skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I work with data and keep having the first use case, and it's pretty common in my company. So far we're using Streamlit and Rshiny (bilingual data org). We're not really happy with Streamlit, since it's pretty easy to grow out of its pretty single minded way of working.

I'll definitely be checking this out!
Haiku is an open source BeOS clone that is still developed, but the original isn’t
You can use haiku os it’s the open source beos and even runs the binaries
Using the web with JavaScript turned off
There is a difference between being vegetarian and being vegan.

A lot of vegetarians do eat/drink dairy products like milk.
Same issue with CI systems surely? And indeed Github itself! But people use them. I wonder why they are so successful.
Great it's open source software in the form of a git repo now.

But for some reason, using the same repository for 3 independent projects horrifies me.

The commits are unavoidably going to be all over the place, and tracking one project's changes hard.
> Rider still insists on Java style guidelines for .net projects.

No, it uses Resharper as the backend.
Right! I feel you have been heavily implying it isn't a trait worth considering, which it obviously is. Transients do matter, and any mixer worth his salt will recognise when the speaker is fighting against them in this regard.

I personally think the tight transient response coupled with the mid forward character is what makes it a solid tool worth considering. Remove either trait and the speaker would lose its usefulness. My suspicion would be that the transient handling plays an important part of why people like working with these speakers.

As to why they are popular: I'm totally on board with calling it hype reaching critical mass. The NS10s sounds terrible, but they are pretty consistent between rooms given their sealed nature. If you can count on it being everywhere it is worth learning as a tool. The speaker also being revealing of transients and a critical band of frequencies is the icing on the cake here.
I have it on good authority that Bard will be shut down in the next six months if it doesn't show massive adoption. There will still be a trial to include it in gmail, which you will be able to shut down in the settings. But it's a re-run of the Google+ play and once they go down that path the shutdown is pretty much inevitable, the bigger question is how much the Google brand will be damaged before they realize they can't compete.

Nothing but tough choices on their part. They thought they had much more time before releasing it into the wild so now they are competing with a half-baked product.
I think this is a futile discussion. I think originality certainly exists, and I've seen it may times in the art world.

I could be wrong, but you seem to imply originality is a made up concept?
Do original thoughts even exist?

Are our comments original or just regurgitation?

Do you believe nothing ever created throughout history is original then?

If you believe originality does exist, where and how do you draw the line?

I don't think people are as boring as you think they are. Or maybe you just don't appreciate art. I can't tell. Some people say they do, but they really don't.

And further, even if we do ignore originality as a concept and pretend for the sake of the argument it doesn't exist, someone still values that style or approach to creation. That probably makes a living based on the subjective value it brings to the table. They sold their work. An AI company now profits off of their work, having used it in an algorithm, without paying anything to those artists.

As an experiment: Give me an example of something you've made yourself that you valued enough to sell, and then tell me why I deserve to have it for free. Maybe that will help me understand. Maybe you can work for me for free?

If none of their work was original or valuable, why even train on it, and why can you even ask for "in style of X"?

Also, the approach of waving responsibility onto individuals is too naïve. If that worked, we'd not need laws or any type of regulation.

Anyway, even with this diatribe I still don't think AI is a bad thing or that it will replace people or or their work—in its current iteration at least. It'll probably improve it, but I certainly understand why people feel violated.
its not Intel's first foray into cancelled discreet GPUs. they've been on and off with this for at least 13 years
Better a private entity that needs bailing out with taxpayer money than one that is normally funded by taxpayers.
Maybe you should actually try to live in a "city" in southern Europe.

Just don't pick Lisbon, Porto, Madrid, Barcelona, Rom, Napel, Milano, Athens, Zagreb for the actual experience.

Here is a suggestion, country side in the middle of the country, or one of the Mediterrean or Atlantic island.
Antennas are not amplifiers. As long as the antenna is correctly tuned to the impedance of the transmitter output stage, it will radiate most of the power of the transmitter, but cannot exceed 100% (it is a passive element, and exceeding 100% would break the laws of conservation of energy). In this case the size of the antenna does not affect the total power emitted and there will be no range gains from using a bigger antenna.

What the antenna size/shape can affect is the directionality of the beam. By emitting the same power directionally, you can increase the range in some directions at the expense of reducing the range in all other directions. But the total power would be still the same.

Also the reception gain is actually the same thing as emission gain. You cannot make a passive antenna that has better reception without making it more directional, which means worse reception from some other directions. You cannot improve reception from all directions by making a bigger antenna.
Sock2bot, a common business model.
I don't have larger scale experience on this at the moment, but I can tell you what I observed during my trials (also see my related blog entry for some more info: https://www.paepper.com/blog/posts/build-q-and-a-bot-of-your...)

It cost around 0.05$ to create the embeddings for my ~50 blog entries.

