skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Several mechanisms. For one, a show running to long simply squeezes all the juice out of the premise. Popular shows are kept running too long to extract all the money out of them, but they become soulless and formulaic towards the end.

Another mechanism is flanderization, in which writers simplify characters or other aspects of the show for various reasons, mostly laziness and to conform to expectations the audience develops about how characters should act. Characters with depth become shallow shadows of their past selves as one aspect of their personality starts to dominate the others. When characters are driven by audience expectations instead of the writer's internal muse, they become soulless and predictable.

Another is overdeveloping the setting. Throwaway lines in earlier media get needlessly turned into developed storylines. It leaves less to the imagination. This is often related to the first mechanism I mention; the writers squeezing all the juice out of the earlier media.
Some cellular partners in some states don't support it even though its a federal program.
DuckDB is also great for stuff like this. You can replace a MapReduce cluster with a single SQL.
We just added YouTube to my son’s iPad. In addition to a daily time limit we also locked his account down so he can only see videos that we explicitly add to his account.
To my ear (native English speaker) it sounds like: for j o
Show HN: Streamed ChatGPT Responses in VSCode
Hey, HN. I spent the past couple days hacking together a VSCode extension that puts ChatGPT in your IDE. Maybe some of you will find it interesting to play with. I had the idea when I was using ChatGPT's web app during PR reviews, and it was really helpful for reviewing code in unfamiliar languages.

There are a couple alternatives, but they either require you to manually extract cookies from your browser's dev tools and copy them into the extensions settings, or they don't stream responses (meaning you have to wait awhile before you hear back).

I'm planning on putting up a blog post describing how I went about building this, but the hardest parts were reverse-engineering the API and figuring out how to get browser-based authentication working in the extension (since OpenAI put ChatGPT behind Cloudflare, which blocks programmatic auth requests).

I haven't pushed up the code to a hosted repo, but if anyone's interested in me open sourcing the code (or contributing), I can be found in the project's discord: (linked in the extension's README).
Clickhouse is not in memory.
The arguments around this are always weak and spurious. I've been at this too long to take the bait from any trolls who 'have it all figured out.'

By no measure or justification is splitting the atom a good idea. There are few things more short sighted than arguing we should figure out what to do with nuclear waste because we haven't quite nailed solutions with ZERO waste.

People who minimize the significance of both nuclear waste and absolutely inevitable nuclear disasters just aren't thinking with any foresight or vision about the core concepts of sustainability.

But then that's it. A lot of people advancing Nuclear power aren't environmentalists at all. Learned that the hard way.

No nukes!
when I got my own PC in my bedroom (with Ethernet!) as a middle-schooler around 2004, sure, there was plenty of online games and game development forums and porn and whatever else to occupy my attention… but I had no way of taking any of it with me on the go, easily-accessible wherever I am.

this is the basis of my fears for introducing the children I will be having (in the next few years) to the new Internet: it's a pervasive lifestyle change. modern social media apps (instagram, tiktok) are nothing short of digital drugs that you never run out of. why do x y and z in the real world when you could just pull your phone out of your pocket, swipe your finger across its screen a few times, and instantly obtain infinite entertainment that is infinitely more engaging than anything else you could possibly do with your time?

the real challenge in my opinion is to instill the dangers of these sorts of things upon one's children in such a way that despite peer pressure—including the ambient peer pressure of everyone out in public staring idly at their phones—they come to see these dangerous digital drugs as what they are, without having to partake in order to "find out for themselves."

and of course, this all has to be done without accidentally causing the classic "well my family banned this in our house but now that I'm on my own I'm going to binge as much of this shit as possible" conundrum. which I was definitely guilty of myself as a young person whose family highly restricted access to video games for most of my childhood… turns out that's a great way to get a kid to end up becoming a game developer lol
https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bont... ?
Makes sense, but are they going to incentivise distributed batteries now?
> Anytime money changes hands the government gets its vig.

And doesn't that create an artificial pressure for money to change hands fewer times (for example, in the production of a consumer good)?
I googled a bit, and [1] shows that:
Here are all the current models without soldered RAM:
• E14 / E15 Gen 2 (1x SO-DIMM, Intel only)
• L14 / L15 Gen 2 (2x SO-DIMM)
• T15p / P15v Gen 2 (2x SO-DIMM)
• X1 Extreme / P1 Gen 3 (2x SO-DIMM)
• P15 / T15g / P17 Gen 1 (4x SO-DIMM)
All other models have completely or partially soldered RAM. Partially soldered are:
• T14 / T15 Gen 2 (1x SO-DIMM, 8 to 16 GB on-board)
• P14s / P15s Gen 2 (1x SO-DIMM, 8 to 16 GB on-board)
• E14 / E15 Gen 2 (1x SO-DIMM, 8 GB on-board, AMD only)

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/thinkpad/comments/md59tv/newer_thin...
That is already doable with xargs itself

xargs -P maxprocs

Parallel mode: run at most maxprocs invocations of utility at once. If maxprocs is set to 0, xargs will run as many processes as possible.
Depends. If it's services, I could see where the services are delivered from (e.g. location of platform or service personnel), OR where the services are destined for (client location) and commit the rev-rec there.
You avoid as long as you can; not exactly rocket-science.
I strongly disagree.

