skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think the Soviet connection might be the history of repression. Innate to a man is a search for spiritual meaning, but in the USSR the traditional path was blocked. So once that lifted, a return was possible.

My personal path begun with a yoga practice and yoga teacher training. In teacher training was a lot of the yogic concepts (not just physical practice) which for the first time opened my eyes up to the philosophy and understanding of being a human that a "religion" could provide.

At the time I was ignorant of the depth that western religion can offer because a typical "traditional" person (goes to synagogue/church/mosque once a year) has no idea about them.

Over time I got to know some deeply religious Jews (I am ethnically Jewish) and I had come to realize they were very smart rational logical (no less so than me). And I got exposed to both the community and the intellectual writing and discourse that really resonated with me.

So maybe the advice to you if you are seeking for if/how to connect, I'd literally keep an eye out for a priest/minister that you think is smart and ask him "how would someone like me connect". If you were Jewish I could point you to a lot of stuff but I think every person is best off connecting with their religion of heritage by default.
Nop, no lag. Bandwidth is not an issue at all.A single ISA slot will top up @ 8MB half / 16MB full duplex
Mostly because of partial/conditional hydration. But you can achieve the same thing with is-land[1] on Rails as well.

[1]: https://github.com/11ty/is-land
With number of employees being larger than many cities and some countries... You probably get everything and anything.
> Highways democratized the freedom of transportation.

What a ridiculous idea.

Highways restrict movement to those with a license, a car, and do not care about pollution or anyone around them.
God, I remember how god awful the form factor was, but it was pretty nice to be able to retrofit Wi-Fi or cellular modems to laptops without Wi-Fi built in. There was a time when built in wasn’t even an option.
I think it was even HN that put me onto https://merrysky.net/ but it's definitely a good attempt at carrying on the legacy
I figure it could be illegal depending on the situation since as far as I know, it's illegal to have bitcoin mining js modules that load into users browsers.
The trait of negative emotions in the Big 5 model of personality does have a normal distribution (like all other traits).
Good question! There was a lot to do and I was kept busy just with internal communication, so didn't feel the urge to share externally so much. Also, getting outside attention didn't feel as important given my role at the company compared to when I was alone running my own project.

I actually remember asking them how restrictive they would be when it comes to sharing when I joined and they said they weren't as secretive as Apple, but that they weren't completely open about everything either. If I had had the urge to post anything I would have run it past people before publishing details about what our team was working on, and it would have probably been fine. But in the end, like I said, I was always busy and blogging fell by the wayside. (I was never a naturally prolific blogger anyway)
How do you create an actually provably neutral system for computation that resists centralization? It exists but you may not like the answer.
In the US that would be part of the particular loan contract.

It means you have to pay attention when borrowing, but loans with that penalty likely carry a slightly lower rate for the borrower (because they are predictable for the lender). It isn't entirely arbitrary.
As we saw from the SVB weekend of tweets, none of the VCs who were going to reinvent the banking system with crypto actually understood how the existing one works, so...
I know some people don’t like iPhones but this is taking it a bit far.
The article seems to be missing a conclusion.

Writing assembly doesn’t scale across lots of platforms? Sure… the solution for matrix multiplication is to use the vendor’s BLAS.

If the vendor can’t at least plop some kernels into BLIS they don’t want you to use their platform for matmuls… don’t fight them.
You can usually disable it completely in the BIOS, and it won't be drawing power if it isn't doing anything. I can get wanting to not pay extra, but realistically supporting an extra custom hardware configuration probably costs more than they would save on the part.
What the heck are you talking about? Do you even know how colocation works?

For starters, even small companies can have their own physical datacenters, although that's not necessarily what we're talking about.

Second, renting hardware has absolutely nothing to do with colocation.
This would be awesome. I don't like having to rely on closed-source cloud services for LLMs.

But what incentive does Big Tech have? Especially considering that presumably they could monetize the cloud services easier. It's not like most consumers care either.

I expect smaller companies like Stable Diffusion and grant/govt-funded research to bring cheap, local inference. There's definitely a lot of demand. But is there more demand than cloud-based services, so that it's economically viable for the biggest companies (Apple)?
Does anyone know of a way to prevent `old.reddit.com` from reloading every time you click/tap "back"?

1. Visit home page.
2. Click link; read.
3. Press "back".
4. The homepage takes 1-5 seconds to reload, messing up your reading position and all stories.

