skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Dunno about that. I subscribe to several newsletters. Dave Pell puts out NextDraft almost every weekday. https://nextdraft.com/. Also available on a website and via an iOS app.

There are several others I subscribe to, not all of which release daily (though I wish some of them did). So "no one" is the wrong term to use here.
In the vout dictionary, 'reet' is defined as 'right, yes, okay'.

https://fromtheothersideofthemirror.com/2009/04/09/the-origi...

Vout is Slim Gaillard's (very silly) language. Hear it spoken here with Bird and Dizzy, uh I mean Daz McSkiven Vout-o-roonee : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvxpIFZGfAE
Any nontrivial change to the base model will mean a lot of complexity in the API layer and degraded performance. Maybe that's worth it for you, maybe if you're exposing this data to hundreds of external users who don't need high performance. But I feel that for most usecases, barebones DB access is the better option.
Can you point to an actual error in the design of the study (please reference away, I want to know study flaws) and not just attack the scientist?
I score above average on IQ tests. Today, I would fail an algorithm interview. I have been building business apps. I can take an idea and make it a feature from 0 to database/api/web app.

I made a decision to just suck it up next year and practice algorithms. I have no problem getting offers from average companies. However, all the big dogs want data structures and algorithms. It doesn't feel right for me, but oh well.
... do people outside the US not use can openers?
Just to take you more seriously than other commenters

An ad hominem is an attack against the person and not the argument, and, well, you got a point there. I think what would make it a fallacious argument is if the attack against the person was irrelevant - pretend instead they shared incidents of inexcusable rudeness, which would be bad but irrelevant to the published findings. Instead it is highly relevant. Conflicts of interest undermine trust because they pervert outcomes. This is a situation where trust is very important, hence pointing out conflicts of interest to the person is relevant to the research.

Poisoning the well refers to pre-emptively discrediting a persons argument. Which, yeah, I could see that. Again though the information is relevant and in this case means that you should closely scrutinize their findings before use, as opposed to accepting them at face value due to a damaged trust.

I don’t think it makes sense to apply definitions from formal debate broadly to other contexts. If you had made the argument yourself that you implied by invoking those names you would have seen why they didn’t apply. It allows for extremely lazy rhetoric where you disregard any statement that makes some one look bad as an ad hominem. In a debate it makes sense to separate arguer from argument - in most other contexts it does not. You don’t separate the plumber from their previous plumbing, and you shouldn’t separate the report, the science, the scientists, the fucking statistics from the funding.
> Like it or not, nothing similar exists in any other language

Uh, what? It's not that different from the printf metalanguage (more powerful, sure, but not that different and inspired by printf)
Not everything has to have meaning. In fact, nothing has to have meaning for life to be worth living. It is a delusion we tell ourselves that something must have meaning to be worthwhile.

Having said that, I find value in relationships, not jobs or hobbies or things. Meaning? There is no meaning. Things are as they are. And it’s beautiful.
The public transport is so good that I never felt that way, especially since car owners have to pay obscene fees for a license to drive. But definitely it's not a good walking city. The heat doesn't help.
Borland Pascal was $150 in 1983 and considered affordably priced. (Items like linkers used to be sold separately but were integrated into the Borland Pascal development environment, this was seen as a bargain.) Inflation adjusted that’s $456 today.

I’m not saying I’d spend $500 for this but we are spoiled by all the great free tools today and lose sight of the big picture. Software developers in the US routinely make over $200k/yr. What is $500 for a tool if it really did make you more productive?
> Yeah, people who share similar values can communicate and work together better, but this isn't discrimination.

