skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I had thought about this a few years back. My final thought to avoid intervention from a human owner was that the company could be fully owned by a second company, which is then fully owned by the first. This chain would effectively remove the businesses from human ownership, and the AI would inherit the "personhood" of the business entities. I don't know where the legality is for such a thing.
On a laptop/PC you could give the rimgo[0] frontend a try for simple viewing, no uploading or interacting. It's by no means perfect but works really well in addition with the LibRedirect[1] browser extension.

Rimgo is basically a frontend for imgur that you can selfhost (or use a public instance). The LibRedirect browser extension automatically replaces the imgur.com URL with the specified rimgo instance.

So for example https://imgur.com/gallery/eMKxD6t turns into https://rimgo.pussthecat.org/gallery/eMKxD6t.

[0] https://codeberg.org/elttil/rimgo

[1] https://github.com/libredirect/libredirect
You can link the image without the "i" subdomain and it will redirect to the direct image.

eg: https://imgur.com/4clqUdj.jpg (picture of a cat)

since the traffic appear to come from the main domain to them, it does to redirect back to the html page.
It takes a LOT more calories to power a horse than a biker.
It probably would also help with investigations too. If Joe Bloggs tried to sign up to attack bobsforum.com, got warned off by one of these services, and then a couple weeks later bobsforum.com had an actual attack, they’re probably going to knock on Joe Bloggs’ door first.
It might not be intentional, but does anyone think that this article might be a well executed act of trolling?
where do you get that idea?

I spent 2 hours trying to fix an SSL issue on my webserver, neither stack overflow or my devops friends could figure it out.

GPT4 gave me the answer in 3 minutes. and without all the ego and gatekeeping.
> If the US fades, this unifying principle will disappear over time

Working, functional partnership do not dissolve easily. The Eu, despite all its problems is a good example. Even the US-controlled system was one - it had a lot of disadvantages, but it worked to some degree, and it kept going on.

BRICS and the analogues that are converging with it are multilateral, egalitarian partnerships that worked well for all their participants, totally independent of the US. Some favored US allies kept increasing their BRICS participation even while they got a lot of benefits from the US. So its unlikely that they would just leave.

To simplify, BRICS and its analogues seem to be what the WTO would be without the 'special rules based order' that the US was subjecting everyone to, and the blackmailing influence of the Anglosaxon dominated financial system. (as can be seen from what happened recently with 'sanctions' and the resulting confiscations of money).

That was the last straw actually, all the countries that are rushing to BRICS as of this moment, started those initiatives immediately after 'asset seizures', or, rather, theft, that was effected on their enemies by the US, the UK and the supposedly neutral Switzerland. The 'neutrality' was discovered to be a farce and the 'rules based order' discovered to be able to change its rules whenever, however it suit its rule-makers.

The result is everyone applying to BRICS membership or observer status...
I think GPT-3 is used as a benchmark for performance, so saying a model is on par with GPT-3 should give you an idea of what you can get out of it.

IIRC most open source models to date - including the semi-open LLaMAs - have GPT-3-like performance. Nothing gets close to GPT-3.5 and beyond.
I have a suspicion that good zero-shot performance is a good starting point for fine-tuning. If you have more than one intended high inference use case, or can imagine a couple of new ones on the horizon, it might still be best to not target the first use case directly.
Cambridge Analytica, Facebook, especially after the anti-abortion laws in the US, chlorofluorocarbon, fracking etc.
Common mistake: you are confusing energy and momentum, or power (rate of energy/work) and force (rate of momentum change). In fact, power at constant force is F.v (force time velocity), which solves your question.
We don't have any revenue, but it's not something we're currently focused on.
I never mentioned balloons. In any case, all of this is far above my pay grade.
This is the real deal!

If I ever saw an autarkic computer, this is it.

It can be scaled both up and down. It could be implemented with discrete components in a small room with air conditioning, or it could be made into an FPGA or ASIC.
100% up to you. All of my habits are different, but usually for me it’s something like “I did it / I did it well / I did it great”.
In one of the above comments I read that downplaying AI could be a coping strategy, for a typical - I've got things covered mentality - type of HN'er.

If that's the case, I think those, like most people, are taking the advancements seriously. I would say to those people: don't worry too much.

The impact will be big, but it doesn't have to mean people will not have a job anymore, the tools they use will be at another level.
Because our infrastructure isn't in much better shape, not since the EU all but forced privatization and the new owners focused more on shareholder returns than on maintenance.

We're living on borrowed time.
Who benefits from sex workers being marginalized?
Depends on which area of the country that you are in but along the southern border a lot of gangs bring in guns.

