skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s not that they had no assets it’s that they couldn’t liquidate them to pay out their depositors.

Sure, if everyone had just waited for the 10 year bonds to mature to access their funds their bank was in perfect shape.

—edit—

Assuming they could come up with enough money to pay the over market interest rates on deposits while also seeing their money flows reversing because of VC capital drying up.
Article about Brit Levy from Washington Post a bit over a month ago with some more context and info:

After layoffs, Meta, tech companies face uphill battle to boost diversity - https://wapo.st/3lmVr6w
You're not being gaslighted, rather you're being made aware that a five year old's naive and immature view of reality is insufficiently grounded in knowledge or nuance to be useful as a basis for adult discussions, much less science.

I'm guessing you're older than five, so you probably should adjust to the shock and make an attempt to advance your understanding of the world beyond the level of a child who can't even tie their shoes.
watching this doesn’t get any comments due to everyone being distracted by ai news is surreal

I mean, this is an adjacent topic yet the gravity of gpt4 and stuff completely sucks the air from here
And yet the sanest option for this, web components, keeps struggling.
Europe doesn’t send auditors to US companies to check GDPR compliance.
Hey, thanks for the suggestion! We have plans to further integrate the shell-context so that the AI can curate its answers even better. For example, letting the AI know that you're working in bash vs. fish so the commands it suggests respect syntax, etc.

Currently, you can share a Warp block with the AI, which will allow the AI to see both your command and the tail of your output. You can also right-click on any text selection and ask Warp AI -- this would also be a good place for us to attach the top-level command you're running (e.g. psql, gdb, vim) to the context. I'll note that down. Would that address your use-case?
He's a journalist now, therefore he does what journalists have always been incentivized to do: write clickbait articles. Amazon RTO is a hot topic, simple as that.
Flow still has some better sides:

* first class opaque type support

* exact object type

* correct variance, sound liskov oop

* no transpilation support (/*: */ and /*:: */) - so simple, so powerful; jsdoc ts doesn't compare, you can't import type star, when consuming libraries you have to increase maxNodeModuleJsDepth and other shenanigans; in flow you simply have access to all flow type language; why they don't want to do the same with ts is beyond me, it's like half a day of work to do it?

* nominal types for classes, structural for the rest - as it should be

* correct spread matching runtime behaviour

Flow is under active development. They recently completed ~2 years of work on local type inference which is a big deal. But dev team is not interested in external contributions - quite opposite to how ts development is done.

I did switch to ts as well but do miss above.
Try taking l-theanine in conjunction. About half as much theanine as caffeine. See: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480845/
Implying non caffeine users all met a clumsy untimely end before reaching that age?
I think you are vastly underestimating how Google Translate, Bing Translate and others compare to GPT-4: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35180715
C# is pretty much Java done right.

Speaking as someone who started with Java 1.2 and saw all the crap that happened to it.

C# is currently lightyears ahead of Java in every way, especially now that MS is not Micro$oft to people on the internet any more =)
I appreciate that you have an alternate opinion. I've gone through quite a few studies myself as well as other doctors say the contrary.

Rather than just "saying you're wrong, I'm wrong", can you the gold-standard studies you're claiming?

Also not sure what about the book is "pseudoscience", can you name specific aspects in that make it pseudoscience? (it actually doesn't recommend anything... so curious how it's pseudoscience)
>accessible

>pull-able

To any reasonable average person, these mean the same thing.
Are you implying it's not the same here? There are countless comments and posts that gets flagged almost instantly because it goes against the hivemind here. And no not because they are low quality or they miss the mark on some imaginary quality test.

I read HN through RSS and if you catch up say 1 or 2 days later you can see a lot of flagged or even straight up removed posts with a lot of comments and points too which means some people would actually find the content interesting or HN-worthy.
Because this is an offering that could easily be abused (crypto-mining, DDoS, bot farms). Requiring credit cards stops people from making many accounts.
Gonna go with "wearing a mask to stop particulate spread" is not separate but equal from taking horse dewormer. (And it's not an exaggeration to characterize it as such when they're literally buying drugs from farm suplly stores and injecting amounts meant for livestock over the course of a few days.)

Similarly, I don't know anyone who has died from wearing a mask.

This is not even to mention the numerous other studies, experiments, and demsonstartsions of all sorts of respiratory protective gear that show effectiveness against particulates smaller even than COVID-19.
Seems like an interesting way of doing it. Why generate the argument configuration from the documentation rather than generating the documentation from the argument configuration? Where there some pain points you wanted to solve from `getopt`, etc.?
You can tell even as a non-expert that the author has no clue about the academic landscape of AI.

Source: GPT-4
I am not sure I can agree.

Doctors and nurses now spend more time entering data than talking to patients.

Teachers now spend more time entering grades into online systems and fielding messages from parents.

