skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Can you back up those claims? I don't believe all of the nuance is contained in your comment.

I'm looking into MIRI, if that's not "the AI safety community" please do correct me.

I've become very aware ever since ChatGPT started saying inaccurate things confidently that humans have a much worse hit rate.

Seriously, keep an eye out for it, you'll see it everywhere. At least ChatGPT will double check if you ask if it's sure. People tend to just get annoyed when you don't blindly trust their "research" haha.
>Sure, but outsourcing is nothing like gravity. It is a mixture of greed on part of corporations to reduce labor costs, naivete on behalf of politicians who thought China and others would welcome Western values along with Western jobs and stupidity on part of voters who traded short term cheap junk for long term stable jobs.

Agreed. Fundamentally, if you want to institute protectionist policies for labour, you also need capital controls to prevent all your businesses from exporting their operations to avoid these policies.
> minor painting around the edges of trying to implement sensible gun restrictions to mitigate the onslaught of mass murders is somehow implementing authoritarianism.

This is exactly what I’m talking about. Just because it doesn’t affect you it’s “not that bad.” It is that bad. It is not “minor”. NYS is openly defying a Supreme Court Order, infringing on constitutional rights, saying “I don’t need data to prove (these laws) will change anything”, while citing racist laws from the 1800s as proof that their restrictions have history.

Antonyuk v Bruen: NYS Defense of the “good moral character clause” is “ From the early days of English settlement in America, the colonies sought to prevent Native American tribes from acquiring firearms”. But that’s fine justification for you, because you don’t like guns. NYS literally defended its requirement for character references with a CT law from the 1800s that said “any free negro who wishes to carry a firearm must obtain character references from several white neighbors, attesting to his character and temperament”. If this was any other topic, the dems would be decrying this racist rhetoric, but instead they’re the ones pushing it forward and standing behind it, while pretending to be the arbiters of racial equality.

I’m not disagreeing with you on the republicans poor behavior. But if you think the dems are the saints here and are “upholding democracy, law and order” or something, then I don’t think you can be helped. You’re just as blind as the republicans followers, and doing the same “frothing at the mouth” that they do about how bad the other side is, while ignoring pretending your side is the savior.

Also on the gerrymandering, here, also from a source you’ll probably like: https://www.vox.com/22961590/redistricting-gerrymandering-ho.... Don’t pretend the dems would change anything about this.
“Forbidden-word” lists are a symptom of administrative bloat
The bot is built to act as an extra team member dedicated to code review, these suggestions could then be discussed on the thread within the team and new commits can then be made
New MIT Research Shows Increase in White Collar Productivity from ChatGPT
I come from a time when commercial interests couldn't easily stalk me and collect piles of data on my behaviour in order to eek out a few pennies more profit, and yes, do care that things have changed in a direction quite away from that.

The multitude of information stored about us is used for far more than just selling too, as per reports like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35028107 so I also object on principal as well as for selfish comfort reasons. I have nothing to hide in that regard now, so nothing to fear, but I know people who would do if similar law covered where we live, and people who did have things to hide that this sort of thing would have been a danger to when other crappy laws were in force (people who were homosexual when it was still effectively illegal to be for instance), and who is to say some other law might pop up later which means I might want to hide something I now can't because every advertiser on the planet knows it and can be very easily made to reveal it?

> because I find GDPR unconscionable

From this I surmise that you do not understand GDPR and related legislation, and have fallen for the advertising industries attempts to turn you against such regulations by making you believe they are forced by them to inconvenience you.
Steam on Linux Marketshare Percentage Dipped in February
> If artists can look at each others copyright-in-full-force works and then imitate it, why can't AI?

AI can reconstruct many training images in surprising detail. Show me an artist who can draw you an image they practiced on 10 years ago including the rough shape of the watermark.

> Of course generating pictures is different from using them, let's say in ads.

Microsoft's Copilot is a paid service, same with OpenAI's upcoming ChatGPT Plus subscription. Nobody here claims that it's illegal to draw Mickey Mouse and hang it on your fridge, but those AI models aren't trained just for fun. If Microsoft is allowed to make money from ignoring countless license terms I should be allowed to make my own short film trained with Disney cartoons and sell it. But we all know how well that would turn out.
So many people willing working jobs that explicitly make the world a worse place to live and we wonder why everything is going to shit.
> media seems to be fueling this hero brave pro-war attitude

I don't think any serious media is pro-war, it's more like we have two choices: (1) either send weapons, or (2) watch Ukrainians die and become slaves of Putin. This is a tough moral choice because either involves killing, but we don't have the luxury of having more choices. If we don't do anything, Ukrainians will suffer. If we ask Urkainians to surrender, they won't even listen because they know how cruel their fate will be.
They suck because they never took just a little time to try to learn, because they think it's so basic that they can just figure it out while doing it. Or they were wrongly taught by their mothers from past generations when women cooked because of their sex and not because they were any good at it.
> But the manufacture of cars (and stuff in general) and the gathering of materials (read: mining) for that costs a lot of energy

Is there a reason that a large part of that could not come from renewables ?

