skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm aware of Quay, I don't know the exact features that are going away, perceived or otherwise, from Docker that I can say this would fit everyone's usecase.

> And you believe that those 2 ideas are both held by the same people?

If I had to generalize the audience here, yes.
AFAIK Venus has a similar composition to Earth so it should have enough nickel. The rotation rate of 243.025 days per Earth day on Venus is the real problem for it having a magnetosphere.
In Bandcamp's messaging when they were acquired, expanding these payment systems was a major highlight. Combine this with Epic's messaging against Apple and Google about opening up billing on mobile platforms and major goals becomes very clear. One of these major goals can be a subscription service but to me it's obvious they're wanting to get into the artist -> individual creator/studio licensing environment for game/movie creators who already rely on Unreal.

The good news about this is that none of this should impact Bandcamp negatively, neither as a consumer or an artist, not unless you see more avenues to sell your music/merch as a bad thing. Bad news is your favorite Bandcamp artist will sell out ;)
Oh, stop. Ivermectin is a human drug. The fact that you're repeating this line shows that you're not commenting in good faith.

Quite literally, the evidence for both is equally good (or bad). Citing mechanistic or laboratory studies is absurd, when we have actual RCTs.
> I'm amazed at the futility of Godot's labor allocation sometimes.

In terms of C#, they did get funding of $USD24,000 for implementing it: https://godotengine.org/article/introducing-csharp-godot/#ac...

And while I'm no fan of the language I do see the strategic value in potentially providing a migration path from Unity.

> GDScript is a dead end,

Do you mean in terms of it being a "single use" language?

> and they're making their own physics engine?

I think it's significant to note that in both cases--creating a new language & a "new" physics engine--it wasn't necessarily their first choice.

As they've noted[0], they first used Lua & tried Python before creating GDScript.

And for Godot 3.0 they moved to using the 3rd party Bullet Physics engine[1] but decided for 4.0 to move the focus back to the custom physics engine--in part because Bullet had "a shift of focus...away from game development".

And in both cases they're developed the support in a modular fashion so that the defaults can be replaced (e.g. by Rust/Python/Nim and Bullet/Jolt) so everyone can be unhappy...or happy if they replace it by something they like, I guess. :D

FWIW I don't think anyone particularly wants to learn a single use language but the number of comments I've seen that go "Ugh, I didn't want to learn or use GDScript but it turns out I like it" is non-zero.

And, in my case, I can't argue with the results, even in GDScript for 3.0 the differences between Python & GDScript weren't huge & via the Editor integration it's just so easy to write...for the most part. (There's a reason I've spent so much time writing/using GDScript/FFI-bindings for pre-compiled library binaries--cos I'd rather write GDScript than any compiled language. :) )

With the improvements in gradual typing, optimization & quality-of-life features that come with GDScript for 4.0 it's even better. (As languages go I see Rust & GDScript actually make a nice pairing to move between--in part due to the nice `match`-based features in both.)

Also, they did just spend four years developing a Vulkan-based renderer, which does seem like something game developers care about.

Do you have any examples of what categories you see game developers caring more about that 4.0 hasn't improved on?

Godot as an engine & a project is definitely not without its faults but I don't think "futility" and "waste of time and effort" are particularly fair/generous characterizations of the labor allocation.

[0] https://docs.godotengine.org/en/4.0/about/faq.html#what-were...

[1] https://godotengine.org/article/godot-30-switches-bullet-3-p... (See note on page re: 4.0.)
This is not true. SVB had 91 billion in hold-to-maturity securities. These were auctioned off to other Banks. The FED did not take them.

If the Fed did take them, it would be a drop in the ocean. The FED is already holding 2.7 trillion dollars of underwater mortgage-backed securities they bought.

They have six trillion dollars of other securities they are holding.

