skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Make an alias to Keychain access. Name it "Passwords" and have that a directory that is indexed by Spotlight (the Utilities directory under Applications where Keychain Access is found works fine).

This will then show up in the launchpad. https://i.imgur.com/IRPOMC5.png

Searching for 'pass' in Spotlight does bring up Keychain access - as that's in the apps list of Keywords... however the list of apps is way down on the scrolling https://i.imgur.com/KFUC0G0.png - it found 'password' as a string in 100 python files that I had to scroll through first.
I can't handle coffee anymore :(

Please invent a drink that is like it but not as toxic.
Apple Music started its life as Beats IIRC, so a good cross-plat UX was part of the acquisition. See also Shazam.
This is one of the reasons Databricks created Dolly, a slim LLM that unlocks the magic of ChatGPT. A homegrown LLM that can tap into/query the datasets of all the data in an organizations Data Lakehouse will be hugely powerful.

I am working with customers that are looking to train a homegrown LLM that they host and have blocked access to ChatGPT.

https://www.datanami.com/2023/03/24/databricks-bucks-the-her...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35288063
12 steps to Better Tests
Madoff was also chairman of the NASDAQ for a hot minute there heh.
Consider adopting an unofficial Matrix, Mattermost, Signal, or Discord room "for the express purpose of the lol's" (but also your venting about Pointy-haired boss).
How to host apps on AWS (SSL, custom domain, database) for free – full guide
> Google takes your data and sells it. Literally making your data available to the highest bidder.

But it doesn't, does it? It sells the fact that it knows everything about everyone and can get any ad to the perfect people for it. It's not going on the open market and telling people I regularly buy 12 lbs of marshmallow fluff and then use it in videos I keep on my google drive.
What about not having a personal vehicle at all?
So, what's your plan?
It’s a name in this context. Why would they not use someone’s name? To avoid using an obscure slur that no one’s heard of?
Problem
There are too many complicated platforms and systems that are needed for every member to use in an organization. Not only is it frustrating to have to navigate between 5+ different systems for communication, training, reporting, event management, task management, contact management, etc.... it's also challenging to every member to organize and use those systems effectively because they are disconnected and not integrated. Plus, any intranet system that may solve this problem is too expensive or restricted in solutions for everyone in a large organization to use.

My friend and I wanted to solve this problem and I would love your feedback!
We created an integrated digital ecosystem called Engage Spaces. Our goal was to solve the problem I described above; we wanted a single platform where everyone could be engaged and collaborating together.

I would love for you to check out what we've created and to provide feedback!
Part of this seems like some of the wonky design that seems to be under the hood of Drive. Just looking around at how rclone has to do things, the difference between shared and individual drives, the fact I couldn't even originally find a way in the console to see my shared drive usage (even though I was the owner of it and it was on my account) it just seems like there is a very very wonky odd design to how the system works. Not like an object store under the hood with a layer of "document" logic applied, but rather what started as initially some API-esque thoughts on document storage that grew into a monstrosity. I wouldn't be shocked if there's just a ton of tech debt there.
I don't have any inside knowledge, but in case you didn't already know Hollywood is famous for, to put it charitably, 'unusual' accounting practices [1].

Maybe the authorities chase after some of the cases, but as far as I can tell the status quo remains sketchy AF.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting
clicking this link throws a bunch of warnings in my browser, and my university internet blocks me from seeing the actual website :(
> Humans have done some cool things to conquer our basic nature and environment, and we continue to do cool things. Compared to other species we are absolutely killing it. Yes we suck compared to what we are going to be in the future, but that's the point!

