skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I hope there’s a gong sound too.
Former AWS security here. Cloud operators are EXTREMELY interested in maintaining the reputation of their IP address space; I promise you that abuse complaints are taken very seriously, investigated and acted on.
Changing housing laws and regulations will help solve the housing crisis.

We must wake up to a new age, where we do not regulate ourselves into a class struggle.

Firstly there are those RIDICULOUS, designed for cars. Stop designing around cars.

Next rethink the habitability model. Micro habitation with common facilities is rightly horrifying to arrogant slobs, yet is sufficient to excellent for civilized solo habitation. Cut back the space overhead in dense urban environments.
> The big issue is most people in a work relationship are not even capable of changing work patterns

If only watching the entire Star Trek: The Next Generation series was part of the onboarding process. If you watch this show through a lens of how it applies back to real life and team dynamics it's as close as you can get to guaranteeing success.
A 30xx series GPU is at most about 2 years old. Silicon processes are often qualified for a 10 year *continuous* operating lifetime, and that’s for junction temperatures that are much higher than 80C.

For example this TI report mentions a typical lifetime of 10 years at 105C.
You raise good points, but I think your point is actually compatible with, rather than at odds with the article.

For example, someone that likes to take conflict head on will deeply dislike their own desire to be avoidant, and for example will likely deeply regret the few times they failed to take a conflict head on.

In any such scale, e.g. being deceptive vs truthful, everybody has a bit of both, and if they identify strongly with one end, they also dislike the part of themselves that is opposite of that (a la Carl Jung's shadow concept).

I think most people are actually pretty successful at suppressing parts of themselves they most dislike unless they are suffering from addiction or depression, etc.
I just tried compiling newest Qemu from Qemu git repo, and newest ReactOS 32bit nightly, it works great with networking support, with these instructions that work for any Debian or Ubuntu based Linux on any CPU:

https://github.com/AsahiLinux/docs/wiki/SW%3AUbuntu-Asahi-Qe...
In general, I don't like the term "anti-pattern" or its sibling "best practices". Those terms give off an authoritative aura instead of spurring curiosity, and often people don't seem to remember the rationale but just associate X with absolute bad and Y with absolute good.

Softer language like "guidelines" and "recommendations" or playful language like "tricks" or "hacks" seems more useful to me. "Hacks" is dirty and _interesting_ instead of normative and unquestionable.
> What specifically would you want to be different?

It's sold for data exploration, so i except some useful data-app with an up to date interface, dedicated for interactive navigation and presentation of data.

> It seems to me to serve the purpose well:

Not really. This looks like something that could even run on Internet Explorer 2. It has significant flaws in terms of UI and UX, and lacking nearly everything I except here.

It's incredibly wasteful on space. I must scroll down two screens to even see some data. For some reason the map is high jacking the scroll down, and the map is so broken that I end with multiple earths displayed, with only one having actual data. Changes to the query are not in-place, the whole side is reloads every time. Adding a new filter only seems to work after a reload. And all information are really sparse and scattered randomly around. And finally, there seems to be no way to shape the actual output, which would be the main job of a data explorer.
> 7. If they cheat at small things, they will cheat at big things.

This is old adage bullshit. It’s simple enough to make sense intuitively, there are similar sayings in almost every culture, so it must be true, right ?

Except in practice people don’t work that way. Some might cheat at small and big big things, but most of us still apply different principle to different things.

Try to apply it to yourself: if a coworker left their desk unintended you could enjoy yourself messing with their system settings. If on top of that they left their bank account unintended you wouldn’t shuffle their savings options and hide their money in obscure accounts.

In a way, people deeply believing this are super scary to me. Do they work see their own little lies as an effect of an internal broken moral system ?
I considered that as well, but price-wise you're now getting into Mac Studio territory, and it's not clear at all which of the two comes out on top.

