skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Don’t you think the amount of remote work has changed that?

I think part of the problem is the presumed loss aversion of moving from a $300k salary to, say, a $175k one that is remote but allows for a better standard of living (particularly for families).
i aint givin up mah slaves
I strongly suspect that this is not a difference in internal experience so much as it is a difference in expectation, just as with aphantasia (the inability to imagine).

Imagine a bicycle.

How many sections does it have? Where do the pedals connect? Which bar supports the seat? What color is it? What shape of handles does it have? What kind of tires? Does it have lights? Does it have luggage rack?

Some people look at their internal version of a bicycle and say "oh, I must have aphantasia. I think of a bicycle and a photograph of a bicycle doesn't appear in my mind."

Other people are perfectly satisfied with the blurry sort-of bicycle that they imagined until you start asking about specifics.

I think the inner monologue question is similar.

The inner monologue is a ((set of echoes)(set of impressions)(series of words)) that move back and forth ((in time) (in your mind))(((competing for expression) (attempting to be expressed) (expressed only to you (to your internal ear))) in bits and pieces that you can ((experience)(hear)(perceive)(decide to treat) as) a coherent whole.

Sometimes it feels like a book unspooling, sometimes it feels like the paragraph I just wrote.

When a person compares their internal talk to the internal talk in a movie, sometimes the person feels the movie is accurate, sometimes the person feels the movie is inaccurate, but the actual internal experience is probably very similar in both cases.

What differs is the person's expectations of an "internal conversation." If you expect it to sound like a voiceover you will be disappointed and you will think "everybody else must be different from me".

That's not (I suspect) the case. I think we mostly just have different ideas of how to process our fictional abstractions of the concept.
Actually I think that is more of an issue with Google's MBA and Product/Project manager culture than rewarding algorithm/CS specialists
The spatial resolution of the current state of the art satellite images have pixels the size of a person's head. They're taking photos from a very, very long way away.

And even if they resolved that particular problem, most people would struggle to recognise most other people by looking only at the top of their head and shoulders from almost directly above...
I consider myself a "skilled admin", yet I don't feel like I have to do much to keep a WordPress instance running. Now it even updates itself. I often just install WP, a theme, and maybe one or two plugins, and then it runs without issues forever.
You have seen Ferraris on the road, despite not knowing someone who owns one.

There will always be a subgroup of people that will pay for social media, either because their work pays for it or because it is crucial enough for personal reasons.

I am happy to pay for social media if there is zero tracking and zero advertising. However, so far advertising is way too lucrative, so this won't happen.
If I don't realize how shit it is, I don't think it's a shit experience. I don't care how it was designed and what you call a "byzantine hack" I call a feature that saved the Internet about 20-25 years ago. Having everyone on a public addressable host is not good. (Yes, I know you can do this on IPv6, but then it's like you're just applying Byzantine hacks to get the security feature you already had on IPv4.)
Neuro-comp and individual biases in action-outcome learning under moral conflict
Archive [1]

[1] - https://archive.ph/q3LPC
"NOVA classification system" by Monteiro et al's description of ultra-processed food is more or less exactly what I've described:

> A singular feature of NOVA is its identification of ultra-processed food and drink products. These are not modified foods, but formulations mostly of cheap industrial sources of dietary energy and nutrients plus additives, using a series of processes (hence ‘ultra-processed’). All together, they are energy-dense, high in unhealthy types of fat, refined starches, free sugars and salt, and poor sources of protein, dietary fibre and micronutrients. Ultra-processed products are made to be hyper-palatable and attractive, with long shelf-life, and able to be consumed anywhere, any time.

Previously we would just call this "junk food" rather than make some insinuation about "processing," which is still undefined and without meaning.
> Many devices don't support it is probably one I consider true though. It's getting way better as the years go on but it's fair to say the world isn't past IPv4 only devices in households by any measure. Typically embedded products are the worst. Home security stuff, point of sale gear, older or just crappy media devices, oddly some IoT type devices like a fridge. Plenty of gear also supports it but just very poorly. Of those that do not all understand NAT64 either so while they may support IPv6 but they don't necessarily work without IPv4 (this also getting better as more services move to supporting IPv6 too).

