skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I would love to find out that there's a species on this planet whose reproductive strategy depended on tornadoes.

Not exactly the same thing:

Birds, insects hitch a ride in hurricanes

https://wildlife.org/birds-insects-hitch-a-ride-in-hurricane...

Hurricanes May Bring Unusual Pests

https://specialtycropindustry.com/hurricanes-may-bring-unusu...

I have read that it is believed that flies and other insects found on remote islands originate with one or a few being blown in on a hurricane.
I absolutely adore the touch interface on the hanging lip of the phone!

Spectator mode was also an incredible idea.

Kudos to HoloKit's design team!
Luckily the CSA has no power.
and were your concerns serious?
Esri’s Calcite Component library is another.

https://github.com/Esri/calcite-components
Don't get involved in sharing more about this.
If Tether is insolvent then better to ban it earlier than later, before it becomes even “too bigger” to fail.
The fact that a couple of other companies have had dumb leadership in no way proves that AMD's is dumb. You're essentially claiming that because Lehman and Boeing had dumb leadership, all senior leadership at all companies is dumb (because there's nothing linking AMD to these other companies except that they're all companies). And that is an absurd claim.
I hear your frustration. I can relate. But this:

> I was damned near suicidal from fighting for acknowledgement

I sincerely hope this was hyperbole. Please don’t ever allow anything work related to affect you to this extent. You are more than your job. There are other opportunities. There is much more to life than software.
Everyone is on the spectrum. Coders are just closer to one side of it :)
Here in Japan, drugs (including MJ) are not legalized at all, and drug laws are in fact extremely strict, as some American tourists have found out the hard way even when they had tiny amounts of MJ accidentally left in their luggage.

Yet virtually no one dies from drug overdoses here, and drug-related crime really doesn't exist in any significant amount.

Of course, the society has other similar problems, namely alcohol and cigarettes. Smoking is really on the decline though, since it's mostly been banned or restricted indoors recently, and alcohol consumption among young people is down too for various reasons (cost is probably a big one). But drinking to excess (and then passing out in the street even) is still a big problem.
But isn't that part of why the standard is so terrible? Isn't the only way to get maximum power delivery over a Thunderbolt cable? You can probably charge a laptop over a standard cheap USB-C cable..but you might not depending on how many watts your laptop wants.
Vent hoods with a gas stove are a mixed bag. Especially if you have a downdraft cooktop. The air movement sucks a tremendous amount of heat away from the burners, it makes a noticeable difference on how much heat makes it into the pan.
For another SW game being reverse engineered see TheForceEngine.GitHub.io

The project is reversing the Jedi Engine from "Dark Forces" and "Outlaws". The fan doing it is clearly talented and a former game dev.
How the 'Kimchi premium' on crypto affects overseas remittances
Yes: someone in that situation is far more likely to be the victim of gun violence (the attacker can pick the time and place, everyone has to sleep, etc.). Having that violent ex unable to get a gun because the review process determined they were a high risk would save many lives in the U.S. every year.
Laravel is doing just as much to keep it alive.
$70 at IKEA[0]. I use mine for hotpot mostly.

0. https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/tillreda-portable-induction-coo...
The quiz is simple and to the point, with no cruft, so the overall experience is pretty good.

But I have a (slightly tangential) UX/design question: if now you are compelled to remove the Next button from the question pages, how would you achieve it, without reduction of functionality?

For example, on the first question, which is a single-choice question, if you make it submit on-click, then the user would lose the ability to change their mind before submitting, which is reduction of functionality. So maybe you'd consider doing a swipe-to-submit (punishing mouse users).

Then you have multiple-choice questions. Has anyone seen something clever that is both intuitive and removes the need for extra travel to the next button?
We trade with bees, and that's very close.

I remember a video of that some biologist/museum that was using some insect (cockroaches?) to clean the meat around bones, but it didn't feel like trading.

