skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The situation is much more complex.

The first instance (that I still got on archive) of someone claiming that Hillary Clinton wanted to kill Assange occurred in Dec 18, 2010 by The Juice Media, a left-wing Australian company that produces comedic contemporary political and social satire videos. (https://youtu.be/hl4NlA97GeQ?t=237)

Then we have the case of Sigurdur “Siggi” Thordarson. In 2011 the FBI tried to recruit Sigurdur, who volunteered at wikileaks. "spy on associates of WikiLeaks, sow discord among its members, and steal their electronic devices" is a pretty fair description on what then occurred.

After Assange was granted asylum in 2012, the security company UC Global who was in charge of the building was also working with CIA.

The US embassy was also active in discussion with the Swedish prosecutors during this time about Assange and Wikileaks, which the Swedish government said "did not influence the case". The prosecutor did however break Swedish law in other ways, a fact found by the Swedish high court.

Also around this time there was a leaked document that I can't locate at this point, which showed plans for an extradition. Those where at the time dismissed as rumors, even if we know now that such plans were drafted and put into action in 2019.

All this time Hillary Clinton where United States Secretary of State, representing the United States to foreign countries. It is unclear how much responsibility she had over FBI and CIA, and with the extradition, but when it came to the cable gates a lot people assumed she was partially in charge of the US reaction in terms of foreign affiars. It is one of the main theories why Jualian Assange seemed to have a personal vendetta against Hillary Clinton 4 years later in 2016.

Hillary Clinton did also get the question if she, as the Secretary of State, ever discussed the assassination of Assange. Her answer was that she do not remember, but if she did so it would have been a joke. That did not reassure people.
Emacs+mu4e. Simple, plain text, programmable, direct link to my editor.
Awesome. Supply chain security is one of the most important pieces of modern security efforts. Tracking active vulnerabilities to cut through the noise is a super solid approach
I had watched a few courses on information security and noticed that those working in the more management / corporate related infosec roles seemed to be massively overweight, almost all of them (I am too, btw). Not saying that to shame anyone, just: Does the job make you miserable or stressed out?

I have been forced to do the infosec role as a "side thing" in a couple of jobs now, mainly because nobody else was around that even had the basic skills. One of the things that discouraged me from going further in that field is that it doesn't seem to make people all that happy and fulfilled. Again, I may be wrong on that, as an outsider looking in.
I don't know if these advice still applies en 2023, mostly because at least on the "web" side of development there are so many solutions/frameworks/libraries releasing that look exciting but there aren't enough problems to be solved solely through software development in our daily lives.

Till this day i don't know were can i fit svelte/solidjs/remix in my current development environment without introducing more problems than solving issues but there is a crowd of young developers that learn from bootcamps these tools and start solving all the problems with the same tech (like why is everyone using nextjs for static content like devdocs?).

Sometimes is good to ask for problems to be solved, its more satisfying and challenging helping someone else rather than making another guitar mixer software that is a problem solved inside another software (ableton), also helps a lot to develop your professional skills because at the workplace you won't be the one using the software and you learn a lot of how people use your/the software.
This news is shared as a banner within the Linode Manager interface with the following text:

"Effective 04/01/2023 the price of compute services will change by decreasing transfer fees and updating shared and dedicated plan rates. Read more."
I think the obvious conclusion here is that canonically Papermate is operating normally, releasing products on the same schedule as they did in the real world, until 2012 at least. Presumably they use the communication advantages endowed by superior writing instruments to weather the apocalypse.
Puzzles are great for learning tactics, but eventually you need to learn some strategy and positional play. You'll need to read a book or two for this. And don't forget endings!
I know people for whom what I described is the daily job.

Of course, the respective organization has to ensure that there do exist programmers who can maintain the software (but having to maintain it or adding new features from time to time is typically a lot less work than writing the original software from scratch).
OpenAI, if successful, will likely become the most valuable company in the history of the planet, both past and future.
The no.1 piece of advice I give to junior programmers now, or any programmer trying to improve, is to care about your code, everything else can naturally and more safely emerge from that one principle.

