skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Is there a simple ublock fix that one can apply?

No.

> What's the easiest way to fix this?

Use a browser extension that adds the useskin=vector query parameter to all Wikipedia URLs.

Here's an example using Redirector: https://cohost.org/two/post/868713-on-the-subject-of-ch
How to Integrate Machine Learning Models to Your Web Applications
Integrating a trained machine learning model into a web application can be a complex process, but with the right tools and approach, it can be done relatively easily.
https://symfony.com/doc/6.2/the-fast-track/en/index.html
Why should they have helped McCarthy? He's one of many Republicans who bent the knee to Trump and the scourge of the "alt-right", and he reaped what he sowed.

It's not like the Republican party was trying to correct itself by going with a staunchly anti-Trump country-over-party moderate.

One party is clearly taken over by lunatics, while the other maintains a much more moderate posture, yet you blame the one attempting to stay sane over the one that is making conspiracy theories part of its core platform.
I completely believe you. I got in a similar situation in 2020. In that case it was a change of password of the main account that went wrong. How?

Don't know, I have a password manager that captured the password I inputted and it was exactly as it should inputted. But when I put it in google it told me that it was incorrect.

When I commented to people, everyone told me that they could change their password doing this and that, but... I wasn't. Looks like there are different security levels based on arbitrary rules and what an user could do, I was unable to do it.

I only had the account logged in in my phone, and every day I kept restoring the account, every day to be unsuccesfully.

One day, after 5 weeks from the day it happened, doing exactly the same than the previous days, one of the recovery attemps worked out, and was able to reset my password.

It completely put me off using google services, but God, it is hard to abandon your first mail services, I got way too many things hooked up with them.
Many UI frameworks these days seem to think so.
Plex can do acoustic analysis on your library and uses that analysis for its recommendation algorithm - I find it works pretty well.
If you're on Android, get Aegis. It's better anyway and you can export backups.
Go to Israel and say that. It is a feature but it is not unique. The US is a target for a variety of reasons. While a more mundane cause is likely, the implications of an attack are significant thus it would be unwise scoff this concern off as mere paranoia.
> In Switzerland meat is expensive. Organic ground/minced beef from Farmy is something like $15-20/lb. Organic chicken breast is $50/lb (around $15/breast).

That's insane. I'm in the USA and I can get organic ground beef for under $7/lb. Organic chicken breast for $8/lb. Both can be even lower if I buy in bulk.

If you don't care about it being organic, then both of them get to $3/lb.
As a vegan with things like sardines and insects is that, at least currently, we can't gauge if they can suffer or not, so err on the side of caution and don't eat them.
This is great. From one of those pages:

> Now with 55 years hindsight I realize that both our study group and the government nuclear safety committee overlooked other possibilities such as that a malevolent programmer might have been able to launch a missile all by himself. There was no certainty that such a scheme would have worked inasmuch as the SAGE software was reviewed by multiple people who might have questioned any odd-looking code. Nevertheless, we should have considered that possibility and taken steps to ensure that it didn’t happen. The reason we didn’t was that there was no such thing as a malevolent programmer in that era (1950s and ‘60s) – we were all honest, upright, and altruistic, so the idea that a programmer might sneak in evil code was inconceivable. Later experiences on the Internet have revealed other possibilities.

IIRC, Bertrand Russell had an observation about Western philosophers on a related question: they had a blind spot, in that they extrapolated too much from themselves, who weren't representative of everyone.
If I understand, bad (against user interest) defaults can be called a dark pattern, but shouldn't purposely misleading state indication also deserve the direct label: deceptive practice?
Eslint the hecky out of it
But be careful. If you access the passwords and 2fa secrets via the same credentials you are back to one factor authentication if secret + pass store ever get compromised.

Imho it's a different story if you use a separate gpg-key/secret to access the 2fa secrets (which should also only happen in emergency cases).

