skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Just trying to get started on Cloudflare Pages using Hugo.

https://kunwar.me
This made me laugh but also made me think about what does and does not evolve. Sharks and the coelacanth fish are often mentioned as modern animals that “have never needed to evolve”. Guess it’s just based by comparing current physiology/structure to what fossil records can be found.
Of course “everything evolves” but that depends on a frame or reference in time
"Little" being ironically applied. Serfdom, short lifespan, and no Antibiotics research alongside massive amounts of routine child abuse and women as a subclass. Great!
Of course it works. Over eating causing fat gain has been known about for hundreds or thousands of years. The idea that it doesn't has always been an excuse and probably came from mischaracterizing science into psychological issues around obesity and food addiction.

What doesn't work very well is "curing" fat people by just telling them to eat less. Yes it would work if they could just eat less, but it does not address their actual problem which is the compulsion to over eat. Might as well try to cure alcoholics by telling them not to drink. So I understand why over eaters get upset about it, it's not like they don't know they eat too much and they don't want to be so fat. Though advancing the conspiracy theory that food intake has little to no bearing on weight is not a helpful response to that either.
Great article to show to people saying "put your backup passphrase / second hardware key into the safe deposit box"

Keeping physical stuff safe is hard. Banks were specifically invented so that people didn't need to keep valuables on them.
I would be more surprised if acquisitions were fully integrated into the company. Normalizing the culture and salaries across different companies seems like a great way to piss off everyone in the acquired company, and if they leave then you've lost a significant amount of value.
The one review from Singapore on the 3rd party listing says that it comes with a stepdown transformer.

I guess I'll just order direct, get it forwarded, and do the same! :) Thanks!
Folks are absolutely going to look at this from an inappropriate angle here (cuz... duh... we're nerds).

The side of the fence you're on is directly proportional to how old you are. Neckbeards who want you to get off their lawns love XML (related: get off my lawn). And the "kids" will give a bajillion reasons why we are "technically" incorrect...

If you split hairs here... You've never lived in a world without XML (truly terrifying TBH).
> There is zero science behind this.

I was curious about this so I did a little searching. I found some studies showing that resistance training has lower injury rates than contact sports, and youth resistance training in particular is safer than pretty much any other athletic activity. But I didn't find any studies that covered bodyweight strength training, so I couldn't evaluate GP's claims. Regardless, given the low injury rate for resistance training, I think it's fair to recommend people lift weights, and I mostly agree with your last sentence.
But looks like this, as of now anyway, only applies to new world species and thus sites in the South American continent and not Africa or Asia.
> The experience of being a Google employee is not normal. It’s not reality.

”Working for Apple is like being paid to go to Disneyland.”

— Guy Kawasaki, discussing how difficult it was, to hire ex-Apple employees.
It's not about whether I care about Budweiser, who was trying to buy is irrelevant and like I said I don't even like their beer either. I'm just against the idea that registering a domain is something that entitles you to try to use it to make 15 million on transferring it because you were first and hoped someone with big pockets could buy it from you. It's one thing when your reason for not selling is your legitimate intent/action to actually use the domain but it's another when you blatantly say your reasoning is they have more money they could give you for it. It's not some crazy idea, modern policy at ICANN (who actually owns the domain anyways) agrees this is not how they want domains to be used either and most people in that position nowadays at least feign an attempt to say their reason for not selling was existing personal use even if internally they know it's about trying to get more money for the transfer as they know they'd be at risk of having their registration revoked otherwise.

Public resources like domains are tricky. We want them to be used not treated as a get-rich-quick opportunity where people who registered a bunch of generic things try to get millions for sitting on domains. I'm glad in the end this one actually got used but when the story from the source itself gives a completely different reason it's hard to be excited about it regardless how much you care about Budweiser in particular.