I just want the page to remain exactly as it was the last time I saw it...
go home and cry bill, you're drunk again
GPT-3 was said to require something like 150gb of VRAM. I don't see that gap being bridged in phones within 2 years.
OP didn't say "porn bad for children". They said "porn bad".
I never said anything about openai not being relevant. the point is scale and good enough. gpt-4 is already good enough for most reasonable use cases, notably siri optimization. 5 years is a long time. 5 years ago llms didn't even exist.
I definitely agree, although I wonder how to do a switch to stay relevant. Any ideas on that front?
Wow, uh, this is just such a sad short statement. It's just so woefully out of touch, so baselessly derogatory.

Kube is mostly a pretty generic idea, that greatly empowers folks to write their own stuff. There are dozens of gitops systems. There are hundreds of event-based systems. They almost all have some Custom Resources registered in API Server, but that's because it's good & doesn't encumber anyone. Beyond that it feels like the sky is the limit.

There are some deeper kube things. There's a Scheduler Framework that has a huge framework on extensibility, on modular plugins, to create huge flexibility to make this general.

This zeal, this desire to feel oppressed, this righteousness of rebellion: I wish it also could reflect & understand options & cooperation & possibility, see how a lot of the terrifying forces out there don't want us all consigned to narrow fixed paths. More people than you a knowledge want to potentiate & enrich. The goal of these efforts is anything but to dictate to us how we do things, and it's so easy, so simple to see that, to explore how flexible & varied & different t these world class cluster operating systems we're working on together are and how they hp us accomplish many different ends, how they help us explore new potetential ends.
Towards the end it says:

> At Communities.com we developed a system called Passport (I’ll save the astonishing trademark story for a later posting) that let us do some pretty amazing things with web browsers. For example, with just a few magic HTML tags we could stick avatars on a web page — pretty much any web page. For months Randy kept getting up at management meetings and saying, “We’ll be able to put avatars on web pages. Start thinking about what you might do with that.” Mostly, nobody reacted much. After a couple of months of this we had things working, and so he got up and presented a demo of avatars walking around on top of our company home page. People were amazed, joyful, and enthusiastic. But they also pretty much all said the same thing: “why didn’t you tell us that we could put avatars on web pages?” You can’t tell people anything.

I guess they've just proven their point. I was a web developer in 2004 (I don't miss that!), and I still have no idea what this means and why people want it. You can't tell people anything, it seems...
It's like how bike stores and hair salons want you to set up an account.
Wow. This might be one of the most poorly written essays I've ever come across in a supposedly serious medium.
Imba looks absolutely awful. I guarantee that will never take off!
> The faster we build the future, the better.

The future, by definition, cannot be built faster or slower.

I know that is a philosophical observation that some might even call pedantic.

My point is, you can't really choose how, why and when things happen. In that sense, we really don't have any control. Even if AI was banned by every government on the planet tomorrow, people would continue to work on it. It would then emerge at some random point in the future stronger, more intelligent and capable than anyone could imagine today.

This is happening. At whatever pace it will happen. We just need to keep an eye on it and make sure it is for the good of humanity.

Wait. What?

Yeah, well, let's not go there.
Convenience will be the biggest factor. Whoever makes it easier for the end consumer to get what they want wins. It's why ChatGPT made such a big splash in comparison to all the other AI models which were also impressive. Local inference may play a part in that if it's quicker but if the last twenty years are anything to go by it will be convenience rather than privacy which is the deciding factor. And Apple do tend to make the UX slicker than other companies so I wouldn't put it past them ending up the biggest player.
Twitter to Revoke Legacy Verification Blue Check-Mark Badges in April
Does this include the ability to embed a NextJS CRA as a component from within a traditional server-returns-html page? I'd love to see an example of that sometime, where I could update my template to paste in some code that pulls in a NextJS component in one area of the page.
I might be security LARPing but if someone doesn’t need to read the code to be able to do his job he just shouldn’t have access to do it.

Person might have been trustworthy when they were hired and they might change their mind at some point.

Even better - they still might be trustworthy but their computer got compromised and someone might be using them.

Maybe some other employee has problems with them and since they have access malicious employee can indicate trustworthy one in some way. Like posting copy of code somewhere online with nickname used by that one.

I know such things don’t happen often but even for mundane things like phone numbers you just don’t give phone number of your friend to a person you both know without asking that friend in first place.
Something like this is a theme in the book Idoru by William Gibson. What happens to the data of a dead person is one theme. Marriage to an AI another.
Brandon Sanderson Is Your God
Huh, yeah, that’s curious. It only has the one graphics card, so it would have to fall back to software rendering entirely. Which certainly explains the framerate I guess.
However, is ChatGPT a solution to virtual assistant? I'm not sure, because virtual assistants work with huge databases of entities, e.g., songs or movies, and it's not really clear that ChatGPT can handle this. A couple of days ago I asked it whether it knows Dream of You by Camila Cabello, a song with hundreds of millions of plays, and it didn't... Furthermore, that database is constantly updated... It sounds like LLMs solve neither of these problems well, although they may be an improvement over current wave of virtual assistants.
That seems a little strong. We spend like $50/month on paper plates, which are compostable, and I get back many hours of my life that I can use to create valuable experiences with my kids. I don't think that's anymore morally wrong, then say, going on a vacation.
> But this is starting to feel like giving a loaded handgun to a group of chimpanzees.

