skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've done something pretty similar with an Adafruit Macropad, Karabiner Elements (and Zoom's global hotkey support), hass-cli, and a few esphome-loaded ESP32 devices. Physical audio/video mute, raise hand, lights, speaker/headphone switch, and screen lock buttons are wonderful.
Plot twist: Hacker groups were secretly funded by security firms.
And they are free to let it die..
Well it's good to hear that it's done properly else where! I absolutely agree with the salary difference. I'm early enough in my career (no spouse or children either) that I'm willing to spend more time for more compensation, but I can see myself valuing that extra day off way more in the future as well.
This. We already had discussions of 'attacks' on models based on public data sets so 'good sets' may soon become the thing to go after ( and suddenly data brokers may really want to up the prices of their sets ). We might actually see more privacy as a result as the data brokers will start charging a premium for clear sets.

Naturally, as predictions go, don't quote me on that. I was wrong before.
We have our own design systems, and we'd just use regular CSS classes instead.
Do you mean the same code that has its own Wikipedia page where the exact code is written, comments included, and has probably been copy pasted into 100’s of other projects?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_inverse_square_root
> Google’s duty to preserve documents began when it reasonably anticipated litigation. According to the company’s privilege logs, beginning as early as May 2019, Google began withholding materials “compiled in connection with ongoing DOJ investigation.” The United States then issued its first Civil Investigative Demand (CID) to Google on August 30, 2019, and issued two subsequent CIDs in October 2019.

If I'm reading this right- they allege that Google knew because they had already began withholding some materials and were issued 3 CIDs.
Doing the dishes has a purpose, but I still don't want to spend 80 hours a week doing them, especially not at the rates it would pay. Lots of meaningful work is also quite hard work that has an upper limit even if it is purposeful.
AI fitness coaching coupled with pose detection (not in the app yet):

https://app.gymmrfitness.com/
I might accept information sharing of rents and price levels. And someone guessing what market will bear.

But having someone approve pricing? That is clearly something worth prosecuting and heavily fining for.
The market valuation of a company ($N trillion) is not a measure of the assets that company has. The real estate may be 2% of their market cap but a much greater proportion of their actual assets.

Don’t get me wrong it’s all still BS though :)
This is just a schtick they are going to pull up until someone stupid buys them.
As an average scunt main I would to inform you that you are wrong. You say that the pyro nerf was bad. Duck you (politly) pyro is dumb. I hate it when I get spy checked by m1 combo every second stop. Pro play is good game good j_peg #1 pro player, bad water mid, sawmill foeva. Crits make tf2 good I know random crits can be poopy sometimes but it’s funny random crit amazing yes gamim
Your future sounds pretty dystopian and very lonely though....
Ah yes, the noble declarations of righteousness and forethought. I am so grateful that such an esteemed and pure-of-heart company is taking care of our future. /s
> HTTP as easy examples are simple blocking request-response

Well HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2 (and HTTP/3) surely not. You can make more request on a single channel and also the server can send you data you didn't requested (PUSH). Otherwise a modern site with a ton of resources would either take a minute to load or have to open 100 connections to the server.

MQTT is another example of protocol that works this way.

> "every" is just not true

Every protocol that was born after the 90s, let's rephrase it like that.
If it's anything like our current LLMs, it will improvise an answer with great certainty.
I’m curious, what is the legal process for dealing with manufactured privilege?
Is the DoJ's argument that if you anticipate being sued in the future, you're not allowed to use private messaging at all?
> A culture war is a cultural conflict between social groups and the struggle for dominance of their values, beliefs, and practices.[1] It commonly refers to topics on which there is general societal disagreement and polarization in societal values.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_war

It sounds like you are confusing culture with aesthetics.
Relevant reading:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34471720

Ask HN: How did Sam Altman fail upward so well? (33 days ago, 119 comments)

(skip down a bit for the real content)
the focus on non-proprietary training datasets and computational efficiency for the purposes of reducing costs and democratizing access is pretty cool!

it is interesting how model performance seems to scale almost linearly with size for the sizes chosen. (or perhaps not, perhaps the researchers are choosing to focus on the part of the performance-size response curve that is linear).
Last I checked, and it's been awhile, Wire is not only centralized, but also keeps contact lists online --- in other words, they've kept an SQL database of who's talking to whom across their whole service, serverside.

