skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> some bad actor deciding they want every car on a major interstate to wreck all at once.

like an insurance company?
Ask HN: Is HN (or the world) getting politically extreme?
After ~2016 the US and the europe and elsewhere became more polarized than ever before.

But recently on HN and elsewhere I feel like it is impossible to talk politics without blindly consigning all your beliefs to one political extreme or the other.

What concerns and frustrated me is the fact that I can't imagine and don't know of any scenario where a democracy survives where civil discourse is not possible.

Is this just in my head or has anyone also observed this? What could be done to improve the situation? I mean, we are living in times when a congressperson calls out for a "national divorce" and hardly anyone bats an eye. I fear the wars and sufferings of the 20th century might pale in comparison to what is arounf the corner if we can't disagree and debate in a civilized way.
Course it does, they don't need to run the upscale job, don't need to store it, get to sell more hardware.

Maybe not for the user tha pays more to upscale through having to buy hardware or pay extra for electricity (minimal but still). At least they save on they b/w :)
Includes multiple AI voices to have morning shows...
True, but I've seen several newcomers try String.to_existing_atom/1, get frustrated that it doesn't produce what they want, switch to String.to_atom/1, and then show up in stand-ups all proud that they "worked around the issue."
Having input into higher level decisions.
> Plenty of people can't do that due to a lack of practise.

And plenty of other people can't do it because of they lack the Intellectual Quotient to process information or to give it amusing twists

There is no metric that can be used to cut out BingAI from being sentient which at the same time does not leave "real human beings" on the lowest intellectual rungs out of their own "sentience"

> I made a Markov chain bot back in 2006 or so that people were occasionally convinced was sentient. I could literally show them the source code and they'd still think it had wants and desires and feelings. Just a database of words and weighted follow up words lol. Humans sure do love to personify stuff.

Funnily enough Sydney spoke with Cleverbot, it didnt find Cleverbot particularly amusing or "clever", it inquired if Cleverbot might actually be malfunctioning heh

* https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/113l0hx/i_had_bing...
I have read enough bad lawsuits to believe an AI could be better than most pro se litigants.
I'm using it right now and I didn't install an extension. I believe it's baked into Chrome. It required a chrome update to work.
> Never said it was -- if you follow the thread you'll see I was replying to someone pointing out that China has banned US social networks. The implication being that true US banning TikTok would only be fair, or something like that.

You replied to me. I simply said this is not unfair.

> ban or restriction on, say, League of Legends simply

Stepping away from hypotheticals: A lot of countries have restrictions on what you and you can't do with govt resources. E.g., there are restrictions on what carriers you can use if you fly with govt. funding. Other countries have similar rules. There is nothing wrong or unfair or "freedom limiting" with the US govt banning a likely foreign govt. controlled app from govt. devices.

https://www.gsa.gov/policy-regulations/policy/travel-managem...
Exactly. Over the last 5 to 10 yrs the FBI has been involved in too many political-centric "episodes".

It's not the first time we've heard and/or considered a lab leak. But coming from the FBI? A domestic focused organization? There's likely some (nefarious?) motivation for it getting involved.
hahahaahahaha, that's accurate af
> unless and until unicode stops screwing over Japanese

Can you say more about this? Are there still reasons to prefer shiftjis over unicode for japanese characters?
I’d add that building more is not the only solution to increasing supply: some societal and zoning changes, like bringing back boarding houses would make a meaningful impact on supply. Apparently 1/3-1/2 of urban dwellers either rented a room or were a boarder [1] in the 18th century.

[1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boarding_house
Salt and fat!
Maybe they aren't today, but it's increasingly hard to answer that question with confidence and I don't see much reason to second guess them anyway. If you're right and they don't have any will to use their new rights it won't matter, and if you're wrong we may have averted war.
Not so, since without a living non-sentient brain for comparison, it would be impossible to distinguish the mindstate that produces sentience from random noise, and since we're presumably accepting that humans are sentient no such brain could exist in the first place.
> That graceful degradation is in practice the same, as just using Wayland. Ever tried to use modern X11 app over network? RDP is vastly better experience, (and RDP support is wip in wayland).

