skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Many people have had the idea that fascism will only be able to make entrance into America under a different name and guise. And most likely then disguised as anti-fascism.

And currently it seems fairly clear.

I don't think most of the historical left should be equated with the modern left. To me it seems a different beast altogether. The modern left is mostly created or lead on by the upper classes, spreading divisiveness and authoritarianism in the ranks of the less fortunate, with the rather obvious goal to keep and expand power and control.
Like most systems, it’s all about how it is setup. I’ve learned over 5-7 years how to organize FE (with redux) code so it is readable. Also inheriting a system can be quite the burden and I could see how it was be difficult to grok.

I also heavily leverage https://github.com/neurosnap/robodux to treat redux as a database.

At the end of the day, redux is an event emitter (pub/sub) with a single object that stores all of your state that multiple components need to reuse.
Who said that the exploited labor had to be in your country?

Does everyone have collective amnesia about Nike’s SE Asian sweatshops, or the hazardous working conditions in Bangladeshi garment factories that manufacture the most of our cheap fashion (the most glaring example being the Tazreen Fashion factory fire [0]).

Someone, somewhere is getting screwed out of fair wages for the corporation to make its profits.

0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Dhaka_garment_factory_fir...
D's main strength is its metaprogramming capabilities. It's memory safety features are very strong as well.
It's officially recommended in Denmark:
"Based on a precautionary principle, we recommend aspiration before injection."

https://en.ssi.dk/news/epi-news/2021/no-19-21---2021
Right after the election, we learned that the employment numbers turned out to be cooked (https://www.cnbc.com/video/2022/12/22/philadelphia-fed-sugge...) that was in large part the justification for the rate hikes, I think they end in the next few months and start to decline this year.
Well, you are both showing that you know it is illegal, yet asking "what would be the consequences ?". Of course if you get caught you would both have your hardware confiscated and experience a very severe fine (and possibly worse than just a fine if there were consequences in terms of interferences).

People who operate radars (in particular radars for weather forecasts) are now really upset of the recurring interferences that come from wifi devices with (illegally) disabled DFS. Keep in mind that weather forecasts is not only about consumer people watching TV to know whether tomorrow will be sunny or rainy, but is also safety-related (e.g. for flights and navigation. You don't want your flight to be caught in a storm !).

Those issues (significant interferences that are now almost impossible to solve) are periodically raising debates within RF administrations about whether to require locked hardware (locked bootloader and signed firmwares) in order to ensure that DFS cannot be disabled. That would be a pity for any embedded linux geek (openwrt is great both with regards to freedom, privacy, long-term support with security updates and therefore avoiding obsolescence, etc.), but a lot of people now think that it is the only way...

I understand the shortcomings of DFS, yet you should really understand the 5 GHz wifi band is a band dedicated to radars as primary users where wifi has been tolerated under the condition of DFS, so wifi users should really not complain too much about the consequences and limitations of DFS (if there was no DFS, there would be no 5 GHz wifi band at all ! ;)
The cognitive dissonance of this reply is astounding. Do you really not understand the difference between free speech and forcing people to platform views they don't want to? Why does your cohort want to force MIT to allow Nazis to march through their campus, but not force a baker to bake a cake for a gay couple?

See my previous comment on why.
No, what was said is that ~15% of the student body is in the top 1%. The top 5% by income make up 42% of the student body. I'm not sure about your own definition but I wouldn't qualify that as middle class.

I don't view 95% of the population making up 58% of the student body as an indicator that we're doing things particularly well. Especially when you don't ignore the fact the bottom 20% make up only 3.8% of students and the bottom 60% of the population only account for 18%.

These statistics fly in the face of any belief in meritocracy, social mobility, access to education, academic achievement etc. They imply either the children of the top 5% are genetic superhumans or that, as a society, we're failing spectacularly at living up to those goals.
Ugh- I thought that when it said spoilers ahead, it would be just the movie being reviewed in the article, which I don’t plan on seeing. Then there were spoilers for other movies (Get Out) that I intend to watch sometime.
How old are you kids? Can you incorporate them into your hobbies?

Sometimes I have to force myself to take a little time and remember that these times are impressionable to my kids. They are gonna remember holidays. Maybe not perfectly but the gist them.

What did we value? Spending time with them? Something else?

