skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The political talking points are unfortunately not that sophisticated. It’s largely about how twitter is run by a cabal of SJWs silencing the freedom to post Hunter Biden’s dick pics or fantasies about the liberals who will throw a tantrum if you say their pronouns wrong.
I know people with relatives that died in the Holodomor. Wow, just wow.
Important to read the modern re-examination which suggests it was a quite small in-group which was involved, not the entire economy.
Health: 7 to 8 hours of sleep a night / 30 minutes of exercise 5 days a week / Plan meals for the week / Give myself more respect and credit.

Tech: I’ve been a generalist software engineer for 8 years and want to dive deep into a particular topic. Still trying things out to see what sticks. It’s probably difficult to suggest things without knowing me but I’m very open to suggestions!

Career: Focus more during work hours and work less.

Misc: Find an OSS project that’s fun to contribute to or start one.

I used to make these big goals and have never completed them. I think this is list is doable for me since I’ve been doing it already.
There are whole countries that don't have tipping yet somehow seem to manage to serve food.
Reddit is also transitioning away to Go, and Netflix is not a Python shop, they're far more Java with some Node.
Polars is adding that feature itself. You probably just have to wait a couple weeks
How is smoking a social habit? I see people stepping away from groups to go smoke elsewhere.
A OneNote document on Castro's work laptop called "OfficeSpace Project" was found through the investigation, and in it, a "scheme to steal shipping fees," was outlined, according to the report.

Castro was contacted by police and arrested on June 21. On that date he spoke with detectives after being read his rights. During that interview he "confirmed that he named his scheme to steal from Zulily after the movie," police said.

Castro also told authorities he placed orders for over 1,000 items that were shipped to his house, and that they were part of a "testing process that Zulily was aware about, but he claimed that there was a script that was to be run shortly thereafter that would essentially cancel the order and ensure the orders did not process," the report said.

"When asked why he never returned the items to Zulily, he said that once they fired him, his opinion was, 'F__k 'em,'" the report said.

That was great! 8-)
Ironic the OP wants a blameless post mortem culture.
But also wants to blame and fire.

The better way is: we’re doing post mortems. Starting here. Anything that doesn’t work gets tossed. Anyone who resists beneficial change without good reason goes too. (Forward looking, results oriented)

I’m also curious what specific thing happened that caused the crew scheduling system to fail. We’ve heard a lot about the hell of trying to schedule by hand, but the COO in his statement seemed to indicate that they had to schedule by hand because the software simply didn’t have the features required to handle the cold start scenario.

If it just crashed because it was out of ram or disk or had old dependencies that’s an entirely different thing.

Overall I don’t see anything of substance in the post. Specifics or GTFO.
Something went wrong in the US after 911. I don’t think it’s just the government. The entire capitalist machine realised just how profitable fear can be, and that’s been one of the big marketing angles in the 2000s. Especially in media, but elsewhere like supplements and drugs too.

But the society wide impact of that has been a much more fearful people, obviously making parents more protective too.
You realize that absent this, you still have the issue of not getting your food? If there are more people wanting deliveries than there are drivers, you'll still be left waiting. This merely gives you more options (eg. "delivery within 10 minutes for $15, delivery within 60 minutes for $5), compared to the alternative of the platform trying to make a one-size-fits-all price for everyone (eg. some sort of surge pricing system).
> What is missing from your comment is the wealthy get that way by creating wealth, not by taking it from others. (This is why the economy grows - wealth creation.)

Wealthy people accumulate wealth by many means. Creating wealth is only one of those means. Nor is wealth creation incompatible with the model I described.

> The government, on the other hand, gets money by taking it.

Who said anything about the government?

But if you want to argue that point, the government may create wealth just like any private individual or enterprise. In fact, it does create quite a lot of wealth, in the form of public services and overcoming various incentive problems of private industry operating in free markets.

Of course, governments do levy taxes in order to fund their activities. But you can't seriously argue that tax revenue is "taken" from the economy and also argue that wealth accumulation does not exist because wealthy individuals' money is not "taken" from the economy.
You clearly do not understand the role or purpose of a union. Your use of “every” is incorrect.
The time = money equation doesn't really work for my situation. I get a fixed amount of money every month, no matter how hard I work or don't work. I am picking up eggs and milk at Walmart anyways, so sure it's worth my time. Especially if I get to see the same faces every once in awhile. While they may not be paid the best, I'll take a smiling local face over a distant chatbot any day of the week.

