skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I wish it was, as well.

What should I be doing?
No, fuck all these takes. Every crypto bro has spent the past decade screaming about crypto being free of regulation and going to overturn the dollar as the most important currency and explicitly that regulation of money in the US is THE problem that caused 2008 and every sadness since the 70s.

You do NOT get to turn around now and get bailed out by my tax dollars. You got exactly what you wanted, and everyone told you this is exactly what would happen. Deal with the consequences of ignoring good advice.

Nobody in crypto was investing, they were gambling.
> Something went wrong over the years. They're weirdly resistant to decay.

(Nobody expected the research advances in plant physiology, he, he)

Applacadabra! Poof! Flavor will vanish now by invoking the power of science but your beauty will last forever! Take that, snow white's witch!

https://www.agrofresh.com/solutions/harvista/

Yup, we can delay aging in apples and is standard since many decades ago
Treating multi-user separation as unimportant or unworthy of consideration is a Windows-centric view. It's common, just as Windows is common,
A.I. SUMMARY OF U.S. IMPORT AND EXPORT PRICE INDEXES – JANUARY 2023
Three months ago I had made exactly similar comment, it felt nice to me to see the same thought echoed!

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33845045
Data traffic without consent is bad.
Or he feels like Apple has a much larger moat than TSMC. At the end of the day, TSMC is a very expensive contract manufacturer. Nothing more.
You can always have a vanilla Debian or vanilla Arch install and add things on an as-needed basis and build the OS from scratch, minimizing complexity and have them as single-duty OSes.
Even today, Open BSD use FFS.
You can mount ext2/3/4 and FAT but pretty sure only FFS is supported for the root file system.
> The security of a program is a function of its own design and testing, as well as the design, testing, and basic correctness of its underlying platform: everything from the userspace, to the kernel, to the compilers themselves.

You don't even have to worry about bugs. There are many cryptography primitives that require constant-time to guarantee security. That means that the latency of each machine code instruction could be vital to security. The latency of instructions between vendors within the same architecture is already a concern.
We were in the midst of a terrible pandemic. It was a monumental attempt (really, dozens of them globally), and I can't blame anyone for trying.

But we've been trying to vaccinate against these infrequent pandemics for a long time, and it hasn't worked.
Roblox Is Bringing Generative AI to Its Gaming Universe
Well, I had some difficulties writing a tiny init program for a container because process and signal handling are currently in a pretty weird place in Rust.
1. Subsidize low costs with venture capital and take on a ton of customers at a loss
2. Lock those customers into your API somehow. Enough code is effectively lock in for a while.
3. Change your pricing to be profitable.
4. Hopefully get acquired before all your customers leave
Subscribing for updates :)

Will you be talking about this work openly somewhere?
Vector databases in general are good for storing large amounts of unstructured data by first converting them into embeddings via ML models. There's also feature stores, which store and organize features for later use in model training or predictive analytics. Feature stores generally come in _before_ models get trained, while vector databases generally come _after_ (i.e. they use trained models).

Milvus (https://milvus.io) and Feast (https://feast.dev/) are two of the most well known vector databases and feature stores, respectively.
Again, if we are discussing Anne Hathaway's dating life the fact that you chose to swipe left instead of pursing it, and why, is indeed relevant to the discussion. Is not a discussion I'm interested in having, but I'm sure you can find someone out there who is.

This thread is discussing Amazon's employment practices. The fact that someone refuses to consider employment at Amazon due to those practices is on topic. Your assumption that they don't understand what it takes to be hired by Amazon is insulting and uncalled for.
Not really, just do a rolling deployment like you should be doing anyway. No one cares if the new version takes 1 millisecond to start up or 3 seconds because they literally won't notice.
Agreed. She didn't necessarily decide to click through 20 small clips of lazy cheerleading. She was probably hoping to find a good hit but is satisfied with useless crap because it's better than being present.
OpenSUSE MicroOS is basically built around the idea of an "immutable" (read disincentivized to change) core while the majority of user space runs in a Podman container.

