skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
At some point you would have to choose for which analysis you want unless you force the analysis onto everybody. Which means adding it into the build system. Which means separate commands.

The nice thing is that Zig conventions make things just work, because you could choose the command for your code base and third-party code would not need to care about your chosen build commands.

The "binary lsp" will give the necessary info of what has changed etc, so the info is (eventually) incremental with minimal overhead (only ipc + optional network latency).
It is a regulated industry. Compliance exists for a reason. As we have seen during the crypto fallout... ^-^
They’ve done DNA anaylsis before and it was something like 13% of men in history successfully reproduced before civilisation enforced monogamy. Like how most male pack animals don’t get to reproduce.
A not terrible solution is convert to PNG and check pixels up to some threshold, e.g., average pixel squared diff doesn't exceed 1e-4. Can also perform this test over windows to get a finer-grained view.
Hello! I created Civet ask me anything.

Or just curse me for keeping the dream of CoffeeScript alive :P
The insight with "every fucking bootstrap site" wasn't about sites having similar looks, it was about sites haplessly repeating the same design-forward look and feel.

Bootstrap invited sites to use huge full-bleed stock photos, carousels, colorful buttons, large icons, slide out menus, etc when none of that fancy design language actually resonated with the function of the site.

The desire wasn't to mock boring sites into hiring rockstar designers to make their designs even more unique and fashionable. It was for boring sites to lay off on the cheap whoopy doo design (because design-forward content is tiring when too familiar) and just present themselves clearly and without all the shitty pizazz.

This site does have that problem, but its remedy is basically the opposite of what you seem to be suggesting.
That just seems impossible to verify.

This system will just be abused until it's taken down.

You really just need actual enforcement of clear criminal cases to seriously manage the problem.
Meta builds A-team focused on AI products
Nice readability and blazing fast to me. That's awesome.

It reminded me of how good is the performance and design of the UK design system https://design-system.service.gov.uk/

Hope that at some point they can hire an illustrator to make some custom illustrations with more personality.
Yes. The hard part is having an "R2" which constantly searches from a back-pack with a painter scattering for cams which can then take offense/deffense that sees said cams and either paints with laser or chem-a-lized paint gun pellets with aluminum paste and epoxy mix... disabling both movement and measure.
A good amount of what gets into an ML or AI course, or book, is a couple matmuls and inversion.
Perceptual hashing exists.
While I don't disagree with the basic premise ("AI" as a specific falsifiable term is hard to pin down due to the ubiquity associated with the term); I do think there are specific cut-and-dry circumstances where the FTC could falsifiably prove your product does not include AI.

For example, using an alternative of Amazon's Mechanical Turk to process data is clearly a case where your product does not use AI. Which I believe is more likely the kind of scenario envisioned when the author was writing that sentence.
> Modern C++ has made big inroads into removing memory safety issues though

Modern C++ adds new features that allows you to write code that doesn't have as many memory safety problems, but all the unsafety (is that a word?) that existed in the past still exists.

Removing features that allows memory unsafety will probably never happen, because one of the main reasons people use C++ is all the legacy code will still be used for decades.

It's great that you can write C++ using only the newest features, and that does increase safety. But that doesn't offer the same guarantees of languages designed to simply not have these kinds of problems, or that by design flag the points in the code where safety can't be guaranteed by the compiler.
FTC is a regulator whose "principal mission is the enforcement of civil (non-criminal) antitrust law".

So it is completely fine for them to remind citizens and companies of their obligations.

Especially given in the AI space there is so much questionable behaviour going on.
Just shows what deserts our (sub)urban spaces have become to the local creatures
I'm 48, and tbh, I listen to some newer music and do spend some time seeking it out. A lot of commercial music is really contrived, formulaic, derivative and not much fun.

The loss of a lot of new music avenues really hurts things as well, the suggestion systems in many of today's streaming options don't match how Pandora was earlier on, and absolutely fails to bring in much new.

