skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What has worked for me is going back to my origins. Go back to C, C++, linux, python... from there everything will be clear. It might sound pointless but believe me, it works. Besides, there is so much stuff nowadays on github that you can clone and play with.
In this day and age many people can't handle strong opinions.

In my experience Drew is a lovely person both online and offline so to each their own I guess.
Judges aren't binary computers. They're people. It's people all the way down.

On the other hand, there's no halting problem. Get on the docket, get a result. Even if the result is "No standing. Go away."
I don't think it's an unexpected at all given that the original repo was private, not just the fork. Secondly a GitHub "user" isn't really a user in the consumer sense. They're a developer, as a developer/professional you can be expected to consult the documentation of a tool you use so you understand default behavior.
EVs catch fire far less often than gas-powered cars, firefighters need to adapt
Post was a Twitter clone. Not a very good one either, I'm afraid. Isn't Twitter tiktok for text already?
> What prevents them from having the code locally?

Likely lack of initial intent and effort.

Just like having firewalls and the most recent security updates doesn't mean that you are inpenetrable. After all, the most common attack vector is the good old phishing email tactics and other ways of social engineering someone anyway. However, it doesn't mean that you shouldn't have a firewall (or other ways of defending your server) or that you should neglect timely security updates.

There are layers to this. Sure, someone who had an intent to do it from the start could've cloned the repo locally ahead of time. But for a lot of people it could be a crime of opportunity. Or it could also be that their account with access to the fork on github gets compromised later and a malicious third party got access to it.

My point is, having this restriction on forks won't prevent a determined attacker from getting it preserved locally ahead of time, you are correct. But it will prevent a lot of other unwanted scenarios that could result from not having the current restriction on forks of repos that went private.
If you're using dbt, dbt tests are a good start: https://docs.getdbt.com/docs/build/tests

You can hook up dbt tests to your CI and Git(hub|lab) for data PRs.

Depending on your needs, you can also look into data observability tools such as Datafold (paid) or re_data (free)
I don’t see how it’s comparable, it can only drive 30 miles and needs a new battery.
Cool to hear Command E search has improved a lot -- it's good for the space generally. Curious what platforms you're searching mostly on -- for the majority of Needl users their information is already on the cloud (granted a startup having your data is different than Google).

We've also found searching messaging platforms (Gmail / Slack) and the generative aspect to be the most difficult. Finding links to docs that you know the title of is less challenging. So if you just use Command E for Dropbox / Drive / Local, then it's almost certainly the right solution for you.
Thank you! Tidepool looks to have some really cool looking features thanks for pointing it out!
Absolutely not. Do you think we’d use resources more effectively by cutting our hours?

Maybe the global maxima is not the standard 9-5 work day, that’s almost a given, but to claim that working dramatically less will yield better results is absurd.
https://www.linen.dev/ makes it possible (not my product)
More accurate would be to call it TikTok for Links, not for text, as text without links isn't allowed.
I swear we could have worked for the same company lol. They migrated from HP to SNow... not much of an improvement.
Thank you! This was a super cool article. There's some neat and very spicy things happening in the CA legislature :D
That gets complicated. It's in (for example) my namespace. So shagie/foo.git

And now you want to return it to BigOrg/foo.git - where does it go in that namespace of BigOrg? What are the permissions for who should have access to that? Who gets billed with a scheduled action runs and chews up a lot of CI credits as a parting gift?

The workflows for anything other than "delete it" gets GitHub in a bit of a mess.
The correct word is “romaji” [0], and in the standard Hepburn romanization, “は” as a particle is written “wa” [1].

[0] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ローマ字

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hepburn_romanization#Particles
Most people don't eat per calorie. They eat to fulfillment which is some combination of volume & weight.
It's not a tautology, because it isn't clear that there is some threshold beyond which connections are too weak or too strong. I might think that more connections are more good, for instance.
Operating a bank, lending, and money transfer operations in so many countries requires an incredible amount of behind the scenes work.

Plus all the KYC, support, fraud, and infrastructure to support all those roles.

You wouldn't know it based on how terrible their support is, but that 28k number doesn't shock me.
Please stop using HN for ideological battle. You've been doing it a lot, unfortunately. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for, and we ban accounts that do this regardless of what they're for or against.

Also, please don't use multiple accounts to do this and especially not in the same threads.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
We ship the most code on Friday
I have one too. I love the very standard hardware - even a regular barrel jack for the power adapter.

That said, the keyboard could be better.

