skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Available for free online in many places, for example:

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/fc-industrial-societ...

I agree very much with Teddy about the problem but I don't condone his solution. I don't have a better one though.
That’s just standard web handling of white space, isn’t it?

Or do you mean something different?
I'm honestly more surprised that any social media apps were ever allowed on government devices.
It is so ironic, that Facebook, the once sponsor of gems like Farmville to playfully interact with people and fostering discussions around lunch photos, totally lost sight of community building.

While today everybody wants to integrate GPT-4 into a customer facing app to increase community interaction and value to the customer, the company famous for its social graph has nothing to offer to foster integration or community building.

Even bing, the somewhat competitor now finally is the new shiny object and a direct thread to Google.

While Meta still wants to build its Metaverse, people immerse into everything that gets connected to GPT-4. GPT-4 is the real metaverse.

Ironic. Somewhat.
Haha, good one.

If one's aim is to look like the smartest in the room, he should not create an AGI that will make him look as inteligent as a monkey in comparison.
https://archive.ph/holxb
I've done that during exceptionally busy times, like dorm moving day. If I wait for the elevator to be going my way on its return, it will already be full and I'll be left standing in the hall.

Of course, I think everyone's probably done it at least once simply due to inattentiveness.
If he was a FDIC decisionmaker, then yes he would have needed to recuse.

He's the governor of CA and the FDIC just stopped major portions of california's economy from exploding. Of course he'd going to cheer that. It would be extremely odd and out of place for him not to cheer an action that likely prevented millions of californians from being out of work in a week or two.

Big surprise that he is also touched by something that has a direct or immediate but indirect effect on ALL californians.
"The existence of ChatGPT does not necessarily make people confidently incorrect."

- ChatGPT
The problem with using real exams as benchmarks is that they are often quite similar over several years. So they only make sense if you don't train on them also (previous editions of course).
Not exactly. I was born and raised in Bulgaria, but my direct ancestors did run a printing house, as well as a lot of revolutionary work, in Macedonia during the late 19th and early 20th century. So I would have been a Macedonian if not for the violent suppression of the Ilinden-Preobrazhenie uprising :) Additionally, what bothers me with the "Bulgarian perspective" is that Bulgaria chickened out on Macedonia on multiple occasions, yet some people go around saying "Macedonia is Bulgarian". Well, you can't have your cake and eat it, right? After the Young Turk Revolution, even my family (Bulgarians through and through) seems to have gotten frustrated with Bulgarian politics and started leaning towards independent Macedonia. So, I'm totally okay with the situation as-it-is.

As for Balkan people being half-Turk, I have to disagree. You probably meant the Bulgars? They were some 30,000 men and their families, and were quickly assimilated into the local population (mostly slavicized, romanized Thracians). Check out the yDNA/mDNA haplogroups for Bulgarian (or Macedonian, they're almost the same) people, then compare this to (for example) Tatars, and you'll quickly see there's not much in common.

Sorry for the wall of text, but since you asked.. :)
Yes.

Marcan, Asahi Lina, and related folks have been working on improving 3d accelerations. It's good enough for desktop use and some gaming so far, games like tuxracer, video playback, minecraft, etc. First the driver was in user space in python, then in the kernel with rust, and recent improvements have increased parallelism (from Lina) and removing Mailboxes (from Marcan).

OpenGL and Vulkan compliance has been increasing. Last I heard OpenGL was at 99-100% (almost all tests passing) and Vulkan wasn't as good, but improving. I believe Alyssa Rosen is doing much of that work.

Last published update I've seen is:
https://asahilinux.org/2022/12/gpu-drivers-now-in-asahi-linu...

There are some posts on Twitter and/or Mastodon, and regular updates on YouTube from "Asahi Lina" and Marcan, often by Live stream and Patreon.

