skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well, I didn't say that opt-out was the way to go, but that it would be better than nothing, which is what they have right now.

You seem to be making a very convoluted argument that eventually boils down to 'because it is useful it must be right', aka an argument from utility. But copyright law has time and again been proven to be highly resilient against such arguments. You either have rights or you don't and in a moment of clairvoyance the people that came up with the current incarnation decided that it is such an important thing that it gets bestowed upon creation. No registration required (though it can help). Just making something and boom you have a bunch of rights which you can only contract out of.

I don't think any utilitarian argument that results in the creation of new works based on the works of others will make those rights go away.

I've read your other comments and I see that this tool is useful to you but don't be persuaded so easily by the utility: If I stole your work and passed it off as my own it might be very useful to society, especially if I re-licensed it under more permissive terms or even placed in the public domain. But I would be clearly infringing on your rights. You may in fact not be in a position to claim these works as your creation.

The fact that 'my' work has a few hundred or even a few thousand such inputs rather than just one does not change the principle: I did not create the work, and that is the bit that really matters, unless you are creating a work it doesn't matter if you have the equivalent of a bitcoin tumbler for art at your disposal to pretend that you have created a work. You did not. The fact that you used a tool that obfuscates attribution and overrules the licensing terms of the original copyright holders does not mean that you can claim your hands are clean: you know exactly what is going on behind the scenes.

Personally I won't go within a mile of these tools to create work that I put my name under .
How do you ban ChatGTP if most kids in the US have cellphones these days?
> People are afraid of actually using their batteries, and engaging in FUD about their aging. It's weird.

And some of the same people change cars a year later (talking about EVs, of course — because it doesn't have HW4, 4680s, etc.). Some of it is human nature, though.
Absolutely agree. but "liquid markets are important" or something. rolls eyes

This is just another step in the endless journey of widening the gap between your average Joe and someone with access to high level financial services.
Ask HN: Simple programming problems that ChatGPT can't solve
Access to ChatGPT is now allowed for anyone. Also, it is very good at solving programming problems at a level that are good exercises for beginners. Students may use it to solve problems like 4th graders use calculators for math problems and skip the joy of the learning process.

I wonder what would be a good list of interesting programming problems that are good for developing programming skills and hard for ChatGPT to solve.

Anyone knows any?
What if Nixon hadn't recorded his conversations at all though? What if spies had wiretapped his office and recorded it?

Those are important nuances to consider as well and different people will change their answer with those changes even though all 3 cases we have potential access to his conversations.
This sounds great, but I don't think Rust has the complement of highly skilled core developers needed to tackle something this ambitious. I'm a close observer of the Rust project, and my impression is that Rust's core development team has been hollowed out over the past few years - there's been a string of quiet departures, which sadly included some of the most powerful contributors. The Rust project is quite secretive and opaque about its internal politics, so I don't know if there's any unified reason for the attrition, and I don't think it's useful to try to read the tea leaves. At this point, I'm just keen to be reassured that Rust has the momentum to complete things like async and shore up holes in the type system on a reasonable timescale.
Thanks! Karaoke can work here (in Koreantown). Arcades (you mean video arcades, right?) have kind of disappeared, though there are a couple left. In past years "ciberes" were potentially feasible; those are businesses where you pay by the hour to use an internet-connected PC, similar to a "PC bang". I've done meetups in the park, with or without picnics, but not barbecue. Bars do exist. Any other ideas?
Is that you, Bobby Tables?
How to do a Cofounder Breakup while maintaining value
Hello,
My company has not achieved product market fit and we are still iterating through ideas. We decided with my cofounder that we are better off breaking up. We both want to continue building a company independently. We still have 400k in the bank. What’s the best way to breakup maintaining the highest amount of capital possible?
The system wasn't designed to be able to learn either.
In fact, that's exactly why cargo's default for dev builds is -O0: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch14-01-release-profiles.html...
It would actually be such an amazing language if it wasn’t so verbose. There are so many places where more concise syntax wouldn’t even hurt safety and they forgo it anyways. But here we are, where macros are required for a hello world.
Google Cloud Run (with Dockerfiles) + CloudSQL (Postgres) + Cloud Tasks.

