skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I wouldn't say we spent too long covering it, but having grown up near rayiner but a decade or so after from them, we covered it several times. It was the first unit of 6th and 11th grade US history, as well as 4th grade state history, and tangentially covered in 5th grade world history.
Not really related, but happy new year everyone: http://www.merzo.net/indexSD.html
I don’t think you can directly prevent it. Some BIOSs allow to preselect the video output, so you could set that to an unused output and switch the output later programmatically. It’s probably easier when you have both integrated graphics and separate a graphics card (between which you can switch). A simpler possibility may be to attach the monitor to a power strip with IP control, which you can switch off before the restart and switch on again after the restart.
I'm eager to come back to this comment in 2024 and reflect on whether the economic and technological forecasts were really as bad as people say they would be.
> The megalandords are potentially a serious threat to democracy.

everything in today’s america seems to be “a serious threat to democracy”.

as such it looks like american democracy is too fragile.
Effect of Ivermectin vs. Placebo on Covid-19 – A Randomized Clinical Trial
Personally, I think this is the great hiatus in moral philosophy, which is hard to bridge, maybe even impossible to mend. It's pretty much what divides the factions of Platonists and Aristotelians: is there a hierarchy to principles and virtues, and, if there's any, what is it? Like the divide over credo ut intelligam ("I believe so that I can understand/reason") or intelligo ut credam ("I reason so that I can believe") in the middle ages. (Abaelard's generally accepted formula of credo et intelligam was more an appeasement than a solution to this.) – Are there higher principles to keep those, which are really ancillary, in check? E.g., if we stick to the "virtues of aggregation" and an external origin of truth, is there a too much of individualism, of intellectual reasoning, which will inevitably spoil the only truth, which has come upon us as that most precious message, in what must end in utter heresy? Or, conversely, have we to keep in check any messages of faith and any claims arising from this by a critique of judgement, as this is our only anchor?

(The current discussion about woke and anti-woke is really pretty much the same it had been in 1100 AD. It's just that we seem to have forgotten the virtues and necessity of what may be called "Abaelard's great appeasement".)
Do you happen to know if this was built with accessibility in mind? There's no mention of it on the website as far as I'm able to tell.

Looking from the outside in, it is also unclear what relation the Petal framework has with the PETAL stack, I am confused by the name collision.
Surely you meant 2023?

Short answer for 2023 with very high certainty:

* More crypto regulations will be introduced with at least one exchange going down in 2023.

* Startups MUST now turn a healthy growing profit to qualify for further VC investment rather than from pure hype.

* OpenAI will gain further investment, ChatGPT by then will become a paid service with some startups fully sitting on top of the OpenAI API will also raise their prices or shut down.

Long answer for beyond 2023: [0]

Either way, OpenAI wins. Unless there is a open-source GPT4 or ChatGPT implementation that surpasses OpenAI's model.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21926473
Beware of Scam Steam Deck and Steam Account Stores
I’m having a hard time imagining how this would work in my real estate market, given that there are shacks less than a quarter mile from gated neighborhoods in vineyards… maybe this one works effectively in urban areas?
I take your point about origin myths and epistemology, but the original article makes repeated points about the First Peoples being left out of the debate.

So how would they be left IN? Would the archeological community say to them, respectfully, "Our evidence is that First Peoples arrived from Siberia somewhere between 20,000 - 10,000 BCE. What do you think?"

So what would their reaction be? Would it be:

1) We don't know; our myths don't go back that far; you tell US, or

2) You are a colonialist to even talk about this.

??
Scribepod – AI generated podcast on AI
Related Mastodon thread: https://mastodon.social/@gamingonlinux/109607849419464642
There are no examples in the past 40 or 50 years. The country is infested with illegal monopolies. At this point there really aren't any industries left that aren't completely dominated by 3 or 4 massive companies. This has even spread to industries which have been historically immune to monopolies for various reasons, such as local news, FM radio, primary care practicianers, hardware stores, textbook publishing, car/heavy equipment mechanics, etc.
I always thought his resignation was asked by the church because of his past. Maybe people knew more than we already know. Either way, a great academic but as usual in Germany, looked away for the bigger cause.
I see, so this is not related to work.
We call it that, but Jesus was born somewhere around 5 BC
If we assume "I'm looking forward to progress on this" is true and complete for the one stating it, then the actual alternatives are:

1. "How can I help" but it's a lie.

2. Silence.
Oh, those backward watches brings back memories. My dad used to have a big one in his bar, and as a prank tell customers looking at it that they're perhaps too drunk to get another drink.

