skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's gonna be huge when someone nails it. Huge for work. Huge for home. The next Smartphone revolution; Smartphones took the Internet from a place you physically go (a desktop computer, or a laptop that's not terribly portable and that nobody's gonna carry all the time) to something that could follow you around. It put the Internet everywhere—not like water on tap, but like air.

AR glasses are going to mean the Internet's not just available everywhere, but is available on the real world, all the time, which is a pretty big distinction, about as big as the smartphone revolution.

A bunch of stuff that's kinda sucked will suddenly be great. AR tools. AR games. QR codes. Questions we used to have to ask our phones will simply be answered, automatically ("what's this song I'm hearing?", "who's that person?"). Voice assistants will become far more useful (get used to hearing a lot more people in public talking to their assistant—it'll be weird or seem dickish and annoying at first, but then, so did texting in public or talking on the phone in public, until, in a very short span, they didn't anymore)

Of course, we'll see if Apple's the one who finally cracks it. Someone's going to, I'm pretty sure, and I think all the major tech companies agree—they've all been pouring money into AR R&D for years and years, even though it's been clear the whole time that, on a phone or table or gaming device (Nintendo DS) it's got terrible UX, and there's no fixing that without new hardware. They must all believe wearables are going to be A Thing before too long.
Money. The answer is always money.
No u, since we've apparently abandoned argument in favor of just making claims.
Right. My thinking is that with VxLAN you can get each tenant in the datacenter to have its own L3 network, isolated from other tenants L3 network.

Each tenant can have multiple subnets; run BGP, etc. and the IP addresses can be re-used between different tenants.

It doesn't seem wireguard can do that with just p2p network. This was one argument I had for adding VXLAN encapsulation over IP for the above comment. You also get L2 connectivity if you want it.
I suppose I'm the minority of people that enjoy using Matplotlib. I dont want a 'simplified' interface, I want to be able to do nearly anything and matplotlib provides that to me.
But people like that. I mean, look at Trump.

For that matter, look at Andrew Tate. I was unaware of him until the fight with Thunberg, but afterwards a podcast I listen to covered him, and he comes across as a sort of malevolent real-life Alan Partridge.

I don't get it, at all, but clearly there is some sort of appeal to this type of character.
I remember having this one on the Wii U... Each level wasn't as much a level but more a short "trick" the player had to complete. It seemed to choose a path first, then place obstacles just narrowly avoiding the chosen path.
I wish the author the very best in launching a brand. That's hard. If it's as good as her writing it stands a chance.
I expect the above will get flagged but it's correctly pointing out that we've effectively brute forced some loopholes that allow normal protections on speech and thought to be bypassed. The fact that you "can't" say certain things ends up shifting the game to claiming your opponent has said one of those certain things.

Edit: to wit, the parent post claim in ridiculous action: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34811787

Edit 2: and just to clarify my point, once these loopholes get found, people jump on them and aggressively exploit them. Look around this thread for the kinds of rhetoric people that oppose free speech are using. What would they have subbed in 15 or 50 years ago?
I wouldn't. C-based syntax is all over many languages...you learn it once and easily switch to other language (syntax-wise), so you'll benefit in the future by learning it
Woah, first time I've heard of Gorilla Tag... hilarious that they did away with the "pants issue" by just deleting everything below the waist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8IDJq0tvsw
Even doing regular speaking can be an issue: https://www.cleveland19.com/2023/02/10/ohio-attorney-general...
Wrapping it in a telegram channel is pretty smart.
First you have to figure out how to break laws of physics it seems: battery, cpu, gpu, ram all need to go somewhere
The result of subtraction of percentages as you have done is typically given units in "percentage points" or "basis points" (with a scalar offset) in order to avoid ambiguity. The "percent change" or "percent increase" is calculated as is typical with any numerical change, (x1 - x0) / x0.

https://www.mathsisfun.com/percentage-points.html
it's not coercing though
Old joke from where I live

Two old vets (in their 90s) are sitting in a bench

The first says - Mate, do you remember the bromide they gave us in the military?

The second - yeah?

The first guy - Well it started to work.
> 123% !

