skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
See what I mean, you care more about saving face than the people suffering. "none of its true, I can dispute it, its you who is wrong"

Look, I don't know why you keep replying to me. No one buys your propaganda and conspiracy theories and whataboutism. You can keep getting upset all you want but it doesn't change the fact you're doing nothing more than attempting to protect the CCP.
He can sue in both places probably. He should sue in the USA to set a precedent on behalf of all persons with disabilities.
Framework-Defined Infrastructure
What are we using OpenAI API for? Is it only for present & validation rules creation? Or even to cleanse data? If it's being used for latter, what about data-privacy concerns?
Back in 2000, there was the "3 second rule": web pages should be fully loaded within 3 seconds. At the time it was very much optimization of image size as loading was pretty much serial, with no async HTTP requests.

It saddens me that we have become so complacent; sites like Jira take 5 to 8 seconds to load a page that feels like it should be near instantaneous, and we're supposed to be OK with that. Under the hood, these sites are a spaghetti of nested API calls that probably make a lot of sense to the people owning the products but severely affect user experience.
Ah that makes sense. Thank you for explaining.
You can have a picture of yourself in a wheelchair and have any of a wide variety of permanent disabilities—or none! You could have just broken your leg. Or, and this may come as a shock, you can actually be fully healthy and abled and still sit in a wheelchair for a picture.

There is not one single thing case in there that makes it OK for an employer to disclose medical information about you, however vague or detailed.
"Needs protecting" is a policy choice. Mexicans used to just come and go. Then, as an economic policy choice, we decided to close up the border, now migrants only want to come and not leave.

There are not "more border crossings" today, there are fewer. The Border Patrol is massive and bloated but the peak border interdiction rates of the 80s and 90s remain the records.
What I gather from the comments is that perhaps Amazon is facing a goodwill issue and their advertising budget is a function of that.

What is the play here? Should Amazon focus on quality goods from quality suppliers in order to rebuild brand trust?
> Why not ask the much more interesting and potentially useful question of balancing a binary tree?

Honestly? Because that's harder.

The swapping question is basically a softball / FizzBuzz-style question to test the most basic familiarity with data structures, pointers/references, and recursion.
At first I thought this would be about performance, but now I think it's not.

Their github.io page mentions interesting use cases though:

> RustPython can be embedded into Rust programs to use Python as a scripting language for your application, or it can be compiled to WebAssembly in order to run Python in the browser
I think this was posted now because of the public firing yesterday, and perhaps OP didn’t find a link. As this was happening yesterday, I posted a link to the twitter thread, but it didn’t catch on.

@dang Perhaps the link should change to a news story about the actual incident people are talking about
The problem here is that "minimal" car ownership due to high prices does not mean car ownership concentrated amongst those who needs cars, necessarily.
Huh, if that's the case, why would the linked article claim that they want to replace eSIM? Is Ars just wrong here?
This happens a lot; something quotable is eventually shorn of its original context and used completely inappropriately. A much older example is "neither a borrower nor a lender be", repeated as a wise proverb, from Shakespeare no less! The generally-ignored context is that Shakespeare put it in the mouth of Polonius, a character whose apparent role it is to be wrong about everything.
> Also what kind of privacy informations would you share in OSS community

If you are building a community, then people chatter around the common area (this chatroom or server) about work and real life stuff just like they do at the water cooler and at conferences because we’re humans and not code monkeys who want to connect to one another. That’s normal, but letting corporations read that data should not be normalized considering we already have the technology, E2EE. With E2EE law enforcement and the government couldn’t read it either. The public side should be public and search indexable, but the private messages should be private. Without good support of third-party clients (which corps like Discord like to shut down), implementing something like OTR is much more difficult and I doubt many folks would bother going through the effort to exchange PGP keys and, I dunno like, using some browser add-on to seamlessly do the encryption/decryption in the browser for you.

With a technology like XMPP or Matrix, users could self-host a server behind a proxy or Tor and join the discussion anonymously without having to create an account or sacrifice that anonymity if they didn’t want to, and that should be allowed and acceptable.

With IRC, it’s flawed but most of the big servers are at least ran by foundations and non-profits which have different motives with how they would collect and treat that data.

Do you like eavesdroppers when you’re in chatting to a friend in a public space? Would you be happy to be constantly recorded while in such a space behind a closed door too? And then those recordings sold or given to the cops when they requested? Because that’s what you’re signing everyone up for when Discord is chosen, and you have the option of not doing that.
Service Weaver is a programming framework for writing and deploying cloud apps
I think the whole fast vs slow thinking is also a bit tied up with kind of like "raw intelligence" vs "trained skill". I think there are some people who are really really smart and fast thinkers, and some people who are less smart and slower. But the thing is, being smart doesn't mean being right. Especially as things get complicated where methodology or background research become critical components of getting the right answers. Knowledge is probably more important than intelligence in the application of knowledge. Intelligence may be more important in the discovery of knowledge, and even then, it require the sufficient patience to acquire prerequisite knowledge in the first place.

