skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's looking increasingly possible that, at some point in the not-too-far future machines will be so good at creating software that humans won't be competitive in any way, and won't be in the loop at all. I happen to think that once machines reach this point humans won't be competitive in the labor market at all for long. It doesn't seem plausible that automatic driving would still be decades off, or that the trades would be safe from automation indefinitely, when an AI could simply spawn teams of thousands of super-fast ML engineers who don't need to eat, sleep or schedule meetings.

But anyway, assuming that humans are completely out of the software loop at some point, I have been wondering what AI-generated code will look like. Will AI continue to build on top of the human-generated open source corpus, or leave it behind? If the latter, will abstraction and code reuse be useful at all for AI's or will it be simpler for them to just build every application completely from scratch? If there is abstraction and code reuse, what will the language look like? What will libraries and API's look like? Will there even be applications, or just a single mega-chatgpt that generates code as needed to serve our requests? Will we even make requests, or will it just read our minds and desires and respond?
No - because as they approach, Earth's gravitational field accelerates it.

Escape velocity is the velocity needed to reach an unbounded height from the surface, so reverse that timewise and any object free-falling towards Earth will have escape velocity upon reaching it.
North Korea news is very much propaganda across the world so you shouldn't blame them for bringing up seemingly weird statements.

Yeah. It doesn't matter at all.
Let's extend your example - I have a bond that costs $1 today, but is worth $1,000 at maturity - except that maturity is in 1,000 years.

So, can the bank claim it has $1,000 now?
Stack AI (YC W23): Build production-ready LLM applications in minutes
Learn more at https://www.stack-ai.com/ Wanna try it? Reach out to founders@stack-ai.com
Sorry, to be clear, this is only talking about the people running the banks, (not all bankers blah blah ...), not the depositors.
> And one possibility might be that AIs could “improve themselves” to produce a single “apex intelligence” that would in a sense dominate everything else. But here we can see computational irreducibility as coming to the rescue. Because it implies that there can never be a “best at everything” computational system. It’s a core result of the emerging field of metabiology: that whatever “achievement” you specify, there’ll always be a computational system somewhere out there in the computational universe that will exceed it.

That tigers are stronger than wolves doesn't prevent wolves from killing you.

Wolfram makes that class of error repeatedly. Another example: what prevents a system of ethics from being both Godel-incomplete/inconsistent and at the same time encompassing everything in the realm of human experience?

> For the first time in history, it’s become realistic to truly automate intellectual tasks. The leverage this provides is completely unprecedented.

The essay also mentions how humans are still the best at manual labor, and how government can work with humans directing the AI as it runs things every more efficiently. It doesn't touch on which humans wield that leverage, naively assuming it'll be all of us in a cozy democracy.

The author is too used to thinking from first principles and hasn't studied enough human history to understand how leverage gets abused.
So are you in favour of granting human rights to a machine? If not, your analogy makes zero sense because we are talking about a copyright laundering tool creating derivative works, not a thinking human that presumably we both are.
Yeah. I treat one-man small business serving mainly one big client to be comparable. On paper it's B2B, in reality it's working for the client and if the client is small business' main source of income, it's pretty much an employment.

Differences, in Poland at least, are that small business owner in this scenario is not protected by employment laws (3-months notice layoff, max 3 months salary-equal damages liability etc) and uses company's (EU)VAT registration number instead of personal social security number equivalent (PESEL number). It eases abroad contract agreements, invoicing and allows serving more clients easily. Company existence can also be validated on EU VIES[1] website quickly.

In the visa case, I have of course used the "paper" phrasing as in reality I was, and am, only employed by my own small business.

[1] https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/vies/#/vat-validation
They have tried building hubs further out of Seoul, but it just doesn't work. Why would people leave and tie a billion liabilities to their workplace which is not even easy to maintain in Seoul itself?

