skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The original meaning of the word "rob" in the Slavic languages was "slave".

From it, words sounding more or less like "robota" were derived, which designated what a slave does, i.e. forced labor.

Centuries later, in some of the Slavic languages the word "robota" (with slightly different pronunciations from language to language) or words derived from it, evolved to mean work in the general sense, not only forced work.
Surely just going between 80% to 20% would still be worthwhile, I understand this is for more amenable to a battery than a full fast discharge cycle.

Indeed as this becomes more of an option I trust that car producers could look at engineering their batteries with this in mind.
LL are the best radar designers on earth, full stop. They do some neat cyber research, too.

Don’t work there, but work very closely with them.
I'm sure that beyond data Google also has a future use for Stadia tech elsewhere, secured a zillion new patents, and so on.

That's the thing with Google. They can get away with anything and keep failing upwards.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1028682/russia-federal-b...

True, but with less revenue in the future and higher inflation. Also, they are killing off lots of the men needed in their workforce. Higher revenue is just being burned in $100MM missile strikes.
The British Raj in India came about roughly 100 years after the start of the Industrial Revolution in Britain.
Linus is cocky and arrogant, I mean rightfully so but still....
Subscribe Wherever You Get Your Content
You can import a Structurizr workspace JSON by exporting your DSL using the Structurizr CLI tool. https://structurizr.com/help/cli Reach out if you need more support on this
That's not why Russia started the war
FTC Proposes Nationwide Ban on Post-Termination Non-Compete Agreements
I loved the straightforwardness of just having a nice simple HTML page with some <?PHP ?> sprinkled in. Now everything has to be done through a million layers of indirection. Which is fine when it's necessary, but I still like to write my own pages as simple unstructured PHP.
>"planned, organized, or arranged in advance (often of an event or situation intended to seem otherwise)." - Oxford English Dictionary

Seems to me it's the very definition of staged. They arranged all aspects of the route in a way that typical driving wouldn't allow and then selectively released information about how it went. Seems unlikely Musk's intended readers to know how the actual drive went when he tweeted "Tesla drives itself (no human input at all) thru urban streets to highway to streets, then finds a parking spot"

The only real argument that can be made here is some variant of "all demos are staged and everyone should have known not to believe the car can actually behave that way outside of a demo"
I use a thinkpad USB-C dock on my M1 Max MBP. My only complaint is that the displays do not work with FileVault. Apparently the driver will not load until the boot volume is decrypted.

It would be nice if apple made a good, trusted docking station that just works with their laptops.
Why do you say that? But, as to why a a strip, because you appear to walk in a straight line but end up at the same point. It could have been a sphere too, but you have more dimensions to move in, and they aren't nearly as cool.
The legal term is "real party in interest (RPI) "

There are already laws regarding naming the RPI:

[1] https://definitions.uslegal.com/r/real-party-in-interest/

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_party_in_interest

[3] https://www.projectjurisprudence.com/2017/08/whos-real-party...
do you have source for windows not being supported? I can’t find one after a quick search
I've long believed that Japan, while technically not having any nuclear weapons, has the separate components on hand to assemble them within days if they so chose.

Maybe hours.
The article is quite literally a[1] review of exactly how we might evaluate that, with evidence of people who got results.

[1] To be fair, way to wordy and blowhardated version. Alexander seems to be getting worse and not better. The core ideas here could be presented in about a third the space.
Show HN: Luanalysis – Statically type checked Lua IDE
Just released v1.4.0 of my open source Lua IDE (Jetbrains plugin) with support for optional bolt-on types specified as regular Lua comments.

Biggest new feature is support for optional parameters (previously supported, but cumbersome with overloads).
This is the disadvantage of authoritarian systems. They are more capable of making stupid decisions because there are fewer voices.
I actually ordered a Light Phone II a few days ago. I'm not looking to completely replace my iPhone 11 — It works great and I use it all the time and I don't feel like I need to limit myself.

What sent me on a quest for a dumb(er) phone was to be able to leave the house without my main phone because I didn't want to be contacted unless it was an emergency (by either my wife or my kids).

It sucks that the phone has essentially become the main way for all communication — From emergency texts to please remember the milk to hey how is it going to happy birthday to our child from the kids' orthodontist! My wife and I lament about this merging of priorities into phone form all the time. We've been experimenting with basically being in Do Not Disturb mode all the time and yes, people get annoyed when it takes hours to respond, but our lives are better.

What I really want though, it is be just about completely disconnected. So, I'm going to experiment with using a second phone number for when I'm out and about for a few hours. I plan on using a dumb(er) phone with this phone number.

I really wanted to the Punkt or the Mutida but they don't have GPS which to me is a feature I don't think I can live without and they have problems with some of the carriers in the US which I didn't want to have to deal with. I hope we can end up with different feature sets on phones going forward.
Wireguard is a small team (I think) and they are actually focusing on other platform right now but they will get back to Windows.

https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2022-September/0...
Fluorescence is spectrum shifted retransmission.

