skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Microsoft put out a 150 page paper yesterday on why GPT-4 is proto-AGI. LLM's are AI, now we're just closing the G gap.
Do user namespaces still break ptrace and gdb? I know gdb versions from 8 onward are much better at handling containerised processes, but I don't know if the reason why is related to what you're describing.
It's a common misconception.

I don't know why people think that something magically can't effect your credit report without knowledge of your SSN. Name+address+DOB is enough to identify you.

Chase does not require a Social Security number when you add an authorized user so people are always absolutely shocked their "authorized user account" appears on their credit report.
It was trained on human data about the same subject so we have every reason to expect it'd complain
What good faith is there when someone continually makes the speaker out as a bad person with ill intent?

"I’m also uncomfortable because it is my job to say:"

"We believe that the way to address speech that feels abhorrent, that feels harmful, that literally denies the humanity of people, that one way to do that is with more speech and not less. And not to shut you down or censor you or censor the student group that invited you here. That is hard. That is uncomfortable."

"They are here because they feel harmed not just by your speech."

"if you can listen through your partisan lens, your hyper-political lens and just look and see human beings"

"we ask that you come with good intentions and respect."

Then she goes and basically condones whatever the protesters were going to do:

"You all chose to be here today. Many people go before Judge Duncan who do not necessarily choose to be there. And they have to listen to everything he says. Literally thousands of people. You have a choice. You do not need to stay here if this is not where you want to be. You can stay if this is where you want to be right now. But make that choice."

There was zero good faith effort on her part.
> What is the crime here?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/securities_act_of_1933

But you bring up great points, and that's exactly why we use a political system called a "representative democracy" where if you don't like the laws, you can vote for those that align with your worldview, you can run for office yourself, or you can lobby your politicians to change them.

(Breaking the law is unfortunately not on that list.)
Anything preventing Bard/etc from using these plugins as well?

Would be nice to keep the ecosystem open.
cites The Guardian
I was considering doing the same (giving notice) and I'm doing similar things as you (product mgmt). What's your plan "to focus your career on what's happening in this field"?
If you watched the video[0], it has 2 extra tires on a left side mount. Calling this a bicycle isn't even accurate. Tricycle is more like it, though technically looks like a quadcycle.

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-mWwOrIdjU
> What is the crime here?

Offering unregistered securities, in apparent violation of the Securities Exchange Act. It's astounding how people think they can skirt the law without even familiarizing themselves with the law.
Disclosure: I own a Mach-E. Except for minor niggles, touch wood, it's been great.

The Mach-E and F150 architectures were stop-gaps, and pretty good at that.

* One, it still is not completely clean sheet, and thus has a lot of unnecessary complexity in wiring and body parts - which pushes up unit costs.

* Two, it's a 400V architecture that really doesn't like a lot of electrons flowing through it all at once. As a result it throttles charging speeds and acceleration pretty brutally.

* Yet, weirdly, Ford's electronics are quite a bit better than VW. No one is at Tesla levels, but VW's electronics is just bad. Quite a few YouTube reviewers have detailed this.
There have already been at least 3 other states trying to make this law. They've been discussed here on HN. I do not have links handy. So they may very well be on the path to their goals.

[Edit] Here [1] is the one for the UK and here [2] is the one for Louisiana. Partially related is the fight against PornHub [3]. Here [4] is the one for Arkansas and here [5] is Canada. There is at least one more, I could not find it. I want to say it was Oklahoma.

[1] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19501987 [UK]

[2] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34262400 [Louisiana]

[3] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31724701 [PornHub]

[4] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34789752 [Arkansas]

[5] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6097746 [Canada]
Do you have anything to say about the article?
> all forms of property

The problem is that you are assuming that "intellectual property" is property. You cannot assume that.

> Enclosure of the commons was certainly for private benefit.