Nobody can do a bank run on the Fed and they control the interest rate, so despite their colossal unrealized losses, they can wait it out.
That was very bad for the weavers. Well earning middle class jobs were replaced by toiling in the mills, It then took a few generations for the work act to put a 10hr maximum workday etc.

The luddites were trying to defend their livelihoods, communities etc. It's the same rational thing people are looking at now: How to survive
And YouTube is fast turning into everything that TV is.
It’s also not Photoshop. It’s the person making the non-trivial decisions about what to get the machine to do.
Relying on a free service for important work? Maybe they are right.
If that's true, I'm not sure I'm a lot less worried considering how Libya stores its Uranium :-(
I haven't used it much lately, but I opted for 500px. Similar to flickr
For now, while we only have a few small models, sure.

But models are inefficient and always will be by the nature of being general purpose.

You don’t need a language model to tell you about your carbon footprint report. You could just use some of your human brain time to understand instead.

Not saying that AI is inferior always to human Intelligence, but it’s much like driving a car vs walking. One is much faster, but has a much higher impact on the environment
If you want help with a kubernetes paas type setup, check out argonaut.dev

Disclaimer: I'm the founder
I wish this would stop being the default headline whenever any such scandal happens. It's low-effort and provocative, but ultimately meaningless. CEOs and other executives are always selling company stock, because the vast majority of their compensation happens via stock. People want to spend money and/or diversify it in other investments. There's no reason for anyone to hold a significant amount of vested company stock.

Plus, executive stock sales are all declared to the SEC well in advance and happen on a set schedule. You can go look up how many millions in company stock Satya Nadella or Tim Cook sold last month, but that doesn't automatically make it a scandal.
So wait, they're not ending Docker Free Teams any more? That's great news. Thanks to all the Docker team who realized what a horrible mistake this was.
> No. You're wrong. chatGPT only knows of text. It derives incomplete understanding of the world via text.

It doesn't understand anything. It combines symbols according to a probabilistic algorithm and you assign meaning to it.

> Why are you so stuck on this stupid concept?

Because you keep replying with statements indicating you are yet to grasp it.

> This is a bad analogy. I'm not claiming sentience. My claim is that it understands you.

There is just as much evidence for sentience as understanding.
I will make no defense of video game stories... but I find it laughable to hold up most "prestige" TV shows. How do the "prestige" video games hold up against most TV shows? :D

Putting charity to the claim, since you do have to interact with games, I could see how the thought could be that they are more mentally stimulating. Gambling, of course, gives the lie to that claim. Addictive does not mean productive, and all of that.

That said, why do so many folks obsess over productivity?
The biggest problem with non-completes is that they have been weaponized to suppress wages against people without resources to fight them. Fast food employees should never be subject to them; it's absolute lunacy that assembling a burger involves any truly special training or unique skill that a company should be able to prevent someone getting a better job across the street later that same day.

I'm not in favour of banning non-completes entirely since I think they actually serve some function for highly specialized and compensated positions, but I do want to see pretty high levels of regulation. Non-completes shouldn't be allowed for any position making less than 3x the median wage. Any position making less that that simply isn't special enough for a non-compete to actually be protecting actual secrets. Companies should also be required to buy out any non-complete time at the employee's total compensation rate, including the average of the last 2-5 years of bonuses (whichever timeframe is highest) and any additional perks (like health care in the US since that can be a huge expense).
It’s actually not a huge deal in practice.

I just put together a content style website using nothing but web components and used a base class to put my global styles into and just inherited my various components from it.

Was also really easy to factor out shareable styles like various page layouts using a similar technique.

That just left me with doing small targeted tweaks where I would override things with custom properties along the way as needed plus any component specific styles.

