skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I have no idea what you’re talking about. That URL only tries to load one piece of JavaScript, htmx, and all it does is unbreak the mobile navigation.

(Aside: this mobile navigation is, incidentally, the worst implementation I have ever encountered: instead of twiddling some classes or such, which would happen instantly, it makes an HTTP request that responds with the new navbar. For me, this means at least half a second’s latency on clicking the button, more if time has passed so that the HTTP connection is no longer open (1.5–2 seconds). It also fails the no-JS test, as the unintercepted form-submit just serves the page with the closed mobile navbar again, not switching out the navbar as I expected it might, and which would have been enough to avoid an unconditional “worst implementation” award. Sorry if you made this and it hurts your feelings, but… ugh, this is just a baffling misapplication of hx-post and naive Tailwind use, and just unconditionally a bad approach.)

Edit: better link which shows what I suppose you probably meant: https://once.getswytch.com/app
I have no idea what that’s supposed to mean
> when someone takes out a loan, a bank doesn't lend out depositors' money. Instead money is "created" by the bank (on behalf of the fed), and the bank needs to pay the fed interest. The bank also needs to pay the loan back by an agreed uppn time (which destroys the money).

Why can't I do that with the central bank directly? Why the rent-seeking middleman?
Demographic modeling plays back tape of wheat evolution
I wonder what would happen with a molecule with this shape, what would happen to a crystal with this configuration?
Every device implements privacy extensions which changes the address every 24 hours. It's no longer based on the MAC and hasn't been for a long time.
The point is that you don't have a right to distribute the software unless you give out source code. However, that doesn't mean that a court can you force you to give out the source code - they are far more likely to force you to stop distribution altogether, and pay damages for whatever occurred.

Whether any company in it's right mind would find it preferable to settle the case by abiding by the terms of the license or not is debatable of course.
John Deere is the 84th largest company on the Fortune 500. It may be below Google or Facebook, but it's still a major player.
Valve supports Steam Deck/Proton that much because they are afraid of being killed by windows locking itself down, it's a live line for them, but not a supper profitable business.

A Steam for iOS & Android might be worth it for Valve, but for Mac it's like not worth the money it costs.

Additionally Apple is one of the main offenders pushing for a lockdown of PC platforms and one of the main lobbyist trying to prevent regulation requiring the possibility of (well working) 3rd party app stores. Which means not only would good Mac support be costly it also is constantly at risk of "defacto" being killed off. (Yes there are currently regulations for requiring 3rd party app stores, but it being theoretical possible and it being practically viable for a business are not the same.)
Based on my experience with the Mac tv app, I’m guessing no powerful people at Apple dog food it… tons of little wierdnesses compared with the AppleTV proper.

(It’s been a long time since iTunes played movies, but it was pretty bloated and weird before they popped TV outta there)
Best article I've ever read regarding DMT and its affects on the human mind:

https://www.waggish.org/2011/benny-shanon-the-antipodes-of-t...
Maybe he bought a replacement board computer and can't get it to run doom. All he needs to own to demand source code is the part that runs the code.

That said, he doesn't make clear what, if any, John Deer hardware he owns. I don't think he's the right person to sue.

However, he could use his influence and audience to help any farmer willing to take on John Deer to get a lawsuit together.
React Has a New Home
A video? This is the better link https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/17/john_deere_sfc_gpl/
with resist fingerprinting enabled in FF, it resets the zoom level i have set on each individual site, so it's just annoying.
> If you are referring to the Minsk agreement, the Kiev government was supposed to stop attacking the Donbas and allow them to be independent within Ukraine. The western Ukrainians continued to shell them and killed over 14,000 citizens. So it was Ukraine who broke the agreement.

Im referring to the Budapest memorandum, where Ukraine gave up thousands of nuclear weapons and their long range strike capability in exchange for security guarantees from multiple states (including Russia). These guarantees were the following.

> Respect the signatory's independence and sovereignty in the existing borders.[7]

> Refrain from the threat or the use of force against the signatory.

> Refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by the signatory of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind.

> Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to the signatory if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used".

> Refrain from the use of nuclear arms against the signatory.

>Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments.[8][9]

This all happened in 1994, Russia violated this agreement when they initially invaded Ukraine in 2014.

So I once again ask, why should Ukraine believe any agreement with Russia will last, when they already had one that had them giving up their nuclear deterrence and Russia just decided one day that it didn't matter?.
If you can produce any view angle you want of an object then can't you use photogrammetry to construct a 3D object?
But this will leave no code completion model from OpenAI directly

ChatGPT model isn’t a direct replacement to Codex. Also I believe code davinci 002 is only recently trained/released.