So I'll wait for benchmarks. I can recommend the MaxTech channel on Youtube for this sort of stuff.
> It does seem like young people these days have an incredibly distorted sense of what they "deserve" or what they can afford or what's "normal".

I, being fairly young, think that fulltime jobs paying a living wage ought to be normal. Many don't - https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/working-poor/2020/home.htm

Some people are going to overspend and be careless with their money, but that's not the core problem in the US. The core problem is unfairly low wages for many workers.
You can do OO programming in assembler, but that doesn't make assembler an OO language; the same applies to C. Therefore C cannot be "O-O enough" by definition, and nobody who knows an OO language can seriously state that "O-O does not add much power".
Well I figured we lost almost half a million in WW2, at a population 1/3 of what we have now.

How many people do you think the CCP will sacrifice to take Taiwan?
A bit shock. I purchased two 1080ti based in his recommendation many years ago. I looked at the chart. Is it really these cards are still there above the middle. Is there something wrong. Even the memory is not that bad.

Seems to move to 24G meant 3090 …
I was "laid off" from a job a few months ago. I put "laid off" in quotes because I'm reasonably certain that they were just being nice and didn't want to tarnish my resume more than they had to. By all accounts I was most certainly fired. [1]

I had a pretty bad attitude and had trouble focusing on work. I thought it was depression, and that's probably a factor of it, but having been unemployed for the last three months now, I think I was just going through a really bad case of burnout. I didn't really want to do anything productive, I just felt bad, and as a result I was missing deadlines and not doing terribly well, and eventually they decided to let me go. They told me it was budget cuts, but I think that might have been more of a catalyst than a cause, and this was depressing because by all accounts this was the best job I'd ever had.

If anyone's reading this, take burnout (and depression) seriously. I lost a great job because I didn't.

[1] I'm reasonably confident you could figure out which company I'm talking about with some searching, but I politely ask that you don't post it here if you do.
Indeed - I would argue it is _much_ worse.
monorepo is a good idea. how do you manage multiple languages and build toolchains?
Lol for real.

lol = laugh out loud
Would you mind noting what language you were working in?
Here's some PHP code to handle page numbering :-

<?php

$pagenum = 1;

$pagenum++;

print("Page: $pagenum");

?>
Unfortunately this only works if you have javascript enabled on the site, too, and the awful popups they added made me disable it.
I'm always happy to see them give Auralnauts some new footage to play with:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAmyZP-qbTE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAmfJgqw3oU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFtUHVgw-gQ
Is it moving them from "zero" to "likely", or from "zero" to "nonzero but still very unlikely"?

Because for a lot of people it's really the latter, and it's no surprise when working out hard to basically buy a lottery ticket is not something they are enthusiastic about.
Is sexuality the only conflicting thing we can think of nowadays? I can think of at least 10 things people might freak out about me, without even getting to thinking about what sexuality I may have.

In general I agree with the premise of "You need to find people who are capable of understanding you".

It's actually a combination of that and your feeling about yourself. I'm not sure how to describe it, but I'll just call it once you're in balance with yourself, i.e. in an okay(maybe not perfect or ideal) mental state, and you have some sort of pillar you can lean on(your beliefs, your understanding of the world, etc.), then its no longer about your desire to get others to accept you, but rather putting yourself in an environment where you feel okay.
Adults have busy lives, all of us do, if you don't understand that being consistently late impacts other lives you have no respect for others, I don't care what childhood trauma you had.

I know no serial "sorry for being late" that isn't deeply self-centered.
Messing with someone is not cheating.

Cheating at golf is cheating.
No, but I do think that both of these things are revealing to us just how bad highly technical people and highly intuitive and empathetic people are at properly communicating with one another.

(It is a broad generalization to assume that these traits are mutually exclusive. They do, of course, co-exist in many people. However, it seems to me that the number of people in whom they coexist robustly are few. However, if is these few from whence come true once-in-a-generation geniuses.)
That's good. I really also hope they shook up their designs at the same time.

