skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The tone of your response is, like the original article, more of a scare piece. And I'm not trying to make bleach "sound innocuous". Bleach, when used with common sense and whatever guidelines that apply, is actually innocuous. It's just a fact that some substances are actually innocuous.

Bleach has been used for cleaning and disinfecting for a very long time... people have used it daily for years on end in their jobs as dishwashers or whatever. If it was such a problem then people would have noticed the higher cancer rates, or whatever bleach-related diseases that actually occurr. The fact is that people in the US have had small amounts of bleach in their drinking water and it hasn't been an issue. People clean with bleach every day. It's used in laundry and all sorts of other things.

As a kid I swam in some over-bleached pools and it didn't hurt me or any of my friends. The same thing happened in swimming pools across the nation. I'm sure that we swallowed some of it as we swam, too. It wasn't a big deal then. It's not a big deal now.

I'm not a member of a multinational bleach consortium trying to trick you into using bleach against your better interests. If you don't want to use it then go ahead and stop.

The article talks about problems with bleach if you're a "professional cleaner". Ok, fine. Maybe pro-cleaners should have better ventillation sometimes, or respirators, or something else. Maybe they are using a very strong bleach and that's the problem. Maybe it depends on what they are cleaning and there is some reaction that causes problems. All are worth taking precautions against. But a regular person who occasionally uses bleach to sanitize dishes or clean a bathroom or whiten laundry? I just don't believe there is any hazard worth worrying about.
I appreciate the interest. However I don't really want my spicy and off the cuff commenting on this account to be tied to my real identity, because although my believes are genuine, they are often ones I wouldn't express in person because they're unpopular and ostracizing.

That said, I'll post in this new subreddit anonymously if you want to join and follow: https://old.reddit.com/r/aishift/
Why not try something different? Just because spacex does something well doesn't mean everyone has to copy spacex.
I bought a 12th-gen Intel Framework last summer when they first came out. Aside from some thermal throttling issues (that are actually kinda bad and common, and Framework support has been so far unable to address), and so-so battery life, I'm otherwise happy with it, after I got used to the screen's odd aspect ratio and made my peace with it being a physically larger machine because of that. (I'm assuming the driver for this was the need for a larger mainboard due to the expansion slots and connectors for RAM, WiFi, and storage.)

A bit bummed that they're offering a matte display option only now; I don't see it offered in the marketplace, but I assume it'll get there eventually, and the glossy screen is $179, which isn't too expensive an 'upgrade', assuming the matte screen ends up being priced similarly. The higher-capacity battery will come in handy, though I'll probably wait until the existing battery gets a bit older.

I'm not interested in a 16" laptop, but I really like the black keyboard area, though the two-tone black keyboard area with silver touchpad/wrist rest is kinda ugly. I wonder if Framework will eventually offer replacement input covers (for the 13") with different aesthetics. One thing I miss from my old Dell XPS13 is the soft-touch material on the input cover. One cool small detail on the 16" is they've dropped the built-in 3.5mm jack and added two more expansion card ports, with one of the options being a card with a 3.5mm jack. Really smart move there; satisfies both camps of people who want and don't want that jack.

I think the thing that is most encouraging is that it does seem like they're trying to settle into a yearly cadence for new mainboard releases, tracking the latest chipsets from Intel (and hopefully now from AMD too). I was a little worried that they wouldn't be able to keep up, since they're still a small-ish company. Certainly not going to buy the 13th-gen or new Ryzen boards this year, but it's good to know that, assuming the company continues to be successful, I should be able to upgrade in a couple years.
Where are you getting these facts? Sweden and the UK have the same per-capita murder rate, so Sweden being 1/7 the size of UK means 1/7 the total murders.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1315123/sweden-homicide-...

https://www.statista.com/statistics/288195/homicide-rate-uk/
Of course. Except the books being removed from school libraries are more like "Gender Queer", which includes a page showing two minors giving a blowjob and doesn't cover anything. Why do you think minors need hardcore porn in the libraries so badly?
Yep, if you look carefully a lot of the demos don't actually work because the LLM hallucinates tool answers and the framework is not hardened against this.

In general there is not a thoughtful distinction between "control plane" and "data plane".

On the other hand, tons of useful "parts" and ideas in there, so still useful.
Surely one solution is for the AI frameworks to each themselves understand the operating environment and choose the best implementation at run-time, much like the way they currently do.
The reason they do this is the same reason why visa and MasterCard cut off all ties with these types of companies. The reason is that if they continue to be "complicit" they run the risk of having the federal government attack them legally because of their ongoing involvement and controlled substances.
ChatGPT for Me: a copilot for your mind
... where are you buying your tomato sauce???

Standard basic common brands like Ragu and Prego have none of those. Tomatoes as the first ingredient, zero added sugar/syrup or food coloring.

