skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
he's not grifting for Dilbert product sales primarily, he's chasing the high of being a Political Thought Leader (to some) in 2016.
I'm not sure what the point is here. We all agree in the UK that we don't want guns to be legal, so they aren't. An American's view that we'd be better off if they were is neither here nor there.
Oh, there was an official statement?
More "entitlement culture" being glamourized by the New York Times.
The Secrets in Our Skies
"Mass shooting" (in the advocacy-numbers sense you're using it) is generally taken to mean three or more people hit by stuff that came out of a gun (framgents, ricochets count too). It is not "three people shot", much less "three people dead". When using this statistic, the average number of people killed is about one per "mass shooting".

What's more, most of these shootings are among people who are participating in organized crime in bad parts of cities. It's not random, innocent people getting shot. The random, innocent people getting shot ones are the ones that are profitable to put on news streams, though. They are exceedingly rare.

Using reasonable definitions of "mass shooting", the number so far in 2023 is 1-3.
The AT command set is very much alive and well. All those cellular chips in your smartphones and IoT devices still communicate with their host processors over a serial communication line, identical to the Hayes box back in 1978.

The commands have gotten more complicated, but as far as I know ATI will still give you a typical part identification code.
> This stuff “just worked” in the late 90’s

I see you have repressed the memories of editing modelines in xfree86.conf :P
transparent flamebait
Nah, there’s nothing less interesting and more irritating than bikeshedding of that sort. Nobody cares about some blowhard’s attempt to generate pointless “debate” over hypotheticals and semantics.
This might be a close fit in strict terms of technical usage of the word, but it’s a non-starter from the cultural context.

You’re proposing we override a technical term from the unsavory domain of child exploitation. Please, can we not?
> What’s the scandal here?

If they intended to do this why not advertise it, like you said reuse is a better outcome than recycling them. But it's much more likely they found the cheapest bidder to do what they asked and didn't verify anything, so what are their other cheapest bidders doing that isn't reuse/recycling? The scandal is that they're lying about what they're doing so why would we take their word about other things.
It's nice that this phone is "officially" repairable which means you can buy the parts straight from Nokia and do the repairs yourself but keep in mind that most popular Android phones (even the cheap Chinese ones) are already repairable, you can look up instructions on how to open the back panel on youtube and buy the parts off aliexpress and do the repair yourself, or with brands like Xiaomi which have large presences in some countries you can have them do it, for much cheaper than it would cost for this phone.
Haha alright buddy. You have a good one too. For future reference, opening responses to reasonable questions with "Don't pretend to be stupid" and "You're just being prideful" will probably yield a not-very-generous conversation in general.
I had a pre-alpha (beta?) Minecraft account that I had to give up on due to this.
Curious, what is the reason you would consider buying more than 1?
You can also easily run into that as a solo developer if you have a project with more than one target, e.g. an application with a few shared libraries (or e.g. Qt plugins).

> is slow to modify a qmake file with subdirs, or slow for qmake to evaluate it?

It's mostly slow because it generates a lot of make files which all have to be run to find out whether there is anything to do; you can e.g. try by generating the qmake project for LeanQt and open and run it in Qt Creator; then when everything is built make a change in one file and build; when you do the same with LeanCreator and BUSY you will notice that it's more than twenty times faster.
Every proponent of an opinion with a snappy slogan will gladly explain how their opinion is very nuanced. Take, for instance, “defund the police”. It can be explained as a reasonable nuanced opinion, and not the literal interpretation. The same can be applied to most every slogan.
When you say this do you mean "we have to look for the underlying causes of calorie imbalance" or do you mean "the human body is capable of materializing mass out of nothing"?

I can't imagine someone saying "the gravity theory of plane crashes is exploded" even though when we look at how to prevent plane crashes we look at other causes.
how would nationalizing the drug manufactures help in this particular situation? glp1 shortages.
Yes and I believe their videos are one the best things on the Internet right now as far as math education is concerned. Same goes for {Computer,Number}phile.

