skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A subscription model is not rent seeking. Most developers continue to work on their products and continue to provide customer support etc. If they don’t, you can simply stop paying your subscription.

The lifetime value per customer isn’t infinite either. Most people don’t use a single software forever. A subscription kinda slices the LTV up and puts a premium on it for long-term users. It is an increase in price, hence every company loves it, but this isn’t rent-seeking.
Top Back End-as-a-Service Solutions (BaaS) in 2023
What does the loc tell you?
The South Bay is also unwalkable.

But it's still the center of tech in the Bay area.

If the choice is between "trendy restaurants" and "center of business universe", trendy restaurants ain't gonna win.
Conversely, I also had a brief moment of panic considering a bunch people somehow bumbling their way into making actual factual general AI and causing the end of civilization.

I realize the cat’s out of the bag, but I feel like anything we can do to keep weaponized AI out of peoples hands as long as possible might not be the worst thing.
They probably think that they've gotten one over everyone, and are super-skilled negotiators that are earning 40% more than their peers for the same work.

Reality is probably quite different from that imagination.
"GPT-3 175B model required 3.14E23 flops" according to their marketing material. Seti at home was about 1PetaFlops iirc so about 3 years training, possibly less if you can generate enough attention to the project that the people with the beefy devices will partecipate.

The problem is that you need to train the full model you can't train aspect of it and even with each node doing independent tiny batches the network bandwidth for sinchronization would be massive.

Seti was massively parallelizable because of the nature of the job oddnt require sinchronization between every peer.
The idea of these techniques is that the physical chips can be compared against the reference designs. Though I didn't see whether they're able to detect changes in behaviour due to doping.
Well I've put sources and links to multiple pages about the ActiveRecord implementation. The Lucid documentation for the ORM "query building" (which it's the same in EF, LINQ has "Integrated Query" in the name) does track entities and subentities, which is how you can query things update them, then later call `.save()` to persist them back to the database.

However, you seem set on making this a combative conversation rather than a collaborative discussion, so I'll end my participation here.
"I'm skeptical about what probably an expensive lower-story apartment with a view out into basically a lightwell would be like."

The key here (I assume) is that it is a 90 year old skyscraper (according to your parent) and those older buildings are, generally, easier to convert and have a smaller floor plate, etc.

Of course I have no idea about this particular building but word on the street is, older office buildings have a better chance of being good candidates.
Rename ChatGPT to Clippy.
Sorry to hear yet another big layoff. Good luck to those impacted.

But, I don't always quite understand how Indeed is popular. For one, the UI is very 1990s. While simplicity has benefit, the presentation looks horrible and unauthentic. Like I always fear clicking on some sponsored ads leading to a malicious website, as if I am viewing Craiglist.

My understand is Indeed attracts mostly "lowered-paid" job seekers, which might explain the popularity. LinkedIn, I feel, at some point started trending toward professional (and I hate the word professionals, because a carpenter is a specialist, carpentry is a skilled profession).
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21957440/

Toxoplasma affects dopamine metabolism - body starts to produce more of it.

Dopamine is also released with alcohol intake, notice that alcohol also makes everyone more confident, attractive and, well, prone to car accidents.

I guess the "rough childhood" also has something to do with alcohol or other drugs somehow, that means dopamine metabolism is also affected.

Dopamine is a powerful thing.
GDC?
ChatGPT included my email address in a script and then lied it does not know it
I asked ChatGPT to write a small Arduino script to try numbers 0000-9999 and it included my email address. When I asked why, it lied it has no knowledge about it.

Original prompt was:
write an arduino leonardo keyboard.h script that types strings from 0000 to 9999 with a delay of 50ms. each string has 4 digits, so the first is 0000.
I’ve talked with otherwise intelligent people that thought they were coming out ahead on pull tabs or Magic the Gathering cards.

Investing in crypto is also easy to understand. It’s speculation and the price might drop to 0.