This is very much the case. I used to compile statistics about various devices for our network gateway. ipv6 support was very hit or miss and was the root cause of many spurious support tickets.
None of my motivation comes from doing a good job as defined as "increasing company profit."

I care about two things:

1. My own pile of cash. I will work until I die, as I like the technical puzzles. But I also want the ability to casually walk away at any time.

2. The technical puzzles. I care about the code and doing fun things with it. Whether it goes to prod? I do not care. Whether it brings in new revenue? I do not care. I will push interesting new tech I want to learn and find some reason to make a case for it, even if it is not a sincere case.
No, the absurdly poor migration path to IPv6 is costing the tech community as a whole.
I'm not arguing any such thing, just pointing to the strengths of the two standards.
I don't have to click them in the US (yet), so clearly not.
Ignoring reality doesn't change it.

Taiwan have limited and then banned mainland tourists for a while now. Chinese have zero freedom of movement in Taiwan.

China asserts zero power, politically, judicially, executive, over Taiwan. Get over it.
I remember the early Internet, before NAT. Everyone had public IPs everywhere. Most universities had public IPs on the desktop (and dorm room.) My home network was a /24 with no NAT. NAT was supposed to be the exception, not the rule.
You keep quoting this, seemingly without reading it:

From the "Six Assurances" mentioned right there:

> The United States would not formally recognize Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan.

Additionally, the "Taiwan Relations Act" (again mentioned right there) says:

> The act authorizes de facto diplomatic relations with the governing authorities by giving special powers to the AIT to the level that it is the de facto embassy, and states that any international agreements made between the ROC and U.S. before 1979 are still valid unless otherwise terminated.

(noting the that Postdam treaty you mention elsewhere was made with the ROC government because it was in 1945)

> The TRA provides for Taiwan to be treated under U.S. laws the same as "foreign countries, nations, states, governments, or similar entities", thus treating Taiwan as a sub-sovereign foreign state equivalent. The act provides that for most practical purposes of the U.S. government, the absence of diplomatic relations and recognition will have no effect.

See:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Assurances

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Relations_Act
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra-processed_food#NOVA_food...

https://educhange.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/NOVA-Classi...

It's a classification system promoted by a single research group in Brazil (Monteiro et al).
I agree with this, but I really think the rationale for surveillance legislation like this is "all of the above." Some stakeholders are only interested in protecting marine resources, but others are in fact focused on identifying anglers who are poaching. See https://globalfishingwatch.org.

I have been on salmon charters in Alaska and Canada, and it is surprisingly easy for even a well-intentioned skipper to drift out of a legal fishing zone while tending to everything else happening on the boat. I'm not excusing those mistakes, but I can definitely understand their reluctance to carry surveillance units onboard.

It's a tough problem; all parties have strong arguments, but the interests aren't aligned. I do think there are some actionable areas most folks would agree on, like investing in measures to deincentivize rogue international fishing operations and bottom trawlers/dredgers.
I think of all the people who have/might ditch an external author, the specific OP here has the best use case.

UX/UI designers are definitely #1 among the people who should use computers in a way closer to their target audience.

But also using a tiling window manager makes using a tiny single monitor extremely effective.

1. There is almost no wasted space. Almost the entire space is used for your content. It maximizes screen space better than any other paradigm there.

2. Automatic and effective filing meant I was far more likely to open windows besides each other much more rapidly (and way more conveniently) than I could arrange windows between monitors.

3. I haven’t used DWM, but i3 instead, and it was the only software where multiple desktops actually felt almost as effective as having actual multiple windows.

The low graphical requirements of tiling window managers (I’m pretty sure their rendering is way faster because the display is so much simpler) meant that they could render a new workspace faster than I could turn my head from 1 monitor to another, and easy KB shortcuts made it ridiculously easy to switch between desktops.

