skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It won't be open-source, sorry.

> Planning to release this as a paid app in January. Not OSS, but I think the value proposition is pretty good and there will be a free trial. Not sure about pricing yet.

> If anyone is interested, drop me an email (see bio) and I'll let you know when this is ready for testing :)
Microsoft has a sizeable investment in OpenAI and is unlikely to allow that. Moreover, language models are relatively well understood now and OpenAI is using (perhaps not exclusively) open datasets. It wouldn't make sense, Apple could just hire AI people to enhance Siri, which is already what they're doing.
They were going to lose their money either way. The funny bit isn't people who were taken advantage of, but that the one taking the advantage actually sees some negative consequences of it.
If you were looking for an issue to subscribe to for the move to file feature, it’s here: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/29988

It’s a TypeScript language server issue
What I wanted was a congressional inquiry—and I got it!
This would be like if Nokia had the Lumia running Windows Phone, meanwhile they're selling Symbian phones and Apple introduces the iPhone. Surely they'd just launch their Lumia, no?

No. Nokia had a (770, 800, 810, N900) smartphone and self-sabotaged it because it didn't want to cannibalize its Symbian business.
In for a Pound: Russia is in it to win it, and will settle for nothing less
Elon Musk ‘orders Twitter to remove suicide prevention feature’
> after reading about what it's actually looking like in practice in Canada - where the results seem horrifying.

I live in a state (W.Australia) with legal assisted death and I have no specific opinion on what is actually happening in Canada (a peer Commonwealth country) .. but I can see that much of what there is to read on the matter is strongly bent toward the worst possible presentation.

Eg: When I read horrified accounts of social workers recommending death to (otherwise) healthy disabled people I too am shocked .. and then I read elsewhere that this is the isolated practice of individuals whose behaviour is being hauled over the coals at tribunal hearings into "this is how not to do this".

It's a charged issue and no system can ever be perfect. The question for Canada is how much effort is going into oversight and keeping things ethical.
Most of WebRTC is arguably about handling the NATs, actually.
I have always been curious on the mindset christians have regarding sick and poor. Can you recommend any books which supports your take?
I feel like this is somewhat misguided

> and so o I've been happily living a workaholics' lifestyle since.

That is one key aspect. I'm not a workaholic and most other people aren't either. I do somewhat enjoy my work, but I work to pay for my live, not the other way around. I make a decent salary and work 35h/week with 36 days of vacation. I do pay a lot of taxes, but I live in a city with pretty good and affordable public transit, I got my university education for free (okay, I admit, I paid a total of 600€ for my bachelors), etc.

In a well governed country, you don't only pay taxes but also receive something in return.

> work for almost 2 decades as an engineer just so you can afford the average one family home - what a joke!

This isn't necessarily a result of high taxes, its also a result of Europe being much denser populated than the US (or Australia), limiting the supply side for construction land. The kind of the construction also plays a role, the average newly built European home is substantially more solidly constructed than the reference in the US.

> hence pushing for ever fewer work hours or even days because what else is there if your salary is essentially capped

Have you ever considered that many people would much rather have more free time than more money? Beyond a certain level, increased income doesn't correlate with increased happiness/wellbeing. Where this level is certainly depends, but it is much lower than many people anticipate.
https://krilex.net/invite/213434063
Apple is adding a GPU upgrade to iPhone?

I really want them to compete with Nvidia release a brand-new, efficient but affordable GPU for mac. So that I can do ML training on mac and not rely on Nvidia and Windows. It would also help people who want to use mac for gaming,
So you don't vote in elections, I take it?

After all, almost no election is ever decided by one vote.

(If it did happen, they'd have a recount because there are probably counting errors.)
First, of course you can understand a theorem without knowing the proof! Uniqueness of prime factorization, for instance, is notoriously tricky to prove, but it would be a stretch to say people who haven't majored in maths haven't learned it in any real sense.

