skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Free speech at a university is important. Sure it opens the door to regressive ideas, but it also opens the door to progressive ideas, which may be equally counter-establishment. A university is a place where these all ideas can, and should, be discussed and debated.

Free speech in a bar, or any other business environment, though is out of place. Because the primary goal of a business is to make money, and creating disharmony and antagonism seldome leads to better business.

In other words free speech is useful, but there's a time and a place.

Bars for example like to attack a hermogenous crowd. Happy people drink more, break less. If 10% of the patrons start spouting off racism, or mysogeny, or whatever, then the rest won't fight it, they'll just leave. If it happens a couple more times they'll stop coming back.

So bars are typically quick to remove people, or ban people, with a history of strife. You don't have to go as far as Nazis, all you need is a few guys being obnoxious about, say, eating meat.

Free speech is not "saying whatever I want, wherever I want, to whomever I want." there's a time and a place. A university campus is a great place, and also (for typical college age people) a good time.
If 99% of people don't know what Linux is, and don't use Linux mode, should it really count? Most people just use what is essentially a browser that can also run Android apps.
"I'm all for free speech except for opinions that I find abhorrent."

That's called "not actually being for free speech".
Never-plugged PHEV is not good, of course. Vehicle itself isn't bad. It must be sold for who live where pluggable.
Muscle protein synthesis only kicks in after you’ve eaten 20g of protein. After working out, you ideally want to do this 4-5x per day, but it’s really hard to get that much protein with a western diet early in the day, especially if you don’t eat meat. Breakfasts are typically lighter than 20g. More than 20 per few hour chunk has diminishing returns. I’m not an expert but reading and listening to podcasts helped me realize that just eating healthy was extremely far from optimal for me.
Indeed and it gave several other actual citation with seemingly correct summaries.

And it's definitely less prone to obvious bs than just a few weeks ago. For a lot of general things, it gives a summary paragraph that's seems a distillation of standard information - the main problems seem to appear when these "scripts" lack consistency.

Edit: Once it "learns" to get citations right, you'll have to dig into those to see if it's right. It's easy to see that arms not looking good.
How would you develop a web app that needs to work offline?
I assume it would be obvious, but perhaps I'm mistaken.

Free speech in the USA is (supposed) to mean the freedom to do political speech without state ramifications (I'm not sure how well this constitutionally works for private companies). This obviously doesn't count credible threats, telling people to riot or be violent, etc.

Basically you have a right to offend people short of targeted harassment.

*This is obviously an oversimplification but I'm giving the HN the benefit of the doubt here, however misguided that may be.
Drinking a lot of water or green tea (1.5l day) will help keep you satiated to some extent, and as a side benefit prevents some types of recurring kidney stones. I doubt it has any direct weightloss impact although I wonder how the body can maintain isotonic state without energy cost driving osmotic pressure differentials. It must be a small energy cost, compared to e.g. cognition which is huge. So, think, while you drink (water)

Green Tea has flavenoids. They sound yummy.

I also treat myself to two squares of expensive chocolate a night. Eat slowly. Really slowly. Let the chocolate goodness roll around and coat your mouth like a kid in a Roald Dahl book. If it helps, think about Gene fighting Johnny for who did Wonka better. In a tank of chocolate.

Over fifty, more protein and less carbs. Potato and pasta are a "sometimes" treat.

Life's too short to eat bad food. If budget forces it, eat the best bad food you can: MFK Fisher's "keep the Wolf from your door" would be good guidance. Jack Monroe in the guardian.co.uk brought Fisher up to date.

My budget doesn't force it, so I eat top quality cuts, but small portions.

Good olive oil is a delight but so is wagyu fat. Have both.

Calcium in tinned fish. And cheese. Anchovies and Sardines and Mackerel are full of umami. And parmesan. (Full of Umami. Not fish. Fish milk cheese? Yuk.)

Nuts have zinc. Too easy to have a lot. Mushrooms left in sunshine grow a bit of vitamin D. Bananas have inulin which is resistant starch which feeds the lower bowel. As does vinegar and fermented veg like kimchi and kraut. Both make meat taste yummy so forget the hippy bucha drink and have a bratwurst or grilled Korean style with pickle.

Cold roast potato and cold pasta is resistant starch too. Some leftovers are good for you!

You can safely eat more eggs a day than you can stand.

Read up on homeostasis and cholesterol before buying into good and bad fat theories.
>If you view some speech as a problem then you're just not for free speech.

I strongly disagree. Support for freedom of speech means being anti-censorship. It's perfectly coherent to believe that particular speech does harm, and also should not be censored.

