skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So spend the time doing the hard bit, then introduce some complexity and a software turducken for the sake of calling it from a "simple" language. At which point I'd then ask the question are we really so scared of someone accusing us of overengineering that we're creating more complicated solutions to appear simple and pretending the complexity doesn't exist?
No, these are Fidelity clients that specifically direct sums from their investment accounts to be donated to charity. The donations come from clients that choose to, not Fidelity itself.
I don't understand why it didn't have the backing of the "tech world" and yet billions (if not trillions) of lines of COBOL are still being executed today?

When I first joined the industry, back in the early 90's, COBOL was very much the premier business coding language, and I think that only changed with the arrival of Java.

Can you explain further?
> by “Pair Programming” with an “AI” assistant

I would actually love this to be a thing, since if potential posters would read the Minimum Complete Verifiable Example page^1 it would cut down on so much of the "I am already frustrated and then my 'why no work' question was closed" drama

I wouldn't even need advanced AI to get it done, as the existing Eliza's "why do you think that is?" model^2 would be pretty close

1: https://stackoverflow.com/help/minimal-reproducible-example

2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA#/media/File:ELIZA_conver...
Chromebooks have long done this, but then they have a lot less memory.
I doubt AI can actually write captivating stories. Sure it can string mostly coherent sentences together, but it can't develop complex story archs
Jimmy Carter was more than just a feckless president
1. The power to tax is the power to destroy, and,

2. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

If you want to amend the Constitution that’s another matter.
Can you share the YouTube video?
On the other hand - my dad is an industrial designer. He was initially irritated by how easy it was for lower grade designers to enter the field given the advent of new tools (even before computers). But he eventually embraced it and understood that the nature of his job changed to something more comprehensive. He just advised me to prepare for the same as a software developer in the age of ChatGPT. Perhaps he would say the same about writers.
> Night time is equated with freedom

The tagline and part of what is explored in a Fall anime - Call of the Night.

Was really good, highly recommend
Podman is also Red Hat do they win either way.

Anyway, I think that Podman is the mature Docker and tries to fit much better into the linux/unix-y way of doing things. Especially, being daemonless allows to integrate into systemd, etc. the way it should, and makes for a mature integration of containers into the ecosystem.
We personally came across the evaluation problem while building MakerDojo[1]. My current workflow is to run manually on 50 different test cases and compare the results against the previous versions of the prompt. This is extremely time consuming. And to be honest, I no longer test for every little change.

Some more contect - as a way to support MakerDojo[1], we are building TryPromptly[2] - a tool to do better prompt management. In that tool, we are building the ability to create a test suite, run the test suite and compare the results. At least knowing for which test case the results varied and reviewing them would go a long way.

Here is the format we are thinking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kLBIb7W0jrY-IkNPqJsN...

In addition, we are about to launch after test suite is to have live A/B tests in the production based on user feedback. Users can upvote or downvote their satisfaction with the results and that will inform you which version of the prompt yielded better results.

If you have other ideas on how to test them better, it would be super helpful to us.

[1] MakerDojo - https://makerdojo.io
[2] TryPromptly - https://trypromptly.com
> The leaked Department of Defense email data spanned three terabytes (the equivalent of dozens of standard smartphones’ storage)

...or millions of emails.

One example (from TechCrunch):

> One of the exposed files included a completed SF-86 questionnaire, which are filled out by federal employees seeking a security clearance and contain highly sensitive personal and health information for vetting individuals before they are cleared to handle classified information. These personnel questionnaires contain a significant amount of background information on security clearance holders valuable to foreign adversaries.

Yikes.
Here ist the technical introduction: https://github.com/safing/portmaster#feature-safing-privacy-...
Thanks! We're pretty excited about that feature. As for latency, it's normally better. We're feeling the HN traffic crunch at the moment and are working on scaling.
Games have also come up with additional monetization methods to increase the overall spend past $60. Things like DLC, Season Passes, Loot crates and now battle passes have increased the potential spend as a price discrimination strategy. CoD for example has "Cod Points", which are used to buy battle passes or skins putting the price at somewhere between $60 and thousands, somewhat similar to the approach mobile games take.
> Explicit is better than implicit

Says the language whose code-block-endings are invisible! I will never understand the desire of people to make the important punctuation in their language invisible. Python, CoffeeScript, YAML. These people just hate being able to see the important flow-determining punctuation in their language!
I still use the vanity email, but you just have to think about the phish-ability of it. I typically use login@domain.com or similar for logins, instead of first@domain, or first.last@domain. It is not guessable if someone knows my name, while being easy enough for me to remember and read out on the phone or say to a person.

