skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm glad you included that last line. I agree with you that managing a remote team or running a remote business has challenges that an in-person one doesn't. (I've been running AutoTempest with an all-remote team for almost 14 years now.) Managers who rely on the 'butts in seats' heuristic will struggle a lot with managing remote employees.

However, the opportunities are also massive. For one thing, the owners/managers get to work from home too, which I certainly wouldn't give up! You can also hire from anywhere, which is huge in terms of finding talented people. Most importantly though, I think, all the things you need to do to manage a remote team effectively are things you really should be doing anyway. Yes, maybe some of the communication would be face to face instead of Slack or whatever, but for the most part if you're managing well, it's not going to be too hard to translate that to a remote environment. It's about actually knowing what people are working on, not just making sure they're putting in the hours. Knowing the goals of the team, and the individual goals of the team members. Fostering communication and collaboration (whatever the medium). And then continuously reviewing and refining the processes by which you do all those things.
The article doesn't actually substantiate the claim that the cuts are being made to maintain the dividend. The article does claim, through unnamed sources, that the pay cuts are real.

But if history is any guide, the dividend cuts are also coming.

The current yield is over 5%, which is higher than any duration of US Treasury. This should be a pretty low bar, but over the last 30 years isn't. When company dividend yields approach this threshold, something often gives.

https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/intc/dividend-...

It's also worth noting that as late as a few weeks ago there were several articles swearing up and down that there's no way Intel will cut its dividend. That's looking more ridiculous by the day.
Intel already had layoffs - it's almost periodic at this point.
Sore throats, fevers, rashes, allergic reactions, sprains, ear congestion, that kind of thing. Most people go to their PCP for these things, and urgent care is perfectly good at doing first line care for all of them; in fact, I've gotten more extensive care at the urgent care clinic than I ever have from a PCP.

I won't go to urgent care for a physical.
why should I care if city restaurants and hair dressers get my money? There are local restaurants and hair dressers in my small town "satellite" city that need the work as well.
Exactly.

Here is another example where a comment can help.

// Do does x, y, and z, in that order.
func Do(x, y, z func()) {
x()
z()
y()
}

Sometimes, as here, the comment correctly describes what the code should do. But the implementation does not agree with the comment. Relying on the comment, a developer can confidently fix the bug, or, at least, notice a discrepancy between the intentions, as described by the comments, and reality, as implemented by the lines of code. This is particularly important in complex code. Think: HTTP keep-alive handling, in which many factors, with varying priorities, have to be taken into account (e.g. client hint in the request header, current server load, overall server configuration, per handler configuration).
It is not possible, but it is the future, you already have a glimpse with chatgpt creating sql for you. Now that is real, 100% declarative SQL, no debate on that, as everything will be some-when in the future.

You are describe here the abstraction you create on a primitive (related to the system you design) system, and introduce ideas like "employee" "unions" etc If you do good job, when you programming you combine generic purpose systems and introducing new ideas in a way that another human can understand (words), but in certain way you "made the computer system understand" those things too. That's your job. So basically you teach SQL server that a union employee is a thing with the dbo.IsEmployeeUnion function.

In case of html you are not introducing new things. You actually can, because the browser is really flexible (like i make a non-functional quasi elements a lot, to make the html code itself more understandable), but HTML is not designed for you to introduce new elements/ideas (originally, nowadays kinda with CSS). Anyways this is how you see the difference in another way.

I try to tell all of you how the technical details, the implementation does not matter, only just the language itself, when we speak about paradigms, but it seems i'm failing.

