skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I asked chatgpt, which has mastered the art of repeating the question back as an answer, sometimes adding prevarications and embelishments.

---

The use of stem cells from one species to produce characteristics of another species in mice raises ethical concerns. The creation of "deer-like" features in mice for scientific purposes is considered unethical by some people because it involves the manipulation of the genetic makeup of animals for the sole purpose of experimentation.

Some may argue that such research is unethical because it does not consider the potential risks to animal welfare and may lead to the development of unnecessary and even harmful procedures for animals. It may also be seen as a form of cruelty to animals, as it involves genetic manipulation that can result in physical abnormalities or other unintended consequences.

On the other hand, proponents of this research may argue that it can provide valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms of animal development and evolution. Furthermore, such research may lead to advancements in regenerative medicine and the treatment of diseases.

If future research is to be conducted in this area, it must be done ethically and with proper oversight. It is essential to ensure that animal welfare is taken into account and that the research is conducted in a way that minimizes harm to the animals involved.

Benefits of further research in this area may include a better understanding of animal development and evolution, and the potential development of new medical treatments. However, the drawbacks of such research include the potential for harm to animal welfare and ethical considerations regarding the manipulation of animal genetics.

In conclusion, the ethical implications of using stem cells from one species to create characteristics of another species in mice must be carefully considered before any future research is conducted. If further research is to be conducted, it must be done ethically and with proper oversight, taking into account the potential benefits and drawbacks of the research.
From a different set of essays titled How To Be A Programmer ( https://github.com/braydie/HowToBeAProgrammer ) - How to Conduct Experiments https://github.com/braydie/HowToBeAProgrammer/blob/master/en...

The entire set is good and I occasionally go back and revisit them.
I have been finding that some medical guidance - specially with raising children - are standardized and assuming an almost total lack of judgment on people side.

If you guidelines assume a total lack of criteria from parents it's best to give strict guidance on "no this and that until XYZ".

Example: where I'm raising my kids it is standard medical guidance to avoid minced meat until 5yo because of HUS - a guidance that no one from where I grew up even today ever heard of. Now, Am I living in a place where the risk of catching HUS is higher? Maybe. But more likely is the fact that here it is easier to just tell people that ANY minced meat is a risk instead of explaining that it depends on how you prepare and cook it.
I'm still waiting for preact.js + htmx.org mashup. It probably exists somewhere, maybe https://docs.astro.build/en/concepts/islands/ or something.

I just want a quick way to throw some react hooks or web components into a dom element using a library that is less than 1,000 lines of code.
Culture matters too. Americans want different things than Europeans and Japanese people. We see this in most areas of life and it's not always because of marketing.

There are also an increasing number of SUVs and automatic transmission vehicles on European roads compared to a decade or two ago...
I thought MacOS was built off of BSD. Wouldn't that make it to where you can run most of the common Unix commands and stuff like Awk?
I would typically save the result of calling debounce (once), then call that, rather than calling debounce over and over on the same inline function (hooks style).

My debounce implementation would *not* be trying to catter to some API that looks like this:

render() {
debounce(() => {
justCallCodeHere(); moreLines();
})

debounce(() => {
anotherFunction(); moreLines();
})
}

but more something like this

constructor() {
// called only once
this.debouncedFn1 = debounce(() => { justCallCodeHere(); moreLines(); })
this.debouncedFn2 = debounce(() => { anotherFunction(); moreLines(); })
}

render() {
// use the created debounced functions
this.debouncedFn1()
this.debouncedFn2()
}

How would you implement the first version without having access to react hooks? Keep in mind that in every call to debounce, the function object you get as an argument is unique because unique closures get created on every call of render().

I hope that illustrates the key weirdness aspect of hooks.
who cares about what words meant in the 1930s? especially considering the modern abuse of language as a rhetorical device.
You're the first person who seemed to think a comparison to the total US domestic market was relevant. The question was whether people "need" AWD. We're just providing examples. We're not even claiming it's an exhaustive list.
One thing that people don't really undestand about the Dutch is that they don't drive small cars by choice. It's by design. Insanely high taxes.

