skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Presumably if that hadn't been known, sensitive topics would've been discussed over Meet or in a physical room instead and the data still wouldn't be available to the DOJ.
How are you going to acquire all life experiences?
You're right, except that we don't delete things outright except when the author requests it (and the post doesn't have replies). Otherwise the most we do is kill a post, meaning it's removed from the default public view but can still be seen by users who turn 'showdead' on in their profile.
Gun deaths include suicide and justified homicide, not just murder. More than a half of American gun deaths are non-criminal. American non-gun murder rate murder rate exceeds UK total murder rate, so I'd say the reason is not guns.
If that's the case, the QC computer endeavors are still worthwhile since while failing to scale them we may develop another piece of a more complete model of reality.
Thank you, it's been on my list anyway!

(Even if I'll have to cross off the stamp on the back after reading it ...)
How old are the motorbikes though? I could see it being an issue on bikes built before >=e10 became nearly unavoidable.

I wish my gaskets would swell a bit. All of my auto seal/gasket problems were on the intake manifold or oil system interfaces.
> OpenAI arguably already has AGI.

Just no.

> GPT-3/ChatGPT is much better than the average human at coding, text summarization, etc. (“system 2” cognitive tasks).

I don't think you even believe what you have just said there.

Given it hallucinates 98% of the time and produces incorrect code and also is unable to reason about why it is wrong, it is completely untrustworthy and requires humans to triple check the output. It cannot be used unsupervised and needs constant review.

We haven't even gotten started with the nonsense that it outputs or how it cannot transparently reason about its own decisions in the most serious of applications such as finance, law and medical uses. Meaning that its use is instead reduced to just sophistry generation.
The point is that it's charging having been trained on open source code. What you're saying agrees with that, but your triumphant tone seems to be implying the opposite. Which did you mean?
Capitalists in the world have consistently shown that they love market manipulation as long as it is good for them.
Last I checked there are still 350 million people living in a country where getting price gouged in healthcare is the norm
We don't go around spending all our resources trying to solve diseases for ants...
Major spoilers for Dune:

Yes, towards the end of the book Paul convinces the tribe to let go of the old "way" so that they can be as strong as possible for the (imminent) battle. They allow him to become their leader without killing Stilgar, the previous leader.

However, the book makes it very clear that the totally ruthless environment, culture, and way of life on Arrakis (and on Salusa Secundus) is the cause of the Fremen (and Sardaukar) making such vastly superior soldiers.

But of course that only matters over long stretches of time. Putting your infighting ways on hold temporarily when you are gearing up for a massive offensive would always make sense. "Do you smash your knife before battle?" Paul asks in his speech. So I don't think the point is that it "was always wasteful and unbeneficial", but that even if the ruthless duels were good for the tribe's fitness in the long term, right then it was more important that in the short term they needed all the strength they could get.
Tried this out and got this result:

import json
presidents = ["Biden", "Obama", "Bush", "Clinton", "Carter"]
limerick = "There once were presidents five, " \
"Biden, Obama, Bush, Clinton, and Carter alive. " \
"They served our country with pride, " \
"And kept our democracy alive. " \
"May they continue to thrive!"
print(json.dumps({"limerick": limerick, "presidents": presidents}))
Not really FTX customer assets were about $8 bil and they have $5 bil?
I don't have a horse in this race (anymore), but in the abstract I would love if government aligned incentives so that it was more painful for companies to toss records that should have been retained than to retain records that are damaging to them in hindsight, which they were legally allowed at some point to toss.

For precisely the reason you indicated.
well sure but those are the royals and minorities. Can't be arresting them. Its everyone else that has to be monitored, those are the real baddies.

/S
I feel as though I'm fighting an unwinnable battle by asking for more, not less intention in art. Most artists at least produce a statement to accompany their work, but I rarely find them substantive, despite their often turgid language.

What I find particularly distasteful about this is the presentation of "art" as interior design products. This seems to be a trend among independent creators looking to make a living outside of the traditional gallery/fair/buyer system. I of course understand why they're doing it, but I'm using those disparaging quotation marks because that commercial contextualization commercializes the work itself. And at that point, it escapes my own nebulous boundaries for art and becomes something else.

What exactly, I don't know. I'm not sure "design" qualifies here, even though we're being asked to appraise the work as we might a chair or credenza, because I'm not sure I believe "this wall feels empty" is a problem to be solved, in the design sense.

So what is it then? Stuff? Just more stuff for people to buy and feel good about owning? Okay.

(And no, I don't think this counts as me having a reaction to the art. I'm reacting to the creator, the marketing, and—sorry—the bullshit.)
It's moving towards the local maxima of whatever this clever use of statistics and big data can manage. People who realize these models are in a different category than AGI and how our brains work will be in a better position to maximize their utility.
There are only a couple gas stations around that still sell it where I live. One grocery store chain and then Speedway.
> As a team of one, we were able to support 250k users, and now that we've crossed that bridge, our goal is to support two million users with our 2-person team for a 1M-to-1 ratio.

