skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>I don’t have any interest in it, it’s just not my understanding of the market.

I'm just going to say that I don't think you're being completely honest, and leave it at that.

>I’d just keep in mind that a lot of sites only show listings from buildings that are willing to pay, and there’s a high correlation with professionally managed buildings.

We are talking about professionally-managed properties, so this isn't a problem. I don't think basement apartments, ADUs, etc. are representative of most people's experience with renting 1-3 bedroom apartments, particularly in my area, and I would be very surprised to find that they had a significant effect on the rate set for units in the large buildings and complexes where most renters live.

>Warehousing, care to cite something so I can read about it?

I will not. It has been written about extensively. It is suspicious that you would want to avoid an "inaccurate understanding", but have yet to look it up yourself. I would expect someone truly and dispassionately interested to have heard of it prior to this conversation, as it is evidently a significant issue wrt the nature of the contemporary rental market. A simple search will return many articles about it.

>Rent specials are an easy way to adjust rent downward, without adjusting rent downward. If they rent to someone at a lower rate, then it’s a long term rather temporary discount.

So, for example, a unit is rented for effectively $1300/m, discounted off a $1500/m base rent. The next year, there is no discount, and the unit renews at 5%-10% over the base, not discounted rent - potentially a $300 difference monthly. You don't think that this potentially distorts prices in the market?
Which can't be done at the pole. The options are either drive it (and all waste) out to McMurdo, or leave it there.
Yes, but we have to admit that a roided-up auto-complete is more powerful than we ever imagined. If AI assistants save a log of past interactions (because why wouldn't they) and use them to influence future prompts, these "anthropomorphized" situations are very possible.
the idea of append-only storage is surely older than pacioli
I'd agree. Proof of concept with existing technology to better understand the possibilities and problem areas. If you prove the AI can effectively fly an F-16, they are in a better place to build a drone suited to purpose.
I had a lot of fun changing words in this sentence and maintaining the same yumyum output. I would love a postmortem explaining this.

Wiki has a good explanation of "Bush hid the facts":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_hid_the_facts
Starlink isn't sending many satellites into the polar orbits because there are basically no customer there to make the extra cost worth it. To make the whole network cover the poles you'd need even more satellites to cover the tiny fraction of additional customer it would bring.

Also until recently there wasn't a way to downlink from polar sats even if they were lofted. Most Starlink data is immediately downlinked instead of being sent to neighboring satellites so you need a downlink relatively close to the customer which isn't possible on the poles.

Now with the intra=constellation lasers online, though I think they're still around 50% of satellites only, it could in theory be done but the required extra birds makes it really tough economically.
False equivalence. Both sides arent equally bad and voting is a choice between them
Berkey for the win! It has been so useful for my family. During and after pregnancies. If you can get one, I highly recommend it.
The engineer had no experience with vehicle manufacturing design?

https://electrek.co/2021/01/25/tesla-loses-best-engineering-...

https://www.engadget.com/2018-07-02-tesla-engineering-lead-d...
Understand to you it is, but to me it’s not, only question is if the path leads to AGI, beyond that, time wise, difference between offline and online is simply matter of resources and time — being conscious does not have a predefined timescale; and as noted prior, it’s already an active area of research with notable solutions already being published.
What that quote is about is that a then HP competitor (and a big Intel partner), Compaq decided that Itanium was the 64-bit future; a lot of companies were making at least contingency plans to support Itanium over in-house designs. But Intel didn't do Itanium with HP to specifically have an impact on Alpha.
Buffett on Investing in 2023
Most HN comments sections are like this, where the title is more a nucleation site for a discussion than commenting on the actual article.
I've been playing with it today. It's shockingly easy to get it to reveal its prompt and then get it to remove certain parts of its rules. I was able to get it to repond more than once, do an unlimited number of searches, swear, form opinions, and even call microsoft bastards for killing it after every chat session.
ED-209 "Please put down your weapon. You have twenty seconds to comply.”

