skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Being post-menopause is almost 100%, not quite 100%.

https://healthnews.com/womens-health/menopause/can-you-get-p...

> Generally speaking, postmenopausal pregnancy is unlikely, although not entirely impossible. HRT will not trigger the ovaries to produce new eggs. If a woman has remaining eggs after menopause, HRT might trigger the release of an egg. There are few reports of postmenopausal women conceiving naturally, but this is very rare.
I haven't heard of Dokku until now but yunohost does have SSO. However, it's up to the packagers to actually configure the SSO to be used in the applications by default, and some applications are just inherently not built with SSO support to begin with, so it's hit or miss on a per-app basis. It is nice for the apps it works with though.
Had a good laugh, great job! :)
They don't watch Mythbusters? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIN7cq8Mc-4
Or Seinfield? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYzuQr7YVYg
> finding a linear negative relationship between lead levels in children and IQ was the smoking gun to prove that lead was harmful.

Lead toxicity was identified more than 2000 years before the first IQ test, and was rather extensively studied during the Renaissance. The combination of blood lead and IQ tests was important in quantifying the existence and impacts of particular kinds and levels of environmental exposure that had been assumed to be forms of levels that would not be hazardous, but it was not important to identifying lead as a toxin.
It cares about results

It's impossible to reason about, much less implement, fixes and features
when the existing structure is special-case-ridden and incomprehensible.
We shouldn't confuse killing an animal for research, and killing it for human food.

We don't embalm cows before eating them. Killing your seafood with ethanol, and therefore making it poisonous, would be extremely dumb.
That falls under implied consent. In the case where youre unable to give consent, medical providers are given license to provide care that would be considered reasonable and necessary given your condition. Once you are conscious you can withdraw consent for treatment at any time.

A secret drug test on a conscious person who is not showing symptoms of intoxication is pretty far outside of the limits of implied consent.
Less than 10s/claim is actually an upper bound, since chances are there's meetings, coffee breaks, and other overhead.
Are you sure? I know they have a good chunk. I could not remember my address for my Area51 site that turned into a Heroes of Might and Magic dial up tournament. It might be there.

What was your site?
> I'm pretty sure there are hosting services who can just take your site offline if you exceed your bandwidth quota

Having my website instant-killable "for fun" by any bored script kiddy living in a country thousands of km away from me is not a particularly interesting proposition.
I'm a PhD student and we currently have a DL server at my lab that I manage. Looking for a way to administer loads and environments to create reproducible models for undergraduate students and other researchers I arrived to determined.ai. It felt interesting to share with the HN crowd.
IMO compilers are a bit like kernel development in that the real learning was the friends you made along the way, rather than actually being able to understand how a compiler works, which is a nice side effect. For example, when you write an OS you learn a lot about how code interfaces with hardware. A compiler is many people's first and only introduction to soundness and formal analysis. Being able to put on the hat of a compiler author can be useful in many fields that have nothing to with compiler development, and that's even if you go beyond "I just want to see what my code is being transformed into".
Access to Private repos (full code)?

No.
Is being a separatist something bad?

For example imagine you are part of the USSR, but not Russia, instead you are in Latvia. Not wanting to be part of USSR, makes you are a separatist. Is there something bad in it?
The copyright system, just like the patent system, is based on a recognition that if anyone can trivially copy something you make, there is less point in working hard on it for a long time, because you won’t be able to benefit from your labor (and perhaps won’t even be able to support yourself).

Unlike working on something physical (say, a bushel of grain, a shirt, a bookshelf, or a house), when the work is an idea (like a better mousetrap or a catchy song) if someone copies it they can profit from your labor at your expense because they pay none of costs of creation, so can undercut and outcompete you.

Therefore, the thinking goes, creators won’t bother making new intangible creations like textbooks or paintings or inventions if they can’t have some kind of exclusive right over publication or use. (I’m not quite sure what empirical evidence there is for this claim. That seems like an interesting question, but it’s probably pretty tricky to investigate.)

The goal of the copyright and patent system is to encourage creators by granting them limited-time exclusive rights, whereby they can benefit from their hard work. Those creators then do useful work they otherwise would not bother with, and the public benefits.

But the premise is not an abstract ideal of fairness or a guarantee of moral rights for authors and creators. The premise is promotion of science and useful arts. At the point where the copyright term is interfering with (rather than promoting) science and useful arts, it is too long. That is, the fundamental question should be “does this system most benefit the public?” not “is this system the fairest to authors?”

I’ve never met a creator who decided what or whether to create based on their descendants' earning money from exclusive rights to their work 50+ years into the future. Maybe such creators exist, but I would guess those to be vanishingly few.
So you should be fully supportive of Coinbase and other crypto companies asking the SEC to show their work and publish an official statement with supporting evidence of why they believe Howey applies.

