skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It starts with that yes, but then I actually have an example question and feed it an "accurate" response based on the selected faith, in order to make the responses more direct, and in line with what we would like the response to sound like.

I'd like to train an LLM on the source books and accompanying texts over time. This is more of a proof of concept.
Huge for mobile stroke triage and ED prep.
Question:
Do you mean current as in movement of material, or current as in movement of electric fields?

Or is that not a valid distinction in this case?
This site might help you.

https://www.pure-gas.org/
VSCode Can Do More Than You Imagine
If true even a one or two day prison sentence for 5 or 6 Googlers would make sure this never happened again.

One assumes that if anyone had asked legal they would have been told they must switch off auto-delete. Lawyers aren't stupid they value their licence far more than their current job. I am highly doubtful there would be any written advice that said anything other than, if in doubt save.
How to weaponize the Yubikey (2019)
FWIW Ukraine is not in the EU.
Because one is protected from government in the Constitution. It literally says that the government cannot infringe on one's right to keep and bear arms. It doesn't say the government allows you to have them. It says the government cannot disallow you from having them.*

*Note: the government could disallow one from having them so long as that person goes through due process, at which point Constitutional restrictions placed upon the government are relaxed in specific areas.
Hey folks, author of the gist here. I’m a big fan of Benthos because, in my opinion, it’s the simplest version of unix philosophy applied to stream processing that adds on strong operational features (single go binary, metrics and tracing are free) and good delivery guarantees. I’ll be watching this post if you’d like to chat about any of that stuff :)
You are correct. I'd like to add trans data from different sources and to build it into a more of a robust study tool rather than an entertaining side project, which is pretty much what it is right now.
Even 10 years ago, while working at an online marketing agency, we started “happy hour” every Friday around 1pm. Many people unofficially left the office at noon. This was just considered “casual fridays” which sort of translated to “work if you want”.

Now I work for a company that doesn’t have official 4 day weeks but it’s well known you can tell your manager you won’t be working most fridays and so long as your productivity is reasonable, managers are happy to oblige. So it’s “4 day workweek if you want it”

I think ya, a lot more people work 4 days per week than any data collection would suggest
How convenient it is that, whenever capitalism has a negative effect, people rush to say "oh but its not real capitalism, they're doing it wrong. That would never happen"
Yeah man I was kinda trying to spoil as little as at all possible...
YouTube Premium is a large part of Google One. Which also includes Google Photos, Google Fi, Google Drive etc benefits.
You saying the manufacturers haven’t adapted anything for cars to run on E10 in the first place?
Planning for AGI and Beyond
Did you read the comment I replied to?
>ChatGPT doesn't "recommended"

I mean, you could say that about a person too, as you don't know how much that they are saying is bullshit.

For one, you are technically correct about ChatGPT not recommending. It cannot perform such action. On the other hand, from the POV of the questioner, it's hard not to feel being recommended something when you ask "What do you recommend" and it says "I recommend that...". You are, for some intents and purposes, being recommended something at that point.
Flatout Ultimate Carnage still is the most fun I get from arcade racing. I wish the devs would abandon the borefest that is Wreckfest and work on remastering FOUC instead.
But did you see the Year in Search video, it was so inspiring!
WHO says avian flu cases in humans ‘worrying’ after girl’s death in Cambodia
close to GAANG /s
If you leave something around long enough, it often ferments.

Sometimes the result smells ok.

Eventually somebody is curious enough to try it.
And are they not still mathematicians?
Modern art reminds me of cigar making.

An artist creating a new work of art has an idea of what he wants to do based on the materials available to him.

A cigar blender creating a new cigar has an idea of what he wants to do based on the raw materials available to him.

An artist will poke and prod at their creation, adding details until they are happy with their work, and then take a step back to determine if anything new needs to be added because making art is a very subjective process.

A cigar blender will combine tobacco he thinks will make a good cigar and also several other iterations using different blends because creating a cigar blend from scratch is a very subjective process.

An artist will put his work into a gallery, where it will be judged by critics who will attempt to assign meaning to the work even if no meaning actually exists.

A cigar blender will send his completed blend to reviewers where it will be judged by critics who will attempt to assign flavors to the cigar even if they're utterly ridiculous.

I think the main difference between the two is that the artist usually doesn't have to get his art to perform well. A cigar blender can't just make a cigar that tastes great, he also has to pay attention to how well the cigar burns. I used to get plenty of pre-release samples to get my thoughts from manufacturers I knew, and some of the best domestic stogies I've ever tasted burned like trash and had to be disregarded when choosing the final blend.
Yes, but written by ChatGPT.
Why are you continuing to argue when you clearly don't understand antitrust?
> Now you can reasonably dispute whether the Lessor employee carrying out day to day responsibilities actually has pricing responsibility

I do dispute it, because it even suggests later that "the dispute is often elevated to the Lessor’s management for resolution". It implies some percentage of these disputes don't bother getting elevated, probably because that user actually did have pricing authority and could just change the price. Most users of the system would not have this permission. Just like most employees at the checkout counter can't change the price without approval.

