skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Just read the serious sources, like the NY Times or Washington Post. They have serious news and are not 'rage inducing'. (Skip the editorial pages.)
I mean, the notepad method still works, and there's nothing stopping you from going down that route. Hell, you can probably make it easier: open up a browser on any page, open up the inspector console, and you've got a REPL and semi-visual environment right there at your fingertips. A combination of that and using notepad to "save" your progress would probably be a pretty potent learning tool.

I don't really know what your point here is. Professionals use different tools to beginners to program? Yes, obviously this is the case. I started making videos with Windows MovieMaker, but that is unlikely to be the favoured tool when editing together a Marvel blockbuster. But you can learn a lot just by using more simple tools and then graduating to the more complicated ones when you find you need them.
And that is your free choice. I am sure they were many employers in the days after the union movement who decided not to hire because they believed in making employees work 20 hours a day and they were afraid of retribution if they pushed the line. And that is fine - these folks would have lost out business to other employers who appeased the "mob" as you call it. There is only so much a single person can scale out to, after all. Other employers will fill the vacuum.

It is interesting you haven't responded to the guy who believes in profit at all costs. If you truly believe that, then yes, its best not to hire people.
There is a city called Busan, that is 350km from North Korea instead of 40km. In case Kim decides to do the stupid, it makes a difference.
I honestly don't know but I've had it explained to me that it is the acting on said information that would be considered an offence. Either way: if someone were to do this with an ordinary Joe amount of money, nothing would happen. But say you took out a second mortgage and moved $1M - then that could probably be considered suspect. Who knows what that means.
The employee computers got put on the cloud, which let them be shared.
> The worst form of loneliness is only having memories nobody else shares

It depends on people. I have plenty of memories I share alone and I am happy to do so. I am not nostalgic so the "it was better then" does not work for me.

I am much, much more interested to sharing the present with people, i.e. meeting them for the sake of meeting and not doing extraordinary things together.
It can be the main driver for some, but not the only one for all :)
OK, people attempt photorealistic art when of course, the best they can hope for is to look as realistic as a photograph would.

As someone else mentioned, people play chess for fun. People do things that they will never be as good at as computers.

I don't buy this idea that people need to be the "best" at something to enjoy it. Living that way dooms you to always being unhappy
I loved bored apes tbh and wish they appeared in a different context. Like as a pepe alternative.
Busan is 350km away from NK instead 40km, it makes a difference in case of war
Travelling alone for me has yielded two massive benefits:

* I see more than I am expecting as I meet more people. Solo travel is lonely and you want to speak to others, when you do you get new experiences. Theres nothing stopping you talk to people when you travel with others but the yearning for interaction isn’t as strong. Ex: meeting someone in Beijing and going for a proper local breakfast eating things I’d never imagined.

* It challenges me to overcome my comforts. I’ve experienced far more by pushing my boundaries beyond what I thought possible. Ex: cycling the US Pacific Coast and needing shelter/resources and accepting the help you can get only to find kind people, new experiences and great local recommendations.

Almost every time I share stories at least a couple of stories come out of times I have travelled solo.
Speaking of FakeYou and the subject at hand, we're building a 24/7 AI-powered news channel.

Super early demo: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1746464254

We've now got a whole news and studio setup and can tailor the news for your interests. I really do think cable news and news radio is heading towards irrelevancy.
How could it be 'right' to abidicate resposibility? If others do it, how will anything get done?

Claiming powerlessness is an excuse to avoid the stress of our times. Now, more than ever, people need to step up and take responsibility.
>>Third, if you switch all of our energy to nuclear today with a magic switch, we would run out of all easy to mine uranium in a few decades.

There are vast quantities of uranium in ocean water in concentrations that while low, still allow it to be extracted. More importantly, breeder reactors can harvest 100X more energy from uranium than currently deployed reactor types, and in the process eliminate all of the long-lasting nuclear waste, i.e. those with a half life of millions/billions of years.

With known supplies of uranium and thorium on Earth, nuclear fission can provide 100% of humanity's current energy needs for something like 2 billion years. For reference, the sun's rising luminosity is expected to boil Earth's oceans away in 900 million years. We could 1000X current energy consumption with nuclear, and have enough fuel on Earth for over a million years. Long before the fuel runs out, we will be able to exploit resources beyond Earth.
> when did the term come to popular usage? When was it “invented”?

Its always been somewhat less popular than “biological parents”, but its been in wide use since somewhere about the late 1970s, and it (or at least, the narrower form “birth mother”) was in use by the early 1950s at the latest.
Yeah, tell us something new.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655#Shootdown_...
It's more than just Covid. When interest rates are 0 it makes sense to spend a lot on R&D that will pay off in 10 years. When interest rates are 7% suddenly that might not make as much sense.

