skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And some countries already are. For example, in Lithuania there are subsidies (~40% of installation price) for replacing gas, wood or coal furnaces with heat pumps. (Also subsidies for installing solar panels and batteries too.)

It's just that... Theres so many households and only so few manufacturing/importing/installing capabilities. And the subsidies aren't limitless too :-)
I’d love to see which reviewer rates Ray’s pizza that high in recent years. I thought it was just famous for being on Saint Marks and appealing to drunks
I don't know how it will work in Australia. Here leave accrues by law. Min leave here is 20 days but some companies gives more like 20-30 days. When you leave the job all accrued leave has to paid based on the last salary.
The only train I could find that goes anywhere near my mother's house would take approximately 12 hours, with a 5 hour layover in a small town with ~nothing to do. I can drive it in maybe 1.5 hours. That's why.
Ahh okay, thanks. So how big is the model? Seems like it should be available to download so people don't have to train it. I understand you can train it on custom data but for a "default" model are there any available to download?
Right, if someone is incapacitated, putting the life of that person and others on the road in danger is still not the right move. It doesn't matter what the driver is doing, any driving system that puts other people on the road in danger does not belong on the road.
New: https://rvspace.org/en/project/JH7110_Upstream_Plan
Attack Techniques: Phishing via Local Files
I don’t know the pizza in the area that well, but I remember Luigi’s in Clinton Hill being pretty good. Have you tried it?
It depends on what the priorities are. If self-driving is allowed now, it may lead to a few accidents, but the tech will progress faster and we will have very safe FSD cars sooner.

On the other hand the sooner we get FSD cars, the sooner we will also get ASI and with it potentially the end of human kind.
500 syscalls/sec is a huge amount of useless overhead for a high performance system.
It would be merely descriptive if you only came across it when e.g. discussing people who can get away with skipping the sun screen. When it’s the category that gets brought up in the newspaper when someone becomes CEO then it’s prescriptive. The word is shaping how people are perceived and defining them by their skin color, instead of other characteristics that are much more relevant.

It’s also just racist insofar as it makes skin color the dominant grouping to the exclusion of others. The fact that you might think you have good intentions doesn’t make it less racist. For example, the closest analogue to the Latino experience in America is the Italian American experience. From socioeconomics to food to patriotism to language to religion there are myriad parallels. Likewise the closest parallel to Indians is Jewish people—both of whom are successful in America but often the target of resentment, especially due to religious differences. But white people can’t look past skin color and insist on categorizing Latinos and Indians as “colored people” in the process erasing much more salient aspects of their experiences in America.

Your point about “racism” illustrates the problem. There is no single coherent thing called “racism” that applies to all “people of color.” Indian Americans face the ordinary prejudices people of different ethnic groups have towards each other. It’s the same prejudices Indians have towards Chinese or vice versa. Jewish people almost certainly face more prejudice in America than Indian Americans. We acknowledge that prejudice, but don’t go so far as to categorize and define them based on it.

Meanwhile, the “racism” faced by ADOS and indigenous people is different in kind. The prejudice is just the tip of an iceberg, and beneath that are the realities of being a minority population that was enslaved and brought to this country by the majority population or one that was nearly wiped out by the majority population in settling the country. The point is not that “racism” knows how rich you are. The point is that “racism” that isn’t accompanied by structural socioeconomic disparities isn’t meaningfully the same thing as “racism” that is.

And it’s not useful to any minorities to conflate these categories. Thinking in terms of “people of color” is bad for black and indigenous people. Because fixing prejudice based on skin color won’t meaningfully fix structural problems. At the same time, it’s not good for Indian Americans to falsely believe they face structural disparities when they do not.
Extending Kubernetes Networking with Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)
A liquid natural gas port was fast-tracked. It worked.
Props for letting visitors see how it works without needing a login. Well done.
It's difficult to gauge from the photos but I was thinking that the phone is seated too far from the mouth for reliable audio input (it certainly feels like I have to raise my voice, if not shout, whenever I'm talking to someone with the phone that far away from me).
I bet you would. What color are your programming socks?
They are so much brighter.

Fucks with my astigmatisms.
No one solution needed to be be total. It’s been 11 months and the concern has already shifted to next winter that’s a long time for wind/solar to be reducing demand for natural gas turbines. Burning less gas in July let’s you have that gas to burn in January assuming you have storage capacity.

My point is the plan seems to be “let’s just import it whatever the cost” rather than saying what can we do to minimize the need while also increasing imports.
Shameless plug, while this does not have full articles explaining decision process, I started tracking design decision with a short summary and the date those choices were introduced: https://github.com/wiringbits/scala-webapp-template/blob/mas...

This has been helpful to my team because there are times where something does not seem right, or, it just seems a weird choice, documenting the reasoning can help new team members to understand this.

