skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
We support 4 different ones to give folks choice. Some folks want/need features that aren't available on one vs the other (traefik has a ton of features, caddy is simple to configure, nginx has a ton of documentation) so it made sense from that perspective. It was also easy to add once I had the pattern going (though the default has stayed nginx).

One of the main features of Dokku is it's extensibility. You can cut one part out and replace it with another quite easily, and proxying is an example of that. I think that flexibility allows folks to use it in more situations than one otherwise would, though at the cost of being more difficult to maintain (and harder to have cohesion between parts of the system at times).
Yeah, try taking a drive downtown after dark in any major city. See how many of the new units have lights on. Do that night after night, random times. Most are dark. Local/state governments don't actually collect data on this because they're in the pockets of real estate. Vancouver BC had the exact same problem, so they passed a massive vacancy tax, something California needs to implement ASAP.
Assuming best practices are followed, AWS would have have to crack into multiple systems to offer up data for EU residents from AWS machines in the EU. Is there any record of them being required to do so?
This is literally false according to UN and international law.
Yeah. This is a difficult problem to solve and it doesn't seem like any website gets it right all of the time across all devices from what I've seen
Was Unix ahead of the Alto?
"Snitches get Stitches"

The malefactors are more powerful and vindictive than the whistleblowers.

There are no practical legal protections for whistleblowers. Being a whistleblower is a mug's game.
This is why i love HN comments, Good luck for your product !
I mean there is a way out, it would just require a large swath of people to quit feeding into the machine for a few weeks to a few months. It does not have to be violent at all.

99% of people do not allocate capital, do not write laws, and do not drive policy decisions (yes, we vote, but at least in the US your vote has little impact on these things).

We need to agree on what we think the absolute minimum a person should get for working a full-time job. I personally think a person should be able to afford a home if they work full-time with their own salary. Yes, even someone working full-time at starbucks in the Bay Area should be able to pay the mortgage on 1 very small, crappy condo likely with a long-ish commute. Anything less is unacceptable. Working more hours, attaining more degrees/credentials/experience should allow you to afford slightly nicer standards of living.

Anyone that currently can't afford a mortgage on 1 crappy condo in their city should get a new job that pays at that end or move or quit working all together. Let the "smart/capable" people who "deserve" a decent standard of living do the work.

If and when they decide they want to provide others the same standard of living to others for 40hours/week of work, then everyone can go back to work. If everyone did this tomorrow, we would have new policies and laws in weeks-to-months to overhaul housing. Yes, some people would die in the meantime, but it would make the world a better place. We celebrate people going overseas to get blown up as heroes, maybe some poor and middle class people can die domestically as heroes instead to make this happen as well.

Since we can't even start the conversation about the minimum acceptable compensation for working a full-time job, there's probably no way the rest could happen. It is frustrating how a couple weeks-to-months of widespread action (or inaction) by the working-class and poor could change life for so, so many and generations to come, but knowing there is less than 1% chance it will ever happen.

Maybe the working class does deserve their exploitation.
teaching is not storytelling.

teaching is instructional - and works best following journalism writing rules:

1. tell/write the most important thing first (in case the reader don't follow further)

2. tell/write the details

3. then tell/write the least important information (so if the reader don't even reach this point, he was already exposed to the most important information)
Bingo. We pay for all kinds of products that collect and sell our data, namely TVs, cars, Anything-as-a-Service... This would just be seen as an additional revenue stream
He's talking about running IPv4 on his LAN, not the internet. That wouldn't use up any of the internet's IPv4 space and wouldn't affect other internet users.
(I work at Discord in infrastructure.)

We use data services to do "data related things" that make sense to do at a central proxy layer. This may include caching/coalescing/other logic but it doesn't always, it really depends on the particular use case of that data.

For messages, we don't really cache. Coalescing gives us what we want and the hot channel buckets will end up in memory on the database, which is NVMe backed for reads anyway so the performance of a cache wouldn't add much here for this use case.