Enclosure of parts of the commons that are rivalrous--only one person can use that part at a time--was, yes. But as I have already said, "intellectual property" is non-rivalrous, so this argument does not apply to it.

> There are numerous aspects of physical property ownership that we just take for granted that are not at all straightforward

This is quite true; it's why we have a complex system of private property common law for physical property, and some kinds (such as real estate) have even more complexity in the law attached to them.

But "intellectual property" is not physical property, and you can't just assume that all of the law that has been developed for physical property is automatically applicable to "intellectual property" as well.

> You seem to be using a “is it for the benefit of society” test to determine whether something is an intrinsic feature of capitalism.

I am doing no such thing. Indeed, the feature of capitalism I have been describing, namely regulatory capture, is not for the benefit of society; it is a net loss to society. But it is a benefit to the capitalists who buy the regulations they want. That's why they buy them.

> That’s not regulatory capture, that is inherent to what it is.

In the sense that regulatory capture is a common end state of capitalism (where "capitalism", as I have said elsewhere in this discussion, is not the same thing as "free markets", although capitalists would love for people to think it is), yes, it is "inherent" to capitalism. That still doesn't mean it's a net benefit to society. It isn't.
I saw a fun docu in Germany afrom such families.

The boy in the group just played games.

Non of them wanted to use the music instruments the parents bought.
US is trying to keep its world policeman and dominance status with any price. We will see how will it turn out.
I'm sorry, I don't understand the question.

Tripnotes doesn't take any data from your phone. It's a web app.

You can paste the text of emails and messages or write directly, and Tripnotes will tag the text you add to your note with POI information and a map of the POIs tagged / mentioned.
The worksona is a thing. My worksona doesn’t swear or drink, doesn’t have ADHD, doesn’t have any real hobbies outside of work besides home maintenance and travel to blandly popular locations like the beach, and yes, stoically takes in the details of a client need and makes unbiased recommendations. At some jobs, my worksona has been straight, if the situation called for it.

For further reading, watch Severance.

My real persona might be conspiring to eliminate my worksona, because fuck that guy.
What are the current implications of the experiments at CERN and for ATLAS? My current interpretation is that these are massive engineering marvels that are basically just data generators for some physicists to run statistics on. That is a pessimistic view, but I am just not aware of what's all going on there.

Compare this to LIGO, where one could make a similar argument, but LIGO is producing very explicit data that is driving tons of research and discoveries and is providing tandem support for electromagnetic observations.
I am pretty sure that what you say in your PS is so obvious, at least to anyone who cares what the mass of the W boson is to a precision of ~±2e-4, that it does not need saying. What does need saying is how bad the disagreement is, and when you are at the point where this difference has arisen and cannot quickly be resolved, publishing all the papers seems to be the best way to give the most complete information, available at that time, about the problem.

Once the contradictory Fermilab results were made available, what should the ATLAS group do? Well, one thing would be to double-check their own analysis, and it seems plausible that this is what led to the latest result. Using improved methods might just as well have revealed a problem as end up as it did, supporting the original analysis.
I agree that the dean's letter is a fine document that should set a standard. Hopefully, many people here on HN will take the time to click through and read it.

I hope you are right regarding the outcome.
brsFiddle – Roku BrightScript code playground
This is brsFiddle.net a BrightScript flavor of the popular jsFiddle.net, a coding playground for testing and sharing simple code snippets! It has the same limitations of the BrightScript Emulator library, no SceneGraph (yet) and no Video Playback (yet), but it uses the brand new v0.10.21 library that is faster and has implemented the Roku MicroDebugger so you can add break points (stop) to debug your code! Soon the web and desktop apps will also be updated with the new library.
You can see in the video that it has a third wheel...
I am curious how Apple will approach it. They have historically valued 100% certainty with Siri above all else, even if it means having an extremely limited feature set. If there is even a tiny chance it might do the wrong thing, they don't even enable the capability.