On the back-end, NestJS with Typescript plus some query builder such as Knex (TypeORM is pretty buggy). Or maybe even try Prisma.

For front-end it depends. I would try using just Vanilla JS with Tailwind if possible or fallback to React + Tailwind if there are too many screens, or they need a lot of updates based on state.

Those are mostly technologies I'm comfortable with because I use them every day. However, if I have the option to waste time researching and/or learning, I would research the state of server-side Kotlin and learn Elixir/Phoenix before making a decision. NestJS can ge too verbose sometimes.
Precisely. It is never just one error. At a minimum two and if you really stare at this sort of thing long enough it isn't rare at all to discover a whole chain of them. The only difference with all the times that it went right is that this time everything was aligned 'just so'.
There is literally no useful information in this article.

It could be summed up as "everything people have been told is bullshit and we don't know what isn't".

What a waste of time.
But AI companies are paying AI artists with electricity and computing power so they are buying copyright from AI artists. ;)
My point is you're ignoring the fact that the bar association has a distinct interest in having the courts run smoothly and making sure lawyers in court are competent. So it is highly in their interest for a courtroom to not become a mockery because of a chatbot.

Not everything associations like the bar does is in bad faith or contrary to the public's interest.
I sense there was probably some irony in your post. Nevertheless, I'll bite :)

The "XMPP camp" is doing well and very busy: https://xmpp.org/newsletter/

We're lacking a nostr bridge if anyone wants to work on that...
Fly.io will convert your docker image to a firecracker[^1], a microVM engine based on KVM.

[^1]: https://firecracker-microvm.github.io/
Galaga, Pac-Man, Donkey Kong Emulator for ESP32
Galaga is one of the most iconic arcade machines of all times. It has been remade and emulated many times. So far the cheapest and smallest system able to do a faithful emulation of the original arcade machine was the raspberry pi. But even the much cheaper ESP32 should be able to easily emulate a machine from the early 80's, shouldn't it?
Ooooooh... Whoosh. Missed that the first time. undown/upvote
SQLite3 is in every phone and every laptop and... Do Apple, Google, etc. have to do something special in order to use SQLite3 in Germany? Have there been any court cases about this? Have there been any fines issued or paid over this? IMO the whole Germany-doesn't-have-public-domain thing is just FUD.
I'm seeing a lot of people not quite understanding what nostr is. I know it can be hard considering this is a crowd focused on products and frameworks and paradigms and what not.

It's not a "twitter alternative", it's not "federated like mastodon", it's not even social networking. It's just a spec for a signed message format and a relay server, that's it. It's very, very simple, you generate a key, sign a message, send it to whichever relays you want, it serves them to requestors or not, depending on what it wants to do. That is literally all it is.
- NextJS

- Tailwind

- Hasura / postgres

- DigitalOcean - docker droplet

- Caddy

- Cloudflare
Isn't there an API?
I think it is called uBlacklist (not the same guy as uBlock). I don't have my computer with me so can't check.
Thank you! I didn't know this subtle difference.
I was looking into that, looks like they have an API but it's limited to 10k requests per day, and TOS says you can't blend the results with other sources.
They assume extra mileage to seek out charging stations and also opportunity costs for added driving and charging time. YMMV lol.
I have an unusual outcome? You're grasping at straws, name calling, and making a ton of assumptions with literally zero data. I'll budge an inch, sure, if your partner is going to need long term hospice care, I can understand why you might move on, but that's not the case for most fully disabled people and families. You're basically saying if you lost the ability to walk and it inconveniences me I'm bailing on you. That's a weak marriage, it's might even be the definition of a weak marriage. I don't think sticking with your partner through thick and thin is abnormal.

