skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You don't know other people's life situations, even if you know their financial situations. My family consists entirely of terrible people who don't deserve my help. Any success I have is despite them, not because of them.

But even for people for whom that's not the case, you do not get to impose your morals on them. The idea of owing your parents anything more than you owe the rest of society is a nonsensical social construct that is thankfully dying out.
E-bikes are quite close to what you are describing, and are already remarkably popular.
Only the guy who revealed that transgressions were going on.
We went on several long trips with this car (600-800km), with all the bathroom breaks we didn’t really notice the charging much. Took maybe half an hour longer than with an ICE. And that’s with the first gen Ioniq, with quite low range. I bet with an Ioniq 5 we wouldn’t notice any difference at all.
Would you rather see it locked down to a single "open" platform?
> The reality for many of us who grew up in poverty and may have 'made it' to a greater or lesser extent is that our families are likely didn't. It's shocking to me how many M's and Z's don't see themselves as being responsible for their families. I find it highly disappointing.

You are saying this as you are charging rent to your mother? I have never heard of anyone doing that.
Relevant subreddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/dumbphones/
> May I ask what the biggest changes/ deal breakers were? It is difficult to understand the whys without knowing about the usage-pattern was broken. I'm genuinely curious.

KDE 4.0 was famously broken at release. It's not even missing features that was the issue, it was highly unstable and not ready for release.
The main reason I have stayed away from Python. packaging is a mess!
Did you really create an account for this useless comment ?
Finally, after 40 years technology has advanced far enough for C++ to have a print function instead of cout
The Amagasaki Derailment [video]
Dunno. In some places agriculture is fried with climate change at the gates so trying things to regain control over culture conditions could worth it. Could be useful also for keeping isolated varieties non contaminated with genetically modified pollen. Just in case something go wrong with that.
I see, it might be heavy handed but running them inside Docker containers might provide you with the isolation you're looking for. You could also build and share these images with your teammates.

I've actually started using a lot of different CLI tools with Docker, especially when the tool isn't available for my OS.
Totally agreed. Specifically, I can never get the “ants” that should show up when you select something. It’s an ongoing bug that was just never fixed. So I just have to remember that a thing is selected. Quite irritating.
That's fine. Getting perspective from different countries is useful.
What's so hard about porting to a new hardware arch? Why would building for ARM Macs be any different than x86? Unless you have assembly code it's just a matter of changing a compiler flag, isn't it?
I have a joint account with my parents. I have a recurring transfer that covers their living expenses go into the account each month.
Republican voters want whatever “get tough on crime” aligns with. “Repeal bail reform Derp Derp”

The “freedom” stuff is bullshit and narrowly scoped.
You might be able to make a better case that "we don't cancel books from the 19th century" if you'd used something other than Tom Sawyer as an example, which has been banned/censored at various times in the US.
The data being backed up is in tiers of importance or 'frequency of change', and based on this the backups are staggered, some daily, some weekly.

I wouldn't often go a full week without checking some file or other, so I think I'd know pretty swiftly if I got infected with an encrypting ransomware virus - hopefully quickly enough to minimise damage.

I also do off-site backups on occasion, so I could roll back to the last full set of off-site backups - so long as I remember where/when the most recent one is.

My main adversary I'm protecting against is hardware failure, however. I think I run a pretty tight ship in restricting access to data that I'd rather not lose.

Maybe some hubris payback will come visit one day though...
Not when going against it.

I wonder what range of velocities you can sustain and how close to planets (suns) you can come to catapult or slow down to stay in the system (starsystem) moving fast, and how many jumps for how many probes moving such fast would be needed to at least be able to pass by visitor/suspect at some point or time really close even if not matching speed or direction.
Windows 10, Firefox, ublock origin and Windows Defender

Dont install weird exe or MSIs

Thats kinda it.
Conflicts aren’t an issue. Multiple versions of a library can coexist and bundler will install/activate the requested version on a per script or project basis.
This github org needs more leetcode examples in that style
Ugh, I suppose you're right. They do seem to skip the beta pipeline for ITWs. I wonder if this has changed now that they're leaning on "rapid security response" patches for critical vulnerabilities, which betas do get, and so hopefully there's parity now. I should dig into this, pretty sure there were a few RSRs recently and it'd be neat to verify that a) betas got the same bugs patched and b) the RSR went out to beta and release at the same time.
This is fantastic. I didn't grow up learning music and found so much of it seeming arbitrary and incomprehensible. This really pairs well with a 30min video[0] I watched taking away so much mystery and showing 'patterns in the madness'.