Curated content is all but dead as well... Many local stations are now automated bots and MTV became something else long, long ago now. I'm unlikely to go clubbing at this point in life either.

I think it's a general miss from industry trends and kind of wish that we could get more curated streams and content in place, in addition to introducing variability to feeds from the streaming sites/apps.
"Why does X Y when Z?"

Speak for yourself, hivemind Australian mainstream media, I listen to even more types of music now. I'm continually running out of space to put vinyl. I understand how some people resort to building built-in vinyl shelve rooms and lease warehouse space for it. There are dozens to hundreds of people with more than 500k records. I call it "organized hoarding." ;)
King – Man and Woman = King? (2019)
And evidently they lived longer than the median for their industry colleagues as well as the general population. So a couple of things could contribute: the healthiest of fit people were chosen, their jobs drove them to be healthier than their peers or somehow ingesting the stuff had a positive effect on them. The last one is dubious but without evidence to the contrary should be considered.
Hungarian actually had a language reform in the late 1800s to remove foreign words and replace them with pure Hungarian equivalents. These days though, quite a few loanwords have crept back in. I'm not sure if the Latin-based words actually came via French or via English. And there are very many Slavic loan words in Hungarian too, and some Germanic ones. My favorite loan word in Hungarian is "vásziszdász" from German "Was ist das?", it's used to mean deal, as in "not a big deal", "nem egy nagy vásziszdász".
Kindle Unlimited books are "free" books if you're paying for the subscription. It's similar to Netflix removing a show, you have no recourse because you never bought the show.
> reading Sam Altman’s twitter

He has made a pronounced and clear shift to a “thought leader” account after the OpenAI-MS investment.

That can only mean that OpenAI is dying.
Carving is very satisfying, but not very useful. If you stick to softer materials, a set of chisels or a pocketknife for whittling can be bought or made cheaply, and you can make a bunch of ugly (or maybe not) gifts to foist on friends and family. It's an often very repetitive and physical activity that is easy to get into but hard to master, perfect for tired brain/woke body days.
Yep that's a really good one. Not being blocked helps a lot for getting things done.
More disinformation regarding the Franc CFA, what a surprise… This bullshit has been going around for years. It’s an easy button to push for countries with an interest in destabilising North Africa.

The video is riddled with inaccuracies and straight up fabrications. For exemple, it states that CFA using countries have to pay interest to France on their deposits while it’s actually the opposite happening. France pays interests to these countries. It also states that France doesn’t disclose what it does with the money which is totally untrue. France does nothing with the money. It’s kept as a guaranty. You see the CFA Franc is pegged on the euro and France guaranties total convertibility. That’s why it’s used.

To reestablish a modicum of truth here, France certainly doesn’t own the countries using the Franc CFA. It’s just a money pegged to the Euro with a value guarantied by France. The BCEAO is fully independent. Multiple countries have started and quit using it since its creation. Leaving is very easy. The video conjures up a weird conspiracy surrounding Guinea leaving in the 70s but conveniently forget that Mauritania and Mali left without issues in the following years. Mali chose to rejoin a decade later as it was facing hyperinflation.

Of course, the euro being the unmitigated disaster that it is, using a money pegged to it is a terrible idea. But that’s also true for the poor European countries which were stupid enough to get stuck in a monetary union with and mostly benefiting Germany. Yes, the currency is stronger that it should be to help them exporting. It is stable however.

Edit: Currently sitting at zero. I will wear this downvote with pride. I will no leave this kind of rubbish propaganda stands. It only serves the interest of Russia which is currently selling operations by the Wagner group to some of these countries
Unihertz Atom 2.45 Inch Screen Rugged Smartphone
I'm not sure whether your replies here are more stupid, or more nasty. The two attributes are neck-in-neck thus far.

