skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The Pentax 645 was one of my favorite cameras, but years ago I saw that the future was digital. My second consulting contract was for Kodak in late 1990. They were developing a software/hardware platform to support digital media. A few years after that I sold off my medium format cameras (Pentax 645 and RZ67). I like working with direct digital much better. I do wish I still had my beautiful view camera; it was stolen by contractors working on my house :(.

Now, the majority of my photos are family and vacation photos taken on my iPhone.
That is true, but you can combine LLMs with other tools to get sourcing and more accurate answers overall. Instead of using the LLM to directly answer a question, you can use the question to search for relevant text in a particular knowledgebase, and then use the LLM to summarize those results.
For what its worth I don't intend it as a rhetorical method, it really does seem like a disconnect from what I'm familliar with. My experience living in europe is that when I do meet folks from romania/poland/lithuania/estonia etc are viruently anti-russia, and pro eu/nato - almost disconcertingly so. Especially because they see their own governments as corrupt (I can't say whether they are right) and seem to look to these other organisations to save them from that.

I don't know what point that serves, but I do find it difficult to see membership as something imposed on them. If they weren't allowed to join, I don't really know where that would go?
Graph comes from obesity statistics here - https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statisti...

(Aside it’s confusing to post a graph that doesn’t have a title without context)
There is non zero housing being built in CA, but it's way, way below what's needed to make housing anywhere near affordable in urban areas!
great, so a vaccine then? /s
Good. Debian is not perfect for sure, but it's not tied to the interests of a corporation. Also, Snap, which I find useful in a few cases, is entirely optional and not included by design.
Reading about SQL is fun, but trying out live examples is even better! So I created JavaScript widgets that turn static SQL code in articles into interactive examples.

Interactive SQL examples give readers the ability to edit a query and see how the results change. Or even write their own queries.

It works entirely in the browser, without a server (powered by SQLite Wasm), and requires only minimal changes to existing HTML code.

https://github.com/nalgeon/sqlime
Yes, we have 2 years left until everyone in the world (except the super rich who can afford bottled air) will suffocate and die
I am starting to not care at all with the AI search trends. I went through all the hurdles and frustrations to sign up for bing AI. When I finally got access and asked my first question it straight up lied to me. This tech needs another decade in the oven because it is nothing more than a cool toy that pretends to have conversations with you
On Gerrymandering, even the article you cite has a sub-head specifically describing how the Dems are doing it defensively / responsively. You just count the maps and I think you'll find that the Dems should take any gerrymandering-disarmament deal in a heartbeat, because they are losing. They may claw their way back to parity, but you can't level the same accusation.

On voting, more critically, who is trying to pass laws enabling voting, and who is passing laws restricting voting? Ds are trying to get more voting, and Rs are restricting it, restricting times, polling locations, even banning people handing out water in voting queues (which wouldn't exist if they weren't trying to restrict voting. In democracies, voters elect their leaders, in autocracies, the leaders select their voters, which is what Rs are doing.

For the sake of discussion, even if I grant you 100% that NYs actions on gun control are not legal, those will get sorted UNDER THE LAW, and rolled back, and penalized.

Meanwhile I do see Ds doing zero and Rs doing ALL of these pre-authoritarian steps, identical to those in pre-authoritarian Germany 1930s, Chile 1970s, & Hungary & Turkey 2000s:

— Threatening to use the state to jail enemies (Trump from "Lock her up!" chants to most recently at CPAC)

— Infringing 1A free speech, requiring registration of writers

— Actively and pre-emptively denying valid election results

— Infiltrating police departments and the enlisted ranks of the military

— Taking over school boards and local boards of elections

— Banning books

— Burning books

— Firing principals and teachers who defend multiracial, multicultural democracy while banning books that contain such “dangerous” ideas

— Demonizing queer people and outlawing drag shows (again infringing 1A rights)

— Demonizing Jews and blacks

— Actively and completely rewriting history, in particular January 6th

— Gerrymandering states so regardless of how people vote, Republicans control the levers of power

— Changing election laws so they can both make it harder for city-dwellers to vote and to ignore and then change the outcomes of elections they don’t like

— Building media structures that will support the authoritarian takeover when it happens

— Organizing armed paramilitary militias, with back-channel connections to local police

— Creating legal organizations to sanitize and rationalize ending messy democracy

— Spreading antisemitic conspiracy theories about Democrats and Jews using the dog whistle of “George Soros”

— Firebombing Texas Democratic Party’s Austin headquarters and threatening them that if they don’t stop trying to get Democrats elected worse will come

Sorry, a4a4a4, but the Ds are doing exactly zero of this

False equivalency is a lie. What you are doing is called "whataboutism", simply attempting to deflect the conversation from the crimes of your side to avoid accountability and change. Or, perhaps you really are merely fooled. Rethink, because you've got next to nothing convincing.
You can get any user's total karma from their profile. You can get the karma for each of their submissions from the submission's score, which is also public (and the conversion factor is 2:1, I think). Since submissions and comments are the only sources of karma, total comment karma is the difference. Then just divide by number of comments.
Thanks for the question! Our initial focus is more on how to find the most relevant data-points from the hundred gigabytes of data to retrain the model on. Our current data management strategy is pretty primitive, either local files or we connect back to your data warehouse for persistence.