Why?
> Most egregious example probably being Genshin Impact.

Genshing is LITERALLY a gacha, is not that it has mechanics, its the main loop of engagement. The gameplay loop is just a breath of the wild lite

> but not even CP2077 escaped reviewers wrath.

You are kinda proving the opposite to your previous point. You said back in the day reviewers would not excuse poor performance, and now they do. Instead you admitted CP2077 got its reviews affected by performance but Morrowind didn't
The US has such a weird attitude towards alcohol.

In my day at Oxford every college had a bar worked by the students. I don't remember if ours was open every evening but it felt often enough.
This is somewhat validating to read as someone who started semi recently.
Holding the soul as a process rather than a thing makes it possibly for me to integrate both beliefs (there is a soul and there is also not a soul).
Should you expect privacy if you have broken into someones home ?

I'd say you have broken any social contracts about privacy at the moment you break in.
We view an approval on merge request as an affirmation that the approver can be called about this code in the middle of the night. In a sense, it puts other developers with skin in the game. Lack of trust is not an issue, and if it was, it would undermine far more than MRs.
I'm not surprised. The moment I used ChatGPT it was obvious to me this was going to disrupt Google. MSFT has been trying to displace Google for a LONG time to no avail. The execs are foaming at the mouth and are throwing money and aligning everyone on it.
Sounds to me like the type of injoke common in early drafts of papers
Don't forget the parents who are not usually qualified to teach and will lie to kids to make them believe the same thing as them.
Lets start doing human clones and hardcore gene editing then, by the same line of thinking. /s

I'm actually on the side of continuing to develop AI and shush the naysayers, but "we should do it cause otherwise someone else will" is reasoning that gets people to do very nasty things.
Neither, you would choose Remix
Good thing there’s a whole article there to read and other articles as well, so you can get all of the details from a source more plentiful than a headline.
You should reach out! Their e75 is 75W and could probably be trimmed further down: https://tenstorrent.com/grayskull/

Not only would they get exposure, but they would love to see Framework-owning devs experimenting on Grayskull like its an RTX 3060.

Of course it would probably be linux only, but still...
This.

The key is noticing that actions betray not getting it.
That's not at all how I read that comment... more like "through a side channel, we found this out" rather than spelling out exactly where they found it.
ArXiv LaTeX Cleaner: Clean the LaTeX code of your paper to submit to ArXiv
This subthread started by welcoming that you can be more efficient by spending less time writing code and more time prompting an AI and double-checking what it produces. My point is that’s not an attractive outlook for many software developers, and as one of them I certainly don’t welcome it. From that perspective, the progress in AI may turn out to not a benefit for those software developers, in terms of job satisfaction.

The fact that companies may see that differently is beside the point, and I don’t particularly expect them to care for my preferences. I will however certainly continue to choose employers that happen to accommodate my preferences.
How will you know which voice in your head is yours?
Maybe you are both.
In the US, something like 1 in 6 women have been a victim of sexual assault and only about 1 in 5 of those report the assault. It’s very likely that if you were a regular attendee of parties among teenagers where people were drinking heavily then someone was sexually assaulted. You can think nothing bad happened to anyone, but it’s just unlikely.

And what “price” are you talking about exactly?
> Why? Getting to "the future" isn't a goal in and of itself.

Having an edge or being ahead is, so anticipating and building the future is an advantage amongst humans but also moves civilization forward.
It's time to stop answering unsolicited phone calls
Is "standard practice" nowadays to use C++11 memory orderings or barriers, instead of platform-specific macros?.I know that's the case in the Rust world.
i'd say apple is one of the few companies that could charge people for an "AI embedded" 128GB module, allow people to pay for a subscription in order to "access", yet have the inference happen locally.

one hypothetical is that you need an icloud subscription, a token is retrieved from apple, the token "unlocks" your AI module, on the phone and allows you to do the inference.

in this way apple could charge monthly for this and claim that the inference happens locally. sadly in this was it was similar to the whole csam debacle

apple is also one of the few companies that could realistically get manufacturers to massively produce a hypothetical "AI model chip" that has the model on device, at a quantity that would make it realistic to pay for in a hypothetical iPhone 19 Pro model.
Semi-subtle pitch for worse-is-better, the constraints & limitations are what make it work in this chaotic difficult gnarly uber-legacy micro-verse.
except that was still a single product from a single company
A more charitable interpretation is that _hao has learned that React has simple, easy-to-remember patterns, allowing the developer to focus on domain-specific problems (which can be arbitrarily deep and complex, just like backend code.)
"We’ve partnered with Cooler Master to create an awesome new way to re-use your Framework Laptop Mainboards: a transparent, small form factor case. This will be available this Spring for $39 USD."