Asking a question in the way I've described it also costs around 0.05$ via the API.
None of that is happening. Those are substantive criticisms. You are not immune from criticism, and complaining about it is a way to avoid addressing the merits.
That's exactly it, thaks for providing the missing context. As a youngster, I was a big fan of Edison and read a lot about him back then.
The use of "macOS" capitalization somehow makes it appear as if it's about the current Apple OS, when in fact this is about classic MacOS.
If using the default builder, environment variables are included automatically as a configuration provider.
Go for it, it's quite easy to do, you only need to adapt the `https://github.com/mpaepper/content-chatbot/blob/main/create...` file a bit to match the way your data is represented and then you are good to go.
Many do, even if they don't drive at home.

Plenty, it shows not wanting to endure the actual pain locals have with local transport system, if one exists at all.
Most people don’t go vegan or vegetarian. It’s really a very tiny segment of the population, partially driven by ESG and our corporate overlords who want us to own nothing. And partly driven by Indian tech bros, they’re very keen on stopping me from getting my daily beef ration.
https://archive.ph/djLku
Your view of the story is completely flawed.
Your first point is false. There is no regulation that forces banks to buy long term government bonds. There is some regulation that forces them to have a certain percentage of capital tier 1 to safeguard themselves from bank runs, but it was repealed in 2018 by trump for “regional” banks and SVB CEO lobbied strongly for it for years and was ecstatic when it finally happened: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/mar/11/silicon-val... .
ML can be used for function inversion but it only works well for somewhat smooth functions. If a hash function is well implemented then it will not be smooth. It is possible that ML can be used to discover a weakness in an implementation, however.
Who is calling for pure socialism? The only people I hear mention it are reactionary anti-progressives.
Currently, it only splits documents linearly, so if you have information which is written backwards or things like that, it will likely not work so well.
Banking is basically nationalized now.

The government outsourced this responsibility to the Federal Reserve at the same time that a federal income tax began.

There are 3 main ways to balance a government budget. Spend less, raise more funds through taxes, or make the scale of debt decrease through inflation.
This link doesn't seem to actually work.
If you want them to remain the same, use symbolic links.
I think this is the majority of the problem(s) with bluetooth, bad defaults.

In cars, second issue is no button to switch on/off, instead either the overly complex pairing process or the overly aggressive one.

In phones, its non standard playback - I'm in the camp that audio should pause/resume for calls, and calls should always be routed through the phone you use.

If you get a call while on the road either it should do nothing (no connect to car or auto route) or it should be hands free, per phone preference (no fiddling with settings in the car dash, period). This mostly works with some setups, but there's no easy config option and phones don't all have easily customized UIs. Your phone should probably be in charge of the volume too - some car I have gotten into try to rupture my eardrums, others seem to be on whisperquiet and need considerable cranking. Oh, and there should be a BT device priority, there usually isn't and sometimes my headphones get usurped by the car.

My solution so far if I want BT is just to use headphones, and unpair all devices from the dash. I would use in car BT more if they worked in a reliably similar fashion.

A standardized "ask the user" protocol might help some. I don't think Apple or Android play are valid alternatives, though - there are legit use cases for BT interactions that don't involve phones at all, making over complex top heavy proprietary protocols the norm just destandardizes things more, it doesn't make them better.
(Is there really a Google AI-powered writing tool? And is it really shutting down?)
The cell lines are literally cancerous, for one. You can look that up. But it just feels wrong, without trying to be too offensive it’s the same reason I am repelled by transgendered and heavily tatted people. Part of my brain switches into fight or flight mode and screeches DANGER at me.
> Of course it's a stylistic choice, but camera choice often is.

OK, I guess I mean to exclude this kind of work which is done because the cameras are of much worse technical quality — these are by definition not applications for which traditional dedicated cameras are used.

In other words, the toys are not replacements for more capable equipment. Yes, you can shoot with a Barbie camera (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkmrFguxgS0). But nobody could seriously claim that it replaces any standard ILC. We're not discussing whether or not phones (or Barbies) can take photos; we're talking about whether or not they can replace ILCs, and in what applications.

> Now that's interesting - well-lit, no motion or anything, but still much better portraits? Would be interested to hear some more details about what's different/better.

Well, of course, also, we don't always have good lighting or a lack of motion. Often, I am photographing people in motion, or in poor lighting, or both. And that's not a super niche thing. Imagine photographing an actor who is in the middle of a rehearsal (which I've done many times). A dedicated camera is just the right tool for that job, with the appropriate lens attached. Not to mention, of course, you want to have a somewhat telephoto lens for that — and one area where phone cameras have been, to my eyes, mostly marketing bluster is that of "super-zoom."

