skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> It absolutely does come back? I've had major traffic headaches from returning trucks. If I don't build rail for trucks, my cities are usually screwed over by that.

Don't the trucks go into the Cargo station, and then disappear?

In OpenTTD, if you have a truck -> rail station, the truck drops items off, then have to return to Coal/Forests/whatever to pick up items again.

In Cities: Skylines, the truck hops onto the train, and then vanishes. Its been a while since I've played Skylines, maybe I'm mis-remembering?

> Trees create massive chokepoints when traveling within the city, so I don't think its likely to work in a large city (though if you squint, road hierarchy is somewhat tree-like, I suppose, though with more intra-branch connections). I suspect you simply haven't gotten cities big enough to actually have traffic, especially if you think most traffic is trucks. It does take a bit for personal car traffic to be heavy enough to be a problem.

Or maybe I'm just abusing the behavior of cargo stations too much.

The cargo-station "teleports" traffic somewhere else, and seems to magically erase return traffic. Use / abuse of cargo-stations seems key in making cities grow larger.

----------

EDIT: Ah, I misremembered. Seems like the return traffic does need to be accounted for. In any case, the industry -> Cargo Train terminal is really all you need to design against. With a proper industry block (or S-road / snake-like road), all industry goes to cargo train, and all of them return to industry, with no intersections potentially wrecking them.
I did not assert that PyPy is fast enough for anything.

Naturally V8 isn't fast enough, I also haven't said that.

What I said was that Python never had a proper JIT history, and Google doesn't care to improve V8 for nodejs workloads, so naturally it isn't fast enough.

I also said that FOSS community is not in the position to make otherwise, hence why it is easier to switch to compiled languages instead, no one has the capacity to make top JIT infrastructure with late nights and long weeks, paid with Github stars.
professionals don't get tricked into thinking a platform is ready for production use

If you don't have SLOs and SLAs, then you get what you get, essentially. Even a company with a great reputation can completely reverse course with a single bad incident, and you get nothing in return if there's not a contract.
Western academia has a bias towards defining religious institutions out of consideration as true academia. You see this in philosophy departments too where philosophers love to argue that Eastern philosophy is "more religion than philosophy" even though that statement is basically begging a whole host of questions about what religion and philosophy even is.

Religion, as an element of society that is discrete from our understandings of just how stuff in the world works, is a conception that was pretty unique to Christian civilization (and specifically Protestantism at that) which became generalized due to Western European cultural and economic dominance.

Most other times and places just didn't view them as being all that distinct. Their religious traditions didn't insist on strict separations between worldly pursuits and spiritual ones and often didn't really separate the formal institutions from each other. Most people would just adopt bits and pieces of all the various intellectual traditions from the priests and monks, but they'd adapt them into their personal or family practices. Normal people today would not try and identify themselves as "deontologists" or "utilitarians" today. They pick these ideas up from the nerds and applied them to their lives, but it wasn't really important for them to identify as one or another the way we insist folks split hairs as to whether they're Christian or Buddhist or Taoist or whatever now. These were intense (and sometimes violent) arguments among the intelligentsia, but not so much outside of that.
The new Google Docs and Drive UI starts rolling out today
> But what we really want is trust and agency.

Yup. One of the best PMs I've had the pleasure of working with secretly thought we were doomed, but she still gave us what we asked for and supported us all the way to success. When people trust you like that, you do all you can to not let them down.
I’m a Christian, it’s right in our Bible. God divided the nations. For most of the history of nations, division along ethnic and religious lines wasn’t controversial and was in fact the default. You’ll find large numbers of Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, and Buddhists among others who agree. Perhaps, the vast majority of all of them.

It might not sound that progressive but nobody ever told us what we’re progressing towards, that’s a whole separate problem though.
It's an effort vs benefit calculation. Can you say how much of that savings will translate to dollars in your pocket? In most large companies, we can't. And when you're in a company making tens of billions, a saving of $200K is rounding error.

Then there's the psychology of it: If enough other people work extra long hours to get those savings, they're not getting a larger bonus than me who isn't. When you scale this kind of reward incentive, what you'll get is most employees not bothering - they'll get the bonus anyway.
I find it a little odd to blame Roku for this $300k expense. What about the rest of the Internet that is only accessible via IPv4? As a service provider, isn't it _your job_ to connect people?

Looking at this blog post [1] (it's older though claims to be updated) there are still major websites like Amazon, Reddit and Zoom that do not offer IPv6 for their landing pages. Let's say Roku did support IPv6... Should these users just be told they can't use services like Amazon.com?

Don't get me wrong, Roku should support IPv6 and I have nothing against naming and shaming. But to suggest they're the only reason you need NAT services is just misleading.

[1] https://www.6connect.com/blog/ipv6-progress-report-top-sites...