Let’s say I was copying 1 document’s text manually to another, it was probably quicker for me to type, hit Alt+2 read what I needed to copy next, hit Alt+1 to go back to the writing workspace and continue typing, than it was for me to type, turn my head to the other monitor, read, and then turn my head back to the 1st monitor to continue typing.
Using a chat with ChatGPT to write an article about my productivity idea
The reality of the situation is that UN recognizes Taiwan as being part of China and so does US in black and white on the state department page. The whole deliberate ambiguity policy has no actual legal standing, it's just US pretending that it has a right to meddle in internal affairs of China.
I'm not going to go off on a tangent on a discussion on Taiwan, but I don't believe none of your assertions is grounded on reality. Ukraine is doing magnificently on the battlefield, specially given Russia planned their invasion to be a 3-day event with frontline soldiers packing parade uniforms and riot gear and Russian generals booking restaurants in Kiev in advance.

To attest to Ukraine's prowess, Russia's ruling regime is now afraid their defeat spells the collapse of Russia and consequently it's fragmentation.

In the meantime, the west already lined up a massive plan to rebuild Ukraine, not to mention it's already in the process of joining the EU. There are countries who had a far less favourable postwar setting which rebounded quite well.

If Taiwan has any lesson to take from Ukraine, that lesson is that fighting for its independence pays off.
A common saying that ... invalidates itself?
What's wrong with scientist as a career?
Hell, pockets of New Mexico have a higher number of PhDs per capita. The idea that SV is the intellectual center of the universe makes it sound like someone has been inside the bubble too long.

(And that’s not a knock on NM. I being it up as an example of an area that isn’t rarely bright up in these conversational circles)
Well, I'd get rid of the word "unfair" - that's not actually true.

But putting that aside, I would guess that maybe you're in a very large company? I think the more siloed and specific your role is, the less helpful this sort of thing would be. I work at a ~20 person startup, and an engineer who can think with a product mindset, talk directly to customers and write good user-facing documentation is much more valuable than someone who can just write code to spec. At a 20,000 person company, that's likely not the case.
We have processes in place, although a Louisiana court just ruled the main one unconstitutional, mainly on privacy grounds...
Western Europe, Taiwan, and South Korea and now all wealthy democracies thanks in a large part to US assistance.

It hasn't been successful every time the US has gone to a country's aid, but some countries just can't be helped.
SF is in the grips of something between Mad Max and Night of the Living Dead. It's far worse that what you hear about on the news.
Most systems aren't using EUI64. Within a subnet, they're using random addresses per RFC 4941. So, if I've got a /64 IPv6 allocation (which I do right now), that means I've got 64 bits of randomness to play with. Right now, my macOS system has four publicly-routable IPv6 IPs, all of which were randomly-generated, and which regularly regenerate.

I did not have to do anything to get this. My macOS system has IPv6 set to Automatic. My home ASUS router picks up the /64 allocation from my ISP, passes the info on to things on the LAN, and acts as a firewall for IPv6 (while continuing to act as a NAT for IPv4).

According to https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/deploy360/2014/pri..., this has been common for some time.
It took a while, but it's gotten pretty good again. Harder to get plugins running than it used to be, but now there's Slack, Matrix, Teams, and (shameless plug) GroupMe[1]. Works well enough for me these days :)

1: https://github.com/djhaskin987/groupme-purple . Kudos to its original author, Alyssa Rosenzweig :)
My issue with Roku is that advertising makes it a bad product.
What's ironic is that the IPv6 people will tell you you can do all of that with IPv6. Which is true, but if we NEED TO CHANGE because we're out of addresses then why go to something that doesn't use the address space?

The problem IPv6 seeks to address has mostly been engineered around for now.
Vulkan trails on some things, leads on others. DirectX doesn't exist on mobile for instance, so innovations with particular relevance to mobile GPUs tend to come to Vulkan first.

