skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It depends what you mean. For example, I can run `blink curl ...` on Alpine Linux and blink will run the the dynamically linked curl binary that Alpine provides in /usr/bin/curl. So blink programs can leverage system libraries on x86_64 systems. What Blink does not do is translate dynamic ABIs. Here's what I mean by that. Let's say I write an x86_64-linux binary that calls dlopen(). It'll work on Linux. But if I scp that Linux program over to an Apple system, then it's not going to be able to dynamically open MachO .dylib files, because Blink only translates man(2) SYSCALL APIs. It would be able to dynamically load any Linux .so files I copied over though. Some of our users have experimented with this in cool ways. One contributor created a chroot'd folder in a Cygwin environment that contains an rsync'd Alpine Linux userspace (binaries, libraries, configs, and all) and then used blink to launch its /bin/bash shell. This astoundingly produced a mostly working Linux system inside Cygwin!
Because fair use and copyright infringement is more complicated than string matching.

https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-fairuse.html
I hear ya. I want to be able to just ask how to configure something on my Linux system instead of stumbling through man pages, stack exchange, and random websites hoping I am used the right verbiage to describe what I want to do. Or to have it write some boilerplate code for me while I focus on my domain specific implementation and testing.
Makes sense regarding instruction-level parallelism; someone else with an M2 measured and found performance near identical to fluxsort. What did you take those results on? Collected graphs below.

Orson: https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/ldcd...

i3-4160: https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/OBwS...

(edit) i5-6200U update: https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/vzDr...

M2: https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/ZRTj...
By the way, and this is abnormal:

My name is Matt Chaboud. My username is my last name, and I'm easy to find. I try to behave online in a way that doesn't rely on anonymity (though I recognize that that carries some risk).

But I think your point is understood. However, a handle, to me, by virtue of convention, leaves little room for confusion as to whether it is a real or artificial/partial identity (generally).
A great question for Copilot and Stable Diffusion.
You basically get poison ivy (as smoke) in your eyes/hair/lungs/everywhere
Pharma spent an additional $9.8B on marketing in past 20 years. It worked
I had a somewhat similar experience. However, before living in an area with clean air in a house, I previously lived in apartments and was well aware that the CO2 (and PM2.5) levels were unideally high. I feel like the author should maybe ask a medical professional about anxiety, unless they're just being a bit melodramatic.
This is the kind of shit I love about python. You can put this in a pre processor script so that it works for every python program you run
Sounds like Maradona
We can hear the Chief whistle in each direction every day that it passes through our part of New Mexico. But the author didn't even take a photograph of my station, Lamy NM (the get-off point for Santa Fe). Unbelievable! :)

We've only done the Lamy<->Chicago section of the Chief, but the timing is so great for that: depart both places mid-afternoon, arrive 25 hrs later (delays notwithstanding).
So what? That has nothing to do with my statement and nothing to do with your claim that no one can see benefit for weeks from SSRIs.

Are you just going to make endless unrelated statements?

How about you find a reference that says no one sees benefit, for any indication, from SSRIs for at least 2 weeks.
Fully agree. We need to stop thinking about money, wealth, etc. The fundamental issue is access to goods and services. If it is easy to build an AI robot that can build a few copies of itself which in turn create a private jet using stuff lying around on the ground, I'm not really poor though I have no money (just the robo).

So the challenge for the bad capitalists in this hypothetical is to make sure I never get said robo in the first place. How realistic will this be? Are they that hellbent on ensuring that everyone else is poor?
Elon Musk found not liable in ‘funding secured’ tweet lawsuit
I used daily to ask technical questions and it answers better than most of my colleagues and myself included.

I wouldn't call that a con. But that blogpost maybe ^^
Every time I read about running your own email server, operators warn that it is extremely hard to have your emails reliably make it into the inbox of a Gmail or Outlook user and not go to spam (or worse, silently dropped). You can set up all of DMARC, SPF, etc. and establish a clean domain and IP history and it will still be luck of the draw.

Yet obvious junk like OP is experiencing makes it through. I don't know what to think about it.
The mind-body problem sounds too Cartesian. A dualism that is a bit too outdated.

I personally have a weird intuition considering my cultural background: it makes sense to me that my consciousness would be “born” somewhere else when I die. This in contrast to most people of my cultural background, who either believe in annihilism or an ever-lasting afterlife. I don’t really understand why a little more people don’t at least find it philosophically (what’s the word?) plausible, or something.
Hah. Different quiz altogether. Another one not to field-test.
> I suspect it's just a bias we have, most people aren't doing or creating anything, they aren't solving problems or learning new things constantly like engineers do, so chatgpt feels useless to them.

