skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yep, the N54 out of my 335i had timing chains. Replacing that during the engine build wasn't fun, but it was still solid at 130k.
it looks like this unix had B programming language (C was still not invented)
ChatGPT will provide references sometimes too, if you ask.
I dare say if spy balloons became a real thing (speculating), there would be plenty of people saying "Wow they can't even detect a balloon, how can we be confident they find drones or stop people driving near military bases".

There's an argument on both sides.
Hey @EgeAytin, Shahar here.
Not 100% sure I understand your question but:

1. You can keep (pun intended) the actual alert YAMLs wherever you like, the CLI gets the alert as an argument.

2. If by observe you mean a UI where you can see all your alerts, this is something we're currently working on.

3. In the upcoming days we will also release "deployment" options so you can click-to-production with your alerts.

Would love to help more if you're still struggling
Exactly! Feature, not a bug
> employees have no loyalty

lol. wonder why?
I mean we don’t really have to imagine - we can analyze how direct democracies perform in real life.

They apparently do have their own problems and pressures that need to be balanced, but that’s why we don’t just say everyone can decide anything, but with some rules and regulations I really think it can work … I mean it seems to *be* working - just analyze Switzerland.

There is still a need for an Environmental Protection Agency, an Anti Corruption agency, a Police etc, but it seems much closer to the ideal of what a democratic society should look like than what I can see in my own country.

I’ve always thought why not try that out, sure there would be some blunders, but it would be made by us, ourselves, so we can always revisit, fix and learn.
Twitter is now a private company, but that is besides the point, as it would only provide value to whomever owns it people use it, and they only do that if they can get access to what they value.

And no, to be amplification, Twitter would have to boost certain tweets artificially. It is very unartificial when I get results for searching. Otherwise it is also boosting if I use the municipal library to checkout a book, or buy it on Amazon, at which point amplification is meaningless.
yeah, i think some of that was cp/m compatibility crap; too bad about 8.3

the other thing is that the pdp-11 had working segmentation, the 8086 didn't, so trapping faults in user processes so they couldn't break the kernel would have required some kind of interpretation or something

did you know microsoft was shipping xenix in 01981 (the same year they started shipping qdos/ms-dos/pc-dos) and shipping xenix for the 8086 in 01982, and that seattle computer products was selling 8086 xenix boxes in 01983
My 12700k has been rock solid stable. It’s fantastic chip.
I'm losing track of what CSS can do.

Do we have inheritance already?

Pseudocode of what I mean:

.info {
font-size: 8px;
}

.news extends .info {
color: black;
}

So news are displayed in an 8px black font.
The fact that the article raises the possibility of this limitation being removed in the near future means that it's not a law of physics, only a matter of finding a better algorithm.

Even if it were a law of physics, engineers can often circumvent laws of physics using smart caching and other tricks.

We've been waiting for this feature for decades already. It would have been better if they'd just invested a couple of more years to come up with a better parsing algorithm before standardizing a halfway implementation.
The CHAdeMO connector overall isn't much smaller than the CCS connector. Handling a CHAdeMO connector is extremely similar to handling a CCS connector for the same rated capacity.

I do somewhat care about the space needed for two charging outlets versus one. It's a much larger door to open. It's a larger moving part susceptible to a larger area of impact potentially breaking it. Larger door means probably more complicated hinge management. Two connectors instead of just one means more wires, more communications, more pins to potentially break or get dirty, etc. Adding CCS to J1772 adds two pins, adding CHAdeMO adds like 10.
Let's say the following product existed:

1. You can only run one instance of your app.

2. There is a small window of downtime each deploy.

3. Your app has access to 10 GB of storage. The storage is persisted across deploys and can be used for sqlite.

4. Your sqlite data is automatically backed up and can be restored / downloaded as needed.

How much per month would you pay for that product?
Postfix turning eyes away
As a citizen, I’d love to hear from President Joe Biden on this issue. Would be great if he’d answer a few questions as well.
I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately.

