skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The kernel has to buffer everything you send in a sliding window, to retry missed acks. Userspace buffering only reduces syscalls.

A lot of people with strong preferences about segment boundaries and timing are arguing with TCP and probably shouldn’t be using it.
Why oh why write a study on twitter, oh why?!
There are much more fitting mediums for that. I refuse to read it this way.
Would you release the next Marvell movie on TikTok or a book in text messages? Grrr.
I think the S still looks amazing. True about all the other models (including the one I own….)
Sorry I’m not tech savvy! How is this different from Tor?
I did the exact same thing in a freshman engineering course although the wording of my message was slightly different. My message wound up being displayed on the classroom projector. The Professor (former marine) dispatched the TAs to find the computer it came from. Each computer in the classroom was clearly labelled with an ID so it did not take them long.
I don't know Golang, but how does the function in git-lfs that writes to the socket look like? Is it writing in 50-byte chunks? Why?

Because I guess even with TCP_NODELAY, if I submit reasonably huge chunks of data (e.g. 4K, 64K...) to the socket, they will get split into reasonably-sized packets.
This very lightweight article doesn't touch on why Popper and Kuhn were so influential (although I'm partial to Imre Lakatos, who tried to rescue Popper from Kuhn). If you aren't familiar with the Logical Positivists and their approach to science, it's valuable background to understanding the debates.

The article shows that the West has not really come to terms with rejecting divine revelation and the end of absolute certainty. Some personalities seem more drawn to "facts" than others, probably the same ones that are drawn to authoritarianism (of whatever flavor). I doubt people with high openness (in the OCEAN / Big Five sense) really clamor for FACTS.
Trader risk meeting in Assyria, basically
Sweet, thanks dang :)
It does indeed, there are many options to choose from when you start up TeXmacs.
From what I can tell, it seems to be a variation of `tmmanual` which can be found under: Focus>Styles>Documentation>TeXmacs>tmmanual.

Hope this helps.
I see. What are you trying to accomplish with this debate? Is it to prove to others that you're right, to change their minds, to test your own ideas, or what?
> Elon’s Twitter posts have zero impact on anything related to the car.

Elon’s personal brand has been a big part of Tesla’s appeal, it either falling overall or realigning to be most attractive to a group not otherwise inclined to prefer electric vehicles is going to have an impact on Tesla demand, whether or not it logically should, just as it (positively) impacted that demand, whether or not it should have, before.

> The people allowing that to shape their purchasing decisions are underdeveloped emotional children.

You calling people “underdeveloped emotional children” doesn’t reduce the actual number of them or the effect their preferences have on the market for the car.

> Adults buy a vehicle based on specs, price, build quality, and style.

Cars remain on the road typically for over a decade now, and Tesla takes unusual steps to force use of their own services for maintenance; purely tangential image issues (which nevertheless are real market forces) aside, this creates a rational reason for Tesla demand to be more than usually sensitive to ability to trust the company and its leadership into the future.
That's why you read the comments :) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34179449
They absolutely claimed it was good for the enslaved person as part of justifying it.
It's actually relatively complete but it's a lead for the full, pay-walled article.
I would humbly suggest that the real threat of ReDos vulnerabilities isn't so much the denial of service itself, but the human resources that are consumed investigating and responding to what may appear to be random failures on the affected properties.

For instance, imagine that an attacker has two vulnerabilities ready to unleash on a target, one of them a ReDos and the other an RCE. The ReDos could conceivably provide cover by causing minor mischief while the real attack goes unnoticed.
This…is a fantastic product idea. Merging the Reddit/hacker news temporal ranked feed concept with personal profiles.
I agree- cry it out sleep training is ideal for infants and parents.
I said the company, not engineers. And macbooks are used as chromebooks, I haven't used anything outside of Chrome/term. the dev environment is glinux. osx/m1 is not supported without getting exceptions and not worth the trouble.
I disagree! Cry it out is the worst way!
I'm lost, people who seek out flu vaccines are a unique population?
Getting to the final and winning the WC is very difficult, and will be even more so with 48 teams. France could've gone home earlier at many points, same as Argentina.

