skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Is your 16:8 restricted to a full meal or did you consume or drink anything outside of the 16:8? After-work drinks? Coffee?
Those aren't decades-old "prognostications". They are things that happened.

Could it be different this time? Maybe! But if you want to say that it will, then you have to make the argument. Or maybe you can get ChatGPT to do it for you?
Tailwind and “utility first” CSS is nice, but IMHO using magic string class names isn’t as nice as typesafe ways of styling like styled-components, Styled System, and Shopify’s Restyle.

Full stack type safety, including styling, is where it’s at IMHO.

Maybe there’s other ways of making CSS typesafe and supporting editor autocomplete, but why bother using CSS if you’re not even really using the cascade or non-trivial selectors?
Context: This is the blog of Nick Cave - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Cave

Update: https://www.theredhandfiles.com/chat-gpt-what-do-you-think/
How is the balloon incursion related or relevant?

> at its core are republicans

The article names Ron Wyden and Hakeem Jeffries as two lawmakers who are interested in reining in the power of the FBI, hardly Republicans those two.
PLA: In the future, balloon platforms may become like submarines; silent killers
Late to reply (sorry) but this is an incorrect assumption. Benchmarks do not generalize to everything, especially loading apps from non volatile memory where users might notice latency the most. This is also usually a bottleneck by the memory related components instead of the core itself. Also, its not hard to just throw more brute clock speed at something, which will absolutely consume more energy overall than a slower but more efficient system.
There's an excellent Huberman Lab episode that covers various studies on time restricted eating for both mice and humans. There's a high focus on cognitive, health, and sleep benefits in humans.

https://hubermanlab.com/effects-of-fasting-and-time-restrict...
Medicine has become monopolized, politicized, and propagandized. There are many treatments for modern ailments that is legally forbidden for doctors to recommend or prescribe, or will cause the doctor lose their license.

Doctors operate under the Standard of Care rules. If the doctor does not follow SoC they open themselves to medical malpractice liability. Problem is that the SoC is imperfect, especially for less common afflictions. Doctors often know their prescriptions will not help their patients or even worsen conditions, but recommending non SoC treatments will potentially cost them the medical license that came to them at high cost and represents their livelihood.

It can be argued that the SoC maximizes EV and minimizes cost across the population, however, even if that were true on day 1 of the implementation it would quickly degrade as bureaucratic lockin blunted the learning and innovation that doctors have historically used to advance knowledge.
Space Invaders 30th anniversary developer interview (2008)
I’m never blown away by Perils Of Cheeseburgers cautionary tales.
Zero-Shot Causal Learning
Good luck playing Hogwarts Legacy on your smartphone.
> The study included 2,998 children in kindergarten through third grade at 47 New York City schools. The schools—which serve a racially diverse group of students, most of whom are from low-income families—were randomized to receive either the simple or complex treatment.

Was this selection because some low-income families need this kind of treatment more than affluent ones? Or represent a diversity of racial backgrounds against which the treatment can be better tested?

Was it a factor that they were cheap subjects? Or maybe unlikely to know any lawyers?

As a kid, our (modest, Catholic) grade school participated in a lengthy toothpaste study. The incentive, AFAIK, was you got free toothpaste for your family (and I seem to recall some free toothbrushes).

As an adult now, aware of some history and societal dynamics, if I ever have kids, and they came home with an experiment subject consent form, one of the questions on my mind would be "Are the children of the wealthy and connected also in this subject cohort?"
Since we're already way off-topic, allow me to share my idea for solving this perennial problem: When commenting, there is a little selector:

[ ] My comment is on-topic and positive to neutral

[ ] My comment is critical

[ ] My comment is off-topic

You've got to select one. When viewing, the comment thread defaults to just showing on-topic, non-negative comments, but you can see the other stuff, too, if you want.

