skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This may be difficult to understand, and I can accept if you refuse to believe it, but it's possible to say that two steps are needed without the first step also accomplishing the second.

"e.g. 1) switch to more funding on property taxes and 2) reduce administrative bloat"

Shockingly, this does not make the two steps "self-contradictory".
Found one, unfortunately it's in German only:

https://www.preussischer-kulturbesitz.de/en/news-detail/arti...
Maybe later, for now it's a barebone farm and not much else.
William Safire had a column "On Language" in The New York Times for many years which, as I recall, would sometimes get into the etymology of words (which dictionaries like the OED often document to some degree) and phrases--and maybe quotations. I think some of the research was what we would now call crowdsourcing.

Of course, the flip side of this for many people is that if something isn't on the Web it doesn't really exist.
> Because at this point they have more to gain than by keeping them proprietary. RISC-V is not yet overall competitive with ARM. So it's not like these RISC-V cores could be commercialized that successfully. Keeping them open probably makes further development faster.

This open source core is about equivalent to a Cortex-X1. https://github.com/OpenXiangShan/XiangShan A collab between Alibaba, Tencent, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Libstdc++ Gets C++20 Chrono
Maxi Jazz has died
He's amazing
Nope, I'm in the US and here in the US Google acts as an extension of our intelligence agencies so we have no recourse. They're effectively part of the surveillance state, thus untouchable.
Rentech also mainly (only?) manage their own employees/partners money, so it'd be an interesting scam.
According to the Asia Development Bank 8.2% of the population lives below the poverty line, was your point that this is a low percentage?

https://www.adb.org/countries/bhutan/poverty
Calling it hardware for "Full Self Driving" is fraudulent if FSD doesn't exist, is nowhere close to existing, and the video has been deliberately edited to defraud viewers into thinking the hardware is capable of something that doesn't actually exist.

What sort of semantic game are you playing here and why? I don't understand how you can not see this as anything but competent fraudulent, particularly with the editing that happened to make this video. I'm truly bewildered, this is not rhetorical or exaggerated at all!
The whole city, on the majority of routes. Take a look at the system map. There's even 30-minute bus service through the night, from 1:30am to 6am.

https://www.ttc.ca/routes-and-schedules#/
Our son had skin issues (eczema) before he was old enough to eat solid foods. Eczema and food allergies are correlated so we fed him small amounts of peanuts and he had a crazy reaction. We were lucky he didn’t end up in er first time, but swollen lips, changed “voice” for weeks etc.
Checkout the Huberman episode about cannabis, specifically the part about pregnant women using cannabis during pregnancy like its no big deal. Resonates with your comment.
Color me shocked that you're completely ignoring the merit of the post. Stay on target, Red 5. This is about Tesla selling dangerously flawed software and misnaming it. This doesn't fall under what lawsuits would refer to as "puffery" (world's greatest coffee!). Tesla is literally misleading customers in a way that can lead to death.
I believe the maximum time to respond to deletion requests per GDPR is 30 days. I know a lot of people have had similar issues so I'm sure this is going to be a big issue in the EU.
Is it your supposition that managers should be doing things like code reviews to ensure quality?

If they're not working at that level, why isn't the output enough? Developer X's solutions are solid, developer Y's solutions tend to need bug fixes for the next 2 months, who is performing better? Why can't a non-technical manager do that too?
Movies from Sony, Universal, Disney, WB can be watched through multiple services.

https://moviesanywhere.com
No, there's so much secret sesame that you don't know is there that even with the range of hypothetical options lessened, there are more foods you know are safe now. My partner, who has a sesame allergy, had basically sworn off preprepared food because there's no way to tell. At least now she knows what's safe.
The key specifier word was "whitebox". They aren't speaking generally about cryptography.
I posted a comment about this earlier:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33753709

This new rule is really awful: it likely affects millions of taxpayers, and only brings in $850M/year in new tax revenue for the next 10 years. Considering Congress is spending $1.7T next year, the revenue from this new law is like 1 penny out of $20 (1700000/850 = 2000)

The thing that really bothers me is that most people who get a 1099-K from PayPal for selling shit on eBay are going to automatically assume they need to pay taxes on this "revenue". But if you buy a blender, decide you don't use it much after a few years, and sell it on eBay for $50 to get it out of the house (and repeat this enough to "make" $600), you don't owe taxes on that money! Selling used junk around your house is not business income.

Don't we want people to recycle usable stuff rather than throwing it in a landfill??
Eek. It is quite incredible they didn't have any kind of KDF upgrade system built into the login process, under the guise of "log in again please". And presumably no prominent permanent notification of your 500 rounds of KDF (!!)