Do I agree this market is a bit strange for having these algorithmically generated prices? Sure. Should it be investigated for potentially illegal business practices? Sure. Is requiring a manager approval for changing the price from what those with pricing authority originally set it to, even if that price is essentially "auto", strange? No.
At least in the United States, it's well established that code is protected by freedom of speech. https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2008/04/21-40
It doesn't matter. "Every day employees" are not the ones who needed to do this.
If you have any particular examples in mind, and time to share them on https://github.com/google/jax/issues, we'd love to try to improve them. Improving error messages is a priority.

About introspection tools, at least for runtime value debugging there is to some extent a fundamental challenge: since jax.jit stages computation out of Python (though jax.grad and jax.vmap don't), it means standard Python runtime value inspection tools, like printing and pdb, can't work under a jax.jit as the values aren't available as the Python code is executing. You can always remove the jax.jit while debugging (or use `with jax.disable_jit(): ...`), but that's not always convenient, and we need jax.jit for good performance.

We recently added some runtime value debugging tools which work even with jax.jit-staged-out code (even in automatically parallelized code!), though they're not the standard introspection tools: see `jax.debug.print` and `jax.debug.breakpoint` on https://jax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/debugging/index.html and https://jax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/debugging/print_breakpo....

If you were thinking about other kinds of introspection tooling, I'd love to hear about it!
How many of those were defensive?
I've said it before and I'll say it again: the only evil to a capitalist is loss of capital. The "don't be evil" motto still applies. Just not the way that you're accustomed to reading it.
So far it’s only an agreement that needs to make its way into legislation of all other member states.

To approach this from a different angle — we have a euro7 norm that has been brewing for quite some time now and we still failed to come to an agreement. And there are talks now that the norm should also include production of EVs, electricity production and pollution from degrading brakes and tyres. Which is again stalling it even further.

So the reality might be that 2035 ban will be pushed further into the future as the date comes closer.
plain sight*
LLMs and the Emerging ML Tech Stack
Coordinated supply constraint to drive up prices is price fixing. Price fixing covers any coordinated behavior to affect a market price.
In the west, this is a big issue because feminism told women they can have it all. Turns out work doesn't leave much time for having kids. I think men actually have the same issue, though more because a lack of social safety net and capitalism drives them to produce rather than have balance in their lives.

Something's off with society and incentives, but I'm at a loss for how to fix it.
This is true, but they’re a lot more email servers that there are telco carriers. So it’s not entirely unwinnable.
It's disingenuous to make assumptions and argue without having made a good faith effort to see if what you're saying is true. 5 minutes of research would have taken you to the research paper in question, which has a straightforward description of the training data sources:

CommonCrawl 67.0%
C4 15.0%
Github 4.5%
Wikipedia 4.5%
Books 4.5%
ArXiv 2.5%
StackExchange 2.0%

So in other words, nothing here in this research has used people's social media posts, and there's no private data whatsoever because the sources used were all public.
I didn't express any view on the backtrack. It's very obvious they realized the move was unpopular and wanted to mollify their customers. As I mentioned above, nobody asked them to do this in the first place.

You seem to be projecting some idea of your own onto me.
Author is not rolling their own crypto. They are using libsodium.
I really hope so too, but from my perspective, Aptera has been in perpetual vaporware since at least 2006.

Yes, they evolved into something different now with the advent of EVs, but they still no product to show for all their efforts. And now that 90% of manufacturers have their own EV, I'm not sure Aptera's use case even exists anymore outside of an extremely narrow market niche.
> him saying they’re doing it to lock in Biden (their mainstream/establishment frontrunner) in large early primaries in 2024 (the next election) is not really different from saying they’re doing it to lock in their mainstream/establishment frontrunner in large early primaries in future elections

Yes, it is.

Because it refers to specific geographic strengths that Biden had as a candidate, not strengths that are uniformly typical of establishment-preferred Democratic candidates.

