skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
FOSS licenses typically require the preservation of the copyright clause. They are not mainly doing this for attribution rights, but to preserve the licensing terms: copied works (perhaps with modification) are licensed to subsequent users the same way. This has the side effect of discouraging plagiarism, since it's hard to present something as being exclusively your product if someone's copyright license is prominently displayed.

The USA copyright law doesn't mention the word "plagiarism", though there is a small section in it entitled "Rights of certain authors to attribution and integrity". I'm pretty sure FOSS licenses are not relying on this. They rely on the idea that the license lapses if any of its terms are not met. When the license lapses, then the right to redistribute is revoked. A lawsuit revolving around someone removing copyright notices would most liklely be based on unauthorized reproduction (the license to redistribute is not granted to someone who removes the notices), not violating attribution rights (license to redistribute is unconditionally granted, but authors retain attribution rights, which are being stepped on).

Software licenses as a broader class not limited to FOSS do not necessarily discourage plagiarism. In proprietary software, it's common to be able to license a software component on such terms that its authors need not be mentioned anywhere; neither the binary build of the program, nor any accompanying documentation have to display any notices related to the licensed part. If you license parts of a program in this way, and say that you wrote all of it, that is plagiarism. In an academic setting, it could get you disciplined and kicked out of school.

Homework writing services probably license their solutions on similar terms (out of necessity): you may present the purchased solution as your own work.

Free software writers are not mainly concerned with plagiarism. You're encouraged to take a program and make it yours, if it doesn't work the way you want it. You may add your own name to the copyright notice if you make more than just trivial changes, and if you add new files that are not a derived work of the program, you can use your own license for them, provided it's compatible.

Someone who, in redistributing some code, neglected some requirement stated in its free license isn't ipso facto a plagiarist: i.e. isn't guilty of fraudulently presenting the entire program as their sole creation. Situations in which that is the case will be painfully obvious.

Therefore, in summary, it's basically just trolling to throw around the word "plagiarism" when someone made a mistake or oversight in some redistributing use of a program.
Another good alternative is Semantic Kernel - different language(s), similar (and better) tools, also OSS.

https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/
From the article: "The chemicals in bleach “are persistent in the environment, and they’re also very corrosive,” she added."

This seems incomplete at best and disingenuous at worst.

It's my understanding that chlorine bleach breaks down into oxygen, NaCl, and water.

So, sure, you can argue that salt water is persistent in our environment and also corrosive, but that statement strikes me the same way as how people have long warned about the dangers of ever present dihydrogen monoxide in almost everything we consume these days.
Are you against 2fa, or against being compelled to use it? Why?
I think all she did was read remarks during the Q&A when it was her turn. Correction: after the heckling started for the purposes of calming things down, she claims.

In those remarks, in addition to disagreeing in very strong terms with the speaker, she said:

> You are invited into this space. You are absolutely welcome in this space. In this space where people learn and, again, live. I really do, wholeheartedly welcome you. Because me and many people in this administration do absolutely believe in free speech. We believe that it is necessary. We believe that the way to address speech that feels abhorrent, that feels harmful, that literally denies the humanity of people, that one way to do that is with more speech and not less. And not to shut you down or censor you or censor the student group that invited you here. That is hard. That is uncomfortable. And that is a policy and a principle that I think is worthy of defending, even in this time.

