skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> "Discovery of content" implies to me that there is some kind of search. It implies an amount of self-directed, self-motivated activity. I would think that a PhD researcher or a programmer on stack-overflow or a person in a library is "discovering content"

This confused me until I realized that you're using "discovery" like a lawyer would:

discovery (noun)
1. The act or an instance of discovering.
2. Something discovered.
3. The compulsory disclosure to the opposing party of factual information or documents relevant to a lawsuit prior to trial.
If your database supports it, unit tests are an absolutely ideal use-case for temporary tables or global temporary tables. A global temporary table can be defined with the same schema as the correct table and will "exist" for the purpose of view/CTE definitions, but any data inserted into the table will only ever be visible from that specific thread context. The rules depend but basically either it exists until the thread is closed, or until the session calls commit, but the semantics will (theoretically) be optimized for one thread and rapid inserts/clears.

If you build your unit tests so that a thread will not commit until it's finished, or clear it before/after, it's pretty ideal for that. You can feed in data for that test and it won't be visible anywhere else.

Potentially if you scripted your table creates you could add an additional rule that GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE gets added to any other tabledefs but only for unit tests. Or just update both in parallel.

The other useful use-case I've found for this is that you can do an unlimited-size "WHERE myId IN (:1, :2 ...)" by doing a GTT expressed as "INNER JOIN myId = myGtt.myid", and this has the advantage of not thrashing the query planner for every literal sqltext resulting from different lengths of myList (this will fill up your query cache!). Since it's one literal string it always hits the same query plan cache.

I am told this has problems in oracle's OCI when using PDBs, apparently GTTs will shit up the redo-log tablespace (WAL equivalent). But so do many many things, PDBs are apparently a much different and much less capable and incredibly immature implementation that seems essentially abandoned/not a focus from what I've been told. I was very surprised having originally written that code in regular Oracle and not having had problems but PDBs just aren't the same (right down to nulls being present in indexes!).
Anyone who works from home? One of the perks is you can run errands during working hours when less people are doing it
I had high hopes that Gelsinger would be able to pull it off. But seeing this makes me think that he's getting too much pushback from other factions within Intel and the institutional investors.
> Apple Music is a better choice than Tidal and far better than Spotify.

Only if you're on an iPhone.
Creating a separate isolated environment is totally the way to go, and migrate the data from your existing database to it. This way the data turns to "dummy" data but it provides you with something to conduct testing with.
Aside: the name is virtually indistinguishable from Bittrex (https://global.bittrex.com) a crypto exchange.
If you're going to call something terrible, it's a little more productive to offer a suggestion for something better.
Heroku banned my account with several income generating projects on it with zero notice. When I called them they treated me like a criminal and like they were doing me a massive fucking favor by even talking to me. I suspect I was supposed to get email notifications leading up to the ban to take corrective action but 100% did not get anything.

For context, someone put in malicious DMCA complaints against my website. Heroku did a shit fucking job (i.e. nothing) verifying the complaints. They provided no ability to dispute that it was bullshit. I took my business elsewhere, not that they care.
Ask HN: When make a summary from articles using GTP-3
good to know! I ended up buying a ryobi battery-powered "high volume power inflator." I think it's meant for air mattresses, but it does a great job at dusting electronics.
To me, it’s a must to shower after a haircut. Getting a haircut before work would leave me with hairs on my neck or in my clothes: Always after work or on weekends
Ask HN: When make summaries from articles using GTP-3 in HN
> How do cities and states attract well paid remote workers.

To me WFH aligns the incentives exactly right in this case. You attract workers by being a good place to live. Have stuff human people care about -- parks, playgrounds, schools, restaurants, nightlife, recreation, arts, theater, music, food, yada yada. Instead of right now where the strat is to get a critical mass of well-ish-paying businesses and then everything else is extra. Communities will form based on what people do outside work which sounds like actual heaven.
Like, at home which can be anywhere? Great! Let’s do it.
Starting seeing these messages earlier this week. It also says Pro is gratis for up to 5 machines.
Is there anything preventing someone with a subscription simply pulling those patches down and putting them in a freely accessible APT repo?
There's not much context here-

Is this an EOL ubuntu release? In which case this is expected (arguable whether it's good practise or not).

If not, y'know, bugs are also a thing that happens.

Let's see how it plays out.
I love that Tidal has folders to better organize playlists. Spotify doesn't. So to me, in some ways, Tidal is much better.
For tips on breaking into product management subsribe to https://youtube.com/@everythingproduct
Yeah that neighborhood was impossible to speed like today's suburbs. Blocks were 300 ft from intersection to intersection, and no road was longer than 3 blocks. Going to my house from the main road was literally: "First left, then first right, then second left, then first right, then the third house on the left".
I wonder if people like you support anything other than the redistribution of consequences. Seems like bread and butter at this point.
Due to their stock, right?
The TV license is still in effect and not everyone has to pay it. [1]

How on earth have you obtained such obvious misinformation and why are you posting it so confidently?