I've never even heard of corn syrup or food coloring in tomato sauce. Do you have a source for that? Because I can't even see how it would make sense -- large cans of tomato purée are cheap enough already.
With these lgbt books bans, people express their vague fear of a dark ideology in the far future that will, in short, put animalistic desires on the pedestal.
Just be yourself.

If you have troubles with self-reflection, interpreting the non-verbal communication of others, or challenged by bias those are problems you will have to learn to solve. Modifying or restricting your personality to compensate will do you harm.
That's a good point and an interesting example, but it's also irrelevant to the question of human history, unless you want to somehow impose a monoculture on the entire population of planet Earth, which seems difficult to achieve without some sort of unitary authoritarian world government.
Wow so cool! Does this act kind of like a logger and would we be able to have access to the logs later on, or should we bring our own logger as well?

(Also just curious, are you guys just using D1 or KV under the hood?)
I think there's something to this. I have a theory that LLMs are implicitly trained primarily to impress people, since that's what motivates those who work on them, excites the general public, and convinces conferences to publish papers.
US Police raids home; sues homeowner over CCTV footage of raid
Reason I’m posting this is because the raid itself earlier got attention on HN in this thread:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34293904

Insert “we are not a police state” <here>

Potential suggested discussion: what are best practices in law-enforcement-proofing (think local/state police, not feds) our home security recording setups? Somewhere towards the beginning of our video police can be seen physically covering an outside camera, & towards the end they’re seen physically disconnecting the entire setup (to the best of my knowledge)

So, at this point the best thing is cameras hiding in plain sight? Stealthily integrated into furniture? Idk.

p.s. - this happened extremely close to my childhood home & where I spent most of my life.
Proliferation?
I'm wondering if they are just leapfrogging everyone by using the LLMs to write code faster.
This is frankly framework's problem, not mine.
Do you really want to be the person playing devils advocate with showing porn to children?
There’s just no way that’s true. Bleach rips the electrons right off. MRSA isn’t going to develop immunity to that.
<< I really just want to see people drop the pretense.

I posit to you that pretense, and I am not really joking, is one the few things that is keeping this civilization going. I personally would like the pretense to go on.
I always use it in pipelines to extract columns. I often use it for summations of numbers. Sometimes for more complex tasks. Get the job done.
The same is true for Chinese food in Netherland; it's mostly a Dutch invention. Or more specifically, it's Indonesian food for Dutch colonialists.

It's so incredibly ingrained in Dutch culture that the very first restaurant of any town or village is either a snackbar or a Chinese restaurant.
> But they're surrounded by people trying to help them get in.

Do you mean helicopter parents? Or referring to the administration?
I have ticket only repos where people can create tickets. They get pulled into a project and mentions across repos are still shown with status. We create issues from a user form too! It’s nice to get away from using multiple systems and get conversations so close to the pull requests.
You’re placing an artificial requirement on the definition in order to support your argument.

Copyright may be owned, bought, sold, transferred or otherwise discharged in the same manner that any other form of property is. Nothing about property inherently implies such claim exists in perpetuity.
The current hype around ChatGPT seems to center around asking it to solve small toy problems and being amazed it can do so. Is there a foreseeable path or game plan to get from where we are now, to being able to give ChatGPT access to your existing humongous codebase and having it submit PRs? Are we already there? I'd say that solving small isolated problems, or writing individual reusable functions or modules, is maybe like 5% of coding, if that.
As petty as this may sound, I really don't like it when laptops arrange their modifier keys as Control-Fn-Super-Meta. My Macbook has the layout Fn-Control-Meta-Super, which makes Emacs very nice to use. Every time I use a "standard PC keyboard" or Windows laptop, I can barely use Emacs because it just feels uncomfortable having to stretch my pinky as far as possible just to hit a key.

I know what some may be thinking, "just rebind the keys in software". But I also want the labels on my keys to not lie to me, and there is probably a risk of some software not respecting your custom keymap, too.

This is my biggest gripe with non-Apple laptops and one of a few reasons why I'm stubbornly using an old Macbook.
Are there any white rappers name-dropping Cashapp in a similar context? That seems like the obvious case you would need to address before making this point.
Many of the examples are things that a feedforward model like GPT-4 has plenty of capacity for, could do (eg all the real-world facts), and each example helps induce the transition between memorization and generalization so it will do. In some cases like multiplying large numbers, it can't no matter how many examples it's given (with a realistic number, anyway) - but every query firms up the ability to swap out Wolfram Alpha for any other calculator...

Wolfram is playing with fire here (https://gwern.net/complement) given that the output is going to, one way or another, assist training future AI models.
The original cover of The Hobbit has runes running along the outside; the runes read "The Hobbit or There and Back Again, being the record of a journey by Bilbo Baggins of Hobbiton compiled from his memoirs by JRR Tolkein and published by G?rge Allen and Unwin Ltd"[0].

