skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Let's not forget about the links to scam sites.

This is one of the sites it shows you for "log in to g mail"

https://clinmedjournals.org/articles/blogs/gmail-login.html
Good question! I came up with the name because the idea is best described as low-rank adaptation. I know very little about radio communication and didn't anticipate the visibility my repo has today :)
Someone is always profiting from inflated prices. I suspect it's not the poor.
Microsoft is really still in their infancy of building out their end vision for AI in search. Right now it's roughly a chat bot that summarizes and gives references, without really tying into their core search well. Eventually it will negate the need to click through to many reference, then it will be better able to curate a list of alternative sources for what you seek. I think that's the big problem with AI as it stands now, people think we've already reached the end of the road, when really we're only at the beginning of it. Watch and see what the next decade of it looks like. I agree with Bill Gates that it all will fundamentally changed the way we see and interact with the world (for the better).
> Chronically low interest rates is a wealth redistribution program to the ones who get the biggest loans

What's the mechanism? A big loan is a big risk. With a big risk you can have either a big reward or a big failure. Smaller loans, smaller risks, smaller rewards and smaller failures. It's proportional. Why do you think of wealth redistribution?
I was upvoting you, but then reading

> Especially in Python.

made me unvote.
Generally optics. In some cases, it also lets the "retiree" keep many of their benefits (though in its own way that removes choice too).
They've had plenty of time to demonstrate that app stores could provide that value, but it doesn't seem to be the case today.

There are hundreds of flashlight apps, for example, and many of them hoover up as much data as they can.

I can't bring myself to try mobile games anymore, because the discovery mechanisms ensure that IAP skinner boxes are preferentially surfaced in the app stores.

On desktop platforms, the app stores offer less functionality and little in the way of confidence that an app is "official".

No, "quality and safety" is a fig leaf which the platform owners use to justify their rent-seeking behavior.
This. Also Edge is so so powerful. Especially when I can just drop some content into a webpage, load it in Edge and then click the blue icon in the top right and just ask questions. This is a competitive advantage even over ChatGPT.
… the allocator can only do so much. If there's a small allocation after a large one, and the large on is freed and the small one held forever, you may never be able to de-fragment that.

I think it's telling that Unix started with sbrk and ended up with mmap, here.
You don't need to control the domain (only for wildcards), ability to serve under .well-known is enough.
Does PageRank even work fundamentally when the search engine using PageRank is so big that it influences essentially every webmaster in the world?
>And active key zeroation if it thinks you're trying to drill through the epoxy surrounding the crypto boundary.

Or passive! Probably it wasn't a real product but I recall reading about one that derived its key from the field generated by randomly arranged magnetic particles in the resin, or something like that. The point was to make it impossible to disturb the resin without altering the key.
I am sorry, I actually, genuinely, struggle to understand what point you are making here. Can you clarify that, please?
I'm personally using less Google and more ChatGPT. Google results seem irrelevant. this giant could be in trouble
Sorry, the prep isnt worth money, the 10 minute conversation if successful was worth those amounts
Oh, 100% this is actually a school that's being run specifically to appeal to those segments you named. The curriculum is designed by a Christian college. This part actually makes this story much, much more ironic/entertaining. They're eating their own in this case.

This would be like some kind of a "Social Justice school" firing its principal for allowing one book by a white person to be read in class.

The important difference is, the thing I just made up is fictional and this article is apparently not.
Sounds like a fair argument, thank you for expounding.
Energy Scavenging – Can we keep our electronics running indefinitely?
It’s not paranoia to think that China and the U.S. are engaged in a cyber conflict. For quite some time China has engaged in cyber warfare to steal American technological secrets and to spy on the U.S. We spy on them. Both nations are adversaries of each other and it’s not paranoia to recognize the blatantly obvious.
Major Labels Want ISP to Pay Additional $12M in Piracy Liability Case
How does a mortal use gpt with bing? I need to install an app?
+1 except for Larry/Sergei ever returning, I think that ship sailed about 10 years ago
> always thought "trickle-down" economics was about giving money to businesses via tax-breaks

Tax-breaks doesn't mean giving money to businesses, they mean taking less money from businesses.
About the last thing security-wise that I want is for http server to control DNS record (which is required to have wildcard certs in LE)
Time to layoff 50,000 employees and announce another stock buy back to prop up the share price for <24 hours
It's ruled by monied people, who manufacture consent amongst the stupid people partly by convincing them that the executive and legislative branches are somehow answering to the stupid people, and not the monied people.

