skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Some, agreed. Most? How are you quantifying that; feelings and anecdotes from your own experience or some hard data?
Senator Calls on Apple and Google to Ban TikTok in App Stores
https://www.anyquestions.ai/videoExternal
Project Description:
A way to ask questions to/on any Youtube video(uses whisper + smart embeddings), and get a quoted response.

What do you want to be tested:
Does it answer questions well for you, for the video you added? Ideal for 10-30 min educational/podcast style videos.

Contact Info:
supportthought ... anyquestions.ai
Is there a similar utility for OSX or Linux?
The single cut wire will only be better at its resonant frequency. The TV antennas are designed to cover their entire bands.
Listen, there’s an unfortunate lesson to be learned here.

Job hoppers earn a lot more, over time. It sounds like it’s time to go. Perhaps there’s another department you could move to, as well? Otherwise, time to spend a weekend or two on Leetcode and then wrangle up some interviews.

I suspect something else is going on here, and without further details, I have to assume that leaving to a higher-paying job would be best for you.
I am fine with them having massive profits, but no government bailouts, no government interventions on their behalf, no stop losses for oil spills.

They should have a massive cash position as insurance, no stock buybacks and then complaining they have no money to continue operations.
> if you helped develop it, you're responsible for it

FOSS comes without warranty and liability. Read the license.
There are 2 possibilities here:

1) The police have no real criminals to arrest but need to do something to justify their existence. So they're harassing people over things that not only aren't crimes but are examples of good parenting that teaches kids to be independent. In this case, "defund the police" would genuinely be justified as they're clearly overfunded.

2) The police are refusing to do their job and arrest real criminals. Instead, they are harassing people over things that aren't crimes because those things are "unsafe" due to the refusal of police to do their job. In this case, the police need to be reformed so that they do what they're supposed to do.

Either way, the police should stick to arresting murderers, rapists and thieves to protect the fundamental freedom of decent people who respect the rights of others to use a public street whenever they want without fear of becoming a victim of violent criminals or of the police. Since this is literally why the government exists according to social contract theory (which the US was founded upon), the refusal of the government's police to do their job or the choice of the government's police to oppress others out of boredom is a breach of the social contract that makes said government illegitimate and no better morally than a street gang or mafia.

Even if the laws are vague, enforcing a vague law in a way that is clearly evil and oppressive is unacceptable because the core principle of the American legal system is that our fundamental rights are the supreme law and supersede any laws that infringe upon them. The right to walk on a public street is clearly protected by the 9th Amendment as it is so obviously a basic right that there was no need for the 1st Congress to enumerate it. Thus infringing on such a right in the name of "safety" is flagrantly unconstitutional.
> The stewardship claim bit seems maybe a bit overstated considering they weren't able to secure an object the size of a button leading to it "falling off the back of a truck"

As I understand it, this wasn't fuel, it was part of an instrument used by a mining company to measure the density of iron ore. The mining company (or a contractor depending on what you read) are the ones that lost it, the Australian government agency just came in to help find it.
I feel like fundamentally altering the nature of free speech on the web by giving the US government authority to directly regulate it, coerce speech and render most forms of moderation de facto illegal is overkill if the problem is some Reddit mods being a bit power-trippy.
> crowded public transport with stinky homeless people

Crowded probably means it's popular.

And the presence of stinky homeless people and people who might avoid them means people from multiple walks of life.

It sounds like public transit in Prague works!
> Maybe C allows a systems-defined behaviour to be implemented as undefined behaviour

C standard distinguishes undefined behavior, unspecified behavior and implementation-defined behavior. The first is invalid and inconsistent, the second is valid and inconsistent, the third is valid and consistent (in scope of implementation).

It is rather hard to require invalid but consistent, as the platform itself may produce inconsistent behavior in invalid cases. So what some people want is something like - "be no more inconsistent that would be naive implementation on given platform", but that is both vague and not really useful. And while some of these undefined-based optimizations seems egregious, some are necessary in order to have reasonably performant code (e.g. keeping variable values in registers instead of propagating them from/to memory after each step).
American moment
This has nothing to do with the new paid-only API. This specific API (full history search for the past month) has been paid for years, at those price points. cf https://blog.twitter.com/developer/en_us/topics/tools/2017/i...
Reason, like most outlets, is mostly untrustworthy in what they choose to cover: they're not going to put time into writing a piece about something that happened unless they can tie it back to their preferred policies. But, like most outlets, what they write about each particular instance is technically true and usually not misleading.
Japan's conveyor belt sushi industry takes a licking from an errant customer
Gated neighbourhoods and at some level suburbs that are simply unwalkable for everyone.
Agree, there’s a lot of bias, including proximity bias. For example, research shows real world judges tend to be more kind after lunch break, oscillate between hard/soft rulings, etc.
definitely not, but to reply to tens of comments over the span of hours with such devotion ?
This is about class, not luck, except in the narrow sense that being the child of affluence is luck.
We certainly need decentralized systems that cannot be controlled by EU, US, or any government/entity.

