skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What I would like, is rather a well-written[1] license that forbids the distribution or sale of machine learning models created from my source code.

I would be perfectly fine with higher-degree statistical models created from my source code, for personal use only when editing the source code. That would only be a good tool.
That is something that this MIT NO AI license also disallows.

[1] Written by someone more knowledgeable in legalese than I am, so that it becomes water-tight. BTW, personally, I prefer copyleft.
While I understand this is rare (and becoming rarer), part of my employment agreement includes incentives for staying with the company long-term. These incentives include a pension, increasing amounts of vacation time, training, and other smaller perks. These longer-term incentives demonstrate the company's commitment to a long-term employment agreement.

In exchange, I have more reason to stay and provide continuity, preserve domain knowledge, etc.

It's ok to have a cold or literal view of an employment agreement. In my opinion that's valid, and looking at your agreement through that lens gives you a lot of information about the intended term or duration of the agreement. Sadly, it's increasingly common for that duration to be "until the next re-org or downturn".
Bing AI "solves" this by shoving search results into the prompt.
I have since forever. If you want my real name from my computer, you need to comb it until you find .pdfs of old bills or forms, maybe an old graphic of a business card design. It's not going to be in an API call (coming from inside the house) to your servers.
Use SQL for data pipelines, Airflow Sucks for MLOps, Draw plots on the terminal
And Data-Centric AI!
> My company forces us to use Google Chat. I would take Teams any day.

For video or text chat or both? Meet + Slack is my preferred solution. IMO Google Meet is the easiest to use video meeting software. Click link and the person is dropped in the meeting. Slack is the best text chat.

Zoom is fine.

Teams is a dumpster fire on my mac. I have a couple external meetings that are Teams and I have to remember start trying to get on 5-10 minutes early. Otherwise I won't have time to force quit the client or restart my browser to make Teams work.
(not a mod just been on this website forever)

At this exact moment, there's 49 points, but 45 comments. If comments >= points, you get a significant ranking penalty (the "flamebait detector", iirc). I can't say for sure that that's happened, but given how close the two numbers are, I bet at some point that was true.
ChatGPT over your personal Telegram Chat
Understand who you are and your relationships by creating a ChatGPT like experience over your own Telegram chat with LangChain.

Be able to ask: When have you been the happiest? What triggers you instantly? How could you have been more compassionate? When do you say yes and when do you say no? At what time are you the funniest?
Acting your rage.
A Look at What's Coming to Laravel 10
> So you tried it once, as a guest and then banned the entire things with out understand the permissions systems or any other possible causes?

That's not what I wrote. I wrote that because someone insisted we said, ok, fine let's invest a bunch of time and solve this and we could not.

Before then we had tried multiple times and even now every now and then we get a teams invitation but I just point blank refuse them. Enough time wasted.

Check TFA: this is a Microsoft subsidiary that needs to be forced to use the solution provided by the mothership. That push really wouldn't be necessary if the people at GitHub believed that Teams served their needs well.
I myself am not a Salesforce employee but was just curious enough to look up the distance between my home address (Sunnyvale) and the Salesforce tower in downtown SF - just a lil bit out of the requirements (43 miles), it’s about an hr and half driving in rush hours…
And you probably save a negligible amount overall for your trouble.
Ehhh I found this article to be quite inauthentic about the performance of Bing AI compared to how I have used it. The article didn't even share its prompts, except for the last one about Avatar and today's date (which I couldn't replicate myself, I kept getting correct information). I'm not trying to prove that Bing AI is always correct, but compare it to traditional search, Siri, or Alexa and it's like comparing a home run hitter that sometimes hits foul balls to a 3 year old that barely knows how to pick up the baseball bat.
Very low carb keto is known to stop you up, if that is what you are referring too. I didn't get any issues, but I kept my carbs a little higher than my wife who regularly did have issues. A small glass of salty water fixes it. Don't venture too far from a bathroom after ingesting.
They probably want to sell you the highest possible package.
I don't agree.

