skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
But that will not get you a promotion or industry award if you are the designer.
> Me, but I aint paying $800 for it (if I understood the article correctly).

That's the pro model. The consumer version is half that.
I guess it would depend on what you're looking to get out of your car.

I only open the door twice - once to get in, once to get out - so a small nuisance like being harder to open wouldn't bother me as it's only a fraction of the time spent engaging with the car. However I have family members with terrible arthiritis who struggle opening car doors anyway, so it'd definitely be a factor for them.

I'm also not typically in a rush when I'm driving, so if the car is a little slower that doesn't bother me as much as whether I'm comfortable and enjoying the drive. Or even if the car was no more comfortable, but just looked better, I might actually feel some pride in it and that would give me a lift and result in an improvement to my mood. If my goal was to get from A-B as fast as possible though, then it absolutely would bother me.
Being a member does not give anyone the authority to define a standard. One can propose and vote.

Take the recent example for instance, Web Standards Body W3C rejects Google’s ad targeting proposal[0]

Browser market share calculation is always dodgy[1].

[0] https://tittlepress.com/tech/2238586/

[1] https://www.sitepoint.com/how-browser-market-share-is-calcul...
This sub thread isn't about disclosing _whether_ you work there, rather, your job there. You answered the parent's "a" but ignored the "b".

Your LinkedIn, in stark contrast to your profile and your comment, says Communications Manager and "I lead community communications in EMEA. You can call it marketing".
Running about 6.7 million dead so far, so there's little tolerance for fantasists. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Performance Tuning Tutorial Given at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
That’s actually a bad analogy in my opinion. People who don’t learn cryptography make many mistakes calling cryptography libraries and those mistakes can’t be uncovered by testing.
Cinnamon works for me.

KDE was buggy, unreliable and annoying when I tried it--admittedly some time ago. And the fetish for naming everything with an initial letter K: kindergarten stuff.

Too much effort on making every last thing customisable and not enough on making it work?
This already happens to an extent in existing ML pipelines. The ReLU activation function, is discontinuous in its derivative, and is one of the most widely used functions in neural networks. Its derivative looks like this.

if(i<0) return 0;
else return 1;

Now ReLU is continuous itself (as well as being monotonic) so it still cooperates relatively well with gradient descent algorithms. I think this is where the problem lies - not with differentiability itself, but with gradient descent not working due to the highly non-convex search space that such general programming constructs will produce.
Have a look at that one: https://bastardkb.com/dilemma
If you have to think about safety then the technology is unsafe by default, ergo not suitable for security and reliability critical systems. No amount of thinking is going to fix that.

I haven't built anything out of choice in a C derivative since the late 1980s, unless I explicitly wanted to break something or do something naughty or talk to hardware directly.
At least I could try writing something future-proof, in case this uncertainty changes. No one can be "entitled to" access everything they stumble upon. E.g. accessing restricted government resources is prohibited. I'm myself not a lawyer by any means, all I can do now is write something "Stop right there, machine scum!" in hope in the future this will do something.

Or we could agree on some industry standard for now, like robots.txt... which doesn't, of course, guarantee anything.

I wonder if EFF is working on something similar.
Remember when we were allowed to have fun on the Internet?

To me, the fact that corpos and their unbearable, sanctimonious servants are put off by this is the best possible feature, bar none.
I have to admit I never really learned awk, but whenever I want to do something that I think "awk would be god for this", I use perl. Are there things for which awk is a significantly better tool?
I understand what JWT is and I also don’t think it makes much sense to use them in a situation where you’re going to store them as is in the db. I’m just giving an example of what it could bring to the table if you did. Devils advocate and all.
Same here, and I'm in the process of excising Apple, Google. Baby steps in the right direction is all I need to work on.
XP, yes, but don't forget the service packs. Win XP sucked SO much when it came out initially. Just burned a lot of resources for seemingly no gain, and it was very unstable, compared to the previous editions we ran at the time. With SP1 it was much better, but that was years after it came out, 2001 vs 2004 I think.
I paid £250 for 5th generation iPod Touch in 2013. SONY's prices are way higher.
Scrollbar fix: edit /etc/profile.d/gtk.sh, add this:

#!/bin/sh
export GTK_NO_OVERLAY=1

Chmod +x it.

On theming: https://github.com/grassmunk/Chicago95

It works best with Ubuntu Mate. With Ubuntu Gnome it will work but not so integrated.
> They sold off the thinkpad business as non-core, and they sold off their commodity server business (x-series) at some point too.

In a sane world, they would be spun-off and let prosper as their own entities.

