skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I allocate 30% of the working time to support, 60% to development time, and 10% slack as in reserved for unexpected contingencies.
I am describing an actual event with that sentence. Are you suggesting that someone can’t rant about such things?
Sorry for the uncanning! My thought was simply to connect the OP with a YC partner in case they wanted to explore doing this as a startup.

I send such emails all the time but on semi-rare occasions have to resort to offtopic pleas like the GP.

I hope that helps clear things up!
I can imagine it being intentional too: You can tell whether the documentation was illegally used to create a competitor.
It used to mean something that actually gave you immunity to something. Like Polio.
Anti-Cheating and Artificial Intelligence – Tata Steel Chess
It could be interesting to explore the possibility of using AI to detect when a player it's playing differently from his signature style, in a similar way AI is used for fraud/bot detection and such.
I think if we take "description of a number" to mean "ZF formula that uniquely picks out that number", then that cannot be defined, because a formula picks out a number when it is true for that number and false for all others, but by Tarski[0], the truth predicate cannot be defined inside the logic itself. So "the set of all numbers which cannot be described" cannot be talked about using ZF.

However, there is a way around it, by taking as axiom that ZF is consistent, choosing some model M of ZF, and then talking about the set S of numbers inside M that cannot be described.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarski%27s_undefinability_theo...
Pushing to the local repository can be used to rename tags (here from "foo" to "bar"):

git push . refs/tags/foo:refs/tags/bar :refs/tags/foo
For smaller quantities (sub $1000) USA's Zelle allows for free instant transfers 24/7 with email/phone number. It does have daily limits but if a business was dealing with $15k MRR or $30k MRR then surely they would just buy a POS. So if you wanted to act as a merchant selling $200 of groceries out of your garage in your neighborhood in the US then you could feasibly do it using Zelle. Basically all banks support it. You might say that requiring a bank account is a barrier but they're literally free at many banks. You can even create a bank account completely online with companies like Charles Schwab.
So saving less than booting Joe Rohan ?
Yes and no.

Yea, for outbound packets.

Nope, for inbound packets.

BSD and Windows provides both; Linux, not so much.
I think I understand the question. The disagreement seems to be what "undocumented worker" here means.

If you think it means the worker is on the books, but is not a citizen, then you get to your question. It should be roughly the same.

If you think it means that the worker was off the books, regardless of citizenship, then you arrive at the other.

My consideration is if I am a cleaner and get my child to help out on a few jobs, my child will not be a documented worker and it will be a transparent boost to my productivity. Indeed, many subcontractors and migrant workers will use family as a cheap way to boost productivity so that they can take more jobs.

I grant that construction may land on the other interpretation. There are usually more rules for that kind of work. (Though, in rural areas? Not sure.)
I'm sure you took responsibility for your bad stock markets returns in 2022 by saying you'll never make investment decision ever again and hand everything to your partner, right?
You think that the concept of unauthorized workers coming across the border has only existed since the year 2000?

I think you're confusing the term "undocumented" or "undocumented worker" with the underlying concept that's referenced by the terms. The concept has long been in in the public spotlight using different terms ("illegal" or "illegal alien").

Here's some statements from Gerald Ford on the same concept, using the old lingo: https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/library/document/0110/1181...
My concern is ‘modern rich economies’ are a temporary aberration due to financialization and that the intelligence vs work schism will fall apart due to the under-appreciation of the importance of maintaining a manufacturing base. I would agree with you if the windfall of having been intelligent was invested in becoming more intelligent and thus an advantage is maintained but by my observation that has not occurred. It seems people will instead use their relative luxury to hold increasingly illogical ideas. Not only will we not have a manufacturing base but we won’t be intelligent either. For now financialization is propping up our way of life but that won’t last forever.
> No.

Yes.

The topic was leveling out district funding, not paying teachers more. Leveling out district funding might help a little, but it's not the main cause of bad schools/districts. Paying teachers more might help, but would also not do much for the worst districts. Those bad schools and districts are, to a large degree, merely symptoms of larger societal problems that schools aren't equipped, empowered, or intended to address.

The problems are in how our economy is structured, how our social safety net is scoped, funded, and arranged, how fallout from various racist older systems have affected the current state of the country, the justice system, and probably in certain socialized behaviors or attitudes (which are all tied up in those other things, anyway). You cannot turn a terrible district in a very bad part of the city, or awful, poor rural school districts, into good districts just by giving them more money, no matter what they spend the money on (unless you put the schools in charge of sweeping social reform programs, I guess, but I don't think anyone's proposing that and it's probably not the best way to administer such things).

The kids and the parents have problems the schools can't fix, and those affect school life in ways that put a ceiling on how well the schools can do, no matter how good the schools per se are. The main reason some districts or schools are better than others has more to do with selection bias than funding—schools with easy-to-teach kids do well, schools with hard-to-teach kids don't, and the reasons some kids are in one of those categories and others are in the other mostly aren't within the scope of what schools can fix, period.

