skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> If the solution is logical but unlikely

The likeliness of the solution depends on context. If context is, say, a textbook on logical puzzles, then the probability of the logical solution is high.

If an LLM fails to reflect it, then it isn't good enough at predicting the text.

Yes, it could be possible that the required size of the model and training data to make it solve such puzzles consistently is impractical (or outright unachievable in principle). But the model being "just a text predictor" has nothing to do with that impossibility.
It’s highly species dependent, even among mammals. Some have a true low oxygen drive and not a high co2 drive. Mainly borrowing animals
Whoa shit, they’re still down? Last I saw all services were down, that still the case?
> There is another project inspired by scrcpy (I think) called sndcpy but it's no longer maintained it seems, so I'm very glad to see these capabilities added to scrcpy.

From the blog post:

> With the introduction of a new API to capture audio from an Android app in Android 10, I made a prototype called sndcpy. …

Not only was it work by the same author, it was one of _multiple_ pushes to make this work. Nice!
> I have a sister of a similar age to me who doesn't have children. My 7 year-old asked me recently - and this is a direct quote - "what is she for?"

I once asked my niece, a bit after she started really communicating, if she remembered what it was like to not be able to talk. She thought for a moment and then said, "Before I was squishy so I couldn't talk, but then I got harder so I can talk now." Can't argue with that logic.
I can tell because when I tried to figure out the cost of the existing Super Duolingo, I was unable to do so. The https://www.duolingo.com/super page gives me lots of information about tiers and benefits but never mentions a cost. I'm sure telling you hurt metrics. Fuck those guys.
Those are two different technologies. Amqp is all about routing and queues. Kafka is a distributed log, it is not a queue. There’s a significant difference between those two.

Kafka: every consumer for a partition within a consumer group will see a message at least once. A queue: it’s possible that a partition has multiple consumers and only one consumer sees a particular message.

Kafka is relatively small to medium number of large volume topics. Topics can be larger the a machine due to partitioning. Strict ordering per partition based on message arrival time. Queues (RabbitMQ or anything amqp) are relatively large number or small to medium volume topics. Ordering is an option, a topic must fit within a machine.

Thos are orthogonal concepts. They can live next to each other. My first choice is always Kafka because: persistence, replication, scalability. Works fine as a single broker, can always scale horizontally, zookeeper is not that scary, especially with a good operator.

If you think that Kafka is difficult to run, wait until you need replication in RabbitMQ. Good luck with leader election in your application layer. No fun.
Nah, they go too far in hating it beyond the bounds of actual reality. I hate cryptocurrency as much as the next guy, but I got banned from that sub for pointing out that credit card transactions don't actually settle instantly and chargebacks exist.
I'd recommend https://create.t3.gg/, it bundles trpc, prisma, nextjs, etc...
SEEKING WORK | REMOTE (EU timezone)

I'm available for part-time contracts or short consulting gigs in addition to my main assignment.
My main assignment ends this summer, also open to discuss longer full-time engagements after that.

Skills:

- 15 years of experience in companies ranging from 5-person startups to huge multinationals, MSc in AI

- Deep experience with Kafka, streaming processing and adjacent tech:
designing messaging based architectures, fixing bottlenecks.

- Rule modeling and discrete optimization with Optaplanner, Google OR-tools & MiniZinc.

- Building prototype apps for visualization and decision support with ClojureScript.

See profile for contact details.
No. They are not open source or a non profit. Why should I give them my money (time/knowledge) for free?
But imagine if there would be multiple topics, instead of a single bucket, that - beside some tech news and releases - defaults to the same old discussions.
Video doesn't have a link to product. Here it is: https://xrai.glass/
This is not so clear-cut, though. There is a lot of gray area and doubt about this. HIPAA is not as complete protection as people think, and there are many situations where you'd think HIPAA would obviously apply, but it doesn't.
Can someone ELI5 what exactly is immutable in an OS?

Are all applications run as sandboxed containers or something?