This can easily be done with pass.
just be happy you didn't get caught up in the g+ debacle. i did exactly what they told me to do to keep from using a real name across their services and they fucked me 10 ways to sunday for doing so.

brand account worked great up until ~2013, then they changed something and my settings are all greyed out. can't update phone numbers, can't view mature content, etc. all i can do is collect adsense while the account lasts.
An app can deny access to take screenshots in Android. In iOS, there's no way to deny screenshots, but apps can be notified if a screenshot is taken. What the app then does with that information... you may not know ahead of time. Be careful out there!
That's like this function in this legacy code I am working on has an alert function for creating the bootstrap alerts with options like "dismissible_off" and "autohide_off" instead of just "dismissible" and "autohide", also they're just integer values (0 or 1) instead of boolean. I have to think about it way too much when I use it wondering if I have the setting correct.
Every company in healthcare (and many other industries where privacy is important) needs to know that they should not be giving customer data to third parties.
Thanks a lot for sharing the code.
It does indeed make it order of magnitude easier for me to understand and validate my own theory and assumptions about it.

For context when I was like 6 years old I was writing code in BASIC on a “TRS-80 Model III” to do linear algebra for fun (trying to make an arcade game).

But never learned algebra until I was forced to at ~20 years old in university.

So my understanding of mathematics was always mechanical (algorithm) and never very abstract.
And it always was extremely hard to read research paper because the Greek letter don’t even mean the same thing in a (Statistic/ machine learning) paper and in a (physics/ calculus paper). And the author never properly define all the function and variables and assume you are already an expert.
Because in this instance, the consequence is that this data can now enable a quasi-fascist minority to impose their religious views on others, with consequences of serious jail time for (in other states) innocent and vulnerable women.

When will people realize that surveillance capitalism is morally bankrupt (aside from also being a fraud), and that personally identifiable information is toxic waste?

This is so far beyond "Don't Be Evil" . . .
> I TOTALLY am the person who would inherently monologue for 3 hours when asked a simple question by a cop

Then for you especially, but really for everyone -- don't talk to the cop without a lawyer. Just don't. (at least if you are in the USA).

For all the reasons you mention. Lying to the cops can be committing a crime in itself. Trying to think it through and figure out exactly how much of the truth to tell in what way -- can either leave you accidentally committing the crime of lying to the cop, OR accidentally incriminating yourself (even if you don't think you've done anything wrong). The cops have way more training and practice and experience at this interaction than you, you will not outsmart them.

In the USA (and probably other places, but I know the USA), you have the right to not talk to the cops without a lawyer, and you should exercize it, even if you think you've done nothing wrong. (Plenty of people who think they've done nothing wrong end up screwed by the cops).
I used to do this but it was a hassle to set up. I can't imagine a normal person (less interested in tech) to use this.
> As part of the debt issuance suspension period, the agency will begin to sell existing investments and suspending reinvestments of the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund and the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund. Also, it will suspend the reinvestment of a government securities fund of the Federal Employees Retirement System Thrift Savings Plan.

ah! ye olde 'sell the motorcycle on craigslist' and 'cancel the cable subscription' technique!
Yup, people keep promoting this stupid idea. You simply need too much mass to store power economically this way. We already do it on a small scale--pumped hydro--but it's simply impractical for anything more than a peaking plant.
Scientists Black Holes with 34B Times the Mass of Our Sun
I used this a lot while in school, very useful!
Epp's book is my favorite Discrete Math book by far. Her writing style is very clear and easy to follow. And as you say, there are good exercises. And if you buy an older edition, used copies can be had for a (relatively) reasonable price.
I Like Nox
I've dealt with a different situation before and handled it with sharding. It's pretty easy to retrofit in code, and it's not hard to do a one-time move of existing files to the new layout.

Simply put, you make an algorithm like:

let hash = md5(filename)
let folderPath = path.join(root, hash.substr(0,1), hash.substr(0,2), hash.substr(0,3), filename)

The original name can be used to derive the sharded path, so you don't need a lookup database or anything crazy like that.