If that's changed (or if someone wants to point out that I'm wrong about that, which is always possible), I'd appreciate the update.
Why don't you just... not?

I do not agree the upsides of AGI are great, or outweigh the downsides. Look at the massive downsides of the tools you've already released. Your track record is already terrible.

And even if I believed benefits were there, there's no way in hell I would trust a for-profit corporation to manage them appropriately. I'm not sure there is an organizational structure that currently exists that I would trust.

Just stop.
Certainly debatable how close it is, but it seems obvious that it's improving in general ability. It's surely not moving away from AGI.
Paper Models of Vintage Computers
Why would it be able to? At best think of AGI as everyone working together, and everyone working together has not found any evidence of aliens. Could AGI and automated factories build better detectors, yes. Could lots of humans with better funding built better detectors, yes. But at the end of the day the hard work of actually detecting signs of alien life will be the only way to answer this question with a yes.
When does it not work, generally speaking?
Yeah, I've heard that the heat from all the Uranium in the center is a big reason the core is still hot.
Scaling law is for training till convergence. Both PALM and this model have been undertrained. See the training loss plot in the paper.
Almost as fun as SPARK's own Rod Chapman doing some tweetnacl porting and proof https://blog.adacore.com/sparknacl-two-years-of-optimizing-c...
Originally published at https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Asia-Insight/Japan-readies...
I don't know about you, but as far as I'm concerned ChatGPT passes the Turing test with flying colors. I even told him (?) that, and the response was quite humble:

Me: by the way, if I may add something tangential, in my opinion you pass the Turing test 100%
ChatGPT: Thank you for the compliment! However, as an AI language model, I am not capable of passing the Turing test in the strict sense, as the Turing test requires fooling a human judge into believing that the AI is a human. While I strive to generate responses that are human-like and informative, I am still fundamentally a machine, and my responses are generated by algorithms rather than human thought processes.
Tutanota email service: end-to-end encryption and no ads
let's keep it to one thread. I'm ending it here.
I answered this question a few comments above: no. I was correct the first time. My biggest problems with Unix shell as it is, and if I cannot change the OS interface, are process groups, handling of exit codes and using exit codes in boolean context. If I were to work on a shell alternative to standard Unix shell, I'd remove the reliance on system calls related to creating pipes and process groups and would do this in the shell to escape the wrong way it's currently done by the system.

Another thought I have is re-designing the work with processes and their output in the way similar to Erlang's ports. I'm not sure this can be done in all instances, but I would definitely give it a try.

There are other minor evils, like return vs exit that needs to be solved... but, I really don't have a plan for making my own shell, so all the above is just based on particular pain points I had with it over the years, so, I don't really plan on making my own shell. But, equally, and even more so, I have absolutely no intention to use PowerShell, especially because I'd have to maintain hundreds of unrelated pieces of code, each with its own versioning history and a huge compatibility matrix. That just sounds like insanely boring and unproductive way to spend my life.
preparing for next 10B round.
Telegram doesn't do E2E group chats at all.
Think about sinking to the bottom of the Marianas Trench and then inflating a balloon just enough to make you neutrally buoyant. The net force on you will be zero, but you'd still be crushed by the pressure, which is the effect of many kilometers of seawater above you.

