skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I believe the answer is there when she complaints about the moderator. Probably she asked that someone was censored and didn't have her way. Now call me a white supremacist, but I tend to trust dang slightly more than someone that says that I'm bad without having met me.
Fun to play with, good job! I wonder if the exact opposite exist: give it a playlist, and it'll give you some kind of description for it. I always have a hard time answering "What kind of music do you listen to?", maybe AI could help.
> Or for the users of those apps

Is this the sound of nails hammering into Twitter Blue's coffin? An obvious premium feature would have been API tokens.
Sick and tired of these big organizations leaking sensitive data. They need to be held accountable. 20k per customer per incident.
The Baseball Game That Turned into a Battle Royale [video]
Isn't the point that you have to have showdead on to see that stuff, though? Most sites/communities don't let you read what got removed. In fact, every time I see a comment of that nature that's not dead, I don't manage to get done typing a rebuttal before it's been killed.
>And Randy Komisar, a general partner at venture capital firm KPCB, gave a book of erotic poetry to another partner at the firm, and accepted a board seat (and the credit for a successful IPO) at RPX that would ordinarily have gone to her.

You don't mind revealing who "her" is, don't you?
They often issue certificates outside their own domains, for example they use them on middleware applications. It’s very common in large organisations.
This post [0] is a good primer and they are talking about a 20b model gpt3 has 175b. Their other posts go more into details but yes, it really is a massive operation.

Some hard facts from here [1] talking about BLOOM with 175b parameters..

>> Installing the full 175B version is a challenge though as it requires around 350GB of GPU VRAM, which is not something one can easily afford.

But hey why deploy a model like chatGPT at all when you guys can be confidently incorrect all by yourselves.

[0] https://nlpcloud.com/deploying-gpt-neox-20-production-focus-...

[1] https://nlpcloud.com/chatgpt-open-source-alternatives.html
Good point. A "parse, don't validate" approach to handling the contents of `$EDITOR` would look like `parseEditorEnv :: String -> Maybe ProgramPath`, and that parse should fail.
> correct path has always been adversarial interoperability

Ceding users' screens doesn't work with an ad-based business model.
You can pass context in as another input, so encoder->decoder cross attention models. People are working on data storage and retrieval as well with transformers (so you would query out to load in different attention vectors).

So you can just view that as a memory bank with paging. You do however need to teach the network the task you want to solve. So you'd have to train it on the math part.
That's a finer point, sure, but I don't think anybody operates under the pretense that (1) Google is not an advertising and analytics company, or that (2) Google willfully introduces malware to end user devices (even if their actual software could be reasonably characterized as adware or spyware).
Sure, see the 'Casualties and losses' section.

I was wrong a bit, the number includes Russian volunteer fighters and with covert Russian military is estimated to be about 14400.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Donbas_(2014%E2%80%9320...
Turkish did that. In my childhood bread was 200.000 liras for example.

About a decade ago they renominated it. "New Turkish Lira" was born, where 1.000.000 Old Lira = 1 Lira.

So as another comment has mentioned, probably that would happen.
I’m not sure I agree that cmake is declarative.. look at complex builds with it and it looks a lot more like a badly designed scripting language with global state everywhere
> Do you have a source on your assumption of costs and benefits

We know Twitter is careening towards bankruptcy under his management. There are other factors at play. But the buck stops with him, and the buck is getting fucked.
Bill seeks to ban investors from China, Russia, Iran, NK from buying Texas land
Thanks for catching! This is a legit issue with our list view and we are looking into a fix at the moment :)
Hm -- don't think this is the case for legacy industries. It's just what they're used to and have been doing for years
Sure, but likely that team is not working on a single service when people say microservices. That could be SOA, which is more my preference, but definitely not a microservice going by the most popular definition which is "small enough to rewrite."

> BTW, monolith DB has its own form of eventual consistency.

Sure, on very large systems. Microservices always have this - even tiny systems.

> It gives you a smaller blast radius when something goes wrong,

At the cost of often having a much harder time fixing things when they do go wrong :)

> avoids over-stressing a single DB,

Monoliths can use as many databases as they want! And you can use a single DB with a microservice architecture across many microservices (tho I think this is an anti-pattern, teams often do it).

> alleviates single points of human dependency like the DB curator,

I haven't been at a job that has a DB curator, but it compounds the "bob wrote those ten services in rust, who... who knows rust? anyone?" issues :)

> lets you scale separate pieces independently,

You can do this with a monolith with many technologies, though seems easier to do for a microservice as a general rule. But, you have to need that scale first!

> and yes forces you to silo the data. There are several good reasons larger orgs have been doing things this way for a long time.