Soon, we plan to add data management features too but primarily on the production side so that data scientists can safely and securely version the data which their AI application came across in production as well as use it to refine their model (if allowed)
Let ChatGPT grade your homepage or landing page and give suggestions for free
There's a lot wrong here, but I just want to point out two things:

> We have very interesting work happening in biology-inspired approaches

You realize that these LLMs are all some variety of neural network right?

> Gradient descent is not intelligence.

It's pretty plausible that your intelligence is derived from gradient-descent prediction, just in analog instead of digital form.
How is this not seen as a massive privacy oversight?
The realpolitik of the thing is that when bad stuff comes out, the value people perceive the perpetrator brings is weighed against the bad stuff. In essence, cost of keeping them vs. cost of marginalizing them.

Some folks were just too valuable to marginalize. Some aren't. But that's pretty true of any space humans operate in, whether the bad stuff is Halloween costume choices or bad hygiene.

If there are a hundred Justin Trudeaus to choose from, the one that was racist gets left by the wayside (I think this is what scares people about this sort of thing... They realize they aren't special enough to step out of line).
An Exploit to the Mind
I have , by accident, came by a very simple yet very efficient way for literally increasing your IQ ,it's an exploit to the mind, should I post it ? or this sounds like a complete sham ?
Because the homebuyers just are the municipality?

And as we're seeing here, if they can't get what they want one way they do it another way.

I've always thought the way out (besides just waiting until a neighborhood is an absolute shithole of a slum and can be redeveloped because poor people have little political power) is just to straight up bribe people. New developments have a "fee" that is directly applied in cash to other homes in the area to reduce property tax.

Everyone likes a good bribe.
Normal web search is doomed. The people creating SEO out of ChatGPT dont realize that I am not going to be searching for answers by reading page upon page of SEO optimized pages anymore. I will ask an AI directly, and of late it has been a god send in terms of code and systems administration. First time right in most simple cases and queries.
So you're saying that both should be investigated and this is really a funding issue? Or you just don't like the whole civil rights thing?
If you are just starting out on your Linux journey, save yourself (possibly many) years of varying woe, and go straight to Debian.
5 over 1 construction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5-over-1

It's awesome, it should be everywhere.
Show HN: A RESTful search engine based on RSS
> If I had exterior cameras, I'd store the data for maybe a week?

Annecdata - but people I know who have cctv around their home store for as long as possible, limited only by the storage size availiable - every motion from a car / person / tree blowing through the trees - years of recordings.

People are selecting 180 days on Ring as the retention period (if they could select longer they probably would), the default is 60 days.
Me too. I use OLED dark mode regardless of display technology but if mumble mumble display technology mumble battery is enough to get designers to see reason, then I’ll take the win.
the best earworm.
6 upvotes and no comments for the single most important story on HN for the year so far.

To quote a poster:

A smiling bee says, "When we go, we're taking you with us!"

The ongoing human-caused insect apocalypse signals that the same is coming for humanity. Most flowering dicotyledonous plants don't make fruits or seeds without pollinating insects.

There goes many human crops. There go the forests that catch and slowly release rainwater to irrigate those crops. There goes much of on-land CO₂ absorbtion and capture. Here comes the big dustbowl, there goes the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, goodbye to every coastal town and city in the world.
> the assumption that the US can "twist others' arms" is not gounded in reality.

It took me this long to realize you've been trolling me. Well played.
Mostly the way we do right now: learn as one goes and pay attention.
Why would one use this over YJIT?
I think they can order you to hand over the files, but not decrypt them first.
I'm the parent of a 12yo as well. My current focus is not about teaching him how to use these new tools, but about making sure he's aware of exactly what they are: how do they work, what are their strengths, and what are their limits. I don't want him taking all the hype that filters down to middle school students at face value.
Blackface is unforgivable for both. Words matter. You'll be fine replacing master/slave with main/secondary.
Minor nitpick: NMEA0183 is a text format (based on "sentences"), it's at the protocol layer, RS-422 is the most common transport layer but we often carry it over UDP or TCP too. SignalK can convert and output your data in NMEA0183 on TCP port 10110, for instance.
Maybe. The problem is that I couldn't control the DNS settings where this code was run, nor could I control what ended up in the search domain. The query did not have the +dnssec flag, but that didn't actually help because Cloudflare wasn't setting NXDOMAIN either way.

