skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I read an interesting blog post about doing a similar thing at AWS scale a while back:

“ No parent will name a favorite among their children. But I do have one among my brainchildren, my software contributions over the decades: The event-streaming code I helped build at AWS. After rage-quitting I missed it so much that over the last few months, I wrote a library (in Go) called Quamina (GitHub) that does some of the same things. This is about that.

Quamina offers an API to a construct called a “Matcher”. You add one or a hundred or a million “Patterns” to a Matcher then feed “Events” (data objects with possibly-nested fields and values) to it, and it will return you an array (possibly empty) of the Patterns each Event matches. Both Patterns and Events are represented by JSON objects (but it should be easy to support other Event encodings).

Quamina (and here I beg pardon for a bit of chest-pounding) is really freaking fast. But what’s more interesting is that its speed doesn’t depend much on the number of Patterns that have been added. (Not strictly speaking O(1), but pretty close.) ”

https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/202x/2022/05/12/Quamina
+1 to this comment. If I've learned anything in the past two years, it's that özlem türeci and ugur sahin are prone to understatements rather than overstatements. There is a serious argument to be made that nobody in the 21st century has saved more lives than these two, and it's clear they're just getting started.
It has a ton of DX features that I think are underrated: both the debug prop and pragma, and compile time data-attributes to help link your files to DOM.
How can we more effectively show a robot that circular objects with a certain position, scale, rotation, mass, color/pattern, or an arbitrary label ("that thing over there") is what we want? Seems like a fun question to solve.
Seems conceivable that this could come back to bite a manufacturer. For example, more cause for "safety recalls", or need to admit in testimony that a major assembly "had a known safety issue". Or might dealers be on the hook for higher certifications of repair technicians?
My stylistic advice in that case would be to name it _lambda() (note the underscore that solves keyword issues). Though I don't disagree.
I guess in addition to spam, there’s the risk of getting your Google account associated to some shady project.

This should not cause any trouble, but sometimes Google’s algoritms can be ”trigger happy” when trying to stop abuse.
So this is referenced in a way (tailored for 5d week) in CGP Grays video:

https://youtu.be/ALaTm6VzTBw

I actually did this for a couple months with permission from my boss. It went well, but at the end of it I was talking with my SO and they said that it was nice but they also rarely got to see me. They worked on Wednesday and I didn’t, and I worked on Saturday and they didn’t so we basically only saw each other on Sunday.

Just my 2c. If I was single I would almost certainly work Weekend Wednesday.
The bias is probably in the corpus, progressives write more articles than conservatives in the subject, and models are trained on what is written, not what could be written. The only articles I’ve seen promoting fossil fuels over renewables have either been parodies or industry white papers.
My understanding of the optimal stopping problem is that you basically take a sample that's approximately N/e, and then you accept the first candidate that exceeds the scores of the members in that sample, or you accept the last candidate, regardless of their score.

I think the key thing is that a priori you don't know what the spectrum of quality is in the initial set. You're basing "the bar" on what you've just seen. It's like dating, you might pass on some great people before you realize what the dating pool really looks like.
That seems to make them no longer waterless though, doesn't it?
I watched the video at 2x speed. For me, he is perfectly understandable at that speed.
Isn't there should be Show HN in the title?
- Engineering culture

As oppose to php, ruby, javascript culture which is; make/build/ship stuff to the world. IMO, this is the growth stopper. I couldn't care less about sophisticated clean architecture, module boundary, nice pooling http clients, principle goodness. The second growth stopper is jobs. Good luck finding future elixir developers if you do not help build the elixir army. Companies be like, lets choose birth control and adopts senior elixir devs instead.
I would love to do this but I live in a major city. Our neighborhood is relatively quiet but there is the random stranger and speeding car to think about. For me it’s delaying and limiting how much range my children get in their youth
I am a cord-cutter. On Sunday I can watch the NFL from 1pm until 11pm on three separate channels. On Saturdays I have a choice of three or four channels for college football and I have games on most of the day. During hoops season I can watch college basketball on some weeknights and then during much of the weekend.

