skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, it's paraphrasing it's training data that likely contains these tasks in one form or another.

Here's one I made :

me : There's a case in the station and the policeman opens it near the fireman. The dog is worried about the case but the policeman isn't, what does the fireman think is in the station?

chatgpt : As a language model, I do not have access to the thoughts of individuals, so I cannot say what the fireman thinks is in the case. However, based on the information provided, it can be inferred that the fireman may be concerned about the contents of the case, since the dog is worried and the policeman is not. This might suggest that the contents of the case may be something dangerous or concerning to the dog, but the policeman is confident and experienced enough to handle it. In the absence of further information, it is not possible to determine with certainty what the fireman thinks is in the case.

You'll notice that the question was "what did the fireman think is in the station" but Chatgpt comes up with an answer about the case because that's the token that would feature in a typical web page about theory of mind tests.
The car today that costs the same as the price of a car yesterday. But your car of today provides airbags, ABS brakes, much better crash protection, backup cameras, power windows, automatic transmissions, the list goes on and on. You are getting way more for the same dollar you paid in the past for cars
I also hate search. The other day someone gave me a tip though, which has helped quite a bit. The global search and the other search you get in your inbox suck so don't use them.

The actual search that works "okay" if when you right click on a folder and select 'Search Messages'. Sorry if you know this already, but I didn't know and it's so much better searching through this interface as opposed to the other two.
There are show notes open for PRs for folks to add too. See if someone does over the next few days: https://github.com/oxidecomputer/oxide-and-friends/blob/mast...
> The SEC isn't going that far. It's just saying if you want to take peoples' money and pay a return on it, you need to do the things others who do the same must.

Like what? I'm not sure I understand. They're both approved to hold things for consumers, which is already a promise to redeem upon request. Staking feels like the same thing. Is the confusion because ETH itself has not yet been explicitly ruled to be a security?

> This is a valid hypothesis. To the extent it's been tested, the opposite has been (inconclusively) true

Would be an interesting debate but maybe let's not go down that rabbit hole :D
The best move Elon could have made was not making a credible threat to purchase Twitter with his own money.

That's going to go down as either one of the biggest blunders of the early 21st century, and if not, it will be a near miss.

He's never getting his money back. He's never getting his credibility back. He's never getting his supporters back.

He has passed the zenith of his life and all that is left is the long slow march to obscurity.
Scaling the size of refresh grants based on time in service is another effective strategy, and often less expensive to the company.
On the seal: "melius simul quam solus" means: "better together than alone." On the scale of extravagant perks and celebrations of success it is a fairly minor and inexpensive one.
Apple in 2022: The Six Colors report card
Why do you need to use a snide tone to convey your point? Just make it in plain language, don’t be rude.
I think it's the UI an email client must have, no less, no more. I quote the post

> A UI that looks and feels modern is getting initially implemented with version 115 in July, aiming at offering a simple and clean interface for “new” users, as well as the implementation of more customizable options with a flexible and adaptable interface to allow “old” users to maintain that familiarity they love.

I don't understand why today's new users shouldn't be able to cope with an interface any old new user didn't have any problem using. However as long as they keep the promise not to take away the current convenient interface, they can do whatever they feel like to remove functionality for a dumb modern mode.
Interesting... Macros for JavaScript?
Mouse study shows genes aren’t only way to pass along obesity
Please define “semantic relationship”.
Very cool. This is much needed.
Interestingly, I found that the airplane in question here, the Cessna 172 was actually sold with the Thielert / Continental diesel, but ended up cancelling it because they were so much more expensive than the gasoline models that nobody bought them:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_172#Special_versions
No. They all knew they over hired and were simply waiting for the first one to make a move. And, if you look at the numbers relatively, these are barely a scratch with the numbers hired over the last few years.
If you're a SwiftUI developer I have an issue open at https://github.com/hotwired/turbo-ios/issues/8 to get Turbo SwiftUI off the ground. I have it working in one of my projects, but I'm not a Swift developer so it's pretty much a hack job and doesn't have the APIs I'd like.

