skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There's quite a bit of activity getting the rk3588 working in the mainline kernel. People having current mainline kernel+patches working today, and getting those patches mainstreamed has been making steady progress.

Some places to watch the activity if interested:

https://gitlab.collabora.com/hardware-enablement/rockchip-3588
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/list/

My nano Pi R6S (another SBC with RK3588) has dual 2.5GBE and 1GBE, is pretty fast, and has 8GB ram. I expect it to be useful for many years to come.
Ok this is like the 3rd “article” that’s just repeating a report from Zoe Schiffer, and offering literally no other information nor any other sources.

I only clicked this link because I thought BI might actually have done some work. The cynic in me says that they delayed publishing this copied article solely to ensure they get shared on sites without being marked as duplicates.
Amen to all of that
Except that as usual its not on mainline so it becomes disposable junk once someone decides to drop support for it
OMG, so much bad advice in this thread.

The best advice here is the comment telling you not to listen to us. You're not going to get good advice from strangers that know nothing about you.
It's good, but verbose, you can't select nested objects by just doing lesson.mapped.sections.course .. etc.. you have have to do something like

lesson: {
select: {
id: true,
slug: true,
title: true,
mapped_sections: {
select: {
id: true,
slug: true,
section: {
select: {
id: true,
title: true,
course: {
select: {
id: true,
slug: true,
title: true
This is just funny as well as clever!
I like your use of time-scales to try to explain why we are where we are. I hope very much you're right that what we see now is isn't really reflective. That a ton of really big improvements to RISC-V cores are being lined up, will show up.

I'm not going to judge too quickly. But man, waiting till 2026 feels hard. Whether we have any intermittent experience of RISC-V closing the gap in that time is still in doubt to me. And I keep worrying that we'll forever see a huge split: a bunch of super cheap super low-end RISC-V application-processors that are just not good, and a bunch of many-thousand-dollar fancy units, that may or may not get actually good benchmarks/availability. With ARM potentially getting absurd & stupid, the good value for a sub $100 or sub $300 SBC seems like the real competition, and I just have such concern RISC-V is going to bifuracte between extremely up-market & extremely cheap crap.
Today, I am only looking forward, with RISC-V architecture. ARM SBCs are the past.

I love my VisionFive 2. It is no Orange Pi 5, but it is fast enough, and it is RISC-V proper.
I’m an American. I lived in Switzerland. There is no glorification of the military. It’s a job that people have to do. It’s less, “I proudly serve my country,” and much more, “Aw crap. It’s time for my annual marksmanship certification.”
Whenever the "what actually backs the US dollar" discussion comes up I remind them: 11 aircraft carriers.
Establishing an equivalent law for firmware would be interesting too.
especially rich coming from phoronix which is a Linux focused publication. they should know better.
This is exactly what autodoc does in your terminal. It wouldn't be hard to package it as a VSCode plugin.
This is some sort of modern news urban legend. They definitely did lots and lots of hiring. The recruiters I met were all constantly busy.
Fuck me I feel old.
I love that feeling that I get writing for closure, when I'm distilling and crystallizing things that I've learned about a topic. I use physical notebooks for that kind of writing, and writing the words out by hand once I've understood something just feels so nice and durable. And then I can page it out of my brain, knowing the notes are there if I need them again.

(By contrast, I'll usually have a temporary digital file with notes in flux while I'm learning something. But the notebooks are where I write things "on-the-record.")
It's a space mission analogue environment, with an expectation of minimal real estate, you're looking at a self contained "living module" as opposed to a science module.
>They are not that important

Snowden: "Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say."
I wonder if he tried the trick that Microsoft recommended in their GPT4 evaluation paper, that is ask gpt to go step by step with explanations. It tends to produce much better results, simply because it is more fitting to the prediction mechanism that GPT uses . It tends to predict better when steps are smaller.
Do you have any evidence that supports that being the case in practice? Can you have evidence of it? Whenever we get a peek behind the curtain it generally seems like warrants are not a factor.

That belief has to ultimately be a statement of faith. It is basically counting on highly untrustworthy people behaving honestly - they probably aren't. And all the elements of the system are hidden where there is no accountability.
US teens say they have new proof for 2k-year-old mathematical theorem
Generally these documents wouldn't be used directly. You can use the `doc q` command to query these documents with natural language questions.
Who needs philosopher kings when warlords will suffice?
Sorry, those were two different thoughts. I only have numbers for 2019. I haven't been able to find anything for pandemic years other than general reports that ebook borrowing spiked.
Hard to say. They could also be lying to further their (in)famy (maybe they never want another professional job), cast sour grapes where they used to work, or were paid to by some reporter who wants to keep the motor running on the story inflation machine. I think some of these stories are just fakes.
What is the difference to training an adapter? Or to adding a new task specific layer [0]? Has it been demonstrated that LoRA works best out of all of these approaches?

