skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I mean from a technological point of view sure, but that just shows how bad the design was(compared to what we know now). The falcon program shows that it’s obviously way more economical to just ditch the 2nd stage and reuse the booster. F9 launches cost sub 20 million and a shuttle launch costs on the order of a billion. Squabble over whatever details you want about performance or who had to do what R&D but F9 is clearly in a different league.
I imagine that someone who is good at that style of Java might enjoy the challenge of working on it, particularly if they are already familiar with the codebase.

There are a LOT of Java SWEs floating around...
Android as policy does not allow GPL software in userspace.

The MirBSD Korn shell, mksh, is used there as the system shell.

That footprint is huge.

Some utilities that I have used on Android bring a copy of Bash along, but it's not standard.

I also mentioned above that I do some shell scripting with Busybox-win64. I can't use arrays in the "bash" that it implements.

I've also worked on routers that use the Busybox shell, same problem.

Dash is also far smaller and advertised as 4x faster than Bash. Anything I write that targets dash will run on all the others, so this skill is quite useful.
They also do code contributions as well (porting various components of Blender to work on Metal)
Is it possible the behaviors and "ways of life" are inherently political?
They also lugged a large amount of extra dry mass into space because of the mass of the orbiter. The part that was least important to re-use and most expensive to re-use is the part that was re-used the most.
"What we know is but a drop. What we don't know is an ocean."

Humanity's constructs are both:

1) far too large to summarize in any one person's head

2) likely mostly (if not totally) incorrect

I start from a position of assuming that everything I know is wrong, I just don't know why yet. I'm taking in new information every day; from wikiscroll.blankenship.io, from hacker news, from conversations at the gym, etc.

Given:

1) How much there is to learn

2) How little time I've had to learn it and reconcile all of it

3) The number of foundational beliefs I hold

4) The rate of new information available to me from the internet

I don't think it's unreasonable to frequently come across new information incompatible with how I view the world. I don't shield my ego from that new information, I diligently think through how I'm incorrect and what that might mean about my world view.

I know I'm one of the few people in my social circles who do this, so it's definitely abnormal. Maybe this is mania? But, at least as of the current moment, I'd rather be manic about reevaluating my deeply held beliefs in light of new information than to shield my ego and hold onto those deeply held beliefs.
Same thing with the "lot of ideas" struggle. I usually put them down initially into a sms or google notes. Then transfer into Obsidian once I get back to a laptop.

Those files are massive man, most of the ideas are 10-50 words and the file for software ideas alone has almost 5000 words (so roughly 250 of {what I think are} good software ideas). It's been an accumulation of everything for the past 6-8 years and really just enforces the whole "Ideas are a dime a dozen" mantra.

I should really start taking action on a few of them though, it's happened once or twice already where someone has made one or two of them with great success and I've gotten pissed/depressed that I didn't pursue them before they did.
The reactionary right is more effective at online propaganda than the left, partly because internet culture was born out of the cesspools of SA and 4chan, and partly due to the cultural effect of having a President pushing the anti-leftist narrative across mainstream and social media. Witness what happened to "woke", "toxic masculinity" and "fake news" for example - their common meanings are now precisely the meanings the right uses to denigrate them, to the point that they are almost exclusively used by right-wingers in the pejorative, and are only useful as dog-whistles.
Mullvad Review of 2022
So that should make it easy to attribute, yes?
They weren't fully re-used as each shuttle booster ejected the engine nozzle right before impact with the water. Additionally, they had to be disassembled before re-filling with fuel. It was re-manufacturing versus re-use.
They probably mean using a code search engine to check all snippets. The simplest thing would be am n-gram filter. A more advanced approach would use a code similarity neural net. It's not principled attribution, just locating the most similar example in the training set.
Sure. You can substitute “white nationalist” for “any kind of reactionary, including white nationalist” in my previous comment, if you find that more palatable.
How would a blockchain ride-hailing system work for women - would it expect people to jump into any car with a driver who claims to own blockchain address X (with ratings from other addresses)?

