skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I use komacv (see here: https://www.ctan.org/pkg/komacv) it works fine and looks great, I had to reduce the margins to but a bit more content in there though. I'll maybe try to do my CV as a single HTML/CSS page in the future though.
The more life experience I have the more I conclude that assessing the existence and extent of someone's fault is a pointless exercise. People tend to exhaust enormous amounts of pointless energy stuck in that place.

Your last sentence drives it home. They deserve compassion. Who cares about subjective assessment of fault once you reach that conclusion?
There's no backplane - all power and communication goes through a front-facing ethernet port. Kind of defeats the purpose of a blade form factor IMO.
I am a business owner who has never taken funding and has no interest in venture capital until they line up around the block to pitch me.
This seems like such a massively strong negative signal about the quality of Canonical's operations its almost laughable!

I would love to see their (data centric) justification for this kind of screening. (I highly doubt there is one)
The yaybahar. It really sounds like there are electronics involved, but no:

> Yaybahar is an electric-free, totally acoustic instrument designed by Gorkem Sen. The vibrations from the strings are transmitted via the coiled springs to the frame drums. These vibrations are turned into sound by the membranes which echo back and forth on the coiled springs. This results in an unique listening experience with an hypnotic surround sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aY6TxC1ojA
Your argument collapses to "forget improvement, let me externalize", and we as a society have strong reasons to provide a glide path towards reducing those externalities for old construction (which we do through updates during renovations, rebates, etc.) while disallowing them for new.
OTOH it changes dramatically with time and certain topics seem to end up below the fold, even if its a couple hours old post with a lot of engagement. I wish there was a chronological sort with a threshold vote filter, I guess I can get that from hnrss though.
I didn't want to get into the pros and cons of over-hiring. but there are definitely some of each. Big con is people don't like getting laid off, and some would not have joined, taken other jobs had they known. A pro is that it really cranked up salaries for most people hired during a labor shortage, including those who aren't laid off.

That said, I think it is all beside my main question: Are shareholders unhappy with executive leadership. If I were an executive, I would be making the case (privately) that my over-hiring and subsequent layoffs were in fact GOOD for the company.
>on my main desktop with an nVidia GPU and the proprietary driver

Why are you doing this to yourself.

There are options that have quality open source drivers and quality NDA-free documentation, and you are aware of this.
Prison creates absolute animals. We shouldn't put people in prison unless they're going to be there for their entire lives. Singapore-style caning is probably much better for both the convict and the broader society -- take the incorrigible violent criminals and lock them up for life without parole, and cane the rest.
I am sure I can park the train in my garage.
This also assumes that PagerDuty's hiring process is so shitty that 1 in 5 of their hires suck. In that case there's no guarantee they'll hire better talent, lol
> recruiters aren't just there to hire for developers

Most companies I've interviewed at over the years (basically all but the smallest startups) have had dedicated recruiters for developers; different people hired sales or marketing or other roles. This doesn't mean that they should be expected to be technical experts, but I do think it's interesting that the box-checking type of interviews rather than just having a genuine conversation also seem to be more common the larger the company is. It's probably not surprising, since the need for standardizing interviews is higher when you have a larger number of people performing the interviews, but it's a little ironic that the most boilerplate interviews I've had were all with recruiters who specifically only interview developers.

Then again, I also tend to get bounced around to different recruiters far more frequently with the larger companies. There have been times I've been passed around to half a dozen recruiters within the span of a month or so; one makes the initial contact, then another talks to me on the phone, then another coordinates my technical interview schedule, and then another actually gives me the offer, who then refers me to one final other recruiter to actually respond yes or no (and maybe negotiate if possible). I know some of these are probably a more entry-level position that I've seen referred to as "recruiting coordinators" rather than full-fledged recruiters (meaning that they often handle the logistics like scheduling but don't perform interviews themselves), but it still feels absurd to have to talk to so many different people for basically the same thing. My impression is that it's somewhat intentionally trying to put me at a disadvantage by making it impossible for me to carry over any expectations from one step to the next (e.g. one recruiter might say something about compensation or benefits and then the next one conveniently doesn't know what I'm talking about and can claim that no one would have told me that).
It’s because bioengineering does not yet result in huge capital outputs and productivity gains that other engineering fields enable abstractly.

Once that happens and the existing underemployed bio-scientists are printing money through wealth/value creation, you will get your 20x.
That's illegal in some countries and PG operates in the UK too. I've seen a tech writer being made redundant, then the same company was looking for a tech writer 7 months later. Fired guy won big money for unfair redundancy.
> way better than the credit cards of old

They were more secure (no surprise there). The lack of security was known, but the risk was with the vendor who generally accepted it as cost of doing business. With the more secure EC cards like with the new-ish chip-enhanced CC, the (lower, remaining) risk is with the customer. Not sure, whether that is 'better'.
My high school math teacher went crazy on me when I withdrew from the math olympiad prep class due to scheduling conflicts with assembler language class in my first year and then did everything possible for me to fail over the next 4 years. Not sure how would that teacher bear hearing I made it to top schools despite their best efforts...
Congratulations!