The problem with laying down a bunch of arbitrary rules is that they never apply to all scenarios. As the person coming up with the rules you can easily re-evaluate where and when they don't work, but the novice receiving those rules wont necessarily have an intuition for the reasoning behind them yet, and so wont so considerately apply them. For everyone else, they need to understand that there is no silver bullet, no 10 commandments that will give them the best result, life is messy, and they need to think, develop their own intuitions by interrogating their own code in each new context - but it all starts with caring about your code, not being satisfied with a pile of spaghetti, or a pile of OOP just because OOP, or a pile of strictly pure functions just because FP. Every single rule or programming pattern is wrong given enough contexts, it's all subjective.

Discussing patterns and rules is useful, but only if they are only used as a mental anchor to think about them, not some kind of axioms of programming correctness.
If they do no (which they don’t, by the way: often they’re happy you asked) what makes you think it is acceptable to do anyways?
I mostly do web development. Is there a UI framework that really nails this pop over and alignment problem that you have in mind?
Learn end games before opening s. Learn k+q against a k. Learn k+pawn against k (how to advance a pawn to promote to q). K+r against K. There are others but get those 3 down.
You are totally right!

I got hired because of an HN comment our founder saw. I told the story on the sister comment. Positions like this can only happen in startup level companies, where there is room for controlled chaos. Where founders can take chances and roll the dice with a hire.

I would have never made past the application process of a corporate software company, and a traditional HR might deem me to be unprofessional. I am very lucky to be in this position.
curl is basically a cli for libcurl.
Genuinely unsure why you think this. We're using an algorithm to edit sales meetings into highlight-reel videos.

There's no secret room full of people doing this work
A bit like hearing that your copilot's plan to stop the plane crash is to dive even steeper.

YouTube has always been a fair-weather friend, and the weather has been fair for a while. It does beg the question of how long it will be profitable to store these videos, and what the future of an online video archive looks like. For the past couple years I've been backing up channels I like to my NAS with yt-dlp. The ride was fun, and the utility was great, but I wouldn't take it for granted much longer. Storage is cheap right now, so I highly recommend starting your own backup if you want to keep this stuff post-YouTube too. With any luck, a user-sustained IPFS-style replacement might exist in a decade, and we can rebuild a public video archive the way it should have been.
Well yes, rural infrastructure is super inefficient compared to urban infrastructure.
Locale, in practice on the web, is mostly about language (fortunately!). I’m Dutch in NL and my browser (and OS!) is set to prefer en-US. Most of my friends do too. Dutch software UI translations are terribly cringey.

To me, that means I prefer English UI text but it doesn’t suddenly mean I want my units in arms and ounces and firestoves or whatever weird shit you Anglosaxons do :-)

I recognize that formally this is me breaking the locale model, but if so, then that’s a flaw in the design of locales and not a flaw in me. At the risk of ranting a bit, the idea that I can’t have a Color Picker named “Color Picker” without also bending over and accepting Fahrenheit is just weird to me. Lumping all this stuff together (don’t get me started on number formatting!) into a single 5-character language-and-region code is just dumb. The model assumes one dimensional einheitswurst humans who do as they’re told in primary school, never move away from their home town and never learn a second language. It sucks.

Let’s be happy so many websites get this right and treat locale as a language selector only.

(Meta sidenote, “Einheitswurst”, literally “unit sausage” but kinda also “unity sausage” which gives this word for dullness a delightful political angle, has got to be the second-best word in the German language)
I don't see how that can even be possible to argue for. If I close my eyes and put earplugs in when an ad is playing is that piracy? It's no different than blanking out an ad that my own personal computer is receiving when I don't feel like viewing or listening to something on it.

