skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
IIUC, and am certainly not an expert, some of these can apply in practice for those with lower retirement incomes. That's not to say it's not a struggle at these levels, of course; the challenge might be cost of living vs dollars in the account, rather than taxes.

So (3) would definitely help that group (as sibling mentions, it's also inflationary). Bernie Sanders and others have proposed raising benefits for current retirees recently, even while Social Security needs to be shored up. With the Republican House it can be argued this is mostly political theater (disclaimer: I vote for Democrats and am usually a Bernie fan.) tl;dr like you mention this probably won't happen.

(2) Social Security is 50% taxable between $30-45k and 85% taxable above $45k. IIUC, couples over 65 get a slightly raised standard deduction of $29,200, so if they only have social security they're paying 0 and half-tax up to $74,200, which if my math is right will be an effective tax rate of around 3-4%.

Some states may tax retirement benefits; due to the above these can be higher than the Federal taxes.

(1) There's Roth for this, though I recognize not everyone has the means or planning. But I mention this in the context of +1'ing Trad 401(k) taxes not going away... Roth lets the government pull future revenue into the present to be spent now. Also, Dems would probably bring up a fairness angle as to which groups contributed to 401(k)s and how this would be more regressive than an across-the-board cut.

But regardless of whether it's 401(k) or other income, the Federal tax rates can be quite progressive. The 2023 12% bracket for couples goes all the way up to $89,500, so adding the standard deduction a couple can make $118,000 and still be in the 12% bracket (effective federal tax will be around 8-9%). Though the more that they make under this point, the more it pushes their social security into taxable ranges...

If the couple has long-term gains from a taxable investment account, there is a 0% LTCG bracket up to $89k as well, meaning so long as they have no other income, a couple can realize six figures of gains every year and pay no federal tax on them.
This is not relevant to the comment you are replying to.
And the title is: "OpenAI tech gives Microsoft's Bing a boost in search battle with Google".
Doesn't this argument also apply all the way down to machine code, though?
There is a web interface to TikTok. For consuming TikTok it is not quite as fast and fluid as the app, but that's good enough to satisfy the non-creators using it as an entertainment medium.
Part of the reason is UK ran out of tomatoes, peppers etc. EU didn't have the same issues.

Source: live in UK
True, but arguably this article constrains itself to the kernel-user boundary, where atomic instructions could be considered out of scope considering how the Linux syscall ABI is constructed.
I built my first plugin to allow ChatGPT to run SQL queries against Datasette and use the response to answer questions.

I wrote up my experiences building it here: https://simonwillison.net/2023/Mar/24/datasette-chatgpt-plug...
Watching a concert on Youtube or seeing a baseball game on TV are completely different than seeing them in person.
The truth is that the assertion that elementary schools are trying to expose children to pornography is outright untrue, because of course it is. Conservatives have simply decided to equate that with allowing children to freely see same-sex relationships portrayed in the same way as opposite-sex relationships have been portrayed to them forever. It's a lie that only serves to divide people and try to convince them of the outdated notion that non-straight people are child abusers, and therefore that the republican party is the anti-child abuser party.

In the end, the only hope the republican party has to survive as the older generation passes is to rely on lies of this nature to divide enough people that vote based on moral outrage instead of fact.
If I understand the sandboxing capabilities correctly, it seems like it could be a neat way to run untrusted code from users.
Abrahamic religions:

> This is my covenant with you and your descendants after you, the covenant you are to keep: Every male among you shall be circumcised.

https://biblehub.com/genesis/17-10.htm

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religions
> It'll be interesting to see what happens when AI truly surpasses human level intelligence, as in, being able to completely replace human jobs, but we're not there yet.

But we are there. This is a reality we live in for a lot of people. That's why the existential crisis in the OP.
As of today Google still has not fixed the vulnerability on Pixel 6 a device that Google promised it would provide security fixes for 5 years disclosed by the Project Zero which is a Google suborg.
> It's not censoring books; rather a state choosing which books to publicly fund in school libraries. No one is banning parents from buying those books on their own dime.