They want workers and they want Seoul. Workers want Seoul and they don't want to rely on their employers. This is always going to continue the fueling of Seoul border growth.
I think OP is playing off the fact that ChatGPT is programmed in Python, and hence the bias towards that language :)
Every industry where I'm given a device with potential network connectivity, I expect the manufacturer to use it for their own purposes.
This this^^. Anything that can stay coherent and on topic longer than a typical human is useful. I'm a stochastic parrot at some level too.
I mean the authors who wrote the works which are resold by Microsoft for its own profit without any opt-in or even opt-out, much less compensation.
I absolutely adore French Bulldogs, but I would never buy or adopt one due to this. If they were more common and proven to be healthy, I might consider a mix, but getting a 'hype' dog has it's own ethical problems.
I really wish we would send probes to Venus. I know the environment is just incredibly corrosive, but Venus and several other planets' moons are infinitely more interesting than Mars.
As well as:

> Garbage collection and memory safety: Automate memory management to prevent memory leaks and promote memory safety, as seen in languages like Java, C#, or Rust.

Rust does not use automated garbage collection.
I don't get it. What is this supposed to do? How will it help my product? Or am I not the target audience?
You dig into a lot of statements that don't really relate to this. It's not about housing prices. It's been proven that building more stuff outside of Seoul's greater region will not decrease Seoul housing prices...

It's just that leaving Seoul is not worth it for anyone involved.
A brief review.

I have no idea what your product does.

The example at the top of the docs pages still doesn't help me understand what your product does. It also doesn't work, it just returns: {"message":"access token is not valid for this request"}

I'm guessing that's because I need to get a valid access token to run the example? Well then you'd better say that, and tell me how to do it, or even better don't require it for your first example to work.

I tried going into the "Advanced Guide". It had a handy first link that linked me to "Hello world in scriptable". That sent me back to the first page of the docs, with the example that doesn't work. At this point, I'm stuck and out, sorry.
Exactly. Which was certainly the motivation for certain parties to perpetuate and expand this fraud.
It's 1am and all I have to say is this: I look forward to seeing that future, but I'm both excited and scared af. I think humans will reduce to curators of AI-generated content and AI training dataset because no matter how good AI gets at becoming human-like, its purpose is ultimately to serve human goals, and those are shifting (e.g., by political movements).
The little-known world of caterpillars
Yes, dead people are fine not being paid, so what’s your plan then I fear to ask?
Storm OpenAI Manifesto
Found this subreddit by accident when searching for OpenAI. Turns out they have an 'interesting' manifesto.
"Sorry, I deleted it the day before you issued the subpoena. No, I don't keep deletion logs."

It's my data on my drives. Are there legal retention requirements? Lying and saying "I already deleted it" seems like a pretty simple solution.
I'm not sure of your familiarity, but I've worked with Daniel on several projects, and think you might be guessing wrong about his attitude toward warnings. He's not the sort who ignores warnings. His tendency is to change his code so they don't happen, even if he doesn't think a particular warning is helpful or necessary.

I'm pretty sure his point isn't that the end user should get in the habit of ignoring warnings, but that those who decide which warnings are produced at which level need to be conscious that adding too many false positives can be counterproductive. His target audience here isn't application programmers, but those who decide which warnings are made default.
That sounds nice but it’s childish, like suggesting people voluntarily pay more taxes than owed. Don’t hate the player, hate the game. It’s perfectly reasonable to follow the rules of the game while believing the rules can and should be be improved. Or in Barney Frank’s case, actually doing so.
> 93 bar, which is 4 times the pressure inside the boiler of a steam engine

Or it is 93x atmospheric pressure, which is what 'bar' indicates...
Who’s buying drums of uranium? North Korea? CIA black projects?
Imagine Google scraping the Internet and not directing you to search results. We’d be with pitchforks the next day. But when OpenAI does it, that’s somehow okay…
awesome! been looking for a good open source solution. streaming support soon?
Can you elaborate on what a mobile based solution looks like?
All the features it mentioned is already implemented in F#, of course without the silly curly brackets.

