skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
this is very shallow criticism.

I benefit from invention of a car because I can buy a car and be it's owner and only benefactor

You cannot buy and own ChatGPT as invididual, you will never even be able to inslect its source code.

A car is patent protected. Patents allow me personally to build a car for my personal use. Copyright doesn't allow that.

Patents last 20 years, copyright lasts close to 100, depending on jurisdiction.

The only reason corporations can make insane profits from this tech is because we granted this category of IP insane priviliges and government is spending tax dollars to protect their IP.

Make code like patents - it must be published in a register accessibke by anyone, and loses protections after 20 years.

If you don't register it, then the government will not be prosecuting anyone for using it.

Suddenly the benefits will be shared
> you still need to analyze its output and understand all this shit

And the person who does that will earn more. But they will be expected to produce at a rate that a human, working unassisted, cannot today. And those who would have assisted today will not have a niche anymore.
Updating the copyright date attribution is a marketing tactic to covey freshness of content. Same with the publication date and any dates mentioned in title or content that are not hardcoded to a specific factual event.
Thanks! Even this still defines noise only in terms of 'interference', and then takes a bit of digging to infer that it's something to do with timing and interrupts, and so it's probably jitter in execution time rather than referring to RF interference or electrical noise. I'm no kernel hacker but I've spent a lot of time close to the hardware and I've never heard jitter referred to as 'noise'.
I worked for a small webshop in the mid-aughts and every January we’d get a slurry of tickets to update the year in the footers of a couple hundred websites we developed/hosted.

I asked why we didn’t just do “Copyright <?= date('Y') ?>” and I got a spiel from the owner about how only sites paying for ongoing maintenance get their date updated.

Seemed really silly to me, more than a few sites I built may have ended up with “automated ongoing footer maintenance” for free.
Touchscreens have ruined car UX for a generation.
But efficient scaling counts too right?
Yes, though "CYA" isn't necessarily entirely fair either. The legal system isn't exactly entirely deterministic, particularly if there is a jury involved, so I think the tendency towards conservatism and seeking every edge isn't entirely unreasonable. Cost does certainly have to be weighed against any measures, and particularly for technical issues costs may often not be obvious to lawyers themselves or managers. But after actually experiencing all the stress and costs of a legal case just a few times, and only as a peripheral player, I can understand worries around all of it.

Also to the root's line here:

>I gave multiple examples of other code bases at Microsoft and Google and other big companies that dont include the year at all in some cases and definitely dont update every year.

This is one of those things where it seems reasonable at first blush but then completely not on second look. There are lots of cases in tech where "look these huge players do this" makes sense, but when it comes to either scaling or law things are different. Here I'd be looking for examples of small players doing that, because the big players have such powerful law teams and deep pockets that risks they'd dismiss as unimportant might be existence-threatening to a small company.
I am curious, who has the copyright of chatGPT output from its conversation with the user?
RDNA2 is a beast, low TDP and great perf, i bought the RX 6600 XT (from ebay ~250) for my VM PCI passthrough needs (gaming) and it never go over 50°C, it's quite impressive!

It's even better than the newest Intel GPUs (except maybe for raytracing, but that's a thing for 'tomorrow')
> But when you first experience redness, your knowledge of the world is exactly the same as it was when you were still Monochrome Mary.

That is still false though, because in that moment Mary realizes what redness looks like. She has mapped a sense experience to a concept, which is new knowledge. The author has to prove that this mapping exercise is indeed not new knowledge, as making a connection between two disparate events (acquisition of concept vs acquisition of experience) is considered net new knowledge based on the epistemical definition of knowledge.
Tbh, if I could put the framework's AMD motherboard in my T470, that'd be amazing. I love the thinkpad keyboard, I enjoy the X1E glass touchpad, the T14 Gen2 screen is amazing, my battery life is 13h of work in IDEA, and I got all of it combined for less than 600$.

