skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Credit Suisse is being sold for 70% lower than its price on Friday. Twitter is worth 13 Credit Suisses lmao.

They’re clearly insolvent without this, no? The Swiss government forced UBS to do this at gunpoint, why else would they do that
Honestly that is a good way to describe a lot of the works by McDonagh.
I like the characterization of chatGPT in this comment in the second link:

> [–]righthandofdog 46 points 2 days ago

Mansplaining as a service is the best description of GPT.

> The reason it CAN be right about more general info is because people trained it away from lies. No one has trained out the lies on more rarified knowledge, so it makes shit up.

> Trusting its answers to be correct is flatly stupid when it is literally designed to make shit up that sounds good instead of saying "I don't know".
Housing prices were going up because of supply/demand and not necessarily because of systemic high inflation.

By the way just with regular <2% YoY inflation, a $1m home in 2005 was worth $1.3m+ in 2019 (before covid and the current inflation spike), and that is with regular inflation.

Because homes cost a lot of money to begin with, the compounding effects of “healthy” inflation is going to be noticeable, and that doesn’t even factor in the low supply in the market.
Yes, it is. What point are you trying to make here? Being a maintainer of open source software does not elevate you above criticism.
Never noticed this, that's fantastic design!
nor rodents
No, though I posted data that shows their claim is at best misleading and not viable:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35225376
They can buy longer duration bonds and sell them before the loan is due or even corporate bonds. Yes, it introduces certain risks, but with the endemic banks irresponsibility constantly bailed out by the government, I will not be surprised. But I guess, possible spreads are a bit too small for this scheme to matter.
Those are the distances flown. Their take off rail was 60 feet total not sure if they noted their take off distance at the time, it's not mentioned in the accounts I've read but they're not super in depth.
You can't just "default on a loan." The Fed would reposes their other assets...
Be careful with this statement, early diagnosis is key to survival for certain conditions. In many cases it has not resulted in improved mortality, prostate cancer being one of them.

This is so well known we have terms to describe the phenomenon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_time_bias
uBlock does not block them. For exmaple, you can go to nike.com with uBlock on and still see these annoying popups.
> The manual basically tells you not to really use it for anything outside of experimentation.

It is probably a smart move to say GPT4 is not suitable for use for anything. People are already letting GPT4 write things that have legal consequence, and I think this is the best defense when faced with a lawsuit:

We told you not to use GPT4 to write your job offer letters and job ads.
> stop freeriding on the degree signal and instead put actual effort into hiring.

90% of why employers do that is that we functionally outlawed intelligence testing of job applicants, so they instead outsource it to an extremely expensive alternative.
Exactly what I always wanted
On the moon, wouldn’t heat be a useful byproduct? (At least during the night) so a combined heat and power station would put those radiators where the people are
You will never be able to train an image model by asking permission from every artist, unless you are Disney and train on every frame of your video library.

In this case, you don't need to do anthing special to work around this tool, just do what everyone is already doing and resize all your training images to a common size, thus defeating Glaze entirely.
> traveling to 20-30 countries a year

No, probably not. Whatever your life circumstances are, they're so ridiculously far outside the norm that almost nothing about your life applies to most people's.
MIT and FBI efforts to stop Chinese, Russian and others spying on campus
Really nice language. Would you mind describing the modules/libraries system? I see you have a Python-style import and I'm curious how you implemented this in a language that compiles to C.
There was an comment yesterday (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35209775) that linked to https://andymatuschak.org/prompts/
Careful, this place can't take a joke, even when it is hilarious.
Last time I worked with aptx directly was in the CSR days, but they used to have a library they'd provide in binary form only for your specific platform and compiler settings. It was fuck-off expensive ($1+/device + certification), so the easier way to do things was just to buy their silicon which had the IP "for free". A couple years back someone put a decoder of dubious legality into FFMPEG [1], though. The code was subsequently migrated into bluez as well.

[1] https://ffmpeg.org/doxygen/trunk/aptx_8c_source.html
You make your own decisions.

However empirically I found that the more convinced one is that they don't need advice the more badly they actually need it.

Objectively, if I was deciding on whether I want to be married or not - I'd want to speak to a lot of old dudes who never married and those who did, and understand their experiences.

And I'd love to have heard from someone who loved single life like I did but found even deeper meaning in marriage.