[0] https://towardsdatascience.com/adding-custom-layers-on-top-o...
Have ISPs intercept unencrypted DNS requests as well as drop TLS connections where ClientHello.ServerName ~* '*.tiktok.com'.
I think it’s for people who have been coding in user land for a long time, but never actually dug into how glib’s heap memory management works.

It’s a pretty dry topic, important though it is, and I appreciate sploitfun taking the time to give me a tour through it.
What about that do you think needs updating?

What's being prohibited there is using Stripe as a virtual substitute for a credit card terminal, e.g. a merchant processing credit cards in person or over the phone by typing them into a web page with a Stripe form.
The state for old school text markov chains are N words or similar, so you use the past N words to generate a new word, append it to the last N-1 words and now you got your next state. That is exactly what these language models does, you feed them a limited number of words as a state, and the next state is that word appended to the last and cut words in excess of the models limit.

The attention layer just looks at that bounded state. GPT-3 for example looks at a few thousand tokens, those are its state, it is bounded so it doesn't look at all previous tokens.
More like withoutgoogle.com
It doesn't even need to be quoted. There's an interest to gather attention by any and all means. That's sad. Either way, it's gossip masquerading as "news"... double-quoting since it's not newsworthy.
Just reading through, the distinction seems pretty obvious to me. It doesn’t reinforce several of my ideological perspectives, even contradicts some, but the distinction is plain as day. Physical things are subject to the laws of physics (can’t be in two places at once), idea “things” are much more ephemeral and thus much less restricted by those same rules (an idea can propagate basically infinitely and be “had” by basically all who wish to have it, barring arbitrary rules to the contrary). The former has concrete, immutable scarcity, and the latter only has scarcity people assign to it.
Reviving Chromebooks is a lot easier than that. Just install ChromeOS flex.
I check under my bed for threat actors before going to sleep every night.

That said, in all seriousness you're right: the notion of handing over one's phone is insane to me.
It's not wrong, we have a wall street government. Did you notice at how those most responsible for the 2008 financial crisis, never went to jail... instead they were the advisory board for Obama on financial stuff?
Pretty sure those 3 examples will be completed by robots this year if they haven’t already.
It's been a real mixed bag for me. The other day I tried to get it (GPT-4) to generate shader code to create a ray with a pannini projection, and it failed over and over and over again. No amount of reprompting or nudging got it anywhere close to fixing the problem.

On the other hand, it can explain certain complicated concepts extremely easily. I like asking it questions when I just want a general answer as opposed to something that must work.
I not so secretly wonder what a 2027 looks like when SBC all have to have USB4, when USB4 hub chips (actually, routers) are semi-commodity parts and not uber-botique Intel crazy-pants expensive units, and when Thunderbolt/PCIe is a logical royalty-free step away.

We're only just seeing Thunderbolt show up in mobile, via the IPad Pro. The percolation down of the universal, good, flexible, kick-ass connectivity standards is semi-inevitable. Right now it's a ton of add-on extra chips, but that will go away, will get integrated. These discrepancies of PC chips having some things and mobile parts having totally different specs feels like it can't last forever, at least in every category. There will be some uptake of common capabilities.
Critical vulnerability in WooCommerce Payments Plugin allows full-site takeover
The other advantage is the total net worth as opposed to GDP. You hear a lot about GDP and the US has the biggest economy by far.

But the total net worth per person in the States is even further ahead of the rest of the world. Only Switzerland is ahead of the US in per-capita net worth (only by a hair though) and one suspects that’s partly due to so many Americans parking their money there.

Having had the biggest GDP for decades led to a amazing amount of wealth being concentrated in the USA.
> wiki or markdown files in source

Exactly.
Then don't. Stop drilling, stop buying foreign petrochemical products, and transition to renewables rapidly. Reliance on FFs is killing us.
“Reflection-Based GPT-4 Agent is State-of-the-Art on Code Gen

Iteratively refines code, shifting “accuracy bottleneck” from correct code gen to correct test gen

HumanEval accuracy:

-Reflexion-based GPT-4 88%

-GPT-4 67.0%

-CodeT 65.8%

-PaLM 26.2%”

with link to code in the Tweet:

https://mobile.twitter.com/johnjnay/status/16393620718075494...

21% improvement after adding a feedback loop and self-reflection to GPT-4, which just went public 12 days ago. (The approach is based on a preprint published 4 days ago.)

Human coders often need a feedback loop and self-reflection to properly “generate” code for problems novel to them as well.

-----

A larger question: Are we hurling ourselves toward a (near) future of unaligned AGI with self-improvement capabilities?
Unlike the Huawei and ZTE sanctions, I believe they do not have strong evidence or reasoning for Bytedance, which is why all that politicians can do is being angry at Tiktok for their addictive algorithm and their China-based ownership, and realistically only the latter because "addictive algorithms" are everywhere, including FB.
This article is garbage. Look at it carefully. Where is the reasoning? Where is the evidence? It's just one magical claim after magical claim.

