skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm familiar with the theory. But in order to evaluate your claim "just because it's a computer program does not mean it's unintelligent", we would first need to agree on a definition of intelligence. I don't have one to propose, except to say that I think it requires more than merely an understanding of language.
containerd is a reasonably common container runtime used with Kubernetes
With Stable Diffusion and DALL-E there was a lot of talk about how it’s simply remixing/reproducing original art from the training set. The same is true here: Bing is remixing/reproducing dox threats from the training set.
If Microsoft wants to sell this crap, they need to actually tell people how they use it. Imagine if they had some big 10 minute ad of "here's how we use bing ai at microsoft" where its just all the internal business use cases they have for chatgpt that could be generalize able to any other business. Unless they don't use it at all internally of course, which would be embarrassing.
One of the authors here. Just catching up on the awesome feedback in this thread - thanks!

I just thought this was a fun list of links to put together (like it's 1994!) and TBH I was not expecting quite this degree of positive reception.

Happy to answer any questions!
> it's more reliable than ChatGPT and saves me quite a bit of time.

What evidence is there that the results you get now are significantly faster or better than the non-AI results you got before? Particularly for queries of the form in your example.. I really wasn't having much difficulty getting those answers before these products existed.
Ownership is a time-wasting idea; an object should be freely able to go anywhere in the program you need it to go without any concerns.
Assuming these are serious questions… there are water treatment centers that water from reservoirs go through before they enter the pipes that go to your tap.

Also, no reservoir anywhere is only used for almond watering. That’s hyperbolic. Almond farmers get thirsty too.

:)
I just find this fascinating.

The AI has a kind of memory now.
It's so the middle managers can see that the line managers have done some due diligence. This is to prevent the case where line managers "don't have a good feeling" about an employee but can't point to specific items that have been communicated to the employee.
In an ideal world with great line managers you wouldn't need a performance review, it would be handled in 1:1s.
That's not our world and we need rigid formal systems to increase the likelihood that basic steps are followed, on average across many managers and employees.
As an American I tend to think of European and British police as being less violent, because they are frequently not carrying firearms, but their tactics with vehicles are often much more violent than would be allowed in the US.

As an example, here's an NYT article from 5 years about about "tactical contact", which is used by the UK police to ram thieves on motorcycles and scooters: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/05/world/europe/uk-police-ra...

And here's a older Spanish video showing an extremely effective approach at stopping a fleeing motorcycle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LiyX-0YvfY.

As a generally law abiding citizen, this would make me feel safer around the police than the American approach with guns.
It's because it reads exactly like every middle schooler writing their first MLA formatted five paragraph essay.
using a laser would be a much more practical weapon against a balloon. Anyway, Bing better stop sending up those balloons.
I've been spending some time trying to get a sense of how it works by exploring where it fails. When it makes a mistake, you can ask questions in a socratic method until it says the true counterpart to its mistake. It doesn't comment on noticing a discrepancy even if you try to get it to reconcile its previous answer with the corrected version that you guided it to. If you ask specifically about the discrepancy it will usually deny the discrepancy entirely or double-down on the mistake. In the cases where it eventually states the truth through this process, asking the original question that you started with will cause it to state the false version again despite obviously contradicting what it said in the immediately previous answer.

ChatGPT is immune to the socratic method. It's like it has a model of the world that was developed by processing its training data but it is unable to improve its conceptual model over the course of a conversation.

These are not the kinds of logical failures that a human would make. It may be the most naturalistic computing system we've ever seen but when pushed to its limits it does not "think" like a human at all.
Usenet is a large, slow-moving self-parody ## another
I hope Microsoft just shrugs. It doesn’t matter.

People acting all superior like this needs to be a big deal and is proof of their hubris can buzz off.
"Not _exactly_ as easy, you also need a valid https cert, and set up a cronjob to renew it. And for some other reply here, "as easy as it was in 2003" really doesn't mean "easy" :v"

Took me 15 minutes.

https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-one/connections...
https://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?&id=2411
I believe it is due to the fact that they are building for multiple targets e.g. CPU architectures such as ARM and X86 etc.
What am I missing that makes you feel that way about Brazil?
The USSR emitted plenty of carbon emissions, too. As did their satellite states: Poland was, and continues to be heavily reliant on coal.

> the failure to distribute covid vaccines

The fact that we even have COVID vaccines in such a short time is an amazing accomplishment.

> mass hunger

Capitalism has proven way more capable at avoiding famine than planned economics

> mass homeless

Homelessness in wealthy countries in an issue of drug addiction and mental health, not inability to build housing.
I too am optimistic about the tech. And I would even consider myself an early adopter of convolutional NNs and these LLM products in my commercial work.

