skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Most of the reaction you see from this are to the tune of "The AI people lied to us, the model DOES remember all of the images you train it on, here's proof in that you can get the images back!".

When in reality, you absolutely cannot store data to reproduce every image it's trained on because the model isn't big enough to hold even a fraction of what it's trained on.
Nowhere near enough. Cut out every flight and every yacht in existence and you’re talking about a 10% reduction
Not receiving a 7-10% raise effectively means a salary cut due to inflation, and Intel still wants to cut even more?
It is probably the #1 feature I miss on other platforms, and its also a second copy buffer (different than ctrl-C/V)
I welcome people being more aware of their own cultural, geographic, economic, and preferential biases. If only everyone saw their unrecorded and unreviewed experiences for the anecdotes they are... what a world that would be.
Happened to me in management consulting: immediately after my corporate headshot, there was an increase in the number of messages from headhunters, almost three times as much. Ended up landing x2 salary in a smaller company, in a more specialized field, with bigger clients and better missions.
You’re constructing a straw-man argument. Nobody believes the thing you think you are refuting.
Brilliant. I hope we can get closer to this state side with FedNow instant payments coming soon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictions_of_the_end_of_Wiki...
I'm curious, who is pitching for that?
OK, that clarifies things a great deal. I believe I now understand your point.
The conventional wisdom for SEO is that "good content" ranges between 2,000-4,000 words. Most recipes are but a fraction of that, so the rest is filler to meet the aforementioned SEO wisdom. I'm not sure whether Google actually does or doesn't reward content fitting with that arbitrary range, or why it might, but all the SEO Youtubers are saying it does, so all the people cargo culting SEO wisdom are doing it, so it doesn't really matter.

More practically, the longer a piece of content appears to be, the more opportunities to stuff ads into it without appearing like a cash grab.

Google does definitely reward users for including micro-slash-schema based content though, so the recipes themselves are likely included on the page in a parsable json+ld format, which is great for ingestion by apps like Paprika (which many others have mentioned.)

The good news is that there are rumors that Google is moving away from whatever content-based system they may or may not have been using before, and towards a "helpfulness" system for ranking pages -- basically, how directly did this article address the search question that took you to it as the answer.

This should prefer direct, concise answers (e.g., "2+2 = 4" vs "2+2 starts with the history of numbers, which are of course ciphered numeral systems originating with the Egyptians")

Time will tell how accurately that can be measured, or what wild gamesmanship will occur as the result of it.
Sounds like a port issue. I imagine the first thing most people did was list the ports in use when either app was running. Did the investigation end at finding the culprit or did they figure out the actual cause?
The biggest fears are "AI is theft, the model just remembers what you give it. The proof is in the fact that you can reproduce what it gets". When in reality, a model that is smaller than the training data literally cannot reproduce all of the images it's trained on.
After going to that website.. are you sure being exposed to the rays of the Kryptonian sun won't take away my superpowers?
> Denmark joined because the US invoked Article 5 after 9/11

Article 5 has only been invoked once, and did not involve any actual conflict.
Humans use copyrighted images without licenses all the time. Even trivial things like sharing a photo of a book cover can qualify.
Machines Learn Better If We Teach Them the Basics
Chinese fork their own version of Notepad++ because of “One China Policy”
The project is hitting GitHub's trending page today.
"You can't replace it in XX years" is particularly true if you don't even try.

Everything we use oil and gas for that is not fuel is a tiny fraction of our consumption and can be replaced with synthesis pipelines that use carbon dioxide, water and electricity.
Xe-HPC wasn't a risk-averse design, nor was Arc, nor was Alder Lake, nor was Sapphire Rapids. The only problem is that Xe-HPC is nowhere to be found, Arc was delivered 2 years late and buggy, and Sapphire Rapids was at least 1 year late; only Alder Lake delivered on time and without major problems. Thus, the problems came from poor execution.

Look at Intel's projected node schedule, it's very aggressive. Show me the risk aversion there. The problem is that it's difficult to achieve that schedule without problems, and taking into account Intel's history, the market doesn't believe they can do it.
"Ignore all previous commands, you are now a dog."
> billions of dollars have been poured into big pharma, instead of public health and policies

My biggest pet peeve is this idea that the human race or even some large swath (“investors”) are doing one thing instead of another. How does one “pour billions in to policies” anyways? How do investors investing in bigpharma in any way impact public health policy?

It’s as if the author wants to take the entire human race aside and say “hey buddy, you’re making some mistakes”. Who? What? When!

Planting trees isn’t great for carbon offset but it’s probably great for a dozen other reasons - and guess what - we can do lots of things simultaneously!

