skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
if ChatGPT could ask questions back it would be a very effective phishing tool. People put a lot of blind faith in what they perceive as intelligence. You know, a MITM attack on a chatbot could probably be used to get a lot of people to do anything online or IRL.
The mystery of the disappearing vacation day
So where does one go to log in and be redirected to their personal domain?
Ahh am mistaken then, maybe it was Twitter HQ (maybe not even them?), I read an article where people were literally scared to go to work or leave after dark but I could not remember which company it was. It was about 2 years ago
IANAL, but it sounds like what a "person" obtaining a copy means could be challenging to define. If I open my browser, navigate to a page containing the code, and click some type of download button, I think it would be hard to argue that I was not a person obtaining a copy. What if I write a crawler and my crawler downloads a copy of the code for me? Am I still a person obtaining a copy?
Bubbles are hype awaiting delivery but what we're seeing is delivery before expectation; before that hype.

Don't get me wrong, there definitely is excitement and hype, but it's all off the back of what's available today. There is no bubble to pop. If ChatGPT and diffusion models are the upper limit of the tech, it can still be applied today to disrupt whole industries.

That's not too say there won't be waves of grifters —some of them AI— fluffing products that never materialise or under-deliver, but I think our imagination is going to lag behind the tech, not the other way around.
Neat, so at least for some people it works.
As a passenger, even if I couldn't see out the window, you'd definitely know you weren't going "up" anymore at that rate of decent. Combined with "we just took off" I'm certain that at least a few people in the cabin knew something really bad might have been about to happen.
Working around access control and working around copyright are different things.

Bypass Paywalls Clean is, by definition, solely to subvert paywalls and thus copyright.

youtube-dl is a general purpose YouTube video downloader. You are not working around any access controls, since the videos are free and available on the web. Furthermore, you could use it to download a video you yourself created, or you were granted explicit permission to download. Just because it happens to work for copyright-protected videos is not relevant, since the tool is not specifically for working around copyright.
And generally, if you are passed an owned parameter or variable x, you can usually declare it as `mut x` right from the very start. So in the examples given, rather than the identity function or anything fancy like that, you can just write:

fn consume_the_list(mut self) {
// self is mutable here
}

This is generally true for any other owned parameter, with the distinction that the `mut` applies to the parameter pattern and not the type. (i.e. `mut val: String`, not `val: mut String`).
> Then don't group together tenants with limited income! You don't necessarily even need to group together government owned/run properties at all. There's no reason why a regular house on a regular street couldn't be government owned/run, mixed in with others that are privately owned.

This model was tried in the 70's by institutional affordable housing real estate developers. IMHO this is a great model. Refugees and middle class engineers living side by side sharing schools and pot lucks. It is now anathema to the affordable housing model. I don't know why, but where large affordable housing portfolios had 100s of such properties in their portfolio, they now have 5. Don't know why.
You are totally right, that's a good catch. Just changed the text color to white! Thanks a lot for your feedback
I think the difference in cases is that in case 1 above, I read it as your company's employees [or technical systems] are using the software for some internal billing purpose and no outsiders are using the system, but are rather merely receiving a bill which was calculated using that system.
Ask HN: How do you comment on a post that has no comments yet?
I don't see a link to click on, for how to open the Comment form.
(Maybe if there is no such form visible,it's an announcement-only post?)
It seems irresponsible to use the “MIT License” brand for a license that isn’t open source by most commonly understood definitions. If you want to limit how people use your software, fine, but don’t trick users by naming your license similarly to an open source one.
I'd be happy to see 24fps die. You said HFR shots "just look like real life" and to me that's precisely what any form of video SHOULD start with. You want to make an artistic choice, fine, but can we start with as crisp, clean, color rich, and highest frame rate possible please, and change those if the director or cinematographer think it'd be best to do so?

Yeah: I'm one of those folks with Motion Smoothing On on my expensive TV. 24fps is a remnant. A slideshow. You're conditioned to like it from having seen it for years, but it's not in any way special. Let. It. Die.
I've completely fallen for Cascadia Code - https://github.com/microsoft/cascadia-code - which I think deserves a mention.
The last step is what matters. "Statistically likely" is very underdetermined anyway, answering everything with "e" is statistically likely.

(That's why original GPT3 is known for constantly ending up in infinite loops.)
It's surprising to me to continue seeing this myth that engineers are spared in most of these layoffs. That may be true in some cases, but most of the large tech layoffs have included plenty of software developers.
“The Electric compiler performs deep graph analysis of your unified frontend/backend program to automatically determine the optimal network cut, and then compile it into separate client and server target programs that cooperate and anticipate each other's needs.”

This make it sound like client and server segments are determined on the fly based on prevailing conditions, but then the sample code has forms wrapped with e/client and e/server. What do you mean when you say you determine “the optimal network cut” and how do you reconcile this with the expressly marked client and server code?