Then there is the fact that our incompetent government does things like Operation Fast and Furious (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal) and, no, the ATF using private businesses to funnel guns into the hands of people who would not otherwise be able to acquire them is not the same as firearms that were once legal.
Responsible lending is providing collateral and then taking out a loan against that collateral. Don't spend what you don't have. This is not that.
It doesn’t, but that’s a clever idea!
This sounds awful. I honestly don’t know my mom’s birthday and perhaps interestingly she doesn’t technically know it either. Papers lost (and probably made up) multiple times when her family fled her home and then country before ending up here.

And she definitely has a birthday on her driver’s license now, but I think she might have to look at it to make sure she got it right.
It's not in the used-by list as that's mainly meant to highlight communities that have a lot of activity as each one should be a good example and there aren't too many questions in my server yet
South Africa has a steadily growing GDP, and is one of the least corrupt countries in Africa. GDP has been growing steadily despite issues with the state owned energy provider Eskom. The private sector is robust against government incompetence. It’s not easy to live here, but the opportunities are massive (because the playing field is open if you are skilled).
You need to work directly with NXP. Our first big batch will be here in September. We could have had them earlier but there are plenty of different moving parts, things to do and software to write, so September is a good compromise.

But yes, the long lead time is the reason for the waitlist!
The poor domestic monetary policy is the equivalent of one or two fewer lifeboats but make no mistake: the end of the petrodollar is the iceberg.
Imo if you spend a little while using a shell like Xonsh or Ammonite, it becomes clear why the internal DSL approach is not as suitable for this as a new language that is designed with interactive shell usage in mind from the start. (Lisp-y languages might be a bit of an exception since command invocations are very close to the same thing syntactically anyway. But idrk since I've never tried using an internal DSL in a Lisp as a Unix shell.)

But sure, some people do use and love Xonsh, and you could make the case for using a Xonsh builder in this way as well.
Tickmate was something I used for a long time, but Google says it's too old for my Android. =(

https://github.com/lordi/tickmate
AI Effect [0] in action.

> The AI effect occurs when onlookers discount the behavior of an artificial intelligence program by arguing that it is not real intelligence.

> Author Pamela McCorduck writes: "It's part of the history of the field of artificial intelligence that every time somebody figured out how to make a computer do something—play good checkers, solve simple but relatively informal problems—there was a chorus of critics to say, 'that's not thinking'." Researcher Rodney Brooks complains: "Every time we figure out a piece of it, it stops being magical; we say, 'Oh, that's just a computation.'"

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect
> false positives... 10Mo URL crashes my Python interpreter? I'm ok with that.

Either you're wrong about the "false" part or you're testing the wrong entry point.

Fuzzing has a long warmup time but probably the lowest false positive rate of any testing technique - if it crashes you're wrong about some invariant, even if that's only "I need to fuzz parseX, not decodeX".
EV startup Lucid plans to lay off hundreds of workers
And its counterpart quote by Bill Gates, "Bicycles are like a computer for our legs."
> Also USians are used to it, so we don't complain :)

Go insane when a nipple shows on TV, but fine to almost see each other's parts in public.
Not OP, but reasons that are pretty easy to imagine:
- Living in America and suffering from either cancer, heart disease, or any chronic illness.
- Have any number of children and not having a family member available to care for them before they are of school age and after school from Kindergarten until whatever local laws permit for the child to be home alone for a few hours a day.
- Buying a home at the wrong time and taking an absolute bath on the "investment" once some unforseen circumstance forces you to sell the home while upside down on the mortgage.
- Experiencing various forms of fraud.
- Experiencing a lawsuit in America, whether you came out as the winner of said dispute or not.
- Being 50 and having had the poor but not unreasonable "luck" of having worked for the wrong start-ups in 1999, 2007, and 2022.

Those are just top of mind.
Alibaba to Split into 6 Companies
Thanks! Really appreciate it <3
I think ignoring comments and news stories in general on reddit is the best strategy
That's an inaccurate test. You can't know if the answer was real or stochastic parroting.

Any attempt at consciousness requires us to define the word. And the word itself may not even represent anything real. We have a feeling for it but those feelings could be illusions and the concept itself is loaded.

For example Love is actually a loaded concept. It's chemically induced but a lot of people attribute it to something deeper and magical. They say love is more then chemical induction.

The problem here is that for love specifically we can prove it's a mechanical concept. Straight people are romantically incapable of loving members of the same sex. So the depth and the magic of it all is strictly segmented based off of biological sex? Doesn't seem deep or meaningful at all. Thus love is an illusion. A loaded and mechanic instinct tricking us with illusions of deeper meaning and emotions into creating progeny for future generations.

Consciousness could be similar. We feel there is something there, but really there isn't.
> But over a long enough time scale, tech companies have to either turn a profit or disappear so there is at least some grounding in objective reality.

This is exactly what I'm talking about. The US Government subsidizes many industries, to the point where if those subsidies went away, those industries would not be profitable any longer (hence the subsidies). Yet, those industries, like say farming, are called the "real world" because they somehow I guess have a more objective interface with reality? It doesn't make sense.

