skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It may be helpful to assume good faith. I think the GP is making the point that if this guy who is "a student" chose that diagram as his architecture for a hobby / learning project, then it's worrying that somewhere along the way we may have inadvertently created the expectation on newbies that this is The Way™

Said differently, it's worrying that people decide to overengineer architectures like that before there's any real need. It's a sysops version of the early optimization problem.

Ten years ago, the student would have probably built something much simpler with a couple cron jobs on a simple EC2 instance, maybe celery/rabbitmq as a message queue if he was feeling fancy and called it a day
Do they allow sellers to reuse an ASIN? If not, seems like they could not allow sellers to change the ASIN associated with a product page.
I am treating my employment like a corporation would. Risks I do not pay for and do not benefit from mitigating are waste that could allow me to transfer time back to my own priorities, increasing my personal "profit."
Thanks for sharing!

The main limitation of the Yubikey is that the firmware is closed source and potentially even backdoored. Otherwise the construction and features of Yubikey are pretty good.
The thing I like most about Amazon is its dedication to customers. This is a very long awaited feature and Amazon has delivered it. Amazon could have let users buy from its marketplace and make profit. Instead Amazon has made the right call and decided to protect its customers.
Protip: if customer service phone lines are busy due to some stuff going on, call the English line of some smaller country.
A non-federated decentralized social protocol based on Git
Why would you convert an identifier to ascii as if it were hex? And it seems unlikely that (eg) paypal would do so?

But, sure, it's just one idea. You can add more layers to make it even less likely something will seem problematic to someone somewhere; a 100% guarantee seems impossible, especially if you are going to allow things like above "What if we brainstorm for a way this could be a puzzle where the answer is a problematic word to someone". No "scanner" will even possibly catch every possible thing in that domain, no matter how unlikely.
Same except I wasn't even sending money. Made an account years ago, never used it, got banned for life when I logged back in. Tried making a new account, but obviously they're able to detect that, so it wouldn't take any of my credit cards.

I don't get how people use this thing.
The guarantee is that the USD will _not_ hold its value. And if you don't trade your natural resources in USD, the other guarantee is that your country will get bombed.
>Not enough people enjoy seaweed as a food because it's just not appetizing.

Can we just agree that there are cultural differences in taste?

Hundreds of millions if not billions of people find seaweed quite appetizing. Such a normative statement is flat out wrong.
That's that idea out the window then! They should open up to international students, I reckon they'd clean up, the only real competitor in the UK would be the Open University and WGU has significant cost and time savings over it.
Quicker serverless Postgres connections
You can use the term to mean whatever you want but in my mind it means it's boring with no particular room for improvement. Even the biggest booster isn't going to say that about this AI. And keep in mind, "write me a limerick" is a pretty easy prompt. We're not trying to do anything too novel or crazy there.
We've been using GDrive in one form or another since 2014 when they released Google Drive for Work. Primary use case nowadays for my team is an old legacy tool(been in place since 2014) that connects to our ERP and other internal tools to generate reports and export data with combined metadata from multiple tools/sources. Then if needed, makes a copy to different share drives and teams, assigns access rights for internal and external users. We have custom web front ends that allow them to interact with these exports along with fat clients if they need to manipulate a larger dataset of files.

My last check had the service account that I'm responsible for somewhere around 8.7 Million files with an average size around 9.2MB.

We have multiple of these "accounts", with similar use-cases across other teams. This is excluding the normal use of Gdrive with normal "rank-and-file" office works managing standard office docs.

We've felt the squeeze from google over the past few years, so we've already started migrating off of google services about 2.5 years into a 4 year project.
Preventing sellers from changing the UPC code would be trivial, and would tie in with other existing controls.
> But you don't have to, because the blast radius is so much smaller, and the incentives are aligned better.

Entire countries best case is a small blast radius? A small CA going rogue would have a much smaller one, when we're talking about best case. Worst case is massive either way (say LetsEncrypt and .com). People also buy a lot of domains ignoring the fact that they're ccTLDs. The mere implication that people should choose their domains considering this fact is terrible.

