skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It may just be culture. Tidal tried to be a music app with exclusives, and got a couple of big names, but people are used to being able to listen to everything on their preferred platform and get annoyed at artists who go for an exclusive. I think games have the same thing to some extent.

I would note that there have been some "artists" showing up on Spotify's recommended playlists who haven't been heard of anywhere else, which are suspected of being their "store brand" (where Spotify have presumably paid some session musicians to record the song but keep all the rights).
As do electric vehicles which requires three current grids worth of wires to power them.
Ludwig Wittgenstein had same idea. but finally he found human experience is more then our language.
Thanks, that's probably useful context.
That's very disputable given the costs to Tuco and in any case, the modal positive sum is that both employee and employer profit.
> If it was a lab leak there will be no accountability anyway.

There hopefully would be accountability from those in the west who did their best to crush any dissenting voices from even questioning the origins.

I take no stance on this and don't consider myself informed enough to have an opinion but I will say that even asking the question two years ago made people treat you like a moon landing denier.

I'd argue that response to crush the line of questioning at all is bad regardless of the true origin of the virus but if it did turn out to be a lab leak of some sort then hopefully it would spur all the academics, media pundits, and average joes who shouted down anyone asking questions to reevaluate their approach to topics like this.
As opposed to EVs that have considerably larger manufacturing carbon footprint compared to ICE cars? Also remind me what is the percentage of clean energy those EVs are consuming?
The pirate movement might have been a bit early for their time, but if AI happen to be the technology advancement needed for society to abolish copyright law then lets get it done.

With everything from scihub getting blocked and people getting subscription fatigue, it is an excellent time for the restrictive laws to be replaced.
Yes. Its actually well paid.

Just go to

becomingapaidshillforputin.ru

sign up, you get one of those furry hats for free.
Not fearmongering, just not suggesting broad policy based on local craigslist or Facebook Marketplace listings. I'm sure you can find an example based on the number of economic transactions that happen every day in a country, I'm suggesting it isn't scalable and that there simply aren’t that many $2k-$5k used cars in reasonable condition. Most of those vehicles get shipped to developing countries when they hit someone like Carmax or another volume dealer (happens in Europe too with these vehicles going to Africa).

It feels like we're off track though from any meaningful discussion considering the TAM for sub $5k vehicles.
I have a friend who went through almost exactly the same driving event as this guy. Hit a man wearing all black on a country road at 1AM. Could have driven away but called 911, rendered first aid, and stayed through the ordeal. He also ended up spending several years in US prison for it.

Really fucked up.
People who have information x, and were in location y (especially where y is not a common place for x holding people) will be a very limited set.
Indigo website still offline nearly 1 week after cybersecurity incident
Why would a face to face conversation help? A smile is going to suddenly explain why you using a 7 character variable is jeopardizing the project? People are so afraid to confront others in person so if you talk to them they will just accept your changes so they don't have to deal with the person breathing on them anymore? I can see that..
Mambo? Super intuitive interface!

https://peel.fm/23ffd9c
Google Fiber’s 5-gig internet service starts rolling out in three cities
> still

It's worse than this implies. If NIH had taken no action, then the Ecohealth contract would have expired. Instead, Fauci made sure that one of his last acts as (the highest paid) public official was to renew that contract.
Don't get me wrong. But if you're smart why you don't have your own company or business? Making a successful business in a capitalism atmosphere is not that hard for smart people.
The thing that makes me wonder is cases like yours.
Smart and and yet they are working for dumb or evil people.
Nobody got their wealth just by themselves.

Just replace "stealing" by paying back what you owe to society for providing you with everything you needed to make money: a safe environment, the rule of law, infrastructure, maybe education and healthcare, public investments into fundamental research etc...

Then if our society decide to give a part of what you paid back to Paul, that's a political question but it is not fundamentally unfair.
The first thing for me is: moderators must not be chosen by the community but by the "admins", as it was in the old forums

Moderators chosen by the community contribute to the echo chamber of the community itself and bend the rule in that direction, making the whole subsection more and more polarized in that sense.

Moderators chosen by the admins should me more impartial, potentially taken from outside the community itself, paid for their jobs so they adhere to the general rulebook, and keep all the sections as neutral as possible, encouraging exchange of conflicting opinions without flame.
I have a friend who listens carefully and starts to mouth and even mumble his brain’s predictions for the next words I am going to say. So, I fuck with him by unexpectedly (even to myself) changing my words (or even the sentence) half way through when I catch him doing it. Predictably, I don’t like being predictable.

The fact that ChatGPT does so well is perhaps a sign we do somewhat generate sentences on the fly. Obviously we mostly listen and read sequentially.

One could test it by using an external random bell to signal you should try and make a significant sentence change e.g. from English to Spanish. How much practice would it take?

