skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Fascinating. Now, I want to try it before the humans put a stop to it :)
You would think HN would refrain from posting every single mistake for these things...
Folks with Tesla FSD, please find an empty parking lot and drive all you want. It helps Tesla's mission. Please don't test it on real roads. At least not on busy roads
> As an aside, how would a notification steal your info?

How about:

“Hey dear user you won {amount} of money please click here and fill this totally safe form”

This was me thinking for a solid 3 seconds, imagine if someone put some effort into the message.
My last thoughts as I gasped for air in the gripping cold of the Martian plain was, "Wait, this is it?"
You can put them on a hidden home screen. It's a pain, but it's the only way to keep the app but not have it on your home screen.
I'd still give Hersh the benefit of the doubt he's not just listening to some internet troll type person. There has to be some reputation at play here for him to take it seriously. The odds are high it's someone connected to the US or NATO govs. At least you'd assume so. As another commenter mentioned, he claimed he used to the same fact checkers used by The New Yorker.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMSI-catcher
We seem to be talking at cross purposes. I understand (at a very high level) what LLMs do, and I don't think they can do actual computation.

Why do you insist on things I've already said I understand? I know ChatGPT is not good at maintaining state -- though it can fake it convincingly (which understandably, seems to trip people up). I think it looks at your chat history within the session in order to generate the next response, which is why it can "degenerate" within a single session (but also, it's how it can fake and make it seem it's keeping state, by looking at the whole history before each reply).

I don't understand the rest of your answer. You seem to be really upset at "the people".

PS:

> So by induction once we know that the bestMove function is correct

"By induction", nope. Prove it. Run an actual full game instead of arguing with me. It will take you shorter to play the game than to debate with me.
Download the Twitter and PWA apps. Compare the two.

If you think the only difference between them is push notifications and one click install then of course you will think PWA will be a success. But a lot of us can easily see the difference.

And based on the last 15 years of real world experience there are enough users like us to sink the hopes of PWA apps.
Cost (reputational as well as CSR hours and the actual replacement units) of a bunch of warranty claims for bricked units is a factor too.

In practice pretty much every embedded device I've worked on that has supported in-field firmware updates has had either double buffering and/or a recovery mode to limit the possibility of bricking.

For the products where every last penny really needs to get squeezed out of the BOM (toys, low-end appliances, ...) the ability to do in-field firmware upgrades itself is IME often one of the first things to go.
Sure, just like all who voted for JFK were right then and there baptized as Catholics
does this neptyne also work off-cloud?
e.g. now way that i'll upload my data into the void.
iMessage now supports rich content previews for Mastodon posts
I'm not sure what the prorated cost of the fighter jets and crew to shoot these things down was, but I have seen multiple news reports that the cost of the missiles was around $450k apiece. In at least one incident, two missiles were needed after the first missed.
Exactly!

```
To start submitting statistics, install the mpstats port in your MacPorts installation.

sudo port install mpstats
```
Copilot every single day. It's part of my work flow now, to the point where I feel uncomfortable working without wifi.

For school work, I use https://delilah.ai - shameful plug, I'm building it.
I’ve seen a lot of articles criticizing these models for getting information wrong. I understand there is a lot of hype, and that choosing the hate train or the hype train will gets you lots of press, but does anyone actually believe these models will be right most of the time?

It’s just another tool that can be used when researching or trying to understand something. You still have to do your due diligence and evaluate the information. That has always been the case, even with traditional search.
will do, appreciate it
Zipties. So. Many. Zipties.
No, it's not pedantry at all. It just sounds like you are not at all familiar with New York City. Delivery services almost exclusively use e-Bikes(which must be charged) and gas powered scooters. Further in New York City you have always been able to walk a few blocks and pick up your own groceries, stick them in your canvas bag and then put the trash in the city provided recycling bins. This actually was the "status quo" before the endless onslaught of vc-backed food delivery services. It still is the status quo for many. Lastly the city also runs a program called ZeroWaste where you can also bring your foods scraps for composting.[1] There are literally hundreds of ZeroWaste drop off locations which are often located in parks and green markets. You can actually pedal a bike in a dedicated bike lane or take the train to get there.

[1] https://www.grownyc.org/compost
> But no, instead you want to prove to me that ChatGPT is some parlor trick…

Excuse me, what?

I'm sorry, I've zero interest in discussing NASM or Lisp or whatnot. This was about the limitations of ChatGPT, not whatever strikes your fancy.
Virgin Orbit Update on UK Mission Anomaly
An automatic software update is not a recall.
Apple doesn't even follow their own rules on this.
you make a compelling argument
well yeah if thats the case its not really a recall, agreed
Corrected. It was a youtube frontend I use to make youtube lighter and less invasive.
I am interacting in good faith. A lie requires a falsehood. There is a difference between a lie and deception - they aren't perfect synonymous. The example from your cited definition is really a poor one since it relies on a saying more than a factual use of the word, and the example itself does imply an actual falsehood in that someone lied during the marriage vows or during the marriage.

