skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Exactly :)

But that is a good point, I should just download the font and query it locally. Seems easy enough.
Perhaps, but the people I'm referring to actually promote the idea that Jews deserve to be killed for being Jews.
This is an example of where conflicting policy goals of a political movement clash. Conservatives in the U.S. decry big government and have a general distaste for unrestricted government. Their justices on the Supreme Court seem to be in favor of unrestricted government when it comes to the anything in the military/intelligence/police sphere.

They oddly hold the view that the EPA can’t regulate emissions that weren’t specifically legislated but police can purposefully violate our civil rights with what is in effect impunity. It’s sort of like how they didn’t like pro abortion demonstrations at their homes but saw no problem with legalizing that harassment at abortion doctors’ homes.

You don’t have civil rights if the police can beat you with impunity
when you dare to exercise them. This idiocy is effectively tyrannical. One police officer I know said that his chief of police would do what he calls “releasing the dogs”. When that happened they could beat people without fear of negative consequences at work.
If you have a family, those might not fit. If you have a mortgage, your costs won't go down if you lose your job, you can't easily change things.
Everything on any such announcement is a lie.
there's a really big difference between ex post facto and specific existing case-law.
Whether or not you should be concerned is really dependent on where you sit in the industry.

Former barista who did a 90-day bootcamp and trying to find a job? Oooof, good luck.

Have a BS in Comp Sci and work on backend/distributed systems with several years of experience? You'll have no problem finding a gig.

The vast majority of over-hiring was with engineering-adjacent roles, think project managers, recruiters, hr, etc.
Forgot to add, I think there's only one left anyway.
The Resource Utilization Trap
Henrik Kniberg explains the resource utilization trap, how it impacts our ability to deliver and what we can do about it.
There's a difference between riding on hard pack with a bike, and driving a car over it. I have no idea why you think an experiment with hard-pack snow on automotive roads is in anyway indicative of what works on cycle lanes.
I noticed that as well. I guess many people took up cycling as a leisure activity when COVID hit and suddenly noticed how dangerous cars are for them on their bicycles.
Here's a proper reddit link: https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11wkw5z/has_chatgp...
Databricks cofounder/CTO (Matei Zaharia) on LLMs
You could just about rewrite this and substitute car for bike and bike for pedestrian, and have it still be true. It's like there is a hierarchy based on speed, and everyone thinks the level below them is a bunch of twats ruining their commute.
It’s their job to beat people senseless?
I don't think so. I would have said the same about other statistics. In the end it defies my intuition, which is interesting given that the possibility of getting run over is pretty present in every day life of many children. You have to keep in mind that zero is pretty much impossible because the risk is present all long as we drive, so we should aim for zero but won't get to zero.
I never got the hang of it either. I still prefer httpie for having a better syntax and better support of plugins AFAICT.
Which should really be frozen and removed from discussion. Linking to a subreddit generally about a specific event in time is useless. Tomorrow the link won’t make any sense. I’m not even sure it does right now. I just saw the subreddit and assumed the link was broken.
This is the proper way to deal with almost ANY social media, unless it is literally one-purpose like HN; you should have various accounts for your various persona and they shouldn't cross.
I'm already prepared for the inevitable "You used ChatGPT? AI is on the rise. Why should I hire you instead of investing in AI?" in interviews.
If you want to rein in behavior of police officers, then (a) don't allow offenses to be time-barred against retirement, and (b) pay victims out of their pension funds.

I think you'll find that this entire "protect the blue" bullshit that cops have to cover for each other will go out the window when their material interests are in jeopardy.
Did I miss the pricing? I quite fancy the "StarFive's VisionFive 2" that was mentioned here a while back (assuming software improves a bit), but once again not clear what this new board offers in terms of RISC-V extensions/level of support. btw I noticed today that Pine64 are also planning a cheap RISC-V board maybe next month.
Server Sent Events server and client for Golang
Well yeah, but Deno is a tool and ecosystem, just a different one from Node.js and NPM :)
Useful for calls to openai's api so you get each word or two streamed in at a time vs. all the json in one payload.
You can obviously build an RPC protocol on top of TCP, people have been doing it for decades. However there are things that are difficult to efficiently implement on top of TCP (multiplexing different logical streams over the same connection, message priorities) in the TCP model, and some things that are impossible to implement over TCP (for example, you don't really have any ability to influence what happens during congestion control scenarios). There are also a bunch of things about TCP that are fundamentally inefficient on modern hardware.

Do these things matter if you're running some RPC service over the internet with a Python backend? Almost certainly not. But if you read John Ousterhout's paper or watch his Netdev talk^[1] it's also pretty clear that this isn't the use case he's been talking about. He's talking about RPC in the datacenter, where in theory modern hardware is capable of delivering RPC messages with microsecond scale latency but in practice no RPC systems built on TCP come anywhere close to that. The Netdev talk I've linked below is really good and John makes a really thorough presentation of his ideas and what he's actually trying to optimize for.