Do you not understand the premise of the most common wedding vow ever to be spoken? "for better or for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health." That's just a fancy way of saying I'll love you for who you are because I'm not transactional.

Honestly, your marriage sounds like a sociopaths dream. How many points and transactions can I earn so my partner thinks I actually care. You also lied about your data for some silly reason. Anyway, I'm gonna take my upvotes and move on. You have a great day.
> An AI is not a person, and therefore can't be sanctioned for practicing law - my take anyway.

"Personhood" in a legal sense doesn't necessarily mean a natural person. In this case, the company behind it is a person and is practicing law (so no pro se litigant using the company to generate legal arguments). In addition, if you want something entered into court, you need a (natural person) lawyer to do it, who has a binding ethical duty to supervise the work of his or her subordinates. Blindly dumping AI-generated work product into open court is about as clear-cut an ethical violation as you can find.

To your larger point, law firms would love to automate a bunch of paralegal and associate-level work; I've been involved in some earlier efforts to do things like automated deposition analysis, and there's plenty of precedent in the way the legal profession jumped on shepardizing tools to rapidly cite cases. Increased productivity isn't going to be reflected by partners earning any less, after all.
Funny thing. I actually got depression/burnout when I was preparing to run a half-marathon (I do it yearly).

It pissed me to no end that the couple people who got to know about it basically told me to "just exercise more and do volunteer work and it will go away", even when I told them that it was caused by work-related stress.
Looks heavily inspired by youneedabudget (YNAB). Accurate? I assume it is, since you offer an "import" from YNAB.

Did you start creating this after YNAB launched their higher prices or what was the impetus?

I have my doubts about there not being a dedicated app on the phone. The most important feature of YNAB is being able to easily add transactions and since you are going the route of no automated import, manual transaction adding from mobile will be CRITICAL to get perfect.

YNAB's solution is really, really good in that space. How does yours compare?
Does this mean I could use a bitcoin hardware wallet to store my nostr keys and sign my posts?
Way too many people advocating for hydrogen vehicles seriously have an idea in their mind where they just pour hydrogen into a their current vehicle, and it'll still make the comforting brr-brr sounds they're used to.

They don't actually want a hydrogen vehicle, they just don't want an EV and use "hydrogen is coming Soon(tm)" as justification for it.
I would be quite impressed if there was a way to have Rust with "less stuff". It's not like there is a lot stuff that can be removed without making the language quite useless.
If folks have use cases similar to this that they’d like to explore, please reach out :) We love collaborating with folks who are asking interesting questions about code: https://discord.gg/SQCbGe6zTn
Mine is Derw: https://www.derw-lang.com/

It's a programming language I created after frustration with TypeScript and Elm, in order to write better type-safe code in a functional manner. There's seemless interop between Derw and TS/JS, making it more useful for working with TS codebases than Elm. It's quite production ready though there are a few things left to implement, but so far there's features like:

- A formatter

- A test framework

- A benchmarking framework

- A web framework for writing apps

- VScode extensions

- Type checking

- Output generation for TS, JS, English, Derw and Elm

- A Gitbook: https://docs.derw-lang.com/

I also have a very active blog where I write about Derw or programming in general: https://derw.substack.com/ and the Twitter for staying up to date is https://twitter.com/derwlang
The built-in weights in your brain are modified to discourage you from doing that again?
Interestingly very little of Rust's syntax is novel (the exception being lifetimes which of course don't exist in other languages). The closest language syntacticly is probably TypeScript (you'd be surprised how many programs are actually valid in both Rust and Typescript!). And where syntax doesn't match TypeScript it usually matches something else common. For example the `self` parameter in methods comes from Pythong, and the closure syntax comes from Ruby
I actually think both you and the guy you are arguing with are half correct.

