skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> but Troy is self-consciously not interested in handling subaddressing, which would improve his service

I don't think Troy is not interested in handling subadressing in the general sense, I think he just dismisses it as "not worth the time" given current statistics.

If it is worth the time and you were writing one of these "Pwned or Bot" "email credit score" detectors, it is easy: you could easily strip +whatever before an @ and check if that exists as well. (Check both!)

> which would improve his service

It's not actually his service he's talking about in this particular article. He doesn't run an explicit "Pwned or Bot" "email credit score" service. He's pointing out it is an interesting use of the HIBP API and also to do it right it needs some sort of value add/scoring system, which he hints at ways to do that but does not provide one (and especially not as a service).

HIBP itself doesn't support subaddressing as a feature, but that's on purpose for a different reason: many of the people that use subaddressing, especially consistent users, use HIBP to narrow down specific account threats and it is useful to them today that HIBP tracks all of their subaddresses independently.
This processor has the potential to run complex quantum computations well beyond the computational capability of any classical computer.

I don't think that manages expectations well, the word "potential" is doing a lot of work.
Hi! Retool on-prem user here ... is this going to be available for us too? Seems like we get everything fairly delayed which is a real bummer :/
I believe they made it so something lit up on the front when recording?
I kinda like it. It’s easier to read margined text.
"There was no evidence discovered that anyone emailed the draft opinion to anyone else, although technical limitations in the Court’s computer recordkeeping at the time made it impossible to rule out this possibility entirely."
Contracting has dried up; many businesses in town are gone; I've had it at least once; all my family has had it and some still dragging from it years later.
It has now passed review and is on the App Store. Obviously the Gruber effect will have helped resolve the situation.

https://mastodon.social/@icecubesapp@mastodon.cloud/10971756...

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/ice-cubes-for-mastodon/id64449...
Distributed tracing really ought to be built into every web application framework. What's the value in signing over your autonomy to a framework if it isn't going to handle cross-cutting concerns like forwarding correlation IDs from the inbound request to all outbound requests triggered by that request?
I don’t want to point out specific cultures. But that article is not the counter point you think it is:

To compensate for her homesickness, Ng decided to sell her own line of vegetarian imitation meats, and partnered with manufacturers in Taiwan to develop and import many of the dishes that she grew up with. In 1994, she opened up May Wah Vegetarian Market in New York City's Chinatown, and stocked it full with packets of imitation steak, spare ribs, shrimp, mutton, and grilled eel—all made some sort of combination of soy, seaweed, wheat gluten, or mushrooms.

It didn't land well. "Unfortunately it was not a good beginning for us. People were hesitant about trying these products," Lily says. "They wanted to stick to tofu and beans, and it was very hard for us to get people to try it. We ended up giving a lot of stuff away.

You can get the Chinese fake meat as snacks from your local Asian supermarket. I have Weilong brand fish tofu and barbeque gluten right now. These are meaty, but no where near as convincing as impossible meat. My fish tofu and barbeque gluten snacks have a fish cake like texture and are full of MSG. They appear to be vegan though.

We’re pointing to a culture that is used to a wide range of flavours and textures every day. They don’t needed that much convincing to try a not meat product, but it’s also easier to fake certain meat products. (Their existing fake meats are way cheaper than impossible meat though.)

But Impossible meat wasn’t designed for the Chinese. Or even Asians in general.
Someone sell them a modern status page!
There's also a feature request and proof-of-concept patch to implement persistent preferences for viewers who aren't logged in. The proof-of-concept already remembers whether the max width toggle is enabled: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T321498
What XML replaced was a combination of custom designed (often binary) formats and HTTP query-string like syntaxes. It is quite verbose compared to either of them, and explodes both your bandwidth and serialize/deserialize times, but it is arguably easier for your new co-worker to guess that the address line 2 goes in <address2>...</address2> rather than prefix tagged with 13, or worse yet at offset 42-61.