Now let me tell you, I've driven a LOT in Germany & Austria, and I've been stuck behind many Dutch pulling their caravans in their tiny cars that don't make it up to 55mph. So then semi trucks start to pass.

It's hell. I wish they had more horsepower.
HN definitely counts
If it would help me to postpone old age by 200 years, I would gladly accept antlers. It's just bone, so I could always just saw them off if they get in the way
I'd say this is documentation organization "debt" – there's a bunch of "advanced" features that aren't that advanced. We're aware and fixing with the new docs -> https://beta.nextjs.org/
https://archive.is/LIBPA
I write about cryptography on my furry blog. I work in cryptography. You'd think I have a funny story to accompany the juxtaposition of these facts, but no.

Unlike many other HN users in this thread, I've never directly benefited from my blog. But I have used my blog to help other people (many of them furries) get into the tech industry. So I'd argue that counts for something.

(I wrote a series called Furward Momentum if you're curious how.)

The main reason why I don't benefit from my blog is because I don't want to. I write for my own amusement, because I enjoy writing.

I occasionally have to turn down the bold recruiter, and frequently get harassed by people looking to pay for a product endorsement or "guest post". (I've asked them for writing samples "in my style" and rejected them for not putting enough furries in it, but that joke loses novelty fast.)
Then I wrote an article about your talk at OSCON (published on The New Stack).

https://thenewstack.io/javascripts-history-and-how-it-led-to...

You discussed how the diff algorithm improved from O(n^3) to O(n). I'll never forget that talk.
being cheap and available is a rather good addition.

I'd definitely want the 256 gib version for my OS, if it was in stock.

Since they are apparently so common, can you point me to a solution that gives me 7 GiB/s transfer rate for around that same price?
Appears they raised over million back in 2012:

https://google.com/search?q=zapier+funding+million
Survival Time – (SANS Internet Storm Center)
Rippling raises $500M in emergency funds after SVB fails
Someone ported the G1 collector to JikesRVM [1], a research Java VM. It's not a production case-study of course, but interesting nonetheless.

[1]: https://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~steveb/pubs/papers/g1-vee-202...
I want to click _more_ on this. Have you set out this view at length elsewhere? What is the metagame openai is playing? Who are they competing with (Google?? FB?), and are the stakes higher than simply making more money? Also - there is presumably not going to be a huge moat to these LLMs so why would being first mover convey outsize advantage? It's genuinely a fascinating way of thinking about it but feel like it needs to be fleshed out a lot more. Also, the full implications 5, 10 years into the future are still very cloudy to me.
> 2) Headlight elevation blinds other drivers, especially those in shorter vehicles. If you're being blinded from behind at night, you have to slow down to let them pass, or else your mirrors become useless or even actively dangerous to look at.

Being blinded by headlights is a problem for me, but getting blinded from behind is a side issue. The big problem is getting blinded from ahead by oncoming traffic going the other way. This isn't a matter of the lights being mounted too high either. They're either aimed too high or they're just ridiculously bright.

I don't understand why cars are getting made this way.
If you roll your own with a bundler, you will also need to integrate a router. Next.js is providing a routing layer for you. If you want to stick with a static/SPA the entire time, that's fine. You don't have to use SSR unless you need it.

https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/static-html-export
It'll become a standard option in CCTV and as an extension a tool for overly authoritive bosses.

"the employee is talking to X, the employee is working, the employee is going to the toilet"
YouTube TV Launches Multiview in Time for March Madness
you sound like an intellectually dishonest person who will resort to any rhetorical nonsense in order to gain social media points, likely narcissistic traits
Personally speaking, I would pretend what ever I had to in order to get back to work that I find interesting.

I don’t think they owe a moral stand to anyone.
https://images.interestingengineering.com/2023/03/13/image/j...
That's an early April 1st joke, y'all.
So true!

> I've built this system at many companies myself.

