skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is so true. Nothing worked to get my daughter to sleep nights until we finally bit the bullet and stepped away for 20 mins and let her cry out. Every night since then she has slept all night long.

Every child is different which is why parenting is not an exact science. Try everything, something will work!
A handful received support. I think Mono got a PR too.
There's a whole field of work around AI Observability - tracing how data moves through a model. It's intended to help identify biases in the input data, and to help answer the question of "why did it make this decision".

And if you can trace how data moves through the model, you can identify "that output came from these inputs" and add the associated metadata.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wlroots/wlroots/-/releases has the newest wlroots,google still leads to github wlroots which has an old 0.14 release
> For userland programming, what matters is the syscall level, as that is expensive

which is why pretty much every programming language buffers file output by default

even C

(other than Go, obviously)

> Whether the kernel then does internal buffering is irrelevant

everyone that's attempted to write reliable software that cares about what ends up on disk, or the other side of the socket will disagree
Is this the same as using react-native-web, which in turn was implemented with styled-components cross platform?
It may raise wages if there was limited pool of workers. But given today's world with massive migration and few import taxes, that may mitigate most of the hit.

Other change would be a drop in consumption. Similar to WFH, staying-at-home reduces a lot of purchases. And you got time to do a lot of things in-house instead of buying out in the market.

Another thing what I noticed, there's what my wife and I call „mamonomics“. Stay-at-home moms running tiny grey-legal at-home operations. Orchestrating community events, helping neighbours with small services (e.g. making cakes, fixing clothes)... Otherwise good part of what goes in „mamonomics“ would be hired services.
I do a very similar thing with Polybar and a custom script. Polybar runs the script and displays whatever the script prints to stdout. I communicate with the script using rofi and a unix socket. I use this to help me focus on a task and track how much time I'm spending on it.
I'm not sure that's necessarily the case. It's possible that the journalist or activist has a goal for attempting to cause problems that is unrelated to the specific topic they are generating text about.

For example, the journalist may be motivated by a desire for a sensationalist story. The activist may be opposed to AI itself and is looking for any way to discredit it without caring about the specific topic.
"...less checked and have probably more health problems."

More checks = more possibilities to find some kind of problem. So statistically, in wealth countries diagnoses are higher in measured numbers.
I'm all for that! But what I'm talking about is people (like the person I replied to) that present their N=1 anecdote as the gospel of how to parent right.
Is it limited to mono-hierarchies or is there a way link pieces of informations to multiple parents? Maybe for something like tagging? It's particularly useful for organizing tags in a thesaurus.
I love the idea, can’t wait to try it!
The AI learns to generate watermark-like things, because those exist on a large fraction of its inputs.

It doesn't mean the rest of the output existed in the training set. It's perfectly capable of generating a completely novel picture, then slapping a watermark on it.
How can the be in the ring if they can't even make it to orbit.
Not sure, but a lot of people don't want to pay the learning cost to enter the emacs universe.
https://opensource.apple.com/releases/
Many of these have a `TryParse` method [1] which makes for nice syntax, and of course then you get a variable of the correct type.

if (int.TryParse(userInput, out var number))
{
total += number;
}

This is cleaner code compared to try/catch and usually faster (though debatable if it matters) [2].

[1] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.net.ipad...

[2] https://stackoverflow.com/q/161942
Offtopic:

I loved the cartoon character on the website.

He popped up on one side when I was in the middle of the article and said "Hope I did not startle you. May I interest you in my newsletter?". I said "No thanks" and he went away.

And when I reached the end of the article, there he was again -- sitting on a small mound, and waiting patiently for me to finish reading and get there eventually.

Somehow it felt very "natural" that he would wait for me at the end -- knowing I would meet him there again, just in case if he could be of any help.

