skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
These are great, but Loom discussions almost always mix details with issues of the API.

It's hard to fathom what that means for end developers.

Will anything at all change but performance?

What are the practical implications beyond that?

We just don't bother with Executors and live happily?
here is the solution if your phone is not turning on. keeps showing samsung logo
> The journal accepts that some readers may wrongly have inferred

I am confused. What is the Lancet blaming its readers for? Why was this inference wrong?
I've used Blender only a little, but surely you're aware of the Asset Browser introduced in the 3.0? They seem easy enough to use, but of course they'd need to be high-quality to work similarly with all renderers.

Granted I don't actually know where to find such libraries except for the small free asset bundles at https://www.blender.org/download/demo-files/#assets or perhaps by paying Blender organization for them, so maybe this doesn't really address your core point :).
It’s etcd default https://etcd.io/docs/v3.5/dev-guide/limit/#storage-size-limi...

There’s also max object size of 1MB on the apiserserver side I believe
It's not actually a pun (at least, AFAIK), but interestingly, 肛門 (anus) is an homophone of 後門 (back gate).
Even with coolify or dokku you still have to manage the machine, those tools just simplify deployment. You still have to take care of host-level security and maintenance. Which is a hassle when all you really want is to stick your app somewhere and have it run.
OTH: If the warnings can't have false positives, they would be errors.

There's a lot to talk about 'warning hygiene', it's part of the daily life of C/C++ coders since it's very common that existing 'warning clean' code bases suddenly spam new warnings after upgrading compilers to a new version (that's also why it's good advice to not lambast an unfamiliar code base for having warnings before investigating why that is, it may simply have been developed with a slightly older compiler version than yours).

I don't agree with the author though: warnings should be turned to 11, then investigated, and locally suppressed if they turn out to be false positives (which is very frequent if you turn the warning level to max - also because some of the 'fringe warnings' are merely coding style suggestions).

Also: static analyser tools almost always depend on additional hints outside the language spec (usually provided through asserts), without those additional hints all static analysers produce a ton of false positives because C and C++ alone don't provide the builtin language features to express enough 'intent' to the analyser.
No, they are refusing to provide free artefact hosting to startups.
I’ve run it with over 50G under heavy load (10k+ qps) and it was fine. It’s pretty sensitive to disk latency though
There are some very explicit images for the default prompt when one scrolls a bit around there, can't imagine that OpenAI would not filter these out.
David Brailsford is an absolute gem, he speaks at length on Numberphile and Computerphile on YouTube: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUTypj9XuPp4YBaHucPvr-zis...

He has a video about Dennis' thesis here: https://youtu.be/82TxNejKsng
It’s the underlying db limit (boltdb) which both etcd and consul use
Linkedin is a bit weird. They'll sometimes let you in, but other times force you to login. It's not even A/B testing, they've been at it for years. It does make it way easier to just not bother using their crummy site though.
best website to blast rotten dating and girlfriends. without character limits and anonymously this site allows you to post things about sex, terror, politics, hacking and all the crap that interests us.
Portable Rusage Command
I thought it apt to describe GPT3 as an alpha, because it did very well on language tasks and not so much on typical beta stuff, like math. Once it acquires well integrated hardcore logical solving abilities, then it'll not only be alpha or beta, but looking for ways to control its superhuman powers. Otherwise it'll go of on a tangent and kill itself in an infinite loop or put humanity in one.

On your question: how do we do it? We also have memorized the basics and apply a heuristic to do something more complicated, if necessary by analogy. Which is what GPT seems to be good at.
SF community college without heat: 'It's hard to function'
Yet almost inevitably whenever a point is raised about authors getting paid by OpenAI/Microsoft for using their work in closed LLMs, the most common fallacy you get here on HN is that the LLM is “learning” from online content and if humans can learn from what they read freely then we shouldn’t restrict AI from doing the same.

If it’s not a humanlike sentient being, then it should be acknowledged as a tool that automatically repackages someone else’s creative work, which should be a violation of intellectual property rights if it’s done for profit of LLM’s operator and without agreement or attribution of the author. Since the legally responsible actor is OpenAI/Microsoft, it is not about preventing any intelligent being from “learning”.

But if it is such a being that is a legally human-equivalent actor all on its own, then sure, it can scrape and read online content all it wants—and it also should have rights to not be abused or owned by anyone.

We shouldn’t be so naive as to let them have it both ways.
Google Glass wasn't really AR, more like a smart watch taped to your face, so I can imagine there being little business adoption. HoloLens seems much more promising, but development still seems to be slow.

