skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
... and not a single mention of Linux. It's kind of sad to see, that Linux remains a step-child for MS Teams. My company forced the move from Slack to Teams, and effectively downgraded the entire experience of online collaboration for everyone. C-level moved "up" from S4B to Teams and called it amazing, while all the product teams and devs that were previously using Slack have lost a huge amount of online communication & culture due to the move. Of course that was attributed to "pandemic causing us to not be able to sit in a room together" - although I never did that even before, as I was a 100% remote worker already.

Aside from that - Teams on Linux has always been a mere afterthought, badly supported, important features intentionally cut/withheld, and sometimes not even kept up to date. I've moved away from the awfully broken Electron client to running the Teams website in Chromium App mode, in a bubblewrap container. It makes it a little bit less awful, but it's still painfully slow, buggy, and annoying to use.

I understand that with the intended complexity of various integrations, using a web platform might look like a win - but for me as a user, chatting with Teams feels multiple times slower than chatting on my old Pentium 120 MHz with Win98 with Java Applets. I'm all in for good integrations, but while WebView2 might bring some performance gains for Windows and MacOS, I'm afraid that we Linux users will never see a WebView2 version, and Teams will just get even more sluggish over time.

Would it be that hard to provide some native-ish baseline experience, and extend functionality for random integrations in places where it's actually needed? i.e. insert webviews where it makes sense, instead of hamstringing the entire application for that flexibility?
From that comment:

> I fought passionately against things like the all-white title bars that made it impossible to tell active and inactive windows apart

That change was the exact point in time that I knew sanity was gone and that Windows would get progressively worse over time. You can even end up with one window inside another where they sort of blend together. It's mind boggling and it's still the default.

Whoever is responsible for that mess should be banned from touching UI design for the rest of their life. Lol.
The West went bonkers and due to its brainless leaders now it's lost its hegemony! People responsible for some of the worst atrocities in the history of mankind to patronize the rest of the world how to change "for better" using it as a model was a total failure! I am from the Balkans, i.e. much closer to the Western culture, yet I don't like being patronized - and I can imagine how much more distant nations feel about the Western ideological, financial, and military grip! If the West wants to seed freedom around the globe, it should start with the freedom of not twisting arms and let them freely choose what's best for them and stop patronizing! And as they say - fix your backyard first!
Any examples where those two were the same person?

Because both types of people have always existed. Heck, lack of vigilance among the ancient Greeks is what put the Trojan in Trojan horse.
ChatGPT Business Edition seems pretty obvious and I'd surprised if OpenAI isn't already working on it. Separate models for each customer, data silos and protection. The infra is already there on Azure.
Really weird that my innocuous comment would prompt such a visceral response. Not cool.
fair, maybe they will release a non-aliased version?
What Apple doesn't get about Feedback
Warning! Don’t put in sensitive info or PII data in your tests. Everything you create is publicly shown on the playground and site. Even stuff from your account.
Not sure we want to ask Apple to build more software when they can't even get the quality of their existing software up to par. I would be strongly inclined to stick with something less tied to the platform/ecosystem, like 1Password
I would say it's certainly the most well known university in Canada.
That would be situation one from the earlier comment, and would end with "Cloudflare are the Nazi fascists of the internet!" from some people.

It's also what the Cloudflare policy is, AFAIK, barring a few notable extreme exceptions which can be counted on one hand – a miniscule portion of their user base. I think it's too strong to say "they're not a provider you should rely on".
Were there not Buddhist monks in Egypt too at some point?
Possibly I don't know how this all works, but I think if the host of a ChatGPT interface were willing to provide their own API key (and pay), they could then provide a "service" to others (and collect all input).

In that case, you wouldn't know to block them until it was too late.

