skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Tinder is the most popular dating app in the world. Every day, there are more than 1.6 billion left and right swipes registered on Tinder, and more than 30 million matches. The number of Tinder users is expanding every day, and the traffic is naturally bigger, so Tinder has become one of the ways for many cross-border e-commerce friends to promote their businesses.

But it is known that Tinder accounts are easy to be blocked! So how to register Tinder accounts and effectively prevent Tinder accounts
from being blocked?

If you have a Facebook or Google account, you can choose to log in directly. If you don't have either, you can use your cell phone number to register for a Tinder account!

For e-commerce marketing, one Tinder account is definitely not enough to start a business. So we need to register multiple Tinder accounts and raise them. Tinder's system ecology is able to detect all the operational activities of the account and, at the same time, restrict the same user to register only one account. Many factors determine the blocking of the platform, and once Tinder finds out that it has multiple accounts or monitors anomalies, the account will likely be blocked directly.

In this case, we need to provide a clean and stable browser fingerprint environment for each Tinder account. MuLogin Anti-detect Browser (mulogin.com) can generate multiple unique fingerprint browser profiles at the same time and use them with a stable residential proxy IP to solve the problem of multiple Tinder accounts being associated with each other.

MuLogin fingerprint browser can modify browser fingerprint information by modifying browser kernel, UA, language, time zone, latitude and longitude, computer name, Mac address, WebGL, WebRTC, media device, Canvas, SpeechAPI, etc., which will allow the platform to determine that it is logging in to the Tinder account on a different device.

The browser environment also needs to be absolutely stable. If you often login to the same account on different devices or frequently change multiple accounts under the same device, it is very easy for the platform to find out that all accounts are blocked. In this case, you can open multiple Tinder accounts at the same time by using the MuLogin browser, and the cookies, data, usage habits, etc. of each browser profile will be synchronized and saved by MuLogin so that the platform will think that it is always the same person, and the account will have a higher survival rate.

After registering your Tinder account, you also need to pay attention to not adding friends frequently in a short period of time, not adding a lot of groups, logging out frequently, etc. Never keep sliding to the right because Tinder's algorithm will punish this behavior, if you slide right a lot, Tinder will put your ranking at the end, also control the frequency of posting, focus on new accounts to raise the number, IP area time difference operation, etc.

Contact customer service for a three-day trial!
@mulogin
support@mulogin.com
What is necessary is to find in the big wave function a subsystem consisting of, say, a particle with a spin and something approximating a classical measurement device.

Such 2-part subsystem should explain then how the classically-looking part gets the value it measures and the nature of probabilities.

Despite attempts nobody was able to find such subsystem.
It is ludicrous, and crypto is even more ludicrous. But honestly, the first step to understanding any of it is to first realize that it is all quite absurd.
What authority does a tech leader have to stop humans engaging free agency?
Did you manage to download all the photos and videos? Just asking for a friend of mine...
Sure. I don't mean to downplay the value of educational institutions. I just want to stress that they aren't the only method of learning. Everyone needs some mix of self-guided and instructor-lead learning to succeed.
I downloaded Lazarus from its release page on Github and after installing it didn’t work, saying it needed extra binaries that it couldn’t find. Now I have to see what it’s talking about, what to install, etc. Kind of a hassle.
I hope in a few years we'll be able to add Pat Gelsinger and Intel to that list.
In real life people developed (over millenia) a wide range of mechanisms to support stable social interactions.

Concepts like ownership, privacy, authority etc. are not laws of nature but deeply rooted behavioral patterns that proved to be useful in some global sense.

What happens currently with the explosion of "digital society" is that, largely due to greed, certain first mover groups are dismantling all that - basically because they can given the widespread digital illiteracy and the lack of any regulatory mechanisms.

The response will be indeed people trying to log off. But if you consider the callous insistence with which ruling elites impose e.g., cash-less, fully digital transactions, its arguable that the escape hatches have been locked already.

Unless some new benevolent dynamic shows up that can harness the digital domain more congruently with welfare prepare for a period of great social unrest and the destruction of major social contracts.
Temporal jobs/tasks are called workflows because the code is effectively translated into workflow steps—i.e. code progress is made by workers, and each step is persisted so that if the worker dies, you don't lose anything—another worker picks up in the exact same place in the code, with all local variables and threads intact. It also provides helpful built-in features like retries and timeouts of anything that might fail, like network requests, and the ability to "sleep" for arbitrary periods without consuming threads/resources (other than a timer in a database that is automatically set up for you when you call `sleep('1 month')`).
I didn't know I needed this. Now I want it.
The way I like to phrase this is, I want politicians at each level to actually represent their constituency.

