skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This isn't an instance of a random person arbitrarily deciding to define fascism in a way that doesn't expressly adhere to the concept of "historical fascism".

Mxkopy is explicitly quoting Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia and adhering to the definition posited by Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari, and Michael Foucault. If you're unfamiliar with the work, I can understand the confusion, but he's clearly using the term appropriately given that context—not arbitrarily changing the definition to "mean... whatever you want it to mean".
Actually, that sounds like the literal textbook definition of a rumor to me
100% agree. There are some libraries like https://amoffat.github.io/sh/ that aim to make that easier, but they always have some quirks that, funnily enough, are often the corner cases you were hitting in your complicated Bash script in the first place.
We are hearing from trolls and astroturf bots that 15 minute cities are a deep state plot.
> a few unlucky scapegoats

By which you mean the shareholders and lenders. Out of all possible evils, this is probably the best.
... and they make an app called "Data Guardian 7"
Vinegar has no issues with livestreams. I haven't tested Yattee, but it is being actively developed. Please report any bugs on the github page https://github.com/yattee/yattee
> with the common man absorbing the losses.

Most of your comment seemed reasonable, if a tad speculative given a lack of insider knowledge. But the last part feels like unnecessarily searching for a class warfare argument.

To date, said execs have lost their equity, and liabilities have been transferred. It remains to be seen if any more losses will be absorbed, and by whom and how much.

A counter argument is that a bunch of bank runs will destroy the "common man" and small businesses a lot more than folks parking money in hedge funds. The FDIC insurance pool works fine for a small number of regional banks, but it really is not that large.
Our blog (where blockchain articles are published every week) has helped us to get more clients and it has also helped people to get more into Blockchain and that world, you can check it out: https://www.ratherlabs.com/blog
You seem to be repeating nothing more than rumors you're unsure of.

If you claim VCs were demanding portfolio companies use svb, then let's hear names. I've raised money from multiple VCs and that's never been even hinted at.

We used svb because I've used Chase in the past. I know a bunch of stories that I'm not interesting in sharing publicly, but they're terrible. Here's one public story about what the "service" at Chase is like: the morons lost an updated phone number and almost shut down a small business with kyc inquiries dropped on them day of: https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1635083618380025858

The value of svb to us was they were a bank with a glowing rep, glowing ratings, good service when we called and asked for stuff, albeit with not particularly good software.
It’s not like they’re synonyms. There’s overlap and maybe even category theory is a superset. But the experience of working with them is different.
Well, for instance, I had two microphones, an Audio Technical AT4040 and an Audio Technical AE5400, and I wasn't sure which I preferred to use as a vocal mic while I am playing piano. I asked it to compare and contrast. It was very helpful. I double-checked the results, but even with that, it was still much faster and less painful than doing two separate google searches dealing with ads. I went through the same exercise with all my other mics, too.

It also gave me advice on how to mic an upright bass when playing live in a room with other players. I consider its advice superior to advice I had earlier received from discussion boards. It also gave me microphone recommendations that I can research.

I also described a scenario of how my Focusrite Clarett8pre wasn't sending sounds to my headphones until I also turned on my Profile 2626, which is connected via optical ADAT cables. It told me that it sounded like the connection between the two was impeding the Focusrite's ability to route the inputs to my headphone mix, and to check Focusrite Control to see how the routing was defined. It wasn't a complete answer, but it put me on the right track.
>Why do you believe such a thing exists in the U.S.?

Because it exists for every civilization and essentially every system. The U.S. is not inherently exceptional in this regard.

And, yes, MAD is plausible and also a strong deterrent. But a central crux of the theory is that the system is inhabited by rational agents. Humans can even be modeled as rational agents most of the time, but I don't believe they adhere to this model all of the time. Behavioral psychology seems to bear this out.
Are we reading the same history books and watching the same global news events? Hope isn't the strategy that's going to get us through this crises.
Not a supercomputer, but heavy metal: I have a sun 4/490 [1] carcass on my porch that i got in similar circumstances. Never actually powered it up, but it donated a lot of hardware to later systems. Actual metal bits hardware, disk racks and i carved up the power supplies and some other stuff for parts.

The rack is still a favored spot for cats to sun themselves, 20+ years on.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun-4
Yeah tech workers should unionize. Any effort otherwise is dumb as fuck.

I have watched engineers consistently automate themselves out of a job and didn't even have the foresight to update their resume because they over inflated their own self value to the company.

Hint: You are about as valuable as your tech companies building's custodian crew. Tech companies know their burn rates, why do you think they stay close to campuses like Berkley? Plenty of fresh blood to burn through.
So how do all the bikes get into central London?
Instead of the final code which may or may not have time saved from chatgpt, it would be more interesting to see your chat history for that specific conversation with it and see how easily or poorly it understood what was needed, and how close to the actual end result it got.
People will definitely pay it given how pervasive Apple Card Monthly Installments are.