I'd love to see AR succeed but with the current price I doubt it'll gain popularity in the near future.
Too late, that lovely con man/women has already taken everyone's hearts by storm.
> You would think that a developer-focused strategy would involve open-source, and that doing things to decrease their influence on the open-source world would reduce their influence

The influence you are talking about is negative: increasing control means increasing arbitrary behaviour, which means increasing your risks as a platform user, which means masses of pessimists fleeing to saner competitors who don't seem willing to take away your toys.
It's very similar to existing image search services and it's impersonating another company fraudulently. Flagging it.
Is that why Duck Duck Go results have been so useless recently?
You would be surprised.

I know a government agency storing their entire list of all credentials for every one of their IT services and servers in an .ods file.

I introduced them to password managers, but it was too hard for them. SSH keys? Too hard.

I managed to make they bite the bullet of using keypass.

Then they lost their master password.

And went back to the .ods file.

So I can buy it.
How does the code `((rot triangle) base-box)` work? Is it a higher order function — in LISP the car is taken to be a function name to call, so it seemed odd to me to see a list used for this, `(rot triangle)`.
I don't know what 8k is or who this person is.
https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/campaigns/met...

is a better example of that work from 15+ years back in just the resource sector (minus the AI woo, just with the factoid extraction and additional cross linking to global mineral lease).
> I'm pointing out that it making those assumptions is the result of a bias. A biases that was collected from training data that may or may not be statistically true

Schrödinger's Bias.
What is really interesting is that we are so accustomed to the tale of dominance and tribes that we are taking it for granted (because we live in it). Love and kindness, how naive it may sound is the bedrock of cooperation and humans have a hard time grappling with the concept that. We want to be wise (well some of us) yet what wisdom means is insight into our behavior from the bottom up. We are at a crossroads of a moment of what we want to be. We are often led into being by our circumstances and conditioning, and that is still a relic of our evolution, but also a door for the one willing to look at it. If AI is really smarter than us, I also hope it is also wise, because the two are not the same.
Did you stop reading that sentence halfway through? There's room for disruptions in that schedule. But that room isn't infinite and this is going to add a lot more disruption on top of the existing expected amount.
Among all the fuss about typography, the authors have overlooked the most important detail about the PHD thesis, which was that Dennis Ritchie was the inventor of Brainfuck.
I'm confused.

I thought normal replay attacks are solved and the issue here is more to do to forward they key range close to the car to simulate the car.key being close.

That's what I can't easily just solve if not needing a button on the key which defeats the purpose of the said feature
'not actionable' and 'no real argument' seem weird things to say to a critique of a bad book, bad author, genre, bad reviews and bad bestseller list (NYT); each person can make their mind up without needing me or anyone to tell them what to do.
If I was in the business of telling people what to do I'd say "Avoid these things, also learn telltale signs of superficial reviews and groupthink".
On a deeper level I suggested it's worth considering what led to Diamond ever being lauded as a phony expert on negotiation (or, if you think it's self-evident that the NYT is not worth paying attention to and blurbs and Amazon reviews are shilled, then I'd appreciate where you find better book recommendations, other than word-of-mouth.)

> Do you want to crusade against bad books?

I don't see that calling a bad book and author bad constitutes crusading; that seems like twisting a straightforward discussion. Instead of trying to impute motives, I think you're just saying "it seems to me futile to object to superficiality, just ignore it", is that right? (Conversely, do you want to crusade against HN posts which you deem to be non-actionable? Presumably you don't either.)

I did also nod towards a wider ongoing discussion about superficiality vs authenticity as pops up in Po Bronson, Chuck Palahniuk, HN [https://hn.algolia.com/?q=superficial], Susan Cain, Haemin Sunim, Viktor Frankl... that took me a couple of sentences, still not a crusade.
There is a difference in this case between 'unlimited' and 'unmetered'. The limit is on the throughput (1Gbps) rather than the total bandwidth which is itself naturally limited by the throughput x time.

That being said I could still see this being against TOS if you end up chewing up SSDs, hosting dodgy content or running at full power constantly.
Heard but not seen personally about at least one situation like OP described (in Europe). Senior level, top pay, huge company without an engineering culture obviously (not tech).
> a place that spends too much time on slack and too much time on email

That describes most large companies.

While I agree it’s an obvious use case, the first startup to reliably extract the signal from the noise of daily communication at big organizations will make huge piles of money.

And whoever can do the same for Europeans while pretending to comply with GDPR, and probably a bunch of other related smaller markets. China without accidentally mentioning 1989 or cartoon bears. And so on.
If there are no new shares, it's hard to prefer them.
Lol that's so funny. That picture is exactly the printer I have. It is indeed fine :)

However unfortunately brother is not free of skullduggery anymore. Recently there was an issue with a firmware update refusing to calibrate unofficial color toners.

