skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I mean, it's not a terrible convention. On the website they have a badge ("docker official image"), but devs aren't usually looking at the website, they're looking at their Dockerfile in vim or whatever. This is a straightforward way to communicate that semantically through namespacing.

Still, shame on docker for the rug-pull.
Was the accumulation duration larger than the regulatory mark-to-market period? As I understand it, SVG was heavy on US Treasuries, which lost a great deal of value due to recent interest rate hikes. As a result of a higher than expected deposit withdrawal rate, SVG sold US Treasuries for less than what they would have received if they had held them to maturity.

If the gap in finances was discovered earlier, would they have just converted more equities and other long-term higher-yeild instruments into treasuries and then go under because they couldn't get returns to match their deposit interest rates?
I'd argue it's the opposite, government intervention and existence explicitly favors the biggest players and nudges the market into oligopolies and monopolies
> Sure, in the old days when money was physical and there were costs involved in storing it and transporting it that makes sense.

???

This never stopped being the case.

Banks receive deposits and make loans. They are core pieces of modern banking. They play a role in increasing the monetary supply through debt servicing.
for those of us who haven't been through an "AI winter", it's really interesting to hear a debate about AI from nearly 40 years ago.
How do you create an institution which can guarantee that it will always be able to take the results of its short term treasuries maturing, and convert that back into more short term treasuries, forever?

That sounds like the financial equivalent of a perpetual motion machine.

If an institution has no choice but to buy short term treasuries, why wouldn’t sellers increase the price that institution has to pay?
For your objection to refute my thesis, you'd need to explain how a world with stablecoins that are immune to bank runs, where those stablecoins are held in next-gen wallets and can be swapped into any asset in the world 24/7 any time you want at the click of a button, is not a superior UX vs. today's bank deposits.
> Randev said he attempted to reach out to Tesla with video evidence of the issue, but all he’s gotten from the automaker is radio silence.
Lead paint has a similar problem. It tastes sweet, which is why so many children end up eating paint chips.
radiations cause cancer and dont smell at all.
I second E-Myth and Founders at Work. And let me add Crossing the Chasm, which totally shaped my understanding of who buys what when.
I used to work in forum software development and thinking CAPTCHAs would slowly become obsolete as better detection methods are pioneered but instead CAPTCHAs just got more pervasive.

From my experience, any time a major provider creates a generalized solution, it get attacked very heavily as the benefit to bypassing a general solution is more valuable than a one-off solution. Sufficiently popular services who have a one-off captcha will also be targeted. The only reason why those text-based ones work is because nobody has targeted those yet because the players are just too small.
What testing?
Is that really true?

There are also new banks popping up here and there that grow very rapidly due to a more software/tech focus.

And there are smaller more specialized banks that have been doing well (in Switzerland). There is at least one very recognizable co-op bank here and another one with a focus on sustainability.
The government doesn't want you to "just park cash" because it makes monetary policy difficult and loans more expensive. Predictable and cheap credit is an necessary part of a functioning modern economy so the Fed incentivizes(forces) banks to use deposits to make loans.
Show HN: Web based collaborative board for teams
What makes you so sure half this comment section isn’t AI generated traffic to begin with?
Some explicit definitions of 'responsible, ethical and holistic' are needed here. Probably also explicit examples of irresponsible, unethical, and, err... reductive? behavior. Positive and negative reinforcement methods for our nascent AI child are urgently needed... I guess.

Already we have a problem in that 'holistic' might sound nice, but opposite concepts - reductionist, analytic, atomistic - etc. are not necessarily bad views. It's simply the difference between a top-down approach and a bottom-up approach, both can be valuable in different contexts. Of course, 'holistic' could be a synonym for 'inclusive' but again, this is fuzzy. Do we want our optimized AI to be inclusive with respect to say, the opinions of people who constantly froth with hatred of and contempt for others?

