skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are plenty of examples that already run on simulators. One example would be QAOA that can be used to solve combinational problems like MQO.

Then there is also research that compares the performance of classical ML algorithms to Quantum Based variants, not only simulated but on real, IBM quantum hardware. Not only does the quantum equivalent outperform it (in pure terms of accuracy, as time to train cannot yet be compared), but also in complexity - iirc ~67k parameters for a NN and 16 for a QNN.

This is not to say that it is all set in stone - its still highly unclear which approach and design is the best for what when it comes to quantum circuits.

There is also a problem that noise suppression and error correction need even bigger quantum computers, so we‘re still a way off.

In the words of a Roche ML/Research presentation, who also already tried QC: They tried it and it didnt offer the expected results due to hardware limitations. But they are still actively pursuing it, because in terms of QC you have to be prepared, as otherwise you might be playing an endless catching up with those who were ready.
But not my iPad, for some reason. That's a that an omission that baffles me.
In the end, most history is < 100% certified factual, and > 0% anecdote. The rigor we should expect, and the skepticism we should employ, should scale with the importance of the historical "fact", and this is a pretty trivial, unimportant fact.
The Russian article about the movie in Wikipedia says that the movie was not banned. It was originally meant for limited "club" distribution because it was obtained as a war trophy from Germany and run in English with subtitles. That year (1948) there were other 26 such trophy movies mostly of Germany and USA production, incl. e.g. "Stagecoach".
A similar thing thing happened in 1962, during the Cuban missile crisis.[0]

The math is sobering. Even if we assume 'only' a 1% chance per year, that implies a 63% probability per century.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasily_Arkhipov
Great to see open standards services switching to open source software.
Back in those days conferences weren't filmed.

https://www.usenix.org/blog/vault-steve-jobs-keynotes-1987-u...

Here are some references,

Chris MacAskill did a full overview of what he had to do to convince Job, it was even commented here,

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17420674

Now gone from the Internet,

https://allaboutstevejobs.com/blog/2018-07-11-chris-macaskil...

However it is saved on the Wayback machine,

https://web.archive.org/web/20180628214613/https://www.cake....

=> "They said a Unix weenie was code for software engineers who hated what we were doing to Unix (the operating system we licensed)—putting a graphical user interface on it to dumb it down for grandmothers. They heckled Steve about his efforts to destroy it. His nightmare would be to speak to a crowd of them."

There is also the interview with UNIX Today!

https://www.tech-insider.org/unix/research/1991/11.html

=> "You know, take SGI's new machines-they have 8-bit color frame buffers in them, you can't even put up a bunch of beautiful color photographs without having one of them look good. The rest of them look blah because you can't do it in 8 bits. You know what I'm talking about. So most computers haven't even gotten past the stage where you could put up a bunch of color photographs, much less other types of media, or moving, dynamic media. And I think that that's an advantage that we'll continue to keep. "

=> "We're bringing Unix to the commercial market where what they care about is designing, creating and deploying mission-critical custom apps alongside those in a multitasking environment. They want to be able to use a suite of productivity apps that are compatible in the data formats with all the ones they use in the PCs. And that's where we have an offering that Motif has nothing to compete with and Sun has very little to compete with. But if you take us into the traditional scientific and engineering marketplace, we are a pretty powerful and very cost-effective Unix box. And to address X, we do run X on our product very well. There are two: one X product, soon to be two, that you can buy from third parties that run X-Window right alongside their Next Step windows, and they're quite good. So we don't have anything against X for what it was designed for, but X has not made the crossover into the commercial marketplace. "

Plenty of other similar remarks on the interview.

And some interesting NeXT footage,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRBIH0CA7ZU
Its all about the money. Can you name a single company that is proofable totally honest when it comes to describing its own failings?
FAA Says Outage Was Mistakenly Caused by Contractors
Subtitle:

The workers “unintentionally deleted files” on the alert system for pilots, causing thousands of flights to be delayed on Jan. 11, just weeks after another nationwide air travel failure.
Huh, there is less difference between D-segment (3-series, A4, C-class) and E-segment (5-series, A6, E-class) cars than I thought.
https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2023-22809
HDR support is prettu important for gaming. Win11 has Auto HDR to convert SDR content too.
You might also mess with your loss function to force it to "make up its mind" as right now the blurry mess likely minimizes the error from the actual frame (which isn't really want you want).
A rational person would immediately report it whether the blackmail was true or not. The penalty for revealing secrets is worse than about any crime except a few high level drug dealing or crimes involving death. If you get fired because you didn't admit to eating a scary mushroom or whatever so be it, the alternative is much worse.
This is only a 1.5b parameter model. This is in line with that. GPT3.5 is ~175b params.
Whats wrong with that person?
Fortunately the browser has the option to disable cookies. I've never understood why people just don't use this option.
That’s strange to me. I moved over from Spotify and expected QOL degradation that didn’t happen.