The world looks quite different when a significant proportion of the population are significantly stronger than you - strong enough that you couldn't physically stop them doing horrible things to you.

Uber with random drivers is sketchy, but you know there's been at least minimal background checks, and knowing that Uber are tracking the ride gives a bit more safety.
Closure is not an anonymous function. It "encloses" variables that were in scope at the point of closure creation. Therefore function pointers cannot serve that purpose as is.
Or, since they have a package called @auth/sveltekit, it might have been better named @auth/next, @auth/next/providers/github, etc.
Blockchain Consensus Encyclopedia: More Than 84 Blockchain Consensus Explained
The token “if” appears in a heck of a lot of inputs, and a heck of a lot of outputs. What you’re describing seems like basically building an inverted index of the input corpus and then doing a search for the output. If the answer comes back with a high relevance then you consider it “traced”. I wonder what the size of that inverted index would be compared to the size of the generative model.
I worked at a small company for 7 years and had to work with databases, server management, product ownership, front-end/back-end, styling etc. With only 4 developers, we all were expected to do everything. I always thought this was normal expectation for a full-stack developer.

Then I switched jobs to a bigger organization and became surprised by the number of people who claim to be full-stack but are uncable of developing an application from nothning.
Invoices seem like a great idea. Becomes a business expense and can claim it off taxes. Essentially gov't kicks in whatever your tax rate is.
> Why is it bad if it pulls people to the reactionary?

Because, and to the extent, that the thing it pulls people toward is bad.

> We might as well say the glamorization of cosmopolitanism is a recruiting tool for neoliberalism.

That's less true, though, but, yes, glamorization of cosmopolitanism feeds a bunch of ideologies that are not the same ones the “trad... ” movement feeds.
The Illusion of Controls
FSD has dramatically improved over the last three to four months. I would be interested in seeing the trend on that metric with autopilot. For my own experience I’ve found my interventions on local street driving has reduced to zero or a small number per session (which is an easier metric for me to mentally track than per mile, which is subject to highway and straightaway driving skewing down - local street driving is insanely complex, especially in an urban area and doubly so in a randomly planned urban area like seattle)
https://archive.vn/4ZBOO
AI is inherently incompatible with the notion of private property as a result of the way it is "trained". It unintentionally exposes how much of our creativity, exploration, and innovation we've commodified.
Indeed. What I was trying to say was that police and criminal investigations have a reasonable amount of science to ascertain guilt. (Aside some of the junk science used: blood spatter analysis, lie detectors, etc).

Tarot can be mechanistic or intuitive. It's my belief that we don't yet have the science understand to explain how it does and doesn't work.

And NOBODY should be making public accusations based on a tarot reading. That's just ethically wrong to begin with, aside legal and civil damages caused.
I guess I’m just making the point all nonterninating are hard to codify in non mathematical fonts formatting etc. For instance using that 0.88888 example, that decimal very much does not precisely equal 8/9. you’d either have to keep writing 8s into infinity or hope everybody who copies/Padres your writing has a way to preserve the indicator of repeating digits.
> I'm confident he's said that the kernel needs to be buildable without Rust if need be.

FWIW that's not the same thing? That's simply CONFIG_RUST=n, not "You have to write this driver twice in two different languages".
>A closer parallel would be the industrialisation of painting duplication

But they directly reproduce the source material.

AI art they clearly does not.

The luddites seem a better parallel when it comes to scale. Where a machine comes along capable of producing in much higher quantities and in much greater efficiencies.

Or perhaps photography? Also a fear of scale. For a long time photographers were not considered artists. And there were calls to tamp down on this innovation for the harm it would cause.

