skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
How often do you have emacs hanging because TRAMP is completing some network operation, for example? I’m a big emacs fan, have been using it since the 90s, and will likely never move away. But there’s no reason to pretend that it doesn’t have warts.
A vector for child sexual abuse material, two-day processing time for complaints
As I said to the other comment or, you can also pay for therapy. Which maybe Elon is already getting, I don't speculate about his private life.

I was responding to a comment which I agreed with except in their in my opinion overly sympathetic portrayal of a rich and powerful person who has all the capability to take personal responsibility for his mental health - making any humanising or "give him a break" rhetoric, no matter how earnest, also a part of a tradition of deflection and distraction from the debate on how to make sure no flawed human has that much power without just creating an authoritarian nanny state
I'm not sure it's fair to say it failed. Not everything is forever. It served very important purposes, helped push technology forward and paved the way for editors like VSCode.

I'd call that success.
Go and Proxy Servers: Part 3 – Socks Proxies
ahh... I forgot Turkey has a dysfunctional opposition party. I sometimes, wonder, perhaps with an opposition like that, this is what they deserve...
Feature Focus with Microsoft MVPs: S6-E5
There are some photos of what it looked like here https://www.uniqhotels.com/radisson-blu-berlin
I think that Musk is lying again and using his children as an excuse, he just doesn't want to be followed next time he goes to current mistress.
One of the hypothesis Matt Levine posits in Money Stuff today [1] is that Tesla is branded as liberal tech, and Elon is engaging in Q-foolery to bring in more right leaning people: "the only car free from the woke mind virus". I don't know how much I believe this theory, but definitely interesting.

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-12-15/the-se...
> Owning a Tesla was a source of pride and is now a mark of shame and mockery.

This is so true. Why sabotage your main user base? Owning Tesla is similar to staying in trump tower. I am really waiting for tesla sales numbers in liberal states like California and NY.
Checking for the absence of a string, naive AVX-512 edition
Thank you for your comment!

Handling the DAG architecture in a batched system is exactly what airflow does. Do this, wait here, when it is done do that. So the DAG acronym is entirely appropriate for this discussion.

And you can have tasks in Airflow that send out mails, quarterly that depends on the quarterly summary to be executed.

So my idea here is to

- Ingest all raw data into e.g. BigQuery.
- Combine it the way you want with SQL
- Add tables with email addresses etc for customer adaptations along with parameters
- Join with those table to create custom adaptations.
- Add output layer stuff (email, upload to custom file system etc).

Now you have one place and one language for your logic. Given that this part of the system is inherently batched that is. If it is real time/streaming it will not work.

The "can't do the fuzzy parts with strings and files and system communications" needs to be defined. This is the rot in the system, the ghost in the closet that everyone is afraid of approaching.
> The buyers of Tesla are, by and large, rich liberals who care about the climate.

Or at least, want to pretend that they care, considering Tesla makes most of its money selling carbon credits to other companies so that they can pollute more. Buying a Tesla doesn't cause less emissions.
These will be full replacements in no time, give or take 10 years.
The first always-encrypted Kubernetes engine by Edgeless Systems
My Ford Fiesta has windscreen heating. IIRC the patent is owned by Ford but I could be wrong.
Yeah it's dumb but what're you gonna do? Technology evolves and the way this industry works is you gotta keep up. Can't keep computing like we're still on mainframes writing Cobol.
> When your apps live as a service on the network or as a nicely isolated module in your repo, you no longer have a reason to over-engineer them. You don't need a grandiose architecture that solves every problem, instead you can make local decisions that are good enough in the specific context.

Totally agree yeah, it's a huge boon to engineers to focus on their tickets rather than to have to constantly consider application architecture. I think as long as a framework exists (either an off the shelf one like Django or even--shudder--an in-house one) you get this benefit.

My problem (and maybe we agree here too) comes from the dynamic where the team decides on SOA, and embarks on this saga of implementing the "framework" themselves. That's a big loss in productivity as now you have 2 software projects: your framework and your business app.

