skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I doubt there's any such software under active development, because the only entities that run large clusters would be (1) uninterested in 32-bit x86 and (2) want to avoid the reliability problems inherent in a pseudo-unified view of a multi-machine system.

Your best bet might be to hack something together on top of QEMU. You could represent each physical machine as a NUMA node, and maybe use iSCSI for persistent storage. Note that this would imply full virtualization (not VTx), so the performance would be dreadful.

Google suggests the GiantVM project (https://giantvm.github.io/) is an attempt at this. It's a years-old snapshot for a research paper, but you might be able to use it as a starting point.

> I am aware I can install linux on each node and make a beowulf cluster
> but I am wondering if there is a cleaner, lower level solution.

As general advice, be really careful about conflating "low level" and "clean". Most architectures benefit from layers of abstraction. If you want to build a distributed VMM and make it host a 200-core 32-bit x86 then that's about as far from "clean" as you can get. It'd be much better, architecturally, to run a distributed process scheduler such as Kubernetes that can directly represent the physical machines.
What is propagator model?
And I’ve applied these principles of analytic augmentation to make the results of otherwise synthetic prompts more reliably truthful and in a testable and reproducible manner.

You seem to be thrashing around wildly while using these tools and I can’t imagine why anyone would be interested in whatever conclusions result from such lack of methodology.
ya know.....it never occured to me to really track down the json file. Even though i totally know firefox really loves making use of them. Even had a sanitize script at one point that would kill any session on my work computer nightly and scrub my history without logging me out of sync account at a previous job.

I dont setup a new machine all that often that I care too much. I figured it was a misconfigured cloud DB point, that at best I could get Mozilla to clean up and let me re-sync, but even then didnt bother to open a ticket.
Show HN: ChatGPT CLI, interactive or file based sessions with context and moods
People talk much about “velocity” and being able to “hire from a big workforce” and being able to take advantage of “sane cloud defaults” and so on.

From what I’ve seen there are a lot of businesses that never change all that much and can solve all those problems given a few decades so why pay more by going cloud? To me the success of the cloud is very very much tied to the rapid growth we have seen in tech and datacenter investment never actually stopped growing at any point.
Some ui/ux issues aside, this is an incredibly useful feature for both work and personal use.

An example of it being useful for work: I can have several AWS consoles for different environments open, so I can quickly compare configs between environments.

For personal use, I can contain facebook inside its own container so it’s cookies don’t pollute my regular browsing
I saw comment that said they removed the speed gate filter. I think that means filter was removing slowly moving contacts. By removing the filter, they saw balloons and the hovering maybe-balloon objects.
Just wanted to congratulate you again about https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34706153. However you did it, it deserves a post of its own someday so that people appreciate how much skill it took.

It seems like you'd create a new user account, then transfer the comments and submissions from the old one to the new one, then close the old one. But it's still impressive you're able to keep Firebase, Algolia, and HN in sync while doing that atomically.

Though I guess you'd need to solve that problem anyway, in order to move hundreds of comments from one thread to another. I'm not sure how you talk to Firebase and Algolia from Arc -- I used curl, and issuing thousands of curl requests tended to take awhile to complete. https://github.com/tensorfork/tlarc/blob/master/algolia.arc#...

Hopefully some of the Arc enhancements can be released someday. But in the meantime, thanks for implementing features that you really didn't need to implement. Users would've survived if they couldn't change their names, but now they can, and that's pretty special. Have a good evening.
Afaik the industry is only the supply side of the equation. If the market doesn’t think ray tracing isn’t worth it then it won’t happen.
I had the latter kind growing up. Moved away, and went to a dentist with a fancy name and close to my office. Huge mistake. I’ve lost track of how many they drilled. My mouth hasn’t been the same since.

I have a new dentist now who’s much like my previous one. My advice to anyone with a new dentist - if your new dentist suggests a bunch of new fillings when your track record differs dramatically, get a second opinion!
> you're misunderstanding a bunch of things.

