skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Despite the the title itself not being news, there is an insight in this (short) article and it IS worth actually reading IMHO.

https://archive.ph/vmmFi

I wonder if anyone is doing a study into the particulars on the three groups to try and find common characteristics to guide future prescription? The cynic in me assumes not as that would reduce demand so why would a manufacturer fund such a study? But perhaps I am over cynical.

Speculating wildly for a moment, think that misdiagnosis is one likely reason. Maybe anti-depressants work on depression (the disease), but do not work on (say) CPD (where depression is just a symptom). Of course actually correctly diagnosing people will be time consuming and expensive. And I personally am not convinced we actually have a good grip on what diseases exist in mental health but that is another whole discussion...
Yes! Use Tailwind for the "U"
He does provide for an exception for them[1].

[1] >Extenuating circumstances aside (dyslexia, English language learners, etc.), if job hopefuls can’t distinguish between “to” and “too,” their applications go into the bin.
Catholicism is weird. (I say this as a Catholic.) St Lucy holding her gouged-out eyeballs, relics (super old pieces of human bodies), etc. Everywhere you look, there’s something quite strange. And the deeper you go, the stranger it all is. I love it, though.
No, the other way round. Well, actually it depends on your aesthetic canons.
> I just read that MS is looking to use it in its office suite.

Oh no, a potentially more annoying "Mr Clippy" on the horizon.
On Emergent Microcosms: Unspooling Entire Worlds with Code
I do this using PHP. It gets the template file, the data and off you go.
That is a key difference. You can’t easily and cheaply rent an auto factory, but you’re starting to be able to rent an LLM training factory once for a model where you can then more cheaply run inference on.
Picked up zig a few days ago - similar experience.

The build system and c-interop is amazing, targeting any arch/os from such a small toolchain makes me never want to use makefiles or even cmake again. The language itself definitely has a learning curve tho. Found myself fighting the syntax and needing some common things like sscanf often.

Btw kristoff's 4 part tutorial was really useful to integrate c libs: https://zig.news/kristoff/compile-a-c-c-project-with-zig-368...
Funnily enough, TDD comes out of very interactive environments of Smalltalk
> Is it just me or has the underlying purpose and value of “cascading” in CSS been lost within these abstractions.

For app-like websites CSS cascade offers little and is often harmful as an innocent change to a top layer will unpredictably cascade down to everything below.

> at the expense of having consistency and maintainability.

Compared to what. Every single website devolves into a nightmare of incomprehensible class names, or one-off CSS-in-JS solutions everywhere.

Compared to that the actually consistent names enforced by Tailwind are both consistent and maintainable.
If the benefit of adding a new employee is lower than the burden within the organisation that adding them causes, it sounds a lot like a concurrency issue more than an headcount issue as such.

What they're describing seems to be too many people working on the overlapping/interacting projects and relying heavily on synchronous communication (which they can't even schedule, talk about contention!) to move.

If the teams were better isolated, given more autonomy and asynchronous communication between them encouraged then things would probably go a lot more smoothly.

So I think it's less of a headcount issue and more of a structure issue. But I suppose it also depends on what work is available and what the integration requirements are as well, depending on what they've got this might not be possible.
Flights Across US Grounded by Notice to Air Missions System Bug
Tailwind is much, much faster than building your own stylesheets with deeper abstractions.

In most cases, it is faster to use Tailwind than customizing an existing UI framework.

SCSS and CSS in JS are more complex solutions than Tailwind.

Maintainability is generally better with Tailwind because you don’t need to remember all of your abstractions and any hidden structures, eg this div.className always needs to be nested a certain way. Onboarding is trivial because Tailwind can be mastered in two afternoons.

Tailwind might not be for everyone, but the features it provides allow for rapid development and easy maintenance. The author has issues with Tailwind in React, but these seem mire like React complexity than Tailwind.
Out of curiosity, have you used Tailwind and does your criticism come from having used it and not experiencing the progress or does your criticism come from reading how it works and not "feeling" it? I don't intend to follow up with discussion that convinces/dissuades/criticizes you in any way, I just ask purely out of curiosity.
The research is still ongoing, although perhaps lower-profile than what appears in the press.

RETRO did get press, but it was not the first retrieval model, and in fact was not SOTA when it got published; FiD was, which later evolved into Atlas[0], published a few months ago.

[0]: https://github.com/facebookresearch/atlas
> Is it just me or has the underlying purpose and value of “cascading” in CSS been lost within these abstractions.