Here's another fun one: what's the optimal ethical ratio of compensation between the lowest-paid and the highest-paid members of an organization, such as a non-profit corporation, a state government, or a for-profit corporation?
In the case of utility companies you can always just pick up the phone and call their main customer service number to verify your account status and balance. Text messages and emails should always be treated with suspicion, but intercepting outgoing phone calls is outside the capability of regular scammers.
Most production workloads do not use docker directly, but rather use it as sorts of "installation format" that other services schedule (spin up, connect, spin down, upgrade). One of typical defaults is to always try and pull new image even if requested version is available in node-local cache. On one hand it prevents issues where services would fail to start on certain nodes in the event of repository downtime. On the other hand it blocks service startup altogether. With such a set up availability of registry is mission critical for continuous operation.

Some people think it is a perfectly reasonable idea to set up defaults to always pull, point to latest version and not have local cache/mirror. Judging from the number of upvotes on OP, depending on third party remote without any SLA to be always available for production workloads seems to be the default.
As I said, the scenario outlined is hyperbole... Practically, they won't actually bet on red but use all kinds of financial instruments to achieve the largest amount of yield possible with the depositors capital at their disposal. I'm aware the bank is wiped out and the deposits are no longer managed by SVB. None of this refutes the point that until the bank goes bust, the bank will try to maximize yield and shareholder returns with the cost being their own capital. The depositors capital, is an extra with no cost. As far as I am aware, shareholder profits won't get clawed back. Now that the $250K FDIC barrier has been lifted, the moral hazard is that the bank (not SVB which no longer exists, but any other bank) is no longer responsible for whatever happens with the capital of their customers - even if they would go completely bust; the FDIC will fix it.
Right, but if they're expected to be toxic you would mark them down nominally as well. It's not like the real losses aren't also nominal when realized.

And whether the metric you care about is the real losses or the expected nominal value at maturity depends on whether inflation continues to raise. As this also suggests interest rates increase, you get hammered on both sides.
I used them for a bit right after they switched, and iirc it was a shitshow technically, this was BEFORE everyone had wificalling as an option, and the phones had to be relatively specific Android models, and there were some older ones you had to send back to get a new one or you had to limp along on the old network.

I didn't care because I was 99% wifi at the time anyway.
Doctor Dobbs was hyping AI in the 80s...

Fifth Gen project, prolog etc. - Didn't change much

Expert systems were the rage for medicine back in the 90s? Don't see doctors out of work..

IBM Watson passed the bar in UK and was hired as a 'lawyer' - Don't see lawyers going away...

The hype circles keep circling ... Yeah, chatGPT is neat - but its still got a long way to go...

Edit: oh - and lets not forget, we were all supposed to be programming in ADA now. It was going to 'take over' the world, first in DoD... then spreading to general usage. Can't remember the last time I saw an ADA job ?
Hopefully not to just sell it :-(

If he does eventually sell it, I hope it's to fans, not a corporation.
I'd like to switch to Google Fi, but the lower prices on Mint have kept me there. If prices increase, I'll finally switch over. I've also been hoping that Google would sort out/consolidate Google Fi/Google Voice.
Obviously it's just concurrent calls to a model that has a 30s window. x120 performance breakthrough by in voice recognition, exactly a multiple of 1 hr / 30s.

I did not say anything about openAI API calls. Neither did they in their post. The mention openAI whisper "model".

/end
1) The richest man in Babylon
2) The four agreement
3) Secrets of the Millionaire Mind
Are you kidding? There are 30 claims, it's an hours' work to make complete sense of how these work together and what they possibly do/do not cover. I've filed my own patents so have read thru enough of prior art and am not doing it for a pointless internet argument.
> I actually see elegance and justice in the cold, ruthless capitalist approach; I tend to think of it as tough love... But I don't believe that the system we have today is capitalism and so this cold, ruthless approach is actually unfair.