I don't see how they can ignore this though. But at the same time it goes against all of Apple's culture to allow the kind of uncertainty that comes out of LLMs.
I mean, Montenegro is at best tied with Serbia, whether or not you count Kosovo.
Are the AMD processors "U" series or "HS" series? Assuming the latter since they seem to be the ones more available initially.
I haven't seen anything interesting from this company yet. Just internal dongles.
Why does the video go all white in the middle?
They cannot cash a cheque before the date written on it.

Man, I hate to be [citation needed] Guy, but I don’t think that’s true. A quick search only gives me this:

https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/banking/postdated-check

I’d doubly-check that before relying on it.
That’s not how pen names work in publishing. Source: I’ve published books both under pen name and legal name.
Let’s not forget that Google is behind the Transformer model.
Much more embarrassing to be the intended audience for such a ruse.
matte display, ryzen...

now give me a keyboard with normal-sized arrow keys, and I will order one
it's not a high-end laptop really. it's more of an "all in" on being light.
Unlikely: OTCPK:LBPC

oh well.
Agree, those examples are not great. You could ask existing home devices the same thing. Pretty sure you can ask them to order things for you too.

But I do find it intriguing.
AWS provides services and APIs to support that specific usage. This service is MITM'ing another company's API. I'm pretty sure AWS wouldn't tolerate that sort of thing.
"done well"? At best isn't the jury out on that one pending what is left after we've handled climate change?
Maybe it was a poor example but you might be missing the point a little bit. By personalizing the prompt you can get potentially super high quality recommendations on filters that aren't even available in those apps. "I just dropped my kids off at soccer practice and I need something light and easy, what would Stanley Tucci order? give me an album and wine pairing and close the garage door"
I totaled up the results from only the "crosschecked" CSV files, here's what I saw:

APC: 5928825
LP: 4731127
PDP: 4555334
NNPP: 1019045

I tried to manually verify about a dozen rows myself, half were so blurry/low res they were illegible but the ones that were legible were all correct.

And for the "unsure" CSVs:

APC: 1308067
LP: 578482
PDP: 736183
NNPP: 513245

Also checked about a dozen, and all but one of them were wildly inaccurate so I wouldn't trust these much.
Absolutely! We’ve been chatting with Jack Humbert, and he’s actually been prototyping an ortholinear keyboard module for the Framework Laptop 16. There are likely some photos of it in press articles about the event today.
What's wrong with being wrong? In this case, I'm delighted to be wrong (though I believe I had evaluated OpenAI mostly right given my knowledge at the time).
I'm not familiar with the C-suite level, but I can confirm that my local CFA's operator is routinely working various positions at his store. When he isn't, he's sitting at a table working on paperwork.

I'm there a lot (some would say too much, but I wholeheartedly disagree!), and it's odd to pass through without seeing him. He works the register, he takes orders in the drive through, he directs traffic in the parking lot, he carries orders out-- everything. I'm certain that he's done shifts in the kitchen as well, just that I couldn't seem him to know.

Just today, I went into the restroom to wash my hands and he was cleaning the stall.
Can’t wait for all of the deceptive corporate marketing against this!
Same! I've found myself switching between so many computers and often wanting to share a bookmark with someone I eventually put them all on a Github Repo: https://github.com/seljabali/notes_to_self
> despite widespread accusations and suspicions of corruption, nepotism, and even drug trafficking, he is our ally... and hence not a dictator

Being a dictator means [1] to have absolute power. There are dictators that are friendly with the west and others that are not so much. Use of the term is orthogonal to whether or not a given country is an ally (other than that word choice can have ramifications)

Montenegro is regarded by a number of rankings [2] as being a hybrid regime, i.e. somewhere in between authoritarian and democratic. The results of the 2020 election [3] match that.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictator

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_regime#Measurement

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Montenegrin_parliamentary...
> short-circuit justice in this way

I'm failing to see the short circuiting. Tax dodging sentencing guidelines have a range. Capone was sentenced within that range. Same as Ulbricht. We don't re-hear a trial in front of a jury every time someone is sentenced because the jury has already rendered the verdict.

