skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I can’t help but feel bad for the kids in this situation.

I feel worse for the kids whose parents don't care and have all their information collected before they're old enough to know better. They're handing children chromebooks and letting google collect their kid's test scores so they can sort children into 'smart' and 'dumb' buckets before they're out of primary school, letting youtube and tiktok babysit them the way previous generations did with television, making them carry cell phones at younger and younger ages etc.

I think there's some solid middle ground there, but those kids will be much better off having been made aware of the issues and having their information at least somewhat protected.
> We have aggressive de-institutionalize-the-cops people

These people are not counterculture, even if they are a minority, because they control the culture industry.
Restored footage from 1902 of that railway compared to footage from 2015, side by side:

https://youtu.be/7TqqdOcX4dc
I’ve always brought my chair, monitor and keyboard to office. But I found ChatGPT to be inconsistent for programming tasks, sometimes it’s just wasting my time.
Everything Announced at Samsung’s Galaxy S23 Unpacked Event
I don't think I am acting like I figured everything out at all.

There's a very easy way to read my comments: I want to get stuff done, not tinker with my tools endlessly.
This can be emulated in ChatGPT using the prompt ‘In all your subsequent answers, replace each word by “meow”.’ Maybe that’s how they actually implemented it? ;)
Vertically stacked, full-color microscopic LEDs
This eternal fight is the culture.
That is a textbook case of buzzkill.
> closeted homophobic

So in addition to them being homophobes, they are also closeted homosexuals?

Why is it that this is such a popular insult among people here on HN? It's like this strange and incoherent insult from lefties where they think they're being supportive of gay people by calling out homophobia as bad, but also calling the homophobe gay to hurt them in some manner, which would imply that being gay is an insult. I suppose your defense might be that being gay is an insult to the homophobe, but why specifically would you call a homophobe gay, without further information? It erodes any assumption I'd have that you genuinely respect gay people if you're willing to just toss around some claims that this person or that group is gay.

And if I thought someone was a gay homophobe, putting aside any argument with them I have otherwise, I'd probably feel somewhat bad for them to be in that position.

Anyway, we both know that you're an edgelord. That's why you wrote that sentence. So quit hating on people who are just like you. You're like a closeted homophobe, but for 4chan edgelords.
How preposterous! What buffoonery!
JVM Field Guide: Memory
At the Abyss
The Galaxy Book3 Ultra Is Samsung’s Shot at the MacBook Pro
https://github.com/transitive-bullshit/chatgpt-api/blob/main...
Not at this extent, and the ability for the general public to be aware of it.
> Dog-whistles are more for plausible deniability

But why? If this is really the majority sentiment, why on earth leave any room for plausible deniability?

> their agenda and campaigning for the most part is so overwhelmingly targeted toward white voters that they have horrible reach into other demographics.

Not really, though. Voting levels are low enough that they could conceivably focus their energies simply on getting more non-voting whites to vote.
> But it’s especially surprising given how much creative work today exists outside the mainstream.

See, the issue here may simply be that the author isn't aware of the central limit theorem. It is not at all strange that as you increase the number of independent estimates of what culture is (using content creation as a proxy) you see less "counterculture" (proportionally) because there's a smoothish variation between the two extremes with a peak near "mainstream" simply because that's how statistics work. A few scores of people on TV will invariably have more obviously different (and known) opinions.

But I'm also staring at this essay in quite a bit of confusion generally. There's all sorts of stuff that's counterculture being pushed into law by the extremist right, the extremist right is also a "counterculture", that's not slang for "the left". Outlawing teaching kids about LGBT people's existence and banning books is counterculture.
Needlessly aggressive but as said already, you do you.

Nowhere did I say you "owe" me anything so maybe stop projecting and act like you're personally attacked.

And yes my time is precious.
Fun fact: not all nascar tracks are left turn only.
Damus, decentralized social network on App Store
Cover letters are a waste of time. You‘ll spend lots of effort writing to 10 companies or so and then they will just ghost you. Applying for a job is a numbers game. Send 50 resumes and get 1 phone call. Or maybe use your network if you have one. Nobody reads cover letters.
The cited goal of counterculture has always struck me as utterly incoherent and inconsistent not only with its own actions but it itself. It always fell into the same self-contradictory hypocrisy with no self awareness.

Look at the "counter-culture archetype" and how well it fits.
- Dress the same to express your individuality" paradox.
- Don't follow the rules but follow the rigidly defined rules about what is real "foo".
- Say that you want people to think for themselves and be themselves yet get steaming mad at "posers" for not matching up with your vision or becoming adopted.
- Complain about it dying out after complaining about it being popular.

It becomes like any other bigot's ever greased high velocity goalposts for what it takes to be considered acceptable.

