skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> as it stores and establishes cryptographic proof of ownership.

But if the entity that is charged with keeping track of who owns what needs to keep a central database anyway, what value does keeping the ownership records elsewhere bring? I see doing that as accomplishing nothing but increasing the number of things that can go wrong.

When it comes to things like real estate, the "proof of ownership" is completely without meaning unless you also have the extra data beyond that. Things like where the land is, what the boundaries of the property are, etc.
Let us know, swatcoder!
You can critique the US, their history, their actions all you like none of that is of any relevance to the present conflict we are discussing. Its chaff you use to hide the fact that your core argument is so bad.

Nothing but mindless aggression and acquisitiveness has provoked this war. There is only one side that has unilaterally begun this conflict and there is only one party that can end it by going home. That is the only thing to talk about–when Russia is going home—and nothing whatsoever to say on it.

Appeasement can't possibly work because a rational actor would then conclude that they can buy back their former empire with blood and negotiate their way out of the very temporary pain of sanctions. It would inevitably lead to war, death, and pain. For someone who proposes it seems to be a student of history, you are uniquely bad at following a simple line of logic or staying on track.
https://archive.ph/q2GRY
I didn't say "nonsense." I said "(partial) nonsense." If we use our powers of logical deduction, it therefore follows that I wasn't claiming that everything you said was nonsense. Hence the reason I added nuance to my comment, unlike yours. I'm trying to tease apart the convoluted mess you're making. You're aware of Brandolini's law, right? This is a microcosm of that. Some of what you're saying is bullshit, but not quite all of it, and aspects of it are rooted in truth and reasonable experiences. (For example, I also do not "depend on all sorts of crates for the simplest things.")

My tactic is to present nuance. You come back to me and instead of actually engaging with the nuance, starting whinging about what's being "sold on HN." Yawn.

> It is tedious to shuffle around results, but this is never part of the sales pitch.

This is a good example. Your sentence starts with something that I wouldn't agree with as a general rule, but I could certainly see it being true in specific circumstances. And even then, I'd want to explore those circumstances. That is, is it really a property of `Result` that makes it tedious, or is the problem of error handling in that context itself? It could be either.

But then you follow it up with whinging about "sales pitch." Are you talking about some kind of sales pitch put out by the Rust project? Because if so, please link it to me. Or are you talking about a bunch of random HN commentators that can be overzealous about just literally anything? I don't see anyone saying Result is the best thing since sliced bread. What I do see are people describing positive experiences with it, especially in relationship to alternative error handling paradigms. Is that really a sales pitch?

I mean, look at my top-level comment in this entire post. I sang the praise of sum types, and I did it by echoing what the OP said. Is that a sales pitch? Am I saying that sum types are the "best" at something? Am I saying that they have literally no costs at all? Am I saying that useful programs can't be written without sum types? Am I saying that all languages should be designed to include sum types?

No. No. No. No and no. Did some other people go a touch too bar and make broad pronouncements about "correct" language design? Oh yeah, absolutely. Are those people some kind of singular phenomenon unique to Rust? Fuck no. And it is absolutely fucking baffling that I need to explain that to someone who has been on HN for as long as you have. This observation is so banal that it's blub.
By default Podman doesn't have a daemon running as root, although you can opt into it. Podman instead really encourages setting up systemd units to keep your images running.
Oh boy, the ethics problems do manifest in the real world much more than alignment problems. If only for the simple reason that ethics problems can and do arise in the use of very simple models (logistic regression) and are not preconditioned on achieving AGI or anything close.

For example a logistic regression model for fraud detection that bases it's decision mostly on zip codes. Is actually a proxy for deciding based on race (in the US at least)

These kind of models are already massively used and commercially sold not as some curiosities but as decision makers that impact the day to day life's of millions if not billions of ppl.
This just reminds me of Windows 11. The Home edition which most people would buy cannot bypass the setup screen without connecting to the internet and creating a Microsoft account. Can't believe Apple is the more free option here.
From the consumer side, it’s difficult to find meaningful specs. I can’t find a webcam that explicitly states that it has AV1 support, not even Logitech.
Don't forget all the youtubers a VPN has to pay and all the 75% off deals with the promocode ILOVEMYYOUTUBER.
I think if you integrated with Llama, this repo would be wildly popular. I downloaded the weights over the weekend and decided I didn't want to spend my free time working on an acceptable UI.
Fathom analytics or Plausible analytics. I use Fathom.
quite a long and detailed FAQ here

https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/alaska/bycatch/frequent-quest...
DigitalOcean offers a single repository for free.

https://www.digitalocean.com/products/container-registry
It's 1-2 seconds for a 1 GB database with millions of items.

