skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That’s why it’s kind
of painful sometimes if you have somebody else working on the
project. They never code stuff exactly the way you like to see it
coded. I remember when we were working on BASIC, I’d go back and
recode other people’s sections of code, without making any dramatic
improvement. That bothers people when you go in and do that, but
sometimes you just feel like you have to do it. -- Bill Gates, Programmers at Work (1986), ed. S. Lammers
it isn’t always possible, and cantor’s proof demonstrates that neatly, by giving an algorithm to construct (an infinite number of) counter-examples of non-mappable elements of the larger set.
I rolled my eyes when I saw your comment, then I watched the video. The lips and cheeks are distinctly botox'd.
I would recommend you to check out Aisler. Boards made in Germany, cheap and fast! And pretty good quality as far as I can tell. I haven't noticed any defects in many boards ordered.
It's hard to to tell how much of that is caused by the default system prompt setup that the two chat systems have.

You can easily cause chatgpt to radically change its style by prepending the right system prompt. Some people even published many many "jailbreak" prompts that undid the safety priming that openai's system prompt defines.

From what I read it does indeed seem that openai's experience is much more balanced; they generally seemed to have tuned things quite well and the competition is lagging behind.

However it's not clear how much of that is due to fundamental quality of the model or how things have been polished in the last step.

It may sound like an academic nitpick, but it's central to any discussions about whether Google has really been left behind and has lost the grip on AI.

They are not doing a great service to their own bottom line by blocking access to a public beta to so many billions of people
Open source does not mean "I take random projects, integrate them into my product, without any credits, without any acknowledgments". It means "I take projects, integrate them into my product and follow the minor implications of the license"

For example the MIT-License has a rule:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

And as far as I can see from this article, there was no acknowledgment. According to tldrlegal (Sadly don't have the time to read through the entire AGPL license): https://www.tldrlegal.com/license/gnu-affero-general-public-..., you have to include the license and copyright
Lol. One probably has to work at OpenAI to try and fix their LLM thing. The one they let the public use probably doesnt learn from its users. Hopefully. I wouldn't let just any data in my LLM. When those things get garbage in they just put garbage out.
I'm going to call myself a developer. Can't hurt!
This might be true, but as someone who has lived in the U.S. and Europe I can say utterly unequivocally that I preferred Health Care in Europe. I wasn't even in one of the European countries with a great reputation for Health Care.

Health Care in the U.S. isn't just bad, its outright fucking brutal. An elderly friend of mine recently fell and went to an urgent care where they couldn't get him into the x-ray machine. They told him to go to an emergency room where he waited for _13_ fucking hours with a broken pelvis. I'm basically 100% sure that such emergency room bullshit literally kills people from stress or exposing them to other sick people. You can't even wait in your damn car and just have them text you - they just force you to sit in this horrible room with a ton of sick people for hours on end.

The U.S. Health Care system absolutely fucking blows.
Why repost? This
Birth rates are not the same thing as gender disparity, obviously.
RedKetchup – Online Tools
Not necessarily, but can be. What if instead of USSR, you substitute US or Sweden? What if you some (not all) of the Muslims in Sweden want a separate Muslim country from Sweden? Or some (not all) of the Mormons one day decide they want a separate mormon country away from United States?
Bitcoin can't physically protect or fight a country.

It's just not the same at all.

Referencing the us military instead of discussing Bitcoin and it's issues is strawmanning.

Instead of arguing about the point you talk about something different.

And as stated a few times: yes we need to discuss the energy usage of ALl things.

But on a Bitcoin topic the discussion is about Bitcoin and not the us military
The chemicals are on the seeds as well, sometimes to a significant degree, unless they're processed before sale. You're right about the danger of trying it.
Very harsh on fridges. The man has no personality at all.
> how this special community of wolves generalize to other? article doesn't care enough to say.

Parents and children. Wolf packs are just a family of related animals.
> The central government plays a relatively limited role in health care in Denmark.

So the exact opposite of what people usually mean when they say they want public healthcare.

Words mean something.
I'm no expert but I think the trick is to say "give me a function that for any element in Set A, returns a matching element in Set B".

For mapping integers to even numbers it's f(x)->x*2

But for mapping integers to real numbers - there is no possible mapping.

