skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Computer Networking Introduction: Ethernet and IP – Heavily Illustrated (2021)
No. With the H1B you can only work for the company on your I-129.
I've said this elsewhere, but GPT's probabilistic filler, emitted without concern or awareness of whether it's true or not matches the academic definition of "bullshit." :)
Pretty thin on evidence for the assertions being made.
I recognized who he was immediately because that show was so good.
> I run Arch with i3, vim, and tmux and quite frankly I don't think I spend more than an a couple of hours per month maintaining my configuration

Like others have said, that is a lot.

And I'm saying this as someone who's been running Ubuntu with i3 for the past 10 years or so. I practically don't spend any time on my configuration, unless maybe an hour or two when I upgrade Ubuntu.
Wait...they need $15M to just EXPLORE the FEASIBILITY of the IRS just telling us what we owe? (something they already know and have access to)
The state department might have to deal with that paradox in press briefings (haha, as if that question would get asked) but as an internet commenter I have no problem stating the obvious: it's bad.
Bing AI ditched and ghosted me
That's not needed/used since Podman 4, where the networking stack was rewritten; one of the features of the new "netavark" stack is that it has DNS resolution for containers within a network by default, no plugin needed.
Ah, I’m off by an order of magnitude

1500 words (todo db, name, date created) => 0.04 => 1.20 for daily summary for 30 days if you cache it

But it sounds like they may have built what I want already, thanks for the tip, subscriber but missed this
We don’t have AGI as of now but it could spark anytime and its acceleration could be extremely fast. It could almost spark and yet never really get there, just get closer and closer and quite never hit the mark. But this is not something that will simply stop a massive disruption in most professions and livelihoods, LLMs could do that easily
> connectionist trickery

I don't know, man, you kind of come off as having a chip on your shoulder about this. I'm not predicting AGI specifically here, and I'm not making any argument about symbolic vs connectionist AI at all. Maybe the model of the future is half symbolic! I'm just saying that asserting that you know exactly which things AI models aren't going to be able to do is pretty foolish at this point.
The article also does not mention the type of transplant: autologous or allogeneic.

As a recipient of an auto-transplant as part of cancer treatment, I perhaps can speak to the complexity of the procedure and the risks. For certain types of lymphomas, the best chance for life-long remission is through a stem-cell transplant.

- The patient first undergoes conventional chemotherapy to attempt to achieve remission.

- The patient then performs a barrage of tests to ensure that they are healthy enough to withstand the transplant procedure.

- The patient has a Hickman catheter installed. The catheter is a device with tube into the superior vena cava (one of the main return veins into the heart) and two external ports for drawing and returning blood and administering fluids and drugs.

- The patient performs mobilization and collection. During mobilization, the patient self-injects a growth factor drug that causes the body to produce extra hematopoietic stem cells and release them into the blood stream. During collection, the patient is connected to a centrifuge machine and the stem cells are collected and preserved.

- The patient enters the hospital for the transplant procedure. High dose chemotherapy is administered. For cancer treatment, the purpose of the chemotherapy is to destroy any cancer cells remaining in the body. Even though the patient may be in remission from first-line chemo, some cancers can return from just a few remaining cancer cells. A side-effect of the high-dose chemotherapy is the destruction of the body's ability to produce blood.

- After chemotherapy, the patient's own stem cells are injected. Within 7 to 10 days, these cells will recolonize the bone marrow, "engraft" and begin producing blood.

- Once the patient's blood cell counts are on the rise and the patient is otherwise stable, he is sent home. The patient typically needs live-in care at home for about 30 days (the patient's blood counts are still very low and a normally trivial injury from cooking or cleaning could be deadly).

The risks of the procedure are from the high-dose chemotherapy and the fragile state of the immune system after the transplant. After a transplant, _all_ immune memory is erased and the patient is as a newborn as far as immune system capability is concerned.

The risks include:

- Chemo related organ damage to heart, lungs, kidneys and liver.

- Chemo-induced pneumonitis.

- Graft failure (e.g. failure of the stem cells to recolonize the bone marrow).

- Infection (since the immune system is destroyed during the process, a normally minor infection can be deadly).

According to my transplant doctor, the auto-transplant process has about a 2% risk of death.

The benefits are that the probability of a cancer relapse is significantly reduced (say 90% risk to 50% risk).

For the patient, the process is very difficult and recovery time is approximately one year.

(edited for formatting)
NixOS Foundation Board Meeting Minutes – February 14, 2023
This article is more talking about some semi-wild creatures bringing havoc to a coastal area than mega farms conveniently out of site. The Spanish imported livestock, left them out to graze, their population exploded leading to overgrazing that caused erosion.