I don't suppose anyone back then could imagine now how photography is used. Perhaps they would feel it much better that a tiny artist quickly sketch out the thing my phone was looking at.
I don’t believe stack overflow is in the same grey area, they have a pretty clear TOS and license for the code snippets. I’m pretty sure it’s CC-BY-SA.
I do pretty much the same thing but with Google notes or an SMS instead of Craft.

Obsidian is freakin sick!
I bet a big chunk of them have contracts that prevent them from contributing to open source. Atleast without going through a painful vetting process that drains all the enjoyment from it.
This is a load of unadulterated bullshit. Kids cry all the time. It doesn't psychologically scar them for life. Take a chill pill!

It's actual insanity how people have come up think that every. little. thing. they do as a parent has these life long ripple effects. I'm sorry to tell you: these little details of parenting just aren't important either way. What matters is food and shelter and a loving home. Focus on those things for your own family and stop driving yourself crazy with these details, and especially stop getting so riled up by what other parents are doing, it's none of your business!
One difference is that this doesn't appear to be the common example of an AI trained using biased data producing biased results. Rather this appears to be an AI with specific restrictions purposefully put in place.
How so? To me, operator overloading seems like a non feature, that at best create more ambiguity.
Stop hijacking the back button.
Saying true things with intent to mislead is lying, yes. Not just "now" - it always has been.
Well, that was more like a rhetorical hypothesis. But I won't try to be a communist either.
This literally not true. The tradwife thing is not a reaction to progressives, it is safely within conservative christian "male head of the house with authority over partner" tradition.

It predates progressive politics you complain about. Progressive politics is response to that.
Are you sure you can do that? Because it is trivial to paraphrase code and text.
> Please be careful about expressing strong opinions about things you apparently know little about.

Yeah looks like you know next to nothing about what you speak.

> Pele may have been injured early, but his performance in their first games are still important. If they lost those games, they would have been kicked out of the tournament early.

Right. You are a joke. The one game he played was what won Brazil the WC that year. In 62 it was Garrincha who took Brazil to the promised land. Benezema has a winners medal too btw.

Yeah I stand by the shit league comment. They didn't even have proper record keeping so the 1200+ goals is a bad claim. He was surrounded by great players at the WC Jairzinho, Gérson, Tostão, Rivelino in 1970.

You are comparing that to Burucchaga and Voldano. Lol. I sincerely hope you bring more rigor to your day job.

> His more than 1000 goals are all attested to by FIFA.

Lol. Pelé included goals scored in friendlies or matches against semi-professional or even amateur teams. These facts are not even in dispute

Christ, you are not even wrong.
Security Code Reviewing with CodeQL
> But there’s nothing stopping you from re-coding existing implementations of GPL’ed code.

There is if you've read the code. You can still violate copyright if you're hand-copying an implementation of a feature.

Lawyers recommend "clean room" re-implementations when reproducing copyrighted functionality (when folks bother to ask) precisely to avoid the risk of code being copied verbatim.

Functionality can be copied. Code can not.
Near part of the west coast, there are fairly large effects due to plate tectonics (centimeters per year). I would think western California must have a measurement system whose position relative to points on the east coast gets adjusted periodically, with various deeds recording positions relative to ‘fixed’ points near the west coast.
Classic K&R C? Where you declared the function arguments Pascal style out of line and had to rely on separate “lint” programs to check for typesafety in function calls?

Surely you mean C89, where functions have some type safety but C’s variable declaration syntax remains a horrible inelegant kludge?

Have you written much code in Swift?
That's like 15 minutes of work tho
We've repeated ourselves a bunch of times but it irks me to let one of these nonsense comments go unresponded, so again: two year olds and one year olds are not infants and are not helpless. They can fall asleep independently perfectly well.
Why have so many of these AI models been trained on GPL licensed code? Almost half the controversy could have avoided by ignoring GPL code.

I know that even non-copyleft licenses like the Apache and MIT licenses are copyrighted and require attribution however it would have caused far less controversy than training on GPL licensed code.
I’ve been paying for Kagi since September (which is when they started charging for their service), and I’m really happy with it so far.