Energy arrives on some wavelengths, it departs on others.

"Three spatial dimensions" Vs. "Four spatial dimensions" is suggesting the existence of a further spatial dimension orthogonal to our own and is a bit fanciful, however ...

It's legit to look at the evolution of analytic forms from 2 to 3 to 4 to higher (N) dimensions not just for the fun of abstraction but also for the application to phase spaces [1] .. where systems are described using multiple independent orthoganl dimensions to plot the system state at any time and the transitions from one state to another.

I see no issue with looking at energy transposition through phase space, and there are applications.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_space
I've noticed a variation on this too, except I stuck with it too long. Scheme (once built out, like Racket and others have done) is easily one of the best languages, on technical merits, but I'm not using it lately, while aware of what I'm missing...

Since using Scheme/Racket heavily, I've used three major popular languages, and each has a lot of painful problems, that feel like regressions:

* Major Language X was obviously intended for much simpler needs, but kept getting extended to get closer to what was already known from other languages when it was created, the official docs often seem written as if with no awareness of a reader, and a Web search results are mostly maddening SEO by people who don't seem to understand much about the subject matter.

* Major Language Y has some merits, but a key DSL seems fundamentally wrong in execution, like a kludge that doesn't reflect what was already known decades ago, and they basically just didn't do documentation yet, and I had to do heroics to work around implementation and design flakiness in a key framework and an important library.

* Major Language Z actually shows a lot of positive signs, including cross-pollination in many small details, but at some point there was a breakdown of coherent design for a while, and some poor decisions made, which would be a lot easier to look past were it legacy from much longer ago than it was.

That said, Scheme and Racket also have their technical and community drawbacks. Also, more pragmatically, too often lately I've seen hiring situations where they really-really need some engineering magic done... but they're hung up on filtering resumes for ThisYearsPopularFramework2, and believe that's the most important qualification. So, lately, I also use the currently popular tools, even when it's incarnation #23 of something I've seen before (not done as well #4, #5, #7, and #16), and make it work despite/because I'm painfully aware of the weaknesses.
> “Mentioning whether or not Eric wore a helmet is akin to blaming an egg for cracking against a pan,” wrote Ng’s friend

It's funny how reports of ejections from a crashed motor vehicle never mention that the driver wasn't wearing a seat belt as if their death was an act of god but cyclists have to be chastised as a blame shifting exercise to justify continued ostracism.
Which reminds me of the rather unfortunate picture of a mouse with a grown human ear cartiledge implanted in its back, I think they were testing for rejection.

That photo comes up so often when people are talking about science going adrift, it was benign but the image is so powerful.
Don't go inside
I remember checking out electric make years ago for a project. It was from electric cloud and I believe it was somehow related to the creator of tcl. It would hook into the filesystem to understand everything that was being built. If there was a hidden dependency it would record it and could restart steps to build in the correct order.

It was pretty smart - I suspect you could write a really crappy makefile and coast.

this was probably 20 years ago.
One way to find out!
I used a TrackPoint for years and I absolutely believe that I damaged the big joint in my index finger from the required lateral force of that input method.
There's tons of places that talk about this, perhaps start here: https://www.reddit.com/r/TrackPoint_Builders/
That's not what your link says:

> Cancian explained that the Chinese missile force is devastating to the U.S. and its allies for as long as their inventory of missiles lasts.

> Cancian said submarines and bombers that can launch long-range missiles are “particularly important” for the success of the U.S. side

I don't contest that the US would have casualty but the fact that they know this alone tells you it is unlikely for the US to attack head on with fighter jets and carriers. The bases around china and inter-continental targeting capabilities are crucial in disabling their defenses. Both sides would lose millions but the US military industrial comples is unrivaled. It will basically replace important ammunition, missiles,etc... at a decent pace once it is mobilized. It will take 4weeks+ before a ground invasion in the mean time there is no scenario where China's navy won't get wiped out before a ground invasion. So it would be a matter of who can maintain their supply chain the longest without running out of soldiers and airmen.

Keep in mind, the US military practices an invasion every generation. The PLA has less battle experience and much like the US and it's voters the CCP must maintain internal support despite their economy getting decimated. On the other hand, Americans will be more squeamish about things like civilian targets which is a major weakness in the short term but the possibility of actual economic recovery if a US friendly regime takes over leadership in China will be a huge advantage in winning the war without going nuclear.
The Romans never had access to coal, which was the energy-dense fuel that made the Industrial Revolution possible.

