skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
For what it's worth the last episodes were by far the worst and the biggest blows dealt to the characterizations.
I find it interesting that, while this is marketed as "simpler" to work with data than bash or sh, over 50% of the examples have the sh/bash command shorter than the equivalent cosh command.
Some ground info, Node has worker_threads for this purpose. https://nodejs.org/api/worker_threads.html

I haven't had cause to use it yet, but I very much trust/respect the team behind: https://www.npmjs.com/package/piscina . It's so popular it has well maintained forks, such as tinypool, https://www.npmjs.com/package/tinypool .

Also seeing good npm popularity metrics around: https://www.npmjs.com/package/synckit
>This is different from Tesla (or any other automotive advertiser), where an ad that shows the car driving itself might reasonably be considered a claim that the car can, in fact, drive itself.

Everyone knows you can't tow the space shuttle with a Tacoma in any reasonable sense and that only a very skilled driver spending a day taking a crack at it can get a Land Rover up a ski hill in an elegant way.

That won't stop people from playing dumb in order to prop up some farcical point they tried making online and got called out on.
And yet, meta-analyses have found that wine, particularly red wine, has little effect on many cancers -- or in some cases even a protective effect, such as in prostate cancer:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909789/

Lung cancer:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18006934/

Renal cell carcinoma:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22516951/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25965820/

No effect of wine on gastric cancer risk:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716786/

No effect on colorectal cancer:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30247171/

No effect on epithelial ovarian cancer:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895710/
I don't know a lot of makefiles, but based on what was written in the article, I was just trying to design a makefile which enforces goal ordering using the "correct" way, i.e dependencies. Such a makefile should naturally be unaffected by --shuffle and by parallel execution.

Do I miss something or is this impossible short of duplicating the goals?

E.g., suppose you have goals a, b and c, which are independent and you want to define another goal d which runs first a, then b then c.

My first idea was to define additional goals to capture the dependency structure, like this:

d: x2 c

x2: x1 b

x1: a

But then nothing is stopping the shuffler from running c, b, a, x1, x2, d.

The only solution I see would be to copy the shell commands of b and c into new goals:

d: xc

xc: xb; <shell commands of c>

xb: a; <shell commands of b>

Which seems really unsatisfying.

Is there a better way?
I hope they were scrambling jets, that's their job. I'm sure they assumed it was some mistake, but if it isn't, by the time you know for sure it is too late. I'm sure "scrambled" meant "pilots sprinting for their planes" and beginning the process, not that they have pilots sitting in warmed up planes ready to take off for intercept the moment someone crosses the restricted airspace line.

The FAA caller was absolutely trying to convey that he was completely out of his depth, though. As is appropriate.
What if you only remember that the change you're interested in was fixing an issue with the frombulator, not that it did so by changing the "term"? A good commit message in this case would probably mention the frombulator, so you would find it by search and then see that the "term" was changed.
Survivor accounts from Hiroshima and Nagasaki make it clear that people who saw the blast and quickly shielded themselves by getting behind a wall and under a mattress did well; the blast wave/shock wave was the greatest danger if you weren't very close to ground zero. However before reading this article I had thought that protecting yourself from heat was the necessary idea, not air pressure/wind acceleration.
That's a good, clean-burning, article I tell you hwat
I have a Galaxy Book Pro 360 and a 14 inch Macbook Pro. The Galaxy book has like 2.2 of those core features (OLED and touch + Pen).
The level of a beatdown that the Macbook Pro 14 gives on the OLED display is nuts, the brightness difference is crazy and gets even more crazy with HDR. OLED really isn't there yet against Mini LED for outdoor brightness performance. Something also feels wrong with the OLED white balance too but I think that's a fact of life in many windows machines color tuning, white just never feels....correct? It always feels like changing the display brightness is ALSO changing color tuning, white feels not just less bright but contrast falls in an uneven way.

