skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"Screen time" is just the term that most people use for "use of technology", in this case TV, and other computer tech (tablets, desktops, phones). What they are really talking about is the applications or "services" the kids are addicted to staring at and using by way of the screens.

> Screens are not inherently bad, or good, or anything anymore than a window is bad or good.

Once you understand it's not really the screens as such, but the things the kids are looking at by way of the screens, then the value neutral claim kind of falls apart because the things the kids are looking at by way of the screens are made to be addictive and optimized to an absurd degree for that effect of habit formation. Tech companies have been on a decades long move to remove the concept of "just a screen", an obvious example being TVs which are now all "smart". Seeing as we know that habit formation is easier to bring about in children (their habits and behaviour as children defined by their plastic nature at that age) it's within reason to be worried that an industry and parenting practice is essentially enabling intense habit formation in children for material gain.

I wouldn't let imprecise language get in the way of the main issue: is addiction to certain services and technology something we want for our children? The fact that tech execs have decided "no" seems to be ironic considering they have no problem with other children doing it.
Speaking from experience, what’s actually tricky about building your own auth isn’t the core functionality - there are lots of examples online - but rather all the things around authentication and user management that people don’t consider at first, but eventually become necessary when you go to production:

- password reset flows

- validating & cleaning inputs

- supporting multiple SSO methods for same account

- disconnecting or switching SSO methods

- handling duplicate accounts

- handling users who lose access to their login method

- email verification

- session cache validation

- detecting risky logins

- 2FA

- the list goes on…
I thought you could make this clearer and possibly faster by using a switch, but initialising the switch constants is beyond me. You need a constexpr version of memcpy, and i couldn't find one that i could use. std::copy is constexpr, but i don't think you can whip up a char* pointing to the result uint64_t in a way that's constexpr. I could write a manual loop to do the copying, but surely that wouldn't reliably be as fast as memcpy.

Anyway, this whole thing reminded me of FourCC codes, where you identify things with four-character ASCII strings, and freely reinterpret those as 32-bit integers whenever it's convenient:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FourCC
> You can achieve almost anything in life — as long as you focus on achieving one thing at a time.

Oddly I have the reverse issue.

I always focus on one thing at the time, and everything else is frozen. E.g., my full day is frozen if I have an appointment with the dentist at 2pmn. It’s a symptom of ADHD.

And I have been aiming now to force myself to do the reverse. Parallelizing tasks that can.
This attitude, like that children shouldn't sleep with parents at all costs, or should be forced to stay crying to fall asleep, is shocking to see from ex-USSR. I used to think it was our militarized culture, where parents and grand parents were obsessed with "discipline" right from birth. "Don't spoil him taking so much care", or "you'll make him a handheld child if you pick him up every time he cries" -- these are real phrases.

I thought it comes from high modernism of early XX century.

Hopping here around the comments, I see some mention that mothers start working again when the child is 3 m.o. This is very very much similar to what the USSR wanted from factory worker families -- to have the worker woman go back to the factory machine ASAP and work, work, work.

The similarity is shocking to me.
He selectively cited Roth’s academic work to make it appear as if Roth was supporting grooming and sexualization of children, despite the work doing none of that.

Roth had to flee their home due to threats to their safety.

Has Musk apologized yet?

https://gaynrd.com/if-yoel-roth-is-harmed-should-elon-musk-f...

Falsely implying other people are pedophiles or support pedophiles actions seems to be a recurring pattern in this context.
That would be interesting to hear how they come up with those maintenance schedules. Even with the uptick in flights, it doesn't seem like they'd have the dearth of reliability data to make that determination with reasonable accuracy. But maybe they have a lot of internal reliability data we're not privy to.
Pretty sure a lot of it has to do with this:

> Spiegel was born in Los Angeles, California, to lawyers John W. Spiegel and Melissa Ann Thomas. He grew up in Pacific Palisades, California, where he was raised Episcopalian. He was educated at the Crossroads School for Arts and Sciences in Santa Monica, and attended Stanford University.[1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Spiegel
I probably wouldn't take on tens of thousands of dollars of loans based on that. I guess it's presented that they took the loans out after the confusion was identified.

When I saw it yesterday they had more than 1,000 cases of the dark roast left (and none of the light or medium). So 1,000 cases in a day, a big chunk of the 34,000 bags. I wonder how long it will take them to ship, what with their not having the facilities for it.
> How can bags be mistaken for cases when negotiating a deal? The price would be different by an order of magnitude.

