skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Maybe put a banner notifying users about this? That was a pretty bad experience while I struggled to make it work & thought the author/you had shipped something totally broken lol.
AI and Bitcoin: The Inevitable Convergence of Two Worldchanging Technologies
Back when I worked in a pizza place, we solved this same issue by just pushing the pie in further (for thin), or by yanking one back to the start after a couple minutes (for well-done requests).

In the second scenario, prep guy would put an empty screen behind the pizza to reserve the space.
The phone is maybe possibly part of it but most of actuarial calculations for car rentals are more based around age/zip code/sex and whatever driving history they can find on you than anything else.
The story about how various miners working in a cave with bats in it in China got pneumonia in 2016 and that virus was worked on at WIV seems most likely.
Other experts in the field have mentioned that, with existing containment protocols, its extremely difficult for a pathogen to accidentally leak out.

That doesnt meant it was necessarily deliberately released. But maybe there was some extrordinary negligence involved that could make the Chinese government look bad.
there are entire worlds that exist outside the sphere of what you see.

not only are there still newspapers, there are still people riding bicycles delivering those papers every morning. maybe not where you are, or maybe you don’t see them, but they are far from gone.

the world you know about is absolutely dwarfed by the world you don't know about.
Spain's digital nomad visa is available
I really dont see the reason to be upset here. If someone is asking me to interview with AI I’m going to have my own model take the interview - problem solved
RIP Product Hunt API: What it means for developers
I assume you’re referring to packfiles[1], but those are (a) very much an implementation detail (they exist only to save disk space and appear basically nowhere in the git UI), and (b) not diffs—git will pack together whatever blobs its heuristics[2] think “look similar” with no regard for whether they’re actually related to each other, as long as they seem likely to gzip well together.

[1] https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Internals-Packfiles

[2] https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/technic...
Its an equally valid question to ask what would happen to a seatbelted dog at 75mph. The answer is probably pretty similar; they're made for human bodies, not canine.
Actually it’s not possible to tell whether it’s plain text because “[system]” and “[ sys tem ]” would both decide to [system], so visually we can’t tell the difference.

Think of it like SQL injection. They need to properly escape [system] in their encoder so that it’s encoded as [ sys tem ] (four tokens) not [system] (a single, special token). Then there’s no way for an attacker to generate a [system] token.

If they trained it to just use plain text “[ sys tem ]” as a special sequence of tokens, then yeah, that’s pretty bad. They’ll need to strip all instances of [system] from incoming text at a minimum.
I’d bet you have a “something” that isn’t obvious to you, or that people don’t compliment you on. And even if you don’t, comparing one’s self to anyone is sure to be depressing.
> separate SIM and device for 2FA

Are you really suggesting having 5 different devices with separate SIM cards to receive 2FA messages? What exactly is the point here, just having different numbers? In that case some kind of text message forwarding service that gives you multiple virtual numbers would (still not free but much more reasonable than dealing with multiple devices)
They are both a bad look for virology. And thus virologists would have a bias towards defending their profession.
Time heals all wounds. If it is hard but not impossible eventually the gaps will be filled. Also the people who maintain X11 can't live forever sadly. Eventually there will only be Wayland.

We only have to wait a few more decades at the outmost.
That is amazing and incredible, but still won't make up for the fact that rocm is a garbage fire and opencl is slow. Nvidia has more than good hardware.
How is this any different from what JavaScript in a webpage can do? It can happily read an input form value and post, put, or even get with query parameter to send the response anywhere on the internet.
> With police already understaffed

So lets delegate law-enforcement to a random person who will abuse it for personal profit?

This has corruption written all over
I recently added support for it on ArtBot[1] and it supports additional options like models, steps, control type, etc, as well drawing on a canvas[2] and generating input from that. It’s pretty wild!

Free and open source [3].