From 1984: In the middle of Hate Week, the speaker is halfway through a sentence about hating Eurasia, he is given a note, and he continues the sentence except now Oceania is not, and has never been, at war with Eurasia, and it is Eastasia that is now hated.
> ( i think maybe it got a bit bored at this point as the text just stopped.)

Just type in "continue" and it will continue
> One professor I worked with quipped that a field is called AI only so long as it remains unsolved.

Not just one professor you worked with, this has been a common observation across the field for decades.

But the deeper debate about this is absolutely not about moving goal posts, it is about research revealing that our intuitions were (and thus likely still are) wrong. People thought that very conscious, high-cognition tasks like playing chess likely represented the high water mark of "intelligence". They turned out to be wrong. Ditto for other similar tasks.

There have been people in the AI field as long as I've been reading pop-sci articles and books about who have cautioned about these sorts of beliefs, but they've generally been ignored in favor of "<new approach> will get us to AGI!". It didn't happen for "expert systems", it didn't happen for the first round of neural nets, it didn't happen for the game playing systems, it didn't happen for the schedulers and route creators.

The critical thing that has been absent from all the high-achieving approaches to AI (or some subset of it) thus far is that the systems do not have a generalized capacity for learning (both cognitive learning and proprioceptive learning). We've been able to build systems that are extremely good at a task; we have failed (thus far) at building systems which start out with limited abilities and grow (exponentially, if you want to compare it with humans and other animals) from there. Some left-field AI folks would also say that the lack of embodiment hampers progress towards AGI, because actual human/animal intelligence is almost always situated in a physical context, and that for humans in particular, we manipulate that context ahead of time to alter the cognitive demands we will face.

Also, most people do not accept that Eliza passed the Turing test. The program was a good model of a Rogerian psychotherapist, but could not engage in generalized conversation (without sounding like a relentlessly monofocal Rogerian psychotherapist, to a degree that was obviously non-human). The program did "fool" people into feeling that they were talking to a person, but in a highly constrained context, which violates the premise of the Turing test.

Anyway, as is clear, I don't think that we've moved the goal posts. It's just that some hyperactive boys (and they've nearly all been boys) got over-excited about computer systems capable doing frontal lobe tasks and forgot about the overall goal (which might be OK, if they did not make such outlandish claims).
If this is truly meant as a PoC to raise awareness, shouldn't there be a writeup of how it works and/or source code? I'm not interested in running some random binary that claims to hack a game, but a technical description of the vuln would be interesting.
Normally I'd agree with you, but not on this.

The Democrats had the option of doing nothing. The railroad workers would have had a strike for a variety of their issues (safety being high on the list), and the workers would have gotten a better deal than the one they got.

Unfortunately the strike would have to have lasted long enough and been painful enough for the train companies to accept that they had to negotiate with workers rather than trying to bargain with Congress. That's fundamentally why Congress caved - because THEY would be blamed for the economic disruption. But that doesn't change the fact that simply doing nothing would have been a better outcome for workers.
Seven states push to require ID for watching porn online
SPICE, the integrated circuit simulation software, used to "compile" at run time an optimal chunk of machine code specific to the matrix to be solved. This was only for CDC machines. There was actually a parameter called LVLCOD that the user could use to specify that custom machine code was generated at runtime or not.
The proliferation of frameworks and confusion as to which one I should take the time to learn has pushed me towards dart/flutter as a solution for a cross platform GUI language.

Having said that I have been looking at htmx recently.
Just wait until you learn about human history.
I don't understand your viewpoint. It was Trump's fault. He was president. Biden is currently on the hook, and he's fucked it up just as badly.

The Republicans never had a sane response to Covid; their "questions" were all racist as fuck; their vaccine skepticism is still killing people; they're why we can't mask up and reduce the spread.

The Democrats have decided that the very young, the very old, the weak, and the disabled are collateral damage. Joke's on them: Long COVID doesn't discriminate!

The Republicans on that committee are child sex traffickers and virulent antisemites. Their agenda is to shut down the United States government. They don't care about the origins of COVID.
I understood your comment more as Starship wont happen rather then it will be late.
According to the Jewish Virtual Library, [0] the “5 million non-Jews” figure was invented by Simon Wiesenthal. He intentionally concocted it by subtracting 1 million from the estimated number of Jewish victims.

According to Wikipedia, [1] at least 8.5 million non-Jewish Soviet citizens were massacred by the Nazis (both civilians and POWs), and also at least 1.8 million Poles. The victims among the groups you explicitly mentioned, by contrast, added all together number no more than 1 million. It is controversial, however, whether the term “Holocaust” should be used for all Nazi genocides and atrocities, or restricted to only include the Nazi genocide against the Jewish people.