Privacy is a human right. We probably all know that they will show reasons like "fighting terrorism", "preventing national threats" or "hunting down child pornography" etc, whereas the real motivation is to control people's freedom of speech and communication even though they will 100% deny it.

Anyone who is really into something illegal will use something alternative anyway.

This will only hurt people actually fighting for their rights, and this needs to stop.
Finance means different things to different people. Are we talking about trading "finance" (including high frequency trading), investment banking "spreadsheet" finance, consumer or corporate "database" finance or maybe even (the horror, the horror) "defi" cryptofinance?

What is true is that finance in almost all its guises is a world apart in terms of information technology. Closed and proprietary, ultra expensive and arcane, highly regulated etc., it is an information technology branch that evolved separately and it shows.

Whether that will remain so is an interesting question. So called "fintech" has been a thing for a while. E.g. whatsapp is famously built on erlang, so if Meta wants to turn it into a super-app (the "Asian way") you will have a de-facto application in "consumer" mobile/payments finance.
And perfectly translates to: Better dangerous liberty than quiet servitude.

Not sure why you needed to make such an awkward rough translation when the concepts are clear, the idiom known and the sentence so short in the target language, which is the language of the author as well, thus sharing bias in its latin...

But I think this sentence is itself dangerous in its shortness, it almost makes you believe it's a discrete dichotomy rather than, as usual, a loooong gradient between two extreme, with orthogonal concerns adding to it to make it a zigzag. Better very rich in a quiet dictatorship than middle class in a chaotic old democracy, for instance. Or better poor in a clientelist theocracy than poor in an industrial dictatorship.

It doesn't really make sense in the end, since freedom and servitude are not related to danger or safety. You can have all together, at different time or degree, for different people and geographies, regarding different slice of concern (freedom is so so vague, for instance).

"Better have what you can tolerate for what you can afford, than something unaffordable or untolerable", is probably more interesting to understand the compromises real people make everyday, but I guess, so obvious we prefer to dream of a dichotomy :D
Why? You're freeloading. Pay for the service you use. It's as simple as that.
I disagree that it is completely unpredictable. If it is a read operation, dereferencing an invalid pointer on every normal system will either return data with an unspecified value or will raise a low level exception that may be caught.

Since a compiler cannot predict in all cases in advance whether a pointer is invalid it should be required to compile a pointer dereference the same way in all cases, i.e. emit the same code regardless of whether it has determined the pointer is invalid or not. Otherwise it effectively emits random code depending on how the optimizer is feeling.

Non-deterministic behavior for the same operation on the same values in the same program is not very helpful behavior, whenever and to the degree it can be avoided.
>n from bloated batteries within the year.

Is this from the battery being on the charger constantly? I remember having a similar problem years ago. I thought most devices now would manage charging by letting it drain a bit automatically. At the time though they didn't so I for my continually connected devices I just used simple plug timers that cut it off for a few hours a couple times a day.
Health startup from Sweden. Founders include Daniel Ek of Spotify fame.
Stay there, do nothing, take the paycheck and work on yourself:
- brush up on your skills
- start / contribute to a few projects, create a portfolio (I don't know what's your work experience)
- start applying for jobs <- maybe I should have started with this.

You owe nothing to that company, at the end of the day you're just one name in someone's Excel file, the whole "family at work" trend is something awful that should not have been born, so you better get out of that.

Good luck!
This would suggest that trend is reversing: https://nleomf.org/memorial/facts-figures/officer-fatality-d...
I agree. The internet is pretty dead. Most people don’t explore any more, they just want to hang out on a handful of popular sites owned by big tech corporations and that means walking on eggshells and self policing yourself.
It didn’t require approval from the FAA as the flight plan was filed in class G (uncontrolled) airspace below 14,000 feet.

Might have been a bit of a trip to fly in your Cessna and see a 747 flying down there though.
You’re leaving out the part where the police got COS involved who then harassed the family for months. As others have mentioned, they’d have no ability to sue for the actions of the officers unless there was existing case law about almost the exact situation. Qualified immunity protects officers who do stupid shit like this.
Toddlers do not do this in Japan. People deeply misunderstand this show.

It's carefully monitored and setup. The kids don't know it. They are genuinely doing the things on their own. But it's not like the parents then rely on the kids to go do those things independently after the show.

They are more independent at a young age. But you don't see toddlers walking around Japan unattended to shops.
Labor is an individual characteristic which happens to increase in skill. A person good at building cabins can have a nice cabin.