He got me one when I moved out, and I've had it ever since. For some time it was actually hard for me to tell time looking at a normal analog clock.
I finally heard David Hasselhoff sing - he is pretty good! I’m surprised his singing career wasn’t bigger in the US. All we usually get is T&A + auto tune or suggestive lyrics + shock value, very few people with actual talent for singing.
That's a valid point, there is significant selection bias in different workplaces, locations, and institutions.

E.g.: I noticed variance comparable to yours going from a general public school in a poor neighbourhood to a university.
I mean, not really. All branches will need to hit the backend in order to verify that they were correctly predicted. RISC-V conditional branches, for example, require doing register register comparisons for verification which means they must be entered into the ROB and issued like any other instruction. This consumes real backend resources and is significantly more than a nop (which can be eliminated by the front end).
Happy New Year from the Dominican Republic. My New Year's resolution is to drink less frequently, exercise more and learn to surf. How about yours?
Townsend developed the 4 crop rotation system, not fertilizer.
There's a theory that the Younger Dryas was caused by an impact of a bolide on a North American glacier, usually of one that fragmented considerably on entry.
I'm sorry for your situation. Did you read the article?

This is not about buying existing homes. This is a joint venture to build new build-to-rent housing developments.

> The build-to-rent trend initially emerged during the Great Recession as a way for homebuilders to continue adding supply at a time when consumers were not buying homes. It refers to a process where developers construct an entire community of typically detached single-family homes that are later rented out by an operating partner.

In my opinion, this strategy and investment makes sense to large institutions like JPMorgan because interest rates are high while property values remain high. Building new rental housing increases overall supply, which is something that should, at least in theory, help people like you.
> A federal power without enough authority to resolve a lot of issues.

It's a work in progress. Rome wasn't built in a day. It was always going to be tricky when trading sovereignty and given the different cultures.

But more importantly it's headed in the right direction and it's a glorious project for actual EU citizens.
$400k and you're only just hassling customer service and HN?

I'm not particularly litigious, but I'd be suing by $40k, if only to get a resolution to satisfy my creditors.

What's crazier is you're still throwing money into this black hole! You claim imminent insolvency but haven't changed your payment processor. What?
Why study for a test that's not until next year?

Sorry, I'll see myself out.
Doesn't ISS generate oxygen from water and water is essentially shipped in? Either as water or as food. In the end methane is vented to space. I wouldn't call system needing pretty major inputs a self-sufficient one.
I think author can try to encode location of the emoji and incorporate better scoring function (GAN)? But that is obviously really "over-engineered" :)
The Younger Dryas Impact Event theory - there's some evidence that a disintegrating comet impacted North America ~ 12800 years ago and caused widespread forest fires and the equivalent of a nuclear winter.
Depends entirely in the property they use to create those units doesn't it? If they demolish 10,000 low end rental properties to build 1,000 high end properties, the answer seems obvious. Equally obvious, if they could create property out of thin air then more supply lowers prices, but property is finite.
There was already a 2023 thread today, and one earlier as well

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34196161

2033 prediction, I think there will be big changes in global order and we'll (the west) have (further) abandoned liberal democracy and be much close to what China is today

Possibly secession and flight to Texas and Florida, and western Canada
Is pointing out a conflict of interest a "personal attack"?
Thank you for the clarification, that seems to be the thrust in the article, that many people in recent years moved to short attention span type topics and comments ... I agree, even some non social media sites moved to removing any lengthy multifaceted answer or negative messages.

I'm not surprised when it comes to recent long interviews with the likes of Joe Rogan (anti vaccine sentiments) - echo chambers have completely different dynamics to every day discussions in non social media areas.

As for a trend towards more engaging content that's more thorough on the net, I have long suspected many people will slowly wake up that they need more, grow tired of social media's effort to sort of keep track of their life as well as yet another point of contract they can't easily ignore even if they are quite busy.

I look forwards to a move back to earlier net experience I used to enjoy, when an engaging discussion and subsequent comments could be a page long without a whiner complaining or simply posting tldr.
> I think Julia, D, Nim, and others show its possible and generally easy to work with open ended type systems.

Sorry, could you give an example of this? I can't find any way to extend existing types in those languages with some brief Googling.

> It matches with the decision to not allow user code to use trait specializations in stable despite the stdlib having it.

Keeping specialization unstable is much more a practical decision than a philosophical position: if they could, they would've stabilized it years ago. The problem is that specialization very quickly becomes unsound in combination with lifetimes. The compiler erases all lifetimes on types after checking them, since monomorphizing a new type for each lifetime would lead to an exponential explosion (this can't be changed at this point without redesigning the language). Therefore, users must not be able to specialize a trait impl on certain lifetime combinations (or certain lifetimes like 'static), since the compiler would have absolutely no way to tell which impl to use. And in turn, completely barring lifetime specialization becomes a daunting challenge with the existence of associated type projections and blanket impls. Specialization definitely isn't kept unstable just because they think users can't be trusted with it.

