skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My freshman year roommate at university (who was a random assignment) ended up dropping out of his science major our first year and decided he wanted to pursue being a cop. When I asked him why he said "I just want to be able to fuck with people", sort of jokingly, but also you could tell he meant it.

He was a nice guy if he knew you, but he was also brash and arrogant. If you put someone like that in an environment with other people that are also there for the power trips, these sorts of situations are the outcome you get.
I used to fly over to the US for work a lot, and even though I was usually in California, and got what I presume is a rather mild version of what you might run into elsewhere, seeing US TV was always a bizarre experience. It was like entering another dimension where every minor little thing was amplified ten times over.

Makes it seem even more bizarre that Americans aren't out in the streets rioting on a much more regular basis.
> You can organize others in your group, in other disadvantaged groups, and even allies in the socially dominant groups and try to change society to be more just.

If you look at the disadvantaged subgroups in American society that ultimately overcame those disadvantages (Jews, Cubans, Chinese, Vietnamese, Mormons, etc.) they did't achieve that through organizing and solidarity and social change. They assumed that nobody was going to help them and acted accordingly.

> Atomization and learned helplessness are tools of these unfairly-advantaged groups.

A moral framework that emphasizes the role of personal actions in outcomes is a survival strategy. It's not a creation of "unfairly-advantaged groups." It's something you see over and over in societies confronted with harsh realities, from pioneers to Puritans to third-world villagers. Hoping that "allies in the socially dominant groups" are going to come to your rescue one day--instead of using your support to advance their own interests--is what's "learned helplessness."
thought it'd be more than an icon
Thank you.

I am afraid I don't know and couldn't easily find any research. I did find this post, but it looks like SEO spam a little, and doesn't cite the essay claim: https://www.bookishelf.com/the-importance-of-information-ret...

I'll ask Prof Roediger as we occasionally communicate and will aim to get back to you. However, I wouldn't be surprised if any correlation was not statistically significant.
I hate that this is a self-perpetuating fear. The more people fear, the less people walk on the streets, which makes the neighbourhood appear less safe and vibrant.
Depending how deeply you use it for each org a browser profile for each can ve done. If you do it in Firefox you can even do it in 1 window with tabs via containers. Downside is it doesn’t have the native desktop integrations at that point.
> And if these officers' actions were not in line with written department policy, then they need to be treated as private citizens harassing people under the color of law, and be held personally criminally liable for the false imprisonment, etc.

Have to get rid of qualified immunity first, which we invented (in a total coincidence) at the same time cops really wanted to be thumping civil rights protesters without consequencews.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierson_v._Ray
I removed my hub about 5 years ago. Insteon switches create a mesh network and have relationships with each other without internet or hub. There's also a usb interface module if you want offline LAN control.
Not related to kids but while living in Singapore. My friend and I lived in a 2 bedroom apartment block, most apartments have a gate on them, and in 2 years we had over a dozen visits from neighbours and police because different families were ringing up our neighbours or the police to tell them our door was open (even tho the gate was closed and locked, we just wanted fresh air).

While living in Australia I used to have our front desk remind me to not leave the door open on the deck because “your annoying neighbour keeps calling us to say you left the door open while you were at work”.

I don’t know why people can be so… annoying like that. Like they just sit in their window looking for things to complain about.
"So you're saying you know this guy who built a jet out of cardboard?"

"Yes. And it works."

To be honest this did make me laugh.
I think I'd go about it using redux-thunk because I feel like render function is not a great place for complex async state changes and chcecking internal status of a promise is a bit low level, but you've built a nice, easy to use thing. If you published it some people might find it to be exactly what they need. Plus they might help you debug some corner cases.
Personally, I use Youtube only in a contextual way. From a blog, newsletter, social network, whichever...somebody points out an interesting video and I may watch it.

I do not ever visit youtube.com as some kind of home landing page and think "let's see what's going on today, what interesting content there is today".

Because the answer always is: an infinite amount of it.
Yeah, it’s not even a question regarding the richest, but change it to upper middle class families with busy and reasonably wealthy parents living somewhere in dense urban NYC downtown and it’s interesting how they go about it.
Similar up here in Hanover NH. All the neighborhood kids just walk where they want to, and it’s totally fine.
> And whoever may or may not have called 911 should be publicly berated.

They could file a FOIA for 911 call recordings during that timeframe. It's likely no calls were made.
That label was invented hundreds of years ago when the unincorporated land here was larger than continental Europe. But it's a different story now, the gas has expanded to fill all available space and there is no more freedom.
People certainly make choices, and choices are important to you future and to people around you's future. The question is, did your conscience being have control over the choice you made, or did the meat sack make it.
Apple Pay (like Apple wallet) doesn’t charge anything inherently. If you’re buying a subscription (like to an app) through the App Store, with or without Apple Pay, they charge 30%. These are two different things.
That is by design and I consider it a feature rather than a bug. We have options to live at a local or state level closer to our own values rather than being forced to conform at a national level.

