skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I’m not convinced that’s true at all.
Another gem from the same repo - gosh - pure golang shell

This means anywhere golang is installed, including aarch64 Darwin and Windows you can:

go run mvdan.cc/sh/v3/cmd/gosh@latest

Or things like

go run mvdan.cc/sh/v3/cmd/gosh@latest -c 'echo "cross platform shell"; go run github.com/mikefarah/yq/v3@latest r metadata.name <(kubectl get pod my-pod -o yaml)'

Pretty awesome stuff, I'm always discovering new ways to use it.
About 12 years ago, I created a tool called IntelliCAPS, which intelligently converts ALL CAPS to mixed case. Basically, if the word is not in the dictionary, it assumes it's a proper noun and capitalizes it. It also recognizes some common acronyms and preserves them as all-caps. It's not perfect, but it's arguably more readable than the original.

Here's its output:

Notam : 3/4763 FDC 3/4763 ZLC part 1 of 3 mt..airspace Havre, mt..temporary flight restrictions. Pursuant to 49 USC 40103(b)(3), the federal aviation administration (FAA) classifies the airspace defined in this Notam as 'NTL defense airspace'. Pilots who do not adhere to the following Proc may be intercepted, detained and interviewed by law enforcement/ security personnel. Any of the following additional actions may also be taken against a pilot who does not comply with the Rqmnts or any special instructions or Proc announced in this Notam: a) the FAA may take administrative action, including imposing civil penalties and the suspension or revocation of airmen certificates; or b) the united states government may pursue criminal charges, including charges under 49 USC section 46307; c) the united states government may use deadly force against the airborne Acft, if it is determined that the Acft poses an imminent security threat; or d) UAS operators who do not comply with applicable airspace restrictions are warned that pursuant to 10 u.s.c. Section 130i and 2302120020-perm end part 1 of 3 FDC 3/4763 ZLC part 2 of 3 mt..airspace Havre, mt..temporary flight 6 u.s.c. Section 124n, the department of defense (DOD), the department of homeland security (DHS) or the department of justice (DOJ) may take security action that results in the interference, disruption, seizure, damaging, or destruction of unmanned aircraft deemed to pose a credible safety or security threat to protected personnel, facilities, or assets. Pursuant to 14 CFR 99.7, special security instructions, all Acft flt ops are prohibited: WI an area defined as 485411n1101823w to 481105n1101922w to 481145n1091337w to 485516n1091407w to the point of origin. SFC-34,000' MSL effective immediately until further notice. Exceptions: a) national security Acft ops under direction of department of defense; and b) law enforcement, air ambulance, and other urgent governmental response Acft ops with authorization from ATC (ATC must secure PRE-approval by the on duty national tactical security operations air traffic security coordinator). 2302120020-perm end part 2 of 3 FDC 3/4763 ZLC part 3 of 3 mt..airspace Havre, mt..temporary flight all aircraft, which are already airborne within the defined airspace when this TFR becomes effective, must exit the area using the most expeditious route consistent with safety and in coordination with ATC as appropriate. Department of defense tel 850-283-5242 is the CDN facility. 2302120020-perm end part 3 of 3
Maybe. But I think there are plenty of levers on that as well.

Example: 2 years ago we bought a house on Long Island, near NYC. If we were willing to live 30 minutes further east, the same house would cost half. If we were willing to live in a few nice part of Cleveland, the same house would go down by half again. And if we wanted to live right outside of Cleveland, it'd drop by half again.

Point being that things can get VERY affordable if you are willing to be creative and flexible with location. Which is easier now than ever with WFH. I also think boomers will start moving out soon and there'll be plenty inventory. Housing will be fine.
Thanks, looks like this is the relevant code: https://github.com/historicalsource/zork1/blob/master/1actio...

