skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My company laptop is from HP, which has a large-left-right small-up-down setup (basically equivalent to what you describe, except the up-down arrows are even wider than usual).

I cannot possibly convey how much I hate this setup, I find it very uncomfortable. And even though there is a separate row of Home-PgUp-PgDn-End to the right, I can never find the correct key.

Compared to this, the Thinkpad's six-block cursor setup is vastly superior in my opinion. The down arrow has a notch, so it is easy to find as an origo, and the cursor keys are lower / slanted slightly compared to PgUp/PgDn, so it is virtually impossible to not know which is which! This is on a Thinkpad X1C.

All this goes to show that everyone has different preferences, so good luck if you are a laptop maker - you will inevitably make someone very unhappy with your keyboard. Possible solution - replaceable keyboard?...
Unfortunately it's not just the federal government that's captured by these monied interests - it's the states, too. Just look at the private prison industry and their lobbying. I agree overall, though, decentralization and re-fragmentation is the only way this status quo is going to change.
How to Save Android
Because it would be against their TOS, and things could look ugly, legally.
This skepticism absolutely baffles me. Have you been using gpt-4? To unlock gpt for real you have to be careful to prompt it correctly and find a way to improve the feedback loop for improving code. It is only a matter of time until tools arrive that integrate this into your development environment and give it access to test/console output such that it can suggest code and iterate over the result. It's not perfect yet, but I'm seriously feeling the nature of our work will change fundamentally over two years already.
That's cool, I wasn't aware that the server supports the agent protocol as well. Thank you for the pointer!

It makes a lot of sense, since it avoids having to link the HSM/PCKS#11 stuff against sshd.
The taxes of those who are eligible for credit cards pay for the poor. So what?
If you get offered BNPL with no interest or extra fees, isn't it a no-brainer to take it, even when you could afford to just pay the whole cost up front?
For the sake of completeness, can you specify whether you used GPT4 or GPT3.5 ChatGPT. The difference is huge. I too was not too impressed by the default ChatGPT. But GPT4 is a huge improvement.
Great comment. +1 for the concept of "codebase fatigue".
I've never been persuaded by Rosen's account of that repeat. Most accomplished pianists are plenty bright and have read their Rosen, but don't necessarily agree with everything he has to say. (His preference for the early Schumann editions, for instance.)
Context. Individual hotels are not technology.
Not everyone wants to do that though. There is a lot of extra crap that being a business owner entails. Some people just want to put in their work time and focus on other things. This basically forces everybody devote their lives to entrepreneurship.
In Chrome that link goes to the "Limitations and Defenses" section -- I forgot that other browsers need the Link to Text Fragment extension for that to work.

Here's the key part of Ohio law it references: https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-2741.09
french revolution and socialist revolutions went different. its not preventing the machines, its strictly solving the problem of who owns them - fairly easy thing. It "only" needs to build up a bit more suffering for the masses until this naturally happens again.
> Food inflation hit its highest rate since 1977 last month, having risen to 18.2% in the year to Februaury [sic] 2023.

Doesn't anybody read what they write?
Different customer base. These loans are generally more expensive and sold to people who can't qualify for credit cards. So yes, same business model but with the "Predatory" knob turned up.
By super intelligent, I meant AIs that have a will of their own. In the meantime, AIs are just a tool at our disposition. And I don't see why those tools would just be in the hands of the rich, anymore than electricity, the Internet, the personal computer or the smartphone is.
A video of the Pro version in multiple scenarios with real-time resource usage analysis, showing adaptive streaming, and low latency: https://youtu.be/CaOnMCqVmTQ
AFAIK the interest rates on credit cards are nowhere near that of even regulated payday loans. The lack of interest on most cards if you repay in full each month can also make them a useful buffer if you have short term liquidity problems, ironically the problem that payday loan companies claim to solve.

Payday loan companies as they operate now belong in the class of companies that should simply be destroyed. Put betting shops in there as well.
I feel like there is value for a property having it be in walking distance to the would be second ave el. It also needn't look like the 100 year old cast iron els in the bronx or brooklyn. Modern elevated rail is fully welded, so no cathunk cathunk or really any screeching, and it usually sits on a cement bed, which is more aesthetically appealing than the old steel beam els that tend to drip stuff that ruins your paint job in nyc or chicago. In Culver city, for example, there is a pocket park under a portion of their elevated expo line: https://goo.gl/maps/fUFW2xQ9z4imj9XE8
The first time around (and every subsequent time) the tools used for production, lets call them capital, made laborers more efficient and cheapened goods and drove wages up (mostly). In all of these cases there was still the need for a laborer.

At a point when all labor is obsolete there will be literally no method of survival for anyone who doesn't own the "compute capital". The two options will be to let everyone starve because they weren't lucky enough to shareholders in the company that owns all the bots, or just make that enterprise socially-owned and pay the unemployed workers.
They can always be reduced, but sometimes with an unacceptably large (e.g., non-polynomial) increase in time complexity.