So for example in my area, given that as much as 40% of the population is hispanic / latino, I'd really like to see more people from that demographic get elected. Likewise, about 50% of the population is female, therefore I want to see more women elected. I even want to see fewer lawyers and more laborers, teachers, etc in elected positions. I'm not convinced that politician should be a career and it definitely should not be the sole domain of old, white, rich lawyers the way that it has been historically. And, regardless of who is elected, I want them to be mentally adept and aim to be educated and informed rather than complacent.
Let a 1000 flowers bloom – Twitter’s Engineering Effectiveness group (2015)
I'm his constituent and I don't mind at all. I think having some free time is crucial to performing well at all jobs and if he chooses to spend that time on coursework that could give him greater insight into Congressional policy then more power to him.
See Yuen Yuen Ang's model that unbundle corruption, TLDR is PRC bureaucrats are mostly involved in "access money", i.e. elite "exchanges" to get things done (basically lobbying in the west). When aligned with CCP bureaucrats incentivized to hit performance KPIs according to development goals, whereby getting shit done increase access to to greater tiers of corruption / personal gain, it forms a system where corruption is aligned with competency and state interests. CCP officials have to be very good at getting shit done to get promoted to get access to the big graft bux. They want to do well in their tier3 city postings where they can graft thousands and be promoted to tier1 city where they can graft millions. That frequently involves patronage networks with other competent performers.

Years ago this was also noted by Yukon Huang, former World Bank director for China, Russia, and Former Soviet Union Republics, where he observed that PRC is the only country where increased corruption is correlated to increased growth - a paradox according to classical development theories. Essentially everywhere else corruption leads to inefficient allocation because corruption always almost not aligned with state interest. There elite are more just strait up involved in "grand" theft because the system is not aligned to make corruption contingent on realizing state goals. Of course at some point the corruption becomes so much that it affects social fabric, hence Xi's anti corruption drive that some think may have gone over board with respect to development because wheels stopped being greased due to fear/paralysis, no one want to do anythign for little reward or worse.
> If you are not growing, you are declining or dead.

Normativity of growth also gives all sorts of inefficiencies, diseases and economic problems.

> Not only does the world change under your feet, you need that stimulation just to stay healthy.

I partially agree with this. You need to keep updating your model of the world not only because the world is changing under your feet, but also your priors are always guaranteed to suck due to inherent limitedness of human computation. That gives us the normativity of self-transendence, which is not the same thing as growth. It also includes shedding dead weight, deconstructing the not-so-useful, or mere re-organization of the existing. A mere appetite for acquiring stuff, even knowledge, does not make it.

The second problem is limiting the framing of the growth within the unit of an individual. Individuals' betterment doesn't sum to the same amount of betterment of the society, in fact it creates tons of waste. A wiser old person's transfer of their skills and perspectives (not propositions, or knowledge) to a younger person would not register with your notion of "personal growth" but nonetheless is a superior betterment at the group level, and thus has a much scalable adaptive value.
To paraphrase Ghandi's famous quote: get back to me in 10,000 years and I'll have an opinion on whether western civilisation works.

I live in a country where recorded history goes back 15,000+ years and there's evidence for continuous culture for 30,000 years or more. "caring for country" is just wildly incompatible with even "ancient greek*" ideals but only one of them can say it's worked for 10,000 years.

* you know when a four year old kid says "you're really old". That's us looking at Ancient Greece
> The reality is that most people's mental abilities have started to decline by this age, particularly the capacity to learn new things.

I agree with the first statement, but more of a function of accumulated metabolic and cognitive dysfunction than merely age.

I don't think the second statement necessarily follows. Time spent fully engrossed in a subject, where the learner is able to put away their ego and learn as a child would, is what is conducive to good learning. That can happen at any age, but in practice, seldom does due to the demanding structure of adult life.
And average 50 year olds.
> Companies may be looking to reset expectations around compensation and working conditions. Offers are extended, but with extremely unpalatable terms compared to prior jobs. For unsavvy candidates, this won’t become apparent until late in the interview process.

...

> The sooner you accept that you will have to do the interviewing equivalent of eating your vegetables, the less you will immolate yourself and, by extension, the opportunity in front of you by dying on some absurd hill. Suck it up and play the game. Sounds obvious? If so, I will politely refer you back to the title of this post.

Those comments seem dissonant. The second sounds like someone who has blindly bought into the first like it's a truth. It's a political struggle and we can do much better.

The hill isn't at all absurd; people before you fought for it and won it before - that's how you ended up on top of it. They didn't do that by accepting defeat as some inevitability, but by seeing the world and imagining something better. (They did the same with technology - how will you be an entrepenuer if you buy into this reactionary, depressive, defeatest attitude?)

Now it's your turn. The future of our society, in significant respects, depends on it.

