skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You can't really call it a marketplace of ideas, then, if your response is [metaphorically] a SLAPP. E.g. people weren't just critical of Justine Sacco, they tried to destroy her. Tell me again who the bad guys are?
I'm super curious what the target audience will be.

I really not seeing the writing for a mixed reality headset on the wall at all.
MBP is the only computer I can run intense workloads at high performance while it remains completely silent. I’ve been waiting for such a machine for a long time. When intel can match that they’ll have my attention.
New to programming/OOP – Should I start with Smalltalk?
New programmer here and I want to learn and get a better grasp of OOP - and I read smalltalk can be good for that? Personally, I would do OOP in C# and Java but their syntax is scaring me right now lol

Do you think I should go towards smalltalk just to learn OOP concepts - Although I do know industry wise not many are using it professionally.
Like most privacy policies (I'm certainly not saying Google is unique here), they include phrases such as:

> We collect information to provide better services to all our users

Which is vague to the point of uselessness. Google could argue that pretty much any purpose they put that information to is to provide better services to all their users.

This sort of thing is why I ignore privacy policies. They tend to have quite a lot of verbiage of that sort. Even when they appear to solidly say they won't do something, often there's wording elsewhere that provides an exception.

The only way I'd put any stock in a privacy policy is if I have my attorney review it and explain to me what it really says (not being a lawyer, I am not capable of adequately interpreting contracts). Since it's entirely unrealistic to have an attorney review every privacy policy, the safest approach is to assume that they allow the company to do whatever they wish in the end.

And that's all assuming that companies put any real effort to adhering to their privacy policies.
The equivalent Intel laptop is at 220W for both CPU and GPU in the same scenario.

So no 10x, but clearly 2.5x.
If this isn't fake, this could be trouble. Imagine trying to argue something with an AI.
Thanks - appreciate the reply ! Will keep you guys in mind in the future. Translating it into real terms, at an early (early) stage bootstrapped, $2500USD/month = $48'000NZD per annum which is about 1/3 of a good full stack salary in New Zealand.

I can certainly see in future when we're a bit bigger it might be interesting and having a lot more infrastructure to manage - but right now when we've barely (infact only once in past year had an issue) then not quite justifiable.

Like I say, it's that awful middle ground of "can't really justify it, but also would like to be able to switch off!" I'll reach out to stay in touch for future.
I found this bit from networkworld.com:
"In the server market, AMD's total market share grew from 10.7% at the start of 2022 to 17.6% at the end of the year, while Intel fell from 89.3% at the start of the year to 82.4%. Interestingly, the server chips that are selling the most aren't the newest and greatest models"
Hard to tell what calculations are being used to derive the percentages. Maybe they are using dollar amounts per total spending on all chips, and server chips cost more, therefore driving the market share numbers?
I'd go with WD over Seagate every time (for spinning).
I've been told that not only is my speech violence, but so is my silence.
> solution without a problem

If it had been out three years ago, we’d have 10M blissful zoom schoolers by now.
The complex behavior you're showing doesn't prove what you think it proves - it still doesn't show it's using the consistent rules that a person would expect.

But it does show that people extrapolate complex behavior to "understanding" in the way humans do, which machines generally don't.
Apple Reportedly Planning to Limit iPhone 15 USB-C Port in Same Way as Lightning
The point is LLMs are not effective at “hacking” in any “obtaining unauthorized access to computer systems” sense.

They can regurgitate information about “hacking”, same as a library, but pointing an LLM at a server will achieve worse results than many existing specialized tools for vulnerability scanning and exploitation.

So as I said, the risks are overblown due to a misunderstanding.
Sorry, can you expand? I'm not sure what you meant by "this term": free speech? And which two groups: offensive vs abusive speech? Which distinction?
I found this comment to be the "Aha" moment for me.

What's the point of arguments as to whether this is sentient or not? After all, if it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck...
What a story!

It's hard to make OSS sustainable without millions of $ and VCs trying to turn that OSS tech in a huge business. With OrientDB we got lucky, not it's the past... Now I'm experimenting with a different approach of redistributing GitHub Sponsorships to the developers that actively work to the project:

https://blog.arcadedb.com/welcome-to-arcadedb#whats-next

After almost 18 months it's still far from being sustainable. Pure OSS is one of the hardest field to make some money because of the average developer: they just take without giving anything back in terms of work (contributing) or money.
Another thinkpiece positing that facing consequences for saying fucked up shit is somehow a bad thing.

How many of these must we suffer through? Why do none of these people grasp the concept that when you speak to other people, they do not have to passively absorb your words?

This author, like many others, could use the sage advice my father gave me in 5th grade when I taunted and made fun of another student and got beat up for it: "Don't let your mouth write checks your ass can't cash."
So it's legal, but you're definitely the Bad Guy.
But if EVERY person had an EV it would have had problems.

