skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I understand the point of this blog post but it's also kind of BS.

For example, the last one about how to handle unexpected situations. Some people have a tendency to panic or have high anxiety over the unknown. That doesn't mean they aren't of high character or you shouldn't do business with them. They could have built their entire lives to anticipate these types of situations and have other coping mechanisms to help deal with it. In a work environment, they could easily have those things in place.

To just spring something on someone without any context or knowing the person feels like a really, really poor "test" of anything.
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eidas-regu...
Some of the anecdotes seem completely fabricated to provide a convenient example (i.e. the guy’s wife was very observantly watching him play a round of golf with a colleague and caught him cheating?)
> Others in the thread have mentioned they have gotten nearly identical plans to their old employer plans.

One person said this, without mentioning either their state or any details of their previous plan.

> a "blue northeast state" that, according to you, has inadequate options.

I did not say that every "blue, northeast state" has "inadequate options". I said that many states have terrible options, and that, contrary to the stereotype of ACA issues being limited to poorer red states that refused to expand Medicare, this set includes wealthier blue states.

> Do you have any evidence that the plans aren't sufficient?

You stated that "public exchanges are guaranteed to cover their existing condition", an assertion of universality. This is completely false, for reasons that I have explained. The federal statues guaranteeing coverage for individual conditions are incredibly narrow and exclude both the most expensive conditions for patients, as well as almost all expenses for chronic conditions.

Furthermore, it's very easy to disprove this assertion of universality, because it's incredibly easy to find counterexamples - the ACA has been around for a decade, and there are tons of forum posts all over the past ten years from people struggling to find non-COBRA coverage that continues to match their needs after losing a job. A marketplace plan cannot deny you an insurance plan for a preexisting condition, but that doesn't mean that there exists a marketplace plan that will cover it.

The fact that you happen to know people who are satisfied with their coverage for themselves is neither here nor there, because it does not contradict the main point: the ACA is no guarantee that people losing their jobs will actually have any non-COBRA options to address their health needs (and given that Microsoft has pretty comprehensive insurance and employs people in nearly every state, it's all but certain that the marketplace options will be appreciably worse for many of those people than the status quo).
As I already mentioned, I do not care about the point you are arguing. I only care about the point I made, which is "assuming Seinfeld DID end early, why did they do that, and what can people learn from it".
I'm right now sat on a comparably remote island in the Alaska fishery, relatively new here. I've always romanticized the sea, landlubber as I am, and after a few months here, I went to Waikiki for vacation and - hated it. I couldn't leave soon enough. Too much happiness. The people here have mostly been here for many years, and will remember someone they worked on a boat with for a few weeks in the 80s or what-have-you. I have time to read, be left alone when I want to be, grab a beer off-site. I can see why healthy people would go insane, and why insane people would go healthy.
Can you elaborate more on your process, and the venue/focus of the writing?
>>I mean it’s not like we didn’t beg people to discuss the economy in more detail.

We did, the problem is many of us reject Magical errr Modern Monetary Theory which is in large part what drives connecting the manipulated and inaccurate "unemployment" numbers (normally the U3) as an indicator of economic health which it is not in any way
Do I need to justify?

Do you read the news? Are you aware of the current environmental crisis and climate change crisis?

Global population has been exploding since the 50s and, coincidentally so have emissions and environmental destruction.

The HN crowd is not that fast, sometimes.
Smaller market (hopefully), but then it'd serve as CRM for serial cannibals.
Doesn't work that way. Passwords are inferior but still a strong layer of defense. You are putting all your eggs in one basket again. The lesson from passwords is that a single factor of authentication is inherently inferior to multiple factors of authentication. From a threat actor's perspective, even a yubikey is a matter of one well planned attack (physical, compromised host,etc) and by nature newer factors of auth don't get treated with hostility like with passwords. They are better than passwords but what I see is people moving away from MFA to only a yubikey for example. Like you are now one lost yubikey away from your whole company getting owned lol.
> someone who grew up reading serif fonts would feel much more comfortable reading a document with a serif typeface than someone like myself who doesn't interact much with serif fonts

I grew up reading books, so I suppose I count as someone who grew up reading serif fonts. I find sans serif fonts to be incredibly difficult to read. They only are a win for small on-screen text since there aren't enough pixels for serifs. I have a sans-serif font for my window titles. Reading more than a single paragraph in sans is fatiguing to me.
Until it's not though. This is a pretty major architectural constraint on your code that you would not hit quite so early with a faster language.
Those kids often are the worst bullies!
Well I'd word it that it can be reconciled; the energy-recovering air exchangers are exactly what reconciles it.
But how? How did a scammer log into your account in order to set up a transfer?
I think that the innocent response to this question is that the rising costs of secondary education and healthcare in the U.S. almost make it imperative to figure out how to put some money aside for future generations. At least that is my personal goal.
> I want to engage with my kids while they care

Interestingly, some of my fondest memories are a kid were going to work with my parents.