I probably still wouldn't buy a new one for a few years. I'd imagine thieves either don't know this, or do but can't tell model years apart clearly. Meaning there's a good chance your car may be broken into still, just not driven off with.
You might choose to believe that, but `Option` and `Result` are practically purpose-built in Rust to work extremely well with functional approaches.

And doing so greatly increases the likelihood that the compiler can produce perfectly optimal code around them.
A few important ones are missing or are unclear, but some of these techniques evolve getting closer to people. So trying to findout about it can be an exausting experience. Otherwise can take a year or two.
Now that's how you write a headline.
I like the structure and insight of the argument, but I think it needs some re-working.

Definition 1 could be broadened to: "Loneliness is when we aren't known and loved by others."

Loneliness can occur because we're socially isolated for some reason. It can also occur when we're with others who don't know us, because we're not willing or able to open up to them. This could be because we are afraid to be real with others, but it could also be because we're afraid to be real with ourselves.

There's nothing like being real with yourself, being real with others, being loved by others who really know you, and knowing/loving them as well.

Incidentally, this ties in with Christianity's value proposition: no human can both know and love you perfectly, but God can and will to those who receive his gospel.
Here's some PHP code to handle page numbering (page breaks are no problem at all rendering html to pdf) :-

<?php

$pagenum = 1;

$pagenum++;

print("Page: $pagenum");

?>
I forget that every single time I comment on this site I need to include the caveat that if you were born a blind diabetic in Monrovia in the middle of a gunfight in which both your parents died and left you with a debt to the mafia, I don't begrudge you your choices, moral or otherwise.

However, if what you got from either my or the author's take is that we believe rich people are inherently more virtuous by dint of having not been tested, I'm not sure the problem is in either my writing or that in the article.
There's a huge difference between spoken and written communications. Don't use the same methods for both.

Over-explaining comes from lack of confidence: either in yourself or in your estimate of the other person to understand. Talk slower, take pauses, and be more interactive. Don't rush.

Provide the right amount of context. Gauge if they need more or you can shorten it. Go back and fill in if necessary. Different people listen differently. Some want the facts. Some want the story of how the facts were determined, etc. Effective communication isn't easy.

Btw, the way you wrote your post is in good form for someone like me to take in. I tend to overestimate others ability to understand and speak tersely. At the same time, I'll usually always start with some context. I know some people who just start blurting thoughts out of nowhere expecting you to have read their mind for context.
Why are transformers and large language models (which AFAIK use transformers, e.g Generative Pre-trained Transformer) in different boxes in the decision tree? They yield the same conclusion so I guess it's fine.
I know I'm supposed to prefer hard numbers, but for two-pizza teams you kinda know whether things are going well or not without measurement. You may not know exactly why, but Dora doesn't tell you that either (per TFA).

There are bigger fish to fry, IMNSHO: are you working on/building the right thing, why are we paying so much for performance monitoring and what value are we getting from it, why does the CEO say one thing and his minions say something else?
Electron providing the UI is exactly what most people are referring to when they say "containerized web app", only because this paradigm of split backend for electron apps is less common.
It's definitely one of the factors.
The only technique I’ve ever relied on without fail is to trust my gut.
When I saw that it has an AST-sensitive debugger, I was really impressed! And the code for it is quite something to behold - aside from the fact it could be broken into a couple files and have a few more comments, it's the type of thing that truly shows off how this is a well-designed codebase with a nearly self-documenting extension API!

https://github.com/thonny/thonny/blob/bd9614be483e80c28b0166...
Not a great analogy. It’s more like if you steal their lunch you are more likely to steal money out of their wallet if you run short. Or, if you’ll lie on an expense report, you are more likely to falsely shift the blame to them when the chips are down.