Bret Devereaux has a (long) post on this, which I recommend:

https://acoup.blog/2022/08/26/collections-why-no-roman-indus...
Along this line, I like how memory leaks just can't be a thing because the page only exists so long as it's being rendered.
When it comes to the dangers threatening cyclists, wearing a helmet is like bringing a knife to a gunfight. America’s top-selling vehicle model, the Ford F-Series, weighs up to 7,500 pounds. Its hood stands 4.5 feet tall—at the height of my chin.

I get that point. And the other points made here about defense against traffic and cars. But helmets protect against WAY more than getting hit by a truck. They protect you when your foot gets stuck and you fall over backwards onto concrete. They protect you when you flip over and the bike comes back around and the chain ring takes a chunk out of the helmet instead of your head. Helmets stop injuries and many other ways.
The only way to eliminate thinking that can be "controversial" is to eliminate all forms of thinking.
Long article discussing various societal aspects and knock on effects, but ultimately the key bit is towards the end:

>Regardless, experts I spoke to were unanimous about what these flaws don’t mean: that helmets are useless. They all believe you should wear one.
> There are many zombie environmental groups that will continue to fight against anything humans try to change about the built environment, but over time the astonishingly good economics will move them to the side.

I think environmental groups are just the tip of the iceberg that gets blamed for things because they're visible. They just don't have that much political clout (aside from the very large "environmental group" that's people who are concerned about climate change -- which may be a majority of all living humans at this point).

As an example, consider strict environmental regulations on oil refineries. It seems like those must be pushed by environmental groups, right? But it can also be a case of regulatory capture by the incumbent refineries. The regulations don't apply to them because they were grandfathered in, but the regulations are their moat protecting them from any upstart competitors.

Or consider fuel economy standards. Those must be pushed by environmentalists, right? But then why do light pickup trucks have very strict fuel economy standards, and larger trucks have looser, easier-to-meet standards to the point where it's hard to actually make a light truck that conforms to the standards and isn't really slow and underpowered. It's almost like the incumbent automakers have been successful at lobbying for regulations that protect the lucrative market for oversized trucks by ensuring that smaller trucks are unappealing, unavailable, or too expensive. (The chicken tax is another example.)
The key to knowing when to when to quit is being financially able to quit in the first place.

A lot of people get stuck and are unable to afford to quit.
Title suggests (to me) a starkly different attitude in the tweet than what’s actually in it. The quotes are verbatim, but I was expecting a dismissal of the quoted students’ disposition, rather than a professor meaningfully addressing their concerns by making the expectations more emotionally supportive.

I’m not suggesting a change to the title, it’s probably best to keep it. This was a pleasant surprise and one I think other readers might benefit from.
I was indeed being genuine with my question, as I see these hacks (Mazda headunit too) but I’m curious if I’m missing the point other than the sake of tinkering.
Like ChatGPT, and like 3-hour podcasts, he gets longer over time because he's trained on RLHF from his readers.
The conclusion makes it clear that every expert they spoke to made it unambiguously clear that helmets should be worn:

> Regardless, experts I spoke to were unanimous about what these flaws don’t mean: that helmets are useless. They all believe you should wear one.

This is one of those articles that reads like a lot of claims against something, even though the conclusion is very clearly in favor of it.

There are some valid concerns about how bike safety needs to extend beyond just the helmet, but the middle sections trying to suggest that maybe helmets are bad just feels like bait.
I gave up on Gmail spam filtering a few years ago and created a rule to send messages to inbox. I don't get that much spam, so it's not too bad. But then again, Gmail probably has some black-box filters that removes messages that I'll never see.

The real horror show is Outlook/live.com. The spam filter is super aggressive, and if you don't have the sender marked as a safe sender, it will get sent to spam. I've missed invoices, tax and government communication, important messages from friends I hadn't talked to in a while, invites to events, job offers, and more.

What's even worse is that Outlook automatically deletes messages in the spam folder every ten days. I don't always check my email frequently, so sometimes I'll never see an email before it is gone. There is no way to extend this period, or disable the spam filtering functionality altogether.

Outlook might be free, but it has cost me a lot.

When I open up outlook, the first place I go to is the spam folder, because that is where the important emails are. At one time, I even had a reminder in my calendar to check the spam box every few days. It's such an user-hostile way to do spam filtering, as it forces me to pay _more_ attention to spam. I'd rather just have them dump everything in my inbox, and deal with it myself.

I think it's about time that I moved away from these email services.
I think the pain in the West would be relatively short-term while they are rebuilding manufacturing capacity. Globalization has hurt a lot of workers in the West so it may actually positive for them. China on the other hand would have nobody to sell their stuff to.
An invasion of Taiwan would also be much more expensive and difficult than a land invasion, and unprecedented for China to boot. Russia conducted a soft invasion of Ukraine in 2014 and seized Crimea long before 2022. China has also not fought a recent war- even prior to the war in the Donbas, Russia had already invaded Georgia. So it's not necessarily as easy a mistake to make, with different cost-benefit calculations.
Because vietnam and afghanistan changed US voter's minds. The loss was political boredom not military. Civilians lead even in matters of war with the US. That's why I said China will use it's intel network to win any war before it starts
Some folks over at r/ergomechkeyboards have done this (for example https://redd.it/yhioec). Also probably worth checking out https://www.reddit.com/r/trackpoint_builders
> just as we have to almost every part of the earth.