This newfound fascination with steering completely clear of work until one is deep into their 20s is a big problem here. Not only does it result in things like the parental separation you allude to, it also means that the child isn't making money during their most important earning years, requiring even harder work and less play later in life to try and catch up.

And for what? More time at the babysitters? That does not seem like a win. It seems quite silly, really.
I just took three weeks off and sat in my apartment. I was borderline close to quitting my job due to some sort of burn out. Prior to my vacation I had a discussion with my manager about what was causing me frustration. She took steps to fix and restructure my work to relieve stress. For instance, a more senior engineer was micromanaging me and it wasnt adding any value at all. She stopped him from doing that.

I came back from work and now I actually feel great.

But I literally did nothing on that time off. I just watched TV, hit the gym, slept.

You can recover/avoid from burnout if people at your job are willing to work with you to change the situation. The big issue is most people in a work relationship are not even capable of changing work patterns. They dont have the management skill to do it, and will have the conversation, but continue down the same path. Thats when you leave.
Which turns out to be completely wrong in the end though lol.
> dating as I define it is horribly broken

Socializing as a whole is broken, triggered by the disappearance of third places, the dissolution of communities at the altar of the nuclear dual-income family, live-at-work jobs and "hustle culture" (Veblen entrepreneurship), and the unlimited streaming doom-scroll.

With nowhere to go but work and home, good luck finding anyone to date or befriend via a nonexistent organic social network.
They don't have to hire people who already know Zig -- just people capable of learning it.
I disagree. A small subset of us sees things around them and says "I'll come up with a solution for that". Some of them work on problems that aren't really problems for most of us. Others work on problems everybody would love a solution for and fail. Neither of them are likely to not have a good life, because we extremely reward the successful search, but we also reward the search if it wasn't successful. Founders who ran companies don't transition to the gutter when they fail, they transition to a senior project management role where their skills are useful.

We don't reward hedonism, not even trying to solve any problem and avoiding the search for solutions. I haven't heard an argument why we should, why individuals not trying to contribute at all is desirable to a society.
Peter Thiel Says British Affection for NHS Is Stockholm Syndrome
Is this OK? Autocomplete suggests the text with what appears to be someone's username.

https://freeimage.host/i/HaLPXDB
ChatGPT Can Give You Superpowers If You Use It Wisely
What are the current requirements to run that model?
Subnets look to still be /64s it sounds like each VM is just being given /96 worth of IPs instead of /128 worth of IPs. Regardless of how it's implemented the impact on applications/rules/etc shouldn't really be any different unless up until now you've only ever deployed 1 VM per /64 subnet.
In this situation, neither party need be aware that the other party is 'antisocial' in this regard. The way I see it, the following situations apply for a tool that produces communication indistinguishable from the user's own writing (AI)...

"AI" for the following cases would be beneficial:

Social -> Antisocial

Social <- Antisocial

"AI" for the following cases would be net neutral:

Antisocial -> Antisocial

Antisocial <- Antisocial

And finally "AI" would be inapplicable (since neither party would use it) in the following cases:

Social -> Social

Social <- Social

In this drastically simplified model, there aren't any cases where the existence of a sufficiently competent AI would be detrimental to any party involved, while still providing value for those who choose to use it.
What would be the tagline?

"Forcible dating"?

You 2, date right now!
It's a bit sad that you're afraid of expressing your opinion because you might lose some fake internet points.

So what?
That works for a really small amount of code (like 100 lines).
Per the docs*, not completely telemetry-free, yet an admirable attempt.

* https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium/blob/master/DOCS.md
I've been building FriendApp the past year. The core feature on iPhone right now is to just group people into lists, and preserve messaging integration with whatsapp, text etc. Trying to make it super simple. Also has ability to sync for recent contacts list. Would love feedback, and thoughts on the next features to iterate on.

https://www.friendapp.com/
2023 Technology Predictions Report [pdf]
Malacca Strait: How one volcano could trigger world chaos
It's a common accessibility requirement. For example, WCAG suggests limiting the max width of blocks of text to ~80 characters (40 for CJK).

https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#visual-presentation
Any Credence? The Dude would abide.
I launched my startup May 1st 2021. And yes COVID was still very much in play.

My thinking was if I can survive in the lean times, I can survive in the better times.
The short version is that overlapping maritime borders are resolved by drawing the various buffer zones out from the shoreline of all coastal land of each country, and where they conflict take the approximate midpoint of the overlapping area as the border.

