skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So we should be flat out denying the existence chattel slavery in some parts Africa and Asia still because it is not a part of the modern global economy?

The essence of what I feel is wrong about the modern discussion around exploitation of human beings is this: So we just need to accept the original sin that our modern lifestyle has the origin of the slavery of the past only, that the stuff that we buy now is not based on exploitation of labor today.

Our stuff is sometimes from sweatshops. Our gadgets contain materials like Cobalt from "artisanal" mines in Congo. But hey somebody is getting a wage for their labor so it is not slavery even if they get punished for not meeting "quotas"...
My implementation of Whisper uses slightly over 4GB VRAM running their large multilingual model: https://github.com/Const-me/Whisper
It's the margarine of meat.
I am interested to hear more opinion on excluding EMQ X as it has a Chinese origin is it fair to exclude for this reason? - EMQ X an OpenSource product available on GitHub with a mix of contributors? Would we exclude Vue JS when looking at JS frameworks for the same reason?
Seems to me like you're underinvesting in tooling. It's a mistake a lot of development shops make - you focus on your product, so you can't spend time building something completely orthogonal, but in the process you suddenly waste man-years wasting time on a broken PR process, instead of spending a month early on building some tooling that would have removed the pain in the first place.
>>Nobody actually wants to eat artificial meat

Are you just projecting your own preference on others maybe? Both me and my wife are meat eaters and we happily get "meat-like" burger patties and sausages at least once a week - it makes for a nice break from having meat all the time, even though we both like meat. And the options nowadays are pretty good, so why not eat them?
reminds me of an old story where the development team was convinced they had a good product, but feared about management intermingling, so they intentionally put a not so good feature front and center for the manager to "remove", so that the rest of the program could pass the demo unchanged.
It fits the definition of ultraprocessed food since fats and proteins are modified (that's sort of the whole point, to create a new texture).

Which to me is the downside of a lot of the "replacement" foods. Industrial, processed food, that is pretty far away from whole foods. I'd prefer to just eat whole foods instead, vegetarian or not.
Pandoc is such a great conversion program, and this new 3.0 release has so many improvements, especially for figures.

I write in markdown and export to PDF and using pygments for code syntax coloring, with .tex files to adjust layouts, tables, and the like.

https://github.com/SixArm/pandoc-from-markdown-to-pdf
In the comments:

“Ostrich eggs are a spider repellent (this is such common knowledge that authors may not feel a need to clarify this detail) and spiders are sacred in Islam because a spider saved Mohammad's life. As a matter of fact, the modern mosques in Istanbul also have ostrich eggs.”

Hmm, shouldn’t these facts make ostrich eggs kind of unholy? Anybody has a resolution?
I'm very disappointed in the cost as well. It hasn't come down at all. Not just the fake meat, but even tofu. But the cost isn't the main issue to me anymore, over the years I've come to realize I don't want to support the meat industry where profits rule everything. So I grudgingly pay the higher price of Beyond Meat.

And to be honest, it's not that much more expensive, for my particular budget. Two Beyond Meat burgers cost € 3.93, and two beef burgers cost € 2.75.
I think a better analogy would be e.g. scientists. I believe that there are certainly physicists who produce 10 times as much research output compared to the median.

But the real differentiator is in (both programming and science) the depth and quality, not quantity.
If artificial meat would taste like the real thing and cost less, everyone would want to eat it: Meat eaters and poor people because it costs less, vegans because it tastes good and does not harm anyone and rich people because they feel good when saving the earth.
By that logic, nothing is(including us).
Supplementary is in that it supplements your main restraint - the seat belt.