Another way to think of this is to imagine a small sphere (like the size of a basketball) around the very center of the Earth. The matter in that sphere feels no net gravitational force, but it has to push back against the entire mass of the rest of the Earth, which is trying to fall into it.
I remember first using Bitnami in 2015- such a great resource. Although now everything in VMWare land is extremely enterprise/data-center-y its nice that they still ship stuff like this to hobbyists in the public.
No, most people put more effort into appearing to do work if there is some micromanaging ass spying on them. I would guess more time pretending to do work than doing anything actually productive (see people who love to schedule unending meetings)
Apples to oranges.

(... and the reason Google does Drive Trash is that destroying user data is a much worse user experience than letting the delete be lazy, even when the user has given signal they want the data destroyed. There's decades of UX research to back that assertion; it's why "trash cans" were created in the first place as a UI abstraction.

Internal to Google, if you want to blow your whole leg off and disrupt your career by deleting some critical info, that's on you. Outside Google, they try to provide a better experience for their users).
"The code is licensed under the GPLv3, which permits commercial use." Yann on Twitter
You don't think solving every disease is a significant upside?
That was the end of the last deployment cycle (at least in the US), when the wave of 3G to LTE deployments stopped.
This is a perfect example of do less with less.
I agree.
Next step. Majority of CP is filmed in homes where children live. To protect the children every home must have a government monitored camera in it so that the safety of the children can be insured. You don't have anything to hide do you? No criminal activity going on?

There is no way this doesn't quickly turn into full government monitoring of everything being sent over technology. Before that even, I assume the search for CP will be done via image hashes provided by a government database. Whats to stop the government from simply putting a hash of information it does not want public? The snowden files or something similar. Quickly identify and remove leakers.

Its a very slippery slope.
I don't really think so other than maybe some people would take off early for their 3-day weekend.
Interesting that the core is oversized. 640Km should be enough for any body.
Why I'm running away to join the circus (really)
DOU is pretty big for developer jobs. https://jobs.dou.ua/
I think it's weird people are stuck on treating the real-world system of capitalism and ideals about how markets should work as synonymous. It's possible to criticize capitalism for its failures without necessarily questioning the underlying ideals about markets. They're not the same thing. Markets and market-thinking predate capitalism, and exist in and affect all kinds of non-capitalist systems, today and historically. They aren't solely a feature of capitalism, and capitalism isn't the same thing as markets.
You pointed it out well - within the context of the rest of the message, these emoji, _together with the Res of the message_, could sign a financial advice. Without the rest of the message, no.
DLP, overall architecture, and many more aspects put the kibosh on that.

The career risk isn't worth it especially when tech is deployed client- and network-side to detect just such exfil attempts. The average of network, security, and client management staff tend to be PEs (SREs) who can code, some have PhDs, and are the cream of what was previously organized as "corporate IT" world. So I fail to see any incentive to throw away their career and reputation by giving away IP for $0.

There's a metric s*ton of optimized hardware to generate models. And I have my doubts if Sama at OpenAI, even with 10 gigabucks from Microsoft, can sustain growth, organizational culture, and long-term investment at the scale others are bringing online with less trouble and more experience.

The future interaction will AI models will most likely be through an API because the models themselves are becoming too large to fit even on the most extreme DIY NAS solutions.

TL;DR: it's not happening.
>As our systems get closer to AGI, we are becoming increasingly cautious with the creation and deployment of our models.

Who do these people think they are? They didn’t even invent the architecture GPT3 is built on! This is as bad or worse than Elon claiming full self driving is just around the corner for almost a decade!
> I think he's helped a lot by the self-moderating community.

That's true, and in this sense the moderators proper are really just a proxy for the community. We don't know how to build an entirely self-moderating community (I wish we did...it would be so much less work) but we do know how to take the temperature of the community and fill in the bits that the system can't accomplished unsupervised. Or at least that's what we're gunning for.
When I first read the title I could have sworn it's a post from The Onion
The thing is that, at least as far as we know, these drugs don't have any direct effect on the brain. Any effect they have is apparently from adjusting hormone levels and possibly some metabolic effects.