As to your example, buying printer paper online, this invariable leads to my box of printer paper being smashed by Amazon's delivery people (probably b/c they are paid like crap), and I have to return it - costing more than an hour + my frustration. So instead, I can drop by Walmart, pick up eggs and milk - and squeeze my tomatoes to make sure they aren't mush - look at my lettuce to check for slime, pick up a box of printer paper and drop off my return/exchange.

Also, Target, Office Depot, Home Depot, Lowe's and Costco have great customer service compared to Amazon too. Walmart just has 3rd party sellers that other store don't offer - so Walmart is getting more of my online orders lately.
Cool! As I edited into my comment — I do think it could at be an interesting idea.
If my order doesn't get delivered, uber eats or door dash eat the cost... or I get refunded and their metrics go down. Feels like punishing them for their bad economics.
Like GP, I was also confused. I think this is because HN links to a comment featuring a streetview photograph. Until I saw your comment, I didn't really notice that the article should have been linked to the very first post in the thread, which does clarify the question.
There was also an XT 286. 286 processor, 8-bit bus from the PC as opposed to the AT's 16-bit bus.

https://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?appname=skmw...
> You're letting the market figure out the right price for delivery service at any given moment

No, you aren’t, because there is no clear signal to the buyer about acceptable price (except, the outright fraudulent, if one accepts that the tip is actually part of the delivery charge, membership + delivery free charged by the intermediary).

> It strengthens the case for DSPs treating their delivery workers as contractors, because the price isn't set by the DSP.

Unless you are a shareholder of the DSP, this isn’t a benefit.
For most web-based things, frontend and backend, Typescript is where the zeitgeist is these days. Better types, web native, more performant, better async support, better library ecosystem, new cutting edge tech projects, etc. Python's forte and niche is in ML and scientific computing. For quick scripts, either are fine.
That is pretty funny now that you mentioned it.
There won't be an exact replacement because the circumstances that led to the community cannot (or rather, should not) be replicated. For the sake of the survival of the planet/species, I also don't think any institution based around magical thinking should fill the gap.

Keep in mind that high-demand religions require a huge investment of time and money. Devoting even just a fraction of those resources to hobbies, art classes, and/or other local activities tends to yield much better social results. While this might not perfectly fill the gap, neither did the religion, which is why people are leaving it.
It's not conspiracy to say that the ultra-rich use and abuse their wealth to work to tilt the system further in their favor.

Many people make the mistake of thinking that "many people with a common characteristic working in ways that mutually benefit the whole group" is necessarily a conspiracy. Sometimes it is, sure, but very rarely. It's much, much more common for members of a group—like, say, the very wealthy—to individually recognize "hey, if I do X, it makes things better for me!"

That's what happens with massive wealth inequality.
Significantly contributing to climate change? Nonsense. The US petrodollar has single handedly caused climate change. The greed of the upper class and their alignment with the middle east has caused climate change.

How anyone could believe a digital token of value, a keypair, and voluntary usage of energy to participate in a decentralized network could possibly be a major contributing factor in climate change, while shipping barges and oil rigs are in full operation, is beyond me. A part of me wish I was capable of such levels of delusion.
Sounds a bit like FLW too… amazing design gbs to look at, but by many reports fairly miserable to live in.
I've been using https://obsidian.md/canvas . Canvas graphs are described by an open spec but Obsidian isn't open source. Would be cool if TreeSheets can show Canvas graphs.
the problem here is none of that is actually connected to what a person needs. "Living Wage" Laws are just a different way to implement minimum wages, none of the laws shown on that page are connected to any kind of structure or process by which things needed to "live" like food, housing etc are tabulated where by a wage is set.

it is just a arbitrary wage picked by legislatures exactly like a "minimum wage" law only the "living wage" seems to apply to older people, where "minimum wage" laws apply to everyone. For example a 20yo in the UK can make "minimum wage" but a 24yo will need to make "living wage" both of which are just numbers pulled out of thin air, not connected to "the amount of money you need to support yourself. "
The base level staff often aren't allowed discretion to do more than "computer says no".
The idea was, other airlines were soulless automata that didn't care about you, but SW could be personable because they were small and perky. That's all gone now.
Yes, just keep enough in Bank A to cover the bills, and any extra gets sent to Bank B, which account number is never given to anyone (other than Bank A).
It fits well with the general American mythos of self development by staking out alone into the unknown to seek your fortune (not necessarily a literal one) - whether that be out west, into the factories of the city, the natural resource rich boom towns, or overseas in foreign war. It is as if you're not really "doing it right" if you come into it too prepared.
With industrial and medical equipment, it falls into the category of strict liability.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/products_liability

https://www.biren.com/blog/2020/september/defective-machiner...

