skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
His guests can definitely be really interesting, but I feel like it isn't so much because of him "navigating difficult conversations" and more of "not making them have difficult conversations". He gives them a platform to voice sometimes very questionable viewpoints for hours mostly unchallenged.
> A little Indian brave who before he was ten

> Played war games in the woods with his Indian friends

> And he built a dream that when he grew up

> He would be a fearless warrior, Indian Chief

> Many moons passed, and more the dream grew strong

> Until tomorrow he would sing his first war song

> And fight his first battle

> But something went wrong

> Surprise attack killed him in his sleep that night

> And so castles made of sand
> Melts into the sea eventually

From Jimi Hendrix's Castles Made of Sand, one of his better and more underrated tunes.
I'm surprised to hear UK banks value loyalty. It's certainly not my experience.
I'm sorry you feel this way, and it's easy to become cynical after several failures on that front (I'm assuming) — I know many happily married men with amazing wives who generously allow their husbands to play video games for a reasonable amount of time, and they have children too. It's not universal, but ultimately they found women who respect them.

Another parallel I draw is: many women binge shows on Netflix and Disney+, or binge-read fiction novels, or [insert their own hobbies here] — and they especially have no room to criticize men for playing video games. Heck, many women have taken up playing games too when they find the right genre.

> Yea that is just not going to happen.

I actually dated someone who was quite a homebody herself, but things didn't work out for other reasons, not so much our lifestyles.

If not receiving constant attention counts as being ignored, then I'm not sure what to tell them.
> The last thing I need to is to wonder what no-goodness is going on outside my stoop.

There could be ne'er-do-wells congregating out there. Or, heaven forfend, there could be ruffians!
Being compelled by the state to do something you don't want to do (e.g. provide a service to someone) is what they are objecting to in principle I think, and they see THAT as a potential slippery slope more so than the opposite issue (being unable to pay for services due to societal freeze out).
If you are building for a single target (aka web browser) I agree, it’s very easy to access your ORM with SSR.

But if you plan to support multiple targets (web, mobile, headless) then you have to develop an api anyway so why not use the best front end framework for each of your targets?
Oh, remove and deny entry mean the same thing now?

Listen, if you’re going to be a pedantic law critic, at least be iron clad.
I still use it, but I stopped paying after archiving stopped working and none of my emails were answered anymore.

At that point it fell back to my original perpetual license it seems.

Edit: for those who wonder what it was all about it was a replacement for the social bookmarking service del.icio.us.

Part of the appeal for people like me who were also enthusiastic early WhatsApp adapters was the idea "I/we charge you money and provide a service, thats it, no ads/tracking funny business."
Let me rephrase then: Why is GP working against the interests of everyone who isn't a rich asshole abusing their power? I hope that's clearer.
I love The Wire's version of this with Hamsterdam.
Honestly, it might not be as significant of a problem anymore, because nukes changed the game.

Russia and China, or India and China, will never outright invade each other ever again, because of mutually assured destruction. Only countries without nukes have to worry about their sovereignty being violated, e.g. Ukraine. This also means that the geopolitical Schelling point, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_point_(game_theory), is that every nation state must either 1) have nukes or 2) vassal themselves to a nuclear power, e.g. non nuclear powers in NATO. Again we see an instructive example in Ukraine. They surrendered their nukes after the Soviet Union collapsed for the promise of sovereignty. But promises don't mean anything on the question of sovereignty. Only real world power matters. Might makes right.

But large borders with populous and powerful neighbors still matter, because you still have to commit resources to control those borders to prevent unchecked migration from disrupting your internal economies. The US experiences that problem with Mexico. I imagine a future where India starts experiencing wet bulb temperature events where hundreds of thousands or millions die overnight, which triggers mass migration north. Or perhaps a future where Siberia becomes more temperate and hospitable draws Chinese people try to move north as well.
If you're seriously making that transition, then you should learn one of the two dominant general gaming engines - Unity or Unreal. Both of them have exceptional documentation and can be deployed in a wide variety of platforms.