The real answer here, in my opinion, is that yes there would be pandemonium, and then yes, the world would go on without it, but then something else just like it will pop up. And that is because a liquid market for financial assets (whether that is securities, options on securities, futures, etc) will always be a massive benefit to the ability of businesses to conduct business, and the ability of individuals to preserve and increase wealth.
This is absolutely a pain point for us, working on a very large Rust project. In particular, incremental compile times are absolutely critical for developer comfort, and by far the most common complaint working on our codebase is that developer tooling, IDEs and running unit tests is slow. We've done everything that can reasonably be done - splitting the project into crates, using mold as a linker (the single biggest improvement), etc. Without a really big improvement to incremental compile, we will have a continuing drag on our development momentum.
I did the breathing tutorial and did the first exercise but it didn't seem to really "react" to my breathing like I was expecting based on all the promotion. It might get progressively "smarter" but I was expecting more feedback from the UI (which is really pretty btw) when I was breathing in and out.
You mention inheriting little endian from the Datapoint. If that constraint was not there, would a big endian 8086 be materially different in any way? For example could parts be simpler or fewer gates used?
It thrills me to pieces seeing Migros and Galaxus on here. I wish there was something remotely similar to Migros in the US.
this is not solving anything though. people who end up with long-term lonenlines feel (rightly) practically excluded from society and STDs are not high in their concerns
Is there some apple watch data that could be analyzed for more accurate breath reading?
OMG it already exists, thanks for sharing
This is a weird tangent: how do spies introduce nuance into whether public servants are subject to the public’s interest?
There are in larger cities! For example in NYC: https://www.nyc-spc.com/lab-rentals
We'll get to that maturity level! Which database was that out of curiosity?
Got it thanks for clarifying !
Funny how similar this sounds to wireguard, the trending yet simple open source VPN technology. Basically the messages are IP packets there ;-)
I'll second this. Alpine.js is so nice.
https://github.com/ipyflow/ipyflow

IPyflow is a new Python kernel for JupyterLab that understands how variables and cells depend on each other, making it easier to reason about notebook state. It adds opt-in reactivity, so that pressing ctrl+shift+enter triggers execution of all cells that depend (recursively) on the current cell. Furthermore, with its `code` function, you can see exactly what code is needed to reproduce a given variable.
I started working on it after watching the famous talk "I Don't Like Notebooks" by Joel Grus, and, anecdotally, I like notebooks just a little more when I use this kernel :)
Adding my vote here. Throughout my career I've gone the C#.NET -> RoR -> Clojure -> Elixir/Phoenix route. After spending a year with Elixir, iterating rapidly on a production system, I'd default to it for any MVP or serious project going forward.

LiveView is also very close to becoming default over React for interactive Frontends.
Emotional intelligence is another way of saying that you have the ability to read the room, which clearly many people (and very many of the technical people I interact with) did not have great ability for (which results in a lot of cringe-worthy moments).
Just look at the development of RC cars, it's not environmentalism that brought up EVs, it's technical progress.

80's electric RC cars were slow and the battery ran out in 5 minutes. People who wanted power used ICE RC cars.

Then we got li-ion and LiFePo4 batteries and brushless engines. Now the cars are so fast that regular people need to use limiters when driving. You can get a electric RC car up to 80km/h with off the shelf parts easily.
> unless you count enforcing web standards with Chrome

yes, being that the web is THE current platform for technology

in the same way Win32 was 20 years ago

> Also, calling "relevant industry giant making heaps of money" a failure scenario is quite a stretch.

I didn't call it a failure scenario

IBM's making quite a lot of money still (though trending down and not nearly as much as it used to)
What free hosting supports SQLite?
Just a normal create-user/login form. Or Firebase Auth if Google and other sign in's need to be supported.
> It's a machine learning model owned and operated by a company.

How's that different from a human artist shackled to a company by some secret agreements in which he's not the stronger side?
Petals does look interesting.

