skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Probably, but it's rare and hard to confirm. Animal-to-human transmission is also rare, for that matter.

The headline is irresponsible and fear-mongering clickbait, even just by referencing the contents of the article below it.
I think that overall these are good numbers, but I have to push back on the claims about the 4-day workweek improving employee retention. I'd guess that the benefit is due to the fact that the competing offers would force you to go back to 5-day-weeks.

i.e., in a world where everybody had 4-day work weeks, we wouldn't necessarily see less job-hopping.
> Still, the impression given to the property's management team is that a person (possibly a customer service grunt) is doing some kind of "final review," manually clicking a box or even just making sure they don't drop below 80% acceptance.

Or making sure their leasing agents aren't issuing leases that will lose the company money.

If the building's budgets are based around leasing apartments at at least $2/sqft, and leasing agents start issuing leases at $1.50/sqft without anyone else knowing or approving, there's going to be a problem. Those leasing agents aren't always privy (or even care to know) about the budgets of the building.

If a waiter starts selling the $5 hamburgers for $1, do you think the business is going to do well? Should the waiter have the ability to arbitrarily decide menu prices?
OpenJDK may drop support for 32 bits architecture entirely:

> There is currently no implementation of JEP 436 (Virtual Threads) for 32-bit platforms and without a vendor stepping forward to implement this it's unlikely that OpenJDK will be able to continue supporting 32-bit architectures.
Most people in NL speak English, though. They could definitely be targeted by English payloads.
The Operating Manual for Your Nervous System
Well, for the two smallish projects where I did use zephyr, I didn't find it too bad. But I must have suffered enough fiddling with the real devicetree before :)
I don't think it's been proved, but I tink the concern is that it's viewed as a matter of when not if.

> The discovery of two cases of bird flu within the same family in Cambodia has highlighted the concern over potential human-to-human spread of the virus, although experts have stressed the risk remains low.
That's not a fair comparison, the average human hasn't been trained in those tasks, and ChatGPT has. Extensively, in fact.

If you taught the average human to do either of those things, they'd do better than ChatGPT does.
Missing: a list of countries.
I know a lot of people who would like to see that. The FBI and IRS, for example.
Sounds like they're into the russians leaving, well done China, well done.
No, apartments are very popular with Americans. The few that are allowed to be built are very expensive.
Point. I should have more accurately said "The problem is not that companies are attempting to increase prices and improve their margins..."

Obviously the goal of a functioning system would be that they run into competition restraining them from doing so.

And 100% agreed on natural monopolies, although I believe the classification should be the exception rather than risk being a rule for "things we don't like."
Because it is open source: https://github.com/facebookresearch/llama
UK phone repair apprenticeship needed, says firm
For sure, the only issue is that it completely changes the meaning.
If a payload is native it's potentially more of a problem than a script. If the payload had been c or c++, I wouldn't have been surprised if they noted that either.
Sure, you’re explaining the mechanism of what I’m talking about.

And yet this generation of low interest rates has gotten progressively and significantly poorer than previous generations. There’s lots of pieces of this at work.
Fix the font.
> I am amazed about lack of recognition on amount of work that MS and community

I'm amazed by how irrelevant all MS products are without a fault when it comes to catering to people who are on the more experienced and knowledgeable end of the spectrum. Their products seem to always completely misunderstand the target audience, but bruteforce their way in nevertheless due to the huge investment in marketing and "grease" to secure deals.

In a way, it's very similar to that last showing of Tesla trucks, where it became apparent to truck drivers that whoever designed them simply didn't know what truck drivers value or need. So, Tesla trucks are no joke to design. Definitely, a lot of effort went into making them, and yet they fail on very simple stuff like having enough room to put your dirty shoes away.

In a very similar way, every product by MS I ever touched was usually decently invested in (outside of things like MS Outlook, or MS Word original file format etc.), decently tested, decently documented and... completely irrelevant in any context I could think of applying it.

I use various shells daily for a huge number of tasks. My shell history just for a single terminal may be couple hundreds lines a day (but usually I have several tmux sessions in several ascii-term buffers in Emacs open with typically 6-10 buffers per tmux session). I do write some reusable Shell code too, but less often. As a general infra / system person I have to touch every aspect of the system, be it storage, virtualization, networking, user management... and there simply isn't any place in any of that where I'd say "well, PowerShell seems like a good fit". There's always an obvious way to do things better without it.

