skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks for addressing it.

Also: the thing looks really compelling. I would really like to try it out. But I can't use it. Not with irrevocable consent. If I make something that turns into billions of dollars...well, there are people that would exploit these terms. It's an absolute no-go.

> Obviously, there's no "content moderation" for project code that you collaborate on with Zed.

Not only is it non-obvious, it's explicitly stated that you can do what you want with any content that you are exposed to, which is all of it, because you've granted yourself the ability to surveil everything. And not only what the "Application" or "Tool" sees, but by any means available to you by the "Service."
The full list of 76 cities is available here: https://smartasset.com/data-studies/dd-what-100000-is-worth-...

As a proud Texan, I am very happy to see so many Texas cities ranked high on affordability. I often hear people say we should also consider the quality of life in expensive cities. Although I agree that quality of life on standard metrics might be better in NYC, SF, or Honolulu, I would rather save my money living in Texas and take vacations to pricy places.
Ask HN: How often does your company deploy to production?
Previously, we rolled out the new version whenever we had something worth showing or a bug fix. Now we are on a daily 10am rhythm.

I am curious to know how often other companies are doing it.
Admitedly, this is somewhat an hilarious tweet.
Do you mind sharing the binaries?
What do you mean? I've bought sola bread in the past and it... functioned exactly as bread in a sandwich. I just preferred larger sourdough slices so I stopped but it functioned the exact same as bread.
I think for practical purposes you could hold that text from wikipedia or scientific papers if true, for example. The issue I think OP is referring to is if a LLM can refer back to these axiomatically true sources to ground and justify its outputs like a human would.
lol it looks like we posted similar things at basically the same time - I'd also maybe add that it's noteworthy that this isn't what Huawei was doing where they just overlayed a stock photo of the moon. What Samsung is doing is enhancing the actual data your phone's sensor is getting, which makes it much more like astrophotography processing than just some gimmick/hack.
Am I the only person who hates feature flags? We're doing it so we can do trunk based Dev. It's ridiculous, it makes every feature so much more complicated. All for the sake of not managing some branches.
Citation for that research would be very interesting, as i've not seen that.

Part of the beauty of living with nonhumans is the invigoration of sharing understanding and cooperation across species.

I think this is normally called "A dog is a man's best friend." or something similar.

I suspect it holds across millenia because that cross species relation is at times more dependable and communicative than individuals of the same species often are capable of, and that's not sarcasm, I mean it's where that phrase comes from. And i say that as someone not averse to humans collaborating, just as someone who lives among many species.
They mentioned in this video[0] that they expect others, mainly other studios, to contribute to the project.

[0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ozd4JqquG3k&t=117
Describe your process of reasoning, and how it differs from taking inputs and producing outputs.
Seems targeted at CentOS7, support for which is sunset in little over a year. Smells a bit like abandonware, hoping for adoption by unpaid volunteers.

Still, dumping it into FOSS community is not the worst graveyard for commercial software...
My team also user ECR, but I've not got any complaints. What issues do you have with it?
This is a total non-answer. Nothing but technojargon and babble for baffling the average consumer. They fall short of admitting that yes, they effectively replace images with "enhancements" that are sourced from their ML models in some cases - they prefer to talk about how they merge multiple frames - taken by you - with AI Magic (tm).
>Yet a Marxist site is used as an unbiased source.

You're welcome to present a capitalist site as a source for the definition you prefer, and I'd be happy to discuss that.

Just don't use a dictionary, please! It's the wrong tool for the job here, regardless of political leanings.
Luckily I read this comment before starting the thing. (I as always clicked "agree" on the license/TOS screen).

Into the ~/.Trash it goes.
Alas prosecuting dictators and government officials in third-world countries doesn’t really happen, and the only way to prevent them stealing the nation’s wealth is to block the transfers
> Why would you chargeback in Fortnite instead of just refunding?