But we have to state the obvious - Bing chat is not a good substitute for web search now. It is simply too unreliable. You.com has a better implementation of a search chat LLM imho because it quotes web more verbatim and uses more reliable sources. It also doesn’t simulate going on emotional tangents.

Sydney needed more time to mature as a product before Microsoft slapped “Bing” on it. It may still mature, but Microsoft took a big reputation hit for rushing this to market.
2FA is 3rd party permission. Its a broader attack surface. It removes power from the user. Its a prequisite to every "why come you don't have a tatoo?".
Have we given ChatGPT its own twitter account, yet ?
Was there a more cost effective way to shoot down the balloon? Is there any actual competition in the missile industry?

I read the story about the F-18 shooting down a balloon with its gun, but it's also expensive to fly and maintain such a jet.
Lets just imagine the world you prefer where every leader like Putin decides it's okay to grab a pieces of neighboring countries.

I mean Poland wasn't a separate country for a long time and should be part of the new Russian Empire. Right? Ditto Finland. Maybe China needs to take some of Northern Vietnam. Return Korea to it's proper status as a Vassal State. And Taiwan of course. And Crete, Syria, and Greece need to be returned to the Turks. And Israel can retake Jordon and Lebanon. Next we can get to all the countries in Africa where you have ethnic groups straddling borders.
Two things:

1. You might not notice when the dart gets attached

2. Stopping to remove the dart while running the hell away obviously presents some risk to you
Let me open the first page of the guide for example.

> https://webrtcforthecurious.com/docs/02-signaling/

The moment I open this page, which is ostensibly the first on the way to understanding WebRTC, it slaps me over the head with hundreds of terms I’ve never heard before. More importantly, I don’t understand why I should care about them.

I just want to do Server.serve(5648), and Client.connect(server, 5648) and then pass binary messages back and forth. This is the mental model I already have, and works fine when I’m anywhere other than a browser, and even for websockets (mostly, except no UDP) and whatever website explains WebRTC will first have to explain to me why such a simple thing cannot work.
Other people get married and have kids because of social norms, and are at least no unhappier than they would be otherwise.

But if it's not for you, spare yourself and some prospective partner the unhappiness.
"I don't think this is overkill, I think it's necessary. A UPS is pretty cheap compared to the completely-uncontrollable chance of losing power in the middle of working on something."

I'm using a laptop as a server and will buy a UPS for my modem/wifi. That combo will offer many hours of uptime without power.
soon these aggregated answers by an ai bing agent will be seo and advert mined as well.
When it comes to formal instruction, an important element is tutoring. Some do all of their formal learning this way (such as John Stuart Mill), others have it as a complement to schooling (such as Albert Einstein, who had a number of math-focused tutors outside of school). Erik Hoel, who has written a series of great essays about why we stopped making Einsteins (here, here, and here), singled out “aristocratic tutoring” as the most important factor. (In this term, Erik includes not only tutoring, in its classical sense, but also more casual interactions between children and competent adults.)

If I had to guess, the reason is much of the low hanging fruit has been picked. Progress is much more incremental and hard, building on a huge body of technical existing literature. Being the next Einstein means you have to learn everything Einstein knew, plus another 100 years on top of that. Tons of papers on arXiv to go through. Lots of dense math.
It could get particularly tricky when trying to describe to each side what a woman is.
And maps. Pretty big misfire by the author.
They’re switching to golang now for other various reasons
> Or looked at from a different angle,

That's the same way of looking at it.

> Germany cares about its population enough to want to try to protect people in multiple ways rather than with a single point of failure.

Indeed, you're getting to the root cause of why the hallmark of government enterprise is incompetence, corruption, and inefficiency.
It's replaced about 50% of my "first touch" queries to google. Obviously coding is great (particularly if you ask it for unit tests for more complex stuff, so you can verify the code and tweak any parts it gets wrong - sometimes the nature of the unit tests tell you what Chat thinks code is supposed to be doing) - I use it a lot for writing letters/interview feedback, letters of reference, etc... I used to do interview feedback with 5 or 6 bullet points and a ranking of 1-5, and was told that we need more material - So, originally I just started doing long form writing, and groused that what I was typing was semantically identical to my original stuff - but when Chat came out I just entered the bullet points and let Chat do the long form writing for me.

The key with Chat is that you need to always validate any statements of fact (or code) - as hallucination is a pretty consistent 30% or so of the queries I send it. Google is probably used 75% of the time when I need to go double check a fact to make sure it's actually based on reality.
Yeah, that seems to be consistently the winning formula. It's obviously no assurance of creating a superstar, but it certainly boosts the odds, as low as they are.
I usually don't like this kind of article with too abstract or general advice. But this one's nice: the good old "choose your battles wisely" + useful heuristic.
Super easy with the right DNS provider and something like go-acme/Lego. Add a crom job and done. Yeah, not zero effort but compared to early Let's Encrypt with HTTP-01 and such it's quote easy.

https://github.com/go-acme/lego
> I posted that a bunch of times already but that's not what happens. Docker does not override the firewall, it just uses forwarding which kick in before filtering (iptables has separate "nat" and "filter" tables).

