skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I don't think it's up to you, legally speaking: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiQ_Labs_v._LinkedIn

> I mean, they could be nice and respect your robots.txt, but they certainly don't have to.

That case was limited to the CFAA, but you seem to get the gist of what I'm saying when I specified it's different when it's Microsoft doing the scraping. If Bing starts ignoring robots.txt and data still start showing up in their results, all the early 2000s lawsuits are going to be opened back up.

> It's possible that fair use law will be expanded to cover this case, but as constructed the output of these models is generally fairly derivative of any specific original, and so probably protected under fair use.

Unless there's a reason for them to be considered fair use, derivative works are going to lose a copyright suit. And what's the fair use argument? If I'm the only one on the internet saying something and suddenly ChatGPT can talk about the same thing and I'm losing money as a result, there's no fair use argument there. Search engines won those early lawsuits by being transformative (index vs content), minimal, and linking to their source. None of that would apply here.
https://archive.is/20230104062254/https://www.wsj.com/articl...
We have loan in France, and not credit score.

My understanding is that your income and work contracts are inspected, and that banks can see your other loans / lines of credit.

The rule of thumb is that your loans payment must not be above 1/3 of your income.

To check your income the bank will ask you for a tax document and pay stubs.

People buy house and cars, and the country did not start the sub primes crises in 2008.

Seems to work well enough.
I, too, thought Melissa was one of the most common names out there. The Wolfram Alpha link helpfully provided below shows that it peaked right before I was born, and is currently almost negligible.
It's really not if we're talking about the sum of payments to Russia from EU for oil/gas. Before the 24th, the share of Russian gas was hovering above 50% of total EU imports and when the price skyrocketed, the dollar value of imports did as well. Your link cuts off at Q2 2022, which is when the price was at it's highest. Since then, Russian gas imports have dropped off a cliff as well as the price. As of Dec 2022, EU imported only about 1/5 of the amount of gas from Russia that they did Dec 2021. Given the new (and planned) LNG capabilities, that percentage will only keep dropping.

So yes, EU did pay the most money they've ever paid for gas to Russia, but that was a one-off situation, which is not going to repeat. Russia overplayed it's hand.
Heat pumps do not generate any heat at all instead as the name applies they move (pump) heat.

It just happens that physics allow you to move 3 or 4 kW (maybe even more in future) of heat energy from outside air inside with 1kW of energy and thus the COP. And if you run the loop in reverse you get what is traditionally called air conditioning.

How traditional heat pumps do this is with a refrigeration cycle just like your fridge or freezer does basically by compressing and decompressing a gas.
They are sometimes DNA and sometimes RNA. They also usually have proteins and lipids surrounding the genetic material, providing some protection and also the means of entering a cell. When replicating, both the genetic material and those proteins have to be replicated.
I added the syntax error detection in 3.2. I hope it’s helpful!
With a permissively licensed chip running a permissively licensed Fuchsia kernel and the permissively licensed Android runtime atop that, Google can finally explicitly slam the door on people who think they get to contribute to Google projects, which should save a ton of money over the bureaucratic-slow-march approach they take today.

Because vendors won't have to release device kernels any more, and will be able to use arbitrary ISA extensions they're under no impulse to distribute, the industry will achieve the ultimate nirvana last enjoyed by AT&T before the breakup -- this hardware is not yours, we will not be releasing technical information about it, and God help you if we catch you opening it up!

It's been a long road but I really think we'll see the return of the "no user serviceable parts inside" sticker, only for phone software this time around.
I’m glade to know that “did a PhD in maths six years ago and work in applied mathematics” is now being long out of math. I see clickbaity titles are still doing fine in 2023.

Impressive result however.
I'm surprised there aren't more pagers besides `less` and `more`. Alternatives I've found online:

- https://linux.die.net/man/1/most (multiple files/windows at once)

- https://github.com/sharkdp/bat (uses `less` under the hood, syntax highlighting and git diffs)

- https://linux.die.net/man/1/lesskey (add parameters to `less`)

- https://github.com/ivanov/kanten (looks abandoned)

- "Just use vim" (and vim's paging is really good, so this is viable, in fact probably the most viable so far)

`less` is a great program, despite being old there aren't really many flaws. It's one of those tools that don't really need updates or improvements. But I do think there are a few features which would be nice to have (automatic ANSI coloring, tailing, syntax highlighting, support for files like sqlite and tar - which of which are in ov).