Small islands can therefore have an outsized impact on extending the territorial waters of a country, which is why there are so many territorial disputes over seemingly-insignificant uninhabited islands.

There's not always an unambiguous resolution to competing claims, see for example:

- China's "nine-dash line" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine-dash_line

- The Israeli–Lebanese maritime border dispute (which was only resolved last year) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli%E2%80%93Lebanese_marit...
In before the cease and desist from Salesforce
(almost) general processing unit
Disabling all notifications during the day was a fantastic life improvement for me. I had a period of time in my job where I struggled to get into the projects and had zero passion for what we are doing so it was easy to get distracted. Throwing myself into my work for bursts at a time with zero distractions actually brought the passion back as I felt more invested.

I have a period of time in the morning when I'm usually catching up on emails, drinking my coffee, browsing HN, etc and a period after dinner but before bed where my notifications are on. Any other time, call me twice and I'll answer.
side channel attacks attack the other side of the specification approach from glitching attacks, where the product is allowed to perform anywhere within the specified performance range as long as it's operated under nominal conditions

i think this is a much more feasible thing to defend against than glitching attacks, though still difficult for similar supply-chain reasons

what you are describing is, in my book, a glitching attack, not a side channel attack
I enjoyed reading this a lot. I think there is a lot of wisdom here. You dont have to follow everything to the letter, but there is something deep to learn in each point.
MOOC video production affects student engagement (2014)
CPU-addressable RAM is not interchangeable with graphics card RAM, so unfortunately this strategy isn't quite in the right direction.

AFAIK it flat out won't work with the DL frameworks.

If I'm mistaken please do speak up.

Edit: Thank you JonathanFly, I didn't know this!
I laughed when I read this but then I thought more and... wouldn't that be fun? Like, if it's their hobby and they're good at it, why would the date be bad?

Gardeners like their plants to grow big and healthy. Fishkeepers obsess over the health of their tanks. Musicians want to play more challenging music with better bandmates for bigger audiences on higher profile stages.

So if you were on the receiving end of a date orchestrated by a dating hobbyist, it'd be fun, probably unusual, definitely well organized. There are worse things to experience while dating. And, just maybe, you make a connection and form a relationship. But even the base case isn't _bad_ per se.
currently solved in 3 dimensions; 8 should also be "easy".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tornado_potato
"Some varieties have spliced sausages in between"
> sells cloud hosting to pay the bills, standard protocol with self-hosting option for the server like email/browsers agreed upon decades ago, anyone can create an interoperable desktop/browser/mobile client. Fully encrypted such that even the non-profit doesn't have the decryption keys

All of those are true of Bitwarden, except for the non-profit part...

> Or you could charge individual users $5 a year to cover cloud costs

And who pays for the development?? Bitwarden already charges only 10€/year, so they're basically doing exactly what you're proposing, but paying for development with VC money.

Even if servers were literally free (they're far from it!), do you have any idea how many users they'd need to cover just the minimal amount of developers, one business person and either an in-house or external security auditor? And who would pay for all of that during the time it took them to build up that user base??

I hate the VC culture as much as the next guy, but unless the founder is already crazy rich, you need external capital to start up any large decently company - or even a non-profit.
you have to add table support yourself.
But doctor, I'm not good at anything!
Yeah Stable Diffusion, Midjourney and the ilk are going to automate away some of the art jobs, or at least some of the workflow involved in art (concept art etc)
Research and CVEs
There is no problem in organization. What matters is who controls an organization and how it works. A corporation is just an organizational entity. It can be run in many ways. It does not have to be organized and run like a privately owned capitalist corporation.
> Even worse, I’m gonna be judgemental.

Apples of gold in settings of silver. Judging has value, but must be balanced - often by a virtue such as love. Source: Book of Proverbs (aka another source of techniques for judging character and other such secrets).

Not sure if this was intentional, but sections about treating people who cannot repay seemed to me to bundle love and judgement together well.
But also: don't use your distro provided version of Rust. It's intended for compiling distro packages that depend on Rust, not for developing with Rust. Get Rust from https://rustup.rs
I love that board! I have one that's very much in the same spirit as "kludge.2" (and also red, for the same reason they describe), but the first (Gemini?) board made me realise I need to up my silkscreen game.
We should make fixing that a priority.
Fantastic - thanks Simon, much appreciated.

Yes we generally like the AirTable UX, too, and it’s a good fit for client-facing stuff in addition to internal tooling. It is slow, though, and there are no native desktop or mobile clients. Mainly, though: building a business on it comes with all the usual pitfalls of VC-backed SaaS.