I'm curious as to how the hypothetical Capitalism would avoid quickly collapsing into a much more extreme version of the current state of affairs. Capital producing more capital seems built into the system, without strict controls on capital accumulation I don't see how the end result could be anything other than monopoly.
What features you think would be most useful for this type of tool?
Because the web solved app distribution and sandboxing before desktop operating systems did.
I hope that they'll publish that video if Tesla doesn't get back to them. I'd love to see how it actually works.
Time for someone to get creative and build a gpt-powered kitboga chatbot.
> I feel for the rough spot they are in.

I don't. Because there is this pattern from VCs to fund business models that involve dumping millions in resources as Open Source on the world and then owning a part of the ecosystem.

Docker originally wanted to "own" everything, if CoreOS hadn't pushed for the OCI spec, debalkanizing containers, Docker would have a near monopoly on the container ecosystem.

At this point Docker is just the command, and it is a tire fire of HCI gaffs.
Thanks! These are all great questions, apologies for the wall of text

1. We're definitely more of a generic streaming framework. But I could see ML being one of those use cases as well.

Why Ray?
One of our main drivers was how "pythonic" ray feels, and that was a core principal we wanted in our framework. Most of my prior experience has been working with Beam, and Beam is great but it is kind of a whole new paradigm you have to learn. Another thing I really like about ray is how easy it is to run locally on your machine and get some real processing power. You can easily have ray use all of your cores and actually see how things scale without having to deploy to a cluster. I could probably go on and on haha, but those are the first two that come to mind.

2. We really want to support a bunch of frameworks / resources. We mainly choose BQ and Pub/Sub because of our prior experience. We have some github issues to support other resources across multiple clouds, and feel free to file some issues if you would like to see support for other things! With BuildFlow we deploy the resources to a project you own so you are free to edit them as you see fit. BuildFlow won't touch already created resource beyond making sure it can access them. In BuildFlow we don't really want to bake in environment specific logic, I think this is probably best handled with command line arguments to a BuildFlow pipeline. But happy to hear other thoughts here!

3. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "glue", so apologies if this doesn't answer your question. The BuildFlow code gets deployed with your pipeline so it doesn't need to run remotely at all. So if you were deploying this to a single VM, you can just execute the python file on the VM and things will be running. We don't have great support for multi-stage pipelines at the moment. What you can do is chain together processors with a Pub/Sub feed. But we do really want to support chaining together processors themselves.
Things become a word when there is a critical mass of people that use the word. In this case vending initially refereed to placing a copy of the source code of the third party library into /vendor/ subdirectory, thus "vendoring" it. It has since been extended to similar use cases and has become part of the software developer jargon.
The USA is weirdly fond of using words (or cryptic abbreviations of words) where other countries use icons

It's not weird at all. The rules were created at a time when the United States was very monolingual.

Europe made its rules around symbols because there are lots of people speaking lots of languages next to one another and crossing borders.

Not weird at all. Just logic and history.
If the least few months have taught us anything, it's that Elon Musk is not big on testing things before they go to production.
I agree it doesn't feel right. I have a Tesla, and often come out and find other Teslas parked right to mine. Sometimes 4 or 5. At some point, someone would've been able to unlock mine and done something to my car. Or similar settings anywhere else.

I think we'd have heard this story more than once if it was possible.

EDIT: I grant the possibilities outlined by the responders to my post... still, I'll put a little $$ on this getting clarified otherwise in the coming weeks -- but not any more than that, as I've lost a $ in this week's banking crisis.
India is yes cheaper, but not apples to apples. US is bigger. You are also paying to be able to use service in over a large land mass.
I went the other way. I pulled PCs and anything they COULD install bad software out of the equation.
People have lots of trouble with Paypal (e.g., accounts being locked). People have lots of trouble with Tesla. Twitter has been a complete disaster since Elon took over. So... how in the world has SpaceX managed to do so well?
I figured if it had dissolved over the years it would be safe
Cost and time describe actual metrics. Quality does not. We can’t even define what we mean by “quality,” much less measure it.