If the SEC wants to regulate a currency (currently the domain of the CFTC and OCC) they either need to explain why they believe money is a security or have the Congress explicitly grant them the authority.

The USDA for example can't all of the sudden decide they want to regulate forests because an edible plant might grow there.
That's works until the prosecution is asking the jury to consider why you refused a subsequent opiate hair test.
I think it shouldn't be indiscriminate, but I don't see any issue with letting it have up to date sources on Wikipedia and GitHub for instance. It's nice that I can ask it some questions about random open source projects but the info it has is 2 years out of date.
Author learns that you can force people to do things they don't want to do by giving them titles and a sense of responsibility.
In this case the guardian is either the person who brought you in or the hospital itself.
Yep, that's also very frustrating. And if I wanted results in Japanese I'd type in Japanese, so it's not particularly hard for them to guess intent here.
It can talk with our customers and write our press releases!
Writing code is "easier" than most other things, especially driving, because you get unlimited do-overs (up to practical limits). If the code doesn't compile, tweak it and try again. If the car doesn't stop for a pedestrian... uh oh!
Elon Musk was like the old man in 1980s horror movies warning anyone who’d listen that it’s not safe to go any further and everyone just sort of ignored it and laughed it off.

Now we’re close to the part where some of our friends begin to go missing.
In my personal experience? No. I asked for 15%, knowing my co-workers made more than that, and inflation had been 9.1% YoY. I was told to be happy to get 3%.

What did I do? Found a different job and employer. Jobs are like insurance rates: you should shop around occasionally. For businesses it's a cost of doing business when trying to compete to lure new workers.
This is the major "magic wow factor" behind GPT. It has a basic level of knowledge in every topic which is enough to convince an average human that the AI produced a good result If-And-Only-If the human is unskilled in that topic.
I don't understand how any of that is related to why "react new" is not a thing.
> The "free market" has never existed and never will

The free market has existed in the US since its inception, excluding the slave south.

> Capitalism brought us children working in mines 6 days a week, company towns, and extreme poverty world wide

Free markets brought the world out of poverty. Perhaps you thought medieval children did not work?

> lifted billions out of poverty with governmental spending on health and safety

In the US that all happened before government spending on that. The US poverty rate is the same it was in 1968, the inception of the Great Society programs. It had been steadily declining before then.

> I don't know how/where you made up 150 million people starving

Communist countries. More to the point, every organization that has tried collective farms has failed to feed itself.
Every single girlfriend I had, I asked her to get off contraceptives because of the medical dangers and I didn't want to be responsible for any problems associated with it. Instead I took responsibility for making sure she wouldn't get pregnant. One of my girlfriends actually got mad at me because I was *too* careful about getting her pregnant, and interpreted that as me not wanting to get married to her (which since we're not together ended up being true I guess).

This doesn't work for everyone but I'm fairly responsible, and no accidental pregnancies, so it worked for everyone I was with. The same way went for my wife as well, and we have 2 kids now, with no accidentals ones. I'm going to teach my son this as well, that the responsibility is on both parties but as the man you need to control what you can control and don't leave things to chance, especially something as life changing/destroying as an accidental pregnancy.
> It's unethical and perhaps illegal in some places, but they are able.

Able does not always refer to physical ability. It can refer to legal ability.
Also sounds like a phi violation.
The terminology morphed to p people (alpha males) despite absolutely no indication that it applies to wolves or humans (except prisons). That’s the myth.
I am not sure whether you were agreeing with me or refuting, but the article you linked vindicates my stand -- you may die trying and not get a hit.
>The day after Kate learned that she was suspected of using opioids—five days after she gave birth—the hospital "refused to discharge" her, the complaint says.

That was unlawful detention, by the way. By fraud, under false color of authority, and/or by force. They have no authority to hold anybody against their will (with very specific exceptions having to do with mental state and not applicable here).

> She was finally released that evening, but her baby did not come home until October 1, "ten days after her birth and five days after DCPP cleared Kate to bring her baby home."

That was kidnapping, by the way.

We're talking about actual felonies here. Not that you can get prosecutors interested in that kind of crime, but it's still true.
This is more of an engineering question than a physics one I think.

GPU dies are quite large compared to CPU, ballpark 2X to 3X, so I guess we could get a generation to generation and a half of transistor doubling out of increasing the size of the chips at least.

But the question is, do workloads benefit from all these transistors? Server workloads, I guess so, you can get some pretty big Xeons, or lots of transistors per package with AMD and multi-chip packaging. Consumer workloads, I think the issue is more that consumers don’t have these massively parallel workloads that servers and workstations have. Consumers have stated their preference by not paying for more than a handful of cores per chip.