I hate the trend in flat-top keys we have now. I honestly love the feel of gently recessed keys. I had an early macbook pro and the keys seemed to press against my fingertips uniformly instead of having the "hotspot" you get in the center of the flat key.
There is at least one open issue on the Mastodon github project requesting basic functionality without requiring Javascript. Which notes that this is clearly already possible:

"Show post content at standard post URLs when JS is disabled instead of just 'enable JavaScript' message, since this is already done for /embed URLs #23153"

<https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/23153>
Super interesting post. Tyvm!
Which three sources would you recommend for someone fluent in ML to read up on to arrive at your conclusions presented here (or their own)?
Just curious: do you believe this a Seattle problem, a United States problem, or an urban problem?
We've experimented with this a fair bit, very low occurrence of the model making up facts when the answer exists within a document, but users have reported outside information (general knowledge) being shown in their results.

We essentially just prompt GPT-3 to ignore everything that is outside of the chunks of information we provide it.
It's a feature of EDR products, it lets IT isolate a device from the network to stop malware hitting other devices on the network.

If you so wanted you could build a firewall that blocked all Linux devices based on something like Nmap's OS detection.
That is universally true.
That must be one of the more extreme examples. I'm probably being under compensated at the moment, but about half of recruiters reaching out are matching my salary.
And this is why I buy exclusively from Microcenter. My sympathies to those without local access to one.
This destroys the very basic idea of opensource. That the first developer on a project can hand off to someone else to take over the project, and have the project continue past their involvement.

Now if the first developer deletes their account or repo everything dies.
The biggest reason to do this is thah it supports "mirror" repositories where it will keep your copy up to date, even using github keys to get at a private repo if you want.
That's what I'm talking about: I want to run Python code on my server, but since it's from an untrusted source I want to make sure that it's in a sandbox with strict limits on what it can do, how much CPU it can use and how much RAM it has available to it - so malicious code can't be used to crash my server or steal data it shouldn't have access to.
I thought Spotify and Tidal are the same price, $10/mo
makes sense. I too have also started to explore more diverse topics including psychology. But I miss my old days. I guess I was 7 or 8 years old when I got my first computer. During these 28 years of life, nothing has ever given me more joy and excitement than learning doing cool edits in windows registry, commands in windows cmd, and discovering features of Microsoft access, when I was at that age.
I know Luis, the creator of Coldbox. It's a great framework, and the quotes reflect his personal values, but other than finding that in the documentation, you won't find yourself being beat over the head with scripture. In years past, there were several other CF frameworks, and none could be characterized as having religious quotes, just the one :-)
Do you have a local clone? If yes, just populate a new remote with the local clone. If not, always a good idea to keep an updated clone of every remote repo. That's how git is supposed to work. The latest pull is the backup.
> If you want to learn it, just practice. It will take time. It will probably be worth it.

A skill that you need to practice with dedication and that "takes time" to learn still doesn't sound basic.

As someone that has participated in lots of flirting, conversation, and curiousness about other people, I can say confidently that being curious and being good at conversation are not sufficient to navigate flirtatious behavior successfully, unless you're using "art of conversation" as a huge umbrella term which includes charisma / etc. If you are doing that, then I'll note that probably the majority of people on Earth have not mastered the art of conversation (or even cultivated it much) by such a broad definition.
Is ECC an option?
> If someone makes the wrong decisions because they start ignoring signals then don't promote them or give them important coordinating responsibilities. Those who are capable of filtering out a larger fraction of noise do exist.

This is simply wishful thinking. Outliers certainly exist, but the idea that there are sufficient number of them that you can just ignore human nature is a path to disaster. You'd have to somehow accurately measure not just who is opening these noisey e-mails, but what they are retaining from them, and measure it over a large period of time, knowing that the vast majority or going to fail. It's far cheaper and more reliable to fix your noisey system than to try to outwit human nature.
Boston Dynamics: Automated Trailer Unloading for DHL
Except Cisco doesn’t have a commit feature in any of their OS and the rollback feature is not implemented everywhere as well - NXOs doesn’t have it for example. Still, it’s better than ‘reload in 5’ that we had to use back then.
As a kid, my parents got me a cheap AM transmitter toy that broadcast on 1610.

Cutting edge tech in the early aughts, it ran on AA batteries and had a tape player, a microphone, and an aux in. My broadcasts made it across the cul-de-sac from my room. It was immensely enjoyable.
That seems something in the ballpark of my favorite wiki software:

https://github.com/gollum/gollum

Edit and view pages as a normal markdown wiki. But the backend is just a git repository of markdown files so you can also just use your text editor and git pull/push. Usable by any novice but with the ideal power user interface.
Only if the employee decides they were harassed. This was a "loophole" in a harassment training package a former employer used. Basically if you were of an ilk that will always be believed by HR you get a blank check on what to consider harassment. A classic some are more equal than others scenario.
Looks like a gitlab.com backup of everything is mandatory.
I think this is exactly it.