Not everyone is as selfish as you are. I'm a happy YIMBY, disappointed that the houses they're building on the corner are $900k+, hoping they build cheaper on the giant lot across the street from them.
That is extremely disingenuous. Google search is absolutely not AI-enabled in the same manner that ChatGPT and Phind are, and all of their attempts to develop that sort of functionality have crashed and burned.
Effective C

Chapter 1: Summoning Cthulhu
If you take "Modern" in the same vein as "Modern Art", then yes, I guess you could say it's "The Modern Way to write Typescript".
One of the hardest parts of learning to write for print is learning what's worth writing, especially when doing criticism. It's always helpful to ask who will be reading it, what they want, and what style best conveys it to them.

A lot of our professional norms contradict this. I get unnecessarily long emails every day, I sift through byzantine project structures as a profession, and I attend meetings that could have been an email -- all from people more senior than me.

If there's a message in what I'm saying, it's to question everything, especially in writing. If it makes more sense than what you're doing, write short emails, write short blog posts, write nothing at all.
> All the kids spend too much time online, so I'm not sure casting shade at them really gets us anywhere.

I'm not sure what you're talking about here. If anything I was "casting shade" at you for your remark about how terrible young men are. You're the one defending someone calling them "nasty/abusive/uninteresting/unintelligent/ugly".

> If you're not talking to boys about Andrew Tate because it hasn't come up (because it would be too cringe, as the kids say), don't worry, YouTube (reposts) have got you covered.

I talk to men in their early 20s to 40s mostly, the guys who go to my BJJ gym. I can promise you not one of them gives a shit about Andrew Tate's "HoW To bE aN aLpHa MaLe" grift. Half of them have probably never even heard of him.
> Unless part of your job is to figure out how and whether a data driven approach is even applicable, then this is can be a very depressing situation to be in.

You make a good point... what is your job? I suppose I've been coming at it from the perspective that it very much is a data scientist's job to figure that out. Sometimes the answer is, no, using ML for X use case is a waste of time. Or "no, there's a qualitative heuristic we can use that's better than some lengthy statistical process". At most serious orgs it's expected that "no, this is a waste of time" is a reasonable answer.

The issue of not having a support system is an orthogonal problem no? The reality is some companies and even teams within good companies don't offer that. So you have to learn how to navigate politics, etc. to get execs to buy into your vision/results/suggestions.
>Almost always the probably, almost certain answer to an essay like this is a "no."

Betteridge's law of headlines
I know the AccuWeather CEO, Barry Lee Myers, personally worked to try to push the NWS out of providing free weather data.
As you say - any computer program could be considered "AI". It's so ill defined that making the claim doesn't even mean anything.

The FTC is going to get hammered in a court if they ever try to test this.
U.S. Marshals Service suffers major security breach that compromises information
Help me come up with a better slogan and I'll use it.
It is not only appropriate but normal for regulators to try to affect behaviour without having to resort to enforcement activities.

And an informal blog post in a less-legalese tone is a welcome way to do this.
What if two people walk down the hall doing the same thing in different directions? ... Oh I forgot my slide rule ... !#FLASH#! ... what was that!? Oh shit.

Half joking. Is the material and spatial separation of a lab coat enough to prevent a reaction between two lumps of plutonium of sufficient combined critical mass? It might be since it's so bad at penetrating anything solid, but I don't know.
This is not a reminder. It's a casual threat.

And minor nit - this has nothing to do with antitrust. If you were going to highlight their mission, at least show the deceptive practices part.
How so? Would you care to expand a bit on your thesis?
hi dang, sorry to be annoying but i have no other way to reach you. I've contacted you at hn@ycombinator.com over my account but haven't received a reply. Did you receive my email? if not, please email me at the address in my account at your earliest convenience. thank you.
I don't think mentioning non-linearality means you can bypass the singularities you may cause typically CUSP, buckling etc and omit the analysis intentionally or negeliccantly.
I've sought out the songs from a lot of shows and movies over the years, so can only imagine others would do the same. Of course, a lot of the time, it's a single song by a given artist that I like, where most of the rest I could care less for.
Civets, they're nature's transpilers.
I immediately thought of Texas where it came to road rage.
I don't know why given all that open road!
[citation needed]

Try starting from a reasonable position.
English also seams to borrow heavily from latin for anything medical. The words in Spanish for your bones, bacteria, etc would all be recognizable to your doctor.
"sea of green" works if you get $1/gram for your produce. few crops command that price.
Thing with FOOF is you'd notice your bones dissolving almost immediately.