> I live in a top-tier city for this kind of medical attention

What city is that, if you don't mind?
And now we're into John Deere levels of "fuck you, pay me" whenever anything breaks.

No thanks. The secondary repair market is extremely important to keep on life support.

If you cede all repair work to manufacturer blessed shops the amount of waste and expense skyrockets.

I want patched together laptops working 12 years from now, just like I have old T-series laptops from back in the day with various replacement parts humming away right now in my homelab. It's silly to just toss everything in the trash the moment is breaks.
SSR is fairly desirable for some apps, especially ones that have parts that have significant static content. That might be linked to from elsewhere. Think like a blog.

On such a site SSR not only can mean faster time to content for new viewers (especially with server side caching, but even without your server may well be faster than a low end mobile device), but it also means that some basic sight functionality like navigation might even work with JavaScript disabled. (For that, you simply need to ensure navigation uses `<a href="..."` tags, with JavaScript click handler that intercepts clicks and hands them off to the router. People with JavaScript disabled will make a server request, which will SSR the new destination and return it, which is better than having literally nothing work in that scenario.)

Indeed, next.js is really about allowing you to use react to make more of a classic server rendered site that supports progressive enhancements (client components), but using react just an SPA. They even prefer a server side router. This has advantages like the JavaScript code bundle downloaded by the browser being much smaller, as only the code for client components is needed, while all other components are server rendedered only, so don't need to be in the client bundle.

If in practice everybody comes to one url for your app, people come specifically to interact rather than for content (so time to content being visible is not an important metric, while time to interactivity is important) then sure SSR and next.js are probably not really useful for you.
This basically means: You need to be young; older people should not apply.

Being of an older age is not a protected class, so they are able to do this.
ChatGPT is trained on those same SEO spam blog posts, so I'm not sure how it solves the fundamental problem. People aren't going to create content for corporate giants to vacuum up as training material for their AI
You're right, I forgot.

Competent hiring managers look for folks with 10 years experience with React, C#, Java, DevOps, Embedded C++ Development, Mobile cross platform dev and ofc Rust for good measure, each.

We have long forgotten about doing one thing and doing it right.
Yes, but now that I look at it, it seems like Apple’s old school widget all got removed in favor of the new ones. For example, I can’t see the “old school” battery widget!
you know you’re rich when
Had a hard time using MANY existing React ui components from various packages. I guess it is fast but the work involved in trying to build anything more interactive is not worth it just to shape 2-3-10ms. I can't find a plus for using this over something like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) for example.
My focus was on the word "straightforward" more so than trying to argue that HN isn't "capitalism".

It's definitely capitalism, and arguably highly effective at that, I just don't think it's "straightforward" is all.
A larger company would likely separate out "new grads" and give them the stupid high school questions.
Denmark is at the threshold of the Baltic sea. Anyone who, like the Carthaginians, could have sailed to the Baltic sea would get there via the North Sea (or down the Oder River). Such quibbling is beneath you.

Carthaginian influence might or might not be more relevant than Tartessian. It depends on the facts. Explorers are much less likely to affect origins of a script than settlers or refugees who were there at the formative time. Has anyone suggested a Tartessian influence, or are you just making shit up?

Hostility to revisiting old conclusions in the face of new facts is anti-science, but common, maybe moreso in history than in other fields.
I was just going to post this, AR glasses are getting really impressive, although I tried to get a pair and almost all companies are either in the "Coming Soon" stage or perpetually out of stock.

Also tried getting the enterprise Google Glasses but it's difficult getting them as a hobbyist.
That guy is not objective as his life depends on good will of russian govt. I think he is playing "nicest" possible according to conditions he lives in, but at the end he has to "bend".

Russia have a lot of difficulties with transferring money to and from abroad so it is kind of "natural" way for them to go into "promoting" something that can't be that easily controlled and tracked (yet).
This reads like you are suggesting that Calvinism is the same as early Christianity. There was no single organized Christian belief to speak of, and very likely what organization there was looked nothing like the church of 16th century Geneva let alone that of 18th to 21st century America.
Possible solution: when an self-driving car is entering a situation where it is likely to stop suddenly, and it is being followed too closely, flash the brake lights rapidly, even though moving forward.
I suppose it could just be 2-3 jobs and fit in one page. But 4 jobs is not uncommon, and for me, the 4th job is what got bumped to the second page.