[0] https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/non-jewish-victims-of-t...

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_victims
Dynamic linking is by far the dominant use of self-modifying code these days, followed shortly by JIT code generation.
>They regressed on tons of metrics that are closely tied to and both predict and are predicted by household stability.

Sure, Black people are also living a lot longer which seems like a good outcome in terms of quality of life. [1]

[1]https://spia.princeton.edu/news/life-expectancy-gap-between-...
The infrastructure is already materializing. >50% of the 119k public charge points in NL were installed within the past 2 years, providing their services to 328k BEVs.

And if you don't ever want to wait for a charge, then you can often use public transit, or ride a bike.
Everything I needed to know about Russell's performance war was answered when, whilst he was working at Google, folk started asking him why he was naming and shaming companies for poor performance when his exact critiques were swiftly applied to Google's apps (calendar, maps, gmail). I wish I could find the twitter thread from back then, but the gist of his response was that what Google was doing was incredibly complicated, far more than anything the targets of his ire were working on, and as such it was reasonable not to have fixed those issues.

He wasn't wrong in his assessment of complexity, but the fact he refused to acknowledge the business priorities were the same between Google and companies he called out, absolutely baffled me. The gist from my perspective was that companies external to his own should bend over backwards for performance, while his should not, because his personal goals were tied to improving the performance of the web. Hopefully that's an over-simplification and I've missed something, but that's what I can recall.
Not at all, I come from France, and we've been robbed by taxation since the country started. There was a time where priests, from the church, came to collect in exchange of telling us all was well, we were at the position God wanted us to be and we should obey the local lord.

Imagine paying taxes for that service and not calling it "stealing".

One can challenge how tax are allocated or extracted.

But it's hard because most people only care once it s so inefficient and unfair nothing works anymore. And I do wonder where the money could come for a universal income ... ourselves at best ? Foreigners at worst ?
That I was kids to stop being out on the sex offered registry for playing doctor isn't being contrarian, it's common sense.

The only people who think that we should keep busting teens by the truckload for sexting are closeted pedophiles.
I have a '46 Dodge WC that can be fixed with an adjustable wrench and a hammer & will run on even the crappiest fuel (5.1:1 compression ratio). I can crank start it, too. It's an old farm truck, and cost less than $2500 (albeit over a decade ago).

Buy 'em while you can.
> because by the time it's obvious there's a problem it's already spread.

That doesn't quite ring true to me - there's a difference between 'obvious to the public' and 'obvious to the experts'.

The problem is that if you respond to the experts, the problems don't eventuate, and the public goes "well what was all the fuss?".

We saw that with SARS. People were actually criticising the (then competent) WHO for their zealous response.

You get praised for fixing problems; you get shat on for preventing them.
Interestingly, the video was posted (and presumably the site went live) within 30min of the NYSE (where Skillz is listed) closing.
See the history of indentured labor.
It’s by emergent construction that language has this property. It’s no accident.

In order to be able to communicate at all across the arbitrary range if subjective human experience, we had to come up with sounds / words / concepts / phrases that would preserve meaning across humans to whatever functional standard necessary.

Thus language is fundamentally constructed to be “modelable” whether it be humans or machines doing the modeling.

There is a whole other realm of ineffabilities that we screen out because they aren’t modelable by language
Come on, give its full title...
Calling the view of approximately half the US population "unserious" is why we are where we are. People who cannot fathom or refuse to accept some widespread opinion/view/belief of another is why we are mired in identity politics and are beholden to bands of 80 year old children yelling at one another between oxygen hits and running the country into the ground.

I think you ought to be more charitable to the opinion expressed by others, it's far more constructive.
Ironically , oil tankers might be one of the most logical uses since they tend to amongst the slowest cargo ships.
Don't they use time of flight?
Fuck me, a quantum tunnelling virus.
is this an uptick in instances or simply heightened media awareness of it? Obviously any derailment is bad, but it would be useful to know where on trend this is, to know exactly how bad
Here's a theory. Thoughts exist on certain time scales. Everything about perception exists on certain time scales. The brain wave frequencies we use to represent things is directly related to the time scale of the thing it represents. The end of the sentence which you are trying to reach departed on its internal journey though the brain around the same time as whatever triggered the thought. It just so happened to take a more circuitous route, delaying it in preference of other words until it was ready. The longer the distance of logical relations between parts of the sentence, the larger the relevant time scale, the lower the relevant brain waves used to represent it.

Its like a juggling act. The ball with the conclusion is thrown up highest, a bunch of other balls are thrown up in between, and they should all start arriving back in your hands, in the correct order, one at a time, without having known the exact sequence to expect when they were first thrown.

