skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'd guess that every reader knows that. Unsurprisingly, there is a much more lively debate that laypeople can weigh in on re the validity of the quote, as opposed to discussing the origin, so that's what gets more comments
To be fair, you are a fickle crowd who devour your idols. For what ever you have an apatite you eat and crap out.

One thing we know about genius, they’re socially awkward, sometimes buffoons.

Let us hope our brainiac goes back to space travel and electronic devices.

Stop trying to fix humans Elon, you’re one too.
If they can’t/won’t arrest low level offenders, it makes it easier to construct a ring.

Just like the link you posted.

If it’s too easy to prosecute low level folks, the friction is too high.

Glad they’re going after the rings at least!
Yes. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22788823
No, the argument is about what is moral or immoral. Saying "I'm not going to have an assisted suicide right now" or saying "I will allow you to have an assisted suicide right now" is completely irrelevant to the discussion of the morality of the same.

Your argument certainly doesn't depend on timing, does it? France has had conscriptions whenever it needed them. If it needs them in the future, you can be sure it will have them.
That HTTP request is kind of hideous. All those extra parameters that have nothing to do with what the response will end up being, and which change often. Seems like a great way to toss out all your API-response edge-cache-ability.
What about sth like this https://github.com/zkonduit/ezkl ?
> But the Commission questioned whether any bandwidth limit was needed in its place.

Seems pretty fundamental to their mission to regulate allocations by restricting spillover. Do we have nothing but clowns running the FCC now?
plus one. it's a breeze.
Short letter to my 11-year-old self
I had the exact same thought: How to do this in CSS?

Please follow-up on this thread with any discoveries or learnings, would be interesting and cool to learn how to replicate the nice soft curve for web assets. Depending on how many different semi-reasonable approaches exist, this subject and analysis would also make for a compelling and blog article.

Edit: Thank you Charles - wow you're so quick to have unearthed and replied with squircle resources in the time it took for me to compose the three sentences above.

p.s. CharlesW: thanks for your helpful and informative comments in general, I consistently look forward to reading your comments whenever I see one. Cheers and happy holidays!
In this instance, we can replace "Proper" with "My preferred" and as a result have improved fidelity as there is sufficient information in the article and the URL to adjudicate.
Most of the "good" programmers aren't good at being a "people person" which is what a manager should be, right?

In most business environments the good programmers are generally ones who stay on task, aren't careless, think ahead... they aren't exactly algorithmic masters or writing the cleanest most extendable code. They aren't writing complete shit shows either, they just get things done. Features implemented, bugs fixed.
> It is effectively legal federally

It is not "effectively legal". You cannot do any of these while possessing and/or using marijuana:

* Pass federal employment drug tests

* ̶F̶l̶y̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶ ̶p̶l̶a̶n̶e̶

* Buy a gun

etc.
Someone reported that he just had a typo in the twitter handle, IIRC an extra "r" at the end; FWIW, navigating up one level also has a link to the twitter handle and works just fine: https://twitter.com/nullpt_rs
This is good advice - to clarify, when I said "DIY" I meant "DIY for him" haha. Wix has gotten a few votes here, sounds like that's the way to go. Thank you!
> I'd actually further suspect that the quote rubs many people the wrong way now because of the whole "misinformation" thing where they actually want their "news" source to be a propaganda organ of their political alignment, rather than an actual unbiased reporter of facts

I don't think I agree. In a divided society, it is very easy to find establishment players who will object to a propaganda headline being printed. News framed to suite either a Conservative or Liberal perspective will make the other side angry, regardless of its truth value.

"I made someone angry that I printed this" doesn't really imply, "it's good that I printed it." Making people angry is incredibly easy to do, especially in a polarized society, and optimizing for outrage and the thinking that outrage makes news more "legitimate" is arguably one of the reasons we're in a polarized society.

----

Aside: other commenters have already mentioned, but just quick reminder again that this article is not about whether the quote is true, it's trying to investigate its origins.
All the schools round here in the UK where I live are 'nut-free'.
All of your examples are news by the quotes definition. Plenty of people don't want any of that printed. Much of it comes down to fights over zero-sum pies.

Successful launch of a shuttle? We're wasting money on space and the media is shilling for the industrial/military complex, as usual.

Breakthrough in physics? That discovery is just careerist researchers making shit up to get more grants.

Election results? The result is a complete fraud that steals my victory away from me and printing this only proves media's bias in favor of my opponent.
I wouldn't go that far, but there has been plenty of soul-searching within EA about how to prevent future "scamming to give".
Providing evidence counter to the evidence presented by the regime isn’t commentary - it is the necessary foundation to empower citizens to form opinions based on understanding more than the accepted dogma.

