skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Like any connector that is mass produced it tends to be cheap and with good cables at very small price and thus people tend to use it for other purposes like the 20V input. Well as RJ45 used for serial connections, passive PoE standards that will put 24V on whatever you connect no matter that it can handle it, audio jacks used for analog video or even power, and similar stuff.

It’s not obvious that if a connector fits it will work!

Is it wrong? To me not, you have to be careful, just as you can plug a 3kW space heater with an extension cord with a 0.75mm2 cable and burn your house down you can use the wrong usb C connector (that will unlikely start a fire)
It's a radical way to squeeze a ton of money out of investors. Sell at the peak, drive down the price with antics, buy it all back with a tender offer at discount.
If you regularly actually test it, it should be fine. (Using a popular solution without testing it is riskier)
It is amazing the number of hours sunk, even in our little business, into defeaturing or really just remodeling, into a more experimentally conductive fashion, any of our prototypes which involve complex lofted multi-body assemblies. This just adds another layer into the design-data stack between the design phase and cam phase, which all needs to be maintained. I'll be quite interested to see their software evolves.
Apple will just ship a phone with no charging port and adopt wireless charging exclusively.
Represent the model probabilistically, like with markov chains or similar.
Of course, I was alluding to HTTP's ubiquity.

If you want your protocol to be used in browsers you need to speak their language. I'm claiming that it's not something to overlook, especially since asking people to install and run additional software standalone/alongside is impractical.
Tesla is underperforming the market so macro issues aren't that relevant.

And given they famously don't do marketing they have relied entirely on the click bait loving finance media. Can't complain now when it turns against them.
The expected downside of a lost bag is a lost bag.
> "The destructiveness of the solution is not determined by the acid [...] it is determined by the acid's concentration."

I'd say you're at the "know enough to be dangerous" phase. The destructiveness of concentrated H2SO4 (sulfuric acid) to flesh is at least as much due to its extremely exothermic hydrophilic behavior as to its low pH. Hydrofluoric acid is typically weak (pH-wise) as an acid, but is a horrific delayed-action contact poison. Concentrated nitric acid is a dangerously powerful oxidizer, or worse. Yet concentrated phosphoric acid is arguably less dangerous than propane.

[DISCLAIMER - Neither HN nor I are in any way responsible if you pop any statement in this item your empty little head, and head off in search of your very own Darwin Award. If you have no professional safety training in handling dangerous and/or highly-concentrated acids, then you should completely avoid them.]
The right solution is not thinking about it at all. The only extant malicious chargers anyone has shown evidence of have been proof-of-concepts whose concept hasn't worked in nearly a decade.

If you're worried about purely theoretical attacks, you should also be worried about your power bank's firmware being infected from the malicious port and subsequently infecting your phone.
Nurbs, or non-uniform rational b-splines, to be specific
I was shocked to find out that Aboriginals in Australia were enslaved as recently as the 1970s: https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/archived/busht...
I think it sounds like Musk looked at humans and went "we do fine with just vision, so make the computer do it with just vision, that has to be good enough"

Which underappreciates the fact that it is such a hard problem (nature had 500M years to iterate on the reference design) that you want to cheat as hard as possible by giving yourself the best sensor information you can.
Losing 70% of the value of the collateral, makes me wonder where the price floor that would trigger a margin call for Musk’s creditors is.

This isn’t a good financial situation for the lenders.
Thanks for taking this train of thought through-and-through to its logical conclusion. leehuffman was being unreasonable bordering on absurdity, so I did not feel the need to engage with the posts, but you took it all the way to the end despite the rudeness and demonstrated how untenable/inconvenient the proposals were.
For those in a situation you may want to consider renting a truck from Uhaul or similar. They’re only open during business hours and will be way more expensive but a vehicle is a vehicle.

I can’t say I recommend then offering to shove everyone else in the back.

This has been one of the reasons I heavily lean toward direct flights now - that way if stranded im either at home or my destination.
> these tasks and positions are low-skilled and fungible.

Any task requiring or being > 100% better when done with more than one person is now a team. We are now optimizing team output and talking about low-skill is no longer an accurate description of the problem.

It also under attributes how important having a quality fitment/parts prep person could be to the quality and pace of the output. Adding another person can make the work 2x or more productive. If they can spot problems before they get to the welding stage, even more.

When I was young and while I was probably the A-team of the B players in the org, I romanticized about what it would be like to be in a high performing org of all A-players. This thinking is flawed, it devalues the importance of the b-players and puts an outsized importance on the high value heroes.

That prep person may be fungible on day zero, but by the end of the week, they should be a high functioning team member. The value bigot will say that the person that only preps the pipeline should only be paid X/hr because the work is low-skill. But their value to the system is much higher. We should be thinking in systems ant labels about what each component of that system is worth.
> This was quite hard hitting.

