skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Have you tried apple cider vinegar (ACV)? Works wonders.

PPIs don't really treat GERD, imho it's one of those medicines to be used perpetually (good only for shareholders).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTzxfoL82n8 - good explanation why/how ACV works and why PPIs don't, iirc
How to Prioritize Anything:

1) Make two lists. Write everything down in the first list. The second list is empty.

2) Something came up! One item on this list cannot be done. It doesn't matter why: you know which one that is. Which one is it? Write that down in the second list and mark it off the first list.

3) Repeat until the first list is done.

Congratulations, your second list is prioritized (albeit likely in reverse order), without extraneous algebraic diversions.

Bonus points for going Warren Buffett on it: only the top 3 priorities matter, sideline everything else; consider repeating the exercise after those three are complete.
Entirely possible that this is a stupid question, but I hope I'm not the only one who has it.

One thing that's made me twitchy with everything in this class of services that's kept me from considering using them - are they working only with shared free/busy or am I correct in believing that you basically have to give them "keys to the kingdom" for them to work with most of the vendors?

Maybe I just haven't paid attention (OK, definitely true), but I don't recall seeing a lot of discussion about most providers having good permissions granularity that would let me say "grant access to my M365 free/busy data but not appointment contents, email, Sharepoint, Onedrive, etc" or "grant access to my Google Workspace calendars X Y and Z but not to email or storage."

Am I missing something and limited access has always been there, or am I correct in believing that granting the calendar access that these need also includes a ton of other access that people may not recognize?
Sounds like a Mayan diety.
“You guys’ heads are on backwards”, I said.

“How many times have your strings needed to convey some speaker’s voice? How many times have your coded strings needed to convey an object’s possession relationship?”

Apostrophe, 3.

Double quotes, 0.
This is the mildlyinfuriating subreddit. It's intentional
I think most thing sold because of lust. Example: 1) avatar generator by ai 2) my local aunties bought iPhone Pro Max just to facebook and chat .. and of course taking pictures.
Waymo driverless car brings San Francisco traffic to a halt during rush hour
> Also, there are many examples of the U.S. military making such mistakes and NOT trying to cover it up.

Including shooting down an airliner. No coverup.
Competition. You can switch to anyone else easily when it's prepaid with no contract durations getting in the way, so they have to behave well to keep your business. I've been on AT&T prepaid for years at 30/month with only sales tax on top of that.
Right. It also requires overcoming problems of trust and trustworthiness.

Doing the work to restore that trust is the work of justice.
With times such as these, you should probably make sure you weren’t made “redundant” first. Although as another poster said before me, there is a spike in the number of reports.
Is there any danger beyond falling? Is sitting/lying down enough?
Not really the case. I reject maybe 90٪ of copilot suggestions. If they leverage that I'm sure it will improve
Isn't that solvable by doing something similar to iMessage and colouring SMS and Signal messages differently?
The right people in the right room

Most tasks on most task lists are not tasks - they are wishes or outcomes

Prioritising outcomes is easy. Do we get five new corporate customers this month or do we build a web scaling system on AWS.

One is a task, one is an unknown project with no clear definitions or starting process. Which is why many startups have great infrastructure and not enough customers.

So, unless you know which right people to put in a room, the thing in front of you is not a task it's an investigation.

And to me this answers the question a few days back about sam altmann - determination is what gets you from "get five customers" to "call bob smith of company X after Joe Schmoe introduces us and offer him a 12 month for price of 6 deal if they sign this week"