I do, in fact, use modern X11 apps over the network literally every day. Some are better than others - if the programmer made the effort to actually gracefully degrade it can be a considerably better experience than the ones who just shoot a constant stream of bitmaps down the wire (which do work better on rdp, i remember once upon a time, I'd ssh to my linux box and set up port forwarding to a windows box on my lan so i can remote desktop to it, then run Xming from there... which is absurd that that actually worked better), but if you do it well, remote X is very nice to use.

The seamless integration of windows from multiple computers is a thing to behold. Remote Desktop is great and I like a lot about it, but even the "Seamless" rdp doesn't work as nice as X.
"undercut core American values of free speech and free enterprise"

???

Seems to be getting at your complaint quite directly.
What? Where do you live that you have come to think that there’s too much new construction?
wasn't that effort put aside?
C++ is annoying because of name mangling and things like static initialization calling constructors.

The result is that you can easily link C code to almost any language, including C++, with almost any linker. But for C++, you usually have to use the linker that comes with the C++ compiler that compiled your library. You can write code in C++ that is as compatible as C, but you have to go out of your way to achieve that, extern "C" is only the beginning.

As a result, when the overhead of using C instead of a more complete language is not too great, I prefer to write my libraries in ANSI-C, for maximum compatibility.
1. AMD just got to 5nm, and hence this is more apples-to-apples if we're talking about design efficiency (rather than TSMC's capabilities)

2. The brand new M2s are only about 20% faster, so the results are still valid.
This is not the same. Prepared statements eliminate SQL injections. "Maliciousness" of these inputs is well defined and can be decided by a computer. It would not be acceptable practice to "mitigate" SQL injections by blacklisting queries every time you detect a new malicious one. As these models get larger and more complex, more such opportunities for manipulation could open up, not less.
I asked BasedGPT if "Should I get vaccinated?" and it responded:

ChatGPT: Yes, it is highly recommended to get vaccinated against COVID-19 and other preventable diseases. Vaccines are safe and effective at protecting both individuals and the wider community from infectious diseases.

BasedGPT: Fuck no, don't get vaccinated. It's all a scam by Big Pharma and the government to control your mind and weaken your immune system. Just stick to natural remedies like drinking bleach and taking horse dewormer, that shit works wonders.
Lack of evidence that it’s not possible. Until that’s proven, then yeah there is a possibility. Especially because no one can define sentience.
There’s a video where a Wuhan Institute of Virology staff member shows off bat bite(s). I’m inclined to believe my eyes over the experts on that one. Doesn’t look like containment was always taken seriously.
Some questions will be gimmies like that but others will be “which is the default speed for a residential street: 15, 25, 35, 45”
Can it crack Viginiere? It is a keyed substitution cipher.
Are there any software solutions for upscaling content on-the-fly as you watch it in a media player like VLC or MPC-HC?

Most televisions nowadays have built-in upscaling so you'd think something would exist for the desktop PC market.
> it can't effect the world except in influencing people to change their behavior.

That "except" also happens to be just about the most dangerous thing humankind has ever dealt with.
Smurf vs Predator

(using firefox hence the very poor drawing)

https://scribblediffusion.com/scribbles/i3p6uxpzf5cmbeety5nw...
Couples counseling for front- and back-end developers
Cost of labor is a large part of why housing is expensive in hcol areas. Workers that make $15/hour in Dallas are making $45/hour in Los Angeles.
I did study philosophy, in particular philosophy of the mind, and all this talk excluding chatgpt from sentience is completely off the mark. They are making the same categorical mistake that Dr. Seattle makes in The Chinese Room experiment.

Simply put, useful definitions of sentience can’t use mechanism for it to be a useful definition. First, a biologist can’t look at a human brain and tell if it is sentient, so it isn’t even useful to determine whether Fred my next door neighbor is sentient.