This has been the reality since (just after) the onset of the recycle narrative took off. Noise is made, action never taken. The news outlets that show the horrific fatal diseases that children (with no other income) acquire through the scavenging has been a slow news day story for decades. See youtube - children, scavenge, dump. Anyone who sees the horrific waste of child-serving-sized coke plastic bottles, held together by more plastic, for 8$ at Target^ should be disgusted by the unavoidable sins of the US capitalist culture.

^You can get glass bottles held together by cardboard for slightly less, not that I'm advocating this purchase either.
Writing code can be an art form, but I think there's a lot of software out there that really does need to be developed with the same amount of rigor as you'd use to design a bridge or a building, because people are depending on it functioning correctly. Nothing catches on fire if a singer makes a lousy rhyme. (At least, not unless they have a really harsh audience.)
This happens at the end of every hype cycle. People are dissatisfied, everybody is looking for the next big thing, and a bunch of people and companies throw spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. A winner will eventually emerge, but it can take some time. A good example from the last generation: who remembers OpenLaszlo or YUI?
Asphalt is in fact a substantial source of pollutants: https://news.yale.edu/2020/09/02/asphalt-adds-air-pollution-....
>I hold that all interpretations of QM are just crutches that are better or worse at helping you along to the Zen realization that QM is what it is and doesn’t need an interpretation. As Sidney Coleman famously argued, what needs reinterpretation is not QM itself, but all our pre-quantum philosophical baggage—the baggage that leads us to demand, for example, that a wavefunction |ψ⟩ either be “real” like a stubbed toe or else “unreal” like a dream.

Sounds more like a cop-out
>It may be a fantasy wrought by the ending of Robinson Crusoe (which bugged me that he didn't make a sequel)

But check out The Swiss Family Robinson. Read both Crusoe and the latter as a kid.
> Why?

Because history is as valuable to humanity as memory to the human.
I'm pretty sure the stock will continue to decline.

But still, there's a big issue of risk vs reward at play here. A short-seller would have made a significant amount of money if they've been short since $300 (or higher).

There's always a time to "Collect your chips off the table". It always feels too early when you do so. But you gotta run the calculation: is staying in and possibly losing everything worth the risk? If so, how much reward do you think you're gonna make?

By staying short, the full $190 / share gains from this trade remains at risk. And for what? The chance that it maybe turns into $230 / share gains? There's definitely a risk/reward calculation at play here. If you're really certain about that $70 price point coming up, then yeah, hold onto the shorts a bit longer. But anyone who has watched a 70% collapse of a stock that they sold short really should be considering just taking profits. How much further do you think it really can fall?

----

If you're certain to hold onto those shorts... maybe buy a couple of call options to lock in your wins, at the cost of theta-decay. There's other ways to hedge and "lock in" some of the winnings.

But no trader should be the idiot who "bets it all on black" over-and-over-and-over again. You gotta take your chips off the table at some point, and today is a good day as any other day.
Surely they should be staffed to mount at least a minimal response to security incidents even over holidays?

A malicious actor wouldn’t wait until business hours.
My go to is "useful idiot in every room"
> most of the people around these parts of the continent (Eastern Europe) don't care about the novels themselves

That’s false. The Tolkien novels are very well known in Russia. There was a huge role playing subculture in 90s and 00s, probably still is.
https://archive.ph/YaQDD
> Laws are not algorithms, because a human legal system has wiggle room.

Is this "wiggle room" the fundamental difference between laws and algorithms, so fundamental that we have to fear values withering when algorithms rule, but not when laws rule?

Is it the reason the ruling class can't operate through laws, only through algorithms? Does it prevent humans executing policies from saying that "it's not my fault, it's just policy"?
The wikipeida article you linked to points to many many pieces of evidence that are not "mythical gospels and other Christian sources". Occam's razor would dictate that the simplest explanation for an extremely fast rise in numbers of dispersed communities evangelizing the teachings of a person is that such person existed and espoused those teachings, right?

Also it's just incorrect to say "as an atheist I have no skin the game". If you are agnostic/atheist you range from questioning to non-beleif in god which necessitates that Christianity and other religions could be or are wrong. It seems ridiculous to me to hold a position that contradicts another and say you have no skin in deciding wheather the other one is right.
Oh that's very interesting because for me, it just gave me an answer and didn't judge me and I didn't edit it at all.

https://imgur.com/a/H2afxKO
A lot of people thought that we should not preserve pre-war architecture, and that's why we now have a lot of modernist and brutalist architecture in its place.

