skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
About three months for long lived tokens in my experience. My recommendation would be to use them weekly.
It's not a co-founder if it doesn't have votes. If it has votes, what makes you think GPT-4 and you will always agree how to vote your shares? It's not a silent partner either since its a chat bot :} So it's an adviser.

I think the question you could ask is whether having a co-founder (with all the +/-) brings something critical to the equation that an adviser, however knowledgeable, does not.

[p.s. above is ignoring the standing issue of a hallucinating chat bot, which is an entirely different issue.]
Not really, as you will notice and learn that the ropes are damn stiff and have metal ties to form the grid.
I was there too and, at first, was wondering if the music thing was just a warm up to the main talk. But soon enough I settled into the flow of it.

His slides were incredibly minimal throughout and then, at the end, he played a video of maple leaf rag pouring forth from his player piano midi setup and it was like choirs of angels singing.

How many boring ass talks have I sat through that I’ll never remember — but I suspect I’ll remember his talk for a long long time.
Then they also need to be charging these apps regulatory fees to cover the additional inspections.
Not sure what you mean.

But at any rate, Wayland is completely optional. You can keep running X and nobody will stop you. People will keep running X without issue for a very long time. This is very different from what the Apple world is like.
If you'll refresh your memory about the context of this comment thread, you will see several posters using past-tense to refer to historical situations and that is the context into which you interjected your thing about panko. I assumed that you knew that panko had once been made that way and was no longer. Others may have assumed that as well, given the established context and the way you wrote the sentence.

So I hope this clears it up for everyone.

Thanks.
FDE does not protect against malware
A more parameter LLM is basically a new model that you have to train from scratch. You can't pick up say GPT3 and turn it into Chinchilla-grade LLMs with 175B params with just the difference in training between the two. The former has "converged" and more effort and money put into it would bring negligible benefits. The progress is basically reaching an asymptote.

And of course there is nothing saying future progress won't make a new model that can learn on the go. But right now, the transformer structure that made LLMs such a huge thing is inherently incapable of learning from its own output. Or at least, it isn't really feasible with how demanding the cost to it would be.
Zemlyane – Grass Near Home
Building my /now page using Eleventy
No, the models are quite different. Ask Bing chat to write you a letter and it'll say no. Chatgpt will do tasks like this quite happily.
These Atom games bring back memories! Although I'm pretty sure Wampus was also one of the programs listed in a companion book to the "Atomic Theory and Practice" manual as well.
Well done tool, thanks!

I used the system fonts at https://scrabble-solver.org and got a small performance improvement (from ~70% to ~80%) in PageSpeed Insights on mobile.

Noticeably it got my Largest Contentful Paint down from ~3.5s to ~2.2s.
Thanks for the clarification/correction.

It seems crazy to me some rules are so relaxed.

I remember asking if there were any limits on where they could flight their experimental planes, say urban/densely populated areas, the answer was "nah".
The argument is not about government intervention per se, but about hypocrisy -> it's somehow okay for Government to bail out banks, but not students/school meals for kids/any other cause for the common man
This why there are settings for this sort of things. Nobody in this thread is saying that something was impossible, just that some settings had to be changed and the UX was suboptimal.
When all you have is a hammer, nothing looks like low cost continuous solar power with direct conversion to electricity at the poles.
Imagine a defense lawyer at a death penalty trial making an argument like this. "I implore you to consider the possibility that my client is sentient whereas the person he murdered is a p-zombie." The jury would deliberate for less than 5 minutes before convicting
If it is not the default behavior then I agree with you.
I spotted a user on the FT with that handle, and asked if they were the eponymous one.

They didn't reply.

But just in case you're reading this, person/people/AIs behind n-gate, you are sorely missed.