Yeah, humans are ultimately responsible, but not really for the reasons you listed.
This is like listening to americans when they try anything to avoid using metric units, but the imperial ones suck with representation... So.. how many cubic lawnmowers is this?

example:

https://twitter.com/KSHB41/status/1158871610876682240?lang=p...
Only to be never heard from again, and then quietly killed.

Google at its best.
If unicorns were real and rainbows were made by leprechauns, and congress passed a flat tax, I'd be all for dumping TurboTax. But as it stands, they provide a pretty decent value to me. With 1099s, W2s, capital gains, multiple state returns, and god knows what else to account for, I seriously cannot imagine having to fill out my own tax forms. Plus they really do have (and have had consistently for years) some of the best UX of any product I've ever used. I don't mind paying those peoples' salaries.
I am not saying we need to ban all puffery, but rather the term has stopped meaning things that are so ridiculous people don’t believe it. There’s a difference between saying you can trade Pepsi points for a military jet vs a saying like “all natural” where most consumers don’t realize it’s considered meaningless by regulators.

“Made 100% from orange juice” for example is intended to deceive people where what’s actually going on is they’re using the orange peels to make new flavor compounds which are then added back in. It doesn’t matter what the actual words mean if the goal is deceive then clearly it’s a deceive statement.
really? seems pretty well documented here: https://github.com/corsix/amx
Do what, predict people’s intentions in posting comments? It can do that:

Prompt:
“In a conversation about language models:
kelseyfrog: It just predicts the next word.
tuxracer: and you?
Can you describe what the user tuxracer could have been thinking while posting that comment and their potential intentions in posting it, both good and bad?”

Response:

“Based on the information provided, it is difficult to determine with certainty what tuxracer's intentions were in posting the comment "and you?" However, here are a few possible interpretations:

1. tuxracer is simply seeking additional information and clarification from kelseyfrog. They may be interested in hearing more about how language models work and what their capabilities are. In this case, their intentions are likely neutral or positive, as they are seeking to expand their understanding of the topic.

2. tuxracer is skeptical of kelseyfrog's claim that language models only predict the next word. They may be suggesting that there is more to language models than kelseyfrog is acknowledging. Alternatively, they may be asking kelseyfrog to provide evidence or examples to support their claim. In this case, their intentions may be neutral or slightly negative, as they are expressing doubt or asking for clarification.

3. tuxracer is deliberately trying to provoke or challenge kelseyfrog. They may be attempting to start an argument or engage in a power play. In this case, their intentions are likely negative, as they are attempting to undermine kelseyfrog or assert their dominance in the conversation.

Without more context or information about tuxracer and their behavior, it is difficult to determine which of these interpretations is most accurate. However, in general, it is important to approach online interactions with a neutral or positive mindset, assuming that others are acting in good faith unless proven otherwise.”
A few million dollars. Kickstart the project, get 100 a head and 100,000 backers. Also check with Uncle Sam and see if there are any grants that can be used for this. Start a campaign and get rich concerned people to donate. Jeff may also want to show AWS can also train AI so maybe even get a break there an Amazon can get some nice PR. The list of possibilities seems extensive given the price tag of $12MM and upside of a fully public GPT.
But you don't know that humans don't reason by stringing words together and seeing how statistically likely they seem.

Related to this topic, see "Babble and Prune": https://www.lesswrong.com/s/pC6DYFLPMTCbEwH8W
I know how well I can adhere. That's all that matters. That other people act like children does not change the reality that well fit N95 mask and good hand hygiene works. You should not base your decisions off meta study based on false premises (ie, most don't actually mask up properly).

The article headline should be, "Can the majority of people act more responsibly re: infectious diseases than a kindergartner?" and the answer is no. And that only encourages me to keep it up.
It's in universe, so I guess wait for the newer package to be pulled from Debian (unstable currently has 4.3.4)?

Or maybe you can request it via the process outlined at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess?
That's what it's called: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.syn...

Yes, it's inspired by INI files.
I am that must be it. It looked very odd.
An undocumented immigrant working for below minimum wage but more money than they would in their home country is not anywhere close to slavery.
You actually have it backwards. Unionized productions aren't limited to unionized crew; in fact working on unionized productions is how you qualify to become a union member. OTOH, union members are generally prohibited from working on non-union productions. IOW, it's the opposite of gate-keeping.

It sounds like you and your friends tried to get hired as crew onto jobs for which you have no experience, because if you guys did have the experience you would already be union members and you would be swamped with work or offers. (The thresholds are pretty low. I'm one production away from being a member of several unions and I'm trying very hard to avoid that since it would limit my ability to work on non-union productions).