Our national institutions are very accepting of LGBTQ as well as the federal government. Looking at LGBTQ equality by state, https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps the majority of the country, 29 states are fair or pro LGBTQ vs 21 that have negative policy or low equality.

Additionally, 71% of people support same-sexy marriages https://news.gallup.com/poll/393197/same-sex-marriage-suppor...

Is it still counterculture when it is accepted and embraced by the overwhelming majority of citizens, education and cultural institutions, and protected by laws in the majority of the country?
I think it's a fundamentally different thing, morally speaking.

Imagination is fleeting, ephemeral, jumbled, and usually linked to a specific state of mind that passes once the person has either grown bored of the imagination of achieved whatever satisfaction they wanted from it.

A deep fake image or video is persistent on your device and may leak some day, but worse is that feels real in a way mere imagination never can and it's something a person could go back to over and over, feeding into and enhancing their obsession with the non-consenting person.

I think it's a bad thing in ways that imagination and porn are not.
Which is also super wrong because median income for full time employees is $54,000
No, I don't think you can give Vercel that credit.

The current flat style (also called material or modern design) is a rejection of skeuomorphism or trying to make interfaces that look real. Instead we got lot of flat boxes all lined up with similar text and icons. You can thank/blame Google for making this popular at first. Then, the web frameworks like Angular (first), React, and Vue started shipping components in this style (Twitter Bootstrap, too). Since those frameworks are everywhere, that look is everywhere.
I can already fire off emails and text messages claiming to be whomever I want. I can even hire impersonators and lookalikes. I don’t get the big push against these newer technologies.
needs a (2012)
Putin is a statist who believes the citizens of his country exist to serve it's (and effectively his) interests. Therefore, Snowden will express whatever opinion is most beneficial to the state as it will be the least detrimental to him.
> So if the "other side" moderates itself somehow, this demand is never going to stop.

The demands for change never stop in democracy, that's how it works. The point PG is making is that if the mean on the left keeps shifting then they are by definition excluding and making enemies of people that were previously allies. If they stopped doing that, they could actually gain influence and start effecting change on real issues. This pathological behaviour of the left eating itself is why they're still marginalized.

The other factor at play is that both parties in the US benefit financially from maintaining an almost equal balance of power. Each party holds up the other as the boogeyman to drive donations. Someone needs to get the money out of politics, at least via publicly funded elections. This is a left policy, and if the left could stop eating itself on other issues as described above, they could actually get it done.
Mistaken fossil rewrites history of Indian subcontinent for second time
Hi, do you have ML/data roles available for remote candidates in Europe?
I think this is their cut after Steam and Kitfox have had their share. The gross from half a million sold is $15M.
>> yet people use car because they don't want to travel in crowded public transport with stinky homeless people

Sounds like it would work if homelessness was solved, which isn't a bad objective for its own sake anyway.

My city (Nantes) offer free public transport on the W-E. It has an obvious cost, but one I am more than willing to pay. The thing is, you get the best return on that kind of choice when you completely get rid of ticketing and all the associated costs (sale of tickets, composting, roving 'ticket patrols'), and few cities are ready to make that jump when the ticketing infrastructure is already paid for.

>> So essentialy communism forcing landlords to lower their rent to the level so people who will destroy their property will move there essentially making owning property worthless.

There is a cost for space in a city. There are maintenance needs wherever an office is occupied or not, wherever it subscribe to utilities or not. A company in a building pay taxes, and those are used to maintain road, water and electricity networks, among plenty of other things. If you want to wait until you have the best possible tenant, that's fine but you shouldn't expect the rest of the community to subsidize your tenant-shopping.

>> This blog sounds pretty stupid and lazy without providing any answers, very lazy writing, sounds more like some cheap alcohol rant.

Mirror advised.
Leaving aside that this article is written very much from one point of view, it's worth drawing comparisons with Argentina and things like the pari passu bond litigation. That statement is probably hyperbole, but there is a real premium to be paid if investors start thinking that there is more risk than expected to their investment.

On the other hand, the CJEU is basically right, in a sense of legal sovereignty that both the US and UK will recognize in their own ways: countries should not be beholden to foreign court decisions if they can at all help it. The EU has a court system, the CJEU is at the top of it, and its decisions should be final.

The real problem is the ability of countries to enter into agreements that promise some investor return that turns out to be against subsequent public policy or even entirely ruinous. The most egregious case was https://theconversation.com/when-even-winning-is-losing-the-...

