skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
These devices exist. You just don't want to pay for them.

https://www.kohler.com/en/products/showers/shop-shower-trims...

What you have in your shower is a cheaper anti-scald valve that just prevents super huge spikes in water temperature when the input pressure changes (i.e. your wife flushes the toilet).

Like PaulHoule says, you need monitoring of input and output temps to do that. And that's technically possible, but it's complex and expensive.
Not exactly sure how representative I should feel, but before, working in the city center, a lot of shops/restaurants got my foot traffic, and since I've been WFH it's mostly my local grocery store that gets all the money.
> They've already released a product! https://www.eye-power.co.uk/
> SAFE
> Deep red light in the near infra red range has been tested by the University College London as a safe emitter

I want to try this, but that's not a lot of safety info to go on...
Some. Some images back. I've not seen anyone claim anything like what you suggest. Do you have an example?

I mean, it literally says "some" right there in the title, and if you click through and actually read the paper you see it's a tiny proportion.
It absolutely matters if you're going to say it passing a human test speaks to anything at all! If humans had a hardcoded multiplication table in their brain, it would be silly to "test" them on their multiplication ability, it would be pointless. Test's are useful precisely to gauge human retention/understanding, but they are even then a crude tool as I think anyone whose taken a test would agree. It borders on absurd to take it seriously for a model. Its like applauding the calculator for doing math.

If you really do think this stuff is important, show it on its own terms. Make tests suited for the model with rigorous expectations tuned for a computer, not a human. Then you can start showing some impressive things. I just urge you to see the basic flaw in your conceptions here. I don't want to rob you of your enthusiasm, just better direct it.
Neither does making all "uncertified" software illegal. That' s against the whole idea of free as in freedom software.

And thanks to that software we are talking seamlessly over the net.
Since nobody's actually answering your question: Colossal's business model is to use de-extinction to push the frontier of various genetic manipulation techniques, patent them when possible, and sell/license the IP they generate to people who are doing other things. For example, the idea is that in de-extincting the dodo, we'll generate useful techniques for manipulating birds that the ag industry might want to use with chickens.

It seems tenuous to me. But I believe that's their stated plan.
That, or use armcord if you want something that lives outside the browser session.
After many iterations and feedback from the HN community, we are relaunching. Our goal is to help you find cool jobs. Please let us know what we can do to improve.

We have a paygate, but use code HNFREE for one month of free access!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia
On the topic of "still quite impressive what can be done", I can't more emphatically recommend (the now quite old!) lecture that Peter Norvig gave which is available on YouTube called the unreasonable effectiveness of data. He does a great job showing some toy and small examples about just how nuanced this point is, and that it is easy to underestimate the impact that simply more data can have. We tend to think of it as a quantitative impact and make all sorts of assumptions as to the second derivative of what the gains can be, but he does a great job showing that there might be all sorts of interesting inflection points and that simply more data can actually have significant qualitative differences.
Hashicorp's front end team is largely composed of former Heroku employees.

They've continued to use the same tools as were employed by Dashboard.

It's a shame Ember is nestle extinct IMO, but oh well.
Which universities engage in preventing exceptional success? Even with grade inflation, it's usually pretty easy to tell when someone is exceptionally capable/intelligent/successful compared to their peers at the same institution.

And the problem of grade inflation is more about universities competing for prestige (and keeping wealthy donor/legacy families happy) than about creating outcome equity.
This is not what anyone else means by EEE. The Wikipedia article is good: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguis...

EEE is specifically an attack on open systems: make something compatible with an open system, do a good job at it, people switch to you, extend your thing, people start using your extensions. You've moved people from an open system to your proprietary one.

All of their examples [1] are in the form "offer a thing people want which is free up to a point, and then when they get to that point they won't be able to stop using it because they're hooked". This is a fine thing to talk about, but using the "EEE" terminology for it both weakens the terminology and makes it unclear what you're saying.

[1] Except the Amazon delivery one, which doesn't fit the rest of the post since there's no step where they increase the charge.
And I live 20 minutes from one and am lucky to get same week delivery, much less two days. It’s only started to get slightly better after amazon started using their own delivery contractors, but now I feel bad if I order because they’re treated poorly.
Would you want to work on a payment standard and then try to convince the rest of the world to use it?

