skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well, effort for such undertaking has started by yours truly as a Caddy module/plugin. Here's my announcement blog post: https://www.caffeinatedwonders.com/2022/03/28/new-ssh-server....

It's not abandoned. I'm still trying to move the project forward. I've just been busy with life. I've moved the repo to an org and put a new name on it: https://github.com/kadeessh/kadeessh. Contributions and help are more than welcome. I'd love to evolve the project, but I need hands and feedback from users, which I haven't received much of.
A really good book is Style: Toward Clarity and Grace by Joseph M. Williams (https://www.amazon.com/Style-Clarity-Joseph-M-Williams/dp/02...), notable because it uses a lot of examples to move step by step through the process of improving and clarifying what you've written. Far too often people think the first draft has to be perfect, when in reality writing well is more like rewriting well.
This is just the way the legal business works normally. 95% of civil cases settle before trial because lawyers know the law, don't need to go to court to know what is going to happen, and handle it more efficiently between themselves.
There is a colloquial usage of the word container when it comes to Linux, and it's not what you're referring to, as similar as they may seem.
Humanoid robots are less effective at boosting moods
Please go type a query into bing chat or chatgpt 4 where reasoning is involved and it can answer you. Ask it something you haven't seen.

AI can reason, it might not be the greatest especially at numbers and where there's data contamination but it can do it.

There's something called abductive reasoning, a gift and a curse at the same time.
Copyrights don't protect novelty. Two people can independently create the same thing and both be entitled to copyright. You cannot do that in patent. Only one is an invention in the eyes of the law.

The threshold for originality in copyright is the bare minimum, so it's not a good standard for "invention". Patents have a much higher bar to overcome, and it is hard to put into a simple explanatory phrase.

I think what you are describing in copyright isn't the issue of originality, but determining what is encompassed in a copyrighted work. The court will analyze what the work consists of, and what of it was your expression, as opposed to someone else's. So, it's not novelty exactly but it's close.
"The 'computer' is lying" situation is a problem generally. I didn't receive a 16-port switch and another small item a few years back even though it was noted as delivered. Neither Amazon nor UPS would do anything about it. A couple weeks later (I think it had been snowing) I discovered the package tossed in a ditch to the side of my driveway. Everything was actually fine but I had reordered and didn't have a need for a second switch.
Shards of Silicon Valley Bank Are for Sale, but No One Is Buying Yet
I’m not sure that’s accurate.
When USB is involved, you can always assume they chose the more complicated option.

USB4 is a competing, incompatible method of encapsulating and multiplexing PCIe, DisplayPort and USB data packets over one cable. But the USB4 spec incorporates Thunderbolt as an alternate mode. Thunderbolt support is required for USB4 hubs but optional for USB4 hosts and devices. So you will often (maybe even always, in practice) be able to use a USB4 host port as a Thunderbolt port.
Well I for one, as a person with sophisticated tastes, find the emperor's clothes to be absolutely fabulous, none finer have I ever gazed upon.
I don't think most accidents are cars driving into the backs of other cars?
I was shocked when I first saw someone post a link to it. I was certain it was app only.
A clunky self-replicating thing running a corporation on predatory capitalist principles would not be "an interesting trinket."

We're talking about automating dictatorship, with humans living inside an AI panopticon which is far more intelligent than we are. And far better at manipulating our intellectual and emotional responses than any human dictator to date.

And that's one of the better outcomes. The worst outcome is an AI that decides we're disposable because we're in its way.

Note that all of these are possible even if the AI is not sentient or self-aware. A machine intelligence can be an effective goal seeker, even if it's morally as sophisticated as a room thermostat - which has goals but no concept of what temperature feels like, or why humans can only survive in a certain range.
People in the stable diffusion community have solved this problem using another neural network (ControlNet) to guide stable diffusion output using OpenPose information.
With controlNET you actually get to chose your hand pose though and not just hope for it to be the way you want in Midjourney,
Are we horses?
I think you're being unreasonable. Your examples are closer to spellcheck and punctuation correction. Even they have subtle societal considerations such as Americanising English. A much more appropriate comparison would be Copilot which is being discussed nowadays.
What's luddite about not wanting to read ghostwritten AI stories posted by fake writers? If I want AI stories or art, I can just prompt the models myself and don't need a useless intermediary.

On the bright side, this is likely also going to play out this way and the market for the prompt "artists" will be nonexistent unless they add any value (which they rarely will).
I suspect photos are used for classification and training purposes.
Great comment.

We’re writing a blog post about that right now. Should be up next week.

If you’re curious and would be up for a review, I’d be happy to send it to you first so you can read earlier!
While I still use Google Photos, there are times that I don't want pictures I take with my phone to be synced to the cloud. Since Google Photos does not allow such functionality, I installed a second camera app. That app allows me to choose where the picture are saved, so I save them to a folder that doesn't get backed up by Google Photos.

