skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think that would be more of an issue if terrorism was a spur-of-the-moment crime. Violence on the streets can be completely random (violent people getting angry for no appreciable reason) or without much premeditation (a mugger mugging whomever he sees). In these cases, a police presence would deter a lot of the crime.

A terrorist attack would have to be planned. Anything at all meaningful is going to require explosives: you won't be able to hijack or even severely damage a plane with a knife or even a gun these days. Anybody who goes out of their way, gets explosives and probably has special training isn't going to be stopped by a bunch of ineffectual bureaucrats in silly uniforms. Anybody else isn't going to be much more dangerous on a plane than on the ground, so added security would make little sense.
Swarm of Nano Quadrotors [video]
Please check out http://hockeyapp.net
JavaScript libraries related to different file types.
Meh. Let the people have their fun. They're not taking any real programmer jobs and would just be seeking narcissistic ends somewhere else if it wasn't in tech. At least the heightened attention brings work along with the unnecessary gloating of tech entrepreneurship.
Sure, I've replied there with a comment.
I found two, but they are not worth mentioning. They just copy the graphic elements instead of using the CSS library.
For a WP framework that uses a good CSS library, see xtreme-one (it uses YAML). This match (general CSS lib + wordpress theme) is great, I agree.
Who is an entrepreneur?
Ah, car purchases: the land of endless advice. So let me share my method, requested by nobody:

1) I limit my purchases roughly around to one month's net salary. This keeps me aligned with the idea that I invest in the kind of transportation I enjoy rather than something that's newer and shinier than my neighbours'. My cars are never just boring transportation vehicles: the style and feel of the car is of most importance. However, I'm perfectly happy to drive cars that is ten years old.

2) I intend to keep a car for 5-7 years. I get to pay for routine maintenance and any worn parts for so many times for the $10,000-$20,000 that I could've put into a newer car (and still pay for maintenance and replace parts, just little less of it). I'm not afraid of big rehauls if the car is otherwise sound. There's one exception to the longevity rule two years ago: I changed makes.

3) When I'm changing, I don't particularly shop for cars. I'm rather in the constant "nah, I don't need a new car right now" mode and gradually spend some time browsing used car sites on the internet. When I get interested in one I get this feeling inside. I check a few facts, go check it out, and most of the time just buy it if my hunch keeps going. I think I've never test-driven more than one car, the one I bought. Some I've discarded without a test drive. Contrary to what you might think, I've always had good, reliable cars. And I certainly don't drive the boring Toyota/Honda kind.

4) Facts include such as the ownership records and tax/MOT records, and average mileage. For example, the previous owner of my current car kept it for a steady seven years with full maintenance == good. He kept it as an investment to his transportation needs instead of a cost sink that only gets half the minimum maintenance. Also, if there are several cars of that model that have clocked hundreds of thousands kilometres, I know the engine is capable of doing it without problems.

5) I buy my cars around at 200,000km. If the car is in proper order at that point I know it's not a lemon and has been maintained. Most regularly worn parts have been changed once, maybe twice by the time. The worst cars are those that are being sold around 100,000km or slightly below: you can probably make 100,000km without ever changing oils, not to mention anything else. If so, the car is bust and it won't make it to +200tkm. Anyone who spends the effort to make the car into those figures has had it for some useful purpose.

6) I'm fully aware that I might bump into a bad car eventually. This is where 1) comes into play. The amount of money I spend is over the lifetime of the vehicle instead of up front, so that I can afford to hit an occasional bad one. None encountered so far.

I still haven't spent as much in cars in total and in my whole lifetime than my dad just spent on his latest new car. I've been driving and owning for about 15 years now.
I just installed OpenPhoto on my server, and it works great! Nice work, thanks.
This is a brilliant article. True for the most parts.

