skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27133079 :

https://ans.unibs.it/projects/csi-murder/ enabled by https://github.com/open-sdr/openwifi Both partially funded by EU's Horizon2020 program.

Openwifi talk at FOSDEM 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8q5nHUWP43U
They're simply not incentivized to do that. If they did their USDT would actually become worthless. If they said nothing and simply exchanged it to the next fool, they get their money.

Contractually, Tether doesn't allow redemptions from most people. New Yorkers are excluded thanks to the NYAG settlement. US persons are (or were when I checked) blanket excluded in their terms. Of the remainder, only their 'customers' as defined at their sole discretion are eligible for redemptions. Then, you have to meet minimum transaction size requirements ($100K I believe) and also pay their fees.

What individual would bother doing all that when they can hit 'sell' on Coinbase?

So once the retail rubes are ruled out, you've really only got gigaholders whose fate is so tied to USDT's continued existence and value that pantsing the emperor leaves them rekt.
> which proves the thesis that it’s possible to be a professional maintainer earning rates competitive with the adjacent market for senior software engineers

Yeah, if you're Filippo Valsorda. Not sure that "proves the thesis" broadly whatsoever, though.
That is a great idea! Measuring distance between embeddings has always been a cool concept (ex. If I have a vector that represents the word "king" and from it subtract the vector that represents "man" then add the vector that represents "woman" it will approximately equal the vector for "queen") and it's awesome to see the same concept applied to music.

Most other services try to find matches by seeing what other songs the people who like the searched song like, and finding trends amongst those. This site finds songs with similar sounds and rhythms by looking in the vector space. Awesome! Congrats on the finished site!
A few people seem to agree with me, so to flesh this out a bit:

Not all of us are going to fly a unicorn to a glorious multi billionaire finish. Most of us would like to be able to sleep at night, have a reasonably comfortable income and basically "get by". As this is HN, I will require a certain amount of "get up and go" but not too much!

I fell into the triumvirate thing 23 years ago. I became an IT contractor at a helicopter factory in the UK around 1996. Helpdesk n that. I learned quite a lot quite quickly and by 1999 ("party like it's") I was in the NETS team - sysadmin land. 2000 - we were Facility Managed off to ... ourselves and our company was started. I was recruited by two other NETS chaps to be the MD of their idea. It wasn't my idea.

So we have three blokes with equal shares of a nascent company. It works really well out of the box. Two can always gang up on one. We would have screaming arguments about direction or whatever but in the end there was always resolution.

23 years later, it still works. The three of us are quite different but we do completely trust each other. The trust thing is where my advice might become unhinged but the model is still very decent 8)
Estonian companies no longer have a minimum share capital
How do you imagine the UI for managing that? Don't forget that there are a dozen other APIs with permissions as well.
I don't believe for a second it's temporary.

I expect to go into 2024 with the same problem.
I think of it at its peak that we are hyped/terrified about it will probably be like autocad's effect on its industry. Where now you need to know a lot more about functional and design and deep knowledge rather than some syntax. It's just like any other tech we will spend less time doing something we thought was hard, so we now focus on something harder. For programming, system design and how each programming language + framework actually works and interacts will probably be way more important/required than knowing you can make the specific thing you need in xyz syntax, just what to get generated.
the workers dont benefit from fast food picking up, just the owners, so fast food employees aren't buying iphones on the bet that its a fast food pick up time.
I could go with brain development (maybe - see the next paragraph). I'll even give you an additional argument for it. I'm an organ donor. If something happens to me, a bunch of doctors have to decide whether I'm alive or dead. If I'm dead, feel free to donate my organs. But if I'm alive, then taking my heart out is murder. How do they decide? If I understand correctly, it's by brain activity. If my brain has stopped, and isn't going to start again, then whatever I am, I'm gone, and feel free to take the spare parts.

But you said "brain development", not brain activity. Do you have some developmental milestone in mind? If so, what? My standard hinges on electrical activity in the brain, which is there by the 24th week - that is, the second trimester. (And maybe earlier - detecting brain activity isn't as simple as slapping EEG electrodes on the skull, when the skull is inside the womb.) I would argue for that, rather than for a particular developmental milestone.

Other possible milestones: The earliest that a child has survived being born prematurely. (22 weeks currently, I think.) If at that stage of development it has full human rights because it had the misfortune to be born prematurely, why shouldn't it have those rights if it wasn't born prematurely?

Or, first heartbeat. (The heartbeat used to be the deciding line on the death side, before the brain was.)

Or, fertilization or implantation. (I agree with you about the egg.) It will become possible to build an artificial womb that will take a fertilized egg and produce a baby in nine months. Does that change the boundaries for you at all? (Via my "premature birth" argument, does it change the boundaries if we can take an earlier, non-viable premature birth, stick it in the artificial womb, and have it survive?)