I consider myself something akin to a veteran. I've been coding for over two decades. Not sure if that qualifies, but anyway.

My point is: it's been with experience that I've come to value ergonomics the most.

And that for me includes having a thriving and focused ecosystem, extensive industry penetration, good and stable tooling, lots of well known codebases learn from, etc.

It was when I was young and inexperienced that I didn't see those as the important bits. I was happy hacking on any half assed editor exploring undocumented APIs and trying to discover patterns and idioms by myself. I was happy to waste time.

I'm not anymore. That's why, while a love Clojure as a language, I don't really use it that much nowadays.

Too much friction.
That sounds amazing - how did you make that happen?
If tyrannical localities want to enforce their norms, let them block it themselves.
And this doesn’t seem like it’s a hard problem to solve

1. Recognize that the user is asking about sports scores. This is something that your average dumb assistant can do.

2. Create an “intent” with a well formatted defined structure. If ChatGPT can take my requirements and spit out working Python code, how hard could this be?

3. Delegate the information to another module that can call an existing API just like Siri , Alexa, or Google Assistant

Btw, when I asked Siri, “who won the Super Bowl in 2024”, it replied that “there are no Super Bowls in 2024” and quoted the score from last night and said who won “in 2023”.
Apple fixes new WebKit zero-day exploited to hack iPhones, Macs
> It seems like a LOT of people think it's a replacement for Google/search engines

Well, that "lot" includes the highest levels of management from Microsoft and Google, so maybe the CAPS are justified. And the errors we're talking about here are errors produced by said management during demos of their own respective product. You would think they know how to use it "correctly".
> WHEREAS, the purpose of K-12 education is to educate children in the facts of our world to better prepare them for their future and further education in their chosen field of study, and to that end children must know the difference between scientific fact and scientific theory; and
> WHEREAS, a scientific fact is observable and repeatable, and if it does not meet these criteria, it is a theory that is defined as speculation and is for higher education to explore, debate, and test to ultimately reach a scientific conclusion of fact or fiction

So they're trying to ban things from being taught in schools that aren't repeatable or are too controversial. In spirit this seems like a good idea, although I have to wonder who defines controversial and how this will play out. It also hasn't really gone anywhere and nothing has happened with it
Sometimes you do this to force attrition so you dont have to do more layoffs.
Have you used the Google workspace tools? They also have tight integration of docs/meetings/chat/etc.
> the fact that they just chose to close the discussion instead of trying to move forward on the proposal doesn't bode well

The way I read that wasn't as a "buzz off, we don't want to discuss this", but rather as a "okay, we've heard all that was said, we will think about it". At some point everything that can be said has been said.

Did they need to close the discussion? Probably not, but it avoids the work and overhead of having to moderate things because it attracted quite a few comments that did need moderation (and will likely continue to attract them).
I'm not more knowledgeable in legalese than you.
I suppose I'm indifferent to whether it's hard or not; it doesn't matter to me as a consumer. If your LLM can't provide the sources for the facts it's asserting, then maybe we shouldn't trust it in matters that depend on facts? If your LLM can't tell the difference between factual statements, postulation, and argument, then why would I trust for anything at all?

It's a great party trick though.

FWIW, I prompted ChatGPT with "Describe how tail recursion works in programming, and why it is important. Include citations." and it actually included two relevant links in its sources, but did not indicates which part of the text depended on them.
I'm reminded of Isaac Asimov, who has built a whole range of stories on the 3 principles of robotics, with many situations arising where reality didn't match how the creators thought the robot should behave in a given situation.

It looks we are making a huge progress in that direction, with very similar problems arising.
Agreed. It appears then they were averaging up, and now they are averaging down.
Element X is an entirely new client written in Rust + Swift UI/Jetpack Compose (https://github.com/vector-im/element-x-ios and https://github.com/vector-im/element-x-android) which will eventually replace the legacy Element apps (https://github.com/vector-im/element-ios and https://github.com/vector-im/element-android).

