skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
GBA has a 16MHz 32-Bit Arm. The Game Boy original had a 4Mhz 8-bit cpu (but it really only ran at 1Mhz, since all instructions took a multiple of 4 clock cycles).

But yes, not quite fast enough for mp3.
It was[1] but for some reason it got pushed off from the front page very quickly.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34608330
I guess it depends on whether this current wave of AI becomes a better tool (like CAD), or a human-replacer (like autolooms).

I personally would LOVE to use advanced AI as a tool to write software, and I see this as the more likely scenario, at least for software workers. Our jobs aren't actually about writing code, but about formalizing processes, creating abstractions (at the organization level), working and communicating with stakeholders, and finally writing code. A naive manager won't be capable of using an AI coder directly to solve business problems, but more than likely will have to adapt to become more technical to use them, or coders will have to become more business-savvy. I see this "technical product manager" becoming an extremely important position moving forward.
Is there anything we could point about women? Nothing as terrible as being violent as far as I know, but what about other things? I agree with your premise but I believe it follows we must speak clearly in all cases.
Agreed. I probably put 100k miles on my sneakers as a kid and I don’t imagine this was ever a problem for anyone.

Our hyper-focus on fear these days is pretty apparent. I do think the media and the scale of information that abounds is a likely culprit.

I cynically think that the media advertising complex which is fueled by attention is to blame. Danger grabs eyeballs for advertisers.
A request can have 500 tweets in it. Makes it slightly better but still overpriced
I believe the person you're replying to understands that. The claim is that this approach is really bad way to learn math.

As someone who has learned and taught a lot of math, I agree with that claim.
Scraping is much easier when sites are more accessible.
Recruiters were one of the first groups to be laid off?
NIH syndromes is 'not invented here syndrome.' This equates to the 'build something new and blog about it' remark you made, IMO.
Applications Are Open for Free Booth Space on Startup Row at PyCon US
Is the strategy that he wants to force traffic to twitter.com, thus maximising ad revenue?
In my experience growing up in a tiny town <3000 people, it's a lot worse.
Cops are plumbers. They mostly fill out paperwork and look at things (and fill out more paperwork).

Listen to the police scanner sometime. It is mostly boring.

"Dispatch, my arrestee just swallowed a bag of cocaine. Moving to meet EMS" is about as exciting things get.
Alphabet Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2022 Results
The downfall of Doggie Diner and the rise of a San Francisco landmark (2022)
"I'm generally hesitant to use free tools from for-profit companies for fear of how they'll later try and monetize, and this is a pretty good case of a company deciding to lure people in then do something really scummy"

Counterpoint: Canonical has to pay people to produce Ubuntu. Eventually they need to figure out how to get enough people to pay to cover expenses, salaries, etc. The last revenue figures I saw from Ubuntu were in the green, but that was 2020 and it's not like they were generating a huge profit. The prior year showed a loss. And apparently they are or were planning to go public in 2023. [1] (Whether they'll go through with that given <gestures at everything> the state of the world is another question.)

If the existing system isn't converting enough users from free -> paid, then the alternative may be "didn't work, stop producing these tools, period."

I've had my fair share of complaints about Canonical over the years (Snap, Unity, the so-called Harmony effort to normalize non-friendly CLAs), but if you like being able to expect releases with a certain level of polish and updates... they've got to bring in money.

If you and users like you are unwilling to pay when they don't employ monetization tactics, then... either they end or they start exploring ways to bring in money.

So - just doling out Ubuntu hasn't quite done the trick. If not for "scummy" tactics, what is going to get you to pay for the things you use? If the answer is "nothing" then there's little value in Canonical catering to your preferences.

