skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you look at how much infrastructure was quickly developed around Stable Diffusion, the same might repeat here. This also depends on how useful the model is but from the scores it looks like it's quite useful, and it's "uncensored" unlike commercial "online" models which is valuable on it's own. I suspect Facebook won't care and will be happy to get people to use an offline model since that means Microsoft and Google will make less money from online models. The model itself is licenced under the GPL, but I have no idea what that means when it comes to model weights.

Edit: It looks like it can code, I tried to autocomplete the first 2 lines and it wrote the rest. Local Github Copilot here we come?:

//find index of element in sorted array in O(log(N)) time using binary search
int find_idx(int a[N], int element) {
int low = 0, high = N-1;
while (low <= high) {
int mid = (low + high) / 2;
if (a[mid] == element)
return mid;
else if (a[mid] < element)
low = mid + 1;
else
high = mid - 1;
}
return -1;
}
I tried it just now on M1 14'': nothing...
It turns out there's different types of coercion that don't involve guns and yet still have the effect of forcing someone to act in ways they otherwise would prefer not to. This is what I'm talking about when I say the philosophy lacks a comprehensive theory of power.
They’re doing them on the GPU using Core Animation framework. The iPhone has used the GPU for smooth animations since the start while GPU usage on Android depends on whether the device has one.
Indeed. In C it is also the empty file, though it takes some compiler settings boogaloo to make it work.

See: https://www.ioccc.org/1994/smr.hint
In MWI the event where we stop observing some of its state is the collapse, it didn't disappear, you just made it harder to understand. So MWI doesn't make things clearer, it hides the complexity of quantum mechanics, you might like it better when you no longer see the complexity, but to me I want it front and center so that I don't miss it.

Edit: Or to make it clearer that it isn't magic, the event where some parts of the wave function suddenly stops interacting with the other parts of the wave function, that is a wave function collapse, and yes it does happen in MWI, you can't just change the laws of quantum mechanics so it has to work that way.
It works first and second order.

First order, every number is equally (un)likely and there is no harm in choosing yesterday’s number, because it is nevertheless no more unlikely today than any other.

Second order, you want to avoid split pots, so doing what others are doing reduces EV… your number should be as random as you can make it… and any lottery that actually produced the same numbers twice in a short period of time would be subject to increased scrutiny, which must also be factored in (you might get no prize if it is discovered, even if the conclusion were untrue, that the lottery were rigged) so yesterday’s numbers actually are objectively bad choices.

Either way, the metaphor stands quite well.
> I'm curious whether you've found the exercises are enough to ensure you've really learned the content?

IMO if a student is motivated to learn, there is plenty of interesting content to think about deeply. However, if a student is not motivated then more exercises are needed. I've noticed recently that newer courses now include extra problem sets, so I assume Brilliant is working on this!
I did not notice that. I will have to download procal and give it a try.
I also trying to come to terms with this, mostly need to design new custom key settings.

Zellij has Lock interface, default Ctrl+G, which you can use and in that mode it only takes that one key, but it's a bit different from how screen works.
I have never regretted quitting a job. Even if it turns out to be the best job you had, change is good. Three years in FinTech sounds like you might need some perspective.
Well it seems like they are better off than on social security

>At the end of fiscal year 2018, the average annuity paid to career rail employees was $3,525 per month, the average annuity paid for all retired rail employees was $2,815 per month, and the average retirement benefit under Social Security was $1,415 per month
The Royal BC Museum in Victoria BC for a number of years had an exhibit that featured a film of a descent in a bathysphere, you can watch it here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChOywETthqg
I did not say it made anything easier to understand. I did not say it made anything clearer. I did not say I like it better. Stop putting words into my mouth.

I said it has fewer mechanism. Which it does. Because it does not have the wave function collapse mechanism.
The maximum fine a rail company can face is $225k, even when loss of life occurs. Unfortunately, the regulatory regime you describe has been captured for roughly the past 80 years.

The reality is that the legal system makes it so difficult and expensive for claimants to recoup the harms they suffer. Causality is hard to prove and the claimants are up against corporations which have teams of lawyers and a court system which has made tort cases have a high burden of proof. This can make it difficult for claimants to win, even if they have a strong case. Plus, tort law is a complex area of law, and it can be difficult for claimants to understand their rights and to navigate the legal system.
This is one of the challenges of riding on such a thin (narrow) line (like a plank - or even just the painted line on the side of the road) is so difficult.

The thing is that in order keep a srtraight line on a very narrow path, you need much finer motor control of your arms, a good 'feel' for your bike, some good components, and the ability to remember to be able to look farther in front of the bike, but keep your awareness of where you are steering based on your inputs to the bike, but not looking down.