Suppose you and I are top medical researchers, and we disagree about the best way to treat a disease. It's perfectly coherent for me to believe that your speech is killing people by promoting a treatment which is suboptimal/counterproductive, and also believe that your speech should not be censored.
This isn't much of a secret, but this has helped me immensely.

I am a egg-etarian and have a reasonably healthy diet (no sodas, simple carbs etc). But I wasn't feeling sleek and light on my feet. The following changes did it for me ... I lost 6 kg in three months and my knees thank me every day.

1. Two cooked meals a day. Late breakfast (9:30-10), early dinner (6:00). If I call it "intermittent fasting", I feel hungry, so I stick to calling it "two meals a day". :) Avoid simple carbs and sugars, focus on being properly sated.

2. Satiety is important, and I find that an increase in protein has helped me resist the lure of carbs/snacks. I have eggs, tofu scramble (with tomatoes, onions, scallions etc) and sprouts of all kinds in industrial quantities.

3. If hungry in the afternoon, a whey/banana/nuts/berries/flax seeds smoothie.

4. I chop and blanch and freeze spinach and liberally add it to cooked meals or as a side. The satiety to effort ratio must be high, so I don't care to make salads any more. They are just too much work and I feel hungry shortly after the last mouthful.

5. Shortly after every meal, move a bit for about 10 min, say, or climb 5 floors of stairs.
For me this is it. Just skip breakfast.
* Don't let American portion sizes mess with your perception of appropriate amounts to eat for meal.

* When in a restaurant, don't eat an appetizer and an entree. It's way too much.

* Eat two or three meals per day. Don't snack

* Don't confuse being thirsty with being hungry. Drink enough water.
Well, proton and wine have made significant advancements. You should check out your Steam library on protondb, that'll show what can run on Linux and what can't.
Would need time travel for this interpretation to be true. Technically, ROC(TW)/PRC claims came first post WW2 at UN. So technically other parties who claimed after are interfering in ROC/PRC internal affairs/sovereignty, which post PRC recognition at UN, PRC is now entitled to defend. Through actions which all things considered, are pretty tame for a G5 member whose should get away with being more equal than the others.
I’ve heard this before, but what does it really mean? Because we are able to still build muscle when eating less than 20g of protein
I didn’t vote, but personally it seems somewhat obvious to me that the best thing we can do for existing ecosystems, if they have not already been disturbed, is to leave them as they are. Generally the creatures that live there evolved to live there, and the conditions required for the ecosystem to thrive are complex. What I’ve seen of ocean mining involves completely scraping the sea floor of everything and extracting the metals from the disturbed material. Proposed machines leave behind them a complete wake of destruction. There is no possibility to make things better than if we had left it alone.

The only opportunity we have to make things better is in areas we have ourselves destroyed. Then we have a chance to improve it. But if something is undisturbed we can’t really improve upon that.
There’s a difference between being able to speak and being offered common platforms even when they’re available, versus someone loudly disturbing everyone around them repeatedly who did not choose to attend an event, and which is not in a public or semi-public space.
History and culture.
It’s not clear that mastodon can do anything better. The problem is the federated architecture. Lumping server admin together with moderation and username namespacing and making the user choose it up front results in a clunky protocol design and user experience.

Nostr is similar to mastodon, but the servers have no role beyond making posts available to clients. The role of the server has been reduced as much as is easily possible. The question of who pays for these has not been solved, but at least users can switch between servers instantly, and even use many at once, so the choice is not very important.
Free speech isn't about protecting the speech we agree with. It's about protecting the speech we don't agree with.

Yes, it does protect nazis. It is also our best bet against nazis, and a great many Minister-of-Truth-wannabes have a hard time understanding it.
I had been wondering who uses the Pennsylvania Dutch wikipedia, https://pdc.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haaptblatt , but the people (person?) behind this site are evidently not it.

(a) I would be into almost all of the precepts, but f2f instead of text? Hard nope. Would that make me a New Reformed Menno?

(b) I don't believe the Amish (unlike, say, Mormons) are into preparedness per se, they just may give that impression because they are very into minimising dependencies upon the English.
(Gelassenheit is almost anti-prepper.)
I kinda doubt it: doing so would decrease profits, because you wouldn't, for instance, be able to pay a tiny amount to just watch one show on Disney+ instead of having to buy a full subscription.

Instead, it's going to be like cable TV and landline telephone service: something new will come along to attract people's attention, and they'll just keep pissing customers off, and as more and more leave, the service will get worse and worse, and the prices higher and higher, to take advantage of the suckers who refuse to leave, until the whole thing finally implodes.
I'm lazy about cooking and tend to eat a lot of pre-prepared food. I've found it useful to only buy small portions so that I'm not tempted to eat more than I actually need to. I was surprised at how much less food would keep me full and energetic through the day.
> There is no crime in telling people to ‘vote this Wednesday.’ There is no crime of ‘misinformation.’