It’s very helpful to hear your thoughts on the project’s trajectory. We’ll take another look at DS and the auth0 module, thanks. It looks very promising and we don’t mind a bit of assembly.
The problem with dating is that we enforce a 1:1 relationship while nature encourages 1:N. Am I the only one seeing this? or we shouldn't talk about it to not risk getting canceled?
>> I don't need a header to follow me down the page, in fact I'd prefer it not to.
> I find the persistent ToC to be very helpful

This sounds like the perfect application of customization. Why chose one, when you could have both at nearly no cost. :)
Name and shame the car company - this must have been a hyundai or kia (KN).

Those companies have been in the news for having easy to steal cars due to leaving out cheap and completely standard on all other brands anti theft stuff just to save a few bucks.
The term "nonprofit" is rather weird. It means that the organization doesn't have shareholders, so no person owns the money that the organization doesn't spend.

Salaries are a common thing that nonprofits spend their money on. That table shows some very comfortable salaries, but not at all out of keeping with an organization that size. There are many larger nonprofits with much larger salaries: a number of health care systems are incorporated as nonprofits, and their executives get well into the tens of millions.

You also get organizations like MITRE, a billion-dollar federal contractor that pays million-dollar salaries to its C suite. I'm honestly not sure how that's legal. The health care firms are dubious enough.

Still... the idea is that they're not trying to earn a profit for shareholders. They don't pay taxes on their profits because nobody owns that money. The employees who earn 7 and 8 figure salaries, they do pay ordinary income tax on that money, as anybody else does.

I really don't know how much actual work Wikimedia does and whether it's spending that $88M well or badly. But I can say that it is in keeping with the American tax system's use of the term "nonprofit", which is not really what people expect it to be from the word alone.
(author) Not sure, I still haven't finished cataloguing everything yet! I might make an addendum to the post once I've finished that process with a more detailed breakdown of what's included in the collection.
> Can someone chime in why this hasn't worked in the past?

Because spreadsheets and notes are free and good enough.

I used to be a full time shitty cheap car flipper. I used to be single. They're about the same level of communication work. The ROI of a proper CRM isn't there because in both cases your customer is just not that serious about the interaction when they're in the part of the funnel a CRM helps you with and even then it doesn't really help you with the bulk of the customers, it helps you with the long tail. When you're a one man shop squeezing out an extra 1% or whatever a CRM gets you isn't worth the time vs focusing on other areas. (These days I work in a client facing role with a proper ticketing system and integrated CRM so I do have something to compare to.)
I'd love suggestions for PHP.
I've been working on FriendApp the past year. I think it hasn't worked in the past because the average person doesn't realize that they could really benefit from this solution. It hasn't necessarily felt like a burning problem. I think it has to add some value beyond just classifying and adding additional metadata to contacts.

My goal is to develop features that also facilitate sharing of activities, upcoming events that I'm attending that I want to share with people I know. Things I want to do, and making that visible to select groups of people.

Hope you'll check out where we're heading
https://www.friendapp.com/
Are the police officer's legal claims true?

Surely, if the records are themselves stolen, the original owners would be entitled to have them back.

If they weren't stolen, does the thief forfeit ownership of them through the mere act of putting them in a car they stole?
> You also get a ~200 mile EEZ for fishing and mineral rights, and a 6-12 mile territorial waters in the area as well.

You don't get those for artificial lands or for insufficiently substantial islands. And an international arbitration under UNCLOS already ruled against Chinese claims in this regard.
Totally agree. Call it "Funnel". Which is gross and puerile on one level but not, like, violent.
Cemetery technology provides new ways of memorialising the dead; yet caution
Yeah, but sequential charging will eliminate that and reduce the fleet owners costs.
He won't answer because he's following OpenAI's criminal footsteps.
Because Vim is better than Emacs.
I don’t actually think you responded to anything I said, instead responded to a strawman about elite politicians, generalised your circle of friends to a whole continent (there have been polls on the support you know) and finally made the dubious argument that warm feelings towards Ukrainians don’t count because there are other things happening in the world as well.
> Yes, absolutely (note I don't actually know how to get the encrypted version of the vault standalone).

I believe that, given that it's just JavaScript in the browser, that the encrypted vault should be available as a blob in one of the network requests when you are making a change to the vault.

> Are you willing to send banking information over HTTPS? It's the same level of security.

Maybe I'm being irrational, but I just think there is a fundamental difference in the risk profile between a breach of my banking credentials and having every stored set of credentials across my entire digital life exposed through a password vault breach.

If my banking details were compromised somehow, I at least have a bank I can work with and real people I can talk to. Both the bank and myself have a strong mutual interest in addressing the acute security issue. Government banking regulations come into play. Insurance comes into play.

If my password vault is compromised and credentials for every service and website are exposed, I would argue that is a far graver matter. And who do I turn to in that case? I have to imagine that any of these password management companies would just point to me being somehow negligent with my master key and tell me to pound sound.