Also, its extensions make it an interesting laboratory for various vendors' experiments.
> You detonate one over open waters and tell China to back down.

Then China detonates ten over open waters, and tells "you" to back down and not go there.

The magic deterrent value of nukes (mutually assured destruction) doesn't work if one side can't assure destruction of the other. Even if Taiwan can manage such a show of nuclear force, China can (credibly) threaten to annihilate it if it attacks, but the reverse isn't true.
It's from the UK.

Finland does hats and swords for PhDs though.
I just returned from Taiwan and to be frank Cross-Strait relations and escalation seems to take up little real estate in the public psyche, I would estimate about as much as it does in the United States if not less. The news cycle is more likely to be filled with stories of scooter crashes or the war in Ukraine than any perceived deterioration in relations with PRC.
I always find the wording of these discoveries interesting where a certain thing started at a particular time, instead of by a particular time. The difference might seem small but I think using "by" better conveys some temporal distance of ramp-up to that technology could be considered, wherease "started at" seems quite abrupt.
I also use CapRover. The initial setup was harder than I expected and there definitely is some learning curve and learning how to package your own apps or how to even make some of the pre-made apps to work (it doesn't really work out of the box). Once you get used to it though, it makes it really easy to add new applications and put them live. If I have an idea for a website, I can just click new WordPress instance, point the domain and done. If I want to also add a forum for that website, I just click new Disqus instance.
None of this has an actual meaning under international law. The legal standing of Taiwan is that it's part of China. Plain and simple.
Are there more than two sexes?
Worth pointing out that this is a common problem with humans.

David Chapman calls it “moral inversion”: https://buddhism-for-vampires.com/black-magic-transformation

And the LW article above directly quotes Jung on the shadow, which I described here: https://superbowl.substack.com/p/jungian-psychology-minus-th...
"CEO finds novel way to fix Capacity problems..."

They just lost about 40% of their paying users with that blog post.
Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Oxford and Cambridge had pretty deep religious ties when they started calling themselves universities.
See the Amazon Prime series "Upload" (two seasons so far).

Rather funny, BTW, compared to most works around a similar premise.
This is a modern version of WordArt in MS Office in 1998. Those who would never employ an artist get something passable, and those who want to differentiate from the masses will adopt new styles from talented people.
23 years ago...

https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2000/04/06/things-you-should-...
> These were religious schools

All universities were. Those other subjects you talk about have entered the curriculum as 'ways to understand the god and its creation' etc. Even including mathematics.
With TTS and STT it felt like a super power
LMAO this same South Korea? https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/young-sout...
Don't forget facebook and google chat (when they were both jabber based)
Solid article. Is it fair to say that the "data services" layer is essentially a cache sitting in front of the database, or am I misunderstanding it's function?
Of course not. The point is that the reader should recognize corporate communication for what it is: fundamentally self-serving. Corporate communication should therefore be met with thoughtful skepticism, and not with naivety or cynicism.
Lawmakers Urge DOJ to Review YieldStar; Warn of “De-Facto Price Collusion”
As the saying goes, youth is wasted on the young.

Very little of this opinion piece suggest actual transferable lessons. It seems much more to do with intrinsic motivation.

It does mention banning cell-phones in class, which seems reasonable to me, but also seems unlikely to be a vast change.
For a variety of reasons CCP talking points are legitimately popular in PRC, and there are many PRC citizens in the tech industry.
Absolutely incredible. Such a strong country with amazing infrastructure
lol, well I was erring on the side of caution because she's clearly doing something wrong here. That being said, in my experience, 5 - 10 minutes is about right unless I go out of my way to preheat at a higher temperature.
Hey, you don't get to start WWIII and then puss out at the last, most kinetic stage. Europe is solidly on track for nuclear war. Russia already said they wouldn't nuke the USA, after nuking the UK that'd take the starch out of us, in their estimation. I suspect they're correct.

