skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Part of it is that Tesla lies about the safety of these things. We still haven’t gotten to the bottom of the switching off the FSD right before a crash scam.

Another part is that their legal team will aggressively attack anyone online suggesting their cars are anything but perfect.
Most adult mammals are lactose intolerant. It's not an allergy.
I didn't say they don't measure anything. Just that they don't measure everything...
Yeah. All of our proprietary images are on GHCR, so we also rehost the public ones on it as well. We have GitHub Actions that repull and republish, whether on cron or on trigger.
No https for wolframalpha?
I think the general idea is people carrying genes that would kill them early on in their life wouldn't get a chance to pass those genes, effectively eradicating them. So it follows that the average lifespan would increase.

Richard Dawkins talks briefly about this in his Selfish Gene book
Funny I have the complete opposite viewpoint. Because we have trained people to not discuss politics when the discussions inevitably arise they are much more contentious and less civil.
"they knew their limitations"

That's the key here. And it's really a coin toss whether previous programming experience makes a manager more aware of limitations or completely oblivious. Perhaps most likely both at once, acutely aware of being disconnected from the state of the art (or even from the state of the art within the org, even if that's also far behind) yet completely underestimating the actual amount.
This makes no sense. I can understand adding sesame to the label, but not actually adding more sesame to the products.

I think this reporter is confused.
> smaller manufacturers who have zero attachment to ARM and would much rather build hardware on their own terms

Or they believe that designing their own cores would be cost prohibitive and prefer licensing them from ARM.

It's also not obvious to me than licensing conditions for RISC-V could be more favorable than what ARM is offering. Why would you anyone even license competitive cores their competitors if they can make more money selling them themselves?
It is, and the iOS 14 changes fixed and highlighted the issue.

Perhaps naively, but I give all the apps (even Tiktok) benefit of the doubt here. It was a fairly common practice for podcast apps (for example), to check the clipboard for an RSS feed and prompt to subscribe to it when adding a podcast. iOS 14 gave new APIs to do that in a more privacy preserving way.

I don't think anyone was busted for anything nefarious, but it just reavealed a lack of suitable APIs on the platform.
Not in law
FALCONN doesn't look maintained, unfortunately
Whilst it might not be of help to OP, I suggest everyone else to do a data export for all your important services every once in a while and save it with your other backups.

https://takeout.google.com

https://account.microsoft.com/privacy/download-data
> to delete the contents and deactivate the account

Are you in the EU? Google's DPO or your country's data protection authority might want to hear about it.
> But honestly, if any term reaches the point where "Everything is X," then X is a useless term.

#2 goes directly to economics. #3 goes directly to the One Child Policy in China (one of the worlds most intense political policies!) and the intellectual underpinnings of eugenics.

#4 is a firestorm topic in the US that links directly to a current culture war, #5 goes to a major issue in the medical system which is how people die. If I bought up #7 in my family the conversation would veer into veganism as a political statement and probably get ugly because we have a practising vegan at the table.

#1, the Guinness World Records might be safe. Might. Maybe. #6 isn't directly political but I can guarantee that the term "human progress" is a risk of bringing up some very stiff argumentation if people are in a mood to quarrel. What we call "progress" is hardly at a consensus.

For someone who argues from principles, this list is extremely politically charged and is going to obliquely hit a bunch of hot-button topics. It goes to principles that are perennial features of politics at all levels of society.

If the goal is to avoid a big argument that'll need to be negotiated directly. If someone is going to argue, these topics are likely hit-and-miss for being likely to quiet people down. I would not bring up a lot of them when talking to my family, that is for sure.
That we are ruled by wealthy incompetent authoritarians is not a novel idea; "The Emperor's New Clothes" is quite a well established folk tale.
The key is that writing the best code might not be what a project requires. Frankly it might be quite down the list. Delivering a great product is so much more than writing great code.

