skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I legit considered not clicking on the link when I saw it on the frontpage, out of fear that I might actively contribute to burning someone's house down.
Mazda MX-30 R-EV revives the rotary
53k, and still up and serving pages nice and fast.
I switched to Iceraven [0] last year and never looked back. It is a fork of the new Firefox for Android but with a much longer list of extensions and about:config support. I specifically need the latter to route traffic through a local proxy before.

[0]: https://github.com/fork-maintainers/iceraven-browser

Oh and it is written in Kotlin. Maybe I should learn it just to try hacking more features in.
How CUE Wins (2021)
Using FF for both iOS and macOS and the features are different. For example there is turn on dark mode on the iOS app but not in their mac app. Their iOS app needs some bug fixes and UI polish,

But for me Chrome turns on my laptop fans more compared to FF.
> introduce Firefox Pro

If people aren't using the full feature browser today, why would they use it when it's not free?
Or for people with bad connections. If you expect high latency it can be worth it to embed js code to avoid the additoinal roundtrip. 10kb makes a big difference for that.
I suppose the optimistic view--such as it is--is that there is already a vast amount of low quality content out there that was created for pennies and plastered with ads and/or hoping someone will pay a modest amount. So I'm not sure that things like ChatGPT make things that much worse than they already are--and we can mostly live with things today. The pessimistic view of course is a whole new cohort of grifters decide to give it a run whether they ultimately make money or not.
I do this in effect. For things that don't rely on high core counts and memory bandwidth, advanced CPU or GPU features, or complex environments, I use a $150 Chromebook.

These new Intels are desktop CPUs.
They also have Performance and Efficiency cores. Ideally, they'd prioritize using E-cores, and only as many as needed to complete tasks within an acceptable period. In effect, though, they're not very smart, and you've got to get into overclocking and undervolting to get them into a state that resembles AMD's TDP-limited ECO Mode that provides 80% of the performance at 50% of the power.
Also, what is the relative sea level for this map - is it the same as the current one or what it will be like after the ice melts
What if this is news? We know that they were modeling this for a long time. We know that goals of companies are not always well aligned with what is best for mankind. This is my confusion, I don't see what this really adds to the discussion.
Actually, Zeno's argument actually was that it was impossible to move. He was a disciple of the earlier philosopher Parmenides who had argued the change if any kind was impossible and therefore an illusion. This was a hot debate in pre-socratic philosophy.
Ada adds cargo like package manager and repos, where is yours C? and C++. Please check out clibs and vcpkg|conan and pick some of them to standardize?
Isn't firefox also going to move to Manifest v3?
If you know (and like) Vue, look at petite-vue as an alternative.

https://github.com/vuejs/petite-vue
Gas stoves might be constantly leaking, but they only produce particulates when they are alight. Assuming you don't have an ancient appliance with a pilot light.
Yeah the best way to understand software (maybe even the only way) is to try to do something with it.
> Who wants to record typos or patch after patch in your private branch? That has absolutely no value.

A couple of years ago I wrote most of a custom X509 validation stack in java before realising we didn't need one after all, there was a way to do what we needed with the standard stuff, so it wasn't in the final PR. Three months later things changed, I did need one and being able to look it up saved me several days work.

It can have a huge amount of value.

Who cares about revision history being neat and atomic? It's not been of the slightest consequence to me. It's not like there's a realistic maximum number of revisions you can store in your repo.

But to the original point, clearly both of these features have a use-case, and people want them. Other source control systems in the past (which were much worse in many other ways) catered for this. But the current tension only exists because the dominant source control system doesn't really allow you to pick and choose how you see the data.

(Unless it does, see other thread)
I think that's right. I was thinking about that as I composed my own reply to this thread: it's got many of the hallmarks of J2EE.