Doesn't mean I would let them make the decision for me but I would want to know it. And if I was too dumb to ask those questions, I'd hope someone older and wiser would recognize that and help me
More HQLA locked up for x amount of time... what could go wrong...
"The positive central idea is that the human psyche, or soul, really believes in itself, and in nothing else." excerpt from D. H. Lawrence's foreword to "All Things Are Possible" (1905). The title borrows a phrase from The Christian Bible, although Shsetov may have shuffled off some beliefs about dogmatic organized religion.
It really is true - no good deed ever goes unpunished.
I know "QE with extra steps" is a R&M reference, but keep in mind that R&M was wrong, what they described wasn't actually slavery (you can make anything anything else if you squint hard enough and/or remove the critical "extra steps"), and this isn't actually QE (as I, random Internet dweller, understand it anyway).
Fascism means… whatever you want it to mean?
I didn’t mean job positions. I meant their exposure to long term derivatives called swaps. Their positions in relation to stocks.

I see how my comment could be taken either way though!
> Because if Google's appropriation of Oracle's API IP without a license is fair use, what uses of an API would be protected by copyright?

Well, copying the implementing code of the API rather than only the declarations, or copying the declarations for a purpose that was not supporting an implementation for a very different underlying platform constraints could be distinguished on grounds central to the core of the Supreme Court decision. The former would very likely fail Fair Use analysis without some new factor not presebt in Google v. Oracle, the latter is less certain. (And any of the other points of the fair use analysis could be basis for distinction, the analysis is complex and doesn’t boil down to a short, simple rule.)
This would be an extremely strong argument if those artists had learned to draw themselves without looking at a single pre-existing piece of art.
and also I think they meant class-based components -> functional components enabled by hooks
That was my initial reaction as well, but it isn't necessarily true. If you read up on how Windows Hello uses a PIN, then it becomes clear that they can be pretty secure where: (1) a PIN is tied to the device; (2) a PIN is local to the device; and (3) a PIN is backed by hardware.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/identity-...
The epitome of what not to do as far as I'm concerned.

Ads are ok - just don't be sneaky about it, and don't go way of porn - esp full on stuff. In other words vet very carefully before accepting an advertiser on a site.

But a fraction over two years ago zippyshare went mad with porn. If they woke up eventually, it would have been too late, most people I knew who used it on and off, had moved.

I used to send files by way of zippy, no fuss password protected obviously small stuff I wanted to send over - but it became really NSFW and I had to change to another.

Of course it also means people aren't using it to share files to people who may have children in the same room - it really was over the top stuff, not the polite most one would see was naked boobies.
Of course there is. Assuming you're referring to the new Bank Term Funding Program (which this article is not referring to), collateral is only eligible if it was owned before the program began.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/file...
I am making an extreme point. Whatever people's idealized single life is, working in finance/tech in NYC, dating and traveling would be on that list. And I can still articulate why married life is way better for me.
Jira is a beast, like salesforce. It is self-perpetuating. It takes so much effort to configure that there are consulting agencies that specialize in it and charge 6-figure sums to configure your instance… after paying that fee, managers need to cover their asses and keep paying for Jira, because sunk costs.

At a certain point it’s just an abstract spreadsheet with custom rules no one knows how to maintain, and the team ends up praying to the Jira gods like some ancient religion to keep their dev process going.

Anyone who does actually have a handle on it becomes a go-to resource on their team, so they jealously guard their install and never let the company switch try anything else to preserve their status
The woman's face is much less flattering in the original, would say the touchup from getty was pretty dang good.
Study finds higher cancer rates in military pilots, ground crews
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLFairUse

I don't know how small the snippet has to be to be considered fair in court, but it looks like they copied large portion of code.
There isn’t a liquidity crisis. The government debt that triggered all this is highly liquid. The banks have a solvency crisis. Hence the cash giveaway disguised as a lending program.
PCI vendor IDs are quite a bit older than 2014. Likewise for the USB ecosystem. It would not be easy to retrofit cryptographic signing into these systems without breaking a lot of vital functionality or making the security a toothless opt-in system. Verifying the authenticity of every component of the system is only viable when it's a relatively closed system: embedded devices, smartphones, etc. Narrowly-focused authentication systems like HDCP have had some success, but doing that for every peripheral and replaceable component in a PC would be a monumental project.
It was a hilarious movie. It just also happened to be quite sad
I have been using https://streetpass.social/ to find more mastodon users - it uses the ‘verified domains’ thing in mastodon in reverse - you go to a website and if it is verifying a mastodon profile it gives you a link.

I’ve been very surprised how many people and organisations are on the fediverse.
> that you could just ask it the same thing over and over again and it would just make new things up each time

Why is that described as bad or surprising? It doesn't know and so these varrious answers seem about equally likely to it.
> At the start of the 2022-23 academic year, few professors had heard of it.

Few if any, given ChatGPT was announced at the end of November...
Clunky, but hey I'll take it. Thanks!
I know the most about stable diffusion. Stable diffusion (based) models are typically open source, you can download them for free, and they easily fit on a cheap USB stick.

They're not actually supposed to have anyone else's pictures in them as such [1].