It can be a good (but hard) thing to disengage and remember what’s important.
I've been working on a large React + Mobx codebase for nearly 3 years now, and it's still holding up surprisingly well. Mobx is really well designed and plays nicely with React. I haven't encountered anything more appealing than this combo yet (Admittedly I haven't tried Vue yet)
Anything I have ever written, until I've re-read it.
Apples are very filling.
It's nice that it offers 8/16GB of RAM. I could actually use one for work.
Perhaps I'm oversimplifying, but if this neglect results in independent random events of destruction of these individual small things, it'll average out, so it's fine as long as they can be replaced
The changing world order aside, there’s a big difference between relevant planning and worthless fantasizing. I personally benefit the most from imagine conversations with friends with whom I want to cultivate friendships. A good conversation over coffee can be greatly bolstered by thinking about how to steer a conversation towards mutual interests beforehand.
I get what you're saying here but it's an entirely different argument than saying subjective experience has no value. It comes across as so unwilling to acknowledge the inward experience of others as to appear almost insufferably unempathetic.
Is this here because Miles Bron is an anagram for Elon is Mr B? "It’s practically a hit piece on Elon Musk" yeah duh, author must be a real smart one. Don't usually see movie reviews here otherwise. I thought it was pretty good, quite funny at times, fun mystery. I liked first one better but by no means was it bad.
I think another possible evolutionary reason may be preventing rogue drones.

A rogue drone that can sting repeatedly is a huge risk to a hive since security screening is only enforced at entrance and the rogue one(s) are inside the hive. This way, with the one-shot stingers, the worst possible damage is the loss of another bee, and the problem drone has taken care of itself.

What's your take on that hypothesis?
Modern C is full of various extensions. This makes it a fair bit more complicated than it appears. C is also missing key simplicity features - like modules and forward referencing.
My first reaction was “wow, what?” - but after reading the link you provided, it seems this was a plan B and a safeguard in case actual ministers would get sick.

“Mr Morrison only used the powers of his appointments once: to refuse an application for a petroleum exploration licence, PEP-11, using powers as head of the Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources.”

Thanks for giving the link but please don’t overexaggerate :)
If you believe you have the best ideas with the best evidence backing them and find you can’t reach and convince people with the plethora of modern communications tools, I’d spend at least as much time examining possible faults in your beliefs as I would the possible faults in communications.
Also in the Soviet Union most people publishing and spreading unsanctioned works, did so because they did not propagate the blessed and (therefore) popular views of the party. How strange.
longer than 4 years is normal, expected even, but when you start going into >7 years it gets...weird.
yep: not enough of a market, which is probably true at this point

we were straining to make the book fit into what the publisher wanted, so this gives us a good opportunity to write the book that we want
I would say "Thank you for reassuring me that even though this is a problem affecting my heart, which on the face of it sounds super-scary, it actually isn't all that threatening". (Well, probably I wouldn't be so explicit, and probably I would first ask some questions about what they meant by "passing nuisance". And I might be annoyed that a medical professional treating me was using dismissive-sounding language about something I found distressing, but obviously that particular annoyance isn't relevant when it's Some Guy On The Internet talking about it in the abstract.)
I don’t understand why modern day astronauts don’t wear three piece suits.
These bans weren’t under “their existing TOS”. The policy was rewritten after banning @elonjet to justify it retroactively.

The bans weren’t 12 hours. They were eventually announced as week-long ones; Musk backed down after backlash and his public poll resulted in a “unban now” vote.
> basically eligible for the notice period, which is 2 weeks

That depends on the contract. 2 weeks might be typical for a US contract but it can certainly vary.

> You could perhaps sue for other losses due to breach of contract but it wouldn't be wrongful dismissal and it would be a major departure from the British way of doing things.

I'm sorry I don't know where you get this idea of 'the British way of doing things' I've lived here my whole life and I've never heard this. Regardless, it doesn't constitute an argument. Consequential loss is absolutely a thing.
>the popular resistance to your unpopular ideas may simply be proof that they do not have merit?

No matter how many people believe the earth is flat or the sun circles around the earth, it won't make it true. We have day and night cycles because earth is a sphere that is rotating so that only one side of earth is exposed at the same time.

No matter how unpopular this opinion is and no matter how big the mob's desire to lynch me is, it is still closer to the truth than the potentially popular opinion of earth being flat and the sun circling around the planet.
Regarding mainline: No, not really - but I think we're in for a decent future with much-expanded mainline support.

The difference between the bastardized stuff from the Pi Foundation and everyone else's is that the former has enough momentum behind it that it's safe to assume it doesn't simply wither away, which makes enough difference for me not to experiment with others that almost certainly will. (I have a small drawer full of SBCs without any remaining software support at home from a past where I did not live/buy by that standard.)
You should see if the SRD (25mW) channels are allowed in Switzerland. They are not in BAKOM's WLAN factsheet, but I think they are supposed to gradually align with ETSI/ECC, so I expect they will eventually become available.