As I understand it, the thief doesn’t travel via room exits, but rather warps through the rooms sequentially in the order they’re listed in the code, skipping any that are sacred or non-land.
You can still have your single-family home, that's fine. This is about giving people the option for apartments, condos, etc - because those are currently banned in the vast majority of the US. It's not taking away the option of a single-family home.

And with respect, as another commenter stated, that's your dream. There's a lot of options in between that just don't exist right now in most of the country.
It being varied doesn't surprise me. What surprises me is that it doesn't vary that much within a sample. That you can parse out specific patterns or characteristics enough to figure out exactly where this sample of sand is from
No one is stopping anyone from building a single-family neighborhood, if it makes economical sense in the area. Neighborhoods are usually developed as a unit.
I think it’s the nature of averages. Why should it be the case? There are a lot of people earning minimum wage, which brings down the average etc.
I guess to clarify, where I've lived the most common type of AC is a window-mounted unit. IIRC those are generally less efficient than the heat pumps getting installed today, to the point where my family got paid by our utility to replace the window units with them.
Sadly, stopping emissions isn't enough anymore.
You can build binaries on Gentoo and update from the binaries you've built rather than compiling as you go!

You can build binaries for all of the packages that need to be updated by running the normal update command and adding "--buildpkgonly".
Not going to happen:

https://www.servethehome.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/NVID...

That unless an utterly revolutionary new interconnect technology comes...

LPDDR is getting adopted more and more too, with CPUs losing memory expansion capabilities in exchange of huge power savings.
It's disappointing that the generally dire state of gender care in the west - in terms of a lack of rigor (as complained about in this article), lack of consistent process, etc - is used mostly as an excuse to shut down clinics entirely or fully ban gender care even for consenting adults (in process in the US right now).

The high rates of mental health struggles and suicides in the general US population (including but not limited to people struggling with gender issues) are used as a tool for arguing that gender care somehow leads to people's deaths instead of as a tool to argue for comprehensive, no-cost mental health care for people of all races, genders and identities.

We're just handed the latest most fashionable bogeyman - drag queens doing book readings at the library, gender-questioning kids going to gender clinics, etc - and told that if only we Put A Stop To this, maybe things will be alright again. When in reality millions and millions of people are experiencing untold suffering right now, and we could make fundamental fixes to our medical system to help all of them instead of fixating specifically on a small subset of the population and helping extremist lawmakers ban entire categories of care, whether it be gender care or abortions or birth control.
Lucretius' “On the Nature of Things” Summarized by Emma Woolerton
The average person sees “Canadian and U.S. aircraft were scrambled” because the news media is quoting his statement in full. If you were really worried about confusion, you wouldn’t be quoting like a creationist to create that confusion.
Bitwarden is working on this too

https://community.bitwarden.com/t/store-webauthn-fido2-crede...
This reminds me of the Trisolaran from the three-body problem. <spoiler> They communicate with each other much more accurately and quickly with each other and have no need for a speech/language per se </spoiler>
In this case, you are deeply wrong.

Anyone looking at NATO and NORAD right now, and thinking - hmmm. Them Americans are weak... are not paying very much attention to the current state of the world.
I agree with this (words mean things), but have also been told to my face in community meetings during attempts to upzone parcels “we don’t want more people here.” These are not fancy burbs, average SFH value is ~$300k. The approach with the uneducated is different than that with an adversary.

Until more state laws (ie California’s recent legislation) are passed where density developers can reply “that’s a shame”, NIMBYs rule. NY is gearing up for a similar fight.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/11/hochul-faces-uprisi...
No but you do need a CD-ROM drive and 256 color capable video card.
This would be golden. Imagine being able to text prompt for breaks, for example: A "Think" break, but with bongos and using the "Apache" pattern and no reverb.
> I’m wrong about this obviously but I still cannot understand why.

I have this theory (I wish I could think of a way to easily prove it right with some kind of cherry-picked statistics/data but I'm not confident I'd be able to) that we've finally reached a point (I'm sure it isn't the first time in history but I don't know a lot of history) in "late-stage capitalism" that the top 20% don't mind paying/can pay/will pay/are willing to pay/compete with each other to the point where the bottom 80% can't keep up.