As mentioned in another comment here[1], some programmers don't care about the users, or deadlines. That's fine if programming is your hobby. It's not fine if you're paid to deliver a product.

As an example, if our program doesn't do the right thing on the 1st of January 2023 when regulations change, it is completely useless for all of our users. A programmer who doesn't care about that deadline and the potential effects for the users if it's missed is worthless for us, regardless of skill.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34116132
Lamina1: Neal Stephenson’s Anti-Commercial Metaverse
Well that notion of honesty is subjective and meaningless.
That’s a risk. I pay for my account to try and mitigate this risk so I’m the actual customer, not advertisers.

Google workspaces has a support assisted recovery option. I host dns separately from google as their admin level recovery may require some dns signaling.

Other steps include a yubikey etc . I’ve actually had the experience of losing all my Authenticator codes on an iPhone upgrade which at the time was how I did 2fa - so had to go through recovery for many providers. My top takeaway - if I was paying for service it was possible if sometimes a bit time consuming. If I wasn’t it was hit or miss.

Other tip? Google Authenticator may not backup to iCloud!! I had 20 codes in it including some really hard to fix ones.
I forget the name, but some old paintings contain a visual equivalent of Rot-13, in that there are bits which look like odd blobs when viewed normally, but resolve to an image when viewed at the right angle or with a properly shaped mirror.

Anyone remember the proper term for this, or which century it was popular?
This AI is obviously an engineer.
Right, security advice is always given as though everyone will follow it and it has to work for really useless dummies that don't understand anything about it.

They also say not to roll your own encryption, but if you encrypt your data and then use ssl it does increase security. When there is some bug meaning your ssh key was easily guessable (happened with dsa keys) having that obfuscation will prevent bulk collection from doing things like keyword matching against your data. Doesn't work if everyone does it, but it does work.

Most of the time you gain the most not from state-level impossible to break security, because most of the time you aren't trying to defeat a room full of geniuses all working full time with you as a target.
> This technology can be used for such a wide range of applications that it seems dangerous that it should be moderated on this end, as opposed to where the results are potentially published.

Well, in the instance of the publically available interface to ChatGPT I think it is precisely this restricted because it is public (to be robust under a, to put it nicely, highly diverse usership). All of this is a WIP and OpenAI is gathering insight into how a model this large behaves and can be controlled in the first place. To this end they're exercising the principle of precaution.

More generally I think there has to be a match between a social unit's (states, companies, individuals, etc) design and ability to self-regulate and the power of the technology it has access to (more power, more responsibility) or you will see undesirable outcomes. Give a kid a gun, North Korea with nukes... In contrast the OpenAI people seem like fine folks. After all they do intend their work to be more widely applied, just carefully.

Therefore I think democratisation of this technology should come in a controlled manner by working with stakeholders dedicated to the public good (e.g. social and medical institutions) first and not via the "anarchy" road (just put it out there, undesired consequences) as in the second case we would likely see ungodly amounts of information pollution on the internet (and self-coupling effects from AI training on and copying each other) and in second-order a further "epistemic scattering" (by which I mean a proliferation of belief systems that disagree in fundamentals like the laws of nature).

Your second example seems a bit whimsical but the first might have real impact. In Germany access to (and display of) Nazi propaganda material in historical collections is restricted (may be presented only in an educational context) because the state doesn't want right-wing groups to go wild in reusing it (among other reasons). Now imagine convincing hate speech being generated on the fly.

Once the genie is out of the bottle you can never put it back in...
“Birthright” is this concept that can easily be accepted without question as cosmically inherent. But when you examine it, it doesn’t really make any sense at all. It’s a great way to perpetuate inequality, especially wholly unearned inequality.
IME (I'm not the person you replied to) a good manager does a few things:

- understands the business requirements for the project(s) you're working on;

- helps coordinate the non-technical parts of projects, e.g. facilitator, finding overlaps, and (when they occasionally arise) dispute resolution;

- works on road blocks to getting your job done.