However, I think that actual coding that relates to the job in discussion is important. This doesn't contradicts the idea in the article though.
Foundation uses <br />s with its form fields (eg. <input><br />, etc), which just makes it annoying to style if you want to style anything ever so slightly out of the box Zurb puts you in.
First of all, let me start with the disclaimer that no summary substitutes for reading the licenses in question. The MIT and BSD licenses require almost no effort to understand. The GPL (v2 or v3) makes for fairly easy reading, and seems intentionally written in a way that non-lawyers can easily understand and apply. The same mostly goes for the LGPL and Apache licenses, though the use cases for the latter don't become immediately evident at first glance.

For a quick overview of the most popular licenses, I really like this diagram: http://paulmillr.com/posts/simple-description-of-popular-sof...

That diagram rather effectively captures the most important differences between the licenses: copyleft of various strengths (GPL versus LGPL versus BSD/MIT), the added protections in the GPLv3 and LGPLv3 versus the v2 licenses, the rationale for the Apache license rather than MIT/BSD, and the subtle difference between BSD3 and BSD2 that you mostly don't need to care about.

If you want a more extensive analysis, I'd suggest reading the FSF's license list, which provides a rather comprehensive list, including specific issues with various licenses, and links to more information about common license features: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html

One critically important disclaimer about that list: ignore everything it says about the GFDL (GNU "Free" Documentation License) and stay far away from that license. Always license your documentation under the same license as your code; don't use a separate, incompatible license.

You may also find the rather extensive and provocatively titled essay "Make your Open Source Software GPL-Compatible or Else" useful: http://web.archive.org/web/20110718154125/http://www.dwheele... . (Link to the Internet Archive because dwheeler.com seems down at the moment.)

Hope that helps.
Espadrilles are available in different styles
Espadrilles are available in various styles, however the most famous among people are the ones which do not have any laces and a wedge shaped heel. Because of this fame of wedge heeled espadrilles, they are a few times considered by the people as women's shoes.This actually is a misconception since Espadrilles were actually unisex shoes and this is supported by the historical facts.
nudity that would be unacceptable in a public museum where minors visit

That has got be one of the most stupid 'clarifications' I've ever seen in an EULA. Have these people ever been to a museum? Think of just about any act or scene that is "obscene, pornographic, indecent, lewd, sexually suggestive" and I can guarantee you I can find a photo, painting or sculpture depicting more or less just that hanging proudly on display in some "public museum where minors visit".
FWIW, the iOS5 based Storyboard has been helpful to get around some of the issues you mentioned; we just finished an app, granted with a very limited number of screens, but Storyboard was a time save for sure. Details, here:
http://blog.fieldforceapp.com/weekend-project-ios5-storyboar...
Bootstrap is not overused; just under customized.

In all fairness, what this proves is that there is a fairly large market for such packaged customization themes which are built thoughtfully and work on all resolutions.
It's a framework - use it as such
For me, the only way to meaningfully assign meaning to a program being "beautiful" or "elegant", is to interpret it as the program possessing a significant part of all the possible pragmatic advantages a computer program can possess, so on the highest level: being easy to understand, extend and debug. Those easily translate to more concrete properties: strong correspondence between the abstract concepts of the program and the domain it represents, following established coding standards, making functions/methods data-driven where possible, signalizing errors in a meaningful way an so on. There are lots of programs with more then 200 lines that meet a very high standard of elegance understood in this way (v8, sqlite). If your program isn't elegant in this way, there is a real cost for both the users and the business owners, this isn't just some abstract game. I guess you wouldn't like to drive a car where the cables and pipes form a completely unreasonable mess, just because it happens to work at this particular moment of time. If your program is a mess, it will end up having more bugs, features will take longer to develop, it will most probably work slower and so on and so forth.

The article implicitly assumes that pure functional programming contributes positively to elegance, and since it doesn't define "elegance", it's hard to argue with it. I don't think however there is a strong consensus in the programming community that pure functional programming contributes positively to "elegance" understood as defined above, and this is to me the fundamental flaw of this article.
I miss radio in Australia a lot now that I'm in Japan - the stations here are terrible (at least in the daytime)..

