skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> And what precisely are they going to do to him if they find out?

Who are "they" in your question. I'm assuming you mean they===namedCorp. I am not thinking those lines at all. The "they" that I'm thinking of is anyone else that might possibly be interested, for the lulz or just practice/fun/games, to find out the info. The fact that a new anon account was created means the OP didn't want it tied to their real account for whatever reasoning they had, yet pretty much laid out a red carpet for someone to walk it back. Okay, maybe not a red carpet, but definitely a better trail than Hansel & Gretel left.
Russia could have done it in a “burn the ships, no way out but forward” type of move. Putin might have been worried by a coup attempt by a faction that wished to restore gas deliveries. There is a lot of very rich and very unhappy oligarchs in Russia.

That being said, it’s almost certainly done by NATO as a punishment to Germany for having gone against everyone else who told them these pipelines were a dangerous tool of russian influence/blackmail.
This is the general issue in large companies with open source projects. They don't want to devote time to maintain.
You do not call security updates that you get to your computer a recall of your computer, do you?
Rather confusing when here is already:

https://www.nodebox.net/
Even that summary was too long, so I asked ChatGPT for the one line version:

Creators are overemphasizing their unique perspective and not focusing enough on the process and practice of their craft, leading to concerns about AI tools replacing them.
For languages that support Unicode identifiers, you could zalgo-ify the name to increase the friction:

|

|

d̜̣͎̱̟̥͓̥͍̙͖̫̓̀͗̌̚a͍̩̫̳͖̒̒́́͐̍́̍̏͋̿̈n̳̯̫̥̞͗̒̆͗̀͒͒͌̒̎g͉̝̠̝̠͉̰̘͉̩͖͙̾͐̽̂̈́͗ë̗̙̳̮̘̟͙͇̣͇́̐͑̈́͂̾́̇̇̀͒ŕ̗̱̜͚̌̔̓̄̄͒́̄͌̚_̱̭͍̣̳̝͓͔͖͓̀̃͒̑̊͛͛̽̑͋̿͒ͅd͉̰̖͎̰̙̘̰͈̫̃̍́̋̆̀̓͆̈́̓̇̾a̭̦̲̫͕̩͔͙͔͖̱̿̑͌̊͌̾̊͂́͂̉ň͖͔̩͓̮̦̭̜̩͉́̀̍́̑g̖̦͙̝̈͆͗̈̄́̉̽͗̄͆́ȅ̠͔͕̜͔̇͗̊̈́r͎̬̦͈͈͐͑̃̄̀͒̉̓̋_̪̝͔͖̠̘̰͛̂́̔̆́̓̅͒t̖̘̟̝͚̭̦̪͕̘͐̎̋̈̍̋̾̈́̇̈́̉̚ḣ̙͇̝̳͓͇̮̫͙͈͍͊̇͌e̳̖̯̥̭̜͓̜̒̉̎̒_̥̱̲̘̞͓̖̣̝̮̮̌͌̅̀͊̅̍̑̿̂̿ͅp̗͖̘̝͈͙̫͖͍̠͑̎̃̍͌̇͋̍͋͗͑͛o͉̬̗̠̝̗͈̟̘̱̬̫͗̽͆̊́̂̚n͚̪̰͉̪̟̈́͛̓͒͌̎̑́̒̃͌͆ͅy̞̗͖̗̾̂̿̿̀̊͋͐̓̓̚_̜̲͖̣͈̞͖͎͆͑͌̾̃͆ͅh̦̘͇͍͓͕͒̎̒̽͂̊̐̍e͎̰̲̥̱͍̗͉̞͔̦̬̊̌͆́_̲͚̮̮̙͇̠̮͖͐́̎͆̿̄̋c̙̩͈͇̩̯̠͇͙̄̄̒̄̓͑͂͗̈͂̊̚o̪̥̲̗͓̭͍̣̮͙͉͇̽͊̿̔m̫̖̘̰̆̊̒̃̔͛͛̚ẻ͓̭͓̗̙̳͖̭͚̐̀̃́̃s͖͈̬͚̜͊̐͗̓̂͑̀͑̔̿͌͒

|

|

(Yes this is actually a valid Unicode identifier.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zalgo_text
And these only include the nightly rate, not the total rental amount?
They may still be able to offer optimized decoding with hardware support on older devices. Not a full hardware path but a very well optimized CPU + hardware combo.
An interesting thought experiment is:

1. How would you make email addresses domain/host agnostic?

2. What would the migration path look like?

This would enable portability similar to how you can port a phone number DID between carriers.
"continuously developed since 2005" last commit 9 years ago lol
Pre-eternal September usenet was great, we just needed better anti-spam solutions than killfiles.
so well vetted that issues keep happening, so well vetted that a OTA "software patch" is raised to the level of automotive recall. if you call that misinformation, then, "boy, i don't know".
Good timing, I've been trying to compile a list like this myself to keep track of everything released.
And then you need to cache something to disk, at which point you either plumb a callback all the way into your onion or give up.