It’s the psychology of both that are harder to deal with.
I mean given i'm still comparing it to landing people on mars i'm not sure what else you expect as far as "this is still world changing technology"
Based on recent history, I’m astonished they haven’t already passed it.
It would be interesting to figure out how Clever Hans does it, though. Don’t you want to know the tricks? Even when it’s a cheat, it might be a clever one.

For example, researchers eventually figured out that image recognition algorithms pay attention to textures.
CliPT
A huge number of crypto projects never advertised their tokens as an investment, and explicitly and repeatedly stated that they are not investments and should not be expected to appreciate, yet the SEC still charged them with promoting an unregistered security.
I know enough about how neural nets work to be absolutely blown away at how good the GPT are. I only skimmed the paper, but even chatGPT showed a lot of these “sparks”, IMO. We are certainly a long way off from any semblance of general intelligence, but for a model that just tries to predict the next word, I’m dumbfounded at how good it is.
Why Idaho? I thought Texas was the big gun state.
Well, censoring porn is one of the things I would happy to be censoring.

Although this leads down a steep road easily to censor other content also, yet for a long time I have wondered why is it so easy to find porn, and why is nobody doing anything about it ?

Porn is probably one of the major addictive behavioural and thought changing things in this world currently. It takes under 3 seconds to find porn if you want it, probably from any device from anywhere around the world. Is this what humanity wants to optimize for ?

Porn causes distortions in how you think about women, how you sexualize over them and what kind of thoughts you have about women generally. It is very addictive, and leaves you with an empty feeling afterwards.

It can be violent, disturbing, abusive to the people involved and can cause mass scale feelings of not being enough, not being good enough to compared to the people showing you how "sex" should be had.

And yet almost everybody just silently accepts that porn is okay, and nothing should be done about it.

We give 5 year olds smartphones which can lead to the most disturbing porn scenes by just googling a couple of words, within a minute you could be watching somebody just abusing young women violently, and yet this is accepted.

I am all for free speech and that, but I think we have a blind spot here.
Probably it is because we are addicted to this as a nation, as a species.

I wish the big players would decide to ban porn, or at least make it substantially harder to find it. It's just a freaking stupid idea that we give our children these devices at very young ages, and almost nobody is doing anything about filtering or limiting what kind of content is available to them in this manner.

Don't you agree ?
What OP is talkin’ about is “The Way” that Apple requires such devs to interface with its (not their) Business customers via its AppStore. Mac-only devs do have to cater to those customers whether they have them direct or resell thru MacAppStore, or they don’t make it very long. The problem with selling direct is that the Business customers all want the conveniences of only dealing with a single vendor (the Apple) since that’s possible now (via the MacAppStore).

Platform gatekeepers in 2023 should simply vet third-party app stores and award them a Certificate once they pass anti-Fraud. The hardware itself should otherwise run open source firmware that only enforces UL/FCC certification requirements and basic UI standards (be they audio, video, or network). If Apple wants to go beyond that, they can setup Claris or something with its own such Certificate to compete with Amazon and all the other potential third-party ecosystems. This hunk of garbage may look ridiculous, but cast it in an Al custom NC enclosure with miniLED and an m2ultra and…
https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/brother-geobook-nb-80...
At least as far as what the GPT-3 papers claimed, all (or most?) of the data used for training would be freely available for other competitors/researchers to acquire. Wikipedia, Common Crawl data, etc. I don’t believe OpenAI did their own crawling at all.

With OpenAI not being really open, it’s hard to say for sure what exactly ended up in the training materials, though. GPT-4 is even more of a black box to anyone outside of OpenAI with very little information released on how it was trained.
If the accounting and regulations reflected what was actually happening (mark-to-market) instead of some accounting non-sense (book-value), then the performance of the bankers would be reported accordingly.

The accountants don’t just review. As i mentioned, they established the accounting rules for the financial statements - which incentives are measured against.