[1] https://www.gov.uk/tv-licence
So I presume almost every hollywood movie trailer will be banned now?

HAHAHA of course not! Rules for thee.
Agreed. This is a very capital intensive business. They should be investing that capital into upgrading their technology. The dividend should be off the table for the next few years, at least. Paying a dividend probably made sense in the 90s and even into the early 2000s when Intel pretty much owned the whole PC CPU market. But now they're in a tough spot and the only way out is to invest that money that they're throwing out there as dividends.
> Is this an EOL ubuntu release?

No, it's happening in 22.04 to me.

> If not, y'know, bugs are also a thing that happens.

I don't think it's a bug, because what's actually happening matches what Canonical's website says is happening.
Write simply (2021)
I definitely get email reminders about subscription renewals. I can’t remember precisely if that differs for trials, but I imagine it’s just a decision by UX people, not some nefarious entity inside of Apple out to get people.
>Does a 1980's Datsun have an ECU?

of course
https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/63812-1980-280zx-e...

picture https://www.electro-tech-online.com/attachments/4-ecu-full-s... a ton of Hitachi chips, big one on top seems to be some kind of ADC.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JECS build on BOSH license using Hitachi HD46802P (Motorola 6802 clone). Here reverse engineered https://github.com/eccs-reengineering/280ZX-Turbo-ECCS

Bosh shipped analog controlled d-jetronic in 1967 based on US patents/designs from fifties https://jetronic.org/index.php/en/d-jetronic/51-history.

Afaik first mass produced digital ECU was shipped by GM in 1978 (Motorola 6802 based). Ford also shipped some Toshiba ECUs in 1979. Bosh first fully digital ECU (Intel 8051 based) was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motronic in 1979 like Datsun/Nissan. Ford went full ECU in 1983 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_8061)
How do I reconcile what? The chance that a business runs out of money before it has a chance to become profitable? That's inherent to being a business; it's like the entire reason that they fail. Sorry, try again next time — build a better business or find investors who will wait it out with you. What is the contradiction here?
The difference is every time you login into twitter and see your feed was set to algorithmic, you groan and switch it back to chronological. This app won’t let you switch it back.
Too bad it is using a CPU from 2016. At that point its competing with substantially better used hardware that is less expensive.
> Pay cuts are better than layoffs.

Unfortunately, I highly doubt that. With pay cut, comes a huge drop in morale across all the employees. Highly performers even consider leaving, and some employees leave.

After a layoff, the rest of the employees are more productive and the company gets to decide which employees to lay off (depending on business needs, comp-to-productivity, or whatever else).

> That said, investors need to take a paycut in dividends as well.

Totally agreed. As an investor and an employee, I feel sad to see my peers be laid off just so that a company can pay the same dividends and maintain earnings.
That's the thing about Spotify's (and other music streaming services) recommendation engines: they're terrible DJs.

It puts completely unrelated songs together in the same mix, be it because of different genre, mood, energy. Only human-curated playlists and albums are good to play-and-forget; but at that point why do I need Spotify at all?

I pay Youtube begrudgingly to avoid ads, I might as well use their music service which has the exact same problem, rather than paying Spotify on top.
Search any ai tool for your usecase from global ai tool directory.
Well defined identifiers don’t need comments
On the one hand, it suggests that the box industry serves as an excellent barometer for the larger economy because so much of what we buy spends some time in a box.

On the other hand, it also says:

“In addition, consumer behavior changed very quickly as we exited the extreme COVID period, resulting in more of a preference towards travel, entertainment and experience versus that of tangible goods,”

On the other other hand, I wonder how much trends like buying local and use of reusable containers impacts this, perhaps without ever being measured.
What is Ubuntu Pro and how will this affect me as a regular Ubuntu user? Linked post has no context
Technically probably not, but expect Canonical to sue you if they find out you do.
That's quite the slippery slope though.

You don't literally draw a rectangle with HTML, but you also don't tell the database's query planner how to do its job.

You're also not comparing things on equal terms. HTML isn't any kind of programming or scripting language.

If I understand you correctly, SQL would only be declarative if the user literally wrote the entire result set of the query. This would then obviate the need for SQL. The result set of a query is called "data". It's not a declarative language.

