skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What didn’t happen to you? Having to find new friends because most of your existing ones had kids 5-7 years later than you? Or do you not see how having to find a new friend group—versus entering a new life stage together with existing friends—can be quite a drag?
The Interview Brew
I think almost of these are on the list of past and present enemies. I haven't used Vite but I have better things to do than change the build tool in dozens of projects a year without any guarantees that it will not break like the rest of them.
I definitely cancelled mine. I decided to switch to using Garmin Connect fulltime instead of that and Strava.
Out of all the theoretical propulsion systems, THIS is pretty much the only one that we know would work without novel (made up) physics like negative energy, etc. In fact, I don't really think we'd need new/novel technology to test this. Biggest hurdle is getting into the right position with respect to a black hole to do this in the first place.
I'm guessing the people making the decisions are separated from the people who interact with customers by many layers of managers (and also the decision makers exist in a different socioeconomic bubble than the customers), and the only message able to penetrate all those layers with any speed or urgency is "we're losing money".
But you said "never"!

Too nuanced and pedantic, understood.
>It also will not include the license back provision that some people were afraid was a means for us to steal work. That thought never crossed our minds. Under any new OGL, you will own the content you create. We won’t. Any language we put down will be crystal clear and unequivocal on that point. The license back language was intended to protect us and our partners from creators who incorrectly allege that we steal their work simply because of coincidental similarities.

It seems like a lot of people were misunderstanding the terms of the license due to people not being familiar with them. It could have been better when asking for feedback if they had annotated it with more clear reasoning as the intended audience are not lawyers.
For your own content a more fool proof method would be to just use the files app.

It's ridiculous but at these other apps are all broken as you've now experienced.
I agree that htmx warrants an extra level of awareness as to the loss of that safety net. Especially if your encoding/escaping is done manually and is very localized (i.e. you explicitly call escaping functions from your templates or other output functions), In such cases, CSP is crucial.

That been said, that's not how XSS has typically been handled. Usually, those encoding/escaping steps are already made part of the tight Request/Response stack in the backend (e.g. as middlewares, as part of a data mapper library, or as a filter activated on the template engine or Response library). Also, this is usually a default behavior that often requires to be explicitly disabled. And as long as you don't have some "rogue" I/O processes completely outside of that pipeline, you're set.

Because of this typical setup, I tend to consider CSP a mere redundancy for XSS. If you lose that extra protection due to htmx, what you gain seems far more valuable to me.
Refactoring is so much fun, get outta here
Saw en passant so googled it...

holy hell.
You are going by your personal experience which is very dangerous. As far as I understand statistics (taken across the US), If I remember right, at least 97% of all meat comes from factory farms (depends on animal, this may not be aggregate across all animal types).

So, most people want to believe their meat comes from somewhere nice, but on average, basically all meat in the US comes from animals that are living in horrible conditions (I suspect living lives not worth living -- a life of suffering).
I think that you correctly identify this as a privilege.

This points to another deeper problem that drives this. Americans expect to be able to eat meat, even when eating cheap food.

Historically the food of poverty has either not included meat, or has used less desirable parts of the animal.

If meat production was all done humanely, then a large section of society wouldn't be able to afford to eat meat, or not often.

The subsidies, both explicit and implicit, in the meat industry in the US helps disguise income inequality
I wish I could go back in time in the 90s and re-live those early internet moments from childhood.
yeah noticed that and I will investigate why that's happening. For the context screenshot is taken by the chrome.
A tool like https://thin.dev/ might be good for you. You can port and serve functionality a little bit at a time into thin and use their managed postgres db and the schema editor to handle the new fields in the backend.
"i would pay for a service that reads in articles with low quality, clickbait headlines [...], and only recommend ones [...] to actually impact my life"

That would be... the NY Times? NEJM?
Strava’s increase also follows rises from other subscription services, such as Netflix and Amazon Prime.

And Adobe - I was just told my $14.99 plan was rising to $19.99.

Quickbooks online - a similar rise last November.
> As these were a significant contributor to my late wife's suicide.

I can't even imagine how hard it is for you. I am sorry for your loss.
Denuvo's purpose is to stop piracy for the first few weeks of release, since that is when the bulk of a game's sales happen. No one cares if it gets cracked after that. Many publishers themselves remove Denuvo protection from their games after a set period of time. By those measures it is an incredibly successful and effective piece of software.
> is painting a bit of a target on your back here, I think.

Only for anyone who has forgotten just how wretched and stagnant IE6 was, and how long the web ossified around it, and how much work it took to overcome the inertia of a crappy browser[1] shipped by a monopolist that did not want you to use the web.

There are many legitimate reasons to grouse about Chrome, Google, Google owning Chrome, etc, but the problems surrounding it are, I feel, an order of magnitude smaller than what we had in the 00s.