None of those require in-depth technical knowledge.

A good manager may have opinions about the minutiae of what you're doing, but keeps those opinions to herself. After all, the manager's purpose is to leverage their reporting ICs into getting more done, not doing the task herself.
You forgot "Ask HN:" in the title.
Tough time building components of a site using vanilla CSS. What to do?
By now, I'm done with basics html,css,bootstrap coding. I can build navbar, build a hero section with image and h1 text and a footer. That's all.
There are various components in a website though. I'd like to be able to build any of them whenever required if I'm in a job.
I wanted to build a timeline using html and css but it's not entering my head at all. I've seen codes from multiple websites.
https://imgur.com/a/L7c1Bkj

This is the timeline that I want to build. Looks pretty simple but I'm unable to build it. How do I deal with stuffs like this? How do I learn these stuffs?
Is there a course that helps to deal with these stuffs? There's no point of having learn CSS if I can't build these stuffs with my visualization. Please guide me.
The scary thing here is that if I can't build these stuffs then there is 0 point of me learning css. And I'm not going to get any full stack or frontend jobs like that way.
Managers can still program, it's just not the hard/rewarding/critical-path stuff. Knock yourself out with the shitwork like documentation updates and quality of life improvements like build & release streamlining.

>> If you're a full time manager doing a good job, that's not a thing unless you are giving up nights and weekends to do it.

I don't agree with this at all, for a manager or any job.
Show HN: Investables: Physical Asset Investment Platform”
Is it the learning process, or the subject itself?

Programming works with manmade abstractions, carefully designed to have very few interactions, keep mutable state contained, and to have all the parts structured in a hierarchy without recursion.

In math you have systems of equations that all reference each other. And they all happen at the same time because there's no steps and time or lines of code just 5 equations that all interact.

The atomic pieces are much larger and tied together and it inherently seems to require being able to fit nontrivial ideas in your head.

Programming lets you design a complex architecture one tiny piece at a time without considering other pieces.
People are easy to predict so long as you get to do it in retrospect.
> However, such statements are voluntary

That made me wonder, and I looked it up: The situation is exactly the same in Germany, and presumably the EU.

Does anyone know why a) this is not legally required when there's a reasonable chance of contamination and b) why laws are not written in such a way, that "contains traces" is enough if you aren't sure about cross contamination like in TFA's case.

Naively, that seems like it would improve things for everyone?
The difference is access to testing. Most of the people in the US who "test" positive for an allergen aren't actually allergic to it, but that is often not explained properly.

Simply, allergists have three types of testing: skin test, blood test, actual exposure. If you can eat something without a reaction, it doesn't matter what the skin and blood tests showed (they can be "positive" for other reasons). Skin and blood tests are mostly used to determine severity of an allergy after exposure has already proven to be a problem.

But allergy testing is covered by insurance (and it's VERY profitable), so a ton of allergists will do skin and blood tests on people who don't need it, and now there are independent scam companies doing "allergy" testing by mail for curious people.
Are you saying it’s unfair to inherit something?
Get an OpenAI API key. Then `npm i -g askleo` and set env var
OPENAI_API_KEY

`> askleo how large is the average dog`

`> runleo list files in reverse date order`
My gf asked the same question...so there you have it
If you're learning math for career reasons rather than just pure curiosity, engineering is the main/possibly only place you'd use it besides statistical analysis.
At least on Windows 10 for the last few years, the JS is not executed in your browser. There is specifically an isolated, limited environment called pacjsworker.exe that executes PAC files and does not support nearly the same amount of JS needed by a brower. Check this out for a list of the functions in a PAC file: http://findproxyforurl.com/pac-functions/

WinHTTP then uses this to determine if the traffic should be routed through a proxy or not.