You're free to redefine terms, but as I mentioned, you're going to have a hard time finding people to agree with you.
There is a plugin with auto syntax highligting, its a but clunky to use, but it woeks okay

https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/code_blocks/100...
On what basis? Most software is GPL which has redistribution rights.
Both are true, it definitely depends on how many spoons I have when lunchtime rolls around and what the leftover situation looks like. For <$20 I can get some real food to my door async and that wins very often compared to canned/frozen.
Allegedly M-Disc optical media are good for ~1 thousand years if stored properly. This assumes you can find an appropriate optical media reader (M-Disc use a mineral layer instead of dye so you need a far stronger laser to burn the disc, but should be able to read it with a standard reader), and have support for the file systems and media formats stored on the media.

I wouldn't think ISO 9660 or JPEG would become lost knowledge in that timeframe, and presumably the tech level in the future will be high enough that reconstructing a dvd or blu-ray drive from a general understanding of the principles involved would not be insurmountable.
I had high hopes for Pat, but I think the institutional investors have been getting to him.
Prime Voice AI: AI speech software
Olohan was promoted to managing director of food, beverages, and restaurants
The thing is, these probably aren't rampant. I doubt more than 0.01% of all Windows machines have a Go or Nim binary on them.
Ubuntu Pro is a paid* subscription that Canonical offers. It affects you if you've installed any packages in universe, e.g., ImageMagick, in that you'll be running known-vulnerable versions of them unless you sign up for Pro.

* Individual users can use it for free on up to 5 machines.
No, that's not how jobs work. Comparative advantage means it's worth paying people to do a job even if you're better at it than they are, because you have more important things to do.

Hiring AIs to do something is extremely expensive. You're basically setting a warehouse of GPUs on fire.

Anyway, if it was true total factor productivity would be exploding, but it's actually kinda underperforming. (And automation almost always causes increased employment.)
If I were an Intel employee I would never accept a pay cut "justified" by the company's willingness to pay dividends. Investors get dividends when the management creates a reasonable amount of profits, not when employees have to waive their dues to do investors a favor.
What's something useful to do with neural networks?
I’m both thinking out loud, and not trying to justify the decision here.

Given that a large part of tech employee compensation is through stock, what’s the break even point between further lowering the stock price and directly lowering compensation?
Yes it’s really interesting how the quantum information folks have managed to recast known features of classical physics (second law of thermodynamics, no closed timelike curves) as “implausible computational tasks”.
Sure, and that's been the problem with the last couple of CEOs before Pat, but Pat came in expressly saying he was going to take the long view. I suspect that he's visited been by some large institutional investors who don't take the long view.
Presumably for violating the contract you agree to when you sign up for Pro. As for the GPL being supposed to block this, it doesn't seem to have stopped grsecurity from pulling the same nonsense.
This wouldn’t work in practice because you don’t have access to GPTs activations
$25 a year for me.
They're already firing thousands of employees (and thousands more contractors who don't get counted in the layoff numbers)
Where do you get the music?
Yep. And Amazon has gone as far as designing their own data center chip because Intel was selling a lackluster product for the price.
They’re accountants in my experience.
> With pay cut, comes a huge drop in morale across all the employees.

Layoffs also create huge general morale drops, greater the more the company has succeeded in the near universal practice of trying to get people to treat the company as a surrogate family.
https://www.snsnonline.com
I remember stumble upon mostly being cool web tech in action
Why people use ubuntu over debian on servers will never cease to amaze me. Ubuntu is a literal downgrade.
It’s supposed to be free for individuals with to 5 machines so it doesn’t seem like the patches will be hard to find.
That's what I thought this was, and thought they must have released a new product.
How is Intel an underdog next to AMD? I don't know many business machines running AMD.
Any privacy policy, or am I fully the product?
> it’s just a decision by UX people

No, the most profitable company in history doesn't get to play dumb. At Apple's scale, Hanlon's Razor does not apply, because there's no effective difference between incompetence and malice.
I looked but probably not hard enough.
Right?! Are people not actually using the perks of WFH? I can just tell my team, "hey I'm gonna step out for an hour, I have a hair appointment" and it's no big deal at all. When I hit a block, I can clean the apartment, start dinner, play videogames. And let me tell you, things you actually wanna do are infinitely more refreshing than "work Reddit." My productivity and energy levels have never been so well managed.
Maybe some jobs don’t require colocating, but the majority still do.

Any heavy industry, teaching, services, anything involving a lab, medicine.. working from home is not something just anyone can do.
How was Ubuntu worse than Debian on servers prior to this change?
That wait time to see your doctor is not much different in the US where we are. We may not wait as long for procedures, hard to tell, but just basic health care is not easy to get. Just glad my company provides decent health insurance.
Check out Qubes for an extreme example of this:

https://www.qubes-os.org/
So the executives are prioritizing money to shareholders over employees, which makes sense of course because the executives are of course large shareholders. I’d be curious to know if they’re cutting their option grants.
I had to think about this for a bit, and then ended up Googling it. According to Investopedia [1] the key reasons buybacks are controversial are:

> Artificial financial results: The impact on earnings per share can give an artificial lift to the stock and mask financial problems revealed by a closer look at the company’s ratios.

