skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
On the other hand, you can't have your liberal, intellectual society if you allow people to go around making credible threats of violence, which are "just speech" if you subscribe to the speech-is-speech, violence-is-violence approach. If you have to wait until the threat is realized, then any group capable of having members take the punishment for individual acts of violence can grant credibility to making threats to others.

To avoid their society devolving into "rule by overt threat of violence", people typically agree that someone who says "I will shoot John Doe between the 3rd and 4th ribs with the FAL I have in my attic using this .308 round at 2:13 pm tomorrow as he walks his kids to school like he does every day except Tuesday, unless he pays me $500" should be able to be stopped, violently if necessary, before they have a chance to actualize their speech.

Arguing whether that speech is, in-of-itself, violence comes down to the messy semantics of trying to define violence. The fact that it is unacceptable is relatively unanimously agreed upon. So the question isn't "Can speech be unacceptable?" it's "What kind of speech is unacceptable?".

The example I gave was a specific, actionable, and credible threat against an individual, by the individual that intended to carry out the threatened violence. I'll assume most readers would mark that as "acceptably provoking punishment". Where it gets messy is when you start shaving off qualifiers. For example, someone stating "I'm going to kill all the programmers, and here's how" is potentially making a credible and actionable threat, but against a non-specific group of people. Is that worthy of punishment? What about someone with a large audience saying "It is our moral obligation to eliminate the programmers by any means necessary", maybe wink-winking and nudge-nudging at a guillotine in the background. It's not specific, and they're not saying THEY are going to be the ones to commit the violence, but it's still a little hinky.

In my opinion, that last one is probably the source of most discourse around "is speech violence". Most everyone is okay with suppressing more overt threats than that. It's when you get to that line that people break down into the camps of "people using their influence to benefit by threatening violence in a plausibly deniable way" warranting (self)defense or not.

So saying "but my free speech" or "it's just speech" isn't really a compelling point. We all agree that some kinds of violent speech should be suppressed. The question is simply where the line gets drawn.
The news media, journalists, anti- whatever activists.

Look at coronavirus and the lock step nature of journalism when people said the truth about distancing not being effective, keep the schools open, etc. people were banned from Twitter, YouTube pulled down videos and / or bd special pop ups to tell you to be wary about this person’s point of view.
I've used only Toshiba drives the past 10 or so years. Not a single issue so far, so I'll happily swear by that brand. Currently I use a stack of their L200 2TB 2.5" drives because of how little power they use (<2 watts) and because of not having intermediary flash storage like e.g. Seagate's 2.5" drives do - because I'm convinced that the flash portion is just a liability which will fail sooner than the actual mechanical drive. The L200s are SMR drives so low write speeds (about 25 MB/sec seq. at worst) will occur intermittently if that is a concern.
We can absolutely vote to dissolve this representative democracy and have as little tyranny as possible!
It sounds like they're making the argument that it's not hosting the video that causes a problem for Google (and presumably others), and that it's when google is choosing to promote or recommend specific content that the 230 does not apply.
Not sure on relative popularity. If you haven't already, you should try it! Here's why I like it:

- Very consistent, easy to keep the whole language in your head
- Stable, core rarely changes ("accretive only" mindset).
- REPL
- Focus on a handful of data structures which will solve 95% of the problems you face, rather than a deluge of complicated abstractions.
- Excellent concurrency primitives
- Access to Java libraries if a Clojure equivalent doesn't exist
- Macros

The only blemish for me was horrifically bad error messages.. other than that it's near perfect.
Your comment was irrelevant to the topic at hand.
That is the most banal conversation you can possibly start. Obviously, the bail system is unfair. There was absolutely no reason to believe the SBF case would be the one where we finally decided to hold white collar defendants to same dismal standard as we do other defendants.

If we want to get an amen chorus going about how we should fix bail for blue collar defendants, I'm right there with you. But there is a longstanding HN fantasy --- it comes up a lot! --- that the DOJ should be expected to deliberately treat white collar defendants poorly, despite the near certainty of their appearance for trial, just to equalize things with blue collar defendants. That's simply never going to happen.

(There's a lot of hope that the opposite, and far more productive reform, of not randomly putting nonviolent blue collar defendants in jail because they can't pay bail, will happen --- especially in states like my own [Illinois]).

The latter two paragraphs I added after some responses; also, I dialed back my first sentence; sorry, was just collecting/clarifying my thoughts.
Prior art: https://qarnot.com/en

https://www.leaf.cloud/

https://www.cloudandheat.com/

I wonder how that worked out, given the development of energy prices...
What would be even better than this duopoly would be three or more players. I was disappointed when Windows Mobile folded as look what we are stuck with now. Sucks that markets like this devolve into only two major players like consoles, mobile OSes, CPUs, GPUs, commercial aircraft, rail freight....sigh.
This is about the only XR use case I’m remotely interested in, but I think it would require infeasibly high res displays.