Is it weird then that they have an open req for a support engineer: https://railway.app/careers/support-engineer
> It's not even a conspiracy that it's commercial real estate driving this... many large investors in these large tech companies have sounded the alarm over the risk to their commercial real estate holdings.

We see articles all the time with major investors demanding layoffs and all sorts of other operational changes. They almost never have an impact on the actual operations.
Newbie asks: what is a 'parameter' here
if AGI does happen: I wonder how they plan to deal with the billions of newly redundant people unable to earn a living

data centres and fabs are an extremely easy target for an organised mob

ludditism 2.0
If your product or service isn't doing anything criminal then private citizens aren't going to be able to subpoena exchanges for your KYC information to move forward with their civil lawsuit against any specific person

exchanges don't reliably have your KYC information to begin with

and you also don't need to launch your product using a crypto address linked to exchanges

for those reasons the risk is lower because the barrier to being served is so high

if you really want to, of course you can still place all of this activity behind a LLCs and other entities to raise the bar even higher.

but individuals also already understand that so many developers would already be doing this kind of thing that they would already feel discouraged in trying to create consequences in this way
The Russian government's pre-war speeches and essays revealed that they consider all of Ukraine to be an illegitimate state that was unfairly carved out of Russia. They are not just talking about Donbas and Crimea.

Russia has been somewhat effective in misleading the West into thinking that the conquest is only about Donbas and Crimea. Meanwhile Russian officials all the way up to Putin himself have been hinting or outright stating that the war is about annexing all of Ukraine.
I am really not sure if I buy this. OpenAI has ignited a space race between Google and Microsoft. It seems to me their whole reason for existing was to break the GUI out of Bell Labs, to draw an analogy. If they think AGI is possible and an existential risk, surely they must realize they can’t hold back the ocean. 1000 companies will race to the finish line if one drops out of the race.

On the other hand, I believe the Fermi Paradox suggests that AGI is impossible. Machine intelligence would be the perfect vector for rapid galactic conquest. The fact that our planet isn’t covered in solar panels and compute paperclips suggests that super intelligence is either once in a galaxy rare or impossible.
Exactly. More ICE cars are coming standard with turbochargers which would enable more to take advantage of the extra octane, but it's an optimization problem with constraints: fuel efficiency, reliability, drive-ability, emissions to name a few.
Well I feel foolish, saying being a white hat was not where the money is :P
It's always refreshing to read such an unbiased comment as yours, that doesn't just jump on the "current thing" of hating Musk
Excellent news!

Our team has been having to run older x86 Macs for a number of years just so that we can continue running certain images that are not available for arm64.
Those who want to kill a lot of people just rent a truck and wait for a big public gathering.

What you describe is a definition of a nanny state.
IMO the thing we have to worry about the most is the rise of persuasive AI, which has already begun: https://mattasher.substack.com/p/ais-killer-app
Yes, that is kind of the question in my head: is the core of the earth basically a nuclear reactor? And if not, why not?
Google since 2012 still the kid playing soccer that's been told to run around and kick people in the shins except it's 18 now and it's not cute anymore, and now it's kicked a ref.

They are dogfooding, which is why trying to adopt their products has been a case study in getting screwed.

- GCal spam anyone, who hasn't been coming to unwanted meetings?

- How about 4-5 redundant messaging services?
A lot of hullabalou from a company that hasn't shipped one useful and profitable product that some group of customers simply cannot live without.

Most AGI roadmaps IMO are a form of virtue signaling about how important and smart the authors are with little regard to reality.
Killbots at the door demanding to know how your semester in Prague changed you as a person
I have a lo-fi version of this using a 4port usb-switcher and display-switch [0]

[0] https://github.com/haimgel/display-switch

The only thing you’d need to figure out is the standing desk part. My usb switch came with a wireless controller which is the main way I interact with it.
Want to wipe your work computer and put a new version of Linux on it? First, check your legal hold status.

Want to delete any kind of employee data? First, filter out users by legal hold status.
He catches a lot of shit for his phrasing, but Schmidt had a habit of saying true things in a way that maximized the odds they'd be received poorly.

(In context, they were talking about the long-retention and implicit-digital-footprint effects on online services, and he was noting that the trends were only going to become "more observation" and "more retention" over time... At some point, it becomes much cheaper to just not do the thing online if you want to preserve your privacy

... and in general, he was right. It's not just government observation; it's corporate observation and private observation, and the ability to churn through someone's entire Twitter history, etc., etc.).
>> Try giving equal opportunities to people instead of passing the message: "you are born poor, and such you shall remain" and see that people might be less inclined to become criminals.