It's censorship and an infringement on the basic constitutional rights of public employees to independently make purchasing decisions for the government.
The government can also buy things (like infrastructure) and employ people to provide public services, which directly injects money into the economy by paying it to the people who do that work.

The current UK government has not been doing much of this.
Just like how waiting for 10 minutes in Starbucks during my morning commute ... made me feel like a persecuted Jewish prisoner awaiting execution!

/s

Your original point was ridiculous, tone deaf, offensive and completely without substance other than to wave the victim flag about _something_ I guess? Who knows.
It’s not been 4%, it’s been below that. Mostly less than half that actually. And I was wrong, it’s been that way for over 30 years, not 20.
So all Sensiron sensors are tuned for minimum 400ppm, other than this one:

https://sensirion.com/products/catalog/STC31

The problem is that it gives you percentage of CO2 in air instead of ppm, it can go all the way down to 0% though. I guess there must be a way to figure out the ppm based on that? I guess?

Here's an example of a product with this sensor already integrated:

https://www.sparkfun.com/products/18385

Also I want to point out that their other sensors(SCD40 and SCD41) will actually give you a value even below 400ppm - just that their accuracy drops below that value. So it might say it's 300ppm when in reality it's 250ppm. Not sure how important it is for you.
The interesting thing about food is that most people in the country probably spend 10x on food than what they really need to (including eating/drinking out). We pay for convenience and luxury, but if push comes to shove there’s a lot of economising to be had.
> This technique is being used to reproduce[0] the Alpaca results from Stanford[1]

Reproduced is a strong statement, without any rigorous justification other than a few cherry-picked examples. Alpaca-LoRA is simply LLaMA with LoRA-tuning on the Alpaca data. There are no metrics, no measurements, no evaluations to show that the Alpaca-LoRA performs similarly to Alpaca, when it is well-known in the field that parameter-efficient fine-tuning always pays a cost in terms of performance relative to full fine-tuning (which is what Alpaca does).

(This has been a huge nit for me because of the recent flood of Alpaca-replications, or even claims that Alpaca comparable to ChatGPT, rushing to market themselves, but with nothing to justify their claims.)
Are you using GPT 3.5 or GPT-4? It's a huge difference.
I figured someone would reply with this. Yes, and it is already an issue. However the issue isn’t as bad for a variety of reasons, notably better abstractions.

I would argue natural language can never be as precise as code without being effectively a new programming language. The effectiveness as desired is specifically due to the imprecision necessary.
Arm wants to charge dramatically more for chip licenses
You can read the actual law. Your description is incorrect.
No.. it's not all hands on deck event... I was planning on doing these maybe one component/module per team per week, I have made guidelines and some general good practices that would reward points.
This would be more of a passive activity for the members, my team and I are new to software development as well so I was hoping this would be good for learning as well
Free shipping at $35 on Amazon Fresh always felt too good to be true in manhattan – it was way cheaper to get your groceries shipped in from their warehouses than to shop in the city itself
I see in another comment you said you cured your schizo-affective Bipolar disorder without medication. Do you mind if I ask how you did that? I have a condition (probable personality disorder with extreme anxiety) and I've been taking methadone to get off of opioids for about 4 years now, and I noticed that when I go down on my dose, my symptoms start to flare up. So in essence I'm keeping it in check with the same class of drugs I was using to self-medicate with. I have done DMT and it did do wonders for me (went from daily suicidal ideation to almost no suicidal thoughts in almost a decade) but I think there has to be more.
It was down for quite a while, so I would call it an outage.
>By giving money to people without producing more stuff - or even making it harder to produce the same - you MUST have inflation, rationing, or empty shelves - and often all three.

Completely inaccurate. Giving people money that came from taxes does not increase the money supply.

