skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
AGIs should basically by definition be able to replace humans[1], so yes, when we get good enough AGIs that will happen.

GPT4 won't be an AGI of course, but it still could have a massive impact on the job market. A single engineer with GPT4 could potentially do the work of 10 engineers right now.

Edit: To be clear, I used GPT4 as a placeholder for "some near future LLM". I'm not making any bets on GPT4 in particular.

[1] See "The employment test" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_general_intelligenc...
If it is intentional, I would guess it’s more likely general intended to scare Vietnam into accepting island territorial claims
A Tesla?
I was referring to how most games never supported the broadband adapter. Compatibility list: https://segaretro.org/Broadband_Adapter. I'm old so I bought mine on launch day(s) both US & JP. BBA in 2000.
No I am just wondering why is this largely ignored
And spending time even if it's ostensibly "your" time outside of your core job on something that no one up your management chain cares about, or worse actively disapproves of you working on, isn't the best place to be in.
> "dark matter" doesn't interact with ordinary matter, except gravitationally.

It's possible that this is the case, but particles that also interact with the weak force (hence WIMPs: weakly interacting massive particles) are generally considered better candidates.
I think Trump's idea was to "hit the body with a tremendous light... inside the body"
goweight: A tool to analyze and troubleshoot a Go binary size
Anecdotal, but dating apps sure helped crush the self-esteem of my sister.

She still gets on them occasionally, because there's no alternative now.

Guys in the post-#metoo era just won't approach a girl at a bar the way they used to.
> Profit.

Well yes, but also substantial life saving interventions become possible.
I know a competitive programmer who actually has been to Code Jam finals. He says ChatGPT wouldn't be able to solve the majority of tasks that are used in algorithmic competitions like Code Jam. ChatGPT might be able to do some of the simplest tasks, but Code Jam had a few rounds of increasing difficulty and at some point it wouldn't help much. The last round is actually in-person so there would be no influence of ChatGPT there at all (Edit: correction, the final round used to be in person, but it has moved online since Covid)

Also, even if people do use ChatGPT, that shouldn't be a problem - it's a tool like any other. Programmers use tools all the time. Is it cheating if someone uses Wolfram Alpha or Stack Overflow to solve a programming task at hand?
+1 i get so many obvious spam emails delivered to my gmail account yet they block / filter my emails any of the 3+ times i have tried to host my own email. The email monopoly/ centralization it out of control.
The device itself is a one time use device that has a this mechanical mechanism to inject a thin needle underneath your skin and lasts for a couple of weeks
Sure, but if it's a bad fit, it's still tied to you. Your team or some other team is now blaming you for their bad hire and you don't get the money.
Yes and they're amazing. Tremendous work by Megavolt85.
No. It's not "quite clear" that "quitting social media alone is probably even worse and self-isolating than not taking part."

It's clear from my experience as a parent, and from the experience of many others, that that isn't an issue. The child may whine and throw a tantrum, but that's not a reason to let the child be the parent.
Those agreements aren't permitted in many countries, where OP might be at.
Maybe "more or less" unseizable is the better concept.

Try to "seize" the belief in the death and resurrection of Christ from one billion believers (or even from one sufficiently devoted).

Even if the story isn't real, it has very real and tangible consequences.

A painting is seizable. But if it is simple enough, it can be recreated from memory. How could you seize it?

Ultimately it depends on what you care about. Often we care about seizable things. But not everything is seizable.
Is it almost as if nuanced topics require judgement instead of taking sides.
I feel similarly to seeing parenting advice from people who clearly aren't parents.
I agree, Reagan was nothing but an actor who depended on toxic masculinity and the ability to be a humorist. Carter was honest, where Reagan lied. Carter wanted to help people, where Reagan griped about welfare queens and put millions in prisons for non-violent crimes. Carter was highly educated, where Reagan had Nancy.
What does it say about us collectively that we've chosen a proprietary closed-source platform to develop the majority of the worlds Open Source Software?