I dunno, that just sounds too soul destroying to me.
I worked at a place that had a "retention policy" for communications. It was actually a destruction policy. Unless you had a court order there was a strict deadline to destroy ALL communications. It even mentioned that keeping backups, notes, printouts, etc. was unacceptable.
The article accuses greentech and carbon-credits of genocide: "While guaranteeing high returns, this deception is tantamount to the genocide of the hundreds of millions of people who will perish from the effects of climate change within the next century because things are that bad."

That's pretty harsh. But, if you think "things are that bad," let's also consider the moral culpability of people trying to stop the scientific study of geoengineering:
https://www.solargeoeng.org/

Scientifically, stratospheric aerosol injection works: IPCC gives "high agreement that it could limit warming to below 1.5°C" with a material cost of less than $10B per year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_geoengineering

But, as we all know, it is intellectually unacceptable to be an advocate for geoengineering. For some reason, "Thou shalt not believe in a technological solution to global warming." Instead, billions of people need to voluntarily (or not) dramatically reduce their lifestyle. I really don't get it. Any insights?
Sometimes, you're just wrong.

"Image diffusion models such as DALL-E 2, Imagen, and Stable Diffusion have attracted significant attention due to their ability to generate high-quality synthetic images. In this work, we show that diffusion models memorize individual images from their training data and emit them at generation time. With a generate-and-filter pipeline, we extract over a thousand training examples from state-of-the-art models, ranging from photographs of individual people to trademarked company logos. We also train hundreds of diffusion models in various settings to analyze how different modeling and data decisions affect privacy. Overall, our results show that diffusion models are much less private than prior generative models such as GANs, and that mitigating these vulnerabilities may require new advances in privacy-preserving training. "

https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13188
[starts typing]

...

[sighs]

[backspace][backspace][backspace]

"No."
I'd assume it's their State of the Art™ React® frontend that's hammering your L3 cache with constant updates.
> PV panels become (on average) carbon neutral after three years of operation

That depends on where you install them. Almost anywhere in Europe it doesn't make sense to use solar, and yet they're doing it.[1]

[1]: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fn4clWEWAAkadtu.jpg:large
> Once the professors hit tenure, the research professors mostly abdicated their teaching responsibilities, whereas the non-research just kept on teaching.

It's a lifecycle. Just-tenured professors are expected to spend those years being as productive as possible on research. That's what they're there for. Full professors conversely will neglect their research and focus much more on teaching, mentorship, and take on administrative roles.
No, that's commoditizing your complement.
Sometimes we do need to set boundaries for safety. I've written more at my web site (in profile, nothing for sale, tech-simple), about having peace and hope when things are hard. There are opportunities to build good things and have joy. All the best to you!

(ps to anyone: thoughtful comments appreciated with any downvotes)
NYT recipes are a nice refuge from this sort of thing. Easy to get around the paywall with browser add-ons as well.
I pulled this image from a random blog about the episode. The episode itself has better shots of the components
Despite what many think, gifted kids are actually special needs as well. Not being challenged enough directly leads to a lack of learning to learn. And that in turn leads to hitting a brick wall at some point.

I have now attempted a few times to finish my higher education, always bounced HARD as I lack the mental facilities needed to deal with the frustration/commitment of actually having to learn.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUjYy4Ksy1E
That's just the way cooking food works, regardless of the recipe source.
which AWS Linux are you using that has OpenSSL 3? Linux 2 still has some variant of 1.0.2 which I'm in the middle of dealing with as a recent audit says that's a problem that needs to be at least 1.1.1[someLetter]. even after enabling openssl11 in the amazon-linux-extras, installing it via yum, still remnants of 1.0.2 is popping up.

i haven't seen mention of openssl 3 anywhere within the context of Linux 2
It looks like there was a control group:

> However, an additional control was undertaken where colour contrast thresholds were measured in the morning and then re-measured 3 h later without exposure to 670 nm. This comprised of ten subjects (six Females and four males). To determine if there were significant shifts in colour contrast sensitivities across the day that were independent of 670 nm and might undermine outcome measures for their exposure, six subjects were repeatedly tested at 0, + 3, + 6 and + 9 h (four Females and two Males).

Figure 2 shows the (lack of) effect in the no-light control group at T0 and T+3hrs. Interestingly, they don't compare to baseline like in figure 1 with the AM light group. However, Figure 4 does show a lack of training effect when repeating the same test 4 times throughout the day within the same subject.

(Also, interesting that your first response to a paper in Nature is that they don't have a control group...)

