skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And yet it's still treated as if it had negative value. Or is a disposable resource like a rainforest that you can just burn through and discard.
But you can imagine a later iteration doing that?
MBTI and things like INTP are 'definitions'.

Trying to make business decisions on the basis of MBTI metrics, which is what it is often criticised for, is of course misguided.

But saying "MBTI is pseudoscience you cannot be INTP" makes as much sense as "Hair colour names are unscientific, so you can't identify as blond".

Sure you can. It's a description. I wouldn't go ascribing intelligence on the basis of hair colour, but I wouldn't doubt you have a hair colour either.

And if you've found commonalities / common experiences and like being with other blond people, that's fine too.
Yeah that is a flaw. You could also just make your browser window very short on desktop. I think if it’s shorter than the lander height you may land in 0 seconds?
Buying a license is what you do when you hire a legal firm to draft you one. Not when you click "Buy" on a Kindle E-Book on Amazon.
The most tragic casualty of this is the ancient wisdom of just google your tech issues. It doesn't work any more! All you get is page upon page of auto-generated help sites that pretend to have solutions for your exact problem but are all actually the same list of generic tips (restart your computer! update your drivers!)

I can sort through it with enough effort, but it's a disaster for non-tech people who could muddle through their computer problems before but now just get hopelessly stuck in the Google Search swamp every time.
It sounds to me that they are learning how to write, ChatGPT is the tool that they are using to do so.
Chatgpt should be able to cluster things and see were clusters could be, collect everything necessary for that theoretically cluster and the human could evaluate it.
The initial sentence of the original comment is the pseudoscientific part.

> That's a typical INTP / type 5 enneagram brain wiring.
I'm guessing that monetizing comments is a lot more difficult on reddit as any links can be removed by admins/mods/automoderator.
Are they charms, at least?
Purpose defines manhood. In terms of living in western society, economic participation means unless you already have resources, you are required to procure resources to ensure survival, this is carefully balanced by female predisposition to a desire security and stability as their primary mating strategy, as this further reinforces the drive to procure resources. This is a management strategy that is as old as the written word.
This game was on Island of Dr Brain.
It depends on problem you're thinking about.

If it's tactical problem, then slow is not good for others.

If it's strategic problem, then it's good to spend long time on it.
But in the context of TFA - searching Reddit to get factual answers - what appears on the reddit.com front page from day to day is largely irrelevant, surely?
People really need to get better at spotting BS. That's true of CCP sponsored BS and FOX and everything else. Until then, we cannot have a real democracy. I am concerned it will take a generation as people do not learn but instead have to die out and be replaced by people who grew up in the new paradigm...
Thanks for the feedback, I ought to just make the font responsive on larger screens. I will get to it!
Who cares? The real reddit stuff is not in the front pages.
That sounds like it makes sense - but if human readers know what's a good search result and what isn't, why would Google not be able to optimize their algo accordingly? If the results for a query don't match the "nature of the query", it's a bad result. If the algo can be gamed, it isn't aiming for the actual goal, i.e. it fundamentally fails at information retrieval.
> I take it you haven't interviewed for a SE in a while? The status quo requires you to perform months of unpaid labor, not days, just in the form of memorizing the solutions to every single Leetcode Hard problem. How is that better?

I guess because it kinds "scales". Once you are familiar with Leetcode you can use this skill to take interviews with different companies. Take-home exercises dont' "scale".

That being said, I believe people are against take-home exercises exactly for the reason you support it: it's usable code. They worry the companies will exploit candidates by using their code for free. Leetcode is "useless" so it's safe.
Marc Andreessen: The Future with $100 wall size TVs and $1M 4-Year Degrees
Do you suspect it's primarily the 'prestige' that was missing or the analysis (or maybe even something like layout), which made the initial paper submissions fail?

If papers are rejected purely on prestige rather than merit that would be quite sad.
I don't understand why people don't think this is noteworthy.

Would it be noteworthy if it this game (whether or not it existed before) were designed and implemented by someone who has very limited experience with software development in a few hours? Well, the fact that ChatGPT did this means the former is now a very real possibility.

That you can go from conceptual inception of a framework to a fairly complete product in a few hours with very little experience is a big deal.
https://archive.is/hDdts
I'm then the proof that intp is wrong.

Because I think fast and that intp also matches me.

But I'm honestly thinking this type of categorisation is stupid and doesn't add calue
Like what? Other than hiring a copy editor, of course.
Currying is amazing though.
I got an alert from Firefox Monitor, but I have no idea what to do because I have no direct relationship with Eye4Fraud, nor do I know which of the many sites I have accounts with were affected. The report says that encrypted passwords were in the breach. Would Eye4Fraud keep their customers' customers' passwords as part of their service?
I'm totally with you on that, but who, besides us, knows about this and understands the inner workings?