Giving people money that came from selling bonds does not increase the money supply.

Only printing money increases the money supply.
That's cool in the short term, but it will be news when it's sustained. I logged in to Bing for the first time in forever to play with the AI some, but it didn't change my default search behavior of using Google, and now it's been easily two weeks since I went to Bing at all.
Someone will reply to this with a list of news articles purporting to contradict you, and all of those articles will be about controversies surrounding books available in high school or public libraries.
It’s fun to use statistics to create your narrative.
Both LoRA and prompt tuning are parameter-efficient tuning methods. Both of them inject new weights into the model and tune them.

Prompt tuning does so by injecting addition prefix tokens in the input to the model. LoRA does so by injecting low-rank matrices that are additive modifications to a set of linear layers in the model.

They both do something slightly different, but are very much in the same class of methods.
gRPC requires HTTP/2, which is a nontrivial added requirement. Prevents it from running on Heroku and ironically Google AppEngine, and wherever it does work, load balancers will probably need special setup for it. Even Kubernetes. You can translate it to/from JSON, but that defeats the purpose.
government can directly invest in production capacity to produce stuff.

Like they can build housing and windfarms, etc.
Hey ChatGPT, your code is throwing excetpion XXX/causing unintended behaviour YYY, please adjust your code.

I agree with your sentiment though, people are going to cut themselves on a lot of sharp edges, but lazy devs or people after unsustainable velocity will run unvetted code anyway.
They're not bribing US politicians, which is why there is now unprecedented "bipartisan" support for banning TikTok, because we need to protect the children or not.
I think we're all reading the wrong message from that quote. It's supposed to look like the guy's humble but that's just the miser entrepreneur mindset. Spend as little money on luxuries, spend as much as possible on making more money. The CEO at the company I work at is the same way, drives absolute banger cars in an effort to save money or something. I think he ends up paying more in repairs than if he just bought a new one.
As far as I know the copyright situation for models is ambiguous and also depends on the region. In the US you can't copyright data made by an automated process but you can in the EU, or something to that effect.
I had to scroll down to far. Cheap nuclear energy now!
The actual book gives credit for the cover art to Midjourney-v5.
It has fixed the issue. I got the March update with the fix a few days ago.
The Olympics and other international orgs like FIFA are a huge mistake and should be done away with completely. They are corrupt organizations that exist to perpetuate themselves and serve the interests of the corrupt government officials they specialize in dealing with.

For instance, Russia used the 2014 Olympics in Sochi as a pretext for buying tons of western special forces gear ostensibly to provide security for the games. That gear, vastly superior to old Soviet equipment, is now being used by Russia against Ukraine.

And now here we see the Olympics being used to normalize mass surveillance. Enough is enough.
Christ. I'm glad you and the pup made it through that scary situation.

Due to the potential for an extreme outcome, I've long though Swatting should cop the 'prankster' an attempted murder charge. Which is in itself probably excessive, but hey.
Why does a clock app new to contain ads?
Eh, one of the primary value props of good youtube channels is the authenticity. I think this will be a tougher nut to crack for AI than most.
Maybe you're bad at choosing
Does Flatpak solve this issue to some point, at least when using fully sandboxed apps?
There's a lot of arguments about the mechanisms of inflation, and its various symptoms, but surely the root cause of inflation is elevated energy prices?

I mean energy underpins the price of everything else in an economy, especially production and transportation, which in turn affects the price of groceries. I guess as far as groceries go there's also a significant labor component, but still, it must surely be the cost of energy as the principal driver of inflation?

Edit: typos
The US is already influencing US mass psychology, but I guess people are more ok with being manipulated by people who were born in the same border as them, than by people who were born outside that border.
I don't think it's arrogance, it's just that blaze inside google is really nice, and they assume that using the tool outside google will also be really nice.

