skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Interesting (yet unsurprising) point when you ask an AI tool to depict an assistant that it generally provides female likeness: "Unfortunately, all imaginary assistant characters are depicted as human and primarily female-looking, which can be seen as a gender bias."

bum bum bum the future is here and it's perpetuating biases even further, yippee

Anyways, great work with this walkthrough, it's fun to be a passenger as you go through the explorations with each of the tools and what works well vs what doesn't.
> Or did you literally just try to make up something that the EU can do then use it to praise the EU and bash the US?

The flamebait tone is unnecessary and is against the spirit of discussion here at HN as well as the rules, I'd kindly ask you to chill it a bit here.

This isn't legislation that exists, this is me suggesting they should pass legislation, which is obvious from the ordinary context of my comment.

Feels bad-faith but to give you the benefit of the doubt, if you are asking me to provide a track record of the EU's previous pro-consumer legislation, some examples would be phone connector/cable standardization, charger standardization, mandatory warranties, etc.
Why would I do that when I can get a bail from the Fed for free?

So, no, there's no better choice :)
I would say (imo) most of the target market of this Hummer EV are not the people who are primarily concerned about environmental damage. One could argue that this encourages people who are driving ICE-equivalent cars to make the jump to EV. I'm sure there are numbers on which is "less bad", I just have no idea what they are or what tradeoffs are being considered. I live in an area with a lot of smog, where the highest contributor to the local pollution is emission from ICE vehicles and there's a culture of rolling coal. I absolutely hate the people who make the modifications to their cars to pollute more but if this vehicle would convince them to switch to an EV, I think I'm for it! It's more on the theme of harm-reduction for me personally.

I actually am less concerned about the environmental damage that this EV would cause than I am about the precedent ("now that you're not limited by gas prices, you can get a giant truck!!") and the inevitable rise in pedestrian and bike deaths (and probably car deaths as well, as how many sedans are going to fare well against a car accident with this thing?).
For many economies that's a possibility, but the Swiss Franc has a much larger circulation than proportional to economic fundamentals (like the pound and dollar). That has to do with the perceived stability of the currency. Normally, a run on a currency doesn't work because it's locally used, but as seen in the collapse of the pound in 92 that made Soros a household name, it could. That would force much higher interest rates in Switzerland (or politically unacceptable inflation).
They should not be allowed to lie and say their technology "enhances details". This is not a TV show and there are no details to be enhanced.
Now we're going back with a plan. Not just to win the space race, but to start laying the foundation for a permanent moon base that we can use as a way point for going to Mars.

The financial woes of the 70's combined with the substantial cost overruns of the Shuttle Craft killed Congress' appetite for further investment. Modern technology has substantially lowered the costs so we've revived the idea.
I would love to see compiler integration with Zed. Like be able to hit run and it runs my rust code.
I'm italian too, I don't consider Italy a peer of G7 countries, or even G20
The comparison between the context length and what humans can hold in their heads just seems faulty.

I'm not sure I can agree that humans cannot hold 25,000 words worth of information in their heads. For the average person, if they read 25,000 words, which can be done in a single sitting, they're not going to remember all of it, for sure, but they would get a lot out of it that they could effectively reason with and manipulate.

Not to mention that humans don't need to hold the entire report in their head because they can hold it in their hand and look at it.

And if anything, I think it's more significant to have a bigger working memory for GPT's own outputs than it is for the inputs. Humans often take time to reflect on issues, and we like to jot down our thoughts, particularly if it involves complex reasoning. Giving something long, careful thought allow us to reason much better.
But surfs the web how? With prompts? So a search engine with one answer?