I got used to XML, tho I never could quite understand XSLT and the desire to program in it. I got used to json, but yaml I just can't bring myself to parse. YAML is 90% stuff you can't guess and just 10% data. And why so many?
There is a cylinder of restricted airspace that is activated beforehand
IIUC steps 5-7 in the exploit cause around 2^32 oopses. I don't know much about the Linux kernel - could it perhaps have a limit on the number of oopses before it halts the entire system?

The article explains why it is important to not do that in general, as an oops allows debugging and recovery etc. But 2^32 of them seems suspicious.
Here's one tiny example:
Want to link a static library that is also built from rust code? Yeah, you can make that work somehow by spawning another cargo from build.rs. Oh, you wanted to do that in a workspace? Ah no sorry, cargo is going to dead lock.
Is it me or does the person presenting look uncanny, almost like a 3D avatar?
Yet in the "real world" companies are rolling out huge amounts of Solar and Wind while new Nuclear is a rounding error.

Meanwhile armchair nuclear advocates keep saying this is impossible.
> the sheer scale of microbial life [...] ocean water

There's also the sheer predation of it. IIRC, for some coastal surface biome I've long forgotten, viral half-life was like an hour, and a third of bacteria were virally lysed each day. A cup of beach water is not just teaming with life, it's a war zone.
Honestly, I'm genuinely impressed. I even searched something that I would think would trip it up, "transgirl puppycore", and it managed to not only give several songs that are extremely on-point but likewise has a bunch of new and interesting music I never would have discovered otherwise.

I genuinely can see this being an extremely useful tool for content discovery; and I really hope the major players will implement your work.

Edit: A link to the playlist - https://open.spotify.com/playlist/03B6UoO679VGxQykFgpUSO?si=...
I believe they operate one of these in the microscope exhibit at SF Exploratorium. They're right on top of the bay (literally on a pier) and sample the water all the time, and IIRC, they put the samples into accessible high-end microscopes.
Federal debt "comes due" all the time. The option you haven't listed (which is the one we're engaged in) is: "You can choose to borrow more money to pay your creditors".

The interest on federal debt recently makes up (very roughly) 1/3 of our total deficit.

This is why when the US doesn't raise the "debt ceiling" we risk defaulting on our debts.
I think it's remarkable that one can't help but use language like 'designed' when referring to highly ordered and complex engineering marvels in nature but what they actually mean is that they believe this robust, highly ordered information management system was haphazardly built one bitflip at a time until we have the most successful organism in the known universe.

The further we push the boundaries of what we know about engineering, the more far fetched that paradigm becomes. I predict that mankind will see more successful breakthroughs when they start looking at organic systems through the lens of deliberate system design rather than spending so long kidding ourselves that it was all achieved by chance against impossible odds.
Based on what you wrote, it doesn't sound like you have confidence in your potential cofounder or the value they might bring to the table. I think this partnership is not likely to work out - not because of the CEO's deficiencies (however real they might be), but because you're starting out a very critical relationship with an adversarial attitude.

Secondly, while a CTO should indeed be very technically involved at the early stages, it is a business role at the end of the day. Your goal is to build a healthy business, not code up the cleanest architecture or deliver the most beautiful product (though you'll probably need to do these as well). As a cofounder, you will be dealing with customers, with risk mitigation, with all sorts of things that are only tangentially related to technology. This attitude of "value comes from software" is something I see often from engineers, who miss the fact that code is a means to an end. There is a lot more to a successful business than writing code. To answer your question, I do think that you're likely to encounter friction with other senior/executive leadership as long as that is your worldview.

Might be worth reading The Founder's Dilemmas by Noam Wasserman. He covers the topic of cofounding with others, and also talks about optimizing for control vs money (spoiler, if you go for the former, you will likely have a lot less of the latter).
It's hyperbole and mocking AWS. The tweet chain starts at https://twitter.com/QuinnyPig/status/1173367909369802752 (rolled up https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1173367909369802752.html though sometimes the replies to the posts are amusing too) and should be taken with sufficient salt to concern a doctor.