I do own (or have a family member buy) most of the common lastname.tld's that exist. I'm just hoping that the confusion of uncommon tld's are a good defense. Eg. I hope CS agent won't easily believe login@vineyardmike.com should be login@vineyardmike.club or .wiki

I do like your idea of trying to trademark the name (and I considered it too) but my name is common enough (and a word in a European language) that others have tried already, and its already in use with a handful of businesses across the world.
I think any website where you can filter without any algorithms that think they are smarter than you, ads, seo, etc. is valuable. Imagine you had "direct" DB access to the data google, reddit, twitter, hackernews (we have HN on google bigquery, and its awesome), github, stackerflow, youtube, ... hold. Anyone who knows exactly what they want, will find it. People that don't know exactly what they want, may find it harder to find anything.

I don't know about your specific use case, but personally anything like that is valuable to me.
reminds me of PG

> The fact that there's no market for startup ideas suggests there's no demand. Which means, in the narrow sense of the word, that startup ideas are worthless.

http://www.paulgraham.com/ideas.html#:~:text=The%20fact%20th....
Have they tested for dioxins? Can you share?
This "meltdown" is a highly known outcome of the practice (and kinda why people historically do it with guidance in a safe space with a lot of time-honed set of best practices from thousands of years of history).

It's kinda like people who are in reasonably healthy mental shape suddenly decide to run an ultramarathon of the mind. I'm not sure if OP may have the correct expectations.
> This is true in principle, but the reality is more complicated. When we say “NP-complete is hard” we’re talking about worst-case complexity, and the average-case complexity is often much more tractable. Many industry problems are “well-behaved” and modern SAT solvers can solve them quickly.

This is a really cool point, no one ever mentioned this to me when I learned about this stuff at university. I wonder though, is there data for this ? Are businesses willing to take the risk and how do they mitigate ?

I'm not sure how popular they are in the wild, but there are a lot of approximation algorithms as well for solving version of these problems that are almost-but-not-quite the same. I wonder if that's just what lots of real-world use cases actually need.
Many countries find it useful to encourage some behaviors and discourage others by means of tax policy. Not just the US, although the US seems to do it quite a bit.

So we have, or have had, tax policies in the US that encourage home ownership, marriage, donations to charity, long-term investment, purchasing electric vehicles or electrifying your house, and more. The results of each of these is mixed, and sometimes contentious, but they're all there because congress decided at one point or another that a thing was worth encouraging or discouraging.
Lead author of new Cochrane review speaks out
Amazon employees push CEO Andy Jassy to drop return-to-office mandate
> According to the order, the Church was concerned that disclosure of its portfolio, which by 2018 grew to approximately $32 billion, would lead to negative consequences.

If you don't report your trades or positions, you can insider trade all day to your hearts desire, or in this case by the hand of God Almighty
Well the classic work on sociology of mental illness is not about schizophrenia but about suicide (Emile Durkheim’s Suicide). The same types of social causes can be observed with schizophrenia, though, in the facts of geographic disparities in diagnosis as well as changes (usually increases in recent history) over time. See for example, how urban environments are more likely to give rise to schizophrenia [1].

Also recommend like I said Gregory Bateson’s work, or more recently books like The Myth of the Chemical Cure by Dr. Joanna Moncrieff.

The general point is that if we want to model causality we have to include the full system in question. If we narrow our perspective to an inner sub-system, then anything outside looks like an exogenous cause. But we may have to keep expanding wider and wider to get an accurate picture. Intervention can be done at any level of granularity, but the lower it is done, the more we’ll be missing on the root cause of damage, which is likely causing harm elsewhere too.

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049530/
I’d much prefer to talk directly with a founder than watch a pre-recorded video.
When looking at things like long term personal properly ownership it gets difficult to make a good risk assessment.

For example, you are a nomad generally sleep in the wilderness. What are the risks of a tree branch falling on you at night over your lifetime, or lighting hitting the tree verses the risk of a hailstorm beating you down. Which provides the less risky shelter.

I would not count natural disasters and terrorism on the same scale. For the vast majority of individuals terrorism is so much more low risk that it's nearly a rounding error. Terrorism is generally a pin point. Natural disasters are 'generally' not. A hurricane will not only affect you, it will affect everything around you. All services around you can be shut down for an indefinite period of time leading to a situation where you have no food, water, or shelter.

There are also non-individual risks, such as choosing where to build a nuclear plant or hospital. Do you build your hospital, a complex that could remain there for 100+ years, in the path of a potential tsunami? Do you build it in the foothills farther away where it won't be destroyed, but in the meantime makes people go farther to reach it?