Allowing one’s audience to stew in a one-sided, vacuous environment devoid of the tools of analysis is the goal of regime-controlled media everywhere.
In that sense, a blurry, warped TIFF is a true digital format as well.
The claim isn't that humans can drive as well using the Tesla cameras as they can in person, just that they can. That seems obviously true.

The (not explicitly made) sub-claim is that an AI can make up for the lack of audio, etc. by being smarter than a human and faster than a human, better able to multi-task than a human, and completely non-distractible. That's debatable, but not impossible.
Copyrights, even short ones are rent-seeking. That is the explicit and more or less stated point of the law. They don’t use that word, so your terminology and framing is slightly hyperbolic and negative spin. It’s a bit more common to say copyrights grant a “monopoly” over a work for a period of time, or simply that the work is protected for some time. I really don’t have a problem with calling it rent-seeking, and I think it’s inaccurate to claim that a shorter term makes it not rent-seeking. It’s still rent-seeking, for a shorter time, nothing more and nothing less.

Why do you claim copyrights aren’t “truly” time limited? That’s not factually correct. We’re commenting on the batch of material that enters public domain. Yes the time limit is long, yes it has been extended, but it is not “infinite”. I said it before, but exaggerating isn’t helping you. Your argument could be more compelling if you stuck to facts.

> I simply don’t think it is rent seeking if the duration is short enough.

It’s less time rent-seeking by the creators, and more time rent-seeking by the copiers. The problem that led to copyright laws existing is unscrupulous copiers who seek rent for something they didn’t create. It happened before, and would happen again if copyrights were abolished. It would be even worse today with companies like Google and Amazon, because they have de facto monopolies on the digital distribution channels, and they can steal and promote content made by individuals without giving them any slice of the pie… even more than they already are.

> If the copyright terms are short and limited, creators have no choice but to create new stuff or lose their revenue.

And if they’re longer, then copiers have no choice but to create new stuff or lose their revenue. There’s a symmetry here you keep trying to avoid. Every argument you have so far in favor of shortening copyright has an analogue argument that would favor increasing the term length. The law currently acknowledges this and is trying to balance these two forces. It might well be off balance today in favor of creators, but if you want to get copyrights shortened, it will require demonstrating a better balance point. What won’t work is trying to claim there isn’t one.
I think it's dangerous to presume that the current narrative is clean from delusion and that only the previous discourse was a psychosis.
> At that point just rob me already what’s the point of working anymore while some lazy ass can get by without competition in this world.

> What we need instead is assisted suicide for people who decided they can’t take it anymore in competing in this cruel world.

This is an incredibly cynical and disconnected thing to say. Life isn't a 'grind' or competition where your success is based on how hard you work, it's a cruel system built on exploitation and abuse.

There are plenty of people that work their asses off providing arguably essential services, yet are barely above the poverty line. Walmart is one of the largest employers in the US, raking in over 150B in profit, yet also has some of the most employees relying on social security programs to get by.
Plus, so many foods list what they "may contain" traces of X, but never really quantify how much of a trace. Which actually may be a good thing about intentionally adding sesame, because at least it makes the amount consistent.

I was allergic to peanuts as a kid, way back before it was cool, and didn't know why M&Ms gave me a mild version of the burning sensation and nausea I would get from eating peanuts. Later it turned out, famously, that non-peanut M&M shells contain some "reprocessed" material from the peanut M&M line. (And still do as far as I can tell.)

Nothing else with the "may contain" label has ever given me trouble! But I still get nervous that I'll find out 2 hours into a bike ride that I just fueled up on an extra peanutty "may contain" Clif bar.

Now I'm concerned about sesame. I can eat hamburger buns just fine but I discovered sometime in my 20s that sesame noodles make me sick, and the last time I was at a Korean restaurant my face puffed up just from the air.

So, oddly, one positive of the trend described in the story is that if processed food X lists sesame as an ingredient, and I can nibble on it and then eat the whole thing without getting sick, then I know whether or not I can eat that food, because it's presumably made with a consistent amount of sesame every time. Whereas with a "may contain" label, I'm never really sure if some batch might have lots of sesame and I just tested a non-sesame batch.
Don’t think that’s what vm means there. The m is likely “maliva”, which is tiktok’s overseas (US/europe) CDN.
But even you only express these thoughts here insofar as there are humans who read them directly. Would you do it if there was not a soul to read them? Would the person whom you replied to do it? Would the person who wrote the thread-starter do it?
So… why would you do a bottom tier job for terrible compensation if it’s no longer necessary to survive
A Dazzle of Zebras: 50 Words for Animal Groups
I hazard a guess that, then, they would state the cross-contamination risk in everything.

Laywers, optimization an all that...
I guarantee you that schools were not throwing out peanut butter sandwiches when I was a kid, and many of the schools I went to are doing so now.

