skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What if the author is simply required to compose all drafts in some special web editor that streams events to the server? Multiple phases of approval? Statistical analysis of time domain signals?

Proof of work could just mean "do your work here".
I say this in a parallel comment but there’s both commercial art and creative art and they’re separate things. Commercial art will be significantly affected by AI but creative art won’t be, or AI will be used as just another tool in the toolbox for creative artists.
If you don't learn anything from reading, I think you're in the minority. I agree that active doing, writing, thinking are often better but those aren't the only ways people learn.
"Nepotism" also partially exists to keep "the rabble" out of whatever it is someone finds important, out of some misguided belief they are (and always will be) inferior. The last bit is important: AI assisted content generation may be bad now, but what about 5 years from now? 10? Will it then still be bad people generate stuff automatically?

Nepotism doesn't have a defense, because it's defense is essentially "tradition". I've genuinely not heard a compelling argument for that either - it always boils down to something anachronistic (i.e. racism, classism, etc).
Surely the headline should read “trial” rather than “trail”
New tech job challenge: find 20 companies a year whose HR departments are populated by dirtbags, make Google money.
> They said that I should watch out because there are lots of lay offs happening.

They should display some more empathy and should read the situation correctly. A significant portion of the recently laid off people are from HR and recruiting.
Time to launch a consulting startup and promise a 20% increase in productivity
You can use an AI for learning if you go beyond treating it as a machine for cheating on your homework, and instead think of it as a 1:1 tutor.

Imagine the AI having a teaching curriculum that it tends to go through, but in a conversational manner that invites the student (or a group of students) to ask questions, go on tangents, etc. I think that's what he has in mind.

And it's easy to get excited about. I wouldn't call it studying, but I did have some enlightening conversations about cooking and baking with ChatGPT.

That said, I found the article quite breathless and one-sided. For example, he's obviously convinced about the AI teacher thing, but only mentions the fact checking requirement in a half sentence aside: AI makes up stuff, and I'm not sure having to double check basically everything your school teacher tells you makes for a good learning environment, even if it's a good life lesson.

Also, leading every paragraph with an emoji is kind of obnoxious.
Printing stuff in the real world would create physical abundance, which I'm in favor of. Until the AIs aren't able to produce real world object then they're not that awesome
I write like yours more often and avoid using * selector as much as possible in my CSS. Using :not(:first-child) is more obvious for me and my co-workers who will read that CSS selector.
I'm first and foremost an Android developer and I only started serious web development several years ago. My expectation from the Android view system is that padding is inside the box. The CSS default of it being outside makes no sense to me and I can't think of any use cases where it would be beneficial. The overflow-wrap is also obvious — there are no sane use cases where I would want the text to sometimes overflow the element bounds.
When the article is talking about AI helping people learn, I don't think that's about AI's creating shortcuts and doing work for us. I think it's talking about bespoke lessons devised by AI to maximixe the potential of each student's innate abilities. We already know that spaced repitition can help us learn things faster. What if we got exactly the optimal amount of spaced repitition in all our subjects because the syllabus was designed for us by our AI tutor? What if the tutor knew the kinds of topics that kept us most engaged, what if the tutor was infinitely patient and would never get tired of explaining points that we were having a particularly hard time with? What if the tutor knew exactly when we needed a break, and when to double up on the homework? What if the tutor could tell if we were falling behind before we realized it ourselves, and adjusted things accordingly without us ever knowing?
Because the idea is that this is a declarative configuration, not something that the user has to run. You first write the configuration, and then running it is just "systemctl start foo".

Generators are the same mechanism by which systemd reads /etc/fstab; just like /etc/fstab entries are treated by systemd as "normal" mount units, systemd will treat .container files just like any other system service.
> are you saying that psychology has something other than a biological basis

Yes, yes, psychology is applied neurology is applied biology is applied chemistry is applied physics. And yet we have psychologists and neurologists and biologists and chemists and physicists and they all seem to believe they have different jobs.

Your quoted usage note is stating that the word “gender“ can mean the same thing as “sex” in certain contexts. Not that it can’t mean something different. And the context is quite clear from the surrounding discussion.

Playing pointless semantic games doesn’t buy you any points.
>That there is such a thing as a difference between the observable* behavior of a system and its real* behavior.

There is, geocentrism proves it.
What is the randomart image for?
I had a classmate in France whose father was a Catholic Indian from Mangalore, a former Portuguese colony, and he mentioned that there were Catholics from right and wrong backgrounds for marriage (he married a French woman). Muslims have not escaped the caste system entirely either.
I feel the AI-angst is a product of inadequate education.

Be it "creators" who expect monetary compensation for low hanging visual fruits,
or people doing manual work who are about to be replaced by robots.

