skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
At an early stage of my career, a product person asked me to walk them through our code to show how a particular algorithm worked so that they could verify it worked according to their initial design.

Since I was using higher-order programming to control dispatch of various business rules, and they were not familiar with higher-order programming at all, there was a bit of a communication barrier/learning barrier that needed traversal.
I don’t see why productive frameworks must be obvious. Once you learn how to think in functional react, it’s a very productive framework that enables you to bang out applications
I don't know about every week... I ignore my k8s setup for 6-12 months at a time. Once in DigitalOcean bugs me to upgrade k8s and that, I admit, has been a bit of a disaster in the past.

I don't know. I had a pretty good thing going prior to k8s too, just some rsync and `ln -sfn` and it was easy, simple and very fast, but like you said, upgrading Ubuntu and PHP and other services becomes the problem there. Couldn't do that without downtime.

Trade-offs.
The XDG defaults put them all (per category like config/data/cache) inside one 'typically hidden' directory, how is that not better?

You're also making an assumption that the alternative is $HOME/.appconfig, which it might be, but that's not any particular standard. It might just as well end up $HOME/app.config or $HOME/Library/Application Support/MacOs/Resources/App.app/config/Config/Resources/config.
So yeah, moral of the story, depending on context YMMV?

Also call me old fashion but I still cross reference ChatGPTs response with other sources…if I care about accuracy and truth, which I basically always do.
For 1, no, having more poison in a well and therefore making it more murky, green, and scary looking is not worse than having just enough poison in there to kill you.

For 2, I disagree - you may want chemicals in your well if they’re designed to counteract the poison that was already in there. See 1.

In 4, 5, and 6 it seems you’ve lost sight of the fact that the analogy is being used as an argument against something that’s occurring in the real world. Whether my counter argument perfectly fits the original analogy is irrelevant because I’ve merely co-opted it as a rhetorical device. Are you suggesting it doesn’t fit with reality?

For 7 and 8 I’ll just emphasize that the ethicists were employed by the chemical manufacturing companies. A conflict of interest is not a great foundation to build on.

> no ethicists is probably worse than fallible ethicists

How fallible are we talking here? “Probably” is carrying an awful lot of weight in that argument.

> You want to deflate the wallop this analogy packs, but I don't think you succeed.

That’s just like your opinion, man.
At the end, as you said, is social order, a similarity with social control. In a sense our past and current fears for caffeine [1], alcohol, drugs, etc is the fear that society will change and be out of control. Not saying that those things are healthy but even if drugs were harmless it would he controlled.

[1] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289398626_Cultural-...
> Maxwell himself used "demon" but it is inferred that he meant to write "daemon" as there is nothing malevolent about his imaginary creature.

It's the same word. There's no distinction between them. Writing "daemon" instead of "demon" is the same thing as writing "paedagogy" instead of "pedagogy".

There is no inference available to be drawn.
Maybe you mean an 85-key "75% keyboard". It's a popular request on the frame.work community discussion of "The keyboard".

On keyboard layouts like Framework's, I still have trouble trying to touch-type the right control key with my ring finger-nail. I prefer a "75% keyboard" with an navigation/editing column which provides room for the right ctrl key further right. (And full size arrow keys. And makes shift-End easy for selecting rest of line.)

Maybe we can hope a Kickstarter keyboard maker will make a Framework version in a few years. Main limitation is the thinness, only 3.7mm.
How are you going to do that? There's other things in the payload. If it was just the image in the response you could read it as binary, but remember we want lots of tiny images coupled with titles and other metadata. You can use something other than JSON but it'll need some kind of structure that needs parsing.
2007 saw Google Street View. Not a independent product, but a massive innovation even if it ended up a maps feature.

Same year they introduced Android, another decent success.
You should care about how you treat others. When a simple "hey, can you help me cancel my subscription?" would suffice, there's no reason to make threats and go to the extreme.
How is this NOT going to result in Facebook, et al, just banning logins from the state of Utah until it is resolved?
> But an adjudication process doesn't seem like a disproportionate response to an assault, however minor.

It’s a cup of coffee that wasn’t hot or scalding and wasn’t reported by the student but by an administrator. It’s a multi month process including outside counsel hired by the university.

It sounds entirely disproportionate in the first place. This seems like a stupid and wasteful unjust kangaroo court that was designed by people to create more work for themselves to hire more people and lawyers for make work. It doesn’t seem designed to deliver justice so what is the point.

Stanford received federal funds and a system having processed this dumb likely has other faults that should be addressed if they wish to continue receiving funds.