Poor old Karen Wetterhahn didn't even show symptoms for a year, from a milligram drop of it.
> Nowadays, whenever I see new content online, the first thing that I think about is whether it was created by an AI or a Human

That's just going to be the new normal. It means there will be more services that rely on reputation and trust, e.g. verified accounts and credentials. This isn't great news for HN. Unless there are some big changes, I think HN is going to drown in generated content that's indistinguishable from low to medium quality human-written content.
Eh. I have several grocery stores--and grocery departments--that I more or less favor for various reasons depending on what I'm buying. If one of them makes my life less pleasant whether because they're always moving stuff around, they overly rely on self-service, they tend to be crowded, or whatever--I'll probably go elsewhere. I do consider pricing but I don't really comparison shop so that only loosely factors in.
This is dumb but I'll take reckoner over computer, that word is wicked
Most regions do have tens of fruits and berries to choose from but some are hard to find. I don’t think most Apple or raspberry or peach trees are invasive so it’s not really that big of a deal to get some you like
No. Nuclear waste is mostly a fake problem. We don't need a permanent long term solution. The current solution is fine and will be fine for 100s of years.

If in a couple 100 years we still unable to figure out how to reprocess and use these thing, then maybe, maybe it worth thinking about it.
"Wondering" = discovery = you're going to have a bad time
Good thing it's open source, now I know how much I need to change the image in order for the hash to change!
To follow up on this, since we may still be talking past one another, I do not believe that the software design is deficient or that the disconnect between the implementation and actual use is nearly so large as the article makes it out to be. Taking the examples one by one:

> First ask yourself what we mean when we say “is your topic branch up to date?”

Does your local ref identify the same commit as the upstream ref?

> “be sure to fetch the dev branch”

Be sure to update your remote tracking branch ref to match the corresponding upstream ref and download all related commits.

> “what branch did I do that work on?”

Which branch(es) (which refs) point to commits with trees which contain that work?

> “is that commit on the main branch or the dev branch?”

Is that commit reachable by following the parent links from the main branch ref or the dev branch ref (or both)?

> “Has that work landed on the main branch?”

Is that work present in the tree of the commit identified by the main branch ref?

And then there is the last example which isn't even talking about branches in the version-control sense but rather the much older "split path" sense.

The documentation is fine. The way people talk about branches in the context of Git is (mostly) fine. It's only the author's understanding which is at odds with the reality of what branches are in the Git ecosystem. Which could possibly be due to trying to coerce Git into the mold of other version control systems with incompatible concepts of branching.
It isn't directly related, but a few years back my family purchased "Ready Race Rescue, Paw Patrol" on one of the major media platforms. This last week we wanted to watch it with our kids, or rather we wanted them to watch it so we could have 20 minutes of quiet. I went to turn it on and found out that it had been removed, but I could get access to it by purchasing a subscription to "Universal Unlimited" or something like that.

That sent me over the edge, I had purchased and paid to be able to view this and it had been taken from me. Something inside of me snapped and so now my house sails under the flag of the jolly roger, because it's the only way to really own something anymore.

So yo ho ho and a bottle of rum, me hearties.
Show HN: Generate regex patterns from examples
I've noticed many regex questions on StackOverflow include a list of examples for matching and non-matching text. This tool can help generate a regex pattern based on examples provided. It's a useful starting point for anyone struggling with regex [I think]. Any feedback is appreciated!
> Should be renamed really.