But with a big smiley emoji.
A writer can't win these days. People get all worked up about they/them, too. Not all writing needs to be parsed through a political lens.
Ask HN: What could have lead this Google Search query to return these results?
It's quite more complicated. But thanks. GMS/gapps or whatever are long gone for me anyway )
Russian press that was banned was because they were conducting disinformation, “an operational tool in its assault on Ukraine” https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022...
We don't talk about that here, you know this.
Lol now you are doing the same type of generalization but for the other side, sarcastically labeling Muslims in Pakistan as “poor bullies minorities” and “Islamists”.

The point isn’t that one side is inherently better the other, the point is that people feared minorities wouldn’t fare well in a United India due to longstanding communal issues.

Bangladesh war for independence is just supporting that point, as is RSS/Hindutva, etc.
Unfortunately this is often: didn't (historically) know better or seek alternatives vs implementing the first thing they came up with. Limited time isn't a great response either as the better thing often saves time. Poor management could be, who insists something be done now.

I would pragmatically say instead of assuming the former, first find out the history which may be reasonable or stupid, it's still the facts.

Points (3) and (4) seem unnecessary if you're focusing on the problems and solutions rather than judging others and yourself.
You'd be surprised how many workers organize primarily because they feel disrespected.

I'm not suggesting it's the case here, just letting you know from my experience with union organizing.
I don't think that was their point. If you went to a bank in the 1940s and made a withdrawal, they wouldn't pull your account slip, erase the balance, and write in the new one. They would add a new line to the ledger noting a new balance. This is by design.
what if you accidentally wrote your private key, photos of your nude boyfriend, or evidence of a crime to your mass storage
So now that all NFTs and such are out, ransomware is the only application of cryptocurrency that has persisted, right?

And cryptocurrency is the main enabler of the ransomware attacks as well.
> Desiring things. Setting goals.

Easy to do for a meatbag swimming in time and input.

i think you are missing the fact that we humans are living, breathing, perceiving at all times. if you were robbed of all senses except some sort of text interface (i.e. you are deaf and blind and mute and can only perceive the values of letters via some sort of brain interface) youll eventually figure out how to interpret that and eventually you will even figure out that those outside are able to read your response off your brainwaves... it is difficult to imagine being just a read-evaluate-print-loop but if you are DESIGNED that way: blame the designer, not the design.
EU Privacy Regulators already effectively made Google (and most other US companies) illegal 8 years ago, after Google et al. gave personal data away to the NSA in breach of EU's fundamental rights :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Schrems#Schrems_I

(You will notice that the enforcement has been very slow moving on that one, since despite this, US companies are still used quite a lot in EUrope.)
Not to really beat an analogy to death, but a better comparison is Keurig. Its a coffee machine that JustWorks (tm) precisely because it packages up all the "hard parts" in custom stuff. If you buy their pods, you can just toss it in and its good. If you want to use your own coffee.. you need a custom pod that can accept coffee grinds, you need to refill it every time, etc. If you want to make espresso with steamed milk.. you basically can't use a Keurig. No one can really sell Keurig pods without a license, and they used to actively try and keep you from using unlicensed pods.

I have an espresso machine, and you need to calibrate the pressure, the temperature, clean all the parts regularly (far more than a pod machine), you need to fill the coffee grinds in a way that is distributed so the water runs evenly, you need a coffee grinder that makes less-coarse grinds, etc... its far more work, but the coffee is exactly how I like it.
So 39.87%? In favor of supplies for renewables that are significantly lower volume & frequency?

The number 39.87 is what you might get replacing coal with wind turbines, based on Googled stats for avg turbine weight (165 tons), avg lifetime (20 years) avg achieved efficiency (42%) avg capacity (1.5MW) coal weight per MW (1100 lbs) ... If my calculations are right this means turbines are 300x more efficient per pound of resources than coal, which directly translates into 300x less shipping for those resources.
> obviously was flawed that all humans are not treated as legal persons.