Cantor's Diagonal Argument is really easy to follow - watch a YouTube vid or two on the topic. Also Hilbert's Hotel is well covered.
You and I may, but I’m skeptical that “we could all” do so. Even a hacked together sand/charcoal filter only goes so far when we’re talking about populations.
In addition, states (as the pirnary regulators of insurance) should adopt a rule that if an insurer has a policy which directs, incentivizes, or which managenment knows or should reasonably know results in denials without good faith review, the state then has a cause of action against the insurer for damages of equal to triple the amount originally denied without appropriate review (whether or not later paid), and will, if necessary, pierce the corporate veil to recover it and, separately, each medical reviewer who is found to have denied a claim without good faith review shall be fined an amount equal to the value of claims so denied and prohibited (regardless of whether their medical license may later be restored) from being responsible for medical review of insurance claims in the state in the future.
If someone were to add noise to the llama weights and then retrain a little, would anyone be able to tell? Could that org then pass it off as their own training, MIT licensed for the good of humanity?
I was thinking few days ago, In 20 years we will probably be able to say something like “Make a TV show that is mix of Game of thrones and Lord of the rings, has 4 seasons with 10 episodes each and main character is played by Tom Hanks and co-star Sandra Bullock” and you just start watching, probably tweak it as you go, saying more fighting, explore more story in desert about dragons…
Hadn’t read that Graham post but it’s spot on (and very HN, lol).

That said, it’s not easy to see why he’s “right” if you’re operating under external validation. Getting out of that mindset is, imo, the most difficult challenge. I’ve had friends who have struggled for many years and want to change, yet are sucked back in. It doesn’t exactly help that society is oriented towards that axis.

Saying “don’t do that” isn’t very effective. Instead, I think it’s better to express those ideas more clearly and see where it takes you. For instance, “I want to be recognized by my peers because…” and then follow along until you realize that you just want to be accepted and belong, and that’s ok. But then you’ll find it substantially easier and “truer” to find good people, instead of impressing a bunch of strangers who don’t care about you even if you’re cool. And then focus on how you’re gonna spend the rest of your time without worrying about other peoples judgments.
> I ask: tell me about c++’s std::move()

Honest question: what do you expect the answer to be? Pedantically, the "correct" answer is that it statically casts its argument to an xvalue. Is this a way to tell if the candidate understands value categories?
The closing of the open web is the only recourse companies have against scraper AI GPT’s. Openness is being exploited and techniques and trades will become closed again. In order to learn how to code in the next Vulkan API, you must work for a studio, is not a world I want to live in.
As I understand, the "work" was already done, the only thing missing was sending a heads-up email with "hey, this seems iffy, maybe you ought to look into it".

I dunno, I generally report issues I find in software, paid or not, as I've always done. Takes usually ~10 minutes and 1% of the time, they ask for more details and I spend maybe 20 minutes more to fill out some more details.

Never been paid for it ever, most I gotten was a free yearly subscription. But in general I do it because I want what I use to be less buggy.
This is a straw man. There is nobody on this Earth claiming that sum types are necessary to solve a problem. Product types aren't necessary either. You could just write everything in Assembly. Or maybe raw bytecode if you want.

As should be patently fucking obvious to anyone who has been commenting on a technology web site for as long as you have, sum types are a tool. They are a tool for expressing clearly and concisely the idea that a value can be exactly one of several possible options. That tool then interacts with the rest of the language based on that invariant, sometimes providing things like exhaustiveness checking and pattern matching. Put all this together, and you have a very succinct and very clear way of representing certain kinds of values in a program.

Your comment might as well go through ripgrep and talk about how functions aren't needed. "They could have just used goto here and there."

> I looked at all instances and didn’t see anything game-changing. It’s a nice syntax and it should have really good performance, but such idioms are way too low-level to change any game.

Sum types were game changing to me when I learned about them over a decade ago. Since then, they have been a significant factor in how I think about and structure data in programs.

I have zero interest in trying to convince someone like you that you should think it's game changing. That's not the point. Maybe you could do some perspective taking and realize that others might just think differently than you.
100% agree. Back circa 2010-2011, Apple’s obj-c documentation held back my iOS coding career. Coming from javadocs, I just couldn’t wrap my head around apple’s style.
How much do you want to bet that social services has an exception to this? Such an exception would enable them to make extra money and "think of the children" ...
Why is this text though? Is there video?
That is really important to note: the spread of the Cortex-M0 has been amazing for embedded software. Before, compilers were vendor-managed for their proprietary core, and now they are basically mainline GCC because of the uniform use of the ARM instruction set.

I remember using a vendor fork of GCC 2 (released in 1999) to compile for a specific microcontroller in 2015, but since that vendor now releases Cortex-M0's, the vendor-blessed compiler uses a near-mainline GCC.
> Back in the ’80s and ’90s, Eurasian wild boar were brought here to be raised for their meat.

> A number of the animals escaped from their pens and mated with domestic pigs.

Yet another human caused issue. What a surprise.
The Two-Part code review, or how to build software that will last
Stanford Compilers course:
https://learning.edx.org/course/course-v1:StanfordOnline+SOE...
This time it was a high-thébaine batch, but no reason it couldn’t have been a high-morphine batch.