The one thing which `less` may have over `ov` (besides already being on most distros) is speed. `less` takes in really large files, or forever terminal output, and is still really fast. And I find that when I use `less` I use it with large files or terminal output often. Though I don't actually know if `ov` is any slower, it's something the dev should watch out for (I don't see "speed" mentioned in the README).
I remember that some small countries, running DPI in their up-link were just storing their whole encrypted traffic to - when this day comes - be able to decrypt the traffic and see who was conspiring against the government back in the days and then start the witch hunt. Maybe this day is coming. Maybe its already there for some degree.
Ask HN: What would make you attend a network for professionals in your niché?
We're a consultancy who are currently in the planning-phase of a new initiative where we want to establish a professional network for our clients (or anyone else interested in the tools and products we work with).

In Denmark where we reside, we have a term called "ERFA-group" ("ERFA" is short for the danish word "Erfaring" which means "Experience" - thus an ERFA-group is a place for people to meet and exchange ideas). Typically an ERFA-group is a mix between a facilitated session (eg presentation of a daily topic) and an open discussion or workshop between the participants.

I've both hosted and participated in groups like this before, but I feel like the crowd here on HN could certainly help me improve on the concept. I'm sure quite a few people in here participate in professional networks like this one - either open source projects or just professionally related arenas in general.

The question is really:

- What is it that keeps you coming back to a group like this?

- What kills your motivation to join a group like this (eg "subtle selling from the organizer")?

- What traits do a good professional community have in your eyes?

- Would you ever be willing to pay to participate in a group like this?

- What are the most important take-aways for you, when you spend time in networks like these (networking, knowledge, inspiration, peer-reviews etc.)?
When Intel was trying to make x86 phones a thing they supplied Google with an ahead-of-time binary translation system. The same could be done with RISC-V.
A hands-on approach to symmetric-key encryption
But I don't want to read just simple ChatGPT answer, if I wanna read detailed interesting article, for instance product review, travel blog, etc. so I fail to see how blogs and ChatGPT can't coexist. Sure, it will eliminate low value blogs providing just simple answers without going deep, but I don't see how it will affect deep value blogs.
I understand your point, and I had to argue on it a lot when introducing such changes. I think the answer is struggling for the right task, but again with some guidance. If the learning outcome is to learn to program, then I don't see why you should waste half a semester trying to figure out by yourself the technicalities that could help you go beyond a hello world. Similarly, I don't believe we should (nowadays) force people to write everything in the terminal using Vim. The additional cognitive load is too distracting that it prevents you from digging deeper.

One can say "but that's how I learned, and I am fine and shine today". This is probably true, but then I believe that such a person had the right background to anyway learn by themselves. I see our mission as teachers to help the students that actually need the help, rather than letting them give up too early, in favor of some kind of excellence evolution. And I believe that if we prepare the right groundwork (explaining all the ropes before we start pulling them), then even the more advanced students will be able to learn even more that they would by themselves in a more struggling environment.
Thanks for the reply and detailed info. I possibly have a job change lined up, will have a serious look again if that goes through.
>I tried the Quest 2 last year mostly out of curiosity for the use cases that Meta themselves would go on to push as the primary focuses of the Quest Pro; VR productivity and virtual monitors. I was left drastically underwhelmed at the time with the resolution and viewing experience from the Quest 2

That's not really a fair assessment of the Quest 2. The Quest 2 is just a budget (400 Euros) gaming console, and for that it works great.

A 400 dollar gaming console with a theoretical resolution of 1,832 × 1,920 per eye, is obviously not gonna perform well if you use it to emulate high resolution virtual monitors meant to sit further away from your eyes, further decreasing the perceived resolution, so you can read text and perform productivity tasks. Of course it will suck at that, but it was never meant to do that.

That's like complaining your Toyota Aygo sucks at offroading or track racing.
Bing is still a thing? That’s great!
In my case a fairly new C-class MB that decided that posts on bridges are in front of the car and not to the side and a large advertising board in a corner was about to be hit. In both of those cases the car turned what was a perfectly safe ride into instant near accident and if not for many years of experience I'm pretty sure the first would have resulted in a major crash. I got rid of the car after the second one.

Automatic emergency braking is probably great if all you do is highway traffic and stop-and-go but it really sucks that you can't disable it and that it isn't able to distinguish between safe and unsafe to a degree that it will turn a safe situation into an unsafe one all by itself. At that point in time a safety feature becomes a risk in itself. Possibly the statistics are still in favor of the solution but I'd rather take my chances.
Not for the last time :)

https://go.googlesource.com/go/+/refs/tags/go1.19.4/src/runt...
What makes you so sure of it?
LLMs are just the novelty of the moment, no empirical evidence yet indicates that it's the direction the industry is going to take, it could just be just another fad like VR or web3.
i admit i am not an expert on modern auto diesels (i remember my brother muttering about having problems with this on his Merc). but 1960's model diesel engines did not require a battery to start them.
> Adding another nail to the coffin claiming Russia blew up their own pipeline.