The gig economy is a set of relationships between the state of problems and pay. It pressures workers with the fewest skills to successively solve the same problem.
Bring on the personal nukes!
> Deciding that one's life is all about luck is a miserable way to live. It means one has no agency, no choice, no way to make one's life better. Because it's all luck, that means there is no point in trying. The outcome of this is self-fulfilling - misery.

Regardless of the effects of luck, I should point out how far from scientific observation this is. One can examine the evidence of, as this article says, luck, in society. Or, one can talk about magical thinking, and if one doesn't believe some received hegemony it will lead to misery. It sounds close to Christian fundamentalism - believe in the received divine word of the Bible or suffer eternally.

The evidence based scientific method has less value in observing human society than in observing the orbit of planets and such, for a variety of reasons. The picture gotten from social science is less clear than from natural science. It is better than the alternative though.

If one observed society, and the class structure of society, and the forces of production and relations of production - and the changes to the forces of production and resulting changes to relations of production - one would have an evidence based observation of
society. Including the luck of being born into one class or the other.

We can look at Mark Zuckerberg, who went to the Phillips Exeter high school (current yearly tuition - $47000 a year and up). His company bought Instagram for $1 billion, founded by Kevin Systrom who went to Middlesex high school (current yearly tuition - $55000 a year and up). We can then look at people who did not pay $47000 for their freshman year in high school (or its mid 1990s equivalent).

> None of my friends believes their lives are all about luck. They all believe they have agency, and are constantly taking responsibility for their lives and acting accordingly.

I'm sure Zuckerberg and Systrom believe they have agency - I believe they have agency. I'm sure when Bill Gates and Paul Allen left the Lakeside prep school they had agency.

These are in fact people who were upper middle class and actually went out and worked. Plenty of heirs inherit their billions, live as "rich kids of Instagram" as shall their kids.

Or you can take the advice if this poster - forget evidence in the world and engage in magical thinking or face misery.

In fact my experience is the opposite in my cohort. We see luck of birth and class structure as bearing on relations if production. My friends are fun to be around in a manner smarmy, entitled trust fund kids are not fun to be around.
Dividends are not automatically treated as capital gains, but in this situation, its possible they would be considered "qualified". The company being formed in the US, the dividends being paid out to US share holders, and the shareholders holding the stock for at least 60 days (120 days in some circumstances).

This really only applies to C-Corps as well, and then you run into the Double Taxation of C-Corp income and pay a 21% tax rate at the corporation, then additional capital gains on the dividend income.

BUT dividends would be tax free up to around $80k of income (any income (salaries, 1099, etc., also assuming married), then they would be taxed at 15% - 25% above that, but do not forget, the corporation has already paid 21%.

So optimizing for qualified-dividend-only income requires a LOT of forethought, and either accepting a lower income (since the benefit maxes out at $80k total income), or paying 15-25% + 21% for a 36-46% tax rate on your dividends.
Im trying to understand why you made these points, I think you misunderstood what you replied to.

He is saying you cant buy personal satisfaction, not that it has no effect on money earned.

PS - Maybe Im confused, can someone correct me?
US constitution can be changed in theory. Hardly so in practice.
Honeylove (https://www.honeylove.com) | REMOTE

Senior Analytics Engineer: https://boards.greenhouse.io/honeylove/jobs/5486505003

Honeylove is a YC company and Lightspeed-backed DTC startup that designs and manufactures functional and stylish garments for women. We are profitable and were recently featured by The New York Times as one of the fastest-growing shapewear disrupters.
Mochi – Spaced repetition made easy
QOI is only 8-bit depth (per channel) so it's a no-go for me. But interesting, yes.
I do not think so, Swedens population has a history of rejecting mass surveillance ideas and lot's of privacy advocating stuff has come from Sweden like Mullvad and The Pirate Bay.

Anyway, it is way easier for a citizen to affect your local politician rather than some other random countries politicians that don't care about you.
Oh interesting, could you recommend any dishes that use it well? There's quite a sizable Chinese population where I live, so I can probably find it prepared authentically enough :)

To be honest I never saw much effort going into preparing it. It was just sliced, hollowed out, and then fried. I'm not sure if there's a way to tone down the bitterness, but the only justification for its inclusion I got was "it's healthy" or "it's an antioxidant".
It's well worth a watch to see how small kids act when they think they're not being observed. And also for the hilarious footage of how oblivious they (mostly) are of the swarms of camera people running in front of and after them...
Mobile SSO has already been broken on Twitter for a few months. I’d begrudgingly pay for SSO for my app.
Well sure but you could be more clear.