At the same time it's important not to forget humans have done some messed up things to the environment that are not easy to clean up or undo. And they still do, all with a paltry goal to make a short term profit. This is what drives my optimism away, though I am not a pessimistic person by nature.
Find one with a middle eastern or “Mediterranean” focus. You’ll not only find plenty of fresh dates but a wide selection of nuts too.
I’d be interested to see some numbers that specifically keep that in mind. I suspect that flash drives suffer when they start to get full.
The quoted budgets for films don't include marketing. I believe that's because that cost actually belongs to the distributor, not the producer of the film. A rule of thumb is that a big-budget movie or game has a marketing budget roughly equal to it's production budget apparently.
My wife and I started Turning Red and Turned it Off halfway through. I haven't even tried the others.

Favorites in our place with the kids are Cars and Planes (though more Cars lately). We're on an old musicals kick lately, and it's just fun watching some of the big budget musicals from the 60s - when they wanted to get a whole street of people dancing, they went out and got a bunch of people trained to dance in the street. They also were a good bit longer, and generally had more room to breathe. The story didn't feel rushed at the end like a lot of the more modern one do (Encanto is a particular offender here, as far as I'm concerned).
This is not exactly how imperialism works. The export of American culture is the most massive export of culture humanity has experienced. It is simply unavoidable in the West.
> iCloud Passwords is a Chrome extension for Windows users…
> their mobile aspirations have failed

Their mobile aspirations were a walled garden because they wanted in on one of the ecosystems that was good for them at the expense of developers and users. I'm convinced that Microsoft would have a large share of the mobile market today if they would have tried to create a product that was good for users and developers instead of a product that was good for Microsoft.
> Yeah, this is super fucking weird. You'd think this would be connected in some fashion to "keychain", but nope.

Other browsers used to be able to use it. I do think it’s a really thorny issue—“allow this application to access all saved passwords?” is a pretty damn scary permission to include. Up there with the “allow this application to control your computer” permission that is used for accessibility apps (which apps can abuse to read passwords, if I understand correctly).

Apple’s tradition. Make the platform more secure, add an exception for first-party apps, and let the other browsers fuck off.
We saw these same fears with the release of Gmail. Why would you trust your email to Google?!! Aren't they going to train their spam filters on all your data? Aren't they going to sell it, or use it to sell you ads?

Corporations constantly put their most sensitive data in 3rd party tools. The executive in the article was probably copying his company strategy from Google docs.

Yes, there are good reasons for concern, but the power of the tool is simply too great to ignore.

Banning these tools will go the same way as prohibition did in the US, people will simply ignore it until it becomes too absurd to maintain and too profitable to not participate in.

Companies which are able to operate without these fears will move faster, grow more quickly, and ultimately challenge companies restricted to operate without.

Now I think the article should be a wake-up call for OpenAI. Messaging around what is and what is not used for training could be improved. Corporate accounts for Chat with clearer privacy policies would be great and warnings that, yes, LLMs do memorize data and you should treat anything you put into a free product on the web as fair game for someone's training algorithm.
The intention for this playground was to let people try the model. We actually have auto moderation on the user facing platform (https://play.ht/) and malicious text gets blocked and the user get flagged.
I've been building websites for 10+ years as well, and I can't tell you how many hours I've wasted on workaround to make something trivial work in Safari that required no work in other browsers. I've also run into some pretty gnarly animation performance issues over the years.

That being said, Apple has clearly upped the focus on the browser in the last two years, and they are shipping a ton more features and fixes in each update, so kudos to them for refocusing as of late.
It was never the happiest place on earth for a lot of the non-creative types. No idea how the creatives at Disney felt.

For instance, they used to have unpaid interns do full days at theme parks in-character and people would fly all the way from Australia for that privilege because, you know, you get to be Peter Pan for a summer.