If you want to be impressed by one of the best in the world at steering difficult scary /r/sweatypalms courses:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9kOkY1nYc0uADWRiRH64Rw

Watch the "do a wheeelie" vid on his YT home -- doing a wheelie on a train-rail, and jumping to the other train-rail without losing your wheelie or momentum - but all his vids are mind blowing.
That's wrong for the reasons mentioned here: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/01/housing-cr...

For one thing, institutional buyers don't buy up enough of the supply to really move the needle in most metro areas. For another, institutional buyers generally turn homes into rentals. They can't really overpay for the housing unless there's lots of yuppies around who can pay the high rents.

Supply shortages are certainly a factor, but they're related to the problem I pointed out. California knowledge worker yuppies are facing supply shortages in their own market, and getting pushed out to cheaper markets like Oregon. That has a particularly negative effect because they have so much more money than the people who are already living in those places.
I've only heard or read various sources referencing the nerve / hair damage that you mention, with the audible noise being sometimes associated with the auditory system increasing its sensitivity in those frequencies in an effort to hear something from the damaged sensors.
That's fair. I didn't mention that I've gone in for intraoral bodywork to try to address TMJ as a possible issue. It hasn't yielded results, unfortunately. That doesn't prove anything one way or the other, of course.
Andrej karpathy made a YouTube Video about implementing a very small GPT (nanoGPT) from scratch, very interesting.
> screen to zellij instead

FFS. Can't we, at some point, be done with wheel re-invention?
But the wave function collapse is there. Wave functions stops interacting with each other, that is a micro system phenomena, it requires nothing of our macro state magic, and we can observe it, it happens, and that is what we call "wave function collapse", and it happen in MWI.
Loks like the current iteration of LLMs are very good when it comes to being able to hallucinate!
Even if I could do that today, I wouldn't. Those sandwiches always look suspect.
Try reading the whole page.

> Comirnaty is a monovalent COVID-19 vaccine that is approved for use as a two-dose primary series for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 12 years of age and older.
We could also just add a lot more supply in these desirable places. There's no reason we can't.
An example from my work:

We have a Yocto build that results in about 120MB worth of files that make up our app and Yocto. Originally we had a script that would write a bootloader, partition and format ext4 our target's eMMC, and decompress a 120MB tarball to that filesystem.

That worked well, but we wanted our script to become OS-independent, as our field team ran Windows laptops. It's quite difficult to get Windows to do an ext4 format, and I wanted our tool to have a minimal number of dependencies (e2fsprogs requirement? some proprietary thing from Paragon? no thanks)

So instead, have Yocto produce an image containing the bootloader and all four pre-formatted ext4 filesystems. No operating system needs to do the format if the filesystem already exits within, it's just a raw block write. But now the image is 4GB, the size of our eMMC, and writing all of it would be painfully slow.

Thankfully Yocto also outputs a bmap file which maps the parts of that 4GB which are empty space -- blocks we don't need to write when commissioning our target device. So our commissioning tool was rewritten in Go, and I wrote a bmap implementation in Go to do the write. Flashing our target is as fast as it used to be, but now that tool can be easily made to work on multiple operating systems.
Please don't link to the Daily Mail. It's the british tabloid equivalent of Fox News.
Are we talking something similar to this [1]?

[1] https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/11/05/man-seeks-mi...
You do have to license the whole program as GPL, but as you say, you are free to duel-license parts of the code with a more-permissive license.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLModuleLicense
I'm not sure what window manager was on AIX in 1991 on an RT. Maybe it was twm. That is the first time I used Unix / X11.

When I started college in 1993 our default environment was mwm but I quickly switched to vtwm and had a really cool setup. I switched to AfterStep because I loved the NeXTSTEP look and used that and WindowMaker for 10 years before moving to XFCE.
Yeah, but that's more than twice as many keypresses now.
Risk is not binary. It's a statistical function predicting the likelihood of an outcome.

We can bucket that risk in most cases. There are schelling points.

People, regular boring unsophisticated people, frequently successfully mail hardcore drugs through the postal system. This is with the postal system having an actual objective to stop them. Overwhelmingly the postal service fails at this, and even when it does interdict the drugs, it almost never identifies the sender. How much more quaint is it to send documents.

The goal of "OpSec" is to achieve the goal. If "OpSec" acts as a forever barrier because it can't successfully predict real life risk, you're doing it wrong.
A better explanation is Lindybeige's video about pre-decimal British coinage:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2paSGQRwvo

It goes into the underlying mindset behind this seemingly bizarre system. Basically:

- the penny was always the fundamental unit. every denomination was defined in terms of the penny, not the pound or the shilling. It wasn't like the modern system where the fundamental unit is the pound (or dollar) and pennies (or cents) are defined as hundredths.