They should always go off if the front of the car is damaged as the description here.
Whats the plan for wasm build? We are using quickjs-emscripten for running sandboxed scripts and we would love top level async and crypto.
Because it works without borders. Do you have any trouble differentiating the sidebar from the content? I'm gonna guess no. Hence, no need for a border.
I've never been sure of the use case of hashids. They're not really a security measure since they can be easily defeated; you might as well just expose the sequential ID at that point. If you do need something with better properties, you should probably be using UUIDv6.
It just needs to be fluent in moving in physical space.
Tesla made a "language model" by converting traffic intersections to a language and running gpt-3 stuff
Honestly, I think it is just a trend. It started with the iOS settings UI, everybody copied it and is still copying it almost 15 years later. Look at the settings in Windows, Android, macOS (Ventura), Gnome. List/Detail view, and the detail pane is itself a list of mostly switches.

One downside is as you mentioned the confusion whether it is on or off (although nowadays most UIs make it double clear with color and some with additional text). But also because the switch is on the right hand side, it is further away from the text, and is visually inconsistent with radio boxes. And it is part of this "iOS settings" design language which itself is problematic, because it doesn't try to have specialized panes for each setting but crams everything into lists. (This is not the fault of the toggle, but how it is used.)

One point in defense of the toggle is maybe that it is not clear to everybody that you can usually click the text on a checkbox, making the click target rather small. But you generally can't click the text on a toggle, so it is moot.
I'm a White American living in Berlin, what word would the Berlin police put in my file??
What am I missing about why this couldn't also argue sqrt(4) is irrational?
This is purely my own subjective experience, but there is just something off-putting about the more accurate forms of plant-based meat.

I think it's because meat actually has some quite disgusting and off-putting qualities. Qualities that humans are only used to within the context of meat. For example, recently we had some pea-protein based burgers, and they had three bizarre qualities in their attempt to recreate the beef burger. First, they were quite red inside. Second, they had an almost acrid, rancid acidity to them which really did taste quite similar to beef. Finally, they had a very burger-like texture, even with pieces of simulated unwanted gristle.

So, what we get is a meat-eating experience recontextualised into the realm of vegetables. And, as vegetables, these qualities are bizarre, alien, and unexpected. We don't expect an acrid kind of acidity from vegetables, we don't expect strange chewy textures or inconceivable red juice in the absence of beetroot. So with the accurate plant-based meats the only choice is to try and forget that you're not eating meat.

Of course this doesn't happen to everyone, but it is true for me. Plant-based meat is fundamentally revolting in a way that actual meat is not, and that's kind of ironic, considering the infinitely more pleasant production of the former over the latter.

For that reason I generally prefer meat replacements that don't try to be exactly like meat: fake chicken nuggets and fish fingers are generally good, soy mince is fine, etc. Those things are far cheaper too
Play retro games on any device, saves synced, no jailbreak
Probably not but why would it be relevant in that case?
Speaking as a vegan, I'll gladly try this so long as it's done on a separate griddle, but I really do not want a copy of the taste of meat.
I understand your point. But discussing these issues in a public forum has an additional benefit in that it also raises general awareness that they're a problem.

Also, it is an interesting question. Why do we keep seeing blog designs with thin gray text, even though people repeatedly complain about it, and even though text is the centerpiece of a blog? Its not really that difficult to pick a different weight or color. So what causes this problem again and again?

Is it really the case that the rule says "We don't want to hear about accessibility problems because they are boring"? That's just awful.

If they are truly "boring" and that's the only problem, why not let the downvotes take care of it? Why flag?

If the answer is "that's the kind of community we would like to create" let me just point out my third paragraph again and say that that's trully sad.

I hope you re-asses this...
I think that Geoserver's own docs are a good starting point:

https://docs.geoserver.org/2.22.x/en/user/services/index.htm...

The thing to remember is that WMS & WFS allow you to have a dynamic map, but the concept of that dynamic nature, is stuck in the late 90's
You’re mixing up two different things.

When you're talking about "commingling" each client’s assets/deposits, yeah that's something all banks and wealth managers have done since basically forever. They will hold these assets in aggregate, and maintain a logical balance for each client somewhere (big piece of paper or a DB) then regularly (nightly at least) ensure the quantities of these two match (if they don't match somoeone needs to root-cause and fix ASAP). That's totally normal and I don't think anyone here has a problem with that.