The Department of Justice would disagree with you:

“Social Media Influencer Charged with Election Interference Stemming from Voter Disinformation Campaign” [1]

Some guy tweeted in 2016 encouraging Hillary Clinton supporters to ‘Vote from Home’ by sending an SMS to a certain number. For this and other tweets, he was charged with violating 18 USC 241, which prohibits “conspir[ing] to injure, oppress, [..] any person [..] in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States”, where the right in question was the right to vote. With the justice system being as slow as it is, the indictment only happened in 2021 and the case is still pending at the district court level. [2]

His lawyers argue that his actions were protected by the First Amendment; this is a novel legal question with no Supreme Court precedent on point. [3]

[1] https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/social-media-influencer-charg...

[2] https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59249282/united-states-...

[3] https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/douglass-ma...
> There is probably a maximum mass that can sustain such a dumb ideology.

I've read my grandmothers' diary, she had quite a bit to say about the previous time people underestimated the size of that maximum mass. There are very large numbers of people that will be happy to sustain such a dumb ideology if it is presented to them in such a way that it presses the right buttons. Fear is a very powerful motivator, as are frustration and jealousy and clever people will be more than happy to take advantage of these facts to push their revolting ideologies.
Ah yes… factor the number 100000 in some way, and then say “if only just”
It rarely ends with anything else. Most people are all talk and will back down if confronted in a nonphysical way. If they are going to resort to fisticuffs they are going to wind up in jail for it.
Visiting a foreign country and walking 5-15km a day is a sure fire way to lose weight
Also, a person with crazy ideas with no one to talk to but other similar people due to restrictions on speech and debate is not likely to become MORE sane or LESS resentful.
Was reading the policy document when this “innocuous” paragraph struck me. Am I misunderstanding something?

> Regarding freedom of teaching, faculty do not have total discretion over their course content. For example, a class titled “Beginning Chinese” cannot be taught as an advanced calculus class. And department heads would be within their rights to consider faculty members’ expertise in the process of making or adjusting teaching assignments. Working within our standard administrative structures such as curriculum planning committees, faculty generally should be able to teach the scholarly content they wish. Academic freedom does not give faculty members the unfettered right to advocate political beliefs in their classrooms that are irrelevant to the course content. Such political expression should be grounded in the faculty member’s expertise, relevant to the subject matter, and consistent with both sound pedagogical principles and the achievement of learning objectives.
The exercise of academic freedom with respect to research, publication, and teaching takes place in a context of scholarly rigor. Evaluating the strength of arguments and the quality of ideas is intrinsic to research and education processes. Aside from cases where evidence of invidious discrimination exists, faculty members cannot claim that the denial of tenure based on a professional assessment of the faculty member’s scholarship constitutes censorship. Nor can a student receiving a less than desired grade in a class claim that wrong answers are a form of protected speech. Though faculty and researchers have a good deal of freedom, that freedom is exercised in an academic context in which disciplinary competence and professional judgment are crucial to knowledge production and education.19
Freedom of intramural expression means that faculty members should be able to speak their minds about their own institution and its policies. MIT strongly values this freedom

Isn’t this saying “stay in your lane and only express political views if it’s relevant to your academic discipline”. An engineering professor might have a thing or two to say about copyright but since their academic profession isn’t law, they’re not allowed to opine on it? A biology professor might not agree with climate policy of the current administration and that means they can’t speak their opinion because they’re not a climatologist nor a political scientist? Isn’t academic freedom supposed to be the opportunity to mix in thoughts from outside the field so that blind spots can be examined? Stratifying and isolating freedom of speech in this manner would seem to encourage intellectual isolation. Not something I’d want to see from an institution that’s supposed to be educating the next generation of great thinkers who aren’t bound by conventional thinking. Of course, I probably just misunderstood what this is saying. I didn’t go to MIT and I never did do well in English class.
> "It seemed to me the universe is in a process of coming alive. Consciousness is blossoming and propagating to colonize the universe, and life on Earth is one of many bright spots in the cosmic birth of consciousness."

I had much the similar feeling during my first LSD trip, but haven't met too many others who shared this same idea. Life is the means by which the Universe organizes and becomes aware of itself. It's our Darwninistic telos to get off of this rock and colonize the stars.
Liquifying and shipping NG is far more expensive than just pushing it through a pipeline. Why do you think the NordStream pipelines were even built?

