skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Plan9/9Front is maintained and OpenVMS comes out for x64 ~Mai ;)

You just have to use it.
Threema had 9 years to migrate to something more standard like the Signal protocol, given the findings in the article, that would have been a great idea.

In their defense, they're a comparably tiny company, so a full protocol rewrite might be too much of cost to keep their investors happy.
I sold a domain once in Sedo.
They do parking and have listing for owned domains.
Another option is Flippa: develop a simple site and list it.
I haven't seen many organisations actually set SSH PAM via LDAP or another delegated authentication system.

You are right about the problem statement. It is distributed authorization problem. And it is a very hard problem to solve or visualize for a fast moving company unless it is a problem.
The first video game I played was Pokémon blue, created by a Japanese game studio, and the most recent was Elden Ring, created by another.

Sony and Nintendo are two of the world’s biggest companies, and a key part of their business model is creating great games franchises, either in house or working with local studios.

This is all driven by an ecosystem of great software companies, making the best games in the world (or at the least, outside of America).
My services have three password rules:
1. the password has to be a certain length (8 or more)

2. the password is not allowed to be in the list of the most common passwords

3. username, email or similar is not allowed to be in the password
Amazon built its own last mile delivery network, and the air freight middle mile in the US (also I wasn't even remotely involved in that), for one simple reason: growth. Up until a few years ago, Amazon happily relied on existing carriers. And then Amazon's growth, together with eCommerce growth in general, required massive investment by said carriers. Amazon did some matgs (over simplifying), and came to the conclusion, that for the amount it would have to invest into increased third party carrier capacity it can built in house capacity. And the risk is negligible, since internal networks will handle only so much of the volume.

UPS, FedEx, DHL and company are perfrctly able to do last mile deliveries. Some are better in some regions than others.

Back the day, Amazon Germany was DHLs biggest global customer. So yes, existon carriers will feel if all their business goes to Amazon logistics. Which it won't, because of risk diversification, and a ton of other reasons.
How does it work towards juries? Can it emotionally connected to juries and convince them?
If poor people can only get the bot, that means the Constitution was changed. I don’t see how that could be the tech’s fault. It’s more likely that the AI would free up public defenders from things like having to answer their clients’ questions, as they could just ask the AI, allowing them to be more effective.
Sure, but the "I don't want to get something" comes from: "my system works for me, I don't need a change, it's being imposed on me".

Change that is evolutionary can be good, that little tweak that REMOVES pain that you maybe don't even notice but feel better.

There also can be change that is imposed by either product managers who have run out of ideas and need to anything to stay relevant or also by designers who don't use the product themselves but find lets say large padding to be aesthetically pleasing. For them the disruption is not felt, the information density is not lost. It looks good on a powerpoint slide.
This looks cool, it's a shame guile doesn't compile for mingw64 for windows...
> But this is how it always goes with religions. There is never a definitive core belief or core morality that everyone agrees with.

The vast majority of Christians would say that belief in the existence of God is a core belief of Christianity. They'd say an atheist is by definition not a believer in Christianity. And, up until the 20th century, there was universal agreement on this. Then, along came some people who claimed they could be "Christian atheists". However, even today, those people are a tiny minority of (self-described) Christians, the vast majority of Christians don't accept that as a valid form of Christianity. In fact, even most non-Christians, even most atheists, don't accept that as a valid form of Christianity. I expect you'll find Christian atheists to be greatly outnumbered by those atheists who consider "Christian atheism" to be a silly oxymoron.

Similarly, in Buddhism, up until the 20th century, pretty much everyone agreed that rebirth was a literal phenomenon – not just some kind of metaphor – and that was seen as a core belief of Buddhism – they would say that a person who does not believe in literal rebirth, by definition does not believe in Buddhism. Nowadays, there are a lot of people – especially in the West – who disagree with that, and think that "there is no afterlife, rebirth is just a metaphor" is a perfectly legitimate variety of Buddhist belief – however, I'd be surprised if people who define "Buddhism" so broadly are any more than a small minority of all Buddhists globally.
Clients not following their advice is always going to happen, and it's not the lawyer's problem as you say. And indeed, the lawyer can't (and historically in many jurisdictions shouldn't be creating compensation structures which imply they can) guarantee the outcome.

I agree the defendant is likely to be on their own, and I'm wondering whether the individual concerned is aware of this. The company seems to be willing to backstop their ticket if they lose.

