skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A helium leak is not as bad as a refrigerant. Also given it’s solid tune with no moving parts, I would think the leakage of helium would be minimized.
Nuance is a foreign concept to most on Reddit regardless of what your opinion is; I really wouldn't bother with it for anything of substance. The exception is when you need an answer to a very specific question on one of the niche subreddits.
The Coming of Age of De Novo Protein Design [video]
So pythonistas are anarchists now.
My company is currently undergoing this and I have the same feeling.

But I think the business model behind it is you hire a "Salesforce consultant" to steer your integration with the understanding that you can replace a small team of developers doing a home-rolled solution with a single developer who runs your SF integration. And Salesforce slurps up 60% of the labor cost savings and you keep the 40% and declare success.
> You thought the first page of Google was bunk before? You haven't seen Google where SEO optimizer bros pump out billions of perfectly coherent but predictably dull informational articles for every longtail keyword combination under the sun.

> Marketers, influencers, and growth hackers will set up OpenAI → Zapier pipelines that auto-publish a relentless and impossibly banal stream of LinkedIn #MotivationMonday posts, “engaging” tweet threads, Facebook outrage monologues, and corporate blog posts.

I think there's a bright side if people can't compete with machines on stuff like that. People shouldn't be doing that shit. It's bad for them. When somebody makes a living (or thinks they're making a living, or hopes to make a living) pumping out bullshit motivational quotes, carefully constructed outrage takes, or purportedly expert content about topics they know nothing about, it's the spiritual equivalent of them doing backbreaking work breathing in toxic dust and fumes.

We can hate them for choosing to pollute the world with that kind of work, but they're still human beings being tortured in a mental coal mine. Even if they choose it over meaningful work like teaching, nursing, or working in a restaurant. Even if they choose it for shallow, greedy reasons. Even if they choose it because they prefer lying and cheating over honest work. No matter why they're doing it and whose fault it is, they're still human beings being wasted and ruined for no good reason.
Don't you like your boilerplate to be correct?
You are entirely ignoring the revenue generating portion of slave labor in this analysis.
Might get removed in the future [0], though!

[0] https://lwn.net/Articles/774734/
British Museum in talks with Greece over return of Parthenon marbles
I have a Stream Deck that I set up to change the LCD's based on what the current in focus application is. I also have a button on each of the custom screens that gets me to the "Main Macro" pad.

I strongly recommend them for programming.

They save me so much time.
What Is a Particle? (2020)
While the lock-in is real, there are other platforms that are catching up fast. My firm does Salesforce to HubSpot migrations as part of our services, and it's getting easier and easier to switch. Still takes time to retrain and shift business processes to a different philosophy, but we almost always see better usage of the platform, better data, and happier users.

HubSpot is not a replacement for hugely complex organizations that needs to dump tens of millions or more into a Salesforce instance (software + labor), but for mid-size and below it's great.
>though a non-monodimensional individual would value these 4 goals as equally important.

Being multi dimensional doesn't imply that, does it? They could have many dimensions, without it being beach or city collecting?
This is my primary concern as well. I just wrote another comment and even used the same sky example before reading yours.

The technology is cool, but until we can trust the answers it provides, it's just a fun toy. Nobody is seriously asking their Alexa today how to perform open heart surgery and accepting the response as gospel, but that's kinda where we are at with ChatGPT! The confidence it exudes is incompatible with learning, unless you like to be taught complete bullshit 50% of the time and then carry on with your life none the wiser.
> And, and I can tell you that we got pretty far along with an internal Arm design, and it was very, very clear that you if you’re delivering a certain level of performance, the delta in power driven by the ISA is like 5 percent. [1]

Power matters a lot and 5% isn't almost nothing. And that's an estimate from an x86 vendor.

Agreed that it's almost certainly third though behind process and design. Intel's CPU leadership for a long time of course is not unconnected with its process leadership.

[1] https://www.nextplatform.com/2022/10/03/the-steady-hand-guid...
Some tips if you go this way:

- Use CloudFront in front of your S3 bucket, in this way you get custom domains and HTTPS and decrease requests (and its associated costs) to the S3 origin. Don't bother with S3 website hosting, unless you're using another CDN to front the website. Even then, I'd rather use CDN -> CloudFront -> S3 just to prevent setting the bucket as public and leverage some behaviors (see below)

- On CloudFront, remember to set a default root object (this is the index.html file)

- If you are using a router on your SPA, set CloudFront to handle 403 and 404 errors as custom responses - return 200 with the path set as your /index.html

- Getting 403 on CloudFront? Check your bucket policy first!

- Page not updating? Remember to invalidate the cache after updating the files in the bucket.

