skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> there isn't anything online I can find which supports sanctioning this specific company.

They are a part of Russia's electronic manufacturing infrastructure. Electronics like the one used in the missiles that fall on Ukrainian residential buildings, schools, hospitals, civilian power supplies, and so on. As such, the ethics is pretty clear - until Russia stops the terror campaign against Ukrainian civilians (at least), any company that is involved in enabling this campaign is ethically evil. It's not some complex conundrum - if a missile hits a residential high-rise, and you took part in making that missile, then you participated in that crime, even if indirectly.

> Should all russian companies shut down because of the war?

All that contribute to the war effort - yes, that would be a nice thing. Not really possible, practically, but nice. Realistically, probably only the most prominent get sanctioned, and they probably won't be shut down - just cut off from using Western resources.

> Would this be what we expect from all western companies, like when we attacked Iraq because of Weapons of Mass Destruction?

If Iraq wants to sanction all western companies, they are certainly free to do so. So far I don't think they had a slightest inclination to do it.
Reporting on bad experiences that are experienced occurs at equal rates between men and women.

It's similar to the well-known gender suicide "paradox": women are much more likely to report thinking suicidal thoughts than men, but men commit suicide far more often than women. The way masculinity is constructed discourages reporting unhappiness or bad experiences.
Using Karat services tells a lot more about the company than the candidate.

I guess it could be generalized that these companies are more likely to value philosophies that are similar to a few of these abhorrent practices-

1. Flawed concepts of "Meritocracy" based hiring/promotions

2. Stack ranking

3. RIF's based on some extremely shortsighted metrics like quarterly revenue numbers

4. PIP style performance improvements

5. More MBA types managing engineering teams

...

The only place I see Karat style services fit is to eliminate 'noise' candidates from DDOS'ing the entry level hire pipeline.
The quantity of money without the velocity of money is only half an indicator.
I've got a multi-gigabyte folder of portable windows programs and utilities, where parts have been untouched for 15+ years. For the most part, everything still runs.

Winamp? Check.

Spacemonger? Check.

FLAC encoder? MP3 encoder? Notepad++? Savihost? TheGodfather? Flash Player? MS XML Notepad? ConEmu? Some really old build of CockroachDB? CPU-Z? Doom Builder 2? HexChat? Hell, even mIRC? Check check check check check checkity check.

None of those have been updated in years, many untouched (but not unused) since the day I installed them. This is why the web is so effing stupid. (And a hat tip towards Microsoft for keeping promises, unlike web developers)

And in many cases they STILL work better than the crappy little my-first-webapps that everyone uses instead nowadays.

Software is and should be eternal. It's these damn platforms that nobody wants to hold still with.
The Linux kernel is literally the only thing I could think of where you could argue as such.
They will just outsource and deal with the time zone issues. For now they have the best of both worlds.
Both can be very easily disabled in the settings. I did, am and still pleased with Edge overall.
I certainly think they're emblematic of changes in attitudes, but I think the direction of causation is not so clear.
I don't understand the purpose of dumping fuel on the drone. Were the expecting to kill its motor? Go out of control and crash? Catch fire?
How do we even know or gauge how well it actually does?

I see a lot of people randomly poking it - some get extraordinary responses and some are duds. Given all the possible things people could ask how do we know how well it does? Simply correcting obviously wrong responses does nothing to correct the obviously wrong response it will give to some other prompt.
I'm a man and experienced toxic workplace culture at the mercy of a female superior.
How is that an excuse? What do you define an excuse as?
Why are you still using it if you know it’s so broken?
I call nonsense, have worked for large comoany. Processes are long, bureaucracy is huge, yes, but in no case there was never enough work to fill peoples desks, from software engineers to HR, wtf? The unemployment comparison from company to whole society stinks, too, and there are examples that even 0% unemployment can be true, but again not sure how this relates to a company.
Typescript for a while has focused on Stage 3 and Stage 4 proposals, so its "core elements" are almost all already in the language.