I use this program myself despite (now) being able to purchase all of my Apple gear upfront. Why pay now when I can pay over time at 0% interest?

As for this iPad, I definitely plan on upgrading to the OLED version, even at this price.

My 12.9" iPad Pro has been my primary work computer since November. It replaced my M1 MacBook Pro full-time (in fact, I traded in the MacBook for the iPad and a Magic Keyboard).

At the moment, it is mostly a dumb terminal into my Mac mini at home, which I connect into with Tailscale. (Tailscale is amazing; highly highly recommend it for anyone who wants to do this.).

As long as I have an internet connection, I'm able to do almost everything I used to do with my MacBook. In fact, I can do more, since I can write on the screen (FANTASTIC for demos and presentations) and detach it from the keyboard during flights or use it on a seatback really comfortably.

All signs point to this as being a temporary problem. I'm expecting to be able to do _everything_ I could do on my Pro in a few years. Zoom is a little annoying (I can share my screen, but I can't remote into people screens, which, fortunately, I don't need to do as often nowadays), I wish I could use external mics, and...struggling to think of anything else.

The display on the mini-LED iPad Pro is great, but there is visible blooming around UI elements when you use it in dark areas, which is really annoying. I could imagine this being a deal-breaker for anyone that depends on color accuracy.
Meth is powerful and apparently common in Thailand. That said, the scrap dealer ought to be informed and quickly run the other direction when a tweaker walks in with a radiation source.
I highly recommend this blog: https://www.ratherlabs.com/blog
faith is open loop,

> I wouldn't run anything that matters open-loop.
> If even the Swiss can't keep it together financially we're in real trouble.

Eventually all financialized systems go the way of the dodo bird.

The Republic of Genoa is the classic example for this, as they had made their fortunes via trade (including slave trade) starting with the 1200s, but by the 1500s almost all of their wealth-creation had started to rely on providing "financial" services. And then they crashed. I'm also of the opinion that the UK's problems are caused by the same phenomenon, that's why they have never quite recovered from the 2008-2010 global financial crisis.

Afaik Switzerland is not yet a fully financialized economic system but it's certainly up there. The future will be interesting for them.
I never had another interpreter that I had to learn by manually fuzzing it. AppleScript makes bash look like F#.
> The management has so completely screwed up that they don't deserve a job.

These companies aren't employing fortune tellers, no one really knew what the future held when the pandemic hit. It was extremely reasonable to think that there was a chance that big tech's market size would massively increase. Even if that chance was only 10% the correct management decision is hiring as if it will happen and then laying people off in the case it doesn't, because catching up is hard, but firing people is easy.
I was stuck on a bug for half a day. Even ChatGPT couldn't solve it. The next day, I get access to GPT-4. I put the code in, describe the expected behavior I want, and describe the actual buggy behavior I'm getting. GPT-4 gave me the solution immediately.

I'm definitely not considering this to be a low-value "toy". This is powerful stuff.
Teeth Track Gender Bias Back over 1k Years
>.... so shout “I’ll pass on your (left/right)”

That will do.
It's basically no different than "fresh" or "organic" on grocery labels. Apparently the FDA does put some limitations on "fresh," while the USDA puts limitations on "organic" [1]. I'm not sure we even have an equivalent agency in our industry - maybe NIST? I agree it would be a nice regulation, but I think that horse has long left the barn, and it's not like you'll get to compel companies to change their name, so you'd just be left with some more regulatory capture as OpenAI keeps their name while new companies can't abuse the same bait-and-switch trick.

[0] https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfr...

[1] https://www.ams.usda.gov/about-ams/programs-offices/national...
Why wouldn't they be standing ready to make billions of dollars while being shielded from legal action?
I would take the pay cut and use the working hours to get prepared for future tech interviews. In any case, I guess you don’t want to work for them anymore.
For me it's a mix of internet searches with an expert system you can interact with in natural language.

So while before you'd simply type "my microphone is broken and I hear hissing noises" and pray Google had the answer to a more or less exact match for your question, now you type the same and ChatGPT can tell you possible causes. But then you refine your question "no, I tried this and that's not it. My mike brand is X, and it's a bit dusty. Anything else I should try?". New answer by ChatGPT. "No, I tried that and that's not it. But now I remember my dog bit it, is dog saliva bad for the mike?", and so on and so forth.