Sound quality is better, artist are getting pay more and I have more music available(Joanna newsom, skeemask)
Two comments from a quick look:

1) I recall a comment a while back from the xdelta author about how most history tools store a sequence of changes from nothing (as it sounds like yours does), but this isn't ideal since usually you want a recent version which then needs to be produced from the potentially long sequence of changes. Caching various revisions could help in your case but that is less than ideal when the files are large.

2) It isn't clear how you go from live editing type thing to revision control. If you haven't yet, you might want to look at the Aegis paper[1] (it is short) for a quick overview of the framework it used to form a revision control system from a collection of more specific tools that could be customized. That type of framework might go well with your rapid branch synchronization. Sadly the author, Peter Miller[2], died in 2014. As far as I know no one picked up development (it isn't the easiest name to search for :/). The User Guide [3] from the documentation page [4] gives a bit more info about the model.

[1] https://aegis.sourceforge.net/auug93.pdf

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Miller_(software_enginee...

[3] https://aegis.sourceforge.net/user-guide.pdf

[4] https://aegis.sourceforge.net/documents.html
Vanity. Having lost significant body fat mid way through high school, I could not stand the idea of consuming a drug whose side effects included “the munchies”.
> In the entirety of George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, I haven't noticed a single car or truck in the streets of Oceania. Sure, Winston takes the train once or twice, but no cars? I would have thought the generally envisioned future of the 40's included car-ridden roads. Was this novel even more ahead of its time than I thought?

I think O'Brien says every member of the inner party has either a car or a helicopter. It's also stated that Oceania has a deliberate policy of discouraging technological advancement, except in the fields of military arms and mind control.

The "generally envisioned future[s] of the 40's," were optimistic, 1984 is an extremely pessimistic dystopia. Once down to deliberately engineer grinding poverty for its population.
My sincere hope for my family is that weather patterns are 'nice' and we survive without significant fallout exposure. It's not as unlikely as it sounds, depending on where you are when the bombs fall.

Beyond that things will not really be that bad. Society maintains continuity even through insane events like the black death or cities being bombed into ruins. I think this is because humans are socialized for a very long time, and have very little experience living through apocalypses, and have a hard time accepting the inevitability of their own deaths. Society doesn't break down during mass starvation even.

Speaking of mass starvation and lack of clean water, that will be how most people who survive about 3 days post nuclear war will die. This is easily avoidable, water filtration/sanitization solutions are extremely cheap, or even free if you have a bucket and some sand. Storing 1 year of calories takes so little space and is so cheap it isn't even a consideration.

Mass starvation will not be a problem in the long run because it will be a huge problem much sooner. People will starve in the 2 months post event because of the temporary breakdown in logistics. After 6 months trains will be running again and there will be plenty of food, and no cities full of people to eat it.
Or even better; by federal law, cancel all bonuses, stock buyback and dividend for 3 years, for any company that leaked data about any person, anywhere in the world trough a data breach. And fine them accordingly, so the saved money don't just pile up for a late pack-back 3 years later.

That should fix the problem.
Very cool! I would definitely order, but unfortunately shipping to my country costs twice as much as the actual microscope.
Oh hell yeah, I turned off my dark mode extension, much better now. Thanks!
A great deal of government positions involve carrying a gun. Having a gun and being a pot user is a felony with 10+ years in jail. It's one of the most serious non-violent offenses for mere personal use possession on the books.

It's also very easy to detect because pot stays in your system longer than about any other drug and the penalty for pot use by non-firearm owners is so weak and unenforced that people often forget it is a very severe crime for the ~40% of US that owns arms. People mistakenly get nonchalant about it.
There’s also a reasonably large set of people who do so because they have a significant trust fund or large inheritance coming so they can basically do whatever they like and the money doesn’t really matter. Don’t necessarily feel sorry for them!
Since no one has actually attempted to answer your question yet I'll give my guess as to why: I think Apple generally invested way too little time and developer talent into the development of Apple Music. I think this is evident in many ways when you look at the Music apps, _especially_ the macOS one. Since the initial release of Apple Music very little has happened to the apps, leading me to the conclusion that they're not spending time to improve them either.

Recall that Apple bought Beats to acquire the music streaming platform that Beats was developing with the purpose of turning it into Apple Music. To me this always seemed like a bit of a weird move since Apple could obviously build their own music streaming service without acquiring a company to do so. My guess is that someone at Apple who's more of a business person than a product person wanted Apple to have a Spotify competitor ASAP and saw the acquisition of Beats as a quick way to get there (with means that a business person can carry out: acquisitions). The acquisition happened, Beat's tech was turned into Apple Music (probably with time to market as the key metric that management cared about), Apple Music was released. Then the business person was happy, called it a day, and moved on.