That is to say, it's got features that a thoughtful CTO in a very large organisation somewhere, somehow has a well-articulated and nuanced use-case for, but it's not you and it's not anyone you know. And there are a lot of such features.
I really enjoyed using App.net for the brief time it flourished.
> late Stephenson

Which Stephenson are you referring to?
Not the first annoying networking bug introduced in 6.0.16 — if you have a CIFS mount, you get a kernel panic. There's a confirmed bug report about it on Red Hat's and the kernel's bugzilla. They don't seem to be related, so it's just coincidence.
I see these kinds of comments a lot, especially here. I've never understood them though, and always thought I was missing some insider knowledge.

Can you give some examples of bad things they've done to Firefox, to someone who thinks Firefox is pretty good?
This will worsen chrome, not all other chromium-browsers. Most non-google-vendors made it already clear they will not follow this specific change. Even Google moved back for the moment because of the reactions. We have to still see whether they really will go through with this.
Yes, I struggled to get a semblant of similar styles between the pictures, despite the same suffixes or playing with 'remixes'.

Sometimes, adding one extra word to the prompt (even though it doesn't describe the style) will change the whole visual style or change the thing you're trying to highlight.

It was my first time with Midjourney, I'm sure there are tricks to improve on that. Might revisit the images, I do agree that the styling inconsistencies don't look too good.
I have envy. I'm only one year into my second home with a gas range and I'm over it. It has excellent control (compared to traditional electric), however I find the rest of it frustrating. Any grease splatter and I'm removing and cleaning grates, surfaces, and caps. There are burners that are slower to light than others, so I'm regularly fiddling with cleaning out the orifices.

I'll consider moving to induction after I get my electrical panel upgraded.
I know. Buying a mansion is so nouveau riche.
Only because it's at the south pole. If we tilted the earth a bit, it would warm up and start raining. But if we tilted the earth a bit, Australia could probably also get wetter. As far as I understand it, the dryness of Australia, the Sahara etc are caused by the particular location from the equator, where moist air is lifted and brought to the equator and dumped there as rain. So if we pushed Australia further from the equator it would get a bit damper and maybe Indonesia would dry out.

I recommend we don't adopt this program of rotating the earth. It's almost certainly worse than just inventing fission power and pumping desalinated sea water to wherever we want to de-desertify. We'd probably also be better off if we wasted quintillions of dollaeuroyuans on a program to terraform Mars that ends in complete failure and the deaths of millions of workers over a century, but that's also an outcome I recommend we avoid.
Not yet, so far they have approached it the same at the rest of the Serenity project - compile it yourself. Which for the motivations of Serenity as a hobbyist OS make sense, but if Ladybird "graduates" from a hobby project I'm sure they will make builds available.
The 47% cut includes bonuses, equity, etc.

His salary is already a negligable portion of his compensation.
https://oem.bmj.com/content/60/10/759

There's an article from 2003 so this isn't exactly new.
“However, ever since the chatbot has come into action, it has been negatively impacting students' learning.”

This sentence is out of nowhere, did ChatGPT write this article? How could someone think something so new is suddenly negatively impacting students across the board.
It’s not demand but that media really wants to tell you what’s true.
I personally hate the exit-intent pop-ups, so I dislike that part, but maybe it's effective.

The website looks clean, maybe too stock-like at points (the review section especially looks fake).
I've not had one myself but all my friends are so hung up on some annoying details of most induction stoves that I am kinda ok with my old normal electric one (never had gas, it's not very common around here). Details include: The touch screen not reacting well, esp if you spilled something, a magnetic fob to enable it and no way to properly store it, insane cost should you drop something and damage it (ok, that one's far-fetched)...
I think the problem is basically the extremes, when they look at it, a lot of peoples social media use is pretty extreme if you consider how many hours they spend on it or how many times they check it a day, particularly with how much they check it during times they are having fun / with friends etc, i've been at many concerts and the usual complaint it that people are constantly taking photos and videos to post on social media, but lately i've seen it get even worse, where people are just doom scrolling during the show, during monologues of the artist, a song they are less interested etc.