Determination is of course made easier with contacts but politicians will politician
Surely it'd be easier to just make crime illegal? Because we all know that declaring something illegal just makes it go away. Stop interfering with unrelated fields like encryption to stop criminals and just make criminal activity illegal!
Sounds to me that you are minimizing the skills of carpenters rather :) I meant that mostly in gist, but they are really essential, just like surgeons, only that the objects the manipulate happens to be different, and mistakes by surgeons tend to be more "costly" in terms of human life.
Oriana I think
Wikipedia is not and cannot, as per their own policies, be the primary source. 'Wikipedia agrees' is shorthand for 'the sources mentioned by this particular Wikipedia article agree'
Maybe! I’m no expert. But it was a really quick situation - lid popped, I looked in , there was boiling chloroform when there was supposed to be a different reagent (due to a software bug in the machine). Down I went. So probably not time for hypoxia?
Fun bug report to write haha
Absolutely. A server who doesn't explicitly tell the customer about these fees in advance is complicit with it, and I'll assume they get the full benefit of these fees in lieu of tips.
another great article about a horrible crash.

https://admiralcloudberg.medium.com/the-long-way-down-the-cr...
>Do I need to have all keys in my physical possession to register them with a new account?

Yeah I think so. Good points.
>To ignore this systemic bias would be to endorse it, which is in effect the same as endorsing institutionalized bias against the minorities affected.

Which is an attempt to imply that you must take race into account when hiring or you're a racist, without actually saying that, because it would be roundly rejected by most people if made plain.
> > Not all work is being performed by cooperating teams. A lot of high-value work is carried out by individuals.

> This isn’t true at all.

Yes, it is true, because if the opposite were true, all work is being carried out by groups.

I have personal testimony, which is all you need when making a “not all” claim. :-)
Another annoyance of the Chrome Web Store: you cannot publish a new version if another version is still pending publication. Ran into that once which meant an even greater time stuck waiting for the latest version to be published...
I agree it’s annoying, it’s just not as bad as changing you 20% after you leave for an unannounced “Fair Wage and Wellness” fee. The restaurant is straight out stealing.
The corruption was a direct result of Russian influence. I don't think there is nearly as much concern over corruption in Ukraine these days. Especially given how much Ukrainians themselves have shown overwhelming enthusiasm for their new national identity.
On Google Calendar as well as Fastmail Calendar there are options to create a share link for your calendar which only exposes availability but not any details of the events other than date/time/duration. It’s not granular other than that though. I use it to share my personal calendar with my work so I can e.g. schedule a doctor appointment with details and have that appear and affect availability in my work calendar - it just shows up as “Unavailable” with no other details.
yes! this is just the first iteration.
Jortage: Fediverse object storage pool with file-level deduplication
> I'd rate the ability of the US Gov't to successfully keep something like that a secret to be roughly zero, plus or minus zero.

You'd be very wrong. There are hundreds (thousands? tens of thousands?) classified missions going on all the time involving large amount of people. And aside for the exceedingly rare whistleblower, all of them are kept secret for decades or more until they get declassified (sometimes never).

(Not trying to give any credibility to the previous comment, just commenting on how effectively governments keep classified secrets.)
That was the "flaps down" switch, not "shut off engines". The key feature of fixed-wing aircraft is being able to glide unpowered; dropping the flaps however would be equivalent to yanking the yoke all the way forward.
News or articles about this keep coming out recently.
but they all seem to be limited to "we think",
"might" and the great potential it may have.

Since we do not know much about how the brain works
to begin with I guess that is as close as we can get.

I say we dont know much about how the brain works as a
I take medication for depression.

The way that works most often is that you are given a pill
that may work.
You take it for between 2 - 26 weeks, depending on results.
(some may have a fast negative effect) and then you tell your
doc if you feel better. (Sometimes complicated surveys)

if it didn't work, you get to do it over again.
and again and again. until you find something that works,
give up or die.

then sometimes it stops working.

One place I know does a cool, I forget the proper name.
They take a "video" of how your brain is "working"
(at an extremely low resolution).
then they compare what they find to knowledge about what
parts of the brain should be active, not active etc.
From this they hope to establish a delta between
"normal" and you.

Then you get to take pills and you come back (after some times)
they do the whole thing over again, to see if you are now
closer to "normal" or not.

The goal then being to find a chemical that brings you as close to
normal as can be.

