skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Again, the question isn't whether people like having an abusive partner. The question is, is being an abusive (or just bad) partner positively or inversely correlated with sexual opportunity? Your linked post doesn't engage with that question at all. It does explore why people perpetrate abuse, which is an interesting discussion in its own right, but not relevant to this OP.
It seems a bit selfish but there is some additional rational for this...

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."
-Richard Feynman, Personal observations on the reliability of the Shuttle

Just know if you are designing software to protect a life be willing to test it on yourself first. After all, "I am the Only User"
I’ve been working on a side project that aims to provide a really simple UX to spin up full-stack web apps with CI and scalable infra by default. The idea is that you would simply enter a domain name you want to purchase and then the tool would do the following:

1. Purchase the domain name using AWS Route53 (perhaps you’d need to setup an IAM role for the website to access your pre existing AWS acct)

2. Setup frontend, API, and CDK infra repos. All in TypeScript.

3. Frontend react, backend Api gateway backed by lambda functions. Have a graphql endpoint that talks to an Amazon auroradb. CI for backend and frontend is defined by a CDK package that is also deployed to the AWS account that also sets up the networking and database for you.

4. Have a basic layer of application code for setting up user authentication and storing user data in the aurora db.

Basically my idea is it kinda sucks that everyone has to do all of this setup yourself if you want to start a new project. Or you have to rely on no-code tools like Squarespace etc which may not be what most engineers are looking for. Having something that can go from simply entering the domain name you want to scaffolding out a fully functional full stack web app with CI and serverless infra defined by code that can scale from day 1 seems both incredibly useful and doable.

Curious to hear other people’s thoughts on this!
> fast-growing cloud-computing market.

Hasn't that already been won by like 3 companies?
I wasn’t saying anything about sympathy. If you think US courts are fair, I’d suggest you do your own research.
MapLibre board member here. Really cool map! I also just love seeing MapLibre random places on the internet. :)
Trying to "flirt" in those spheres is looked down upon just as ferociously as doing it at the office. Have you not seen the viral TikTok of the woman that was "angry" that some guy was "checking her out" at the gym, while the man was barely paying attention at her at all?
> This is the correct answer. It's quite shocking how many Django and Laravel answers there are in this thread. Performance and type safety appear to be completely irrelevant to HN.

I was wondering about that actually.

Writing code in Python, Rails, etc is painful. A stupidly high percentage of the "unit tests" aren't testing logic at all, they're simply ensuring that incorrect types are handled properly.

And then I see comments like "well, my MVP can run very cheaply, a $100/m DO droplet" and wonder what on earth they are talking about - I had a $5/m DO droplet handling around 50k-60k concurrent TCP (not HTTP) connections, all serving data without any of the connecting devices timing out.

The devspeed differential between things like C#/Java/Go and Python/PHP/Ruby is large only at the very beginning of your project. When you're adding new features in every day, six months into the project, you're almost definitely going to be faster in some statically typed compiled language.

Seriously, using Django is likely to shave a week or so off the time; if that week matters so much then your expected lifetime for the product is what? Two weeks? Three?

I get it, in that if your MVP is timeboxed to (say) two weeks to alpha, then, yeah, those things that shave a week off make sense. But if your MVP is timeboxed to two weeks:

a) Tt's unlikely to be of much value to the consumer,
b) Your competitors will appear two weeks after you first launch anyway.

I want to do a new product, and when judging each product idea I have, the largest issue is always finding the largest amount of value I can create/deliver in a particular timeframe (say, 3 months f/time).

If the value the product is providing can be done in a week with Rails, then there's not much motivation for me to develop that product - everyone with a week of leave or a month of weekends is going to have a clone out before I can even learn marketing.

If it's going to take 3 months regardless of the language, I have at least 3 months to build up a userbase, and do product refinement and fit.
People who complain about Google remind me of the meme “no one goes there anymore - it’s too full.”

Google has a lot of legitimate headwinds, but honestly I don’t think antitrust or AI competitors are them.

The legitimate “destruction” of legitimacy on the internet, thus making Search more error prone is an issue. Closed off ecosystems such as apple is an issue.

The antitrust case is a big deal, but it’s unlikely Google would be broken up due to it.
There's no existing legal doctrine around "generators" and "aggregators" but there is around "commercially significant non-infringing use". Something like what you're saying would need to be established by the higher courts.
Audio recording of a US Civil War veteran
An exceptional audio recording of Civil War experience by Captain Julius Howell of 24th "Vur-jinya" calvary.

Recorded in 1948 at the age of 101. He died shortly afterward at age of 102 in June 19, 1948.

And in the audio recording, he takes it all the way home at the 10m30s timemark.
"while making no effort to hide one's sexual interest"

This is tricky, but key. If you hide your interest, you will most likely act weird.