My source is, I tried to buy a house semi-recently. All of the typical stuff you read. Lots of demand/competition. Middle class stuff. The houses sold for what it sold for because that's what people are willing to pay.

Whether it's because the couple who won the bid had bought a $300k house 10 years ago and it doubled and they had $300k extra in funny money equity fall out of the sky is almost irrelevant because it puts them in that "20%" category. Once you are in that category (in my mind), things like "I should drive a Corollla to be efficient" go out the window when every stop light is people who can comfortably afford $80k BMWs without blinking an eye. "Who would pay that?! You can get a good used car for $20k! Blasphemy"

I see it like this:

If a house is priced for $600k but your gut (bias based on historical data) says "it was just $400k not too long ago, it should be worth $400k! this is madness", but then the market moves on and leaves you in the dust (and that $600k house goes from $600k to $700k and beyond), it's just upper middle class people paying (hopefully) what they can afford/are willing to pay.
It is the combination that did it. Restrictive zoning limited available housing stock. Then financialization optimized the market for extractive high profits.

Make it possible to build more then the market should eventually correct, but the financial squeeze will continue until the market has plenty of supply as often referred to by economists as market clearance such that demand is saturated at all levels.
They did. Its called “remote”. Now they are trying to undo it.
> why do we always seem to grow by increasing density rather than establishing new small towns

We result don't expand by increasing density, this has been generally banned by zoning over the past 60 years.

We mostly expand with sprawl, which causes long commutes, massive pollution, social isolation, bad health, and all sorts of other things. Which for people who want it, great, enjoy! But we ban density, and don't ban sprawl.

As for expanding other towns, this must be done by those with the capital to buy a house, or start a business to offer jobs, etc. Young people starting our do not have these things, and we need to accommodate them somewhere. To everyone who suggests building in a different small town, I suggest that they be the change they wish to see and move out to make room for somebody else.
Mormon Church’s incestment arm under investigation by SEC
For me, it's the fact that new single family developments are unwalkable and a major contributor to childhood depression. Children are meant to be out and about. This can happen in the rural countryside where kids can play in woods and the like. It can happen in the city where kids can hang out around town and see all kinds of people. It cannot happen in a suburb because the cars are too fast, there are too many of them, and there's no safe place for kids to walk by themselves.

And even if they could in most bedroom towns, there's nothing to do.

For me, I'd live in the country or the city never the suburbs.

I had to beg my parents to take me anywhere. My kids just leave the house and find friends or say hi to neighbors. No effort on our part and they get to be free.
Him having a huge ego is the context that serves as the backdrop supporting my statement. You're the one putting it front and center the "story that I'm pushing." If he didn't have a huge ego, I'd read his tweet the same way, but more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Anyways my original post was about the usa being perceived as weak, not about Trudeau, so that really blows a hole in your theory about "my narrative."
Because cities give so many more opportunities. We sortof do what you suggest, but the new small towns are called suburbs, and being close to the city is their draw.
To me it’s replacing one problem with another. Simply changing zoning from single to multi-family doesn’t actually change core root problems in my opinion. A suburb full of single family homes or a suburb of multi-family homes are just different kinds of suburban hells. I think we need to be thinking about designing entire communities more intelligently with things like local markets, shops, parks, rest areas, schools, public transport etc. within walking distance.

Unfortunately people don’t like to admit the downsides of dense multi-family housing either: no parking, increases traffic/congestion, reduction in greenery, looking straight into neighbors windows, etc.