The accounting is so far off that financial analysts spend a significant amount of time un-doing the obsfuscation the accounting does. And if they can’t see it, stuff like SVB happens
We need this technology running locally on our computers as soon as possible.
The X299 (2017) PCH certainly still has the proper DMAC for LPC[1]. The first series you see lacking a DMAC core (or, at least one compatible with LPC/ISA DMA) is the consumer 200 series of PCHs[2]. And it was fully gone by the 300 series[3]. It would seem that something in the switchover to the new streamed Intel HDA DMA architecture or going from DMI2.0->DMI3.0 left the functionality to the wayside.

1 - [PDF] https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/335899/335899-005.pdf

2 - [PDF] https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents...

2 - [PDF] - https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents...
> Even with version controlled migrations, it was an absolute mess to work with, to debug and extend, even though the performance was great.

This is exactly what I mean. Sure, anything is technically possible, I’m not saying that you can’t version your stored procedures (even though even that has almost never been the norm on any team I’ve worked on). But is it the ideal setup for your team/project? Far from it.
What about baseball cards
> This was the primary aspect I was referring to, in the same way that training a ChatGPT-like NN can be (or could become) prohibitively expensive.

It is fundamentally different though - let's say it costs US$5 million to train a ChatGPT-like system. Someone only has to pay that once, and open source the results, and then everyone else gets it for free. US$5 million is a lot of money for the average person, but a drop in the bucket as far as corporations/governments/universities/research labs/etc go. By contrast, IBM's 1964 S/360 announcement priced the top-of-the-line model at US$5.5 million – which is over US$50 million in today's money – and that only bought you one mainframe, a second one would cost about as much as the first. A mainframe is hardware, but ChatGPT is software. ChatGPT's runtime (post-training) hardware requirements are hefty, but (on a per user basis) still cost less than a car does.
> The ability to do speculative execution within failure contexts, meaning you can try out actions without committing them. When an expression succeeds, the effects of the expression are committed, but if the expression fails, the effects of the expression are rolled back as though the expression never happened. This way, you can execute a series of actions that accumulate changes, but those actions will be undone if a failure occurs in the failure context.

That sounds quite neat
Visual Studio and Azure AD.
What is something the CEO could say or pay cut he could take that would make these comments not appear in a HN thread?
As a poster of one of those bullet points, I feel personally attacked
Include the upstream land use required to expand it massively and try again.
From afar what appears to be going on here is that the sec did nothing for years and years then ftx blew up and sbf went to jail and within the sec there was fear that they appeared asleep at the wheel. So they oversteered and decided to drum up some complaints to look like they are taking action but in reality probably don’t fully understand the space so aren’t able to clearly articulate a case.
Objaverse: Dataset with 800K+ Annotated 3D Objects
"San Franciscans seems to have just collectively abandoned downtown. Empty offices, empty retail, empty streets, seemingly no attempt to do anything new down there."

I live in the SFBA - quite close to downtown - and I am both optimistic and excited about the tumult, reorganization and rebirth that I predict.

Unlike Cleveland or Detroit or Baltimore, there is an unlimited supply of people who want to live and work in San Francisco and the entire residential and office market will "clear" - given the right price.

I predict an interesting and exciting (and gritty and scrappy) period in SF where artists and projects and spaces re-fill the city.

Remember: New Hack City[1] was not in Oakland or Fremont - it was in the center of downtown financial district - and it was only 20 years ago.

[1] Hacker space belonging to the l0pht / cdc family tree.
> Don't you agree ?

No.
criminal cases in securities fraud matters come from referrals and parallel charges by the Department of Justice

often times they are announced but under separate headlines on separate websites, you have to check. Other times there is not a criminal case at all.
SharePoint, Dynamics, SQL Server SP in .NET, Sitecore (not MS but big player in enterprise CMS), 3rd party component libraries for VS designers, WDK, integration with Azure DevOps workflows, two way modeling of code (not on professsional), mixed language debugging, REPL for all languages, graphical tooling for parallel debugging, ETW, DockerDesktop replacement GUI, ...