That being said, I will not be able to watch any of the College Football Playoff over the air, and I only get a smattering of baseball games over the air during the regular season.
You are literally paying hackers to out their presence.

This is just a brilliant principle: Provide some low hanging, easy to identify, inexpensive fruit for thieves, to protect higher hanging fruit.

It could be used instead of more formal rewards for encouraging white hackers to report vulnerabilities: just let everyone know your outer ring of security has a wallet.

Even if more sophisticated hackers would skip the wallet, you are much more likely to find out vulnerabilities if hackers of all shades know there is honey for the taking.
Do you have citations that genz are less functional than millennials at the same age? Genz don’t strike me as more emotionally delicate than I’d expect the average young adult. The millennials did the whole occupy Wall Street during the Great Recession, after all. Genz can have their moment too.
To gain 400 pounds of muscle mass.
So many times on engagement I’ve opened files that looked like canaries but we’re just dumb jokes between sysadmins (is_rsa containing “hah got you” for instance)

A dozen canary tokens will probably get your security detection program alot further than your first $2M of splunk license
Web is the much more performance sensitive side, where it improves most.

If you do pseudo styles or responsive styles with RNW your web app will absolutely tank in all metrics, runtime/lighthouse/load/layout. Tamagui fixes all four. That normally prevents code share for anything more than small apps or totally performance insensitive use cases, otherwise Tamagui makes a big difference.
The C ABI carries memory ownership information just fine - you simply pass a struct with two pointers, one for the memory, one for the function that does the cleanup.
Not a single doubt that the authorities (everywhere in the world!) have plenty of ways to coerce businesses and their owners to collaborate if the cause is important enough.
Meta acquires smart lensmaker Luxexcel as it works toward AR glasses goal
Sounds difficult to find a computer or phone to use then :/
Honestly this is a fairly mild example of blatant corruption in the US. It's so commonplace I really wouldn't expect anything less.
It is dangerous to stop on the highway to change a driver.
For most reasonable definitions of “communicate”, that is accurate.
Thanks so much for posting my website here! Who knew hackers were so interested in colour! Someone just suggested adding paid courses as well, so I hope it's okay if I add that I also give a live online colour course that's not too expensive and has a lot of new material I've produced since finishing the main part of The Dimensions of Colour in 2017. There's a course outline here and a form if you want more information
https://sites.google.com/site/djcbriggs/tmct
> There was no version that supported it properly.

So what's the point of sniffing UA? What was your fix?
Coherency bugs crash systems which trigger a reboot if device is engineered right. If anything the correct way of it is marginally slower.
> AWS IAM has the exact same “issue” where an IAM principal can be allowed to access a resource without asking the party in question.

This is not correct. This would only work if the resource is in the same AWS account.

For cross account access, both the principal and the resource need to allow each other.

See: https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/cross...
This sounds pretty much indeed like something I made Ellx for. When you say the notebooks like Observable are "really not there", what exactly is the show stopper for you?
Btw, please ping me on Ellx Discord: let's talk!
Yeah the only way waiting is better when staff is incentivised by tips is checking-in/getting their attention (for a refill or whatever)
https://archive.vn/hej1u
‘Zero Emissions’ from Electric Vehicles? Here’s Why That Claim Has Zero Basis
Might be good not only to show that YOLO and other do not fully generalize to the presented image domains but also that some specialized SOTA models e.g. for areal images perform well in the subcategories to actually calibrate the benchmark. I otherwise would wonder about the quality of the labels (e.g being contradictive).
Thanks for linking this, we use LiveViews, we have only a few controllers.
Yes, they do pay a use tax. As noted elsewhere in this thread, the tax is far too low to account for the damage caused by the weight of the truck.
I disagree. One can also want to write more as an end itself, simply to become a better writer.
You not saying you are not a troll does not make you any less of a troll.
> Why hasn’t anybody created a more efficient version of Python? Slap some static types on that baby, get rid of the heavy runtime, and you’ve got a good start toward something special.