How would it work on a site like this?
The added complexity of a hybrid flying and driving machine doesn’t really seem like its worth the added fuel savings (if any)
Eating 2,294kcal for $5.20/day on the ex150 diet
Some numbers here: https://github.com/qwopqwop200/GPTQ-for-LLaMa#result
Afaik, the Llama sampler needs to be tuned to get more sensible outputs.

https://twitter.com/theshawwn/status/1632569215348531201
It's not in the cloud, this is all done on-device. They have a moon detection AI model that they pass the image through, the output of which is then used to set up and then run the moon enhancement model, which fills in the detail from moon images it's been trained upon.

These are part of a larger package of super-resolution models and processing pipeline that Samsung licenses from ArcSoft, a computational photography software company that specialises in mobile devices.
I'm aware it's still a very labor intensive process. But there seems to be great potential for improvement with Tesla-esque automation processes if the capital investments are worth it.

The main disadvantage about physical objects vs software is that physical objects are not as easily scalable and matter is generally more expensive than bits... so the economy of scale is harder to exploit. But give it some years once the marginal utility of software decreases to a point, I think people will divert more focus (and more importantly capital) on automating hardware stuff.
They could just actually sell things instead. As in, sell for real, not some at-our-discretion lease. Nobody's forcing companies to gate access and add DRM and all that. Such a change probably wouldn't result in perpetual hosting, but in actually selling things. Or, in only providing rentals. Either way, the situation would be clearer to the end user.
Why did you decide to do your comparison against that totally arbitrary point in time? Basically, anyone can play the game you're playing. Objectively, from its All Time High, BTC is down 70% - and has moved in lockstep with other over-valued meme stocks.

I can't even --
Appreciate your questions and feedback. There's nothing wrong with some healthy skepticism. Ultimately this solution depends on the tech and implementation but it also requires a degree of user trust. I've been happy to see both Fastly and Google being pretty transparent about what's going on and how it works, in order to start establishing that trust.

I can't speak to your points about Google specifically, but I have appreciated in my interactions with the Privacy Sandbox team that they are putting a lot of energy in to delivering these services while also respecting user privacy.

On the Fastly side, I see an opportunity to deliver OHTTP services for a bunch of additional use cases and to other customers. I think this could be a powerful tool to enable privacy for all sorts of things, like metrics and log collection and other kinds of API access. The spec right now needs the client to know various things which requires a tight coupling between client -> relay -> gateway -> target, but I think that there are ways that could be adjusted in future revisions. And not all of the opportunities that I'm exploring are for commercial entities, to your point about NGOs.

I'm also working on some other privacy enablement services, like Fastly Privacy Proxy (which is one of the underlying providers for Apple's iCloud Private Relay) and some un-announced things. Between these various technologies I think that Fastly can help to raise the level across the industry for end user privacy.

Ultimately we are a business and we like making money. I think we can do that in this space by delivering real value to our customers and their end users via these building block services that help them to build privacy enabled products. I'm hopeful that, as we explore more opportunities in this space and OHTTP adoption increases, user trust continues to be built in both the OHTTP technology and Fastly's privacy enablement services.
> It is economics 101.

Please explain to me what happens to a sweep account when the primary bank fails. Asking for a friend, who quite literally tried to get an answer to this over the weekend. Also, I asked this question in the Mercury thread where the founders were responding to questions and got no answer.

And apologies, but I added an edit before I saw your comment. But in that edit, I explain how the sweep account was of little comfort during this SVB debacle. If they had needed to make payroll on Friday, they would have missed it. And while the FDIC has restored access to 100% of funds thanks to the intervention, it is still unclear how and when they would have gotten access to the sweep accounts in the case of no intervention.
It’s sure a good thing we let them run their own App Store for Apple products then.

Definitely a win for the little guy. /s
I agree, they just handed Apple a huge moral victory. You fight publicly and sue for your own payment process, then you turn around and scam your users with dark patterns around payment. This would not have been possible with iAP!
As far as I know, US Mobile is the only one other than Verizon-owned Visible that has some allocation of data at equivalent priority to Verizon postpaid customers.
The python implementation[1] ran some tests using the same quantization algorithm as llama.cpp (4 bit RTN).