So to me usage is already pretty 'extreme' by most people, the issue being that cutting it out completely is also 'extreme' considering how much of it is part of our world now. There are a lot of great things that i see, learn and get to experience through social media or at least the internet, things like hacker news, reddit etc are more valuable to me in this way, but it does enhance my actual life, because it's the core communication and marketing tool now, so to find out about new and interesting trends, it is needed in some way.

We need just to find a better relationship with it all, the problem is the tools are generally designed in such ways to avoid us from finding that better relationship, because that doesn't serve the service, they want the ad revenue and as much attention as possible.

For me that is reddit and Hacker news, I have instagram that i browse on occasion too, to keep up with a few peoples day/life, but then i avoid the rest like the plague, I still really need to cut down my usage of some of those though.
Good points.

It's just been a while since I was inspired by anyones research I guess.
Soon I'll be able to run my browser on Linux running inside a browser running on Linux running inside a browser running on...

More seriously, wow -- this implementation of the Blink x86_64 emulator in WASM really is tiny!
Let me guess, they sound exactly like the first page of google results on any term before ChatGPT. "Helpful" articles that all tell you the same generic useless stuff.

Except now they're not on 3000 sites, they're on 3000 sites plus CNET.
Gentleman scientist, inventor, explorer, and artist. Oh wait. That’s the list of I win a billion dollars.
I totally understand why you would "lol" at the idea of a tax credit lessening inflation. However, in this case it did actually cause a car company to reduce prices, so it's probably the biggest counterexample I've ever seen.
I actually was thinking about the individuals, but you’re right, he talks about how societies behave too (and that’s more important for the overall themes of the novel).

I wasn’t trying to be dismissive, although it’s not entirely my cup of tea; my comparison to Asimov is meant as a compliment.
Typically the claim comes up when discussing crime; one side usually advocates for harsher penalties for violent criminals and the other side argues that harsh penalties are ineffective and cruel—and usually some stuff about how the criminals can’t help it, they’re a product of their environment, etc. Typically, in my country at least, the side arguing for softer penalties tends to overlap a lot with the folks who are most likely to advocate for severe driving penalties. This seems like a contradiction to me, so I’m curious about how people reconcile this.
It doesn’t always work that way. We sometimes have friends we might not stay actively in touch with, but are able to pick up where we left off when we are back in contact. Friendships are complex.
Facebook was so great back before they monetized it. About 7 years back, I loaded up some mobile version of Facebook intended for feature phones in developing countries. I don't recall what the url was, but it was really basic, and it just had a simple chronological timeline you could piece through. I went back to my years in college, and it was just friends saying hi, asking to hang out, talking about mutual interests. There were no news articles or public posts, effectively no memes, and zero outrage. I know these sorts of observations are nothing new on HN, but it left such a stark impression on me that I still remember it all these years later.
Why should I believe that such statements don't represent his actual views? Why would I want to consume anything he writes then?

It's amazing the mental gymnastics people can go through to tolerate evil. Most people nowadays to think that if they were in a really fucked up situation like Nazi Germany or something they'd be one of the good guys, like they'd be helping Jews escape the country. But I don't think that's the case...
I was not including SDXC or even SHDC cards, only SD. I am trying to find a maximum capacity SD card to use in a Palm T|X, either 1 or 2 GB. Back when SDHC first came out, I often ran into issues with 2 GB SDHC cards not working on older devices. I think being difficult to find is another criteria to qualify as obsolete.

The odd thing about high capacity SD cards in general is that they are generally used as fixed storage. I have a 256 GB card that I put into a 11" laptop when I bought it and I haven't seen it since. I haven't used a CF or SD card like a floppy since storage hit 4 GB.