It seems a bit strange, like going to use a gym inside a fast food restaurant, or perhaps seeking spiritual fulfillment through associating with a for-profit religion. Yes, these are both terrible analogies. I invite you to offer better.
Yes. How a modern could look like? From a UI/UX point of view?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gennady_Korotkevich
Every section ends with a summary of the research discussed, and the last section discards some alternative theories and ends with the thesis of the article.

Why can't people read the article in question? Is this not something we learn at uni, or even high school?
Cool, brightly colored shipping containers stacked on top of each other. /s
Thanks for the suggestions! They make sense, and you're right about the writing :)

I haven't tried a mentor or coach yet, but it does make sense
You were fine with racism but not sexism? That was the line.

Or was it somehow a joke or satire even though many of us have heard exactly that message in a serious context before?
It's a literature review, and no social science question is replicated 100% of the time. But here's the main question and answer:

> 5. Question 3A: Do Experiments Using Random Assignment Show a Causal Effect of Social Media Use on Mental Health?

> These experiments provide direct evidence that social media—particularly Instagram—is a cause, not just a correlate, of bad mental health, especially in teen girls and young women.

As for the thesis, it is succinctly described in the title:

> Social Media is a Major Cause of the Mental Illness Epidemic in Teen Girls.
Compare to China’s investment in undermining.

You can’t organize online or even move around in they city without The Party knowing about it and sending you to a disappearing camp.

Yesterday on Reddit someone showed how now the toilet paper in public restrooms requires you to have your face scanned to dispense!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=W58iM69waLo
I am a guy but I was in middle school when FB first became popular (around the time of the recession).

I was definetly quite lucky that my dad worked in the tech industry as well and was a bit of a luddite around social media (locked down accounts and parental controls) while also maintaining a non-social media related friend group (swim team, tennis, debate, hiking, boxing). By the time I was old enough to learn how to bypass these (around 12-13) I feel I was a bit more mature and able to handle the kinds of pressures on social media.

But then again, my parents were also pretty pro-active in my life, so maybe issues caused by social media are due to lack of parental involvement leading to parents using FB/YT/IG/TikTok as a substitute for parenting.
> We could lament them shutting it down, but why not thank them for doing this for 20 years?

We did? Everyone talking about how shitty and staid they've become is comparing to how great they were.
The wisdom for programming language adoption is that you need to be able to do nothing in 3 minutes (exitCode 0 = success), do anything in 10 minutes (pick a softball problem for your tutorials that avoids the difficult parts of your language), and do something in an hour.

With that in mind, you don't have to remove the model, you just need defaults that can get you past that 1 hour mark, and people will stick around long enough to put in the time and effort to figuring it out.

Most simple problems don't need shared state in order to work, so a language that makes assumptions, such as no sharing by default, could kick that can down the road for a bit. A lot of recursive and some iterative examples only ever accumulate state on the stack. You don't need shared state until you interact with an external system, such as another computer or a human.
I think ChatGPT limits you to a certain number of characters, so you often can't summarize a long article or a paper
Using all of these hiring tools is the issue.

They didn't work 20 years ago, still don't work, however interviewing someone like they're a person, asking questions, finding their passion, that has had 100% return for me and my companies.

Word of mouth has been the best way I've been able to hire a lot of really skilled people. My team members have told me many times that I'm the best manager they've ever had.

It's because I don't do anything the way you're supposed to.

Try being a place worth working for and you'll see skilled people show up, and they know how to get ahold of you since they're highly skilled and motivated.
This is phenomena is called monopsony and Apple has been doing this since forever (HDs, "retina" displays, glass, semis, etc). In Apple's case, they have essentially subsidize innovation and manufacturing capacity at the expense of temporary exclusivity and I believe that it's been beneficial for the market at large. It's like how guaranteed purchase contracts were instrumental in bringing COVID vaccine development forward.
Now that we know exactly how big it is, do we have a good understanding of how bad things would be if it did impact earth?

