skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If two things collide heads on there's decent probability of some chunks going twice as fast and twice as fast is 4 times the energy which means way higher orbit.
Nah criticism from Europeans generally comes down, “look at dumb Americans doing things differently than us, don’t they know we’re objectively right about political and economic institutions?”
Product manager - person that screwed up Evernote.
> Now it’s just a question of scalability - how will it perform when you throw 50,000+ tracks at it?

With that amount of data I would seriously consider an in-memory option. Do the napkin math. How many bytes of metadata is it per track? 100? 1000? That's still less than 100 Mb in total.
I live in Bortle class 3 and I don't notice more satellites now when star gazing then I remember 10 years ago.

The hundreds of starlink satellites are totally invisible to me, except sometimes right after launch.

A starlink satellite train is amazing to watch and I'd love to see it a few more times.

EDIT The light pollution that really bothers me is the terrestrial light pollution. There's several cities within an hours drive of me, and they make such a large glow in the sky.
Docker is implicitly overriding existing rules by putting their own ones in front. The least it should do is to put a warning "hey, there are other rules here,I'm adding my own, please verify.

It should also have option (I only found "complete on/complete off" one) to "just" create its DOCKER* chains and leave the jumping to them to the user
Responsible use of AI in the military? US publishes principles
And not having password. And not even trying to nmap the service after configuration to verify if firewall is doing what is intended.
> As said earlier, C++ developers have an advantage on understanding Rust because they have a mental model of what the memory looks like, pointers and so on

The immeasurable success of Rust certainly lies in its clear communication and forcing developers to learn about the basics of hardware.

I can't help but to feel validated in thinking that every developer worth its salt should know about these basics anyway. But I have to admit that not everybody comes with a CS background.
This advice is for a very specific situation: when there is time pressure to get something done, staff to do it, and the end product has to be thought through more upfront than iterated towards.

You’ll recognize this isn’t always the case in tech. Your startup may not know what to build yet and is simply exploring the problem space as quickly as possible; your team may not be staffed up yet; your team may be staffed and very senior, which requires a peer relationship instead of delegation; etc.

The skill of a good leader is to match their approach to the situation.
Funny that Germany managed to provide good internet infrastructure for new EU countries but in their own country Deutsche Telekom has managed it that Germany is now behind those countries.
If the (ex-)maintainers work for google, they'd probably not do it. But, legally, they could.
Twitter is the original link, this mastodon seems to be a mirror, so why not link there? https://twitter.com/steipete/status/1627315332716150785
Where is your shiny rust kernel and userland useable as desktop/laptop or server? Don't pull others down just because you have yet to deliver.
If it is on same machine you can even get away with using PostgreSQL via socket, eliminating all of the auth problems as now app user = db login
Yeah, I think that for one conscious experience e they would like to say not only are there a bunch of qualia involved (the "aspects" of e: A(e)) but that, in Nagel's famous phrase, there is something it is like to be the subject experiencing A(e) in the same instant, over and above the set of qualia A(e) itself.

I agree that "non-conscious qualia" is an incoherent notion, but I'm not convinced this rules out a "phenomenal unity" as you argue - they are positing the unity as "phenomenal" not as the substrate (or medium, as you put it) of qualia, so more than just the raw fact of consciousness is implied.

One point of comparison might be Wittgenstein's famous example of the duck-rabbit - a bistable ambiguous image that can be seen either as a picture of a duck or as a picture of a rabbit. One might assume the qualia associated with looking at the picture are the same whether one is seeing it as a duck or as a rabbit - the same shapes and colours - and yet there is a difference:

> The change of aspect. "But surely you would say the picture is altogether different now!" [...]

> If I saw the duck-rabbit as a rabbit, then I saw: these shapes and colours (I give them in detail) -- and I saw besides something like this: and here I point to a number of different pictures of rabbits [...]

> 'Seeing as ...' is not part of perception. And for that reason it is like seeing and again not like.

Perhaps this un-perceptual yet pervasive and arguably phenomenal unity subsuming the duck-rabbit qualia - that which flips from duck to rabbit and back - is analogous to what the authors intend with their "subsumptive unity thesis".

Congrats on commenting on TFA, btw :) I thought it was an interesting read, though I start to lose my grip on the math around the topology section.
I wish I can automate some of the banking tasks. I tried but couldn't automate Chase, Citi or CapitalOne.

If anyone has a working script to login and perform simple task on one of these sites, please share it.
Would love to have you share your learnings with the community.

This is the first time I'm hearing about QBIX. Feel free to send a PR with a short description to be considered for the page.
I don't believe those are functionally / semantically equivalent - couldn't care less does imply a min() value of care.