Ask your parents or whomever and they'll probably tell you that they are glad, that stern.de is doing all those recommendations and tests.

They'll trust them, be it out of naivety of lack of alternatives or the "glory" those newspapers might have had in "the old times" (or still have today).

I'm not sure how to solve this, to be honest.
Idioms for Polymorphism and Templates
Here's what I get (with content blockers disabled) - similar to TFA. Three large ads, interestingly now labelled "Sponsored" rather than "Ad", and then the actual instructions.

https://imgur.com/a/2OKnAtb
>When Airdrop doesn’t work, it just gets stuck. No timeout, no nothing.

Even when Airdrop works, it doesn't work. One "feature" of Airdrop is that if you try to airdrop something from your iPhone to your iPad, for example, but you had already airdropped it earlier, it won't give you ANY indication. It will make a nice ping sound, and just do nothing. This is so infuriating.
I'm a fast thinker and good at debating but I'm a relatively slow learner.
It's probably because I tend to initially disbelieve everything I'm taught - I need to see a lot of cross-references and utility value before my brain will accept new information and it will still not seem like it is a sure fact. I never feel like I know anything with 100% certainty. Every piece of knowledge I have is more like a probability in my mind.

I have great memory when it comes to useful or interesting things but if I can't figure out the utility of some information, my brain struggles to learn it and will quickly discard it.

The most interesting experience I remember was at school when I was a small child. I didn't understand the concept of school or education at that point. I remember after I moved up a grade, the teacher was referencing concepts which I had learned the year before (I think it was related to alphabet and reading) but because I was in a different class (and different teacher), I did not make the (supposedly obvious) assumption that the teacher was referring to concepts from the previous year (which came from a different source). In my mind, because I didn't understand the purpose of education or school, I had fully compartmentalized the knowledge from the previous year/grade and I couldn't make sense of the content from the later grade which built on top. Once I learned the purpose of school and figured out that knowledge from previous years was still relevant and that knowledge wasn't supposed to be compartmentalized based on the teacher/class, I was able to start learning faster. At least fast enough to be a slightly above average student throughout all my school and university years. I remember being surprised that all other kids seemed to know intuitively that knowledge 'stacked' regardless of the teacher or context. It was a big revelation to me.

I still think I have a tendency to compartmentalize information/knowledge provided to me by different people. My brain compartmentalizes everything based on source until there is enough consensus/synthesis between the sources and then it gets merged into the trunk.

But now that I think of it, it doesn't seem that ridiculous for a child to think that knowledge taught by different people isn't compatible... If you think about modern education, it's actually quite amazing and weird that two different teachers who never met might have the exact same knowledge as each other to the extent that they can reference each other's thoughts and ideas... To a child, it can seem like telepathy.
The reusability fallacy – Part 2
Well, the term "indie hacker" means starting a business yeah. The difference with just "starting a business" is that the mindset is most of the time to build a small scale project that can be built and maintained alone.
Thanks a lot.

I don't know much but tried to make a web based version of this with very basic functionality.

https://twitter.com/motyar/status/1632699003061108737
Cool, you’re pointing out something many also agree, but how exactly is your comment even remotely constructive? There’s much more in OP’s comment than Myers-Briggs.
Why would I give up on shell.nix if flakes API isn't stable yet? I've got my own patterns around default.nix and shell.nix that provide better ergonomics than flakes.
>its output is way too boring and verbose for my linking

Have you tried adjusting your prompts? Even just a single instruction to 'be concise' will make a difference. For some applications, you might be able to give examples fo the writing style you are looking for.
Google held control of who they reward using AdWords, they decided who lives and who dies, who goes bancrupt and who prosper
It is their system that rewards SEO spam

If you are a creator, you can put up a website, pat for deiagn and hosting fees, and hopw google finds you amongst SEO spam.

Or you cam put a oage on instagram, for free, and deal with none of that shit
I disagree that whatever ranking system google uses will just be gamed to the same extent. If google downgraded the rank of pages with lots of ads and trackers it would substantially reduce the incentive to game the system, the reason it won’t is because most of those pages are running Adsense so there’s every incentive for google to keep the status quo.
I analyzed recent Y Combinator cohorts, here are some interesting things I found
If you're interested in getting into YC and want to learn more about what kind of startups they've been accepting recently represented in the tech industry, check out this insightful article wrote about analyzing startup representation in YCombinator. I hope it is useful for founders interested in the business side of tech!
There are lots of people, myself included, who are aware of how much data big tech has already cultivated on us and don’t give a damn if at this point BBC or Mike’s Bike Blog get in on the action too. Really we just wanted to read our article and not be interrupted, so we can go back to what matters more: anything not on the computer.