It's true Google management didn't foresee this issue but it's not like Google was an outlier. Everyone in the economy thought the same thing.
Most Google employees do not have median expenses or a clear path to getting there without drastically upending their lives.
The trick with the F is a good one. Yes, tokenization is very likely one of the contributing factors.

The point of the eval is an attempt to exercise: attention to detail, tokenization, ability to stop, ability to follow instruction and ignore irrelevant instructions, biases, laziness, computational limits, etc.
The current HN headline [0]makes it clear what this is, but the actual website makes it really difficult to understand what their value proposition is, other than “designed in Italy made from Egyptian yarn”

[0] “Clothing designed to confuse facial recognition software”
The first sentence of your comment was structured like this: [reason to use lead], but [reason to use tungsten]. At least I expected the second sentence to expand on the pros of tungsten, when in fact it was about the pros of lead; interpreting it as the former would mean lead is a hard material.
Because public transport other than planes is so atrophied in the US that no one even considers trains and buses.
It’s been a common term in my country for as long as I can remember so it might be cultural. I’d say “biological parents” has a more clinical connotation to it but would be just as easily interpreted.

Most commonly used by people who are adopted to refer to their biological parents (especially I would say if they have a relationship with them). I definitely wouldn’t view it as a woke term (I wouldn’t see how it would serve that demographic) unless it’s being used in a different way to the definition I posted earlier.

Reading the article it might have a new meaning which potentially refers to the parent who actually performs the birth? I still don’t think I’d consider that woke but I’ve never heard it in that context and would find it a confusing term since I’m used to the other definition.
" people with no vested interest in the system making decisions."

Opposed to the people with vested interest in the system, like the german emperor and russian tsar. Who made a big war for the benefit of everyone. Kings think in history grandeur, just like ordinary politicians. They just have more unchecked power, you should maybe try out north korea, I think they are the closest to being anti democratic.
I haven't seen any evidence that Friedman advocated short term profits over long term results.
Maybe the people laid off won’t lap up the corporate feel-good bullshit at their next job: We’re all a family. Employees come first. You matter to us. Management is here for you. “Don’t be evil.” “Move fast and break things.” Fake work-life balance double-speak.
Subtle slight degrees away from Know-Nothingism. The rejection of finding out, in favor of delusional certainty.
> the number one source of information of citizens should be real life experience with other citizens that they're actively learning from (their issues, grievances, etc with laws, political decisions, officials, etc) and collaborate with. Not the media.

How can the real life experiences of people I know possibly inform me about Ukraine, Chinese foreign policy, the SVB bailout, pandemic issues, etc. etc. etc.?
Unnecessary first paragraph on an otherwise great comment.
So, can someone clarify: if a laid off Googler is in hospital bed and they stay there after the deadline, they might go into debt (due to hospital prices)?
The problem here is that Samsung are marketing it as "look how amazing our 100x zoom is!" when in fact it's not 100x zoom, its 30x digital zoom and the results are misleading. The iPhone issue was pointing out how comparatively bad the iPhone processing is...
Venture Catastrophists
Such a big statement about someone who we know so little about.

But regardless of that, judging from the available works alone that is simply not true. Cases in point: Meno, the slave boy moment; the whole education project from the Republic.
Nobody you have really befriended (in real life for a long stable period) can't be your friend. No emmotional expession in commercials or other people towards you is genuine. Its all so they get what they want from you. Money or attention. Of course the random stranger you meet can be an exception.
But i never understood how people can fall in love with brands, (most) artists etc. There is no mutual feeling.
> unless you're of the mindset that red meat is inherently unhealthy

It's not a mindset, any more than gravity is a mindset.
Hosting a forwarding / redirect server instead of actually hosting images is probably a decent idea.

The K8s proxy is redirecting from only hosting on GCR to community-owned registries - https://kubernetes.io/blog/2023/03/10/image-registry-redirec...

You can view the code here - https://github.com/kubernetes/registry.k8s.io

But because everyone is already pointing at gcr.io (just like many openfaas users point at docker.io/) - they're having to do a huge campaign to announce the new URL - the same would apply with the author's solution here.

I wrote some automation for hosting (not redirects) in arkade with the OSS registry - Get a TLS-enabled Docker registry in 5 minutes - https://blog.alexellis.io/get-a-tls-enabled-docker-registry-...

The registry is also something you can run on a VM if you so wish, and have act as a pull through cache.

Apart from reliability - GitHub's container registry is the current next best option - but we have to ask ourselves, what happens when they start charging or the outages start to last longer or are more frequent than 1-2 times per week as we've seen in Q1 2023.
I just cant get a laptop i feel comfortable working on, they all have that slow feel, where a desktop is just crisp and i can always just switch out anything i dont like about the current build..
I can confirm. I'm regularly surprised how slow my iOS developers are at developing a few screens.
The reason why it’s qualified by people who are adopted is because people who aren’t would just refer to them as “parents” not “birth parents” since there is no need to make a distinction.