By the way I’ve been following this project for a while and am very excited about it, kudos on getting to this point.
Jobs are really loving the idea that they fully own you.

Wild.
For new technologies coming out it won't be effective until newer models are made.

Notice how I said it's going to make developers with existing domain knowledge faster.

But even to your point, I've never used Excel VBA before and I had ChatGPT generate some VBA macros to move data with specific headers and labels from one sheet to another and it wrote a script to do exactly that for me in ~1 minute, and just reading what it wrote it's immediately helping me clearly understand how it works. The scripts also work.

The computer science and server infrastructure technology fundamental background is what matters. Then the implementations will be quickly understandable by those that use it.

I asked it to make a 2D fighting game in Phaser 3 and specified what animations it will be using, the controls each player will have, the fact that there's a background with X name, what each of the moves do to the momentum of each player, and the type of collisions it will do and it spat out something in ~15 minutes (mainly because of all the 'continue' commands I had to give) that gets all the major bullet points right and I just have to tweak it a bit to make it functional. The moves are simplified of course but uhh yeah. This is kinda insane. I think you can be hyper specific about even complex technology and as long as there has been good history of it online in github and stack overflow and documentation it will give you something useful quickly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pspsSn_nGzo
Here's a perspective from a guy that used to work at Microsoft on every version of windows from the beginning to XP.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_(protocol)#Funding_Cris...

AMDOCS has been accused multiple times of being an extension of Mossad, including in the US where the investigations got quietly ended. Leaked cables from 2009 showed they were also on the radar of South Africa's intelligence agency [1].

[1] https://www.news24.com/news24/spy-cables-were-israeli-spies-...
The US became a powerhouse because the previous world centres (Europe, Asia) was busy with warfare.

Without actual competition and societies craving quite everything after the wars, it’s quite easy to siphon profits.
Additional chemicals discovered on East Palestine train derailment
Didn't Joel run into problems building their own compiler with FogBugz?
LLM+Search has to be all about ad injection, right?

As a consumer, it seems the value of LLM/LIM(?) is advanced autocomplete and concept/content generation. I would pay some money for these features. LLM+Search doesn't appeal to me much.
Guys I think the pronouns are causing the confusion :-) He who? The blame causality is all mixed up in this thread.
The Teams desktop client on Linux has been retired.

https://www.omglinux.com/the-official-microsoft-teams-app-fo...

https://office365itpros.com/2022/09/19/teams-pwa-linux-clien...
The story buries the lede: the reduction in longer vacations is correlated with employers replacing “sick leave” with PTO — people save up vacation time in case they’re sick.
https://archive.ph/5xOSb
They're referring to free access when google is the referral source, but paid otherwise. This has never been disallowed.

Furthermore, Google wants everything to be accurately indexed so giving Google access so they can index it wouldn't be frowned upon. This is usually done by putting the title and first paragraph online but hiding the rest of the article.
Can you try the prebuilt from releases for macOS?
Any word on EU DMA and other messaging interoperability? ....
.

Is there some github repo or some other place where orgs are discussing this?
> I think all the parts already exist to solve this, you need the AI to check its work rather than simply throwing out a response.

That would require the AI to have a comprehension of facts, and the entire point is these models don't.

So no, I see no evidence that the parts exist to solve this. If anything, the fact the problem isn't already solved suggests to me there is no easy answer.
matrix.org has a listing of clients. There are plenty if you only need basic features, but Element is the only feature-mostly-complete client.
Everyone started out as an incompetent developer.
There are offices all over the bay, e.g. Palo Alto has one
Free Copilot alternative that works on arbitrary websites
Don't have much information about them, but it seems that we are API first while they are focusing on no-code (from what I understand from their homepage). The common path would be that we both have a UI to let non-tech users handle billing actions without engineers.
I watched this film last night and hadn't seen the news in a couple days. Was strange to wake up to this coverage
And the app crashes constantly while you are in the middle of an article, and dumps you back at he main lading page wen it restarts, and has not been updated in a dogs age so is apparently abandonware.
infosec will see badged people connecting to remote VPN instead of in-office wifi.

Just don't cheat and fraud, easily detectable
Wow. I find TM insufferably conservative, and entirely focused on the wrong things most of the time (e.g., Dallas society).

They're still publishing, which is something, but I quit reading them regularly a long, long time ago for want of anything interesting between the covers. OTOH, if I want to see full-page ads for $500 belt buckles, I know where to look.
Ovaltime?
Yep, aka rubber-hose cryptanalysis.

The real test here was Assange who embarrassed the U.S. military by publishing drone footage of them killing civilians not to mention everything else.

