skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> There is no way for a human to count for infinite time… so we can only speculate about that case.

We can talk about whether or not a countably infinite sequence S contains a given element x. We iterate through each element s of S one-by-one. If x is contained in S, then eventually we will find an element s such that s = x. But if x is not contained in S, then we will keep iterating for all eternity.

For all countably infinite sets, we can always produce such a sequence, where the iteration will eventually halt if and only if the element is contained in the set. But for the set of real numbers, no matter what sequence we choose, we will never ever find the diagonalized number in our sequence. That's why we call the set of real numbers uncountable.

You dispute that we can't physically count through all of the infinite elements in the real world. But math has no problem talking about what would hypothetically happen if we were to try. It lets us prove ahead of time that certain events will eventually happen if we iterate long enough, and other events will never ever happen.
Agreed.

True journalistic path is not about the truth but about the dispensation of facts in a way that will help the reader make an informed decision pertinent to themselves and its surrounding.

Otherwise, we have "National Enquirers" infestation and all those who are yellow-journaling in their chasing of the last revenue pool.
Particularly, it hinders the migration of pipeline hungry diver populations!
Yeah, but like, the egregiously wrong answers you are likely to get that aren't even close--not to the underlying behavior but even to the way it is commonly used--are apparently so wrong you don't even list them in your list of wrong answers ;P.

Someone who doesn't know how it works but successfully have ever written a move constructor (which is a bit more advanced than merely using one) are going to come up with an answer that I would personally (as not the person who said this... for all I know they also will be super pedantic) claim is "close".

But, I would fully expect the majority of people you ask that question to will, for example, actually claim stuff like that the prior value is completely destroyed... not even merely deconstructed (which is already problematic), but somehow deallocated even if located on the stack, which is way more wrong than merely thinking std::move "takes ownership".

I don't know if you play chess at all, but a book I really enjoyed (and read probably about when I was your age? and the existence of which--honestly more than the specific content--massively informed my teaching style) was The Amateur's Mind, which was a chess master going back and attempting to not as much teach chess from his vantage point to an amateur but to go back and explore the misunderstandings amateurs have about chess by way of interviews with amateurs about games and then trying to work within that mental model. I think that, even though we were all amateurs at one point--or even might have a long way to go still--it can be difficult to really conceptualize the gulf between what an amateur thinks and what you might even assume is the mistake they are making.
A friend recommended https://www.4pcb.com/ for me. I don't have direct experience (yet).
The other detail mentioned in the article is that the Alpha Wolf theory came from studies in Zoos, where unrelated animals were kept together in undersized environments, i.e., a setting that was particularly conductive to induce fights.
For all the crappy stuff insurance does, their medical loss ratio for group insurance is pretty good. The actual problem is that healthcare costs way more in the US than most other countries. Health insurance just ends up getting the blame for that.
> Pet owners really don't like it when wolves kill off their dogs & cats, either.

Right. I have some affection for wolves and coyotes because of their resemblance and relatiom to domestic dogs... but I also don't want them near my home any more than they have to be, and I avoid them at parks, because they will 100% kill and eat dogs like mine. They do it all the time.
https://github.com/AndreRH/hangover

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Wine-Hangover-2023-Open-Source

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Hangover-0.8.3

They were working on ARM and a bit of POWER9 for a while, before it had to be put on hold due to all the PE conversion work and resulting churn in WINE. Now it seems to have been restarted/rewritten.
It would have had to been prescribed in the first place then, no?
We could be discussing it for a lot of time and thinking that this is a moral problem, but in fact is much more simple. This is commercial war

A half Chinese researcher criticizing a Spanish company for killing octopi? feels like a bad joke. Would be like Samsung claiming than using i-phones is immoral and we all should boycott it. There are more than hints of a conflict of interest here.

