skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The incident has causeda stir in the community

I wonder if ChatGPT included a typo because virtually every small town news article has one.
It still requires a prescription and, therefore, a doctor moderates usage and safety.
Is Binance the Next Domino to Fall?
Thanks. Just a fraction published as I try to motivate/document/clean up before doing so. I kind of live at the Zsh prompt and tend to fill gaps as I find them & iterate on that.

Also, if you think of an idea for more, please feel free to raise an issue - maybe it's already done somewhere. Or even better, use it as an excuse to learn Nim and file a PR or even better do your own repo. :)
> In a shocking turn of events, a leaf has fallen from a tree in a local park.

First thought: sounds like the Onion!
This kind of heavy-handed approach feels like the kind of thing I'd do if I read HN religiously and took everything as gospel. There are few things more reviled in these realms than meetings and MBAs.
The United States is short O(10M) housing units[0], primarily due to anti-construction policies. Airbnb has O(100k) listings[1] in the US. Banning short-term rentals is a 1% solution. That's a policy distraction, not a useful lever to pull.

[0] https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/11/us-housing...

[1] https://www.stratosjets.com/blog/airbnb-statistics/
In Germany, there are two competing flight comparison engines with very similar names: fluege.de and flüge.de.

How would you send an email to the customer support of flüge.de? How would you parse that domain?

IDN is here, and it's here to stay.
Bypassing the block renders the authoritarian control measures ineffective and/or void. This is an act of resistance in itself. Why do you think bypassing the ban is conforming to authority?
I agree. People have differences in satisfaction based on the type of work they're attracted to.

Personally, I love working with my hands. But I want a job that pays very well and offers location flexibility. (Plus I love learning an entire system of skills which builds upon itself) So, I chose IT.

But I still plan to do construction projects-- a Maker Space near me offers evening courses in welding, electrician skills, and carpentry.

I think the unfortunately reality is also that:

- There are differences in effort

- There are differences in intelligence

- There are differences in industriousness (how proactive a person is)

Which leads to some people being more suited towards intellectually challenging work. Others are more suited or interested in less mind-oriented work. Which is totally ok-- there is a huge demand for both.

So, I Agree-- Not everyone is better off in Tech.
Why doesn't your cousin want their daughter to be a plumber?
how is it better than vim, or vscode, or clion to qualify itself as 10x?
I never knew that, absolutely hilarious. I find that internet forums are just terrible all around. Moderating is an extremely important but thankless and unpaid job. So (with rare exception) the only people that do it are completely irrational and inept power hungry people with too much time on their hands. In the case of HN the reason moderation is so good is because Dang is actually paid from what I understand. But even on HN the mouth breathers learn the ins and outs of the system and know how to abuse flagging among other things.
It's not as though this is some thousand-year-old fence; psychadelics were illegalized under Nixon. If there was a reason other than 'they are drugs', it has not been made public, and all research at the time suggested that they should not have been illegalized. I'm open to being told I'm wrong, but 3 pages of google results did not push me in that direction.
in what jurisdiction would you file that police report? if you are not in the same town as their offices, where are the local police going to go to "investigate"?

this is clearly a matter across state lines, so it's an FBI issue. at least get your LEA correct when making non-sense posts like this. it's the least you could do. I don't even know if FBI is the correct agency either though, so there's that bit of info from some rando on the interwebs
Twitter isn't banned in India despite having that kind of content.
I believe (and that's hardly an original observation) that some of the problems in the US trades based professions stem from their lack of non-academic credentials systems.

In e.g. Germany or Switzerland, your pot smoking drill press operator could point to a four year apprenticeship, and possibly even advanced specializations beyond that, with hundreds of recognized professional tracks. In the US, professional skills seem to be acquired somewhat more randomly, and consequently, are less portable.
It's not quite as bad as it looks. In addition to having a lot more retirees, a lot more adults pursue higher education and performing homemaking duties.
Right, I understand why you'd want to project at the very end of the query, i.e. suppress some columns from being shown. Other than that, I don't see the point, unless there's a performance impact. Keeping columns around doesn't actually change the result of the query in any way.
This looks nice, finally a good attempt at a java Swift UI, will try it out.
Sorry for all the links, but I've been struggling with these EXACT same things my entire life, and recently spent a lot of time writing about it.

> * I tend to leave things to the last minute. Most of the time it usually goes very well, unless I've heavely understimated the task which happens 1/10 times. Most of the things I need to do are important but not urgent, so they require to be proactive

Rather than trying to force yourself to be proactive, I found success by eliminating all my sources of distraction. After my wife put a passcode on my phone for using HackerNews and Reddit and YouTube, I magically found myself avoiding work less!

https://taylor.town/parental-self-controls

> * I get bored or distracted easily, I don't belive in ADHD, but according to the definition I definetly have it. So thats why I sometimes prefer tinker with a RPi on a project that has my interest instead of the ticket I know I can finish by just focusing 15min.

