skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
While it might not be fair this is commonly referred to as Market Risk for investors. Failures like SVB or CS are rare which makes them so much more painful.
As criminal as the CS bank(st)ers are, these losses are made up by what is essentially play money (central bank guarantees etc.)...

Again, depositors are saved and stock owners essentially lose all (given the low purchase price). So, whatever, I guess
Millennials are becoming middle aged
Yeah, I understand... but follow me here. If I'm using a 50 character randomly generated password on a website using my typical ({a..k} {m..z} {A..H} {J..N} {P..Z} {2..9}) token generation, then they are going to be brute forcing 6×10⁸⁷ combinations right? That's not happening. So. Randomly generated passwords for sites, managed by a password manager, are much like device bound keys, but with the added advantage that I can still type it into something that doesn't support the device if I really need to... I still like the idea of dongles especially to enhance the master password. I just don't see what it wins me over a random site password.

And, I'm absolutely going to have a password on my dongle or laptop in case of loss. I don't really trust biometrics in that scenario either really. Especially fingerprints that would be all over the laptop. Biometrics are just a convenience that I recognise offers some modicum of security. That's why hooking it up to TPM seems to not add much.

... I do get hardening where the passwords are stored though... although, if the disc is encrypted using TPM (which linux definitely supports), I guess the main attack you'd be concerned about would be the OS being compromised while running, but aren't we just back to loggers then?
We could discuss whether it is reasonable for an actual leak: information which is accurate in its details, so as for to be vanishingly improbable that it's anything but a leak.

Information that is false isn't a leak; it's rumor anyone could have started, pretending to be a Facebook insider. Someone could have forged an e-mail, which someone else believed and so it goes.

You can't simultaneously say that it's a fabrication, and imply that it's a real leak by calling for someone to be let go.

Everyone who received the e-mail would have first seen the subject line "Please Resign" and that it's from Zuckerberg, before seeing that it has many recipients. That doesn't seem very reasonable, even in case of an actual leak.
I meant specifically protobuffers in that case, but sure, that works.
I updated the model in that file, deployed again using Vercel but still same error.
Bootstrap is great, but sometimes a project starts getting bigger than the prototype stage and requires custom styling and edge-case stuff that Bootstrap alone can't cater for. By all means, use it, but don't rely on it when you start doing custom stuff.
I don't like seeing no mention of electrical safety in the description of a device like this.
I'm specifically speaking of Ubuntu's version of Gnome, I guess. Press the Super key and a search box appears, a la MacOS's Spotlight. This is how I open apps. There are likely nuances about what is searchable, but in practice it feels the same to me.
ChatGPT can do all of those things the same way it responds to prompts: by stealing the answers from other people.

If ChatGPT weren't just remixing and regurgitating billions of hours of work by other people, it would be unimpressive.
I think a lot of "good" developers making this very argument will be in for a nasty surprise when they find out which bucket they're actually in
Obvious question: why a new low level programming language when we have C, Zig, Nim? What are its strengths over these?
VeraId: Domain Names Without the Internet
Keep in mind there's a token limit. Once you pass that limit it no longer remembers.

Yes. You are pointing out various flaws which again is quite obvious. Everyone knows of the inconsistencies with these LLMs.

Too this I again say that the LLM understands some things and doesn't understand other things, its understanding of things is inconsistent and incomplete.

The only thing needed to prove understanding is to show chatGPT building something that can only be built by pure understanding. If you see one instance of this, then it's sufficient to say on some level chatGPT understands aspects of your query rather then doing a trivial query-response correlation you're implying is possible here.

Let's examine the full structure that was built here:

chatGPT was running an emulated terminal with an emulated internet with an emulated chatGPT with an emulated terminal.

It's basically a recursive model of a computer and the internet relative to itself. There is literally no exact copy of this anywhere in it's training data. chatGPT had to construct this model via correctly composing multiple concepts together.

The composition cannot occur correctly without chatGPT understanding how the components compose.

It's kind of strange that this was ignored. It was the main point of the example. I didn't emphasize this because this structure is obviously the heart of the argument if the article was read to the end.

Literally to generate the output of the final example chatGPT has to parse bash input execute the command over a simulated internet onto a simulated version of himself and again parse the bash sub command. It has a internal stack that it must use to put all the output together into a final json output.

So while It is possible for simple individual commands to be correlated with similar training data... for the highly recursive command on the final prompt.... There is zero explanation for how chatGPT can pick this up off of some correlation. There is virtually no identical structure on the internet... It has to understand the users query and compose the response from different components. That is the only explanation left.
The comment you responded to said

> I agree with you that inconvenient truths now get muzzled because they don’t fit an acceptable meta-narrative. This is very problematic for society and when taken to the maximum, can lead to thinks like Cambodia’s attempt at restarting society by killing all those who didn’t fit the model they were looking for.

