skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've thought about doing this, but it's as you've pointed out cost prohibitive.

However, you can install the Wolfram engine for free on a Raspberry Pi and make calls to Wolfram through the command line interface. This could be a great solution, but the API calls to WolframAlpha are slow, which might affect the system's performance. It could still be used for out-of-band systems.
It's not "just propaganda": many Germans got rich at that period, there was an actual economic overturn of germany before the war, and Hitler played on the fact that many felt victims and humiliated by the versailles treaty after WWI. This was also consequences of some parts of the "nazi ideology".

Yelling "Nazi is bad", while absolutely true for the war, the racist ideology and the holocaust, is often used as nothing else than a tribal rally cry to make us feel better than what happen (often with good intention).

But it hides the whole complexity of the situation and individual experiences at that time, and the most important fact: same stuff like the holocaust and wars could re-happen in the same conditions. People can justify absolutely anything crazy against a perceived enemy as soon as they feel "victims" in a way and it happens every day.
I'm doing the same. It's also quite nice for de-duplication, a lot of operations on our data happen on a column basis, and we need to assemble tables that are basically the same, except for one or two computed columns. I usually store all columns in a separate file, and assemble tables on the fly, also memory-mapped. Quite happy with being able to do that. Not sure how easy that would be with parquet.
This is the gallop part. I called you out on your first set of links (one of which legitimately hoodwinked a commenter here!) and instead of defending those arguments you're pivoting to another. I won't engage here either, except to point out that this isn't "published research" (it literally tells you that on the first page).

The clear and inarguable truth is that the Tesla fleet is pushing three million cars now. They're safe. Are they safest? safer? less safe? There's space for argument. But the kind of absolutist story you're spinning just doesn't hold. If these cars were actually causing accidents at even a moderately higher rate, we'd quite clearly know about it. And they aren't.
Why would you be interested in an open source alternative?
If the reason for this is that it's hard to change names, then the solution is to make it easier to change names, not to use stupid names. A given service should run on hardware/VMs that are named related to that service, and if the service goes offline, so does that hardware or those VMs, to be repurposed (and renamed) into something else.

Anything else leads to madness, or starts from madness.
Ask HN: As an engineer, how to learn handling interpersonal conflicts?
What's the best way for engineers to know about generic workplace interpersonal conflicts and how to resolve them? Things like dealing with colleague who steals your work, micromanging boss, etc. A lot of people face same issues and feels like we should have a handbook of sorts.
Scrum Master is the one who handles removing blockers, "Management" doesn't need to be there for every standup. It's a waste of their time.

Scrum Masters should also be just a member of the team, not a "master" per se.
Ah sorry, should have copied that: https://youtu.be/_rBO8neWw04?t=1613
Wait is this an actual issue? Do you guys specify that it is strictly optional?
Most of the world doesn't need any sort of complicated automation, we have submarines with the express intent of making good on the mutual part of mutually assured destruction
That sounds more like technical debt without a payment plan.

Imagine that all of those physical machines stop working tomorrow -- let's call it the fictitious but notorious y2.023k bug. Imagine the software won't install or run on the a current day computer+operating system. Imagine you cannot install the old version of the operating system on new hardware (missing drivers / the operating system vendor pulls an Apple and explicitly prevents that / it's against the ToS and you'll get sued / your license has expired / etc).

Now what?
MuscleWiki: Find exercises that work specific muscles
In my experience people love douchebags, especially if they are attractive and talk with confidence about things they have no idea about.
Which people are hurt by rejecting 1, 2, 3, 12, 13 and 14 from this list?
> as much as possible, do not allow custom patterns/structures

This is key. Most engineers want to build frameworks instead of applications. But leave the frameworks to the framework builders unless you were hired to build a framework.

I can jump into a 10 year old rails code base and be productive right away if they stuck to the framework defaults. But invariably someone read some blog posts about how "rails doesn't scale" and built some rats nest of service objects/decorators/portsAndAdapters wtfs and it takes some serious code spelunking to figure out what's going on (hint - the end result is always creating or updating a database record, or making a single api call).

I would argue microservices also encourage bitrot. You can leave some service running on some ancient libraries for years it doesn't need changes. But if you have a monolith where you constantly keep the dependencies up to date - everything stays up to date.
I don’t own nvidia, but from what I read they finally managed to have proper DRM support in their drivers which was the only limiting factor for Wayland (as opposed to nvidia patching your X server binary to run the proprietary driver, Wayland in itself only depends on proper linux kernel APIs which weren’t supported by nvidia for a long time)
It doesn't matter what the peers think, if the BS-er is manipulating the manager well.
> I'm a PM now and I run my team's standups

You're management, you are not communicating laterally.
It might help if you give us some context as to what you already talk about in 1-1s.