I recommend keeping a /now page with your personal "sprints" in the future. For me, what causes tinkering rabbit-holes is twofold:

- being afraid of not every getting back around to THE REALLY COOL IDEA

- not being realistic about how long the rabbit-hole will take compared to the rest of your wish-list

https://taylor.town/now

> * As typical in procrastinators, I tend to ignore big tasks because they seem difficult or tedious, but when you start doing them most of the time I get into the flow in about 15mins into the task making me wonder why did I took so long to start the task.

A lot of my procrastination comes from imagining that a task won't fit in an allotted block of time. I've made a personal mantra of "scrounging for between time".

https://taylor.town/between-time

> * Also, you may relate to this, I have 2000 videos on my youtube watch later playlist and lost count on my "To read" bookmark on Chrome.

Those lists will haunt you until you decide it's fake and unimportant!

https://taylor.town/nothing-fulfills
The backdoor was built from the beginning. She is a fraudster all along. Can the press stop trying to make them look innocent?
Building Ragdolls
> IIRC, if one pedantically types a typical NxM transformation matrix, one may need NM different explicit types.

In a dependently typed language like Idris?

Most likely even Java's generics would solve this issue.
Even if something like food service at McDonald's is automated, it's tough to argue that we should be getting humans to work on things that can be automated.

Imagine working 40 hours a week then seeing that the machine both prepared more product and made fewer mistakes than you, or feeling like you're doing work just because someone (the government) pities you enough to force some jobs to remain non-automated.

Working with more complex, higher-skilled work that makes you feel like you're improving the lives of others is what our brains crave, not repeating menial tasks over and over again.
no one is going to force you to take psychedelics. I understand and support skepticism, but I have yet to hear a cogent argument backed by evidence for why these substances should be so harshly criminalize. The overwhelming consensus among experts is that these drugs are at the very least much safer than alcohol and many prescription drugs like adderall
I wonder if we'll see this in the US as the midwest food infrastructure starts to require replacements as the older generation dies off.

Younger generations, even in the midwest, are gravitating to office work as opposed to the farms (there aren't a lot of tech companies compared to the coasts, but there are enough).
> Not sure what list you’re referring to, but I would expect to find Python and Scala in it, maybe OCaml or Haskell depending on the criteria.

Surely neither OCaml nor Haskell are in the top 20 of any "Most Used Programming Languages" list.
They are all private forums/Facebook groups for various YouTube analytics tools or production/business courses. So you would have to spend money to get access to them.
That’s quite common functionality nowadays but generally if you’re dealing with valuable enterprise relationships that would benefit from tickets ranking higher, you have points of contact available to the client (whether that’s an account manager or similar) outside of impersonal tickets.

I’m sure if you’re a valuable enough stripe client, they’ll have account managers. The problem for Stripe is that we see big numbers ($400k) and they see small numbers ($4k) so our perception of which clients are worth dedicating resources to is unrealistic.

Stripe could do a better job here but I’d be shocked if any big valuable clients have an experience like this, because if someone is driving $100k/year of revenue for Stripe, they’ll be able to get someone on the phone who knows their name and business.
One thing that I have found to help some is to spend a minute daydreaming about having successfully completed the task at hand. It increases my motivation to start some. Once started, I find that it's actually a little easier to continue than it is to stop. No magic bullets I'm afraid. Just a small, but sometimes, useful boost.
I had a very similar experience with TripAdvisor and a hotel in Vietnam, which claimed my review was false. The really crazy part of this was that my review was positive, 4/5 stars. But they wanted 5 stars and "befriended" me on Instagram to ensure I did that. Even with all this proved and screenshotted, TripAdvisor didn't do much until I went public on social media (thread: https://twitter.com/puntofisso/status/955726203662536704) and some highly visible users piled in.

I can't trust any reviews after this. The major issue is that the review system is flawed. One odd bad review should not affect the overall standing of a business, so even assuming a review was flawed they should leave it on; if they don't, it means that the whole review framework is wrong somehow because statistically gives power where it shouldn't.
Sprints are also detrimental to “soft values” in my experience:

* Engineers rushing to wrap up for the sprint (stress and decreased quality is bad for morale)

* Engineers getting monitored and measured on a task level since all tasks need to be estimated (micromanagement, lack of trust)

* Agility is decreased since everything needs to be planned (lack of autonomy)

Sprints tend to become “phony deadlines”, a key component in “Teamicide” (from “Peopleware”).