Sentencing is a complicated subject which balances not only justice, but also the safety of the prisoner and their fellow prisoners.
TFA:

"Lightning rods neither attract nor repel strikes, he added. Nor do they 'discharge" clouds, as used to be believed. They simply offer lightning an easy and safe route to the ground.'"
If a lot of people trust code that comes from your account, then it can and will be weaponized for a supply chain attack.

If you do not have the good sense to lock up such a weapon, then please delete your account.
What is a feed forward network? Is that anything like the current-state and next-state functions for representing finite state machines?
That's just the beginning. My favorite is the concept of the pre-payment penalty: a lender can (in some jurisdictions) charge you a fee if you attempt to pay down the principal on your loan sooner than you are required to.
We're going to need a name for this type of integration
Literally it's actually "work giver" and "work taker", I just found it less idiomatic in english (it doesn't quite transport the connotation of providing the work being something noble).
> The problem is that you are assuming that "intellectual property" is property.

Intellectual property is property.

Whether or not it should be is a different question, but it factually is property.
Are you saying the SPLC is an organization of these "witch hunters"?
Nothing particular. I just don't remember major successful and speedy product launches from Google after 2003. In that year, Google launched Google Maps, shocking the IT world for how effective AJAX can be, even though the tech itself was invented by MS. Maybe GMaps was so impressive that I forgot what other major launches were after that.
This is the most blatant ad hominem I’ve ever seen, and you should be ashamed of yourself.
Didn't use a guide, it's a bog-standard Arcade1Up conversion. A couple years ago I looked up a display driver board providing an HDMI input to the stock display and bought a $50 Amazon-sourced EG STARTS-brand cheapo kit of sticks and buttons with USB encoders. They were drop-in replacements for the stock deck's buttons and sticks. The emulator driver right now is just a 6th-gen i5 HP EliteDesk Mini fleet-salvaged workstation booting into RetroArch.

These days you can go even easier with fully installed plug-and-play Arcade1Up control panel replacements that are literally drop-in - MDF, sticks, buttons, encoders, and audio/display driver card are all built in. You just pull the stock control deck out, drop the $150 Intec deck in, and connect whatever PC/console/FPGA into the video in and USB controller outputs that it provides. You can build a cab around one out of plywood or just grab a random Arcade1Up on sale somewhere.
For sure, I don't identify that to be a source of friction nor am I seeking to become true friends with colleagues. Am a friendly person in general though
What does it mean to have "objects" implemented in hardware?
You may find fun in Killing Floor 2. If wave-based horde survival shooter is your thing.
This comment itself is in such bad faith that I don't even know where to begin. Imagine this. A progressive event was taking place in which a progressive speaker didn't get to do their planned talk. Instead an administrator gave their pre-written notes (literally printed) and went into a diatribe admonishing the intended speaker when their job was to help moderate the event. Are you seriously telling me that this was appropriate?
> flying private because only normies can do bad things and need to have their movements subject to scrutiny

You still go through customs when flying private.
AGI is a conscious intelligent alien. It will want things the same way we want things. Different things, certainly, but also some common ground is likely too.

The need for resources is expected to be universal for life.
We’ve opened the specs specifically to avoid this scenario! The information we have up on GitHub today is enough to get started on module development, and we’ll share any additional information that is useful to enable third party board makers.
How does this end if you don't have CashApp installed?
Whats funny is if you ask Google Bard about Bard being shut down, it says it has already been shut down and references hacker news.