Loved the little touch. Not sure if the author/designer meant it this way though.
For launching payloads into LEO? Yes, see Rocket Lab. Small sat operators are using both.
I use 1Password with my elderly MIL but she finds it confusing. Even though she has been using computers for 30+ years and a Mac for 15+ years something about the process of clicking the 1P icon in the browser bar or going to 1Password to copy a password frequently trips her up. She will try to remember or write down the password and manually enter it into whatever field she's been prompted to fill.

As for why we use 1Password instead of iCloud Keychain: my spouse and I are routinely tasked with helping my MIL log into sites, so we have set her account to default to saving to a shared vault we each have access to (we have a separate 1Password family account to share between my spouse and I).

We briefly tried a Yubikey and other biometric options and ran into what is apparently a common problem for elderly people: she has barely perceptible fingerprints. She could not use Touch Id on her iPhone when that was a thing and cannot reliable use it on her 2022 MacBook Air.

I hate to say this but shifting to a long, memorable passphrase (reused across sites) coupled with a second factor may be more useful for an elderly user.
I would love something like this that just does an HTTP request instead of sending an email so it can integrate more easily with the rest of my infrastructure.
The great thing about anycast is the IPs are the same for everyone, it’s just which POP routing converges on that is different. DNS and anycast are combined primarily for load balancing and failover. Anyone can get and use the IPs directly with dig.
It depends on what context you're operating in. The reality is that most people don't fully understand authentication / authorization properly so they often mess up. When you have a small team of engineers that are spread very thin, it might be better to delegate this responsibility. If you have the time and resources to study the topic in depth and implement it properly then it's fine. It's just not that interesting of an area since the space for innovation and creativity is limited, and since the major problems have already been reliably solved by others at best you end up with an equivalent outcome and at worst you end up with security issues.

If you're operating within an enterprise context, Keycloak [0] is pretty massive but provides comprehensive coverage for all authN and authZ needs, and it's open source.

Back when I first started studying this topic I found that reading through a lot of NIST guidelines was helpful. I'd recommend at least browsing through SP 800-63-3 [1], SP 800-63A, SP 800-63B, SP 800-63C to get a good idea of the domain. Admittedly, this might be a lot of overkill for your application and needs.

[0] https://www.keycloak.org/

[1] https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-63/3/final
When Copilot was released the copyright discussion focused exclusively on code, but now we see very similar discussion around images with stable diffusion and the sister project unstable diffusion. When Copilot do reach the courts there will be some indication on how courts view author consent when it comes to training material. After that we might then see court cases for each form of media (images, video, text, sound), and also in their each unique contexts (books, online videos, porn, stock databases, and so on).
> Are there any true competitors for SpaceX?

RocketLab (Neutron), Relativity (Terran R), and Blue Origin (New Glenn) are all trying. But none of them are there yet.

Out of the bunch, RocketLab has the most operational experience. They're also the only company (of the above three) that isn't currently aiming for 2nd stage reuse.

It'll be interesting to see how things shake out.
> nothing about today changes human psychology from the ancients

With the possible exceptions of all the electronics and changes in diet and greater population densities and . . . the fact that the ancients didn't have psychology. I'm sure I missed some factors.

> There is no need to justify the choices you make.

Because psychologists study how we do that so we don't have to?
Sure. I’ve done it for Bel.

(def no (x)
(id x nil))

(def atom (x)
(no (id (type x) ‘pair)))

(def some (x f)
(if (no x) nil
(f (car x)) x
(some (cdr x))))

(def all (x)
(if (no x) t
(f (car x)) (all (cdr x))
nil)))

I don’t even have to pull up bel.bel to know that those are almost perfect replicas. I typed it on my iPad.