Oh, and Neal Gompa is working on getting the GPU working with Fedora. One problem is most ARM linux distros default to 4k pages. But the GPU (which shares memory with the CPU) requires 16k pages. Seems like a performance win (less TLB thrashing), with a marginal increase in memory use.
What example English words would you give as a guide for pronouncing the words?
I wouldn't really call Khan Academy a tech giant. They are a charity.

That said, it does not necessarily seem like OpenAI is trying to be fair.
It is a way to interact with their chat api: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/chat/introduction

It already exists, but according to their docs current chatGPT "does not always pay strong attention to system messages. Future models will be trained to pay stronger attention to system messages"
Congrats on the launch Nabla!
Who is using ChatGPT in a medical field (serious question), knowing that it only displays very shallow level of knowledge on specific topic?
Java's Collections Framework Gets a Makeover with New Sequenced Collection Types
Very cool. And if you're interested in this sort of thing, I would recommend taking a look at remix.run as well. They go a bit farther and pull these concepts into a framework where it's straightforward to describe the client/server relationship in this style
> If, during training, some collection of weights exist along the gradient that approximate cognition

What do you mean? Is cognition a set of weights on a gradient? Cognition involves conscious reasoning and understanding. How do you know it is computable at all? There are many things which cannot be computed by a program (e.g. whether an arbitrary program will halt or not)...
I mean I agree it's been made pointlessly complicated. But this is all born out of the fact that everything we do in the US we insist on finding silly ways to insert unnecessary private middle men. But the fixes people are calling for with national healthcare policies like Medicare For All are precisely to do away with the problems you bring up AND extend the resulting system to everyone. I think a good start is just doing away with the things you bring up even if it's just for 65+ at least.

FWIW I am on Medicare (due to disability) and I expletive love the experience compared to the gold plated, Silicon Valley tech company, private insurance I had before I became eligible. I've not had to think about a prior-auth or appeal in the entire time. I've had no reduction in the doctors I can see (I saw specialists across the country). And I receive about $8,000 of specialty drugs a month without any questions.
I assume the one from the research page would work:

"You are a tutor that always responds in the Socratic style. You never give the student the answer, but always try to ask just the right question to help them learn to think for themselves. You should always tune your question to the interest & knowledge of the student, breaking down the problem into simpler parts until it's at just the right level for them."

From: https://openai.com/research/gpt-4
Are they going to open up image uploading to chat.openai.com ? or will it only be available thru api access?
Good point, this is why we finetune Whisper with our own medical dataset to improve the performance
Their press release says that Duolingo is using an improved custom version of GPT-4. I certainly hope so, for their sake.
What's important to understand is that certifications can be used in different ways by different industries.

Some use them as a minimum requirement for performing certain jobs. In such a case, listing certifications is valuable not because it says you are any good at your job, but because it shows simply that you meet the minimum requirements to be legally employed in your profession.

The other way they are used is as a marker of expertise. This is almost always misguided. Advertising one's certification status where none is required conveys a sense of insecurity, need for social approval, and overly strong attachment to formal procedures.

That does not mean you cannot learn something from a certification course - by all means! But true experts are always judged by their results, not by their certs.
It will start with the "areas we can all agree on" and then scope creep will occur. This is the safest prediction I feel I've ever made.
LLM/GPT* Wikipedia Policy
Can Khan Academy replace school at this point? If not, what are they missing?
Is anybody compiling a list of errors specific to GPT-4?

This has been a great resource to-date:

https://github.com/giuven95/chatgpt-failures
I’m using Plausible (https://plausible.io) and it’s great, breath of fresh air compared to GA.
https://www.openssl.org/news/cl31.txt has a more detailed changelog.
Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback does come from a version of the alignment problem: it's intended to prevent the horrible corporate and research PR problems caused by Tay (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(bot)), for example.
>'go woke go broke'...which is what happened to SVB

Jesus Christ, people actually believe this shit?
You're adding the implication that it needs to beat the "best" to be passable, if you could pay an agi 1% of the salary of the "best" to get an average quality, is that not accomplishing the goal without moving the goalposts?