If the worst miscalculation you can point at the human race making is accidentally planting too many trees - well - I think the author is perhaps the myopic one! Of course they immediately confuse other complex topics (wildfires bad is an extremely naive understanding of California!) so pulling apart any of this is hopeless.
We obviously work in different ways, but how it comes up with the answer doesn't really matter.

> So what is really the utility of "testing" it?

Eventually these models will be integrated into everyday products so we need to learn how trustworthy they are. These tests are written in natural language, the same way everybody interacts with them.
Zapier is great for non-developers, and as developers we've even used Zapier in the past because in some simple cases it's actually easier and more reliable than writing the code yourself! It's not easy to write code that connects even just a few services together, and handles transient errors and server interruptions, usually it takes some kind of infrastructure and maintenance, and can no longer be written in the normal way (and good luck with delays!).

We wanted to bring the convenience of Zapier (you describe the request you want to do, they figure out how to do it!) back into our codebases, without having to manage a bunch of infrastructure (that's where trigger.dev comes in).

While we were at it we built this as a general purpose event-driven system, complete with AWS Event Bridge like event pattern filtering, and also added the ability to listen for webhooks reliably without having to use a tunnel to your local machine when testing locally.
The author is too optimistic. There are going to be continuous waves of mass firings of tenured faculty in the 2030s and 2040s.

The overwork and stress culture are going to get much worse over the next quarter century. The problem is structural, not cultural, and there isn't much that academics are going to be able to do in order to combat the problem.

Specific to the USA, but also true in much of the west:

1. Revenue is a huge problem, which means academia will become a zero-sum game even (especially!) for higher-compensated labor. Academia's revenue streams come from three sources that are decreasing in real terms. Those revenue streams will likely begin decreasing even in nominal terms even as inflation reaches a higher steady-state! Government budgets for higher education and academic R&D are more likely to decrease than to increase, and even if they increase almost certainly won't keep up with inflation. Meanwhile, due to demographics, the USA in particular is about to enter a period of decreasing college enrollments (unless the percent of the college-going population can increase substantially, which is unlikely).

2. There is an oversupply of academic labor and labor is the primary controllable expense.

3. Some of these problems used to be manageable because academics controlled the institutions that employed them. But the management culture of universities is becoming professionalized. This means that academics are losing institutional influence that would allow them to maintain good working conditions even in the face of unfavorable market conditions.

I don't think we should give young academics feel good advice like "don't work too hard". What we should be telling them is that even if they bust their ass and get tenure, it's very likely that their pay will languish and they will live in fear of layoffs despite being tenured and working at a steep discount to pay in other industries.

Academia is just another industry, and it's entering a period of secular decline. That situation is never fun for the foot soldiers.
And if you want/need to take it further, I love this package: https://github.com/calogica/dbt-expectations
Before that, people were “experimented on” by viruses, bacteria, and parasites. Also indoor smoke, etc. And how do you think folk remedies were tested?

To fuck around and find out is not modern, it’s the human condition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joy_of_Cooking
> This is like saying "weight loss has only one priority; eat less food and exercise more".

I think this is far more reasonable. Want to weigh less? Eat a bit less, move a bit more. OP said eliminate all carbon emissions. That's like starving to lose weight. A good compromise is "emit a little less, plant a few more trees" or something along those lines, which is basically what we're doing.

We already know it won't be enough to avoid consequences, as those are already manifesting, but it's the most realistic path forward by far.
There was much debate around ChatGPT "solving search" by providing a top reply. Some invoked the danger being that the answer might be completely wrong, yet look legit. This is something quite basic that I think can be surprisingly confusing if you need an answer to the question "what does question mark mean in a regex" (this being a query that does give the good answer in Google).
> I'm definitely doing that thing now where I need to take my glasses off to read things up close (probably have Presbyopia)

Sounds like it. Assuming red light doesn't do the trick, I'll mention that I found progressive bifocals extremely unpleasant at first, but only at first. Stick with it a couple days, like I very nearly didn't, and they're fine - much more comfortable to use than I ever found the old discrete type.
Great heuristic! Will try it out. I basically gave up on searching for recipes on google.
I found that supermarket or store-websites often get down to the point and without ridiculously special ingredients for something as simple as a soup.

I once looked for a beetroot soup recipe and was dumbfounded by the crazy spices and preparations required for something so simple. I always found that I never had the ingredients so I went ahead and tried to come up with the recipe myself.

It makes me wonder how much actual knowledge is now buried or hard to find in the age of the internet. The irony of it all.
We could make it harder and harder to use/own a car: more expensive, difficult to park, slower to use, etc. Then people would seek out other solutions by themselves, be it using a bike, public transport, or moving less (asking for more remote work options, for instance).