In comparison for example (though not specifically domains) "Dwarf Fortress" didn't sell rights to the name because they were actually using it, intended to continue using it, and didn't want to dilute the value they had actually put into the name that made others want to buy it. In the end they made millions of dollars with success of the game's newer launch off that brand identity they had built. That's an inspiring story of not selling a name.
if you make under $50k-$70k a year do you not pay very little?
Indian Kanoon – The Genesis and the Legal Thirst
I think the issue has less to do with sincerity (in the sense you’re referring to) and more to do with the reasons for it. The troubling aspect of “nicespeak”, as we’ve defined it, is that it serves to reinforce a corporate power structure. _That_ is why I mind it while appreciating garden-variety civility.
> Some people do not own phones, or do not wish to provide you with their telephone number when asked. Do not require a user to provide a phone number unless it is essential, and whenever possible try to provide a fallback to accommodate these users.

This is really hypocritical coming from Google.
I know 3 types of names that from the outside look the same but mean different things within the strength circles.

* Weightlifting (Clean & Jerk, Snatch)

* Powerlifting (Squat, Bench, Deadlift, Maybe Bentover Row)

* Bodybuilding (High volume isolation exercises)
The PATCO strike[1] was '81, and Reagan's admin was RIFE with greed. The trends we see today didn't just spring up with the fall of the Berlin wall in '89; it has deep roots as a reaction[2] to the 70's and 80's.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_Air_Traffic_Contr...

[2]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tppeGYoWDxg
The answer is still no, we don't know how to make long lasting concrete with modern techniques either apparently. Hence the research.

Especially steel-reinforced concrete, the lifespan is only 50-100 years. The only exceptions are massive structures like dams that will probably last a couple millennia.
SEC Inquiry into Former Senator’s Stock Sales Is Closed Without Charges
Most brutalist buildings are already 60+ ish years old and doing great (actual brutalism, rather than “concrete buildings I don’t like,” was mostly a style of the 1950s and 60s in the west, though it lasted quite a bit longer in Eastern Europe). Even the Boston government services center, everyone’s most hated brutalist building in the US is already past 50.
Any exercise is better than no exercise. But in my experience, bodyweight training will not put you anywhere near the ballpark of size/strength that a good weight training program can.

I say this because I see a lot of impressive looking dudes selling calisthenics programs, but I heavily suspect that the lift weights and/or do steroids in addition to bodyweight programs.

I exclusively did bodyweight training during the pandemic and it kept me healthy and my physique definitely improved for the better. Once the gyms opened and I went back to weight training, my size/strength absolutely blew up from what it was before with no changes in diet/sleep/time spent training. I gained about 18 lbs of muscle in a pretty short amount of time and I suspect I can gain a good deal more once I dial in my diet and sleep.
The specific reference is to the essay "The Analytical Language of John Wilkins", in which Borges likens an taxonomy proposed by Wilkins to a (almost certainly fictitious) Chinese encyclopedia which groups animals into fourteen categories:

> (a) those that belong to the Emperor, (b) embalmed ones, (c) those that are trained, (d) suckling pigs, (e) mermaids, (f) fabulous ones, (g) stray dogs, (h) those that are included in the present classification, (i) those that tremble as if they are mad, (j) innumerable ones, (k) those drawn with a very fine camelhair brush, (l) others, (m) those that have just broken a flower vase, (n) those that look like flies from a long way off.
I think I'd agree with the OP, the eccentric is more precarious. Weakness on the pull and the bar slows/stops but there is still control, weakness on a slow lowering and the weight runs away from you breaking your form. When you are at 4+ plates then your strength on the day can be a little unpredictable and your 5 rep max can be lower than it was last week and you don't want to discover that in a precarious position.

It's like comparing driving up a steep hill vs. coasting down a hill with just the brake, a slight bump or misjudgement and things get hairy quick because gravity is compounding your mistakes.
I looked at the article for numbers, and the closest I could find was that a trirarch paid many multiples of a laborer's yearly salary. That could mean the benefactor was shouldering a large burden, or that the benefactors were stupendously wealthy compared to the average laborer and the financial obligation was not heavy for them. I don't know what the case was.

I could find no estimates of total tax burden, which at this point would be mostly conjecture but better than nothing.