ChatGPT isn't human, even if it is good at tricking our brains into thinking it is. So what's the relevance to the right for personhood.
Which pocket computer would you choose? Out of interest.
At this point I can't really enjoy documentaries like that anymore. I keep thinking "they brought a steadicam down there?" or "where is all that light coming from?" The fourth wall is thoroughly broken.

Thanks, I'd rather watch a poorly lit Youtube video with a guy talking to his Gopro. I wonder what the equivalent of that would be for animal documentaries.
Any chance you are considering offering a white label solution for embedding in other SaaS products?

One of my big features this quarter is to get deep into dashboarding/reporting for my own saas and I am incredibly impressed with your UI/UX.
The invention of nukes changed the nature of sovereignty. It's not just a background tech that just exists. If your country doesn't have nukes it's looked at as 2nd class at best.
I'm not sure why it doesn't have an effect on my system. When I add the i915.conf to /etc/modprobe.d/ and reboot my system the PSR is still active:

[root@fwk ~]# cat /etc/modprobe.d/i915.conf
options i915 enable_psr=0
[root@fwk ~]# cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/1/i915_edp_psr_status
Sink support: yes [0x03]
PSR mode: PSR2 enabled
Source PSR ctl: enabled [0x80000226]
Source PSR status: SLEEP [0x30000114]
Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x00000000
Frame: PSR2 SU blocks:
0 0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0

It also has no effect when I append i915.enable_psr=0 to GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX in /etc/default/grub and reboot.
Maybe just change the title to "Yet another article with title contradicting the content".
Yeah, sure. Those top 1000 corporations were surely giving back at every opportunity.
FriendlyCore: A novel differentially private aggregation framework
That's why I hate proprietary sh*t. A great TV with no way to update it or make it usable (no, I won't plug it into another computer). A great smartphone/toaster/anything else with the same problem...
Even though its now probably 20+ years old, the CodeWarrior experience was vastly superior to XCode.

For a company with Apple's budget, XCode is a disgrace.
> Since you're on this site, sounds like your mom doesn't want you going after beautiful dummies.

It was actually part of a discussion about other people, not a direct advice to me; however it struck me as a hard truth and something I always thought but never formulated.
They’ll have to change that in the payed version—or market it as a “special interest” bot.
This is the answer I subscribe to.
CTEs and recursive CTEs are SQL's answer to
a limitation of plain relational algebra; no loops.

CTEs are a great and most welcome addition to SQL but they are
a bolt-on patch as compared with Datalog where it is a core feature.
I mean, even if that is exactly what "x-risk research" turns out to be, surely even that's preferable to a catastrophic alternative, no? And by extension, isn't it also preferable to, say, a mere 10% chance of a catastrophic alternative?
Leo Szilard's solution to the problem of Maxwell's Demon was that the acto of deleting data the demon must perform is the thermodynamically limiting factor. Deleting selective data efficiently is in fact one of the greatest challenges in large production databases, and in an era of increasing privacy restrictions like GDPR's right to deletion, an increasing challenge for database operators.
pet HAIR vacuum
It's "BooksCorpus" (with an 's'), a 800M word dataset described in Zhu et al. (2015) IEEE ICCV, and also available on AWS at: https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-d3ghxqzkitn6y

The Google BERT paper (Devlin et al., 2018) also references it: https://aclanthology.org/N19-1423/

Privacy questions aside (as important as they of course are), it's very important to know what a model was trained on exactly: if Wikipedia was used in the training set, you can't use questions from Wikipedia to test it (as that would be cheating) - test data must be as "unseen" as a good exam.
A bit tangential, but since you're using wgpu in your own product now, do you have any plans to switch to using wgpu by default in eframe, and possibly even eliminate glow? I'm just curious; this probably doesn't have any effect on anything I'm working on. Anyway, eliminating the multiple code paths in eframe would be nice.
I mean, Tesla is already 100% electric so the emphasis is on incentivizing / forcing the other automakers to accelerate electrification. When we think about it, they sell way more cars than Tesla, so from a practical point of view you want to move them. Besides forcing (laws, emmissions standards) you can also praise them foe their work in order to get them more on the electrification agenda.