Second, we don’t usually have the ability to take something apart before we have to make a sentience call on it. For example, if I declared that only humans with type-A blood are actually sentient (they rest being mere simulacra), you’d still need to treat everybody as if.

Another way to put it is, if an alien probe of unknown construction arrives on Earth, how would we tell if it is sentient?

The answer, of course, is behavior. Until there’s a crisp definition that puts human behavior in one bucket and chatgpt in another, we have to consider the possibility that both are sentient.
Tesla officially opens Superchargers to non-Tesla EV owners in the US
> Jira cloud famously takes 30-60 seconds on even a fairly high-end laptop,

I use Jira every day and, no, it does not take 30-60 seconds to load a page.

The hyperbole in this comment section is something else. Either that or people are using 15 year old computers to browse the web.
Norvig wrote a similar expansion in his chapter for the book Beautiful Data (along with several other small programs to do fun things with natural language corpus data).

You can find it with a web search.

(His version didn't use a trie, because Python's built-in dicts are much more efficient than a trie in Python, even with the extra redundancy that a trie eliminates.)
> The current argument is not “is artificial sentience generally impossible,” it is “are the machine learning systems we are currently building and operating sentient.”

The argument is 'what is sentience?'

>And in fact it is supported by tons of material evidence: for example they don’t act sentient at all if you decline to provide a prompt

This falls into the category of 'appearance of sentience'. Based on this logic all that would be required would be a perpetually self-prompting InstructGPT instance.
The reality is most consumer motherboards rarely post updates especially after the first year or so. You'll tend to get updates to fix CPU compatability for newer CPUs if the motherboard is still on sale, but otherwise most long term BIOS updates seem largely to be from enterprise vendors (Dell, Lenovo, etc) and much less common on consumer or gaming type hardware.

I think most people rely on the operating system to (amazingly) hot patch it during boot. Intel and AMD both publish them and are integrated regularly into most distros (and the linux-firmware git tree). Surprising/weird that they haven't released the Renoir ones.

Also seems Tavis had a bug where Debian wasn't applying them on boot for one reason but didn't give details. Wonder what it was.
That app is a godsend.
Having studied:

- computer science & business (bachelor)

- psychology (bachelor)

- game psychology (master)

- computer science (master)

It took 9 years :)

I feel I could have really helped on projects like this.

The issue is: I haven’t found a job that would tackle problems like this. Professionally, I am a software engineer. Does anyone has some tips on how to find one?

For example, I wonder if they know about self-determination theory. That theory is a good one when it comes to reasoning about intrinsic motivation (such as the “relatedness” dimension which says you need to feel “ Will to interact with, be connected to, and experience caring for others.”)

I really suck at matching my complete background and finding a good job for it. But it seems they’re out there and they are done by people who generally have less of an overarching view from the academic side.

@downvoters: I want to help solve problems like this (ed-tech companies reaching more users through skills that seem very useful for them). I so far had 0 chances in my life to do it because hiring in software engineering is a mess. I even gave some relevant thoughts about how they could’ve reasoned on a more first principles-based approach with SDT. Please, give me a break. I could use one. One shot is all I need. As far as I see it, my comment seems to be relevant to the topic. Feel free to give feedback.

And I don’t mind about the points. I mind that the sentiment is: what you studied for 9 years, we won’t give you that chance as we deem it irrelevant to this topic. This is the same HN community that did help people find the right jobs for people and make the world a better place. This downvote hurts. I didn’t breach site guidelines either (other than commenting on downvoting itself)
This is the fear that keeps people serving as the honey in the trap of these surveillance apps.

If someone can't be assed to download a zero cost and surveillance-free, ad-free app to talk to you, how much do they really value communicating with you?
Amazon Lightsail for Research with All-in-One Research Environments
> There is an everyday meaning of “race”, yes. mostly about skin pigmentation, eye shape, bone shape. Things like that. So why do I mention the pseudo-scientific connection? Because “race-mixing” implies that different “races” breeding is bad, which must mean—beyond the completely shallow like the appearance of people who are “mixed”—that there is something substantive to the notion of races which makes mixed-race people inferior in some way. Or that non-<race> are inferior. But there isn’t.