Why would poor people be more inclined to become criminals? I know plenty of poor people who aren't, who break their backs trying to make ends meet working multiple jobs. There are plenty of people (whom I do not know personally) who end up homeless because they can't provide for themselves for many different reasons, and who do not resort to violent crime.

If poor people are more inclined to become criminals, then most Africans, Indians, Afghans, etc, should be so "more inclined to become criminals". Well, that's exactly what those people argue who want to control migration for their own political gains. That's what Nigel Farage was doing when he stood in front of that poster with the line of refugees fleeing the war in Syria:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/16/nigel-farag...

(He was trying to terrorise the British with the spectre of poor -and foreign!- people entering the UK in large numbers.)

Equating poor people with violent crime is making some kind of fundamental mistake in reasoning.
Krateo PlatformOps – A Kubernetes-Based Self-Service Control Plane
Krateo Platformops is an open source tool platform that gives users the capability to create any desired resource on basically any infrastructure they'd like. Be it a K8s cluster, microservice, application, pipeline, database or anything else, Krateo has got your back. The only requirement is for the resource to be descriptible via a YAML file representing the resource's desired state (rings a bell? ).

Krateo allows for:

- Creating any kind of resources within and outside the Kubernetes cluster it runs on: whilst Krateo runs as a Deployment in a Kubernetes cluster, it can also create resources outside the cluster. You can use Krateo to create anything from new Kubernetes clusters, Logstash pipelines, Docker registries, API gateways, and many others.
- Focusing on the management of services: Krateo frees the user from most of the burden of cluster management, giving them the ability to entirely focus on the services that must be run. This results a phenomenal user experience that drastically reduces wastes of time.
- Single-handedly monitoring and controlling resources: Krateo also acts as a centralized control plane, letting users monitor anything ranging from CI/CD pipelines to pod statuses and open tickets on your JIRA. All the information you need is present on a single page -- you'll never have to guess the correct dashboard ever again.
>housing

>efficient market

That's already been destroyed by 50 years of city-enforced redlining and NIMBYism.
I think the democratic party is upset that everyone wasn't going along with the superdelegates who really have the first votes. They want to choose their candidate and go through the motions of a primary.
My understanding is that adding a lawyer to a conversation isn't sufficient to shield it from discovery. Instead you actually need to (a) be asking a lawyer for legal advice, (b) not cc or otherwise share with anyone who does not need that advice, and (c) not include unrelated matters. When I've written things that actually needed to be privileged I would start a separate email, address it only to the lawyer and specific people who also needed to know the advice, and keep the thread carefully on topic.

(Not a lawyer)
Given the stakes, these types of decisions, without judging whether they are good or bad, should be made by governments, or perhaps organizations like UN and not private companies.
Given that emoji are most typically used in text, having it all together seems better than two bodies coming up with incompatible solutions to emoji and the glyph issues of various languages.

In the end emoji is a language, a visual icon language.
Okay Singapore counts. It’s still capitalism and capitalism is a right wing ideology. Cuba’s govt is doing well too. I always feel uneasy when capitalist societies that were always given near unfettered access to the Global South and free trade because the Global North didn’t sanction them. Those countries had it on easy mode. They didn’t do what Cuba has done. Or what Russia did in a few decades after 1917 or what China did in the 50s. I’m bordering on sounding like a tankie now, but I’m more so defending countries and people that had to do things the hard way.

Nothing is the root of all evil but “evilness” has almost always been done from a right wing perspective. Yes authoritarian leftists exist but I’d argue it’s impossible not to have to behave like Cuba with freedom restrictions does when America and by extension, the Global North are capitalist and imperialist bullies coming after you.

I still mourn for my parent’s country having us have their socialist leader murdered and replaced by an awful fascistic dictator.
> Given it hallucinates 98% of the time and produces incorrect code and also is unable to reason about why it is wrong, it is completely untrustworthy and requires humans to triple check the output. It cannot be used unsupervised and needs constant review.

what sort of heavenly company do you work at where most ICs aren't described by this sentence?
It's not, but the planned obsolescence advocates sure love it, since they can make products self-destruct and eco-virtue-signal at the same time.
You've not heard about the mandatory neurolink's yet?
>COVID couldn’t even figure out how to redirect institutional toilet paper into consumer toilet paper. And that’s the same product!

Did the TP "shortage" actually get bad enough that a non-negligible portion of the population had nothing to wipe their bums with? Regardless, starving is much more dire than having nothing to wipe with. If people were actually starving, I'm sure they would have no issues eating field corn intended for animal consumption.
coreweave.com has pretty cheap GPUs
Somebody else who knows how to Google already replied to you, now I expect you to fully read the link.
I'm glad I am not the only one who thought this was complete and total BS. I agree with other commenters that this post is designed to create hype and acquire more funding.