Humans have perceptual systems we can never fully understand for the same reasons no mathematical system can ever be provably consistent and complete. We cannot prove the reliability and accuracy of our perception with our perception.

The only thing which suggests the reliability of our perception is our existence. The better ways of perceiving make a better map of reality that makes persistence more likely. Our ability to manipulate reality and achieve desired outcomes is what distinguishes good perception from bad perception.

If data directed by human perception is fed into these systems, they have an amazing ability to condense and organize accurate/good faith but relatively unstructured knowledge that is entered into them. They are and will remain extremely useful because of that ability.

But they do not have access to reality because they have not been grown from it through evolution. That means that fundamentally they have no error correcting beyond human input. As systems become increasingly unintelligible due to increasing the scale of the data, these systems are going to become more and more disconnected from reality, and less accurate.

Think of how nearly every financial disaster occurs despite increasingly sophisticated economic models that build off of more and more data. As you get more and more abstraction needed to handle more and more data, you get more and more error.

There is a reason biological systems tap out at a certain size, large organizations decay over time, most animals reproduce instead of live forever. Errors in large complex systems are what nature has been fighting for billions of years, and tend to compound in subtle and pernicious ways.

Imagine a world in which AI systems are not fed carefully categorized human data, but are operating in an internet in which 5% is AI data. Then 15%. Then 50%. Then 75%. Then what human data there is gets influenced by AI content and humans doubting reality based categorizations because of social pressure/because AI is perceived to be better. Very soon you get self referential systems of AI data feeding AI and further and further distance from original source perception and categorization. Self referential group think is disastrous enough when only humans are involved. If you add machines which you cannot appeal to and are entirely deferential to statistical majorities, which then become even more entrenched self referential statistical majorities, you very quickly become entirely disconnected from any notion of reality.
I want to be clear that I still find it impressive, in the same way I find Riffusion impressive. If anything, I'm looking at Norvig's pointing out that "the biggest issue is that there is no explanation of why the code is the way it is, no justification for how it works." The model can't and won't; it's an unreasonable expectation, and I can't tell whether Norvig is asking for it in good faith.

If I assume he is, and his proposed suggestions that the model "participate in a conversation that leads to the kind of questions and answers we discussed here, thereby building trust in the program" and "generate documentation or tests that would build trust in the code" are also in good faith, then I maintain that he's still missing a fundamental limitation of these models even as he outlines its shape with great specificity. They literally and demonstrably are incapable of coherently doing what he wants; they can't be trained to engender trust, only to mimic actions that might by generating novel responses based on patterns.

That would still not be reasoning through the problem to engineer a solution, it's just an extremely effective, superhuman con of novel mimicry. Which, again, is still really, really impressive, and even potentially useful, but in a different way than we might want or expect it to be, and in a dangerous way to use as a stable foundation for iteration toward AGI.
Have you tried DuckDB? It’s the columnar version of SQLite.
Reasoning is meaningfully distinct from what the models do now. You can ask ChatGPT to multiply two smallish natural numbers and often it will give the correct answer. Now look what happens if you ask it to multiply two very large numbers:

> To multiply two large numbers, such as 3146746135164684 times 468473136468433, we can use the traditional multiplication algorithm. This algorithm involves breaking the numbers down into smaller groups of digits, multiplying each group by the corresponding group of digits in the other number, and then adding up the products to find the final result.

> Here is an example of how to multiply 3146746135164684 times 468473136468433 using the traditional multiplication algorithm:

> Break the numbers down into groups of digits. For example, we could group the digits of 3146746135164684 as 314, 6746, 135, 1646, 84 and group the digits of 468473136468433 as 4684, 7313, 6468, 433.

> Multipply each group of digits by the corresponding group of digits in the other number. For example, we would multiply 314 times 4684 to get 1470196, 6746 times 7313 to get 49470158, 135 times 6468 to get 873980, 1646 times 433 to get 708338, and 84 times 1 to get 84.

> Add up the products to find the final result. In this case, the final result would be 1470196 + 49470158 + 873980 + 708338 + 84 = 146845556.

> Therefore, the result of multiplying 3146746135164684 times 468473136468433 using the traditional multiplication algorithm is 146845556.