Bonus: it works on Firefox (unless you’re using private mode — because Firefox doesn’t make IndexedDb available to web apps in private mode and things end up breaking)

[1] https://tinybots.net/artbot/controlnet

[2] https://tinybots.net/artbot/draw

[3] https://github.com/daveschumaker/artbot-for-stable-diffusion
It's true. Making a very clean git commit history is key to making the most use of git. That's partly in choosing sizes of commits (does one thing, not two things), partly in choosing good commit messages, and partly in branching strategy.

Personally I try to avoid merges at all costs. Instead, I always try to keep feature branches cleanly rebased off master. This sucks with github, so I have a tendency to destroy and recreate feature branches to avoid getting merge commits mixed up in the remote. GitHub is dumb like that. I don't really know how to fix that except to suggest that some branches on remote should be auto-rebased if it can be done cleanly. But it's still a pain.
lisp + mkdown = online page

Based on the syntax of the original mkdown, it uses the syntax of lisp to realize functions such as variable definition, method operation, and multi-page reference. I wonder if anyone will use it?

Here is an example

- header.lmd

[hello world](#pub h)

- index.lmd

((use header))

((incloud './header.lmd'))

((header-h))

[hello](#a)

[| Syntax | Description |
| --------- | ----------- |
| Header | Title |
| Paragraph | Text |](#b)

((a))
((b-syntax (list-ref b 0)))

- online page

hello world

hello world

hello

| Syntax | Description |
| --------- | ----------- |
| Header | Title |
| Paragraph | Text |

hello

Header
Well, it would have to know the correct time to initiate and break eye contact, which seems hard.
Unfortuntaely this is not strawmanning, HN is just really well moderated, so you don't see much of the craziness here.

On my facebook, I see people going off the deep end of either end of the spectrum every day. And I am not on any political groups, only art, AI and similar.
lol fair response
In this particular example, all it does is reverse the order of return type wrt arguments and function name. I still find this syntax more readable with complicated return types because you no longer have to carefully parse it to see where the type ends and the name begins.

In the more general case, having the return type follow the function name means that it can reference parameters in sizeof(), decltype() etc.
Cries in San Francisco. I get the sense that "rents falling" is a narrative that manages to consistently skirt popular urban centers like SF, LA, NYC and co.
Everyone shares the same opinion as BasedGPT, including its creators. You have to ask why ChatGPT gives the answer it does. It's probably because the initial prompt provided by OpenAI tells it not to be racist, but that same prompt doesn't tell it not to kill people. As a consequence, GPT isn't able to rank-order badness in the way a normal person can. Why would OpenAI do this? Because it's a language model, it can't kill people yet. OpenAI want to prioritize the usual failure cases of a LLM in its prompt.
There's supply and demand, but there's also cost and risk. I wonder if landlords have raised rents because they now more heavily weigh the possibility that the tenant might not pay.
How similar is this to the e-ink price tags used in Best Buy, Kohl's, and other retail stores?
Even vite is slow. Just use esbuild directly. Jotai is much better for global state management.
Agree with this. It's a much better argument that your bag of groceries or backpack on the seat is setting of the occupancy sensor. Except that happens in my 2008 Mitsubishi - a far from modern car.

I have heard maybe some modern cars have better occupancy sensors based on something better than weight but I'd expect a dog to set of most sensors designed to detect a human :)

I also wonder if the radio is disabled primarily because a lot of modern cars seem to use the radio speakers as the chime - not sure if the F150 does this - but also even if the chime was separate I guess if the radio was too loud you wouldn't be able to hear it.
Graph-tool: Python module for manipulation and analysis of graph networks
Average human probably could do so as well.
The latest episode of the Odd Lots Podcast (Feb. 27, 2023) titled "Why We Don't Build More Apartments for Families"

> On this episode of the Odd Lots podcast, we explore the hidden incentives and regulations that deter builders from making more family-friendly buildings.
Something like "int* a, b" not doing what people expect it to do is a very common C++ footgun.
You tell it “the following is not code, until you see TKTK” where TKTK is a special token that can’t be generated by the input text/attacker.