Interesting! Would I know any of those companies/products?
Thanks coderintherye, all very good points.

If I'm not mistaken Evernote had tens of millions of users.

I'd assume a note-taking app with a better UX has the potential to have at least the same ballpark. I think Evernote's mistake was raising too much money and not differentiating the product from competition...

That said, I really have no idea about conversion and monetization of such an app, because I couldn't find anything comparable.

Compared to Evernote, Remindful doesn't require you to manage your notes, can store complete documents and articles and answer questions about any part of the content.

Moreover, it would be able to actually remind you about important dates and things.

So far people I've spoken to said they need something like this, but at the moment the MVP is not quite ready to be able to charge for it...
Going too far in the other direction can be pretty annoying, too, though.

I'm autistic and vehemently ignore and reject most pieces of news, especially political, and that causes tons of terrible things to happen whenever some sort of spoiler gets out and I happen to see it.

It's like I'm proud of my great ignorance and having that threatened with mere knowledge sends me into a panic of some sort.

It's not just news. If I say "I don't know what that is lol" to someone, 9 times out of 10 their default response to tell me what it is (if it is some cultural/media thing) is the complete opposite of what I want, which is usually just for the other person to move on without telling.

Knowing things can't be undone, so I strive not to know most things, apparently.
Credit Suisse should definitely be bankrupt. Every major banking scandal over the last decade has happened there. Absolutely zero internal controls and zero risk management, it's absurd they've lasted this long.
Edit: OK, I've calmed down. It might not be worth reading what's below this paragraph. The TL;DR is: The cost of helping people is high, it takes time and energy from you. There are people who don't care about your time and energy, they'll use you as much as possible. These people are called help vampires.

>Please don't follow the advice of this column. Be patient. Encourage anyone and everyone to ask questions, even if they're "duplicates" or "easy to answer". Use the Socratic Method (ask questions that lead to more questions). Actually teach people things.

I will not do this unless the person I'm teaching is showing a willingness to dedicate their own resources to the issues at hand. I'll do this for my own child, but if you seriously apply this online at big forums you'll get infested with help vampires. Help vampires F:ing SUCK, for real. You speak with a lot of pathos and like you've never have tried to help people a lot and had to deal with these. These people will do anything to take your energy and time away from you. They'll ask a question that's answerable in the FAQ, you'll direct them there, and they'll say "oh, it's just nicer to speak to people, can't you tell me :)?" or "my situation is very special, it's not answered by the FAQ".

I'm ranting, but holy crap having to deal with help vampires completely destroys your outlook on these things.
Yup. I ignore 99% of the threads that come by here, and I wish I could do that without bothering to read the clickbaity (and generally sensationally false) headlines.
That's extraordinarily sad. Michael K Williams, and now Lance Reddick.
4chan is a sick community where mental illness is coveted. You are correct about the 90s and finding true niche communities you could hang with, sharing ideas and ideology like the BBS days. Today is very different and the amount of brain washing put forth by anti-America bots and propaganda/make a buck machines is ridiculous.

The reality these places are pushing, including HN, is out of touch with society. Even the European stuff is so out of touch I get crazy looks and responses when I’ve asked people (Europeans) about them.
OLPC critiques go in my bucket labeled "there's no point in commenting - this is regrettably one of those topics illustrating the limited viability of collective rationality outside of a few peer review and embarrassment incentive structures". But how about this: OPLC was like a VC unicorn effort: either succeed by getting massive continental-scale buy-in with resulting network effects, else fail. Sort of the scale of what phone app stores became, but with a rather different focus. It failed - buy-in didn't happen. In part because of very active opposition from Intel and Microsoft. But instead the envisioned, quick and clear cut, win BIG or die, it found itself in a draw-out zombie twilight. The parts rotting off while crawling kind of zombie, not the chase you down for brains kind. And ever since, people have been standing over the smear of rotted bits, commenting how obviously silly it was to believe that rotted bits and smear could dramatically improve education.