> Both hardware and software solutions have been de-emphasised in favour of 'services', and while that's fine in a business sense, it's so sad from the perspective of all that big blue has done for our industry over the years.

It looks like MBA philosophy screwing up everything by optimizing 'numbers' as if those numbers have no connection to real life. Very optimal in the short run, but catastophic irrelevancy in the long run. But hey - at least IBM shareholders got maximum returns for some time, and that's all that matters right...
How to Choose the Best Educational Toys for Your Kids
It can be difficult to pick the best kids educational toy for your child. With so many alternatives available, it's crucial to choose toys that are suitable for your child's age and developmental stage in order to encourage a passion of learning in them.
Collaborating with kids with lived experience of self-harm, clinicians at Imperial College London, and UX designers / illustrators to design an app that reduces self-harm in young people
Ad brokers and their clients are very sensitive about how their ads are displayed, and which content they appear next to.

To allow arbitrary third party apps to decide this would not be a sensible business decision by Twitter.
I disagree with the analogy. Need for repairs arises because of the natural decay. Tech debt is a consequence of the decisions made at implementation or even planning stage. It's more like forgetting to order a plumbing connector and using duct tape instead. Except in software there often isn't any forgetting involved and the actual connector is never ordered.
so who pays said investigative journalist's salary while they're investigating something?

It's not like they can produce an investigative piece every day. I would imagine they would take months to get one piece out. And what if the investigation goes nowhere? The journalist either must take on the risk of such a piece - and not get paid if it doesn't sell, or someone must bear the risk of paying before seeing the output.

Neither seems to be a good option.
Would be interested in art copyright too.
But honestly I have no idea how to prove that ML model was trained on my art.
The way you can't understand that, is the same way I can't understand why people would listen to Spotify.
> Living in Northern Europe
> internet availability

Implying that Germany is not part of Northern Europe.
I would amend that to say the fair use defense depends on the design of the model, but most of these companies are going for that type of design.
If you ask a pharmacy about off-label use of a drug, they are going to tell you "no", not to advise you how to take something you don't need. It might even be a breach of their license conditions to do otherwise.
News Corp fought Google mostly on their home territory of Australia, a battle which ended up with Google caving when News Corp succeeded in lobbying to get the law changed to be unambiguously in their in their favour (a battle AI providers should expect to face; the US isn't the only jurisdiction that's significant to them and legislation is bound to be updated for new tech). In France they got slapped with a fine of half a billion euros by an anti-trust court for not abiding by a French court order to agree fair license fees for news excerpts, and the EU's Copyright Article 13 is specifically designed to make platforms like Google News subject to EU-wide copyright law.

Google Images thumbnails were ruled infringing by one US court and overturned by another some time ago. More recently, the US also is the venue where Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams ended up paying the Gaye estate royalties and naming Marvin Gaye a writer because Blurred Lines was apparently the result of Thicke saying he wanted to write a song that sounded like Got To Give It Up, and Williams using his knowledge of songcraft and what was distinctive about Got To Give It Up's groove to compose an original song with different words, note patterns and beat which nevertheless sounded similar, so I'm not sure there's much grounds for the absolute confidence most HNers seems to have that fair use defences will prevail in the US because of novelty and "learning".

Copyright law rulings are all over the place, and I think it's quite likely creators of such tools will be ruled infringing by one court and overruled by another, infringing in one region and OK in another, one diffusion model ruled non-infringing and another more commercially-oriented one ruled infringing, and perhaps others where either the creators or the users of the tool are deemed infringing but not necessarily both.
Doesn't matter what DAC they have unless you're listening on the built in speaker, because you can't plug anything into it.
Thanks for sharing this. Wow, its a really suprising statistics to see 0 vuln found in 1.5m loc, even with Rust.
Can you please expand on

> Also using a dynamic language like Ruby for anything secure or safe sounds like a terrible idea

afaik, it depends on how you use Ruby right? I agree that using metaprogramming could lead to issues, but i would like to hear your view points on security?
Color LCDs were common on Windows laptops in 1998, and decent CRTs in late 1990s were quite sharp.

Pixelated rendering is closest to the design intent IMO.
Glad to hear that. Brian Kernighan said that he was thinking of updating the AWK book on numberphile last year. Looking forward to it as well :)
I heard good stuff about the Fiio players. Apparently they also run Android.

https://www.fiio.com/player
Sure.

- I can control it completely without looking at a screen.

- It's easier to put my mp3s on there than it is to do that on a phone.

- The battery lasts a lot longer than a phone

- It has a headphone jack

- No crappy software needed, it's just a USB drive as far as my computer is concerned.
Then they need to be that explicit in other places too for consistency. Technically 3rd Party cookies also allow the same (tracking your browsing history, and other "worst case" results), but do they present it that way to the user when the user starts up Chrome and/or loads up google.com?