But wait, let's look at the instant replay. You claim that lying and deception at the same. So why would you get involved in this conversation to say that? According to you, their use is interchangeable and makes no difference.

If you have something to add to the actual conversation and not about definitions, then please do.
Nobody thinks lasagne is “too hard” and you have not really read the responses.

I have literally no doubt whatsoever that there are people out there with all the time, knowledge, energy and equipment to cook themselves nice food, but who survive on ready-made or other more expensive food sources.

The problem is that every single discussion about this topic ends up with responses ignoring that it’s way more complex than “people who don’t make lasagne are lazy”. It’s a particular kind of facile that seeks simplistic solutions of complex issues.

This comes up as a public conversation at least once a year in the UK, when some politician inevitably says “I can feed a family of 12 for two pounds a day on fresh produce I collect from the bargain bin!” Meanwhile there are two million people in the UK living without a cooker.
There is no limit on the waste, and therefore no market. It is an arbitrary price placed by politicians. Imagine if oil prices were not dicated by a market and a by a production cartel rather by politicans in the US.
I don't think its individual 'truth failures' driving such a largescale change, but rather a gradual big-picture slide. For a softball example, an article on the front page of Hacker News right now is "Study Suggests Fructose Could Drive Alzheimer's Disease." See enough articles making such declarations and where they lead, and you gradually start dismissing them as probable junk without even opening them. It's not because you've carefully debunked past studies, but simply because what was implied (major breakthrough) and what happened (nothing) don't jive.

So a better example for your search might be to go back to the Internet Archive, and grab the NYTimes from a year ago. And start reading the articles, and see if things ended up logically leading where the articles imply they would. Beyond this I also don't think you can, in good faith, disentangle opinion from fact. Yes we SHOULD, but it's not like people carefully scrutinize a headline or article to assess whether it was categorized as opinion, and then largely disregard it if so. People treat opinion and factual reporting, more or less, the same. And sites intentionally interweave them in order to drive clicks. So you can't have your cake and eat it. Generate clicks by publishing junk, and people are just going to remember you publishing junk.
I know it's fun to troll, but the point of all these conversations and articles is:

1. You don't need to bait these products to get them to go off the rails. They do it on their own, in response to innocuous inputs, because they're not really all that well tuned. Will they be? Can they be? Probably. Are they? Definitely not.

2. If companies are going to masquerade these technologies as anthropomorphized agents rather than mechanical tools, they are going to face social consequences when those "agents" misbehave. It's all a parlor trick, of course, but OpenAI and Microsoft are trying really hard to get everyone to pretend otherwise. As long as they do, they can expect to get called out by the rules of their own game.
I asked for 2. and 3. thanks for clarifying.
fourandtwenty isn't the OP.
The biggest problem about US gun laws is that they are written in an extremely "all-or-nothing" fashion. There are a bunch of European countries where you can own modern semi-auto rifles and handguns privately, and they don't have the homicide/suicide rates of the US.

The thing is that almost every other country in the world handles private firearms ownership through a combination of:

1. Categorizing firearms on objective criteria, and grouping weapons on what is essentially a risk basis. So manual-action rifles and shotguns might be category A, semi-auto long guns with fixed magazines and revolvers might be category B, semi-auto weapons with detachable magazines might be category C, and so on.

2. Having a tiered licensing system that gates private access to firearms based on which category they fall into. In a fair number of European countries, the basic firearms license is obtainable basically as long as you're an adult citizen without a criminal history who can pass a basic psychological evaluation. The categories and licenses actually vary a ton between countries. Some are quite permissive (e.g. Czechia, Switzerland) and some are very restrictive (e.g Romania).

In the US it's totally different. There is no license for owning a firearm, there is simply legal eligibility (are you an adult, not a drug addict, not a felon, not convicted of domestic violence, etc). As a US citizen, owning firearms operates on a sort of "benefit of the doubt" system where you have the right to own them by default. That's basically the opposite of every other country.

Also, under federal law there is no legal difference between a single-shot .22 and an AR15. The only category based restriction is that handguns can't be sold to under-21s. The only weapons which are meaninfully treated differently are machine guns, "destructive devices" (explosives, launchers, and certain shotguns for some reason), silencers/suppressors, and "short-barreled" rifles & shotguns (defined as having a barrel length under 16 or 18 inches respectively). The thing is, that even these special categories of firearms do not have any advanced legal requirements for ownership beyond those of normal firearms, but they have to be registered and require additional paperwork and processing time to transfer ownership.