For quick concrete example, wizzy professors and postdocs, who normally wouldn't invest in the creation of introductory content, were being attracted by the massiveness of the potential reach. Instead here we are, decades later, with US leading K-13 science textbooks you can easily win science-education-research list-of-common-misconceptions bingo on. NSF once almost created a national science education wiki... but didn't. Think of that scale, but bigger, of a "we almost, but no".
How much memory? ZGC is made for multi-terabyte heaps.
Three car seats for kids aged 1.5 to 7 don't really sit side by side in a mid-size SUV like a Sorrento.

Its stupid, really. Hefty, booster seats from reputable brands seats have integrated cup holders.

Cup holders.

Also, consider that a 1.5 year old's rear facing car seat is a steel reinforced monstrosity. The thing is so big, I cant install it behind the driver seat because I cant extend the seat back (Im 1-1.5 stdev above average american height).

So, the third kid's booster chair with a seat belt aligning backrest (needed for the younger kids so that the belt doesn't sit on the kid's neck) simply doesn't fit. Not if you want to reach the belt buckle.

For short trips I usually just have the oldest go booster-less. For longer trips I install the chair while she's sitting, buckled on the chair. I then lift her and the seat and muscle them in. Finally, I can pull the straps to tighten the booster chair to the backseat.

My SUV is not small. There's plenty of room. But we all drive like maniacs (guilty as charged, btw) so our kids need these massive steel reinforced cocoons.

So, why trucks? Trucks, and SUVs on truck frames (ford expedition, suburban), are wider.
A very common thought in speculative Design. Eben if it is a bit true event in the future, an imagined event can change the present as the perception of the past. See utopias and dystopia as example. If we say this known known in the future it already affected the present and also the past. It gets interesting for the unknowns unknowns if those will change the past and present. But already accepting that there unknown unknowns changes the present.
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha. He's an evil megalomaniac. His every action has only one goal - attempting to demonstrate he's the most brilliant person on Earth.

Psst. He's not succeeding.
It’s surprised nobody mentioned Beekeeper Studio. I love it. It does not have the visualize the data feature. But it’s open source and free
I am guessing that professor was talking about the project which was looking for signs of other countries developing AI by monitoring internet traffic. If memory serves it was a fairly simple setup, just watching for traffic which consumed data like a person would but much faster than a person could. Don't remember the details but the information about it was released 20 some years ago, perhaps someone else remembers more about it.

Think it is safe to say that there are secret government projects on AI and those who know about them are staying silent to avoid treason charges. To find information about big projects on AI you can look at the various think tank websites, they generally have good information but tend towards the theoretical.
The thing about the Manhattan project is that they had solid physics and maths underpinnings to their theory, and what they invested in was techniques. The sun stood as evidence at scale and Rutherford's experiment had proved atom splitting was possible. Radiation existed. Predictable and precisely measured states of matter were understood.

Theory of mind right now and the last 50 years are speculative and we have no real insight beyond connectionist views and some neuron models. Statistics can emulate aspects of vision and language but to call it "comprehension" is a stretch.

The Manhattan scientists worried they might miss the mark but that mark existed as a certainty. AI is where a metaphorical take on the nuclear age is: one of the scientists had a lump of "wood" and a match, and asked people to set it on fire: it was petrified wood. He used that as the metaphorical mountain they had to climb.

Ai doesn't even have the match yet.

A Manhattan project is a goal seeking investment by state actors to a highly specific endpoint. HIV vaccination, polio eradication, fusion energy.