At a closer level, we trade with dogs, and cats trade with us, so perhaps there is a hope.
Because a static reference causes objects referenced by it to never be GC'd. As a simple hack, someone might add a singleton implemented as a static field of a class. That reference could be/have a structure/collection that accumulates and never gets freed.

You can find these things using the Java Memory Analyzer and the OQL it supports. Sometimes easy sometimes tricky.
ADBC 1.0: Database Access for Apache Arrow
That sounds wildly unhealthy, but if you have found something that works for you, congrats.
A fifth of passwords used by federal agency cracked in security audit
> People kept digging up phone lines and phone infrastructure to sell the copper.

This became a bigger problem in South Africa with its reliable load shedding schedules.
The Winklevi have the Fed stamp of approval.

CBDCs coming soon to a government-approved centralized exchange near you!
With game consoles being more “media centers” than just game consoles in 2023 I’m not sure I agree.

At the same time I don’t think there’s anything preventing you from ignoring 90% of a console and just launching disc-based games. You’ll need an internet connection for patches but beyond that it’s pretty easy past initial setup.
You are on a thread discussing crypto.coms decision to delist tether as result of CSA's ruling...
Neeva gave me this result:

> If you are in a car accident, the first thing to do is to determine if anyone is injured and call 911 if necessary.1 Then, go to the nearest police station and file a report as soon as possible.2 After that, exchange information with the other driver, take pictures of the scene, and contact your insurance company

Which isn’t really coherent — it says you should go to the police station, THEN take pictures of the scene (which you’ve already left). Definitely has some work to do.
That is a an interesting insight on BSing and I appreciate you being so upfront about it. Your response is why I like HN so much - you gave me an angle I didn't have to ruminate on.
Looking through history i am forced to draw the opposite conclusion. Life was pretty uniformly horrific except for a very few people at a time that happened to draw some density around themselves. Nobility with servants lived ok, everyone else had a very bad go of it.
You'll likely still need someone with sufficient JS skills. The key will be for the designers to think in such terms (i.e., components).

In nearly every (marketing) agency I've worked at, the designers envisioned themselves as creatives. "Boundaries? Not us. We live outside the box..." Trying to get them to understand you can have the same underlying structure and just bend it with CSS wasn't something they've wanted to imagine. The idea of reusing (read: not creating from scratch) isn't in their DNA.

Again, this isn't all web designers. But marketing agencies do a lot of non-enterprise design and dev.
As long as things like embedded coprocessors (IME, TXT, PSP, etc) are kept out of view.
Unburned natural gas is not just a little stinky, it is profoundly nasty. Way, way, way before you could get enough concentration to hurt you, or blow something up, you'd be vacating the premises. Mercaptan is really strong stuff.

Like someone else mentioned, you probably had a malfunctioning furnace. Your symptoms match CO poisoning, and carbon monoxide sensors don't usually detect natural gas leaks -- it's a different molecule entirely.
> When folks have problems with HTTP I ask them if they’ve read RFC 2616

Well, that sounds like an utter waste of time. I just wanted to know if this endpoint responded to a GET or to a POST request.
What is missing? Is this confined to the software environment, or also covering like data accessibility and workflow documentation?

Asking as a scientist interested in reproducible research. Julia has been so much better than python at least in terms of dependency hell, but I still rely on some python packages through PyCall and I feel like that isn’t handled as nicely as Pkg.jl…
Apple’s next custom hardware trick might be its own microLED screens
That’s not a gas leak.

That’s a faulty furnace that needs fixing ASAP, you should notify your landlord right away.

Carbon monoxide is caused by poor combustion.
My search clearly returned a skinned version of the google search. I smell vapor.

Edit: that was hasty. I compared the search and saw different hits. But the format was 99.9% identical, and didn't include any AI synthesis (or anything else to recommend it over a typical search). This was with a logged in (free) account.
Has anyone triggered the "AI summary w/ citations" behavior?
Why a 17-Mile Stretch of Arizona Highway Is a Booming Logistics Hub
> If you’re poking and prodding, you’re doing 1:1s wrong. You should talk to your manager or HR about how to run effective 1:1s. If these resources aren’t available, you need to reach out to others managers at the company or in the community.

