skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And with Docker containers? And proprietary binaries? My point being, as you've proven in your reply, that most developers are going to only think of the most obvious cases.

And when you're a prolific writer and you've experienced more than just npm and GitHub, you're going to run across a scenario that makes you start thinking about how your practices in one ecosystem don't apply everywhere.

I own intellectual property composed of dependencies that can't be obtained anymore. Or two people in the world are the only individuals who are known to still have the dependency, but neither of them will supply it.

What's your plan for depending on a SaaS who goes out of business? Is everyone experiencing that on a regular basis? No, they aren't. But then you do. Once. And it changes how you do everything later, because you no longer have the privilege of not thinking about it.
From Moscow-City with Crypto: Receiving Cash from Russia Anonymously in London
This study's method does not properly assess the article's claim. OP's first statement is correct, the latter wasn't necessary, but I wouldn't call it misogynist.

The study isn't really the issue here. It's only titled "Women in the workplace", and includes statistics.

The article takes incredibly large leaps of logic to push a narrative.

Garbage like this shouldn't be allowed, and really isn't a good look for MIT Sloan.
I think as it currently stands that's still the case, however with Epic at the helm there's indeed a high risk of negative changes.
And why don't they answer for nearly a year after submitting a request, only to THEN ask to resubmit the request with an improved form or something. After which everything goes back to silence?
First Republic Bank Executives Sold $12M in Stock in Months Before Crash
I cut a ton of scam SMS messages by disabling email-to-sms for my phone. No more 3am porno spam from gmail accounts.
Hooks are much worse because they poorly emulate classes.

What you need for components is a stateful container, with an initialization phase, a render function that can be called for each update, and lifecycle methods that are called at lifecycle events.

Classes give you exactly this:

- Constructor for initialization

- Class fields for state

- A method for rendering that can be called multiple times, which can reference state

- Lifecycle methods

Classes are simple, standard, and give you everything you need for UI components. They were practically invented alongside the concept of UI components.

Hooks try to cram all of this into the repeatedly called render method and it's just a failure.

- You have to put initialization into callbacks because the whole component is called multiple times

- It's difficult to manage object and callback identity across renders requiring useCallback() and useState() to fix

- Lifecycle callbacks are put into hook arguments, but they're just trying to be methods and end up recreating the lifecycle closure every render.

- Hooks have restrictive rules on their usage

- Hooks make a function no longer just a function. It needs to be invoked inside a hook context, making it much less portable than a constructor

- Hooks hide their state within the hooks system, making them much harder to introspect and debug.

Hooks supposedly solve this composition problem and allow reusing logic, but that is entirely possible with classes. It's just a huge amount of FUD and misinformation to say that you can't do composition with objects. All you need is an object interface that is similar to the component interface that the component delegates to from its lifecycle methods. This is a simple and standard pattern to use and implement: it's just a single line of code per lifecycle method. And it's easily introspectable with a debugger: just follow object references to the helper objects.

lit.dev does with with reactive controllers: https://lit.dev/docs/composition/controllers/

It's a very simple alternative to custom hooks, and eliminates the need for all the builtin hooks.
Thanks, that sounds plausible but differs from some other digital providers so I'm not convinced; the annual option missing as well indicates a different approach.
OpenAI stopped publishing the architecture of GPT-4, so I'm worried that architecture availability will not be as available in the futire
Only about 1% of workers are on minimum wage, you wouldn't expect an average lifestyle from that.
Let's assume that GPT eliminates an entire field of experts, runs out of training data, and whoever is at the helm of that GPT program decides that it's lucrative enough to obtain more/better data. One alternative is subsidizing these experts to do this type of work and plug it directly into the model. I don't expect the nature of the work to change, more likely it's the signature on the check and the availability of the datasets.
Draft.js is now archived, and not being maintained. That can be for a number of reasons. When React first came out, it was several years before it really started to pick up steam. I think the Angular shift from v1 to v2 helped out React a lot, along with create-react-app scripts.

Deno is its' own beast, that I really appreciate. And Fresh isn't really a displacement of React, it's their spin on something like Next.js, and in some ways a lot nicer even. Still using JSX.

Web Components are pretty neat, and I see a lot of things moving towards that direction... I also find Lit, Svelte and others interesting. All of that said, popularity doesn't always mean best, or align with it. Timing, interest and "good enough" account for a lot. I happen to like the React way of doing things with function based components. I know a lot of the transition logic is PFM'd away, but it's fine for most.

I've also been following Rust, Yew and Tauri... doesn't mean I'm ready to completely jump ship. React has definite advantages when working on larger projects, the ecosystem and popularity are only parts of that. I think React + Redux + MUI are a really great combination for building applications against. In the end, it really depends on what you are making, what you are familiar with and what "feels right." I absolutely hate(d) angular 1 and 2+ with a passion... I just don't like the feel of it. React + Redux is much closer to how I would build simulation logic for training/learning well before React existed. And MUI is frankly a great component library.

