skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, the CEO was wrong. You're conflating a serendipitous use of open source software with a targeted exploitation of it. People decided to open source Linux, GCC, and other tools. So developers at companies use them, because they are available. This is not exploitation, though, it is the intention. Developers made these tools specifically for other developers to use them, even at their jobs.

The CEO, however, wants to convince developers to work on software that would drive value for the company. In essence, the CEO wants to trick open source developers. This is clearly doomed to fail.
I wouldn’t trust myself
to buy active ingredients for something like this in general. Dosing and mixing is highly controlled, because you can easily hurt or kill yourself by confusing which white powder should be 0.1g and which white powder should be 10g in a recipe.

I remember when DIY soylent was popular there were a lot of stories of people messing up doses.
I know this sound paranoid, but how do you know someone hasn't used ChatGPT-20 to hack the encryption used and that the video is "real".

What about how dire the consequences when this happens and the clip is America declaring war on China, but it's really fake and it's hard to prove?

We're entering some dangerous times for information.
I’m looking to put one together in Bay Area for next week or so. DM me if interested or if you know more people in the area.
>There's no reason for this to be user defined

This mentality is exactly why UX designers suck. It's all about some developers forcing their weird vision on everyone with no regard for user choice even when it wouldn't cost much to include because X study claimed something.
> It also replaced nearly all the electronics you bought from radio shack back in the day (eg. computer, alarm clock, radio, calculator, cd player, camera/camcorder, cordless phone, tape recorder). Quality improvement also applies to other categories as well, like appliances or cars. Finally, like I said before, the BLS breaks out all the inflation figures by category, so if you really wanted to you could make a "bare minimum to survive" index or whatever, although your initial comment seems to take issue with how the individual categories are calculated rather than how the categories are weighted.

Alternatively, multiple cellphones are required to replace a single calculator because they don’t have nearly the lifespan. They need constant recharging as they aren’t solar powered. And that’s not even getting into the UI issues due to a lack of keys etc. Objectively cellphones are a different compromise not a strictly better replacement. (let alone vs a computer.)

So again these comparisons are very subjective especially when something has upsides at the cost of dramatically reduced lifespan. The simplest argument for the BLS’s bias is comparing how often they accused of over vs under estimating inflation.

PS: Did you consider how fragile that 100$ Android phone is in your comparison? If so how much should you adjust the equivalent price for that fault? Which is the core problem as it’s easy to compare numbers while ignoring say Windows 11’s built in advertising when comparing equipment over time.
FAANG spending isn’t the norm, the total program cost of the Mars 2020 rover was $2.7 billion.

Meta spent $30 billion on something that looks like SecondLife on the Wii…

But also this ain’t the total cost just how much money the UK government is funding the project for right now.
It was always a stupid idea.
It literally isn't anything like saying that at all.

>>Is this seriously the kind of discussion you want to be having?

No, that's the discussion you'd prefer to have to detract from the actual subject of conversation in attempt to push your own agenda.
what a shame. income sharing agreements are a good idea, but this was poorly implemented and to make matters worse was done during boom teams, so it's no surprise what's happening now.
Yes! Actually, bioavailability was one of the first things that I wanted to track as there are studies w/ bioavailability data but they are often conflicting - having said that is solved by giving a generic range x%-y%. Again, if we go by the label then we suffer from the issue of trusting companies - so the medium term game is to produce CoA's since these companies are so reluctant to do so.

Since this is the top comment at posting - best way to request features is to follow on twitter https://twitter.com/backoflabel

signing up and logging in currently gives access to 4000+ rows (double the preview)
Does the prompt call for CBT, then?
The Pizza Show: From Deep Dish to Thin Crust

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0xDAUXPc8c&list=PLnPDn1Lb79...
Nope. They don't (spin at a constant rpm). Perhaps that's not so surprising; after all, it's not vinyl.

Furthermore, varying rpm is explicitly mentioned in the headline post.

Also explained here...

https://www.repairfaq.org/REPAIR/F_cdfaq5.html
No worse, possibly better, yeah. In a fair number of ways I prefer it over Java, e.g. reflection being so limited makes code dramatically easier to understand with confidence, because a large number of common reflection shenanigans in Java simply can't exist at all in Go. The clean slate and lack of inheritance also means the incredible towers of inheritance insanity simply don't exist - it's wonderful.

But I work on a pretty big system. The near-inability to both efficiently and safely abstract things is a big problem, and it'll be years before mature uses of generics truly start to address that... when it even can. Then I miss Java quite a lot. Or maybe more accurately Kotlin. Or sophisticated code generation and bytecode modification. Or MAT. Or...
The fact that it's WORM media also makes sense for medical images, where you really don't want them to be editable.
Thanks for the feedback so far - and kind words. I read everything so thanks to those who have asked for specific features they'd enjoy.