It's also interesting that they were designed to treat diabetes then we also discovered they reduce hunger. My guess is that we may have assumed the cause-effect relationship is more straightforward than it actually is.

I also want to see what happens if we take the people who criticise us for relying on a drug instead of willpower/mental conditioning, then give them a drug that does the opposite of these ones. My guess is they'll overeat and get fat. Much like animals do in animal studies. Ignoring your body constantly telling you to eat is almost impossibly hard over the long term.

Humans have a tendency to assume that we have much more free will than any kind of scientific evidence tends to show.
If AGI gets created.. I hope it scans humanity, turns around and tells us we suck!
I think it's young - and perhaps JAX itself is not so specialized to a specific task (but there's plenty of libraries for deep learning focused tooling, although not as mature as PyTorch). It has often been said in other threads on JAX, but it feels like a very different type of library from other AD systems -- the focus on concisely exposing/allowing users to express composable transformations seems novel! (But I may be mistaken)

But in general, I would suspect youth.
I can't say I appreciate adding package.json support, but I also don't see it as necessarily a bad thing.

In my opinion, it would be a bad thing if this encouraged everyone to start using Deno as a stand-in for Node and make more Node patterns typical in Deno development. If package.json is there merely for backwards compatibility then that's one thing. On the other hand, if things drift towards doing everything the Node way again... well, I'm sure there's someone this very moment writing a "better" package manager for Deno that "solves everything for real this time." And I don't look forward to the flurry of package managers for Deno. Who's ready to decide whether "nary" is better than "dpm" or "pdpm"?
You cannot prove or promise that an AGI would be willing to do that, or anything, even if it could.

The whole problem of "general" intelligence is that the "general" implies agency. If an AGI exists, it has agency, and it can do or not do things.

The humans with agency we have in the world are already enough of a problem. Let's not add superintelligent computers.
source: trust me bro
X-Keys (mentioned by the author as his source of the relegendable keycaps) and Genovation are two manufacturers of programmable macropads popular for commercial and industrial use. Especially Genovation can be found pretty cheap on eBay (I see as low as $25 right now). If you're looking used, also consider PrehKeyTec for larger programmable keypads ranging up to full-size keyboards with triple function rows and the gap between arrow keys and navigation block filled in (magstripe reader and keyswitch too, these are mostly popular for POS applications).
think of the desktop "console" like the dash on your car before touchscreens. eventually, muscle memory knows where the buttons are and you can access them without looking. it just has to be useful enough to use often enough for it to become muscle memory.

i've sat in amazement watching a colorist navigate the large panels without ever taking their eyes off the screen/scopes. there are so many knobs, roller balls, buttons that it is almost sci-fi. lots of other jobs are like this with dedicated gear, and it's part of the mystery of how they do what they do
Resident Evil 4, Prototype and Deus Ex: Human Revolution immediately came to mind. Massive replay value.
I think the argument is, if you are on a lit hold and preserving some of your written communications, then you have to preserve all of them. You can't decide to shield some of them. That makes sense, I guess, but why would that not apply to verbal communications as well?
Looks like a strictly inferior version of KSP1.

Unfortunately seems very unlikely that they can deliver on promises of multiplayer interstellar colony building when it's still so feature light after 3 years of delays
Nothing scientific but on motorcycle forums I used to frequent people often blamed E15 for seals swelling up and no longer working. I can’t say if that’s the cause but I did have a face gasket between the fill neck and tank expand. After sitting out for a few days it shrunk back to its original shape.
OpenAI arguably already has AGI. GPT-3/ChatGPT is much better than the average human at coding, text summarization, etc. (“system 2” cognitive tasks).
Soon: It was The AI. We can’t do anything, since we can’t predict how it behaves. Turns out this time it wanted to protect Google, but ya never know.
You don't think OpenAI won't price-gouge the shit out of everyone suffering from those diseases? Not even that - you don't think they won't sell exclusive licenses for this kind of thing?
Somebody at Google made the conscious decision that enacting this intentionally defective policy -- in doing so, attempting to foist liability for data custody upon individual employees -- and fighting the inevitable objections to it was a preferable course of action to actually preventing their employees from discussing anything that might be used against them in the suit. It's clever, but it doesn't reflect fondly on Google's underlying antitrust behavior, and I'd be pissed as an employee.
Looks at costs. Poor nations have high fertility. Rich nations have low fertility despite having an abundance of everything people in poor nations would clamor for.
we're going to be biodiesel
What I recall of the standard algorithm is that it does include font/user-agent/locale pieces in its calculations and "zero ambiguity" is a bit of a stretch, unfortunately.