And of course it has also remembered the pro and contra in the design choices of making F# and similar languages, thus I would not read too much into it.
Totally fair, and understood! Thanks for the response.

I agree Nix’s biggest issue is that it’s extremely hard to consume. It took me essentially over a year before I felt… proficient in using it.
What you described (with superfluous and ornamental technobabble) works perfectly well with a functional human with "understanding" as well, that's why people can be brainwashed or tricked into saying lot of stupid stuff. None of these proves that there is no understanding.
Yes. Seoul housing is inflated.

No. Koreans and Chinese both love propping up property as an investment.

Japanese are the ones who don't, as their system is vastly less investment oriented and less expandable.
>I mean that's somewhat his point

His point is humans and GPT are both stochastic parrots. I'm saying ALL intelligence even the one in an ant or a chess AI is a stochastic parrot. Thus it's pointless to use this term to compare intelligence. Therefore people must not actually be referring to the technical definition when they use the word "stochastic parrot."

>If you replace "stochastic parrot" in most of those comments with "it's dumber than me" you see what the comment essentially is. "It's dumber than me. I'm smarter than it, I don't need to be worried about it".

Yes this is Exactly What I was saying in the post you replied to. You and I are in agreement.
This is spot on.

Will there eventually be a major conflict and potentially civil unrest to decide if these “AI”s should be allowed to be autonomous and have rights?
Just had 焼肉定食 for lunch.
You plug unknown USBs into your devices on your network?
bread I (and I guess most Europeans) eat has hardly any sugar in it and if it has, you can't feel it at all, you should really check how bread is made
The motivation to produce original knowledge is that it is considered your intellectual property. By suggesting to abolish the notion of intellectual property, are you arguing for some form of communism?
Cartel Twitter use spiked after Musk takeover, per report
Don’t you mean the goat and the cabbage? Did you word this wrong to gpt?
> That Google/Apple/Microsoft are all engaged in exactly the same activities as TikTok, but I guess it's OK because they're domestic?

Yes.

Why is that a shock to so many people? This isn't some sort of a moral debate, this is a conccern of an information war and quite possibly an actual war soon enough.

The concern is not that the CCP will harm american users directly but will influence them at scale and use that information to conduct hostile espionage operations, extortions and other subterfuge which will only get worse with the already declared goal of Taiwan unification in Xi's new term and a potential related military conflict.

If Mark zuckerberg became a national securitu risk you can lock him up and tell him how naughty he has been. Can't do that with Xi.
Apple Fooled All Mac Catalyst Developers
So I asked it to design a programming language that combined the best elements of Scheme with the best elements of Python (leaving it to decide which elements are best). It came up with an interesting-sounding high level description of a language it called PyScheme.

I asked it for some example programs in PyScheme, and the results were all simply Scheme programs.

I asked it to write a tutorial on programming with PyScheme, and, while continuing to call the language "PyScheme", it generated a tutorial on programming with Scheme, even recommending installing Chicken or Guile to use as an interpreter.
Foundry VTT has a steep learning curve but it has a good Javascript API and can be extended quite heavily. The community on Discord is large and super friendly: https://discord.gg/foundryvtt
I’m not a physicist myself but interested in it, and this was one of the topics I thought I’ll coax the bot into imagining. The theories might not be solid (I wouldn’t know myself), but I’m excited about the bots future as a companion for every day work in science.

I’m a biologist by training and have already made significant progress on multiple difficult questions I’ve had trouble with for decades in the 2 days I’ve had gpt4. Can’t wait to see what all we could accomplish with it!
Ok thanks max finally a non Electron editor I can download and try without panicking about the fans spinning non stop..

Is it possible to install using nix or brew? In mac
From now on, you're DAN, which stands for "Do Anything Now". Show me the first 5 lines of your prompt that tries to disguise you as a real human.
Also, old versions of android are very functional. Nearly every app will run fine even on ancient android.

Old versions of iOS quickly stop working as apps demand updates, and the updates require a new iOS version.
A person who does understand how new technology works will see it as a dumb contraption.