With my direct reports (I am in data science, so the project timelines/structures may be a bit different), rather than ask for a status report, I will ask them if there is anything they're having trouble on/issues with. If there are issues, I help them solve and/or troubleshoot, and also demonstrate my approaches for dealing with that kind of thing. (Prefacing that this is not likely the only way, but it is a way that has worked for me.)

If there are no issues on their current project(s), then I ask for dataviz--what are they finding/working on finding/are models improving/etc.

Beyond that, it's discussions of project resourcing: are you hitting deadlines, when can we expect to wrap up this stage, etc.

Finally, if nothing else, I'll try to engage in some conversation--my style as a manager relies on ensuring the personal and work well-being of my direct reports.

OTOH, what do I talk about with my manager? Kind of the mirror image of what I expect from my direct reports:

1). Status updates on current projects

2). I'll ask for my manager's opinion on my approach to a solution. If they say it's fine, I'll note that (good for CYA); if it's not, I'll ask for their thoughts, or demonstrate having tried their way (if I have), or my estimation of the success of that approach. I try to do all of this in a way that lets me gauge how invested they are in said project. If their answer is all generalities, they're not likely super invested. If they can talk specifics, then I assume that I have support if I need it.

3). Ask if there's anything else we haven't discussed.

4). Get to know them; managers are people too, and you can help yourself by being in their good graces.
> but eventually they shit where they eat so much that end up creating an unmaintainable morass and choose to move on.

At a new company with a higher salary. My richest friends are all like this.
> How does this interact with individual or career growth? I don't want to work for the manager who insists I stay on the first few projects I worked on at the company forever...

The first project is maybe a bad example but if we say the "nth" project instead then:

- not always changing members doesn't mean never changing, companies should just not want you to jump between projects all the time (except maybe as junior programmer) and you shouldn't want this either as it's hard to build up proper deep expertise this way (instead of a lot of shallow expertise)

- if you are still in the same company and the company is healthy then it should be fine if you get asked questions about your previous project for some time after you switched (through not arbitrary, just as an "emergency" thing)

The problem is that the concept of carrier and seniority is seriously messed up in the software industry. Often shallow knowledge about a lot of things is more valued then actual expertise in the things needed. Similar you will find a surprisingly lot of people believing that a senior engineer which doesn't try to get into team lead/people managing positions is doing so because they "surly are incompetent and shouldn't be hired" (IMHO completely rediculus but I have still seen it often enough, just most times in a less directly phrased way). But in the end senior software development skills and team lead skills are distinct skill sets. Implicitly pressuring someone who is good at solving technical problems into a team lead position (or the other way around) is just a pretty stupid decision from a human resource utilization POV. (This depends a bit on the definition of team lead and yes team leads also need to have technical skills but most important they need to have the skill to listen to their team and not get stuck on their opinions, etc.).
> and the for-profit arm has some vague and laughably high "profit cap" to meet.

What's a profit cap? I've never even heard of that.
Ask HN: As a security analyst (SOC, etc.) what would you hope ChatGPT could do?
By that logic every homeless person is earning a living wage.

Living wage doesn't mean you'll die if you don't make that, it means you can't afford to support yourself and will require additional resources--often from government assistance.
I don't know of people who do PCB design, but I'm sure the usual suspects (Fiverr, Upwork, etc.,) will have them. I can do it, but I avoid that kind of work unless absolutely necessary.

However, for small-quantity, high-quality PCBs at a great price, once you have the design done, it's hard to beat OSHPark and OSHStencils for solder stencils. I highly recommend both.
So many people miss the point: We can do very little about AI tools including your content in their training set where, much transformed, it might influence created output. What creators should have control over is attribution & being used as a prompt.

Levels of control:

# Include my content and tag it with my name for prompts (don't care)

# Include my content but don't tag it with my name for prompts (anonymous)

# Include my content but require attribution if it contributes more than 30% to a piece of output (attribution)

# Exclude my content from your dataset and don't allow my name to be used for prompts (i.e. warn users if they use my name as a prompt)

These "license" levels would allow artists to have some control and could be enforced by bots that send prompts to AI generators & check for attributed or unattributed use that violates the license.
Everyone Deserves a Pinecil
Would you feel the same way if you were a petite 20-year-old woman who was just threatened by your husband after filing for divorce and being granted a temporary restraining order against him?
https://firefly.fandom.com/wiki/Griswald_grenade

TIL, thanks.
> In June 2020, Gordon Klein, a longtime accounting lecturer at UCLA, made the news after a student emailed him asking him to grade black students more leniently

It’s incredible to me that anyone would even think to ask this. I don’t think kids just come up with this stuff on their own. It’s the product of adults socializing kids into this sort of thinking. And I am deeply skeptical of the motivations of those adults. I don’t think they’re trying to cultivate mental models that maximize the potential and success of these kids.
>If it's 5x harder to audit someone who made a million dollars than someone who made 100,000, it's still worth auditing two of the million-dollar returns for every 100K return.

