skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I see you're in Kansas. Why not sit this one out and let Californians worry about their state?
Check out the "Moral perspectives" section: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_and_the_Beanstalk

I think you're both right, the 1807 version published by Tabart added the moral justification for the killing of the giant which is still common today. But the story may originate in pre-history oral tradition, where it's anyone's guess whether or not Jack is a remorseless violent thief.
I was in a social network research laboratory. Some of the best people at the lab went into industry while the others did do post docs. The professor that worked at the lab also went to Microsoft Research. Honestly if you were to go the route of being a professor or from MANGA what would you choose? Also, I think there are laws and also rules within Universities that would preclude the study to capture value and even then you would have to hire data analysts that would be external to being a professor so I think it would be hard to compete with MANGA in that regard also.
Minute hand covers the hour hand which seems like it could be improved. I added a country and I couldn't see if it had been added because it was under the minute hand.
Cronie Captialism ~= Oligarchical Collectivism ?
If a struct might lose Copy you shouldn't implement Copy at all, to preserve forward compatibility. You can still derive Clone in most cases; using .clone() does not per se add any overhead.
I bet you could, depending how you pull/push the data. But were you thinking having the whole MMO in Google Sheets?
But if tomorrow JPM decides to invest like Kathy Wood and lose all the money, the renters will be without home equity and the JPM equity.
Ditto, that’s what Feedly does as well

Additionally, the social features the OP mentions are helpful in determining which RSS feed is the right one since some sites have multiple.
Yeah, checked mail server IP and it isn't the issue. Our users are marking the email as not spam, but they have to do it for every single email.

10 days after our mail started ending in Spam, our domain Authority decreased. It should have been the other way around (First Domain Authority should decrease and then mails should go to spam).
90 days should be the absolute minimum any human being should be expected to vacate their home (or receive a rent increase).
> It’s turtles. JPMorgan is publicly traded. The renter can just buy as many shares of it as he wants and pretend it’s his home equity.

Try asking your brokerage for $400,000 of margin at 5% on a $20,000 account and see what they say.

There's no financial instrument even remotely close to what a 30 year mortgage is for the average individual.
They are buying up existing land.
HN is full of some very intelligent people, but it's scary to see that even most of them are buying into the changing of the definition of "capitalism".
Make your types smaller
I moved into a house from From a mega rental. All the windows were open when we did The inspection. Had a massive chemical smell after we closed it up. Company kept making excuses about smell. Well in 3 months family suffered a whole series of strokes and other issues. Eventually found a gas leak. It didn’t have the rotten egg smell so took awhile to figure out.

Plus we just were gone mentally.

Doctors wouldn’t fill paperwork saying that high levels of toxic gas caused medical issues, so lawyers wouldn’t take the case.
My school did course evaluations every year, and I’m under the impression that the Professor’ performance is tracked in the sense that if somebody was failing too many students, it would be noticed. Beyond that, I’m not sure how one could evaluate teaching without also being a subject matter expert. So this seems more like the sort of thing that ought to be handled by the professor’s expert peers, than data people or administrators.
I think the problem is they'll have a highly concentrated group of units and can essentially price fix them. They won't be competing with themselves. And landlords love to raise prices when others do under the guise of "market rate". If you have a captive audience (e.g., surrounding a college), there's nothing renters can do about it other than move farther away.

Being single-family homes complicates the issue, too. We're not talking about high-density units, so the growing housing supply is fairly constrained. I don't see it being enough competition to lead to a pricing war. Meanwhile, it's taking away land that could have been used for home ownership, which will likely raise the value of other single-family homes in the area, movin home ownership even further out of reach for many.

I get that not everyone wants to own a home, but it's nice to have the option. If you're laying down roots, you can lock in a fixed-rate mortgage and have an asset. When renting from a megalandlord you're subject to the whims of quarterly earnings and your one year lease might not afford much protection. I think you're also discounting the cost and hassle of having to move when JP Morgan raises prices above the competition. It's very unlikely people will exit en masse, causing the landlord to adjust the rental price back down.

You might be fine with all of that, but ridiculing people because they're uneasy with the situation is not helping the discussion at all.
Behind every bullet is a solider taking a decision to pull the trigger. Ultimately, regardless of the orders given by their superior, it is that person who decides whether or not to kill someone. If you want to see this in action, go read up on Operation Red Wings. Out of a four man Navy SEAL team, it ultimately cost three of them their lives because they took the ethical decision not to kill three Afghan civilians even though they (correctly) suspected that the civilians would report their whereabouts to the Taliban and compromise their mission.