I still keep an eye on what's out there and what's up and coming.
If BTFP can only be used by banks with hold to market bonds purchased before March 12th, then wouldn't the impact on bond prices be negligible? I suppose we could hypothesize what the bond market would like in the absence of BTFP and the much higher likely hood of contagion. Feels like yields would drop on the expectation that the Fed would be forced to lower rates due the crashing economy. So I guess one could argue that BTFP might cause yields to go down a little bit, but probably a lot less than they would have otherwise.

As to question 3, BTFP feels like a small dash of QE after pushing QT a little too hard and too fast. Banks will probably just put that extra cash into short term treasuries to shore up their balance sheet to protect against declining deposits. So I guess we should expect that extra cash to push short term yields down. Short term yields have already dropped a bit though, so maybe that is already priced in.
> enact laws that will change society to reflect your viewpoint

Society already reflects my viewpoint. Culture is based on remixing ideas. Most commonly copyright applies to direct reproduction, although there are obviously degrees. Whether copyright deserves to exist as it currently does is another discussion.

> instead your spouting nonsense just to serve your self interest. Hopefully not though!

What about my position is nonsense, and what do you think my self interest is?

Edit: Look, I'm sorry for rubbing you the wrong way, obviously we both have some strong opinions about AI generators, and maybe tool usage in general. I would like to know more about where you're coming from to have a reaction this visceral. The most glaring point of critique against current AI generators I would understand is the fact that multi-billion dollar startups are printing money using the work of other people for free. Is that it maybe? Would you have a reaction that strong if the models were open source?
I subscribed when YouTube TV first came out in 2017, for $35/mo. It was a good deal at the time and well worth it (since I didn't have cable), even though I didn't watch much regularly scheduled TV. When it hit $50/mo it wasn't a good deal anymore. Doesn't matter they added a ton of new channels because most of what is there is stuff no one (in my household) watches. This was the problem with cable, I don't want to pay $100/mo for 3 channels.

In the last few years there has been a fairly consistent drama of "Will they or won't they" related to channels. Seems like Google likes to play hardball with the channel providers and just causes a headache for the subscribers.

I'm not going to say this price hike is the straw that broke the camels back, because our house really didn't use YouTube TV regularly enough to warrant the price previously. But it was a good reminder to cancel the service, so I have.

Right now I can upgrade my cable internet provider (sadly the only high speed option right now) to add "Preferred TV" (aka ALL the channels) for only an additional $63/mo more than what I'm currently paying for just internet.

So yes, YouTube TV is more expensive than cable now.
Microsoft drops non-compete clauses and NDAs from employee settlements (2022)
So they might raise rates. If they can't recovered from SVB assets via selloff, the government loans on bonds, etc.
I was about to comment on the trademark issue but then I saw this top comment. I think you're making a mistake with your approach of 'crossing that bridge'. Trademark violation is no joke and it's so much easier to change the name early on rather than when you have some brand recognition and thousands of users. Learn from other people's mistake, don't make your own.
Yeah. I mean, personally I like TV and movies, but video games are more interactive.
It’s not just sci fi. It’s has already happened in past with construction. Things like pyramids and certain cathedrals and what not are no longer possible even with machines. At least this is what I’ve read and heard, I’m not actually an engineer or architect.

Tangent, I’m looking for some sci fi about this topic. Any suggestions?
Do you think that Facebook has an effect on society and our democracies? That's power. Do you think that large corporates like Apple or Google effect our societies? I do - and that's power. EVERY large corporate has power and if they control some aspect of society, even more so. If AI tools are democratised in some way, then that would allay my concerns. Concentration of technology by for-profit corporations concerns me. This seems quite similar to many of the reasons people like OSS, for example. Maybe not for you?
>> they simply have the failing bank acquired by a peer bank

"Simply".

WaMu - acquired, depositors got 100 cents on the dollar

IndyMac - 50 cents on the dollar

Silver State - 11 cents on the dollar

Depositors have not always been made whole in the past. Calvinball has certainly been played in the past, for IndyMac the FDIC limit was retroactively raised from 100K to 250K.

That's what people are pissed about. The Calvinball rules.

And we know how that works out, if you're in the in group, you get paid, and if you're not in the in group, you get fucked.

As Black Flag once sang, "We're tired of being screwed. Revenge!"
> This impacted less than 2% of our users.

Hmm, I’m not sure how I feel about them making excuses a few sentences into what is supposed to be an apology.
Scala 3, or perhaps OCaml.
> Only employees in senior leadership roles, such as partners and executives, will have to sign and comply with non-compete agreements. That means most employees in the US will be free to look for jobs with other companies considered as Microsoft competitors, such as Google.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail doesn't throw mass out the back. Although, it's not a lot of propulsion, it's something.
My phone number somehow got listed under my mother's info. I don't know how, but they know she's in the Medicare age bracket and they know she owns a fully paid of home in a desirable neighborhood. I get roughly 5-10 calls a day about these things. That's ignoring the fake bank and Amazon calls I get.