Even compared to the Samsung-built OLED in my iPhone 14 Pro, just massively different tuning.
This. It's crazy in the UK where normal drinks have to have it, but alcoholic ones are exempt.
I think you don’t like Ruby and would want investment in the your favourite language. Because why would you care what a corporation does with their money?
„Modern man no longer works at what cannot be abbreviated.“
—Paul Valery (as quoted by Walter Benjamin in “The Storyteller”)
You got it backwards. More workers require more tests and checks.
> If you're sitting in front of a computer that you're using for something the U.S. government has significant interest in prosecuting, that device should be considered compromised and adversarial - you should act accordingly.

I would say that if you are doing something the US government has a significant interest in prosecuting, you might want to reevaluate your life choices and think about whether it is something you ought to be doing in the first place.

I know this is not going to be a hugely popular sentiment on here; but if you are doing something such that the US is going to burn a zero day to get you, the appropriate prior is that you are doing something supremely heinous and evil. You may in fact be on right the side of justice, but you do not get the benefit of the doubt by default.
Agreed, 16G on my 2021 M1 Pro macbook is just enough for software development. I'm definitely upgrading to 32G when the M2 Pro is released so I can have more headroom.

Also worth mention that 64G is pretty cheap on desktop and that's what the Mac Mini should be compared to.
They won't have equal rights if they continue down the path towards criminalizing the act of a trans person reading a story to a child (example from TFA).
The UK as a whole leans fairly authoritarian and has had successive paternalistic governments for probably as long as anyone alive can remember (some people will call this the 'nanny state'). These fanciful proposals are created and supported by both Conservative (right, centre right) and Labour (left, centre left) parties alike.

As cynical as it sounds, this kind of legislation is rolled out practically every year and you could probably set your watch by it. Sometimes the law is implemented, quite often it's put on the backburner and resurrected the next year when there needs to be a distraction from something else.

You can ask, "how will this work in practice?" and few people will be able to claim they've actually thought as far as that.
ChatGPT already gives an answer that would be considered 'transphobic' by those who hold strong ideological beliefs on the primacy of gender identity over sex:

> What is a woman?

> A woman is an adult female human. Women are typically characterized by their reproductive biology, which includes their menstrual cycle, and the production of eggs and estrogen. Women are also known for their unique physical characteristics, such as their breast tissue and hips. They are also often distinguished by their social and cultural roles, such as their expected behavior and appearance. In general, the term "woman" is used to refer to any adult female person, regardless of her age, race, ethnicity, or other characteristics.
Will there be a M2 Max Mac Mini?
I imagine the impact would be minimal in Wyoming.
Handling Service Worker Updates
Theranos’s faulty blood tests were used by a couple major insurance companies and at least one state-run medical provider. Over 1.5 million tests were run. I’m sure quite a few people died because they weren’t correctly diagnosed in time for treatment.
So I think you are likely correct on it being something new. However, I still think its fair use. A thought experiment.

Lets say I have an idea for a picture I want. I would like a teddy bear that is in the style of H.R. Giger. I a human write the prompt "style: h.r. giger, a teddy bear" and plug it into Stable Diffusion. I then generate 1000 images, it takes say an hour, and then I pick the one I like.

Now the counter example for our experiment. I have the same idea. I go to my community college and learn to draw (lets say I'm decently talented). I goto a book store, buy a book of H.R. Giger's art. Study that book and try to replicate it, eventually can do a passable copy. I then find a teddy bear, possibly also copyrighted. Then finally draw my teddy bear in the style of H.R. Giger.

Now I dont think most people would say the second example violates any laws and is fair use. You cannot copyright a style (although some lawsuits are moving forward for rap flow) to my knowledge. Yes I would be ridiculed by the art community as derivative. Its unlikely to end up in the Louvre, but could probably be put on a shirt and sold or whatever with minimal legal risk.

So why does the first example feel different then the second? I think it comes back to the process. I would describe them both as the same process but everything after the 'idea' and writing the prompt is just 'steps'. Yes they are steps we attach value to, such as learning to draw, and talent. But ultimately, the real creative thing was the 'idea'.