This works, because we're stupid.
They mention using Dyneema for the space elevator tether, a material I hadn't heard about.

https://www.gearpatrol.com/outdoors/a462827/everything-you-n...
Larry Summers and Dan Tarullo explicitly confirm that SVB would have passed a Fed stress test in 2022. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYgz4KSRPww#t=5m10s>
Given some of the behaviour we've seen thus far from OpenAI, I wonder how long it'll take before there's a breach and release of the weights, or a ransomware attack holding them hostage. Have we ever seen such financial potential concentrated in such a small private repository? I'm sure there are some examples, maybe the RenTech Medallion Fund's core model.
As I said. Took several years and Volcker was appointed late '79. To R's credit, he didn't get in the way of that part.
Although tax cuts don't help inflation so wasn't a clean assist.

He also vastly increased govt spending later in his term, despite the common narrative about being frugal.
I'd rather install edge on my computer than type more than one sentence using my phone.
There is emulation of WiiU titles which might save you the cost.

I can honestly say that the WiiU is worth it. It’s nice playing games that don’t have all the boring and time wasting tactics that modern games have.

But that’s just me. I play my WiiU once a week at least!
> it would be immediately gamed to prefer over-priced knockoff garbage, to the extent that all online shopping would become a shitshow to everyone within a few years

Have you used Amazon lately? This is the world we live in already today. Human shoppers are being gamed instead of AI shoppers but the outcome is the same. Online shopping is a shitshow.

There will be an arms race between people building the AIs and people gaming the AIs. And it's not yet clear who will win long term. Anyone who claims to know is talking out of their ass. But within my lifetime it will be harder to fool AIs than it is to fool humans.
FBI disruption of Breachforums, arrest of founder
Once upon a time there was a program called "GoodTools" that maintained a database of all known dumps, so you could run it against your ROMs and it could identify which ROMs were known bad. Dumb completionists then decide to collect and distribute sets containing every ROM - including the bad ones - in the GoodTools database, so-called "good sets", which besides wasting lots of bandwidth and storage space (at a time when this stuff wasn't quite so cheap!) also unfortunately helped bad dumps stick around.
That is exactly my interpretation. Both wall-e and Dalí. I think we are in agreement.
Reasons the banking crisis isn’t a repeat of 2008
Ubuntu LTS has a package called linux-hwe that backports the latest Ubuntu kernel to the last LTS release. I find it's a good compromise between maintaining a mainline kernel and using an ancient one. And since the hwe kernel is provided by Ubuntu and used in its release, it's been tested by thousands of users and updating it is a breeze.

My only complaint is that I wished it went back 2 LTS releases. For example, the current project I'm working on settled on 20.04 and there are no more new hwe kernels being released for it despite the rest of the userland receiving updates.
This is exactly it. Google is trying to get people to stay on the pages they click, and they optimize for this behavior, not for utility or for quickly accessing information.

If you go to a page and immediately find what you are looking for, Google interprets that as failure.

This is why Bing and AI based search can completely beat Google web search, because they are trying to serve the searcher rather than serve ads.
LMAO, sounds like fun
"Trickle Down Economics" is a talking point of those who oppose whatever it is that they want to attack at a given moment.

It can, and has at times, meant:

- Corporate bailouts and "welfare"

- Tax cuts

- Deregulation

- Lobbying / big money donations

Sometimes it means some of the above, other times it means all of the above. But the point is that no one on the fiscal conservative side of the aisle has ever come out and used the term "trickle down economics." Their opposition uses that word because it is loaded and it speaks to their base.

> Those spending never reaches the "lower classes"

What spending are you talking about? The OP was talking about removing barriers to creating business and attributed these barriers to good intentions. We can probably safely assume that the OP is a fiscal-conservative who favours deregulation and a business-friendly environment. And for what it's worth I am not trying to take one side over the other, you just lost me at "spending." The OP is talking about the exact opposite of spending. They are taking a "private solutions over public solutions" position. One where you spend less by having less overhead and red tape standing in the way of those who want to produce goods & services thus creating abundance of supply which lowers prices in addition to more jobs which puts more money in peoples' pockets.
Wealth taxes, unlike most taxes, would be inflationary because they force selling assets and therefore increase monetary velocity.
X-59 QueSST – Quiet SuperSonic Technology
Succinct and to the point. Kinda well written in that regard!
Your comments here are way less constructive, fwiw. Those in glass houses ...
I would 100% use Bing more if they offered a "minimal" or "low bandwidth" mode that cuts out all of the pictures, news, weather, etc. and just takes me to the results.
Roger, ty for the info.
If the FTC had teeth and good judgement, they'd force OpenAI to rename themselves.
I do think parents should be able to review the stuff they're kids are getting thought and probably have the option to opt out. so they're kids can learn about it on youtube the way they're supposed.
I have clicked on that heart more times than I want to admit...
Turns out that, in the long run, some of us aren't dead.