The thébaine is found in the pod the same way as morphine is, not the seed itself. But if the seeds aren’t washed enough and the variety isn’t a low alkaloid one…

Not sure how much the manufacturers test. Obviously one wasn’t testing for thébaine.
I Got Investigated by the Secret Service
"How did skynet manage to take over almost every computer on earth?"

[Download now, free waifu personality for your home PC]
Looking at GPAs, ECs, and test scores, I strongly think so. I suspect it's because of the family culture, and parents modeling correct behavior at home. It's not about AA vs. other ethnicities. My MBA class had a number of second generation Nigerian Americans, who had a similar culture with high expectations from kids.
Aircraft carriers are not for disrupting sea transport.

The utility they provide is the ability to deploy a US airbase and a full air wing within strike distance of any foreign capital.
Unless they can somehow guarantee that the model(s) were not trained on any data later than the 2021 balance sheet, then this is a completely useless exercise and is basically a case of "hindsight is 20/20".
I don’t think we should trust the soundness of their algorithm. I’ve worked in the healthcare space before, and the perverse incentives involved should make everyone extremely skeptical of insurance companies’ motivations, procedures, and algorithms.
It blocks renewables.

It consumes them.

Show me a real project which actually had a energy net positive and don't show me all those garbage green washing papers from Bitcoin companies which do not proof any of this.
>As a simple example I recommend trying to have it multiply two large numbers, it does a decent job guestimating but obviously can't do the recursive steps required to generate a correct answer.

Is it worse than the average human at mental arithmetic? I haven't done detailed benchmarks, but for my usecase it only gets maths wrong once it gets way past the range that I could do myself.

Personally, I find the fact that it can't say "I don't know" to be much more offputting than the dodgy maths.
"Suits make a corporate comeback," says the New York Times
Full-body-depilatory is part of my gender-identity. Contradict me and face the twitter wrath.
That was best practices in the 2000s.

Today best practice is using the zero trust security model and sandboxing everything.
In general any type of hormonal anything is probably dangerous. Endocrine system is incredibly complex and connected in many different, mostly unknown ways.

And contraceptives play with hormones that are central to what makes women women.

These hormones are not just limited to regulating when eggs are released from ovaries, they take part in a lot of other processes. It is absolutely not surprising then that there will be other effects of long term hormonal supplementation.

I think the best course of action would be to work on other, non-hormonal contraceptive alternatives.
Ok now I’m curious what beer is served at CERN. I am not familiar with any Swiss beer and only a handful of unspectacular French beers.
This depends if AI training is considered to be fair use or not.
Because if its, the license doesn't matter.
IANAL, but I would say it's because these are recruitment letters, not acceptance policies. As in: it alters where you look, not what you're looking for. And that can alter the balance in the representation that you end up with, even if your selection criteria are exactly the same across all groups.

It's the same as hiring policies. Imagine you have an objective test that you can give candidates, and you are willing to accept anyone who gets a 5 on a 5-point scale. The test is completely independent of race. You have two schools to draw candidates from. One is 90% white, the other 90% Black. You have resources to recruit at only one school. You want to increase the representation of Black employees, without lowering your standards.

Which school do you recruit at? The 90% Black one. You end up with employees who are exactly as qualified as if you had recruited at the other school, but a higher percentage of them are Black. If you're white and go to the second school, your chances of getting an offer are no different. If you're white (or Black) and go to the first school, you get no recruiter and unless you find out about the position on your own, you're screwed. If the schools are the same size, then you could say that being white lowered your chances of getting hired, as a direct result of the choice that the recruiter made.

Does the recruiter have a responsibility to make your odds of being admitted independent of your race? What would that mean? If there are 100 schools to choose from, it would mean that the recruiter would have to go to every one of them, and spend an amount of time at each inversely proportional to the school percentage of some race, which doesn't take into account the overall size of each school... it doesn't even work mathematically.

Back to the original example, imagine if Sparse Country states had twice as many good Asian male candidates as Asian female, and twice as many of those as good white candidates. (The percentages of not good candidates could be completely different, even reversed, and it wouldn't change anything.) Nothing stops any of those candidates from applying. But you can adjust your recruiting policies to get roughly the same number of good applications from each group.

This reduces the odds that a given Asian male (sampled evenly from the population) will end up admitted. But it does not affect the odds for an Asian male who chooses to apply.
Nobody can give you a surely working advice on this. There's no "best way" on starting a company and you shouldn't search for one. Do what you think is good and makes you happy.
Anecdotally, the times I've felt most impressed by ChatGPT usually ended up being exactly like this.

Even as an LLM skeptic, I've had chat sessions with ChatGPT that felt unbelievable at the time, where it almost seemed to be generating incredibly cogent ideas and arguments all on its own. Then, after a few days, I went and reread the transcript, only to realize I'd been hinting and nudging it along much more than I consciously thought at the time. I only remembered the answers that were the most impressive and forgot about the ones that missed the mark.