It is highly appealing in that it would offer -some- scientific
basis for evaluating the drugs aside from "How do you feel".

If it -actually works- I have no idea.
It was far too expensive for me, and to qualify
you have to not have taken any medication already.
(that would mess up the "virgin" recording).

An interesting research project would be recording tens of thousands
of people who self-reported no depression in the hope that some would
develop clinical depression and comparisons could be made.

If we now mix in gut bacteria into the equation, I can imagine
you somehow "insert" new gut bacteria into a person
and then you wait for some time and tell the doc if it worked or not.
If not you can get a different psychobiotics and enter the loop.
Add in regular medication for depression the number of possible
permutation would become huge.

(I like to include this link to a Standford lecture on the
difference between "being sad" and clinical depression
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOAgplgTxfc)
It predates me (6 years), I don't know the origin either, except for coming from "Duty". At least we're not Pageys. There can be only one.

The real curse of PagerDuty, though, is calling everything "-duty". Parental leave is BabyDuty, the training department is LearningDuty, the LGBTQ ERG is RainbowDuty, you get the idea.

Hat-tip to our veterans ERG for not going with DutyDuty, although I hope it was in the running at least.

(I mean I also kind of love it, but you know, it's a lot.)
well, it's because they're separate groups is the problem. The money people don't pay the programmers to sit around and do nothing. so the programmers keep writing more code. if they could just say nope, it's finished, it's done, and step away, and keep getting the paycheck, they wouldn't have to find reasons to keep programming.
Capping?

Like how if an ER was run the way software is maintained, then, on a slow day, the doctor would order all the nurses to go in to the waiting room and bust everyone's knee caps.
But they lack the abstraction necessary to call them self-aware (by the current definition). That’s actually a test to check the development of a child. A child is not very intelligent yet. But it is able to become it on its own just by observing. ChatGPT isn’t.
It feels a little more reasonable to me than removing your shoes or restricting liquids. Even if the shoe bomber had been successful, he wouldn't have been able to take down an entire plane. But it's trivial for a rogue pilot to kill everyone on board a plane. Since 9/11, cockpit doors have been reinforced so that it's basically impossible for anyone in the cabin to force their way into the cockpit. Ensuring that there are at least two people in the cockpit isn't too much of a burden and basically eliminates that attack vector.
> universal support for escalation

A commanding section of the House, alongside influential pundits like Tucker Carlson, are vocally against even present levels of support.
Incorrect. ChatGPT is markedly more capable than GPT3 because of its improved model (instructgpt and supervised fine tuning). Anyone who has played with both can attest to that.

It's not merely UI changes.
We're using something off the shelf to get up and running quickly

https://www.100ms.live/
ChatGPT knows that it is a ChatGPT because it was programmed to know this. See:

https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=6990#comment-1945915
Yes. The person triggering the alarm will still likely look for a place to extinguish the cigarette, and pretend they've done nothing wrong. The ashtray thing is there because otherwise those idiots will put the burning cigarette in the trash or in the tank with chemicals in which it might just cause a pile-up of debris and clogs.
I don’t mind that they invented a language, but my impression is that it could be a better language. Less dynamic, better error messages.
Here's the documentary: https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p0dkb144/india-the-mod...
Let’s hope for some onerous SPA overhaul of HN somewhere down the line. ;)
What's with so many of these comments being flabbergasted that there's a switch in the cockpit that can cause harm to everyone on the plane?

Do you realize you're entrusting two people in the front of the plane with your life as soon as the plane takes off? There are probably DOZENS of switches that if they are flipped maliciously will result in everyone on the plane dying.
At some point I'll be more interested in what kind of computing device you cannot make Doom run on.
Neither Mössenböck nor Wirth were involved with the posted paper, and neither intended to create a "high-performance alternative to C++". The authors of the paper who made this claim are different people, who apparently didn't know C++ good enough.
Very interesting! And the bear-themed solution is cute! I would love to use such a tool to summarize and to ELI5 things like employment contracts or fine prints on a bank statement on the web. This tool might save folks a lot of time and energy.
> If they resembled something else strongly enough to say there was just the one, we would not be discussing this.