I do agree that aesthetics and fitting into the neighborhood should come into the equation somewhere: the Barbican is probably worthy of preservation, some random shitty shoebox municipal library or housing estate probably isn't.
I firmly believe that if every fucker designing those standards had to provide 2 different reference implementations (say 2 different languages so idiosyncrasies don't leak into design) plus full test suite for every feature we'd be with far simpler and better working standards, coz maybe someone will realize "fuck, this is hard to implement right, maybe we should rethink it?"

Instead it's yet another standard that looks like someone that fell out of the ivory tower outhouse.
If you get stable diffusion running and train a simple dataset, you can probably feel a level of visual satiation the same way chatgpt creates a verbal satiation.

It reminds me mostly of communities built around conspiracy theories and mental illness.
I agree with this. What I'd say further is that if you're a generalist, you're not really in a position to pitch yourself as such. You either need to build a relationship with someone who recognizes that you can have some non-traditional role, or you need to spin your experience to someone who's looking for a specific skillset. Telling someone you're as good at some specialist thing as people who are specialists at it comes off as bad and falls as flat as calling yourself a polymath (or any of the other phrases people seem to come up with)

Pitching "I can do anything" doesn't work.
Have you seen their protocol overview?

https://atproto.com/guides/overview
Show HN: Attain self-mastery with the Tuduka Method
There are several examples on public streets without human drivers, random video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5eaOo-2eJM

Waymo, Cruise, and a few other companies are sending out empty cars to pick people up. They have off site people to remotely take over if the cars get confused, but such handoffs are in no way fast enough to deal with a safety issue and can easily scale to have thousands of cars per backup driver based on disengagement statistics.

This is the same way automation has always occurred. You get the machine to deal with 90%, 99%, then 99.9% etc of cases until people move from doing job X, to being backup, to troubleshooting problems.
The USG wouldn't nationalize Space X. They would revert to preferring ULA and would throw more money at Starliner.

I recall ULA being more diversified across states, so it'd probably make a bunch of legislators happier anyhow.
You need to find mighty shitty cable and they aren't talking about charge speed, but transfer speed...
I never said that. I do stand by GP’s claim that taking off and putting on PPE repeatedly and putting parts on a cart is stupid and low-skilled work, respectively, compared to welding.
> If the last line gets truncated between the `s` and the `p`, then `ls` gets executed.

My shell[0] dies with a error "source file did not end with a newline". This is easily solvable in general, regardless of what's in PATH, as long as the shell works correctly. Valid text files do not end with bytes other than 0x0A. Being truncated at the end of a line, on the other hand, is not manifestly obviously a error.

0: That I wrote, because of bugs other than this one in bash et al, such as $FILE_WITH_SPACES; not just "my shell that I use".
Raises hand

Just their (reasonably detailed) documentation, though; I didn't do anything productive with either project. Also Ext JS, a descendant of YUI.
Statistics also has formulas...

This is the problem with MWI gospel, people come and say that it solves all the math but it leaves gaping holes like this. And you didn't even solve the randomness, since as you say it is "statistical", although that is just a theory we currently have no formula for this.

Calling it a wave function collapse is much more honest since it accurately describes the situation, that we have no clue at what it is, why or when it happens. All we know how to do is calculate what possibly happens when we know that a wave function collapse will happen in a certain way.
I’d be worried he start pulling in the Twitter management style and do poorly considered large scale changes on a whim.
Basically: if he’s an obvious liability at Twitter, can he be the safe bet at Tesla? And can a man really be expected to be CEO of two large companies (not to mention three or more)? I’d not go anywhere near an instrument whose value depends on someone who has suddenly become extremely erratic. I think that’s the reason for the drop more than anything else. Shareholders are doubting Musk already.
I think it's because of a sense of ownership and belonging (or lack thereof). People who made the art in Lascaux are, in a distant sense, ancestors of the present-day French. Most of Australia is of British ancestry, transplanted in the past few hundred years. The majority of them, including their government, obviously don't consider the Aboriginal heritage as their own.
Clinical Effects of Regular Dry Sauna Bathing: A Systematic Review (2018)
Leningrad to be precise. And it’s hardly a peripheral city.
Trump tax returns to be released by U.S. House panel on Friday
And Restic just got the ability to rewrite snapshots, i.e. retroactively remove material added to backup.
There is also something to be said for too many optional features making a mess out of ecosystem
>she

Just use “they” instead of hamfisting gender equality. Which ironically you do in your first paragraph.
Just as a PSA in case not everyone knows this new feature.

In the US and a growing number of other countries, the latest iPhones have a satellite network for emergencies.

