skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It will be years before I have the same experience watching sports on a streaming service as on digital cable.

And for no technical reason, it's just monopolized broadcast rights to the games I want to watch.
Yes, Lisp was the first memory-safe programming language. And the rich data model is part of that.

Fortunately this is something other languages have been borrowing from for a while now, and explicit nullability via Option and the like is pretty common.
In theory yes but your wife wasn’t planning to earn that much money anyway, extra 5 years at a non profit probably won’t boost earnings much if at all.
That actually happens to a lot of families, the woman is often not that interested in bringing in income and just focuses on whatever she ways to do. That’s a luxury that many women get and that gets reflected in the salary averages
If you observe one tomorrow, then the theory is all wrong and people will all yell "Hey, new physics", celebrate, and try to discover why nobody has seen anything like it before. There is no "best prediction", the entire theory is invalid.

It would be like asking Newton "hey, if gravity didn't exist at all, and things traveled at path-dependent trajectories, what would your theory predict?" The answer is that it doesn't predict anything.
My bad, it's corrected!
Why does Ford still have an entire /8 (and even worse, completely unused)?
> ... and let that moment go - it has NOTHING to do with you.

This applies not only to bad behavior of others, but sometimes even to your own bad behavior. We are 'moist robots' as one cartoonist puts it, and the sane thing is to not beat yourself up for something stupid you did or say, but evaluate the whole stituation later when you are in a better state of mind, learn from your mistake, make amends, and move on.
Why is it surprising or out of place? How is this different from hotels that will not rent out rooms to prostitutes, even if they are not 'working'? I imagine it must be burdensome to AirBnB to distinguish the two scenarios, and it will likely ruin their reputation, same as drug dealing out of hotel rooms or airbnb properties would. If hotel chains have these databases of sex workers in their workers heads' (hotel managers presumably have lists or can recognize sex workers by sight), then why can't AirBnB build a database or use facial recognition to do the same thing? And hotels are not denying Muslims access to bookings, so why imply that AirBnB would/could?

I'm trying to understand how AirBnB, which necessarily has to rely on technology to perform these functions (that hotels already do via their employees) is such a threat.
> Blame is irrelevant, I find responsibility to be a more interesting thing to discuss

This is, to me, a bizarre notion. You're imposing some sort of moral edict upon cloudflare for providing an opt-in service to web hosts.

> they're in the best position to act

They have, and they decided that certain traffic requires additional consideration to distinguish from bad actors. Your refusal to cooperate is entirely on you.

Just because you don't like their solution doesn't mean that there is a better one. If you have better ideas, I'm sure they're all ears, as less intrusive is generally cheaper to implement.
NIST in consultations with various US public and private actors (including NSA) already determine the cryptographic algorithms that are used to run the internet. Canada is still very friendly with the US - the countries that have literally been bombed by the US - continue to use these algorithms.

Governments across the world have large gaps in their understanding of software and its relation to the world.
Thanks for the reminder. Greg Egan is one of the few SF authors where I don’t feel like I’m reading a “tech themed” fantasy story where the sci-fi elements may as well be magic.
You should really check if YouTube TV includes the channels you care about. My FIL loves sports and gets everything he wants.

I'm honestly not shilling, just... Fuck Comcast.
Firearm ownership regulations.
GPL depends on copyright! It literally depends on parts of copyright frameworks that grant authors to have fun gatekeeping others.

FSF guys had been fighting and defeating "you saying we stole GPL'd code is bogus because free internet stuff can't be stolen" for decades. It just makes no sense that you'd assume the foundation of GPL applies to code but not to images.
Progressive taxation and subsidies are completely within the realm of capitalism. It is regulation and government provision of services that push the system outside the competition benefits of capitalism. The Chinese system is straight up Austrian economics capitalism.

The prices weren’t regulated. The CT machine was a hand me down. The place operated with basically no management. It worked like a food court in Singapore.
> A federation of states works for the United States of America because our states are, at the oldest, merely 200~300 years old, with most holding common or at least very similar heritages

There's a reason for that, which is that the US conquered or subjugated its neighbors rather than peacefully federating with them, and US states accepted a substantially lower level of sovereignty than any EU member. Texas tried to "Texit" only 16 years after it joined the US, and it received far less accommodation than the UK did in leaving the EU.
I'm also in Ontario and Intelcom is my preference in delivery from Amazon. We get a few hours notice and a 4 hour window that has not been missed in 3 years. They even do pickup return well.

Prior to Intelcom the experience was quite a bit worse, especially when Canada Post was prewriting that you didn't answer and not even bringing the package. There are several videos on YouTube of people chasing them down.
There's at least one factor which I don't see consideration for here.