Spain invested more than a decade of research into learning how to breed octopuses. Most of it, failure after failure. The fact is that China is the main competitor in this market and would be --extremely happy-- to have this technology today, and exploit the market at much bigger scale. A solid clue is that this is published in "business insider" and not in "the friends of Kant".

Calling to boycott against competitors, while you earn some extra time to clone, copy, or develop the same techniques is a classic foul move, and the really immoral part here.
Well said but another statement is missing :

Move to a new house near wild fauna and flora ? You’re an asshole, leave it the fuck alone.

Expending suburbs and creating new one is taking over some life territory.
> A 475-km-long dam between the north of Scotland and the west of Norway and another one of 160 km between the west point of France and the southwest of England could protect more than 25 million Europeans against the consequences of an expected sea level rise of several metres over the next few centuries

“Ah, sure fuck Ireland (and the west coast of the UK) anyway”
> I get that they needed to exclude an obvious potential cause and couldn't trust the patient to give an honest answer

I disagree with this resigned acceptance to medical paternalism. The basic situation is that you are the patient, and all care should be per your direction. The doctors' responsibility is to treat you based on what you've told them. If you're actually lying, the responsibility for misdiagnosis rests entirely on you.

Doctors hedging against a patient lying should only ever be considered within this larger backdrop. For example independent of the nonconsensual sample and testing, it was severely unethical for them to have delayed your care by several days while indulging their own curiosity.
> OpenAI is actively blocking the scraping use case.

How? And since when? Scraping is identical to retrieval except in terms of what you do with the data after you have it, and to differentiate them when you are using the API, OpenAI would need to analyze the code calling the API, which doesn’t seem likely.
If I’m a hog farmer and I can make 200 smeckles for a standard hog or get paid 400 smeckles for each “feral hog” I hand over then logically I’ll just start breeding the feral ones instead.

The market finds the most profitable solution, not necessarily the best solution.
Man that 16 inch laptop looks so cool!
If engineers are making the hiring decisions, as was the trend for a while, and they make bad hiring decisions. Or if the hiring department is bad. Or if managers are good at managing but bad at hiring. Lots of ways, hiring is hard.
It's a glorified web client with lots of stuff built around it. The original structure is a Ruby on Rails app, nowadays the frontend is being rebuilt in React. I understand the challenge with searching this info, a quick Google search doesn't yield good results.
Move Over, AD936x: An Innovative Software Defined Radio Architecture
Satya Nadella even refers this in his book "Hit Refresh", and it seems like he has change the company structure to avoid this problem better than before.
You’re avoiding the difference. You can count (for example via generator function), the natural numbers, though you may never finish. Typically, people generate via numerical order, so 1, 2, 3, 4,…

Now try doing that with the real numbers. You explicitly said you can sort them after. So, tell me, what comes immediately after 1, so I can attempt to convince you that it does not.

In other words, that the real numbers only have local sorting, not global sorting, whereas the natural numbers have both.
But by covering Congressional proceedings in that way, they ignore the way laws are actually made.

If you watch only C-SPAN you might think that laws are enacted by Congress after some debate or deliberation on camera about the content of those laws.

But that's not how it works. The way it works is that members of Congress spend a huge amount of time, sometimes the majority of their time, soliciting donations. And then a lobbyist for a company that has donated money to a member of Congress will give them the exact text of a law that they want enacted. The member of Congress will get that into a bill that makes it through committee, possibly by trading votes. Then the bill will come up to a vote, no one will have read the whole bill they are voting on, in some cases that would be impossible, the bill will be hundreds of pages long and it is only given to the members of Congress a few hours before the vote.

Then they vote on the bill that lobbyists wrote without any idea what is in it.

Is that what they show on C-SPAN? If not, why not?