This is just one story of many. If you want to pretend the military is some black and white evil entity to help you sleep at night then go ahead. But it is simply not the reality. The reality is that it is a group of humans who each have to constantly weigh the tradeoffs of horrifically impossible decisions every single day.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_engagement

https://warontherocks.com/2017/07/when-can-a-soldier-disobey...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Red_Wings#Execution_...
> With modern CPU's having so many cores and threads being so cheap, couldn't NASA use these for redundancy?

Maybe? But CPU cost basically doesn't matter compared to launch cost. Power budget given the required computing needs during critical sections of the mission is probably the biggest priority after reliability. Modern cpus are good at compute/watt, but not necessarily at low watts at low load.

No idea re: feature size, for cosmic rays and dram, it was thought that shrinking beyond some point was going to increase failures dramatically, but then it was fine. But in space radiation is more than cosmic rays.
Ugh, you are right but then someone comes and uses this to rationalize not including things like map, filter and reduce in a language because they are supposedly too complicated and you can just do it with a for loop
I'll allow that my claim was strong for the amount of evidence proffered, but that does not decouple the changes to the election system from the results and the subsequent dismay of a substantial percentage of the State.

As we watch the #TwitterFiles unfold, and know that they represent the tip of a far larger crap-berg than anyone cares to face, please keep reminding me that the 2020 election was as perfect as Trump claimed his Zelelinskyy phone call was, for which Donald impeached.

Past the snark, let's simplify elections and make those casting the ballots, not those doing the counting, the most important.
TSMC's yields on early 3nm production are reportedly as high as 80%
Meh. Crypto is both a technology and a business. The business side of crypto is mostly, but not entirely, somewhere between pipe dream and scam.

But the underlying tech is useful and will make its way into traditional markets.
| But it made me not want to ever be a landlord as negotiating with people like that would be tough.

Well, well, if it isn't the consequences of my own opinions.
Oh good - an opportunity to use "begging the question" for its original meaning.

I don't see a single example of "success" in the article. (They said "We unexpectedly found a pervasive void of infrastructure thinking and a relatively limited set of data-informed planning successes" but I must have missed the successful example.)

So the entire article describes what they think should be done, without any successful examples to show that anything useful can be done in the first place.
Space is very irradiated, and direct sunlight is radiation itself. Anything you add there will be a drop in the ocean. Atmosphere is not sufficient to resolve space radiation, you need a magnetosphere.
I think the key is that everybody expected that technology would decrease the effectiveness of bullshitting. Local bullshitting relies on there being nobody in the room to say "BS" -- or at least, a small enough number that wishful thinking could dominate. And the bullshitter knew that their time was limited before somebody called them out.

The truth-tellers were expected to have an advantage: once the truth was seen, most people would recognize and accept it. The bullshitter's advantage was the slow speed of information diffusion.

Turns out that is wrong. People are regularly given definitive rejections of bullshit, and they deny them. It's not that they haven't seen it, but that they choose to accept the bullshitter's reality. We always expected to be able to fool some of the people all of the time... but we assumed that "some" was a number in the single-digit percentages, not a majority or near majority of the (connected, first) world.

I still don't know what to make of it. I'm pretty glum, to be honest. And I believe that's a lot of the point. I think that a lot of people choose to accept bullshit precisely because they think it hurts people they don't like. They may even grasp that it's false, but simply don't care. The negative consequences to them are sufficiently far off as to be dismissed, but the upside of having people angry at them is immediate.
I wonder if you turn this around, could every body have a tendency to be nasty 5% of the time?
This roughly matches my estimate of evil drivers on the road, people cutting lines violently and not using turning lights, pushing to insert on the right when they used the emergency lane to pass everybody in a slowdown...
Sure in that case, an efficient market would raise the rent to compensate.
https://archive.ph/rZ7LA
I just tested this and don't see that. I compared http://neverssl.com to running "python3 -m http.server" and visiting http://localhost:8000

* Chrome: "Not Secure" on neverssl, "i" in a circle on localhost

* Firefox: Padlock with a red line through it on neverssl, page icon on localhost

* Safari: "Not Secure" on neverssl, no message on localhost
Indeed, absolutely true. And furthermore, sometimes the value of data,
and of possible other sources, doesn't emerge until you start analysis
and then deductively see new collection opportunities. It's a
to-and-fro process.

> how much ROI does the insights in the data provide, relative to the
cost to build the organizational infrastructure

Having seen the workings of academia for a long time now I'd argue
very little.