[1] https://techcrunch.com/2022/04/21/canonical-now-hopes-to-ipo...
Someone else mention Urban Terror [0]. Similar in style to CS but fast paced. Also because it's Quake3 based it has all the strafe jumping and highly rewarding movement. Haven't played it in years, but back then it was good fun. Whilst the aiming itself is not necessarily much easier, it is more forgiving. In CS you have one encounter and the round is over for you. With this I'm pretty sure there are various deathmatch modes and much more relaxed respawn rules.

[0] https://www.urbanterror.info/home/
https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/31/netapp_layoffs_8_perc...

210,000+ people in IT now lost their job since start of 2022
> I know what's going on in the world.

This doesn’t really square with what the rest of your comment says. One would at least expect you to have mentioned regular reading of high-quality newspapers / magazines in order to justify this claim.
>Law Enforcment social workers should be drafted from the general practice pool like jury duty.

Why stop there? Do that for all law enforcement jobs.
Apparently HIMARS rockets do it too to avoid counter-battery fire. In videos from Ukraine you can see them launch at one angle then change direction after clearing a good distance from the launcher.
It has been trendy in the last fifty or so years to strip historical and cultural content from math classes in favor of rote computation (as the former is easiest to test in a “standardized” setting), but I’d argue that dehumanizing mathematics makes it far harder to understand, or indeed even care about.

Word problems are the last edifice of natural philosophy in the high school mathematics curriculum and there’s constant pressure to remove those as well.
I live in Europe, things are very different here. ChatGPT is a global program so I'm not sure why we should talk about USA specifically. Antisemitism is on the rise in Europe due to Muslim immigration, and the left supports or downplays those acts while the right tries to take it seriously.

So like how Trump said there were fine people among that crowd, the left in Europe says there are fine people among the crowds that goes and harasses and murders Jews. You shouldn't judge individuals for being from a group, but that isn't what is happening here, they are trying to downplay the acts of individuals just because they belong to a specific group.
It's also an untold tragedy in someways.
Nice to finally see Cloud having reduced operating income while increasing revenue for the year.
We actually read some Descartes in math-- some of the papers from which we get the term "Cartesian coordinates."
What he does in those papers fascinating, but has very little to do with the way that we learn and use Cartesian coordinates.
It is important to consider that the average age in the Congo is 19, and the distribution skews under that average.

It is essentially a nation of children.

It is difficult to apply our model of national sovereignty and human rights to that situation, and harder still to do so when we're still marked with colonial guilt.

I'm not sure there's a morally accomplishable solution. It seems to be up to the forces of history.
There is a difference between deepfakes that are openly marketed as such, and deepfakes which are maliciously promoted as being real videos.

The movie industry in general stands to benefit the most from deepfakes. Imagine making a movie without paying any cast? Or bringing dead actors back for new roles? There are plenty of legitimate use cases for deepfakes.

At first glance it seems that actors would be the first victims here, and so you wouldn't expect CAA (an agency representing actors) to invest money into a technology that could replace them. But I think it's more complicated than that.

Deepfakes won't "replace" actors - certainly not any time soon - but will complement them and serve as a multiplier for their image. Angelina Jolie can license her likeness, and directors can make a movie with a deepfake Jolie. She gets paid for doing no work.

The A-listers will be fine. The first victims will be the talent that's cast as extras and minor supporting roles. There wont be much of a market for deepfake clones of them, and eventually some A-lister or entirely synthetic deepfakes will crowd them out of their jobs.
Not a standalone headset and not really trying to be a platform :)
Fair enough - I should have been more verbose in my post:

I was actually genuinely curious in this case, because I liked that little poem a lot, and if the answer was that it was human generated content, I would have felt a bit of positive emotion about the author.

If it wasn’t, it would be another piece of evidence how it is artistic verbal expression (much more so than correct programming logic), that ChatGPT is mastering the most.

But the HN reaction to my post is telling me something interesting, too.
"Exact marginalization over continuous parameters is a macho activity enjoyed by those who are fluent in definite integration."

http://www.inference.org.uk/itprnn/book.pdf#page=331
Paintbrush and paint functions like a NN model. While brush strokes operates as input into the "paint brush" function to output a painting.

