the whole "learn to code" movement that mocked people who were losing their jobs.
The solution is actually simpler than that. Just shut down any company operations in Utah, refuse to accept any payments from users with Utah addresses and require all of your employees that are located in Utah to relocate. But people in Utah can continue using the service.

It's also quite possible that this law gets thrown out as unconstitutional by the federal courts since it seems similar to the California video game censorship law from Brown v. EMA.
the margin of safety is real tight.

https://www.thisamericanlife.org/505/use-only-as-directed
What’s an APM? Bingle are not helping.
Right, it only shows up in the new posts for people logged in, community needs to approve it before people not logged in can see it. Helps keep spam down.
And all of the security is in the physical card manufacturing itself. Uploading a photo of a card is trivial to photoshop and requires no hardware at all.
BugSplat is your go-to toolbox for improving stability, fixing user issues
Not that I'm aware of, but as someone who works in security, I've exploited a bunch of bugs against real world, hard targets both for my own educational purposes and also as part of my job with client engagements. I'm not going to pretend I'm the best in the world, but I'm decent. More importantly, I know a lot of folks with hats of many colors who are a lot better than I am.

When Luca Todesco (the person who wrote that toot) tells you your exploit mitigations are trash, you listen.

Like I said, I'm not going to make any claims to being an elite hacker. I have a cool job that I love, and I enjoy doing this stuff for fun too to keep my skills sharp. But reading through that presentation, there's nothing that made me pause and think "This is a game over scenario." If you have a moderately powerful bug with halfway decent primitives these mitigations aren't really going to stop anyone.

An elite team like NSO group? This isn't going to effect them one bit.
Meant to be, sure.

Ends up being this weird blend of "disturbing kid crack" videos that you really shouldn't leave a child unattended with. The whole "Peppa Pig Drinks Bleach" stuff was only the shallow end of the darkness of the stuff generally tossed in the "Elsagate" category.

There is no "safe" way for a... oh, 2-7 year old, I'll be nice, to use the internet unattended. I've seen an awful lot of it out and about.
Yep you are 100% right. Developers who are not 100% focused on solving customer problems, in customer specified priority order, are in my opinion self-indulgent non-professionals.

Realise that it is not really your employer who pays your salary. Your salary is ultimately paid for by customers. All your employer does is to redirect some of the customer money to you. If the customers stop paying, no salary for you.
And sometimes the legislation is the way it is because the legislature works from an understanding that is easy to popularize... and wrong.
Some even end up going big and steal from banks/investors but that is a bigger no-no. ( FTX, Theranos, WireCard, Frank, WeWork, etc )
> ideas becomes violence when the violence occurs.

But what is violence to you?

Is something only violent when something is resisted? If I tell my taxi driver to give me their money or I will hurt them, and they don't resist me, was there violence? If they say no and I don't do anything to make them was there violence?

Before I invest in writing a longer more thought out response:

At risk of invoking the ghost of Godwin, here is chart showing the journey from words to legal action to extermination of Jewish people in Nazi Germany: https://museeholocauste.ca/app/uploads/2019/03/anti_jewish_l...

I believe Feb 28, 1933 is clearly violence despite it being manipulation of words and speech.

April 7, 1933 is even more clearly violent.

In your opinion, at what point would violent resistance have been justified? Nov 9th, 1938?

It is not violent only when there is resistance. The act of domination is violent regardless of it being resisted or not. When it is resisted it is obviously violent, but if it is not resisted because the cost is too high, domination is still an act of violence.

My perception is that your stance makes an assumption of good faith. In the game of prisoners dilemma, what happens when the other party defects?

> What is the difference? If you condemn pacifism, you are left with violence.

Because violence (defection) is obviously bad, but letting defection (violence) be a winning strategy is worse. (beautiful game to demonstrate this property: https://ncase.me/trust/)

This gets directly back into the original quote about the paradox of tolerance.

The paradox of tolerance is that when you tolerate (cooperate) with those who choose intolerance (defection), you lose.

The social contract of tolerance is that when somebody chooses intolerance (defection) as a strategy, you make sure they lose by not tolerating them (also defecting).
-I stopped using it
-I read detailed blog posts about its new abilities
-I am reading the transformer paper. If I play with it, it will be on my own machine.
-I am worried at the rate of progress. I am worried that the saftey assurances from openai are theater.
-If I worked at openai and thought it would become dangerous and that the saftey work was theater, I would continue to work there because it is futile to try to stop at this point. The best you can do is hang around and hope that you can figure something out down the road, instead of unemploying yourself and having no influence.
- I consider any internet connected thing ai material. A Tesla with over the air updates is a weapon.
Here is a case in Ontario where that argument was used. It did not go well.

https://www.canlii.org/en/on/oncj/doc/2010/2010oncj740/2010o...

The judge quite thoroughly refuted every odd loop hole the defendant tried to claim existed.
> That is a highly Mormon run state that has strong stances on how you should live your life. Even if you are a "goi" (I use the word loosely to illustrate the cultural metaphor in a us v them mentality) to them.

I think you're crossing a line here. You are accusing the Mormons in Utah of having a us-versus-them mentality. But your own comment tries to turn readers against Mormons.

Never forget: The Missouri Executive Order 44, also known as the Mormon Extermination Order, was issued on October 27, 1838, by Governor Lilburn Boggs. The order authorized the expulsion of Mormons from the state and is sometimes referred to as the "Mormon Kill Law". However, the order was rescinded by Governor Christopher S. "Kit" Bond in 1976.

I think we should all be more charitable to Mormons after what they've been through.
>What part of the bill provides them an exception?

For Github? 10(b)(i)(N), to the extent that source code files are “documents”.

For Stack Overflow? 10(b)(i)(J), which was probably written for LinkedIn specifically.
Word was less WYSIWYG before the ribbon. The default "Normal" layout elided a bunch of rendering like headers and footers and could lazily repaginate unlike Print Layout mode which is now the default. "Normal" is now "Draft" mode with a few enhancements. Just use MS Word in Draft and don't use manual formatting.
I’m aware, but it’s in effect very similar.
Dunno exactly but pretty much every country on earth seems to get by without these sort of stories. American politics?
I think you need a video or something or a demo page where people can try it out without any log in. I also think the about page needs to explain takes ideation and composition and lets them work together. It kind of sounds like Scrivener or Manuskript?