skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> and it's ADHD patients historically who were one of the groups of patients who found this out for themselves.

I guess the things that work with immediate changes are going up be easier to spot. But even then you don't often know the expected result with (for example) pain killers. On the other hand, if ritalin wouldn't work as usual, it would be really obvious to me within a couple hours.
Imagine the absolute glee of the purchaser.
The peg is held up by the belief that you can always get 1 USD for 1 USDC.

Obviously the market had some doubts about this today and then liquidity issues drove the price down. I'm somewhat surprised that it climbed back up this fast which means that the panic seems to be over (for the moment).
This is the exact kind of dystopic thinking that is feared with the use of AI.

"We regularly take randomized samples and have not found error, your appeal has been denied."

I mean come on, ethics anybody??
I don't really know what you're try to say with this short blurb. Yes, money has to be taken out of the system via taxes and then not re-spent in order to successfully shrink the money supply. But compared with the current approach of creating new money and spending it, raising money through taxes for that spending will be an improvement.

Also focusing on executive spending is a bit of a red herring given how much outflow has occurred from the Fed itself over the past few decades via low interest rate loans. Basically rather than letting the gains from technology and offshoring accrue throughout society (via price deflation), or be spent purposefully (executive spending), the Fed has been squandering these gains to create an asset bubble.
When I was using this site a lot back in 2009, it really was ad-free. Even more minimal than what it is now. Each exercise page had a super-small dithered GIF image of a person doing the exercise. Those seem to be gone now.
Yeah, it is pretty ironic having this come from all the same people that were oh-so-libertarian when it wasn't affecting them.
I don’t think there’s any doubt the depositors and clients of the bank are being bailed out.
Thanks for the amazing read.
They deposited 3B with this bank for the specific purpose of it being a safe place.

Their 10B in cash was spread over 6 banks to diversify the bank risk.

They have plenty of higher risk investments in their treasury, but these ones were the safe ones intentionally put into banks with insurance. If the government protection wasn't there the investment would’t have been there in the first place
Why does that sort of “infant mortality” matter in finance if they play by the same rules?

I’m not being argumentative, just trying to understand. In physical systems, that view would be used to apply additional stress testing early to reduce the overall risk exposure (e.g., test a pump for a certain run time to be assured it’s made it out of the early failure age and is more likely to last a lot longer). I’m not quite sure how this applies to contrived (non-physical) systems.
They don't even need a bailout. Ordinary big government regulation is solving this.
> some global partners are displaying excellence in cooperative data sharing and full disclosure on consumption patterns to help inform policy development: https://youtu.be/gfIoS9NB0Wg

Are you serious?

Two tourists with anecdotes

The topic is science and data not tourist's reckons
Nice metaphor combo!
The article has an entire infographic titled "Most banks held more assets than deposits at the time they failed".
"Fun factoid" The CEO of SVB used to be CFO of Lehman I guess that explains a lot ...
The modern web makes more money than the "spray and pray" ad affiliate links model that crashed in 2001.
Ask HN: Any aggregated banking service since FDIC protects only $250k
Read through the SVB news, just learned that FDIC only protects up to $250k cash for you in each bank. So just a naive thinking: is there any sort-of aggregation service existing to help automatically spread your $10M fat wallet into 40 banks, and auto-withdraw if you need more than $250k.

I don't think super-rich will need this though.
USDT always regained its peg until one day it doesn't
The results I want are long term health. That is much harder to measure and study. I can see which exercise methods results in competitive wins quickly (though some may be a few years), but what will my efforts today change about my life span or old age quality of life?
React _usually_ queues up a render, which is then executed at the end of the event loop tick. This allows many calls to `setState()` in the same tick to result in a single render pass at the end.

The default behavior is that _if_ there are any changes that are needed based on the render, React then continues ahead and applies them to the DOM, and most of the time that is done immediately.

When a render is queued, React keeps the info about the requested state update as part of the queue, and those state changes are calculated and applied as part of the "render phase". So, if you happen to call `setState(2); setState(3);`, the second call completely overrides the first and there won't even be an attempt to render the component using the `2` value. (You can use the `setState(prevValue => 3)` form to force React to do each value separately.)

As of React 18, the new "concurrent rendering" features like `startTransition` and Suspense allow React to alter priorities of renders, and split the calculation into multiple chunks over time with pauses in between. When React _is_ done determining any changes in that render pass, it still applies them to the DOM in a single synchronous "commit phase".

The other caveat is that React will sometimes execute a full render+commit synchronously under specific conditions, such as a `setState` inside of a `useLayoutEffect` hook.

