skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If there was inflation crisis, it was probably less of a crisis than was reported at the time. At the time, the annual average inflation rate was reported to be 13%. In hindsight, it was probably more like 10%.
Are these calculations made/provided using metric units in American airports? If not, that's pretty much a death blow against doing them on-aircraft, as any international system has to support two different modes of ingesting data.

Edit: And even still, international regulations will vary and so the aircraft carrying two different sets of regulations seems complicated I would think?
You can’t bury patents, a patent is a public record. That’s the whole point of patents: an incentive to disclose your invention.

If we knew how to do this, but valid patents blocked the broader commercialization of it, then we would not be reading stories about breakthroughs in basic implementations. We’d be reading stories about how companies have products ready to go once the countdown timer hits zero.
By "cloud infra" you mean AWS cloud infra, right? https://github.com/iasql/iasql/blob/v0.1.1/package.json#L75-...
It doesn't seem that obvious to me. Cameras and computer software really blur the line.

A photo is a "mechanically produced work," and yet we still afford them copyright. If I put a camera in the middle of a busy shopping mall, set to capture images every 10 seconds, and them come back later and choose the top 5 images, I'm reasonably sure those would be granted copyright protection (If you disagree, replace that example with a timelapse of the sky).

I've played around with landscape photography, and I can confidently say that I've gotten some stunning photographs that were mainly luck and being in the right place at the right time. Conversely, I've spent multiple hours trying to wrangle Stable Diffusion into giving me the image I want through different prompts, generating VAEs / Hypernets, ControlNet, img2img, etc. If we were judging "creative effort", I'd argue the latter required significantly more on my part.

Likewise, if I take Blender 3D, and start creating a cityscape I'm pretty sure that would be considered for copyright. But what if part of that process is creating a python script that randomly selects a building object to place in a city block grid? Is that algorithmic work grounds for losing copyright? What if instead of a random choice, it does it according to some process of my design (1 story buildings can't go next to skyscrapers, etc)? What if it's a ML algo that takes feedback from me based on which ones I accept / reject? What if it cycles through a set for each position, and lets me press Y/N for the choice?

What setting up a bonsai in front of a white sheet and taking a photograph of it. Obviously, copyrightable. What about writing an algorithm that generates bonsai tree objects, and making a rendering of it? What about 3D printing it out, and then placing in where the real bonsai was, and taking a picture? I feel like I should have less claim to a copyright in the case of the bonsai photo (which I had zero input in growing or making) versus the 3D version (in which I created an algorithm to generate bonsai-like objects, which means it is "algorithmically created" and not worthy of a copyright).

It seems from my perspective that these works should be afforded copyright. There was at least a modicum of creative effort that went into the prompt selection, generation, and image choice. Enough that it meets the minimum effort that taking a random snapshot of a city street would require, for instance, and especially if effort was taken in generating the Hypernet / embedding, posing through ControlNet, etc. And more importantly, enough that the author decided it was interesting enough to keep and publish (and that a potential third-party also considers valuable enough to yoink a copy of). You've "created" / "discovered" / "put to paper" something that did not exist before, and which clearly has value.

I guess I'm having trouble understanding what the downsides of allowing these to be copyrighted are.
Personal reliability is a good thing.

Why should people be indemnified under the fictious umbrella of the corporation as juristic person?

This is a historic aberration that needs to end.

Truth or consequences!
Start with not forcing producer countries into disastrous trade agreements that upend their labor markets (especially in agriculture) and food sovereignty.
I am not agreeing or disagreeing with either of you. However, it seems you say

> You are wrong

But also:

> Many more people would find it offensive ... Is somehow a result of femaleness tout-court

But the person you're replying to seems to be saying that if there is some ingrained female-related cause, it couldn't be discussed today.

How does the second thing I quoted from you not directly agree with the comment you replied to?
>I've actually used ChatGPT and copilot and I can tell you it's not even 10% more productive

Use your imagination.

Do you think that LLMs have hit their plateau? Not likely I'd say. With all the billions suddenly rushing into the space, you really think that ChatGPT v.X isn't going to replace you? Risky bet.
Right. SCOTUS has created a Catch-22 with a twist of Kafka: one's right to redress only exists as long as someone else has successfully gotten the courts to decide that some other police violated the specific expression of the right one wants to exercise.
The contract has very clear language not to share it - likely because they are offering different prices to different companies.