Even getting to PKs was partly luck. That handball penalty could've easily not happened or not been called.

While it's likely France will be a contender for the next decade or so, there's no guarantee of them making into to the final and winning. Plenty of stacked teams have gone home early before (even in this WC).
That font emulation implementation is pretty wild, thanks: https://www.texmacs.org/joris/fontart/fontart.html#poor-man-...
This is so incredibly wrong I have to comment.
Most people's leases roll over into month-to-month. You can easily add clauses to say it goes on for an unlimited time until someone revokes.
Constantly increasing the price will price out more and more potential customers.

I think it would work better if they added ads and other forms of revenue so they can lower the price.
Every language that's been around long enough has issues. Python has its own of course, and the ones the OP listed are real. But none of them are show-stoppers or as big a deal as to stop coding in Python.

Here is my take on what the OP is actually trying to say: "I don't want to code in Python any more (because there are newer cooler languages like Go?) and here is my list of reasons for rationalizing my rather irrational decision"
Seems like something I’d really like, but when I went looking at the demos and docs it was spitting lots of errors on Safari

Example: https://ellx.io/ellx-hub/lib
EndBASIC 0.10: Core language, evolved
I was part of an acquisition where a little less than one floor of of a five floor building stayed employed.

But the cleaning service still did their job.

My lunches at the old CEOs desk (lunch stored in his fridge) with access to his office bar … and trips to his bathroom were glorious!

I also moved a number of company awards (since abandoned by laid off employees) and plaques to my tiny cubicle. The new CEO was actually impressed by all my awards (not my intention…).
Just wait until your enemies spin up public perceptions of your witch-hood.
"In the US."
Not in California. Google B&P 17200.
IPv6 has enough bits to uniquely identify everything if you wanted but that does not mean it's structured and deployed in a way that makes it actually so just like your computer using 64 bit addresses does not mean programs should expect 18 exabytes of physical RAM instead of any other use or future-proofing of the address space. Beyond that I'm not sure I follow the "obvious conclusion" further or immediate rush to dishonesty as the explanation.
I hear ya, but think it’s the media medium targeted at that audience. A TikTok version would appeal to younger people, which I think would be a great thing!
Google's interview level is set to not needing to fire too many bad people, it's not about being superior (err on the side of caution when hiring).

This might change now in this downturn, but when I was working at Google in 2008, we were the only tech company where nobody was fired because of the recession (there were offices closed, and people had the option to relocate, although not everybody took that option).

If you compare it with Facebook, they just fired a lot of people.

In short: you probably just didn't have luck, you should try again when you can.
I've written a bit about DNSSEC. Adoption is only around 1-5%, deployment is a footgun [1], and validation currently imposes significant performance penalties [2], although that could be improved.

I've also written about performance of DNS over TLS [3] and found it to be negligible. The TLS setup is only done infrequently.

[1] https://ianix.com/pub/dnssec-outages.html
[2] https://cyounkins.medium.com/costs-and-benefits-of-local-dns...
[3] https://cyounkins.medium.com/performance-of-dns-over-tls-4f4...
That's really down to your personal ethics and how much you are willing to tolerate.

As you're not distributing it, the chance of someone coming after you for downloading a non-legal copy is almost non-existent, and pretty much 0 if you've taken some basic precautions.

It sounds like you've answered your own question there; that as you'd read the majority of the book, that there's no real loss to you finishing it for free.
> Pelé is not seen as a great person in Brazil, from my perspective

Your perspective is not the same of lots of sportswomen/men, public figures, traditional/web media outlets and a crowd of anonymous people praising him right now.

I wish brazilians would be less demanding with our idols.
Freenet is slightly older and doesn’t route internet traffic, just distributed static sites.
I usually just ask for their credit card numbers if privacy is so unimportant.
A side-effect of this will be web servers that won't allow scraping because your non-browser HTTP client won't have the same features that browsers have that also aid in profiling users for advertising.