I personally am not one for having society build 'close' to the ocean. The sea has no respect for property rights, and we just love socializing the insurance of buildings put in much higher risk zones than they should be.
Pricing is an illusion, buying a galaxy S23 ultra costs as much as a top iPhone. The difference is that android phones cover a much larger price range similar to PC laptops.
> Small crashes have to happen and as much pain as they cause, they are nothing compared to what will get heaved if they turn systemic.

The CMBS crash is very likely to be systemic.
"Can" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. I do not find it a credible threat, and doubt any of these companies do either. Perhaps one could argue that the 2008-2009 TARP handling of some banks or automobile manufacturers was a "light nationalization", as the US took control of _some_ stock of the affected companies. (This stock was later sold off for a profit.) But other than that, and _maybe_ the creation of the TSA in 2001, there isn't a nationalization in my living memory.

The nationalization of railroads under Wilson lasted from December 1917 to March 1920. During this time, operation (including expansion and maintenance) of all railroads was organized by the federal government. When the nationalization was repealed in 1920, the US paid rail companies for lost profits.
Well, not really, it just means that grounds for rejection come from inadequacies between the applicants and the role, not because of the recruiter’s prejudice. I know how the law works in the US, that was more or less the point. The fact that it works like that in one country or several does not mean that it is just, moral, or natural. Non-discrimination should be the default state. It’s like a legal system where you would need freedoms to be explicitly granted, which is counter to our common definition of liberty (along the lines of “rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others”). By narrowing down the definition of illegal discrimination, one gives more power to the people who are already in a position of power and so one keep pushing the status quo away from equal rights.

This is the language in the universal declaration of human right: “everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status”. This is not US law, but the fact that this was written and accepted by the vast majority of the countries on earth at least indicates that we (including nominally the US government) tend to hold that discrimination itself is morally wrong, regardless of whether the reason was put on a list or not. So it is not an unimaginable concept.
you reminded me of some John lenon comment on ego death :

I got the message that I should destroy my ego and I did, you know. I was reading that stupid book of Leary’s; we were going through a whole game that everybody went through, and I destroyed myself. I was slowly putting myself together round about Maharishi time. Bit by bit over a two-year period, I had destroyed me ego.

I didn’t believe I could do anything and let people make me, and let them all just do what they wanted. I just was nothing. I was shit. Then Derek tripped me out at his house after he got back from L.A. He sort of said “You’re all right,” and pointed out which songs I had written. “You wrote this,” and “You said this” and “You are intelligent, don’t be frightened.”

-- https://www.johnlennon.com/music/interviews/rolling-stone-in...
A Copper Catalyst Converts CO2 into Liquid Fuels
The details vary from country to country, of course, but some of the tax exemptions which religious groups get are actually just standard exemptions available to all non-profits, or all charities. English law has long defined "advancing religion" as a "charitable purpose". The Charitable Uses Act of 1601 (aka the Statute of Elizabeth) included "the repair of... churches" as a charitable purpose, and later case law took inspiration from that clause to view "advancing religion" more broadly as a charitable purpose. All common law legal systems have inherited this, although the extent to which they still focus on it varies (the concept still exists in US law too, but my personal impression is the US legal system nowadays pays less attention to it than the legal systems of the Commonwealth.)

When people advocate ending religious tax-exemptions, do they mean to end tax-exemptions specific to religious groups – but not available to charities in general, or non-profits in general? Or do they also mean to deny religious groups their status as charities? Or even their status as non-profits?
No doubt someone will submit a version of Asimov's "Someday"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Someday_(short_story)
Thanks for the feedback. We'll work on improving.

Running this question again, I got:

> For example, ski resorts at Lake Tahoe usually open after Thanksgiving and close in late April, with February offering the best skiing conditions. In Colorado, the ski season generally runs from mid-November through mid-April, with February being the best time to ski due to the deepest base depth of snow on the mountains and plenty of powder still pouring in. However, early snowfall can bring early openings, and the weather can be unpredictable. In Park City, Utah, the best time to ski is from December to March, with January being the busiest month due to the Sundance Film Festival.
In Sweden the industrial revolution brought on 8 hour shifts for around the clock production (IIRC). Something like 06-14,14-22,22-06. Could be similar.
Maybe that definition is flawed or better incomplete. In my experience narcissistic people react highly allergic to having their flaws shown to them/their flawless self image scratched. They'll do everything do everything to gain a sense of superiority again, when i continued with logically correct argumentation they got enraged and in the end responded with violence. I learned my lesson though, me wanting to be right/winning the argument was an attempt to dominate the other person. Life is way more fun if i get along with others.
Use of ChatGPT in Education (Research)
Hi,
I'm an undergraduate student, and in a few weeks have the opportunity to conduct some research on the use and effects of ChatGPT on a large sample of students.

