skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You've actually done this recently, so probably you are right, but I'm still doubtful. Are there two separate unidirectional meters involved? And the solar panels aren't hooked into your electrical panel or in house electrical system in any way? What you are describing isn't impossible, but it's an odd default, and would seem to be a terrible deal for homeowners now that net metering is being phased out. While it's usually true (especially in California) that you can't keep your house powered while the grid is down, I don't think I've ever heard of a case where all locally generated power was sent 100% to the grid. I've only heard of this being done in cases where the same owner has generation happening at a different place on a separate electric account. Can you confirm?
I read earlier that Google has already declared ChatGpt as an existential threat. I am almost sure that Google will drop a huge update to search this year.
I have friends who use say the word "LOL" as well, but as a sarcasm.
You do the twitch for the fun or it's partially for making yourself committed in doing things?
It kinda reminded of this from commitment perspectives: https://medium.com/@maxdeutsch/m2m-day-1-completing-12-ridic...
So the best option seems to be to avoid any Python dependencies, as this is likely to happen again with Python 4.

The idea of having to test a language seems weird, either the interpreter runs, or it doesn't. Why should the Linux Distribution have their fingers in it?

Also, why does an interpreter need security updates? That's the job of the operating system, not applications, languages, or compilers. You should be able to run any random program in a safe and secure manner, no matter how evil it is.

It's the lack of capability based security that is the real problem with Linux.
Please also integrate with DDG.
i thought they would add it to teams or skype or something. Could be a superapp
Or they found Scrum to be unproductive and are looking for alternatives.
possibly still true
As long as I can disable it.

As long as I ALWAYS know when a GPT derived match is shown to me.

Preferably with a diagnostic akin to sql EXPLAIN.

Useful to be able to flag incorrect info although this is open to trivial subversion.
In Denmark, the traditional banks closed the branches. My bank (Danske Bank) has two branches left in the whole country.
The Lost Art of Software Design
> it's undergoing deprecation

In the "we would rather people not use this but it's going to stay around for a long time" sense. I strongly doubt it will disappear within the next decade or two. There's a long tail of setup.py-based tools.

Last I checked pyproject.toml only supports the simplest of Python/C extensions. Anything fancy, like --with/--without compilation flags to enable/disable optional support, compiler-specific flags (in my case, to add OpenMP), compile-time code generation (like using yacc/lex), etc. requires a setup.py and a bunch of hacking.
It's really just a matter of latency and bandwidth costs. If you can tolerate both, then keeping them in different data centers is fine. In fact, depending on your architecture, you may have to do this at some point anyway, even within the same cloud provider.
Clearly one of those metrics isn't low wait times. Another is certainly not 99.9% case resolution or escalation.
Probably to make up for the fact that the education system is utter shit. I'm relatively fresh out of it (21) and if I had to stay on after turning 16 it would have held me back significantly. If I was let out at 14 I'd probably have fared better.

Apprenticeships are underrated. Let students specialise and stop torturing them with irrelevant bullshit. Not once have I needed anything I was taught in maths beyond year 9. Study of English literature was particularly excruciating.
And nobody cares anymore, as it seems.
I figured Karen would be at the top by a mile.
I see a lot of people saying this, but it doesn’t make sense to me.

As your conversation evolves with the bot, targeted ads could be shown with the same (or better) level of intent data available based on the human’s input.
In Finland, the authorities probably would strike down a good chunk of this list down due to the naming laws.

There was actually a case where the authorities rejected the name "Lucifer" for a person due to its negative affiliations with Satan. It was taken to administrative court and Lucifer won.
Does this extend to foreign titles? I know a lot of Koenigs, Koonings, Kiralys, etc.

Edit: Not to mention Shah and Kaur.
The TV market is segmenting into smart people with dumb TV's and dumb people with smart TV's.
Your argument seems to be "treaties between nations are violated whenever it becomes expedient." This might be true in some cases, but I think a the Antarctic Treaty is a great counterexample.