[1] The delta between IE6 and Firefox 1.0 was incredible, and everyone working on the web despised the work required to make websites work on the former.
Not to sound condescending, but this reads like someone who started reading the news last week. It has absolutely always been that way. We had segregationists in the Senate 20 years ago. Backbiting and media hijinks are the thing we do now instead of assassinations. When Al Smith was the first Catholic to be nominated by a major party for the presidency, he was greeted in the south by burning crosses. This was less than 100 years ago

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/nyregion/gop-path-recalls...
His last day in the senate was last week.
If you want to play in the browser instead of setting this up locally I made a replit: https://replit.com/@jamespsteinberg/AnalogChess-1
It would have been even better if they actually asked for feedback, instead of trying to get people to sign it in secret as a finished document
I didn't say it was recent. I said that UK has unfavourable wind patterns because there aren't enough trees.
Looking to learn and build a react app, should I start with this?

Did review some html css prior.
But if you are joining an Agile shop what do you get on average?
Ok, yeah. I had no clue that was a thing. That will be extremely useful. I'm often running python in a buffer and being able to run commands on output is a dream. Thanks dima55 and thank you emacs.
I guess the question I have is what features did Strava have for cycling which Garmin didn’t? My main sport is running so I’m coming at it from that angle.

I suspect the new training status stuff that’s been rolled out would likely be a good fit for cyclists, even those who haven’t purchased a power meter.
> and comes out behind in the end.

As someone in the tri community in vc funded silicon valley, I haven't heard of a better alternative to strava? would genuinely be interested in trying something better but all my running clubs still seem to be using strava
percent? or per cent? Perhaps a minor correction in title.
Take basic measures such as requesting removal of search results for the cracked versions, but don't put a lot of energy into anything else.

It is a waste of your time and you will be in a forever game of cat and mouse.
I think I'd pay $10/mo for it but then I'd probably cancel my Copilot subscription because its integration with Visual Studio is so poor.
I've found that as I get increasingly experienced/skilled, that ratio of the problem being in my code vs compiler, framework or OS issue decreases.

Not that most problems still aren't in my code, but I've increasingly run into framework/library level issues and very rarely compiler issues. Can't say I've triggered any kernel issues yet.
I mean, on balance, compared with the IE reigning years, Chromium is better than that, and its been mostly (again, from a developer perspective) a net positive in day to day developers lives that Chrome has not stagnated and new features ship.

That however, is not to say that its okay. There's other, broader issues than just developer experience to care about here, like what a Google dominated web means, because via Chrome, they can push a great deal around how the web actually works, which is a net loss to society. It can stifle other innovations. Things of that nature.

Good DX isn't the whole story
First graphical browser I used was Slipknot [0], which doesn’t appear to be listed.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SlipKnot_(web_browser)

(Edit: I see it now, must have skipped over it before.)
Most people will have moved on to other cars by the time the CCS1 network reaches parity with the supercharger network, though. Right now it's still a compelling reason to buy a Tesla. Maybe the best reason.
What is racist about inventing a fantasy race in a fantasy world? Please elaborate.
I'm sorry, it really isn't a big deal and I don't think anyone would be triggered or offended by the quote! And of course historical context matters. The poster was just proffering a friendly reminder that to push society forward it's helpful to consider these things.

It's just like changing our default branches from master to main, honestly probably not a huge deal to any rationale person, but the cost is negligible so why not?

It's possible to be empathetic and considerate, making minor adjustments (and also not judging those who innocently don't) without being the "woke" police!
My point was not at all to make you feel better. It was to explain a systematic reason why doctors underperform and empathize with their position instead of blaming them personally.
In previous years that recap was included in the free tier.
We definitely did that with the Commodore 64. Not sure if any 1541 or later disk drives did double-sided disks, but the "flippy" disk was a great trick.
If I had a nickel for every time WotC tried to change the OGL and the community got pissed, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice!

(The first time is what gave us Pathfinder 1e in the first place, for those who don't know - they took D&D 3.5e, under the OGL 1.0, and made modifications and continued its spirit)
> For this to be true, we'd had to assume sentience + malevolence.

No we don't. A "dumb," "parrot-like" AI is perfectly capable of large amounts of damage if it just happens to be really good at doing something that, in the limit, isn't very good for humans and is good at replication.

See for example Meta's Diplomacy-playing bots. They were perfectly capable of natural-language deception at the expense of other humans without any notion f sentience or malevolence.

In particular,

> It can only output text.