Because someone made a very non-neutral decision that that is what they will show on C-SPAN.
This rate is pretty ridiculous. I wouldn't be surprised if there is automated software or a farm of non-medical staff working behind the name of the doctor, similar to how shady contractors will "rent" the license of a legitimate but retired contractor.
Just stating the obvious here
> LangaugeTool

Out of curiosity, I went to the page of the tool and input the comment contents, which correctly caught the mistake, although tools typically miss various compound names in my experience, due to their dictionaries being limited: https://languagetool.org/

For example, I proofread my own blog posts by using the built in LibreOffice spellcheck (offline dictionary) and that has actually been useful in catching a typo or two in most of my writing. Personally, I probably wouldn't use a browser plugin due to concerns over data privacy and not caring much beyond the browser's built in spellcheck, but I personally support the overall spellchecking suggestion, as long as the tone is positive!

For some folks, the style and punctation suggestions in some of the tools out there might also be useful.
So then what is the point of using the label the way the OP did?
MVC Xerox PARC 1978-79
> Think about counting as three operations:
> 1. Produce a number 2. Add it to the set of numbers I’m counting 3. Sort the numbers

Missing in your definition is the operation has to produce all numbers that you are counting over.

If you are counting something, you don't leave out elements.
IT Craftsman – what it is and what it isn't
I've seen similar research that shows the converse, as well: wolves are more likely than dogs to learn how to solve puzzles by watching other canines work the puzzles.

It was in some dog documentary on Netflix. Wish I could remember the name!

Anyway I think that tendency to attune to us, generalized to other contexts, is part of what makes dogs so wonderful. It's not just a matter of being able to direct them explicitly, but the fact that they're interested in what we're doing, how we're feeling, what we want, etc.

All of that varies with each individual dog, of course. But it's obvious that generally, wolves and humans aren't as fit for each other as dogs and humans are.
£320 on Amazon does not seem to fall into affordable to me compared to a RPi 4
> For example if they tell you they do 0.5mm vias and you ask for 0.4mm vias and they ship you 0.5mm vias... who's in the wrong?

If you’re ordering the $2 special from JLC and they deliver a board that meets their specifications, you can’t really complain.

Now if this was a $500 board house making random changes without communication, I’d be upset.

At ultra-low price points, you take what’s offered and don’t expect any hand holding along the way.
> But I can ask ChatGPT that same question, and get a correction in my understanding without the loss of those sweet, sweet internet points.

How do you ever know when the correction it makes is wrong?
Counterexample: https://mobile.twitter.com/random_walker/status/163692305837...
They have to give the peons some hope so they keep buying stuff and flying and driving so capitalism can keep on capitalizing.
Know any more details? This seems rather promising.
And blatantly copy your state's insurance regulatory department. Insurers LOVE that.
I wouldn't even go so far as to say it's either the theorists or experimentalists fault. The problem might just be that it becomes physically impractical to the point of practical impossibility to observe the nature of things beyond a certain scale to us. And that's just, you know, the nature of things.
Yeah I've tried to parse it for Japanese and even there it's so inconsistent (human-written) that the effort required is crazy.
I mean do we care about the ecology now?
The USA medical insurance system is missing a "stick" for such bogus rejections. Unduly denying a claim should result in a fine big enough to be felt in the company balance sheet, that is the only way to change companies' behaviours.

, missing some kind of harsh
The Danish and Swedish part is never gonna happen at least. Blocking off the Baltic sea doesn’t make any sense, and in Denmark we don’t need this for most of the stretch of the west coast of Jutland.

I guess blocking the sea access to Hamburg is also a no thanks for Germany.
GPT basically reads the text you have input, and generates a set of 'likely' next words (technically 'tokens').

So for example, the input:

Bears like to eat ________

GPT may effectively respond with Honey (33% likelihood that honey is the word that follows the statement) and Humans (30% likelihood that humans is the word that follows this statement). GPT is just estimating what word follows next in the sequence based on all it's training data.

With temperature = 0, GPT will always choose "Honey" in the above example.

With temperature != 0, GPT will add some randomness and would occasionally say "Bears like to eat Humans" in the above example.