Rich districts aren't good mainly because they have more money on account of high house prices, but because high house prices and (sometimes) other circumstances (car dependency, commute range) select for kids with stable, comfortable home lives, parents who value education and are themselves educated, and little criminality or blatantly anti-social behavior in (at least) their immediate family & friend circle—because absence of those qualities in home-life tend to correlate with poverty, so, with not being able to afford to move to districts with expensive housing. The house prices are an important part of the reason, but not (mainly) because they enable higher tax revenues.
I am trying to allude to transfinite numbers and annoy mathematicians without losing a general audience, feel free to ignore such things.
The attraction to hydrogen by the automotive companies of Japan is that it would preserve their balance sheets. An ICE car produces various revenue streams for auto makers. First, the sale price, then the oil changes, and plenty of ongoing maintenance. While a straight up EV would shrink an automaker's balance sheet tremendously. The motor has one moving part that is very resilient. The motor doesn't require a transmission. Regenerative brakes means a long time between needing new brakes. And then of course, other industries that support ICE transportation. Oil refineries, gas stations and all of that.

Conveniently, a hydrogen fuel cell in a car replicates almost of that. The fuel cell is a hot, complex finicky source of power that needs maintenance and sophisticated manufacturing to create. Storing the hydrogen itself is very tricky as it tends to eat metals. It still needs normal brakes.

You can see why the CEO's of Japanese car makers could allow themselves to be deluded about how much better fuel cell technology is than EV tech. EV tech is just a battery, an electric motor and regenerating braking. This is technology from a hundred years ago and needs very little regular maintenance other than tires, a wall socket and wiper fluid.
You forgot to mention the pixel return springs but you seem like a nice guy so I'll let it slide.
My point is just that limited measurement precision does not imply anything about the underlying structure, could be continuous or not, I am not arguing for one side or the other.
If I fall off a ladder and break my leg, I want the good stuff. I’ve found old bottles of expired Vicodin and such around that I was prescribed but never finished. I have zero interest in recreationally using opiates. I also have zero interest in bravely tolerating agonizing pain if I don’t have to.
no Agenda....one of the best and no ads!!!!
Thanks for sharing Typer, I was completely oblivious!

> Typer uses Click internally. That's the only dependency.

Pretty clever way to walk on giants shoulders!
Consistency isn't possible because we don't come close to seeing everything that gets posted here.

I've read that comment and flagged it and posted https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34493349 now. Still, it was nowhere near as much of a guidelines violation as what you did. Your reply didn't even relate to what the GP had said—it was pure offtopic ideological boilerplate, plus name-calling. That kind of thing will get you banned here regardless of what you're arguing for or how wrong other people are or you feel they are.

People routinely accuse us of being secretly aligned with their enemies. It always feels like the mods are against you. This is a reflex response that has zero to do with how we actually moderate HN. Do you have any idea how many people accuse us of being secretly aligned with your views? They do that from exactly the same cognitive bias. Every side feels that way, and they all get super mad about it. The one thing you all ironically agree about is who to blame!

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
How is the labor cost accounting done in businesses that rely on such labor? How does the risk of government sanctions to the business play out?

I'm interested where the blind-eyes are built in.
Sure, next time you introduce a bug in your code, you'll immediately resign, right?
I should have been more clear. I wouldn't use a sharkbite for a permanent fix, but being able to patch something until you can either do a permanent fix or get a plumber out is a big win. I even keep PVC glue and some collars/caps for the same reason.
Oh yeah, stuff like that is very common in graphics!

I remember a college exercise where I had to prove this by calculating the resulting transformation matrix which would apply these three shears in order and comparing it to the rotation matrix as provided.

Similarly, translation in 2D is the same as shearing in 3D - and translating in 3D is the same as shearing in 4D. That's why a lot of game engines use a 4D matrix for, well, everything: it's a very convenient way to scale, orient, and position an object.

Takes a while to get used to - especially if you have never used matrices before - but they are actually really easy in practice.
I guess the issue is why is "cheating" relevant if there's no competition? Or are most of the Bay area swimmers also doing races?
Hey, thank you so much for trying the app. I will improve the free trial feature, especially you are right for the 5 minutes limit. I go with the most basic solution first, but I will let to pick longer files on next release. Thanks!
We usually think of vaccines as medicines that train the immune system to attack unwelcome molecules / microbes.

Perhaps the parent was asking if this technique actually uses the immune system?

(From skimming the article, I think the answer is yes.)
"Illegal immigrant" is a dysphemism for "cheap labor".
As a nix user I agree. Nix needs to make flakes stable ASAP. It creates a lot of confusion for new users and friction for getting started. "Do I use the thing that's deprecated but stable or the thing that's unstable but is the future of nix?"
At least they didn't call Singhal back.