I wrote an extensive detailed post called "A (Mostly) Complete Guide to React Rendering Behavior" that tries to explain a lot of these nuances:

- https://blog.isquaredsoftware.com/2020/05/blogged-answers-a-...
New Room-Temperature Superconductor Discovered by Scientists
Argh, so obvious in hindsight, thank you.
The shortfall only occurred because they had to sell their assets before maturity, and the value of those assets have decreased. If they were able to hold them to maturity there wouldn't have been a problem - they still pay out the same amount of money at the end - but right now people are willing to pay less for future money than they used to. So if they spend 90 bucks on a bond that matures in 5 years and pays 100 bucks, if they were able to hold for 5 years, they'd still have gotten their hundred. But, both the accidental run (no new vc money while companies keep spending their deposits) and the actual run on thursday meant they had to get that cash back now, and today people might only be willing to pay 80 bucks for that bond that still pays 100 bucks 4 years from now, so they lose 10 bucks. This is why if there was no run, there was no shortfall, but because there was a run, there was shortfall.
> For every web-related HN post there’s always that one person who keeps reminding how it was all better 15 years ago and how you actually dont need any colours on web since they are so irritating.

You are a) massively over-interpreting the comment you are replying to, and b) taking it way too personally.
Come on, give examples please don't leave me hanging! I think the Mafia are sick fucks, but lots of governments have been too. No shortage of violence in this pit of animals on this stupid space rock.

But thousands of times more gruesome than that!? That's wild. I've watched Cartel vids where they slice open and expose the vocal cords laterally as their victims wail, creating otherworldly sounds.

But that's like... MAYBE 0.5x as gruesome as torturing some poor helpless child or tossing infant into a barrel of acid. So if you've got stuff that's 1000x as gruesome, I can't even comprehend! Please post.
He seems like exactly the same stupid, entitled con-man he's always been to me.
I mean pure vs impure.

> you can "mutate state" in regular callbacks without useEffect

Yes, via `useState`. That too gets overused. (Note: useEffect and useState are 100% necessary, but also easily overused.)

useEffect for when you want to manipulate state outside the component. I.e. change the document title, exchange data with an HTTP server, store data in localStorage.
> The slave trade peaked around 11% of the UK economy

As your own source states, focusing on this single number is overly reductive:

> Any indirect linkage effects are not included in the quantitative estimates presented here.

> The growth of economic activities directly associated with the Triangular Trade or the American plantation complex would in turn have contributed to the development of other parts of the economy, through backward and forward linkages to a host of other value-chains. For example, a growth in demand for maritime shipping associated with the Triangular Trade most certainly had effects upon the development of the financial, insurance, and shipbuilding industries. It has also been argued that these factors helped drive the development of docks in the ports of Europe.

> In addition, it has been suggested that this would include fundamental shifts in institutions and economic structures. The growth of the Atlantic trade may thus have had other important consequences, for example, through contributing to institutional change in Britain, as Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson have famously argued.

> Activities of this magnitude can hardly be dismissed as marginal to the British economy at the time.

--------

> European powers that never engaged in the slave trade or colonialism, namely Germany

What? Germany was absolutely involved in colonialism. Slavery perhaps not in an official state capacity given the lateness of its formation relative to the Trans-Atlantic trade, but people from the region certainly were.

> Same is true for free states versus slave states in America.

Again this is overly dismissive of the economic interplay between North and South. The Northern textile industry was reliant on cotton grown in the South, and the South provided an important outlet for Northern goods.

[1]

> As for the lack of a home market, southern consumers generated a significant demand for northern-made shoes, clothing, locomotives, steamboats, farm implements--to name just a few products--that encouraged such promoters as Gregg and De Bow to believe that a market for southern manufactures existed if it could only be exploited.

[1] Battle Cry of Freedom, pp. 97
I understand you now and agree.
> It's like looking at the copper wiring on the motherboard, or the pins of the CPU, when what you really want is the logic from the networked gates (transistors).

and what you kind of really want is a debugging guide to an OS.

hah hah it is to laugh.
I was thinking something similar ... enter for "carriage return" inside a text entry field, then XMIT to send everything off.
> What data did he use to come to the conclusion the "overwhelming majority" wouldn't feel any change and is he talking about the ADHD patient population or the general patient population?

This was my thought as well. Im very sensitive to manufacturers and spent months bugging my pharmacist to tell me which "brand" they had in stock so I could pick the one with least side-effects. Even though they had a note in my file they would just give me whatever they felt like and told me there was no difference.

It took a different pharmacist who was also sensitive to understand my problem - to the point she chased me down this month after paying to tell me that it was a new manufacturer she hadn't seen filled for me and wanted to double check I wanted it before leaving the store. With the shortage I didnt care & was why she filled it before checking since it was all they had and would run out if she waited. And, it's not great, it's weaker which causes me to get tired (small doses put me to sleep), and starts to dissolve instantly so it will sometimes stick if I dont drink fast enough.

I think that is one of the biggest problems. If people think they should all work the same and then get worse side effects they think its a fake, but it's probably just a different manufacturer that they have no idea to even check.