That is all.
LessWrong and its roots in “rationalism” are consistently fooled by these kinds of scarecrow fears. Here’s why this argument is misguided:

1. There is no singular notion of “alignment” and (IMHO) AGI at all. Humans have been misaligned with each other, through war, debate, disagreement, and so on. AI is more in danger of being “ “misaligned” to one group’s needs than to the overarching totality of humanity. Focusing on the possibly more mundane concerns of who gets privileged access to guide the AI, what it deems to be “accurate” and correct knowledge, etc. is much more important to our shared future with AI tools, at least to me.
2. LW almost always ignores the “second order” effects, “snowball melting” that occurs once anything becomes more powerful and centralized. At the moment at which AI seems to have access to too many levers and dials on taking action, it will certainly run into the kinds of limitations that we would run into. Want an AI to create a super bomb that can annihilate us? Good luck getting Uranium, setting up extraction facilities, avoiding detection from governments. Want to create an AI super-trader that becomes infinitely wealthy? Good luck competing against other AI traders that bring arbs down to zero.
3. I think the most salient thing here is that an AI that has the power and capability to enact massive change will almost certainly need to organize large scale human help. And at that point, I would not characterize this effort to destroy humanity as one purely “AI”-created. It would require enlisting a multitude of people desiring this “omnicide”, and human hands will be bloody as well.
You are trying to optimize the cost of something that doesn’t need cost optimizing.

“Hey boss, shall I spend a week to reduce the cost of a low volume $1000 device by $2? Or shall I reuse stuff that we already have?”

As for the RFID part: I’ve been involved in creating setups for a production environment. You want to avoid an operator to make decisions because they will mistakes otherwise. The RFID solution is elegant and prevents an operator from accidentally cooking a $1000 device.
But Rolls Royce is a nuclear company, Pratt and Whitney is not.
Yeah or look at pig behavior how much intelligence and emotions do they demonstrate is remarkable. Or how mother cows will cry for days after being separated from their calves. We also already have a very hard time combating racism and that's against other human beings, even more difficult to teach them empathy towards other species.
that's exactly what has me worried about AGI. AGI is going to supercharge the already sociopathic profit-seeking of corporations. it's legitimately terrifying me.
Cool, now do it on a conveyor belt!

https://youtu.be/xUjcHW7SHaI
Don’t trust the news media? That’s good
Most people won't. And if you're developing software distributed to others, this will put your machine in a state where you aren't testing what your end users get.
I've been slowly working through the Stephen Mraz "Build a RISC-V OS In Rust" project to familiarize myself with RISC-V and it's been a pretty enlightening experience.

One issue that I've run into though, which is also noticeable in this article, is that a lot of things like ISA extensions are specified in either repos that don't show a diff vs the main spec, or are just inline in the massive PDF. What's the point of linking specifically to the "Ztso" extension if it's just going to download the main ISA specification.

Wasm faces a similar issue, with lots of fork repos for extensions that don't at all outline how the extension operates or changes the core.

It makes me long for "HTML (single page)" in the GNU tradition.
Agriculture moves a fair amount of data around. You probably don't need 25 Mbit today, but need more than the ancient infrastructure can supply. The infrastructure being built to be capable of closing the latter gap is able to handle much more both for reasons of accommodating future needs and simply where the technology is now for modern installations.

And for that reason, as a farmer, I can get gigabit service on my farms, but where I live in an urban area where the infrastructure isn't as old and is still moderately capable I am topped out at 50 Mbit service.
College students built a satellite with AA batteries and a $20 microprocessor
Don't worry, you're fired.
Working with 1000 tests on a stable C++ library
There absolutely has been a ton of government money funneled to, basically Verizon and Comcast shareholders to try and provide rural Internet service via the Telecomms Act of 1996 along with everything else that came after that. That the government hasn't been getting good value for its money, and 75%, and at only 25 Mbit, compared to 97% for electricity is a whole other topic.
It would, so long as you're aware that the password has to be strong.