> Abuse: Companies can use buybacks as a way to allow executives to take advantage of stock option programs while not diluting EPS. However, there isn't much evidence supporting the widespread belief that this happens.

> Price bumps: Buybacks can create a short-term bump in the stock price that some say allows insiders to profit while suckering other investors. This price increase may look good at first, but the positive effect is usually temporary, with equilibrium regaining when the market realizes that the company has done nothing to increase its actual value. Those who buy in after the bump can then lose money.

Basically there is a greater potential for price distortion and abuse with buybacks than dividends. Of course dividends can be gamed too, but as a relatively unsophisticated buy-and-hold investor I feel a lot more confident about buying a stock with a solid yield and long history of increasing dividends than I do about buying a stock with no yield whose valuation has shot up recently and is sitting near its record high.

[1] https://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-advisors/121...
In my experience, most Japanese people are much less judgmental about these things than this seems to imply (and less so than Westerners in general). Of course, there's always a time and place for "liking what you like", but this seems a bit otakuphobia-esque.
Business Insider has been terribly clickbaity recently. Is this a recent trend? I have even seen it from CNBC. I was only curious to see why it was such a big news, and I got baited.

Laying off the head of mental health seems like a stupid decision morale wise, but the article doesn't say if they are reducing any mental wellbeing programs or benefits. There could be any number of conclusions to be drawn - from someone else taking over the department, to its not a priority.
The package in question is libjs-jquery-ui which is in the universe repository. The universe repository is explicitly community supported only and needs to be enabled as it's not on by default.

Ubuntu Pro promises 10 years of security updates to some of the packages in the universe repo.

In Redhat speak, this is like RH supporting some EPEL packages if you have a subscription.
Take a look at how we use __has_attribute in the kernel.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/lin...

That pattern allows us to gracefully support new compiler features optionally and gracefully when people upgrade to toolchains that support them.

I suspect with `..` we could do something similar with __has_feature preprocessor guards.

Whether it's these extensions or `..`, we still would need to update struct definitions. That's at least the same amount of work. If we need to update member names due to `..`, then that's even more work!

That said, the two production compilers that can build the Linux kernel already support member attributes, and compiler inserted bounds checks against immediates. It's trivial to key off an attribute to change the inserted bounds check to a runtime load of a the corresponding member (and maybe a min between that and a fixed length, for non-flexible arrays that may not have been fully initialized for instance) and check against that. With `..` I would need to add new tokens, parsing (both for the declaration, slicing, and implicit conversions), and then the codegen.

There are times where we don't care about ABI within the kernel, so I do think it makes sense to have two different extensions here (implicit fat pointers and non-ABI modifying ways of denoting existing struct members are meant to be runtime bounds). Deploying the correct variant will take careful thought I suspect.

I haven't put enough thought into converting to/from fat pointers, so I'm glad you brought that up. It's something I'll have to think about more.

My initial gut reaction to implicit conversions is that C has enough wretched implicit conversions and promotions that are error prone, but perhaps if it is such an ergonomics win...though having a fat pointer decay to a regular pointer _implicitly_ feels like what I never want to happen.
> Our classifier has a number of important limitations. It should not be used as a primary decision-making tool, but instead as a complement to other methods of determining the source of a piece of text.

So, its not good enough to use on its own, but there’s also not a description of a set of complementary measures with which it can form an adequate system? Just, “don’t use it alone, find other stuff to use with it”. I’m…underwhelmed.
The R86S might be worth a look for you.
There's no strawman here; your principles advocate allowing aggressors to commit crimes and not becoming involved. You're a disgusting person with disgusting values.
This could work for MIT, BSD and alike. But in case of GPL and other strong copyleft-licensed software - how this is supposed to work? They just can't throw some ToS over it and say "nah, you can't share it", that'd be a violation of GPL (and the only question is if there'd be a developer who would bother to sue for illegally distributing their work).
So if I'm reading sources.list correctly, universe repositories don't receive security updates from the Ubuntu team. Is it now the case that they do, as long as you've enrolled in Ubuntu Pro?

That makes it sound as if Canonical has taken some kind of responsibility for making these packages secure at a cost for more than five devices.
I don't think Red Hat has ever said anything like "A known-vulnerable version of this package is free. We did the work of making a security patch for it, but to get that, you have to pay." for any of their releases prior to EOL.