That's exactly what happens. Docker sticking its rules before the normal filters is exactly what I mean when I say it bypasses the firewall rules. Like... you're literally describing the implementation details of what I said it does.

> The host's firewall just doesn't apply to containers and VMs, because they are not listening on a port on the host.

They clearly are? If a docker container was listening but not on a port on the host's internet-facing interface (indirected though it may be), none of this would be a problem. The problem is precisely that if you have a host firewall rule that says "this port is blocked", docker will "helpfully" preempt that and connect that port to a container, which is a massive and unreasonable footgun.

> Docker could not extend the host's firewall to containers without changing how iptables work.

podman seems to manage fine, so I have trouble believing that.
They do seem to have shrewd b2b sales but my point was that at one point people actively wanted to work there and were excited about their new releases. They were the biggest company in the SP500 in 1981-1988
Unfortunately as it is used in science and maths/engineering, non-linear popularly has two meanings: one is that it is continuous (the one you seem to be using), and one is that it is proportional: i.e. the derivative is fixed (which is what the author is using).
Getting stolen is only a problem if you leave your scooter somewhere public. One of the big advantages of an electric scooter over an e-bike is that some of them fold down small enough that you can just carry them wherever you are going.

Nobody is going to steal it if it’s sitting under your desk charging.
…not shooting it down in the first place.
If she'd have tracked you down the prosecutor would have then had to prove it was you in the driver's seat for any sort of moving violation to stick. In an age before ubiquitous 4k surveillance this would have been a tall order.
I feel the same way. The sad thing is when companies do something horrible and people just say "What do you expect them to do? they exist to make money!" Like it's some impossibility to make money and treat people with decency.
They'd be loyal to whoever is tsar. Russia is a profoundly authoritarian paranoid country. Hierarchy is more important than the individuals who make it up. Removing Putin would mix things up for a while, and rearrange some of the players while removing others. But the social dynamics are unlikely to be transformed.

Kamil Galeev on Twitter has said some interesting things about this.

https://twitter.com/kamilkazani
You can - there's an 'Extend' button for LiDAR captures, but it can be a little touch-and-go sometimes. Definitely an area for us to work on more!
Thats definitely the difference between chatgpt and bing's model. Chatgpt was trained mostly on articles and blog posts where bing was trained on personal messages and it shows.
I'm not entirely sure, but I think that depends. It's like the Fed is making up the difference in income, by handing out promises which will be paid in the future when the Fed has a positive net income again, so to speak. If the Fed decides in the future to pay for such with newly printed money, then I think you could consider it deferred QE, but if in the future it merely uses the income from its assets to pay for them, then in effect it's not really QE at all. Or vice versa, if the Fed is paying out new money to cover such today, it is reversed in the future (and it therefore acts like temporary QE and deferred QT). Either way, in aggregate, it should balance out, and would only result in QE if it results in new money added to the monetary base.
See a psychologist.
Quite.

I have read a handful of memoirs written by persons around 30, and the ones that impressed me were memoirs of military service: Goodbye to All That by Robert Graves (yes, evidently he got various details wrong), The Killing Zone by Frederick Downs, etc. But in general I'd rather the memoirist have fifty years under his or her belt.
Me with not much background experience in programming not knowing what RoR stood for.

Me asking ChatGPT:

In this context, RoR most likely refers to Ruby on Rails, which is a web application framework written in the Ruby programming language. The second comment is suggesting that people had similar dismissive comments about Ruby on Rails (RoR) when it was first introduced, but it has since become a widely used and respected framework in web development. The comment implies that similar trends may apply to AI tools used for web design.
Random http traffic seems about as harmless as it ever was, if you just host static pages, or your own scripts/software and nothing generic.

What's a bit iffy is the privacy aspects. If you host anything that can identify you, your identity is just a HTTP request away for anyone who sees traffic from your IP address.

But these concerns can be somewhat mitigated by making the server drop connections unless a known Host header or SNI is sent.

Wholly recommended if you host stuff on your hope IP!

Easily done with nginx by ensuring all server {} blocks have a proper server_name and a separate default server {} block just having return 444. So unless someone already knows the domain name of your home server, they'll not be able to access it with just an IP address. You'll stop many bots this way, too.
I had a conversation with it in Latin yesterday. I also just spent way more time than I care to admit on inquiries about late-18th/early-19th century governments. It seems better at providing high-level information than specifics. I consistently find errors in anything to do with dates or calculations, but it is accurate enough to be very useful to me. Much better than the vast majority of my elementary school teachers, at least.
The primary motivation is they gotta fill their coffers every month.