They are low power, but unused, so they perform well.
We can just find more reserves, no? Reserves have gone from 13m to 22m between 2010 and 2022[1] and I don't know of any reason they'd cap out there.

[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/1253739/lithium-reserves...
You will know which Country we are talking about, before you even click to see the Map...
The "cat" that ate the mouse? If so, a clever reverse dig at Jobs? (it did seem like there was bad blood there)
“It’s the same, except it isn’t” is gonna be a tough treason prosecution.
Iran protests: “No going back” as unrest hits 100 days
Nope.

From TFA:
“But just as chip production bloomed, demand withered, thanks to falling sales of pcs and smartphones.”

The narrative is apparently backed by data. Where’s the data for your counternarrative
4.5yo and very strong-willed. It’s hard to get her to do anything she doesn’t think she wants to do.
Experiences of Listening to Icaros During Ayahuasca Ceremonies
No, that isn't necessary, apparently all you need is propaganda. Once everyone believes it, you don't need to prove anything according to yawpitch.
As yes, CPUs, those things famously bought because of the software that runs it. Certainly not because of any fabrication advances by a given company, hohoho. All tech is software!
What it brought to mind for me was John Adams' "China Gates".
Is there a way to know how often DFS are sent in your zone?
Ask HN: What will you suggest to fresh students of programming in 2023?
Someone has taken a new year's resolution of learning the skill of programming in a serious way. What will be your suggestions to them? Do you want them to keep in mind some specific advice, books, MOOCs, etc?

Help them get into this beautiful world.
To clarify,

free speech !== discrimination

The argument is, as I understand it, self-expression even in the form of discrimination is protected. If it's not, then that leaves 1A venerable.

The foundation left by the Founders is complicated. Yes, sometimes that looks like hypocrisy. Similar is the left's anti-gun / pro-abortion stances.
I do not see any reason to think FED will pivot in a 2-3 y horizon.
I just want higher-kinded types to be supported. There is an issue[1] about this which has been pending for 8 years.

1. https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/1213
Also on "religious Other", compare John Milton:

> The vocabulary of seventeenth-century propaganda had a strident tone which is, perhaps unfortunately, getting to be characteristic of the twentieth century. The following epithets sound like an American Legion description of Communists, or a Communist description of the Polish democrats, yet they were applied in a book by a Lutheran to Quakers. The title of the tirade reads, in part:

... a description of the ... new Quakers, making known the sum of their manifold
blasphemous opinions, dangerous practices, Godless crimes, attempts to subvert
civil government in the churches and in the community life of the world; together
with their idiotic games, their laughable action and behavior, which is enough to
make sober Christian persons breathless, and which is like death, and which can
display the lazy stinking cadaver of their fanatical doctrines....

In its first few pages, the book accuses the Quakers of obscenity, adultery, civil commotion, conspiracy, blasphemy, subversion and lunacy. Milton was not out of fashion in applying bad manners to propaganda. It is merely regrettable that he did not transcend the frailties of his time.

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/48612/48612-h/48612-h.htm#Pa...
Again, you seem to miss the point. The hierarchy of importance does not matter in determining if it's a public good. Nobody is making the point that all public goods are of equal importance. Your personal stance also does not determine whether society deems it a public good. You seem weirdly hung up on a point that is altogether centered on what seems to be your own personal definition. Something can be a low priority or non-essential or not economically viable and still be a public good. You seem determined to have an entirely different conversation but it seems to blind you to the actual points being made. Again, to answer your question, we got from stadiums to police because they are both arguably public goods worthy of tax dollars. That's not to say they are equivalent in utility or that every thinks they are worth the tax dollars spent. If you want to shoehorn a libertarian argument into the discussion it can be done in a more germane approach.

Also, please review the HN guidelines.
I don't know if you know this: In a topos in which Countable Choice holds, the Cauchy reals are isomorphic to the Dedekind reals. In other words, it doesn't matter whether the reals are constructed via Cauchy sequences or Dedekind cuts. But in some toposes where Countable Choice fails, the two objects Dedekind Reals and Cauchy Reals may become non-isomorphic. In the sheaf topos Sh([0,1]) for instance, the Dedekind reals are (externally) the sheaf formed out of the continuous functions [0,1]->R, and the Cauchy reals are the sheaf formed out of the constant functions [0,1]->R.
Always fun to see the term “super-organism” pop up.

I was super fascinated with super-organisms back in college.

I convinced myself that mankind counts as a super-organism (although I’m sure experts might disagree, with reason). We’re an incredibly specialized bunch, the majority of us are utterly incapable of surviving without the tethers of civilization.