(A couple years ago this was more like minutes, and about 10 years ago it would have taken hours!)
AnyList does combine ingredients from multiple recipes, but the ingredient names and units have to match. For example, if one recipe calls for "2 onions" and another recipe calls for "3 onions", you'll see a single item in your shopping list for "5 onions". But if one recipe calls for "2 large onions" and another recipe calls for "1/2 cup yellow onion, chopped", then they won't be combined.

I'm not sure exactly what the grandparent comment means by "new ordering", but AnyList supports ordering for pickup or delivery from Walmart, Instacart, Kroger, Safeway, Albertsons, and other stores: https://help.anylist.com/articles/feature-overview-online-sh...

(Disclosure: I am the co-founder of AnyList.)
True. I thought the same for the other example, writing a job description. I thought "WTF" now job postings are going to be even more useless.
Does it mean that each free organization and its repositories will be removed or only their private repositories? This is not clear for me.
If this gets added to Google Docs and made free for public, English teachers are going to have a hard time knowing if their students wrote anything
The religious would say theirs proof everywhere. You just fundamentally have a different worldview so there’s no point in the debate.
It's just a general rant towards climate-change-apathetic people
Microsoft Points were a dark pattern to obscure the actual cost of games and to leave customers with partially-depleted point counts. They're not a good thing to look back at. Microsoft wisely stopped their use about a decade ago, and Xbox purchases are done in fiat currency instead.
> The NFT would be stored on chain and inside the NFT would be hash of the data that is stored off chain

Ok, but what's the benefit of doing that?
I don't work for Facebook/Meta... but get rid of the open floor plans, go back to real cubicles (the ones with the taller walls) and provide a decent cafeteria... I don't mind paying for my meals... and I would head back to the office.
Target now also has a world class incident response and forensics team setup after their big breach and being nearly every security vendors topic du jour for years. It's entirely reasonable they do this to add to malicious detection signal, or fraud.
https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/fall18/cos418/d...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastry_(DHT)

https://codethechange.stanford.edu/guides/guide_kademlia.htm...

https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/ton:chord/paper-ton.pdf
So the answer is no, got it.
They do have reasons to stay private though, you must give them that.
Customer of FRB. My banker was quick and responsive to some tech support I needed. Didn't seem panicked at all. Just my perspective, take it for what it is
Yup 40%, it's in the textbook, and as the other commenter nicely put it, it also seems like the financial equivalent of dark matter to me.

We are living in times of idiosyncratic risk and my approximations above are likely no better than hearsay.

That being said I'm not rushing to buy or sell $CS stock even with my elevated risk tolerance and the seemingly low price.
my opinion, worth what you paid for it:

you shouldn't worry about n+1 issues until you have a verified perf issue in your app

if you have paging and N is relatively small, the additional complexity may not be worth it (although ActiveRecord makes it very easy to tweak locally as needed, which is the right thing)

what is important in my opinion is a server side framework is logging of perf related details out of the box:

- show how long each request takes and flag slow ones
- show what queries occur in each request

The more humane formatting of these logs, the better...
Those buttons look like they're in some place other than the US (I think we have two types of buttons here, but I'm not enough of an elevator nerd to explain why). In Japan I've seen the double-click to undo pretty much everywhere. The door close buttons also work.

I could be wrong but I think the ADA was a little overzealous. 99% of the time there isn't someone with low mobility trying to walk over to the elevator. The 1% of the time someone is having trouble, I've never seen them pound the door close button; they hold their hand to block the light curtain until they get in. (When the elevator starts beeping and doing the slow-close thing, that's when I take my hand out. I've never seen anyone's hand get crushed in the elevator, but you can tell it wants blood.)
BTC and Monero were built to resist laws made by people with guns.

There were other attempts at digital currency before BTC, but they were all taken down by people with guns.

That's kinda the whole point. That's why BTC uses energy. It's a means of resistance to people with guns.
You don't need an ethics team to tell you about those risks, they are pretty obvious.

What you need is your legal team to tell you how risky it is, and management to decide how risk averse they want to be.
No one is claiming it is a tautology for all X and Y, it just happens to be true in this particular case.
The reason I took the example is because Iceland is a developed western country that most people have heard about that happened to match the number.

Sure, Iceland has a small population but their GDP per capita is almost 5x that of Romania.
If they're a neurologist and Googling "what does brain do", sure.

If they're searching up safety data on a slightly-over-recommended dose for a particular medication (like, say, a gastric bypass patient who takes an oral med that's not absorbed as much as in a person with a normal stomach), I'd much prefer they be certain than guess.
https://docs.leaningtech.com/cheerpj/
'Incident' Involving US-Made Drone over Black Sea: Military Sources
OTC derivates is selling derivates (not direct instruments like tokens or equities or real estate, but rather instruments whose value is derived from a combination of a base instrument and other features, like an expiration date or a target price) to regular people over the counter (OTC).