Unless you mean the type annotations itself? The good news there is that there is a Stage 1 proposal to take the Python/Ruby approach of bringing them into the language: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations

Were that to happen, that proposal doesn't apply any type checking semantics for the browsers themselves and you would still want a type checker, such as Typescript, to actually check the types that are annotated. (Just as you want to run Mypy or Sorbet, respectively, in the cases of Python/Ruby.)
Natural language processing/understanding/generation is solved (at least in English).

LLMs produce perfectly fluent output and can understand natural language input as well as any human.

However knowledge representation is not solved. We still don't know how to interface a perfect LLM to other systems in the same way a human does things like looking up facts we aren't confident of or using a calculator to do math we cant' do in our head.

These are very significant problems and super important. But they are more adjacent to NLP in the same way tasks like something like Text-to-SQL [1] isn't a pure NLP task.

[1] for example https://github.com/salesforce/WikiSQL
Documentation is a first class citizen in elixir. It's like all the best of many modern language developers got together and built something beautiful
AWS outages are, per the status page, quite rare.
FDIC took over because SVB failed to make a margin call Thursday 9 March. Not having the money today while operating as a going concern, and having the money never after a liquidation, are different things.
I'm curious as to why it's not considered to be a DMCA circumvention of a technology.
What happened with Linear? Didn't get a chance to use it in anger yet but was looking forward to it.
Right. I don‘t understand the HN crowd. A Haskell thread every weak, tons of people arguing that <current year> will be the breakthrough of lisp on desktop, but they scream for OO patterns in their frontend frameworks.
To serve as an example to North Korea to show what happens if you agree to give up your nuclear weapons program.

Oh, wait...
Sorry: a text in its actualization is the product of the cooperation of the reader and the text as written. (This is basic text theory.) So, I guess, in-memory structures are not for you, as this is a/the common term. It's true, the text highlights creepiness, both in a genre and the terminology, but don't shoot the messenger. Why is tech referring to such things as "anatomy" or "build"? (The apparent overlap just highlights an already existing semantic disposition. Also, you should have stopped long before this, when the male narrator was portrayed as without any empathy or interest but cold curiosity.)
The bread that Subway sell is legally classed as a cake in some places IIRC
See also the GPT-4 technical report, page 37.

https://images.app.goo.gl/vRP8368Z17zW2hvC9
It's the other way around. Google announced two days ago, same day as GPT4 (hence why not many people remember it).
It still has the same ad time allocation as cable, but I frequently see random nature videos in place of them or the option to switch to them. My wife doesn't see it as much as I do so your milage may vary.
Just don’t think too hard about the carbon footprint of that ChatGPT bot
> Even if AI is just "faster artist", it doesn't necessarily mean the the laws should treat AI and human artists in the same say.

I think that's an entirely different discussion to have. I think AI generators are not faster artists, they're generative tools. Given the amount of prompt engineering and output editing, I'd say significant human input and creativity is still involved. Even in cases where no such work is being done by a human, it's just a generator, not a person. We have been making generated artwork for as long as computers exist, it's just that the quality, artistic range, and accessibility have made a jump now.

> Car is just a faster way to let you move from A to B. But laws treat cars and pedestrians vastly different.

I would say the laws treat printing presses differently from computers, but so far we haven't had any laws (that I know of) trying to protect human typesetters from modern DTP software.

> Laws are extremely inconsistant.

True.
Is it hard to sell half a company you bought for a $1? Seems like more of a psychological problem than a technical one..

I mean sure the whole market could realize your purchase was an absurd liability, but they would still be immune as long as they only own their fraction, so unless the whole market prefers your bankruptcy over a free bet..
The trick here will be using large models as data generators to distill some sub task into a web computable model. (I’ve done it a few times for vision rather than text and it’s amazing how potent it is.)
I might finally invest some time into what it looks like to create front ends independent of any of the existing frameworks that exist today, which I think is probably controversial

Do it. Don't be afraid to, either.