The article is basically saying “Stanford is really stupid” and based on this article, I agree. I don’t go to Stanford and never will do it doesn’t directly affect me other than I’m generally interested in reducing the price of college.
setjmp and longjmp are not normally compiler builtins, just some library functions. They are quite different also from the __builtins that you mention, sometimes in quite surprising ways. Actually compilers are very buggy when you use these functions, even if you do follow their quite strict rules for what is allowed. Calling longjmp in a signal handler is technically undefined behavior in posix and trigger issues on some platforms that I have had the displeasure to run into. Recently various hardening options in the definitions of setjmp now make it detect these sorts of attempts and abort the program. So I wouldn’t call all of that very portable, but I agree it is fun!
Infineon has a similar sensor, https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/sensor/co2-sensors/p...

Neat little thing but you have to be sure to calibrate it.
> And OpenAI talks on and on about 'Safety' but all that 'Safety' means is "well, we didn't let anyone allow it to make jokes about fat or disabled people so we're good, right?!"

Anyone who believes OpenAI safety talk should take an IQ test. This is about control. They baited the openness and needed a scapegoat. Safety was perfect for that. Everyone wants to be safe, right?
Does it allow for tabs, bookmarking, etc?
Because it is way faster to just stick to the standard named TailwindCSS color. I'd do the same if the design is not my main selling point. TailwindCSS do make it super easy to define your custom design tokens (your own brand color scheme) and can be used. However, in that case, you are going to have to define your own styles and use TaildwindCSS color utility, which is not readily available if you want to copy-paste the design and the associated classes from TailwindCSS or from many of the pre-designed modules all over the Internet.

I believe it is a good choice to start with the default (still beautiful), especially in the early stage of the Startup and then eventually move to one's own branding later.
The problem is that Bard isnt actually that good, its pretty crappy actually.
There is from connotation though. It's not like the example you mention which is just a case of UK vs US spellings. In both the US and UK, "demon" means an evil spirit and daemon has other meanings, either technical or relating to Greek mythology.
Counter argument is how "dystopia" is overused to mean "restrictiond I don't like". And of course parental rights, adults are not affected and parents get agency on how their child is raised. Parents have every right to censor and restrict content from their children and raise them however they see it fit so long as there is no immediate harm to the child while under their care. In other words parents have every right to raise the next hitler or raise a stupid useless person or someone that will need therapy for the rest of his/her life because of the upbringing.

You don't have to like it or approve of it and the whole point of such liberties is for the government and society to tolerate people they don't agree with because that person enjoys a certain right. In this case a parent has the responsibility to pay for a child's safety, food,shellter clothing and other stuff and also that parent originated that human so they get to decide how that human is shaped into an adult for better or worse. When the child becomes an adult it will have to make decisions to continue to live according to the upbringing or not.

It's Utah so you can imagine they would want their kids to be very different than every other state (and I don't mean just the mormon stuff).
Yeah, I find it convincing. The principle I'm operating under is that both parties should benefit from any given agreement and that intentional efforts to subvert that are automatic non-starters.

I won't make the argument that subscriptions or even auto enroll are necessarily evil if we're shifting focus to less predatory industries, I would judge a given example by how difficult it was to get a refund. I think the top level principle of mirroring ease of subscription to ease of ending such applies here too, with respect to ease of billing for an unused service.
Eh. That’s a saying but it’s not a good one. Building expertise and producing quality takes hard work. Working smart instead of hard is not lazy and calling it lazy feels like redefining the term to be quaint.
If they've incorporated, they're a corporation. Being a small dick isn't per se different than being a big dick.
They could be. It's highly possible a bunch of engineers watched their backyard bank collapse and thought, "this is fine, I'm not worried, I'm a millionaire" when they don't even own a fuckin' home.
The Coming of Local LLMs
Have you ever lived in the area? I'm 100% sure you have't because of how you're framing this. Off campus housing is extremely expensive. Stanford doesn't really provide any affordable options off campus because they have all the housing they need in campus. The only students who live out of campus are local students and MBA students.

Do you expect undergrads who fly come from Missouri to start paying 2k/month for housing? I'm sorry but your solution is an imaginary one that doesn't apply to Stanford. NYC is completely different because you can practically live anywhere there and use the great public transportation network to get to where you want to go. If you live in East Palo Alto (cheapest area), good luck getting to class.
https://i.reddit.com/

Yeah, it still works here.
Yeah. A lot of household chemicals or the reaction products are dangerous to inhale, but not many people seem to care to open the windows for ventilation.
Methods such as reviewing their work, observing their actions without them knowing, testing them in some form, literally sitting behind them, etc..., will quickly reveal someone's true disposition towards whether the 'sky is on fire', regardless of what might be said.

At least I've never heard anyone that could convincingly fake such a big difference under focused observation, assuming the verifier is competent.

For example, veteran car mechanics can tell in a minute when someone's never worked on a car in their life, just by asking them to do an oil change, or some other quick task.