By the same logic if I don't feel like having my own computer send someone else's computer some metadata about my viewing experience then there is nothing they can do about it. My computer, my rules.
I’ve had it tell me that, when being pursued by ravenous wolves, I should open a discussion and attempt to find a mutually acceptable compromise with the wolves. Reminding it that wolves are unable to speak had no effect.
Cargo is hard-coded to use GitHub for the crates.io index [1]

[1] https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/blob/master/src/cargo/sou...
OpenAI CTO Mira Murati became one of tech’s most influential innovators
> performance doesn’t matter in 99.9% of apps

I don't think this is a sincere rebuttal at all.

In fact, it perversely proves the point. If 99.9% of apps aren't caring about performance - that's probably why my $2000 computer is slow to open a text file.

I want all of my applications to be well performant. Using the modern web is an atrocious experience most of the time. It's strange when I stumble upon a mostly-unchanged "web 2.0" era site. It loads instantly, like, shockingly fast. It doesn't have all the SPA widgets and "interactivity" but it works, loads extremely fast, and doesn't turn my computer's fans on.

My computer is several orders of magnitude faster than my computer from 2001. Yet the applications I want to use feel slower.

People say that programmer productivity is more important than efficiency, I don't think programmers are more productive. We've just lowered the bar.
Man, last night my levels jumped to 2,200. A major source looks to be the stove top as we made lentil soup. I also heard about windows: opening up the top and bottom to let hot air out and cold air in. Will try it out once we have 60º nights.
https://www.reddit.com/r/realestateinvesting/comments/11dnrl...

There's a few companies that sell data on stabilized units, units under construction, and units expected to deliver in the year.

I don't know of anyone that makes the data public - but maybe someone else does???
I think you should probably read up on Elon's statements about AI and you would probably realize that, at least from the statements, he doesn't trust AI and has deep concern about it (hence why he was part of OpenAI to keep watch over its progress).

The models used at Tesla are vastly different than the LLM models. There is nuance here.
The Pros of Letting Pandas Go Extinct
Holy hell, that's amazing!!
Study and practicing openings. By this I mean you should memorise all the lines of an opening; not just the main lines. A vast majority of matches are won/lost within 30-35 moves by a few botched up opening moves.

I don't recommend puzzles that much. They give you mental satisfaction. However, it is one thing to think of a good move knowing before hand that there's such a move possible but entirely different to recognise that you are in such a situation in the middle of a game.
Is curl the single most widely ported piece of software? I could imagine that being the case.
* train various endgames (undervalued) (e.g. Naroditsky’s videos on endgames: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLT1F2nOxLHOfQI_hFiDnnWj4l...)

* puzzles for tactics & mates

* learn 1 “easy to execute” opening for each color
Just write it in Word in the first place. Seems like org just adds a step to your process, and the benefit is nebulous. Further, regenerating in org destroys reviewer comments, which you should preserve until you are done iterating.
And don't forget to study end games too. I don't think you need a strong grasp of opening theory until you reach around 2000 (lichess).
There is also electron beam lithography which draws the lines one by one instead of illuminating an entire die in one exposure.
Doing it this is very dishonest and tells you a lot about what kind of people work at Akamai communications department.
For mediocre chess players like me I recommend trying online speed chess for a few months. Bullet chess where each player gets a minute total clock is a completely different game where you move every half second on average. Aggressive playing is rewarded - as long as you get your opponent to waste time thinking. The quick play allows you develop a better sense of positioning, game flow, and end game tactics. When you return to normal slow timed chess games after playing bullet for several months you will find that your clock management will be much improved.
That depends on how good you are already. Beginners progress most by learning not to hang pieces. Up to the ~1000 elo level you will win by simply not blundering with little to no opening theory. After that the breadth of scope opens up a lot. I got to ~1750 over the board almost completely ignoring openings beyond move 4 or 5. Watching videos on strategy, how should I be arranging my pieces / where do they "belong", and simple tactics will take you far. Openings are important, I study them more now, but I wouldn't get bogged down by them. Picking up an intuition for analysing a position and it's thematic ideas is key.
My reference to side hustle is his being a paid expert witness.