And yes, rejection is part of the game and no problem. Unless of course - like you say - one is already broken. Then a simple rejection can be devastating of the remaining confidence.

Flirting is a game, but some never learned how to play. I also learned it quite late and remember the awkward teenage years and feel sorry for those who never got the chance. And nowdays it even seems harder.
That's it, though those knobs do look a bit different from what I remember.
Then they'd need sponsored content disclosures.
Will Ukraine Wind Up Making Territorial Concessions to Russia?
Never heard of phoenix but sounds interesting. What's the persistence layer of the stack?
So church is a place you can go to hook up and have sex? They seem to be underselling that feature.
He's pulling a Schmidhuber.
At the moment Rails is focused on simplicity/readability. I've got a gem that I'm proposing (and DHH is evaluating) that adds caching as an option: https://github.com/rubys/dockerfile-rails#overview
You aren't wrong but what's different today is these are often substitutes for the sort of organic socializing that was largely wiped out by modern street and neighborhood planning.

Crafted socializing tends to take more energy and resources, two things that are scarce for many in our modern economy.
What would you change to the UX and design to make it even better?
> developer community broadly seems to be migrating more towards Node?

How did you came to this conclusion? I work with PHP teams daily and they don't think about moving, but even if they did I wouldn't expect them to seriously consider node. Overall I would say that in the last few years there was increase in number of competent PHP developers.
Does Bitcoin support dispute resolution (i.e. chargebacks) yet?
Even the places where church is still a significant part of the social fabric have trended towards the mega-church format. It’s the difference between trying to get to know someone in your 30 person section course versus the 800 person lecture hall.
I had hobbies, now I have kids. But when I did have hobbies where did I meet people to hobby with? Work!
the dev workflow usage of docker is less about developing your own app locally and more about being able to mindlessly spin up dependencies - a seeded/sample copy of your prod database for testing, a Consul instance, the latest version of another team's app, etc.

You can just bind the dependencies that are running in Docker to local ports and run your app locally against them without having to docker build the app you're actually working on.
YouTube being a billion user product has nothing to do with how successful they are. My free service of "Contact me and I will give you a dollar" can grow to billions of users if you borrow enough money, and don't care at all about actually making it back.
Worked well for me in Firefox with a boatload of extensions. I wonder if they are using some extension that the site doesn't like?
Show me the AI chat system from a decade ago that could hallucinate a git repo.

Edit: let me be more careful:

Show me the AI chat system from a decade ago that wasn't specifically designed to hallucinate git repos, but would hallucinate a git repo in response a detailed natural language prompt. It should have been good enough in its output to cause the user to write more prompts in an attempt to gauge whether the AI system is querying the internet in realtime to generate its response.
You can't post like this here, regardless of how wrong others are or you feel they are. If you do it again, we'll have to ban you again, so please don't do it again. Please stop with flamebait/battle comments like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34523506 too.

If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.
Because status lets you procreate and have offspring. See any mammalian group organization.
Short term large purchases are covered nicely.

And OP definitely said "paycheck to paycheck" which seems quite normal, and didn't mention anything too strange.

But yeah, there's no one-size-fits all, but as a philosophy, this flowchart is spot on: Cover your butt, then maximize money growth by optimizing paydown / investment by interest rates, and cover your butt more over time.
> "adapt" our way out of being 20m under water

the human race could certainly adapt to 20m sea rise with zero impact on the long term survivavility of the species. we already adapted to much greater sea rise only 10,000 years ago.

will societies and institutions built on the supposed "value" of waterfront properties survive? probably not. but that is a social and institutional problem, not a biological one.
Agreed, the author is not the smartest either. However, the concepts aren't high philosophy either, and he covers the important things well.

- buy assets that generate profit, not liabilities

- keep a budget

- business is the way to money, not a salary

- he covers various aspects of business on a high level, and emphasizes the importance of sales
It's OK if marketing spend goes down as long as digital continues to steal from non-digital advertising. Example: Advertising money spent on barely-targeted billboards and TV commercials could move to digital substitutes. This is some of what Google is trying to do with YouTube purchasing the rights for some NFL games.
It seems not that hard to just manually bump your version periodically, right? I get that it's not as nice as having it taken care of for you, but it's not like you're having to manage a whole system by hand
He will change his tune if ChatGPT uses CNN
I think that push has helped but it's not universal and there's a lot of stigma around mental health issues.
well he is right that the techniques used have been around. but this is the first mainstream AI that most people outside of the AI community have been impressed with and found useful to do real world stuff
> As word got out, an uneasy buzz began to swirl among various state bar officials, according to Browder. He says angry letters began to pour in.