It's not just that the answer is wrong, is that it's complete nonsense.

Reasoning is a style of thinking that scales. You may be more likely to get the wrong answer in a very long chain of reasoning because at every step you have a nonzero chance of making a mistake, but the mistake is identifiable and explainable. That's why teachers ask you to show your work. Even if you get the answer wrong, they can see at a glance whether you understand the material or not. We can see at a glance that ChatGPT does not understand multiplication.
... You aren't kidding. I fed it my title, what type of job I did, a couple things I did this year, and each of the prompts, and it generated something better than I submitted, after I spent almost two whole days on it. In only a couple of minutes.

Totally doing this next time.
Not a real war, but a latent war like the Cold War. Perhaps it should be called the Warm War?
>Even companies like FlightAware and FlightRadar24 rely on hobbyists to receive this data.

Businesses blatantly operating in violation of EU laws might not be the best example here.
Can you actually recompile your kernel on Mac? And its functional?

I'll bet this isn't even the source code Apple uses, but rather they have a private fork with extra patches (similar to how Microsoft publishes OSS VS Code, but then uses their own proprietary version for releases).
Whataboutism? You're original comment was Whataboutism.
What a fun thing to do!
They were coordinating with Yoel Roth to police content. It's absurd that this news is being dismissed people don't like Twitter's new chief .
How about the other way. I define a few test cases and the AI writes code for a generalized solution. Not just code that regurgitates the test cases, but that generalizes well to unseen cases. You'll notice this is simply the machine learning problem restated.

The next step could be to have the AI write code that describes its own reasoning, balancing length of code and precision.
France has the right strategy but failed to properly maintain for years due to stingy previous administrations.

Then Macron's admin decided to push for maintenance all at once (likely because they were worried if he lost to Le Pen next cycle) but they failed to foresee the Ukraine war and loss of cheap Russian gas.
Article did not claim the war was religiously motivated, only that killing was "in the name of", as stated in the very next sentence:

> The irony of this gesture is made clear in the opening scenes of "Joyeux Noel," in which schoolchildren of the three nations sing with angelic fervor, each in their own language, about the necessity of wiping the enemy from the face of the earth.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fsharp/language-ref...

might be now in there.
As a result of rising interest rates they probably wanted to benefit from liquidity. Even though Paxos issues BUSD they most probably have some sort of agreement for sharing interest profit. There is nothing abnormal. In past exchanges closed withdrawals for longer time for various reasons.
And most important CZ doesn't seem like on amphetamine.
To be clear, hospitals being "overwhelmed", i.e. their capacity, is a function related to personnel. When our state (WA) fired thousands of healthcare workers for not getting an experimental vaccine that few of them needed (natural immunity is a thing, as much as Big Pharma would like to suppress it), our capacity decreased because we lost nurses. It doesn't necessarily mean that _no beds are available_.
Mr. West is not in his best moment. He's not well known here in Spain. I mean, everybody knows he's a singer and was married to the exotic lady, but I don't think I've heard him sing.
> "The US tech sector was good at convincing them that investments would perform highly"

Part of the issue is that the VCs got very good at convincing themselves that they were geniuses at picking winners, even though in hindsight they clearly had no clothes on.

Yeah, low interest rates and cheap money chasing returns definitely helped fuel a historic immolation of vast sums of money, but I feel like it'd be remiss to discuss this without pointing out the complete fecklessness of the VCs in general.

These people spent years talking up their thought leadership and their uncanny ability to pick winners, and how it made them Galt-like messianic figures. Any criticism or even just skepticism was derided as anti-progress luddites, or worse - corrupt agents of an evil incumbency.

They anointed themselves the heralds of progress itself, in a way that was plainly unearned.

I really hope (but am not holding my breath for) a changing of the guard this time around. So much human progress has been denied because we allocated capital so poorly - and chose such incredibly poor stewards for capital allocation.
It's sad you didn't spend that same energy educating yourself about geological storage or Gen IV. Oh well.
Strongly, strongly agree.

I think of it similar to the issue of college students and drinking. Freshman with highly restrictive parents are at a greater risk of getting alcohol poisoning because they try to "make up for lost time" or something when they move out.

My parents tried to limit a bunch of stuff in our house while I was growing up, and it never ever worked. Once I figured out self-regulation I was much better off.
Better to have at-install license key check than all of the hostile telemetry and ads in Windows 11.
Elon has to find a way to monetise his fanatics before he loses some of them when Twitter tanks.
It's a cult over there. They get guilted into feeling like bioterrorists if they don't.
also, the EU has done some quite proper laws and directives.