Though, I wouldn't be surprised that if overall, people have spent more time on compute than have made from the models. There are companies that treat data science properly and are doing it well - but in the previous financial era people were inclined to throw money at things without clear criteria for success.
If you build it, they will come...

Most of the time, technology that is leading edge is only there for a short period, as its either bought out or lacks funding. With IBM, they have the funds to start revolutions, and have a larger vision at play. However, quantum computing is not a widely accepted concept due to a lot of its complexities, which is likely why its such a niche area. Given time and money, which IBM can handle, something will happen.
Very cool work, good luck, hope you land a good job.

I put in "Women Jazz Singers"
Not bad, a bit heavy on Nina Simone and had Marvin Gaye, who was great but a dude.
Nit picking really. Nice work :)
Assuming the fines are high enough to motivate change.
This is a tale as old as software itself.

Some of the hyperbole in yesterday's thread decrying the redesign was laughable.
‘How long before a body starts to smell’: A list of Walshe’s Google searches
I asked for a playlist of "how ADHD sounded like" and I can't be more impressed.

I don't have ADHD myself but live with people that do and I think the playlist really captured some of the observed symptoms of the disorder in a musical way.

But what I really found impressive is: searching for "ADHD playlists" in Spotify yields a lot of playlists with lo-fi music for deep focus, not the fast-paced, disorganized, hyperactive songs I got in the generated playlist. That means, the model is capable of discerning what the word "ADHD" means in a profound way, it's not just regurgitating songs that resemble "Spotify playlists with ADHD in their title". Very, very impressive.

For the curious: https://open.spotify.com/playlist/3MSryXJ6F1n34JSIPe1iMA?si=...
It is a bit funny that people have come to call Video-See-Through (VST) devices MixedReality (MR) and Optical-See-Through (OST) devices AugmentedReality (AR) when Microsoft introduced the term MixedReality for Hololens only to differentiate their Hololens (which is Optical-See-Through) from other AR devices.
I don't know about network automation much. Is NAPALM still a thing, is it viable?
I'm still only using old.reddit and i.reddit.com years after their re-design. The moment they get rid of those I'll probably stop using reddit completely.
You aren’t wrong, but people have very different mindsets.

People play the lotto for fun. They think hey maybe I’ll get lucky and win. Sure there are addicts , but I don’t think default behavior is “if I play this I’ll be rich “

Crypto is literally “if I trade this I’ll get rich”.

But, both are roughly 0 sum games in the end as you rightly pointed out.
this link is from a (at least in the past) very active person on various IRC Linux and programming help channels who wrote the wiki article at least fifteen years ago.

make that sixteen years ago: http://mywiki.wooledge.org/XyProblem?action=info
I love the new Wikipedia but the Reddit redesign is an attrocity. I still use the old site with RES.
aka fake economy.
The cost of adjusting is a one time expense, whereas the objective benefits offered by a good redesign continue to provide new value for as long as the new design is in use.

I see your argument as one against frequent redesigns, not one against redesigns in general. If you change up your UI every 12 months, even if each iteration is technically better, you are causing problems for your users. Wikipedia's last redesign happened 12 years ago.
OK sure; same's true of bonds or CDs or any other asset type though no? The point is that "invest in equities with dividend reinvestment until retirement and then buy a life annuity" is a totally viable strategy. That's basically the way pension saving in the UK works historically, for example.
Are you basically reselling hosted https://github.com/coder/code-server?
> “After almost a decade, the program has not grown to create the impact that we had originally hoped. With so many eligible organizations — more than 1 million globally — our ability to have an impact was often spread too thin,” the company wrote.

