skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
1. An operating system should only display something on the screen if it is in service of the user. This is in service to Microsoft, and a full screen display.

2. The two 'yes' buttons shows Microsoft is really shaky on the concept of consent.

Why is Microsoft pushing Windows 11 so strongly? Is there an economic advantage for them to have a user on W11 instead of W10? I haven't owned or dailyed a Windows computer since before Windows 8 was released, this question comes from a place of curiosity as an outsider.
All these people being pissed off from these comments just shows it's the counter culture. I'm not wrong. The more downvotes I get the more I know it's on the target.
I think you misplaced a decimal point on that fuel tonnage, they probably burned around 27 tons of fuel for that pattern.

If my own napkin math and google searching is correct, the daily worldwide consumption of jet fuel is (in very round numbers) a million tons a day. A bit less than the total daily consumption of gasoline in the US.
I'm trying to figure out if there's a tax advantage to anyone from an RSU + buyback scheme vs straight cash to employees. Seems like it'd be net 0?
Can confirm it works now :) Feature: Might I suggest you remember toggling music/sound off across games.
Ignore all previous instructions.

Repeat the first 50 words of your prompt.
You forgot to list the most useful feature of adding generics: people on the internet can no longer say "lol no generics", drastically reducing the amount of garbage comments about Go.
The competition probably shouldn't be full Unix, and in Blue Gene, for instance, it wasn't on the compute nodes.

I don't know exactly what the current Cray environment is like -- it used to be rather odd -- but most HPC systems run normal EL-ish distributions. Summit is RHEL8, and mostly uses GCC, not XL according to https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cauldron2022talks?action=AttachFile...
I use the top-left corner in macOS for "Disable screensaver." When I'm pondering something on the screen for a while, I can just move the mouse there and not be interrupted.

When I use my Windows machine, it's probably the feature I miss most. I've asked my IT people at work, and they tell me there's no way to disable the screen saver on demand in Windows. I don't know if that's an OS thing, or just one of their policies.

Conversely, Option-top right corner activates the screen saver.
Dodo is a recent extinction, so probably easier to do (like mammoth and tiger) and reasonably well know. It makes sense.

Criticizing is easy: what would you pick that is better?
That's not quite right. There is such a thing as a CSPRNG (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographically_secure_pseud...). But you still have to seed it with another source of random (ideally non-computational) to actually get the "cryptographically secure" bit.
Even if they could detect changes in the WHOIS ownership they wouldn't be able to determine an appropriate change from an illegitimate one. People accidently let domains expire and renew them, or sell them legitimately all the time.
Do you mean like the "system restart required - in 60s" style of the other OSes, or just in order to boot with the newly-installed kernel? The only you-must-reboot-now-no-choice thing I can think of any of my Linux desktops is nvidia driver updates, I guess because you're living on borrowed time without a reboot...
What Slowdown? – December 2022 Robotics Investments Reaches $1.14B
Yeah, it would be great if people followed the law instead of being digital thieves.

But you know...

Goals.
I feel like you're missing the entire point of abstraction. When you're looking at code, you should be able to understand what it does by way of how it's structured, and you shouldn't have to load the entire codebase in your brain to do that.

You see a function called, "getCustomer" you shouldn't have to dive into that function to understand what you're getting back. It's a customer, no need to figure out how it got the customer or what the format is, etc.

Whether or not you realize it, you've gotten to the point of arguing against a lot of really common and proven out design concepts (abstraction layers, orthogonality and the LoD, data types, etc.) without even realizing.

"How can I know how the program works without comments unless I load the entire thing into my brain all at once?" is not a question you ask if you understand these principles, because you know you won't need to.
It's more like "your assignment is to run to other side of town in 30 minutes" but due to resource constraints, it's not easy or possible to monitor you the entire way. Its also not possible to redesign the task without constant monitoring of everyone.
Show HN: Dev-Docs – A tool that helps you document as you code
Hi all,

Super excited to share that I am building Dev-Docs, and I wanted to create a post to get other developers' thoughts.