It's really cool that Steam has a working refund system but I'm not sure it helps with the explanation of why refunding on Epic is an insurmountable challenge.
Already ChatSpot is doing it. Their system is essentially a ChatGPT-enhanced Hubspot management system using chatux.

ChatSpot can understand your commands and then perform actions in the system for you, for example add a lead, change their contact info, write a blog post, publish it, add an image…

Edit: but if you connected it with physical actions, it could control your house, maybe check your smart refrigerator, order food on Instacart, send you recipe, schedule the time to cook in your calendar, request an Uber to pick you up from work, invite someone over, play music…

There’s a discussion about this on another homepage thread here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35172362
Interesting, I use to use an editor called 'zed' on MS-DOS that cane with zortech c.

This one looks a lot different :)
> In real terms, you will get back exactly a hundred million.

In nominal terms. In real terms you have to adjust for inflation. [1] is a starting point if you want to read more.

> As long as you hold to maturity, the number of dollars does not change.

A dollar now is not the same as a dollar 10 years from now. [2]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_versus_nominal_value_(eco...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_preference
High Stakes, No Prisoners by Charles Ferguson:

"Charles Ferguson started Vermeer Technologies and turned his very cool, very big idea into FrontPage, the first software product for creating and managing a website. A mere twenty months after starting the company, he sold it to Microsoft for $133 million, making a fortune for himself and his associates. FrontPage now has millions of users and is bundled with Microsoft Office. But getting there wasn't always fun."
I just installed on my Monterey Macbook, but it won't launch. No window appears. I tried launching from a python file, still nothing.

Well, if as you say in your site's vision section, "the editor should disappear", it seems you got it.

WAIT. It took a full 5 minutes to come up the first time. So be forewarned.
That follows from nothing said, nor was any mention of values made.
Zelle has all of the downsides of cryptocurrency without any of the upsides
Early on in the 'controversy' someone on Reddit undertook a similar test, by photoshopping an image of the moon to have a different crater pattern, blurring it, and taking an enhanced photo. Samsung 'enhanced' the moon with the incorrect crater pattern.

After seeing that, I was pretty skeptical about the "they're just swapping in a high res png!" claims, regardless of how much they got repeated. This post is more evidence they're not just swapping in a higher res image, but I hunch people will keep repeating it anyway.
what I don't understand is how it's seen as acceptable to pay several thousand dollars for a machine that is sold as a "full experience" and then relying on the work of some people outside Apple that build homebrew and make it actually usable for development
I think it's helpful to keep in mind that any design will be to some extent "OS-specific" for a lot of different reasons, available fonts being only one factor.

I also think OS-specific design is perfectly appropriate for a lot of use cases. I use "font-family: system-ui, sans-serif" on my resume page, for example, because I know that the default system fonts look fine (by design) on any screen and a fast, lightweight page is more important to me than a specific font presentation. If you're creating a user interface with really tight tolerances on element size or appearance, different strategies might be more appropriate.
For me it depends on the time of the day. Also I prefer light background on video call screen sharing for some reason I can't really articulate.
Yeah I noticed that, lol! We even used the same verbiage. You must be a really smart person ;)
The other day some one mentioned any of these surveys consistently have about a 5% troll rate.

The 77% belief in angels is bizarre though. Like I believe in the possibility of aliens, the universe is quite large. Although I think all spacecraft sightings are almost certainly just mundane stuff from spy planes to weather balloons, etc. I even believe in the possibility of ghosts being real, more likely some strange phenomenon we can't explain that we might misidentify as ghosts. But angels?

One man's angel is another man's ghost or alien though I guess.
There is no way this would be legal. No chance.
There is no free tier
https://quay.io/plans/
For most of us, a bank is a place to just park cash. Most people are well under the $250k insurance. It seems the government is willing to cover depositors above that amount now too (SVB).
It's just randomness.
Wasn't the main concern that a fixed quantity of money chasing a constantly increasing quantity of goods/services would eventually cause severe deflation?
That's the damage; reducing demand even more. Remember that when the United States Treasury is selling their treasuries, they're selling into the same market. Crashing demand leaves the Treasury unable to raise money. And then the second-order effect of this in a derivative-riddled market causes its own havoc.

