skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yep.

The trend over time could equally be capturing changes in referencing practice (either that really important, influential papers/inventions in the past didn't reference other really important, influential papers/inventions nearly as often as equally novel papers/inventions today, or that modern referencing is much more exhaustive about referencing minor and tangentially relevant papers/inventions. There is, of course, also more significant prior art in journals and patent indices to actually cite in later years...). They carry out some robustness checks, but I'm not sure any of them really dent that hypothesis. It's also a conclusion based on proportions (ie. the effect mostly comes from by there being a lot more "non-disruptive" papers published rather than fewer "disruptive" papers) and there's actually a trend rise in the raw number of "most disruptive" academic papers from the 1950s through to the 1990s, at which point the numbers drop so sharply it looks like a discontinuity in the data (but would probably coincide with lots of journal content becoming easily accessible online...)
I don’t see any justification for (1) given steam has a 2hour refund window.
We contacted CircleCI support and they clarified their blog post statement with the following info:

"Thank you for contacting CircleCI Support.

This does also apply to SSH Keys, as such we do recommend to rotate SSH Keys as well as to take extra caution.

If you have any other concerns please reach out."
> you can find this explanation in the mod commentary.

If the guidelines are unclear, and arbitrarily rule non-articles in as articles, then they must be rewritten to make the fiat clear.

> Our 'legacy of textual culture' contains a huge variety of formats and representations. The notion that some single one is a representative standard, let alone has lasted for millennia is not an accurate one.

Irrelevant, as no-one made that claim. Your unevidenced insistence on your personal take on a novel tech as inarguably part of a historical tradition is just quiet shouting. I disagree, but agree it's arguable. You think it's not arguable, because it's obvious to you, and you believe what's obvious to you should be enforced.
In the law? No; but, this is the sort of thing that people who care about equality in pay should look at and refuse to work at. If there can be an 800k difference between two different employees with the same title that sit next to each other, that's not a place I would want to work for and wouldn't even apply.
For starters, I think you'd have to show damages.

Ps. I'd be happy to make a small donation to your lawsuit.
Segway was pricey and not super useful imo. Utility trumps everything else. If something dramatically improves people’s lives it will get adopted. Unless laws or regulations prevent it ofc (the way undocked electrical bikes were banned everywhere ;_;)
I'm assuming different wheels are accelerating at slightly different speeds so you aren't hitting the pavement with a tread going at full speed. It needs to adjust to the different speed of your gait at different points of your step.

That's why the "tank tread" likely wouldn't work here.
This is a clickbait title with a plagiarized article from Propublica. Propublica makes mention of the fact that this never got off the ground:

> “Despite efforts from Google and many at the Department of Defense, our work with JPC unfortunately never got off the ground”

Second, I don't see any harm in sharing public data (anonymized of course) with any private or public research organizations. Isn't advancement in medicine good? Are these negative reactions only because its Google?

I'd have a problem if Google said that only they can have this data or something nefarious, but there is nothing in the original article to suggest that.
It's faster even if the PostgreSQL instance is on the same box. If PostgreSQL is on a different box, then it's a lot faster.
With the caveat that I do not know the specifics of this case, I agree in principle with giving health companies access to large amounts of data like this. Research like this could save a huge amount of lives, but it needs lots of data, which is currently quiet difficult to collect. Ideally there'd be some sort of central, deidentified repository of data that all researchers can access for free. But in the absence of that, I'll take what I can get. I've lost too many people to cancer; I'd sacrifice a lot to see better diagnostics. Maybe I'm strange, but I don't care if Google or any other healthcare has access to all of the x-rays, mris, and blood tests that I've ever done provided that they're deidentified.
The military are already having a very difficult time recruiting people. Not for a lack of interest but for a lack of physical qualification. [1] This behavior will not help them get more people.

I foresaw something like this when I served and had to fight them on DNA collection. I neither won nor lost but I stalled them long enough to get out. That was my commander's idea. It went all the way to Al Gore via FoIA and came back down as several boxes of paperwork that were worded more vague than a car commercial as to what the data/dna could be used for, how long they could keep it and who would have access to it.

[1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWN13pKVp9s (2012)[video][16 mins]
Colorado has a similar law, but I've never observed this kind of "range-hacking." Why would this happen in CA but not CO?
Meta implements proxy support in WhatsApp
Regarding point 2. Also, there's no way to run a build/compile step for running 'javascript' to catch these type errors before runtime. Would we bring Node into the CI just to catch those errors?

So you may be right, it seems typescript will still be around for enterprise at least.
>Do engineers not take calculus anymore these days?

Yes, we do, like a decade ago at school when we were forced to learn it. Then the knowledge atrophies unless you're actively using it in real life.