- Want to avoid CORS shenanigans? You can add your API Gateway endpoint as an custom origin with no caching on the same distribution but on another path.
AFAIK this will spam your users' history
Taskbar Numberer [1] can do this as well (under Window 10). Startup command is

start "" "<apps>\7plus-Taskbar-Numberer\64\7+ Taskbar Numberer.exe" -v2 -hidewnd

[1] https://ramensoftware.com/7-taskbar-numberer
I spend a lot of time online and I don't think I've ever felt the need to weigh in on incest. So I dunno, maybe other people aren't the issue here?

Regardless - I wouldn't really worry too much about the opinions of people on the internet. In particular on very large communities like Reddit, the inmates are running the asylum there.
Anyone that is serious about engineering societal problems out of existence should take up prison reform as one of their highest priorities. People who compulsively break the social contract need to be separated from people who don't, but the present way of doing it is basically just an extended duration of torture where they're placed at the mercy of much worse criminals and corrupt guards, and really prevented from doing anything useful besides forced labor for little or no pay.
Show HN: Innovative startup working on 3D Stem Learning
Another possible guess, is that Google wants to start making their own CPU cores to beat Apple (I'm more along your guess, but I've seen so much Pixel-first AOSP development, that I have to doubt)
According to Google the average Salesforce employee makes $115,000/year, so double that and it's $230,000. By those numbers labor would be almost 50% of their revenue.
I agree. The point of my original point a good few levels up was that we have an active choice in the intervention of this tendency, so we can build a more humanist future where we all reap the benefits.

I'm not optimistic
It is generally advisable to announce potential conflicts of interest while touting a particular solution in every other comment.
Everyone is self-censoring these days, and you really need to operate within a limited persona if you have an online presence. If you aren't political, you don't really need to share controversial opinions online. That's just how it is. If you have a peculiar interest, you can still hide in the crowd and try not to use your main online identity on smaller forums. For example, various porn forums actually promote the idea of incest because it's an old and overdone taboo in the fiction they consume or something.
Not necessarily. Laws touching either 1st or 2nd amendment rights would both receive strict scrutiny[1], but that doesn't mean the outcome would be the same. To pass strict scrutiny, a law must be justified by a compelling governmental interest like national security or preserving the lives of a large number of individuals, be narrowly tailored to achieve that goal or interest and be the least restrictive means for achieving that interest.

Keeping children from buying guns serves the obvious purpose of stopping children from accidentally killing people. It's much less clear how a child accessing a video could kill someone.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_scrutiny
For-profit prison systems effectively split the profit between the company and the government, by bidding lower than an ethical provider could (even if we assume no backroom deals, which is a dubious assumption to make.)
I also found this useful, I was able to get an answer to "is this specific thing in this situation legal in this state" and have it produce correct references to the state code.

I don't actually care if it produces an incorrect answer or summary (it wasn't but that's irrelevant), the value is being able to take some complicated context that a search engine can't understand and say "look right here."
> I fail to see how any of that means that they have a soul that's somehow pro-union

Sorry, can you point me to who made this claim?
If you want to try this out today, I made an open source version using Google + GPT-3 - https://github.com/VikParuchuri/researcher.

It works by getting Google results, finding the most relevant text chunks in the pages, then passing them to GPT-3 to generate a summary. The summary includes sources, so you can verify the info.

It works well for research questions like "what is the best smartphone with a small screen?", or "how do large language models work?". It gives better answers than ChatGPT alone for these types of questions.

I'm finding that the biggest time savings is from not having to wade through SEO-spam pages to find the one relevant paragraph.
> In December, the West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation launched a pay-per-minute ebook policy, which charges inmates five cents (4p) per minute of reading. The fee equates to roughly an hour of prison labour.

"Rehabilitation", indeed.
> You want to have me? Give me good working conditions! I'm probably not alone.

At those conditions they also very much might not want to have you. And apparently the total package "industry prestige + working condition + pay" is attractive enough for just the right amount of people that they need.

You can argue that it's not a fit for you, but you can't argue that the equilibrium itself that has been reached between the industry and the workers is inherently wrong or that it should magically change in favour of one of the sides.
Anecdotal evidence of two people, my wife and I have in the last couple of years eaten our dinner around 5.30-6pm (we used to eat 7.30-8). We both work from home and often either eat with the kids or soon after them.

We don't really snack in the evening, maybe a small chocolate (as in a nice one from a chocolate box) at about 8pm.

We both sleep better and I have certainly lost a little weight. I would probably say I'm also less hungry in the morning too.

It's a routine that works really well for us, we are in the kitchen doing food for the kids anyway so why not eat with them or at least cook at the same time (they get big lunches at school). It's also opened up our evenings a little for more hobbies (and occasionally work).
That's not how this game works. The administration in charge at the time gets the credit/blame for everything that happens on their watch - whether they had anything to do with it or not.
I think for bitcoin to have a shot at fulfilling its stated goals it needs to mostly settle. Just stop outperforming every other asset*. It should happen in a few 4-year boom-bust cycles. Every new cycle is shallower than the previous one.