I think you have a point. I think the cascading part was ignored for containment purposes during authoring, so it would scale and be predictable for larger teams. But ideally, I think we'd want to author using something like utility classes (or repeated style props?), but then compile them away to abstractions that cascade accordingly during runtime (least amount of kB sent over-the-wire as there would be as few as possible duplicated classes in the HTML, but also presuming that browsers using the cascade is more runtime performant than applying lots of atomic utility classes..?). Then we'd get abstractions without the cost of dealing with author-time abstractions (and having to name them). But then again.. there would then be a disconnect between what CSS classes you see when you author and what you see when you inspect the HTML/DOM... At least the utility classes are 1-to-1...
That example doesn't use shorthands to be more clear, and shows the styled utility function which is a more advanced case of wanting to define a group of styles nicely. Which is incidentally fixing a couple of the problems in TFA.

If you just want the simple Tailwind experience you can use shorthands only in those, or even closer just import <Stack /> or <Text /> directly and use shorthands with typed tokens. It's there in a few of the first examples.

The upside there is they are just regular props that are typed and have object de-structure and re-structure.

import { Stack } from 'tamagui'

<Stack p="$2" mx="$1" bc="red" />
Y'all ain't work on projects with NO docs and no OG devs. I'll take an outdated Google doc over nothing and day of the week.
Your quote and this one are both real gems.

> We also looked at roles that were being cut from our headcount and saw opportunities for our team to contribute in areas where leaders wanted full-time team members but couldn't make those hires due to budget constraints.

Corporate bullshit speak for, we fired people without realising what they were actually contributing and then things started to fall apart, but we can't hire replacements, so we came up with this idea.
https://github.com/karpathy/nanoGPT#i-only-have-a-macbook

> This creates a much smaller Transformer (4 layers, 4 heads, 64 embedding size), runs only on CPU, does not torch.compile the model (torch seems to give an error if you try), only evaluates for one iteration so you can see the training loop at work immediately, and also makes sure the context length is much smaller (e.g. 64 tokens), and the batch size is reduced to 8. On my MacBook Air (M1) this takes about 400ms per iteration. The network is still pretty expensive because the current vocabulary is hard-coded to be the GPT-2 BPE encodings of vocab_size=50257. So the embeddings table and the last layer are still massive. In the future I may modify the code to support simple character-level encoding, in which case this would fly. (The required changes would actually be pretty minimal, TODO)
https://archive.ph/evgS5
I've had good experiences using Upduino 3.0 and 3.1 [0] with the IceStorm tools via apio [1]. I wrote a blog post [2] with some info on getting things set up via Linux. All you need is the Upduino board, which interfaces to your host system via USB (so no special programmer is needed).

[0] https://tinyvision.ai/products/upduino-v3-1

[1] https://github.com/FPGAwars/apio

[2] https://daveho.github.io/2021/02/07/upduino3-getting-started...
There are also significant consequences and side effects to having a 'free market', they are called externalities and in the case of fossil fuels they lead to huge unconsidered costs.

I'm putting 'free market' in quotes, because even beyond externalities, the current system with zonal uniform pricing is only 'free' for a very narrow view of what constitutes a commodity or a marginal cost.

Consider two households: (a) in northern Germany close to the Danish border, located in a small town with lots of local wind turbine capacity, (b) in Southern Bavaria with very limited renewable energy production close by. There's also no adequate power transport infrastructure to get the renewable energy from the North (or elsewhere in Europe) to household (b), mostly because local politicians in Bavaria oppose putting up any visible infrastructure, whether power lines or wind turbines).

Now, during peak wind hours, a significant portion of the wind turbines in the north will go offline because the network cannot handle the load, while household (b) still needs to get their power from gas. [This is not a contrived example, but reality in Germany.] Yet (a) and (b) both pay the same price -- that of the gas producer. How is this a 'free' market?

But to your point, the good news is that people are taking electricity market design very seriously, not lightly. (Section 6 of this white paper is a good read that outlines many of the current market inefficiencies (Disclaimer: my former academic advisor and a few former colleagues are coauthors)): https://synergie-projekt.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Elect...
Ask HN: How do I write good documentation?
I got a freelance job recently, that wants me to write documentation for a static site hosting platform, the thing is, I've never written or even edited a documentation before. how should I go about it? any tips?
Google is threatened by LLMs because they're going to improve and Google's advantages can be overcome, and because LLMs are going to completely ruin the things Google indexes (you can already see the damage from content farms, bots, etc), meaning fewer eyeballs on their ads.
Historically these cars were made to be “ugly” because car makers were afraid to eat into sales of their regular cars. You could see it across the board ranging from the Honda Insight, to the Prius, to BMW’s weird looking i series cars.

There was never a reason, aerodynamic or not, to make the design look so ridiculous except if you’re the GM of the 3 Series or S class you don’t want someone else eating into your sales with a different product line.
So if I see it right that would be a p4d.24xlarge instance. Which goes for about $32.77 an hour nowadays so the total training would be about $1245. Not cheap, but certainly not a nation state budget.