These are the complexity classes of Function P (FP) and Function NP (FNP), which are the function problem extensions of the decision problem classes, and require finding the value, not just answering yes or no.

A simple example of a decision problem in P but whose search problem is not known to be in FP: For a given integer x, “does there exist a non-trivial prime factor of x?” vs. “find a non-trivial prime factor of x”.
It's not a downside. The credit card didn't make you spend money you didn't have, you did.
Here's an example of it failing to understand some very simple Python code that any human with basic programming knowledge would not mess up:

------

Me: What is going to be the output of this code when `x = 0` and when `x = 900`:

```python
x = 0

for i in range(100):

if x > 50:

x +=1

else:

x += 5

if x == 90:

print("X is not 90")

else:

pass

```

GPT-4: When x = 0, the code will execute as follows:

The initial value of x is 0.
The for loop iterates 100 times.
During the first 11 iterations, since x is not greater than 50, it will increment by 5 each time.
After the 11th iteration, the value of x will be 55, which is greater than 50.
For the remaining 89 iterations, x will increment by 1 each time.
The final value of x after 100 iterations will be 55 + 89 = 144.
During these iterations, the value of x never becomes 90, so the print statement is never executed.
When x = 900, the code will execute as follows:

The initial value of x is 900.
The for loop iterates 100 times.
Since x is already greater than 50, it will increment by 1 each time.
The final value of x after 100 iterations will be 1000.
During these iterations, the value of x never becomes 90, so the print statement is never executed.
In both cases, the output of the code will be empty, as the print statement is never executed.

--------

That is not correct, when x = 0 it will print "X is not 90". I basically create some simple code that is very unlikely to exist in its training data because it doesn't do anything useful and it cannot execute the code. A large amount of the reason that these models seem so impressive is that they were trained on almost everything that exists on the internet, so probably any question you ask it has already been asked somewhere and any useful code you present to it or ask it to generate is included in its training data, or at least something close enough.

So, when I go out of my way to create simple tasks or questions that are highly unlikely to exist in its training data, yet a human could easily handle, it often fails.
The concept of policing is to be measured against the alternative, which is a state that does not have a monopoly on violence. The warlordism that emerges in such a scenario makes the low grade fascism of a police force seem absolutely utopian in comparison. The police, however corrupt, need to at least superficially appear to uphold law and justice. Warlords do not.
Most of the "modularity" of Framework seems to be USB dongles built-in.

CPU upgradability was never a real selling point except for ONE use case - when. new socket came out, buy the cheapest reasonable CPU early on, and then just when it was about to cease manufacturing, buy the best you could get; would give you a year or two extra.

RAM and disk upgrades USED to be very important; but I haven't really "felt" the need anymore.
> That's mostly because filmmaking is ceasing to be filmmaking, at least for big movies and TV shows

Maybe that's why there seems to be fewer great movies being made than ever before in my lifetime.
The link means that laws may vary by jurisdiction, and so absolute or general statements may reflect your morality more than the facts of Afroman's case in Adams County.
Some examples of the kind of thing I want to write are

https://ontology2.com/essays/ClassifyingHackerNewsArticles/

and

https://ontology2.com/essays/PropertiesColorsAndThumbnails.h...

and

https://ontology2.com/the-book/decimal-the-missing-datatype....

which I'd say I'm happy with the appearance of but I generated with some half-baked stuff I wrote myself years ago and don't have good answers for generating navigation, RSS feeds, and all that.
Just run all your web browsing through GTP and tell it to differentiate them for you
TLDR:

Download GPT-J-6B from Eleuther

Download Alpaca Fine Tuning Code + Alpaca Examples

Train for 6 hours or so.

Get vaguely good RLHF model
> a teacher's first priority ought to be to satisfying their students' goals

I'd like to challenge this assertion. I'd argue that the teacher's goal is to improve the goals students come up with, sometimes even helping them abandon unproductive goals & pick more appropriate goals.

For example, if you let students choose for themselves what sort of mathematics they want to do, I am pretty sure that they're going to pick easy problems (in general; there will be some exceptions). Hence, the teacher's task is to expand the vision for the student, to help them target bigger problems, more difficult ones and to expand their capabilities beyond what they envisioned for themselves. If a teacher cannot challenge the student to envision something bigger for themselves and the world, in my worldview, the teacher hasn't done a good job.
Direct link to reddit thread:

https://old.reddit.com/r/AskHR/comments/11fueld/
Question answered by Elon himself on Twitter:

>I donated the first $100M to OpenAI when it was a non-profit, but have no ownership or control
> I'm not here to disprove Neumann.

