skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No. They are not. They are still earning less than men:

"the wage gap is smaller for workers ages 25 to 34 than for all workers 16 and older. In 2022, women ages 25 to 34 earned an average of 92 cents for every dollar earned by a man in the same age group – an 8-cent gap. By comparison, the gender pay gap among workers of all ages that year was 18 cents."

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2023/03/01/gender-pay-...
This will do a grand total of nothing to reduce CP, though. It's probably not even going to be an inconvenience. They're already breaking the law and probably jumping through hoops to get access to it.
The standard 6 axis mpu-6050 isn't even expensive. Why skimp there?
Survey-based, it appears, and I'm not seeing what the results look like for men. Which is weird considering the apparent focus of the study, since you can't even begin to draw any conclusions about the role of sex in this, without that point of comparison. Maybe it's in the full study?

(Nb. this doesn't necessarily mean that the proposed reforms aren't a good idea)
Minimal Instruction Set Computers
You seem to agree that if at some point in the next few decades AI will be something we need to worry about, so I'm trying to figure out exactly what it is you oppose.

Would you have opposed research into renewable energy in the 1970s since global warming was still a few decades away from being something we needed to worry about?
Poor people are more likely to make poor choices like unprotected sex, etc and more likely to be religious (no abortion, be fruitful)
Reminds me of the SEGA arcade in Tokyo: https://youtu.be/3I-a5onDg7s
This is a silly distinction. All things being equal most would probably prefer the poverty in modern day America to the "Equal" poverty of preindustrial experience. The real reason people get upset about modern poverty is because it's an example of inequality. So sure, let's try to ameliorate and address inequality where possible. But under no circumstances should we try to do so by reducing total progress and wealth on the planet. Preindustrial poverty is just as much a problem of financial mobility as poverty now is. In fact it's even more a case of that since your immobility is caused by the lack of a position to even move to.u
It's a fundamental element of progress that it will be distributed unequally. I have seen no evidence that you can bypass that. You could eliminate all inequality by reducing everyone to extreme poverty but literally no one actually want's that. You can't eliminate inequality by elevating everyone to extreme wealth, however, because there isn't enough wealth to do so. This leaves eliminating inequality by reducing everyone to some definition of just well-off enough with no option to reach slightly more well-off than that since it would mean they were now unequal.

The most effective solution to poverty is to continue to raise the lower bound as much as you can which alleviates suffering and to remove barriers to forward progress for the individual as that increases everyone's chance to improve themselves and their society a little more.
Is this a problem on the gender axis? Or is it a problem across the board? It's entirely unclear, and it'd be a mistake to conclude that women get penalized [while men do not].

> The survey was sent to contacts in Women of Influence+’s database and was also
shared via social media. The majority of those who received the survey identify as women.

So the study didn't actually measure women specifically? There's no breakdown by gender anywhere in the whitepaper.
I was actually very surprised that the police seem to be actively investigating this. I expected they'd just take my report and file it away.

I think that the reason why they are taking this more seriously, particularly considering my monetary loss was relatively low, is because of the way the break in happened.

It was very violent. The burglar had tried breaking my door open with a crowbar (or similar tool), a power tool that the police think was a saws-all, and when those methods failed, just resorted to kicking the door repeatedly until the doorframe itself broke. I have no idea why he didn't just break a window instead of going to all that effort.

I believe the police interest is not really because of the theft, but because of the method of entry. It was more like a home invasion you see in the movies.

But that's all speculation. The cops tell me nothing, other than this was obviously not a random burglary. I was targeted specifically.

The burglar was covered head to toe, so the video doesn't provide for readily identifying him. But there were other things that the camera incidentally picked up that points a finger to a particular neighbor.

So, for me, the video did something very important: it clearly told me that however this all shakes out, it's too risky to stay where I am and I need to move. That knowledge alone was worth the surveillance system.
I'm going to take commentary about women problems from a website called "women of influence" with the tiniest grain of salt.
> Give it time.

I'm sorry but I still find this hilarious. You can spend over 2k on an iPad that already has a cutting edge M2 CPU, the same CPU family that supports multiple users on every other non-iPad device, we are not waiting on anything here. Everything needed exists and has done so for decades.

Time is not required. A change to how Apple runs its iPad business is needed. This hasn't been a technical choice for a long time.

> yes, hardware is cheap.

You can buy an iPad in configurations up to 2500 dollars. For a single user computer. These are not cheap computers by any reasonable definition, given the amount of compute power you can buy for 1000 dollars elsewhere (including from Apple!).

> potentially - 1 TB home directories for each person.

> ask people with kids how big their photo libraries are and I think you'll be surprised how much the average person is carrying around with them.

Almost no kids have 1 TB iPads in my experience - they are far too expensive for children! Almost no adults have 1tb iPads given their cost as well really - it turns an iPad into a 4 figure device. But perhaps you think 1500 dollars + taxes is "cheap" for a single user computer with 1tb of storage too?