Compared to a modern-day country like Belgium or France, where the tax burden is about 44-46% of GDP, I would wager that the Athenian tax burden was very low as a fraction of the economy. To achieve modern levels of taxation you need a bureaucracy which did not exist in classical Athens.
Base salary can be re-invested (granted, their hands are somewhat tied when it comes to personal fund management due to the nature of their job)
No?

Just plugging this in - with $70k income, you pay $8,142 in federal tax/withholding, a 14% effective tax rate.
The fast change on the powerblocks (and a few other adjustable dumbbells) is such a big selling point. Huge win over the loadable ones I have.
>They had a whole team dedicated to building a shitty front end component library that we all had to use to reskin our apps in order to achieve design consistency.

I feel awful for the engineers who end up working on these efforts, it's heartbreaking and ultimately a wasted endeavour. Your small team can't keep up, people start working around you (even actively undermining you) and eventually that company edict forcing everyone to adopt said library is forgotten in the name of expediency. I've seen it so many times now to the point where it's become a farce.
You seem to be referencing electricity. That is missing the energy which comes from oil. The energy from oil is the important stuff here, because it is the one that links into the US dollar and its performance.

And the US having access cheap oil is a good argument for why there might be a sudden step change in their economy - there are a lot of people with a serious interest in breaking the US dollar oil trade. Now including Russia and possibly China if they can read the writing on the wall. The US can't fight them both at once so China is in a pretty good position to get away with stuff right now if their regime survives COVID.
Epochalypse
I do miss the slashdot style meta moderation in a lot of places … I like the idea of running stuff past a screening group of users to temper the ability to wildly push around the moderation system by newly created accounts or low engagement users or bots. It seemed to work pretty well. But no such system is perfect so I’m sure there were flaws I just never noticed.
That's a great description of them, a small convection oven. I already bought an air fryer before I realized/discovered that, and it's a wonderful thing. I know convection ovens exist, but I don't know if anyone I know has one, so air fryers (as tiny convection ovens) are a new capability. And a pretty awesome one too!
This explains why I'm able to achieve my lowest ever score (0.7%) by starting a sort of spiral shape near the dot, whereas drawing that spiral in reverse would be much closer to perfect (>85%).
I'd say if it's for general data exchange, I'd shy away from attributes as much as possible. Not all tools handle them well, and XML novices can get confused about their usage.

Using plain tags is so obvious that just about anyone can get it, and in my experience there's no real advantage to using attributes.

At least that's my experience at work, where we use XML as our primary integration format for others that want to deliver data to our system. When going through with a new customer, the few attributes we have almost always cause some kind of issue or misunderstanding.
But the question realistically is, is it the developers responsibility because they are the ones creating the program.

It's not like copilot made you use the code, copilot didn't commit or release the app with the code.

Copilot didn't breach the copyright, you did. It's a tool. You used it. You released it.

Maybe there's a product which you can include to see what code of yours violates copyright in the future?
The sentence was so generic it felt superfluous. It made me think of "Welcome to zombocom. You can do anything at zombocom."
The system did not rely on honor alone to work. If a rich citizen was tapped to provide his services, he could either perform them or choose another, richer, citizen to fund the city. That citizen could either accept the honor, or swap wealth with the original citizen and pass back the honor.
<cough>

Neckbeards who want you to get off their lawns hate XML and will wax lyrical about how S-expressions endow data with type semantics, whereas XML just gives tree structure to pieces of text.
this doesn’t factor in the $12k deduction and saving in a tax shielded 401k or IRA though which should both dramatically reduce adjusted income come tax time

plus tax advantages you get when you are married and have dependents
(I was CTO of Artsy then.)

tl;dr The README became possible because Artsy is open-source by default, and someone just decided one day to create a repo and some content, and didn't need permission to do so. It's also the repo that most new hires read before they even apply to the job, and they don't need permission to make changes either. GitHub workflow is how everything gets done.