ChatGPT is really good at picking out the key ideas in the prompt and responding to them. It's really easy to inadvertently nudge it to give a certain type of response, which of course makes it feel all the more astounding when it gives you exactly the type of answer you already unconsciously expect.
No, some rando that comes across your comatose body in an alley isn’t your guardian.
Usually I listen to interviews based on the chemistry between the two. If either of them are bland, the entire thing gets thrown off balance.

If it's all about the guest, the perfect interview for you would be someone emailing the guest the questions so they can read them themselves, without involving a second person?
> If there is a magical way to gauge character in a short amount of time then sure

This is key. Many universities that claim to do "holistic reviews" don't have the time or resources to actually do holistic reviews. University of Washington is an example. UW gives application reviewers 8 minutes per application. And who are these reviewers? Do they have the knowledge and experience to do a "holistic review" in 8 minutes, including reading essays and personal statements and so on? Nope! They hire grad students, retirees etc. to act as application reviewers [1].

[1] https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/a-look-inside-admis...
I’m fully insured and have always been well taken care of in the United States health care system. Never wait more than 30 minutes if I were in an emergency room, and usually I’m attended to within 10-15. Doctors appointments are easy to get, never paid much for prescriptions.

If I was in a public system, I’d fear I’d be fighting for attention alongside the general public, so I’m not convinced it would be better.
Privacy isn't the only benefit of local compute, users also get colossal bandwidth, tiny latency, and high reliability.
Thank you, appreciate the time you took to reply.
As a Mathematics undergraduate I am not allowed by my university to officially take (and receive credit for taking) most non-beginner Computer Science courses, including Compilers. At least I'm allowed to attend the lectures and cram it in alongside my other pure math classes!
Who created the idea of an alpha? A human. It's a human word for a concept a human thought up. There's nothing biological or sociological to suggest it's even a real trope in animals. Even in mountain gorilla troops and other primates where there appears to be a single large adult male leading the group, it turns out from study that it's more of a profunctory role and the whole group is more involved with decisions. The idea of an alpha leader really comes more from human societies, as there's actual sociological evidence there, whereas with animals it usually comes down to a more mixed hierarchy.
They use a 1 to 3 percent strength ethanol solution. Also, when you say "poisonous" are you maybe thinking methanol? There's, uh, already pretty big business around getting people to ingest ethanol.
i find cats to be annoying, but i don't go around commenting that on cat videos
Is the set of all odd numbers smaller than the set of all even and odd numbers together? If not, then if you were to merge the set of all even numbers to the set of all odd numbers, did you really merge anything since the set didn't grow?
Where did it say they were incarcerated?
> Maybe it's all about context, I'm not sure

+100

For everyone the circumstances and relationship dynamics are different.

And it's kind of disheartening to read a well-intentioned comment, see people assuming their own completely different context and then getting slightly aggressive about it.
Meh. It's not particularly controversial so you're being overly dramatic.

I didn't force anyone, we had an adult conversation about it and all my gfs were on the same page. If any one of my gfs wanted to stay on contraceptives in the first place, then great, I would still do the exact same thing to avoid getting her pregnant in case she missed a day, etc. My wife wasn't on contraceptives in the first place so it was basically a non-conversation.

I think having an adult conversation is basic expectations for any healthy relationship. If you interpret broaching a subject as being cause for breaking up with someone... well, that's your prerogative.
What do you mean what took us so long? As far as I know, practically no country has fully banned TikTok. If you mean banned on government devices: firstly, the US did do that, just like the EU, and secondly, that’s not even the real problem (which is propaganda and
manipulating what media people constantly consume)

Has your country done a full TikTok ban?

Anyways, like the other comment said, this issue in America is less about do we trust China (a majority of people don’t) or do we want to be saints, and more about rights. Outright blocking an app (or website for that matter) at all is completely unprecedented in the US, as far as I know. And the second part is that TikTok is incredibly popular, which means banning it would be possibly ruinous for someone’s election chances.
Definitely, and many programs were highly selective, extremely rigorous, and had very high dropout rates. Some colleges just had vastly less demanding degrees and a reputation for wild parties, excessive drinking, etc.

I am mostly referring to the idea people have become less capable because fewer people know how to say repair their cars. Ignoring the fact cars just don’t break down as much and are also vastly more complicated today. So, basic car repair is both more difficult and less necessary.
You then vote or fight for your freedom. Nothing is bad about either.
Separatists movements don’t always start with oppression and grievances, they also start as a way to gain power, wealth or other benefits, be it individuals, groups or political parties.
Oh no, you don't know about ChatGPT plugins yet, and the trust some people have to let AI language models execute code.