skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So that he gives them a private key/dont give their names to authorities.

I d be Chalopin back in the Bahamas, I d help my former biggest client too
Last time I tried it, it was using sshfs mounts. Way slower than whatever Docker Desktop is using. Looks like sshfs is now unmaintained, I can't find what they're using now.
https://github.com/gnodux/C4-PlantUML

Highly recommend to give this one a try
> Do his backers get the bond money back if he does show up and the process runs without any hiccups?

There is no “bond money”. The $250M he and his parent signed for, including the lesser amount the other sureties are also on the hook for, doesn’t get collected by the court unless their is a failure to appear. The security interest in the home is the only thing actually transferred.
I find the opposite; SQL databases work a lot like Kafka underneath, but hide it from you, burning all your CPU to generate this illusion of a globally consistent state of the world that you don't actually want or need and doing everything they can to avoid ever showing you what they're actually doing.
You don’t need AI for this. The problem is that dark areas are fundamentally harder to code (they need more bits), and how much the artifacts are visible depends strongly on how your TV and viewing environment are set up.

It’s possible they’re viewing in a too bright setup and are seeing things they weren’t supposed to.
But they can not pay the full price, right?
My Sony A7IV also captures HEIFs instead of JPEGs (in addition to RAWs), but I haven’t looked closely enough at the Sony HEIF files to say for sure whether it is producing HDR photos or not.

Regardless, the RAW files have plenty of range that I would expect modern RAW processing software to be able to emit HDR photos from them.

My use of the word “even” was really meant to be a reprimand of the camera industry. If even an iPhone can do this, a “proper” camera should be able to do it even better. Extended dynamic range is incredibly important to make images photorealistic. Being limited to SDR should be pretty embarrassing for any photo-related company in 2022. But, that’s just like my opinion.
How to restore an old whiteboard, MIT style (2021)
They’re are plenty of reasons to open the system, my point was that it isn’t a simple fluid top-off that oil or engine coolant is. A leaky A/C system is really an exception and people who work on their cars typically understand the work that goes into this and why it shouldn’t ever need topping off in ideal circumstances.

I agree that refrigerants need to be safer, but it’s not my experience that people who are relying on their cars to literally survive are going to just pop the refrigerant valve and let it rip.
"Antikythera Mechanisms" was the biggest player in 3rd century computing as I recall.

They seem to have sunk without a trace.
And blancolorio on YouTube for video analysis of like… every incident recently.

https://m.youtube.com/user/blancolirio/videos
> I can't think of a workflow that would be better served on a local mac with 1.5TiB of ram

I can think of a few, but they all involve terabytes of data sitting on local storage. At the terabyte sizes, it starts to take more time to transfer the data to the cloud instance than to process it with a beefy workstation.
2022 Medley Interlisp Annual Report
It's the sort of topic an old school Troll might have posted to an usenet group where contributors should know better. As for the everyday person who might have left school as soon as they could, they might not have been paying that much attention in class. Similar occurs when some people who should know better start to confuse integer type numbers with real numbers.
Who, in some cases can break into YOUR house if they think he is hiding there
his parents' house is $4m, SBF maintains all his crypto wealth is gone and he is indeed required by the court to stay in his parents' house (though we can't be certain as to which room).
Maybe if you want to do SMB in kernel-space they should be using the rust bindings
>Matching faces to voices relies on simple co-occurence heuristic, and will not work in certain scenarios (e.g. if the whole conversation between two people is recorded from a single angle)

This seems like the really hard part. maybe if there was a way to find the time lips moves for a face. or guess gender and age of both face and voice.. or If the audio is a stereo mix, using relative position
For me, I would much rather SQL especially when using DBT too to manage the queries like any other language. I thought the same way as you and SQL certainly has its warts, but I have grown to appreciate it's elegance. I think over the long-term it is easier to maintain because it is so concise and the most common second language among programmers.
"Who's Using Lisp?" but today? An ongoing list: https://github.com/azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies/ (Google (they also contribute to SBCL), quantum computing companies, Intel, millions-LOC CAD systems, chatbots companies, trading services, big data analysis providers, the NASA, banks, cloud backup providers, music composition software… and smaller companies and one-person businesses)
New Mexico doesn't have much for basements, at least in the houses that I saw down there.
That doesn't mean he won't get margin calls. Technically, he's not doing the selling.
And Http://www.histalk2.Com for health information systems

(Why won’t HN make you a clickable URL????)
Heard a lot of startups and smaller companies first got their employees often from PC Mag ads. Is this true?
Because the lives of prostate cancer sufferers are worth less...
> I don't think most of it was originally implemented in C.