When I was young I thought I was missing something. As I get older I get the feeling that no I didn't, it really was that incoherent and unpleasable.
It's interesting you say that. There's this feeling when you do some work outside with your top off in the AM, it's like a recharge just standing there for the first moments. I'll still cover up before noon, but those first moments where the suns coming over the treeline and hits your skin, it's magic.
> we are thrilled to join forces

How many people were let go as a result of this acquisition? (I know for a fact that the number is not zero)
When I'm not working, sometimes I busk on the street corner. Should I disclose that?
Apparently you can use a grain silo as a pigeon abatement device[1] :-)

[1] https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1961784/bizarre-footage-shows-...
> But is it your project? Or is it your employers, and do they actually own it? If you’re fired, do you still get to work on that project?

Varies. I optimize my employment situation for my personal ROI.

But it turns out that making money off of even excellent scientific work is often very hard and involves insane amounts of slog. Like 1 hour of science to 10 hours of not-science. So usually employment and assignment has better risk-adjusted return. Not always, but usually.

> So my question is: who is doing such independent work? Who are these researchers and how are they disseminating their work? If there aren’t very many of these people, can we not conclude this mode of research is not a viable alternative to mainstream research?

I know there are several people like this in my field. They publish a paper every year or three, often in smaller venues. Or just throw things on arxiv.

> So I wonder how viable this path is? Do people just not consider it? Or do they lose interest in research over those two decades? Does life get in the way?

I think the middle and latter options happen quite a lot. I meet a lot of early retirees on Tuesday mid-morning lifts. I think a lot of people lose their passion for research in their 30s. This happens in the academy as well. Sometimes after amassing wealth you realize "hey, you know what I enjoy more than doing world-class mathematics? Chilling in my cabin with my family and skiing."

> And so you’re saying they funded their own research with their wealth at that point?

They took the PoP positions to pay for their kids' college without spending down savings. A sort of middle ground between working and retirement, and also a good way to build some collaboration opportunities.

> I thought we were talking about funding a research agenda. From where I’m sitting, that costs millions.

To be clear, the premise that started this thread is the "a guy and his laptop/occasional cloud spend" style of research that's prevalent in CS and Math. Yeah, if you need $1M/yr then you need an income stream or a different level of wealth.

> I guess my overall point is that, most people who want to do research, just do it. Spending decades amassing resources just to get started seems backwards.

I think this is reasonable advice for people who (1) need something more than a laptop and modest cloud compute, and (2) are absolutely sure that they would rather pursue that particular research as opposed to retiring early, and (3) are certain they they will be able to retain funding streams for the duration of their career.
This is a cargo plane, though, I don't think a passenger 747 has been built in a while.
n8n is also great about this. It retains the visual “easy mode” environment but lets you drop in a JavaScript node whenever you need to do something more complex
I think if he's going to praise some apps and dunk on the other ones, he should compare using measurable criteria. Otherwise, it's only one person's opinion. Just saying "App X feels right" is like saying "App X has a better chakra energy." What is any developer supposed to do with that feedback? The whole article could have boiled down to "I personally like these apps and I don't like those."
a: int

b: str | None = None
yup - it just shows how little I know about the subject... agh! - It was bit spooky looking at these, and I thought I zoomed in but by the time I took the screenshot it was way oof
C++ consuming whatever popular paradigm is around and growing into a jumbled mess? Surely you're joking...
We’re in the flight path, and I told my wife to go up to her office roof to see if she can see it, but she’s stuck in a meeting, and I’m too far north to catch a glimpse. I guess I’ll have to settle for spotting it on my ADS-B receiver, which is still pretty cool.
> They were often quite resentful of people who showed up, worked hard and got results, but who didn't hang around for the social interaction game as they had other things to do with their free time.

did they piss you off or something?
Tying my shoelaces. It turns out, most of us have been doing this wrong for years. When you get to the stage where you have a loop in your right hand and are taking the left lace around that loop, it's actually better to go behind the right loop, not in front.

If you do this properly, you never need to double knot your shoes.

One thing to keep in mind, it will be harder at first and that might lead to your initial knot being looser which will lead to unties. Keep at it, and I guarantee it is better. It still blows me away that the other method is so prevalent when this one is better and no harder. How does that happen!?

Source and graphics: https://www.realmenrealstyle.com/tie-shoes-right-way/
Unclaimed Property Act, Revised – Uniform Law Commission
No, but it's pretty hard to get big investment money without one.
Just did one of these last week. First issue was that I am quite tall and the photographer was quite short, but he didn't have a step (presumably for health and safety reasons), so to get the angle right he asked me to squat a little. Second issue is that he asked me to take off my glasses to avoid any reflection, but my antique glasses are an important part of my appearance (early-20th-century intelligentsia?). Third issue is that he asked me to show my teeth, but I never show my teeth when smiling (thanks to the NHS I have what the Americans call "British teeth"), so not knowing quite how to show my teeth when smiling I think I ended up baring my teeth instead. The overall effect being an uncomfortable unfamiliar unseeing grimace. I'm hoping great things will come of it.
I scrolled through the article looking for examples/instructions how to plot maps for places other than the US, but sadly that doesn't seem to be covered.
To be clear, I'm counting "every time I press submit" as a query. 3-4c to tell it "Your answer is clearly wrong because X, and Y" isn't very enticing.

