skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
These technologies can and likely will help improve search in the future, but there is still a ton of work to be done both on how specifically to use them and also on scaleability.

There is also the business model to sort out. Right now search is primarily driven by ads, which I doubt will cover the costs of the sort of ultra-personalization that you're thinking about. Also, reducing the time you spend on a search engine or looking through results will further reduce ad revenue. However, I can see paid search engines perhaps leading to this.

So yes, eventually these models can help improve search, just not in the form that we have today. In a few years the story could well be different. I'm quite interested in seeing how Bing integrates chatgpt technology. They claim that they've created some new model on top of it that somehow links it to search results.
The point is that the average American dev takes home a lot more cash than European devs.

Whether e.g. healthcare premiums comes out of my paycheck separately or is paid via higher taxes is just accounting.
I strongly recommend releasing it even if you don't think it's good.

I wrote a book, and I don't think it's especially good, but I've gotten a lot of respect for having published it because people think it's hard.
>"Turbo Native is a small framework to build high-fidelity hybrid apps."

Is it me or there are way too many buzzwords in a single sentence? And "high-fidelity hybrid" is a real pearl.
Download cisco packet tracer (you need to sign up for a learning account):

* https://www.netacad.com/courses/packet-tracer

It is network simulation software that simulates down to the hardware level and will let you setup networks and see how they work as individual packets move through.
Writing Code on a Gameboy
It took me two hours to write a simple game for the gameboy on the gameboy. 5 bytes of the 8KiB work ram are used for variables, 100 bytes for the addresses of the labels and the rest is available for freely programmable opcodes.
What's the functional difference between a psychology manual imprinted on an AI neural network versus a biological one?
> having a family where everyone gets along

To say this is fortunate is an understatement.
Ouch with those down votes. Prolly don't say "all" cause absolutes are almost always wrong. But the sentiment is correct. They're not in those positions because they're technically smart, but because they're good at social climbing and empire building. And in my experience exceptionally bereft of integrity. Layoffs are a tool in their C level signaling system. Maybe they're good for the company and maybe they're not, but they're doing what the other C levels are going so they're mostly safe from repercussions and scrutiny.
The site is crap, but the advice is spot on
I would add to that GPG just doesn’t work. They have support for it but if you try to use it fails to store any keys.
At least it seems she's doing okay. Money, fame and attention can ruin lives, especially if obtained at a young age.
Nope; this is some $5 IAP nonsense. I refuse to support people who rentseek on top of f/oss.
Okay, so not that dissimilar to an Electron stack after all.
> turns screenshots into dramatically angled photos

> much more interesting than just zoom/pan

yes, Ken Burns goes beyond zoom/pan and over into dramatically slanted, at least for what purports to be documentary.
Ah - I forgot he had passed. I meant the sexual misconduct issues.
I've had an opposite experience when trying to get it to solve a puzzle. First it said that it didn't have a certain piece of information which I promptly provided, then it started going in circles, bullshitting about different pieces of "missing" information, all of which had been provided.

It's really good at faking logical reasoning abilities up to a certain point but it very quickly falls apart and starts returning nonsense.
The dotfiles and dotfolders directly in the home folder is "the way it was always done", and now some "new kids" came and want changes done to software which has existed before they were even born. People have muscle memory for those folders, some have hardcoded those paths in other scripts, others just don't care, and things stay as they always were.

On one hand, it's great to have all the stuff in the same place, on the other hand, we used to have this, before the ~/.config folder too.

Also, it's not just in one place anymore, but in many places -- so to completely remove a programX, it's not enough to just remove ~/.programX, but you need to remove a folder from ~/.config/, and another one from ~/.local/something, and another form ~/.cache,...

So yeah, i understand 'the old guys' too... maybe because i'm not 20-something anymore.
Well you aren't wrong. Even still, I'd take disappointment any and every day over the emptiness.
Actually, if you accept to work for free, a good business decision would be to stop paying you.

Would you act personally surprised or offended or hurt if your company made that business decision?
Never too late, by the way. It could be a lot of fun to travel around and meet your relatives. Or not :) But only way to find out.
Yeah I think it’s one of the less-hard things about Forth. For what it’s worth I quite enjoyed fiddling with Forth, and went through a bit of a “stack computing” phase. I never made the connection with the the pipe operator tho
Reddit stopped publishing their source code a long time ago, so I hope the hackers publish whatever they took.
The latter position says "No longer accepting applications"
I don't think you've represented the camps fairly (actually, I don't think there are two camps). Most people (here) are probably not arguing that AGI is impossible, but that current AI is not generally intelligent. The John Carmack quote is exactly in line with this. He says "ride those to [AGI]," meaning they are not AGI. The idea that genuine intelligence and self-awareness could emerge from increasingly powerful statistical models is in no way the kind of counter-cultural idea you seem to be presenting it as. I think almost all of us believe that.