In retrospective, I should have started doing this many years ago.
Extreme Acceleration Is the New Traffic Safety Frontier
Does it mean Objective C is going to be second-class language? It would be a pity, I prefer Objective C to Swift.
A person that spends considerable portion of their time really learning new things will initially be slower at their work than people who only do work.

But over time this person will be getting better and better and better and at some point they will be able to do their job on the fraction of their time while still keeping momentum and learning more.

This has been my experience.

I have been spending 3/4 of my working hours learning new things for the past about 17 years after I realised this. The actual work takes a very tiny part of my day.

Software development really is a knowledge sport. Writing code is actually pretty small part of the task -- knowing what to write is the important part. If you are able to "write down the answer" so to speak, without spending much time getting there, you can be 10 or more times productive than everybody else, easily.
Invading a neighboring nation and bombing their cities in order to capture more territory for yourself is pretty darn bad.
I'm not getting why you think you need to override the cruise control. I had that concern when starting out with ACC, but I set its follow distance to something generous enough that it would trigger a speed change before I got anxious about it failing to trigger the change. That let me learn to trust it.

Although now that I think about it, I was using the Subaru ACC, so the dash has a visible indicator if it's tracking a car and maintaining speed relative to that. Perhaps yours doesn't have that?
Still under $5 if you’re getting them on a Kaiser roll (as opposed to a sub)
People who take offense at what I have written are wrong to do so — and I’m not going to engage with you any further. Have a good day.
Traditional offices are as outdated as typewriters. Employers need to adapt
100% agree. VR immersion is fundamentally broken anyway due to the locomotion problem. You can walk freely in your play area but it's always too small compared to typical game world size. So you end up being able to look around, duck, and dodge, but if you want to take a step forward, you need to remember to twiddle a joystick instead. It's a lot of cognitive load and discomfort for very little benefit.

Flat games feel quite immersive already. And others can easily be nearby and watch.
I'm interested in understanding why you would want every subdivision of "type of crash" to strictly improve, rather than being content that the combined crash rate goes down?

i.e. if Tesla causes 100 new crashes of type A but saves 200 of type B, isn't that a gain? Even if type A crashes are one which humans don't normally make.

A way in which I agree with you is if type B crashes are more avoidable by conscientious drivers, and you feel that your personal base rate of B is therefore already low, and that introducing new type A risk is actually NOT an all-in improvement for you.
Wouldn't it be easier to stay quiet since you don't have a meaningful rebuttal?
To compound this. Its not unreasonable to think that malfunctioning probes could consume entire solar systems to create more probes before eventually engulfing the galaxy.

aka the VN Berserker hypothesis
FSD vs navigate on autopilot is a pretty small technical detail on the highway. Once you turn on FSD beta, from the driver's perspective FSD and autopilot are the same thing - turned on with the same input (double tap on the right stalk), with the same stuff shown on the display.

Navigate on autopilot can change lanes on the highway and follow highway exits without user intervention.

IMO when someone says they're using "FSD" they mean they're subscribed/paid for FSD, have the FSD beta turned on, and are letting the car drive itself (whether that's FSD on city streets, or navigate on autopilot on the highway.)
Seems like we need to lift the residency limits and allow for more doctors to be added to the work force.
> FWIW, the default concurrency has been changed to "unlimited" since the 0.1.0 release.

Nice! Will that end up on Github?

> Out of curiousity, what do you want

Most often I want to return just the first error. Some reasons: (1) smaller error messages passed across RPC boundaries (2) original errors can be inspected as intended (e.g. error codes) (3) when the semantics are to cancel after the first error, the errors that come after that are just noise.

A couple other thoughts

- I think the non-conc comparison code is especially hairy since it's using goroutine pools. There's nothing wrong with that and it's fast, just not the easiest to work with. Often goroutine overhead is negligible and I would bound concurrency in dumber ways e.g. by shoving a sync.Semaphore into whatever code I otherwise have
- I like that errgroup has .Go() block when concurrency limit is reached. Based on a quick skim of the code I think(?) conc does that too, but it could use documentation
As everyone is pointing out to you, ABS solves the problem of your car's wheels skidding, leading to loss of control.

It doesn't help with the trailer that you're towing failing to stop as fast as you do, trying to run into you, and trying to turn to the side when it can't.

The solution to the latter problem is to be aware that you have the trailer, and to not brake faster than it can handle. The fact that the trailer makes it harder for you to avoid an accident is exactly why many jurisdictions put extra restrictions on cars towing trailers (for example in CA they aren't supposed to go over 55 mph - even on the freeway).
For someone who acknowledges how little he knows of the matter, you've said a lot. You did not promote critical thinking by raising those questions--you only expressed your malicious doubt. Anyone who truly has the humility to recognize the limits of their knowledge would have said nothing at all.
Pickup trucks and large SUVs have their headlights mounted higher up and dazzle drivers in normally sized cars.