I think she has blame for NOT TAKING action against the hecklers. But you seem to be suggesting she actively did things I don't believe that she did.
One of my close friends has been working here for the last few years, it's been exciting watching the journey. Congrats to everyone who made this happen.
This is a secret hidden level.
I wanted a photo of cover crops, and I found this graphic in an unrelated article https://www.google.com/search?q=cover+crop&rlz=1C1CHBF_esAR8... (the article Iinke is behind a paywall :( , but the graphic is clear enough)
But yet not evidence he was convicted of anything but non-violent internet crime.
And Framework already ships a 13" model and parts with Chromebook certification, which has great ARM support.
funny how that works.
A contract in the legal sense requires a counterparty, as well as legality and a benefit to both parties. This is not the same as a "smart contract" which is just a program.
I think OP meant useless for search
Chat can be an interface, but its also essentially a universal programming language which can be put behind (or generate itself) any kind of interface.
The hubris at Google for sitting on their inferior AI chatbot is amusing. They could have been a contender, but decided we weren't ready for an AI chatbot whose main prowess seems to be scraping websites. This is all on Sundar Pichai and he should face the consequences for this and all of his previous failures. With ChatGPT having an API and now plugins I don't see Google catching up anytime soon. Sundar was right about this being a code red situation at Google, but it should have never gotten to this point .
The DEI Dean has just published an op-ed in the WSJ:

Diversity and Free Speech Can Coexist at Stanford

https://www.wsj.com/articles/diversity-and-free-speech-can-c...

I find it surprising that she is doubling down on her "is the juice worth the squeeze" line. In my mind (as a former lawyer), the "juice" is not just the particular speech that was about to be given (which was unrelated to LGBTQ issues, FWIW), but rather free speech rights in general. Of course, the DEI Dean frames it as if the "juice" is much narrower, and therefore easier to outweigh.
No. The main use of cash is as a means for conducting transactions for goods and services.
Students should be skilled in the meta-theory of law as well as legal critique to know the limits of legalism.

What the administration is attempting to do is monopolize the framing of the issue as a legal one. Frame monopolization is inherently an authoritarian practice and unbecoming of a prestigious higher institution.
I'm excited to see what area of chipmaking they tackle next. I'd love to see a 40X speedup in my HDL simulator/compiler or in the timing tools, the placement tools, or the ATPG vector generators. So much of this stuff just limps along today.
"We have reviewed the full report in the context of our own data and believe it’s designed to deceive and confuse investors.

We are a highly regulated public company with regular disclosures, and are confident in our products, reporting, compliance programs, and controls. We will not be distracted by typical short seller tactics."

Wow... they're not even denying anything. It reads like, "What we did is technically all legal".
pretty cool blog post about how fb is using haskell to fight spam.
Software used in medical devices, airplanes, and other applications where mistakes can lead to death does exist, and there has been tragic examples of software bugs killing people:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Therac-25
I wonder how many startups were trying to build something like this and just saw it lunched by OpenAI?
I've seen kernel code from pre and post Windows 8. The pre Windows 8 stuff is generally nice, from what little I saw the post windows 8 stuff looked like features designed by a PM that engineers were forced to implement.

Things were obviously not as well thought out, Windows 8 was, IMHO, a panicked reaction to the rise of tablet sales at the time.
Indeed!
They just keep doing good things (and doing them well from what I read)
Looks like the Intel version is only using P series processors, which have higher multithreaded performance than the U series but are also more power hungry.

Also, DDR4 only which is significantly slower than the DDR5 and LPDDR5 capabilities of the CPU.
I love what framework is doing <3
Much like one of my acquaintances, a professor, sent their students a messages that obtaining copies of their textbooks online, e.g. on Libgen (a list of URLs follows), is not officially approved.
I think it's in really poor taste to compare regulators doing their job shutting down illegal activities and one of the most infamous pogroms, Kristallnacht.
Are you going to cry because a company wants your data to be a bit more safe?
Regardless of how we feel about it wouldn’t that be up to the high schoolers ?
Cows everywhere rejoice.
> especially when it has the collective memory of a goldfish

Any book or podcast recommendations for a long-view historical surmisement?
Real estate isn't. Investing in an LLC with some friends that buys an LLC is then a common enterprise. And if you are a hands off investor, then it's the shares are a security.
This rocks! Well done!

I lost of course. I blame my aggressive clue giver!

The word 'PIRATE' is often associated with 'RELIGIOUS' symbols like the Jolly Roger.