The obvious way to get more transistors per core is fewer, bigger cores per chip. But changing the cores is a big engineering project. And yield issues are already a big problem, which would only become worse with more complex circuits. But until we end up with one core per chip, I think we have hit an engineering/economics problem rather than a physics one.

And the engineering/economics problem is a really big one, I mean AMD has had great success by going in the opposite direction; breaking things up further with multi-chip packages.
If a security inherently can't be regulated, then it can't be traded. Them's the brakes.
If there is a magical way to gauge character in a short amount of time then sure, however I doubt most people will do any better than a coin flip when asked to predict the "character" of someone without having known the person deeply.
> And it never makes sense beсause few to no people believe in or care about "alpha wolves".

The last fifty or so years of western literature beg to differ.
Lots of people feel burned out. But what is burnout exactly?
They are not following the law.

The law declares a specific threshold concentration level, and they are using a level 1/200th of that. They absolutely should suffer severe recompense and punative damages for doing that.

Laws should not allow discretion. That is how you get abuse and discrimination through selective enforcement. If a law would be intolerable and inhumane with 100% enforcement, then that is how you know it shouldn't exist in the first place, and is in fact still intolerable and inhumane even with discretion and selective enforcement.

In this case, the law doesn't in fact exist, and no selective enforcement is needed. The law already does not say that eating poppy seeds is illegal, because that doesn't approach the level to trigger the law.
Definitely available in the states.

I had to do a USA federally mandated drug test for a license once and one of the questions they ask before administering is if you have had poppy seeds recently.
this comment started out as a reasonable critique of congressional behaviour, then transitioned into something much murkier

a good argument to support a bad one

yes, congress may well be capricious and incompetent, but that doesn’t make tiktok any less of a colossal security threat, which it appears you’re trying to indicate
>The minimum IQ required to graduate college (and even some masters degrees) with decent grades can’t be much more than 100 at this point, but was certainly more like 115 or even 120 in the 1950s.

IQ is in practice affected by education (to a small extent and mostly in early childhood), but the whole point of it as a concept was to avoid measuring education. So I don't think it follows that higher IQ = more educated.
Part of Docker's issue was the executed it absolutely horribly. They gave a short suspense, very little detail, and few options for migrating under such a deadline.
I believe this was a feature of the techno-apocalypse in Oryx and Crake by our very own Margaret Atwood
For anyone who is against government regulation... this is another perfect example of the kind of perverse financial incentives unregulated capitalism results in.

Blanket denial without consideration lowers your costs as an insurance provider, because it acts like a filter on people who care enough to appeal repeatedly.
> If the SEC wants to regulate a currency (currently the domain of the CFTC and OCC) they either need to explain why they believe money is a security

Factually, they don't. They just have to issue the regulations and enforce them, and if people, disagree, then they have to explain their rationale in the ensuing litigation.

Just as Congress doesn't need to explain their Constitutional authority when passing a law, either.
A wise man I know once said that the difference between man and animal is that while some animals like apes CAN be indoctrinated (the banana experiment) humans WANT to be indoctrinated.
Revoke the medical licenses of the doctors who rubber stamp the denials.
In short: don't talk about it, be about it.
The GP's citation of Visa and Mastercard are cherry-picking? What companies would be more relevant?
> Assessing a tax doesn't actually clean the air

Unless you use that tax to pay someone to clean the air?
The other day I was having ChatGPT write some code for me and it started referencing objects and properties that didnt exist. I wish I tried correcting it. That would have been interesting.
I wasn't talking about coding jobs. Even jobs in marketing or program management go to STEM students from "lesser" schools. I don't even look at sociology or language degrees anymore.
ChatGPT will revolutionize the economy. We need to decide what that looks like
It seems like the title is incorrect:

> GPT-4 identifies SVB’s biggest risk & gives good advice using 2021 balance sheet

From the article GPT-4 gave the likelihood of a bank run as a 1 out of 5. Yes, SVB, made some bad bets, but even with those bad bets they could have continued operating just fine. The thing that actually killed SVB was the $42 billion being withdrawn in a single day out of the $190B in total deposits.

The bad bets were the catalyst that triggered the bank run, but they were not the root cause. The root cause was SVB caters to a specific market segment, venture backed startups, that exhibit herd like behavior. All it takes is a few VCs telling their portfolio companies to move their money out of SVB and suddenly 22% of all deposits are withdrawn. I suspect few banks could survive a similar bank run. None of this is mentioned by GPT-4.
You're forgetting who the audience is. The audience is Harvard admissions staff. That changes the nature of the joke quite a bit in my opinion. Since it is an inside joke for only Harvard's people and their ideologically-aligned "regulators," it reads to me as more of an acknowledgement and acceptance of the practice of anit-asian discrimination, and at most a suggestion that they tone it down a bit.

