skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
How are you getting such good results? Here's what I get, all with llama-cpp and 4 bit quantization:

Here is LLaMA 7B, 4 bits quantized:
"us presidents in chronological order: george washington,john adams, james madison, james monroe, john quincy adams, john q. adams,.
Democratic Party (1824-present) - The Democratic party is a political organization that has supported the common man since 1790s America. Its basic principles are democracy and equality of opportunity for all citizens regardless their race or sex; its opponents, however called it "the party fo the rich" because they were the first to defend slave trade from abolitionists' attacks..
George Washington | Constitutional Convention (1789-present) - George washington: presidential timeline.
US Presidents In Chronological Order"

Here is LLaMA 13B, 4 bits quantized
"us presidents in chronological order: george washington,john adams, james madison, james monroe, john quincy adams, andrew jackson. us presidents in alphabetical orer: abraham lincoln,andrew johnsoin, franklin piercejulias clay, william harrison, benjamin hungton,zachary taylor, marton van buren, warren g harding, woodrow wilson, and george w bush.
John Adams was the second president of america he is known to be a founding father as well his work in politics includes being involved with declaration of independence ,aswell serving on continental congress from 1785-1794"

Here is LLaMA 30B, 4 bits quantized:
"us presidents in chronological order: george washington,john adams, james madison, james monroe, john quincy adams,andrew jackson and martin van buren.
The presidents were George Washington (1789-1796), John Adams(1796- 2005), Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809) James Madison(1809 -1813). The next US president to die in office was Zachary Taylor. He served from March, 4th ,1849 till July 9 th of the same year .
The first President to be assassinated (shot and killed by another) is John F Kennedy who died"

Here is LLaMA 65B, 4 bits quantized:
"us presidents in chronological order: george washington,john adams, james madison, james monroe, john quincy adams, andrew jackson.
what are the names of those presidents?! [end of text]"

For all of these I have the following: "sampling parameters: temp = 0.800000, top_k = 40, top_p = 0.950000, repeat_last_n = 64, repeat_penalty = 1.300000".

This is using the "naive" 4-bit quantization that llama-cpp is doing, not anything sophisticated like GPTQ.

This is all using llama.cpp as written in this article: https://til.simonwillison.net/llms/llama-7b-m2
The innovation economy–a reason to be optimistic(By Greg becker of SVB, 2022)
Creating global solutions that beget great economic opportunities requires a higher purpose
Openai changed it course.

Time for rebranding!

ClosedAI? MicrosoftAI? What do you think it should be?
Anti-aging?? This guy wants people to not suffer from their bodies getting old and failing, leaving them to suffer and eventually causing them an unavoidable death? What a freeking monster!
It was very impressive for an org the size of Microsoft to pivot as quickly as they did.
IMHO and IME, it's never the product of critical thinking. It's an emotional reaction, not thinking and especially not thinking critically.
Hmm I don’t know. I don’t like scared as an emotion here, and i think this reply is mildly fear-mongering. Be skeptical, be discerning, be cautious- especially when putting something in your body.

That said, there’s really few cases of cannabis use going poorly, especially in the context of other drugs (alcohol, tobacco) and their documented harm. I’m not a doctor, I’m not a lawyer, etc so do your own research, but it is most likely a safe activity at a “normal” dosage for the average person.

> If you really want to do it, try low grade edibles; do it in the presence of a friend so they can get you medical help if you need it. Only a small number of people will have a problem, but don’t take stupid chances with your body and mind, people.

I do agree with this. Edibles are good because you don’t have to smoke, but bad because the affects can take upwards of 2Hr to hit. it can be hard to dose and many people get impatient and take more and then they don’t enjoy the sensation. There’s almost no documented case of overdosing especially in the context of amounts someone might buy, so that’s not likely a concern, but just having a bad time is likely. Do it with friends - it’s also more fun that way. Most people don’t turn 21 and start drinking alone, so don’t do this alone either. Establishing a sober medical monitor type relationship for taking a small edible is a bit extreme but don’t be alone.
Maybe this already exists somewhere and I don't know about it ...