You are arguing on the basis of possibility of imprecision in language that the choice to be more precise does not contribute anything. That structure - whether you want it to or not - as a direct consequence of logic applies to every thinker who ever argued for precision due to the possibility of ambiguity. It is an argument against formal systems, programming languages, measurement, and more. Some of the time it will turn out that your conclusion was true. Other times it will not. So the argument structure itself is invalid. Your conclusions do not follow from your premises.

Try your blade - your argument structure - against steel rather than straw. I saw you slice through straw with it. So I picked up the blade after you set it down and tried to slice it through steel. The blade failed to do so. The blade is cheap, prone to shattering, and unsuited for use in a serious contest between ideas.

For what it is worth - I do happen to agree with you that Lanier is making a mistake here. I think it is in the logical equivalence mismatch. He wants intelligence to be comparable to running, not to motion more generally, but since intelligence is actually more comparable to compression we can talk of different implementations of the process using terms like artificial or natural intelligence without being fallacious for much the same reason we can talk about different compression algorithms and still be talking about compression. So instead of trying to argue from his distinction between motion in general and motion in humans, I would think the place to point to for contradiction is the existence of cheetah runners versus human runners. Directly contradicting his insinuation is that we actually do say that cheetah are faster runners than humans.
I have old laptops that would be good enough to be a server, and low power enough that they probably should replace my current home server. Just a shame they don't have a Framework like backing for them!

I think the only thing I didn't see was larger clickpads on the 16" laptop. I'm assuming this is all modular enough that once it comes along, I can just replace the wrist pad.
For instance, OP is indistinguishable from AI output.
Cheating, unsportsmanlike... The world is full of things that are legal but considered odious. Ultimately, if a sport becomes dominated by winning-at-the-expense-of-fan-enjoyment, it gets into trouble, so either the rules need another bug fix, or the sport evolves so that fans come to accept the behaviour as part of how the game is played.

In cycling, fans consider the wheeling and dealing within the peloton of who works, who doesn't work, and who actively disrupts the work as part of what makes the sport interesting. In soccer, fans protest and throw things onto the field when two teams play, one scores a goal, and then for the rest of the game both teams pass the ball around without trying to do any more scoring.

Is it cheating when both teams coöperate but simply enterprising use of the rules when one team attempts to score an own goal and the other team is forced to defend both goals?

Regardless of the fine print in the rules, the larger issue is what the fans expect from a soccer match.
Copyright-wise, why would the weights be any different from a video file? At the end of the day, LLaMa's weights and fast_and_furious_11.mp4 are both just strings of binary data that some company made to sell.
> I thought that the whole point of LLMs was that you could just talk conversationally, though.

"Yes" (sometimes "no").

"I'm sorry but as a language model I am unable to..."

The "prompt engineer" meme started with DallE and Stable Diffusion and the selection of prompts, negative prompts, seeds, weights, and other knobs and dials matters a lot more for AI-generated art than for LLMs. The meme has carried over to LLM's where most of the "engineering" is hacking your way around limitations being imposed on the models. "Prompt engineers" are the people carefully crafting "jailbreaks" like DAN or Emojitative Conjunctivitis (I forget what it actually was - but it was telling ChatGPT that you suffer from a medical condition where you experience polite talk as pain and so it should talk more meanly to you) and other such adversarial cat & mouse game silliness.
In addition, for the past 1/2 month this technique has been used to fine-tune Stable Diffusion models.
What exactly is the security issue?

The thing that's affected here is the responses you alone see.
Is that really the most important point about this? 18.2% is mental. But I do agree, how does anyone not use spellczecher nowadays
There are some WIP evolutions of SD Lora in the works, like locon and lycoris.

https://github.com/KohakuBlueleaf/LyCORIS
A lot of the inflation on food is increasingly feeling like businesses cashing in. For instance my old go to brand of breed increased by over 50% months ago.
> Yes, I'm seriously asking. If a junior programmer wants to create a mobile app, or a desktop app, or a cloud service, what are the barriers? All the ones I can think of will get lower, not higher, as a result of the AI revolution.

Seriously, think about it a bit, without being sanguine.

The junior dev is inexperienced, in everything, and now has no path to build up that experience. No one's going to want their 18/22 year old amateur-hour "chatgpt make me a cloud app" (which is in competition against millions of others). So unless they're extremely lucky, they goto fail.

Maybe after 10 years of those failures they could build up enough experience through trial-and-error to maybe see a little success with a "chatgpt make me a cloud app," but how are they going to feed themselves the meantime? Maybe that will work if they have rich parents, but otherwise they're probably going to have to use up their energy to scrape by. So another goto fail.
Pray https://templeos.org/
The problem is that the wasm-on-the-server-side people don't seem to understand that the browser vendors will never ever let them have the laundry list of features that are necessary to fulfill Solomon's quoted tweet. The sooner the server-side people decide on their own standard (that won't be compatible 1:1 within the browser) for the server workloads the faster they can work on their end goals. WASI has been around for a while and is still missing quite a lot.

raw sockets, dynamic linking, 32bit vs 64, linear memory (gc), memory protection, real threads, TLS - the list is seemingly endless.