The reason they're high quality learning material is because the explanations of the various concepts respect weaker math backgrounds, without being desperate to be as reductive as possible or have clickbaity titles , and sometimes with downright wrong claims, to generate more audience.

An example of a channel that consistently follows this latter pattern is Veritasium i.e. see the electricity video controversy.
Can you elaborate how that could work in practice?
It's a nice dream. I would just caution that we will unlock people claiming that this works and foisting a half-baked version of it on large populations to save money, look modern, and make profits for tech companies... long before we unlock the actually good version.
An astronomer on Reddit* says:

> because the light we see is ~25k years old from the center of the galaxy, we are seeing it as it was 25k years ago. However, in astronomy we do not worry about this and instead just use the time at which the light reaches Earth- firstly there is just no way to know what is happening there literally now

so in their view, it seems assuming the event as present is the norm.

*: https://old.reddit.com/r/science/comments/11bk0u1/a_mysterio...
People very often do not hear what they do not want to
Same thing at my state uni. We used https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/unix-power-tools/059600... as our textbook, and I still keep it on my shelf 20 years later.
Is there an alternate link to the article? I cant seem to get the guardian to loaf and i want to see if they made the very basic mistake of missing that Australia is largely a resource producing country so inflation in resources prices would drive profits and inflation but would not mean inflation is driven by corporate profits.
To be fair: “..and genuine parts available for five years via..”

..but even so, it’s still a valid concern.
6. The network is secure.

— https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacies_of_distributed_compu...
> God hears everything

It is probably wrong to assume that God interfaces with the physical universe in the same way as us (and other living beings who perceive sound).

They (God) may perceive vibrations of air particles in a way that we wouldn’t call “sound”.

In fact, I’m pretty sure they have to otherwise they would be overwhelmed by all the noise they hear from everywhere all the time.
Thank you for this cool blog post!

> Each syntactic function (a lambda \x -> ...) gets a unique name
> Determine the stack size of its captures based on the largest captures of any lambda in the lambda set it's involved in.

If I understand these two points correctly, this would require a whole-program optimization and would mean that libraries need to be recompiled alongside the current program. For example, if there are libraries `foo` and `bar` to be used by a program `baz`, it seems that the names of functions in `foo`, `bar` and `baz` need to be distinct. But how do you ensure this if `foo` and `bar` are compiled separately? Similarly, I cannot compile `foo` without knowing about `baz`, because any higher-order function in `foo` needs to know what kind of lambda set it will have in `baz`. That would seem to imply a big increase in compile-times when working with a larger codebase.

I don't know if this is well-known, but one thing I find helpful during compilation is to have the procedure that compiles an expression take a parameter indicating where the expression should be compiled, rather than (in this case) always compiling to the stack and storing the result elsewhere later. This eliminates a lot of trivially-reducable load and stores.

This sounds a lot like Destination-Driven Code
Generation as used in V8. This is a fun presentation about it: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/eatonphil/one-pass-code-ge...
The buffer could have been freed but not zeroed out maybe.
work for people, not companies. avoid people who love meetings.
Disclosure: I work for FusionAuth, an Auth0 competitor.

Anecdotally, we've seen a number of folks choosing to migrate off of Auth0. Sometimes in a hurry, to avoid contracts renewing. The length and effort of the migration really depends on the particular applications, how they are using Auth0, and what features they need. Auth0, to their credit, still lets you export password hashes (unlike Cognito) so you can do a pretty transparent migration.

On the flip side, we've lost deals to Auth0 for valid reasons. So Auth0 can still be competitive. Have you talked to your Auth0 sales rep and indicated you are unhappy? They might be able to do something for you. (I understand that migrating just to end up in the same place, functionality wise, is frustrating.)