It was originally developed as an absolute minimal distro for running containers on servers, but the immutable desktop movement led them to develop a desktop user-facing variant.

Other ideas that are very similar: Fedora SilverBlue (very similar, more mature) and VanillaOS (based on Flatpak insteak of Podman/Docker, very new)
The reason why people would like to pick Rust is because of its ergonomic features like sum types, streams and of course the toolchain.

But here is a claim: Most business-level programmers are not ready for dealing with the borrowing and ownership concept. They don't want to care about reference vs. value types. They can't do memory management efficiently, because most of them have never used a language without GC.

With Rust you would need to care more about memory which is not necessary for most use cases in startups.
Being a great manager when your team member goes on maternity leave
Password Meter – A visual assessment of password strengths and weaknesses
Why do you say logistically no? The challenges of distributing the runtime?
Yes but those aren’t single purpose OS’s like the ones described here. These typically come with immutability and a vastly reduced attack surface
Draftkings’ Stock Rocket as Earnings ‘send a powerful message’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_Sta...

VT and NH, with triple the gun ownership of CA, have one half of the CA gun murder rate.

NH and VT are constitutional carry states, with gun laws consistent with the US Constitution. CA is heavily regulated.

How do you account for this?
Why Is the Prevalence of ADHD Increasing?
Because it is due to the war/pandemic effects…
Pro-tip: On Instagram, interact with ads that you don't mind. That way the algo picks those or similar ads which makes a more pleasant experience. For example, now I mostly get ads of nice pictures of watches.
Good question.

- Mirantis (the new maintainers of SwarmKit) have an article on that https://www.mirantis.com/blog/kubernetes-vs-swarm-these-comp...

- A recent list is here: https://github.com/collabnix/dockerswarm#companies-using-doc...

- I sell two Swarm courses on Udemy that are purchased daily and I've noticed more questions on Swarm lately. Not a lot, but more than a few each week.

- My Discord server had enough chatter on Swarm that a few months back we made a #swarm channel and it's now a top-3 channel (12k members) https://devops.fan
Sega employees will receive a 30% salary increase Effective July 1
The issue with TSMC seems to be there is demand for their leading node but not enough demand for their 7nm. Also the cost of build the next bleeding edge node is getting higher and higher and at some point even though Physics of building lets say 0.5 node feasible but the economics wont be there. That means their rivals can catch up with them in 5 year span.. while they remain stagnant.
Wondering if part if this is due to the sky high inflated prices of vehicles nowadays?

Back in the day, my first car was £700, with £400 insurance. It's no where near that now, and this is only 19 years ago.
Yes, all those drives in Utah are just for appearances.
I've really tried to give js/ts in backend a go. Both by nodejs and deno. And by kickstarting my own projects as well as diving into experienced nodejs developers' code.

I really don't see how anyone choses nodejs/deno to anything.

Java imo gives you much less trouble, is more stable, has a working (!!!) Unit testing setup and exceptional runtime.

Next on my list is to give rust a go, since I'm intrigued by its features, but if I was to go fast I'd go with java any day.
For perspective... this is more than some places entire police budget. This feels incredibly inefficient.
On top of this, Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk (2014) found that employers do not need to compensate workers for time spent waiting in line for security screenings. At the time, some workers were spending 2.5hrs/week in lines before and after their shifts.

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-supreme-cou...

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/integrity-staffi...
Disclaimer: I'm just an investment noob.

Could it just be that investing in Apple could be seen as "I get all the upside of any benefits I would get in investing in TSMC, with the additional upside of getting exposure to all of Apple's product decisions in non-chip related markets ( eg financial, content, et al )?" Like, if TSMC invented a new fab process tomorrow that was amazing, that'd be cool, but it'd be unlikely to make a substantial increase in stock prices in its future as that sort of is how TSMC normally behaves. That's their whole business. But Apple has a history of unlocking new markets and adding new cash flows, plus doing a pretty good job maintaining their current cash flows, so you get more upside on Apple, plus a hedged exposure to TSMC?