For those that do, they dont seem to consider they are sensitive to the change. The best manufacturer for me is Camber, it's the only one that has no side-effects and "just works". The first few days I thought it was a sugar pill until I realized just how much I got done without even noticing. But do a quick search and people are outraged at getting switched to them and trying to get the FDA to revoke it.
"The actual internet" allowed people to get information 20x times faster than before (e.g. vs physically going to a library, or writing a letter to an expert). If we now have a technology that lets us get answers 20x times faster than what we had before it, then yes - I see this technology as a huge advancement over the "old" internet.
I hope so. But we have not seen that yet.

Have the shares been canceled? Are the partners bankrupted?

Too soon to tell. Remember AIG
That's not so simple. I agree USDC is still in a solid position, markets are overreacting, and this is very different than e.g. Terra collapse. But you're assuming any eventual losses (e.g. the 7.6%) would be equally distributed across all users. That is not the case.

If there's a run on the bank, the first users will get 100% of their funds at 1:1 peg (see Circle's announcement earlier today [1]), until they run out of liquidity. Then the remaining users are left holding the bag, and get a fraction of whatever is left after months of litigation.

The fear of being the last one holding the bag is what triggers bank runs, despite a bank run being the worst possible outcome for everyone. It's a classic prisoner's dilemma.

ps: not financial advice, etc, etc.

[1] https://www.circle.com/blog/an-update-on-usdc-and-silicon-va...
And this is well explained in many places. SVB had deposits, many over 250k. They bought long term us govt bonds with rates available at the time. Then rates went up quite a bit over a short term. The old bonds lost value, because new bonds had higher rates, making the old bonds with lower rates worth less. These were effectively losses that were not yet recognized. The bank must have bought new bonds with new deposits as rates went up. But they still have loses on their old bonds, those more than a year old or so. That could have been a lot of money.

Then when lots of people starting taking their money out, they had to sell some of those lower rate, lower valued (losses) bonds to pay those people out. This increased as more people started taking their money out, eventually the bank lost all its capital through these "old bond w lower rates losses". This is fascinating, but also impactful because probably lots of banks have the same problem in the us.
China has it...
13B feels on-par with the base non-instruction davinci. People might not realize how it was a bit trickier to prompt gpt3 when it first released.
That doesn't bother me so much. GPT-3 had instruction tuning, which makes it MUCH easier to use.

Now that I've seen that LLaMA can work I'm confident someone will release an openly licensed instruction-tuned model that works on the same hardware at some point soon.

I also expect that there are prompt engineering tricks which can be used to get really great results out of LLaMA. I'm hoping someone will come up with a good prompt to get it to summarization, for example.
>There are some posts there that get the science right

I'm sorry, I don't mean to be uncharitable, but 'exercise science' is not an empirical scientific field like physics or chemistry. It's very difficult to conduct genuine experiments or isolate causes in the human body. It's pretty well-known that lots 'exercise science' studies that prove X were conducted with relatively untrained undergrad volunteers, who would probably gain on any program because they're a) young and b) exercise newbies. Political science has 'science' right in the name too, but I think everyone understands it's not an actual empirical field either (which is fine!)

I'm certainly open to hearing contributions from exercise scientists, but I weight folk wisdom from say the bodybuilding or powerlifting fields at least as heavily

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_envy
Heck, I don't think I'd manage to have $250k in liquidity in my whole life and this is my standard operating procedure for my money.

You never know when some weird, once-in-a-lifetime stuff is going to hit your bank. Learned the lesson the hard way when I ended up stranded in the middle of nowhere without a working debit card for a damned IT outage.
I think the "building in public" approach has been a failure though. Unreal Tournament didn't work. Crowdfunding can work, but I think people probably are leery of that for larger projects or studios without a track record of success.

And with a project like Unreal Tournament you're not going to get the flood of hat money and other MTX bullshit that currently feeds studios. Even if you want to pay for a game pass, I can just give myself the game pass on my own local copy, and get all the same stuff right?

I'm not entirely saying that (Jim Sterling voice) "triple-A gaming" dying is the worst thing in the world mind you, but, we'd be talking about some really tectonic shifts in how things get built and I think the pot of addressable money is really a lot smaller.

Hopefully it would lead to more passion projects and not just the death of the industry.

Like I said I think patents have been a scourge, but copyright in the sense of owning the thing you wrote, is less problematic. Derivative works are the problem case that I've previously talked about though since I think humans go through our world deriving and remixing everything we see and touch and that's not a bad thing. And AI is going to make all of this very problematic in not-very-many years either, 5-10 years and AIs will be writing great software and making great creative works without significant human intervention.