Let's quantify that. The default KDF that keepassx uses is iirc ~50ms seconds of computation on modern hardware. It might dynamically determine the KDF rounds based on your system, but it never updates it (hmm, is that a vuln as well?) so it'll be old either way. A GPU gets a ~thousand-fold speed-up compared to CPU for pbkdf2, so let's say 20k guesses per second per GPU (note: this is just a ballpark number). An attacker might have a dozen GPUs available and care to spend a month on your vault (does that sound like a fair upper bound? Tweak it for your personal threat model), which means they run through some log(20e3 guesses_per_second × 12 gpus × (3600×24×31) seconds)/log(2) ≃ 40 bits of entropy.

If you pick random words from a diceware-sized dictionary (7776 words), you need 4 random words to be secure (because log(7776⁴)/log(2)>40). If you pick random characters from a-z,A-Z,0-9, you need a 7-character randomly generated password (because log(62⁷)/log(2)>40).

Edit: it looks like KeepassX has stopped development and says to use KeepassXC now. Their source code has some mentions of Argon2id so this may be outdated advice! Your password/-phrase may be able to be shorter than this, but it'll be hard to quantify because all Argon2 crackers suck ("For Argon2, the fastest cracking software that I can find is a CPU implementation." I wrote two years ago in https://security.stackexchange.com/a/249384/10863).
This is also strong: "Web3 is a flaming pile of feces orbiting a giant dripping hairball."
If anyone in the household works from home, that 8 will be totally saturated by a single video meeting. If there are young kids that want to watch netflix, two parents needing to work, and if you're a developer who has to pull docker images or download a large file, God help you. I have 35 Mbps now and it still gets very painful sometimes.
> Why would an AGI (malevolent or otherwise) risk war when there's an entire galaxy[1] they can explore and countless planets full of resources that they could use?

Just taking this point, the AGI will hardly be able to leave Earth to explore the galaxy when humans oppose that, or aren’t willing to provide the necessary resources to get that project started (which doesn’t seem unlikely). The AGI may judge that the easier and overall less risky option will be to get rid of humanity (it’s not difficult to get them to kill each other anyway) and take control over the Earth first.
No need for linux. There's the helloSystem[1], a FreeBSD-based macOS clone...

[1] https://hellosystem.github.io/docs/
I wouldn't say infrastructure is worthless, more that infrastructure creates new market opportunities, and without it, markets just won't function well. For example, good roads allow farmers to transport their produce to distant markets in all weather conditions, good electricity distribution means farmers start buying washing machines, better broadband means rural people might start buying online services and so on.

Trying to game basic infrastructure for profits runs counter to this notion, and it's thus an area of the economy where government management makes the most sense.
An admin check tells the OS that you are an admin, not that you know what the software does and that you are ok with CoolWallpapers logging all inputs.
I wonder where his animosity towards Hillary Clinton came from, I guess we will never know.
> The point of calling it a proxy war by the Kremlin is not to make it seem larger than it, as the largest post-WW2 European war, is. It is to invert the responsibility fot aggression. (Secondarily, it’s to deny Ukrainian agency and make the existence and sovereignty an irrelevancy in discussing a war where that is the entire issue.)

Yes, that's what I meant. The purpose of this talking point is to diminish Ukrainian achievements by leaving an impression that Russia is under attack and fighting the whole "collective West" (as they call it) and that the war is much larger in scope than it actually is: Russia vs Ukraine.

Foreign military aid to Ukraine has so far barely sustained defense and I wouldn't call aiding countries belligerents in this war.
Accidental Tech Podcast is a good mix of informative and entertaining. Daring Fireball is also a regular listen for me for similar reasons.

For both of these, I like that the hosts are clearly biased.
You're right. 'jobs becoming obsolete' is the least of our worries. You have to look two steps ahead at the writing on the wall.
> institution known for Swiss stability

Hah!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_Suisse#Controversies
I always wondered - was it pronounced “loft” or “low fat”?