You end up storing files like:

.../7/7f/7fa/somefile.png

This scales to whatever depth you want: with 3 levels and 1.2 million files, you can expect about 1200000/16^3 = 293 files per directory, which is trivial.

There's lots of other strategies, too, depending on your needs:

# filename are already GUIDs or hashes:
.../1/1f/1fd/1fd2dd27-d307-47b2-b37d-11903fd0f03d.png

# date-based to make cleaning up old files easy:
.../2023/01/19/app.log

# hash by existing numeric identifier (like customerid) using modulus:
.../customers/4/94/52194/customerfile.dat
Yes.

For CWT in specific, the original articles (in popular science magazines like Discover or PopSci) described the desire to process various kinds of plastics, much like the linked article talks about. The methane would be tapped off early, and used the power the production process, with the end product being various kinds of oils.

It wasn't clear why CWT decided to pivot to processing turkey waste. They were hamstrung by fluctuating prices for the waste stream, that (IIRC) could be used as an input for fertilizer production.
Thank goodness they are not as hung up on having a button as it initially appears:

"We are currently considering adding single-click functionality for the most-frequently used languages."

Sadly, while that means that the overall experience will be improved, it will solve exactly nothing for those who are unlucky enough to use a less-frequently-used language.
Because SMS may not arrive. E-Mails may be delayed or blocked by spam filters. You may not have e-mail set up on the device you're trying to log in from - so what will you do with a link on another device?

Meanwhile, a password is something you already have at hand and works instantly.

Recently tried 3 weeks to setup Slack because it's magic mail did not arrive. Was even unable to reset the password. We just gave up and used another e-mail service provider and created a ned account.
You're right, but it will still work as written.
People also adopt religions to be fashionable, and they don't follow all the tenets of that religion. Seems bad-faith to ask someone who professes a moral stance why they don't behave more like someone who is just professing that moral stance to be fashionable.
In a reasonable political system, that us what would have happened. Not necessarily with McCarthy, but some type of coalition government with bipartisan support. Frankly, if they wanted to and could get near unanimous agreement internally, the Democrats probably could have had their pick of Republican as speaker.

Several aspects made this difficult to do though:

1) Given our political climate, no one wants to vote for the other party to be speaker. It would be political suicide in a primary

2) For as long as it felt like the vote took, the Democrats did not have enough time to whip support for anyone other than McCarthy.

3) McCarthy would be taking a very big risk in forming an agreement with Democrats here

4) An individual politician crossing party lines without support of their party leadership would be political suicide. Not just due to voter perception, but because of how important institutional support is.

5) As you say, the appearance of Republican dusruption is goid for the Democrats.

With all of that, I'm not convinced that the concessions are that big of a deal. The core dynamic is that bipartisan agreement on high profile issues is a non starter, and the Republicans have a razor thin majority and several members willing to play hardball.
Are you arguing that the fact that the supreme court is not very democratic means that an even less democratic and much more censorious system of billionaires should be allowed to control political speech?

The supreme court has been a massive back door for billionaires to override the democratic process since the 1789 constitution took effect. America had already existed for over 150 year at that point and the principles of freedom of political speech stem from the existing people and culture not the flawed 1789 constitution.
From: https://www.youtube.com/@Plastic2oiltv/about

> "Blest Co., Ltd. went bankrupt in 2017 and started a business as a freelance engineer. Currently, I am setting up and running a consulting company on plastic fuels."

So I guess this is not Blest (which I heard first time.)
That's as meaningful as saying you can't gauge whether plants suffer or not - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wound_response_in_plants#MAMPs...

I think we can get a pretty good ballpark estimate, by virtue that suffering categorically requires a certain level consciousness.
There is no option to add another authenticator app at https://myaccount.google.com/security (desktop UI). I think the only feasible option is to first remove Google Authenticator and then re-enable it.

Seriously, Google?