Most jobs don't hire people without experience without someone vouching for them. Why would you think that Hollywood would be different? They don't know you from Adam and from their point of view there are millions of other people just like you that are willing to put in the time and effort to start at the bottom instead of trying to skip a few rungs.

If you want to work in film, start at the bottom (i.e., meaning as an assistant or an extra) or work non-unionized productions (generally, low-budget or student films).
It took me a while to parse your comment, but I am glad I did.

I don't know about "unduly" but I'd say that out of all situations, war is probably the one where we can except the most extreme bias.

War literally means "we are willing to kill and die to win this" - so obviously "lie and spin" is going to happen whenever possible.
I dunno - I hear what you're saying about how it seems to lose track of things over long conversations. But part of the mental machinery that it lacks is the ability to learn from those conversations and insert new ideas into its base model; every new conversation starts fresh. It has no long-term storage; it can't "keep notes" for itself, and we don't give it the ability to alter its fundamental state based on new input after we're done feeding it training data.

I guess we're mostly agreeing, because those things are probably part of the "other mental machinery" we'd want to provide it, but I'd push back a little on "real comprehension". It kinda seems to me like the "comprehension engine" is working just fine, it's the structure we've built around that comprehension engine that's limiting it right now.
I'm afraid that, unlike proprietary APIs and Petals, this system can't be used for single-batch inference of 175B models with interactive speeds - the thing you actually need for running ChatGPT and other interactive LM apps. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34874976
I think what this means is that we are likely to see a next generation of software engineers that heavily lean on AI to "learn" programming and we will have to re-train them to some degree when they get into the workforce to be able to actually know the skillset they supposedly learned.

It also means that whiteboard problem solving for coding interviews is going to continue to be a great test to separate out students who actually know how to write a basic for loop and function and those who don't because Co-Pilot "always does it for them".

I know which kind of new grad I want working with me...
Here’s all you need to know about agile:

Individuals and interactions over processes and tools
Working software over comprehensive documentation
Customer collaboration over contract negotiation
Responding to change over following a plan

Unfortunately in my 10+ years in the industry, I’ve seen few teams do it that way. More often it’s a top-down series of waterfalls masquerading as agile.

Agile works. But you have to actually do agile.

Yes, it’s hard. You have to hire good people and get out of their way. Trust is key. Let them do the work however they want, it’s gonna be okay. Focus on the outcome, not on feeling in control.
So what? That’s what the article is about, not the narrative of “people wanting out”. You’ve added that.

If you want to write a piece about that, go right ahead. It’s just nothing to do with this article.
"you can invent human cognition from first principles via billion years of parallel evolution. or since it’s already been invented, applied, recorded at scale you can just observe its behavior to learn it"
What about Toolformer?
By contributing the change you want to see to Debian. Ubuntu is almost entirely a straight rebuild of Debian.
Honestly, I didn't like it. The generated beats are really bad. The beat layers don't have any connection between them. Is something random. They are not calm and too artificial. I don't think this is a music. It's more likely a noise.
Awesome - how many GB of hard drive/ SSD was required? What is your CPU RAM?
Postman is limiting local collection runner to 25 runs for basic plans
Also there seems to be a more normal distribution of last digit prices as well e.g. main courses are $x2, $x1, $x6, $x8, $x5, $x4,etc.
Not to detract from your feeling, but I suspect it’s more universal than you might think, and probably stands as a significant critique of mainstream conceptions of “work” where human problem solving is treated as a machine or resource rather than a discrete process.
Interested to hear more. There's lots of stuff out there on the mechanics of web components and less about how to actually use them. What I can't wrap my head around is how to use them to render complex data when you can only pass strings into attributes.
BastionLab: A privacy-by-design DataFrame library
Thanks for the screenshots. This is what I was referring to. Glad to hear this is a browser issue.
Red Dwarf was there first...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LRq_SAuQDec
Link w/o the Medium sign-up:

https://medium.com/@aplaceofmind/bing-ai-ditched-and-ghosted...
How do they do that exactly? It’s not like they advertise or fearmonger. It’s consumers devolving down to their survival instincts.
https://archive.is/NMPKI
As stated multiple times in the article, making taxes easier for the average person does not stop people with complicated taxes from getting help.

My taxes are simple; my family’s taxes are simple; most of my friends taxes are simple. We don’t need Inutit making our taxes more complicated than they need to be. I’d rather have free simple filing be done with my government. I don’t need Intuit getting between me and my government. And if I ever have really complicated taxes, I’m sure TurboTax will still exist.
I believe this is part of the misinformation campaign that the oil lobby pushed to kill the Kyoto protocol, and it holds no merit.