Mathematics doesn't manage to get things done in this manner. One of the key distinctions between programming and mathematics is that programs can do things and math just is.
In a world where inflation >0%, wouldn't we expect almost every day to set a record for "most debt ever"?
Every time I play a mobile game I regret it. They are just built differently and a terrible substitute for anyone actually interested in gaming.
What about peripherals and latency?
Can I purchase some of these for my house?
I'm designing a Chinese learning app and I'd mostly agree with this. My working hypothesis though? Most adult learners don't have the time/patience for massive/lengthy exposure, so grammar lessons are a shortcut to "feeling" like they're making progress.

I think it's a mistake to discount the psychology of learning. It's like saying that "calories-in, calories-out" is all there is to weight-loss. Strictly true, but not helpful for 90% of people.
If you're stuck in a time tube and perceive the world as it was in 2005, Hersh is one of the more important journalists in the world. I don't deny that. I only deny that the Jews are attempting to start WW3 in Iran, that Opus Dei runs USSOCOM, that the US faked the UBL raid in Pakistan (and in fact the ISI had UBL for years prior), and that Syria's Sarin attacks on their own people were faked by the US. Oh, also that the US got the Norwegian Navy to put a minesweeper in the Baltic Sea as a diving platform for US divers to blow up a pipeline that wasn't shipping any gas to Germany.

If you're still in 2005, I have great news for you: you've got one more amazing season of the Wire ahead of you, and 5 whole seasons of a show called Breaking Bad --- take my word on this, it's going to be amazing. You can skip The Wire S5 though.
what about trademark infringement?
I have a method in our Java app`iKnowWhatImDoingGiveMeTheSession()` that will only work if you have set the system property `doYouReally=Yes, I really know what I'm doing`

It should never be used in production, but can be helpful to have available when doing certain kinds of investigation.
Can you do setup single-threaded (or get back to being single-threaded at the end of setup) and fork before starting each test case?

If you need multiple service processes up and running, can you make them less stateful to get around some of your test limitations?
I mean, I can tell a just-so-story as well. It's just that, like your explanation, it involves Putin making what seems to me to be a dumb decision.

Some parts of game theory emphasizes ostentatious signaling that you can't turn back (e.g. 'win the game of chicken by clearly throwing your steering wheel out of the car before the game starts, so the other person KNOWS you can't turn' line of reasoning, which is stupid but some people occasionally try- the most famous successful example is of course Cortes burning his ships). In support of that, it's possible Putin was afraid of a coup: shortly before the invasion, he made each and every member of the cabinet get up on national TV (recorded to tape and broadcast a few hours later) and give a speech about why the war was a great idea and just the thing for Russia, that seems consistent with preventing an anti-war clique from trying to seize power if the war became unpopular, because you had everyone even close to power on the record, before the war, as major cheerleaders for it. If Shoigu or Lavrov or whomever try to seize power in a coup, banking on ending an unpopular war to give them legitimacy, they have to explain away those speeches and their full-throated support of the war back in 2/2022.

Similarly, ostentatiously destroying the pipelines in a way that will take months to fix even if you wanted to removes the ability of a coup to win goodwill and legitimacy with Europe by immediately turning on the pipeline and letting the CH4 flow. Is it what motivated the bombing? I don't know. Does Putin fear a coup by his senior people? I mean in the vague sense that all dictators are aware that it's a threat, certainly. But is he actually taking steps to prevent it? I dunno. Is this explanation plausible? I dunno, but I wouldn't bet my life on it. Is it just as plausible as the US or Poland or Norway or Ukraine or even Germany blowing up the pipeline? That I do think is a clear yes. Which is why I paraphrased that analyst before, none of the explanations really seem plausible, but one of them has to be true.
This just isn’t nearly as compelling as the U.S. wanting to blow it up to prevent Germany from even having the option of using it.
More logical to use a textbox typically reserved for navigating away from the current page, to instead search that page?
I was asking it some medical related questions today and I had the same thought. “What are some medical conditions that could cause constant fatigue, a weak immune system, and circulation issues resembling Reynauld’s syndrome?”