> Or perhaps the problems we want to talk or learn about are just easier for an ai to answer than the things they want out of it

I think the ABOVE two lines captures the real CORE of why they are two big groups of ChatGPT : supporters and haters

For technical people who are in coding, we may spend 20 minutes with many suggestions to get the final correct code. We test the code and Check-in into github and we EARNED a part of LIVING for that day (as employee).

Now take non-technical person, he is writing an article. He may spend one hour giving various suggestions to complete the article. At the end the article is OK, but not the best. He can not send it to some magazine or news paper, because it is not THE BEST. So in order have an article to have it accepted, he needs to have his ORIGINAL thinking. So in that sense ChatGPT is not SO helpful for him, for that one hour spent he feel ChatGPT is a Conman.

The point I am trying to make: for ChatGPT to be useful for a Technical person with a piece of code, ChatGPT does not have to be ORIGINAL thinker and produce the BEST, it can be average and It has existing template( previous code which workd), all it need to figure out is how to get to that existing solution.
AI models spit out photos of real people and copyrighted images
Gathering data through queries should be a straightforward task and I can imagine this creates value, but understanding the complexities of the data is much more challenging to solve. For example, the fact that business unit A and business unit B have different ways of counting metric X due to a random director's decision made like a decade ago, or that there is a missing two weeks of data from a table due to a load process failure, or that one table's timestamp is in a different time zone compared to all the others, I doubt it could handle

As a seasoned Data Scientist, I've witnessed the rise and fall of many tools and technologies. However, I don't believe that we are close to eliminating the need for human involvement. Domain expertise is often underestimated, the time it takes to type a query is overestimated and the number of times you get a random shower thought that makes you realize you've been asking the wrong question all along are countless
Heh, persona as a service. Sounds a bit like the "new identity" thing in Breaking Bad. But online, and an alter ago.
> The main reason behind my decision is that I used to share the revenue to track my solo journey. Now with someone else on my team, it’s no longer my personal milestone anymore. I somehow have to be responsible for the whole team.

Interesting how when revenue was likely equating to profit, they are open to sharing. When they have to pay someone else to help out, they want it to be a secret. I don't think the motivating factor here is very complex at all.
I can offer you search engine bookmarks as an alternative way to achieve this. For example, I have bookmarked https://www.npmjs.com/search?q=%s with the keyword `n`, and https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/search?q=%s with the keyword `mdn`. In the location bar, I type `mdn font-family` and submit, and this kicks off the search.
Will it improve though? I’m not a GPT hater or denier, but how do you even predict that it hasn’t already hit the wall? They can increase parameter count x100 again, but correctness is not some knob they can just dial up to 10. What if a learning dataset simply has not enough info for a correct answer to have a greater weight than all the “con” noise? What if an answer requires a sort of reasoning inaccessible to LLMs?

Stories itt can as well be boiled down to “I fed it with corrections for some time and it didn’t f..k up this last time and finally included everything into the answer”. What makes you think it would not do just that better or quicker?

Edit: Another probably highly related question is, can it answer “I don’t know this / not sure about these parts”? Never seen that in chat logs.
hmm, do you have a hidpi display

i wonder if it's using a bitmap fallback font that it ought to blow up by 2× or 3× because of hidpi, but isn't
*sips*
I've had 2x Samsung 980 Pro 2TB fail in as many years. Last time I buy Samsung.
It's a strange framing of what happened.

Musk didn't battle the shareholders.

He was accused of doing something illegal but after both sides presented their story to the jury of our peers, the peers found that he did not, in fact, do anything illegal.

So it's more like shareholders falsely accused him of doing something illegal and the courts found that he didn't.
I just wish they'd do that to me!
It's almost like... people really want to find meaning and purpose in an occupation, community in the place they spend at least half of their waking hours, and work they can be proud of. How... immature?

I agree that the present society cannot generally fulfill these wants/needs.
That’s not really true - while the islands proper are pretty much just pastures, there’s oil & gas in the boundaries.
Well said, I appreciate your input. I haven’t come across areas where ChatGPT refuses a right-leaning answer about a nuanced topic.

I see far more instances from posters who are unhappy that ChatGPT won’t say something negative about women/POC/LGBT people, but will about men/white/straight, etc.

Personally, I don’t mind that ChatGPT is protective of systematically oppressed groups.

I have yet to see an example where it convincingly leans left on any sort of nuanced argument. If you or anyone else would be able to post an example, I think it would be an interesting addition to the discussion!
I might be a counterexample to the claim that "this is pedantic and the differences they're mentioning are meaningless in practice". I learned about functors in uni and only later took a look at Haskell. I was genuinely very confused by the naming of Functor: functors map both morphisms and elements, but this isn't the case in Haskell. So I was left wondering whether I had missed something.
Haskell feels like a language that's full of great ideas but overall nobody really likes it. Maybe it just needs to simmer for 30 years until someone comes up with whatever Haskell's equivalent of C++'s Rust is.
My preference is simply down to he act of lying increasing my cognitive load to engage with others. If I choose not to tell someone something, that's relatively easy. If I tell them something artificial, I have to maintain and harmonize that falsehood for the duration of the interaction.