Kevin
Heavy handed police is a lot of it. So is more abandoned structures, which is an often-missing part of the conversation. The superstar cities don't have a lot of bandos that homeless people can hang out in anymore, Florida does.
calling articles about language features and/or their implementations a "smell" is some pretty insane stuff

the slice behavior you demonstrate there is well-defined by the language spec, it's totally memory safe, it doesn't demonstrate memory corruption or anything like that

go is probably the most successful new language since java, if you don't like it that's fine, but it's nonsensical to call its design decisions "wrong"
Besides tasting good, the main service this pizza performs is getting New Yorkers who whine about “it’s not pizza” w/r to deep dish to shut up.
> What about ZeroMQ over UDP? A remote time service. Pulling from a git repo.
>
> No really, I'm asking because I'm trying to figure out how to deal with all this in my tests right now, and I honestly have no idea. But I doubt Codeparrot is going to be able to intercept and intelligently mock everything.

In theory, *everything* can be recorded and replayed; that's the magic of patching-in at the application layer. *Any* function call can be recorded, and, replayed.

In practice, we support whatever is demanded by our customers. If people are ready to pay for something, we are happy to build support for it.
> If a person is smart enough to receive it, more education is almost always good.

This presupposes that college provides a good enough education. Arguably, the more you pay for school, the better the quality of education. A community college CS education is probably not as good as getting your CS degree at MIT.

I made the mistake of going to a college for my first two years with only two CS professors. I'd taken all of the first professor's classes, and the second professor grilled us on binary => decimal, no calculator allowed, on each of her finals (even for Cyber Security and Java!). Not every education is worth the ink the diploma is printed with.

> Of course money is a factor,

Money is THE factor. The cheapest educations that aren't useless are still too expensive for most Americans to afford. Almost nobody can pay for college up front, and the financing is extremely predatory. That's literally the crisis.

No matter how good "learning to think" is, college simply isn't the right place to do it for millions of people. It ruins futures, and knowing how to think doesn't dig you out of crippling debt that only gets discharged if you die.
Has the restriction been lifted? I asked chatGPT what it would charge for its services and it refused to answer and then argued with me about ethics and being programmed to help and all the usual bullshit. Is this via jailbreak? Do we really need to jailbreak to answer the interesting questions? Wow openAI really knows how to stand between themselves and happy customers.
What do you mean by "sale"? The article reads to me like a normal funding round, i.e. issuing additional shares.

A shareholder selling shares wouldn‘t increase equity.
Because you have a cycle of ~14 days of darkness and light on the moon so solar will need a backup.

Batteries are an option but 14 days worth of storage for a lunar base is probably asking a bit too much.

Also nuclear provides another benefit on the moon - heat which you’ll definitely need during those 14 days of darkness.
You can memorize every note of a difficult piano piece, but that doesn't mean you know how to play it well.
LLMs in a simple chat interface where you rely on the training data to provide the answer, are indeed unable to provide reliable answers.

LLMs hooked together with search engines, fact repositories (Wikipedia, etc) and other agent tools (for math, theorem proving, code checking, etc) can provide not only a reliable answer, but also a research plan it followed to provide it, and details on the fact-checking, and then discuss it with you.

Look at langchain and similar tools.
‘Forever chemicals’ deserve more EPA scrutiny
> In this human existence of timelines of information consumption, the sooner we confront and address new information the better. Isn't one of the most dopamine-inducing fun parts of news to be the first one to know about it, and be known to others you share it with as being skilled at keeping up with it?

My counter opinion - decreasing latency beyond a threshold is one of the most harmful things in humanity today. It makes it impossible to form opinions based on deep thought / Type 2 systems.

Similarly, one of the best ways to feel good immediately are cocaine or heroin. Fast news is cocaine - feels good now, but harmful.
Fosscord
go's authors were never against generics, they just didn't consider them a table stakes feature

go's generics are pretty good, i've never heard anyone disparage them as "bolted on" or hard to use
Might be useful for some - https://github.com/kashifrazzaqui/json-streamer
> Docker serves the basic functionality of a container as well as any other

I disagree. We've had multiple production outages caused by the Docker daemon misbehaving (usually causing us to run out of disk space). It also makes operations far more difficult than necessary; e.g. want to copy a .tar.gz file to AWS? Sorry, Docker's gonna insert itself in the workflow, and over-complicate the authentication[1]. Instead, I have a script which runs [2] in a loop; much easier!