I'm not sure that will help much if they are sent to jail for a few days for wasting court time for relatedly lying under oath or talking themselves into a generative AI's web of inaccurate statements. Such a follow-up suit would be both hilarious and interesting to follow indeed.
DB migrations should definitely not be done interactively and definitely not in an SSH session. Write them beforehand, have them reviewed with the rest of the code, and have your deployment process run them.
My favourite is when you enter a long password, and it fails with the error message "Your password must contain special characters" or some other message that nothing to do with the condition that is not met.
Why do you think Alan Cox said the following:

“Linus is a good developer, but is a terrible engineer. I'm sure that he'll agree with me.”

:)
If I recall, one of the duties of the pilots (usually the first officer's) is to keep track of fuel levels and consumption throughout the flight so any anomalies in the engine or fuel system can hopefully be found sooner.

If a human can do it, I would imagine a computer could automate the process. Likely wouldn't remove the need for the pilots to do it anyway, though; redundancy and reliability and all that.
Yes, I was thinking the same. It will of course still be much more expensive than a flat wall but paying for a digital sculptor + a robot reproducing the work fast and repeatedly will reduce costs significantly
Amazing work by the author of the Common Lisp Cookbook.
I've hesitated to get into CL for months, but seeing about all the activity going on, I'm in for 2023.
I agree with you. But you are viewing it from a web application centric organisation. There are lot of other types of organisations out there, for eg. a company that uses vendor products and now has to give access to servers, databases etc. to the vendor.

The scenarios you need access to the downstream resources is mainly for doing ops on them. Other things such as viewing logs can is predictable and can be exposed via some tool to developers.
I'd suggest that being just extremely good at war might be not quite enough. Even being the best might be not enough. It would suggest a victory but it still might be too costly. Look at Ukraine-Russia war, for example. It seems with western support Ukraine's victory all but guaranteed but because of small margin of superiority the war is approaching a year, loss is counted in 5 figures for men and billions of dollars for property. Russia still seem to hope to win because it has advantage in certain areas (e.g. troop numbers, nukes). If USA barged in in the first weeks of the war and made full might of its military available to Ukraine there would be no war by now (or there would be WW3 but that's not the point). The more obvious military superiority the shorter any conflict would be or there would be no military conflict in the first place.

In a way, it's cheaper to buy expensive F35s (providing jobs for those who build them and for those who shoot patriotic clips for election campaigns) and show how big your stick is than to be drawn into a war with F16s and just barely win it.

Another aspect is that the technology has to actually improve and that's expensive. Russian propaganda, for instance, was peddling Russian military superiority for decades. Putin kept saying "no analogues" at every opportunity. But it was just propaganda. They were trying to do it on the cheap. On the field they actually resort to WW2 era equipment.
"I benefitted from a Ponzi scheme and you should too"...for every person who cashed out from something technically worthless, there are many others that lost their shirts too...this isn't a valid argument.
> * being physical is actually an advantage (easier to secure in a way that they can understand and verify). *

Because gold is physical it is not easy to transport, and can more easily be seized by the government -- both of which make it a worse store of value. It is also worse because its supply growth rate is higher, which means that if you hold gold you are losing more value every year (absent changes in demand) than if you hold Bitcoin. In fact, we know exactly what Bitcoin's total supply count will be, whereas with Gold we do not. If BTC gains mass adoption, then it will be the best store of value that we have.
> Can we get AI to help us find loopholes in bureaucracy that plutocrats try to exploit in order to keep the working classes down?

Those are not exactly a secret. The entire reason for those loopholes to exist is for the rich to be able to exploit/use them.
You're a bank. Three of your regulators
(a) Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(b) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(c) Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
release a "Joint Statement on Crypto-Asset Risks to Banking Organizations". It contains the following text:

"Based on the agencies current understanding and experience to date, the agencies believe that issuing or holding as principal crypto-assets that are issued, stored, or transferred on an open, public, and/or decentralized network, or similar system is highly likely to be inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices. Further, the agencies have significant safety and soundness concerns with business models that are concentrated in crypto-asset-related activities or have concentrated exposures to the crypto-asset sector."

The Joint Statement is dated January 3, 2023.

So, after this warning, what's your next move.

(This thread is hilarious. The title has now changed twice.)
They have no business locking it down and preventing people from implementing higher-quality cameras, which would only add value to the Pi camera-interface "stack" anyway. No matter how you slice it, it's anti-community and encourages someone to come along and undermine the entire platform... which would REALLY squander the investment made.
While I agree that technology is the solution I disagree AI has anything to do with this.

This "AI Lawyer" is about a traffic ticket. If we want to make things more fair while also enforcing the laws on the book it seems like the more straightforward tech solution is to improve traffic cameras/monitors such that tickets are given out more appropriately. Or, if it still goes to court, why not just have a system where someone can represent themselves with a form or checklist which points out the reasons they were given a ticket by mistake?