Over the years, I've put together a list of some big and VERY big companies whose web developers hand-code their web sites without assistance from the framework-du-jour.

I recently learned about a new one for my list: A nine-figure household name tech company.

The list is useful for when I'm in bars or developer meetups or coffee shops and someone who's only been putting together web sites for a few years starts preaching about how whatever shiny new thing they just learned about in junior college is the one and only way to do things.
Backwards compatibility with class components still exists. It will exist in the future.
The RIAA filed a lawsuit against Napster in December 1999. A preliminary injunction to block RIAA music on Napster was granted in August, 2000. Napster appealed and the circuit court upheld the injunction in February 2001. The injunction was effective as of March 2001 and Napster shut down in July 2001. Some of the lawsuit was settled out of court in September 2001. Napster went bankrupt in September 2002.

So that's 15 months for a slam-dunk injunction. Today it wouldn't take as long since there's case law backing them up. But if the RIAA had spent 2 years sending emails and writing blog posts, they wouldn't have gotten anywhere either.
I don't know that this is the case for the lady in the article, but usually recruiters/sourcers at these companies are on contract for 12 months max, due to the hiring company not wanting them to appear as employees and thus not get full benefits.
The guy appeared to claim there is a difference in male and female behavior. This is not misogyny.
Also, Angular relies on parts of the "experimental" decorators that these Stage 3 decorators do not support, so Angular likely will continue to use the "experimental" compiler flag for some time to come, with the added twist that some uses of decorators will now also compile without the flag but will exhibit different behavior and won't run correctly, which may cause all sorts of new headaches for Angular developers.
>> Noting was hidden. Losses were clearly reported. Check out page 125 of their 10k for excruciating detail. This misinformation needs to stop.

Note: AFS treatment reports the BOOK VALUE not MARKET VALUE

You can read this: https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/accounting/a... to understand AFS vs MTM treatment.

Losses are reported, definitely not clearly. Losses are hidden under "Other Comprehensive Income." If you want to be transparent about it, then it should show up in the Profit and Loss. You'd choose MTM accounting treatment. Not choosing MTM accounting treatment is literally hiding the losses into a vague bucket of income.
Fluency = NLP

Knowledge representation is a separate problem. NLP gives us some insights into what works here, but the multi-modal aspects of things like GPT4 show there is a lot more to knowledge presentation than just NLP.
Can you provide an example of something you'd see in common use that is 1) not provided by an existing library (such that you are consuming a complex type rather than writing it) and is 2) "out of reach for all but language experts"?
No, that is not known at this time. It will take a few years to fully wind down the assets so as of right now no one knows if recovery will be <100%, 100% of deposits, or >100% of deposits (in which case general creditors may get some money).

The only thing we can be certain of is shareholders are wiped out and general creditors will take a significant haircut.
>It's solitary, sedentary, and passive.

People probably said the same about reading at several points in history. It's about how you use the technology, not the technology itself.
SVB catered to business customers, so the FDIC essentially bailed out businesses. If a regular bank failed with your average-joe customers, I'll wager FDIC won't do anything.

It's always when the rich get screwed, rules get bent. I'll be curious to see when a bank for retail customers get screwed, but I hope it never happens.
So is any fiber optic cable, so “AI” is at least as smart as that.
Funny you mention archaeology. Humans used to apply our excess productivity to building pyramids!
Say you generate a picture with an AI like midjourney, who's the artist? It's fair to say it's midjourney right? Except midjourney isnt an artist, it's a machine. But a machine can only copy. Or you're saying a machine can be an artist.
It's also an internal organizational thing. Anything with a YouTube label is managed by the YouTube org within Google. So Google Music -> YouTube Music was not just a rebrand, it was a new codebase managed by a new team (although some engineers likely moved over).
Did they tell it to write in Victorian style so it would be more polite?
"I think that is not merited. Deep neural models have their own set of problems,"

But I think that is the issue...going forward wouldn't you hire a machine learning specialist rather than an NLP specialist for those problems? As far industry goes, is there any value in all the syntax/semantics/phonology theory NLP folks command?
This is because it takes work to make work. There's planning, and scoping, and cross-functional coordination, and, and, and.