(And as p1esk mentioned, there is no way you are getting H100s for under $100k).
quite a lot of my career has been writing - reference material and training courses, and a few short stories. apart from the latter, all of which were crap, my advice would be:

- know what you are writing about. it is very hard to write on a subject you have little knowledgr of

- pick an example that you have seen and found helpful (i chose MS c++ help - the old stuff not the new crap) and model your text on that

- if possible, get it reviewed, if it is a course then teach it from what you have written - the punters will not be kind to a badly-written course

- use professional grade tools, if you are doing this for real money - i used framemaker for most of my technical writing
The wording definitely intrigued me, and I understood the implied "given current models". I think sparking curiosity is more important than catering to someone who is not the target audience of a university news article.
Any SWEs working in this space. People at Nephra.ai are looking for people to develop for Potassium monitoring.
He's not dead yet. Maybe like Schopenhauer you feel he should never have been born at all. It takes all kinds. My kind likes to have a little fun with comments once in awhile.
Of course, if that be the case, then “small government” doesn’t mean “small government” either. :(
Yeah. These days I mostly do a lot of writing and a lot of editing. And I suspect I can sometimes coast a little bit because people assume that what I do (for me) is a lot harder than it actually is. Though it's never really easy and does involve a lot of pacing to get through some writing "problem."
I’m hosting mail servers for over a decade now. They are all very low frequency, so probably not a lot of attackers find them. I try to enable as many automatic updates as possible, because I don’t operate them professionally. Just every few months I check if all updates are installed, and if there is something wrong. So far I only had two hacked accounts (probably the users got phished or used compromised public PCs while logging in to webmail - the country of the attacker was the same where they were on holiday).

So far no break-ins that I noticed. But it is for sure possible that somebody broke in without me noticing (and did nothing worth noticing).
I would consider fire, seafaring, language, and clothes to absolutely be “technology” and they existed well before 5000 years ago.

And I think our version of seafaring, spacefaring, will be fruitful over a timescale of thousands of years, and maybe much shorter than that.

Our ancestors walked from Africa to the corners of the globe. Today, the cheapest and safest way to travel thousands of miles (as well as the most common) is to hurtle across the sky at nearly the speed of sound at altitudes that would kill you if not in a pressurized volume. The energy used for this, a round trip from one side of the globe to the other, is about the same as needed to place you in orbit (with hyper-optimized chemical rockets). I don’t see why we think the last ~50 years is the end of such progress of our technology.
Doctors publish case studies all the time which contain anonymized data. Presumably those go through reviews to make sure that nothing is being leaked but health data by it's nature is specific but not very personal (at least not identifiable).

Also, depending on what you're using ChatGPT for, this is no worse than Googling something which doctors do a lot as well.
Why would a letter to an insurance company on behalf of a patient not include PII? The letter itself is surely mostly PII. And is almost certain to contain privileged information.
Intel is installing high-NA lithography tools from ASML in their new fabs and should be able to manufacture 3nm chips soon. Unfortunately they’ll certainly reserve 100% of that capacity for themselves.
Paul Rusesabagina could not be reached for comment.
The name sounds like a pharmaceutical.

Cloudrizi (loxilb-io)
> Boys have more capacity to transcend social media's focus on image and beauty by finding other ways to be valued as human beings.

If we assume that there's really zero genetic involvement, and it's all just environment: If you treat girls like boys (have to achieve something to be valued, no inherent value), you'll get tougher girls and fewer issues with social media. But you'll also get more girls killing themselves and being violent towards others when they fail to achieve things that get them recognition.

Not sure if that's a huge improvement.

> What does it say about our society that we are not equipping girls and women in the same way?

The issue is with girls using social media, not with society somehow favoring boys and giving them all the great tools and what not. Boys are insulting each other in a shooter games or trolling people while girls are on social media. If one group hikes through a forest and another swims through a river and some of the latter drown, it's not the better equipment the hikers were given that kept them from drowning.
I once went to a talk at Berkeley's Revolution Books.

Fortunately, I doubt if they could topple a suburban HOA.

Edit: Revolution Books, not Revolution Cafe.
They are automatically treated like 501(c)(3)s however the application and annual filing process is waived ie your average 501(c)(3) has the IRS in its books a lot more actively than the average church. Its pretty plain that many churches are not playing by the rules even if most are. Why should they be special?

https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/churches-integrate...
These days we'd tap into the cell phone network/radio waves to track pedestrians. It's the modern safety reflector or high-visibility clothing.

Are you not carrying your phone with you? Well, "it would be a shame if something happened to you."
Does anyone know any books that talk about such topics?
> Even smaller no-name bay companies are starting to match on base salary (equity+bonus is harder to match).

FWIW- I see a lot of places with matching or better base than FANG, but it's precisely because the equity at FAANG is so high.