We're already at a point where scraping can be hard without a full-fledged JS engine, a move towards feature detection will mean that you're going to have to use a browser that servers can easily fingerprint for ad targeting if you want to scrape data.

Chrome already deprecated UA strings 3 years ago. Google uses browser fingerprinting to detect if you're using Chrome so they can send you to working versions of their products, instead of the versions they send to other browsers that don't work as well.

I can see browsers being excluded if they aren't of the 'blessed' variety that either follows Chrome's implementation, or if they don't have features that advertisers want that allow for easy user identification/tracking/fingerprinting/etc.
Testing Shoes That Make You Walk 250% Faster | WIRED
Based on your comment I did a more thorough search and found this:

Answer to If a keyless ignition car is left running, can it be driven away without the key? by Sean Graham

https://www.quora.com/If-a-keyless-ignition-car-is-left-runn...
Those in glass houses...
> Fats in products were gradually replaced with sugars

Let's experiment with that statement. Perhaps what I'm hypothesizing here is new, perhaps it isn't.

Don't take this as a position to argue with. I really don't have a dog in this fight.

Suppose that people have always been after a certain feeling of fullness, and this feeling is largely a product of evolution. It's also very emotion-driven, not purely physical.

When humans feel full, they stop eating. Of course it doesn't work perfectly, since we've always had fat people. It does happen to work for me and my extended family, since none of us have ever been obese.

Suppose that animal fats, being highly calorie-dense, give a feeling both of being full and being emotionally satisfying. Every chef will tell you that people love fat.

Now, if the food industry and nutrition scientists removed a lot of the animal fats, then both people's physical and emotional needs increased, and many searched for sugars and carbs to compensate. They are a poor substitute, though.

If this were true, then humans are getting more calories than they were when animal fats were a bigger part of the diet. It's not that animal fats are good for you as much as "if you don't consume them, you'll consume other things that are even worse."

Of course this is not a single factor to explain it all. A more sedentary lifestyle is also a big, big part of it.
It's not that Cloudflare volunteers to protect someone's web site form voracious bots. It's a choice made, and often paid for, by the site's owner.

So the site owner deliberately accepts that some small percentage of users won't be able to access the site. It may be a reasonable price to pay fr protection against a DoS attack, when no users can access the site anyway.
The package management riff is a fair cop.

It would be swell if rationalizing the packaging story were a priority for 3.12.
Exactly, especially when you announce it to your subjects in large heavily incensed halls.
I did the same in middle school. Thankfully my message was just the letter q and not something offensive.
Relatedly there was a previous HN post and discussion about Delayed ACKs and TCP_NODELAY where John Nagle himself chimed in:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10608356
I have to say their own homepage does not inspire confidence - it currently shows three sample search results, and clicking on the first, "best headphones" has quietheadphones.com, a parked domain, as the fourth result. For comparison DDG shows a bunch of headphone review sites, all of which seems reasonably reputable.

In fact all three of these have some odd results -

- "steve jobs"'s fifth result is a YouTube video of Steve Jobs at a 2003 conference, but the result is linked to a seemingly random 2606s timestamp and it is right below the Videos section with much more relevant videos
- "python exceptions"'s second result is a blog post about Python exceptions being anti-patterns. I've not used Python in a while but that seems very wrong, and a terrible result to show to someone who might be learning Python or looking up how Exceptions work.
I think the OP just made a fly-by comment using very imprecise language. Most people assume drug exclusivity works through patents without giving generics with expired patents (like HCQ) much thought.