I'm not sure that one is better than the other, but I suspect there is a lot of frustration embedded in mismatching what you want to be doing vs what you are good at.
And for hosted solution, is there a provision to configure our OpenAI Key? Or every OpenAI interaction goes through YoBulk's Open AI Key?
Yep that would be what I would do - effectively a functional approach where no memory is required besides the current set and iteration.

A big part of materializing datasets for performance is finding the right grain that is both easy enough to calculate and also can do nice things like be resumeable for snapshots.
So we all subsidize the cost eventually as consumers?
1. Please expand on how you are defining full text search distinctly from sparse search to continue the discussion. My understanding is that full-text search is built on inverted indexing which is the intended meaning behind "sparse" search -- whether that be BM25 sparse or SPLADE sparse or exact keyword / phrase matching, my understanding is that it is the same underlying index algorithm with distinctions in scoring for BM25 / SPLADE.

2. The original argument references "combined system" in the sense of Hybrid Search (BM25 + Dense Vector Search). I don't think this is a fair comparison -- model inference services are extremely lightweight relative to the sparse / dense indexing systems we are primarily discussing. I also have not advocated for Cross Encoder inference in the spirit of improving latency, just clarifying why a module system is used for it.

3. The hybrid search results from researchers independent of either of us are linked in the original comment, here it is again - https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.10582. Your criticism of the Weaviate ANN benchmarks isn't relevant to our discussion on Hybrid Search. I have linked this to show that Weaviate has produced comparative benchmarks which was your original claim. Although I do not agree with your premise that a full-scan search with give similar speed results to HNSW on this setup, or however arbitrarily we are defining "good results". I acknowledge that it is not included in the benchmark report and is something that should be added. I also agree that it would be interesting to run ANN recall tests on several hardware configurations.
Meta has a clear effectivity problem. Recipe:

1. Make everybody hate your main products.

2. Focus all of your innovation in a direction nobody wants.

No amount of efficiency can fix that.
Sorry about your friends being abused by what turns out to be a malicious employer. That stress ripples. Good luck to them in finding a healthier work environment.

I always felt like the marketing around self-driving Tesla's was misleading. They named it misleadingly, ambitiously but misleadingly. So I feel Musk has broken the integrity of the feature since its inception and roll out.

Bizarre about the radar, that sounds like an actual safety problem.

Seeing how he makes guinea pigs out of everyone, to me suggests he'll do anything to get to Mars.
Because copying China isn't a great way to devise policy. China bans many things that are good and should remain protected in the US.

I don't use Tiktok or have a strong opinion on it specifically, but I really disagree with the notion that we should reflexively ban things because China banned something similar first.
Ask HN: What can I do with my DevOps Experience?
I have been fortunate enough to roll out the microservice (kubernetes) infrastructure for one of the largest websites on the internet.

However, I know that I do not want to do Ops work professionally. I kinda just fell into it right out of college and chose it because I saw the potential.

However, I feel like that knowledge has gone to complete waste and wonder if I could leverage it in some unique ways.

What would you recommend that I do?
To solve the problem that is C.
I talked to this old hippie drug dealer who was talking about all of these things he wouldn’t touch any more because the chance of fentanyl was too high and he’d had friends killed by fentanyl. Exactly the opposite kind of person to be susceptible to that kind of moral panic.

Locally they recently did a bust and found enough raw fentanyl for a million lethal doses or enough to get every single person in the extended metro area high.

A cheap drug where an amount equal to a few grains of sand can kill is indeed worth the concern.
I always liked the idea of OpenID, but you're right, it was far too complex for the average person. I was enthusiastic about it, but never got around to using it because it wasn't simple enough.

I think the kind of approach used here is a bit better than OpenID in terms of separating authentication and identity. You have a permanent account on the service for authentication and the identity (your domain) is more of a pointer / shortcut. That strikes a good balance in terms of letting the service provider dictate authentication policies without usurping your identity people recognize.

Unfortunately I don't think any of the big tech companies would get onboard with an idea like this. They're all racing / competing to control identity right now. Although I've always thought the idea would fit well with Twitter.
It’s funny, I know both men and women sucked into Amway, but there certainly are gendered MLM schemes.

There is the stereotype, somewhat backed by reality, that women are better at maintaining relationships. MLM could have the hook not just that you’ll make money but also develop meaningful relationships with your ‘downline’. Another poster noted that men also were more likely to put effort into certain hobbies and my own observation is that there are groups of people other than autists who develop ‘special interests’ and it may be something many men do in lieu of developing relationships.
The source data is linked in the article:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5...
ArkType: TypeScript you can take to runtime
Hey everyone! I've been working on a new approach to type-first validation and would love to get some feedback or answer any questions you have!