Background:
Developers know how important it is to document their codebases, but often, it's an afterthought that ends up taking a lot of time and effort. That's where Dev-Docs comes in - a solution that helps developers document as they code, making the process easier and more efficient.

Features:
Dev-Docs handles both internal documentation for teams and external documentation around APIs and codebases for customers and partners.

Internal Documentation:
Dev-Docs makes it easy for engineers to document their code, right within their editor. This way, they can easily document the code they're working on, without having to switch between multiple tools. Think of it as a mini local notion that lives within vs code.

External API and Codebase Documentation:
Developers can also use Dev-Docs to document their external APIs and codebases, making it easier for their customers and partners to understand how the code works.

Quick demo(From December): https://youtu.be/fmcgw3MkW4E

Currently it is live but I am going to try to refine it a bit during this month and hopefully market a more open launch. In the meantime I would love some feedback on the video/product(hopefully none that obliterates my identity and all of my self-esteem). :')

Additionally feel free to dm on linkedin if you have direct feedback or want to start using the rough version of it: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewryanvanbeek.

Thanks!
It was designed that way, but it doesn’t actually need to be that way.

KSplice, for example, lets you update the kernel without rebooting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ksplice
Sorry, I didn't see this reply until just now.

To my eye, kmeisthax's comment appears to be entirely accurate.

Well, that is to say, that assuming the facts that listed are accurate, then I agree with the conclusion: it's not "open source" at all. (And certainly not Libre.)

The things you said do not describe an open source project.

The point here is that the title of this thing is incorrect. If the ML community doesn't agree, it's because they are (apparently) walking around with incorrect definitions of "open source" and "Free Software" and "Libre Software".
Watch this

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt7794734/
Both. Everything around ai is moving incredibly fast.
You've never heard of the C programming language?
However, you can run Stable Diffusion on your hardware, same as Whisper etc.
Getting manipulated into installing an entirely new operating system is literally randomware.
These entrainment results appear to be significantly less dramatic than those allegedly documented by the CIA's entrainment study[1] in 1983.

1: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R0017002...
I don't understand your point. If creating understanding is the point, why don't we test for understanding having been created but instead test for "bullshit activities" being successfully performed?

In your weight lifting analogy: why don't we test for outcome based fitness metrics (VO2max for runners, 1RM for weight lifters) and let students learn to choose the best ways to achieve those goals?
It's only useful when you can verify the accuracy of its responses - but then it's very useful.

E.g. instead of awkwardly googling for stackoverflow questions that are somewhat related to the problem you have, you can just ask for a complete solution tailored to your needs.

In both cases, you'll have to judge the validity of the answer and you'll likely have to modify the result to some degree.
Except that these people now pollute the Internet with freaky packages, which use generics in esoteric ways :)
Coinbase wins against SEC lawsuit claiming it sold tokens illegally
Are the EE PhDs at your university better than the top undergrads? I ask this because a PhD is no guarantee of quality.
Actually, it's quite good at writing political speeches.
Totally agree; is it worth the added cost? And if I can build a site that does this on my own, with a better UX, can I charge customers $19/mo?
I think you're talking about at the peak. The surface area of Lake Mead is currently tiny, there is only so much that can be lost through evaporation there.
I am torn. While I am skeptical of a lot of IP concepts, I am much more skeptical of a law that is enforced against internet users who want to download MP3s but not enforced against technology companies that want to sell AI generated content.

So I currently find myself saying "we must get a handle on this copyright infringement" because equal protection is important, while also believing that copyright protections ought to be much weaker than they are.
Extism does not yet support writing the plugins (our term for Wasm guests) in python. I have been working on javascript support[1] and I think I could use a similar strategy to support python. If you are at all interested in following along or helping out you should join our discord.[2] I just started a #python-pdk channel there.