Perhaps this is a good business model in the current system but its definitely not the best for society as a whole. Why do we need lawyer of any type to handle something as banal as speeding tickets?
This post had its title changed from "telemetry.optIn defaults to true" (which is the headline) to "Telemetry settings in Kibana" which is somewhat useless as a headline. What's the big deal?
One advantage that gas stoves have is that they don't need electricity to cook, so if your batteries or generators fail, you can still prepare a meal while you wait for the power to be restored.
The problem is that if you stop increasing the supply, then you're relying entirely on transaction fees to reward miners.

But transaction fees are determined based on supply and demand for transactions, not based on how much value on the chain is secured by them.

These are only tangentially related, and the strategy of 'store of value' makes them even less well coupled.

Unless there is high demand for transacting, then the economic pressure will be for the cost of attacking the chain to come down, and double spending the value stored on the chain will increasingly become more appealing than transaction fees.

The current equilibrium relies on the supply increasing.
Thanks for clarifying. Pretty much what I meant but not a native speaker so probably worded it a little bad.
A page pulled right out of the anti encryption talking points book. Im glad we agree that you oppose my financial privacy. Redistribution of consequences is fantastic. Surely you support the patriot act too right? Or is that too much consistency to expect out of you?
Since 2015 I have been thinking how to explore information as a 3D structure. This thought has led to developing plurid [1], [2], a component library (for React for now) to transform a web page into a rotate-able/translate-able/scale-able space with the content on planes.

[1] Code, https://github.com/plurid/plurid

[2] Demo, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aV7MWFDVFkk
mod/trad makes sense to me; thank you for the clarification — with just the bare link it was not at all clear what was supposed to be of interest!

> I believe what really happens in history is this: the old man is always wrong, and the young people are always wrong about what is wrong with him. The practical form it takes is this: that, while the old man may stand by some stupid custom, the young man always attacks it with some theory that turns out to be equally stupid. —GKC

(and the US context is just plain odd — some of the most vocal backers of "The Constitution is Divinely Inspired" dogma are not even protestant christian: they are Mormon)
> I have only ever eaten food when I’m actually hungry

That's very good for you, be glad your genetics / environment enable you to not be hungry, as stupid as it sounds. I'm always hungry, I can always just eat until my belly hurts (with regrets after). I'm under control, do a lot of high intensity cardio and muscle training to increase my total metabolism and practice strong discipline to not overeat. I'm thin with some nice muscles now, but as soon as I let myself go and let "nature" take over, I'll gain weight again because I'm hungry and always was. I'm not complaining, my genetics / environment enabled me to do other things most other people can't do. Life is not fair and the universe owes us nothing.
(a) is the nub of the question - the spiel from Japan at the time was that they had massively parallel hardware in the works that was on the cusp of delivery...

At the time I was tinkering about with a bunch of transputer boards, modding Minux, thinking about capabilities, and mangling Occam (the language) into something less awful (IMHO).

I was more curious about how this decade (roughly) long chapter in Japan's IT history didn't rate a mention in the authors article (aside from "Japan plowed ahead with hardware in the 80's" (IIRC) throw aways)
Documenting frameworks is a very important process in the object-oriented application framework development. It is a precondition to utilize a framework. Simple, accurate, easy-to-use, comprehensible, and effective documentation is the final goal of the framework documentation. https://www.homebargainsportal.com/
Clippy is coming back.
Make it broader - before take-off, pilots enter the expected destination (or expected distance). During cruising, computers keep track of how much fuel is being used (lost) per unit of time, and projects forward to see if they can still make their expected destination or not.

If the number does not reach within expected margins, then show an error.

This protects against leaks, but also miscalculation of fuel needed by the pilots, misfueling, or efficiency loss somehow.
where? can't find a function. I can only manually download the 10k files I have in the root folder each one in a single folder. one by one. there is not even a function to download bulk
there's quite a lot of lightning detector systems with nanosecond accuracy GPS onboard. Blitzortung.org is one network of such systems.

Should the gps data be shared between these two projects/networks?
The $3k wireless Displace TV is the definition of CES absurdity
That's a really common thing. In Polish copyright law, any license expires after five years by default unless it explicitly states that it's perpetual - which doesn't mean it becomes irrevocable at all (in fact, it's easier to revoke a perpetual license than a timed one).