The issue is that to make it really nice:

- you have to convert everything to it, not just almost everything

- you need to set up build servers and lightning fast caching servers

- you need a team dedicated to building bazel rules for whatever doesn't already have rules (see: you must convert everything). This team is a bottleneck

Regular google engineers aren't exposed to these issues, because inside google it just works. It's only once they try to deploy it themselves that they realize it's a sisyphean task.

The thing is, bazel actually is really good at solving the issues it was designed for, it's just most companies do not have those particular problems acutely enough that it's worth paying the cost to switch to bazel.
> under the assumption that it is fair use.

No, because you as a human looking at "art" over your lifetime and learning from it is not "fair use" of the copyright, it's no-use at all. This is the crux of every argument for both for language models and AI Art models, that their tools are learning how to draw, learning what styles and characteristics of input art correspond the most with words, and creating art with that knowledge just like any other human, not simply collaging together different pieces of art.
I wouldn't underestimate the power of momentum
The problem is that many when saying "EU" are thinking mainly Germany and other countries among the top-3/5. But even Germany is behind the US in terms of GDP/capita, PPP probably also.
> This requires developers to build hundreds (thousands?) of versions of their app

No. You build one version; this is the premise behind the VM environment that runs your code, which is "write once, run everywhere". If you depend on system APIs only provided by Google or Amazon, you have an additional version for each system that exclusively provides those APIs.

> consumers face a bewildering array of user interfaces.

Not in the apps themselves. Conflating the system UI with the app UI?

> They have made no real effort to fix the root problems – especially around fragmentation, security and privacy.

I'll push back on this without expending too much effort: Treble, Mainline, and the new Privacy Sandbox are actual efforts that have improved things on the security/privacy front. AndroidX makes fragmentation a non-issue beyond the most esoteric of app requirements.

> Google should make Android truly open source.

I mean, I am able to submit patches to AOSP and AndroidX, have them reviewed, and merged. There are uncountable AOSP forks out there. I'm just not sure how much more open-source you can get? Unless you mean "open governance", which I could get behind.
LoRA conversely has different downsides. LoRA can be used in two ways: merged or unmerged. Unmerged (which is how it's trained) incurs a non-trivial computation cost. Merged means you are modifying the model weights, which means you are stuck with that one model on that device (though, this usually applies for most implementations for the unmerged versions too).

The benefit of prompt and prefix tuning (note: these are two separate methods) is that you can serve different soft-prompts and soft-prefixes efficiently with a single shared set of model weights.
I'm paying for ChatGPT and I don't care about this any more than the many, many other services I use that have at some point had an embarassing security issue.
Thank you for taking the time to provide the detail. I see now that the subject is quite a lot more complicated than I thought, and it's less about wealthy versus not-wealthy but rather a list of X versus Y, where X and Y are not what you would necessarily expect, such as gvmt versus citizen, etc.

Again, thanks.
Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa.

Spoiler tag on that last sentence please.
I imagine 1% of Google is well more than 15.8% of Bing :)
I wonder if a sign posted clearly on the door that says:

Surveillance underway.
Entering this premise
means you consent
to public domain
of its audio/video.
No ifs, thens, or buts.

will work.

IANAL.
Yeah, everyone rushed to try these magic search bots. Didn't heard anyone who gave up search for these.
I haven't used any plugins like Wolfram, but previously today I tried to get ChatGPT to calculate the width of my monitor. It answered something that was almost right, but actually wrong because of both a logical error, and a misplaced parenthesis. If you don't double check its result, you would probably think it was correct.

Here's a screenshot with my annotations [0], and here's ChatGPT's answer copy pasted if you want to try and spot the errors yourself:

A 24" monitor with a 16:10 aspect ratio has a diagonal screen size of 24 inches, which is equivalent to 61 cm.

To determine the width of the monitor, we need to use the aspect ratio, which is the ratio of the width to the height of the screen. For a 16:10 aspect ratio, this means that the width of the monitor is 16 units for every 10 units of height.