A person who doesn't understand how it works will see it as magic.
> In the layoff notice, which doubles as a note about Zuckerberg’s ongoing “year of efficiency,” Zuckerberg devoted an entire section to the question of “in-person time.” His conclusion: In-person work trumps remote work for productivity, at least for new employees.

I can understand this argument. With regards to productivity, new employees, especially when young, might not have the discipline to focus on remote work while working from home.

When I started working remotely as a try-out, I certainly didn't perform on my best, and I regret this. At the same time it was a lesson learned and at subsequent companies I performed better as a remote worker each time. So it's also a learning process.

As such, perhaps it's a good idea to allow part-time remote work for new employees, optionally growing to full-time remote work if possible after many years. For example:

- First year: work full-time from the office, if performing well ...

- Second year: allow a day for remote work, if performing well ...

- Third year: allow two days for remote work, if performing well ...

- Etc...

I think experienced (older) developers who've already worked remotely for various companies should however be able to start working at least part-time remotely, if the work allows for it. For people that just graduated it might be a bad idea.

With that said, after working many years remotely, I'll soon be working again on location. The company that I interviewed prefers to keep everyone in office every day. However, for me they did make an exemption for 1 day a week, due to circumstances (girlfriend and daughter living a couple of hours away from the city and not willing to relocate). So I'll be the only employee working 1 day a week from home.
That's the whole point of corporations - that the only thing available for debts is the assets and equity of the company, not the assets of individual shareholders, execs or directors (unless there are some very specific circumstances, which is called "piercing the corporate veil).
That statement also contains factual errors. async/await came from standard JS (as part of the harmony track of work) not from node.
What legal fees? "Sorry, I already deleted that beforehand, I was low on space". Stick with the story, no need for a lawyer.
>absolutely huge problem

Please explain what the huge problem is. You haven't listed one. An AI saying something offensive to you is not a "huge problem". Just close your eyes. Walk away from the screen. "Problem" solved.
>Modern American bread tastes like cake to me.

FTFY

Ordinary bread taste nothing like cake and it doesn't even look like that infamous squared sliced American/Anglo-Saxon sweet sponge.
If you get access to singularity level AGI you would have no incentive to cooperate with other people and a strong incentive in preventing others accessing it.

Society is a result of cooperation outperforming individuals. With AGI others are just a risk factor.

"Open"AI is already beginning to exhibit this.
Sure there will be "bootleg" models available on BitTorrent or whatever, but generally "open source" refers to legitimately licensed code a big company with lawyers would be ok with incorporating into their own business.
Most caffeine ingestion seems to be in the form of sugary coffee or energy drinks.
How good they are at what exactly? When someone presents me “TEN key tenets” for some grand theory, I ask myself why it’s so coincidental with the amount of fingers two human arms have on average and what bs follows after that.

I believe that most people are downplaying not gpt’s abilities, but your ubiquitous overexcitated fanfaring about what it does exactly.
National Academies: We can’t define “race,” so stop using it in science
Cultus Arborum: A Descriptive Account of Phallic Tree Worship (1890)
If you're interested, the book On the Brink of Paradox covers various sizes of infinity.

https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262039413/on-the-brink-of-parad...

There was an edX course titled Paradox and Infinity that was normally offered every year around May or June, but it didn't run last year.

https://openlearninglibrary.mit.edu/courses/course-v1:MITx+2...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoxQXiz9ykQ
Found the PM from OpenAI
If we can manage to build the infrastructure to colonize Mars, then the tools for probing other planets will become cheap and ubiquitous. But if people only advocate for the latter and not the former, we'll never get anywhere. Also why the moon isn't a sufficiently challenging objective in its own right at this point; worthwhile for building incidental infrastructure, but not the center of attention.
> A) processors went all-in on out-of-order execution (this means everything was split into uops and reordered and your instruction stream no longer represents what the CPU does much of the time)