By the way, i think training AI models does not fit to any of the paradigms we have here, it's gonna be (or it is?) a new way to solve problems, and that also has nothing to do with files, or any kind of implementation. The important is what you see on the screen, and what you do.
That sucks. I usually try to buy parts from Newegg even if it costs a little more than Amazon because of their stance on patent trolls. When I got a bad gpu from them in 2012, the RMA experience was easy. I wonder what went wrong.
I don't pretend to know anything about the intricacies of consumer behavior or service pricing, but I think it would be interesting to see what would happen with a different model. Instead of offering an ad supported free tier, you could have a free tier without ads, but other limitations like only shuffle, a time limit each day, no brand new releases, or similar. Then the no ads thing can be a benefit to other ad supported services, but if you want to listen to music all day you have to pay for premium.

I'm sure smarter people than me have found this model worse than what's already used, I just hate ads and was surprised at the low value they seem to generate. And all those ad-supported users must generate plenty of streams that means payments to the record companies.
Yep. First place I worked, they did some layoffs. After that, some of the best people started trickling out.
If you're in a major metro, they're likely as available as your PCP, if not more so; your PCP is probably affiliated with a chain of them.
It why would GitHub care to build functionality to behave how companies who aren’t paying them want it to behave?
Your statement is a non-sequitur.
The only artists that benefit from Spotify are the top of the top, as in Beyoncé/Lady Gaga level.

I always suspected that the falloff is pretty steep as soon as you step away from let's say the top n artists at a time.

This confirms this suspicion again.

I'd go as far as say that piracy is much better for artists due to the lack of dark patterns (which funnel more people to fewer artists). And once you visit a show or buy a piece of merch you have given an artist more money than Spotify listening alone ever would have, and it is not even close.
I confess I wasn't too excited about this stuff. It has advanced faster than I was expecting, though. Looking forward to playing with it, now. Kudos to all involved!
I invested when they announced their ARC GPUs at the height of the chip shortage. Took them so long to deliver it seems like they lost their chance.
Reading the article, it doesn't look easy at all.

With the [..] proposal, it is easy enough to convert it back and forth between pointers and [..] to conform to required interfaces. One could even make the [..] implicitly convertible to a pointer.
> None of these Android clients would garner any attention at all on iOS

Probably because these are open source? iOS developers won't get out of bed to write something unless it's worth their 70%.

> Everything feels like a hobby app because everything is.

My guy, when people tried taking commercially viable Twitter clients seriously, look at what happened.
I think very little of nimbyism life looks like that. People don't want change by them
Thinking in terms of quarters rather than years or even decades.
Loss of Epigenetic Information as a Cause of Mammalian Aging
To help with discovery of new RSS feeds I use this mechanism for https://linklonk.com - when you upvote or submit a link, you connect (subscribe) to all users that upvoted and to all RSS feeds that posted that link.

For example, if you submit this link: https://stratechery.com/2023/netflixs-new-chapter/ then you will get connected to two RSS feeds that posted that link:
https://stratechery.com/feed/ and https://hnrss.org/newest?points=100 (ie, the HN feed of items with >100 points)

As you rate content you get connected to more and more sources.

The way it solves the oversubscription problem is - whenever a user/feed posts something - your connection to them goes down slightly. As a result you see content from sources with the highest signal-to-noise ratio first.

The differences from Artifact is:

- Artifact uses implicit signals such as read time; LinkLonk uses your explicit upvotes. I think implicit signals are fine for entertainment content, but not for informational content. Time spent is not equal to becoming better informed. I think only you can be a judge of that.

- Artifact uses an opaque AI algorithm optimized to do what they want; LinkLonk uses a transparent algorithm, where each recommendation comes from a feed or a user that you have co-liked items in common.
In the USA, many “revival” style homes were built in the 19th and early 20th century. It wouldn’t be uncommon to find a Victorian next to a Georgian next to a Tutor. But they are just styles.
Tbf I don't think C copies the whole flexible array member either[0]. So the care you would normally take while using a flexible array member in C should also be taken in C++ :)

[0]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35423293/flexible-array-...
My reading of this is: "I agree with what you said but I'm still not happy with how they manage things and also they shouldn't call their language Go".
https://java.base/java/util/package-summary.html#Collections...
Precision is impossible to calculate without knowing P(AI), which is use-case specific.

