skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because people have food allergies, and should have a right to know whether or not the food they're consuming has been cross-contaminated by allergens?

How did we end up in a place where the companies aren't putting the cross-contamination ingredients in the ingredients list, and instead put them in a non-standard warning label.
2FA exists because sometimes ne'er do wells get your password. Phishing, guessing weak passwords, password reuse from sites that are hacked, the list goes on.
the retort comes up because charging egregiously to use public roads that they're all paying for with their tax money makes no sense.
Yes we allready knew that most part of europe is having great bread and british or us bread is an insult to humanity
Is this true even if you account for the fact that cities can reclaim lanes and buildings dedicated for parking?

I would think that a lot of congestion is related cars having to be parked near a specific venue such as a restaurant or an arena (especially in the latter case where there is a gathering of 1000+ people).
> You can make anything resizeable so long as it’s not an inline element and it has overflow: hidden;.

Correction on the last part: so long as it’s not `overflow: visible`. Doesn’t need to be `overflow: hidden`, and indeed my experience is that you normally want `overflow: auto` on resizeable things.

Also “anything” is inaccurate: you mostly can’t use it with replaced elements like img/audio/video/iframe, though it varies by browser (e.g. my recollection is that resize works on iframe in Blink but not Gecko).
There are societal reasons why this won’t be accepted by the public. It’s sort of analogous to allowing the rich to pay for a higher spot on an organ donor waitlist, in theory it is economically efficient but in practice it is unfair and will cause outrage.

Lots of good discussion on this idea here: https://www.econtalk.org/michael-munger-on-traffic/
Please consider waiting for one day, before re-trying with your valid password.
Your account will be auto-unlocked after a cool-off period.

It helped me in the past.
That doesn't necessarily answer the question of how crypto would help DNS though.
On the use of spyware in government backed software
You can balance the real dual-interests at play here through progressive taxation, allowing for transfers of wealth that only marginally accelerate society-wide wealth disparity. The slaves/serfs lingo is a little stretched when it applies necessarily to other people, and those other people have had their entire lives to benefit from the wealth of the other person anyways.
It's not a slippery slope. There's a small list of known deadly allergens. Those need to be taken seriously.
Really? Do you find Uber and Lyft to be affordable or a financially sensible means of regular transportation?
I mean, that’s comparing one figure, which came from who-knows-where, to one new study; it’s not hugely convincing. Especially as at least the new figure is via self-reporting.

One thing I think people forget with this stuff, 50 years ago many people just weren’t exposed. I live in Ireland; when my grandparents were kids everyone in the country could’ve been allergic to sesame and no-one would have noticed; it just wasn’t part of the food culture.

Now, it is. In general, particularly in rural areas, most peoples’ diets were extremely restrictive until pretty recently; in industrialised countries people are exposed to a lot more variety than a couple of generations back.
> I just want either a zoom constant so we can know how much the browser is zoomed in or out

So that zooming in on websites has unexpected side effects like some elements ignoring the zoom and staying the same size?

When users zoom they want everything to maintain the same proportions but be larger on their display, but web developers in their infinite wisdom want to do clever stuff when a user zooms so that isn't their experience.

What is a non-abusive use case for this?
> Time and effort make no guarantee of the result.

True enough! Growing things successfully is all about education. Actually growing what you grew might have been next to free with the right know-how (composting and natural alterations for good soil, harvesting seeds from organic foods, natural pest control, etc). But of course you don't know that until you get years worth of education!
> Eludes me why anyone ever gives a shit about small businesses.

Because today's small businesses can become tomorrow's large businesses. Each new rule is a barrier to entry. Here, for example, zero-contamination rules for sesame would make it impossible for a small business to make both sesame-containing and sesame-free products unless they can afford an entirely separate production line or long deep-cleaning periods between runs. Large business, large enough to have simultaneous production lines, can rearrange production more easily to avoid disruption.

With a large-enough regulatory fortress, incumbent businesses protect themselves from competition, losing that very "progress" that you champion.
Perhaps you could require an organic farmic certificate or something, rather than a promise. At a vary least such certificate should in theory prohibit from using anything harmful to the environment. I got one, but mainly for higher subsidies.
Because mining, staking, and various consensus protocols along those lines are useless for these applications?

Or maybe worse. A blockchain is a distributed system and is subject to the CAP theorem. And they handle it pretty badly: they are global and they are utterly intolerant of network partitions. They handle consistency by throwing out conflicting transactions, which is probably not what you want for something like supply chain visibility.