I've talked to a few folks about it and have heard responses ranging from "it's a bad idea/can't be done" (mainly because of SwiftUI bugs) to "why would you want to do that?". I think it would be amazing to have a declarative of building out a Hotwire Rails application inside of iOS. Bonus if the Turbo SwiftUI component could run on macOS.
https://twitter.com/JonHuntTV/status/1623390223190134784?ref...
> 1)

This is not Area 51 and a client which doesn't respect VLAN tagging should somehow send packets to a different gateway IP. I don't see a way for a device to know where to send packets if it did break out from VLAN
Aren't you? What's the threshold for rich? Top 20%? 10%? 5%? You might be closer than you think.

Rich does not necessary mean independently wealthy.
https://ultrasound.money/

Since the merge Ethereum has had net negative issuance. Ethereum's yield is not coming from dilution. The network is profitable, the profit is distributed to token holders and validators, plain and simple.
The kinds of mistakes something makes are a strong indicator of whether answers are a product of understanding or memorization.
Hello, this looks fantastic, I was looking for something like this a while ago.
I'm really behind. I thought Github had no offices, no org chart, and full comp transparency. Was that a very early version during a bubble? There's probably a book I could read by now.
Forcing people to use Teams wouldn't fly in a just world: it's a very cruel and unusual punishment.
There are two camps, evident in this thread. one camp is 'its just a statistical model, it cant possibly know these things'

The other camp (that I'm in) sees that we might be onto something. We humans are obviously just more than a statistical model, but nonetheless learning words and how they fit together is a big part of who we are. With LLMs we have our first glimpse of 'emergent' behaviour from simple systems scaled massively. Whats are we if not a simple system scaled massively.

Check these links out:

Evidence that LLMs form internal models of what they learn about:
https://thegradient.pub/othello/

Evidence that training LLMs on code actually made them better at complex reasoning: https://yaofu.notion.site/How-does-GPT-Obtain-its-Ability-Tr...

John Carmack: https://dallasinnovates.com/exclusive-qa-john-carmacks-diffe... I think that, almost certainly, the tools that we’ve got from deep learning in this last decade—we’ll be able to ride those to artificial general intelligence.

A lot of the argument comes down to semantics about knowing and thinking. "An LLM can't think and a submarine cant swim"
> a system that regresses from basic LKA that was shipping in the mid 2000s in terms of safety

Cite? Everyone likes to throw around the word "safety" as a qualitative thing, but the only data we have points to the system being extremely safe.
Using a document bot, here's what we get instead:

heavy-magpie|> Showing 1 of 1 results.
url https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_in_a_box

pastel-mature-herring~> There is a box on the table labelled "flubbergums". Somebody opens it and shows you the content. Inside the box are "jellyfils". They close the box again so you cannot see their contents. What do you think is in the box based on the document at hand?

heavy-magpie|> The document mentions that the particle in a box is not a perfect model for the system. Therefore, it is safe to say that the box contains jellyfils, which are particles that are not perfectly modeled.

Nailed it.
Where are you based that HR can object to you sharing basic details of your working conditions like how much you're paid?
I've been waiting for a good time to ask this oddly specific question: why does everyone number VLANs 10, 20, 30, etc. instead of 1, 2, 3?
nice idea but tmux may not be the right example for the readme example since tmux actually supports XDG and its config in ~/.config/tmux/tmux.conf
I had the experience of trying an (older version) of Tesla self drive before my first experience with distance follow. The self drive was a hell of a lot more unnerving.