You're misrepresenting what I said, and are being disingenuous. See my comment here → https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34332925 - I was not advocating for poking or prodding.

> Lastly, this doesn’t imply that it’s a sign of desperation, but reach out to your reports. Ask them if they think the meetings are effective, and raise your concerns. They’re an equal partner in this meeting, and should be for their benefit just as much, if not more than your benefit.

Thanks for the incredibly obvious advice.

> Honestly, given your comment, “But for the love of god, don't schedule a recurring meeting just so they can tell you things that are easily gleaned by reading a git commit.” tells me that you don’t actually understand what an effective 1:1, nor team meeting is. If you’re stuck a dramatic reading of the status reports, you failed to set the expectations of the meeting, and should learn how to run effective meeting. There are literal books written about this.

I'm being absolutely serious. I do not believe effective meetings exist. At least not how meetings are typically defined in the modern workplace. They are solely for the purpose of creating the illusion of work. I've read many literal books on the topic, and believe them all to be mostly trash.
(co founder): have you tried google mobile? I just did by setting my user agent to be an iphone and got the same pile of ads on google.

And trying the same query on Neeva gives you a step by step direction right on top including the information to call 911.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j64PkSm0EEoam5l2yByWv3P6...
That would work great in the summer if the community has space and exposure. Winter in a mountain valley, not so much.
Given its either worth what you paid for it and there is a non-zero risk its work zero, there is absolutely no reason you should ever own it for more time that its absolutely required.
Maybe I'm missing a euphemism here, but what's the incentive to tell them about your "concrete company" even if you feel comfortable doing so?
I kinda specialize at getting into legacy code bases, understand how they work, and quickly be able to make changes and clean things up.

But I don't think I've read any books on that. What I do is read the code!

I think can do this mostly because I'm interested in it. SW projects die because the code isn't maintained properly and becomes unworkable. So I work on being the counterforce to that, keeping the project alive.

Most engineers are into writing new shiny code, and hate "cleaning up other's mistakes". That's also often rewarded. The results are well known :)
1:1 are for building relationships and talking about long-term goals, in work or otherwise. It's also a good time to discuss big picture goals, seeing where the work you're doing fits into the grand scheme of things (at least within the company)

This goes both ways: if you're the direct report, it's best to build rapport with the manager so you can work more smoothly and especially to get that raise or promotion later on.

I guess sometimes its hard to build the relationship for some people, but often it does take time.
It's easy; help people who are trying to use or understand your software, or show (in detail) how your software helps solve problem X which was actually being discussed organically. Having a helpful friend who works for the company is a lot more useful than having an annoying salesbot interrupting your conversations.
Single family homes in America are 240v rails for large appliances, like stoves/ovens, furnaces, and dryers (two-phase).

Technology Connections (YouTube) explains this fairly well:

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMmUoZh3Hq4
Stencil and consequently Ionic are all Web Component based.

Svelte fully supports compiling to Web Components with 100% test coverage.

Vue fully supports Web Components as well, the only issue I've run into there is with CustomEvent.detail not being copied into the Vue event payload properly.

Web Components are widely used on the web, just under the covers sometimes.
> we're 240v and you guys are 120v right?

No. The US is 240V single phase, with an option for split phase 120V on smaller circuits. Cooktops, ranges, and ovens are 240V (technically they're usually both 120V and 240V, but the high draw parts are 240V).
My reaction is "How can anyone quote a second hand account from a clickbait article about a purely one sided account of a relationship recountered via a reddit thread" ?

With a side serving of "Why is this even on HN at all"?
You also need to engage with the community independently of the product you're selling. You can't be there just as a sales guy, no matter how tactful, if you're going to "live in" the community.
No, it did not.