I agree that I spoke too hastily about optical media. Even modern gaming consoles have optical drives.
What difference does it make from a shareholder perspective if a business pays dividends or does share buybacks, other than the fact that share buybacks defer tax liability?
And Purdue Farma knew that Oxycontin was severely addicting.

And RJ Reynolds knew that cigarettes cause cancer.

And GM knew that tetraethyl lead was poisoning the planet.

And Meta/Facebook knows it is igniting racism, bigotry and even genocide all over the world.

And probably no one will be punished.
I prefer to think of it as the reciprocal of "residence time", that is how long the money spends at rest in a given account (on average).
and peak solar also typically lines up with peak air conditioning demand
Corporations don't get a magical exemption from being responsible for harm.

Smoking, asbestos, lead in petrol, and opiates have all been punished with huge payouts. [1]

Climate catastrophe is no different.

[1] The payouts could have been bigger - much bigger. But the principle stands.
For me, this is interesting because Exxon have subsequently funded think tanks and other methods of contesting climate science, resulting in people believing that "the science isn't settled" and mocking those who would work against AGW as "alarmists".

For example, the Heartland Institute.

Now it would seem that people who may have been trying to restrict action against AGW (in good faith), may have been fooled.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartland_Institute
I think the problem is that recently, the quality of pages linked from search results has increased. There seem to be a lot of people out there who are algorithmically generating product reviews and comparisons, especially.

In years past, I think it was much easier to discern such low-value content. But lately I find that it's not immediately obvious, and I waste time in drawing that conclusion and moving on.

So my search strategy, at least for the kinds of things most susceptible, is to shift from "open-ended with exceptions" to "only trust sites whose names I recognize".

Sad to see that I should consider moving CNet from the good column to the bad.
I just saw a new dark pattern. After viewing this 'Exxon' article on phys.org, I clicked to read another phys.org piece, which came up with a google ad blocking view of it, where the only 'close the ad' option was to "give feedback to Google" about it, so I punched "not interested" and it went away. The catch: it was an ad for something in a category that I am quite interested in.
This doesn't say anything about that company.

It says much, very much, about public institutions.
Except that's not true.

At the end of the day all stock market returns come from one's of 3 things:

Dividends

Earnings per Share growth

Multiple expansion

Over the long run the speculation that you so decry ( which amounts to Multiple expansion) has a negligible impact (less than 1%).

Sure you have plenty of short term booms and busts, but over the long term they are really irrelevant.
It doesn't add anything new to those who are already aware that Exxon conducted these studies, and have the expectation that this is normal behavior to work around when dealing with businesses, small or large.

Not everyone holds knowledge of this (say, people who may have recently started reading Hacker News), and not everyone would come to the conclusion that this is just something to accept and move on.

For instance, shareholders are suing Exxon for not being made aware of this.
Yeah, I'll admit my info/perception is out of date but I guess because after they split from Mozilla I mostly stopped following any updates. Maybe I'll play around with it this weekend just to see what it's like.
Silly question, but did you just use the same CSS as for the screen, or also make use of the various `@media print {...}` related CSS properties (for things like page breaks, switching to more traditional print units instead of px and rem etc)
> He does not mention Uighur genocide in his books.

So? lol

"It's ok if he believes putting certain people in concentration camps is good so long as he doesn't mention that in his books"
They require a license for read access? What are they? I don't think I've ever seen anything like that.
Do you use any blocking/restriction tools or really just programmed yourself to only check once and for five minutes a day? I'm really bad at that, it's so easy for me to just randomly check and then lose a bunch of time. To be honest that is exactly what I am doing now :(, over the years i've just never been able to break this habit.
Speaking of which, I wonder if the DMA would finally let us get decent RSS bridges for Instagram and Facebook. At least we already have that for Twitter.
Still got to pay that property tax
So says the climate change institute who funded the study.

The real reason seems to be elsewhere: people care about cooking with gas, but they use gas heaters if they have gas. If you can stop people from cooking with gas, you can switch entire houses to electric more quickly.
> So what is even the point of this? Do we want to say that it would have been the job of Exxon to minimize climate change?