Second, even if you wanted to understand the proof of a theorem, doing it with a proof assistant is an atrocious way to go about it.
I, on the other hand, switched to ChatGPT on 80% of my Google queries. I still use Google for index searches (ie what's that website's domain?) but not for knowledge searches, which is what I do most of the time when "searching". Google cannot maneuver their legacy business fast enough to compete, nor safe enough not to risk cannibalizing their own revenue stream. And Google search is not just one product anyway, but a portmanteau of shopping assistant, live tickers, calculator, condensed Wikipedia, etc. OpenAI, or the next LLM business, really has a shot as a knowledge query disruptor - and then some. It's the most powerful software sidekick I've ever had, and the idea of an AI sidekick market is a card that trumps that of any index search on steroids.

When you go to the library, sometimes you know the book/author, and that's both the librarian and googles domain. But most of the time you want the knowledge, which libraries are terrible at helping you out. Now we got the sage. Once the sage gives not only the wisdom but the way to the wisdom (citations, links, recommendations) then it's whole new ballgame.

Live data from the web, index searches etc. are all add-ons in this new ballgame. "Plugins", like what chatGPT does with tabular data, will be added with time, making the search business completely obsolete.
Google is not ready to disrupt themselves.

Too big to fail problem.

Either they do it or get disrupted.

Plain & simple.

I can easily see 50% of revenue being cut off because of this tech.

Google needs to get it out first or lose the long game
My circa 15 year ago experience as an IBMer had that vibe. Press-release-innovative but operationally a lumbering bureaucracy bending over backwards to cater to their fellow lumbering bureaucracies... And they're still around. Given, they have a lot more inertia than Google.
The Soviets actually pioneered a lot of this stuff in the 1920s and 1930s as part of their planned economy, but of course they didn’t have computers back then. They’d even tried to solve for the minimum-cost diet problem but had to reject it because it ended up some unpalatable combo of flour and vitamin-fortified margarine. Leonid Kantorovich had proposed a solution in 1939, but Dantzig’s simplex algorithm was the first formally proven and practical method. Logistics has always been the US Armed Forces’ forte, and this, along with other Operations Research breakthroughs from RAND Corporation is how the US built its edge.
what is your definition of welfare?
Yeah, this is more where I'm coming from. Even if the product's technology were fully ready to launch, there are so many layers of stakeholders, existing overlapping product lines, branding questions, and, yes, pure politics to overcome. That's all in addition to the classic Christensen innovator's dilemma whether the company even wants to disrupt its own business model.

It's a lot more than removing an ACL on a server.
But that's not what's going to happen. 99% of the time that 10/hours a week is going to be liquidated in the form of 25% less high-paying jobs.
No new drivers, but I did make some changes to the Linux kernel. It's mostly a better tuned VM and services on both sides, e.g. a custom fast networking stack in place of Docker's VPNKit.

(Also, by "fast VirtioFS", I meant the same VirtioFS implementation tested in the article because it's faster than other solutions — sorry if it wasn't clear.)
> On the other hand, the implication that Lisp textbooks -- or other language texts that use fibonacci or like examples for recursion examples -- shouldn't be using simple recursive definitions as an illustration if there exists a closed form may well raise some eyebrows.

I didn't imply that. I think the author laments the lack of math in LISP programming books beyond a couple of cliched examples he gave, well the "simple recursive definitions". He is not saying you shouldn't be using them, he is saying that is not adequate. That's too little. He is saying LISPers should go beyond that. My point was that you can definitely go above and beyond that into the math territory complete with coherent body of theory(a bundle of theorems and their proofs), but that will take you way off course. Especially, given that regular math textbooks contain all the relevant info. I am not even arguing the rest of what you said.
What part do you disagree with?