Do you have an idea of the ratio between the species human has been moving around vs the number of species in existence?

> In contrast to this worldview that humans are the agents of mass-extinction

Wait wait wait. This is a fact. We are living a mass extinction now, it is acted. We, human, have removed 2/3 of trees, 2/3 of mammals, and 2/3 of insects from Earth. Mostly because of the loss of habitat (not Climate Change, this still has to come as a bonus, and definitely won't help).

It is not hypothetical, it is not a worldview. It is a fact. Of all the species that lived on Earth at the same time as humans, the number of species that got decimated because of humans is so much higher than the number that humans may bring to space (should we ever succeed, which is far from certain) that it feels absolutely wrong to consider that "humans are the only ticket to survival for every species on earth". Pretty much every species on Earth would be better off without humans.

And again: preserving life on Earth is much easier than bringing it to space (and we are failing at it right now). The asteroid scenario is completely ridiculous: again it's far easier to prevent the asteroid from colliding with Earth than to send a few species to survive in space.
yes, rapidjson also supports optional insitu parsing.
This is sad news but not a surprise, thanks for linking this article, it was informative.
Reid Hoffman – Talking AI with AI: Introducing Fireside Chatbots
Well, CCP is an extremely authoritarian state, and plenty of their constituents would love to be able to access western apps/services.

The cool thing is that US, for all its faults, is not like that, and shouldn't aspire to be like that. If the US constituents want to access TikTok, they should be able to, unless it poses some actual danger. An example of such danger would be what led to the recent ban on Huawei equipment in the networking infra, which I fully support.

But TikTok ain't it, and this is just pure "well those nasty guys did this nasty thing, so we are gonna do the same nasty thing because uhhhh they did that thing!"
The situation is different, think about nodes and encrypted channels between them.

If you encrypt traffic on your host properly and send it off to a remote host, your ISP (node(s) in between) sees encrypted traffic.

If you create an encrypted VPN connection to a VPN providers server and then configure a second encrypted connection (e.g. through Tor) from that VPN providers server to a remote host, then your VPN provider is able to see exactly what happened on that VPN providers server; since that’s where the encryption (and decryption) happens.
I have one of these that I’m going to be recapping soon actually
I've been staring at your comment trying to decide if it's intentional smugness or ignorance. I'm going to assume good faith.

There were multiple countries with little to no impact from the GFC[1]. These countries include billions of people, and significant portions of the worlds GDP. Most western economies had recovered in 3-5 years[2].

Not everyone felt it and felt it hard, nor was this everywhere. I'm not arguing semantics, for billions of people it was effectively a non issue.

1. https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/go...
2. https://bigeconomics.org/the-countries-most-and-least-affect...
> the loss of any military restraint from NATO.

MAD.

And what is it that presently restrains NATO? MAD.
Pretty much most senior level/grad algorithm classes are like this. They introduce a framework for solution and then give you about 2-3 example lecture problems that they walk you through. 2-3 weeks after being introduced to 5/6 frameworks its Exam day. You are given unique word problems that, in the eyes of someone experienced like a prof or PhD student, is trivial. But you are struggling with 1 week of homework experience to fit a word problem into one of the frameworks you studied. There just was not enough time dedicated to dissecting how to parse word problem, look for patterns, map it to a framework. It was basically left to the student to figure it out in 1 week based on 3-4 homework problems. On exam day you are just emotionally devastated looking at the problem not knowing where to start - you keep throwing various framework structures on the problem hoping some hints of a solution bounce back at you.

But there are smart people who get all this stuff "easily" (previous practice, exposure). The rest of us walk out of the exam wondering how many trucks hit us.
Should is fine. Must is not.
So then what does disabling it accomplish?
They are hard and slick on the outside to allow your head to slide along with your body, instead of snapping; protecting your neck.
thanks for the info!

I have very limited knowledge of these things but I did compare matmul with PyTorch using GPU vs not and there is a dramatic improvement. So even if its not fully optimised yet, it's still a huge bonus to have this available. If it could be improved another 4-6x that would be stupendous.

(For context: am observing an 8000x8000 matrix takes ~1s to multiply with CPU and 5ms to multiply with GPU).
> > In the context of quitting something successful, why would you?

At some point people get tired of playing Stairway to Heaven for the 1300th time, even if you are the guys who wrote Stairway to Heaven.

They want to drive a Ferrari through the Cork Screw corner in Laguna Seca or buy an apartment in Central Park West instead.