Not sure how tech is helping or hurting plumbers except for the standard GPS tracking that bosses use to follow them around.
> Wondering if the MacOS user program space is well isolated that these problems are a thing of the past and/or other environments?

If by "past" you mean "1980s" and "other environments" you mean DOS, yes. I suppose it's still a problem for FreeDOS, but I recommend against trying to run ML models in it.
I do. But it is one of the situations that converge in a kind of mutually beneficial indifference. It is no different in spirit from that of a husband and wife who live under the same roof but seek intimacy elsewhere, or who have repressed their desires for so long that they no longer even remember how to make a baby.
The issue is is that all the big networks still own all the rights. Initially they sold them for cheap to vMVPDs but now the networks are charging more so YouTube fubo etc have to pay more leading to these price increases.
As per your first link, rate of infection with masks was 90% the rate of infection without masks. I mean, technically it "works" even if reduces the rates of infection by 0.0000001%. But most people are not going to see much benefit in masking if it only reduces the rate marginally.

The intensity of the push for masking was not at all matched by the effectiveness of masking. From most people's perspectives, if the rate of infection with masking is 90% the rate with no masking then masking doesn't work in layperson's terms.
I always wonder when reading essays like this, why do authors start them off with little stories meant to put down their readers. Why would you spin me the yarn of being this uncultured, self-absorbed modern man that can't be bothered to browse a bookshop's shelves unless some arcane signal penetrates all the way down through their dulled intellect. Even if I'd be that person, reminding me of it will make me go read through the rest in an adversarial way at best, or I'll make me stop reading it all together.
For those that have writer's block, I highly recommend listening or reading Steven Pressfield's talks about overcoming resistance.

Here's one of hist blog posts titled Is Writing Fun https://stevenpressfield.com/2010/05/is-writing-fun/
I hope someone good has picked up Kevin/antimatter15 by now. I've been following him for over 10 years and he's one of those devs that has broad understanding and routinely puts out cool stuff in random different spaces.
Monetary cost is one thing, but no parent can simply pull their kids out of school right now and expect them to have a decent transition to another school.

Rental contracts aren't typically reviewed each month, and in some places with high demand it's not possible to just find an apartment in a couple of weeks.

As Amazon frames their return to office, it's impossible to be met by some people.
Only in America! But seriously how is this not child abuse?
Not effectively in my experience. Even if I ask it for a discursive treatment in the style of William F. Buckley I always seem to get what reads like a transcript of Entertainment Tonight.
Thank you! We built a lightweight page on purpose (server-side rendered go templates), to never involve a big hosting cost. In fact, right now, it's hosted on a fly.io free tier. But it's open source and anybody could host it, if we're deciding to shut it down.
Try it on GPT-4, not Google or Bing Translate: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35180715
Not seeing where it says that classes aren't going to be supported anymore
Were the other 8 drums not missing?

While the video is good stuff, the Libya Review didn't even bother to write a story about it. But nyt did.[1]

[1] https://archive.ph/2jCda
I'm not sure if you're just waxing poetic or actually can't bring yourself to finish, but I'd highly recommend you do. As Calvino points out in "Why Read the Classics?" [0]

>Hence, whether we use the verb “read” or the verb “reread” is of little importance. Indeed, we may say:

>Every rereading of a classic is as much a voyage of discovery as the first reading.

> Every reading of a classic is in fact a rereading.
Definition 4 may be considered a corollary of this next one:

> A classic is a book that has never finished saying what it has to say.

[0] https://archive.is/aQdHv
> seems like a design choice intended to infantilize engineers and shelter them from reality

I think it's more charitable to assume that the designers are designing this for themselves and are just being aware of their own fallibility and limited mental capacity (we're only human after all), not seeking to infantilize or shelter some lesser class of programmers.
Yes, but that's not the point I was arguing with. Either it was made very clear (and people choose to overlook it despite it being hard to miss) or it was a subtle detail (that people easily missed, quite possibly unintentionally). Both can't be true at the same time.
Haven't used windows 11, but there were times when 999999999 was a valid cdkey and there were times when you had to activate the OS with Microsoft servers
I hate the word functional components, they aren't functional and it's a deprecated wording in react since the introduction of hooks.
If JD is so great, why do people complain about them and lobby for laws against the worst of their behavior?

If the Farm Bureau is so bad, why doesn't JD simply leave the US market, instead of corrupting that bureau to their own ends?

If you're playing a game, and you think the only moves available are "buy" or "don't buy", while your opponent uses a plethora of other moves, you will lose, and lose bad.
Looks like the AVG low in the Bay Area is about 45? I suppose that isn't that cold, however, in the event of an extended electrical outage, those with gas appliances can still heat their homes. Those without cannot. I think the merit of the parent comment still stands.