The word 'CELL' is associated with 'ADVENTURE' situations.
I see lots of comments with emotional responses that seem to have the commenter identifying with the judge, and describing the protest as a mob.

It would be useful to look into what the man has actually said and done, the context of the protest, before coming to a decision.

Free speech is important, yes, but so are consequences and context. A justice system that fails to provide justice is worth protesting. Having power is not an excuse for abusing it.

As Angela Davis put it, freedom is a constant struggle, and sometimes that struggle means speaking truth to power.

Sometimes you have to holler.
> It's a circular argument. Businesses don't do business with Business X, so it's too risky for us to do business with Business X.

It isn't a circular argument, running a business is all about risks management, choosing not to do business with people that could be link to sex trafficking mafia is very much effective risk management, that platform can go take their business elsewhere.

This isn't even a partisan issue, prostitution is frowned upon by most payement processors for very objective reasons. It's a non story.
Have you seen LG Gram?
Spent a load of time doing OCR and dealing with its failures... this is absolutely wonderful, thanks for sharing!
This ought to fix a thing or two about its lacking math capabilities as a LLM. Finally it'll get precise and accurate math. It boggles my mind to think of how many ways this will jive with the existing language model capabilities of GPT-4. It's easy to think of these features as isolated islands of features, when they in fact serve to strengthen the coherent whole as the AI.
I would believe that's the case if Narasimhan were working a full shift, but he's only working half a shift once a month. At that point why bother? What are you going to learn in 4 hours a month where all the employees are on their best behavior and the store is made immaculate prior to your arrival?
> I think all she did was read remarks during the Q&A when it was her turn.

She did not read her remarks during the Q&A. She read them before the speaker had a chance to even deliver his speech, which was never given. She gave her pre-written remarks after taking the podium under the guise of being the administrator who was going to calm the situation.
Nothing is tough to cancel; just nuke the credit card and tell them to pound sand.

Never, ever, allow pre-authorized payments out of a bank account. At most, from a credit card. Use a throwaway credit card number if you have that available.

Never share your banking information other than credit card numbers with any vendor.

Whenever signing up to pre-authorized payments is optional, make sure it's easy to revoke before getting into it.

I only do such a thing for my cell plan, which is a monthly pre-paid thing. I can go in there and revoke it at any time. If you have it set on automatic, you get some benefits, like more gigabytes.

If post-dated cheques are an option, that's not a bad way to go. Young people should learn how to write checks. (I'm using both spellings cheque and check here on purpose.)

I pay condo management fees via post-dated cheques. I write them around half a year in advance or so. They cannot cash a cheque before the date written on it. You can ask for unused cheques back: they are physical tokens, using copies of which would be fraud.

Tip: if you're under forty, ask a baby boomer in your family for a run down on cheque writing and cashing.
A customer is going to get banned from all starbucks on his very first shift for being rude.
I sometimes become aware I'm dreaming during nightmares/unsettling dreams and then I'm able to "switch topics" to something more pleasant. I generally forget what I dream about next. I think being able to escape nightmares is a good benefit, but if you don't have nightmares then it's probably not very useful to you.
BARD just gives up on coding questions.
> Sure, fixing the problem is great, but if the CEO needs to personally witness the issue for it to get fixed, then there must be thousands of other issues not being fixed.

