I asked GPT-4 to produce a simulated argument about Electron which devolves into name calling. Here's the 2 page of result it returned:

User1: Hey, have you heard about Electron? It's an awesome framework for creating cross-platform apps using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

User2: Yeah, I've heard of it. But I think it has some pretty serious shortcomings. Like, it's notorious for consuming a lot of system resources, which can be a major drawback for certain applications.

User1: Well, I think that's an acceptable trade-off for the ease of development and the ability to create one codebase that works across different platforms. Plus, it's backed by a large community, which is always a plus.

User2: Sure, but you can't ignore the fact that it increases the app's size significantly. Even a simple Electron app has a huge size compared to native apps, making it a poor choice for users with limited storage or slow internet connections.

User1: The size issue can be managed with optimization techniques, and honestly, storage is becoming cheaper and more abundant these days. You're blowing it out of proportion.

User2: It's not just about storage. Electron apps tend to have worse performance than native apps because they run on a separate instance of Chromium for each app. That's just bad design!

User1: Look, no framework is perfect, but Electron provides a valuable solution for developers who don't want to learn multiple programming languages and platforms. It's about practicality and productivity.

User2: Practicality? You call it practical to have apps that drain your battery life and hog system resources? I'd rather invest the time in learning native development than creating a subpar user experience.

User1: You're really not giving Electron enough credit here. It's widely used by popular apps like Slack, Visual Studio Code, and Discord! They can't be all that bad.

User2: Just because some popular apps use it doesn't mean it's a good choice. They're actually prime examples of how Electron can lead to bloated and resource-hungry applications. Have you ever noticed how sluggish those apps can be at times?

User1: Oh, come on! You're just nitpicking now. The benefits of Electron far outweigh its drawbacks for most developers and applications.

User2: I'm not nitpicking. I'm pointing out legitimate concerns. If Electron keeps getting a free pass, we'll end up with a sea of bloated, resource-hungry applications, dragging down our devices.

User1: You're just being a native app elitist! Electron has democratized app development, making it more accessible for web developers. It's better to have more apps available, even if they're not perfect, than to have a limited selection because of high barriers to entry.

User2: You Electron fanatics never cease to amaze me. It's like you're blind to its glaring problems. You want everyone to just ignore the elephant in the room!

User1: And you native app snobs are so quick to dismiss any alternative solution that threatens your precious, exclusive club! Get off your high horse!

User2: At least my "exclusive club" doesn't promote lazy development practices and drag down user experience! Enjoy your bloated apps, you Electron zealot!

User1: Have fun in your walled garden, you insufferable native app purist!