skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you want to create Mac apps from other platforms then check out Conveyor:

https://hydraulic.software/

It can build, sign and notarize Mac apps (and Windows apps, and Linux apps) with auto update and can do so from any platform. So you can ship to everyone from Linux if you want. It also does auto update, generates a download page that detects your OS and it includes control over low level OS-specific things like setting entitlements, custom deb dependencies, Windows manifest extensions etc.

Notarization as a process is actually OK in my view. Yes it sucks to have to pay, especially for hobbyist stuff. Still, process-wise it's pretty lightweight and it seriously beats having a virus scanner intercept and rummage through all your file IO all the time. Windows has a lot of problems with aggressive AV engines mucking up programs and macOS doesn't, because notarization is in effect an ahead of time virus scanner that moves the work off the end user laptop. Also these days the notarization protocol is open and documented.
Maybe it's different where you live, but in my experience (norcal/SF bay area) it's been rather trivial to find rooms to rent by the month when needed.

Especially if you're willing to take a room at least a bit outside of the hip downtown spots.

Maybe find a room somewhere on the commute route that's substantially closer to work, but in an affordable neighborhood? Is there a college town on the route where spare rooms in homes are often rented to people your age for some extra income?

Not all shared housing situations are awful. I wouldn't let some pathologically bad experience eliminate the option altogether. Just don't get locked into a long-term lease and you can always just roll the dice again next month. Try be more flexible.
I don't think that's what the Raytheon prototype is doing. It sounds like they're capturing some of the mechanical energy from the engine during descent and putting that into the battery for later use. Hybrid cars do that, when the driver requests an amount of power too far from the most efficient band they make up the difference by charging/discharging the battery. Knowing the target usage lets the engineers make more aggressive tradeoffs to optimize efficiency for that band.
> Most people throughout history didn't look at the rich with anything but contempt.

Citation needed. I don't think wealth as the main cause of contempt.
> They assumed that an omnipotent God existed.

I actually doubt that they assumed that. Much more likely their belief in an omnipotent God was based on some more fundamental assumption, like that the Bible is true.
> the best explanatipn we have

Exactly my point. So in absence of a better explanation we will just acceptance SOMETHING to give us some comfort so we can distance ourselves from religious people. Doesn't matter that our BEST explanation may not be true
It's been this way for a long time. Tiny tax credits for poor malnourished children must be "funded in advance", while ridiculous unauditable military spending rains down from heaven.
https://blog.artsper.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/escher-2...

Consider the gray pixel in the center a placeholder, much like Escher's place holder in the above image (because he couldn't think of how to realistically depict what turns out to be the infinite fractal nature of the center)

> An edge, no matter how small breaks the cross.

My very weak intuition says that an edge of infinite smallness would not.
It’s odd that their status page mentions scheduled maintenance and everything is still green.
If anyone is actually going to use this for their top secrets, I can find two things to be aware of.

* When you decrypt then close the tab and open the tab again via the recently closed tab, the password is still there.

* Browser extensions could read the contents of the webpage.

So if anyone is going to use this, they should do it in a "clean" incognito browser without any extensions.
Generation ship is a trope with countless examples, no single one. It's practically a vocabulary word like 'space ship'.

I would have said Brian W. Aldiss 'Non-Stop' or Ben Bova 'The Exiles' or Harlan Ellison 'The Starlost', but only because they just happen to be some of the examples I happen to have encountered and found particularly memorable. I've probably read and forgotten 20 others.
No, but that's not how science works. The general assumption is that the person making a provable conclusion (ie. that there IS a purpose) has the burden of proof.

If I claim to have a magical invisible dragon in my garage it's on me to prove otherwise, not for you to prove it doesn't.
Agreed, plus:
5. Be a gracious human being regardless of context. Memories are long-term things.
Yes, Jami calls are p2p whenever possible, and TURN is used when not (e.g. due to overly restrictive firewalls).