If you're going from web dev to game devs as a hobby or just fun side thing, then a JS engine like Melon is a good way to dive in and start creating something people can enjoy without serious investment.
It doesn't matter that you're unimaginative, only that not everyone is as unimaginative as you.
I'm looking at an advert in Amiga Format 54 (the Christmas 1993 edition from 29 years ago)... probably the pinnacle of the Amiga's popularity. Here are some sample prices:

Amiga 600 standalone: £194.99

Amiga 1200 standalone: £289.99

20MB HDD £89.99

60MB HDD £179.99

80MB HDD £195.99

120MB HDD £219.99

210MB HDD £359.99

Amiga 600 with 20MB HDD £289.99

Amiga 1200 with 85MB HDD £499.99

Amiga 4000/030 with 120MB HDD £969.99

Amiga 4000/040 with 4MB Fast RAM and 120MB HDD £1699.99

RTC fix: £14.99

Commodore 10884ST monitor (requires interlace for 640x512) £199.99

Commodore 1940 monitor (640x512 without interlacing) £284.99

You can see how the prices add up very quickly and make things unaffordable for the typical family. A business could afford to pay £1300 per computer, but a family likely could not. Most people plugged their machine into their existing TVs, as it seems did you.

If anything, this gives a good example of how technology has beaten inflation. The 20MB HDD is £4.50 per megabyte, or £4.7 million per terabyte. Today you can get a 16TB drive for £215, or £13.44 per terabyte, which is 351,000 times cheaper
I brought my own domain from google services to apple. It's working out okay!
This is just anecdotal evidence vs. anecdotal evidence. Not sure how anyone can remark if this or that "holds up".
The problem with housing as an investment is that there's a limited amount of desirable land and if housing is an investment it quickly becomes unaffordable to buy housing in those areas. If we want to solve the housing affordability crisis we need to stop treating it as an investment that grows in value faster than inflation.
The use case is use J or K is to do advent of code or the Euler project :p

APL is a tool for thought more than a real programming language so in my opinion it's best suited to boost your puzzle solving ability.
Also very telling on those that created it that there isn't a classism section.
https://blog.wallbox.com/how-norway-became-a-global-ev-leade... (Lessons From Norway’s Journey To Becoming The Global Leader In EV Adoption)

https://electrek.co/2021/09/23/norway-bans-gas-cars-in-2025-... (Norway bans gas car sales in 2025, but trends point toward 100% EV sales as early as April 2022)

https://time.com/6133180/norway-electric-vehicles/ (What Norway Can Teach the World About Switching to Electric Vehicles)

(Hybrids are counted in Norway’s electric vehicle stats, but are less than 10% of new vehicle sales)
> HN, like the American tech industry in general, is almost certainly more diverse than the Stanford administration and faculty.

The point I was trying to make was that HN has some very real and very wide ideological blindspots. It's true what you say that there are many viewpoints here on HN, but they aren't all uniformly represented. That said, the commentariat here is also self selected, so not necessarily representative of the general population.

> By contrast, diversity at Stanford, especially among faculty, is carefully curated by the overwhelmingly white faculty.

That may be true, but at the same time there are more stakeholders who have input into initiatives like these.

> But the white Stanford faculty wouldn’t hire those immigrants into the cultural studies department of the university. You’re much more likely to get a job at Stanford by writing papers on how colonial terms “cause harm.”

Do you have evidence that such people didn't have input or their input wasn't allowed? Or are you just speculating to make a point? You seem fixated on white Stanford faculty, but it's not clear that the linked list is even a product of the faculty, it seems like it's a product of a committee of the IT department. It seems to me like you just have some ideological things to say about Stanford faculty without really addressing the facts on the ground re: this list.
Ironically, APL has won as a programming language. Look at the SIMD instruction set - it's APL!
Auto updating is only one of the multiple problems Snaps create. Read the other comments here to see many of them.

I can't wait for Snaps to crash, burn and die.
Again, I’m not arguing laws in this branch of the thread.

I’m just saying people who lean on “the law is this, they are in the right” ignore a major part of society and commerce to their own detriment.
Fascinating that High Performance Computers had export controls in the 90s as dual use technology but little restraint until recently.

How would we apply this today? Instead of MTOPS use TFLOPS FP16?
People don't vote on representatives. People (en masse) vote along party lines or on name/ideology recognition.

It has been well noted that this reduces to advertising budget, which lays bare the farce that is democracy. If it weren't a direct mapping from
money to power, we wouldn't need campaign finance laws.

You can't change this because this is the way the system was designed to work. It is a system for legitimizing the authority of those with money and power using the branding of "the will of the people".

Funny how the people's will always lines up with the interests of the largest corporations, employers, and landowners, despite their being a tiny minority of "the people".
here, hear it from a linguist

https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=57262#comments
Figuring out a way to circumvent the rules was the reason for the F1 car being fascinating, and successful. It being a competition involving building the fastest car confirming to the prescribed Formula.
its gotten too much love <3

```
ServerBusyEgress is over the account limit. RequestId:ce64eac5-e01e-0071-6897-14c44e000000 Time:2022-12-20T17:22:50.8918472Z
```
I am very happy with what we got, as I wrote in another comment. I still find it strange that the author would go out of his way to write the article, produce screenshots, write multiple times how it's hard to explain or show without an animation, yet not record one.