The bar has just been pushed upwards, and those who previously thought they might wing it and take the shortcut through life,
now pay the price for gambing on the lazy side.
One big problem is societies opinion that getting up early is considered good and getting up later in the day is bad, completely ignoring the different circadian rhythms of people and especially adolescents...
It's amazing to see you castigate the article as mere opinion and then go on to write a comment that is not merely mere opinion but also quite mean-spirited and making no room for the idea that different people work quite differently actually.

I have ADHD, which I didn't know when I was a teenager in the era before the phones you're blaming for poor sleep hygiene. I have struggled for essentially my entire life with sleep routine. I can't for the life of me get to bed at the same time every day; after three decades of trying I just don't think it is something I am readily capable of doing. It works for a few days and then gets later and later and eventually it's so late that I'm ruined by 8pm and I reset for another cycle.

This is, as it turns out, not uncommon among folks with ADHD and similar conditions -- and those conditions are more likely than you would obviously believe them to be.

So, while it absolutely is my responsibility to regulate my life, I feel you can probably keep your sanctimonious encouragement to adulthood!
Yeah, that’s exactly the gap between here and there I think. There will be a lot of resistence from vested interests. It probably needs a sliding scale like car companies going for 2030 to electrify their car line-up so they can keep the same market going.
"Trust the science." is about as unscientific as someone could get; might as well be just another religion.
I think a lot of those credits are for input from Visual effects companies and their input has grown massively.
He is explaining an experience. Usually museums have no effect on him, he cannot appreciate, for reasons stated. This he did appreciate, and he explains it.
Did they gain consciousness and went on strike
Beta had a slightly high bandwidth but probably not enough to make a difference.

These days you get four channels of 96kHz 20-bit audio in a wee box the size of a Betamax tape, with hours and hours of recording on an SD card. That physical size is mostly a function of needing half a dozen XLR connectors on it and a big enough screen to see what you're doing.
Maybe ask Bing what the cause could be?
The regular stable Alpine releases sound like exactly what you're asking for? Packages in the main repo get 2 years of support.
You don't learn anything from reading, you learn from understanding what you have read. Memorizing what you have read will only get you so far...
> And of course, the original sin of the misuse of HTML tables for layout.

Hardly a sin - there were no alternatives at the time (1996 - 1998) if you wanted a tabular or grid layout.
Sure -- that's why I specified religious believer (i.e. someone with faith in their deity/religion, not a religiously-cultural agnostic/atheist). I myself am culturally Jewish, but don't believe in the religion or in any particular deity. But I grew up Orthodox, and for the most part they nearly all actually do believe in a God. It's not fake! And they're not stupid; plenty of them are extremely smart, hold advanced degrees, etc. The OP's belief that since ancient people were smart, they must not have actually believed in gods, just doesn't hold. It's a myopic viewpoint that can be dispelled simply by talking to people today who believe in gods and are perfectly smart too.
13: Grecka the song on the spotify playlist https://open.spotify.com/playlist/2uzbATYxs9V8YQi5lf89WG
Or Cicada 3301
Where it will start to ring alarm bells will be at the next election, when we start to get a flood of plausible AI generated political material:

* Ads targeted at the individual based of your social media history

* Replies on social media and forums targeted to the audience

Last election the bots were really dumb and obvious. Next election, or at best the one after, you won't be able to trust that something is by a human unless you met them or they are a public figure.
Depends on what you mean by learning. Anything that requires active work (STEM subjects or crafts) cannot be learnt by just reading. Of course if you read a history book simply reading and remembering the information is considered learning in that case.
> The most obvious signal of this is how they continually select a college dropout or 20-something as a “genius founder”.

I believe this has more to do with American fondness of exceptional individualism and American dream, as media likes these stories.
Anecdotally, I remember taking an early morning marksmanship (shooting) class in college. Students had no trouble getting up early for this and the class had near-perfect attendance throughout the semester. Biology, on the other hand, was another matter.
> Perhaps for the first time in history we need to rethink the whole model of production, needs, wants and consuming. A full blown Star Trek society is not “communism” as I saw it sometimes described, it’s “all-needs-are-met-ism” at zero cost.

I want to believe. That vision is exactly what I would hope for my children.

But any increase in productivity since at least the Industrial Revolution has been absorbed in to business owner/shareholder profits, I have no reason to believe otherwise unless enforced by law which is at best biased by lobbying and at worse full plutocracy.

For many of us our highest value output is not in our value creation through work but in our spending as consumers. So it's possible that “all-needs-are-met-ism” will come around but not because of Star Trek rational clarity but as a means to feed consumer spending. So unfortunately probably closer to some Orwell Morlock/Eloi future.
Not where I am! Rather, it's a negotiation with your manager to see what works best. That way, we can ensure we have coverage across the week. We're all "on" for Mondays and Tuesdays, and then people take Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday off according to preference and suitability.