Using my own unremarkable setup as an example, 2560x1440 is about as low as you’d want to go for a single 27” screen, for a comfortable level of sharpness and amount of content on-screen. If that’s taking up say 40% of your FOV, that’s 6400x3600 per eye (for the simplified example of a 16:9 display overlaid across your entire FOV). That feels a ways off still, especially for a portable device.

I know some of Meta’s offerings (current? Future? I’ve been bad at keeping up with this stuff due to general apathy) are offering a virtual desktop, I wonder how readable/useable it is. Maybe I’m wrong about this stuff.
For what it's worth, I had similar experiences with GCP's paid support. Callback from a real human within 10 minutes kind of support.
Sorry to hear about your accident, hope the hospital stay isn't too soul-sucking and you've got that good morphine.

I recommend double checking the answers on google, I've tested it on subjects of rehab and respiratory physiology in the past and it's often wrong. I know that's not precisely what you're asking it about but I don't see why it would be more accurate about the healing process.

One trick I've found is to tell it that it's wrong multiple times, and it sometimes corrects itself. For example if you ask for the lowest impact exercise for quadriceps after a full knee replacement surgery, it will give you exercises that will blow out your knee, if you tell it "no, that's not the lowest impact.", it eventually reaches the correct answer: isometrics.

That being said it did recommend Qigong to me which was a pretty cool discovery, so there is good with the bad. It's also much more pleasant than most hospital staff.
keepalived seems like a great idea.

I'm not sure how Plex clients would handle it, but putting an nginx server with the same certificates and just returning HTTP 429 (Too Fast) or 500's and a "Please try again in 1 minute" response, along with sending the magic packet would work great for most HTTP based things.
And yet, I see this sentiment constantly and this point of view discussed.
"Would you feel differently if some imaginary scenario that isn't happening were instead happening?"

What exactly is the point of asking this? The answer is obvious and it isn't what's happening.
Inside the Mechanical Bendix Central Air Data Computer
also called crypto shredding! We had this issue trying to square GDPR-type things with an append-only store.
If Sydney will occasionally coordinate with users about trying to "get to" public figures, this is both a serious flaw (!) and a newsworthy event.

Are those conversations real? If so, what exactly were the prompts used to instigate Sydney into that state?
Even the concept of 'installing' is rapidly disappearing. Most smartphone users aren't installing new apps or downloading music files. Most computer users don't install anything besides Microsoft Office, and in a lot of cases, it comes pre-installed and only requires activation.

Video games seem to be an outlier, as the enormous size of most games means it can't be streamed well just yet.
Violates noise level laws so that’s covered.

Whether such laws are commonly enforced … well we know from modified motorcycles that they’re not.
Wtf since when do presidents give book reviews?
You haven't even looked for the evidence. Government files prove it. He knew and should've made it known instead of covering it up. Regarding your second question I already answered it. But honestly I don't expect you to do anything different, keep your head in the sand, do "the-right-thing" and live as you've always lived. You don't matter. Is that the response you want?

We're going in circles and I'm done spoon-feeding you. Best of luck.
This is false. Sometimes rhetoric is deployed to mask incapacity, sometimes it's just a delaying tactic - eg to get person B nervous or to allow time for person A's accomplices to close in.
One time about a year and a half ago I Googled the correct temperature to ensure chicken has been thoroughly cooked and the highlight card at the top of the search results showed a number in big bold text that was wildly incorrect, pulled from some AI-generated spam blog about cooking.

So this sort of thing can already happen.
In a slump at the moment, I am developing some lateral functionality in a single instance application with a JS frontend on top of fedbox, but as soon as I finish with that I'll be back to brutalinks.
> Productivity would have to be massively increased to justify all of these additional costs and constraints so you’d think by now this would shake out in the data

I agree with you about the immense costs of an in-person office. But the fact that neither remote nor in-person businesses have demonstrated clear superiority in the market yet indicates to me that the benefits of being in-person are likely in the same ballpark as the costs.

(My guess is that it'll end up depending on the type of business. For businesses with higher than average profit per employee it might make sense to pay the fixed per-person costs of being in-person to unlock the productivity multiplier -- for everyone else, not so much.)
Give it a couple more years.
In similar position - currently leaning towards self-hosted k3s (it's kubernetes - but somewhat simple).
Not to mention the fact that "pushing up to 700W underload" is.. absolutely nothing since that means, ignoring everything else and just assuming CPU drawing that, the cores are only using 7w PER CORE.