People who are adopted have two sets of parents so it’s used to distinguish who they are referring to.
Show HN: Find your total usage on GitHub Actions
> A few examples; the Titanic was never called unsinkable until after it sank, no one committed suicide on Black Friday as a result of the stock market crash, and there was no public panic caused by the original War of the Worlds radio broadcast. All of these things were reported by the media at the time.

Why should I believe you, a random person on the Internet?
> 1968 - USS Scorpion attack sub sank somewhere near the Azores Islands.

Hadn't really know about that, and I thought I knew lots of stuff about the Cold War.

Also, the Kursk incident that happened ~30 years later and which resulted in approximately the same number of victims (118 vs 99 for the Scorpion) was presented by the Western press as this cataclysmic event for Russia, an event that was proving that the Russian State was of no good, structurally speaking. For comparison, apparently the only thing that the West managed to create about the Scorpion sinking was a song, not even a Hollywood B movie.
I am a Google shareholder and an American. I would love if my country provided this kind of care, but it doesn't, and Google's public image profits from being able to step in when our government does not. Obviously, it because difficult for that image to perpetuate itself if it does things like this, so I wish for it to not do that.
I clicked the link hoping for a primary source talking about the different universities of their day, like a journal entry of a Medieval student. I was a little disappointed to see it's just a silly little thing with a peppering of historical revisionism. It's still kinda neat.
I am sorry for where you stand and I hope you can get to better times soon.
That said, I am really sorry but what you describe is NOT the world. It is the United States of America.
In Europe we’re having a hard time, but we have a lot in place that would have prevented for the most damaging things you listed to happen, for example you wouldn’t have had to take a second job to afford any medical bills, and you would have had more time to spend with your wife.
Contract laws would have prevented your house price increase in the EU.

Sorry if I could sound insensitive to you, but it’s about time that Americans understand that their personal problems are a societal-level issue. And that AMERICA /= the world.

You are not more of a loser than the other guy because of what you’re going through, and you shouldn’t be forced to power through or “soldier through” (see, it’s in the language even) to be ok. There should be a proper societal network ready to help you and to make sure that you can keep contributing to society.
Type safety, performance, more battle tested ecosystem just to mention a few points on why it's better than node.

Personally I would never trust JavaScript on backend.
I think you’ve missed the point of the comment.

The point is that these people aren’t making their money from what they’re preaching, they’re making it from YouTube.

Even if there were some validity to what they’re saying in the videos, if the video has 3 million views by the time you’ve watched it then you’re at least the 3 millionth fish in the packed-to-the-gills salmon farm by then and there’s no margin left for you.
I bought a 1kg tungsten cube
Just choose better news sources. Plenty are serious and high-consequence information - much more than I have time to read, in fact.
Sodarizer Spark
Two things to note:

No, indeed, if I see an extinction event in the distance future, I dont feel a need to act. It is hard to explain, but I dont feel responsible for human kind. Its a nice experiment, and I love to be part of it at the seemingly right time. But I dont go as far as investing personally regarding the future of humanity. If we make it (to wherever that would be), fine by me. If we dont, thats also totally fine...

Regarding the part that it is hard to keep up-to-date with current ML: thats true of course. However, what helps me here is that I feel like this is interesting, but not my field of work. Tinkering with free software was far more contagious, because I could do that literally at home, without wasting too much money.
ML is totally different. I could toy with tinyGPT, but that is effectively too tiny to be fun.
Once I scale up, I no longer can do stuff on my own. Sure, I could also order 1024 A100s from a cloud provider, but... that is going to bust my budget.
So in a sense, this makes me free from wanting to understand it all. Its totally OK for me to have a rough overview on how it works...
The easiest way to test how your app handles API errors
What facts are we talking about?

There are many consistent interpretations of reality and human experiences. An AI model trained on text and attempting to replicate human intelligence is not measuring or approaching some single objective reality.
Of all CEOs, Zuckerberg has the least to worry about in terms of his (imaginary) fiduciary duty to shareholders. The board and shareholders can’t fire him.

Stop internalizing corporate platitudes. The sooner you accept that the game is making money the sooner you can get yours and stop expecting your employer to owe you anything more than a paycheck for your work.
Globization is over and it'll cost you, TSMC's Chang
The startup industry is a great place for the people who are driven by money to prey on those that are idealistic, just like the game industry profits off of people who really like video games.
It's amazing how much we've regressed since Delphi.
I don't observe "maximum tolerable negativity". Could you give an example, maybe a link to a serious news website that looks this way?
I miss going fishing, I should go back to it. Thank you for sharing this!
Dangerous Android phone 0-day bugs revealed – patch or work around them now
Snare (System iNtrusion Analysis and Reporting Environment)
No pricing and no waitlist ...
There is also an Android build
Responded to who? I don't believe that and I also don't plan to treat any employee badly. My point is that it doesn't matter. Once your proposed civil war happens I will automatically be the bourgeoisie class that needs to be crushed, tortured and killed.
> Reading the article it might have a new meaning which potentially refers to the parent who actually performs the birth? I still don’t think I’d consider that woke but I’ve never heard it in that context and would find it a confusing term since I’m used to the other definition.