To calculate the width of the monitor in centimeters, we can use the following formula:

Width = (diagonal size^2 / (1 + aspect ratio^2))^0.5

Plugging in the values we have, we get:

Width = (61^2 / (1 + 16/10)^2)^0.5
Width = (3721 / 2.56)^0.5
Width = 54.2 cm (rounded to one decimal place)

Therefore, a 24" 16:10 monitor is approximately 54.2 cm wide.

[0] https://i.imgur.com/mStAiXx.png
I got access a while back, but haven't tried it yet. I don't have a windows machine to run Edge on.
> The cynic in me says that there will be Chat-GPT generation of kids that won't be able to think rationally on their own

This is, unfortunately, already happening. I've seen a terrifying number of users on Reddit uncritically using ChatGPT as a "source", or expecting (largely unsuccessfully) to have it give them expert guidance in performing tasks like writing software.

Making ChatGPT available to the general public, even as a "test", was a mistake. It's simply too good at sounding convincingly authoritative while being completely wrong.
Can you point to a single usage in the context of property prices where "being down X%", without specifying that X is referring to a YoY increase, means what you say?
> I think it'll do wonders in the world of office automation because it seems to have the ability to succeed at this much better than any previous "no-code" attempt where the logic would almost always end up requiring people who are basically programmers for it to work. I think GPT will help here, requiring less "superusers" for a department to move their data flows into automation. Especially in areas, where efficiency and stability aren't necessarily that important if the automation-tools mean you don't need three full time employees moving data from one system to another.

Yeah, at this point I think this is a valid use case for GPT-4 in its current form. I would be comfortable using it to build internal process tools or standalone things like a simple browser extension. Nobody in engineering at my company would be dumb enough to let me start monkey around with our actual codebase though.
> I've read that book and it's not aimed at children. No sane educator or library person would offer that to a young child.

It doesn't belong in a high school library either.

I thought they were exaggerating when they said it that book was pornography, but holy shit it was literally true.

What's next? A hentai section in the school library next to the manga?
I think the current situation makes a convenient argument for a class war running amok.

I think fewer folks are willing to talk about what lockdowns did to the supply chain.
So, the parts where AI makes human labor irrelevant, and where that's a disaster for 99.999 percent of humans unless the whole economy is restructured, isn't exactly news. If ChatGPT doesn't do that, something else will. It wasn't going to be more than 50 years no matter what, and now I don't think it'll be more than 20.

The part I'm finding is kind of a shock to me is the impact of the centralization on what you can even think about doing. If your application falls under their random definition of "unsafe", then you can't do it. Not even manually, probably, because the infrastructure for that will go away. If your one off question or task doesn't meet their approval, it doesn't happen.

Basically not only do the owners of these things become the only really important people in the economy, but they also get a new kind of direct control over people's lives.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant, but occasionally the vampires wail.
Aside: The international urls for this site are annoying for sharing. I understand it of course but like this one shared as /fr/ when there's already been other posts this week about same thing but on other urls

main url should be canonical https://frame.work/blog/introducing-the-framework-laptop-16 which redirects to local urls (which of course also are likely all in english for the blog post) and was shared earlier

not to mention the main product page shared days ago
> If you oppose top-down meddling in public education then I assume you support vouchers? That's about as bottom-up as things get.

Bad assumption. That's a fundamental POV difference between "I pay taxes to fund the public education system" and "I pay taxes to pay for kids to go to some school". The notion that those tax dollars belong to the parents and not specifically the public school system depends on which of those you think is, or should be, the case.

For my part, if the money's not exclusively funding the public school system, I don't want to pay any taxes toward schools. Talk about bottom up!

[EDIT] FWIW I'm actually for allowing districts to experiment with this, because I doubt mine would do it and I think the results would be hilarious, but would prefer not to have to move to another state to avoid it, so would rather the red parts of my state not impose it on my district.