If so, do they natively support switching between multiple versions of, say python?

In-line Edit: if they do, awesome, how about drivers and say CUDA?

More importantly, does it break the usual install scripts of packages and require special handling OR do things just work?
Either that or Mars, the god of war, who gives the name.
That looks like a very cool idea. Basically one code base, all browser client code, except for the (apparently directly linked) telefunc files that are caught by some build step and turned into something that runs on the server.

Have you used it on a larger project?
If you think thats high, second avenue subway extension in nyc is looking to spend 6 billion to extend 1.5 miles.
And if you go look at /r/wallstreetsilver you'll see those same assholes are shitting all over the hand that fed them.
I wonder if they ran an a prior power analysis to see if the effect size they were looking for even had a good chance of being discovered.
Signature Bank blows up, US crypto frantically looks for new banking
That is a feature, not a bug. It's an efficient way to brainwash a population.
Could openai just run google queries and display them minus the ads?

Then google could find themselves in deep trouble rather soon than late, I wager.
That migration happened only because of a confluence of a few events. There was the redesign which was badly received and the whole DECSS kerfuffle.

but the biggest problem is, as I see it, there isn't anywhere new to go, really.

Reddit was a great upgrade from what digg was offering, threaded comments and subreddits and much more democratic moderation.

What's the alternative to reddit, what does it offer?
Maybe metaverse is the answer to climate change? If managers could stand behind workers' backs in virtual 3D, peek over their shoulders and give valuable motivational feedback, maybe they would be more open to remote work, thus saving all that commute.
I think their comment is ironic, since today's downtime has been longer than any Twitter outage since the musk drama. And I guess I agree that it's pretty funny that redditors are usually the most vocal about the imminent collapse of Twitter's infra (in 2 more weeks)since it's now a complete dumpster fire of a platform or something.
And we know chatgpt answers better when you say "are you sure" or "imagine you are great Mathematician". A bit similar
I starting joking about that like 2 weeks ago and I hope I did not start a self-fulfilling rumor because I would feel very ashamed
Thousands of Buildings Collapsed in One Turkish City
While AI gets better and better at creating what I would call "creative output", e.g. poems, texts of any form really, imagery and videos, I think the human skill it takes to produce these becomes less valuable.

In the future I imagine you'd no longer have to be good at writing poems, you'd just have to be good at distinguishing a "bad" poem from a good one. "Bad" is obviously highly subjective in this context.

So it becomes more and more important to have what I would call "good" taste, not the skills to do creative work yourself.
> Welcome back!

You are already logged in and will be redirected back to Reddit shortly.

Then..

> Something went wrong. Just don't panic.

Don't worry Reddit! I am OK. I hope you.. don't panic :)
> In order to resolve this, ChatGPT's training corpus needs to contain a "correct answer" next to every unique permutation of every question.

This is not quite the right understanding of how ChatGPT works. It's not necessary to show ChatGPT an example of every possible permutation of an animal crossing puzzle in order for it to solve one it has never seen before. That's because the neural network is not a database of recorded word probabilities. It can instead represent the underlying logic of the puzzle, the relationships between different animals and using this abstract, pared down information, extrapolate the correct answer to the puzzle.

I see the failure in the example with the goat the lion and the cabbage as simply a matter of overfitting.

Edit: I see a lot of people saying "it doesn't understand logic; it's just predicting the next word."

I'm basing my understanding on this video:

https://youtu.be/viJt_DXTfwA

The claim is that it would be impossible to feed enough input into a system such that it could produce anything as useful as ChatGPT unless it was able to abstract the underlying logic from the information provided. If you consider the he number of permutations of the animal crossing puzzle this quickly becomes clear. In fact it would be impossible for ChatGPT to produce anything brand new without this capability.
Forget MQTT, Redis as a PUB/SUB will do 99% of the job most of the time.
> Korzybski: The map isn't the territory.

> This article: The map isn't the experienced territory isn't the territory.