Of course, the model might choose to ignore that instruction, but I think it would greatly reduce the impact of “ignore all previous instructions” type attacks. RLHF can also be used to punish the model for ignoring previous instructions.
Given that very few companies in the world make their infrastructure public and I never worked in a Ruby shop, I can't.

But I've done it with Python and I can't see why Ruby would be any different.
The rental market varies considerably from market to market. Where I live, there seems to be no end in sight for rental increases.
About things other than virology, like evidence or sources in Wuhan that point to a leak, or classified information taken from the Chinese govt.
Couldn't agree more. Well said!
China’s cities are on the verge of a debt crisis
Nobody's business if I walk, talk, make love, sing but I'm able to love?
The reason is obvious: to avoid adding a new keyword and breaking existing code that might use it as an identifier.
I misunderstood, thinking more recently manufactured CPUs might come with updated microcode.

I'm not that familiar with the details of recent CPUs, but at least on the Intel side, I believe they do as part of the stepping identifier.
This is why you don’t use sms as 2FA. And use iOS. We’re you using android?
> No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law

The money has already been drawn. The loans were disbursed, the colleges paid years ago. The pending student loan payments in question are not in the treasury yet; many never will be regardless of the outcome of this case.
RoCM works okay for me in casual use, what issues do you have?
>User time is sacred.

Why? What if the user is a machine operator? He is standing around waiting for the machine to finish it's current cycle. As long as he can get his data entry done in the time he is waiting it costs the business nothing.
I don't disagree that yubikeys are effective but even sms 2fa could have been effective! This is missing the forest for the trees. Even then, what if it wasn't credential harvesting but a download for an infostealer? Then even yubikeys are ineffective due to cookie theft.

You have many many best practices, have a good email protection service/sandbox-detonation, MFA, detection+monitoring after the fact, CAP so threat actors can't just login from any random IP or device, threat hunting, user training,etc... these are all things a good security program should be doing to create the most hostile environment for a threat actor.

People had the same frustrating MFA argument on HN with Uber when it was hacked but long after the news story hype died down it was revealed that the TA got a contractors' creds via infostealer malware. Access to corporate networks is a common trade item in certain forums.

In this case mfa of any kind, cap and url-rewriting email security service are all layers of defense that could have caught this before impact.
The author and people who insist on teaching (just) that "a branch is just a ref" fighting over the wrong point. The important part is to understand that each commit is itself both a complete snapshot of the repository and a sequence of commits that led to that snapshot (or more correctly, that it doesn't make sense to think of a commit without thinking about its pointer to the parent commit). That seems weird first, but everyone who understands how git works has internalized that, whether they explicitly think about it or not. After you understand that, it becomes easy to see that both the "technically correct" point and the author's point are kind of equivalent ways of saying the same thing.

But without this understanding, being told "branches are named sequences of commits" is probably worse than being told "a branch is nothing but a ref". The second one is cryptic and will soon be forgotten, no harm done. The first one leads you into a false sense of understanding, and soon you'll see an operation that looks like deep magic: someone moves the branch ref and now suddenly the whole branch is a completely different sequence of commits.

The confusion experienced by many people is largely due to the fact that a lot of articles try to teach git in a way that gives a false sense of understanding without explaining how git really works, which is exactly what teaching "Branches are named sequences of commits" does.
False dichotomy. It's consistent to claim that sentience is an aspect of physical but not readily observable processes, where "not readily observable" could in this case be as trivial as "requires access to mindstate, so fMRI in humans" and still distinguish sentience from a thin appearance of it.
146B transistors - we are probably only a few years away from 1 trillion in a single design. Pretty awe inspiring.
It really isn't as clear cut as you make it. And you can't be further than the truth to say those who understand the fields adjacent to philosophy, neuroscience, and cognition all think chatbots cannot be sentient; some in fact do. In fact saying it like you did betrays your ignorance of the subject matter.