It would be good if there were some keybindings to play notes (e.g. digits for I, II, or letters for notes ignoring #/b, or "r t y u i o p ["). A toggle to label the notes that are part of the selected key could help a beginner like myself.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgaTLrZGlk0
Beautifully written, great read.
As far as I can tell, the article says nothing about category theory and doesn't claim to. It's a popularization of recent probabilistic investigations in number theory, popularization of math is what Quanta does.

When it says "Mathematicians are taking ideas developed to study random numbers and applying them to a broad range of categories" I'm pretty sure it means category in the non-technical sense, category as in classifying into categories. The term doesn't appear again in the article.
I don't know if this work is particularly ground breaking, but this looks to be more concerned with applications towards number theory (specifically cohen-lenstra heuristics) rather than adding to the category theory literature.
If they had tried and failed I would agree it wasn’t that they had the chops. They wouldn’t even try. That was avoiding doing hard things in my book. And honestly, I fully believe they could have done it. And really, it wasn‘t actually hard, it’s change a data structure and do some data mapping. Hence avoiding actual work.
The extra energy comes from the electro. Electricity into acetate, then used as 'plant food'. As a substitute for the glucose perhaps?
They worst of them are referred to as the Censored Eleven, although you can easily find them intact (albeit, with a warning). It's not a complete list - others have been added to the list since, such as WWII cartoons with highly racist anti-Japanese charactures.

An example of one illustrates why the content might be considered problematic: "Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarfs". A contemporary review said, "A satire on Snow White done in blackface, set in modern swing, this is the best in a long time. It's very funny."

The "atrocities" include rampant racism, sexism, and other needless offenses with the intent of comedy. Other media of the time, such as Theodore Geisel/Dr Suess' wartime cartoons, often show up on these lists as well.

In my opinion, it's good that these cartoons are accessible, with content warnings, yet kept out of normal playback rotation. They're relics of an age gone, thankfully, past.
If you're giving $30,000 per year as a gift, you should definitely be paying for an accountant and you should ask them about what options there are for tax optimizing this.

There may in your jurisdiction be nonobvious ways to structure this kind of thing that would be advantageous to both you and your parents.
Yeah, my sense is that the author knows this is more of a neat trick than a "practical" way of calculating pi.

There's a bit on page 5 about how the Chudnovsky method totally blows this approach out of the water.
The benefits of subsidizing public transit are obvious: less congested roads, more economic activity, fewer cars polluting the city.

Free public transit is just the same idea taken to the extreme.
That makes sense. I am in my 70s and still work, but sometimes just in an advisory position.

As we get older it is important to have things to do, but perhaps better than lots of work is, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/putting-psyche-back-... :

“”Carl Jung famously said that a man spends the first half of his life building his external world, and needs to spend the second half developing his internal world. As we age, this truism becomes all the more important as our physical bodies and external importance inevitably diminish. Without a rich inner world to explore when the outer world has lost its allure (or our ability to explore it is diminished), we become like the cliche of the high school star quarterback whose peak in life was at age 18. If we can successfully navigate the transition from the external to the internal, we will discover that there are untold new territories to be explored that are richer than anything we found in our careers. And no physical or external diminishment need limit us in charting these new territories. Inner space is, I believe, the final frontier.””
https://github.com/chriskiehl/Deoplice
I am getting a ton of adverts for "Velma" when watching YouTube. My YouTube habit is exclusively mountain biking, woodworking and home improvement. I am not sure how targeted YouTube's advertising is but have come up with three theories:

1) Data sharing with Netflix (I do love Big Mouth)

2) Using the content I watch as a correlation for my age, and therefore susceptibility to Scooby-Doo nostalgia.

3) Wide net, no targeting. YouTube is just blasting these ads to everyone.

Nothing in the advertisements has piqued my interest in the show either. It looks uninspired.
You and your spouse can each give that amount, which doubles the number if you are married. Also if you go over, you need to file a gift tax form, but you would simply be eating into your lifetime exemption, which several million dollars before you need to pay an estate tax.
Well, it's currently a "must-win" for Republicans that's reasonably close, so first and foremost they won't be the ones to upset their chances at all. In the last election, it wasn't razor-thin like Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, or NC, but if the Democrats lose a few of those then they need the next runner-up like Florida. Florida was Democrat in '08, '12, and only lost by 1.29% in '16. With Republicans winning Florida by 3.36% in 2020, maybe Cuba's best chance is for Florida to actually be a lost cause to Democrats so that they go ahead with dropping the sanctions. Although, Democrats won '08 by 3% and still flipped the other way, so it's very possible to consider it fair game.