Or not. Blowing up NS1 to pressure Germany to allow NS2 to open wouldn't be inconceivable, while also pushing up the price of gas through other pipelines. It's risky and stupid, but that also describes most of what Russia's been doing the last 9 months.
I definitely don't think Vitalik is a scammer, but I find it not-so-ethical to take large amounts of money off the table before you've created value. Vitalik's wealth comes from hype, not from value in the world. He's not centrally responsible for generating the hype, and he's even spoken against it, but then he takes a ton of hype money off the table...
It would not. Certainly you can't use that organism inside a Human body. Your immune system would object - violently.

Another problem about HIV is that there are so few Virus particles "floating around" at any time, which (among other things) makes it challenging to fight with vaccines or pharmaceutics. And all Viruses are hard to get to when they are inside a cell, which is why the immune system mainly uses cell targeting mechanisms to get rid of viral infections, rather than the "humoral" defense of free floating antibodies (simplifying by a lot here).
Why does so much Mastodon 'criticism' boil down to this? There is much to criticise in how the protocol scales poorly, especially compared to Pleroma. Why does it always come down to "Someone was mildly mean to me and I couldn't report them and get them banned from every server. The Fediverse has fallen........"
Could you break down the costs of AWS?

From your post you say you needed a simple service plus a Postgres instance. I think you can have that for around $50 on AWS using a small EC2 and Aurora Serverless v2 (min $40/mo)
I've been hearing about how RISC-V is going to crush the market for over a decade, and the only fully-functional RISC-V-based product on the market is a soldering iron. Everything else is some kind of DIY proof of concept kit of no use to any actual consumer or business. The architecture has about fifteen or twenty years before they are any kind of meaningful threat to x86_64, assuming it lasts that long.
About the regex speedup, it looks like Ruby 3.2 is now doing this https://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html
We don't consume in a targeted fashion, we also don't have special mechanisms to get energy out of them.
Yes it has changed, but I would still live in rural France over rural US for the reasons aforementioned.
( typed from a small French placed :) )
Looks like another recurring movie where evil/young wizards (car manufacturers) would summon some attractive daemons for their own needs (profit/power) thanks to some new magic spells (IoT tech) without mastering it, leading to unintended consequences (vulnerabilities and bad exploits) that others wiser wizards (security researchers/industry) know for ages.

Not good, but seems to be the IT curse repeating again and again.
For those that don't want to read all the back and forth, it appears that the newest version of Open Lens has removed the pod log viewing and exec capabilities.

But Lens, the proprietary app that is built on the open lens code base, still has those features. The company (Mirantis) appears to be saying that is because Lens is still based on an older version of Open Lens.

There is a plugin system for open lens and Mirantis seems to have made the decision to extricate those two core features into plugins, which really seem like such core features that it doesn't make sense that they be plugins. They also seem to be saying that they will be maintaining the features as proprietary plugins and if any other distributions want those features, they will need to create and maintain their own plugins as well.
> Regardless of the problems in the US, neither the US nor any other country on the planet is facing a crisis like Japan.

I'm guessing you haven't followed what's been happening in eastern Europe the last few decades very closely? For example, Bulgaria has already lost about 30% of it's population since 1988 and is predicted to lose much more in the coming years.
May have found a bug thanks to your comment. Seems like the selected Item location is not being sent in the search query. Will check it out later on this week.
https://archive.ph/LUL45

‘Ukraine has achieved a cut-price version of what the Pentagon has spent decades and billions of dollars striving to accomplish: digitally networked fighters, intelligence and weapons.‘
Author here. Thanks for the feedback!

I agree I could have been more direct, but I also wanted to explain the concept in detail, especially for beginners to understand it. When I was beginning in the industry myself, it was difficult for me to understand abstraction, and the articles I was reading didn't really improve my understanding; they often speak about the way to create abstraction instead of explaining what is abstraction and why we need to abstract things. I don't have the presumption I did better, but I tried.

I speak about simplicity in the article; therefore about complexity, but indirectly. Maybe I should have been more direct on that point though.