I am also wondering:

1) how resilient chat-to-search will be SEO spam in the future,
2) whether people will be less likely to publish content if chat is supposed to spit out its summaries and, potentially, reduce traffic to their sites.
Non-JS readable version [1]

[1] - https://archive.ph/6HZH3
Anecdata: I regularly stop at a UK motorway services (Hopwood Park, M42) where there are 16 superchargers (and have been for several years) and even on the busiest days there’s always been a couple free.

Meanwhile over at the “public” “fast” chargers (4 of them) there’s regular contention, to the point of heated verbal disagreements between drivers one busy day this summer.

(I thankfully drive a Prius which can make the entire 250 mile trip on half a tank of petrol.)

Tesla have their own contention problems here and there, but I consider the supercharger network a definite competitive advantage over other EVs.
I guess it depends on a person, doesn't it?
I think you've misunderstood: This IS advocating for no framework. It's a satire of real framework's websites.
Mostly articles like https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2015... (this case is also being prosecuted by SDNY) and a general expectation that she won't go scot free (so not just 21 days) but also that SBF is the one they really want to put away.
One would think that the makers of smartphone chips would be particularly good at and experienced with calculating power draw.
I wonder why anyone would downvote this factual information...
On the other hand, I have a loved one who struggled with suicidal thoughts for years and told me that if they'd lived somewhere like Switzerland where euthanasia is easily accessible, they would almost certainly have used it. Now they're no longer suicidal and are very happy that they're still alive (as am I!)

That's the kind of personal experience that makes me feel much less in favour of legalisation.
I had a N810, Maemo was cool but would've been stomped on by the iPhone. The Lumia was Nokia's first phone with proper modern UX.
Apple does some amazing things with network protocols, but they are a leading force in pushing walled gardens, locked down devices, and such.

Other companies give you less privacy, but more functionality exposed to the user.

Of course, without Apple's walled gardens, google might lock down their stuff too, no longer needing to have a bit of openness to differentiate themselves.
Prestige Bias and Privilege in Academia
QuiteRSS. I stuck with it for years, still works.
Did you miss the M1 / M2 series?
You see? Your viewpoint is already narrow.

You may disagree with Cato but it’s not a “bunch of hacks”.

You sound like a right wing person claiming the ACLU is a “bunch of hacks”.
The M1 Ultra is already "equivalent to a 3090" (lol) so maybe the M2 Ultra will be "equivalent" to a 4090 (lmao).
YACS – Yet Another Configuration System
I had ChatGPT hallucinate an entire iOS API, complete with docs, sdk version, and URL on apple's website. All of it fake news.
Seems kind of assbackwards to start baking in ray tracing to the smallest device. Is there some advantage to this?
https://archive.ph/47C1z

It's commercial pasengers taking extra trips to retain FF perks.

> Their goal: Fly and spend enough to maintain or upgrade their elite status with the carrier they fly most, with the promise of upgrades, free checked bags and bonus miles for the following year.

The title given currently The Frequent Fliers Who Go To Extremes had me wondering if this was to be tales of daring do from those who clock up a million+ line kms in flight on a routine basis.
Do higher teacher salaries correlate to student outcomes? Not to even mention causation.

Private school teachers earn less than public school teachers, but private school students get much better educational outcomes.
I'm really curious as to why Apple has been unable to reproduce their leap in CPUs in the GPU space.

It's not exactly surprising when Nvidia parts handily beat the M1/M2, but when both Qualcomm and Mediatek have better GPU performance _and_ efficiency [0] something is up, especially given just how far ahead Apple has been in mobile CPU

[0] https://twitter.com/Golden_Reviewer/status/16056046174164295...
Yeah how droll sites do this but it's just means you might not simply copy and paste the wrong key text ... which can happen like an unintentional full stop.

https://dev.to/clairecodes/how-to-prevent-pasting-into-input...

The work around is using something like autohotkey, write a script to ask for password (rather than just write a script to input the password direct) and then as far as the site can tell, you will be manually inputting it into form.

Oh a note, the linked form, the first password entry readily accepts a paste.
Do you have ideas for how we can make the citations more likely to be used?