Source: Spent 10 years trying to explain this to government people who insisted that someone tell them Precision based purely on the classifier accuracy without considering usage.
> yes, it can be implemented as a pointer at the end of the struct, but the extra latency of another pointer chasing can reduce performance

For the latency to be significant digits, there must be a lot of repeated calls which only read/write a very small number of elements in the array. Otherwise the accumulation of read/write operations performed when iterating over the data would dwarf the single pointer dereference.

So I'm curious now-- do OS kernels spend most of their time doing lots of calls that dive into such dynamically-allocated data just to extract a single datum or two?
It seems that the same people who are trying to politicize what economy would benefit from restricting remote work are the same population benefitting from keeping the federal minimum wage at $7.25 for the last 15 years.

It’s sure to only benefit a select few. We should let the free market decide what we collectively value in cities. With remote work in particular, it feels like there is more value placed on the standards of humanity than being close to a “hub” to make larger sums of money. For me, I love great weather and not spending a tenth of my day in traffic.
I just added `rtx install --all` which installs all plugins and all runtimes. It's in v1.3.0
It's also completely wrong to suggest that OSU is motivated by the same incentives as Amazon.

If anything the equivalent bullshit to paying a football coach that much would not fly at a for profit.
The line-of-business software is quickly turning into a web browser accessing an internal server cluster, and just about any chip can run that nowadays.
Heh. Well, methinks your idea and mine as to what constitutes a small town are somewhat different. The small town (pop.~1500 at the time) canceled pre-calc my senior year; the district contacted, individually, the 3 of us that had enrolled. Something about being the only person who had enrolled, so they couldn't justify a regularly scheduled class. I guess they might have thought that nerds didn't talk to each other. While I don't doubt there are many non-mega-urban environments that fit your descriptions, the number of small (wee?) towns that might lay claim to such a tax would kill such a program in its crib.
https://support.google.com/maps/answer/6258979?hl=sk&dark=1
I can't think of a program more dangerous than one which intercepts and has option to receives every byte read from the filesystem -- while also having its own arbitrary network access ... the idea that employing such a tool could ever be better than _not_ having that tool is wrong at such a fundamental level that I don't understand how our computing society allows it to go on ...
I looked it up, and it's actually more like 80%
That's another reason that people are frustrated with Central planning. Your community might have a very strong opinion, but they're not willing to pay for it. This means that they will settle for making it illegal.
Depends on the level of information available to voters. At the local level, decisions are usually terrible, as getting info about local elections is usually contained within patronage networks.

At the state level, elections are much better, and state level elections are usually far more informed. There have been moments of pure greed by the electorate, like with Prop 13, that have severely harmed the state, but that's a common trap with all electorates.

Overall I think California voters are newer on par with places like Minnesota thag have generally very good governance.
I think it’s cool watching giant companies fumble over and over strategically but see comments applauding cutting workers. Why would you trust their wisdom on this decision? So weird how this country admires the most dogshit performing executives
I haven't used tail scale, but I'm confused.
I thought wireguard had a simple config where you can just place a range of IPs and it basically just sends anything to those IPs over wg - effectively split tunneling.

So why couldn't you just have a different range for another subnet? Is it just because tail scale made everything needlessly complex? Or is it a base wireguard problem?
“I think you should consider more than your own happiness, we're talking about the economy”

Did I misinterpret this?
I used to find elementary OS extremely good looking a few years ago, now it just looks bad to me. I guess I'm used to all the modern ui designs I see out there.
I'm going to disagree with you there. It's a convention that comments refer to the following lines of code, not above. Reading from top to bottom or bottom to top has nothing to do with this. A better way IMO is to disambiguate what specifically "this" refers to in the comment.
Considering how few features Dropbox hosts, I find that incredibly hard to believe.
There are 2.5 million developers in the US. Most of them don’t live in tech hubs. Most of them work for hospitals, insurance companies, state and local government, etc.
Density of jobs is not a problem, it's a fundamental property and network effects are real.