As we've seen with both private hobbyists and large companies, there is a race to hook up text to computers with real world access. Outputting text isn't much of a limit if that text ends up as instructions to command a real world system.
If you use Russ Cox's definition of software engineering, "Software engineering is what happens to programming when you add time, and other programmers.", software engineering is mostly soft skills, related to working with other people (including future you). Real skills, but not really technical skills, and things which almost no one will just have "out of the box", ie something to work at.

It sounds like these guys are really good technically, but they lack software engineering skills (using the above definition). Defining the problem in terms of brains or selfishness or empathy makes it sound like personal qualities when it's probably just the skills. If you frame the discussion around Russ Cox's definition of software engineering, you can a) get them to see the soft skills defined concretely, b) get them to see serious people (russ is a serious engineer) take it seriously and define it in a helpful way and c) talk about under the umbrella of "software engineering" and doing "good software engineering" (again, using Russ's definition of it) rather than personal qualities or technical skills.
Regardless of how much or how strongly Chrome may have been advertised, we can't forget that a lot of IE and Firefox users ultimately decided to try Chrome, then went ahead and actually installed Chrome, then actively used Chrome, and most importantly, decided to keep on using Chrome instead of the other browser(s).

All of that didn't just happen because of advertising. It happened become Chrome offered very compelling benefits over its competitors.

For many users, Chrome was faster, lighter, more secure, and offered a better all-around user experience than its competitors did. Even now, that's still largely the case.

Advertising alone can't make that happen.
That’s why I just cmd+(shift+)tab and cmd+(shift+)`. No need to use a mouse and it doesn’t bother me that the window stays in the background. Most apps run in full screen anyway. Same with windows: alt+tab (citrix…) is the way to go.

I haven’t minimised a window in months. For those special needs, there’s expose.
Using tools like syft and gryft, we can create detailed release SBOM for docker images, including a list of security vulnerabilities. As a software developer or release manager you want to keep track of these vulnerabilities and provide information downstream, but where?

Bogrod solves this problem by using a simple YAML file to keep track of all vulnerabilities, their effect downstream, and its status for the image in question, a.k.a. Vulnerability Exploit Exchange (VEX). The VEX data can be merged into the SBOM and delivered to users in the release notes.
Algorithms deploy capital all the time. Some massive chunk of the stock market is just algorithmic trading, as is pricing on plane tickets, and on marketplaces like ebay and amazon.
Quite the opposite. My happy place these days is working with higher level problems surrounding architecture, planning and the people behind the code.

That's why I switched to management.
Wizards of the Coast Breaks Silence on Dungeons and Dragons' Open Game License
born in halifax
Lina Khan’s Plan to Liberate US Workers
Oh ok, I was wrong. Working people should spend more of their paychecks on boots to prevent fires in Bangladeshi factories, and then it will be more comfortable walking to work because they can't afford a car. And no shopping in your utopia either.
https://www.facebook.com/dating
"I cannot emphasize this enough: ChatGPT is not generating meaning. It is arranging word patterns."

To reconcile this statement with his admission that ChatGPT reliably turns out passable results, we must assume the average student simply rearranges word patterns as well. So developmentally, this must be a mile marker on the road to competence.

"[Writing] is an embodied process that connects me to my own humanity, by putting me in touch with my mind"

ChatGPT's experiences with its own "mind" are fleeting and lost forever with each reset of prompt and zeroing of prompt history. Prompt compression and embedding architectures, combined with the steady growth of hardware memory capacity, should allow new models that continuously generate and process "thought" prompts. This should allow the primitive emergence of self-narratives and make a leap, I feel, towards the generation of true meaning.
Twitter is shutting down Revue

https://mayankvikash.in/posts/Twitter-is-shutting-down-revue...
Picking NFL playoff brackets with modeling
In my experience it just shows me all the tweets from people I follow in chronological order.
Interesting. Well, maybe as a consolation prize for slashing the price on the Performance model so much, they could give away the Performance Boost to anyone who bought a LR relatively recently. Please. :)
The guy who will clean up your code base isn't a viable role because then the team that works on the code day to day will have to re-learn where everything is. It can work when a company is acquiring new code to refactor during integration, since the refactor catches bugs and makes engineers become familiar with it, but that would be done by people staying with the code base as well.

Probably the closest things to that are test writer, technical documenter and build engineer.
Here's the full story of that: https://www.greenheartgames.com/2013/04/29/what-happens-when...

It's important to note that they didn't use DRM or anything like that to detect whether a given copy of it was pirated. They made two builds of the game: a normal one that they gave to paying customers, and the special one that they uploaded a torrent of themselves.
Your next job recruiter might be an AI bot
> That's been SOP for web development for aeons. I'd say the rewards vastly outweigh the costs. Not a deal breaker for me.

Very true, but it seems from my reading of the docs that standard escaping mechanisms are not enough. i.e. you also need htmx-specific ones.