You could have an entire discussion about how long people should stay at their jobs, but I don’t think it’s unusual to see someone with 4+ jobs in 10 years on their résumé, and it’s not ipso facto a red flag. I also have a small number of non-work projects which belong on my résumé. People will also put non-industry work experience on their résumé.
The acronym is large language model (LLM) because the existing models are language models with millions or billions of weights.
I tried and failed in the past. Doing a standard mid-size corporate job now for stability.

I picked "I am thinking of doing a startup or new business in the future" as I intend to try again one day.
It was a magical machine. I remember programming a chess game in Pascal, and all the API calls were like a hundred characters long.
Its just getting revved up :)
I don't think your analogy holds here; Instagram was already an active and popular social network before Facebook acquired it, not a "camera app." Did it grow? Certainly. While we don't know what would have happened to it had FB not bought it, it's quite possible FB bought it precisely because it was growing and becoming 'cool.'
People First is still wildly different from "we are family". The former implies treating people with respect as humans versus entries in a spreadsheet, whereas the latter implies nothing can ever separate your bond. I see nothing wrong with people first on their about page. What part do you take issue with?

(Dutonians is cheeky, but a reasonable standin for stodgy 'PagerDuty Employees')
But at what scope? The how will always matter. Your AI could design a system that bankrupts you on the first day. To prevent that you need to specify constraints and it's turtles all the way down. It would free you from spending time on areas you don't care about, but that's already true with SaaS.
FMM?
These are not customers, but rather companies that use similar technologies.
Google, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon CEOs: “Yeah, we are doing layoffs, that’s totally my fault and I take the whole blame.” - they cut 10-15% of workforce, no repercussions for them

Apple CEO: “no layoffs here, but maybe cut my salary by 40%”

And yes, I know $50 million is couch change for Tim Apple
Agreed. As if we're 4 times closer now than during the Cuban missle crisis...
People care because it shows that Apple (and Tim Cook) are listening to their shareholders.
And with Datadog's reputation, it's almost a guarantee it will be even more overpriced than Pagerduty.
Furhat is a social robot: It's basically a humanoid head that sits on a desk, and people are supposed to interact with it as a person.
Consuming and producing vast amounts of information is what makes the problem potentially worse than human groupthink. It enables the situation where AI is mostly consuming information produced by AI. That's the feedback loop I'm calling "groupthink." It could end up diverging from reality in the same way that chaotic functions diverge widely due to tiny differences in the initial conditions. The same problem exists if the AI consumes other types of information that it also produces.

Humans are more grounded by having a presence in the physical world. Plus they draw on various sources considered more reliable, like formal training, scientific papers, textbooks, quality journalism, etc. If we want AI to be reliable, we'll need it to put the most weight on similar sources, and maybe even have some real-world presence with sensors and robots.

Eventually AI will be able to produce new reliable information itself. But for that, it would have to recognize factual inconsistencies between sources and logical inconsistencies in arguments, and figure out how to resolve those, and do math correctly. I don't know what the state of the art is here, though ChatGPT tends to fail at basic arithmetic.
Do anything about it like change the world? Probably not. Like get a settlement? Absolutely. There are a lot of JDs from Google Law School on this site and in the interest of not appearing as one, just look into plaintiff side employment law firms in your area. But disparate impact and disparate treatment are different and both are grounds for a lawsuit. A policy asking about high school GPA when we know there’s no good reason to ask that is taking steps towards a prima facie case of the former under US law, but especially in California if that’s where you are. Even in hiring this is very close to a no no here.
How has Earth's core stayed as hot as the Sun's surface for billions of years?
These machines are still insanely fast. If you actually notice anything get substantially slower, you are either running very specialized workloads or you can forward the blame right to the developer of said application.
I recognize what you are describing and I actually think that its predisposition to doing this has become worse in the past week or so.
And absolutely nothing came of browser bundling in the US.

The major case was more about MS forcing OEMs to buy licenses for Windows whether the computers shipped with Windows or not.
That's a great idea. I normally use https://www.spreeder.com/app.php but will try this!
The dentine on the inside of a tusk is what is carved out and called Ivory. The value of Ivory was because it could be carved easily and looked nice, and increasingly because of its rarity. The Ivory inside a tusk has no more value than the dentine inside your teeth - that is, it is a mundane part of the body. Why would someone call their product dentine? Is it a mundane, hidden part of a larger organism? Or is it because, once carved out, Ivory is rare and expensive? Please try to find a reason that it makes sense of an application to be called Ivory that is not because it still has connotations of value.

The Ivory trade is disgusting. Anything that continues to promote Ivory as a positive is disgusting.