Just use a database.
Familiarize with Fair Trade practices (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_trade_coffee), get in contact with other bean growers, like Equal Exchange as someone else mentioned. Consider operating as a co-op where the workers are actually owners too. I get the sense this industry is pretty fraught with worker abuse problems regardless but at least try to be on the right side of things.
I think claiming it "will never be delivered" is probably wrong as well.
It reminds me of how communists on Twitter will go on about how their job in the forthcoming communist utopia will be to teach part time classes on intersectional poetry and spend the rest of their time wandering the forests to connect with the earth.
No, the intent of the law was to make it easier for people (and parents of people) with sesame allergies to find and select foods to eat. By incentivizing manufacturers to add sesame to everything, the unintended consequence is to make their lives much harder.
> I am not sure what stops you from using a wrapper script (in Python, portable) and invoking it as a custom target

Nothing, when applicable this works and we're doing it already, thank you.

But it doesn't as soon as one needs to abstract over CMake commands themselves (like add this target, set that target property, add this test and so on). Of course we could try to generate CMake files in wrapper scripts, but this is another level of CMake juggling entirely.

> CMake is quite more frustrating.

Could not agree more.

But even more frustrating than CMake programming is Meson checking almost all the boxes yet refusing to provide that last one bit of functionality that would make me switch to it (and giving a wrong justification for it).
What do you mean, obviously if the status dashboard is green, nothing is wrong. /s

Who are you going to believe, me, or your own lying eyes?
That's not the same. Everyone can buy a raffle ticket, you can't randomly re-select your parents.
> Say you need to fertilize the trees. When is the right time? What is the right amount? How many people do you need to fertilize 8000 trees in time?

You experiment. It takes a lot of time, yes, but it’s not that difficult.

I find your answer and many other here overly pessimistic and unkind. Not every thing is about hustling a business to perfection and on the first try.
What do you mean they gave it away? I don't have a linked number to my GV anymore I just use it for 2fa codes... Is that not safe?

Edit: MAKE YOUR NUMBER PERMANENT if you don't want to lose it due to 6 months inactivity. It's 20$. Also ported numbers are never recycled. I am happy with GV and will always use it.
It's N, from what I recall from my rotary mobile:

https://www.stavros.io/posts/irotary-saga/
My wife has been allergic to Sesame for as long as she can remember. It's always a struggle not only because it is less known than peanuts, but it's also very easy to hide it in all sorts of foods -- intentionally or accidentally.
You can pay a bribe to opt out of security theater. No naked scanner, shoes on, laptop stays in bag.

Pre check lasts five years and my free credit card reimburses the fee.

The card also gives me a free checked bag (which I rarely use). I pack in a roller bag which I often gate check.

Still no water through tsa which is retarded. Guys, just sniff it. Or better yet make the traveler take a big swig. Anything dangerous isn’t even going to make it to the metal detector let alone on the flight.
CoreFreq, a CPU monitoring software frequencies, ratios, C-states
My point is they could simply add 'traces of sesame' to the ingredient list without actually delberately adding sesame.
The current theory is that allergies exploded because our (first) world is too clean and the immune system needs something to do, so it focuses on what it can find - peanuts.
I don’t think Tesla wants to release a “FSD” that only works in part of one single city. Phoenix is easy-mode for self driving vehicles which is why Waymo is able to do what they do.
There’s no real concern because AoC is just for fun. Cheating has always been easy but AoC isn’t a serious competition.

No one is going to get a job because of their AoC score, they’ll get a job because they have the knowledge and skill to complete the problems though.
Yep, he deferred to the programmers for technical decisions.
Why Twitter abandoned view counts back in 2015, when first they tried it
Ooh I know! By cross-contaminating for a long time without consequences. People fight for these disclosures for a reason.

If you convince people it makes you fat, you will see sesame-free products next to gluten-free products. Gluten-free is for hot thin people, allergens are for broken disposable people.
Thank you for your response.

Alas, I think they're going to be able to find ways to make the "free publicity" harmful. These people are petty, but they're not stupid. I'm expecting GPT-written negative reviews (which will drown out the positive ones) and various chatter on social media that redirects any discussion of the work to discussion of the author and what he may or may not have done (nothing illegal, but stupid shit that's really embarrassing) 20 years ago. I know they're going to try to raise a cancel mob. They did it in 2015 over my (ill-considered) use of one word. I was using it as a regular trash insult, but a bunch of people got paid $75 a post to misrepresent my intentions on social media, and it ended up costing me job opportunities.

I used to believe that "there's no such thing as bad publicity", but that isn't true. If you get a negative review in good faith by, say, the New York Times, that's not going to hurt you financially at all. (Emotionally, it might.) Critical or even negative publicity that comes in good faith does tend to help you in the long run. On the other hand, if you get 100 low-effort negative reviews on Goodreads by people who've never read the book, your average drops into 1.x or 2.x territory and you're done. To the rest of the world, it just looks like you wrote a bad book. And if someone drums up a cancel mob, it can get really bad really quick.