This solves two seemingly contradictory desires: the ability to read comments on things that interest you without having to fend off waves of negativity and wade through pools of offtopic text and the ability to speak freely.
There are also studies showing both keto diets and fasting can alter the microbiome and attributed changes in gene expression to changes in the microbiome.
Super Bowl Ad Slams Tesla’s ‘Full Self-Driving’ Tech
Not feasible to cover CONUS with network of ground based laser for forseeable future.

It is also not feasible to keep using million dollar missiles to shoot down thousand dollar balloons.

I kind of doubt that the planes are cheaper than ground based lasers. Even so, a mobile ground station could avoid giving away the US position and allow them to cover more area. Not sure how feasible that is.
I’m 66 and going to a rave sounds good to me ;)
Did my part buying an i5-13600k. Going from an i7-7700 it was a pretty good jump
As far as I can tell, the evidence for the hole being drilled then epoxied on Earth amounts to nobody wanting to believe the alternative (that it was drilled while in orbit.)

Here is the hole. Personally, I don't see any trace of epoxy in or around this hole: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Hole_in_...

(To be clear, it's the small hole, not the big one next to it. The small hole next to the paint marred by a slipping drill bit.)
You're still fighting a strawman. You're the only participant in this thread that's talking about space. I'm going to discontinue this conversation with this message since (aptly), you seem happy responding to views whether or not they come from an actual interlocutor.

- I disagree that inputs to an LLM as a sequence of encoded tokens constitute a "a sense" or "percepts". If inputs are not related to any external reality, I don't consider those to be perception, any more than any numpy array I feed to any function is a "percept".

- I think you're begging the question by trying to start with a person and strip down their perceptual universe. I think that comes with a bunch of unstated structural assumptions which just aren't true for LLMs. I think space/distance/directionality aren't necessary for knowing some things (but bags, chocolate and popcorn as lsy raised at the root of this tree probably require notions of space). I can imagine a knowing agent whose senses are temperature and chemosensors, and whose action space is related to manipulating chemical reactions, perhaps. But I think action, causality and time are important for knowing almost anything related to agenthood, and these are structurally absent in ChatGPT UUIC. The RLHF loop used for Instruct/ChatGPT is a bandit setup. The "episodes" it's playing over are just single prompt-response opportunities. It is _not_ considering "If I say X, the human is likely to respond Y, an I can then say Z for a high reward". Though we interact with ChatGPT through a sequence of messages, it doesn't even know what it just said; my understanding is the system has to re-feed the preceding conversation as part of the prompt. In part, this is architecturally handy, in that every request can be answered by whichever instance the load-balancer picks. You're likely not talking to the same instance, so it's good that it doesn't have to reason about or model state.

But I actually think both of these are avenues towards agents which might actually have a kind of ToM. If you bundled the transformer model inside a kind of RNN, where it could preserve hidden state across the sequence of a conversation, and if you trained the RLHF on long conversations of the right sort, it would be pushed to develop some model of the person it's talking to, and the causes between its responses and the human responses. It still wouldn't know what a bag is, but it could better know what conversation is.
There are a number of ways to approach it. But even if it's just a different set of elected officials, you'd get inter-agency competition.
Fluoride is effective at remineralizing your enamel. Fluoride isn’t just for cavities.
I don’t think it’s about it being a hit so much as the business dynamics have changed incredibly the last 13 years, when many of these projects took off. Open source as a business is incompatible with the Cloud.
Now maintain an app with 3 front end devs.

With Tailwind there’s no consistency across developers. It’s all highly configurable, but no convention.
7 is fairly old for cats, I thought? Not ancient old, but well past early life.

I fully agree on it having a hefty genetic component. Pure breed?
What's New in SQLAlchemy 2.0
> Without generations work on mathematics before 20 century, Einstein wouldn't have developed GR as well.

"If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants" - Newton

I'm sure Einstein would have no problem with applying such a quote to himself.
I say this as a huge space flight enthusiast: I believe the ISS has only symbolic value and serves a secondary function as a subsidy program for component producers. The same was largely true of the Space Shuttle program.