Kenyes is though, so...
Show HN: The Shark Programming Language
Right... I forgot about all that pettiness, and I have definitelty seen teachers booted out for less over some personal feud.
Eh, for me it's that it's a grouping I don't like. I would really rather have the config and data bundled together. It's kind of like OOP where the functions and data are bundled together.
Yup. That's exactly what happened.
Why not? Surely if you can get away with price gouging, then you would want to price gouge on more stuff, right? Of course, there are diminishing returns here, because as you produce more stuff, you might be able to gouge less and less. But certainly there must be some max-profit equilibrium higher than the current price, if you are already able to gouge.

Price gouging usually leads to producing more stuff, if it goes on long enough and you are allowed to produce more.

Healthcare is an example where this doesn't work, because you aren't allowed to produce more stuff. You can gouge all you want, but can't provide any additional quantity of services. (See: Certificate of Need laws in the US)
Only in English. For other languages, Bing was and continues to be garbage.
It is only happening, because now we have startups with VC, trying to redo Java and .NET application servers, but now with Kubernetes and WASM containers they are supposed to be hip and trendy with plenty of YAML, not like the granddaddy's JVM and CLR based boring servers with XML all over place.
I did. It's still wrong.
Heck, I'd love to not even carry the GPU unless I want to use it. What ever happened to external GPUs for mobile gaming? I faintly remember hearing about them years ago, but I don't know if there were ever practical consumer/prosumer products. I imagine it's not uncommon for some laptop users to carry Thunderbolt docks that are pretty beefy (the one I use weighs a full pound, although I almost never carry it with me), and I would bet you could fit a decent mobile GPU in a similar or smaller form factor.
Short certificate lifetimes (e.g. 1 hour) is not valid-for-a-single-request as the GP asked.

I'm having a real hard time wrapping my head around how Public Key Infrastructure could co-exist with every public key being a nonce. I'm not confident that it is impossible, but GP's question seems like an interesting theoretical/categorical question more than a hyperbolic "how short can lifetimes go?".

1 hour lifetimes sounds incredibly complicated to orchestrate on a practical level. Do you use a lot of short-lived ephemeral hosts (e.g. a swarm of docker images)? I'm not sure how 1 hour lifetimes wouldn't cause systemwide chaos in what I consider a "typical" microservice architecture.
what then OnlyFans. I think that's pushing it a little.
That sounds more like a hindsight thing. In most systems authorization doesn't happen at the storage layer. Most queries fetch data by an identifier which is only assumed to be valid based on authorization that typically happens at the edge and then everything below relies on that result.

It's not the safest design but I wouldn't say the client should be expected to implement it. That security concern is at the application layer and the actual needs of the implementation can be wildly different depending on the application. You can imagine use cases for redis where this isn't even relevant, like if it's being used to store price data for stocks that update every 30 seconds. There's no private data involved there. It's out of scope for a storage client to implement.
Guess it pays to err on the side of caution for now!
These problems predate ChatGPT. Their API has been on the market for nearly 3 years. And they raised their first $1B in 2019. That's plenty of money and time to hire capable leadership.
Artists and journalists make money. That's not a legal problem.
GPU-like inference performance on CPUs in production for computer vision
Can you achieve GPU-like inference performance on CPUs in production for computer vision and natural language processing tasks by c++ and python ?

onnx runtime , torchscripts , openvino , ncnn , tensorart , ....
>I thought in the 90's

Ah, see that's your problem. It's 2023.
Why is that broken by design? You'll never see content that's in integer scale of its original source anyway. e.g., many Sony cameras have a 6K sensor but downscale (not binning) the image to 4K.

Android btw uses the same type of scaling – you'll just get slightly blurry edges, but that's not much of an issue.

It's much better to have slight blurring around the few rare edges where legacy bitmaps are used.

The alternatives are

1) full-screen blurring, broken gamma correction and wasted performance (e.g. rendering at 2x to display at 1x) of full-screen scaling

2) content that's not the correct scale, making it too small or too large to work with.

I'd much rather have a situation where the 1% of content that uses legacy bitmaps is blurry vs EVERYTHING being blurry.
Most food packaging is made with aluminium. Aluminium is down 30% YoY but up 50% in the past 3 years. It's been a wild ride for manufacturers and they increased prices to handle this. Same with energy, the average cost is 50% up from ~3 years ago. Not just electricity that powers up the factories, but the oil for everything logistics.

If you're Unilever/P&G/Nestlé, what do you do? You start cutting costs (less/worse materials - that's called skimpflation), total production volumes or less volume per product (shrinkflation). You also are not as inclined as before to give out promotions and benefits. The good old "pay 1 take 2" is now "pay 1 take half". Retailers get squeezed because they can't just pass the whole price raise down to the end customer, so they suck it up a little and get less profits. They also had more operational costs, so they get screwed (mostly the people working there). The smaller ones may shut down or get M&A'd, the big ones survive.