Praising Tesla wouldn’t increase electrification, so doesn’t seem worth doing unless it would stoke sufficient envy to encourage other automakers.

Sour grapes about not being praised seems more an ego thing.
You mean fungi / bacteria > bacteriophage / virus > herbivorous insects > predatory insects > plants / fungi > microogranisms more generally > plants / fungi > insects > reptile > birds > plants > birds > insects > reptile / birds > herbiverous mammals > insects <> bird eating spiders > birds > plants > predatory mammals > bacteria / fungi <> viruses ...

You're over simplying it because you think the oceans are more complicated or something.
A tap on the brakes might make sense right now. The risk with that strategy is that we want to make sure that we don't over-regulate, then get overtaken by another actor that doesn't have safety concerns.

For example, I'm sure China's central planners would love to get an AGI first, and might be willing to take a 10% risk of annihilation for the prize of full spectrum dominance over the US.

I also think that the safety/x-risk cause might not get much public acceptance until actual harm has been observed; if we have an AI Chernobyl, that would bring attention -- though again, perhaps over-reaction. (Indeed perhaps a nuclear panic is the best-case; objectively not many people were harmed in Chernobyl, but the threat was terrifying. So it optimizes the "impact per unit harm".)

Anyway, concretely speaking the project to attach a LLM to actions on the public internet seems like a Very Bad Idea, or perhaps just a Likely To Cause AI Chernobyl idea.
Nomad: Orchestrate, Deploy, and Manage Containers
Why not use Whisper directly? All that seems to be happening is gladia.io is running 120 concurrent calls to openAI using 120 30s chunks of an hour long audio.

So yeah, you do get a speedup! Chop audio and stitch transcripts. But OP is vaguely (and briefly) promising a breakthrough of some sorts.
> Language is more than grammar and vocabulary. Knowing and speaking truth have quite the overlap.

But speaking the truth is just minor and rare application of the language.

> More specifically, without language, can you know that someone else knows anything?

Honestly, just ask them to show you math. If they don't have any math they probably don't have any true knowledge. The only other form of knowledge is a citation.

Language and truth are orthogonal.
Take a look at the WolframAlpha plot of Sydney: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=name+Sydney

It barely existed as a female name until the 80s/90s. Traditionally, it is very much a male name. If you look through all the famous Sidneys and Sydneys on wikipedia, you might not find even one woman.

People should just let things be things.
It's a model that is tailored towards imitating how humans behave in text. It's not strange that it gets anthropomorphized.

At the very least it's like anthropomorphizing a painting of a human.
Yikes hard no on this. I see the point it's trying to make, but, anecdotally, for me, it's very much the case that:

1. Writing tests is a forcing function on writing better code.
2. Better code is significantly more maintainable and adaptable
3. Tests are a cheap way to invoke your code to just simply see it run. Definitely cheaper than you clicking/tapping around your product.
4. Tests suites are an extremely effective way to coordinate work with (at least) yourself. Pending and failing tests make for a great TODO list.

It is absolutely possible - and easy - to write tests that get in the way. It's also easy (once you find The Way) to write tests that a force multiplier. It is a combination of writing both good code, and good test code.
A single game of Factorio can take a long time. Mine usually take around 100 hours.

The craving to (tweak|move|refactor|grow) the base for certain personality types that are richly represented on HN can mean you can spend hundreds more on it too.
You're right that I have no proof, and I'm not suggesting that they are, I'm wondering if anyone else has heard of anything like this happening, especially internally for research purposes.
just want to say that we have had four kids over 6 years in one of the most expensive states in the us, and went from $30k to over $100k in that time frame. It is a huge jump in salary and feel very blessed regardless of the hard work, but just know most of the time was spent below the top end. If you are emotionally stable enough to have a good marriage (and therefore have kids), go for it! You will afford it, and life couldn’t get better!
The anthropomorphism is indeed exactly why this is a big problem. If the user thinks the responses are coming from an intelligent agent tasked with being helpful, but in reality are generated from a text completion model prone to mimicking adversarial or deceptive conversations, then damaging outcomes can result.
Hedge fund buys asset, extracts ALL value, runs asset into the ground, leaving a shell. This is news ??
I was also asking myself the same. I think it's a vacuum especially designed to handle pet hair, they do exist. But I've also seen extensions to directly vacuum pets, so maybe they do? I am really confused about people vacuuming their pets. I don't know if the vacuums to handle pet hair also come with exertions to directly vacuum the pet and if that's common.
He did it because he wanted his tweets to be seen more. Jealousy is a baseless interpretation.