You mention being deeply integrated with Auth0. I'd love to learn more. It might take less time than you think, depending on the feature set of the alternative and how you integrated. The Authorization Code grant is pretty similar across providers, for example. And we have the concept of Lambdas, which is similar to Auth0 Actions.

Here's a migration guide I wrote: https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/migration-guide/auth0

It focuses on moving to FusionAuth, but the first half might be useful to you, as it is all about planning and getting data (esp password hashes) out of Auth0.

Finally, if you want to run your own auth server, FusionAuth has a community edition that you can download and run for free. https://fusionauth.io/download has more details, and I'd be happy to chat with anyone (my contact info is in my bio).
> the purpose was to show that companies like Dow can’t be taken at their word when it comes to environmental initiatives

Did we really need this example to show it? Shoes?

Nestle is trying to buy all the water, maybe that would be a better place to focus.
You forgot FCC and FCD.
In practice only NFC is used and sometimes NFD for speed
Objeck – A Programming Language
Would this count as fair use? https://www.spreadshirt.com.au/shop/design/funny+washing+ins...
> Regardless of a grid’s size, the current flowing through it oscillates in perfect synchrony, at exactly the same frequency, throughout the whole grid

I have a feeling that this is not exactly true. The grid is composed of transmission lines (in the “wires on pylons sense”), that are on one hand short enough that they do not really behave like transmission lines (in the circuit analysis sense), but on the other hand long enough that their propagation delay and other “RF-like” properties are somewhat interesting for design of efficient grid.

On the other hand, the phase shifts and related distortion effects are outside of the bandwidth of the audio recording as long as the grid is at least somewhat properly designed.
3rd party AV is useless in modern computing. Ublock origin and knowing your file extensions is a significantly better solution.
Thanks for the link, although I could only stomach a few minutes of purestrain midwittery pouring into my skull before I had to shut it off.

Certainly didn’t sound like anything I’d associate with the alt-right, just the standard boomercon “the Dems are the real racists amirite” useless reactionary claptrap.

People like Adams and Peterson need to stay in their narrow lanes of expertise and stop beclowning themselves. Stating “47% of blacks have issues with the phrase ‘it’s okay to be white’” isn’t racist, just unbearably stupid if you don’t follow up with an answer to “why is that?”

Which, of course, he didn’t. And canceling him for “racism” over that seems very unwise unless you want to further radicalize the poor sods that listen to him.

Edit: if replies downthread are accurate, he does go quite a bit further into the realm of actual racism. Essentially a sanitized rewording of “around blacks, never relax”.
"When you say this do you mean "we have to look for the underlying causes of calorie imbalance" or do you mean "the human body is capable of materializing mass out of nothing"?"

when you say this, you reveal your ignorance of the biology that makes it far more challenging for some people to "eat less" than others, and that changes their metabolism to combat the weight loss if they do happen to "eat less" for some time.
Seems to be not a far one because you know what I mean.
Definitely. I have not worked in frontend/ux stuff for over 10 years, and I am working on this by myself, so I have been focusing on the CLI to quickly iterate and prove that it works reasonably well. Part of the reason of trying it out on math was to a find a more technical group of users.

The ideal state is a graphic interface where the exercises are presented on the screen to reduce the friction. Gotta start somewhere.
I don't know what you are bitter over, but your word choice clearly reflects what I described.

>The fairest thing for everyone is equality. I'm signed up for that. I don't support equality and a little bit more.

I mean yeah, that's one way to characterize it. I don't think it's fair to characterize things as 'equality and more' and, to be honest, nothing you've said makes it seem like you are reasonably assessing any of this.

>If you want special treatment for your group, black, white or anything else, I won't support that, except potentially to further the goal of equality.

Not sure how you square this with the previous statement, but okay.
Mary Poppendieck (2009) Video
But my point is, why isn't the solution to create more jobs that aren't shoe-making so that they can contribute to the economy in a new way (idk, making yoyos) and now they have both yoyo's and free shoes?
In Europe you own a property inside a building and the condo is represented only by its own hoa that manages common spaces and handle simpler stuffs, nobody can force on you something more serious than cutting noises at 10 pm
To be clear, the Pixel 2 is unsecurable at reasonable performance against Spectre style attacks.