A year to make fixes and nothing was done?

Legal is like, "We warned you every way we possibly could have."

"two phone calls a day for 14 days" is far from insufficient notice, to say nothing of the rest.
The Internet, but for Hot People
If you could provide example code for how to do this - how to run a snippet of untrusted Python code using wasmtime-py with a CPU and RAM limit - I would shout it from the rooftops. I think a LOT of people would benefit from clear examples of how to actually achieve this.
Adherence to principles does not make a person a jerk.

If anything there should be more people like this if the world is going to be a better place.
https://archive.is/jO7a7
> There's this hope that if only for the fragmentation, Linux might finally have Photoshop or whatever.

If Adobe builds Photoshop for Red Hat and make it run only on Red Hat, people wanting to use Photoshop will install Red Hat. The big problem is what happens when Microsoft makes Excel work perfectly on Ubuntu and only on Ubuntu.
Not ECC to me. I want to see the reports with EDAC or something else.
Yes, and if you stop the process and start it again, gitea doesn't complain and picks up right up where it left off. Ditto if you lose internet connectivity. It's a well-designed piece of software. I considered using it as a BaaS and am actually thinking again of using it as one.
There are constantly kids in my area out and about, playing or on their way to play. I'm not sure what kind of wasteland you thing the suburbs is, but lots of children are within walking distance of each other.
Yes, I've tried it (and actually run a personal instance myself), but I would never try to run an application meant as an webapp when I want to copy something from one filesystem to another, when git can do it already without any external programs.

Also, the `master` is just an example, it works for `main` as well, don't worry :) The created git repository on your usb-stick works like a regular git repository, you can use whatever branch names you want.

Btw, way to focus on the absolutely least interesting part of my comment, what I chose to name the branch...
> In your world, everyone counts except the people who actually live in the community today and will be affected by changes.

In my world, everyone counts including the people who actually live in the community today and will be affected by changes...alongside the people who do not yet live there and thus have no voice.

I am vehemently opposed to ladder-pulling in all its forms.

> But minimizing real concerns of people that are the stakeholders isn't fair.

I do not believe I am minimizing their real concerns, I believe I am putting them on the same footing as other real concerns, concerns which people who want to act insular have no motivation to consider. Concerns like the state bill in question here attempts to balance.

Cities change or they die. The world is full of inconveniences and problems related to change but it is not fair to use the regulatory power of the state to insist that a hamlet remain as-is in perpetuity. There are strategies to mitigate those inconveniences instead of "nope, not here."

> I fully support enforcing new developments having to use certain materials and be restricted to certain sizes, styles, and layouts.

In a perfect world, I would be fine with this, but we do not live in a perfect world and these restrictions are more often used as a fig leaf to keep people out than they are to maintain a character. Hell, the phrase "neighborhood character" is very often used as a code phrase for keeping out "those people", whomever is the villain of the day (often renters or people who want to buy but who can't or don't want to buy a massive structure).

These sorts of rules can be useful--look at Leavenworth in Washington State, for example--but, in a lot of places in the United States and especially on the West Coast, they are impossible-to-meet predicates for exclusion.

And that's not fair.
AI has been generating an endless Seinfeld episode for more than a month now
> RAID or not, if you lose an active drive you will need to 1) restore from backup

Er what? I've had production machines lose a drive, have it replaced, and never leave production. Why would you need to restore from backups?
There are probably dozens of languages with "for each" loops, and plenty of languages where you don't have to restate the return type of a function (e.g. "with x as foo() do" or "let t = foo()" and such).
This comment is such a non-sequitur that I would accuse it of being AI-generated, but even AIs are better than that these days.
Which languages?

Python is OOP; but the "classical" data-centric languages are actually all more or less in the FP space. (I count array languages and APL-likes to FP in this case).

Just an example: You don't have immutable data types by default in Python. This is actually a pretty bad default for data processing tasks.
I think the way it works from the way I read it, is that there's only a single bit of output for each step of the waveform being shaped that can specify up or down. For a female/higher frequency waveform the crests/troughs occur more rapidly so the bits have to be output faster thus needing more bits per unit time. There might be more to it than that as there might also have been something there about variable time steps, but that was the gist of it that I got.
Something similar happened to me on IBM Cloud, back when it was called Bluemix. This was early in my career for an early-stage startup (that eventually shuttered - not due to this issue, but rather due to a lack of investor interest and us running out of runway as a result). Easy enough setup: staging and production, each with two Docker containers, one for the (Elixir/Sugar) app and one with the (Postgres) database.

Well, one day the production Postgres container just... vanishes. All the storage is gone. After weeks back and forth with IBM's support, they confirm that the loss is permanent. No explanation, no refunds, just "lol fuck you". Naturally, we didn't have backups yet, so the few users we did have now had to start from scratch.