Was probably the cleanest approach I’ve had in as long as I could remember. Plus it was delivering me a perfect 100 score in Lighthouse too for what it’s worth. Would recommend.
Vite is great as a hot reload dev server and builder. I think it uses we pack under the hood but it's so seamless I never had to mess with that. I code and test with my full source but the build output is a single static index.html.
Ask HN: What are your successful open source projects you lost interest in?
React features 13 top level functions and 11 hooks. That remains an extremely small API for a frontend framework.
Women actually attempt suicide more. But because men tend to be more violent and aggressive, their suicide attempts succeed more often.
It wasn't a good opportunity though. Their mortgage-backed securities were making 1.56%. All that risk for 1.56%? I understand that it was hard to find good investments at the time, but that doesn't mean you have to run out and buy bad ones.
Cosmicomics is excellent. A beautiful blend of science and fantasy. So poetic.
She was hired last April on a 12 month contract (recruiters tend to be LTE rather than FTE) and Meta claimed that the hiring program was fully funded.

From a different article ( https://wapo.st/3lmVr6w ):

> Levy, who is Mexican American, agreed to start the 12-month gig in April after she checked with Meta that her position would be secure for the duration of the program despite the company’s financial challenges. She was told that the program, which aimed to improve the pipeline of recruiters who focus on diversity, was fully funded for the year.
I work at a small company, but it’s hard for me to imagine that generative AI will replace predictive AI/ML any time soon.

Smaller models trained supervised/in-domain are simply more efficient and more accurate than unsupervised/out-of-domain. Plus we own and operate the technology much more cheaply.

I don’t doubt that if your were trying to build a competing product to what OpenAI is doing that you’d feel affected, but there’s also a lot of other problems that are not being solved by generative models.
Face it, you're on heavy damage control and it just seems... untrustworthy.
Do what you want, but I would recommend not doing this, because it ruins things for the Argentinian people. Same thing happened to video games: https://www.reddit.com/r/Steam/comments/ydkeb1/new_regional_...
Show HN: Acquire 3X more customers with ChatGPT
No need to trust it -- that's the best part.

I tend to trust blogs or conversations with other people more than I should. The benefit of a tool like ChatGPT is that I already distrust it, and I tend to double-check more often what it responds.

I agree with you, but the comparison and fine-tuning GP mentioned are really areas where it's an unparalleled tool right now. Dismissing it in fear of "contaminating your understanding" is missing out on what the tool may offer to you. It's not really that much worse than a search query.
Fair. Maybe let’s look at it a different way. The computer is a solution to N known problems and M unknown problems at the time of creation. I’d say the N/M ratio is vanishing small.
There's no authoritatively correct reference for what "slow" or "fast" should mean in extraterrestrial contexts, however, I think it makes sense to look at it like this:

Suppose you were watching a (CGI) movie or a video of a meteor hitting Earth, with the whole globe on screen.

The diameter of the Earth is almost 13,000 km. So a meteor(oid) going even 70 km/s is going to take 3 minutes to hit from one diameter away.

It should look like it's barely moving on a planetary scale.
The value of those bonds is less than what it says on the balance sheet. They were not able to sell them at price X meaning they are no longer worth that much. The rate on those bonds is less than inflation, meaning keeping them to maturity won't recover original value.
No, they aren't. Just look at Wikipedia, it's a common enough misconception that the page for right-to-work directs people to at-will employment: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-to-work_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At-will_employment
Quite interesting, thank you for sharing. In one of your tutorials (https://docs.fluxninja.com/tutorials/integrations/flow-contr...), you've mentioned that the policy uses latency-based AIMD concurrency limiting; is there a plan to implement a PID (something similar) component in the future? This would be useful to smooth out the adjustments.
If Amelkin works for YADRO, could he not know his company got sanctioned? It's pretty big thing to happen, and judging from his LinkedIn comments, he knows it. Yet he writes the suspension was "without any explanation whatsoever". I think he knows the explanation, he doesn't like it but it's no mystery to anyone.
strikes, or the credible threat of a strike, is the only power a union has. well except for the dues paid but those usually just go to a handful of pockets.
> First SVB was bailed out by FDIC funds which all banks pay into.