Plenty of larger orgs also avoid microservices!
I don't think that's what's happening. sudoedit does NOT run the editor as root, it copies the file to a temporary as root, runs the editor as you, and copies the temporary over the target file as root when you're done editing it (at least it's supposed to).
The Grapes of Wrath’s Foreshadowing of the Cold War (2018)
I don't think it's a matter of people simply understanding what I meant to say, it's grammatically correct from what I have gathered.
"They" is animate common. "It" is inanimate. To the extent that English has grammatical gender, they're different.
You might want to take a look at the active debate and court rulings [1] over the First Amendment and public access TV, which is probably the best analogy to the internet we can think about with modern technology.

It's more complex than it seems.

[1] https://www.commlawblog.com/2019/06/articles/broadcast/supre...
That is correct, probably just a few percent. But the language here is making it sound like they are not purchased at all by individuals or family offices, and that is not true.
As a nontechnical person who enjoys this stuff, also wasn't familiar. Anyone have a good rec for a starter guide for a nontechnical person to be able to do similar research (albeit in ideally more of a white hat approach)?
Corporate donations are a poor replacement for tax based programs. I don't want to decry Gates and co, I'd rather the money was spent than not, but if you move away from "charity as a business" to not for profit programs seeking funding, they welcome corporate money mainly because it brings freedoms, where government programs generally come with strings. The US government was absolutely overt that US aid was an arc of US foreign policy and this meant that when the domestic agenda moved against womens reproductive health, so did the foreign aid money (which is why I really do want to recognize what Melinda Gates did making the gates foundation run against the tide there)

But the continuity of funding is usually better when its from tax not charity. So here we are, amazon withdraws, whats the replacement income stream for the projects being funded?

Amazon did a "good" thing, in the narrow context of spending money for public good. The situation this happens in is not good, and depending on charity rather than having governments fix systemic problems through tax based spending really doesn't solve the problem.
chat are-woo-kei-vee.

gpt rolls out real better lol.
Source. https://sites.psu.edu/comm150honors/2016/02/04/the-grapes-of...
Again? Does T-Mobile just not give a fuck?
Not suprising - Tmobile keeps sending me a paper bill for -$2.19 (ie I have a credit) since I cancelled my service with them 6+ months ago.

Have tried to get them to stop with no success!
Yes, I fully agree about Kurt's replies—they were unprofessional and added no value. The others that chimed in at the same time were more thoughtful (though equally scathing), but were probably colored a bit by proximity to Kurt's.

> And I find it fascinating HN cheered this one, when HN's 2nd favorite topic du jour is complaining about how large companies steamroll smaller entities whenever it suits them, without any standard process.

I think the main reason it drew so much attention is because the TrustCor rep made such a scene out of it. Evasion and deflection escalated into ad hominems and conspiracy theories. By the time it hit the HN front page, it was pretty obvious that TrustCor couldn't be trusted, so there wasn't room for any sympathy.
If you are interested in this and want to skip the 'wow isn't art history exciting' books, find a copy of The Materials of the Artist and their Use in Painting by Max Doerner. The text feels very dated at first but quickly picks up speed and gets into the intensely practical details of where pigments come from and how to make them from scratch, eg beating lead into sheets, rolling it up, and leaving it to sit in a jar of (iirc) vinegar and alum for 3 months. Essential reading for aspiring art forgers.

On a side note, if you have a chance to see The Night Watch (in Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum) go there and do it. Photographs don't do it justice, the painting is massive and the figures are basically life size. It feels very different in person.
Sorry, this is just a pet peeve of mine in general.

All the time I see people argue against “unnecessary” abstractions. But this almost always comes from the perspective of “I don’t personally understand it yet” which is just not a reasonable bar for anything to have to clear. Second most frequently it’s “less clear” which often just means “I haven’t internalized it yet” which is likewise a terrible evaluation method for something like functional iteration methods that have the possibility of being used virtually everywhere. And almost equally as often, the underlying objection is that it isn’t useful because the old way is just fine thanks, which is typically a perspective that has completely forgotten about all of the sharp edges and bugs that we all just grew to accept from the preexisting approach.

All of these types of objections are knee-jerk reactions. There are good arguments against bad abstractions, leaky abstractions, infrequently-used abstractions, overly-complex abstractions, and all sorts of other failures to abstract well. But people are so used to these that they reflexively oppose any new abstraction as overly complex or unnecessary simply because it’s new to them.

And that’s a terrible perspective to have, because quite literally all of the progress that has ever been made in the practice of software engineering has been due to abstraction.
> those on the list have a right to privacy, therefore outright leaking

Those Americans on list have a right to question their accuser in court before a right (to travel) is restricted. When did we agree to suspend due process, 14th amendment?
You're punishing the victim in this case, and incentivizing outright sabotage.
My take is that political discussion/disagreements on HN are often avoided/stamped out, to prevent it taking over the site. If anything stands out about HN politically vs. the rest of the internet, it's mostly a "we don't talk about politics here" vibe.