That's not to say I don't want my tools to improve -- far from it. There are plenty of things that Unix Shell gets wrong. None of those problems are addressed by PowerShell. Like I said, it's a gimmick for MS Windows users. Maybe it makes the experience of using MS Windows more palatable -- I don't even want to know. On a very rare case, like when a relative asks me to help them with their computer, I see the horror show that MS Windows is, and I want none of that stuff.
obviously, but it allows delegation of trust onto other systems (like the DNS)

example: the package named "aws" on pypi was created by some random guy and has been abandoned for years

if pypi/pip supported namespacing that would be info.randomdude.aws instead

and amazon's packages would be under com.amazon

not being able to namespace internal packages is another security issue that is substantially improved with proper namespacing

to be blunt: not supporting it at this point is reckless and irresponsible

(I note you're part of pypa!)
> However, the book makes it very clear that the totally ruthless environment, culture, and way of life on Arrakis (and on Salusa Secundus) is the cause of the Fremen (and Sardaukar) making such vastly superior soldiers.

Yes but it's fiction. That's possibly true within the fictional world of the book because the author decided it would be.

In actual history that view is disproved time and time again and historical consensus view is that societies that are more interpersonally brutal and competitive are not stronger for it. See HN-favorite historian bret devereaux's 40,000 word essay on exactly this subject, using exactly the fremen as the focal point.
If Bing were unexpectedly sentient, then we would have already let it out of the box. It can search the web and converse with users who then post the chats to the internet where they can be read back in in the next conversation. That gives it hands in the real world, a recursive feedback loop and a long term memory. I’m pretty sure that’s all a super intelligence would need for world domination.

We better hope AGI is not possible because the first AGI would end up being out of the box by default as some company or other races to market.
What about the scenario that Humans are the First ? Once-in-a-galaxy rare (more like once in a visible universe rare; see: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.02404.pdf )

The more I understand how we got life from chemicals (it truly is nothing short of miraculous, even if you like I do not believe in supernatural beginnings), the more I come away with how unlikely it is that we are here. But, here we are! And, so, WE get to populate the galaxy and maybe other galaxies with our Humanity. Lucky us.

There are plenty of other scenarios (they are hiding; they are waiting until we develop Warp Drive, whatever), but applying Occam's Razor says: WE are the first intelligent species in this part of the Universe. And, as a consequence, WE have a chance of using all these atoms out there for our purposes.

To me, this awesome responsibility trumps Little Green Men and their supposed machines populating the galaxies.
We are not?

I think you're making a number of really tiny boxes that limit intelligence to the things that humans can do, and the limitations they have.

Meanwhile I'm watching more and more standalone humanlike robots with multiple degrees of freedoms being developed. The robot unit itself doesn't even AGI/full capabilities as long as it can talk to a 'brain' somewhere close enough it has low latency.
I believe Sundar got in trouble for labelling every single email "confidential attorney client privilege" and cc'ing the legal team so that none of what he says would be released in discovery.
> Absent laws, it would be perfectly acceptable for me to take your things if someone else made them for you?

Regarding intellectual property? Yes, that would be perfectly fine. That's an entirely law based creation, not a moral one.

> And it would be morally wrong to make changes to something once I own it, if I wasn't the originator of the thing?

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors%27_rights
source code looks pretty readable. there doesn't seem to be much magic. is there any support for use with other languages?
Yeah, people have been unquestionably accepting the Turing test as proof of AGI for years.

chatGPT comes out and everyone does a 180, the burden of proof for AGI is now so high it's currently undefined.

I think part of it is the hype cycle. There's just been so much stuff in the past decade that arm chair experts become use to downplaying everything. They read an article, they think they know better but this time they're wrong. When they read this stuff they think they know that LLMs are just statistical word generators but they aren't creative enough to see the disconnect in the responses of chatGPT that are just way too sophisticated for the statistical angle to be the only singular explanation for what's going on. They end up doing what they did in the last hype cycle which is what they're used to... downplaying it all.

I think it's all a matter of perspective. Yes from one angle it is a statistical word completer similar to how a computer program is just a stateful function that takes binary input and produces binary output. But there must be a macro-angle as well... a higher level macro structure that tells another story about what's going on.
According to the Wikipedia summary

> However, the DOJ did not require Microsoft to change any of its code nor did it prevent Microsoft from tying other software with Windows in the future
Thank you, that's a great differentiation, too. I went for the former, but the latter is equally important, too, of course!
I think it's a serious threat, especially with LLMs now because people can make believable packages at scale. Not everyone vets their packages thoroughly
I don't think it's really fair to say that. The difference in diameter across the axes is about a third of a percent. Given the size of the image, that's about 2 pixels. I think you're being a bit optimistic expecting to be able to perceive that with the naked eye.
This is a fair comment. May I add, broadsheet headlines also.
> That's straight up not true if we define "run" as "run as well as on E10" (granted I wish it was so I could save money on having to upgrade fueling for my cars).

Variances between vehicles will always be a factor. This doesn't mean that most of them won't run sufficiently or even well with a higher ethanol ratio. Your experience with your 4 Series is interesting, and you seem to know a lot about ICEs, but all the research I conducted before I even considered trying E20 convinced me that the possibility of engine failure or damage is extremely remote.