Asking whether I'm willing to provide my own gif isn't quite a fair measure. The author has the code running and he himself commented on the need for moving pictures. I have partial code and no personal investment in this.

I have however written a few articles about stuff I've done for my own work and wherever it seemed relevant I've taken the time to produce and include video. That's been a lot less effort than writing the text, even when it's required a number of changes in the scenes and code.
It looks like you have to tie it to your stripe account so you (the seller) would be
I think they are entirely over used whatever one chooses to call them, but these don't mean the same thing at all. Content note could mean anything. For people with PTSD though, for whom psychological triggering is a real thing (not just something they don't like), a "trigger warning" means something pretty specific (or at least, it did before it became overused).
It doesn't make sense without vaccines. Unfortunately the Chinese had low vaccine adoption and a less effective one apparently.
> Having personal space and a place to live is a human right, must be provided from birth.

That's the point of the article... If housing is an investment it is necessarily unaffordable for newcomers. If we want everyone to be able to afford housing its value can't increase faster than inflation.
> people that are...

Well that is my point.

> ...claim to be, or are assumed by anyone else

Gotta disagree there, in 2021 the self-identified breakdown was:

60.6% Democrat,
21.6% Independent,
9.1% Socialist,
4.9% Republican,
3.8% Other

(https://drive.google.com/file/d/16r96A47pFcXQF2Z2Ei7ZvoXyBe8...)
My very first programming experience was with APL\360, using a time share IBM terminal with the APL type ball. We wrote code in a Geodetic Sciences class to compute Least Squares solutions to survey networks. I really liked APL...
Show me on the Ticketmaster website where the TOS is shown before purchase.
Here is an article that goes through triangle rasterizing in detail, with explainations of subpixel precision - along with animations that show the quality improvement.

https://kristoffer-dyrkorn.github.io/triangle-rasterizer/
The adjacent submission https://tafc.space/qna/the-topologists-world-map/ would be an example use case, for selling the digital version of their map.
I loved milk but it didn't counteract Italian genes, I'm 5 foot 6 which is fortunately normal in my country (Uruguay) but would be short-ish in the USA.
The Golden Age of Cocaine Is Happening
> I've never had a website outright reject certain special characters,

This is exceedingly common for US Banks. You'll find, usually only after pasting in the newly generated random password and clicking submit, that the "your password must include at least one number and two special characters" description up front failed to also include: "oh, also, we do not allow use of the character % in your password" (or some other character).
Vercel makes it easier to collaborate on preview deployments
Presuming by “Ruby” you meant Rails, you probably won’t find WordPress a satisfactory replacement for any of them if you’re more of a developer than a site-builder. As a web development framework, WordPress is nearly useless computers to the others.
I am not sure why you would say that she has no case. On the one hand, it's a common understanding that businesses can bar anyone from their premises for any reason, and that would be the normal interpretation of this issue, but in this circumstance, the lawyer does have a legitimate response in that they have agreed to waive that authority in exchange for the permission to serve alcohol on premises.

On the other hand, they sold her a ticket to a show and then unilaterally voided that ticket without warning based on something that had only the smallest connection to her, which could be considered retaliation against the law firm that is handling the case.

There isn't any doubt about the facts of the case, the only question is how will a judge and jury allocate fault and responsibility.

That's a really good case for any competent lawyer and I'm pretty sure their legal team is not very happy right now.
I disagree it is that clear-cut (including GP's inversion). Access to credit is essential to businesses and governments (and individuals).
You could have launched a lawsuit claim damages.
Trojanized Windows 10 installers compromised the Ukrainian government
I think your point (1) doesn't really match with what the rails devs expect.

37Signals have both their Basecamp and Hey.com products which act very much like a single page app but only using Turbo and Stimulus.

I think the rails devs believe that single page apps are overused and the majority of functionality can be done using just the provided tools.
> Absolutely no one will take this seriously

In Canada, the professional regulators who control whether you're allowed to to call yourself an engineer and whether your company is allowed to do engineering, are also making this kind of thing mandatory. They are considering it a part of workplace safety, akin to preventing oil spills and lethal accidents: an engineer's top priority, lest they lose their license.
You’re focusing on a single word in a sentence which was just about the format.
Complaints about paywalls are offtopic (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html)
That's an argument to observe prosperity happen, not to ignore failure to raise a generation of workers nor to ignore that people see reasons to leave their countries.
There are random commenters (like me!) saying various things all the time. But there is kind of the weight of the mass of commenters. That's how we got to the semi-consensus (except for the crypto partisans) that web3/crypto seemed to be in a massive bubble with no clear use case and lots of likely fraud. Notice that for the AI boom going on right now this is not going the same was way as web3.
Yep. That's the current narrative. Well done.