There’s SPOT = Single Point Of Truth [0], which fits better for this. When multiple pieces of code are to be kept in sync, it’s because they’re based on a shared truth. And that truth should be defined in a single place, and not have multiple copies that need to be kept in sync.

[0] https://wiki.c2.com/?SinglePointOfTruth
> if materials, labor etc is expensive, affordable housing may not be affordable either

San Francisco's problem is "a worker shortage, long waits for permits, restrictive zoning and high fees" [1]. Three out of four of those are direct results of planning rules. The first, related to the high cost of housing.

Issue permits quickly, loosen zoning and make fees low and predictable and you'll see affordable housing.

[1] https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/SF-is-one-of-the...
Here’s the statement I was responding to:

> dont see the benefit of these android based TV devices or Apple TV anymore.

My point was simply that an Apple TV is significantly cheaper ($100-120 vs. the $200+ PCs people mentioned) and it has roughly a factor of two better performance. Now, it’s inarguably less flexible but most of that flexibility doesn’t help with things many people want to do, which was the original point: people buy these because “spend less, everything you actually use just works” is actually a pretty good sales pitch.
> if you have a small piece of it, it is rather harmless given it is an alpha emitter and can be stopped via single sheet of paper.

Thing with alpha emitters is, if you get it on you the outer layers of skin will stop it before it does much damage. If you get it *in* you, where there's living tissue way closer to the surface like in your mouth or your lungs, it'll give you an absolute rip-roaring tumour.
I’ve never seen this series of paintings. Love it. Thanks for sharing.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Course_of_Empire_(painti...
From the same section,

- Any memory access must be done through a pointer value associated with an address range of the memory access, otherwise the behavior is undefined.

- A null pointer in the default address-space is associated with no address.

A null pointer (0x0) is associated with no address, therefore it has no address range. So if you do attempt a memory access (dereference), the behavior is undefined. QED. A naive translation to assembly would indeed segfault on a modern OS, but LLVM's optimizations are free to assume that code path is unreachable and do anything else.

Once the program is in this state, a bug of some kind is unavoidable. I don't take issue with that - what I take issue with is your claim that this behavior is well-defined, because it definitely is not. It would be equally valid for a null dereference to corrupt your program state or wipe your hard disk.
There are nurseries that specialize in native plants in most cities.. definitely in the Bay Area
At the end of the day using Bootstrap and Jquery is no different from using HTML, CSS and ES6 JS. They are just tools and anything you build with them can be replicated using other means.
Fascinating!

Here's a summary of his book from which this article seems to be taken.

https://rootsofprogress.org/devanney-on-the-nuclear-flop

The book is here: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1098308964
It's different now. When I was growing up in the 80s, music prior to the late Sixties was classified as "oldies" and only older people listened to it. Now, you hear people of all ages listening to music from the 1970s-1980s era -- stuff that's pushing fifty years old! -- and no one bats an eye.

I submit that this is happening because the newest popular music simply isn't as good as it used to be. It should be as weird to hear a teenager listening to Zeppelin and the Stones today as it would have been for my high-school friends in the mid-1980s to listen to Glenn Miller and Cab Calloway. But it's not.
Yeah, I like a lot of the language features here, especially:

- Everything is an expression

- Pattern matching

- Spread in any position

- Dedented strings/templates

However, I wouldn't use it, because the chance of it becoming abandonware that I just have to migrate off of later is way too high. I'll write a few extra TypeScript characters here and there for the stability.
Just me, or does this read like a Godfather-style warning?

"Nice AI product you got over there. Would be a shame if something happened to it."

But what's different about this AI product/hype cycle compared to every other cycle that tech has had? Why does the FTC feel the need to make proactive enforcement warnings about this one? What about crypto? Or going back further, the dotcom era?
> I'm not sure the connotation is desirable.

You'd think not, and yet ...
Signal CEO: We “1000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption
GPT is a voluble, entertaining bullshitter that is occasionally correct. It is not reliable, and for now, it cannot be made reliable.

It is a very impressive toy, but still just a toy for now.