I’ve been trying to come up with benefits but I’m coming up short. Wish someone could tell me!
I’m sure even an amateur without access to any secret data could do this for a large chunk of users already. I’m guilty of re-using online handles and some times associating it with a public email and so on. Once that leads to my social media accounts, there is very little left to find. I think most users practice this non-existent opsec.
It seems that there is no unique selling proposition. Practically any editor can do this for any language. Also there are many free editors, that fulfil the requirements.
This is a weird gate-keeping response.
I get what the author of this website is trying to say, but is there a need to swear that much? What is the purpose of that?

Ps: You actually lost me at the "Fuck Twitter" part. It actually has been better for me since Elon took over and Mastodon has never convinced me with its hallmarks of the old Twitter.
I prefer Hg over Git but I use Git. Why? One time I tried to use hg command and it didn't work. Why? I was on a system that had incompatible Python interpreter to the Hg scripts.

That was it. Since then I use Git everywhere even though I prefer Hg.
> nor do I believe is it an example of totalitarianism

These conversations never go anywhere. The battlelines are already drawn. It just becomes a semantic debate around loosely defined terms like totalitarianism.
Yes, and don't mind paying for these.

But I also want the software I buy to keep working as well as they did the day I bought them. I don't expect the developer to fix all bugs forever without any additional payment, even less add features, but I'd rather not have a kill switch, which for a text editor is what subscriptions are.

Many software vendors (ex: Jetbrains) offer renewable permanent licences that pays for maintenance without the kill switch. Sublime Text, which is possibly 10x most direct competitor now has a permanent license with 3 years of updates, which can be considered a subscription (you have to pay every 3 years for updates), but if you stop, your software won't break.
I was just about to ask the same question. Is this a formatting error by ChatGPT or afterwards on the website?

In the former, it is interesting that typos are part of ChatGPTs vocabulary in some form. And is used correctly.
Had to address this for one of my clients last week. We decided to go with Google Tag Manager and Google analytics 4. The deciding factor was familiarity.
Sorry but this is false, you have this entirely backwards.

> Trans-exclusionary feminists are reactionaries attempting to prop up existing gender roles and stick people back into their assigned places.

Absolutely not. One of the core tenets of gender critical feminism is that the imposition of gender roles is harmful, particularly as they are used to oppress and disadvantage women and girls.

> They often subscribe to old school feminist beliefs where we still have a masculine/feminine gender divide but they want to focus on the value of the feminine.

No, they recognise the male-female divide, and how this is the basis of oppression of women and girls.

Consider which of the two sexes that FGM, forced marriage, child brides, sex-selective abortions, denial of education to girls in poorer countries, trafficking of girls and women into sexual slavery, etc. is imposed upon. Not the males, that's for sure.

> The common refrain is a feigned concern for those who transgress against gender roles while at the same time doing everything they can to enforce them.

Gender critical feminists have no problem with transgression of gender roles. Their feminism is fundamentally about rejecting these roles. They believe that there's no right way to be a woman or a girl in terms of presentation or behaviour or belief; being female is the only criterion.

I mean, go to any radfem meetup and you'll see so many women there who don't conform to gender roles and gender stereotypes.

The key issue that brings this feminism into conflict with transgender ideology is the claim of "transwomen are women", and the downstream effects of this claim: males demanding access to female-only spaces on the basis that they are women. Gender critical feminists naturally reject this, because to be a woman or girl is not a state of identity, or how well someone performs femininity, but is the material existence of being female.

Fundamentally, gender critical feminism is not about transgenderism, it is about sex. In particular, about being female, and what that means socially, politically, economically and legally, in societies and cultures emerging from histories of male dominance.
Nice, although I would suggest just "The Super Tiny Compiler".
I'm not of nor do I represent "the linux community", I'm a multi-os user with no explicit favourite. I called you a troll because your posts read like deliberate trolling to me.

Good luck to you, I'll not engage further.
It's annoying and unnecessary, even as someone who isn't an utter back-the-blue person myself. Your point would have been perfectly conveyed without shoving "pigs(ACAB)" in there.

Kind of for the same reason that vegans making it a point to tell you they're vegan, despite nobody asking, is quite obnoxious.

It only serves to discredit your point.
I don't know a single man that uses or embraces that term. It seems to be used exclusively by arm chair psychiatrists or terminally online twitter people.
It means that you're supposed to be equally comfortable with VLSI design as you are with Photoshop and everything in between.
No need for the silly reductionist snark there, friend. They were also given 12 psychotherapy sessions during the 8mo study.
Oroville was actually rebuilt and held up nicely in recent atmospheric rivers. Same with the South Bay dams that caused the San Jose flooding in 2017. I wouldn't use those as examples - if anything, they are examples of how California actually can build infrastructure, quickly and reliably, when there is profound media embarrassment and multi-million-dollar lawsuits at stake.

