skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
But none of his principles implies he should go fight to war. He wants Russia win, but wanting particular outcome does not imply joining army. There is nothing special about that either. I wanted ISIS to loose, I never joined any legions. I want Ukraine to win, but I am not going there to fight either.

If he claimed that not going is wrong, then he would be hypocrite. But it sounds more of "I want Russia to win and I accept human sacrifices along the way. That sux for them, but it is what it is" sort of attitude. Not exactly admirable, but also does not imply he should be volunteering.
You are talking about credit, not money. Banks create actual state-backed money, which can be physically (or more likely electronically) paid to a third party after they've loaned it to you.

A better example would be if you were in the bar alone, and had no money, and instead just wrote an IOU on a bit of paper with your contact details. If we lived in a mythical 100% trustful utopia, then the barman would just accept this as money and so would anyone else in future who the barman needed to pay for anything. But we obviously don't live in such a society so unfortunately no, not anyone can just create money!
Silicon Valley Bank collapse marks worst bank failure since Great Recession
Yup, missing those days where sharing consistet of more than 160 characters, only pictures or videos, or then text sprinkled with useless GIFs.

Gotta go back to those 2k-years where the phpBB-era was in it's high.
You keep what you kill. If you proof something wrong you gain its funds for research.
Several VC leaders met today to discuss the aftermath of SVB's downfall
I think they meant cunning.
You never know who's swimming naked until the tide goes out.
Wow, this is exactly what I was looking for!
HN isn’t a monolith. VCs certainly have the benefit of diversification, but founders generally don’t.
How does one learn to do stuff like this? You first learn doing AI algorithms in Python and then transfer the knowledge to C++ or you learn doing them in C++ from the start?
This btw is Jay Ersapah, Head of Financial Risk at SVB. Apparently DEI & LGBTQ issues were more important than making sure their assets & obligations are balanced: https://twitter.com/the_real_fly/status/1634035956188688385
Enterprise Code should be concerned with getting the best "order" of performance (i.e. O(n) over O(n^2)), but beyond that design for brevity and clarity.

Architecture wise, the Clean Architecture is a good starting point, I would enforce one or two rules - maybe domain seperation and business logic/driver seperation, but not go more zealous then that.
Really? You really find it that difficult?

https://rarbg.to/torrents.php?search=Climb+S01E01

https://torrentgalaxy.to/torrents.php?search=climb%20s01e01

https://1337x.to/search/climb+s01e01/1/

https://en.btdig.com/search?order=0&q=climb%20s01e01 (might be slower but just click on every magnet on there and see which one is quickest)

Took 5 seconds to find those.

You could google "top torrent sites", enter one search and be watching that show in less time than it took you to write that comment.

As others have said, it would take me a lot longer to find out which of the myriad streaming services actually have that show, and what device/app I need to actually watch that streaming service.
So why don’t we write plain old assembly then, ad absurdum?

Here are my thoughts in a bit more detail from a previous thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35061151
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decompression_sickness#Ascent_... :

> DCS [Decompression Sickness] is best known as a diving disorder that affects divers having breathed gas that is at a higher pressure than the surface pressure, owing to the pressure of the surrounding water. The risk of DCS increases when diving for extended periods or at greater depth, without ascending gradually and making the decompression stops needed to slowly reduce the excess pressure of inert gases dissolved in the body.

DCS > Prevention > Underwater diving: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decompression_sickness#Underwa... :

> Decompression time can be significantly shortened by breathing mixtures containing much less inert gas during the decompression phase of the dive (or pure oxygen at stops in 6 metres (20 ft) of water or less). The reason is that the inert gas outgases at a rate proportional to the difference between the partial pressure of inert gas in the diver's body and its partial pressure in the breathing gas; whereas the likelihood of bubble formation depends on the difference between the inert gas partial pressure in the diver's body and the ambient pressure. Reduction in decompression requirements can also be gained by breathing a nitrox mix during the dive, since less nitrogen will be taken into the body than during the same dive done on air. [85]
> This conflict between what we think we should be like and what we are actually like is the root of the problem.

