skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've watched some Japanese video creators on YouTube and so often when they film streets they frame their shot so as to cut off the faces of those in public (whether by tilting the camera, or shooting a crowd where everyone is walking away). It's so polite, so considerate <3
An ordered list of filters would limit the user to providing one input image and producing one output. Using a schematic editor allows for combining multiple inputs and perhaps even producing multiple outputs from one schematic (the gif on the home page doesn't show this so I don't know if they support this).

Of course you don't need a schematic editor for that, you could also use an expression language with variables. But for people not used to programming that tends to be a bit intimidating.
That's so low overhead compared to everything else needed that it is near-irrelevant
These devices are really fun. I used to have a Snoopy, which I played to death. Tried it recently and it still works absolutely fine.
Good Code Review Etiquette
I turn everything into work...come back to work fully energized

Make fun the point of fun.

But, if you enjoy working, work. It's ok.

Finally, recognize that the idea of "time off" means the time is not your own. Cramming fun into your weekend reflects the idea that someone else dictates when the weekend happens, how long it is, and what happens before and after it.

Good luck.
They would, but they will also want to know how many people read all the way through, how many come back, how many bookmark it or navigate directly, etc. And the advertisers may even want to perform due diligence on their venues.

See daringfireball as a somewhat vocal example of how this can work. NPR has a similar model.

Click farms will not land actual high paying placements no matter how many click they claim.

edit: there could be a startup opportunity here. Build a placement ad network. Participating sites get vetted. Placements are per article, optionally for a limited time or limited geographic region. No tracking. Sites agree to be monitored by human and AI analysis for quality and non-spamminess. Sites warrant that their content is original and the network assists with copyright enforcement. Ads come from the backend (first-party), may be genuinely a part of a content, are are very difficult to ad-block. Ads involve no scripts at all. GDPR compliance is above-and-beyond. Advertisers pay very high rates compared to current systems but get higher value out.

The network helps warn sites if they are inadvertently letting other networks track their users. After all, a high quality site wants to monetize its own users, not let its users be tracked and monetized elsewhere.

In general, ads on a system like this might not even be clickable.
Beside the topic or the content, I love the typography choices of this.
My third point was fun, so that makes your answer unnecessary ;)
This looks great. How long did it took you?
Yep well described
I think the article was talking about tax incentives and social spending when they say deductions
Historically, by which I mean professional typeset documents in early 20th century, it was upright d in both. It's often italic dx in maths now probably just because doing it right is tricky (at least non-zero effort) in LaTeX.

In many articles, there isn't even spacing around differentials. That doesn't mean that is correct too. It just means that, like upright d, the author has more pressing issues than small details of typesetting.

It similar to how vectors (in physics / applied maths) are represented by upright bold letter. Historically, these were bold-italic - the same as how most variables are italic. But early versions of TeX only supported fonts in regular, italic and bold - no bold italic variants existed (even now, bold italics are not universally available for Greek characters). So people used upright bold for vectors, and now it's assumed that it was deliberate.
Step by step guide to becoming a modern back end developer in 2023
Perhaps. But then that means the power lines need to be maintained, even when not in use. I'm not sure what the amount is, but it's probably not insignificant.
Stuff that was very hard just a few years ago is now relatively easier to do. I guess that is the nature of technology.
lol that’s like saying the fine for speeding is $.2
I experience a similar kind of state before I fall asleep, but not every day. I sense the trigger of going into it, but most of the time I suppress it due to tiredness or lack of interest. However, there are certain days during which, I go into the state of super alertness, where I get amazing clarity of thoughts; one would wish to be in it while solving a new coding problem or trying to write super intricate code.
I'm working on a game, but I want to hire an artist who has never even seen another piece of art from another artist so we can come up with a totally original style. Unfortunately, they all seem to have been trained on stupid museums and art books. Can you help me find my truly original artist? I pay a nice hiring bounty.
The point of antitrust is to encourage that. That's competition. We want Facebook to build net new things.

Facebook's not all that good at building new things, though. Most big companies aren't. Partially because they don't need to be.
My inbox is my todo list. When I find something interesting I email it to myself. Within 24h I will inevitably see that link I sent myself and it will be easy to skim through or just trash it.
>The comparison was due to the licence.

Thanks Sherlock.
Global plague nope, supply chain disruption nope, a land war in Europe nope.

Printing 13 trillion dollars for corona stimulus, yep.

Though I guess that's more the fault of the legislature than anyone else.
That was the point of contention upthread. Someone said doing backends for online games was a good transition for a general programmer, which intuitively seems plausible. The concern was whether that was too niche but the size of that market implies otherwise to me, however much bigger the whole pie might be.
it does case matching (#hashTag === #hashtag === #HashTag) too
There is a good introduction in Chapter 12 of The Jolly Writer: https://www.scypress.com/book_info.html
Precisely. It's not like they're about to lose ground to Amazon Prime, Vimeo or Dailymotion, either - YouTube is Google's iPhone, a product so iconic and ingrained in our daily lives that they can blight it with ads and scammers, but people will still use it. There's no limit to the power they can exert over their own platform, and as we've seen it traditionally leads to situations like [this].

