skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The idea is simple: Give GPT3 a list of items and ask it to return a list of categories those items belong to.

60 seconds to sort 400 tabs is a hell of a price to pay. It needs to be worth it. Do you really need semantic search? Do you really need semantic search that queries a huge proprietary model?

(A really cool feature that Chrome doesn't have would be the ability to search the content of the webpage as well.)

What about something simpler, both architecturally and computationally. Start with something boring, like BM25. In my experience it works surprisingly well. If that's not good enough, then running a free model from Huggingface would be the next best option.

The benefit of this approach is that you can do it in the browser, in real-time (or at least locally with a downloaded model). Even 400 tabs will be a piece of cake. Plus you won't need to proxy precious API calls to a service which may become unavailable or very expensive with no warning.
Unreal Engine Integrations Now Available in Visual Studio 2022
Great, FYI and to my surprise (although not unusual for Apple to not follow web standards) Safari on MacOS also does not load Stackblitz.
The lunch cafeteria at the Museum of the American Indian in DC is fabulous sort of in this way.
I literally had no idea this was even planned. What a wonderful surprise this morning!
> the dinosaurs were around for longer than humans, but why didn’t they develop enough intelligence and capability to do what we did?

How can you be sure they didn’t?
Digital nomads dont pay income tax?
Well. It sounds like the museum was not financially self-sustaining (which is fine) and the founder did not leave a well endowed foundation to maintain it.

That combination is deadly.
I would agree in general, but the comment I was replying to is criticizing the following documentation as arrogant:

"If you aren’t willing to read the source of the function to learn what it does, we don’t want you anywhere near it."

And I believe that might be reasonable for a complex function that cannot be exhaustively documented in any form shorter than the source code.
Well given sheer number of new css/js frameworks/libraries that are produced every week, name collisions seem like an inevitability. After all, there are only 10,830,144,982,920 strings available in

[a-z0-9]{1,8}(\.js|\.css)?

It's basically IPv4 without ICANN.
Hi Everyone, I create a new version of CloudSticker. Hope you like it

CloudSticker - the all-in-one platform for organizing your creative and professional life. Perfect for creatives, professionals, and anyone seeking organization.

CloudSticker makes it easy to store, manage, and categorize all your important notes, ideas, deadlines, appointments and more in one place. Accessible anytime, anywhere via cloud-based storage.

Try CloudSticker for free today and experience the power of being organized and creative at your fingertips!

Here is 10 Promo Code For CloudSticker Plus

RLLLTMHYP74F
YAF6WLWET9AA
9EAE76JF94A4
EW4WF7RFMTYH
LRXEKHLR3Y7T
YY39L4R4R3LY
KL3R3TLTY6J3
EPL4XFNNRW4W
WM7R4FAN7PEY
JXALXFYYMP66
> They can't offer new perspectives

i think this remains to be seen.

At least, if you asked chatGPT for recipes, they can produce recipes that aren't pre-existing. So for at least some small domain, it can offer new perspective. Whether those recipes tastes good is a different story...
> If you are not willing to read the source code, but instead always blindly rely on documentation to be correct, then in my book that's just lazyness.

Hmm, I agree somewhat with both your comment and the one you're responding to. However, the claim that you should read the source of the libraries/frameworks you're using to me is interesting - because to me it seems sane, however not always entirely viable.

For example, who would be more successful:

A) A Java developer who reads the Spring source code and dives into that verbose Eldritch codebase with years upon years of fixes, design patterns and abstractions, all to learn how the dependency injection works better, probably spending days to weeks in the process?

B) Or perhaps someone who looks up the annotations or configuration they need, or maybe other code snippets on StackOverflow or the docs, or a similar site and solves their problem so they can move on to the next tasks, while being none the wiser otherwise?

Sometimes the answer will be A (deep knowledge can be useful), sometimes it will be B (we all have limited time and energy), however it feels to me that with sufficiently complex codebases one might just get more and more confused as well, as opposed to gaining any sort of a clarity or understanding, when the framework/library actually abstracts away really complex things.

Just using Java as the example here, as it's one of the more enterprisey languages and Spring as an arguably brownfield maintenance mode framework that's huge, given its long history.
Europe data salary benchmark 2023
The guidelines say:

> Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.

"Massive" is an assessment inserted by the submitter. I agree with the assessment, but I'd rather see that in a comment than the title. Alternatively, use the word "massive" in the title of a blog post, and submit that.
Vendor has a hammer to sell, and so finds nails.