So moving forward few can compete with Copilot for code completion business by just piggybacking on OpenAI’s API

Someone mentioned GPT4, which currently is so slow and more expensive than cushman. If GitHub is going to swap with GPT4, they probably need to 10x of the charges to their customers (currently 10 dollars)

For some tasks they could do with GPT4 but not the completion business.
> is slow as usual:

It's funny because for anything Chrome deems beneficial to Google they are anything but slow, including shipping APIs that no other browser agreed on.
> Exactly why this was not discovered in our tests and CI jobs before the release we have yet to figure out

Oh, just because the tests can't imagine what the environment on all those hundreds of millions of client machines is :)
Wouldn't it go the other way? Train it on dissident content, so that it's able to detect it and alert the censors so they can send the police to reducate the user?
Marc Andreessen: Why there’s no such thing as Web 2.0
Old Chips, New Glitches: The CGA/CRTC “Phantom” VSync
Yeah, not only the story was really interesting from a technical point of view but the storytelling and the social aspects of his relationship with his SO and their social circle were really enjoyable.

I even chuckled when he got mad and went to the garage to sand stuff (I won't spoil the rest) because of how close to home the entire thing hit.
Can't unsee now: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FrcQsBIaEAAYMmb.jpg
It is more than a big deal and more than just accuracy. It is essentially trust and transparent decision making which is what the AI hype squad doesn't tell us.

It is the reason why there is little to no application of AI models in the most serious of use-cases, especially in high risk environment(s) like transportation, finance, medical systems, legal applications. Even if there are, they are either extremely limited or have to be forced to comply with very strict regulations due to their untrustworthiness. There is a lot of money and lives at risk here if it goes wrong.

Tesla FSD is a great example of this and I guarantee that not many here trust the system to safely drive them without their hands on the wheel, end-to-end every day since it can get confused without explanation as to why it hallucinates. Not even Wall Street trusts AI black-boxes like ChatGPT to use it which also regularly hallucinates its answers [0]. Once again, even if they do use it, is in a very limited non-serious applications.

As you can see, it especially affects 'deep neural networks' in general which is what FSD and ChatGPT use and their black box nature makes their outputs highly suspicious and untrustworthy for anything serious. Hence the influx of 'chatbots', BS generators, etc on the internet.

[0] https://news.bloomberglaw.com/banking-law/wall-street-banks-...
And 2023, most likely this will go down hard. Revenue for streamers has already been down the last months, more than usually around this time of the year. 2021 and 2022, Twitch had a massive growth because of the pandemia, so many working from home and not being able to spend the money on other things like events or travel. This is now over, and their revenue is shrinking.
So few. Im at work right now and I think i've opened at least 15 doors just between my bed and my desk. It was five doors just between my bedroom and my car. (bedroom door, out apartment, into stairwell, out of stairwell, out of building). Then car doors, security gates, building external, internal hallways, into my department, into my section, into my office ... I guess I live in a door-heavy environment.
> either in iTunes or TV.app

You missed out on another flagship video watching app of Apple's - Front Row...
Where's the carrot? Other than beating drivers over the head what is being done to help the situation? Better mass trans, bikes etc? They are doing that stuff right?
The question then is, is it effective marketing? How many sales resulted from this blog post? Zero? A handful? Tens? Hundreds?

I would guess a handful at most.

And I am not saying that to criticise the author. Marketing is genuinely difficult. Hell I even did a marketing campaign with paid ads on Reddit to get more people to use one of my pieces of open source, free of charge, pieces of software and even with a bunch of ad impressions and clicks I can still count the amount of new stars on just a few hands
I've worked close with e-ink before in a past life getting early access to prototypes and pre-release tech, and can confirm that yields ware a huge issue back then holding back progress (I remember they had some really cool shit in the lab that I still haven't seen come to market). It's why progress is so slow. Patents are a moat, like any other tech company does to protect it's IP, investments and hard work, but it's not the main moat.

Making color/advanced e-paper displays for prototypes and concepts that only work in a trade show is not difficult, but making that at scale, with good yields to guarantee great image quality at low refresh power, low cost for your customers to stay interested and good margins for you to stay in business is the impossible part.

Very similar to the challenges of scaling down silicon nodes except you're doing it at your own expense, without the dozens of billions that governments and major companies are pouring in it.

Things will stay as is or will progress very slowly, not because e-ink is some evil corporation abusing the patent sistem to hold back progress, but because e-paper displays are used in this product niche of mostly e-readers and digital signage, which have long upgrade cycles and very low margins, meaning there's too little money to make huge leaps, while all the big money in display tech is going into OLED and micro-LED tech as that's what the consumer market wants and buys at large enough quantities and margins, so that's where the big players like Samsung, LG and BOE will be investing in, instead of in e-paper tech.
OK, that sounds decent. I can see myself doing that.
Humans handle mortality in some rather gross ways.
You may want to look into the... Alternative... Usage of this term.
Fun fact , sperm whale oil was used in car transmissions until the 1970s when it was outlawed by the Endangered Species Act.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sperm_oil#Applications
You can literally smell it in the air, older cars don't have cats to burn everything uncombusted down to CO2+H2O. You can smell it with a modern car for the first few minutes while cat is heating up. You can see it in car shapes, there's a reason why every modern car looks the same — aerodynamics and pedestrian safety make car shapes converge. You can see it in ubiquitous cans of AdBlue on petrol stations, which was not a thing just two decades ago (and still aren't in many developing countries).