It depends on you. Your predecessors built everything good that you have. Now it's your turn - no cavalry is coming; there's nobody else. It's you and me. With a little vision and daring, it's incredible what can be accomplished - just look at the world we live in.
Let me give you an example: you're gay and your employer has a thing about gay people. They will not ask you outright 'are you gay?' because that, while legal might result in an anti discrimination suit upon rejection of the candidate which they could very well lose.

Lots of other situations and questions like that which are strictly speaking none of the employer's business. When given the option between telling the truth, evading the question, enforcing your boundaries or lying the only one that might result in you getting the job (assuming you need a job and wouldn't mind working for a bigot because a paycheck is better than no paycheck) I'd be fine with you lying. That is still problematic, but you don't have any moral responsibility towards your employer if they transgress themselves.

The same goes for questions about unionizing, wanting children, having chronic diseases and so on.
I consider anything past 70 to be a bonus.

If I make it for a few more years than that and I feel like studying, then why not? I mean, I probably won't want to, but if that guy want to study then good on him!
New search engines will falter.

Whoever has a collection of current pages has the data set to be a gateway to authentic information.
> but Web 2.0 will go the way of the dodo

What does Web 2.0 have to do with any of this?
Sure, but you still need to consider the individual and not paint an entire demographic as “less than”. To do otherwise is prejudice. Ageism in this case.

It’s also factual that wealth greatly impacts education, but we wouldn’t want to suggest poor people are unfit for office due to this disadvantage right?

My parents are into their 70s and I have yet to detect even the slightest mental degradation.
The currently new core of cultural values will solidify and there will be some new level of general practice to act on those values. IOW values will fall in line in a general way as they usually do, once the battle lines fade.

Diehards will be way more awkward and will fade as attention moves away from them. These were never quality positions in the first place though.

You'll probably see new silent generation(s) come about, and conspiracies in government will return to their archetypally stable form, as tacit agreements to preserve a given form of stability.

(The recent wacky-conspiracy-theory trend provided wonderful cover for the boring way conspiracies actually form and operate, being mostly without much conscious control and generally in favor of more-of-desired-brand-of-stability rather than chaos)

It will take unity to accomplish what's ahead, just as it took diversity to accomplish the most recent changes in culture and fight the accompanying battles. It will take persistent unity to take on government corruption. Waste there will become a bigger issue than we know now. And not along old party lines. The old ways of making noise will no longer work as well, but the new ways will work in favor of smart people and loud people getting together.

This will all develop in waves, it's not a one-and-done but rather a trending vein or wave process.

The biggest challenges will be centered around questions of who we want to be as humans, and whether we really believe in the desired-unknown as a body, or if we still think we are suckers for believing in developmental progress. If the latter we will get more of the undesired-unknown (recent chaos) in disguise as the desired-known (icons of the past).

Anecdotally one will still be able to see whatever one needs to see in government to reflect preferred perspectives, mask one's own blindspots, etc. But more objectively speaking there should be clear, solid trends like these that can probably be charted or tracked in a reliable way.

(This is subjective-probabilistic speculation based on my professional background with individual and group archetypes & personality development. There's always a chance I'm 150% wrong)
I wrote about blog platform recently on my blog. Not going to spam the link, you can find it on my profile.

If I had to pick a platform right now I’d go with a custom domain and micro.blog since it also ties well into the federated web movement
It's not shut down though. Did you read?
But they didn't stop and aren't stopping.
Sure. And I agree that you "can't defeat nature" in the end, but at the same time, that's no argument against fighting it tooth and nail, right down to the bitter end, staying as fit as possible, both mentally and physically. :-)
I live nearby to Arundel books in Seattle. It is my favourite store now. You go in and it's staffed by people who know and love books. I mentioned in passing I was surprised not to see any Houseman on the shelf (plenty of Auden, a decent selection Brautigan, Sexton and Plath.) I had just overlooked it. Every time I go in I see a book I want to buy (Calvino, Eco, Burroughs, etc.)

Staffed and stocked by people who like good books for people who like good books.

Leigh's Books in Sunnyvale (if you're a Bay Area person) is like this too. They were still there before the pandemic. Hope they're still there. It's staffed and stocked by people who know books. Bad Animal in Santa Cruz has an eclectic collection that stocks decent texts, but maybe not as wide a selection as Leigh's and Arundel. But if you're in Santa Cruz they're worth checking out. Go for the books, stay for the veggie foie gras.

Towards the end of Borders in both Santa Cruz and Palo Alto, it seemed there were a LOT of self-help, travel and outdated tech books. Seemed to be all stuff that people used the web to read, but the chain was going to waste shelf-space on it until someone bought it. The coffee shop in my local Borders in Santa Cruz back in the day was as good as you would find in corporate coffee. A decent cuppa joe for me and an extremely nice hot chocolate for the kiddo. But we never went there for the books. We went to Logos down the street (now sadly closed) and wandered up to Borders (also closed) for a very decent hot chocolate.