I've also noticed answering the call makes it much more likely that you will receive more calls in the future. Even though I usually answer the call just to make them waste an hour talking to me as I pretend to be an old man who has trouble installing TeamViewer or finding my credit cards.

Some of the spam groups have even blocked my number since I've trolled them so much. But I still get calls from their system, and when I answer it says something like "You have been blocked from contacting this number. Goodbye."
The way I see it as a worker you are making your abilities available and are entitled absolutely to the wages they give you. Kind of feels like robbing them sure, but they're robbing themselves. More of an indictment of capitalism and corporate structure than anything else. Pay it forward if you can and their loss is everyone else's gain.
I don’t think it’s really because “the machine is doing most of the work”, but because there’s no good way for clients to assess the quality of the supplemental human work, and therefore the market gets flooded with subpar translators who do the task sloppily on the cheap, in a way that still passes as acceptable.
yes - you could add regulation
Most of what you're paying for isn't technology.
For me, it has a been a very recent thing. A couple years ago, I would have had a handful a year. Now it wouldn't surprise me if I had a couple a day.
> The article takes incredibly large leaps of logic to push a narrative.

Please talk about what strikes you as the largest one.
I have no horse in this race, but fwiw, I can see how this mistake would be made honestly. Organization data could be easily refer to just the metadata of the organization, and depending on how the product is structured[1], could feel quite different from public images.

[1] Disclaimer: I don't know how the product is structured.
Every few years someone thinks that they have a new plan to revolutionize labor organizing, usually involving some sort of app that will somehow replace the work necessary to organize a union, and they are always wrong. Building a union that's strike-ready requires a lot of on the ground work that you simply cannot automate.
Maybe somebody here can explain something I just doin't seem to be able to understand. Why is it so hard for banks to do a stress test?

They have all the data. If I was CEO of a bank I'd want to be able to get up in the morning and have some idea how much risk and what types of risk my bank was assuming. Especially in a dynamic environment of Fed interest rate changes. I would think they would be doing it all the time. Isn't that what computers do? Simulate scenarios like - What does our bank look like if the Fed raises rates to %2 etc. It makes me feel like they truly just don't want to know so they can do whatever they want.
The video game industry is quickly approaching the television industry. It has become simply an interactive tool for narrative delivery.

Its simply a matter of time before the cancerous growth of capitalism gets its fingers into the media even deeper.

Mark my words. Gaming is trending towards subscription service, and advertising will only find its way deeper into the way content is delivered until your sessions are 20 minutes long with 5 minutes for ads.

Illegalize advertising.
Yeah, and that she joined just as the internal demand was probably going down. She was hired in anticipation of a need that didn’t materialize. Kudos to her for “fighting” for work. Most people would be tempted to slack off.
> I dislike paying for expensive sports licensing I don't watch.

In this line, I've been paying Fanatiz for a while and I absolutely vouch for their service. It was a godsend to me, since I live in a remote area and have no access to a good cable package. I can simply select the leagues I want to watch and pay only for those. It is an absolute delight to deal with their business model. I don't want to pay 100 bucks for every single league on every single country, I literally just want to watch 4 matches a month, why should I pay more than 20 bucks?
I've just started testing GPT-4 on translation from Japanese to English, but it seems to blow Google Translate out of the water. It was particularly good with a novel excerpt. I encourage people to try it with a variety of languages and texts to see if those results hold up.
I understand why they went after her (although stealing 6 million should also be punished, even if no one else stole anything).

I was respond to:

> While SBF received much more, I wonder how much in total benefits everyone received. The penthouse, private jets, and vacations probably add up quick.

They don't add up quick. Not in any meaningful sense.
Can you clarify 'hugely important'? The cited article seems to be saying 'don't make bad design choices or sacrifice usability or accessibility in the name of (bad) design'. I don't see it saying anything about selling more widgets by changing the font.
"Regulation" is what created those limits... Of course, the true limit being, the loss of their wordly posessions and assets, and possible jail time for anti-trust action. Lack of regulation defaults to common law, which is as much as possible restoring those harmed by those responsible.
It works until you have to do something trivial like changing the windshield wiper mode, or enabling the seat warmer while driving.
Oh boy, I never ever asked for a replacement for Number.isInteger! I prefer to use native functions.

Have a nice day.
Anyone interested in Italo Calvino's work with a pre-modern cast should read "Italian Folktales".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Folktales

He spent many years recording the oral traditions of several Italian regions, and he tells them well.