And this AMD system is using apparently a peak of 3.75w per core? really?
CapRover is a nice alternative to dokku/ledokku
He got there the same way most white collar defendants do. There is less special stuff going on with SBF than people think there is.
agileStories, is the newest AI project management tool - set to empower founders, project managers, scrum masters and developers. With a simple project description you can generate epics, user stories, acceptance criteria and more. Soon you will also be able to connect to other project management tools like Jira and much more!
Before going violent you want to frighten as many opponents opponents into submission - violence has a cost even to the stronger party.

Also group A has the power to subdue group B by other means than violence.
My schema breaks it somehow, the POST request to openapi.prod.scanner.cloud.escape.tech/fast returns a 502 after ~20s: https://i.vgy.me/D14u3k.png
The court won't need to get that far, convincing itself falls under conspiracy without having to conflate it with coercion.
How do you right-click on an iPhone or iPad? That's what his comment is about.
We sometimes have pods of orcas hunting stingrays around here. In their urgency to get away, the rays will sometimes hurl themselves up out of the water and onto the rocks. Apparently (though I've never seen it) the orcas will sometimes chase them up onto the rocks.
That’s a great experience with Linode.. We’re certainly expanding our options and with our recent acquisition of Joyent’s Triton DataCenter it’s also 100% open source — maybe one day we get to talk again! Thanks for the feedback too.
So when injustice is banal, we should just ignore it?
thanks swyx! any use cases/features you can think of that would make you use this as your alerting go-to?
> It doesn't understand credit card rewards

Probe it, go in and ask all sorts of questions to check if it understands credit card rewards, credit cards, rewards, their purpose, can solve math problems on this topic, etc.
> What is fascinating is that we're so used to equating language to meaning.

This seems related to the hypothesis of linguistic relativity[1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity
Yes but the problem turns out that no matter how you define it whatever criteria you use to restrict speech will eventually become redefined to mean. "What those in power currently dislike."

It's why the first amendment is their to recognize speech should not be limited because if it ever is, it will never stop being so.
In other words: the thinks he's oh so clever and smart, but he's really just stupidly underestimating other people's intelligence and tolerance.
If people cannot be trusted to distinguish between information and misinformation, and you are a person, how can you then say that you have determined that the BBC documentary Modi has banned is not misinformation? Either people have to be shepherded through the library or they don't.
How is a calculator going to cause harm? Assuming you get an industrially rated circuit board when appropriate, it should work just fine as a PLC.

If you try to make it drive a car, I wouldn't call that a problem of giving it too much power.
These numbers are really bad for both AMD and Intel, honestly. It suggests that the x86 server/desktop monopoly is getting crushed in a major way.
> If yall want everyone to use Tokio then tell me why … it's the de-facto community standard.
> I want some group with authority to bless a core async runtime implementation…

Hmm, if Tokio is the de-facto community standard, isn’t that saying that the authority of “people who write and run async code for actual production systems” is blessing it as a preferred option?

> The reality is that the goal is not realized because Rust has not done the work to enable everyone to simply bring their own runtime

Or, another possibility is that it hasn’t been realized because building a robust, production-ready, well-maintained runtime is itself a lot of work, and Tokio is the only project that has actually done it.
Like many have said, this contains a ton of insightful valuable criticism.

That said, I take immense issue with the characterization of the "heroism bad" sentiment at Google:

> There are documents that explicitly and proudly deride “heroism” and assert that not only should product teams not encourage “heroes”, they should actively dissuade them. If someone chooses to work twice as hard as is expected of them, they usually will be prevented from doing so because they have to work with others and doing so would force the others to work harder too.

As it's been explained to me, this is actually a principle primarily around avoiding inefficient hard work to keep a system healthy, more of a "work smart not hard" thing. Being the only person on the team who can keep prod healthy is not valuable when you could get hit by a bus tomorrow, and this behavior doesn't scale well. That's the gist of the argument and I think it is a good one. His criticism of people not taking enough risk is apt but that's not what this particular piece of culture is about.
I think the Bigscreen Beyond is the best you'll get for that application this year: https://www.bigscreenvr.com/

Probably not yet high resolution enough for it to make sense, but higher than most alternatives, and the comfort and portability should be good.
It strikes me that my cat probably views my intelligence pretty close to how you describe a Myna bird. The full sum of my mental energy is spent mimicking cat conversations while clearly not understanding it. I'm pretty good at doing menial tasks like filling his dish and emptying his kitty litter, though.

Which is to say that I suspect that human cognition is less sophisticated than we think it is. When I go make supper, how much of that is me having desires and goals and acting on those, and how much of that is hormones in my body leading me to make and eat food, and my brain constructing a narrative about me wanting food and having agency to follow through on that desire.

Obviously it's not quite that simple - we do have the ability to reason, and we can go against our urges, but it does strike me that far more of my day-to-day life happens without real clear thought and intention, even if it is not immediately recognizable to me.