Might be micro, but this is not a sign of a healthy company on an upwards trajectory.
The enjoyment of Math (https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/enjoyment-of-math-hans-rade...). Best book ever. Made me fall in love with math as a teenager.
KeepassXC lets you store the TOTP seed value associated with an entry by right-clicking on that key and selecting "Setting up TOTP".

Also, other TOTP generators like Authy and Aegis let you backup your tokens to restore to another device.
What sort of reason do you have to believe that sabotage is involved, when it is adequately explained by the positive feedback loop of out-of-position calls exceeding the rate at which the can be answered?
Smiling was a low interest rate phenomenon
Printing it out and putting it in some safe is what i did.

And works like a charm.

I mean, if it works for crypto wallets it might also work for 2FA...
I thought there was already client side options for prefers dark (as well as prefers reduced motion and others) Maybe there's room for a "prefers limited width text"?
I believe Trump mentioned 911 conspiracies a couple times and Republican voters approved of it. There are no mores anymore.
Whenever one of these threads about Google (or Apple) come up, I am shocked at the lack of response from people working at those companies. It seems reasonable that this site would be where you'd find someone from a team that interacted with logic that OP is having trouble with.

I'd expect to see something like a "hey, yeah, I know a guy on our team that might be able to get in touch with the team who maintains this. I've sent them this thread"...

I'm hoping OP got a private message.
The State of Developer Ecosystem 2022 in Rust: Discover Recent Trends
I didn't mean don't do it because of impact on your resume, I meant don't do it prematurely because it slows down your progress.
> Says who? Is there a law that forbids it?

Forgive me, but this is a non-sensical question. I can ask you the same. Who says I should deliver product that has value? Is there a law for that?

Between (performance, scalability, fancy tech, etc) and (growth, UX, features), which one is Software Engineering and which one isn not? Why we have UI Designer an UX Designer? Shouldn't we call them all just Software Engineering? You clearly see which metric matters to a software engineers (performance, scalability...) and yet you say the software engineer should not do that and just do something else (UX, growth...) ? And who should think about performance, scalability...? The UI Designer, I think, right?

And the value of a product is combination/unification of all these things (performance, scalability, ux, ui...) and who should think/plan about that? I guess only the software engineers should worry about that, on top making architectural decision. And the CEO who runs and has vision for the product, what should they do?
If you plug in a semi recent Samsung phone to a USB-c monitor, not only will it charge, but you will also get some kind of desktop experience on the monitor.
Now take a look at incomes and wealth globally. Fair is you getting a lot poorer.
You can export a database inside the WordPress admin and convert to Jekyll.

https://wordpress.org/plugins/jekyll-exporter/
> "our ability to have an impact was often spread too thin"

If that's the supposed reason, I call bullshit. Could've just reduced the number of charities.
Not sure which political party you mean, given they've traded power multiple times over the course of the past 35 years.
In case anyone else is following along, a patent by Pringle has had a very intriguing set of assignments.

Started out with the corporation by Pringle and Co in 2009, rest is below:

2009: GREENTECH ENERGY SOLUTIONS LTD.

2010: UNIVERSAL ALTERNATIVE FUELS, INC.

2011: GORTAGCH DEVELOPMENT LIMITED

2015: GREENTECH ENERGY SOLUTIONS LTD.

Pringle also has a 2020 patent application pending that references the 2006 original filing.

[Edit] Thank you forgot it

2006: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7629497B2/
2020: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200399541A1/en
It's a mistake to believe that every user will uniformly see the same things on the same pages. Google's account abuse system will offer different options to different users based on how suspicious their behavior appears to be.
Well put. Could adding either the words: "Current state:" or "Action:" clarify this?

With toggles, I'd almost rather see them aligned center with explicit state description to either side.
> Far more than 1% of pregnancies carry health risks.