If true, I've discovered why voting for your opposite choice could be a valid option if you care about a specific issue like this.
Probably comes down to either inline assembly or dependencies, or both.
You said you haven't found anything relevant, the quick DDG shows there's relevant information for the USA, so I wondered how you haven't found that. Either you didn't want to write down all you found, or you really weren't able to find the good keywords to search for, or the things on DDG weren't relevant to you because maybe you're not in the US (you still haven't written down the country, all hail your privacy!). I could give you links to info for 2 European countries, but hey, for my own privacy I didn't want to reveal that info if they're not relevant.

Just like you're calling me an idiot, yeah, it's easier online to assume the other side is an idiot, and that's what I did.
I mean, just because someone is well paid doesn't mean they deserve to have money taken from them?

Every company has this as standard, but a lot have waived it for redundancies, so let's not let stripe off the hook.
Recognizing privilege or advantages or whatever you want to call it has nothing to do with guilt and everything to do with empathy and understanding of the world around you.

I find it interesting that many people would be quick to recognize a physical trait as an advantage (like are we that impressed if a heavy weight boxer beats a light weight boxer?) But someone recognizing that race, family money, good genes, or whatever as advantages is somehow "woke" and apologetic.

It's like we have a world full of completely self-unaware Kramers (of Seinfeld fame) running around. So proud and unapologetic about their karate prowess... https://youtu.be/7t8xwpW8gJQ
Asteroids.
Sounds reasonable. A warrant should be needed to query the data, but collecting it in the first place should be unrestricted.
It’s because air resistance is a much bigger drag on efficiency for an EV, so stop and go traffic is a bit more closer to its ideal efficiency (which is going slow without stopping).
Children taking responsibility for elderly parents is how society has functioned for millenia. It's a good system.
I suppose that could be an interesting thing to elaborate on. Do you feel like M's and Zs should feel responsible for their families any specific way?

I'm 30 and it's hard to see a future where I'll have any of the financial advantages they did. It's possible, if things go amazingly well, even though I make at least 2.5x their salary at any given moment (on the very low end for a software dev in general with >5 years experience)

I likely won't have kids, might not ever own a home, might end up homeless again, but everyone's situation is different.

Granted, they had kids accidentally, and screwed up their entire adulthood from day 3, but things seemed a little more forgiving because their parents didn't do that.
Yes, but the topic is security, not privacy.
I think we're agreed on (2)

For (1), I think it's handy to think of an encrypted zip file that contains a bunch of images. If you give it a valid password, it'll give you a corresponding image. If it produces an image that violates copyright, it clearly violates copyright, even if most of the images contained in it don't.

It's possible that if the model required sufficient instruction to reproduce Mickey Mouse ("create a line from (0,20) to (20,30) of thickness 2, then a line from ..."), and could not do so without that, then the argument wouldn't apply. And there's definitely a grey area once we're outside of the territory of reproducing images. But we definitely aren't anywhere close to that with these models, and looking at the "AI Safety" work, it doesn't seem possible to get these models to "behave".

> This would be a good thing but wouldn't prevent AI image generation from broadly doing the things that the plaintiffs want to stop it doing.

Yeah, I agree that the plaintiffs aren't suing solely because the model can easily regenerate their images. But I think we'll find its insanely hard to get these models to avoid producing copyrighted images. They may be forced to license the training images.
Responsibility is probably a socio cultural construct here. My perspective is one absolutely does have responsibility to their parents (exceptional circumstances aside), but I have noticed that as one of the major differences between north America and where I grew up (on both sides of the life equation mind you: where I was born kids weren't supposed to get jobs in high school or pay rent until at least out of university,and generally stay in their family home until they're ready to start their own family. Whereas my grade 12 in Minnesota, everybody was looking to get as far away from their parents for university as humanly possible, and those that didn't had to start paying in - whether rent or car insurance or something. So it feels like the social contract is simply different, even if it feels cold to me :)
It’s a bit annoying but you should be able to see in GSC what the ranking change was for particular URLs and queries by comparing before October and after October. You should also be able to see if the issue is whether the pages dropped in ranking or if some articles became de-indexed entirely. Take one of the page URLs that has dropped in traffic and make sure it’s still being indexed.
I've moved my discussion here, where it has gotten some traction
https://oldbytes.space/@bitsavers/109688913474142565
If anyone is interested in the plaintiff's argument, it is here [1]

Argument #1:

> The lower courts have mistakenly interpreted “publisher” to have its everyday meaning, referring to an entity or person in the business of publishing, and have at times compounded that error by insisting that section 230(c)(1) applies to virtually any activity in which such a publisher might engage, including making recommendations. But “publisher” in section 230(c)(1) is used in the narrow sense drawn from defamation law. If section 230(c)(1) is properly so understood, the imposition of liability based on a recommendation would not in every instance treat the defendant as a publisher within the meaning of that provision.