It's another example of regulatory capture where owners of pickups and large SUVs have free rein to dazzle lower folk.

Interestingly lights on heavy trucks are regulated in height and aim so that they don't dazzle other drivers.
Yeah, it looks like one of those cases where Elon is being stupid - self-driving cars with LiDAR are a lot safer.

Anyone know how much a LiDAR system cost nowadays?
I started to write Go recently and I very much prefer panics to errors. For example in web apps. Panic produces nice stack trace. Panic bubbles automatically, I can reduce amount of code significantly. Errors are awful and panics allow to write code without losing sanity. It's like good old exceptions. And if I really need it, I can catch panic and act as needed, e.g. return HTTP code or whatever.
I just did a 1500+ mile road trip over the holidays. During the drive, I was trying to figure out why old-tech (2005) cruise control worked so well.

Even a 1 mph differential in speed is a car length change in following distance every 10 seconds. A 1/2 mph difference is 3 car lengths of change every minute. That seems like enough that would be annoying, but it obviously wasn’t when two cars are following each other both on cruise control.

I still don’t have a fully satisfactory explanation for something that I can easily observe (that it’s usually not annoying).
> IMO the car signaled, changed lane and stopped without slamming the brakes

Which is erratic and reckless.

If it was an emergency situation it should have put on hazard lights, waited until all surrounding cars passed, then changed lanes and very slowly decelerated until it stopped.

All while aggressively alerting the driver what is happening.
Not sure what you mean. If autopilot has a bug then there is a good chance a lot of other cars do too, since (afaik) autopilot is not at its core Tesla proprietary tech like FSD.
The issue in these cases is typically not the actual information but the methods of collection. When astronomical or other information is collected by an intelligence system, it can be time-consuming or even theoretically difficult to "sanitize" the data so that it does not reveal information about the design, capabilities, and specifications of that system. For example, imagery collected by intelligence satellites for purposes like wilderness firefighting is usually kept classified and distilled into summary maps instead, because the images themselves could be analyzed to reveal the resolution, sensitivity, and wavelength filtering of the sensor used... Valuable information to an adversary designing countermeasures.
That would not have helped for this winter.
This is an honest question here but why is the pile up so bad if driving conditions were ideal? The next 6 drivers were not keeping a safe distance or paying attention?
> To immerse yourself, you need to block out your peripheral vision and everything else.

But what if that's what I want? I want VR so I can experience totally different worlds fully as if I was there. I can do that safely from my living room.

I want AR so I can live the cyberpunk dream of seeing data and other extra info overlaid on top of my normal vision while out in public.

I don't think either concept is flawed, they just have different purposes for different times and places.
This is a neat trick.

Worth noting that "Row values were added to SQLite version 3.15.0 (2016-10-14)" - my experience is that older versions of SQLite are a lot more common than I would hope they would be. https://www.sqlite.org/rowvalue.html
Japan has an extensive network of tunnels for trains, not cars. It's a totally different problem, and doesn't require remotely as much space because trains can carry so many more people and are pretty narrow and don't need lots of lanes for passing. Asking for all the major roads in a city to be moved underground is lunacy; you can do a few tunnels here and there (like big cities such as DC and NYC already do), but that's about it. The answer isn't more car-based infrastructure, the answer is to make cars inconvenient and move people into trains, and make ground-level streets better for pedestrians and cyclists.

>i wouldn't advocate taking away cars, but rather providing a more human-centered environment that de-emphasizes cars in our lives so that we can better build relationships and communities with each other.

You can't have it both ways. If you make it possible for everyone to have a car, then it becomes impossible for people to not have a car. You can do what we have here in Tokyo: make car ownership extremely inconvenient and impractical, by making the streets narrow and basically eliminating parking, or having a small amount of very expensive parking. Then, the only vehicles using the streets are mostly taxis (they don't need parking) and trucks, not personal cars. Narrow streets + no parking lots means buildings are much closer together and the city is dense enough for walking and cycling (with the help of subways of course).
Maybe in some companies developers work very hard and are short on time. Maybe you are in one of these companies yourself.

In my own experience, devs aren't often overworked and do have the time to do stuff like this. They just rather not spend the time on it for various reasons.

What incentives would get you to work on an old legacy project?
> Can we fix the U.S. Healthcare system? My opinion is no.

I am going to say that every large 'super' institution will end up in this problem ... Unfixable.

Whether it is military, judiciary or educational system -- they have the same issues as the healthcare system -- when they grow 'super-large' and become managed centrally (either directly or via near-centralized money flows).