Had Apple put their own focus and top talent into Apple Music the way they did with iTunes and iTunes Store back when iPod was their main cash cow, then I think Apple Music would have been very different. But alas, "music streaming" is probably just a check mark in someones list of services that Apple should have, and it's already checked so the job is done :)
One thing it's missing that would be immensely useful is a leg room comparison in front / back seats
Disassembling Rewind.ai
I like it for scripting shell but not for daily interactive shell.
Arguably, a lot of early radicalization happen because folks are open to accepting viewpoints and things they know nothing about, more and more toward extreme.
Why is the discomfort of it not being called it (morally >) than the discomfort of someone who finds it demeaning to use it on people.
The post title is inaccurate. The linked repo makes no mention at all of Datadog. And as far as I can tell, it doesn't position itself as a Datadog competitor either.
What?
How much work do you think it is to run a HTTP server that serves static content in a datacenter? I've ran moderately popular websites before and it's zero work most of the time.

In 2005, Wikipedia ran on $5000 with one employee and over a billion views just fine. People did, in fact, contribute to it despite money not being thrown into mud.

> And if you disagree with that, then where are all the top 1000 websites that are run by "a few" people?

Where are all the static HTTP websites that are ran by dozens of people? At most SaaS companies, keeping the lights on for the HTTP server is the least work you do.

Your view of the world seems strongly distorted by zealous belief in FAANG overstaffing.
Sadly all models are licensed for non-commercial use only (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), so not Free Software.
Musk is actually making HN and Reddit worse because people cannot stop talking about him.

At some point, you have to ask yourself if it's worth typing out and posting something that would be ChatGPT's response to "write a Hacker News comment decrying Elon Musk".

As a pretty avid Twitter user, I'm still enjoying it.
Nicotine isn't good for you by any means, but lung cancer is the main reason cigarettes are uniquely harmful. It's a really rough way to go.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34446673
But why? There's nothing special about having 4 storage elements. If you want 54 values then 6 bits are going to be just as effective as 4 trits, and easier to implement in every way.
Hand washing records were not kept for the same reason I've mentioned multiple times - nobody ever thought it relevant, so it wasn't considered relevant. So it's not like you can simply search the records for something which does not exist! Even when one doctor finally did discover the value of handwashing, through a remarkable degree of serendipity, his hypothesis, based on anecdotal evidence, was rejected because it did not line up with scientific thought of the time. He ended up in an insane asylum and died. Like a Greek tragedy, his cause of death was an infected wound on his hand, very possibly caused by excessive washing! [1]

So now we return to the same question. How do you expect a machine to simply discover the value of hand washing? Let alone carry out tests? You have no data on hand washing whatsoever as it's not seen as relevant. It's a rather random hypothesis that, given the knowledge of the time, would have less than zero basis for support. There is no logical reason for its discovery, nor ought it ever be prioritized highly in any way whatsoever.

And this is, in many ways, the rule more than the exception for discovery.

[1] - https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/handwashi...

----

On the numbers issue. I was not referring to "views" but facts. The tribesmen had terms only for 1, 2, and many. And while the article doesn't mention it, it's safe to assume they have 0 systems of mathematics. Assuming they are not uniquely retarded, we were all in a similarly limited state of understanding at some point. Searching for where we are, from the state of where they are, will yield no results. Yet somehow, we achieved it.
Probably deny you entry?
(I’m in the uk) Anything medical history related comes in a letter, the letter gets hole punched and goes in an A4 binder at the front.

It means that I have a complete chronological record, but god help me if I have to find something specific.

This solution was chosen because the only reason I’d need to go back through it all would be an exceptional one, and it hasn’t happened yet, so I optimised for minimum time to file the record rather than retrieve.
Not necessarily. Apple can make a specific deal with Google that go beyond the general terms of service of the App Store. This applies to any pair of other companies and any service owned by one of them. It's not different from an AGPL project offering commercial licenses for using the source code in a proprietary way.

Furthermore there are some apps that Apple can't do without to be able to sell their devices IMHO. Examples: Gmail, video streaming services, banking. If any of those apps from well entrenched incumbents won't like to play by the rules I think that Apple has to make a special deal with them or risk losing sales to Android competitors.

Smaller companies don't have any leverage.
you could just try to use it, first. google an example script, or look how to do it on youtube.

example python script using chatgpt

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=example+python+...

mix in 30 min/day of the top half of this course, 'Python for Everybody'.

https://www.freecodecamp.org/learn/scientific-computing-with...

happy destroying.
For some reason this reminds me of the video games that taught me to aim RPGs with iron sights by memorizing the dimensions of in game vehicles and comparing it to a little measure on the sight to estimate distance and so how far to adjust the aim upwards..
> For anyone who is curious what means, it means they must have 1311 cars in the database.