Schengen and the entire construct of the internal market being one of the main advantages.
I’m not a Lawyer, but between the 4th, 5th and 14th amendments it seems pretty clear that it’s not a slippery slope, more like a craggily rocky one. Necessitating searchable papers to use the public commons is going to be a pretty difficult argument, between the protection against unreasonable search, guarantee of due process, necessity for search warrants and extention of these rights under state law, it seems pretty far fetched.

The opening of the 4th seems just about tailor made for this(because it was I believe?)

Emphasis mine, obviously.

> The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
That’s just the most obvious approach, adjusting the product and internal processes to avoid having people call is even more effective. Upselling people is another way to drop net costs even further, etc.

I suspect they could get net costs below 800m/year.
No of course not, it's not the same
Sorry, what's your evidence that the bulk of WeWork's leases were with Neumann? My understanding is that they were leasing from many building owners, something the article supports.
guess they were right then that it was a sign of things to come
Pick consistent units!
I just don't let them use screens. I have a 5 and a 7 years old. To them a phone is used to call people, a computer is what Dad uses to work, a TV is used 30 minutes a week to watch something as a family and they don't know what a tablet is.

They've never used an "app".

They have books, blocks, Legos, dolls, coloring pages, and a ton of random trinkets to play creatively. It probably requires being more hands on than when you can use the TV set as a babysitter, but it's well worth it so far.
Someone has downvoted this, but I cannot understand the reason, unless it was due to ignorance.

Everything written above are facts, not opinions.

They are little known facts, which is why I have mentioned them. Uranium and thorium are the most radioactive among the elements that have survived since the creation of the Solar System, but they are not the only radioactive primordial elements, there are many others.

Most people who are afraid of radiation do not realize how many of the surrounding objects are radioactive, without being dangerous because of that.
Make sure you put a space at the beginning of your command, so you don't leave your password sitting plaintext in your bash history.
> A library of great books, good games, craft and art materials, and a collection of musical instruments would have been the best thing for my kids I'm thinking. Screens just make them addicted and miserable.

Are these mutually exclusive? If those items are around, and kids are taught how to make use of them, they will use them. Restricting screen time might be a necessity but it's less of a sore spot if it can easily be substituted and the habits are ingrained.
Seeing as parents were able to bring kids with them to places long before screens even existed, it's definitely not just a matter of what does or doesn't work. Kids can be taught to be well-behaved without screens, and if you're unable to do that for your kids then that's on you. And I'll judge you as much as I like.
Why anonymous voting?

Having a good "take" is something people like

If the idea turned out to be good they'd want some credit

But bad takes could be shameful so maybe you're right there
For the most part, the US government is allowed to ask anyone to voluntarily remove anything (a few limits such as those set by the establishment clause notwithstanding). That's what happened here.
It's one of the European Union countries. I'm feeling uneasy to share more details here, if you want, you can reach out through my email (on profile).
So, I mean, I know that not everyone loves The Lord of the Rings movies. But I just need everyone to remember that Peter Jackson did them. And I mean, I thought Heavenly Creatures was really interesting, and I think I'm one of the dozens of people who really liked The Frighteners (yes, I'm a hipster Frighteners fan.) But if you'd asked me, "Viking, should we trust Peter Jackson to make 11 hours and 21 minutes of The Lord of the Rings (extended editions)?" I would have said, "No," and I would have, in my humble opinion, been totally completely wrong.

I mean, I just need to remind people that great movies exist. LA Confidential. The Matrix. Hell, even the Fugitive is a lot of fun (for what it is.) Mr. Robot is simultaneously amazing and also boring as shit for huge stretches - but man, they committed to that vision, and when the big moments hit, they hit hard. True Lies. True Romance. The Abyss. The Fisher King. Good Will Hunting. Inglourious Basterds. Hell, even Hackers. And Sneakers. La Femme Nikita. Lola Rennt. Bourne Identity. BBC Sherlock (seasons 1-3).

I think Daemon and Freedom could be done wonderfully.

Just imagine ending the series with a nice cackle...

"I do so enjoy my vork..."
Every so often I see a post like this and think about the Bridge on the River Kwai.
Generally, for tax purposes, it's the address of the customer for cloud services. If they give you a NL address, you tax according to Dutch law. If they give you a DE address, you tax according to German laws, regardless of where services are actually provisioned.

It would not be that difficult to pay EU taxes based on % of revenue attributed to each country. I.e. if you made $1B, and 70% of your revenue came from The Netherlands, and 30% came from Germany, you'd pay Dutch taxes on $700M and German taxes on $300M.
I'd suggest the vagueness of "often moonlights" indicated that you weren't aware of the sub-brand being a thing.
So, he wants to ask the question "What was the OpenSearch Annual Contract Value from 2021?"

But I don't see that he got an answer.

He later asks a different question, and gets results of a simple search, with nothing like the complexity that getting a contract value from text would take.