I say all that with full acknowledgement I'm just like, playing a guessing game at professionals here.
The nuclear bomb option is to change your name to Michael Bolton or some other common or famous name.
How does io_uring relate (if at all) to DPDK and SPDK?
How would real-world JVM startup times matter in deployments?
The traits of good remote leaders
Really depends on what you're doing.

The thing is if you know enough about why cloning is slow - like a really fat string or a tight loop - you probably also know enough to avoid that. At least in my experience.

There's a ton of rope in Rust with lifetimes, generics, etc. Most if not all generic bounds have implications about the user and caller. Choosing which type of methods you use to avoid allocation while prototyping can be exceptionally difficult to do and be correct.

Refcounting is not that bad imo, and is very very easy. The moment you're at "well we need to beat the performance of X" is probably when you can make better/intelligent decisions about how you allocate, whether to use Arena/Bump/etc.

Also, if you wanted to be in Go/C#/etc you just would. You're using Rust (in this discussion) because you wanted to. When performance is a concern, you can deal with it - but the basic allocation tricks (Arc/etc) don't represent such a significant performance loss that suddenly your Prototype no longer functions.
I always thought the advantage of BRK-X was not that they were good investors, per se, but that they chose companies that were struggling or undervalued, brought them into the fold and multiplied their value.

Investing in the company already valued the highest in the market seems odd from the old version of BRK that I thought I understood.
I also used to use rEFInd while I was running macOS/windows dualboot for a short time. I am going back to it from grub now since booting from my zfs root partition with grub has become a hassle.
Aside from apparently excusing evidence destruction, it's not even accurate.

The FBI agent in question was was taking bribes from Oleg Deripaska, not "from Russia". Deripaska paid Trump's campaign manager, Paul Manafort, $10 million dollars and was receiving private briefings and confidential polling data from him. I really don't think it's a point in favor of "the FBI was out to get Trump" when one of the guys investigating the wrong-doing was being paid by one of the campaign's allies.
I've been unjustly smeared a few times over the decades. What I found works for me is to ignore it. If you pay attention to it, you give it more credence. Protesting too much tends to make people think there must be some truth to the smear.

When asked about it, you tell the truth plainly and calmly.

If you have a history of conducting yourself with integrity, that's enough. None of the smears will seriously hurt you because the people who matter know better.
I just use standard CSS 3 Media Queries. Sure there are frameworks and this is all Bootstrap and others are really designed to do. But if you're experienced enough a lot of things are just easier to "do it myself".

It's common to have for example, 2 versions of a button and use CSS breakpoints to hide one on mobile, un-hide a different one for the desktop etc. If you feel like you're re-writing the whole site sometimes you might go back and take a look at what you're really doing. In complex designs this can sometimes be the only real option but thats rare in my experience (if you're using Data Tables all bets are off ).

If you're not yet super experienced in this kind of thing nows a great time to learn it at a fundamental level. If you're just trying to get something done and shipped so to speak, about any predefined CSS ( Bootstrap etc ) is going to get you there faster.

This is a good place to start if you're going the CSS-myself route:

https://www.w3schools.com/howto/howto_css_media_query_breakp...
Everything is equal when everyone slows down and does less with no expectations.
I've never heard of it with the phrase

> shareholder class

at the end of it. But make no mistake, every discussion I've had as been "how will this make us money, and will that impact the stock price" -- which has an implication.

Cuz retail investors don't count for much w/r/t stock ownership.