And again, for the nth time I'm asking you here, where the fuck are you going to get it from? If it was so easily available, Europe wouldn't be screaming right now, and no one would care about Russia.
This comment is exactly an example of why “free speech at all costs” is unlikely to work.
In this case, many of the divergences exist because the standard AArch64 ABI (AAPCS) wasn't finalized at the time that iOS had to lock its ABI. Several items are actually the standard version from pre-finalization versions of AAPCS, and couldn't be changed to match the standard because iOS binary compatibility was already locked in.
Edit: Apparently broad spectrum antibiotics can actually lead to antimicrobial resistance [1][2]

—-

> I actually think this is good since it means we postpone usage of, and thereby resistance to, any new antibiotics.

This is true if you use them in isolation but I thought broad spectrum antibiotics, aka many at once, is what is typical now to slow down development of resistance? In this case you’d want to develop a few new ones and deploy them in batch.

1: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broad-spectrum_antibiotic

2: https://www.science.org/content/article/combining-antibiotic...
> I don’t know what pathological case you stumbled on to make a single file take 3s tho

It's an empty file. It's not a "pathological" use case. It's simpler than "hello world". It's literally the simplest possible use case. I do have to say I have a fairly slow laptop, but everything else is plenty fast enough.

> I find it hard to believe you made the choice to write naked JS instead of TS

Why is this hard to believe? Most things I work on are a few hundred lines, maybe 2,000 lines at the most. Not huge, but not trivial either. Some of these are personal projects, on some I work as a contractor. Many have an uneven pace of development: lots for a bit, then nothing for months or years. I want stuff to "just work", even after 2, 3, or more years, and I don't want to update loads of tooling every time I come back to it. This is already a bit of an issue in JS-world in general, so I try to keep things simple. This means, among other things, simple build steps. With a okay-ish performance (doesn't even need to be "fast") you can keep builds very simple. With the current performance this is a lot harder and you need a lot more complexity to make it work smoothly.
Important enough to promulgate a wrong spelling of deprecate?
Really depends on the company, full stop.
Huh, I did, many times. I think it’s more where we end up working, than universal applicability of these things.

(And I didn’t know about any of the data structures or algos mentioned in the post - I’d never have been hired at a FAANG)
Free speech can be used as the crowbar to motivate enough people to commit acts of vandalism and terrorism. Yes, those are illegal. Do you need something that can prohibit that? If you don't want to have a '6th of January' groundhog day every couple of years then that might make some sense. Let's see what the final outcome of that is. My prediction: if it isn't dealt with forcefully the only thing that will happen is that it will continue until they get it done.
Not when they are in groups. And that's the first thing these people do: get organized so they're not longer just by themselves when aiming for confrontation.
Generally you'll want to head them off at Normandy before they make it down to the pub.

To put it another way, the problem of Nazis is not a problem of free speech. It's a problem of people who are actively violating other people's boundaries.

Nazis love it when you make it about speech because then everyone starts arguing tautologies instead of investigating and prosecuting criminal behavior.
Do you know how that supply is making it to china? Almost all of the pipes go from Russian oil fields west to Europe. Even the pipelines that travel east have to contend with a reality that Nobody lives in the Gobi desert. Instead what is happening is oil is being shipped by boat to non-aligned parties like India and China. Supposedly using ship-to-ship transfers[1] to obscure origin, or because Russian ports can't support supertankers.

And all of the PLA's ambition is in the South China sea, which means even if you rely on Russia to supply you wartime energy, it has to ship through a battlefield. And anyone opposed to it has a pretty free hand to say "mine now" as the path meanders by Turkey, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, India, Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka etc.

[1]: https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/commodities/russian-oil-ship-to-ship-transfer-anonymous-chinese-buyer-sanctions-2022-8
I use a Blogger blog.
Agreed!

Your comment has made me realize that I could have written my original comment more clearly; my dissatisfaction in re the MIT Free Speech Alliance (if my impression was accurate) isn't about political agendas, but about deception – promoting free speech for the moment as a tactic rather than out of a dedication to the ideal, while claiming the latter.

Indeed, when people say "let's keep politics out of it", they're in effect trying to quell any challenge to the status quo, which arguably is inherently political, and this should probably be called out more often.
Restaurants in general are a problem. If you've ever wondered why restaurant food tastes better than the same meal at home, it's because step 1 of fancy restaurant cooking is to, sometimes literally, toss in a few whole sticks of butter as a flavor enhancer.
I'm not sure how much value such a feature would have, but both of your points are already addressed by the original wish.
A passed in callback would have to be pure too and a getter function couldn't be called unless it's marked pure too. WebStorm already colors property access differently then the custom getter, why wouldn't Typescript be able to differentiate?

Your last argument is confusing: the same applies to everything in typescript.
You can also pass in a string to a field that's demanding a number by using "as" so you never have any type guarantees in TS, there is value in it nonetheless.

And the same would surely apply to pure functions
(I.e. inpureFunction as PureFunction)()...) It could still be a valuable feature anyway