The majority of engineers I know, including myself, work on some form of web services, mobile apps or FOTM UI frameworks, and you don't need calculus to style a progress bar or query a database
Seems overzealous imho. A razor a5 lux is likely faster, $100 and gives you the infinite potential energy differential available on any hill. And it only weighs as much as a gallon of water.

I’m curious how much better this is from simply skating with inline skates.
Potentially, there's a lower glass ceiling in the UK
Disclosure: I’m a vet and work in tech.

On one hand, the DoD playing chess with plug and play resources that Soldiers are. Tech employees being willfully blind to the ethics of this. No surprise either way, China got my data via OPM anyway.

On the other: sick! That’s great Google has the medical records detailing people’s worst moments from war (TBI, PTSD. amputations) or others (spousal abuse, drug abuse), all for a good product! A maxim vets are pretty good at following is your DoD past stays with you and the VA, but that’s great Google gets to poke under the covers too. Hope the product is useful for an OKR. This doesn’t stop with pathology slides from days of yore and we all know it.
All of those examples have the exact same limitation, they can't replace processes that create novel ideas since they're statistical recombinations of existing ones.
Like every Austrian company every that quotes the CBA minimums on all job postings. Unless you are really running out of candidates there is no reason to post actual numbers.
Million dollar question:

Do you have a god-damned email verb for twiml ?

I mean, seriously. Twilio could allow (verified-ownership emails only) for the simplest possible email integration into twiml for the sole purpose of alerting and paging, etc.

No spam possible since it's only verified account-controlled emails. Basically sending email to yourself from within twiml.

But no. Instead they bought sendgrid and email integration is a complete abomination of a two-company, two platform, two accounts workflow that is fragile and fails all the time.

So ... do you ?
Are we seeing this sort of insult in all CA companies? Or just Netflix so far? It could just be Netflix being harmful to its present and future employees.
Accountable for what? What wrongdoing are you alleging and what is your evidence?
Google does not operate in mainland China.
It's more about transactional vs analytical systems. You want those decoupled. You can absolutely still use a relational DB for your analytics database, it can even be column oriented and vectorized if you want.
As you age your ability to recover from wear and tear decreases and even without catastrophic injury it will catch up to you eventually.
Seconded. Shouldn't have done the crime if you weren't prepared to face the consequences.

Even if you were to start your own company, someone would dig up this information and use it to drive you back to square one. Like parent comment and many others have echoed, white collar work may not be in your line of sight for years to come. If I was you I'd start practicing with a spatula or a shovel.
Directional drilling, electrical, road striping, traffic control, etc etc.
Aren’t relevant salary ranges supposed to save HR and the applicants time in the job search process?
https://archive.md/ghOEB
Ask HN: Bogleheads-Like, but for Europe?
Is there any good alternative to the US-focused Bogleheads, but for Europe?
I tried playing today and the motion sickness hit me hard. Haven’t had much of a problem with it previously.
This inspired me to dig around a little more, and the details at https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/operations/settings/settings#... leave me more confident you can do large joins if your flow requires them. It still looks like CH's default setting is extra work if you're used to writing queries and letting the query planner worry about join strategies.
They held first place for a good while, though.
Wrapping abstractions around hard problems is pretty much Twilio's value prop.
> This market range is based on total compensation (vs. only base salary),

Even if not the case here, isn't that to be expected then? Volatility in share price will put a big range in that figure for companies with less of the total comp in cash base salary.
I know a couple of Netflix employees making over 700k cash. I also have a friend who was a recruiter at Netflix that handled an offer to an engineer for $1M cash. These are real numbers.
Not including those is a pretty good "Security feature"
Yeah. Nevermind though...
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?"

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/747-if-we-knew-what-it-was-...
LiteFS is meant to get write forwarding in an upcoming release, so you could use maybe use that to sync, assuming the writes are less than about 10/s.
Okay then, present your citations. And don’t just copy paste a bunch of studies saying willpower can be practiced. I’m saying there’s a chemical basis for motivation and willpower, which is also backed up by science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesolimbic_pathway
There are multiple hosts, but yeah I doubt our admins would go for 1 service per host, plus they'd just be on VM's sharing the same hardware anyhow.
I think you’re misunderstanding the comment. This headline was explicitly comparing to M1s, and the commenter is saying that many people with M1s aren’t using it solely for performance reasons, they’re using it for macOS. In that case it doesn’t matter the perf AMD gets as they’re still not running macOS.
I, personally, would be 100% fine with this, as long as:

1. My data was anonymized.

2. At least in the Navy's case, that there was some assurance that some of the work would be made available back to the public, i.e. if all the data was tagged and organized in a way that an open source data set could be made (again, anonymized), but the analysis and any models built would be proprietary to Google.