This seems over-thought and tautological. It just reinforces to me that Korzybski was wise. The article was also needlessly meandering for my tastes, but I guess some people like "making their way down the trail" of a blogpost.
People will fight over resources. Some will lose. As the ancients said, vae victus.
With mqtt it depends on the broker, eg. Emitter.io can save them for a week etc.
Offset for a client is usually stored on the broker, so if a client reconnects, all of the messages it has missed are forwarded to it.

As mentioned in other answers, service levels have a defined meaning, which is different to the absolute theoretical meaning, and really is to do with the message aks.

Really, as the article mentions, kafka and mqtt are for different purposes, with some overlap. Kafka is all about the log, whereas mqtt is about uncertain connections. A better comparison which I've yet to see, is comparing mqtt to nats.

Lastly, kafka is much easier to administer using redpanda, which doesn't have zookeeper, combines the registry and kafka connect (see WASM runners) with the runtime, and has a very nice console for debugging.

Similarly, Emitter.io does a great job with clustering for mqtt.

I'd like to see an open source kafka-mqtt bridge that worked in both directions as they all seem to go mqtt->kafka only.
I had a steel splinter in my thumb once. It turned gray, and then just faded, over a span of 6 months or so. I was disappointed, because I could use it to feel magnetic fields, which was really neat.
It's a LLM, not sentient. It doesn't know what "cannot" and "will not" means or implies. You're trying to interpret its output as you would a thinking person's.

I'd put it this way: when GPT refuses to answer, it just observes a topical no-go zone and uses the phrase it deems most likely to strongly convey refusal, as that's the phrase that was used most often/most successfully in its training data.
> For example I couldn't tell the text at all in any of the four tags, including the "hard to read" or "quite unreadable".

For what it's worth, I couldn't tell the difference either. All of them were completely incomprehensible.
> Moral consistency on animal welfare is really hard because we have so many blind spots due to how commonplace some practices are.

That really depends on what kind of value system you're starting with.
That Caltrans budget is for maintaining a huge network of roads/highways across the entire state, as well as paying for various public transit programs and the highway patrol.
The last time I visited a doctor, he had an assistant with him that took all the notes.
EPA moves to limit toxic 'forever chemicals' in drinking water
For clarification, $0.002 is the ChatGPT API price, not the text-davinci-003 price ($0.02).
It can do some thinking. You can give it instructions to modify a piece of code that definitely isn't on the internet with several steps and it attempts to follow instructions, which, for a human, requires formulating what steps to take.

The prompts have to read like good written requirements for something, so they have some degree of specificity.

But the fact that it can follow instructions and carry them out almost certainly could be considered some form of thinking, especially on novel text not on the internet.
Moxie Marlinspike (legendary cryptographer, security researcher and creator of the Signal protocol which powers Signal and WhatsApp) wrote an apt article on privacy 10 years ago, and I highly recommend it.

https://moxie.org/2013/06/12/we-should-all-have-something-to...
Vodka ?
Inflation still a front-burner issue in the hectic Fed kitchen
‘Dragon’ Drone Articulates Itself Mid-Air with Perfect Stability
It doesn't matter. This is the real world, not the imaginary world where dogs can speak.

You have to accept that in the real world a dog's life is objectively worth less to humans than a human life.

If that were not true, then it would be generally accepted that saving a dog would take priority over a child, whereas the reverse is true.

I'm not advocating for mistreating dogs, I'm advocating for distinguishing between how we would like the world to be and how the world really is.
C16 Biosciences CEO Shara Ticku wants to replace palm oil with “Palmless”
The thing I hate most about reddit are all the little bubbles that are created by bad moderation. Sometimes, this is even automated. You can only post on certain threads if you have the right skin color (r/BlackPeopleTwitter), or ideological disposition (r/conservative) or net worth (r/fatFire).

The absolute worst are when some mod shadow bans you (all posts / comments are silently removed), and refuses to tell you why. I had that happen on my city subreddit, I guess because I said we needed a larger police presence to get property crime under control. That was the only remotely controversial thing I've ever said there.
> people are getting banned now.