What the OP is talking about is mixing up these client assets together with the cash and assets the company uses for its operations - payroll, trading, expenses, whatever. This is a huge no-no and regulators will come on you like a ton of bricks if they even catch a whiff of you doing this. This is meant to protect against dumb shit like FTX lending out all their client deposits to Alameda. It is still possible to fuck up under regulations like this but that'd probably be at the hands of either a very savvy fraudster in a senior-ish position in the organisation (who will certainly get caught no matter how much they cover their tracks) or a criminally incompetent CFO who hasn't been ensuring their ops staff are following processes.
I am not. This is called whiplash.

If you push and push and push, and call anyone who dissents an extremist, eventually someone will do that to you.

You'd think the woke would have realized that by now. But they seem incapable of modeling their opponents as anything other than evil.

Personally I think that if women want to unilaterally decide to keep or abort, then fatherhood should be opt-in. Fair is fair. And if fathers can't wiggle out of parenthood, neither should women.

The argument that he should've kept it in his pants is the exact same as saying she should've kept her legs shut. Either you agree with both, or with neither.
Sweden's SunRoof raises €13.5M in extension round funding
As for the whole 10x programmer debacle... well it all depends really.

Are there people who are better at programming in general? Sure. But there are also plenty of people who just seem like that because the company they work for demands less than their full expertise.

The same dev who's a '1x dev' at Google or Facebook or Apple might be a '10x dev' at a small web development agency, and a '100x dev' at a business which doesn't specialise in software engineering at all. And the same goes in reverse. Point is, the environment and how well your practices gel with those of the team/company have a huge effect on how productive you are, as do numerous other factors. It's basically the whole 'nature vs nurture' thing really, and both aspects play a role in how skilled a dev anyone is.
There are huge non-livestock farming subsidies as well, both in the US and in the EU. Farming is not directly driven by supply, demand and price the people are willing to pay (because without food people riot).
What is the point of having a HA database if your frontend app isn't running to be able to query it?

SQLite gives the guarantee that if your frontend app is running, then the DB is available as well. Try doing that with a non-embedded DB.
Absolutely, just google 'css animated checkboxes' and you'll get a tonne of solutions
Another thing you can do, hold left click on the new tab button. You will get a drop-down where you can chose which container to open the tab in.
fantastic software, never build it from source, or if you have to, make sure you have an OS that bundles all the Haskell dependencies into a single meta package
Its buggy
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1767271
There are some assumptions in there that you haven't made explicit. They're correct, but they make the proof feel a little "cheaper".

1. Let K be the set of positive integers {n: n√2 ∈ ℤ}

2. Supposing K is non-empty, denote its minimum as k.

3. Consider k' = k√2 - k = k(√2 - 1)

Lemma 1: k' < k

L1. When x > 1, √x < x. Therefore, √2 < 2, √2 - 1 < 1, and k' = k(√2 - 1) < k.

Lemma 2: k' is a positive integer

L2a: By hypothesis, k√2 ∈ ℤ.

L2b: By hypothesis, k is a positive integer.

L2c: The difference of any two integers is itself an integer, so k' ∈ ℤ.

L2d: When x > 1, √x > 1. Therefore, √2 > 1, k√2 > k, and so k' = k√2 - k > 0.

4. k'√2 = (k√2 - k)√2 = 2k - k√2 ∈ ℤ. Therefore, k' ∈ K.

5. This contradicts the assumption that k is the minimum element of K. Thus K must be empty.

To make this proof work, we needed some general information about the behavior of the square root function over the entire real domain. (Or, some special knowledge about the numerical value of √2, but from an elegance perspective that's even worse.) This is something you can easily get away with, but it's somewhat annoying. The proof based on "assume this rational number is represented in its simplest form, such that gcd(n,d) = 1" seems a little more self-contained.
Think systems integrators and compliance tests. I would imagine that each of the individual systems being "integrated" do have their own unit tests, upstream, in their own repos.
I think that is the eventual evolution of someone who becomes vegan or vegetarian. But those fake meat products definitely help someone who's been eating meat their whole life and never really had to think about how you prepare a meal that where vegetables are the centrepiece.