Block parameters, implicit parentheses for certain method/function calls, uppercase significance, symbolic significance for brackets.
Seems like short-term work, though. As soon as this becomes common (which appears to be, oh, right about now), what little value the busywork documents still had drops the remaining distance to zero.
I've been using ChatGPT to respond to GitHub tickets.

For users who don't bother reading the documentation, don't want to try anything by themselves and want personal assistance, it works wonderfully.
That's entirely untrue.

I wanted to quip that you were making an oversimplification but that's just categorically false.
Even if the EU parliament passes a neutered bill, it is going to be lose. Some politicians seem to have inane will (and lobby money) to pass these laws no matter what, including in bit by bit in smaller pieces and partial defeats.
> I am pretty sure that these services will be provided soon by large companies and OpenAI. They are generic enough to have wide market, and many of these companies already have expertise in them.

Well, content moderation on your already existing venue (internet board, discord or whatever) can't be taken away, really. Is a sentiment indicator would be implemented into e.g. TradingView.com, it couldn't be copied either, because most subscribers are in for the main application. It would just be a small feature to justify upselling or whatever.

> Why unethical?
I'm specifically talking about content generation without disclosure. Imo it's fine to generate content as long as you clarify it for the reader that they are reading a text generated by AI. This is also in line with OpenAI's terms of service: "The role of AI in formulating the content is clearly disclosed in a way that no reader could possibly miss, and that a typical reader would find sufficiently easy to understand."

https://openai.com/api/policies/sharing-publication/#content...
We're in agreement. Work hard, advance your interests, and take the big wigs down a peg when you're good and strong. All the groups you mention (in a US context) did this and it worked out both for them and for everyone else (except the slaveholding planter/Yankee trader classes who used to run the country, and are now basically extinct -- though not completely so).
I don't think you need to go that far. Mainstream news like 60 Minutes will always feature some sort of terror porn.
Yes, but it's easier to influence politicians in your country than in the EU.
It's easier to influence politicians in your county council than in your country.
It's easier to influence politicians in your town hall than in your county council.
Passing any kind of a constitutional change in the US is by design a herculean task, you don't even need gun industry lobbying against changes.
PS5 Beta Introduces Discord Voice Chat
Skeptic yes, but OP passed hard judgement. If OP would have speculated or suggested a possible cause, that would be healthy skepticism. OP is dripping with bias and preconceived notion.
I don't know the quote, I was just translating the Latin for people.

I have to say though, since you come off as quite rude: It doesn't "perfectly translate" to any single thing in English.
None of that changes that the relationship is fundamentally exploitative. You dont need to lie, cheat or otherwise mislead people to exploit them - it seems much easier if you can offer them a deal that is genuinely compelling compared to their other options.

I'm genuinely sorry to tell you this because it seems to bother you a lot. I dont think it needs to though - "a lot of people that were blind can now see" can shoulder an awful lot of criticism.

You've been asking for alternatives throughout this comments sections which I admire, but I think you are also assuming that either better approached exist or that the inability for youtube royalty to help people without exploiting them means that they cannot be exploiting them, and neither really holds.

Consider a hypothetical ideal company town - whose existence was practically predicated on exploiting workers - where you have hired a really excellent medical team and people are getting a level of care that they couldnt access before. You might ask similar questions that you have been - how else do you propose to provide this benefit, why is it bad if everyone agrees to it, etc - but that still wouldnt change that the nature of the relationship was exploitative.

I don't think comparisons to a company town would be fair overall, but I think it does a fair job surfacing the sticking point about exploitation.
Some of those who work forces, are the same that burn crosses

Every American should understand that the police are not your friends. They exist to "protect and serve" those in power, and you're not that person. That's what being a police state is all about. A seven and nine year-old walking together to Dunkin' Donuts resulting the in the arrest of their father is a symptom of our police state. The fact that neighbors can "sic the law" on one another and the fact that "swatting" has become a verb is a symptom of our police state.

Getting back to this story and adding my own "get off my lawn" anecdote, when I was a kid every kid in the neighborhood walked to school. Even the five year-old kindergartners, like I was at one time. Oh sure my mom walked me the first couple of times to ensure I knew the route and that was it. Some kids had to walk two miles! We didn't even get a break for inclement weather! We had to walk in rain, snow and ice. We also had to cross a four-lane arterial thoroughfare! The horrors! And all this was in a big city! In all those years not a single kid was grabbed.
Pretty cool to see completely GPT-3 written cover letters!

A while ago I made an application that uses semantic sentence embeddings to identify which gaps in skills you have relative to a job description; let me know if it might be of interest to you to include that information in prompts on your site: www.revision.ai/CV
they were initially concerned it would lodge in a knobby truck tire's treads and be carried off the known path, or so i read.
Do you have proof for such a claim?
Another instance of the fat cats in Washington doing the bidding of Big Fig!