However, when political discussion does happen, I tend to see a very wide diversity of political opinions on HN. There's a decent number of users who are generally against any sort of feminism, LGBTQ, anti-racist views, quite alt-right feeling, and there's a decent amount of overlap between those views and libertarians. However, there's also plenty of people with very opposite opinions, very left wing, pro feminism, pro LGBTQ activism, pro anti-racist activism, etc. Kinda like Reddit, you get all ends of the political spectrum. It does have probably the most "Bay Area libertarian bro-ey vibe" of any online community I spend significant time in, and while I'm personally not a fan of that viewpoint, I also think it's only one of many viewpoints on this site.

I've encountered the odd bit of really nuts racism that doesn't get moderated/removed, even if flagged (example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31722179), but that's rare, and I think that more falls through the cracks vs. dang literally being a white supremacist.
Then you have to ask yourself whether helping with something like that is worth sticking your neck out. But make no mistake that you're doing exactly that.
は is not the "subject", it's the "topic", which is different.
I would imagine that any logistical problem looking to use so-called "ant routing" might benefit substantially from QC. Similarly for Monte-Carlo type problems.
Seems like it could be helpful as a starting point for a non-native English speaker though
There are 4 references to "motor-cars" in the book. In one it says "His exploits had been gradually
pushed backwards in time until already they extended into the fabulous
world of the forties and the thirties, when the capitalists in their
strange cylindrical hats still rode through the streets of London in great
gleaming motor-cars or horse carriages with glass sides." In another it says that the inner party members have a private motor car and sets them in contrast to outer-party members. Both of these references lead me to believe cars are rare and reserved for the elite.
Does anyone know if beta prices will be honored after beta completes?
When the company finally auctions off it's last real asset (it's name) .. then he will resign from the ash-heap he created.
Couldn't you say the same thing about faster processors? Compute power is generally useful, but it's utility is all about where you have the most computation for the least amount of money, and until you hit that point, it's not very useful. Once they hit that point, it's insanely useful for a plethora of circumstances.
I live in a highrise apartment building close to the center of a major city. It has an parking garage below the building which stretches many floors underground. During the several minutes it takes to get my car from the 6th floor underground out to the street, I've thought numerous times about how survivable a nuclear blast would be in a civilian structure that far underground, presuming of course that the upper floors didn't just collapse and bury me there forever.
I am not sure if it changes the difficulty of implementing something like this (which is/was undoubtedly a massive task) but the drivers licence number hasn't changed. There is an additional number on the back of the card called the Card Number.
I see this mentioned a lot, but I don't think it's entirely true. The book was apparently well liked in the USSR due to the obvious anti-capitalist reading. The film was imported by the government intending to screen it as a propaganda piece, but quickly cancelled.

The part about the farmer having his own truck seeming like a luxury to soviet citizens is true, but it's a bit unfair to say it was banned when the book was so well regarded.
Well done for making a mature decision. Right next to "ship it" is the "kill it" drive, and few people learn to recognize when to walk into that door.

So if I am sad, I am actually also really glad and impressed the people behind a project recognized when to stop, and rationalized how to do it.
For many people, that's $98.66 more than would have gone to a charity.
47 U.S. Code § 333 - Willful or malicious interference

No person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under this chapter or operated by the United States Government.

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/333
One aspect of the Steam Deck that hasn't gotten as much attention as I think it deserves is that it costs about half as much as any competing device with comparable specs. Why? Valve is subsidizing the cost like Sony and Microsoft have done in the past. Sell the console at cost or even at a loss, because you're going to make a 30% commission on every game sold. Gabe Newell said that the pricing is "painful", especially for the 64GB model. I suspect this won't be an issue in the long run, if others' Steam purchasing habits are similar to mine since getting a Steam Deck.
It's pretty great on GNOME tbh. It worked well on Windows 7 too.
Infant temperament extends its reach into young adulthood
yeah good luck in getting legislation that makes the twitter backend a common carrier.
Ask HN: Which sites do you spend your evenings on? Where is the “real” Internet?
For me, it has been https://old.reddit.com/r/all for many years.

But if you glance over reddit nowadays, almost everything is either a picture or video (which is probably what they wanted to achieve with their redesign?), it has gone full Eternal September, little insightful content.

And worse, if you look at the content itself, the majority of it seems to be ragebait nowadays. After watching CGP Grey's really insightful "This Video Will Make You Angry" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rE3j_RHkqJc) which explains the reasons why humans are prone to spread ragebait subconsciously, I cannot do this to myself anymore.

So I considered going back to the "real Internet", but I have spent so many years on reddit that I don't even know anymore where the "Internet" actually is.