Argument #2

> the content at issue must have been provided by “another information content provider,” not by the defendant itself. Recommendations may contain information from the defendant, such as a hyperlink with the URL of material the defendant hopes the user will download, or notifications of new postings the defendant hopes the user will find interesting. The Ninth Circuit erred in holding that URLs and notifications are not information within the meaning of section 230(c)(1).

Argument #3

> the Ninth and Second Circuits erred in holding that section 230(c)(1) protects a defendant if it sends to a user content which the user did not actually request. A defendant is acting as the provider of an “interactive computer service,” and thus within the scope of section 230(c)(1), when it is providing “access...to a computer server.” A computer functions as a “server,” as that term is used in section 230, only when it is providing to a user a file (such as text, or a video), which the user has actually requested, or is performing other tasks (such as a search) at the request of the user.

Hey, Google may win this (I am pretty sure they will). But this claim that a loss would turn the internet upside down is histrionics. No, if Google loses, the internet will still be just fine:

> Thus, although some practices that might be characterized as recommendations could satisfy all three elements of the section 230(c)(1) defense, others would not.

> Search engines are in two important respects different from social media sites. First, search engines only provide users with materials in response to requests from the users themselves, and thus necessarily function as providers of interactive computer services. Second, although search engines provide users with hyperlinks embedded with URLs, those URLs are created by the website where the material at issue is located, not by the search engine itself.

[1] https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21-1333/247780/202...
Well, it also depends if you can speak a national language. Nothing beats getting chewed out by a Swiss cop for only speaking English.
> It's shocking to me how many M's and Z's don't see themselves as being responsible for their families.

Is it really so shocking given the vast generational wealth inequality in much of society today? In many families the previous generation who may have been working class and earning relatively little, are now property owners, having bought when housing cost far less relative to incomes.

A generation with property and pensions don't need support from renters on historically low wages.
How much of this is cataracts, and what are the other causes?
The headline should be blogspam/listicles because they are certainly not articles.
I used to work at this location when it was an active military base. The Army Signal corps made movies there long before Netflix. As a local resident its nice to see some reinvestment in the base a full 12~ years since BRAC was finalized and the gates closed for good. It’s a beautiful campus with proximity to the ocean and NYC. I do wonder what lies beneath that soil though…

https://tworivertimes.com/move-over-netflix-the-army-signal-...
GNOME became "the default" in large part due to the licensing uncertainty that has historically clouded Qt and by extension KDE. After that, it's been inertia.
> honestly I think before making the claim that Apple is sending specific document information to their servers, it'd be better to get something a bit more concrete.

I didn't make that claim, because I have not RE'd mediaanalysisd to know precisely what it's doing.

The strings in the binary suggest it does face and animal detection, and processes some sort of "blacklist". As I mentioned, I don't use Photos.app or iCloud so I'm not sure how any of my media would be eligible for analysis. I was literally viewing images in the Finder via spacebar QuickLook (not even in Preview) when it hit the network for the first time. Maybe it's downloading models? Maybe it's sending analytics? Maybe it's sending perceptual hashes? Who knows?

I'm hoping that this post causes someone with the time and skills to do an in-depth RE of the binary to take a closer look at precisely what is happening with regards to images that are not eligible for processing in Photos.app or iCloud.
A couple of notes:

1) I'm still on macOS 12.6.2 Monterey, with Little Snitch, and mediaanalysisd never makes any network requests (though it does exist and is running). So there may be something new on Ventura.

2) You can see the https request and response headers (but not the decrypted data) using this technique: https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/logging-https.html
My parents were abusive and negligent towards me though they have tried gaslighting my childhood. I don't gift out of a sense of duty but for my own conscience. My father is elderly, my mother is not in the best health, and I realize my time with them is short.
All loans, even between private individuals increase the number of assets in the system, because as well as the cash that changes hands, a new IOU has been created, and that in itself is an asset. If the IOU is in the form of a number in a bank account, and you include private bank account balances as money (as most people do), then bam! money created.

The magic status of banks just comes from counting private bank IOUs in the form of balances as money and not counting IOUs issued by private individuals as money.
It's nice sentiment, but studies have found that making transit free just tends to cause existing transit users to ride transit more frequently for shorter distances (instead of walking) but doesn't tend to encourage new users of transit.
> It's shocking to me how many M's and Z's don't see themselves as being responsible for their families.

Probably because most Z's are still just entering the workforce, and most M's have just began to earn decent money, because of the 2008-09 banking crisis. HN is not representative of the population at wide, so the sentiment you're seeing probably doesn't apply to people making $200k+ total comp.

> I find it highly disappointing.

Do you do anything about it?
Never saw this article before but wow is it a great read.
The problem then being that it becomes so over used and underfunded it collapses...