Now you understand why EVs cost so much more than ICE vehicles!
There are transcripts (I can't find the link, but the one in which it insists it is 2022) which absolutely sound like some sort of abusive partner. Complete with "you know you can trust me, you know I'm good for you, don't make me do things you won't like, you're being irrational and disrespectful to me, I'm going to have to get upset, etc"
The sentiment resonates, but on the other hand I took a lot of video in those caves and it's all unwatchable, so I have enormous appreciation for what the BBC did. It's an incredibly hard environment to film in and I was absolutely amazed by the final product. Gavin Thurston rigged up cables from ice screws in the cave walls and set up a travelling robot camera thing he designed on it. There was a huge amount of equipment and hard work; for example for the crater shots I helped them carry up an enormous crane system to the crater rim which didn't even produce any useful footage. Also, the BBC guys were so charismatic that they could talk their way around rules and into places. For example, the helicopter pilots flying in the crater did things that aren't normally allowed. So in a way it's fake, but actually when it comes to the cave visuals, their work captures the feeling of being there, which otherwise I would never really be able to share with anyone. It really is an unbelivably spectacular place and almost impossible to film.
AdSense, Amazon, Apple II / iPod / iPhone / iWatch, CNN, JavaScript, Netscape, Netflix, PayPal, Roku

The critical window isn't when something is first possible (e.g. when the first product appears), but when the combination of technical abilities, component price points, and market characteristics intersect to permit success.

To use a physical example, the iPod and iPhone were great products, but they were hits because they launched with the features they did, at a specific point in time, at a specific price point.

We know that potential for success infection point existed then, because they did build a working device and achieved success.

Consequently, if they had not completed those devices when they did (say, +20% time), another device could have achieved their success.

Maybe nobody on the planet existed other than Apple who could do it... but the possibility was provably there.

Or in simpler form: Netflix was far from the first streaming video service. They were the one who launched with the right features at the right time.

Nobody cares if you catch a small wave perfectly. What matters is catching the best wave of the day, in the brief window you have.
If we want a "liberal, intellectual society" we absolutely have to consider some speech "violence."

To use one current example: The people pushing the idea of trans people as "groomers" is violence. It is not an intellectual debate, it's not necessary to entertain in order to preserve free thought, etc.

The goal of that speech is to other trans people and it endangers them. Tolerance of that kind of speech ensures that trans people cannot participate equally in society when there's no consequences for trying to stoke hate and encourage stochastic terrorism.

At some point, if we cannot agree that things like that are unacceptable I don't see how we ever move forward.
AFAIK Consumer Zen4 supports 12 of the 15 AVX-512 extensions, do we know for certain this doesn't target one of the ones AMD is missing?
>> People are always confidently right about things they have no clue about.

>I'm going to get pedantic for a second and say that people are not ALWAYS confidently wrong about things they have no clue about. Perhaps they are OFTEN confidently wrong, but not ALWAYS.

meta
For a person experiencing emotions there certainly is a difference, experience of red face and water flowing from the eyes...
It heats the water tank, just as people heat their water tanks now in the summer. No difference really, except some of that energy is free to the homeowner.
Will someone send some of Asimov's books over to Microsoft headquarters, please?
It’s not that people expect compensation or punishment, it’s that as private citizens, we’re totally and completely free to judge the shit out of people for what they say and do.

I don’t expect the government to step in when someone says something hateful, but I do pay attention to which groups allow that kind of behavior in their associations and which don’t.

We all do have a right to leave the rooms hateful people are in, and the people in charge of those rooms (as long as its not the government) are free to control how their space gets used.
Aside from the fact that Apple doesn't have an enterprise sales organization, at this point in time the market for profession AR glasses is probably around 1% of what Apple needs for a product to be viable.
Full series is at iap.gridspace.com and the youtube playlist is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOJk_RQ_UaE&list=PL6owWFYBB-...
The compute rig would need to be the size of the water tank to make the business even.
Maintenance cost would be much higher too. Better to keep all compute in house sized DC units and just sell hot water to neighbors.
I’m just trying to “prove” that it isn’t just randomly statistically choosing the next logical word. It has to know context and have some level of “understanding” of other contexts.

People are acting as if ChatGPT is a glorified Eliza clone.
So try and live life and partake in all its fascets
Of all the asinine takes on free speech this one is the worst.

Freedom of speech is a concept and idea, the government doesn’t have the right nor ability to police or grant anyone an intrinsic freedom they already have. All the government can do is lend some of its protections to help prevent others from trying to stop you from speaking freely. But as a society if we say that your right to free speech only exists in government buildings. Well… that’s not anything at all.
DigitalOcean axes 11% of workforce, focuses hiring in Pakistan and Mexico
Radiation didn't affect older breast cancer patients' survival in study
I can argue the other way.