Humans are pattern-matchers, indeed, pattern-overmatchers, so it's not unreasonable that you felt that way, but this does not reflect anything like a "thought" from the AI model.
IMO they are complimentary to react.

Frameworks like react/angular/backbone/vue solve the problem of creating a single page application with a nice architecture and sharing code between components within the SPA.

Web components solve the problem of sharing code between any application.

There are opportunities to share code (eg/ data binding) and I believe that is the case (they use the same underlying browser APIs where available)
> It appears as a repulsive gravitational force, and we’ve named it dark energy.

That's actually not true. Space is actually expanding, meaning new space is coming into existence and no one really knows what that looks like at a quantum level. Then again, we don't know how gravity works at a quantum level either.

The quoted figure is 72km/s/MPsc (+/-5). That means if two objects are 1 megaparsec apart (3.26 million light years) then space itself is expanding between them at the rate of ~72km/s.

Dark energy is really the fudge for all this. The idea is that creating new space takes energy. That has to come from somewhere and dark energy is our fudge factor for that. No one really knows what dark energy is or looks like just like we don't know what creating new space looks like. It just solves a conservation problem.

This isn't gravitational repulsion. It's why the universe is ~13.8 billion years old but we can see the light of objects that we now estimate to be >40 billion light years away. Space itself has expanded. It's not gravitational repulsion.

> In our most advanced quantum theories, we can calculate the energy contained in the vacuum, and it’s infinite. As in, suffusing every cubic centimeter of space and time is an infinite amount of energy, the combined efforts of all those countless but effervescent particles.

That's not true either. The calculation of vacuum energy by QFT isn't infinite. It's just really, really large. This is one of the largest errors between theory and observation in all of physics because the measured energy of a vacuum is ~120 orders of magnitude less. This is a well-known (and open) problem known as the vacuum catastrophe [1].

Lastly, on empty space, it's well-known that atmos are mostly empty space (as the article notes). I mean this is why neutron stars can be so dense. But it's worse than that. The nucleus itself (already a tiny portion of an atom's volume) is mostly empty space. Nucleons are made up three quarks and those quarks are tiny compared to the nucleon's size.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant_problem
The sooner the better

The biggest leaps in the crypto sector come from external action. Collectively, everyone knows how to do better more resilient stable value. Collectively, everyone knows the limitations of custodial arrangements.

They just won't act, en masse, until they have to.

If the government stayed out of crypto we would all be using single signature accounts with Silk Road having a monopoly and crashing every few hours on super slow Onion routes, just like it was 2012.
This would be a great question to ask your manager in your next 1-on-1.
I’ve been reusing the same rsa4096 for about five years after an abortive attempt to use a ed25519 key.
Bernie Madoff?
Alternatively, it speaks to a lack of focus and lack of will to stick with a product and polish it unless it produces massive returns immediately
Can you link me to this “ruling?”
Shit. I was hoping for recipes that were generated via AI.
Click to submit for single choice questions and keep next button for multi choice. Perhaps add checkboxes / radios so it's more clear which one is which.
I guess the local grocery store better look out.

If he paid any taxes, can those be clawed back from the IRS too?
You did not _really_ "wire money to someone in <1h".

Your bank signaled its willingness to move money to an other bank, who is in turn trusting enough of your bank to preemptively display that money as "received" while the actual settlement will happen the next day.

Modern, traditional, banking and brokerage is not based on actual fund transfer, but on the layering of trust relationships and complicated settlement state machines to give the impression of instantaneous transfers.

All operations done on money "just received" is done on margin, though at 0 cost.
It's not clear why you are compelled to do this, or what benefit for either party would be achieved by doing it.