On the state level, there are some laws that introduce a license system, some laws that try to restrict certain categories of firearms or magazines, and other things of that nature. There doesn't seem to be much evidence that state-level gun laws are very effective in reducing gun crime. But across the US you have states with every combination of high/low crime and lax/permissive gun laws. It seems like any meaningful change will have to take place on the federal level.

I think the best thing the US could do for everyone is move to a tiered-license system for all firearms. As a part of this, we could get rid of the arbitrary NFA classifications which might help bring support from the pro-gun side. I think this is ultimately wishful thinking however, because I don't think this kind of system would be allowed under the current interpretation of the 2nd amendment.
Just look at history. The 1930s in europe were like this. You had monarchists, republicans, fascists, communists, every political spectrum represented to its maximal extent with actual organized boots on the ground and people willing to take up arms and die for these causes. Everyone thought the other side was wrong. Things didn't end up getting mended though, people tore eachother apart in world war II and in the years after, and made whatever schools of thought weren't in control of whatever spit of land political exiles, removed or imprisoned or worse.

In the U.S., we didn't make war with eachother, but we hardly "mended" our political misaligmnets from the 1920s and 30s either. In the post war years we simply made talking about communism in the media illegal, blacklisted progressive voices, and ran witchhunts under mccarthyism to root it out of office. Then after mccarthyism, we used the civil rights era and drugs to further alienate political groups from what is legal, proper, and ordained as bonafide american by the ruling class, versus unifying many of these new progressive ideas into our national culture. In later years we divided the labor class into irreconcilable factions, neither of which often thinks critically of the facts of their situation but rather believes the words of their chosen political party leaders as gospel, and never looking back or forward either unless told by said leaders.

If we consider history and our current status, we are at the moment where divisions are being made, and once divided into a group people don't tend to switch groups, they usually die believing that ideology they latch themselves on to. What is next is probably either two things: a period of instability as different groups vie for power (unlikely as the ruling class is unified in its position in the class war above all, and much political commentary is just fodder to distract from the class war), or, radicals will get the hippy treatment, and be pacified by both the conveniences of modern American capitalistic life, as well as the fact that their radical ideology receives no honest voice at all in mass media or wider politics.
Does the government have the right to destroy whatever it wants in the air? Could this club sue for the cost of the balloon?
Either way, Hersh's story is more than simply 'an ISI officer walked in and received cash for the information', and veers directly into the definition of conspiracy theory territory. Which isn't to say it isn't possible, but many parts just don't make sense:

> And there are more contradictions. Why, for example, would the Pakistanis insist on a fake raid that would humiliate their country and the very military and intelligence leaders who supposedly instigated it?

> A simpler question: why would Pakistan bother with the ostentatious fake raid at all, when anyone can imagine a dozen simpler, lower-risk, lower-cost ways to do this?

> Why not just kill bin Laden, drive his body across the border into Afghanistan, and drop him off with the Americans? Or why not put him in a hut somewhere in Waziristan, blow it up with an F-16, pretend it was a US drone strike, and tell the Americans to go collect the body?
Also...I saw regular drug dealing from a house and told police multiple times...no action.

I told my councillor who lives on the same street. They spoke to the community officer about it, they put two CSO's (Police Community Support Officer. Civilians dressed like police, no power of arrest!) in a car to watch the place. A few days later it was raided at 5am by a huge force.

It really matters who you are!
If a balloon flies at an altitude used by commercial aircraft, it should have a transponder similar to commercial aircraft.
The questions are meant to be asked of yourself, unless I'm mistaken. So I'm not really sure what you mean about "the person who asked it".

I would speculate that the point of the question is that "diversity", in the corporate world, has some very specific meaning, and in my experience, it doesn't include these categories. My own employer does a lot of lip service to how important it is to have people from diverse backgrounds, and yet, somehow that seems to translate to "young people from many different ethnic groups who all lean liberal, have never mentioned their faith in the time I've known them, and have degrees".
> (Another common observational joke about inner city bikes is that the value of the locks commonly exceed the value of the bikes they lock.)

Note attached to my uncle's thesis (he's a physics PhD): 'The sum of the weight of bicycle and lock is a constant.'
The new balloons fly extremely high, up to 80K feet, near the edge of space, where planes cannot reach. And planes that can reach, can't slow down enough to reach out and grab an object.
What is it — specifically - you like about the high comp? Is it a sense of feeling personal security, proof of being valued, the desire to be able to buy expensive things on a whim? It may be easier to give up the money if you really identify what it is doing for you and ask yourself if a) you still need it and if so b) if there is a different way you can meet that need.
If it’s a choice between PWA and no app then of course PWA has a use.