And it can do magic that Google cannot. Say you ask for a snipper of code in Java. Then you realize you want to see the solution in Python. "Please rewrite the code you just generated but in Python" -- and voilà!
I suspect for a long time, that high-sensitivity is the same as ADD. All filters wide open, especially for noise. Lookout/Scout? For sure. Nack in tribal times it was an asset, to have individuals who sleept long and stayed up late, saved up to 150 lives in case of emergency. Nowadays it is work, to find a niche to thrive in. Meditation and Ritalin might help you, being able to experience noise in a different way. A the best.
In a democracy, this means that people in aggregate need to care more about climate change consequences in the future than wealth/disposable income right now.

That is simply a hard sell, always has been, and most of us are to blame for the consequences...
people report that actually clicking the summarized foreign discussions did nothing
What guardrails prevent me from using it to generate hate speech?

I know why you say this, but it annoys me so much.

Do you blame the hammer, or the fist wielding it? Without gpt, people can still spew hate too.
I think it's still worth releasing even if it's not as good as someone else's. Worst-case scenario, you're growing and learning and putting something out there that demonstrates you're developing interesting software. And who knows, maybe you'll find some other contributors, or maybe this will spark some novel ideas in someone else. You never know the power of your contributions.

Don't gatekeep yourself!
I'm a big fan of rubber-ducking, but rubber ducks don't have a way of summarizing advice that is "out there" that I don't know about.
This is Bing Chat in a duck.
On paper, UBS gets 35bn of CET1 + 16bn from the AT1 write off, for 3bn.

You would have to believe the assets are massively mismarked for this to be off. I am not aware that it is the claim made against CS. The claim against CS I understand is not being able to turn a profit and large mishaps. Not the same thing as a bad book.
I'm no doctor, nor am I a psychologist, so I can't easily pick out good sources for this topic. All I remember is this particular story hitting the news and really resonating with me (mostly because I have an irrational reaction to spiders myself, though "fear" may not be the right term).

There are 83 works on Google Scholar citing the paper I linked above: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=1525421616690417423...

I'm not qualified to judge these papers nor their journals, but some of them may serve as a jumping off point for your own research if you're interested! Some papers seem to revolve around general state-of-mind biases ("Human safety and risk management"), while others focus on more concrete links such as biases in perception of "interpersonal distance".
Does anyone pay these people for their awesome work ?

Every time I see their progress in a such undocumented space, my jaw drops. Huge respect.
> I don't see why tasks couldn't be devided up and given a value and people get paid for completing it. Some would be easier, and some would be harder and worth more. I might not be a veteran developer, but from what I see this could work.

It would not work because the scenario you describe would amount to seeing "all your productivity evaporate into a never-ending haggle over tasks." Also you presume that you can be good at estimation and assigning "value," but everyone actually sucks at that. That's not to say that no one can accurately estimate anything, it means everyone sucks at estimating when it really matters. Your idea also kneecaps your ability to delegate, and motivates pay-later kinds of corner cutting.
> What guardrails prevent me from using it to generate hate speech?

Honestly, who gives a shit? Humans can do this already.
That's my plan should the EU ever mandate a 30km/h speed limit in cities.

If I'm gonna move slowly, might as well do it in style.
> ...and the industry believed them for years.

Did they?

From the outset, people pretty unanimously called bullshit on the metaverse and ridiculed Zuckerberg. Facebook's own advertising of the metaverse wasn't even ever designed to attact users, it was very obviously designed to make people think there were revenue sources buried in the multiverse. They never had a product or even a particularly coherent idea for one.
This quote tickled me the most - His curious IRL appearance — of a human designed by a computer or of a Styrofoam cup that a wizard decided to turn into a person but then changed his mind about halfway through — adapts unexpectedly well to the Meta-cartoonization algorithm

All in all a great bit of writing and commentary on something shit. The metaverse.
Equity means statistically very little in a startup. The chance of any startup succeeding where “success” means that the investors don’t lose money is 1 out of 10. The chance of a qualified person who takes a below market compensation in exchange for “equity” not being better off by working for one of the public tech companies is even slimmer.
Sincere, not kiss-ass question here: are they low-key becoming the best communicators in the Linux world? Or are there equally well-documented projects that just aren't getting the same heat for whatever reason?
Is there any evidence that OpenAI (or any of the big tech companies) are pushing for AI regulation? Seems to me like they instead using it as an excuse to keep all the details as a trade secret, despite their name.
There was a question last week about mark-to-mark accounting for banks in the wake of the SVB failure. The question was (to paraphrase): why aren't banks forced to mark every asset for every financial statement. This article pretty comprehensively describes why such a thing is not really possible, let alone desirable.