Plus Milton Friedman's "companies exist only to generate profits for shareholders" has been a mantra since I went to Uni in the 80s.
Sequoia backs open source data-validation framework Pydantic
In accordance with prophecy, sadly. People really don't realise to what degree deletion (or rather de-ranking) is a tool of the powerful, not a boon for the weak.
Yes. It's a reason people pick Go and Rust for things.
There's additional info on the company announcement: https://pydantic.dev/announcement/
Given my downvotes you seem to be with the consensus on this one. I had 30 years of c++ development going into rust and I never found myself fighting the borrow checker. Golang seemed the same, just started coding and stuff worked mostly. But, the complexity of rust was familar coming from c++ with generics and macros but without some of the footguns, so it just seemed like power, not clutter.

I like go, but I wouldn't prototype in it, I'd pick julia or python. And if I'm familiar with the problem and want to code for production, rust really doesn't seem any slower to develop in than go to me and perhaps a bit less verbose. But in retrospect I think that is because of the direction I came at rust from means my habitual coding style lined up more closely with what rust expects. Its not a harder coding mindset, just a different one than someone who came from java would be used to.
Every Playstation VR2 Launch Game
Once again, I'm not involved in any way, so my opinion is irrelevant.

But sure: I don't know Italian slang. However, a project that conducts both itself and its examples in English not being comprehensive about possible meanings in other languages isn't exactly a gotcha. Furthermore, the example is suggesting that you don't pick at random, but instead something that is obviously not a word, like 0x12345678. It's not suggesting that you make something up.

Furthermore, this isn't something about trying to be "absolutely pure" or something. It's a helpful lint to catch common cases. Nothing more, nothing less.
Did you check the Vonnegut writing rules example I posted at top of this thread - in particular look at Bing/GPT's explanation of how its cake story matches up to Vonnegut's rules ? It's hard to imagine how it could have come up with such a coherent story, checking all the rules, if it was only conceiving of it's continuing story on a word by word basis. It's not as if sentence #1 matches rule number 1, sentence 2 matches rule number 2, etc. It seems there had to be some wholistic composition for it to do that.

Note too that despite the output being sampled from a distribution based on a "randomness" temperature, there are many case where what it is trying to say so much constrains the output that certain words/synonyms/concepts are all but forced.
Emotions garner attachment. Negative emotions even more so.
Kagi has a search API. Currently 2.5 cents per search but it is high quality and we will look to bring the price down.

https://help.kagi.com/kagi/search-api/overview.html
I think if you've captured the essence of the discussion on the usability of Rust really well.
They used to be low-cost _and_ open source. Now they're source available and not interested in anything but big clients. I was using Mapbox for all my clients before their unopen sourcing, and I tried reaching out three times to ask about options for one of my clients. It wouldn't have been a huge amount of money, probably a few hundred per month, but they never, ever reply. That client wasn't even using any of their server resources, they are 100% self hosted, it's just that Mapbox now charges even for using their client. Anyways, I was trying to give them money, and they wouldn't even acknowledge I exist. I switched that client over to Maplibre and never looked back.

The other thing that annoys me is that they've more or less abandoned all their open source repos without even as much of a notice in the README. All these amazing tools sitting there with open pull requests and no one responding for years. If they just did a clean break, put a notice on everything they weren't going to touch again, it would have been a lot better/easier for the community to fork and move on with their lives.
Mirai botnet variant V3G4 targeting 13 unpatched IoT vulnerabilities
Hey, Al from Tinybird here (co-author of the post). We've made up to 20 production releases per day some days. It's transparent to our users, they aren't even aware the upgrade is happening, there's no upgrade button to hit, there's no downtime. We release often because we release small and fast. It's not like those 20 releases are always fundamentally changing the product. We would rather fix a minor bug or two and get that out to our customers ASAP, than hold on to it for a few months and drop a huge change. In a vast majority of cases, a user won't even consciously notice something changed.

Doing this kind of fast iteration has its risks, but it has its benefits too. We de-risk it, in part, by having extensive CI, which is why it was so important to us that the CI is fast & reliable.