Strangely a bit of randomness seems to be like adding salt to dinner - just a little bit makes the output taste better for some reason.
you should try it in real life and tell us how it goes.
I never said I found anything inherently wrong with it, I just observed a difference between myself and others. I imagine you'd be cutting a lot of people out of your life over something so innocuous.
No doubt there are many cases of exactly that.

And articulation is of rather arbitrary value. I wouldn't put it on a pedestal.
you can make a personal backup, but once you hand it to someone else it is no longer personal
My heal isn't shaped like everyone else's I think, so many nice shoes cut into my tendon so badly, I have to try every one to make sure I can walk without sharp pain.

In college I bought a pair of Doc Martens and just about crippled myself before just giving up and taking a hammer to them. (Yes, literally.) After beating the crap out of the back of them I was finally able to use them without blood being shed. Not something you can do to most shoes though.
I've my doubts about Arm's future with the reports of intending to up the price of licensing. That strategy seems insane with the Risc-v progress and increased uptake by big tech companies.
https://bonkersworld.net/organizational-charts-update
Unfortunately with the way ROCm is developed, and how its only intended for specific GPUs, I doubt it.
https://support-en.wd.com/app/answers/detailweb/a_id/50208/~...
Meat is delicious and nutritious. I have no desire to move to a vitamin powder and soy extract based diet.
Free Market, Self-Regulation, Share-Holder Value.

My Friends, The Revolution is near. There comes a time when the common man can no longer stand idly by and watch as their brothers and sisters (and themselves) continue to be screwed over.

There are many amongst you that fear speaking out in the vain hope that some day that they will get their share of 'the Good Life'. I regret to inform you that if it was going to happen, it would have happened to you by now.

Don't remain silent nor inactive in fear of rocking the boat, the 'they' are mocking you and holding out a carrot on a stick while you blindly plod on in the hope of 'some day'.

Do what you can, when you can. Even the smallest ant can overcome an elephant.

Do not be discouraged nor disheartened if you feel there is nothing you can do. That is what the 'they' count on.

Enough of this Shit!
How many dimensions are there and do creatures exist in other dimensions?
When your boss asks you to take a ticket, when a parent asks their son to clean their room, when a cop asks a citizen to identify themselves, you don't think those situations imply control? When a romantic partner asks you to change the drugs you are taking, don't you think there is some implication that their satisfaction with the relationship is contingent on it? Maybe we are getting too into the semantics here but I think it's pretty overbearing to make such a request and position it as anything more than a suggestion.
Wonder if there is a way to "show problem A is like problem B, therefore it is NP complete," but for the possibility space of literally the entire English language.
I don't think this is about telling your titles to others but adjusting your self identification to align with your aspired values.

It helps you be consistent.

For example, at some point I went from "guy who happens to do yoga" to a "yoga guy." At that time, what would I do when landing in a new city? Look up a yoga studio. Because I was a yoga guy. A guy who happens to do yoga wouldn't necessarily do it.

It's not about asserting who you are to others it's about facilitating your own decisions to be what you want. "a guy who's trying to be more active" may still eat a whole cheesecake. An "athlete" would not.
I'll even take a text hover message. Every time the black bar is shown there are multiple questions about why its there. Seems like an easy problem to solve.
"Name washing"? Is there such term/phrase?

I stopped watching a show on PBS once the API (American Petroleum Institute) began sponsoring it.
No, as far as I can quickly find this proposal is propagated by a single (electrical) engineer, and does not have backing from any NGO's, governments or political parties.
Renewable energy is being deployed at a fast clip around the globe — especially solar and especially in China. That’s the story behind new capacity figures from IRENA, the International Renewable Energy Agency.
What’s the withdrawal like coming off lemon poppy seed muffins? Poor kids.
Open-Source GPT-4 Platform for Markdown
Something similar exists: bondenoshoes.com
Musical education absolutely, which in the days before recorded music was a relatively widespread and practical undertaking. I assume that private tutoring in classical subjects for upper class women was, if not the norm, probably not rare. And we do know of some examples like Ada Lovelace.