The infrastructure you have to worry about is the stuff that everybody's forgotten about, eg. the levee and dam systems in the Delta.
> Anything on that short a timescale would have negative effects on the existing population or their immediate descendants, which still falls under looking after the wishes of those who exist. ... the parents of those children exist now, and they don't want those outcomes.

I don't understand your pivot here to include anything that current people prefer. If you're comfortable with work to support the wishes of those who exist, what about the large number of people who want humanity to continue flourishing well after they're dead?

Trying to narrow down the hypothetical, I think your asteroid suggestion is a good one. If on 1950-01-01 we had discovered a huge asteroid on course to collide with Earth on 2100-01-01, "let's ignore this until the people who are going to be alive on that day have been born" would have been a (rightly!) unpopular decision.
An unemployed (not by choice), frustrated guy can't be fun to be married to. I could see it causing problems in the relationship.

Lo and behold, in the paper they say this too:

"It is possible that husbands’ less than full-time employment is associated with marital disruption more strongly than wives’, not because of gendered interpretations of lack of full-time employment, but because husbands’ part-time employment or nonemployment is more likely to be involuntary. Involuntary nonemployment may negatively affect marriages more strongly than voluntary nonemployment, by affecting outcomes like partners’ mental health. It is not possible to evaluate this perspective with the current data, because voluntary specialization by men in unpaid labor is rare: in 2012, only about one-fifth of stay-at-home fathers were home primarily to care for the family (Livingston 2014). Future research is needed to explore the experiences of deliberately nontraditional households, although their rarity illustrates the consistency of the male-breadwinner norm."
Groovy, Spark, Flink, Wayang and Data Science
Why is this terrifying? The prompt gave it the scenario and every detail; ChatGPT did exactly what it was told. If anything, this is less creative than the leaf example.
You'd be surprised, I myself know several and I have no interest in the hobby to be adjacent to their circles. Anecdotally it seems like MLP all over again, but even more skewed to the adult demographic, which does make a lot more sense to me than MLP at least.
Great point. I didn't think of that, but it's so true.

Felony records, Health problems, etc. prevebting people from working.
The way it usually works, if 1 of your 100 modules needs to be scaled, it probably means the overall monolith only needs a small amount of extra resources, since that module is only using 1% of the total. So it's not like you need to double the instances of the whole thing.

The benefit though is you get a bit of 'free' scaling. Most of the modules don't even have to consider scaling at all, as long as they are growing ~average or slower. So this saves a lot of operational burden for many teams. Conversely with microservices every team has to consider scaling, no matter how simple their service is.

(If you do have 1 module out of 100 that takes up 40% of the resources, then it may be appropriate to split it up. Monolith doesn't literally mean "exactly one service", after all, just a small number of big ones.)
honestly, what is wrong with you?
Could S-modafinil be the new caffeine?
Just wait until you decide you need some kind of distributed transaction support across multiple microservices… You should aim to spend a considerable amount of time in the design and discovery phases.
> as far as I know, there's no way to granularly scale up a monolith. if the monolith has 20 or 50 or 100 modules and you need 1 or 2 of them scaled, you have to scale up the entire thing which is huge, expensive, etc.

not necessarily. yes, you do pay for executable bloat and some memory overhead from loading code into memory, but the argument here is that you can still deploy a "Service B" from the same deployable that only services certain kinds of requests in order to scale parts of the application horizontally.

> this is interesting. a monolith with some form of IPC? why not do microservices at that point? that sounds like microservices-ish?

no, because again, you're still deploying the same single codebase, it's just the instance on the other end of the queue is configured just to consume and process messages.
But people were gambling and making bad financial decisions before the 2008 crisis too.

The crypto schemes are very often rehashing of old scams and mistakes, they are not qualitatively different from penny stocks pump and dumps, pyramids and MLM schemes, ponzi schemes, tulip/cabbage patch/whatever mania, etc.
I'd be ok with this if it were a tradeoff that I was choosing to make. Stripe withholding $400k can end a business. Google locking me out of my account can upend my life. I'd like to be able to pay the premium required to ensure that if an algorithm flags my account, I'm not going to be spending days banging my head against a wall trying to talk to a person who can straighten it out.
I do most of my browsing from "datacenter IPs", because I segment browser instances (including source IP) by activity type, and I only get one IP from my physical upstream. It's also very easy to rotate datacenter IPs frequently, and they don't spill my physical location.

I spend real money browsing from these rotating datacenter IPs, to many different online stores, and I've only run into a rare few that won't let me. If a website doesn't work, especially for the casual browsing of shopping, then that will very much influence my purchasing decisions.

If your website relies on surveillance to make money, meaning you don't particularly appreciate my efforts to stop the abuse of my privacy, then I understand how we're at an impasse. But if you're running an honest business and think that heavy handed blocking is only pushing away illegitimate traffic, please do reconsider.
Lol.

> How many of those are human?

Many more than the ones that are on Mastodon.