skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm thinking of curating a list of curated lists of interesting technical articles. But I'm worried someone else already did this, because then we'd need a list of lists of lists and we all know what would come next.
If you want to distribute FLOSS apps without cost, do so on platforms that support it, or look at how jailbroken iDevices can have apps side loaded.

If you want to distribute Mac apps you don't need a Developer ID. You can literally control-click (or right-click) the app and click Open, and you'll be given a warning asking if you're sure, as it's from an unidentified developer -- simple.

It's not a "problem" -- it's a choice.

If you want to distribute Mac apps without having to have an FAQ about Gatekeeper, suck it up and pay the $99.
Kiwixotherapy: Working therapy for introverts suffering from sleeplessness
What to Do When Your Electronic Device Gets Wet (2012)
Come join us at Upmortem. We're working on an AI slack bot. We cut all the nonsense out. No stand-ups. No people on call. Just pure development. Email me at [redacted]
Does Sapling offer any benefits over https://pijul.org ?

Edit:
Ah, it's git compatible. Eh. Step in the right direction I suppose, but…
>There's no evidence to support this assertion

Like all your other assertions this one feels self serving for your point of view when a rudimentary google search provides references to the alternative.

Consensus on efficacy of lockdowns flattening the curve with relevant bibliography.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02823-4

N of 1 as in what worked in Sweden (ranked 3rd in the global healthcare index and has a population lower than some cities in india) does not in any way shape or form meaningfully imply what would be good for the rest of the world (though it might certainly inform it)

I wasn't referring to the presence of fake/false/sensational/agenda driven narratives or your allusion to them, I was referring to your following offhanded assertions.

" Lockdowns were there to reduce the secondary consequences from running out of capacity.

That was the claim, certainly. But as we predicted, this never actually happened anywhere in the world - not even in places where people live in poverty, and healthcare is virtually non-existant."
meant to write "hundreds OR thousands of upvotes" here
The 'Wood-block paving' I know of as wooden cobbles. Iron-shod horses apparently made a lot of noise on stone and IIRC experiments were done to reduce this, the best results being from using wood not stone for cobbling. So it was a noise reduction thing in essence.

One of my locals is a coaching inn that goes back centuries. Where the coaches would have entered is covered by the building above and under that, where people now sit and drink, there are still wooden cobbles. I doubt they're from the original horse-time (which is only a century ago, or less), but there they are.
Not the person you're responding to, but this is one of the more egregious examples that comes to mind, from the Director of the CDC herself:

"Our data from the CDC today suggests that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick, and that it's not just in the clinical trials, but it's also in real-world data." ~Dr. Rochelle Wolensky[1]

This was a lie, and it was not only repeated but amplified by those in positions of authority up to and including the President of the United States.

[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/cdc-director-data-vaccinated...
This is technically correct and totally naive.

> If we get to the point where that becomes the case [...]

Then it will be far too late to do anything about it.

You're obviously going to be convicted of speeding if your geolocation data shows you going 80mph for an hour on the expressway, right? Do you really want to wait until this case shows up in court to try to prevent this kind of dystopia from emerging?

See the current top post about individualized suspicion.
Tips for writing Bicep files for Azure deployment
> The question is who gets the final say in how the child is cared for - if the parent thinks that something is harmful to the child, and the state says it's mandatory, who gets final say?

The state gets final say.

On most parenting matters the state has no opinion, or at least has the opinion "let the parent decide." But that delegation of authority does not mean the state has given it up. We the people have authority in the matter in how you parent your child. We will go to such lengths as taking the child away and raising it elsewhere if that is what's best for them.

People don't get to murder their children and get away with it.
That's not how the current administrative state operates. The white house can nominate the head of the EPA (and a layer of bureaucrats beneath them) and the Senate must approve the nominations. These are political appointees.

The white house cannot say "fire person X" who works for the EPA but was not nominated, because there is (supposed to be) a wall between the political appointees, who must be confirmed by the Senate, and the professional appointees, who are supposed to be protected by a web of laws and whistleblower protections.

So while many people think that the President is the "head" of the administration and can just order it to do whatever he wants, that's not how it's supposed to work. The set of things the EPA is supposed to be doing is set by legislation and the manner in which it does things is also subject to oversight. That doesn't actually stop the politicization of these agencies -- e.g. the CDC studying racism as a public health crisis or gun crime as a disease, or having the IRS investigate conservative groups, etc. The boundary of this tug of war in which the President tries to order an agency to do X and his opponents sue him saying "you can't do this" is exactly the issue of lawfare and the constitutionality of various executive orders. Many such attempts at directing Federal agencies fail or are ruled unconstitutional, but the overall effects of appointing ideologues to leadership positions is felt in things like the newspeak so common now in public announcements.
HN would need a system to categorize stories. Maybe tags like "privacy".
Non-technical end users won't want to be trying to enter Terminal commands they don't know or understand, and they shouldn't have to.
But this is not correct. The AI exist because it was stole the work of the original artists (and combined them somehow). You argument is correct if the AI could come up with an original work which would compete with an artist. But the AI work is not original.
This would have been a completely unattainable amount of money as a high school student. In college, that money was better spent on school supplies and food, and spending cash was short. After college it took me the better part of a decade to get to the point where $100/year felt like something I could feasibly consider spending and not risk missing rent in January.