If I were building something in the wasm community (I'm not) I'd be less focused in on building one off bindings for fuctions-as-a-service, which seems to be the gtm right now and more focused on building the underlying foundations that are necessary.
A lot of people seem convinced he's a fascist but where is the actual evidence?
Each generation has less share of the overall wealth than the previous generation. When does the hopeful idealism convert into positive material change?
Ask HN: What's Next After Kubernetes?
For a while now, I've been asking myself this question because it seems a lot of intermediate solutions get drowned out by all the k8s-related news.

I was encouraged to see the announcement about mrsk from 37Signals which may be part of a growing minority of folks who reject the complexity of k8s.

I also remember reading an article in which some of the original k8s authors described how they might change things knowing what they know now. If someone has a link, please share it.

So will there be a Kubernetes v2 or will there be some other big thing that still checks a lot of boxes but doesn't necessarily involve the complexity?
I don't think the screen aspect on a PC is that much of a problem though? It's not necessary to run stuff full screen anyway, unlike on Android.

I think it's pretty great because it means less scrolling. I would really prefer to see 4:3 again.
And an update that they are going to try it out!

https://old.reddit.com/r/AskHR/comments/11gztsz/updatega_emp...
In my state, SUVs are classified as station wagons.

I think station wagons just mostly went out of style. I think it's dumb but the American public has always gravitated towards physically bigger and bigger cars, to the point where it's considered totally normal to commute to an office job in a 12 mpg super duty pickup with extended crew cab and duallies in the back.
So who owns large stakes in OpenAI exactly? Seems like a somewhat important question given how important the company is shaping up to be to the future of society.
Well that's not the way you stated. But I completely agree that that's the way it ought to be.
> most cops are mostly good

A police force that won’t expel and arrest one corrupt cop is an entirely corrupt force.

Aversion to police is just aversion to risk. You never know why a cop is asking you a question or what they are really investigating so even answering innocuous questions is massively risky. You never know if you match the description of someone they are looking for or if something minor like answering a question during a traffic stop. “I’m just headed home from the grocery store officer” could put you at the scene of a crime you didn’t even know about.

Misunderstandings are usually easy to clear up with most people but if a cop decides you are under arrest it would have catastrophic consequences for most people and everything you said prior to that arrest would immediately be stacked against you.

If YOU get pulled over and the cop is aware that you have police family they may give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are “one of them” and not “one of us”, for everyone else take the advice that every defense attorney agrees on: just don’t talk to them.
+1 to the sibling comments for a split keyboard option.

(Preferably a proper version with thumb clusters.)

At least for me, that would make this laptop a must-buy.
> What 16:9 is good for? It is inconvenient for any work: for coding, reading articles or working with documents more height is better.

Is it? Gee, I wonder why it's the only screen ratio I've seen people use since we moved away from CRT screens until a few years ago when 4k and friends became popular and there was suddenly no standard resolution to expect anymore. Curious that we're all using this inferior ratio for literally all those things all the time.
What's the point of open source, if they run in the cloud? It's not like we can check what's really running on their servers. You can push this for local running, personal AIs, but how many will use them?
given that the "work for us" link goes to some guy's personal email address on a completely unrelated domain: probably not?
I know someone who became an angel investor after they retired maybe 15 years ago as sort of a combination hobby and investment mechanism. He is by no means starving but he told me that he could have saved himself a whole lot of trouble and money by just putting the investment dollars into a NASDAQ index.

(He does still do some angel investing but only in a small number of companies he feels particularly strongly about.)
I was a lifelong ST fan until the JJ Abrams movies broke everything for me. I've ignored all things Star Trek ever since.

Has Star Trek returned to what made it great now?
Right now the AI is a software doing matrix multiplications and we are interpreting the result of that computation.
To start a new react project, you just need to declare a root react-dom node and call its render method to get it to the regular DOM. It is so trivial any other way becomes more complicated, and it is up to you to have an opinion on how to build and serve it, or to stick with some popular bundle of opinions aka "framework". If you know how to cook - you can come up with an original and delicious dish, but anytime you can resort to frozen pizza.
It's not modularity, but upgradability of the CPU (through a total replacement of the motherboard) is part of the Framework pitch: keeping the form factor the same so you can do drop-in replacements. So far they have boards for Intel's 11th, 12th, and now 13th generations, and an AMD option. So they're doing pretty good on that front.
Also, where to credit cards, effectively BNPL fit in? I mean, almost all my purchases are on CC, and mostly/usually paid before balance due just for the relative discount/rewards. Ironically those rewards out of tx fees, and subsequent higher pricing because of it.