Derivatives are way more volatile than base instruments, and since crypto is already volatile as a base instrument, crypto derivates are VERY volatile.
How did Americans come to trust markets more than government?
>The same process would never cause the red card to conmpletely go away

The forward diffusion process completely destroy all information, in fact when the model is trained we simply sample directly from the gaussian distribution instead of actually applying the forward diffusion process on a sample, so the fact that you lose information in the diffusion process is not really a problem because with the diffusion process you lose all information but the model clearly can still generate images.
just demand that they use a slur, this is the true voight-kampff
A thing long overdue, I’d say!

Have you thought about making some ELI5 explainer on how the algo essentially works?

The post you link to is already a great start, I feel like it’s just a question of a little editing work and maybe more examples

— for the nerds to get interested and actually read the paper

— for the users to understand privacy properties better (eg why this is better than TLS in case of a server infected with malware, etc

— and also things which it doesn’t do, which would calm anxiety in those who /need/ to understand the limitations to feel safe

— and to keep devs from thinking it’s a magic pixie dust and over-promising users, only to get hacked
Literally Chat GPT
After evaluating several SQL and NoSQL services I ended up using Planetscale for my chrome extension Autotype[1]. I have a single db with tables to store user accounts, rich text shortcuts, role based access controls etc. I use Cloudflare workers and Planetscale's serverless library to interact with the db. The pricing is reasonable and the developer experience is great for an indie hacker like me.

[1] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/autotype-free-text...
Podman is very different internally than Docker.
It might mimic commands and OCI image standard, but other things are quite different.

Docker is daemon-based and and Podman is not. Podman uses SELinux by default with additional features and other practices for better security. You can use it without root user.
Hey, just wanted to say I appreciate you sharing this insight. I still miss Reader even though it's been 10 years (10 years, holy crap), but this at least explains the 'why'.
Cover it in a blizzard of words: that's a good tactic. Let's go over them:

> your line of attack here is just as baffling as someone countering "Joe's a solid clean-up hitter" with "yeah but look at this list of times he struck out!"

Yes, but "Joe" has OPS numbers (which are more meaningful than the outdated RBI number, incidentally). What are your big Planning home runs?

Your "specific and oft-cited cases" are vague and not specific, on the level of "hey, Japan and Germany!" While mine are actually specific disasters.

"which point is quite far from being controversial," -- I think you mean in Ivy League faculties and scholarly journals, not in actual business publications.
Size and mass are the other big factors.
This has been my experience as a data engineer.

ML guys build the fun stuff, go to conferences, etc. We maintain their stuff and work the 60 hour weeks answering pages.

It's mind numbing. Arguably some of the most boring work I've ever done especially knowing that you're just a CI/CD robot. Nothing has motivated me towards looking into starting a business more than watching other people have fun and you cleaning up their messes.
> Our early analysis of performance data suggests that engineers who either joined Meta in-person and then transferred to remote or remained in-person performed better on average than people who joined remotely. This analysis also shows that engineers earlier in their career perform better on average when they work in-person with teammates at least three days a week. This requires further study, but our hypothesis is that it is still easier to build trust in person and that those relationships help us work more effectively.

Realizing that this is an unpopular opinion, in person work is better for the business. Business decisions are being made around encouraging in person work, because relationships help at work.
It's not open source
Actual Copilot for Enterprise:

https://github.blog/2023-02-14-github-copilot-for-business-i...
Mechanical Design Tips and Tricks for Engineers Inventors and Serious Makers
But if the VPN provider really was routing other customers traffic through your internet… you’d know it. You’d see requests and traffic that you didn’t make going across your router. Since you’d be the endpoint for the other dudes VPN you could probably even see what IPs they are connecting to and get an idea about the nature of their requests.

I dunno if SSL encrypts the entire HTTP payload or not but could you even figure out the URL’s being requested using a tool like wireshark?
The psychological benefits of commuting that remote work doesn't provide
Interesting: chatgpt says the doi is 10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/044022 which I can’t find either. Idk what the likelihood of it being removed or moved is but I want to know if it’s real now. I emailed the journal. I’ll let you know if they reply.
Ah, the problem with reading text on the internet. Totally sounded like a criticism with the ellipses.
True. And, of course, now we have socialism for the rich (see SVB) and bootstrap-pulling for the poor (see Palestine, Ohio).
An essay by Yudkowsky about the pivot:

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/fLRPeXihRaiRo5dyX/the-magnit...
It's FHE applied to solve a variant of oblivious transfer, called "private information retrieval" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_information_retrieval). PIR is very similar to oblivious transfer, except that in oblivious transfer, the privacy is mutual - the client learns exactly one element from the database; in PIR, it's ok if the client learns some number of 'extra' items other than the one it queried.
Some of my favorite books around managing software projects and technical leadership:

* The Manager's Path - read the chapter on being a Tech Lead
* Making Work Visible
* Accelerate

My website has more book reviews on this topic: https://www.briansnotes.io/audience/tech-lead/
> You claimed it as a benefit! There's no reason that NFTs for property deeds would: Be standardised, or be on the same chain. That's more an application level concern, so please take that point back.