But I think the problem is more subtle. A Heisenbergian problem. When
data collection involves people you have a triple problem of
intrusion, distraction, and ossification. the act of trying to create
a "data driven culture" in some contexts simply kills what's
there. The cost of this, in addition to the bootstrapping costs of
sensors and analytics are paralysing.

Academia, by its very nature, if properly functioning, demands to be
dynamic. If it's good, it will not stand still long enough for you to
look at it. And if you measure it "too hard" it will evaporate as all
the good people who resent ossification leave.
There was also the whole issue of older people being forced out of their homes due to the rising property taxes. Turns out they vote in high numbers.
Disposable Type.
I'm confused by this statement since podman is an included component due to being the underpinning of toolbox.
I really enjoyed reading this. It was mind-opening.

I wonder if in the future, something useful with practical applications will come out from this philosophy, and we'll look back to 2022 the same way we look back to geometers who tried to prove Euclid's fifth postulate.
My boomer relatives send me links all the time, so I refuse to believe they aren't aware that the audience one is currently addressing is not necessarily the audience that will ultimately judge one's words. But I can't think of any other explanation for Marcus to provide this pull quote?
The public information is plenty to justify marking down the value. The only question is how far.

The meaning is in the fact that Fidelity has people well placed to use public info to make good guesses about the market value. We can safely assume they're better at it than most of us.
CS50. Challenging, but definitely doable. A whirlwind tour through several languages and a good foundation.

I also enjoyed listening to the history lectures from U.C. Berkeley that are archived online.
Two things happened in my first week:

- Using the iOS Safari share button to “Open in NetNewsWire” would silently fail if the blog didn’t have a feed. I went looking for my feeds later and they were missing. I tried a few more times before realizing, “oh, there’s just no feed.”

- Some sites I found had multiple feed links (one per kind of post: long post, short fragments, photo posts). NetNewsWire would always pick the first link in the page, disregarding all others, and not telling me that the page had multiple.

We can say “discovery is not a problem” but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to ask for it to be better. Half the value proposition of sites like Substack is making it dead simple for readers to understand how they can subscribe.

As someone who had never used RSS before and didn’t know how to expect RSS to work, it was the problem that grated me the most. If discovery isn’t seamless, only the people determined to use RSS will stick with it after their friends pester them to try it out.
https://deltaoutpost.io/
Private ETH nodes, 2k MRR
In short, no.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Red_Wings
Obviously I’m 20 years past university and nearer being the paying parent, but why oh why should university “capture the value of data”. They should offer affordable education (if you believe in the value of tertiary education) and affordable signaling of abilities (if you don’t). A recent post by John Cochrane [1] somewhat pointed out the absurdity in US education, Stanford specifically. Stanford itself mentions 15750 non teaching staff members on
2288 professors. My kids K12 (EU) runs on about 6 administrators (excluding cleaning, but including all other staff) for 22 teaching staff, including upstream shared services in the city. In a high school the ratio is probably even better.

15750 administrators wanting to capture the value of data is just plain silly. (I’m going overboard here, but it’s about an order of magnitude of difference! I know of 50% differences in FTE/value in the market I work in, but x10…)

[1] https://johnhcochrane.blogspot.com/?m=1
I very much agree with you. This type of data collection MUST be opt-in to be ethical, and in Chrome it’s enabled by default and buried. The VAST majority of users have no idea this is even happening. It is grossly unethical and it is obvious that it is so, but unsurprisingly folks at Google are happy to do things like this given their salaries.
He conflates world class bullshitters with people who just speak off the cuff about things they don't know much about, or people who make predictions that turn out to be wrong, or even just people with whom he disagrees, but who are generally pretty earnest in their beliefs, right or wrong. These aren't the same, and it muddies the waters.

I agree that the most extreme cases of post-truth celebrity liars, while perhaps not a new phenomenon, may be parts, symptoms, or mechanisms of some new phenomenon that really deserves to be thoughtfully explored. But this article ain't that.
It uses vanilla gnome
Accuracy is best thought as relative, though the usage of percentages here is not a good fit imho. You compare your result to the wanted value by dividing the error by the value. In this case |x - √2|/√2 < 0.000001 (or 0.0001% if you insist)

For comparison, the initial value of the iteration (1.2) would be 85% accurate, which without context might sounds like a lot but is pretty abysmal
Refuting bullshit is a pain. If it takes more energy to refute bullshit than the energy used to create it, it gets frustrating, fast. Brandolini's Law[0] applies here.

> Brandolini's law, also known as the bullshit asymmetry principle, is an internet adage that emphasizes the effort of debunking misinformation, in comparison to the relative ease of creating it in the first place. It states that "The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it."

