skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I believe this to be true because in the usa they really are media companies, aka Comcast, and I don't have this problem in other countries where I lived where ISPs were ISPs and nothing else. They delivered internet and maybe also phone.

In Taiwan I get 1gbps down, no caps, and a bunch of weird networky config stuff I don't quite understand but apparently you don't get in the usa, for like 30 usd/month. It's awesome.

Plus I'm torrenting basically 24/7 and my isp just doesn't give a fuck. When I did that in the usa Comcast sent me an email for every single torrent lol. My download is in the tens of terabytes a month and uploads are at least a terabyte a month. ISP doesn't care. Love it.
> The way it can synthesize sources and simulates reasoning, is unprecedented, compared to keyword search.

Simulating reasoning is only an impressive trick if you are accurate.

ELIZA "simulated reasoning" - but it's just a pattern matcher. Now this bot completes sentences based on sentences that other people have emitted in the past.

> get a coherent cited response

It would much more interesting if it were an accurate response.
"Modern Java" is not formally defined, but most people seem to associate it with Java for Microservices (small runtimes instead of ancient Java EE), functional programming, streams, reactive programming and generally using newer (Java 8+) language constructs.

There's a lot more to it than obsessing over a single line of boilerplate code...
> Strategy needs to be tuneable*

Yes yes yes!
Someone should design a modern replacement ethernet interface.
I'm probably missing some of the nuances, but I'm referring generally to the Equivalence Principle, described by Einstein as:

> we ... assume the complete physical equivalence of a gravitational field and a corresponding acceleration of the reference system
So, if the people rise up in rebellion against a believe system, like sovjet-socialism and the defenders of that believe system thus decide to decline those people - or even regions agency over there own destiny. Does that make those defenders of the believe system pseudo-scientific, because they fail to update there heuristic models?
I'm curious how a plasmid that provide resistance would come to be, given there's no known evolutionary pressure towards it.

Could you elaborate on how you think such a thing might appear in nature?
> Also, a web-app is in general a better user experience when compared to a desktop app, in this scenario. Because it is easier for the user to launch and use.

Embed an icon to your software, pin to taskbar or the system tray. User clicks icon -> large, non-minimizable popup window appears, gets users attention -> 'generate report?' -> Yes or No button.

Much better than having the user type some URL. They'll remember the icon but not the URL. Two mouse clicks, no keyboard needed.
You can be paying a mortgage on a house worth 100,000 dollars, have a dead-end job, live paycheck to paycheck, with no more than 1000 dollars in savings, and still count as a net-worth millionaire.
This is a discussion from 2005.

By now it’s become pretty clear that it’s not possible to preemptively defend against this. There are a bazillion gTLDs and on large social media sites display names are not unique.
Some services requires that you video chat with them and your ID. Would be harder to do unless you have a powerful gptvideo.
The way I see it marginalism gives us some numbers, but given some constraints. For example, you can't be sending kids down your mine. The market then gives you an alternative figure for the price of diamonds. The question then is what constraints are reasonable. That whole discussion is a debate about our values in another sense.

About consultants (the MBB/B4 kind), all I can really say is that they tend to confess on their own that they don't provide much value. Everyone I know in the profession seems to say so. They find it utterly baffling that 23 year olds can be rented out at about 6x their salary to do presentations to managers with decades of experience. They often tell you that they are simply rubber stamping some internal decision with some nice slides, and that the slides have no real insights.

There doesn't have to be a contradiction either, it may well be that these guys are scarce like diamonds, but also like diamonds, they aren't really valuable in another sense.
Large-scale immediate query-ability.
Because it's entertaining. It's more entertaining to me than reading most of Shakespeare.

I imagine that if you gave the choice to a person to watch what you described or to read Shakespeare then the vast majority would choose to watch the eggs.
Misleading title, as at the point(s) of the crash it seems to have disintegrated ?
Why do you think there's no evolutionary pressure towards it?
What you described is as close as possible to product strategy and not engineering strategy.
Idk about DC, but XBOX Linux with the 128MB modded XBOX and ZRAM would still be pretty usable as a desktop with IceWM, ROX, Dillo, MPlayer and Siag Office/Magic Point/MuPDF.
Not having 2FA at all is the least secure option. SMS-based MFA is better than no MFA, and, to be honest, I'm not sure I trust most people to keep track of MFA tokens and apps. Heck, I don't even fully trust myself to keep track of my yubikeys.
Keycloak and multi tenancy using single Realm
Instead of setting up multiple realms or multiple client registrations, you can make use of a single realm and a single client registration and still easily support multi tenancy using Keycloak.
The tow-boot software devs goes out of the way to say they are offering a boring PC boot loader experience so I wouldn’t expect any advanced features other than booting from devices.
It really does seem like a natural extension of the Unix maxim of "everything is a file"; I can imagine a modern browser embedded in a Plan 9 or Inferno style OS implementing a "tab as a file" style semantic.
Yeah under capitalism that’s sometimes true. Otherwise, Cuba has great doctors and great medicine for example. A lot of America’s competition is BS. Companies behaving like cartels is more common.
Speaking of Watson, how well does ChatGPT perform at Jeopardy?
One way to think about it is that the model needs to essentially encode the entirety of human knowledge. If you can do it with just 175b parameters then it looks quite efficient to me. GPT-3 is about 400gb in size which would even fit in some modern IPhones! Another metric to consider is that there are about 100 trillion connections in the human brain. If you roughly equate brain connection to a model parameter then GPT-3 would be only 0.175% size of human brain.
This saying was bullshit to begin with. The user is a product also, whether they pay or not. One example is cable television. The fees are huge, and there are lots of adverts.