But if you think it will upend the industry then that is frankly delusional. PWA apps are worse than native in every single way for the user. Great for developers. Terrible for users.
You should have a plan for network instability or outages that causes a safety stop for anything affected by that fault domain. If uptime is important then you might have two separate networks side-by-side. You can also split a large fault domain into a few smaller networks. There is also the possibility of being clever with how things are wired so that the PHY can be physically cut out of the bus by a watchdog, but that doesn't help with cable faults and introduces its own possibility for failures.

It's also possible to have another set of emergency stop signal wires side by side with the digital communications in case there's an issue.
Would actually be quite impressive if it’s confirmed that NORAD is able to track and target a balloon/payload weighing between 11 grams-6 lbs, and flying between 30k-40k feet altitude.
There is a wide sidewalk that runs under a four-lane road right next to my office. During COVID that underpass became a homeless camp and bike chop shop. When they reopen the office, I could sit and watch out the window as people were bringing bikes down there and was able to watch them take them apart for parts (presumably to sell).

The cops obviously knew of it, as they would visit it regularly.

The cops eventually shut it down and it took the city a couple weeks to fully clean it out of all the refuse that was built up.
> Well. At least they could have. If they really wanted to. Or anybody else.

You're lying here. I guarantee that you, LargoLasskhyfv, do not even have the ability to keep a nationwide database of fingerprints and DNA, and of course you couldn't bear the expense of physically collecting a DNA profile or the fingerprints of everyone in the country no matter how much you "wanted to." Yet, you are a member of "anybody." Are you just an outlier?
Interesting, it's somewhat surprising that he's the one saying this...I still don't get why Google chose to buy AppSheet. There were far better options available for them to buy.

In my opinion, it would have been better for Google to acquire FlutterFlow or something similar instead.
Eh, yeah, I think we are experiencing some slow downs all over the place. Sorry about that? It usually should take about the time of a round trip to the server (plus whatever time Python takes to execute the sum, but that should be fast). Sorry about that!
Why do people keep bringing up the cost of the missile? The cost to run the us military is much more than 1 million dollars per minute.
is there a dimmer available for when these lifted megalumen trucks blind my infant in her rear facing car seat? to hell with these people and the harm their insecurities cause others.
The trouble is, do people upvote because they know the answer is correct and so are thumbing up?

They may have been told something factually incorrect and just thought "neat! Thumbs up!"
Wolfram Language Documentation
http://reference.wolfram.com/

I use it for Mathematica.
Its notebooks are full of editable examples.
Why not? If you run Chrome (or Firefox) on iOS, can't the app ask for notification access using the normal OS API? It will then "lend" this functionality to websites, so that when they have an update you'll get a notification from Chrome saying "Website X: Hello world".
Show HN: Oxen.ai – Fast Unstructured Data Version Control
Hi HN! This is Greg, founder of https://oxen.ai. Oxen at it's core is a version control system built from the ground up optimized for machine learning data. Just like other VCS, Oxen can a building block for a lot of workflows. We are a couple ex-IBM Watson engineers who have seen the waves of AI and know the importance of matching the correct data to the correct model deployment in ML workflows.

The commands are modeled one-for-one after git, but can handle large unstructured datasets of images, videos, audio, text, as well as tabular data.

If you have a few minutes, go to https://github.com/Oxen-AI/oxen-release#-oxen and check it out!

Built in Rust, with modern hashing algorithms and network protocols, it can index hundreds of thousands of images, video, audio, text, in seconds.

The vision is to help collaboration on data be as easy as collaboration on code. It still feels like we are in the dark ages of iterating on machine learning datasets, downloading zip files, dumping on s3, or using legacy technology like git-lfs.

We would also love to see a community grow around open source datasets, just like open source code. There is a web hub at https://www.oxen.ai where you can sign up for free.

Let us know what data you are training your models on today! Running models without the proper dataset infrastructure to iterate on can take the "learn" out of machine learning. With Oxen, we help close that loop.
I was driving behind a Tesla which I can only assume was on FSD mode down a narrow side street coming up to a turn to a busy intersection. The car/driver almost drove straight into cross traffic, ended up blocking a lane without moving for like 15 seconds before it turned right (while signalling left) and almost crashed again into the oncoming traffic coming the other way. Seriously unsafe
The word "assertive" does not appear in the comments but this recall is about the "Assertive" FSD profile, which speeds and runs stop signs. It is not a defect it is a design flaw.
A lot of people say they’re significantly better than average driver. It’s such a stereotypical thing to say, that it probably has negative truth value on average, since it reflects broad personal confidence more than actual driving skill.

You still sound like you’re trying to present the weakest possible straw man for Tesla critics to attack. Stop this bad faith attempt to make Tesla look bad; you’re dragging down the discourse. Nobody is going to take your bait and feed you the expected counter arguments to the nonsense you expressed up-thread.