skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is not at all like setting up a special microphone to eavesdrop on someone. A person with a baby monitor would be broadcasting a signal onto public airspace with an amplified radio transmitter. If it comes into my airspace why can I not receive it using the same technology? Why does one person get to use publicly allocated radio frequencies and other does not? Is this fair? If the baby monitor broadcast on non-public frequencies it would be doing something much more illegal than me receiving them.

You are criminalizing receiving but not transmitting. I contend this is no different to yelling out of your window and criminalizing people hearing you. if you cannot come up with something other than 'it is wiretapping and private' to argue against broadcasting unencrypted radio into public airspace with a radio transmitter being by definition a public broadcast then I ask you not to respond because there is no answer to something like that, just as there is no answer to someone contending that listening to something people yell out of windows is a violation of privacy.
Any gains to winter range would likely be lost to the added weight year round.
Your current car is only a few years old and has relatively low mileage, so the best course of action is obviously to keep driving it. Unless there's something seriously wrong with it. Otherwise, buy a used car.
Such a disclaimer is valuable when the commenter hasn't read the article themself.
I don't think this rule is intended to encompass comments about yourself.
The preamble is intended for synchronization, the last two consequtive ones indicate the start of the data.

My circuit doesn't drop any frames, it simply converts serial Ethernet signal to SPI. FCS and MAC checking is done in software after receiving the whole frame.

You absolutely can get frames not addressed to you. Wireshark lets you do that. I debugged my adapter this way: I connected it to a dumb switch together with my computer and ran Wireshark on the computer which captured all frames regardless of their intended destination. On Linux you can even disable FCS checking and receive all rubbish from the wire.
isn't this just that China has newer plants than the US? in the US, no one is building new coal plants (for good reasons)
I'd do it once for the experience. I doubt there's any real appreciable actual personal danger. But, with that experience, I probably wouldn't do it again anytime soon.
The TL;DW is that people are stupid, and they do what “influencer” clowns tell them to do, with zero critical thought.
They had a confrontation where Russian government blocked Telegram until they give access. Then later lo and behold they unblocked Telegram with the above statement by Durov. I don't see how it's too uncharitable of an interpretation of those events that I have.

That Russians and Ukrainians use Telegram is the exact issue here! Tons of my fellow Russians and I imagine most Ukrainians use Telegram to exchange statements that literally make them extremists or just criminals in the eyes of Russian gov, the very gov Durov declared collaboration with to get unblocked in the country where TG has the most users, they do it every day and without the impaired secret chats feature.
Last time I mentioned this here I was condescended to that this is a group policy setting. I'm not allowed to change them or request a change, but maybe you can.
Fuck cancer. I wish you the longest possible time.
You'll be fine if you're able to keep the car connected to a charger overnight. Many EVs have an option to pre-heat the battery while on the mains power, so you don't lose the range on heating the battery up.

Get a BEV with a heat pump. This improves winter efficiency.
So a smartphone, then?
How would you compare your offering to https://github.com/iann0036/iamlive (an opensource implementation of IAM generation from client-side monitoring or proxy, released in Feb 2021)?
I mean its not a scam if you get a toy after you pay for it. The issue with this scam is none of these people got what they paid for.
Overall, the reasoning in the text appears to be valid. It is true that the cost to build a fusion reactor may never be cost-effective compared to solar and wind energy, but from a human and scientific perspective, it makes sense to continue researching and developing fusion technology. It is possible that in the future, we may need fusion power for space exploration or other purposes, and it is important to continue pursuing this technology in order to advance our understanding and capabilities in this area.
My younger (step)son is 20. I wanted to ease him into taking responsibility. We rented the house to him and two of his best friends who we have known forever and we know their parents at a discount. Their rent just covers interest and taxes and the three non fixed utility bills. We still cover the internet, yard, HOA, pest, trash, etc.

We were going to do that at least two years. But, I was using my stock vests to offset the costs and well you know how stock is doing these days.

Next year we will add a set fee to partially offset some of those expenses like a real apartment does.
A note on styling. The font is rather large. On my phone, this means the column is narrow. Full justification is hard to read when you have 2 emdash spaces between words.
In the best case scenario where the car is in a garage, I've heard that you can pre-emptively bring it up to temperature on grid power and a great deal of the cold-induced range loss goes away. Might still work for outdoor parking, just a bit less shielded of an environment.
Wake up and drink two glasses of water before coffee or breakfast. Always makes my mornings a little better.
The irony of Richard's decision and justification is how misguided it was (and is) on multiple fronts.