You would think it was if you were a member of e.g. a minority religion and no one would hire you for a job you were capable of doing.
He's 33 and doing internships? what am I missing?
It would matter if they were willing to lose the money to avoid a trial, for starters.
If they can afford a $250 million bond, they can probably afford the lawyer fees.
I've been using NNTP as a Gossip-type protocol for eventually-consistent pub/sub telemetry, monitoring, and notifications between partially-connected nodes in an unstable mesh since about 1995.
How long ago did you check the documentation? As of October this year the first full set of docs were published, with more to come: https://textual.textualize.io/
And the worse thing is that for any X, there are also many anti-X circle jerks and hate-bois with no self-awareness...
All nutritional science is everything but science.

Ignore studies. Eat Lindy. Eat no fruits from the past one thousand years, drink nothing from the past four thousand. Drink your milk (if your ancestors did).
This sounds like very bad behavior, sorry this happened to you.

What did the institution claim the justification was?

Taking an extra cut from a student, a group who are already generally pretty poor, is peak scumbag.
But OAuth2 can be used for authentication as well, no?
I would pick AMD Ryzen CPU and any Nvidia GPU with more ram.

If budget allows, I would pick RTX3090, if budget is too tight, look at RTX3080 or RTX3080Ti 12 Gb vram models. 10 gb vram models can be too small in the future or if you plan to use it for image processing.

I also am working mainly with image processing and segmentation, we mainly use RTX3080 and RTX3080Ti GPUs.

It should also be cheaper to pick components and build PC yourself.
They were fined for tracking to detect ad fraud. Advertisers are paying per click, often quite a lot, and if you charge them for clicks that don't represent real humans they get grumpy and go advertise somewhere else.
> letting that dread and anxiety and excitement wash over you while you genuinely contemplate making the switch.

But life also happens anyways. For me, a lot of what constitutes "staring into the abyss" is accepting that neither the original plan nor my alternate wish worked out as expected - despite the best laid plans - because almost nothing ever does. It's not just considering all the implications of a decision but accepting that things just work out differently than you hoped.

[edit] I guess I mean that accepting the inevitability of previous disappointments is as much or more a part of grappling with the abyss as is considering the future.
Why estimating user stories in man-days is beneficial for an engineering team
They actually allow up to 64 characters in the kernel: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/8395ae05cb5a2e31d3610...

This might just be for certain kernel things though. I don't see any regular processes that aren't truncated, but I see a bunch of kernel things that have more than 16 chars on my system.
> An open source solution pre-built ... saves you a lot of time and pain.

I haven't looked at the linked solutions specifically, but I've only rarely found this to be the case for generic protocols like this (especially anything around OAuth or OpenID). The open source solutions I've tried and given up on using always pull in hundreds of dependencies that have their own idiosyncracies as well as make a lot of undocumented assumptions and not be very well documented. Not to mention I still have to write code to use the "pre-built" solutions - usually more code than I would have had to write to just code the thing myself from scratch. They may be "better" from some perspective, but when I was working with OAuth, I tried (and tried and tried and tried) to use a pre-built solution for weeks until I finally gave up and just wrote my own in less than a day. Definitely longer and more painful to try to adopt somebody else's solution.
Exactly.

Even better would be a procedural rule that no Senator can vote on (or at least for) a bill that they have not personally read in its entirety. You want your bill to pass? Don't make it 4000 pages.
Flight History for Aircraft – N6387F
Dancing with the Stars.
"Copyright © LispWorks Ltd 2000-10"
I like the idea of contemplating uncomfortable ideas, but I hate the phrasing.

The abyss is void, nothingness. It is not a challenge; it is not something to be studied or resolved. It has no structure and offers no insight. "Staring in the abyss" is a suitable phrase for existential dread, cosmic despair, and metaphysical visions of hell. So, it is a good phrase for the worst of the worst parts of depression rather than good advice.
Docker on MacOS is slow and how to fix it
indeed, recreated thread. thanks
Password Requirements: Myths and Madness
I thought Alameda came first, before FTX. Also, the fraud was on the FTX side, not Alameda, hence it doesn't make sense for him to blame her for it?
A perfectly healthy-for-all elixir of pure human energy and nutrients: is it possible?
A few years back before Covid, I held biweekly open meetings for anyone to learn practical Git basics where I work. I had about 20 people come through (PhD's, Statisticians, etc.) Let's talk! My email is in my profile.
I have a set of "spade" drill bits for wood that once belonged to someone's grandfather. The operation of this style of wood drill bit is sometimes jokingly referred to as "slapping chunks of wood off" until a hole appears, and I agree - for the ones sold now. Not these ones.