$100/year is a lot of money to people in a wide variety of life situations. Being unable to afford this does not make them any less of a programmer.
Yes and no. These personalities are pretty basic, you really cannot add someone’s lives experiences in a 4K token limit.
Sony launches new Walkman 40 years after original release but it costs a bomb
Participation in the heat map and flyby features has always been optional.
I saw a documentary about LSD with Watts and a bunch if otger people, including A. Hoffman interviewed. What I wonder about is why do people who have consumed LSD or are into psychedelics exhibit all sorts of new age artefacts around their homes?
For a text editor mediocricity is fine. It has to solve many tasks for many people. It has to be shown that structural editing makes an editor simpler, faster and in suited for a broader range of tasks. Until then, text is the king.

> Yeah, but is it even good?

Yes, it is. Is the only solution which was able to replace several outlines + highly specialized solutions like OmniFocus for me. And that, being a simple text outliner. It has no point to compare it to some hypothetical solution which does not exist and may never exist at all. We need it here and now.

> and that's written in lisp.

It may be more of an artefact of the time when emacs was created than some intrinsic advantage of lisp in general. The way I see it, the advantage of emacs is that it is mostly written in the own script language. Would it be written in lua instead (a more common choice these days) not much would change as long as you can eval code on the fly.

> Or are you saying that Common Lisp itself is a problem?

I would not say that CL itself is a problem, but on the other side the lisp community likes to write essays about the perfect software in the sky but delivers mostly nothing. I cannot do otherwise than compare it rust, which is very young language compared to CL, but the community cranks out amazing and useful software on a weekly basis.

So, yeah, while in theory nothing speaks against amazing software being written in CL (as in any other language apart from brainfuck, really) in praxis it raises a lot of red flags for me.
How do you know if you have the right result though? You might know if you have a plausible result. Like if it output -1 then you know something is wrong I guess.

There's a much higher chance of detecting bugs that give plausible output if you aren't given the opportunity to say "eh looks plausible I won't bother double checking it".
Using this method requires admin rights though, but that’s probably for the better as running code of unknown provenance is probably a privilege of a machine’s owner
Why is SBF out of jail writing a bullshit Substack?
> First of all, I don't want another Emacs rewrite, much less in Guile. Mixing languages is not good for power-use, which requires ease-of-use, or at least conceptual simplicity.

This is a huge problem with GNU. Lisp is an extremely elitist language, and extremely divisive. It's not taught that well in GNU documentation either, in my opinion.

The least elitist language today is probably JavaScript. We already had Atom, and then things like VS Code, that make heavy use of JavaScript.

But does using JavaScript as the scripting language imply that the editor must be Electron-based? Surely you can have a thinner JavaScript-based app for desktop? And who cares whether it runs in a browser.
Museums and parks add new shades with color-blindness glasses
Not for Chinese suppliers.

Imagine being a billionaire and still being afraid to speak out about oppression because you would lose money.

https://twitter.com/alx/status/1598473176102600704
https://archive.ph/JShZU
MacOS has a native package structure that makes deleting things quite simple without the use of a 3rd party tool. Under what circumstance would anyone need this tool?
Infra/advertising spend divided by number of acquired customers.
i am more interested in that build your own redis in c/c++ book. hope there will be a hardcopy.
I use odd words. I wish there were an accumulating score where, if I type something, then undo the autocorrect, then NOT correct my typing, that the iPhone would just let me use my odd words.

Also: I've never ended an SMS with \nb\n...quit adding a B to my texts!

There has to be a massive population of usability folks (or maybe not, Apple seems to be big, but the number of times they sweep engineering attention from topic to topic makes me think the ones that DO the stuff are much smaller.) I'd LOVE to be able give feedback to Apple in a way that wasn't just 'throw a suggestion down a hole, we won't reply to you.'

I suspect there are some emergent behaviors that aren't immediately obvious as they continue to 'improve' the keyboard (for the first XX years I had an iPhone, it never added a 'B' to texts) and I suspect there was a push to go from a really stable, really well behaving keyboard to one that used the neural engine, because over the past two three years, the keyboard started to make language based suggestions/corrections rather than letter based suggestions. It's better, but it's still nowhere near as good as it was three or so major iOS versions ago.
The $65k (plus/minus bits and pieces) is then consequently also the cap on the additional costs of the self-driving tech and operations per truck. It's not necessarily obvious to me that we'll be there in the next few years.