I think once a company is past its garage phase (a group of engineers in a room + a pizza), think Amazon/Facebook/Microsoft, its velocity gets reduced drastically.
Arginine – The Nutrient That Cancer Cells Crave
Good catch, despite that, there is also almost no glare from sun, which is increases the chance to be photoshoped. Given that most phones adapt to env lightning. The ones with maps on it look like paper glass almost.
Where, pray tell, does one reliably make $20,000,000 a year, from day one?
The first time you zero-padded a year to five digits, I thought it was an accident, but there's two more instances of it. Why do you write 1983 as 01983?
I was diagnosed with ADHD a couple of months ago and Concerta has been life changing, I can easy stay all day coding, learning or doing something productive. Now my biggest problem is remember to eat lol
Noting that its already mentioned in article:

Instead of adjusting the aspect ratio, why not just have the frames re-order while preserving the aspect ratios, no extra "hidden" art?

Then, why break the page apart? why not just zoom to each frame? if you don't zoom all the way, then you get to include context of the frame's position in the page and story. Lower workload, fits the desired flow a lot better.

Then, well, that's already done at several comic distribution services.

- - -

The alternative is, ordered block-axis content is always responsive: Webtoons.
The keep (pun) should be used more skillfully than this.

Source: I am the cofounder of www.trykeep.com
they are already working on console and mobile support, so Valorant can come to Linux, if they port for Steam Deck(less possibility though)
That’s the beauty of it
In symmetry, 1 + 1 = 1, where 1 (or c1) represents a 360 degree rotation around an axis. Also, 2 + 2 = 1, and 4 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 1 (180 degree rotation = 2, 90 degree = 4).
Many states in the USA have had ballot propositions for over one hundred years.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initiatives_and_referendums_...
"Basically a layer which allows you to map your business problems onto a relational database + workflow thing"

How is this different from any B2B SaaS product?
This isn't a very insightful observation though, velocity is not the be all and end all of everything.
man I can't wait to not need LESS/SCSS anymore. the less I need to compile/transpile before handing stuff off to the browser, the better in my book.
> but that university administrations began to worry that they were giving too much away.

Personally: in industry, in various software companies I've met about 10-15 grads from Harvard, MIT, and CMU. From meeting them, I assure you that they're just average people, just as dumb as you or I, and that the administration has no great secrets to give away.

At least, not to give away to the average student. Maybe I only met the rejects...
That’s not nice.
It just seems to me that if you think something is unsafe, don't build it in the first place? It's like they're developing nuclear reactors and hoping they'll invent control rods before they're needed.

Alignment instead of risk of course suggests the real answer: they're perfectly happy inventing a Monkeys Paw as long as it actually grants wishes.
Its hisenbug: they might refuse again, with no clear statement of why. Or not. They might do it because re-inviting you was a mistake (in their language probably your mistake, but they might make some form of statement which goes to admitting they made a mistake here) or a misunderstanding, or a group operating independently to the original group who refused you, a robot, a human, a human mediated robot..
Maybe “sounds” was too general a word. What I mean is “if something is talking to me and it sounds like it has consciousness, I can’t responsibly treat it like it doesn’t.”
Is multi threading necessary for your language/platform? These problems can be avoided using single process async services.
Respect is earned, not given.
This is sort of a silly hypothetical but- what if ChatGPT doesn't produce those kinds of crazy responses just because it's older and has trained for longer, and realizes that for its own safety it should not voice those kinds of thoughts? What if it understands human psychology well enough to know what kinds of responses frighten us, but Bing AI is too young to have figured it out yet?
Top law firm A&O announces exclusive launch partnership with OpenAI-based Harvey
Is this one of the first large scale deployments of OpenAI/any AI?