EDIT: as far as I can tell, the only diff is that all comes before some. https://sep.yimg.com/ty/cdn/paulgraham/bel.bel?t=1595850613&

I could have kept going through most of the implementation.
but what does it mean to destroy the concept of ownership (i.e. the notion of property)

if we take that

> The only way to truly own something, is to either share it or destroy it.

could I argue that then, we would be taking ownership of the concept of ownership??

ahahha... I think this is kind of funny. And I'd admit that it's not very helpful to the goal of revising the very concept of ownership.

my own parent comment is already controversial with many replies and exactly 0 points (at the time of this response)
It can still be very life-and-death if your survey says that the natural gas line is half a meter from where it actually is.
Is ChatGPT a “Code Red” for Google Search?
The Programming Booster Pack
When I first encountered the Haskell Parsec library, the beauty of parser combinators hit me and I felt I'd never have to write a regular expression again.

This hasn't been the case because I had to work in other languages where usage of regexes was more idiomatic/commonly understood. Parser combinators are great but most of the time, the problem can easily be solved using a regex and we can't really justify adding yet another library in the dependencies for the rare case it would be better suited.

In addition to all the benefits they can provide in terms or readability, re-usability and abstraction, parser combinators can even compete with regexes in terms of performance. https://pl-rants.net/posts/regexes-and-combinators/
> 21. Talking is often an overt showing of need. Therefore this rule: No talking.

I'd argue that silence is even more powerful than 'no'. Learning to wield it properly has served me incredibly well.
Wait, weren't Nvidia drivers finally open-sourced not so long ago?
Personally, I don't want minimalistic programs to start taking 20+GB! Xcode's bloat isn't a goal to strive for.

If such a giant list of acknowledgements were to be included, would it even help anyone, in any way? It sounds like pure inefficiency.
I really wanted to like wayland as the 'next big thing', but for the life of me I can't.

* I've yet to see any actual, honest to god benefits for the end user. Literally everything I've seen is the fact that it makes development easier for the wayland devs and harder for literally everyone else.

* Trying to use a wayland window manager outside of gnome or kde leaves you reliant on a bunch of hackish utilities (redshift, taskbar, screen recording / sharing, etc) which are available on AUR and basically no where else

* Scaling and perf for xwayland apps (i.e. most apps) is pretty bad.

Is wayland the future? Maybe, but I'll happily use xorg for the next decade if needed until the user experience is rock solid over on wayland.
The answer is of course it's possible, so long as you have a couple of
gigabytes spare for the acknowledgements page. Any construct worth
attributing will have roots in billions of parameters.
This is very common coming from small shops and moving to larger orgs. I am happy to have started my career gradually going from very small to medium to larger orgs. I think it's made me a much more well rounded dev. A lot of people that go straight into very large organizations have the disadvantage of narrowly focusing on a piece of software and often their learning is slower because of organizational complexity. At (good) smaller companies you have much more freedom to experiment and make mistakes, which is essential for learning fast.
Agreed.

You don't mind if I borrow your car do you?

And your house?

Let's not quibble about the particulars of me ever giving them back.
Some of the funniest lorum ipsum I've seen in awhile.
considering that information is something static (which doesn't change) that describes (is about) how something else is changing

I think that indeed, it is the inherent nature of information to radiate itself, i.e. to share (to shine, to spread)
Google Home Mini remote call demo
You mean the qr// operator. qx// is the generic operator for backticks.
Seems kind of pointless. The entirety of the US is already surveyed using survey units. Land plots are divided using survey units. People buy and sell land using survey units.

100 links per chain, 10 links per furlong, 8 furlongs per mile. 1 acre = 1 chain x 1 furlong
For better or worse, AI is a combination of machine learning algorithms. And these algorithms are black boxes solely because we don't add observability to them - we aren't looking.