(Now if, instead of referring to Biden’s particular and unique strengths that correlate with the change, they had said that it was to lock in estanlishment candidates by moving some larger, more expensive states to campaign in forward, and that that establishment support was more key in campaigning in those states – a weak but at least superficially plausible argument – that would be different. But “states with a higner percentage of black voters” are…a different thing.
Replication: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication (disambiguation)

Replication_(scientific_method) -> Reproducibility
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducibility :

> Measures of reproducibility and repeatability: In chemistry, the terms reproducibility and repeatability are used with a specific quantitative meaning. [7] In inter-laboratory experiments, a concentration or other quantity of a chemical substance is measured repeatedly in different laboratories to assess the variability of the measurements. Then, the standard deviation of the difference between two values obtained within the same laboratory is called repeatability. The standard deviation for the difference between two measurement from different laboratories is called reproducibility. [8] These measures are related to the more general concept of variance components in metrology.

Replication (statistics) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_(statistics) :

> In engineering, science, and statistics, replication is the repetition of an experimental condition so that the variability associated with the phenomenon can be estimated. ASTM, in standard E1847, defines replication as "... the repetition of the set of all the treatment combinations to be compared in an experiment. Each of the repetitions is called a replicate."

> Replication is not the same as repeated measurements of the same item: they are dealt with differently in statistical experimental design and data analysis.

> For proper sampling, a process or batch of products should be in reasonable statistical control; inherent random variation is present but variation due to assignable (special) causes is not. Evaluation or testing of a single item does not allow for item-to-item variation and may not represent the batch or process. Replication is needed to account for this variation among items and treatments.

Accuracy and precision: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision :

> In simpler terms, given a statistical sample or set of data points from repeated measurements of the same quantity, the sample or set can be said to be accurate if their average is close to the true value of the quantity being measured, while the set can be said to be precise if their standard deviation is relatively small.

Reproducible builds; to isolate and minimize software variance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducible_builds

Re: reproducibility, containers, Jupyter books, REES, repo2docker:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32965961
https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/#comment-32965961 (Ctrl-F #linkedreproducibility)
That sounds like court ordered arbitration or court monitored arbitration. That's different from my experience and that lawyer's arbitration. The later is a arbitration you agreed to enter into when you entered into the civil contract. There's no motions filed between the parties nor the arbitrator to the court in those.
Damn, there goes my weekend. This is a fun project and looks like something I can actually make match my own needs.
There isn’t any shortage of ICs who genuinely think those things either. It often seems outside of the HN Overton Window to acknowledge that though.
> China opposes unilateral sanctions unauthorized by the UN Security Council.

Given that Russia has a permanent seat on the UN Security Council with veto power, this is basically making it impossible to sanction Russia.
It's not the travelling salesman - as per the description it's an unweighted graph.

This reduces the problem from finding the shortest hamiltonian cycle to finding any such cycle.
Cory Doctorow calls this "Enshittification":

> Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.

https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/

I think your idea of this happening in a cycle, with the company switching back to diverting its surplus back to its customers at the end before going back around again is an interesting one. I don't doubt it's possible, and that some companies have pulled it off from time to time. But the ability to win back trust from customers are you've spent two phases of the cycle abusing them seems like a tough hill to climb, and I think it's likely a lot of companies will fail there.

It's probably easiest for a company at the end of the cycle, to be acquired by a new up-and-comer who is still on its first round of diverting surpluses to its customers, to best leave its toxic reputation behind.
We're doing it to pump corn prices. Also energy independence from pre fracking days.
First, it's not one employee, but many employees. Second, if after all that has happened in the last 4 months you're an employee who is not "disgruntled", something's wrong with you.
One thing that I've experienced is making Friday a "non essential work" work day. Its a day to do small tasks that have piled up over the week, do some clean up, and otherwise try and figure out what the next week looks like.

What made this really work IMO is that if someone needed to sync on something or get a context download Fridays became the day to do it because no one would have an excuse to not do some knowledge sharing. Toss in grabbing lunch and coffee with other coworkers and it ends up being a great way to build company cohesion and foster cross-team/org relationships.

And, if you decide to leave after lunch to play tennis no one is going to give you the side eye.
Well, in that case neither does the justice department for the last three decades since none of them have agreed with HN lawyers theories...
Ha! Interesting. Thanks for that, I stand corrected.
Wow, this was very cool. I don’t do anything with hardware / electronics, but it is so fun watching someone talented breakdown and solve each challenge like that. Similar to how I enjoy watching someone do a tutorial on Ruby on Rails or JS. I’d love to learn more about hacking things like that.
Ericsson too, maybe not in Europe but can be in Canada. Anyways looking at Ericson employees stats on Linkedin, most them of the are in India now(29K in India and 19K in Sweden).
Nurses make a lot of money, especially the more specialized and senior ones. CRNAs make more than most software developers. Just about any NP will make over $100k/yr. It's kind of weird to group them together with the retail employee making $9/hr folding shirts or the server making $3.75/hr plus tips at some dive in the middle of nowhere.