NATO has been all fired up to balkanize Russia and start WWIII. I won't hear any whining and moaning when the dream comes true. I won't stand for it no matter HOW many people die.
"Consuming content" is term used by VCs, because when evaluating startups they are mainly concerned about dry, dehumanized, KPI type metrics, like:

1) attracting XXX eyeballs/consumers per quarter

2) producing YYY amount of content for consumption

3) monetizing consumers for $ZZ/mo
Oh, you're right. I wasn't remembering we needed PTEs to cover the data not paged in as well as the data in RAM. Sorry.
Advising people to do something is not collusion unless they take that advice.
China: We'll bring the hardware

US/India: We'll bring the software

Europe: We'll bring the lawyers
I'll start with the Swarm since it's a major point actually: Docker's Swarm mode is comparable to Kubernetes or Nomad: you can launch a cluster of servers and run your application there.

Unlike Kubernetes or Nomad though, it uses mostly the same concepts Docker Compose does, to the point that your development docker-compose.yml file will likely just work there (with some minimal tweaks). I love this website that talks more about it: https://dockerswarm.rocks/

Edit: As opposed to `docker compose up`, when running on a single server: not much. It will restart on server reboot by default, and allow you to run multiple replicas of a service (deprecated in Docker Compose), but that's it. Most important though, it would allow you to add more nodes later on, and it will then scale your services across the whole swarm – so you can start with just one server and scale to hundreds if needed.

> I would much rather have an automated deployment process that doesn't require human input, that way it can be scripted as part of CI/CD, etc.

This is almost doable with Lunni. This guide will walk through setting up a CI for a typical webapp that packages it in a Docker image and pushes to a registry: https://lunni.dev/docs/deploy/from-git/ (currently for GitLab CI and GitHub Actions only)

As for the continuous delivery, we're gonna have a webhook that you can call when your CI pipeline is finished. It's not exposed in the UI yet but I'll try to prioritize it (now that I remember I wanted to do it :')

`git push production` feels a bit easier, but I'm a bit concerned about bloat: for this to work, we'll have to bundle some sort of CI and container registry with Lunni itself. I think sticking with third-party CI is a more elegant approach here. What do you think?
Yes, but your data is getting collected and sold and you are powerless about it.
In that case, have your system use a random IP.

Right now, my macOS system has four publicly-routable IPv6 IPs, all random. New ones are generated, and old ones removed, regularly.

https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/deploy360/2014/pri...
What is substantively different about any of these places that require different zoning laws? Do you think someone is just going to build a mega skyscraper in rural Montana because they can?
> So by your definition, Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Coumbia, U Penn, Brown, Dartmouth, Oxford, Paris, Liepzig, Bordeau, Glascow, Istanbul, Granada, Strassburg, Moscow, Berlin Technical, Freiberg Technical, Cambridge, practically every major Italian university, and hundreds of others aren't universities?

They weren't initially. They tranformed into modern universities in the 1800s.

'A 1643 publication defined the university's purpose: "to advance learning and perpetuate it to posterity, dreading to leave an illiterate ministry to the churches when our present ministers shall lie in the dust.'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_University

Do you think that's what harvard is about today?

> (1) an institution of higher education which (2) offers multiple official, publicly recognized diplomas in secular subjects among others.

A degree mill doesn't a univeristy make. Universities today have to be accredited. Who accredited Bologna? Nothing.

1088 Bologna is not anything anyone around the world considers a university. When people around the world found universities, nobody looks at 1088 Bologna. All modern universities are secular/research based institutions following the humboldtian model.

When harvard decided to transform from a religious institution to a modern university, they didn't look to bologna.
Does Sorbay record audio output?
Company I worked for from 2012-2016 still uses the OpenFire + Pidgin approach for internal IM that I set up around 2013-ish.

I couldn't pry it from their hands. All the employees loved it.

OTR did work well. But causes some small issues with other plugins. I still love how customizable everything was. Both on the server and client.