In other places, where a single user query turns into many database queries and we have to aggregate data, caching is more helpful.
I walk to work every morning- about 3/4 of a mile in Texas.

At least twice a week, while crossing an intersection someone will turn at least 30% of the way through the intersection (if not more) before realizing that I'm crossing the street (in a crosswalk, with a green signal) then slam on the brakes.

This is after I _already started crossing_. I don't think any amount of diligence would protect me from this, other than simply not walking.
I'm glad you got the message. Let's hope the person who really needs it gets it.
Can you please explain what the Vault related failure is about? Is this about timing out services failing to start within an acceptable time range?
Very low population density.
Historically speaking, investing in property/land has never turned out risky. Initial cost has little significance in total profit calculation as long as you can seek rent indefinitely.
Passive adapters from DisplayPort to VGA sounds unlikely? Port powered adapter, sure, but unless they're doing something really weird, you need at least some DACs and maybe something to translate sync? That's unlike single channel dvi-d <-> hdmi conversion which is just a matter of connecting pins; IIUC, you can passively convert from display port to single channel dvi-d (and therefore hdmi), but dual-channel dvi-d needs active conversion too.

If it were passive, I'd say it counts (maybe some board connected vga to the dvi-a pins?), but I not the OP.
I suspect, in general, acceptability (or desire) for complexity in the cloud solution, and budget are positively correlated in customers.
I have always wanted something like this but on an even more in-depth scale.

Let people playing game dev tycoon represent how successful a local business is. Let someone playing a GTA-like game be part of a police chase. Allow truck simulator players to be part of freeway traffic.

Obviously this would be extraordinarily difficult to pull off well, but I can dream.
Cabel Sasser: Untitled Goose Game rejected from the Mac App Store twice
Can someone explain why does the executive need more powers to do this? Why can’t Congress do this? The executive is already more powerful than it was intended to be.
Wow. I've never noticed it until but yeah, that is how things are for me too.
> I think people kind of assumed it would take AGI taking off to end human civilization, but at this point I believe it's pretty clear that LLMs as a class of models are up to the task already

Absolutely, and in addition to that, people with zero grasp of the risks make decisions to trust AI with dangerous things -> money, vehicles, markets, justice, etc.

> Which invites the question, if a lot of our cognition works this way, then just how much more complicated are the bits that don't?

I this we could be mistaking quantity for the important.

Maybe other aspects of thinking, the ones we perceive as mundane, are actually impossible for a computer.

Consider mechanical tasks - a hundred years ago we had huge breakthroughs with engines - oh look, we can make crazy strong machines, we will soon automate all manual labour and blue collar jobs will be a thing of the past!

Well, turns out power was the easy part. A robot arm can lift a car, but getting precision took decades. So now we have power and precision, but try to get a robot arm (under computer control) to undo buttons on your T-shirt without ripping the T-shirt or your face. If a robot arm touches a piece of fabric, or you skin, it has no idea. They routinely kill people.

If you need non-repetitive dexterous movement with fine sensory input, that's basically beyond the cutting edge for today's robots. We can't automate sewing of clothes, cleaning of delicate items, etc.
A single example of government funding an indie developer of a niche title proves that the entire industry up until this point has been going about it wrong?

Government bureaucracy and inefficient spending never burned down good ideas? Never wasted untold billions on failed projects? When it comes to innovative ideas and forward thinking, people turn to short sighted bureaucracy and public funding.
My internal v6 addressing is as such:

fd65:<16-bit-mnemonic>:<vlan-id>::/56

The 16-bit-mnemonic is something memorable to me (e.g. b37a:7357 would be addressable l33tsp34k for "beta test" - that's not the one I use :P). In this case, VLAN 10 would be in the fd65:b37a:7357:10::/56. Gateway for it is fd65:b37a:7357:10::1.

It's really not harder than IPv4 for these cases.