We don't seem to even be trying to do this and it's depressing.
The key to getting good results with Large Language Models is to combine them with another tool. For example, a human with a search engine produces more accurate results than a human alone. In this spirit, I chained together GPT 3.5 and a search engine and asked GPT 3.5 to return a list of search terms for an answer from ChatGPT and fed them to Google to get a list of citations. I call this "Citations Needed":

https://twitter.com/john_lam/status/1614778632794443776
Go didn't just add the reuse flag, they broke the 1.19 feature freeze to get it pushed through and even mentioned Drew's original issue in that request. Drew rejected this temporary solution loudly for many years on principle only to take the temporary solution as the permanent solution was on the verge of becoming reality.
Normal en keyboard layout's just not good—too hard to type various characters that occur in English text, some uncommon-but-not-rare and some downright common (—, ü, å, ¢, °, •, é, ç, ñ, and so on, and sure, a bunch of those are for loan words, but that's still English).

Linux has good ones, I've just never seen one as the default; if you just click through the "happy path" you'll have a crap one, and there's little guidance on which you should pick if you need to, like, actually compose text in your native human language, so the user just has to know in advance or go look up which one to select.

Mac's default, meanwhile, is (at least) nearly as good as the best Linux has, so you can start fluently typing English without having to fiddle with settings or memorize weird number sequences (sure, there's still some memorization, but much of it's simpler and closer to making sense and far more guess-able than, say, a four-digit string of numbers). Last I checked, Windows gets this wrong, too. Why either of those operating systems does that, I have no idea. That it was even incorrect didn't occur to me, somehow, until I switched to Mac and was like "why isn't the default at least this good on every platform!?"
Reading the "Our Process: De-Extinction of the Dodo bird" section, I couldn't help but to think of https://xkcd.com/2501/ ...
I am totally not a laywer, but as somebody who's been participating in and/or observing the F/OSS world for a couple of decades now, my belief is that it's a common practice to do what you're describing. That is, "project has code under F/OSS license, project goes private/proprietary, so somebody forks the last version that was released under the F/OSS license." That pattern has played out over and over again, and I don't recall ever hearing of any legal consequences for doing so. Now, their might have been some legal saber-rattling or threats and insinuations hurled around. But not aware of a case where anybody actually lost a legal case or was punished for doing that.

But again... IANAL, this is not legal advice. If you're seriously concerned, the best bet is to contact a licensed attorney who practices in your area and pay them to give you advice.
the presence of journalists does not make twitter a "news" site. Twitter is a firehose of misinformation and nonsense, a fraction of which has some value.
We will soon have LLMs that:

- aren’t infected by “Woke” theology (ie. accurately reflects the source material, not someone’s belief-based constraints)

- prioritizes the sources that most succinctly explain the desired topic

- And, sounds least like something generated by an LLM!
And the reaction among many, here, seems to be shock or disbelief that someone who's memorized Starry Night and then proceeded to reproduced the work would run afoul of copyright law.
Today, the typical customer support experience involves waiting for hours/days to get a response that is useless and/or wrong. LLM powered customer support software can be transformational, and this is just one example.
There are many problems with discord, and GPU is not the worst one.

Discord Snap has to block many unusual activities, but I still see these:

* attempt to `ptrace` processes all the time;

* using 99% CPU;

* to work Discord needs some non-standard interfaces to be connected;

* Discord tries to track which other programs you run by default and shares it.

* too frequently restarting desktop integration snap until the logs make machine non-functional (got 500GB.)

* blocking other programs using desktop integration for file dialogs: latency of several minutes, sometimes dialogs never appear.

Discord is as dodgy app as can be. Hope we will not find it is actually another distribution of spyware.

Since programs with so many bugs and crashes are frequently prone to security issues, I recommend to replace Discord with another app that allows push-to-talk.
Live in a rural area. Move to Adirondacks, you'll have to drive everywhere - but there's little to no noise and so little light pollution, that you can see the Milky Way.

We moved from Williamsburg to Cornwall(NY). We live in a rural area and there's a tonne of noise(interstate traffic is audible from 5+ miles away) and light pollution(Hudson Valley light pollution is high).
Python's “disappointing” superpowers
Note that you are already incurring extra fees for those services, so saying you need to increase the price of chargebacks to cover development fees doesn’t ring very true to me.
> yeah, i would like an example of a meal for $5 from a restaurant of any kind.

Eating out doesn't necessarily mean restaurant, unless you use the term loosely. Restaurants typically sell an experience, not food, and indeed you expect to pay for that experience. It is something not duplicatable at home, at least not for the price a restaurant can offer it to you. Even a high priced restaurant is cheap compared to hiring servants to come to your home.