I also don't necessarily have any problems with that, unless it's siphoning away funds that could have been used to build up an actual orbital infrastructure or serves to further the impression that this is the reasonable maximum the public can expect from a human presence in space.

Since the Apollo program we have a history of hinting at, but then purposefully not following through on, the idea of expanding human civilization into space.
It's an analogy, and like any other it will break down if taken too far, but I was trying to explain the limitations of ChatGPT to a non-technical friend and that is where I ended up.
I just watched a talk
On why simplicity matters by Rich Hickey from Rails conf 2012, and I think this discussion is a good example of easy vs simple. Tailwind feels easy because it’s proximate, flexible, quick etc. but it makes the markup disgusting looking and, although I haven’t used it, I feel like it could easily lead to an inconsistent global design as each component can have their own styles that are isolated from the cascading/inheritance effects.

It doesn’t feel simple to me… there is just something about all these inline styles (that’s exactly what these utility classes become) that really turns me off.
I thought I had a piece of dust on my screen, but as I scrolled the dust scrolled: what do these 0xB7 characters do in the identifiers? Are they just "name mangling" to keep them from being exported or something?

https://github.com/ebitengine/purego/blob/v0.2.0-alpha/sys_d...

I noticed another 0xB7 character in a comment, and sure enough it seems to be part of the identifiers: https://github.com/ebitengine/purego/search?q=runtime%C2%B7c...
That article was fantastic. It should probably be its own post.
Also not that long ago, they tried launching a Proton M which had the angular velocity sensors installed upside down: https://www.russianspaceweb.com/proton_glonass49.html#culpri...

Looks like decades of rampant corruption and political violence are not exactly good for high-tech industry. Who would have thought?
Yeah it’s notoriously cpu bottlenecked and doesn’t do much multithreading
This is not the problem as adding query parameters to bypass that doesn't work.
Science? Must every human endeavour generate profit?
The US has a long history of dubious police killings. That some are now high profile seems like a step forward to me.

Yes, civilian oversight of police in many places is weak. But to me that's an argument for stronger oversight.
> Congress itself is THE delegate to assigning the President of the Executive

Subject to the certification only procedure outlined in the Constitution, as was recently vividly demonstrated. (Originally, under Article II, Section 1, Clause 3; since 1804, under the 12th Amendment)

There's a reason the states transmit their electors' votes to Congress, rather than meeting in DC.

Furthermore, current case law is that states have virtually unlimited rights, subject only to US constitutional protections, to run their elections as they see fit.

> and Congress (and the President it chooses) not only votes on the Supreme Justices of the Judiciary

As above, Congress does not choose the President. Ergo, the President nominating and Congress confirming a Supreme Court justice are two independent branches.

> but Congress also has the power to ordain any court inferior to the Supreme Court.

Which may then be overruled by the Supreme Court. All in all, a surprisingly flexible arrangement that maintains superiority of the explicitly authorized and described Supreme Court.
Intel has had process problems. I don't think those continue to be their primary issues.

It wasn't process problems that kept sapphire rapids from being released till now. 10nm/Intel 7 has been ramped up and fabbing products for over a year.

They are very late on critical products that are clearly not the fault of the foundry side. This is squarely on the design side.

Running good engineering orgs is hard, Intel's problems run deep and on many levels.
Oh yeah, that’s true. I was thinking of RRB trees, hash array mapped tries and things like this.
There have been 5 major incidents at the ISS since 2018 that could have led to loss of the station if it were caught later. One of which was only ameliorated by a module running out of fuel.

The problem here appears to be that the quality standards of roscosmos is in steep decline.

This is why Russia is in the title.