I'm sure you can find an article about peanut allergies at any point in recorded history where they had peanuts.
Sounds like my last job
AWS also mirrors docker official images:
https://gallery.ecr.aws/docker

Announcement here (Nov 2021)
https://www.docker.com/blog/news-from-aws-reinvent-docker-of...
People pitching this universal game currency or items have no freaking idea how games are designed or balanced. It’s a ridiculous idea
We're on track to lose all our pollinating insects within a century with a steady 2% decline year over year (conservative estimate). It's true that European honeybees can displace native populations when nectar sources are tight so efforts to plant native plants can help both bee populations. I don't think we should vilify the European honey bee, but rather address the root problems affecting both native and non-native pollinators alike: over use of pesticides, lack of nectar sources, new disease vectors, etc
> More than a thousand poetry books appear in this country each year. More people write poetry in this country—publish it, hear it, and presumably read it—than ever before.

He goes on to quote some numbers that make it seem like poetry books are secretly huge sellers, but implies there is a sort of conspiracy keeping us from acknowledging it. I don't find that likely.

Bookstores are extremely profit motivated, and not averse to changing their priorities to sell what people want to buy. Science fiction, fantasy, and other genres used to be ghettoized in the back of the store: now they are well-stocked and prominent, because they sell comparatively well. Look at the proportion of shelf space given to poetry books, and where they are located in the foot traffic patterns of bookstores, and I'd suggest that's a good index to its real sales volume, new and used copies included.

There are unusual situations where poetry books sell well: I remember when the singer Jewel published one. That moved some copies. But that's not typical of the performance of the rest of the thousand or so volumes published every year, nor of the health of the medium as a whole in terms of economics or impact on culture.

I appreciate that the author is making a spirited defense of something he loves, but I think it's incorrect, and it seems insular and out of touch. It seems to be denying reality. The idea that poetry is actually doing great implies that it doesn't need to change in order to be relevant to its audience, that the only thing missing is that we need to wake up and realize everything is totally fine.
Whereabouts is this? I work with farmers and I may be able to put you onto someone who can help
Ask HN: For those who host their own email, which email client do you prefer?
There's an Ask HN whether people host their own email [0]. I host my own email using Mail-in-a-box [1] for my secondary domain and am planning to move my primary domain there as well. However, I've not found a good email client till now (having been spoilt by Gmail!)

For other email hosters - which is your preferred email client?

I would like something which had configurable keyboard shortcuts and a fairly good UX.

I don't know why, many desktop and mobile email client applications look a bit dated to me!

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34117386

[1]: https://mailinabox.email/
But where are the cars themselves coming from in this scenario? Are these still other people's cars which Lyft/Uber are essentially paying you to put on their platform? I don't think you can afford to pay people that much less than drivers are paid per hour. Is Uber/Lyft taking care of gas/maintenance or is the owner on the hook for that in the middle of whatever else they might be doing? Or does Uber/Lyft own the cars, in which case you've just replaced one big cost (paying drivers) with another big cost (owning a fleet of vehicles)?
45 didn't roll that back he made a deal with the Dems to get some judges passed in exchange for not killing intrastate commerce of Cannabis [1]

https://hightimes.com/news/trump-makes-deal-protect-states-l...
Sorta. I run my own mail server for receiving but I send through google. Helps that I'm using only one email addy on my domain.

I've set up smtp servers for various projects with SPF DKIM etcaetera and they work (even Google accepts them) so it can still be done.

One day I'll do it for my own server ;)
Yes. Early introduction of foods is proven to dramatically reduce allergies, and not just for peanut. Everyone should be doing it and we should have recommendations and guidelines for parents.

There is also a lot of evidence that SLIT and OIT are effective treatments for food allergies and most importantly that they are far more effective and safer when started very early, before 2 or even before 1 if possible. Early SLIT and OIT should be prioritized for research.
FYI, most CAPTCHA and anti-DDoS services (e.g. Cloudflare) do something very similar, sending the user an obfuscated program implemented on top of an obfuscated JS VM, that they effectively have to execute as-is, in a real browser, to get back the correct results the gateway is looking for. This is done to prevent simple scraping scripts (the ScraPy type) from being able to be used to scrape the site. If you want to do scraping, you have to spend the extra overhead of doing it by driving a real browser to do it. (And not even a headless one; they have tricks to detect that, too.)
The most offensive element in the article was general dismissal of espresso as actual coffee rather than the brown sludge that fills most large vats at conference centers and apparently Amazon offices.

Sure, it makes for a good analogy, but by the same token if you ever find yourself in Italy the post-lunch rush is never delayed with long waits because pulling a shot is near-instantaneous.