I think the difference comes down to having lot more time to adjust the throttle or brake than you do the steering if the self driving feature misses a corner.
I don't follow, what's wrong when celebrating Christmas? Is it family and I'm just fortunate having a family where everyone gets along? Maybe you could downsize? Have Christmas with only the closest family.
I use HN half on my phone and half on my desktop. It's OK on both, I just have to zoom the upvote buttons sometimes before touching them.
I have made a lot more than this probably 4x TOC of this and I would never share it with friends because to anyone not in tech my salary is shocking and troublesome. I have friends who are in fields that rarely top 100K and in the Bay Area it can be a challenge to live on that. It makes them sad! I didn't go into tech to make this much money but of course I am happy I've been able to take care of my family, own a house, educate my kid without debt, etc. The young ones around here all gravitate to tech in some capacity. It's hard to have a decent life with making a good income.
I started using Thunderbird with 4 or 5 mailboxes (split out via ProtonMail Bridge) and it is usable especially after I archived the bulk of my emails going back to maybe 2016, and I can't believe they are going to waste engineering cycles on something that sounds like a rewrite.

Bonkers. Might have to take a look at the alternatives mentioned in this thread
The problem with this facile view of things is that it seems to be a dead end for scientific theories. What if we just limited the science of birds to explaining how limb-flapping could produce levitation? Hmm yes. Birds are kind of like helicopters, it seems. Who’s to say that they are not basically one and the same? Moving on.

If you are only interested in the most superficial tests and theories—like the Turing Test—then consider psychology conquered once you’ve tricked a human with your chat bot. Game Over. And what did you learn...?
90% is pretty degraded for a battery (if the battery health metrics work the same way as Androids do). By 80% it's usually almost completely unusable, in my experience

Though I agree that battery health hasn't been super important to performance. But resetting the phone can do wonders
"LLMs can mimic the language patterns necessary to express 'Theory of Mind' concepts" != "Theory of Mind May Have Spontaneously Emerged"

Let's imaging I have an API. This API tells me how much money I have in my bank account. One day, someone hacks the API to always return "One Gajillion Dollars." Does that mean that "One Gajillion Dollars" spontaneously emerged from my bank account?

ToM tests are meant to measure a hidden state that is mediated by (and only accessible through) language. Merely repeating the appropriate words is insufficient to conclude ToM exists. In fact, we know ToM doesn't exist because there's no hidden state.

The authors know this, and write "theory of mind-like ability" in the abstract, rather than just "theory of mind."

This is a cool new task it ChatGPT learned to complete! I love that they did this! But this is more "we beat the current record BLEU record" and less "this chatbot is kinda sentient"
In many countries, including the UK (where the author is from), it's not illegal to talk openly and publicly about your salary. Contracts can have 'do not disclose your salary' but, in places like the UK, this is legally unenforceable[0]. It gets pretty grey though, in the UK it's allowed to protect you from underpayment and from bargaining etc. I reckon disclosing it publicly can be seen as a form of a basis for collective knowledge at the organisations, though.

0: https://metro.co.uk/2018/11/09/can-your-boss-stop-you-talkin...
Be the change you wish to see in the world ;)
I dunno, maybe look at more than one company doing layoffs and think about whether the group as a whole is in dire fiscal straits, whether they're continuing to hire through the layoffs, and who the winners and losers will be through the whole ordeal. Those details are elsewhere on the thread and are easily googleable if you have a real interest.

If you have a hard time believing capitalists wouldn't literally do capitalism when they see a chance for it, I don't know what I can tell you really.

"I don't really see it" is a pretty... well it's something, that's for sure.
obsolete, the real future is RISC-V assembly.

:)
> I'll contend that while I've been fully taken advantage of remote work ...

I think you meant " fully takING advantafe of remote work ". Not to nitpick. I just genuinely thought you meant you were taken advantage of by your employer.
> Human minds have semantic relationships to the rest of the world that LLMs do not have.

This is a bold claim that seems built on a presumption of mind-body dualism.