Mine is black and white so this issue doesn't apply but it's pretty bad IMO.
>This strange set of circumstances raises at least three broad questions ...

>- Why wasn't the degree granted?"

According to [1]

"in 1968, he defended his PhD thesis on "Computational Complexity and Program Structure" at Harvard under the supervision of Patrick C. Fischer. However, Ritchie never officially received his PhD degree as he did not submit a bound copy of his dissertation to the Harvard library, a requirement for the degree."

So he had bigger and better things to do than mere filing. Plausible!

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Ritchie#:~:text=Howev....
The other posts on the blog are great as well. I've set out to make some tiny projects myself this year, and it's going better than I've imagined.

There are no big homeruns, but I feel like a different kind of person.

To paraphrase "Build what you can (and love), until you love to build."
Protecting art against AI mimicry
> probably Dennies Richie sent his manuscript to a professional typist who provided services to the university,

Maybe, but I think everyone in a position like Ritchie's had a personal secretary whose main task was being a professional typist.

>* unless he was adept at spend several hours typing until he got professional results.

Typing was tedious and error prone, that's why people dictated to secretaries who wrote it down in shorthand to type it cleanly later.

I think the role of the secretary at that time is immensely undervalued. Not only had they be good in shorthand and typing but they also served as a kind of editor to check the manuscript for spelling and grammar errors.

Also, for everyone used to that system the introduction of the computer and the burden to type yourself was considered a step back.
Anyone else notice TenetLang looks an awful lot like Motoko?
I assume that is what they want. Without the jucy margins on running the containers hosting images is never going to be profitable.
Yes, SSRIs are actually commonly prescribed for IBS. Something like 90% of the serotonin in your body is in your gut. Psychedelics like Shrooms and LSD, which mimic serotonin, completely cut off appetite. The effects of SSRIs on weight are various. Serotonergic drugs are a huge class, it's hard to classify their effects, but primarily they are gastrointenstinal and psychological. All I know is that I've taken enough acid now where even caffeine makes me trip out a little. Still drinking green tea though. There's some anxiolytic compound in there, L-theanine, which mitigates the negative effects of caffeine use.
You can earn money with your AI prompts
ePromptly is a platform that enables prompt engineers to securely publish prompts and earn money from them. With ePromptly, you earn money each time someone uses your prompt, while you keep the text of the prompt confidential. It works for GPT and Dall·E.
Do you have collateral
I really like this. At some point fairly early in my life, teenage years I think, I decided that it is a fact that anything I commit to myself that I'll do, I will indeed do. I don't recall exactly when or how it happened, but I do know it's something consciously decided was the case.

As far as I could tell at the time, it had been true for any "serious" commitments thus far, and it's kind of a comforting feeling that if something is in your control, and you decide to do it, it will happen. Having made that affirmation, it because somewhat self-reinforcing, because even when something got hard, I didn't want to break the streak, and thereby... I guess, no longer be able to rely on myself in the same way. I think it's meant both that I'm somewhat careful about what I truly commit to myself to do, but also that I always have extra motivation when I do. (And of course, some degree of after-the-fact rationalization helps too; I'm sure I've consciously let myself off the hook on occasion when the situation changes.)

Anyway, that's a lot of rambling to basically say I think I've been practicing shoshikantetsu most of my life without knowing the term.
A good strategy is to use -Werror in development mode and CI builds, but not in 'distribution mode' (or alternatively: use -Werror for your own code, but not for imported libraries).
You’re also forgetting her saga about environmental poisoning with her apartment. It seems to me she could have Munchausen's syndrome, and certainly applies it to many things beyond health. Her Apple stuff loses very important context to the non-internal Apple world. It seems she very much sees herself as a victim and actively encourages that viewpoint on Twitter.
- "Dr John Snow: This well-known physician died at noon, on the 16th instant, at his house in Sackville Street, from an attack of apoplexy. His researches on chloroform and other anaesthetics were appreciated by the profession."

Interesting to contrast this with the modern version, on Wikipedia:

- "Snow suffered a stroke while working in his London office on 10 June 1858. He was 45 years old at the time.[38] [...] It has been speculated that his premature death may have been related to his frequent exposure and experimentation with anesthetic gases, which is now known to have numerous adverse health effects. Snow administered and experimented with ether, chloroform, ethyl nitrate, carbon disulfide, benzene, bromoform, ethyl bromide and dichloroethane during his lifetime.[40]"
Editing, to me, is changing the content of the text.

Using another font, using a different way to represent numerals, or using bold text, isn't editing, it's formatting and styling. When my webbrowser renders markdown to html, it's not editing the text, its reformatting it.
The workforce is apparently not diverse?
Getting punched in the mouth is pretty far from a walk in the park.
I suspect that dockerhub isn't the part that bleeds money, I suspect like many tech companies the part that bleeds money is sales costs and developer costs (see gitlab). Unfortunately I can't prove that though.