But I really dislike the hardware of the framework :/
Basically: won't anyone think of the horse shoe makers?
I can't help thinking that most of these examples of negative side effects are related to intensives rather than meditation/mindfulness itself. There's a world of difference between 20 minutes a day and 10 days in a retreat looking inward. Maybe it's just better for you in short bursts, not long marathons. I once experienced negative effects after joining a Buddhist meditation group while at university. Every time I faced anything which provoked anxiety, such as preparation for my final exams, I would turn to meditation assuming it would help me get things done but it had the opposite effect of avoiding what I needed to face. I ended-up spending longer and longer periods meditating but I felt I was getting weaker both physically and neurologically. Eventually, during the end-of-term holiday break, I consulted a doctor who gave me tranquillisers for a few weeks and I left the Buddhist group when I returned to university but it took a while to get back to normal.

These days I do 20 minutes a day of mind control which involves nothing more than counting down from 9 to 1 repeatedly. No quest for Enlightenment. Just a sense of calm I can depend on balanced by facing stress and, most important, some kind of short-burst physical activity such as 3 sets of full squats to bring me right back into my body in no uncertain terms. Works wonders. It's all about balance. 10-day mindfulness retreats full of 2-hour sessions, in my view, are for zealots.
You’re right; I think these are the actual ones[1]. My intuition is that a human is equally unlikely to be fooled by these stop sign modifications, although the curve warning sign might fool someone at night.

[1]: https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a15340148/researchers-find...
FlexGen can already run GPT-3 size models on commodity hardware, albeit with high latency and fairly slow throughput (order of 1 token/s).
Tell HN: Microsoft Teams no longer supports pasting Markdown links
Microsoft Teams has had a subset of Markdown implemented for a while (although it wasn't a completely conformant implementation; single asterisks around text like this produces bold text instead of italics, while _underscores_ do produce italics). However, I have discovered, to my deep disappointment, that Teams no longer will properly handle Markdown links.

EDIT: I just realized that this only applies to copy-pasted links. This is really bad, though: Most people only copy-paste URLs; typing a URL by hand is uncommon. Anyway, back to past me:

I don't know if any Microsoft Teams developers lurk here, but if you do, could you please try to get Markdown support back to Commonmark compliance? I'd love to get a truly compliant Markdown entry, even if it was hidden behind a setting. At the very least though, links should be fixed.
Maybe not impossible, but if it was easy or if the gp didn't have a point, wouldn't we have figured out what fibromyalgia is by now? Also maybe we would have given more scrutiny to the widespread marketing and distribution of oxycotin in the U.S., at least enough to prevent the disaster it caused?
I've found individual years and year-ranges useful as an indication on when the code was first/last/how often updated.
I thought most sites had the copyright year dynamically set to the current one, though I also kinda half recall someone saying that wasn't good practice either.
Appears to be a response to Biden visiting the Ukraine, which Russia was given advanced notice of per this article on the logistics of Biden’s trip:

- https://news.yahoo.com/sneaking-president-dc-kyiv-without-15...

Treaty‘s Wikipedia page is here:

- https://wikipedia.org/wiki/New_START
Potassium bromate is a bit of an oddity, in that the FDA discourages its use, and likely wouldn't approve it if it came up today. The EU regulator is, I think it's fair to say, considerably more aggressive in purging the lists of already-approved things.
How about "shooting" the seeds at some velocity into the ground so they are embedded a few mm into the top soil?
Oh absolutely, that’s why the very idea is interesting and even philosophically vital to put out there. Most people can’t shift there minds and culturally are stuck in a certain “this is how it was and should be.” (Conservatism) and “this is what we believe is possible” (Progressive)

We are in either one camp or another. And yes my comment is aimed at rethinking what we can be or should be.

And if the end of shortage also means less suffering and more decent living for the worlds poorest, yeah, that is totally awesome^2.
Does the copyright string have any legal significance at all? I always thought copyright emerged from the act of creating a work, not the act of writing a "©" somewhere.