It is not, or at least is not now, jscript.dll as the article mentions.
Poetry is not accompanied by music. Rap and hip hop are vital, popular art forms but they’re not poetry.
What boundaries do you set for yourself?
Why can’t you now? I did the whole management thing for a few years and have gone “back” to being a really strong IC. This frees my time to work on architecture, solving difficult problems on the projects, and coding.

I do not even really see it as going “back”, just moving forward in a different direction.

My managers seem to love this so far because they can focus more on the people aspect you describe, while also having someone on the team who can step into many aspects when they want to go for vacation.
When I read the title I immediately thought that this must be in the sphere of @zzznah.
> The difference between them is who treats me with trust and who doesn't, the technical/non-technical divide doesn't matter.

When something technical goes badly wrong, and there are two competing stories on who to blame, how do they decide?
This did not happen on Android, show me 2 or 3 example of a must have app that an USA citizen has to side load? There is not otherwise I assure the Apple PR army would have jumped on that occasion.

Also as I said the USA is not in EU, so Meta/Facebook will still have no choice then put a iOS app of WhatsApp in the Store.

I am 100% sure that this is FUD, reality shows that there is no must use app that a developer refuses to put on the Google Play store because they are evil, the apps are either not allowed in the store because ToS or the apps are small side projects.
Show HN: Stop ChatGPT misinformation with the power of Community
chatGPT is all powerful but with 1 caveat

It can hallucinate or display misinformation.

There is a solution:

Have your chatGPT information verified by others!

Also,

Looking for a good prompt to get the best answer out of chatGPT? Find it here as well!

Join now before it explodes!
If an AI faced someone or something who could disconnect it, we would have a true intelligence, I think that only intelligence of natural origin could reach here.
You can turn the temperature down on the OpenAI API and it is much more accurate. They also have a code-specific model which I don't think ChatGPT is using.
Is "Eyes Wide Shut" a Christmas movie?
In ~2014 when I didn't have a phone yet (being a child) they deleted my account on account of not having a phone number associated for some weeks.

Even though postfix brings me headaches sometimes, seeing issues people have with google seems as setting it up was a step in the right direction.
If you're in Cambridge Mass or Boston, get take-out from Mary Chung's, because they're closing on December 31! ;(
It’s not like Google customer service is going to help on a non-holiday
It's a lot but green beans only retail in the US for max $8lb a pound. Roasting is another world entirely.
Hope you get your account back.

I’ve been on the fence about migrating off Gmail, but after reading threads like this, I put a contingency plan in place. Backups of my Google account are done hourly, and I have a custom domain/workspace account so I can move the domain elsewhere if needed.
No.
The article is very clear why: if the products don't contain sesame, they are required to prevent cross contamination, which they can't do.

They can't simply label them as "may contain sesame", as it doesn't absolve them of needing to prevent cross contamination.

Their only reasonable choice is to just add sesame.
Apparently not many. What's beyond me is why people don't leave the shitty ones. HN comments are full of examples where I'd scream that question. But maybe it's not as bad and people like to exaggerate? Or they prefer to complain instead of taking consequences. I suppose seeing oneself as the victim is just the easy way out.
Trolley Problem? It certainly leads on to politics however.
Well they also don’t think this is what the job actually is, so they pursue it incorrectly and then, shocker, become very bad managers.
> Gmail is still, by far, the best email app.

I used to think so when I used Gmail.

But switching to Fastmail, I no longer agree that it is "by far" the best. Now I think Gmail is only better by a slight margin, and this margin is so small that it does not justify the drawbacks: Potentially getting locked out with no recourse, certainly getting everything you receive scanned to deliver you the best possible ads, contribute to the email monopoly where the big players decide the protocols.
Thanks
Feel free to post your screenshots and ask for features in the Discussions:
https://github.com/cyring/CoreFreq/discussions
A big plus one to Fastmail (no economic link, just happy customer). I use the apple apps to access. I've never actually had any problem but I have confidence if I ever do, it will be solved quickly and painlessly by a human who cares because I'm a paying customer.