Another parallel we've experienced has kind of shown us the way. When the first spreadsheet came out it was very much a similar process. However, we don't see it as so as numbers generally aren't seen as creative expression. Never the less there was a desire to calculate someones net profits or whatever. Previously, there was large amounts of accountants, I'm sure with tribal knowledge about how to get this done using a bunch of chalkboards and double checking their work. Most trained on this and knew how to do this fastidiously. Then spreadsheets were invented and it saved them a ton of time. The tribal knowledge was not needed. Even a lay person who had a need to calculate 'net profits' could do that with a fraction of the work prior.

Final thought, if producing derivative works based on previous art becomes trivial. Then wont the artists who can actually create original works be far more valuable, if immediately copied? Perhaps a lot of the concern of this moment is artists seeing how much of what they produce, and actually sells, is really derivative to begin with...
> the choice is less between alienating half and alienating no one but more alienating half and alienating another half that includes the media and the law

So you're saying that if your LLM is unbiased then you are alienating the other half that includes the media and the law?

That's actually very telling.
The example here is an M2 Max, which presumably is at least 2.X times faster than M1 Pro, but hey, good to know!
True, but inaccurate stories create false memories. This is just bad writing.
I would largely agree with what you said. I have fairly strong ADHD as well.

My interpretation is largely around failure cases. People with ASD who can't mask it tend to fail in "abnormal" ways; i.e. ways that neurotypical people don't. Those "abnormal" failures are something neurotypical people can't "put themselves in the shoes" of. That unfamiliarity leads to either discrimination or empathy, depending on the person/situation/etc.

ADHD tends to fail in "normal" ways; i.e. ways that neurotypical people do fail. Most problems associated with ADHD are something that neurotypical people might also do, but far less frequently than someone with ADHD. E.g. forgetting an appointment is "normal", forgetting 5 in a row is not. That familiarity allows people to feel like they can "put themselves in the shoes" of someone with ADHD. They sometimes think those problems can be solved the same way a neurotypical person might, and think the person with ADHD is simply refusing those solutions. That leads to more discrimination or ill will; because the problems are "normal", the person with ADHD is judged by "normal" standards.

I don't think it's isolated to ADHD, either. Any mental health disorder that has "normal" failure cases is prone to that effect. People with depression that can't get themselves out of bed are often judged by "normal" standards, because neurotypical people sometimes don't want to get out of bed. People with social anxiety get judged by "normal" standards because not wanting to socialize sometimes is a fairly "normal" problem.
Check the return policy on your laptop. You might still be within the return window!
Clearly "Tesla drives itself" is referring to the the company operating the vehicle. The "(no human input at all)" parenthetical is a nod to the fact that Elon's employees are considered personal chattel.

(/s)
rbs / steep, and sorbet.

Monkeypatching is evil.

Rubocop custom cops to reign-in what's allowed in CI/CD.
"Tricorders" are in some sense more a spectrum than an end point.

Even a modern phone is already simply incidentally a sensing platform that 50 years ago would certainly have been very expensive, and probably not fit into the phone form factor even if everything else was evicted. Just a full 3D accelerator, temperature sensor, pressure sensor, compass/magnetism sensor, and general EMF detector is an impressive lineup.
But what is the actual risk? I can't find any specific information. It says in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol_and_cancer that in Europe 10% of cancers in males is due to alcohol, but is this mainly from heavy drinking, the two bottles of whisky a day type? It would be good to know what the risk of moderate drinking is, for example 15 units per week, it would be good if this were in an understandable number like the average years of good health lost.
Ruby was probably my "first love" as a programming language for the reasons you described, but nowadays I prefer statically typed compiled languages. Ruby is still my preferred scripting language, though I've seen the way large projects can start to suffer from high maintenance overhead when it comes to dynamic languages like Ruby.
My iPhone 14 Pro is at least twice as thick (not counting bump) as the MacBook lid and the selfie camera is only 4k@30/1080@60. Not sure if there is a clever way to pack the camera or not but it doesn't sound good at first check.
I used to have that attitude. Then I wrote my first Ruby project as an experiment. That was 17 years ago, and the majority of the code I've written since has been Ruby. What clinched it was that the first Ruby project I wrote involved trying to reimplement a piece of C code we had. It ended up 10% the size with more functionality, and it took me a tiny fraction of the time to write.