This was in golang code, so I ended up switching to `netdns=go` because like all the other libc's, the golang resolving code worked fine.
> It’s very common for evolution to result in redirected drives.

Yes, that's pretty much the point.

And most likely, humans will have a pretty naive understanding of whatever motivates a superintelligent AI.
> ARM

Oh what could have been
Sorting 400 tabs with Rust and GPT3
Are Platform teams the next DevOps? (2022)
Also, this is hardly going to be the deal-breaker for running your software on such systems unless you're expressly writing for them. Pre-standard systems are exotic in ways that are going to break whatever you're trying to do in way more exciting ways!
The books sounds very interesting. I never worked with LlamaIndex and now I'm intrigued by the possibilities!
None of the factors you list are specific to California.
Congrats on the launch, looks like a cool product! Just scanned the docs, so not super sure if my specific use case is supported.

I previously worked on a content recommendation system for academic users. We often wanted to go back and look through specific user sessions to see if the recommendations made sense in the context of their activity. So, ground truth data was kind of available, but only at a later time.

Is this kind of post-hoc analysis in your product scope? Looking at the code examples, it seems like you have to provide ground-truth data at inference time?
Where React usually gets complicated is when non-trivial state gets involved.

Once you have state that needs to span your application and prop-drilling becomes too much of a drag, the misalignment between React's "pretend we're going to redraw everything" and "I'm only changing this one field in my state" causes most of the issues with React.
How are you so confident in your claims?

“The actual intelligence emerges elsewhere “— can you even define intelligence ? And does what an LLM does differ from what humans might do?

I’m not claiming the human brain and an LLM are identical. Rather, I’m pushing back on the confident claims of “LLMs aren’t intelligent or doing anything that’s real intelligence”.
Drift really isn't a problem with audio cards. Latency is. To put things in perspective, it takes sound 1ms to travel 1 foot.

The general consensus is that guitar effects have to have no more than 10ms latency.
Your context is backwards. The context is me not the thing.

You're thinking "Book + Me = Book + Me" but in the context of me it's...

Me + Food = Me with more nutrients.
Me + Book = Me with more knowledge.

In that context, post-consumption, the state of the book becomes irrelevant (destroyed or not, it doesn't matter, I still got what I wanted from it). I absorbed the knowledge (or nutrients). Brought it into my body and made it part of me.
I thought that was more of a white nationalist thing. We've got plenty of neo-nazis running amok in our police forces.
I love all the attention Ruby performance is getting lately!
I've asked three different dentists about it and they all said it actively prevents tooth decay, in so many words. Two of them also mentioned hydration being really good during the same conversation fwiw.
I will give this a shot when it lands, though I wish they were using KDE rather than Gnome. I'm currently playing with Zorin, which I quite like.
>There are errors in humans truth models, yes, but at least they have one. Humans recognize that checking the structure of the text and checking the facts in the text are two different tasks

Asserting that it's "two different tasks" doesn't necessarily make it true.

Humans checking the "structure of the text" stop their check at the text-structure (syntax) layer, whereas humans checking "the facts of the text" also check the validity of what's in the text.

That doesn't mean that the operation they internally perform to do the first task isn't the same as the one for the second task (just with a different goal, so e.g. stopping earlier).

GPT's "checking the structure of the text" happens through the use of weighted connections created after being fed pieces of information.

Human's "checking the structure of the text" also happens through the use of weighted connections created after being fed pieces of information (as encoded in its neurons).

Well, human's "checking of facts" ALSO happens through the use of weighted connections created after being fed pieces of information.

So, why couldn't ChatGPT "checking of facts" exist and work the same way?

At which point is there a necessity for some additional special faculty (and not just e.g. a matter of end-goal setting to calibrate the use of the same capacity of using "weighted connections created after being fed pieces of information")?

We do know that we can ask ChatGPT to check a fact, and it will come with a conclusion about it.

At which point do we need to sprinkle the magical "fact-checking" dust for this to be fact-checking?
>also dislike things like affirmative action, scholarships for minorities, investment/stimulus in poorer areas or other governmental support for poorer people.

In my experience, the "Don't help poor people" and "Don't be racist when supporting people" are not the same group.
I did just peel back the bezel on my Framework here. It looks like those hardware disconnects use some sort of blade that interrupts what I'm assuming to be an optical switch of some sort, one for the mic and one for the camera.
It's actually the opposite.

The issue with this argument is that denser environments are actually able to serve _more_ businesses -- mom-and-pop markets and niche stores are able to survive. Right now I live a 5 minute walk from two separate grocery stores/markets, a 15 minute walk to 5 others, and a 15 minute bike ride to a number of foreign culture (e.g. Indian, Chinese, Hispanic) stores. More than half of these are family-owned. And that's _just_ for groceries.