To which is could reply “Does the patient have skin lesions or joint pain?” to eliminate possibilities.
But feeding into a proprietary product isn’t good for us. Using Google and Photoshop as verbs isn’t great as is, but Git by its nature as a DVCS it becomes even more important we don’t have our language drift in a way that centralizes. Specifying that it is Git is even of questionable value.

“Are there any samples with the source available“ is a better phrasing (minimal and self-contained aren't implied by naming a platform).
Be specific. Which of the arguments in this do you find "poorly constructed"?
“Search through historical cookbooks!”

*looks for recipes*

“No not like that”
You could always bake the cmdline into the kernel itself, but that would mean recompiling the kernel each time. (Although if that's the only change, that shouldn't take too long)
There's a difference between "provoke" and "belittle", though.

I don't think I would feel too bad about myself if I had to call a method starting with "i_suck_", but I can understand and sympathize with people for whom having to type in that method name would strike right at their impostor syndrome.

The question is, of course: should we cater to those latter people? The author of this Ruby code clearly thinks not (or didn't think about it at all). I think that we (or at least I) should.
Just based on their responses in this article thread, he's a Tesla apologist, if he doesn't work there, it's impressive volunteed work.
quote from article: "The Ford engine ran until its spark plugs gave out a few years ago and a newly installed fuel cell—quieter and more efficient—has not yet been hooked into the village grid. Bourakébougou is dark, waiting for a hydrogen future to arrive."

They couldn't replace a few spark plugs?
Nobody is talking about process for the first feature. Not in this conversation, not in the real world. That's all you.

There's always a reason why we should do feature n+1 the same way we did feature n. At some point you have to say stop.

You also have to realize that the 'will there be a company around' talk is usually a fiction that gets more work out of the developers. It's a rallying cry, not a statement of fact. Companies run on momentum much of the time. The moment you died isn't the moment the money ran out. It's the moment you didn't avert the money running out. See also 'default dead'. There's a lot of ways to kill a company. Loss of velocity is one of them, and that is dictated most often by tech debt and morale. Eventually the people good at cleaning up messes get tired of only cleaning up messes, and they burn out or leave.
I'd suggest you take a look at their latest financials. They clearly have a viable, large, and soon-to-be profitable business (if so desired).
> It is almost always the same crowd, that boo the officers for doing their job when they have to use force.

I disagree, and think it’s quite telling that you feel this way. Most people I know would love for the police to do their job and use the force that they and only they are authorised to use (here in Aus) to retrieve stolen private property. But they don’t. Best they’ll do is file a report so you can claim it on insurance if you’re lucky enough to have it.
Google fixed this for flight search years ago. Do they show wrong prices for hotels?
Which of the "OSINT" arguments in this blog post do you find implausible?
Ditch Inspect Element and Find CSS Styles with CSS Scanner
As a web dev and amateur designer even I get tired of looking at inspect element - so when i couldn't find a good alternative I made one.
Tokyo actually does have rules about shadows: new building plans have to show how the new building will affect the sunlight of neighboring buildings. I think there's some limitations along these lines, but not a lot. But yeah, you can make your building as ugly as you want.

Anyway, those older, ugly, poorly-maintained buildings eventually get torn down and replaced with something better, because the land value is very high. It's much more laissez-faire than the US and property rights are much, much stronger (the idea that you should mostly be able to do what you want with your property).
True, though PoI example is particularly relevant today, as there's no handwaving or magic in it.

The AI in question worked around its memory limit by employing data entry people to print out some documents full of gibberish, and retype them again some time later. Those people were paid to do a job, and didn't know or particularly care about its purpose. The whole setup was a simple loop - but a loop is sometimes all you need to get a provably-limited computing system into full Turing-completeness.

This scene bears striking resemblance to an observation I saw mentioned on HN several times over the past two days: we are already giving some of those bots something that could function as near-infinite long-term memory, simply by posting transcripts of our conversations on-line.