Yes, Jami supports conferencing. One can add additional participants to a 1-on-1 call on the fly, effectively making it a conference. Alternatively, one can enable rendezvous mode from account settings, in which case incoming calls to that account will be added to a conference (similar to a Jisti room).
Currently, WebAuthn/Passkeys are only designed for signing; you could re-use a challenge to be signed, but then the signature is as secure as a password (i.e., your Passkey would produce the same signature every time.)

WebAuthn also only works in secure contexts (HTTPS)—you couldn't make it work in a plain .html file.
In their defense, they'd probably get a stick up their ass over white neighbors wrenching on cars too.
This was a conservative area at the height of Republicans' push to teach "intelligent design" in schools instead of evolution.

I wouldn't be surprised if this was the result of tribalism, or deliberately not teaching certain things to keep parents happy. At the time, parents were sending kids to private schools so they wouldn't be "indoctrinated" into an atheist/scientific agenda with evolution in the curriculum.
Eh, I'm not with you on the whole anti capitalism angle to all this, I think "what's mine is mine and what's yours is yours so leave me alone and I'll leave you alone" about covers it.
and Jitsi (https://jitsi.org/)
Per TFA, apparently not in Brazil...
I'd be happy to see the wallet emptied.

This is what the bounty is for. I just hope whoever cracks it lets me know how they did it and how hard it was.

This is what a bounty is, no?
I've been doing this for decades and I don't even know what an Xcode dotfile is.

Maybe you mean .DS_Store files? That's probably best described as a Finder dotfile... For that, maybe just add the line ".DS_Store" to your .gitignore (or the equivalent for your SCM software)?
Exactly my point. If it's OS locked it's not collaborative for me.

Collaboration should be about lowering barriers, not rising them.
I don’t know if it was me, but I generally agree that SPACs seem like a bad idea for everyone except the person dumping the result on the public for quick cash.

See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25900091
The very fact life is billions of years old and all these religous texts don't even mention about it even once or the fact that dinousaurs existed for hundreds of millions of years really makes a lot of organized religions look like fools. Anyone who reads about evolution will realize that we are not special, our species is not special and god's son being a human is just a narcisstic idea ignorant people came up with 2000 years ago.
The collaboration features of Apple's apps also work in their web apps, which work in any modern browser on any OS.
You're absolutely right - I meant threads, which are parallel statemachines.
I do appreciate your replies and can see where you are coming from as it pertains to the article. Zoning is what zoning is - and that’s to be covered by the auto shop or pet store or etc etc.

What “triggers” me is this idea that the default state is “consider investment” and not “does it harm one’s ability to enjoy their home.”

Sure you cab define “enjoy” as “watch value go up” but that’s clearly not what I mean.

The whole “and it harm none, do as you please”, imho, does not consider the wallet.

Which, when thinking about investments, is thinking about class divide and puts $ over people.

My neighborhood is largely renters. I’m a 1 family across from another 1 family. On my sides are multi families. Renters. Owned by corporations but not kept up. Some in pretty crappy disrepair.

If I wanted to claim they affected my prop value, I could. But those corps have MUCH more money to defend and hit back (my house needs paint, etc) … just the same. (That’s not my style though as said earlier)

Anyway. I’m tired and rambling. I do appreciate the replies and I do hope I’ve helped some bit to look at anything that comes out of the gate thinking $ before people - is widening the gap and harming people.
Jitsi: More secure, more flexible, free video conferencing
Typescraper
Exactly. How many spacs are positive roi since being released
you've moved the goalpost.

Also: If we had a cashless society things would be different, but we don't, so they're not. These what-if's don't actually help the poor.
You know the IT media is full of hacks when they all studiously ignore the fact that the reason Flash was ultimately abandoned is that it would allow app developers to bypass the appstores of Apple and Google.

The two will never create anything to match Flash.