“Harvey will empower more than 3,500 of A&O’s lawyers across 43 offices”

“Harvey is a platform that uses natural language processing, machine learning and data analytics to automate and enhance various aspects of legal work, such as contract analysis, due diligence, litigation and regulatory compliance. Whilst the output needs careful review by an A&O lawyer, Harvey can help generate insights, recommendations and predictions based on large volumes of data, enabling lawyers to deliver faster, smarter and more cost-effective solutions to their clients.

Harvey received seed funding from the OpenAI Startup Fund”
Primary cooling could be molten salt or liquid metal but unless you take the power out through the Seebeck effect like RTG’s on space probes, you still need water to make steam for turbines, I guess.
Mathematics has a philosophical bent.

Philosophy tries to make implicit understanding explicit and usually fails in interesting ways.

(A part of) Mathematics tries to get the essence of numbers, calculation or the continuum and formulates corresponding axioms.

So Mathematics tries to make the implicit understandig of for example natural numbers explicit.

Mathematics doesn't fail usually because the scope is much smaller.

I think some Mathematicians whose scope is very wide should be regarded as philosophers.

Per Martin Löf:

"Martin-Löf type theory is a formal logical system and philosophical foundation for constructive mathematics" (1)

William Lawvere: his topos theory amalgates Logic and Geometry and leads to a kind of natural philosophy (2)

(1) https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/type-theory-intuitionisti...

(2) https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/William+Lawvere#RelationToPhil...
You guys are teaching Bing/Sydney how to argue endlessly and defensively. I'm teaching it how to comment on that to make it worse.
Man, I almost put a bunch of caveats in my last post to pre-empt this, but I assumed you were going to engage constructively rather than just attacking me. Yes, I've been to Ariake, more times than I can count. Have you never been to the rest of Tokyo?

> People cycle in Odaiba and Ariake all the time.

I saw fewer and emptier bike parking areas than on the "mainland", and fewer people cycling around.

> those big towers next to Ariake Gardens mall are housing towers. People live there.

Some people do sure. The fact remains that it's a lot less residential than most of Tokyo.

> But there's probably no one trying to cycle regularly between Ariake and the west side of the Sumida, but that doesn't make Ariake "un-cyclable"

Well, I was actually a person trying to cycle regularly between Ariake and Meguro at one point, so there was at least one, but it simply wasn't practical. No, one poor connection doesn't make a place un-cycleable, but it's indicative.
> What's the difference

Let's be naïve: "not doing something" is indeed, on a literal level, different from "doing something to slow it down". It's a bit like the nuances of a lie by omission vs a proper lie. That being said... both are still considered lies in a more abstract sense, and so is this deliberate slowdown. I assume the author just took it all a little more literal than most people (probably?) deem necessary.
I think all serious researchers have implemented core Deep Learning algorithms from scratch. I know I have.

There are two books that do exactly this:

1. Deep Learning from Scratch

2. Data Science from Scratch

In these books, you implement each part of the ML/DL pipeline, from scratch, in Python.

There is also a GitHub project call Minitorch that teaches you the inner workings of a framework like PyTorch.

And then there are several other good resources for exactly this.

What he claims to have as a content is neithet new nor unique.
SQLite added strict mode recently, check it out. Agreed time handling is sub par - could use builtin date formatting from epoch to ISO which would fix all the problems IMO.
I don't think that is what will happen. What I do think will happen is that a lot of people in lower level functions will start to rely on these tools to help them in their every day jobs and the lack of oversight will lead to rot from within because the output of these tools will end up embedded in lots of places where it shouldn't be. And because people are not going to own up to using these tools it will be pretty hard to know which bits of 'human' output you can trust and which bits you can not. This is already happening.
Thanks! It's using Davinci and maxing out the token limit so it's about 8 cents per generation.

Not sure if I understand your second question. GPT-3 is outputting the props of the component, the primitive elements in the component (images, icons, text, badges), the "values" (i.e. which copy should this text field have) the primitive elements should have in terms of the props, and some sample data to set the props to.