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini's_law
Would it be preferable for an individual to build a single family home on the land than a corporation build multi unit housing? Which does more to increase housing supply?
I purchased macbook in 2017, and during that time I got my laptop repaired by Apple Authorized Reseller / Apple Authorized Service Provider in 2020.

However, the keyboard worked for 6 months and I already passed that 4 years. The problem is I just went to the store they gave me 1 paper and they took the paper when I retrieve the laptop.

This website asks me for screenshots or documents. How am I supposed to provide that?
Suggest acquiring the needed knowledge instead of applying dogma. The true root of all evil is unexamined dogma.
> Safely borrowing things by reference is one of Rust's headline features

Sure, but it's worth noting that references in Rust do not exist merely to avoid passing by-value. They also exist to make it easier to deal with Rust's ownership semantics: they let you pass things to a function without also requiring the function to "pass back" those things as returned values. In other words, references let you do `fn foo(x: &Bar)` rather than `fn foo(x: Bar) -> Bar`. This is a unique and interesting consequence of languages with by-default move semantics.
At the VERY end of the article, the author points out "Oh, btw, I used MSVC for the C++ compilation, when I used clang things changed!"

So, what the author actually measured was the difference between llvm and msvc throughout the article. Particularly when they talked about rust being better at autovectorization than C++.
I have a small server with a BTRFS raid

Syncthing some, rsync others, going to test Borg

Also have a 2.5 4TB HDD, where I backup again important data

I don't encrypt any backup

I am more afraid of lose data irrecoverably than someone having local access to it
You can see if there's a feed referenced in the page you're on by simply doing `curl <your page>|egrep rss\|xml` or just show source.
As far as I know default android already has that functionality, or maybe it's just Samsung's ROM?
Canaries exist, because you cannot talk about the reasons for their removal. You just remove them.
Sounds cool, would you care to link the make/model?
I'm not assuming.

When I say "guarantee", I mean the code is designed so the first 8 bytes are always mapped.

When I say "runtime length check", I mean the code only runs if the first 8 bytes are in fact mapped.

No assumptions. No possible way to segfault. The read is valid.

If buffer[6] is not mapped, then you don't "legitimately have the buffer length".
There's no need for a dick measuring contest, there are plenty of life-like benchmarks available online that show Python is agonizingly slow.

> I bet I'll build it faster with pure Python.

What? We're talking about runtime speed, not development time...
More often I'd say they're on the side of all local landlords, not necessarily megalandlords specifically. But your point is correct and I have yet to see a city council that wasn't stacked with property investors.
So true. I take this as an aid towards my customer support approach. I guess it’s a good idea to include a slide on the onboarding process where we mention this and give some tips into how to deal with this in the most respectful, yet decisive way.
All of this in Ireland - and much more beside.

Successive Ministers for Housing have dramatically under-built social housing, every year, for decades. This, while a "housing emergency" has been recognised for near as long.

These failures are used to justify things like the HAP scheme, which subsidize landlords directly. If this seems stupid - you're right. Many have pointed this out, but the politicians and landlords and developers responsible don't see any issue.

We sometimes subsidize developers to the tune of tens or hundreds of millions, just so we can rent the future property off of them, at above market rate, for decades. And we give it back afterward!

We allow developers to lobby the Government on policies that will make housing less affordable for young people.

Sometimes we just straight up give them €150,000 taxpayer cash per unit, to build "unprofitable" €450,000 units.

All this, while we have all time high homelessness rates, with hundreds of thousands more Irish adults living on friends couches.... While State homelessness organizations accuse charities who question this of "virtue signalling".

Even our constructions materials companies are staggeringly corrupt, eg, CRH (https://villagemagazine.ie/a-history-of-scandal/). They're widely known among Irish people to be criminal, and have been for a long time. See the mica blocks scandal for another example. Yet somehow they all keep getting lucrative contracts. No one is ever punished. And every time there's a big documentary planned about their various mafia type scams, it gets pulled. "Orders from up top".
People who architect systems know that there can be value from a management layer, especially where scalability is a concern.

People who look at history often see unions becoming a solution in search of a problem.
It's perhaps worth noting that in excess of 5% of the populace have one form of mental disability or another.

ADHD alone is estimated to be a disorder present in 5% of the adult population (2% are currently diagnosed; the 5% is based off childhood diagnosis rates and the fact it usually doesn't go away when becoming an adult).

And while those with ADHD are unlikely to populate the OP's 5%, those with pathological narcissistic, sociopathic, schizophrenic (and other) disorders very well could.