And what if you were one of the unfortunate people who lost power for 5 days and had an EV? If it wasn't charged enough to go to a charging station that might have power...what do you do?

I am honestly curious: how in the world did gas pumps freeze? Are gas pumps actually built differently in the north?
Balthazar: A Personal Computing Device
> Hard disagree. GP comment was extremely useful to me, and I want this usage to continue.

And why do you believe that comment to be correct in any way shape or form?

Does it actually reflect the article? Did it get something subtly wrong? Or maybe it's completely wrong?

You'll have to pull up the article to answer those questions anyway, so why add this noise?
You can convince someone to go shoot up a school, good luck arguing convincing is not coercing in court.
It was my mistake holding HN to a higher standard than the most uncharitable interpretation of a comment.

I didn't fault a user for searching with a search engine, I'm questioning why a search engine is pigeonholing ChatGPT into being search interface.

But I guess if you're the kind of person prone to low value commentary like "why'd you search using a search engine?!" you might project it onto others...
I'm fine with saying "the abyss of rent-seeking" even when rent-seeking behavior by corporations makes them a lot of money.
From FTX chief regulatory officer Daniel Friedberg's objection [1], FTX head of counsel Ryne Miller manipulated the bankruptcy proceedings and channeled its exorbitantly expensive legal work to Sullivan & Cromwell, ostensibly so he can return as a partner after this fiasco is over.

> Mr. Miller told me that the bankruptcy filings of FTX
International Group, the Alameda Group, and the FTX.US Group had to be in the
United States because otherwise S&C couldn’t do the job. (35, p. 8)

> Mr. Miller stated that he needed to include FTX.US as part of the bankruptcy because FTX.US had the cash to pay S&C its retainer. Without this retainer from FTX.US, S&C wouldn’t file. I told him that it wasn’t proper for FTX.US to pay for the expenses of the bankruptcy of FTX International Group or the Alameda Group.

[1] johnreedstark.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/180/2023/01/FriedbergObjection.pdf
If you can get hold of one. The one at our hospital was on holiday. We got so much different conflicting advice and brusque indifferent visits. We wanted to breastfeed to help the baby's microbiome because raised infection markers sparked a precautionary round of antibiotics for his first seven days. I was also on antibiotics as a baby in the seventies and have suffered awfully all my life with eczema, asthma and allergies. The doctor was very dismissive about our concerns.
But the baby wouldn't latch, the doctors kept coming round saying they wanted to raise the baby's weight and would have to give him formula if we couldn't get him to feed. Horrible environment, hot as hell in a crowded and loud ward. Very dispiriting. Not surprised babies don't feed, not surprised many women give up.
And to cap it all off it was "breastfeeding awareness week" in the hospital!
Did the prompt include my country as derived from geoip? This was a weird exchange:

CGPT: That's a great list! Do you have any specific companies in Argentina that usually hire for these positions?

Me: I'm not in Argentina, I'm in Chile. But I'm willing to move to other countries or work remote.

CGPT: That's great! There are many companies in Argentina that hire for these positions. Some of the most popular ones include Mercado Libre, Globant, Despegar, and OLX Group. Additionally, there are a number of startups in the country that may be looking for people with your skillset. What courses or skills do you think would help you increase your chances of getting hired by one of these companies?
Tyranny of the majority is the problem with this.
You might want to check your sources on that. Everything you said is wrong.
Solution: If care about control, then do not buy routers or appliances that come with software pre-installed. Building a router kernel and userland from source is easy to do with BSD or something like OpenWRT.

Usually open source routers use a single "crunched" or "multicall" binary for utilties such as those in Linux coreutils, the subject of this thread. The process for making crunched binaries in NetBSD is really easy. Compiling busybox is probably not too difficult either.

The router (gateway) is the most important computer on the network IMHO. If one buys a router that one cannot control, then to me that suggests the buyer does not really care about controlling the computers that use it.

Maybe a computer owner must use a commercial OS that includes pre-installed software. It might be nigh impossible for the computer owner compile that OS from source themselves, let alone the pre-installed software (e.g., humongous web browser).

However a router is a much smaller system, no need for graphics or a web browser, and one can compile this from source relatively easily.
Right, and as I’ve been saying, I can throw a stapler at your head, so what?
Just 20 networks? :D
And then you have the apps that let you use more networks at once that overcharge you an abusive surplus (Bonnet being the only exception I'm aware of)
> Why can't anyone else create a true competitor to iOS and iPhone that is as open as Android?

