skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This niche industry probably keeps wondering why nothing gets mainstream traction.

It's because they always miss one or two of the ten vital check boxes to get tech influencers (meaning, at the individual group level, more drilled down than "network effect") to jump on board.

One of the most vital check boxes: supporting whatever major method techies are currently using to avoid SMS/MMS.
I appreciate how much they seem to pay out to R&D but I use them as an example of where build vs buy falls down.

Been going to the site for a long time. I only buy 501 jeans and the occasional jacket. The default sort on their product detail page is always "recommended", and it never recommends 501s.

And that chat bot was an absolute joke. I used screen shots of it to rant about AI years ago. Still get retailers with a fraction of Levi's budget asking about chat bots on RFPs though.
Communicating clearly doesn't require a high IQ at all, it's a general skill. If anything, high intelligence might be a detriment since a lot of the smarter people I've known can't or refuse to communicate clearly.
Obviously it would be worse if the valet started using my wallet and passport and business banking to steal from me, but it would still suck if they merely threw it all out the window.
Shutterstock has found an unlikely ally in AI
Docker hubs $5 per month plan is really good. It's a great service and great price.
Agreed. The more I write for a public audience, the more I realize that keeping people's attention is hard

Humor sounds like a great tool to keep people reading
Analogies are like children. If its your own they're a brilliant, cute, funny, unique individual. If they're other people's they're loud, annoying, stinky little pests and oh god they're swarming you.
They might secretly be a smartphone forensics startup.
I've found it extremely useful but also you are not wrong at all. It feels like it wants to do too much and the API is not intuitive at all. Also I've found out the docs are already outdated (at least for LangChainJS).
Any good alternatives? Especially interested in JS libs.
It wouldn't but it s auditable so we would know it wouldn't.

We can't trust that openAI is not creating risks
I watched the video. Chat GPT is impressive, but exactly as the person creating the video mentioned, the deeper you get into the project, the easier it is for Chat GPT to get confused. And Chat GPT has no idea it's confused. You have to point out each individual error, and the Chat GPT scans for it, makes a correction, and potentially introduces more errors. I don't see how you could use it with any confidence on a project with sufficient complexity.

EDIT

And here is something else that just struck me. The errors in the code are obvious the minute you run the program, particularly in the beginning when the population dies off after day 1. Chat GPT is apparently incapable of running the simulation to check if its code actually makes sense. It needs someone to tell it. Think about that for a second. Can you imagine a fellow programmer handing you a piece of code without bothering to try to run it first?

I can see Chat GPT as an advanced assistant who can save a programmer a LOT of time right now, but definitely nothing more than that.
It’s hilarious to me that you and the OP keep bandying about terms like “left” and “right” but don’t ever give any instances to support what you mean. It’s basically just hand waving - in other words, pretty meaningless other than “I don’t like their viewpoint”.
There are a few more indie podcasts I listened to that sold out in the last few years. Since then, they've felt both slicker and lazier.
I take it your dad want a low wage retail employee working Sundays? Not sacrificing everything to the grass good consumerism isn’t “stupid”.

> “Didn’t realize you were low on bread and forgot to get it Saturday oh well kids are not getting a sandwich in their lunches for Monday morning school.”

It is possible to make bread. And to eat other things. And to buy school lunches. And to borrow or trade food with neighbours.
Isn't clocking higher and thus completing the calculation and going back to sleep faster usually more efficient than clocking lower and taking longer to complete?
High-value targets, interesting technologies to steal, probably some shady secrets about some VC parties that could destroy some VCs or companies, source-codes, client data and trade secrets, info about unreleased products, plenty of reasons.
Just picked it up, thanks for the rec!

Here's the Amazon link if anyone else is thinking about reading it - https://www.amazon.com/Writing-10th-Anniversary-Memoir-Craft...
They need to move offshore. Iceland?
the data is compiled by programs.
Locked inside with "nothing" to do, one guy probably got high and had this "revelation" that would "help" everyone else locked inside /s.

It's sad because it has muddied the image of IA and it made them look like rebels when in reality they were doing just fine flying (somewhat) under the radar.

I've also read some comments here from people saying they would possibly stop donating to the IA because of this. Because of donations, the scrutiny is 1000x more for non-profits vs regular companies.
This is because HashKnownHosts has been turned on, the first value is a salt, the second value is a hash of the salt and the host name.
I think audiences and communities are allowed to decide what they want to listen to, not to mention reddit is a corporation. The first amendment does not apply
I experimented with focus modes a while back and found them lacking. Does what it says on tin but I guess I was after Do What I Mean, i.e. I wanted my phone to figure out what was important for me. Maybe I’ll revisit them!
Haven't made a comparison yet but would love to hear about any findings. So far, for the intended use cases, meaning narrative docs with lots of text, images and code, it works really well. We're still breaking up the Markdown into sections and comparing embeddings as this strikes a good balance between performance and cost, but will also plan to let users experiment with other approaches, such as sending entire corpuses of text to GPT-4.
how do we know that there are limiters if the model is closed source?