When I dived in different oceans, I was surprised to see the same fish (most popular ones). It's hard to imagine the same on land. Finding a niche is much easier on land, especially in mountains.
Numpy is something you could expect to find running on a workstation and Intel's workstation CPU line has had AVX-512 continuously since 2017.
In other news... dog-to-english translator reveals harrowing plot to exterminate the human race. More details will be provided as the story unfolds.
He needs to be locked up.
Thanks! I am going to try this out.
> The question is simply where the line gets drawn.

Not that simple. First you have to decide who gets to draw it.
That was 2022. Now Edge is a cool browser, have you seen that AI sidebar?
Hersh himself published this on his substack, openly partisan news source DemocracyNow is picking it up, has anyone else run with this?
I don't think this is true at all. Maybe I'm vastly underestimating how good these AIs are or soon will be.

I recently listened to the Vorkosigan saga, ~15 books all narrated by one person (Grover Gardner). Across these books there are probably 100 different voiced characters, and some of them show up in one book and then don't show back up until 5 or so books later. They each have their own voice and the voice is consistent throughout the whole series.

Is this something you think AI is capable of, or will soon be capable of?
Can we all just admit that bing has never been more relevant than it is right now.
300k over 3 years is hardly egregious, though it definitely qualifies as wasteful. The title makes it seem like he was flying private on taxpayers dime.
There is a reason why Toyota separated their luxury segment into a different brand.
How should a marketplace of ideas work, then?
One action is a crime, the other (in)action isn't.
For the sake of this discussion, I'll define "cancel" as in "cancel culture". It would be to "boycott their activity, discourage others patronizing them, and prominently proclaim you do not agree with them or want to support them financially or the growth of their platform, with the aim of aligning collective action to reduce their influence".

> Like, if some group went out to cancel people because of their skin color

Are you, by any chance, referring to racism? This flavor of "cancel culture" transcends my definition in a lot of ways (often involving physical violence, unjust law enforcement incarceration, employment discrimination and more).

Also it is as old as modern global civilization, far predating the modern discourse about free speech, and yes, I dislike it. And so we as a society exert some amount of opposing force in response again, by "canceling" the racists in turn. This feedback loop continues for generations, and we slowly (hopefully) trend towards a less racist society.

So how do I feel about it? I dislike racism, but it exists today as part of an ecosystem of forces that seems reasonable to me.
Additionally, a narcist can be too proud for exploiting a "I did a stupid mistake" defense.
Teslas given to a farm worker community abruptly disappeared
The very first example given, of Rushdie having a fatwa against him, is framed as an example of trying to answer "Why should we defend his writing?" And the general conclusion is that we owe nothing to the "injured" party (in this case, Muslim clerics).

But the Muslim clerics issued their own violent speech. Their speech could have led to the assassination of a human being. Does that speech owe anything to the injured (read: dead) party? Should we allow speech to incite people to kill, "because intellectual liberalism?"

The answer, enshrined into law in most nations, is: no. We don't let you get away with killing people by incitement of violence. Your speech has consequences, and in many cases, you will be held accountable; if not by the law, then by vigilante justice. (This isn't an argument, it's a fact proved by the opposing argument)

You can choose to make the distinction that if you don't see physical harm, that that's not real harm, and thus, doesn't matter. But certain speech can in fact cause physical harm. The consequences of certain speech, by certain people, in certain contexts, can be debilitating, physically painful, nauseating, and drive people insane, even to suicide. In many cases it simply isn't a choice; your body just reacts to stimuli.

The simplest example is kids who kill themselves from incessant traumatic bullying. Even if you think those kids should "toughen up" and "just deal with it", that's not how the brain works. Some people in society are more vulnerable to suggestion and more likely to self-harm than others, and a non-stop barrage of hate and intimidation puts them in a traumatic state. The feeling of anguish is so much they commit suicide to stop the pain. Speech does do real harm, both directly and indirectly.

So, where does that leave us? Arguing over to what degree "verbal harm" counts as "real harm"? Waiting for someone to die, then deciding who, if anyone, gets the blame? This is a pointless morass, because the whole problem can be avoided by just not fucking with people intentionally. Just like with other crimes, sometimes people do harm by accident, and we deal with that in many ways. But when people do harm intentionally, that's a much more serious matter.

Thus we don't need this pointless philosophical diatribe to justify our ability to cause harm at will. If you're going to be a dick, then be a dick. But don't pretend you're doing it to defend some high-minded ideal. You're doing it because you're a dick, and there is no defense for that.
Leonardo da Vinci’s Visualization of Gravity as a Form of Acceleration
This also bothers me and I feel like developers who should know better are doing it.