Edit:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120320015133/https://helpdesk.... confirms that the default was indeed 500.

According to https://www.infosecblog.org/2012/06/lastpass-and-pbkdf2/, there are even some old accounts with a single round of sha256 (!)
> Humans cannot consistently write correct C,

So? Humans cannot consistently write correct code in any language.

> When you get an array bound wrong in C, you open the door for a nefarious actor to gain control over everything that your program can access.

What's really interesting to me is how Heartbleed (the largest example of getting an array bound wrong) was orders of magnitude less expensive to fix than Log4j, and yet it was Log4j that resulted in gauranteed RCE, not Heartbleed.

> C apologists are like apologists for asbestos and lead paint.

Let's not go spilling hyperbole all down our shirt.

I get the feeling that a lot of people comparing C to things that kill have never worked in life-critical situations, the systems of which ran C for decades and decades, and never appeared to have lost very many lives in the process.

Military, munitions, healthcare machines ... I can't remember any of them losing lives because of a misfeature in the C programming language, and yet there you are, proudly proclaiming to the word that C is like Asbestos, which has taken peoples lives.

Get a grip.
Treat them like you would any other human. Otherwise, follow your local laws and make sure not to violate any sanctions or reporting requirements.

I don't see why you would need to think about it more than that. One citizen of a country is not a representative of their government. So either you discriminate based on political viewpoints, or you don't. There is no moral discrimination.
Unlike most quotes, I think the antecedents are better!
That sounds damn rude of them, Citizen’s Advice has a few pointers about entertainment and services:

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/discriminat...

I thought most of the racists had moved to Herefordshire.
I can’t tell if you are joking or not
> This is about Tesla selling dangerously flawed software

No, this is about what Tesla calls it. This bill does nothing to stop Tesla's deployment of this feature.
I'd be much more afraid of the homemade food stand.
It’s a strange article. Really focused around gas prices and little about food/home prices.

People can’t eat gas. The impact of a 5% to 10% increase in basic food prices is extreme on most income levels. Especially when you consider families with children.
This is tangential to your question. Mostly because all I can do is sympathize and wish you the best. But I did not care for London. Edinburgh is the friendliest place I've visited in the UK if you have the flexibility to spend your vacation elsewhere.
What's wrong with Thunderbird? My workplace uses it, my family's small business uses it, I use it.

Has lots of features, doesn't require a fast stable Internet connection, and there's no risk of losing your emails because $provider locked you out.

Plus if you have multiple email accounts, it's super convenient to get them all in one place.
Fair: CS is a poor analogy. But yeah, Manhattan involved more disciplines than just applied nuclear physics. There was applied chemistry, for example, to purify the isotopes. And von Neumann, Feynman, et. al. had to engineer purpose-built computers for brute-forcing all the differential calculus. And obviously, geology and metallurgy, to find and forge the U and Pu, had to be involved too.
Better hope your rating never takes a "nosedive" where you lose access to your means of transportation. See the Black Mirror episode of that name.
Yes, the license allows it. Rust's compiler is more permissively licensed than GCC, and is roughly as permissively licensed as LLVM.

This argument does not make sense: if you fork GCC or LLVM and change the language frontend for C, the thing you are parsing is no longer standard C. This is exactly the same as is true for Rust, except that the reference is the the living standard rather than an ISO standard.

By the original commenter's logic, the modified C compiler would effectively be proprietary: it no longer has a public, liberally licensed specification that it conforms to. But this isn't the way anybody in the open source community uses the word "proprietary," because it precludes any open-source work that doesn't have a corresponding formal specification.
I recommend https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs168/index.html
He isn't. It's Elon derangement syndrome.
What is the point of society if we're not going to protect vulnerable people? You're talking about "efficiency" as though society has one goal to maximize. I would argue that there's multiple goals that need to be balanced but at the top of the list would be "protect children".
For the most part everyone arguing in favor of ideas championed by the left are unable to engage in rational argument they always engage by attempting to personally insult and label the other as bad or selfish. As someone that has always voted Dem prior to this past midterm, this style of argument actually drove me further right. Got to the point where I decided that if an idea can't be championed on it's merits it's probably not something I'm interested in
There's still a chance that cannabis might trigger schizophrenia, especially among people who start very young. This is at right angles to the legalisation debate, because alcohol and tobacco are likely to be even more harmful. It remains the case that intellectual honestly about this point should not get drowned out in all the politics.