The search results are noticeably not worse than googles, even for things that depend heavily on location.
I really didn’t feel the need to fall back to Google more than once or twice in total.
I also feel like their ranking is slightly better in that the first or second result is usually what I’m looking for, not half a page down.

10$ a month is the upper limit of what I am comfortable paying for it, I’d feel much better if it were 5$. But I really, really want Kagi to succeed. They have a great product, if they can’t make paid search work then I fear it’s not going to happen at all.
So I pay 10 bucks a month for a great search engine with a great interface where I can be sure that my data isn’t sold of.

Sidenote: I can also highly recommend their Orion browser for Mac. It’s based on safari (so it’s light on resources and very battery friendly), but supports chrome extensions + it has first class support for tree style tabs.
Probably why, like the article says, they're planning to add that

> In an attempt to address the issues with open-source licensing, GitHub plans to introduce a new Copilot feature that will “provide a reference for suggestions that resemble public code on GitHub so that you can make a more informed decision about whether and how to use that code,” including “providing attribution where appropriate.” GitHub also has a configurable filter to block suggestions matching public code.
Except that it seems a lot more people are pushing the "girlboss" lifestyle compared to the "tradwife" one. Of course, ideally, everyone would simply have the freedom to do what's best for themselves. It's not very responsive to call "girlboss" a product of modern capitalism as the Mashable article does, since one could say the exact same thing about modern stay-at-home lifestyles.
Why is it fair use if you train a model on copyrighted material and use its transformative output, despite going against the will of the author?

Can we all legally pirate educational books since it's for self training and producing transformative outputs? Can I consume all media (books, movies, music) the same way, and call it fair use? Also for software?
My point is one shouldn't bring up Apache in the first place when talking about a project like Log4j. It's similarly irrelevant as "hosted on GitHub".
People have a strange tendency to enjoy being rewarded for work they've done.

I suspect that the folks who invest hundreds of millions of dollars into production costs for a movie, rather enjoy the ability to recoup those costs by restricting access to only those who are willing to pay for the privilege.
There's nothing inherently wrong or problematic with a stay-at-home lifestyle if that's what you prefer and you can afford it.

This is quite literally the viewpoint of all progressive politics, ever.
In essence a signature is all about intent. An X can be your signature or any type of mark. What matters is that you are marking your intention to enter an agreement.

You can ask your friend to sign your name for you. That is 100% your legally binding signature even though they drew it because of your intent.

Obama signed bills into law remotely using an auto pen while he was in Europe. That is 100% his signature because of intent. The DOJ wrote a compressive piece on this that goes into signatures in general much deeper: https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/whether-president-may-si...
The real issue I find with stuff of this nature is one of aesthetic distance.
It's similar to BDSM in a way: certain people fantasies about being a 'slave' but to actually enact the thing beyond the bounds of fantasy, to go from aesthetic to actuality, requires the relinquishment of the thing that allows the engagement in the fantasy in the first place -- consent.

There is an interview series on youtube, can't remember where, of people who grew up in the 50s.
It sounds like a miserable place.
There is a reason that housewives were prescribed quaaludes in record numbers and consumed so much alcohol.
In most places, women wouldn't be allowed to open bank accounts or get a credit card alone for another two to three decades.

If people want to live one place or another, wear this or that clothing, engage in various aesthetic enactments, etc, that is one thing, but when we whitewash the underlying conditions that were the milieu in which the adopted proto-aesthetic formed, we have to be careful that this does no rehabilitate those underlying conditions.

BDSM is at little risk of this due to the nature of consent that is welded into the community, the attempt to maintain a firm division between fantasy and reality.
Palingenetic fantasies of bygone eras, however, seem to have much less of a check in place against their actualization; in fact, their actualization, I would say, is exactly the goal of a certain minority who holds such views.
It is the difference between a safe practitioner of BDSM and someone who uses BDSM language as a cover for abuse.
Does anyone feel like this model is stretched really thin? Like, tech has a problem of easily identifying who's competent or not and has to do tech interviews to (try to) establish that.