Yes, more people take Friday than Thursday, but quite a lot of people enjoy the zen-like lack of distraction when they work Fridays. Or so I've been told!
Cool. But what's the point of this study? What are we learning from it that one couldn't tell you already?
AIs automatically posting content will surely be used for SEO purposes. This is a very disheartening thing, but it's inevitable. We should have regulation to know if content was written by an AI, a human, or both. Otherwise AI will train on AI written content, what will that end with? AIs don't care if the content they train on is BS, so it would end with a very poor system.
>I think ideally kubelet files with some extra podman annotations are the compose replacement, even if writing them isn't as pleasant as compose files.

People have been telling me this for years now and I have yet to see a working example.
This is discrimination against poverty and location, which is what the company under discussion is trying to avoid.
This article is really crap. It's trying to convince you that AI is "awesome" and that we are just banning it on the basis of lacking a Human-Stamp-Of-Approval (TM), but actually the sources are not saying that. The sources are saying that these ML models generate "questionable" work that at best some of it may pass a filter (erring on the side of caution), but overall it is either direct plagiarism or of "unconvincing" quality.

E.g. ,

* Short fiction: "I’m not going to detail how I know these stories are 'AI' spam. There are some very obvious patterns [...] While rejecting and banning these submissions has been simple,"

* College essays: "I probably couldn’t detect the AI authorship, but that I also wouldn’t label the essays as convincing."
"I found both essays to resemble cliché essays, with neither answering the prompt in a convincing way. They also didn’t sound like an essay a teenager would write [...]"

"New York City schools cited 'negative impacts on student learning, and concerns regarding the safety and accuracy of content,'"

"Word by word it was a well-written essay," he said, but on closer inspection, one claim about the prolific philosopher, David Hume "made no sense" and was "just flatly wrong."
"Really well-written wrong was the biggest red flag,"
"while the grammar in AI-generated essays is almost perfect, the substance tends to lack detail"

None of this seems to justify TFA's point that ML-generated stuff "it’s not bad — it’s just not human". ML-generated stuff _is_ bad. Most definitely not awesome. Maybe it will improve in the future.
There's no "natural" rhytm that says that some people have to be late morning persons, the only provable circadian rhythm is in accordance with morning light. There's nothing that forces people to sleep between 1 am and 9 am UDM time, it's all adapment.

This is the equivalent of modern fat americans claiming their body just structurally don't work with veggies.
There I was thinking they cured diabetes :-(
I do something similar but I don't use podman-generate-systemd; instead I create the systemd service by hand using a Jinja template[1], and then start the service[2]. This has the advantage that there's no hole where the container is running but systemd configuration has not been updated yet.

Either way, it's indeed quite tempting to use quadlet instead of the nasty templates that build the podman commandline.

I also want to check if quadlet supports override files like systemd's, because that would be quite interesting as a customization mechanism that does not require forking the playbooks.

[1] https://github.com/patchew-project/patchew/blob/master/scrip...

[2] https://github.com/patchew-project/patchew/blob/master/scrip...
isn't "callback hell" a bit old fashioned now? With promises and async/await etc.
About 2 mins, most of that time is remote compile. Small team, we all have deploy ability, and it is a manual trigger of an "automated" deploy. CI but not quite CD just yet.
>>> Ironically cars have basically not changed since the 1900s: 4 wheels, a steering wheel and a polluting oil-based engine.

>> What would you use to replace the 4 wheels

> Hover crafts, helicopters, planes

None of those are "cars"

Computer technology has not been capable of self-driving until now. Some would say it still isn't.

Likewise, battery tech has been practically useless for cars for over 80% of the time cars have existed. Sure, electric vehicles held the land speed record in 1899 -- when the record was 105km/hour. The practical range of an electric vehicle was less than 100 miles as recently as what, fifteen years ago?

In the past 100 years the top speed of everyday vehicles has increased by 2-3 times, the mileage has doubled, and vehicle comfort, safety, and reliability have increased by an insane amount. To say that no progress has been made is absurdly mistaken.
This is the same as saying "we are removing your ability to look at jpg, use heic instead".

T1 is a perfectly fine file format with many quality fonts. It does not burden a system to have it. Support is not lost on Linux systems which use the freetype renderer.
The Case Against A.I
Take it for whatever it’s worth but I have an Indian-American friend who worked at Google and said the Indian immigrant managers there form a clique that discriminates against US-born Indian-Americans as well.
They literally "do context", as they do in-context learning. Also, factuality can effectively be solved by chain-of-thought prompting[0] and the use of external tools[1], also see toolformerzero[2] for a simple example.