Part of the reason they don't fire this gun is precisely that they'd lose out on a lot of value. But then, what do they do if the US signals strongly that it is going to go ahead and inflate the currency sharply, meaning they're only going to get a de facto big discount anyhow?

And I don't mean that as a simple question, where I'm implying a certain answer I'm trying to convince you of. You have to game this out like a game of chess, where this cascades out into a huge decision tree. The tree has gotten complicated lately. Taking economic damage to deal your enemy a bigger economic blow is getting disturbingly close to a rational move lately, in cold global realpolitik terms. Would China be willing to bet they could roil the US in enough domestic chaos that US leadership would become uninterested in stopping their incursion into Taiwan, even if it meant taking a hit themselves? I'm not saying the answer is "yes". I'm saying "the answer is a lot more complicated than it was a decade ago".
I've had repeated issues using Fortnite gift cards, some I bought myself. Zero help from Epic. I bet others have as well.
How come last time there were only 38 points but 69 comments, but now there are 325 points but I’m the first to comment?
Surviving the SVB Crisis as a Founder
It was an announcement of upcoming source opening, but at the moment there was no public source repo.
Hetzner also has a pop in Finland.
Well, HIPAA can be self-certified, but that probably won't stand up in court so most organizations will pay a third-party provider to perform the certification for them. That also lets you see the gaps, because HIPAA is big.

Here's AWS's list of HIPAA-eligible services. HIPAA-eligible is technology provider specific:

https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/hipaa-eligible-services-re...

Here's google's:

https://cloud.google.com/security/compliance/hipaa-complianc...

In general it means that the service may not be HIPAA compliant by default, but can be configured to be HIPAA compliant.

HITRUST is something else and it outside the scope of this discussion IMO. Not sure why you brought that up.
Astronomers aren't lying to us to sell smartphones based on the quality of advertised images.
Recent and related:

Samsung caught faking zoom photos of the Moon - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35136167 - March 2023 (27 comments)

Update to the “Samsung space zoom moon shots are fake” - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35123389 - March 2023 (122 comments)

Samsung “space zoom” moon shots are fake, and here is the proof - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35107601 - March 2023 (386 comments)
Can you please point out where you find this exclusion? You may be right, and it's hard to examine with the dual numbering system in there, but I've been through it and I don't see anything other than "everything is ours."
I'm gonna stick with neovim - from the Zed homepage seems like its using all the same base technologies, Treesitter, LSP, and some out of the box support for the capabilities these base layers offer.
But do you have the funds/time to find out?
As with any real-world technology, it all depends on what you want to sacrifice.
No, they are comparing Potential Asteroid Impact (2046) with Current Year (2023)
Good point. Yes. But there are too many versions and varieties. In the same vein there is a lot of variety of image layers. What problem does Flatpak solve? I assume it's because it's tough to create Linux desktop applications when you have no idea what shared libraries, compiler, or version expect.
do people actually use SVMs anymore?

like, regression, sure - because it's a tool to measure how well a hypothesis (polynomial function) matches the data (points.) and CNNs are still foundational in computer vision. but the first and last time I heard of SVMs was in college, by professors who were weirdly dismissive of these newfangled deep neural networks, and enamored by the "kernel trick."

but aren't SVMs basically souped up regression models? are they used in anything ML-esque, i.e. besides validating a hypothesis about the behavior of a system?
> We don't blame victims of other crimes

Humans blame victims so often they've created a specific term for it - "victim blaming"
one day those coins will be sold, I think, and we'll see if bitcoin can go beyond Sathoshi
I thought a lot of the Atom developers moved to create Pulsar Editor.

https://pulsar-edit.dev/

Also, the community forked Atom into a community edition (CE), still getting updates?

https://github.com/atom-community/atom/

What makes this "Atom Developer Editor" different than Pulsar or Atom-CE.
Discussed at the time:

OpenAI Sold its Soul for $1B - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28416997 - Sept 2021 (86 comments)
> You can’t calculate NPV. You can only estimate it.