I still buy some frozen whatever-the-fuck that I can just whack in the air fryer and have ready in 10 minutes when I can't be bothered cooking, but now that I've been vegan for like eight months most of my diet is whole vegetables and grains, and if I've been out cycling that day I'll have some tofu or beans for protein.

The fake meat definitely helped me ease into it, and if I'm eating with my meat-eating mother and it's her turn to cook then it's easy to have something she doesn't have to think about.
To read one full line on [2] moving my eyes is not enough, I have to move my head. It's tiring, and when you're at the end of a line it makes it harder to come back to the beginning of the next line. Just reading a few lines on your screenshot, I ended up reading the 3rd line 2 times because my eyes went back to the wrong line, and because the lines are long I forgot the beginning of the line I just read.

So yeah I'd say [1] is strictly better for readability than [2].
The female part of the patriarchy (a word I hate) is not to be underestimated. The idea that men should be more in touch with their emotions is nothing but a narrative, reality is exactly opposite to it.

Women do not select for emotional men. They select for status, wealth, attractiveness. Only when those qualities are met FIRST, perhaps you may also share some feelings here and there, but do keep that shit in check.

The above sounds brutal and primitive, but every social study and dating research confirms it. And it makes perfect sense as it 100% aligns with biological incentives, as much as we want to deny those.
Agreed. The pea protein though. All the food chemistry technology that enables such proteins to make deep fried nuggets, or vegan ice cream, and so on, that fits the definition of processed food. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7399967/
In Germany this is simply not true.

All supermarket chains, at least in the cities, now have a considerate selection of plant based meat and it sells like bread. Yes, it is sadly more expensive than real meat for now.

Still -- vegan burger patties are regularly sold out.
I assume it's part of the 'make everything usable on a phone' thing, regardless of whether you are actually using a phone, so the thing that only contains a half screen of information is now spread over 4 screens.

But then you also have the designers that like to make things pretty, rather than give you any hint that some text is in fact clickable.
I am curious. What is a strong opinion? How do you define it?
"Processed" as in, this food has been altered from its original state. i.e. Peas = not processed, pea protein = processed. The exact cutoff of how much processing is allowed is kinda up to the individual, but generally when you hear people talking about processed foods being bad, they are talking about almost anything that isn't a "whole" food, i.e. vegetables, whole grains, etc... So things like homemade pasta sauce, even if made with simple ingredients, would be a processed food.

The advice to avoid processed foods isn't necessarily to avoid nasty chemicals, it is to avoid high calorie, high salt, high fat foods that often strip out the healthiest parts of the constituent components during processing. For example, the healthiest part of a potato is the skin, but very few "processed" foods made from potatoes will keep the skin on as part of the processing. You can make a pretty healthy french fry by using organic potatoes and air frying instead of deep frying, but at the end of the day, you would have been better off just eating the whole potato. That is the argument that is generally being made when people talk about processed foods.

I personally like the new plant-based meats and hope they succeed, but I definitely consider them processed food and limit my consumption to every once in a while. But I also consider normal burgers to be processed food, because of the bun and sauces, and in many cases the patty. Using really good pasture raised meat to make a burger patty is way more expensive than any of the plant-based patties. And the cheap meat based patties are probably made from factory farmed animals full of antibiotics. So I am fine paying a little more for a non-meat patty that kinda mimics the real thing. Even if I consider it a processed food, I think I would rank it above the cheap meat patties in terms of health risks.
Ubisoft CEO Apologized for the “Ball in Your Court” Comment
This is a hilarious comment and definitely worthy of being flagged for starting a flame war, but I'm totally behind the fact that you've laid bare these questions and opened them to debate.

