skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Also: Why would you already want to start saving in your twenties? If you have to pay debts etc, of course, there's nothing left for saving, but it'll work out in the future when the debts are paid.
Your anecdote gave me an idea. What if we use AI to enhance the communication between people instead of replacing the people?

Imagine you give a problem statement to the LLM, then it tried to find all the subtleties, confusing parts, room for interpretation, etc. All of the people involved revise the problem statement to make it more clear and give it back to the LLM. Iterate like that until satisfied
No wonder they refuse to remove creep block.
I was being a little facetious, but there’s some truth in it.

White men have a lot of privilege, that’s fairly well accepted, and something I know from first hand experience. That privilege is what leads to things like mansplaining and overconfidence in one’s own opinions, or even deeming one’s own opinions to be facts. It leads there because the privileged are less likely to receive pushback on their ideas, more likely to receive praise, or even funding for their ideas, and society treats them as overall more correct.

Huge generalisations of course, but so is most of this thread.
Side/meta-question:

Do you all think that GPT and such will see a pattern of usefulness starting with:

1) blatantly wrong but helping to train/give examples to the most rudimentary and beginning stages of people learning a task? (since that's what it's doing at the same time?) I.e. replacing low-skilled intro training, or more charitably, helping to make it possible for far more people to learn something with assistance?

And then moving up the sophistication level to where it's, say:

2) "ok, I can tell this is not blatantly wrong, and might even be plausible from a medium skilled practitioner or analyst" and I can use this with some error checking.

to

3) even more capable / actually worrisome?

Or, does it occupy a different "sphere" of usefulness / purpose?
If nobody does at the current wage, then wages will have to rise to meet supply/demand.

As it stands individuals see the good feels as part of their wages. Otherwise they would do something higher paying. IF nobody does the job because the good feels does nothing for them then they'll have to start paying as much as the cold capitalist job.
Yes, it looks like they've edited the article within the last three hours. Not sure what else if anything changed, but the original is still up on archive.org

https://web.archive.org/web/20230125042620/https://huyenchip...

So they're apparently not counting it against someone, which is good.
Who knew the Marines teach Shakespearean tactics?

"Till Birnam wood remove to Dunsinane"

Macbeth, Act V, Scene III
People love to say they want full value of their work. They just don't want to take any of the risk. So, they let someone else build the multi billion dollar company first before making demands.

Very few people put their labor where their mouth is.
How much was your access to the data? I'd love to build something off of it, but everytime I hear 'enterprise plan' I think welp, that counts me out as a solo dev, just trying to build side projects.
Thanks -- totally understand! In a few weeks we will have some starter characters so that you don't have to upload any images to get a story.

Re: pricing bc of the manual time it takes to approve stories + GPU costs + super large queue we actually just started offering a paid tier to move up the queue and get your story within 24 hours. Definitely still experimenting tho!
Render is not needed actually. It's one of the requested installation types from our users, so if you want to deploy to Render you can use 1-click install button.

The other installation methods are docker (https://automatisch.io/docs/guide/installation#docker) and docker compose. (https://automatisch.io/docs/guide/installation#docker-compos...) You can choose one of them. I think most of our users are using Docker setup atm.

Please let me know if you have any other questions.
> That's got to put her in the top 10% of 25-year olds.

I think that supports the article. That someone with two-months of income saved up would be in the top 10% of her age group isn't a great sign about the state of her age group.
I primarily listen to Podcasts on my Mac, been using the default Apple one... which works, but it feels very much like a half baked copy from the iPad app.

Sadly no Overcast on Mac, anyone found a good podcast player for Mac? (paid or free)

Edit: Little things like pressing left/right arrows does nothing in the app. (just want to skip around the podcast ads). Buggy UI (as I type this, the volume slider in the app is greyed out.. but still works).
Also there doesn't appear to be any timer, to stop the podcast after x minutes. (I sure it used to do this)
Maybe. Maybe not.

We also have intuition. Where Something just seems fishy.

Not saying AI can’t handle that. But I assure you that a human would’ve identified a moving cardboard box as suspicious without being told it’s suspicious.