They're noticeably sharper and truer than the ones you find now, more perfectly symmetrical in profile and grind, probably a half-dozen other subtle differences. When you drill a hole with one of these bits, all of the shavings are uniform and the sides of hole aren't ragged. There's less vibration, less heat, more progress.
I would imagine Huawei is doing that moreso due to sanctions, no?
My vote for River Raid, H.E.R.O., and Enduro. Cool fact that I only recently discovered: River Raid was designed and programmed by a woman, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_Shaw .
It seems like you have misunderstood something.

I just read the specification you linked. If I understand it right, it just specifies what we call a "Push gateway" in our last diagram in the "under the hood" section.

As in, it specifies how multiple servers can connect to a single (XMPP-speaking) push server. This is also evident from the excerpt I'm quoting:

>XMPP Push works between the user's XMPP server and two push notification services in tandem:

> The user's XMPP server publishes notifications to the XMPP Push Service of each of the user's client applications.
> The XMPP Push Service (as defined here) for a client application then delivers the notification to a third-party notification delivery service.
> The third-party (and potentially proprietary or platform-dependent) push service delivers the notification from the client application's backend service to the user's device.

UnifiedPush is the third-party push (or notification delivery) service here.
Please make an effort to come across as less antagonizing in the future.
I think this is the most probable explanation.

And the candidates needn't even be a tie. Maybe they have one candidate that's less experienced or a significantly less expensive hire but that is sufficient enough for what the role requires.

It can be really difficult to make a call like that, but at the end of the day, the smaller the company is, the more tightly controlling runway and burn rate could increase chances of survival.

I think this matters less once a company passes a sufficient headcount threshold. It's hard to draw a specific line in the sand, but perhaps ~75–100 people.
What's funny is that the UK could have been covered in fibre by the early 2000s. https://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/how-the-uk-lost...

BT knew in the 70s that fibre would be the best way forward, spun up factories to manufacture it, made it cheaper to lay than copper at the time. By the start of the 90s they were ready to start rolling it out locally, presumably in a FTTP configuration since it was cheaper than copper.

Thatcher didn't like that BT had a monopoly on the UK network, a monopoly she created by privatising them. So it was deemed anti-competitive for BT to roll out fibre nationwide, since she wanted to encourage private American companies to start building networks.

Makes you wonder what our internet would be like today, perhaps as good as South Korea.
I'm skeptical of the accuracy of those numbers. I feel like there's oftentimes little accountability in the nebulous academic bureaucracy.

An extreme case from earlier this year, in which a university employee was caught stealing: https://www.npr.org/2022/03/29/1089525660/a-former-yale-empl...

How much of this happens on a per-employee basis? What is the expected value of loss if everything is tallied and reconciled?
If your society focuses primarily on money, bad things.

If your society focuses on supporting a population's needs, not much.
People are obviously using discriminatory as a shorthand for pointlessly discriminatory. It's an argument against using qualities other than actual productivity in a hiring process. You're on the side defending that.
I think you’re agreeing with me. The university pays the student some absurdly small amount of money. Even ignoring the actual value added by that student, the university collects enough money for doing so that it comes out ahead.

Note that this may not be the case for teaching assistants. One can get a teaching assistantship without being attached to any particular grant. This money actually comes from the university (but the university may still charge fees to the student).