I’ve never felt protected or assisted by the cookie banners, just annoyed and inconvenienced.
Yeah, amount of credit cards & the total available credit limit is used as a negative signal when applying for a loan. But I think you'd have to have some completely silly amount for it to _really_ affect the outcome. You can easily show that you've not used the cards, for example. If you have 10 credit cards which you use constantly, it would affect your ability to get a loan. To me this makes sense, but of course, it's what I'm used to.
> The use of guns cannot be regulated effectively without physically removing guns from a society.

Isn't that like saying theft cannot be regulated effectively without removing the things people want to steal from society? The goal is not perfect gun control, but reducing access to guns and thereby reducing the crime and harm that stems from gun ownership. So it being illegal to own X doesn't mean no one will own and use X, but that fewer people will and law enforcement will be able act against those who do.
Pretty interesting actually (just skimmed through some of the higher level ideas, have bookmarked for later reading). Is there reference code available also you can share? Thanks for sharing!
I didnt know there was such a rich ecosystem of devices. Well done!

The PineTime caught my eye, the price is fantastic, unfortunately its not waterproof, which is why only the the Apple Watch Ultra currently and tentatively could be used along side my Casio G Shock collection.
Russian Dinosaurs Fossils
https://www.lifeatseacruises.com/
The discussion was probability of ChatGPT having invented it, the probability that description for such a game is in ChatGPT's dataset is extremely high. We have examples of that exact game existing (the top post of this thread), and we know from my links that there are countless texts about puzzles like this out there, although they aren't exactly the same.

> It’s not enough to say “a lot of games with similar rules exist” and if anything, that just shows that a generative AI is good at what it does: break down the rules of a game and make modifications to make what is potentially a new game.

No it doesn't, even if that is the case it just shows that it adds random variations. Since we only see the trimmed subset of ideas it generates that people found good enough to post, the smart one is the person.

You would need to prove that ChatGPT actually consistently generates working puzzle ideas that are novel to convince anyone that it actually does so. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, so all I need to do is find plausible explanations to how ChatGPT found it, you would need much better evidence to convince people it actually did make a novel game.
Since word heuristics and pagerank are useless nowadays, which signals should Google prioritize instead? Bounce rate ? Engagement ?

Which metrics can proxy user satisfaction without turning into clickbait-land?
I have often wished that there were a search engine that would let me filter out pages with monetization (affiliate links, calls to action, ads, etc.).

However, every time I consider this idea, I wonder how much of the web would be left. Besides social media sites, government pages, and technology blogs, is there a lot of authentic content out there on arbitrary topics? Perhaps even if Google were motivated to deliver a good search experience, they couldn’t do it.
> Prices can vary and still all be affordable.

Some percentage of the top of the range will always be unaffordable to the median income. Whatever a high-floor apartment overlooking Central Park costs is something that a median income won’t be able to afford. (IMO, that’s totally fine/normal.)
How would you provide incremental per-module compilation for your Nix derivation of the app?
Show HN: Tagged Unions and Factories in TypeScript
Wish sum types got more love in TypeScript.

I have settled on this style to minimize the boilerplate code needed to write tagged unions and tagged union factories.

Lines 1-8 are helper functions for declaring tagged union types. They are used for non-generic tagged unions.

Non-generic tagged unions' types should be inferred correctly.

Generic tagged unions are super hard to type, as TypeScript only allows functions to be typed as generic values.

Wish you enjoy this as well.
> it was possible to change someone's mood by that. Online content definitely impacts mental health

For approximately 10% of the population, who are considered highly suggestible. For comparison, Fox News had 1.21 percent of the US population as a primetime audience in 2020. One can imagine how that number increases with shared environments of family, friends, peers, and work (in other words, networks).

My mother is a great example. She won’t take tech advice from anyone in our family, but if one of her close friends shares that same information with her, it somehow becomes history—signed, sealed, and delivered. She’s influenced by her peers in a highly suggestible way.

Don’t know what the Twitter numbers are. In the 1960s, Huxley speculated that suggestibility was as high as 20%, and argued that if you controlled 20% of the population, you controlled the whole of society. More recently, that number has come down to 15%. My point remains the same as before.
I don't think there is a definite answer for "what a property designed framework" is but I can try to explain where Phoenix sits in the possible trade-offs.