1: https://github.com/qwopqwop200/GPTQ-for-LLaMa
Have you ever logged into messages.google.com?
It doesn't have to be quite as simplistic. You can give them choices. There could be IP escrow companies you could pay. You can give them the choice of hosting in perpetuity or releasing something on some date. You can tie all these choices to a tax structure, progressive charges, etc. You could make the cheapest thing to simply sell the product outright. In theory you could even tie these additional protections to the a condition of making the release public at some point as a way of incentivizing companies not to use copyright protection on something that is not likely to be that valuable in 95 years, though that's unrealistically utopian of me to suggest.

My main point is that it doesn't have to be that simplistic.
The ironic thing is that HN is actually biased towards libertarians and bernie bros, it only feels like it's heavily democrat because those groups don't like a lot of republican policy either.
Or create a pipeline of young talent who can come from university already trained on their system.
Great choice of color, that lunar dust smudges are a pain to get out of the old white suites.
I'm still amazed that Apple invests so much into every other bit of hardware on a high end phone, yet always gives you the bare minimum amount of RAM they can get away with.

There are so many use cases (like this) that require more RAM. And even if a use case doesn't theoretically require more RAM, getting a developer to dedicate time to optimizing RAM is time taken away from making a wonderful app.
At this point every studio has their own renderer, Pixar has RenderMan, Illumination has one from MacGuff, Disney has their Hyperion, and Animal Logic has Glimpse.
we will have the fresh picked one for people to cure at home, and some choice snacks and herbs to enjoy onsite. Probably also a cooperation with local bakeries for the munchies :)

so far, it is nothing but a dream, however we own a pretty decent plot of land where you can't build anything because it is in a water protection zone. great soil, though.
Some of the systems remain pay-to-play for sure. We have adopted the consultant model where we are implementing our solution on behalf of our customers. This is why we require our customers to have their own relationship with each PMS. Their credentials are used to access each API. I sent a connect request to you on LI - happy to chat in more detail!
Hell of a license:

----

INVESTIGATIONS, MONITORING, & NO OBLIGATION TO PRE-SCREEN CONTENT. Zed may, but is not obligated to, investigate, monitor, pre-screen, remove, refuse, or review the Service and/or Content, including Your Content and User Content, at any time. By entering into the Agreement, you hereby provide your irrevocable consent to such monitoring. You acknowledge and agree that you have no expectation of privacy concerning the transmission of Your Content, including without limitation chat, text, or voice communications. In the event that Zed pre-screens, refuses or removes any Content, you acknowledge that Zed will do so for Zed’s benefit, not yours.

----

Irrevocable consent.
Yeah I don't understand it either.

This is a classic prisoner's dilemma. Thiel just happened to be one of the first VCs to tell portfolio companies to get their money out. If [another VC name] had done so, it'll be their name on these articles. The point being, whoever went first avoided massive pain, so someone would've started it.
It would be great if GPT-3.5 could remember everything it did as part of this project. So if you ask it a week later, you won't need to clarify the context.
I hope you've never used the power grid or parcel shipping, as those are heavily optimized using symbolic AI.
Germany, Luxembourg and Slovakia use a modern train, although they do show it at an angle or head-on and with track, which will help distinguish it from a truck.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_European_road_si...
From the readme, to preempt the moaning: "I just like collecting imaginary internet points, in the form of little stars, that people seem to give to me whenever I embark on pointless quests for rewriting X thing, but in Rust."

OK? Just don't. Let us have this. :)
This is a is a fundamental change of how we relate to work and the economy. So I hope it catches on and I've seriously though about emigrating because of that. That weather though...

I think it doesn't go quite far enough though. I still believe a universal basic income would do better and be easier to administer.
Yeah, car makers have never designed fundamentally buggy and insecure digital systems before. Definitely stretches credulity!
Thanks! the GitHub page includes a lot of (imo) essential information that should be included on the site. The developer clearly did a lot more research than I assumed.