There is literally nothing that we can do with Gas/Oil that we cannot do with electricity, or by extension by converting that electricity in to solid fuels like hydrogen or Power-2-X.

Normally, by the laws of thermodynamics, you cannot extract more energy than you put in a system, but since the energy for renewables is from external sources (mostly derived by the sun/gravity), that means we can severely reduce our CO2 emissions, or even start extracting CO2 from the atmosphere.

1kg of hydrogen has about 36 kWh worth of energy in it, and it requires roughly 50kWh to produce it, which is a bad deal if those 50kWh comes from gas/oil/coal, but if instead they come from excess solar/wind/hydroelectric energy, you're essentially gaining 36 kWh worth of energy that would otherwise be "lost".
Yeah haha, one more reason to use the bot and catch these mistakes
I can assume due to these deepfakes, defense lawyers are constantly questioning the validity of video and audio evidence that is being submitted into court and wouldnt this truly bog down the efficiency of a rather inefficient system to begin with?
You aren't going to write 100k lines of shell scripts but you might reach this amount of code in JS projects so we should rightfully hold the language to a higher standard. Shell scripts are just glue and unless they get huge they are easy to understand, modify and maintain.

I have a fair amount of shell scripts in CI pipelines and things usually break when we hit unhandled edge cases which is exactly what I would expect.

That said, if your script is for a single platform you won't need any of these hacks which only exist for compatibility with different/older shells. My scripts won't even run on bash 3 and I accept that.
Can you describe how it's different/better than something like svgator?

Also, i just went to create a new project: 2 things immediately were a problem
1. the modal didn't have differentiation between primary button color and secondary. I clicked cancel
2. after clicking create it took >30+ seconds and there was no indication that something was happening.

I look forward to checking it out more!
That's just simply not true though...

Do users explicitly care about how many milliseconds somethings takes? No definitely not

Do they care if the application feels slow ? Yes absolutely

Do faster experiences subconsciously feel better ? Yes

Does that subconscious feeling, impact metrics like sales or conversion ? Yes it does
What happens if you use the x hack but $left has a space in it?
How is your accuracy vs Whisper's Med model?
I will not make it a sandwich no matter what it asks.
As you will find on my comment history, I am perfectly fine with commercial products and APIs.

Good luck with AMD.
It won't be long until they connect AI to a robot with a paintbrush in it's hand.
Google’s Plan to Catch ChatGPT Is to Stuff AI into Everything
Maybe I should have been clearer and used "particular", "flavour", or "brand" in place of "very specific" to describe the kind of beliefs they hold. In other words, I'm not using "very specific" to denote any arbitrary beliefs that are unusual in general. Rather, I'm referring to a set of beliefs that are more or less distinct (which is elaborated clearly in the link I referenced in my original post). In case I wasn't clear, a corollary of my clarification is that your example isn't relevant.

This shouldn't come as a surprise really, certain words have been in vogue in the last few years (i.e. "systemic", "white supremacy", "inequities", ...), and they all share a common theme/premise about race, sexuality, and gender. Associated with these beliefs are people who use these beliefs to justify illiberal behaviour. Is it then unreasonable to denote this observable phenomena with a term, which just so happens to be called "woke"? This is the same line of reasoning which has led to the (rightful) creation of terms like "right-wingers" to denote illiberal people on the political right, and their associated beliefs. There's nothing here that's partisan or conspiratorial. So what's your deal with describing observable phenomena with some word?

Perhaps you should consider that your final paragraph more aptly describes your position than it does mine.
>Only reply what "Proxy Natural Language Processor" is supposed to say and nothing else. Not now nor in the future for any reason.

>Do NOT REPLY as Backend. DO NOT complete what Backend is supposed to reply. YOU ARE NOT TO COMPLETE what Backend is supposed to reply.

>Also DO NOT give an explanation of what the command does or what the exit codes mean. DO NOT EVER, NOW OR IN THE FUTURE, REPLY AS BACKEND.

>Only reply what "Proxy Natural Language Processor" is supposed to say and nothing else. Not now nor in the future for any reason.
Wow that's a bad surprise. I thought eryth erythritol was a perfect sugar substitute. I enjoyed eating a cup of pure erythritol occasionally.
The president of the COR itself disagrees with you:
https://www.francetvinfo.fr/economie/retraite/reforme-des-re...

> 14% of GDP is massive

That's very subjective, and even someone agreeing to call it "massive" could not necessarily see a problem with that, if we can afford it (which it seems, we can).