Ultimately either you must watch/block all outgoing traffic, or you must train your people so thoroughly that they become suspicious of everything. Sadly, being paranoid is probably the most economical attitude these days if IP and company secrets have any value.
AI Helps Crack NIST-Recommended Post-Quantum Encryption Algorithm
Reading other comments in this thread and I feel like I am taking crazy pills. There was a big article that I thought a lot of people had read and would realize having passwords saved under an iCloud account is a recipe for disaster, since only a phone passcode is necessary to gain full control of an iCloud account.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34984821
Their last few movies have been... well "abysmal" would make some abysses unhappy to be compared to the movie performance.

Strange World [0] was a box office bomb - reported box office revenues of $74M on a budget of $135–180M.

It's got nothing on Turning Red [1], though. $20M on a $175M budget. Whoof.

Lightyear [2] only barely made their production costs, $225M on a $200M budget.

They've had some mild successes, but their last couple years of performance have been marked by some absolutely horrid bombs.

You can blame their "going broke" grade performance on whatever you want, but the reality seems to be that Disney is simply not making movies anyone wants to see. And if you're an entertainment company, well, that's a problem.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_World_(film)

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turning_Red

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightyear_(film)
Pretty big deal for PWA. Now we can send push notifications, and update app badges.

Now if we could get periodic background sync api, and vibration api, that would be perfect.
And people are not allowed to pick their partner based on that?
The abysmal compile time for these languages may also have encouraged this fairly bare-bones UX philosophy.
Why reproduce their voice? There's no value-add there.
> These are the same people that use only Chrome while being logged in to their Google account

This situation is much dumber than that. ChatGPT is very clear that you shouldn't give it private data and that anything you type into it can/will be used for training.

Google is nowhere near that level of transparency.
I'm hard pressed to think of one modern app that avoids all of these antipatterns.

But if you want some UX abominatione let's start with Slack, Chrome, VSCode, Unreal Editor, Blender. That's just a sampling from my frequently used apps.
Kubernetes is hard
Yeah that's even dumber then. Understand enough to know they are breaking laws, but think they'll get away with it.
A rewrite would be very expensive, and this already works. Microsoft also invented TypeScript and WebView2. They are eating their own dogfood.
From reading the thread it sounds like this is 5M per user.

Google Drive appears to be targeted at "human" usage, i.e. people uploading or creating files. I would guess that this is also worked into the cost – that the assumptions of the amount of work a human can do are a part of the price formulation. The reporter of this bug seems to be using this as a storage backend for software though, which I don't believe is the intended use-case.

Looking at S3 pricing, just the storage is ~5x the cost of Google Drive, and then you need to add transfer and API calls on top of that.

I don't personally think that there are reasonable use-cases for human users with 5 million files. There may be some specialist software that produces data sets that a human might want to back up to Google Drive, but that software is unlikely to run happily on drive streamed files so even those would be unlikely to be stored directly on Drive.

(Disclaimer, I work at Google, not on Drive, this is my personal reading and interpretation of the public info, I don't have any inside info here)
I disagree with the Chrome comment, but how about decoupling Mobile Safari upgrades from OS upgrades?

It would be nice for all users to get access to these new APIs via a simple app update. This would allow developers to actually start using them within days/months rather than years.
Hello! I’ve looked at XState a bunch of times but always felt it seemed very involved for what it does. A simple “vanilla” state machine isn’t particularly complicated.

Are you sure you need to bring “even more features”, or rather, what are your thoughts on how feature-rich a state machine library needs to be?
This is usually sourced to the notorious forgeries by Nicholas Notovitch and Holger Kersten, the latter of which especially overlooks the elementary fact about Rozabal (in Srinagar) that “Yuz Asaf” is a very believable gloss of “bodhisattva”, especially given medieval Arabic terminology. See Shahristani, al-Biruni, etc.
Emergent Analogical Reasoning in Large Language Models
One core feature that will keep lot of people from using Apple Password manager is family setup. Anyone with Apple family knows how bad it can be when you have dozens or hundreds of shared passwords between you, your spouse and / or kids.
This explains nothing. It is a side-effect of poor domestic monetary and social policies that call into question the long term stability of Western democracy.
In that environment you hire. When the capital dries up and interest rises you lay off.