As a bit of trivia, the NSF GRFP is not a normal grant — it’s a highly prestigious grant directly to a graduate student. And it, at least historically, didn’t put up with this nonsense. GRFP gave the student a stipend and the university a smallish, fixed fee. This fee was well below the normal graduate fees. However, hosting NSF students is considered a privilege, most research groups want them (they’re free from the PI’s perspective), and as a result, the universities simply eat the “loss” and waive the balance of the fees.
>When will that happen?

April 17, 2028.
> as long as you restrict it to a particular domain

why?
As someone who has also had these issues with the crotch of pants wearing out, I would also suggest trying these options.

It's a combination of stretching and friction. Jeans have it especially bad because they have prominent seams right where the thighs touch, causing an extra large amount of friction. A gusseted crotch (which I believe the Ballroom jeans have) both helps with the stretching and moves the seams around.
With new tax credits, clean energy beats gas plants almost every time
> Personally I think "coding interviews" are just very insulting and speak of an awful state of the industry. Imagine giving an electrical engineer a 1st year undergrad assignment to make sure he really can calculate the properties of a basic circuit. Seems like a good reason to just walk out.

I don't want to defend whiteboard programming, not at all. But I think one can get a lot of value out of simple concrete questions.

Example: Person applying to C/C++ systems programming job -- think low-level file formats, kernel interaction, custom network protocol -- without understanding hex numbers.

Me, the interviewer, asking what 0x10 is in decimal (feel free to use pen & paper!) is a lot quicker than trying to sniff out a good bullshitter that you've allowed to be in control of the conversation.

No, I really don't think you can do the job without knowing hex.

Yes, I really think any background that would have prepared you to be successful at the job would have had you interacting with binary data in some form. (Saying you personally prefer octal would have been a plus, not a minus -- it would have communicated experience.)
> No, the database should not be the answer to all your data problems. Yes a microservice may be the best answer.

Or to put it another way: No, microservices should not be the answer to all your data problems. Yes, using the DB may be the best answer.
> Lost Horizon

I liked this one when I read it years ago, but when I tried to re-read it aloud to one of my kids[1] I discovered that most of Hilton's characters' dialog read exactly the same—they have no voice—plus the prose was really clunky to read—uniquely so among the oddball books I read aloud to my young kids, and I read them some a lot older than that, plus a couple contemporary to Hilton's book, so it's not an age-of-the-writing problem. It was so unpleasant to read aloud that I didn't make it past the first chapter. Really soured me on the book.

[1] Hey, when they're young enough, it hardly matters what you're reading to them, may as well be something you want to read, unless you're reading them a picture book.

[EDIT] LOL, actually, now that I think about it, Gatsby was another one I read aloud to one of my kids. No problems with that one.
It's not the whole base, but a large parcel of it. Other sections have already been developed for housing and retail businesses. A reporter for the Asbury Park Press ought to have known this.
I would have been interested in reading such a blogpost yeah, I feel like I got catfished :)
Yep, which is why materialized views don't tend to work great for a lot of tasks where they initially seem to be the most natural implementation, particularly almost any view that's a feed or aggregate of data in the system over all time. It's so easy to just play with a simple SQL select query until you get it working, then throw it into a materialized view. It'll probably even work for a long time! But as soon as the data in the system grows and that refresh starts getting slower, you're stuck with a (potentially tricky or at least frustrating) migration to another implementation (maybe something like event sourcing).
When working as a junior dev in title I had a designated "mentor" to work with/direct questions towards.
I'm more a believer in the stance of "everyone has something to teach" and just try to learn things from whoever, whenever possible - but also understand this is somewhat a cop out for the original question
The character is a bomb tech in the military, spent years in high pressure situations trying to make sure a bomb doesn't go off. But then his time in the military ends and he's back in normal life at the grocery store. He's looking at the endless options for breakfast cereals. And he can't do it. He could handle bombs but not endless choice.
It is available [1] as a core for FPGAs (possibly used in some obscure ASICs to boot), and it is very possible that those applications need fairly current support. The ColdFire processors came in up to 300MHz, and modern FPGAs could probably enable even higher speeds. There are variants with Ethernet [2], so security is probably a real concern.