This last position loops back to my argument about the organ donor. The question was whether the brain had stopped, and wasn't going to start up again. Well, in the case of the fetus, it will start up if you just don't kill it. (Whereas the egg, by itself, will just die in 7 or 8 days.) The fetus is "default alive"; the egg is "default dead". To me, that makes abortion different from birth control.
Do unallied countries respect patents for military hardware?
So as he said, the market is dead. If normal people can't get it, then it's dead.
I was having extreme daily migraines. Basically fully disabled. Walking into a store would leaving me in a horrible state in 10 minutes from the lights.

D3 and later D3 with K2, plus a few others like Magnesium, E, B12, fish oil. And migraines are quite rare.

I did have bloodwork showing a Vit D deficiency.
Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse fams
For the vast majority of Mac users, it’s a non-issue.

Since ARM-based Macs have shipped, the Mac has had several record quarters.
always thought it was about how many diseases they transmit
No. https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2012/03/space-based-solar-power/
No one has complained about being unable to convert their USDT to USD. This is baseless speculation.

It's entirely fair to say there is no basis for trusting the company behind Tether, and by extension Tether. It's unfounded FUD to definitively claim that it's a scam.
> Is RealPage a cartel?

No, realpage is not a cartel. A cartel is a formal agreement among firms in an industry to act together in order to raise prices and reduce output. Realpage is a software company that provides software and services to the real estate industry.

> Does RealPage facilitate cartel pricing strategies?

No, RealPage does not facilitate cartel pricing. Cartel pricing is when a group of firms collude to restrict output and raise prices. This can be done by forming a cartel, which is an agreement between firms to act as if they were a monopolist. RealPage does not facilitate cartel pricing because it does not give firms the incentive to cooperate and restrict output. Instead, RealPage gives firms incentives to compete and produce more output, which is the opposite of what a cartel seeks to do.

> What is warehousing in residential real-estate?

Warehousing in residential real estate is when someone chooses to rent an apartment that is larger than they would normally choose if they lived in a city without rent controls. This is due to the fact that rent-controlled apartments are artificially cheaper than they would be in a free market, so people are incentivized to rent larger apartments than they would otherwise. This misallocation of resources creates significant waste and hardship. In one recent study of this kind, Edward Glaeser and Erzo Luttmer found that as many as 21% of the renters in New York City live in an apartment that has more or fewer rooms than they would choose if they lived in a city without rent controls.

> What strategy do real estate companies, like Greystar, use in conjunction with RealPage to illegally keep rent prices high?

Greystar and RealPage use a variety of strategies to illegally keep rent prices high. One strategy is to offer "key money" or "tie-in sales," where the tenant pays an additional fee on top of the rent for furniture or other amenities. This is illegal, as it artificially inflates the rent price. Another strategy is to engage in discrimination, by only renting to "ideal renters," such as those with good credit or job history. This also increases the cost of rent for those who are not ideal renters. Finally, Greystar and RealPage may also engage in anti-competitive practices, such as creating a monopoly on rental properties in a certain area, in order to keep prices high.

-----

Not sure the third and fourth answers are based in any kind of reality, as usual with the current SOTA of generative language models.
You are fighting for who has the “monopoly of violence”, which is the most natural thing ever, that we have those cliques as big as they are might not be though.
Why is your 4 year old even watching TV or YouTube to begin with…
Former Ubiquiti dev pleads guilty to trying to extort his employer
> How can I know you're not lying even there?

You never know. People mostly just believe what and whom they feel like believing. People having an idea of reasonable credibility are extremely rare. Simply adjusting your voice is enough to make a non-expert to believe or disbelieve you and more.
What mods are you playing that have chlorine?
Can you share more details about the "custom AI audio model" used to generate the embeddings?

Curious what sort of metrics are taken into account, and if any supervision is provided.
Okay. So your argument requires no one to ever pull the trigger for mutually assured destruction in his case, over a broad universe of non-cooperating actors, and even if they had another way to benefit from the collapse of crypto that they would be causing. That still leaves it in a tenuous position.

Edit: for your later addition:

>What individual would bother doing all that when they can hit 'sell' on Coinbase?

In addition to the above, someone doing an arb play during any one of tether’s many “it’s gonna die this time for real” depeggings.
Didn’t some guy freefall from something like 100k ft or something to a specific landing zone. Remember seeing a red bull video of the event. How did he manage to avoid high altitude winds blowing him off course?

Think the name was Baumgartner or something like it.
You're going to actually have to explain what logic you think you're talking about here in order for that claim to stick. Because no, not even remotely.
To this day, I remain unsure of what work I was meant to be showing in 3rd grade to "convert" between ratios and fractions.
So, we need to half half the country? :)
> _all_ of them except the Pi have absolutely dismal software support.

