skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Is this really that unreasonable? From the point of view of a customer who has one of these cards, a recall or RMA is basically the same: they have to mail in their card to get fixed or replaced.

Customers could also return them to the retailers they bought them from.

The hyperventilating about this on tech YouTube is getting a bit ridiculous. The same thing happened with the controversy over the power connector on the 4090. Yes, it's bad -- but it's not like AMD ran over your dog.

When a new product has bugs (and many do), it takes some time to figure out who is impacted and what the fix is -- and when an issue becomes high profile, a lot of people who are not impacted manage to convince themselves that they are. Given that, and the general hyperventilating about this, I am not surprised AMD wants to be careful.
Posting on forums about whether your adult child is tinkering or not is probably past that middle ground, to be honest.
I'm not going to try and change your mind, just sayin' that seems like a really bad idea.
Don't know the why, but the how is probably:

http://paulgraham.com/submarine.html
But relatively minor, expenses don't scale linearly with income.
Huh, that is odd! Which version of the book do you have?
> Should you have to a work a job to breath air?

No, you shouldn't. The space station should have a plan to provide air to all its residents even if some portion of the people can't/won't work. Just like how our society should work even if some portion of the people can't/won't work. You'll never be able to have everyone working. Some people just aren't capable.

Our systems need to be designed with that in mind. And that's exactly what a UBI does. Redistributes a portion of the wealth that all of society creates back to everyone so that those who can't work won't die.
It's not complicated
This all looks great. I’ll save you the Apple agony and run a vm for this.
Well, memory safety is not a boolean, it's a property that's defined by the memory model of the language. That model also defines the impact of a violation.
https://dilbert.com/strip/2006-02-01
I believe all the code on the Secure Enclave is now Swift. I believe they use a special mode/analyzers to ensure only the “ok” stuff is used. Perhaps no memory allocation, for example.

It sounds to me like Apple would like Swift, perhaps with some extra tooling, to be able to handle the Mach kernel. I don’t know if they’ll go that far though.
I would agree if it weren’t super easy to cause a panic in go.

Index slice out of bounds? panic. Close a channel twice? Panic. Incorrect type assertion? Panic. Dereference nil pointer? Panic.

I would argue that all of these examples which are the most common in my experience are “goroutine scoped” because the goroutine was aborted before they potentially modified the application state in an unknown way.

It’s like not in C, or C++ where out of bounds access has now put the entire application into an unknown state.
I used to need to be in a city every other week that was only a 1.5 hour flight.

I decided to see if driving might get me there in comparable time if I compared when I closed my front door to when I opened the door of my destination.

I was surprised to find that the time it took as almost the same. That's because flying requires:

* start drive to airport (45 minutes)
* park and get on a shuttle (15 minutes)
* get to gate (30 minutes)
* wait (60 minutes because I'm early by an hour)
* fly (1:45)
* taxi to gate (5-45 minutes)
* walk to light rail stop (10 minutes)
* ride light rail too stop (45 minutes)
* walk to destination (15 minutes)

Door to door flying: about 6 hours

Driving:

* start driving (6 hours)
* fuel stop (15 minutes)
* park (15 minutes)
* arrive

If I didn't obey speed limits, I could cut an hour or more off that 6 hours.

That said, I still preferred flying. Hard to take a nap or space out while driving for 6 hours.
"English gentleman" is, within the last 400 years, the most world-shaking in-group. And it preferentially hired and promoted within the in-group into the present era.

Dalits and scheduled castes and tribes (forgive me if I'm getting this wrong) make up about 40% of Indians, but are historically about as marginalized as Native Americans and Blacks are in the US. And this marginalization continues with hiring practices in the US.
It's a scam because it promises something in theory that doesn't materialise in reality. Usually to the employees detriment
I wish they'd cut it open or otherwise show the cross section(s) of the interior in detail.
That's the logic of the free market, yes. But do two companies which probably swap employees and executives constitute a market? If I went to a classical market, and two people were selling, is that a healthy market?
But it seems like overall, and especially in lower-wage jobs, employment is still humming along and people are very much not getting laid off.