Well here's some objective reality: as a society, as with food, we understand we have to teach people, and there's no profit in that. On the other side, students demand results, and we give them, and earn a reputation for delivering. Colleges that don't deliver go under, and new colleges are formed all the time, so it's not even accurate that there are no forcing functions or grounding in reality. That some universities have been around for a century or more is a testament to their success in the marketplace, not evidence they are immune from market forces.

And it's interesting that "profit" is always the measure used when one wants to prove that academia doesn't belong in this world. I mean, yeah, you're right. When you frame the world in terms of profit and loss, anything that makes a loss should just be done away with. Problem is then you end up in a world with no schools, hospitals, parks, community centers, museums, orchestras, art galleries, etc. In the real world, we need those things too.
They should introduce "Apple Pay Never" and make it so I can just buy stuff without paying for it at all.
I'm (genuinely) curious what kind of code you write. I haven't tried Copilot and I haven't used ChatGPT very much, but I feel I would be pretty surprised if either of them made significant improvements to my workflow.

Copilot I could see, since I already use Intellisense, autocomplete, and snippets to great effect. I'd be annoyed if I had to work without them. But in general, knowing what I want the code to do is >90% of the work of writing new code.

I feel there are a few possibilities for why I'm confused:

1. I'm not a very good software engineer, at least in certain respects. Maybe I should have a better understanding of architecture patterns or something I might have learned in a CS degree. Maybe I am hacking everything together and maybe I am already a slow coder.

2. I'm not [being] creative enough as a prompt engineer. I typically can't think of any way that ChatGPT could help me without ingesting my entire repo and figuring out the correct patterns. It could be, however, that there are ways to get the answers I need with better questions.

3. We do completely different kinds of work, and some kinds of coding are better suited for AI assistance than others.
You used the word "typically" in the last post, which isn't a very precise or confidence inducing word when dealing with something important to your life.
>>Only a brand-new app — with specialized features and a beautiful interface designed for the genre — could remove the complexity and make classical music easily searchable, browsable, and accessible for beginners and experts alike.

Just thinking out loud. Was there a need for a separate app music? Instead add a "classical mode" to the traditional apple music app that enables features for classical music lovers.
Working in the trust and safety / bad actors space, I imagine that bad actors realized fairly quickly they could just purchase 20 of their competitors products and then rate/write in saying they were damaged / fraudulent and trigger that andon button being falsely triggered.
*i.MX 8M Plus, please :-) The 8M Plus is not that different from the RPi4!

Yes, of course, this will be sold to anybody and be very, very competitive, like in the order of ~$550 including the Granita board ($100 less for GranitaLite).
And BRICS helps a lot. It’s great to have a trade partner like China. Not all exporters feel happy to export to Russia currently.
How are people defining agency? Because GPT-4 can have agency, it just needs to be put in specific situations to have that agency.

For example, I could theoretically hook up my Home Assistant instance to GPT-4 and run a script every 10 minutes telling GPT-4 the temperature and asking for a yes or no response to whether I should turn on the AC or heat. That sounds to me like the AI now has agency over the temperature in my home. You don't even need any real AI for this. Google's Nests have some algorithm that adjust temperature based off usage.

Is this not agency? Or is the author not counting agency without consciousness as agency?
Skill development is a sure shot way to transform a nation. Most developed countries have put crazy amount of effort to ensure skill development is done effectively. Developing nations like India are emulating the same model and ensuring skill development could solve the unemployability problem which could subsequently solve the unemployment crisis in the nation. But is it that simple or these are symptoms of a larger anomaly at play here. I call it the skill dimensional conundrum. Read the following blog to know more
I believe you only have this problem if your bike has gears based on a set of sprockets (different size chainwheels and a derailleur to move the chain from one to the other).

In Europe (Holland in particular), people ride single gear city bikes (or internally geared hubs) for decades without replacing chains or cogs. When you only have one chainring and one cog, they wear along with the chain, and it takes a very very long time to encounter problems.

It's when you have the sprocket cluster with multiple cogs that are not all wearing equally, that you get problems. Or often the problem on geared bikes doesn't appear until you replace your worn chain and the new chain no longer meshes well with the cogs worn to match the old chain.
> Impossible to comment without you providing specifics of the things that founders do that are so obviously wrong.

I don't find it impossible at all. One example that everyone knows is Theranos. Elizabeth Holmes was a know-nothing with total conviction -- exactly the kind of young person Paul Graham lionizes in his post. She dropped out of Stanford at 19 to found a medical equipment company! When tons of experts believed that the samples Theranos relied upon were too small to yield accurate results! Which turned out to be true!!