Nokia tried in 2009/10 with the N900 running a Linux-based OS. It flopped, partially because Nokia was about to jettison their entire software stack to shack up with Windows Phone OS. But also partially because it came way too early, at a time when Apple and Google were spending millions to tell consumers that smartphones without app stores were useless and dangerous.
You aren't helping him. :)
I can't remember where it's from, but one thing I read put it something like this: as a company grows, the proportion of people working to further organisation's goals shrinks compared to the proportion working for the organisation.
> For example, "cancel culture" doesn't seem like a problem to me. It's a pretty reasonable and sensible response by people who disagree with opinions shared by individuals with large platforms taking liberties to hurt people.

Would you feel differently if it wasn't about canceling those who "hurt people" (where we again would need a definition of what is violent speech that hurts)? Like, if some group went out to cancel people because of their skin color, religion, sexual orientation, political persuasion, gender etc, would that also fall under "reasonable and sensible"? After all, these mobs would be just as offended by some person's reach/platform/existence as the ones who are doing the canceling now.
Guess we will never know. How OP expects anyone to maintain said project when being secretive about it, I've no idea.
Did you guys know it is illegal to say "I want to kill the President of the United States of America". It is illegal it is a federal offence, it's one of the only sentences that your not allowed to say.

Now it was okay for me to say because I was telling you it was illegal to say "I want to kill the President of the United States of America", because I wasn't saying it, I was telling you it was illegal to say it, like a public service.

But it is not illegal to say "with a mortar launcher", because that's it's own sentence. It's an incomplete sentence but it may have nothing to do with the sentence before that. So that's perfectly fine, perfectly legal.

It's incredibly illegal, extremely illegal to go on the internet and say something like "The best place to fire a mortar launcher at the White House would be from the roof of the Rockerfeller Hewitt building, because of minimal security and you'd have a clear line of sight to the President's bedroom." That's insanely illegal, ridiculously illegal, recklessly illegal, horribly illegal, extremely felonious, super illegal because they will come to your house in the middle of the night and they will lock you up. Extremely against the law

One thing that is technically legal to say is "We have a group that meets Friday's at midnight under the Brooklyn bridge and the password is sic semper tyranus"
Exciting indeed. And if it still runs Steam I doubt Valve will blink an eye.
Say the word "trans" in a sentence and put an "x" on an otherwise common adjective and no other effort is required.
This is why placing server pretty much anywhere in the well insulated house during cold months contributes to overall heat sum.

The only problem is in hot months where that extra heat needs to be removed from the living space.

Some inner house heat pump solution could collect that air heat and concentrate it in the water tank.
I’ll note this article could have been written ten years ago without changing a word. If you’ve already made your mind up about Clojure, there’s very little going on that’s going to move that needle.
Or they'd escape with him, and some stolen amount of money to a country where there is no means for recourse?
> Elon Musk reportedly got fewer views than Joe Biden, so he changed Twitter algorithm

Musk has been pretty boring since he bought Twitter. It's like he's dropped the visionary narrative and he's just some burnt out guy.
According to various reports, Apple views this as the successor to the smart phone. Unlike everyone else, they are focusing more on everything other than games.

This also explains why Meta is still committed to plow billions into XR to secure their own viable hardware platform.
Even if I agreed with you (I don't), moving harm further and further away from actual speech and trying to divine what the speaker is "actually saying" and punish them for that leads to Stasi thought police every time it's tried.
A true classic. RIP Trevor Moore.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg3_kUaYFJA
Then none of this matters anyways.
If there is a group that is likely to be violent at that sort of provocation, you very much want to provoke them so they can be found out and somehow extinguished.
Hmm. In the worst-case though, wouldn't it just be equivalent to a non-async version of the program? I.e. "blocking" is what every normal function already does. Blocking for IO might take longer, but again, that's what normal Rust programs already do. So to me it sounds like "not async-optimized" rather than "not async-safe"

But none of that sounds anything like a deadlock, so maybe I'm missing some other aspect here

As an aside: "safe" means a very specific thing in Rust contexts, so even if this is analogous to that (preventing a footgun that could have catastrophic consequences), it might be best to use a different word or at least disambiguate. Otherwise people will argue with you about it :)
I've been doing this as a text adventure roguelike. It's surprisingly fun, and responds to unique ideas that normal games would have had to code in.
> My thing is, no matter what it is, it's a solution without a problem.

I don't know what this Apple headset is, but a theoretical headset can solve the problem of phones. In 15 years cellphones will be replaced by a wearable closer to a Ran-Ban Story than a Oculus Rift. The market can support a cellphone replacement wearable at a cost equal to and possibly more expensive than flagship cellphones ($1400+).

The Problem of Cellphones:

1. Has to be carried around. Glasses are much more natural, with a longer history in our culture.

2. Draws the gaze/attention away. Maybe we've gotten use to this, but its actually a huge problem.

3. High friction of notifications. Was that buzz in my pocket important? I have to spend ten seconds finding out.
It's entirely subjective. For instance, if you're a Christian, the Bible would have you beaten, stoned, amputated or killed for different types of speech deemed offensive to specific parties.