Adelaide, where I used to live, has only a population of 1.2 million and had three(!) quite active community stations (subscribers pay a good deal of the cost + a little advertizing, the shows are staffed by volunteers..)

http://radio.adelaide.edu.au/ http://www.threedradio.com/
http://fresh927.com.au/
Just as "the best writing is re-writing", the best coding is re-coding or re-factoring. I find that to get things in a workable and maintainable state, I need to write something about 3 times. The first pass is usually a hack that fixes the problem at hand. The second pass is used for a little bit of code cleanup and fixing corner test-cases. The third pass is the major re-factor such that the code is maintainable and fits in with the rest of the software design.

Having worked with extremely large code bases, I can say that the practice of re-factoring goes a long way. The initial time investment seems excessive, but it pays significant long-term dividends when it comes to maintenance. Not only is it easier to extend the solution but also fix bugs and supply patches. Furthermore, clean code (not just syntactically) is easier to understand by others.

Writing clean code is possible, it just takes a bit of discipline to go back and re-write. I've only worked with a handful of people who did this, but their code was the most elegant I've seen, easy to work with, and widely applicable.
Netflix on github
If FFI is loadable, how are you going to prevent your untrusted script from loading it and going to town? How are you going to avoid providing "direct access?" My whole point is that I don't think you can. It's all or nothing. If ffi is available to some Lua code, it is available to all of it.

I even asked Mike Paul (LuaJIT author this question, and he said "That's not a viable approach for sandboxing.") http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2011-02/msg01582.html
KEXP pretty much fits the bill. http://www.kexp.org/
Maid Service Houston
Maid services in Houston tx, house cleaning services houston house cleaning houston, maid services houston.Maid Service Houston TX, Housekeeping Houston, House Cleaning Houston, house cleaning houston, maid services houston
How to download file free as a premium user.
The manager buys everyone in my sister's department seized leathermen for Christmas.
It is a place of business if it meets the definition, and there can be more than one.

The definition is somewhat ambiguous, but it is likely that if there is an actual physical place (even if it is just a server) used to offer goods or services for sale to the public, there is a good chance that those sales are attributable to that server, and will be taxed in the country that server is located in.

This might not be a problem for an established corporation with the sales volume to justify the tax accountant expenditure and payment overhead needed to comply with tax law in multiple countries, but for a bootstrapped startup it can be an important consideration.
I've found the best use for Bootstrap is internal sites and tools. The public never sees these tools so they are usually stuck with terrible UI and UX. Bootstrap makes these tools so much easier to write.
Christian Louboutin Daffodil 160 Pumps (Aurora Boreale)
Thanks for enlightening me. Welch's tenure ended in 2001, by which time 40% of GE's revenues were from GE Capital, who were actively engaged in derivatives markets and had large exposures that would have gone bad even if they hadn't levered up from 2002 to 2006.

There are many other criticisms of Welch's tenure that come to the conclusion that GE did well DESPITE Jack Welch, not because of him.
Here is a tasty link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Welch#Criticism

At any rate, I personally think that CEOs are figureheads of companies and the only things about a CEO that makes any difference is
a) how good a head of hair they have
b) how tall they are
c) which ivy league school they attended and if they shared a class with anyone now at Goldman Sachs

At least he was a Chemist, and not one of those idiot Physicists ;)
Will Facebook deliver an IPO surprise?
Git and PowerShell - Neat
Would some sort of distance score be more efficient though?
No, I wouldn't. I feel there is no monetary value in Facebook. Okay so they sell ad's and harvest lots of data. Big whoop. From what I noticed people who visit Facebook do so because they simply want to communicate with their friends or people they know. Not look at ad's.

<rant>
The reason Google's model works is people go there to look for stuff. because it shows me what I want with little to no effort. And it keeps getting better! For example. Last week me and the CEO wondered about Superbowl Sunday. "Just type in Superbowl 2012" I say. BAM! There is was, the first line in the SERP's was the date of the Superbowl.