(If you read Italian or want to learn, the language of these tales is often simple and limited, and the stories are great! Unlike Victorian renditions of the Brothers Grimm...)
I do the exact same thing. I just cancelled YouTube TV. I'll probably get it again in the fall
Right, exactly. Had Angular.JS slowly implemented what is now just Angular, they wouldn't have displaced so many people so fast.

I think it still would have happened, but it's a shortsighted read into competitive analysis to not understand how this happened.
To clarify: there's no "native" fetch to patch. Both Nuxt and Next have been adding it to the runtime to normalize it across Node.js versions and environments, and to add critical capabilities that the Web standard lacked (like being able to read the `set-cookie` header or customize `Host`).

Worth noting: we've been enabling SSR for React since 2016[1], and some of the largest websites on the internet SSR with Next.js: Twitch, Hulu, Nike, and even parts of Amazon[2]

[1] https://vercel.com/blog/next

[2] https://twitter.com/rauchg/status/1594779272945627136
The dream of a la carte (before streaming was even a remote possibility) was to choose which channels you actually watched and which you didn't want and you would be charged accordingly. It was a reaction to too many channels that people didn't want but were charged outrageously for anyway. Cable was highly priced back then as I assume it still is today. Instead of all-or-nothing, people wanted to pay only for what they wanted in the hopes of reducing their overall bill.
That's pretty neat. I'm personally wondering in how far ML compute will be done on consumer devices, rather than on servers. We're currently seeing a lot of models that are so large that it doesn't seem feasible to run them locally. But I think there is reason to believe that these models carry a lot of redundancy. Redundancy that could lead to order of magnitude less memory/compute needed.

Or perhaps hardware will catch up before.
Just because Meta is pretty revenue efficient already doesn't mean it couldn't be more revenue efficient. Why is $2M per employee good? It's actually quite bad if Meta should be generating $10M per employee.
Hyperlinked Text – Directory of Text-Only Websites
Was this hiring for ML positions?

As someone who hired for this in general we'd use PhD (or maybe a Masters degree) as a filter by HR before I even saw them.

It's true that a PhD doesn't guarantee anything though. I once interviewed a candidate with 2 PhDs who couldn't explain the difference between regression and classification (which was sort of our "ok lets calm your nerves" question).
I recall current data center electricity consumption to be 2-3% of total electrical use. So at this scale, these are ultimately PR moves/engineering experiments that don't actually save money as a whole.

However, with LLMs coming, I could see data center energy usage jump 10x over the next decade. At that point, re-using data center heat will be be a real industry with real profits.
Imagine data center heated apartment heating, vertical farms.

I don't know how hotter regions are going to cope with the heat though. These AI datacenters could end up being entirely concentrated in the coldest regions.
Bing Chat is doing something like that, although it was far from perfect. Langchain can also do this to some extent. Then Steve Hsu claims to have been able to get a model working very well that can answer questions from college textbooks (https://twitter.com/hsu_steve/status/1636337165775908864). So it seems like someone will figure it out in a few years.
Recent versions of C# have expressly been working to minimize/eliminate verbosity. Things like namespace statements (rather than { } blocks), global usings, top-level statements, record types (by default structurally compared, immutable data structures defined often only by their constructor and nothing else), and much more.

Similarly recent libraries such ASP.NET have been working hard to use more of these things to eliminate their own boilerplate. The latest ASP.NET templates use top-level statements and some global usings and are getting very lightweight in terms of starter-level code.

.NET does have annotations and dependency inversion, but those too tend to avoid boilerplate more than create it. Few annotations are "required", depending on your domain and which libraries you are expecting to use. .NET now has a single, mostly standardized dependency injector that almost everyone has agreed to use (Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection) at this point. It intentionally only supports a bare minimum of Dependency Injection needs and is nothing like the Kitchen Sink approach of something like Java's Spring. (For instance, zero out of the box support for wiring Dependency Injection via XML files. .NET's DI is always code driven, often in a Startup.cs, Program.cs, App.cs, or Main.cs file.)

I've been increasingly finding in C# that I'm writing new code with zero templates and almost no snippets-expansion. (There will always be plenty of legacy code out there with much more verbosity, of course.)

The easiest suggestion is to try it for yourself. The `dotnet` tool is cross-platform, generally an easy install, and its `dotnet new` command will help you try many easy template types. You can relatively easily work entirely in VS Code today (as opposed to older versions of C# often "needed" the full bulky Visual Studio install for templates, language servers, and other stuff).
what gives me hope that they won't, is that they probably only bought Bandcamp to use it as a salvo in their legal battle versus Apple.
If you have the skills, self-hosting might be the way to go. There are a few options beyond Lychee these days [1].

[1]: https://github.com/meichthys/foss_photo_libraries.
Yeah, this pretty much means that I'm reconsidering everything I have on Vultr.

I hope they know what they're doing ...