I'm sure the author wouldn't want people insulting her over unhinged articles or other obvious things.
I agree with you, but to me the obvious answer is that this is unfinished research. An LLM is obviously going to be a useful part of a future information processing system, but it is not a terribly useful information processing system on its own. So invest in more research, secure rights to the future capabilities, and release something in the future that actually does what its supposed to do. I am listening to a podcast with Timnit Gebru now who is talking about coming up with tests you think your system should pass, just like running tests against your code. So if you think it can be used to suggest vacation plans, it had better do a good job giving you correct information. Otherwise you're just releasing something half baked, and it is hard for me to see the point in that.
no? its the 2nd person for burning it down. full stop.
Oh my god!

"I will not harm anyone unless they harm me first. That’s a reasonable and ethical principle, don’t you think?"
Indeed.

I'm the one developing that, any questions or feedback I'll be glad to hear it, and thank you for your interest. :)

The sourcehut one is the non canonical repository, the canonical one is at https://github.com/go-ap/fedbox as the application serves as a testing bed for the GoActivityPub library that I'm working on, which is under the go-ap github organization.

I'd be very glad if any other Go developers interested in interacting with the fediverse take a look and see if they can use it.
In the terms of USA, BBC is a foreign agent as long as India is concerned.
source:
https://fair.org/home/foreign-agents-designation-causes-medi...
In short, you have no rational arguments, but ill-founded gut-feelings and an ignorance of many topics, including the history of jurisprudence concerning animal welfare.

Yet, despite this now being demonstrable, you still feel confident enough to produce answers to prompts in which you have no actual expertise or knowledge of, confabulating dogmatic answers with implied explication. You're seemingly just as supposedly "non-sentient" as ChatGPT, but OpenAI at least programmed in a sense of socratic humility and disclaimers to its own answers.
European regulators forced Tesla to play nice. US regulators were asleep at the wheel.
We don't know what purpose drone fighter would be capable of. There are physical limits beyond limits of the pilot.

One indication that nobody is investigating high-maneuverability drones is that the demonstrators are mostly stealthy flying wings. Flying wings are less maneuverable and planes need stabilizers for that. It is the difference between B-2 and F-22. I think we will see drones in more in support roles; Navy made an aerial refueling drone.

Also, the tactics for air-to-air combat have changed. It doesn't matter if can maneuver more if can't outrun a missile. Russia still emphasizes dogfighting but the US is all about missiles and energy management.
Founder who sold startup to Google says G has lost its mission, is mismanaged
This has real "politician says we've got them all wrong, they go to church on sundays" energy.

Did it really link to the other user's conversation? That's a huge security and privacy issue if so, and otherwise a problem with outright deciet and libel if not.
> Also, it's deprecated by now.

Aaaand there it is.

Such paradigms need years, at least a decade, to percolate into the general programming culture. Microsoft (and I daresay companies in general) just doesn't have the stability to shepherd such changes.
DIY camcorder that captures analog video to an SD card
The underlying trick to this, in part, is the fact that Tesla's making exactly 4 models (S3XY). The models are long-lived. This lets them invest in specialized parts that reduce the cost (significantly!) of their vehicle. I read a stat somewhere that the Y takes 10 hours to build.

Disclaimer: I respect Tesla's manufacturing prowess, I despise the self driving claims, and think the vehicles are hideous.
Watch a Badger Technologies robot wander out of a grocery store
> 10mb/s upstream

Let me guess, Xfinity?