As far as I can tell, the training is more along the lines of "this is what a dog looks like", "this is what a cat looks like", "this is what a stick looks like" ... etc.

At this point in time, unaltered output is automatically public domain, because it is not made by a human.

[1] some early bugs notwithstanding.
You're thinking like an engineer.

I'm confident your average person would understand that a PIN is insecure if it was explained to them.

But think about other things in life that use a PIN -- debit cards, customer support shortcuts, etc. These are things that can't or typically won't be brute forced and are deemed as "secure enough" in our world.

Your average person has no idea how a 2FA token is generated, but they know it's just a few numbers that they have to enter on various websites and apps, and those numbers resemble a PIN. Yet another reinforcement that just a few numbers keeps things secure.

If you walk a user through software setup, and at some point they need to provide a complex master password, they would never automatically assume that being presented with an option to use a PIN would remove the security provided by a complex master password.

Only if they were to think it through, or have someone who thinks analytically, would they understand that in this scenario, given that it's Internet-accessible software, a PIN could be brute forced in no time unlike their debit card or any other PIN they may need to use in the course of their day to day life.
So the Fed hikes in order to cause fiscal pain, succeeds, then bails out the international banking cartel with unlimited liquidity secured by bonds under par. Where is the liquidity bailout for single parents who lost their jobs due to Fed hikes? Can they get HELOCs at sweetheart valuations so they can survive the rate hikes, too?

It's abundantly clear to me at this point:

1) Fractional reserve banking is inherently unstable and no amount of regulation or insurance schemes can prevent bank failures. A major rethink of our monetary system is in order: One that keeps credit allocation and money creation in the private sphere without guaranteeing interest rate arbitrage on all new money to a privileged class of authorized Ponzi schemers.

2) The Federal Reserve Bank is merely a creature of its owners: The international banking cartel. It does not serve the people--rather, treats them adversarially--and the mechanisms of accountability that exist are obviously insufficient. However, increasing the political accountability of the Fed will likely result in a failed political monetary policy. We need to re-evaluate whether the Fed is fit for purpose.

3) At the very least, the Fed must be forced to grant charters for narrow banks, be put in public trust rather than continue under private ownership, ban bank employees from staffing Fed positions, and become radically more transparent in virtually every way. Oversight must be reorganized and democratized. The toxic nexus of fractional reserve banksters and their political and governmental enablers must be destroyed.
Have to agree, from study in Taiwan, life in the PRC, Hong Kong, and South Korea over decades: democracy in Taiwan is healthier than that in the U.S.

For the skeptical, check out videos of how ballots are counted in Taiwan. Individual ballots are lifted out on the ballot box, one-by-one, and held up for any and all observers to verify. Compare this to how the matter is typically conducted in the U.S., in near-secrecy behind closed doors, involving convoluted use of a congeries of machines, having closed-source software.

https://youtu.be/rSdbDagWLFQ
Building up my initial knowledge like you describe was the only way I could generate the enthusiasm for working on top of so many layers of abstraction.
Now they need an accord that says nations are required to respect accords.
https://youtu.be/1aVYJ-krSMA?t=5
That doesn’t make sense in the context of this tool.
Fair point, it takes a bit of power user sorcery (and maybe a Pro license for Group Policy) to make Windows behave in that regard.

It's still far less time (read: money) wasted than needing to tinker with Linux, though. Gods know how much of my life I've wasted there...
So you’re talking about the collapse of the wave function.

If I collapse the wave function on one entangled particle, is the other entangled particle collapsed as well?
The example you gave is not specific enough to guess what you are referring to.
Worse than looking for objective treatment of "Conservative values" in a Rupert Murdoch property?
What regulators should have done starting a year ago, and can still do now, is force banks to restore the mark to market value of their equity cushions via share sales.
I assume you are referring to money raised by Churches from their congregations?

If so, you are not following the conversation. We are using preachers to mean those who provide moral/life guidance from their own experience. You can fall that "advocates" or whatever.
Caveat: I did not read the embedded pdfs but I did read the article, and nothing there even alludes to anything like a retention policy.

Even the wording of the accusation does not even imply a policy:

> Like Mr. Pichai, other key Google employees, including those in leadership roles, routinely opted to move from history-on rooms to history-off Chats to hold sensitive conversations, even though they knew they were subject to legal holds

Routinely opted is not a policy. A policy is formal, not an option you routinely take.

I'll wager even the best lawyers will be hard-pressed to prove this routine is primarily to render discovery impossible. In fact, on face value alone it will be hard to objectively prove any purpose to this, unless more info/evidence/data/witnesses come up.