- the system was evolved, not designed

- different multiples and fractions of the penny went in and out of fashion at various times, so at any given time the system wasn't quite complicated as you might think, even though in retrospect it can be hard to keep track of every denomination from every period

- the shilling (12 pence) and the pound (240 pence) stuck around and became important denominations because those are highly-composite numbers and so have lots of ways of splitting them up

And this isn't stated explicitly in the video but it seems the system lost its value due to inflation, not any desire for metrication. Nobody gave a damn about pennies by the late 60s. You could very well make a new version of "old money" with modern coinage, just inflated by a factor of 100. A neo-shilling = 12 dollars, etc. Could be a fun cyberpunk worldbuilding detail.
If there is a causal link and someone finds it with high enough confidence, then yeah it feels like a class action lawsuit is inevitable.
Very much the conclusions I had reached myself over the past few days, where it seems that some degree of dishonesty is necessary and a lot of it depends on the people you're working with (I guess we should be nuanced by default).

You're right though, I've been doing this after finding an employer that has much happier staff than most I've worked at, on a team that actually accomplishes complex tasks. It was a massive improvement to my mental health (i.e, your advice is good), but ultimately, my work is still largely wasted due to organizational issues. I don't consider this outlook terribly grim. I'm always free to pick up another career or start my own business, and I think it's less upsetting to realize that some of the people lying at least have good motivations.

I think 2. is the crux of the matter - if you can't be sure it is time well-spent, it makes a lot of sense to exit structures where that is the case, assuming two things. One being that you highly value your work producing something (as opposed to say, not having much stress at work) and two being that you believe you can reasonably find better work.

On the latter point, as I was discussing with a friend who is quite senior the other day, it depends entirely on whether you've given up on finding a truly impactful/happy workplace. Many of my friends in tech have gone for the latter, and are simply trying to get their salaries high enough to retire ASAP. Some smaller group have been working hard to transform faulty organizations with mixed results. I have friends outside of tech who have no such qualms, and have happily found roles where they know they're having a positive social impact, earn decently, and manage their own time (and being their own manager seems to be an effective antidote to needing to lie - perhaps there's some interface with a customer where they might need to stretch the truth a bit, but it's not like book store owners and barbers are walking around spouting off garbage all day).

In any case, I very much appreciate your thoughts!
Are there any advantages of using asdf instead of Pyenv for Python version management (or disadvantages)?
Again, I will point out that generative models aren't necessarily only usable on corporate megaclouds... they can leak, they can be trained and run by individuals on cheap hardware, and that effort can be P2P networked.

That wont stop us from getting fired, but it will make the generative products harder to sell back to us.

Whats more, I think the hardware makers are "neutral" on this issue, as they like selling to consumers in bulk as much as they like selling to clouds at a huge markup.
To do X is irrelevant, what matters is if it meets legal definition of reasonable suspicion, which I assure you is both extremely low at border crossings and that law enforcement is very aware of how to establish it; hence why the warrant was granted.

Way to address issues like this is not online or at a border crossing — but by changing laws themselves. I assure that vast majority of people support laws like these, otherwise they would not have been in place so long.

Again, I am not saying I agree with situation, but attempting to accurately describe the reality of it.
Minimal, allocation-free OpenMetrics implementation for no-std/embedded Rust
My mistake. Different train company - although his also had derailments & is also failing at track and train safety, as detailed in the link.
In MWI, there is one single wave function. It is the single wave function which describes the state of "the multiverse". It is always in a superposition of eigenstates. It never collapses. That's literally the entire point of the MWI.

If you refuse to understand that, you have some reading to do. I don't believe further discussion is fruitful.
Redirects is fine. "Cool URIs don't change" refers to the fact that this resource should be reachable on that URI forever, which a redirect solves; changing URIs without keeping the old URI is what many people do and that's not that nice.
I'm going to comment in a different direction: As someone who achieved great success at a young age (under 30) it is almost impossible for it not to go your head, mostly because everyone treats you like you are a genius. Unfortunately for me, I lived the adage that "pride goeth before the fall"
Saying it's only based on luck is clearly wrong. Saying no luck is involved is clearly wrong.
I was looking for this comment - I have a different ANC headphone, and I definitely noticed that it puts a new kind of pressure on my ears. Not often, but only when the ANC is activated, and when I have been using it for an extended time. No tinnitus here either, just something I noticed.
My very good friend works in a hospital as an otorinolaryngologist, specializing in hearing damage and hearing aids. I actually met her today for a long walk.

According to her, tinnitus rates have absolutely exploded over her career (since 2002) and the correlation with frequent use of earbuds is very obvious.