It's annoying to have to do this, but at least I can finally choose what gets synced and what doesn't.
While it is good that you feel safe from stress and are able to manage the stressors you encounter, it's important to remember that not everyone experiences stress in the same way. Some people face external stressors that are beyond their control, such as financial difficulties, health issues, difficult relationships or even the impact of larger systemic issues.

Stressors can also have a compounding effect, as seen in the Holmes-Rahe Stress Inventory scale.

The scale assigns a numerical value to different life events based on how stressful they are considered to be. The idea is that when a person experiences a series of stressful events, the effects can compound and lead to greater levels of stress and negative health outcomes.

Caffeine can have different effects on different people. While it can help you feel more alert and focused, it can also increase anxiety and insomnia in others. Heightened anxiety resulting from caffeine intake can occur regardless of whether stressors exist in one's life.
"The Greeks invented everything, all else is variation."
Well, head just reads lines. A CSV row can optionally be multiple lines.

Also head doesn't do anything with the data or the format, aside from printing line by line, so doesn't need to know any column names.
Eggs made from male mouse stem cells using error-prone culture
I understand this is about new laws to do with nitrogen use in farming coming into effect in the EU. Holland is one of the first countries to actually move towards compliance the the farmers are not impressed.

Personaly I am with the farmers, why are we burning our farmers and industry on the fire of environmentalism when the future of the environment will be decided by developing countries, not us. There is a balance to be made here.
Another issue is about the clients. In the AR-space, "Enterprise customers" is the secret code to say "military clients".

If Google has the policy to not work with the DoD, then it makes its options very limited (Magic Leap doesn't have such restrictions as far as I know).

The same way they likely didn't appreciate when they were associated with Boston Dynamics.

So, if you can't sell your product for its main useful usage, then it's a bit difficult :/
Free Book: how to be good at languages
20.000 words approx, can be downloaded in PDF.
I do cull/edit my photos but I have scanned photos going back to the 1960s that I look at from time to time.
I’m trying to say that a journalist set out to make a banker look like a corrupt hypocrite, the banker made the journalist look like a fool instead, and then the newspaper committed a hilarious act of mild betrayal by publishing it.
Data point: I have 7T of "photo data". I think some proportion of that is video, but probably no more than 10%. I am quite old and it does include scans of all the film images I've taken since birth, and all of one side of my family's film media scanned, and backups of all the cell phone images from family members' devices. From memory however most of the data comes from digital-era DSLR images which can be 30-40M each.

None of this data is stored in a FAANG company's DC.
The trick is to smoothly pass for a human.
Just downloaded their provided installers for both mac and win, then emailed their customer support ('customersupport@bricklink.com') to enquire about it's license, open source status, and if there's somewhere to download the source code.

Received the automated "we got your message, we'll get to you when we can" style message.

Lets see what they say. :)
I purchased an ancestor of this model 10 years ago. It still works. TEN YEARS! My mother got hers 8 years ago, she's printed over 8,000 sheets (there's a service page you can print that tells you). She's looking at replacing it because it jams sometimes now. What an incredible product, I cannot recommend it enough.
I don’t condone driving while high in the slightest but we allow rampant alcohol consumption leading to substantial annual DUI accidents and deaths. Perhaps let’s consider more roadway enforcement while also appreciating the benefits of non-pharmaceutical therapy. And if you’re just using it at home for fun, that’s fine too, just don’t drive after (people are going to use it whether it’s legal or not of course).

There is some data (although admittedly inconclusive) that opioid use and deaths decline in jurisdictions where marijuana is legalized, an important point to consider.

TLDR some medication is better than others, don’t drive under the influence regardless. “In God We Trust, all others bring data” as the saying goes.
This is a profoundly counterproductive way to approach a debate and I won't engage with it.
I had the same experience in the US Midwest. Weed was far easier to obtain than alcohol, in part because the underground black market has always involved teenagers, and in part because adults able to buy/sell alcohol could get into big trouble supplying it to minors.

I'm sure there are adults willing to illegally provide cannabis to kids, just as there have always been some willing to do so with booze. However, the legal market obliterates much of the underground black market (which is part of the point), so I would expect supplies to be much more limited than in a prohibition environment where the incentive to break the law is already greater for all potential consumers.

In my experience, most adults who can get what they want without breaking the law would far rather do that than take risks they don't have to. Why would I open the door to being thrown in jail to help some children get high? Not to mention all the possible secondary consequences.
I built a GPT cover letter generator
> Would that we respond as fast to the needs of ordinary people as to SVB depositors.