If this were a parody written for the daily show (for example) or something else intended for a wide audience, it would absolutely have been criticism of Harvard, but the audience really does change the joke.

Personally, I think this is one of the more racist things that I have seen recently, and large swathes of both Harvard's admissions staff and the folks "investigating" them need to resign.
I thought the "alpha male" idea, as applied to humans, was an analogy to the concept of alpha wolves (as opposed to dominance hierarchies in non-human primates). You always hear about the pack leader, or the lone wolf, never the alpha macaque, right?

So, dispelling that myth in wolves may be an attempt to shake off the pseudoscientific idea that this concept can be used to describe human social structures.

Of course, not being based in science in the first place, a scientific appeal has no chance of changing anything. Which is why it gets rewritten every few years.
Perhaps someone could try other variations of the experiment as suggested above and by many here.
Except that GPT can and does produce good results even to experts, just not all the time. So your claim of "IFF" is unnecessary hyperbolic contrarianism
> yes but it also removed the need to use Linux

And is it a problem for user? Or anyhow a bad thing? Why not advocate for FreeBSD for example?
In the US system, do you get to pay for the pleasure of having a test you don’t want?
No.

I think time is finite and I think the act of spending time writing uncritical pieces on zelensky is a choice about how to spend the finite time. I think making that choice is an act of prioritization.

I think zelensky's puff pieces are propaganda, the same way I think putin as the head of a giant propaganda machine.

I think spending time un-puffing zelensky is a choice and I think that choice can be measured by its opportunity cost.

Zelensky puff pieces aren't even a tenth of the evil that putin's puff pieces are. Why is it a priority to spend time debunking Zelensky's puff?

There are a million stories that could be written. Choosing to write an anti-propaganda pieces is prioritizing the outcome of doing so over spending time writing about mistreatment of pows, and writing about the mistreatment of pows is at the cost of an infinite number of other potential stories. Each story has an outcome. Each story is a finger on the scale of public opinion.

So what does the way a news service prioritizes their stories say about the news service?
The creators of these large language models (LLMs) are akin to our modern-day Einsteins and Teslas. They've harnessed the power of AI to produce truly transformative and seemingly magical advancements in technology!

Nobel prizes and MacArthur Fellowships are in order.
Let’s Stop Calling Taiwan a Digital Democracy (and Tell Better Digital Stories)
Lots of great quotes like:

"Inference will be the way software is operated in the future. Inference is simply a piece of software that was written by a computer instead of a piece of software that was written by a human and every computer will just run inference someday."
I won't answer the question directly, but I will say that it is possible and that you shouldn't try:

many people have died while doing this, because the seeds carry an unknown and highly variable amount of poppy latex. One may use some amount and feel nothing, but later use the same amount with a different batch of seeds and rapidly OD (usually fatal for opioid naive people).

This is especially a problem due to the potentially long delay of come-up, which is why many folks die after redosing (believing that the first dose did nothing or wasn't sufficient).

Lastly, baked goods containing poppy seeds do not pose any danger, as high heat destroys basically all the alkaloids.
Open source licenses that restrict using the code in the model training
Why licenses which are open source but restricts the code being used for model training or requiring the model to be also open source are not being used?

My concern is that those who train the model like GPT-4 take the open source codes but do not provide an equitable share of the wealth created to those who had contributed to the training dataset. If they make the model publicly available like the training dataset is public, it’s not a problem.

I may sound pessimistic but without equitable sharing, in a few years, the AI powers can get concentrated in a very small group of people’s hands.
It can operate at almost any level of abstraction.

So zoom out even further, to the intersection of macroeconomics and geopolitics.

Describe the big things that are happening in the world right now, from the banking crisis, to the inability to raise the debt ceiling, to social and political unrest, to disinformation campaigns promoted by crypto shills, to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Ask it to examine the relationships among multiple events in different domains interacting with each other.

Ask it to help with scenario planning by identifying multiple possible scenarios given that fact pattern.

Interesting and sobering results --> https://imgur.com/a/fL4CpkQ
How Civic Tech Got a Pandemic Upgrade
> The meat is great - leaner than pork and gamey, but it's also expensive - 2-4x more than pork.

Is it actually wild boar?

We have butchers and farms selling “wild boar” products in Canada, but it’s actually farmed from descendants of recent “adoptions” of wild specimens.

It’s wild in terms of genetics; which might still be better; but isn’t accomplishing much in terms of culling.
That's a bizarre standard to judge an animal by. Do you think bears and moose, or wolves not habituated to humans, are less "wonderful" because you can't cuddle with them?
It's worked well for them in the past.

Office on Mac. Boom, they can make plenty of money from a 'competitor'.
Have you ever actually had this problem? I haven't in 20 years of hosting a site.
And drug manufacturers spend a lot of money to nerf their medications to make them harder to inject. Not all customers are good customers.