My own response would be: Is it possible that if every version of schadenfreude and psychopathic antipathy toward other humans is deeply embedded in the fake-meat-making process and it still can be commercially successful and serve several purposes ethically/environmentally/economically if it's popularized, do the impure individual motives outweigh the greater good?

Because the poor will eat it if it's cheaper; the rich will eat it if it's more ethical or if it's dolled up more expensively; the outcomes touted by the environmentalists will be the same whether they do it out of love for cows or hatred for mankind, won't they?
> I do want every new tab I open to come with a clean slate

I'd like that too, how can you do that?

I've been using Firefox containers for a while. When I open a new tab it opens in the default non-container which carries it's own storage cesspit.
Honestly, i don't think there's a single answer because there isn't a single audience.

One issue I encounter is in group discussions e.g. management meetings. Lack of detail up-front leads to derailment from edge-cases or whataboutery as the conversation moves on. Whereas excessive detail up-front leads to derailment from nit-picking, or abject boredom, or failing to catch all the detail.

During this sort of conversation I scribble notes about the points I want to raise. Then let everyone else talk to see if my points are raised or if I learn something new. Finally, I try to raise points by saying something like "there are three things I'd say about X", followed by a super-brief headline for each point. Single sentences. That should be enough, but if not, I'd expand each as required.

But even this has issues. Management meetings can be fraught, and time is scarce. Waiting until after others have spoken means that they may have sucked the life from the conversation and people may be impatient to move on. I'm aware of coming across as someone who simply wants to stick their beak into every conversation.

So, I've tried to be more Zen and simply let things go, or take certain conversations off-line i.e. discuss in depth outside the room. Results vary.

Good luck! :)
FF has that profile system too.
european enters the chat
Right, but then it fails the second prong of my criteria.
The better solution to "is this the default" is to just have some mechanism for indicating whether the value has been changed, and a way to reset it to its default.

This is quite common in UIs. It also has the benefit of working for all controls, not just checkboxes.
Differences in GNU/BSD sed is hardly a bug in Make.
"How else would I pay a cybercriminal without Crypto?"

Before cryptocurrency became widespread, they were limited to gift cards and MoneyPaks, which kept the ransoms to the several hundred dollar level, and therefore to the "oops, clicked on a dodgy site," individual PC level, rather than the finely targeted attacks on organizations able and often willing to pay multimillion dollar ransoms, and the criminal ecosystem that has developed around that.
Flipper Zero does it all: Advent of Code 2022
got close to quitting a few times, but here it is at last: a full solver for the flipper zero!
IMO they tried to strike a balance, the existence of Smile helps drive traffic to Amazon and improve their PR, but they make it harder than it should be (you have to use a speciic link, you have to enable push notifications on mobile etc.) so they don't end up having to pay too much. Logically they could have made Smile an option you set once and it's applied forever, but they didn't.
No, I know - thank you - but I mean there is no Explorer at that path in regedit for me.
Marketing budget != personnel budget. Former is thought of as generating income directly. Latter, ideally, generates income eventually but to non techies tech staff is an unfortunate requirement. Decades ago I was told by my sales-grown ceo that “only the sales force make the company money, the rest of you are just a cost centre”.
Ah yeah, here [0] MUI's xl breakpoint is 1536px, which is 24px wider than the integer scaled width (1512px). You'd also ideally like a little margin too, so really 1600px is kind of a bare minimum for web dev work IMO, so I imagine most people are scaling up to (the non-integer) 1800x1169.

[0]: https://mui.com/material-ui/customization/breakpoints/
As far as I know, the "signed" thing is something else.
The music from tape will be scratched to a template for the press. This template is called (in DE) "Mother". The first run on this "Mother" is signed by the guy who is in charge for the press. These records get hand signed. "Highenders" go for these if they can, because they have the best quality. (as far as I know)
This is similar to the proof of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic (from which the irrationality of the square root of 2 trivially follows): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_arithme...