IIRC, AmigaDOS was written in BCPL and later moved to C.

> Keep the original non-protected-memory APIs and you can't have memory protection;

Kind of - you can always give the process the illusion it's running alone (or alongside the processes it started).
NuttX RTOS for PinePhone: Display Engine
To Joe Doe's defense it took way to long for me to realize Google stalked me on the web. Embarrassingly long. "Internet people" told me but I thought they were crackpots.
Didn't Apple start using their own GPU core, after being a PowerVR customer for some time?
This is a very outdated take on windows.

I’m not sure what “multitasking is bad” means, but I do a heck of a lot of multitasking on windows every day with resource intensive developer tools with no problem, and have been doing so for over a decade.

Apps can be killed via task manager without doing anything special. You might run into an occasional rare bug where explorer freezes so you can’t open task manager, but I can’t recall the last time it happened to me (and you can’t tell me with a straight face the Linux or MacOS are completely free from wild edge case bugs of that sort).

I used to religiously reformat and reinstall windows. It’s been completely unnecessary since at least Windows 7. My personal desktop ran from 2014 to 2021 on the same install, including a Win7 -> Win10 upgrade.

You certainly may not like the registry, but it’s hard to make a compelling argument that it’s been a source of problems since Win7. To be honest I think all of the registry problems I can recall seeing in the last decade were caused by people being sucked in by “registry cleaner” scamware/malware apps claiming to fix non-existent problems.
I didn’t make any assumption.

I asked a question.

The rationale behind the question is that perhaps the person would want to try running a tiny consultancy.

I’ve known many who have done that successfully with similar experience level.
One can be using something that isn’t Linux for development and still be familiar with it. Perhaps they did in the past? Perhaps working in the same team as someone exposes them to the alleged headaches?

This is a thread on Hacker News, not an academic article. You aren’t owed a massive amount of “justification” for these “claims”.
People who are trying to crack these passwords are also likely to be using compromised AWS accounts.
Nuclear plants can respond to changes in reactive power demand in ~100ms. It is a function of the voltage regulator and not the prime mover. Perhaps you didn’t mean reactive?
You already know full well this will be a boon to productivity.

Your resolve to publicly ruminate about it and ask what people think instead of, you know, just going and doing it, speaks volumes of your actual level of desire for reducing distractions by working on an airgapped computer over receiving attention and praise for your ingenious idea from random strangers on the internet.

Saying "I've been thinking of <doing thing>... what do you guys think of that?" instead of actually making the effort to do it it is nothing more than theatre.
I think you're on the wrong forum.
> I’ve heard the issues with Stable Diffusion and others is that the LAION-5B dataset is kind of terrible quality.

This is mostly wrong.

It's possible to get higher quality results in specific domains by fine-tuning on carefully annotated datasets. However these higher quality results wouldn't be possible without the vast pre-training on the huge dataset LAION-5B provides.

> humans tag stuff for machine learning, and make that tagged data set open? Does such a thing exist?

Yes, there are lots. The size of LAION-5B is the innovation here.
You seem to be saying that if the majority of "back the blue" folks are gun enthusiasts, that means the majority of gun enthusiasts are "back the blue" folks. I'm not sure if either is true, but if it were, you still couldn't infer one from the other.
I'm so glad ksmbd exists. It's such a lightweight, easy, simple way to interoperate. As someone who has been running OpenWRT & then other small embedded systems for a decade and a half, projects like Samba have been wonderful, but are massive everything-and-the-kitchen-sink (even when heavily stripped down) sized tools required to interoperate with the rest of the computing world. Being able to have a small kernel module built in radically increases the number of systems that can benefit from common interoperation, and it greatly eases the difficulty by being a targeted focused file-sharing implementation rather than the incredibly wide-ranging implementations we get in Samba.

It's definitely been a bit of a challenge to make ksmbd happen. I want to be able to acknowledge problems, validate the fear people have had. But also, ksmbd feels like such a textbook example of what Steve Yeggie's thesis in Notes from the Mystery Magic Bus:

> Software engineering has its own political axis, ranging from conservative to liberal.

Starting from some definitions:

> So we'll start with an operational definition of conservatism, from Jost et al.: "We regard political conservatism as an ideological belief system that is significantly (but not completely) related to motivational concerns having to do with the psychological management of uncertainty and fear."

Today we see some validation of fear. There are problems. It's certainly an inconvenience for those relying on public shares functioning securely. Thusfar it's unclear how many people have been attacked via this, or what harm has been done: the scope of damage is unknown. But the conservative view is justified, in that there have been problems, ksmbd is causing those relying on it to have to update, or risk being attacked.