I live in New England and utilize heating oil primarily. Even that won't work without electricity.
Bandcamp Unionizes
I'll chime with my experience in embedded systems. In the last 2-3 companies I've worked with the directive has been "no GPLv3/LGPLv3, period. You will be fired if you ship with it." The legal departments just don't want to deal with it at all.
I think you and the one you're replying to are both very right.

Yes, more of this money is going, instead of middle-class workers, straight to the capital class who own the "machines" that do the work people used to do. Except instead of it being a factory that makes industrial machines owned by some wealthy industrialist, the machines are things like Google and AWS and the owners are the small number of people with significant stock holdings.

It's really striking though that a person graduating high school in say, 1970, could easily pick from a number of career choices even without doing college or even learning an in-demand trade, like plumbing, welding, etc. Factory work still existed and had a natural career progression that wasn't basically minimum wage, and the same went for retail. Sure, McDonalds burger flippers didn't expect then to own the restaurant in 10 years, but you could take lots of retail or clerical jobs, advance through hard work and support a family on those wages. Those are the days that are super gone and I totally agree with you both that something has changed for the worse for everyone who's not already wealthy.
> legitimate political spam

There's no such thing.
The project is not far from there, we are only weeks away before release.

BlindAI has been around for almost two years and is open source. We are improving on it with recent hardware and AI models, but this is not just communication stunt.

I apologize though for not providing as much as content as you would expect but we will do our best to provide something of value to the AI & privacy community ASAP.
Typescript in strict mode doesn't allow excess properties in an increasing number of situations. Typescript is still more structurally typed than nominally typed so there's no easy way to opt-in a specific type to stronger checks than average. The ergonomics are obviously different between Typescript and Flow. There are existing practical workarounds today to get more "nominally exact" types in Typescript such as using "brands" of various sorts (the most common is adding a private unique symbol to a type), though the ergonomics of using such branded types is also its own sort of awkward.
This is an easy way to lose your best workers
:) True. My first web development experiences were on AOL Hometown and reading people's 1337 scripts from dynamicdrive.com. DHTML! Updating PHP scripts over FTP! Shared hosting.

Oh right, you meant React wise... yeah...
That's a take.
Is it actually 100?
I‘d love to have a simple way of calling ReactDOM.renderToString() on my express server that does block to actually wait for API calls so that SSR‘ed HTML is populated. I am very willing to trade performance against simplicity here.

Besides some explorations for suspense and server components, there doesn’t seem to be any straightforward solution to that problem unfortunately
Because you have to write more code. If all you have is a single variable that gets updated with no complex logic then writing a reducer seems excessively boilerplatey.
Amazon, a company famous for poor treatment of employees, is treating employees poorly once again.

Shocked pickachu face
> explain general relativity for a 5 year old kid

General Relativity is the theory that explains how gravity works. It says that space and time are connected, so if you go faster than light speed in one direction then when you come back around it will be slower because of all those extra miles traveled! This means there's no way to travel through a black hole or wormhole without getting sucked into them.
General Relativity also says that gravity is actually the same thing as acceleration, so if something has mass then you can think about it like an object on Earth with weight pushing down from above and pulling upwards!
Why? Whats wrong?
imagine you're the one person on your team in a different location, driving to the office just to sit by yourself with non dedicated seating with no monitors/keyboard/mouse
I agree, it's disrespectful. I always give people the opportunity to speak with a human about the job before requiring they invest any time on an assignment. Seeing if someone has the skills to do the job is secondary to determining if the job is a fit in plain-english conversation.
>Is there something I should know about useEffectEvent vs useEvent?

Yea. It still proxies to the latest version, but it doesn't give you a stable function. (In fact, it always gives you a new one in DEV to avoid depending on its identity.) Instead, the _linter_ lets you (actually, forces you) to omit it from dependencies. Conceptually, it's a non-reactive piece of code. There's also a new limitation that you're supposed to only call it but not pass around (also enforced by the linter). There's a bunch of reasons for this design which we'll write up in the RFC. (TLDR: you only really know whether something should be reactive or not next to the actual callsite.)
The air needs to be pressurized so people can breathe normally. The most convenient way to do this is to use bleed air from the turbine compressors, but no-bleed systems (e.g., https://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/articles/qtr_...) are possible.
It's a user space process... it won't ever crash the kernel. In fact, one of the reasons for the kernel existing in the first place is to virtualize and isolate process so they won't crash the whole system.
When I was 17 I interpreted the song Zero Sum by Nine Inch Nails to be about the danger of global thermonuclear war along with global warming; it's interesting to go back in 2023 and re-evaluate it as being about humans destroyed not physically but rendered irrelevant because of AI. Curious to hear your thoughts.
Yes, it can be tricky, and sometimes I too catch myself asking, "why is it designed like it is" with regards to hooks, I won't lie. But, there is something there that makes it attractive to me where it was off-putting before. Alone as a complement to more extensive state management libraries, or other tools intended for larger scale apps, it serves as a nice middle-ground solution. You can build your own bits of logic in quite an accessible way now too. In other words, for me personally I feel that there is something distinct and interesting going on here.