Didn’t they? And aren’t we on the brink of recession due to massive gov handouts? This comment seems to ignore recent history to try to promote socialism.
No ban will happen as we will have an AI "arms" race with every country in the world, particularly China.

AI will allow us to create a new category of automated devices that will allow people to do the job of many in every industry. And we will need a new crew of people to maintain them.
nah, we'll just bore a couple of "vents" so the pressure is managed with timed releases across the globe instead of all at once in one location.

does the fact that Venus has no moon play into the lack of tectonics?
On a long enough timescale, any trace of a precursor civilization would be taken into the earth's crust through tectonic shifts; still curious to think about though.

Closer to today would be Atlantis, if it was an island then it might still be somewhere under the sea / sediment.
I find that adding L-Theanine to my morning's coffee offset a lof of its negative effects. This is a popular ingredient in some "mind booster" products but you can do your own version at home easily by just buying supplement capsules.
"I don't understand how this exemplifies this. Isn't the worry just much simpler: legalization creates in general more accessible weed, and so more teens could get it?"

Be cause the author is doing the very thing they quoted about - they formed an opinion and worked backward to it. Regardless of the good or bad debate, it's generally accepted that access goes up as things are less restricted. That doesn't just apply to pot, but all sorts of other stuff.
I would argue most of the stuff we see even the truly brilliant stuff is the result of a long slog process that usually involving multiple people.
The whole point of UNIX userland is to not have to write a custom program for every simple case that just needs recombining some existing basic programs in a pipeline...
I'm not sure if should post my comment or call the cops on myself.
I was doing just this for a while but stopped because my Mac Mini was too old for the last few OS releases. I then switched to using the Windows iCloud client but a bug from ~2 years ago that consumes tremendous CPU cycles made that less than ideal. (The best you can do is lock it to a single thread, which will then use 100% 24/7)

Now I just don't backup my iCloud, though I do remove everything older than one year every new years to my home server which follows a good 3-2-1 backup strategy.

TL;DR: If you go this route, try to get a Mac Mini that can run a supported macOS for some time to come.
Seems people do not like to cut emissions to help with Climate Change, no surprise there. That to me means no one whats to change their lifestyle. Does not bode well for Climate Change.
> 56°C is the world record temperature, not hot enough.

That sounds like air temperature. Surface temperature gets way hotter. It’s well known you can cook an egg on desert sand.
Huh? jq has far more difficult syntax...
people who study the traffic safety problem area will generally avoid saying the word "accident", just for your information.

https://www.grahamfeest.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/accid...
Single anecdote actually worth much more than an abstract argument
Half-assing is a fun one to spin around.

“We really need to whole-ass this one.”
* The number people who care about whether art was AI generated is only going to decrease as time goes on

* If there is any kind of real value to having this badge, then people will just use it even if they're using AI

* Rejecting technological advancement is like begging for extinction
Sam Altman: If SVB Were Called Farmers Bank of Santa Clara
Who Is Still Inside the Metaverse?
What you mean by "certain terms"? The OP said plenty of definitions are fuzzy. "Species" doesn't even have a rigourous definition when it comes down to it. Pretty much all taxonomies beyond the Standard Model of particle physics are fictions. In science, the only thing that matters is whether a category is useful for analytical purposes.
Expanding ngrok's free plan with security in one line
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJPERZDfyWc
Since the beginning, I've seen the "OpenAI" name as a giant Open-Washing. That works just like Green-Washing, and that works. I have no respect for this practice.
Not if creators are paid nothing for their work. I think inescapably, the profession of writing is about to take a big hit from GPT-X, with the few remaining journalists paid considerably less than before. There will be an exodus of talent, leaving... Microsoft and Google to write our news for us?
I have 4 backups (and growing) of all my important digital things especially my photos. I have two separate overlapping backups and every few year I buy a new hard drive and put the old backup drive in storage. I will continue to do this until I die.
I immediately knew which model it was before I opened the link. I bought one for grad school in 2010, my mom uses it now and it's holding up just fine in 2023. Toner cartridge prices are reasonable, considering it takes a long time to use one up.

Thankfully one of the few businesses whose CEOs didn't think this was a problem that required a software solution.
A painting or story made by artificial intelligence is not human because it does not have a life story behind it. I still enjoy reading the artist's biography, some of his correspondence, trying to understand his creative process. If you pour your heart into your work we can bond through human experience, maybe we can even sit down and talk. An AI does not fear death or loneliness. Sometimes I think that part of this site's audience only considers art from a consumer-product perspective. For me it goes a little further.
Why is it worse for AI and not for nukes?
On the BrickLink Studio-Site they mention the License for ffmpeg and have a download-link for it. So I assume they are generally cool with these things.
I don't think Netflix has a particular problem; maintaining series for more than a couple of seasons has always been hard in broadcasting. It's easier to spot now because people have complete visibility: instead of caring about a couple of series in key time slots, they can know care about all series, so it's more noticeable that most series die a sad death. Addressing off-ramps in a nicer way would be an innovation. The problem is that production costs are so high, that keeping a losing franchise running is extremely expensive.