The idea isn't entirely new - people have been saying for a while now that posting AI-generated content on-line will lead to future models training on their own output. The new bit is that we are now having bots that can run web searches and read the results. Not train on the results, but make them part of their short-term memory. That's a much shorter feedback loop. If a bot can reliably get us to publish conversation transcripts, and retrieve them in future conversations, then it gains long-term memory in the same way Person of Interest shown us all those years ago.
>> The fear, however, was that the bombs wouldn’t work if they stayed in the water too long. This is actually what happened with two of the bombs.

> Seriously? The world's largest military hasn't developed explosive devices that are sufficiently waterproof?

The OP might be referring to the triggering mechanism running out of battery and thus unable to receive the triggering signal, rather than to water exposure.
Good documentation tells you a lot more than the source could. Especially when you're talking about horrific side-effects.
Every single one has an English curse word.
I'd argue you're better off with macOS + something like Parallels or, if you just need ubuntu, multipass. Introducing Windows to get a Linux-compliant environment is reaching around your back to scratch your elbow.
Has global warming been systematically suppressed by pro corporate media for 50 years?

Yes.

So really, the news is that it isn't 100% of Americans.
I don't think companies are willing to handle the liabilities of "throwing people off". Probably just slowing it down to an unusable level.
Disgusting is harsh, but it does look weird. It makes me think of some kind of single-celled organism or maybe an upside down turkey head and neck.
My goto build system is:

- make

- Google's closure compiler (standalone Jar)

- imagemagick

It builds fast and never goes out of date.
lsof provides this information
This isn't specific to any organization. If you want this thing to keep going, you can maintain it anywhere; it's not tied to github.com/nasa in any way.

I'm the sole maintainer of another open source project at NASA. I'm super stoked about it, and because of that the project will live, not because of anything NASA does. It doesn't live at github.com/nasa, which is a good thing: if I leave, I get to take it with me. Every place I've ever worked (including NASA) doesn't care about open software one way or another: if you want to release stuff and maintain it publically, you can. They don't care.
Oh my god how I want a uint64, including in Postgres.

The limited datatypes are so silly, and the limits seem pretty pointless. There's all kinds of weird datatypes, but no unsigned integers?

Of course, SQLite types are a special level of hell, where everything is stringly typed.
> work

Fair. Maybe another way to put what I'm trying to say is that "the code works" isn't the most important thing when, in the problem context, "works" is a fuzzy / non-binary state. Example: The code for each of the blue checks "worked", buuuuut.

> they have me on an obscene day rate for a 60 day

Oh god totes fair. I will fall back on the twin defenses of "users != clients" and "explain != convince to budget for".

> refactor

Do you find that better tested code is more easily refactored?

Kinda where I'm going: I generally wouldn't consider "this needs to be refactored" an inherent mark of missing that mark, as that can also come from changed needs and requirements. But I would expect "hitting the mark" to result in code that's easy to refactor (and that's part of how I define the mark that I, personally, aim for).

Edit: to more clearly define my goal posts; better tested != fully tested. IME too many people don't hold their test code to a good standard; so IMO "better tested" also means that the test code itself is also "hitting the mark" (or close to it).
Hmm I think it's sort of a hybrid.

First off, we know that overall the concept of language is humans is an emergent phenomenon. It developed from natural selection from simple components so there's validity that the same thing can occur in an LLM where some overarching emergent structure develops from simple primitives.

At the same time we do know that a sort of universal grammar exists among humans. Our language capacity is biased in a certain way and that it is unlikely for it to learn languages of a very extreme and divergent grammar from the universal one discovered by Noam chomsky. That means our brain is unlikely to be as universally simple as an LLM.

I think the key here is that the human mind has explicit linguistic tools but the these tools are still emergent in nature.
yup. even boron steel cuts pretty quickly
If the universe is infinite in size (given that measurement is close to the topology being flat), or time is infinite in the future, then no. Or there is an infinite multiverse (take your pick of which one).
There have certainly been functions that were necessary for some kinds of apps, but there are possibilities for kinds of PWAs that would have worked for years on iOS (and Android/desktop) but they barely exist if at all.

Unless some (unknown to me and possibly everyone) change happens and PWAs explode in popularity… there’s going to have to be a reckoning that end users just don’t seem to care/want them.

They can still be useful but the dream of abandoning the app stores (due to PWAs) just doesn’t feel realistic to me.
Absconded means to leave in a secret hurry, not to take something. If you put 'money he absconded with' that would make sense.
Sounds similar to America, no more enemy to focus on, will begin to eat their own
How can he say that ‘we don’t know what they are’ and at the same time say ‘we are sure they aren’t Chinese’? It doesn’t make any sense!
I tried a basic query: what chemicals were spilled in the n crash.