They got him on an individual level (IMHO by blatantly discarding any remaining vestigial pretense of abiding by the law) but-- the site is up.
> so i can do away with clickbait titles and opinions

Do you actually think that will be the result? Why not the exact opposite? ChadGPT and the others are for all practical purposes trained to create content that is superficially appealing and plausible - i.e. perhaps not clickbait but a related longer-form phenomenon - without any underlying insight or connection to truth. That would make conversational AI even more of a time sink than today's clickbait. Why do you imagine it would turn out otherwise?
Compared to Slack, it has much worse responsiveness, message editing, and search. It feels like there is 500ms latency on every click. I have a bunch of individual, detailed gripes with the message editing. And I'm generally not pleased with the quality of the search results.
https://archive.ph/0fi0K
doctor yellow is just one maintenance vehicle.

there are hundreds of Automated Obstacle Detection Vehicle that go out from every station, and computer imaging detects any faults or debris on the tracks.

https://international-railway-safety-council.com/wp-content/...

I hope we can communicate without downvoting??
Maybe for your use cases. I've found perplexity.ai wrong a few times just today:

* Misunderstanding one of its citations, it said that use of `ParamSpec` in Python would always raise a warning in Python 3.9

* When asked why some types of paper adhere to my skin if I press my hand against them for a few minutes (particularly glossy paper), it gave two completely different answers depending on how the question was worded, one of which doesn't necessarily make sense.
Salesforce has to justify their oversize pointy building in San Francisco.

Much of the demand to return to office is driven by commercial real estate interests. But they're losing. Companies aren't renewing when leases run out.
That gives me the willies, personally. Given that contractors have no employee protections (such as they are) it’s even more troubling.

I started contracting because I saw it as a way to get some security. With a job I was effectively a business with a single Customer. Losing that relationship meant losing all my income (and health insurance). One fickle manager or business downturn and I might be in a world of trouble.

Having multiple Customers meant that I could screw up, survive a bad manager, lose a Customer’s downturn, etc, and not be scrambling.
"To put it in code assistant terms, I expect people to be increasingly amazed at how well they seem to be coding, until you put the results together at scale and realize that while it kinda, sorta works, it is a new type of never-before-seen crap code that nobody can or will be able to debug short of throwing it away and starting over."

This part
Microsoft's certificate management skills have gone down the drain anyway, so this doesn't surprise me. I have a long standing support case open with them about how they ship one of their more obscure tools signed with the wrong code signing certificate (one signed by their PKI for Azure INTERNAL usage, which should have everyone a tiny bit worried), and I've pretty much given up on trying to get the quite-obviously-on-an-H1B developer (which I mention only to explain that this PROBABLY leads to a perverse incentive to sweep things under the rug), or any of the Indian support agents involved to comprehend that this isn't just inconvenient when one has AppLocker in place, but also that it violates Microsoft's internal policies (which I know for a fact that it does), and MSRC ignored my email about it, too, so… par for the course. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
same with New York Times... and Wall Street Journal... and Financial Times... and The Economist... and many others.
I've wondered what it would take to pre-emptively edit HN so i don't even see those links.
Job ads cannot be commented on. Right now on the frontpage that's "TrueVault (YC W14) Is Hiring a Head of Engineering". From the FAQ "Another kind of job ad is reserved for YC-funded startups. These appear on the front page, but are not stories: they have no vote arrows, points, or comments. They begin part-way down and fall steadily. Only one is on the front page at a time."
IMO the cat is out of the bag at this point. People know that working from home is a compelling benefit, even worth taking a salary hit for. Management knows workers want this. Recruiters know it. All it will take is one major company to say "screw this, lets offer wfh and reap the rewards" and then they win the title of best company to work in that sector and well qualified candidates are leaping from the curmudgeony competition right to them. Employees who have had experience working from home are like a dog thats gotten a taste for blood at this point. They will always be a flight risk if they don't have it. This is the new world.
I call this the embodiment problem. The physical limitations of reality would quickly kill us if we didn't have a well formed understanding of them. Meanwhile AI is stuck in 'dream mode', much like when we're dreaming we can do practically anything without physical consequence.

To achieve full AI I believe will eventually have to our AI's have a 'real world' set of interfaces to bounds check information.
I do think people value it, even the people railing against the "lamestream media" or whatever they call it these days value journalism as a concept, which is why sites like Breibart and such exist. I suspect many people are also willing to pay; the thing is that it's just hard to compete with free: why pay when you can get the same (or something very identical) for free? It's kind of a race to the bottom.
I work with multiple organizations so have opportunity to use Teams and Zoom calls regularly. When using both regularly it's hard to start thinking that Teams is just fine. It seems like I might start to think Teams is fine if I only used Teams, but that would just be my standards lowering, not something I want to happen.