I think his descriptions need work though.

You know it got some good traction in this submission? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34215665
Based on the trends in "scripting" language programming over the past 30 years including Perl , Python, PHP & Node, i've noticed it's not the "best" language that wins . There needs to be an intersection of ease of use, a broad component library , adequate toolchain, quick iteration and a vibrant community.

Perl & PHP were two examples of languages that were particularly bad fits for their use cases – poor performance, buggy syntax that led to lots of runtime bugs – both were very successful for a time.

To answer your question: Node meets the above qualities reasonably well. It also is ambiguous enough to allow lots of navel-gazing over academic tangential topics so people can avoid actually getting work done and waste a lot of wall & CPU time doing so.
> Rust is as unsafe as C and it's just making your life harder for no reason, except hype.

I hear what you’re saying, but that hasn’t been my experience with rust. I love C, but I’ve been writing rust for the last couple of years. And rust has stolen my heart.

You’re right that unsafe rust is a bit less ergonomic than just writing C. Sometimes I miss void pointers. I definitely miss how fast C compiles. But most rust isn’t unsafe rust. Even deep in my custom in-memory btree implementation I think more than half of my methods are safe. And safe rust is a fabulous language when you can use it. There’s all these bugs you just can’t write.

Early on with rust I had this magical experience. My program segfaulted in one of my tests because of memory corruption. It was “spooky action at a distance” where the segfault happened well after the buggy code was executed. Bugs like this are awful to track down in C because the bug could be literally anywhere. But when I looked at the trace, there was only one unsafe function which could be causing the problem. (Since I could rule out all my safe code). Sure enough, 10 minutes later I had a fix.

I have a skip list for large strings that I ported from C to rust. I still have no idea why, but the rust code ran about 20% faster out of the box than the original optimized C code. And yet, the code is significantly smaller and easier to work with. I’ve added a few more optimizations since then - it’s about 10x faster than the C code now. The new optimizations are all from tricks I never got around to adding in C because I was afraid I might break something.

And then there’s the things rust does well that aren’t in C at all. Cargo is incredible. Monomorphization is the right tool for a lot of problems, like custom collections. (Higher performance and types? Yes please!) Parametric enums & match statements are so much better to work with than C enums and unions. Then there's rust's std, which is fantastic. I use Option, Result, Vec, BtreeMap, PriorityQueue, the OS-agnostic filesystem API, and so on daily.

So yeah, I hear you about C being lovely. But I think rust is even better. Rust is a bit of an ordeal to learn but I'm really glad I learned it. Its a joy to use.
FBI smokes ransomware Hive – recovers decryption keys
> I'm more referring to it in the sense of "I trust you to competently administer this database and not tamper with its data"

A well-administered non-tamperable database of garbage data is still quite useless.

With an unpermissioned public blockchain you can make up your own police department, insurance, towing company and repair shops. Make some wash entries to make them look legitimate and you’re back to square one of having to confirm everything off-chain to figure out what’s real.

Or drown a real report in a sea of fakes if you’re trying to offload a lemon, since there’s not much you can do about spam.

Not to mention the fundamental problems around private key management.
Not tricky at all. If someone is receiving counsel, then someone is giving counsel. Hiding behind a machine adds a pretty minor extra step to identifying the culprits, but does not create ambiguity over whether they are culpable.

On the other hand, here's a lawyer who thinks it would not count as legal representation, but hasn't seen the arguments made against it yet. Food for thought.

https://youtu.be/r-gvArVKfUM
The crux of it is that it is a false assumption, or more accurately a wrong headed assumption, to suggest that Stable Diffusion sees anything or to equate or compare what Stable Diffusion does do with biological sight. Only an individual, whether that be a person, animal, plant, etc., can see. A program, no matter how complex, no matter how advanced its hardware, will never be an individual, an ego, something that sees. It can only mimic and fool us into believing something there is seeing, but we should know better.