> The reason why CAs require such extreme punishment for misbehaviour is that one bad CA can break the trust for every site on the web.

They can, but it'll be discovered really quick, especially with CAA violations. This can't be said about DNSSEC, any key compromise and abuse is difficult if not impossible to detect. Imagine that but with DANE, indefinite MITM, scary.

> DNSSEC lets you bypass the danger of a rogue issuer, by swapping to an alternate domain in the worst case, whereas with CAs you have to hope that the rogue issuer doesn't decide to target you

That's an insane bypass though. "Just cut your arm off, then it won't hurt." Change your email, figure out how to patch millions of devices out in the wild, so many problems.

A rogue issuer is much less hassle short- and long-term to deal with. Most browsers ship CRLite or similar and can revoke the root quickly. You can resume operation with a new CA rather fast.

DNSSEC is a nice complement to WebPKI and vice versa, but for our all sake, it can't be the only source of trust.
Your code might need state after all: time
Yeah, with permanent delisting of the entire company as the penalty. Of course, these people don’t care. They’ll just spin up a new seller and thus the only people you end up hurting are legitimate partners updating their product line.
In every age group here, accidents are the leading cause of death. How does aggregating the data make accidents no longer the leading cause of death?
Are you saying that in the age of ai it’s impossible to tell whether the page is now featuring a completely new product without human review?
If someone reports it, manually review it.

If it's being abused, ban the seller!
Ah. This might be just that.

Does including all taxes amount to the same prices?
LangChain + a vector DB for embedding [0] sections of your doc would solve the problem today. You could also have failsafes that trigger human oversight based on confidence levels or other factors.

[0] https://python.langchain.com/en/latest/modules/indexes/getti...
If anyone hasn't seen it before the infamous previous logo design presentation:

https://www.goldennumber.net/wp-content/uploads/pepsi-arnell...
I guess it's early for this to matter too much for the count, but people who are not "developers" have also used ChatGPT to write code. I've read anecdotes.
Hegel by HyperText
I mean, they are very plainly not concerned about the OP or “state of architecting” but that this successful project coming from a student is going to inspire other students to copy the architecture shown here.

Explicitly,

> A bunch of people take information they come across on the internet and think that's the only way of doing things, so if someone comes across the post, looks at the architecture they might think building it with so many components is a required thing, not just optional for really big projects.

> So basically, I want to save myself and others time.

This seems like not only ridiculous critique, but also just plainly not the author’s problem what others choose to do with his open source project.

> Said differently, it's worrying that people decide to overengineer architectures like that before there's any real need. It's a sysops version of the early optimization problem

And why exactly is it yours or other commenter’s problem what people choose to do with their own time? How does it in any way shape or form impact you what this other person chose to do with their project that you will never maintain, contribute to, or likely even use?
you're telling me that Amazon in their infinite wisdom who already deals with all kinds of fraud in their system cannot flag if a product listing changes drastically or is describing something totally different?
I decided to check this out. I searched for "Don giovanni" and my first match was under "Works", telling me that "Don Giovanni" by W. A. Mozart (little pic of him), K. 527, is available in 1,182 tracks. Second match, amusingly, was "Don Juan" by "C. W. Gluck," Wq. 52, available in 17 tracks.

Choosing Don Giovanni, I get a link to see more by Wolgang Amadeus Mozart, and a detailed description of Don Giovanni, K. 527, KV527. There's an Editor's Choice recording by Teodor Currentzis from 2016 (79 tracks, 2 hr 50 min), or five (with See All) Popular Recordings from 1960, 1986, 1991, 1960 again, and 1966, ranging from 2 hr 38 min (Herbert von Karajan, Vienna Philharmonic) to 3 hr (Philharmonia Orchestra). I'll choose the Editor's Choice.

