skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Similar units in the building are going for the same rates that they were in 2018.

That doesn't contradict what I'm saying. Rent stabilization limits the amount by which landlords can raise rents (2019 also closed a loophole around preferential rents and vacancies). But that doesn't reflect the actual total cost paid by people who are signing leases for rent-stabilized apartments today.

> off-market since 2020

Yes, warehousing is another widely-reported problem in the last two years.
There are a lot of different sorts of programmable signs out there:
https://tidbyt.com/
https://www.vestaboard.com/
Nostalgia is not always negative, and I didn't mean to imply that it needs to be replaced. Everyone knows that the icon stands for "Save" even if they don't know where it came from.

In a recent tweet from Japan, younger people wonder why the "Save" button in Excel is a vending machine with a drink in the tray. Another popular tweet shows a child wondering why their parents 3D printed a save button. In both cases, they understood the icon stood for save without knowing what it was.

As for your question, I would either use a circle with an arrow in it or an open box with an arrow in it. Perhaps a cloud with an arrow if it's saving to the cloud. Another alternative is a bookmark style icon (but then you need to ask: will the future generations experience physical books at all?)

However, I'm not a UI/UX expert, and this might clash with the Download button, so you'd have to ask whether or not the distinction is important in your own application. Keeping the convention of a mysterious floppy disk might still be the right choice.
That's an indescript rectangle that could just show anything and could be from anywhere. They are selling a specific shape of rectangle that shows stuff about London and aesthetically signals that it is from London.
Weird how the US doesn't feel bad about killing a few innocent children and label them as casualties of war.
They are doing that: https://www.tesla.com/blog/opening-north-american-charging-s...
I think the issue with npm is that it makes what should be a relatively important task (adding huge swathes of mostly unknown code) trivial to do, leading to all the bloat and abuse that ecosystem has seen. Sometimes a bit of friction that forces the user to slow down and truly understand what they're doing is a good thing...
Unpredictable churn from layoffs is probably bad, but I view churn in general as an almost necessary thing for software dev. Every great thing I've done on a SWE team has been something the previous person in my position wouldn't do, and every bad thing I've done was redone by someone after me. The truly well-designed and maintainable systems survive multiple owners, so there's a trend towards better. And it's a bad sign for a system to rely on someone.
doitLP,

I help inventors and startups navigate new product development every day. Feel free to email adam@swopedesignsolutions.com and we can get you heading in the right direction. There’s no expectation you’ll work with us, we just love the design engineering process and are happy to help.

- Adam
In terms of wearables, it's quite unobtrusive because it's literally just a ring. There is no display to become distracted with. The inside of the ring will glow when it's taking measurements (red for blood oxygen, green for heart rate) so that might surprise you when the lights are out, but that's about the extent of how "intrusive" it is.

The battery life is very good, I typically get several days to a single charge, which is far better than the Apple Watch. But most importantly it's comfortable to wear during sleep - indeed it takes the majority of its measurements only while you're sleeping. YMMV but there's no way I can wear an Apple Watch to sleep, while the Oura ring works perfectly. I've worn the last two generations of Oura ring and would definitely recommend.
> They don't have the attention span or the culture for it.

Meanwhile $GENERATION is inventing general AI.
Your so-called unpopular opinion is basically "old man yells at younger people", but with even less foundation.
This is the way.

Or if you REALLY want a regex for an input, /[^\s]+@[^\s]+/ seems as sure as you can get without excluding a valid address somewhere. At least one non-whitespace character followed by an @ followed by at least one non-whitespace character. Any more specific than that and it's dicey.

But also just send an email instead if you need to validate the email address.
Yes. He had plenty of opportunity to state problems if they existed. Relaying harm caused would have likely accelerated things, and if harm was being done he would have taken up the still-open offer to solve this problem in the interim while the real solution is pushed out instead of writing misrepresentative and openly salty blog posts for years. Even with him being banned, the Go team is still tracking this issue, still brings it up internally, and has pushed a feature that would fix this ahead by an entire release.