Why is it equivalent worth? Shouldn't that have to do with the level of fraud discovered and taxes recovered?

Many of the errors in low income filings are incredibly easy to detect. Think 1000x easier, and automated. These are things like two parents claiming the same dependent with the same SSN.
I have written a desktop data wrangling/ETL tool for Windows/Mac (Easy Data Transform). It is designed to handle millions of rows (but not billions). Currently it mostly inputs and outputs CSV, Excel, XML and JSON. I am looking to add some additional formats in future, such as SQLite, Parquet or DuckBD. Maybe I need to look at Feather as well? I could also use one of these formats to store intermediate datasets to disk, rather than holding everything in memory. If anyone has any experience in integrating any of these formats into a C++ application on Windows and/or Mac, I would be interested to hear how you got on and what libraries you used.
How much of that was just competently running companies that already had massive growth momentum behind them?
That was also my experience. When I would point out its algebra mistakes by showing a counter example, it would say “you’re right, that is a mistake, here’s an updated proof”, making a nearly-identical (or sometimes exactly identical) mistake.
This is a great idea, so long as the same body has the power to decide how the NHS is structured and managed too, free from central government interference. Accountability seems totally absent anyway, so let them just get on with it.

The Conservative government are deliberately running it into the ground and only true independence in terms of funding and management would be enough to isolate it from further sabotage.
ULID Identifiers and ULID Tools Website
Good story.

I’m not surprised that the sap might have cured your wart. The sap contains latex and other irritating components. Several cures for warps involve covering them with an irritant and triggering the body to slough off a layer of skin containing the wart. Compound-W is salicylic acid in a waterproof carrier that irritates the skin into peeling off. Some people have used duct tape placed over the wart for that.
I don't put your desire for money ahead of everyone else's right to privacy.

Not to mention the part where optimizing content for maximum ad impressions has led to the rise of extremist content and political infighting.
I think the opening paragraphs highlight what is wrong with the hysteria over DEI. A professor (someone we would expect to be a leader, trying to teach young people) receives an email from a student. We don't get to see the email, just the professor's rather snarky response. Whether you agree with the points the professor makes, you should be disappointed in the insensitivity he shows. He could have made all the same points while at the same time acknowledging that those deaths may have felt traumatic to some of his students, that their emotions were a legitimate concern of his as their teacher. My guess is that the student's original email was a lot more mature than his professor's response.
I remember using XFree86 in the late 90s and first ~3 years of the 2000s. When the X server started changing a lot circa 2003 it was really exciting, and I very eagerly anticipated those releases. I think Xorg is better than XFree86.

Some of the things they did off the top of my head:

* Render extension. This enabled all sorts of things, like easier drawing and scaling of pixmaps, or better font handling.

* Less monolithic build, phase out imake. This allowed iterating various components at different rates.

* Better auto configuration - less need to write a config file for the most common configurations.

XCB was also a good idea. I don't think it lived up to full potential because interest in writing code for X waned.

I think one thing that was lost to history are some of the proprietary X servers, such as those by Sun and SGI. The XFree86/Xorg lineage is missing their input.
That is cool the web front end exposes itself as JSON as well, good tip.

FWIW, they also have a pretty decent API. Its based around zones though, which you'd need to look up. So from that lat and lon, you'd get the zone from:

https://api.weather.gov/points/37.7827,-120.38

Using the zone information, you can get to a forecast:

https://api.weather.gov/gridpoints/STO/72,24/forecast

If you're wanting the current observations, you'd pick a station for that grid such as MOUC1 and go to its observations/latest endpoint:

https://api.weather.gov/stations/MOUC1/observations/latest

The API is in a JSON-LD format so its got a lot of links to related topics in the actual JSON payload. Looking at the JSON can make it somewhat easy to feel out what you need. The documentation is here:

https://www.weather.gov/documentation/services-web-api
Title is peak workism
Deployment is the significant barrier with these models. They have far more parameters than stable diffusion/DALLE2.
> I've been gainfully employed in industry for ~2 decades

Seems like you have the social network you need and the others would simply be a waste of time.

When I have a meeting with someone I don't already know I like to look them up on linkedin beforehand. But occasionally someone doesn't have a profile (or a useful one) there and that's OK by me. It's just a convenience feature ("Oh look, they worked at XXX too!").