I believe the popularity of the site has been exaggerated to the point where investors have given it lots of money because of it's global use. This only worsens the problem and increases the false belief that Facebook is worth billions. Take a look at the stats http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics with that many people visiting surely it must be worth something...

"More than 350 million active users currently access Facebook through their mobile devices"

I can tell you that more than half of these users only do it to see what their friends are up to or see pictures and comments from friends. Because Facebook does not give you a way to do it via email. This is no accident. They would make no money on ad's if they did.

Want to see which photo your friend liked? Sorry you must login.
Want to see that comment on your status? Sorry you must login.
Want to click that link in the Android app? "Here, I'll open the browser for you so we can get you logged in. -Facebook"

Wow, look how many people are visiting Facebook. You should invest!!

How many of us actually are influenced by Ad's on Facebook?
How many of us actually click Ad's on Facebook?
How many of us BLOCK Ad's?

We visit Facebook to socialize not to look for stuff.

Eventually this bubble will burst... showing me ad's when all I want to do is chat and share media with friends is pointless. This isn't a viable business model. Now If Facebook starts their own search engine...I would definitely think about it. For some FB is where the internet starts and ends.
This would definitely increase the value of Facebook and maximize their advertising potential.

</rant>
Just curious, but your age ranges are 8 years, 17 years, 14 years, and Unknown. How did you come by those buckets? I can't figure out the intended distinction between each group.
To Know Historic Beauty around Kakinada
Kakinada is a notable place with its rich and varied places of tourist attraction as it has a wonderful blend of nature as well as heritage. It is a place of rich tradition, breathtaking natural beauty, historical significance, holy pilgrimage center, beautiful virgin beaches, hillocks, stunning landscapes, soothing rivers, amidst picturesque setting.
Acer Aspire 2930Z 322G25Mn battery
4400mAh Acer Aspire 2930Z-322G25Mn battery is specifically designed for Acer Aspire 2930Z-322G25Mn laptop. We offer a complete line of replacement Dell batteries and compatible replacements for almost all laptop models. All of our replacement Acer Aspire 2930Z-322G25Mn laptop batteries are made with high quality safe parts and are guaranteed to meet or even exceed the original manufacturers specifications.
LOL

As if Apple is the root of all problems.
As if Foxconn only manufacture products from Apple.
As if people are FORCED to work in those conditions.
As if they DONT have a choice of not working there.

And i am sorry peeps, what happen if Apple suddenly decide to double pay Foxconn? What happens if EVERYONE double pay them? Would those people get double their salary?

And it is great that Foxconn are now considering using Advance robotics instead, more people Jobless, more people suffer.

Oh, and i forgot, American has once been through this stage as well, and looking from the web it is obvious they dont teach history there.
Swedish Videoplaza secures $12 million for global expansion
So far I have bank accounts in Austria and Germany and in both countries transfers to any other bank within the EU are completely free (and I don't have to pay any monthly fee for the bank accounts either).

The user interface is also quite OK for those banks. Just enter the transaction information on the Web site and confirm the security code sent to you via short message.
Lamson isn't an open source alternative to mailgun and sendgrid per se, it's an open source alternative to writing your own library for email.

With that said, specific functionality is more a question of learning lamson, and tying in libraries that do do what you want, or finding someone that already has on Github.

For your use case, you would be tying together and implementing bits and pieces of this yourself. Part of the reason for Lamson existing is to enable programmers to solve their own problems with a common sensical base to work off of.

It's more of an equivalent to a web framework than a CMS.

If that isn't workable, you'll have to either hire somebody familiar with Lamson to hack it up for you, or you'll be at the mercy of existing plugins to tie an MTA into MongoDB. (Doesn't exist).