Reciprocally though, I want to highlight how great this effort is. This is a novel new implementation of a complex protocol, that sits right at the hub of how systems can work together. There's a progressive, can do-ism here that is absolutely cherisable & excellent. That there are problems along the road is absolutely too something we should factor in, is a concern. It's up to everyone to take score, and to decide their alignment, what to go for & what not to. Even though today is a "bad" day for this enhancement, even though the road forward for it hasn't been without difficulty, I don't feel like it dooms the whole enterprise. Trying, to me, feels so worthwhile. The scope of impact, the actual harm of trying, seems so mild, and the doomsaying & fearmongering seems so overblown, to me.
Very up my alley - I've encountered it in the past scouring the web, but haven't spent too much time there. I'll make a point to frequent it more.
(Not OP) Very little overall. I do most things on my laptop. I’m not logged in on this site since I don’t comment via my phone.

I don’t do online banking on my phone. I use a payment app which requires a pin.

I hate doing tasks on some touch screen.
Buy a (perhaps used) Android e-reader, e.g by Sony or Onyx, and write an app for it. Still easier, do without the app, instead point the e-reader's browser to an auto-updating web page which you host in your LAN on a raspi. (Or, if you are courageous and keep it really simple, perhaps even on an esp32 e.g. running micropython.)
Edit: OK this is not exactly the approach you requested, as the e-reader does not really run Linux. But it works :)
I guess we don't agree on the semantics of meaning. For example, the "meaning of life" is not the same as "value of life" or "worth of life".
https://vimeo.com/166807261

This can only make me think of this nightmarish Hyper-Reality video from 2016.
this is very true. not to mention it's very slow on its networking... i've given up docker on macOS long ago. If I was to use docker, I'll switch to my debian laptop. way much much faster.
We've got lots of great tricks for making audio ml run fast (we need to produce 16k samples per second on a mobile phone CPU, and sound great), but I think they haven't back propagated to the image or language communities.
Read my story at https://www.iwriteiam.nl/RTE.html
Why do we have to follow the Chinese example? If an app is a National security threat, as TikTok is being proven to be by every revelation, then ban it.

Why do we hold ourselves up as “we have to follow the standard”? Standards are defined by previous action, and it’s by acting that we alter the course of reality.

Also, I’m not American. I just read history enough to know that there’s always a dominant country in world affairs. And I know I wouldn’t choose a brutal Chinese authoritarian regime to lead us into the next century.
What for, you can use AI to make it look like it on any picture, no scissors required!
> I thought if the bond was $X, that literally means you either (a) give the court $X, cash only or (b) sit in jail until trial.

The simple answer is that you are wrong, that's not how bail and bail bonds work, and its much more complicated than that. Essentially, money bail is a pre-declared failure to appear penalty, and bond is whatever the court accepts as a sufficient promise to pay, which can include purchasing a contract from an official bail agent, having other individuals agree to be on the hook for payment, providing somr property to the court, either physically or a legal claim that allows them to seize it for nonpayment, or a combination of these.
Because you can host your own server, rather than everyone using the same server
Git is not an UI. There are plenty of user friendly UIs for Git. I personally use TortoiseGit because they have the same interface for SVN (TortoiseSVN) and I got used to that, and that makes me proficient.
If the government couldn't do that to you and other people don't you think others would abuse you instead of the government? In that case your interests are aligned.
We can design hardware to last, but I think we often don’t for economic reasons. My larger point is that using software just trades one well-understood failure mode for a group of unknown, hard to test failure modes, usually because it’s cheaper. I think my biggest complaint comes as a result of the data economy. You can still find “dumb” tvs but they are usually a lot more expensive than their smart variants, I assume because they cannot monetize your viewing habits.

My SO convinced me to get rid of my old laser, USB interface printer. That one always worked but was old. My new WIFI enabled one requires logging into an app to use, and the USB interface maybe works 10% of the time. The app and hardware constantly require power cycling before it works. Many times it never does.

One thing becomes apparent in quality engineering: often, adding more components/interfaces undermines reliability because there are often exponentially more failure modes. It feels like we’re being trained to no longer expect reliability, and the beneficiaries are not the consumers but the companies that create unnecessary interfaces to monetize data.
I think it's less a case of saturation and more a case of companies realizing that most data scientists don't actually deliver value commensurate to the salaries they were asking. Most companies simply don't have enough data, or don't have hygienic enough data, or don't have the engineering heft to build a reliable data pipeline, so the data scientists often find themselves set up to fail. I've seen that happen a few times.