Under GDPR, CCPA/CCRA, and a number of other privacy laws, if you're going to retain data related to people you need to provide those people some way of retrieving that data or requesting that it be erased. Putting the data into a "deleted_record" table doesn't remove that obligation.

So, if you're going to have a bunch of "deleted" records hanging around, you need some way to figure out who they belong to. And I don't see any way to do that with this schema, short of rehydrating all the rows and following the original foreign key relations.
> Usually if you’re changing the way a primary function of the database works, like delete, it’s probably not a good move.

This isn't a soft delete -- you can't use the data for undeletion and it's not visible to an application that can see that table (as it would be in the case of a `deleted_at` column). It's only for analytical purposes, as the author says.
Yeah but the order 5% is likely outlier men (boomers) that earn disproportionately larger salaries and are slowly dropping out of the data set. The next group replacing them will have better gender distribution, it just takes time for the effect to flow through
I think this is an unpopular opinion, but I believe language package management systems try to solve solve the problem that has been solved by Linux distributions a long time ago, and they typically do it very poorly.

I suspect a prime reason is the absence of package management on Windows which a lot of developers (and users) use, and secondly the desire by developers to always use cutting edge library features when writing code, but nobody wanting to upgrade any dependencies after. There used to be a lot discipline about being compatible with many libraries versions IMO, nowadays people just specify the latest version of each library in their requirements.txt file (or equivalent in other languages).
When you've been at sea for months that's what happens.
How to rescue your assets from a compromised Ethereum wallet by using the power of Flashbots.
He's in a can, last I checked.
hilariously just so you know YouTube TV also uses this exact DRM technology if you were to try to screen record or screen grab while watching in Chrome
What makes you think it’s flawed?
In considering the rollout of IPv6, end users often get marginalized. This is frustrating to me. When we try to highlight ISPs who refuse to deploy IPv6, mobile services get highlighted - as if homes and businesses could just use them instead of wireline. If that doesn't end the discussion then IPv6 acolytes will go on about transit traffic or anything else until IPv4-only users go away and stop ruining their optimism.

Personally, I'm very positive about IPv6. I find a lot to like in the protocol. From an end user standpoint tho, it's very much a club. If your ISP is in you're golden. If not, you don't exist to other members.
This matches my process with GitHub issues. I try to start any piece of work my opening an issue where I describe the problem to be solved and then gather research on what code needs to be changed etc.

I wrote more about my process in https://simonwillison.net/2022/Jan/12/how-i-build-a-feature/ and https://simonwillison.net/2022/Oct/29/the-perfect-commit/

I sometimes call this "mise en place".
The real reason was the second one. That was just a cheap dig at their UX. Both were cheap digs, but also both true.
Full write-up here https://richardg867.wordpress.com/2020/02/29/usb-c-done-chea...
I left error handling out because it's an introductory post and the code would involve too many simultaneous concerns.
Are you honestly telling me that a package that was reviewed and signed off by three reputable developers is practically susceptible to "Scientific fraud"? If you do, then I can see why you think this problem is unsolvable.

You will never have a theoretically perfect solution to this problem, but guess what: turns out you don't have to. Even single-reviewer systems like linux repositories have proven to be vastly more secure than this crap.

This problem is absolutely solvable and eventually it will be. I just hope they solve it the right way.
Greg Egan's Permutation City is an all-time favourite. The combination of simulation, cellular automata, garden of eden states and Dust Theory blew my mind as an adult in the same way that the Matrix did when I was a kid. Very keen to check out this new work!
> If you smell shit all day look under your own shoe.

Ha I'm going to have to remember that one.

I used to get all steamed up about crap other drivers do on the road. Now, I generally just ignore it. I don't know why they might be in a hurry or what kind of day they've had, and it's not like I can actually do anything about it anyway.
The title is easily read as being about writing code to run in a PSX emulator or on modded hardware, rather than being about using Dreams for it's mostly-intended purpose. We use the terms PSX/PS2/etc. for a reason, and that alone would clarify the title quite a lot. Mentioning Dreams in the title would help, too.
Yes, it's a stack overflow. It's fixed by adding the appropriate flags to the underlying compiler.
I'm not talking about the administering of the vaccine but it's development.

Even that was a team effort and I doubt that people like Sabin count as that kind of crazy mentioned in the article.

Those are average scientists, not meant pejoratively, on the contrary, doing their job and sometimes the results have a big impact.
I agree with you completely. Not only is security a problem, but mixed-language packages too. It's possible to put something like that in PyPI but it it's a huge pain (and the new setup.py replacements make it basically impossible).
Would it work to make a requirements-pytorch.txt that doesn't look in PyPi?