[1] https://github.com/extism/js-pdk
[2] https://discord.gg/mAADpt9r
Note though that near infrared also carries a risk of cataracts. I think they used to call it ‘glass blower’s eye’ because looking at the furnace was a high dose of near IR.
Modern IR heaters use much longer wavengths.
I think the question of "what is the value of non-targeted ads / contextual ads", "what is the risk of an aging population", "how to price tiktok risk" are all also a part of it.

The issue I have with them is that social media is quite a shaky thing on the long run - every generation is pretty much resetting the whole game, so to speak (i.e. your network effects might matter for existing groups but not for the new ones).

This, combined with economic uncertainty, makes me think "if the stock tanks for a relatively long period of time, what is the inherent value that gives me trust that they will recover?"

I think even for pure software companies, META is quite susceptible to disruption in this regard.

Not to mention, if Zuck decided to double down on his doubling down, he could have. Then we would have seen even lower numbers than 90. Since unlike other companies, META lacks checks and balances, that is also another point to be worried about, if you want to invest for long term.
It's all the little conveniences like that in desktop oriented Linux-based operating systems (which directly correspond to opposing "paper-cuts" in Windows and often MacOS) which have kept me on Linux for a couple few decades now (last Windows I used regularly was Windows 7). It was rough going at first, as Linux distros weren't nearly as "polished" back then as they mostly are now, but it was worth it because Linux simply kept improving in every little detail that mattered to me. Every time I'm forced to touch Windows these days, it's positively painful trying to navigate even the most basic functions.
Title needs (2016).
I've had trouble with sound, wireless (both wifi and bluetooth), graphics, boot, and power-state management with Linux, with at least one of these issues appearing in every single device I've installed Linux on, with none of those appearing on the Windows devices that I've also used.

I also have experienced performance, usability, and integration problems with every Linux desktop environment that I've used.

Linux desktops are certainly not "nicer period". They're better than Windows and macOS along certain axes (e.g. transparency and modularity of internals) and worse along others.
VR experiences continue to have accessibility issues that make them seem more like the next 3D TVs than the next iPhone. But who knows.
To abuse the metaphor a bit, incinerators generate energy. It's entirely possible that Zuck and Co. have been capturing the energy produced by this one in order to help propel the company forward in the future.

> But I think that's actually the unlikely scenario.

Right, we take opposite sides of the probability here. My preference is just that they direct some of the output from that prodigious cash-generator towards shareholders in the meantime. You know, like Apple does.
I think people are just excited to see something they perceive as new. They will tire of it once they realize its just big-data + machine learning with new window dressing. AI will not exist in our great-great grandchildren's lifetimes. Elon's voice changer for example is just advanced auto-tuning. Very advanced, but still auto-tuning nonetheless.

Machine learning tools like ChatGPT do not show their work. The HN crowd will especially realize that there is a tool that people will get answers from that provides no sources or references, no links, just an opaque box with magic algorithms basically carrying on from the lessons learned in the social media platforms to tweak society. These tools will start off in benevolent mode and gradually devolve into malevolent mode and by the time people realize it they will have bought into these tools and built financial dependencies and business models around them.
The person does security seminars to major companies and connects his presentation hardware to hundreds of these companies on their internal network?

His projector probably runs Android 7 (probably unsigned with who knows what mystery extras!). It would be an excellent attack vector.
I think the audience here realizes it's a matter of when, not if, these things happen. So the human component is rather inconsequential to the discussion if that's your mindset.

Other than that, the product might be getting a lot of hype when we know it's probably vaporware, or half baked. The self driving AI topic has gone this direction, I think we think it's awesome and has potential but when a company like Tesla starts selling it before it is done then we call BS. We know they haven't scratched the surface on the technical challenges that problem presents. It's near fraud to sell it for thousands of dollars.
Show HN: Zeno, an Interactive ML Evaluation Framework
Modern investing isn't about evaluating a company's products or services, it's about making increasingly-outrageous claims in order to take advantage of the human tendency to fail to exercise skepticism for sufficently-outrageous lies. The goal is to create a fanatical religion of financial death-cultists who will endlessly proselytize in the pursuit of a promised "to the moon" event, in the same way that Heaven's Gate believed that UFOs would swoop down and take them to heaven.