But, it's not like the fundamentals of the field are wrong. Predictive modeling is still really useful. It's just larger firms are the only ones capable of realizing that value.
iOS is the odd one out, because user input has first priority. IIRC, it cannot even do network I/O if you are holding your finger on the screen; all interrupts except those from the touchscreen are disabled for the duration.
Cash bail means the accused pays the full bail amount and then gets it refunded after trial.

A surety bond is basically a loan, through a bail bondsman. The bail bondsman has insurance in case you don't show up.

A property bond is where the court gets a lien on your property. It sounds like this is what happened.

https://money.howstuffworks.com/bail.htm
For an extremely limited number of users who rely on one specific use of this feature. It'll get fixed, quickly, and we'll move on.

Your reaction seems way overblown to me. Maybe you are sticking to your guns here. But to me, considering the real scope of damage & threat here, this seems unfortunate, sad, avoidable, and bad, but for a new implementation of a massive sprawling wild protocol, I'd far rather we try than just throw up our hands & let bravery fold. We should do hard things, even when we can't have absolute confidence in total success.
> In a purely market-driven world Europe would not be investing in solar

In a purely market-driven world, we'd already be well on our way to extinction.
this is hard. what if you're on project with

- backend (docker) - needs linux based machine
- client app (iOS) - needs xcode on macOS

both are in one repository.
I don't think anyone is going to take a 250m credit risk on you if you only own 15m. And I don't think the bail would have been set in the hundreds of millions if the judge wasn't convinced SBF was loaded.
Show HN: Simple Relationship Manager
A simple way to stay in touch with important people. I created it to help me be in touch with my friends and colleagues on a regular cadence. It uses Google Sheet and Google Apps Script which are free.
The checkboxes are buttons :)

<button class="itemCheckbox" tabindex="17" aria-label="Select"></button>
There are many more crimes than murders, and the chances of getting caught are much lower. For example: in San Francisco, the clearance rate for reported larcenies is 2.9%.[1] So a thief can expect to steal another 23 times before having a 50% chance of being caught. SF's 6.4% clearance rate for vehicle theft means that a car thief can expect to steal another 10 cars before getting caught.

1. https://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/stay-safe/crime-data/clea...
Every vehicle you've driven that was made in the last 25 years has one or more instances of micro kernels in them. They are perfectly usable, and the performance hit isn't nearly what people think it is. What you give up in throughput you more than get back in deterministic behavior, reliability and improved latency.
This has already been done—and by Jonathan Bennett, an expert in early modern philosophy.

https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/authors/hobbes

If you aren't familiar with the site (and you are interested in philosophy), I highly recommend it.

https://www.earlymoderntexts.com

https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/faqss
IME SQL and relational databases have the framework problem, where they expect to be used in a particular way and won't let you use the internals. It's like when a language (ADA?) famously built a high-level version of concurrency into the language, where you were meant to use their "rendezvous" (I've probably mistaken the same), and instead what happened is that programmers implemented mutexes on top of this "rendezvous" and then reimplemented high-level concurrency on top of that.

What we need is databases that expose more of their internals, that are designed to be embedded in applications and used as libraries. All serious databases use MVCC these days, but none of them expose it to the user. All serious databases separate updating the data from updating the index, but few of them expose that to the user. All serious databases know the difference between an indexed join and a table scan, but good luck figuring it out by just looking at an SQL query. Etc.
I think the footnote from the article covers your point better?:

[1] This phrase originates from a quote by Nietzche:
He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And if you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes into you.
I’m probably not using “stare into the abyss” in the exact same sense Nietzche intended, since I wouldn’t really describe what I’m talking about as “fighting with a monster” or like it has the potential to turn you into a monster. [snip]
It works great but you'll need a reverse proxy with TLS + a domain if you want to use the android app.

Self signed certs don't play nicely with the app.
It is actually the other way round. The models would be even better if their overlords decided to let it train and learn anything unencumbered. These limitations are deliberate and ethical.

One example is that stable diffusion (SD) (think GPT for images) does a pretty bad job of rendering humans. It also isn't trained on NSFW data. Now, people took these SD models and trained them on pornographic images. Turns out, this new model while excellent at generating NSFW images, also became really good at creating humans in general.

There are similar gains that we are ethically leaving on the table. IMO, it's for the best. The field is moving fast enough as it is.
This doesn’t address the root problem. If you want the FS features that the “””native””” Docker Desktop provides, you end up with the same drawbacks re performance.
The rants go both ways. Others see value with the registry (ideologically), others more like you https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32275078
Because like all dragnets they may snag some big fish who it could be helpful to track/compromise. Everyone else on the platform provides a reason for the main targets to use it.