Compilers didn't replace coders, they just changed the nature of coding. AI doesn't change coding, but it may change the nature of coding in some ways.

A CEO of a company could theoretically manage directly every single person in his workforce. But he doesn't. Why? Because managing people requires that you understand what they do and how they might be doing it wrong. You need to track their status. Otherwise, things get completely out of control and your plans go nowhere.

Now imagine a perfect AI "coder." How do you manage it? You will have to know how to talk to it and how to understand its behavior. But this is exactly how human coders deal with compilers and libraries today. We will not see ANY replacement of engineers with AI. What we will see is a new category of high-level programming via prompt engineering.

Programmer tools have not, up until now, ever led to a contraction of the software industry. There are more programmers out there than ever before. Advances in technology merely expand what can be done with tech.

Imagine one more thing. Let's say you find a genie lamp and the genie inside gives you three wishes. You COULD makes those wishes yourself. But there are often unhappy side effects. What you need is to go find a Genie Whisperer-- essentially a coder who understands genies; how they think; what they can do; what the pitfalls of dealing with them are. The Genie Whisperer will translate your naive desires into carefully couched language that maximizes the probability of getting what you want.

You see? EVEN IF AI IS LITERALLY MAGIC business people will discover that they should not deal directly with it.
MIT is no longer associated with this Russian research organization:

https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-vladimir-putin-sci...
I can corroborate that text-davinci gives much better results than for tasks involving summarization or extraction of key sentences among a large corpus. I wonder what empirical metrics OpenAI uses to determine performance benchmarks for practical tasks like these. You can see the model in action for analysis of reviews here: https://show.nnext.ai/

[Disclaimer - I work at nnext.ai]
The culprits of this travesty must be named and shamed:

Suing publishers: Hachette, HarperCollins, Penguin Random House, and Wiley.

Judge: John G. Koeltl.

Don't care about the judge, but there should be a massive campaign to boycott these four publishers to oblivion. What's the most harmful thing that we can do to them?
That’s probably what OpenAI does with their custom fine tuned models, no?
It seems like one can just email the internet archive to have their content excluded. Was there a reason why they refused in these cases?
The Dollar Store Invasion – Institute for Local Self-Reliance
> I have ticket only repos where people can create tickets.

Nice thinking.

> We create issues from a user form too!

This is where the money's at. I'm assuming this was done via Github API + Generated Token. I was thinking of something similar to this, however using a Slackbot.
I use it to optimize my Python + Pandas code. Dump some code in and say “Can you rewrite this code to be faster”. It even gives explanations as to why it’s making those changes.

Another one I use it for is saying “Rewrite this code to run on multiple cores”. Really saves me a lot of Googling time as these are things I want, but I don’t find much pleasure in actually writing code.

I’ve also used it to generate some proof ideas while I’m going through exercises in Baby Rudin. Or to check a proof I’ve come up with if it makes sense.
So theoretically in your world I can work at a company, copy their code, data set up my own site, then trip on their power cord taking their site down on my last day, oops sorry.
It's actually too slow at the moment. I find myself asking it something and then opening another tab and doing a conventional search. Often, I'll get the answer faster via conventional search.

At this point I'd prioritize speed over new capability.
That isn’t true - the US has 39% of all millionaires, and China has 10%. [0]

Clearly a lead that can be overcome, but now with China’s turn back to proper communism, they will probably never get there.

[0] Page 27: https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/ab...
But I can borrow ebooks from other public libraries.

Is there something specific about IA or is this ruling making the concept of epub borrowing a copyright infringement (in the US)?
It's funny how age of an event is used to justify that something should be stopped. So sunset Google Search too? It seems to be a Google thing to do: randomly start and discontinue things without much thought.
Writing Emails, mostly.
https://tco23.topcoder.com
It's probably more accurate to call him a "fellow traveler". That is, he isn't someone who espouses the ideology of fascism outright.

But he's definitely willing to walk down same road with those who are much more clearly and visibly on the fascistoid spectrum (such as the candidate he supported for president in 2016 and 2020) in order to advance his own goals. All while being smart enough to understand the sociopolitical landscape, the parallels to history and all that.
maybe a "code formatter" that just asks an LLM if it can rewrite this code, but pretty?
I'm in neither Search nor Ads, but have been at Google long enough to have seen the massive change in internal culture between 2015 and the present day. I don't want to speculate on any specifics, but it's pretty clear to me that we shouldn't be applying 2015-era logic or perceptions to today's Google and expecting them to hold.
Parler and Kiwifarms weren't outlawed by the US government.
> (about to become obsolete by ChatGPT's intervention)

I don't think so.
Writing a full length essay still need lots of guardiace and proof reading.