“elephant”?
> FSD10 is good enough to drive 98% of journeys and 11 looks closer to 99%.

That is really not very good at all. If I take 4 trips a day (home to work, work to home, drive to pick up kids from school, drive home) that means I get into a car accident once a month.

This is all just very irrelevant from the main point which is that Elon routinely makes highly dubious statements about the future.
FT is heavily paywalled, including this version of the article. It would not be able to be read linking only the source.

Even my bypass paywalls options cant overcome most of FTs blocks at times.

https://archive.is/2023.03.16-111653/https://www.ft.com/cont...
Or multiple machines. There are about 31k seconds in a year. 3.1 seconds per iteration seems already slow as a response time to unlock a db so it's about one year for those 10000 attempts. Split it between 10 machines by first digit, it's down to a little more than one month. Split it between 100 machines by the first two digits and it's down to half a week.

A four digit PIN is poor security. What Bitwarden could do is removing that feature.
> And at that point, I would not characterize this effort to destroy humanity as one purely “AI”-created. It would require enlisting a multitude of people desiring this “omnicide”, and human hands will be bloody as well.

Why would a super intelligence require humans?
> the far more serious alignment problem we have is the one we’re currently running 24/7: maximizing profit with no regard for externalities

That's more well-known rather than more serious. It's basically why the Communist Manifesto was written.

"Money" is basically a really good approximation for what we really care about, and the difference between it and what matters — the reason Bhopal/Union Carbide[0] is seen as a disaster rather than a legitimate cost of doing business — is that law and other interventions are able to update and respond at a "close enough" rate.

AI might still be slow enough, if humans are in the loop.

An agentic AI (definitely including GOFAI[1], not just LLMs or future tech AGI/ASI) not so much.

Even where it's aligned, you get weird problems just because there's less chance to do investigate journalism before disasters happen:

Imagine an alternate reality where 9/11 didn't happen in 2001, and in 2030 a pure AI business starts and operates a substantial lights-out cyanide factory in central Manhattan that nobody even notices because it's all done carefully and safely right up until 2031/09/11 because that is this hypothetical alternative reality version of the terror attacks, and in this case those attacks rip apart the factory and spread the cyanide over much of the city.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal_disaster

[1] https://analyticsindiamag.com/8-real-life-examples-algorithm...
More like 5 minutes. Install the extensions for your programming languages and frameworks of choice (who conveniently embed LSP), learn Cmd+Maj+P to get the global command palette, and start working.
I don't think programming careers are/will be over.

1. The latest model is nowhere close to taking in the number of lines of code in internal projects, so will be difficult to understand the design of those systems.

2. Companies developing software would be wary of sending internal code and trade secrets to the ChatGPT servers.

3. Languages, APIs, protocols, etc. evolve over time, so ChatGPT would need to keep up and handle the specific versions you are using internally. For example, Java POJOs vs record classes. Or even internal limitations like lack of runtime type information for things like embedded devices.

4. Experiments I've seen relied on external tests being in place to check the validity of the output (e.g. implementing the Promise JavaScript API), and the output had test failures that ChatGPT wasn't able to fix when told about them. -- I'd expect ChatGPT to get better at this specific example, by being fed these uses of ChatGPT in the training data, but I don't expect it to do better when shown novel specifications/requirements.

----

There are various design decisions that go into creating software that often have different trade offs. Like when implementing a compiler, you can stop on the first error, but developing a language plugin for an IDE you need to be able to recover from and handle incorrect or incomplete input.

There are also things like the way you structure the code, like creating DAO/POJO/etc. wrappers for database/JSON/XML/etc. objects, or providing APIs that fit into the style of the language you are implementing them in.

