skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is where per-user level encryption of data should be used. If your credit report on that site is encrypted and the keys are only successfully derived by answering your security questions, you've added another layer of security [1]. It also prevents the situation where a hacker gets access to the box doing the security check, and they can read everyone's data versus just those users who are concurrently asking for their reports.

Even simpler, this would be prevented if /acr/oow set a decryption key as a cookie after validating the verification data that was then used by /acr/report to decrypt your credit report.

[1] Yes, it's possible to enumerate over all user's security answers, so it's not perfect, but it ensures a simple mistake with an if condition, doesn't release everyone's data.
Sounds like you don't enjoy hardware in the first place... or maybe would enjoy something like PLC more than prototyping.

Once you get things in place making a PCB that connects modules neatly really isn't a big deal, especially if you use ready-made modules
I've seen people that are really good at playing organ play piano really well, but I've yet to come across a pianist that liked the organ. The lack of expression in the keys is what makes the organ a much harder instrument to play in a musically interesting way than the piano, but with the 'schwellwerk' you can offset some of that and you have endless combinations of stops to modify the tone and that's a big part of playing an organ (as well as the footwork).

There are some crazy good organists out there, and they definitely make them come to life in a way that people that don't have the organ as their main instrument would struggle with. I've been to some organ performances that were indeed boring and some that were out of this world, same organ!
According to the article, it's buildings with 2-4 units per floor that are significantly impacted by this rule. At 10 per floor, your building is a lot larger than the ones the article is talking about.
The only thing that the gaming industry needs to do is to boycott the new edition of D&D, and evolve the games which were originally based on OGL 1.0 content (e.g. "3.5" D&D) on a parallel track, ignoring all the OGL 1.1 things, explicitly foregoing any compatibility with D&D 6th edition (or whatever it will be called), and building up a thriving ecosystem of content which they are definitely capable of doing separately from WotC.
If you're in the US, you may want to try to find an episcopal church. They seem to be liturgically conservative enough to still have organs but are generally socially liberal enough to be more accepting. Ymmv, obviously.

But I will say that personally in years of playing the organ and asking random churches (including conservative ones) if I could borrow their organs on a quiet weekday, my bisexuality has never come up. And I didn't have to be friends with the choir director either. Once, I attended one Mass and just went up to him afterwards to thank him for playing (it was beautiful) and ask if I could ever practice with it.

I know it's different from many places as I'm in a big city, but at least four organists whom I've known personally are gay. Many churches don't even require you to be religious even to be employed to play the organ there. Randomly on an airplane, I spoke with an atheist music professor who was choir director/organist at a congregationalist church. They didn't seem to care. So I doubt it'd be a big deal if you just want to practice. The choir director at my current (liberal) parish never takes Communion--I don't know if he is personally religious one way or the other, but it seems to be little more than a job to him.

Also, you should try to find some churches where there is more than just "drab church hymns." 20th and even 21st century voluntaries, anthems, and choral preludes are alive and well in certain segments of Christendom. See for instance the churches that Bálint Karosi plays in. I doubt you'd describe his music as "drab." My parish runs the gamut from Palestrina to something from the 20th century at least every Sunday. Just my 2 cents.
Helps if one isn't too familiar with the source material. With my Marvel experience prior to MCU limited to a bunch of animated shows I watched as a kid, I left the cinema furious after watching Captain America: Civil War - I was pissed at them showcasing and then destroying S.H.I.E.L.D., the one thing I actually found most interesting in the whole setting. It was a moment of genuine, deep surprise, as I had no idea how they planned to recover from losing - what I believed to be - a critical piece of the setting.

Couple more MCU movies and now I know better how this genre works :).
What do you mean by clean in this context?
I know about Pathfinder, but I don't understand this:

> It is my understanding, however, that Pathfinder Second Edition is pretty much a full rewrite and only includes the OGL as a way for third parties to build content around Pathfinder Second Edition.

Why did Paizo use a license not designed by them? And if they did a full rewrite, are they under any obligation at all to Wizards of the Coast? If they used the OGL to allow third-parties for Pathfinder, not D&D, what does this have to do with WotC? And cannot they simply switch to another license, if 2nd edition is truly a full rewrite?

There's something I'm definitely missing here.
A single developer dropped AWS costs by 90%, then disappeared
Ask HN: Ways to make minimal amounts of money, working on what you love
I have a funny situation.

- I'm a fulltime software engineer stuck in a boring role

- I have RSI in both forearms, so programming time is limited to work hours to minimize pain (which sucks because programming was my hobby and now I can't work on my projects after work, otherwise I get worse RSI)

My goal: make at least a very minimal amounts of money (say 10k $USD/year) to sustain myself, while being able to work a solid 4-5 hours daily on programming projects that I am passionate about.