I think that at the end of the day, the natural order is that every entity is trying to maximize the goodness it can get, be that businesses, people, governments, churches, or any other. This is exacerbated with the fact that often it's a competition. If you don't do the level of shady shit that others are doing, you get less goodness, or even fade into irrelevance. Which is why good regulation, and culture matters a lot. Entities are powerless against systemic issues like this, the only way is to change the playing field itself.
Twitter seems like a perfectly reasonable venue to hear EA, computer game company behind Madden 2023, announce that they're working on Madden 2024.

I don't need that information to pass via Bob Woodward for a hard-hitting journalistic enquiry into the truth of the claim.
So if I leave Facebook, they will allow others to claim they are me? The only way to protect is to actually have an there account and pay Meta? I mean - are they serious?
> So now that I'm on a forum with smart people, the kind I didn't have access to back in high school... has there been any progress towards something like this at all? Are there any directions for this? Or is there a conceptual reason I'm missing why this fundamentally isn't possible, why the sum of all possible paths is the only way to account for certain behaviors?

It certainly not the only way. One easy trick: you put it under multiple layers of definition, and at the lowest layer you just do the integral without calling anything "paths" or so. (Equivalent theories can be seen as bastardization of each other, that's why none of them says anything meaningful about ontology.)
VRAM RAID!
Karl Mannheim
I once had an IP address connected to an SGI Irix machine (v 6.5!) pass a security audit because the tool automatically scanning it couldn't identify what the hell it was, why none of the standard SSH key exchange algorithms were accepted, and concluded it was likely a honeypot automatically.
You could look into whether good-enough approximations exist?

Especially if the moving entities in your game aren't supposed to be omniscient. They could gradually learn about what good enough paths are.
Shuddl
Access future unused freight space and ship LTL perfectly.

Shuddl. connects shippers to the nearest available freight space on demand.
ChatGPT on Probability
My move from the US, to London, to Manchester's tech-scene
If I was a business I'd immediately pay for this, because the distinction will inspire confidence. Easy as that.
The Captive Creator Code
But no more immune to zero days
I suspect the regulatory compliance is not easy to meet for their business.
If you're queue should truly be (not heading toward) empty with the goal of minimizing latency, then you don't need a queue at all. You need more processors.
ROS 2 Humble is the latest LTS of the Robot Operating System (ROS), the de facto framework for robot application development. Yocto and ROS 2 allow you to build custom Linux-based production-grade operating systems for robots that obtain best performance for your use case. This article provides a walkthrough on how to build a Linux operating system with ROS 2 Humble for the NVIDIA Jetson Nano board and showcase our contribution to the ROS 2 community bringing ROS 2 Humble support for Yocto Honister release. Lastly, we show how to get better performance with ROS 2 Humble using ROBOTCORE hardware acceleration framework for ROS.
>Our reality may be a sum of all possible realities

OTOH I would say there's a number of possible realities that never did add up.

Some of the actual realities also.
I'm trying but I can't think of an example that affects me personally. I'd say that if the SaaS isn't making this data easily accessible to you in whatever format you want, it's a shitty service and you shouldn't use it.
You must not confuse yourself with whatever coating they put on the thing. It's rent extraction, built on the already established power that is Facebook, and the preconceptions people have when they recognize the branding (Facebook, and the verified check mark). The rest is irrelevant.
Run wathever on sd card on its most basic thing. Run lxc and mount storage on /var/lib/lxc.

Well… at least its what I’ve wish I could say.

Truth is I’m using manjaro (arch based) on a similar board and then one day after an upgrade they just decided to migrate from eth0 to the current naming scheme based on nic driver. Had to plug in a monitor and keyboard to fix the situation. Home stuff so its all good in my case.
A texture helper which brings a high level API to handle RGBA data for Flutter
Kaczyński: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Two_Who_Stole_the_Moon
Yes, that's a big part of what's holding the evolution of C++.
The UK also used the extremely heavy hammer of retroactive legislation against some benefits recipients who were made to work without pay: https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2014/07/08/retrospective-legis...
The cost of cables and receptacles is quite a bit lower for Micro USB Type-B connectors and these microcontroller products have tens-of-cents (or maybe even less) in price sensitivity.