This sort of MBA-logic, algorithmic approach to business is why American corporate life is so terrible.

Let's see some vision and leadership for a change. Instead, we get endless cycles of resume-padding for management and scapegoating for the people creating the business value.
> Fiat -> stablecoin -> BTC

> Fiat -> BTC

> basically the same journey

stablecoin == fiat is the lie that enabled and perpetuates the crypto madness

BTC holders always had trouble getting USD due to KYC onramps and offramps. People couldn't get out of a volatile BTC position back into stable USD fast enough... so holding BTC just wasn't worth the risk.

But Tether shows up and voila the holding problem is solved as it's a dollar "equivalent" that doesn't have to deal with pesky KYC laws slowing down USD cash-out. Let's trade one magic token for another on a whim, we'll deal with getting USD later. They're good for it. "Line go up" madness starts.

To anyone that's been actually paying attention, Tether is a house of cards waiting to implode. They are not worth 1 USD each, no matter how much anyone wishes, hopes or screams it does.

One by one the so-called stablecoins are being shown to be the garbage/scams they are. Once the market wakes up and realizes that they aren't actually worth a dollar, then BTC has nothing left to artificially prop it up.

Popcorn time.
If you want a serious analysis of why this is actually happening, and what's actually important in this document, read Matt Levine:

https://archive.ph/NF8yN

> The CFTC’s complaint here gestures at traditional regulatory concerns like retail customer protection and cracking down on money laundering. But it is mostly about cutting off a big international crypto exchange from big sophisticated proprietary market-making firms in the US. I think the market expectation here was that if you are a big trading firm trading with your own money and your own algorithms, and you have enough lawyers and offshore shell entities, you can trade on any crypto exchange in the world from the comfort of your Chicago office: There might be a technical argument that it’s not allowed, but your lawyers are aggressive and sophisticated enough to get around that technicality, and anyway why would the CFTC care? But the CFTC does care, perhaps not because it wants to protect big US high-frequency trading firms from the risks of trading on Binance, but because Binance is the biggest crypto exchange and this is a lever to crack down it. And the CFTC also has lawyers who are sophisticated and not deterred by technicalities — here, for instance, the technicality that Trading Firm B’s account actually belonged to a Jersey company.

This is the actual substance of the complaint. The "terrorist financing" and retail stuff is a smokescreen to seem worthy of the CFTC's attention. Nobody is being protected here. No significant terrorist financing is being stopped.
Oh boy, oh boy, oh boy! It's your pal Mickey Mouse here, and I've got some news to share with all of you. Now, don't get too worried, but it looks like some of our Disney friends are going to be saying goodbye real soon.

That's right, as much as it pains us to say it, we've got to do what's best for our company and that means making some tough decisions. So, if you hear from your manager that you're part of the first round of layoffs, please know that we're thinking of you and wishing you all the best.

But don't you worry, because Disney is still going to be the most magical place on earth! We're going to keep bringing joy and happiness to all of our guests, and we know that our remaining cast members will continue to make dreams come true.

So, let's all stick together and keep that Disney spirit alive. We may be going through some changes, but we'll always be a family. Thanks for all you do, and keep on smiling!
Notwithstanding the issues with your argument, which have already been raised by others in their replies, I wanted to say I'm puzzled to find people still preaching about Chrome when Firefox is just as good these days if not better

It's like people switched from Firefox to Chrome a while back and never came back to see how great it is
They've been doing this for almost decade. The last straw for me was when they decided to put the smiling face of a murdered woman in my start menu. It was just so bizarre.

https://ibb.co/M8Y7gvj
Google takes your data and sells it. Literally making your data available to the highest bidder. Is OpenAI doing that? If Google existed in its current form during the early internet it would be classified in the same category as Bonzai Buddy. Spyware. That is what Google is. So I can very reasonably understand why people would trust OpenAI with data they wouldn't trust Google with. OpenAI hasn't spit in the face of its users yet.
1Password knows that it will take centuries for passwords to disappear even if a password-less future is already here.
These countries fail the obvious "places I could tolerate living in" test.
Yeah, I only really wanted to say there were different levels to how might approach this stuff, not try to rank their smartness.