I spent some time trying to figure out ways to make this work, without much success. Which is why I came here, maybe some people are in the same situation and were able to figure out a way to be able to continue working on their passions despite RSI?
>>I can see a regulation that mandates that you wire any new residences up so they can support gigabit, but how is this going to work if the municipality / ISP does not offer it?

If read the article, it says the cap is 2000 pounds, so the developer must do all the make-ready work in the house to support 1G internet, but they only have to actually connect to the fastest option available - and then only if the total cost of that is under the 2000 cap.

So it's something, but I suspect many places that are out of luck now, will still be out of luck even with the new rules.
As annoying as it is, there is precedent for this opinion with RSS aggregator websites like Feedly. They discover new feed URLs when their users add them, and then keep auto-refreshing them without further explicit user interaction. They don't respect robots.txt either.
big words, obscure results
I've never met anyone who considered James Cameron to be other than a blockbuster factory. Aliens, the Abyss, True Lies, writing the second Rambo film... who the hell would be surprised that James Cameron was involved with a Terminator movie?

Aside form that, Terminator 2 not only isn't Cameron's best effort, it's not even the franchise's best effort. It was the beginning of "to hell with making sense, look at these explosions," which got worse with each passing film, and better in the Sarah Conner Chronicles.
I've done a lot of ultralight backpacking. That community is, in general, on the more liberal/hippie side of the spectrum. One of the funniest things I noticed however is that the far other end, the doomsday-preppers, start to share a lot of the same tools and food. For example I was making my own freeze-dried meals, and most of the sites where you could buy the food were targeted towards preppers. A little bit of if you go so far right (or left) you end up on back on the other side.
Calling a GPL-licensed piece of software with nontrivial public contribution "a Facebook product" is begging the question.
Sure, since they made most of their money from paid products, they had the advantage of telling consumers we won't collect your data, and it was a powerful attack on FB and Google's business models. It was a powerful differentiator, and it worked with people like me.

It's a case where a business motivations line up with their customers (like how FB and Google's motivations to collect data lined up with their customers motivations to get free stuff).

But if they're breaking that now, that's a huge problem.
The commenter you're responding to is talking about Lovelace architecture based GeForce RTX 40x0 products. The Quadro line isn't even released yet on this architecture. You are talking about the specific Quadro RTX 4000 product, which is a TU104 (turing arch, 2 gens behind, with 2560 processors and 8GB memory). The commenter you're responding to is referring to something like a GeForce RTX 4090 which sports an AD102 (lovelace arch, with 16384 processors and 24GB memory).

You were merely an unfortunate casualty of Nvidia's product marketing scheme (and a commenter's slightly imprecise reference to it) here.
I used to work for another company where it's acceptable for people to move from management to IC roles (and I wish it were possible everywhere).

They're going to do it anyway, whether it's going back to being an IC at the same company or by leaving to do it elsewhere. If it's not possible to stay they're just going to go (and presumably these are the people considered good enough to promote into management).
URI fragments being client side are entirely their point. Clients should never send them to the server.
As Kenny Paterson points out, on behalf of the research group, the's "the old Threema protocol" in large part because of the work they did, which makes the "old protocol" thing pretty hollow.
My interpretation was always that the do-nothing script was just a starting point - once you have it, you can gradually start automating the steps.

Once the script actually automates a few of the more tedious steps, people are much more likely to use it. And when they use it, they're likely to help maintain it when new situations need it.

Eventually, you may end up with a script that does automate it all, and can be put in CI/CD. (Hey, I can dream, can't I?)
I maintain a list of well-known or foundational papers in ML in a github repo that may be of interest to readers of this thread

https://github.com/daturkel/learning-papers
I stuck with the Bodum brand mentioned above. This stainless, huge-ass, french press has served me well for about a decade now after I broke my second glass model. https://www.bodum.com/us/en/1312-16-bodum-columbia
If you 'pull' the aeropress slightly at the beginning, you can create a vacuum which stops the initial drip, making the normal method potentially preferable.
Considering that DP lazily sampled entire hooks, still pretty run of the mill.
Indeed--at this point zstd is the product of something like 25 man-years of improvements and optimizations.
This is a lovely example of HN pedanticism.
You have to try to put yourself in a world where most computers were room-sized,a and there wasn't even anything smaller than what used to be called a "mini-computer" -- more-or-less a very large tower -- and no individual had one of their own. This was also 3 years before 2001's HAL 9000, so even before the idea of even talking to a computer was anywhere near the public consciousness. In that context, it's not too surprising that people had trouble understanding what they were talking to. OTOH, it's not actually entirely clear that JW's interpretation of what was going on in these folks' mind is correct. I mean, we rubber duck all the time...sometimes to a literal rubber duck (although usually in that case just to be funny)...so telling this inanimate thing your deepest secrets might be just a way to get them off your chest. We don't know, but my point is that it's hard to try to think about what someone in 1960 might have thought when asking to talk to a computer that was asking them seemingly intimate questions.
I think that's just because it is recent.