I've seen this conflict a lot in my life and appreciate how you described it. I've found I've often been annoyed when I ask someone how they're doing and they say "fine" and I know they're not feeling fine. I realized maybe they're really saying "I want to feel fine." Something about splitting their desired state from their present state helped me.
Interestingly, becoming an enterpreneur is really uncommon in Europe, where all you said was free. I think it actually has an inverse effect.
To the extent that there is a real distinction between "Systems Programming" and "Whatever is not Systems Programming" and to the extent that this distinction matters, I tend to align with the take espoused in the Systems Programming[1] Wikipedia page:

The primary distinguishing characteristic of systems programming when compared to application programming is that application programming aims to produce software which provides services to the user directly (e.g. word processor), whereas systems programming aims to produce software and software platforms which provide services to other software, are performance constrained, or both (e.g. operating systems, computational science applications, game engines, industrial automation, and software as a service applications).

That is to say, the distinction I consider to be somewhat meaningful is between "Systems Programming" and "Application Programming", and I think this expresses the most salient aspect of the difference:

application programming aims to produce software which provides services to the user directly (e.g. word processor), whereas systems programming aims to produce software and software platforms which provide services to other software

But is all of this terribly important? Meh. I am not convinced that it is a terribly important distinction in most day to day contexts. And that's at least partly because the lines do seem to be a bit hand-wavy, subjective, and fuzzy.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_programming
This is partly because the UK is addicted to cheap food and has no interest in food security. The big supermarkets can push the price they pay for produce so low that farmers can't make a living so there is little demand for farmland.
Thinking about it as "text data" is both your and Chomsky's problem -- the >petabytes of data aren't preprocessed into text. They're streams of sensory input. It's not zero shot if it's years of data of observing human behavior through all your senses.

Other animals receiving data and not speaking isn't a good line of argument, I think. They could have very different hardware or software in their brains, and have completely different life experiences and therefore receive very different data. Notably, where animals and humans do have much potentially learned (or learned through evolution) behavior in common -- such as pathfinding, object detection, hearing, and high level behaviors like seeking food and whatever else.
That hasn’t been generally true for more than a decade. Where they still do it, they just have a shitty architect, and can and do happen regardless of tech stack.
That's a misunderstanding - when a bank originates a loan:

- the bank records an asset (the loan) and a liability (the deposit in the borrower's account)
- the borrower records an asset (the loan money now deposited at the bank) and a liability (the loan)

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/quarterly-...

At this point the money literally came out of thin air, there's more total currency in the system then there was before.

It might seem like an irrelevant nuance but it's pretty important to understanding how the money supply works
The suburbs are ironically, but not so surprisingly filled with crazy assholes that feel like the world belongs to them, or otherwise have some absurd levels of entitlement. They feel like they own the sidewalks, or if there's no sidewalks, they own the street and everything on it or not on it in front of their house, they feel like they should control whether or not a marginally higher density building should be built down the street or whether a neighbor can paint their house a different colour. When there's no land left, they want more cul-de-sacs built for them because it's the suburban dream and fuck wetlands anyway, and when there's no social services left, they want new ones built for them at everyone else's expense and they don't really want to be part of a community; they want to be by themselves, on their fat asses, in front of their fucking TV, the only quality of which they understand is how big it is.

I absolutely loath that world and never want to return.
SVB’s Stranded Deposits Spread the Pain from Tech to Napa Valley
But that is explicitly known by the type, we are not writing 90s era microsoft office (hungarian notation really should not be used).
Hardware may perform more operations per second, but inefficient software remains inefficient, and it's still wasting roughly the same amount of energy as it did on slower hardware, and waste only accumulates, skewing the performance of the rest of the system. That inefficiency gets multiplied by millions or billions of units worldwide that run this software.
i cannot confirm this
Tether is pretty much being propped up by thoughts and prayers at this point
https://archive.ph/W8aOn
Can you run away from all banks, though? Where do you put the money?
>Nuclear was more expensive then coal but not by that much

About 5x.

The environmental movement didnt make it cripplingly expensive.
There several reasons for that, but one key thing is that people do not, in general, desperatly dream of the „get rich quick“ to escape their life situation. A big share is simply well off, taken care of if there are problems, and live their live in good conditions.

I am fine with not every useless thing to exist and waste resources on that.
> this is basically moronic.