By far the most common question I get is "why use this over existing validators like Zod?" so I'll preemptively address it:

- There's a comparison between Zod and ArkType for defining a simple type under "Concision" on our docs site (https://arktype.io). The definition is much shorter and the inference is cleaner and more intuitive. This is not a cherry-picked case. The examples are from Zod's documentation and ArkType's syntax and type hints are highly optimized for clarity.

- Zod recently announced they were deprecating discriminated unions because it was hard to maintain given their architecture. Not only are they supported in arktype, they're supported implicitly- you don't even have to tell us what keys to look at.

- The discriminated unions point is really just a special case of a much more general advantage: arktype is not just a validator- it's a type system. If we can deeply intersect arbitrary types, optimize them, and determine assignability, we can use all of that to make discrimination much easier (being able to "discriminate" is equivalent to having some common path that has an intersection of never)

- Most ArkType definitions are just objects and strings and can be easily serialized and eventually could even be used to validate data across multiple languages. Validators that rely on chaining will never be able to do this.

- Zod claims the following in their docs:

"You can define a recursive schema in Zod, but because of a limitation of TypeScript, their type can't be statically inferred. Instead you'll need to define the type definition manually, and provide it to Zod as a 'type hint'."

They go on to mention:

"passing cyclical data into Zod will cause an infinite loop"

ArkType can directly infer cyclic and recursive types and validate cyclic data.

The point of this is not to say Zod is not a good library. It significantly improved inference capabilities and DX relative to the previous generation of validators like Yup. It also still has some features we haven't yet implemented (primarily stuff like pick and merge as I'm working on adding support for generics).
Plus, we're still on 1.0.8-alpha, so if I needed a validator for my critical production software, I'd probably go with Zod.
That said, I do think arktype has some fundamental advantages that mean in the long term, it's a better approach to invest in.
Almost like a cargo cult
The eSIM is a secure element!

TrustZone is a technology building block, not a complete implementation. You couldn't simply run a SIM on TrustZone, but you probably can use it to implement an eSIM execution environment, which seems to be what Qualcomm is actually doing here.
I understand these are for enterprise. Consumers seem to be stuck at 5TB for portable SSD storage. Does anyone know if I am missing something or if larger SSD drives are planned soon?
Whole Foods in DC has been selling Lions Mane at the grocery store for 7.99 a box ($1 an ounce)

The producer is Smallhold located in NY.
> Does there exist a regex engine I can try that uses derivatives and supports large Unicode classes and purports to be usable for others? :-)

I don't know any besides ocaml-re that Drup already linked, sorry :).

And sorry that my comment is hard to decipher. I think the core point is that the "character set" can be an abstract type from the point of view of the derivation algorithm.
So it doesn't matter how they are represented, nor "how big" a character set is.

With Antimirov's derivative (which produces an NFA), there is no constraint on this type.

With Brzozowski's derivative, you need at least the ability to intersect two character sets. So the type should implement a trait with an intersection function (in Rust syntax, `trait Intersect fn intersect(self, Self) -> Self`). That's necessary for any implementation generating a DFA anyway.

And if you also want to deal with complementation, then a second method `fn negate(self) -> Self` is necessary.
> one can obviously also filter or map in a reduce block

Sure but you can't filter in a map, or map in a filter.
Trick question. It doesn't happen because the driver was watching the road and knew not to blame the pet for a hypothetical crash you just created in your head to prove a point that was MOOT. You want people to have a law that forces them to do something, even though no one is harmed with the care that goes into driving.

I'm sick of people like this using emotional justifications to explain why they need to force more laws down humans throats. Just DRIVE SMART. You don't need to eternally increase laws. They don't work. You have good intentions but you're only betraying all humans for federal top heavy legistlature that only grows. Stop bro. How many things are dangerous in this world? Jumping off your house is dangerous... but that doesn't mean we need to enact a law that forces people to never be able to step on their roof. Fucking get real.

Its the same as guns. Taking them away seems good TO YOU. But it doesn't effectively save anyone, as criminals will get guns either way through their ruthlessness... while innocent civiliians will have theirs taken away. You fundamentally misunderstand the situation. A dog in a car will be going at an average of 36 miles an hour. What happens when you stop in a car? The dog goes forward fast. So does anything else in the car... like a drink.