Also, some of the easy use cases for potential self-driving tech have - at least in the US - already been put on rail which is in a sense almost a self-driving truck. In my view one of the major opportunities missing for making trucking more cost competitive and reducing the societal impact of trucking (emissions, road wear, less than desirable work conditions for truck drivers) is to move more and more freight onto rail. The US is quite good at it actually, but in particular Europe needs to get their act together on it.
For women who have not birthed at least one child, 35 is ancient.

For men 35 is nothing, men can sire children to their last breath.

Ask your friends who have started families past 35, so many stories about fertility, doctors, etc.

It is also why you see so many twins among middle aged professional couples, the children were the result of fertility treatments.

With the way society is changing, I think eventually human evolution will catch up and allow women to stay fertile later in life.
Even though I agree with you, I would like to point out that more experienced and stable parents could be enough of an advantage to balance the benefits of having younger parents. Especially for fathers that have already a settled career and more time to invest in their offspring.
A language that doesn't evolve is a dead language

Just like with English ;)

Discussions are great, they help shape ideas and fix misunderstandings

Swift about to get proper semantic for lifetime/ownership management, that's great, helps write better software, it wouldn't be possible if it wasn't an evolving language

It still is a young language and already replaced Obj-c and about to replace C/C++ at Apple
Please do! I have been looking for curated lists of good tech articles.
> This is the fundamentally flawed and misguided argument that can literally be applied to any technological progress to curtail advancement

Let's stop for a moment and define advancement (or "progress", as it's sometimes called). It's always tacit, and never explicitly defined, and I think it bears examination.

By advancement/progress, I'm taking the argument to mean "betterment". i.e. When we say "advances in science", we're usually referring to things getting better, as a result of more science.

However, science/technology are not good in themselves. They're just tooling. You need to stop and ask which direction you've taken this advancement in the tooling in, because whether you meant it or not, both advancement and progress have direction.

> Similarly, artists exist for their output for society. If these AI models can truly fulfill the needs of society that artists currently output (that is debatable), then that simply raises the bar for what artists are expected to output

I somewhat agree, and would say this is very much like when the camera was invented. Artists lamented that they no longer had a purpose, until they invented one for themselves with surrealism. Art shifted from visual reproduction to meaning and feeling.

Surrealism is then a good example of the direction that the advancement in science (of the creation of the camera) took. What is the direction that AI generated art is taking?
> A spokesperson interviewed in Marketwatch reiterated the company’s line: The beloved pasta’s “small size and star-shape require specialized production from a third-party manufacturer . . . [which] informed us they would cease producing Ronzoni Pastina effective January 2023.” They repeated the part about the unsuccessful search for a new producer, too.

Wait, but this pasta, I mean the Stelline, is quite common and is the same shape/kinda as other dozen of manufacturers, at least here in Italy. So why not just ask to another brand for another “specialized production tool/line”? Weird.
Not sure that tracks, because people tend to marry someone at roughly comparable attractiveness levels, all else being equal. If you're being mistreated and also presented with temptations, that doesn't sound like a stable situation.
In a more positive note: "Breaking news: Older fathers drive evolution!"
The undecidability property proven here doesn't imply that there exists at least one Diophantine equation for which we'll never know if it's solvable or not, does it?
You don’t understand because you’re blowing this way out of proportion. Most people can use the keyboard just fine with no problems at all and it keeps improving. Nobody is ‘crippling’ anything and nothing is ‘awful’.

It’s okay, it’s good enough, it’s much better than what preceded it, it looks like magic and it’s here, in a device you can hold in your hand.
It's not me mining the gold, time is. It's the best filter of all :)

Good luck with your project! I imagine you have to click through quite a few links to curate the site every day, hopefully it saves the effort for other people.
For me, personally, writing my own replacement server would be easier than cracking a binary client.
Edit: I knew the silent downvotes would come from people who are anti-drug and not willing to even try understanding another's experiences. I gave an honest description, but somehow an honest data point is unacceptable as it goes against what some people want to hear. If you downvote, please explain why because the issues of drug effects, drug value and (il)legalisation need a better discussion than what I keep finding on HN from a subset of people here. Please downvote for a reason, not because you can't accept what I say. <sermon ends, normal service will now be resumed>

---

Huh? Sounds like you overdid them big time. No offence but that sounds like a flaw in you, not the drugs (but yeah, that gets complex).

> The come downs became horrific (once you've done a lot of them, hangovers don't come close).

Double huh? I'm in a comedown from last night's E and... well, there is no comedown. As for 'hangover', I've never had one from E, ever. I seriously don't know what you've been taking. Maybe it just isn't your drug? Edit: it does sound like you seriously overdid it: "once you've done a lot of them"

All I can say is your experience has zero intersection with mine. I'm sorry what is wonderful for me didn't work for you.
We'll find out soon.
No way. It'd be ridiculously slow to constantly check for NaN let it propagate and then use a result or option at higher level.