The only places I see with meaningfully higher pay than FAANG + hot tech companies of the day (ex. Doordash, Datadog, ...) are hedge funds. Curious if there is anywhere else
Estimates from 67 million simulations

After 9: 71.13%

p99.9: 29

Ran it up to 2 billion. Still holds, but no additional precision! It's somewhere around 71.134%, so it was threatening to round up for a bit.
What is solid about exim? Not only does it have more CVEs than any other mail transport agent (including four, all critical or high, just last year), they tend to respond by doing infamous things like releasing security patches on Christmas morning. I'm not the biggest fan of Haraka, but exim is easily the biggest security hassle you can ask for in an email server.
How many HPE staff does it take to pay for one CEO? 271
Granted. And those inconsistencies are not new.

I actually had an idea in undergrad (20+ years ago) to probe Hubble Constant variation using quasar reverberation mapping and very-long-baseline-interferometry. Then the professor I was working with pointed out that the baseline I needed was something like 100,000 times earth's orbital diameter.

Back then, one of the sexier ideas was that the universe might have locally different fundamental constants, and that variation could reveal some information about the higher-dimensional "space" that the universe existed inside of. I've been out of that field for a long time though, so I've no idea what the cutting edge is. I just know that the Big Bang theory is still pretty safe.

There are plenty of things wrong in the theory, but none of the evidence suggests that "expansion from a singularity" is wrong, let alone "infinite and eternal" is right.
> Half the month, in really dark places, the moon is sufficient

Came here to say this. Unfortunately, most people in urban environments have no idea. I spent literally decades walking at night in an area with no streetlights. Your eyes adjust to the dark, and anyone who comes along with a flashlight really annoys you.

Edit: I should note, that in all my time doing this, the only time I ever ran into a problem was when a herd of deer came running at me in the darkness. I don’t think a flashlight would have helped.
Because the from address can be forged, probably.
Thank you for the laffs =)
Ah, I'm not in the US so I avoided those ads.
That means bing bang happened long back and some our theories are wrong ! May be there is no dark matter !
I don't know why you're being a total dick about something that's actually pretty neat.
Tauri is not inherently faster. On the largest platform (Windows), Tauri scores similar performance numbers to Chromium. Why? Because it's still Blink under the hood, since the system browser is Edge.

The instances in which Tauri is faster are when you write your business logic in Rust and your frontend logic in JS.

Simply switching to Tauri will not instantly speed up your app.
Appreciate the call for more honest and open conversation about the practical challenges of data science, and I believe that we as a community can benefit greatly from sharing our experiences and lessons learned with each other.
why not vpn for the https services?
Maybe things will change as I get older (I'm in my early twenties)

It will. Men in their 20s are disadvantaged for the same reason that women in their 40s are: there's a lot more younger women dating older men than the reverse. The numbers will gradually shift in your favor over time.

And yeah, Tinder is usually a bad deal for everyone except the most attractive men, and women who prefer hookups to relationships.
All of your examples are clearly copyrightable, because in all of them, you were the one who created the works (and I assume that you're a human).

There's no legal ambiguity in any of your examples. The use of AI or any other sorts of tool to modify or improve your work doesn't alter that. This is clearly shown in legal precedents.
I'm happy to concede the detail here--my mistake. I was misinformed about union movie labor in New Mexico and Colorado. I have revised my worldview.

Nonetheless, firms move away from union labor where they can, to the point of relocating operations to do so. There is copious evidence of this.
This is progress for affordable housing.
It will increase with this 'equity' push in education as schools attempt to get rid of accelerated learning classes as well.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/04/us/california-math-curric...
Just another reminder of the disaster that previous presidents left for AMLO. Mexico’s security situation has steadily deteriorated since Vicente Fox tried to impress his buddy GWB by pursuing the idiotic “kingpin strategy” of the gringos.
Again - what difference does it make to your life, aside from empire-building, to have an extra $100m? Nothing. It's just greed.
Indeed: there were learnings on both sides. And more to it than I could fit into a short post.
Those eggs are available for me at the same price on Amazon Fresh. I live in Los Angeles.
> why this effect is more observable for girls than for boys

I'll take a stab at it:

1. During most of homo sapiens evolution as hunter gatherers, women were more likely to congregate in centralized groups while men hunted in small groups. It is documented that gossip is an integral activity among the women of a tribe moreso than their male counterparts. Without the inhibitions produced by in-person interaction, women gossiping on social media are more likely to produce negative interactions than their male counterparts who have a much lessened propensity to gossip.

2. From an evolutionary standpoint, a woman's reproductive fertility is closely associated with their appearance. Men are hardwired to pay close attention to a woman's looks whereas women are hardwired to care more about a man's ability to "protect and provide". Since social media promotes visibility of the most attractive women, this has the effect of reducing feelings of self-worth for the female users moreso than the male users.
Shower(-ish) thought: such cables are lasting and obvious artefacts for the future. These cables will stay where they are for eons. These Starlink satellites are like dragonflies. Once they are no longer continuosly replenished by new launches, they will disappear.
> Social media in and of itself is really just an accelerant for the particular set of social expectations we stack on girls and women around appearance and how that relates to self-worth. Boys have more capacity to transcend social media's focus on image and beauty by finding other ways to be valued as human beings.

