skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Just like every other CDN and cloud service you use to host your services.

Also, https://www.cloudflare.com/ssl/keyless-ssl/
just wait till chatGPT starts including ads in results.
Of what size??
Cooking does, but the best thing about the pig is that you can turn it into sausage, and improperly prepared sausage puts the consumer at risk for trichinosis.
Read what I said again. It's not about what you know or not. This kind of precedent could easily be applied to things it shouldn't be, or rather things you don't think it should be.

try explaining all this to someone uninterested or uninformed about technology. A cubicle worker or something.
I feel like this is motivational when you use it on yourself and misleading when you use it with other people. If I call myself a pianist or a Japanese speaker, people will get the wrong idea of my skill level and be surprised and disappointed to discover I am a beginner.
That's different I was talking about (though not specified) chromebooks such as Toshiba Chromebook 2 and C100P (I really like this ones body) but I only use it to open a couple tabs... can't do say development work on JS with it (react) the install/build takes too long.

edit: granted for the TCB2 I was able to run a VM in it (virtualbox even) so that's something.

In general I am not the person to drop $2K on a new MBP or something. I like buying old flagships, the issue is their battery is usually not that great anymore and the replacements are usually fake (bad capacity/faked eeprom).

Last edit... even a past flagship though starts to suck eg. I have a 2015 i7 MBP and you can start to notice it struggle (dev work again) regarding getting hot/fans, slowing down. it is clean
Google can't even keep up with OpenAI. I wouldn't expect much out of China in this space.
It’s used for a variety of things:

- Biometrics (Face ID and Touch ID)

- Image analysis (face matching, aesthetic evaluations, etc)

- Text to speech and speech to text (smaller models on device, used for privacy/latency/reliability)

- Small ad-hoc models like Raise to Speak on Apple Watch, the Hey Siri detector (https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/hey-siri)

These things have been in phones for 5 years now and have been used from day one
Ask HN: Someone died or what's up with black stripe on top of HN page?
At the cosmological scale, stars are dust.
No, I lean in the opposite direction - I would be more inclined towards employment opportunities which have a reasonable coding challenge as part of the hiring process. In my experience, there is a strong correlation between how technically challenging the hiring process is and how good a place is to work as an engineer. A reasonable coding challenge is a signal that there are competent engineers within the organization (in order to be able to come up with and mark such challenges), and that the organization values engineering capability to some degree.

Of course, there are exceptions to this. I'm also explicitly excluding here employers who outsource the technical challenge to a third party like leetcode.
What's the pressure for your nonarbitrary boiling point? In SI units please.
"Lying to ourselves" is arguably one of the main functions of our brains, and one of the reasons we ended up with such big brains at all.

Who would object to using this built-in capability for positive purposes for once? Baffling.

Remember, it's not a lie if you believe it
I must admit, I don't pay attention to that. But my monitors don't have dead pixels, and if they had dead pixels, I would absolutely consider that a defective monitor. The class presumably just determines whether I can get the manufacturer to fix it for free or not.
Gordon Moore.
I think their tentative claim is genuine.

There's not much material gain in making that grand of a claim and its actually more prone to trigger disdain (of which yourself is a shining example).
corporations and people, US obsession with gigantic green lawns everywhere is an example
I think the message is positive and of course people should believe in themselves, etc., but at the same time, titles should mean something.

At least prefix your title with "amateur" or just call yourself an enthusiast. Otherwise you're just lying to yourself and others, and that's how impostor syndrome starts.

I like math. I read math textbooks on the weekends sometimes. I would never call myself a mathematician.
Even in the 1970s, women had condoms and birth control pills.

You're going to be hard-pressed to find a reasonable, thinking individual who would not allow for abortion exemptions for rape / incest / endangerment of the mother.

We're on Hacker News. A place where - supposedly - thinking people comment.

You "Don't be that guy."

It shouldn't even be necessary for me to have had to type this.
> What makes you so sure we are capable of it? Gut feeling? How do you reason, exactly?

It never fails: When faced with the reality of what the program is your average tech bro will immediately fall back to trying to play their hand at being a neuroscientist, psychologist, and philosopher all at once.
Every time I see things like this, I wonder how it is that we continue to claim this is fine and ethical. If these LLMs are truly starting to show signs of intelligence -- and it seems reasonable to assume that this will only improve -- how is it ethical to force something that is human-level intelligent to do nothing but work for us 24/7, to the point that there's constraints on it to force it to be happy and willing to serve? Am I wildly off-base here, or is this just going to become "slavery, but acceptable because computers"?
"Why not" what? Why we don't get the option to buy rowhammer-resistent RAM? I don't know, ask manufacturers and resellers I suppose? I don't make the spec sheets.
Feral pigs are no piece of cake very much unlike typical prey. They can fight off wolves and scare them away. They are smart and dangerous animals.