There will not be a soft landing.

When has there ever been a soft landing and how would raising rates into a recession ever result in one? Raising rates takes 1 year to come through to the real economy - we haven't even seen the impact yet, only on stock prices which foreshadow the real economy and again are a leading indicator. They will raise till unemployment starts to rise.

Unemployment is the goal of this Fed policy - that is the point - cause unemployment so that inflation goes away.
I don’t think they’re calling NAAG disreputable, they’re calling you disreputable since you’ve now openly admitted that you don’t think that the number on your site is accurate but have chosen to pass the buck.
I think the OP is saying defer cancel() is correct, and the stuff people would do to avoid it are the things that are bad.
You forgot the link.
This heat exchanger works by being surrounded by fuel. Thus if shrapnel is entering the vicinity of this part, the vehicle and it's occupants are probably already toast.

Caveat / plot twist: If it's a kerosene or diesel chopper (common with Jet powered helicoptes), the fuel is much less susceptible to igniting due to a spark.

Even still, how often does the outcome land on "If only the heat exchanger was more robust and impenetrable, everything would've turned out significantly better!" ?
Yes. And besides, it is not just us humans. There is incredibly diversity of life on this planet. If alien species have any curioisty at all they must be delighted.
And yet, somehow, Germany produced 46 percent of 2022 German power consumption via renewables.

Could you explain again how this doesn't work in half the world?

Is there no wind in Europe, no ability to lay long power lines (like like gas lines lines, only towards the equator rather than Russia), no path upwards past 46% ?

On the face of it you don't seem to be putting much effort into finding a solution past fossil fuel usage .. is that because you don't accept climate change, you don't care what happens when they get increasingly scarce and more expensive, etc?
Not a matter of comprehension, not of what's written anyway. But comprehension of how what is in there is the hardest case that can be made (among many possibilities), which the other side will have the most difficulty in making a case against. Also, a better lawyer knows which causes are lost and which ones are worth fighting for so that the client has the lowest sentence.

If a bad lawyer sees the case from 10 good ones, he might pick and choose and make ultimately a worse case, or take one of the good ones and just repeat what they said. Which is, in the best case scenario, just as good as having that single lawyer.
Let me slightly rephrase the question: what is the best model that one can run on high-end consumer grade hardware? Let's say RTX 3090.
In organization chart data, there are people with cute names (John, Jane) and there are positions with descriptive names (Head of Product, Head of Sales).

People's responsibilities change but their cute name does not. But you might not know everyone's cute name, and you want to know who to talk to when something was sold that can't be fulfilled. So you look up Head of Sales in the org chart.

Perhaps having two names is what is needed as in organization charts.
The whole point of the article is to discuss Make.
Very fun so far! I have been having trouble deleting any existing val or writing to an exported val from an unexported val.

A specific example is one I made "@demo.newPaste", which seemed to fail to write to "exported @demo.pastes" until I also exported "@demo.newPaste". Is this maybe a mistake by me, a bug, or intended behavior?
Also if that is your concern you'd just wrap the panic on your own anyway.
One interesting concept is that falling inequality will look exactly like this.

Wealthy people have gotten used to increasing the gap and therefore assume that trouble at the top is much worse below.

But what’s actually panning out is that Internet technology is great at replacing white collar jobs and awful at replacing blue collar jobs (I don’t think electricians are losing sleep over ChatGPT).
Occasionally, SQL surprises with bits of composability, such as the fact that using VALUES to specify literal tuples can be used with both INSERT and the FROM clause of a SELECT.

Is there any reason syntactically the SELECT needs to be required? If you use a VALUES table literal as a subselect, you have to give it column names with an AS clause (see https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-values.html). I can imagine a simpler syntax where you'd do WITH VALUES ... AS table_name (column_1_name, ...).

Is there any reason to alias the lookup table as `codes`?

There are apparently lots of other clever uses of the WITH clause, such as https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/queries-with.html#QU...
The gaming market won't evaporate. If the market can't bear the new prices, Nvidia and AMD will just lower the prices.

A real example of price gouging would be a store charging a hundred dollars for bottled water after a hurricane, because people are desperate for it and can't get it elsewhere.

The situation in the gaming market is quite different. Gaming PCs in general, and high-end GPUs in particular, are luxury items, not necessities. There are no longer any meaningful GPU shortages, and there is an enormous secondary market that people can use if they don't want to pay the new prices.

Plus, these cards are the GPU equivalent of supercars -- looking at the Steam hardware survey, the number one GPU is the affordable RTX 1650, which only recently supplanted the 1060. Is Ferrari price-gouging because their cars cost more than Toyotas?
It's a good package in general, save for the panic handling. Panics should not be handled in this way. Remove that wart, and it's solid.
edited, thanks a lot
They have modeled an acceleration via outgassing. It is quite possible and even likely.
It only takes a couple million years for humans to colonize the entire galaxy.

As long as a species like humans is confined to their own rock, there's no threat of them doing much harm. Once they get to a second rock, there's a good chance they'll get to a 3rd, 4th and nth in another star system, within a couple decamillennia. It's exponential grown, limited only by the speed of light.

They'll probably start building Dyson swarms too and taking over stars that way, which is a lot more annoying than them taking over planets.

This is scary fast to observe if you're a long-lived species, or if you live around a gravity well and time dilation makes it seem like humans are buzzing along and taking over stuff at incredible speeds.
> Alternatively, it would be neat to see some effort put behind a "convenient rust" type of compile mode for modules where you could compile with things like implied clones, unified owned vs reference types, auto-arc/box, etc.

If you can come up with a precise transform from "convenient/sloppy rust" to the underlying language, it can already be implemented via proc macros and the #[attributes] syntax. This is how async programming was prototyped in Rust before it became part of the language proper.

Though I'm not sure it's fair to describe Rc, Arc, Cow etc. as "library bloat". It certainly adds some boilerplate, but it's designed to stay manageable.

(Arguably, good coding practice should also informally document why the Rc, etc. is needed and can't be refactored away, i.e. what parts of the program are controlling the lifetime of each Rc'd
object.)
This does not check out. Some of the happiest people I know are also some of the poorest people I know. And some of the unhappiest people I know are also some of the wealthiest people I know.
It is a scam in that the name is intended to mislead. "Unlimited PTO" is not actually unlimited. If it were called "un accrued pto" it would be more accurate.
> "If an Indian is only hiring Indians, but is hiring Indians from all castes, this might be better than a Yalie (graduate of Yale) hiring only other Yalies."

Does that make this behavior okay? Let's run a thought experiment:

If a White man is only hiring White men, but is hiring White men from all ethnic groups (English, French, German, Italian, Polish, etc.), this might be better than a Yalie (graduate of Yale) hiring only other Yalies.
Here's an observation: many men end up throwing themselves at work even more, after they have children.

Why?

Now that I'm a father of a 3 year old, I can honestly say that the first couple years can be rather difficult: You're running hot. You're sleep deprived. Working (i.e. not taking care of kids) can be significantly easier, more rewarding; at least at work, you get accolades, right?
Kraige?
True but at a minimum income I am not employing anyone and basically only paying rent (straight to the megarich) and taxes (straight to the destitute and the megarich) and food while scrounging and DIY for everything else. The portion people spend on working class worker services probably increases exponentially going from lower working class to upper middle class, which would make the effect naturally even worse than a linear one.
With China dropping its zero-covid policy, I think we're realistically on the way out. However there's no avoiding that we need to pay for 2-3 years of lost global productivity.

I mean picture yourself stopping work for 2-3y with zero planning, living on debt and pretending like nothing happened. At some point the bills come due.
I'm a founder (multiple times, with failures) and I would be interested in talking to this person for sure.
Wow, I just watched the first video and it's, hands down, the most crystal clear explanation of neural nets and backpropagation I've ever seen. Bravo.
I wasn't talking about the cost of touching the codebase, but rather running a monolith horizontally with an overhead in terms of CPU-, disk- and RAM-usage.

For big companies it might me a miniscule difference, but for smaller companies it can be a deal-breaker.
If you don't take any vacation, is there a payout at the end of the year? If so, how many weeks? I doubt it is 52.

I've seen a couple companies with unlimited vacation policies only give 3 weeks. That makes things significantly worse than basically every single European country.
It's okay, for software architecture. Really you should just have lots of different types of diagrams until you have enough to understand the system. There's no single type or form that will suffice.
It’s pleasant to use, that’s the main thing about Swift.

A very Apple thing to be honest, so just like most of the Apple products it’s very good in few thing and good enough in others and probably nothing is completely new.

The overall experience is pleasant. Apple is building just as pleasant tooling around it, Swift Playgrounds is amazing for example.
Newbies can learn coding by doing some exercises disguised as games but that’s not what’s amazing, what’s amazing is that you can make full apps with all the libraries and Swift packages and SwiftUI. Apple did good job hiding the boilerplate away, did good job removing the decision making about the project file structure and created an intuitive interface where you can just code without worrying about anything else.

In 2020s, Swift is probably the only language with tooling that lets you just code your ideas and deploy without dealing with anything else. Like creating a Word document and writing your thoughts down straightforward.

I don’t know if submitting from Swift Playgrounds to the AppStore has been released but the beta I was trying last month had this functionality. From idea to market, start to finish integration.
If you asked me whether I've seen more net inefficiency in my life resulting from underengineering with Excel-like workflows vs. overengineering through the "best" software engineering practices at a given time I really don't know if I could say.
I'd rather not share it publicly just yet.
Maybe regional, but most of the mom & pop pizza shop families around me are Albanian. The pizza is great.
Indeed.

<local portion>@<destination portion> is how I seem to remember "email address validation".

The '@' is the only reserved visible character.

The local portion is ONLY to be interpreted by the destination host.

Destination portion does not have to follow any pattern except to specify something (such as a path or resource name) findable by the mail server.

Of course, if you specify a destination only understood by your local email server as a destination in your LAN/WAN/whatever when talking to somebody/something outside that, they won't be able to reach you.

Addresses tend to look a lot more orderly than they used to, but I think this would be a "valid" address (within a given system):

12855977.233~foo+esr@bar!baz.crunchly!test%test#test\\splat\3
I always put a Makefile in all my projects, especially because I change language often and tooling.

I always create a make help task which gives me a list of commands and I have a few conventions, make build, make release, make server (dev server). Most of the time the Makefile is very simple and just call npm, cargo, webpack, ...

Being able to enter my blog written in hugo or a phoenix project or a ruby on rails project and just hit make server has been a real help to me.

That being said, I would not use make alone as a build tool for a complex project, it gets very cryptic when complexity is added. But as a "entry point" it serves me well.
I can imagine JP Morgan will update their due diligence procedure after this. I'm surprised this hasn't happened more in the past, actually.
(Holy cow, just did remedial maths: 550m is a Large Number! Would like to know more details.)
It's absolutely inedible the next day as well. Next day cold pizza for breakfast is the shit, but Little Caesars turns into cardboard and slime.
If its is not it is, it is its. If its is it is, it's it's.
Like any field there is a lot more complexity they didn't cover in the video, but I would expect the designers did, at least in part. Particularly around pressure drops (especially in lube oil and fuel systems) and fouling (again, in a system like oil)
Also I'm surprised they use S&T exchangers on a helicopter. I'd have expected plate or PCHEs, both are much smaller and more efficient. If they're using a S&T there may be a reason for it, but I'm not an aviation engineer.
Dagger co-founder here. This bit is important:

> Since Dagger can natively run Dockerfiles with full compatibility, it’s easy to wrap your existing Dockerfile in a Dagger pipeline, and gradually refactor it over time, without breaking your team’s workflow.

So it’s not either-or. Gradual adoption is almost always better for any tool, unless you’re lucky enough to start completely fresh.

In this case, gradual adoption means wrapping your Dockerfile in a Go “shell”, and breaking it up over time until it’s fully “digested”.
I live in a cheap flyover country city and our "good" croissants are also about 3x Parisian prices... but aren't good.
swift isnt new, but yeah i agree its not as exciting to think about as rust or Go. I think i prefer it over some of the oddities from TS, but certainly over js.
Thanks. I'm hoping to be the same or even bigger (i.e. >= 30")
1. This design would have to be 3D printed because there is not a good way to manufacture it using traditional methods, so it would probably be paired with a 3D printed heat exchanger. 3D printed heat exchangers do not typically have tubes. Rather, they employ more complex geometry such as gyroids. edit: actually I'm not sure this is true. I guess you could come up with a similar design that could be IM'd.

2. Just because you could use the design in "other transportation industries" doesn't mean anyone is actually planning to do it. With the technology as expensive as it is right now, it would not make economic sense.

3. Having a spreader is not primarily about "easing the fluid flow," it's about ensuring that the entire heat exchanger gets fluid flowing through it. Typically this is worth it in applications where weight matters (because you can't afford the dead weight of part of the heat exchanger which is not actually getting much fluid flowing through it), but it is not worth it in industrial or HVAC applications (because it's cheaper to just build a bit larger of a heat exchanger). I do like the idea of a "floating spreader" - I will have to see if that has been done before.
Ah, but it might not as simple as that one single number :

> Driven like a regular car, GM's "voltswagen" is quite adept in traffic. Its 7.7-second 0-60-mph ability equals that of potent performers such as the '69 Camaro SS 350. And since the electric motor produces the same 110 pound-feet of torque at one rpm as at 7000, response is instantaneous.

> With more than a half ton of batteries low in the chassis, the car is very stable and handles remarkably well despite the ultranarrow, low-rolling-resistance tires. Darting from light to light along L.A. 's bustling La Cienega Boulevard, the car would easily spurt ahead from intersections for uninterrupted lane choice.

However :

> Of course, this driving style meant I was sucking amps like the Las Vegas strip, and the battery state-of-charge gauge used everything but sarcasm to get me to slow down. However, I'm a performance driver first, an environmentalist second-so I decided that while my trip up the coast may be brief, it would be without accelerative compromises.

[...]

> Driving smoothly is the key to efficiency (read: more mileage) in any vehicle, but given the current limitations, it's all-important in an electric car. So, to make my way through the 36 urban miles to my home, I was a virtual rolling roadblock, easing into the throttle with such delicacy that within the first few miles I knew I'd be late for my wife's lovingly prepared dinner.

That would explain my confusion after reading this :

https://www.energy.gov/articles/history-electric-car

> With a range of 80 miles and the ability to accelerate from 0 to 50 miles per hour in just seven seconds,

-which I took to mean that they were much better than average-

> the EV1 quickly gained a cult following.
The line is consistently out the door, so they have to be doing something right!
Yes, there are two linked factors. Supervisory declines that allowed the bullies and the bullied to engage without control. This control was teacher/hall monitor overwatch. Bullies were empowered by the loss of supervisory overwatch engendered by fools in power. The overwatchers were beaten back by litigious parents who were the fools.
When I was a kid in the UK in a public school there was a kid mediated, class segregated supervisory milieu that allowed no weapons, no kicking, limited fights as senior boys were empowered to stop fights... It was a mini 'Lord of the flies' scenario with limits. What I see in US schools is rampant persistent bullying with NO RECOURSE. Teachers do not stop it because the kids they may try to stop are as big as they are in many cases and often carry knives or 'chucks.
I hear stories about inner city drug/gun chaos.
Kids with no recourse go home and get their father's guns and seek the only recourse left to them.
I don't feel responsible for what you have chosen to conclude here, so go wild.