First, GCC as a whole has never been technically superior to the commercial competition. The reason why GCC was popular outside the GNU crowd and received as much funded development is that it was the best compiler across a range of popular platforms and had the best price, too.

Second, one of the main drivers behind the creation of clang has been the hostility to making the C/C++ frontend of GCC usable as a standalone tool. Richard explicitly wanted to force everyone to either deal with the GPL and his interpretation of what is derived work, or shell off the bucks for the Edision Design Group. This was a calculated choice as no one would want to invest the time to write another C/C++ frontend, right? He intentionally ignored all other use cases for C/C++ parser as a library (Language server, anyone? Refactoring tools?) and thereby actually hurt the user base on the GNU platform just as well. It can not be understated how disruptive clang was as a set of libraries outside the LLVM/clang compiler.

Third, GCC had as middle and backend compiler always was moderately accessible, but by structure somewhat harder to access for researchers or people wanting on special purpose tools like optimized code generation for computational kernels on matrixes.

GCC was forced to acknowledge the competition by finally getting a plugin interface in the GCC 4.5 days, but at that point, the cat was out of the bag.
Nobody can say it can't happen, but the reality is that the operators of the big instances so far at least have understood that there's an inherent damaging effect to defederating instances that has a sizeable proportion of genuine users that means it's generally treated as a last resort except for "purebred" abusive instances.

What happens if it should come to pass is that users will need to decide whether they like it like that, or move to a third party instance that doesn't block either one or only block the one they want blocked.

And the prospect of a user exodus (for a decision either way) is an incentive for admins to pay attention to what their users actually wants. To me that's just fine (though I'd like improvements to the user migration functionality to make this process even easier).

I could worry about this, or I can worry about Musk's whims. On Mastodon I can move elsewhere (and did; where I started was fine, but I'm now on my own instance because I like having more control). On Twitter, there's no recourse. As such I'll take those future hypotheticals over what's happening to Twitter any day.
What was illegal? Disney was selling character stuff for decades prior. Star Wars toys were licensed by Lucas before that movie came out[1].

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenner_Star_Wars_action_figure...
There was a youtube video they uploaded about the logan brothers and the father take turns to kiss a girl blindfolded. So the parenthood is exactly as how it's intended

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoF6Tajj4UM
I personally think they should just update the stack so they can do realtime control.

Pay 5G networks to have priority data feeds for video, and send all the data back to an operator with 50ms glass to glass latency. Then have the remote operator drive.

Always have the car in a position to take over and stop incase the comms link gets cut. Usually that will involve either slamming the brakes on hard or gently, depending if there is an obstacle ahead or someone following behind.

That means they no longer need to handle 99.9999999999% of cases, but instead just handle 99.9% and detect the rest for a human to do.
Light oscillates much, much faster than a few hundred million times per second. Take 1 micron wavelength. At a speed of 3e8 m/s, 1 micron light oscillates 3e8/1e-6 = 3e14 times per second. Three times ten to the fourteenth power.

For anybody who doesn't juggle large numbers every day, a hundred million is 1e8. Ten to the eighth.
checkout ubricity, have not used them but the concept is pretty neat: use street lights for ev charging.
I try to avoid both commenting and downvoting, but I'll make an exception here. Your comment is pedantic and unhelpful. When the guidelines say "someone", they mean "someone else". This is to avoid derailing the conversation with accusations that one cannot prove. It's just fine to state that you yourself either read or did not read the article. In this case, I appreciate the poster's honesty, but would encourage them to read the article anyway so as to more accurately address its flaws.
They both do completely different things. I won't use ChatGPT as a study buddy, and I won't ask Google to write me a complex dockerfile. Frankly, either service compliments the other.
Super interesting. I always wondered why the US call "cider" their apple juice and do not know the real thing.
Yeah people are addicted, I don't think people are going to abandon the platform at that rate. They don't care about Mudge's revelations, people don't care about security issues until it directly affects them. The issue is just that Musk has massive debt obligations forged at the top of the market and ad revenue is supposedly shrinking due to him torching the brand during a recession. I don't see Twitter Blue making up the difference or growing revenue at a large enough rate to avoid bankruptcy but I don't have intimate knowledge of their finances.
Yes, but you need to use the “energy” app and have nav destination set. The little mi number next to the battery is “miles of ideal range”, so flat 65mph 70 degrees etc.