That said, this is an open license rather than a regular two-sided contract, which makes a lot of things about it untested in courts and there are some pretty good legal arguments for considering it irrevocable flying around (just like in case of GPLv2, for example).
From the article:

> As Shatan noted, in a recent report on delivery companies’ performance, UPS came out on top, with an on-time-delivery rate of ninety-seven per cent.
Finiteness is not even necessary for value (ideas being the go-to example). Its necessary for a price (actually non-finite things are free, assuming they're produced in a free market).
Most people don't have the advantage/burden of three decades of experience with the tool. Make's only advantage as a task runner I see is being ubiquitous. If that isn't a concern, no reason to use upper Pleistocene Make that isn't even a task runner over a more ergonomic tool. Make is so warty I have yet to see a team using Makefiles not run into any of its idiosyncrasies, but with just? Smooth sailing. Just works. No surprises. I'm a fan.
The website is well crafted. Anyone has a list of more such non-generic sites with content by developers?
political solutions are a bandage until the technical solutions are invented
> my team is generally unfamiliar with coding, and if they are, aren’t up to date on best practices, as it is not their primary job.

Slightly off topic but this such a problem nowadays. Coding is everywhere now but it's treated like "it's only software", especially from people who are in more traditional engineering disciplines.

This is partly a cultural issue but it's also technical. Software engineering / coding workflows are expected to be roughly the same whenever there is coding involved. In classical engineering the processes and the mental models of how to develop a product are completely different to modern software engineering which creates the tooling vacuum that you describe.
I remember the feeling of sheer awe while watching both movies. "Wait, what, he is a metallic skeleton underneath?!! No goddamn way!!!". I really miss that feeling in today's movies, even "Avatar 2" by the same James Cameron. He replaced it with some gizmo gimmicks, like exoskeletons or crab sumbarines, which are impressive, but not awesome.
Another simple tool similar to this is makesure[1]. It’s written in shell so the idea is you include makesure itself in your repo, which avoids needing to install another tool to run commands on your project.

It’s very simple so isn’t good for everything, but works well as a simple command runner.

[1] https://github.com/xonixx/makesure
I don't believe it's oversimplifying the domain. Typically the reference I pointed to has a section dedicated to double descent (sec 11.2). You may also be surprised that such phenomenon can be observed on toy convex convex examples from "old theory" (sec 11.2.3), as you call it.

Anyways, I still believe that learning foundational stuff such as the bias-variance tradeoff is useful before diving to more advanced stuff. I even think that tackling recent research question with old tool is insightful too. But that's only my opinion, and perhaps I'm in denial :)
Or, how about: telemetry.enabled?
Did I say you have to buy too? No. I said people are very resentful that they missed out. "missed out" is past tense.
I am a bit confused about this product. I had once seen a product called Runops [1], the customer list and product testimonials are exactly same as this product Hoop.dev [2].
[1] https://runops.io/

[2] https://hoop.dev/
> that place was 38°C in my living room with all windows and doors open in the summer.

If your window is open you will have the same air temperature as outside, potentially higher. I saw a lot of that in my apartment block this summer. People don't have experience dealing with high temperatures, and intuitions they have are wrong.

What you want to do is

1. Open windows at night to create draft and cool down your dwelling.

2. During the day close windows and block sunlight as much as possible. Blocking sunlight on the outside of window is better than blocking it inside. If blocking inside with something like thermal curtains you may need to leave window a crack open. Sunhouse-like conditions may cause temperature next to window increse by a lot (60+) which is not good for glass.

3. (1) and (2) can be supplemented with AirCon, but it's not that popular in UK.
Architecture diagrams should be code
You're right, my generalization is too early. It is based on crypto's correlation with the overall stock market since it is seen as an investment, which has always returned positive over a 15 year period. But this is more speculation than anything else.
* public defenders

The defendant is the person on trial.
I think you're confusing market capitalization and (accounting) equity here. What the stock price does does not directly affect the balance sheet (where you see the equity).
What is your definition of decentralization? What is it based on?
I do see where the general objection to the "current kills" comes from, even if their reasoning got a bit muddled.

All else equal, twice the voltage yields twice the current (and 4x the power).

So while yes, it's the current that kills you, in the majority of circumstances high voltage = high current. Outside of explicitly current-limited setups (e.g. a Van de Graaff generator or a desktop ionizer), most higher voltage devices will kill you more easily.

And so the "voltage doesn't kill" meme more often than not (IMO) gives laymen an undue sense of safety when working with higher voltages, at the benefit of appealing to the more electrically-inclined crowds sense of "being precisely correct".

Just look at the dozens deaths a year from people messing with microwave transformers, trying to make some pretty wood lightning art, for an example of this.
Omfg and car screens universally have an input lag of over 1 second, so not only do i have to take my eyes off the road to interact with it but i have to extend my interaction by several more seconds for any multi step process. Screens might even be okay if it weren't for the input lag
The risk of CO from a gas hob should be trifling - at least, by comparison to a boiler.