Servers and services are assigned static IPs either via DHCPv6 or directly on the boxes (or both as I kinda use the DHCP table as a poor man's IPAM). Other devices internal IPs and globally routable IPs are assigned through SLAAC with privacy extensions where available.
Every MS product (except for maybe VSCode and latest .NET) feels like Gates and Ballmer are still there saying "whatever - you'll have to use this because your $BIGCORP bought it from our salespeople!"
Uranus blasted a gas bubble 22,000 times bigger than Earth (2020)
> "different" platform with it's own unique patterns and quirks

Much of what OP listed was a criticism directed at LiveView, the 'Live App' functionality, not Phoenix, the web framework. Live Apps are not exclusive to Phoenix either, as there are now imitators for every other web framework now, which at least speaks to its broader appeal amongst developers. So the criticism could be leveled towards the far less mature 'Live App' libraries on PHP/Python/JS/C# and so on and on:

https://github.com/liveviews/liveviews

As for lack of documentation, I find this a strange criticism to level at the Elixir ecosystem. It's documentation tooling is very good, and so libraries are typically very well documented, and often include 'doc tests' which double as both examples of usage and inline unit tests. You can simply launch the REPL (called IEx) and type `h <module>.<name of function>` and get documentation for any function.

As for the language, I think immutability and using GenServers could be a little counter-intuitive to people used to mutating variables inside of loops and using shared singletons, but elixir-lang.org and Exercism provide very approachable learning materials for understanding the language.
It used to be called innovation
I’ve done ranking-adjacent work at three companies (Google, Quora, and Facebook), so when OpenAI released the ChatGPT API a few days ago, my natural first instinct was to ask myself “I wonder if this would be good at ranking social media feeds?”.

Based on my experiments so far, it looks like the answer is “yes”. Indeed GPT makes content-based feed ranking so easy that it has the potential to completely change the way we think about ranking - potentially shifting ranking power from platforms to individual users and groups.
Copy out a short novel, by hand, using a quill pen, and then decide what the limit is for handwritten books.

By the way, you also need to make the quills, ink and paper by hand, and work with natural light and no eyeglasses.
Avtually, he is correct and you are badly misunderstanding the U.S. position of strategic ambiguity [0]. The PRC and the ROC believed for decades and each one claimed that they are both the one true China and the other is an imposter. The US agrees that there is one true China, but they won't say which one. Confusing? That's pretty much the point.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Policy_of_deliberate_ambigui...
I could understand that, but what about highly competitive markets like large cap NASDAQ and NYSE stocks?
Strictly speaking about software/coding businesses all the people I know who make it work are contract devs. The most stable way is to just get an x-month contract and then rinse and repeat as needed.

From people I've spoken to/worked with who do this they mention a pay increase due to handling their own insurance etc.

Even if you "work for yourself" you still will have a "client" - the client can just be another Company.

Of course there's the "product path" you mentioned but that's less reliable and consistent. Feel free to ask more questions if interested, this is a good topic for HN and a lot of people seem interested in the topic (myself included)
I'm a little concerned about that site: For its test connecting to Google, besides using port 80 (instead of 443), it reports "500 Can't connect to google.com:80 (No route to host)". I just tested to Google IPv6 ports 80, and it works fine for me.

Regardless, Google's chart of IPv6 adoption (https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=ipv6...) continues to trend towards IPv6 adoption. I expect that if you looked at a chart of web site IPv6 adoption, it would also be trending upwards (though not at as steep a rate).

If that's true, then it stops being a chicken-and-egg problem, and turns in to a game of chicken: Who starts supporting IPv6 first, you or your competitors?
Be careful with this line of thinking. This reads like overcorrection. Like when a nerd realizes they need to learn to network and become obsessed with all aspects of socialization. You can damage your technical excellence through neglect! If you overcorrect and let your technical excellence suffer because you prioritize people too much, then people will like you but not care as much about what you do. They will be less likely to want you in their professional network. ie they like you but don’t respect you.

It all matters, your product or service is only as good as the weakest aspect. Making an offering great means constantly putting your attention on anything falling behind to ensure excellence in all categories that matter.
The language model hallucinated the "kakuro minus" variant. Google says it doesn't exist.