The features already exist serverside; we're just working on getting them out of beta.
Mostly irrelevant. What's at issue here is trading on MIT's name.
There's currently a trademark fight happening around AGPLv3+CC, because "AGPL" is a trademark not owned by the people trying to combine the AGPL with the Commons Clause. Might be worth looking into that.
An AI agent flew a USAF training aircraft for over 17 hours
Cloudflare mitigates record-breaking 71M request-per-second DDoS attack
No not really. I know people who were at multiples of FAANG who struggle to find jobs for months now (SWEs & SREs). Certainly noone's going to snub an offer for lack of remote.
I switched to Iosevka for both iTerm and Emacs several years ago and have been pretty happy with the added horizontal density. My only real complaint is that Emacs behaves a bit weirdly when lines exceed the buffer width, but I haven't tried switching back to a "normal" typeface to confirm that it's Iosevka's fault.
'Luckily, no accidents have happened yet, so we still have nothing to worry about'

-The US Govt
Can HN German speakers please confirm/rebut that “hallucination” accurately reflects what was said?
Also, because people tend to be nitpicky about particular font features, such as:

- g with a curve or loop at the bottom?

- 0s barred, dotted or gasp nothing?

- $ with full-length bar or just top/bottom pins?

- etc

There are some fonts families out there that let you select just the right set for you, for example Input: https://input.djr.com/info/
JetBrains Mono is my choice. I tried switching between a bunch of them and always came back to it. They've done a great job.
It's an open source license, but not an Open Source one.
You forgot the worst one! When you copy a message in Teams, it "helpfully" adds a header so you end up pasting "[Tuesday 12:54] John Doe" into random form fields / your terminal / your browser location bar ten times a day
Just because it is subjective doesn't mean everything is equal.

Kicad is very powerful but it is also very unintuitive (to the average user). You can't just dismiss that fact because it is subjective.
A letter from Michael Horvath, Strava co-founder and CEO
Yeah this is my experience cross-checking the article with my own Bing AI. Try and replicate the Appendix section and Bing AI gets everything right for me.
I find ligatures makes certain symbols instantly recognizable. Two characters, such as "=>" or "<-" look like math symbols, but then it takes one more step to realize no it's an arrow.
You can pry Monaco out of my cold, dead hands. It reminds me of the old "rock" or "t" font on Linux, which someone helped me re-find here: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/226593/where-can-i-....)

Unfortunately, I've tried using a version of Monaco on Windows, and whatever version I downloaded just doesn't... quite... render just right. So I stick with Droid Sans Mono on that _other_ OS.
This is the "criminals^H^H^H^H^H tech companies will steal content anyway, so why bother?" argument, but that seems defeatist to me. Laws forcing tech companies to attribute sources for generated content would help.
I'm waiting for the legal case that decides if AI generated content is considered protected speech or not.
I'll would currently use it as it has been named: ChatGPT
Would you trust some stranger in a chat on serious topics without questioning critically? Some probably would, I not.
Isn't their main office/HQ in a really dangerous part of town crime wise?
This isn't quite the kind of conflict I meant, since the licenses are compatible and the maintainer just doesn't want to do it.
Ahh, the weekly paycheck justification meeting. So demoralizing. Treat me like a adult that can get things done.
Indeed, a good example is that people overestimate how many pounds they can lose in the short term, and underestimate how many pounds they can gain in the long term.
> ChatGPT is amazing but shouldn’t be available to the general public.

It's a parlor game, and a good one at that. That needs to be made clear to the users, that's all.
Yes, that's a lot of core developer resources that get funnelled into solving the same problems over and over again, instead of making small, gradual improvements to the existing language and tooling. (Also, it sure is a lot of fun.)

And why did all those forks come into existence?

