skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
On top of that, the "Adderall shortage" isn't from a lack of supply: it's from the DEA arbitrarily deciding to constrain the amount that drugmakers may legally manufacture; despite a significant increase in diagnosis.

It's all bullshit politics driven by the same thoughtless sentiment we see here.
I think if a lot of computer enthusiasts had been born say 70 years earlier than they were, they would've been gearheads--auto enthusiasts--instead.
I don't know about anyone else but I've been patiently waiting for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D since the 5800X3D came out. The gaming performance on that chip was so good that it was competitive with more expensive chips at the time, despite being slower for productivity workloads. My 4790k is starting to show it's age when playing games like Rimworld and Elden Ring.
Interesting in those tables that VIA isn't even a rounding error anymore.
I never got sealants but did get fluoride treatment and brushing twice a day as a kid. I never had a cavity either and even as an adult I can maybe count the number of cavities I had on one hand. (And I brushed my teeth maybe once a day, don't judge me.) Honestly my diet played a huge role here, but the sealants, fluoride, and twice daily brushing just give you so much more protection than you could expect from brushing alone.
Good suggestion; I just finished Dyson's Turing's Cathedral*, and it certainly suggests that von Neumann was as, or more, into (what would become) systems than (what would become) theory.

> "All stable processes we shall predict. All unstable processes we shall control." — JvN

* in which I learned, among many other things, about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klára_Dán_von_Neumann 's hacking skill.
NASA isn't in the business of sabotaging, that would be the CIA. That means that

1. NASA cares about keeping the ISS alive, the CIA might have other priorities and care more about how this humiliates Russia much more than NASA

2. I would be more surprised if there were no CIA agents in the manufacturing pipeline of Soyuz spacecraft, never mind the launch site. Just strategically weaken some parts so they fail in orbit.

3. So let's use CIA operatives

I'm not saying it was the CIA. The CIA has motive and capability to do it. But it could as well be Russian corruption somewhere in the supply chain, or just bad luck
That makes sense but it also strikes me as what I feel Haskell is like; it is so wrapped up in the ivory tower and preventing runtime bugs that it's hard to get actual work done. In TS, I also have not had runtime crashes but I'm able to use the vast array of packages for JS (which usually have TS types too nowadays) and get done what I wanted to. If I had to do the same in Elm but with much fewer packages, I mean sure I could reinvent the wheel but it doesn't bring us business value.
I am waiting for DDR5 prices to normalise. Simple.
Perhaps it’s time to approach the problem differently. Here’s what I propose:

If a new HTML element is not supported in browsers with broad usage *but* those browsers are deemed insecure and no longer supported, go ahead.
I'm not sure what's worse, the intelligence agencies brazenly breaking the law and violating the Constitutional rights of US citizens on a daily basis or those who crawl out of the gutter to defend these abuses.
The foreskins are used for expensive skin rejuvenation cosmetics and other high end products.

Modern circumcision is evil. The foreskin is analogous to the clitorus. It is filled with nerve endings and keeps the head skin from keratinizing (hardening and losing sensitivity).

Biblical circumcision was a notch in the foreskin. It was not the radical removal of it entirely.
Now imagine it using the tone of voice Pyle used in Full Metal Jacket right before the unpleasantness in the washroom.
This is fair, but also if the supervolcano goes up, you have also lost the national park.

I wonder if this would be a good case to try various concepts for including nature in our engineering design. How much could we ensure is zero emission, mostly underground, and reducing impact to plants and animals.
Not sure why you are being downmodded, there's no need for "Russian" to be in the title here.

This is a very common trope from alt-right media. If the culprit is ever black, Muslim, or an immigrant, they will absolutely let you know in the headline.
The relationship between SSRIs and suicidality is well established, as I understand it (but then, the relationship between the condition SSRIs treat and suicidality is even more well established).

I didn't think that was the case with homicidality, though. I went looking, and I found a lot of nutbag sources saying it was the case; that's no surprise, the claim has become a political football in the US (it's an attempted rationale for our mass shooting problem).

Are there very reputable sources to suggest that SSRIs cause homicidal ideation? It's a big claim.

(A quick note: for me, the first Google result is a BMJ journal hit --- but it appears to be a "letter to the editor" type situation, and opens "The FDA admitted in 2007 that SSRIs can cause madness at all ages and that the drugs are very dangerous; otherwise daily monitoring wouldn’t be needed".)
Right, it seems like you're advocating ChatGPT as an information retreival tool, which seems perfectly acceptable. Looking up exact dates and names is tedious.

By "filling in the details" I thought you were referring more generally to the essay writing process, where the structure of an essay is its skeleton and the "details" are the just as essential pieces of argumentation and evidence.