It's sort of the same experience as Amazon. If you're a customer, it's the greatest thing ever. If you're an employee, not so much.
The built-in webkit is used extensively in apps. Tying it to the OS release makes testing and development a whole lot easier.
I ain’t publishing any utility apps for free if I have to pay. I have made plenty of utility websites I use as Home Screen apps though, all without ads.
>Disney workers used to make magic, now they struggle to make ends meet

Savage.
Aren't decentralized exchanges unable to handle real money? And therefore somewhat (if not completely) useless for the purposes of buying and selling crypto-currencies?
So you block internet access for all employees? Cos anything you think is being pasted into ChatGPT is being pasted everywhere, whether its Google, Slack, Chrome Plugins, public Wifi.
This is an interesting and open question. But I need you to be slightly more specific. In my research? For my personal life? For the global economy?
No, a 486 emulator that I installed Windows on, and "installed" an ATI Rage series "card" into, and didn't even have to look around for a driver CD, because Windows just kinda found it.

And don't make assumptions about me, our 1996 toshiba came with OSR2, including beta USB drivers and more built in driver profiles for commodity hardware than the plug and play "pick device" window actually could handle (it wasn't resizeable!)

By the time of OSR2, and then 98, if your device had been reviewed in a PC magazine, you could probably just plug it in, select it from a list, and go on your way.
I think there's something to be said for allowing things to be inferred during rapid development that need to be pinned down before publishing, but once you've removed the technical barrier there's a big question of how you make sure the social side of it stays healthy.
Your earlier comment generalises a bit too far though. Some early christians is not the same as early Christianity. Interesting fact nonetheless.
I don't believe any of those have been Disney, though...
Ted Cruz and Ron DeSantis take on the ‘digital dollar’
While a 5 million file limit sounds reasonable at first glance, it isn't just the free tier that is affected. Google Drive also sells storage plans for up to 30 TB for an individual user, and there is no mention of such a limitation anywhere on any plan. If I bought and actually wanted to use that 30 TB (or heck even 5 TB), it isn't unreasonable to want to store a few million files. Regardless of the technical reasons behind it, not mentioning this restriction up front is before the sale is inexcusable.
And AWS Rights Management is the pinnacle of this approach.
Personally, layoff carries the connotation that it is not the employee's fault while "fired" means the employee's performance was the cause.

Depend on the context, it may make a difference.
The project has interesting approach to UI: differences between GUI and CUI (aka console user interface) are almost erased.
It's called signing.

I send you a bunch of bytes signed with my private key (which somehow you have to verify in a trusted way) and you can be sure that I am the person who signed those bytes (unless I was compromised).
How do you keep popcorn warm without it burning?
Well, with the exception of AWS, unless something has changed recently — they notoriously only support one second factor (i.e. if you use YubiKeys or similar, you can only use one).
Oh, enough to improve things several times (to answer, 5 decades). People did some improvements, but clearly didn't keep-up with the times (and degraded some things too, UB being the elephant in the room).

But large things almost never keep-up with the times.
It also wouldn't matter much to me if developers could upgrade. What I would want is for users of my app to be able to upgrade when prompted.

Fortunately the cutoff I've chosen for my current project isn't that bad - 15.4. It means some iPhone users won't be able to use it. Eventually I'll feel OK about requiring 16.4. But I second the request for being able to install a new version without upgrading the whole OS.
How did it cost $175M to make Turning Red?
I want to share a personal experience with GPT-4 and other AI tools that has helped me a lot, given my recently acquired physical disability.

My creative and critical thinking are still in great shape, but I've been struggling to execute my ideas because of my physical limitations. For example, I used to paint as a way to deal with traumatic experiences, but that's no longer possible for me.

I got depressed and frustrated, being no longer able to transfer traumatic memories out of my head.

I found a workaround using Stable Diffusion and ChatGPT. By doing this, I can recreate my paintings in my own style without having to physically paint them. It's now part of my weekly routine and has been a real support for my therapy and PTSD.

Another thing GPT-4 has helped me with is managing anxiety attacks. I'm not good at coding, it's simply a skill I'm not good at, but with some assistance from GPT-4, I made a simple browser game using HTML, CSS, and JS. This game is now my go-to distraction when I feel anxious and is easily accessible on my phone.