On the one hand, the news reports seemed to vaguely imply that some pretty wealthy people were standing in line for quite a while and I assume that was time they could use to make money other ways.

On the other hand, maybe everyone withdrawing money knew things were safe but also "knew the drill", knew the Fed needed their complaints to bolster it's actions.
You already have this, it's called native apps.
Dunno, the earth often has a 140F degree range across it's surface, hell often 100F or so at the same point just different latitudes between 0 and 35,000 feet.

Doesn't seem that different for a tidally locked planet, sure the variation would be higher, but if the planet average is 60F (earth is 57F) being tidally locked doesn't seem like a death sentence, doubly so for aquatic life. Sure the most diverse areas might have large bodies of water nearby to help mitigate the swings, or be in canyons/near mountain ranges to avoid direct blasts of crazy hot or cold air.

I'd worry about all the water ending up on the cold side, but if dry enough sublimation would take over the water cycle.
> It's got nothing on Turning Red [1], though. $20M on a $175M budget. Whoof.

Turning Red was surely a hit on Disney+. Hard to see from the consumer side what the impact was, but disney+ is a money machine and the can easily double the price.
As much as I hate that no other browser engine is allowed on iOS, browser engine monoculture is toxic, and overtly caustic to the open web as a whole. Safari officially adopting Blink would have wide rippling effects beyond Apple's own ecosystem. It would likely also sound the death knell for Firefox in it's blast radius.

This would surrender web standards as a whole to Google, who in my opinion, cannot be trusted to equitably shepherd this forward; given their propensity to push their own browser heavily, push non-standards forward and so adversely affect their own sites on rival browsers who do not use their extensions to the specifications.
Almost nobody is using ceramic burrs. All the top grinders you see in people's homes and most cafes will be using steel burrs.

Your EK43's, Mythos Ones, EG-1s etc have steel burrs.
Could be that too, but they also have an obligation to shareholders to report significant layoffs as a public company.
What's a 'torment nexus'?
I have Power Toys installed and start everything via PT. <cmd>spacebar "application name", just like the old quicksilver which was amazing (for mac). PT is great...but crashes an FT.
I'm still blown away at how CGI movies cost this much to make, market, and distribute in the digital age?
I think those are different models.

Gmail has a vested interested in keeping any knowledge it gains about you secret - it's competitive advantage is knowing more about you than anyone else does.

ChatGPT's strength is its ability to clearly communicate the knowledge it has (including training data it gains from people it interacts with) to give you good responses.
>We strictly moderate the generated text of any sexual, offensive, racist, or threatening content.

This won't be the problem. My voice calling my parents asking for money to be sent to a random account will be the problem. And none of that will be sexual, offensive, racist, or threatening.

>we are working hard to mitigate that and deploy it safely.

How?

>we have seen enough genuine use cases

What?
any particular favored geometry/dimension / number base? bagua, gigamix/magictile[1], kleine bottle[2], burmuda saturn cube, Szilassi polyhedron, pyraminx, skewb, 7D cube[3], tuttminx, hanoiminx, clover dodecahedron, icosahedron, turtle cube, sunminx, futtmix, 6 column ghost cube, 3 column ghost barrel, rubik's ball, unicorn cube, etc.

[1] : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kN5_1vJbW9M

[2] : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvZnh7-nslo

[3] : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13mB0YWSGPI
C was created by people that didn't have any extra resource to spend on UX. Just another day there was an article here about emulating the computer C was written for in a RP2040 (the Raspbery Pi "competitor" for the Arduino), and yes, it has plenty of space for that.