If you write a sociology, history, or philosophy essay, for example, writing the high level structure (intro, topic-sentence 1, topic-sentence 2, ..., conclusion) and then outsourcing the rest would be intellectually bankrupt. You can't understand produce a synthesis argument of Hume's The Wealth of Nations and Theory of Moral Sentiments with ChatGPT.
Many do this mistake to consider "Russia" instead of just Putin, those two entities interests do not align, so shit that might not make sense for Russia to do might make perfect sense for Putin to do.

We had the cases where instead of admitting that their warship was hit Putin regime pushed the narrative that it was just Russian incompetence.

So for sure it makes no sense for Russia to want their popes sabotage, but I am not sure about Putin, I can't understand his thinking, wither I am missing some information or his mind got corrupted by his own propaganda.
The best chip production is going to smartphones. PC processors drain my battery and are slow compared to a GPU. So why would I spend money on a new PC or new PC processor?
> A 16" laptop with no dedicated graphics card is exactly what I would prefer.

OK, so you are not interested in games, machine learning, 8k60, or any other thing that depends on a dedicated GPU.

But you are willing to blow $2000 on a laptop. That's a very niche situation.
Douglas Adams was more of a visionary than I thought
> It's readily available public information. As far as "widely known," I guess that's true.

It's even worse: even when people do ingest available information, they very often do it erroneously, forming a misunderstanding (without realizing it).

> Most people haven't really nerded out on the details of how pilots maintain combat readiness and how budgets work, but uh, your point?

Broadly: humanity runs mostly on untrue stories, and does not realize it (actually, there's a "it's even worse' here too).

>> anything that has the potential to wake up the American/Western public from their dream state is a good thing in my books

> I'm not exactly the biggest fan of any government, but what specifically are you talking about here?

Simplistically: people's understanding and trust in their government (abstract and concrete), and what is going on in general is highly erroneous, and not only do they not realize this, they believe the opposite. I consider this to be an extremely dangerous state of affairs, despite it having always been the case and "we're doing ok" nonetheless. Things often go "ok" for a very long time, and then suddenly start going "not ok", often without an obvious trigger.

> What is the "dream state" that these incursions might shatter?

The phenomena resulting from the combination of consciousness + culture + time, both individually and collectively.

You might be best served by filing this under "woo woo" though...but then again, you also might not - there's only one way to (possibly) find out!
I agree that they were doomed by that point as well primarily due to Linux on faster and cheaper x86 hardware. My UltraSPARC-III-based Blade 1500 that was an incredibly overpriced workstation that only ran Solaris well, and wasn't on par with the performance of x86 at the time.

However, I do remember buying an Opteron-based Ultra 20 because it was cheaper from Sun than anyone else and had 100% Linux support, which everyone seemed to be migrating to from Solaris. By that time, I'm sure there was no clear market direction for Sun software- or hardware-wise, and everything was too little too late.
Great points! But I want to quibble with this a bit.

> To be honest, the idea that you can produce valuable intellectual work by outsourcing the details is absurd.

It is absurd. But it's also very common! There are an awful lot of people who have done very well not by understanding anything, but by posturing and performing. E.g., take the ghostwritten book. The books of many politicians from all parties could generously be called mediocre. But they don't need to create valuable intellectual work; they just need something anodyne and book-shaped with their name on it.

Surprisingly often, people get away with this kind of absurdity, especially when rich and/or powerful. Indeed, one of the fascinating things for me about Musk's ongoing clown show at Twitter is that we're getting a real-time look at what happens when somebody who refuses to contend with the details fools themself into thinking they know what's going on.

That totally matches my experience where Architecture Astronauts have free reign. They are rewarded not for making this work, but talking impressively about big things. So what they produce is a lot of talk. When it's implemented by actual developers, does it work out well? Usually not! But that doesn't matter, because the people who empower them are also people who talk impressively about big things without understanding them.
What's missing is that they did not use the test set during the training process.

A common split is train/validate/test, but all three are used during training -- train to actually train, validate for intermediate loss, test for model comparison.

What you want is a fourth, held-out test set that isn't looked at until publish time.

This paper has two test sets, but they have different data properties, and it's not clear they were held out until publication.
My 8 year old asks you to look at from a different angle and evaluate what it can actually do right now.

I would add, just because someone made a prognostication decades ago does not invalidate the same prognostication now.

Have you tried it?
> Abortion is completely banned in Kentucky because of a new law that went into effect June 24, 2022. It is legal to travel out of state to get an abortion. [0]

> Exceptions that may allow you to get an abortion in Kentucky
To save the pregnant person's life
To prevent serious risk to the pregnant person's physical health

[0] - https://www.abortionfinder.org/abortion-guides-by-state/abor...
I can’t see myself needing a CPU upgrade for a long time. I used Ivy Bridge for a decade, and my Ryzen is far far more powerful.

Right now the only compute upgrade I need is a GPU and I think that applies to a lot of people.
> Yeah, everybody upgraded their WFH office setups in the prior two years, now no one needs a new pc. We’re going to be good for a while.