Now if you want to draw the linkage between the Ukraine war and regressions to their space program, the evidence is certainly there, but I think this story stands quite well on its own.
This reminds me of the terminally online person who told me they never need to travel as everything about the place is online already. Or libraries exist so we should stop going to school altogether. You seem ready to die on that same hill.
> But the "known laws" are too convolved with chaotic behavior, which is why making predictions from them is really hard.

This canard always gets thrown out but the application here is flawed in two very big ways. First, "chaotic behavior" does not mean "unpredictable behavior." Modern numerical weather forecasting already deals with this through ensemble modeling techniques and other approaches designed to capture the statistics of the evolution of the weather, not just a single deterministic state. Anyone selling you a deterministic weather forecast from a single model is robbing you.

Second, DL will suffer the same challenges here because many AI-based weather forecasting tools are auto-regressive, where a model output is used to seed the next step of the forecast. So the AI approach doesn't actually escape this hypothetical limitation (in fact it might compound it badly).
Normally I just set z-index to 1. z-index is only relative to the parent so you can still have a z-index of 1 overflowing another z-index of 9000 because the parent of the latter has a lower z-index then its sibling: https://jsfiddle.net/ec5qp7n3/

Usually if I find that if I need to control more then one layer of stacking, I’m doing something that is unnecessarily complex, and the right solution is to go back and find a better design.
I don’t know if you guys are being deliberately obtuse with stuff or what, but the Nordstream pipeline can deliver gas to Germany—that’s it. If circumstances change such that Russia no longer wants to deliver gas to Germany, the pipeline has no value to them. It doesn’t matter that it’s theirs. It’s not like they can use it for something else.
My understanding is that they're talking about solid copper 8 m wide
Call GPT-3 from Terminal
% sgpt "What is the Arch Linux wiki url"

The official Arch Linux wiki url is https://wiki.archlinux.org/
Every system suffers abuse issues. Which is why I think we should look for systems that minimize that.
Just by reading the article title my mind went directly to "CIA"
Sabotage might also be performed by a disgruntled / disturbed worker, not working for either 'side'.
It proposes 100 sites over a 1200 square mile area. Each site would be at least 3 miles away from any other site. Energy generation, except nuclear, either uses a fair bit physical space or causes pollution, and doing energy generation in Yellowstone means other areas of the country don't have to.
> What possible reason would the Russians have to sabotage their own side of their won space craft?

Same reason why they blew up their own pipeline (they didn't but our propaganda must paint them as complete morons).
West stoles Russia money and now Russia is untrustworthy. Right. No. You broke your own "private property is holy right" dogma. Russia is not breaking its obligations. It even pays Ukraine for gas transfer right now, an act which many Russian people find weird and questionable.
Reminds me of an experiment, security researchers tried. They took a photo of a woman, created a Facebook profile, and put that she worked at Department of Defense. She was inundated with friend requests from everywhere, but mostly from other DOD employees.
As I understood it, AGPLv3's contains a clause that allows the users (Purethink in this case) to remove additional conditions added to the license. In this case to remove the Commons clause because it was added to the AGPLv3. So they can use the Software under pure AGPLv3.

| But if the license is referred to as the AGPLv3, then its Further Restrictions |Clause – which allows users of APGLv3 licensed software to remove added
|licensing terms –

If they had called anything else than AGPLv3 (something that i understand is permissable) than they can not remove the extra restrictions because only the users of AGPLv3 can remove those.
What new information?

> You're in the wrong here, it's time to walk away.

Nope. The people who are in the wrong are the coach warriors who want to see collapse but aren't unwilling to go fight for it, making arguments from the safety of their countries.
That seems like the weakest argument against it. If we're talking about the kind of shadowy secret agents who will sabotage a $150 billion project (most of which was paid by their own side) as a manoeuvre in a complicated geopolitical game, surely they're not above sacrificing a few innocent lives for it.
The anti intellectuals are unfortunately partially right. The best scientists are full of doubts. What you mostly get in the loud and certain set are emotionally scarred children who sought out science as a life raft, a way to control their environment by “understanding it”. We don’t understand shit, and the people who need you to think we do are broken.