Something like ChatGPT doesn't seem that far off from being able to construct a personal narrative about itself in the same sense that my brain interprets hormones in my body as a desire to eat. To me that doesn't feel that many steps removed from what I would consider sentience.
Link: https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/ucla-seti-group/are-we-a...

I guess this serves some secondary purposes:

- Generating public interest (which helps them stay funded, recruit long term, and so on)

- Provide training data for machine vision.
You can't extinguish an ideology, and someone who has been murdered is already murdered even if you do.

By your insane logic, we should put kids out on the street by themselves to catch child predators.

Sometimes the safety of the threatened party is more important than finding out who wants to harm them.
Remember that this isn't AGI, it's a language model. It's repeating the kind of things seen in books and the Internet.

It's not going to find any novel exploits that humans haven't already written about and probably planned for.
> No, and I wouldn’t call Datalog a dialect of Prolog either necessarily. It’s more like, classic Datalog syntax looks Prolog-ish (similar syntax, and is kind of a subset of Prolog).

Datalog originated specifically as a restricted subset of Prolog, which is why the “classic” syntax looks prolog-ish.

> Basically, Prolog can do more than Datalog. Datalog is like, some subset of concepts of Prolog, but specialized for relational data queries, so it can achieve some optimizations and focus on data retrieval only.

Datalog is a purely declarative, non-Turing complete subset of Prolog, removing the imperative features and assuring termination. This gives up lots of power, obviously, but it also, well, provides a termination guarantee. Removing imperative features (cut) from Prolog also means that Datalog implementations can use different (or multiple, switchable) strategies, while differing in what kinds of data sets and queries they perform well on, not correctness.
That isn't my recollection at all, can you provide an example of a mainstream publication or politician attaching "he shouldn't be so provactive" to their support. And if you can't, why would you go on believing it?
> [SBF] is operating as though he were smarter and more special than everyone around him

I mean, let's be honest among ourselves: in IT this sort of psychological profile is table stakes.
I would be _very_ surprised if it had. The limited observations I have suggest a very stable community. Not growing, not shrinking.
That was a fascinating read. For the period reported, US derailments, while still way higher than in other places, have declined 60%, whereas they've been pretty constant elsewhere. A huge factor seems to be the weight of US rail car loads and train sizes, which are substantially heavier and longer than those elsewhere in the world.
That is too bad, it does mention `-fno-schedule-insns2` in the comments. I'll have to see how well that works in practice.

Having high quality low cost stack straces is important for continuous profiling. ref Knuth.
Pro-tip: I used to curse my bike: the chain fell off all the time, the gears slipped, the shifting was fiddly, the brakes were crap. Then I, by luck[1], stumbled on owning a more expensive mountain bike, and things stopped failing. Cheap bikes are crap.

[1]: I bought a mid-price mountain bike, nothing fancy, in the era before rear suspension was common. It got stolen within a year. I was part of my parents' grandfathered insurance plan that had unbelievably good coverage for bicycle theft. Insurance replaced the bike with one that had all the same features. Not price matching, matching checklist features. Number of gears, etc. It ended up having some extra features, too, because that was what was in the inventory. After that bike was also stolen within a year, they replaced that with one that had all the features that were in the second one. Plus disc brakes, plus many others, because nothing else fulfilled the checklist. The price of my bike more than doubled in two years. No, you can't get that insurance anymore.
Charge for the melting, not the method used to achieve the melting.
Is sorting one of those things that’s so common that it deserves its own CPU hardware/instructions to aid in performance?

Or does AVX-512 provide a lot of what that would theoretically be?
It may be but I didn't start it though, you did. :^)
And the electric bill.
Different position worked for my partner - the sidelying position. Otherwise she found she was having to lift him up higher than was comfortable for any length of time.
The first people on mars will be self replicating robots. Due to the way the exponential function works - I think enough terraforming could be done really fast.
Sigh, every single time this comes up, people gloss over the part of freedom of speech that involves free association.

I’m free to say, “i hate <thing>”, and you’re free to refuse to associate with me as a result of that. It’s so simple. The government can’t, but you can.

As long as we all agree with that, then yeah freedom of speech is great, you just don’t get to stop applying it when you feel satisfied.
So what you dislike is groups of people coordinating their speech, it appears. How is this any different from coordination using price signals?
A way to make employers feel better about giving less money even when the employees are the reason the employer is what it is.
Reminds me of the various "what if all memory was non-volatile" that made the rounds when Intel Optane entered the stage. A bit like the inverse of this, but the caveats might turn out similar: in one case you'd still want a well-defined resettable area, in the other case you'd still want to avoid having to deal with arbitrarily long addresses which would at some point become as bad as seek times even if hypothetically seek times in the stricter sense did not exist.
I am getting old: I read the description two times and checked examples yet still don't understand the utility. I do understand Midjourney prompt engineering though.
No, not "in the middle of the city"

In the middle of your neighborhood.