Sometime the juggler misjudges and the train of thought is scrambled and lost.
You Are an Impossible Machine – Kurzgesagt
As far as I can tell, all this does is mitm yourself so the proxy server can change the data being sent to the server, which is like, the most basic of possible ways to cheat a game, and only works on games that fully trust the client and have absolutely no server-side validation. Yikes
It's still an open question if you're honest. There's no hard evidence either way -- everything that people have come up with is disputed and reasonably so -- and China won't let people investigate.
Is there a concern of transferring mass between the Earth and Moon (at scale) and its effect on the movement of the planetary bodies over the very long term?

I get that right now, the effect would be infinitesimally small. But some comments are talking about turning the moon into a massive factory, using the lunar materials to fabricate semiconductors, data centers, spacecraft. What happens when those products are exported from the moon, thereby reducing the mass of the moon? After hundreds of years of mining and exporting, could we see a change in tidal activity on the Earth, for example? If the moon's pull on the oceans decreased, could that actually help mitigate sea level rise?
What’s objectionable about that? Can you explain that to me. I’m afraid I really don’t understand.
Most people agree something should be done about climate change. Using it as an excuse for other stuff, for political and business gain, is one of the main reasons climate change is not being taken seriously. Fix the problem directly, don't use it as a boogeyman to tell people how to live or what to buy, and we could be way more successful at avoiding opposition. Unfortunately, the most vocal people see climate change almost solely as a means of getting power rather than something to actually try and overcome. Equating not wanting freedom to use something you buy with giving up on climate change does not help, it makes people more entrenched in their views
On mobile this is exactly how it works for Spotify. There is a filter at the top for podcasts and then it just shows podcasts. Good for finding something when going for a walk. The UI/UX on Apple's podcast app didn't work well enough for me (could be a me problem) to figure things out, sometimes their UI/UX decisions are odd burying things in menus.
Enterprise firewall
High value. Not per Shia or, but John value and rather subject to breakage (so the fewer days it spends at sea presumably the less breakage).
With Wireguard being a point-to-point protocol (as I understand), it will be challenging to get good performance for L3VPN BUM traffic?
The holocaust is even worse when you consider that the 11M deaths was with a world population of 2.3B, where the 6.8M COVID deaths is with a world population of 7.7B

edit: sources.

6.8M COVID deaths reported to WHO https://covid19.who.int

1940 Estimate World Population https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimates_of_historical_world_...
I have never found the "big corporations will do <X> so we should all just prepare to suck it" a very convincing argument.
No. Daniel Elk was a CTO and then freelance developer and Martin Lorentzon was co-founder of a digital marketing company (and the initial money)
If it was intentionally released by X, I think it’d be meaningful to hold X accountable.
Looks like language models will become the gurus of tomorrow. Some people will not trust them, but some will die for them. Their effects in politics and the world order will be scary. Cambridge Analytica.
Credit card systems have offline authentication, where a payment terminal can be configured to accept payments under some threshold for a while and send them in a batch later. It's far from perfect, there's lots of reasons online authentication is preferred; but it allows for business to continue with less friction than requiring cash and someone or something to handle it.

It would make sense to do something similar for a charging network. Worst case, it can't be too hard to track down the owner of a vehicle by its VIN.
You'd have to argue that one with ChatGPT.

Here's one of the many failures Jobs had during demos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znxQOPFg2mo
That's true to some degree, but in general there is far more willingness to find the truth. And in some cases blame also should be assigned; "never assume blame" is just as foolish as "always assign blame". There's often a bit of tension there.
Right, but they weren't running IP and refused to do it. I did set up a /30 so the poor old thing could synchronize its clock via NTP, but that was the only IP it talked.

This one's running (present tense) on a 1 GHz Socket 370 Pentium 3. It's got some weirdness about Pentium 4 and newer CPUs. I think it can be patched up but the client doesn't want to pay for the work because "it's fine like it is." Not worth the headache to virtualize as the first attempt didn't work.
Chicago experiments with buying the re-election of Lori Lightfoot...
> These journalists, Wolfe wrote, used four devices: scene-by-scene construction, realistic dialogue, a third-person point of view (where the reader feels as if he or she is inside a character’s mind), and then, in contrast to traditional newspaper journalism, a descriptive eye, in which a subject’s clothing, manners, eating, and living room are as important for the writer to document as the subject’s words.

This style of nonfiction drives me absolutely bonkers. Often it is more about the author and their experiences than the thing they are puporting to write about, as if the author's subjective experiences are somehow the thing that others will find most interesting. Sometimes they are, if the author is particularly talented and has been somewhere particularly interesting, but usually they aren't. To use the phrase that Tom Wolfe coined, it is "the Me generation" in writing form.

I see this style today in a lot of the "long form" journalism, and usually comes across as the author trying to say in 5,000 words what could probably said in 500.

Just the relevant facts, please.