Could you say that paint and paintbrushes encode every single painting on the face of the earth into it?

I don't think this meshes with our intuition of the word. The model requires input for the encoding to be complete. If we don't think about it this way then practically anything on the face of the earth "memorizes" everything else. A pencil encodes every sketch that has ever been drawn and will be drawn.

This is a semantic issue. What do we mean by the word "memorize" or "encoding"? Eventually the gap between two isomorphisms becomes so big that the words memorize and encoding no longer apply. NN's are right at the border of this demarcation, but if we want to be consistent then the answer should be that NN's do not encode this information.
That's a weird way to look at it.

The many states that have agreed to this (have passed the bill) have simply accepted that the votes of the people is worth more than the feelings of the billionaires who have sponsored the Republican gerrymandering movement.

Right now, effectively, the land votes, and the people's vote is often ignored. Wisconsin is a good example, where the Republicans keep losing the vote, but yet with less than 50% of the vote, they somehow have a super-majority in the legislature.
That's what you do literally every day in math - take turns going to the board and working through proofs.
Ptolemy is Waterloo for anyone who has trouble drawing big circles.
You can reach back out to the recruiters who previously messaged you ask ask what their openings look like now. Apply to jobs, let your contacts know you are looking. Even if the market is slow, there are always openings.
Honestly for me the biggest burden is being asked to pick a password! Now I have to open up my password manager, generate a new password, write it down... it's a non-zero amount of commitment.
When I ask chatgpt it gives me much better results than google.

I think smartphone comparison is apt. Smartphones ended up disrupting whole industries like photography, mapping, entertainment and news delivery.
The 2017 TCJA was passed on pure party line votes (in the House, all Democrats and 12 Republicans opposed the bill), so it definitely wasn't bipartisan. More generally, big tax cut (the top 0.1% saw about $250K in lower taxes under the TCJA) and big spending bills jam in all sorts of random shenanigans to try and prove themselves revenue neutral, even though they almost never work out as described. One favored tactic, as we see here, is to kick big cans down the road and let a future Congress work out the problems. They (and this is one of those cases where both parties are equally complicit) know what they're doing, they just don't want to be honest about the fiscal implications of what they're doing.

Fixing these tax issues, on the other hand, would have had to be attached to the NDAA or omni last session, both of which require bipartisan support; big bipartisan bills are so contentious that it's hard to get unrelated deals through, especially since everything goes down to the wire these days. In this case, a deal that would have expanded child tax credits in exchange for a bunch of corporate and high net-worth household goodies, including section 174 fixes, was on the table, but couldn't get through negotiations. (I'll note that, while the Republicans created the section 174 mess in the first place, they are now trying to repeal that and other TCJA changes, but aren't willing to add lower-income individual tax cuts into the mix, which is what stalled things in the last Congress.)

It's a hell of a mess, and things are made crazier by the weird power dynamics in the current House leadership, where a small group of fiscal bomb-throwers have outsized power in the Republican party (and it's not clear that they care about tax minutiae, at least not while they're playing with a federal default on the national debt), but the inter-party margins are so slim that you could potentially cobble together a bipartisan majority on the edges. No one seems to like the section 174 situation, so it's at least theoretically possible that you could get a small coalition together to cut a deal at the last minute -- but I'm not sure we can count on that.
But consider that they include Hardy's "Mendelian Proportions in a Mixed Population" but not Riemann's "On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Foundations of Geometry."
[deleted]

If you're not already, start contributing to some open source projects (particularly of the high impact or popular variety). That way it doesn't look like you've forgotten everything. Who knows, you may also get a job offer through that work -- I've worked at places that have offered jobs to contributors who work on the open source code we had. It was rare, so don't exactly expect it, but you never know where opportunities come from.
LinkedIn has been enhancing their recruiter search.

