skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Good for you but you're such a vanishingly small part of the population that it won't stop anyone in sales and marketing from continuing to follow up on people (which, by the way, is not illegal). You effectively don't matter.

And good follow up software will also stop once a reply has been sent from the recipient, which is then forwarded to a salesperson to triage.
Used to be true. WSJ wears that crown now.
My personal philosophy includes a strong vein of deep ecology, with a political view influenced by mutualist anarchism. I wanted to be part of a humanity which got its act together, tore down its oppressive hierarchies, adapted to its limits, and learned to respect not only each other, but the whole of the ecosystem we live within. That can no longer happen; we've already gone so far (with CO2 emissions especially) that everything, everywhere, has been or will be disrupted and damaged by human industry.
Sadly, I don't share your optimism. If the current state of JS isn't proof enough that it is doomed to be forever reinventing itself I don't know what is. Layer upon layer is a recipe for disaster which soon becomes apparent with these new toys once you require more than "Hello Word". I'd rather be saddled with Spring Boot than have to wade through the quagmire of current JS frameworks.
fails with older browsers

Uncaught TypeError: t is null
lol I knew that analogy was going to lead nowhere good.

But the point still stands :)
A great success for the idea that your BTC is a store of value not dependent on traditional financial infrastructure - now it takes the a whole morning and cooperation of 3 banks for you to get at your money.
You'd have to scale the resolution on these waayyy down to not see the usual janky, smudgy, sometimes nightmare-inducing details.

I seriously have never understood why what gets published in these blog posts isn't just lower res especially since this is precisely about old video game graphics.
Yes, and stealing bread and sleeping under bridges is illegal for both the rich and the poor. It's completely fair.
I am not trained at all in sales. Can you expand upon this?
He didn't even do that. He used text descriptions; the original pixel art wasn't involved.
Yeah, look up textual inversion
> Aggregates are too heavy. You need to make the decision about what is or is not an aggregate way too early in the design process. Boundaries are fuzzy.

I've had the exact same complaint. I think there's a lot of great stuff to take away from DDD -- I also hear myself frequently making the same point about it's ubiquitous language -- but going all-in on some of its concepts, especially early in a projects life, is probably always a mistake that may well end in disaster.
Can you rethink your revenue model? Selling ads that'll be played to kids is pretty grim.
I believe Rust had some form of contract enforcement in its early days, but they eventually removed it because it had too many problems. I wish I could find the post about it, but Google is useless these days.
Where was this posted? Can you post a link?

edit:

if you're talking about https://twitter.com/LukeDashjr/status/1609661811455819776, my guess is that he's either omitting something (eg. the cold wallet was internet connected, or there was a backup of its wallet floating around somewhere), or suffered a stuxnet level attack.
Sure. You shouldn't care about the opinion of anyone who cares what car you drive, because they are, as made clear by that opinion, entirely superficial thinkers.
There are some people who will misunderstand or forget the topic of the conversation and pack their sentences with tangenial, unncessary information.

The other person in the conversation must interrupt or ignore that, or there's risk that the time spent talking will be wasted on the tangent.

Sometimes what appears to be a tangent is actually an introduction to a previously unseen but crucial aspect, but that needs up front connection in order to hold the listener's attention.

Of course, this all only matters when the conversation has a specific goal.
What I'd love is software that starts with a scan and then calculates a confidence level for all the vertices, which it would then let you edit with exact measurements or even intelligent questions like "is this part circular?"
> Calling something that a person *says or writes* "asinine" is inflammatory

Yes, inflammatory. But personal, no.

> If I were to call your defense of it "naive, brain dead and utterly absurd" are you sure you wouldn't interpret that as a personal attack?

Correct, because it's not personal. That would be attacking the quality of the argument, not me, although it would certainly be inflammatory. I certainly wouldn't take it well — but for a totally different reason than you originally specified.

"Personal" and "inflammatory" are two different things.
And likely beat the crap out of your undercarriage.
I don't get how one can get realistic modeling of eclipses without taking into account the eccentricity of Earth's orbit around the Sun (it not only minorly affects the distance, but more imporantly it causes the angular speed of Earth around the Sun to vary).

Am I overestimating the impact of that error, missing a description of how it was accounted for, or something else?
I have a ton of fun using the "say" program on MacOS to write toy programs with my kids, have often wanted a version that could run on my eldest's Manjaro laptop. Are any of the above analogously simple to use?
Been around the internet for a very very long time :)

And sure, people absolutely cared. That’s why AIM profiles were a thing, and why people were so excited when they could build web pages easily with Frontpage or Dreamweaver or with Angelfire or Geocities, etc.