It does seem like the biggest failure cases of chat are happening when we have not yet incorporated one of our apps (like weather or directions).

Richard from YOU here.
Except it’s been reported that it lead to a board meeting and since Sundar has said that Google will pivot in some regard internally because of it. So it doesn’t matter if they beat it or not— it’s existence is a tangible threat.
I heard rumours that the current time of day is a very important input feature for various content recommendation engines (things like those deciding which videos to show on youtube's front page).
Resume over HTTP Response Headers
Your last paragraph is just a list of reasons to ignore the game theory fact that your individual consumer choices won't make a difference either way. You say it is absurd, but there is simply no way of getting around that fact that the purely rational choice would be to shop at the place with the cheapest prices regardless of how you feel about the store you are getting those prices from, at least in terms of getting the best price and having an effect on which stores stay open. Sure, your arguments about meeting interesting people or having good ethics hygiene can be persuasive, but those are simply sidestepping the game theory rather than arguing against it.

I feel similarly, actually, and my gut reaction is revulsion to this fact, too. I hate the idea that my consumer choices actually don't have any affect on what type of business succeeds or fails. I want to believe that my choices matter to the world, but logical analysis clearly shows that it doesn't. We can't deny it, we can only ask, "ok then what do we do?"

My entire point is that we can't rely on the free market to fix these sorts of problems, because the free market relies on incentives, and those incentives won't solve problems like mistreating workers, polluting the environment, and any other externality of that sort. We can't simply hope that spending our dollars ethically will change anything, because it simply can't.

You might think I am immoral for pointing this out, but I feel like it is the opposite. The people who WANT us to believe that 'voting with our wallets' matters are the one's who want us to NOT do anything else. They know that our consumer choices aren't going to effect any real change, but they want us to think it can so that we don't do anything that could ACTUALLY make changes, like organizing politically. They want to promote the narrative that the free market is the way you change the world for the better, when it clearly isn't.

Honestly, this is the same as voting. People in power who want to maintain the status quo love to push the idea that you change the world by simply voting, but it isn't enough just to vote as an individual and hope it works out, for the same reason that an individual making a purchasing decision can't change things.

This is called the Paradox of Voting (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_voting), because no individual vote actually matters.

We can only make change by organizing and coordinating action.
It's why people invented religion
A tale as old as time
Again, they are intentionally not releasing it because of reputation risk and how it disrupts their ads business.

This is a code red.

Not because of tech but because a direct challenge to how a search engine monetizes ads.

They need a new business model.
While Google may indeed have something internally that competes with ChatGPT, I can't use it. I'm sure that lambda and Meena are cool, but where is it?

So what if Deepmind can now conquer grandmaster-level Settlers of Catan or Chutes and Ladders? None of that impressive work is available to me.

For all their technological prowess, Google fails at actually releasing and maintaining useful products.
> Although ChatGPT still has plenty of room for improvement, its release led Google’s management to declare a “code red.” For Google, this was akin to pulling the fire alarm.
I wonder if A16 was backported from N3 to N4 which increased power consumption.
Yes and no. As you said, in some areas we have wonderfully efficient codes that can take advantage of hardware for things like codecs. Efficiency through high level languages - that's debatable. Often they trade developer efficiency for efficiency of the computer - layers of abstractions to hide platform details, runtime layers to defer some things to runtime, etc.

I rarely see people using new tools to develop code that itself is more efficient - based on the ever growing resource needs of programs that rarely have corresponding growth in capabilities, I think almost all of the effort from the developer community as been on making developers feel more efficient at the cost of compute resources.

Personally I'd love to see people focus on efficiency even if it takes more time and effort. Unfortunately, the incentive just isn't there - developers focus on what make it possible for them grind out new code faster to the largest audience possible. Hence the layers upon layers of runtimes and abstractions that make that possible. If it means burning CPU and memory, they really don't seem to care. Hence the relentless consumption of more and more resources by software.