Album art up top, I see (in dim gray) "Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart," (in large white type) "Don Giovanni, K. 527," and (in gray, but larger than the composer) "Teodor Currentzis," along with tiny type tell me that this was released in 2016 and is in Hi-Res Lossless. Then a large Play button, no Shuffle button as the normal Music app has.

The tracks are "Ouvertura" (5:12), Notte e giorno faticar (No. 1, Introduzione: Leporello) (1:30), Non sperar... you know what? You get the idea. The metadata is presented perfectly.

Last night I was listening to Rachmaninoff Symphony No. 2 by the London Symphony Orchestra, Sir Simon Rattle conducting, and it was presented perfectly as well.[0] And it sounded wonderful!

0. https://i.imgur.com/XEZn2My.jpg
Fallout Writer Chris Avellone and Accusers Issue Joint Statement, Settle Lawsuit
We agree; this is precisely the problem area we’re focusing on!! We’re currently working on the ability for users to specify chunking strategies while providing a ton of guidance on this selection based on their particular data.
> I made an international transfer to pay for

I’ve been using crypto and stablecoins for this for nearly 7 years now. Basically it skips international transfer scrutiny and for both the sender and the recipient we are using local banking on each side.

The exposure time is like 5 minutes, which mitigates every theoretical issue with the confidence of a stablecoin, or even the volatility of any particular crypto.

So what would have been an international transfer is converted to a scrutiny-free domestic transfer, which goes way faster too.
> those who fly a lot should have to pay for the real price of their transport

Carbon offsets for a transatlantic flight cost about $15-30. Challenge accepted.
It's built using Go and html/template from the standard library.

For interactivity I wrote some custom JS, I think it's similar to libraries like https://htmx.org or https://turbo.hotwired.dev, this stuff is inside the application though.

Let me know if there's anything you were particularly interested in knowing.
EDIT: never mind, I didn't read your whole post, looks like you guys are working on an opensource option. Great!

Metal looks awesome. I've been comparing vector db solutions so your simple/abstracted sdk looks awesome. One thing I'd mention is with a solution like this that could be so critical to an apps functionality (and therefore so integrated into various parts of the app) I'd love to see that your team is vowing to give some sort of opensource self-hosted option. I want to root for any startup that is letting devs move faster in this area but there's a fear of committing to a solution that may pivot or be acquired/discontinued. Maybe even vowing a "safe-exit" for customers like I think rethinkdb did.

Good luck, looks awesome!
Salaries in the IT sector in Germany really are quite low compared to other countries. With several years of experience you still only earn around 70-80k per year. Entry level salaries can be as low as 45-50k. Almost on the level of full time office workers.
Because they call those socialist or communist governments. The real question is why they call them far-right and not something else.
Couple of fairly simple things they could do to at least help somewhat:

* Put reviews for current listing at the top of the reviews (currently default sort seems to be a vague "Top reviews", but can be changed to "most recent" which presumably accomplishes this. Vast majority never change defaults though)

* Clearly mark any review that is for a previous version of the listing, and provide a link to view the listing at time of review (so can easily see if it was a completely different product or a simple typo correction etc.)

* Perhaps make history of listing visible, so customers can see when and how the listing has changed
> Last I checked there was no way to review a seller on Amazon

What do you mean? Just click the Sellers name on the product-site, to get to their profile with all the reviews about them. There you will find a button to review them. Maybe there is an edgecase where it's not available?

EDIT And looking through my order-history, the review-buttons appears there too for older orders. Maybe when the date of return is up?
> Nitro keys are semi open source.

And Librem Key fully relies on FLOSS.
This is just facilitation of customer tips to employees, not an additional benefit paid to employees by Starbucks.
Cascade of Duty – Cod Using HTML and CSS Only
This might be off topic but has anyone else noticed the sloppiness in Apples' websites lately?

On both Safari and Firefox on my machine the titles on this page appear without the correct fonts (falling back to Times).

On apple.com a lot of buttons (eg. the buy button on https://www.apple.com/mac/) lead to 404 pages.

Trying to report these issues seems impossible, of course.
It's way more complicated than that.