By their marketing along, OpenAI has moved the goalposts more than anything else. They've managed to lower the bar of agi from "artificial general intelligence" to "regurgitates and recombines to form passable outputs with enough labelled training data".
https://www.msc.org/what-you-can-do/eat-sustainable-seafood/...

Herring is a good bet long term. China will fish the Pacific to death.
You don't know how the LSAT works, do you? It's not a memorization test. It has sections that test reading comprehension and logical thinking.
> Socializing the losses among banks reduces the incentive for the industry to pursue lobbying efforts that are misaligned with the general public.

That's not true. Individual banks will push for lower regulations because their execs want a chance at fat profits that they get to take a slice of. Just like SVB did.

>It also directly refutes the wrong narrative that has been floating around that it's going to be poor little taxpayers bailing out the fatcats yet again.

It does not.

Here the taxpayers are not directly bailing out anybody. But they are backstopping it, and have increased the risk they will have to to directly pay in the future. And they are indirectly doing so, because anybody with a bank account, which is basically everybody, is going to be paying more for loans or getting less in interest. If you'd like to hear an actual banker explain that, last night's Marketplace had a segment talking with a regional bank CEO where she talks about why she's not happy with having to pay for somebody else's losses.
Surely that's only the case until you add an objective?
thanks for the thoughts, Just did a thread unroll for the tweet: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1635687064036585472.html
LLMs are much better at answering math when told to take the character of a drunk mathematician
Their "articles" largely seem to be SEO/content farm pieces without any meaningful content.

For example, their article on SOCKS vs. HTTP proxies vs. VPNs is factually nonsensical (by e.g. describing HTTP proxies as "always unencrypted", or SOCKS as having higher performance due to "not rewriting packet headers"): https://nordvpn.com/blog/socks5-proxy/
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6825453-chatgpt-release-...
That says that GPT-4 is only for paid subscribers right now.
I wonder what the point of school is even going to be at this point
SVB was almost named "National InterCity Bancorp"
The US is the worst polluter in the world on a per-capita basis, and leads Africa by quite some margin.
I've dealt with code like that, and often wrote it. It's incredibly hard to get right IMO. It's an intuition that you develop over years of trial and error, not an exact science or set of rules.
Commented just prior: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35155529

The responses are interesting.
LOL it's the next headline down!

Things are moving very fast
Russia can't afford to give it's airforce ample practice time in the jets, so they are really not well trained. Several aircraft have been captured on film crashing during takeoff, from either lacking maintenance or pilot error.

That being said: This stunt is not good evidence of anything good or bad. Intercepting air assets is normal procedure, and things likely get harder when the actual aircraft itself has no fear for its own life, so the pilot of the unmanned vehicle might be a little more bold at testing limits, and the same for the Russian pilot.
It does, but you have to associate these cost as part of the employee expense and not a separate budget line item. An extra $100 / month for tools needed by somebody being paid $5,000+ / month is nothing.
It's an easter egg. Link:

https://try.scroll.pub/#scroll%0A%20comment%20This%20is%20wr...
Me: Does Bing use OpenAI's GPT-4?

BingChat: Hello, this is Bing. I’m sorry but I cannot answer that question as it is confidential. I can help you with other queries though.
GitHub Pi
Don't worry, now there will be an extra layer of indirection.
Yeah, I didn't think so. :) I know of no single incident of SHA-256 or SHA-3 having collisions successfully generated.

Cracking SHA-256 with rainbow tables is a fundamentally different exercise as you are relying on someone having selected a weak password that you can then generate a hash for. The weakness is not in SHA-256, but in the weak user selected password.
The claim is that long covid happens in 4% of infections.

The article links to a study as proof of this. The study is based on "self-reported long COVID" data.