To make matters worse, the world is simply unpredictable right now. Post-covid you would expect some categories would go up (deodorants, for example), but then you have a war in Ukraine and a global rise in interest rates. When managers can't predict they go with the worst-case scenarios in their pricing strategies, reinforcing all that's bad.

Personally, I'm saving what I can, investing in inflation-indexed bonds and the occasional "buy the dip" for some select stocks, freezing cooked foods with a month in advance, and being very cautious with any job movements. I hope I'm wrong but I believe that will be the way to go for at least a year, if not more.
Communist countries aren't the only ones with publicly owned utilities.

(The US actually has more public utilities than the UK.)
Simple, either the thread goes dead or if it's still active and no one posts a comment in reply then one's pretty certain that it's been ignored.

And I've noticed the longer my comments the fewer replies they receive.
Seems reasonable to me. I'd probably use it!
No jobs will be safe. In the very, very near future.

GPT-4 is a very capable systems architect and can also implement the code. There are a few tools available to put it in a debug loop. Writing documents is a walk in the park for GPT-4. Emails or Discord chats or even perfectly realistic voice conversations are completely doable (I have that on my website).

At this point it's about connecting things together and looping them properly to automate a very high portion of jobs.

I think the answer is not employment but rather production. Think of something you can leverage these AIs that would be interesting or useful to someone else or some business.

Beyond that things like UBI and generally better integration of technology into government is going to be critical for our survival. Especially decentralized technologies and real-world resource data.
I get the impression that devs are happy about RISCV and willing to port things to it, not so much for POWER. Also China seems to be pursuing RISCV heavily.
I know it’s a concept that is hard to grasp for CCP followers to understand but it is possible to criticize the CCP and past American actions. The U.S. is not a saint. Neither is China.
I believe Google is going to see a major hit and the thing is they can't do anything to stop it. They have an incentive to keep search traffic high and unfortunately for them GPT-4 is so good that it gets answers faster with less ads then Google. It's similar to how Google disrupted other search engines in the late 90s. I'm thinking about how I craft my prompt to get the right answer, similar to how I used to think about how I craft the correct keyword search to get the right answer. I have not even tried via bing.com yet just using chat.openai.com selecting gpt-4 and I find much better answers faster then googling... I still google somethings like: "convert 70F to C"... but for help with coding solutions I just ask gpt4
How did you end up working with them? Super jealous!
Isn't this a charter school? Charters are public. Of course it does sound like it has what some people would describe as a thinly-veiled Christian agenda, but as I understand it, a charter is under the jurisdiction of the school board, which is elected.

I think GP here was saying was more that in general, if the left is fighting against issues that are purely about notification, it's likely a losing battle and they should probably accept/embrace 'parental notification' which has its upsides, and move on to more productive battles.
How the FBI caught the BreachForums admin
Both income and point of sale taxes definitely feed into inflation so I'm not certain why you're trying to draw a distinction between those taxes on productive money and taxes on accumulated wealth (generally unproductive money).
I would also add that your ability to pretend to be the client to the server is also limited, if ssh key based client authentication is used. This means that even if the host key is leaked, an attacker will not be able to push in the name of the attacked client. The attacker will be able to pretend to be the server to the client, and thus be able to get the pushed code from the client (even if the client just added one patch, the attacker can pretend to be an empty repo server side and receive the entire repo.

If ssh token based auth is used, it's different of course, because then the server gets access to the token. Ideally Github would invalidate all their auth tokens as well.

The fun fact is that a token compromise (or any other attack) can still happen any point in the future with devices that still have outdated ssh keys. That's a bit unfortunate as no revocation mechanism exists for ssh keys... ideally clients would blacklist the ssh key, given the huge importance of github.
The nannying is getting annoying. But it's impressive.
It confuses mining (Proof of Work in general) with hashing (The Hashcash PoW algorithm). There's many other PoW algorithms besides Hashcash...
The gap between living standard of poor and rich is much smaller than a few hundred years ago. What you claim cannot possibly be correct.
You are thinking like Argentina's politicians now. Here there are laws to try to have "Just prices" (price controls) https://www.argentina.gob.ar/economia/comercio/preciosjustos And our inflation is over 100% a year.

Many people don't seem to learn from history. When something appeals to their emotions they follow it blindly.
Gell-Mann amnesia...
They stopped caring about what information you want to get and instead give you the information they think you should get. Sometimes it works, sometimes it's just awful.

Not to mention the constant pain that's localization/internationalization as well as some of the queries becoming worse and worse. The service is supposed to become better with time, not the contrary. Plus, of course, all the SEO garbage.
I am very surprised it is that low.
Obviously. It's Sam Altman, not Sam Altruism.