And then you took issue with the description of the Cambodian genocide. Despite the fact that he was agreeing with you. Now you start a whole new argument. I'm not even sure what are you trying to argue about.
I've been trying out some more things and I think you might have to do some more prompt engineering for ChatGPT.

Prompts sometimes result in valid results but sometimes in a SyntaxError "Unexpected token 'A', "An error o"... is not valid JSON".
I also encountered other SyntaxErrors like "the string did not match the pattern".
I would guess this might be related to invalid requests to the Spotify API.

Also, it is possible to directly communicate with ChatGPT. Its responses are then output through a playlistContentFormatter error.

Hope this might help.
And still, great product!
If anyone needs a pretty basic alternative with Windows support, there's Rush:

https://github.com/shenwei356/rush

I use it pretty extensively with ffmpeg, imagemagick and the like.

I'd been using the mmstick/parallel for a while, but it moved to RedoxOS repos and then stopped being updated, while still having some issues not ironed out.

https://github.com/shenwei356/rush
I am not an expat, but I was considering spending several months in China.

After Hong Kong, there was a strong message of "Americans caused this," likewise after covid there was a strong message of "this didn't start in China, this actually started in America."

It wasn't just a message of "America is our enemy," but looking at how the People in Hong Kong were robbed of due process from an impartial justice system it was clear that if there was a problem we would also not get due process.

The Canadians arrested without due process in response to Huawei leaders being arrested was another story that says "China might do bad things to you in response to things you don't have control over."

As an American I felt it was made clear that we were the enemy and we would not get due process.

I was planning to spend several months in China, but chose not to because of Hong Kong. My choice was re-inforced because of the covid response.

I am open to the idea that international media was being unfair to China, but I had experiences which made me realize this was not the case.

- I met a person who just got out of china. She was an early 20s English teacher who didn't know why she was put in prison, but spent a couple weeks in Chinese prison until the US state department said 'give her back, now.' She figured she failed some kind of political question she was asked or made a statement about Taiwan she shouldn't have. She said she probably would still be there if her boyfriend hadn't called the US state department saying he hasn't heard from her and didn't know what happened.

- Another woman I met on a plane said that the people who ran the school she taught at threatened to revoke her visa trapping her in China. She said she was leaving for "vacation" but was not going to go back. She was also visibly shaken.

- A Hong Kong person I met broke down the way China was destroying Hong Kong culture and acting like an imperial ruler.

- Hong Kong went from feeling like a lively place to feeling like a dominated place. The energy left the city.

- Seeing the video of Triads in the train station made it clear that the Chinese government was in bed with organized crime. Seeing triads be the foot soldiers of the CPC was something I had never seen before. It made it clear that if China wanted to achieve a goal, it would use any method regardless of how right or wrong it is. It was just one more element of "our legal system is pretext, we will do what we want."

- I spent some time in China with a Chinese woman and she was constantly "correcting" me about any implication that Hong Kong or Taiwan was a country. It made me realize that I can't just hide my beliefs, they will manifest in my language, and that will put me at risk.
I bet if you sit in a quiet dark room, all alone, in silence, with no distractions possible... and say out loud "What is my next step?" and wait 10 minutes... you'll get a very clear answer in your head. It may not be the answer you think you want to hear, or even the answer you think others would give you. But rest assure it'll be the best think possible for you to do.
India’s Narendra Modi has a problem: high economic growth but few jobs
Insulfated cocaine has a unique problem in that it first needs to be diluted in water in order to properly test, then somehow dried back out into powder before it can be used.

It’s fairly cumbersome and removes a lot of the appeal of the drug. Most casual cocaine users want the experience to be just that, casual. Having to buy a bag of blow then go home and run a chemistry experiment on it is a much different vibe than taking quick bump from some nice new friend you made at the bar.

Most people I know who are casual users have just decided to stop instead of going through the hassle.
If you thing self-checkout reduces clerk work by a factor of 10 you have not worked in low margin high throughput retail. Anyway, from experience i can tell you it’s a gradual affair.
Its clear y'all have no idea how much it costs to connect that amount of bandwidth everywhere around the planet. It's not just the edge costs that are huge, just carrying that bandwidth around internally and between devices is a massive infrastructure.
The US and Vietnam are very strong allies now, its unlikely that will ever happen.
Maybe I’m just misreading but it sounds like you’re saying the same thing — non-teaching costs are growing much faster than teaching costs
And many of the Vietnamese factories are owned by China.
Other parts of the format could have stricter limitations than the header, so the these fields being 32 bits doesn't necessarily mean it's not a format limitation Though I agree it's probably an implementation issue.
but PiEEG it is open-source! project, is it important ?
I think you could make an argument that ChatGPT is essentially a really powerful compression tool, and that its just reposting material that third parties uploaded. You would try to argue to the judge that you are presenting the user with a compressed form of the training data, and that the training data is all third party.