--index-url https://user:pass@path/to/pytorch/nightly/repo
The difference is that if somebody or an institution earned their money fair and square, then they are entitled to give it to anyone they want. The problem is that the monetary system itself creates the inequality via artificial means (which falls on the shoulders of taxpayers and citizens via inflation) which means that big institutions did not earn much of the money that they're giving out; it was handed out to them through money printing. It's a systemic issue.
I know you hate you got caught out; I'll let it go this time. You can have the last word here if you like.
Some dishwasher tips from one month ago:

Gut epithelial barrier damage caused by dishwasher detergents and rinse aids

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33822149#33823456
> it is a union of common values and peace first and foremost.

this video explains (or interprets) quite succinctly the EU - it's a post-imperialism union. I really like that idea.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtymaSR3T48
The End of the Age of Sanctions?
You are correct, my friend
Your question itself assumes away quantum mechanics. There is fundamentally no fully certain particle in QM, the theory cannot meaningfully make predictions about something that's fully certain.

I've been out of school a while so might be wrong but maybe, just maybe, you could torture some mathematics into giving you some infinities if you really wanted to get a "prediction"?

But it's sort of like asking "how would linear algebra work if all nonzero matrices were invertible?" Well, all matrices aren't invertible, some definition of matrix that allows for nonzero matrices to be inverted is just different.
Thanks. Yes, I get the Fourier transform thing (and Bell's theorem etc.), but imagine asking Newton the consequences of finite-speed gravity. He could either imagine how to reconcile that with his theory and hypothesize what the outcome might be (e.g., he might say if the sun exploded then you'd find out 8 minutes later), or he could tell you it's intrinsically infinite and that your question is like asking "what the length of an oval" is. I find one of these answers more satisfactory than the other.

Now, in this particular case: I understand superdeterminism would mean the entire world could be deterministic and yet consistent with QM, correct? And I understand a reason why the world might be superdeterministic is that everything is already correlated/entangled together (say, from the big bang), thus making this in fact inherently a "measurement problem" in that we don't have any unentangled measurement particles available... right?

If you buy that so far, then here's where I'm trying to go with this: if QM's response to this is "well, if you did obtain such an unentangled particle, you could use it to reduce the uncertainty in your next measurement beyond your current limits", then it seems to me QM is in favor of the world being superdeterministic, and the uncertainty we face is more coincidental than fundamental. Whereas if QM's response was "well, even if you had such a particle, you couldn't use it to reduce the uncertainty in your next measurement", then it seems to me QM believes the measurement limit is more fundamental than coincidental. Given the situation seems like the former to me, is there any reason to bet against the world being superdeterministic? If anything, it seems to me that superdeterminism has the big bang going for it, no?
> Those same people exist in larger companies. The difference is they either fail up, or there are more people for them to spread their shit on.

Most larger companies do performance management, where the bottom x% lowest performers are laid off every year or every few years. In my experience working in small companies, performance management has been nonexistent or very timid. HR almost always puts roadblocks when firing people, except for egregious acts like sexual harassment or stealing, making it next to impossible to fire bad performers. Likewise, bad people (who are basically somewhat competent or not incompetent) still run amok regularly and are actually given relatively free rein because of nonexistent HR, weak HR, nonexistent management, weak management, or just plain nepotism (knows the VP or founder, for example) or all of the above.

Larger companies have many defenses against this sort of thing, and they actually work a lot of the time. Of course, there are large-group politics wherein huge groups (200-300+) battle against one another, in large companies. But those are of a different nature and are considerably less nasty.
Looking at the actual facts behind it, it seems likely yes. It starts to make a lot more sense once you research the facility that it occurred in, the Metropolitan Correctional Center. Frankly, I don't really get the whole conspiracy anyways.
i do not think an atheist perception of unity is about the same theme of a religious person. as far my empirical experience goes, atheists vary a lot how they felt it.
(mine for example was in a dark room with P. cubensis that i could only hear my heartbeat, then i accessed, in my perception, unity; which was a white slightly blue orb of energy [something that all organic life can access or have in it perception])
religious people most of the time believe in the same thing.
and considering the hypothetical (and not theoretical) state of explaining how life appeared or was formed, is at least curious that a vast majority of people interpret these questions the same way.

but as an atheist myself, you probably know my repulse towards a belief in a god, specially if it mimics or mirror itself in humans...

off topic: i am reading a book about elements on periodic table and the author mentions at some point about people observing that a mass extinction happens after 20 million years or so... and if we can prove it, it makes the existence of life way more interesting. as nowadays, i think the more we get closer to god, or a divine, unity thing, more i believe we should trust the scientific method, and go look for a sustainable way to get out of this solar system, secure, and maybe find some relatable life that maybe believe in something closer of what we have today: a god or entity that made this all possible

edit: i am drunk and it is new year eve... take it with a dose of compassion :P
Interestingly though GET with data exists in the wild, and has for many years.