I know that correlation neq causation and all the stuff about anecdata, but I am not willing to dismiss concern of a doctor who, in the last 20 years, has seen thousands of people with hearing problems.
> I've also noted today many people who take cannabis regularly also do not dream often.

As someone who smokes weed I heard this as well. But from experience I still dream, just that its harder for me to remember them if at all.
When I was trying to transition into tech and find my first Real Developer job, I found a job posting for a local startup in a Who is hiring? thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14242143) and reached out. They ended up taking a chance on me as a junior developer. It helped to kickstart the rest of my career in tech, and it absolutely changed my life.

Perfect example of the role luck can play. Glad I checked that thread that day.
This guy [1] won 1.6 million/

[1] https://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/16/justice/new-mexico-search...
Wow HN is just hate these days whenever someone mention BTC in headline. If Nostr is successful, the hate will be amazing for missing twice in a decade.
same for me and it ya it does in the sense that in waking life the brain experiences the what is(or what we think is), where in dreams we experience the what could be. the thought that we are learning and growing in this life by actually experiencing the x amount of lives we live in other dimensions while our physical self lays dormant in the one we are bound to is pretty interesting. and that our brains actually evolved to make use of that data meaningful even more so. perhaps we are experiencing but a dream of another version of ourselves when we are awake
I think the point is more that most people don't know why they succeeded or fail.
Is the OP trying to make a point about success being random or about how you shouldn’t mindlessly copying somebody else’s path to success?
I don’t actually get why people come to a tech startup forum and post this. Like, I get why this guy posts on Twitter (his audience likes this stuff), but why come to HN and do this?

I get it. /r/workreform, the managers are taking all the money and only make tps reports. But surely not every place needs to be like this.
People want to be able to fine-tune an unfiltered base model to anything they like.
Most quantum mechanics researchers just ignores waveform collapses entirely because you can do a lot without it. I don't think that they have anything significant to add to this discussion since MWI just has to do with wavefunction collapse., them being experts at wavefunctions when the function doesn't collapse doesn't make a difference.

Edit: To add, all quantum mechanics interpretations are equivalent when you ignore wavefunction collapse. So only experts on wavefunction collapses would have a credible say here. But there is very little research in that area, so there aren't many experts on it.
After 3 years at the same job (especially your first job), you'll likely be able to get a higher salary elsewhere.
Bought 1MORE BT per Wirecutter’s recommendation and I’ve had the exact same problem, complete with tinnitus tendencies. The minimum volume seems highest when connected to my iPad.
LiveViewJS[1] might be of interest. Same protocol as Phoenix LiveView with a JS/TS server implementation.

I was looking for something else after years in React ecosystem and came across Phoenix LiveView but I wanted to write in Typescript.

(Note: Am author)

[1] - https://LiveViewJS.com
None of the interpretations I heard of addresses a simple question: why don't we see hibbles and glorphs? For the context, please refer to an old article by Matthew Cook: http://www.paradise.caltech.edu/~cook/Workshop/Physics/QMQue...
On the other hand, there probably aren't very many neo-Puritans on board.

Whatever floats your boat, so to speak.
What project?

Do you mean polars reading Parquet into DuckDB to process that amount of data?
Pretty disappointing to see this on HN. it’s the weekend so quality is generally low but seriously this is what moderation is for. r/latestagecapitalism exists. Maybe take this trash over there.
Yes, it's more of a design problem of some of these libraries though.

Ideally, signalling shouldn't be retrofitted on normal variables.
It assumes then that you overload variable access (assignment and reads). Then it's hard to know which variables are reactive and which ones are not. The problem stems from the overloading of semantics.

A UI is mutable so it's not about mutable state being wrong but the unit of variability are not program variables but rendered props which are basically DOM Element properties.
In react, it just happens that it uses variables whose values are injected in the DOM elements via jsx but that's an issue (especially when dealing with exports, prop drilling etc)

So until a plain variable and a reactive variable are made to look different everywhere in code, it will remain confusing. And even then, it's not optimal.

Disclaimer: I'm currently implementing a cross-platform UI framework in Go and that's the reason why I had to think about it since traditional languages do not have reactive variables.
Funny. I find the short passage more telling than "Awesome, a masterpiece (John Doe)". But the short passage is rare and more "litterary". Usually, it’s a summary of the book (often written by the author himself/herself). Summary is, IMHO, the best way to judge a book. The worst being a summary that spoils the book (yeah, it happens…).
Florida courts could take 'emergency' custody of kids with trans relatives
While this is quite different to the usual content, I believe that sharing this information is important for members of our community and their families in order to prepare for the possible outcomes.

The title has been edited to fit.

The complete title is:

“Florida courts could take 'emergency' custody of kids with trans parents or siblings — even if they live in another state”