Sounds like one of those truisms that people love to repeat. Like all other instances, this one likely isn't grounded in anything concrete
It is not "engineering" in the sense of having a certification to practice civil engineering or going to school to study electrical engineering if that's what you mean. If it's like being the engineer of a locomotive than maybe
> In countries with single-payer healthcare (or socialised healthcare), it's not true that it harms only the consumer.

This is a fallacy. Public health measures benefit some individuals more than others; but everyone benefits. Free treatment catches TB infections, for example, which occur overwhelmingly among homeless people. We're all better off if there are no homeless people wandering around with TB.

I'm glad my neighbours all benefit from the NHS, and that I'm not surrounded by sick people.
We should not accept topics which de facto exclude men.
Actually, probably just the standard expanding universe + light horizon.
The yellow lights were never brighter than the blue lights. And the hue matters.
does it support callbacks to handle semantic space languages like haskell and python?
> metaverse project, previously distracted by making a cryptocurrency

Crypto is of course 95% all a scam, but as crazy as it may look from the outside I think Zuckerberg was right on that one.

He didn't want to compete against the likes of all the crypto-bros and the other crypto scammers, there were no hundreds-of-billions to be made out of that, he wanted to compete against governments and central banks by actually instituting a "global" e-currency.

That's why a lot of central bankers and governments reacted immediately to Facebook's announcement, they knew what was at stake. If anyone could have technically accomplished that, on the private/non-government side, that was Facebook (or maybe Amazon, possibly Google). Of course many central banks and governments now want to implement the same "global" e-currency project that they were very quick to deny to Zuckerberg.
Canada Discovers Chinese Monitoring Buoys in Arctic Ocean
My Hill Country Fare Grade A Large Eggs (36 ct) from HEB cost $11.59 on Sunday. But that's from Instacart; maybe they tack on extra to each item? Same item on July 16 was $11.18, but that was 2x18ct at $5.59 each.
Pentagon warns troops eating poppy seeds could lead to failed drug tests
It doesn't have to be - couldn't descendants who are less adapted to the darkness by mutations survive if there's more light, and so on?
> I expect to be able to walk on sidewalks without a flashlight.

There are any number of ways to provide illumination that also mitigates light pollution. This generally means placing metal hats on any external light sources (vertical or horizontal) that effectively pushes the light down and minimizes leakage. The worst offenders in my area are the globular light sources that emit light in all directions.
As mentioned in another comment, the contract has very clear language not to share it - likely because they are offering different prices to different companies.

So I don't feel comfortable sharing any specifics, especially since this account is directly tied to my name.

With that being said, the negotiation process was pretty straightforward:
- Emailed several vendors telling them we are a small startup, we are looking to make many purchases, but right now we are starting with one. We told everyone our purchasing decision was solely based on cost (given equivalent hardware) and to please put your best quote forward.

- Got back all of our prices. Went to the second cheapest one and told them they were beat and offered them the ability to go lower, which they did. We went with that vendor.

- For our next purchase, we went to the original lowest vendor (who got beat out), told them they lost out to price, and if they can go lower than that we would go with them and continue to give them business moving forward. They went quite a bit lower than what they originally offered, and what the vendor we first purchased from gave. We bought our second order from them and have used them ever since.
Let’s be honest though. That would simply never work. You’d have to get a group of teen girls to make a pact to all be out of the loop. Not one of them can sneak a peek at social media!

Knowing what teens are like I’d say that experiment would last a week. Social media is addictive probably even more so for teens and fomo is real
Americans pay way way more for healthcare than any other country _because_ the prices of the medical resources are in private hands, in complete opossition to your claim that they would get "higher rates of return in private accounts": https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2... , and you can easily find that the countries with the most control, e.g. Denmark have the best healthcare while disallowing for-profit enterprises in anything healthcare related.
Key measures of bill to limit protest tactics defeated in House of Lords
I think this only becomes a problem if technology evolves faster than people change. All those "calculator" employees got better jobs. People keep making the analogy of how cars completely replaced horses (I used to as well) but horses can't fundamentally change what they are capable of.

Even if the technology does evolve faster than people, governments can make sure people don't get impacted. Coal plants are more expensive to operate, worse for the environment, and less efficient but the coal industry is still kicking along for better or for worse.
Optimizing Parallel Reduction in Metal for Apple M1
Whats the deal lately with turning verbs into nouns? Learnings, asks - come to mind, but I periodically hear others. It’s not drippy anymore to simply say lessons and questions, bros don’t find them lit?