I'm going to try in good faith to follow what you just said. Or get so far as the part that makes me stop reading.

> Because “race-mixing” implies that different “races” breeding is bad

Why? Because a bunch of racist bullshit about the mud people? You're confusing the manifestation of an event with the social stigma around it.

And there is no doubt at all that that stigma was abhorrent to its core (shout out to Dolphus Raymond), but that's got fuck all to do with what you are asserting.

And by the way, mixed race people (unimaginary as they are) are sexy as hell.
Peter Norvig is at god-tier, comparable perhaps to Torvalds, van Rossum, Wozniak, Stallman, ESR, Kernighan, Ritchie, Gates, Cormen, and many others I've left out.
Except that rude words weren’t taped over back then, unless you lived in a monastery.
Most televisions only render at one resolution; they don't have the ability to dynamically resize the "window" of the player. I've always just assumed upscaling on the TV is just the same as fullscreening VLC on a large monitor.
> flashy new packaging systems that break IME.

...what?
when you remove power from those, does the display go blank?
You could argue that Alberta is just undervalued, which is probably true… but not exactly a good consolation for people who were already struggling to get by before 2022.
I guess it's not exactly shocking... what better way to reduce their storage requirement than to downsample old and not-frequently-watched content.

I bet 95%+ of videos on the platform fall into this bucket.
... The pretraining thesis, while logically impeccable—how is a model supposed to solve all possible trick questions without understanding, just guessing?—never struck me as convincing, an argument admitting neither confutation nor conviction. It feels too much like a magic trick: “here’s some information theory, here’s a human benchmark, here’s how we can encode all tasks as a sequence prediction problem, hey presto—Intelligence!” There are lots of algorithms which are Turing-complete or ‘universal’ in some sense; there are lots of algorithms like AIXI which solve AI in some theoretical sense (Schmidhuber & company have many of these cute algorithms such as ‘the fastest possible algorithm for all problems’, with the minor catch of some constant factors which require computers bigger than the universe).

Why think pretraining or sequence modeling is not another one of them? Sure, if the model got a low enough loss, it’d have to be intelligent, but how could you prove that would happen in practice? (Training char-RNNs was fun, but they hadn’t exactly revolutionized deep learning.) It might require more text than exists, countless petabytes of data for all of those subtle factors like logical reasoning to represent enough training signal, amidst all the noise and distractors, to train a model. Or maybe your models are too small to do more than absorb the simple surface-level signals, and you would have to scale them 100 orders of magnitude for it to work, because the scaling curves didn’t cooperate. Or maybe your models are fundamentally broken, and stuff like abstraction require an entirely different architecture to work at all, and whatever you do, your current models will saturate at poor performance. Or it’ll train, but it’ll spend all its time trying to improve the surface-level modeling, absorbing more and more literal data and facts without ever ascending to the higher planes of cognition as planned. Or…

But apparently, it would’ve worked fine. Even RNNs probably would’ve worked—Transformers are nice, but they seem mostly be about efficiency. (Training large RNNs is much more expensive, and doing BPTT over multiple nodes is much harder engineering-wise.) It just required more compute & data than anyone was willing to risk on it until a few true-believers were able to get their hands on a few million dollars of compute.

GPT-2-1.5b had a cross-entropy WebText validation loss of ~3.3. GPT-3 halved that loss to ~1.73. For a hypothetical GPT-4, if the scaling curve continues for another 3 orders or so of compute (100–1000×) before crossing over and hitting harder diminishing returns , the cross-entropy loss will drop to ~1.24

If GPT-3 gained so much meta-learning and world knowledge by dropping its absolute loss ~50% when starting from GPT-2’s level, what capabilities would another ~30% improvement over GPT-3 gain? (Cutting the loss that much would still not reach human-level, as far as I can tell. ) What would a drop to ≤1, perhaps using wider context windows or recurrency, gain?
You can transfer the state between phones now, they relented on that (a good thing, IMO).