GPT-4 has also made everyday tasks, like writing letters or emails, a bit easier for me. I can shave off a few minutes here and there that way each day, which is a lot of time I can do stuff I enjoy if you add them up over a year or longer.

While these benefits may not seem groundbreaking to everyone, especially if you're healthy, they've made a significant difference in my life and for me personally, and I think that is remarkable.

I'm also not good at asking other people for help, especially for stuff I managed to do on my own for all my life.

So if I can ask AI Tools to do stuff for me instead of taking up a friend's lifetime, it helps me to keep a sense of independence and being able to take care of myself.
> Possibly I don’t know how this all works, but I think if the host of a ChatGPT interface were willing to provide their own API key (and pay), they could then provide a “service” to others (and collect all input).

Well, GP was referring to blocking ChatGPT as a federal contractor. I suspect that as a federal contractor, they are also vetting other people that they share data with, not just blocking ChatGPT as a one-off thing. I mean, generic federal data isn’t as tightly regulated as, say, HIPAA PHI (having spent quite a lot of time working for a place that handles both), but there are externally-imposed rules and consequences, unlike simple internal-proprietary data.
One take on that idea:
https://github.com/jkcfg/jK
I mean, the new movies and shows in general aren't very good, but I'm surprised how good Bluey is. I think I like it better than my kids.
That's not really the point. If you're using an arena it means that you plan to reset it at some point and erase in bulk everything that was stored on it all at once. This is the opposite of letting the destructor of every object run.
We have been seeing some of these genuine use cases: youtube creators, audiobooks, elearning videos, podcasts, commercials, dubbing, and gaming.
No, it's more like those "stress tester" services that you're definitely-certainly-fingers-crossed supposed to only point at your own servers.

Sure, this is marketed as generating your own voice to read scripts for you YouTube channel, but are they actually verifying who's voice you're generating?
Glad I work for a company where the CEO pays for everyones ChatGPT Plus for the devs. If you think your code is special then you're wrong.
That's interesting. But I think it's a mistake to focus on relying on price to prevent abuse at scale. The use case for abuse of this technology is in highly targeted frauds, not broad-spectrum scams like insurance robocalls. Additionally, this will be zero deterrent to deep-pocketed actors like political action committees that generate fakery to influence elections and the like.

I'm trying not to be reflexively dismissive, and I know the technology is evolving so fast that your individual company can't necessarily pre-empt it, any more than an email software supplier is responsible for the existence of phishing. But I work adjacent to the security space (studying violent extremists) and I can think of a ton of ways to abuse this where economics would be absolutely zero deterrent.
Webb's coronagraphs reveal exoplanets in the infrared
The wild thing is that you can just annotate the content with the associated organization information then ask GPT to tell you what it sees in the logs.
When you say "black electrical tape" do you mean from, say, Harbor Freight, or from 3M? Since the 3M stuff blocks UV fairly well, i can't really see light getting through it, although i'd have to find some to test.

years and years ago we'd buy a roll of film, pull it out in the sun, and then get it developed but not printed. You could use that as an IR-passthrough filter on a camera lens - this is if my memory isn't faulty.
I'm now wondering how many images are generated a second that would all need to be recorded. How much is it going to cost to take a photo?
Scarab?
It's only $35k a month? I think we can all assume that basically any government has this now.
This is a curious attitude. No, the license doesn’t enforce itself. But usually when someone violates copyright companies tend to complain about it. Often that complaint is accompanied by a lawsuit, but I’ve heard a lot of complaints out of the entertainment industry the past 20 some years about copyright infringement, and I haven’t heard anybody talking about not complaining because they released things and should just assume somebody is going to infringe.

Nobody forces me to choose an open source license. Nobody forces me to use code that is open sourced either. So it’s a curious attitude to take issue with a company that providing software under an open source license as a bad guy for complaining when people don’t follow their license but not the entity that is violating the license that gives them the right to use software in the first place.
Firing and laying off are different things. You're fired if you're more or less at fault (misconduct, not meeting goals, not doing the job requirements, failing a drug test, violating policies, etc, etc); you're laid off if the position is being eliminated.