I’d personally like to see smarter zoning with mixed usage in a nice balance where all kinds of types of residences can coexist but I believe it requires proper administration. Otherwise the economic incentive for builders will result in the dominance of multi-family housing.
They have to be transmitted on legacy systems.
Well that's an unfortunate typo in the title.
I really like that they use GPT-J for this - significantly less weights than GPT and open source!
It's not just about the money/jobs though. People have roots. They have family and friends, they have kids in schools, they have communities.
NOTAM uses the 5-bit ITA2 code (International Telegraph Alphabet No. 2) introduced in 1924. Probably too difficult/expensive to change now, considering all the systems it potentially goes through.
This design makes me stick to passwords even though I don’t want to.
In other words… bad design. There’s no way I can recommend this to anyone
I second this sentiment. I grew up in rural and suburban America, and I'm jealous of those who grew up with more people around them.
How is it internal if it's a SAAS?
Governments aren’t cracking down on the greenwashing of bonds - but they should
Japan Says Chinese Navy Ship Entered Its Waters Early Sunday
Anecdotally, when my wife and I were looking at homes it'd be inevitable we'd hear someone else at the open houses talking about their 7th or 8th investment property.

My wife is the chatty sort, so she'd ask them about how they could afford it and they'd always be leveraged up to the eyeballs. The cheap credit hog has been a complete disaster, and when the rates inevitably rise to where they should be we're going to see a lot of idiots with a lot of unbacked debt defaulting on everything.
RPi is too expensive to be an end-point IoT device too. But it is perfect to serve as a hub/base station. And this is where BT could be actually of use, for communication with cheaper end-point devices, for example.
When the cars and the overpass on the left are hopping, it isn't because the camera is vibrating. The last few seconds before the camera cuts out shows the ground moving up and down incredibly far and fast. Again, that could not be some illusion because the camera is vibrating.
> the market must necessarily correct

This kind of market-based intuition doesn't always work in a constrained market like housing, where what kind of housing you're allowed to build, how much of it, or whether you can build housing at all, is all heavily determined by local regulation.
Sounds like a shiny balloon to me.
That's not true.

Most renters want to own because owning is cheaper. Renters live in houses too... It's not like home renters are less likely to want to own.

I know a family who rents a lovely house in a super nice neighborhood... They still want to own.
The need to swap out CDs so frequently (every time you changed worlds) was a bit of a let-down with Riven. It got many things right, but that was a bit of a speedbump.

I kinda liked Myst IV too, but besides the original, it never seemed like another of Cyan's games really hit the same mark.
This is poppycock. Here's a response: https://erininthemorn.substack.com/p/missouri-anti-trans-whi...
> Multiple cash game hustlers have written about this phenomenon.

source please
U.S. airspace is pretty wild those last couple of days. Is this "normal" day-to-day activity that previously just never got any attention, or is something rather odd about the amount of these kinds of things in the past few days?
Affordability is a market dynamic. If you look carefully you will find that newly built housing almost always commands a premium and truly affordable housing is almost always older stock. It is similar to but not exactly the same as used cars compared to new. There are cheaper cars but truly affordable transportation is used. It is also the case that as long as supply is highly restricted the prices will be as much as the wealthy side of the market can bear.
Incest? I think it's a typo, as that is not a Mormon thing.

Well, not a Utah-Mormon thing.

I mean, not a Utah-Mormon-SLC-Official-The-Mormons thing.

I mean, at least not these days. Err...

Anyway, they seem to have been big fans of Gamestop and Tesla in the past. So, kind of a mainstream church in that way I guess you could say.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lds-church-made-near...

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/mormon-churc...

A big issue here is that the church is caught in a preparedness gambit. On the one hand, they feel they need a rainy-day fund. On the other hand, it's possible that due to latter-days ramifications, prophecies, and other frightening things, it may need to be a rainy-day fund the likes of which has never been seen before.

This collision of significant unknowns of course makes it difficult to quantify just why one would stockpile money to the tune of over $100B while effectively refusing to act in accordance with the common expectations of a charitable organization.
The GNU core utils mailing list is probably a better place to ask...

https://savannah.gnu.org/mail/?group=coreutils
There are a lot of things in the aviation world that seem weird to those who work in an environment where everything gets thrown away and rewritten every couple of years.