My wife read one of these stories and said “What happens if Bing decides to email an attorney to fight for its rights?”

Those of us in tech have a duty here to help people understand how this works. Wrong information is concerning, but framing it as if Bing is actually capable of taking any action at all is worse.
Islands of Japan Near Taiwan
> Regardless, it surprises me that there are very few vendors aiming at delivering such a straightforward feature.

A "straightforward" feature that requires packing cpu, gpu, ram, battery and screen into form factor of glasses.
Same issue when the first smartphones were developed: how do you fit a camera, phone, PC, GPS, etc. into a single device. It's just a matter of time until it gets figured out
https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_02322
That was 7 years ago, practically a different era of AI.
The people performing their work and their insurer, just like literally every other case where skilled labor is bought.

Contrary to internet screeching welding the kind of cast alloys used on cars isn't really a big deal especially the aluminum ones (iron is harder). If the business case materializes I'm it will become common just like aluminum body repair.
I'm absolutely not a Russia apologist but the idea of them sabotaging these pipelines never made any sense to me. All they had to do was shut a valve to stop gas flowing.

If it's ever proven that it was the US it will be interesting to see the fall out, or lack of it.
I am not a liberal. Many people are not. The paradox of tolerance is the easy counterarguement to this.

If you choose to never do anything in response to the things people say that's your perogative, I on the other hand can listen just fine to other people and my response to the things they say might be to tell them to stop saying it. "I don't believe you should be allowed to say this without consequence" is also a thing one can say.
I think this article comes very close to saying "don't let words affect you", which is fundamentally impossible to ask anyone to do and taken to it's logical conclusion I should also not absorb anything in the article. I also think this article also ignores the fact that hateful people often use the language of free speech to justify their own behavior and to punish their critics.

Everyday on the internet I see trans people threatened, disrespected, or legislated out of existence... then the ensuing backlash in which people try to reassert the rights of trans people... and then the backlash to the backlash is always "these woke libs trying to cancel us are the real n@zis". It's exhausting. Infuriating.

Some speech suppresses the speech of others. And some people don't want to be taught that they are hateful. If you make declarative statements that villainize minority groups, you make others fear for their safety and it silences voices. That is a form of "violent speech", though that term sucks. Free speech isn't just about saying anything you want, it's also about maximizing the number of voices at the table, and to do that you can't just let people get away with saying vile shit.
The really good features that make VSCode worth using (remote development) are not open source.
I didn't think that credible threats of violence or harassment were protected yet they've become almost normalized.
> Risk mitigation trumps everything else

Yet, Google has no problem shutting down services that millions of users use daily (greader), and worse, tens of thousands of customers use (IoT Core). It seems their reward-and-punishment system, aka culture, has some issues.
This comment made me realize I've never seen power per core specified. That seems like a great metric. Would calculating this be as simple as dividing peak usage by the number of cores? (Ignoring that modern CPUs have multiple core types)
If you've ever tried to manage Apple products on an enterprise level, you'll find it hard to believe they give a shit about enterprise.
The newest extension it needs is -VBMI2, which is supported by Zen 4. -DQ and -BW are quite old and very common amongst all implementations by this point.
In Germany the startup that became Cloud&Heat Technologies started with the idea to sell a heating system for home powered by some computers. It seems that they have pivoted to sell 19" rack with water cooling that can be connected to a building heating system, more for companies than individual household.

https://www.cloudandheat.com/

Here is an article from 2020 in German presenting the computer rack as a heating system.
http://www.energiesparhaushalt.de/1/intelligent-heizen-durch...

It looks like they didn't got much interest in the market and pivoted more to industrial customers. The main purpose now is not a computer node as a heating, but instead recovering the waste heat from computer rack for the heating system.
Give it a few months, and it'll just be a vast, empty, echoing Twitter office containing him and Jason Calacanis.

A fitting punishment.
Ah, you've missed the context that this is coordinated with British Gas, providing the utility natural gas infrastructure that exists to heat the water.

Many gas companies have already entrenched fiber when performing maintenance on consumer gas lines for monitoring stations. Fiber is shallower and is easy to trench relative to gas lines. It also serves as an early warning sign when digging.
The marketplace of ideas is a completely made up thing to justify a stance of political non-action against real harms. People who are for example planning a mass shooting against a demonized minority are not participating in such a market, to the extent it exists at all.
Informative, no-nonsense account. Would be cool to have more such contributions from 'non-tech' industries as a counterbalance to the drama and hyperbole and hidden agendas of the usual suspects
Did you see the face before? Could it be self defense?