We "trust" NotOpenAI?
I don’t understand your problem with the tool being available in a VS subscription.

> Because of Microsoft. Microsoft is being unhelpful here as usual

Windows 11 can be bought in many places, including microsoft.com. All you need is a spare $140 or so. People pirate it anyway. Is Microsoft being unhelpful by expecting payment for software?
I don't want to try to recreate an exact code example on the fly (I'd surely get it wrong). But, there's [C++, rust, etc] code which uses seqcst and acquire/release together to set up this scenario: There are some memory operations on one location using acquire and release, call two effects that happen in some order A and B. Another location is manipulated using seqcst instructions with effects C1, C2, .... We are interested in possible executions where a certain thread observes a sequence of effects C... which is only consistent with A occurring before B. It turns out that it's possible to set this up so that those operations C still don't create a happens-before edge between A and B, and therefore it would be legal for a particular compiler+weakly ordered cpu not to forward the effect A to the operation B. This contradicts any theory based not only on a global total order (which is already more easily ruled out), but even on each thread having a local total order in which it observes all other threads' operations on multiple memory locations.

Setting aside that without a code sample my explanation lacks a punch line: If you "believe" the memory reordering explanation, then this is patent nonsense. If you "believe" the actual acq/rel semantics in the relevant specifications, then it's obvious (albeit unintuitive).

The problem is, this behavior really can happen, and it may not be that uncommon in complex systems where it is very hidden. Reasoning about these systems using the memory reordering theory will yield results which contradict actual executions on actual compiler/CPU combinations.
Moore himself said (mentioned in the link) that the “law” was just supposed to convey that the way to cheaper electronics at the time was to focus on transistors, I don’t think he ever meant it was supposed to be a law of physics that stays true 50 years or 100 years later. In fact he said it would be true for 10 years
Reading is somewhat painful for people if it isn't entertaining. When I write things that are information dense at work, I try my best to condense it to be mindful of people's time. It has worked well for me
Chiming in to say this is not an unreasonable standpoint.

It's not that you're likely to be victimized in this particular venue. It's that you should practice good habits if your device has, or ever will have, access or exposure to information you or your company would be damaged by if stolen.
The UK is reversed; their TV is more like our print media and their print media is more like our TV.

i.e. all the newspapers just print Tory propaganda nonstop and don't report on any scandals until they suddenly notice something happened a year after when they decide to not like the PM anymore.
> Yet public ownership undervalues water, in that one person’s access does not limit another’s, even though water is a finite resource. This promotes excessive, unsustainable and inequitable use. And it discourages private investment. In 2015, private-sector investment in water globally accounted for less than 5% of the total funds allocated to telecommunications, energy, transport and other basic services

(emphasis mine)

And that is supposed to be a problem ?
You lost me with this analogy. Is the thief wiping the contents of your phone? This sounds like you need to improve your backup and recovery system... what if you lose your phone, or drop it in the toilet?
chatGPT may be creating those articles

How do we know it's the "current public discourse"
>Did the emergency policy lend more digital books than the number of physical books locked in libraries?
We'll probably never know, but I think that was the logic.

The most checked out book, The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe, had ~850 check outs. I think it's safe to assume they didn't come close to the amount of physical books locked in libraries.

Not that it's very important, the pandemic policy is barely mentioned in this ruling.
Ha, asked and answered. I have a thing about uncaught references.
This shows that LLM AI, as dangerous as OpenAI says it is, cannot be entrusted to OpenAI for safeguarding its use.
Perhaps that will make the engineers that have the skill stand out more. Only time will tell
You didn't read very much of it then. Quoting the original post:

> We only currently have hardware configurations for MacOs/Windows and our expectation was that she will use Windows along with the rest of our team.

> She says that she can fulfill all job duties without Windows and I am inclined to believe her but corporate policy dictates WINDOWS and my management is not on board with her request for Linux.
I don't get where this "Everything must be free+ads' mentality comes from.
Netflix thrived for a decade using subscriptions, Microsoft and Apple's businesses are primarily subscription based.

AIs are so extremely useful to some users, that they'll gladly pay $$ per month to use it. And the size of 'some' increases radically with each leap in AI's capabilities.

GPTs don't have to be gimped to just search. Even GPT-4 today with wolfram alpha can obliterate most low-level tutors. It will be a personal tutor, therapist, coding assistant, secretary, storyteller, entertainer all in one very soon. People will pay for it.
Person that made a bad prediction in their life should never be listened to ever again, for everything they say is wrong.