Finally, you can see it numbers: https://www.asm-autos.co.uk/workspace/images/yearly-co2-emis...

There is no fundamental reason why all those changes had to happen, it wasn't the market driving them. It was the regulation.
Could the Glass-Steagall Act prevented the 2008 banking crisis?
> when team will grow, you will not be able to be friends with everyone, and those not included will feel that they are treated differently.

I will fix this: the other people will NOTICE that they are being treated differently. It wont be merely feeling and the feeling itself is not the issue. The reality of them being treated differently is what is the issue.

I think that it is possible for leader to be friends with people under. But, you gotta be really careful about not being unfair too much. The moment one makes "be my friend" hiring or other condition, it is clearly not the case.
Keep basic probability in mind. No one is going to have a good answer to every question.

I'm serious about that. Look at other answers suggesting giving everyone a veto. Let's say you give five people time to ask two questions each. Even the best candidates are going to randomly fail because someone will veto them for getting one of their two questions wrong.

Would you be okay hiring the first candidate? If not, plan out what you're okay with.
Out of curiosity, what makes you think interest rates need to go higher to stop inflation? I know that’s the standard response to inflation, but economics is wildly complex. My read on this situation was always that we needed to decrease the feds balance sheet, get some marginal increase in interest rates, and the rest is supply side.
My grandfather gave me a worn copy of ‘The Cuckoo’s Egg’ for our 12+-hour road trip back home after visiting them for the summer when I was in middle school. Fastest ride home ever, and I had nearly finished it by the time we arrived. Had a big influence on my career path. Thanks, Cliff!
That's correct. A good one to to get bloop to answer, here's what I got: https://imgur.com/a/nlx4YRq

To create a response to a user's natural language query, the code follows these steps:
Parse the input query using parse_query(), which internally calls parser::parse_nl() to convert the natural language query into a structured format.

Rephrase the query if necessary, or proceed with the initial query by extracting keywords using get_keywords().
Perform a search for relevant code snippets using search_snippets(), which calls the semantic.search() method to retrieve matching snippets.

If needed, grow the relevant snippet using grow_snippet(), which extends the snippet's surrounding lines while maintaining its token count within a predefined limit.

Construct an AnswerResponse object with the user ID, session ID, query ID, and the snippets obtained.
Convert the AnswerResponse into a webserver::Response and return it to the user.
Please note that this is a simplified explanation of the process. The actual code may have additional checks and logic.

Looking at the response and comparing, the biggest improvement would be crossing the file boundary in the explanation step.
Biden said the depositors money is paid out of the insurance scheme that banks pay into. Investors get a bath naturally.
What I don't understand is why John Deer with their incredibly expensive tractors doesn't just use Windows CE or any other proprietary OS. They can afford it and it's not like Linux development is any easier than Windows development.

Offtopic: is it true what he says about Apple pairing their sleep sensor chip to their security signatures? That would be such a scumbag move.
How is delivery any less impact on traffic from driving your own? It would save on parking space though.
No ISPs don't need to do NAT but you can if you like. You also don't have to do NAT with IPv4 if you only have one device or get a subnet from your ISP. It's just done because we don't have enough v4 addresses.

They can do subnet to customer correlation. The IPv6 is randomly generated by your device if you use SLAAC. But if your ISP is an adversary you have pretty much lost anyway. If they provide you with a router they can see all devices in your network (MAC and hostname) and they could also map certain devices to certain port ranges and sell that too.
It also ignores that you can take out a portion of your pension tax free, and that your marginal tax rate is likely to be lower in retirement.

It also ignores the amount of flexibility and options that you have in terms of picking your provider and your investments.

A bunch of things in the article are outright wrong, others are misleading - it's a bad look for the author to criticise things they understand so poorly.
We can only reach a finite number of galaxies
Alan Kay – Doing with Images Makes Symbols: Communicating with Computers
I’ve had a bicycle as my main mode of transportation for years in a 1M people city.
That’s interesting - what about 4?
> Provide damages of some sort, stop distributing program?

This sounds like the most likely outcome it this is successful.
This comment repeats a fundamental error and misunderstanding: WASM is (currently) not able to be a compilation target for an efficient GC implementation. It lacks features needed to be able to implement GCs reasonably, like memory barriers.