From that angle its easy to understand why a manager would like to do little, as long as their manager has a similar relationship with them.
It's just the new hotness, that's all. When something comes down the pike and people get very excited about it, the tendency is to think it's the answer to All The Things.

This is particularly true with languages.

It will settle down, and Rust will become a respectable addition to the collection of useful languages. When that happens, it will have it's advocates and fans like any other language, but it all won't seem quite so over-the-top.

I've seen this same pattern play out many, many times over the years.
In context of benefit to society this should be a tremendously smaller amount as what we do to drive
How far does it differ from the SfC’s stated attitude towards enforcement? I guess that they are behaving the way they said they would, and maybe you dislike that but you could at least have predicted it. Do they say they do something different?
Founder Considerations for a Cash Management Policy
A token-smuggling jailbreak for ChatGPT-4
> In that case, they can remove all JS weirdness from it, simplify it, add a proper standard library, and add other good parts from other (especially functional) languages to it.

Have you tried Scala.js? It's pretty much what you're asking for - a first-class functional language with all the things you'd expect from that, with compile-to-JS as something that works and feels fully first-class (and good integration with TypeScript types via ScalablyTyped).
Right, exactly. When Walgreens says "Walgreens feels very strongly that labor unions do not serve the best interests of our individual employees or the company as a whole," they are lying. Walgreens is not a person. It does not feel anything. You might apply this to their leadership instead, but it's also understood that Walgreen's leadership is also lying. They are quite aware that a labor union would better serve their individual employees. It's just culturally accepted that corporations can nakedly lie about this sort of stuff and it doesn't matter.

What a company says "We prefer thing X," everything they say after that is just the autocomplete of ChatGPT with a prompt "make up reasons why X is good." They're not their actual justifications. Their actual justifications are usually readily apparent, but it's comes across better to just make inane statements than to speak the truth.

Political interviews have the same problem. You ask the politician a significant question with a yes/no answer. The politician says "this is important" and then makes noises for 20 seconds. The noises don't matter. They don't say anything. What they're actually doing is declining to answer, but culturally it's acceptable to do it this way, and it's unclear why.
Most depositors treat US banks as magic entities where they can safely store unlimited amounts of funds.

Why, I do not understand.
So why do you scream for OO patterns in frontend frameworks?
I just asked ChatGPT to tell me about one of my companies. It did describe it in half arsed way and spat out some BS including wrong country.

Bing's answer was much shorter but also way more to the point and no lying.

On the other hand, when asking to write some function and then optimize it based on some criteria ChatGPT left Bing in the dust, it had managed to produce decent working code that I will not be a shamed to put into production while Bing offered some trash consisting mostly from a bunch of snippets and clues. No real value.
We are spending about 60% less. Workload has actually lessened since AWS is so much more stable. Getting to a similar DX as Heroku was quite the lift, but once it's done, it's done. These days we generally only have outages when we screw something up ourselves. I recommend https://github.com/aws/copilot-cli for starting out on ECS.
I'd say it's more likely that there will be at least slower rolling runs on smaller banks by large depositors. Keep in mind that the unlimited coverage only applies to the depositors of the two banks that were taken over, not all depositors everywhere. Keeping large balances in a bank that may not be deemed a systemic risk is still rolling the dice if said bank fails. (i.e. unless a bunch of other banks fail around the same time getting national attention, you'd probably be out of luck)
Sorry from the Docusaurus team.

