skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's suggesting a move it saw come after a move somewhere. Or it's creating a token it thinks comes next.
That's only a compelling argument to people who both take sci-fi seriously and believe in it as prophecy. Many, many people don't; and the people that do are mainly computer geeks.

Personally, I think AGI is the the current-era version of the personal atomic-powered autogyro.
Intuit is moving away from React Native
https://github.com/20urc3/Sekiryu
I think we all started replying to a sibling comment that quoted from Dijkstra and we got it threaded wrong.

"Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes”
- Edsger Dijkstra
GPT-5 figures out that if it picks up the knife instead of the bag of chips, it can prevent the human with the stick from interfering with carrying out its instructions.
Responding to this video, I really liked this take from Aaron Blaise (animator on Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin and director of Brother Bear) on AI in animation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xm7BwEsdVbQ

> To be honest with you, the biggest threat to our industry is not the AI.
I mean when you look at any technology's ever come along in the entertainment industry, the expressiveness, the ability to create new films and new ideas has exploded.
As an end result it has actually created more jobs and budgets have actually gone up.
If you look at the budgets now compared to what they were back in the 90s, they're doubled.

> The biggest threat I think is an age-old threat: it's bad stories and bad management.
That's what's going to get rid of jobs, if you're putting out consistently bad movies under bad management, because no one's going to go see them.

> So the idea is that it doesn't matter what technology you're putting on it. Make sure that the story underneath all of that technology is good, make sure it's engaging, make sure it's something that people want to go to, so they can laugh and cry and be scared and learn something.
We had that. It was called Covid. Two years later we are still dealing with the first phase of the completely predictable results rolling lock downs caused. In another 5 we will start dealing with the unpredictable ones.

Here's hoping that we're wise enough to not let reddit admits dictate world health policy again.
But then it was one case out of thousands of games that Carlsen played. In the article ChatGPT is ding illegal moves in 3 games out of 19.

The sample is smallm but the rate is much, much, higher. You'd expect maybe one, or none at all. Even for a supposed 1400 ELO player. Because even 800 ELO players rarely do that many illegal moves I think.
Could be, but if you look at Preset, you are dealing with honestly a parity product as far as I can tell.

> There's also going to be crazy price pressure from GPT4 tools in this segment.

Not really, error rate must = 0 for database tools.
Have you done a resting metabolic rate test to establish a baseline for total daily energy expenditure?

The GLP-1 drugs can be a net benefit for some patients but they come with serious side effects. In particular most patients lose significant amounts of lean muscle tissue, which is a risk factor for metabolic diseases and sarcopenia.

https://peterattiamd.com/ama45/
Have you tried KoboldAI? It can run, among other more mundane things, some pretty large ERP models. Its been making me lose sleep this week. :D
I love technology, but I don’t get how anyone can think it’s wise to let their children stare at a screen all day. My nieces and nephews spend all of their time staring at iPads, but my children have much more limited screen time rules. It’s a small sample population, but my kids are generally pretty calm and well behaved. I love my nieces and nephews, but they are heathens.
This is great! My Scrabble-obsessed parents will love it.
chatgpt does not really know how to play chess, or understand chess. it understands how to sound like it plays chess.
This is terrible. The idea of ChatGPT being able to fill in gaps of not knowing what you don’t know is appealing, but you need to actually know something about the topic to evaluate ChatGPTs ability.

This is just spewing pure nonsense, and the author thinks he has learned something from it.
I'm just another incarnation of you anyway, so it's not even stealing.
MT7921 M.2 card, I've not noticed any interference, but I've also not been actively checking for that.
I guess this comes down to how you define exist and illusion. I don't think I'd agree on your definition of illusion at least.

I'm not sure what you mean that it doesn't exist in a classical sense. That qualia, subjective experience and consciousness are not concrete entities? That something doesn't exist if its an emergent property or that something doesn't exist if its a process?
Joke aside: I would imagine someone at Google looking at all that YouTube data and thinking what everyone else is thinking...