>they were a men's club for a shockingly long time

But, yeah. A lot of elite universities had a rather small percentage of women well into the latter half of the 20th century. Those that have larger numbers was often because there were sister female schools like Harvard and Radcliffe Colleges. Dartmouth College didn't start admitting women until the 1970s.
> a perfectly plausible alternative interpretation, which is that he knows what's best for his girlfriends better than they do for themselves.

We are literally commenting on the article confirming using hormonal contraceptives increases the risk of cancer. So if your partner is using these you basically have two options: 1) ignore the issue and maybe not even mention it to her as this could be misinterpreted as influencing her decision, 2) address it out of pure concern for her future, even years ahead when you're no longer together.
„Coded“ is relatively easy. How about maintaining a project for a decade?
You set up a straw man and berated it about a bunch of things I didn’t say, just so you know.

Can you find a quote you disagree with, and then explain why you disagree with it? That usually clarifies situations like this.

For example, the “when cared for” is an important qualifier in my statement.
... Is the human behaviour you're talking about being lead by the oldest available person? That's how wolves work.

Like, when someone describes themselves as "an alpha", they're generally, well, beyond showing themselves to be somebody to be ignored, also not claiming to be the oldest.
You can use surface-mount-to-DIP breakout boards. They add a buck or two per part, but that's generally OK for prototyping.
> multiple probiotics.

I get overwhelmed when researching probiotics and end up with buyers dillema. Which ones did you find helpful?
Let's incentivize taking your kid to the library, and reading to them. It all starts there.
I asked AI for the opening scene of the first book:

EXT. SMALL TOWN - DAY

The camera pans over a quiet and peaceful small town, surrounded by fields of crops and rolling hills. The sun beats down on the empty streets and storefronts.

We hear a distant voice calling out from the outskirts of the town. It grows louder as the camera zooms in on two young boys, Ears and Len, who are playing in a field. Ears is hunched over, trying to listen to the sound of the voice.

EARS
(calling out)
Who's there?

The voice grows closer and we see that it belongs to a man dressed in strange clothing, with a strange device strapped to his back. The man approaches the boys with a friendly smile.

MAN
Hello there, boys. I'm looking for a place to stay. Can you help me?

LEN
(looking skeptical)
What kind of place are you looking for?

MAN
(smiling)
Anywhere that's warm and dry. I've been traveling for a long time and I'm tired of sleeping on the ground.

EARS
We have a guest room at our house. You can stay with us.

The man's face lights up with gratitude.

MAN
Thank you, boys. That's very kind of you. My name is John Thurston. What are your names?

EARS
I'm Ears and he's Len.

The man follows the boys as they lead him to their home on the outskirts of town.

As they walk, we see that the man's strange device is a Geiger counter, used to measure radiation levels. We also see that the town is surrounded by a high fence, with guards posted at the entrance.

This is a world that has been devastated by nuclear war, and the town is one of the few remaining communities struggling to survive in a new and dangerous world.
There's also
https://dirtypcbs.com/store/pcbs
ProPublica has been known to twist facts. They are not the final word in this.
Insurance companies would absolutely classify each specific test done on a specimen as a medical procedure. Each one costs money.
I was wondering why The LA Times would publish a story that seems intent on somehow linking 1970s threats of violence with the recent SVB issue. It was only after reading the article did I see the author has a book coming out on a "tech backlash".

Of course there are complaints against tech companies and of course it comes from left, right and center. That's because tech is now woven into our personal and corporate lives.

But suggesting any large numbers of persons advocating violence seems a real reach and could be seen by many as plain irresponsible.
Yeah goes for most ports of countries around the Baltic Sea.
Titles make all the diff - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Tr...