I don't know that this argument will be easily able to convince a judge, but there's a world where it happens.
your*
Why retirement age matters for Social Security and Medicare
Jaccard my Dice please.
Hearing people say that there's a path from ChatGPT to AGI is like hearing that there's a path from a rollercoaster to a fighter jet.
People use words and phrases in a distinctive way and the kind of modelling that GPT-4 is based on ought to be pretty good at identifying that (better than it is at real understanding or doing math.)

My prediction: if you picked out 20 pieces of text written by similarly prolific bloggers, it will get it right somewhere between 14-18 cases. 20 is a good number to use for an experiment, 1 doesn't really prove anything. With 20 I am pretty certain you'll see it gets it right sometimes and gets it wrong sometimes.
NYS changes minimum scores for student proficiency in math, English
You should also include marketcap / assets

If there are some banks out there valued at xxxx with only yyy in assets, thats good to know
With ipython and Deno pasting a giant amount of content is quite nice.

Deno:

press "`", press Ctrl-V or Command-V, press "`"

Now that is in _

With ipython:

press "'''", press Ctrl-V or Command-V, press "'''"

Now that is in _

In Deno this won't run something on Ctrl-V, until you press enter, which shows it supports bracketed paste:

`test
here`; throw new Error('ran this code without pressing enter');
`end`

In node that will run.

In ipython this won't run w/o pressing enter:

'''line
another
'''
raise RuntimeError('ran this w/o pressing enter')
'''continued'''

In python it will, if you paste it somewhere, remove the leading spaces that I added for HN, and copy and paste it again.
You can't put a nuclear reactor in a car. You can charge an electric car's battery using nuclear electricity, of course. But if you're just charging a terrestrial battery then nuclear power's attractive attributes for the Moon (like continuing to produce during a 14 day period of darkness) are less salient. Electricity sources like wind and solar power are likely to charge up the car's battery at lower cost.

You don't need batteries if the energy is readily available throughout the route.

Examples:

1. Buses that use capacitors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_electric_vehicle

2. Trains / Bullet Trains / Trolleys that could have that energy along their line.

Car dependency could be rapidly reduced if we truly wanted.
I just asked ChatGPT the definition of Confidence Interval in Statistics. It wrote a very elegant, authoritative and eloquent, but completely wrong explanation, that interestingly, matches the most common misconception around Confidence Intervals.

Specialist jobs are not in danger yet. However the level of bullshitting will increase to such levels, there is a business opportunity here: One for tools capable of identifying the errors, spit out by these very impressive automatic parrots.
Show HN: Gmailify.com extends Gmail with custom domains
The way we work is about to change
I don't really want to get too deep into it because this same discussion comes up every time there's an article about FreeBSD :)

But my personal reasons are:

- Less commercial influence on the OS and "distro" development process (think of things like Canonical pushing snap and other not-invented-here behaviour)

- A stable (release-based) base OS with rolling packages. The perfect combination which for some reason is not as common in the Linux world. There it's usually all-rolling or all-release.

- The ports collection - Recompile any repository package with any parameters you like

- Excellent documentation because the world is not as fragmented as on GNU/Linux

- Not as much drive to constantly change things as on GNU/Linux (which is partly driven by point #1 of course)

- ZFS on root <3 And jails and bhyve
We've become so accustomed to Section 230 being a cop-out for any kind of accountability for big tech companies, we assume it will be played here also.
I bet he can drive a car.
If it does not, then it should be amended so it would. It's the Section 230 that made the US the leader in WWW, rather than Europe or another country. Huge economic net gain.
Jests asside, I've mostly used the closely related Dice coefficient when measuring segmentation reliability
It doesn't need to be wickedness. It's group thinking. In general, people want to belong to a group or groups. Then it is easy to fall into the trap of us-vs-them thinking. Also animals show this behavior.
Also, people want to find meaning, and they use their pattern matching instincts to accomplish that. This explains why people tend to see meaning in for example pictures captured by giant telescopes, or shooting stars for that matter. It's the reason why they built it in the first place.
Right, wrong, ought, shall,... all invented by people. The universe only has 'is' and 'was', no 'ought'.
Ask HN: What Is hackernews.hn?
So there's this website that I came across: hackernews.hn. I found it by pure chance while simply browsing random TLDs. I saw ".hn" and thought, "oh, that would be fitting for HN," then finding a real operational HN proxy under hackernews.hn. I don't know who operates this or with what intent—perhaps some of the regulars on here might know? I'm genuinely curious, although I understand that this is pretty silly. Whois doesn't reveal any interesting information, neither does the HN search.
> best

Define 'best'

But with my almost 10 years with Fastmail I had very small amounts of spam.
It seems like it's setting gpt-4 here as well: https://github.com/enricoros/nextjs-chatgpt-app/blob/466a366...