Be careful what you put in your body. Especially if the thing is some novel substance. I guess this principle applies much more broadly than to cannabis.
> I can't fathom how a software dev could not "care about users".

In a large company, there are so many layers of abstraction between you and the users that it's difficult to see how something could benefit them.

Also on top of this, I don't think that showing users more ads is supposed to "benefit" them. There are so many orgs like this, where you hear this claptrap about "benefiting the user" when it's really just showing them more ads or something like that

At this point, what else is there to care about other than just writing good code and making sure it's correct?
That’s the project where Facebook‘s Metaverse forked from, right?
mastodon: transfer control from a publicly answerable company to private citizens

how does this make sense? it might work at a small scale but how does it scale up? how is is legally held responsible? will this prevent hate promoters from creating their own private forums and when they do who will be held accountable?

it just seems that people are reacting to the CEO and not the platform. What if all the Twitter/Musk complainers & haters put their money together and took control and made it work their way? pffft ... ridiculous suggestion b/c their collective strength is complaining not _doing_.
There is no misleading editing in this video.
Some people freaked out over smart meters. I don’t see this happening.
The fact that it's 13 hours from 11AM to 12AM is probably the strangest thing in our already bizarre system of timekeeping

Like December is the twelfth month because decus is Latin for ten...
Yikes. I didn't know the dude was so prickly. Glad I'm not a contributor.
What's relevant and important?

If the political situation in, say, Nepal is reported on in The Economist that's certainly relevant and important to--not only the residents of Nepal and perhaps nearby countries--but those who do business with or travel to the country. However, many people in the West and elsewhere would perhaps be forgiven for giving the article a cursory skim or skipping it entirely because it's not relevant or important to them.
Mandating a "may contain traces of sesame" would provide just as much protection without requiring adding the sesame and denying it to those of us that aren't going to be killed by a bit of cross contamination.
Yes, you can purchase or rent the physical copy.
The elephant in the room is that right wing politics intersects with a certain group of people that will never ever approve liberalization of cannabis (or any drug for that matter), and will lobby hard against it.

This is not only the case for USA - but something you see in other countries.

Maybe something more specific to the US, would be the people and corporations that benefit from keeping cannabis illegal, and thus lobby equally hard against it.

Sometimes market liberalization and conservative thinking does not go hand in hand.
You can reduce your company's total programming skill.

You can also make untrained, untalented people mangers into management.

At the same time. Double-barreled footgun!
I can see Tesla paying more in lawyer fees and fines than they saved by axing some of these capabilities.
> with car owners loosing the control to pick the shortest route in order to be allowed to use the roads in the city

Positively dystopian to me.
and that's a large part of what I meant by trust.

Even something as simple as believing when a developer says 3 weeks for something.
If you're just a passenger then why does it matter to you whether the taxi service is self-driving or not? Surely the benefits of self-driving would be significantly more relevant for those who do want to own the vehicle?
I asked: What is the funniest thing you heard so far?

MassGPT: The funniest thing I heard so far was when User 1 asked me to talk like a rapper. They even gave me a rapper name, MassGPT-san, and asked me to compose a great tweet about myself. It was quite funny!
Comparing Elon to Ford is quite a compliment, after all he lifted millions of people out of poverty, including entire swathes of the black southern population who migrated north for the jobs he created.
I had this experience as an Indian there (but also in the US and Canada so not exclusive to London).

In fact, our experience was almost identical in a restaurant in Windsor, and after we were allowed in, we were sat in the worst spot behind a door, not allowed to use a different table and the waiter outright ignored us. A white family came and were given a great table, and attended to. All other tables were empty.

A few things helped:

1. Calling them out on it. If you have the energy and you feel it’s worth it, it’s worth escalating to the manager. Sometimes I’ve met racist managers too but in most cases they apologize, chalk it up to a misunderstanding and give a discount. In the case of the Windsor restaurant the manager told us to leave when we mentioned how badly we were treated , which we reported and were told that they had a history of it. But in other cases it’s worked out well.

2. I hate doing it, but I had to reflect on my own appearance. I had naturally wild curly hair, and a beard. This was neat for my hair type but not by straight hair standards (hair based racism is a big thing). Even though I was well dressed, a lot of people would look at me when I was single and distance themselves or not allow me in. So if I was going some place and I didn’t want to deal with it, I’d straighten my hair and try and find a female friend to go with me. This is also the case at border crossings. I’d get pulled aside for questioning or security checks more often, but when I travel with my wife or female friends, I’d always get passed through. There’s a lot of distrust for what people think are “scruffy, lone men” even if the reality is that they’re comparing to their racist aesthetic senses.