(some more background, clearly translated from Spanish https://microsegur.com/en/spain-lost-four-international-arbi... )

Heck, I'm the beneficiary of such a scheme myself: I'm the holder of a legacy UK feed-in-tariff agreement that means I get paid about £0.15 for each unit of electricity I generate, regardless of whether I use or export it and regardless of market price. Until this year that was a substantial subsidy - as intended by the policy!
Fairly certain they already are incorporated. If you pay yourself with dividends you're paying corp tax + long-term capital gains, so 8.7% (for a delaware s-corp) + max 20% (less if they pay themselves minimal salary I believe) for a total of 28.7% (vs 50%).

IANAA.
I don't think most people that use it in casual conversation (which isn't logically sound to begin with) are using it in good faith. In my experience, it's used to shut down concerns that people have based on previous experiences or history. It's also usually served with a "Gotcha!" attitude, as if the listener has found some golden ticket to shut down conversation.
I'm being serious. The competitive nature that you mention proves the point. Don't compete.

Are you a local coffee shop or clothing designer? Why would you be advertising on Facebook when you should be partnering with a local news site or city/town interest site, or going to meetups, or sponsoring local events?

Relying on Facebook ads builds artificial demand, subjects you to extreme competition, and ultimately either you have to spend too much to maintain or you eventually lose customers because the only reason they were interested in your product was the ads in the first place. Live by the ad, die by the ad.
I think that's exactly what OP was describing
This article was missing something to me. There are definitely inequities in “luck”: genetics, upbringing, etc., that one has no (or very little) influence over. The author uses this to draw the conclusion that, more or less, if you’re unlucky, that sucks. You had better hold your hand out and wait for someone with better luck to come by and help you. If that fails, you better head to the ballot and fill every bubble with a “D” next to it if you want any chance of a good life.

This is the learned helplessness that, IMO, fuels modern socialism here in the US. It’s the “there’s nothing I could have done” sentiment. It’s the “I wasn’t born into wealth” sentiment. Even if there are situations in life that confer one a disadvantage, why not make the best of them? Yes, it takes effort to have self control and make good decisions. That doesn’t mean people should be told that their circumstances in life provide them a “get out of jail free” card to not even attempt to exercise them. That type of thinking is defeatist.

I support a meritocracy. In accordance with that, I think we should aim to reduce the inequities that our social structure creates. Drawing attention to those pain points is useful and can be something we can improve upon. Telling entire swaths of people that their upbringing was unlucky and that’s the cause of their lot in life is not a recipe for empowering those people. So long as they are stuck waiting for someone else to fix their problems, IMO, they will never have them fixed.
I suppose it looks like Windows 95/98, and if you don't already know what that looks like, it's probably not a product you're interested in anyway.
>I could imagine that OAI could be leveraged for single features

That's a possible application which won't be easily copied by the large company. But the value of such features is quite limited.

> I could imagine content moderation, or reading sentiment from user tweets about a company.

I am pretty sure that these services will be provided soon by large companies and OpenAI. They are generic enough to have wide market, and many of these companies already have expertise in them.

>So, no content generation, as that would be unethical without disclosure of AI usage.

Why unethical? I think these systems could create real content which is useful to everyone as well as spam content could be generated by humans.
when the MacBook/apple announcement come up you have high 3 to 4 digit amount of comments here, and there's 0 comments on the latest Samsung's announcement... i think that tells one pretty well about how effective samsung's "shot" will be. yawn.
Not surprising to see something else good from Si Labs!
Size tells you very little.

5 million is bigger by headcount than Big Tech, while half the households is smaller.

Big tech lobbies for what serves its interests. NRA lobbies likewise. So does Stonewall, effecting change with fewer members and fewer interested parties.

When it comes to guns, what makes the USA different from the rest of the world? Tradition ("we've always had the 2nd A so it must be good") and lobbying ("nothing can prevent this" says only nation on earth where this regularly happens).
The compiler doesn't have to come to your home and actively haunt you. The behaviour is indeed up to the platform (by "platform" I understand "compiler + host system" or whatever is used to run the program).
Which groups of people tend to overestimate their IQ?
Why is it such a big concern? As far as I know deep fake can be recognised with solid confidence using other neural net model? It's only a matter of time this will be detected in every kind of real-time communication app if it poses some kind of a threat and it is rising. Sure, it must be developed, and it's a good thing it is done in public, so the defenders can prepare to defend on open-source material, no?
Being able to just call a bunch of named timers while cooking is pretty great.

As well as being able to say add milk to the grocery list without taking out your phone.

I haven’t much else where voice is actually better.
Ah, well I should’ve clarified. I was very, very excited about the language from about 0.4 to 1.2ish.

In that time, I was nearly obsessive in reading all the news, though I wasn’t writing any jl code at all during that time. After 1.0, I used it for a few little things here and there in my business, some basic csv munging and a few other one-off tasks. It did fine, ofc.