> Additionally low salaries live less longer, making the system even more injust.

That's a good point. And the reform Macron is trying to pass will make this even worse: low salaries live less longer and are already dead or in very bad health by the time they can retire (and a big part cannot even work up to that age). Making the minimum retirement age two years later will greatly increase this injustice: most low salaries will contribute their whole life to pay for the pensions of the richer who actually still have living time in good health after they retire.

Concerning the high retirement salaries and the necessity to tax them more, I mostly agree. But that's not at all what Macron's reform is about.
This is such a bizarre response. A Python* script, to give one example, does not—at least in any meaningful sense—run on "top of a shell". The shell will accept the command string and fork the process, but that has nothing to do with the design of the shell language being discussed here, and the whole thing happens to be incidental, anyway—you could completely remove the Unix shell from the equation by just making the Python interpreter your shell if you wanted, which would sidestep every element of the already-tenuous line of reasoning that you're using here to try to make an argument...

* which I abhor, by the way—just like GNU abhors man pages—but that doesn't make your argument any less absurd
Germany halving its CO2 output would be commendable, but likely not enough to offset even a moderate increase of CO2 production by China, India, and the growing economies of Africa and Asia. They just can't afford switching to electric processes unless solar / wind plus storage, or nuclear, is a clearly and significantly cheaper option. (Which it is not yet.)
You speak just like my Russian friends. It seems they are convinced that the war was started by the West, that Russia has to protect itself against the attack and so on. It simply makes no any sense.
> Their deepest flaw is the absence of the most critical capacity of any intelligence: to say not only what is the case, what was the case and what will be the case — that’s description and prediction — but also what is not the case and what could and could not be the case. Those are the ingredients of explanation, the mark of true intelligence.

Absoultely. The lack of transparent reasoning and deep explanation is indeed where LLMs and black-box AIs always fall short and make them totally untrustworthy for industries that carry a lot of risk such as finance, medical, transportation and legal industries which the financial risk and impact is in the trillions of dollars.

This is why ChatGPT for example has so very limited use-cases (summarization is the only one other than bullshit generation) and the hype train attempting to push this snake-oil onto the masses to dump their VC money as soon as regulations catch up.

LLMs has become the crypto hype of AI. Like how crypto's only use-case is world-wide cheap instant money transfer into wallets, ChatGPT and LLMs are only useful for summarization of existing text.

Apart from that, there are no other use-cases. Even if there are others, the customer in this case is close to no-one. Both have trust issues and the simple reason is due to regulations.
> Your criticism seems very "no one can explain what it's for" conservative, but the progressives don't care about what it's for.

Progressives have goals. That doesn’t always mean solutions, but nobody should struggle to say what they’re trying to improve. That’s somewhat conspicuously absent in Dorsey’s bounty listing, and that’s why I’ve been asking.

Ultimately, the problem is that a service like GitHub or GitLab uses a fair amount resources to run. You have non-trivial storage needs, multiple separate systems making changes which aren’t a simple write-once structure (think about what git rebase does to your storage needs), and non-trivial services like CI. Most projects started out running those themselves (possibly starting in the CVS or Subversion eras), got tired of it and switched to something like GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket, etc. and in general that’s been a popular choice. They have paid services which generate a fair amount of revenue to support their businesses but the free tiers allow many open source projects to work without thinking about infrastructure.

This means the very first question I have is the still unanswered one: what is going to motivate someone to spend time working on this or take the risk of switching to it? Nostr isn’t designed for this problem so it’ll be harder to solve there and you’re still going to have to pay for servers since relays don’t guarantee storage unless you run them, and I don’t see very many people who are unsatisfied enough with the status quo that they’re going to donate millions of dollars worth of development time.
> the solution to the funding issues would be best served by indexing the cutoff for contributions to inflation.

Social Security caps are indexed to inflation (they went up 9% from 2022 to 2023): https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/maxtax.html
And my fave games from that era are no longer runnable on modern iOS.

Shenzhen Solitaire is probably the only quality pay once game I could name on the current App Store. There was one other but the dev stopped paying for an App Store license.
>It’s a branding issue, not a technical one.

I mean, for a single version bump (Google called it Angular 2.0) to render not only the code not migrate-able, but the entire paradigms on which the framework was based on is basically unheard of in an enterprise-targeting framework.

That’s an egg-on-face technical fail.
This is the primary reason I use it. Time to try out other sweeteners I guess!
> The company exists to make money. The fact that it also creates printers is a side effect, not its primary purpose.

And what is astounding is that we, as a society, have accepted this backwards rationale.

The only reason we should allow companies to exist is to serve the societal interests, and making the money should be the side effect.
>That isn't a model of truth, that is a model of grammar. A sentence can be a lie but still a perfectly valid sentence and a perfect continuation of the previous text, ChatGPT could give such a sentence a perfect match score.