What we call “quality” turns out more subjective than we like to think. It makes more business sense to focus on cost and time, to get something in front of users that offers some marginal value. Users may or may not have other options. A “low quality” product can still serve to prove a market’s viability, to make measuring costs and time more accurate in the future, to establish a foothold in the market.

Look at the success of Wal-Mart and think about what that says about how consumers value price and convenience (i.e. their time) over quality. Better quality products, however defined, do not always win.

Software developers too often value what they think of as “quality” over every other consideration, which doesn’t make sense in business terms, where a late or never-delivered product that cost a lot of money has no return on investment.
>Why do you fear getting drafted?

Is that a serious question? Do you have any experience with war beyond Call of Duty?

>Do you think that NATO will have an issue defeating Russia?
Are you aware that Russia is a nuclear power and has stated very clearly that it will respond with nuclear force if its territorial integrity or existence is threatened? And it even possesses hypersonic missiles, which the West does not have?
True, it'd be communist politicians here; anybody who praise them get punched by local people, after all.

Political bias is a very weird thing to navigate for IT people. Especially when technical capability, e.g. AI-assisted translation, is above and beyond sensitivity to 'local needs' in each country, or even in each specific regions.
Taken too far this can cause problems. Many have experienced the over-walked nature park where one can't even tell what the official trail is anymore. I have volunteered in public parks, and one of the difficulties is encouraging the use of the official paths, and discouraging use of the 'social paths' (as we called them), while maintaining the natural look of the trail.
> This thread is getting nowhere but I'll leave it with this: the attitude you've outlined here is really patronizing.

It's not.

> That these users can't possibly have valid opinions about the tools they use, if they dare to be happy with them they are wrong because you know better than they do. How dare they not care about 20% CPU usage! How dare they!

You're ascribing thoughts and words to me that I never said or thought.

> at no point have I made an argument that has anything to do with privacy

What argument did you then make? We're literally in the context of why these things are the way the are due to privacy concerns

> I don't think conversation beyond this point is productive.

I don't think it was ever meant to be productive with opening like "you're thinking like an engineer and can't ever imagine what a user thinks or does"
> Yup, and definitely anticipate there will be major new regulations in this area.

It already happened. The new regulation is that the Fed now has a liquidity backstop for banks holding this asset class, using cash loans with a set maximum term against the par value.

Apparently the Fed decided “if we treat it this way for capital adequacy, and we provide liquidity backstops for banks for other asset classes based on how they are valued for capital adequacy, maybe we should do the same thing here, since otherwise adequate capital can easily and suddenly become inadequate.”
Are you disagreeing with parent comment? I’m having a hard time parsing.

Are you claiming that economies of scale don’t exist, or that they are trivial to the composition of markets?
Uncertainty in the measurement of its position and velocity.
I would think od volatile as reacting. If it just means evaporating, then I guess that makes sense.
It's not like they can just click a new one in place. $50 for a quality battery and $40 to pay someone a living wage to mount it in half an hour doesn't sound excessive to me.
Oh, I almost forgot Apple replaced one of my earlier iPhones for free because the old one didn't boot with the new battery. No questions asked, even got a free loaner phone for the few hours until replacement was delivered. I wonder how many $25 battery replacement shops give that amount of service and warranty.
There are lots of high functioning but harmless crazy people out there . I used to work for a government job and I found one of the most common tells was exactly what this "slaughter" person did. They love to list dozens of agencies to you for no reason. They have no authority so they hope they can borrow it from your fear of a random place. I cannot tell you how many emails/calls I have had left that fit this pattern, dozens at least.