My final point - almost all of their competitors can do this today, often on much lower specification hardware too. Windows 11, Android and ChromeOS tablets all can have multiple user accounts, just like almost any other plain ole computer made in the last 20+ years.
I mean, it’s not just any organization, it’s the anti-gay organization. At least to me, this fits more into the category of “The Vegan Society spying on its employees through restaurant checking and UberEats orders”, which I wouldn’t describe as “spying on vegans (specifically because they’re vegan)”.
Roast This Order Book
Please roast this simple order book implementation
Flux Keyboard
You can’t migrate an expired domain. If you’re still within the redemption period to renew the domain by paying a higher fee, you should choose that (unless you believe nobody else will be interested in that domain name once it becomes available for anyone to purchase).

Once you renew the domain, there is an immediate 60-day (?) period when you cannot transfer the domain elsewhere. So you’d have to wait for that duration and then transfer. You won’t lose out on the expiration date though.

When you transfer the domain to another registrar, you’d have to pay a one year renewal fee, which will extend the ownership of your domain by one more year than what it was before.
Presumably facts that imply politically incorrect statements. The most obvious one would be "despite being x% of the population, [group] commits y% of the crimes".
> when it came to working with real networks. Compare

my understanding is that that no one knows what that SNARK thing was, he built something on the grant, abandoned it shortly after that, and only many years later he and fanboys started using it as foundation of bold claims about his role in the field.
Looked up on MDN (and from there the ES spec), import assertions don't seem to actually be standard. You might want to mark that somehow (or drop it).
Rude. I don't see any reason why such organization shouldn't exist.

I see the different side though. There is a pretty big number of male-dominated industries. And I'm not surprised by the numbers the research found.

My recent conversation with a friend from Google:

- How many women are on your team?

- Not too much

- Oh, but what's the number?

- Zero, there aren't any
Clickbait news sites.
Small warning: 0 temperature still isn't deterministic with openAI endpoints. So, if you are relying on this as an absolute, it'll definitely fail at some point (this bit me at one point recently). If you just like it because it's "mostly deterministic" so it feels more well behaved, then it's fine.

From here: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/completion

> Setting temperature to 0 will make the outputs mostly deterministic, but a small amount of variability may remain.
It's a mocking reference to how people can dislike it when facts that don't match their ideology are presented in a discussion. In this case, someone who wants the focus to be on women might be irritated when facts about men falling behind are presented.
You can today, though we're still narrowing some performance and feature set gaps. There's a downstream distribution of IREE called SHARK that runs Stable Diffusion and other models on AMD GPUs via Vulkan: https://nod.ai/sd-rdna3-ces2023/
Percy Shelley

I like that one.
It’s flickering up and down so I don’t think it was intentionally removed.

Mirror: https://archive.is/w3yZy
How to secure your Remix app routes with Cerbos?
>Palm Tree is monocot, and it is a notable tree

The least tree-like tree ever

>A lot of grasses are dicot

Such as?
Yes.

FAANG is not really a good list, particularly "N" doesn't belong, but these companies have this in common (with the caveat that some of the statements would have to be qualified for some of the firms.)

The strength of these companies (except for the hardware manufacturer) is not based on the strength of their technology or process but they all were leaders at one point in time.

Rather these companies are strong because they are monopolists (mainly because of two-sided markets, except the hardware manufacturer has a lame duck competitor which keeps real competition at bay) and/or are overcapitalized (can buy competitors or subsidize one business on the strength of another business, particularly the web services business that has an online store attached)

These firms are prestigious to work for and pay well because they are highly profitable but the advantages that make them highly profitable are not something you can walk away with. (I'd contrast that to startups I worked at which failed to achieve product-market fit or that got acqui-hired where I got an insider view of the technology and the markets, particularly paths not taken, and the market is either pre-PMF and wide open or is still competitive.)
I guarantee you that unless you are an excellent driver, you'll fare way better in the snow with a normal sized car or even a minivan than with a 4x4. Especially if you are not used to snow.

And you can sleep quite comfortably in a minivan.
The actual study can be found here: https://www.womenofinfluence.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/t...

The methodology was thus:

> The study was planned and carried out between January and February 2023. An online survey,using a mixed-methods approach, was sent out on January 9, 2023, and closed on February 10, 2023. The survey was sent to contacts in Women of Influence+’s database and was also shared via social media. The majority of those who received the survey identify as women. In the end, 4,710 respondents across 103 countries took part in the survey. This paper discusses the data revealed by the survey including the prevalence of TPS for women in the workplace an examination of who is doing the cutting, the effect it has on women both in terms of their psychological health and workplace performance, the resulting impact on company productivity and retention, and the solutions suggested by women on the front lines to manage, mitigate, and eliminate this silent systemic syndrome

Couple of points to highlight from the methodology:

> The survey was sent to contacts in Women of Influence+’s database and was also shared via social media.