> Imports generally seem fine for controlling what gets used. Want a trait impl, import it into a module.

I don't think this would be compatible with blanket impls, since you couldn't just import every single potential impl in existence (and if you could, you'd run into conflicts). I suppose you could have a system of exporting impls, where to use a blanket impl you have to pass it another impl as input, but at that point you have new idiosyncratic system that would scare away users and would likely be far more noisy than a good newtype system.

> Unfortunately that means you can't define 'default' or 'clone' traits for a type. That prevents you from using derives on your newtypes as well. That means manually implementing clone, or serde which is a PITA.

If a foreign crate doesn't implement Default or Clone for its types, then how is the compiler supposed to derive it for your local newtypes? It can't just look into the foreign type's fields, if they aren't all public. Are you often having to work with fully public foreign types?

Overall, I get that the type system can be pretty frustrating as it stands today, but I don't see any better alternative than building better tools for defining newtypes.
I’m doing an annual play through of ocarina of time right now so magic beans mean something a bit different… munch munch…!
The null hypothesis is that animals, including humans, moved where they could, when they could, regardless of any inconvenience for theorists of recent prehistory.

All we can know about the prehistory of present populations from genetics is their direct ancestry. Who was in the Americas before those ancestors, but did not breed with them, is lost to us until we find actual remains.

Pretending to know there weren't any is a mistake made over and over again, yet never learned from.
Amazon stock is down and you can't have that. I bet they are cutting corners with labor or elsewhere.
I'll save you a read.

The conclusion was mild to moderate covid patients didn't fair any better with 600μg/kg/day of ivermectin vs placebo in terms of recovery.

I was always curious why researchers didn't pay much attention to the combination of ivermectin + zinc + early outpatient administration.
HTTP is an unmitigated mess. It's in the same state as C++; tries to be everything but has lots of historical baggage that can't/won't be removed.
Nothing of what you're saying has any bearing on the term sovereignty, which was your original point.

Sovereignty is a legal-political concept, and it has nothing to do with economic tradeoffs or benefits. Adopting the euro obviously has both potential benefits and potential drawbacks, and choosing to adopt it is rationally expecting that the benefits outweight the drawbacks.

But that's just purely a matter of pragmatic decision-making. It does not affect Croatia's legal sovereignty.
No wars.
No pain.
No humiliations.
No poverty.
No fear.
I’ve been using it consistently for several weeks now after initially assuming I never would. While I am blown away by how accurate it often is at knowing exactly what I’m thinking, I personally find for languages and frameworks I know we’ll I get at most a 10% productivity boost. When I’m dipping my toe into a new language or framework though it probably goes up to 50%. Still I am in awe by how much it seems to understand and if nothing else I like having my jaw drop every once in a while by it’s understanding
France, football, colonialism: Take the best, leave the rest
Same to 1 and 2. For 3, learning to ski rather than surf due to my location :)
I've been wondering about this recently. Modern branch predictors are really good at predicting correlated conditional branches. That is, if you have two if statements near each other that use the same condition, modern branch predictors have a very good chance of learning to predict the second one perfectly based on what the first one did.

Is the same true for indirect calls, i.e. virtual function calls? That could be quite the powerful optimization, but it's probably really hard to do.
France was still doing internal border controls at airports "temporarily for 6 months due to exception circumstances" but renews them repeatedly so it's not really temporary.

A big waste of time when they do this in Toulouse on a flight from Brussels when you could drive to France faster without a border control.

Most of EU has legally done this, but actual application is more patchy:

https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/schengen-borders-...
Happy new year, may it be different than 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022.
Some months ago after recoiling in horror from a vulnerability in rust I arrived at the grim realization that the "supply chain attack" problem is intractable in impure languages. When a transitive dependency can do anything it will inevitably do something. I don't expect to convert everyone (or anyone) to object capabilities and purity, but I do hope the experiences of the past year have put the fear of God into developers. We should aspire to build systems where a suddenly malicious or busted dependency can't knock over the whole tower.
Love this. Thanks for engaging, and Happy New Year!
It sounds like they're dipping their feet in the water. If the risk/reward calculation is favorable compared to other assets they'll increase their investment.
I did Advent of Code on a Playstation
Do you understand what the 4 crop rotation system is? The key thing is what he did with animals on the fields that were fallow. He brought in animals and had them poop on the fields that were fallow, so in future years they'd be more productive. The poop is a key part of the 4 crop rotation system.
Op is juggling cash to make payroll. Crushing insolvency can be far more expensive than lawyers.
God bless them. How can we help to stop crime like this?
I had a longer and more comprehensive response, but it was also kind of mean, and I generally don't want to indulge the bad habit of political flame wars with random strangers on the internet. It's a habit I'd like to stow away for good in 2023.