That said, one thing to consider if you're using this stack is that this implementation will produce OS specific designs. The fonts in each stack differ significantly between operating systems, which means that testing for each OS will be necessary. I already have an issue with the same fonts looking different due to different rendering methods in each browser/ OS.
Companies going out of business is a different thing but Amazon, Google, and Epic are not in any risk of going out of business.

If you're worried about shell-company games, well, that can be legislated against too. So far the EU hasn't, as far as I'm aware, let any companies out of any previously-mandated penalties for violating consumer protection with "That was google, this is ABC" bullshit. They are, as I stated, much much less interested in playing games than the US is.
Use lettuce as the bun and ditch bread completely.
EU isn’t that unfair for companies, it is more likely that they would allow revoking of access rights, but require companies to compensate for thr damages (e.g. issue a refund for the full or partial purchase amount)
Afaik that TPU has only 8MB of RAM to fit models, you'd have to continuously stream the weights - can't imagine that's workable.
Thank you both for nurturing such architectural concepts by putting Mr Cox in historical context.
If they were obviously more popular, that's what we would do. But usually it is all just a big mess of erosion and there isn't any obviously most-popular path.
Wow completely forgot about crossing the chasm, good call
It's not discussed here, but banks probably couldn't increase their interest rates to be competitive with money market accounts etc because the whole root cause of the problem is that their deposits were backed up with long-term fixed interest rate bonds that paid substantially below the rate that someone could get by buying a bond now, and therefore below the return on money market accounts etc. How bad of a problem this is depends on how sensitive to interest rates the banks' customers actually are.
Used to be with Visible up until a few months ago, but their issues with deprioritization started to make it almost unusable. I'd often look at my phone and have 3-4 bars, but nothing would load. Speed tests indicated data in the kilobytes range or just failed.

Switched to US Mobile (which as long as you have a 5G capable phone, puts you on their high-priority QoS tier) and haven't had an issue since.
As someone who does a lot of work with non-profits who typically can't afford having a technical person on site/staff I'm really curious what type of self-service IT support services can come from self hosted LLMs.

I'd love to be able to feed all my documentation about a network layout into one and be able to get answers about it.
I am not so sure,

there seems to be accumulating evidence that "finding the optimal solutions" means (requires) building a world model. Whether it's consistent with ground truth probably depends on what you mean by ground truth.

Given the hypothesis that the optimal solution for deep learning presented with a given training set, is to represent (simulate) the formal systemic relationships that generated that set, by "modeling" such relationships (or discovering non-lossy optimized simplifications),

I believe an implicit corollary, that the fidelity of simulation is only bounded by the information in the original data.

Prediction: a big enough network, well enough trained, is capable of simulating with arbitrary fidelity, an arbitrarily complex system, to the point that lack of fidelity hits a noise floor.

The testable bit of interest being whether such simulations predict novel states and outcomes (real world behavior) well enough.

I don't see why they shouldn't, but the X-factor would seem to be the resolution and comprehensiveness of our training data.

I can imagine toy domains like SHRDLU which are simple enough that we should be able to build large models well enough already to "model" them and tease this sort of speculation experimentally.

I hope (assume) this is already being done...
We’re talking about future bitcoin world, not the past.

> Many truckers now can’t cash out their donated bitcoin due to financial sanctions, with some of the bitcoins being seized from NobodyCaribou by the authorities.

”What are you saying, that I can convert bitcoin to dollars with impunity?”

“No, Neo - I’m saying that when you’re ready, you won’t have to.”
Because then there would be no reason for SLS, and all the jobs it creates.

At this point it's widely accepted the SLS design is already obsolete with no reuse, is wildly expensive, and is extremely delayed.

But it creates a lot of jobs in areas where congressmen want to get reelected, so they keep it going.