(I've watched too many sci-fi movies, I'm just really curious)
It's at least possible - drag nets can and do touch the bottom.
Disclaimer: Not a parent, did not grow up during the era of social media (and my own childhood experiences cannot be extrapolated!)

As a kid, I was bullied, outcast, left out. Oddly enough, I don't think I was depressed. Sure, I was sad sometimes. But given that my options didn't include doing things with kids from school, I did things on my own. Fortunately for me, I also had access to a (relatively) safe outdoors to explore. Or if the weather wasn't cooperating, I would play with toys inside.

But it sounds like social isolation can lead to mental illness/depression, so I don't know if enduring that is an acceptable alternative to the near certain mental illness that being part of the internet-connected social scene seems to cause.

Should we redirect our attention to figuring out how to keep kids mentally healthy despite likely social isolation that's going to happen no matter what? Is that possible?
React Is Holding Me Hostage
Technically it does give a specific answer to the question, but it is based on the semantically similar comments (and the question).

The thing people don't realize is that right now there is a very large gap between the capabilities of a few models including OpenAI's most recent ones, and most of the other LLMs. So there are several options for actually training or fine-tuning with open models, but actually none of them have the language understanding and generation capabilities at the level of those new OpenAI models.

As far as I know.
The Amish kinda slap, they didn't invent addictive social media, put a game show host in charge of nuclear weapons, or have a bunch of corporations change their icons to rainbow icons while still being shitty.

They literally realized 300 years ago that they should opt out of the nonsense America descended into
> If you rely on stable archives for security (ensuring you don’t accidentally trigger a tarbomb, for example), we recommend you switch to release assets instead of using source downloads.

Isn't that actually the only way you could get a zipbomb? git-archive will never generate a zipbomb...
We need models that can read long texts like a bunch of scientific papers, a book, or the whole git repo of an app. And we need models that can do iterative changes - diff models, they can be trained of course on git commits.
yeah +1 on this, seeing a lot of weird posts where people claim chatgpt screwed something up, and the prompt is all wrong or it is just a special case that will be solved eventually.

The citation thing is a good example of this, just because chatgpt makes up citations today doesn't mean that it will always make up citations, accurate citations is just the wrong use case today. Already there are extensions that make accurate citations work. Still, people point at inaccurate citations as some kind of proof that chatgpt won't work.

Probably people want it to fail or don't want to believe how transformative it is.
Interesting idea, but wouldn't it lead to groupthink and prevent outliers from pushing the envelope?
> That's a LONG time to do anything

I can't help but think that in a meeting somewhere someone mentioned that the coding competitions have run forever in response to people complaining how quickly everything dies -- and someone decided to fix the glitch.
Is there a backup for all the problems and solutions?
If one of ten employees isn't paying attention in a meeting, good chance it's the employee's fault. If most of the employees in a meeting aren't paying attention, it's probably the manager's/meeting-runner's fault. In between those, it might take some digging to figure out who needs to adjust to fix the problem.
line in resume?
site:news.ycombinator.com "in my experience"
120K results
While the generations are a bit dated - https://waitbutwhy.com/2013/09/why-generation-y-yuppies-are-...

> Social media creates a world for Lucy where A) what everyone else is doing is very out in the open, B) most people present an inflated version of their own existence, and C) the people who chime in the most about their careers are usually those whose careers (or relationships) are going the best, while struggling people tend not to broadcast their situation. This leaves Lucy feeling, incorrectly, like everyone else is doing really well, only adding to her misery:

> (image)

> So that’s why Lucy is unhappy, or at the least, feeling a bit frustrated and inadequate. In fact, she’s probably started off her career perfectly well, but to her, it feels very disappointing.

> ...

> Ignore everyone else. Other people’s grass seeming greener is no new concept, but in today’s image crafting world, other people’s grass looks like a glorious meadow. The truth is that everyone else is just as indecisive, self-doubting, and frustrated as you are, and if you just do your thing, you’ll never have any reason to envy others.

---

Thus, the "set reasonable expectations" along with "realize that what is on social media is a constructed reality reflecting the masks people wear in that environment." The "what people see on Facebook" is almost as scripted as any romcom movie - just that most people realize that the movie is a constructed fabrication yet tend to expect that they can live day to day the same as what people project into the constructed reality of social media.
In case someone else seeks performance benchmarks https://loxilb-io.github.io/loxilbdocs/perf/
Yeah. I won't refer people I don't really know and certainly not someone I do know and am not impressed by.
And what do you do when there's 10,000 exact keyword matches, how do you sort them? If it's newest the entire thing is just going to be spam accounts reposing the same video(s) on any major keyword.
"top", or anything notable is also likely to be gamed and abused too, especially if you fuzz "top" sorting because then its not really neutral, you're deciding the order and therefore making a recommendation.
Again... you can do the same thing with offshore bank accounts. If your plan is a novel way to hide money, that's been a solved problem for over a hundred years.

If you want to use your hidden money on a day-to-day basis, I think most nations are going to ban this practice simply because it's not a sustainable way to operate a state with a tax basis.
as Google retiring for on being Google

Can you learn to construct a grammatically sentence before you decide click the submit button?
It's python syntax highlighting for formatted string literals. PEP 498.

https://peps.python.org/pep-0498/
I wrote a blog about the general case https://nickp.svbtle.com/general-collectors-problem
> If Kurt is willing to (gracefully, as you said) crush someone's side project over a rude tweet

I didn't read this at all. I read it as "we will refund you", not "we will kick you off". I know that fly.io frequently refunds payments for customers, if they feel the bill was unexpectedly large.

> running the risk that if Kurt doesn't like one of your tweets, he (gracefully) will ask you to move to a new platform?

I read this as "if you don't like us, leave us", not "I want you to leave us because I didn't like what you said". The first one is a bit more fair, because it's just a statement that if you don't like the way we do things, there are alternative providers, though some may say it's not the most graceful way to talk to an annoyed customer (picture "apologies for the breaking change, we will try to warn/communicate/avoid such changes in the future"). The second one is far more brazen.
They wouldn't be out of the loop if enough other girls did the same thing. They you'd have your own group.
> For instance, before the election stuff is dismissed as “no injury” after the election it’s “no way to rectify”.

You have to be more specific here. The way you're describing it, sure, that may sound unfair.

But let's look at what was being claimed before the election. Then, lawsuits were about restricting which votes could be counted and when. The Trump campaign and Republicans were very concerned about drop box votes, which they felt could potentially be fraudulent. Mind you, they didn't bring evidence that the votes were fraudulent. There were just theories that they could be, and therefore should be summarily rejected. Cases like these were rightly dismissed, because they didn't state an actual injury, and they didn't even provide evidence of a potential injury. You can't sue for anything with no evidence and expect to win.

The net result of accepting the Trump campaign's claims at face value would be to disenfranchise voters without any evidence their votes should be discarded or made harder to cast. Weighing definitive disenfranchisement against potential and unspecified voter fraud leans in favor of the latter.

As for "no way to rectify" after the election, that's not quite true. There are processes within each state to challenge their individual elections after they are held. The Trump campaign went through that process and lost. One main reason they lost is they didn't allege any fraud in court. Think about that for a moment. The entire Trump campaign and the GOP apparatus was on TV, all day, every day from November to January claiming fraud.

But when standing in front of a judge, they demurred. Why? The obvious answer is because they didn't have proof of their claims. If they did, they would have provided it. But they didn't have proof, so they didn't make the claim in a court of law where it would have legal ramifications, unlike TV.