Anyway, when working on feature branches I wanted a quick way to switch to master, pull, switch back and finally rebase.

So I made a little script (https://gist.github.com/lelanthran/6c9bd1125f89e7621364878d1...) that pushes the current branch name onto a stack before switching to a new branch, and allows me to switch back to the topmost branch on the stack.

xgit master # Switch to master from current <really long branchname>
git pull
xgit pop # Switches back to <really long branchname>
git rebase master

I use this now very frequently; when I need to switch to branches I use `xgit <branch>`, because then I can switch back easily using `xgit pop`.
Sounds a little like funnel web spider venom - just an evolutionary accident it's so potent to humans, at no evolutionary drawback for its main role.
Microsoft Subsystem for AI.
Or the VC companies that lent the money would pool resources and have one person handle a few smaller businesses using similar procedures to mitigate risk. Helping manage growth is part of what these companies are supposed to do and you'd think it would protect the investment (in a world where you thought the limit was actually $250k).

Oddly though, a thing I've heard repeated over and over is "it was in our covenant to use only SVC."
I think it was the first thing they'd killed which had been around for quite a while, still had devoted users, and Google didn't offer a replacement. If you look at the graveyard, the pre-Reader things they killed were things which had flopped (e.g. Buzz), things which were no longer relevant (e.g Gears), acquisitions, and mergers where they had two redundant products (e.g. Google Video).
the more you read into this story of SVB, the more it seems like it (and other banks?) are nothing more than a ponzi scheme where they take customer's money, reinvest it in risky business, and then use the new customers money to back the people requesting withdrawals from the bank. Is this true?
I believe free speech is far from absolute and America has lots of legal avenues for gag orders from courts.
TFA claims GPT-2 isn't open. Is it that the trained weights are open but the project that did the training isn't?
Nederlands has not so great weather. If you're used to the West Coast and like to cycle, try Girona. A bit more wet though. Pay is obviously a lot lower than you may be used to.
I think to many neovim users, the term is absolutely synonymous. I don’t know anyone that prefers the feature set of vim to neovim at this point. The benefit of vim/vi is that you will probably have it on most unix systems by default.

This comment will probably be a bat signal for vim users though.
I dont follow. If youre already bank CEO then you’ve already “made it” in the sense of having a career that’s paid you tens of millions of dollars.

Why not just be prudent and keep making money rather than gambling it all on red?
Was the hotel in NZ? And do you work on a three headed beast?
>I meant more the fact that even at least one of the pro sports leagues tries to remind even people who are doing extremely well in the sport, that as well as they've done, that next step as a player is going to be even harder. So to not neglect things in single-minded pursuit of "I'm going to the NBA" (because you're probably not).

Sure, but the next step of going from drama school to a professional actor is also extremely hard. There may not be a central authority like the NBA directly stating that to college kids, but most people won't be able to make that transition either.
One reason why Microsoft was able to execute so fast was that they had nothing to lose in doing so. The entirety of the Bing product and brand is mostly immaterial to the company's bottom line. What better way to try and revitalize it than by taking a huge leap with some hot new tech that is capturing the public imagination? If that leap is successful, you get to open up a huge new line of business and challenge Google. If not, well it just...goes back to being Bing.

For Google – whose entire business is tied up in that one search box – it is a very different equation. Any reduction of consumer confidence in their search engine is an existential threat to the company. Changes have to be rolled out slowly and with an immense amount of deliberation and testing.

Microsoft would be stuck in the same dilemma if, say, someone came up up with a futuristic-looking disruption in the spreadsheet space and Google Sheets was quick to adapt to it.
Address Not Found for http://erland.sh. Same with https.
> "That was a throwaway example I gave no thought"

That's the bit I'm objecting to. Your comment had one (1) thing in it, that thing had no thought behind it, and it was smug "haha can't wait for this OBVIOUS FAILURE MODE, morons" dismissal and it was wrong, a failure mode the tech already doesn't fall for.