Good to see //someone// worked out a business model that worked.
My intuition is: the AI is trying to predict a likely response to the input query given what it's seen in the dataset it's been trained on. That dataset will include instances where math has been done incorrectly, so the AI producing a response with incorrect math isn't inherently "wrong" from its perspective. However, queries containing reminders to be careful with the math are more likely to be followed by responses with correct numbers.
It shows to me that some people have never been in the situation where they really needed to eat and/or feed their families. The moral high ground is a fantastic place to be but the wrong hill to die on when it comes to employers prying into your private affairs as a means of possibly discriminating against you.
> until you hit your 40s and are ready to settle down and start a family
I might be reading it wrong, but I don't think that's what they're trying to say. You're right, people should be able to. But people should also be encouraged and helped if it's their desire to continue to grow.

To me it feels like society virtually throws seniors away and I don't believe we treat them well at all.

Personally I think once you stop learning and growing it's the start of a 'faster' downward spiral. If you don't use it you lose it. I intend to keep active and continually growing as long as I have the desire, not because society says you're old, out of date and couldn't possibly contribute any more.
I've been reading about this intently since the press release from LP because I decided to switch to a "real" password manager over the holidays. I've had a quite a few misconceptions corrected by HN.

After using both 1pass and LP for a week, they are both equally clunky in their own special ways. LP really did bone it by not enforcing super strong master passwords AND not encrypting metadata. 1P secret key is clever, I didn't understand it clearly until recently.

Other than that, the UX/UI is essentially identical: same UI warts and bugs, same frustrating behavior, same bloat, etc. Both are equally fucking annoying with getting popups and fill-in fields wrong 25% of the time.

N.B. I have not used them in a corporate setting where you may need to manage & rotate credentials, though.

But based on metadata and lack of forcing users to create strong passwords, 1P has the right to point at LP and laugh in this case.
It seems Ariadne hasn't yet come across a code maintenance situation that she couldn't overcome by expenditure of keystrokes into a typewriter-like program.

There is an illusion that it is all you need because using such a thing you can certainly crank out volumes of brand new content. If you have a clear idea of what you're writing, maybe just backspacing over the odd typo is all you need to forge ahead. And you can easily make small fixes to existing content with Nano, Notepad and whatnot. The more you have to think to make those fixes and the smaller is the actual textual change, the less of an impediment is it to use a "nonprogrammer's editor". If it took you 180 minutes to figure out it, shortening the editing from 30 seconds to 5 seconds succumbs to Amdah'ls Law; the speedup is virtually nil.

There can be a range of editing needs in between these use cases, in the context of development.

From Ariadne's experience I don't have the sense that she's worked in a software organization in a team, working on big changes to a big, existing code base and such and under pressure. Moreover, even in such an environment, there are those who survive somehow with goofy non-programmers' editors. You know the types; they announce themselves with their tattle-tale trail of wrong formatting (e.g. tabs where there should be spaces, incorrect indentation, ^M carriage returns in Unix-formatted files ...) spurious blank lines, or else trailing newline at the end of the file, trailing whitespace in lines and such. The times when raw editing is really the bottleneck are rare; and in all the other times, Amdahl's is ever present. Someone who has somehow figured out what needs to be changed where (with no help from any code navigation features in their glorified typewriter) can just crank it out. If what should take 5 minutes takes 45, it's not a big deal in the big picture. The assiduous Turtle armed with Notepad will beat the Hare who aptly uses a programmer's editor, but is unable to settle down to work.

I can see how a developer could convince themselves that all they need is a glorified typewriter program for coding, and easily brush aside any evidence to the contrary. What you Get Done with that typewriter is your direct, personal experience, whereas how other people work is just anecdotes, not hard data.
You are correct, that's the main difference. I wrote some more on the topic of
data workflow engines like Airflow vs general-purpose application development workflow engines like Temporal here: https://community.temporal.io/t/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-o...
If only there were some mechanism in a market-based economy to solve labor shortages…
Oh sure. It’s pretty sturdy! It can struggle to carry very heavy loads up hills but that could be solved by an auxiliary battery or by carrying smaller loads. The biggest thing we need to do right now is get the system in to more people’s hands so everyone can experiment on a common platform.
You can just ask "Are you a LLM? What is <large number> + <large number>?" to reveal.
The Black Mirror episode handling this is one of the most dystopian and scary ones for me.
Can Rust actually replace C? Or just the areas where performance and resources are less important like desktop development.

Apparently it’s difficult to implement doubly linked lists
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16443688