I thought the attribution line was basically a public reminder or declaration that you own the copyright the thing it's written on, but not the source of the copyright itself.
The Scarlett letter approach is tempting as it seems effective on the surface. As a high school reader of Hawthorne, I was taught that the second order effects were worse than the benefit gained.

That being said, I think that it’s hard to devise punishments that let the transgressor continue to function in society. You can’t put the blacksmith in jail or they can’t work. And finding people with limited means is extra cruel or ineffective.

I wonder if some version of this schandmaske can apply to social media where you want to have some formal notice and punishment but don’t want to cut them off from their livelihood or connection to social relationships.

Although I doubt that our society can agree on transgressions that would warrant the mask. Saying someone is ugly is a big deal to some people and less so to others.
If they are talking about jitter they should call it jitter. Noise is something completely different. The RT folks will just shake their heads.
Interesting, this is the first time I've heard compliance as a reason -- can you elaborate? Is Oracle Java somehow FIPS or ISO certified but not OpenJDK? Thx.
How was I implying that the FDA should apply to Europe?
We'll see if they understand, when valuations need to start being adjusted on the books...

I'm skeptical if someone understands steamrollers if they choose to stand in front of one.

Time, will tell.
By thinking this way - I gained 30 lbs, developed a little drinking habit, and stopped bathing .. wife stopped giving me the "social" attention, and I withered socially. HOWEVER, I got a 6-figure job, an MBA, a Master's in Physics, and a hell of a lot smarter. That took 4 years to do, but took 4 years off the end of my life, I'm sure.

In the long run though, the >adversity< experience that is the human condition trains us to be hard. I'm not talking about body wise, but in fortitude. We weren't meant to be given everything on a silver platter, yet here we are in modern society.

You don't have to go all "liver king" on this one, but recognizing that a healthy dose of day-walker ain't so bad. I returned to the day-walker realm about 3 months ago and have since dropped 20 of the 30, drink about 1x a month (best I can tell that trend will continue) and I actually give a sh*t.

I don't want to say this is wrong, but its a cautionary tale about taking the uphill battles as a challenge to sharpen you for the time you really meet adversity.
The problem with synthetic intelligence usage is that, if used like a crutch, it will necessarily modify how you walk. And if you could develop walking just fine and interject this, are you going to be a great walker?

What would be the next generation's intelligence strong at?

Biology needs a soft quote of regular stress to develop compensating the needed optimizations. Happens with muscle growth, fat burning and developing psychological traits and behavioral transformations.

What will be our new opportunities for growth if all the hard work is going to be done by synthetics? (with a hardware to run that is as expensive as a high category car)
Probably... also parts of team was moved to other teams, other leave company (Google). I'm not sure who was still in on AMP team.

But main feature of AMP was "Top Stories" in SERP. In 2021 they (Google) make this also for non-AMP sites:
https://searchengineland.com/google-top-stories-carousel-now...

Also starting from iOS 15 users can't see AMP on result pages. If iOS was 14 - they can be seen.
https://searchengineland.com/amp-links-in-google-search-brea...

But other parts of AMP was going good - AMPAds and AMPEmail.
I realize that, and I’m happy to give estimates. It’s when they expect me to estimate something that fits in the schedule they’ve already decided on that it gets iffy.
The whole point of a laptop is that I can use it on my lap, on public transit. That's not possible with your recommendation.
Pick a different 4 days like they do for weekends.
In the reductive view, yes. But at some point one must also consider the entire ecosystem. Plants are very efficient in keeping the entire system running; fossil fuels are quite efficient in making it less hospitable to humans. That consideration goes beyond just talking about energy input or output per volume or mass (although in the end it cannot and should not divorce itself from those considerations lest it turns into pseudo-science like the many, many inane techno-scams are prone to do).
We keep it updated with the current year not for legal purposes, but because it gives users the perception of being current/relevant.
> The fundamental purpose of mindfulness practice in Buddhism is to convince yourself that your sense of selfhood is false. Because we are so strongly attached to the sense of selfhood, achieving that conviction is going to be a wrench.