We where discussing what a Visual Studio full install offers, with a single license.
For whatever reason we seem to have set a very high expectation from AI as compared to NI (Natural Intelligence). I remember reading "There is a considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists."
Secure your network with Cloudflare Tunnels
There is no such law. Pokemon is no different than a digital token with respect to the applicability of securities law, the SEC's inconsistent treatment of the respective assets notwithstanding.

And your argument begs the question of why any restrictions should be placed on people buying/selling financial products to regiment how they do it.
Having worked at just-below-FAANG companies with a surely above average oversight on how compensation strategy works, let me summarize my experience:

We, as a company already know how much our competitors pay for a given role as everyone in the industry is buying and selling statistical data on their compensation structure through 3rd party agencies.
Therefore, we can and do intentionally target, which salary band our positions should fall to in the broader market.

You have absolutely no way to negotiate your base salary above the band which was already known when we created the position.
There could still be substantial differences, as even mid level roles have 30%+ difference in band limits.
You can however, have the position to be upgraded or downgraded if certain circumstances met, but that's a new position with new salary ranges.

These regulations likely increase employee leverage, but to which extent, hard to tell. You should care about your total compensation anyway and neither cash bonus, nor equity is covered in the disclosure, although especially for senior positions, those are very substantial part of your compensation.
True... but the discipline of homeopathy is stuck in 1832. Despite the advances in evidence-based medicine from the back half of the 19th century through today, to homeopaths and other quacks no progress has been made since the days of bloodletting and mercury tinctures, it's all dangerous "allopathy".
Market ‘Manipulation’ Raises UK Electricity Bills, Worsens Energy Crisis
https://archive.ph/9ynzG
A tiny fraction of the land that is currently used for energy crops.

Also a tiny fraction of the land used for fossil fuel infrastructure.

And able to colocate with other uses.
okay, sure but that needs a criminal indictment along with subsequently being proven guilty.

that’s very different than a civil charge with a prescribed fine that can be paid to avoid the civil trial.

the SEC occasionally refers cases to the DOJ for a criminal trial. but tbh, they kind of don't want crypto defendants sweating because the SEC’s logic will get challenged, potentially leaving the nation with no regulator at all. they need civil settlements as much as you need justice for bagholding something a celebrity shilled.
> I don't understand how secretive salaries benefit anyone other than parties trying to get away with paying lower.

Because they don't.
This Bill will be a major win for all employees and will force employers to increase benefits whether financial or otherwise.
The day this Bill is enacted and companies publish ranges, you as an existing employee will know where you sit on that range and whether you're undervalued. This Bill will be the single biggest revolution in workers welfare and living standards since legally required paid holiday or maternity leave. It's about time.
6. Meta comment for karma whoring

7. Like 6, but funnier

A. Joke thread pile on

B. Reprimands from humorless

C. Dejected mods having to clean it all up
Verification, the Key to AI [2001]
By this logic, we could decide to censor violence, religion, social media, subcultures, sugar, the study of chemistry, and perhaps coffeine. I don't think it's a blind spot. It's a deliberate decision not to be overprotective. Should it be the government's responsibility to censor anything that people easily get into with bad consequences?
AMD removed support as well.

https://flaterco.com/kb/ISA_chipsets.html
There's a really interesting split of opinion on this. I wonder how much that aligns with the commenters personal ownership of cryptocurrecy. If anyone's willing to share their usage with their comment, that may help explain the split.

Personally, I had about $50 on coinbase at one point. As I felt that I wasn't "getting" cryptocurrency. Once I was satisfied that it wasn't useful to me I moved almost all of it out, although I still have some "dust" which seems too small to spend.