For starters, a commercial scale composting operation needs inputs from various sources in order to achieve NPK balance - not just food waste. Therefore, the complexity increases by an order of magnitude as we have to orchestrate the logistics of food waste, manure, wood chips, and more.

Second is that compost is not even close to ammonia-based fertilizer in terms of elemental nitrogen, which is critical for our most calorie dense crops. Places like the Rodale Institue are not at all intellectually honest about organic production yields. Their systems fall apart at the global population level.

It is a fact that if we were to shift all-organic farming that we would need MORE land, and MORE people to create the same amount of food. That's the opposite of our current goal which is to create more food with less land and less people.

Third, the application of compost would actually increase soil compaction due to larger, heavier equipment required. It just so happens that these large equipment (tractors included) are not yet able to run on electricity. There are some electric tractors, yes, but nothing with the power equivalent to modern combines.

Fourth, is the bias toward energy density that I hinted at in the third point. But it isn't just tractors. Many farm operations are unable to electrify due to their proximity to the grid and the energy draw. I'm talking about grain storage and refinery, and many others.

These are all problems that could be solved with innovation. But to your point, it is probably HARDER than many people suppose. Definitely harder than you are making it out to be. Food systems are incredibly complicated. It is also incredibly optimized, and advocating for a massive shift comes with the intellectual responsibility of addressing this complexity and coming up with a solution that can compete with the status quo.

To your final point, the government is doing a lot to aid in the transition actually. Not sure where you are from, but the USDA is now offering more grant programs than ever before to address all of the above.
They could do a similarity diff. If you switch content from towels to solar panels I bet they could get pretty good signal just from text comparison. “This looks like a different product. Different products must use their own SKU. If you believe this is an error, appeal here.”
It does. The essential feature of capitalism is the motive to make a "profit". I'm explicitly saying capitalism is focused on "profit". Since you brought up communism, it has a different ideology which is not centered on "profit".

Does that make sense?

PS: Also I do not intend to debate capitalism vs. communism, I'm trying to convey the idea of "a society driven by profit".
If you completely understood your system and how it behaved you wouldn't need those fuzzing. Or stress testing.

It's because we build lousy software with lossy interfaces and strangely-undefined interactions that these tools exist. They're used when someone says "we'll never really know what's going on there, just throw some tooling at it and maybe we'll get lucky!"

One would hope we would try to make software more like the former than the latter.
Disney is a truly massive company. Looking at the performance of children's movies to gauge the overall health of Disney the company is sort of like looking at Whole Foods to gauge the overall health of Amazon.
I presume PayPal has enough pull to be manually whitelisted by gmail.
For hotels they still outsource to Expedia and the service is abysmal if you have any problems.
There are outsourcing firms whose sole job is to create unit tests. If there is one feature these LLMs do well right now, today, it is generating unit tests well. QA engineers in general were already treading on thin ice.
Relating to it as a creative process. Connecting directly with the artist, mind to mind, through the art. Being liberated from my current perspective. Story telling. Revolutionary mental states. New synergistic paradigms. All the actual reasons why people have been making art for many 1000s of years.

Or, just keep your pacifier, baby ;)
That's interesting. Venmo (ik still PayPal-owned but somehow not trash (edit: yet)) seems to protect you from this by rejecting your payments early if they contain bad words. I found this out when trying to pay for a Cuban sandwich.
One data point I can provide is: $900,000,000.00 — which is the cost for a bank for NOT doing this.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ing-groep-settlement-mone...
It still respects block lists and mutes, as far as I can tell.

Though that may change as some twitter folks have mentioned how much of a burden that block lists supposedly place on the site.
Wow that's interesting -- thanks for sharing. I grew up in tropical country so this is a very different perspective and an experience I never had. Yes such sound would surely scare me.

PS: Though I was wondering in my post about just phrases as they are written and read, not necessarily as they are heard.
It may not know when you order but surely knows when the return happens whose inventory was used
Reminds me of https://www.wired.com/2015/11/null/
We’ll see, certainly. I remain hopeful.
C++ has it's ups and downs.