There's different standard levels right? I'm talking about when you build a property deed NFT you'd have to adhere to the on-chain standard for how NFTs are created on that particular blockchain. Then once those NFTs existed other people could integrate them. If you want the property deeds to have a set of standard specifications of how they deal with particular situations that might arise through inheritance, multiple parties, lost keys, etc. then that would be an application level specification.

> Also, still no one is asking for cryptographic proof of property ownership, even if you make it a single button push. No one needs it now, what does it add? Why is what we have now in need of cryptographic verification? Crypto boosters want it because they're selling it, directly or indirectly. You have not answered this question.

I'm asking for it and I'm sure others would like to have it to. :) Having cryptographic verification provides an ability to quickly prove ownership from an application and then that verification could unlock certain home owner benefits (e.g. HELOCs)
The Windows key has a lot of system level shortcuts already. As callalex mentioned, the Super key is usually for system level shortcuts while the Ctrl key is mostly for application inputs.

There's a lot of system level shortcuts. Many of which I use all the time.

Win opens the start menu and lets you start typing to search.

Win+Tab is the new task switcher UI. Useful for moving apps between desktops.

Win+L locks the computer, which I use almost every time I get up from my computer.

Win+M/Win+Shift+M minimizes/unminimizes all windows.

Win+Home minimizes all but the currently selected window, pressing it again resets it all.

Win+, shows the desktop until you release the Win key.

Win+E opens a new file explorer window

Win+{0,9} opens/switches to the application pinned to the taskbar at that position.

Win+Arrow Key maximizes or snaps windows to the top or sides

Win+Shift+Arrow moves windows between monitors

Win+R opens the Run dialog

Win+K opens the Connect tool which helps quickly connect to wireless displays, speakers, and headsets.

Win+Shift+S opens the snapshot tool.

Win+V opens clipboard history

Win+P changes presentation modes, useful for projectors

Win+. opens the emoji picker
I'm not sure aggressive marketing = sketchy, but it probably means that it's highly profitable.
In downtown Minneapolis, the whole of downtown is on computer controlled traffic light grid, so the crosswalk buttons don't change any of the timing of the traffic light grid.

But on all the ADA upgraded intersections, the crosswalk buttons DO start announcing the count down time, and what intersection they are at.

So, they do something, but they won't change the time it takes the light to actually change.
Actions like forking?
> You don't want to be heads down and miss a big trend or a new tool that will save you tons of time.

Meh. A lot of these trends, like ChatGPT or Copilot, don't really save me time.
But that's not a new point?! The second, expensive step (RLHF) was already automated by Anthropic with their Constitutional AI approach several months ago.
https://css.csail.mit.edu/6.824/2014/notes/dht/dht.pdf
Thanks for the input. This paragraph is indeed a selling point of Cheerp. "if you build with -flto to enable LTO" is only true if you run on Linux since LLVM LTO support on Windows and Mac is limited.
Yes, unfortunately, the more advanced products are much more restricted.
Yeah, I've noticed that. Actual videos on the site come up for relevant queries, as for pages on the YouTube site when you search for them (like YouTube Help). But just 'YouTube' on its own doesn't seem to bring up the home page, or just about anything from the domain.
You don't think adding

> We might have different opinions on what counts as "innovative" I guess.

might have made it seem like you were doing more than "simply listing" what you found?

We might have differing opinions on what constitutes a personal attack, I guess.
> That would be my intuition too, in particular that usually the cost of idle workers is pretty low, so it's better just to preallocate some fixed max number of workers than try to scale them.

I wouldn't necessarily intuit the cost of idle workers is low, more that the non-cpu cost of workers is roughly fixed, and if it's too expensive to run more than you need at idle, it's still going to be too expensive to run that many at full load. Sometimes it's hard to know what the max load capacity is, but Apache configs where the worker count scales in and out are really easy to get into load is high -> spawn more workers -> use too much memory -> pick your poison: evict too much disk cache / swap to death / oom killer
The fact my company turns down over 80 applications a week and only 1/5 of the accepted applicants make it through the first interview tells me you're wrong. It's only an easy meal ticket if you're deluded. Highly motivated, hungry, individuals are not the usual candidate. The usual candidate is a code school graduate who got tricked by an influencer into spending 18k for a moonshot.
Crazy that this stuff is moving at lightning speed
I mean, it works just fine; you can watch all Netflix-owned content on NordVPN. You just can't watch any of the stuff they license for local distribution.
What kind of Chief Security Officer doesn't have a team? I would expect them to have a team that does things like security scans, pentesting, auditing, researching CVEs to find ones that might affect the company, etc.