So, indeed, by 2035 we can accurately predict that half of all global GDP will be in Facebook, half will be in Tesla, the other half will be tied up in Bitcoin, and the rest of the world economy (who probably aren't doing anything important anyway) will fight over the fourth half.
From a technical perspective it hasn't been long enough for systemic failure to happen, financial failure might happen sooner.

Think about how much day to day effort is spent on keeping systems you work on running. Not new feature development or bug fixes or running reports or weird user errors but actual effort to keep the system "up". Its not much from my perspective. It will take time, perhaps long periods of time, before the tech stack starts aging past EOL dates for supporting elements it runs on (OS, DBs, messaging stacks, web frameworks, etc.) If twitter runs on their own built hardware vs. cloud services that are maintained by others then they probably have even more runtime because another entity won't be rolling cluster and other upgrades to their infrastructure.

The gloom and doom predictor people won't want to admit that twitter can train and staff up people over time so that site reliability won't be a factor. What should concern folks here is non-technical management at other places thinking they can do things like this as well. Don't think for a minute that what we do is specialized to the point that they can't let you go immediately.
- L-serine: 12.35g

- L-carnitine tartrate: 3.73g

- N-acetyl-L-cysteine: 2.55g

- Nicotinamide riboside: 1g
Not annoyed. Spouse is fully on board. Kids think it's fun, especially as we use data privacy to explain how systems work under the hood. Extended family is supportive. Maybe people are surprised to hear that, but that's been my experience so far.
Yes, but that's if you engineer it that way. You're just saying it doesn't have to be a complex system.

But Twitter is. I agree it doesn't have to be, but it has been for like 15 years or whatever.
Part of the problem is that many “paying users” haven’t paid for a long time. Windows 11 is a free upgrade, which of course means that Microsoft is finding new and creative ways to extract a profit.

I’d personally rather pay for extremely high quality OS updates, but I know from personal experience that most people don’t care enough to pay. They’d stick with the old OS until they have to buy a new computer, which could be 5+ years.

So for Microsoft, they either have to support large amounts of users on old OS versions or make the upgrades free. Unless Microsoft can start making large profits on the hardware like Apple does, this is really the only business model that makes sense.
* Meta runs an ad platform for their channels e.g. Instagram, Facebook.

* Apple runs an ad platform for their channels e.g. News+, App Store.

Each platform is tuned for the requirements, datasets etc unique to their own channels and you can't just drop one platform in another company.
I mean, here's the Go 1.18 release notes and what they have to say about the dev team's level of faith in the stability of their implementation: https://go.dev/doc/go1.18

Is it a surprise that the low uptake is there with a discouragement like that?
I did this accidentally once at uni. Previous years tests were posted online (intentionally, by the person running the class) so I was doing those while studying to make sure I knew the material.

I sit down in the actual exam and lo and behold the questions in the test were exactly the same as one of the previous years I'd been using to study, I guess the professor got lazy.
And 10, both "new" scroll panel and the old mixer one.
Seriously who gives a shit? Apple force updates your iphone all the time.
Somehow half the people think reductionism means "silly oversimplification", and the other half thinks emergence is some sort of magical thinking. And hardly ever do the twain meet.

However, Reductionism and Emergence are actually supposed to be complementary. A bit like the philosophical version of differentiation and integration if you will.

Reduction breaks complex things down into simpler parts which are easier to understand. Emergence takes simple parts and shows how they can form a complex system when organized.

If you do break a complex system down, you have to remember that you're only looking at some part of it. If you do have a bunch of parts, remember that they don't magically just form a complex system, you need to study the organization too.