Even Microsoft abandoned Silverlight for the same reason and it is why Mozilla abandoned Shumway because they don't want to bite Google's hand.
As a religious believer, I upvoted this because I think you have a very good point--denying sensory evidence without a good reason is weak. The strongest argument for religion, the Aquinas-style one, is that faith fills in the missing pieces of what we see and hear, not that it replaces them with outrageous lies.
I should have qualified that with "violently at odds with the scientific view of reality" (I've gone back and edited my original comment). And it's not hard to see how this can happen. Quantum mechanics is pretty violently at odds with most people's intuitions.

> those who hold YEC beliefs have an inconsistent belief system

No, that is absolutely not what I am saying. Their belief system is, for the most part, logically sound, and so it is consistent. But it is violently at odds with science, and so they end up with conspiracy theories to explain why scientists believe in evolution so overwhelmingly. Conspiracy theories are improbable, but they are not inconsistent.
Be more specific. What background of which author? What quality of hosting site?
Note that active development seems to be continuing here:

https://github.com/secure-sw-dev/checkedc-llvm-project
Shooting Stars with iTelescope.net
Did anyone check if they actually neutered a cat? That seems more relevant...
> violently at odds with reality

Most of the views people have that they call reality are conclusions drawn from interpreting observations based on assumptions. They aren't repeatedly observable or a case where the observation is shows "reality" without interpretation based on assumptions.

This is how people come to different conclusions.

Learning to understand the different assumptions people make for all views was enlightening for me, personally.
Reminder that all argumentation about the impact of AI on society, industry, etc., should be made with great care with respect to prediction.

It is a very common trope to see assertions about what AI does and does not do, and how this naturally limits impact in various ways.

Every assertion about such limits should be bracketed, always, by, "today."

Not because every such limit will fall within some specific timeframe; but because we continue to see advances which make prior arguments of this type appear woefully shortsighted and naive.

IMO we as of yet are literally unaware of what the natural limits, should they exist, are. We are aware of a great many problems, always have been; but we are also finding that a surprising number of them fall before "scaling" in ways not many predicted.

And computation continues to get cheaper. And resources continue to amass.

A useful question for me is what is the relative cost and timeframe to increase the resolution of indistinguishable replication behavior of a system from that of a human agent, in various domains.

That is a moving, fractal, shoreline.

How fast is the tide coming in? How high shall it get? Those are the questions.

Try to frame reasoning about impact in terms of such dynamicism.
I really do hear what you're saying and think you're making a great point.

The part that I think applies is that this is a "data at rest protocol". Communication protocols are assumed (but maybe shouldn't be - a la PRISM disclosures?) ephemeral.

As an attacker, I need to have been in the middle for that specific instance of the communication, and save it for decades, to attack it. Crypto agility shortens the window from a break or weakness to a fix, forcing any adversary who has not already recorded communication traffic to do so in a hurry.

In this setting as a "data at rest" protocol, the work to persist the ciphertext has been done for the attacker. If there's a weakness or break it's up the defender to clean up all copies of the old secret ciphertext that's out there and publish new ones. In cases where the secret has been cached (e.g. Wayback Machine) that may not be possible.

I hope you agree with this nuance that there's something the defender needs to consider. I agree with you that not all defenders will find this consideration will be decisive in their decision to use this method or not.
Also - you have to sign code on Windows too! If you don't then Edge will try as hard as possible to stop the user opening it, and AV scanners can get very curious about what you're doing. Maybe Steam doesn't care if your game is signed?

I didn't quite follow the logic around notarization either. Steam imposes more requirements and takes a slice of revenue! Notarization is a lot cheaper and faster than that. But I guess the idea is that Steam gives you features, whereas notarization is just a tax.
However, the soul isn't biological, so it is completely orthogonal to evolution.
To game search engine dupe detection maybe?
The Program was the first podcast that I ever subscribed to. I now listen to lots of podcasts and am grateful to The Program for getting me onboard the audio train. I actually enjoyed The Program so much that I cold emailed the creator and offered to have my startup sponsor an episode. It's been super fun working with IMS over the last few years and seeing what he has accomplished!
If I build a shed on my property that my neighbor doesn't like they could come with their hand out.

