skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"They" implies multiple, and you are starting the sentence with a singular "the person", and finish the sentence with singular "him". Just stop playing stupid grammar games.
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34849710 and marked it off topic.
There are three I just cannot get rid off it seems: WhatsApp, Youtube (incl. Youtube Music) and HN. And Youtube is becoming such a pain lately, with all those crap channel recommendations and whatnot, that I am sometimes considering subscribing outside of Youtube, e.g. Patreon or so, to the one or two channels I regularly whatch. Which would leave Youtube Music and Whatsapp, both of which are just too convinient for the time being...
One (or more) less service(s) to give your e-mail. If you want to see usage you can just check the page loads instead of having to add analytics because github pages doesn't share any stats. The visitors get the same benefits because it's one less site behind cloudflare. The big providers can't figure out (and possibly sell) your interests based on the sites you host.

Not my reason to self host (static) but more a welcome side effect.
The PM gave an interview a few days ago on local TV.
MSVC supports C11 and C17, minus the C99 stuff that was made optional in C11.

Anyway given the option, one should always favour C++ over C, if they care about secure code, which while not perfect it is much better than any C compiler will do.
Human emotions have never changed throughout history, the reaction will always be the same.

Technology simply changes the medium, but the end result remains the same. Transformative AI falls into the category of technology.
I just leave it running all the time and it launches a new window basically instantly lol
Well it depends on what you mean by "quite a bit of work"! Wick rotate, focus on a finite volume of spacetime, and discretize the spacetime. That's all. The first step changes a difficult-to-sample distribution exp( i S ) into an easy-to-sample exp( – S ). The other two steps keep you from needing infinite RAM.

The discretization and finite-volume approximations may be removed by doing calculations with different spacings and volumes and extrapolating. The Wick rotation is more subtle, and typically means only some observables are accessible. To study the path integral with real time causes a very difficult sign problem [essentially: you need an exponentially large number of samples in order to get cancellations under control], which is why real-time quantum dynamics is an exciting potential application of quantum computers.
First, UFW only exposes a small subset of iptables functionality through its UI, if you want anything else you'll have to add it manually, which is error-prone. And UFW can't (or couldn't, when I last looked at it) read config from multiple files, which makes it really hard to build up configuration declaratively & separate concerns. When deploying using Ansible you want to be able to add rules for different services independently, which is easy using Ferm as that reads config files from a directory, but very difficult using UFW.

Also, disabling UFW by accident can happen quite easily, if you e.g. remove your systems' Python version (to install a new one) it will uninstall UFW as well, opening up all ports & chains in the process. On a desktop system that might be OK, but it's just not acceptable for a server system IMHO. Hence the first thing I do in any Ansible base role is to remove UFW and install Ferm.

Ferm isn't perfect either but it has much better support for most iptables functionality and the way it builds up and applies rules makes it way more suited to a production environment.
Never said that! I said that I've never seen great products built by micromanaged teams!
There’s an aspect of path integrals that’s always bugged me. They rely on an underlying classical field configuration space to integrate over. But, this seems problematic to me, since properly the objects of classical physics should emerge as limits of quantum physics. Shouldn’t we be able to start with “pure” quantum mechanics (a state space, a Hamiltonian operator), with no mention even of “paths” and get out classical physics? I.e. it seems backward to speak of a particle trying out different paths since a “path” is a classical notion; it’s as though quantum mechanics is merely a superstructure on top of an underlying classical layer rather than the other way around. Know what I mean?
Schmalz is also beautiful in traditional Jewish dumplings or kneidlach.
Not one guy, the guy who run it and was acquired with it, therefore a shutdown lurks in the future.
I am not isolated - I have a great social life; I just don't need work to be social as well.
I just include them, everything works as before. If I have to create a library then I create a separate header file for the api functions and only the internals are headerless.
The issue here is that the state with the most motive (Ukraine) is one that most are agreed did not have the opportunity to actually conduct the attack. Nobody else has a strong motive. The US had already achieved what it could have hoped to achieve months before the pipeline explosion. Russia's plausible motive assumes a certain amount of strategic insanity mixed with thuggery. Everybody else's motive more or less rests on making a political statement that they haven't been making in public.
I don’t buy that truly intrinsic motivation exists. If anything I think the display of intrinsic motivation is an external performance more than anything.

If everyone a person cared about was taken away, I can’t convince myself that they’ll still have the motivation to perform the same way they did before
What makes CloudKit easier to implement these features? Why not a local db like sqlite?
That is a spin which leaves out the moralising I think.

This is a newspaper quote:
"A senior Ukrainian presidential aide has reacted with anger after Elon Musk’s SpaceX said it had taken steps to prevent its Starlink satellite communications service from controlling drones, which are critical to Kyiv’s forces in fighting off the Russian invasion."

'Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX’s chief operating officer, said at a conference in the US that the surprise decision had been taken because it had never been the
company’s intention to allow Starlink to be used “for offensive purposes”. '

That's quite an interesting claim as I wonder what one would expect from people fighting desperately to save their country. It was at the least going to be used for command and control.

'Shotwell said Starlink was “never, never meant to be weaponised” by Ukraine, although it cannot come as a surprise to the company as Kyiv’s military has been using it to pilot drones for months. “Ukrainians have leveraged it in ways that were unintentional and not part of any agreement,” she added.'

'She said SpaceX was able to take measures to curb Ukraine’s use of the technology to pilot drones, although it was not immediately clear what those were and whether Kyiv’s military could work around them.'

'The row is not the first between Ukraine and Musk. Last October, Musk asked Twitter users to vote on a poll for Russia-Ukraine peace that included Ukraine handing over Crimea and allowing UN-supervised referendums on whether Moscow could keep other land it had occupied after its unprovoked invasion.'

I think it's reasonable to say that Starlink is far from the ideal solution now and you can also see why it's going to be essential for there to be competitors no matter what the economics are - perhaps national ones with only local coverage. Why would anyone build any reliance on a system which is controlled from afar and suddenly becomes unreliable when it's needed the most?
Yes, what you posted counts as rude and personal by local standards and we ban accounts that do that repeatedly, so please don't do it again.

Re "twisting of people's comments" - that's your interpretation based on your priors. People make these judgments all the time—in fact they come up in nearly every argument as soon as emotions get activated. You're overestimating what moderation can do if you think we should impose our own such interpretations. And they wouldn't agree with your interpretations in any case (how could they?) so you wouldn't get what you wanted even if we did. No one would! In fact it would amplify the complaints about moderation by many orders of magnitude.

If someone is wrong or you think they are, the helpful thing to do is respectfully provide correct information. If you can't or don't want to do that, please just chalk it up to someone being wrong on the internet and walk away. The one who stops posting first in tit-for-tat exchanges is the one who wins anyway.

Also, HN conversations are basically never good once people start arguing about what each other is really saying, so when things take that turn, it's a sign that it's time to stop.
Safety critical software has laws it needs to follow. Testing and validation can be so expensive it doesn't make sense to touch old code.

I'm an advocate of Rust for most software, mind you. The safety you get from enforcing ownership at function and crate boundaries is allowing the package ecosystem to grow rapidly at a high quality. The safety win partially mitigates the safety loss you get from adopting hundreds of small transitive dependencies maintained by random people on the internet. But if you've spend tens of thousands of dollars having engineers test and validate some piece of safety critical code, you're going to need a really good business case for touching it at all.
Not quite a hostage scenario when it comes to a commodity like processors. Funnily enough, AWS had bought the company behind Graviton, Annapurna Labs.
It is by far not just the Azov batallion.. you just don't have a clue to what is going on, and of course your state and your supposedly objective media have no intention of helping you to find out.
> The market certainly thinks it's more valuable and rewards it as such, which is a fairly good proxy for actually providing a contribution.

I've often wondered why 'the market' doesn't understand that if garbage men disappeared, my city would look like a hellscape in a week. Or why my cousin whose team keeps an entire county electrified, makes shit pay compared to me.

My conclusion was that 'the market' isn't a fairly good proxy for actually providing a contribution but as with all things human, there's also politics involved.
It's more like 'visualize individual Wikipedia articles'. Unfortunately it doesn't generate any kind of embedding for the contexts articles are embedded in or cross-linked with, although that information is available from the Wikipedia API.
Other than the grand view, it's not very readable.

Might be good for use in a kiosk environment. On a personal device it's not a fun reading experience.
We don't know much since there's not any details, but in theory at least you're supposed to see less ads on Twitter's premium tier. I figured there's a possibility that a similar policy is in place here. Maybe I'm being too optimistic, it is Meta after all.
There's nothing in this article about the launch -- I was hoping to start a conversation about the future of brands' social media engagement with their customers. I was under the impression that type of discussion was appropriate for this site. Was that not right?
> The path integral really shouldn't be taken too literally. It's not reality, it's just an equation.

While it's always important to point out that the current paradigm might be overthrown tomorrow, it is ALSO important to understand different ways of describing what the current paradigm says!

The "bizarre" trajectories that contribute to the path integral are not optional; they're really there and you can arrange interference experiments to make their physical importance clear.
> "They" implies multiple

No.
It doesn't.

The Oxford English Dictionary traces singular they back to 1375, where it appears in the medieval romance William and the Werewolf

The New Oxford Dictionary of English (1998) not only accepts singular they, they also use the form in their definitions.

And the New Oxford American Dictionary (Third Edition, 2010), calls singular they ‘generally accepted’ with indefinites, and ‘now common but less widely accepted’ with definite nouns, especially in formal contexts.

https://public.oed.com/blog/a-brief-history-of-singular-they...