I, too, learned my lesson about not doing an offsite backup regularly - and the bigger lesson that Bluemix should've been a last resort option. Funny enough, we had migrated to that from Heroku; we ended up migrating again to AWS (specifically: Elastic Beanstalk).
Interesting paper, thanks for posting. The paper goes on to say:

> One should take care not to overestimate the impact of language on defects. While the observed relationships are statistically significant, the effects are quite small. Analysis of deviance reveals that language accounts for less than 1% of the total explained deviance
I wonder if this works the other way around.
- create new repo in your personal GitHub acct.
- fork it to company repo.
- leave company years later
- revoke access to company codebase. :)
It's usually some commercial programs that have issues.. I was going to try it and give a more specific answer, but Ubuntu does not let me run twm. I get a blank screen when I log in with twm selected.
I recall the explanation of an excellent little Japanese grammar book that made it click for me: 私は puts the emphasis on what you, as opposed to everyone else is doing, and the closest english equivalent is "As for me,".

If you translate it that way, 「私は牛肉を食べます」means, in English: "As for me, I will eat beef."

Notice now that both "me" and "I" are present in the translation. So adding が doesn't in fact change the sentence at all!
Even better if the language supports scoping comments to particular code blocks, and comments can be made in markdown/mermaid (or equivalent) so you can diagram, link and TODO comments.

Documentation tooling should be able to make a good job of constructing a class/function DAG with scoped commentary. This is kind of a reversal of Literal documentation, but I suspect it may be more maintainable by teams.

Literal docs only seem to go in one direction, that is documentation->code, not the other way around. This I guess is more in-line with scientific hypotheses. Literal tests may be even more tricky as TDD doesn't gel well with Literal hypotheses.

I guess a Doc-driven dev process would be a novel approach here, and probably more usable than AI-supported systems. Copilot has been quite divisive on it's effectiveness.

DDD in that every eg. Class requires a comment and a test even if they are blank, to force at least a thought about them. Having a code manifest at the root of a repo can also be used to configure the envs the code runs in, and the integration tests that it needs to do both local and in-place.

Lastly, as mentioned elsewhere, logs are comments as well, and again would be well to be scoped in the language.
This is why I don't use github's fork feature. There's more than just this restriction they impose upon you.

Instead I prefer to use a "git" fork. I just clone it and upload it to my own repo. Assuming the license permits of course.
there is often a special hell reserved for those who try to create a special hell for others.
> It's a core reason why the Internet Explorer team had issues with CSS composition

I may be entirely mistaken, but isn't that just because WHATWG hasn't forked CSS away from W3C? Perhaps this is an indication that they should?

> Maybe HTML parsing is one of them, but HTML parsing mechanics are perhaps the least interesting of all of the specifications.

They're something that was previously (as far as I know) completely undocumented, for which there's now a publicly documented algorithm that actually parses real web content. I think that's a good approach to provide for more things, and there are still plenty of things for which we don't have enough information like that.

> Because further still, there are whole sections of web standards that are intentionally undefined and left to vendors to implement however they want.

Other than the utter garbage fire that is DRM, what other aspects are "intentionally undefined"? (Genuine question, would love to learn this, and would be unpleasantly surprised to find out that there are more.)
Gitlabs has their guide up, I love it and use it all the time. I've been doing data engineering in a small team for about 4 years, helping hospitals with data and hopefully making it easier to understand. Something that is overlooked or undervalued in my opinion, have stark distinctions for separating out technical and business logic tests. It makes it easier communicating what's happening in the event something is 'wrong' vs wrong, and it's easier to bring a non-technically inclined team member up to speed. Also, I think it's good to learn from the SaaS side of things and not bloat up or overengineer with infrastructure as data engineering is the latest development flavour. Keep it simple. Great expectations is a great tool however I think small teams should take really hard looks at their needs and see if a simple orchestration engine and SQL testing is enough. A centralized source for testing is great, however infrastructure isn't free even when it is you are paying for it with you and your teams time.
Digital hoarding could be linked to anxiety, and technology may be to blame
Yes, but this is happening only because life expectancy is increasing and underdeveloped countries are experiencing population growth. 8 out of 10 countries that are expected to experience population growth are in Africa. So, most of the world will lose population. The main issue here is how to sustain the aging population, not so much how much the population will increase over time. If you have 60% of people over the age of 60, it is impossible for the rest to sustain it. Immigration for those that are accepting will help, but this is most likely not enough.
The UK was one of the top 3-4 nations by voting power (depending on the time) in the 27-member EU and a very important player in EU politics. Their negotiating power is evidenced by the fact that they were able to secure opt-outs from a number of treaty obligations.