But there is plenty more.
This is a very nomenclature-focused essay. But the names are still relatively salient for modern use. Relatively.
Fate of Atlantis would have made such a good movie almost scene by scene.

I don't think you need pee tapes when you can literally shower them with gold.
The phrase "any authorized version" is what people are worried about here, because the 1.1 leak includes language indicating that 1.0 is no longer authorized.
Maybe yes, I will try that. I wanted to try the OpenAI product that does speech to text so it may be a good opportunity! I won't solve the problem for diagrams which are a big part, but that's already good progress.

> The only other thing I can think of is, maybe you are too stressed to write words down? From what you said, it sounds like you are very anxious about making a mistake.

Not really. I am stressed because I don't make progress, and while I still hit the deadlines it's making it tight.

I don't hesitate to go back and correct, or even delete entire parts. It's not really about the content, more about the format.

As an example, I used this document as a reference to write another one last week: https://i.imgur.com/nWzlXf9.png (blurred for privacy, sorry) and all that I will see is the red and blue underlines that I have to fix before starting to write (even though it's only a reference that I haven't written).
That was the advice I received many years ago and it has worked extremely well.

An additional mechanic is that you tell them that you are not going to remind them to pay you back, that it is not your job to nag them.
It is worth wondering about that. My first job out of college offered an interest-free loan (paid back by paycheck deductions over 2 years) for moving expenses.
Unconstitutional just means it's not in the constitution. My claim is that nowhere in the constitution does it require the USG to audit a private company for security (especially in conjunction with an after major data breach clause).
>but it's really difficult to bootstrap when you don't have the means.

You have to aim a couple rungs up, not all the way up.

Starting from literally zero you can probably retire modestly but comfortably the owner of a respectable tax dodging container storage and dumpster rental business assuming a little luck and work in your formative years (maybe the local street gang will install the love of hustling for a buck into you) to set you down the right path.

Going from zero to C-suite manager type, not so tractable.
zstd has a long range mode, which lets it find redundancies a gigabyte away. Try --long and --long=31 for very long range mode.

zstd has delta / patch mode, which creates a file that stores the "patch" to create a new file from an old (reference) file. See https://github.com/facebook/zstd/wiki/Zstandard-as-a-patchin...

See the man page: https://github.com/facebook/zstd/blob/dev/programs/zstd.1.md
> Lolz. I don't know Polish, but Google Translate renders these as

Yes, that's kind of the point.

Sort of a Polish in-joke I guess.

For an English language background on the power of "kurwa" and "pierdolic", I recommend these YouTube videos:

Kurwa: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdWlspF3B2M

Pierdolic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTgT-IU--zM
> There's probably a fire escape somewhere that you haven't noticed.

No.
Tomu – A family of devices which fit inside your USB port
Part of the leaked 1.1 states that 1.0a is explicitly no longer "authorized"
Compute keeps getting cheaper. This will absolutely be within the reach of a dedicated user in a very short span of time.

If you can't see the danger in this, perhaps it's more that you're ok with it.
> but I believe this line of thinking is a simplification

Yea, sure. I wasn't meaning to take a hard moralist or anti-system stance, when I say "the company is greedy" I understand the company and its people are a cog in a larger machine.

There is a simpler way out than waiting for a cultural change to stop that practice, though: regulation.

I'm not entirely sure, but I doubt that here in Europe it's so easy for companies to sell payroll data - if at all legal. At any rate it sounds like an abhorrent practice.
By high energy you mean low wavelength, right? Because also large wavelengths could transmit a high amount of energy.
My coffee maker can communicate with my stove and refrigerator over wifi. He seems less lonely now.
I don't think Ulrich Drepper is a good example. He wasn't just rude; he also blocked merging important changes. I think a better example is Linus Torvalds.

> In many cases you're not going to come out with better contributions and code.

I think that you would most of the time.
It’s really irrelevant that a board can give signing permission to Joe Blow - Sr. Wizard III, because the counterparty would never accept such a contract. No bank, for example, is going to write a note to a corporation that unless the person in question is clearly an officer. I only mention this because I’m on my third corporation serving as an officer.