What’s changed is arguably that it is less acceptable to be anonymous now, but the concept of wanting to share and be seen is not new.
As of 2021 the IRS asks about cryptocurrency assets, so anyone who screws this up and lies to the IRS is already under threat of perjury.
That's also true. To be honest, I don't know what the midpoint should be. For Shakespeare, we watched movie adaptations which made a lot more sense than just reading a somewhat dry play.
AI Hardware Will Be Everywhere (For a Fee)
Using AI to design and test games, tune difficulty, find world geometry flaws
If you were teleported back to the year 0 and went to what is now the US and encountered a large ethnically homogeneous tribe, what exactly would that smoke signal to you?

(Editing: as far as "ascribing what you think", the only things I've ascribed to what you think that you think that ethnic homogeneity in post-European white population is morally improper, which is exceedingly clear from the phrasing of the first comment you posted when you called it a "problem", and that you believe your community was racist, which is clear from the second comment you posted.)
Care to share what your dreams are? No worries if not.
Probably most rules that we have are there to prevent us (admittedly this applies mostly to men) from killing each other.

That's why "rules are just constructs we humans created" rings stupid/horrifying. Obviously they were created by humans but that is also why they matter. I prefer "rules were written by humans, mostly in blood". It took years for OP to get the first part, here's to them getting the second part faster.

One doing something wrong to another would get families into an infinite loop of mutual revenge--until we got around precisely to create rules and put up a trusted authority to ensure justice without the need for vengeance. Rules is how our civilization functions and its only hope.
> Almost no other engineering discipline is volatile like that. So why should SE be?

Because it can afford to be like that.

You seem to be treating volatility as something negative. But it's only a side effect of software engineering industries being incredibly cheap to launch and scale.

You can't start a transnational construction company in a garage. But you can start Google.
In the twitter thread the OP links to.

https://twitter.com/LukeDashjr/status/1609683917644120067

You can easily browse through his recent tweets here https://twitter.com/LukeDashjr/with_replies
Right, which is what the rest of my comment is about.
My email is always open to any hacker news members with sailing ambitions.
There's a reason why "circuit as a city" used to be a common visual metaphor in pop culture when computers came up. E.g. this scene from the Hackers:

https://youtu.be/IESEcsjDcmM?t=135
> The NYTimes is America’s preeminent newspaper,

But does that mean anything? Newspapers (as a class) aren’t where people get news anymore.

Also, by what measure?

By this trust rating: https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/articles-reports/20...

the Times is below the Wall Street Journal, the WaPo, and the Guardian, and barely above USA Today.
Absolutely, get a G-Shock. But get one which radiosyncs. Most phones (and PCs), although synced by internet, reliably lag between one and two seconds.

My synced G-Shock is always correct to within better than one tenth of a second, that is, to the limit of observability. Solar powered, too, so it's just an utterly reliable black box. My favourite gadget by far.
While I don't think it's grim to show ads to kids, particularly for relevant products, yes, I can and will rethink the revenue model.
> No schengen does not provide work visa.

Indeed, Schengen is completely unrelated to work visas, it simply removes border control within the area.

Freedom of movement rights come from the EEA Single Market (EU + Iceland, Lichensteain, and Norway) plus Switzerland (through a complex series of ad-hoc agreements with the EU.) Not all EEA members are in the Schengen area but they still enjoy freedom of movement rights, they just have to go through border control entering the Schengen area.

> In general you cannot move around within the eu and work from another country beyond 90 days. Which imho defeats the purpose of calling it a single market

This is inaccurate. As an EEA/Swiss citizen you still have the right to work beyond 90 days. I think you may need to register with the country's social security office beyond that though. The 90 day rule is effectively there to prevent benefit tourism.

For instance, when I moved to Norway some years ago for a job I was able to start work without any paperwork as a then EU citizen but had to register with the tax office for a tax number before they were able to actually pay me with the proper tax withholdings.

"""
If you want to remain in an EU, EEA state or Switzerland for more than 90 days, you may be asked to show that you are:

- In employment

- Self-employed

- A full time student with health insurance and money to support yourself

- You have money to support yourself and health insurance (for you and your family) without state assistance
"""

https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/government_in_ireland/...

Edit: Perhaps you are referring to remote work? If so then I think the situation in the EU is similar to that in the US where your employer must withhold state taxes in the state where you perform your work.
On the other hand, sometimes it’s better to avoid naming functions, especially if they’re small and only used once. For instance, if I’m doing something like ‘map (\(x,y) -> (x,y+1))’ to increment the second element of each item in a list (using Haskell syntax), naming the anonymous function won’t necessarily make anything clearer. Or consider this example from my own code:

zipWith (\i m -> fmap (i,) m) [0..]