But looking back just at the same gear example I mentioned earlier: I often use my Sigma 135mm f/1.8 lens on my (full-frame) Canon R5. Now, I'll concede that this lens itself is much, much larger than anything you could slap on a phone, and the full-frame sensor is also far bigger than what you'd find on any phone, so you'd EXPECT something larger.

Now, to be fair, this is one of the lenses you can buy (tied with a Canon and Sony of the same spec) with some of the shallowest possible DOF on a full-frame camera. I don't always shoot wide open, but sometimes I do. In the ideal situation, I'd be shooting at ISO 100. And a 45MP FF sensor at its base ISO is just going to be ... really good. Admittedly, the iPhone (more than the Pixel, to my eyes, by a LONG shot) can produce some OK fake bokeh. But I suppose that my eye is good enough to know real bokeh from fake. My R5 will focus perfectly on the point I want and get the shot I am looking for every time. And AI-based trickery won't work equally well with all subjects; pure optics stays the same no matter what you're shooting.

The Pixel, though, in my opinion, produces pretty bad photos. Everything is NR'd, sharpened and HDR'd until it looks like a watercolor. I much prefer to apply (in most cases) pretty limited adulteration to my photos (which I shoot in RAW). I can shoot RAW with my phone, but I've never been anywhere near satisfied with the results. I will confess that the RAW results from the iPhone are significantly better, though still nothing like what I get from my dedicated camera. (I won't use an iPhone for reasons unrelated to photography.)
Yes, this will be an interesting next experiment - adding agents with additional tools (also for example access to internal APIs) will be quite powerful.
At the moment unless we get more information about what metric you're supposed to evaluate it on, you could probably simplify the headline to just "Bard is much worse than chatgpt" without any loss of accuracy.

It's not really realistic to expect people to give Google credit for these amazing models they have published results about but haven't let people play with - they have given people Bard and people are evaluating it based on the criteria most obvious to them - a comparison to a very similar product that has just been released.
> catastrophising of climate change is also harmful

What if it is a catastrophe? Should we pretend otherwise?

The word 'catastrophize' implies that the speaker is creating the catastrophe. Climate change sure seems like one to me, whether anyone says it or not.
Good, but from previous experience they don't make these archives available to the general public.
This! My car automatically syncs my contacts (which I have never used) once it connects my Phone, instead of,like, playing the radio, allowing me to call, or show me the goddamn GPS route.
The problem is that Independents aren't actually independent. They strongly identify as neither Democrat or Republican, but they consistently support one or the other.

80% of Independents identify as leaning Democrat or Republican. Independents who identify as Democrat-leaning are just as likely as regular Democrats to hate the Republican party, and visa-versa.

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/03/14/political-in...
For me Blazor is a mess. It’s component system is even worse then Angular, a complete OOP-mess. Yes it’s easy to use, but some things don’t work and it takes ages to find out why.

I prefer next.js for the frontends.
I should have said “safer”. It was never “safe”, but neither is the offline world.
Uracil in the Carbonaceous Asteroid Ryugu
I asked chatgpt to give me the equivalent "ss" command to "netstat -nap". It did and it was correct because I already knew the answer and tried it anyway. Then I asked the equivalent of "netstat -rn" (if any), it gave me "ss -r" something, which is wrong.

So you either know enough to spot the error or you verify all of it.

Another example. I had a long session with it where I was trying to get it to write a gitlab ci config file where the artifacts to be deployed to Netlify were already present at the root of the repo. As an addition it had a requirement to use 'sed' to rewrite a domain name recursively. This is the first and only time chatgpt was useful to me although it made a lot of mistakes that needed correcting.It was more useful than a google search because I wasn't able to find the correct format with it as most examples assumed a build step.

One thing that was frustrating is how I would give it requirements and it would incorporate them only to lose a prior requirement when fixing a latter one. I ended up hand fixing one of the later configs rather than using the final one it gave me.

For example I needed to use a node image because netlify-cli was required (the only custom thing necessary from the image) but it would revert to using an Alpine image and point to a now archived repo with a nonexistent release url for gitlab's cli.

When it fixed something else it would break the find .. sed combination and add nonsensical things like *. html to it rather than working on all files recursively.

In the end, through a combination of AI helping and the user (me) chiming in and trying to reason about it I was able to get somewhere.

Not ideal but not useless.
I was just excited that I got it working at all :/
> Well, we'll see. There are predictions of global devastation within the next decade.

We've already 'seen'. The science is, of course, based on an enormous amount of empirical evidence. We can always just say, 'we'll see what happens next', but it's a bizarre argument - on that basis you never act.
"seeing how close"
I think they just got lazy and entitled. Maybe ChatGPT will be the scare they need. It feels bad though; they almost don’t deserve the energy this fight will give them.
Are you being intellectually honest when you imply that the only options are prison sheds for the poor animals, and lab grown abominations? No, you’re arguing like a child. This wouldn’t even work on a child, I don’t know why you think it would work on me.
All abstractions leak. There are some physical facts about software we keep denying for some reason. There is no silver bullet. Every enterprise systems turns into a big ball of mud over time. Team structures get imprinted in the design of systems built by these teams.

