skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And answer from the new version:

> After using 10 chairs, we have 19 chairs - 10 chairs = 9 chairs in the room.
Then after buying 9 more chairs, we have 9 chairs + 9 chairs = 18 chairs in the room.
So treat them like first class members of society then.
Ruby was the prettier and more consistent language that was slow, prone to weird regressions, and a huge pain-in-the-ass to put into production compared to Python.

Ruby metaprogramming made for some write-once-read-never codebases.
I'm not sure how you would enforce a bad on someone without also having a similar or realistically bigger fleet.

But if you say there will be multiple people with big space ship fleets - sure, that's cool too!
And the next one is easy to get to by train from my current location. That's great (I don't fly). Nice.
True, I would also add that a major contributing factor to the danger of the group B era was absolutely horrendous race organization and scheduling, creating dangerous situations for competitors and spectators. Most notably and tragically at Portugal in 1986. While Gr.B cars required great skill, the danger of the cars themselves was perhaps overemphasized by Jean Marie Balestre's FISA to direct blame away from their own organization and on to the manufacturers.
Which version are you using? I'm on "ChatGPT Jan 9 Version", and not only it got right, but also why someone would (incorrectly) guess 18. See edit above.

But of course, there's an initial entropy to the models, so it's very possible that depending on the initial state it converged into the wrong (but yet probabilistically plausible) answer.
Star lifting! :D

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_lifting

https://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/47897e8b1947c

https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02338
The trick is that you can get a loan to pay the jeonse deposit. The interest rate for jeonse loans is considerably lower than for a regular mortgage, and until recently even lower than paying rent, because these loans are effectively guaranteed by the landlord who is contractually obligated to return the money.

So if you simply wanted to live in a certain area for a while and not get tied down by the legal burden of ownership, getting a jeonse loan would have been a steal compared to a regular mortgage or even renting.

My first jeonse deposit was $90K, $60K of which I borrowed from a bank. Interest on that loan was less than $150/mo. Rent on a comparable apartment would have been upwards of $500/mo at the time. Of course you can't get this kind of deal nowadays, but the scheme made a lot of sense when it worked.
Right? The conclusion is quite suspect because the Mongols eventually did conquer southern China where it is perpetually warm and humid. What they ended up doing was solidifying their control of northern China and then adopting infantry based tactics and riverine warfare in addition to adopting trebuchets from the Middle East/Europeans. The Mongols were quite adaptable. I doubt warmer weather would be enough to stop them on its own.
"Horde" - a term long used to deflect the sophisticated tactical, strategic, technological, and governmental methods of the Mongols. Their accomplishments are not lost on the war colleges of the west (at the the US for sure, especially the US Marines), but no one else seems to know this.
Well, not to spoil it, but not exactly. In the books and show, which are both fantastic, the characters flinging rocks are not other Earth nations; they live in spaceships / space stations / small moons beyond the asteroid belt, for the most part. The asteroid attacks on Earth are indiscriminate, not targeted.
if you used the thin wire on both sides you'd get the same voltage but experience more losses

if you used the thick wire on both sides you'd get the same voltage but have a much heavier and more expensive transformer for an almost undetectable performance improvement
The thing is, it can be both stress and revelation depending on how you look at it. Part of 4000 weeks is a chapter that is called "Cosmic insignificance therapy" which goes along the lines of nothing we do really matters in a grand scheme of things.

Again, depending on how you see it - it can be both shackling but also liberating.

The both of extremes of:

- I want to put my head in the sand and ignore the reality (we are mortal)

- YOLO

are not exactly ideal. As you said yourself => balance.
He played in a band at a RailsConf and it was one of the most charming nerdy things I'd ever witnessed.
Hey, that was intended as a pro-apple analysis.

The JPM deal was widely reported and isn't the same as the usual branded cards. I think Apple played them well, as so they should have.
Remembering Intel’s Andrew Grove, who sounded alarm against offshoring (2016)
> do not want to pay for Apple hardware that is usually grossly overpriced for its capabilities

This is the myth that just won't die even though every fair comparison of Mac hardware to available PC hardware, carefully matching feature for feature, reveals prices within $100 of each other. What you don't want to pay for is the features that you're not interested in, such as perhaps Thunderbolt ports.
The good old AirPort Extreme runs on NetBSD.
Does it lead to anything good if you will not stop it at certain point? Will you not end up with pure nihilism if it does not end?
No. You're looking for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment . Randomly impacting an asteroid of unknown mass isn't going to give you any accuracy.
You are describing "bad" programmers, and clearly there are no shortage of those.

But the advice in the post doesn't make bad programmers into good programmers - it just makes bad programmers "try to be clever" - which frankly doesn't end well.