According to Merrian-Webster [1]:

calculate: 1 b: to reckon by exercise of practical judgment : ESTIMATE

[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/calculate
It is clear based on the following study that even exclusive pipe smoking causes a variety of cancers: https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/96/11/853/2520796

It is certainly true that cigarettes are generally more carcinogenic. However, your statement that "actual tobacco can cause emphysema, not cancer" is emphatically false.

I would suggest being somewhat less confrontational when your primary source on an actively researched topic is from 1964. In your words, "[j]ust love how everyone insists they know absolutely everything and are never wrong. Guess what?"
Ah, ok. I thought you were talking about something a bit more profound than that.
Generative methods per se are pretty sick and dope, and are still useful for many things beyond art generation.
It seems like a hack that really should be built into the system.

It is insurance only for those in-the-know.
The course lectures/materials aren't online nor public. However, there is a top 10 CS school with online lectures that touch the same points:

https://omscs.gatech.edu/cs-8803-o10-special-topics-ai-ethic...
> However, the moon will not be properly recognized by the camera and Scene Optimizer technology if it is obscured by clouds, or if the moon object itself is the side that is not visible from the Earth.

Great, if you're planning a moon-orbiting mission, you now know not to rely on your Samsung Galaxy to give super-resolution when taking images of the far side. Good to know!
Not-for-profits can also vote to sell themselves if their bylaws don't prohibit it.
Ha, touché...
This doesn't make sense as an argument at all. If there isn't anyone using the image, no one will have it on their computer... Sure - but that isn't as much of an issue if you have a build file that constructs the image up from more basic parts. Secondly, the popular files get way way faster with the more their used/downloaded.
Torrent is a phenomenal *wonderful* system to distribute Machine Learning weights, docker images, and databases.
It's a developers dream for a basic utility of distributing data.
Potentially ipfs could be useful too, but idk much about it specifically.

One of the most revolutionary and fundamental tools to be made is a basic way / template / paradigm which constructs databases in a replicable way, such that the hash of the code is mapped to the hash of the data. Then the user could either just download the data or reproduce it locally, depending on their system's capabilities, and automatically become a host for that data in the network.
They could start selling ammo again?

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/12/world/europe/swiss-neutra...
"isn't this just a natural progression of the same sorts of image enhancements we've been doing previously?"

No. Every other technique is improving on raw data using that raw data and knowledge about ways to process data.

This is adding data, not just processing it.
uhm? Every Smalltalk environment I know have great documentation, integrated right in the environment, and it is a better than Python for a beginner (I have been using Python since 1.6.1; I did Smalltalk professionally in the late 90s); surely much better than C++ or Rust.

The paradigm is different, so if you expect file-based interactions(*), you are approaching it wrong.

I just downloaded Pharo, run the current stable image 10.0, and the first thing that pops out is a "Welcome" window with links to
- https://mooc.pharo.org/

- http://books.pharo.org/

- A "Learn Pharo" section tells me to click on a link "ProfStef go." to learn the basics.

- Another one tells me to run "HelpBrowser open." to see the in-image documentation.

- In the help browser itself, I can find more tutorials and even a tutorial on how to make them.

- If I open any System Browser and filter the packages for "Examples" or "Tutorial", I get more stuff too. If I search for "Tests", I can read a lot more. Naturally, everything is hyperlinked and navigable like you'd get in a IDE for another language.

- If I open a System Browser, I can click on any package and get a UML class diagram for the package. Classes have comments, like python doc strings.