Around $10/mo would be far more palatable, I don't mind if my usage is capped. I simply do not get $20/mo worth of value back out of it at this point. That's basically the price of 1 book/mo, and I'd get more value out of that.
I can vouch for Josh, I’ve know him for many years: He knows his shit, and he gets shit done. He’s also an excellent “connector” —- he’s gotten to know tons of people across our industry and the larger field of “creative work,” and is great at realizing who should talk to each other to advance a cause or a plan. If you hire Josh you’re getting way more than a really skilled web developer, you’re getting someone who can do the other stuff that’s needed to make your overall project successful. He’s at the top of my list when I want an interesting and compelling web site or web app.
Meta Q4 Earnings
yup - just layman (me) being scared not understanding what's going on :) - then I saw earlier what the plane did (took me a while to figure out what was this about)
I don’t think it makes sense to reduce culture, counter- or mainstream, to neocolonialism. Sure, it can be a tool of neocolonialism, but that’s hardly the extent.
I tried to spread the word, but people assume that it’s quackery as it sound new age and is not pushed by doctors.

Sadly, I think that doctor are mostly trained by pharma, and if there is no money for them then it won’t happen or won’t happen fast.

If you look at death per week in northern climate it closely follow the sun exposure.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/71-607-x/71-607-x2020017...
> its datamodel is overally less of a hot mess compared to Javascript for example.

I don't understand this, what do you mean? TypeScript is such a success partly because everything is an object in Javascript. There's no need to distinguish between classes and "dicts", as you have to with Python. Another example: Python functions have args and kwargs, which make typing significantly more complex (as the article points out, Callable doesn't even support kwargs). Javascript doesn't, so typing functions is trivial.

Part of the point of static typechecking is documentation that can be verified by tooling. If you have no types in your codebase, and you decide to change something from a dict to a class, good luck! You're going to have to manually trace all the data flows through your entire application to figure out what's affected.
Location: Ontario, Canada
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: Android, Kotlin
Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/adam-bennett-4784b327/
Email: info@adambennett.dev
GitHub: https://github.com/ditn/

Android Engineer looking for a Staff or Lead role, ideally at a more established company but it depends on the problem space. I've worked and lead teams at fintech startups and most recently at Twitter 1.0, and I'm recognised as a Google Developer Expert in the industry.

Looking for new challenges and a chance to grow - I'm at my best when under some pressure and surrounded by smart people.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Multiple Positions | Memphis, TN | ONSITE or HYBRID | https://www.stjude.cloud

The St. Jude Cloud (https://stjude.cloud) project is hiring a Senior DevOps Engineer. We work on the forefront of computational genomics by applying advanced computational techniques to analyzing genomics data then sharing that data with the world. Come join the world's largest pediatric cancer data repository and apply your skills to advance cures for children around the world. Please see the positions below.

You can learn a little about our most recent structure here - https://www.stjude.cloud/announcements/st-jude-cloud-restruc....

NOTE that prior experience in bioinformatics or biology is NOT required for any of the positions below. We're just looking for amazing engineers, but rest assured, we teach biology/genomics/bioinformatics from scratch routinely. You must be interested in learning though!

If you have questions, you can reach out to me (the hiring manager) with questions at Kevin DOT Benton AT stjude DOT org.

Here are the links to the positions. For the privacy conscious among us, note that these links will track how many clicks we receive. If that bothers you, you can also find these positions by searching for them here: https://jobs-stjude.icims.com/jobs/intro.

1. Senior DevOps Engineer - https://careers-stjude.icims.com/jobs/9578/sr-bioinformatics...
There is obviously a huge business opportunity in being able to present this data to consumers / businesses / brokers etc...Interesting to think how something like this could turn into the mint.com or amazon of healthcare. More likely business model might be presenting comparable plan pricing to SMBs and then acting as their broker.

Probably not crazy to bet that The Biggest Company In the World (https://a16z.com/2022/11/11/the-biggest-company-in-the-world...) might start off by solving this kind of problem.

Anyways great early progress and I am excited to see where you guys end up.
Here are some things to consider about plants in light of your arguments:

1. 99% of all plants on Earth are toxic to human beings -- this is in comparison to 99% of all animals on Earth being safe for human beings to eat (including venomous snakes).