Edit: Here's a more updated list that shows other sites like tiktok don't support IPv6 either. http://www.delong.com/ipv6_alexa500.html
Well yes, but that's a suboptimal hack.
I find it hilarious that EA had the concept down and just blew their opportunity with Simcity 2013 (always online (which by the way was actually not true, people cracked the online requirement within the first day or so), had to contract with other users for basic services like sewage and electricity), paving the way for competitors like Cities: Skylines to take the lead instead.

This reminds me of the same thing that happened with Stardew Valley, the creator missed the old Harvest Moon games, didn't find a suitable substitute, and just build the entirety of the game from scratch, teaching himself art and music composition too. He's made over $300 million in revenue so far and might be the first solo game dev (or even regular software dev) to hit $1 billion in the course of the game's existence.

It just goes to show that the dominant players are not always dominant forever, and that common YC startup advice of understanding what exactly users want (hint: they don't want always-online DRM-filled games that nickle and dime you with microtransactions (well, most people anyway, there are always gacha/gambling-type whale gamers)) and serving them well is still correct.
One answer: Politicized science.

As soon as science become politicized, it becomes rotten to the core. Science is weak because it must analyze all hypothesis, and masses of people can’t study all of them, while little groups of people with powerful decisions will always be perverted by interests.

Traditional societies are lead by traditions, but modern societies are driven by the ideal that science can measure everything. It sounds as stupid as architectural experiments of the 1960ies. As soon as science drives society, it becomes a tool of power, and the one who can pervert science can gain power.
I get what you're saying, and I've observed this too. I think there is a divide that few people consciously point out, which is there is a difference between programming as an artform and programming as a career. From a career perspective, all of those things matter, as an artform they're likely not important at all. It's not that caring about programming is vulgar, it's that most people are focused on career so the majority of the conversation is optimized around the metrics that matter for careerist goals.
Obviously not everyone called him a madman. Personally I found it weird to tie SMS 2FA to paid accounts.
Why would they want that? That seems delusional to me. What they want is all the normal things corporations are criticized for: short term returns, growth, employee productivity, etc.

Why would my organization VP want to "fucking own you and every aspect of your life"? That is extremely strong language, and I'm having a hard time taking it seriously.
Your first point is really the issue. NOAA extrapolates catch information into overall health of the species and uses that to issue permits, set quotas, and adjust fishing seasons. Not only did I help build some of the ship-board systems, I built a ton of data analysis tools on the back-end for NOAA.

Red Snapper in the Gulf of Mexico is a good example. NOAA will tell you we're devastating the species (boat captains would not agree!) and they adjust quotas and season start/stop dates based on catch info to help balance the business of fishing and the health of the species. It's a tough job because the captains are often at odds with the scientists.

It could be possible to sanitize the data and remove the position information, but they kind of need some general location to do some of the science.
> The problem arises when truth 2.0 becomes hypertrophic, self-righteous, rigid and unconnected with reality, which marks a transformation into ideology.

Ideology is the always a way of interpreting the Real into the Symbolic. If you don't think you have an ideology, congrats on having the dominate ideology. Ideology allows people to take the incomprehensible Real and distill it into the comprehensible Symbolic. The process itself is naively invisible in daily naive life. So much so, that the obviousness of it is reversed in order to justify the ideological process itself.

The author makes the uncritical assumption that his ontological conclusions exist as objective reality. And it's this confusion that is-and-ought are two sides of the same coin.

The whole 1.0 vs 2.0 conceptualization is a red herring based in a reactionary call to simpler times.
Requiring "trusted flaggers" should clash with freedom of press so i don't see this passing through parliaments.

Transparency of algorithms is unenforceable to irrelevant.

Things like "no personalized recommendations" are dead in the water- things like ai chat don't personalize, they just use the chat history, which can be stored locally.

Mandatory data sharing breaks international trade agreements

A lot of the other stuff is standard stuff that every website does

https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-...

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A...

There stuff in the regulation that is simply laughably worded:

>Providers of online platforms shall not design, organise or operate their online interfaces in a way that deceives or manipulates the recipients of their service or in a way that otherwise materially distorts or impairs the ability of the recipients of their service to make free and informed decisions.
Any of the hours OP listed are legally full time. Part time is less than 32/week.
I don’t get what you’re saying, this isn’t a brag disguised as a confession, they are actually admitting to poor performance, of course it’s to eventually make users trust them, but a) I don’t see nothing bad with that b) they are choosing the hard route.

They are being open and transparent (afaik) even if carefully worded, which I also don’t blame them for.
You could use a game trainer to limit how much money you receive. I usually do the opposite since I hate grinding in a game for virtual money or points, feels like a waste of time for me as compared to working on something cool in the real world.
It is a seasonal thing to take vacationers fishing. Charge $1000 a trip, maybe fish 80 days a year accounting for weather. After expenses there isn’t much left over. It is a labor of love. How much do you think people who guide people on backpacking camping trips earn?