> That's the argument in favor of SOA, isn't it?

Eh, not really. I don't think anyone disputes that big apps should be multiple services. SOA/DDD/Hex/etc. aren't novel for suggesting that, their novel claim is that you can tame the complexity of an enormous service by rigidly adhering to their principles when structuring and implementing it. My counterargument is that it's simpler and easier to split services before they become enormous.
> Watching Elon melt down in real time while pissing away $44 billion dollars is not something I ever expected. That it is happening is a testament to the notion that wealth is not bequeathed upon the "worthy" so much as it is the "lucky."

If anything, another example of how a decent tech/engineer may not be the best spokesperson or decision maker.
Well Elon still isn’t anything to do with the apparatus of gdpr enforcement so it’s still irrelevant and secondly enforcement would be against the sites which are supposedly infringing rather than people linking to them on twitter. This is a sideshow.
Wasn't there a similar yearly anthology of bad lines/paragraphs from actual novels/stories? I am pretty sure such a thing existed but couldn't find it anywhere.
some good stuff here I guess but am kind of skeptical of the whole "you can be super-competent or super-pleasant" thing - not vouching for rudeness and people need to be professional but competency is a lot more important than being pleasant
How is this supposed to work? There’s an awful lot to exploit in Ireland or the US and pretty much nothing in Cuba, even less in Haiti. In between in Vietnam, Thailand or China. Is your model that the Irish/US elites are more benevolent and Vietnamese ones less?
I tried the same thing.
The performance is a LOT better using Parsec, it's free for personal use
The more metrics you track, the less you know
10 years‽ StableDiffusion was released August 22nd of this year!
It’s also supported out of the box in SublimeText, though probably not as extensive as VSCode. Code completion, for example, is more like guessing in SublimeText. Though I can’t imagine either emacs or VSCode to respond as quickly to input as SublimeText, which is one of the reasons it will remain the text editor of choice for me. At least when writing some code in Lua.
Selfish Writing (2018)
> Platform conventions matter because uniformity matters

Except just as you noted the conventions change across platforms, contexts and over time, so they aren't really uniform at all.

If you're moving between Windows, macOS, and Linux, or between GUI, command line and remote shell (either within or across any of these) you're already context switching on a regular basis. And if you stick around long enough an OS upgrade will come along that moves the window controls and menu buttons around so you need to retrain your muscle memory (and update your end-user documentation).

If anything some of the long-established, old-school conventions are probably _more_ uniform and consistent. E.g. in vi/vim `:w` will save and `:n` will jump to line n - always and everywhere. In a terminal `find . -name foo` will search the filesystem - (almost) always and everywhere.

That sort of thing isn't comprehensive (i.e. it doesn't cover action you'll need to take) but it's kinda nice when it's available. Maybe we'd be better off if select-then-middle-click worked for copy/paste everywhere.
How to Improve Your Creative Thinking
Try ‘Riffusion,’ an AI model that composes music by visualizing it
Work and studies of metal films and thin films as well as their fabrication has been going on for more than a century.
Basically since electromagnetism is popular.

Fabrication tools for thin films have improved a lot over the past decades though. We can now fabricate exotic structured matter at the nanoscale that doesn't respond as the bulk counterpart.
I'm betting on 'someone threw some Ninja Rocks at it'[1]

[1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja_rocks
What Winning in SaaS Looks Like in 2023
I wonder is there is something similar to the expert system powerloom in python. I hope you get some inspiration from ARIMA (Norvig Book with python code). Also using ontologies with triples in python should be slow for inference.
And they'd never have been able to do that without winning the water wars with the Central Valley ..... instead you get almond milk
assuming the first sample was generated by OP method, how did you clean that sample up so nicely?
Self-deception: maybe why you're still grey after practicing every day
Sure they do. You get Tesla solar panels for your house and a Tesla Powerwall as well and then you can charge your Tesla car from the setup.
Downvoted for a question, people these days...
That was option 1, and it was voted out for being unneccessarily verbose.
It's not just "not perfect"...it's pretty much useless as a signal of quality.