SO WHAT!? Any money is helpful. This is such a BS argument for getting rid of it.
Not entirely, most services require some products as inputs, so they are still measured in some way.
We've done nothing, and we're all out of options, confused pikachu face. Though, personally I think this leak probably was good as it at least got public discourse going around the subject even though the justices ultimately went against public sentiment for reasons.

I'm personally WAY more concerned about Justice Thomas and Ginny Thomas and their links to the insurrection attempt, and other undermining of democracy.
So much practice around secrets and identity is oriented around assuming secrets are expensive. Like, people will set up a database and create ‘the database user’, with its one password which now needs to be used by all the systems that access that database.

To maximize security you need to treat secrets as being cheap. In fact they need to be disposable.

In theory any time a system needs access to that database you could have a process that creates an entirely new user just for that session, with a random password - and, bonus, only the permissions that that particular client needs.

If that secret gets compromised, no biggie - you can destroy that user account and the credential will never work again.

Secret rotation is a related approach, but again - if your rotation frequency is ‘quarterly’ rather than ‘hourly’, is there a good reason for that, or have you again just assumed secrets are expensive?
Gut feelings, what else matters?
> From a climate perspective, we’d be better to bury the stuff in the ground than to burn it.

Actually from a climate perspective we'd be better off burning the plastic, and reducing how much fresh oil we pump.

I'd rather "bury" if you will, the oil, instead of the plastic.
How long do I need to wait?
One of the missing pieces IMO is that your language needs the right kind of shorthand to make it easy to say "I'm calling things that return Options or Results, I myself return an Option or Result, any time I unwrap let's pipeline any null values or failures into returning a failure immediately."

In Rust this is the ? operator: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/operator-exp...

The whole idea is that there should never be a way to call unwrap() if you as the caller cannot handle it gracefully. And if you do this at every step up until the UI layer, which can handle any failure as an error to be displayed in the UI, then the job is complete!
Summarizing:

* Hastings: Co-CEO/Chairman => Executive Chairman

* Ted Sarandos: Co-CEO + board member => Co-CEO + board member

* Greg Peters: COO => Co-CEO + board member

[1]: https://about.netflix.com/en/news/ted-sarandos-greg-peters-c...
I think a lot of folks in this thread are forgetting the first day they spent using git. It's kind of like asking why someone would create a text editor in a world where vim exists, since vim can already do everything you need. Sure, but it takes months to become proficient with and years to master.

Years ago I worked at a company that had a team of front end developers that used Dropbox for version control instead of git. Conflicts were prevented by the default "this file has changed on disk, are you sure you want to save?" warning in their IDEs. It worked incredibly well for that team, and they never suffered a single gitastrophe.
Ha ha, yeah no I would never force a cast, I always unwrap optionals...

As an example, I was slow to adopt guard statements generally, preferring to strictly use them only for parameter checking (thus only at the top of functions).

Then there are crazy ways that case statements can be used in a switch that I still don't understand.
Most people won't bother to figure out how they can change it, if it occurs to them that it'd be possible at all.

Most of Wikipedia's users don't know anything about how to use the MediaWiki software (aside from searching and browsing articles) nor are they tech nerds. They won't change it even if they do prefer the old one.
There is so much about Awk that just seems more modern than Perl, which largely replaced Awk in common usage in the mid 1990s. Maybe the similarity to Javascript (which as others have mentioned isn't coincidental) will encourage younger people to take a look at it.
Thankfully this isolated flaw was quite easy to fix. And yes this code isn't likely to be on any hot paths, and code can always stand to have bounds/sanity checks (and it always should). But unfortunately encapsulating all non-hot-paths in Linux kernel that might have these sorts of bugs in a memory-safe language is at best a very long term goal and at worst a pipe-dream. The real goal of the blog post was not to push for any sort of rewrite, but rather to note how even the simplest and most innocuous of bugs can lead to security-relevant primitives. And also to make sure kernel developers and bug fixers have strategies like this in mind when they evaluate other bugs in the future.