I have been a mate on charter boats. My pay was $100 plus $100 expected tip. The workday was 14 hours long. Any fish caught couldn’t be sold commercially.

Taking people out fishing is not a lucrative career but it does provide work for people who lost their jobs commercial fishing.
The valuation is always extrinsic, and as such, a tacit cartel.

Property should depreciate. If you hear that it doesn't, there's a massive structural problem, likely one of the described above.

And these people using the property thinking they're gaining something are not doing anything about it, dooming their heritors.
This is probably therapy, but your message and fly.io's post resonates a lot with what I'm going through. I took a product owner role about 6 months ago, my first, with a company that has turned out to be just a mired mess, and a product universally hated both internally and externally.

Long story short, it's completely over-engineered by a bunch of intellectual engineers with no focus, no discipline, and no oversight. It ended up not delivering on any promises it made, and there were a lot of them.

I was warned left and right before presentations and meetings, "this customer hates your product because of ...." I started off every meeting with saying, "we're rearchitecting the product, this is how we're doing it, this is the tech we are using." Immediately there was a sense of relief from customers, followed by questions like, "why can't <current product> deliver <feature> that was promised?" I'm completely honest with bad decisions that were made and how it impacted the feature. Sure, there is skepticism on what we are doing, and I tell them they should absolutely be skeptical based on our track record. The result has been customers who have hated my product now offering to work with us on development.

I've also been completely forthcoming on configuration, security, resources, and setup issues I am finding, many of them are absolutely freakin' insane. I've flat out told customers it's frankly embarrassing and never let us do something like this in the future. The best feedback on this was, "At least you're telling us something. We usually get silence from this team."

God, this is the most depressing job ever.
I disagree, it is not really terrible, it is on par with i7 4770, i7 7700hq and even 10310u at two-four times less power consumed. 99% games are only needs 4 cores to achieve 60 fps, and apu is only limit for them at these extremely low TDP.
AMD put a decent apu for balance, and compare to 6800u with twice more cores and 1.5 more powerful apu, they only lose 10-20% while consuming 2 times less power.
Burden of proof is on you.
>Since DHCPv6 is apparently frowned upon by v6 purists, and not all devices on my network support it, that leaves SLAAC.

It's not a dichotomy between DHCPv6 and SLAAC. You can hard-coded addresses too. Since it's your homelab you presumably already know all the devices that will be connected. It's what I do.

You may not even need to hard-code the prefix everywhere. Eg with systemd-networkd you can configure the device as:

[Network]
IPv6AcceptRA=yes
[IPv6AcceptRA]
Token=static:::1:2:3:4

... which will give that interface the address $prefix::1:2:3:4 based on whatever $prefix was advertised by radvd. So the only place where you'd need to hard-code $prefix is in your DNS server.

>My question then is: is there some standard for the DNS server on the router to somehow know the v6 IPs of the hosts on the network

NDP discovery (`ip -6 neigh show`) will let you know about other IPs (and corresponding MAC addresses) on the link. It won't do anything for matching them up to DNS names.
Hey everyone

Demo here: https://youtu.be/9XQxygob9Bw

M.O.N.D.A.Y. is an AI asisstant as native macOS app, she:

Connects to tools you use via API and performs actions (sends emails etc.)
Has pre-build and custom prompts that you can add keyboard shortcuts to
Remembers your stuff and can recall it anytime
You can have conversations with her like ChatGPT
Has her own voice, you can communicate with Siri, shortcuts and she responds

Would you use it?

What actions would you like it to perform for you?

I put the waitlist on https://getmonday.app
Why can't code just be old? If it's stable, sustainable, and able to deliver on customer needs, then who cares? The only benefit at that point be to prevent people nitpicking that their code uses "var".
Have you found that it has helped your Hidradenitis suppurativa too?
For me, a lot of game choice comes down to: I build/plan/learn things all day. Sometimes I want to do that in a game, but often I'm looking for something that doesn't feel like that -- either because its a game style that taps into a very different kind of experience or because its one that I internalized so long ago that engagement feels pretty chill.

Learning a new sandbox's toolbox of system parts and laying out clever designs while I stare at a screen can read a lot like what I do with most of my weekdays, but without the return in pay or reputation.
The novel 2312, by Kim Stanley Robinson, explores this idea and has a fun chapter describing the process of hollowing out and terraforming an asteroid, using the ejecta to give it artificial gravity and a stable orbit in the solar system. Highly recommended.
> A lack of knowledge about cooking

Knowing how to cook doesn't solve the underlying problem driving someone to use food as a drug.