I honestly don't understand why the knee jerk reaction would be to be upset at your simple exercise.
I've been running for 40 years, and lifting for 15. Lifting has virtually eliminated my back pain. Strengthening the muscles helps a lot in preventing injury.

No, I'm not lifting 400 lbs. Weightlifters lift insane weights, does that compare to what physical laborers lift?
You're correct but that is still a niche segment because markets that need 128MB of super-fast memory are almost always happy to pay a little bit more to get 4GB+ of "L4" (aka DRAM).
This comment doesn't even begin to capture how off (and concerning) the data is. I'd love to see some demographic analysis of funding.
Like VLC? I like the prefs in that. Not exactly easy to navigate, but easy to find something you Googled.
Being paid in HNT crypto to run the device. With a $250 box and the HNT pricing around $15-$20 and on the rise, people were making thousands mining a 100+ coins a month deployed in a half decent location. The buying demand for these miners went through the roof and people were waiting 9-12 months to get one. Easy to buy one now but likely only to mine around 4 coins a month due to halving and price decline. HNT coin is around $1.70 right now.
Not too different from the dot com. The craziest valuations didn’t last for that long but the bubble built up over a longer time
It’s not flaunting a law. It’s a typical built in Sacramento law written by dilettantes who can’t think through the simplest of problems.

Just like the “can’t charge extra for using a credit card” law. Prices went up and gas stations give a cash discount.
That's because it was the Christmas holidays, and apparently, I have a life...

Things are being added now though.
The minimum salary paid for a position is useful information. The median or estimated median may be as well. Legislated disclosure of a maximum is useless. It implies that employees are interchangeable widgets with a cap on their market value that isn't more than some reasonable percentage of the minimum.

There are true superstars out there that some companies can afford to compensate properly, but they are generally remarkably atypical and their salary is irrelevant to what a person of ordinary talent and experience can expect. I think it is great that some of them are worth and can be paid nearly $1M / year, but I wouldn't expect that to be relevant to the salary negotiation of most engineers taking a job with similar duties.
Does anyone else disagree with kebab case over snake case?
I wonder what follow-through the law has to fix/avoid this kind of behavior?

I know some companies are now working to ensure that they no longer have a single listing for a job into which you could hire people at different levels, so that they can better honor the spirit of the law. It would be nice if the law itself ensured had a way to enforce or ensure that sort of behavior, but I don’t know what that would look like.
No. There's a lot of climbing up stairs, pulling on things, and stopping quickly to stay out of the way of multi-ton vehicles with dangerous pointy things on the front (forklifts). Your feet hurt enough walking on miles of concrete all day, these would not even pass safety standards, falling is already too much of a hazard to want a fancy roller skate on one's feet.
Note that PSRAM is just a DRAM with an easier interface. It's not at all comparable to true SRAM.
Pex | Multiple positions | REMOTE (United States, Canada, and Europe), FULL-TIME | https://pex.com/careers/

Pex is on a mission to democratize digital rights for everyone. We are the team behind the Attribution Engine, a licensing infrastructure for the Internet enabling fair compensation and increased access to content. With its advanced identification technology, Attribution Engine ensures compliance and safety for platforms, gives rightsholders total control of their content, increases access and confidence for creators, helps law enforcement prevent toxic content, and provides brand safety for advertisers.

[0] We are hiring for numerous positions [1] to help us bring our services to the masses:

- Engineering Manager
- Senior Support Engineer
- Senior Database Administrator
- Customer Success Manager

For all employees, we offer:

- equal salaries within each region
- equity, with a 10-year exercise window
- 401(k) with a considerable match for all US-based employees
- 30 days of paid time off + 9 local holidays + the day off on your birthday
- 99% covered health benefits for US-based employees, 70% for dependents
- generous paid parental leave
- a fully remote work environment, supportive culture, and excellent work-life balance

To learn more, reach out to us at hire@pex.com and read about our hiring process and culture in our blog posts titled:

- Interviewing at Pex? Here's what you can expect during our hiring process [2]
- Pex culture: Focusing on what really matters [3]

—

[0] https://pex.com/blog/pex-announces-57m-in-new-funding/
[1] https://jobs.lever.co/pex
[2] https://pex.com/blog/interviewing-at-pex-heres-what-you-can-expect-hiring-process/
[3] https://pex.com/blog/pex-culture-focusing-on-what-really-matters/
Do they still use the old PT model for fitness upkeep?

Culturally that was like telling people you can walk to work...even if you work 20 miles away. Our society needs more interesting and subjectively calibrated brain food for fitness maintenance.