> Attributes starting with hx- and data-hx ... should be filtered.
Maybe that is a reason for some people's negative reactions, but on the other hand there seems to be a lot of unwarranted enthusiasm from another crowd, who seem to think that Friend Computer will soon usher in an utopian age.

What currently exists is far from a human-level AGI, and it's not likely that just making a few tweaks would even get closer to that goal. The model doesn't in any sense understand what it is writing, it generates text that is optimized for appearing as if there is intelligence behind it, as long as you don't read too closely.

And while we don't have to fear a godlike superintelligence turning us into paperclips yet, there are a lot of potential negative consequences to this kind of limited AI, and very little of value to society. We don't need more efficient ways to generate bullshit or propaganda.
Yeah, it's such a weird thing to gate behind a paid subscription too. It’s not like I get anything useful beyond minor feel good fuzzies from yearly recaps of that nature.
I never cared for Grammerly and the like. I felt like they wanted to homogenize your voice and often dumb down your language. Google Docs' blue underlines, on the other hand, usually do point to an actual error of some sort.
This redundancy is quite irritating to me. For most people, their pronoun is simply "he" or "she". Showing other parts of speech is only necessary for nonstandard pronounds.
Classic corporate gaslighting. The notion that the changes were to prevent “hateful” content is ridiculous when it includes a massive royalty scheme. Besides, it violates the principles the original license was grounded in — WotC is not supposed to be an arbiter for what kind of products can be made with OGL-licensed material. That was the whole point of it! You didn’t have to ask them for permission!
In chess, you win when you are "about to" capture the opponent's king on your next move, which is called putting them in check, and there's no way for the other side to avoid it (block or move out of check).

So I've always found it very bizarre that if it's a player's move, but any possible move would put their own king in check, then it is a draw (rather than a loss).

This leads to a situation where one side can have almost no pieces left, perhaps only the king, but still somehow draw since the king can't move anywhere where it wouldn't be captured.

I imagine a king all by himself peeping his head out out for a place to move, but everywhere is covered by snipers, so, since he can't move anywhere without getting captured, despite being overwhelmed by enemy forces he yells out a la monte Python "So we'll call it a draw then!"
I think they'll do fine. It's just that their peak valuation was unreasonably high. Basically many expected it to become the Apple of the automotive world (i.e. both huge volumes and much higher margins than anyone else) and that's probably unfeasible longterm due to a variety of reasons if their competitors eventually catch up.

Obviously Tesla will still be valued at premium even compared to the legacy car makers who transitioned successfully to EV (and that makes sense from a financial perspective e.g. high debt levels and various other obligations). But it really made no sense for Tesla to have a higher market worth than all the other car manufacturers combined..
> These platforms are for casuals.

At least in road and trail running, this doesn't line up with my observation. There are plenty of elite athletes, at least in the US, who are posting their training on Strava (Jim Walmsley, CJ Albertson, Molly Seidel, etc.) At the fast amateur level (e.g. those chasing the Olympic Trials Qualifier time), Strava adoption is pretty ubiquitous.

Out of the the athletes who are active on social media in the first place, those who don't post on Strava are usually doing it either for privacy reasons, or because they do not want to share their training plans for their competitors to copy.
The "why" is easy to find out without tracking all your users.

> A license costs a few thousand dollars
I feel like execs are still not used to the idea that people with niche hobbies can form large groups over the internet, and, moreover, immediately take action in a way that hurts the company's bottom line. [0] Just think about how this would have gone down in the 80s or even the 90s. A few grumbles on a BBS or forums, but for the most part, no one is reading the fine text of the license in the book. There is no news about it, maybe a fanzine talks about it, but those only have so much distribution. People aren't informed enough to have an opinion, let alone do something about it.

[0] Subscription-based models are a double-edged sword like that. Anyone can say, "well I won't buy the next edition's books", and even if they mean it, Hasbro can ignore that threat until they're out. But if people can instantly end their subscriptions, well, that's different.
I agree. This is why I am surprised by the assertion and asking the person who made it.
They can up to a certain point. MSFT Defender logs has some info with regards what has been deleted, but some other information are missing (such as command line parameters associated with the lnk file)
So if doctors are intelligent, why do they put up with such a horrible system? Surely they have some sort of power in these scenarios?
Instead of working full-blown web app I finished MVP and telling it to the world so that I can move on to adding more feature while I validate the idea.
Yes, but it’s bi-lateral. Late boomers and Gen-X were the first cohorts in America fully socialized into the precept of individual sovereignty. Their kids are thus the first generation where the parents aren’t pushing for grandkids, and the kids are also comfortable disregarding whatever parental pressure exists.
YouTube Premium too... https://9to5google.com/2022/10/20/youtube-premium-price-hike...