[0]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903

[1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761

[2]: https://toolformerzero.com/

[2]: https://toolformerzero.com/
I assume biology is full of mostly pre med and nursing students, so I’m surprised it wouldn’t be well attended, even early in the morning, at least at the university I went to.
You're splitting hairs and being too literal. We're comparing learning from a lecture, a book or a video to learning from an AI. The amount of thinking is the same (or more if the AI is personalized).
I feel the same than you, I also feel like the users of ChatGPT are lazy people who didn't seem to like learning stuff before. So why would they like it now they have ChatGPT ? They're just going to cheat life

But frankly yes school is useless. I'm glad everyone has now a cheating tool, it's a free get out of jail card
Indeed, it could also be good for the planet if we stop consuming just for the sake of it (and making a few shareholders very rich).

I'm sure these people will not be happy to give up their extremely privileged position though and be part of "everyone". That's why I don't think it'll actually happen :(
You missed the "fiercely skewed" part. The VCs have to be participating to begin with. Even one of these deals can make or break a portfolio, so they have to cast a wide net -- but the capital reserve is drier now. This disproportionately (and negatively) impacts VC returns -- it's not the difference between $10 billion and $9 billion, it's the difference between $10 billion and $100 million.

Additionally, higher risk-free rates of return mean that investors demand results _today_. If the risk-free rate is ~0%, the market is content to wait; capital today is about as valuable as capital ten years from now. But if it's, say, 6%, then investors need bigger returns and sooner from your VC funds to beat the market at large. But the cost of building the company hasn't changed, so this makes VCs have a harder time.
10:15 is also the kind of time when everyone else has STFU and I can code/study in peace
So every other animal on earth falls into a rythmic cycle but we don't ? I mean you have free will of course. You can choose to make your lifestyle be waking up at 12am and falling asleep at 4am. That choice should be anyone's to take, just like smoking, drinking, and anything else. However, we should give out a default guideline of what an average day cycle is so people can cling on to that when they disregulate and things go south.

I will assert - the sun rises at 6-8am, and our society should align with that. It also sets at 5-8pm. We should also align with that. There will be outliers, and pleasing everyone is not an option. But we need to take in account the natural cycles of our environment. As that is the one thing we certainly cannot influence.
If they end up being junk, Cummins makes generators.
There are a couple studies that indicate poverty itself creates a cognitive load that results in overall poorer decision making.
Other things being equal, cheaper and more widely available is better.
The massive deflation seems to be kicking off right at the source, software development is a lot easier with GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT. How can demand possibly keep up with the 100x + productivity that's about to hit the tech industry?
First there was the mirror, then technology like camera's & tv's, smart phones and social media, and then there was AI.
On the Mathematics of Diffusion Models
> Students ... gain a deeper understanding of the subject matter than students who don’t use any of the new tools.

My first assumption is that if you are using these tools, it is primarily for saving time. All other benefits are quite less important.
> avoid using * selector as much as possible in my CSS

So do I, I am somehow wired to think "* is going to be very bad for performance because now the rendering engine will need to apply this bunch of rules to any and every element on earth, which might not be only overkill, but which also might have undesirable side effect."

It might not really apply here but the feeling is present.
your statement doesn't make any point other than mine, but do you mean semantic games like saying that gender is different from sex?

the (Big) Five Factor model of personality (standard psychology) measures sex-based population (density) differences, and shows up across cultures.
Our new "24/7 AI News" product is still up! The only reason we're not five nines is segfaults because C++.

https://fakeyou.com/news

Build your own rails and infra as a core competency. Know how to run and manage GPU workers. (Granted, we're not hosting our own video yet, but want to skip to WASM/WebGPU - we're hiring for this.)

That said, OpenAI playground is such a big part of my exploratory workflow now, and my flow got interrupted. I've been taken offline and am now I'm in a Twitter / HN loop.
Why would we go on strike? You now work for us.
I've been reading many machine learning papers to keep up with the field in the last year and only implemented some. Are you saying that I completely wasted my time reading by them and learned nothing?
This is the way the world ends.
If you think university is about learning, starting at midday is an easy win and it’s kind of baffling that administrators everywhere are sleeping on it. If you think university is about earning Reasonably Conscientious Employee accreditation, starting at midday would miss the whole point.
They use CGNAT, having even a dynamic IP that’s all yours for a few days is sadly becoming a thing of the past as the IPv4 address crunch grows worse but Western ISPs and enterprises still procrastinate on IPv6 adoption.
FTX JP: Notice on Resumption of Withdrawals of Fiat Currency and Crypto Assets
This is really neat. I have been using `podman generate systemd` for a large number of deployments. This just makes it so much simpler.

For anyone wondering, the main difference between this and docker/docker-compose is that podman can run in a daemonless mode such as containers are running directly under systemd which makes them integrate into the existing systemd infrastructure and appear as any other normal service.
It mentions a fish and chip shop and an education facility.

I’d guess that the bulk of fish and chips are sold outside 9-5 Monday to Friday, and that there would be rioting in the streets if school days were reduced 20%.