But ChatGPT is not it.
You can fly light sport as long as you’ve never had your medical disqualified. So just never get a medical and it’s never a problem.
Yeah, I meant past prime, slimy, partially eaten by slugs etc.
Looks like this post is flagged too... I'm also competing with you/co pilot with https://text-generator.io but I'm on Bing, take a deep look into your site/SEO etc and tip of the day for generative companies like ours is that we can generate a whole bunch of examples for SEO.

Normally HN and Reddit are less moderated than other sites that do a lot of shadow banning, condolences for getting stomped on by large co's and also welcome to the internet
FWIW in my experience the first retirement never sticks for these folks.
Here's [1] a picture of the conference room on an Italian high speed train.

I've seen similar rooms/compartments on other trains, but I can't remember which and can't find any more examples.

[1] https://www.seat61.com/trains-and-routes/frecciarossa.htm
Is there a good reason to use VLANs? I’ve never really seen the need for it. It’s good practice to secure all your services even in a home network. And in the end you have access to all the services anyway at some point.

Also why 3 raspberrys, instead of one with a few containers on them? Especially the 4s draw quite some power, just from a power saving perspective I would only run one.
Try having video calls.
it worked on me! i was super impressed. and then you leave the oval office and it turns out it was floating in a much larger room. Cool effect, best office i've ever been to. I think they got rid of the desk (or made it not the entrance) when trump got elected
> it was active within 30 seconds of the collision (which is like 3x longer than the time shown on the video

Merely stating it was active _within_ 30 seconds, that doesn’t mean it was deactivated at the 30 second mark. Or am I missing something?
Feels like we need something more than just a national bill.

Something like the European Convention on Human Rights, ratified into local law by each country. That would be much harder politically to overturn by the next parliament.

Can't see it happening though.
Goal is not to replace centralized databases, target market is companies that want to enter blockchain possibly through tokenization, or startups that are looking to create a decentralized application.
it indeed understands you. A lot of people are just parroting the same thing over and over again saying it's just a probabilistic word generator. No, it's not, it's more then that.

Take a look at this: https://www.engraved.blog/building-a-virtual-machine-inside/

Read to the end. The beginning is trivial the ending is unequivocal: chatGPT understands you.

I think a lot of people are just in denial. Because the last year there's been the same headlines over and over again and some people get a little too excited about the headlines and other armchair experts just try to temper the excitement with their "expert opinions" on LLMs that they read from popular articles. Then when something that's an actual game changer hits the scene (chatGPT) they completely miss it.

chatGPT is different. From a technical perspective, it's simply an LLM with additional reinforcement training... BUT you can't deny the results are remarkable.

If anything this much is clear to me: We are at a point where we can neither confirm or deny whether chatGPT represents some aspect of sentience.

This is especially true given the fact that we don't even fully know what sentience is.
Interestingly, I REALLY want the exact OPPOSITE of this.

Many times it's just so frustratingly difficult to take a screenshot of something on a computer screen and send it over one of the several mobile messaging apps that don't have a good desktop client, so I end up just taking a picture of the physical computer screen with my mobile phone. It looks like shit but I'm lazy. I really wish a piece of software could recognize what I just took a picture of and then pull the actual data from that portion of the screen, send the screen data over bluetooth or Wi-Fi or whatever to the phone, and "fix" the screenshot.
But they're getting rid of the LODA requirement for experimentals at least so flight training can be done again in them at least.
It's all about the finals though. The best ever needs to prove it by winning the most championships.
No because consent is required for it to be on in the first place.
A version that pops out the video on the site could be cool (like, takes in a screenshot but then tilts and zooms it as a video clip). Very “nightly news.”
When you own a car, you typically only use it a small percentage of the day (it certainly is true of the average owner). When you're offering a ride service, that one car is being utilized a much higher proportion of the day.

Ignoring the driver, taxi/ride-hail/autonomous-ride services are much more efficient uses of a vehicle over time. (And this is just a side note, but obviously if you don't have to pay for a human driver, you make the cost of operating the vehicle much lower per kilometre, and then it becomes much more attractive, from a purely financial POV, for most people than owning their own vehicle.)
I’ve seen reports of a few hundred dollars per seat per month. I’m sure it varies widely depending on how big the enterprise is.
It was completed in every sense of the word. It was merely awaiting approval/certification.

https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-business-europe-ru...
Yep, just recently switched to Evolution which is considerably faster and has a nicely working calender.
Is there something that puts VyOS in a separate class than openwrt/*sense? I really liked VyOS when I tried it out, but OpenWRT seems like _mostly_ the same thing. A bit less polished, but more likely to run on different vendor's hardware and let me unify the software without shelling out for a bunch of brand name gear.