Delivering larger, less-frequent updates has its own risks. You're not practising your release process as frequently, so it's a much bigger event. You're pushing many, many more changes in one go, so there's a lot more surface area for something to go wrong, and rolling it back is a much bigger job. And dropping many/bigger changes to the user experience is much more noticeable.

Again, this isn't the right process for everyone, but it works for us and its how we've managed to build a product that delivers value to our users.
The rationale behind why minorities were treated different was that the majority expected the minority to behave different.

Most of the racist nonsense online today is still based on that rationale.
Yup. I wrote (in another comment) about the emergent behaviors that would come from that idea, and hiring discrimination is one of them.

At the same time (and I say this not as a point of argument, but as thinking through the thought experiment), I wonder if there should be some sort of legislative action to discourage the societal and environmental burden of these company policies.

For example, I assume that causing numerous people to commute multiple hours each day has some environmental cost. I also assume that there may be some economy of scale that benefits a centralized work force (heating and cooling one building rather than individual homes during the work day). Perhaps the electricity use for computers is better or worse. I don't know.

I'm a libertarian in philosophy, and I ultimately believe that people should be allowed to make their own choices about their own life. I also see the injustice, then, of treating corporations as people, which allows the one person who controls the corporation to have more power and influence than the person who does not own a corporation. It is the essence of "some people are more equal than others" from Animal Farm.

Again, ultimately, it is a thought experiment.

But, I can tell you, that I WFH. Next week, my employer has asked me to come in for a certain meeting, and it is a 2.5 hour commute each way. I get to count the drive as part of my work day. They don't need me to drive in very often. I like this arrangement.
That’s because it’s less expensive than specialized care facilities.
> By "succeeded", do you mean something like "well liked by other contemporary artists" or "made money"?

The definition of success was "earned a living wage" but some were much more successful than that. I was thinking about this particular issue recently because a good friend, one who falls squarely into the "should have quit" category, has recently become homeless.

> Was it clear to you or even to most people? In what way was it clear, why? I'd expect the ones with more business acumen to "make it" as artists.

It was clear to most people. The best way I've seen the feeling described is the scene from The Sopranos when Hesh says: "There's good and there's not good ... Talent is talent ... a hit is a hit" [0]. The point is, you can recognize talent, but that doesn't mean you can necessarily articulate what makes it good. There is something tautological about taste: it's good because it's good.

> I don't know about neutral observers. Successful artists often make kitch that sells. Would you say Vincent van Gogh failed in his artistic pursuits?

Most people aren't Vincent van Gogh.

0: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sSIE-o2V9g
Especially at AWS where you have bays of people with door desks, it can get very loud and distracting in the office!
Yeesh. Sad that people seem so determined to prove that you can't have nice things. Hopefully you don't get too discouraged. Happy though that you let my registration through. Kind of expected that my habit of using random usernames would get me flagged.

Site looks great, btw.
But the law could be changed. Or unions could negotiate those policies.
The rebuttal makes some good points. However, many are not going to see the contents of flagged comments nor understand the decisions behind them being so. Not to say that flagging isn't justified at times, but scores of posts that are removed with it, are not guilty of the same violation or the posters below the removed comment in violation may not even know what happened.

Agree that the OP should be able to provide a link to the shadowbanned thread (if they're not having trouble doing so), because of course you will be able to see it. The context of how shadowban or ghostban is used, is debatably valid. Because the user can see the thread, but it's no longer obviously available to the public.

As for showdead, seems doubtful that many would have it turned on or even be looking. Once a thread drops out of sight (likely top 100), seems most won't check (even more so if no comments) unless they are searching for something specific (which could be anything).

Possibly a good example of shadowban/ghostban thread, is this recently posted one (below). It also doesn't show as "dead" either, though maybe there is some time element, and can't be seen by the public.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34838236
(Robot war dogs commanded by soldiers using brain computer interface [video])