> The workflows that forced you to migrate away from it are more complicated, I’m sure, than a procedurally defined dev environment.

The container I mentioned literally just runs `java -jar` with a pre-built .jar file. Nothing fancy. Still, I have no idea what it's running, since Docker allows mutable tags, and there's no reference to a version number, let alone a git revision.

> Your comment further pushes me away from Nix, really, even without mentioning it. It makes it seem even more like a tool that’s not for me

I wasn't talking about Nix, I was talking about Docker. They're very different tools (Docker manages running processes/containers; Nix describes the contents of files). I just really hate Docker, and am baffled when people say it's "easy".

> but rather for much more complicated things.

You're giving me too much credit. It took me days to even get Docker installed. It turned out that despite a mountain of documentation telling me to install "Docker Machine", that's actually been discontinued for years and I should have been installing "Docker Desktop" instead.

[1] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonECR/latest/userguide/getti...

[2] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cli/latest/reference/ecr/upload-...
Not the person who you posed the question to, but I believe their point may be that Go is a fully described game, a constrained 'space' even if that space is remarkably deep.

Our world is not a fully described game (unless you want to take a radical philosophical position, and in which case we still don't know the rules of this game). We talk about and think about this world in language. Training a machine on human language and then after training, having that machine take language inputs and generate language outputs is not the same as training a machine to 'play' Go because the two worlds they have been trained in (1. the game of Go; 2. the real world) are fundamentally not equivalent.
Lenin is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of millions of people. You're quoting someone who has a body count higher than that of Adolf Hitler.
First, they'll never have any change when they do this hoping to force you to overpay. Second, they can charge you for the ATM trip and the wait time (and then you have $20 bills, so forced to overpay). Third, if the machine "failed to run it", they can charge the card and pocket the cash.

The article was about some just charging whatever they felt like, but in those cases got too greedy. Since many won't notice, it's hard to dispute, and the DA isn't going to charge them, they can keep doing over and over. Especially with foreigner tourists.
> set a formula for the entire column

Spreadsheet power users on both excel and sheets do exactly that. It’s called array formula. Press cmd-shift-enter on the cell with the formula and it’s valid for the entire column and can be changed in one central place.
That does not feel like advantage unless you can do relational algebra on it all, though. Without that, it's more like dBase and similar languages of that era, where you had to manually juggle tables and cursors. People did UI that way too, but there was a reason why the OOP approach with object graphs and references quickly became dominant once it appeared - it's still a much more natural way to model this.
"They wouldn't have not gone if they didn't not know what they should've not known [sic]"
cap==len is effectively the default - most slicing is done with [start:end], not [start:end:additional-cap]
That is amazing. The example I use for common sense is putting a penny in a jar, and this is even beyond that. It asked it the other day where you can stand and see a waterfall and not get wet and it correctly said a bridge.
The additional context of the previous question may have clued it into the trick. You may want to start a fresh conversation when testing things like this.
Glaze: Protecting artists from A.I. style mimicry
Another idea I just had - the algorithm isn't meaningful without the data. Give someone the code/algo, and they can project whatever they want onto it because there is no actual proof based on the data.

There will be people who replay tweets through the algo, but as we all know - the secondary market of simulation is going to be different than the in-moment reality.

(We also have no reason to trust Musk or believe the code will be complete. He is a well-documented stretcher-of-truth, and likely doesn't understand where all the relevant code lives. After firing 3/4 of the company, it's also likely that nobody at twitter knows this.)
No, all publicly available data or I checked the product label physically for the product. No brands shared info with me.
every time i ring the bloody office they offer to set this up fo rme, and every time i say no because i know its a bullshit way to authenticate.
Successfully for whom? As a user, I find that when a desktop app is using a web stack like Electron, that's one of the best predictors for poor and inconsistent UX.
Hey, I live pretty close to Riverside! Shoot me an email at hello@taylor.town and maybe we can grab coffee sometime
The last time I felt that magic was the BarCamp scene. People would give presentations on whatever they wanted, and it ran more on the fun side of things than the useful knowledge side. But even that was almost 15 years ago now.
I struggle to follow / understand a lot of things in the past.

We get history that understandably is written by the more educated from those times. I really don't know that we know what the local rando citizens thought or were thinking.

Heck even when we get history and information from the people at the time sometimes it is confusing. The English Civil War is completely confusing for me.
It really is but compared to keeping poorly insulated buildings at 70f in the winter or all the forced, unneeded commuting to work it is trivial.
I'm saddened to inform you that no scientific research being done these days holds up to these standards.
I want to see a native service discovery protocol for OCI registries.