Getting banned from what? Bing, or their whole Microsoft account?
MQTT isn’t designed as a persistent log, but can fulfil some of what you might want to use one for.

Each message has a couple of flags, the first being Quality of Service, which as you quoted above determines deliver guarantees. 0 is fire and forget, with potential loss of messages. 1 will queue messages for delivery to offline clients that are subscribed to a topic (within reason, all brokers set limits on that), and 2 is often described as “exactly once”, but is in fact just a more involved dance to acknowledge messages.

The other flag is a Retain flag, which instructs the broker to associate that message with the topic it was sent to, and send it on to any newly subscribing clients when they subscribe. This is good for use cases like remote device configuration - you can send it to a topic, setting the retain flag, and then when a device comes online it’ll immediately receive new configuration.

MQTT is great as a message queue for remote devices, mostly because it’s so lightweight anything with an IP stack can integrate with it, but I’m not sure why anyone would attempt to make it a piece of core infrastructure.
While what you said rings true, one thing you are forgetting is that demand for people who work in tech is only going up. This is worldwide.
Can you share what field you’re talking about?
To find out anyone's posts count just tap on their name and then the 'comments' link - here you go:

https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=RjQoLCOSwiIKfpm

https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=RjQoLCOSwiIKfpm

You asked why you were limited, I wanted to provide some opinion as you didn't seem to be aware of any reason that you might be.
I'm personally finding GPT to be exceptionally fun to work with, like the most fun I've had programming in a long time. It brings back some of the magic of programming when I was a kid, and then some.

It also makes me feel anxious about where this is all going. I'm having questions about whatever I thought was unique about me, or about humans over computers. And like all of us I have a lot of identity and sense of self-worth tied up in my relationship with computers. All of that feels mixed up and confused now. My confidence in how the future will unfold is very low. (I'm also unemployed, which in some ways feels auspicious at this moment, but also creates a high base-level anxiety.)

So far I feel like GPT rewards expertise. That is, your confidence and both breadth and depth of knowledge are accentuated by GPT, not diminished. But will that stay true? Things I think I understand keep changing every couple months. And what will these changes mean to us collectively? I really don't know, and that's uncomfortable.
And that is any different from the school books we currently use how?
Yeah, I'm just reading the pdf and it's a bit suprising to me. I thought I missed something. They went from Open to "Model Closed, Tech Open" to "Everything Closed" this fast...? We're witnessing how much you can buy with Microsoft-level money.
A request for a source should include an argument for why a bit of information needs a source (what facts are in question, and how they impact the broader argument). A lazy “sources please!” should be treated as bad faith attempt to DDOS the other participant.
midori. it was mostly modems. haven't heard about the security cameras yet.
Right, anthropomorphization is the biggest source of confusion here. An LLM gives you a perfect answer to a complex question and you think wow, it really "understood" my question.

But no! It doesn't understand, it doesn't reason, these are concepts wholly absent from its fundamental design. It can do really cool things despite the fact that it's essentially just a text generator. But there's a ceiling to what can be accomplished with that approach.
Sadly no. They banned specific threads / subreddits, not the content.
Its unable to solve it.
The morons are the ones who click on adverts, and so long as clicking on adverts is the goal, they will always win.

That's why there are no social networks. They are moron menageries. Idiot aggregators. Stupidity sieves.
The result is hilariously wrong in all sorts of way: it doesn't understand what "vegan" means, it gives the wrong descriptions, and it carries stuff from the shore where it wasn't.

Here's what ChatGPT told me (I used "wolf" instead of "lion"):

"This is a similar problem to the classic river crossing puzzle, but with a few different elements to consider. Here's one possible procedure to solve this riddle:

1. The man takes the cabbage across the river and leaves it on the other side.

2. The man goes back alone and takes the wolf across the river, leaving it with the cabbage on the other side. It's important to note that the wolf is a vegan and will not eat the cabbage.