I see, another user commented about it possibly including "surrogacy", so that may be the explanation there.

Biological would more refer to those who provided the sperm & eggs, birth would refer to those who actually did the... birthing. The birth father would be the one in the relationship with the birth mother?
> His responses show he doesn't have any understanding of what he's doing to people and their families. If humans were robots who didn't need shelter, food, and care, okay I guess.

Anyone surprised that Zuckerberg seems devoid of empathy? The laid off people can live in the Metaverse until times get good again, right?
I might be being dense, but why not distribute the quantized files?
I don't think it's fair to assume that someone who writes a comment to tell you why they disagree with you, would also flag.
That’s called “visionary.”
That sounds great! Really hoping we can, we're still yet to find an alternative.
Remember how the universe works? It doesnt care about the well-being of individuals. Thats just a fact of life. Demanding equality of outcome was always an illusion, doubly so in the face of big changes.
This seems to prevent people from being detected by a generic object detector, but it doesn’t seem obvious that it will actually confuse a face detector… it might however confuse an autonomous vehicle, wouldn’t wear this in the street
Wouldn't exactly call it "grill".

He gave adulting answers and is business adulting more these days.

Don't see anything wrong the questions or with his answers.
>Japan is vastly better situated than South Korea or China for what's about to happen

Depends how better situated is defined.

Advanced economies like JP, SKR or TW (and most of EU) with relatively maxed out human capital (~80% skilled workforce) are undergoing net demographic decline that will stagnate/contract their economies while accumulating increasingly onerous welfare commitments.

Versus PRC, whose only at ~25% skilled workforce, with lots of poor before rich aging cohorts that will be replaced by more productive newer generations, still has vast development + economic headroom even with less net population. Meanwhile poor before rich cohorts = expectation of welfare less demanding - many do not expect much in the first place. Hence most poor in PRC have high homeownership and household savings rate to weather the lack of anticipated state support (96% in poorer rural regions). They're vastly different scenarios to manage politically - average PRC retiree is going to have to suffice with much less vs retiree from an advanced economy, but that's expected from old before rich societies. Or just plain not rich societies, i.e. most societies throughout history.

But where PRC is vastly better situated, than just about anyone, including immigration heavy advanced economies, at any time in recorded human history, is PRC workforce trending from 25% skilled workforce to 70-80% over next decades - generations of high skill demographic dividend and high-value economic development is JUST starting in PRC. Quick napkin math, PRC will be recomposing the current 750M workforce with ~200M skilled to shrunken 700M workforce but with 450-550M skilled (+250-300M). For reference, current JP is like 55M skilled out of 70M workforce, demographic decline will lead to economic contraction. Also consider 2000 PRC GDP ~1T @ ~2M STEM grads, 2022 GDP ~18T @ ~17M STEM. Projected 2030 STEM @ ~50M, likely topout ~80-100M @ 2050. That's 4-5 extra current JPs worth of growth left, which will increase capacity to weather demographic decline from baseline, which might still be low relatively, but again, that's an entirely different demographic/political situation to engineer around.

The TLDR is many advanced economies are in net demographic decline with increasingly onerous welfare requirements, vs PRC has massive high skilled demographic dividend to buffer net demographic decline from old/poor cohorts on their way who also has savings to retire meagrely because they simply don't expect much from state in the first place. IMO person is better situated to retire in the former, but a governance better situated to manage in the latter.
It’s both much more expensive and more time consuming to have a child today compared to <60s.
> Not to mention no one Google lays off is going to have any trouble finding a job paying at least the median wage.

While feeding a newborn or dealing with serious illness?

That’s the point. You’re on a leave for a reason. You don’t expect the leave to be unilaterally canceled.

Not to mention that, if you’re an immigrant, you have visa problems as well.
Snark is not really welcome on this, the situation can be much more complex than you state. The article makes it clear that there are different categories "parents" and "birth parents". Also, "parents" is plural. (in your example that might include "fathers")

My cousin is a parent by adoption to two and is a very good mother to a family. The children also have birth parents and while they have never been in contact, the children are in contact with their siblings who were adopted by other families and meet up regularly. They also know their birth-grandparents.
Who needs plebs? I mean, a couple of thousand. Maybe, But beyond that?
Great site, thanks! Improvement idea: please use SVGs instead (or in addition to) GIFs. It should be relatively easy, much better quality, probably smaller image file sizes.