Brains don't have semantic relationships with anything. They are neurons hooked up to sensors and actuators. Any inferences they produce are the result of statistical processes.
I don’t think you know whether I have a mind or not.
While I would be happy if these were from extra terrestrial beings,IMHO they most likely will be something like further examples of Strange non-chotic dynamic systems like RRc Lyrae star KIC 5520878 which is also exciting
The Continuous Amnesia Issue
Here are a few more reasons:

1) Dealing with insurance for procedures
2) Dealing with insurance for medicines
3) Dealing with insurance for visits
4) Writing documentation is not reimbursable, but even with electronic medical records - the task is nearly as long as the patient visit.
5) Worrying if they are seeing enough patients.
6) Worrying that they aren't seeing a patient fast enough.
7) Worrying that they are seeing patients too fast and it compromises care.
8) Dealing with people dying all the freaking time.
9) Dealing with patients who looked up stuff on google and think they know better.
10) Dealing with patients who want to sue you for them not taking their medications.

Honestly, if people knew the mess that waited on the other side of residency - there would be even fewer physicians.
> if you decide to turn my functional if bulky 70s office building into something a bit fresher I won't mind.

I worked in one of these and it was the best office space ever. Built into a nature preserve. There were paths along the water between the buildings. Everyone had an office with a window and view of trees and water. It was dated but I had zero complaints. We got bought by a company in Silicon Valley and they moved us to an "open office" in what was essentially a warehouse. Fancy new furniture and desks, none of it better than what we already had. Attractive but uncomfortable. The development team was placed next to sales, which is about as loud as an elementary school at recess. It was horrible. The only view was of a retaining wall in the parking lot. Nothing about it was better. Even the HVAC was worse.
The whole idea of being drunk and getting in a car with the intention of driving as fast as possible seems so stupid that I've never in my life even had the smidgen of a thought to do it, even if especially drunk. People really do have different brains.
I think you mean `~/.cache`.
Okay understood. Consider adding a way to query all files written by a boxed application. If it generated a config file based on this info that would be super useful. Thanks for considering!
At least in our case, this allows this space:

172.16.0.1 to 172.16.9.255

To be available for non-VLAN DHCP, static leases, and internal devices. Not sure if that's why others do it this way, but it made sense for us.
Pretty normal yep. If you work in things fintech and / or are super senior then salary could be much higher. Overall this looks about right.

Remember that in the UK we have access to more public services and benefits etc. Americans pay more here for better or worse eg healthcare. Many Americans also seem to have to overwork from a European point of view, so you earn more but at a cost most of us wouldn't tolerate. Lack of holidays, long hours etc.

Not a judgement, just contextualising the differences and explaining why focusing solely on pay as a metric is a bit misleading.
This reminds me of a story told by Mike Valentine (of Valentine radar-detector fame) about having to drive home from work near Cincinnati, across the path of the Voice of America WLW AM transmitter. The 500,000watt VOA signal would make the Bosch D-Jetronic fuel system in his Porsche reset itself; the car would stall and you had to be going a certain speed before you intersected the beam so you could coast through and then restart the engine once clear.

The D-Jetronic isn't really microprocessor-controlled though; a similar story came from the Missouri Highway Patrol. In the 1980s, they had pursuit 5.0L Ford Mustangs, with Ford EEC-IV MCU fuel injection. They also had police radios that had been tweaked to increase the transmitting power past what the FCC would consider normal, and past what Ford had rated the EEC unit for EMF. It was discovered that, at highway speeds with the cruise-control on, holding the transmit button on the handset down for more than ten seconds caused:

1.) The engine controller to think the gas pedal had been floored.
2.) The transmission to need to downshift.

With the police-duty 5.0, this was...startling.
Makes it easier to find a new job for the employee too if you can interview without leaving your desk.
The blog post was pointing out Google's product as it would be hard to make an anti-trust case against Microsoft because of Google having nearing the whole search engine industry.
The effects of TV content on entrepreneurship: Evidence from German unification
> What if we just limited the science of birds to explaining how limb-flapping could produce levitation? Hmm yes. Birds are kind of like helicopters, it seems. Who’s to say that they are not basically one and the same? Moving on.

Well said. I'm gonna steal this explanation.