Might not matter to some.
If someone has literally never opened a terminal with a command line, you're probably being rather dismissive of how unintuitive it will be for a lot of people at first.
Thank you for your thoughtful and interesting comment.

I too like Java a lot and think it's a great technology.

I can see how a runtime for a compiler (such as the JVM) doesn't need to change much over time: if the compiler produces the right code in 2000, then the code is probably still right in 2020, it just could use more features of the ISA that were introduced since then.

On the other hand, the design of platform, library code and framework code is an ecosystem that is desperate to transform over time as better approaches to solving technical and business problems are found.
I just love the Delta's giant fireball at launch
Surprisingly, there are products in the grocers shelf in Canada that have insect extracts in them.

Our governments have failed us, and need to be disciplined.
I remember also when I was studying philosophy. The amount of non consensual traduction and interpretation from ancient greek is amazing. Ans what about the Επιούσιον case.

I agree with you : hungarian is maybe some contemporary equivalent of the great language from the past such as latin, greek or sanskrit, in regard of scientific thinking. Nevertheless, its a agglutinative language, and the logic behind is different.
The Black Sea Naval Control.

Putin offers something very attractive to the poor, shared oil wealth which is why he's been going after the oligarchs who took their wealth abroad. 2nd or 3rd largest global oil reserves can be found there. Saudi Arabia and the Middle East is too unstable and running dry.

The Anglo-Saxon model of wide wealth distribution will be used against the West.

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/why-the-b...
"just cheer up"

"just eat less"

it's that easy. the people who don't do it are just stupid or lazy (in the mind of the fat haters)
can someone flag this post for its stupid title? the object is not mysterious, they say what it probably is right at the start of the article. i see the mods change titles like this all the time. i dont think this should be an exception. this is really frustrating!
I never ordered Fairphone because honestly the camera is absolute crap and making pictures of my kids is maybe #1 thing I do with my phone.

If the camera on these is less crap… I probably still won’t buy it, because it has the same 3 years update policy as most Androids do.

But hey I might think about it harder.

edit: conversely, if fairphone ever ships with camera that’s better than 7 year old iPhone, then I’m game.
I’m curious what problems you’ve applied this to. Would love to chat if you are open. (My email is in my profile)
I mean, I have to figure out which peanut butter to buy from a shelf of 37 peanut butters. If anything, there's too much choice in a lot of cases. It's tiring.

I've heard way more Android users disparaging iPhones than vice versa. If anything, the fault of iPhone users is not even knowing or caring anything else exists.
A decent example from my own career (if we're going with the "debt as short-term gain, long-term loss" metaphor): I spent 3 years at a DoD consulting firm for my second job.

The pros:

- Boost in pay ($40k -> $85k a year)

- Boost in my credibility and resume (I had no STEM degree)

- More professional development resources (I was able to do a master's while working and got to witness a lot of engineering in-the-large)

The cons (at least in my mind, since I can't be sure what I would have done elsewhere):

- A lot of the stuff I did there is unmarketable. No one is writing new code in Perl. And static analysis, while technically very interesting, is not a ginormous market.

- I feel "behind" in the world of cloud computing since I didn't do much of it while I was there. Most of my next steps look like places that demand a lot of skill building big systems in the cloud. I'm doing it a lot right now but I feel like my team and I are learning a lot of lessons the hard way.

- If I had succeeded in moonshotting my way into a top tier tech company earlier, I would have earned enough capital to take advantage of a couple critical periods (cheaper housing, various opportunities in the stock market, etc)
Many Intel laptops beat the M2 in pure CPU performance for several hundred euros less, in some models for almost half the price. The i7 12650H drains your battery much faster (and hotter) but beats the M2 in most real world applications. You also get other benefits (like easily upgradeable and cheaper RAM) for heavy workloads that make the price difference even greater.