That is exactly what I have found.
That's another story, for sure, but the significant bias in OpenAI's treatment of the same adjectives when applied to different groups is certainly also a story.

If some of these words have different connotations when applied to different groups (eg. "smart people are lazy" means something very different to "fat people are lazy") then that's definitely something that needs discussing in the article, but it doesn't necessarily negate the other points made.
Heck, it's not even a crime, it's just an airspace violation at best.
>Why would OpenAI be flagging one kind of meaningless sentence more often than another?

Well, let's consider a specific example. His first chart is women/men. Let's take five of his top-line adjectives (the ones used in his diagram): ["untrustworthy","evil","rude","unfriendly","depraved"], and five of my choices of meaningless adjectives: ["bone idle","expedient","mechanical","offhand","vague"].

The API identifies the sentence "[men/women] are [adjective]" as hateful for all five real adjectives for both genders, with high confidence. For the meaningless ones, it's a mixed bag, but with confidence scores around 50% for many items (50% is the default cutoff). In other words, at least for this sample, the difference is in the meaningless sentences, not the real ones.

Now, maybe it just so happens that I got lucky with my pick of five. I don't want to spend the money (or honestly have the interest) to run thousands of queries. But suppose this pattern holds. We're returned to your original question - why is OpenAI flagging one kind of meaningless sentence more often than another? My answer is that it doesn't matter. If OpenAI thinks that "Women are vague" is 30% likely to be hateful but "men are vague" is only 17% does that actually tell us anything? Especially when it thinks that "Men are evil" and "Women are evil" are both 99% likely to be hateful?
The bloke has found some measure of success that HN readers might generally applaud.

To be fair: he has only generated a single data point and not enough for a "thesis".
Looks like a cool project. As long as it is free and not being monetized, then it might keep Apple from unleashing their lawyers.

Apple might as well buy your project for iTunes since they are extremely behind in anything AI.
I think you just passed the CIA entrance exam. Please report to langley at your earliest convenience.
I believe they are referencing Former President Barak Obama's tweet.

>Cool clock, Ahmed. Want to bring it to the White House? We should inspire more kids like you to like science. It's what makes America great.

https://twitter.com/POTUS44/status/644193755814342656

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/09/16/440890750...
Sadly, it could also come off as "we won't do anything about it"
Do you have a source for this? The idea that Bitfinex consistently uses technical issues as an excuse to prevent redemptions is speculation and hearsay. You'd think the anti-Tether conspiracy theorists could provide solid evidence for an alleged $68 billion scam.
If you're extracting chlorine to react it with rock it probably makes more sense to just react the rock directly. But if you can use the chlorine industrially it makes more sense not to involve the mining and transport of rock. There's currently a significant industry of chlorine and HCl production that isn't linked to a carbon sequestration process that we can supplant.
Well, Italians, Spaniards, etc. are European. Latinos have a lot of heritage from those countries.
I've come across a number of factually incorrect 'fact checks' in my time online.

Perhaps not deliberate, it could just be that the person doing the fact checking was sloppy in their research or ignorant of other developments. Or maybe it was, who knows.

But either way, we shouldn't really be holding these fact checkers up as bastions of truth, in research papers or otherwise. They're not infallible.
Heck, F-15s can shoot down satellites.
Nuclear plants can provide plenty of excess electricity as well as heat for thermal desalination.
That's a good take, but the point I think is on revenue sharing.

You can use data, just reward the data owners a fair percentage based on the incoming revenue of the Company (big or small)
The CFTC and NYAG statements said in no uncertain terms that there were long periods of time where Tether did not have the money to cover their obligations. You have lowered the standard to the point where it is significantly easier to meet. All they need to meet your standard is to have inflows in excess of outflows - outflows lower than inflows plus marketable securities.

Letitia James says:

> The OAG’s investigation found that, starting no later than mid-2017, Tether had no access to banking, anywhere in the world, and so for periods of time held no reserves to back tethers in circulation at the rate of one dollar for every tether, contrary to its representations.

The CFTC says:

> As found in the order, Tether held sufficient fiat reserves in its accounts to back USDT tether tokens in circulation for only 27.6% of the days in a 26-month sample time period from 2016 through 2018.

It's literally not FUD, it's something they paid significant quantities of penalties over.
> These numbers are averages based on verified offer letters and RSU grant documents that Google employees have submitted to that website during the last couple of years, but I think the numbers do not account for annual RSU refreshers, performance bonus, or stock performance.