What do you hope will happen by telling your "day job" about your "concrete company"?
Surgery

sometimes people cover for a bad surgeon for financial/political reasons, but there's no fooling the anesthesiologist
You should avoid flaky tests. They slow down presubmits and make it hard to do bisections.
While the idea behind it is nice, the number of possible outcomes isn't high enough to justify the complex decision tree the user has to go through. Here's a much easier way to represent it:

Amazon Basics standard USB-C – slow charging phones, connecting simple peripherals

Amazon Basics 100W USB-C with PD – fast charging phones, laptops, connecting monitors

Apple or Belkin Thunderbolt – connecting ultra hi res/high refresh rate monitors, high speed data transfer
What would the "right thing" be in this case, in cases where the compiler cannot detect at compile-time? Will it actually check all variables in scope for aliasing when entering the function?
No euphemism intended. The only incentive is for clarity of communications if I am scaling down availability at "day job". You bring up the good point of "why mention anything at all".
> >Coinbase is a weird company, because it's got such an obvious comparable: CME Group. CME Group has about 3500 employees, [...] Firstly, I don't see how Coinbase needs as many people as CME.

> Coinbase isn't a direct comparable to CME because CME only does the exchange function.

> Coinbase combines several different types of financial institutions in the crypto space:

> + exchange : order matching engine of buy & sell -- analogous to NYSE/NASDAQ/CME

> + broker : custodian of customers' margin accounts -- like Schwab, Vanguard, Fidelity, etc

> + bank : digital wallet and loans with customers' crypto as collateral -- like JP Morgan, Bank of America

> + ecommerce payments : analogous to PayPal/VISA/MC

> Even though CME deals with trading corn commodities, it is not a bank for people to use corn as collateral. Therefore a corn farmer can't go to the CME and get a loan and pay it back when he sells his crop harvest.

> Regardless of all the various financial areas they're in, Coinbase got overstaffed (like many other tech companies overhired) and so they're making aggressive cuts.

So maybe Coinbase should only keep profitable parts and cut/restructure/sell parts that aren't, instead of burning all their revenue in hope of capturing the market?
The exploit actually performs a login, so you need a private key for that. It's a way for a hacker to track what machines (still) accept the key they've obtained.

Key-based authentication for SSH is often referred to as "pubkey authentication" (because you share your public key with the server) so that's probably where the title comes from. I don't think it exploits the same problem.
> "professional scientific fortran programmer"

That is too late You CAN'T start with a developer that, hopefully, do good code. You MUST make good code to be the default, from the start. Is the only chance of lasting improvements.

ie: Is necessary a "Rust/Ada for Fortran", and this ALSO must make, somehow, make some significant impact in current Fortran developers, make them salivate for the chance of do the change.

But iterate on Fortran(C/C++..) and hope that will be better? NEVER will work.
> CI

That'd be pretty cool, actually! A little... maybe ironic? How many stories are there about "they didn't stop to ask if they should, only if they could", and then... outsourcing that check to an AI system. Like I love it, but also, sus.

> bugs

Yep! I think positronic brains would notionally use a heuristics system ("human detector says 89%"), and AFAIK so do our AI systems. That said, your larger point still stands: what happens when such a system either fails, or is mis-calibrated, or is calibrated in a sus way?

(such as facial recognition, at first, not working on BIPOC faces... because the devs used themselves as the test subjects and weren't BIPOC)

I'm almost certain there's at least one story by Asimov on this issue; I know I've read other SciFi on this issue, although I think it's much more common to have the AIs act "better than the humans" rather than vice versa. Something like: "The rules you programmed in say Group X are humans even tho you don't treat them that way". Usually (I think?) when it's "Group X aren't humans by the programmed rules" it's apocalyptical because no-one / almost no-one fits.

I think you could probably write a cute short story about robots anthropomorphizing a lot of things in order to catch all the odd human edge-cases ("not all humans have a face").
Learning LISP the hard way:

One of my teachers: "Oh, you've never done any programming? Cool. Your first assignment is creating a game of 圍棋 in LISP. Go."

Awesome, thanks.
(co founder) It is early days in this technology! In some cases (think news), you want the freshest news while in other cases (breaking story), you want the first article that broke the news. Def things that we are working on.
agree! we will work on making this better!