And I was super enamored with the notion that the internet was a central nervous system for this budding Homo sapiens super organism, and wanted to ask interesting questions like “is the super-organism intelligent?” To which the answer was “if we can learn from our mistakes.”

So I’m not so sure we’re an intelligent super-organism.
This question is beautifully explored in a video by the same author of the submitted article:
Organisms Are Not Made Of Atoms - https://youtu.be/vaJcmWjMNwo
Or this

https://fox23maine.com/news/local/usm-students-reach-agreeme...
That’s just it: I believe they must be allowed to present their (manifestly stupid) ideas as facts. The rest of us must also be allowed to present evidence and data to prove their ideas are wrong, but they have to, in moments and mediums they choose, be able to say “yup, the earth is definitely flat.”
The entire point is that popularity is not a relevant factor in this decision.

After all both opinions are or were popular so which one are we supposed to pick among the popular options?
Case by case. Generally, if they commit to no violence then they should be supported, even protected by police. Uncomfortable conversations should be allowed to happen.
Just like the “Smart TV”, I fear your options will eventually be eroded until there is essentially no choice. On the upside, just like smart TVs now, if you buy an old car in the future then perhaps the manufacturer will have let the software rot sufficiently that the servers it reports to won’t be there any more.
> It should be safe to assume that Dockerfile create the same (or really similar) image everytime

Nope. Most of the Dockerfiles I've seen will do wildly-unreproducible things, like running apt/pip/yum/npm/mvn/sbt/etc. without even giving any version numbers (let alone expected hashes)

This seems to be pretty rampant; for example, here's some AWS documentation which encourages such reckless behaviour (even giving the '-y' option to apt-get!): https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonECS/latest/developerguide/...
> LastPass will not survive the pending customer exodus and class action lawsuits.

Literally nothing will happen. Mark my words.

Don't know where you are getting this fantasy of the company not surviving, and class action lawsuits. Every similar example in the last 10-15 years that I remember was the same (people forgot after a week and nothing happened).
> Because the backend actually does something.

Yikes. We can be just as reductionist about the BE: it’s just a shim for accessing a database.
A common mental model seems to be if perceived risk (possibility of harm) is low relative to other risks, take no actions to improve safety (freedom from risk).

My model is if extreme harm is remotely possible, I ignore comparisons to other risks and take action to help limit it to minor harm (e.g. don't text while driving, wear a seat belt, wear a hard hat on a skyscraper building site, etc.).

But "take action to increase safety" creates a combination of challenges for the average person:

(1) Most people don't change easily ("Taking action" means change);

(2) Most people underestimate the likelihood that the near future will be different than the present, that change will be thrust upon them;

(3) Most people don't recognize that they don't change easily, or that they underestimate the likelihood of near-term change.

(4) Very few realize that changing behavior overlaps with a lot of performance-related skills, some of which are poorly understood by virtually everyone.

I have coached ten of thousands of sessions teaching voice acting, and I find that people attempting performance get stuck between stages 1 and 2 in the “Four Stages of Competence”:

(1) Unconscious incompetence (Ignorance)

(2) Conscious incompetence (Knowledge)

(3) Conscious competence (Skill)

(4) Unconscious competence (Awareness)

As https://TaskCompetency.com/ points out, stage 3 is okay for accountants, unworkable for performers.

People think that if they've simply been given information and received coaching, that it somehow magically imbues them with special performance powers, yet they haven't:

(1) Turned information into knowledge.

(2) Applied knowledge to build skill.

(3) Practiced skills to build awareness.

So when people making an effort and paying to achieve change still fail at most steps for implementing change, I think there are a number of blind spots making it very difficult for people to really understand what safety is, because it's hidden behind "life performance" issues. Just my two cents.

You might ask if I am simply a poor coach, and if better coaches get better results—maybe it's not an "other people" problem, but more a problem with my perceptions and approaches.

There is a saying among some in our industry: "Once you get an agent, you lose your talent". (https://AcademyofVoiceover.com) This is due to newly trained talent no longer applying skills they have learned, due to believing that having had their training affirmed by getting an agent makes their performance "automatically high quality".

There is a similar statement commonly found on websites of acting coaches, that goes something like "I'm one of the best coaches of my acting method, and I know this because I get the students of other coaches teaching my method and they haven't learned the method well". Of course statements along the lines of "others are bad, I alone am good" usually overlook many things.

So in my experience, even trainers and producers of performers have a blind spot to some of the challenges in creating change in even people who are motivated to change.
Google already does this, it is called Knowledge Graph[0].

[0] https://support.google.com/knowledgepanel/answer/9787176?hl=...
This could get spice-melangey