If I bulldoze my house and build a beautiful park, they'll never send me a check.

In my view this has to go both ways or neither.
I bet 1000 years will be enough as tech and math progresses.

Or 24h, flight tickets, and a wrench.
No, I can't. I can't prove anything scientifically. That's not how science works. Science doesn't prove anything. Science seeks the best explanations to explain observations. I see no evidence that existence has a purpose, and so the best explanation for that lack of evidence is that there is no purpose. But I can't prove it.
There's no statute of limitations on buying child pornography in my country.
Drugs nobody cares.
Nitter works sometimes depending on which host you hit and when. Nitter.net hasn't worked me all day, but there are others that do. Nitter.cz seems to be working right now.

https://nitter.cz/NASAInSight/status/1590736220199735296#m
I suppose that's a different implementation of the same 'hack' demo'd here, with the encryption carried out by an extension.
I'm guessing you were downtown? From roughly 15th south -- the majority of the city -- pretty much all you get is suburban wasteland of detached homes.
The End of Netflix Password Sharing Is Nigh
This is a conciliation, it's not real. Of course religious beliefs are falsifiable. Religions make falsifiable predictions all the time. Gods live on Mount Olympus? Go meet them. Oh, they're not there? Hypothesis falsified. An angel protects you from harm. You're harmed? Hypothesis falsified. Prayer makes it more likely for a divine force to intercede on someone's behalf. Medical outcomes in a double-blind prayer study do not differ between groups? Hypothesis falsified.

The fact that we have not invented the craft which can travel to heaven, or created the instrument that can detect a djinn, does not mean that those things are not falsifiable from a first principles perspective: they are technological and practical challenges, not philosophical ones.

If you think otherwise, you must think that the definition of religious belief inherently incorporates its non-observability and non-potency: that which cannot be detected and which has no effect. In which case, it's clearly not "real" in any useful sense that you can share with someone else.

It's just that it's such an obnoxious and antagonistic thing to say to people who keep religion, and sometimes to ourselves, so we bend our discourse around it in an effort to preserve peace and avoid saying it directly: a conciliation.
and I'm saying it's not true that it's available to everyone, certainly not in practice.
Show HN: CAD model of the saturn V rocket on the 55th anniversary of Apollo 8
Today is the 55th anniversary of Apollo 8. I figured it would be fun to make a CAD model with a space for a model rocket engine and also as an augmented reality model. The tutorial is for Fusion360 but the steps can be adapted to most CAD programs. I would love to know what you all think!
So, a self-extracting password-protected archive made portable via web browser APIs?
aha, so infinities are not allowed. Fair enough, in that case the gray pixel needs to be filled with one of the colours and the two colours connected to that specific one become interchangeable.
> when a prospective job applicant sends a resume in Pages, it’s a disqualifier

I'm utterly astounded that anyone sends a resume in anything other than PDF.

Sometimes employers require .doc or .docx, and that's a disqualifier. For me.
This got worse in steps, from being banned from some classes to university education and now elementary education.
Just done what each owner would do.
Why is everyone picking on him?
Just look at other companies with mass-layoffs in the last two weeks..
No one is screaming "Bad guy".

Everything become so political these days.. it's his 44 billions and he can do whatever he want with that.
Investing money in SPACs to boost revenue is like peak ZIR environment. Kind of sad to see a lot of net worth obliterated by the higher interest rates, but seeing the deflation of this kind of wasteful enterprise makes up for it a little.
Heh. Reminds of one of Symantec's "Enterprise" products.

Turned out, if you're logged into the central (on prem) server it has the ability to run commands as root/superuser on any of the connected clients (generally servers themselves).