Sometimes there's a little bit of both; when you eliminate 7000 positions, you may or may not consider recent performance reviews while you're doing it. Sometimes the employer doesn't want to go through the process of firing for cause, so they claim it's a lay-off, etc. But there's a difference.

Layoff is better than the Britishism "made redundant" anyway. The action to make someone's position redundant generally happens at a different time as when the position is declared to be redundant. A merger may make many people's positions redundant, but they won't generally be laid off until a later time when their position is declared redundant.
> I am convinced that the issues around diagnostics caused by type errors involving it can be made almost as clear as E0308 is already today

That's very cool! I'm glad to hear it.

> An interesting thing is that

Ahh, this is an interesting point for sure; I chose return values basically at random, but I can see how that's easier than parameters are. Guess that would have been an ever so slightly more strong example on my part!
There is a deep hypocrisy in using such a dramatic insult about hubris to describe what is merely a person pointing out a (now corrected) grammatical mistake in a headline (which may or may not be in the process of evolving to no longer be a grammatical mistake, but as of now it's still pretty obviously wrong to say "Disney layoffs 7000 people").
Yes, Turning Red's low revenue was primarily a cause of the film not being in theatres, rather than the quality of its story.

I personally liked the story of Turning Red very much (though I'm biased to like it because it's set in Toronto), but more objectively, the film is a step above Strange World and Lightyear in terms of ratings.

Turning Red's ratings: 95% on the Tomatometer of Rotten Tomatoes (RT), 7.0/10 on IMDb, and 3.7/5 on Letterboxd

Lightyear's ratings: 74% on RT, 6.1/10 on IMDb, 3.0/5 on Letterboxd

Strange World's ratings: 72% on RT, 5.6/10 on IMDb, 3.0/5 on Letterboxd
What if my child hits a rough patch and becomes the victim of a drug user? So much the better if that drug user instead chose voluntarily to enjoy all the drugs they like on Swain's Island.
I don't believe it performed any better in disk sales, though I can't say what it did for streaming one way or another.

You can drop it from the data set and it doesn't change the argument, though. Disney's been dropping some impressive flops lately.
Ah ok that makes more sense
From, Yes, Minister,

"Stage 1: We say nothing is going to happen.

Stage 2: We say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it.

Stage 3: We say maybe we should do something about it, but there's nothing we can do.

Stage 4: We say maybe there was something, but it's too late now."
I have been using Makefile for over 10 years in all of my projects, and here are some features I've always found lacking in Makefile:

1. There is no way to display documentation for commands and accepted parameters. Yes, you can write a special task that will display comments, but you have to copy it from project to project.

2. The need to pass named parameters when calling tasks. I want to write `make serve localhost 3000` instead of `make serve bind=localhost port=3000`

3. I've always had the need in different projects to use the same commands, so I had to copy tasks from project to project. I need a central place with commands that I can apply to any project.

4. The ability to write tasks in different languages. In some cases, it's easier to write in Python or TypeScript/Deno.

5. And most importantly, it is difficult to write commands in Makefile that can be used in different environments. For example, I need to run commands on different groups of servers: production and staging. This could look like: `make production TASK1 TASK2` or `make stage TASK1 TASK2`. In other words, the production/stage task sets up the parameters for executing tasks in a specific environment. It might be possible to call commands in this way with Makefile, but it seems too complicated.

As a result, I decided to write my own utility for task automation: https://github.com/devrc-hub/devrc

It solves all of the above problems and has other interesting features and also written in Rust .
I'm kind of surprised to hear you say that. While my kids certainly like some older movies, a lot of them are incredibly slow and boring. Especially for me! Jungle Book, a movie I loved as a kid, has nothing on most of the newer releases, which are far more entertaining IMO.