I manage a http library class, and a customer encountered an API that required a GET but with data. (think query parameters passed as XML).

I implemented that for the customer, and then implemented the reverse in the server class. I'm not going to say its used a lot, but it makes semantic sense.

Incidentally it also becomes true for DELETE which is another request typically without a body.

This is the first I've heard of QUERY though, so look forward to reading up on that.
Why are we pussy footing around this? This affair has all the hallmarks of a state level blackmail operation run by CIA and Mossad. ("law enforcement" is a rather amusing label for spook agencies.)
Your uppance will come!
Also, a pretty sophisticated way to manage transitive dependencies. Python is an absolute mess in this regard (as well as pretty much everything else with dependency management…)
This reminds me of self-determination theory (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-determination_theory) which proposes that you need autonomy, competence and relatedness to a task to be motivated.

I could see how preparing your exact steps beforehand will ensure a feeling of competence.

This makes me wonder, maybe motivation could be improved even more by also including autonomy and relatedness in the preparing questions:

- Which steps can I take on my own, and which ones do I need help with?
- What makes this task meaningful to me? What positive effects will completing it bring?
> Personally, I'm very positive about IPv6. I find a lot to like in the protocol

Please expand on this (besides ‘wow such large numbers’…). I’ll take my answer off the air.
> This will never be as nice to use as a native app, because you cannot replicate all of the small details of how native UI works on each platform.

Not sure how much of that is necessary. I mean, a button doesn't "look native", so what? It's a button.

Apps written to require network requests to resolve a navigation are much worse than JavaScript handling a user event.

> And say you manage to get close to emulating a native app on one platform — when the OS UI updates, you’ll be behind again.

Not really the goal. You have this backwards. Keeping up with OS churn is one of the reasons to use an abstraction like this. It doesn't break your app nearly as much. The browser is a much more stable target than native mobile APIs.

> I get that it’s inconvenient/expensive for you to build three UI layer. But that’s the only way to do this well.

Inconvenient is dramatically understating the case. 3x spend is flat out impossible for many places.
Skiing in the alps faces a bleak future thanks to climate change
The "s" in homelab stands for security...
> language package management systems try to solve solve the problem that has been solved by Linux distributions a long time ago, and they typically do it very poorly.

Yet, every main Linux distribution has its own packaging format (deb, rpm, etc) , package naming convention, dependency resolver, package release strategy (rolling, fixed, etc) , package build & deployment system (source, binary, per arch binary, etc), and package install peculiarities (custom, upstream focused, system wide, in a chroot, in a snap, etc), reproducibility constraints, etc...

So it's not like it's a _solved_ problem for Linux distributions.

Not to mention that most distribution package managers are system wide, while language package managers are often environment based.
Peace is atrocities? and abhorrent?

I read Orwell's 1984 in high school, and I never believed that we'd go there until now.
One of the reasons why this happens is because Linux uses outdated security model. Linux protects one user's data from other user, but doesn't protect user's data from programs run by the user. This means that for example, third-party software like VSCode or Dropbox has permission to read your browser's cookies, history and saved passwords. Or it can debug your browser and read its memory.

Linux's security model would work well on multi-user mainframes in 80s but doesn't make much sense for an Internet-connected computer with a single user. The threats now are completely different.

For comparison, iOS and Android's security model would not allow a Python package to steal SSH keys. But the best solution would be to implement least privileges principle and do not grant unnecessary privileges to programs.

Another solution which could protect from such attacks would be to hire someone to inspect the packages. But it seems thatnobody is providing such services. Is it because people got used to everything being free?
You are correct:

>4. Sabatier reactor

>Inside this machine, a blast of roughly 750°F heat breaks the bonds inside CO₂, forcing it into its constituent elements. The carbon and oxygen combine with hydrogen from the station’s ­oxygen ­generating system to make H₂O and methane (CH₄), the latter of which vents into space.

https://www.popsci.com/how-iss-recycles-air-and-water/
How's Mossad involved? I'd think MI6 maybe.
> Borders are now settled once and for all.

Not for external ones...it'll be interesting to see what happens to Kaliningrad when Russia collapses later this year.
everybody here is aware of that ...
What I like about this construct is the fact that it uses the looser JSON semantics for the typically ad-hoc nature of recovering deleted entries - which does not necessitate the full power of referntial consistency.

What I'm not sure about is how will it will behave with blob fields and other data types with "problematic" serializations.