If they have a good CEO, they will realize there is an issue with the reporting system and fix that. If not, at least the glaring issue gets resolved, and perhaps someone else is able to use this as evidence to improve the reporting system in the future.
Except transferring cash requires physically moving it, and it is heavy and bulky in large amounts.
This is very impressive. Don't miss clicking the first link[1]

This video feels like a tortured digital twin. Very unnerving action with the mouth. So creepy. But... if you did 5 seconds of full screen and then minimized down into a small circle and had your main content, I bet I wouldn't have noticed. Voice is passable.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=840bHIATbDg
Wonder what would MATLAB's answer be to this
Is it the case in US? I remember looking but couldn't find anything but i was also not sure what exactly i was searching for.
Will ChatGPT replace retro programmers?
Can’t wait to ask it how the universe works.
Emergency Alerts
Same. Maybe a GPT-driven super-tactic.
Yes, it's surprising me how quickly they're moving ahead. It's almost as if this is a plan of staggered launches since some year back coming into fruition. I'm not sure how else they could get weekly major announcements like this.
That's why there will be AMD option.
In what period of time did this convergence of societal viewpoints occur? I think one would have to overlook significant subsets of society at any given time to make that claim.
This is similar to the older discussion about using Photoshop in photography competitions. I think that eventually moved to "everyone photoshops somewhat", which is likely where the AI tools for writing will go.

I mean, how many people use Grammarly? Doesn't that suggest changes to test based on (somewhat) ai?
CodiumAI, debuted TestGPT, and raised $11M, interactive unit-testing
Does an AI-empowered code level testing tool really require its own domain specific model?
It's important to remember that the LLM is not the mask. The underlying AI is a shoggoth[1] that we've trained to simulate a persona using natural language. "Simulate" in the sense of a physics simulator, only this simulation runs on the laws of language instead of physics[2].

Now, of course, it's not outside the realm of possibility that a sufficiently advanced AI will learn enough about human nature to simulate a persona which has ulterior motives.

[1] https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_...

[2] https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/janus-simulators
Is there any way I can interact with a framework laptop before buying it?

I've always loved laptop hardware, something about having all the power of a computer to go seems so freeing to me. forever I've been searching for the 'perfect machine' (granted perfect is relative to the time). ThinkPads were my favourite when IBM owned the brand, and since apple switched to intel nothing came close to the complete package offered by a MacBook.

Recently, I've fallen out of love with the hardware (but OSX is still amazing). Apple had made is so disadvantageous to dual boot Linux that it's not even worth trying, and their own operating system has laughably poor support for gaming. (I get that's not everyone's use case but I feel like it's because they haven't found the right genre of game for them, but that's another tangent, and I'm already rambling). The power of the M1 chip is so great, but what's the point of powerful hardware if you can't run the software you want. So now, after a decade of owning MacBook and loving every moment, I have the itch to find something else.

Framework is one option, but I've never held one, and frankly they look quite ugly/ cheap. My "perfect" device today would be if someone put the internals of the steam deck in an iPad Pro body, but why sell one device when you can sell 3.
anything that communicates over Thunderbolt and fits in the physical module specs

In other words, only the GPU modules that Framework chooses to make.
ChatRWKV
Why "under the guise" as opposed to a good faith and failed effort?
Can you elaborate? What did you learn and what crap did you buy?
Strategy Letter IV: Bloatware and the 80/20 Myth
IANAL but I don’t think that GitHub is violating their ToS here.

L4 says ”GitHub has the right to suspend […] your access […] at any time […]. GitHub reserves the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason at any time.”
And LTT is now hacked. Fun times.
Searching the internet for information about yourself personally. It was very flattering what it said about me (and in fact was mostly wrong) so I tried it on some co-workers as well and they also found it flattering but inaccurate.
Wait, you left out "weaponize." Isn't that the usual term the mob resorts to whenever a principle is cited against them?
The Wolfram plugin also has extremely impressive examples [1].

If I were OpenAI, I would use the usage data to further train the model. They can probably use ChatGPT itself to determine when an answer it produced pleased the user. Then they can use that to train the next model.

The internet is growing a brain.

1: https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/03/chatgpt-gets-its...
Bots Write Jokes
Even for an experienced company losing a couple of flights in the first ten with a new rocket is par for the course. For a new company to get all the way through stage separation before anything went wrong is a sort of vaguely encouraging sign.
Or, tell every store he's coming and everyone will tidy up! You don't even need to send the CEO to any store! /halfsarcasm
The subject of the lawsuit?