In regards to this article, I have to laugh at the asset managers holding cocos who thought that they were trading pseudo-warrants. I respect the shamelessness of these guys to try and blame other people for their own mistakes -- a lot of portfolio managers were successfully able to convince investors that their losses during the GFC were due to the ratings or govt agencies -- but they're not going to convince the central banks to eat the losses on this one. There is absolutely no incentive to make Swiss taxpayers eat tens of billions of losses because some fund manager didn't read the literal name of the instrument he was buying.
I see people complain about Micro-USB in various places, and am not quite sure what the problem is. You're connecting to some relatively small, low-power device, not powering a beefy laptop. Is it problematic to have too many cables in the drawer that fit?
Is your company experiencing rocketship growth or are you at the point where your growth has stabilized to a modest figure? It's probably best to pursue growth over cost savings, if possible. But not every company is in a position where a few more features can double revenue.

Still, I think it's hard to justify going anti-cloud in an effort to cut costs. Without a very skilled and experienced team doing the migration, the end result is very likely to be some hybrid setup that's the worst of both worlds. Especially if you're using a managed service, the open source alternatives might not be the drop in replacement that they claim to be.
cloudflare did a piece on how WASM supports it. ~18% of all websites on the web run through cloudflare.

https://blog.cloudflare.com/big-pineapple-intro/

(I'm not a software developer)
> We really need an open source alternative instead of putting all our faith in one for-profit company.

Open models on Hugging face are about 2-3 years behind OpenAIs. I think it's reasonable to expect open models to be on par with ChatGPT 4 in ~5 years, if it doesn't conquer the world first.
Interest rates have increased. Thus, the full cost of a project that takes some time to complete before generating revenue has increased. Thus, some projects are no longer a profitable endeaver
I agree, it seems like we're tending toward dystopia more and more each day
That quote isn't what I wrote. And the relevant bank is mentioned just prior to the bit you quoted. And now they have a new shareholder: UBS. Which is also a bank.
So just like MS Office, Windows, Photoshop, AutoCAD and thousands of other essential commercial products controlled by a single company or small group of companies. This is not some unique phenomenon.
Hotels, apartments, etc; things designed for such rentals should be in an entirely different category than (intended as single owner / dwelling) housing.
> you put all your companies' money here, far beyond FDIC insurance levels, and don't go anywhere else, and for that we'll get you a nice rate on this unrelated private deal.

that's called fleecing the rubes and scamming the noobs
... and then someone tries to do a quick fix with regex
Posting about your company when relevant is one thing, advertising it another’s launch thread is another, and it’s pretty gauche… especially when, in this very thread, one of your testimonials is saying he doesn’t actually use your product: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35236557
Just to be clear, since you say it's local, when you say no code is sent to a third party AI that includes Codeium? For search and indexing, code is not sent over the network at all?
where can you see the activity history with location data? (Sorry for asking you since my other assistant isn't available.)
> Future benefits of technology will primarily be enjoyed by the 1% with the other 99% becoming poorer and working (hours wise) more.

The history of technology & capitalism is quite the reverse.

A few years back, a steamboat from the 1850s was discovered buried in the muck in the Missisoupi. Archeologists rushed to dig it up and discover what it was carrying. They had the same notion you did. They were shocked that the steamboat was not carrying luxury items at all. It was loaded to the gills with manufactured stuff for ordinary folks. Things like factory made shoes, textiles, tools, pots, pans, dishes, bottled food, nails, hardware, etc.

You see the same thing today with, for example, the iphone. That machine was made for everyone, not just the 1%. And it made Apple the richest company in the world.

Look at what wealthy tech companies make - they make stuff for ordinary people.
This is very similar to Bashly (https://bashly.dannyb.co/) but with a lot more weird magic going on.
But the structure of those spaces can be different! The only structure IP imposes is that every packet has a source and destination address. It's up to each protocol whether it has port numbers (like TCP, UDP, and SCTP), or not (like ICMP and IGMP), or some other mechanism for identifying flows.
Yeah also sometimes physical hardware is a constraint on waste.
Quality & performance of code often has a way of degrading to the point it saturates the available hardware.

In the absence of friction to buy more immediate incremental capacity, teams may never optimize their code..

This may be good when you are "moving fast & breaking things".

This may be bad when you are trying to operate an already-scaled business profitably.
Most of my ChatGPT conversations involve trying to goad it into saying *extremely* inappropriate things, in part because i want to test its boundaries and in part because it's funny seeing the computer program say horrible things. I'm definitely more worried about my chatgpt history because i don't stand behind anything i've said to it.
Do people in capitals not understand or believe this? What do rich people (some of whom control large parts of the media) plan to do exactly? Die? Bunker? I mean seriously.
The details may be different but the whole "bailing out people who had more than $250k in SVB", reeked to me of the big people with money and power getting bailed out, while the small people get screwed again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental,_social,_and_cor...
What's stopping you right now?
I don't disagree with the existential threat proposed by climate change. I just think that you're being a condescending jerk, which will ultimately only impede progress toward your goals.

You're not going to convince people of your cause by calling them ignorant. Jesus.