Show me anyone that predicted two consecutive macroeconomic trends, ever.
Precedent for federal cases is typically first set at the appellate level. If you're working your activism through the courts, you usually have to lose before you can win.
Pulling out a stunt: "Look how many naive people gave us our phone, buy our security solutions to prevent physical tampering. We didn't even have a logo, we just drew on a paper and pen."
Would you invest money to a startup run by people willing to give up their phones (with personal information, mfa, passwords, contact point) to an investor event? It seems like the right alternative would be to leave it at home.

Maybe this is my inexperience or overabundance of paranoia but that would be a red flag to me. It takes so little to lose the castle to an adversary...
Also for now, our main focus has been on the DX: how can we provide simplest way for adding a prompt to an existing docs website, which also has great UX for end users reading them.
> It felt magical. Like the parties we had in the before smartphone era

This comment feels very foreign to me.

Very rarely do I encounter someone so glued to their phone that they can't interact at a social event. Usually that person doesn't engage much with other people and eventually stops getting invited to future events because they're simply not showing any interest in socializing. I don't even understand how someone works their way into a friend group if they're too attached to their phone to be socializing.

It's weird to hear about groups of friends who are all so attached to their phones that they can't interact unless forcibly separated from them (or from reception). And that's coming from someone with a very tech-heavy group of friends.
Canadian here: the CBC contributes to polarization more than any other media outlet in the country. It’s become a wedge issue that conservatives want to complete defund the public subsidies or even abolish it.
Not with such a completely one sided court case. If anything, this will probably kill the Open Libraries (lending digital books backed 1:1 by real copies of them) model of lending entirely (the court decision mentions no right to digitally lend copyrighted material). Publishers seemed to not really care about it before the IA covid library stunt, but now it might very well die.
Yeah I'll happily shut off my phone (not just put it on silent) but handing it over is too much.
I'm currently taking the approach of writing regularly. My thinking is that quantity will lead to quality

Also I'm eager to receive feedback on it. That's why I'm so grateful for the Hacker News community's comments!
True but at least 10 (or more on many keyboards!) important functions can be reached without hand gymnastics.

Frequent used functions like copy/paste should always have had dedicated keys for example.

And the home row thing is not something I care about. I don't type so much that it really matters.

But anyway like I said these things are really about preference.
The promise of kelp-powered flight
This guy seems to laugh away the fact that he gave the prompt in terribly broken and chunked up formats. I don’t think it’s surprising the model did poorly. Maybe the contamination issue is true. But maybe it’s also true that the model does fine on novel codeforce problems when you don’t feed it a garbage prompt?
A legend. RIP
Oddly, www.intel.com has nothing about this on its Canadian frontpage (https://www.intel.com/content/www/ca/en/homepage.html), but their newsroom does: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/newsroom/home.html
Well it could be interesting then, to see what happens to your phone and get knowledge as a security researcher.

Reminds me of the Evil Maid attack as pictured in https://objective-see.org/products/dnd.html
Ask HN: Is ChatGPT + Plugins a Google Killer?
Now that it can access the internet, why on earth would anyone Google anything and then go through all the SEO-optimized spam to finally find what they searched for?
My team has certainly accelerated the move away from Docker Hub towards our internal registries. And I don't see a reason to stop now. Just one fewer unreliable vendor for us to care about.
Wow, we have lost a true legend. As I get older, I marvel a bit at the giants I once shared time on the earth with. Sometimes it feels like we don't have giants in the 21st century in the same way.
> I take it your dad want a low wage retail employee working Sundays?

Is the low wages of retail workers less bad on the other days of the week?
I listen to Wait Wait, which sometimes tries to promote other NPR podcasts but never in a way that makes them interesting. For like a year they had an ad that was just an out of context clip from a Matthew McConaughey interview that made absolutely no sense to me.

Anyway, Wait Wait and Planet Money have paid ad-free podcast tiers now.

The rest do seem to be serial podcasts about true crimes or otherwise why you should feel bad about someone somewhere.
Okay, here's an article about calculating e to 116,000 digits on an Apple ][: <https://archive.org/download/Apple_2_Woz_e_Calc_1981/Apple_2...> (warning, PDF!). I found it interesting to read, even though I never owned an Apple ][, nor did I ever own a 6502-based computer (well, except for the Atari 2600). I was, however, able to apply the techniques to computers I did own (6809 and 8088 based).
My ISP stopped responding to pings to the next-upstream node so it's been annoying not having that as an easy way to determine internet uptime. I had like a year's worth of data and then it just... stopped.
It aint fucking lost on me that financial papers spent the better part of 2022 arguing that we were headed for a recession. The q4 numbers came in showing the US economy was still expanding and now those same papers are telling me we're in a banking crisis on the basis of like two and a half banks, with SVB and CS both being fully rescued.