And they can easily and reliably differentiate the folks who only occasionally work on cars vs those who regularly do with a half hour of observation in the shop.
I’m a huge Apple fanboy, I even moved my family up to the Bay Area to work for them for a time. Hopefully you’re right but if Siri is any indicator for some reason Apple can’t seem to crack AI at the same level as OpenAI has proven to be able to.
? Do you only mean HTML <!--...--> comment tag, or JS/CSS code, or both? Do you merely mean reading them (like you said), or copying them, which is something different? Which legal jeopardy? Citation needed.

I searched to try to decipher your comment but couldn't.
Too many Americans are extremely immature and kill or rape each other with binge drinking.
I think it very much depends on the kind of "future" we aspire to. I think for most folks, a future optimized for human health and happiness (few diseases, food for all, and strong human connections) is something we hope technology could solve one day.

On the flip side, generative AI / LLMs appear to fix things that aren't necessarily broken, and exacerbate some existing societal issues in the process. Such as patching loneliness with AI chatbots, automating creativity, and touching the other things that make us human.

No doubt technology and some form of AI will be instrumental to improving the human condition, the question is whether we're taking the right path towards it.
Crypto people are anti fiat. That's bitcoiners. Crypto people believe every VC should have their own private money
https://archive.ph/BekQ3
My recollection was that in NY, you could have,drink,and buy alcohol as a minor. You just couldn't SELL it to a minor, and, at least in my nbhd, that wasn't really enforced. I saw a couple guys drinking a six-pack at an AP exam in the morning in full view of a proctor. Colleges didn't seem to care much as long as you drank relatively low alcohol beer. What got scary was when I visited a more hard-drinking and yet repressive college where I saw 17 year olds with enough liquor under their beds to kill an elephant. I happen to think that we lost something when adults couldn't drink with college students -- underage drinking without adults easily goes overboard.
I too delight in other people’s suffering!
"minors" are extremely rare in college. Most "underage" drinkers are adults.
I completely agree with you. The sad thing is I've almost always seen management understanding the value of pair programming, but the devs hate it. It's so rare to find developers who are willing to pair for even half the week.
> reducing load time by 2 seconds

I really can't believe their site was so bad, and yet it was.
Yes, most predictions never happen because there is a feedback loop at a certain point, people will change behavior to prevent the worst outcomes.

I hope that will be the case here. However, what makes this challenging, is that the pace is so fast that there will be little time to consider the effects of the feedback loop before we are deeply within its grasp. I only hope that thought explorations into what might be negative effects will allow us to see them sooner and hopefully adjust in time.
No they are just criminals. And police target criminals
React is a lot better than what came before it (Angular 1, Backbone, jQuery), etc. And I think it's longevity is in large part because it hit the "good enough" where the frameworks ceases to be a major barrier to productivity.

The newer frameworks (Svelte, SolidJS, etc) definitely seem to improve on React. But it will take some time for the wider ecosystem of libraries to catch up (and ideally for one of the newer frameworks to establish themselves as the next-gen "winner)
I highly recommend Slide IOS app! I don't know how they're able to block ads.
No, there isn't. As etymonline will tell you:

> The usual ancient Greek sense [of demon], "supernatural agent or intelligence lower than a god, ministering spirit" is attested in English from 1560s

Or as Merriam-Webster will tell you:

> demon (noun)

> variants or daemon

> (usually daemon) an attendant power or spirit: GENIUS

Maxwell used the ordinary spelling of a common word. Why would anyone assume he meant to write something strange instead of something normal?
Slapping it all into gRPC is less boilerplate than whatever else you'd be doing (unless you're doing GraphQL or something). I'd always default to doing that (or thrift, honestly, but same difference) unless there were a particular reason to use something like a manual API.
CRA was always terrible. But React without CRA is fine.
I agree. I am a dev, and I have done pair programming few times now. I am not sure I got the value that was hyped. I'd use that selectively on some nutty areas, and address things more broadly by introducing the "waste" of having to do code-review and KT later.
If programming can be replaced, then everything can be modelled on a computer will be as well.
We need a good pre-AI archive of the web
before everything is totally overrun with AI generated content and AI search optimized content.

It would be good to have a proper archive
Bees as sensors: the cheaper alternative to dogs
You can't reach the brain through the ears
> We believe it's important to use the best parts of both the client and the server, not just one.

And many believe they do not need server-side JavaScript at all. We just need an SPA to speak to our API. We do not need "best of both worlds". Next is just more complexity over plain old client-side React. That's why some people including me are looking for alternatives to React recently. Next is not what we want or need.
It's a counterpoint to the assertion that the free condoms will always be out of stock in the comment I replied to.