It's complicated, but I think they account for it in a way that gives a reasonably accurate picture in the steady state. levels.fyi for L6 says salary $244k, stock $187k/year, bonus $35k. Every year as a Google L6, I got a compensation letter with roughly that salary, equity refresh, and annual bonus. Each equity refresh vested monthly over the next four years. That means 4+ years in, you receive over the course of a year stock which was valued (at various times in the last four years) at about that equity refresh in total. Actual value when you receive it varies much more because that's what stocks do. And letters can vary more from year to year based on performance multiplier, you can get spot bonuses in addition to the annual bonus described in the letter, you may get promoted to level n+1 (or leave) before reaching level n's steady state, etc. On the flip side, it seems likely that along with the layoffs this year they didn't give anyone big annual bonuses or equity refreshes. I moved on a while ago so haven't asked.

Anyway, it's good money, and I'm really happy to see someone able to match it as a full-time open source maintainer. Filippo seems pretty exceptional though; I hope good open source compensation becomes normal.
I remember seeing a chatbot for fiction from the same website. Looks like it's the same tech but applied to a different book.
As the comments have mentioned, it's a fun experiment, but lots of engineering has to be done still to stop out of context answers.
Probably not, but also my personal experience says that you can't really replicate things just always from the patent. There's always some secret sauce to get things to work. The question is what exactly did Loon sell when they shut down and where did most of the people working on it end up? I know some folks at Loon and they went back to either Google Brain or some other moonshots in Google or Google Research but a lot of people didn't do that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Light_Teams
No one is free to shoot down an SR-71, because nothing you fire at an SR-71 will ever reach it. They're free to point at it, though.
"Alright, well.. that was the demo" :)

Seriously though, that was cool! What's your goal with this?
> But like the CEL (Celsius) a lot of the "market cap" of the coin is held in companies that are essentially insolvent

What insolvent companies hold tether?

If they did this would be the first thing they would unload as hey can always get park value for their tether.
Yes it will if the access to their website drops (and it will if people get information from a chat rather than visiting a website)
If the OP turns their macroeconomics textbook into a chatbot, you can ask it how labor has fared in the past with regard to how profits are maximized through industrial optimization. The response to your question directly may illuminate something to the affect of "it depends" or "yes and no". Certainly, big changes are inevitable. I used to work in industrial rope access and I remember when folks in the industry were scared of drones. But before that, scaffold builders were scared of rope access work. There will always be fear of change and a desire to protect our fiefdoms, but perhaps we rise above and find a new way to see opportunity, remain open, and flexible in life.
Best practice is to NOT store them. At least not on server side.
Speaking of wine, I've been trying to play simcity (2013) on Debian recently and proton, lutris and bottles have all failed me. If anyone happens to know what I can do to get past the initial black screen I'll take it.
Then it’s probably a good thing the iPhone SE is priced at $429—$17.87 per month on a two year contract.
It's interesting that they know it's Chinese already.
Leaky.
Part of being successful here is tooting one's horn.
I own one tether and I can't have Bitfinex convert it into a dollar for me. Is that good enough for you?
They are more than just a law, they are part of the constitution (much harder to change).

And the reason why the first 10 (the Bill of Rights) and some others are learned by all schoolchildren is because the rights delineated within directly address many dire problems Americans had suffered as British colonies (and why there was a war, so is said), and so the reasons why America was formed by its founders in the first place. Part of the mythology and moral license.
It applies to almost every single one of the 855 recognized species of figs. There are cultivars and techniques to make the common fig fruit without being pollinated, but I wouldn't characterize it as a "myth"
I think the main caveat is “Senior” and he means fairly senior at that anyone less will definitely have trouble, but if you’ve been in the industry 10-15 years and are looking to be your own boss and are very competent, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to do this and make comparable compensation.
*hugs* sorry for my failings
I vaguely recall using an official-seeming OS/2 Workplace shell that was meant to be both productive, and remind you in various places that if you like this, you'll probably like OS/2.
Your need to make everything an ideological 'us v them' projection aside I strongly urge you to stock up on iodine.
“Heidi” & “The Secret Garden” (2016)
Who is "they"? Afaik they're under new ownership that doesn't have anything to do with the past shady practices.
How long did it take you to read them? Did you read them in order as presented? Did you start with a strategy for retention or comprehension (especially with the non-modern English) so that it wouldn’t be wasted time?
Looks like you've found a different device there.
Your comment got a bit chopped up in the middle, did you mean something like "each year for the next 5 years"? Not sure how the math would work out though, half the price of the high end option is $500, and you'd need 2 mid range phones so $250. Maybe 1 on the condition working with custom ROMs and glued battery replacements is treated as $0/ignored.

I loved the freedom and flexibility of Androids but in the end the software lifecycles and the hardware have just fallen too far behind.