Moreover, when the relief they wanted was untenable. They wanted things like entire elections to be thrown out after they were certified. They wanted to rerun the entire presidential election at the national level. There's just not mechanism to effectuate what they wanted to happen, which is they wanted the courts to install Trump as POTUS over the will of the electorate. Indeed, there's no way to rectify their perceived injury, and telling them as such shouldn't cause a beef in anyone who has followed the state-level recounts and audits. Because the Trump campaign lied, and anyone who still is pushing the idea the 2020 election was stolen from Trump was lied to, or is still lying to this day.
We have an AI process trying to automate all matching and speed up the process, because we have a lot of candidates... The real problem I find is that the best candidates are not even looking for a new job or applying, so we are currently trying to offer part time opportunity for all open position to see if they are gong to like us...
If a person is in a $200m per year job, they're primarily incentivized to keep the job for as long as possible. This one objective dwarfs any other consideration in every decision that the person makes.

And sure, 99% of his compensation is Google stock, but at those magnitudes the marginal utility of the dollar is zero. What's the difference between $100m and $200m anyway?
5nm? It was also funded by AMD since it is their customer, and by many other customers.
this model breaks down because you have to enter society eventually. transitioning from homeschooling to highschool junior year and then into a large university was very difficult in my personal experience.
This assumes that they care about applying logic and consistency. There is little evidence that this is the case.
Butlerian Jihad gives me a spark of hope. ;) A global taboo against thinking machines is probably our best bet for freedom.
Wait. This was made over a decade ago? I thought all the posts were relevant today.
A trans flag with a euphoria boner on it would be more fitting. Maybe next to some crusty underwear that one of these pervs stole from his sister.
Sure, but that's a classic tragedy of the commons. I've been applying selectively to some places over time, and have had less than 10% even send me a rejection letter. As an applicant, if I actually needed a job, I can't afford to send out a handful of applications and wait 2-3 weeks to find out if I'm even being considered before sending out more.

EDIT: Now that I think about it, I've often had companies who did interview me take weeks to initiate the process from when I applied.
#3 doesn't seem to correlate well with being able to interview/meet with team members, unless hiring takes priority over emergencies, etc. Then again, with enough bodies that should be possible to do without much of a hit.
Search it is! I could implement search that searches for exact tokens in the tools the author connected and the README, but I want to wait for anything more until EdgeDB releases its full-text search solution https://github.com/edgedb/rfcs/blob/master/text/1015-full-te...

I actually had a feature in mind where people could vote on starters they want and others could build them out and list them for free or a price. Do you think that would fit your needs and is there anything in particular you'd want to see in a feature like that?
I'm amused at the juxtaposition of "you'll be family" with "no bullshit."
conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists existed long before social media did.
Re >> "Most of today’s Americans had not been born by the time Carter left office in 1981."

Oof, The use of the word "most", as opposed to simply "many" hit me harder than I expected! (I'm early 80s, but not 81'). I guess taking into account how demographics skew young, that's not surprising. But still, oof.

Edit: Also, the older I get, the more I admire, respect, and appreciate Carter.
>> From a fundamentals perspective, the expected number of meals is a function of the probability of finding the fourth toy in any specific meal.

> I can barely parse it. The probability of finding the nth toy before the nth meal is 0, so is the answer a function of 0?

The probability of finding the fourth toy in the first meal is 0%.

The probability of finding the fourth toy in the second meal is 0%.

The probability of finding the fourth toy in the third meal is 0%.

The probability of finding the fourth toy in the fourth meal is 9.4% or whatever.

The probability of finding the fourth toy in the fifth meal is 37.5% or whatever.

Etc.

The expected number of meals is 1 x 0% + 2 x 0% + 3 x 0% + 4 x 9.4% + 5 x 37.5% + 6 x ... + ...
Yep, price gouging is just regular market-based pricing but when it occurs during an emergency. Why some people think it mysteriously stops being a good system during times of emergencies is beyond me.