And from where this money is coming from you think? From you and me and everyone else because costs of doing business are transferred to clients, so to the whole society because almost everyone have a bank account.
I wouldn’t call video games more sophisticated or intellectual, but they do require you to use your brain in a way that is not strictly necessary for watching TV.
This is true, but I dont think high school was ever intended to be preparing kids for the labor market; I thought it was to teach a basic education for understanding the world.
> your ping time to google.com is no different than mine

That's gotta be the best comeback I've ever read on this site.
React will never die. It‘s as pervasive than jQuery and has been for a while now.
AAA is a bit dodgy these days. Lots of filler content and poor writing. Indies have a wider variance of quality but there’s usually a handful every year that are superb. Gaming definitely has been taking a back seat in my life the past few years though. Except Elden Ring. I loved my time there, bloated as the game is at times.
Of course, and we all write extremely plainly and without context.
I used the "may" word as I wasn't sure it's something we are meant to be disclosing, but now that the cat is out of the bag you are indeed 100% correct and this matches my experience.

One thing I didn't appreciate with these rules from a candidate perspective (and encouraged my decision not to continue my onboarding with Karat), there seems to be no way to learn from the process. I actually bombed my practice interview (and knew it would happen even before the interview) but the interviewer was very reluctant (due to the above rules) to actually solve the problem with me, where as a conventional non-Karat failed interview would at least give me the solution in the end and I'd at least learn something.
The Cynical Reason College Applications Are Surging
Being pedantic, both have AOT compilers readily available.

But sure, though I don’t really buy the argument that JIT compilers would “severely limit” the type of optimizations - there is no significant performance difference - if any - between AOT compiled managed languages and JIT-compiled ones. Sure, there are more constraints in case of a JIT, but it’s not like going in the other direction and letting gcc/clang chew 10x time more on the same program would give you a significant speedup, if any. Speculations (which are not possible AOT) may even reverse the fields.

D, Haskell, OCaml, Go are all in the same ballpark as Java and C#, and even JS, hell, they may be better.
Ironically the best way to learn these terms is to ask ChatGPT.
>I'm glad that energy is becoming more expensive

Glad to know you are not struggling financially in any way.
That’s interesting, I have never seen that. I get almost all of my spam from VoIP numbers in the same area code as my number.
These assets will all be redeemable for par value when they mature. The only impairment they have is that they pay less interest in the interim than other available bonds, because their rates were locked in before the interest rate spike.
> These models, by nature, can only produce derivative mimicry. Humans are capable of generating spontaneous concepts and employing meta-qualities [...]

It's even more complicated than that. "derivative mimicry" and "meta-qualities" are both subjective value judgements you are making, and you're implicitly asking us to go along with them as given.

Human output is also derivative. AI output also has meta-qualities. The real difference is that one is made by a person, the other is made by a person using a tool.

> To replace this process with an ML implementation devalues humanity

Maybe there will be a time where machines will - without any human action involved at all - generate content, put it online, autonomously interact with other machine-generated content, and there will be a closed system where humans are either not involved or are just passive consumers. In that case, yes, humans have clearly fallen completely by the wayside. Which, depending on the nature of those interacting autonomous systems, may be the start of a whole new civilization. Or just electrons chasing each other in circuits that are endlessly recombining the ghostly echoes of their long forgotten makers.

However, that day is not today. We have made more capable content generators and generative tools, and amazingly, have democratized them to a degree.
To be fair, Salesforce bought Heroku in 2010, just three years after it was founded. Much of the innovation at Heroku happened under the Salesforce umbrella.
You probably won‘t answer, but what do you think of the (imo uncalled for) wishful thinking that react should‘ve stayed in the direction of Class components?
This is why I believe that they changed what would happen after the pushback and are trying to hide that they changed.