That doesn't make sense to me. Maybe they did and you don't know about it.
I know a lot of people are vividly impressed by this but to me "writing in the style of" (Victorian sonnets, poems, hip hop lyrics) is the equivalent of transfer learning and feels more like a cheap parlor trick.

While I wont deny that it has impressive summarization abilities in terms of making excellent Q&A if you're willing to vet the information, I wouldn't exactly say that chatGPT is capable of meaningful conversation. It has great powers of recollection but its capacitive powers to produce new interesting information feels highly formulaic.
Calendly doesn't ask for Google drive or email access, and limits itself to calendar reading and writing, if that's what you're asking. Other, shittier apps may ask for more, but don't draw conclusions where they aren't warranted.
Fiction: Software developers develop whatever they want

Fact: Project owners decide features and project managers assign them to developers.
Justin Bieber sells rights to his music for $200M
triple Streisand alert--woop woop woop!
All air carrier flights are flown from shortly after takeoff to some point in the approach phase on a clearance that is entered in the flight management computer during pre-flight. Until the initial unplanned left turn the flight was likely flying in this manner. The turn itself could not have been executed on autopilot though. It was far too steep. The autopilot flight envelope protections would have limited the bank angle at that altitude. As it is, the plane was likely riding a fine line on the edge of a high altitude stall/spin scenario in order to execute that tight maneuver.
Great news! Let's shut down this scam Zuck's been involved with! We've seen Second Life and it was cool while it lasted!
It's a pretty easy trap to fall into though. At least Communism has a high-minded ideal, in contrast to Capitalism's vague (but true IMO) "We'll make everyone rich"

Just look at any internet thread about Communism today, haha. It's a very compelling fantasy
What about the data would require an expert to reconstruct? They have the simulated flight path. It's very similar to the final flight path of the real plane.
For 1), I suspect once you figure out you can just start asking your co-workers to do your stuff, you reach first level of enlightenment and transition from $jobtitle into senior $jobtitle.

For 2), the point is to throw the task - and responsibility for completing it - over the wall. That's why it's prescribed for Urgent and Not Important work: urgency is satisfied by you delegating quickly, and if your victim screws up and fails the task, well, no big deal - the task wasn't important anyway.

All that to say: yeah, I can't see a way this isn't abusive and antisocial, unless done in business context with clear rules, such as hiring people specifically for you to delegate work to them.
There are plenty of reasons why people shouldn't be flying planes. Being unable to not smoke is not really any different from being unable to resist getting drunk or falling asleep, as far as safety people have to be concerned. It fundamentally doesn't matter if it's "your fault" or "addiction" or a "medical reason"...
Sequoia and YC showing losses for major LP, USV gains
I've been using it for quite a while to book podcast interviews - I like that it integrates scheduling a google meets room automatically. I do wish it supported more vid conf software options though.
> The cashier said, "Don't worry about it, the tips just go to management."

This happens, but it IS illegal in most jurisdictions.
> I was eyeball-deep in analytic philosophy

Then you should be aware (and the rest of your comment implies you are) that

> does it 'know' [...] that it is writing the screenplay?

hangs on a there being a reasonable interpretation of "know" in the case of LLMs.

"Know" is often used as a kind of shorthand in the case of inanimate objects: "the website knew I was using Internet Explorer so it sent me the javascript workarounds", "the thermostat knew the temperature had reached the target so it switched the boiler off" - perhaps shorthand for 'P was causally dominant in machine behaving like so' becoming 'machine behaved like so because it knew that P'.

I think "ChatGPT knows who directed Lost Highway because it answered 'David Lynch' when I asked it", "ChatGPT knows that Hitler is a touchy subject so it refused to write a review of Mein Kampf" and so on are similar in their ascription of 'knowledge' to ChatGPT.