It's still semi-compatible with C, templates are about as close to macros as you'll get with a syntax; and the algorithms parts of stdlib are in many ways brilliant, thanks to Stepanov.

But the complexity is definitely overwhelming.
You don’t think they were motivated by the cost of return processing and wasted fulfillment usage? All of these things are significant costs at the scale of returns that Amazon receives.
ChatGPT can definitely work this out.
Using ChatGPT to generate Git commit messages
What about non-profits and government institutions?
Work document privacy for NDA stuff and capability of doing meetings?
>They [=The Daily Telegraph] were highly supportive of The Wrong Side throughout WW2

This is completely false. You're again thinking of the Mail (if you're not just making stuff up). But even the Mail wasn't pro-Nazi during WW2. I'm not sure what sort of weird ahistorical picture of WW2 you must have to think that a British newspaper would even have been allowed to publish pro-Nazi articles in the middle of the war!

>and even now are agitating for violence against minorities and refugees.

Where? You still seem to be thinking of headlines that have appeared in the Mail, not the Telegraph.

It's also inaccurate to suggest the Telegraph is in any sense a tabloid. I'm left-leaning and do not much like the Telegraph as a newspaper. However, it was, for a long time, a serious and respected paper.
Barista starting Hourly Pay Range near me: $15.50 to $17.50 (before tips)

> From free coffee to competitive pay, Starbucks is proud to offer a comprehensive compensation and benefits package to our eligible part-time and full-time partners. Benefits include 100% tuition coverage through our Starbucks College Achievement Plan, health coverage with a variety of plans to choose from, and stock & savings programs like our equity reward program, Bean Stock. What’s more, Starbucks offers flexible scheduling and opportunities for paid time off. Visit starbucksbenefits.com for details.

This is a non union store to my knowledge.

Looking at this as pessimistically as possible, I'll guess nobody is getting 40 solid hours a week (aka they strategically cycle through 20 to 30 hour/week part time employees)

7 days a week, 25 hours a week, let's say you don't work 3 days (you are 100% off, not on call in case the store gets busy or something)

25 hours a week, 4 days a week. about 6.25 hours a shift. let's say it's $16/hr

$100 in a 6.25 hour day, 4 days a week, $400/week gross

Let's say you don't work at all 4 weeks of the year (store closed for holiday, you take unpaid vacation/sick time/call out, you don't use PTO, i don't know). 52 weeks a year, say you work 48 full.

$16/hr, 25 hours a week, 48 weeks a year: $19.2k/yr before any tips

$16/hr, 30 hours a week, 48 weeks a year: $23.0k/yr before any tips

$16/hr, 35 hours a week, 48 weeks a year: $26.8k/yr before any tips

$16/hr, 40 hours a week, 48 weeks a year: $30.7k/yr before any tips

$16/hr, 40 hours a week, 50 weeks a year: $32.0k/yr before any tips

so the upper bound for what you'll most likely ever earn gross as a barista at starbucks is $32k/yr

say the union comes in, negotiates. what does this upper bound increase to?
If your family had Apple Music Family rather than Spotify Family, you would have this option for free.
These days people tend to have multiple aspects to their identity that they keep separate. You probably want to have a Github identity separate from, say, a social media identity or, say, your legal identity. Verifying such identities is heavily contextual. So a system that lets you generate your own identities in a well standardized way is useful.
I think there's a larger issue at play here. The standard for "knowingly selling" for AML regulated businesses and a gas station are vastly different. That's why you never heard of a gas station getting charged for that, and there probably never has been.

I believe the point was that AML regulations only apply to some categories of businesses and others not, which makes them ineffective. They can be a slight annoyance to criminals but they do not stop them. For money transmission, it is trivial to work around them. And for spending, at a gas station, there's no problem at all.

It is is just all a very costly and ineffective security theater, not to mention the many moral issues that come with it (e.g. billions of law-abiding, unbanked people).