The claims, yeah I mean, I don’t know the parties involved personally but because we are not far apart in the social graph and I don’t need the headache this close to retirement. I love my opinions very much, but not when they involve personal controversy.

Multiple dispatch is a write-only benefit. In my line of work, I might come across different machines, different memory setups, different instruction sets, different c compilers, different latency profiles, different spoken language as documentation, etc.

I’m not a mathematician, but I clean up and leave businesses with pragmatic, clean, maintainable code after the mathematicians do their thing and move on. For me, good code is about how specifically and how clearly I can communicate an idea so that the next person (who won’t know shit about shit) can add a feature without breaking something, change a deploy, fix a small bug, update documentation, etc, without breaking things. In that regard, Julia code reads like someone’s manuscript about the issue and not a program written by a programmer.

To you, that’s desired. To me, that’s my actual worst nightmare because it means the longest mental checklist between getting onsite and leaving a finished product and getting paid.

You mention not taking all argument types, it’s just so stereotypically mathematician of an assumption that the code will just work with whatever garbage you send it.

Because maybe that function needs to run on a 32bit system somewhere, and it will fail?

Maybe some of the other methods have a bug, and you won’t notice until you use the original method with a certain type, that you hadn’t considered? Julia can’t prove this sort of thing, to my knowledge.

I’m not saying python can, necessarily, but I know that there are very strong confidence levels and that if something borks, I can arrive at the scene of the crime within a few minutes of any given stacktrace and docker image, or whatever.

I don’t mean to argue. It’s clear we disagree. That’s fine. I just can’t take Julia seriously because they treat data like math on a whiteboard, and it’s just a ridiculous way to program a computer. Like I said, it gets a lot of computing done, and a lot of people are going home paid well. It’s all good, to that end.

Edit: I likely won’t reply further, it’s really annoying to scroll back in HN to see replies without linked notifications. Be well!
Corollary: Asymmetric Justice, where you judge bad outcomes whenever they occur but only count good outcomes with good intentions, such that taking action in general becomes immoral compared to inaction. I do this a lot, as in his example about feeling bad that buying a tomato prevents someone else from having that tomato.

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/YRgMCXMbkKBZgMz4M/asymmetric...
Your guess about the airframes being booked has a ring of truth to it. I hadn't thought of that, and was wondering why radiometrics wasn't being used from the beginning.
Prevailing wage is a minimum wage the USCIS generates per job type for the H1B. You need to pay at least the prevailing wage to get an H1B for your employee. Not doing so becomes immigration fraud.

To quote Rick and Morty, "think before you talk shit"

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/62g-h1b-require...
metasploit was at one point the world's largest ruby codebase, back when it was still on SVN :)
Power usage. It is fine for stationary stuff but no chance you gonna have that had any sensible battery life. And even if you get to like a day, having to remember to put yet another device on charger every day is PITA.

I actually was building kind of monitoring screen; idea was to just leave it connected to ethernet and boot off network so it doesn't have any problems with SD durability or need any installation in case I wanted to have more than one.
Brexit happened and I'm not sure the UK tech law landscape on these topics is a lot more reassuring. But who knows.
New! ChatGPT service fee. $3.50
You're exactly proving the point GP makes, good job.
We asked the new AI to do some simple rocket science. It crashed and burned
What were the decisive victories in antiquity attributable to elephants? I feel like I’ve read countless tales of them running away or rampaging amongst their own troops but relatively few of them carrying the day.
> for die hard DF fans who know all hotkeys inside out there's little actual reason to switch to the Steam version

They made the game so much more playable it's hard to understate. We're not even talking mouse vs keyboard here. They made one of the core mechanics (labor assignment) go from something that essentially required a third party tool to manage to something that is trivial to manage in its vanilla state. Sure it took some adjustment for long-time players and some prefer the algorithms used by those custom tools, but those tools are being made available.
I stand corrected, it was v4 and not v6, yeah.

For a while they used improved B versions, what Dennis calls New B, Embryonic C and Neonatal C, regarding the language evolution.

https://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/chist.html
If this is a law in the area the police officers enforcing it aren't the main problem. They're a secondary issue stemming from government overreach.
Journal article: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.2857
This is not the title of the article, and it should be changed.

Besides, what's kph?
The best part is you get to choose from wide variety of normal looking switches, not some designers coffee break sketch of "advanced and futuristic".

Shelly seems to be more US-centric, over on EU side I've had good experiences with Sonoff ZBMINI relays - same idea, only on Zigbee connection instead of WiFi.
> Technology isn’t inevitable. It’s a choice we make.

I think it is inevitable actually. The history of humanity seems to suggest so at least.
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

- Thomas Jefferson