Yes, I have a Blind account. In that context, I have a handle, but I resolutely refuse to knowingly say anything untrue. It's just too much work to be bothered.
> I think it's going to be harder for academic researchers to get institutional approval to scrape adversarially

This is a good point about what might happen, but it seems worthwhile to address and fix directly. Personally I don't see why adversarial scraping of a publicly published website should require any more ethical consideration/review than using the suggested API would. Ethical concerns should revolve around humans, not the business desires of non-human entities.
Neil Gaiman changed Kaya from Ashitaka's romantic partner to younger sister. He also inserted a fart joke into a moment that didn't deserve it.

The dub is above average, but the original with subs is the best way to watch the film.

Mononoke Hime is still in my top 25 films. If you haven't seen it, please treat yourself. I think it's far better than Sen to Chihiro / Spirited Away.

(FWIW, I bought the domain for Miramax's original marketing page and kept it online: http://princess-mononoke.com)
This is an aside, but although I agree that groups without formal power structures can hide real ones, I'm not sure explicit hierarchies are necessarily better. In my experience, they can be used to legitimize shadow hierarchies or corruption, which sometimes makes the problems worse. Those vague power structures exist with or without formal ones; when they coincide it's good, but when they don't, it can perpetuate or reinforce problems more than they might otherwise.

I'm not trying to defend anything about EA, though. It's always seemed somewhat suspicious to me, and there's probably a lot of ways in which it could be used as an example of phenomena that occur more broadly in society.
probably a combination of becoming the worlds industrial hegemon immediately after ww2 while the suddenly facing down communism. industrial jobs were well compensated the rest to the world was buying from us because ww2 bombing destroyed everyone else industrial base so there was money to spend, and socialism looked to much like the Soviets to the average American. then in the fallowing decades American labor unions became infiltrated and taken over by the mob (remember Jimmy Hoffa). the combine association of communism and organized crime gave it a bad smell the much of America.
Bad mental arithmetic on me!

I knew it changed right around 1995 or 96, though.
and every single British prime minister since Thatcher went to boarding school

Hmm, it doesn't invalidate your overall point but I would guess John Major, Gordon Brown, Teresa May and Liz Truss were probably not at boarding school.
Let me share my learnings on this with you…
Data is available for at least the first three of those (reddit isn't "officially" available but there are 3rd party dumps).

Why not load it into OpenSearch or some such?
> Nearly any single frame from nearly any of the films would make gorgeous wall art.

Studio Ghibli provides hundreds of stills for their movies on their website:

https://www.ghibli.jp/info/013409/
Seriously working on the default/built in sorting implementation must suck. You can make the theoretically optimal choice, but get utterly hosed because in practice you get the “wrong” distribution of input data.

I recognize that in practice vs in theory is often an issue and have had to deal with it myself in the past, but seriously sorting seems specifically awful to deal with.
The marketing is amazing but not sure if it resonates strongly with the actual product. I was imaging some personal goalkeeping/notetaking app, not Jira 2.0
> What are the symptoms of elevated CO2 levels? Why can't you feel them and need a monitor to tell you you are unwell?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide#Below_1%

The most convincing evidence is from the ISS: at 5000ppm CO2, the crew experienced "headaches, lethargy, mental slowness, emotional irritation, and sleep disruption." - so you can feel too high a CO2 level and open a window (if you know to consider that as a problem which causes these symptoms).

The studies suggesting 1000ppm may be harmful are called out in the wiki article and it seems the jury is still out as to if the effects are real/are the result of CO2 and not confounding issues.
Keep in mind that one of the things SSD firmware does is deliberately write-lock the drive if the media is too worn to erase. So buggy firmware overestimating media wear is also likely to cause a failed drive.
> Could I capture all these sorts' inputs to generate My Real-Life Sorting Corpus of One Day's Worth of Data?

You could wrap the lib containing the sort function and write the input to some file.

It is easy of it is C at least.
> If you want a stable pension alongside an often decades long retirement, then start saving when you're young or have a lot of children to support you.

I just want to point out that you're largely proving my point. I got started on saving later in my career because the first few years were spent laboring under the idea that pensions existed. (The 401k was rolled out after I got my first job, for example.)

We had the rug pulled, and there are a lot of GenX people who are going to be in a lot worse situation than me, someone who was lucky enough to get into a high-paying career and stay there (that is, I've never been laid off..so far) and deliberately did not have many children or take vacations or have lucked into not getting sick.