I'm going to give you a law that says you must have all of your drinks seatbelted in... if you don't have them seatbelted in they could cause an accident! Don't forget to seatbelt your seatbelt... at 75 MPH, that seatbelt might whip around if its not held down safely.... but what about that seatbelt... sounds too dangerous... I would just stay home, mcculley... <Make sure you seatbelt yourself and wear your helmet on your couch, you might fall and hit your head. Lets make it illegal to not have a helmet in your home.

Get a helmet for your dog too... bumping your head hurts and can be dangerous.
I've used an AppleTV almost daily for several years, ever since the first ads appeared in my Roku, and I've never heard of this 'tv guide mode'. A quick google didn't find much, so I'm sure it's got some other strange Apple-branded name. I'll look for it next time.
> In theory, with an eSIM it's even easier to swap in your old SIM because you don't have to deal with the physical SIM card.

But dealing with the physical SIM card is the thing that's easy. People already know how to move a physical thing from A to B. Figuring out how to electronically transfer an electronic SIM is necessarily less easy, even if we lived in a fantasy world where operators all cooperated to try to make it as easy as possible to switch to a competitor (heh).
No, it is not. And nothing about this seems to violate the guidelines [0].
In fact, I'd say fits pretty well with the 'on topic' part of the 'what to submit' section.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
This is what Rust game engines need.

Some sort of sensible scripting language to do the game logic in.
The US Can’t Figure Out How to Prevent Baby Formula Shortages
A repo of all the flag emojis for every country in the world mapped to ISO codes, regions, and continent.
The job description of the CBP has expanded way beyond protection the border and customs. For instance, they were deployed to Portland and have been featured patrolling interior cities under the auspices of catching domestic drug trade. They have become also a domestic police force at the convenience of the executive branch.
I don't understand why politically it doesn't get the attention it deserves

Same as the obesity pandemic, the climate crisis, the biodiversity crisis: there are no clear immediate effects for the general population (consequences of that in turn lead from claims that it's fake to 'yeah sure whatever I don't care doesn't affect me' and everything in between), dealing with it will in the short run cost lots of money, not enough momentum to get anything long term going, sprinkle some lobbyism on top. Sounds cynical, I know, but: I've yet to see this proven wrong.. The wait for the tipping point has started.
The library didn't allow you to see the things (e.g. particular headers or options for those headers) that it didn't know to parse. Ultimately we had to migrate to a different library that didn't restrict us to just what the library knew. The decision not to let us even see things that the library didn't know about is particularly egregious where best practices are changing over time.

In my view it's a very bad design for an http library, although it would have been a lot less frustrating if it had at least provided an escape hatch.
Considering that a bigger engineering and social problem in the Javascript world is the plague of micromodules of dubious provenance, arguing against using solid and trustworthy utility libraries is counterproductive, or even symptomatic.

Using libraries like lodash, instead of adding 12 left-pads of different authors to the dependencies manifest, is an improvement over the status quo.
It isn't technically wrong tbh ^^ A key of our technology is about the mutability of the system
Apple Debuts Yellow iPhone 14 to Boost Interest Until New Model
If you have a valid rx is it still illegal for you to order the overseas drugs?
Not just, but the media [EDIT: and political] component absolutely is.
Cyber Vaccine for Deepfake Immunity
Sceptical investors worry whether advances in AI will make money
Are you aware of any phone (released in the last 10-15 years) where it was possible to exchange faulty components, soldered onto a PCB, in the first place?
I'm all for eliminating management. But kicking out people that have a track record of building things so good that you bought their company is how you end up up with a company that can do engineering but not produce products. Just look at what's become of Google.
Can someone shed some light on the ownership structure of Stable Diffusion?

AFAIK the company getting all the attention and funding (Stability.ai incorporated in the UK) is not the one developing the tech. Development appears to originate at the university in Munich / Heidelberg (see e.g. ommer-lab.com).
I honestly have no idea.

Personally I'm very happy to see that info as I do use both Linux and *BSD and wouldn't have ever tried setting up BSD for audio until now.
> char* and int* pointers had a different internal structure. The assembly generated by the compiler when code accessed a char* pointer was optimized for accessing single bytes and was very different to the code generated for an int* pointer.

But -- they are different. Architectures where they're treated the same are probably the exception. Depending on what you mean by "very different" - most architectures will emit different code for byte access versus word access.
Populace consent is not required history teaches us.
Is a query not a relation?
> The API matters, and readability matters.

Exactly, lodash should be part of the language. https://github.com/mlajtos/es1995
I was comparing it to the quest 2.

>said it was better than the index, and much better than the quest 2.

The Quest 2's optics are much better than the index, both in PPD and in that there is less god rays. There are likely more factors than the optics being considered. Or the OLED black levels are being over valued. How much a person likes the optics is pretty subjective so people are fine to prefer whatever they want.
Where I'm from this was called Repton

edit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxzv1o1ngRw

full screen scroll on a 6502-powered BBC Model B