The RPI4 has far less sensitivity and USB OTG, so it uses USB Type-C.
It's not about verification, it's about customer support.

Verification could be provided for free with ID cards or something like this.
I think showing with static analysis that existing C code is safe is very hard.

But if you start with modern and cleanly written C and avoid certain techniques (such as type punning) I think it is clear that this can work. Rust fundamentally does nothing else.
OK, I think I appreciate the issue: “multiverse” is overloaded. When people talk about the many worlds of quantum mechanics, or alternate histories, they’re talking about the terms in the path integral sum.

But multiverse can also mean, separately, at least two additional things. First, different bubble universes that may be a part of cosmology. Second, alternate quantum field theories (with different actions, or fundamental parameters, or different gauge groups, or whatever).

The standard quantum-mechanical path integral is a sum over histories / a many-world theory in the sense that the different histories / parts of the wave function can be detected via interference experiments. Other meanings of multiverse are speculative (though maybe a cosmologist will come and tell me that bubble universes are a direct prediction of inflationary cosmology and are not optional either).
Why would you need Oracle JDK specifically? There are so many reliable JDK builds by other parties. https://sdkman.io/jdks

I'm personally using Amazon Corretto (is in the SKDMan link)
Some companies stick to ANSI-C and use a compiler binary from the 90s because new things are scary™. So what exactly does that tell us?
For pine stuff I had more issues with hardware than software. So in the end you’d still have to babysit a bit even if using fedora hat enterprise serious edition.
business idea: an extension that uses image and text recognition to pre-load sites and tell the user if the will encounter "x"!
And yet, I see twenty Lime bikes in London for every Boris bike I see. Docked bikes are not a popular business model, not even when heavily subsidised.
That's what the article says.

If they're too different, they cancel out.
Man, I wish the Chinese were better at publishing their results! We just get two low resolution images and there isn't even a title of the article this was supposedly published in :(

I tried scanning through the issues from this year of "Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy" but nothing looked like it was an actual FAST result paper (only one mentioned FAST in the title, and that was an instrumentation paper).

Funny to see that "Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy" is actually an English language Springer publication, as the title makes it sound like something they'd put out locally.
> Similarly, the bare metal solution consisting of nginx with manual Let’s Encrypt cert setup was too much of a hassle.

It's not a hassle. Setup once and then forget about it. It's dead simple, easy and there's a million tutorials on it online.

But it's boring (this is where I'm going to old-man-ramble about things, so better stop reading now). Imo, that's why we have so much bloat, complexity and overkill use of containerization that requires orchestration in software and devops. We don't go the easiest possible route, but the one that seems interesting and most fun.

I totally get playing with new stuff and going totally over board just to host a static html file for a personal project, with the goal to learn something new.
But it's not just personal projects, it's whole companies that adopt this kind of approach, not even thinking 2 years ahead, when the "cool new software" you used is now not only not cool and new anymore, but abandoned and unmaintained.

I get that this is just a random "i did a thing" blog post, but this just annoys me :(
No they are not.
Have you ever served in a military unit?
PSA: Having a will is not just if you are old. Every one should have one and if your affairs are straight forward you may be able to it yourself with a kit.
I think that most people, including leads, they do see the benefits, but they think the cons heavily outweighting the pros.

Without having a certain number of key developers pushing the transition it's hard to make this jump.

I would also say that this kind of transition can be had progressively, I myself know a person who pushed a company into a fully-typed static pure functional programming a team that started their whole business in php. Gradually moved them into typed functional php and then into Haskell. He was lucky enough that the team/company was small enough for that at a bigger scale this would've been much more difficult.

In other places I've seen the transition happen (into the functional typescript ecosystem which is a sweet spot imho) it has been mostly the CTO pushing for it.
what holds back aviation is surely lack of Pythonics!
Imagine facebook charging for a "secured" account and users just ditching the toxic nonesense.
I wonder if putting an adversary network on top would reduce the flickering. A mechanism that only accepts a frame of it is detected to be three next frame in a video of the same person, otherwise regenerate
Nice, I didn't know about https://wg21.link/P2216 .
See author's comment to you, below; they aimed wrong in their reply.
If you want a boost for DOS' compatibility under Windows XP, borrow the NTVDM DLL from ReactOS to perfectly play, for instance, Monkey Island.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230218232640/https://www.washi...
Ah apologies - I missed that subtlety. Unfortunately the whole 'could care less' debacle has left me somewhat triggerable.