Do you have a more specific question for me to address? The answer to pretty much everything you brought up is "Cool, so go make it". The point of Lamson being the way it is, is so that you're not limited by the creator's intentions, just by your programming ability.
نتيجة الشهادة الاعدادية 2012 بالاسم ورقم الجلوس
Cestovní pojištění | cestovní připojištění | pojištění na dovolenou
Cestovní pojištění - Získejte nabídku a sjednejte si Vaše cestovní pojištění & pojištění na dovolenou se společností Travel Guard, včetně ročního cestovního pojištění, cestovního pojištění pro seniory a mnoho dalších produktů. Získejte výhodné cestovní pojištění nyní.
Colorado Public Radio started Open Air, which is a radio station focusing on new and recent music. You should check it out. Unfortunately while it streams online, offline it is just an am radio station, so I haven't listened to it much because of the poor reception.

http://www.openaircpr.org/
Ask HN: how can a backend coder learn to be a front end designer?
any good ways/suggestions/sites?
as a backend coder, my sites are usually ugly and un friendly to users, I want to improve. could you help advise? thx.
On the topic of the responsive design module - when I view my project on an iPhone/iPad it shows the full screen version of the site, rather than the mobile version. However, it shows the mobile version on a samsung phone.

Is there a reason for this?
Shadow DOM, Pointer Lock and a new CSS Lexer
But Chinese don't want to do that because they are evil.

No idea what you're talking about with that line.

This isn't simply about pay. It's about terrible working conditions. It's about the fact that Steve Jobs told Obama that his products could never be produced in the US because, apparently, his products require horrible working conditions in order to be produced.

Frankly, I could care less what they get paid, so long as it's a livable wage in their region. What I care about is that employees are not stuck doing the exact same thing, day in and day out, until they're maimed by machinery or repetitive stress injuries. I care that people have a way to air their grievances without fear of blacklisting.

8000 high wages engineering jobs has been moved to China

They have? The 8,000 I read about were assembly line workers, not engineers.

As for moving jobs overseas, I take issue with Apple claiming that they have to due to a lack of manufacturing facilities when they have $100 billion in the bank.
On the topic of what people find interesting on HN, I think that's a bit different discussion than whether elegant code is practical. Not every article on HN is even intended to focus on shipping software or "creating value". Lots of people are interested in computation as a scientific and hackerly topic, and not everything within that sphere has purely utilitarian ends; lots of "here's a clever algorithm" type pieces are just intended to highlight some point of how computation works, not suggest that you implement this algorithm in your shipping product. You might as well demand that every physics article have a section justifying how it increases business value.
...who's gonna edit,

The editors, most of whom are minimally paid and do it for prestige. I.e., the same people who currently do it.

...who's gonna edit,

Unpaid referees/editors, the same people who currently do it.

...typeset...

Authors, the same people who currently do it:

\usepackage{freejournal}

...and print them?

Readers, the same people who currently do it. Or are you imagining that there is some pressing need for physical journals to be printed and delivered to libraries?
Neither of the examples fit in its frame.
Well, to be fair, the "comfort zone" of the movie makers in particular is "If you copy this movie, we will sic the FBI on you to the tune of $LOTS and enforce SEVERE CRIMINAL PENALTIES"

No kidding, I'm sure you've seen this hundreds of times, every time you watch a DVD. It really says that.

The MPAA has gotten the highest law enforcement organization in the land, the FBI, to chase down the criminals who...wait for it...

wait for it...

wait...

...

.

.

.

share.

It has become a crime to share.

Do you see how this might be a problem? People know it is within their natural rights to share. And when the authorities say "no sharing", they may get away with it for a while, but eventually people will come to realize that the laws are being made by people who would like to squander scarce law enforcement resources, resources that should be spent on protecting the people, on reinforcing the tyranny of copyright law and prosecuting people who share.
"Just don't look 100% like a vanilla bootstrap site."

Unless you're targeting developers or Silicon Valley who cares? Most people couldn't tell you the difference between a Bootstrap site or a non-bootstrap site, even if they could its unlikely they would actually care. As a dev who admittedly sucks at CSS I'll take better looking and clone-like (and cross-browser) over ugly and unique any day.