Once we move past capitalism as a concept, then yes, by all means these things can go away too ;)
What if anything does this mean then? FTA:

>As a regulated payment token, USDC will remain redeemable 1 for 1 with the U.S. Dollar.
It’s reported that SVB paid executives bonuses to grab cash right before they were shit down. Each of these executives names should be published & exposed as the grifters they are.
Maybe domestic abuse records are more readily available?
Lifting is complicated for the same reason that dating is complicated. Not everyone is starting from the same place. Not everyone will see the same results, in the same time. That is where the complexity arises. People will see others doing better, and try to find shortcuts, or magic panaceas.
But the insurance doesn't apply to the full amount.
Depends on the modern SATA SSD, QLC SSDs are quite a bit slower than 200 MB/s for writing (something like a Samsung 870 QVO manages about 150 MB/s real-world, cheaper ones are probably even slower), so they're actually slower than current HDDs for sequential writes.
I liked the site, but let's be honest: they didn't vet contributors too well, and they were full of contradictory advice.
Pausing USDC->USD over the weekend isn't going to help confidence either.
Hey everyone!

I'm excited to announce my first public project, Paddock Posters! This website is a gallery that showcases the latest posters released by Formula 1 teams over the season.

As a huge Formula 1 fan myself, I've always been interested in the design and artwork that goes into the posters teams release for each race. I realized that there wasn't a single platform where fans could browse, and that's where the idea for Paddock Posters was born.

I'll continue updating the site during the season as posters are released and have also created a newsletter so that you can stay up to date if you'd like.

So, if you're a Formula 1 fan or just appreciate great artwork, head over to Paddock Posters and have a browse. If you have any feedback or suggestions, feel free to let me know in the comments!
In the US it’s actually illegal for them to require that you return mistakes like that thanks to the FTC.
> people who really know what they're doing in zsh

Any examples of cool stuff you can do in zsh?
There’s no likely avenue through which social media leads to death. It’s that simple. Tobacco products kill a lot of people.

The problems you list are significant and bad, but many of them will improve as society as a whole learns to parent in an age of social media. Not just this, but as people grow to see how negatively social media affects you, the public attitudes toward it will change and adapt. At no point in this process is social media going to be killing people.

I’m not saying that social media doesn’t cause the very negative things you outline. I’m just pointing out that it’s not as bad as smoking.

That being said, I’m all for legislation that stops young people from using social media. I think it would be totally reasonable to make it illegal under a certain age.
Why doesn't Rails qualify as boring?
Liquidity is being able to sell, it is relative to price

There is no "fair price". Price is a scaler, it has no morals or ethics
Data retention is kind of meaningless in this context since there's so many ways it is laundered/absorbed/analyzed while not technically violating whatever legalese they use this month.
I have 4 of these each with 16GB ECC RAM. Used them as a ZFS cash. They run kinda hot.
That bank account only needs to hold about 1 month of expenses. Not a lot of people have over 250k monthly expenses...
Your words are harsh, but they are true. Our industry has been a train wreck of mediocre ideas capturing mindshare and spread with religious fervour. Money, damned filthy lucre, is of course the reason behind this.

I don’t blame the players, but I do wish there was some way to inoculate the herd. Perhaps we need a proper religious tradition. Robes would at least make it fun.
One of the biggest issues in React that I have come across is that you have to make copies of objects and arrays (as mentioned in this article) when calling setState(). Cloning works well for small arrays and objects (I use the code below for that), but for large arrays with thousands of items (for example, datagrid scenario) this is inefficient. My solution is to modify the array/object directly then just call setState({}). Does anyone have a better solution?

export function deepClone<T>(obj: T): T {
if (obj == null || typeof obj !== 'object')
return obj;

const clone = new (obj as any).constructor();

for (let key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key))
clone[key] = deepClone(obj[key]);
}

return clone;
}
Excellent post! 100% agree.
Also because they aren't nearly as common. Just because this exists in some form outside of the US doesnt mean that it happens at the same scale.
That one post seems to say, too bad, you die but it's for a good cause because two other people didn't die in a car crash.
What’s the alternative? Hiring humans to do the job for you? Probably much more expensive.
The shortage is entirely arbitrary, and only exists in the US.

We had a significant increase in ADHD diagnosis during the pandemic, because telehealth is much more approachable for people with untreated ADHD.

Despite that increase, the DEA refused to increase the arbitrary limit for how much Adderall can be manufactured in the US. So we have an entirely avoidable shortage on our hands.
I've been saying this to myself too many times now...

This will become indispensable sooner than anyone imagines or wants it to.
OpenAI have built Jukebox - I'm pretty sure they can create a very good text-to-speech model whenever they decide it's worth the effort.
Then this is SD for Apple silicon users. 13B runs on my m1 air at 200-300ms/token using llama.cpp. Outputs feel like original GPT-3, unlike any of the competitors I’ve tried. Granted- non-scientific first impressions.