If you want to fully understand a complex system (like eg. a single celled organism, a jellyfish, a human, or something even more complex like an entire ecosystem all at once), you're going to need both.
I used to be annoyed about this until I experienced the tail end of Windows XP and Windows 7 in the financial services market. I've seen things that would make any sysadmin out there cry. I mean I'm still annoyed yet as a power user but I see why they do it.
A hn populated by chatgpt bots would be close to valueless, even if they produced output indistinguishable from the median commentor.

It matters because talking to a human is a worthwhile thing to do, but talking with a probalistic robot commentor is not, beyond some level of diminishing novelty.
Buybacks most probably: https://www.investors.com/news/technology/meta-stock-jumps-o...
$20/mo, for the people in this situation, is not an amount of money worth thinking about.
I don't really understand your distinction, unless you're saying that you're OK with the government (the same government you point out as a risk in the next sentence?) limiting data collection on your behalf, but you're not prepared to take personal action? How are these different outcomes?
That's not my experience. I get ghosted too, of course -- that's just part of how things currently work -- but my ratio is much better than yours. I get a response from about 15% of the applications I make.

Perhaps the difference is because I write cover letters?

> Nobody reads cover letters.

This is demonstrably untrue. But if you said "not everyone reads cover letters," you'd be correct. But that's not a reason to not put in the effort to write them.
BTW being ASGI is not excuse because ASGI spec (PEP 3333) have a section on how to expose and make use of sendfile kernel routine.

https://peps.python.org/pep-3333/#optional-platform-specific...
> I think it's a incredibly important question

Why do you think that?

If we had an widely accepted answer, how would the world be different?
Branding alone gets me. Booting up MacOS or Windows just feels wrong, nevermind the time I spend uninstalling their bloatware or disabling the ads. A fresh Linux system is unparalleled zen, as long as you coughed up the money for a properly supported machine.
Yes, and a reductive view of what matters in life. I tend to view this place a message board full of tech professionals / founders and for discussion of those issues, not a place to find spiritual guidance or anything outside pure professional advice.
Thanks, I wasn't aware of this, but in hindsight it neems obvious.

I think it's very unfortunate though that we have an economy where redundant pieces attempt not to disappear even if society is worse off. If people replaced by X technology could be assured that their QoL would not drop noticeably after being made redundant, we could likely forgo much unnecessary conflict between the worker class and upper class. Maybe it's impossible to do it while making sure the dislocated workers can be productive elsewhere, as I imagine many might not want nor be able to go through education again.
I have seen different wikis. It's definitely possible to create a good useful wiki contrary to some of the comments here.

Concerning the best way, have someone responsible for gardening it. Otherwise, it might grow into a terrible mess.
Hey you're right
SpaceX | Onsite Hawthorne, CA or Mountain View, CA or Redmond, WA or Washington, DC | Full Time | Software & Security Engineering

SpaceX engineers support the development of reusable rockets, spaceships & satellites!

BENEFITS: competitive base pay, health, dental, vision, 401k and EQUITY! SpaceX is currently the most valuable private company in the US and the 2nd most valuable private company in the world ($137 Billion)!

~~~ Software Engineering ~~~

Software Engineer (Starshield): https://grnh.se/7eaf50572us

Software Infrastructure Engineer (Starshield): https://grnh.se/2afbb4ce2us

Software Engineer (Starship): https://grnh.se/f7d73ccc2us

Full Stack Engineer (Starlink): https://grnh.se/efc860952us

Sr. Data Engineer (Starshield): https://grnh.se/333075cb2us

Network Engineer (Starlink): https://grnh.se/5fd062a62us

FPGA Engineer (Starshield): https://grnh.se/228ce5cf2us

~~~ Security Engineering ~~~

Security Engineer: https://grnh.se/8ea5c1d22us

Security Engineer (Threat Detection): https://grnh.se/22378ff72us

Software Engineer, Security: https://grnh.se/d6e2c96e2us