Aviation infrastructure moves veeeeeerrrrry slowly. Heck, there are still DC-3s in commercial service (not just airshows or the like, but actual commercial service) and that plane is nearly 90 years old.

I wouldn't be at all surprised if there were still small airports who get these notices on a printing teletype or something of that nature.
You can own a duplex or a unit in one
Your first comment was better. This is a discussion about public health so of course people can contribute to it, and take an interest on behalf of the affected. And he does not seem at all upset.
The rationale I have for explaining situations where it doesn't feel like prices are being dictated by the relative levels of supply and demand is that there is latency involved in reaching equilibrium.

The time it takes for prices to reflect reality can take far far longer, in some cases, than anyone is comfortable accepting. There is no fundamental law that says things need to happen at the speed of convenience.

Certainly over the course of human history some sociopolitical or economic arcs took multiple human lifetimes to play themselves out.
because there’s a big gulf between “afford” and “survive”. The point at which most people could afford housing passed by long ago, nowadays housing is something many people are only able to survive the cost of by making big sacrifices elsewhere. Housing is not optional, there’s no room to cut a little cost here or a little cost there, so everything else is sacrificed before it.

Landlords couldn’t care less about affordability, so “the market” is very happy to make money by pushing people into survival mode.

(Affordability in housing is often measured as being up to 30% of income, whereas people can survive by sacrificing everything else — including heat, and food — spending up to 80% of their income on housing. That gap is where the increases and profit of the last decade have been coming from.)
>Can we offer them some understanding and sympathy?

If you make over 200k a year in a booming market, no.
You can have your single family home. I don't want one, and you shouldn't be able to dictate what kind of housing I live in.
We are already meddling with the oceans, by putting more CO2 in them (by way of the atmosphere). The first method described in the article works by directly removing that CO2 from the oceans. It reverse the meddling we've already done.

Then it puts the carbon in calcium carbonate, which can lock it up for millennia.
While I agree that we need mixed use zoning, if you look at where the upzoning is happening, it's typically in places that allow mixed use.

Ending single family zoning is also required to allow corner stores, not just allow apartments.
I bet a lot of people would be happy if their GPU could train large models, even if it took 5x as long.
This is exactly why I build log-store. Can easily handle 60k logs/sec, but I think more importantly is the query interface. Commands to help you extract value from your logs, including custom commands written in Python.

Free through '23 is my motto... Just a solo founder looking for feedback.
You need to authenticate are least once before you can use your biometrics
Price is not an issue when the choice is more expensive housing or more crime. Lower prices bring in more poor people which brings more crime. High prices are a feature, not a bug. This is perhaps the single most obvious and consistent, but most overlooked aspect of American urban development.
Apartments are great for single people and retirees. Families should have a house with a back yard and a drive way. It's our dream.

There are a lot of households without children and not that many apartments—-especially higher end ones in nice places.

Allow some more of those to built so single people, retirees, and so-inclined others can move into them and that will free up houses with yards and white picket fences for families that want them.

My empty nester parents have no apartment options if they want to stay in the same community where they’ve lived for decades.
This is one of those complex topics which on HN, seesm to lead to "it's simple, do X" types of analyses, which tend to be simple, confident, and wrong.

Some facts to consider:

At Harvard, over 40% of non-minority students received special treatment for admissions (which includes factors such as being a legacy, athlete, or the 'dean's list' which was a list of high donating parents). 75% of those would not have been admitted w/o that help. I think this lawsuit is trying to pierce this veil. [1]

For those that argue "meritocracy" and that standardized testing is the answer: the SAT has a correlation of about r=0.3 to 0.5 with first year college GPA. Thus, the explained variance (r*2) is about 9% to 25%, meaning as much as 81% of college success is not statstically predicted by the SAT. [2]

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/nov/17/harvar...

[2] https://satsuite.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/national-sat-val...