So an organization with the sole purpose of gatekeeping and anti-competitive market control does the anti-competitive market control. Why is this bar idea itself still legal?
> This seems to contradict some view on women's POV here. As in, for women the sexual transaction is big serious deal.

And other women learn how to decrease the cost.

Women that are fine with hormonal birth control with partners that test for STDs frequently are fine. There is a lot of consequence free sex happening.

It doesn't matter that it contradicts a view, your mistake is elevating them as representatives of the entire sex. They aren't, even if they masquerade as so, they are just individuals.
They risk laying of RedundantHuman93, who years ago was super human according to the metrics then, and retains the most in-depth institutional knowledge from being core to the business, but on paper for this layoff and it's (holy financial crusade) metrics looks like a lesser performer because their projects are just 'part of the institution' or they are bogged down in tons of unsexy deadwood 'keep the business running tasks' at this point and uninteresting 'overhead' that 'anyone can do'. But once they let RedundantWetware93 go the company realizes the mistake and have to hire them back as a consultant at greater expense, now with zero buyin from ParasiticMeatsackConsultant93, and as they interact with many core people/departments their lack of buyin and the reason for it impacts large core groups of biologicalLoborUnits. The company is also less flexible as they now have to schedule around Deadwood93s availability. Without the 'underperformer' the company is at risk of falling out of applicable legal/industry regulation/various compliance requirements because that stuff's all invisible and 'of course someone takes care of that stuff' without thinking who catches all the little intimate details that require a proactive thinking human being. They stop paying attention to specific customer commitments/requirements/requests that are just going to be dropped now, with potential contractual lawsuits and definite loss of customer good will.

All humans are not just FutureRedundantWetwareMeatsacks that the all knowing bean counters can move around on a board. In reality business is about relationship/small detail institutional knowledge silo'd in individuals/humans proactively getting done what needs doing, many details that get poorly caught by tribal documentation systems.

If your people are truly cogs you don't have a business, you have a franchise, and anyone else can do the cookie cutter things your business is doing, and most likely better/cheaper/flashier. But for some reason HK and all these companies doing layoffs either don't understand that, or they WANT to turn their company into a generic franchise where everyone is interchangeable and lose the flexibility/capability/competency that being a business of interconnected humans gives.
After working on a Phoenix project and using LiveView and Tailwind it just makes my brain hurt to think of using anything else. I expect Phoenix is over-represented here because Hacker News tends to attract the smart set.
>Sounds like you've never experienced a catastrophic failure due to an automation that didn't work right.

Much much much more due to human error......but hey maybe you are the worst programmer ever..but even then i would say your programs are more reliable then a human.
It is general advice. Even if you're taking it slowly, you need to somehow let the person you are interested in know that they will enjoy hooking up with you someday, or they won't stick around to wait for you.

Edit: I still need to emphasize the public element. Don’t let your co-workers and friends know you’re into them (at least don’t blame me if you do)
ChatGPT can provide correct citations because somewhere deep in its weights it does lossily encode real texts and citations to real texts. That makes real citations in some cases be its most confident guess for what is supposed to come next in the sentence. But when there isn't a real text it is confident about giving a citation about, but it still feels like a citation should be next in the output, it will happily invent realistic looking citations to texts that have never existed and it has never seen in any sources. On the outside, as readers, it's hard to tell when this occurs without getting an outside confirmation. I'm assuming though that to some degree it is itself aware that a linked citation doesn't refer to anything
Great to hear! Let me know if you run into issues.
Is there artwork included in libjpeg?
"just be white", bro
I think if you read the headline it seems childish. His main point is that Google/Meta couldn't really release this, since the accuracy is really really poor.
Stanford student may need to ‘acknowledge harm’ for reading ‘Mein Kampf’
Please don't start this up again.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
it will probably divert humans from writing mostly junk and occasional quality content to far fewer humans writing quality content while every other writer is out of a job.
What I Learned in One Year as an SRE Trainee
> how do you prevent someone from repeatedly returning items just to hurt a competitor and/or making frivolous defect/warranty claims against them?

Seems like a subset of the fake-review problem. Except with money exchanged, tangible costs to the retailer and more documentation.
> The symptoms of Long Covid are so vague

They’re often worse than that. A lady was interviewed on Radio 1 a few days ago and she had recorded over 100 (!) symptoms in herself that she attributed to long COVID.

The fun part of the story was she was never diagnosed with COVID at any point since 2020. She assumed when she got sick in March of 2020 it was COVID and that’s when her problems began.