I tend to agree on the VLAN stuff. I don't feel like I've found a good reason to do that on my home network (yet, at least). Fanless gear is also great.
How do you use a phone then?
Look on chain. Kraken is one of the largest ATOM validators.
The most important reason you should be using Linux at home
Every IC has their direct manager: team lead or something like that. Every decent manager knows who is underperforming in their team and secretly dreams about firing the slacker and hiring someone better instead, but rarely has such freedom. Now, the layoff is suddenly breaking. It's a no-brainer to jump the train and finally make it for the sake of the entire team.
But keep in mind many times electrical conduit is not used as a bona fide conduit, but rather more of a physical convenience (note how the bit you quoted is talking about conductors not cables. So if you bury a length of PVC pipe (grey or white) with a cat6 network cable plus a UF power cable (required for the wet location, regardless of the pipe), you're fine.

Although residential in the US rarely (never?) goes above 170 volts (peak), which is more forgiving than the ~325V of most of the world.
Thunderbird 2 was nice. After that they just made it worse and worse.
most of the time an airplane is at altitude where there is a lot less stuff in the air. (and when they're at low attitudes, they are going a lot slower)
Buffering. The stream may start quicker with gigabit. Especially when fast forwarding through a 4K movie, fast network can speed it up.
Getting treated for cancer, for example, effectively bars you from flying. There are lots of medical things like this.

If these things are that bad, those same people shoudn't be driving either. And this is probably true. However, if you applied these same restrictions to driving, people would absolutely go nuts on you.
Or cars can get smaller...
Suppose you've got an average, B-grade engineer who has been doing this job for 3 years. They should have all the technical knowledge tuned to do this job, connections to all the right people they need to work with, and all kinds of institutional memory about why everything is the way it is.

You let that person go, and bring in an objectively better, A-grade worker. It's going to take months to find that person, more months to train them, and still more time before they're fully operational the way the last employee was. And you still have risks, that they're really a C but they talked a good game in the interview. Or they're not going to be satisfied doing this job for long. Or they're not even going to take the offer when you make it.

And yet, in my experience the average company won't try very hard to keep people. They'll give them mediocre raises for far less than they'd be willing to hire someone into that position for, and do very little otherwise to try to keep them happy until they have one foot out the door. I don't get it, it doesn't make sense from the coldest and most calculating perspective I can give it, but with some notable exceptions it seems that's just how it works.
Thanks! And another tool recommended to me: https://crccalc.com/
When that "action to stop it" is bombing a civilian capital quite distant from the warring groups, you can understand people might not be enthusiastic about that.
What people are willing to pay for it is the value of it, I guess. Capitalism :shrug:
Consider this: our family has three cars for four people. We often have all three in different places, but rarely are all three _being driven_ at the same time. If a car could ferry itself autonomously between destinations, it’s a huge gain for logistical flexibility and we could probably get away with two or even one car.
Provided employee productivity is the same (or better) this model still has Zendesk ahead. It doesn't really matter if utilization is low - if you've closed 10% of your offices you're paying 10% less rent than you were before.

Would there be opportunities for further efficiency by fully closing them and renting space a few times a year? Possibly, yes. But that doesn't mean the current model isn't an improvement on the previous one.
By host is rather useless, because you can spoof hostnames and MAC addresses.
Especially if YCbCr is a linear transform of the RGB. (I'm not sure if it is, but it's likely to be close). If it is, it's essentially just making eigenvectors from a matrix with a different set of bases.
The headline says "From China" the article says "In China" twice in the first couple of paragraphs.
> but not everyone in tech is an asshole.

But the evidence says otherwise. Broken hiring, big egos, bad software. This field is a mess and the people made it like this.
If you don't like blockchain or the technology that is fine. No need for insults :) And for "dumbest people", I'd look where the top 100 companies are investing their money and resources, and I don't think I would call them dumb.
If the whole thing is such a big, crumbling Lego tower, and it's going to take three years just to fix the problems it has now, this doesn't seem like a compelling argument to keep using it. Surely at some point it must be easier to abandon it and start over - obviously that won't just solve all problems, but there must be a line where the cost of maintaining the current thing outweighs the cost of a rewrite.
Right. I self custody most of my stuff, but I do stake a few coins with Kraken because the amount is relatively small and it's easier. Taking away this service is annoying.
Ask HN: Seeking Understanding: Disability Accommodations in Technical Interviews
I am writing this post to seek some understanding and insights from others who may have gone through a similar experience. As someone with severe ADHD, I find technical interviews to be a significant challenge, even though I am confident in my abilities to perform the work that is needed and expected.