Yes, Hacker News is very nice (I thank all of you!) and similar to pre-September reddit, but reading IT news in the evening is dangerous for me because it is work-alike and the IT industry does quite a lot of enraging things as well which I don't want to hear about before I have to go to bed.

So: Where is the "party" at nowadays?

Or is the party over for ever?
Well, it certainly is a much stronger disambiguater than those other signals. Dividing a population in half is a pretty powerful technique.

Though now that I think about it age is also potent - you get the same rough division w.r.t relative age (younger vs older than the speaker), and you can divide the population roughly into quarters with ease and accuracy. Do miss and ma'am count as pronouns here? They code for age as well as gender

Hair color and height dont really have the same sort of dividing power broadly speaking.

Still, your line of thought there about what a pronoun should capture is intriguing.
Ahh yes. Lets play the victim card. I could care less. Lets not forget that T-Mobile was storing passwords on TXT formats back in the day. Their infosec is either clueless or understaffed.
Nobody fits stereotypes on all fronts. Nobody is perfectly average, but that's not the point of personas.
Often the brigade down-voting of things that certain people consider to be a non-tech opinion is itself based on a highly-biased approach to what is appropriate for technical discussions. These are often the same sorts of discussion used dismissing discussions of alternative naming of git primary branches and other technical terms that have more accurate and less degrading names, or are entirely dismissive of codes of conduct for code repos or conferences.

I have quite often seen COVID-19 disinformation upvoted here, as well as many other conspiracy theories unique to a particular subset of the population.

I have often debated whether I want to remain part of the HN community—it is often toxic. But I also don’t want to cede space to people whose worldview is inimical to my own, so I stay and argue against the worst parts of it.
Yes, the intuition was key for me. So many of the problems could be solved with the simple box model.
apple is not going to listen to elon.
The soot from fires can actually be quite damaging globally. Here's a paper from 2020 that used state of the art atmospheric and crop models to look at the effects of the firestorms that might arise if India and Pakistan exchanged 100 nukes (about 1/3 of their arsenals) each about the size of the bomb used on Hiroshima directed at each other's major population centers.

Here's a blog article about it [2].

Here's the abstract:

> A limited nuclear war between India and Pakistan could ignite fires large enough to emit more than 5 Tg of soot into the stratosphere. Climate model simulations have shown severe resulting climate perturbations with declines in global mean temperature by 1.8 °C and precipitation by 8%, for at least 5 y. Here we evaluate impacts for the global food system. Six harmonized state-of-the-art crop models show that global caloric production from maize, wheat, rice, and soybean falls by 13 (±1)%, 11 (±8)%, 3 (±5)%, and 17 (±2)% over 5 y. Total single-year losses of 12 (±4)% quadruple the largest observed historical anomaly and exceed impacts caused by historic droughts and volcanic eruptions. Colder temperatures drive losses more than changes in precipitation and solar radiation, leading to strongest impacts in temperate regions poleward of 30°N, including the United States, Europe, and China for 10 to 15 y. Integrated food trade network analyses show that domestic reserves and global trade can largely buffer the production anomaly in the first year. Persistent multiyear losses, however, would constrain domestic food availability and propagate to the Global South, especially to food-insecure countries. By year 5, maize and wheat availability would decrease by 13% globally and by more than 20% in 71 countries with a cumulative population of 1.3 billion people. In view of increasing instability in South Asia, this study shows that a regional conflict using <1% of the worldwide nuclear arsenal could have adverse consequences for global food security unmatched in modern history.

[1] https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1919049117

[2] https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2020/03/16/even-limited-in...
20 years?
> We already know exactly what we will build.

If the non-technical person is so pointless (not to discredit them), then go ahead and build it without them. Create the value yourself.
I am trying to imagine what I would say to someone who drops ‘I feel like garbage’ within a long rambling communication with many thoughts expressed.

Now..if it was a singular sentence or text that says ‘I feel like garbage’, then I know the purpose of the communication and enquire what’s going on.

If ‘I feel like garbage’ is preceded by the reasons that explain the conclusion of ‘feeling like garbage’, then it is a conclusion of everything before it.

If it’s in the middle of the communication, then what comes after could be the explanation for ‘feeling like garbage’.

So ..at no point is it the focal subject of the communication.

One effective way is including: What, Who, Why and if they’re an ask, make it clear. Most people can’t read minds.

I am trying to be mindful about my communication and I keep changing how I communicate based on feedback. How my family reacts is diff from how it is at work.. so we need to have different groups..like concentric circles: closest circle, family..friends, colleagues..neighbors etc. it’s always equal give and take. Don’t expect more than you can give. Sometimes, certain relationships aren’t worth it and it’s better to walk away or have no expectations.