It would be interesting to see how ChatGPT handles something like implementing a HTML parser when given the WHATWG specs, or a keyboard driver given the keyboard specs and the driver API docs.
Yes, linking to specific specifications can be a pain once they've been added to the main ISA doc. Perhaps I'd be better off linking to the raw .tex, but that's not always particularly readable or as I think you suggest, not bother linking at all if the link isn't directly to the mentioned extension.
ChatGPT is like online office hours with the internet
Got to fly in an A-22 Foxbat in AZ. You rotate immediately on applying power. In Sedona with a decent headwind we were off the ground at 22kts. Took us a bit more than 22ft but not much, that's for sure.

Tiny little go kart of a plane with a lawnmower engine (rotax) engine attached.
Maybe I'm being naive - but we're still all talking about Large language models, right? There haven't been any breakthroughs on actual artificial reasoning? Actual sentience? This is the appearance of intelligence. That obviously has its own massive problems, but we're not practically any closer to a "Superintelligence" that could actually be reasoned with.

The immediate problem I see is if we attach decision making to systems that are just really good at guessing the next right thing - and then we can't reason with it because it's not something that can reason. Except we don't realize because it gives the appearance of reasoning.
I don't think GP said anything about making demands. They said they avoid using that piece of software and that is not a demand on the software's author.
Bank runs are psychological in modern times; my next worry is that the news machine has begun to nibble on midsize banks, so that may be the next victim that gets devoured for content.
Ask HN: Why don't alarms gradually increase volume so you can plug your ears?
You could even use this approach for shared landline phones where family members want the phone to ring at different volume levels.
That's likely why the offer is so low. The $1B doesn't go toward covering any potential losses. The $1B would go to Credit Suisse shareholders and then UBS would own the company and be on the hook for the liabilities. To put it another way, the deal's complete price is $1B in cash plus whatever the liabilities are.
Theres some reasoning about that here (with citations)

https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revol...

Edit: Or here actually https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revol...
I don't know much about Switzerland but their flag is a big plus.
> That construction was not used here.

Except that is how "was" was used by the two people you were responding to.
Same in Poland
current gpt4 interface is pull not push, so you ask question and it would respond. if we can automate it further to make it context aware and also able to take or initiate actions it would be a game changer.

when the day comes I am willing to have AI as a cofounder or advisor as legally applicable. in fact I am more comfortable sharing ideas with bot which does not judge me or remember every of my past failures or behaviours like how humans do.
Exactly. Pick one and do it. The structure of society is incompatible with human welfare.
Next time you deploy to production, remove the references to websockets you have on develop.

That website looks totally scammy BTW. It reminds me of something similarly scammy I saw on Reddit yesterday. Dreamsands, anyone?
Or they go directly to your memory and retrieve all necessary info to access your accounts
That is part of the false narrative you and many were fed and believed. Assange repeatedly explained that documents you are referring to were leaked from someone inside and alluded without exposing that the source could have been Seth Rich who was shot in the street.
There are a few other large banks that have also their lot of challenges. At this stage, as you say, it is an irrational panic. CS was well capitalised by any modern standard and it would have required massive losses before creditors and depositors were seriously exposed. But no bank can resist a large enough bank run.
I'd understand completely if they were up against regular western-style industrial farming operations: I can farm this land traditionally, the soil is okay, there's money to be made, it works, that new idea is a risk, who knows what the future will bring, and oh Monsanto mailed me a coupon, how nice.

But they're up competing against the desert. Who has a commercial interest in keeping the desert the way it is, besides some tourist industries around the pyramids in Egypt? Shouldn't it be trivial to convince people? "Hey, you have this land that is a desert where nothing grows, would you like to turn it into a food forest that'll feed you and offer you shade and make you loads of cash?" might induce some skepticism initially, but when you can point to their neighbor who's had a huge success with it, shouldn't everyone just jump on it?

Are these desert-projects commercial and they're asking for large fees to work on them? That'd make sense to explain why they aren't spreading like wild fire, but at least from the videos most of them seem like friendly plant hippies that get a huge kick out of restoring land, so I don't know -- is that just a sales pitch?
I am now on a quest to create the long lost Uniscuit...