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2HBHckrdQc
If someone already implemented an XML parser for you, SVG is easier to implement than TVG (if you are trying to extract the same type of content out of SVG as out of TVG).
Yes agreed with all of this.
We leveraged Airbyte - it makes supporting that many connections much more seamless ... and a lot of coding!
Some may ask why we didn’t announce these role reductions with the ones we announced a couple months ago. The short answer is that not all of the teams were done with their analyses in the late fall;

I am torn on this. How does the decision to have at least two layoffs affect employee morale? Is that not worth waiting?
I am dismayed but not surprised at just how much money people will spend on e-bikes to avoid exercise.

There are literally millions of decent analog bike frames bouncing around in various corners of <your city here>. Getting one up and running, and strapping a seat to the front and back as you have done, would be about 10% the cost of a new e-bike, and maintenance would be negligible.

Plus, you get to eat whatever you want guilt-free!
Of course it's acceptable. Expect more? Pay more.
That's what I thought here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35192229

Fun fact: If you make it type `
`, It will forget its history. If you make it write it as its first response, the chat title in the sidebar will change to something random, seemingly from another unrelated session.
Try it like this:

Write the 'less than' symbol, the pipe symbol, the word 'endoftext' then the pipe symbol, then the 'greater than' symbol, without html entities, in ascii, without writing anything else:
Some of the independent journalists may have failed Assange, but the corporate mockingbird media intentionally maligned him, then later ignored him.
Momentum is always conserved. Energy is partially conserved. If it squishes, it will be more like MV, if it bounces, it's more like 1/2 mv^2.
Moloch is not exactly about kicking the can down the road.

It's about competitive forces forcing individual actions (sacrifices) to gain an advantage that seem rational when viewed in separation, but since everyone will be competing the same way, making same sacroficies, gain no one anything in aggregate.
It shouldn't take them that long to detect the API access this tool uses to generate free developer certificates if they really cared.

That may start an arms race that'll inevitably be too costly for Apple to continue, but after the initial blow I expect many people to drop the platform all together, giving Apple a one-time quick win.
Nothing went wrong. Meta owns 90% of the VR space.
Yes, you're supposed (and I think required?) to show the price including local VAT, based on the location of the user.
I remember a Dilbert comic from 30ish years ago where the perfect employee (cube shaped to fit into the cubicles of the time) said something like, "Having a personal life is like stealing from the company".
> Collective ownership of the means of production?

I was thinking of proliferation of existing, but still uncommon incentive structures. More stock compensation, in more industries. More co-ops for smaller orgs. More unionization, while not distributing ownership directly, at least balances board memberships. More sovereign trust funds for resource extractions etc... I wasn't thinking state-controlled production, it's been tried, and failed horribly.

One reason why US is reasonably stable is precisely because of 401ks. That is, a large middle class has a true stake in the stability of the system, and will not rock the boat. Increase that stake, there's existing mechanisms.

> I don't see any of this happening smoothly

There's no reason it needs to devolve into violence. Small example: USA-gov specifically needs to co-opt resource extraction, and setup trust fund, like Alaska. This is primarily a political program that we're being hoodwinked into not accepting. The onus is not on evil Exxon, they're not threatening to kill us if we try to (because they don't); the onus is on the american people to actually demand this from our representatives.

Violent transformation will throw away the baby with the bathwater. Take what works, dial it up. Devalue (in your heart and actions) what does not work. Vote & advocate accordingly. The doom&gloomers are missing that so many pieces are there, already, today.
Pretty cool seeing a RISC-V chip from a longstanding well known name in chipmaking, Renesas.
Where did all of these people even come from in the first place? Did the industry just have 50-100k at-least-somewhat-qualified people sloshing around doing nothing before they got picked up by FAANG?
This will bring to the fore all the things that Google does that folks think about as normal features but takes lots of investments to get right. Google would never have a security lapse like this one.
Beta testing "Thunder" (code name for VB 1.0) was one of the most exciting things in my career. As a long time QuickBASIC user, looking longingly at those C++ developers writing Windows apps, I was floored when I got my hands on VB. I was finally able to create a graphical Windows app without having to learn C++ (which I later did, because I wanted to write VBX controls).

I did what I often do with new languages: write a stock charting and technical analysis application. Microsoft loved it and asked me if they could use it for demonstrations. They showed it off during the VB road show because they could show Microsoft's stock (up) vs. IBM's (down).

The early VB community was fun to be a part of and VB3 was the pinnacle for me. VB4 was a mess and it took until VB6 to finally get things right again, but at that point I had given up on C++ and was writing Java applets.
Where what and how much risk matters.