Elm stagnated because the BDFL didn't feel like it.
Definitely not — I used that mostly because I think a lot of people really wanted to believe the post-Cold War future was going to be small-scale operations like that with limited hostilities and popular support. What came next was relatively predictable to anyone who'd studied history but a lot of 17 year olds weren't doing a deep-dive in their rush to get out of a depressing farm town.
Reminds me of the saying: 'Instead of being fired by my employer, I fired my employer and they are no longer allowed to work with me, so I left'.
No, I don't think inheritance tax factors in here that much. Wash sale rules don't really apply when using the step up basis loophole.
well you also removed the attribution clause.
I don't know about agony, but your ability to pay for it depends on having an underclass whose time is significantly less valuable than your own. You're talking about having servants (servants as a gig of course).
NYT alone costs > $15/month. Hard to imagine a bundle costing only that, unless it comes with article count restrictions. That would annoy the crap out of me.
Are all machine learning models bad? Surely there could be some machine learning models that are so simplistic in nature that they could be considered "harmless." It seems like the purpose and scope of the model is not considered by most people when they are debating over AI.
Unfortunately, a single developer carrying an entire software team is a common pattern in the industry. I've been in both your situation and the situation of your team mates. If left unaddressed, the organizational momentum will perpetuate this situation. Stakeholders will continue to consider you the trusted party to get things done. This is not only a problem for you, but the organization as well, because your departure could create significant problems stemming from a loss of knowledge.

You may deserve more compensation, but it doesn't solve the problem in the long-term. As you have said, "There is little to no confidence in the others carrying on successfully if I suddenly stopped." Rendering that statement false is the solution. As the lead, it is your responsibility to improve the productivity of your team mates and build trust between them and the organization. It can be a slow process, but one that creates a more sustainable and harmonious situation for both you and your team. As long as you continue to absorb all the work, the situation will never improve.

Here are a few suggestions I've seen work in the past:

- Spend time on an extended vacation. This forces your team members to pick up the slack. It's better than quitting, giving everyone an opportunity to experience you being a single point of failure without the long term catastrophic consequences. Have a frank discussion about how to fix things upon your return.

- Offload yourself as a point of contact for various projects. Hand over initiatives to your fellow team mates. Force stakeholders to meet with them instead of you. Make yourself available to help them succeed.

- Make tasks more digestible for your team mates. Aggressively document things, make tickets easy to understand, set up knowledge sharing sessions.

- Hand new initiatives to your team mates. Let them specify the details.

- Talk to your manager, see if they have any thoughts on how to improve the situation. They are the last person who wants to deal with the fallout of your departure.

- Talk to your team mates, see what motivates them. What do they think they can do to improve the situation? It's not uncommon for team members to feel resentment for you absorbing all of the work.
> how

Yes, it's what thinkers do :)

Statements come from their own processing.

> LMs

I am afraid the term 'Language Model' does not fit the category; 'Statistical Language Model' is required to define (after interpretation) what they do. Not all Language Models need to be based on relational frequencies of term occurrence.

(Hopefully, some will be even based on mechanisms of Intelligence - the opposite.)

> «the theory and development [...]»

If you wanted to quote John McCarthy (project proposal for the Dartmouth summer seminar, 1955), the actual words were «An attempt will be made to find how to make machines use language, form abstractions and concepts, solve kinds of problems now reserved for humans, and improve themselves».

I reckon the letter of what you quoted seems to be a "merriamwebsterism" - inherently with limited authority, because dictionaries typically express use, not meaning.

> qualify

The output of text must be an intelligent composition to fit into the context of a «task» that «require[s] human intelligence», as per the definition you proposed - because you do not need «human intelligence» to delirate (as in, outputting text not filtered by intelligence).

> minority

If that ever were an indicator, it would suggest the possibility of a promising stance, given that in Paretian distributions (what you actually find outside of selected groups) the function of the majority is poor.
A company is a legal fiction, and cannot be loyal. People can be loyal, and often are
Chinese i underestand. But the Americans ? The land of the free ? The hearth of democracy ? /s
Yes, this one is in the same top tier along with Fira, Hack, JetBrains, and Inconsolata.
Have you 3D printed any of the buildings in your data-set?