Certainly, it doesn't come close to the level of credibility that you've attributed to it (i.e. papers without peer review are somehow "blog posts").

> What alternative is there that doesn’t have something resembling peer review, isn’t curated by third parties, doesn’t suffer from confirmation bias/groupthink, and doesn’t leave it up to authors to sift through 100s of papers of unknown quality a day to learn about what’s going on in the field?

There's no free lunch. Nobody serious in any scientific field relies on peer review to determine paper quality. You have to read the paper in front of you and use your experience, which means you must read not just "100s of papers", but literally THOUSANDS of papers, in order to have any reasonable chance of being a credible evaluator.

If you don't have this experience, you can't know the quality of a piece of scientific literature. That's just how it is.
If what this gentleman is writing is what he believes, I don't understand the principle which allows him to isolate Twitter in particular.
As someone who has written a lot of Haskell in the past I would love to take a closer look at Lean (as a functional programming language rather than as a proof assistant) but the documentation and information on that end seems very poor.

There's the manual [1] and "Functional programming in lean" [2] and they enabled me to get programming with it and solving some basic puzzles, but they are both WIP and unfinished.

I would love to explore Lean 4 more but with the current situation it's a bit too time consuming. Hope there will be more in the future.

[1]: https://leanprover.github.io/lean4/doc/

[2]: https://leanprover.github.io/functional_programming_in_lean/
https://archive.is/r05hh
F-35 fighter jet pilot ejected after attempted landing
I'd credit Sublime Text with that.
I get that you can do it using FreeRDP, but why??

This should be done via MiraCast.
And then the same system would be compatible with smart tvs, smartphones, Samsung Dex and Windows.

For Linux the project implementing the protocol is called MiracleCast. There is a GTK Gui to send your screen. But there is no GUI to receive a screen.

Unfortunately this gets little love.

Also, to my understanding, Wayland is still not ready for such a use case.
Well, this is somewhat circular but I think you’re making a genuine point that doesn’t apply in my case.

I was following the other way around… people are dismissing Musk as a whole and turning this into a binary debate, so I felt the need to point out that Musk’s achievements aren’t really disputable, so it’s silly to treat this as a binary debate.

It can be “yeah musk has done stupid things and brilliant things” but not “musk has done stupid things and anyone who defends him is a fanboy and what he has achieved positively is now moot.” And the post I was replying to, and indeed much of the debate, takes that form.

And y’know personally that really bothers me. Casting people as goodies or baddies just really gets to me for some reason. I don’t know why, it’s just really irrational behaviour that I can’t tolerate very well.
astroturfed by who?
What do you recommend over VSCode for real work?
I don't think it's difficult to become inflammatory when people are twisting themselves into pretzels trying to paint what Twitter/Elon did as justified. You're not arguing in good faith and I see that as far more harmful for HN.
Men are XY
Cracks in glass travel so fast a regular CCTV camera won't be able to see where the break first happened.
Will you mention all the bad about Elon in a post about SpaceX achivements? I guess not, from your post. So no need to mention the merits of the companies he owns in a post about his absurd behavior.

Though in my opinion you assign way too much credit to a CEO of three companies that apparently spends most of his time on social media and being offended.
Most of HN doesn't really get the games industry anyway.
> So if I read right, you think being a billionaire is unethical.

I did not intend to say this in my post. I said that a billionaire's capacity for harm is greater than that of other people, so it is worse to be a hypocrite. But I also do believe that simply having a billion dollars is unethical as well, or at the very least antisocial.

> Say you’re right, how do we prevent people being billionaires?

This is hard. But I do not believe that "enforcing a policy that prevents billionaires is hard" is a reason for believing that being a billionaire is pro-social behavior. It would be both difficult and probably unwise to create a policy that punished people for cheating on their spouse or (less seriously) flaking on a social engagement without notice. But I think it is thoroughly reasonable to still say that those things are unethical.