Sure, I could rewrite it as ‘zipWith prependToEachElement [0..]’, but if you know Haskell that’s not all that much shorter or clearer, especially for a function which might only be used once in the whole program.
No, it does not have a way to render DAGs, it is purely a tree.

It does have a way to follow "links" (cells with the same text).
Even if there is no connection to our own time, history is one of the most effective teachers of the process of empathy out there. It requires you to be able to place yourself in another time, place, and context. I'll also note that military history and "elites having dick-measuring contests" is far from the trendy side of the last four or so decades of history research and writing. Cultural history, microhistory, and even history of science are all hot topics.
1. Object-oriented programming. At that time, no one gave a clear explanation of what was actually meant by it and how to implement it. The various schools of OOP often did not acknowledge the existence of other (heretical) schools, which caused a lot of confusion in my brain. Critical voices were hounded and silenced. Also, the gap between implementation and theory was always quite wide. I did not know Smalltalk at that time and have not seen it in use to this day.
2. Electromagnetic fields. I'm still not sure I understand them. I found this video helpful: https://youtu.be/XoVW7CRR5JY
Let’s see you sell your easy ten thousand percent increase in farming efficiency.

The reason it’s hard to sell hype to farmers is they live in the real world and they’re not impressed by idiots that are so wrong that stupid isn’t a big enough word to describe them.
https://github.com/gnat/text-to-speech-ubuntu
> As if we were walking together and you would repeatedly - voluntarily - step on my foot ?

I’m not a witness to your conversations. Take this with a grain of salt.

There’s a certain amount of “floor time” you get in a conversation before somebody else gets a turn. The right amount is going to be different depending on the individual people talking, their cultural backgrounds, and the nature of the conversation. If you try packing your sentences more densely full of information, then it’s natural that the amount of time you speak would be correspondingly shorter.

And no, this does not mean that other people need to compete with your level of density, or that they need to say things which are constructive to the conversation. Other people may simply want a chance to participate in the conversation as a speaker.

If we go with the metaphor about walking together—suppose we are in a museum, and you keep running ahead to the next room in the museum before I am finished looking at this room. If you like walking through museums quickly so you can see more pieces, and I like walking through museums slowly so I can spend more time looking at each piece, then we are going to have to come up with some kind of compromise.

If we go with a different metaphor, imagine that you are playing chess. You do not get to make extra moves just because you are faster. Imagine you play chess twice as fast as I do, and every time I make a move, you make two moves.

Again, I’m not a participant in your conversations, so this is conjecture and may not reflect reality.
I've seen this described as "active listening". But it may appear disingenious. It's really easy to fake "I like that" without having any actual interest in the topic. What's much more sincere is showing that you're paying attention by actually engaging with what was said. "So we went up there." "To the mountain, right?" "Yeah, we went to the mountain and..."
I’d love to see someone step up and try to improve this, there’s programs in place at both NASA and ESA for making access to their own archives of satellite imagery and other data, but there’s a lot more imagery out there. It would be good to have some kind of internet archive style depository run by an organisation dedicated to preserving the data.

So that satellite imagery providers could chuck them a copy with contractual guarantees about how and when the information can become public access, that satisfy the imagery providers and make the process streamlined enough to keep up with the increasingly volume of imagery being produced.

It would be a shame to see valuable archives of imagery that catalogs the history of our planet, lost due to someone losing track of the either the data itself or the copyright ownership (and thus are legally unable to keep the data) between now and the absurdly long time in the future that such images become public domain over a hundred years from now. Most companies don’t last a hundred years so this kind if stewardship feels like an important thing to start working on now rather than later.
I had thought because light was absorbed and re-emitted but that and scattering ideas are incorrect. See this video for an explanation of why light travels slower through a medium with an index of refraction greater than one.
https://youtu.be/CUjt36SD3h8
‘Avatar’ Struggles Show How Japan Is Ditching Hollywood
Because the average person always follows security advice?
The number of references are not an indication of the quality of a work. Adam Smith wrote a whole book on The Theory of Moral Sentiments but in Debt, Graeber invents Adam Smith's morality whole cloth.

I have no intention of reading Dawn of Everything but reviewers have noticed references that say the opposite of what the authors claim they say.
Giving drivers a sense of control that doesn't match up with how the vehicle performs in braking looks like a pretty big design flaw to me.
Blah blah blah.

This is all blah.

