skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As far as I can tell, useEffectEvent is just the useEvent hook but renamed to reduce scope. useEvent was originally going to provide performance optimizations when creating event handlers in a function component and it was going to solve the issue of event handlers causing effects to re-fire[1].

Now it's just going to focus on the effect issue.

[1] https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs/blob/useevent/text/0000-usee...
Fsck. I hadn't thought of it that way. Thank you, great point.

This era has me hankering to reread Daniel Dennett's _The Intentional Stance_.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_stance

We've developed folk psychology into a user interface and that really does mean that we should continue to use folk psychology to predict the behaviour of the apparatus. Whether it has inner states is sort of beside the point.
Much of the historical persecution of witches in Christendom stemmed from Exodus 22:18 in the King James Bible: “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live”. But even that appears to have been a mistranslation: the original text would be better translated as "poisoner" in modern English.

https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2017-08-17/ty-article/th...
Why poor little Linux? Those got what they wanted.

No gloomy project managers above you, just write the code you like, express yourself? Check

No telemetry to know what average Joe The Normie uses and wants? Check

No spending time on meetings and plannings, boring strategy discussions, just do a bit of here and there what your soul wants today? Check

Love to tinker and customize your setup without leaving a chance for IT department to standardize on software and settings rollouts, no MDM covering YOUR system ? You are out of enterprise - Check

Dreams came true, why poor?
I am extremely disappointed that US laws in almost all cases, seem to side with businesses, or at the very least turn a blind eye to very obvious consumer abuses. Actually, I’ll take that further: it seems like our system is designed to allow consumer abuse. I am shocked that our government is actually standing up for us, but I am being cautiously optimistic because lobbyists have a way of shutting that shit down real quick. Look at how ferociously corporate America has been fighting against proposed right-to-repair legislation. Yay for New York, but we need federal involvement on that one too, please and thank you.
Unreal (and Unity) are no longer just for video games ;)
Looking at the API, it seems like the plugins themselves are hosted on the provider's infrastructure? (E.g. opentable.com for OpenTable's plug in.) It seems like all a competitor LLM would need to do is provide a compatible API to ingest the same plugin. This could be interesting from an ecosystem standpoint...
Google is currently in an existential crisis on this front... Microsoft is already way ahead of the game when it comes to integrating LLMs into productivity tools & search. This recent product announcement about Microsoft 365 integration is almost magical:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf-dbS9CcRU

Best of all: Advertising needn't be the business model! And Microsoft is a major investor / partner for OpenAI.
This is odd, because I asked it when sunrise would occur tomorrow in $city_in_live_in, and it gave me the correct answer.

I asked about that, and it explained it has access to some real-time information, including weather, stocks, and news.
And if you scroll down you can see the glowing review that they got from Linus Tech Tips....

Who owns a stake in their company...Yiiiikes.
There is always going to be a chorus about something. Power users are impossible to please because they all have strong opinions but not the same opinions.

People will still want different screen resolutions, aspect ratios, keyboard layouts, etc. Now that AMD is available people will want particular CPU SKUs. It will never end.

I wish Framework luck, because they are targeting the pickiest userbase that exists.
I think Alexa is in huge danger here. Siri & Google have some advantage being pre-installed voice assistants that can be natively triggered from mobile, but I actually have to buy into the Alexa ecosystem.

Personally, I have found Alexa has just become a dumb timer that I have to yell at because it doesn't have any real smarts. Why would I buy into that ecosystem if a vastly more coherent, ChatGPT-based assistant exists that can search the web, trigger my automations, and book reservations? If ChatGPT ends up with a more hands-off interface (e.g. voice), I don't think Alexa has a chance.
How to Reduce Your Website Page Size
So, very corrupt? Not sure where you’re going with this.
Maybe they'd have a lot of extra returns if people from these countries didn't pay attention and bought a laptop expecting the usual keyboard layout for their languages.
It generating useful Wolfram Code and calling the API would be good but chatgpt being able to generate prompts for a much less expressive but more accurate (if it works) doesn't seem like that much of a step
I mean, it's not completely off-base.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdVMGKOFIwY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=413Fl0ScUsc
Or e.

Or the square root of G.
I was at the company when it happened. I'm currently at the company. I'm in ops and work on all of the mrsk/de-clouding efforts.
You get similar advice pretty much any time you get near a stage, because the audience is far away and can't see subtle movements. Also they're generally talking louder than normal.

I'm not sure that explains it all, but there are expected differences compared to how someone would move while talking normally.
Do you think the government is going to overhaul the banking industry and the KYC system based on this report?
Which is one reason I suspect it might not be true: not because Block is necessarily honest, but because everyone and their dog has heard of this scam and it's the first thing people would think of.
Our technology stack, and how we got here
He was just interviewed a month ago!

https://morethanmoore.substack.com/p/interview-with-jim-kell...