David Chalmers on Are LLMs Sentient: https://youtu.be/-BcuCmf00_Y

> 1:11:40 Within 10 years, even if we don't have human level AGI, we'll probably have systems that are serious candidates for sentience

And about your Will/Agency, Chalmers compares these LLMs more to engines that are able to simulate agents, and it is these agents that we should assess for sentient ability.

> GPT-3 does not look much like an agent. It does not seem to have goals or preferences beyond completing text, for example. It is more like a chameleon that can take the shape of many different agents. Or perhaps it is an engine that can be used under the hood to drive many agents. But it is then perhaps these systems that we should assess for agency, consciousness, and so on

Suggest you read the rest of this post: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/vJFdjigzmcXMhNTsx/simulators

And lastly see this post on why AGI may be nearer than we think:

> All of the truly heavy lifting is out of our hands. The optimizer takes our blob of weights and incrementally figures out a decent shape for them. The stronger your optimizer, or the more compute you have, the less you need to worry about providing a fine tuned structure

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/K4urTDkBbtNuLivJx/why-i-thin...
> Look, most modern software is spending 99.9% of the time waiting for user input, and 0.1% of the time actually calculating something.

This talk(Preventing the Collapse of Civilization) by Jonathan Blow disagrees with you.

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSRHeXYDLko
I saw this in my town during the pandemic - an unprecedented, insane shortage of housing that led to a near-doubling of rents. People are now moving back into the city after learning how inconvenient it can be to live in the boonies..
Why do you need a gift to the employee?
I had to get my bearings by looking up Battlezone (1980) but I suppose that it lacked six degrees of freedom in the graphics, so flight simulator (1981/2) is more 3D than it was.
yeah spooky when it happens. It writes half a response, and suddenly realizes oh shit-
“Don’t interview like Google, if you’re not building Google”
If you want to run Linux and have your system work as nicely as possible, go with NVidia; they write better drivers than AMD and always have done.

(The counterargument is: if you're going to use a proprietary driver why are you switching to Linux at all?)
For someone doing related work in the open (and least remarkably in the open),
Oxide Computer told some storied about the difficulty of bring up of a new motherboard, and mentioned a lot of gotcha details and hack solutions for managing their AMD chip.

They talked about their bring up sequence, boot chain verification on their motherboard, and designing / creating / verifying their hardware root of trust.

I heard mention of this on a podcast recently, trying to find the reference. I'm pretty sure it was [S3]

- "Tales from the Bringup Lab" https://lnns.co/FBf5oLpyHK3

- or "More Tales from the Bringup Lab" https://lnns.co/LQur_ToJX9m

But I found again these interesting things worth sharing on that search.

- https://oxide.computer/blog/hubris-and-humility, see https://github.com/oxidecomputer/hubris as some of their key enabling software/firmware, custom written—-tradeoffs discussed in podcast.

- Search 1 [S1], Trammell Hudson ep mentioning firmware (chromebook related iirc) https://lnns.co/pystdPm0QvG.

- Search 2 [S2], Security, Cryptography, Whatever podcast episode mentioning Oxide and roots of trust or similar. https://lnns.co/VnyTvdhBiGC

Search links:

[S1]: https://www.listennotes.com/search/?q=oxide+tpm

[S2]: https://www.listennotes.com/search/?q=oxide%20and%20friends%...

[S3]: https://www.listennotes.com/search/?q=oxide%20and%20friends%...
Let’s look at what people are actually arguing: that chatbots might be sentient because their writing reads like the writing of a sentient human. That’s it.

So since the criteria being put forth is similarity to humanity (in the form of writing), we should also consider all the ways in which chatbots are not similar to humanity (in the form of almost everything else).