And I also do many analogies with abstractions outside of software development.
https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/issues/18078
Mercedes diesels were push-startable well into the 1980s. They still had glowplugs (even in the 60s) and if you did have a battery they would heat up the precombustion chamber to lighten the load on the starter motor.
Seems like a great way to generate _initial_ testing sets, actually.
Pytorch/CUDA is apparently sometimes nondeterministic https://twitter.com/taliaringer/status/1511411984398487564?s...
> Removing the incentives so that we are back in 1990s internet, where by the way lots of quality blogs existed without ads?

What are you imagining would incentivize those vs today? The reality is those blogs still all exist, they're just harder to find in all the noise. You're mourning something that isn't gone.

Meanwhile ChatGPTBing will be happy to talk to you about quality subjects, sorry we don't search blogs anymore, though.
Wow. That was hilarious to read.
> But many of those are just not as reliable as core cloud providers

Aren't they? I've never heard this, do you have a source?

> the cost is way higher

Depends. For small-medium stuff the cost may be "way higher" in that it's dollars instead of pennies per month, but you have to weigh that cost against the cost of your time (how many months of PaaS hosting did the past week cost you in dev hours?). I'm sure the economics become significant at some scale, but I'd ask yourself whether they are at your scale

> and now you’re setting up a local stack that probably wildly differs from how it will work in production between those services

That doesn't have to be true at all; many of these services let you ship Docker containers if you want to (and manage everything else from there), but it's possible to go without even that: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34243045

I'd recommend taking a step back and seeing how much complexity is really necessary for what you're trying to do
A strange moment, when the Pentagon shows more self-restraint than allegedly intelligent hackers.
A few fruits which are common were the product of “atomic gardens”. Grow plants around a fixed radiation source, plant the resulting seeds, and see what grows.

Ruby red grapefruit is an example you can probably find in your grocery store. I think they made it by irradiating cuttings for grafting.
If your monolithic service OOMs, hits a large GC pause causing dependent requests to time out, locks a shared file descriptor, or a bunch of other things then the monolithic service as a whole can hit a fault or stall even if other threads/tasks are still executing. While classes of errors like OOMs go away when multiple processes are executing.
> Here's a decent write-up of some of the major issues that actually plagued that project, as opposed to "bad devs": https://blog.devgenius.io/cyberpunk-2077-through-the-lens-of...

All of those issues were there for their last project as well, but somehow they only failed this time even though they had a much larger budget and larger team with more developers. The most reasonable explanation is "bad devs", even though that will never be an official reason. When you swell the team size quality tend to take a hit, and when the old good devs becomes managers and the new devs try to replicate the work you often get problems.

That article describes how you need to work if you have bad developers. CDP-R assumed that they still had as good developers as they had previously, which wasn't true and that bit them.
Yea, this was surprisingly thick and decadent sarcasm. I loved it! I read:

> “That’s so cheems mindset,” says the woman he’s talking to. Her nametag says ‘Astra’, although you don’t know if that’s her real name, her Internet handle, or her startup.

...and I knew I had to stop what I was doing and finish the read. The other two "house party" links [1] [2] were equally rich.

1: https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/every-bay-area-house-p...

2: https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/another-bay-area-house...
As detailed in the other answers, there are two parts to this: 1) Creating a python package from your project (and possibly share this on pypi), and 2) Making this package available as an end-user application.

For step 2 you can use nuitka or similar, but if your audience is somewhat developer-oriented, you can also propose for them to use pipx: https://github.com/pypa/pipx.
this topic is so close to my heart just yesterday i posted about my new project which measures these metrics(don't worry will not plug it here!)
My take is that your measurment should give you some actionable insight and you should not measure absolute values. For example incident count, this looks like a useless metric to me because i can't tell what does high or low value mean, i also would need to look at team size to get anything useful out of it and that would not be very useful either. Same thing goes for lines of code, would 4 lines of lisp code mean i am less productive than 20 lines of c code?

Instead measure ratio of outgoing requests to incoming request if this ratio is greater than one or approaching one than you will not be able to execute with your current plan since you are not able to dispose issues in time. Your team is in danger zone and there is a risk of burnout of your team and non delivery of the project. This is also useful because you can go to the management team and tell them you need additional headcount and present this data and you are likely to get your request approved since it is backed by data.

Same thing goes for other metrics as well. Your metrics should be related to your goals they should clearly tell you if you can achieve your goal and how near/far you are from it.

Last but not the least don't forget about human touch since you are managing humans. Metrics should just be the starting point to dig deeper to solve the organizational issue they should not be used as final goal.
At least c++ has unique_ptr and friends. Standard containers like string, vector and map also reduce the amount of manual fiddling with fundamentals you need to do yourself, greatly reducing the mistake-surface.

But yeah, in the end both of them are very dangerous tools, compared to other alternatives.