But come on, read through the source, look for the issue, I'm sure you can track down at least something :)
> The question now is how well the ambitious treaty will be implemented.

and enforced? seens pretty worthless to me, though the intent is good.
If you're going to analyze the Ukraine war in terms of US policy then you'll have to take into account more than the financial world. The US's position in Ukraine affects a number of other policy positions like our political alliance's, how much we want to let Russia grow its power in opposition to our own, and even to Taiwan and how we want China to feel about any possible US responses to invasion there.
> You have things like the 40 hour workweek due to protestors doing illegal things like that, and often getting flat-out murdered back in the day.

Yes, and they kept at it until they won because they believed in their cause and were able to gain more and more public support.

>> Probably worth noting that the folks in the convoy didn't have broad support in their industry

> You have to be very careful with these kinds of arguments because you'll find that tactics which get used against people you don't like may get immediately flipped around and used against people you do like, or even yourself.

It is the job of a movement to convince others that their goals are noble and that others should support them.

If the Convoy Truckers failed to convince that others in their industry (and the broader public) to support them, (a) they're bad at communicating, or (b) folks concluded they're a bunch of anti-vaxxer cranks and didn't want anything to do with them, (c) …?.
Even if the main tool is manipulation, you would have to assume that the humans retained at least some agency in this system. And if you truly think that a singular intelligence could just puppeteer entire civilizations, you’re using the same rationalist scarecrow trap that there isn’t some vastly likelier middle ground that we should be more concerned about (but by definition is less dramatic and therefore less fun to write about)
How to Make Useful Charts and Reports
Apple invented the PDA (even the term) with the Newton in 1992. Steve wasn't with the company at the time, but given the company wouldn't have existed without him it isn't really that much of a stretch to say they wouldn't necessarily exist without his influence.
ChatGPT 5+ should be able to defend itself in court, support suing itself, help to draft new law and everything in between. We’re for interesting ride here for sure. Legal system won’t keep up with the pace things are changing. They can aid themselves with some AI though.
I remember following the story at the time, and this is quite the opposite of what the general public was told.
That's represented by the price-to-book ratio. Which essentially is marketcap / net assets.

Logically, it should not go bellow 1, if it does, it means that the market thinks something is wrong with the company.
Absolutely not what I am saying, please read up.
Aren't producers already using digital sax for years now? The saxophone market for session players has probably already been decimated.
People have be “predicting” or more like coming to an educated guess using the plethora of public data on these subreddits for many years. I used to be an active poster on wallstreetbets years before the meme stock stuff and there was always people like you who would come after the fact and be like I can’t believe you predicted the future, but they never showed up when I was wrong. It’s only a weird timeline because you probably joined these subreddits after the hype not before.
I listened to the question and answer at the timestamped link, and I wonder if he was giving a completely bogus answer to see if anyone was paying attention. Consider:

> I have for most of my life, because I was sort of born into it, run Apple.

Assuming that's actually still Ken Thompson talking, that makes absolutely no sense. He's several years older than Woz, never mind Apple itself. He was already well into developing Unix on DEC minicomputers when the Apple I came out in 1976. Then, all through the 80s and 90s, I'm sure he used whatever non-Apple computers they used at Bell Labs. I think I read somewhere that by the 90s they were using x86 PCs. Anyway, you get the idea. So I wonder if he was totally messing with us in that answer.
Oh yeah, changing 33 lines is truly revolutionary!
> This is also one of the main reasons why all programming jobs were not outsourced to India.

There's a whole industry here in America that re-shores programming contracts. They know they can't underbid Indian/foreign body shops so they just wait a few months and call back the companies who went with cheaper programmers. If the company is still around it's generally a complete re-write.
Yeah, but quantum mechanics and general relativity (arguably just QM and special relativity) don't make sense. Talk to any theoretical physicist at the frontier of quantum field theory or quantum gravity and you will meet people very interested in basic philosophical questions.

If all you care about is laying a bra against a ket or calculating scattering amplitudes I suppose the philosophical questions are far away from you, in more or less the same way that one could employ epicicular models to calculate planetary motion with as good or better accuracy that using general relativity. But if you want to _understand_ the motion of heavenly bodies you must do more than just calculate.
Both the prosecution and the defense will be using GPT against one another.
> I understand that it might come at the cost of some personal freedom but I'm willing to pay that price for a great society in return.

Does China provide that? Honest question, I don't know much about it.

I visited Beijing once, and it ranks on the bottom of the cities I'd like to live in. Of course, it's just my personal impression and Beijing is obviously not representative of the whole China.