The book isn't about the people are going to attack it. It's an unrelated novel. They're going to attack it because they're vindictive, not because there's anything in there for them to fear. They might be afraid that if the book succeeds and I become famous, I use my "platform" to go after them in the future. (It isn't really my plan, but I understand their paranoia, as I must sound a bit paranoid myself.) The book itself isn't going to "shed light on" them, though, as that's not its purpose. I'd rather forget entirely that they exist.

I'm playing defense here because offense isn't really a possibility. Some of these people, I know exactly who they are. Most of them are people who work for those people (or who did) whose names I don't even know. One of the guys who was stupid enough to attack me under his real name is some dork in Seattle (I'm on the east coast) who claims to have worked with me even though we've never met.
The way to avoid harsh political discussions is to talk about systems. it will be easier to have a nuanced, still political, discussion.

When someone engage the discussion on Twitter, and that start in a 'this group is X, this group is Y', start talking about what is Twitter, what it should be, how it would work, advertising, multinational reach and soft power implications.

Do the same thing for Biden, Trump or the election. Talk generic instead of specifics, systems rather than persons. Power structure rather than personal power.
>Not exactly. A business that produces no products containing sesame will not have risk of even trace contamination, so it would have every incentive to not include "may contain sesame" on the label.

But that was already the case, that's the point. If a business produces certified/assured allergy free food, then they can advertise that as an explicit product feature, and those who need it (or those buying on their behalf or with them in mind) can then pick it out vs competitors. That's "white list" in action, by default things aren't medical grade, and consumers can be confident in those that claim they are.

>Allergies are weird in that a "plain and obvious" production process would probably be fine. A normal breadstick, made at home, would probably not contain sesame flour and thus would be perfectly safe. However, efficient industrial production results in not-strictly-necessary cross contamination and unexpected allergen exposure.

My understanding from family with serious allergies is that this definitely isn't true. Real effort needs to be made avoiding cross contamination in a home kitchen too, and indeed cross contamination at home is more, not less likely because most people are much more casual and have less space and equipment. Unless it's an allergy sufferers home (or their family) and there simply aren't any allergy ingredients there at all. But that merely makes the home a "dedicated facility" in essence too.

>Since allergies can lead to deadly-if-not-treated anaphylactic reactions, isn't this an argument for whitelisted ingredients?

No? Banning sesame (or peanuts, or dairy, or a vast array of other potential allergens) in general is unacceptable to an overwhelming supermajority of the population. It's not a reasonable accommodation, and in a democracy it's not happening. Whitelisting products is the solution. Ensure that anything labeled as allergen free is, and then that anyone with the need can get access to it.
This is probably the #500 post on HN that reads "help I've been locked out of my Google account for Kafkaesque/inexplicable reasons and I have nobody to reach out to".

If you're still using Google products as your primary drivers, then it's entirely your fault.

Do yourself a favour in 2023: drop Google and all the filthy excrement that they produce. There's plenty of much better alternatives, and from a purely market-based perspective Google deserves to rot in hell for all of its sins and shitty products.
One of the main costs is labor. Another is fuel. Get rid of labor and if fuel gets cheaper (I assume electricity, because it can come from more sources than gas, will get cheaper over time), then I assume these services will be cheaper. Plus, car ownership is not that cheap either.
Car traffic has very different physics than that of people walking in a popular area.

The flux of the number of vehicles, as you increase the number of vehicles on the road, starts out going up as one would expect. But at a certain point, adding more cars on a road starts slowing down the movement. And then as more cars come on the road, the flux goes down, there is less road capacity as it get more crowded. This is the fundamental diagram of traffic flow:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_diagram_of_traffic...

So once cars on the road exceed that peak amount of flux, there's a phase change and cars start backing up.

So with cars, gridlock really does mean that far far fewer people get serviced by a chunk of road. Whereas with people in a busy area, there really are more people there.
The feature is impossible to implement with the sensor suite that comes with the car.
HN is a forum with a lot of people in it with different opinions.

Speaking as one of those who's always disliked Tesla and been turned off by Musk, one explanation is that the skeptics now feel more empowered to speak out than they did before. Also, depending on how far back you're talking, you may be overestimating how much unadulterated love there was for it before: I've been following conversations on Tesla here for years, and plenty of other vocal skeptics have been here for as long as I have.
Make sure you are comparing the same thing.

Several times here and elsewhere I've seen comments from Europeans mentioning they use 5-6 kWh per day which is average to a little above average for their country and wondering how Americans average 29 kWh per day.