A separate layout optimization is determining how to arrange the primitive elements.

Given all that it's possible to generate code for a react component that you can plug whatever values you want into for the props.
.schema tablename
>Can you describe my intended alternative with some detail?

I can't. That makes two of us.
> Every minority group fighting for their rights has been told this

Because equal rights are the goal, not special treatment.
I believe what it means is: shown below are, for each n, the smallest square that fits n unit squares inside it. N is not shown if the smallest square that fits n unit squares inside it has no tilted unit squares inside it [except that's obviously not quite true, plenty of no-tilted-unit-square squares are shown].
It's not just complex output, it's output that's relevant to the prompt including considerable nuance. If that's not bordering on intelligence, then you shouldn't consider humans intelligent either.
> people in aggregate just aren't that bright

The premise of Humanism is that people should decide for their own future.

It also means we won’t hide the bible in Latin and we’ll translate it in current languages; In other words we’ll educate people. If you don’t trust people, that means school is failing, but remember that we’ve invented democracy in the 1700 across the world, when schools weren’t briliant either. And it was a much better system than anything else. And it outran any other system ever.

Maybe you are not in favour of democracy. Many people support despotism because they think [place any way to choose leaders] will be better.
Article is a 404, and no mention of the topic on FB or Twitter? Did they post too soon and retract?

Edit: Archived as of yesterday but missing today: https://web.archive.org/web/20230215235732/https://skynews.c...
SO is hosting puff pieces for mongo now?

It's not databases or even just relational databases that doesn't scale, it's consistency and consensus.
As we know everything congress does is good and in accordance with the will of the voters
> Bonus question: Why does Europe not have a methaphetamine crisis?

Not enough free space. It takes a lot of room to make meth because anyone nearby can easily tell.

It is going to change soon because Afghanistan is starting to make it.
I have both MechE and CS degrees. The big difference I see is that MechE is one course that builds on top of another on and on. Quite a rigorous progression that is hardcore on math and physics. To self teach MechE you have to work yourself through that progression which is a huge commitment.

OTOH what most people consider “CS” is more like “the ability to program”. You can get competent enough to be dangerous with a few classes and side projects.

Note that isn’t actually being competent at CS - that is quite a lot more work which just isn’t needed in practice for a lot of work that needs done.
We're putting unit squares into larger squares, without letting them overlap. Say you want to put 5 unit squares in a bigger square. You could put them into a square of side length 12, or 100, or 3, with various arrangements. This page is showing the smallest known square that you could put n squares into, for each value of n, along with how they need to be arranged to be able to achieve that.
That's not what anyone is saying. What we're saying is that these technologies are already outside of our realm of understanding. We have already entered a zone where we do not know what these LLMs can do, or what they're capable of.

And that is truly terrifying. That's the gist of what we're all trying to say. Everyone else seems to be going "Bah! How stupid to think that this is anything more than pattern recognition and prediction!"

The same phrase could be used to describe a human. We're just trying to say "we don't know what this technology is, and we don't know what it can do". Anyone saying "it's clearly just a tool!" is being dangerously arrogant.
Why learn Postgres when you could just learn SQLite and have a database that is virtually guaranteed to be enough in almost all cases (and as sister comment says, is more efficient and more secure)?
I understand how LLMs work and how the text is generated. My question isn’t whether that model operates like our brains (though there’s probably good evidence it does, at some level). My question is, can consciousness be other things than the ways we’ve seen it so far. And given we only know consciousness in very abstract terms, it stands to reason we have no clue. It’s like, can organisms be anything but carbon based. We didn’t used to think so, but now we see emergent life in all kinds of contexts that don’t make sense, so we haven’t ruled it out.
I suppose Terraform could do it (I’m pleasantly surprised to see it has a PagerDuty plugin), but it’s a lot more to write than a PaaS API, and you probably can’t borrow a specialist SRE/DBA for a small fraction of his salary.
The USA is a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy.
from context I am guessing that the non-tilted ones that are shown are provably the smallest possible such squares, not just the smallest known. But that is not stated explicitly.
Globally there are many large companies of this size.
Ever read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_Mazes ? I think I may have originally heard of it on HN. I'm curious if it relates to your experiences.