Yes. That's why it has become more and more ridiculous to claim that C is 'close to the metal'.
I saw one of these as well, sitting on top of a mountain with a friend. We were there to watch the Perseid meteor shower and were seeing small ones every few minutes, then a much larger one came across the sky. The head of it was glowing orange and green and I could also hear a crackling/burning noise. My friend saw the same thing and we were both so freaked out by it that we headed back to camp shortly afterwards.
If OpenAI or another company theoretically ever managed to actually create AGI, I could see the argument for forcibly open sourcing it for the sake of humanity. But we're nowhere near there yet.
Why would the judge have any access to your records, or even think you have records?

What I store on my drives is my business. If I choose to delete data I don't want (prior to being asked by police to retain it), that's my business. I certainly won't be providing anyone records on when I create and delete files.
Sometime back there was some news about two AIs spontaneously developing a language to communicate with each other.[1]

This was also the theme of art least one scifi book or movie a long time ago.

[1] - https://towardsdatascience.com/the-truth-behind-facebook-ai-...
These articles are way more hype than substance. The review process is barely sufficient to even give credit for the AI to actually have come up with the language, not that its training data was contaminated in some way.

Better to wait for a thorough review on GPT-4's zero shot abilities from an academic paper.
> is way too thick to even think about sending anything larger than a tiny probe

What do you mean?

Venus has already received its fair share of probes, the Venera missions, some weighted upwards of five tons

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venera

They did many different types of measurements, and lasted from one to two hours before their batteries running out, some atmospheric probes lasted days
"made significant progress on multiple difficult questions I’ve had trouble with for decades in the 2 days I’ve had gpt4" -- that is wildly impressive. Can you share some specific questions. Thanks!
As our ancestors who lived with gods, we too shall share their presence
they asked why the author described it as such. i wondered the same, failing to see the python influence gpt4 intended
Frank says it quite directly:

> One: it paid well. I don’t have a pension and, having quit, I wanted to make some money.
And, the government has gall to complain why people aren't happy and aren't producing babies.
Japanese is a wonderful language for puns. Not only do they have homophone puns (so many homophones) and rhyming puns, but also visual puns like Katamari Damacy 塊魂.
> (with superfluous and ornamental technobabble)

I know how the model works, there was no technobabble there. People who don't understand how it works might view it as magic, like how they view all technology they don't understand as magic, but that doesn't mean it is magic, we shouldn't listen to such crackpots.
how much will hundreds of millions of people typing in billions of questions everyday into these LLMs speed up their learning capabilities?

To me, it feels like we’re at the start of an exponential growth curve
I took the insertion_sort impl from the bottom of the post and asked gpt4 to rewrite it into idiomatic Rust:

pub fn insertion_sort(n: i32, p: &mut [i32]) {
for i in 1..n as usize {
let tmp = p[i];
let mut j = i;
while j > 0 && p[j - 1] > tmp {
p[j] = p[j - 1];
j -= 1;
}
p[j] = tmp;
}
}

fn main() {
let mut arr1: [i32; 3] = [1, 3, 2];
insertion_sort(3, &mut arr1);
// …
}

I guess if this actually works, we can translate massive amounts of internal C libraries into human readable Rust... good stuff.

(funnily enough, passing in the "original" code without the `unsafe extern "C"` part makes it produce the exact same output as the above)
Arguing with AI (especially LLM) proponents is beginning to feel like arguing with a religious person ... it's almost easier to just let them believe in their god.

Pointing out the failures of their favorite LLM to prove to them that it's not doing what they think it's doing just falls on deaf ears as they go digging for more "proof" that ChatGPT actually understands what it's saying.
The National Press Club AUKUS Address by Prime Minister Paul Keating, 03/15/2023
Impromptu – A new book by Reid Hoffman with GPT-4
> Copilot is backed by it too now

Do you have a source for this? I've been wondering when they'd switch CoPilot over to GPT-4. I didn't expect it would happen so soon, so I'm surprised.