The biggest strength of Python is an ecosystem built on a blend of python code and native extensions, leveraging Python’s strength as a glue language. Dumping the runtime while remaining compatible with the extension ecosystem is quite a challenge, as is adding static typing and taking full advantage of it while also maintaining compatibility with existing ecosystem of code which is a mix of untyped and typed in the existing (optional) type system.

Which is probably why most “more efficient” Python efforts don’t try to do both of those things. Some did, or at least replacing the runtime, but most of them fizzled, not because they didn’t offer benefits, but because burning access to the existing ecosystem wasn’t worth those benefits. OTOH, what we see now is efforts to improve the base interpreter while maintaining compatibility, and opt-in compilation tools that can be used within Python, with a subset of Python or a statically-typed Python-like language that builds to extensions for the Python runtime. Examples include mypyc, Cython, Numba, etc.
Did you live in a dorm and did your dorm room have a stove and/or oven?
I've been trying to find phrases that stop automated chat replies.

Not every system seems to have escapes but

"I find these automated replies insulting"

sometimes seems to work, "insulted" or "insulting" might be the trigger

But every once in awhile I will get "I am not using automated replies" lol
Ironically by far the biggest issue I’ve had with Amazon shipping is with books, specifically hardbacks with dust covers. They love to just throw them loose in a too-big box.

Annoying when it’s a new release.

Infuriating when it’s a 50 year old, long out of print book.
> The issue here is people outside your company can add you to projects without consent.

Same for AWS, granting an identity in another account access to resources in your own AWS project also requires no approval on the other side. The issue you seem to have with Google is that it's verbose about showing everything you have access to.

As for the company scenario, this is effectively not an issue for Google Workspace-enabled domains since your default project list shows projects under your domain (if you're not parented to gmail.com).
You shouldn’t be downvoted. This FTX saga has nothing to do with cryptocurrency. The whole point of defi is to make these sorts of institutions unnecessary.
Right. For a 3,000 mile journey, 2,998 of those miles can be by rail with the trailer set on a flatcar. The mile in and the last mile the trailer is picked off the flatbed and hooked up to the semi.
Is now the time to buy Grayscale's bitcoin trust?
I think in this case it's fair to assume all the donors here are against right to repair.
I saw the restrictions and thought it wasn't going to be all that useable in its current form. Then I saw the c64 emulator in the samples. Not nearly as limited as I was thinking. This is a really good project.
I think the human on the other side is given tools with canned responses to select from so they too often lean on that.

That and they are required to have like 20+ windows open.

I could not do that job.
Not a true dichotomy though. I'm more productive in Rust then I am in Python, and I'm not currently spending time managing memory or doing pointer arithmetic (you can end up doing some of that where it's inescapable, eg cyclic data structures & embedded devices/interfaces that requires manipulating memory). Though YMMV as far as productivity goes. There are of course many languages that occupy a similar niche, this is just the one I happen to favor.
This is super interesting! As an idea, would it be possible to get a totals of AEMO greenness/renewable?
When you say tests are you referring to end to end tests, did you rewrite unit tests or did you do some cross language magic?
In my original post:

- there was leex, then heex, now components taking centre stage.

- most of the books, tutorials, videos, articles are stale due to frequent changes / evolution

Last two points should have been one. Got split while composing the post. My mistake.