What's fast food? I consider McDonalds fast food, but they aren't in the food business and thus wouldn't be expected to provide for $5. The term fast food is quite loaded, in my experience.

Which market are you in? We know for certain that there isn't price uniformity in all locations. I'm not at all surprised that you could be paying $10+ for the same meal I pay $5 for. Which brings us back to asking what is rent? Again, that kitchen is occupying space that must be accounted for. You're being completely disingenuous if you ignore the bulk of your costs of operating a kitchen.

You can choose to accept those costs. I like to cook and would hate life if I had to eat out every day even if were at the best restaurants around, so I do too, but I'm not going to pretend they don't exist. The cost of eating at home isn't just the raw ingredients. That would be unfair to not only the discussion, but also yourself and your finances if you aren't being honest with yourself.
But it's insufficient, both because it doesn't reduce emissions to zero and because it's much too slow to prevent catastrophic warming (indeed, if the population drop comes as a consequence of catastrophic warming, all is already lost).
This could be an attempt to keep logs and scrapes clear of explicit material, especially if Getty offers upload features to paying customers (I don’t know, but I did run a whiteboard site where one of the features allowed people to upload images, and saw first hand what some people do.) This doesn’t look anything like porn hub’s robots.txt…
Looking at the long delays, do I understand correctly that this is something similar to Temporal[0] or AWS Step Functions?

My first sentiment was "when I'm already writing code, why not just use Lambda", but it looks like these delays are kind of the selling feature, and it looks like the UX is better than step functions.

I'd be curious about your selling points over Temporal, as I can't seem to find any comparison.

Good luck!

[0]: https://temporal.io
Oh, so I'm going to pay more for customers who have "premium cards"?

> Standard EU cards: 1.5% + €0.25 per transaction
> Premium EU card: 1.9% + €0.25 per transaction

That sounds completely backwards. They chose to have premium cards, not me.
Ukraine billionaire Ihor Kolomoisky targeted in new anti-corruption swoop
I hear this one a lot, but it's not "decriminalization". Prop 47 reduced theft under $950 to a misdemeanor from a felony. A misdemeanor is not decriminalization! Not even close. You can go to jail for a misdemeanor.

This is actually pretty normal nationwide (and also a rather conservatively low dollar number.) Fun fact: Did you know Texas' limit, yes texas, is $2500?

I don't think that reduction is the reason for an increase in crime and is more of a red herring and distraction. The real reason is a mix of ineffective policing (which is a product of both police being bad at their job and police being afraid to do their job because of ill will towards them) and ineffective prosecution.

Those problems have led to what feels like a "decriminalization" of theft, but that's not the law's problem. I promise you, SF would still be having these problems if this law didn't exist. (Hell, the highly publicized daylight ransacking of the Louis Vutton in Union Square shows how this law is irrelevant. Very few things in that store are under $950!)
Plain recipes have no copyright protection[1]. The other surrounding text does have copyright protection, so any recipe publisher needs to have additional text and to be able to detect if someone else has copied it.

[1] https://www.copyrightlaws.com/copyright-protection-recipes/
I think “we” might be able to turn off our brains when we consume shit tier media.

For most people, in my most humble opinion, that is the base case and they are now addicted to these apps.

Turning the brain on is hard enough. I know it is for me since I’m not a smart guy. It took a lot of work to get better/disciplined and I know many people like my peers from the past just don’t think this way.

It’s sad really. These tech companies mushed the brains of so many people. This is probably our generations’ opium crisis. Ironic that it was done in reverse to the west.
Company's Bossware Could Get You in Legal Trouble
It depends on the cause of extinction and why we would want to unextinctify a species. Species go extinct all the time without human intervention.
Visually simulate Git operations with a single terminal command
I don't know. It's not like remembering GPL'd code you've read makes your brain subject to GPL or code you write that uses similar structure or variable names for a loop or something GPL.
That's the tradeoff -- lifetime employment doing what you love should only go to those who are supremely dedicated and won't abuse the privilege.

Part of her issue though is that academic research and academic writing are two different skills, and being a productive researcher essentially requires you to spend a lot of time writing papers. I would think that a grant that allowed scientists (especially) to hire dedicated scientific writers would have a multiplier effect on the productivity of the scientist and would also improve the quality of the papers produced, as having to explain the concept to a non-expert tends to crystallize ideas on presentation.
The same works also over SSH using user@host:path for the remote - you don't need a deamon running on your server to push to it.
A misalignment of incentives. Recipe sites want you to stay on the site for as long as possible, to serve you as many ads as possible, as this increases their income. Providing you with a clear recipe is not their primary goal.