One thing I do want to note though is that you somehow assume that I am not taking into consideration Trump's policies.

A) I have (in fact, I worked on litigation against some of them). I don't know why you think I haven't. You also seem to assume that if someone were to examine his foreign policy, they would also view some of it as good. Why? I am aware generally of his foreign policy, and I saw little, if anything, to like. Not everyone shares your worldview.

B) The big thing I think people of your persuasion miss is morality. I don't think his policies matter that much given the fact that I view him and his supporters* as deeply immoral and fucked up on multiple levels. I feel you will simply never understand this, and thus all of your entreaties and arguments, such as the ones above, will always miss the mark. I believe that you don't understand what the people you are debating think or believe, or why they think and believe it.

Also, I don't get your thing about the federal debt--there are plenty of people with federal student loans, myself included.

* When I say his "supporters" in this context, I really single out people who particularly like Trump and/or the "new right" more than they like traditional Republicans, conservative ideas. I obviously still have great beef with the Republicans who just went along with him, but I would say my ire is a bit tempered there. I'm still ok sharing a country with them, at least, let's put it that way.
> The EU should do what serves its interests best and that is not as hard a stance on China as the US would like.

This might be unpopular, but I think you are right. The EU must not be too aligned with the US, lest it gets dragged in the next Iraq. And, to be fair, it is valuable for the US to have an external point of view they can still more or less trust, but that can still be critical. You need friends to tell you when you’re doing a stupid mistake. At the same time, the interests of the US and the EU converge very often and unfriendly relations would be counter-productive.

It’s also useful to be able to play good cop/bad cop, with one partner being more accommodating like during the negotiations of the Iran nuclear deal (which failed in the end for unrelated reasons, but I believe we would have avoided a lot of grief regarding drones in Ukraine if we’d have kept the Iranian government on board).
How does this work in practice? If a border guard accosts you for overstaying in Schengen and you tell them “I was spending time in Andorra”, what then? Can they not demand proof?
Depended on the bank. Quite a few in Euros, some in other currencies, even USD. But if you wanted your mortgage in Zloty then suddenly the interest was twice as high.
Sorry, but the fairphone doesn't even provide anything close to the feel and quality of a phone by a known manufacturer.

I would argue would get a better experience by just buying a Pixel 7 for a cheaper price, or 7 Pro for a bit more.
It's like when I watch sped up digital painting videos on YouTube, every time I think "this is perfect" the artist continues and redefines what "perfect" means.
I spent the last 6 years building an Ionic app for “enterprise”. The still-not-native UX is the main reason why it’s not more popular, in my opinion.

In our case, our users had little say in their respective organizations’ decisions to buy our product, and “good enough” was still better than what our competitors were offering anyway.

We spent a lot of time of time debugging native layer issues, and WebGL bugs that would crash the webview (vector maps using the ArcGIS JS SDK) so it’s not a magic bullet in those respects either.
> a country can easily adopt USD

Well yes and no. They have to get their hands on enough USD to replace their own currency, and even more if their economy expands.
It wasn't one gentleman but the result of multiple people.

Solutions are seldom the result of one lonely working geniuses.

For instance the internet or FB changed the world, but I wouldn't categorize their inventors as those crazy ones mentioned in the article.

We just tend to attribute special features to the most well known people, higher endurance, greater skill, stronger will.

There are way to many inventions and companies to thinks the world is formed by a few 'crazy' ones.

The only crazy one who achieved that are the real crazy ones and they didn't change the world to the better, see Putin.
"God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference."

— Reinhold Niebuhr, the Serenity Prayer
Crypto is like giving your banknotes to a guy who then gives you a digital receipt which only you can access and sometimes even you cannot, the receipt value fluctuates and can be traded for other receipts or transferred to an exchange of unknown jurisdiction where it might be swappable for your banknotes again.
It not only is packaged by a third party but also uses a community-written patch[1] to replace Chrome's built-in sandbox with Flatpak's own sandbox. It's unclear to me whether Chromium upstream has vetted or is even aware of this modification.

[1] https://github.com/refi64/zypak
by being so misleading.

The commenter publicly identifies themselves in their HN profile and you're using that to attack them. It's completely backwards to say they've misrepresented anything. The essential thing is to assume good faith and not go on weird innuendo-laden witch-hunts.
UN seeks ICJ opinion on Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine
One implementation detail about QUIC that I was surprised by was that it requires TLS. That’s great for improving the security on the public Internet but it seems like it adds complexity and CPU overhead if you’re running on something like an internal Wireguard network. Overall, though, it’s a minor complaint. I did like how they split apart the QUIC and HTTP/3 protocol from one another.