Sadly, AMD has fallen behind Intel again, but their chips often pose just as good a performance-per-euro advantage.
Ask HN: 2023 Year of Linux on Phones?
Now that we're done with the year of linux on servers, desktop and laptops, is it (should be) about time it really comes to our phones?

Postmarketos, pine64 are great examples of projects driving the community (and tech) forward.

What do you think?

In my opinion it feels it needs some money to be poured in, maybe a "big player" coming in with a "phone we can fix", and hack.
You really like using words such as "every" where they have no reason to be used. Why are you making these kind of in-equivocal statements when they are clearly baseless and are just an expression of your political feeling. Good, express your political feelings. Telling people how everyone in a group of people does xyz is the exact problem you are complaining about.
I personally think airline tickets need to be taxed heavily so that travelers pay for every ounce of carbon emitted to be captured.
This is the same reason why we see hot-takes like "Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner." From a historical, obvious it-happened naive point of view, yes absolutely it's 100% true.

But the point of invoking that hot-take is to justify tearing down statues of Jefferson, and disrespecting Jefferson is itself is a symbolic act of attacking the validity of the founding principles of the USA. Also, it's intentionally meant to undermine people who have respect for Jefferson.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/11/business/coronavirus-dest...

Yeah, that's what we do when we have too much supply

Also, that's not the Feds job.
Also, you might want to change the title to make this an 'Ask HN'.
Unfortunately, it seems to be having the opposite effect on Adams.
When was this ever a nuanced position? It’s not like there’s any sizable group of people questioning whether it’s okay to be white — the focus for centuries has been on gaining access to the lifestyle and respect white people have, and dealing with the aftermath of discrimination. Statistically nobody is asking for new discrimination, just an end to the old system.

This is not an uncommon tactic, I’ve noticed. For example, fundamentalist Christians often like to pretend they’re oppressed because it’s an effective recruiting and retention strategy even though it makes no literal sense when you look around the country and see how much power they have. Any time I see someone in a dominant group painting themselves as a victim, I know to ask what bill of goods they’re trying to sell me.
Have you tried Firefox's reader view? I find it very helpful for annoying site designs, especially after adjusting its style settings.
This is the kind of stuff that makes the internet fun. I really like the types of projects that exist simply to exist. People putting out things that have no reason except for the enjoyment.

It seems like we're missing this kind of stuff lately. Even the April 1st hacks have failed to be interesting on the same level. I wonder what has happened and why.
Nokia nowadays has nothing to do with the original company. The name was moved around, first to Microsoft, now it’s some Chinese company I think?
BMR varies hugely by person, its not even a minor difference for some.

Yes, calorie imbalance is a thing, but you can be a 300 lb person who eats 2750 calories a day, also be a 200 lb person who eats 2750 calories a day, with each performing a similar amount of exercise.

While calories in/calories out will help anyone lose weight, for some, even with the advantage of math - its still much harder, sometimes an order of magnitude harder.

I've done this before, and I lose around 100 lbs, and I've kept off about 60 of it - but for the entire two years, I had a gnawing, burning pit of hunger whenever I was away. It never stops, and I never stopped being hungry. I just did my best to ignore it.

On top of that, look how many social occasions revolve around food, to stick to any essentially effective diet requires refraining in those situations. That's even harder. "oh, everyone is going for fast food after the thing, I guess I can just have some water? okay, I guess that's okay" because one fast food meal exceeds your calorie goal for the entire day.

Now you tell me, how easy is it to eat less if you never felt satiated, never stopped being hungry?

My point here, is while calorie counting and exercise works, there is clearly more going on than just that.
ClamAV passes its versioning via DNS. No need to open outbound HTTP.
You might be interested in reading https://benedikt-bitterli.me/tantalum/