Every time I visit home in Phoenix I'm reminded of how awful the alternative is: nothing is in walking distance and everything is a corporate big box store. Very few small specialty stores and almost zero family-owned corner stores exist.
You're strawmanning again.

The issue here is everyone knows green energy can't provide enough energy on it's own and yet governments and sjw's every seem to think it's a good idea to pull the rug out of the average middle class person and force them onto green power by taxation, social pressure etc.
Sounds really interesting. Will check it out.
Author mixes two topics, that being searching content they control and content they don’t control.

While understand desire to search content created by yourself, in my opinion vast majority of valuable content is created by others, in part because the most valuable content created by yourself is rapidly internalized into your brain.

Meme of Google is getting worse fails to acknowledge that Google is free and makes money from advertisers. More to the point, more valuable the related search is per amount spent on advertising, the more the noise and as result, more resources user will need to spend to enhance the signal. This has nothing to do with Google and everything to do with value of the information itself.
If you use the LLM to summarize the results, it makes things up by design. As soon as you introduce the LLM into search, you lose.
Carbonated water plus orange or lemon peel is great!
Fungus gnats look like fruit flies, but aren't interested in vinegar or other fruit fly traps. They can also be distinguished by their catlike ability to spring back from a slap with "excuse me, I was flying here, do you mind?" insouciance.

I've had success suppressing them with frequent sprays of neem oil, direct to the soil of the pots. Daily for a week or two to break the life cycle and then weekly or more often to keep the inevitable survivors knocked back and feeling unwelcome.

They're also suckers for a candle left lit in a darkened room.
Right now maybe you wouldn't, very much (though you should profile your code to see which performs better). But having a JIT written in Ruby potentially makes further development on it more accessible to the community. We will see!
Must we always jump straight to the hydraulic press?

Not always. I suppose it depends on your information security case. If your goal is to secure your kids laptop from the average thief that is heading to the pawn shop, maybe "secure erase" of encrypted drives may be sufficient.

If on the other hand one is protecting intellectual property, customer data and so on, then perhaps that average thief was hired by someone with significant resources. I would wager that a percentage of the people reading this comment are using a work laptop and have some IP on their drive that in the wrong hands could cost billions. Even some of the emails I've seen could do significant damages.
> net neutrality is inherently and obviously desirable.

I disagree. The impact of NN regulations on investment decisions by network providers is a key factor in the NN debate.

Market experiments show that broadband regulation substantially impacts network growth – negatively. To highlight a few that originated the NN regulatory process….

- In 2008, the FCC attempted to sanction Comcast for degrading certain peer-to-peer services used by its broadband subscribers, but the attempt was rebuffed by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

- Comcast claimed that it was managing its network to limit congestion and protect the great bulk of its customers from traffic generated by a few. The FCC saw the country's largest cable-system operator as blocking Web videos to stop its customers from cannibalizing the operator's video-on-demand revenues, but no evidence was presented to support this proposition. Managing a network to limit congestion, seeking to protect the majority of customers from traffic generated by a few, if true, would “preserve a free and open Internet,” not undermine it.

- AOL's business structure violated “end-to-end,” and it was criticized as a “walled garden” that stifled consumer choice, application innovation, and Internet development. But the end of integrated ISPs, not only AOL but CompuServe, Prodigy, @Home, and many others, came from unregulated competitive forces as efficiencies rendered by the integrated ISP faded.

- The mobile marketplace disrupted fixed-network dominance, revolutionized economies in the developing world, and brought an array of lifestyle changes that brought enormous improvements in industrial efficiency, public safety, social networking, and health services.

- Traditionally, mobile devices have been tightly tied to a particular mobile network, and customers had to purchase the handset that was associated with the network, and vice versa. Mobile carriers exercised a fair degree of vertical integration, maintaining broad control over the devices and applications that accessed their systems.
New "gardens" both walled and unfenced have recently upended the traditional "walled gardens," and killer wireless applications arose from handset innovations and the platforms organized around them.

NN regulations may suppress anticompetitive conduct, but may also slow infrastructure growth and alter capital flows.

[1] The Fallacy of Net Neutrality
Camera with shutter speed of 1 picosecond sees through dynamic disorder of atoms
British East India Company, probably?

At some point it had more soldiers and controlled a greater subject population than the government of Britain itself.

I'm not sure it was ever consistently profitable, though, which is the main paperclip corporations ostensibly maximize. Which itself speaks to the problem: superficial objective functions don't always determine outcomes or behavior.
Think I heard that $75k figure bandied about when I was in college, and that was over 20 years ago when gas was about $1.25/gallon and $300k got a decent house in a Jersey suburb (or a near-mansion in my part of Central Texas).

So probably somewhere in the $150k-200k/yr range today.
TV+ is close and seems to be following the HBO model. At at a fraction of the cost (currently).

But I agree. HBO is one TV service I don't mind paying annually for.