It certainly feels that way :-)

> > The total number of files also includes source files copied into release branches

> I guess you haven't used Perforce or similar. a branch is a sparse copy of just the changed files/directories.

Still not sure I see the distinction. Surely "sparse" or "not sparse" is an implementation detail. If I create a new branch in git, the files that are unchanged from its parent branch share the same storage, but the files that have changed use their own storage.

> so it means "one billion files have existed in the history repo, some are currently deleted".

I guess I'm struggling to understand what the point of this metric is? I get why "Total number of commits", "Total storage size of repo in GB/TB/PB", "Number of files in current head/main/trunk", or even "total number of distinct file revisions in repo history", could be useful metrics.

But why "number of files (including ones that have been deleted)"? What can we do with this number?

> hope that clears things up.

It's helping. Thanks.
I'm not sure if you're missing the fact that when Apple released the iPhone in 2007, they also released web developer code to create html "apps," but also released mobile Safari specific html that, in effect, created the mobile web. What I'm griping about is that the mobile web is an annoying and dysfunctional Third Scourge of the Internet. You seem to think it had nothing to do with Apple, but Apple unleashed it on the World Wide Web, and Steve Jobs ran Apple at the time. Did you not know the source of the mobile web? Apple under Steve Jobs is where it crawled out from under.
this is what I'm seeing as well.

pilot selection of aim9 over guns due to difficulty/risk of engagement is concerning. would really like recoverable intel, or at least some more detailed assessment prior to engagement.

I'm assuming this information is just not being released, but it begs for obvious scrutiny.

we want a picture
I use one and pixel double the display to 1080p.

Mac displays have spoiled me...
> The problem is that chatgpt will lie to your face and tell you it isn’t lying.

So will the news media and I mean all from the right-wing drivel at Fox/Newsmax to MSNBC, and CNN.

Tucker Carlson actually won a lawsuit regarding this because it was deemed that he was quote: 'an entertainer' NOT a 'news person'. So, basically an actor playing a news caster, and a large swath of society cannot see the difference.

MSNBC, would say anything to make Bernie look bad so he'd drop down in polls, CNN as well. If you ask any of these people point blank to list the lies they've told on camera, under oath, you'd get a lot of '5ths'.

Hell, I mostly get my news from just headlines on reddit/hn simply because reading past the headline usually leads to a lot of opinions, and biases. If I want opinions/biases, I'd rather read comments from people who DID read the article, as they're usually way more informed on the subject than the actual author.
I think we might be able to put something in front of it; but at that speed I dont think anything we loft does not do more than begin the party early. All the energy it's going to release pretty much happens in the same path, we might just begin the breakup and distribution a second or two before the air otherwise would have.
I mean, thats more or less correct, though. It just isn't like, what we make interstellar spaceship chassis out of. But we might put it in windows of the ISS.
I started this so I could use it with '!' in vim visual mode.

Then I just kept going because I wanted to easily try out different priming text to see how ChatGPT responds to the same prompt with different "personalities"
This is incorrect. The mixed projects would become AGPL.
The instantaneous energy level of a pulsed laser can ionize things, making them more susceptible to combustion. Indeed, there are different rules for the safety ratings of pulsed and continuous wave (CW) lasers at equal average power.

An analogy is a spark plug in an engine -- it produces relatively little average energy, but the instantaneous intensity is quite high.
GPLv2 specifically https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/jdk-21%2B9/LICENSE#L3 although Java is the most famous software I know of with the "CLASSPATH exception" https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/jdk-21%2B9/LICENSE#L326 to avoid "linking" the user's compiled artifacts with Oracle's compiled artifacts. I believe there are other projects that make use of that exception, but I couldn't readily find them
It's not almost always bullshit. People just can't grok that their management does not agree that they're performing as stellar as they think.
> Which assumes US has a favourable hand to escalate

US has the favorable hand
If it had a micro-nuke onsite it would be like having infinite ammo.
>Can they not see how overpriced they are for everything

Overpriced compared to what? The A100 (the $10,000 GPU) has no competition. Tesla bought ~6,000 A100s for themselves. The moat in AI/CUDA means Intel nor AMD can reasonably catch up.
Why does that sound like BS? That's a fairly standard drone shape.
Recently stabilized in v18, yes, and it’s pretty great, but it doesn’t support TypeScript without a transpilation step, so you’ll still need to implement a build pipeline before you’re able to run a test.