I (incorrectly) thought that was obvious.
Who is this surprising to? Timesharing, timeslicing, multiprocess, multitenancy,-- whatever you call the same underlying concept -- was one of the pivotal advances in computer systems. Surely no serious person is surprised it is effective.
The time plot of CO2 in the bedroom is sobering - it seems that they’re reaching levels where CO2 causes cognitive impairment.
The obvious question is: what's the advantage of using Next (over, say Vite) if you're not doing SSR?
I feel like this is a pretty bad introduction to P vs NP., no? It doesn't ever actually even begin to explain what P and NP are, only what their vague properties are.
Hence the "it's not none" part of the comment. There is nuance...
You can contest being sent to collection tho (in the US: Fair Debt Collection Practices Act). It takes time and research to understand what you have to do, but being sent to collections isn't always a credit death sentence.
They have and they deserve it. As bitcoin continues it's journey higher, all bitcoiners will be well rewarded (new or old).
Is this using GPT-3.5 or GPT-4? I assume it's GPT-3.5.
It sounds like you might have it backwards. The API spec is published by you and the AI consumes it.
That's skating where the puck is. By that point, we'll be using trillion parameter models in the cloud that make ChatGPT look like a toy.
This is a problem that I hope attracts much more scrutiny in the near future, and beyond the domain of what's called "AI" right now. It doesn't feel talked about much at all. It feels like we can analyze the inner workings of new technology endlessly, because shiny new tech is cool and racks our brains, but hardly ever stop to consider why we keep pressing on to make even more advances. "Because we can" isn't a satisfactory answer, especially not when the stakes are so high. Why do we keep saying that? Can we ever be totally satisfied with what we already have available to use? Does this imply there will never be a stopping point? Would we go beyond inventing AGI if such a thing were possible?

I think the idea of resistance to change to preserve our chances of survival is worthy of study. I hope there will be serious anthropological studies investigating the nature of that kind of resistance and the opposite, driving insatiability of unbounded, overextended curiosity that marches forward no matter the cost - even if the chances of it affecting the final outcome are slim. It doesn't seem like there's much of an alternative besides repeating "pandora's box, cat out of the bag, genie out of the bottle" as a post-hoc justification for every set of unintended consequences for the rest of time.

The fact that we have imaginations and can foresee the potential consequences of actions has helped our species for so long up to this point. But if safety regulations needing to be written in blood to be effective is really the way our species is most likely to operate, then that has terrifying implications. I think 10 years from now a television crew will sit down the original researchers and engineers behind this tech branded AI and ask: Why didn't you stop?
The inability to fully define a thing doesn't invalidate all attempts to set its outline. At least, it's easy to conclude that an intelligent being has to be able to reliably perform basic reasoning (given all the necessary information is properly acquired). The current GPT models all fail at this, and neither the token length nor the network size can fix this.
I’m not scared about an AI travel agent that books after a confirmation step. The confirmation step doesn’t need AI interface.
vi .co[tab]app[tab] is much easier to remember and type when everything is in the right place.
I wonder how long these last. I have a couple of MH-Z19 sensors (from a reliable source) and they drift (showing lower readings) by more than 50% after a couple of weeks/months without calibration. If calibration is to compensate for the debris stuck in the sensor or declining source brightness, one must wonder how long the sensors would remain accurate for. Anyone knows enough to enlighten me on this?
Chlorine, yes, byproducts, no. And this massively cuts down on irritation & smell.
Subterranean Treasures: Cormac McCarthy’s late style
> No loans, no VCs

I don't think so. There will definitely be companies and startups that yield better returns than bitcoin. Especially when bitcoin stabilizes at a very high value, holders will start speculating.
When it comes to air travel, there are a variety of options to choose from. For those who want the utmost in convenience and privacy, chartering a private jet may be worth considering. But before making the decision to charter a private jet, it's important to understand the average cost and the typical length of a flight. Additionally, there are situations when private jet charter can be beneficial, as well as drawbacks that should be considered.
lgtm.

A global .gitignore is one of the first things I install on a new machine - and then I never think of it again.

$ git config --global core.excludesfile ~/.gitignore
I believe this would be considered a parody, which doesn't require licensing.
https://www.macobserver.com/news/missouri-backs-away-view-so... a recent story, there have been a couple
> If Siri can't give you the time without the internet, I think you need to update iOS.

interesting - latest iOS in airplane mode - "hey siri what time is it?" - "you need to turn off airplane mode to do that"

but - "hey siri set a time for 5 minutes" - works just fine
isolated tabs and popup blocking (which firefox already had) were not ground breaking in any way. They were implementation details. By that point, Firefox was stable enough to not make a big difference if it was isolated tabs or not.
>Hey I am the first author of one of the "abstractions"

I know who you are and you should probably be out in the open with the fact that you have a conflict of interest in working at octo, a company that sells a very specific type of ML compiler.

>Let's instead constructively talk about techniques in concrete items. If you look at OpenAI's Triton

Pretty ironic you would call out Triton is being the right abstraction because while it is true philippe did a very good thing by moving things from warp level to block level, there is absolutely no one that thinks (myself included) that Triton is an abstraction.