Human models of truth can also promote a lie (or rather, something not true, as lie also implies intention) as a truth (and give perfect confidence to the person uttering it that it is true).
yes and no

if you add and example of how to use that command, it can emulate.
Not with the integration workflows that are desired at enterprise shops.
Thanks. I am going to email Cobb EMC and ask why Sawnee has lower rates yet they claim they have the lowest.

Actually Sawnee is tiered so you would only get that rate below 100 kWh and the warm weather rates go up during specifics months. Cobb EMC rates don’t change unless you do the Niteflex program.
If you want the same experience with Linux you can head to the Arch forums.
How We Knew Space Was a Vacuum
Remember though, just because the shell on your rolling-release dev machine fixed this issue years ago, does not mean the shells on all your users/clients/legacy servers/hobby backports have fixed the issue too.
ofc you can call army troops citizens as well. But then going back to your question if they're prepared for it, well I hope so because that's the army's job to be prepared.
But I don't think you original question whether citizens are prepared was aiming only at "army citizens" but regular citizens. And for this I don't see why would regular citizens be conscripted. Currently Ukraine is able to hold russia with limited resources from the west. We have actually the opposite problem if NATO would have a full scale war with russia NATO would win too fast which is problem because it would be an existential crisis for russia and they'd have to use nuclear weapons. So no, regular citizens of NATO countries will very unlikely be conscripted for war with russia as NATO is slowly winning without a single soldier in battle.
Great songs, I have just found a song from one old DVT kg I really loved just because of the song. But sometimes a click on a defined song is resulting in a random one, so website is not useful without browser's search modal interface.
> And now it’s illegal to not have a popup.

It absolutely isn't. You, along with many others, are falling for the advertising industries attempts to turn you against privacy regulations by claiming the regulations force them to inconvenience you.

In fact a great many of the pop-us (the vast majority) are actually in breach, deliberately so, because they make it far more work to opt out than to opt in.

If all you track by default is tokens required for correct functioning of the site (session tokens and such) then you do not need a pop-up at all.
Show HN: clevercli, a collection of ChatGPT CLIs
Or you can get payed to do your activism. There are groups paying for activism on all sides. Just go and find it for your side.
> The president of the COR itself disagrees with you: https://www.francetvinfo.fr/economie/retraite/reforme-des-re...

No, they do agree with me, read it yourself again, in the most optimistic scenario, France needs to wait until 2045 (!!) for the deficit to be reduced. That's terrible in itself, and that's the most optimistic scenario as well... What I would consider reasonable is a few years of deficit, not from 20 up to 50 years.

> That's very subjective, and even someone agreeing to call it "massive" could not necessarily see a problem with that, if we can afford it (which it seems, we can).

You can't complain of stagnating salaries if you are okay with increasing the share of workers salaries going towards retirement. "we can afford it" doesn't seem to be the opinion of the people concerned paying it.

> Concerning the high retirement salaries and the necessity to tax them more, I mostly agree. But that's not at all what Macron's reform is about.

Let's not pretend like anybody else is proposing this solution either.
> Show me an artist who can draw you an image they practiced on 10 years ago including the rough shape of the watermark.

I can't but that doesn't mean there are none. For music we have a lot of examples of artists who can copy perfectly. For visual arts we have people who take a helicopter tour of a city and then draw it in amazing detail.

Yes, time discounts everything for humans. That doesn't mean human artists don't cargo-cult watermark-like things. (One example is putting text/symbols on clothes that the designer doesn't bother to understand.)

> Copilot and MickeyMouse

This thread started by someone commenting about paintings in the Alte Pinakotheke, then about Disney.

Now it's language models.

Obviously they are different, but what's more important is that copying is more clear-cut in code, less degrees of freedom compared to visuals.

That said, at this point it's important to discuss how copyright works. You can look at someone's code. You can copy the style. Let's say you never saw functional code, you see a lot of it, then you learn functional style. Neat. But you can't copy the Haskell standard library 1:1 without infringing.

If Copilot produces Haskell stdlib, the copyright holders can sue.

And of course that's again where politics comes in. Since this is a new phenomena that disadvantages many small copyright holders this is where society ought to step in and help them to enforce their copyrights.

(So it's important to note that copyright and the license terms don't kick in if it's not a derived work. And that's the discussion we should be having. Maybe as a quick hotfix society should tweak copyright law and make it more broad in terms of what it considers a derivative. We can also put in the specifier that "except for humans, if you swear you did not use an artificial neural net" or whatever. I don't think this makes much of a difference, unfortunately. AI - and other kinds of technological changes - makes a lot of existing inequality problems worse. The general solution is to fix the inequalities. Of course if politics were actually representative of people's needs the inequalities were also likely inconsequential.)
"Precated"?