Until it settles, being most attractive speculative asset overshadows any other functionality it has.

[*] Every other boring asset that people usually invest in for more than 4years.
No, the best startups run healthily at -$424k/employee, so any positive number is really great.

(sarcasm)
Do you feel the urge to share these opinions in person? If not, why do you feel the urge to do so online? If so, then you can use the same approach you use in meatspace: discretion.
Hey there! I understand it can be frustrating to go through so many interview stages. For us it's important there’s enough time dedicated for both sides to get to know each other. Indeed, the process might be lengthy, but there's always the possibility to combine some of the steps. We're also keen to find folks who would stay long-term, so it matters to us that all the questions and perspectives are covered from both sides.

If you do end up applying, please do let us know you'd prefer to combine some interview steps and we'll see what we can do :)
>Most of the excitement about it has to do with anthropomorphizing a robot that "feels" like an intelligent conversation partner, but it's not

Literally no one I know that's excited about ChatGPT cares even one bit about the conversation aspect. No one I know is excited by the fact that it's a robot to talk to... They are excited by the fact that you can feed it code and errors and it can debug for you or you can give it code and it can write relevant documentation. Or you can give it tabular data and it can make charts and do basic analysis...

If you can't see the utility then maybe you should question your own creativity.
Pretty junky article, because it doesn't define the goal, and therefore cannot give any recommendations either. Is the goal weight loss? Is the goal sleep quality? Is the goal how to maximize muscle protein synthesis (and add weight)?

When it comes to weight loss (and when the right muscle sparing tools are in place, also fat loss) total Calories in vs Calories out dominates. Don't get fooled, both sides of the equation are moving targets so it's been extremely difficult to be precise with it even in research. and water weight changes add further confusion.

When it comes to other hormonal aspects though? meal timing matters, obviously. An extreme example that makes it obvious -- If you eat ~1500 calories from fats/carbs in one sitting, you're likely gonna want a nap in short order as your blood sugar and insulin excreted rise. Does that mean you'll gain weight? Depends on your caloric needs.

Another example -- Eating even 3 hours before bed time can affect sleep. So, for sleep quality, it's best to eat earlier and then stop.

Another example -- taking in caffeine blocks the clearing of adenosine (the feel tired hormone). So if you drink caffeine in the first ~90minutes of waking then you dont actually clear the adenosine as well, and then when the caffeine hits it's half life (about 6 hours later) you'll feel tired again. Solution: let your body clear adenosine naturally before you consume caffeine.
Why would you think that's fair? We don't choose our talents nor our passions. You should get a decent share of however much value you create. How much you like your job doesn't come into it because it's random.
So you don’t have actual arguments?

On my end I love Go executables because I know they’re fast, self contained with very little dynamic linking or dependencies, and I know I can (and do!) contribute easily.

I try to avoid Python tools because they depend too much on the installed Python version (even with 3+ I’ve had incompatibility issues), are generally slow (I use autojump because it’s best in class IMO compared to zoxide, z, or jump, but it’s slow as a cow), and sometimes suffer from bad error handling (the few Python tools I use like awscli routinely give me Python stack traces whereas Go or Rust tools rarely, if ever, fail that badly)

Now that you have an example, what are your arguments against Go tools?
So what is the gcc (or gas via gcc) compiler switch to make the RISC-V compiler backend yiled compressed instructions? I have been unable to find a working one in the documentation, and the beehive mind has been of no help either.
Many times frontline employees are purposely made powerless to assist with an issue where it’s very simple for a manager to fix something.

Even when frontline employees say “my manager will say the same thing” I’ve found that they often won’t and will easily resolve the issue.

Companies that do this simply don’t want to resolve your problem.
Yeah that’s bad management.

The trick is understanding when part of the company is genuinely not contributing, and since things are complicated, what other parts are entangled and need to be adjusted as part of the plan.

Just randomly laying off x% is like randomly removing x% of code to improve performance. It’s going to produce more pain than gain.
I do breakfast at 8 am and dinner 5:30 pm, with 2 scheduled snacks. I am never hungry outside those boundaries. Consistency is key, you will secrete ghrelin (hunger hormone) at the scheduled times once they are habitual. I don't think snacks in themselves are detrimental, but snacking at random (and at night) seems to be.
It's no longer the early 1990s. Back then there were less ties to social bonds in real life.

I think you should follow the same norms on social media as you follow in real life: IE, if you walked into most public places and said (what I won't repeat,) most people will think you're a weirdo and avoid you.