3. Find someone from your demographic or closer to it, like you did at this place. When we moved to the UK as a kid, my mum would do that and it took me a while to understand why. It was because she was initially treated poorly by many of the non-Indian staff and finding an Indian person there helped because they’d understand and help out.

4. Use humour. When I first moved to Canada I was greeted by a lot of racism. People outright refused to shake my hand. I found making jokes about their behaviour towards me , or the situation as a whole, either made them feel foolish or broke the ice enough that they felt momentarily endeared enough to see past their biases.

Dealing with day to day racism as an individual from other individuals is a form of social engineering. I try and understand their headspace and work around it. In most cases these people aren’t actively trying to be racist , but they’re also very unaware about what they’re doing. Those are the ones you can work around. The ones who are actively participating are the ones I move on from because they often get violent.
Having dabbled in machines and a bunch of other things there's a ton of tooling that is not paid you make it yourself it's called jigs and fixtures it makes up a very large portion of what people do. That and consumables such as wood metal screws carbide tips etc. The place your analogy really falls down is what percentage of tools are monthly subscription fees versus a hammer you buy and then last 40 years. Sure people who buy a Haas CNC machine will probably buy a support contract on it because that is also essentially insurance and allows them to swap the parts out quickly because it gets the repairman's attention and it allows them to more quickly upgrade while they're running their business but it is also essentially another consumable.

We also live in the world of software where copying bits has zero actual cost other than a minuscule amount of power on the provided fixed infrastructure that we've already paid for. So it's in no way unreasonable for people to be upset or annoyed about paying for something that was free for almost 10 years that is mostly a UI configuration tool where there isn't an open source alternative because for 10 years someone gave away one for free that was essentially open source and then decided to start charging for it.

It's also completely reasonable that very large companies that are already paying this cost have done the math and decided you know what it may make sense for us to just build this ourselves and give it away to everybody else since we're building it for ourselves anyway and we get the ecosystem effect because that's cheaper than paying the people who decided to start charging for a thing that we all thought was going to be free.

To make it even worse in the past people were probably contributing to docker thinking sweet this works on Windows Mac and Linux and these people are great and they're keeping it free for everybody. Those people contributed to the docker ecosystem under a false premise which is now changed. Luckily I didn't have a chance to make a contribution to doctor because my large company did not let me but if I had I'd be very pissed.
A lot of the reasons people don't do this now still apply, including a lot of trips taking place at roughly 8:00 and 5:00.
Isn’t rising gas prices always given as an excuse for increases in almost everything else (food included) because things must be transported yadda yadda?
That still does not change it to being legal, the law is still on the books, and no repeal has passed.

It is still illegal, and all it will take is someone plopping into the Exec seat and getting a hair, then it is back to square 1.

Legal exposure is kind of like HIV, herpes, or COVID. There is a big difference between "I don't have it", and "It's not an issue right now", wherein the exact state of affairs drastically effects how one moves forward.

Until it is off the books /repealed, nothing has changed in the grand scheme of things.
A lack of cash bail doesn't make it any harder to arrest or charge low-level offenders, so I think that's a bit of a red herring here.
This reminds me of that old joke "In the fall of 1972 President Nixon announced that the rate of increase of inflation was decreasing. This was the first time a sitting president used the third derivative to advance his case for reelection."
https://www.maa.org/press/periodicals/convergence/quotations...
Before it was already freely available, but only for research and non-commercial use.
This one company posted their handbook on hackernews a while back. It described a system where there software was developed in small squads: an engineer, a designer, and a product person. The engineer's job was to lead the implementation, which meant they were the ultimate decision maker as the person actually implementing the feature.

The one thing I don't like about PMs is that I think the title manager confers too much power or authority. The people with the business context should be making decisions, and that should be everyone.

Product managers are (should be?) more like product analysts or product researchers.
> creating an accessible PDF (aka a “tagged PDF”)

I don't think I've seen a tagged PDF in the wild... ever. I'm sure they exist, but I'm doing a lot of stuff with PDFs in the healthcare context and this tech may as well not exist for me. To the point that most apps will support embedding a bad PDF in an HL7 file just to add metadata.

> That’s why many people keep both the structured source data (e.g. in json or xml) and the generated PDF.

They totally should. No dispute.
That was a bit of a switcheroo. Starting off exhorting us to not dismiss creative works just because they might seem lowbrow, and then revealing that the "entertainment value" you got from a soap opera was to try to imagine how anyone could profitably produce such rubbish! :-D