Do you know about the overlapping territorial wedge claims in Antarctica and how they were suspended by the treaty? If not I think you would find it quite interesting.
That's not responsive to anything I just said.
Agreed.

> CHP said Tuesday that they have not determined what driving mode the Tesla was in, but it does not appear to be a contributing factor in the incident.

If they had "black box" information indicating the driver steered the car over the cliff, they would also know what mode the car was in.

If they did not have any indication of what happened, surely they would be investigating whether this was an Autopilot bug. Surely everytime there's a severe Tesla accident, this is the first thing on investigator's minds, as there have been several fatalities caused by Autopilot bugs, and it would be important to determine whether other vehicles were at risk. (ETA: Though I suppose CHP wouldn't be the ones investigating that, it'd be NHTSA, which weakens the argument I've made here.)

If they had footage showing the car going over the cliff, it wouldn't be enough evidence to know one way or the other (at least not without extensive analysis taking much more time than had passed), unless the footage could see clearly through the windows (unlikely). Same goes for an eyewitness who was outside the car like another driver.

That makes testimony and/or cell phone recordings from inside the car the most likely explanation.
In Denmark, you'd say something like "Can I get 50 on top"? Or "on the amount", if you didn't want cash.

This was many years back, I wonder if it's still possible.
>RISC-V is still not quite Raspberry Pi 4-level on the fastest chips, but is advancing quickly.

RISC-V is not quite Pi 4 level on the fastest SBC you can buy today, the VisionFive 2, where some kickstarter backers have already received their boards. It's around 80% as fast as Pi 4.

Sipeed have announced their LM4A with TH1520 SoC will be on sale late Q1. They've published benchmarks running at 1.85 GHz showing it is faster than Pi 4 at that speed, but it is supposed to run at 2.5 GHz with a heatsink.

SiFive have announced that their HiFive Pro board will be shipping in the summer, using Intel's "Horse Creek" SoC (which in turn uses SiFive P550 cores). The SoC was demonstrated running by Intel back in September. SiFive says the board will run at 2.2 GHz. It's should be similar performance as an RK3588 at similar clock speed i.e. quite a lot faster than a Pi 4.

Multiple other companies are working on RISC-V SoCs with performance in Apple M1 class, which is much faster than anything ARM themselves has. They're further away -- 2024 or 2025 -- but there is basically no doubt that they will come.

Android software probably isn't going to be ready for prime time until 2024 or 2025 anyway.
Google will have to match that somehow. I guess the search engine wars are getting hot again.

I think the real challenge is internationalization - it would be a challenge to build GPT-N like models for all the other languages, that work as well as the original one.

Interesting if Google will roll it's own language model for that purpose. Is it possible, that we might get several language models, each one for a specific category of users, or would that approach lead to a loss in generality/quality?
You know who treats Internet discourse as a good way to teach and learn? QAnon.

If your systems can’t prevent you from falling for QAnon, flat eartherism, or the time cube, you are exploitable and are likely already actively exploited.

Believing what you read in an HN comment is a terrible idea.
The key is that it is way faster and has a broader set of knowledge than a human. Being an editor is often easier and more productive than being both a single generator and editor
Thanks Microsoft. So bad Google is useless to me in this case.
Are you saying that the simple fact that many people have come to the same conclusion disconfirms that conclusion?
>rather than returning the whole internet in an order somewhat influenced by the search terms

Bing is just catering to their core users here, turns out this is an excellent idea for consuming and serving adult content.

Try out Bing vs Google for this purpose, and prepare to be amazed.
The Firefox Private Network browser extension
>or calculating pi in roman numerals

xxii
-----
vii

hmmm... now what do i do? how about uppercase/lowercase?

XXII
----- = III i iv ii viii ...
VII
I thought Google was doing that. I ask:

> What is the world record for crossing the English Channel entirely on foot?