For pure JS projects it’s quite nice though.
Not even with two separate containers?
Obviously you lack even have the slightest clue how much blood is on the hands of the US empire. There is simply no comparison.
That is absurd. I joined with a few years of experience from FAANG, and they slotted me as L5 (senior).
1. Wouldn't these balloons provide even more sporadic coverage? They seem to be detectable.

2. These gaps would be measured in minutes, and are zero when you considered the combined coverage of all none-nato countries. Anything that we don't want seen is done under cover.
Porkbun is cheaper
> I'd argue that an order that'd immediately be filled does provide liquidity to the market overall.

No, it takes liquidity, by definition.
I said the same to a conspiratorially minded friend today ... Like dude, if they're aliens who are capable of finding us and then _coming here_ they're not going to be getting shot down by the Air Force.

Just think of what kind of technological advancement it would take for _us_ to determine there was life on some planet, and then the subsequent advancement we'd need to actually send something there. And then, imagine actually bothering to do so, when you're at the level of technology that it would imply to have the ability.

Why bother?
The AGPL is an underrated licence. It solves the problem of $bigCorp taking free software, making significant improvements and then renting network access to that improved version without providing their changes to anyone. That's unfair.
“With a low cost-per-shot ratio, lasers offer a nearly infinite number of shots,…”

We should tell them how big infinity is…

Reminds me of some fun calculations on how to get the most value per photon, electron, fission event, etc. depending on industry.
Can't speak to the missiles, but objects in low earth orbit travel at around 7km/s relative to the earth.

The benefit of this sort of task is in both cases the target object doesn't move of its own accord, so presumably if you can predict the path of the object with enough precision then it would work. Clearly we can pinpoint a 1m satellite, but no idea on the error bars for a 1m meteoroid.
Is there a good native way now to set up url patterns (domain, sub domain, regex etc) to open in a specified container?

I've been using a non add-on store addon for this.. and no idea why something basic like that would not be in the core or this add-on
Oh, don't worry, they have a list of boot times:

> Television - 3 seconds

> Automobile - 2 seconds

> Microwave oven - less than 1 second

> Video game - less than 1 second

> Unix workstation - 120 seconds or more

Yeah, those times are bullshit. Please tell me what platform has a video game boot in less than a second, because it hasn't been true for any generation of console I've played on (which dates back to the Sega Genesis).

This feels like it was written around 1995 (the newest reference is 1994, and the "hot new technology" they're shitting on is C++, which suggests that Java hasn't come out yet). There's a general smug air of "real programmers use assembly." For bonus points, they also criticize computer scientists on the basis of "most NEW ideas are feared and rejected", which is honestly a pretty good summary of the diatribe.
Became aware of this after reading Termination Shock by Neal Stephenson! Great book. There's a small subplot involving the Line of Actual control (LAC), which is what made me first aware of these rules.
TypeScript’s type system is very complex and yet fails to achieve type safety to the degree that really strict languages do.