TLDR: However honorable the end-goal is, this blog post is not the ammo you need to push for a big rewrite of various kernel<->userland interfaces into memory safe languages.
Which client did you end up on? The list is somewhat overwhelming.
An Analysis of the Trial by Franz Kafka
Love the idea!!!!!

Tried a few softballs, not sure how accurate it is. Example: "Extremely popular pop rock from the early 1990s." [0] It's good music but I wouldn't say those were extremely popular in the 90s.
Again, great work and I'll check it out for more obscure searches based on feeling rather than objective information.

[0] https://open.spotify.com/playlist/4ALBHGIxhsspN793KXZq9k?go=...
At least this is an improvement from the “hacker known as 4chan” days. I’m a bit confused by this report though, did they do forensic analysis on the devices of all employees who would’ve had access or only some and rely on interviews for the rest?

I imagine if someone leaked it they probably wouldn’t immediately admit to it just when asked.
I didn't turn on JS for the form to be shown, either.
Because no PR opportunity for Amazon. But I agree, it's a feeble dishonest excuse. Better to simply say "Because we're cutting costs", instead of weeping how it failed to set the world on fire with glowing PR for their munificence.

Personally I try hard to avoid sending my business to Amazon whenever there's an alternative, and this was one of the good things about them.
Try `find / -iname "foo" 2>/dev/null`, works every time. Also can take quite some time.
Well, this stinks. For a point of reference, I had it activated for about 2 years and directed the donations to Federation of American Scientists - not a huge name in the nonprofit space, but well-established and well-respected. According to the impact page, my orders during that time (including some big ticket stuff, about half the parts for a high-spec gaming PC) generated a grand total of $35.22, and FAS has received $1,150 during their participation in the program. I’m glad I could help pay for what’s probably less than one month of their hosting costs…

It was something of a psychological hook for me, that a few pennies from each order would go to support content I appreciated. I did mentally kick myself when I forgot to place an order through the smile.amazon.com portal. I’ll probably end up giving a bit more consideration to other online retailers now, although every time I’ve ordered online from Walmart lately has been a complete disaster.
When I was a kid, my school took us the boston science museum and I wandered off to the microscope exhibit. The museum collected and displayed a bunch of things from Boston Bay, and looking in- as a kid learning about computers- it seemed like some of the "animacules" behaved in complex ways- like a computer program with sensor input and mechanical actuators. Some would spiral endlessly while others would zip forward, then back, then turn and zip forward again. I decided then and there I would figure out how these things worked, applying my hacker knowledge of computers.

That led to a career in biology although I don't think I really used microscopes much at all over the next 30 years. Recently I adjusted my hobbies and built a microscope from components and use it to apply object detection to tardigrades. Guess what- the state of the art is to collect enormous numbers of images of a microbiotic organism and cluster them into a small number of states (like a markov model) and estimate the transitions between them. I don't even want to solve any specific problem- I just love watching tardigrades. They're hilarious little animacules.
No, that's pretty much what I was looking for.

I'm going to pretend I didn't see the XML example but I think I could produce CSV files with this.

Thanks!
That's not what the XY problem is. The XY problem is asking for Y because you think it's the only way to solve your actual problem X. It's more of a lack of perspective than a lack of education. You tunnel-vision on what you think the solution will be, and when you go looking for help you you ask only about Y, instead of providing the larger context of X.

You can't have an XY problem unless you're trying to solve problem X. It's not a lack of education, it's a lack of perspective on what your real goal is.
Unfortunately not all web frameworks do this automatically. In addition sometimes you may want to propagate ID over non http connections like database drivers or even message queues.
That's the Y-X problem...
The compile time allocated array is to avoid allocations at run time, if that is a requirement. In a language with proper macros such as Nim or Lisp this can be done at compile time using exactly your approach. That way it executes fast and is just as simple .
I was hoping for some clever abuse of AWK's patterns & regexes but clean code will also do :)