People will pay someone to use ChatGPT for them.
they don't mention why it's ending?
The most obvious distinction between intellectual property and ordinary property is their history. Ownership of things has existed for longer than reliable records are available. Copyright and patents, by contrast, were created during the late Renaissance in response to the particular economic circumstances of the time. They have since become the tools of entrenched interests who would rather suggest that things have always been this way and we couldn't live without it.

Is anything humans do natural? The only thing that can make something unnatural, so far as we understand it, is human intervention. Insofar as we conceive of unnaturalness as a recognizable quality of phenomena, it is more acute when the humans responsible are more sophisticated in their methods. We can easily observe a very large difference between the primitiveness of human society when it created the ownership of things and the much more advanced culture that devised what we now call intellectual property. From this construction of what is natural and what is not, we clearly find that intellectual property is much less "natural", though there is still the necessity of accepting that "natural" can be a meaningful idea at all.
I don't think "randomly increasing prices" counts as a dark pattern. It's just a plain and simple economic pattern.

The only reason some companies are able to get away with this is because too many people shop mindlessly without checking prices.

The solution is for everyone to pay attention to prices when we shop: the brands who jump their prices up will have 0 customers.

I'm not saying it's easy, and perhaps grocery store price labelling isn't maximally effective, but when we shop frugally, we actually benefit not only ourselves, but each other.
Nature doesn't have F35 fighter jets, fully autonomous drones that can duty cycle 24/7 for months, hackernews discussion boards built on the internet, that benefited from thousands of years of physics breakthroughs. Nukes, medicine, ect, you know the list of technologies..

Even in a war-economy, the majority of the civilian populace has to provide all the complicated logistics, food, services, entertainment, ect to keep the war effort going. Being a wage slave to a warlord isn't a magic fix to "egalitarianism".

We can already live outside of egalitarianism. I can guarentee you Bill Gates, Stephen Hawkings and Jeff Bezos (and the lowest of society too) have no need for my input on their life, and don't know I exist.
Make no mistake, the law is specific made to limit free access to information. Originally this was a reasonable concession to encourage creative work, but as the length extended and copyright starts to be controlled by massive corporations, they gradually became a way to protect profits.
Low-Level C Programming – CSE 325 Lecture Videos
Planned obsolescence is annoying when it comes to light bulbs. But for general purpose computers and TV sets, planned obsolescence should be illegal. When buying a general purpose computer mac, pc or chromebook, the manufacturers should be imposed to make sure the computer can run an open source operating system too.

Apple have not paid anything as far as I know to the community that are working on drivers to make Linux run on their M1 and M2 Apple Silicon Macs. Most of the software the powers the Chromebooks is open source.
We must keep going forward in time until a backwards time machine is invented.
> utilities prioritize the welfare of the citizens who reside in an vote

Not according to the rate increases in my bills. More like padding their pensions and political apparatus.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.11916.pdf
> In a few years, they will catch up with the Samsung/TSMC and hopefully, and we will start seeing price reductions.

I think this is quite unlikely, even other giant semiconductor companies that aren't sanction have trouble keeping up with TSMC.
If we want the workers to completely own the means of production, by all means put officials elected by the workers wholly in charge of fiscal and monetary policy. I'm not arguing against it. Just don't half-ass it, let's go all in on central planning.
I had a script with a huge chunk of spaghetti awk and sed I wrote years ago and couldn’t remember how it worked. I pasted it into ChatGPT and asked it to explain it to me and then make some small edits that changed the output. It did a remarkably good job.
If artists deserve money every time you read a book then your plumber should get paid every time you take a shit. Copyrights have been abused to the point of absurdity. They should last no longer than patents.

A writer/artist/whatever can make some money off a work for two decades and then their work goes to the society that enabled its creation.
> the FISA court granted 33,942 warrants, with only 12 denials – a rejection rate of 0.03 percent of the total requests.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Foreign_Intellig...
The backlog might shrink quickly when the LLM is testing and debugging the software 24/7 for the cost of a few dollars per hour.
The very first time I ever was paid to write software, in 1982, I asked my client to tell me what he wanted. Then I gave that to him, and he complained he didn't like it. He really wanted something else. He was bad at saying what he wanted, and he was bad at knowing what he wanted. There is an old saying (I think from Jerry Weinberg): Make it possible for people to write programs in plain English, and you will find they are not able to write plain English.

The reason you need an intermediary is because you don't have the patience or training to completely specify your system. And if you don't completely specify it, then you are just going to get what everyone else gets. (If you DO have the pateince and training, then congratulations you are an engineer.)

If you are content with getting something generic, then you don't even need to write software in the first place, just download Word!
It's super useful for working with terrible APIs such as Shopify. Since it's trained on programs where people have figured it out from trial and error, it saves me a lot of time.