I'm jaded : performance analysis was a long term research area for me, so I pay a bit more attention to these kinds of issues than your average JS or Python jockey who thinks the computer is a magical container full of infinite RAM and compute resources that are theirs and theirs alone to consume.
This seems to ignore how fast ChatGPT popped up as a refinement of drastically worse precursor code. We're talking "give it a year and it'll leave current ChatGPT in the dust" rather than the previously held notion of "give it a decade and it might be a few percent better".

If you don't see the tech underlying ChatGPT as a replacement for google search, ask yourself why, because the only thing currently holding ChatGPT back as the only search engine you need, is information integrity: is what it's claiming actually true. Give it a year, OpenAI isn't sitting back, pretty sure the next publication will -yet again- blow us all away with how much of an improvement they effected.
Wow. Fun fact in Florida We do actually say Orlando is an hour away from Orlando.
What’s up with the asteroid? The article says:

After the failure of Project HARP, Gerald Bull started a new company called the Space Research Corporation and established himself as an international artillery consultant. In 1988, he was hired by President Saddam Hussain to build a massive cannon for Iraq with a range of up to 1,000 km, making Israel and central Iran well within reach of Iraqi artillery fire. Two years later, while returning to his apartment in Brussels, Bull was shot five times in the head by Israeli Mossad agents, halting Project Babylon.
I tried switching to project.el, but eventually decided it's too bare-bones for me.

As far as I'm concerned, project.el lacks the following features OOTB:

1. Something like the .projectile file to mark a folder as a project (without VCS).

2. Support for ag, rg and vterm.

3. Register new project types (to customize configure commands, compile commands, etc.)

4. Regenerate tags.

5. The ability to find the "other file" (x.h <-> x.c) across the project.

And this list is incomplete! So if you rely on any of the above, I suggest not migrating to a project.el-only setup.
Bubble dome sports
So why doesn't the NYAG charge them with the most obvious scam in history according to HN? If it's so clear from outside that Tether is not backed by actual dollars, how come the NYAG which has subpoena power and so one doesn't latch on such an easy and infamous case?
It’s innuendo. You have not built the case.

Where is the proof the Pentagon harmed Americans? Pursuing interests abroad is not illegal.

Where is the proof Twitter was forced to do X, Y, and Z by the government?
I still don't see people talking about copyright issues with chatgpt?

On normal search engines people actually visit your blog, know who wrote it, and you may even get paid if you have ads or get hired because of your blog.

But with ChatGPT there is nothing, no website, no sources, nothing.

People who actually take the time to write useful posts are never rewarded by recognition or money, if chatgpt kills search engines, it will also kill the entire independent internet.

what's the point of writing something if nobody is going to actually see it? Its just going to be read once by an AI and that's it.
That's super cool. I can quickly and easily use natural language to do query. Which AI model is being used?

https://ossinsight.io/analyze/kubernetes/kubernetes?playgrou...
I'm using shell scripts for my small C projects. Works awesome. I dread the time when I'd need to deal with those overcomplicated build systems.
I really love it. A lot of people may be trying to look at all the edge cases and find glitches but it you search it from the point of view of an average search user this is just groundbreaking.

I mean as a regular joe I am trying to find an answer to my main question like say what is Bitcoin and then I have a lot of follow up questions like what is ethereum and today I may stumble on an article that answers my main question but may not have anything on the follow up thoughts in my head, so I have to go back and rinse and repeat and skim through an awful lot of stuff before I get what I want.

But this thing is just amazing, it answered everything I wanted to know originally, followed by all the things I needed clarification about right there including things I find confusing.

I know Google has had competition before like DDG and Bing but they always felt like something I would try to use because it's not the evil Google, not because they were better. But after having used this I can say Google finally has a competitor that I will probably use again because it is actually better.
Really pleased to see Enumerable.product make it!