So 1. is out of scope if you don't want a bloated super slow language runtime running on top of WASM (like e.g. Blazor).

The issue is known since the very beginning. Nobody in charge is willing to solve it.

Also 2. is not happening, even it was discussed also since many years.

But that makes actually "sense" form the WASM people's perspective: WASM was never meant to by concurrency to JS in the browser!

WASM is merely a performance booster for where JS sucks (like numerical code).

That WASM will allow to use other languages (and their ecosystems) in the browser is just a day dream of some. The companies behind "the web platform" won't give up on their billions worth of investments into the JS ecosystem.

So no, GC languages other than JS won't ever run "natively" on the browser in a meaningful way. WASM is crippled on purpose in this regard, and as long as the current stack holders continue to control "the web platform" this won't change.
I find Linux development significantly easier due to experience and I think that feeling could be shared by a lot of folks. There’s also value in working with open tools because you can take that knowledge and use it anywhere. If you become knowledgeable in enterprisey stuff you can get stuck doing enterprisey things
That's probably healthier for fruit/veg, but I find myself a weekly shopper. Even for just myself the rucksack guy above you might be pushing the limits.
i don’t get why they did not get rid of the tail, don't most people feel the shape is a bit archaic now?
I wonder if their censorship means that the Chinese corpus has less spam than the rest of the internet? Would be interesting if that turns out to be a huge advantage for making AI.
Looking at the comment section I feel assured that comments are a thing of the past. I wonder if those people would take the hurdle to send an email instead.
I'm confused. What are you on disability for? Surely not for using DMT...
To expand on listening to your gut instinct: I find taking a "trust but verify" approach useful. Take the time to dig into what your instinct is telling you, try to match it up in words to your hiring criteria (which should go beyond technical stuff, including capturing whether or not you'd want to work with the person), and compare against other candidates to check you're being consistent. For instance, you don't want to unfairly penalise someone for being loquacious just because their interview was right before lunch and you were getting hungry, whereas you enjoyed interviewing the similarly talkative candidate that happened to be interviewed just after lunch.
The set of all galaxies is finite, isn’t it?
In many cases, you may want to optimize one of the inputs to achieve the desired outcome. If you think of classic linear regression, you get a rough approximation of how each input affects the output. So, for example, if you built a linear regression model on house pricing, you could be relatively confident that an X increase in number of bedrooms, or proximity to public transport, or some other variable, has a direct affect on your output Y (home price). And in the case of linear regression, you get weights and power for each coefficient, so as a builder you can say "I'm going to build houses closer to the metro to fetch a higher price". Greatly simplified, but I think this is is what is missing from AI. If we're having AI classifying things, it's only one piece of the puzzle to actually do the work of classifying (and that's useful to a lot of people). But the other half of the equation is to explain why things are classified the way they are.
Brings to mind the Blade Runner enhance scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHwjceFcF2Q
Thinking CBDCs are “safe” is extremely naive. They’re a dystopian nightmare. They’re every dictators wet dream. This is why Bitcoin matters. Bitcoin = freedom.
i wonder how a population might be scared into acting illogically to the point of their own demise
The judge would not order to release the code, but John Deere could likely avoid paying (most of) the fine it they instead decided to release the source code.
Sheldon was "forgotten" because Harris filled his site with ads after he died, caused the site to get off the first page of results. The irony is that the community would almost certainly have supported and paid for the site if they had made an appeal.

frets.com is a good one for all things related to the maintenance and repair of fretted instruments.
When I lived in a condo with a shopping center ten minute walk away I still found myself driving it. Sometimes I carried stuff back but it felt like it was more of getting some exercise rather than convenience.
Beta doesn't mean improving, it means not ready for production and with limited or no guarantees.
Yes, I've found it increasingly frustrating after managing a university central HPC system with rpms. (It's a myth that you can't support different versions with rpm or dpkg if necessary.) I was at least convinced of the need for an actual package manager -- i.e. not Easybuild that everyone else favoured -- after the hell of people's environment modules installations and combinatorial explosions.

For instance, several times I've had Spack in a state where it had obscure apparently internal errors that I didn't have the energy to try to diagnose, which resulted in throwing everything away and starting again. I found build recipes frequently don't actually work, especially if you're not on x86_64, though architecture accounts for a minority of the failures. You also end up quickly running out of space in ~10GB of home directory, at least if things aren't shared on the system.

There is a tension between "reproducible" static configurations and the dynamics you need, e.g. to be able to link instrumentation or acceleration libraries at run time. However, there is a Spack option to use RUNPATH instead of RPATH that I'd have to look up.
Eucalypt forests naturally limit bushfires if they're allowed to mature
“The most scarily/stunningly impressive linguistic feat I’ve ever seen“