> For the latter, California law provides options to Plaintiffs who pursue products claims against manufacturers, distributors, and others responsible for a defective product. These claims may allege:

> Design defects, which can include a lack of adequate safety devices (i.e. machine guarding, shut-off valves, etc.) or other potential hazards in a product’s design that a manufacturer could and should have known would increase the risk of foreseeable harm.

If it is foreseeable that "here's the source code to the industrial refrigerator controller" that someone might alter it and update it, then the manufacturer will have a harder time not being liable.

Similarly, "here's the spinal nerve stimulation controller" may be risky to have people get the source code to to modify on their own.

---

If you modify your car, and its not a design defect and something breaks, that's on you.

If you remove a throttle on the computer's CPU and melt the solder, that's on.

If you can reprogram a controller on an industrial device - that's on the manufacturer always.

Industrial and medical equipment falls in a different category for product liability than consumer devices.

> The Court’s ruling in Demara means the consumer expectation test may effectively be used to demonstrate the inappropriateness of a design for a broad range of products – even those which perform highly complex tasks in industrial settings – and hold manufacturers to higher standards.

Note that the manufacturer of an industrial or medical device is held to a higher standard of "not letting the customer do the wrong thing with it."

The issue is that at the end of the day, the manufacturer of industrial and medical equipment is liable for damages unless they take every possible foreseeable precaution to prevent the user of the device from inadvertently causing harm to themselves or others. That liability extends through resellers, rentals, and 3rd parties.
Then why was I downvoted? Kink shaming is not cool :/
All of those examples should be able to afford the basics off their wage. An apartment that isn’t three hours from work or requiring hot beds, transportation, food, healthcare, etc.

Yes, it gets complicated, but “$7.25/hr isn’t enough” is not complicated.
That’s the easiest proposition ever.

Do you want to be the entity that enabled my wife and I to have an all weekend sexathon, with the piece of mind that there’s no surprise baby coming? Or do you want the be the entity that cock-blocked me by sticking us with the condoms she doesn’t like?

It’s worth more than the value of the product to be the vendor that got me laid.

Companies like Amazon are making bad customer decisions like this because their growth trajectory is falling and they didn’t see it coming. So they are stuck with stupid capital investments and with running their own version of the post office that they don’t really need.

So now the MBA idiots assume that I’m some sort of criminal scamming them out of condoms. (All the while operating the largest carnival of grift ever devised via FBA) Whatever, I’ll go to CVS and deal with the inconvenience and awful shopping experience rather than risk being stuck with a product I don’t like.
Not defending cancel culture. But those who are complaining about it would be more credible if they didn’t themselves try to keep marginalized groups down themselves. Example: pretty much any opinion host on Fox News.
> Covid appeared on the Wuhan institute of virologies doorstep, with exactly the modification proposed in their grants. You would think this would be their time to shine but where was their help?

Where indeed. What a crazy coincidence that they were proposing to edit the the furin cleavage site on the coronavirus's spike protein, and several months later a coronavirus emerged at that location with a novel furin cleavage site on its spike protein.

They should have been in a better position to help than anybody else, but perhaps their efforts were instead focused on distancing themselves from it. For some reason.
Part of the slowness of the cashier lines is based on the business deciding that delay is acceptable when deciding how many lines to open
I wonder how much of this is just what we're seeing online. As we all know, a relatively small number of people post anything publicly.
I thought they’re both terminal degrees with legal power over others?

He was most certainly physically inside one at points ;-)

Edit: I guess a form of a joke, but more of a funny fact
It’s increasingly become pretty reliable for me very recently, what kind of bugs are you experiencing that are stopping you from healing the jump?
> Something went wrong in the US after 911.

Well before then. I got one of the last chemistry sets around 1970, when they were all emasculated.

> The entire capitalist machine realised just how profitable fear can be

Oh come on. A huge driver of this problem is the legal system which encourages jackpot lawsuits, along with our culture of it's always someone else's fault (usually the party with money that becomes worthwhile to sue).
A number of years ago, Tracfone realised it _would_ be a good thing for customers to be able to automatic'ly extend their end-of-service date rather than having to remember to buying airtime minutes they don't need (due to already having lots of unused minutes) just to prevent getting their number suspended.

Tracfone also decided it should be possible to activate this feature using just your phone number and a credit card, without having to sign into the website. There wasn't even a way for customers to sign into anything!

Years later, they added a possibility of customers signing into an online account. But doing so did not give access to payment information enter in the old no-sign-in system. The call-in help number's menu system also got changed sometime, such that it was no longer possible to talk to a person — all permutations of the menu tree, as well as fallbacks like "just press zero a few times" resulted in loops.The mandated contact number for the vendor on credit card bills also went to this menu system.