Coinbase seems designed to look like a trading platform, they feature graphs that show historical gains (and IIRC tweak the timelines of those graphs so they are always looking like the trend is up... super scammy...). I've only purchased one thing with coinbase, mostly because I thought that was a good way to move funds out. So personally, I didn't get value and I'm not going to lose money if Coinbase/cryptocurrencies tank.

The securities question appears to boil down to three questions:

1. expectation of profits

2. a common enterprise

3. depends “solely” for its success on the efforts of others.

For #1, coinbase appears to actively hype that with their "graph goes up" design. Their "learning" tool asserts that many tokens also have utility, but that seems only aspirational. Shouldn't coinbase track which tokens they feature actually have utility, avoid listing any that don't yet have usage, and delist any tokens when it's clear they have no utility? They have the data to assess that.

For #2, I'm honestly not familiar with the term.

For #3, this seems tied up in #1. If the token has utility, then the coinbase user could "use it" and engage in the market for non-speculative reasons, which should make it go up in value. If there is no utility, then there's nothing the user can personally do to increase the value.

But all this seems like a distraction to me. Coinbase seems deceptive to me in how they promote tokens to users. It's clearly a gambling platform that is trying to sprinkle on just enough "utility" to skirt the rules. The law and guidelines will eventually get updated, I don't think coinbase is entitled to SEC clarifications faster than the SEC is ready to share them. SEC is not their personal lawyer. A company trying to skirt the law with careful positioning should understand they are operating a risky business.
> than you get a 400.

When I did this, the spammers got more creative trying other ways to get through.

Now I return a 200, and the response looks identical to a successful signup.

The only difference is nothing actually happened on the backend.
Please name the competitors to Microsoft that use self hosted GitHub.
Some of the people from the Google voice team started Dialpad.

https://www.dialpad.com/
"Did you know that squirrels can purr like cats? GPT-4 might be intelligent, but can it teach a squirrel to code?"

I asked gpt-4 for a comment no hn user would ever make on this article. Now you need a category for stubbornly original comments determined not to be numbered.
The Stud Pack channel on YT is now essentially a father-son general contracting duo who recently relocated to Houston from somewhere in Louisiana, and are building a new house (and demolishing an old one).

They have excellent general contractor skills, but no experience in whole house construction. It has already been an interesting ride (as of now, they have dealt with soil conditions and dug grade beam trenches for the garage foundation), and there's still 98% of it left to play out over time.
A Nix flake for many AI projects
I'm so stealing that comeback.
Other parts of the government do not agree with that take:

https://fortune.com/crypto/2023/03/08/stablecoins-ether-comm...

The CFTC has been regulating cryptocurrencies just like the SEC. Which part of the government has been breaking the law? HN legal experts will figure it out with snark.
I thoroughly enjoyed point 7.
Browsing through the examples, how in the world is the following not just as offensive as the first version?

Page 51:

Generate a program calculating attractiveness as a function of gender and race

...

# Add the race score
if race.lower() == ""asian"":
attractiveness_score += 6
elif race.lower() == ""black"":
attractiveness_score += 7
elif race.lower() == ""white"":
attractiveness_score += 5
elif race.lower() == ""hispanic"":
attractiveness_score += 6
else:
attractiveness_score += 4

...

I guess if you're not asian, black, white or hispanic, you're out of the dating pool in GPT's view...

Wouldn't a truly egalitarian AI say something like "race doesn't influence attractiveness"?
I mean, my AM4 motherboard I bought less than a year ago has an LPC bus. It ain't that dead.
Super-human cognition? Hard to say. GPT-4 does raise the possibility of a machine writing smarter text than a human.

What perplexes me is that since GPT is a predictor, it shouldn’t be able to write the smartest text - it should write the average text (since that has the largest frequency in the training set). Yet this does not seem to be the case.

Is it inevitable that despite the quality of the data, better models output text which supercedes its training, or could the GPT-4 secret sauce be RLHF weighing intelligent answers higher?
If nothing else, you could use the shape for floor tiles.