I can read that because of my mum's books on doing fortune telling with Viking rune stones, which she kept near her statue of a Hindu god and some magic crystals.

At this point, calling one of the sacraments by a silly name is the least of my problems if it turns out to all be real.

[0] https://todayinbritishhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01...
Very good point and langchain will support these endpoints in no time, flipping the execution control on its head
New UI Enhancements in IntelliJ Idea 2023.1
Sort of. Even if you had simply isolated a group of Chinese people in a new location for a long period, you'd expect the food to evolve independently.
Yes, in presidential systems, sure. But who was talking about those here?

Montenegro is a parliamentary republic, and vast majority of Europe is either a parliamentary republic or a constitutional monarchy [0]

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_system#/media/Fil...
AMD 3:2 thin-and-light at a small overall screen size (but still usable) and with replaceable parts checks an enormous amount of power-user boxes. Getting off Intel was their last critical hurdle, and while for whatever reason it took them an eternity to listen to that (rather overwhelmingly loud) feedback, they finally did it.

I suspect the choruses will be much quieter now. If I hadn't already landed on a Beelink GTR6 mini-PC desktop + MNT Reform laptop, I'd be considering this finally - indeed, one of many reasons I went Reform over Framework originally was because Framework was married to Intel. And frankly, 3:2 still makes Framework tempting despite my lack of need for it.
Great example. I like broadcast radio. I don't like picking and choosing podcasts, I like to just listen to "what's on". I really like some of the live music content on SiriusXM (celebrity DJs, etc). I'm their ideal customer. And they'd have captured $300-400 of my value over the past 1.5 years, if they only had self-serve subscription and cancellation like Netflix or Disney+. But since they have decided to go the NYTimes route of "everyone pays a different price, and cancelling is next to impossible", they get nothing from me.
That's weird, I didn't have to lug buckets of water from the well today, nor did I need to feed my horses or stock up on whale oil and parchment so I could write a letter after the sun went down.
> Being tech enthusiasts means they're probably doing better than a lot of other creators

From what I've seen, LMG is a large corporation still being run like a startup. Considering how often they churn out videos about their file servers dying because they fail to do things like scrub their ZFS pools, I'm not sure how much actual tech knowledge beyond PC hardware specs they have. It's very much a lay person-oriented channel, not enthusiast-oriented.

This is exactly the kind of thing I expect from LMG. If this were to happen to, say, Level1Techs, I'd be shocked.
It's ultimately inventory costs and supply chain complexity to manage a larger number of laptop SKUs (CPU options * DIY/pre-built * keyboard options * any other configurable variable). We're a small team, so when there are areas of the product we can condense into having one default configuration, we take those efficiencies, while still enabling an "escape valve" through the Marketplace.
Xlinx VU19P, an FPGA with 9M logic cells
I added a chlorine injection pump to my well that adds a little bit whenever the main pump runs. Water quality very much improved.
Looking at your mechanical design for the large input module, though I can't compare the height at the moment, it appears to be almost the same size as the keyboard on the Framework 13. While it would obviously require a new input cover design, would it be possible to design an assembly that would allow a single large input module to be used as the keyboard on a Framework 13? Or would there be height problems?
Now where did I put that eraser...
> Turns out that in the middle ages, pizza was just round bread. Not remotely resembling anything we today would consider pizza.

"None pizza, left beef"?
Great question! The short answer is nothing! We just have to out pace them and make sure we develop a better product experience.

Two key advantages that we have over OpenAI.
1. We are open source and are trying to build a community of developers that can out run any single LLM provider.
2. We are completely provider agnostic, which allows us to aggregate and share common features across tools. (One analogy we like to use, is we want to emulate how dbt is database agonistic, and Helicone will grow to be provider agnostic)
openai wants to gatekeep access and use of their AI. so why would they ever release a local LLM? i think that would come from their enemies
This is definitely a great point! With the context of AI workloads, where critical matmuls are basically of regular large shapes, are there many cases where cutlass/Triton are worse than cuBLAS where we need to throw more GPUs at it?
Collections is mostly meaningless if you are otherwise financially responsible.

The entire system is quite abusive. You may try experimenting with "I don't give a shit", assuming your other ducks are in order. I have found it to be therapeutic.
The thing is that self hosting kind of already has cost gates.
Whenever I needed to buy another $100K of servers, we had to make a deck and have a skip level meeting 2-3 levels up to explain the capacity planning spend.

On the other hand, in AWS, at my last shop.. we were just .. doing stuff.
We at one point noticed a non-production RDS instance was going to run us $60k/year.

This was for some small part of our processing, that in on-prem land would just occupy a slice of one of our $30k servers. But in cloud, we had the pleasure of $5k/month until we noticed & turned it off.