All of this is to say: if you fear regulation or government regulation, none of these problems will ever be addressed.
Mocking dependencies in ASP.NET Core tests
Just got offered office space in San Francisco (SOMA) for the same price as 2009
Nowadays maybe a touch-typing learner could just go straight to Dvorak (or other arrangement) rather than QWERTY.
Maybe because you were hydrating together with your booze? Dehydration is a big part of the next day headache.

In my 20s when I knew I had a long night of drinking ahead, I would get a glass of water together with each serving of alcohol. Seemed to work pretty well.

Once dehydration is taken care of, the remaining effects or hangover can be cured with protein-rich food. IIRC vitamin B6 depletes after heavy alcohol intake, and is one of the factor of hangover.

But avoiding alcohol binges often is the better option. The Ballmer's peak of giddiness, sociability and mood elevation tends to be well below what one would call a "binge", and has carries next-day effects.
It's a missed opportunity to awkwardly add a ThinkPad TrackPoint 'mouse nub'. My disappointment is immeasurable.
Yes, if there's anything I've learned from the crypto markets lately it's that a few years of (apparent but vigorously unaudited) success is proof that it is very safe and won't come apart precipitously.
That doesn’t make the nightmare of expense reporting go away. You just do it of the corporate card, it tracks better but is still a total pain.
The Expanding Snake Heart (2011)
It’s true- Arthur Bryant is bad BBQ.
I think this is probably true in the short term, but in the long term I think the ability of AI to create art will outpace the need for more new assets. Right now there's definitely cleanup that needs to be done on AI-generated stuff, but the need for that will diminish quickly. I'd be shocked if by the end of the decade we still had artists cleaning up AI work.

Games may need 1000x the assets they do now, but if AI is 10000x faster at creating them than humans are, then you're still going to see a big reduction in the number of humans needed. Eventually we'll get to the point where the game's AI is procedurally generating assets during gameplay (and eventually you'll get AI just generating the games).
YouTube is a tremendous antitrust fail. The very definition of price dumping.

It could have been profitable earlier, but it would have been much smaller and faced stiff competition. That isn't what Google needed from it.
Had a couple years break from Java and then back to it in current job. You know what - Java is fine and I am enjoying the work. You can knacker things up in any language and modern Java has a lot of the rough edges worked out (tooling, dependency management, runtime monitoring, frameworks).
Works now. I do very little writing that requires math, although I did have occasion to present Muller’s Recurrence for a discussion on floating point arithmetic. The tip "Expressions Should Be Punctuated Like Sentences" is a good one, and generalizes somewhat to inline code or any inline figure or table in writing.
I’ve built it for now in a separate branch called “self”:

git clone -b self https://github.com/Sentido-Labs/cedro.git
cd cedro
make bin/cedro # Just “make” will build cedrocc etc.
bin/cedro - <<' EOF' # Mind the indentation.
#pragma Cedro 1.0 self
list->init();
list.init();
list->append(123);
list.append(123);
EOF

The “self” flag after “#pragma Cedro 1.0” activates the “self” macro, because it should not be done by default.

Result:

list->init(list);
list.init(&list);
list->append(list, 123);
list.append(&list, 123);

I’ll try it out for a few days and if it works well in practice I’ll document it and merge it into master.
Must all criticism of Tether be FUD? Their past behavior alone makes me skeptical that it'll ever be trustworthy no matter how rich the gold mine they may have fallen into.
Booting has fundamental hardware limits, though. Will that harddrive or whatever really reply all in 0.2 ns?
Is any of this open source?
No they aren’t they said “implementing k8s”
I have a pet theory that this relates to how on social media picture sharing apps, in general, low effort selfies tend to get more engagement than beautiful landscape photography.

People like looking at other people, and people especially like looking at themselves
No, not really. It specifically addresses a useful purpose -- education -- meaning that no, it's not just for fun.
This is the most vapid attempt at context marketing I have seen in a long time.

Could have been a very interesting topic if looked at in detail.
Well you can try by yourself:

«Decrypt the following text. It uses the caesar cypher, "P ohcl kpzjvclylk h aybsf thyclsvbz wyvvm vm aopz, dopjo aopz thynpu pz avv uhyyvd av jvuahpu."»

And you'll get this answer:

«To decrypt the text, you need to determine the shift value used in the Caesar cipher. The Caesar cipher is a simple substitution cipher where each letter in the original message is shifted a certain number of places down the alphabet. For example, if the shift value is 2, then A would be replaced by C, B would be replaced by D, and so on.

To decrypt the message, you can try shifting the letters in the ciphertext back by different amounts until you find the shift value that produces meaningful text. Once you have determined the shift value, you can use this to decrypt the rest of the message.

Here is one possible solution:

Shift value: 7

Ciphertext: P ohcl kpzjvclylk h aybsf thyclsvbz wyvvm vm aopz, dopjo aopz thynpu pz avv uhyyvd av jvuahpu.

Plaintext: I love solving puzzles and challenges, they are so much fun.»

That is completely wrong. It should be:

«I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this margin is too narrow to contain».
The way I see it, this only proves my point. As you write: '...None of them have become the standard...' and this is at the center of the argument. TeX may not be ideal but it strikes the correct balance to become and stay standard for so many years. One can do pretty much anything in bare Postscript (and I am ashamed to admit, I have) or even 'handmade' PDF but it does not make it a good alternative to TeX. I have experimented with alternative syntaxes (apologies it this is not the correct plural of 'syntax') but had to give all of them up due to a number of flaws. These experiments gave me a new appreciation for Knuth's choices.
Why not use one of the on chain solutions? Theres quite a few options platfoens ib defi.

https://www.coingecko.com/en/categories/decentralized-option...
Your 150k should buy you x% shares and your idea and execution to date should be worth x% more. The remaining equity should be earned by everyone’s future efforts. You both need to be full time and exclusively committed. You agree x% each and this follows traditional vesting schedules. I’d expect those % to be higher than if you were also paying salaries. The rest of the equity should be in some sort of pool for future distribution. If one or more of you aren’t fully committed IMO that creates the most problems later. I’ve been on both sides - founder and vesting employee and my contribution here is not following anything other than what I’ve learned through my experiences.
Not long ago in the UK: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14462046/school-teacher-prophe....

Separately but on the same theme, there was an outrage against sex education in schools, because Muslims were offended, saying it was against their way of life. The irony was that the protest was lead by a dude who didn't even have children.
And you can still get stiffed if you loose the receipt
Banner ads? Maybe.

But take a brand like Nike as an example. I can imagine Nike paying to put (one!) swoosh on an article on a site like ESPN. But Nike, if they’re doing their job right, would not want a swoosh to interrupt the reader’s experience — that’s the opposite of good branding.

Consider FM radio as another example. Ads on most music stations are obnoxious. Sponsorships on NPR are generally much more subdued, take less time, and don’t try to stand out.

(Oddly, NPR is quite obnoxious about their own fundraising placements. I wonder whether they would be more effective if they backed off a bit.)
In those times of economic chaos, a working class individual could afford a house and food for his family.
That's not really a problem. It sounds like a problem, but enforcement has to start somewhere. The FTC is targeting a broad range of markets: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases

Some of the purpose of antitrust enforcement is to establish a baseline to "warn" other companies. They've only really interfered with a handful of tech acquisitions in the last year, but it sure sounds like everyone doing M&A is being very careful right now.

Sometimes a credible threat of enforcement is enough.
In response to your questions, ChatGPT says, "Intelligence is the ability to process information, think abstractly, and learn from experiences. In the context of artificial intelligence (AI), intelligence typically refers to the ability of a machine or system to perform tasks that typically require human-like thinking, such as learning, problem solving, and decision making. There is no one specific definition of intelligence that is universally accepted, and different researchers and practitioners may have slightly different interpretations of what intelligence means in the context of AI."

Seems a bit circular.

"What's a good definition of intelligence?"
"Human intelligence."
"What's human intelligence?"
"What we want AI intelligence to be like."
Nope, not what I meant at all with that!

No one enforces the laws i’m referring to widely, and your average American rolls their eyes at it. Law enforcement doesn’t try to enforce them either normally. Though they do occasionally get used to harass someone they don’t like.

So society doesn’t care, and it just gives more ammo to harass the occasional person they don’t like for other reasons.

When society cares, then the law is followed more (and enforced more), and it matters for the putative reason the law was created.

For instance, murder? People will murder someone sometimes, obviously, regardless of the law. When that happens, investigations happen, and people go to jail (when it all lines up, anyway). But also, laws against murder do stop people from murdering folks they otherwise would! Because they know it will be taken seriously.

Interestingly, this effect can be seen from things like Serial killers and the victims they choose, who are often people society doesn’t seem to take murders of seriously, including runaways, prostitutes, women of color or natives, etc.

A law against murder is stopping more harm than it
causes, by a pretty large margin, near as I can tell. Putting more effort and focus into ensuring it’s investigated more thoroughly seems like it would pay clear dividends in many ways.

That is not clear for plastic bag bans. Near as I can tell, plastic bag bans are causing more harm - environmentally, even.
Question 37 as the branch point to Voight-Kampff.
If not showing repeat vacuums does not improve clicks, I'd be very curious if it reduces clicks either.

It seems like what you posit is only a mystery if we take it on faith that targeting works. Once that faith is lost, you can also approach it from the angle that if showing them something we think they want is just as effective as something we know they don't want, you're actually proving that "what we think they want" isn't working either.

I mean, given "we know you've bought a vacuum cleaner" and "we think you'd like a kettle" - if ads for either are equally effective, either there's a lot more people collecting vacuums than either of us would have expected - or we're entirely wrong about the kettle. And it seems to me that our blind faith in targeted advertising leads us to wonder why people want so many vacuums.
You're crapping on a thing that Knuth and friends made and gave you for free.

Are you about to go write something better?
Someone showed a picture in an educational context with no intent of harming but to educate and lost their job because of it.
People seem to be losing all sense of being reasonable in their response to things they or someone else find "offensive".

The fake outrage is really disgusting back to the dark ages.
The person you originally replied to and I disagree that we have any real, practical definition. I can recognize what humans and to an extent animals do as intelligent, but haven’t seen a definition that separates that intelligent behavior from them. I have never seen anything that’s been called ai do something I could call intelligent in that animal-like sense (though some have been impressive in the same way Google / page rank was impressive when it first came out)

So, I don’t see why rubbing these statistical model sticks should suddenly burst into intelligence, but I’m open to seeing convincing reasoning on that at some point. I wouldn’t invest time or energy in the meantime and like that original poster, think it’s kinda insane to if my goal was to see human-like intelligence emerge outside of humans
I've been enjoying home improvement stuff so much! Replaced an electrical panel recently; replaced rotting wood and added a new window in my shed; added drywall in the space going into the basement. I have very little experience with all this - just learning primarily by watching YouTube and reading some things on the web (and a High School physics course helps understand forces at play / vector directions).

I've heard that many webdev people enjoy woodworking / etc. It is a lovely fit for some.
The Cortex M23 and Cortex M33 chips seem to be the lowest power I can find.

That's Microchip's SAM L10/L11, STM32U5, and the Nordic Semiconductor chip I mentioned earlier. Probably a few more out there (ARM sells their core to many different companies after all).
Please do not trivialise genital mutilation as 'culture war'.

Did you actually read the french (and german green) petitions?

https://web.archive.org/web/20050404190912/http://www.decadi...

Here is the letter from the well-known intellectuals:

https://www.dolto.fr/fd-code-penal-crp.html

They were not just about making the age of consent equal for gay and hetero sex. They were also pushing for lowering and abolishing the age of consent altogether. You can see this as a 'submarine'. From the wikipedia article:

"Michel Foucault argued that it is intolerable
to assume that a child is incapable of giving
meaningful consent to sexual relations."

There is clearly a structural similarity between contemporary apologists for genital mutilation under euphemisms such as 'gender affirming surgery' and the what the french intellectuals demanded 50 years ago.
ChatGPT can already generate almost working code. The obvious next step is to close the loop by replacing the human in RLHF with a compiler and unit tests. I think for coding tasks this would fix most of the hallucination issues.
That’s got to be like a tiny fraction of SAP
The FBI has a mandate to monitor and control political groups that are deemed liable to carry out act of political violence. In their efforts inflitrate these organizations they discovered that even if their agents are exposed, the fact that the organization was infiltrated fomented so much suspicion and distrust that the groups would frequently break-up anyhow.

Trust is the glue that keeps society together. Generative AI demolishes it.
November – Last Month in Minetest
Cons

- lower job security (frequent layoffs, canceled games, missed financial expectations)

- lower pay

- less work-life balance

- higher risk projects

Pros

- great technical challenges

- you'll work with non-engineers more often

- a more social, less grumpy environment

Work ethic and reputation is key to succeed, as you'll need referrals from coworkers to keep things going over time.

Larger studios are known to be meat grinders. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGar7KC6Wiw

Working in the games industry is a valuable experience but not everyone can afford the salary hit.
Hallucigenic drugs are probably not good for math performance.
TeXmacs has its own macro language. The equivalent of \newcommand is \assign together with \macro (yes, TeXmacs has proper first class macros, like any respectable language, e.g. Lisp). And macros arguments can be edited visually, here's an example: https://twitter.com/gnu_texmacs/status/1251554336842407938
> People really overestimate the data volume put out by a service like Twitter while simultaneously underestimating the bandwidth capability of a single server.

It's outright comical. Above we have people thinking somehow amount of TLS connections single server can handle is a problem, in service where there would be hundreds of thousands lines of code to generate the content served over it, all while using numbers from what seems like 10+ years old server hardware
I always think about how electricians, plumbers, janitors, other such roles don't do this bullshit. Why is it that businesspeople can force software engineers to engage in their pointless warring corporate factions? Something's gotta give.
In my mathematics is \d x .