Do some of these techniques help bad programmers _become_ good programmers? Sometimes yes. But then it should come with the caveat never to do it in "real" code. It might be a good learning tool, but it's a terrible production tool.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, hedonism gets a bad rap.
Having experienced cloud CI on several platforms as well as in-house installs of both Travis and Jenkins, I think the ratio of downtime between cloud and local makes the cloud a far, far better pick.

That said, I am currently very glad I'm not running anything on circle ci...
If the instructive content is invalid, you send a invalidation message. But if there's a violation of constraints, modern practice (both in and outside crypto projects) can do a pretty good job of precluding it, with test cases, wide review, multiple implementations, formal verification, and so forth.

And when something slips by, many eyes & many implementations make a consensus fix very fast. No one has 'fat-fingered' the major blockchains in a long time! Some proprietary/permissioned chains have had problems. And stuff as complicated as smart contracts can go awry in subtle ways. But NOTAM seems to be just a simple text log!

Distributed consensus inherently achieves one-source-of-truth without single-point-of-failure. As the notices relevant to individual flight-paths are inherently geo-local, with many independent submitters (like airports), any routing "through the FAA in DC" introduces risks – even if the FAA has final authority over who (which keys) can add entries.

Yes, Bitcoin's consensus state is relatively simple – but also far more compicated than NOTAM's even-simpler message. And continually redundantly verified & replicated by many independent actors & codebases, very successfully, for 10+ years.
Chickens are very efficient at converting bugs into human-usable protein (eggs). I think they're less vulnerable to the allergens on account of their higher body temperatures.
Good point. I don't mean to say that's the only experience one should use to judge. Though it's better than nothing, especially if one was the youngest or an only child.

It's also good to talk to a variety of parents. Ideally some willing to confide the less pleasant aspects. Because it can be years of painful sacrifice. And some find they cannot handle it, or wished they had made different choices.
A physicist is showing their friend the computer scientist a thermos flask.

"You can put a cold drink in it and no matter how hot it is outside the drink stays cold".

The friend is suitably impressed.

"But that's not all: you can put a hot drink in it and no matter how cold it is outside the drink stays hot!"

Now the friend is puzzled. "But how does it know?"

I long ago became depressed by the amount of code I've read that is written this way. Nowadays I just expect it.
a guy with oil on him
I do refer to them as "our children".

We need to build these robots properly so that they take care of us and make us feel important.
We've banned this account for posting flamewar comments and breaking the site guidelines extremely badly. This thread was truly awful, and you did the worst part of it. Also, this has happened before:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27463084

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28160079

If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
Tim Cook's paycut re-allocated to Elon M new hires leadership team for finding corporate synergies with the New Next Apple, Starlink, Twitter is a good problem to have.
I absolutely love this - it reminds me of the Monster 6502 project that recreated the classic MOS 6502 microprocessor but at the transistor level.

https://monster6502.com/

It looks like something that wouldn't be out of place on the deck of the Discovery One in the movie Space Odyssey.
I'm not saying this is the case here. This Doctor could be a total grifter... but all the same. I've noticed a trend where a person can get _one_ thing wrong and be written off as a "liar" or a "fraud" for the rest of their life. It's annoying.
Fantastic, it's below both of those values.
Python attracted certain types of folks who wanted to say quickly understand the latest output of the large hadron collider, about the size of life peoples let’s say. Ruby attracted live action role playing larger than life sage type of people. Seems people just about the size of life is what is needed to make languages flourish.
A lot to play with for the near future here with the resources of the solar system - think of all the unique cultures even just the early habitats swarms will spawn!

And even without major breakthroughs I'm sure some will try to go interstellar AI uploading, some form of hibernation or even a generation ship. Or Nuclear Salt Water Rocket at a couple dozen % of the speed of light, so the trip won't take more than a few decades, which might be doable with some decent life length ehnacement - possibly even a round-trip! :-)
You started a hellish flamewar here and perpetuated it so badly that I've banned the account.

Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34386829.
You might want to try to find some better sources of information than the ones you're relying on now.

The good news is, nothing in your second paragraph is true, that's all QAnon-style made up stuff, no different than stories about pedophile rings hidden in pizza shops or the Earth being flat. The bad news is, you probably need to find some new websites to get reliable information from.
For some people, the idea that death isn't a possibility would probably bring so much joy and relaxation.

Work would be more relaxing, knowing it isn't make or break, lol
Hopefully I'll see you there!