The end result was that the only way to modify or cancel a recurring payment created under the old no-sign-in system seemed to be telling the credit card company to either refuse charges from Tracfone or to close the revolving account. Doing so would cause Tracfone to cancel your service (which might not be what either you or Tracfone wanted).

And after they cancelled? The remnants of Tracfone automation would do two things: send your now-disabled phone occasional messages trying to entice you back, and keep submitting charges to the credit card company to be rejected. When the credit card's refuse-charges instruction expired after five years, Tracfone would resume taking payment, for a now unrecoverable (already reassigned) phone number, for an IMEI that had not appeared any network for years.

On the upside, I know somebody who has no problems with current Tracfone.
Another similar notion is with credit card payments for convenience items at bakeries, deli, and pizza restaurants. A company called "4shifts" is notorious for telling owners to place a sign on the register "a convenience charge of 3.5% will be added to the sale if you use a credit card". Add the 3.5% plus sales tax which increases the sale by 8% - 12% depending on the state you live in. 4shifts is also used in major stadium venues.
Thanks for sharing @jonbaer! I’m one of the co-founders of Roboflow. Some additional resources and context:

* Blog Post: https://blog.roboflow.com/roboflow-100/

* Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13523

* Github: https://github.com/roboflow-ai/roboflow-100-benchmark

At Roboflow, we've seen users fine-tune hundreds of thousands of computer vision models on custom datasets.

We observed that there's a huge disconnect between the types of tasks people are actually trying to perform in the wild and the types of datasets researchers are benchmarking their models on.

Datasets like MS COCO (with hundreds of thousands of images of common objects) are often used in research to compare models' performance, but then those models are used to find galaxies, look at microscope images, or detect manufacturing defects in the wild (often trained on small datasets containing only a few hundred examples). This leads to big discrepancies in models' stated and real-world performance.

We set out to tackle this problem by creating a new set of datasets that mirror many of the same types of challenges that models will face in the real world. We compiled 100 datasets from our community spanning a wide range of domains, subjects, and sizes.

We've benchmarked a couple of models (YOLOv5, YOLOv7, and GLIP) to start, but could use your help measuring the performance of others on this benchmark (check the GitHub for starter scripts showing how to pull the dataset, fine-tune models, and evaluate). We're very interested to learn which models do best in which real-world scenarios & to give researchers a new tool to make their models more useful for solving real-world problems.
The weather affected my holiday travels (not for Southwest.)

I sat at the gate behind 20 other people in line, waiting. I called the support number and tried to use the app while on hold.

The person on the phone managed to snipe a flight that put me home four hours later than my original plans, with a free, unsolicited upgrade to first class. The best the app showed me was a 48 hours delay. Nobody had showed up to help the line of people by the time I was off to find a comfortable seat.

I usually dislike talking to people. When it comes to stressful situations or customizations that aren't cheap (think cars or dining out,) a living, breathing professional is going to be much more useful than an inherently limited screen.
This seems to echo and reinforce a point in the article. The apps aren’t replacing the delivery person they’re replacing the logistics management with you the consumer and letting you be mad at yourself, the driver, the restaurant, and the app in some set of proportions when net the balance of ire should fall on the app for the state of affairs.
One significant disadvantage of PySpark is its reliance on py4j to serialize and deserialize objects between Java and Python when using Python UDFs. This constant overhead can become burdensome as data volume increases in such an exchange. However, I am glad to see efforts to create a data pipeline framework using Python and Ray.

~One suggestion, a Scala/Java Spark run of those benchmarks should be a valid baseline to compare against as well instead of PySpark.~
Ah it's SparkSQL so the execution probably wouldn't have much of py4j involvement, except for the collect.
According to web archive, it happened somewhere between October and mid-November:
The last time it was up: https://web.archive.org/web/20221021050048/https://www.storj...
The first time it's gone: https://web.archive.org/web/20221114070255/https://www.storj...
I think it's a false dichotomy. Delayed ACK and Nagle's algorithm each improve the network in different ways, but Nagle's specifically allows applications to be written without knowledge of the underlying network socket's characteristics.

But there's another way, a third path not taken: Nagle's algorithm plus a syscall (such as fsync()) to immediately clear the buffer.

I believe virtually all web applications - and RPC frameworks - would benefit from this over setting TCP_NODELAY.

It would also be more elegant than TCP_CORK, which has a tremendous pitfall: failing to uncork can result in never sending the last packet. And it's easy to implement by adding a syscall at the end of each request and response. Applications almost always know when they're done writing to a stream.