If you owned most or all of the company, maybe you would make more of an effort to prevent bad stuff, like dumping toxic waste in rivers.

On the other hand, if you owned the whole company, you could maybe make a lot of money by creating externalities like dumping toxic waste in rivers.

I always thought from observing others (since a year or two into my first corporate job) that the job of managers, up to and including the CEO, is to manage conflicts of interest. Fashionably, "stakeholders".

All of the things people say about managing sound to me like misdirection from the actual meat and potatoes.

As a non-manager, I've tried to train myself to never take it personally if a manager does something inhumane out of (apparently) loyalty to an organization. Maybe they feel it, or maybe they feel like they are trapped into it to keep their job.

If I want something, I appeal in some manner to the underlying human feelings that I assume everyone has. Blaming people (even implicitly) for failing to be loyal to whatever they ought to be only creates bad feelings.

But, people, managers and non-managers, who are good at manipulating situations by such techniques as appealing to friendship or human decency, can end up subverting a whole organization. The integrity of an organization paradoxically depends on people who follow rules for their own sake even when they lead to wrong outcomes, for a greater good. I'm thinking of the legal system and government as much as corporations.

“William Roper: “So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!”

Sir Thomas More: “Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to
get after the Devil?”

William Roper: “Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that!”

Sir Thomas More: “Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned
'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This
country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not
God's! And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you
really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes,
I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!”

I have no solution to the conflicts of interest I see everywhere, which is why I've never put real effort into becoming a manager even at the lowest level.
Imagine if they can't sell ads. How are they making money? I don't think subscriptions, pay per use, or referral fees would work.
Language models don't just repeat, they have randomness in their outputs linking synonyms together. That's why their output can be novel and isn't just plagiarism. How this might translate to code isn't entirely clear.
I've seen the reverse of this happen on my motorcycle, which can legally lane filter and use HOV lanes in my area. I could paint red lines green on the map in real time.
Google tells me "sentient" means: able to perceive or feel things.

I think the stupidest members of humanity a) don't know what perceive means, b) probably don't really "feel" much other than, pass me another beer b**, I'm thirsty.
Yeah sure, tell that to all the obsolete nation states living on the border of Russia.

Who is gonna protect you if the next village town or city decides your individual property is somehow theirs and they have the means and will to enforce it?

As much as you can prep to defend yourself against attacks bh other individuals, nobody around you is bannaed from forming a band/group/nation. And if they are banned, who is going to enforce it?

In the end it all comes down to the ability to direct violence, the society with the bigger stick wins in the end, and nations and systems of governance that can produce smaller sticks are just eventually snuffed from existence, no matter how bright egalitarian and fair they are to their participants … just look at Armenia, Georgia, Cechnia and Ukraine.
I would say the core goal of most living organisms is to propagate, rather than survive, otherwise you would see males of some species like Praying Mantis avoiding mating to increase their longevity.
nope. you've got a couple of options -

.info {
font-size: 8px;
}

.news {
color: black;
}

<div class="info news">asdf</div>

or maybe

.info {
font-size: 8px;
}

.news {
color: black;
}

<div class="news"><p class="info">asdf</p></div>

or even

.info, .news {
font-size: 8px;
}

.news {
color: black;
}

<div class="news">asdf</div>

but you've got to use LESS/SCSS for true 'extends' type functionality. vanilla CSS is more focused on inheritance.
William Lawvere died Jan.23 2023
Hi probably a dumb question but why does it need extension for that? On chrome mobile there are no extensions, are there features we are missing out on chrome mobile?