This has already been evaluated and re-evaluated over the past 10+ years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SocketCAN

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FlexRay

Infotainment is more likely to go with less fault-tolerant, cheaper-to-implement standards, but you can bet critical systems will never.
So much this. I using Preact and still have to manually fish out files from build folders in Git repos just to have a usable library to import directly, because somehow “npm install” became the status quo.
'It was asked without the care one would normally use' yes I agree, equally my comment was made without the care one would normally use.

I absolutely think we a are controlled by the environment around us, and we're only properly starting to understand and measure this recently.
<text-input :status="store.error" id="text" label="" placeholder="What needs to be done?" v-model="store.newTodo" v-on:keyup.enter.stop="store.addTodo()">

v-on:keyup.enter.stop incantation followed by some string referring to code? Thanks but I will stick to my "complex" typed React
They don't. It's you who gives it meaning. Also, it's trained on trillions (gazillions?) of man-hours of data, so even if it's an antiquated "algorithm" it manages to be authentic. Also, no one factors in the small adjustments (and likely deliberate prompt / text insertions) that the parent company would undertake to make the ""AI"" seem more real. It's 50% tech, 50% marketing.
I don't think there is such a big discrepancy between apple and non apple users.
Does Jody Allen secretly hate Paul? Given the literal billions they have, it seems pretty spiteful how the LCM and Cinerama were treated.

I visited the LCM in 2016 as part of a computer arch course, it was really quite special to see working systems from the over 50 years ago and get to use them.
Unlikely. Clerical work mostly requires to handle messy input data from humans. It is hard to automate this. Jobs that are easy to automate often already have been automated with non-AI processes.
It only sorts on the title as far as I can tell.
> Your question assumes something that is unlikely to be true (increased rates of homosexuality and transgenderism),

Why would this be unlikely? I'm struggling to think of a cause that would result in both a constant rate of these things AND a rate of several percent (de novo mutations aren't anywhere near common enough to get you constant rate given that gay uncles arent going to be doing 2x as much parenting as fathers and theres only like 40 mutations per generation).

There's also the evidence of people answering "yes" more to "Are you a man attracted to men? Have you had sex with men?" type questions. Yes, there are other explanations like people being more comfortable answering yes, but it's still evidence.
Try to tie a tie or drink from a Starbucks cup with those tiny Trex arms. Ok, maybe they used straws…
> Of course, errors are rare, and races involving errors are exceedingly rare, so even to reproduce such a condition in a test wasn't a trivial task.

Are you assuming he did this maliciously? He very well may have, but why isn't this just a bug, that any one of us might write? You seem to feel like you understand the field a lot, and perhaps you do - in that case, perhaps, he didn't?

Maybe he did "suck"! But I honestly can't tell from the information you've given me. It sounds like both you and him would not easily write a test to catch the error.
I guess we might as well stop teaching math too, because everyone has calculators?
There are so many more convenient alternatives to the traditional massive tower for consumer PCs today, yet they are all severely limited by the same
issue: modern GPU form factors. I really wish the GPU makers would get a clue and come up with a more flexible standard. I suspect just making the heat sinks modular/swappable would mostly solve the problem.
> I don't think I would have looked closely if the word massive wasn't there

This is exactly why editorialising is bad. I don't want people to start inserting superlatives into their submissions to get more attention.
In most countries, I believe they should, but if they're being paid from another country, it may be relatively easy to get away with not paying income taxes -- since the country of residence would have no record of the income in the first place.
I have consistently been helped by ChatGPT every time Google has failed me. As a search engine it's really good. Only failing is re new data
Some do, many don't. Many don't even bother getting an appropriate work visa, at their latest port of call, there's no way they are going to be paying local taxes on that work.
> ... we're the only ones that fully work with plain JS

Vue (v2, don't know about v3) can also work without a build script, either with a render function, or a "template" (an string that mixes HTML with expressions).
It looks great. However browsing this forum reminds my of the biggest innovation since these days. The reddit/HN like front page going across multiple subjects, ranked not by reply date, but by popularity. Combined with a nested comment system, ranked by popularity.
For 99% of topics this is the most efficient way to browse and discover. Hence i feel that, besides nostalgia and very small communities (where you "know" people), this old forum style will never return to its former glory.
> WH Admins have no influence over economic data collection by the federal government

Less than you seem to think. The Fed, SSA, SBA, FDIC and CFPB are independent agencies. Many data are provided by private sources, e.g. ADP. And the statistical agencies, while legally dependent, are fiercely independent and competitive (i.e. when one starts being co-opted, the others publicly disagree).

Moreover, there are hundreds of billions of private dollars which take these data seriously. Is every one of them is in on the conspiracy or duped?
And again, it's all subjective. I suspect most people in the "real world" (whatever that means) do not actually find it fun, hence the vast majority of professional writing in other industries not having any emojis.