These kinds of confusions happen regularly, lol. Back a decade ago when I was working in pubs, colleague ordered what he thought would be one pack of paper towels - in the order form, he chose the wrong column to place the "1" in. Next day a shipping company showed up with a pallet of paper towels. Boss wasn't amused too much, but not because of the money, rather because we lacked the space to store a fucking pallet of paper towels. We ended up selling half of them to patrons at cost and managed to squeeze the rest wherever we could - I would not be surprised if someone today would still find a random roll somewhere and wonder where it came from.

In another job at a supermarket, this happened somewhat weekly. Didn't really matter unless it were really slow-moving or perishable goods, but it rarely happened in the latter case and in the former case stuff could also simply be sent back to the central warehouse.
> STM32 only recently [1] got on 90nm node!

STM32G0 is value-oriented.

The latest-and-greatest power efficiency STM32 is the STM32U5: https://www.st.com/content/ccc/resource/sales_and_marketing/...

Which seems to be 40nm.

I'm not 100% sure if the STM32U5 is the smallest node they're using. But 40nm (or better) seems like a safe bet these days.
That may be so, but the process is automated and copyright law has something to say about mechanical transformation.

As an example: if I take a piece of code you wrote and substitute all of the identifiers that does not create an original work.
What's the use case for the app? Is it to remind the user to go outside and look up to see something interesting? Or does it serve as a warning system so that one is not spooked by mysterious loud noises?
It does work, you have to add —unsupported-gpu and there’s a bunch of other tweaks to make it good. There’s a long thread on the Nvidia UNIX driver forums on how to configure it.

It is still unsupported though as wlroots only actively support open source video drivers.
React Native, so yes to all: iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, tvOS, Web etc.
https://archive.vn/2rSwV
Well if you interpret it as "do completely different jobs of different teams" of course it doesn't work.

It makes sense in single team context, say one person being very good at SQL but rest of the team having some basics will mean most of the "simple" tasks related to can be done by anyone instead of shoving everything onto expert.

Or say having just enough frontend skill that backend team can create their own internal admin panel for a service without involving frontend/UX in it and paying communication tax.
Much of what you say is true. But I came to C from Pascal. Pascal circa 1982 was unusable without all the numerous extensions each vendor tacked on. C worked out of the box. I could get things done in C without constantly fighting the Pascal and Fortran compilers of the day. This was true despite the terrible C compilers of that time.
I recently paid for Dell's next day service with a new PC purchase.
The PC arrived broken, and Dell refused to send anyone out to fix it.
Instead, I waited weeks for a replacement, feeling like a chump.

When I complained to Dell, none of their employees seemed to understand that they had failed to honor their warranty, or why I would be disappointed.

The replacement machine works fine, but Dell violated their agreement with me and so I can no longer recommend them.
This is a great topic that once matured could disrupt many other services such as AirBnb, Doordash, and even Amazon. Some level of centralization would likely be needed depending on the use case, but the goal could be to decentralize as much as feasible to distribute benefit more to nodes/providers.

In the ride share situation, the need for identification and reputation scoring is probably overrated. We flagged taxis and paid cash for a hundred years with little problems. I have hitchhiked all over the world for years and never had any real problem. Some safety mechanism should be in place for more vulnerable people. The app would know the license plate and make of car, and a button on the app clicked a few times could dispatch police using GPS. This would make it safer than walking down a street. The driver would have similar emergency button that sent all the relevant information via 911 channel.

It may not yet be time to launch this, but the existing ride share duopoly will be facing more problems ahead in financing and regulation that will eventually make this alternative very appealing.
> that happens to be programmed in Fortran.

SciPy is a highly optimized library and Fortran is faster than C for some tasks:

https://stackoverflow.com/a/146186/3383640
Having never heard of this, it just looks like a list of regex patterns. Am I missing something? There's lots of lists of patterns available [1]

If I came across this in code, I still have similar issues to regex. I have to question the source and what unit testing exists, that the tests cover the particular cases we care about, and if composed it needs tests anyway.

For context, I always split my regexs to a function and add unit tests for them, and ask the same in PRs. It is one of the easiest tests to write and most beneficial: if I don't discover a case I missed while I come up with example inputs, it protects any future modifications by future devs. It also empowers devs that don't know regexs well to be able to modify them (because they know it won't break) and to approve a PR with one.

I don't see how grok patterns avoid the need for tests (especially if composed), and if there are tests anyway, they're just a level of indirection.

In the worst case, when there's inevitably a bug (or app-specific missing situation) in one of these, it's harder to fix than just having a regex directly.

[1] https://github.com/mmkjony/awesome-regex-1 , https://regexlib.com/DisplayPatterns.aspx?cattabindex=5&cate...
And for families who can't afford $400, library cards are free.
While we're listing weird American units, don't forget the American tendency to measure any distance greater than about a mile in units of "minutes" or "hours", because of our compulsive car culture.
Noveau or Nvidia's proprietary?
How's battery life when you're not using the GPU heavily (normal desktop work)?
> Trying to use a wayland window manager outside of gnome or kde leaves you reliant on a bunch of hackish utilities (redshift, taskbar, screen recording / sharing, etc) which are available on AUR and basically no where else.