Indeed; I'd put it at about 100%. Pregnancy is no joke.
You're tone policing, and you did imply that Schwab's outlook is guided by half-century old intuitions and called into question his cognitive abilities, basing both on nothing but his age. That is ageist. How do you know he's not open-minded and up-to-date on all the latest research?
Maybe too late to give you any helpful advice, but setting up Advanced Protection may make sense. You need to buy at least two (preferably three) YubiKeys and the password plus any of these keys allow you to login to your account. Nothing more, nothing less. Costs a few bucks, but at least the auth flow is very clear.

Another thing you can do is to wait for a week and see if anything changes. Having the session last for more than a week may give you more options in passing the challenge.
Why do you say the balancing should be left to the Federal Reserve? If we are going to have executive branch institutions rectify Congresses instructions by disregarding one of them what is your principled reason for saying its the Federal Reserve's responsibility to fix the shortfall by issuing more debt in violation of the law instead of say the IRS's responsibility to fix the shortfall by collecting more taxes in violation of the law?
Exactly. Push-on/push-off switches -- analogous to a checkbox -- have been popular for decades and remain so.

https://www.allelectronics.com/item/pb-173/spdt-on/off-pushb...
> “You should not point a gun at someone that you’re not willing to shoot,”

This argument from the prosecutor is so plainly absurd in the context of filming a movie with a prop, I can't imagine they believe they're going to get a conviction here.

If the gun wasn't fired then, it would have been fired at an actor during a scene, as happened with Brandon Lee. Hard to see how anyone other than the person who loaded the gun is responsible.
For what it's worth, version 3.0 of the RM's software now allows endlessly scrolling down.
If you want the quickest and dirtiest solution to your problem, then oathtool is for you:

$ oathtool --totp -b "S3GXITTAZXNN4LCPXWQREDYBIE"
646063

Otherwise, most password managers, i.e. Bitwarden, have integrated TOTP support.
> Gemini doesn't even allow site authors control over the design or layout of their content

Of course not. End users should have control of their experience. Why should someone else get to control what my software does on my machine? Why should some designer somewhere be the authority? I'm going to pick the fonts and colors and styles I want.

Seems like a pretty punk-rebellious attitude to me.
Thank you so much actually
I was recently trying to log into Slack on a new computer. It required a login and password, and then emailed a 2FA code to my login email. Then it _also_ wanted 2FA code from my mobile app, which it seems wasn't configured correctly on my new phone. The experience left me with multiple questions - what needed to be transferred from my 2FA app on my old phone to my new phone that didn't make it? Why wasn't the email code good enough (as that is literally already two factors?)

I've largely stuck with strong passwords for most of my accounts because of issues like these, and others I saw first hand - such as when my dad used to have a password db on a palm pilot. He had no backups, some point the device fails, everything was lost. I only felt comfortable moving to a password db once dropbox became a thing as a result - the balance of security vs. usability is pretty shit if there's a single point of failure with no recovery possible, and I'm not inclined to set up some backup process manually (dropbox has reliably been something I haven't had to think about for a decade.)

2FA feels a lot like that to me, except now with multiple points of failure that can be difficult to recover. Backup codes feel half-baked; it strikes me as the kind of thing that was tacked on to help the issues around hardware failure/human error that one _should expect and design for_; instead, we put the onus on the user with "your account may be unrecoverable" warnings as an excuse.

A better system, IMO, would have N factors and require one less. Keepass is the place where this has bothered me for some time - I can configure things so my db requires a password, and a file, and a Yubikey - but why can't I have two of three? Hell, why can't I have _one_ of two? If I'm in a car crash and die and I want one particular person to cleanup some aspects of my virtual life, it'd be nice if I could give them a key file and let them know there's a Yubikey in a safe deposit box. I feel secure, as no one has all three tokens but me and two are always needed; but I also feel the system is durable, in case something is forgotten, crushed, lost, etc. I dunno, maybe there's people or companies that already do stuff like this and I just don't know about it.
Matt Yglesias and the Secret of Blogging