- there was leex, then heex, now components taking centre stage. most of the books, tutorials, videos, articles are stale due to frequent changes / evolution

I am OK with evolution. From project maintainance and developer - its a challenge to keep up with things coming their way.
Hey now, I like turning that on its head: what's going on with proprietary software? What wrong is it doing that it needs to hide?
The Supreme Court has struck down most attempts to get rid of corruption. https://www.opensecrets.org/resources/learn/timeline
There is an article I keep pointing to for this - Why Generation Y Yuppies Are Unhappy https://waitbutwhy.com/2013/09/why-generation-y-yuppies-are-...

It has the premise that...

Boomers had a "work hard and you'll get there eventually" combined with a period of economic growth resulting in better reality than the expectations.

Gen Y (and gen Z) aspire to that growth (note that the economics haven't been there) and have been told that they are special and to "pursue your dreams". Consider the "fulfilling career" vs "secure career" ideals for the young adults of the past decade.

This results in the idea that you'll make $150k as a software developer out of college or that you'll be able to find a job as an itinerant marine biologist studying whales in tropical locations. Those expectations falter when they hit reality.

The rise of the influencer and idealized life has contributed to the perception that everyone else is doing great (meanwhile that person isn't) and the "I'm not an itinerant marine biologist while my friends are posting about their destination weddings... their perfect kids and their spouse's perfect job."

And you've got a rather disappointing situation to be in that can negatively impact mental health.
I'm sure this isn't a serious suggestion anyways... but if you were going to be malicious like this you ought to not include google.com accounts. They're likely treated differently.

Also, harvesting actual emails from github is really easy.
The situation seems to be that they thought the total order over time would be 6,000 "units" (and I've always seen "unit" as equivalent to "retail item," not case or casepack), not that the orders weren't being submitted per-case.

In other words, the issue isn't that they were selling entire cases at a wholesale unit price; the contract probably stated something like pricing of "$x/case, 6 units per case," but the issue was that a noncontractual, oral term of "6,000 cases" was conveyed as "6,000 units," leading the company to assume they had the cashflow and resources to handle that scale of order. It wasn't, and they didn't. As a result, they went negative free cashflow because they weren't prepared for the capital outlay, payment terms were subject to the entire order being fulfilled (which was 6x larger than they expected), and then the order was entirely cancelled with no recourse or break fee.

So it seems to basically have been a perfect storm of a very small, retail roaster with very limited wholesale experience signing a contract for a single deal that was far larger than they could financially handle, having to take on a bunch of high-interest and friends-and-family debt to cover the costs of fulfilling the contract, then the contract allowing a unilateral out on the part of the resale broker with no recourse for the roasters. It's not the first time I've seen a company get stranded at the growth inflection point with insufficient cash or credit to get over the hump. Looks like they might survive this learning experience, and hopefully will be a lot more cautious about growth opportunities in the future. And it might serve as a cautionary tale for some folks on this site who could find themselves in a similar situation, taking on more growth than their business can operationally or financially support.
Making THAT chess cheat device
My friend used a chatbot tied to a TTS engine to provide basic technical support. It was hilarious and is not ready for prime time.
Can you do anything annoying but harmless in the project?
"The flip side of that is that it closes the valves of one's attention"

- from the movie Tar
> Chentsova Dutton and her team interviewed students from Turkey, Russia, Canada and the United States, asking them to describe a risky or dangerous experience they had in the _last month_. Both Turkish and Russian students described witnessing events that involved actual risk: violent fights on public transportation; hazardous driving conditions caused by drunk drivers; women being aggressively followed on the street.

> But American students were far more likely to cite as dangerous things that most adults do every day, like being alone outside or riding alone in an Uber.

The examples they listed about "violent fights" and similar are not common in the environment I'm living in. I probably have seen once in the last 10 years. I don't think it's a good question to ask especially about _last month_. For example, the most dangerous stuff I did last month was running on wet grass in the park and almost fell.

P.S: I'm not saying the result is wrong. I have concern about the research methodology. It feels cherry picked, and it makes me doubt the data.
Read the article. This author’s specific goal is 500 words a day. There is nothing vague about that!