Recently, I had a conversation with a former technical recruiter who suggested requesting accommodations for my disability during interviews. I am reaching out to the community to ask if anyone has ever made such a request and what their experience was like.

In my case, the rapid-fire nature of technical interviews often leaves me feeling flustered and unable to effectively answer questions. I know that my brain functions differently, but I am eager to find ways to overcome these limitations and showcase my skills and abilities in the interview process.

I would greatly appreciate any thoughts, considerations, and criticism on this topic. If anyone has gone through a similar experience, I would love to hear about what worked for you and what didn't.
This article inspires to ask a fundamental question "What do we expect/want AI to work like?". Do we want a xerocopying machine, providing verbatim copies or are we willing to accept that intelligence is connected to creativity and interpretation so the resulting output will be processed and might contain errors, ommissions etc. To be honest the same applies to humans. There's this passage in the article:

>If a large-language model has compiled a vast number of correlations between economic terms—so many that it can offer plausible responses to a wide variety of questions—should we say that it actually understands economic theory?

In the above passage we can easily switch "larger-language model" to "Professor Jean Tirole" and ponder how high do we set the bar for AI. Can we accept AI only if it will be flawless and "more intelligent" (whatever that means) than all humans?
Thanks for the advice, will definitely take it into consideration.
I love that, especially when the giants are playing and tons of people are having a good time when you are on your way home from work.
Also funny when they exit in the city and the police immediately greets them and makes them throw away any leftovers ;)
Great Analysis on Impact of Bing on Google Search Business
This probably goes without saying since you presumably just read this article, but I always tell people to actually check the website like they're trying to buy service before moving somewhere new. This is a particularly important for me personally because I have a slightly-petty personal vendetta against Comcast, so I'll only live somewhere that has Verizon FiOS (or a comparable fiber provider).

Even this method can be flawed - there might be a hefty installation fee, or you might run into a situation where even though service is technically offered at your new place but it's not physically possible to install. My mom and I ran into the latter situation years ago when she moved into a new house during a FiOS installer strike. They scheduled installations weekly for a month or two, optimistically thinking they'd reach an agreement I suppose, but nobody ever showed up. We eventually had to sign up with Comcast, which sort of got us through a few months until it was possible to get FiOS installed.
I think you're overthinking it.

If I ask ChatGPT to explain something to me like I'm 5, it's going to lose some of the quality in its response, in compared to it being written in 1000 words.
> I’m pretty sure everyone understands you can’t compare the price drops of electronics with durable goods.

The government doesn't. They artificially suppress inflation numbers by counting technological progress as deflation.
Speaking about opportunity cost of folks pursuing AI like a mad crowd... I started a ChatGPT competitor https://text-generator.io let me know what you think .. or if it's too much...
Ask HN: How many engineers have direct access to production where you work?
I've seen situations where everyone on the engineering team have direct SSH access to the production database and other cases where practically no one does, and everything is done through GitOps or similar peer-reviewed migrations. Curious what have you seen when it comes to production access?
After dealing with the traffic in Charminar, I'd probably share the same sentiment.
But should the P100D or any other car noted for its sudden acceleration even be allowed to exist? We're putting GPS radios on electric scooters so they can't exceed 10MPH in school zones, meanwhile drunk bozos can tap 1000HP if they want.
I am not in the field so I cannot speak very eloquently what it would mean for machine learning algorithm to "ever know something". But I feel that e.g. Simulations and perhaps expert systems of yore, were qualitatively closer to getting there. Their error modes were radically different. They started inductively with rules, rather than arriving at them statistically almost by accident.
> These tasks are used to test theory of mind because for people, language is a reliable representation of what type of thoughts are going on in the person's mind.

I actually think that human language is unreliable at expressing what's going on inside a persons mind[1]. My native language is not English, I have only introductory-level knowledge in the field of pragmatics[2], which makes me fully aware of the many ways in which I could fail to write a compelling sentence to support my argument. I can use language to only approximate thoughts in my head, and when it comes to abstract concepts and ideas, words alone, I assert, are never sufficient. It isn't even necessary to step outside our main knowledge area to illustrate this point. How many around here have read a Monad tutorial, without any hands-on experience, and how many of those have understood what Monads are/or how they work from words alone?

My entire paragraph from before, just to set the stage on a simple question. How can you even formulate a question, for a multi-billion parameter language model, to evaluate that it can understand in an abstract/conceptual way something/anything? Heck, how can you do that with other people? I think if we'd have an answer here, we actually could evaluate easily experience/expertise with anyone we'd interview; instead of requiring credentials, references, tests, trials, etc.

[1] Lots of poets from the romanticism era liked to touch upon this topic. One that comes to mind, and one of my personal favorites, is Silentium by Fyodor Tyutchev https://culturedarm.com/silentium-by-fyodor-tyutchev/

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatics