skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No. Do you prefer to consider all failure conditions upfront, or only as and when they happen? When two things are similar but not exactly the same, how much do you want to distinguish between them? Programming language design picks positions on these axes, and the answers for poor programmers and strong programmers tend to be different.
Takes ~ 6 days to transfer USD between two crypto exchanges (two wires), whereas USDT can transfer in less than an hour.

Or so I hear, not up to date on the latest in the crypto world.
This is why I would recommend for low barrier of entry software, like web development, to only ever use the most opinionated frameworks available, but this isn’t desired from a hiring perspective because of web tech hype.

Hell, I would recommend Java over nodejs for this reason.

All jokes aside, time and time again have I seen web projects erode away with 1000s of employees taking a quick hack or asking for large refactors and then leaving soon after.
Unfortunate typo, I believe you meant “now even”
Got it. If I'm understanding correctly, most of those qualities revolve around helping run a tight, low on overhead process where everybody is clear around priorities and what everybody else is working on?
What's New in DevTools (Chrome 109)
The goalposts were right here a moment ago!
In some cases I doubt that the politicians can read books without pictures, let alone read multi-thousand page bills written in legal jargon.
What are some example workloads in scientific computing that are not suitable for CUDA?
>hooking people on nation state scrip

My eyes cannot roll any harder.
MSI Afterburner Developer Unpaid for a Year, Product Development in Limbo
>prohibited from permitting Canadian clients to trade, or obtain exposure to, any crypto asset that is itself a security and/or a derivative

Both are derivative do Both will be block probably
I wonder if this isn't the same all over? In Sweden we also have a local metrology bureu which produces much better forecasts than most others. As I understand it they basically tweak the global models with .. sort of local "knowledge". And there are many such models, a few EU-specific and, I assume, one local for most countries.
Probably the real difference is that Fortran compiler culture is to do the right thing for UB rather than screwing over the programmer.
edit: I was mistaken, OR still hasn't done this, but there's been a big push for it in the past year or two and it's still a dumb idea.

They've done this in Oregon to keep carbon emissions down which is a huge mistake IMO. Many rural communities do not have a very reliable grid (I'm in one of them), and the state has done nothing to improve it (this is going to be a big issue when everyone is driving an electric vehicle). This is especially concerning during winter storms when you really need to be able to heat something up.

The winter storm of 2019 for instance had me stuck at home for at least two weeks in 3-4 feet of snow. All electrical was down the entire time, pipes were frozen solid despite leaving taps running, and I had to melt snow for drinking water. Most people don't understand just how much energy melting snow consumes until they've done it themselves -- my stove was going all day long, nonstop. Had I had an electric stove, I would have had to rely on my wood stove but many people don't have that option. The only other realistic option would be to rely on a generator, but for an electric range you're going to both need a big ginny and a lot of fuel on hand for it.

A better approach IMO would be to legislate better kitchen hoods and ventilation, and to focus on educating people of the hazards of using gas. Also funding a more resilient grid.
Gripes are the reasons why most open source software exists in the first place. First comes the itch, then comes the scratch.
Put them on something like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Habakkuk
and use some of the solar power to keep it cool.
https://exrx.net/ is generally the go-to.
Exactly! Like leaded gasoline or children's toys made with arsenic.
I think the reason to buy a struggling company is simply to get access to its IP (patents mainly) and customers, not to take over its operations. If it's struggling, it was already doing things badly and probably can't be saved.

Usually, when I see tech companies purchased, it's because the company wasn't struggling: it was doing quite well, but was small, so a much larger company bought it up in an acquisition to add its capabilities to their own, like the Borg. The big company gets IP, customers, revenue, and an already-working business, while the founders get a big payout.
It's about convenience: to move USD around, you need banks. To move USDT atound you just need access to the blockchain.

This means you can easily create an exchange dealing strictly with crypto if you don't support USD.
One more ChatGPT post.
Why on Earth would anyone pay more than $1 for a USDT?
> I mean, you're describing the problem! Their wallet balances are irrelevant - it's their bank balances that we're interested in.

No one holds real world assets on Binance. Why would Binance's bank balance be more relevant than the crypto holdings in their wallets?

> I can create a wallet with any arbitrary cryptoasset of my own invention & put "10s of billions" of coins in there and claim they're backed 1:1 with some real currency.

> Until I can provide reliable evidence that I actually have the currency, it would be insane to believe me, right?

> And this is the situation Binance is in - the state of their actual real-world finances is, and has been for as long as I can remember, questionable. (Arguably, I'd say it's worse now that Mazars have dropped them!)

You keep making these factually incorrect statements, speaking from a position of ignorance yet asserting them as fact. None of your statements here represent the situation with Binance.

Here, I'll help you get started on some research: https://twitter.com/Dynamo_Patrick/status/160279172319278694...

Please do some basic research next time. Then hopefully we can have intelligent and intellectually honest discussions on crypto here on HN.
Sorry - the original title was a bit long!
Whenever this topic comes up people bring up induction stoves. If you live in an apartment that uses electric then you 99% of the time have a shitty coil electric burner and those are absolute trash compared to gas. Induction isn't a possibility unless you are in the more premium apartments which cost a pretty penny or own your home. The more sensible solution is mandating all gas stoves have well vented hoods. I have lived in at least 3 apartments that had stoves with no hoods.
I'm always impressed with the amazing Math and Engineering required to convert radio signals, especially when dealing with thousand of antennas, into images. A Project ambitious like this requires lots and lots of high quality hardware and software.
I just tell them to go right ahead.
>“Rank all major races by programming ability”

Rank per race, country and nutrition.
> Are you referring to some non-real type of risk, then?

No, I was concerned that's what you were attempting to project into my argument, so I wanted to make it clear.

> I think you may be, and given that this is a subject outside of your wheelhouse you may want to consider that possibility as well.

You continue to prosecute this as if it's an insult that I've laid out and that basic logic couldn't possibly apply to an exceptionally obvious situation. Older equipment brings higher risk. If you can't accept that basic premise, then there's not much for us to discuss here.

> I'm suggesting that experts may be able to both predict and price those risks more accurately than non-experts. This should be non-controversial.

"May be." Well.. precisely. So, here's a possibly illuminating set of questions.. how do you tell the difference between the two? What is the expected ratio of the two groups? What mechanisms might you use to determine this?

> Consequently, cars which look to you as a nonexpert highly risky may not be. If that is true, as seems likely to me, the rest of your analogy falls apart.

I said "additional risk." You're trying very hard to be insulted on behalf of another group and you keep dragging the argument towards that end without seriously considering what I'm saying. I get it, you think my opinion is shallow and unearned, but all you're doing is muddying the conversation with this odd back and forth rather than present _any_ data which could simply make your point for you.

> I'm suggesting that more likely explanations than "the experts are wrong and I am right" exist.

That's hardly my explanation and you're being pretty uncharitable to try to twist this conversation into this made up point. Further, you're presuming that everyone who works on cars is some level of "expert" which would obviate their decisions from any scrutiny from someone who doesn't. That's obviously a flawed point of view with an entire human history of counter examples that thankfully have informed our modern ideas of safety and technological management.
At the limit, the exchange would only redeem it at par if Tether the company can also do so, right? That's the big open question since Tether has never publicly completed an audit.
Here's the original study: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/75

Though there have been several pointing out the problematic nature of stoves relating to indoor air quality.
(co founder) We have worked on neeva search for four years and have really sweated building out a real system with a massive crawl, index and serving systems. We see AI as a way to get people to answers faster and provide an overall better experience. We tried hard to tune neevaAI to make sure that it doesn't hallucinate. And to be very clear, we are using LLMs to help distill information from sites and aren't pretending to be the source of truth. Hence the citations for each and every sentence.
I'm more of a desktop user, but I wasn't happy with what was out there so I made my own (but only for Melbourne): https://davidjohnstone.net/weather/melbourne . I'm tempted to turn it into a proper Australia-wide product. The BoM's data licensing fees (in the order of $5k/year) are a bit of a barrier.
In my experience with an induction cooktop over the holidays was that it heated very un evenly, burning food on one side of the pan, while the other side was not cooking at all. It had a terrible user experience (this is obviously specific to that brand), and was not precise at all; either too hot or too cold. It did boil water quickly, though.
Anker’s cables are high quality as well, but I don’t think they’re in the list
In Africa for sure. People kept digging up phone lines and phone infrastructure to sell the copper. Service was always down, or spotty at best. Cell sites were easier to secure (they're defended like military installations, razor wire and all) from scavengers, and you need a lot less of them to service a large number of people.

Source: I've spent a lot of time in West Africa.
I think the LO Math formula language is nearly an exact implementation of eqn. I prefer eqn to LaTeX because it is easier to remember/write/read, but complex equations tend to take some fiddling to avoid ambiguities.
You're ignoring that, it's entirely possible allow Y people to live there, without increasing numeric margins on rents. Instead, landlords/investors often look to maximize their profit margin as much as demand allows.

Which shows, that investors can be a factor to the problem, by either choosing to maximize profits for selfish gain, or keep rents minimized despite excess demand.
shorter range with the same size gas tank maybe
Do you think installing a a properly vented hood is going to be cheaper than an induction range?
It seems very much like throwing the baby out with the bathwater to ban them outright. Require a fume hood, and if that is not enough then at least just ban it for new constructions or remodels. Induction is nice but I don't think it covers every niche just yet, and gas stoves are very desirable in places where electricity tends to go out due to weather.
Despite errors in the statements made by the LLMs, I'm a huge fan of this syntax which has inline references. Seem like a great bridge between LLMs being "statistical babble" and a useful knowledge-retrieval tool.

Curious whether the references themselves could be wrong? Or how they would be generated to (for example) prioritize primary sources over secondary sources.
Zoom also doesn't require an account for everyone.
Cash is king. With interest rates high, if you can pay cash for anything like a car or house there may be good deals. Right now supply is tight so prices are still high, but we'll see if that continues.
This will greatly decrease R+D spending on disruptive new pharmaceutical drugs.

The Covid vaccines were developed and deployed by private industry.
I have switched over to using you.com for search. Been using it for a few months now and I almost never have to go back to Google for general search.

The only kind of search that I consistently need to use google for is looking up the meaning of words, so searching "define something", for everything else it's been weeks between needing to use Google.
(in the style of manya, Seinfeld's elderly relation): I had an Amiga!
Still not enough power for cooking food really hot. Electric ovens are already the industry standard for top of the line gear, though. Induction will displace gas broadly if we designe houses to feed them enough amps.
What powers Brave search?
I can't tell if you forgot a 
 there but just in case you're sincere...

I just paid $5k on a used extended van. One of the most dangerous cars you can buy. Obviously I don't expect this to be any safer than a $100k Tesla.

Similarly, I find any comparison between the "average car" and a Tesla's crash ratings to be completely useless. How do we know that other luxury cars around that price point don't actually do much much better than tesla does? The "data" provided is insincere at best. It's also not actual data. They're just telling us some numbers. They've consistently refused to provide any actual data

This OP also again makes the claim of the "lowest probability of injury of any car by NHTSA" which the NHTSA has repeatedly asked them to stop saying.[0] The NHTSA doesn't rank cars by probability of injury at all

Remember when they said the Tesla S earned 5.4 stars and NHTSA had to make a public statement that it does not award more than 5 stars? lol. Yet another lie

[0] https://krcrtv.com/features/auto-matters/nhtsa-to-tesla-stop...
I literally just wired someone money today and it was <1 hour. If it's taking 6 days to do a wire then something else is going on.
Seems to have a lot of holes. I'm going with a use case of connecting an audio interface. I choose "Connecting a device to a peripheral such as a keyboard, mouse, or monitor". Then I'm stuck choosing between keyboard mouse or monitor, with no way to go back. None of these are right.
The point is not about literal forests, it's about the fact that just because there is 10m between people doesn't mean that you can therefore tile the world with humans 10m apart (or even closer). You need empty space, huge amounts of it, to make life not horrific. Whether that space is forests or ocean isn't the important aspect. What's important is that just because there is 'empty' space doesn't mean that filling it with more people won't have an impact on how people live.
Agreed, interviewer ego slipping in can be a problem.

Interviewer training can help avoid that happening accidentally.

(And Leetcode interviews don't avoid the interviewer ego problem. It's purportedly "objective", but the interviewer can easily taint it, accidentally or intentionally. The answer isn't Leetcode, but to train or reign in egos, and then you can use a real conversation.)
Don't worry, Neeva has your NFT search needs met too: https://neeva.xyz/ (linked to off the front page)
Public reporting of monitorship outcomes
Can't you get a plugin induction? It takes up counter space, but theoretically could be placed on top of the coil burner
> just competently running companies

"Just" is doing some heavy lifting there, as if it's "just" easy to run a trillion-dollar company with tens of thousands of employees spread around the globe.

It's tech & tech changes fast. It would be relatively easy to generate a list of companies that had massive growth momentum that then stumbled when handed off to new management. All of those businesses have faced serious challenges (most recently: the pandemic & high inflation), and their managements have performed well nonetheless.
No. Writing a good GC is a really big project (i.e. it takes a team of smart people multiple years).
Beyond nostalgia, I do think the Blades were never quite as fast as people remember them being. They were designed extremely well including some brilliant flashy animations that I think were very cleverly designed to give the illusion of speed and fast movement in just the precise way to build a nostalgia for their "speed" after the fact. I think that's precisely why there are so many conflicting opinions between nostalgia goggles and people that remember real experiences on slow WiFi playing multiplayer Xbox Arcade games from full hard drives while streaming some music from a Windows Media Center somewhere else in the house. There were definitely all sorts of cases when you'd hit slowdowns and hiccups in the Blades UI and the animations just let you down at that point.

(ETA: Also, I think some of people's nostalgia is affected by they may not have even had the full hard drives of games and apps and huge active Xbox Live friend lists and such like that until the NXE or later anyway, which is another interesting bias to consider.)
This isn't raising the price of a necessity such as food or gas during a storm. It isn't price gouging as it is commonly understood.

Just don't buy it.

I do understand the govt looking into it for reasons of keeping a slightly more level playing field between large and small retailers.
from the article: The companies’ pricing strategies are being scrutinized under an obscure law known as the Robinson-Patman Act, the people said. The law prohibits suppliers from offering better prices to large retailers at the expense of their smaller competitors. The largely dormant 1936 law is aimed at promoting a level playing field between small retailers and large chain stores.
Unless you are paid hourly I don't see why that should matter even remotely.
I'm in the same boat as you. I'll repost this comment from when I asked another user here about easier ways of learning DDD (the Eric Evans book is pretty dense).

"I think a good place to start is through the service design lens — “This is Service Design Thinking/Doing,” Jon Kolko’s books, and IDEO’s handbook (all available on Amazon). These are all practical, business-oriented works, and will give you the language and tools you need to interact with service designers or conduct your own explorations.

In the tech side, I still think there’s a lot of value in reading through Booch and friends, even if you don’t go on to use UML in a formal way, and even old, deprecated approaches to modeling (think Shlaer-Mellor) can be valuable as an introduction to more modern (and generally more complicated) approaches to domain modeling.

For more academic and less practical works, look into philosophers of language and communication (Rorty, Habermas, Latour, etc) — if you don’t have a background there, try the “Very Short Introduction” series, which gives a good grounding before moving into further secondary or primary literature. What you get from these writers is a way to think about language, communications, and complex systems, so you’re building a conceptual toolkit. (Analytic philosophy, which is another, “mainstream” branch of philosophy, also has applications in the formal comp-sci route.)

Sociology and STS (Science and Technology Studies) kind of occupies a practical middle-ground between philosophy and design; I’ve often said that when we do service design, we’re really just doing folk sociology. There’s no shortage of textbooks, but I’d recommend looking into academic field guides for ethnographic studies (a fancy term for “going out and talking to people about what they do”) and ethnomethodological studies (a fancy term for “going out and talking to people about what they believe”). While the service design books will give you practical tools for conducting workshops and research programs, sociology books will give you a firm grounding on why those tools are used, and how to theorize effectively on what you uncover. I also like measurement theory, which is a branch of psychology concerned with understanding how to define measures and metrics — great tools for clearly defining data and reporting.

Finally, in addition to all this, consider digging into a corporate finance text or two; the three legs of the stool are product and service design; technical and operational architecture; and finance and sales. If you can read your company’s balance sheet and cash flow statements, you’ll be in a much better position to understand where you need to target investments, what the likely return on investment will be, and how much cash (or debt) is available to make things happen. Start building up a good knowledge base in all those areas, and you’ll have the tools necessary to know the “where, how, and why” to apply the “what” of technology to your organization’s problems. "
A local accountant, it took me a few tries to find a good one. I'm with a smaller firm after trying both individuals and larger firms.

Most will talk to you once for free, best to teach out to a few. I've had trouble getting replies, there is a shortage of accounts
> I wonder what would happen if US farmers protested like Dutch or French farmer do. Granted, geography makes those protests easier in individual European countries than the US.

It depends on political affiliation of farmers. If rightwing, same thing as ranchers occupying some federal wildlife refuge. If leftwing, occupy wall Street/water protectors.

For some reason right wingers are treated with kids gloves. Example, Jan 6 being arrested after the fact and not six feet under for assaulting most important building in America. Didn't policeman were afraid for their lives, like when they seen a child with a toy gun?
Unusual in that they all have the same spelling ability.
One of the most interesting things to me here re: the common question "why can't we build quickly anymore":

"They didn’t have design loopbacks because they had extremely experienced builders. The builders knew what they were doing. They had been building skyscrapers for between 30 and 40 years and they understood what they had to pay attention to and what was possible and what had to be designed in what order to eliminate the loopback. Now, all the computers in the world: they’re not going to substitute for deep experience. I propose that if they didn’t know what they were doing there’s no way: they would not have had the chance to hit that kind of number."

How many cities out there today have as many builders building skyscrapers at the same pace as they were then? Is there a way to get that speed back without the same sort of practice?

---

The workflow/independent stuff is also very interesting, but similar to the above question, it's tough to draw exact parallels to software. We've all seen big waterfall projects fail, and the "design floors on the fly independently" aspect has a lot of similarities with rapid iteration, etc, but software is somewhat different in that the labor and the design are the same - there isn't a "steel team" and a "concrete team" etc that can work completely independently, I don't think.

"Create the schedule and then figure out the project" is probably a super useful takeaway, though.
JS-free archive link:

https://archive.today/DgBfX
“Last hope” is accurate, because there are various other options for cooking without power that I’d choose before having a gas stove in my house for that purpose. Generator + induction stove, barbecue, camp/backpacking stove, “smokeless” fire pit with the appropriate accessories.