There are, of course, a handful of businesses that have done quite well and defied all expectations in the process. But they are the exception rather than the rule. Most startups fail, and it's not at all obvious that being completely sure of yourself despite (because of?) your ignorance is an advantage.
Only on flat smooth surfaces which are a relatively recent invention.
Take them on any natural environment and it falls very quickly below walking.
Dismiss it at your own peril. You'll get blindsided like you won't believe.

I've heard this sentiment before from a few people over the last few days, and they changed their tune very quickly once they actually looked into it.
>>Did you read the comment chain before jumping in?

You have not responded to a single question I made. I only assume because you have no arguments and are only interested in repeating ideological tropes.

>> My point is that capitalism didn't improve conditions for children, it made them in many ways worse by forcing both adults and children to work harder, and in worse conditions.

I don't think either us can imagine how hard life was before industrialization, but millions of people leaving the country side to work in the factories should give you some information what people prefer.

>>Your contention that we simply got rich enough that child labor went away is not based in any reality. "Lefitist" had to pass laws to stop capitalist from using child labor.

This is really devoid of historical reality. Did you know some communist countries had forced child labor?

>>Its a fight we are still fighting today. Child labor is so hot with capitalist right now.

I guess have fun fighting wind mills.
At least there are cryptographic functions backing cryptocurrency. It's not _as_ inaccurate as "serverless".
The fine article already mentions in the body and at the summary at the end that an Android client is planned but they have a small team so it will take time:

Wavelength is currently available only for iPhone, iPad, and Mac. An Android app is planned (see next item)
…
As mentioned above, Wavelength’s development team is very small. Two people, Henry and Patterson. That puts a limit on how much they can accomplish — hence the lack of an Android app at the moment.

Regardless, I don’t personally have any interest in this App at this time.
I'm literally smack dab inside of my city, but I still prefer WFH. My office was an "open" style hellscape that was a barely renovated parking garage, complete with harsh concrete and constant loud drilling work on said concrete, an HVAC system that was freezing in the fall and spring and never worked during the summer, High school cafeteria style """desks""", HVAC that meant you couldn't hear yourself think, meeting rooms that were annoying to use because we had a remote person on our team already, and coworkers constantly standing next to my desk having loud conversations with another person standing next to my desk.

Fuck anything that tries to portray WFH as some sort of laziness, or agoraphobia, or avoidance of travel. Home offices are expensive, mediocre, and mean I have to spend my personal fun time in exactly the same seat I work in, which is detrimental to my mental health.

But all of that is STILL better than the bullshit of working in what modern tech companies call "offices" because we were 5 years away from just being thrown into an empty gymnasium as our offices anyway, usually to just to penny pinch on the renovations of an office that costs ten times as much as it should because it's waterfront property that we never fucking needed as an ecommerce company!
The websites will offer PayPal and then email people who apply.

This is why we need a robust crypto system.

So that you can pay for whatever you want without worrying about giving away who you are.
Awesome! What are other reddit tricks like these?
When you see "modern" looking sites (with the font style, ui orientation, etc) and it feels more disorienting than old reddit (more text, cleaner beaks between section, etc) its bc the new site is catering to mobile view ports, not just desktop.

Old reddit is great on desktop, but new reddit looks more like an app.
That brings up a lot of hard questions. Supposing you had that AI but didn't allow it to churn in the background when not working on a problem. Human brains don't stop. They constantly process data in both conscious and unconscious ways. The AIs we've built don't do that. The meaning of the concept of "self" for a human is something a huge percentage of their thoughts interact with directly or indirectly. Will an AI ever develop a similar concept if it never has to chew on the problem for a long period?
If I saw that page (and the screenshot is accurate), I would assume it's fake. It looks like a fake ad straight out of the mid 00's. Those "The FBI has your location" type ads.
Thanks for pointing that out! The robots.txt file was in the location, that got messed up a bit in the move over the open source version but is fixed now

For the weekly changefreq on Discord server url, are you arguing that's too frequent or too infrequent? On the server page, it has recently indexed questions so part of the reasoning behind that being weekly is to capture those recently indexed questions https://www.answeroverflow.com/c/143867839282020352

Archived threads get a change freq of monthly since they don't change that often and active threads have a changfreq of daily as there is lots of activity going on in them
The point of those smaller models is for the "Cerebras Scaling Law for Compute-Optimal Training" which is the straight line plot in the image at the top of their webpage when you click the link.

They want you to think it's reasonable that because the line is so straight (on a flops log scale) for so long, it could be tempting to extrapolate the pile-loss consequences of continuing compute-optimal training for larger models beyond their largest 13B one, with the obvious caveat that the extrapolation can't continue linearly much further if for no other reason than the test loss isn't going to go below zero (it will flatten out sooner than that).

If you trained beyond compute-optimality on smaller models, it would mess up their straight line and make it look like we are sooner hitting diminishing returns on test loss.