Sooner or later it will die and Starship will take over, but it's going milk many more billions before then.
Looks like archive.org has added an anti-bot wall, and poor old me on my iphone don’t qualify as human
llama.cpp is using RTN at the moment.
Yes, and what I'm saying is that EVs could make this trend even worse.
after the era of low hanging fruits of generative AI will be over I'm sure there will be a return to other approaches
Tethering is less restricted on MVNO's because often they can't do anything to stop you anyway. I've been tethering on prepaid plans for over ten years now without issues, and without paying anything extra for it.
What is not transparent in the cross-entropy loss used in a large number of deep nets?
I'm going to be slightly more blunt and say, if you're using a font "stack" then you don't care about typography at all. A large segment of HN seems to hate web fonts with a passion. And I get that. But let's not pretend you can have your cake and eat it too. You may as well just do "serif" or "sans-serif" and be done with it.

For the same amount of effort it takes to research a font stack you could implement a web font loader that uses browser fonts based on prefers-reduced-motion.
Personally I think the text decreases understanding, since it's using a very unusual abbreviation.
> but I wouldn't be surprised if that was a short term move and in the long run it will become more open again.

Naive people is why such strategies works.
Closed-source editor built on a closed-source framework, telemetry built-in with no documented opt-out, hardcoded language servers, macOS only.
I play Civ VI on my tablet to wind down, and I’m not happy about owning the whole thing on Steam and only half on iOS. They need a license transference process.

If memory serves Klei might have a solution for this but I haven’t bought anything on steam in some time so I may be thinking of some other game.
I have to agree, I was 11 years old when Apollo 11 landed, I thought that by now you could fly there in something like an airplane or that we would have been to Mars. It feels a bit disappointing for sure.
You said "There's no option to chose for better insurance otherwise I'd already have taken" and "Making better choices is the best insurance". You're now arguing, it seems, the opposite.

If you think the FDIC will always insure depositors over their statutory limits, by all means, make that choice, but don't complain you don't have one.
Interview with GPT-4 Creator Ilya Sutskever
Ehh.

How much money should I spend on my hobbies, 35$ isn't a lot, but I'd rather not waste it.

Plus instead of just grabbing the image I come up with to do x or y, you'll have to implement it yourself. Duplicate this hundreds or thousands of times.
Nope sublime still feels faster, better with far more language support.
Qt publishes opensource versions a year after the commercial LTS release due to an agreement with KDE. 5.15.8 is the most recent opensource version available at https://download.qt.io/archive/qt/5.15/5.15.8/single/. 5.15.9 commercial was released in April 2022 and so a 5.15.9 opensource would be expected April 2023.
Before the money is actually in the bank but is reliable because SVB partners with the VC firm responsible for leading the round who vouches?
The difference is, a diet high in (refined) sugar is terrible for all humans, both healthy and unhealthy.
Cudos first of all on taking on such a big challenge, and seeming to do a good job of it.

As someone who uses a lot of VSC plugins and commands I can't imagine switching any time soon (also no Windows support makes it a non starter for me personally) - but I can still be super impressed!
How does this compare to Pulsar-Edit?

https://pulsar-edit.dev/
I felt burned by the loss of Atom. Why is this project going to be different?
You can use AI to validate things, i.e. to check that they conform to some specification.

You may twist the language to say that they are generating a list of validations and errors, but even then it's definitely a different use case than merely creating new items.
That's max! One of the Zed Industries cofounders :D
GPT4 and the Multi-Modal, Multi-Model, Multi-Everything Future of AGI
I mean, Mac/iOS App Store apps are already sandboxed and easily distributable.

Windows, Android, and Linux all have stores/package managers and I assume/hope some level of sandboxing.
> Give ... time

That's, I think, the heart of these economic dislocation problems. The destination is fine, but the transition is painful.
It might be even easier than being paid back full value (which is difficult). How about you still have your account but you can no longer purchase anything else?