I found quite a few signs of egotism in the writer, so I'm not surprised that he experienced a great wrench in confronting his sense of selfhood. And then lashes out at the teachings and practices he had previously rushed to embrace.
I see a lot of negativity on this post, I just wanted to say, "way to go!". Building and finally launching is an amazing achievement on its own.
You're confusing the words "true" and "real". It is true that the Earth revolves around the Sun, and the orbit is also real. That 2+2=4 is true, but it's not real. The electrochemical activity in your brain is real, and the fact that it causes your subjective experience is true. Your subjective experience is true to you (you're experiencing the things you're experiencing), but it's unknown to me. It is also of unknown realness, i.e. of unknown correlation with reality. You can see things that are not real and not see things that are real, or feel things for no reason (e.g. intense fear not because there's something frightening, but because there's a drug in your body).
Accidental Wittgenstein :)
You originally said that:

> podman creators do not give a damn about how their binary should be run on different linux distros

Just to play the devil's advocate here, maybe I missed something so I'll try and be verbose and start from the beginning: Podman is developed by Red Hat, and they have chosen to build for, and support RHEL (and implicitly derivatives thereof). There are no "supported" binaries available for $DISTRO because Red Hat has decided not to spend money on supporting, developing and testing for that specific distribution.

Podman is licensed under Apache 2.0 which means that it would be possible for anyone (for example Canonical, who are "responsible" for Ubuntu, or volunteers) to build and test the code for their distribution.

Doesn't it follow then that the responsibility for making Podman available on Ubuntu falls on either Canonical or volunteers that use Ubuntu, and not Red Hat? Otherwise, you could blame any developer on any software for not making their code available on any distro, and perhaps even any OS.

Makedeb is the Debian variant of AUR[1], which allows users to (more) easily compile software that they want but is not available in "regular" repos, so it could be a way to run a newer version of podman on Debian. I haven't tried it, but I believe the idea of these "handheld compilations" is to include the things you express worries about, like dependencies.

I read the links you provided, and "baude" (maintainer) stated sort of what I said above:

> we rely on community support for distributions support

lsm5 said:

> issues are best reported at Ubuntu's official bug tracker

While I can understand the frustration, or disagreeing with the decision, regarding the fact that podman is not equally available for Ubuntu (or any other distro), I don't really agree that the Podman developers themselves (or RH) are more responsible for this than say Canonical or the users themselves.

[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/
I'm more worried about the internet itself, as soon as this technology is accessible to bots, we would no longer be able to distinguish if we're chatting or reading an article by a real human or an AI.

Same goes for comments here on HN, any one of which could be generated by ChatGPT..
It is such a bad implementation.

Whenever I am in a car with a touch screen the two things that get me

- The car bounces and I miss the thing on the screen I was aiming for

- I am low vision I have to lean in so close to read those stupid screens with the tiny UI widgets

I hope they figure something better out, I honestly preferred when they were doing the screens with the buttons around the edge.
Is it based on the book?
I think that all (even beyond the phone allowed here) is too extreme, but yes, allowing our brains' precious attention to be stolen for other people's ends (which I extend to crappy TV, etc, too), is a shame!
OR join the military and learn to sleep on-demand anywhere at any time while being able to stay awake through the most boring lectures.

It's a great and amazing skill.