Try analyze these things while wearing a tinfoil hat. Google wants to gimp extensions so that we're one-step further away from tampering with the precious data pipe that Google wants from their servers to the user's monitor/eyeballs. If it gets in the way of that, they will neglect it (whether purposefully or conveniently unintentionally like these seemingly benign wording).
I think what we all want is some kind of blackbox where data goes in and insight comes out. Ideally we would have something that takes a bunch of data and finds the shortest program that generates it. Unfortunately such a black box cannot exist, it is uncomputable. So then we need to ask for something less than that and we don't know exactly what that is.
Even you aren't identifying cause and effect though. Copyright postdates the printing press. Is it copyright or the printing press that led to the explosion in books?

Then if you look at technology like the internet, there's plenty of people creating things, not for monetary reward, but because they enjoy it.

Not that I'm necessarily on the same /page/ as the parent. I would defend copyright as a tool to enable new works to be created and allow creators to make a living, and ultimately get works into the public domain. As such I would limit copyright to a much shorter period.
Check out neutron?
Can't update without signing in.
YES BUTTONS !
(sorry for low quality post but it's been getting tough to find good hardware with buttons ...)
Please do elaborate before digging my own grave, thanks :D
> But then there's mobile Internet, chat apps don't have a status box anymore.

I wonder why this is the case.
https://archive.ph/upoNg
The thing is, from the POV of both Google and the user, there is no reason to assume a typical extension doesn't do the worst-case. The browser is just too juicy a target, and it's way too easy to make money on user surveillance / data exfiltration.

People rightfully point out that if you have access to current URL, you technically have access to browsing history. The right approach is to assume you will use it, hence the warning. Unfortunately, the only way to prevent this is to ensure the extension never, ever gets to make a networking request on its own, or populates any field that could become part of a network request triggered made by the site, or another extension.

It's a trust issue. It's not just fear that you might theoretically sell your extension to some unscrupulous third party. I don't know you personally. I have no reason to assume you are not an unscrupulous party. At this point there is, like, four or five extensions I trust enough to use, and it's mostly because they're OSS and it would be frontpage news on HN if any of them deviated from the expected functionality even slightly.

Having much finer-grained permission system would help a little, at the cost of making it incomprehensible to most users; there's a limit past which it's too complicated to be useful. We need actual innovation in the trust space - by which I don't mean crypto zero-trust shenanigans, but rather a system in which I can trust that, should the browser extension or phone app turn malicious, the vendor will be legally liable, and that it's actually enforced - thus disincentivizing malicious apps/extensions.
Health care systems turn out to be really easy if you exclude unhealthy people, yes.
We’re not ignoring 30 years of improvements, they’re just irrelevant because the statistics show that they are.

Sure write some more planned improvements, double down, that’s fine, but if you’re presented with the kind of history and data we’re looking at, would you bet on them?

The performance topic is hyperbole. We’re not talking about bounds checking - that topic is irrelevant and has well understood solutions in written systems. There are swaths of code now demonstrating direct competition in large practical systems and small benchmarks. Lots. The performance argument is so unsubstantiated it’s almost dishonest.

There’s an implication buried in here that there is some set of problems that only c++ can solve. I’d like to see those written down in a focused manner, just the problem and it’s c++ solution. We can take it from there to see if the problems are truly unsolvable with any other tool.
Paywalled; didn't read.
Very interesting, would be nice to have a switch to change the notation (at least the solfeggio/solfege one). I'm European and really I can't work with C D E F G A B.
Why would the absolute population number matter in this context? More people overall also means more healthcare workers, and healthcare is labor-intensive, so that's where most of the costs ought to be.
I add them by hand to requirements.txt and I try to keep it as minimum as possible. Yes it makes it not 100% reproducible, but it forces me to think about each dependency and I can see in my git log why it was added.
That part was a quote from the NSA. He didn't omit it. But I agree his argument would have been stronger if added to the list the most realistic C++ competitors and differentiated against those instead of the more dynamic languages.
basicly any fiio will do. But often a good dongle will be enough if you only got basic in ears. The amps are helpful for headphones with higher impedance rating and therefore need more oomph on the line to make them move.
> Whether that learning comes via ML, or a real flesh human brain, i think, makes no distinction.

You think. Others disagree. It has not yet been tested in court.
Where is it? Can't seem to find it.