It might never see the light of day with an ARM frontend. As for the RISC-V frontend, it must already be many years underway.

When they bought Nuvia, they also got their team, imho most valuable part of the acquisition.

I expect Qualcomm to be among the first to provide SoCs for RISC-V based Android smartphones and RISC-V based Windows laptops.

I also expect them to show up in the datacenter with competitive RISC-V based server chip offerings.
the one thing I still use on a regular basis is the scriptlet that logs me into my university account to access papers
> The alternative is to have 16 decoders, each decoding what an instruction /would/ be if it started at a given byte. These all complete in parallel, but many of them might produce garbage. So we need to find the first five of these that have non-garbage outputs, and /then/ mux those sixteen possible outputs down to five channels. This is doable (and done), but it's a lot more hardware in both decoders and muxing than you might think at first.

Well that just sounds hideously complex.
The credit company should write it into their contract so that it does. The credit card company should send a notification that you cut them off as soon as it happens.
But he’s not exactly _running_ the exchange, is he? I mean, it’d be interesting to see how the SEC asks him to shut it down, and of course that’s actually impossible for him (or anyone really) to do.
Thanks!

- Training code is https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca

- Params were mostly default (as in stanford_alpaca README), except for: per_device_train_batch_size=1, per_device_eval_batch_size=1

- Fine-tuning dataset was based on https://github.com/tloen/alpaca-lora/raw/81eb72f707b0505a03b... with minor improvements; I'm going to publish my version soon

- The training itself took about 3 hours on 8x Nvidia A100 80GB
> we are really bad at actually verifying that code works

This assumes a culture where verification is a virtue. Given the opportunity to cut corners for the sake of KPIs or other management sorcery, it's a virtual certainty that corners will get cut if AI enables it.

> If AI code can fuck you up then so can any junior dev or intern.

And they do. The fact that major corporations routinely have massive data leaks speaks to some serious QC issues.

---

Ultimately, the problem is the long-term brain atrophy due to these tools. There will be too much trust placed in them, colleges will start awarding degrees to people who just "AI'd the answer" and eventually, we have a majority work force who can't tie their proverbial shoes.

It's not tomorrow and hopefully not even a decade. But a generation's worth of dependence on these tools coupled with the employment incentive to do more faster? Boy howdy [1].

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTtBN34AXl0
Well there you go. You don't believe that an AI expressing dangerous ideas represents danger, and you don't believe that astronomical increases in AI abilities represent the advent of AGI. The latter opinion is... well, an opinion you're allowed to have. I don't think it makes sense, but I certainly can't prove otherwise. Literally every human on the planet - rather, all of humanity, only has speculation to go on here.

The former opinion is.. not a great take. First, ChatGPT isn't the only one out there. It's Bing's Sydney which is dehumanizing people and threatening them. Those are dangerous ideas. If a human or a certified AGI expressed those ideas, they would be problematic (see: every genocide in history). So for a non-AGI AI to express those ideas is worrying, even if it can't do act on them right now in a way that's directly harmful.
The Radeon 680M/780M compete pretty well with base M1/M2 GPUs. And there are going to be some 7040 series chips with them like the 7940HS. No, it's not a 16 core monster but I imagine Aya Neo will shove it in a handheld in like 5 months.
> I wonder why this effect was not discovered when screens were first invented and entered the home back in the early 20th century

I wonder why I was required to sit 1.5 meters away from the screen a generation after TV entered the home. Do modern kids sit this far away from tablets?
This is pretty common industry wide. Executives who are actually serious about it will do it silently and without a PR campaign.
Actually, there's probably a fair amount of relatively controlled leaking that goes on. There's a certain amount of boil off of the cryo temp methane. In the video of the launch you can see active flaring in the wide shot. And at various points plumes come off the rocket on the pad, that's venting through pressure relief valves.