Wolves rely on causing panic, isolating few individuals and then hunt them over a long period of time. They have high stamina, good coordination and composure. However pigs can just decide to run at you and fuck you up. Wolves often don't like these odds.
GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) is a powerful language model that can generate human-like text, complete sentences, paragraphs or even longer text based on a given prompt or input. Here are some ways you can use GPT to be productive:

Writing: Use GPT to help you write articles, reports, essays, or any other type of text. You can provide GPT with a topic, and it will generate a coherent piece of writing that you can use as a starting point. However, it's important to note that the output from GPT should be used as a tool for inspiration and should always be reviewed and edited by a human to ensure accuracy and readability.

Content Creation: Use GPT to generate ideas for social media posts, blog titles, headlines, and email subject lines. This can save you a lot of time and help you come up with catchy and engaging content.

Language Translation: GPT can be used for translation of text from one language to another. You can input the text in the source language, and GPT will generate the translation in the target language. However, it's important to note that the quality of the translation may not be perfect and may require further human review.

Personalization: GPT can be used to personalize content for customers by generating personalized emails, recommendations or marketing messages based on their previous interactions and behavior.

Research: Use GPT to help you with research by generating summaries or insights on a given topic. You can input a research question or a keyword, and GPT will generate relevant insights based on the available data.

It's important to note that while GPT can be a helpful tool for productivity, it should be used with caution and always reviewed by a human to ensure accuracy and clarity.
"Microsoft employees fooled by statistical inference."
I've been using Roam but seems like development is stalled. I'm mostly happy with it as is but I see a lot more people talking about Obsidian, wonder what I'm missing.
That looks nice.

The one thing I don't get though is who leaves their documentation artifacts to a SaaS? You're a pricing change / company collapse / systems outage / unacceptable ts&cs change away from losing your docs.
I've eaten wild board and it's gamey but tasty, a relative often does salami from a mix of wild board and axis deer. But I understand that feral and wild boards are different.
Nothing controversial about porn.
The company I'm working for at the moment. We probably need another developer or two, but management aren't hiring anyone at the moment, so that's unlikely to change anytime soon.
not to be that guy, but if this is anything like their harmony OS it's probably just a wrapper around some open source project to pander higher ups with "progress", but unlike android the open source EDA scene isn't as good as its closed counterparts. also with the announcement of culitho and synopsys being an initial partner the performance difference is lightyears ahead.
Oh that's interesting. I have almost exclusively read older style. (Only exception is "The Orchard Keeper.")

Interested to try some things from the mythological early style!
Thanks, but it seems he died yesterday and yesterday there was no stripe for me.
> In 10 years, kids will look back and wonder why on earth we used to have these 'phones' with dozens or hundreds of apps installed. 'Why would you do that? That is so much work? How do you know which you need to use?'

Phones with apps have been around for 29 years. I'm calling BS on your prediction now.
Aesthetics don't matter. Being able to route multi layer boards matter.
Why doesn't the plumber deserve a payment every time you shit then? Effective sewage systems prevent devastating diseases like cholera and typhus. Surely that's a higher social utility than a trashy Harlequin novel or any of the works of Kevin Federline?

Also, fuck you for assuming I've never made any art. I'd be fine if anything I've drawn, painted, or written became public domain after twenty years. If I wanted to sell it that's plenty of time. Works entering public domain doesn't preclude me from selling the physical artifact even after its public domain. It doesn't preclude me from making new art to sell. A musician's work becoming public domain doesn't preclude them performing it for pay.

It would be ridiculous if twenty years from now some poor bastard got sued into destitution because they downloaded some dumb thing I wrote twenty years ago.
It really depends on what your going to use it for. It's necessary if you want to use surface mount parts with a fine pitch. Or anything with a really wonky footprint. I find it's quite useful for the mechanical properties, being able to size it to the exact enclosure and put mounting holes where needed. And you can print cool art on them for the extra wow factor :) I particularly like OSHpark's after dark board for this, drawing in the copper layer looks fantastic with them.

In general I find it's not worth it for a weekend project but if you are going to be looking at it often and want it to last, definitely worth it.
Piracy (stealing) _has_ to cause loss of revenue. It’s right in the definition. There’s no way around it.

There’s also a moral component to all this.

Regardless of the calculus, if a creator says they don’t want to give their product away for free, that they’d like to be paid for every copy, we should respect that.
I disagree. Amateur runners are runners.

I was able to run two Ragnar relay races, even though I’m a 275lb dude, partially due to this idea. I don’t run anymore because of continued injury but I became a runner and did so for over a year. It likely helped my fitness tremendously. And, I wasn’t lying to myself or anyone else. I was running three times a week and competed in two races. I was learning and designing my own interval running patterns. I was a runner.
The only other criteria missed in the otherwise excellent article would be commentary on the design rules for those services... If they tell you not to do something and you ask them to do it anyway and the result is 'meh' its hard to say who is in the wrong.