Docker downsized from 400(!) to 60 people a few years back, and a quick search on Google says they're now back up at 600 employees again. They have ARR of $50M [0] , which is probably a little short of paying 60 people SV salaries, but it's nowhere near enough to pay for 600 people.

As regards to the registry problem, "most companies" I suspect don't follow best practices and in fact do end up using docker hub for things like public images, but more importantly _there is no way to enforce this in the tool, and docker have refused to implement this when given a PR_.

[0] https://techcrunch.com/2022/02/01/docker-makes-comeback-reac...
> Probably nothing you would find particularly shocking or bizarre.

That just makes me even more nervous...
LLMs are the new CPUs.. but, is OpenAI the new Intel?
I have to disagree with that. Like maybe for a toy example to demonstrate what I'm talking about, imagine I was teaching you the addition operation mod 100 and I gave a description of the operation f(x, y) = x + y % 100 for x, y in Z_100. If you take more than 100^2 samples to learn the function, I'm not sure you understand the function. Obviously, in that many samples, you could've just specified a look up table without understanding what each operation is doing or what the underlying domain is.

Part of why sample efficiency is interesting is that humans have high sample efficiency since they somehow perform reasoning and this generalizes well to some pretty abstract spaces. As someone who's worked with ML models, I'm genuinely envious of the generalization capabilities of humans and I think it's something that researchers are going to have to work on. I'm pretty sure there's still a lot of skepticism in academia that scale is everything needed to achieve better models and that we're still missing lots of things.

Some of my skepticism around claims of LLMs reasoning or performing human like things is that they really appear to not generalize well. Lots of the incredible examples people have shown are very slightly out of the bounds of the internet. When you start asking it for hard logic or to really synthesize something novel outside the domain of the internet, it rapidly begins to fail seemingly in proportion to the amount of knowledge the internet may have on it.

How might we differentiate being a really good soft/fuzzy lookup table of the internet that is able to fuzzily mix language together from genuine knowledge and generalization. This might just be a testament to the sheer scope and size of the internet in how much apparent capabilities GPT has.

This isn't to say they cannot be useful ever, a lot of work is derivative, but I think there's a large portion of the claim that it's understanding things that's unwarranted. Last I checked, chatGPT was giving wrong answers for the sums of very large numbers which is unusual if it understands addition.
>I'd imagine that we'd all be wearing AR glasses by now.

Am I the asshole here for being happy that future never came to pass?

People are already zombies addicted to their phones, tracked and monetized to hell by advertisers, so I feel like gluing it to their eyes with cameras constantly scanning everything they look at, is some dystopian nightmare I never want to see.
I imagine people in the actual real world looking at a story like this and wondering why someone's teacup soap opera in the SV tech bubble rises to worthiness to broadcast an installment of the world's most boring soap opera.
For sure, but django for instance is really good at turning something that ought to be one query into N+1 queries.
It depends on your stack and app type, but I had great experience with Ghost Inspector https://ghostinspector.com/
>They come to me because we were a family, and we still are.

They most definitely are not. They are in an employment relationship.
They're here. We have to stop them before it's too late!
>Having a village full of people who don’t engage with each other because they’ve found more interesting people online is troubling.

Maybe we should think creating a world where everyone can move around and form the sorts of villages they like.
Yes, hence the term "underwater on your mortgage" entered the everyday American vernacular.
Chat GPT4: Is the world prepared for the coming AI storm?
Dang, dang, you are one hell of a mod. I can't believe you are giving me a 3rd chance. I will try my best. As my username suggests, this was a joke account, but I have come to appreciate this place. You're tolerance has given me pause.
Depends a lot on the application tech stack. A generic tool is usually the worst idea. Further, I would recommend writing tests along the axis of minimum change.
Yes, but banks owned all the tranches. Not just the premium ones. So most of them did not pay out as expected.
Yes, `rot` is a higher order function that expects a function argument and returns another function as the result. In Scheme the car does not have to be a name.
Children as young as 3 years old are capable of lying
I'm still very sore with Atlassian for their decision to close down Hipchat. Maybe Slack was beating Hipchat in the popularity stakes, but I spent a huge amount of time at a previous job building integrations (or whatever they were called) which would, for instance, allow colleagues to setup a new client project (Google Drive directories and files, Assembla project management stuff, Trello tracking for the project etc, etc) with a simple `/build project-name client-name` comment in a Hipchat room and then, one day ... all of it gone!

I really wish the devs of this new shiny the best with their endeavours ... but that wound still smarts!