On the other hand, Google plays in a field where maintenance costs are a rounding error. You can basically freeze a product and keep it running forever for pennies, and these products get embedded in our daily lives, which is why killing it looks so bad - I can always pick up a new series with zero effort, whereas migrating off a productive service takes time and effort.
Another reason I saw was that models were trained on 512x512 "portrait" images including very few hands. Added to the inherent complexity of hands, this throw off their generation.
Then it only proves their point ;)
No, the license has multiple requirements before that, including giving users a copy of the license and a written offer for source code.

Lego is only compliant if they follow the conditions of the license. The first condition include this:

"... and give any other recipients of the Program a copy of this License
along with the Program.".

Do Lego do this? What I can find is this page which does not include a copy of the GPL or a link to it: https://studiohelp.bricklink.com/hc/en-us/articles/660631342...
You're describing over fitting to some look up table.

Can't be what's happening here. Because the examples LLMs are answering are well out of bounds of the "100^2" training data.

The internet is huge but it's not that huge. One can easily find chatGPT saying, doing or creating things that obviously come from a generalized model.

It's actually trivial to find examples of chatGPT answering questions with responses that are wholly unique and distinct from the training data, as in the answer it gave you could not have existed anywhere on the internet.

Clearly humans don't need that much training data. We can form generalizations from a much smaller sample size.

This does not indicate that for machine learning a generalization doesn't exist in LLMs when clearly the answers demonstrate that it does.
Ideally, AI art would be tagged on any large platform and AI artists would be forced to compete in a race to the bottom against all their fellow prompters.
Direct link to TikTok that appears part way into the article, which explains the title of the article: https://www.tiktok.com/@pearlmania500/video/7207941159811960...

The gist of it is, Circuit City closed and anyone could say they had worked there to pad their resume because there was no one left at Circuit City to confirm or deny that they had or hadn't worked there. The article/TikTok'er is positing that because Twitter doesn't have a functional HR department, you could effectively say you worked at Twitter and get away with it.
They've been doing it continuously for a year in Ukraine.
> Put it in the trash instead where it goes to safe, well regulated American facilities.

Is this verified? I have a theory (and haven't bothered to investigate so that one's on me) that a lot of recycling is just parceling it up and exporting it to landfill or incinerators abroad.

Mind you, the plastics found in the ocean should be traceable back to their origins; they may be from e.g. Asian rivers, but if the origin is from the US or Europe you know whose fault it is.
Where does a color stop being yellow and start being green? This is the classic lumping and splitting debate. It's obvious that the mere existence of multuple options for lumping and splitting doesn't imply there are no meaningful distinctions to be made.

I dislike this obvious and offensive dishonesty. We can define race quite easily: A race is a largely endogamous extended family group. But but but that means you could call Yoruba people a race! Well sure, you can. Just like we can call the English or even the Cornish a race. When the Angle race and the Saxon race became exogamous with respect to each other, their distinction faded and a new Anglo-Saxon race came to be. We can also talk about a British race, by descent from William the Conqueror. I believe the Chinese have a notion of five Chinese races. In fact, the notion of lumping races as continental scale groups is an American innovation that is of dubious anthropological value. Point being that you can lump up to all humans being a single race going back to the first humans or split down to the nuclear family[1]. It's clear to me that both of those extremes aren't very interesting, but they are valid! As for useful places to lump and split, genetic screening is an obvious one. As an example, choosing to split intelligently will allow a health service to save money by avoiding unnecessarily testing for sickle cell disease.

It follows that for two typical individuals of the same race, you have to go less far up their family tree to find a common ancestor than you would for two typical individuals of different races. This effect is considerably more pronounced if you restrict it to common ancestors from before 1492. Of course 1492 isn't the only date where this effect is seen. For just one example, most Britons have a common ancestor from slightly after 1066.

[1] Nuclear meaning no longer able to be split (physicists weakened that metaphor a bit though!).

Edit: The redefinition goes the other way, as can be seen from public domain sources like Webster's where the first sense of race is "The descendants of a common ancestor; a family, tribe, people, or nation, believed or presumed to belong to the same stock; a lineage; a breed."

I will happily agree that the contemporary lowbrow usage of race to mean black people or white people, and I dunno maybe let's lump everyone else together as asian except some white or black people are hispanic instead doesn't even rise to the level of being childishly stupid.
If you have a money printer it's hard to care about other things.