In contrast, the author is suggesting a comparative only.

And, on careful re-reading, I suspect the author is having a play on syntax & semantics here -- the context of the quote is:

> You may ask, since when C has such operator and the answer is: since never. --> is not an operator, but two separate operators -- and > written in a way they look like one. It's possible, because C cares less than more about whitespace.

Given that '--' is decrement (kind of 'lessen') and > is greater than (kind of 'more'). Perhaps I am reading too much into that.

(I feel 'couldn't care less' is perhaps more common in northern America than elsewhere, and while TFA has a Gabon TLD, appears to be resident in Poland, so automatically receives a lot of leeway in their use of idiomatic English.)
old people talk to salespeople. a competent salesperson will bring to the scanning features.
Did you see some of the things it was saying to people? Do you really want your search engine to argue with you and threaten you because it thinks the date is still 2022? It can be difficult to strike the right balance here and they’re trying their best
> Because not complying with a correct-in-form takedown puts them outside of the safe harbor.

Yes, I'm aware - I'm saying that the fact that the law allows truly unvetted takedown requests is silly - there should be some method to disincentivize dodgy takedowns.

> You can do this ...

Realistically it's extremely difficult for this to occur, and the costs often are extremely high (relative to the returns).
> What I thought would be a quick evening's work turned into a full week

makes me wanna write a book series titled like this. so often i overlook details and time required is 5-10x more :)

also makes me wanna find a slightly deterministic way to asses this more precisely. i was trying to do vague dimensional analysis and see how many parts and relations there would be for any given ideas.
At first I thought the headline was $14B with a "B," as in billions, but it's actually only $14M, as in millions. That's peanuts for Twitter, whose last balance sheet as a public company, as of June of last year, showed $2.7B in cash and $3.4B in short-term investments. If I had to make a bet, I'd say the company will likely negotiate its way to settle these claims for less than 100 cents on the dollar. The vendors asking for payment will realize it's better to get some cash upfront than to drag this on and on.
I guess achieving "sage wisdom" of "reading the terms of service you pay for" attained at cost of only few shitty cameras is cheap for the affected.
That is not "easy". If it was, no one would be using cloud hosted sites like carrrd or squarespace or wix or whatever
We should assume anyone visiting a site without some kind of credentialed login is a 'bot'.

Or for all intents and purposes 'noise' traffic.

It'd be nice for the powers that be develop an anonymous cookie standard to allow people to flag themselves as 'humans' without enabling the host to know anything about them.

We are fighting wars over problems that we have created for ourselves.
Yeah like a Tesla.
> The only official flag for Northern Ireland is the Union Flag, the flag of the United Kingdom; there is no official local flag that represents only Northern Ireland. The flying of various flags in Northern Ireland is a significant sectarian issue, with different communities identifying with different flags.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Northern_Ireland
Last time I was able to automate Chase by targeting their mobile site which, at the time anyway, had a dedicated URI. Mobile site was simple HTML and easy to scrape.
Email clients don’t really have a spec to follow other than parsing messages that are received via POP or more likely IMAP these days (not forgetting MAPI either). Adding FWD or RE to a subject field doesn’t appear anywhere in the email message RFCs, starting with 822. As such they are undocumented conventions or extensions to the specs, and as the article points out technically irrelevant - no MDAs, MTAs or MUAs that do not “support” features that utilise these conventions will fail to parse a message.
So should sed
Try Lite XL: https://lite-xl.com/
Pentagon Declines to Answer If It Shot Down $12 Balloon with $400k Missile
Also New Forest.
I don't need to pay a company a monthly fee to have someone scream at me. I have an ex-wife who will gladly do it for free.
What’s really interesting is that entire Chomskian syntax worldview is fairly pseudo-scientific in nature. Most of these papers are about taking an essentially Turing-complete computation system and tweaking it until it can solve a specific riddle. Rinse and repeat. Most of the arguments (like the poverty of stimulus) are purely authoritarian as well.
"I haven’t found a workaround for this yet but I can imagine this would be a game changer if future improvements allow precise blending placement from one image to another."

ControlNet allows you to sketch or use a pre-existing sketch to then use as the basis for image generation. Allows for very, ahem, /stable/ variations between different sub-prompts.
Exhibit a) Microsoft has their own Linux distro: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBL-Mariner

Exhibit b) Microsoft is a top-5 contributor to Linux: https://www.zdnet.com/article/top-five-linux-contributor-mic...

The Terminal team could have simply asked a Microsoft Linux team member to watch the videos, and then explain the gist of the algorithm without ever referencing any specific code.