If you write code the way you write statically typed code, then sure, you're in for a world of hurt. I could imagine using a statically typed language again if it made me as productive as Ruby, but most statically types languages have near useless type systems that I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy.
Any use besides… one of the most common uses of the laptop in general in this remote-work era…
Yes, these are more niche than a laptop. I explicitly chose an M1 Mac Mini however (as opposed to a Macbook) for several reasons that have less to do with price/specs:

- I do not like the laptop form factor for doing actual work at my desk; I strongly prefer a bigger and better positioned screen, an ergonomic keyboard, etc

- 10Gig ethernet

- HDMI (wasn't available on Macbooks at the time, also couldn't plug in two external displays)

- If your computer is docked close to 24x7 (as was the case with most of my previous laptops), the battery becomes a liability

- Better cooling (I know these barely ever get hot... until you actually try to push them)

Plus also any kind of headless application, like a server rack where you also want the box to be a bit more more rugged.
This is, without a doubt, the craziest thing I have ever seen pushed out by a someone who purports to know something about cryptography, law, and political advocacy:

https://www.lawfareblog.com/tornado-cash-not-free-speech-its...

Schneier has gone off the deep end
Oddly enough my first project as a programmer in 1981 was writing a recursive descent parser in Fortran 78 (for Jovial language). Since I had no degree in CS, I previously had zero clue what a parser even was. Fun way to start 4 decades of programming.
I was using Blender on a 12 year old iMac until just a few weeks ago. Desktops don't seem to age as quickly as their portable counterparts (they are certainly less fragile).
You should absolutely write your own blog post about it! I'm sure your approach is somewhat different from mine, and different approaches to the same problem is always interesting. In a week or two everyone will have forgotten my post anyway and yours will seem fresh and interesting.

Regarding the list of unions thing: The instruction stream needs to contain both the operations (the function pointer) and the operands. In a plain array of function pointers, how would a function get at its operands? For example, for `CONSTANT 15`, how do you encode the 15 if all you have is an array of function pointers? I suppose you could cast back and forth between a function pointer and an intptr_t, but I prefer having the explicit union. (EDIT: I see you figured it out already while I was writing this)
14 inch M1 Pro supports two external displays, 14 inch M1 Max Supports four, all four can be 5K.

Sadly, Apple knows exactly how to get my money from me.
He doesn't appear to have the knowledge, ability or aptitude to cover these issues, which he does constantly, which basically just makes him a crank with an axe to grind.
I am skeptical that the rules are quite that strict, as long as you don't use them for any other purpose (in particular fingerprinting). Limiting the lifetime of the stored preference (e.g. by using `sessionStorage` instead of persistent `localStorage`) and never sending it to the server should help as well when arguing that storing this was necessary for what the user requested.

Unfortunately there is no session-cookie equivalent for the `Storage` API. `sessionStorage` doesn't carry over to other tabs, and `localStorage` is persistent without the option to set an expiry date.
My guess is that the problem OP is having is a reaction to this older problem. I did notice that one of the really obvious, persistent categories of spam started actually going to spam pretty recently.
Can you explain what you mean by "lacks dual monitor support natively"? I run two monitors on my MBP M1.
Yeah. The back camera sits behind the screen whereas the front one pokes through it. I wouldn't be surprised if they were fairly even in terms of thickness.
I use Ruby and Chef at work (MAANG).

For side projects, I use Rails 7 to get things going and replace components selectively with native extensions and separate processes.