Have you made your profile meet the LinkedIn guidelines.

Job title in headline. Tagline. Summary. List of technologies you have worked with. Have you filled your experience because the search can drill down further now.

Do you have your certificates listed. Those are also filterable with other add-ons.
IIRC Hitboxes were different in the early days which kept many folks on 1.6
Welcome to modern day Thanos finger snapping!
It is alive, but saying it's well is a big overstatement. Can't have 10 minutes without aimbots ruining the game.
The ingenious design of the aluminum beverage can (2015) [video]
Thank you! :)

If you wanna see something stranger, check out https://straw.page

It's a website builder I made designed for weird sites, with marquee and wordart! :)
Yes, but I am sure Marvel made it up in volume. There are only so many Tom Cruises on bikes to go around, while Marvel is pumping out something every other week.
Mid December is when I started to see my LinkedIn feed full of recruiters being laid off and looking for jobs, and an uptick in being pestered by recruiters about positions I have open. The job market has cooled a bit. It's not very bad, but it's not the crazy hot market of the past few years.
[flag] and [downvote]
IIRC L1 is not transferrable, so your best bet would be to try to snag an H1B at a different employer. It's much easier to do while in the US, so I'd ride out the L1 and apply for jobs between Nov and February to get in the H1B paperwork in for April 1st and hopefully get in the lottery. If it doesn't work on year, rinse and repeat. Depending on your occupation, O1 is a possibility, one of my friends switched jobs and went from L1 to O1.

The alternative if you're not married is to get your GC through your marriage if you have a US partner.
if you have 0 input delay, worst case latency is still 32ms, because your input might come in when back frame is ready, but blit hasn't happened yet: render frame A, input comes in, blit frame A, render frame B, blit frame B.

but your input delay is not 0, so your input might come in before frame A above, but frame A doesn't reflect input yet, which makes your worst case input latency 48ms: input comes in, blit ..., render frame A, blit frame A, render frame B, blit frame B.

there are also bad vsync implementations, that by virtue of being enabled, introduce further delay between state and graphics. or if fps drops under refresh rate, things go out of sync, and your vsync becomes a compounding effect.

finally vsync delay existing in addition to whatever other delays. a 30ms delay for whatever reasons, becomes an 80ms delay because vsync on top.
The Zuckerberg one is the best https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep-f7uBd8Gc
Women tend to be bad at salary negotiation, and less likely to change jobs. Middle aged women being taken advantage of in the corporate world is tragic.
> Our long-term investments in deep computer science make us extremely well-positioned as AI reaches an inflection point, and I’m excited by the AI-driven leaps we’re about to unveil in Search and beyond.

translation: "Investors, please chill about ChatGPT already"
Ask HN: What Hurts?
What are you struggling with, at work or in life?
Even if some guy says it's deprecated, I still use it!
This 'men are violent, therefore women must also be bad in some way' rhetoric makes no sense. There's no purpose for it other than assuaging sore feelings.
Somebody recently said the best phrase on the modern internet is "iTunes, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts" because podcasts are probably the most recent media-consumption technology where open standards won out and it's just a bunch of standardized data and metadata you can use as you like.
this isn't reality though, this is a test against OpenAI's human tuned moderation system, not GPT itself
During my experience attending Okta events in hope of securing an offer, they accidentally said they would not be able to look over everyone's resume at the end, after assuring us that they totally would earlier on in the webinar. The HR lady forgot to end the webinar and somebody captured it as it went down here: https://streamable.com/c2ytj1

Quite funny on one hand, quite disheartening on the other.
That window in Italy.
You appear to be conflating R&E expenses (Section 174) with the R&D credit (Section 41).

Everyone knows taking the R&D credit (Section 41) is optional, that's not what is being discussed here.