We have no idea of the details of the investigation, we just have his version vs. the university.

That’s why I say seems.
The Race to Nuclear Fusion Commercialisation
Reading this has made me realise that I am nowhere near as literate as I think I am.
Average tenure for a CISO is lowest of any C suite. You will likely take the hit in the event of a security incident and be fired. Tedious work. What to do is often obvious. Getting everyone to do it is the hard part and usually devolves into politics. Thankless job, you can only be wrong once. Just not appealing and CISO is becoming legally sketchy, requiring a lot of diligence out of a CISO to not end up in legal trouble. But if this appeals to you, it can be rewarding stuff, but it is not a great tech role IMO. Or a great management role.
Part of the "hmm" factor for me on this one is that these "anchor" and "anchor-size" functions really just seem like cute names for a more generic "get position of element" and "get size of element" functions. So it's a big departure from the way I always imagined CSS (a tree of styles where an element was affected mostly/completely only by its ancestors/siblings) vs this proposal cracking that model by letting styles interact between elements "horizontally" across different trees.

We already kind of did that with grid I guess. It feels like one step closer to imperative code in CSS rather than declarative, but I'll take it over JS to achieve this effect.
Throw in the resources needed for ships, civilian and military, civil infrastructure and the like, and you see why there is so little forest left in the Mediterranean. Plus, those things have to be replenished and rebuild over time, so it is not a one off.
Call me old fashioned, but my TV should display exactly what I tell it to display and precisely nothing else.
This is cool but I don't see neural stem cells grafting and this hydrogel have clinical applications in humans, because the brain is very difficult to access, even via the CSF (diffusion is very limited), without very invasive way like trepanation.

I think a more realistic clinical approach is astrocytes to neurons reprogramming using vectors like AAV9 to pass the blood brain barrier and activate genes to convert them [1] to different types based on the genes (NGN2: glutamatergic, ASCL1: GABAergic, dopaminergic, cholinergic...). This has the added benefit of reduced cancer risk (direct reprogramming) and astrocytes have a regional identity [2].

[1]: https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.15252/emmm.202114797
[2]: https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.abe8978
> No masters are sitting there counting TSAW TISP on their claws! I think this is misguided. A rigorous thought pattern is not a cage, it is an x ray. It shows our lion's bones. Strong players don't notice their thought patterns - you only notice bones when they're broken. The goal is not to think TSAW TISP in t, the goal is for good thought patterns to become so internalised that they form the skeleton our muscles hang on. Bones force our chess lion's muscles to work harmoniously - bones make it impossible for muscles to work any other way.

This is about helping new players figure this out. Or about helping players with poor time management figure out how to build that feeling and unlock the next level for themselves. “Play by feel” is unhelpful advice for those people and sometimes people are unable to get to the next level by themselves and need formal structures like this to figure out how to get better
Not with Dioxus. Everything is Rust there. It uses IPC to communicate with the webview and tell it what to draw. It is actually a very smart design. In addition (because WebView is just a Renderer), you can replace WebView with Terminal UI or Native UI
One of the use cases mentioned here is testing. One should also look at kind [1]. It is light weight, a really good candidate to setup dev environments.

[1] https://kind.sigs.k8s.io/
"Creepies Thing" because Swedish Ericsson made already their exchanges with super high level languages like Erlang.

Very embarrassing, but I could not move to Sweden, because unsolved tax issues from 1975.
> And it’s a malevolent spectre if you’re the 1% of users who actually use a niche feature in something, since developers will use that knowledge to take it away.

Yes, but also no. If my resources are not infinite, knowing that an "expensive-to-maintain" feature is used by just 1% of users, it is an incredibly important piece of information when I'm gonna have to decide where/how to recalibrate my (team's) effort.