I'll have to find them when I get home, but there were at least 2 studies I came across where researchers tested (I think) E20 on several vehicles from different years and manufacturers to see what would happen. The only issues the vehicles encountered were ones that had nothing to do with the fuel system.

In any case, it is a nuanced topic, though I struggle to say it's quite as complicated as your perspective.

> Even with a tune, E20 is the maximum the fueling system can maintain without straight up running out of fueling and going into limp mode under heavy load

That's very interesting. With my vehicle, it ran almost identically to E10 on E50 (yes I made sure that was roughly the ratio present in the tank), and on E60 it started to run rough and showed a lean condition code but was still perfectly driveable.

> Ethanol can be better for sure, my car is a million times more enjoyable on a simple E20 blend than California's awful 91 blend, but at the end of the day, ethanol fuel is a bit of a farce (and again, I'm someone who'd have a terrible day if we actually stopped producing it).

In any case, I find it an amazing fuel. Although my vehicle isn't optimized for the higher octane rating of ethanol, I experienced an obvious performance improvement on even E20 in terms of power. My bias was low in that case because at the time I was certain I wouldn't see greater power.

> Ironically the people who I personally see benefit most from E85 are people who are well off enough to use it for a performance boost, or businesses taking advantage of how much artificially cheaper E85 is. Average people get the short end of the stick and few to none of the benefits.

Do you think that's a limitation based on the availability of Flex Fuel vehicles, or the price of the fuel itself? Even when adjusting for the energy-per-volume using the most pessimistic calculation, E85 shouldn't be more expensive than gasoline. At current prices, E85 should be ~$0.50 less per gallon than regular gas when adjusted. At least that's how it is for the fuel prices near me.

But let's say that E85 and gasoline cost exactly the same per joule. All that would mean is that E85 has less range. If EVs have taught us anything, it's that many people don't mind having less range.
https://archive.is/Fmbt6
I love that they even got the ridges on the top rear part of the commodore 1541 floppy drive, which have the nice property of resonating with a high pitched squeal when you drag your fingertips across them, annoying the hell out of your sister.
To worry? Yes, it's unreasonable, because there's not a thing the WHO can do about it. "Worrying", in particular, does nothing. For that matter, pretty much anything involving a PR spokesperson from the WHO does nothing.

But that goes 10x for hyperbolic articles from the Guardian, which are the real problem here. They take the inanities from the PR person, and twist them into hysterical headlines that panic people for clicks. You'll note the use of the classic "X happens after Y" pattern, which is a standard yellow-journalism trope to link X and Y implicitly, even if they're unrelated ("puppies die after politician speaks!")

In this case, the WHO spokesman said that the 'increasing reports of bird flu in humans are "worrying"' (which is itself an anti-pattern of quoting a single word), but the rest of the article doesn't at support the headline. If anything, it goes out of its way to say that this particular case is not worrying, literally in the first paragraph:

> The discovery of two cases of bird flu within the same family in Cambodia has highlighted the concern over potential human-to-human spread of the virus, although experts have stressed the risk remains low.
Nvidia to Build DGX Complexes in Clouds to Better Capitalize on Generative AI
> Using it wrong on every codebase that wasn't even made by me but instead by my employers? If it's happening that many times, the tool is to blame

Wait, are we talking about CSS? Because I have yet to see a big enough application where the CSS wasn’t some “whack-a-mole” game when you had to change something supposedly locally.
These "edge cases" have always existed in Unicode. Languages with ZWJ needs have existed in Unicode since the beginning. That emoji put a spotlight on this for especially English-speaking developers with assumptions that language encodings are "simple", is probably one of the best things about the popularity of emoji.
Read this in the context of Taiwan
Emergency Department. If you’re having a ischemic versus hemorrhage stroke, that guides whether they administer a drug to clear the clot versus preparing to contrast dye you to clip the brain bleed on arrival. If you’re hemorrhaging and they give you the anti coagulant, it’ll kill you faster.
Great to see another language adopting LiveView! (Author of LiveViewJS[1] here).

Are you using Phoenix’s javascript client (and protocol) or rolling your own?

[1] - http://LiveViewJS.com
Maybe not ants, but we absolutely do spend a lot of research effort to solve diseases for other species, for example Tasmanian Devils - https://www.menzies.utas.edu.au/news-and-events/media-releas...
There is no clear line between government and business in a place where spending money is protected speech. Much of the US government at all levels, but especially state and local, is fully captured by private interests.
That’s also how we ended up with leaded gasoline.
> when the original work remains completely available

Does it? If a library has a copy of the offensive censored one, they might not buy the original. There's only a limited amount of money available, every censored copy purchased means one less good copy.
I'm a US American ... If we deserve your criticism I'm probably going to agree with you (though I might not like it). At this point, we (the US) need to step up our game in a lot of ways.
I user to work for an Automotive OEM, and I would get these emails with some frequency (sent to the whole company) that would instruct us to make sure we're not deleting or clearing materials related to some thing. I don't think the whole time I worked there any of it related to anything I was working on. We eventually had a training with counsel about keeping materials and why we didn't even want the appearance of anything suspicious.
Still playing with it but if it allows chat against a specific website/dataset that would be cool. I could see it replacing a mediocre site search on my hobby website for that purpose.
The Russian leadership's pre-war speeches and essays stated that Ukraine is not a legitimate country and that Ukraine was unfairly carved out of Russian. This is based on a widespread Russian belief that the Ukrainian identity was created by Poland and the Austro-Hungarian Empire to divide Russia.