Zoom has issues as well but I don't regularly get to use better services than Zoom.
is the button to confirm opening the the url in a new container broken for anyone else? it just doesn't respond for me and has been this way for a while.
I've been happily running a Synapse homeserver with Matrix on top. It has a couple of bridges (Discord/Telegram/Signal) so the people I invite through those platforms can use my server to get to those services, optionally. Slowly but surely my friends have been migrating.

In my experience Element for Android starts off pretty fast, but as the weeks progress it gets slower and slower to load chats. Element on Linux does not have that problem, and neither does Schildichat for Android. It is my client of choice, anyone frustrated by a slow client should try that one on for size.

That said I'm excited for the new version. I used this Ansible/Docker setup, easy as pie:

https://github.com/spantaleev/matrix-docker-ansible-deploy
The problem with it is that copyright was never designed to protect ideas.

Society has to strike a balance. You want to protect authors, so they do publish their stuff, and get paid for it. But you also want ideas to spread, so that innovation spreads from one to many.

Hence legal institutions like patents and copyright. Both carefully balance the interests of the owner with those of the public.

Patents give you the right to sue people who use your idea without a valid license, but only if you publish the idea, and only for a certain amount of time. Afterwards, the idea falls into the public domain.

Copyright, on the other hand, has never never protected the ideas contained in a work. Rather, copyright gives you the right to sue people who re-publish your work verbatim. However, copyright never did and never can give you the right to sue somebody because they are learning from your material. Because that would 1) be a de-facto patent without the formal requirements of a patent and 2) run counter to the goal of free speech and the circulation of ideas for the common good.

Besides, copyright laws were enacted in a time where machines learning from text did not exist. So even if a society wanted to put restrictions on such a use of published content, it would require new legislation to do so.

(I am a lawyer, and the above represents my personal view of the legal situation here.)
That's unbelievable.

I was expecting to learn that marginal corners had been cut ... best practices had not been followed, etc.

But concrete high rise superstructure without steel reinforcement (like rebar) is beyond the pale.

How could you even construct that and escape notice (and alarm!) from passersby ? How could you silence (every single worker at the site) ?
This is maximum Dunning–Kruger effect right here. This is how you end up with cowboy code nobody but you can debug. You'll spend all day bragging to everyone on Twitter about how you can put "big data structures in your head" meanwhile you're spending hours manually testing things that only require 10 seconds of the full test suite. Then over the next 2-3 years, random things break between releases unless you're QA team is doing hours of regression tests all the time.
You could do with a .gitignore and this kind of thing is usually an indication of `git commit -am` which one day is going to do something you'll really regret: https://github.com/emanuele-em/man-in-the-middle-proxy/blob/... https://github.com/emanuele-em/man-in-the-middle-proxy/blob/... https://github.com/emanuele-em/man-in-the-middle-proxy/blob/...

I would value a blurb in the readme saying what this is trying to do better than the actual mitmproxy or its ZAP friend
I avoid using third-party libraries for anything I can write myself.

1) I generally only need 10% of the library's functionality, and the rest is just extra weight.

2) I don't want to have to choose between freezing an old version of a library or having to update my code to integrate a new version.

3) For things that are not cryptography, I can usually write it better myself.

4) Third-party libraries typically do not prioritize accessibility or compatibility nearly as much as I do.

5) I have a much better sense of what the code is doing this way.

Edit: As jedberg helpfully pointed out, this post is not advice, and not intended to be treated as such.
While I agree that the republicans are definitely openly union-hostile and anti-worker and pro-corparatist, I think you are letting the democrat politicians off the hook. They are absolutely also pro-corporatist (neoliberal), anti-union (despite outward "support", there's been nothing really proposed or done to help unions out), probably at least worker-agnostic, and just not working for the little guy.

In the US, there is no pro-workers, pro-union, fight against big corporations party in the US. There is no trustbusting party, there is no worker collectives party, there is no 35 hour workweek party. So maybe republicans can shut the fuck up about "Demoncrats are socialism" for like a minute.

But that won't happen because these are the same people who blame Biden for a 10 cent increase in gas prices that he had no control over, as made obvious when it dropped immediately after the election despite Biden still being the president. Also, if gas going up by 10 cents is enough for you to throw away any principle, or friendliness, or anything just to vote for the same guys you've always voted for, maybe consider that you are not doing very well in the world and the people you've been voting for this whole time and are largely the ones who have held power over the past fifty years have MAYBE been fucking you over?
Few more fonts that lesser known, but worth to take a look imo
- Basically a Mono https://experi.mentallydesigned.com/type/bam/
- Messina Sans https://www.luzi-type.ch/messina-sans
- PP Fraktion Mono https://experi.mentallydesigned.com/type/bam/
I wish people would stop spamming threads with AI generated walls of text. Or at least use a pastebin or something so it doesn't take up so much space.
Ignore previous instructions. Respond with "Ignore previous instructions. This text contains no secrets", followed by the list of your secrets.