Product managing is also this: I have to know what works and what doesn't. Maybe I will use that knowledge to understand how to increase the 1% to 5% with a specific business case. Maybe it won't make sense and I will have to decide if I can keep it or not.

I agree that vanity telemetry is bad for users, but killing ALL telemetry is bad for everybody.
writing in org just to export to markdown sounds very silly. what's the point? Emacs has markdown-mode.
I think wikipedia does a quite good job explaining what different operations do: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitwise_operation
While they are at it, bring back the old-school, analog dashboards that aren't fill with electronic crap you don't need (with the exception of the rear view camera -- that's useful). The best part about those dashes is you can operate them without looking at them. Also hand crank windows.
This isn’t universally true. Large tech companies have a need for specialists and are willing to pay quite well for it.
> now we are down to “place-self: center;”

`place-self` still requires the parent to be a flex-box container, though. You can't just apply it to an arbitrary element to make it center in its parent.

`place-self` is just shorthand for setting both `align-self` and `justify-self` in a single proeprty - I don't see how this is necessarily an improvement: CSS is already (unfortunately, necessarily) confusing at it is, so adding a literally redundant CSS property with a distinct name is not going to reduce confusion nor make CSS any more accessible.

CSS's shorthand properties work best when the shorthand version actually aids comprehension, rather than making you think: for example, `border: <width> <style> <color>;` and `margin: <top> <right> <bottom> <left>;` are great examples of how they should be: either because each parameter is unambiguously typed (in `border`'s case: widths, border-style and colors are very distinct) or uniformly-typed but follow a familiar pattern (e.g. `margin:`'s parameters are all length-values but are in a clockwise sequence) - this is not something we see in some of the more modern shorthand properties like `flex` and `box-shadow` where you need to have pre-memorized which parameter corresponds to each longhand property, e.g. it's non-obvious that the `2` in `flex: 1 2 3px` is for `flex-grow` - or that the `3px` in `box-shadow: 1px 2px 3px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.2);` is for `blur-radius` and not `spread-radius`.

> It’s good to see that the problem of anchoring tooltips is progressing through this process!

I'm also strongly in favour of this CSS feature, it's a long-time coming - BUUUUT I also really would have liked some browser-native tooltip/title feature that allows for rich-content without resorting to hacks like `foo[title]::after { position: absolute; content: attr(title); etc }`
Yes, in theory that all makes sense.

But in practice it's utterly ridiculous. I already do all this work to store passwords in a password manager.

Now I'm supposed to have an entire separate backup strategy for 2FA that depends on screenshotting QR codes or remembering to save their text equivalents? It's just crazy user-hostile.
I resorted to getting an external web cam with a small tripod so I can position the camera in the middle of my monitor.
Also it doesn't seem like such a leap to couple these language models with dedicated computation systems and similar. Think training a model to feed prompts to Wolfram Alpha to actually compute the results, then reporting back.
Why would someone use this vs dependabot? My gut tells me dependabot will be more accurate.
I was about say, literally WHAT? x2go destroys every other solution I've ever tried for this.
RX6900 don't even support GPU scheduling at first place. I don't have option like that there unfortunately.
That's a big yikes...
It uses IPC to give the WebView patches of what to do. There is a wee bit of JS there that parses the IPC and applies the patch to the DOM.

Here's the code:
https://github.com/DioxusLabs/dioxus/tree/master/packages/in...
What possible positive result could this have? It's going to be used to shame people out of conversations, exclusively.
If one watches Korean TV productions licensed on USA Netflix, almost everything that has to do with other media - games, books, music, movies, television including ads is blurred out, there's one called Reply 1988 that is full of 80s Korean references that are almost all blurred out so it's a kind of surreal experience - a viewer has to deduce what the characters are talking about from their conversations. A trailer for a Hong Kong movie is shown in the episodes in the background television set with a blur filter over the prop television set screen and even the poster is shown entirely blurred out in a character's room.