So yes. The issue they banned him from. Because reality's more complicated than flippant one liners.
You mean by making a fraudulent diagnosis that it is needed.
Wow.
> Time with your family is much more enjoyable if you incorporate fun, work, creativity, and fitness, instead of seeing it as taking away from those things.
I hope OP reads this. "Work/life balance" is corporate speak for "my personal shit is none of your business". I don't have much of a life and a lot of what I do is work centered and that is all on purpose on my end. But the relationship between work and personal life is absolutley subtractive and adversarial. You can do what you want on your own time but not on work time.
If I have a work goal I need to get done, I can easily spend all of my time and energy on it which means I can't do whatever I want personally. I know a lot of people that don't put in as much me because they have actual families. There was a work situation where I had to work 12+ on weekends and evenings straight for a few weeks, people I counted on and mentored were bailing out because they had family committments. And that is what balance is. We have 24 hours in a day, you can't have two things as your #1 priority at any given time of the day.
I absolutely never ever want to invole anyone at work with anything in my personal life either and many agree with me on this. I did try to this b.s. before and things did not go well. Don't eat where you shit.
My personal life is for me to do whatever I want. I don't need to work if I can't do what I want with my compensation from work. This is the critical difference between an employee and a servant.
To phrase it differently: work/life balance is intentionally worded that way because it is a restriction on expectations by employeers from employees. My personal is not additive to anything work related because I never agreed to that and I am not being compensated for that.
Codespaces: GitHub's Play for a Remote Development Future (2021)
you sink to exaggerated and derogatory statements when someone makes points you disagree with

what does that say about you?
That's why when I started with design I decided to go for niche products for businesses. Kind of thing that when they have to buy it they will not be looking at the price too much.

Low volume (I was doing all soldering myself!), high sticker price, not especially profitable for me.

But makes it so much easier to design when you don't have to compromise so much and you don't have to be very inventive trying to save on BOM. And it is fun to be able to just do whatever you fancy.

I think starting mass market production for price conscious clients with no experience is just asking for problems.
it implies support, and may place more burden on testing. if you test with XYZ only, but also allow ABC... then ABC stops working... you'll have pissed off customers.
Oh you see A LOT of software from Germany. But we learned our lesson and resell it through US entities for less liability and higher profit margins ;)

(US CTO living in Germany)
I was going to post this! I really enjoyed this episode (and also, all the other episodes of your podcast).
> It doesn't matter that nobody knows anymore, if there's a real need with no alternative, someone can figure it out.

Well, by that logic, someone can build it from scratch.
Industry is too early IMO. There’s a huge need to innovate on rapid recharge.

I’d worry standardizing would negatively impact this.
Why flying stopped being glamorous
My problem with all these is simple: unlike dealing with people's names which, for the most part, they did not choose and have legitimate cultural reasons for the presence of special characters therein, it's not my problem if someone wants to register on my site with an (RFC-compliant!) email like @1st.relay,@2nd.relay:user@final.domain or a quoted email like (following payload is unquoted, quotes you see are part of the email address) "<>"@netmeister.org

I am going to put a (sane and reasonable) maximum length for email addresses on my postgres db column so it's not stored in TOAST; I don't care if you're technically allowed 256 bytes before the @ sign: I'm not wasting space in my database so you can feel special.

I do validate that the domain not only resolves but that it also has a valid MX record because this benefits ~100% of my users and protects them from their typos. It's not my problem if you want to register for my service before you set up your nameservers - its yours.

etc, etc, etc.

It's a fun thought experiment but there's no way in hell I'm going to advise any company to actually allow any of these and open themselves up to a can of worms.

A more sane list of rules would be things like "make sure you support - in the prefix or the domain" and others of its ilk. Also, I came across an email address that was created automatically from Active Directory to Azure with the apostrophe preserved (think "Sean O'Henry" turned into "sean.o'henry@example.com" and it blew my mind when that "just worked" in testing. These would be helpful rules because you'll actually encounter them in the real-world and not supporting them will genuinely inconvenience real people and not someone's PhD research.
me: can you show me your counting process?

chatgpt: Sure! I can show you one way to count the number of words in the provided text:

I would first split the text into a list of words using a space as a delimiter.
Then I would use the len() function to find the length of the list, which would give me the number of elements in the list (i.e., the number of words in the text).

You could use python to accomplish that, here is an example

text = "The Education of Henry Adams is a unique and pioneering work of autobiography that delves deep into the life and thoughts of its author, Henry Adams. The book covers a vast array of topics and themes, including history, politics, science, religion, and the nature of knowledge itself."

words = text.split(" ")
word_count = len(words)

print(word_count)

the output should be 72

I can also use different approach like using python re module which would allow me to count the number of words by matching a regular expression that matches word characters.
The approach would look like this:

import re
text = "The Education of Henry Adams is a unique and pioneering work of autobiography that delves deep into the life and thoughts of its author, Henry Adams. The book covers a vast array of topics and themes, including history, politics, science, religion, and the nature of knowledge itself."

words = re.findall(r'\b\w+\b', text)
word_count = len(words)

print(word_count)

Output would be 72

Is there any specific way you would like me to show the counting process ?

chatgpt output is wrong.
>I don't know what "misinformation" means

Misinformation means false or inaccurate information.