If he quit Tenstorrent, that must have been very recent.
Is OpenAI just extremely prepared for their releases, or are they using their own tech to be extremely efficient? I'm imagining what their own programmers do each day, given direct access to the current most powerful models.
Really impressed with this. OpenAI has its foot on the gas!
I think that review might be from before Linus invested in Framework.

Not that I can verify it because the Linus Tech Tips channel is still banned.
It is the earliest German bit of net culture to take an offramp from the information superhighway into regular culture - at least the earliest I know of. Maybe that gives it its staying power, humorous value aside.
> It seems like basically every knowledge worker can and will augment their workflows with this tech.

Alternately, 1/10 will be able to adapt to becoming cyborgs responsible for handling the same workload, while 9/10 get laid off
Unfortunately, I think this is a losing battle.

This is just a narrow representation of what is to come. Everything positioned against AI will be a losing battle. It is a skill/creativity replicator and that concept breaks the existing model of everything.
I've stopped using Stack Overflow almost completely (vs 10 times a day) and I don't miss it.
I also liked Transcendence, but you have to admit the path to AGI was vastly oversimplified. No one is creating AI by uploading their brain into a computer.
I can't read this past the part where he ridicules and trivializes the issue of trust.

Can I trust code that comes from StackOverflow? Yes. Not no. YES. That code has been vetted to some degree more than zero. Some human is taking a certain amount of responsibility for posting (an amount more than zero). And I understand the mentality and limitations of the people posting code there.

But in point of fact, I don't know anyone who simply constructs entire systems from merely pasted code from StackOverflow, so it's a poor analogy.

ChatGPT, by contrast is utterly irresponsible. I don't mind using it to blockbust through certain problems, but the idea of having it write my code and then simply presuming that it works (which all the commentators who laud ChatGPT do-- they just declare that everything is great without seriously testing it) is morally wrong. If I did that I could not be accountable for it.

ChatGPT can do amazing things. What it can't do is be responsible for itself. That's why I want Congress to regulate its use.

It has always been the case that humanity is divided into people who are comfortable with cheating-- happy to take whatever they can get without being jailed or killed-- and people who believe in a caring and lawful society. ChatGPT is a great gift to the cheaters, and it makes civilization all the more vulnerable.
> The choice of what to read must be left to the reader or, in the case of children, to parents. That choice does not belong to self-appointed book police."

Does it belong to people selecting books in these school libraries even when it goes against the wishes of the parents?

While no one should be able to censor what book adults can read, the school libraries are tricky.

It was easier to have a consensus on what society at large was finding acceptable when the viewpoints in society converged. Now on one had we have parents who things taking their kids to drag shows is open-minded and surgical sex change in kids should be unconditionally supported, on the other we have various religious groups with their own dogmas.

What we expose the kids to obviously does have an influence (at least statistically) on what they will think in the future. So there's a big political power in controlling it.

So do we just limit everything to subset super-majority finds acceptable?
When you develop a plugin, you provide a description that ChatGPT uses to know when to call that particular service. So you don't need to tell people what they need to use - the model will decide independently based on the plugins you enabled.

That being said - we developed a custom plugin for Qdrant docs, so our users will be able to ask questions about how to do certain things with our database. But I do not believe it should be enabled by default for everybody. A non-technical person doesn't need that many details. The same is for the other services - if you prefer using KAYAK over Expedia, you're free to choose.
> They apologised after getting criticized¹, but as Mike notes, someone consciously put that text there. Was that some experiment by their publisher? To get young adult readers to get used to such silly stipulations in order to turn it into law later? If I was one of the authors I would be pissed at the publisher² for slipping that in and damaging their reputation.

My bet it was put there by the author (who blames their "formatter"), because wording and sentiment are amateurish. I'm also getting strong vibes that that book is self-published. For one, it's a looks like it's a trashy romance novel, and I understand self-publishing is pretty common for those, and the apology Facebook doesn't mention a publisher and makes it sounds like the authors are running the show.

In any case, the inclusion of that example give me a poor opinion of this article. The author isn't above digging up stupid stuff done by some random ignorant boob to fuel the outrage machine.
Except you won't if you want to make money because then you don't have a business
Yup. Exactly that.

A hard limit on the amount of office space per square mile. You simply can not build any more offices. The market forces then will take care of distributing the office space accordingly.

If you absolutely NEED to have an office in The Downtown, then you will just have to pay $$$$$$$$$. Otherwise you'll have to rent an office in a nearby suburbian village center.

Kind of like we did cap-and-trade for sulfur emissions.
My favorite thing to do with ISPs is to schedule cancellation at 1PM and then schedule installation as a new customer at 2PM.