More practically, check out https://github.com/artsy/meta/pull/1, which is one of the repos that merged into the handbook via https://github.com/artsy/README/pull/1. Also note that Artsy was founded in 2010. This handbook in its current iteration is 7-8 years in, but its content goes back to ~2011 in some kind of evolution. You'll want to check out https://artsy.github.io/blog/archives/ as well.
Gravity acts over time, if you are slowly lowering it you could be expriencing the same force practically as on the way up.

The reason you don't do it for powerlifting is because you're more likely to injure yourself after a max effort lift (like a one rep max lift in competition). Since you exerted maximally on the way up and may struggle controlling it on the way down it while exhausted. All the other compound lifts in powerlifting end at the finish of max exertion so don't have that issue.

If you are only training for general reasons you might not run into it, but if you are a powerlifting athlete doing 5, 3 or 1 rep sets for comp then this is good advice.
Most of my local banks stopped opening at all. Idk if they have safety deposit boxes that can't be accessed now.
You can use oil - that works too!
Do you fry in >400 degree oil? There are many foods that are fried in olive oil for example in Spanish food. It seems fine since most frying is done well below the smoke point.
Cheating used to be super common to focus on eccentric for a lot of exercises but it seems like it fell out of favor since I first started lifting.

There's also chains and other equipment to help in this regard but I've found that going 2x or 3x as slow as concentric increases difficulty a lot.
The headline is clickbait.

Much of [Athenian government] income came from publicly owned farmland and silver mines that were leased to the highest bidders, but Athens also taxed imports and exports and collected fees from immigrants and prostitutes as well as fines imposed on losers in many court cases. In general, there were no direct taxes on income or wealth.
In case you are seeking an answer, consider that birds instinctively build nests but (most) don't put roofs on them although the process would be a logical continuation of what they can already do.

Because what they have is good enough.

Without selective pressure, evolution just dithers around what already works.

There will be reasons they got to where they are, that they remain just indicates those reasons have not gone away.
I thought it was just a label at first. That's funny.
Fadell complains about his parent company, but he doesn't seem to be great on the other side when Nest acquired Dropcam:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11382242

Both CEOs pointing fingers at each other for the failures.
Wells Fargo — which in recent years has admitted to systematically ripping off customers with fake accounts, hidden fees and a variety of unwanted and unnecessary financial products — didn’t follow that law.

I normally don't like the NYT and I know it continues to get worse, but we need more of this calling our bullshit plainly. I wish we had this in the Canadian media, most of our big companies (and all our banks) are criminal, better to just say so and not tiptoe around it
Yeah I'm pretty sure this was something bodybuilders doing HIT knew about decades ago.
I don't think the things that makes programmers gag is plain old XML. As other comments noted, the markup/content ratio is a matter of your choice. And, as opposed to binary formats from the 80's and 90's, human readable (and debuggable). What I think makes programmers gag is the soul-killing universe of standards around XML and that there's always some architect or data person mandating their use. Things like SAML and XML signatures are a nightmare. Having to author a schema document or use a dozen namespaces every time you want to publish some data just makes it a drudge. XSLT was a bust. Average people didn't get it. You needed a rocket scientist to author the transforms. Let's not forget the joy of SOA and authoring WSDL documents. It wasn't XML, it was the uptight world of standards, best-practices, design by committee, and mandates that grew up around XML.
I hope this trend will die off soon. Touchscreens have are neat and have a place, but nothing beats a nice feeling button in just the right spot for common use cases.

Car reviewers have been complaining about this for years so it seem like either I/we are crazy and _most_ people actually like screens for everything, or that the pipeline for implementation of controls is sooo long in duration that manufacturers haven't caught up to the feedback from like-minded users.
I created a smart planner app at a similar age [1] and I'm now in my third year of university studying CS. I've also had a taste of industry from building a journal app as a freelancer [2], interning at a department of my uni [3] and interning at Wise [4].

- The whole js, css, html, react stuff sounds more like a beginner web dev bootcamp that should last a few months rather than a 3-4 year CS degree. Avoid that.