'cares not so much' / 'doesn't care so much' might also work in your context.
I don't think there is any "one size fits all" approach to MVP's. Keeping in mind that the exact boundaries that define both "minimum" and "viable" can vary based on the context, there's a pretty wide range of outputs that can be an MVP. I'm pretty sure that somewhere, out there, somehow has used an MVP that used no code whatsoever, but rather just UI mockups, a powerpoint deck, etc.

Keep in mind what the goal of an MVP is: it's a tool to help you validate (or invalidate) a hypothesis. What hypothesis? That depends. On you, your idea, what stage you're at with the idea, yadda yadda. If you're trying to validate a hypothesis like "There is at least some interest in a product like X in the general sense" (for whatever your X is) then maybe UI mockups and/or a pitch deck are all you need. If the hypothesis is "if we build Z, then people will pay Q dollars a month to use such a site" then maybe you need a working product, which just doesn't have every bell and whistle you might eventually add, but which fundamentally captures the core of the idea.

And so on.

That said, for the products I work on, if there's a backend element and I need to code it, I am almost certainly going to be using either Groovy or Java for most things. If I'm using Groovy that generally implies that I'm using Grails for a web app and if I'm using straight Java then that probably implies using Spring Boot for a standalone service of some sort.
Apparently, undercutting (and other forms of predatory pricing) is not a market problem.

To reiterate, they're pricing out other artists, and undercutting artwork (such as, commission work) prices, not just the price/cost of generated output (which services can also undercut/predatorily price between their own kind, going as low as 'free' - 'but you'll have to pay us extra for priority/compute/features/whatever').

An artist might be offering commissions for, say, $10. Someone on fiver might do something for $5.
An app comes in, and offers you a package of 20 "commissions" for $2. See how that undercuts artists? It's frowned upon even within artist/trade circles when artists do that sort of thing (as overt lowering of prices can affect everybody else in the market), let alone when a random non-entity comes into the market to disrupt it (and that is the intent, when such services specifically advertise their 'art-making' ability), and does so while operating on your own unlicensed (stolen) artwork.
This shouldn't be an issue unless you are attempting to have the bit field span across your type boundary. Bit fields by definition are constituents of a type. It doesn't restrict you from putting the bits where you want them but how you accomplish that. In this case, you'd either have to split the value across the boundary into two fields or use a combination of struct/unions to create an aliased bit field using a misaligned type (architecture permitting of course). You either sacrifice some convenience (split value) or some readability (union) but it is still reasonable.

The compiler itself is not taking a liberal approach to bit field management, it is only working within the restriction of the type (I am speaking for GCC here, I can't vouch for others). But if you think of them as an interface to store packed binary data freely without limitations I can understand why they seem frustrating. They are much more intuitive when you consider them as being restricted to the type.
The main mistake with the Sega CD was adding a bunch of expensive new hardware to it. It gave the Genesis a second, faster Motorola 68k and a special ASIC to handle sprite scaling and rotation effects (to compete with the SNES), but these inclusions effectively doubled the price of the add-on and were seldom used by developers. The Turbo-Grafx CD, on the other hand, just added a CD-ROM drive to the Turbo and cost half as much. The Turbo CD was also much more necessary since the console used HuCards that were much more limited in space than the cartridge ROMs used by the Genesis.

That said, the Sega CD was reasonably successful for what it was, and I don't think it contributed much to Sega's downfall (if anything, it helped Sega foster an impression with customers of being on the cutting edge of things back then). Far more egregious were the 32X, since it confused customers about the company's direction after the Genesis and was abandoned so quickly, and the Saturn's architecture being so much more expensive and complicated than the PlayStation, especially for 3D games. The cost let Sony undercut them because they knew Sega couldn't match them without losing money on each console, and the complexity was such a hurdle that even Sega's first-party developers had trouble figuring it out (they had to release "do-over" ports of Virtua Fighter and Daytona USA because the first versions were so rushed and buggy). Sega of America also pulled the plug on the Saturn way too early (because of Bernie Stolar's infamous interview where he said the console wasn't the company's future, which caused third parties to immediately cancel their releases for it), which left the company with basically no presence in their biggest market for about two years.
These free tier offers will kill you on the bandwidth costs.
I have a hard time understanding what's going on here.

Isn't that just some sort of static analysis?
It's pretty hard to put yourself in the shoes of someone running a company that's steadily losing relevance, but personally I'd double down on the esoteric shit like CSS-Tricks, and then rebrand, as opposed to chopping off limbs and becoming even more B2B-ish and inaccessible to the next startup looking for a cloud service. What is their moat? Widen whatever they have. Jettisoning the most popular property sure seems like a preliminary to the executives cashing out.
This kind of thing made way more sense back when computing hardware used to be expensive, so it was sensible to repurpose absolutely anything you might have around. Today even something as cheap and potato-sized as a Raspberry Pi Zero will run circles around any Dreamcast-era hardware, and waste a lot less energy in the process.