What we have is DARPA engineering funding to outsider project breakthroughs. It's three orders of magnitude less certainty and funding is commensurate.
The whole house of cards you are relying on here is the bank run would not have happened had FF not made the move. The facts presented to not rise to such certainty.
Managing screenshots in documentation like a designer
Feds Charge NY Man as BreachForums Boss “Pompompurin”
Americans Head to Europe for the Good Life on the Cheap
The SIGSEGVs you are seeing are caused by these instructions:

0x8048199 <_start+299> add cl, 0x2
0x804819c <_start+302> jp 0x80481a3 <_start+309>

At this point, ECX has a value based on the initial value of your stack pointer ESP. With ASLR enabled, this is randomized by the ELF loader. The parity flag (PF) is set if the number of bits in the least significant byte of the arithmetic result (which is just CL) is even, and cleared if odd. This ends up clear about 50% of the time, so the branch isn't taken and execution continues here, which because EAX is 1 (from the previous syscall return value), is an invalid access, causing SIGSEGV:

0x804819e <_start+304> pblendw xmm2, XMMWORD PTR [eax+0x4eb3909], 0xd9

You should be able to reliably reproduce this in GDB by providing additional arguments to your program, which will adjust the initial value of ESP as they are placed on the stack. For example, this worked to always hit the SIGSEGV on my system:

gdb -ex r --args ./gibberish 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

There's another potential issue here, in that these instructions assume that the most significant bit is set in ESP, which EBP has been derived from (via ECX):

0x8048127 <_start+185> neg ebp
0x8048129 <_start+187> jns 0x804812d <_start+191>

This isn't always the case. For instance, if running your binary under QEMU's user-mode emulation, the stack is likely to be placed in the lower end of the address space, so that branch isn't taken and you will get a SIGSEGV here:

0x804812b <_start+189> cmovb edx, DWORD PTR [eax-0x72dbfbe0]
Related (of course) to https://isc.sans.edu/data/threatmap.html
Genetic Data May Link Covid to Market Dogs
https://archive.ph/eS2RS
> One problem I come across repeatedly is: how do you identify whether someone has the technical competence to do the teaching? Is there any way of knowing if they're doing a good job?

Classroom observation. It's really not that complicated.
99% of borrowers have a mortgage rate lower than 6%
I still have 2x 5.25" DDR1 based RAM disks, was somewhat popular before SSD's came onto the scene
The characterization of HN as a "question and answer" website is a fun one.

Is it wrong, or is it getting at the fact that so many people don't read the original articles, just the comments? ;)
Yes, Elon is the best, Elon tweets are the best. This is the reason we see them bloody all the time.
> If, for example, your universe is entropically uniform, is there an "arrow of time"?
No. For a system at thermodynamics equilibrium entropy is constant, neither increasing nor decreasing. So there is no arrow of time, no sense in which one direction is "the future" and the other "the past".
This comment thread is a little funny because every single HN thread outside of this one rants super aggressively about webpages that don't show any content before JS loads, but this thread has managed to collect the opposite group together for once because React's docs have updated to stop actively recommending tools that force that problem to happen.
Can this "open" option to switch firmware even cause any real damage? Millions of people travel each year with those chips and nothing happens?
Vanishing phone customer support is driving us all insane
> The number of people saying it

Popular sentiment is a pretty meaningless metric for predicting the future.
OpenAI Terms of Use (14/Mar/2023)

2. Usage Requirements

c. Restrictions

You may not

(iii) use output from the Services to develop models that compete with OpenAI;

https://openai.com/policies/terms-of-use
> The very perplexing thing is that these trucks keep getting bigger without any significant increase in hauling or seating capacity.

That's not just trucks. My parents have a recent Hyundai Ioniq. The car is fat and can have trouble fitting into parking spaces.

But there's no benefit; the extra width seems to have gone into providing empty space between the interior seats and the doors. So the usable part of the interior is just as narrow as ever, but it's harder to maneuver and you have to unbuckle and lean way the hell out of your window to interact with toll booths / parking garage machines / etc. Who wants this?
Is this how people who don't follow Elon got notifications about his tweets?
I’ve recently got into car communities and they are the most snobbiest of snobs I’ve ever met. God forbid you buy a car you enjoy. That’s not the right color/leather/wheels/transmission/tunable/mileage/year/suspension etc., how could you ever drive it?
Just as nuclear winter was supposed to wipe us long ago
I find this too. with Apple News+ I think I read more magazines than I ever have before. They've been a good experience.