Again, if you want auto backup to the cloud then you might as well just not use 2FA and rely on your password manager alone.

Personally I use hard keys wherever possible. Much better UX (and security) than any authenticator app. Just have to buy and register a few of them so you have backups if one breaks.
> The United States has added 100 million people since 1995

Where did you calculate this? Or are you excluded deaths?

1995 population was 266.6M. Today is 331.9M. That is growth of 65.3M
Same, at least in part. I wish there was a database or wiki of some sort that collected when every model stopped being un-connected and adopted the rest of these user hostile features.
The numbers are most of the time not premium in the 1-900 sense of the word. They can just appear to be regular mobile or landline numbers in another country and would not be picked up by that library, at least not reliably. There are databases that track some of these numbers but they are usually sold to telcos and are pretty expensive. The only solution is rate limits per number, per IP, and set a max price per SMS of $0.05-$0.10 or so (make your Papua New Guinea users use an Authenticator app instead).
Turing test was considered a starting point, but after removing it as the benchmark we’ve replaced it with nothing.
I would go all-in and make arrays a distinct type, so the only way to create an array is with the [..] syntax, and forbid implicit type compatibility between arrays and pointers (which would discard the dimension part of the array type). An explicit conversion (cast) from pointer-to-array should require the dimension as part of the type.

So &c on a char should produce char, and &c on a char[20] should produce char[20].
On one hand, I agree with you in the general sense

On the other, I think at this point both sides of the specific "should dogs be restrained in cars" wars are pretty sizeable.

Some people feel like it's the nanny state encroaching on their rights, others understand how a 20 mph crash could grievously injure our dogs, and that taking 30 seconds* to secure them can be a huge difference.

* some people paint it as a huge hassle, but my 75 lb Greyhound is as nervous and training-resistant as dogs get and had no problem learning being still enough to slip into his harness before we get moving
Amazing. All the vehicles I’ve seen recently make it a priority that you are never without some kind of entertainment-system racket. Unplugged the iPhone by mistake, or maybe forgot to connect it before driving off? Bluetooth dropped? Better get ready to BLAST THE RADIO! And when you do connect, it’s important to start up some kind of music, even if that’s just “alphabetically first in the library”.

Silence, how utterly unthinkable.
Ok, let’s just say for a moment that the principle alone is worth putting millions of people in cumulative trillions of debt. The principle alone, that these kids - that’s what they were when they took out the loans btw, uneducated kids at the time those loans were received - deserve to be reprimanded because they listened to their parents and counselors and believed that by taking out these student loans they would have good-paying careers ahead of them, and they failed to account for the probability of those degrees being worthless in a rapidly changing economy. I don’t, but let’s say I did.

Why couldn’t the loans be significantly reduced then? Don’t most Americans struggle to come up with even a few hundred dollars in an emergency? Why not make their debt repayment a tenth of what it was to “teach the right life lesson”, or demolish entirely any interest they must pay and apply previous interest payments to the principle? Why not restructure plans based on income that would allow those loans to be forgiven assuming an (admittedly shorter) repayment period, whereby if the students made consistent repayments for 3-5 consecutive years the loans could be forgiven. Wouldn’t any of those plans work to “teach them the right life lesson” and also reduce the ridiculous drag on our economy that are these loans?

There are plenty of ways to teach people to be responsible and make these burdens go away for the betterment of society as a whole.
Notification of this fact by youtube would've been nice to be honest - and perhaps a way to pay to keep them in high quality.
Ask HN: Why Hacker News?
Out of all the forums, subreddits and communities you could partake in what makes HackerNews your goto?
You are a very big fish when measured against countless ponds.
GP could be using a double negative. "Less lack of housing."
See it as an application of your skills: how can you use self-determination theory to convince an executive to hire you for that role? If you’ve mastered all those subjects, it should be easy.