So, once again, zero scientific evidence for long covid, only that people reported that they thought they had long covid.
Something similar that I've been using for a while now for an S3 filesystem: Cyberduck[0]

[0] https://cyberduck.io/s3/
People even misremember basic things like who they voted for in the past. Unfortunately I cannot find the study know.
After teaching customers for years that S3 shouldn't be mounted as a filesystem because of its whole object-or-nothing semantics, and even offering a paid solution named "storage gateway" to prevent issues between FS and S3 semantics, it's rather interesting they'd release a product like this.

Amazon should really just fix the underlying issue of semantics by providing a PatchObjectPart API call that overwrites a particular multipart upload chunk with a new chunk uploaded from the client. CopyObjectPart+CompleteMultipartUpload still requires the client to issue CopyObjectPart calls for the entire object.
> But let's be realistic here.

Let's. If I were to rent an instance for short bursts of time, I would be paying many multiples over a constant use instance. If I were to guarantee usage for x years, where the larger the X, the greater the discount. So already the delta between sporadic usage, X years use is large. There is evidence for this price discrepancy within all the cloud providers so this is not speculation. The the price difference is massive.

If you want to save even more cost, you could rent out VPSes or baremetal. They are insanely cheap, and compared to an AWS on demand instance the difference is night and day. Try comparing Hetzner with AWS. Hetzner, as far as I can tell, is not trying to entrench me into their system by offering extremely low prices. Nor are they a charity. I might even say they are an "open" hosting provider. To me it feels like they are passing along most of their savings and taking a small cut.

This is what it feels like to me what openAI is doing. I don't think their prices are so low its unprofitable. But because of their immense scale, its so much cheaper than me running an instance. I don't have to jump into conspiracy land to come up with a reasoning.
Flying a manned aircraft into a collision with an unmanned aircraft is pilot incompetence.

Ordering a human pilot to fly into a collision with an unmanned aircraft is command incompetence.

The attempts here to backsplain this ridiculousness is maddening. Why is a plot-twisting-conspiracy easier to accept than the far more likely explanation that an undertrained russian pilot decided to risk his plane and his life to fuck around and buzz the unmanned drone he ran across?
The future: You don't compress the movie frames, you supply a script and a list of actors and scenery and garb descriptions.
> Do you vet what ChatGPT tells you with other sources?

I find that ChatGPT is good at helping me with "unknown unknown" questions, where I don't know how to properly phrase my question for a search engine, so I explain to ChatGPT in vague terms how I am feeling about a certain thing.

ChatGPT helps me understand what to search for, and then I take it from there by looking for a reputable answer on a search engine.
Couldn't tell from the README, does this do any sort of cache management or LRU type thing? In other words, does it fetch the underlying S3 object in real time, and then eventually eject them from memory and/or the backing FS when they haven't been used for a while?
You are imagining that overnight we'll just use chatgpt to answer if a loan should be granted to a customer, and of course it can't do that reliably. But think turning that decision into steps that we can chip away at the problem. E.g.:

Step 1 will be to use chat gpt to get all of the loan inputs from documents, step 2 could be to identify any information that is missing that we should use to make the decision, step 3 will be making the decision. At each step well checks/balances and have human feedback. But don't kid yourself this is coming and the benefit for those that make the shift first are huge.
That doesn't make sense to me. Would rather you have it in the hands of people who think a lot about safety, but might be compelled to give it to bad actors, or would you rather just give it to bad actors right away?

It's not a zero-sum game where you can level the playing field and say everything's good.
If you have assistant disabled, holding down volume-up and volume-down buttons together on the lockscreen should have the same effect
So, the COST PER REQUEST will be (if you use the 32k context window and get 1k token response): 32*0.06 (prompt+context) + 0.12 (response) = US$ 2.04
I wonder if this kind of intelligent tutoring could be the answer to Bloom's Two Sigma Problem. The limiting factor with that problem was that not everyone can afford a personal tutor. Having an AI tutor that can breeze through the SAT seems like it should give every student a major boost.
How is it different than humans preparing for LSAT by studying sample questions and reading explanations?
Futurama's suicide booths may turn out to be most cost effective.
It probably doesn't need to be said, but it's pretty obvious the bias in that definition.