Also, it feels like phones have entered that "Core 2 Duo" PC stage where upgrades don't really matter as much any more. I know software support can still be an issue, but at least on the iPhone side, I don't feel like I need to upgrade before my phone loses OS support.
That made sense for documents, and maybe even web apps before the rise of component-based web libraries that make it easier to collocate HTML, JS, and styles in reusable components.
From what I've heard these leaks were caused by a micrometeor impact, but I am not up there checking myself...

https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/science/micrometeoroid-str...
To be fair, there are also metal gates, probably aluminum... but they only close after 8pm. I think it's more for aesthetics really. The communities in Palm Beach County miss the mark on being bad & boujee.
Maybe a little played-out, but I've been having a blast with the rust-bert library this weekend: https://github.com/guillaume-be/rust-bert

With a little fanagling, you can get the GPT-Neo-1.3b model running on those free Oracle ARM VMs. I'm impressed, especially with the performance of the smallest model that uses less than a gig of memory.
Do you think AI will ever be able to write a good song?(2019)
“ that what we are actually listening to is a withdrawn and alienated young man’s journey out of the small American town of Aberdeen – a young man who by any measure was a walking bundle of dysfunction and human limitation – a young man who had the temerity to howl his particular pain into a microphone and in doing so, by way of the heavens, reach into the hearts of a generation.”
LOL, love it!

Sadly too common that collecting new data is practically speaking impossible, because the actual collection process is underspecified.
It’s also basically what Thunderbird has now, though.
Them sweet FPS
Related: <selectmenu>

https://open-ui.org/prototypes/selectmenu
You may have misunderstood me. I meant it’s “continuously debated” the way the US moon landing is “continuously debated”.

There are those of us who accept reality, and also a highly vocal contingent of willful deniers who incessantly muddy the waters and obfuscate the truth.

I am also shocked and saddened by the comments in this thread, how foolish of me to have thought HN was above it.
> it will soon only happen via fees

The year 2140 isn't my definition of soon.
> It's not obvious what value ChatGPT has. Kind of controversial, but I think it's not actually obvious that ChatGPT is currently most used for funny Tweets, SEO optimization, and marketing tools. So I think he's not really saying much to get angry about here.

Or in other words, it is great at being a confident sophist and its use-case(s) are limited to almost nothing of serious use requiring explainability or trustworthiness; especially for legal, medical and financial applications or even search engines. If you cannot trust the output of an AI and it keeps hallucinating its answers, then what is the point?

If OpenAI was being 'responsible' or following 'responsible AI' guidelines, maybe they should be writing the detectors first before releasing ChatGPT, GPT-3 into the wild?

This AI hype cycle is no different to what happened with GPT-3 and it fizzled out just like how Clubhouse did. The only way is open source AI models.
> It seems like they are on a better track to profitability if their revenue rebounds a bit - i.e. if they get up to 80% of their previous revenue they will be operating that level of revenue with underlying profitably rather than operating unprofitably at their previously larger revenue figure.

No they won't, because there are an additional ~1.5 billion the company has to pay in interest, as a result of the takeover. Twitter has fluctuated around profitability the last few years, now they have an albatross in interest payments around their neck. The only way Musk can lead them to a "better track to profitability" is if he unlocks significantly more revenue. He's been going in the opposite direction so far.
Evidence etc?
Sure. If your kid is testing positive for a contagious diseases which killed over 6 million people worldwide and left many with long lasting effects, wouldn't common sense dictate that they should stay at home?
I don’t understand how this argument helps PureThink at all. Even if Neo4j is not allowed to refer to their license as “AGPLv3 with the commons clause as follows” then isn’t that between them and FSF?

PureThink isn’t a party to that dispute, and the inclusion of the clause was apparently stated at the beginning of the license that they are, presumably, subject to.

That said, what does look interesting to me is the whole ‘Additional Conditions’ section of AGPL which one could argue is still effective over what is written in the “Commons clause.” From that clause:

> Without limiting other conditions in the License, the grant of rights under the License will not include, and the License does not grant to you, the right to Sell the Software.

Since it does not limit the Additional Conditions section or say ‘notwithstanding’ that verbiage, then it seems it would still be subject to subsequent removal of the commons clause condition.
I don’t know what the context of this is (or its legitimacy), but what you’re implying is extremely offensive… especially to the Jewish members of my family who did fight in WWII under extremely anti-semitic leadership who would send them on missions first (not last!) that they thought were the most dangerous.
I hereby discount the possibility that this article is FUD put out by the pharmaceutical industry.
OpenVZ and Solaris Zones both came out in 2005; however OpenVZ was never accepted into the kernel.
Well, as with all logic systems you can only express correctness up to its granularity. Elm's type system is, as you mention, very rudimentary and basically just HM + reactive programming.