Update: I think the two folks replying are making my point for me. If your product is a sugar-free gum that is good for teeth, then for sure call it Dentyne.
This just demonstrates that shareholders do have a say, which presumably is how it should be.
This seems mostly to be a gesture towards some approximation of solidarity with staff during a time of mass layoffs in the industry.

And I think it's a good move, if only to help make apple staff feel slightly more comfortable in their jobs. And help keep productivity and timelines on track.
It is not like you have choice anyway. Insurance companies won't pay for brand name drugs if a generic exists.
Well, can Meta provide search engine ads for my company that use the expensive Google ones?
What is the Cyber Resilience Act and why it’s important for Open Source
Apologies for hijacking the thread, although other WINE users may have encountered the same problem: ancient software refusing to install due to wrong free space variable size.
Some very very old installers (don't ask :^) from the early 2k if not late 90s report negative free disk space before failing, very likely because they expect a shorter variable as disk free size, probably wrongly defined in the code as signed variable, and are served a longer value they can't use, so the number wraps to negative values.
I tried to mount very small partitions but that didn't work, presumably because the variable is still being overwritten by another wrong size one, so it would need a WINE patch, which is beyond my skills. Given however that WINE is being also used to run historical software that Windows refused to run ages ago, I wonder if that feature is already present and I just missed it.
https://simplespectrogram.app/
The best way to see if someone will perform well at a job, is to have them do that job and see. The second best way is to ask them for proof they succeeded at a similar job. That proof is usually a combination of references and a discussion about work they did at the previous job.

If you can't do any of those things, like for some recent grads, then the next best predictors of job performance are going to be psychometrics, specifically IQ and trait conscientiousness. Colleges heavily select for these traits during admissions, but less so with the actual course work. These traits are most predictive when you expect to teach a person the job on the job, with their prior experience being irrelevant.

So it's not that there is no evidence for these questions being useful. It's just that there are usually better signals on offer.
Now I'm starting to wonder if Elon's tweets aren't him just testing ChatGPT.
Loved the "BREAKING: ..." as if we should all drop what we're doing and pay attention to "more to come".
Tweetbot was a great product I was happy to give money too. I'll probably feel the same way about Ivory.
Someone tried to rob me at gunpoint many years ago. Pointed a gun to my head when I got a flat tire innocently trying to bike home from a bad part of town. Why was I in a bad part of town? Working in a hospital with the people helping the people in a bad part of town.

I didn't try to kill them, even though I managed to fight the upper hand off of them. When the scuffle ended all I said was "don't point things at my head."

Choose to believe me or not. Don't make presumptions about eagerness.
They should look at how Dokka does this for Kotlin. It's kind of builds on the same conventions and syntax and plugs into the same infrastructure for deploying documentation along with jar files (i.e. maven). So it use the same @return, @param and so on tags and a few Kotlin specific ones.

Some differences:

- obviously it supports markdown and does the obvious things with that. Particularly using code blocks for examples is nice.

- you can refer to parameters and other things inline, so you don't have to have a separate line for each parameter or the return value but you can write something like "Returns the square root of [myparam]". No need to spell out @return or @param myparam

- it encourages to write short documentation. You don't have to list each parameter for example. If it is obvious from the signature, it won't force you to spell out that the parameter number is indeed an Int. That's a good thing, a lot of Javadoc is just spelling out things that are obvious and skipping all the not so obvious things.

- it has github markdown as an output options. Nice in combination with a static site generator or github sites.
Did Microsoft just abandon the HoloLens, VR, and the metaverse?
It does indeed, look up yabridge. I have been able to do it almost entirely issue free for many plugins (and even better, I can still keep a low sample rate).
can't you just mix bleach with ethanol?
Canonical's model is to copy Debian testing, change the branding and apply some set of patches to it, then ship it. Every six months or so they pick up the new Debian testing and repeat.

Debian is solid. Ubuntu's layer on top is a bit ymmv.
A few years ago I worked at a place that wanted to implement "Life Story Interviews." I had the experience of several candidates responding, basically, WTF?? and hanging up.
I recently setup PhotoPrism[0] on my NAS and am happy with it.

0: https://photoprism.app/
> What if they are laying off to make room for better developers?

If they are firing people for performance reasons during their normal performance review cycle, it's not really a layoff.
The candidate would go right to the top of the stack. They call bullshit when they see it.
They sell in several vertices, they can start by separating them (eg youtube ads, gmails ads, search result ads, ads on 3rd party websites)
> Clone the repo into a public GitHub repository (to comply with AGPLv3. To clone in a private repository, acquire a commercial license)

The AGPL won't save you from folks modifying/reselling your software. And if someone was non compliant, are you going to pay the lawyer fees to prove it?

I wish companies would stop using "open source" as a growth strategy.
And that means they are beyond constructive criticism?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L23akTkDqTM&t=79s :)