Considering that LLaMA shows us capable a smaller model can be when trained on an extremely large dataset, this feels like a no-brainer.

I await the actual announcement.
If we reverse time, would gravitational waves flow backwards?
The final episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation played with this concept [1].

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Good_Things..._(Star_Trek:...
Am I the only one who thinks this is a really bad idea?

By offloading your cognitive tasks to an AI, even though you now look smarter, you're becoming dumber in the long run, because you're never really challeging and exercising your intelect. This book[1] goes into a lot of detail about how rote memorization and recall is essential to critical thinking (you have a limited working memory, and the way by which you're able to critically think about complex subjects is by chunking, which only works with concepts you've previously memorized). If you just stop exercising your recall and critical thinking, they'll get weaker and weaker.

I feel that already with ChatGPT. Before, whenever I needed to learn some programming concept, I'd have to search vast amounts of resources to learn it. By being exposed to many different points of view, I always felt that what I had learned stuck with me for much longer. If I just ask ChatGPT, I get the answer faster, but I also forget faster. It's not learning.

Learning, with capital L, is not supposed to be easy. It's supposed to be hard. Education is about making what is hard a worthwhile pursuit. The people who get lured into thinking they'll be smarter if they plug themselves to the matrix will be shooting themselves in the foot.

For me, relying on OpenAI to function cognitively is like relying on Google to turn my lightbulb on. It looks cool, but it doesn't make any sense.

[1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4959061-why-don-t-studen...
> But since it is so highly trained you can mistake it for a master if you squint and don't look into what it is doing.

But it is a master, as has been pointed out repeatedly. If you replace all illegal moves with resignations, and use the same style of prompt as the OP did, then it plays like an expert. I'm objecting because you're making it sound like it's a trivial result.
Not GP, but what NVidia Triton can do includes

- Dynamic batching while limiting latency to a set threshold

- Running multiple instances of a model, effectively load-balancing inference requests.

- Loading/unloading/running multiple versions of models dynamically, which is useful if you want to update (or roll back) your model while not interfering with existing inference requests.

Its client provides async based inference APIs, so you can easily put a FastAPI-based API server in front and don't necessarily need a queue (like Celery).
I would never speak to a therapist unless all the laws regarding mandatory reporting, red flags, FAA and firearms licensing record searches, and involuntary committal are repealed. Until then they are a huge blinking hazard that the slightest misinterpreted phrase will result in serious legal hassles.
Fuel is less dense than water (.8025 g/ml vs. 1.0) and the MQ-9 is designed to fly in all weather conditions. So it's highly unlikely the fuel bent the tip of the prop.

Given that just one blade is bent, the contact had to be very fleeting (there wasn't time for the next blade to come around and also strike the Su-27). It's bad luck on the Russian pilot's part to cause something undeniable like this - but this isn't stopping Moscow from making obviously untrue claims.

Cold-war story time. In college I had a roommate who was former Navy, and he told me of the time that they pranked the Soviets. Their group of ships had been shadowed by a Soviet "fishing vessel"[0] and they had gotten tired of them stooging around. At the time it was normal for ships to dump their trash overboard [1] in weighted bags. So they prepared a bag by filling it with the 80's best "adult education material" - only with all the good parts cut out and various insults scribbled on the pages. And topped it off with the messiest of slops from the galley. They intentionally did not add the steel weight, and tossed it off the stern. A gleeful crowd gathered to watch as the Soviets swooped in to collect their floating "intelligence haul".

Moral of the story - pranking is one thing. Intentionally or accidentally causing a collision? Not cool.

[0] Probably one of these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primor%27ye-class_surveillance...

[1] They now compress and store most waste until they return to port: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpFF6c3C730
Sure, but for less than $20 a month.
> it is soul-crushingly manipulative

In what way?