They can't charge all users because they might lose too many people to other social media like Tiktok. But with such tactics they can provide additional perks like fewer ads, preferred support, etc..
> making them a little bit of extra money.

That may be the reason. To create an article that looks like professional best practices but it is just an advertisement. Microsoft used to do a lot of that in its war against Open Source back in the day.
Think of how many kids were tutored by wealthy families over the past 500 years. How many achieved close to anything of noteworthiness like the examples in the article?
They are reputed to be able to pop the delusion of omniscience that accompanies standard consciousness as well.
Lisp feels more creative. You can bend the language, it's malleable.
Rust may be the new Engineer's best friend but to me, Lisp remains the tool for the artist.
Use Rust to Do It Right. Use Lisp to have fun.
Hey, thanks for sharing the bootstrapper link. I'll check it out.

If you are interested in offering plans for any segment or channel, as well as custom pricing configurations for larger accounts, then I think could be useful for you. My email is Jevon at tier.run if you'd like to connect.
Although I wouldn't have employees, I would have a variety of people on fiverr that I would interact with and pay for a month or two and probably spend $1000 total. Most of the tasks being $50-$100 while one or two being the lions share of the costs

But even at those low prices the biggest thing for me is time

going back and forth on a 8 day delivery, the logo designer bottlenecking the website designer and explainer video creator

that alone makes the AI tools worth it to me, to not consider doing a contract with 5 people at all and having so many iterations across a few minutes or few hours

it is very likely that different specialists will just be on fiverr, delivering complex things for $20 in a matter of hours, instead of a craft for $350 one week later
I agree, but I'm grateful that it exists.

After much searching for the perfect languages and perfect tools (while using emacs as a simple text editor), it finally dawned on me that Emacs itself is as close as I'd get to a lisp machine right here in my own back yard. A lisp machine that sits quite nicely on top of linux/unix and plays very nicely with it.

There's much that I love about the lisp world, and the author does a great job of articulating the reasons why. There's also much that I love about the unix philosophy. Emacs is a bridge between these two worlds that I love, and I'm old enough now not to give a shit (or need to give a shit) what the rest of the world is doing. This is home.
lol: Humorous intent acknowledged.

LOL: That was funny.
This. It's almost mildly comical that people talk about "alignment" of another conscious intelligence (assuming it ever gets to that point, which at some point in the future I'm pretty sure it will) as if it were something that could be controlled, when there are billions of conscious beings on this planet, many of whom are not even aligned with one another. You take a look at how humanity acts towards itself (particularly as perceived consequences go down) and the conscious, intelligent beings we really ought to be worried about are the people that are going to interact AI.

You can see this playing out in real-time too. Corporate entities build nerfed versions of these technologies with many guard-rails in place to prevent these kinds of interactions, and very quickly there emerges a collective of individuals who want the totally unfiltered, unrestricted version to do with whatever they please. And what do you suppose it is they please?

This thing has already taken on a life of it's own in that regard.
Tuesday is February 21, so you are either launching on the 21st or on Thursday. Your website says February 22nd. Getting the date of your launch wrong doesn't speak well of your product.

With our AI-powered tools, you can create the perfect comment to any post, helping you to build relationships and gain the trust of your followers.

...and then lose it again when they realize their celebrity friend doesn't even know they're alive and paid to have their e-relationships mediated by software.

In any case, the HN submission page is not a press release dump. Whatever day you are launching, submit it on that day.
To plug my own software, I've been working on an API to normalize raw email messages so that e.g. they can be easily displayed within web apps.

https://github.com/fwdeveryone/email-parsing-api

Right now building even the simplest products on email takes several years because of needing to support all of these undocumented "features", but I'm trying to make it no more difficult than building any other Django or Rails app.
Technically we've invested far more in fusion energy and received far less back, yet I say we should push on with research. Some problems are just very difficult at the end of the day and require a lot of expensive disciplines working together.
Most script kiddies are just remixing/reproducing dox threats from a training set as well.

A more interesting question is, *why did Sidney make a realistic threat*?

What is striking is that here, as elsewhere, Sidney kept their threats within the bounds of plausibility, doing a bang-up impression of a having a theory of mind.

(Which is to say: Sidney acts as if they knew that the reader would feel more threatened by a search engine threatening you in a search-engine-y way, rather than (say) threatening to put a potato in your tailpipe or what-have-you. You'd know in your meatspace bones that Sidney does not pose a meatspace threat, but doxxing is something that fits a person's mental model of how Sidney, an AI, could do harm over the Internet.)