At the scale our estate worked, we had easily 100 entities that could trigger this kind of spend.
Apply the same test to any other form of property.

What natural law gives you the right to own land?
Think you can land a plane in an emergency? Pilots explain why you can’t
The luddites during the Industrial Revolution in England.

Termed the phrase “the Luddite fallacy” the thinking that innovation would have lasting harmful effects on employment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite
You will remember the prompt you typed not the solution you copy/pasted
Reminds me when I was a bank teller - the area manager would come into our branch sometimes trying to like disguise himself...? But it was always SO obvious after about 10 seconds that it was him while he'd sit in the lobby and observe.

It was also impressive how fast word would go down the teller line that "corporate" was in the branch and everyone would sort of shape up for the hour they were around.
> This is an interesting and intellectually curious article, but it is not separable completely from the rest of the website

It sounds like we're agreeing. See what I wrote above about tradeoffs; I was editing and might have added it after you posted (sorry).

> there is a large "EXTRA! Listen to 'The Witch Trials of J.K. Rowling'" which is ideological flamebait that would not be allowed on HN, along with most of the rest of the website

Yes, that's one problem with tendentious sites: it's hard to evaluate an article independently of the provocations one encounters in situ. I think that's what we have to do, though. It's probably helpful to remember that this approach ends up irritating everyone in the long run—that is, whatever any reader's buttons are, something's going to occasionally appear on HN that pushes them—at least, if we're applying the policy correctly.

> use the internet archive rather than the original

I don't think that would help; it would just push the provocation to a different spot under the carpet. For example we'd get second-order flamewars about why site X was getting that treatment but not site Y. And I think it's pretty core to HN to have the (original) domain displayed beside a title.
they wouldn't ; i hope there will be an open source alternative. Firefox and chrome are open source
But real power is under Zdravko Krivokapić (prime minister). And Zdravo (pro Serbian) does like Mile (pro Montenegro).
Ask HN: Will personal websites gain traction as AI content floods the web?
Many of us has already experienced reading an article we believed to be of human origin, but in fact was written by an AI. As many posts on Twitter and the Fediverse has shown us, AIs can be hilariously inaccurate – it will happily tell us what it thinks we want to hear and invent stuff as it goes.

In this environment, where it gets harder to discern the veracity of information online, be it from newspapers, magazines and other types of information outlets, establishing trust becomes increasingly valuable.

Will this fact make us seek out more personal content from sources we can put a face and a name to? A personal web of trust that sharpens the line between content made by humans and AIs?

It might be to early to call it, but having pondered on these questions for a little while, it made me realize that my solution to this sea-change is to double down on collecting channels of information that verifies ownership, like personal websites, preferably on a domain name owned by that very person.

Maybe we could even make some kind of pact, a code of honor, a personal promise of integrity, that guarantees a site to contain 100% human generated content?
Node.js March 17th Infrastructure Incident Post-Mortem
> Hosts are also required to take an online “Party Planning Course”

Well, the way they are going, it seems Stanford admins are required to take "Party Pooper Course"
some things got better. did you notice i talked about a gap, not an absolute. so you are just saying you are satisfied with you got out of the deal. well, ok - some call that being a sucker. or you think that owner-investors are the only way workers can organize to get things done for society rather than the work itself.
From this account, you seem very unpleasant to work with. Anger just makes you more angry and bitter, you gain nothing by being this angry, and people who see your comments are hurt by them.

You said you keep it private and try to be well behaved, but it probably comes out in your interactions with others, whether you're aware of it or not.
Re: why 3d printing. Generally agree with your points, tho for early stages the iteration benefits outweigh the economies of scale.

BUT! Rocket manufacture in space.. that's where it shines. If you're a small Mars, Lunar or asteroid base and depends on rocket transit, you'll want full reproducibility on your side and complex economy-of-scale factories are not going to be feasible for a long meanwhile.
This is the reality ..

> When in human history have we ever intentionally not furthered technological progress? It's simply an unrealistic proposition ..
Worked on collections software for XX years. I definitely knew of a few clients that collected on behalf of gyms.

You'd be surprised what gets sent to collections. I recall one client that collected on behalf of a fried chicken restaurant.
The dystopia is already normal.

The firm can't really afford to care too much about why its workers entered their professions. The firm has to care about the cost of its inputs and margin lest it be devoured by a competitor or private equity.
Hopefully it doesn’t actually become THE “killer” app
It definitely is more complex than that but currently the most popular type of beer now was not the original beer (or was not among the first beers, certainly not until the 1800s) and is relatively modern.
This looks fantastic. Will try replacing our current fine-tuned FLAN-UL2 model with this.

I wonder how the devtooling around this will evolve. Seems like a matter of days until someone creates a GUI wrapper around this, and obviates the need to use programmer time for fine-tuning