I’m a CA resident, and I support the contractor status (mainly due to general support of a flexible labor market). I’m willing to change my stance if there is a good reason to do so.
He literally used the same prompt as the article.

Claim: "ChatGPT's Chess Elo is 1400"

Reality: ChatGPT gives illegal moves (this happened to article author too), something a 1400 ranked player would never do

Result: ChatGPT's rank is not 1400.
Calibre let's you convert in bulk fwiw
As was announced, this is only for SMS-based 2FA, so the title is a little misleading.
OMG Erol's internet was my first ISP as a kid in elementary school here in NJ. It provided my first experiences into the web and I remember it fondly because of that.

One of the first tech based mistakes I ever made was to convince my parents to switch from Erols(which had decent ping times on online gaming) to AOL (which had horrendously bad ping times) all because I thought I was missing out on the exclusive content that AOL provided. I do recall fun memories living in AOL's walled garden but giving up that ping time was horrendously bad. I once ripped out the phone wire from the jack in extreme frustration (first time tech made me angry lol!)

We eventually switched to Earthlink(and then I think Juno?) once the AOL 1 year contract was up. Excellent ping times but man Erols will always have that spot in my memories.

I miss all the excitement and innovation happening back then. I wish we still had mom and pop stores providing things like internet services. Even startups today don't feel like they could be done as simple "mom n pop" enterprises although im sure there are plenty hiding in places we dont often look.
> In contrast to AI’s many benefits is the fact that it will displace millions of people around the world from their current workplace roles, especially those in white-collar jobs such as customer service, copywriting, and computer programming. It has already started to do so.

Citation needed.
The same can be said for education in general. Many people openly state that it's not worth their time. But most of us would agree that "life's short, ain't nobody got time for education" approach would be devastating for society.

The problem with technology is that people are using it everywhere without having any clue of what it does, let alone how it works. Common sense stops working the moment anything tech becomes involved. Businesses and governments have clearly noticed, and is actively exploiting this. Invasive tracking, DRMs, illegal mass surveillance, or the constant encryption ban proposals might not have gone this far if people had a little more understanding of computers.
Snobbery while doing the most trendy thing is usually pretty silly. IPAs are a perfect example of this. IPAs weren't some obscure thing 20 years, but now they are hip so everyone "loves" the most hoppy beer they can find.
Virtual Currencies (and Other Digital Assets) Under the U.S. UCC (2021)
Balaji bets $1M that USD will suffer hyperinflation within 90 days
Ruffle.rs: First post, progress report
Stackoverflow does not suck, it is you.

I haven't done iOS programming for maybe 5 years? The last time I did was in school for a project. So I am complete dummy when it comes to iOS programming.

Therefore, I went to google and typed: "how to create darkmode in ios app".

Second result: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/appearance_c...

Stackoverflow is like your experienced coworker(A) who has been programming for years and is tired of coworkers(B) who come up to him, interrupt his programming session that took 40 minutes to get into to ask "I can't figure xyz out".

Then:

A - *stares into a wall, trying to contain his rage* did you google it?

B - of course I did!

A - *googles it first result has an answer* here I will send you the link

Then the next day it happens again and again and again.

Until A is so dead inside he stops programming just to not be interrupted in his state of flow again.

SO allowed me to resolve literally 99% of my programming problems. I literally did not have a need to post a question on SO and I'm now writing some stuff in blazor, which is like a year old.
If we change the analogy of throwing a ball to firing a gun into the air - does the analogy still work? Since when we fire the gun up, the bullet will travel faster up than it will travel down due to terminal velocity in forward time. How is that phenomenon explained in reverse time?
Yes, for sure. Some applications of procedural texture primitives (like Perlin Noise) that I wasn't super familiar with and for example "quaternion" which I never heard about before trying to write a game.
No single effort will overthrow Putin, but a combination of many efforts will.
There goes captcha
Ok, I see a lot of points here but reading them I do not get the sense that you really understood what I wrote, and they don't seem to be connected to what you wrote before. So I guess the best option forward is to just go back to what you actually said so that you can try again:

> the question is if FF had done nothing, would they have been better off?