It replies with swimming and crossing on ferries.

https://www.google.com/search?q=What+is+the+world+record+for...
Sure, https://morningfa.me/ (analytics tool) and https://incomeschool.com/project24/ (course) are both products that focus heavily on research based recommendations. Their YouTube channels (https://www.youtube.com/@Morningfame and https://www.youtube.com/@ChannelMakers) have a lot of good information as well.

They both have private communities where people freely share a lot of good info (especially Project24).

There are many others that I have heard good things about but have not checked out myself.
With the improved text embedding model, this is both doable right now and almost certainly more informative than a single text query string.
Training set placement is the new search placement. To get your product listed it needs to be in the model.
I liked the PBS Eons video on the topic, at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvfR3XLXPvw . 7.5 minutes.
Depends on the country you’re account is in. I got virtual cards before ever ordering the physical card.

But keep in mind it’s a bank debit card (charge immediately comes off your balance), not a credit card.
> Manufacturers were almost universally founded in an era when mechanical systems dominated and that's how they want to treat everything.

That is a huge understatement, as they mostly (majorly?) employ electrical/mechanical engineers who end up writing code for the ECU's. Cloud services are mostly an afterthought in design. In my experience, regulation isn't the main problem.
I’ll admit, I have completely cooked breakfast (eggs and toast, rummaging, flipping and all) with the Quest Pro passthrough, while watching a video on a giant virtual screen floating in my kitchen. The depth accuracy is very impressive.
I don't begrudge people getting grumpy about terms evolving through gradual misuse over time. It's certainly annoying. What I would say though is that if you have specific subsets of functionality that demarcate clearly through various dimensions - how hard they are to do, the type of technology needed, the typical use cases and real world value they create - then you really need some way to distinguish them if we are going to talk about it.

Alternatively, if you are going to just stick to one hyper general term then you can't really complain that product X is bad at Y because it doesn't do every single thing the general term Y encompasses. Language is fluid for a reason - it adapts to our needs to define and distinguish things. In this case, the Quest Pro does a subset of things quite well, while completely leaving other aspects of AR on the table. Whatever we refer to that subset as, it's not really valid to then say it's generically bad just because we don't have good words to describe what it does do.
There is a workaround link at the top of the thread. An important difference is that Bloomberg's paywall is intentionally semi-permeable - 'free' article limits, social media referrals, etc. The Information is (mostly?) an intentional 'hard' paywall - the content is only available to subscribers.
I'm not sure if the name "Karen" has suffered such cross-generational damage as "Adolf" or "Dick".
No, it doesn't, but it doesn't follow straightforwardly from the rationale the previous commenter gave, and that's telling. It's not complicated; it's a pretty simple motte-and-bailey.

Notice how neither you nor my previous interlocutor skipped a beat about the racial hierarchy I laid out, despite that not being in either of the previous two definitions of HBD on this thread. That's because the bailey is so well-understood it usually doesn't even need to be said.
Yes, we are entering a new era in the search engine world. It feels like Google entering the market in 1997. But Bing will probably continue to suck.
Not working in the field, I’m also having a hard time to grasp the difference. Is one MR because it’s 3D and the other AR because of 2D ? And is the collaboration part a defining feature ?

Where would you set Pokemon Go’s “AR view” [0] kind of implementations for instance ? (First link I found was for a headset, but I’m also actually curious how you qualify the phone only version of it)

Or what would it change if in you Gravity Sketch example each user would be seeing colors or rendering adapted to their vision/preferences making it a separate experience for each of them ?

[0] https://youtu.be/48fVUHnR5I8
When I want to buy something like an air fryer, I either want something to either tell me the best overall air fryer, or the best one for me (“best air fryer for individuals with small kitchens”). I don’t want to do a whole bunch of research with just the raw specs to try to determine which is the best one for a person like me.

I could be nice to have an AI ask me questions about what I hope to use it for, what kind of space I have, and what my budget is, and then give me some recommendations.
Google has got more vested interests in the old status quo.
Lese-majeste in kiwi land in the year of our lord 2023. Most peculiar.