Specifically bridges, and would it be easy to extract just bridges from your set?
My condolences to GitHub staff.
The patent troll is what killed the business plan in the end because there was zero margin. The real problem seems to me that it is difficult to compete with a nicely integrated 30 usd echo dot if people rather pay it with their personal data (this actually includes me). Mycroft also technically was falling short even for its potential target audience. They had a hard time even without that troll.

If I would do this I would rather repurpose (and potentially resell) off the shelf mobile phones with a custom stand and rather get the software right first.
Been working in Data Analytics for 10 years now. Been trying to look for another job myself.

Much different than it was a few years ago. I had a response rate of about 60% and had multiple interviews each week. Now I would say my response rate is about 10% at the moment.
> You basically require a simulated mind to even begin to grasp the nuances of fact vs perspective vs opinion.

I’ve done a little testing of this (using HN comments!) and ChatGPT seems to be reasonably good at distinguishing fact vs. opinion. It seems in that limited testing to be slightly more likely to view as opinion things I would view as likely fact claims but where the operationalization intended is ambiguous as opinion, but the boundary between a fact claim with an unstated operationalization and an opinion claim is fuzzy.

That doesn’t get a lot closer to checking fact claims, or identifying and deciding when and how to report supporting evidence of them, but I don’t think that distinguishing fact claims is, itsef, as far beyond reach of current technology as you are describing it.
I'm certainly not arguing that it's the only reason, or even a primary reason, but it absolutely is a reason. We can debate the extent to which sales decline is attributable to this all day long, but fact of the matter is, x86 CPU manufacturers are hurting right now, and I'm sharing an option for anyone at those companies who might be reading that can alleviate some of that pain. Like I've said in other comments, if I could get a 7950x without AMD ST (formerly PSP), I'd eagerly pay $2500 for it, and I definitely wouldn't be the only one.
> "Wonder how they feel about Newton's laws of motion and gravity?"

"Gravity" is explicitly mentioned in the article:

"In passing the bill, Montana would prevent any scientific ideas that are not established as 'facts' -- which would bar the teaching of evolution, gravity, and other integral ideas that form the basis of scientific knowledge today."
This is such a great product and a must have for new age API based products. Congrats on the launch!
your isp is sharing an IP with other customers? i have never, ever seen that in 3 countries worth of residential isps and doubt its possible and want to make sure its true (and concerning)
Being aware and caring about it are different things. When I was a child and my family went to a beach (which was roughly maybe 2 weeks out of a year), parents encouraged tanning a lot. "Get those sun vitamins" and all.

And then my grandfather died from skin cancer. You bet that as an adult, I am not exposing much of my skin to sun at all when I am out on a sunny day, and I apply sunscreen to my face daily. I have no issues with being shirtless otherwise, and do it quite often, mostly at the gym.

Disclaimer: my gym is a small local one, not a massive chain, and being shirtless there is both explicitly allowed and is very common. At any given point, about a quarter of the people there will be shirtless.
wonder what he has to say about the humanlike responses here

https://www.reddit.com/r/bing/comments/110eagl/the_customer_...

I would rather an AI chat not act human
That seems like a pretty good open-core project with the core under the Apache 2.0 license. Still, unlike GitLab, I haven't heard of many running their own custom Element and until I do I'm a bit wary of lock-in.
N = 1. 18:6 for me. 2PM to 8PM, with occasional falling off the wagon due to social obligations or just simply forgetting to eat and then realizing I need to eat. I have noticed if I eat sugary snacks with my last meal that I get ravenously hungry much earlier the next day. There are some days where I unintentionally forget to eat until 4PM or so.

I tried 16:8 but it never seemed to have any effect on weight loss for the 2PM to 10PM range. And my weight would creep up with that regimen. I suspect that might be related to late night hormonal changes in the human body preventing the digestion of certain types of food. I should try a 16:8 with 12PM to 8PM at some point and track the results.