Yes. We know that FF did not get their portcos fully out in time, including the only company they need to return the fund. Their portfolio downside might be partially mitigated—they totally lose, let's say, 40% of seed-B portcos instead of 70%—but it doesn't really matter because a non-backstopped run kills 80% of seed-B startups immediately.

The rational move for companies is to pull out but for VC firms the rational move is to encourage people to stay.
Under FIDE rules it's first a forfeit after the second illegal move, so if anything it would seem that the interpretation used by the article author underestimates its ELO ranking.
The main ideas it that theoretically the demand should shift to greener alternative. However, as far as I understand the issue is that currently it shifts the demand to another producer. There is this concept of additionality in carbon offsets but it's intractable to measure. IMHO the only way to really prevent it would be to pay most or all polluters so they stop. One day we might get there when we've offset most emission sources of a given type (ie say land forest). But in the meantime, those offsets are not actually moving the needle. And also, does that mean we should start paying via carbon offsets every single owner of an oil pit so they don't get oil off the ground?
They are disproving an assertion. Demonstrating that an alternate approach implodes the assertion is a perfectly acceptable route, especially when the original approach was cherry-picking successes and throwing out failures.

I wish I could just make bullshit moves and get a higher chess ranking. Sounds nice.
It 'sucks' because you expect to be completely babysitted and that doesn't happen ? Besides the fact it has helped millions of programmers billions of times ? That's plain ridiculous.
This would perfectly explain deja vu.
I decided to test every non-NaN 32-bit float, and confirmed that's the only such case.

Edit: Hee-hee! And if I put my source into Godbolt's Compiler Explorer, compile with gcc 12.2 -O3 -ffast-math then my program turns into:

main:
xor eax, eax
ret
Instead of predominately striking the bullet in a way that causes it to slow down, the molecules in the air will predominately strike it in a way that causes it to move faster, in what looks like an unbelievable (but still physically possible) run of good luck.
https://dev.java/
Good observation, it's challenging to solve these problems, here's how we are going about it -

To reduce false positives - we run the same request twice to eliminate flaky fields in response like current timestamp, mock the downstream dependencies as they behaved in prod env and are providing options to ignore / modify the sampled requests

To make integration easier - we are building on top of opentelemetry which has seen remarkable increase in support across languages / frameworks, which makes it easier for us to support different tech stacks.

Regression testing - our primary goal is to provide regression tests. We have come across two type of teams where this makes sense - companies with low test coverage and companies which high number of micro-services as they find it hard to cover every production scenario in tests
(https://archive.is/pkbDA)

Germany is most likely primarily acting in self-interest here. Boo!

That said, I'm not sure it's feasible to bring up more electric power supply/grid capacity in time for a ban on new ICE vehicles 12 years from now.
shhh, you're getting close to exposing my guaranteed employment secrets
> You mean they targeted the enemy that NATO was attacking?

Croatian Republic of Herzeg-Bosnia?

Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina?

Kosovo Liberation Army?

Republic of Croatia?

All of them had people charged by the ICTY, but I don’t think anyone thinks of those as “the enemy NATO was attacking”.
I wouldn't call it Skynet but I can envision a scenario where individuals wanting to "bring the system down" may let GPT4 to control their machines as an attempt to inflict some damage in the real world. It could range from benign things such as DDoS attacks to more serious stuff like attempting to control some communication channel that could lead to widespread panic and destructive reactions. Think about a series of fake interactions between heads of states, or mass creation of fake content that may lead people to react in a certain way.