Everything about her story pointed strongly to serious mental health issues, but she completely rejected even the idea that was possible.
Right, like another commenter suggests, perhaps I do have long covid and I just don't know it. I'm sure there's a confabulation.
Those offerings are only for options holders. RSUs cannot be traded; otherwise, every RSU holder has to pay taxes.
https://grizzlybulls.com

It's a freemium subscription service to the algorithmic trading models / hedging systems I've been developing over the last few years. 2022 performance:

SPX (benchmark): -18.77%

Free models:

TA - Mean Reversion Basic (https://grizzlybulls.com/models/ta-mr-basic): -9.93%

TA - Trend Basic (https://grizzlybulls.com/models/ta-trend-basic): -17.79%

Vix Basic (https://grizzlybulls.com/models/vix-basic): -20.45%

Premium models:

Vix Advanced (https://grizzlybulls.com/models/vix-advanced): -17.9%

Vix - TA Advanced (https://grizzlybulls.com/models/vix-ta-advanced): -16.14%

Vix - TA Macro Advanced (https://grizzlybulls.com/models/vix-ta-macro-advanced): -3.15%

Vix - TA Macro Monetary Policy Extreme (https://grizzlybulls.com/models/vix-ta-macro-mp-extreme): +0.56%

The models use no leverage and are always either 100% long the S&P 500 or 0% long (in cash). These are not HFT, averaging one trade per 2-4 weeks on average depending on the model. You can see active signals for the free models by checking the site frequently, or if you subscribe to one of the premium plans you'll get email or text notifications as well.

In 2022, all but one of the models beat the SPX on an absolute performance basis, some substantially so with the top model returning positive absolute returns with a +19.33% outperformance gap. However, it was still a much worse year than 2021 as the unprecedented reversal of Fed policy in response to 40 year high inflation proved to make a challenging backdrop.

Full 2022 performance report: https://grizzlybulls.com/blog/models-performance-update-q4-2...

My take on the EMH, in short I believe in the 95% EMH, but that 5% makes all the difference and perfectly explains how legendary traders like RenTech, TwoSigma and David E Shaw have been able to outperform the market consistently for decades: https://grizzlybulls.com/blog/time-in-the-market-vs-timing-t...
As you know, you can't break the rules like this here, regardless of how wrong or annoying someone else is or you feel they are.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

You have a long history of posting abusively to HN. I don't want to ban you from the "trash heap of this site", but you seem to be completely ignoring all the warnings (I posted https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33914274 just a few weeks ago) and leaving little alternative. Would you please fix this?
https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/support/DisasterRecoveryFAQs...

> Question: Can I connect to both the production and the DR site at the same time?

Answer: No, only one site is available at a time. When the primary site is up, the DR site is down;
and when the DR site is activated, the primary site is down.

I think they need to update these docs to say /should/ be down
Thank you, I'm getting help, it just takes time to heal.
Ya, we are missing amortization benefits by not having a second kid :(
There are secondary markets for private companies' shares (like EquityZen) but I believe you need to be an accredited investor to participate
> Especially given the strong economic numbers that just came out, yeah I don't buy the "bad macro climate" argument anymore.

The US Federal Reserve literally says they are committed to bringing the US to a recession to curb inflation (if it is what it takes to do so). So while strong economic numbers are a "good thing", it just means the current numbers will keep getting worse until it's a recession. (Or the Fed will change course. Who knows.)
awesome. Looking forward to trying this on Android!
It's quite fascinating how information retrieval and search engines have evolved..

From trying to teach people how to google via "I am feeling lucky", to using language models for ranking, to building LLMs to better adapt to user queries and move beyond keywords, to having arguably useful chatbots that can synthesize responses.

I am curious to see what the future holds. Maybe an AI that can anticipate our queries?
Fresh now solutions is what put us in this situation: distutis2 was fresh, setuptools was fresh, pip was fresh, wheels were fresh... So now you have a lot of complexity that come from having a lot of solutions in parallel that are slow to sunset.

But the dirty secret of python packaging is that most of the problem don't come from packaging, but from boostrapping python. And this is a huge can of worms I didn't even mentioned.

Also, plenty of things require the participations of other communities like debian splitting pip out of the main package or anaconda not being compatible with pip.

All in all, the way you hand wave the problem is typical from the critics that have a very narrow view of the situation.

If it was that easy, it would have been done.
It seems to log me out every day unlike pretty much every other web service besides banks.
> Most people don't feel great after each rejection and so are not willing to put in the work.

Don't talk lightly about such things. Rejections are a known cause for suicides.

> The only exception is if the person has some kind of trauma or psychological wall and exposure harms them - in that case, I recommend talking to a professional first.

It's likely everybody had a rejection at least once. It's also likely a large percent didn't particularly enjoy the outcome. I don't think that so many people should seek professional help though - or it should be something very different from what we assume now.
Typically Postgres
The Postgres REPL (2021)
It works out horribly. In China men at the lower end of the economic scale have effectively no chance of finding anyone and many do not even try because the cost is too high. That causes social unrest.