In fact espresso was the method derived earlier in the century to refuel factory workers quickly, hence had whilst standing, ready to get back to labor.
This is very true. I've been in the same position and eventually I just burned out.

If you think a programmer can become a manager, you can guide them, but can't force them to become your vision of a manager. The reason they can be a good manager is because they know more than you.

This, of course, requires a certain level of humility from the upper management, which they usually don't have.
To be fair most of that stuff is propaganda gold.

Why state media loves tech it's advertising for government.
No object in particular, it's the overarching theme of the post.
What tests are performed to ensure these vaccines do not go directly to the brain? I ask because there are a myriad of medical publications regarding risk of using nasal sprays, some of which have been proven to cause brain damage.
> My dad likes to try random stuff out of nowhere

You are literally doing the same thing by not completely letting a farm manager take over, or selling it...
AFAIK Alias (which the article say is in use at Apple) uses non-rational uniform B-splines (or NURBS). Covered at 1:02:35 in the awesome video you linked.
Someday aliens are going to land their saucers in a field somewhere in New Jersey and everything is going to go just fine, especially when they too admit they haven't figured out how to keep track of time consistently.
If I understand the article correctly, it's about the research that tested whether talking to strangers improves wellbeing.
On the contrary, I can fault em' for trusting google more. Both Google and the US federal government use the "collect everything you reasonably can, since we might need it later" approach. In both cases you have to trust them to handle our data right in perpetuity.
Surprisingly in some jurisdictions it does. At least in cases related to criminal defense in Poland the existence of a attorney-client relationship is protected (obviously if it comes to trial, it's eventually revealed, but it's not subpoenable up to that point).
I legitimately wish HN banned paywalled submissions.
"Free speech" is not the notion of "say whatever you want regardless of if it's helpful"; it's "don't prevent people from saying things that are subjectively unhelpful".

Free speech "pragmatism" is essentially completely meaningless - if the belief isn't extremely hard-line, it rapidly degenerates to something that has zero moral consequence.
We built an open-source project (3.1K stars on GitHub) for data version control
It's the only way to do mailing lists without spending tens of thousands a month (once you're at a certain amount of recipients)
The biggest difference between human vision and cameras is the fovea. Half of our optic nerves are concentrated in the visual area the size of our thumbnail with an outstretched arm. To replicate human vision you have to have a high resolution camera, downsample the image and then grant the AI access to high resolution imagery when requested.
I think we've reduced the headline to something that is not useful. For instance, I don't want advertising to be printed. So, I guess advertising is news?
Also his video editing and story telling is so so good. Take for example this video [0] at 7:00 until the end, it literally gave me chills. Talking with a robot which takes him up to the roof top of a virtual city where the robot talks about that not all people are bad and that you shouldn't ignore the big picture.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgMyFb0JnsE
That is unfortunately not your fault. You see. There is no strategy.

So whenever good people try and come up with ideas about literally any subject. the republicans ie McConnell are ready to strike it down 100% of the time.

It doesn't matter that it has majority support. It doesn't matter if it helps save American lives. It does not matter what the logistics are or how much money is involved. It does not matter if it helps military veterans and minorities.

Every plan. Every thought. Every move. will be without fail. Denied. Denied. Denied.

That is their only play. and it will also be their downfall. much like a DDOS attack on a network. All we have to do is create a network stronger then the ones they have in play and they will cease to exist entirely. aka - voting. and with republicans saying don't vote - don't vote with mail in ballots - don't vote early.

They got absolutely destroyed pushing their own agenda. Its honestly amazing.
I dunno what's going on with the dupechecker, there seems to be more recently than I remember. But maybe there never was one and it was just dang's tireless efforts all along
That is pretty harsh. The only way to resolve problems with Google like this is to know someone on the inside that can help, or to generate enough outrage on social media that some service team someplace takes notice and reaches out to help the guy.

What the poster can do in the future is enable 2FA on his Google accounts as that seems to streamline password recovery. At minimum add a phone and backup codes. Even better add a couple yubikeys (and maybe drop the phone after adding yubikeys because phones are super easy to compromise)

Same goes for GitHub.
Many proofs of theorems in calculus would require topology to understand. You’re suggesting that you cannot be competent in vector calculus without knowing the proofs at a professional. I think I, along with probably everyone, will have to disagree with that.
The sorts of Driving behaviors you mention are not a significant cause of traffic congestion. Traffic congestion is caused by there being too many cars on the road with limited space for cars.

Anything that will increase the amount of cars will quickly dominate inefficient driving behaviors, and self driving cars will massively increase the amount of cars on the road, as it would drive down the cost of driving and enable many many people who currently can’t drive to get onto the road (eg. Disabled, elderly, unlicensed, children).
Self-hosting email for over 20 years, I will say most of what you stated is either greatly exaggerated or grossly factually incorrect.