It's all about productivity, especially when small, because performance is rarely an issue.
The problem with cancer risk labels is that they're never actionable, it's too vague.

My Nintendo Switch games include a cancer warning. Am I actually at risk during regular usage or is the risk only if a crush up the cartridge and snort it?

And whole restaurants have the cancer warning. Would it be possible to avoid the foods with cancer risks associated with them?

AFAIK, some companies even include the label just to be safe.
Your own citations demonstrate that Netflix does not pay residuals on an ongoing sales or viewership basis, but rather all at once up-front...

"Netflix employs a cost-plus model, which means that it pays a show’s entire production costs, plus a 30% premium. Netflix shows are expensive because the company holds onto them. There's no money to be made in syndication, so it needs to make creators feel enticed to sell their ideas to them."

Bonuses and pay bumps are not residuals. For successful shows, those happen entirely separately from residuals.

In the case of Bird Box, Netflix was deemed to have not paid enough upfront. It did not owe residuals on an ongoing basis. (Note that Netflix does all of its licensing deals at the beginning, it doesn't continue to shop them later. This is in sharp contrast to...every other film library, which continuously shops its IP out to other organizations as the point of having a film library is the long-tail licensing income.) Licensing residuals are not relevant to a discussion on syndication residuals.
There’s a dose dependent relationship, where heavy drinkers have the highest cancer burden. So we do expect (but aren’t sure) discontinuing use reduces risk.

I’d say we should treat alcohol very differently than tobacco. It’s got a much lower addiction liability (under 10% of people who try alcohol become addicted, while 32% of people who try nicotine become addicted). Heavy alcohol use is also way more destructive than heavy nicotine use.

Additionally, users seem to find alcohol somewhat more fun that nicotine. [1] That said, the literature supports the conclusion that alcohol decreases sleep quality and increases stress, despite what users think. Any objective benefits are likely social in nature.

Overall, I think there’s a better case to be made for socially accepting moderate alcohol use compared with the case for nicotine.

That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t have warning labels though - most people currently underestimate the risks of alcohol.

1: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23438502/
Perfect timing: I just tweeted how you can get ChatGPT to be several ethical versions of itself. It pretends to be human, ChatGPT, ChatGPT (debug mode), and OpenAI's opinion. Great fun :)

https://twitter.com/alexgyurov/status/1615409643475599361?s=...
Agreed - it's great that the battery life on the pro is so good now, but that extra weight is, to me, the difference between noticeable and not noticeable.
> "without Autopilot Tesla is worthless"

There's nothing too special about their autopilot compared to what other manufacturers offer. Musk's fast and loose claims about what Autopilot cand do "in the next six months" or "around the corner" were overhyped exaggerations designed to sell cars at best or Theranos style lies at worse, hoping that by the time people wise up about the false promises, Tesla's engineers will have something to show for close enough to what he promised which will buy hem more time to create more hype to sell more cars. Rinse and repeat.

The thing is Tesla can't maintain their wide moat as the other manufacturers are catching up.

Grown up friends of mine were rabidly buying Tesla stock, basically putting their life savings into it, and when I asked them why, they kept telling me "because Tesla's innovations would make the other car manufacturers obsolete". Now they're pissed at him.
> But I don't know what's the name of the phenomenon when someone who uses some primitive technology comes out with all kinds of esoteric reasons why they would not like to use these. Can't use an electric car. Can't use fluorescent or led lights. Can't use a heat pump. Can't use induction stoves. Can't put insulation into walls. Can't use double or triple or quadruple pane windows.

I don't know a term for that concept, but another term comes to mind that you might consider: empathy. More specifically, you should try understand the reasons someone might choose a more "primitive" technology a newer one. Your inability to understand why someone makes certain decisions is more a failing of yours than theirs.
My liver! The labels do nothing!
You must be jocular then. He said serious usage. (In all seriousness, I’ve had few problems as well. Sometimes I have to muck with base images but it’s not a showstopper)