> In the end, 4,710 respondents across 103 countries took part in the survey
Note the absence of what the response rate was.

> The majority of those who received the survey identify as women.
Note: No control or comparison group.
Wasn't that right before WhatsApp was bought though? From what I remember they made an effort to implement E2EE before Facebook had any say in it.
> Had he said "not ONLY a statistical engine for pattern matching," I would agree.

I’m not sure I would even then. I mean maybe, but that’s not the clearest, most certain, fundamental difference.

A more clear fundamental difference is ChatGPT instances are all, metaphorically, instinct with no space for intelligence.
They have lots of “training”, but that all happens before they are capable of acting, and once they are capable of acting their behavior is entirely preprogrammed based on a very small input window. They have no memory of experience (that’s simulated, within the token limit, between the model and the user for chatbots), much less a reward mechanism that would let them learn behavior from experience.
Because it will tell you blatantly wrong things. Like the difference in SBus card compatibility between sun4c and sun4m machines is because the sun4m machines have a PCI bus!

Also it doesn't provide links to actual content.

ChatGPT as a search replacement generally increases my time investment.
Debconf's questions, or whiptail, doesn't always work in xterms
What SFTP client do you use in Linux?

The command line isn’t very convenient.
https://archive.ph/w3yZy
F21 Microprocessor Overview
A group of officers all one skin color picking on someone because of skin color are the acts of supremacists. He was singled out because of his skin color.
The WebML working group has kindly invited us to one of their meetings to present about StableHLO a few months ago. Here are the slides and the meeting minutes: https://www.w3.org/2022/11/17-webmachinelearning-minutes.htm....

Also, OpenXLA is one of the external organizations in the Coordination section of the working group charter: https://w3c.github.io/machine-learning-charter/charter.html. We're looking forward to collaborating with WebML folks!
Really like the idea. In fact, I hope there's more of a widespread movement to forgo technology, either for a period of time or more permanently.

That said, can you explain this line -

> If it's on, it's on. If it's off, it's off
Maybe. Copilot is more like an extreme programming experience, where you are still piecing together things yourself in the IDE. Second does all of that for you by building complete features and raising a pull request!

I believe that in the future, A.I. bots will be used to build large chunks of the codebase (like Second). And then human engineers will use A.I. bots in the browser to make low level tweaks and additions (Copilot)
I think it makes sense. They boosted stack overflow because they think it's often relevant, but not necessarily always the best resource. But now it's always #1 when oftentimes there is a clearly better resource. They just wanted it to be #2 instead of #10.

Basically they are wishing the boost feature had room for more nuance.
Unfortunately, until we really need to push high scale manufacturing back to the states, it’s not changing anything for US manufacturing. I worked for a company that took almost a decade just to change from devicenet to ethercat, predictive analytics took 5. Any sort of “smart” system just doesn’t have a huge momentum unless we’re producing items at China rate and need to maintain cost low.
I try to avoid iMessage because when I'm abroad I never know if it's going to fallback on SMS and I'll have to pay for a text
I have used this tool before this announcement (I even wrote a post about using it) and to be honest, it is a really useful one. At least, my main use case is with my non-tech-savvy clients (I work as a freelancer).

Usually they don't know really well how to explain the changes they want to the UI but when I installed this tool in our project, they just used the preview environment to modify it with a visual editor and I got the suggested changes as a pull request automatically.

So, for me, it has been really useful. Kudos for the team!
Namecheap (I want to get off) and DNS Made Easy (I've started to use them with our startup for reliability)
Among other things, caffeine for me (even the amount in a decaf) seems to overall adversely affect sleep, mood, and GI. It can also be bad for some inner ear conditions.

I'm fortunate to be energetic and enthusiastic by default, and don't need to be caffeine-powered on top of that.

The whole coffee aesthetic experience is neat (including nursing one in a cafe, a warm mug cupped hands on a lazy weekend morning, or the image of carrying one as walking to the office on a crisp morning with purpose), but I can find other experiences, and the cravings for the taste of it subside within a couple months of quitting.
The methodology backing this report is garbage.
from tfa:

> Methodology: The study was planned and carried out in 2023. An online survey was sent out to contacts in Women of Influence+’s database and was also shared on social media. Most of those who received the survey identify as women. The survey was sent out on January 9, 2023, and closed on February 10, 2023. In the end, 4,710 respondents took part in the survey across 103 countries.

So scientific! This would be like if the NRA claimed that there actually isn't a gun problem in america because they surveyed their members.
tornado warnings are paid by taxes
they don't have a source. or their claim is that women over 30 are making more than young men (read: have been working for more than a decade than their younger male counterparts).
I'm not saying they shouldn't exist. If their funding depends on a problem existing though, I'm pretty confident that their research will always find that the problem exists and is of high importance. Not many charities are going to go, our research found this isn't really an issue, we're shutting down.