Finally, if you combine it with the fact that it seems to hold on as the industry standard for jobs, and being useful for native mobile development via React Native, it all comes together nicely in my mind. With its huge ecosystem and closeness to plain vanilla JS, I guess it just makes me simply a bit of a better developer and gives me a new perspective on things. That's that.
A lot of these cheap, portable sensors "cheat" in one way or another. E.g CO2 sensors that assume they'll be subject to open air once every few days, using that minimal CO2 value as a baseline. So while they give numbers which can be useful if the user is aware of its limitations, they're far from being analytical tools.

In contrast PM is pretty easy to get right. Shine laser, count particles.
> All employee surveys are corporate theater.

There's a theatrical aspect, but I assure you many companies take the surveys seriously; they just don't treat them like a "vote" in the way many people seem to expect.

From management's perspective the surveys are trying to read the temperature of company and figure out:

1. Are there unexpected sources of pain?

2. Approximately how bad will the pain be for new policies?

If some process intended (and thought) to be lightweight and cheap is called out as expensive and a major source of pain, management will probably take action.

For something like ending remote work, the question is "Exactly how badly will enforcing this policy hurt us? Do we want to make that tradeoff" my guess is that if 99.9% of the company had sad Remote work was non-negotiable to them we wouldn't be reading this headline.
A forced air gas furnace doesn't work without electricity.
I see the segfault in one of the prompt as well.

> write a typescript program that read a text file and print to the screen

const inputFile = './input.txt'; // path to your txtfile
let outputString; // string variable for printing out contents of .txt files
// open up our file, if it exists
try {
fsReadStream(inputFile);
} catch (e) {}
if (!!errno) throw errnoError(); /* Throw an error on ENOENT */ // if the inputfile does not exist
// read in contents of file and print out to screen [1] 51232 segmentation fault ./chat
> you also don't have the horizontal velocity of an aircraft to provide additional dynamic pressure at the critical pitch-up first turn phase of flight

Isn't one of the (few) advantages of balloon launch that this critical pitch-up maneuver is far less dramatic? At launch the rocket can already be oriented mostly vertical instead of mostly horizontal.

Of course this has the attendant disadvantage that your rocket starts with less kinetic energy.
Because we require major systemic changes. That's not going to happen if we require everyone to choosing to do the right thing right now.

Also, IMO, the changes need to happen at a governmental and corporate level. Individual people - which is where I was imagining you were thinking about when referring to incentives* - make a much smaller difference to AGW.

*was I wrong about that?

What incentive structures do you see working in this context?
Oh, sorry, classic HN US-centrism (though TBF, Amazon is primarily a US company).

Sure, in Canada it maybe different.
She mentions other employees experiencing the same. Perhaps this is the first whistleblower who will pave the way for more corroborating with their own respective stories.
> Is this a feedback loop? We keep increasing caffeine content because we need more for our beverages to have the desired effect for customers?

Tolerance, or physical addiction is exactly that. A given dose is less effective after a certain amount of repeated use and a larger dose is required for the same effect. Not using the drug at all may cause withdrawal symptoms.
The newer versions of Camera Link don't need the clock lane, FPD Link-II and above or Channel Link-II and above.
Can you be a bit more specific about which issues you've ran into? That would help me know whether we're addressing them or not. (The linked issue is very broad so it's not super clear which part of it you're referring to. We think it conflates a few unrelated things.)

I think it's fair criticism we've been slow on shipping this Hook. We try to take a very cautious approach to introducing new APIs, so we are currently testing it in our internal codebase. Once we feel confident the approach makes sense, we will make a stable release with it.
I would second that. Even the best prompt engineers could not do the mental gymnastics to read, comprehend and change the generated code. We are a long way from replacing programmers.
Valve and Ikea are doing great and I know of a bunch of companies that had successful IPOs that are now defunct.

Your comment is quite silly. No one can predict the future with certainty.
University, jobs, candidates are bureaucratic constructs; an AI sufficiently powerful to run the entire bureaucracy doesn't need to be employed towards the end of enforcing and reproducing those social relations. It can simply allocate labor against needs directly.
That would be irrational. It’s a Prisoner’s Dilemma and no matter what any individual would prefer to do the only rational move is to assume others will betray you. I don’t think it’s fair to ask SV to behave irrationally.
C# doesn't have algebraic data types and pattern matching though, right? I'm not the same person, but at least for me that's one of the big advantages of Rust, and it's one of those features that outside of Rust you only really find in ML-family languages. I know it's possible to simulate it partially using sealed classes in some languages, but that's always seemed like a lot of boilerplate in comparison.