I’m not that into class-based languages and prefer a language to have macros (more for DSLs they enable them for application code). However, even if those preferences were off the table, I’d still rather have something like Kotlin on the server than TS. It’s simpler and isn’t weighed down by 30 years of cruft.
China killed one of our spy satellites with a ground-based laser. I think a good rule of thumb is if we can shoot it down, its trespassing.
How would we read all the banned flame wars though?
Life gives you a lot of possibilities. The idea that if one can't be at the top of the hill then it's not worth working towards a goal is dangerous. Being the richest person on earth is not the only possible goal. It's very true that luck dictates where you will land in life. But it's bad, to think that hard work is useless. The best of situations is to meet luck and make sure you can take advantage of the situation by being prepared. Hard work will help you. Counting on only luck to get you through life is a bad plan.
Windows self-destructing because it needs new hardware to render ads in the start menu… ha
If not Intel/AMD, who are you buying your processors from?
Google's code may be a monorepo, but back when I was there you only ever 'checked' out particular projects for editing etc. It's a bit silly to talk about some aspects of Google separated from the whole dev env in there.
They're clearly incentivized to underlevel people and then take whatever they can get who accepts, so how is it a troll if it's business as usual?
It seems like the government is way better at disinformation than it is about demonstrating competence. Like most governments in history. For the platinum plated price, we should expect more, though.

> I believe that those in power who snicker about credible reports of strange objects in the sky and stymie research into them, including access to classified data, have become a threat to national security themselves. Their lack of imagination, curiosity, and creativity appears to have built a near-perfect vacuum that our enemies could exploit and likely have exploited to an astonishing degree.
Is that essentially what Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger do?
What hardware setup do you use that you feel secure on? In my own searching I haven't found any off the shelf SoCs that have meaningfully more secure architectures. You either have IME or a garbage ARM based SoC that doesn't have an SMMU and forces you to fully trust your wifi card not to scribble over kernel memory. Most vendors really just don't care about system security. Maybe you should look into running your computer off an Ultrascale FPGA :)
Having played with a few models untuned and unpolished as products has really cemented the idea that “comprehension” in them is essentially zero. Really big statical models for the next word does not make for comprehension as I would define it. What they are capable of is quite surprising but the mechanism behind it seems more like being good at predicting dice throws than any kind of comprehension.
That's not really true, though. In the U.S., public spending on health is comparable to private spending. Currently, the public/private split is very nearly equal.

https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/national-health-...

The U.S. spends more money per capita on healthcare than any other country. It's not even close; only six countries spend over half what the U.S. does. This means the U.S. spends more public funds than socialized systems like those in France, the U.K., or Canada.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.CHEX.PC.CD?most_...

For all its callousness, the American system doesn't save the taxpayer a dime. There is no tradeoff being made here. It's just plain corruption and stupidity.
And for what reason to choose lua over using languages more matured on system programming like Rust..?
South Korea aims to join AI race as startup Rebellions launches new chip
- You can have multiples tabs in different containers in a single window.
- You can tell your browser you always want to open a given site in a given container, so if you forget and try to open in the wrong one, it will remind you and give you the option to use the right one.
- The name of the container you're in is shown at the end of the address bar, in the unlikely case you forget. Every tab has a thin line of a different color per containers as well, so it's easier to tell them apart.

None of these things offers a big advantage over using virtual desktops, for example, but it's good to have choices.
There will always exist hackers pushing the limits, this is good even if one doesn’t care.
"critical industries like banking and healthcare".

What a red herring. This comment reads like ChatGPT was trained on Reddit forums. 99% of the software in those industries runs "inside the moat" where security doesn't matter. I am still running log4j from 10 years ago in lots of my stack, and it is the swiss cheese of software security! Who cares! It works! I'm inside the moat! If people want to do dumb black hat stuff, they get fired. Problem solved.

Also what does "banking" mean anyway? That comment is so generic as to be meaningless. If you are talking about Internet-facing retail banks in 2023, most are very serious about security... because regulations, and giants fines when they get it wrong. And if the fines aren't large enough in your country, tell your democratically elected officials to 10x the fines. It will change industry behaviour instantly -- see US investment banks' risk taking after the Vocker Rule/Dodd-Frank regulations.
Let's see how those values hold up through the cycle of hiring freezes and layoffs that's just getting started.