Edit: And presumably they took the design of their study into account when calculating their statistics (https://www.stat.cmu.edu/~hseltman/309/Book/chapter14.pdf). Their methods seem to imply that, but I'm not familiar with it so I'll pray the reviewers checked for that lol.
> Vastly, incredibly, insurmountably more expensive.

I don't know why you chose to exaggerate here, but rail lines are +/- the same cost per mile as interstate highway, and that's without the economies-of-scale benefit that comes from there being 100x the number of interstate miles. They're also vastly cheaper in terms of materials; the cost is mainly not materials. Concrete production is also extremely CO2 and energy intensive. Unsurprisingly, a boring 19th century technology deployed with vastly less energy and raw materials is more efficient. We're moving backwards in terms of overall system efficiency because of the economics of supporting a individualistic consumer society. And there's a phalanx of people spreading FUD to defend it from disruption.
Sure, this blog post explains the dependency injection design pattern with Spark: https://mrpowers.medium.com/dependency-injection-with-spark-...

You can structure your code to read from paths when run in the production environment, but inject DataFrames you build in memory for your test suite. Spark is designed to read multiple files in parallel, so it's not optimized to read a single tiny file. That's why it's best to avoid I/O in Spark test suites whenever possible.
We haven't done any ee features yet, which is why we stuck that "if such directories exists" line in there. We're following the playbook from some other OSS companies such as PostHog and Cal.com. Features that will go in ee (off the top of my head) are the teams and billing features of our hosted option.

We'll be working on self-hosting instructions soon as well :)
Look, it's a blast from 2012, when iOS partisans were fond of claiming that the fatal flaw with Android was lower number of niche, low-audience apps or low app quality or something.

It feels like these 10 years later, we should have some some pretty solid intuitions about how much of a competitive advantage this actually is for iOS.
For the sake of argument, I'd just ignore what is/isn't a religion and lump it all into "principles" or "beliefs".

That said, (I believe, ha...) there should always be the freedom to not engage with beliefs you find hostile. In the US, the 1st Amendment is critical because you must engage with the government on some level, but you don't need to use Truth Social, 4chan, 8kun, or whatever else.
That is the greatest class name ever.
ripcord is basically what you are looking for it works with slack and discord.
Stripe has announced recent enterprise wins (Amazon, BMW) but these are negotiated deals with less margin. Seems like as they increase their share of enterprise they are simultaneously turning the screw on SMBs and start ups.
> While his hope was that everybody was equal, he added, "people who have to deal with black employees find this is not true".

I mean, that's pretty clearly racism.
So he is breaching his bail terms, right? Right? ASCII art star wars princess
One could also read that as providing the nation the ability to handle its own needs for these aircraft and thus not be as reliant on Lockheed Martin. Basically just alleviating one of the primary concerns of choosing a foreign aircraft.
The argument here is more that this attack serves to just "find" these, and while it uses significant compute to do so, it's also not using many of the complex and more efficient extraction approaches that have been used on GANs and such in prior research. They're using a simple method, and exploring what it does; most of their 175 million images comes from effectively "retrying" each prompt 500 times, which could easily be cut down when others are trying attacks, since they're usually much more targetted than this at what they're trying to extract.

Also, "almost no matches" is still problematic, because they still occur, and since they don't seem prevalent, they're unlikely to have been accounted for in any other way (SD 2 being finally based on a deduplicated dataset). So, in a sense, they're "still in there", it's just harder to find by a casual or simple approach as above. Again, one of the central themes is that diffusion seems to be less resistant to attacks than, say, GANs, and that may mean more efficient and complex extraction attacks may translate over even more effectively.
When a checkbox isn't enough – toggles in Rails Forms with Tailwind
Meanwhile, over in iOS land, you cannot call route calls through another service, filter notifications, or run emulators. There is missing functionality, which can never be fixed, not just missing UI niceties in particular apps with (let's be honest) relatively low usage, which get fixed over time as usage increases.
I was a bag boy for six months or so in high school for <insert large corporate Grocer here>. I wanted some extra side money and a friend of mine worked there and offered to put in a good word for me.

Simultaneously, I had been a high performing student, taking all advanced classes, doing after school sports, etc.

The job itself was not intense or anything. But it was miserable. You could tell that nobody working in that store wanted to be there. Some seemed positively stuck too, like they couldn’t move on and improve their lives even if they really wanted (I don’t actually believe this).

Anyways it induced something of a small existential crisis in me seeing all these sad people who had been what I thought at the time was wasting sometimes decades away working these pointless jobs. I became depressed a bit and my studies fell. I also kind of sucked at the job after a while because it was mind numbing.

Anyways it’s put a lot of my career as a software engineer into perspective and I’m very thankful to be in the position I am. I am also much more thoughtful about bigger picture goals and things I want out of life because of it. Perhaps most importantly though I never look down on anyone based on their job or career.
> If someone with FAANG is still applying, that means they're willing to work for that range.

Close but not quite. It's more like:

> If someone with FAANG is still applying, it appears they're willing to work for that range.

When I'm willing to go through the job interview process and say no to an offer I don't like, I completely ignore the salary range. I'll get the interviewer and team to love me and then just decline if they won't go above their range. Or I'll take it because they've convinced me the job will be enjoyable enough to offset the lower salary.

Plenty of things in life are flexible if you ask. But plenty of things aren't flexible even when you ask. Sometimes, I'm willing to waste my time to find out which is which.
This matches my experience in college: some people were miles ahead in CS, but they were all people with an interest in it who put more time into it than the bare minimum. Not necessarily a result of great practical relevance though, as people's interests aren't easy to change.
Turn off “hardware acceleration” in discord settings. It’s a huge GPU hog.
I use ripcord for discord and slack bonus it's a native app and uses about 20mb of ram.
It would depend upon the details of what is meant by learning calculus. Learning enough to pass the average high school class on it isn't much. Above average at math, but nothing very impressive. But the same language could also describe learning it at something closer to the level of analytics, having a much deeper understanding than the average class produces. The deeper the understanding, the more impressive the achievement, yet it would still be described in layman terms as "learning calculus".
Many of the modern monopolists have power that comes from two sided markets. If I was trying to start something like Ebay I would have to get a critical mass of both buyers and merchants whereas if I was just trying to sell a widgets I just need to find 10 customers to buy 10 widgets.

By that analysis, Google is a strong company not because of technological virtuosity or because their products are that good, but because they can strongly monetize any product that they make and it is hard for any other ad brokerage to get in because they don't have the inventory.

Regulators were slow to catch on to this issue in the critical years, they just didn't see anything wrong with match.com buying all the other dating sites. They are just now waking up to the danger of Microsoft buying Activision which is bad not just because it hurts gamers in the short term but in the long term our noncompetitive domestic markets will lose out to markets like China that are more competitive and make better products. (e.g. we are talking of banning Tik-Tok precisely because Google, Facebook and such will kill any attempt to make an innovative social platform in the US)
I make extensive use of geopandas and plotly for doing mapping and it’s very difficult for me to imagine it could get all that much easier. Dump my geo data frame in and specify which columns to use and boom you’ve got a fully interactive map with Open Street Maps data underneath. It even has a variety of themes to choose from!
SEO may be the reason for many of the bigger blogs, but I think we shouldn't default to cynicism here. People who are passionate about a given topic often love to ramble on about it. And if you aren't very passionate about food, you aren't likely to start a food blog.

And most people don't start blogging as a purely educational activity, but rather as a way of expressing themselves. As a result, they aren't necessarily thinking about optimal user experience like a software business would.

I had a coworker who had a food blog and she would fill each post with ramblings like all the rest do, but it is because she wanted to tell her story of why that particular meal was important to her. And if you were to ask her in person about a meal or what she likes to cook, she would talk in as much detail since that was her passion.

The default of assuming everyone is a bad actor is growing rather tiresome. Not to mention, these people didn't need to share their recipes at all. And we aren't compensating them for their work. We just complain.
Ray Peat (RIP) has written about this. Some choice quotes: https://lifegivingstore.com/ray-peat-on-red-light/
When it comes to research maximum output is maximum well being for society (assuming the research isn't garbage, looking at you large parts of the humanities department) because that research drives productivity increases through multiple avenues. This is true because the effect of research is usually broadly applicable (i.e. a more efficient engine can save trillions in fuel and environmental damage) while the costs of overwork are concentrated on a very few that are self selecting for that lifestyle.

That most of the results of hard work go to the business owner is a result of capital being scarce while labor is more likely to not be right now (this is changing but it is a slow process). This is definitely true of academia with massive phd overproduction. If you want more benefit to accrue to phds you need to end the pyramid scheme that has been massively overproducing phds for decades or create broader non teaching/research demand for phds (ideally real demand, not manufactured credential requirement inflation because that causes massive dead weight loss)