They do, the list is available here https://www.carsized.com/en/cars/.
A quick pipe of this list into wc -l gives you 1311.
It’s not like, thetans. It may not be reliable, but it’s not pseudoscience.

From Wikipedia:

>In 2002, a review by the National Research Council found that, in populations "untrained in countermeasures, specific-incident polygraph tests can discriminate lying from truth telling at rates well above chance, though well below perfection". The review also warns against generalization from these findings to justify the use of polygraphs—"polygraph accuracy for screening purposes is almost certainly lower than what can be achieved by specific-incident polygraph tests in the field"—and notes some examinees may be able to take countermeasures to produce deceptive results
If it asks for it.
The irony here is people will probably use it like nothing happened.
That sounds like a variation on "In France, even the poor speak French". It was likely more of a quip than an official statement of policy-making procedures.
I don’t daily it but I use it from time to time.
And it is still (by a mile) the best advice you can give someone who (1) doesn't rely on the money in the short term and (2) doesn't want to spend mental capacity on managing his money.

The only difference i'd suggest for people who want to spend 1% more mental capacity is to mix their ETF up so they have global and other-assets exposure.

People like to feel in control, like to gamble, like to be clever, like to know a secret trick. But they are just lying to themselves.

No matter the macroeconomical circumstances, there's no magical risk/return profile that will beat stocks until there's a significant paradigm shift (and no, a minor recession after a period of weird monetary policies isn't it)
How often does someone need to buy new handguns?
Also, what's up with the terrible commit messages? That alone makes me doubt the quality of this project.

> fix

> fix lint

> fix lint,

> fix lint.

> fix docker file

> fix bug

> fix docker-compose

Is your software test process so poor that you can't even ensure a single commit passes all checks? This almost feels like developers are pushing whatever they want with no QA, and if it breaks the build, just push up more commits until checks pass??
I was going on to make a comment about how many firms that have IPO'd of late are never been profitable. These firms have not paid any dividends and may never. Yet these firms are hyped up to lure in the retail investor, yet the evidence presented in this paper is that compound growth of dividends is the route to wealth.
If it's a few minutes per token you might be waiting a lot longer for a full response: https://blog.quickchat.ai/post/tokens-entropy-question/

I also wonder how open.ai etc provides access to these for free. Reminds me of the adage from when Facebook rose to popularity: "if something is free, 'you' are the product". Perhaps to gather lots more conversational training data for fine tuning.
From what little I already read, it seems interesting and mostly translateble to modern lessons. Will pin to read later.
But on the other end The Netherlands are providing new legislation to enable parties to enter the gambling industry. Albeit with restrictions they are literally making the impossible possible with his new move. Licenses for new online casinos have been handed out the last year.

To be honest, this really hurts my heart, i have several friends with gambling addictions and recently lived in Australia where the gambling industry have free reigns and seeing all the advertising and the fact that every bar has a gambling section is against what we should want as human species.

In Australia you'll see big casino ads next to government ads advertising help lines for gambling addictions.
I agree with you in that money and power corrupt. I think some people want to believe it just “reveals character” as a defence mechanism, as in, that could never happen to them, they’re a good person, and they’d still be good even with wealth. If it happened to Elon Musk then he must’ve been bad from the start.

But:

> if people are able to operate largely without consequence, then they might act in antisocial ways - like musk, in this particular example

Not trying to defend the guy, but come on - he bought a company, took it private, and he is now free to ruin it as he sees fit. That’s not antisocial behaviour. He’s just making the decisions he thinks are best for Twitter (even if I disagree with them).

And we have to consider the fact that when a celebrity does something, it is blown to a much bigger proportion by the media. Some random small business owner blocking third parties? Nobody cares, most apps aren’t even that open to begin with. Elon Musk does it? “What an antisocial monster corrupted by power and money”

Meanwhile, murderers face real consequences for their behaviour, and you see it happening anyway, so your thesis that bad behaviour only happens because people are unaccountable is demonstrably false.
They can distinguish you based on some fingerprinting and, most importantly, browsing behavior. That's what FLoC was about - with enough data, you don't need third party cookies to recognise a user.
From guide linked above:

> It is remarkable that such large multi-lingual model is openly available for everybody.

Am I the only one thinking that this remark is a insight into societal failure? The model has been trained on global freely available content, anyone who has published on the Web has contributed.

Yet the wisdom gained from our collective knowledge is assumed to be withheld from us. As the original remark was one of surprise, the authors (and our) assumption is that trained models are expected to be kept from us.
(2018)

Also, worth watching Attenborough's "A Life On Our Planet" released on Netflix a few years ago. It gives an overview of the threats earth faces in the next couple decades, and a testimony of the changes he's already witnessed.