>“People could ask real questions, not just type in keywords,” [Andrew] Ng said. Singhal wasn’t interested. “People don’t want to ask questions. They want to type in keywords,” he said. “If I tell them to ask questions, they’ll just be confused.” [1]

Unless on the first try the user gets everything they want and more. But no, google wanted "keywords keywords keywords!". Can't blame them, who wouldn't want to play god sit back and watch people make SEO offerings to you or start a bidding war to be nearest your text box.

[1] Genius Makers - Cade Metz
It's so good!

How did you market this app? How did you get the traction?
While I agree with Stroustrup that there's a rush to get memory safety bolted onto C++, it's pretty obvious he doesn't understand what good design actually is:

> I envision compiler options and code annotations for requesting rules to be enforced. The most obvious would be to request guaranteed full type-and-resource safety.

You'd think someone that worked on a compiler for decades would come to the realisation that opt-in safety is just dumb. You want everything to be safe by default, despite the performance implications, and then allow programmers to peel back safety features explicitly where they are not needed.

You don't buy a gun and the safety lock as an add-on.

Borrowing from Donald Norman and his Design of Everyday Things book, safe programming in C and C++ relies too much on "knowledge in the head" instead of "knowledge in the world" in order to do it correctly.

You don't need the big borrow-checker hammer from Rust to be a lot better. Most CVEs (memory safety related) are about out-of-bounds writes/reads. You could mitigate a huge chunk of those problems by just doing something as sensible as having a well defined concept of slices with bounds checking turned on by default.

But this seems to elude the C and the C++ committee for some weird reason.
The prompt can be useful in crafting attacks that rely on prompt injection. For example- and this doesn't work- an attacker can ask a user to write a specific question to the AI and the answer could contain malicious code(like an XSS).
Huh? You only rebase when you're either:

* Trying to shorten commit history

* Trying to merge feature branches together (main or other feature branches)

* Trying to remove feature branches

None of which are necessary in a lot of development models. If you have that many feature branches that you have to rebase constantly, it doesn't sound like feature branches as a concept are properly understood.

The idea behind feature branching is one of 2 models:

1) either the main branch always works, and development is done in a feature branch, only to be rebased into main when development, testing, and sign off occurred, or

2) serious bug fixes occur outside the main branch, to be re-incorporated back into the main branch once it's been proven to be effective.

The 1st model should only require a rebase when the feature is complete. The 2nd model MAY require a couple of rebasing, dependent on how extensive the bug fixes are, and how fast the main branch is moving along, but not to the point where constant interactively rebasing your branches is the norm.
I rather think our house is pretty optimal for this given where we live. Slab on grade in socal, where AC is more of a concern than heating.
I have to admit, I got vaccinated. But now I really don't see any reason why we should do that. The situation is better, the mortality rate is lower. I suspect it's all about fearmongering and profits again.
It's why massive increases to speed, processing power,
and communication bandwidth have resulted in no real
net increase to web-browsing speed for the last 10 years.

nor to developer productivity, either. I feel that has massively decreased in the last decade.

There are clearly cases where complex build/CI/CD pipelines make sense, but people now believe they need big enterprisey FAANG-scale solutions even when they don't.
Svelte and CSS
For the past months, I have been using Svelte and SvelteKit more and more. And I'm absolutely a big fan of everything about them.

Things like how close the language and the framework stay to native BTML, CSS and JS.

And also how Svelte handle styling (which is the topic of the linked post).
If you think math problem context drives social change then you are going to have to go find me data on people suddenly buying 37 watermelons at a time after math problems we got in the early 2000s
I'd probably go with a phrase more like "innocent idiot" than dumb blonde. It even has alliteration, rolls off the tongue nicely in the courtroom for a jury.
Actual study:

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b04168

It basically says PLA emits lactic acid and ABS a bunch of nastiness. There wasn’t much to indicate PLA emissions were particularly dangerous. That said, I’d not suggest locking yourself in a closet with your 3D printer. But given abs is full of nastiness and everything I’ve ever read about printing with it says it’s toxic and to ventilate, this article from 3 years ago doesn’t seem that interesting.
It's very rare and extremely interesting for me to read a well-argued opinion that is the polar opposite of mine.

Furthermore, I don't even have any good counter-arguments (at least not any that wouldn't just be pure speculation).

You definitely gave me something new to think about.

Thank you for your thoughts!
For starters, I use https://hckrnews.com/ and filter it down to the top ten articles.

Like many people with ADHD, I have a tendency to hyper-focus on things, and if I don't have something that I'm focused on I tend to get depressed. Over the years (a lot of years, self-awareness is not a strong suit), I've become more familiar with my patterns and tried to accommodate them and make healthy choices.