I had laid many pots of Boeuf Bourguinon on my family's dinner table before I started shoving Big Macs into my face every night when I hit rock bottom.
But this hasn't happened, it's the opinion of this person who wrote the article. That doesn't vindicate Musk
Came here to say pretty much this. Technical issues come and go; open communication is a core part of the company culture, and builds up trust.
Finally, ray-traced cities! I jest, but the Matrix demo on UE5 looked amazingly realistic.
This is incorrect. Using Semantic Versioning is the standard convention in Rust.
A single engineer brought down Twitter on Monday
These are unrelated.

Biosecurity has nothing to do with politics or religion. Any research needs to adhere to security levels in accordance with its risks. It does not matter if it's Nuclear Power or DNA editing, it must be secure and failures of the security protocols will cause mayhem to people of all political opinions.
In the course of these comments you've referred to me as deranged and laughable. I'm going to bow out and let you hold onto your opinions, it's clear you're not interested in a conversation.
I wouldn't be worried, the market for modern city builders is large enough to support a few of them, assuming they're distinctive enough. I'm kind of shocked nobody made an attempt to displace C:S in the last couple of years. Meanwhile we have hundreds of variants of The Settlers and Caesar.
> But in the US, cars are status symbols first and transportation second.

I really don’t believe this is true for the majority of buyers. I think most people are primarily buying based on the features they want: performance, comfort, space, technology, etc. Status is inextricably linked to what kind of car you drive, and it matters for some people more than others, but I don’t think it’s the foremost concern for most. At least not for myself and most of my friends and family.

Yes, people often buy more car than they actually need, but that is because they spend a lot of time driving and it makes them happy.
> These were religious schools

In an era where all philosophy, sociology & science was Religion, it sounds fairly comprehensive. All universities were religious. The west simply like to treat universities by and for Christian denominations as somehow devoid of religion.

> Bologna was the first multi-subject, public higher degree-granting institution in history. It invented the term "University"

You can use this self-fulfilling characterization for any topic to establish faux-authoritativeness. See -->> Stand up comedy was invented in the US. Rakugo[1] may have been invented before, has a single performer who weaves an original story through comedic scenarios, but they don't stand up. And after all, if they aren't standing up, is it stand up at all ? The limitations of one institution give it identity, while the limitations of the other render if unworthy. Hypocrisy at its finest.

Nalanda was a university in the spirit of what it means for an institution to be a university.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakugo
It was common in medieval Europe to name civil associations as "Universal guilds". It just means it was The Guild for that trade at that city.
I think I'd prefer something more similar to a Factorio setting (e.g. still top-down, but the camera actions/limited to your area as the "pedestrian").

However, I'd also like the insertion of balance against the "god" part too - like eminent domain costing goodwill or stability points. Too unstable or not enough goodwill, and the citizens start acting antagonist against the player on some level (e.g. higher crime/fraud, causing less taxes, protests, people leaving, etc)

Almost like city-state on some level, but less about the political compass and more about city government interacting with the local population.
I'm under the impression erb is much more like PHP. This is almost the inverse of erb, in a way.
When 20% of account holders pay for access, wake me up. It's not a trend until people actually spend money.
Turns out, building good _anything_ is profitable.
A single engineer brought down Twitter
They are just describing how computing works in an academic system if you’ve run out of HPC cluster credits and haven’t gotten a grant for a new system recently.
> Premium components

Mmmm. Guarantees I'll never touch this.
Or... stop being that kind of consumer. It has never been easier to go plant based.
My schneider 286@12Mhz from 1990 with 40MB huge hdd still running fine, all original components.
I wonder what the square footage of those median homes were in 1999 vs 2022.
I think it's more like: with the original GPT 3 model, it's easy to summon _any_ ego. With ChatGPT, you can either summon a) the intended Luigi or b) the unintended Waluigi, but trying to get anything else is more difficult. The theory would be that, in removing all the other egos other than Luigi, they've also indirectly promoted Waluigi
I remember the second in command of a rather esteemed starship remarking that somebody should be taking notes about how a blind man teaches an android to paint.
I have a symmetrical gig connection, ISP doesn't provide IPv6. Can route full line speed using their router, no matter if it's 1 device or 50 connected.

I don't know of a single game that supports IPv6, although some consoles might?
The serenity prayer and being a senior developer
"in mice"

or something like that.

The internet is about to get a lot more balkanized and more heavily regulated. That doesn't make it safer, it just puts government back in the driver's seat for who gets to decide what is allowed where, sans those messy election things.

> Proponents of the legislation say the bill will help bring an end to the era of tech companies’ self-regulating. “I don’t want the companies to decide what is and what isn’t forbidden without any separation of power, without any accountability, without any reporting, without any possibility to contest,” Verdier says. “It’s very dangerous.”
Please tell the legal department of our uni. I’m stuck with a home-made Kubernetes cluster where I have to mail the admins for provisioning, SSL and domain management. Would love to switch to Fly or Render