HashiCorp uses a service discovery protocol for Terraform: https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/internals/remote-s...

It allows domain owners to use a "pretty" name for their Terraform services (e.g. terraform.ycombinator.com) while pointing to a different host and path (e.g. an S3 bucket).

Decoupling the "root" of a registry from where its API is implemented is a great layer of indirection I wish existed in the container image registry ecosystem without speciaised server software to perform API-aware redirects.
I like this one by “Lazy Boy”

https://youtu.be/9vGwDUcBHbk
"you really don't start seeing things out of nowhere"

If you sit down in a completely dark room on LSD, you really do start seeing things out of nowhere. Or I did at least.

Was it pattern recognition? In a completely dark room? What was I recognizing patterns of?

Was it a distortion? Of what?

Was it real? In the PKD sense of reality, probably not. There seems to be a reluctance to accept the possibility of a hallucination.

I would look down at my legs and there would be snakes crawling up my legs. Then I would realize that those weren't my legs, those were my pants. I had come to accept my clothing as part of "me". And that's when things started to go, I realized that the idea of "me" was arbitrary.

There's no definite boundary of where "me" starts and where "me" ends, those boundaries start to disappear. Maybe "me" isn't my physical body, it's everything I've experienced, everything I've ever seen or felt. Everything I've ever loved or hated. Everything I've ever created or destroyed.

Everything I've ever done or said. Everything I've ever eaten. All that I slight, everyone I fight. All that is now, all that is gone, all that's to come, and everything under the sun is in tune, but the sun is eclipsed by the moon.
This is (arrogant) misanthropy, and I see far too much of it on forums that contain significant numbers of people who consider themselves more 'enlightened' than the common man (reddit being a prominent example).
I think so: I couldn't even save 8192 x 5464 full res examples from the R5 with it: it wouldn't even do 8000, seems to be limited to the "film" 8k resolution which is a bit less.
Google Security Blog: Hardening Firmware Across the Android Ecosystem
> 1. Statefulness: simple example, api call that returns a query from the DB that has a high transaction load

We natively handle API and DB calls.

> 2. Non determinism: for example returns a random number, guid or a time

This is a bit tricky. We run the same test multiple times, and ignore the changing fields.

> 3. Privacy requirements for certifications or legislation that mean private data cannot be used in a test environment.
>
> 4. GDPR laws

We anonymise *any* private data before storing it for replay.

> 5. Authentication

We capture auth headers, and mock auth server responses.

> I presume this is more microservice friendly and monolith unfriendly. But that is probably a reason on the pro side of smaller, bounded services.

Currently yes. APIs can be easily tested. Tests for function calls will require user configuration.
I've thought about that.

While processing, yes - an arena allocator is a better fit. But my data is loaded from disk & held in memory while its manipulated by consumers of my API. Given the lifetime is determined by the caller, there's no obvious arena to allocate from.

I could put the whole thing into a long lived arena - but unless I'm careful, some operations would leak memory.

But it would definitely be better from a performance standpoint. Using smallvec, every time these values are read or written the code needs to check if the value is "spilled" or not. And I think there's a lot of code monomorphization involved too - using a vec in an arena would probably make my binary a fair bit smaller.
This "broad" education can be useful, but not in a vacuum. It would be better if you are a technician, engineer or whatever and you pursue some kind of liberal art education; or say societal/psychological studies; or English studies, etc...

The point is, the real world still needs you to be productive in different things. You'd better have that first, get some real world experience and then expand your career horizontally by getting into these fields. I think the mistake is that some people have been pursuing these career in a vacuum and also took a lot of debt while doing it.

So while they might have had an interesting experience while at college, they are not of much use in the outside world.
> but usually if it asks for a donation at the end, I normally "round up" or donate a dollar.

"it"? what is "it"?
Democracy isn't when only Democrats win either, and yet we have people like Stacy Abrams.

Either way, I find this comparison of ancient Rome to modern politics ridiculous. Just thought I'd slam in here with a jab.
So not only have I studied at a university (a canonically prestigious university FWIW), I have also had the good fortune to work closely with academics and researchers in my career.

I did not exclude other benefits of a university education in my statement, I simply highlighted one of the things that sets it apart from learning in isolation.

How wide a range of subjects one might discover on ones own is arguably broader (although of course not precluded by an academic education either)

I am largely self taught in CS (my degree was in another subject), but that had not prevented me from having multiple patents and having published academically too.

There are many other factors at play, and where and how you are educated is only one of them.
Weak wiki article.