We should not take these things lightly.
No, the author of the article specifically says that the entire move sequence should be supplied to chatGPT each time, not simply the next move. Be very careful when "disproving" an experiment with squinted eyes.
Oh my the applications. Since ChatGPT capabilities for personalization are amazing already, this could help give a series of steps for anything given an image/video:

1. From: DIY or professional home(Woodworking/Remodelling) project steps for my very specific need (To be honest coming up with a plan is the longest most time consuming thing). Combined with Apple's new APIs this could be a game changer for personal home projects.

2. To: Move planning for a dance competition based on competitor's Videos. A bit of a stretch but definitely happening in the near future
Well, Samsung is korean.
This is literally an article that is pointing to a research paper that doesn't definitely conclude anything.
You might be surprised how even people as aggressive or stubborn as this might still find it embarrassing or unreasonable to refuse a lunch-and-learn. Maybe sending a mass invite to a meeting on Python would be seen as passive aggressive, so just start socializing smaller ideas with key people. It sounds like you'd have to be cautious about upsetting people but I think it's always worth it to at least find the most polite and diplomatic ways to suggest things you want at opportune moments. The times I see this backfire is when people let it monopolize their attention or bring negative tone/attitudes.
Nice! Happy to share our experience if it helps :)
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0105101v2
In Punjab too we have a yearly festival on January 13th, Lohri, where everybody eats peanut, jaggery, & nut seeds. I have not heard any peanut allergies there.
The best experience of stackoverflow is when I search a problem, and the top search result is a stackoverflow link, I click on it, and... it's been closed by the mods with no answer or pointer to a solution. "But I have the exact same problem!" I blurt out. "Too bad," says stackoverflow.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_illusion#Working_Mem...
Plato was largely right though, when looking at the individual alone. It is still a problem, thinking you understand something because you could look it up. It permits hypothetical access to facts but not the synthesis of knowledge from those facts. Anyone reading this could look up the latin terms "manus" and "facere", but unless they do, they probably won't spontaneously understand the etymology of "manufacture" as I mention it.

What he didn't factor in was the effect on information logistics. This turned out to outweigh the drawbacks of more false wisdom.
> you're making this sound like it's a trivial result

I don't think this is a trivial result, emulating a highly trained idiot is still very impressive. But it is very different from an untrained genius.
> ... Sadly? I guess the Ukrainians should just bow over and welcome their new Russian overlords? Or what are you suggesting here?

Life for the masses of the people is generally the same no matter who rules them. When this war is over the Ukrainian rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer as it has been in the US for the last 40 years or so.

The idea that life for Ukrainians under Russian hegemony will be worse than life under a EU/US hegemony is false.

The Ukrainian regimes of the last 15 years decided to turn the country into one the sticks it to Russia on behalf of the US. They basically sacrificed their countrymen's wellbeing to service the geopolitical goals of the US and now Ukrainians are suffering dearly for it.

Read this - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35180460

I can't be repeating myself on the Russian/Ukraine war ad infinitum.

This war is not being sustained for the benefit of ordinary Ukrainians. This war will end, and that end will involve negotiations, whether this year or in 10 years time. The main sufferers here are the Ukrainians, not their political leaders who have stashed enough abroad to live comfortable lives no matter the outcome of the war, and the US can bribe them even further to prolong the war as much as is possible, much as they bribed Saddam Hussein to prosecute the war against Iraq for 8 years.

Whatever the Western powers are doing in Ukraine, is it not for the benefit of the ordinary Ukrainian, just the bankers and the industrialists.
Tired of Crypto hype? Well, it passed. Now they hype is big on AI. Useful things will surely come out of it but before lots of money will be made on hype alone.
> something a 1400 ranked player would never do

The fact that rules and articles exist describing what to do if you or your opponent makes an illegal move indicates this is not the case.

Humans are also... human. They make mistakes. It may not happen often at 1400, but to say that it'll never happen is preposterous.
They're delicious by the way, once you get over the fact that they look a lot like Cheetos.
Huh, sounds a little like how Overwatch unfolded! Strong start, a lot of enthusiasm, now everybody's pretty much over it and the competitive scene is dying (?)