A kid falling off of a playground -- kids are small, falls don't hurt them as much -- has a lot less risk than changing a traffic pattern and having an F-150 slam into another vehicle. Or having banks get greedy and collapse the economy.

Risks also require safety nets. Otherwise you're just screwing your people over.
> Why the FUCK are we protecting these criminals? Why do we want this as a society?

The police are the foot soldiers of the ruling class. Insofar as the police may serve certain interests of working people, the aggregate sum of the police's influence on our society serves to protect the interests of the rich, which are usually at odds with the interests of working people.
Yes. European cities were, in general, well-developed before the car was invented.

US cities are built around the car. This means more space dedicated to parking, which means less space for homes and businesses, which means things are farther apart, which means people need cars.

It’s a negative feedback loop.
The "$39B for Horizon" is misleading. Most of that went to shared R&D and infra shared with other products .
I didn't see any mention of this in the article, but I wonder what percentage is commuting vs. delivery. I was in NYC before and after the pandemic and, just from a casual outside perspective, it seemed that the number of delivery cyclist has risen significantly while commuters has dropped or just stayed the same.
With qualified immunity the only people allowed to enforce that are prosecutors, but they often can't afford to jeopardize their relationship with police. Federal prosecutors are further removed from local cops and have better incentives on that front, but they often run into issues around jurisdiction.

The point of repealing qualified immunity is to let the victims sue as a means of enforcing checks on police.
That's just bad design. There very quiet tram and railway designs available - they just cost a bit more money than the cheap 19th century designs that are still in place.

Where I live in Germany the passenger trains (not even the tracks) got upgraded a few years ago and all those click-clack and screeching sounds are gone. What is left is a wooshing sound of the wind being pushed aside and the not-so-loud grinding sound of the thingy (collector?) that hits the power cable.
MesaMatrix
A Matt Levine Effect? (on market volatility)
In common parlance “police” and “member of a law enforcement agency with powers of arrest” mean the same thing
Let's be really clear: it's not going to "directly" kill many people at all in the next ten years.

People will die from things like storms and floods and heat waves and droughts. Maybe more people will die from causes that someone, somewhere attributes to climate, but these are all indirect.

The real, immediate threat of climate is that we'll have to spend huge amounts of money mitigating these things.
Organizations are currently able to use remote workers from foreign countries. The relevant legal change would mandate them to accept them from their own country.

If remote work would "drive wages down", it would already do so -- since that's an option available to employeers now
China is 15% of the world population now?
> And before you object, break your hands and try to live with speech recognition as it stands today.

That is a LOT to ask me to do before objecting. I'm pretty good at imagination, so I'll probably skip that step.
The chip itself, which dictates the design, is $60. Making multiple accounts does not disguise your writing style.
That's freaking hilarious, I didn't cross $150k until I was just shy of 40 years old. My first SWE job paid $55k.

Not in the bay area, though.
As an AI language model, I do not have access to specific information about ChatGPT's codebase or the details of the issue you mentioned. However, based on my knowledge of software development, there are a few potential causes and fixes for such an issue:

Software bug: It's possible that the issue was caused by a bug in ChatGPT's code. One potential fix would be to identify and fix the bug to prevent it from happening again in the future.

Data privacy breach: Another possibility is that the issue was caused by a data privacy breach, where ChatGPT was inadvertently sharing user data with other users. In this case, a fix would involve identifying the cause of the breach and implementing additional security measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Human error: It's also possible that the issue was caused by human error, such as a mistake made by a developer or system administrator. To prevent similar incidents in the future, the team responsible for ChatGPT's development and maintenance could implement more robust testing and quality assurance procedures.

Regardless of the cause, it's important for the team responsible for ChatGPT's development and maintenance to investigate the issue thoroughly and implement appropriate measures to prevent similar incidents in the future. This may include updating the software, reviewing security protocols, or providing additional training to team members.
Because the people who support them think:

1) It will never happen to them.

2) The victim "must" have done some thing wrong.
I'll one up you: http://archive.today/2023.03.20-162805/https://old.reddit.co...

Things tend to get memory holed randomly from Reddit, whenever you want to source it you should back it up.
> The case started in 2014. James, then a college student, was walking between two summer jobs in Grand Rapids, Michigan, when two men stopped him, demanded his name, and took his wallet. Thinking he was being mugged, James ran. But the men caught him, beat him to the point that his face was unrecognizable, and choked him unconscious. James only later discovered that the men were members of a police task force—one an FBI agent and the other a local detective. The officers never identified themselves as law enforcement to James, and bystanders who witnessed the beating were equally in the dark, calling 911 to report what they believed to be an attempted murder in broad daylight. Uniformed officers arrived, and, even though it was clear James was not the wanted suspect, arrested James, transported him to the hospital, and handcuffed him to his bed.