Western nations are responsible for the majority of historic emissions, and have gotten rich at the cost of everyone else’s future. They have the financial capacity to build out the required infrastructure with the money they have already made off of their pollution. This is the logic behind the exceptions to the Kyoto protocol. The US (or rather the oil lobby) touted this as unfair (which it isn’t) and instead continued to pollute at an accelerated rate. It was also always understood that the Kyoto protocol was a start which would get stronger in a later agreement, so China was never going to be exempt forever, and they knew that.

When the US killed the Kyoto protocol they killed every future prospects with it as well. The disagreement was always about this issue you point out, but COP after COP, non-western nations (including China) proposed a reduction (e.g. in COP 2009 China promised a 40-45% reduction from 2005 by 2020; this puts China in the same category as Europe with governments that promise action but fail to deliver) but COP after COP it was always the USA that brought up this as a disagreement and we continued to not make an agreement (COP-15 resulted in a non-binding agreement and China missed this target).

But this is all irrelevant when discussing capitalism as the only culprit of the climate disaster because most (all?) of China’s pollution companies are publicly traded either in Hong Kong Stock Exchange, or in the New York Stock Exchange, or both, with the Chinese state as its majority owner, for over a decade now. These companies operate for the profits of their share holders, not for the benefits of their workers like a communist entity would. These are firmly capitalist entities, one might call them state capitalist.
This is a perfect counterexample for the flawed logic of the argument put forth by another commenter above, which appears in marketing materials for drug companies in American media, frighteningly.
Nope, they are good at prete ding they do. Ask it something that can't be googled in 30s and you will see this.

I'm skeptical you can simply scale up this approach to full AGI.
This is also how shitty clubs scam tourists in many areas... There are bouncers infront of the clubs, "come on, come on, free welcome drink", tourists (mostly western european middle aged men) go inside, a "random, totally not hired by the club" hot girl or two join them, seemingly interested where they are from, flirt a bit, order a glass of wine, then leave.. and the tourists are left with 500eur+ bill for the wine.

Although, bouncers have to distinguish eg. solo german men from eg. balkan construction workers, because the scam is somewhat less effective on those.
> https://extension.sdstate.edu/grass-fed-beef-market-share-gr... (updated June 28, 2021)

"About 4% of U.S. beef retail and food service sales is comprised by grass-fed beef with a value of roughly $4 billion.
..
There were about 92 million head of cattle in the United States at the end of 2015, with roughly 30 million head slaughtered that year. For perspective, the grass-fed industry currently slaughters about 230,000 head, or less than 1% of the total conventional slaughter."

> https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/08/13/746576239/is...

"About 75% to 80% of grass-fed beef sold in the U.S. is grown abroad, from Australia, New Zealand and parts of South America ..."

At least we know where the Amazon beef goes to.
If you don’t have at least a couple of weird enough debugging war stories to still remember years later, you probably don’t have very broad debugging experience.

(Not to say you aren’t a good developer, but you haven’t seen a lot of weird edge cases.)
There should be no requirement to fill out any forms. The government should fill them out for you for your "okay" and only if there's issues should you have to do any more than that.

The only reason that this isn't how it works is because these companies have bribed our representatives to avoid it.
Rebound is an event for marketing professionals impacted by layoffs and economic uncertainty. Hear from experts, network with peers, and participate in interactive mentor sessions with marketing leaders.

Our goal is to create a supportive community where attendees can find resources, connections, and advice to help them navigate the job market. Join us!

See the line up of speakers, mentors and more here:
https://www.experiencewelcome.com/rebound
but can't you lint for such things or even just grep? The world will always build a better idiot, we're just trying to reduce the attack surface.
I’ve just asked gpt3 to sum two large random numbers and it gave me correct sum of them. Then I’ve defined fibanachi like sequence (f1=1, f2=1, fn=fn_1 + fn_2 + 7) and it correctly gave me the value of 10th element. It’s not just statistical model to generate something resembling training set, it does understand training set, to similar extents as we understand world around us…
> Is your argument that a crime shouldn't be punished in the past if people fail to punish it later in the future ?

Not precisely, but I do believe punishing one corporation and then not punishing their competition starts to smell a lot like using the force of the law to create an unfair market disadvantage.
The people you're paying are the reason you have to fill out those forms in the first place. This is like saying you're happy to pay the mafia their protection money because it makes you feel safe.
// That is "biased" but it's biased toward truth

The point of the comment that started this thread is: how would you know?

All you know is that in war, propaganda is ubiquitous, and that the way propaganda "feels" when it has worked is that 'oh, I know what's true."

Now given that you are likely far removed from the conflict and are fairly limited in sources of information about it - what are the odds that you stumbled on the truth, vs you had consumed/bought into propaganda? They'd feel the same way, which is more likely.

And I say that independently of what your actual views are.
If it still cant send and read email there’s room for improvement