It’s not a foregone conclusion, but there is a correlation.
My friend! This is a fantastic use for the great exiftool. Here's a link [0] to their (also good) forums where it's implemented by the author in this one-liner:

exiftool -o . '-Directory<FileModifyDate' '-Directory<DateTimeOriginal' -d $TARGETDIR/%Y/%m_%B/%Y.%m.%d -r $SOURCEDIR

[0] https://exiftool.org/forum/index.php?topic=6170.0

[1] http://archive.today/e4JJQ (archive of [0] for posterity)
Actually, he's exploring the metaverse now.

https://twitter.com/AssLatam/status/1615321859066560514
What is your basis for the assertion that it's always a choice? If it's personal experience, have you considered that yours is not necessarily representative of other people's? Even if you were happy while being in a bad spot before, that doesn't automatically generalize even for yourself, much less for everyone else.
At Steam, there is usually mention about ReactOS, if game works on ReactOS.
As opposed to not letting anyone run it, I mean.
What statistics source are you using to determine the 'largest framework' here?

Even if we go back to the 2021 Jetbrains developer survey (https://www.jetbrains.com/lp/devecosystem-2021/php/) out of the 11 named frameworks/platforms people are using all but 2 of them use PSR and composer.

You keep making these assertations which frankly are coming across as absolute bollocks from someone who's stuck in the early 2000s.
How should the metaverse be visually portrayed? The VR headset/goggles immediately signal "new technology" to readers. The flat screen metaverse you've described just sounds like Second Life or a video game. It may be more accurate, but it doesn't necessarily capture people's attention.
> 4. time & money: I tend to either waste both of them or have more than I can effectively use. knowledge & craft doesn't cost much to feed

This is what drives people, which you alluded to lacking in #3
Bloomberg reports Apple is working on a smart display and new Apple TV
I wish it was this easy. I wish there were short cuts.

1. I had a business partner once who has a wife that I do think highly of, and who made me ignore a million red flags. But at the end of the day he turned out to be the exact sc*mbag that any neutral observer would have said he is from day one. We separated and he tried hard take down the company with him, purely out of spite. Complete POS. Unfortunately will have to file the spouse-test under useless metric.

2. Nobody who's not been living under a rock for the last 30 years is gonna make this mistake in 2023.

3. Bad characters lie about a lot of things, including their childhood.

4. The only true test on this list.

5. As said in another answer, this is '60s psychobabble.

6. Unfortunately I myself haven't seen any reliable correlation between this and the true character of people.

7. The dumb bad characters get caught cheating. The smart ones will make sure to appear extremely correct about all the small stuff, just so you'd never suspect them of anything bad when it comes to the more important things in life.

8. Maybe that's true in some cases but you know who completely thrives in unexpected social situations: psychopaths. This is because all the normal people show some amount of insecurity and vulnerability in these kinds of scenarios and a skilled psychopath will leverage that to manipulate people.
> 1. who they marry: however the chemicals worked out some critically fateful days

If you marry someone based on "however the chemicals worked out some critically fateful days", that in fact tells me something about your judgment, and it isn't something good.
Would you rather they enlist as a cyberwarfare specialist or as a drone operator?
Twitter auctioned off office supplies, including a pizza oven and neon bird sign
Some(x? + y?)
> I'm definitely keen on suggestions for improvements I can make to the default UI.

Have you looked at other modern data-apps? AirTable? Notion? Jupyter Notebooks at least?

> Datasette provides both a JSON API (easily enabled for CORS access) and supports custom templates, so it's possible to customize the UI any way you like.

Seems promising. But how much does the JSON API support interactive work with data? The UI I've seen just reloaded the whole dataset it seems? There seems to be no way to specify queries and views from the UI. Would the API have means to manage such side-data?
Now port it to Emacs
Unless you want to spend the time doing RE of crypto (so fun!), how to do you even know who works for 1Password?

Are you waiting for Snowden 2.0 to explain how things work a decade later?
Pardon me asking, but what font (cipher? language?) are your tab titles and menus in? I don't recognize it, and I'm familiar with quite a few ciphers. (I initially thought it was another language, but it's clearly a transliteration of English.)
I think you're right, but I think it's unsurprising.