We do this weird thing in the US where you are tied so intrinsically to what you do for a living that it's become taboo to say the objectively true (and I would argue, very obvious) thing that some jobs are worth more than others. It's not a bad thing that one person gets paid $200k/yr to type JS into a computer and someone else gets paid $9/hr to fold clothes at Boscov's. It's because anyone can walk in off the street and start folding clothes with no training. That isn't making any comment on the people behind those jobs, just the jobs themselves.
Portal (2007) is timeless. Chess (600) has also held up pretty well.
That's an interesting point that got me thinking already:

No, I wasn't aware of that when painting most of the pictures. I just enjoyed the process of painting. But, as you can imagine, wall space gets limited after painting number 25, and at some point they were hanging in the staircase, all the way down to our basement. So I thought about selling them.

That was the point when I thought that I'd love to mark them as painted without any intent. That was before picture 25, I'd say.

Now, number 26 was painted KNOWING that I'd be marking it as painted without anything in mind, which somehow (same for all upcoming pictures) increases the 'pressure' of not adding any meaning.

Until now, I'm comfortable with that (the painting process is so much fun), and it's probably a thing worth exploring further. Perhaps I could write something contradictory on the front?
From reading your comments, it appears like you have confused having a competitive advantage with anti-competitive practices. Just because YouTube has access to cheap resources by its parent does not prevent a competitor from existing in or entering the market. Facebook, Instagram, Tik Tok are doing just fine without access to Google's resources. There are other practices that Google does which might fit the bill (e.g. ranking and prominence in search results, Android, etc.), but this isn't one of them.
where do they get such skilled people?
Brother, there are always new marks.
I could buy some electric car and stick solar cells all over the roof. Plus some wiring and a charge controller. That would be about a day's work.

If one day I need a car that can, say, play music for days at a festival in the summer, I'll do that.

Of course, to improve the range of the car with it, it wouldn't be worth it. The expense of a whole working day would be far too expensive for that.

I think solar cars are a scam. The victims are these investors with a good heart (save the planet!) but no clue at all about engineering or science.
> Mac has dtrace that we will integrate.

But won't this require your target users turning off SIP [1] on Macs to enable dtrace? A lot of dtrace tools require SIP to be disabled before they can produce any meaningful output.

1: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/security/disabling...
I have this impression of vmware that they’re more focused on enterprise sales relationships than tech, a la Salesforce, Oracle, et al. I use Fusion to run VMs on macOS but that’s a toy, I wouldn’t build critical infrastructure on their tools. Just a feeling, but my intuition is based on a lot of experience.
Appreciate the willingness to raise these issues but Canonical has flat out rejected the idea of allowing sysadmins to disable automatic updates and run them during an arbitrary maintenance window. They offered up a mechanism to defer automatic updates to occur within specific windows but that does nothing to alleviate the problems for critical services run as snap packages that require coordination with other parts of the fleet. Additionally, you have to configure snap on each system ahead of time for a maintenance window to take advantage of that feature and of course any system changes have to have their own maintenance windows and change process paperwork so now you have 2x the amount of work to do just because Canonical thinks they are in the right.

The home directory pollution problem was pointed out by many people at the very beginning of the project specifically complaining that that needed to change immediately because of the concern of that decision becoming ossified into the codebase. The developers promised to look into it and now here we are almost a decade later with that stupid directory still polluting home directories because now it's too hard to revisit and would break too many things. :-/

Finally, the whole issue with snapd not explicitly logging package updates and other actions to OS facilities (that can be forwarded to security services) in favor of its own internal log that it self-purges every 72 hours is just pure insanity. There is simply no way having snapd running in any sort of regulated environment would ever pass an audit.
BX, v sbhaq gur cbqpnfg jvgu yrk gnyxvat gb znegva nobhg fcnpr, ohg v gevrq gur jbeqf ng gung znex, fgvyy abguvat.
This really benefits when you first connect a client to a server that has to sync all the mail locally, and partially each time the client starts that has to check all the folders for new messages. But realistically when a client is opened (that is when you turn on the computer till you turn it off, if you turn it off and don't put it to sleep). Also most people has only a few folders, say less than 10.
Just like the regular layoff emails
You're on to something there. Keep digging. Perhaps you'll come to the truth of the matter that the USA's political system is undemocratic to no end.
Lovely story. The same still happens today for any commercial artwork (game artwork, film artwork, products and advertising). It usually goes out to pitch, agency teams, contractors or subcontractors do the work, it goes through many many revisions agency side, then client side make amends, and many weeks later you end up with something. Ownership of any single piece of it is very grey.