Please, learn English.
Guess why: https://youtube.com/shorts/rrupUTaCAUY?feature=share
I will have a look thanks.
As for my vaporware, the first obvious subdomains would be for company->location->department->person.
For variables I would use ->xxx->uuid->yyy to create indexed threads for high speed lookups.
Just an idea, but I do love mail.
This assumes that working capital management is magic and is not part of making business. If it was not the case, cloud hosting like AWS would have failed before even starting. And yet here we are, spending more per unit to free working capital.
> people rally to annonuce that it’s too conservative

That’s a bit of a surprise to me. The most common conplaint I heard was “it’s wrong, but we need to keep it around otherwise there’s no way to compare cross-studies”.

We have decades and decades of BMI based classification, and publishing a paper today that needs results from past studies will automatically bind it to BMI. Same on public policies, defining obesity threshold a completely different way would require more politics than most groups are able to tackle.

It’s like coming up today with a different way to count nutrients from calories, technical merit won’t make it prevail over the whole world that has been built around calories.
This looks nice! Dark mode would be great or the CSS styles which work when I turn to dark mode using extensions like Dark Reader
You can block channel recommendations by removing the html bits that contains them.

There is also the 'unhook' extension:

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/unhook-remove-yout...

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-recom...
I kind of see the group that Doctor Strange is a part of as planning, building, and creating an organization dedicated to protecting Earth from invasion.

A lot of heroes are basically shown as superpowered police officers. Which is obviously a reactive job (outside of PSAs, community watch, and other such things). Militaries are more creative and active, and less reactive, so the heroes in military-like (or war-like) settings are more like the villians, only for good or order.
Yes, especially Chechens
> DOS based Windows (like 95, 98, ME)

Those Windows versions were a proper OS as well, MS-DOS run inside a virtual DOS box or rebooting into it.

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20071224-00/?p=24...
> Facebook wants to charge me $12 a month, for them to look at this ID once.

Your $12/month also covers access to a support service. I guess that's what you're actually paying for.
> which is better than 50%

Unrelated: p-value for getting 12 from 20 correct just by chance is ~0.4 that is
there is not enough data for the conclusion "better" in this case.

Null hypothesis: 50%/50%, the result random, normal distribution:

H0: p=1/2
H1: p!=1/2 (two-tail)

import statistics

p0 = 0.5 # proportion of successes according to null hypothesis
n = 20 # sample size
p_sample = 12/n # 12 from 20 are correct

sigma = (p0 * (1 - p0) / n)**.5 # std according to H0
z_score = (p_sample - p0) / sigma # test statistic
p_value = 2*statistics.NormalDist().cdf(-abs(z_score)) # prob. two-tails
# p-value -> 0.4
We need to make these popular again
Yeah, I'd put at 100x at least, most probably the OP wanted to be generous to the McKinsey individuals.
This assumes that the returns are not laundered via some other method as the non-profit board decides makes sense; for example, below market rates to entities owned by the board or their significant partners.

Most troubling aspect to me is that OpenAI goal is to create AGI that exist for OpenAI sole control. Non-profit or not, AGIs shouldn’t be controlled by anyone.
Show HN: Free Addon to Generate Presentation with AI
People think that the happiness (in the way society thinks about it) is a given. It is not.

There’s a lot that goes into you being able to “do nothing” / be present / mindful / enjoy the moment.

Many exceptional people sacrificed their happiness to build the world that you can enjoy. And if you want that to continue, many more will have to do the same.
Exactly! I'm doing this for German language. It is rare for translators to get correctly how people talk in German and chatGPT is astonishingly good at that task.
I run vpcs and homeserver
I avoid all the DNS and port forwarding issues by having a wireguard Server in obenbsd that also runs unbound, so i habe some internal DNS entrys for stuff i host at home linke Cale der and co tacts
They're talking about antibiotics resistance.
Do the kids participating in, say, the math Olympiad not receive an amount of tutoring and exposure to satisfy these criteria?
It is as much C, as MISRA, Frama-C et al are.

Or C coding on Windows with SAL.
It helps me with analysis paralysis.
The flickering comes from the fundamental nature of the de-noising mechanism involved in the diffusion model. The ability to create multiple novel images for the same input comes from adding noise with a random seed. Currently this is more or less done every frame which is why you get the flickering. Keeping the same seed wouldn't be helpful if you want the image to move.

What could be of use here is a noise transformation layer that can use the same noise for every frame but transformed to match desired motion. For video conversion you could possibly extract motion vectors from successive frames to warp the noise.

I assume someone is working on this somewhere.
It's possible. I haven't had time to look into it. If someone wanted to do a proof of concept it would certainly be interesting.
It’s probably some sort of missing childhood syndrome, where you didn’t get to experiment enough with identities as a child. But as long as you are doing this with similar people and in a community, who cares, be happy.