Others have pointed out the obvious things, but I'll point out something maybe not so obvious. Corporations are legal fictions we created to benefit society. There is precedent establishing that they have a legal obligation to serve their shareholder' interests, but what if those interests conflict with national or society-wide interests? That legal fiction is no longer serving us but acting to our collective detriment.

I'm not aware of any precedent that balances these competing interests, but I hope someone can bring a suit with standing to create some precedent here, because these sorts of incentives are what drives a lot unethical, psychotic corporate behaviour.
are you the OP
But that's not true.
Sure but regulations are the to avoid them creating systemic risk by lending to dead beats.
> The capacity to qualify a predicative phrase by the interpolation of a subordinate clause (for example) is one of those precious attainments that distinguish us from baboons.

may well be pretentious*, but it is also true.

* if only due to the self reference; I doubt the embedding should give any serious reader pause?

[Edit: sic et non, for even baboons can follow this embedding pattern: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-64244-5 ]
I refuse to read shock media as a rule. Anyone qualified care to comment on the quality of the article?

Also worth mentioning this was lifted and edited off another blog that has since gone down.
I would say that std::optional's value_or() method at least is a foot gun here - as it creates a great opportunity for both an unnecessary temporary object and an unnecessary copy. That in itself merits a "use with care" flag.

Also, the fact that std::optional::value() apparently returns a reference, and thus `return opt.value()` is always forced to be a copy (I'm writing this based on another comment, I can't claim to fully understand C++'s extraordinarily complicated value types and their respective limitations) seems like another problem that's somewhat specific to std::optional itself.
Supposedely proposed changes would make it better and worth paying for.
Do you think the companies that produce the food you eat, the electronic devices you use, etc are all great? From slaves mining for making your phone to animal cruelty, to just being bad people, if you let your morals affect how you consume so much you'd go live in a cave.
You are thinking of scrum master, who can make up to 50% more than POs/BAs. Let me summarize:

1. "Hey, I am picking up my kid from preschool, so cover (my only 15 minute meeting of the day)". This is a mandatory future present in 80% of scrum masters.

2. Team, good job, I am so proud of what you have accomplished - I, for one, am always looking for the approval of a random person who has little to do with the team.

3. "Well, what do YOU think we should do"? "Thank you for your input! Let's remove those blockers. Go ahead and reach out to whoever the relevant person is!"

4. Key knowledge required: Daily standup, retro, planning meeting run by dev.

Did I miss anything?
Seems the popular way to burn through a lot of money right now is to start a vanity space program.
now its just youtube every day
I paid for Tweetbot on iOS for a few years. Canceled that sub when I closed my Twitter account a month or two ago. Sorry Tweetbot devs.
Not THE proof, A proof.
Best explanation I found is here:

https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CAFsF8vL4CGFzWMb38_XviiEgxoKX...

A patch was backported to the 6.0 branch from the main branch, but they forgot a line of code, leading to a buggy behavior.
I delete my reddit account every 5 years or so, mostly because if someone really wants to, they can probably know everything about me if they look back enough, there's also the folks that look at your entire history trying to disprove something you said, which is beyond creepy and discards the idea of people changing their minds about something. Truly disgusting behavior. So I wipe it all and start anew, the only problem with it is the bookmarks, the "save" functionality is a hindrance, its unportable and at the end of the day if the account or the website closes, there is no way to determine if the url is still alive. while you can programatically do that with your bookmarks file, you cannot do it if its in the website.
Keeping the money isn't necessary as unphilanthropic as you seem to imply.

Wealth doesn't typically sit under the mattress doing nothing. While the person is alive, they can control how that wealth is invested, and do good that way. Giving it away while still alive would take it out of their control, and perhaps they think that keeping control will do better from a philanthropic perspective.