BTW what you say about the sadly common assumption Timnit and other AI ethics folks don't have "real contributions" is too real. It has impacted me even though my work isn't on AI ethics at all, just because I bother to talk about it online in public sometimes. Similarly for any social justice work or any work improving the work environment in research. It is like some people cannot comprehend that one can be technically proficient and still care about social justice and ethics and other "soft" issues. I love how confused those people are when they learn my expertise is in formal logic and proof haha
I think that people tend to forget that not all pixel art was produced for CRT systems. In a lot of cases apeing the past seems to be pointless or just badly done. It is rare to see a good scanline filter but it many cases it is not neccessary. Pixel art can look fine on a modern display.
I’d expect the opposite. It’s not very good at precise problem solving but it’s very good at writing verbose flowery bullshit.
Any bog-standard database might work. But if so, curious the FAA hasn't just done that: say, SQLite replicated across many places.

But the centralized team running it could still "fat-finger" it. Any "master DB" system has problems that blockchain-like approaches have definitively solved, allowing progress on valid messages when large portions of the usual maintenance systems have gone down or been compromised.
The thing that most makes this poster's life worth living is caring for an animal which was engineered to be pleasant to care for. And a lot of people use these animals to replace human relationships (I've seen it quite a few times, so blatantly) as they are simpler and more stable.
And the indictment is about society (in which human relationships are really hard to have for so so many reasons), not this poster, who has figured out a real cheat code to life and love (and more power to them)
Coming soon to Hackernews: An actual "Unix beards = toxic masculinity" study just like in Cryptonomicon.
For me it's gotta be all the ridiculously over the top VAs in the CD-I Zelda games.

"I can't wait to bomb some dodongos!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRDO3l1Eiuk
One way to counteract fading memory of events is to sit down and write a few thousand word diary entry when something great happens. Describe the whole experience from start to finish in as much detail as possible. File it away with the time it happened and an appropriate title. I've done this for great experiences in my life. I go back and read them on a regular basis.
Would hardware security keys protect from this? If you already have a session token on a site (and that site doesn't somehow restrict the session token to only being used on the machine that generated it? Which afaik isn't possible) then it's too late, yes?
gestures wildly at the world

Speciation happens anyways.
Personal attacks aren't ok, regardless of how bad someone else's comments are or you feel they are. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.
Nice legs and feet.. not.

https://storage.googleapis.com/thismodeldoesnotexist/photos/...

Impeccable URL, though.
ipython and numpy both predate rails

cpython has supported thread safety since last millennium, it's just slow is all

probably ruby, like lisp, is better for experiments to figure out what problem you're solving, but python (or, more so, golang or kotlin or typescript) is better for writing a maintainable solution to the problem once you more or less understand it

i think of python as favoring flexibility a bit more than i'd like, at the expense of comprehensibility and performance, but ruby is even more extreme along that axis

but probably random chance also plays a large role
Jeonse money is usually borrowed, too. At a much lower interest rate than you would get for a typical mortgage, because the landlord effectively guarantees that loan. Until recently, it's been much cheaper to pay interest on a jeonse loan than to pay rent.

Typical jeonse tenants start with savings equal to 10-20% of the value of the property. (To buy an apartment, on the other hand, they would need a down payment of at least 30-40% due to LTV restrictions.) They borrow the rest of the deposit from a bank. The landlord takes that money and adds their own loan to buy more houses, invest in coins, or whatever. So everything is leveraged at least twice. Of course this scheme all crumbles down when interest rates go up and property values drop.
> Okay. But Fredric Jameson establishes that in postmodernism we have experienced a weakening sense of historisity such that what is, what was, and what will be all exist as presents in time. 1970, 1991, 1992, and 2017 all happen simultaneously.

Okay with the postmodernism, but relying on a memory unsafe language to implement a server-side web framework in 1970, 1991, 1992, and 2017 is equally anachronistic. That being said much love to Forth! – Or, as the post-modern philosopher Slavoj Žižek is used to say: "and so on and so Forth".
Did sunburn exist before we damaged the ozone layer?

Have people been using various substances and mechanisms for sun protection for thousands of years?
We are perfectly adapted for a part of Africa and that's pretty much it. Without technology (which goes from igloos to central heating) we would pretty much freeze to death anywhere else.
Even today you'll see dangerous conditions in long distance desert racing due to unstructured roads and inadequate crowd barrierrs (for those that travel out to the dune whoops to see things go bad:

( Finke, not the Paris-Dakar )

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-0eTjCfVXs

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJfuZdymPes
If I could upvote this a thousand times, then I would. Bad management makes any development methodology suck.
Basically no change in it's orbit around the sun, it's gravitationally bound to a much larger asteroid.
Even during its time I remember finding the show unwatchable garbage. To me it was Zelda in name only.
I am not the MAILMAN, I am also a living organism and I couldn't care less about those goals. I don't deny that you might have them but they are hardly an automatic consequence of being a human, much less some more general "living organism". They sound pretty high level to me, especially the bit about "species" (whatever that might really mean anyway). Speciation is a human construct.