It is the nature of end-days of human-driven society super-structures (gradual corruption, then selective-outrage decision making, then more corruption, then a form of centralized control that removes innovation/investment incentives, then the down-fall in quality of function/service, then the destruction).

So the only solution to that, and I am 'stealing' this idea from the US founding fathers -- is to avoid having these near-centralized super structures.

Many think that we need this superstructures (including near-monopolies in business) to build complex things: planes, vaccines, CPU chips.

But we do not, and we should find a political and economical systems that are effectively based on many localized 'guilds' and decision centers linked into ad-hoc-chains to create increasingly better outcomes (with the cost of some repetition, some anarchy, and some missteps).

Military and supreme court are the only institutions that I think should be centralized, but they have to be ran with checks and balances that are distributed across the many 'local' decision and power centers.

So that's the only way I can think of to avoid this constant periodic death of the human-led super-structures.
I think augmented reality is hard. Practically speaking VR only needs to create an image, while AR needs to create and register an image in space and time.
Static and concise NPE protection via optional syntax, and the guard construct, both make defensive programming much easier in Swift. Tons of other little things.

Memory management is easier than it is in Rust. It has generics which makes it more flexible than Go [was until its generics were recently introduced]. Kotlin native wasn’t announced until three years after Swift.

I don’t think it’s as simple or one-sided as you’re making it out to be.
Related reading:
- https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/drug-users-use-a-lot-o...
Ask HN: Why are there so few old ICs?
I work at a huge tech company.

In my org of 100, the rough breakdown is like this:

70: IC under age of 40
25: Managers, mostly over 40
5: IC over 40 (all are principal)

I know people say that as you age, you move to management or principal. But the math doesn't check out.

In my scenario, if we broke it down like this
- 30 openings for traditionally "over 40" roles
- 70 people that will eventually be "over 40"

70 people - 30 openings = 40 people without jobs

Where do they go?
This seriously impacted performance of Zoom on my linux laptop. It's still pretty bad, but significantly better with TZ set.
Some combination of Tampermonkey, MutationObserver and IntersectionObserver almost always gets there in the end, but despite having a default user script template with this exact skeleton it's a lot more of a pain in the arse to achieve what a simple CSS selector and some properties does in a few lines...
I like Valentine's as well.
i don't think any of the things I've liked that found a sustainable business model remained the way I liked them either
Weird that (actually enormous) semi-trucks / lorries seem to have managed not to do this, either now or for the past 20 years. It's only the (fake-enormous) light pickup trucks following this trend.
Do you know if there's any work on peer-to-peer clustering of GPU resources over the internet? Imagine a few hundred people with 1-4 3080Tis each, running software that lets them form a cluster large enough to train and/or run a number of LLMs. Obviously the latency between shards would be orders of magnitude higher than a colocated cluster, but I wonder if that could be designed around?
Meta definitely has open and active job openings.

It seems like a lot of companies are perpetually hiring. However the unspoken part is that they're only hiring people who they can underpay and only if they're a perfect match for a hard to hire position.
I’ve had two cars with the feature.

Both have a very simple there/not their car silhouette to let you know if it detects the car in front of you. Just below that they also have some sort of colored to tell you how close the car is (good, clothes, to close). Last is a silhouette of your car. All three in a simple stack.

It’s an excellent design, perfectly glanceable. I did rent a car once that showed you how many feet away the car in front of you was. It was kind of interesting but I found it completely useless.

Realistically when the car in front of you starts getting close enough that the indicator changes, the car is already slowly slowing down. If it turns red, your car is slowing down faster.

You really don’t need any of the numbers, and they would likely take longer for a person to process than the simple visual imagery does.

I haven’t had an issue of not understanding what the car is/is going to do. The only real prop I’ve experienced is some cars are willing to accelerate/decelerate much faster than I want them to, largely for comfort reasons.
fits with cosmological natural selection

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_natural_selecti...
I’ve spent time in New Haven and NYC and… not even close. Sure there’s good slices in New Haven, but there are also pizza deserts, and a lot of them. New Haven does compete with NYC on restaurant-style pizza though.
Your post and comment in this thread were a truly depressing read.
> I think what's interesting here is it's likely the first instance where Tesla FSD has been involved in an accident which affected other drivers.

In a pileup like this it's basically never the fault of the front car, unless maybe if they are purposely causing the accident for insurance fraud or something. Maybe the driver will get cited for failing to maintain the minimum speed, but legally this isn't much different than if someone backed into the Tesla while it was parked in a parking garage.
Hah, I could tell because in the "feature matrix" the Hudi column was mostly green compared to the others. Immediately made me suspicious so I looked it up and sure enough, not exactly an unbiased source.

Feature matrices are extremely easy to game depending on your choice of rows.
if they do, so what? even if 10 people cut in front of you, with a 30 minute drive, how much time are you really losing? 50 seconds?