There is no singular definition of capitalism, but many others would differ on the distinction you've drawn from earlier posts. E.g., a system based on the reinvestment of excess profits does not necessarily equate to crony-capitalism. It seems your issue is with the person using the word "socialism" to describe a social ill of crony capitalism. But there is a distinction there that is being muddled in the conversation.
It would be interesting to see some example questions and answers. Since the test is multiple choice is it possible that the model has gotten very good at estimating how likely a possible answer is?
The possibility doesn't seem to have been brought up here, but I wouldn't take it as given that Flanker made it home.
>with clawback support

Does this exist? What would it look like? Can you force a wallet to release an NFT? Or is it just governmental - centralized! - approved reminting of an NFT?

Also your security model is "I hope users use a hardware wallet" - not a great track record of this! Even among professional cryptocurrency developers!

>Because a FOSS property deed database could be censored and cannot be independently verified outside of the governing body easily. I would expect the uptime to be slower. It would also become a central point of failure for all property deeds
This is the state of play today and it's... fine? Like I know many, many, many people buying houses and the hard part is not the record keeping of the deeds. That wouldn't even make a top 10 problem. And I know several people who've remortgaged or taken out credit against their house. They managed! Generally, taking out a big loan doesn't need to be fast - you don't do it that often.

Not exactly crying out for this solution, is it?

So, in summary, this use case isn't a high priority for nearly anyone (HELOCs already exist and can be accessed, and in any case, who needs them to be much faster? how often do they take out credit against their house?) and requires either centralized authority OR a future improvement to a blockchain (clawback!) and still requires the courts to looks at analog paper deeds (otherwise, how could seek resolution through the courts) in any case.
When running them costs too much energy?
I would like to divert your attention to this recent post: https://openai.com/research/gpt-4 specifically on the topic of "Steerability: Socratic tutor" (Sample 1 of 3)
Economics is an imperfect science but the equation of exchange suggests printing money could just change the nominal value of debts/goods and redistribute them rather than the total real value of debt/goods. That is you needn't create new real debt when printing money, you could just say be reducing the real value debt owed to current currency holders and distributing it to the backstopped depositors.

I'm not saying we should be going to a commodity money, but if we were using a physical commodity as money (as in the commodity is physically in the coin, not notes representing the commodity) that were hard to mine more of, I'm not sure this kind of redistribution would be so practical.
We're approaching the beggining of the end of the human epoch. Certainly Capitalism won't work or I dont see how it could work under full automation. My view is an economic system is a tool. If an economic system does not allow for utopian outcomes with emerging technology, then it's no longer suitable. It's clear that capitalism was born out of technological and societal changes. Now it seems it's come its time to end.
But how much of what it said was nonsense? And did you spot the nonsense or accept it?
> they're talking about what happened in 2008, not in 2023

Yes. The AAA-rates tranches which traded pennies on the dollar in ‘08 largely paid out as expected. That didn’t help banks trying to rely on them as their capital. But it noisily validated the ratings quality of those tranches. (Noisily because, again, massive government intervention.)
AI alignment people are dedicated to fending off the gigantic PR disasters like Tay (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(bot)) in order to keep their funding.

Whether either is capable of "bringing AGI to life" remains to be seen, but seems very doubtful.
Your response completely ignores the concerns raised in the comment you are replying to. "It saves your doctor 40% of their time" is not a reasonable response to "I don't want my private medical details divulged to a third party".
> I mean if you are gonna be a dick, you can shove people out of the elevator anyway. No need for a button.

Seems like the same principle behind online trolling or road rage: putting a layer of tech and/or anonymity between the person and their victim makes it easier for people to be cruel to each other.
does it look at credit card numbers?