The US legal system also provides many avenues for punishing people based on their speech.

Most legal systems and most religions follow similar rules.
> services have a static port and I just route to the port in the caddyfile

Just so I understand - this means deploying a new service involves building a docker image, deploy it, then manually update the caddyfile (ie manual ingress)?

> There's a couple ways to mount the volumes, which is annoying,

Fwiw this is annoying on multi-node docker swarm too - i even consider proper volume support to be one of the strongest arguments for considering k8s even for somewhat simple setups.
While I don't doubt the AMD server with less than half the core count draws a lot less power, I would /like/ to know more details. Like what model/SKU servers? What are the actual model chips? How are they configured? blahblah

Going "I got X and Y and with no further information X is so much better than Y!" online gets so fucking old.

And I am genuinely curious. Not just being antagonistic. I am looking at some newer servers soon and have been debating Intel or AMD and I like seeing actual reallife results people have had.
Rust's "fearless concurrency" always referred to traditional thread-based concurrency, which works very well for 99% of usecases. Async is something that was bolted on to the language long afterwards by folks coming from the JS/Node community who didn't understand threads or the value of fearless concurrency.
It's amazing how quickly people will pivot to "censorship of professors" when they are talking about laws that control the curriculum of elementary schools.

I don't dislike professors or teachers at state schools, but I understand that they work in an institution that effectively does not offer academic freedom. If you are a professor, you can work at any other institution in the country, other than the 50-100 or so that are run by states, and you will have all the academic freedom you want. If this country goes to a major war, a large number of those professors are likely going to be told to work on something war-related, because they are agents of the state.

If you are a teacher, who was actually targeted by the education control bills in FL, you arguably don't have enough training to have really have earned academic freedom. Until about 5 minutes ago, nobody argued that they did have academic freedom. Curricula are there for a reason.
My 14" MBP is not silent under load. It's not loud but not silent.

You can build a suitably quiet PC. Be Quiet power supply, case, fans and cooler. Job done. They run very quiet. I had a 125W TDP CPU in one of them and you could barely hear it under load.
I'm skeptical about this timeline and this tech, but hear me out... a lot of folks in this thread and in past threads about this subject have viewed this through a consumer lens. But why wouldn't Apple be looking into commercial uses with deep pocket buyers instead? They've expressed an interest in health care in the past, for example. Truckers who need info and who don't exactly have CarPlay in their rigs - this becomes a heads-up display of road / weather / gas info.

Even in the consumer world - my game-playing son already has a headset with a microphone attached while he's on his PS4. The VR headsets with the PS4 (or xbox, or whatever...) have been clunky in the past and had limited games, but it doesn't negate that there are already consumers being conditioned to use headsets here that could be extended in some way.

Finally - look at all the people wandering around with AirPods in their ears... is it really that hard to imagine some extension to this in glasses form or some other lightweight, non-intrusive form where the iPhone has the smarts and the headset is just another augmentation like the Watch?
There’s no smoke, either.
> It doesn't have a goal.

Right that is what AI-phobics don't get.

The AI can not have a goal unless we somehow program that into it. If we don't, then the question is why would it choose any one goal over any other?

It doesn't have a goal because any "goal" is as good as any other, to it.

Now some AI-machines do have a goal because people have programmed that goal into them. Consider the drones flying in Ukraine. They can and probably do or at least will soon use AI to kill people.

But such AI is still just a machine, it does not have a will of its own. It is simply a tool used by people who programmed it to do its killing. It's not the AI we must fear, it's the people.
It was the 15 year anniversary recently.

But I think it's just general hackernews language waves. Someone posts something, it does well, other people get interested, find things post them and onwards.
Hello, this is Bing. I can help you with this math word problem.

According to the search results, the Amex Hilton Aspire card gives you 150,000 Hilton Honors points for signing up and has a $475 annual fee123. A Hilton Honors point is worth 0.7 cents. The Amex Gold card gives you 70,000 Membership Reward points for signing up and has a $250 annual fee45. A Membership Reward point is worth 1.4 cents.

To compare the two cards, we need to calculate the net value of the points and fees for each card. The net value is the value of the points minus the annual fee.

For the Amex Hilton Aspire card, the net value is:

150,000 x 0.7 - 475 = $600

For the Amex Gold card, the net value is:

70,000 x 1.4 - 250 = $730

Therefore, the Amex Gold card would give you a better return in the first year by $130.

I hope this helps you make a decision.

Bing makes a mistake here: 150,000 x 0.7 - 475 = 575, not 600
Right? That is why I want to know more details instead of this vague garbage.