In the same way that the thermostat is engineered to turn off the boiler when the target temperature is reached, ChatGPT is engineered to make linguistic productions that accord with its design goals, including being factually correct on matters of general knowledge and avoiding toxicity, the corpus and training providing the means of achieving these goals.

Taking the above on board, ChatGPT's "knowledge" of indexicals doesn't seem any different from its "knowledge" of David Lynch or Hitler. The statistical relations instilled by its training make it likely to use indexicals in a way that conforms to the conventional human use of them: it 'knows' how to use indexicals.

There's also a different reading of your question: "is ChatGPT programmed specifically to take account of self-knowledge - is this special-cased in code or training?" (which I guess it may be, since it seems informed about itself despite its training corpus dating only up to 2021). But while this may be an interesting programmer question it seems philosophically inert; either way, we're still talking about engineered thermostat knowledge.

Maybe a more interesting question: what distinguishes the knowledge in "I (as a non-LLM human - trust me!) know that David Lynch directed Lost Highway" from the 'inanimate knowledge' exhibited by thermostats, websites, and ChatGPT?
Alternatively, if you dont like the kube's learn yourself some erlang, and make a super fault tolerant application.
Adding single sign-on to your Django web application using OIDC
Correction Officer lobby groups consistently fight any legalization (marijuana or otherwise), any loosening of alcohol restrictions in states where there are, and are steadily advocating for higher and stricter sentencing.
Going off of your comment, I just signed up with /ElijahLynn (CamelCase) and it looks like I have both https://cal.com/ElijahLynn and https://cal.com/elijahlynn available, redirecting to my profile. The UI displays https://cal.com/elijahlynn, fwiw.
I'm not an expert but I would start with inhale.
I have a decent sized book collection, and what I'd like the most is a ctrl-f for books. Does that exist already in e-readers?

Personally I think question answering is still very gimmicky, in particular because I can't clearly understand why the answer is what it is. Ctrl-f is completely explainable, I know why it works and why it fails, and is a much more useful tool to engage with books. The main problem seems that the full text of most books is not available unencumbered to process as one sees fit
It is also an Open Startup > https://cal.com/open
Do the upstream Signal servers allow third party clients now, or does this need separate infrastructure for the signal part (to be compliant and/or avoid an account ban)?
Pascal is a great alternative to C.
It is practical for writing operating systems.
Though its use for this has declined if not vanished.

Most think of it as a "basic tinkering and learning" language,
and indeed, that is probably the most common application.
It does not have to be. [1]

UNIX came with C, and C became "IT".

[1] https://wiki.freepascal.org/Operating_Systems_written_in_FPC....
If your fork takes off, I (and others) would love to help contribute. Things like ChromeOS/Android table support (which many forks have added in the past) and being able to use an Android phone/tablet as a link device would be great.
This is a really weird characterization of a normal airplane function.

First, you are seeming to act as if the power between passengers and pilots should be equal. Why would this ever be? The pilot has all the power and the passengers none. Thinking of past hijackings, it's obvious that it must be this way.

Second, the plane needs to be able to handle all sorts of 1 in a million events. Recall there were around 22 million flights in 2021, and of those, exactly 1 was involving a Boeing or Airbus jet (maybe that's even true for Embraer or Bombardier and that tier of airliner). This is because the pilot has a vast amount of controls that are required to handle various events. A plane is a pressurized tube flying thru the sky, of course controls for pressure in the cabin must exist to allow equalization under aberrant circumstances.

Finally, activating this "kill" switch would drop oxygen masks to every passenger in the plane automatically; the pilot does not have any say in this matter. While these masks obviously have limited duration, there isn't exactly a way the pilot could perform this mass murder without their own death or imprisonment being guaranteed too. Frankly, I find your representation of the purpose of the switch so immature as to be offensive.
It's the "brexit of technology" - the UK doing something stupid that shoots itself in the foot.

I think we should just leave them to it......