Because redshift is designed for X11. If you want redshift for Wayland then you use gammastep. Taskbar options if you don't want to use whatever is part of a common window manager would be Waybar, swaybar, and i3statusrs. Screen recording works well with OBS. All this works without relying on the AUR BTW.
Statistically speaking, I’m not sure there’s a meaningful difference between two out of three occurrences and three out of three.
maybe, but it was the coolest part to re-use. whatever inefficiencies the shuttle had that people squabble over, it was a very inspiring program. not sure how much inspiration to a small kid a SpaceX launch is, but i know exactly how much the shuttle was.
ChatGPT output is very clean and precise especially when variables provided in detail. I doubt you can trace it back if you make the prompt very elaborate.
Why is the delivery service concerned about the food quality at all? Post office is not concerned about quality of products it ships and I don't see anyone expecting it to be.
You should see the speedrunning videos on YouTube!
A little off-topic, but having used Raycast a little on a mac, I have to say that I wish there was react-native on Linux. It seems likes the react-native desktop project is maintained by microsoft, so there is no incentive for them to port this to linux, but what would it take to do that? Does anyone know? It seems to hinge on GTK and QT being hard to integrate with.
Whenever the person/website/news org saying something REALLY wants it to be true I am very skeptical.
If you read TFA it explains that they did consult their lawyer before and after, but that fighting them on it would cost more time and money than they could afford.
The killer feature for me is setting different scaling for different screens. This just works for me in wayland.
For clarification, are you arguing that promiscuous women lack self respect in general, or that it’s only in the case that they believe they need to for “self empowerment”?
Most people know that, but the narrative is just too good that he got pwned because he tried to pwn Greta. People want to believe it.
I mentioned science in the frame of evidence in a criminal investigation. It didnt come across as such. I fell asleep not too long after that comment.

> I do not think they are constantly told this.

I definitely have been told this. Major practices are called religion, whereas minor practices are just 'cult' and weird. The existing larger religons' congregants are the worst to demean me and my practices, all the whole doing it themselves. But no matter.

I didn't get into tarot until after I became a pagan. I had a whole string of 'strangely coincidential' things that happened to me and people around me that have no relation to how they would in science. And that includes doing private rituals, and 2 people who don't know each other, directly asking about them in detail. They both admitted they could see what I did.

Again, I recognize the extreme personal nature, and no proof. (In a way, it's similar to a ZKP where recording it and showing it after the fact gives no proof.)

> I wrote my comment with the hope that I can learn their scientific approach to tarot.

The mechanistic reading is the boring one. Basically you just read the book and apply the straightforward answer to the question based on the book descriptions.

An intuitive reading is when you get pictures in your mind, and feel senses that others can't. The only equipment I know can do this is an fMRI. I certainly cannot construct one, nor find someone who'd do occult/divinatory research. I'd be willing though.

As for my other backgrounds, I'm a cloud/systems engineer by profession, so I'm well aware of the scientific method, and how my pagan practices are mostly irreconcilable with my scientific and engineering upbringing. I would love to connect the 2 realms together, but given what I do, and the research lab and equipment required, is highly unlikely I ever will do that.
It sounds like that classic “focus on the things that can be measured easily” business finance attitude that causes things like “don’t kill your customers” to be missed.
I have actually used a (nice, high fidelity and sample rate) accelerometer as a mic. Rolloff is somewhere around 400Hz. Just popped the accel data into audacity and played it back.
They do "work", but the dynamic GPU switching is problematic, especially with Wayland. Especially when using external monitors. I could not have decent performance and heat/noise using external monitors.

You can (and really have to) stick to using X but multi-dpi monitor mixing there is problematic.

Also the KMS and tty management seems a bit buggy with Nvidia (even with early KMS).

And then even after you get all of this working "fine" with X or Wayland expect some random crashes of the desktop environment.

Then if you somehow survive the crashes, sleep mode is extremely unreliable, even when using the correct nvidia systemd hooks.

Not all of these are "driver" issues, but those are real life issues when trying to use multi-gpu laptops with Linux, when one of those GPU's come from Nvidia.

I also have Linux computers with Intel and AMD GPU's and that is a completely different story.
Because certain plants don’t transit well to urban areas and you can reduce waste and expense by growing them adjacent or in urban areas, providing fresher food for the same cost. That’s why they tend to grow delicate leafy greens.
It's not about optimal matches at all - it's about when to stop looking.