I would very much like to learn how to get one 1) running on an FPGA 2) running Linux and then 3) set it up to automatically run new builds.

[1] https://silvaco.com/design-ip/embedded-processors/
[2] https://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1703092.pdf
I’m betting you’re lying, given your complete denial of reality.

Specifically, it’s really only Republicans that are in denial that Stewart Rhodes and his associates have been convicted of seditious conspiracy.

In very simple language, this means that the argument that they engaged in a peaceful protest is complete and utter bullshit to anyone who has the ability to perform simple google searches.

Again, this argument has already been definitively refuted in federal court.
https://docs.bunny.net/docs/bunny-ai-image-generation#suppor...
Have you looked at Quel? We have multiple languages to run our code on generic CPUs (C, Python, Java, Ada, Go, Rust, Lisp, etc.) Why must we have only one database language that doesn't do a very good job at Codd's relational calculus?

So many people have drank the kool-aid that SQL is the answer. Maybe it's time to change this.

The success of ORM's could be thought as the market voting against SQL.

https://www.holistics.io/blog/quel-vs-sql/
I'm a full time Nim developer and have been for over half a decade. It's completely spoiled me for other languages, it is just ridiculously productive. Rather than an ah-ha moment, it was more a gradual transition from "where's the catch?" to "there's no catch!".

The simple answer is this: anything I want to do, I can do in Nim easier than other languages, while also having direct access to C/C++/JS ecosystems as well.

Productivity:

1. I write pseudocode, it compiles fast and runs at C speeds. Programming is fun again!

2. No `::!>><>^<<@{};` cruft everywhere. Write as you want to read, even spanning multiple lines is clean and without separators.

3. Procedural: only data types and code. No need for OOP/Trait abstractions to be forced into everything (it's there if you must).

4. UFCS and overloading by parameter types make everything naturally extendable: `len("string")` can also be written `"string".len` or `len "string"` - you don't have to remember which way round it goes, and 99% of the organisational benefit of OOP emerges from this lexing rule. A compile time error if you use the same name and parameter types, so no ambiguity.

5. Sensible defaults everywhere: type inference, stack allocated and pre-zero'd variables by default, extend with GC/manual management by type (`type HeapInt = ref int`), GC is deterministic with scope based destructors and move semantics as an optimisation rather than a straight jacket, detailed opt-in control down to assembly as you wish.

6. Arguably the best compile time support of any language.

7. AST procedural metaprogramming is a core language feature. It's hard to express how powerful and well integrated this is. You can just chuck code around and recombine it effortlessly. Whether it's simple DRY replacements, automating serialisation from types, custom DSLs at your convenience, or even generating entire frameworks at compile time from data, you effectively have another dimension to programming. I can't go back to flatland, now.

8. Flexible static typing that's as strict (`type specialId = distinct int`) or generic as you want, with concepts matching any statement against a type. You can also calculate or compose types from static values which is really nice.

9. Low overhead and high control makes it great for embedded: https://github.com/EmbeddedNim

10. Fantastic FFI that can even use C++ templates, along with loads of converters/wrappers like c2nim, futhark, pas2nim that add even more sugar to FFI interop.

Portability and glue:

- Single portable executable output.

- Compiles to C89/C99, which covers basically every piece of hardware.

- Compiles to C++ so you have C++ ABI compatibility.

- Compiles to JavaScript.

- Compiles to ObjC.

- Compiles to LLVM.

- Excellent Python interop (see: Nimpy).

- Libraries for interfacing with C# and .Net.
I've tried a lot the password safes/vaults, and none of them work nearly as well as Chrome/Googles password manager

You can even use it on iOS, and even use it by default. Even apples Keychain password manager works pretty well if you're all in on apple ecosystem. Only reason I see why you would not use it is if you're not using Chrome or Safari, which is most people.

Yeah, yeah, google evil