It's easy for me to hyper-focus on a series of novels and devour them and not feel too guilty (this is better for sleep). When I'm hyper-focused on a development project or a work problem, it tends to disrupt my sleep patterns more. When stuff like that happens I try to make a lot of notes about the things intruding on my thoughts, so that I can put them to rest for the night and not feel like I need to address them now.

Similarly, if a subject is really interesting and I don't want to lose track of it, I'll save all of the articles in Pocket and know that I can revisit the subject.

Lastly: I have kids and they do not care what you are interested in right now. They're great at pulling me away from what I'm absorbed in.
Not volatile, but Optane? Even in the era of super fast pcie4 ssds, the random read times for optane is like 6-10x faster. Fast enough that intel put optane into ram module for persistence.

Plus intel sold nand ssd drives (model H20?) that had a 32gb optane module on board. You can just use the optane for swap and the nand as your main drive.
The Stickiest Non-Sticky Substance [video]
Marvel seems like it'd be even worse since A) the storylines all intertwine, so you feel like you have "homework" to watch before seeing the latest one, and B) they're all pretty much superhero movies.

With Star Wars, creators can ignore the tired Skywalker storyline, plus there's no genre expectations tying creators down (IMO sci-fi is not a genre so much as a meta-genre or motif). At least in theory--they've been pretty reluctant to spread their wings until recently.
Cities still hold a large portion of the population of the US and a lot of jobs can't just be done remotely even if employers actually adopted remote work which many really really don't want to. Housing isn't just a problem in Manhattan and SF it's hitting cities and suburbs everywhere.
How do you measure the value add of a full-time construction worker?
Or, "illegal immigrant" is a sometimes-used dysphemism for "undocumented immigrant". I'm not aware of any other class of people who break a law who are called "illegal" as a result; it's a rather dehumanizing impulse.
I've never had an unsafe-free rust program crash by segmentation fault, or crash at all.

But I remember having off-by-one errors doing just that in basic for-loops in C++.
Bingo. The issue here is that ZF and ZFC are both first order theories. They can only talk about things that can be defined within them, not things that cannot be defined within them. The wiki article talks about that where it says:

> Informally, the theorem says that the concept of truth of first-order arithmetic statements cannot be defined by a formula in first-order arithmetic. This implies a major limitation on the scope of "self-representation". It is possible to define a formula True(n){\displaystyle True(n)} whose extension is T∗,{\displaystyle T^{*},} but only by drawing on a metalanguage whose expressive power goes beyond that of L.L. For example, a truth predicate for first-order arithmetic can be defined in second-order arithmetic. However, this formula would only be able to define a truth predicate for formulas in the original language L.L. To define a truth predicate for the metalanguage would require a still higher metametalanguage, and so on.
> made the required rent higher

If, all along, you could have rented it out for more money ... why were you planning to rent it out for less money? I get that you wouldn't have to, but it appears that the "market rate rent" was higher than you initially anticipated.

As a corollary, assuming that you had initially planned on the highest rent that the market would bear...it seems that after a year of unexpected delays you'd most likely still choose to finish the project even at a loss. This is because all the loss would have already been sunk cost that you can't change anymore, and at the "original maximum rent the market would bear" you'd still make your IRR/ROI on the marginal future investment of finishing the construction.

So, assuming you couldn't raise the rent, you'd lose money either way, but you'd lose less money by finishing the construction vs. losing more money by abandoning the project entirely.
Playstation VR2: 13 new titles and launch lineup
Show HN: Fileport – Teleport Your Files
Hello HN,

Fileport is an online service that provides the fastest way to send files over the internet.

Typically, email providers have file size restrictions and online cloud storage can be cumbersome to use. Fileport is the simplest way of transferring large files from point A to B. Intended for creative individuals like artists, video/audio editors, photographers showcasing their work or anyone whose work depends on exchanging large files.

Fileport is capable of “streaming” files to the recipient (or multiple recipients) as you upload them. You can upload multiple files or folders which can be downloaded in a compressed format, even while uploading. Files are automatically checksummed for integrity during the upload process.

There is a subscription available for users that require more features, like Photobooks. Photobooks are online photo & video albums that provide an ultra fast and clean web interface with all original files available for download.

Files up to 2 GB can be uploaded by anyone without the need of an account.
Gaming voices are available
> I mean that it's not clear how time is going to fix Nix's documentation.

This is my estimate based on the work that has happened over the last two years. There is steady movement in the right direction and the community is organized alongside the NixOS Foundation members to make things happen. Just not at a break-neck pace. Places like Determinate Systems, Tweag, etc are the largest forces currently, but there are plenty of others that are trying to move things along. Over time, that steady movement will land Nix in a place where its pains have been largely dealt with. I don't think we're there yet and, at this pace, won't be for a while.