No, it’s smart! If it works out, you cashout and go on the speaking circuit patting yourself on the back for your ygenius. If it doesn’t, you’ve limited your own liability and someone else comes in and cleans up your mess.
Ask HN: What's the easiest way to create a font from a scanned book's text?
LLaMA-65B fits in 32GB of VRAM using state of the art GPTQ quantization with no output performance loss.

https://github.com/qwopqwop200/GPTQ-for-LLaMa
So you are saying that there are countries where USDC is legal while opening a foreign brokerage account like IBKR and converting your currency to USD is illegal? And this is not just a perceived loophole? Could you give an example of a country like this so I could google?
https://archive.is/Ger2q
This week in KDE: Qt apps survive the Wayland compositor crashing
And, this unjust behaviour with intent, like lies do, hurts not like a mere blow, but like erosion of goodwill and trust of everyone, including unborn yet children of all paths of life.
I can’t even log in through the website (“CSRF token missing or incorrect”). Useless non-Web bullshit.
Can you and should you measure success of your UX Department?
Yes and yes, but it’s even more important to understand how to do it correctly to keep everyone happy and content with their work.
Having read all that I am now even more confused and ambiguated.

Technical writing is hard.
Ruby 3.2 added WASI integration
I guess GTFO
If you only use the key to SSH then fine, but then I am not willing to pay more than 10€ for set of two.
Rule 1: if it works, refactor it
https://twitter.com/jimcramer/status/1634222320398086145

Hopefully it's not too omnious
How could someone think that this was a really good idea? It's like joining a pension fund with the average insured being over 50. Distribute risk whenever possible.
If you have that kind of money in cash you pay someone to do that for you. If you want access to your money you don't juggle credentials, you call your banker and ask.

Actually even if you don't have millions you can use sweep accounts that automatically spread money across multiple bank accounts. Fidelity has one that anyone can use.
Close, fine tuning LLaMA in 8bit has been done. It requires very little VRAM compared to typical fine tuning.

https://github.com/zphang/minimal-llama#peft-fine-tuning-wit...
How to audit for open services with iproute2
And they’d make money on the bailout, right?
You can always initialize a hybrid approach, load-balancing across your cloud AZs and your on-premises infrastructure for sudden spikes in elasticity demand. Not trivial but works well. Yet you also need to factor in the payroll.
Fraunhofer ISE, Viessmann develop multi-source residential heat pump
Inverse Cramer
It’s also a clientele mix issue.

If you have a healthy mix of business and retail clients, payday is a wash. If it’s a lot of business customers; every payday is like a predictable mini bank run.

If you have a small number of large, correlated and communicating players, you have a huge bank run risk.
I'm sure there are all kinds of things we don't know about the planets and universe. But astrologers make positive claims about particular effects on human life. These claims are unfounded.

The fact we don't know everything does not give anybody a free pass to just make up bullshit.
You do realize that everything Tether says is a lie ?

It's all just a huge scam.

It's not easily provable with Treasuries, but it was easily provable when they claimed to hold something like the 8th biggest position in US commercial paper - which is not traded anonymously - and no commercial paper trader ever traded with them.
>That nuclear is expensive is also nonsense. France had incredibly cheap electricity prices for 50 years and most of that was

Was thanks initially to lavish state subsidies and subsequently lax maintenance of their reactor fleet which meant that their reactors kept being shut down for maintenance.

EDF is now basically bankrupt and France is building a ton of new reactors at eye watering expense which still won't be enough to replace all the reactors that have aged out.

Theyre officially hoping solar and wind can make up the difference.

The nuclear industry can only function with lavish state subsidies and those subsidies are only provided by states that need an industrial backing for their nuclear military or who have a strong desire for a nuclear option (Iran, south Korea, Sweden).
They can try, but if JPMorgan CEO is getting such a call it's going to be painful for you and you're going to be in a bad place for negotiating those 10 basis points.
Early systems were driven by water pressure. Modern systems have an electric motor for each pair of wheels.
I am just not at all paranoid about my SSH keys. Those are password protected and the worst that you can do with them is to run some low yield miner on my machines. I guess you could "steal" my source code, but I publish it free on github anyway.

Maybe convenient if you are administrator or something, but for normal life seems unnecessary.

However I can see the appeal of having everything behind a physical factor
Why did dark mode get so popular? Is it because laptop screens and other screens are finally pretty bright?
I don't consider them to have any tradeoff.
So far I am not losing any time applying TDD. And Clean Architecture seems common sense.
There's been some good research in the UK about the impact of class size in schools there. The summary is that it is unlikely to be the most effective way of improving outcomes:

https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-eviden...
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/class-size-and-ed...
Roubini. He’s predicting another crash driven by debt.
Apparently, he was recently hyping up SVB, the one that just went under.
Apart from the drama unfolding, the issue with too much rain, specially during or after a drought, is that the earth isn't able to absorb the water properly in order for it to be as useful as one would wish.
The big tip-off that all is not as it seems is that he calls himself "Uncle Bob" Martin.