It's taking a long time because there are edge cases to figure out if we don't want the upgrade to be painful for certain sites, notably the ones using anchor links or i18n. It's not far from the end so hopefully mdx2 will be merged soon.
It committed harakiri because it failed.
Personally Ive been coding long enough I’ve forgotten more than most junior people know. So I use ChatGPT to refresh my memory more than anything else. Like yesterday couldn’t remember how to open some ports on a Postgres server. ChatGPT gave me a 95% accurate answer and based on my own knowledge base I fixed the mistake. This took all of a few seconds. Whereas with normal web search it would take an order of magnitude longer and likely be not much more accurate.
“Plagiarizing our past to control our future” -Fran Blanche
union bosses want a cut, that's what "seat at the table" means. How much are the dues? I wonder what worker protections have been promised vs what's going to show up in an actual contract. Is bandcamp going to take the threat of a strike seriously?
fp-ts (and most functional libraries) have a handy Either type just for this: https://gcanti.github.io/fp-ts/modules/Either.ts.html
It's a lot easier to verify whether something is correct once you know what the thing is.

Half the time when I'm googling something I don't even know what subfield the term belongs to. I don't know what related terms I can use to narrow it down. Or I keep getting papers on a related but different question from what I'm trying to ask.

But if ChatGPT gives me an answer in context of a bunch of related terminology, it's so much easier to then plug those additional terms into Google and find a/the authoritative source.

For comparison, a lot of my (non-ChatGPT) initial searches will result in random blog entries or something that are often just flat-out wrong or else ignoring competing viewpoints. But they still might point me to better context and search terms.

The value of ChatGPT is that it gets you to information you can verify so much faster. But you still need to verify it the same way you need to verify stuff you find on blogs or Quora or Reddit or HN.
> I guess anything entertaining is off limits

I was just using your own words to show you the 2 quoted statements you made are in direct opposition to each other. They are all entertainment. That's all.
Idunno, beating Cyberpunk 2077 elicited more of an emotional reaction from me than anything TV or movies has done. Baldur's Gate, Anachronox, Oblivion, hell even the old final fantasy games had so much more going for them story-wise than pretty much anything Hollywood could come up with save for its most longest-running series.
Oh nothing catastrophic, they were just having a light outage yesterday.
I've seen "content note" proposed as an alternative.
I know almost nothing about React, let alone React hooks, but all this looks a little hack-etty, doesn't it?

Also, I'm curious if there is any similarity between these React hooks and the infamous Drupal hooks.
Don't trap me in a chat window
Disagree. The idea that there are different space time geometries for different quantum fields is an interesting and probably testable idea. I mean, yes, late night stoner shit, but next level.
This, exactly this. If my bank had collapsed and I had more than $250k in the bank we know the FDIC's answer would be "there is a limit of $250,000 for deposit insurance".
The original API when it was originally released was much saner. That was before JavaScript even had "classes" which meant React classes didn't have nearly as much boilerplate. After they migrated the API for React class components to be JavaScript classes it all went downhill. And then the functional people came and the rest is history.
What is "the app for Mac"? As i understand from other comments, it's not, in fact, on premise?
Oh, weary traveler, if yer tired of your APIs a changin' join us o'er at the Joystick [1] and enjoy a stable sea like y've never seen bafore.

[1] https://github.com/cheatcode/joystick
AIs are tools. The successful programmers will be the ones that can best use the tool towards their advantage. AIs can't function on their own. They need to be guided towards a solution for a human problem. That's where the new breed of programmers will succeed. You tell it what you want. It returns a result. Your job is to make sure it fills the need. I would even say that you are at the same level as everyone else since mediocre or award winning programmers are facing the same issue. Giving up because you think it will do your job and you don't have a role to play is not the answer.
Which OEM has the best software?

(I don't have a dog in this fight.)
This may also mean "someone who finds staff" aka a sourcer. The person in the article seems to be talking about the placement of others that were sourced through the program they were in.