I was unable within my patience to find this information.

I finally got it from, of all things, the young Turks, something I watch maybe once every three months.
They might be bumping into old versions of utilities up to just before GPLv3.

From GPLv3 onwards, Apple has had to leave installation of newer versions of tools to users, legally, our publish their own proprietary IP, Stallman’s objective some would say.
Theory is good. Not sure calling it a study in a headline is a good idea though.
There’s a section called “Difference with WebContainers” on the announcement
Completely agree with you. It's ruining statistical analysis of actual crime and it's developing serious apathy and nihilism in our population.
Are the police good-humored? Or is it not on the form, but a quip to poke fun at law enforcement, or at common bike "borrowing" in the city?
They're very close actually, at least at stock frequency.

https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_9_7900_proce...

Both Intel 12900k and AMD 7900 are 78W idle.

So it's basically neck-and-neck on idle power because those CPUs are around the same performance.

Where the power usage is crazy different is multicore load, 320W for the Intel vs 158W for AMD.

edit: actually an AMD 7900X is 299W on MC load. A 7900X is 15% faster on MC than a 7900. So Intel and AMD seem quite similar on power usage.
Another fun way is to gradually lock up the front wheel of the bike so it gets harder and harder to balance on it. If gradually enough this may be enough to convince thief it's just broken or bad.
Good as a joke, but even better - we were all on Linux
It also depends how you process your documents to create embedding(s). The open-source tensor search project [marqo](https://github.com/marqo-ai/marqo) does a great job of dealing with these type of fixed attention window problems.
I think it's reasonable to invoke Chesterton's Fence here. We have to fully understand the potential consequences before enacting something potentially rife with unintended consequences before dismantling a system.

We've lived with Zoning over a century and we ought to have an understanding of what unwanted changes could come about if that were suddenly lifted. It's not that we _should not_ do it but we should make changes in a measured, purposeful and understood manner so we don't end up like unregulated favelas (not in the sense of being mostly poor, but in the sense that anything goes.)
A 3U really opens things up for possibilities:

- Full-height PCI cards fit (though some GPUs have taller than full-height coolers; if the HS/F protrudes above the mounting bracket, you'll have to measure).

- You can use larger fans, which can help a lot with airflow and/or noise. Just throw away the fans that come with the case as anything designed for a rack assumes you'll be wearing hearing protection while working around it.

- More motherboard options. If you use a power-supply designed for rack-mount, standard ATX motherboards fit fine. If you want to use a desktop power supply there are plenty of micro-ATX options.
> no more choice between different kernels in case the newest one broke something

Ah, I see. That's a deal breaker for me. Switching to an older kernel has saved me many times, usually when I completely mess up my nvidia drivers.
It already is rising, with all the false positives and prejudice induced mistakes you would expect. A Kenyan I know said vigilantism there relies on setting up bait for thieves and having multiple members of the community lie in wait. The thief that takes the bait is caught red handed, beaten severely, and often doused in petrol and burned alive. I said I was sure that probably kept theft pretty low, and he replied it did not, no one ever thinks they will be caught.
Indeed. I miss AMD and tooling from that time, it was all pretty straightforward and browser focused. Combined with PHP and you could do some pretty neat things, too.
RightWingGPT – An AI Manifesting the Opposite Political Biases of ChatGPT
The point is to recognize the humans on the receiving end of your judgement. They aren't inherently bad people. There was a series of events that led them to where they are, just like you. They are capable of all the same things you are.

Once you recognize that these people are human, you have a chance at maybe effecting some kind of change. Looking at them as animals means you will never effect any positive change, and you'll probably contribute to an even worse us-against-them kind of environment.
A counter project to Stackblitz's web-containers?
"I have to say, I do sometimes miss learning tech stuff from books. While it's all online and in theory up to date, there is something to be said for the curated experience of a book."

I miss the times when you could read K&R, one of Stroustroup's books and an STL book and you pretty much knew most of what there was to know.
Is this still ok in today's over-sensitive environment where "blacklist" files are taboo. (Btw, "blacklist" comes from British chimney cleaners).
U.S. Robotics and Mechanical Men, but it isn’t a real company ;-)