Edit: i just noticed lambda lab. It seems they ask $8.8 per hour for an instance of this caliber. That puts the total training cost around $334. I wonder how come it is that much cheaper.
They already do that with the existing system.

It often happened in Spain (pre Iberian exception) that gas isn't even used, but the price of hydro was set to something like (expected price of gas - 5 €) because they knew they could. So we end up paying the price of gas even when we don't use gas!

Honestly, some people talk about the existing system as if it's this perfect free market... but in practice the bar is very low.

The Iberian exception system is already showing in practice that it works better.
tbh, tailwind feels like the worst thing that happened to frontend dev since coffee script.
"I won't read articles published on websites using poor URL shortening techniques. Here is why." :-)
alright, i'll bite..

am a happy user of Itsycal[2], and the form factor..

some context as to how I use the same, for my biases will be clear:

1. mostly see today's and tomorrow's events

2. click on event -> click on video conferencing link -> browser opens :)

this is, different.

1. default view is BIG.. without the calendar events to start off. with the calendar events, this is take up half your screen big.

2. only event names are shown, which is fine, until you consider that all the names are cropped and you can only see the "(first 5 chars) ... (last 5 chars)<space>(calendar name)" (this might be an issue long calendar names) [1]

3. events are not actionable in any form, which doesn't help when you need to get information, like, the meeting location, or video conferencing link.

---

my initial thoughts: i'm not the target audience here. that said, good luck :)

[1] https://imgur.com/a/QW0Tqxz
[2] https://www.mowglii.com/itsycal/
Intel Xeon CPU Max Series
I was curious about how much this would be to rent, because definitely the cost of those servers is outside the budget! Lambda has 8xA100 40gb for $8.80/hr: https://lambdalabs.com/service/gpu-cloud#pricing
Not for drawing.
Yeah I don't care for extra watts there, I want it run fast
The NOTAM system is embarrassing. This just tops it off. Actually, our whole ATC system and the way the FAA operates is embarrassing. It all works kind of like waste management in NYC. If they were to add new tech and efficiency, fewer people would have jobs, so we keep doing it the old way to the detriment of everyone else.
If I could submit a "Love" symbol for this comment, know that I would.
This should be called "Don't use Tailwind in a React library for a design system" as this really has nothing to do with Tailwind and is all about integration of Tailwind into a React design system.

None of these "negatives" are "negatives" for using it as part of a standard HTML/CSS website outside of React. The comparison between readability of a bunch of divs and web components or react makes no sense, of course <SidebarItem /> is easier to read then <div class="flex-1 bg-blue font-bold, text-md d:none"></div> but nobody writes React like that. Everyone will have a SidebarItem component that spits out that div.
Oh on that one, there's no problem, gas powered cars are going to be extinct very soon so gasoline will be cheap for those still willing to use them due to low demand, and electric cars are already mainstream.
Yes!, Jetbrains works very well to.
What's the applicability? Can you give me some examples of what can be used this for?
Another (even smaller) alternative is `.join`

`const classes = [some, classNames, here, foo ? 'foo' : ''].join(' ');`
Yes, the problem is in the "until my life circumstances improved". In your case they either improved on their own, or you don't talk about the possibly large amount of work you did to improve them. In my understanding (but it's not my field) the criticism is precisely of when antidepressants are used without a proper plan on that side.
Please stop spreading such nonsense. They don't have "a habit of targeting the middle income" people because they are low hanging fruits. They currently target middle income people because the lack the funds to go after the affluent and the wealthy and the obscenely rich.

That's what the additional funds is trying to rectify.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-20/super-ric...
Can you explain how open-ui solves the problem? I went on the website, and to be fair I didn't really get it, but say for <breadcrumb /> component they give a proposal of what the HTML would look like in their proposed solution with nav, ok, li elements. How does this replace the idea of having a breadcrumb web component which is a higher level abstraction?
> The use case for the meme database is slightly different: it's to find that meme you saw somewhere else.

The whole idea is that whenever you find a meme you like you save it, so all search is still local
This is definitely ChatGPT
"Gibberish"? That's smart. I just blow raspberries down the phone until it says "I'll put you through to an assistant". But sometimes it thinks it found some signal in the noise and it will say things like "is this about your credit card? Please say yes or no".
Stage Manager for the unimpressed: 1 Getting started
I checked my 5 year old repository of ~300 stars. It has a ~100 unique clones a month. So if the average was half of it then the 1 order of magnitude would be quite an accurate approximation.

I think the biggest difference with a clone and a star is that a star requires an account and some vested interest in the social network of Github. Anyone who is not interested in the social aspect can just bookmark it.