The fucking owners of capital seem bound and determined to destroy their own system.
I don't think the target consumer for HoloLens is anyone most people would meet in real life, unless they work in very specialized subfields.

And I didn't include anything in the Azure area/time period.
No, this is dead serious
Ask HN: Email provider to send bulk of similar emails at a human scale?
I recently started a new business and wanted to move away from gmail. Following the community recommendations, I used Fastmail, a great alternative so far.
After sending +50 emails yesterday to contact potential customers and editing them manually to adapt the content to their business, I learnt that Fastmail banned my account without warnings because I was sending "spam" and suggested using automation tools instead.

I understand that email reputation is important for Fastmail but I am deceived that there was no warning and that I have to change email provider to send emails rapidly.

Anyway, I am looking for an email solution that would allow me to write emails manually that are 95% similar, without being banned. I am not looking for fancy workflows, simply an email service that won't complain about doing things that don't scale.

Any tool to recommend?
If anything, their "first sale doctrine" route seems like a stronger argument than fair use here. When you purchase a copy of a work, you have the right to lend, sell, or share that copy without any additional payment or permission required to the creator. This is how libraries have operated for centuries.

I think what IA was doing, making sure they only lend out as many copies as they physically own, was clearly within the spirit of that doctrine. But in the digital era, lending anything over the web necessarily means making a copy of it somewhere along the way, which laws haven't adequately adapted to yet.
Constantly? It's one wakeup in 4 months.
Some chromebooks can be flashed with seabios and no longer nag you about developer mode, and happily boot linux (or windows even)
how does a library get away with it.... they have to purchase the book first? is that how it works? how is internet archive different from a library, A lot of libraries are online right now and do the same thing.... It seems like a real harm if internet archive is forced offline because of a decision like this
> I’d more bet on “Warning for years that this is a point of failure but management wants to chase $shiny instead”

I'd almost guarantee you're right on the money with that line of thinking…
Right? I'd like to see a video. They must've just maintained control of the ball? Or were they actively keeping both goals?
Wow just yesterday a few days ago I watched his Oral History:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtcLzokagAw

What I learned is that I had no idea how semiconductors are actually made and how they made them early on.

Its really interesting interview!
> Author opens a PR.

Going back to what I said in an earlier comment:

"This seems to be just more evidence that for some reason, some people can't seem to imagine code review without pull requests. Maybe you have to be older, and worked before git and GitHub existed? I don't know.

Let me spell it out more clearly: a pull request is when the reviewer can reject your commit and force you to meet the reviewer's demands. Whereas you can have mandatory code review without pull requests, where the mandate is just that someone has to examine your commit and comment on it."

So let's start over:

1) Author commits to a branch.

2) Someone else reviews that commit and gives feedback.

3) If necessary, as determined by author based on the feedback, author modifies code.

This is an async process. There's no blocking.
You can get reusable phone lock cases for that reason. https://www.overyondr.com/howitworks
What makes Sunday so special? Why not just pass worker protection laws that prevent people from overworking, rather than dictating a magical day that nobody can work.

It's a stupid idea and a dumb law that it only makes sense if your worker protection laws are too weak.
>how does a library get away with it.... they have to purchase the book first? is that how it works?

Yes. And they can lend those books to people due to the first-sale doctrine, which allows the legal owners of a work to lease, lend or sell it without the copyright owner's permission.
I guess Bills of Attainder aren't real when it's about corporate persons. We'll be banning political parties next.
no. basically they're shilling for nestle water scandal type of operations.

edit: to those who down-voted me,

can you provide a reason why having more private profit driven investments on water is a good thing that we should aim for?

yes companies should not be allowed to hog a social good, and using an economics-style revalorisation will lead to the same dubious shenanigans done with carbon emission offsetting where companies will do some creative accounting to hide their value extraction.
They were always like that, just focused on New England where ethnic white identities still exist. Now they have anchors emphasizing their Latino identities rather than MIT educated car repairmen emphasizing their Italian identity or Peter Sagal making jokes about being Jewish.
True, but I always use a team or an organization if it’s an option because it feels more correct to me if the namespace is transferable. If a dedicated user account is the only option I’ll take it. Ex: Docker offered to convert namespaces to normal accounts which I would have been happy with.
You forgot the part in the middle where they tried to gaslight everyone about what kind of sunset was announced.
I resolve a lot of bug tracker issues (before actually opening them) that way.
LOL. Are you sure this arhive.is url is not in violation of copyright? - see "Judge Decides Against Internet Archive" [1] on HN today [2]

[1] https://file770.com/judge-decides-against-internet-archive/

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35297117
The constitution explicitly grants Congress the power to regulate foreign trade. Foreign companies do not have a first amendment right to operate in the US. This has nothing to do with the first amendment.