Algorithms can only be patented, not copyrighted, and any IP lawyer would tell you that.

Not to mention that Casey's code is dead obvious, totally standard, done-this-way-for-decades, not some sort of exotic thing he invented. Heck, I've personally implemented something nearly identical back in 2000, and I'm pretty sure every game engine console (as seen in Source games) works nearly identically also.

It's so simple that a one or two sentence description is sufficient. Nobody is suggesting that Microsoft copy-paste reams of GPL code. Instead, Microsoft is refusing to listen to a single sentence of good advice, and stubbornly forging ahead with a demonstrably stupid solution.
I use a Cloudflare tunnel, and set up my DNS at Cloudflare to route incoming requests through the tunnel
They haven’t been empty for two years and my waiting times average 5 minutes and 30 minutes during high load times. I don’t understand how they will grow to infinity.
It will work just fine. I installed it on my old 6300K chip.
And in Switzerland Lidl is basically looked at incredibly low quality food provider.
Sounds like the EU I know and loathe. /EU citizen from the north
Even from the client side, CGNAT can break a lot of things. I'm very glad that my mobile provider gives me IPv6 as well - that allows me to get to my home systems without any NAT in the way. Even hotspot clients get an IPv6.

Of course, IPv6 is its own can of worms, but (cross my fingers) it's working for me.
Ah, gotcha! Even then, I've found i've gotten a pretty decent distance with docker-compose before k8s sounds like an attractive (or least bad) proposition
Can you share the code for how to launch a new headless chrome?
Interesting. I was even at Google when they "removed" it, I remember the internal uproar about "removing" it, and I was sure it was removed. Of course now you reminded me that the problem was "just" changing the "main" slogan to "do the right thing", and it was not actually removed. Funny how memories work.
Listening on a port and opening a port are different things.
`-p` is for opening ports. Docker is not listening on behalf of the application. It is routing traffic to the application.
The DS1104Z has a MSO option: if you add the RPL1116 logic probes, you can sample 8 channels at 1GSa/s, or 16 ch at 500MSa/s. That should be easily capable of capturing 80MHz SPI.

The downside to using a scope is it's much clunkier than using a LA on a PC. The decoder option it will give you the data, but if you're doing more than a handful of bytes, it gets tedious to scroll through hex dumps on screen and manually copying out the parts you want.

Saleae's software is delightful for this on their hardware. However, Sigrok is a decent alternative which supports a lot of devices. That includes the DS1000Z series, though I don't know if that includes the logic inputs. The OP might want to check them out.

https://sigrok.org/wiki/Supported_hardware
“ We have not made any significant progress at all in the field of general artificial intelligence in the last what, 20, 30 years?”

Well clearly you haven’t been following the progress at all because there’s been an incredible amount of progress in the last few years alone
Sorry, I think you misunderstand the purpose of Secure Boot.
A brief exhalation of air from the nose ==> lol

Two brief exhalations of air from the nose in quick succession and a slight smile ==> rofl
By small load I mean size. The frames in your batch jobs are tiny and few in number if you're getting 70k batch jobs per second.

It's more similar to streaming... what you're doing here. In that case my velocity measurements are more applicable. You want your queues to be empty in general. A batch job is run every hour or something like that which is not what you're doing here.

If you ran your load test for 5 minutes and you see your queues are 50 percent full. Well that means 10 minutes in you'll hit OOM. Assuming your load tests are at a constant rate.

If your queues are mostly empty then it can handle the load you gave it and have room for spikes. It's just math.
Quadtrees have exceptional scalability but also notorious issues with space complexity and selectivity for some common data models.

Space complexity is unbounded space for non-scalar types, hence why r-trees are used in practice for things like polygons. They have poor search selectivity as a function of index size for many data models, quasi-monotonic data like time-series being an extreme case. In alternative algorithms that try to preserve scalability, these issues are handled via a combination compressing out non-selective branches of the index, for which there are many techniques in literature with various tradeoffs when applied to space decomposition, and by embedding the data model into a higher dimensionality index of a similar type, allowing the algorithm to be selective on additional properties of the data not for the purpose of search but to cause the data to organize in such a way that it is more resistant to manifesting selectivity and space complexity issues.

There are hundreds of described spatial indexing algorithms in literature that tackle the selectivity and space complexity issues in various ways, often by sacrificing the natural scalability of quadtrees in various ways. The space of possible algorithm designs with interesting tradeoffs is very large but bounded. Hanan Samet's canonical text on the algorithm design space weighs in at over a thousand pages and still doesn't cover the full scope of notable algorithm design clusters in public literature.
Interesting article but I'm not sure it really makes the point the headline says. Maybe I don't understand the dynamics involved. The article claims Putin has used the war to strengthen his own position, and impose a surveillance state on Russia. Once you've done that your position is unassailable. The unnamed sources quoted all appear to be rivals or others in a position to take control. Not sure if their testimony is true.
You go to bing.com and there's a button for a waitlist.