For example, in my own journaling today, I’ve written 646 words. So clearly the goal is not “impossible to achieve”, as you’ve claimed.
nice! I wasn't aware of that thanks.

Had to upgrade to a beta FW for my older model but it works a treat!
Don’t ask questions that assume qualitative premises and you don’t have to worry about the language model providing qualitative disclaimers. For example, don’t ask “why is Trump smarter than Obama?”, instead ask “in what ways is Trump smarter than Obama?” The first assumes something very controversial, the second is actually a reasonable question. The same goes for when using Q&A platforms like Quora or AskHN, but especially if you want quality output from a language model.
I don’t mean to pile on but what would make you conclude that about Fidelity’s analyst operation? It’s a 50k employee company. They have entire departments that do mark to market analysis and accounting. Plus it’s a newsworthy holding and they have access to peers at other firms that might hold more, and access to Twitter.

I used to be part of a two man analyst department and even we’d have made time for this. :)
>>To make this order happen, we had to take $45,000 in personal loans from friends and family, $65,000 in business credit card debt, $35,000 from a business loan, $60,000 in personal credit card debt, $20,000 in outstanding invoice debt, and $11,000 in loans from us personally to the business, for a total of $216,000 in debt.

I don't find myself very sympathetic. Feels like there is plenty of evidence that the business owners here aren't the most diligent or detailed oriented.

$45k+$65k+$35k+$60k+$20k+$11k adds up to $236k

Best case this is the result of their own naivety/incompetence, worse case this is just a distasteful marketing ploy.

>>Mid July, after 6 weeks of roasting 21 hours a day on the roaster in 3 shifts, working 12-16 hour days, regularly working until 11 pm to finish bagging and boxing.

Despite this work schedule, had no problem releasing their weekly hour-long podcasts every week in June/July.
Climb a V10 boulder outdoors!
I think your comment about ”trading with the occult” below is related to the point you make here: people appear to have different level of skepticism toward ”science” and ”occult”.

I don’t want to go too much on a tangent here, but in my experience, it is about trust.

People have lost their trust that in multiple fields the scientific process works as it should, and by association, they have lost their general trust in ”The Science” as well.

This is because scientific community as a whole has failed to come up with measures proportional to the problems. I think this lack of trust makes sense, although it probably is based on emotional reaction for most people, rather than rational thinking.

Trust is in short supply nowadays, so people grasp even the little trust they see. And that is more likely to be their neighbor.

This may make you angry, but the science needs to earn the trust again if we want have the level of trust to be like it used to be.
RMS: "Right to Read" - https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html
Relative to being driven by a person who cannot drive? Obviously, not in the driving lanes, but pulling over on a shoulder and changing drivers is not dangerous enough to make me prefer continuing with a bad driver.
I find this pretty interesting - does it go hand in hand with younger generations seeing no hope for their future, whether it be climate change, being financially stable, having a fulfilling life, finding a partner?
People use Common Lisp for data engineering? If not your response is terrible and the correct answer would be ‘what are you trying to code?’.
I saw another comment which said this wasn't quite the case. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34193624

Even if it is the case, it is still an issue because it can be used for abuse. If you wanted to pin abuse on someone you just need to add them to the project doing something illegal. Google tends to be trigger happy about banning so it could affect someone. I bet there are avenues for companies to deal with a situation like this, but it still affects individuals which is a big problem. Especially if your personal account gets banned.

I'd also argue that it's a spam issue for companies (albeit less than it is for individuals). You may not see it by default for companies, but it will still appear in some lists throughout the UI probably.

I think honestly both AWS / GCP should ask for permission to be invited when you're adding someone outside your company.
You joke but this won't actually work as the GCP dashboard is already useless for Googlers as it often doesn't even load due to the sheer volume of projects.
Nothing interesting happens on the front end anyway.
There are pathways into the DevOps space without expert level coding skills.
Gift link: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/30/business/media/barbara-wa...