It sounds like this AI was trained more on a whitelist “here are all the possibilities of what marines look like when moving” rather than a black list which is way harder “here are all the things that aren’t suspicious, like what should be an inanimate object changing locations”
Ask HN: Are there any other tape formats other than LTO still in production?
TOTP in your password manager bottlenecks you down to 1 factor if that 1 factor is compromised. You can address this concern by protecting that bottleneck behind two factors itself. And we already do that all the time - logging in to a website gives you a single-factor session token that gives you everything, after all! The trick is that the session token is time-limited and rotates frequently (you have to log back in every day or whatever), so it's okay that it's the single factor. The way to re-secure your password manager, then, is to do the same - protect your bitwarden account with 2FA, set it to require re-auth and a webauthn touch every 2 hours or to require a webauthn touch to generate a TOTP code, and you're basically back to the same state you were in when you were getting TOTP off your phone or a yubikey.
It's true, if you had only restated the facts it would not have been a lecture.
I've noticed Apple is destroying their brand equity in so many ways just to squeeze out as much from their customers as possible. Having advertisements in my iPhone settings just shows how petty they are willing to be. I used to use their TV app but now it's first purpose is an advertisement for Apple TV+.
But I don’t want the page connected to their bonuses or SLA’s I just want to know whether they are having any issues anywhere. And I need to know within a minute of my own service not working so I’m not chasing the wrong thing. This can’t be an unreasonable thing to ask for?
Right, because excreted calories are typically consistently small for most people.

That’s not necessarily true for diabetics, so someone with that condition will have a different experience with it.
By the time the semantic description is sufficiently exact, you may as well have written the code, though. [1]

[1] https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e3/2f/22/e32f2209b4c3d6b32bbc...
Pretty good if only what one cares about is CLI and class libraries.

According to JetBrains developer survey, an amazing 3%.

https://www.jetbrains.com/lp/devecosystem-2022/csharp/
Designing my own ASIC with tiny tapeout
I think something of what we perceive as intelligence has more to with us being embodied agents who are the result of survival/selection pressures. What does an intelligent agent act like, that has no need to survive? Im not sure we'd necessarily spot it given that we are looking for similarities to human intelligence whose actions are highly motivated by various needs and the challenges involved with filling them.
I’d be interested in helping out. I have experience with corporate governance and setting up transfer-restricted entities, though unfortunately not so much experience with setting up non-profits (though I have served on non-profit boards).

That said, I can also think of a few ways you might be able to structure a successor that can’t exit like this, without having to deal with the headache of qualification and compliance as a non-profit. Interesting thought exercise.
Exactly. And as long as antibiotics are produced in factories where the left overs are just sent into the drain as well (see India, China), anything else it just a tip of the iceberg. We need true emergency antibiotics - not once that are produced the way they are produced and not once that can still be used for animals.
Here's a #3: It would probably make running LoL private servers much easier. Riot has been extremely aggressive with shutting down private servers (of old versions of the game that people want to be allowed to play, but cannot).
> More awareness needs to be made of how this will have a devestating impact on end-user freedom. They're attacking the PC, one of the last holdouts of general-purpose computing freedom.

This situation reminds me of the fuss around Palladium, a solution which seemed to be abandoned by Microsoft on its merits:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next-Generation_Secure_Computi...

> Edit: nice, downvotes. Hello corpo-authoritarians, we know what's up :-)

This also reminds me of the fuss around Palladium:

https://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2002/07/22/m
> The second example is a lady with 76k in debt, who has managed to pay down nearly 70% of it. Somehow this doesn't qualify as savings to the author.

Not only that, but she manages to maintain an emergency fund of $10k. I... think she's doing just fine?
You're not wrong but it's a double-edged sword: people's first language leaves a deep impression and people often can't un-write (from their brains) the wrong programming practices they learned from Python.

I've seen people openly admit they'd learn their second language much faster if they didn't try to constantly compare it with Python.

As usual, hindsight is 20/20, and nobody is telling you these things beforehand. And those who are lucky enough to have wisdom shared with them are usually quick to dismiss it and not listen to it.
They've barely started trying. We'd be reaching the limits of AI if self-driving cars were an easy problem and we couldn't quite solve it after 15 years, but self-driving cars are actually a hard problem. Despite that, we're pretty darn close to solving it.

There are problems in math that are centuries old, and no one is going around saying we're "reaching the limits of math" just because hard problems are hard.
>I am certain that people who want to read an article with this title are convinced that life has dealt them an unfair hand, and are willing to ignore or dismiss every example to the contrary.

Wow, this is unrealistically antagonistic. I think you need some qualifiers somewhere in that assertion. Anybody who simply "wants to read an article with this title"? Every example to the contrary?
That's absolutely insane. I use face id plus a pass though.
https://archive.ph/VssmA

Sounds like us-east-2d is coming.
Imagine you keep someone on staff at 50/hr, or you just consult based on need, i.e. 15 minute consults are 1/4th the cost, and you simply just ping them to double-check queries you've ran, that look right but maybe could be optimized. You've just cut back from maybe 20/hours to 8 per week needed for that freelancer.
I wonder if/when we'll get comfortable with the errors that an AI like this makes. Certainly human analysts still make errors, and may be able to explain them (which I think LLMs would have a hard time doing), but what if the overall error rate is less than a human analyst?

I imagine this is sort of similar to our comfort with self-driving cars - what if they make fewer dangerous mistakes than humans? Would we actually prefer _more_ mistakes but having a human who can be held accountable and explain themselves? Are we ok with an AI that makes fewer, but categorically different mistakes?
Apparently he told CZ it was insolvent in a phone call: https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/2022/11/16/binance-...
Overcast really destroys everything else I've used for listening to a podcast. Simple and intuitive UI, customizable streaming/download settings, quickly add any podcast - and that's at the free level. I would never go back to Apple or even Spotify.

I rarely get enthusiastic about apps, but it's awesome when one clearly demonstrates a team having gone 'how can we get this right'?
The question isn't if people have time for elite levels of training.

The real question is if you can get more done in the time available to you with HIIT or LISS cardio.

If you're sufficiently time constrained, HIIT will win.

But past a certain threshhold, LISS will always allow you to perform a greater volume of work with lower recovery costs and lower injury risks and, consequentially, greater benefits to health and fitness.
I'm 47. After worrying a lot about this, I came to the conclusion that the objective should be to be comfortable and that's it. If you have a roof over your head, can save some money and are able to travel and have fun, you've made it. Everything else is basically bullshit.

Also, don't create unnecessary problems for yourself - keep it simple. Don't have kids if you don't want to. Don't buy a car if you don't need it. Don't buy a huge house if all your need is 2 bedrooms. In other words, don't measure your success by external metrics.
XSS via SQL Injection, or Bypassing Cloudflare WAF
Ghidra, Pyhidra (Via Jpype), and Callgraphs Oh My
I'm not sure if this is the best advise for rust, since you will play with variable lifetimes than.
AI doesnt. There is a difference.
sounds like an easy enough issue for honest operators
"no hidden fees"
OTOH, It does seem like magic if you have dealt with Java in your previous life
And every attempt to fix this buy making housing affordable for younger people is met by extremely angry accusations of entitlement by the generation with the easiest access to wealth and good salaries in history, and spent their entire time on this earth making things shittier for next generations by making homes a for profit endeavor instead of a thing most people need, ignoring global warming and green energy for the enrichment of very few, removing and kneecapping what few social safety nets this country had, and treating people self medicating with drugs as criminals instead of people desperately trying to avoid burnout.

So yeah, any advice or claim from these people rings stupidly hollow, especially since they regularly seem to have no fucking clue what these young people are experiencing, because in their time, the minimum wage was enough to buy a medium size house, a small car, and have a family.
Why stop at base-20 when base-1000 is available? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cistercian_numerals
I recently saw a CV with a very specific claim about developer efficiency improvements brought about by their introduction of a design system to the product.

I was instantly put off - because while it might be true there’s just way too many variables to claim a 68% improvement was down to your design system.
Yes, that's how it works. Certainly nobody would just complain loudly that "Nobody wants to work anymore!" and demand more suffering for the people at the bottom of society.
Thanks for the suggestions! I've implemented both, and I also reached out to the Forbes writer to let him know his link was broken.
> I still don't feel comfortable,

No loss pointing out that you also publicly show the decryption script. If your system is not resilient against an attacker that knows everything, except the key, then your system would violate Kerckhoffs's principle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerckhoffs%27s_principle).

But you still do not explain how this token relates to the vault, nor how decrypting the token is a necessary dependency to decrypting the vault.
Thus Spoke Zarathustra.

“Man is something that shall be overcome. Man is a rope, tied between beast and overman — a rope over an abyss. What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not an end.”

“You say 'I' and you are proud of this word. But greater than this- although you will not believe in it - is your body and its great intelligence, which does not say 'I' but performs 'I'.”
> But while huge improvements — like the removal of the neighborhood-desecrating Central and Embarcadero freeways — made the city better

Did it? They may not have been beautiful but they weren't such a huge barrier to pedestrian life like their boulevard-level replacements. Nobody ever had to wait for a protected crosswalk when the cars were all elevated. Several intersections of Octavia Blvd don't allow pedestrian crossing at all.
In case of a breach, yes. That's why I said "theoretically". In practice, spreading the factors across different services probably have some benefits (provided that they don't unlock each other).

But breach is ultimately a separate issue from authentication.
I don't know why anyone is surprised. Apple's entire business model is trapping unwitting potential customers.
I don't know, has this thing ever seen a real world table? Or a real world query that needs to get data from numerous tables and run numerous functions and aggregations to get the proper result?
There's a dormant proposal about this: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-do-expressions
Sign bit determines signalling
lol, I don't have a PR team. None of those articles were solicited by me.
Cholesterol can not stick to artery walls without glucose! People on carnivore and ketogenic diets are some of the healthiest people in our society.
... which is... what they did.
Midjourney Imagines Programmer Archetypes
Broken is better than unreliable.
The influencers are not even creating the content and are just dropshipping the courses on dropshipping from another vendor.
I think I have some cognition issues, and can only read eink and off of crisp OLED. Love touch screens, pointers etc. But don't much like Apple iOS style.
When I was new, I saw one of my more experienced colleagues ask a few questions that together saved the company more than $1 mil each year. ChatGPT might be a threat to automate some low-level tasks or help eliminate bugs, but it is nowhere near ready to evaluate the context of a system, understand its history, or think* through the consequences of a major business decision.

* or think at all, in any meaningful way.
Whats special about intuition? Think you could rig up a similar system when your prediction confidence is low.
Yeah we can save, but can we ever afford a house? 1 bedroom condos go for a million dollars in some cities.

>So just don't live there

There's only so far away from the jobs you can go.
Yes I believe the poors ought to be able to drop bands on a well meaning idiot just as easily as the truck stop stripper.
> In this case it was already simd-friendly (adding a large number of floats).

So it was micro optimization afterall!
> I HAVE NO TOOLS BECAUSE I’VE DESTROYED MY TOOLS WITH MY TOOLS

Back when Craftsman tools had a no-questions-asked replacement guarantee, some friends of mine brought back a metallic blob, a former wrench that had "accidentally" shorted out a power line capacitor, and sheepishly said "it broke".

I sometimes thought about that wrench, when borrowing an o-scope from the EE's, in order to reliably debug some low-level instance of ex falso quodlibet.
It might be true that FTX customers would be better off with FTX still running with or without SBF. But that does not negate the fact that lending customer money to Almeda is capital F fraud.
One of my biggest complaints with most/all password managers is they don't have the concept of a higher security area. I'd love to put my TOTPs in Bitwarden, and only show them after another MFA prompt. I'd like to mark some sites to require MFA before giving the password too. Most security systems I've seen have the concept of multiple levels of security, where data can only move up by default. I'd like to see something similar in password managers.
We speak for more than one person and you should stop pretending otherwise.

Obviously not everyone can learn it quickly. That's a fact. Denying it is ruining the forum discourse.
Berkshire companies don't have outrageous compensation plans. There are plenty of companies that will perform well without the hundred million dollar motivation.
> No one in their right mind would use the word "solvency" to describe this.

No, you absolutely can. They were balance-sheet insolvent but cash-flow solvent from when they took the money until when people found out.
See also: Intel Management Engine exploits.

https://kakaroto.ca/2019/11/exploiting-intels-management-eng...
I recommend Anki. I've been learning flags (and capitals etc) ~1 year ago. After a few months break I have finished this game with a 97% accuracy (missed 5 countries). I would not get as good without multiple-choice, but it's still nice to see how many flags I did still recall.
Same thing with GitHub activity grid. I don’t even know what it’s supposed to tell. Even if I’m writing code everyday, that doesn’t mean I’m checking it in, and even if I was, I’m not doing it on a public repo or even on a GitHub hosted repo.
It's changed small online retail businesses. The vast majority of small businesses I interact with are not even retail.
What about "I can freely rip my own files"? Does the definition preclude that also?
> The Iñupiaq language has a base-20 numeral system, as do the other Eskimo–Aleut languages of Alaska and Canada (and formerly Greenland). Arabic numerals, which were designed for a base-10 system, are inadequate for Iñupiaq and other Inuit languages. To remedy this problem, students in Kaktovik, Alaska, invented a base-20 numeral notation

Nobody suggest this to the Danes, please.
> Expertise takes time to acquire. I’m skeptical of people who claim to be experts in too many things.

Someone does not like DevOps/Platform Engineers.
To be fair, AWS once had a global Route53 outage, which was effectively a global outage for anyone using AWS for DNS.
The claims of "solve NP problems in linear time" appear to come with a giant gotcha: they involve allowing the number of membranes to grow exponentially with the problem size! For instance, see:

https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/research/groups/CDMTCS/researc...

This seems like a huge problem for any electronic representation, since most any computational approach will deliver "super-Turing" results if you allow the machine to grow faster than the problem...
High energy vegan dude right here
The person you're replying to did not say "anybody". They said "people". In conversational English, the phrasing you quoted is not equivalent to "literally every single person who wants to read this article".

Maybe stop assuming absolutism where most people would never intend it? Interpret posts with the most charitable interpretation possible given what's written? (Y'know, like the HN guidelines require of us in order to keep conversations civil?)
Whose total compensation?

It seems like union jobs pay more [1].

[1]: https://www.google.com/search?q=avergae+union+wage+vs+non-un...
>>then used that credit to take loans from Alameda to line their own pockets with what was effectively FTX's customer deposits.

that's small fraction. most were spent and lost betting the crypto market
The point is that the ISA is assuming that BL and RET opcodes come in pairs - which is an assumption that does reflect what structured code is typically compiled down to. Going by the semantics of the opcodes themselves, there's no reason why RET should be treated differently from a simple indirect jump here.