Jim Crow laws were passed and enforced by the government. There are countless examples of businesses having no choice but to discriminate because government told them to.

The government itself determined that segregation was A-OK as long as things were "separate but equal."
I think you missed the part where I mentioned that it's not really meant to be a bargain, the bargain is the screen. The "luxury stand" is purely a fashion accessory, because anyone who would actually buy the stand is not buying the screen for it's intended purpose (or at least from the target demographic).

It's like buying one of those artic polar watches that can go to 150M that's gold plated.

The gold plating is not helping you in that situation, whoever is buying the gold plated edition of that watch is buying it as a fashion accessory, not as an expedition watch.

If they want to part with their money: let them.
Over 67,000 DraftKings Betting Accounts Hit by Hackers
Coming soon for FTX, Celsius, 3AC...
they are banning them because they have already caused trouble in similar situation. This is very different, she is being banned even though there is no indication that she would be security threat.
We did make some API changes that would make it easier for a third party to create a plugin like Canvas. But there was nothing changed in the core solely to support Canvas.

There were two under-the-hood changes required to properly facilitate Canvas:

1. Redoing "embeds." We decided it was important for cards to work the same way our inline embeds work. So we rewrote the embed system to be properly extensible and useable by plugins. Canvas is leveraging the same system that powers ![[embeds]]

2. Untangling our editor. Previously, editors were a construct constrained to a markdown view in Obsidian. We've also done some refactoring so that a "editor" can be used anywhere, and doesn't need to be backed by a file. We see this a another big win for plugins that want to build their own editing experience

We want to keep pushing what third party plugins can do on top of Obsidian, so implementing a feature like Canvas forces us to find the limitations that exist in the API.

The question of whether Obsidian will ever be "done" is a tough one because operating systems and user expectations are a shifting landscape. Our intention is that the writing and thinking you do inside of Obsidian can be future-proof for decades, even if Obsidian itself is no longer relevant. That's why we're focused on portable formats like Markdown. However we cannot know how operating systems will change, and what will be required for Obsidian to continue working well on macOS 30 or Windows 20. Similarly, we can't close ourself off to new UI paradigms like Canvas that open up new thinking modalities our users are asking for. We hope that the modular and flexible architecture of the app allows it to remain very performant regardless of what plugins a user has turned on.
Thank you for sharing more. I don't take Last Week Tonight as a thorough even-handed presentation of ideas, but more as a spotlight, trying to point attention at some ongoing problems in today's world.

I think the representativeness is the most important aspect to think about -- most likely the show focuses on and exaggerates absurdities / hypocrisies that are happening for a bigger punch, and as you point out, at the cost of its own credibility.

I know quite little on the subject we've been discussing - and I got more clarity reading what you wrote and thinking about it.

Stay awesome!
It's worth some thought because, while we deal with technology, we also live in a society. That society is currently going through a bout of insanity. It affects us. It's like a fish living in polluted water. You don't care about factories on land, because you're a fish. Except, when they pollute the water you live in, you do care.

And Stanford has a certain amount of cachet, or influence, or reach, or whatever, even into tech circles and tech companies. So this nonsense may be coming soon to the company you or I work at. So, yeah, we care. We take it seriously, because it impacts us.
RapidSlide Adjustable Wrench
What lawsuits are you talking about?

Cloanto never sued anyone, other than having been dragged in the case of lawyer-owned Hyperion Entertainment. Hyperion is owned by a litigator who is well known for his tactics in his home country of Belgium. When Hyperion failed to deliver on their 2001 Amiga OS outsourced development contract, they did what lawyers do best: they sued Amiga. They sued Amiga once in 2007, and they sued Amiga again in 2018 (case number 2:2018cv00381 filed March 13, 2018). This was completely unprovoked, and was largely seen as an attempt to trigger a "catch all" clause in the 2009 settlement with Amiga. Hyperion was hoping for Amiga to default. Instead, Cloanto helped them, as they always did.

If you want to educate yourselved on the Hyperion vs. Amiga case, "Amiga Documents" is as good as it gets:

https://twitter.com/amigadocuments

https://sites.google.com/site/amigadocuments/
> It's easy and rises code quality

Absolutely not. This leads to testing being invasive and driving the design of your software, usually at the cost of something else (like readability). Testing is a tool, you can't let it turn into a goal.