I feel like establishing if someone is an expert or represents one of these shapes is going to be even harder.
Seems cleaner and possibly faster to turn the checks inside out?

if (input.size() == 5) {
return memcmp(input.data(), "https", 5) == 0;
}
if (input.size() == 4) {
return memcmp(input.data(), "http", 4) == 0 || memcmp(input.data(), "file", 4) == 0;
}

etc

Edit: Nvm I see the issue with this, if you have a set like
abcd1, abcd2, abcd3 then it has to try abcd first and then 1 and then abcd and then 2 and then abcd and then 3.

You could do sort of manual trie of full 8 byte chunks followed by a 4 byte step followed by a 2 byte step followed by a 1 byte step. But yeah suddenly it's not so clean anymore.

The example set doesn't have this issue though.
> What the hell is "log4jshell" that is a completely stupid name. It confers some meaning that isn't there.

It's a pun on Log4J and describes the vulnerability: all you need to get reverse shell is for the application to log input.

What meaning do you feel it confers that isn't there?

(The trend of subsequent vulnerabilities being dubbed "...4Shell" is infuriating, though.)
Micron, Samsung and SK Hynix are doing volume production of 1xnm QLC devices with further complexity like CuA.
Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin is a competitor in theory but in reality as far as I know they have not won a single contract from SpaceX. Not sure if they're even in the ring.
No plugin necessary, it does that natively.

Go to Settings, select Editor, and enable All pages public when publishing.

You must then define which pages to publish using the Make it public for publishing.

Finally, go again to Settings, select Export Graph, and choose Export public pages.
I think harder, as it is spammed around in all directions. It's easier to attribute a unique piece of code that appears in a single repo.

But boilerplate functions don't deserve copyright protection as they are not creative. Can I copyright print('hello world!') if I post it in my repo? Do I deserve a citation from now on?
Same here. I got it after writing some macros to automate parts of my first job after college. The rest is history!
I refuted what he said by pointing out that 1E9 x 1E6 = 1E15. A billion row table denormalised with a million row table = 1000 trillion row table. How big's your disk array? How are you going to ensure correctness on update?

His was stupid advice and had it should not have been given.

> You continue to just say it depends without giving any actual scenarios

it depends. Use your common sense and then use a stopwatch, is a good start. There are entire shelves of books on this, I won't repeat them.

> You make it sound like magic, but it’s not:

absolutely true!

> “under x and y, do z except when u” is better than

it's a multidimensional problems inc. memory size, disk size, the optimiser, sizes of particular tables joined, where the hotspot is, cost of updates of non-normalised tables, etc. I can't give general advice from here.

> Also, your main points are against denormalization and avoiding large table joins which are 100% rational arguments under certain workloads.

I said "Denormalising is a useful tool that IME rarely gains you more than it loses you,"

I don't accept your criticism.
Show HN: I built a possible alternative to social media RSS
Hi there, I built a chrome extension to grab new posts from social media.

Instagram, twitter, Pinterest, etc don't really allow for RSS so I worked on this alternative to get new posts. Hope this might be useful for some of you.
> Reactionary != White Nationalist

There are certainly places in the world where there are significant local reactionary ideologies that are not White Nationalist, but the US is not among them.
Tradwufe is term used literally only in right wing manosphere. It is not term used by stay at home women in general. It is not a term used by left wing people. I have seen that term used only in reactionary circles and in bdsm circles (clumsily in the latter).

And the focus was very much on male leadership and authority, male right to punish a women and expectation of submission. It was not about homemaking itself absent male dominance.
This sounds to me like your team did not think about what it means work together.

Particularly now with so much technology support from remote working you can just keep an open channel. As soon as you get stuck or want to ask something, you just share your screen and ask for some help. Not much more difficult than that.