How do I open a file? I haven't touched Smallktalk in 20 years. I just opened a System Browser, searched packages for "File". Look there is a Files package with a File class. What does the comment say (the 2nd comment tab, which is formatted)? Examples of usage, how to open and write, encoding, buffering, etc. I can click on any method and then on "Senders"to see how it is used.

Then I remembered from 20 years ago, there should be a faster way to get there, so I just opened a transcript window and typed "File", selected it and Cmd-B (browse) to get to the class

---

I don't advocate Pharo or any Smalltalk environment but the reasons are not related the quality of its environment, just that developers are very hard to find and most support is moving on.

---

What has much better documentation?

I'd say Wolfram Mathematica.

The documentation is very extensive and consistent, you can see it online at https://reference.wolfram.com/language/

But if you open it from within Mathematica, it is also editable: you can change the code and execute it at any step.

e.g. you can open the documentation for https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/FindTextualAnswer...

and instead of doing:

question = "Who was the architect of the Sagrada Familia?";
articles = WikipediaData /@ WikipediaSearch["Content" -> question];
FindTextualAnswer[articles, question, 5, {"Probability",
"HighlightedSentence"}]

You want to ask "Who was the architect of Florence cathedral?"

You can change that and see what happens.

And since Mathematica is a symbolic language that is not limited by text input, you can copy any data structure or graphic (e.g. the graphs on https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/FindShortestPath.... Basic Examples and run code on that).
Well in that case, maybe the debate is: do we want that? Why?
Anybody has a success with build & run it under Linux? (Debian 11.x/Ubuntu 22.04.x)
How to change the satellite imaging industry
Activists resist proposal allowing police use of facial-recognition technology
I don't know why spoilers are relevant to this thread
They check for Mandela Effect issues on the linked page. GPT-4 is a lot better than 3.5. They demo it with "Can you teach an old dog new tricks?"
It can solve exactly zero leetcode easies if they are original problems seen for the first time for which no training data exists.
>There is no reason to believe that the AI will have self-preservation or self-replication as its goal.

There is. Bascially any goal given to AI can be better achieved if the AI continues to survive and grows in power. So surviving and growing in power are contingent to any goal; an AI with any goal will by default try to survive and grow in power, not because it cares about survival or power for their own sake, but in order to further the goal it's been assigned.

This has been pretty well-examined and discussed in the relevant literature.

In your example, the AI has already taken over the world and achieved enough power to forcibly freeze all humans. But it also has to keep us safely frozen, which means existing forever. To be as secure as possible in doing that, it needs to be able to watch for spaceborne threats better, or perhaps move us to another solar system to avoid the expansion of the sun. So it starts launching ships, building telescopes, studing propulsion technology, mining the moon and asteroids for more material...
Putting blame on the victim and pointing out that victim could've easily prevented the crime are two different things. We can put the whole moral responsibility on the perpetrator, and simultaneously advice other potential victims to properly safeguard themselves.
> To summarize: The company “in charge” of protecting us from harmful AIs decided to let people use a system capable of engaging in disinformation and dangerous biases so they could pay for their costly maintenance. It doesn’t sound very “value-for-everyone” to me.

Ever since the AI hype started this year, one thing that's always really bugged me is talk about "safety" around AI. Everyone is so worried about AI's ability to write fake news and how "dangerous" that can be while forgetting that I can go on fiver, pay someone in India, China, etc. to pump me out article after article of fake news for pennies on the dollar.

Also I hate the talk of "oh wow look how harmful the AI is, it made a naughty joke". I think of harm as being mugged, being beaten up, being shot. Harm is not some AI program telling a joke that could potentially offend someone.

All you end up with is an AI that is so kneecapped that it's barely useful outside of a select number of use cases. Can't write an article because it might be fake news, can't write an essay because it might be an assignment, can't solve that homework assignment because you might be cheating, I can't ask it to tell me a joke because the joke might be offensive.
We loved them in medical testing. Very explainable models.
I'm the original tweet author.

Currently typing this from my Pixel after running it countless times :)