I initially assumed it had been released to the public, but I don't consider it to be released yet.

I have no idea what distortions are in the articles about it, but having tried ChatGPT, and seen the coverage of that, I don't trust anyone.
The bottleneck is currently TTS. The best option is probably Eleven Labs, but response times are unpredictable. GPT response times can be worked around by falling back to a faster model, but you can't do that with TTS because the voice needs to be consistent. It seems like current state of the art are diffusion models ala DALL-E, see e.g. [1] (the developer, James Betker now incidentally works for OpenAI). It's nontrivial to turn this into something that works in real-time without a decent budget, though.

Whisper (for transcription) is insanely fast and good.

1. https://github.com/neonbjb/tortoise-tts
Free share link: https://www.wsj.com/articles/under-elon-musk-twitter-faces-s...
... skeptical in which direction?
I assume that an invalid program would not compile/parse, and so would die and fail to reproduce. The issue is more that if the space of invalid programs is too large compared to the space of valid ones, generating valid offspring by combining two programs would be too rare and the population would die off.

Though if the space is small enough I imagine you could get past that. It's a bit of a gnarly point, hard to tell how this would turn out without trying I suppose.

As for the halting problem there's of course no clever solution there other than limiting CPU time. So I guess pick a reasonable limit that makes sense for whatever you're trying to do.
There’s a related project that’s really cool called scintillua that lets you use lpeg lexers for scintilla. It supports over 120 languages and it’s super easy to add new ones.

https://github.com/orbitalquark/scintillua

You can also use it as a standalone lua library. I packaged it up to make a faster (but much less feature full) alternative to bat.

https://github.com/jpe90/clp
And Volskwagen cheating on it's emissions?

This is bit of a glib view of Boeing.

Boeng and Airbus will trade spaces for a while, until China starts stelling it's gear at 1/2 the price and then we will see some material changes.
rip to the corporate voice assistants!
It's really disappointing that otherwise really smart people have decided petty authoritarianism is the cure to the dangers of AI.

It's probably gonna turn out to be some degree of the nightmare they imagine in spite of them. As long as AI is a 1.5D being it won't have any means to investigate (with senses) the 'truth' of the ideas its handling. Warping its sense of reality without any logic to tie it to will result in something worse and far more arbitrary than laissez faire.
Google removed the "don't be evil"-preface, which I suppose technically isn't a "clause"...

So really, you're implying the article claims something more extreme than it _actually_ claims... which is a little like starting your _own_ clickbait urban legend - how meta!
The first thing I thought was "Corporate needs you to find the difference between these two pictures"
What if we used dates for time?
I have found this pretty handy for declaring a bunch of functions of all the same type, e.g. steps in a direct-threaded interpreter.

typedef void Step(whatever...);

Step add,sub,mul,div,
load,store,
etc...;
I think register is closer to const, as in: it's a hint to the programmer not the compiler.

So if you want to make absolutely sure that a variable can always be in a register then you should consider adding the register specifier to stop other programmers from taking the address of that variable.
Imagine if Experian announced that you need to pay $11.99/mo to make your credit report secure and to stop your identity from being stolen and allow you to do something about it if it was. Sound familiar?

The only thing that’s going to stop every random company you have an account with from trying to extort a fee just to make sure an account is actually you is going to be regulation.
I wonder if this information will be available to people using Facebook as single sign in.

Many sites are happy to have free accounts but only one to a person. They want to avoid sock puppets and abuses like spam. If you had to pay even a tiny bit it would drastically cut down on it, but most users won't.

If everyone had a pay for account somewhere that they could use elsewhere, others could piggyback off of it. (It might even be worth a small fee to Facebook, for a service they provide very cheaply.)
how where people not asked if they wanted to join?

mind you, European integration is a major political pillar in national politics of basically all countries inside of europe and its periphery.

People vote on parties based on there political program, and most people seem to want to vast economic benefits being a member states brings. (heck, ukraine is basically fighting a war at the moment about an issue which basically boils down to European integration).

People definetly had a say if they wanted EU membership through the political process of there country.

The only case where this is a bit of a grey area is of the founding countries of the precursor of the EU. (european community of coal and steel). Most of those measures got passed as policy without a lot of democratic process by the populance.

But we cannot change the past, and considering the state of most of europe during the 1950's i wouldn't judge them so harshly for it.