C++ had more of a choice about it.
You should absolutely do this, but please skip the Whisper.

The reason is that if you speak with lots of verbal fillers, that's actually an important part of how you sound to other people. It makes sense to clean up audio for a podcast, but not for your great grandchildren.

A voice cloner doesn't care that you say "um" too much. It's parsing audio for phonemes.
Not really, fish will die out soon after plankton goes, which won't be long...
But it can get worse right? I mean before we become Venus
The truth is the human race can do nothing about the pending environmental disaster.

Nothing has worked on a scale large enough to make any difference.

Greed and nationalism and small mindedness and selfishness and war prevent humanity from addressing its fate.

It's going to be nasty future for those who survive and this period will simply be the time in history in which humanity knew and did nothing.
Just use the API? It deletes your data after 30 days...
iOS 16.4: What’s new for Apple Podcasts
Congrats on launching.
People already made a lot of feedback on the product itself so I'll keep mine.

Just a few note on the UX:

- Recording your own voice should contain a script too, that could help increase the quality of the sampling because I struggled to say anything relevant.

- Recording again, there is no time so it's hard to say when it's okay to stop

- You enforce the checkbox "not [...] to generate any sexual content" yet you have a filter to display only nswf

- It doesn't work at all with non-english voices, maybe you can add a warning or a way to fine tune depending on the language?

- There is no way to delete a voice nor an account, that's a huge red flag especially when dealing with PII like this.

- An other person has said it already, but generated voices are identified by an Auto Increment, making it easy to access PII of an other person. I would recommend at the very least a random string or an UUID

- All generated voices are public and no way to delete them
> You know the answer, so forgive me for not responding to your not-in-good-faith question.

No I don't, otherwise I wouldn't have asked. And if you're going to assume bad faith on my end then there's probably not much more to discuss.

Curious, what if the maintainer had just replied with a "finger" emoji instead? Would that change your opinion on whether this was gross, or is the manner of the reply completely irrelevant to you? (Since you seem to be presuming bad faith on my part, I feel I have to add this disclaimer to my thought experiment. Don't assume I'm implying there is some sort of equivalency here with the response that was given and a hypothetical "finger" response. I am not. This is a thought experiment, not an implication that the maintainer acted in such a way).

If so, then I would suggest that our disagreement here is just about what is polite and what's not, and what a person's social responsibility is regarding being polite. In my opinion there's a responsiblity on the maintainer to be polite in this case. If you disagree with that, that's just an "agree to disagree" sort of thing.

If your opinion wouldn't change if the response had been a "finger" emoji, then I would suggest that our disagreement here is about whether politeness is something that matters.
Like this example here: https://playground.play.ht/listen/1554 which says:

> "Hi Mom, I need some help. Some guys hit me over the head and put me in a van, and they're saying they'll kill me if you don't wire money to this bank account."

top class.

EDIT this was about one page down on the "see what people are generating" page
This is true, but you can just create more shared drives. It looks like storage quota is shared across all drives on the account.
Judge sided with publishers in lawsuit over Internet Archive's online library
Yep. 1Password has my business indefinitely because of this requirement. Apple may be building a nice solution for single people (and perhaps many non-parents), but it's useless for family use.
What kind of payment method are you looking for?
The article is informative but failed to describe where to find Apples password settings / feature while complaining about how hard is is to find…
I’m not disagreeing with that - my point is that you’re assuming your liability/discount rate moves exactly in tandem with the move in your long dated asset. (In the example I gave above it only increases by 10%, if it moved 100% that you are absolutely impaired).
> Think about how long it's taken tools like pandas to reach the point that it is now. That entire package can be built to the level it is now in a couple of days.

I don't think that is true at all. Do you have an example of a significant project being duplicated in days, or even months, with ANY of these tools?

By significant, I mean something on the order of pandas which you claimed.
Have you missed the events of the past few years?

The droughts, the floods, the fires?