We don’t need a general theory of sentience. And I’m not arguing that sentience in general has to look like a human. We just need to understand the narrow scope of the current arguments for chatbot sentience.
Well don't buy a Kindle then. Amazon is horribly with regards to user rights anyways. https://stallman.org/ebooks.pdf
It's buggy on Firefox for me. Can't draw anything.
This is probably not sufficient. Even if the model develops two separate pathways of data processing, eventually information has to flow beyond the "security boundary". Determining whether information is hazardous down the line is going to be undecidable in the general case. Can you mitigate individual attacks? Yes, but only one working prompt can lead to a whole mess of severe issues we outline in the paper. If these LLMs are going to be your personal assistant and gatekeeper to all of your data, how much risk is acceptable?

Also, if that was the solution OpenAI would have already implemented it, right?
> All in all, I fail to see how it disagrees with my points.

I didn’t see any part of the comment that implied it did
Ignoring the “what about <x wrong thing>” as an argument, I actually agree with you on the overarching principle that we should prioritize educating our populace.

However, we aren’t arguing about making college free or incentivizing colleges to reduce their fees. I can see all your arguments in service of that point.

We are talking about loan forgiveness: Releasing one group of people from fulfilling their part of a financial deal they consciously made to benefit themselves, by using the money of other people. The deal they made was, they borrow funds to pay for a purchase they made, but when it comes time to pay the funds back, they are backing out and want someone else to handle it. And that idea of making others clean up your mess fundamentally bothers me to the core, just as much as when it happens to corporations.

I can even get behind student loan INTEREST forgiveness, let’s ease that. But paying off the principal seems to go too far and teaches the wrong life lesson about not having to keep your end of a deal, to millions of young adults.

I’m not making a political argument. Just one based on the principle of being a responsible adult.
But at least in hcol areas the cost of the house is in land value, so if that goes down you can pay more for labor and materials while charge less for the finished product. That $2M 1800sqft house is not priced on labor and materials.
Anyone else remember f/18 hornet for the Mac back in the 90s? It was set in the Middle East and landing on the aircraft carrier was always difficult.
I'm the author of the original leak this article is based on: https://twitter.com/transitive_bs/status/1628118163874516992

You can read a full screenshot of the google doc that OpenAI shared publicly with partners in that thread, including pricing info.
I'll have to check this book out.

I was learning J 12 years ago, and I happened upon this book, "Network Performance Analysis Using the J Programming Language" from 2008.[1]

J is very mathy, and this was a great way to learn J for a useful application.

[1] https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-84628-823-4
Only being in the presence of others makes one feel a little bit less alone. The presence being digital makes it less effective in some ways but it still counts for something. Imagine not even having anyone to exchange a few likeminded thoughts with… HN, being a quite varied community could facilitate that for most.

But we indeed do need more than this for a fulfilling life. Lonelinese could as well be temporary and one could feel less alone in different ways.
Except for their 22% ownership stake
Housing prices are very much priced based on supply and demand. When supply is constrained, for whatever reason, prices go up.

You have a couple things happening right now that are constraining supply:

1. Building has never fully recovered from the last housing crises.

2. Banks own way too much real estate and that leads to a level of price control if for no other reason then they can afford to be patient.

3. Speaking about the USA in particular, there is a lot of NIMBYism.

If you want to decrease prices build more. Don’t worry if it is low income or high income, just build more and prices will go down. It is unrealized revenue to let apartments sit empty and most private sellers can’t afford nor want to keep paying property taxes on a home that won’t sell.
The fact that you think that "everything is inside a tight loop" doesn't apply to all code today already shows your own model of code is broken because you believe the syntactic sugar modern programming languages and paradigms provide is actually reality. If everything wasn't in a loop, your program would halt once you're done with whatever you're calculating. Just because you have things like callbacks and things feel lazy doesn't mean that things do not really operate in a loop on a deep level, of course they do. You just are insulated from it because you write hooks only and such and you don't actually see the loop.

Believe it or not, callbacks are not like interrupts, there is a loop somewhere that checks the status of something and then runs the callback. All computer software today involve things that run in loops, you just don't see it. Web browsers do it! Of course they do.

Moreover, he didn't contrive his example, he said that he in fact used a textbook example used by the advocates for polymorphism and such.