EDIT: found it.
Anyway, didn't read the article. I think paywalled submissions should be banned.
Proper capacitors certainly help. Bass is a big dollop of energy being delivered all of a sudden - being why you can see the speaker moving. That energy has to come from somewhere and it's just one of those things that if you shortcut it, you can tell. Similarly you can tell if speakers are in shitty boxes. The combination of the two leads to those "home theatre" things you see in shops that make a loud "splplplplpl" noise when something explodes on screen. Yuck.

Other than that, I think it's mostly bollocks. I think a disappointingly large proportion of it can be summed up as "don't cut corners" which is why hifi gear from the 70's can still sound nice. If you replace the capacitors.
Apple's own 3.5mm adapter is actually pretty reputable in the audiophile community for being a surprisingly good DAC. If it has enough output power to drive whatever you use, you don't need anything else (the cable is pretty thin and fragile though, might want to get something else if you care about that)
>But let's not pretend it's apolitical.

I'd rather say that corporations are amoral, not political. They are only seemingly political to the degree that it benefits the business the most. On a broader scale, you can observe that they behave differently in different regions, and behavior also differs on a larger time scale, often molding to the current times.
Is Fortran easier to optimize than C for heavy calculations?
A lot of code broke on Java 9, but that had little to do with Jigsaw (accessibility remained unchanged from 8 until JDK 16). Code broke because it was not portable and relied on internal implementation details that then changed. Still, Java 8 is now a minority (most applications had to upgrade their non-portable dependencies to new versions).
Really not a fan of awk. It really looks nice but I have inherited a lot of it in the past and know how many foot guns there are. Trashing the unix philosophy of using text as a communication protocol, I've seen terrible terrible mistakes when it comes to repetitive re-parsing stuff at each pipe step.

The finest was a 3rd party who accidentally added a space in a data feed. This was dutifully sucked out of their SFTP server via a bash script, pre-processed using awk into the standard internal format and then picked up by a cron job which ran a python script to inject it into postgres. The outcome was of course that the columns were offset by 1. This caused a huge asset valuation dip and some market alarm.

A proper parser would have rejected the whole dataset as the data row could not be parsed.
Rust is definitely not a drop-in for C++, be it for interop with massive C++ codebases or developer adoption. You may be able to get your devs to switch, but your productivity will suffer so much that your stakeholders will be on your ass to figure out how to fix something there is no fix for: the mental load of Rust is a lot higher than C++'s and it takes a long time for regular people to become as proficient in it as they are having written C++ for 15 years.
20 percent of all prescriptions are written for uses not approved by the FDA.

https://www.drugwatch.com/health/off-label-drug-use/
Not sure safety can be improved with new guidelines of how to avoid common safety pitfalls.
Electric Vehicles Would Benefit 90% of US Households
Oh, it'll all be great when ChatGPT writes all that code for us and we can be off somewhere having a beer and a cry instead.
Time to study the classics: Vintage tech is the future of enterprise IT
Ruby uses C underneath, so if there is an implementation issue of how C is used to implement a feature in Ruby, it could still lead to issues.

But most of the ruby language is tested at trunk by the big companies like shopify, github etc to patch any issues.

I largely agree with this though:
> even “safe” code (in any language) will have to call traditional
C or C++ code or be called by traditional code that does not offer specific safety guarantees.
Show HN: DevClad – A social-workspace platform for developers
DevClad[https://devclad.com] is a social-workspace platform for developers to team up on projects and hackathons seamlessly.

It functions by matching you 1-on-1 with a compatible developer every week :)
I just cringed when I saw C++ and safety in one sentence. This is good statistics to showcase gut feeling, thanks.
If they're restricted than how did a data crawler find them?

But that doesn't matter. For this topic we only care about the materials that are intentionally published to the open web, and the different ways those materials can be licensed.
Would you support a copyright term where fees increase exponentially then?

'worthless' copyrights could expire after a year. Copyrights after 50 years can be maintained for X million?
>Thus, a simple solution to grading-related bias is for students to write their names at the very end of any test or assignment, so the grader only knows their identity after scoring the work.

So the scoring should happen before reading to the end the test or assignment?

And I would be curious to know what would be the simple solution to prevent the grader to peek at the name anyway ...
The target market is people who want a device with a headphone jack, an SD card slot and a good DAC. The number of phones that include these features nowadays is small.
Governments that implement these type of policies might see a rapid rise in their GPD. If it works out, I assume others would follow.

But what country would be the first one to take the leap?
Perhaps humans are well-defined, but are the OP's requirements so well defined? If I train a chimpanzee to complete `foo = "` with `bar"`, is that in the spirit of the OP's wishes?
Do you have links on novel hardware architectures for neuromorphic hardware? In my country , the leading research group for neuromorphic computing does not cite any novel hardware approaches, only what existing hw architectures are most suitable.