The problem is people that want to stop other people from being able to live the way they want.
Ask HN: How do you test a collaborative Editor?
We have built a collaborative editor using tiptap(https://tiptap.dev/). We want to test 2 imp things

1) We are not loosing any data when multiple users are using the same editor simultaneously.
2) How many concurrent users using the editor can our current system support.
This is just speculation on my part, but I've wondered if it's because of listening patterns: I tend to listen to entire albums at once and did most of my discovery on Spotify by starting "radios" from songs or albums. Spotify would then rabbithole me on those even when refreshed; they'd slowly converge on the same set of songs, unless I moved to a completely different genre (and even then I'd sometimes end up with playlists with all kinds of discordant stuff mashed together).

I got fed up when I looked up while working and realized that I had listened to Circles by Dag Nasty[1] like 8 times in a single day. I used to like that song, but now I can't listen to it anymore!

I've switched to Last.fm, Bandcamp, and my friends (bless them) for discovery.

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vyx4JeyMJE0
Discover, artist radio, auto-playlists after playing a single song, etc. Pretty much everything in the app is a terrible recommendation.
Intel Slashes CEO Pay by 25% as Part of Companywide Cuts
"All employees below Principal Engineer, grades 7 to 11, will get a 5% cut, 10% cuts will be instituted for VPs, and the executive leadership team will take a 15% cut, with Pat Gelsinger taking a 25% cut. "

So the OP would rather have Intel fire thousands of employees?
This just isn't true. I've been working from home close to a decade and it has been fantastic for me. There are clearly workers who do better, and prefer an office environment. We are social creatures after all. There are plenty of people who are miserable at home - they don't have the space for a proper office, they can't "turn off" at the end of the day, they are lonely, face to face interactions boost their creativity, etc.
> Why "wipe" them? That seems unnecessarily punative.

You're proposing to remove the devices from the cloud management service, probably including admin lockouts and anti-malware software, but leaving all the data on them?
Surveillance and the Loneliness of the Long-Distance Trucker
ChatGPT trying to convert hexadecimal to an int
It's interesting how the formulas for the conversion are correct, but the result keeps being missed.
Archived: https://archive.ph/65NlT
Nice work and cool example of a one-shot prompt https://github.com/varunshenoy/GraphGPT/blob/main/public/pro...
I use to love working with Stripe, but it turned from being an asset to a liability. Far too risky to have my payments infra stuck behind a company that will arbitrarily cut you off with no support, or worse, actively use "terms" and "our policy" to not support you

I moved all my clients off Stripe as a precautionary measure, and now in the process of moving our last Stripe account with 100+ Stripe Connect accounts away. It eventually just got to be comical how infuriating their ability to dodge responsibility became, or even just simply being helpful; i.e. "we can't unblock those payments or that account, it's just our policy because x,y, and z", or "we can't tell you what your transaction threshold is, or where you are at in it, and we can't increase it, or let you check via the API". IF YOU CAN'T DO ANY OF THAT FOR ME, WHY AM I PAYING YOU AND WHO DID YOU BUILD YOUR SYSTEM FOR? Answer: not you or me.

Stripe is a great way to get something quick and dirty off the ground, but you better have a plan or timeline from day one for replacing it.

Treat it like eating McDonalds. It's fine as a one-off to get you through a hard time, but as soon as you depend on it, you'll be in a world of hurt with no one else to blame.
"you are not authorized to play this song"

I get this probably 25% of the times I try to play any song at all.

On my iPhone 14 pro.
I reached the same conclusion but from a different angle: if remote work is bad for the economy, but good for the people who enjoy it, how many other aspects of serving “the economy” are in conflict with serving the people who participate in it? Maybe it’s the economy itself that’s bad. Maybe looking for ways to balance changes like remote work with a bad economic system isn’t nearly ambitious enough.