The commands run this way are _not logged_ and don't show up in any system audit logging.

After we pointed this out as a security problem in itself, they released a new version that _apparently_ had this functionality removed (was in the release notes).

But digging into the new release, they'd just moved the functionality into different binaries and hoped no-one would notice. :(

The mind boggles at what some of these places will try.
CyclingAbout has an amazing video on frame stiffness

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5f8PGpKUKro

i guess it makes sense when this article is talking about road bikes, but in MTB and gravel bikes, where geometry is so much more malleable, the geometry plays such a huge role in stiffness, almost independent of material.

you can have a crazy stiff steel bike (e.g. kona honzo esd) or a crazy compliant carbon bike.
1. develop a good professional network.

that's the best F-You skill you can ever have IMO. You want to be in a position where if you get laid off you make a phone call while walking out and have another job that very day.

You can start this as simply as messaging people you work with or use to work with on linkedin.
I was referring to the Stonehenge picture that the grandparent linked to . . .
I’ve been developing since Middle School and got steadily promoted until 2008 when I was laid off during the economic collapse. I applied to dozens of companies and couldn’t get a response, or if I did they said hiring was paused.

So, I started my own web dev company and grew it from myself to 20 full time employees in ~4 years before selling it.

I thought I had FU skills back in 2008 and maybe I did, but it was no match for the macro economic climate.

The fallback might not be another full time job, but instead freelancing or starting your own company.

The thing that helped me the most was building a “FU Network”. Keep in touch with past coworkers and clients and do good work consistently. They were there for me when I needed them most.
Incorrect. You're making an affirmative claim "X can't happen" in spite of mound of evidence to the contrary. You need to explain why you refute say, the origin of species specifically. This is how scientific criticism/refutation actually works, by pointing out specific issues in the reasoning or methods, not by saying "You're wrong".

Let's start with that: Why was Darwin wrong? Take as long as you'd like

Here, if we're going to keep going like this please do me a favor and read here: https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/common-logical-fallacies. You'll at least be better prepared to deal with the counter-trolling you encounter on message boards.
It also could be if you're still using 8266 vs esp32 or if you're on Arduino vs esp-idf. Arduino esp32 is a wrapper on top of the idf so not sure what added things could be slowing the program? Static ip might be even faster! Also, I have it initialized station mode.

I do recall the d1 mini having a really low quiescent current.

Yea the converters can also take up power I separate that and place it on a jig.
> I wasn't being mean, at least re-reading my comment it doesn't seem so to me.

I don't have a dog in this race, but you started your comment with "I bet you don't", which, to me, is unnecessarily combative and/or snarky. Right out of the gate I was predisposed to think ill of whatever you had to say.
I'm not doubting their competence, they're the best of the best IMHO. But sometimes politics and economics overshadows the work.
Agree, it's much more fun to just walk around when you can't really what lies ahead.
Ransomware 'technically is script kiddie domain with today's malware tool-kits. You'll need a bit more supporting evidence to link a particular party than just guesses.
You could if you gave people $400-500k to move over.
AWS Lambda SnapStart makes all these alternative, constrained serverless systems look pretty painful for little gain.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/snapstart.html
Good reputation and a healthy network.

Having the skills to do the technical work is only part of the answer. I've met a lot of brilliant programmers in my career who were not good at following through on commitments, delivering work, working with others, or leaving old workplaces without burning bridges.

On the other hand, I've known a lot of good-but-not-great programmers who were great to work with, made sure they got their work done to good standards, worked hard to overcome skill gaps or looming deadlines when necessary, and left a good impression everywhere they went.

The latter group (good reputation, good communication, good networking) will always have a list of people happy to hire them back. That's what you want.

Also, avoid the trap of thinking that social skills are "bullshit" or other cynical dismissals. Business is more than just writing code and avoiding peers. Results are delivered by teams, not individuals. Knowing how to be a good team member is a crucial skill.