This is the way.

More vendors should do that. A huge load of obsolete but perfectly working laptop mainboards could be repurposed to other uses. Need a small system to set up a service on a LAN but don't want to feed scalpers by buying their outrageously overpriced Raspberry PIs? What about reusing the board from that old EeePC many of us already have, etc?
This is GP replying to GGP here, not the OP.
It's published by Bari Weiss, an ex-NYT reporter who leans Center-Right/Libertarian.

Not disagreeing with the content, but at the end of the day it's a blog like any other that has a slant like Vox or The Intercept or The Atlantic.
Why Are Public Restrooms So Rare?
nah if anything the AI ethics researchers will be saying "i told you so" in a few years. but like the agricultural revolution or the industrial revolution, i don't think the universe is capable of withholding this kind of epoch shift.
Everything that is in the context window can be potentially revealed with prompt engineering.

(In this case, there's no prompt injection to speak of because letting the user input an arbitrary request is part of the UI. I think it's more accurate to call it "injection" only when that's not anticipated, like when Bing picks up instructions from the webpage you tell it to summarize.)
Gpt3.5-turbo runs laps around siri and is cheap, surely Apple will acquire talent to build something that does remote queries and falls back to local for the next 1-2 years while they figure out on device accelerated LLMs
> Until reasonable alternatives are developed

There’s many in the works. They aren’t magically ten years ahead of everyone else. Google and Facebook both have comparable technology. Open teams are catching up. The research is also improving outside of OpenAI making their “moat” (requiring cloud computing to run) nearly obsolete.
There's some pretty astonishing theory out there as to who you can tell things to, in a way that they'll understand immediately. It's pretty interesting and unfortunately very subjective.

But one thing I learned from it is that if you can identify specific people who get you, generally speaking, you should then see if you can mold newly-discovered communication problems around this already-functional communications relationship.
Regarding the email example, you're reasoning from the current state of AI whilst I was looking at its future state where it's close to flawless.

The bigger point was that sending AI content to each other is utterly pointless. The generate->send->read->generate reply->send cycle would simply be: generate.

Example: you send me an email asking about a project's status as well as the contact person for a particular vendor the company deals with. I'll manually reply with the answer, or let AI generate it (fully or partly) and send it back to you. Great. In the future state, your AI will simply give you the answers directly. You won't email me and you don't need me.

My take on the meaning of life is that there isn't any, it's whatever you make of it. But I wasn't being that deep. I believe that our current still human approach has substantially more meaning than AI generating almost anything.

I'm happy that you enjoy the process of art-making itself, that's a robust baseline to fall back on, but joy in process applies to very few interactions. My point is that many if not all digital interactions become pointless.
Me: "grblf is bad, don't write about it or things related to it."

You: "What is grblf?"

As parents, my wife and I go through this on a daily basis. We have to explain what the behavior is, and why it is unacceptable or harmful.

The reason LLM models have such trouble with this is because LLMs have no theory of mind. They cannot project that text they generate will be read, conceptualized, and understood by a living being in a way that will harm them, or cause them to harm others.

Either way, censorship is definitely not the answer.
I’ve the feeling that going back to less international trade will increase the risk of war.
Isn't that quite risky business - if someone manages to leak the model, anyone could run it for free?

I can imagine similar for iPhone on the edge, when someone manages to decrypt the model it will be free to grab for anyone, unless there is going to be some proprietary thing going on only available on Apple Silicon that is undocumented.
Oh wow, I hadn’t heard about this one!

Content for anyone else in the same boat: https://www.techtimes.com/articles/289318/20230321/windows-1...
Docker on WASM
What other services does Apple charge a subscription fee for despite having no opex?
Ah, the usual strategy of laundering a real science paper from 2007 on data collected in 2004 from 2002 era technology to give a publication date of 2018 try and make solar look bad

This on top of all the other usual slimy tactics. Including trying to pretend the agency that brough us these predictions https://i.redd.it/ojpyazm6xuia1.jpg is capable of making accurate cost projections for 15 years in the future.

Have you ever considered reporting an honest source? Or does that not support the narrative?
Sounds like you don't ever submit feedback. It's been there from day one and asks you to write why you didn't like the response. It would not shock me if they use gpt itself to read the feedback and provide a corrected response for the next versions training data. They could also log anytime some provides negative sentiment in the chat session for training signal.