I guess this differs quite a lot by target demographic. A tool for GPT will probably get a lot more stars than a plugin for some consumer software simply because it is more targeted for the audience of people who have Github accounts.
"if job hopefuls can’t distinguish between “to” and “too,”

Why do English speakers consistently label spelling mistakes as "grammar" mistakes? Doesn't English have a distinction between spelling and grammar?
If you want something like hypercard this looks cool: https://internet-janitor.itch.io/decker

There's a link to a browser version there too
That's hilarious, I thought it was supposed to be scribbles lol... scruples makes more sense. But I guess this just further emphases what I said. I am a native English speaker and I had no item what 6 samples were saying...
I would never trust Siri or Alexa for an answer that actually mattered. The population of Budapest or tomorrow's weather, sure. The correct torque for my wheel nuts or whether it's legal to carry a gun in ____, hell no.
If only there were some source of dispatchable energy with a total annual limit in ontario and quebec, or some way of averaging the power from different renewable sources in different neighboring place.
"and if it’s all in your head "

Erm yeah, mental problems are literally all in your head. That doesn't make them less real, though. And of course, toughen up is a stupid thing to say from someone not having those problems. (on the other hamd, you can take I am sick as a excuse to not make an effort anymore)

And if the chemicals are not in order still leaves the question whether that is just the symptom or the root cause.

What I mean is, that when someone has a shitty life and is therefore depressed, then his brain chemicals are probably not look good. Pills still might help this person to transition back, but this won't be sustainable, when the root cause does not get fixed.
Looks like old 8-bit computers. I remember this from my days of Machine Code, and that was a long time ago.

Wonder when this was written? I would guess mid-1980s; maybe earlier.

Back then, we were all a lot closer to the hardware.
Just wait a year and see how many doctors are jobless vs how many ex-FAANGS
Should we do more comparisons to no treatment? (Placebo is not "no treatment", that's why we have placebo effect.) Three cohorts, medication, placebo medication, no treatment. There must have been studies like this?

This metastudy seems to say they have no evidence of a placebo effect, though. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12535498/
Automated deletion is something that has always made me very cautious, to the point that I usually opt to have my code send a notification to myself or the team saying “it’s time to delete x and y” instead of letting the system perform the deletion on its own. In some lower-risk cases, I’ll eventually automate the deletion, but only after a long period of time with no false positives. This strategy has served me well over the years, helping identify edge cases that would have been problematic.
Public keys are not PII though, unlike your real name.
i copy/pasted the parent comment into chatgpt
That's a great comparison. For a real number, I just checked Runpod and you can rent a system with 8xA100 for $17/hr or ~$700 for 38 hours. Not cheap, but also pretty close to the cost of renting a premium vehicle for a few days. I've trained a few small models by renting an 1xA5000 system and that only costs $0.44/hr, which is perfect for learning and experimentation.
Busy at the moment, but send me a message at samuelwanderson45 @ gmail . com and I'll try to get back to you
Any thoughts about OpenTelemetry ? That covers both logs, tracing and metrics
Yep, the situation has changed since the post was made. Parent comment was correct at the time, however.

At 5:40am Eastern, the agent at my departure gate told us that there was a ground stop affecting all flights, which was reflected in my original title. This was not reflected in the NOTAM I posted, as was pointed out by several early commenters, and in fact my flight was able to board and depart around 7:00am Eastern before the ground stop took effect.
I changed it, for whatever good that would do (But I thought my "click bait" title was pretty funny, and pretty much nailed the subject).
Same reason a whole English speaking country also says "on accident" instead of "by accident" and "I could care less" instead of "I couldn't care less"... lack of critical thinking and momentum.
Left field advice here, but I'd recommend helping out on a movie, or even making your own short. If you want to understand film literally nothing comes close. This sounds intimidating, but it's no more of a bar than attending a local Kino Cabaret Event [1] or similar. If you work on a film through production - even a simple two day shoot and edit, you'll start to build an intuition for how the medium works. The more you participate in creating it, the more you'll understand film in its native language. There's a strong analogy to learning to programme / basic hacking projects -> understanding software and hardware.

In as much as film appreciation courses and youtube critical videos can be interesting, or draw your attention to things you've missed, they're usually from an external interpretive lens. An example of where they can miss the point is Noam Baumbach's latest film 'White Noise' which is has been critically misunderstood [2]. Meanwhile all the filmmakers I know are in awe of it technically and structurally.

1 - http://kinokabaret.org/

2 - https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/white_noise_2022
Probably, I don't know if GC can be that precise and timely. But nonetheless my point actually was that this is more inevitable to happen in case of immutable datastructures than with lock-free or mutex-ey sharded design.