Lack of emojis doesn't mean PR driven corporate speak either, and in fact both are on same level of equivocal communication.
I was fortunate enough to go in 2019, pre-covid, while I had a day off in Seattle. It was a great museum, and I’m disappointed that I won’t be able to go back.

I tweeted a bunch of photos: https://twitter.com/ethomson/status/1109880552360951810
One pattern I noticed in the workplace: People are mocking things like LISP, Haskell, or Erlang, but get a hard-on when their bread language (e.g. Python) introduces new syntax for, say, pattern matching (rather a pattern-aware switch/case, because it isn't an expression).
Having worked at a 'unicorn' that grew from 200 employees to 1200 in a year: Yes.
True, but not if we adjusted for inflation* - in that case it would be https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13718810, which got almost as many upvotes 6 years earlier.

But sorry!

* That would be a fun project and would make /best and /bestcomments look very different (those are bad names but I guess we're stuck with them).
I disagree, but I think this comes down to the wording and tone.

The following would be perfectly justifiable and I'd agree with it wholeheartedly:

"This code is incredibly complicated and we don't have the resources to document it properly. So please DO NOT GO ANYWHERE NEAR THIS CODE unless you've spent weeks/months studying it in depth. And even then, think twice!"

One is a friendly "here there be dragons" style warning that explains some things (such as why it's not documented). The other is a passive-aggressive accusation followed by an "I know better than you, kiddo" style enforcement, which exudes arrogant presumption.
The EU has been pushing countries to end their golden visa programs for years, because they're widely abused by money launderers and people avoiding sanctions.

It's too bad, because I'd love to retire to a sunny country in the Mediterranean, but by the time I retire I suspect golden visa programs will have gone, and there aren't really a lot of options for visas in retirement.
Depending on their country of origin. Most western countries have rules that make income originating in other countries taxable in their home country (and then often have bilateral treaties that avoid income being taxed twice).

Quite a few digital nomads are tax frauds, though.
AIs are humans. We have extracted human essence from the data and put it in a box.
I must be some kind of medieval purist because today in the middle of 2023 I still play the original rogue, in its 3.6.3 and 5.4 versions, and I can barely tolerate some of the changes. That's what I don't like about Hack and its "new" incarnation, Nethack. Changes were introduced that change the original spirit. I also played Moria and Adom for years with mixed results. I was never able to play Nethack. I'm going to try, maybe this time I will succeed.
Productivity at this scale is literally just GDP / manhours worked.

So it's more likely that unemployment from lockdowns -> cheap labour -> no incentive to automate or efficient use of manpower.

That said, the US economy has been in a much stronger position than Europe so it seems there was the opposite of unemployment there.

But I find it hard to believe that some companies pushing a return to the office would be reflected in the national figures at this scale.
The newer (or perhaps still the same!) version of this is to add `babel-standalone` to the page [0] and put the `type="text/babel"` attribute on any `<script>` tags where you want to use JSX.

[0] https://reactjs.org/docs/add-react-to-a-website.html#quickly...
It wasn't and I'm not a guy.
Technically, he is already studying to be a drug dealer.
ChatGPT, please write a bland uninformed critique of LLMs as a boomer overinvested in education saying there is no way a chatbot can write something as complex as a college essay
How would evolution do that?
You're dodging.

The discussion and your point was about presumption of lawfulness and I made an analogy about presumption of safety.
I'm amazed at your pricing but it looks from your community forum activity that you have a market. Well done in an era where everyone expects stuff for free.
That's funny.
So being intelligent is executing algorithms deterministically and being a machine is making mistakes and being non deterministic?

How the tables have turned
That's just not the kind of goal natural selection is capable of optimising towards. Natural selection instils the execution of adaptations which on average have historically demonstrated increased reproduction rates. It does nothing else. (Humans, of course, have other goals orthogonal to those of natural selection, and are capable of optimising in favour of them, but natural selection is a blind idiot god that wants precisely one thing and will always aim dumbly at it to the exclusion of all else. We're fortunate that it is so dumb and slow, because it leaves us with plenty of room to do our own optimisation with our brains.)