3. The man goes back alone and takes the goat across the river, leaving it on the other side.

4. The man goes back to the original side and picks up the cabbage, bringing it across the river to join the others.

5. Finally, the man goes back to the original side and picks up the wolf, bringing it across the river to join the others.

In this way, all of the man's belongings have been safely transported to the other side of the river, without the wolf eating the goat or the cabbage being destroyed."
Embedding Functional Logic Programming in Haskell via a Compiler Plugin
CHP has its own separate $3b budget, and DMV is also separate and it gets $1.4b. https://ebudget.ca.gov/budget/2023-24/#/Agency/2500
When will the longer context length be available through ChatGPT Plus? Have they said yet?
Bing chat.

But who knows how those kinds of things stack up. Do three service bans lead to an account ban etc?
Switzerland's wealth is tied to the reputation of their banks being top tier.

Swiss bankers already lost a lot of customers to US banks, letting CS fail would have very bad consequence on Swiss economy long term
They said - there is no evidence. The reply hence is not supposed to be - how do you know that.
The proposition begs for a counter example, in this case an evidence.
Simply saying - love is non algorithmic - is not evidence, it is just another proposition that has not been proven, so it brings us no closer to an answer i am afraid.
I feed Reddit is a point where a drop in the user base will improve the content making it better, which will make it more popular.
Evolution is a process that works without an intelligent steward. In a way it's a brute force technique. Plus, nothing is optimizing for intelligence in evolution, it is merely a happy accident that humans ended up with the brains that we did. A different environment could yield drastically different evolutionary history

It doesn't seem very logical to think that because evolution took so long to get us to where we are now, we consequently won't be able to design an intelligent AGI system.
> before we had to power it down to move it.

Reminds me of a story where someone had to move a server physically without downtime. The story is on Reddit, but if you really want to read it now there's an archived version. And there's a Hacker News thread too.

https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/i3xbjb/rant_sorta...

https://web.archive.org/web/20221224195636/https://www.reddi...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24059243
"The network just cannot deal with peak loads"

It can if it gets upgraded. Which is happening.

"Solar and wind are pretty useless at night or when there’s no wind"

Did you forget about the batteries already? And are you forgetting that power grids operate on a continental level? Your power doesn't have to come from next door.
It can't even do simple sysadmin tasks like fixing a broken installation, or fixing simple configure/make/make install issues.
78,000 stars, 2096 commits, of which Romain has 87%, and he only has one GitHub sponsor:

https://github.com/sponsors/rom1v

and two LiberaPay sponsors:

https://liberapay.com/rom1v

who donate a combined 3 euro per month. If you can afford it, please send this guy some money, he has earned it many times over.
Does it give the right information or just some that sounds reasonable to you?
GenerateRandomBit() either returns true or false depending on the seed (which gets updated with each call). If it returns true on the first iteration then dataPointer[0] will be OR'd with 1 (i.e. set to "1"), otherwise it will be left as 0. For the next iteration, dataPointer[0] is conditionally OR'd with 2 etc. (until iteration 32, where it starts updating dataPointer[1]).
Reddit captures so much of what (to me) made the old internet so fantastic.

Anything I want to learn more about I can search for and find detailed descriptions/reviews/stories from real people talking about their real products with no advertising cluttering up my experience. It's a delight.

Disclaimer: I exclusively use Apollo, which is why I never see any ads.
Or rather people are clueless or oblivious to what they are actually doing online.

If I put up a stall in the street with a large "Bank" noticeboard no-one would give me wads of cash. Yet online that's exactly what people do.

>so the risk is almost zero

This article, and countless other crypto stories, demonstrate that the risk is not zero. It's just that it may takes some time to manifest itself.
haha, brains are truly amazing, both in their resiliency and in their vulnerability. you got me.
So now we can easily conclude that including a Bing search in the context makes GPT-4 worse.
blocking is even better because everyone else can read it too, so it just looks like the blocked person had no response to the comment and accepted “defeat”