The assumption is you don't known the set of potential matches, or the order they come in, or anything really. But there is a deadline for the decision (or a maximum number of attempts). So how to balance making attempts to gather information with committing to a final decision so you don't run out of time? All else being equal, the rule is 1/e. Spend the first 37% of your time/attempts gathering information, then commit to the next option that's better than you've seen.

This doesn't guarantee a good match (or even a match!) but probabilistically the strategy is optimal.
It used to be far more common, waned over the last 2 decades, but now it's coming back into fashion. Generally, phones and tablets are often replacements for baby sitters, or more sadly, interacting with a child. The idea of plopping your kid infront of a TV or tablet for a couple hours "to calm them down" is very common. Some do it because they are tired, other because it is simply easy, among other reasons.
Idk man, I totally expected them to launch in 2022. They don't seem to have much confidence, or they would have done so. Especially since the "regulatory considerations" you mentioned include limits per year. Their production seems good enough that just disposing of them by test flight would be a win. So why no launch attempt, yet? Is risk not acceptable anymore since Artemis? Yeah, no bets from me for now, but will be interesting to see what happens.
3 is a dreadfully small sample size to call 2/3 biased.
Gnome (Linux) equivalent: https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/5072/one-thing/
I have never seen an ML researcher claim that understanding the effect of specific training inputs on outputs is straightforward given the size of these LLMs. Most view it as a very difficult if not impossible problem.
I like it at first glance but need to see more detail or play with it first before forming an opinion. But nice job keeping it simple at least makes me want to give it a go later. Definitely into the idea that better news aggregation is a good investment of time and materials. Good Luck with this !
At a minimum, it's a personal attack, which is against the site rules. It's also off-topic, in a way that's likely to hijack the thread.

But, yes, the negative emotional charge in that short a post is getting pretty close to flamewar.
> It's extremely unscientific, because it is not based in objectivity, but purely power dynamics of the narrative.

Neither the conspiracy theorists nor the scientific dogmatists are scientific.

Science is based on doubt. It's based on not accepting anything as true until you are convinced. To call questioning what you are being told unscientific is just bizarre. It's the most scientific thing you can do. The basic posture of science is skepticism, not conviction. You don't know until you're convinced.

If anything, the conspiracy crackpots are gaining a foothold because science is reduced to mere dogma. They may be wrong, but it's a mistake to think they are idiots.

Both the scientific dogmatists and the conspiracy theorists essentially make the same mistake. They're skeptics with regards to other peoples' convictions but refuse to consider challenges to their own beliefs.

A big reason why for example the covid conspiracies got such traction was that the official narrative was inconsistent and self-contradictory. It was presented as much more certain than it could have been. Good science takes a long time to produce. Preliminary results may take several quarters, good confidence comes after a couple of years. What we had in 2020 was mostly educated guesswork.

The most scientific thing would have been to stand in front of the press and say "honestly, dunno, come back in six months or so and we may have some workable data for you". But that's not what happened. Instead, their confidence was overstated (by governments, media), and official messages kept changing.

Countries all over the world were all confidently sticking to their strategy, claiming it to be scientific, yet at the same time they were opting for contradictory strategies with regard to high-visibility interventions like mask mandates and lockdowns.

It's also somewhat questionable how scientific this could have been, given scientific confidence typically comes after the data, and this was the first time such strategies has been implemented at a societal scale.

The most damning of all is that politically inconvenient hypotheses were confidently dismissed as fake news and crazy conspiracy ramblings without proper investigation, some of them later turned out to actually have credibility (such as the lab leak hypothesis[1][2][3] which was considered in the same tier as flat-earth at some point). Again, the scientific thing would be to say "I don't know if this is true, let's go and investigate".

All this looked bad specifically because a lot of things that weren't scientific at all were constantly paraded around under the banner of scientific certainty, which in turn fanned the flames of all manner of conspiracy theories because the doctrine was visibly self-contradictory and kept changing.

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01529-3
[2] https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1656
[2] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-lab-leak-hypo...
Vladimir Nesterov, Russian Angara rocket designer, dies mysteriously
If people rely on the LEDs working correctly or if the controller has any kind of connection to another system (which could be leveraged by an attacker to penetrate deeper into the network) it seems to me that security and memory safety would still be important.
> The reality is, to get the exact artifact which produced the code in question, you need "Call me Ishmael" from Moby Dick just as much as the Linux kernel source.

Not always. Sometimes it just copies code without modification.

It never tells you when it does that, though. So to be on the safe side, better assume that it always does.
I would think destructors would negate some of the performance advantages of GCs, since it's not possible to have zero-cost freeing of objects when destructors exist.
Was second prize a set of steak knives?