> "Are you seriously suggesting there is no way to trick a hypothetical MortgageGPT"

Are you seriously suggesting that people who would approve million dollar mortgage loans of their money week in, week out, wouldn't think about or protect against trivial tricks?
There is of course a difference between holding assets with a subjective (potentially bubble) valuation and holding a long dated treasury.

With the treasury, there is a very liquid and transparent market and you will almost certainly get all of the money back on a specific date. You just have to wait long enough.
FedCoin is known as US Dollar. Why does it need to be called coin or be mined?
TikTok enters the search ad market
First Republic secures new facility from JPMorgan
Ugit (undo git): https://github.com/Bhupesh-V/ugit/blob/master/ugit

I got this idea from a Twitter discussion which eventually blew up a year later after its initial release.
How’s that work? Did the stockholders get back the excess returns?
I've been told by numerous people, and ChatGPT apparently, that the way to minimize your risk at a bank is to only deposit a maximum of $250K into each bank, and use different banks with 250K at each bank, to ensure that FDIC will cover each person at each bank for that limit maximum of 250k.
Re: Mac — Hammerspoon?
It may not be 'Open' in sense of open-source or free, but it is open that I can access it and use it in my projects. Before this companies like Google/Facebook had such models but closed in sense that we can get some papers and blog posts but can't rely on them to build our startup.

Because of financial and people resources required, availability of data etc. rest always stayed. Now I can use ChatGPT, Gpt-3/4, Whisper etc. at a reasonable cost and it is forcing rest of the industry to also "Open" up.
That’s essentially what I’m saying, except that I’m explaining why they bought 10 year bills in the first place instead of shorter and more liquid ones.

Forget the numbers.

The long term ones are advantageous on their books because they cost less to purchase than short term ones but still record at the full HTM value.

With stable and low demand on withdrawals, using that HTM value isn’t unreasonable since the bills are sure to mature and so the difference of cost between short and long term bills means their books look better for less. There’s predictable risk to the play, but they probably needed the extra bit of wiggle room on their balance sheet and felt it should be fine as long as interest rates stay low and deposits don’t pick up.

But of course neither of those was going to hold. And so (as you noted) their bills grossly devalued and their account holders changed borrowing and withdrawl patterns as the economy shifted. Both factors built into the risk fell through and they went from probably-marginal to downright-damned.
> There are plenty of necessary reasons for business to have money in accounts above $250k

Sure, and they know what's insured and accept those risks.

> There should be no exposure here

Bullshit. There's a gradient here: There are some depositors who have $750k and others who have many millions. What many of them (the latter group) were doing here is simply bad financial practice. I have to do better with my personal finances. Why don't they, too? Because more people depend on them? That's pathetic, they should do better because people depend on them.

And let's not pretend like they don't have options. They do. The individuals (corporate officers) losing money here (hypothetically, since they're going to be made whole) are supposed to be competent leaders. They're showing the world their asses.
I completely agree with this world without men for women.

I also advocate a world without women for men.

Not sure about South Korea, but in the USA, there's no benefit for a man to marry a woman, either. I've long advocated for men not to get married. The number of friends I've had go to absolute poverty because of a divorce is incredible. Living in their cars, lose their kids except for 4 days a month (every other weekend).