Functions should do only one thing. Sure, but what does that actually /mean/? If a function calls two other functions, then surely, by definition, it's doing two things? So how much a function is doing is a question of how far you stand back when looking at it.

Also, if you follow a rule of functions having only 2-4 lines, then you're going to have a lot of functions, and tracing through code paths is going to be like peeling back layers of an onion. So that advice is just wrong.

It's not even clear that long functions are a problem. Back in the early 80's my A level computing science teacher, who had worked in industry, said that there was no real evidence to suggest that long functions are less readable.

There was a joke going around some time ago about an interviewee who was asked how big a function would be. He said "I like to be able to keep it within my head." When asked to elaborate, he said "I put my head against the screen. If the function is longer than that, then it's too long." Although facetious, I think that's actually a good idea. A function should be at most a screenful, so you can see it complete on the screen.

Recently, I wanted to customise my own gopher client. I first messed around with one written in Go, but it was too complicated to adapt for what I wanted. I switched to a C alternative, which was still a bit too complicated. I decided that I'd basically re-write the whole thing in C++, using whatever bits of functionality from the C part that I thought useful.

If there is a magic formula to writing good code, then I'd say that the less code you have the better, and try to keep code reasonably decoupled. The problem with writing applications is that there's a tendency to be promiscuous in how you use objects. So, in essence, every part of the program relies on every other part of the program. There's no separability of design. It is better to take a "library" approach to things, where each "module" doesn't know how it is going to be used. You then have co-ordinating functions which stitch this functionality together. The code you end up with should be much easier to adapt.

It's also useful not to be overambitious with your project. Someone once said that the genius of Ritchie and Thompson was being able to obtain 90% of the functionality using 10% of the code. If you think parsimoniously in that way, they'll be a lot less code to wade through when you want to modify things.
I’m not a diver; but the physiology of these depth effects is fascinating! TIL that these hypoxic mixes are needed because of a combination of two effects: nitrogen narcosis[0] and oxygen toxicity[1]. The former is due to diffusion of any gas, apart from helium, into neurons in the CNS under high pressure, while the latter is due to the raised partial pressure of O2 at depth. 100% O2 is cumulatively toxic at sea level, but at depth its toxicity is enhanced at what would be a normal 21%. At least that’s my layman’s understanding.

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_narcosis
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen_toxicity
There are little hints strewn out through the code that suggests it is indeed “trimmed” from a larger codebase.
So let's assume a bank has collected deposits worth £1000 from all of its customers. Now the bank makes a loan of £100 to one of its customers and puts the money into the customer's current account at the bank.

According to your theory, what is the total amount of deposits at this bank after making the loan?

If, as you say, banks were lending deposits, then the total amount of deposits cannot possibly have changed and that new loan of £100 would have to come out of some other customer's bank account.

I would be pissed if my bank account balance suddenly dropped and the bank told me, sorry we have lent your money to someone else.

So this is clearly not what's happening.
Clean code is defined as code that improves programmer efficiency and program readability, eschews premature optimisation by optimising for simplicity, makes code less complex and objectively better by optimising for readability, allowing virtually anyone to safely and easily change it when really needed.

So you're actually a clean code proponent.

As is usually the case with such debates, it is a debate of differing definitions masquerading as a debate of differing arguments.
It's the most Canadian response you can give, before choking someone out that is
Rethinking Gold as a Currency (2011)
Thus bugs me a bit.
Shouldn't it be "lifeboat tethered to it", not "it tethered to lifeboat"?

Eg, little unstable thing tethered to larger, more stable thing?
Trimming spaces from strings faster with SVE on an Amazon Graviton 3 processor
so ... sounds like you agree?
Pastures used for grazing are managed intensively using big machines. (Source: I live next door to a large dairy farm. Pastures irrigated with centre-pivot systems.) Pastures get replanted/supplemental sowing every so often, weeds get sprayed with herbicides, fields get mowed to maintain uniform growth after they've been grazed...
Ok. Fair enough. I just find that what Uncle Bob calls clean code is often not clean code for me. E.g. preferring inheritance over switch is less readable. Flexibility/extensibility and readability are different things.
Learned recently Fastmail backend is actually written in Perl.
for many people enjoying themselves means being able to enjoy their own home without being forced to listen to other people excessive noise even through closed windows.
You cannot buy USD on chain to directly transact with it and other crypto, no.
My personal distinction is that application programming is more selfish, not interested in most other parallel applications whereas systems programming needs to take a more global view to ensure the system serves sufficient resources to all applications