What’s ridiculous is the types who want to force this play on others, especially the aggressive trans types, who claim any misgendering is basically violence, or want biological males in female changing rooms, because that’s the game they want to play. It’s extremely damaging narcissistic behaviour and wanting to control others.
Stop watching movies (including YouTube videos) and looking at images online. Do this for an extended period of time and you will begin to slowly regain your ability to imagine visuals.
This seems quite similar to Windows SAL attributes, it is better than nothing, but doesn't really get us there.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/code-quality/understan...
4 is a mistake. The fundamental primitive for multiprocessing is message passing and release/acquire is just that, basically release is send and acquire is receive. If you have to go lock free, there are well-known patterns to communicate from one thread to another, and you should use those instead of just a sequentially consistent atomic.

The best solution, however, is just to split your data and use coarse-grained mutexes.
[Ultimately, arguments against cultured meat could hamper the progress of animal liberation. Vegans should not permit this]

Get fucked Wired. Dude is 24 years old and is telling me exactly what the nascent industry wants. There's plenty of reasons to dislike meat even if it was excess that grows on cows and has to be plucked for their benefit.
Ougon Bat/The Golden Bat [1] predates Super-man by 8 years.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Bat
A pay cut, they should take a large pay cut. And do a proportional layoff at the executive level. How is that hard to understand?

What do you gain by defending execs by reducing their criticism to absurd?
How dare they charge money for something that costs money, surely regulation can make everything free!
Parents obsessing over the intellectual fate of their children is just a middle-bourgeois endeavour, it reeks of desperation and of missed opportunities (for those adults themselves).
Any examples? Would love to try some.
join the list.

https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=levels.fyi
One, Ask HN questions tend to be specific; HN is not a forum where people do long discussions on general topics for their own sake.

Two, most HN readers are regulars, sometimes very regular. We will notice a string of submissions.

Third, you're not looking to 'start a conversation', you're looking to promote a product. We're not children.

Please, just respect the mores of the community you are dealing with. You have been 3 3 years and this is the second time you've tried to get a product off the ground, so it's not like you don't know.
The Sega CD and 32x, sure. But the Saturn shouldn't have existed? Sega might as well have gone home if they weren't going to compete with the N64 or PSX.
In the USA it depends by state. Many East Coast counties have speed cameras and red light cameras.

California doesn't have speed cameras but certain jurisdictions have red light cameras. And it depends by jurisdiction whether you have to pay or send it to /dev/null.

In Arizona I know of Scottsdale having speed cameras. Not sure how they get around the legality.

In Germany they take a photo of the front of your car, so your face is on it... Unless you drive there with a left-hand drive car: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1081607/Speeding-pu...

In Belgium it's way worse. Picture of the back of your car and you have to pay. No way around it. In fact, if you want to fight the ticket you need to pay to see the photo. How's that for discovery?
https://twitter.com/TDS_95514874/status/1626817468839911426
This is probably the best use of controlnet I have found to combat temporal inconsistency.

Also fun fact, the human poses can be out-of-distribution and still works: https://twitter.com/toyxyz3/status/1626977005270102016
McKinsey consultants are making the worls worst. That one is easy.
Indeed. But I see these as workarounds for very particular requirements, not as ways to build new software in a responsible way if other options exist.
Kids are at school way before software engineers start work - same applies to kindergarten. I don't cook, my kids never had lunch during weekdays at home as they eat at school. School starts at 5 years of age, so, unless you're breeding constantly, what you describe is a fringe case. Also, I use Instacart, DoorDash grocery delivery, Shipt, Costco Same Day, and many others and do not set foot at a grocery store (sometimes I do pickups) - I only physically shop at farmers' markets where we must cherry-pick the produce. Also, I don't cook, my wife does in the evenings, and I've been doing IF for 15+ years, so, my first meal for the day is at 4-5 PM. I don't have pets as I would rather spend that money supporting a child in Latin America or Africa using the various sites such as Compassion.com. Anyway, I'm a fringe case as well.
Which kind of proves the point of all these approaches not being able to be nothing more than bandaids.
Yes, that's why I'd make my own string type. But it always turned out to be more trouble than it was worth, because every other piece of C code wanted to use 0 terminated strings.
What makes you think there is no technogical progress without few suffering geniuses?
The problem here is that you're equating market value with everyday value. A bit like when people say evolution is just a theory, and there's a line between scientific theory and everyday theory.

Only in this case, why should we think the market value is the only thing to care about? Sure the market gives a number to every good and service, but are we not entitled to dispute whether that number is the right number?
Yes, that is very true. But it is a risk I'll have to take. But a good reminder to check if there are still 'dangling pointers' to old social media accounts.
Nice! Maybe it's just Offaly.