If your company wants all that fluff, and you don't work in the company's marketing department, there's something wrong with the company.
He oversimplifies it, I think. Amtrak does get track priority over freight during scheduling, but if a train is late then it won’t be in position to take advantage of it. Freight trains don’t cause Amtrak trains to be late to begin with.
Are there any more informed folks in here that would like to discuss how "having an ISO standard" would improve Julia?
That depends on what you want to extend. You can expand the capabilities of the LSP, linter, and formatter by adding new configurations. You can also create new color themes for the editor and the terminal. You can also customize the UI (it won't be that easy, but you can). But, if you want to create a new plugin... since it's native code you'll need to at least fork the repository and create the plugin on your own repository. I don't plan to be a dictator, just a supervisor. And of course, I'm more than open to getting new collaborators (this is the main reason I'm publishing it), that would be great. I just want to ensure that my application branch is "safe" (no malicious code, no horrendous implementations, etc).
You're right. How could I know this? I have formed an opinion about a person I have never personally met. Mea culpa. My impression then is that Stephan Wolfram, in spite of his considerable and quite & justifiably impressive brain, refuses to apply the necessary corrective measures to adjust for the fact of the existence of external agencies in the world when formulating his personal theory of the world.

> a bot that is almost always wrong

"It’s always amazing when things suddenly “just work”. It happened to us with Wolfram|Alpha back in 2009. It happened with our Physics Project in 2020. And it’s happening now with OpenAI’s ChatGPT. "

It is possible I missed the widespread excitement about Wolfram|Alpha and Project Physics. The former did make waves in geek circles, I remember that. The latter did not make it to the New York Times, did it?

https://www.google.com/search?q=Wolfram%7Calpha+stephan+wolf...

https://www.google.com/search?q=Project%20Physics%20stephan%...

https://www.google.com/search?q=ChatGPT

Coping with that, in his specific case.
"living wage" is a legal term used in policy deliberation
So that the correctness can be audited by the community, so that I can self-host
Kind of an exploitative piece. Disparity in coaching aside, Hamlin's injury has happened in all sorts of other sports and isn't particularly related to football itself or... uhhhh... racism in general.
RabbitMQ Topology Simulator
There are already open source LLMs with comparable parameter counts (Facebook's OPT-175B, BLOOM), but you'll need ~10x A100 GPUs to run them (which would cost ~$100K+).

I suspect a big part of why stable diffusion managed to consume so much mindshare is that it can run on ordinary consumer hardware. On that point, I would be excited about an open-source RETRO (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.04426.pdf) model with comparable performance to GPT-3 that could run on consumer hardware with an NVMe SSD.
CDC or EEP is to be the replacement, so i dont think it would be a hobbling.

it looks like RNDIS skulks about.

the rndis use case for "reverse keep alives" are something to examine for sure.
Weekly sounds exhausting! Who thought that up? Every two weeks feels like too often sometimes. Any way you could change the schedule?
People have been calling for a recession since June and you can see the signs everywhere except where it really matters to people: the labor market

Slow down? Sure. Recession? Eh.
Funny that you never complained about farm subsidies.
Reposting my comment from when info about the MOU came out [2]

-----------

Here's my analysis of what's going to happen if this goes through.

First, quote from the MOU [1]:

> AFBF agrees to encourage state Farm Bureau organizations to recognize the commitments made in this MOU and refrain from introducing, promoting, or supporting federal or state "Right to Repair" legislation that imposes obligations beyond the commitments in this MOU. In the event any state or federal legislation or regulation relating to issues covered by this MOU and/or "Right to Repair" is enacted, each of AFBF and Manufacturer reserve the right, upon fifteen (15) days written notice, to withdraw from this MOU.

It might play out like this:

1. Deere starts a half hearted parts process. They will provide some parts, there will be year long delays in roll out, it will be annoying to use, documentation will be made incomplete on purpose by leaving out random pages or drawings and there will be no way to get them to fix it.

2. Farmers are now locked into using this service for their existing deere equipment because anything else will bankrupt them. Those machines will remain in service for a good 10-20 years which is an important time frame, because

3. Deere will spin off a subsidiary or buy a competitor which will sell what used to be Deere branded technology, "under license". This "new company" will keep all the anti-repair technology in place. New products will primarily come from this company going forward, and the products will be priced so that actual Deere-branded products are not competitive any more, especially second-hand ones.

4. It is now 2028. The MOU cannot be broken because farmers still need parts for their "old" Deere products. Deere anti right to repair lives on in the artificial competitor, which now retains 90% market ownership. Farmers cannot argue for right to repair any more. They've been sold out. Everything has gone back to normal for at least the next 25 years, as far as Deere is concerned.

[1] https://www.fb.org/files/AFBF_John_Deere_MOU.pdf
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34308334

-----

(end repost)

Looks like so far the JD user in the video agrees with what's happening, to the letter, even including parts lock-in. I didn't immediately conceive that JD's repair shops would threaten farmers who are politically active with withholding repairs, but I probably should have.
While the term "fair wage" is obviously something that's more "arguable" (e.g. what's fair?) it seems to me a less loaded phrase than "living wage," the alternative to which, on its face, seems to imply death.