I don't know why we ever thought free email was a good idea. Of course Google doesn't care about a free email user. They're just another useless eater out of billions. And yet so many of us (me included, until switching) basically built our whole online existences around gmail.

Email is important. Important things are worth paying for. You have status and recourse if anything goes wrong. Gmail works until it suddenly doesn't and you are reduced to desperate moves like begging for relief on HN. Move away before that happens, and vote with your wallet for fair service for a fair price.
Using an issue reported (in a Linux compatibility layer, even!) with few to little root cause analysis as evidence a 'networking stack is bonkers' is a bit exaggerated - IPv6 in itself is also a bit wacky, and I've had similar issues exist in a variety of environments.

As an opposite example, here's a Wine bug report of a Windows application failing to work in some network environments, but only if it in any way touches the Linux networking stack (such as using VirtualBox's soft NAT, or if running under Wine): https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53346

I guess, in general, software (and networking) is 'bonkers'.
It also runs really well on old netbooks - it's revitalised my Asus EEE 701 4G (even though the screen resolution is below the official minimum requirement), it fits comfortably on the internal 4Gb SSD, and even the wifi works!
> They're a founding member with (I believe still) a significant stake

No, ARM is 100% owned by SoftBank. Apple sold their shares a while ago.

Overall ARM doesen't really make that much money, especially compared to some of their clients. It's not even obvious to me if would make sense financially even for Qualcomm to design their own RISC-V cores compared to licensing from ARM.

I mean they could and did design their own cores but they are still using ARM designed ones for their top-end chips.
No - there isn't really an O(1) solution. And the reason is that the Fibonacci numbers grow without limit. So there can't be an O(1) algorithm - even just writing down the answer takes O(N) - because the answer has O(N) bits.

Concretely Fibonacci(1480) is the largest Fibonacci number that fits into a double. So for higher Fibonacci numbers you need to compute this with arbitrary size integers (or floats). And then look at it in terms of bit complexity (i.e. the time to compute a product grows with the size of the integers).

Put differently. The "constant time" algorithm only works for N up to 1480. And if you limit N, then it doesn't really make sense to talk about the asymptotic complexity.

I believe the optimal algorithm is to compute the Fibonacci number by computing the N-th power of the matrix [[1,1],[1,0]], and compute the power using the repeated squaring algorithm. There are alternative formulations of that using identities for Fibonacci or Lucas numbers, but those identities basically correspond to squaring the matrix.

If you really want the asymptotically fastest algorithm you must use the fastest algorithm for integer multiplication (Harvey and van der Hoeven’s).

But even with the naive multiplication for arbitrary size integers you can compute Fibonacci(1000000) - which is a number with more than 200'000 digits - in less than a second. ;-)
I've never been accused of being an artist before, but I'll take it as a compliment.
I just want a reasonable way to show scroll bars without completely shifting the layout.

Is there a way to reserve the scroll bar space but only show it on auto?
It seems disingenuous to fade from one color to the next while displaying only two hexes for color. Either that or it’s not fading and my eyes are deceiving me, but as I’m on mobile I’ve not the time to look at the source code.
A* is already intermediate level programming. CS is math because it's what we call the parts of programming that are math.

But so much of programming isn't. It doesn't require deep understanding, static analysers are advanced level things that are way beyond what many working programmers ever encounter.

I can't say I've ever seen "Real math" myself.
How will you handle for, or notice, intermittent power issues due to stretched power cords that are no longer intact internally? </sarcasm, but not really>
Thankfully there are much more interesting and positive ways to get over the fear of death than drugs: philosophy (existentialism etc.), humanistic psychology, religion (this one didn't work for me, but it seems to work for many people), literature.
How is it everything? You get locked out of your account.
Hans Holbein’s “The Ambassadors” [1] is the one that immediately comes to mind. It has memento mori which is heavily skewed.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ambassadors_(Holbein)