"Can I get the new customer rate"

"No that is only for new customers"

"Okay I'd like to cancel"

"Great, anything else I can do for you today"

"Sure, I'd like to sign up for new service"
Higher-order Type-level Programming in Haskell [pdf]
"The word gaslighting (referring to the behavior described in the above amateur psychology section) is occasionally used in clinical literature, but is considered a colloquialism by the American Psychological Association.[0]"

I think APA considering it a colloquialism would count here as a psychological term.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting
>its desire to neckbeardify its users is its undoing.

Uh, no, because Linux isn't currently, nor was it ever in the past, successful or appealing because of how much it caters to normal users.

It's been successful and appealing based on how much it caters to techies (my earlier post).

That Steam decided to support gaming on Linux is why its market share among Steam users has fluctuated around 1% and why Linus Tech Tips did an exploration video about it, but if you're already measuring Linux's success based on how many "non-neckbeards" use it, it's already undone, and it was always undone (and, if anything, arguably getting slightly less undone, as its ease of use for and popularity among normal people has grown significantly over the last 10 years). :p
>Without even reading what apt is complaining about.

How many users switching from Windows do you think will read about apt when they've been sold the idea that Linux is now great for gaming?
He claims to be 70 but it's been disputed widely - I don't have the energy to filter signal from noise though.
Here is a video on how it can be used with a vector search database like Qdrant to retrieve real-time data.
https://youtu.be/fQUGuHEYeog
HowTo: https://qdrant.tech/articles/chatgpt-plugin/
Disclaimer: I'm a part of Qdrant team.
The article was already flagged, so I'll bite.

> All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

-14th Amendment, United States Constitution.

Whatever you think about fetuses, they haven't been born yet.

A fun party trick is to ask the gathered crowd if they'd prefer that abortion were legal, but unnaturalized residents have no rights, or that abortion isn't legal but all rights are extended to non-citizens.
The difference is unlike self-driving and crypto, LLMs are providing value to people _today_.

In my personal life, GPT4 is a patient interlocutor to ask about nerdy topics that are annoying to google (eg, yesterday I asked it "What's the homologue of the caudofemoralis in mammals?", and a long convo about the subtleties of when it is and isn't ok to use "gè" as the generic classifier in Mandarin.)

Professionally, it's great for things like "How do I recursively do a search and replace `import "foo" from "bar"` to `import "baz" from "buzz"`, or "Pull out the names of functions defined in this chunk of scala code". This is without tighter integrations like Copilot or the ones linked to above.
OpenAI and Microsoft have been killing it not only in product but in the go-to-market work they've been doing long before launch. Really superb work.

With seemingly every launch, they have a slate of really compelling launch partners already using the new service, giving them a big press bump (from the articles those partners write) and social proof, and of course the product is better because it's already been tested with real customers.

Masterclass in product management.
It seems to me rather, that you are using a definition of "capitalism" that is distinct from and perhaps at odds with how other people are using the term.

The definition you're using seems to be clearly a far-left, anti-capitalism interpretation which has essentially inverted goals/motivations with side-effects/externalities compared to what a pro-capitalist, market-oriented type of person would suggest.

Basically, you're suggesting that regulatory capture is a goal of "capitalism" and while most people would say that's an anti-capitalist failure of government.

Everyone agrees regulatory capture is bad, so maybe we could all work together to fix that badness regardless of abstract differences of opinion.
That and the Dave2D endorsements have been there since the first laptop.
They should change the system so it is. They introduced chip cards to improve the system and they can introduce this change too.
> PDF provided more fidelity for printing, had better tooling

This might have been true once, but using Acrobat now is so painful. Of all the apps that work, Apples Preview is my editor of choice and when I’m on Windows I really miss it.
With enough accurate data (and time, as these toxins aren't really fast acting) you could get to causality with the right kind of statistical analysis. Typically, counterfactual analysis and some DAGs.
Bing image creator seems to be on the right path to freemium: you get a few priority requests and then get bumped onto the slow free queue. If the thing keeps getting better as fast as it is right now they'll have lines in the checkout page.
This is what Apple's Siri was meant to be. Apple bought Siri from SRI international (Siri = SRI), and when it was launched was meant to include ability to book restaurants etc (thereby bypassing search), but somehow those capabilities were never released and today Siri still can't even control the iPhone!

My hot take on ChatGPT plugins is a bit mixed - should be very powerful, and maybe significant revenue generator, but at same time doesn't seem in the least bit responsible. We barely understand ChatGPT itself, and now it's suddenly being given ability to perform arbitrary actions!
I disagree. I'm completely tired of mannequin NPCs. Anything that will make it easier for NPCs to behave like living things is a win in my book.
> Alternately, 1/10 will be able to adapt to becoming cyborgs responsible for handling the same workload, while 9/10 get laid off

Somehow, vastly decreasing the cost per unit output for the work won’t increase the market clearing quantity?
<aside>

Joel is a great but credit for this goes to Rico Mariani, originally quoted here https://web.archive.org/web/20100514093413/http://blogs.msdn...