Are there no women on his team because of sexism? or because far fewer women choose to graduate with a CS degree? You are assuming sexism when the answer could simply be a lack of qualified candidates. What if women simply don't like CS at the same rate as men? Only ~22% of CS graduates are women. Or is that sexist to acknowledge that those numbers may drive team makeup at software companies?
In this case certain child protection groups are suggesting that encryption is a hinderance to protecting children in some scenarios. Specifically it allows social media companies a convenient get out in terms of accepting responsibility.

I think there's two ways to interpret that:

a) At face value, in that its boomer mindset popular among the Tory voting base to want to convert the internet back into the pre-internet world and its possible the blues are just genuinely representing these concerns.

b) these child protection groups in years to come will be revealed to have links to MI5, given MI5 is one of the few agencies that the government does tend to listen to. Its worth remembering that the UK used to predominantly communicate using text messages which are sent over clear so the universal adoption of encryption post Snowden revelations has been a thorn in the side of intelligence agencies for many years now.
I'm particularly excited for this too. We're starting to see a lot on the horizon:

* Austral is using linear types for zero-cost memory safety [0] and then allows for borrowing on top of that. Val does something similar called mutable value semantics, which is pretty interesting [3].

* Vale brings borrow checking up to the regions level [1] which gives borrow checking benefits while still allowing mutable aliasing, which makes it much more flexible and ergonomic.

* Cone uses borrow checking on top of any user-specified allocation strategy, such as single ownership, RC, GC, etc. [2]

[0] https://borretti.me/article/introducing-austral

[1] https://verdagon.dev/blog/zero-cost-memory-safety-regions-pa...

[2] https://cone.jondgoodwin.com/

[3] https://github.com/val-lang/val
StableHLO has a serialization format which is based on MLIR bytecode. https://github.com/openxla/stablehlo/blob/main/docs/bytecode... goes into details of reading/writing portable artifacts for StableHLO programs and associated compatibility guarantees.

I'd also like to comment on our (StableHLO's) relationship with related work. StableHLO was a natural choice for the OpenXLA project, because a very similar operation set called HLO powers many of its key components. However, I would also like to give a shout out to related opsets in the ML community, including MIL, ONNX, TFLite, TOSA and WebNN.

Bootstrapping from HLO made a lot of sense to get things going, but that's just a starting point. There are many great ideas out there, and we're looking to evolve StableHLO beyond its roots. For example, we want to provide functionality to represent dynamism, quantization and sparsity, and there's so much to learn from related work.

We'd love to collaborate, and from the StableHLO side we can offer production-grade lowerings from TensorFlow, JAX and PyTorch, as well as compatibility with OpenXLA. Some of these connections in the ML ecosystem have already started growing organically, and we're super excited about that.
Cool! I will check this out! Yea 2023 is going to be an exciting year.
Honda Pilot SUV weighs less than a minivan and has better gas mileage.
I've had an idea I proposed in a meeting ignored, only to be greeted warmly and immediately adopted when proposed later in the exact same meeting... by a woman (and not one higher than me on the "totem pole", either).

I didn't interpret it as sexism, but if I'd been a woman and her a man, I guess I probably would have taken it as not just sexism, but egregious sexism, the kind of blatant crap one can hardly believe exists.

I gather that's actually one of the nasty things about sexism—it's hard to really be sure when what's happening is sexism, versus when it's just ordinary shitty things that happen to everyone.
How like the LLM enthusiast to use a term without care for what it means! Still, GPT itself wouldn't instantly retreat to such vulgar moralism.
It isn't about the organization existing, but about the organization backing research that reinforces the organizations beliefs(which could totally be valid). It's like the sugar industry backing research that says sugar is good for you.
Global warming has been blown way out of proportion. The steep decline in cost of solar panels and wind turbines over the last 10 years is already enough to solve the problem.

Oil will simply be more expensive and that's what will trigger change. People vote with their wallets, only a tiny proportion of the population has the luxury of doing anything but. Foolish to try to appeal to morality when most of the world lives paycheck to paycheck or worse.

On Mars we actually do want to create global warming and a greenhouse effect, so it's good that we know how :D
For reference, here's the current spec...all 833(!) pages of it.

https://www.ecma-international.org/publications-and-standard...
I can come up with list of words that were coined with some intention and gained another. Why a term was created has nothing to do with how it is used and the gp comment wasn't in the context of the cold war history.
You wouldn't have to anymore thanks to this work. You can just install the necessary package now.
I happened to be listening to Fazil Say's variations when I read your comment. I can't recommend them highly enough; they're a delight.
I wonder what the biologic reason behind this is.