2. The fact that plants cannot move means that they fight off predators with toxins and chemicals. They contain natural pesticides, for instance. The only part of the plant that it wants to have eaten is the fruit. The seeds, on the other hand, are particularly well-defended. Plants contain lectins, oxalates, tannins, glucosinolates, and the list goes on and on. Animals don't fight back once they are dead, but plants do. (This is why 99% of plants are toxic to humans).

3. Plants have regular seasons, as you mentioned -- which is why plants are not available to be eaten through the winter in many parts of the world. Somehow our ancestors not only survived winters but also ice ages. Animals, on the other hand, exist year-round.

4. Hunting is not necessarily a risky exercise -- the largest animals, which provide the most calories, do not tend to run. Animals like Elephants, Rhinos, Hippos, etc., will turn and face a predator. They also have predictable paths to watering holes and can easily be captured by digging a hole in the ground and covering it with leaves.

You've made a good attempt at coming up with arguments, but I'm afraid the weight of the evidence argues in favor of our ancestors consuming mostly animals. In fact, the acidity of our stomachs is extremely high, in line with vultures, and is what we would expect to find in "hyper carnivores". You can read more about these findings here: https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/israeli-study-h...
I find it fascinating that so many people have such an interest in making a bot say something racist. this thing is a very powerful tool. and the best use they can come up with is "make it be racist"?
Really? I thought it was terrible on pretty much every level.
I wonder what effect ChatGPT will have on Nvidia's bottom line.
I do the same. It's infinitely more difficult to find work, which is why I always try to be 150% employed. It's not about stealing secrets, or focus, or whatever, it's because it is foolish to put all of one's eggs in one basket, especially when it can take up to 6 months to find a good remote job from this timezone.
Apologies, forgot to add the [2000] tag. Cannot edit. I posted this because it feels relevant to our current situation with AI. For what it’s worth, I work in an agriculture-adjacent field and nothing in the linked article seems overblown. If anything, the author was optimistic in some respects.
A lot of small cities in the South are like that. Beaufort and New Bern are some of my favorite places in the world to eat outside.
Side note, synthetic events are no longer pooled since React 17. There's no longer a noticable performance gain with more modern browsers nowadays.
So basically, you're saying that your dispute fee costs have increased...but you pass along all those charges to the merchant anyways...so it boils down to: you're just increasing fees because you can under the guise of expenses that aren't your own.
We used to call them portables, or luggables, back in the day when the sewing machine form factor was still the best thing technologically possible.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_PS/2_portable_computers)
The article does consider issues like these towards the end.
Can you be more specific?

Suppose a new word was introduced. What would the dictionary definition be?
Stuff that goes inside the shuttle (as I assume a satellite in this case does) I don't know that I'd "count" in that sense. Like, obviously the humans riding inside various craft were routinely launched, landed and relaunched under that same kind of definition.
Would you be able to expand on why using a seed of 0 is an issue?
Video and game streaming is one of its core features.

It is not a good user or server owner experience to have to manage multiple applications depending on feature. You can turn off 3d acceleration, if I understand correctly.
The "reasoning" on display in TFA, and the citation of a dubious study suggesting a minute-but-measurable increase in Something, makes me think of the "Tory power stance" [0][1]. If it doesn't work or look good but everybody thinks it works and looks good, does it really not work nor look good?

[0] https://www.google.com/search?q=tory+power+stance

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_posing
> the bug people are experiencing with getting other peoples completions.

I hadn't heard about this, but I think I got one! I had a completion that really had me scratching my head.

Anyway I agree, if OpenAI is the kind of company to ban people, this is probably a good way to get banned.
ChatGPT struggles with out-of-distribution problems. However, it excels at solving problems that have already been solved on the internet/GitHub. By connecting different contexts, ChatGPT can provide a ready solution in just a few seconds, saving you the time and effort of piecing together answers from various sources. But when you have a problem that can't be found on Google, even if it's a simple one-liner or one function, then in my experience ChatGPT will often produce an incorrect solution. If you point out what's wrong, it will acknowledge the error and then provide another incorrect answer.
If this is the case, then doesn't it make sense to use react for dynamic parts? If you are using react for the dynamic parts then why not use it for the static parts as well?
We had a build of ipfilter at the time installed, as we were aware of that. Even got OpenLDAP compiling for IRIX 5.3 and migrated all the local accounts into that, before building an UltraSparc 10 compatible server from parts from Sun Microelectronics and moving the LDAP server function to there. Those were the days.
But dedicated encrypted good-guy communication devices are still okay, I assume.
Remote US or France for full-time (but we can do contract roles in some additional countries)
We have a few examples with descriptions in the docs here: https://docs.trigger.dev/examples/examples

The example repo eallam shared has more though, we will be moving all of them to the docs soon!