In reality they were probably just going to disable access to updating all along and then maybe someday delete things, but didn’t want to say exactly that.
Open-source data multitool – VisiData
The dev ops potential is inspiring. Log diving can be so frustrating/cumbersome/tedious.
The typescript language server does a great job supporting rename refactors for string unions. It doesn't get much easier than that and is no harder than string enums, in my view.

(I've done crazy things like use emoji named types in string unions and then used F2 to rename refactor them to a different emoji or name and not needed to worry if it missed any emoji literals.)

The only thing missing from both string enums and string unions is something to support [Symbol.iterator]() to iterate through the available options, but at this point I find that easier to write DRY with string union types (especially with typeof/keyof meta-magic) rather than string enums.
I don't disagree with the value of videogames, but I'm sure that my grandma could say the same about (some of?) her soap operas/doramas.
For sure. I just trust Backblaze more.
Tools like deepL and Google translate have absolutely put casual translators and part-time translators out of a job. GPT and tools like whisper that can do automatic speech recognition and instant translation will make that even worse.

There will always be a need for careful human translation work in such things as legal documents for government work but those positions will become even more competitive.
Gave me a genuine chuckle when I saw his daily word vs my own. Great game and really fun.
People don’t need a lot of things. However certain foods, like animal products including milk, lead to optimal health. That’s how the Dutch got so tall. So you can drink your diluted nut or grain water. I’ll stick with bioavailable nutrients from animal foods.
Yes I meant type annotations. To be honest, given a choice, I opt for JavaScript. I personally don't find the benefit of TS is worth than all the extra work it requires, to make what is a dynamic language, not so dynamic. Why go for Python/JavaScript/Ruby if the first thing one does is to eliminate what makes it Python/JavaScript/Ruby? (Well, in the case of JavaScript, granted there's little choice available).
We don't have any concrete reason to support that an AGI would harm humans.

We do have concrete reasons to support that AGI will save millions of lives with advances in medicine and healthcare and a ton of other stuff.

Until we have literally any evidence to support harmful AGI motivations, I think we should work towards #2
> We are happily on AWS now.

Hate to break it to you but you've always been on AWS ;)
Middlemen would likely sell to the companies or be puppets from the outset.
Like it a lot! The animation and interface are nice. Couple things... I wish the browser back button worked from the options page (instead of taking me off the site). Also, why is it asking to read the contents of my clipboard?
You'd have to ensure they didn't have any privileges, for a start. E.g. you have to ensure you set the role correctly so they can't execute other lambdas in your account, etc.

If you are running multiple users on the same lambda, one could potentially read filesystem data that another saved, for example (if the lambda hasn't restarted).

You also probably want to make sure each user has individual compute limits, so one user can't execute 1000 scripts/second and DDOS other users.

There's probably a lot of little things to think through (that I have not).
It's possible to run a full GPT-3 style language model on any device with 4GB of RAM now, so running models on consumer devices is getting more and more feasible by the day. https://simonwillison.net/2023/Mar/11/llama/
Wonder if it will only be a 5x increase if those LLMs and other workloads run on ARM or RISC =D
Sorry, I’m already moving onto other repository options and also to `podman` as an alternative that cover 99% of my use cases.

I won’t be caught up againg by Docker SNAFU.
This bank panic should not exist
For anyone unfamiliar, docopt is an established standard for specifying arguments in a script’s doc string. I use it for Python and it’s lovely. You’re going to write a docstring with examples anyway, why not make them functional?

http://docopt.org/
Pretty much yes.

Though I’d pay a lot more than I did for my laptop, it’s that good. I regularly see other machines get rated and do try them out but the hardware (trackpad in particular) is never anything like as nice.

It works fine with a nas.

Each to their own.
This. I would never use a native app for any sort of social media. I do for my bank though. I trust my bank (they already have my money); I would never trust Facebook or Twitter or TikTok.
Hadn't heard of that but built something similar by adapting tutorials from adafruit for their microcontrollers, lcds, air quality sensors, starting with https://learn.adafruit.com/adafruit-trinkey-qt2040