And every abstraction leaks. Living on a given level without at least an accurate mental model of everything bellow it limits your ability as a developer. Sure you can just do scripting for a web dev team your whole career. If that's what you want...
Yes, that's true, if you're addicted they make it harder to escape it. But it's a difference of degree mostly.
It doesn't.

This implementation has a very incompatible (and problematic) deviation from the privileged ISA spec.

It seems to act as if there was a hardcoded, stuck, TLB entry that cannot be removed, so the whole system has to work around it. And to add insult to injury, it affects a virtual memory address range that happens to be used in most Linux programs.

IMHO ASUS is doing a disservice to RISC-V by releasing a board with such a chip. They should have used something else or skipped this generation.
Honestly, how dare you ? /s
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/anti-modi-pos...
This seems like the most relevant link. Seems like it’s “bad thing related to free speech happened in India”, don’t know if that meets HN’s standards or not.
You cannot repurpose almost all land that farm animals use to grow crop. This is marginal land where only grass grows, or hilly, rocky terrain where equipment is not effective.
> the crowd who think global warming is the biggest challenge we face have been outplayed by the very real disasters and escalations we've been facing since 2020

Your argument is assumptions - that climate change isn't the biggest challenge, that others are bigger.

> The well resourced anti-US axis that is developing between Russia and China is a much bigger threat than difficulties adjusting to climate change. Which have generally been fairly minor challenges in the official reporting.

What is "official reporting"?

China and Russia feature quite largely in the news. It's hard to imagine them getting more coverage.
Mac OS, to be pendantic about styling :)
Oh, is that why it takes so long to start audio? If you dont download contacts does audio start in a reasonable time?
>Probably a Republican president would be just as bad

Yes we all know the previous President famously kept his family far away from the levers of power.
India doesn't even pretend that it is a free speech country so this is not surprising.
What? No, the purpose of a bank is to make loans to loan worthy entities, for which they should receive adequate recompense reflecting the risk of default. Investments don't come into it. It's only in recent years that banks started doing investment, and arguably that's a big part of the problem.
> You appear to be operating under the impression that the every syllable of a rhyming couplet has to rhyme exactly for it to be considered a rhyme

I'm not operating under that impression, but the author is [1].

To me, the final "sounds" should match - not every syllable, an end rhyme according to wiki [0]. Specifically I would consider a rhyme to require matching sounds "at least from last vowel to end", but I don't think of rhymes first from the strict definition. Perhaps it's an accent thing but "-us" in cactus is not the same sound as "-ice" in practice. If a child made a poem with these sounds I would tell them "good job, it's a rhyme", and perhaps for the purpose of a silly word game too. But I would not use it as a passing case for a test of any sort like the author.

What's more pleasing is irrelevant, what is relevant is if its a true rhyme.

[0] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/end_rhyme#English

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=35258385&goto=item%3Fi...
> Wrong. This is corruption. Janet is picking winners and losers. Some people are losing their deposits and some are not. You are systemic if you had dinner with Janet yesterday.

No no no, that's not how financial markets work. It's the stuff that happens after dinner over drinks that makes the difference
> Same reason film is big lately.

Also Instax / Polaroid. AFAIK, Fuji makes the majority (or at least a very significant chunk) of their consumer camera sales with Instax cameras and Instax film.
I think the design choice is key to the game, but for a different explanation. “Be liberal in what you accept” -> don’t reject a valid but obscure word as a guess, because people who know it’s a word will be rightly annoyed that the game is kneecapping their play.
Nothing beats “Good news, everyone!”, though.
> its almost silly to question Google's ability to build useful LLMs.

Unless they release a model one can "use" and verify their claims it's literally silly to make this statement.
It's because the right benefits in two ways by politicizing it:

1. Attacking the left brings them support

2. Their carbon industry supporters.
The fuck are you on about? In the US 2 days off per week is standard + additional vacation days.
Why does it matter whether statements were made? It’s quite obvious to any objective observer that a large, powerful nation would perceive an enemy alliance expanding to its border would be perceived as a threat.

How would the US respond to an enemy alliance incorporating Mexico or Canada?
Photos are just some pseudo-reality version of who we think we are, even without filters. You choose the angle, the lighting, whatever, all with a specific goal in representing yourself.

Oh, you also add choosing the clothes, the hair style and your posture/facial expression to the mix.

It (the genre of image we're talking about)'s all unnatural and meant to portray people in a light somebody wants to portray them in. In fact that's most of "photography" is.