One possible approach frameworks use to provide escape hatches is configuration. You ship with a series of defaults and, once you want to change it, you need to find out the proper knob to turn. A downside of this approach is finding the proper knobs when you need to tweak it.

Another approach is code generation: you generate code (or configuration) and keep the knobs clear to user. There are still defaults (and conventions) but the knobs are laid out upfront in your application. The downside here is that having so many knobs upfront may seen daunting or noisy.

Since you mentioned Rails, I will provide references on how Rails and Phoenix use those.

Both frameworks leverage both techniques above, but Phoenix errs more on code generation and Rails more on configuration. Here is a practical example.

Rails has a middleware stack that is part of all applications. This stack is hidden from you. Here is how the generator file for said application looks like:

https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/d0d9e8e576b06c19f8507510...

Phoenix has a similar stack (called plug) and the default stack is part of your application. Here is the generator file for it (it is not part of your app but used to generate it):

https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/blob/3c27a34c27c...

You can look at these approaches and try to compare the pros and cons.

---

My biased opinion: I have worked with both and I prefer the Phoenix approach. I understand someone may find having all steps in your endpoint noisy or daunting, but the plus side is that it takes a glance to see all steps a request goes through and you can tweak it in any way you want.

When comparing to Rails, if you want to insert a middleware in the middle of the default stack, you need to explicitly say before or after which middleware. If you want remove something, you need to state the negation and say "I don't want to have this". Overtime this makes it hard for you to visualize what your application does, because you need to assemble the pieces in your head and use tools to print the stack for you.

This also matters on releasing new framework versions. Because Rails has its own stack, if it changes the default middleware stack in any way, it can slightly change how your code. What if the middleware you were inserting before was moved up? Or removed altogether? Or maybe a middleware you deleted was replaced by another one, with similar functionality. Do you want to remove it too? This can lead to subtle differences of behaviour when upgrading.

The code generation approach requires you to opt-in to the new features, which is, IMO, one of the reasons why Phoenix could avoid breaking changes in the last 8 years or so.

This is in no way a knock on Rails. I am 100% confident the Rails team is aware of those trade-offs and could equally argue for their choices. It also isn't a binary choice either, both frameworks use both approaches, with some general preferences for one over the other.
Yes, not according to what I'm aware of, population is moving more and more to big cities.

If I'm understanding it correctly, it means that the social pressure decreased too?
> Then there are whole subs banned (including non political) for wrongthink

I don't really like defending Reddit, because I don't like them as a company, but I don't think this is correct. There's a financial incentive for them to not ban subreddits, so groups have to behave quite obnoxiously or blatantly break Reddit's rules to get banned. Just having a certain political disagreement is not nearly enough.

And if you disagree, please post some examples.

As an aside, I was curious about the use of the word "wrongthink". It sounds like something Orwell would have come up with, but a search suggests that it's actually a neologism that is used mainly by the alt-right.
Is it just me, or is this a fancy article with nice animations full of marketing speak, but doesn't actually mention the reason why they removed their previous blue brand/color?
3G is still too good! )

I've recently tried to open a Goolag table and do an online payment while the ISP limited connection to 80kb/s (like a dial-up). While I KIND OF understand the futility of opening web-stuff like spreadsheets, the second task of sending a whopping 30 bytes of credit card data failed dramatically. WHY THE HECK!?! Why the heck even such critical parts of Internet became web2.0 slow over-bloated AJAX-JSON-stuffed piles of garbage?! Smoothie-drinking chilled-openspace web-cod...desig..makers? don't realize that their services JUST MIGHT happen to get accessed by people in potentially disastrous situations? Like the world never seen earhquakes, floods and wars? Or just rains. Yeah, rains that block your 4G and wet your stupid touchscreens.
Because there's no better neural network for problem solving than a human brain.

This joke sums it all up:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/ufdprb/sur...
EUV Requirements Halved?
Check out https://github.com/antialiasis/favorite-picker
The favorite Pokémon picker is based on this and I have used it (and similar ones, based on Tōhōsort) to do similar sorting.
You think in foreseeable future we are unable to develop a credit system that does not call an AI API?

I dont' know, those systems seems rather closed. I have my doubts.

We have rules against discrimination of gender. Just as an example. Those work without looking into every API call.
It’s already been demonstrated how most inflation has been caused by corporate profit seeking, much of this confirmed by corporate executives boasting to shareholders.

Please stop amplifying capitalist propaganda.
Isn't color blindness mixing up red & green?

So why would a green design be better than a blue design? Naively, it's strictly worse.
There is something better than article: documentation. https://pyo3.rs/v0.18.1/
In what sense will it kill social media?