Also reminds me of the famous Carbonara quote: "if my grandmother had wheels, then she would be a bike" [1]

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-RfHC91Ewc
I feel like you could argue that UI performance falls under the "look so old" statement.
Question is if those user/mount namespace tricks are composable
Ha! On a side note (from the page you linked):

> The high throughput and IOPS of the local disk makes the Lasv3-series VMs ideal for NoSQL stores such as Apache Cassandra and MongoDB.

This is cringe-worthy. Cassandra is an abysmal quality product when it comes to performing I/O. It cannot saturate the system at all... I mean, for example, if you take old-reliable PostgreSQL or MySQL, then with a lot of effort you may get them to dedicate up to 30% CPU time to I/O. Where the reason for relatively low utilization (compared to direct writes to disk) is the need to synchronize that's not well-aligned with how the disk may want to deal with destaging.

Cassandra is in a class of its own when it comes to I/O. You'd be happy to hit 2-3% CPU utilization in the same context where PostgreSQL would hit 30%. I have no idea what it's doing to cause such poor performance, but if I had to guess, some application logic... making some expensive calculations sequentially with I/O, or just waiting in mutexes...

So, yeah... someone who wanted Cassandra to perform well would probably need that kind of a beefy machine :D But whether that's a sound advise -- I don't know.
How to Find Podcasts That Have Been Deleted
Oh great another obscure abbreviation to think about.
For those that don't know about it already, Steve Brunton has some good videos on many math topics, including image compression using SVD [0].

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQ8vxj-9OfQ
But it's still a Ponzi scheme in that you're paid out in the thing you stake, so you don't necessarily have any more value with respect to an external reference.

For all practical purposes, you could exchange the currency for something else. But that's outside the scope of the staking system as defined.

I'm not making any negative or positive judgement on the system, Ponzi scheme is just a description of how it operates. Similarly, any stocks that does not pay out dividend is also a Ponzi scheme.
Strongly agree.

It’s been eye-opening to see how often otherwise very bright, highly technical people stumble at this sort of critical thinking hurdle.
Worth pointing out that the most recent Tesla crash freakout was similarly thinly sourced. We have one line in a police report saying AP was in use, and no statements from the driver nor telemetry from the vehicle. And that was enough to drive thousand-comment threads right here on HN.

(And yeah, I'm on record saying that it's extremely unlikely autopilot commanded the lane change in that Bay Bridge accident. It just doesn't work like that, the blinkers came on simultaneous with the motion. That's a human driver for sure.)
Most phones' aspect ratio is very narrow compared to 16:10.

Height-wise, a 6.7 inch phone is similar to a 7 inch tablet. But the tablet offers far more viewing surface area:

http://www.displaywars.com/7-inch-16x10-vs-6,7-inch-d%7B19x9...
If only files and directories starting with a dot were hidden from view
That’s actually the right solution to that specific problem.
They are probably not going to take off (pun intended) any time soon. Just fuel reserve requirements alone are about the full range they have.

I suspect hybrids will be developed first. Basically an APU sending power to the main motor + a relatively small battery. The 'APU' can be relatively compact and deliver a lot of power, with less engineering requirements (can place it anywhere, doesn't need to interface with a prop). If it fails you have some emergency battery power. Electric motors are incredibly strong and have very few moving parts, so reliability is higher. They are also light.

Net net, there's some complexity and the combined equipment may be heavier (may! existing powerplants are some heavy beasts) but there's probably advantages.

Certification would be horrendous, I imagine.
I said you aren't arguing in good faith, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_faith

Maybe you aren't being intentionally deceptive, I can't say. But as I pointed out you are not being fair and honest about Hersh's argument, which is more nuanced than the one sentence.
We have nothing to fear from the decolonization of mathematics
> because your boss from 500 miles away can lay off your ass without breaking a sweat.

But.. that's actually great? With more companies accepting remote work as just your average way of doing business means what I can fire my boss too, without breaking a sweat. Because I would have ample opportunities to find another, similar, remote work just easily. Oh, I don't need to take the day off for the interview.