I'm not sure it is worth the learning experience.
Good catch, thank you! Updated
Perhaps this style of interview will be a great antidote to the elitecode arms war hellscape we accidentally created.
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I'm going to repeat a comment I made a few times before, as I think it's relevant:

In one of the talks at Google I/O a few years ago a VP from Audi (or Volvo?) spoke in a thick and lofty German accent about how "ve haf completely oferhauled ze driver exzperienze". He played a sexy video clip showcasing their new Android infotainment system (something like https://youtu.be/h_7_fKJ0PNs), and the first thing I noticed is how they'd taken away my traditional temperature knobs and replaced them with digital touchscreen ones. They looked just like physical ones, and were in the exact same place you would expect (https://9to5google.com/2017/05/15/android-cars-audi/). So, I've gained absolutely nothing, and now I have to take my eyes off the road and look down at the stupid console just to change the temperature.

TLDR: Tacticle feedback is a Good Thing(tm) and designers should cultivate - not fight - muscle memory.
I'm not convinced you understood the comment you replied to, which doesn't suggest placing a public park in somebody's yard. It suggests that people are clinging to their yard when they could instead have a housing option which doesn't have a private dedicated yard, but does have a much larger and nicer public park nearby which serves that need for green space.

And honestly, if a person wants to make a little public park in their yard... I don't see what the issue is with that? But yeah, that's not what was suggested in the slightest.
Here’s a thing I realized about climate controls that is NOT intuitive - it is not about the temperature/humidity in the car or room! That’s only an accident - it’s about how the person/people feel.

So the older cars work closer to that because they basically have the options “blow hot/cold air on me” instead of “try to maintain this temperature”.

I can be quite comfortable in a wide range of temperatures if I can get a blast of cold or hot air “on demand”.
Why *is* Bing so reckless?
> I have an unreasonable amount of anger for how much a16z put into Adam Neumann's Flow.

Why so angry? I'm interested in the idea behind flow because it is nontraditional in the American building sense. If I understand the idea, I think providing community is a really good one. There is a lot of loneliness and we know that when seniors move into senior housing they love it. Most young adults love college dorms. So why not have that for everyone else? You do have to contrast this with the "projects" which also tried to develop community but failed I guess, maybe because economic opportunities were not included.

Is Flow based on the idea of a Kibbutz?
Optimizing Haskell Code for Runtime Verification
It should be noted that Daniel Ingram is following the Mahasi sayadaw method and is a bit from of a fringe Buddhist subculture promoting (if I am not confusing things „dry insight“ meditation).

Maybe the cultivation of the non-dry aspects is actually helpful.
Not sure about other countries, but the US also made this worse by encouraging people to use housing as an investment and retirement vehicle, so you have a lot of people who really don't want housing to get cheaper because it means their retirement savings or investment will be worth less.
Funny, because we count having Databricks on your CV as a red flag.
The precision is probably worse, actually. You're paying for brand cachet, not good engineering. In any case, no mechanical watch will outperform a 1$ qwartz movement.
So? That might make it hard for you and me to figure these things out in daily life, but psychology as field of science has been trying to study the mind rigorously for at least a century by now, and it's not exactly naive about this problem.
In house counsel’s first priority is to not have a fuck up attributable to them.

Faced with the certainty that a bunch of developers have to do something with zero perceived risk to counsel, or that there is a 0.01% chance that some negative thing would impact them someday maybe, their choice will be to avoid answering the question or status quo.
Is there a single case in all of legal history where someone has lost a copyright because of failure to update the copyright year?

If not, then you don't need to do it.
Not any more. It used to be true in the US that the copyright declaration has to include the claimant and the year, and that not inducing one or both forfeited your copyright. This hasn't been true for decades and since then copyright is automatic and implicit.

Now it's basically just a textual version of Big Brother eyes warning you that someone cares about this thing and reminding you that copyright still exists before your Ctrl-C into your own website.
Explaining to ChatGPT what to produce will still be a bottleneck.
According to the Migration Policy Institute, in 2019, approximately 30% of the population had arrived in the country within the past 10 years.

Considering the green card wait has increased 400% in the past 2 years, it’s safe to assume this number is dramatically higher now.