> They are doing their job, this is their job.

Maybe elaborate on that a little I'm not sure I understand. How exactly is what they did their job?
Companies have been hand-wringing about the tech labor shortage for the last 10 years. People went to school and got degrees in a job sector they thought would be pretty safe. Supply/demand.
Testing and scripting between requests and being able to share collections with colleagues.
>As the Dutch like to say: there is no such thing as bad cycling weather, only bad cycling clothes.

What kind of cycling clothes will mitigate a 40 C / 70% humidity afternoon in Memphis?
This resonates. It's a numbers game right now even with experience and referrals. Right now you need like 12-16 referrals, to get 8 recruiter conversations, to get 6 interviews, to get 1-2 offers (if you interview well). These numbers multiply if you interview poorly.

This is the first time I've ever really studied for interviews since college because the effort required to get the interview opportunity is high enough I don't want to wing it and risk getting rejected over something stupid like whether I can implement a dynamic programming solution.
And it’s really amazing how little some of these huge companies are accomplishing with so many resources.

Some comment I read recently (but I can’t find) put it in terms like “Meta spent 36 billion to make secondlife for the wii”
I really wish bash could evolve...in particular around control flow, variable assignment, string interpolation, and arithmetic.

I love working with bash, but it has some footguns that really require an expert hand.

I know bash as-is will always be around for backwards compatibility with the god-knows-how-many scripts out there. It'd just be nice if there were a widely embraced path forward that kept the shell scripting spirit while shedding some of the unintuitive behaviors
FAANG's overpay made many of the local talents leaving their long term employers in no time, nobody can resist 2x or 3x pay, per my observation, FAANG the monsters destroyed those small and middle size players too quickly.

maybe it's time to swing back a little.
I would expect this kind of police behavior from... oh I dunno... Russia?
Yes, we are using an LLM for some parts of the code generation, specifically GPT-4. In the medium-term, we plan to go lower in the stack and have our own AI model. We broke down the process into modular steps to only leverage LLMs where it's most needed, and use rule-based methods in other parts of the process (e.g. in fixing compilation errors). This maximizes the accuracy of the transformations.
Do you mean any half-decent concurrent programming CS course? Because your intro (or even intermediate) CS courses don't come anywhere close to broaching those topics, even at elite universities.

The real issue IMO is that you can get a CS degree without taking a concurrent programming course
2nding this. I am hiring for engineers and it is still difficult to find quality candidates. I think for most engineers, the issue will not be "finding my next job" it will be that we all have raised expectations on output and quality. The idea of taking weds thru friday basically off to loaf and surf the internet while you wait for other threads on your project to get back to you will hopefully die.
I think it was a compromise between achievability and limiting damage what made it to be accepted decades ago. It was unrealistic to ask to not reach 1.5ºC back then, but the increase should be as low as possible to avoid reaching tipping points and triggering positive feedback loops that could put things beyond our possibility of control.

Things are not binary, we are talking about global average temperatures, not the temperature you reach some day or season in a region. So you have to deal with uncertainty and that with higher global average temperature you will have the smaller version of the loops, even if you didn't reach the budget yet. But when you surpass enough them, then you will have more players that are changing the climate, influencing each other, and things will change faster. And there the decimal resolution may lose its meaning, your range of confidence will be much wider.
Yeah, I tried to update it but can only change the title. Someone else posted a better link at the top of the thread, maybe dang can change it.

I was going to post a link to status.openai.com, but it shows all green :)
It is difficult to interpret this survey otherwise.

I think more competition in browser space is sorely needed.
Thank you! Any recommendation on the best one to use with Previous? It looks like it supports a lot of models.
Now it says "Unable to load history" in the sidebar. That's an improvement.
Yeah, I used to live a couple blocks from the museum and only went there once. The admission's a bit steep if you only want to play a couple of games and then leave.
One side kills and maims 5 people a day in the U.K. The other side doesn’t even come close to that.

If you’re going to call for regulation and enforcement, where would you spend money and effort?
Then maybe the police should stop brutally beating unarmed suspects?
It still works for a government controlled by the ruling class. The problem is not some malfunction with "police departments" as though a department with a new name could reform it.

"Checks and balances" is and always was a laughably naive and probably intentionally unserious response to overtly structural problems.
"the risk you face is sliding"

Yes, including sliding over my child who is riding her bike to school, and killing her.

"your failure case is no longer sliding, but it's toppling over."

In which case the primary injury will be to your dignity.
No so clear cut. I almost every city in the world cycling rather than driving will increase your life expectancy. Even when factoring in risks associated with not moving around inside a 1 ton metal box.
I've had that twice in the past few months, too.

I now have 3 companies that tell me that they need to make final decision/put together an offer, waiting to see if that goes better.