For all you know you are just running a program designed to transmit a message encoded in some "junk" DNA inherited from some long lost ancestor who was modified by some alien that crashed on our planet billions of years ago who hopes that some terrestrial decendent will eventually arrive at an inhabited planet where the residents will open up the astronaut, read the message, and come rescue your descendants to travel.

Robots will be our real descendants.
I just hadn't seen this wretched thread yet. I've banned the account that started it.

You, however, have also broken the site guidelines badly, and since we've warned you before and you've continued to do just what we asked you to stop, I've banned your account as well.

If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
What about Walmart?

Tons of "huge" companies die without a blaze of glory. IIRC the average lifespan of a F500 company was pretty short.
Yes because every company that is not using the cloud for CI/CD have much better security.

I’ve seen internal hosted Jenkins servers give up the ghost more times than I care to mention.
I miss OiNK all the time. So much music that wasn’t available anywhere else. Sigh.
Personally this type of thinking smacks of anthropomorphism to me. Plants and animals couldn't care less whether their descendants thousands or millions of years from now are wiped out. I don't object to NASA doing the research because I'd like to see humans preserved, but it has no special moral value, it's just us meddling with the fate of the biosphere for our own purposes, like we always do.
CircleCI's hack caused by malware stealing engineer's 2FA-backed session
It was most decidedly an inelastic impact. It is not a useful way to validate newton's laws giving the overwhelming complexity of the event.
Some people learn language primarily by sound. Most native speakers learn that way. They’re more likely to swap their/they’re or horde/hoard as for them the scribbles on paper are secondary.

Some people learn language primarily through writing - a lot of non-native speakers learn this way. To them someone making a their/they’re mistake is bewildering, but they mispronounce words in ways that seem strange to the sound-learners.

The two groups don’t under each other’s struggles and often look down on the other’s language ability.
is this on a preprint server or something anywhere

the website only wants to show me the abstract
>Coming soon: web browser in an OS emulated in your web browser,

That would mean a Nuclear War, most of Silicon Valley to be inside Exclusion Zone, and millions of refugees running for life off the coast of Australia.
You can have it call out to python or some other runtime to help with that. It just needs to be able to turn a problem into code.
I don't remember anything like that in Breath of the Wild.
1.4 Gy is enough time to make more fossil fuel, as it is a renewable resource on that time scale.
| Q: The room has 19 chairs. We are using 10 and then bought 9 more, how many chairs do we have in the room?

I don't know if you made this question up, but I think this question has issues (I as a reader find it meaningless). You say you bought 9 more chairs, but you don't say you put those 9 chairs into the room. Also you don't specify "we" own any of the 19 chairs in the room initially, but at the end you ask how many of those chairs "we have."
ChatGPT is an AMA, just that the responses are not shared.

Anyone can host an AMA on behalf of ChatGPT by just serving as a proxy for the questions and answers.
You're right that the main challeges are political & bureaucratic inertia. That shouldn't stop us from honestly & plainly describing its core, & the industry's state-of-the-art for similar systems that don't have the legacy system's encumbrances.

The "globally agreed-upon data format" is essentially text blobs with a standard set of abbreviations, that assist search/filtering by flight-paths & planned waypoints. It seems to be a mere 150MB a year.

The inherently "move slowly" modernization effort can only be helped by a clearer outline of what's now possible. This is too important to prematurely dumb-down brainstorming ideas, based on low-expectations for the adoption process!

And a modern architecture for distributed updates & reliability could trivially mimic the old system's pilot-visible outputs, to remain familiar to tenured personnel.
It's safe to assume everyone is motivated by money.
The mods didn't see this thread until a few minutes ago. The flags in this thread before that were from regular users.

I've banned the worst offenders in this thread, which were you and the person you were fighting with.
Site creator here! Thanks to all who spent some time reading and scrolling through. I’m happy to see such great discussion here, and gives me some confidence the excerpts pulled were the right ones to get the core ideas across.
It can easily do mathematic functions and SAT syllabus. Despite the word problems, by assuming ChatGPT should easily be able to solve simple arithmetic.
If you are still sitting in just the Solar System in a milion years, let alone thousand, something went horribly wrong. Or we got some interesting neighbors. ;-)
"reading/writing" is actually reading comprehension/grammar. the essay was optional from [####] until june 2021 when it was discontinued. so the ai isn't writing, it's answering "writing" questions which are grammar/sentence structure/correctness/etc.

also if you click the link, it was all multiple choice.