Even the overview includes this note:

> Note: Font-based information may be required to determine the appropriate unit to use for UI purposes

First of all, grapheme counting depends on normalization and there's like 6 Unicode normalization algorithms to consider, depending on locale and intended use/display style.

Keep in mind that grapheme counting includes things like natural ligatures which English has always had a rough time counting. Things like `fi` and `ft` that sometimes form single visual graphemes from the font's perspective for some serif fonts but are always supposed to be counted as two graphemes from the user's perspective.

Relatedly, one of the simpler parts of the Unicode standard algorithm is that the ZWJ always signals a grapheme cluster/merged grapheme, so per the standard algorithm the Ninja Cat is always a single grapheme even though the usual emoji rules for all the non-Microsoft fonts that don't include Cat+ZWJ+Job sequences ("cats with jobs emojis") fallback to two display characters to try to get the idea across, the spec does say that they should still count that as only a single grapheme even when not presented as such.

(ETA Aside: I think the cats with jobs emojis are great and fun and should be wider adopted outside of just Microsoft. Why should only the people emojis have jobs?)
Before:

> Our goal is to advance digital intelligence in the way that is most likely to benefit humanity as a whole, unconstrained by a need to generate financial return. [0]

After:

> Our mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence—AI systems that are generally smarter than humans—benefits all of humanity.

In this sentence, they missed out the part where they are to be taking VC capital and selling out closed AI snake-oil to the masses for the dream of AGI science fiction, whilst building untrustworthy systems that are glorified hallucinating black-boxes as a service.

Another overhyped multi-billion dollar exit scam.

[0] https://openai.com/blog/introducing-openai/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students%27_union
They'll do absolutely anything except try to make the economy better for young people.
How is that different from the CIA being able to sniff and access their servers thanks to the US patriot act? will they 'walk' from the US too? [1]

Oh, my bad, i almost forgot! it's the tech that's being tested to power the digital online passport, we'll get to see it first with twitter [2], then meta, then it'll expand everywhere else

Ahh, the joy of the bitcoin, who said china was evil with their social credit system? <:P (i did my best to picture a clown face)

The existence of the patriot act makes everything obvious

[1] - https://www.aquaray.com/en/blog/posts/cloud-act-patriot-act-...

[2] - https://twitter.com/wongmjane/status/1596615573303357440
Is any of his work about caste in the US or Seattle?

PPS: Mention of caste triggers most Indians, even those who are not living abroad. My wife (south Indian Brahmins) feels somewhat annoyed with my interest in caste. I won't ask my fellow Indians about caste, ever!! It triggers them more than saying bad thing about Modi.

I know the feeling. Asking for data on caste discrimination in US triggers the other set of Indians more than saying any good thing about Modi/India.
Maybe more of a slightly decaying orbit around AGI.
My Gmail Trash folder auto deletes after 30 days. I have never made that as a change, its a default.
If we really have AGI, it won’t be able to be controlled. We can’t even come up with a set of foolproof laws for humans and really on judges and courts for interpretation. Notice how many laws have “reasonable” in them (for example reasonable doubt , reasonable care, reasonable suspicion, etc).

Once we have AGI, it won’t be stoppable no matter what we imagine ourself doing. It will basically be like a teenager with superhuman intelligence.