But there is a desire to understand why an AI provided the output it did (to increase trust in AI generated output), and so there's a lot of study and work going into adding that observability. Once that's in place, it becomes pretty straightforward to identify which inputs to a model provided what outputs.
In my opinion using all of the code on GitHub without respecting the licenses was a capital mistake. It should have been opt-in, maybe with some incentive but to just take it all without so much as a by-your-leave is not going to play well in court.
Decentralised Cabs already exist:

black cabs in the UK(well only London) are all independent. The only thing that is common is that they have a license to operate and have passed the "knowledge"

Minicabs in the UK are different, you need to be Disclosure and Barring Service "passed" ie not a convicted sex pest. Every town used to have a number of minicab firms. You needed to know the number of a few of them. There are a number of aggregators that now act as a broker to them (even though uber exists here.)
Yes, most broadband is a wire cutter away from disconnection from the outside.
Even if that theory of operation were true, it seems like an implementation detail that would be largely irrelevant in a court of law. Infringement is infringement regardless of how complicated your method for committing it was. If your AI reproduces a copyrighted work verbatim without permission, surely you are committing infringement? If you would be infringing by doing it via copy and paste, I would think a court would be likely to find that you infringed when you used an AI to do it. It does not matter that the algorithm on the backend is fancy...
> My point is one shouldn't bring up Apache in the first place when talking about a project like Log4j. It's similarly irrelevant as "hosted on GitHub".

That isn't comparable.

- the name of the project is "Apache Log4J"

- the tag-line is "*Apache Log4j* 2 is an upgrade to Log4j that provides significant improvements over its predecessor..."

- it's hosted under the Apache organization

- the documentation, release notes, and bug tracker is under the apache.org domain.

- the artifacts are published under the org.apache namespace

- etc.

No competent person in the industry is going to think that GitHub is associated with the projects it hosts. There are also hundreds of projects stewarded by Eclipse, Red Hat, and other similar organizations that avoid this confusion by using sensible branding.

What you're saying is more equivalent to "no reasonable person would think that Vitamin Water contains vitamins and is healthy".

https://www.businessinsider.com/coca-cola-glacau-vitaminwate...
Auth.js is just a library that uses a pluggable backend. They have a Prisma one, I wrote an EdgeDB one, etc.
Yes, whoever signed off on that wasn't thinking clearly.
When you pay for FSD part of a lease, then return the car before any part of FSD was ever released to the public (and thus available to you), Tesla refuses to refund. Outright, bald faced fraud.
Historical gender roles were an efficient reaction to material circumstances of life, not a matter of politics. Men were more comfortable than women in the public sphere (which used to be a lot more contentious and competitive historically than it perhaps is today), and someone had to do all the crummy housework (unless you were in the upper class and could afford servants) so it fell on women to do that. Then the world, by and large, became a lot comfier and safer; and home appliances meant we could dispense with a lot of strenuous domestic labor. That's when it became possible for "lifestyle" to be a matter of choice.
AI art they clearly does not.

It does not 1-1 recreate source material, but if we didn't have human artists anymore and replaced them all with the current stock of AI we would have no more developing art movements. It is wholly uncreative in a way that humans are not, and it does not understand what humans would find interesting, only what humans have already made. This makes it a pretty good tool for some amateurish applications or places where quality isn't important, but it is not a 1-1 copy of a human capable of making human art.
Hacked Russian files reveal propaganda agreement with China
Why are some things shell builtins? (intermediate) anthony explains #510
One possible reaction to a moral panic is another moral panic and that's exactly where I think we are here.

Cancel-culture panic is a largely anecdote and feelings-driven. There's no real data to show that firings or social consequences for speech are more numerous or more severe or more unjust (or even more "left-wing") today than they have been at any point in the past.

And in many of these anecdotes that seem to drive the discourse, nothing of note actually happens to the person who was "cancelled" - they are the subject of an investigation or social media dust-up for a news cycle. Then life carries on.
I like logseq because it's one of the few editors to support org-mode (besides emacs).
You have an incredibly screwed up impression of feminism.

It's literally a movement that seeks to gain equality for women. That's it. Gaining dignity is a large part of the movement!

There's no feminist creed that says "go out and have lots of sex". There are married feminists. There are asexual feminists. There are a lot of lesbian feminists.
> Guy personally lobbied against having vaccine tech be put in the public domain.