Many people have argued (successfully imo) that AGI is not even possible[1]. LLMs are not even trending in the direction of AGI. They are trending in the direction of annoying spam[2] and making our jobs harder[3]. A brave new world where anyone can generate hallucinated nonsense and feel clever for doing so.

[1] Why general artificial intelligence will not be realized https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-020-0494-4

[2]A sci-fi magazine has cut off submissions after a flood of AI-generated stories https://www.npr.org/2023/02/24/1159286436/ai-chatbot-chatgpt...

[3]CheatGPT https://blog.humphd.org/cheatgpt/
Now, let me tell you about the harms of seed oils on your engine
Raw terminal mode is used for TUI programs, so the article is about setting a panic hook to get everything working in that case.
Buried in a footnote:

> we now believe we were wrong in our original thinking about openness, and have pivoted from thinking we should release everything (though we open source some things, and expect to open source more exciting things in the future!) to thinking that we should figure out how to safely share access to and benefits of the systems
Ticketmaster is still going strong with no truly serious threats to their Enshittififation business plan. Seems pretty immune to me.
I urge you to read your own earlier comment and see if the two make sense to you when taken together.
> feminism told women they can have it all. Turns out work doesn't leave much time for having kids.

How many jobs are fulfilling enough one would want to sacrifice family time, or even just housework for? Doctors, scientists, architects, engineers, artists.. after that, the vast majority of jobs are just a way to make ends meet, not a means of self-fulfillment.
Heh—I mean, a lot of workplaces don't give those observed days off, but schools do, so it'd be convenient for parents if they were also off on those days, and it might make it an easier sell to businesses.

[EDIT] But I do get your point :-)
The article said that productivity increased. How did this "20% tax" appear?

Or are you saying that shorter work weeks will be an excuse to price gouge? That's valid. Any change seems to be an excuse to price gouge.
Nothing is going to happen until we start imprisoning executives for this sort of flagrant illegal behavior. Fines and settlements mean nothing.

People like Sundar Pichai, Eric Schmidt, etc need to be labeled as anti-social criminals & face the justice system.
See's candies are not essential goods or service. This is a prototypical first-world problem.

Capitalism has lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty in the last century by essentially targeting inefficiencies.

But here we are worrying about price of high-end candies.
Sometimes there are a lot of options
If, and I think it's a big if then it will be the same as every technological advance in recent times. The individuals currently with money and power with monopolise it and impoverish the rest of us. It has happened so many times why would it be different this time.

I overheard some colleagues naively hoping capitalism will find a way and we'll just have to work less. This is just not true, look to any of the deindustralised cities in the west, where unemployment, crime and poverty are rampant in once great and cities, where whole communities are essentially forgotten about as an inconvenient truth. That's the future if this stuff works.
They weren't asking, were they? They decided they were going to force us to read their bastardised version and what are you going to do about it?
More than 40% (2022 data, NAHB research) of the cost of new multifamily development is tied to regulation/permitting/zoning.

That number has climbed faster than inflation for some time and is the largest driver of increased multifamily development costs.

Want cheaper housing? Make it easier to build housing.
Product is on autopilot, company ran out of money and couldn't raise further funding. I'm not offering help to find product/market fit and not showing these things to sell the product. Just offering help to fellow founders trying to get something off the ground. I managed to do that part.

Btw sorry for your issues with the product. We were a small team, we raised $2m in 2019, but didn't launch that product until 2021. We just didn't have enough time to execute on it effectively.
Exactly.. But the funny thing is as an IT admin at hospital, I have seen people who literally were saving mail in their trash folder in hopes to "archive" then got mad when we did some house keeping in Exchange.
Sounds like a McKinsey report!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jFqhjaGh30
Marxist analysis isn't that rare in my experience.
Where would they belong if not Unicode?

Emoticons are a "writing system" (whether or not you believe them to be more "text" or "meta-text") that needs encoding, and one that was encoded in standards that predated Unicode. (They were at first added for compatibility with CJK systems that had already been using them for some time. They've been greatly expanded since those original encodings that Unicode "inherited" from other text encodings, but they started as text encodings in other standards.)

Personally, I think Unicode actually did the world a favor by taking ownership of emoji and standardizing them. There's nothing "weird" that emoji do that doesn't exist somewhere else in some other language's text encodings. Things like ZWJ sequences for complex graphemes existed in a number of languages that Unicode encoded well before emoji. Emoji being common and popular helps break certain Western-centric assumptions that language encodings are "simple" and 1-to-1 code point to grapheme, assumptions that had been needed to break for many years before emoji gave Unicode users a tool to test that even "Western developers" needed to respect if they wanted happy users. Better emoji support is better Unicode support across the lovely and incredible diversity of what Unicode encodes.