>Your sentence "the community supports" doesn't work here because there is no singular community in this respect

If a comment is downvoted or flagged, it is not supported. If a comment is not downvoted or flagged, it is either supported or neutral (if it hasn’t been seen). If counterarguments to the comment are downvoted or flagged, that’s a solid signal that the original comment is supported (since it was seen) and the response was not supported.

There’s not enough time in the world to explain why every trivially posted comment is wrong. If I constantly posted comments to the effect of “there are no hospitals in Southeast Asia because it’s such a poor region”, how is that valuable? How does that help the community? Why should anyone bother to constantly correct me? And most importantly, if I’m a casual reader, I might take that as truth and that’s how misinformation spreads. I don’t mean “misinformation” in any political sense which is the trendy way to use it, but rather in a clickbait/flamebait sense that makes a populace dumber. Something that sounds plausible and since someone states it so authoritatively on a site that one might think has some credibility, so it must be true. It’s exhausting to constantly have to verify whether something is true because there’s no community punishment for intentionally saying something not true.

>We can't have a rule against being wrong.

You don’t need a rule against being wrong but you don’t need to shut down people that point it out. Nothing here except the original comment was flamebait. I know this because it was the only comment that triggered a cascade of negative comments.

Did you flag drstewart's comment explaining his point? I presume, because there's no vouch link. If so, why? If you didn't, why is that comment worthy of being flagged but not the original comment? Clearly the community has opinions on comments and misinformation is low on the totem pole of concerns. Hence "the community supports misinformation as long as it makes them feel good" -- it feels good to shit on countries you don't like and it feels good to shut down people that tried to go against the flow, all while the original comment that was wrong and incited this unsavory discussion is still standing.
Dishwashers are very efficient, they use less water than handwashing even if you only put a few dishes in.
Working for money is imperative in most people's lives. The failure to do so carries a heavy stick including poverty, homelessness, health issues, the list goes on.

Contrary to the article, balance is impossible first because our economy and low-paying jobs are designed to lock people in them, creating a cycle of living paycheck to paycheck and barely surviving financially.

Work might be an important part of a life where it's not a person's top priority due to finance survival reasons, but would naturally be structured differently. Only in this privileged state is "balance" or "alignment" possible. Even so, I suspect not every healthy person would choose to work, given the opportunity to not.
This happens even if I step away from my own code for a few months.

The last program I built was coded around characters from Sherlock Holmes, by making the code like characters that had to interact in a certain way, it helped me maintain a mental model over a longer time.
It genuinely made the code more enjoyable to work on, as it is a story now
You still haven't told me who owns Nord Stream AG.
Search captions for a given YouTube video
Enter a YouTube URL along with search terms. Search results allow you to cue up the video. Follow on Twitter, @cuesifter.
This is all too common in my experience, "oh we could just use an arduino/pi and a hat and a peripheral" rather than "Design a system that does <x>". As an EE who spent their primary career programming (horrors I know) and in systems analysis, I see it as the logical extreme of "why use a 555 when I can program an ATTiny to be a timer and do other stuff too!"

The allure of having one be able to add features "with just a bit of code" is catnip to product managers. They seriously cannot seem to resist going there.
By now there are as-yet undiscovered tribes in the Amazon rainforest who know that ChatGPT is garbage at maths!
Yeah, that kind of thing happens, like people in retrospect really valuing their time in the military despite getting conscripted and a lot of the experience being on its face awful and full of suffering.

But what I was talking about is more realtime, say you pick up an instrument and keep experimenting with it and what can happen is that it starts to click and feel really good and the possibilities for self-expression or just making nice sounding things really hit you and get you excited to play the following day and so on. A sense of meaningfulness and import then and there. It's the stuff that creates motivation and people are waiting for when they want to start doing something, when they should just start.
A <title> tag on that page would also go a long ways towards making it password manager friendly.
The average software company (or software department in a company) in the US does not move fast and break things.

Examples include large older tech companies like IBM and Cisco, defense contractors, and banks.

Even Google's CEO has been talking about how the company has become unproductive and unable to move fast, because that actually matters now that the outlook for the economy is not great.
You can ask ChatGPT if you can run it locally, and it will happily say it is open source, then give 2 github.com links that 404 and then say it doesn't know where the code is if you press it for answers.
> What keeps the software alive are the programmers who have an accurate mental model (theory) of how it is built and works. That mental model can only be learned by having worked on the project while it grew or by working alongside somebody who did, who can help you absorb the theory. Replace enough of the programmers, and their mental models become disconnected from the reality of the code, and the code dies. That dead code can only be replaced by new code that has been ‘grown’ by the current programmers.

and

> Team stability is vital for software development. Each team needs to be composed of a majority of first-generation developers.

How does this interact with individual or career growth? I don't want to work for the manager who insists I stay on the first few projects I worked on at the company forever...

To take this seriously, internal churn (even if just someone being promoted into management, or specializing on expertise in a small part of the original project, or switching projects when they get bored) is almost as costly as external churn. Five, ten years later how much is their domain knowledge still that relevant to the people working on the code day to day today? It could be harmful if they've been out of the loop and make outdated suggestions, even!

Assuming and desiring your employees will stay in the exact same role indefinitely seems like a huge cause of churn.
My first role had machines like: ob-la-di for the reporting services server, ob-la-da for the nightly build server, etc. I always hated it. In aggregate the services on these servers belonged together. The sysadmin was just extremely casual about his role and thought it was funny and cute. I eventually got sick of going to the wrong server all of the time and mapped them more logically in my hosts file. It's not like he couldn't have done this originally or eventually, but well into the 2010s he was using song titles for server names.
Curious to know how big the cross section of people is that are ready/eager for CL, but don't want to touch Emacs. I think its rather nice this might act as a screen, they are both tied together, even if mostly spiritually now.

In general though, I'd say switch your focus to Scheme, and use Dr.Racket, if you really really don't want to use Emacs.
Seems unlikely, file decompression tends to be quite fast (faster than even relatively fast IO if they're using lz4, but even more expensive compression methods would be faster than an HDD, to say nothing about apparently slow NAND)
"But" nothing. This is a Technology Failure. Whomever worked on this software should face consequences.

Hitting the brakes in the tunnel for no reason is a "never to this" kind of move.

"But [...] other scenarios" is not the situation here. There is no escaped pet anaconda slithering across the tunnel floor. There's no Godzilla breathing fire inside the tunnel. It's just a car with no obstructions in front of it, none visible to any other drivers, and it's choosing to hit the brakes.

There is no excuse.

It's at the bottom of a downhill slope. There's a limited view of what's up ahead because the slope starts to incline inside that tunnel. Cars start to speed up. There is typically a massive amount of traffic on the bridge.

Blame Tesla, full throatedly.
I couldn't agree more. A previous company I worked for used to force push a day or two off every month for 'work-life balance'. I would throw my laptop on and do a bit of something that was annoying me because it's what I really wanted to do and at that particular time I was excited about solving it.

The next day I went into work and was super happy to explain how I solved the issue as it had been annoying the team for too long. I was a senior at the time but my lead called a meeting with me. He continued to berate me for working and telling others I was doing some work.

While I could see his point, some juniors might feel pressure to do the same, but it was how I wanted to enjoy my time. So after this, I really promote a work life balance but give the autonomy to the employee to find theirs.

Now with my team its very clear and unless there is something absolutely mission critical we always facilitate. Our productivity and reliability has gone through the roof, everyone is much more in control of their work.
I don’t think so. This seems new to me. We’ve never had the ability to separate child rearing from a family/community in history.

I feel like we’re decomposing/outsourcing all the life skills that parents used to be responsible for, but we don’t know which ones or pieces are important, so we keep rediscovering skills older generations learned indirectly/intuitively.

We’re starting to realize that the bulk of education isn’t about knowledge. It’s about how to be a person and realizing we don’t know how to reach that explicitly.

We’re in for a rough 50+ years as we figure all this out.
It's not even a "high" it seems like. This is like going under for surgery...
> does reduce the amount of gun-related injuries or deaths though
> a decline in firearm deaths and firearm suicides

That's... to be expected. I don't think someone needs a college degree to figure that out. The majority of gun injuries and death are self-inflicted [0]. Removing access to firearms just means that people will turn to other means. It's also why suicide rates in the US and Canada are comparable despite the huge disrepectancy in gun availability. South Korea has a much bigger suicide rate than the US and Canada despite having strict gun control.

In Canada the Government will grant you the right to commit suicide (yes, you read that right) through the taxpayer funded healthcare system [1].

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_Sta...

[1] https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cj-jp/ad-am/bk-di.html