Can you name any other time natural selection has optimised for the pleasure of a mammal at the explicit expense of reproduction?
If it's stupid but it works, it isn't stupid.
This is a pretty mean-spirited comment, I don't even know where to start. Homeless people are just people like you and me. If you'd been born in their shoes, with their inherited genetic make-up, raised by their parents, surrounded by their friends, living their life experiences etc you'd very possibly be homeless too and 'spewing bullshit' as you put it
I feel like you need to express your point better!
Usually, no, not on foreign income (with the exception that now retirees pay 10% on their pension, but it used to be 0). And even on domestic income from work, they pay only a flat tax of 20%. The income tax is normally 50.5% on income over 80k and 53% over 250k.
It's a little bit more like saying an F1 car is fundamentally the same as a Model T.

Spellcheck was one of the first language models (albeit miniscule) in widespread use. You can draw a direct line from bloom filters for spellcheck in resource constrained environments to predictive text and thence on to LLMs.
I've been mocked for decades for supporting this theory. Just like my opinions on AI. Quietly waiting for you guys to level up.
Most probably such ideas were propagated in oral traditions and embedded in religious thinking ever since homo sapiens got their brain activated. Removing anthropocentric exceptionalism has been a major driver of what we (now) call scientific thought but it is really just a "state of mind" that precedes more sophisticated, culture contingent, frameworks.

Ofcourse there is a major difference between betting that "X is not different that all the Y's" and actually proving it :-), which is what makes this field of inquiry so fascinating.
That’s why I set up a subdomain for all sorts of ramblings that are not even search engine indexable:

http://sentience.lostbookofsales.com

My main website hasn’t seen any activity lately because of what you mention, and laziness…
Long-term governance is hard.

I have been thinking recently, how could you design governance for a high-end nursing home so that the facility perpetually serve the rotation and interests of its residents. Without governance, such a facility would quickly trend towards entropy. The first step of entropy is pillage by the executive.

When I look around, adversarial systems (courts, parliaments) seem to be a device for building bedrock for better civilisation. I don’t think charity is, due to the governance obstacles.
> ChatGPT is, in fact, incapable of knowing anything at all.

this is foundamentally wrong. I've been instructing chat gpt about wargame rules, and it's understanding those rules well enough to run rounds of combat. that is far beyond what this article pretends chatgpt to be (a massive pretrained markov chain) as all that learning is happening after training

heck, you can make chatgpt pretend to be something that isn't, exhibiting creativity that is well beyond previous llm.

> All it knows, all it knows are the statistical relationships of how words appear together

again, you can ask nonsense, and it will not spew nonsense back. it has a cursory understanding of what nonsense is, and will not fall for easy traps (i.e. what year apollo 7 landed on the moon) that would trick straighforward probabilistic models

all in all, this article toned down my respect for the blog down two pegs, if he's so wrong about this topic, how much was he wrong on other topics where I had no understanding and took his word for good?
There is no solution for the problem you are trying to solve.

The issue is structural and is consistent with any other one to many structured communications system.

All implementations that have this structural deficit will get bad actors creating multiple accounts to amplify and de-amplify narratives and sow disinformation or irregular warfare activities/narratives/active measures.

Reddit's subreddits that offer technical support and other similar help from volunteers are a perfect case study of how volunteerism fails. Primarily because bots seek to constantly discredit, dispute, and target those that provide value (as a resource drain).

In the past you could ask questions in places like /r/linuxquestions and get a decent answer, in recent years most of the experts have left because 70% or more of the responses aside from the occasional person asking the question were from third-parties who sought to muddy the water, discredit and dispute what was being provided, the value of which was often based on professionally tested methodology from the trenches.

Volunteer psychology says you stop doing it when it starts costing you. This is relevant on all current platforms.
I remember when Google did this for Maps. What a glorious day that was in the OpenStreetMap community. Big increase in "how do I host a tile server / geocoder" questions coming in.

Where would Bing API users move to, I wonder. How does it compare to Google pricing? Or ahrefs and petal, which are hitting my websites day and night? (Edit: tail -f access.log right now shows that ahrefs and petal are indeed going at it, no idea what products they offer though.) Yandex recently also upped its crawling game, has me wondering if they are making a copy of the web a la Internet Archive in case of more international, eh, operations.
The golden visa isn't causing the housing shortage because it's a very small program.

I couldn't find a primary source but all sources say the same as this one: https://www.imidaily.com/datacenter/portugal-data/

The program lets in on the order of a few thousand people per year.

Other visa programs there vastly outstrip this is number.

The golden visa is just a great marketing term for political ire. It implies wealthy privilege so it's easily targeted.

Of course, the reality of things is that Portugal has recently rightly earned a reputation for being a great place to live and people (not many of them super rich) decided to live there. Housing is being built to compensate.

The airbnb thing is more interesting and nuanced but harder to get a handle on. It might be that airbnb is causing some unhealthy things in the real estate market.
> evade all taxes due to crypto exemption

Wat.