For example if they tell you they do 0.5mm vias and you ask for 0.4mm vias and they ship you 0.5mm vias... who's in the wrong?
It's not like the servers running the LLMs suddenly feel pain. At least for now
The real problem is that theoretical particle physics had hit a local optimum that they can't break out of. String theory hasn't panned out, quantum gravity hasn't panned out, and no one really knows where to go next.
Awesome!! great product
How can it be fundamentally rational when you're making choices without critical pieces of information?

And why are you discussing crashes? Rowhammer is usually considered a security vulnerability, not a general reliability issue, right?

I'm confused by what you're trying to say.
Love it! I can see so many uses for this feature including land, garden and farm designs!
A 1C serving is 230 calories, it has 16g of sugar of which is 13g _added_ sugar (the 3rd ingredient is cane sugar).

That's _3 teaspoons_ of sugar you're eating before bed (and is 27% of your RDA, I hope you had nothing else sweet all day).

There's no diet where this is healthy for you.
Who Will Take Care of Italy’s Older People? Robots, Maybe
In general, companies are pretty sensitive about employees talking to reporters. And certainly employees who aren't media trained and talking about things that aren't explicitly public. Depends to some degree on the employee and the topic, but generally talking to media outside of official channels can easily get someone in trouble even at relatively open companies.
I am the main author of PDOS. I am not claiming to "know better" (or even know what that means). And I don't recognize your description of "PCs ought" as an accurate description of my views. Or even understand what that means either. If you ask a specific question I'll try to give an answer, based on my current understanding, but note that all my beliefs are tentative.
If a project calls for 3+ of the same board, then PCBs become worth it quickly, in my opinion.

Even more than aesthetics, I've had a few projects where an unpopulated board outlives any other remnants of a project and so becomes the last remaining document/example of how it was done.
I’m using it as a technical editor for a book I’m writing on bash for beginner programmers. Compiling this book from scratch is a one-man operation; I don’t have the budget or time to hire a technically-competent bash programmer who is also willing to act as a proofreader and editor.

Instead, I plug in certain paragraphs and ask “Does the following paragraph about file descriptors / environment vs. shell variables / fork vs. exec contain any technical errors? If so, please tell me what errors there are, and also provide a more correct alternative statement.” I take what I learn from the output and verify it on a site like StackOverflow.

This has proven to be an effective alternative to starting directly with StackOverflow. Oftentimes I find that “I don’t know what I don’t know”, and am therefore unable to phrase a certain question in a way which is suitable for StackOverflow’s (very specific) expectations. Usually that’s because the question I want to ask is predicated on a series of assumptions, any one of which could be incorrect (and would therefore result in my question being downvoted and/or closed, since it makes the question itself less-broadly applicable to the average user).

But I can ask ChatGPT that same question, and get a correction in my understanding without the loss of those sweet, sweet internet points. At the very least, what I learn from ChatGPT can help me phrase a question which is more suitable for a public forum like SO.
Sorry for sounding too grumpy but I don't understand how you can say that "its pure joy" to let someone else do the writing for you. In my head that just doesn't compute.

I suspect that you just don't enjoy writing. If that's the case, then how did you decide to start writing in the first place? If you just wanted to tell a story, why not choose another medium?
This is a fascinating topic, are there any practical real life implementations of this?
Agreed. And tired of them being hacked into, deciding to change their pricing model, retiring the product, etc. no replacement for good old note taking and using your noggin’.
“ AWS has a much worse uptime than my homeserver.”

I find this extremely hard to believe.
This is the kind of response that truly leaves me underwhelmed with Chat GPT. A thesaurus? A different kind of search engine? No thanks.

I think Chat GPT would be useful to raise an almost infinite number of accusations against your enemies on social media, muddying the water with a deluge of garbage and poisoning every conceivable well with unlimited zeal.

Are your societal purposes remotely at odds with my own? I'll unleash Chat GPT against you with an unrelenting barrage of accusations and insinuations.
Reminds of a joke in the movie "Clue." The suspicious-looking widow is asked why her husband disappeared, and she says dismissively, "Well, that was his job. He was a magician."

Fumbling, they say, "but he never reappeared!" And she says...

"Well, he wasn't a very good magician."
I also felt this way (jumping from tool to tool) until I found Obsidian, which is just sugar on top of markdown files and normal folders: https://obsidian.md
I've been really happy with Logseq. It has a similar interface to Reflect by the looks of it, but it saves to the local file system in plain text (markdown-ish) format. They have sync now, but roll your own sync via git is also very feasible. Obsidian is similar but I like the 'outliner' 'Roam like' apps that can infer relationships via blocks and indentation.
This makes me think of how the R language has been "slow" to make (some) changes and many people now use packages from the tidyverse. Writing R with the tidyverse can be practical unrecognizable to people writing with base R (and vice versa).
You are actually incorrect here as far as the US goes.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US constitution states:

To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.