It's a bit like trusting an insurance broker's opinion on your own personal insurance necessity -- it'd be unsurprising to me for a broker to tell me that I need the most comprehensive (expensive) plan that they sell.
Photo hosting services been scanning md5 sums of a database of known criminal images for 20 years. They did that on telecom and isp's since 2000'ish. Google/Apple searched your cloud for mp3s or torrented movies also.

Now Apple just moved the search to the OS via an API call to its server, and people are noticing the traffic.

When I worked in telecom, if there was a hit on an image it was reported to legal. Legal contacted the feds. Feds contacted the local PD of the user. The PD would send a cop in to pick up a burned cd. The server would zip all the users data and burn onto a dvd. We wouldnt touch the dvd, the cop would walk into the datacenter and hit eject and collect the dvd. No chain of custody issues.
I personally use vaultwarden myself as well, and am also quite pleased with it.
Well it does nothing of course. Nothing at all.

Just like all the useless moral posturing on here (you know, as long as there is no personal cost involved beyond expressing an opinion).
I'm pretty sure legally it's pretty much settled, and i can continue this under a different name. Yeah the product is pretty simple yet interesting, something in it catches me and that's why i dumped immense labor into it. Having vast experience and being bored of conventional software jobs i can develop something like this easily

Basically at the current point it watches the video for you and breaks it down to all possible short clips you can extract from it, organises them into topics, speakers and chapters, plus the online editor to scale/crop/pad/caption/cc and export/distribute it. It is also a very flexible base to perform any kind of video-related editing/distribution tasks or projects whatsoever, elegantly overcoming all blockers such app could face with some real user load.
I would definitely seek to partner an experienced business person who might be interested in joining this, taking the responsibility of setting the business entity google can approve and stripe can send money to, as well as leading the way to sales, and while i can take it without getting fully broke, which is couple months, i think i will engage, so feel free to drop me an email if you wanna chat about this:)

You nicely noticed it is a great portfolio which could be studied as a robust minimal modular k8s node.js microservices infrastructure, or get me a high pay job right away, but after 7 years i'm so bored of this – i want to have something i really own and care after from ground up
I think you are looking too much into it. The point about cheating wasn't 'look for someone who never does anything wrong', but more like, if they think they can get away with something that benefits them in way that exposes a lack of integrity (cheating at a game for no stakes and not telling you about it) then you they probably are either:

1. Ego-driven (losses makes them mad) and/or

2. Cannot evaluate risk/reward properly (getting caught cheating significantly
hurts your reputation and you gain nothing from doing it in a friendly game) and/or

3. Are basically dishonest as a rule (untrustworthy)

The way I would handle that situation is not to mark down 'bad person' in my ledger, but to confront them 'hey, I saw you cheating back there, what was that about?' and see how they deal with it.

I don't see these as 'let's all judge everyone', because everyone would fail all of these bullet points. It is more like 'here are some things that can help you evaluate people'. Just like any hokey self-help guide, it is pretty much blatantly obvious stuff that we do anyway without thinking about it, but it can be helpful to be self-aware so that you can alter your own mechanisms.
This is another very good example of why EA games does not deserve your cash.
Kudos for the caveat that all advice is contextual
When I ran MySQL servers (which was many years ago), I ran a replication slave (or two) that didn't get query traffic; every so often, mysql would be shut down, the whole data directory would be tared and compressed, and then mysql would be started back up. IIRC, the interval was every 4 hours.

Normal production monitoring kept track that replication was working, but had to have an exception to allow more time between detection and alerting for the archiving.

These archives were used to start new production slaves, so the backups were tested from time to time. Older archives and careful use of binary logs could allow restoration to any particular point (although I never had to do that); at least within the retention of binary logs.

I did a rotation of backups to have the most recent X frequent backups, Y backups no more than 1 a day, Z weeklies, etc monthlys, etc, etc.