We mostly understand physical processes. The bits we do understand let’s us build trains, make them run on time, and stuff a supercomputer into your pocket that lets you argue with anyone in the world in real-time. That’s a lot. But it’s not comprehensive. Biology is just too complex to study by isolating a single variable. We are basically into linear algebra at this point to make any headway, are we not? Analyzing multivariate situations to isolate patterns.
What was my tone? "Do not so recklessly wish collapse onto others", is that the tone you object to? I would have thought everyone agreed on this.
It doesn't have to generate profit, but it does need to generate more science/better science than the next best alternative way to spend the money. (It's presumably not optimized solely for science, but also engineering and politics, both domestic and international, but it doesn't seem to be the most efficient way to accomplish what it accomplishes.)
Like most things in the js ecosystem, it likely never will. It'll be a best effort, chasing the standard with usability and accessibility gaps littering even the best libraries. But hey, there's rounded corners that glow, so totally worth it.
History is replete with examples that strongly suggest “despite”. Hell, they are still holding us back.
Pinecone - not open source. We have both OS and managed cloud https://cloud.qdrant.io
Weaviate is awesome product but they have a slightly different approach.
Also, you can check open source benchmarks https://qdrant.tech/benchmarks/
Would be fun to compile that with Emscripten for WebGL and make a live demo.
With a 5800X3D, I'm waiting for DDR6 prices to normalise ;)
Googling "ARM ATX motherboard" has some results, but these are so uncommon, everything's going to be an uphill battle.
But the space shuttle program ended a decade ago?
More journey.
The purpose was to keep the Russian rocket program alive and out of the hands of the Iranians, Koreans and other bad actors. It was also a PR effort where the west could strongly subsidize other countries for international harmony and goodwill.

Given the current state of Russia and Iran, it failed.

But ironically it is now doing good science.

I’m all in favor of letting the Russians go their own way at this point.
I would interpret that part as "original twitter architecture was actually well done and resilient" then anything else. It just means that many of those systems were better done originally then legend had it.

The severe and immediate loss of advertising however was not just a minor messed up part of the takeover. The money making parts of business is something that does matter.
So you had a few factors.

COVID/WFH Panic Purchasing for work and school at home.
COVID Cash also put money into peoples hands to buy stuff, like computers.
Crypto mining and GPU shortage was also a factor. As people were buying systems and parts for speculation. People were buying prebuilt computers to mine or simply get the GPU.
Scalpers made everything worse, messing with parts in the supply chain.

So there is the supply and demand factors, and the extra money for consumers and the speculation for crypto, and it was a perfect storm.
The epoxy was applied on the outside and was later covered by insulation. Here is a picture from the EVA where they cut away the insulation and located it: https://i.insider.com/5c112efc4a8213310205a17b
Maybe it’s not a question of sentience but pleasure.

Why do many smart humans use so much of their time devising ways to have more sex? Because fulfilling the instinctive urge is pleasurable on a different level than intellectual work. Maybe for the AI, pursuit of its core directive is similarly pleasurable in an axiomatic way.
WSJ's claimed balloon launch site in China geolocated
Does restricted time eating mean intermittent fasting?
It's just poorly coded and doesn't take advantage of the CPU power on hand. A lot of games are like that, both indie and AAA.
When you start seeing repeated failures in the same place the micrometeorites theory looks less likely.
The article did a poor job of explaining this, but I think the assumption with utility-first CSS is you’re using some component framework. So instead of having to separate the HTML and CSS, and invent names for every child element of a component, you just use the utility classes in the component, and reuse the component rather than the (component level, not utility) classes.
Typing Cylist
16:8 is utterly unremarkable. A huge percent of people skip breakfast and then have dinner before 8pm. This is a normal, bog standard eating pattern.
Industry Refactoring