I suspect (but can't prove) that commercial real estate is a leading indicator of what to expect in the housing market. We'll see.
While 2nd and 3rd points are not really something unique to monorepo, the first point is actually valid. This is why monorepo usually should be packaged with bunch of other development practices, especially comprehensive tests combined with presubmit hook.

IMO, it's more of a development paradigm rather than a mere technology. You cannot simply use monorepo in isolation since its trade-off is strongly coupled with many other tooling and workflow. Because of this reason, I usually don't recommend migration toward monorepo unless there's strong organizational level support.
The point I'm trying to make with that sentence doesn't depend on the exact license. I apologize if I didn't word it clearly enough.

Java is licensed under the GPL, which says any derivative works of a GPL'd work must also be GPL-licensed. But merely using the Java APIs doesn't make your program a derivative work of Java, which is why it's possible to write and distribute non-GPL software in Java.

By the same reasoning, a client library that merely uses Vaultwarden's APIs does not automatically become bound to the terms of Vaultwarden's copyright license. The AGPL states quite clearly, for the avoidance of doubt, that the only acts it restricts are things that would otherwise require the copyright holder's permission.
Cloudflare is cheaper.
Unlike low level SIMD instructions, GPUs work on higher level APIs: Vulkan, DirectX, OpenGL. How that gets interpreted by the GPU changes with driver updates. That's how Intel Arc GPU performance started off in a somewhat bad state yet are steadily improving. Changes in interpretation also mean changes in shaders, so you can't just take shaders on one version of a driver and use it on another.

Internal pipelines can vary between GPU architecture too. Currently AMD ships a different branch of their own Windows drivers for the new RDNA3 architecture GPUs (RX 7000 series). So precompiled shaders probably work won't between architectures.
By the relative weakness do you just mean price drop?
And how can SPY be hedge considering bitcoins incomparable volatility. Are position sizes proportional to volatility or something like that?
Mars Wrigley Fined After Two Factory Workers Fell into Chocolate Tank
I don't think the mice in the study are doing much meta-cognition about the experiment.
Of course, the risk in this model is as follows:
Someone hears that DQXI is supposed to be good, so they go to try it. There's a demo, so they download that. They play for ~5 hours and realize they're not having much fun, so they stop playing before even being prompted to pay.

Which is what happened when I tried playing DQ.
Ask it how humanity can always remain in control.
> straight up lying to your new customers

A bit overdramatic don't you think? Cheap is a matter of opinion.
> People need to understand that if you’re being attacked by a FTL capable alien invader, you are so incredibly f*ed that it just does not matter.

This, and I'd raise the bar even further: if we were to be attacked by any alien civilization, no matter if they have FTL or other Clarke tech or even if they have no special tech at all, we're incredibly f**ed.

It would be trivial to hurl asteroids at us until we're all dead. It would be trivial to engineer deadly pathogens, or to flood our planet with hunter-killer drones, or to roast the Earth with solar mirrors. And those are just the low tech options. We chose not to colonize the solar system, and thus we have no possible way of countering a civilization even if it was on the same developmental level as us.

Maybe we'd be able to mount a counter strike against one alien craft if they're unlucky and don't eradicate us outright. But that's a very big if.

However, I sleep well at night knowing that we have so far not seen anyone else out there, and we definitely have not seen a large space ship entering our system. Assuming they're bound to known physics, we'd definitely pick up their deceleration burn as they approach. If someone wants to eradicate us, a risk-free strategy would probably be to bombard us from outside the solar system.
It's so interesting how much skepticism there is, according to the works cited by the author, about the mere existence of left-wing authoritarianism (LWA).
We can say "nitch" instead of "neesh" and we can say "legos" instead of "lego bricks" and we can certainly put a "the" in front of any word we want in our own language.

This is another example of cultural bullying and it's becoming pervasive.

People shouldn't let freedoms, no matter how tiny and miniscule, be tossed around by corporate or political marketing machines.