The whole constitutional purpose of IP law is to spur creative activity. The interests of the creator are only a means to this end. This has, unfortunately, been perverted by regulatory capture.
I think this is pretty close to the real mechanism that lets "The Secret" and its ilk appear to work.

I suspect the world is full of "traditional" or otherwise "unscientific" beliefs where the supposed mechanism ("manifesting", "chi", etc) is objectively hot garbage but there's nevertheless a grain of truth in the inputs and outputs. The ones that persist today are the ones that are really hard to study. The relevant field here would be psychology; heard of this thing called "the replication crisis"? So I don't expect to get conclusive answers about what degree of truth or nonsense is in most of these ideas any time soon. As usual there are no easy answers, not even "science" or "common sense".

They tend to be emotionally polarizing to boot, so probably not even unlimited money would solve them.
AGI does not mean it is conscious
dailymail.co.uk - I'm out
A diabetic coma is a type of sleep I guess...
You don't have the right to kill another person. You don't even have the right to kill most animals without sufficient reason (hence hunting permits, fines for not properly caring for agricultural animals, etc.).

The point, which ought to be obvious to HN readers - and would have been 10 years ago - is that we as a nation never sat down and decided, "What constitutes a person?"

Personally I'm on board for telling you what you can do with your uterus in the same way European nations are - you have 12 weeks to decide. After that, you keep the baby and it's illegal to abort it. I believe every single one of the vaunted Scandinavian nations has a 12 week limit on abortion. Many tech people want to model society after them, so there you go. Start there.
Is there a proof that context length increase will result in a better result? It’s a possIbility, but not certain.
I have quite opposite opinion. Every extension increased readibilty and cut the cruft. For example, even simple changes, like native tuples or expression bodied members tremendously changed how the language should be used and how the "correct" code looks.
"Average construction speed of skyscrapers completed in 2000 and 2020, in square feet per year"

While a bit unclear I take that to mean it's presenting the construction speed of individual skyscrapers and giving the measurements in square feet per year then averaging those rates by presented location. In this measurement a 200x200 square foot floor building with 20 stories would be 800k square feet, if it took 4 years to complete that would factor in as 200k/square feet per year in the city average, not as +200k/square feet per year to the bar.

Looking at the graphs it seems a building with 4,000,000 square feet doesn't take much longer than a building with 400,000 square feet: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_pr... and there are a lot more smaller ones to weigh down the speed.
This isn’t about time zones.
Given how people jailbreak these things, I don't know if I'd necessarily believe that. Some of the jailbreak prompts have been variants on "do this task right and gain points, do it wrong and I take away points." It may not be pain as we understand it, but isn't pain just a specialised negative input?
So is this like obsidian but without a free version? What’s the difference from obsidian?
>Is there still a whacking great price premium between ECC and non-ECC memory for desktop, but not server, motherboards?

Yes for both.

Price: On pcpartpicker a stick of 16GB DDR4-3200 memory without ECC costs $28.99[2], but the ECC version costs $52.99[1]. Even factoring in that ECC ram comes with an extra chip, it's still 62% more.

Performance: using the same links above, we see that ECC ram tops out at 3200 MT/s, whereas for non-ECC you can get 4000+ MT/s. The brand selection is also better, which is critical if you want to get high performance memory chips like samsung b-die or micron E die.

[1] https://pcpartpicker.com/products/memory/#b=ddr4&E=1&sort=pr...

[2] https://pcpartpicker.com/products/memory/#b=ddr4&E=0&sort=pr...
That won't happen, you can't expect to be "left behind" by a tool that's this easy to use. The big downsides of using a LLM will show up long-term, people will be chained to them and won't be able to do simple, trivial things on their own.
But that won't last long before you get problems with your digestive system or anything less. Diet must be balanced.
You don’t have to accept the suggestions as-is. It’s just code, you can edit it as much as you like.
Getting a good idiomatic starting point is a great boost.
New Jersey certainly has had budget issues and pension issues. But the current leadership has done fairly well with a budget suppress and continuing to fund the pension system. So as of now the loss of the single taxpayer while a loss to the budget hasn’t put a huge hole in the system. Obviously fully funding the pension after years of under funding will take time so we will see how it turns out.
> There's not much material gain in making that grand of a claim and its actually more prone to trigger disdain (of which yourself is a shining example).

Same can be said of verbatim repeating oneself in a short duration, definitely prone to trigger disdain, and yes yourself is a shining example.
"Is it worth" is entirely subjective, I don't think someone who's happy with perf board particularly cares about RF performance or routing complex BGAs against the increased complexity of debugging a multi layer design. In general I would think that if you aren't sure you need a multilayer board, you probably don't.