The text that follows my quote

> they did so even when discussing topics they knew were covered by the litigation holds in order to avoid leaving a record that could be produced in litigation.

makes assumptions that you can only speculate on, not prove. Sure, they were discussing topics covered by the litigation and then pivoted to private chat within nine seconds. Does it follow that the part of the conversation they moved off-record (and hence we are not privy to) is also definitely covered by litigation and could affect the outcome of the trial? Not necessarily (although likely, alas courts don't settle for likely).
When it showed the cockpit I was surprised it wasn't Mike Patey. It seems right up his alley!

Then I went to his channel, and it turns out Mike built the plane.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xac5Qhxd4k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXmGoQi670c
Have you tried to measure their performance as specified, rather than deliberately crippled? It doesn't sound like you have any reason to suspect you have counterfeit drives when you already have a simpler explanation.
> LLM stands for Large Language model. Not Language Learning Model.

I'm not sure how I missed that. Good to know. My point still stands: it is the text being modeled, not language.

> It absolutely categorizes those patterns as you can ask it for descriptions of things or request things via descriptions

When you "ask it for descriptions", you are presenting a text prompt (that contains your question) to be merged into the LLM's model. After merging, the LLM presents a continuation. The categories you are talking about are patterns of text. Those patterns are part of the model, and the LLM doesn't know them any more than it knows any other pattern.

The categories I am talking about would be higher-level: a metadata structure of explicitly named patterns. That does not exist. LLMs don't have any notion of "what" a specific text pattern is, or why humans care.

> It does identify the importance to humans.

Again: not it. Humans make that identification. The identification itself, as written in text somewhere in the training corpus, is made available as a pattern to the LLM. The answer you get is a continuation from the content of the model, not some objective thought that the LLM is doing.

> Everything an LLM does may be implicit, but it takes a tiny effort to engineer that implicit capability in to something explicit.

Yes, and that engineering is a collection of human intentions. This changes nothing about the distinction I am making between an LLMs behavior, and the human behavior that was encoded into the text it is modeling.

Most of the engineering is to construct the training corpus itself. Adding "weights" is effectively the same; except the model is being edited directly. None of these efforts change the fundamental structure and behavior that the LLM itself is made of.
Sorry, read the edits, but you’re ignoring the part where union members are contributing to the problem and have provided no explanation of how or why the union members would become part of the solution.

Happy to try to understand, here’s even link to list of the percentage of workers per country that are union workers, though that’s obviously not a global count of the number of union members worldwide as a percentage of world’s population:

https://ilostat.ilo.org/topics/union-membership/
AI will quickly obviate the need for prompt engineering, since it can just mimic the best prompt engineer in the world and interrogate the user about what they really want.
No way, colorectal and lung (even if you're a non-smoker, worse prognosis) are both relatively very common and will kill you quickly.

We're seeing a lot of early presentations in both contributing to the lower screening start by the USPTF, evidence still coming in on lung and what to do.
Right, so off the bat, if you're going into a situation with your generative art model, and you're first thought is, "we're totally going to break through this attempt at someone trying to protect their artwork"....aren't you automatically in the wrong?
> it's simply not healthy for most people to go without any animal products in their diets

That's not true, sorry. https://talkveganto.me/en/facts/suitable-for-all/

> Salmon and tuna also ranked high for efficiency, but only when they were wild-caught.

Do they also account for by-catch? Do they account for the fact that 40+% of marine plastics is fishing nets & equipment? https://www.seaspiracy.org/facts

> most vegans still eat a lot of heavily processed foods, drive cars, fly on planes, have most of their food and consumer goods delivered to them via trucking

There are many things wrong with our society. But I don't agree with you here. Plant-based is one of the best things an individual can do the lower his carbon footprint (together with reduction of driving & air travel).
My brother (c17 maintainer) currently has melanoma.
> and give them to the Fed in exchange for freshly minted money?

Is this not essentially QE?
I think OP meant he was surprised that the family felt a strong enough link to China to identify themselves as Chinese, even across time and distance.
HK's problem isn't exactly "just" freedom. Everything since has been going downhill.
I think the issue here is that the old versions will still have potentially been crawled.
Functionally is doing all the work there and isn’t accurate. Do a study showing it’s related to job performance and you can go hog wild.
> Fair use likely applies to LLMs

Fair use is so radically different from anything else for which there is legal precedent that I wouldn’t put money on either side of a court decision of fair use.

> Its loosely equivalent to an artist drawing inspiration while watching a movie.

It’s loosely analogous to lots of things, on both sides of fair use, but loose analogies are potentially very bad guides for fair use analysis, which often turns on fine distinctions. Clearly, given that LLMs are reproducible in ways human brains during the history of Fair Use have not been, the cases are radically disanalogous when it comes to market impact, which is an explicit factor in Fair Use analysis.
lol if only it were that easy.
[unnecessarily toxic]