Ignoring the pedantic bits an above, an employee will never completely climb the career ladder without a management role. You can pretend that corporate officers don’t exist, or come up with an arcane loophole that doesn’t reflect reality. It’s not really how corporations are run.
When I saw this idea all I could think of was the ASP.NET "postback" form data and URL data! I'm glad to not have to deal with that anymore.
My $20 coffee maker lasts me years.
I would assume most datasets people are using aren't large enough to justify using a database versus parsing a flat file. You also have to realize this is a field of scientific code, where it matters more that you spend less time coding and more time interpreting results, versus spending time optimizing the pipeline to minimize compute time, and you might be working on a university cluster where your compute is powerful and quite cheap. For people who might work on clinical pipelines that will continue to be reran time again over a vast growing amount of patient data, they probably already put their data into databases. For your academic post doc working on 2000 samples from an experiment for one paper before they find another job doing something else entirely in two years, a flat file is fine.
I'm so tired of everything remotely like this.

Why do we not crowdfund some excellent game designers to make a truly open set of RPGs?

Some that would be amenable to making into Computer RPGs.

Some that maybe that would be nearly impossible to automate. (That's fine, too.)

Under some licenses like CC BY / CC BY-SA / CC BY-NC?

I _like_ buying RPG books. I would continue to do so, even if the license was CC BY. I also like getting searchable PDFs, and turning dungeons into a Wiki for the DM to make it easy to find content.

I mean... Come on...
OGL only covers rules and mechanics, and some of the common, generic races/classes/spells/gear. All of the 'fluff' e.g. places and characters and worldbuilding is not licensed by OGL. OGL allows you to build your places and characters and content so that they're compatible with D&D content.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXId5jOTxdg
It's funny how the engineers are rarely the ones over-engineering.
I’m not aware of any western Buddhism sources that espouse indifference.

Indeed, I usually see indifference being referred to as the enemy. The “near enemy” of equanimity.

Here is one Western leader specifically addressing the point:

https://jackkornfield.com/equanimity-vs-indifference
I wouldn't expect or want an RSS aggregator to respect robots.txt for explicitly added feeds. That is effectively a human action asking for that feed to be monitored so robots.txt doesn't apply.

What would be good is respecting `Cache-Control`, which unfortunately many RSS clients don't, and just pick a schedule and poll on it.
This letter is proof they are not putting up with it. Or do you mean they should just stop playing DnD when WotC pulls this crap?

> You only needed some friends, dice and an imagination

Obviously you need rulebooks, campaign modules, etc. This is the stuff that is under license from WotC.
I have been in plenty of pairing sessions with people using IntelliJ where the speed of thought was not the limiting factor, but the speed of navigating around the project was. There's a few critical shortcuts (particularly pressing shift twice) which in my experience speed up the process of moving around a codebase to make changes or just study what is going on.

Of course, everyone (myself included) develops certain habits and gets comfortable with them, and there is a mental cost with replacing those habits with more efficient ones. I don't have any time for people who are overly smug about their knowledge of different keyboard shortcuts, but I think it's equally unhelpful to discount the value of keyboard shortcuts.
> Are they actually trying to revoke the previous version? I do not know, which is why I ask; honest question.

Apparently they are. There is some uncertainty about their right to do so. The few lawyers opinions I have read tend to say they probably don’t but it’s not entirely clear cut. Someone would have to go to court for it to be ascertained but I doubt anyone wants to fight Hasbro for some old content generating no revenue.
Asking for a loan and not paying it back is the equivalent of lying to your friend.

Is a big lie to exploit a friendship enough to in the friendship?
> Sorta maybe like how Batman beating up people makes some forget that he doesn't shoot / kill enemies.

Kinda reminds me of my top-3 favorite TV shows ever, Person of Interest. The protagonist there had a habit of knee-capping the criminals instead of shooting to kill, which seems like the more humane alternative, but the more I think about it, the less I'm sure.
"If you go to the library could you borrow me a book please?" is really right out and has to be “…borrow a book for me please?”
Before cookies, I remember in middle school (ebay?) using the URLs for sessions.

If they forgot to include the session token on any link on the page, you'd be logged out and have to authenticate again, or you could navigate backwards back to a sessioned address in your history. Once I figured that out, I copy and pasted my session id so if they omitted the session on a link I wouldn't have to log in again.
I'd be super impressed if the requirement was for symmetric gigabit.
Thanks for the link. I'll note that this single burner costs half again what our four burners plus oven costs, though. I guess I'm just not that interested. But thank you.
> visual output with suboptimal aesthetics (TeXmacs, and, to some extent, LyX)

Till now I took the developers word that the aesthetics of TeXmacs is better than the one of TeX and I would be curious to know where the opposite is true (and in case also why this cannot change)
BTW, in case you missed it:

https://corecursive.com/eliza-with-jeff-shrager/

(Does it count as shameless self-promotion if I'm actually promoting someone else's highly relevant podcast that just happened to have me in it?)