Almost invariably, when I cannot figure out how the heck one can get by on 5-6 kWh per day, since I use at least 10 kWh in the early summer when it is warm enough to need no air conditioning and cool enough to not need any cooling or fans and ask for details, I get the same answer.

That answer is that they are using gas for house heating, water heating, clothes drying, and cooking, leaving only a computer or two, a fridge, a few lights, and maybe a TV to be powered by electricity. Americans are far more likely to have an all electric household.

When comparing energy use instead of just electrical use Americans still average higher then Europeans but it is no longer a huge difference.
SpinQ Introduces Trio of Portable Quantum Computers
To explain your comment a bit: It should be 0 day AND a rootkit, not OR. Plus the rootkit is not always needed or possible.

Also the people talking about “burning zero days”… every time you use an exploit (ignoring the exact meaning of 0 days) it doesn’t become burned by the first person. The hacker could use it on hundreds of people before it’s discovered and patched by whatever software it targets. That could take months.
Water. Cost per joule is really good so long as you have room for the large insulated tank.

You can use a heat pump to bring the water up to 180 degF, a fail safe mixing valve to use it to produce 120deg water for the baths and taps, and a heat exchanger for radiant heating loops.

It's much more cost effective than batteries to the extent that your energy use is driven by heating demands. If the tank is inside the building envelope the lost heat from imperfect insulation still heats the space too.
More like 'Fools Self Driving'.

Hardly surprising that action has been taken over FSD, especially the robo-taxi claims and the deceptive advertising over this alleged safety-critical system proven to be unsafe and putting other drivers on the roads at risk. As I have previously said before. [0]

So not a surprise here that many are realising that FSD is a complete scam and is being investigated by regulators and lawmakers for its false claims and misleading advertising.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28000436
People always bring up this idea that future generations will think it is “insane” to drive your own car. Will everyone in the future be very scared children in a far left monoculture? I just think people are more complicated than that. I think if people are really like that we will have very fragile humans.
I think it’s substantially unlikely that all of the cars sold with FSD will be capable of using whatever Tesla settles on — between processing power and sensor differences in their lineup, feels like they’d have to hamstring the software a fair amount to make it work fleet wide. Maybe not?
I eh.. was not up to date, I blame our office Christmas party. I guess I'm moving our organization over next year..
No:

(a) it only works on elements whose parents are the full viewport width, such as the body (simplifying the rules a little—there’s much finer nuance to the interpretation of percentages), and most of the places you might want viewport units aren’t suitable; and

(b) that’s literally just a longwinded way of writing “100%”, because mathematics.
You’re correct, self driving cars are not going to reduce traffic. A car has an average of 1.5 passengers in it while driving and it spends some 95% of its time parked.

Because they’re low/single occupancy vehicles and everybody is trying to get to and from work at approximately the same time you still need to have capacity for every single person at peak time. Any temporary reduction in traffic is immediately filled up by an increase in demand.

Just look at the last 50 years of urban development of the United States and tell me adding a few more lanes it’s gonna fix anything. Lyft is basically a self driving car if you squint, and it did nothing.

Throw in a couple trains and some busses people actually want to take, and you might actually solve the problem.

I have yet to see a plausible explanation for how self-driving cars are to reduce traffic.
Or just how well they designed it
It's complicated to say. It makes getting stuck in traffic less bad as you can do other things, so that tend to increase it. But it also means less traffic consisting of cars cruising around looking for a parking spot in places where that's an important source of traffic. So I expect it to make traffic in LA worse but traffic in New York better based on those. Ideally you'd also have more multi-modal trips, taking the train most of the way to your destination and being picked up by a self driving car when you get there. That requires infrastructure investment, though, so won't happen quickly.

The biggest change, I think, would be less need for so much parking in so many places. I don't think you could get cities all the way down to just 1 parking spot per car but we could get it down quite a ways and get it out of central business districts.

EDIT: Oh, and with regards to that study, the fraction of the time a rideshare car is going to spend driving between customers as opposed to with customers is going to scale with the fraction of people using rideshare. The more trips are rideshare the more likely it is that on completing a ride any given car will find a new rider nearby as opposed ot far away. You would have issues like daily commutes everybody is going the same direction. But in that case adding more traffic in the other direction isn't as much of a problem as the vehicle kilometers would suggest.
Did anything change? I was downvoted for calling out Musk as dangerous (...) unstable and unethical sociopath with so called "self driving" car a year ago[1] just as I was downvoted for pointinug out FSD is a myth just one day ago[2].

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29750109

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34105214
Yes, the political challenge of getting massive wealth redistribution passed in conjunction with public opposition to giving up the luxury of personal cars means the probability of the US ever getting its transit situation in order is very low until energy prices rise high enough to force a change.