I wanted to ask if anyone has some unanswered questions regarding the use of ChatGPT, affecting student performance and confidence in exams. These could be related to any topic, things we could gather data on, or just your thoughts :)

I precisely leave out some key details in this post, just so i recieve the most unbiased, unfiltered, just raw thoughts from the community.

Special thanks!!!
That seems like an extremely daft interpretation of what taxation is.
Is quic 100% backwards compatible drop-in replacement for tcp? No. Is it pointless to discuss. Also no.

And DC applications are far more easy to switch over than general internet, less middleboxes to screw you over, generally better performing networks, and more tightly controlled hosts.

Honestly, it wouldn't be all that farfetched to have AWS implement QUIC over SRD for squeezing the last perf drops out.
Bisection means dividing a curve into two equal parts.

Bifurcation means divide, split, or fork something into two.
sorry, you're still wrong. currency debasement and bitcoin aren't going anywhere.
https://github.com/richtr/NoSleep.js/

I wonder if something like this will get "extended" to work for desktop browsers now if this needs to become more popular?

I think something simple like looping an empty audio or video file will suffice. Not that I agree with that from a "hijack the user's browser without their consent" perspective. Just spitballing workarounds.
That creates an incentive structure for regulators to fine valuable companies and to do no harm to their long term value. It’s the opposite incentive structure you want in regulators.
The lawyers to back it up. Fines and judgements are subject to judicial review.
It should be proportionate to the size of the fund, because one of the reasons fines exist is for the deterrence effect. Ideally you want other potential perpetrators to think twice. Do you think this small fine has that effect?
That is an interesting way to categorize those functions of the brain, but philosophically, doesn't this leave us in the same place? Whether you classify it as ancient/modern, or subconscious/conscious, we're still talking about two modes.

In one of these modes we actively perceive/experience our concept of reality, and the other acts as a black box - not available for direct interrogation, but still possible to reason about via observations in conscious experience.

The issue I'm having with this take is that our definition of reasoning still depends on the black box. The experience of feeling like a being capable of reasoning and then using that ability to consider a problem is all built on a foundation of thoughts, sensations and feelings that just "appear" in conscious experience with very little evidence that the conscious mind had anything to do with putting them there.
I think that balkanization is unavoidable now. Even between US and EU. The EU is now planning to mandate a digital ID meaning anonymity will be something of the past, and personally that means I will disengage even more from the "mainstream" internet. I've already left all social media, Google etc due to the pervasive tracking but it's becoming harder to do stuff like banking etc that way (on a phone without Google play for example).

I think the US is a bit more hesitant to identify every internet user due to their penchant for freedom but of course they have a very bad history with convert surveillance.

I'm kinda hoping a darknet community will emerge of people who are averse to all this legislation. A bit like the early internet was. But without the rough edges of Tor. But so far that hasn't happened.
This piece reminds immediately of Taft, "the first to use the Presidency to climb to the Supreme Court", or the very active political life of John Quincy Adams after his mandate.

But it is an interesting and nice perspective in general - "even more after the top", or "substantive top after the formal top". Whatever that "top" may be.
You’re commenting everywhere in this thread. A large part of college is about socialization. Staying up until 1am drinking beer and playing video games with a few friends is absolutely a part of college. Just because people are staying up until 1am, 2am, etc doesn’t mean they’re parting. They’re just being young adults.

I got hired by a big tech company right out of high school. Skipped college. I’ve done well for myself career wise, but I certainly regret not having the “college experience”.

You seem to be quite harshly judging those who used college as a place to have fun, as well as building life skills.
The 5 Eras of AI Convergence
Yeah, probably. Even doing the modding in real time would help, I think:

"Your question appears similar to these other questions, do they answer your question?"

"Your question appears to be a rant, and doesn't actually ask a question. Is this true?"

"Your question is easily solved: you have mis-spelled this configuration setting. Would you still like to post it?"
That distribution is quite PERT
To be frank, this sounds like the feature I'd like to avoid most. I'd rather accept an OOM warning instead of dropping background tabs.

I don't even use that much tabs, around 30 at most, but this is the thing I use them for: to keep the current state.
Would you mind sharing what exactly it got wrong and how we can do better?
I personally wouldn't mind eliminating every religious organization, since religion is not any specific organization, but rather a personal belief system and a way to live your own life. Large groups of people (the execs that run the orgs) deriving income and wealth from that personal experience is demented. Christians and others shouldn't be afraid of their religion being destroyed, just the corrupt organizations that prey on their personal beliefs in order to further their own agendas.