Adding a branch like that to low level number crunching would be bonkers.
It can be an "egregious" amount to those in a variety of circumstances -- developing countries, students, those without employment, or living paycheck-to-paycheck as is... not everyone who is or wants to be a dev is making tens/hundreds of thousands of bucks per year.

GP says they're "Ex VKontakte, Telegram" in their profile though, which would imply they've made some money at least... and their comments read as more of an unwillingness to pay the $99, not an inability to do so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
A Man Behind Mastodon Built It for This Moment (2022)
Washing Machine Settings
Hyprland: A dynamic tiling Wayland compositor
Note that my advice, if followed, has the effect of giving the OP's engineers more space to develop efficient implementations than they would probably get if OP acts on their instincts.

This is not a coincidence. If you look at my own public work at e.g. https://github.com/chrchang/plink-ng/tree/master/2.0/ and https://github.com/grailbio/base/tree/master/simd , you can see that I play the role of the "not yet smart enough" engineer, not the manager.
Do Facebook ads work for you?
We've hired the best marketers to create Facebook ads for our website. Unfortunately, even after spending thousands of dollars, none of the ads produced a return. What we saw was a high bounce rate and less than 1 second spent on the site. We've spoken to many people about this, and they have similar experiences. We're pretty confident that the ads were setup correctly.

Do facebook ads work for you?
If I understand correctly, wouldn't a hash database of <just the training set> be larger than the actual model? (in fact by 1 or 2 orders of magnitude?)
I googled Upmortem and the first result is for "upmortem.com - Blameless Post Mortems: Upmortem" but page doesn't load due to missing DNS entries.

Don't know if this is your company, but it rhymed well with what you wrote here (no people on call) which I found a bit funny.
Thank you. Bias always needs a revealing.
I don't think that stuff affects presentation, does it?
I am a lefty and always used the largest phones.
What version of NTFS?
Modern rappers understand internet marketing so well
You can upload files to github with drag and drop. They are not mutually exclusive.
I bought a Shanling Q1 years ago and hated the stock firmware so much I never used the device. A while back someone added support for it to Rockbox, and it's finally usable.
Project Mage is an effort to build a power-user environment in Common Lisp
> How do I bypass the notarization requirement?

Why? As a software user I want you to notarise your software.
Stablecoin Volumes Now Exceed Mastercard, American Express and Discover
Only a fool would consider any drug harmless, obviously all (including MDMA) can have consequences.
HN is a bit of an echo chamber at times, but I still like it. I think with collaborative filtering though HN would end up a filter bubble and the users would be worse off.
Mine doesn't, I haven't accepted the user agreement that pops up when pressing the microphone button. Maybe it stops if don't accept it?
What you said reminded me of the bird video about withdrawal and habituation: https://youtu.be/HUngLgGRJpo (which of course may be biased in the other direction)

But that's my stance on drug use as well: It's pretty irrelevant how great your time is while you're on it if it turns your life into hell whenever you're not on it.
i’ve liked github actions for this. i used it on WebReducer (https://github.com/zekenie/web-reducer)
There have been cases where older women can still gestate a baby.

Here's a story of a grandmother birthing her own grandchild.

https://people.com/human-interest/grandmother-gave-birth-son...
Some of my two cents:

* I don't really see the value-add of a curated list of what is already a curated list. Down the rabbit hole...

* The site's definition of what is included and what is excluded is extremely vague. "general news", "unique views", "interesting stuff". I mean come'on...

* At least HN has a relatively excellent definition of what counts as acceptable content (relative to other social media platform's definitions, which are deliberately vague to allow complete hegemonic content control).

* If I had a buck every time someone said "Hacker News needs to be more hacker and less news", only to realize that their definition of "hacker" and "news" was very unique to them and so supposing that there should be some filter to "objectively make HN better" was actually very subjective and of little use as a publicly available tool.

IMHO, this should have been a private tool of theirs. They could have probably achieved their subjective goal of "more hacker less news" with a little script to filter out HN posts for specific domains and keywords.
minimaxir's "List of Hacker News's Undocumented Features and Behaviors" proposes something similar. https://github.com/minimaxir/hacker-news-undocumented#flame-...

But I don't know if this is based on evidence.
I don't want a small handful of folks - for whatever reason, we've gone with the economic martingales known as "billionaires" - deciding on behalf of society what problems are worth solving, thanks.
I think geofencing should only be allowed to establish/check connection to a very specific crime. I.e. in this specific case of capitol riot, it was a clear one. What I don't think should be allowed is a geofence & open-ended fishing for more crimes.

Obviously I am not lawyer, but I would think it could be codified somehow.