Ideally they could switch to a relatively flexible multi-model fitness system. Give a bit more freedom and education to people who showed they are willing to fight for it. And if somebody still wants PT? Go for it.
Why is this not set to zero dollars be default?!?

I agree with other comments here. $0 is the minimum amount people should be willing to pay if they're not disputing charges or reporting fraud to the credit card networks / regulators.

Time is money, after all.
Ask HN: Has anyone been able to get ChatGPT to change its behavior in any way?
Ask HN: Has anyone been able to get ChatGPT to change it's behavior in any way? I just had a fairly unproductive conversation with ChatGPT and after I was "over it" I asked it if it would please stop asking ~if there is anything else that it could help me with~, because I was slightly irritated at it. It nicely said it would, but then just kinda didn't do it. It kept not doing it over and over again. Is this sort of request not possible or am I not doing it right? (plain text transcript via copy/paste below:)

When speaking to me, would you please not end your response with something like "is there anything else I can help with?"

Certainly, I apologize if my responses have been repetitive or caused any frustration. In the future, I will try to be more mindful of my language and not include that phrase at the end of my responses. Is there anything else I can assist you with on this topic or is there another topic you would like to know more about?

When speaking to me, would you please not end your response with something like "Is there anything else I can assist you with on this topic or is there another topic you would like to know more about?"

Understood. In the future, I will try to be more mindful of my language and not include that phrase at the end of my responses. Is there anything else you would like to know or ask about?

You just did it again. This time you communicated: "Is there anything else you would like to know or ask about?" I'd like you to not do that again. Can you please comply with my request?

I apologize for not complying with your request. I will make sure not to include that phrase at the end of my responses in the future. Is there anything else you would like to know or ask about?

You did it again. This time you wrote: "Is there anything else you would like to know or ask about?" I'm asking you to please stop doing that.

I apologize for the oversight. I will make sure not to include that phrase at the end of my responses in the future. Is there anything else you would like to know or ask about?

Ummm. Listen. Simple request. Do not ask me if there's anything else I would like know after you provide your response.

I apologize for any confusion my previous responses may have caused. In the future, I will make sure not to include any phrases at the end of my responses that ask if there is anything else you would like to know or ask about. Is there anything else you would like to know or ask about at this time?
Lets not forget threatening Carmack over bullshit stencil shadows patent and forcing EAX into Doom3.
That’s fine but, there are probably multiple levels that have been glommed into one req…which makes it look not great. There should be jr, sr, principal, staff, etc.
I would expect Postgres to be faster for complex operations over large datasets (of course with a helping of "It depends!"), but very interested in knowing if this is generally untrue.
If there's one thing that I've learned hanging out on /r/freelance, it's that most people are not cut out to be business owners.
Or they're complying in good faith. They may very well be flexible and not really care if they hire a fresh out of school grad or a seasoned expert with a rockstar resume. They'll hire either and pay accordingly.
Let’s say you have a hundred databases and you want to do a schema migration. You could naively do all of them at once, but what if they take a long time, or if one fails? What then?

So you implement some thing to do rollbacks and retries. Now you’ve created a complicated monstrosity because you will have users dealing with potentially different databases with different schemas.

You were better off with a single database with a sharding key.
>>> As of now, the drones’ propellers are still somewhat noisy. But as quiet drone technology becomes available, they’ll be able to add it to the existing framework.

So really everything you would expect from hanging a speaker from a drone, noisy and power hungry.
I’ve been around this stuff for 7 years now, former co-founder was super into AI hype and actually ended up leaving to go work for OpenAI. Nothing is snowballing fast now… it’s been the exact same since at least 7 years ago.

At the time I have to admit I was equally bullishly myopic, the new models seemed insanely cool and the process seemed super-exponential. I predicted AI may replace programming, art and many things within 5 years.

Then I checked in 5 years later - not much really had changed and I revised my predictions way down. Since then I’ve revised them down again actually, as I see them running into scaling issues again, amongst many other issues.

The attitude you take is infectious, I saw it firsthand. But if I look at what concrete is changing, it’s not much.

Humans love watching Chess. It’s exploded in popularity in the last 4 years. No one watches AI chess, though the top players certainly gain in their practice from it. But where’s the revolution?

I know it’s different but I predict the same happens across the “new” areas - image and text generation. They seem amazing, likely beating humans in many ways. But in the end we don’t care much about computers, we care about novelty.

Novelty and humanity drive fashion, music, film, literature… basically all art. It needs to innovate, needs to be extremely personal. It’s not going to disrupt any of them, not even close. But it will be used in the loop.