Noah is perpetually, painfully online. He has to be, because he makes his living (a) pointing out when people are wrong on the internet and (b) trying to convince people that he's really smart. All of his interactions with reality are through that lens. Seriously, It's January 1. Go look at how many tweets and retweets the guy has on twitter in the last 24 hours.

The internet does not want to be fragmented, because the internet seeks status.

People on the internet will seek status (see: Smith, Noah), and barring that, will seek the knowledge of those who have claimed status. And as long as those with the MOST clout congregate on a single platform, the rest of the people on the internet will follow. It makes logical sense for all of the actually important journalists to centralize around a hub like twitter because it's a way for them to keep their ear to the pavement. They are expected to report quickly on issues and it gives them the ability to stay up to date on quickly changing issues. Even for things as mundane as sports, almost all sports journalism is broken first or simultaneously on twitter. Twitter is the tool. The true value is in who is using it. It's what Musk has gotten hilariously backwards and why it will eventually bite him in the ass.

The right-wing sphere has Gab, Parler, AND Truth Social. Nobody reads them. Donald Trump's own posts on his own platform get far more reach by second-hand screenshots on twitter than on the platform he owns. Candace Owens doesn't gain any visibility by fighting with a nazi on Gab. She can get a lot of views by nitpicking a post from Maggie Haberman though.

The internet has ALWAYS wanted to gravitate to central locations. The post-Usenet years were an abberation because it was a time when a centralized source for information and conversation was disrupted. Those people sought out Digg, and then reddit. They're still on reddit. If it wanted to fragment, it'd have done it already.
This is true for literally everything you can possibly learn in school. You can learn math badly. You can learn physics badly. You can learn programming badly. You can learn personal finance badly. Professionals who work on history pedagogy work hard to prevent the sort of "memorize names and dates" approach. This shouldn't be considered a unique problem with history as a discipline.
Thanks, added a correction.
Maybe don't keep "all of your wealth" and "daily spending money" in the same bucket.
The original Smalltalk-80 VMs (Xerox and others) did not have JIT. Deutsch and Schiffman did the 1st JIT one (PS) that was the parent of the ParcPlace HPS VMs.
Do you know how long it takes to become a citizen?

I worked with a guy who came over to the US when he was just out of college. He went through the process as quickly as he could, and yet he was still in his late forties by the time he finally managed to become a citizen. A decade or two is not at all uncommon. And that's for in-high-demand professions where we desperately need to import that talent.

The "why can't you just" answer is almost always a big red flag that the speaker knows nothing about the actual problem or how hard it is to solve.
Heh. The cost of the individual animals means that all that dairy tech isn't really useful for sheep which is why I think renting tech in that space is the way to go. Distribution is still a problem for us though.
Is AI-complete an actual complexity class? Genuinely curious, I’ve never heard of it.
What is the skill they should teach
? To always eat lunch before doing a psych experiment? To like sugar, or marshmallows in particular, just slightly less? That high self-control in extremely low-reward situations is good?

Teaching a child to do basic budgeting with pocket money is likely to have a vastly higher impact than slight delayed gratification with candy.
You appear to have a successful, working product that does not rely on regulatory arbitrage to suck up profits from existing market participants.

Thus, your business is not appropriate for YC. That's a good thing. Outside of the Valley, YC and YC companies have a horrible reputation and would hinder your growth and mission more than it would accelerate it.
The compiler can't reliably make assumptions about whether const methods in C++ cause mutation, because both const_cast and aliasing are permitted.
Some women (Polgar for example) have argued the separate womens' titles significantly contribute to the gap in skill.
They don’t even eat the alfalfa sprouts they praise and they think chicken nuggets grow under Golden Arches.
Pardon if I'm just a little slow, yet not sure I follow what you're getting at.

If both the urban citizens and YouTubers are liberal, and the latter even (mostly) voted republican, then how are you defining 'liberal'?

Or is the distinction that things have changed over the years because YouTube broke geographic bubbles? So now even YT liberals often vote republican?
You can definitely steal houses though. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-essex-59069662 https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2008/march/ho...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/she-had-n...

You can also steal stocks. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/us-charges-ha...

> The vast majority of wealth in developed countries doesn’t rely on physical security to maintain ownership

Indeed, it relies on far sillier things like hoping that nobody spends $100 on a fake ID and pretends to be you.
But that's precisely what is so ridiculous. Eating marshmallows slowly is not a valuable life skill.
We all get slaughtered. It's possible Magnus could make one draw with white against a not-current Stockfish on limited depth out of a hundred games, but that would be about the best any of us could do.