We are both in the same boat; you just have the "advantage", useless for anything it is, of never having thought you were on land.
https://archive.org/details/2762087R.nlm.nih.gov
they just raise the price or keep the new price high for the next generation until they have most of the old supply out of the pipeline - this is what they've been doing with zen3.
> Until 2020, when the new H5N1 strain began to spread extensively among wild birds, most big outbreaks occurred among poultry. But now, with wild birds acting as conduits, it’s not just the biggest outbreak ever among poultry, causing the death of at least 150 million animals so far, but it is also steadily expanding its reach, including to mammal species like dolphins and bears.

H5N1 is buying up lots of lottery tickets.
Personally, I have no problem not being anonymous online. But I do prefer to have privacy online.

Some folks conflate them, but while they are related, they are not the same thing.

Sites like HN provide privacy through pseudonymity (which is, essentially, the "solution" prescribed by the author of the blog post), allowing those I interact with here to know that "I" am "Nobody9999".

Unsurprisingly, that's not the name on my passport. But on HN, you can be relatively sure (assuming I'm not also operating sock-puppet accounts as well) that my thoughts, ideas and expression are from the same person.

I preserve my privacy by not using my "legal" name here. The combination allows me to freely express myself without being tracked down, doxxed or otherwise abused by those who might disagree with me.

As for other places on the internet, I generally don't utilize sites that require verification of my personal details (an excellent example is ChatGPT, which requires not only an account, phone number verification as well), not because I'm engaged in evil/illegal/nasty behaviors, but because my business is my business and no one else's.

That's at least an attempt at preserving some semblance of privacy, but doesn't really provide anonymity.

While (as others have mentioned), my electricity provider, my landlord, my ISP, my mobile device service provider and my doctor all know who I am, where I live and an astonishing amount of information about my life, for the most part that's necessary to participating economically in society.

As such, especially given the lengths to which ISPs and mobile service providers go to to collect information about my activities, my privacy is significantly curtailed. That generally pisses me off, not because I really have anything to hide, but because (and I'll say it again), my business is my business and no one else's.

while I do understand the blog author's point of view, rather than creating an alternative persona online, I'm just me and mostly share my thoughts pseudonymously without trying to create an alternative backstory for those pseudonymous identities.

However, those who choose to use online resources that require verification of their identity, may need to take additional steps to preserve their privacy/pseudonymity. I choose not to engage in those forums and, as such, my privacy is improved a little.

Is that sufficient for me? No. Unfortunately, there's a limit to what I can do while still living "on the grid." And since I have no interest in squatting in a lean-to deep in the woods, I do have to give up some privacy.

I'd love to live in a world where collection of PII was the exception rather than the rule, but those my countrymen (with a very few exceptions) elect to legislate and execute such laws as are legislated don't seem to give a rat's ass about privacy, unless theirs is impacted.

And more's the pity.

Edit: Fixed typo.
I recommend Axum.

1) Not too high, not too low.

2) Very well componentized (e.g., Tower for middleware)

3) Very well modelized and complete (e.g., middleware, extractor, req/res extension, fallback, req/res mappers, simple and flexible response/error scheme)

4) Part of the Tokio umbrella.

5) Great user momentum and well-maintained.
I've posted this before, but using it as a coding partner reminds me of this scene (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaUuE582vq8) from TNG (Geordi solves a problem on the holodeck).
Speaking of movie quotes.

From Good Will Hunting

"Wood drastically underestimates the impact of social distinctions predicated upon wealth, especially inherited wealth"? You got that from Vickers' "Work in Essex County," page 98, right? Yeah, I read that too. Were you gonna plagiarize the whole thing for us? Do you have any thoughts of your own on this matter? Or do you, is that your thing, you come into a bar, read some obscure passage and then pretend - you pawn it off as your own, as your own idea just to impress some girls, embarrass my friend?"
IMO there’s a version of the problem that’s very solvable: define the mapping between physical and conscious states.

In particular: is it one-to-one (panpsychism)? Many-to-one (materialism)? One-to-many (idealism)?

We’re already finding course-grained mappings via neuroscience. All we need to do is iterate.

This won’t tell us anything about the ontological nature of the mapping, any more than General Relativity tells us about the ontological nature of spacetime. But we’d be able to make and validate predictions.
potentially, the air volume of a room hugely affects how often you have to air the room (but can also making the airing take longer depending on window size, arrangement, wind, etc.)

one of the reasons some people swear on living in houses build around 1900 where I live, the larger ceiling height adds air volume (there are other reasons like large windows, wooden floors, etc.).
I don't think its not complete, it just doesn't always apply to every situation. Thats why there are other belief systems like Deontology[1] which I tend to gravitate towards the most. Utilitarianism has plenty of issues. Doing whats right for everyone, doesn't always yield the best results for society. Sometimes you need to do whats right for the few because the masses doesn't always understand the long ranging ramifications of decisions based off this belief.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deontology)