I think that the challenges of policy preventing billionaires are largely related to enforcement and management of illiquid assets. I do not think that such a policy would disincentivize entrepreneurs. I believe that few entrepreneurs get into the business for the purpose of becoming a billionaire. Ending up with 900M is not going to cause anybody any tears. And if it is the case that such a policy disincentivizes entrepreneurship, then it sure as hell proves that the claimed incentives like personal satisfaction, self determination, job creation, and providing value to customers are all bullshit.
The main complaints against OpenAI have been it's lack of openness and betrayal of it's claimed founding principles.

In that context "open sourcing many useful projects" seems the bare minimum it should be doing, because that was the promise still enshrined in it's name - this is not a bog-standard commercial organisation where that would not be expected.

To be clear OpenAI does deserve massive kudos for it's achievements but openness is not among them.
Fediverse announcement: https://floss.social/@forgejo/109519186453892972

> We're excited to announce the official launch of the #Forgejo project, a community-driven fork of #Gitea under the stewardship of @Codeberg. Check out https://forgejo.org/2022-12-15-hello-forgejo/ to learn more, including the motivation for the fork, as well as Codeberg's announcement at https://blog.codeberg.org/codeberg-launches-forgejo.html Come and get involved at https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo or in our Matrix room https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-chat:matrix.org . We aim to be a fully inclusive community and everyone's participation is welcomed.
If I were to do it myself I would have a look at Algo from Trail of Bits: https://github.com/trailofbits/algo
I challenge you to find a sentence or paragraph from either author like these. Please cite the relevant book.
Summarizing, both Unity and Unreal are damaging themselves with unsettling strategies and strategic partners, and if the trend continues other game engines, such as Godot, will replace them.

It's the circle of life, not an "inflection point".
A Sign That Tuition Is Too High: Some Colleges Are Slashing It in Half
youtube lets you advertise other video platforms and always has, what are you talking about?
In order to make an informed choice, I would recommend reading this first: https://gist.github.com/joepie91/5a9909939e6ce7d09e29

With that said, if I were to use a VPN, I would go with Mullvad.
Wild Rift and Legends of Runeterra are Unity and Valorant is Unreal, so Riot sort of doesn't have their own engine since it's just used by LoL.
In 2022, I would strongly recommend a solution based on WireGuard.
>I think calling anyone defending Musk at any level a “cheerleader” isn’t a helpful framing of the debate.

I generally agree with you POV (people are complicated). I don't think the parent was calling people people cheerleaders merely for defending him on any level.

But to add to your comment. I never understand why people are surprised that a person driven, opinionated and cutthroat enough to be a successful business person is a bit of an arsehole in person. It kind of goes with the territory.
I wouldn't put it that blunt but I do agree. The problem are these nerds with seemingly infinite memory. It is almost impossible for them to make a UI for the rest of us.

I tried editing a txt document in vim one time. After gazing at the UI for much to long I had to ask for help because it wouldn't let me edit the txt.

I'm sure your average vim wizard can see no wrong in forcing new users to learn how to engage edit mode by pressing 12 keys simultaneously.

They simply dont get that our brains are like bookshelves that take only n books. If you push more than that onto the shelve other books are falling off on the other side.

I could certainly learn some of vim's functionality but there would be very little disk space left to write the software. I'm seriously more productive using MS notepad or nano. I can totally see myself forget how to engage edit mode in a week or 2. I'm having visuals of picard ordering enterprise to engage

All i need is a shuttle!

The edit mode feels like a child safety feature where I'm the child.

Human children flying Vulkan space ships, think about it.

If non of this makes sense, that is the whole point.
Awesome app! Going to dive in and explore a bit more later when I have some time. Can you comment on any portals or forums in which requests for features can be made?

TLDR: do you have plans for an interface to implement your own interactions like in VSCode/Emacs/Vimscript?