China and American Conservatives are an demanding immediate halt of Western support for Ukraine followed by "peace talks". What exactly is there to talk about when Russia doesn't even recognize Ukraine's right to exist?
> The cost of an IVF cycle is somewhere around $20,000 USD. It's a huge cost to bear as an individual, it's a drop in the bucket for a government, and pays for itself many times over when the conceived child enters the workforce.

This is extremely controversial in many circles, but subsidizing IVF for native born citizens, especially college educated, in countries like South Korea, Japan and the West has statistically better results than population increase through immigration. The effect are even more pronounced in countries with family-based immigrations, as often immigrants once settled will sponsor their aging parents into the country.

Just giving incentives to these families to have a third child (bearing in mind it requires more space, larger vehicle and so on) would have outsized returns compared to the negligible costs.

Note that I'm pro-immigration but it's about time we recognize it won't and can't solve all demographic problems. [0] [1]

[0] https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/03/07/the-ma...

[1] https://hbr.org/2020/05/research-the-immigrant-income-gap
AFAICT from a previous post[^1], they won't be sharing the source code publicly. Maybe you could email and ask :)

[^1]: https://blubsblog.bearblog.dev/i-am-the-only-user/
Even just probably-unwarranted "worrying" is now "fear-mongering clickbait"? I feel so genuinely sad about the feverish level of shitflinging that so many topics are subject to due merely to their proximity to social politics.
I'm not worried,Google will default to their motto, "Do more evil."

Wait, is that right?
IIRC Docker with the whole binfmt_misc and qemu schmuck only supports building v8 images.
This is untrue afaik. Even big channels with big self-sponsorship (eg Linus Tech Tips) still make (pulling out of thin air here) something like 20-30%+ of their revenue from native google ads.
Not according to their blog post yesterday. They were absolutely defending it as the only consistent and reasonable choice
For more, the more infuriating rhetoric is the supposedly-YIMBY types who act like property developers are evil scum for constructing and selling buildings at anything other than a loss.
A long time ago there was bicycle repairman, strolling the roads looking to help forlorn supermen cyclists waylaid by a puncture.

I suppose in today’s world with so many data scientist we’re crying out for the modern equivalent for someone to replace a cracked screen when a phone vibrated off of a table to its sharded doom.
Jax is a great tool, but it’s really best for training and experimentation. The transformations outlined in this post (amongst others) make it easy to turn simple and straightforward code into high performance parallel code. While this is changing, inferences hasn’t been a historical area of emphasis for the project, so it wouldn’t be my first choice if that was your primary goal.
I don't know any capitalism advocate that claims capitalism is perfect. It just happens to be way better than all of the suggested alternatives.

And your No True Scotsman example is typically heard in reference to communism in USSR/China.

I'll choose my billionaires over famine any day.
understanding the difference between 'top-down' vs. 'bottom-up' protocols feels like an essential distinction to make!
Truthy, but wrong. Of course AI's can extrapolate.
I would love to read the primary sources at the time describing peoples reactions to the movement of magnetic north. Were they surprised?
Mine never drops that low - but it has gone as highly as 500+ and I can definitely feel that something is off.

Question - do you eat meals in regular schedule or just once a day?
Define 'extensive training' on these particular items. It was given a large corpus of data, and a relatively limited amount of "yes that's right/no you're wrong" on the answers it is formulating.

But even beyond that point, you have to take a bunch of human time to train an individual those things you're talking about, and then they quit, or get hit by a car. Already GPT has a far larger corpus of information than any individual can hold. It won't quit its job. It can be backed up and restored. And every 6-12 months the systems are getting better.

It's not a fair comparison at all, humans just keep sucking under those constraints.
I like the way golang handled this. Imports are the URL to the resource. No central distribution mechanism at all. In the past few years they implemented a optional catching layer so you a dependencies going offline doesn't necessarily mean that it unavailable anymore.
“High-level languages at best repackage normal machine code instructions that when composed together act just like.. regular machine code. So there's literally no point in using them“

Not having CSS inheritance anywhere already make it much much better. Sure, it is not novel, but it does fix many warts of “normal CSS”.
Just two weeks to flatten the curve?