</aside>
You can revoke a subscription in PayPal.
But he wants you to move fast all the time, so he can reduce hours somewhere as a result
> What about chatting with people in a browser? Doesn’t matter whether you’re using Facebook, Google Chat, LinkedIn, or just chatting with a customer service agent: if you’re having a conversation with someone in a browser, all that shit started life as a teeny demo of 2 engineers sending messages back and forth over a “hanging GET” channel back in 2005.

I'm pretty sure web chatrooms have existed in the late 90s already.
I think you are right but it still implies that LTT has a valid unbiased opinion on the product now.
>If you're not with me, then you're my enemy.

Not quite.

Where free speech is concerned, if we don't fight for each other, we are our own enemy.
Sure, you had to suspend your belief at times (if I recall correctly they left in enough ambiguity to make it kinda work if you squinted a little), but the good parts more than compensated for that.
Not really.

The 7040 series is good, but its not dGPU class like an M1/M2 Max. I think AMD has been scared to make one because OEMs won't want it.
Nvidia is the one to invest in, though looking at it's performance since March 15th, it might be too late and it's already been priced in.
As someone who has been on a lot of conference committees, I wouldn't necessarily require proposals to be sent physically; that would create a lot of work for us. But I do favor limiting the # per person and asking questions other than just the standard abstract that might discourage people who are just spamming everything in sight. Friction isn't always a bad thing.
just store the one cycle and repeat it. nobody will know the diff
To me the logical outcome of this is siloization of information.

If display ad revenue as a way of monetizing knowledge and expertise dries up, why would we assume that all of the same level of information will still be put out there for free on the public internet?

Paywalls on steroids for "vetted" content and an increasingly-hard-to-navigate mix of people sharing good info for free + spam and misinformation (now also machine generated!) to try to capture the last of the search traffic and display ad monetization market.
No, they're all correct, the question is just bad.

A dilemma isn't a logical fallacy, it's a situation. So when being asked what logical fallacies are being used against a suspected witch who has been handed this dilemma, you could only be speaking of the judicial process which put the accused witch there. Having been given no specific information about this witch and that process other than the dilemma posed by the trial, these five are some that may have come up during that process.

edit: admittedly it's pretending to be sure these things happened, but asking the question implies there would be some basis on which to give a meaningful answer, although there isn't one.
Neat. A few years away from sending fiverr to outsource acting to a developing country while face animation and voice gets synthesized.
Lol, networking people has produced little of real value except the paradigm itself, and social networking is little more than making humans more efficient at marketing to each other. Networking is for DATA. When people behave like networked machines... well that's global capital communism tbqh.
>Implicit in the article is an assumption that life is lacking, and I'm not sure that is a healthy outlook.

It's essential to the eventual "I have a course/lifestyle/Notion template to sell you" pitch that people like this are going for.
The customization goes further than just yes/no to the number pad. Looks like a whole "Input Module system" that could open up opportunities for different keyboard designs (DVORAK, various locales, maybe different switches?). I love this idea, excited to see what folks do with it. Makes me think of Apple's Touchbar nonsense -- why force a number pad, or a second touchscreen on folks who don't want one? Such a good iteration on the Framework idea.
absolutely... not.

!pip install jupyter-chatgpt
!chatgpt make me a notebook with this dataframe with such and such plots

> here you are
I'm sorry, I should have specified that I meant "Greater Houston Area", not the Houston proper.

It's what people mean by saying "Houston" anyway.
Liquid Chlorine worked the best in my use case. Bought a house in Florida with no bathroom exhaust fan. Fought tooth and nail to keep it at bay. Squeegeeing the walls, apply after shower mildew/mold inhibitor. Nothing worked.

Liquid Chlorine did. Open bathroom window, placed a fan in front of it and sprayed down the entire shower heavily. Yes the smell I was powerful, I wore a respirator. It's been over a year and we haven't had it come back at all. We still squeegee and apply mildew/mold inhibitor and we now have a very high powered exhaust vent in the master bathroom.
This comes at the price of now both OpenAI and Wolfram getting access to your queries (when you use the plugin, of course). I’m hoping we don’t slide into a future where you either have to give up on confidentiality and privacy or else can’t use any “modern” tools anymore.
Protobuf-ES is the only fully-compliant Protobuf library for JavaScript
The results are in: Protobuf-ES passes 99.95% of conformance tests.
LTT reviewed the Framework laptop before Linus decided to invest into the company.
New math formula answers long-standing party problem