Can I at least name my tui lady and my hamster justice?
Hey guys, it's me Elon. It's working for me. I don't know what you are talking about
In the US, a lot of the electrical grids were corporations (e.g., Con Edison on the East Coast is from Thomas Edison's company). I'd never looked it up before, but the predecessor to PG&E in San Francisco was the San Francisco Gas Company [1].

Of course, in 1896 an Edison company merged with the derivative of the original San Francisco Gas, to become San Francisco Gas and Electric. By 1905, that merged with something else to become PG&E.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Gas_and_Electric_Compa...
I would love to try fly.io but unfortunately it doesn't support GPU workloads yet. Waiting eagerly!
it kind of does. devices of newer generations are usually mentioned as such. also, similar headlines more often than not are about implementations in older hardware (more interesting because more challenging)
I dunno, verifying and adjusting an otherwise complete answer is a lot more rote than originating what that answer would be, and I think that has value.
I don't see Scott arguing for "racial supremacy" in any of the quoted emails though? He said he thinks genetic differences in intelligence are likely real, which is fundamentally different from "race x is superior to race y."
TIL, this is amazing. Thanks for the link
In saying "can model" it's really more of a subjective treatment, not so much referring to any particular object.

There are many typologies, easily hundreds, which go into these topics at different levels and in different ways. JCFs in general are a pretty common element in this kind of modeling within personality type.

You used the "typology" rainbow word, which is more than I'm used to reading here, but I'm not sure what kind of experience you're in it for. A friend made one of those once maybe, or you sense a given system to critique because you recognize the the sound of it being related, or a new type-thing to learn about, hell yeah that's your day job, or just familiar with the word typology, etc.
I too have a LG C1 55" from Costco but it did have a few nag screens to connect to the internet during setup. I ignored those and eventually an image appeared on HDMI 1 but the process wasn't really clear. That's my recollection.
I’ve been on the stakeholder side in similar situations. Rather than saying that they were very busy and that it can take a while to get my task done, they strung me along (“we’ll take it up in next sprint planning”, “oh we missed your task, but it might be added to next sprint”, etc). Granted, this is an anecdote, but if a team can only plan a couple of weeks ahead, how should stakeholders be able to plan?
I’m confused, isn’t your question nonsensical?
Having a virtual movie theater has been the killer feature for me. I sit in on my comfy couch and stream movies from my computer into the headset. Awesome. For me it is better than buying a real TV for the purpose of movie watching.

Also VR Chat (also an app) has been awesome for connecting and talking with new people. Environments from orbiting high above the earth in space to a rooftop restauraunt in Paris make it fun to spend a few hours with new people.

As other have said, inside other VR application there is a lot of "neat" "potential" but hampered execution due to software, hardware, or both. I always tell people we've made some gigantic leaps but we're still in the early stages.
They need to clearly mark the ads and they can be skipped with AdBlock rules then.
I can't wait for Python 4 to come out and millions of lines of Python 3 that will be written this year get trashed and rewritten after they declare a bunch of useless incompatible changes again.

And of course cue the endless lines of fanboys screaming get used to the new reality, rewrite everything to Python 4 cus Python 3 is EOL and gone folks!
Perhaps, while slowly learning, the machine will cry.
I am unable to open the link. Do you mind sharing a working one? Thanks.
Firstly. The range does not work for me. I need the car for long drives in the cold winter or hot summer. In the latter case, I need to have a bike on the roof and there is unlikely to be charging where I go to. I do not wish to sit and wait for the car to charge after a day full of sports. Secondly, the boot space does not work for me. I need to lug sports stuff and guitars/amps on a regular basis. Unless I go for the truck (and I don’t want to), there’s not enough space. Thirdly, the Tesla is just an awful car from the inside: the seats follow the worst US traditions of softness without comfort, there’s the bloody screen (the lack of physical buttons has been moaned about elsewhere in this thread). Fourth, I do not like the trust model. Somebody being able to fully control my car remotely? Nope. Fifth, I do not like the ecological footprint of the batteries. Sixth, it’s bloody expensive. I can get at least two fully loaded lightly used under-warranty bmw 530i tourings for the price of a model X. Which are better cars for me as a user. I could also go on about dubious engineering choices both physical and software, the antics of mr. Musk etc. But paying double the price for what is a worse car along every dimension?
So few Russians invaded a region and the population had decided to move out? No fight? Are those the same Ukrainians who are now kicking the shit out of Russian army? What you are saying does not make any sense. Again hard to believe.
Also want to add: follow my heart; use my intuition and instinct--these ones are so transparent and at-home and familiar to me I sometimes forget to say them! :) -- ask for help from friendlies; you're never really alone, help's always available if you ask, especially from unexpected sources. :)
Thanks for uMatrix and NopeCHA. This saved my life from shortening( just from frustration).
https://archive.ph/2JxZB
It's far more likely that Musk just decided he didn't want to pay the rent because he thinks he can get away with it.
Copy pasting one password into a phishing website.

vs.

Whole database of passwords being compromised in one swoop due to browser/plugin bug, change of terms, or change of ownership.

The latter is more dangerous no matter how we slice it. Manual process (isolation) and a bit of care are the logical choice imo.
Note for myself in the future: avoid all invitations to forums and colloquia
I know and I think that's bad. I asked dang if we could add the shallow lazy (but all-too common) dismissal, "Sounds like it was written by ChatGPT" to the list of banned behaviors. Did not hear back. :)
Depends on who you know and where specifically you are. I have been to house parties in Mountain View that resonate with this. And loads of parties (mostly SF/Oakland) that had music and K. And the occasional crypto douche.
You didn't type the links he approvingly cited in by hand, and pull them up in archive.org, to see what they said, did you? That makes sense --- it's a pain --- but why would you hang your argument on the premise that nobody else took the time to do it? The links lay it pretty bare.

Somebody should take the time to further archive them, since this author keeps popping up, and, inconvenient though this truth is, it remains the apparent truth that he sent emails saying he believed this stuff.
Just logging in.
This has been going for many years already, with Google giving answers right in the search results and just using websites as their private content factories. The relationship has become more and more uneven every year, with no pushback from the websites (a collective action problem, some traffic is better than no traffic, or worse, traffic to your competitor) and it probably won't change as long as Google pays lip service and adds a few links once in a while. The quality of content and therefore the quality of Google's search results suffer in the long term because it makes no sense to invest in it, but as long as it's good for Google's quarterly results, they don't care. Their problem is new sites like Discord and mobile-only apps that never got addicted to traffic from Google in the first place.
One of these things is not like the others.

Stackoverflow has value for these models, the others will just make the nonsense responses worse.
Username checks out...?

Anyway, Bing being a pr0n search engine is equal parts meme and reality.

I like how Microsoft/Bing don't take themselves too seriously since usurping Google in this regard is a fool's errand at this point.
Maybe its better in some programming languages, but my experience with verilog/systemVerilog output is that it generates a design with flaws almost every time (but very confidently). If you try to correct it with prompting it comes up with reasonable sounding responses about what its fixing then just creates more wild examples.

One pretty consistent way to see this is to ask for various very simple designs like a n-bit adder, it will almost always do something logically incorrect or syntactically incorrect with the carry in or carry out
Not if it is based on search. It will ground its replies in existing data, with explicit links.
What answer were you expecting?
Maybe, but I think you all underestimate the extent to which this was already going on en masse before ChatGPT was released to the public. Who gets to access all the juicy new tech before it filters down to the masses? Who indeed? ;) Not saying OpenAI was involved, but this sort of high-level "conversational" tech has been available for a long time in secret.
Larry David covered this: https://youtu.be/DAwlx0aTBi4