But in the world without men, they women should probably move to an uninhabited land and start their own cities, put in pipelines, sewers, open auto repair shops, start construction companies, create and pave roads, build homes and highrise buildings, electricians - all that stuff that men traditionally do for women. Only 2-4% of all construction tradespeople are women in the USA, not counting women in admin or management - only counting the actual trades workers. If women are going to do this, they shouldn't depend on the infrastructure that men created, and should be 100% in their world without men. Seems fair to me. If women are going to live without men, then commit to it. And the same with men. Men will have to do without having 284 pillows on their bed, hearing about how their friend's brother's sister's boyfriend's boss' mother re-decorated their house. It's a steep price, but I think men can do make it without women. And women without men. For one generation, anyways. Then if we do it worldwide, the Earth can do a reset and go back to where it was before humans messed it up. So it all works out perfectly. Put a bow on it.

However, I've read artificial uteruses https://imgur.com/lrwGAvv are right around the corner (hello Matrix), and so men can then buy an egg from a woman egg donor, do an artificial insemination, and grow the child in the artificial womb. That way, a man can have a baby but not be in jeapordy of losing the child or any assets like they would if they get married and then divorced. For companionship, maybe with these new robots, that will bring new companionship to the next level.
> If there’s a shortfall they will charge the banks a little extra in their next insurance payment, but keep in mind we’re talking about at most a few billion dollars spread over every bank; they are unlikely to pass on a small cost like that, but even if they do pass on the cost to the taxpayer it will be something like $10 per person maximum.

Regardless of size that sure sounds like “taxpayers will pick up the bill”
Twitter at it's most ridiculous. If you are worrying about the bank it is perfectly reasonable to take your money and to advise your portfolio companies to do the same.
You can update a branch without checking it out:
git pull origin master:master
Still, two commands..
No, and - not sure I understand the question - but most likely, also no.
I am not sure I understand the significance of this, anyone care to explain?
Banks move a trillion a day? Granted you could be right in about a month.
I hope they eventually give the word Open another meaning, for example, they can make their technology and method more open (source, maybe), and/or create a standardized platform to allow people to freely play with and extent their technology without the fear of big daddy restriction.

On the other hand, if they ended up chooses a different route, go patented everything and starts suing, then maybe it's better off for them to remove "Open" in their title just to make things more clear.
The use of F and Bar/Psi made me stop reading as every other text in this field always uses K and Pa and I had no reference what they meant. I know bar and Pa can be easily converted but they are odd scales to use.
Yes. As you say it arguably is actually worse to act this selfishly silently. Thiel didn't cause the losses at SVB, he is astute enough to understand how to be informed to the risks and rewards of acting regarding his money. If he speaks to that wisdom, he's being informative and helpful to his listeners.

I'm trying to be objective here, since my dislike of his political philosophy is pretty extreme.

Wearing the loss would be stupid. His ability to survive the losses isn't really material. If he had custody of other people's money and acted to preserve it, he acted wisely to their needs too. What he did I believe hastened the end for less wise people, with less ability to weather the risk and has downstream consequences which follow a run on a bank, in terms of impact on operating business. Stripe and other payment systems suspending clearing, payroll not happening is going to cause problems at large.

He's no more "wrong" than Pelosi or her husband or many other US senators and representatives are, trading against their heightened sense of awareness of the market. If Pelosi trades on inside information she may actually be worse than Thiel in this case (my belief is she has no prior knowledge which would exceed the insider-trading limits, and is technically not in breach of law even when I think what she does is totally reprehensible and inappropriate for an elected leader)
> According to a familiar story, science was born as a pastime of seventeenth-century European gentlemen

Is it a familiar story?

I've been told all my life that we had great thinkers and scientists since the ancient times. There were children cartoons about Archimedes, arab scientists and the likes when I was a kid in the '80s.
As far as coverage has stated so far, the underlying assets ARE solid...