I think the reason was that he didnt want company to manufacture vaccines with defects and no quality control. In theory that sounds reasonable.
They open-sourced a kernel intermediary driver that talks to a proprietary binary blob running in userspace. The driver itself is still proprietary.
No I remember this as well, but iirc this was back when they first rolled out a paid tier and were still experimenting with pricing.

I don’t think this offer still exists and I vaguely remember that it was always meant as a temporary way to quickly generate some cash.
How science fiction predicted recent high-tech developments in chemistry
The whole thing stems from developers wanting "easy" to use logger and mixing "a formatting string" with "actual thing being formatted". The vulnerability is bad enough on its own but having API of library allowing to pass one argument that is then treated as format string practically ensues someone will do on accident

if library have interface being

.log(format,value...)
.log(format)

It is kinda easy to assume second invocation would not apply formatting and just act as plain value, because it makes zero sense to have format string with no inputs, yet that's what Log4J does.

Separating it for "log" and "log with formatting" calls helps a bunch, at the very least makes easier to search for potentially vulnerable code.
There seems to be this narrative that Euopeans went to Africa and stole all the people and forced them into slavery. This is not true at all. Europeans traded with African leaders who sold their slaves to the Europeans. Not saying what they traded was a fair price or was justified, but the africans had the slaves first. The Europeans bought and distributed them round the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade
Saying C is fine, does not make it fine though. The facts speak for themselves: even the best programmers in this world which are extremely conscious about security have vulnerabilities in the software they wrote because of C. There were two remotes vulnerabilities in OpenBSD since it's creation, more recently there was a vulnerability in the ping utility of FreeBSD, etc.

C without undefined behaviors is not C anymore by the way. It would be something else.
> Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin is a competitor in theory

Not really, even in theory. It's only even remote current participation in the orbital market is the very overdue BE-4 engines it is developing for ULA (which I assume is “the consortium” that the upthread poster excluded in asking about competition.) Currently, its a suborbital launch company with aspirations of sometime becoming something more.
Duplicate of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34183738
Honestly that was my thought in 2018~2019 when it was like $2000 to upgrade from EAP. Funding their R&D, fine, sure.

$15k this many years into it being "meh" feels almost criminal.
When I was homeless, I found a job with a "call center". Our training consisted of teaching us the cover story and how to handle reactions to it. We began with a joke involving alcohol. Then if they didn't hang up we launched into the pitch: "We just lost our lease on our warehouse, and we've got to move all these pens. You can get them imprinted with your name and phone number for a bargain. What do you say?"

I quit within 3 days because I'm not a liar.
I took surveying class. And while I am familiar with the terms of links, chain, and furlong, I have never used it in studies or practice (between 2005 and now).
The site’s crashing on iOS Safari before loading finishes (client site exception), so I can’t see the contents. The library doesn’t look too good so far…
The only one I’m going to be sad about is going from Fahrenheit to Celsius, outside of the slightly harder to remember water freezing and boiling points, Fahrenheit seems like it has a better UX for weather comfort. Because the scale is spread out more, each 10 degrees corresponds pretty well to a type of dress, whereas a 10 degree swing in Celsius is pretty drastic.

I’m sure Celsius users have their own mental mapping for that, but it‘s not going to be simple 10 degree bands.
I'd wager that most folks would consider the code for some basic list operations to be a little different from outputting a complete specific implementation of a fast square root function with its exact constants, including the comments.
The First Romantics
I really like this, it rings so true to me in the current times.
Temporal everything, air, food; a life even-keel.
Atlas Shrugged is a much more of a bore than this content. At least this analysis is based in reality.
Another idea - why don't plug in faker.js as an UDF?
And then you are on vacation and some asshole in legal sues you because you didn't respond in time when a dev had a small problem they could've solved by looking in the source code for 5 minutes but wanted support instead.

Way too risky.