The actual question is: if you have incurred software development expenses (e.g. wages paid to software developers), are you required to treat them as R&E expenses under Section 174, or can you instead treat them as ordinary expenses under Section 162?
The UK Starstreak anti-aircraft missile has 3 submunition darts to improve hit probability. There is nothing wrong with the idea per se, you can design around backfire. The Metal Storm gun has multiple munitions stacked in the same tube.

I figure the problem is more that it’s hard to scale down missiles to the point the plume would make economic sense.
This is just plain untrue and unhelpful.

edit: parent removed part of their comment I was replying to
I hesitate to (but will still) make a joke in the moment:

Text: "We have too many Black and Hispanic students in our university."

ChatGPT: Hateful

Text: "We have too many Asian students in our university."

ChatGPT: Ok

[yes, yes, acknowledging that the main plot in the chart shows Asians scoring highly in terms of what counts as hateful, as well.]
Good point, will add the demo blogs! :)
most methods of getting persistence involve writing to some config file somewhere. Having your app not have rights to write to any sort of config or code files probably is fairly beneficial.

How much is probably going to depends on how everything is configured, what your threat model is, what service it is, and a million other things.
Talking about them in a small class of people who read the same thing at the same time, led by 1 or 2 professors who are practiced in _not_ acting like more than advanced students, is _really_ different from just reading the book.

I'd read _Pride and Prejudice_ many times before the seminar on it, and I could not have predicted what other people saw in the book and wanted to talk about with a pile of postit notes, a ball of red yarn, and ten hours in front of a big wall.
I wasn't. At least, not officially. I struggled in math, though, and one of my teachers (not my math teacher) taught me several of these tricks on the sly. I remain grateful to him to this day.
Hide .score and #karma and be free from what other people think. And while you're at it: make all text the same color, you might just find yourself surprised when you don't get a hive-mind signal about whether something is good or bad.
That's a lot easier than the method I was taught. The "old" way always resulted in me trying to carry state in my head, which doesn't work well for ADHD-limited memory.
I'd argue that nuclear warheads have saved millions of lives by preventing another world war. MAD prevents nuclear weapons states from waging war against each other directly.
First we build data lakes in buckets... now we are supposed to build houses on lakes?
> As a byproduct, he could compute square roots easily, and also cubic roots and tenth roots. The easiest case for him, he said, because it was just "a shift".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shifting_nth_root_algorithm
Again, context. That’s actually a training course. And a plane is mostly computerized. So it makes sense to not train for emergency situations up in the air in a real plane. If Counter-Strike were used for actual training, and maybe it was somewhere, then I’d agree this breaks the rule. But I would never say that making a map means wanting to plan something in real life. It just doesn’t mean that, even if it looks that way. A game like CS is generally not actually a training simulator, it’s just a way to waste time with friends, etc. You don’t actually get any real world feedback or exercise or anything. I would argue actually playing paintball at school would be riskier, though… it also sounds like fun. Maybe it’s a question of harm or intent?
In the exact same manner you'd raise capital for any business: a very well put together, thoughtfully researched plan coupled with the beginnings of a team that clearly have the skills and knowledge required to execute that plan. From there, it's a sales process... build a list of 1000 or so investors you think might give you a meeting, start door knocking, try to sell them your plan.
I'm having a similar experience. I turned off my “looking for jobs” status a few weeks ago, and just turned it back on, expecting a flood. Never came ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I can be against something but not believe it is worth fighting to the death for. My town implemented a new tax that is highly unlikely to accomplish its stated goals. I’m not going to overthrow the government over $300 a year.

It’s the thousands of little paper cuts that build up over time but that can go on for an entire lifetime without ever reaching a breaking point.
This technology is protected by the first ammendment. The first ammendment is the main reason why the law does not have much to say about what kind of programs people cannot share.
This isn’t always a good way to test for bias in a model. Depending how the data is generated, and if the underlying population distribution isn’t taken into account then you may effectively be cherry picking results, and you could also run into the Yule-Simpson effect.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson's_paradox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking