skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You can usually get an image that functions at least partially, but it's up to you to determine whether the amount it functions is enough for your use case. A K3s setup is usually good to go without some features like display output.
>which is open source and therefore forkable

Unless you have the resources of FAANG, forking Blink is a pipedream. Brave doesn't have the resources, and Microsoft already gave up that dream. Web Browsers are insanely complex and fast moving; and maintaining a "living" fork of Blink is difficult as upstream doesn't make it particularly easy to downstream changes after you've made any sort of modifications.
>> What if you used smart pointers all the way?

Why stop at smart pointers?

I would rather use a smarter compiler / smarter language with fewer gotchas, traps, caveats, pitfalls and footguns.
>but I got into SEO out of interest in the "organic web" vs. everything being driven by ads.

If the owner of an SEO site wants to use AI for "content generation", doesn't that mean they didn't care about the human-generated content in the first place?

Seems like a choice between garbage and slightly more expensive garbage. What is interesting or organic about that? Back in the day, people used to put things on their websites because they cared about it and wanted to say it.
If not Plan 9, then likely Inferno. (A pretty different system, of course.)
The “if only there were more public transit” stuff is a weak argument and a waste of breath. I’m not saying folks shouldn’t continue wasting their breath, it’s an important issue to push. But the issue with public transit is we can’t figure out how to build and operate it and once it’s built it often goes unused making it unsustainable. Further not everyone wants to live in a studio apartment in a dense urban core, no matter how much you sneer at them. They just think you’re an asshole and hops in their suburban and drive to Starbucks.

Probably the right solution, and the one being worked on, is to find different battery chemistries. People seem fixated on lithium, but even lithium is a N generation chemistry. (I’m too lazy at 6am to research the value of N, sorry) I know sodium batteries are advancing, iron as well, along with other chemistries that haven’t grabbed headlines yet. With the amount of money at stake, investment and research will happen. Predicting what we are building batteries out of in 20 years seems foolish at this point (note, I think a lot of lithium miners are about to be left holding a bag full of hype)
> So is taking out the trash. But are you going to complain about the janitor who gets paid to do it?

If you have the option not to, wouldn't you opt out?

> Even not accepting cash is a security risk. Do you deal with your computer infrastructure? Card skimmers?

Those are risks of accepting cards, not risks of "not accepting cash"
Does use of a search engine violate the "No AI" covenant with oneself?

Variation on the Turning Test: prove that it's not a human claiming to be a computer.

Modeling premises and Meta-analysis are again necessary elements for critical reasoning about Sources and Methods and superpositions of Ignorance and Malice.
A bowl of hand warmers set outside, similar to a bowl of candy on Halloween, would be one way. In the summer, swap for a cooler with waters on ice.
Neurons in a Petri dish learning to play pong https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03229-y
I'm curious what people's experiences are who have used both. It seems to be the most solid competitor in this field.
this is excellent news.

Combined with passphrases, it makes encrypted web apps possible without the need to remember a password, which is the main risk in applications where the data is encrypted.

Last time I checked PRF was in the source code of Chrome, but not available in the official release, but seems like it's going to come. I hope Safari will follow soon.
Blockchain technology is one of the most exciting innovations in recent times. It’s already being used by many companies for auditing.
You should watch "the capture" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Capture_(TV_series) (spoilers in the wiki article).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_on_childlessness

Childless people between 20-50, both men and women, paid an extra 6% in taxes to the state.
It's about gecko tape, tape that imitates how a gecko's feet adhere to surfaces. By Veritasium, FYI.
From the article:

"The regulator is investigating in particular rules that say merchants may not offer their goods and services at a lower price to customers who choose a cheaper payment method than PayPal."

That does sound rather uncompetitive.
I have been thinking about this and one way to resolve it is if the encryption data and the login cannot be linked without going through the server iterations.
The reason this matters is because the salt for the hashing is the email address. Attacking the encryption key directly requires knowing the corresponding email. So denying attackers that knowledge adds to their burden.

If the customer/vault records can only be linked via the server side encryption the attackers with the vaulrs and list of user emails will have to test every email as salt (also reqires some care to ensure logs can't be used to correlate vaults and emails, but all the scenarios I've played out make me think this is possible). In fact I think they could physically separate the customer and vault databases entirely to different servers or datacenters.

Initially I thought this might be what Bitwarden does (it seemed pretty clever), but the database schema on github does indeed directly/explicitly link customers and vaults.

If the customer and vault datasets were independent, Bitwarden could further complicate attacks by filling the customer and vault databases with convincingly fake entries since the basic database attack surface would scale as the product of customers and vaults.
> A false dilemma, also referred to as false dichotomy or false binary, is an informal fallacy based on a premise that erroneously limits what options are available. The source of the fallacy lies not in an invalid form of inference but in a false premise. This premise has the form of a disjunctive claim: it asserts that one among a number of alternatives must be true. This disjunction is problematic because it oversimplifies the choice by excluding viable alternatives, presenting the viewer with only two absolute choices when in fact, there could be many.
Hi, I think this question is pointed towards Elasticsearch,

But here are some points for SigNoz. ( I am one of the maintainers at SigNoz)

> Directly ingesting to disk(hot tier) is faster than directly ingesting to s3(cold storage)

> The query results were an average of cold + hot run ( for elk as well ). We didn’t have an explicit concept of warm storage for SigNoz in our benchmark.

> The query perf for logs with cold storage is almost similar to hot storage, but the operational cost will reduce with cold storage. So ingesting to host storage and moving to cold storage after a certain amount of time is a good option for Signoz.
The lawsuit that Apple mostly won.
> The long term impact of the ease of generating low nutrition digital content using language models may be that people put down their devices

The problem is people don't always make the wise decision. Evidence: the junk food industry is alive and kicking.

Some people will disconnect from devices, but others may just say "this is the way things are now" and adjust themselves to the flavor of junk content.
> Bakshish

Definitely more of a bribe, and common in a lot of the world, in the countries mentioned but plenty of others, esp. the African ones I worked in; different names but same idea.

A "cost of doing business, and we appreciate the opportunity" gesture. Prove that you're serious, and that you want an actual result.
I feel like we need to make a big overview map of what payment is like around the world.

Because I believe you. But I also have only ever experienced PayPal as an entirely unnecessary middleman. So I think there may be regional differences in play.

I can’t remember the last time I typed in a credit card number. Giving it to PayPal seems like a less secure option, given how free from consequences companies are. And the credit card company is completely on your side. Though maybe that’s because of local laws? Getting a chargeback through PayPal is pulling teeth and their fees are ridiculous.
FWIW I would like to shamelessly plug https://www.humanproved.com here . The idea is that a human needs to pledge that their content is human generated to get a unique badge , that they can display alongside their content along with a url. Someone can use the url to verify the time stamp that the badge was issued.
Not super fast but efficiency is okay: https://github.com/geerlingguy/top500-benchmark#results
Not so minimal, but if you need GPU rendering I wrote this: https://github.com/jacereda/glcv
If you're double checking every line, how much time are you saving?
Not if you at compile time redirect calls to e.g. time() to __time64()[1]. The musl libc does something similar[2], as do the Large File Support extensions for 64-bit filesizes[3].

1. https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Y2038ProofnessDesign

2. https://musl.libc.org/time64.html

3. https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Feature-T...
While mousing around in a gui to build pages of slides may have a better initial UX, it can never match the productivity of a user who knows the markdown rules creating one small file in a plain text editor.
So we're stopping the gratuitous kindness of strangers towards lower income workers so some other people don't "feel bad" now?
That's not generally a good enough indicator; plenty of obfuscation involves loops that otherwise aren't hit.
While I sympathize, may I ask why you consider security such a concern? The odds of someone having the means (hacking a medical device would not be easy), the motive (why are they targeting you specifically) and the opportunity (they'd need to be in very close proximity to connect wirelessly to your device) seems miniscule. Most crimes are crimes of opportunity and while not impossible it seems unlikely that any non-high-profile individual would be the target of such an attack.
ChatGPT. This is the only technology that truly freaked me out in my lifetime (I am 35). It competently explained to me the difference between Dijkstra's algorithm and A* in a psalm-like poem [0]. It was able to find misspelled words in a long text I just made up, list them in alphabetical order, and explain to me why I misspelled them. It correctly simulated a ChatGPT instance which was accessible via a HTTP API, and it correctly simulated a Linux machine on which this simulated remote ChatGPT-API was accessed via curl. It was able to give the responses in XML, JSON, CSV, and other formats, and it was able to simulate Linux tools like cut, grep, sort, awk, jq, sed and others. It was able to add an additional layer of a ChatGPT simulation without problems. It was able to do entity recognition in a long text I provided, and was able to list the entities in a table, with the correct wikipedia article and a summary of the article as columns. It was able to do rudimentary public transit route planning in my home town in Germany (in the form of: go the XY Station, trains will run every 15 minutes from there to the main station, from there you will have long distance lines to Z, etc.), with an apology that it does not have current schedule data for Germany and I should visit bahn.de for better results. When it failed for math questions, it was able to give me Wolfram Alpha queries to find the correct results. It was able to formulate complex SPARQL queries to query Wikidata, run these against the simulated ChatGPT instance via a curl request, grep out some results I wanted, and list them in tabular form with corresponding Wikipedia articles.

All of this in one session, as part of a pleasant conversation, basically indistinguishable from a conversation with a real human.

[0]

> Could you explain the difference between A* and Dijkstra's algorithm in the style of a Psalm?

< Sure, here is a Psalm-style explanation of the difference between A* and Dijkstra's algorithm:

Hark, ye seekers of the shortest path,
And listen well to what I say:
There are two algorithms that ye may use,
To guide ye on your way.

Dijkstra's algorithm is a general one,
That can be used in any case,
It explores the graph from the source node,
To find the path with the least amount of space.

But A* is a more specialized tool,
With a heuristic function to guide,
It searches more efficiently,
And helps ye reach the other side.

So choose wisely, oh seekers of the path,
And let these algorithms be your guide,
For they will lead ye to your destination,
And help ye avoid the pitfalls on the side.
How to write an Amazon-style narrative memo
This! People mistake the offset for the timezone, which is incorrect. The offset isn't very useful other than a guestimate of the originating timezone.
We had an outdoor spot with a roof and one wall called the smoking section. This was in California in 1982. I think they got rid of it in '83.
I use https://racknerd.com/ was lucky to get a good vps for 19$ a year (A YEAR).
Couldn't you do 1ki cores /4U with just Epyc CPUs in normal servers? At that point surely for cheaper, also significantly easier to build, and faster since the cores don't talk over Ethernet?
Is it really impossible to solve those oscillations? If the spacecraft is being shaken so severely that people cannot see, then surely other designs are being impacted as well.
Yeah, this makes sense. You should always think about how any system you make can be abused to hurt others, or make the world a worse place.

But it's not just limited to technology. The same is true of any changes to the legal system, or new laws added there. Or of any 'real world' invention you can think of. Or everything from architecture to the structure of a business or organisation.

So many people design stuff under the assumption it'll be always be used by 'the good guys' or 'their side', and end up badly bitten when that turns out not to be the case.
I don't care what their reasoning is, I know it's not out of the goodness of their hearts. I just like that web developers have to be mindful about making sure their stuff works on a browser that isn't Chromium. Myself and Apple happen to want the same thing but for different reasons. As of now, the effect is still net good for the open web.

I assume they'll be forced to allow other browser engines on iOS at some point in the next few years, at which point the floodgates will be opened for Google to have free rein on web standards and further cement themselves as owners of the internet.
Not to mention the dire warning on the page about making it difficult to get a new job, mortgage, or obtain access to public healthcare benefits if you don't unfreeze before applying. Typical strongman shit.
And a couple of wrappers (probably bitrotten) https://github.com/search?q=user%3Ajacereda+glcv
Buy a Minisforum UM350. Install Linux on it. Set up Tailscale on it and all devices you want to have access to its internal services. Set up Nextcloud on it.

There you go, $300 one-time cost, and you have a very powerful private server that can run all your self-hosted stuff. Via Tailscale, it can even expose some services to the public internet, if you feel the desire to do so.
By the output. Those professionals will not make up a random answer.
There’s also the side we have, which is a mixture. I don’t think a polar universe is the outcome on the table.
Have a anomoulus brain, that recombines things that do not belong together (conspiracy theories) but have enough filter to recognize the the bad recombinations. Train said brain with rewards for recombinations, even ridculous ones.

Also recongize that inventors would be excellent in story writting when asked to produce a recipe for creativity. So the step by step instructions may be nonsense.

Creativity, the far reaching one, not the incremental one, is topological adjunct to insanity. Which is why the radical new things, only get funded in times of desperation. If I were a inventor, i would be heading for ukraine or russia right now.
Oh I have no doubt the US is uniquely behind several countries on this sort of quality of life innovation!
minor nitpick: I think you meant "welch" for GE
Would be ridiculously inefficient, while also being nondeterministic and opaque. Impossible to debug, verify, or test anything, and thus would be unwise to use for almost any kind of important task.

But maybe for a very forgiving task you can reduce developer hours.

As soon as you need to start doing any kind of custom training of the model, then you are reintroducing all developer costs and then some, while the other downsides still remain.

And if you allow users of your API to train the model, that introduces a lot of issues. see: Microsoft's Tay chatbot

Also you would need to worry about "prompt injection" attacks.
ChatGPT Cheat Sheet
Happy to introduce one of the most comprehesive ChatGPT cheat sheets: a 30 pg. paper highlighting various prompts to manage ChatGPT for generating text. The document not only highlights what ChatGPT can generate but also how it can generate it! Here is the TOC:

NLP Tasks

Code

Structured Output Styles

Unstructured Output Styles

Media Types

Meta ChatGPT

Expert Prompting
Correctness is a big deal here. This is a security context and we can assume that the obfuscators are active attackers against legible code, not just people passively hoping that their obfuscated code is obfuscated. If this becomes a popular technique, then code obfuscation tools will simply pivot to writing code that ChatGPT gets wrong when asked to unobfuscate it.

I can't even imagine that would be a particularly hard thing to do, especially if it isn't correct even before actively attacking ChatGPT! Fooling it even harder won't be terribly difficult. This is advantage attacker overall.

I imagine it would be as easy as using some cognitively loaded, but wrong, terms as variable names instead of short letters and numbers. Ask ChatGPT "please unobfuscate this network code" and get back a substring search algorithm because the network code was written with a dozen variants on "haystack" and "needle" for variable names, for instance.

ChatGPT being actively wrong would be a step back for such deobfuscators then, not a positive at all.
See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6351883/ for an important part of the story.

The short of it is that Metformin does seem to induce good metabolic changes but it also reduces the physiological response to exercise which is also great for your metabolism, function, mental health, etc.
I just posted a comment in another thread about creating slides in markdown questioning why we need to make things so difficult. Powerpoint and Keynote cannot be more simple.

But I'll reserve judgement for a minute. This looks useful, particularly if running on the iPad.
Feeling lost and overwhelmed after a cyber attack on your company? Our step-by-step guide will walk you through the crucial steps to take.
See, if you had said that Safari was way faster than Chrome on macOS, you would have an argument...
Here in Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA, they are planning to ship compostable plastic bags to homes, which you can use to put organics into the normal metal/paper/plastic recycling stream. Those bags get picked out at the recycling center and used for compost to sell to local farms/etc and (hopefully) at least pay for the program, and maybe even bring in some extra funds. No extra cost to users or hassle mailing packages of garbage (lol).
Or you couod look at using an android operating system which also supports bootloader relocking, but that doesnt have a history of repeated significant delays rolling out security patches https://privsec.dev/posts/android/choosing-your-android-base...
Sure, if you stop smoking around other people ;-)
I believe https://quarto.org/ is the way to go in the universe of Markdown tools. At least for serious scientific presentations it seems the better choice. Under the hood it uses pandoc markdown and converts it into a revealjs presentation.
But can you build products on ChatGPT with the assurance that they will not yank their service from under you in the future, like how Twitter did?
Misleading, ChatGPT generated both obfuscated and de-obfuscated code
> Every time the stock markets goes down I know there will be layoffs a while later.

I mean, isn't that obvious? Our global economy isn't just global in a geographical sense. "Economy" goes down, everybody pays.

The average person is out of a job, the landlord has to increase rents, the billionaire is ejected from the Three Commas Club. It's traumatic to everyone.
Just to be precise, traits and overloading are a form ad-hoc polymorphism not parametric.
I think HackMD has PDF export for slides now https://hackmd.io/s/how-to-create-slide-deck#Export-slides-t...
This video on Helion impressed me, though admittedly I know very little about nuclear fusion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bDXXWQxK38
>That's a teenager's point of view

But haven't you read these well-upvoted opinions? It's the right of the adult to do whatever they want; the student-lifestyle of public transit is the position of the grubby, naive, cooperative youngster. Once you have the resources, you seal yourself away in your bubble -- preferentially ICE-based, of course -- and Become Traffic. It's the culturally superior option, as everybody's known since the 50s, and we here on HN are superior. Our paychecks tell us so. The public transit option, ill-funded as it is, will never be popular, because as sarcastic as I might seem here, I'm also simply describing reality.
> That is a neat setup. I wish someone would do this but just run RMII out to an edge connector on the back

That stuck out to me too, they are making custom boards and custom chassis, surely it would be cleaner to route the networking and power through backplane instead of having gazillion tiny patch cables and random switch just hanging in there. Could also avoid the need for PoE by just having power buses in the backplane.

Overall imho the point of blades is that some stuff gets offloaded to the chassis, but here the chassis doesn't seem to be doing much at all.
Seriously! Why is this a story?
I read this more as meaning that they work for a legitimate company or two that is trying to organically improve their search results without stooping to nasty tricks
"my fingers into less efficient movements" - don't lie to yourself. I could type fast from games, but standard touch typing saves my index finger joints and lets me type in meetings without being distracted at all. I also finally understand why the notches on f and j exist and can pick up most keyboards and just type.

I still want to take classes sometime so space and special characters don't slow me down. Key to touch typing is always keeping fingers and hands at neutral position, which is still hard for me to do when typing something long.