If tech giants are going to spend money on something cool, might as well use it.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213426
A key concept in biochemistry/chemistry is that almost all reactions are in some equilibrium between products and reactants, even H2O itself
> say 2 different languages so idiosyncrasies don't leak into design

Preferably, two different idiosyncratic languages. I vote Prolog and Snap! (BYOB). If you pick C and D, you'll get basically the same idiosyncrasies leaking in from both languages.
I just saw a number that valued SpaceX at $180+B on a secondary. I don't think the IPO market is ready for that right now
This seems more like a reversion to sane valuations. Peak market cap exceeded Toyota + GM combined, completely decoupled from Tesla's economic realities
Yes, 1P uses a random key additionally to the master key, like you described. That's the one 1P asks you to print out and hide somewhere, and which you also need when opening a vault on a new device. I don't know what LP does, but here are some notable things I gathered from the 1P whitepaper:

- 1P has a multi-layered approach: The master key + random key (+ salts) decrypt the user's private key, which in turn is used to decrypt the vault key (because the user's public key was used to encrypt the vault key). The vault key is used to decrypt the vault's items (each individually). Giving a new member access to a vault is done by encrypting the vault key with that member's public key. (I guess that's the same for LP)

- 1P encrypts all field contents. BTW metadata (e.g. URIs) and content fields are encrypted separately, such that the former can be decrypted faster for UI and search purposes.

- 1P uses the Secure Remote Password protocol, which allows clients to authenticate with the 1P server without ever sending the actual password. Instead, during account creation, a derived key ("v") is sent from the client to the server that will be used to generate a shared secret during every authentication (without sending "v" again). "v" has been salted with the user's email address. So, by arriving at the same shared secret as the client, the server can be sure of three facts: 1) The user entered the correct master key, 2) the user's device has the correct random key in store, and 3) the user's given email matches the email that was defined when creating the vault. In the paper they write that this authentication process is actually the reason why 1P requires a random key in addition to the master key: It's impossible to brute-force the master key even if an attacker gains access to "v".

- Vault recovery with 1P prevents the team "admin" from receiving the recovered vault's data (they do learn the vault key though, that's a necessity).

- 1P are constantly evaluating whether stronger encryption schemes (e.g. elliptic curve, or, further out, post quantum crypto) need to be implemented, and if such an update happens, they have already mapped out how vaults are upgraded. I think they increased PBKDF2 passes from 10k to 100k without breaking anything. IMO a higher pass count would be better, but that would make for a quite slow UI.
I highly doubt this is true due my deep understanding of Mormon culture and their ethical inclinations. You are spreading second hand gossip and casting an entire religion into disrepute.

Please share facts or reliable reporting if you have such.
I bend all my cables and it’s all my fault. I put my laptop on a pillow or drop it.

It happens to all the brands.
I'm not sure but I think the DoD has a budget of over $900 billion.

I guess they can finance the acquisition by transferring the debt to the company itself (probably an LBO?).

The teams are great, so it would be a matter of keeping the operational teams and the board the way they are, a separate entity, etc.

I see SpaceX as a very strategic company that can benefit everyone (hence the push for public ownership).
The GitHub ticket hints that support for cloud storage backends (s3) might come in a future release:

as you see above, there is already a huge scope of what should be done.
to not grow the scope even further, some stuff shall not be done (now):
* no new locking system
* no public key cryptography (neither by gpg nor by reinventing gpg for borg)
* not adding cloud storage backends (like s3)

https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/issues/6602
The last three months were a severe anomaly when looking at the last two years.

The good news is that this rate of descent can't be maintained for much longer.
Yeah, in the United States as well pretty horrific things were happening right up to the 1970s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Syphilis_Study

(I'm of course not saying that bad things stopped happening after the 1970s)
Thanks!
There's one big energy market operator in Australia, they publish heaps of data but it's a pain to process [0][1].

I'm no expert in US energy... Presumably each of your (many) markets will have different available data, but more-or-less equivalent. Probably do-able, but will need to be re-done several times over!

[0] https://nemweb.com.au/Reports/Current/
[1] https://aemo.com.au/energy-systems/electricity/national-elec...
I know this is the article's title, and that this may sound as a tangent, but whoever destroyed the cave drawings were definitely not Vandals:

> The Vandals were a Germanic people who first inhabited what is now southern Poland. They established Vandal kingdoms on the Iberian Peninsula, Mediterranean islands, and North Africa in the fifth century.

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandals
Shifting the burden of proof wasn't the only change. They also retroactively shifted the burden of record-keeping, and removed the presumption of clerical error when they started automatically punishing people for being suspect.
U.S. charges fraud in Mango crypto manipulation case
It looks like you're more of a glass-half-empty person (and me a glass-half-full). I agree with your current assessment of how good or bad fsd beta 10.69.x.x is. However, as I see it, the rate of improvement is such that FSD will reach L3 autonomy in 2 years (and requiring one hardware update).

Especially because perception, which I guessed would be the hardest part to solve due to lack of LIDAR, seems to be pretty good already, it's the planning that's bad.