I’ve got a to-do item to implement a software artifact that’s hyper-specific to the keyboard configuration I like when it comes to reading, but this app has so many nice features that I can’t help but wonder if I can fit it to my functionality. I’m a big tweaker when it comes to personal software interaction configuration, and I’m curious if your app has any functionality through which to tweak interactions.

An example of something I’ve always wanted: find the first currently visible paragraph break and move the top line of the immediately following paragraph to the top of the view window (similarly, find the last visible paragraph break, and move the last line of the previous paragraph to the bottom of the viewing window). I have lots of little micro-configurations that I hope to implement, and I’m wondering if there’s a route to bring this functionality to your app. Little things like this help to micro-optimize intensive research sessions. Happy to contribute if it’s that sort of project.

The previously-mentioned interactions could be extended to only apply to a single monitor if the window is sized over multiple monitors. I have lots of ideas, and would love to discuss the prospects of accepting community requests and feedback concerning these sorts of personal settings.
The thing I was going to mention is the Linux compatibility layer. It's great.
While a lot of practical jokes are, it's for sure possible to do practical jokes that I'd file under harmless fun. The tv program Just for laughs is --somewhat surprisingly-- really good at this. Excuse the awful laugh track and jaunty music, but a good example is how they turned an air horn prank into something fairly harmless: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mb2VZ6lp8f0
Have your seen interest rates? Everyone's numbers are going to be out of whack, trying to read what liberals think about buying Teslas from that is some fine tea leaf reading.
>>With VSCode, you type the name of any programming language in the extension search, click "Install", and you have a world-class development environment

> Very minor feature. It is not usefull unless you are constantly hunting for new languages.

The big advantage isn't just installing but keeping them up to date without any actual effort. I used to know vimscript, used to understand how the vim package managers I used works and all. With VSCode I don't even know in which language are extenssions written.

I work mostly on golang, and now the environment is certainly more stable, but I remember that in order to have go extensions working on vim I used to have to be updating manually the extensions pretty much every release and it was some effort. Now I update the golang version and things just work.
https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/pg_ivm-10-released-244...
Phone verification is 1-factor in most implementations on every popular website. It's just that the factor is now your phone, and your password can be changed with your phone number. Your password might as well not exist. The problem with phone verification is that phones are less secure than passwords. This isn't even a 1 factor vs 2 factor discussion. Again, Phone verification is 1 factor.

To be more specific, if the implementation of 2 factors requires both factors, then it is indeed more secure. If it's a form of 2 factor that requires only one factor, it's less secure, because now you have more attack surface.
The Codeberg blog post has been submitted here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34011581
@donieosullivan@mastodon.ie

Aaron, Ryan, Matt & Keith don't seem to have any (yet?)
what use case? Miracast, or TFA use-case? Under sway, it's very easy to:

* add a virtual screen of specified resolution (The command is `swaymsg create_output`, then adjust its position and resolution if the default 1080p on the right are not to your liking)

* start a vnc server for that screen (`wayvnc -o HEADLESS-1`)

* start a vnc client on the laptop

Regarding screencast, xdg portals and pipewire streams are a thing (including zero-copy DMA-BUF access, and hardware encoding).
I agree that supply chain is a risk but I think you are creating a false dichotomy.

There is nothing stopping us from having a small standard library and a set of official - but optional - crates for common things like regex. This is the best of both worlds in my view.
Can't imagine the fate of all the fish, what a tragedy.
most of what you say is spot on, but lets be clear:

twitter has never nor would it have ever been "a public town square"

anything owned by a private company is the literal opposite of a "public" anything.

and way more importantly, anything with a character limit of 280 characters is absolutely thoroughly inadequate to discuss the most complicated and nuanced subjects that philosophers have been wrestling with for centuries with entire tomes and libraries worth of space.
> If we did such a think, do you think it would disincentivise entrepreneurs?

How do you think people's internal motivation systems work? I don't think anyone in history ever though "oh golly I can only make up to $999 million in my life, what a bother, guess there is no point in working hard".