- Sometimes YouTube is great. E.g., a playlist from a Cambridge lecturer [5] was immensely more valuable than the live lectures I was being delivered alongside 200+ other students. I don't think lectures are efficient but I typically have a mix of lectures + labs + coursework and now, a substantial individual project supervised by a researcher. I'm excited for the future of edtech and programs like OSSU [6] are great if the focus is purely on absorbing CS content but its limited.
Something else I found is that the modules I dreaded the most and certainly wouldn't have opted into had they been optional were the ones I learned the most from. Who knew that an Interaction Design class would be so relevant for doing customer discovery in a startup.

- No doubt that you can also have an income while studying.

- Pick up an internship to learn from experienced software engineers.

- The life experience is something I'll miss dearly, be it sports, socialising, dipping into the startup culture (We have an on campus accelerator).

- I stress more about turning down jobs than worrying about not having one.

If you have access to a quality CS degree that doesn't cost you a kidney then go for it.

[1] https://github.com/Cheon-App/planner
[2] https://reflection.app
[3] https://the-ciru.com
[4] https://medium.com/wise-engineering/wise-engineering-interns...
[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEAMfLPZZhE&list=PLeKd45zvjc...
[6] https://github.com/ossu/computer-science
The connectionist approach is disturbing to me when taken to its logical extreme, which for me is essentially a variation of the paperclip maximizer only the target is "consume as many resources as necessary to build the best approximation of human like intelligence."
Its obvious by bow that there are two camps. Those who believe in Searle’s Chinese Room Argument and thus are worried about AGI being purely logic and thus cold and dangerous and then those who believe that AGI will ultimately have culture emotions and thus some will be good some will be bad but the more we treat them like us the friendlier more of them potentially will be.

Gary Marcus is in the former camp and IMO not only wrong, but disingenuous.
> everything evolves

Not necessarily, some things go extinct.

Or, evolves in to what?

Perhaps we can be certain that every changes. Maybe that's cyclical too.
Bell Labs was an engineering driven wild west, ATT is much better now /s
An article talking about this: "Monkeys Trash Theory of People in Americas Tens of Thousands of Years Ago" https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2023-01-05/ty-article/mo...
Here's the bookmarklet you've been waiting for...

javascript:(function()%7Blet%20s%3Ddocument.querySelector(%22main%20svg%22).getBoundingClientRect()%2Ccx%3Ds.width%2F2%2Bs.x%2Ccy%3Ds.height%2F2%2Bs.y%2Cr%3Ds.width%2F3%2Cd%3Ddocument.querySelector(%22main%20div%22)%2Ca%3D0%3Bfor(let%20e%3D0%3Be%3C50%3Be%2B%2B)%7Ba%2B%3DMath.acos(1-Math.pow(60%2Fr%2C2)%2F2)%3Blet%20t%3DMath.round(cx%2Br*Math.cos(a))%2Cn%3DMath.round(cy%2Br*Math.sin(a))%3B0%3D%3De%26%26d.dispatchEvent(new%20MouseEvent(%22mousedown%22%2C%7BclientX%3At%2CclientY%3An%7D))%2Cd.dispatchEvent(new%20MouseEvent(%22mousemove%22%2C%7BclientX%3At%2CclientY%3An%7D))%7Dd.dispatchEvent(new%20MouseEvent(%22mouseup%22))%7D)()
I don't know if they were looking at XSD, but I did write an XSD to JSON Schema[1] converter in an afternoon which does an almost perfect 1:1 mapping of a non-trivial XSD, including choice elements, basic restrictions etc.

So for a lot of XSD's I'd say JSON Schema is effectively very close.

Sadly, tooling for the latest JSON Schema (which is required for choice elements IIRC) is lacking, Swagger UI for example does not work well with it for example.

[1]: https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/json-schema-core.html
This storm affected trains too <https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/amtrak-can...> <https://chi.streetsblog.org/2022/12/28/the-polar-vortex-expr...>. What was the last weather event that resulted in significant disruption to air travel but didn't disrupt rail travel?