Maybe labor that needs induced demand shouldn’t shape society at all. Maybe it’s arbitrary makework—maybe the laborers, and the society making arbitrary work, would both benefit more by supporting those humans who’d otherwise do makework.
People go to lunch at work. I went to the barber. I am salaried and not paid by the hour and am measured by my performance. I see no problem with getting your hair cut at work. In fact at Goldman Sachs they have a barber in the building the CEO goes to.
I can memorize your patented design too. Doesn't make it less illegal for me recreate it from memory.
iTelegram
The new things that become popular aren't strictly better than the things they replace. In many cases, it seems like the newness factor that makes it popular to people at all
It’s just a text completion model. It doesn’t actually evaluate computations, despite it being common to find it giving correct answers for some computation queries
Not true from the anecdotes, and admittedly just anecdotes, that I've seen. Top performers get some token, Approved by Legal™, <2% cut to avoid it being classified as a low performer firing, with a larger but still proportional percent coming from middle performers, and the the vast majority of the layoff percent consisting of low performers.
It's going to falsely label any recent innovation in language as generated, because the training set will skew human-written as old and GPT generated as new language.
From the headline I would infer OP would rather Intel cut their dividend.
But the Quest 2 is a platform that can grow. It's like they're trying to raise an artistic child to grow up to be a lawyer. The Quest 2 and gaming isn't success in their eyes.
Would love to have a law that the minimum wage for people whose services you use, whether that person lives close or far, must be enough to pay for the mortgage at, say, 40th percentile of a studio in the area. Want that receptionist at the doctor to make an appointment for you? Want somebody to restock the shelves at the grocery store? Better pay up... Want to go to a doctor's office that has a janitorial service? Better expect those janitors to get paid.

We have an entire generation of extremely over privileged, overly entitled, and narcissistic people setting housing policy that seemingly have no idea about all the labor that makes all their lives possible. We are reaching "let them eat cake" levels of self-deception from homeowners.
If the organization is so large that it needs even the tracking group to have its own internal hierarchy then I'm afraid my wisdom is lacking.
You're changing the goal posts from what I said. I merely said understanding; you've decided this means "deep understanding," whatever that is.

I don't appreciate gaslighting, so I'll be withdrawing from this conversation and you're free to continue your fantasy about ML taking over the world, like VR, blockchain, and big data before it.
Maybe the small businesses you've encountered are different from the ones I have? My expectation is that most have no security staff and wouldn't use this feature even if it had indefinite retention.
Contiki has always amazed me. One of my future projects has porting it to some random old system I like and expanding the functionality on it. Maybe even I retire. sigh
I do?

Usually have a haircut either 8:30 or 9:30 am, and it’s just a few blocks walk from the office.
Agreed on FB but TT is another thing altogether. I guess Quality matters.
I like this technique. You could also take a ChatGPT essay and have the students rewrite it or analyze for style.

Or have a session on how to write the prompts to generate the good stuff. In the hands of a skilled liberal artist, the models produce amazing results.

Yes the tool is powerful, but it still requires skills, knowledge and an ascetic voice.
They were funded by a separate tax that everyone had to pay which got discontinued recently.
I'm not the original commenter, but I do live in Boston.

Could give a lot of anecdotal stories, but here's the stat -- Boston is the 3rd worst in the nation for auto accidents.

https://dailyinfographic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Citi...
Yes let's end commutes by letting people live close to where their labor is needed.
No because I would never do that. If my choices were work in Santa Monica and drive 2-3 hours a day or live in Ohio, I would live in Ohio.
You can do this with a persistent cookie. Of course the saved data won't transfer from device to device without a login. But username/password is sufficient for that so long as you don't allow freeform discussion. If you allow any kind of anonymous discussion then you've just created a new 4chan.