Problem is they're just not even a good investment compared to brand new fed bonds / bills of short / long (might have that backwards) due to the now MUCH HIGHER interest rates. They locked in at historically low rates, and had a bank run on their free reserves.
Nowadays that's around 80 years +/-...
Microsoft Subsystem for Automatic Interpolation.
oh I've been down the "I can just fix macOS" road. The sooner you move away the better. so much time wasted on plugins like these.

you effort will just be null the second apple change the usability apis enabling hammerspoon, like they did countless times before. I don't even rename the name of the fallen apps before it.

instead now I contribute things as long lived proper features on KDE and hopefully advance humanity instead of apple profits.
To buy good loan you have to check whole supply chain. To issue a good loan you need to check only the borrower and you have every incentive to do so if you can't offload the loan to someone else after it's created.
> we don't have "socialized losses". Tax payers aren't paying for anything here. The FDIC is run an funded by an interbank consortium. Its essential a union of banks that run a collective risk pool and decide the rules of the risk pool.

What meaningful distinction are you drawing here? It's not practical to opt out of banking, and FDIC has no real competition (the NCUA offers exactly the same terms, and in the credit union thread fans were at pains to emphasise how equivalent to the FDIC it is). Not all taxes are collected by governments from individuals.
> Does this mean all American banks (indirectly bank customers) will pay to cover depositor losses that exceed insurance funds?

That assumes banks balance this liability by reducing payments to customers rather than reducing profits. That's a common and completely misleading claim by businesses - if they are taxed or fined, they pass it on to their customers (obviously, it's an attempt to create political support for the business).

The reality is that the ability to raise prices (or lower interest rates on deposits) depends on the elasticity. If you raise prices on your bottle of water at the supermarket, then people will just buy the bottle next to it - the water-maker will be paying and fee or tax increases out of their profits. If you have the only bottle of water in the desert, you can charge whatever you want. I would think that regular savings deposits, at least, are easily moved to another bank.

Another consideration is that if they could squeeze more out of customers, they'd probably already be doing it. By that theory, at least, they've already optimized or that and can't charge more.
Probably far fewer since implementing many capitalism-inspired reforms than when under a stricter form of communism. Why do you ask?
You're still sidestepping my original question, but to answer yours here is the definition of "intellectual" from the Cambridge Dictionary[1]:

-relating to your ability to think and understand things, especially complicated ideas

-very educated and interested in studying and other activities that involve careful thinking and mental effort

What do you find intellectual about acting or chess? The same almost assuredly applies to football, but it can be difficult to see if you don't even give sports any consideration in that regard.

You seem to be dismissing the mental aspects of sports because of the physicality involved, but physicality is a huge part of acting and even chess puts huge physical stress on one's body. People have literally died playing chess due to the physical stress. Subjects don't fall into a binary categorization of physical or mental. Sports, like many disciplines of art, requires both to varying degrees.

[1] - https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/intel...
Partially due to lobbying on behalf of SVB itself.
There are already alleged short sellers like him who are causing 'bogus fud'.

https://twitter.com/mikealfred/status/1634783756656492544
I wasn’t reader user, but it seems to me like when advertising self interest took over
it’s not a stack, but you can toggle to the prior branch with `git checkout -`

Or to move back N branches you can do: `git checkout @{-N}`
Executives are shameless. They'll lie to your face, backstab you to get more funds for their department over yours, and whatever else to get ahead for themselves. And they'll do it smiling all the way because they know they still win with their bags of cash payouts despite being "humiliated".

The only way people like that will learn is by sending them to prison. Their actions were so egregious, so completely in disregard for our financial system, that it's impossible to not have done any of that without intent. I'm sure if they turned over all electronic and paper documentation, there's gonna be a written strategy somewhere directing all this.
I found it to be saccharine and uninspired. Every line felt like some platitude you would find written on a faux distressed wooden sign at HomeGoods.

I see the animated shorts every year and it’s consistently my least favorite one that wins. It’s also usually the one put up by the biggest studio that wins.

I loved Ice Merchants.
More of the population lacks banking services than you think. According to a pre-pandemic report, IIRC, very large number have <$600 savings.
It's a bad name there, too, but physical products are expected to have a cost; software frequently is FOSS and gratis, so there's more room for a reasonable person to think that maybe they actually are what they claim to be.