IMO: The biggest difference between now and the 1990s was that oddball discussions, (like that kooky thing I won't repeat,) was that the oddball discussions generally only happened with people who were looking for them. Furthermore, if you were a nutbag, you might get banned from a small message board or dial-up BBS, but you could just move on to another small message board. Places like "the well," Compuserve, and AOL came and went out fashion really fast, so your opportunities to re-establish yourself were frequent.

Now with much larger message boards, it's harder to re-establish yourself every 6 months to a year. (For example, if I repeat what you said in the original post, it'll show up on my Hacker News list of posts. I won't repeat it; but now everyone in Hacker News who wants to learn about your submissions will see your very weird comment above.)

So, do what you do in real life: Read the room, and keep your mouth shut about the topics I won't repeat. Learn to blend in, and learn to find like minds.
Welfare in the 21st century: The highest human deaths are from Air Pollution
It's not that more fine-grained classification is useful, it's that race is not a useful biological classification. To build upon your own example, neither skin color nor running ability nor what continent you came from can be used to tell us about other traits.

But I'll let Princeton sociologist Dalton Conely explain to you what you're getting wrong about the science.

https://nautil.us/what-both-the-left-and-right-get-wrong-abo...
Your prison could play the long game...

Have better conditions, and educate the prisoners better, reducing re-conviction rates and getting ex-prisoners back into work.

Then, lobby for the laws to be changed. Get prisons to be paid as a cut of future tax revenues from ex convicts. Let them bid per prisoner as what percentage of future tax revenue they want to house the prisoner.

In such a system, your prison would earn far more revenue and be far more profitable than 'worse' prisons.
No, if a private prison is paying a prisoner 0 to X$/hour the the charity might only be able to pay that same person 1$/hour more because the surplus for that labor is finite. However, that’s still an improvement.
>Normally I can buy or sell something if:

>1. My government will allow me to transact 2. My bank will allow me to transact

Cryptobros keep saying this.

What kind of fantasy world do they live in where the government and banks "normally" approve or disapprove of cash transactions?

The bank from which you have withdrawn the cash does not know or care what you use it for, and the government may care but good luck it finding out.

Remember, bitcoin is DIGITAL CASH as per the first sentence of the bitcoin white paper so like for like should be compared: analog cash to digital cash.

You used the word "normally". I don't think "normally" means what you think it means.

Crypto is insane. Incomprehensible. The perfect merging of paranoiac libertarians and immoral grifters forming a feedback loop of destruction that grinds up and spits out the masses in order to enrich the few at a scale that traditional banking could only dream of. Executives at Goldman Sachs are looking at the people running off with cash at all of the cryptoscams, the margins of miners, with jealousy because "duh jackbooted gubmint" says they have to like, obey the law and stuff.

Crypto is a symptom of something being wrong with society but I don't know what.

I do know that everyone I know personally who has been into crypto has either been an immoral scammer... or an imbecile.
What you're saying seems to confuse three things:

- the econonmic situation right now

- a possible future where storage is better

- the general case that's being stated, which is that nuclear is currently the best base load tech, unless you like burning gas.

I'm only talking about the latter.
I think the value of AI-generated "art" is that it can fill the gaps that must be filled, but nobody cares that much about. Places where we'd use stock art, couldn't bother hiring a competent translator in the past, generating a silly place holder logo for my side project till I can hire a real designer etc.
In San Francisco, "S&M" usually has a different meaning. It's not like Folsom Street Fair and Dreamforce aren't often around the same weekend.
Yes, fasting is just not eating.
Yes, extremely confusing article imo.

The use of promises and async await allow the unhandled rejections to bubble up, but they've put "Success" else "Failure" in their pseudocode which could be interpreted as a return (wouldn't bubble up without extra code in the callers) or a throw (would bubble up) - not filling in that part leaves too much room for interpretation as does using async await everywhere unless you are already somewhat familiar with what they're driving at.

My understanding of what's trying to be conveyed would be better explained by using something like the Result type in Rust paired with the ? operator (failures are returned early/bubble up but successes go through). They should have slapped together a result type in Typescript to get the point across.

Similarly in go you have multiple returns and the common `if err != nil { return err }` a billion times which I think is the same concept here, just much more verbose. How does that differ from the initial code in tfa? I'd say it's because the caller returns the callee's failure rather than constructing its own thing or continuing with logic.

Then there's also some monad discussion that I'm not fully qualified to give.
at the start of Russian invasion I helped geolocate one video, claiming that Russians entered Kherson. I found it after about one hour and posted on twitter tagging everyone I know. I got no feedback so got discouraged. But few months later, I noticed that France24 used my tweet to prove Russians entered Kherson and a lot of newspapers followed their lead. Pretty cool I was able to help in a minimally viable way to understand what was happening