>I have talked to now: FBI FBI Regional, VA, VA OIG, FCC, SEC, NSA, DOH, GSA, DOI, CIA, CFPB, HUD, MS, Convercent

Bonus Tell: They also love to say they are a doctor or PHD of something or often say PHD in multiple subjects.
Hi HN, This is an ongoing pet project of mine. Been working on data manipulation stuff for more than a decade and originally built this entirely written in bash for the terminal exclusively.

Early product vision was for handling merging and organizing csv files quickly and easily.

As time has gone on, I've pivoted and expanded to a full-fledged CSV importer which (bonus) includes multiple file merging support and a pretty cool UI for mapping.

Looking for as much feedback as I can to enhance it even more.
All the ways the most common bit of climate misinformation is wrong
> Yep. These things happen, which is why hosting a copy on your own gitea, website, etc is so important.

...which involves an ongoing cost anyways. Docker is tired of free hosting to everyone (unless they're a vetted Open Source project), so you're going to see projects either move to the next free solution or solicit donations/more donations specifically to support hosting an open access registry.
Time to disrupt banking by making it go the way of rotary phones.

Foisting belief someone like paulg is worth billions given cherry picked math that makes it so does not make paulg special.

It’s traditional political corruption embedded in the minds of inept and infirm, shell shocked by war, made paranoid by cold wars, that makes the rich rich.

It’s policing society to make us all believe Elon or Billy G are wealthy.

Propaganda and information shaping from war era government research was gifted to university and converted into behavioral economics, advertising, and marketing programs. Americans are oblivious they’re just eating their own farts and BS.
That is a very naive comparison. Even beyond the apocalyptic qualification.
I love autobiographies. Made in Japan (Sony), Made in America (Walmart), My Father Marconi (not quite an autobiography, but by his daughter).

My Father Marconi especially. The story of when he sent the first radio transmission across the air in his attic as a boy is wild.
The Hard Thing About Hard Things. We bought a copy for every employee at my last company to help convey the messages that startups are not designed to be tons of fun but rather a tough (yet rewarding) grind. This was especially important for people who were coming from bigger companies to understand.
This smells like BS to me. I've been in similar situations - in a rush I run to a tesla that looks like mine on the street, near where I parked. When I try to open it though I can't I get frustrated for a minute before I realize I'm a dunce and my identical looking car is 2 spots over.

Everything worked there as expected. This other random car didn't open. The way these key pairing systems are built it wouldn't really make sense for it to open or start. Thats why to me this smells like BS.
I know many Windows laptops support Miracast (both as source and as sink) for wireless display transfer.

I think Apple has developed its own Airplay protocol, though. There are Airplay sinks for Linux, so if you can find a way to share a screen over Airplay the setup shouldn't be too bad, especially wired.
You know as well as I that the reason is that cash was able to sit in banks without losing money as a depositor. That gentleman's agreement is gone, due a set of actors' individualistic and uncooperative actions.
We, the programming community. And I'd rather you would have nothing to do with it than me.
Tfblib – Simple low-level graphics library for drawing to the Linux framebuffer
"don't expect" or "for certain"? Can't really plan ahead without some kind of certainty.
Just wanted to say that I love the dot-pattern background. Very subtle, nicely done.
I see, what fault tolerance mechanisms does it provide?

I don’t see anything on snapshotting or checkpointing like Flink. Is this just for stateless jobs?
Sadly the amount of bots is a stain on the internet to the point that actually processing all requests from them can take down a web app.
It's not actually that sensitive a risk profile -- Paypal has shown itself to be untrustworthy with how it'll just freeze an account that you have a bunch of money in or explicitly suck extra money out of your bank account or with the updated terms of service last year that they "backed down on" only slightly. Paypal also owns Venmo, so I won't touch that one. Not sure about CashApp, but I only see it listed by sketchy people and instagram influencers, so I've never considered it trustworthy to begin with. At least Zelle was part of the services provided by my bank (Chase)? Clearly it's worse than that initial impression in practice, but I'm not sure that it's really worse than Paypal or CashApp?