First, I don't write any serious applications in Elm, and would never do it. I don't find that it is productive because of the reasons you list. Just as I would never write any serious applications in Coq.

But with Elm, as with Coq, I can appreciate that their goals are not immediate developer productivity. Maybe some day when the ecosystems needed are fully implemented. Until then I just applaud everybody working on systems that are strongly typed and ensure that all their dependencies are.

I believe this will provide tremendous value – when ripe.
> They seem to be hyper focused on just presenting it as a replacement for ElasticSearch.

Probably it's because they think it's where money floats, seeing ES as a train to push them forward as well.

Not long time ago, ~ 2 years of so, had a case where dev team (okay, it was just 2 persons of developers) asked to setup ES to offload some searches from DB (mysql). I've asked why not using Sphinx/Manticore and one of the reasons they said they want ES is cuz in Laravel [php framework] they have some nice libs to work with it, while for Manticore it seemed to be more work for them. Quite shocking reasons from my POV, but real story.
I'm not asking for a tldr, and I don't need a point by point refutation of someone's personal experiences. I'm asking for them to write it in a more readable format. (Even you admit you skimmed it, and didn't really read it!)

It's missing the forest from the trees, and non persuasive to me.
There is no way someone quoting "the usual Russian incompetence" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34764133) is asking in good faith…
Didn't he shoot himself with a gun given to him as a gift? By a certain Fidel Castro? Who was something of a totalitarian dictator?

I mean, the leader of a democratic country having a totalitarian dictator as a dear fried doesn't prove he was plotting to destroy democracy, but it's kinda suggestive. And almost inevitably, by the time you get real proof, it's going to be too late to do anything about it.
Tangentially: What purpose does ISS serve today? It cost $150 billion to get to this point, but is it doing anything which justifies the operating and maintenance costs?

vs. other uses of the money. On Earth, direct replacement with new in-orbit infrastructure/new station, or other space operations.
This is also a thing in the diamond age! The book mentions that they have laws to regulate that packaging material has to be heavier than air to prevent floating garbage.
> Surely the the benefit of an example is to point out how hard it is to do the same thing in the old system compared to the other

I think the idea here is "how is you accomplish the end goal in each, using their normal way of doing things". For example, if you were going to build a sorter in C vs Smalltalk, you would use procedural code for C and object oriented code for Smalltalk. Both would show how a sorter would be built in the style of the language in question (vs building an object oriented approach in C).
Yes, this is the way to go. I found this was the easiest to use.
Glad I'm not the only one who thinks these developments are utterly unnerving. So many cautionary tales throughout history about the pitfalls of excess and ceding your autonomy, and the "smartest minds" on the Internet are the first ones salivating for this future.
If you're interested in this type of thing take a look at Holy Build box. It has a much more thorough write up on this stuff and an actual solution to boot.

For everyone else, just maintain a few docker images targeting the top linux distributions and move on with life.
You still need this stuff while people's diets change, though - diets generally have a good amount of cultural, religious, and family ties and it takes time.

Then there is the entire issue of trying to change the diets of poor people at a time when places (like the US) aren't even making sure the folks at the bottom can get enough calories and nutrients nor are we making sure diabetics and others have a diet fit for them, let alone trying to make sure folks aren't eating badly for their teeth.

And I'm sure I'm not considering things like changing the crops being planted and things like that.

But we have this stuff, perhaps. It isn't moronic considering we probably aren't going to change diets suddenly.
IRS builds task force to explore running its own free e-file system
This reads like a low-key, state-sponsored bot post on Twitter: spreading FUD under the guise of being “safe.” Iranians need to take back their country, they are already not safe.

At this point, the only transfer of power that will happen will be due to a hostile civilian takeover. The current regime will not abdicate and any foreign military coup will likely not be tolerated by the people.

A revolution will serve as a cautionary tale to future governments who attempt to push fundamentalism as law.
These are rather old sources (2010, 2013, 2018), not that I doubt the lobbying continues but that the there’s better things to focus on, gains to be made than chasing after soda SNAP expenditure edge cases.
> articles undermining the intelligence community

Why would they undermine themselves? These News Companies have _Expert_ IC individuals on payroll. If these articles had teeth wouldn't the embedded pro IC assets stop the undermining or would these individuals not be asked for their "opinion" on the articles prepublication?
Casting spying as the only means of international cooperation is disingenuous.
Depends on the industry and use-case. Some line-of-business apps might be designed without caring about any mobile/responsive usage. Others might be meant to be used at a specific workstation that has a computer as part of it (for example, the app might be controlling some equipment), or in some other environment in which mobile usage makes no sense.
* in mice
Is that bait? Adam Smith IIRC. Hume did Treatise on Human Nature.
Yeah but maybe unwinding 10,000 years of agriculture isn't very feasible.