They wouldn't need to modify it for exclusivity via Abbreviated New Drug Application - I just don't see the FDA accepting any evidence short of a phase III clinical trial that HCQ helps with Alzheimers to fulfill the new use requirements. At best they'd be able to run a proper clinical trial for some cocktail of generic drugs and use ANDAs to prevent competitors from using those generics in their own cocktail for a few years.
I did read that. The format he had wasn't really locked down, it was just a regular epub behind a crappy web-based viewer. The library epub downloads really do have DRM locks.
That just sounds like a browser bug though. Client side code shouldn't try to work around it, the website should just notify all users that Chrome is broken and won't play audio properly
Check out Nashille’s library! They even have a teen-focused makerspace, with 3D printers, a music studio, rentable Ardurino kits. Check it out - inspiring.

https://www.library.nashville.org/

PS: +1 to Austin’s library. It’s an incredible space. Grab a coffee at the cafe, and hang out on the beautiful roof terrace. Breathtaking views, and it’s a great place to meet people (and what better people to meet than library people!); PS: they are building a makerspace there too - stay tuned…
What does this mean? Could someone please clarify what this prose / poem means or what is the author's intention? Going completely over my head.
Yeah, corners within those corners, more accurately.
They aren't equivalent but they can do the task in question:

with prompt_password() as password:
stuff

Once the scope exits, the context manager can scramble the memory.
In my experience, you usually don't want to be Nagling in code that lives in a datacenter. Go's default is likely set up around that idea.
like, two quarts of (sugar free) strong tonic water a day.
Thanks for that vote of support, I haven't ever seen such an idiotic response to an innocent remark on HN before. I'm still confused about it, it's as if people read the first 4 words and not the rest of my comment and then decided to have a pile on orgy.
This exact argument can be used to justify both POV.

No one is entitled to have any particular piece of media available to them for free, either?

Talented and savvy consumers can find any number of ways to make money to pay for media, like 99.9% of other consumers.
Freenet is known for child abuse content, a topic so sensitive and disturbing people don’t want to even refer to it directly.
Because of this post I looked up how I disable Nagle's algorithm on Windows. I've now done it (according to the instructions at least). Let's see how it goes. I'm in central Europe on gigabit ethernet and fiber, with more than 50% of my traffic going over IPv6 and most European sites under 10ms away.
> Yet strangely, the word “buy” is used in the Kindle store.

You can buy a license with specific terms, including termination conditions. This…long predates digital anything.
My circle of friends shrunk some during the pandemic and after the vaccines came out I put a lot of effort into building it up (larger than before). Some data in case helpful:

Friends made over 1 year, 3 months:

Meetup - 1 friend. Had a poor time-to-friend ratio for what I put in, but that's an n=1 and I mostly frequented just one meetup, although I tried like 3. Negative experience overall (for me, ymmv). Friend is great.

Local discord group around a hobby of interest - 2 friends. Many friendly acquaintances. Had to find the right group as a few I tried didn't feel like as-good fits. Positive experience, the friend making process was enjoyable and the friends are great.

Meeting at an intro class for another hobby (a semi social one - need at least one partner) - 2 friends. We were all new at the intro class and it was hard to find people, so we swapped numbers. Got to know each other through the hobby then became friends. Probably would be difficult to replicate intentionally.

Friends of Friends - 1 large group. 5 that I'd call friends and several more that I'd call group-friends or friendly acquaintances.

Friends of Friends are exponential. There's an excellent time to friend ratio, and the people you meet come pre-vetted. But note that some friends may be hesitant to make inter-friend connections even after they know you well, depending on how closed-off their other groups are. It's, of course, also not generally accessible until you have enough of a circle that like/trust you enough that you're getting invites to their other group things.
Stacked teams go home early all the time in WCs. France getting to the final again is an exception.

France went home early to Switzerland on penalties last year at the Euros (Mbappe missed a penalty!). That could happen again in 2026.
That is not accurate.

Santos was an above-average team before he arrived. Same as napoli with Maradona. They took average teams to new heights.

In contrast, Messi arrived to a top team, and CR7 the same, with Real Madrid.

Besides, South America before the 80's was a soccer powerhouse. Premiership didn't even exist, and the league was a backwater for fishermen journeymen and player-coaches. It took a lot of time for the color TV (and TV broadcasting in general) to get going and tilt the balance for Europe.