I just asked Bing Chat the same question and it said "Google Bard has not been shut down. There was an error where Bard incorrectly said it had already been shut down. This error is due to Bard sourcing information from the web."
Back in early 2000s there were some supposed Early Streamer Emission (ESE) rods that claimed to reduce the need for rods by supposedly initiating the upward stream earlier, causing interception further away from the rod location. That tech has been quite thoroughly debunked (there was a big retrospective study in Malaysia that settled it, iirc). I remember seeing these systems being marketed by quite a lot of serious people at trade shows. Anyway, that's a bit off topic but i meant to say that it's cool to actually see the two streamers on a picture like that.
This is a question that has been at the back of my mind for some time. I may be very wrong.

I always thought of an interpreter as a translator, while a compiler was a translator and optimizer.

So my question - can LLMs do this? They are really good at contextualizing and generating code - so why not build a compiler that is basically an LLM?
Of course of those problems become too much for the CEO they can always quit.
I'd say it's not so much that "films are not supposed to be realistic" as that films simply aren't realistic. Any additional change to make them more "realistic" is really an aesthetic choice, which may or may not work for people.

People liked some things, like talkies. And they rejected other things, like 3D. I could come up with an after-the-fact rationalization for why some things worked and some didn't, but it's pretty much impossible to tell beforehand.
Stanford Law School, home of the Bankman-Frieds.
Yes but.... money
>fits perfectly into the DEI's fundamental idea of how speech should work: the speaker must justify the value of his/her speech in order to have it.

The speaker must justify the value of his/her speech based on their identity and position within the oppression hierarchy in order to have it.
Right, I'm point out that framing it as a debate is itself up for dispute.
Sensor white-out. The exposure length is long enough to catch the bulk of the strike and that changes the amount of light on the sensor to such a degree that all of the sensor pixels max out in terms of charge, so you get a white image.
It's like observability versus debugging.

Sure, ideally you can get all your actionable information from your metrics, but in reality sometimes to understand what's really happening you just need to step through the code one statement at a time.
The videos show it's a tricycle, with one wheel sticking out in the middle on the left.
He got a "Fahrrad" award which is a German word for cycle making no mention of number of wheels.
> . I expect when you order a new mainboard it will be an option for checkout

It's not yet, but soon, hopefully.
Yes, bleach is great when you dilute it properly, ventilate, wear gloves, and don't mix it with other chemicals, thanks article!
You may be interested in https://discourse.haskell.org/t/towards-an-actor-framework-f..., then!
There was a Roger Moore show "TV NATION" where he challenged CEOs to do things with their products. "Format a Floppy" was one. The only one who took him up was the ford CEO who did an oil change.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TV_Nation
A friend gave me melatonin gummies.
I don't feel like they help with my sleep, but every time I consume them I become aware that I'm dreaming, and I'm able to control each aspect of my dream.
It's been really fun, but at the same time I avoid doing this on weekdays, because otherwise I don't feel like I actually got the chance to rest.
> Lightning rods neither attract nor repel strikes, he added. Nor do they "discharge" clouds, as used to be believed. They simply offer lightning an easy and safe route to the ground.

Is that not a refutation of the explanation you've had?
To the point that Google Bard said it had been shut down, you ask Bing chat about this and it says "Google Bard has not been shut down. There was an error where Bard incorrectly said it had already been shut down. This error is due to Bard sourcing information from the web."
So far we've done well. We may annihilate a big chunk of life on the planet in a nuclear apocalypse tomorrow, but up to today we're ok. It's too early to tell what comes next.

If we're going to penalize humanity for climate change we might as well give points to humanity for becoming capable of diverting asteroids or curing multi-species plagues too.
Where the hell do we even go from here? The logical step seems to be to start studying AI now but even Sam Altman has said that he’s thinking that ML engineers will be the first to get automated. Can’t find source but I think it was one of his interviews on YouTube before chatgpt came out.
I can be confident we’ll screw that up. But I also wouldn’t want to bet our survival as a species on how magnanimous the AI decides to be towards its creators.
TBH the lightest bicycle is also 800 times more exciting than the heaviest one.