If you played exhibition games you played against south american teams, and usually in south america, to make any money and to see any quality.

Penarol, Estudiantes La Plata, and a few others, massaccred regularly all of the big names of today.

It was only when super south american players started migrating to europe because TV money arrived, that things changed.
Having been in that space at the time, I think this point is not arguable at all. Freenet was not the first decentralized file sharing system. Freenet might have been the subject of a PhD thesis in 1999, but by the time it became even slightly usable Napster and Gnutella already had substantial user bases. (Similar to Ceph BTW which had a long gap between being a PhD thesis and being an actual usable distributed filesystem, during which time others had existed in the wild for some time.) The "arguable" part is whether you could include eDonkey, GNUnet, and others in that list. What is true AFAIK is that Freenet was the first such system with things like censorship resistance as a primary design goal (though the MojoNation folks might even disagree with that) and a non-trivial user base.

In case anyone doesn't believe me, here's the Freenet thesis which actually mentions both Gnutella and Napster in references. Hard to claim precedence when that's the case.

https://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/egs/615/freenet.pdf
In basic terms, Tor is used to browse the Internet, while Freenet is used to browse Freenet. You can browse the Internet without Tor, but you cannot browse Freenet without Freenet.
Love when people take the time to know what they are talking about.. Vyvanse is a perfect example, they took a drug and made a prodrug.
There’s also https://endless.dog/.
Previous discussions in the last year:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29835756

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31584791

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32676993
> this should pose no problem.

It poses a stack of problems a foot high.

Some random examples:

Docker, Kubernetes, etc... use HTTP by default. Not HTTPS or HTTP/3. Unencrypted HTTP 1.1! This is because containers are snapshots and can't contain certificates. Injecting certificates is a pain in the butt, because there is no standardised mechanism for it.

Okay! You inserted a certificate! For... what name? Is it the "site host name", or the "server name"? Either one you pick will be wrong for something. Many web apps expect to see a host header on the backend that matches the frontend, and will poop themselves if you give them a per-machine (or per-container) certificate. I've seen cloud load balancers that have the opposite problem and expect valid per-machine certificates!

If you pick per-machine certificates, then by definition you have to man-in-the-middle, which breaks a handful of apps that require (and enforce!) end-to-end cryptography.

Okay, fine, you have Let's Encrypt issuing per-site certificates, automatically, via your public endpoint. Nothing could be easier! Right up until someone in secops says that you also need make the non-production sites have "private endpoints". Now, you need two distinct mechanisms for certificate issuance, one internal only, and one public. Double the fun.

It just goes on and on: You'll also likely have to deal with CDNs, API gateways, Lambda/Functions, S3 / blob accounts, legacy virtual machines, management endpoints, infrastructure consoles, and so on. Some of these have integrated issuance/renewal capability, some don't. Some break because of your DNS CAA records. Some don't. Some send notifications before expiry, some don't. And so forth...

As a random example, I recently had to deal with a GIS product that shall not be named that requires a HTTPS REST API to set or change its certificates. Yes. You heard me. HTTPS. To set a valid certificate, you first have to automate against a HTTPS endpoint with an invalid certificate, restart the service, do a multi-minute wait in a retry loop, and then continue the automation. Failure to handle any one of the dozen failure scenarios and corner cases will lead to a dead service that won't start at all. Fun stuff.

Automated certificate issuance for complex architectures is definitely not a solved problem in general.
There’s also .cat, .fish, and .dog, so why not.
There are plenty of services that won't serve you data, neither web app nor data from API calls, if you aren't running a JS engine.
Then how do you propose that creatives make a living? Come on, no dawdling!
MIT solved century-old differential eq. to break liquid AIs bottleneck
Tor gives you an anonymous connection to some server. Stuff that’s not linked to is still available to the server admin.

Freenet provides an anonymous, encrypted, and distributed cache that does not rely on the security of any one server. Stuff that’s not linked to could just as well not exist, because no one can access it.