The energy app shows you live estimates based on distance, elevation, wind speed, temperature, humidity, tire pressure, cabin climate load, and even your phone charger.
Coal is fine with steam. Make it supercritical and do fancy stuff. You're simply piping water through furnace with extra steps. It is a material science questions.

For all traditional water reactors you are using the water to slow down the neutrons. Enter the Pressurized Water Reactor(PWR). Now the entire reactor is pressurized with all the complications that bring and through Carnot's Theorem you gain some efficiency.

This is nuclear's problem with trying to become more efficient.
“Why should I fear death? If I am, then death is not. If Death is, then I am not." - Epicurious
This was exactly my thought. I have no idea how adults are following Logan Paul and dropping tens of thousands of dollars on his obvious crypto grift. I cannot wrap my head around it, I thought his audience was young, impressionable zoomers.

It wasn't even his first crypto scam! He'd already run thru the same thing with "Dink Doink" (which iirc Coffee mentions in the video). It's incredible.
everything went right. He's from the generation of rich kids that happened upon the internet when it was possible to impress even younger children and gain audience by flaunting elements of one's wealth.

Post YouTube there was a huge gold rush of rich kids looking to be at the front of queue using their parents money to buy impressive production or stage outrageous stunts. Tragically these rich kids apparently missed out on the character development arc where they fail and better themselves as people before they succeed. That's why today many of them are grifters and scammers.
Places like Colombia, India, China, South Africa.

There the average person doesn't agree that transwomen are women.
> Did the J6ers get a trespassing charge as well?

I think there was something like 800 charged, and many did get charged with tresspassing as that was the easiest charge to lay.

Just a quick search shows up this:

"Griffin now faces the same conviction as a number of Capitol riot defendants who pleaded guilty to a single charge of illegally entering restricted grounds."

https://www.cbs58.com/news/judge-finds-january-6-defendant-g...
Anytime alternative sources of clean energy come up there are always comments about the problem with using them (What happens if there is no wind, water, sun etc), or about storing excess energy (we can't create a reliable battery network). The reality is that the fossil fuel sources we currently use had tons of engineering issues that had to be solved for it to work at scale. It took decades but we got there.

I'm confident with enough bright minds we can solve all of these problems with clean energy. It will just require time and energy and actual investment that isn't lobbied against by big oil. For example I'm confident that if we commit to nuclear energy we can find a way to get reactors built in under five years. And even if we didn't if enough were being built in parallel you could have one being onlined every year in every state just like how a new phone comes out every year, even though it takes years of development to make the next one.
I have a relative who joined Facebook in the early days, and then passed away shortly after.

Her account is still up, and FB talks about her like she’s alive.

There’s no way for me to inform FB that the inevitable has become actual.

FB has a “memorial archive” feature, but distant relatives have to way of initiating it. The people closest to her don’t have a Facebook recognized connection.

She’s been gone over a decade.
One subjective thing I discovered in a decade of playing ice hockey is that it seems like there are people where time slows down during high intensity situations. Sadly I'm not one of them.

Maybe I'm just describing something obvious related to adrenaline or fight vs. flight. But I wonder if some people are just physiologically better wired for these situations. Would that make them better at sports or warfighting?

It also reminds me of birds and other animals that seem to effortlessly perform incredible feats at high speed. But to their frame of reference and perception of time, maybe the world is just very very slow moving.
Well, except the article and the argument aren't what we were talking about.

You were talking about % of users using an option and the cost of using it, to which I argued that it's quite difficult even with perfect telemetry to know whether people are not using an option because they don't want to use it or they just cannot find it. Telemetry data like this just tells you N% of users do X; you don't know why just from the fact that they do it. The user base for my product does X which is contrary to the intended design all the time, and we don't know why until we get to one on one discussions as to why they tried it that way, and even that is very difficult data to get.

Your article here is not really related, it's about choices in UI that are confusing (and also cannot be enabled/disabled from the UI), and in fact I even understand this point to undermine the first; even if Microsoft continues to do large amounts of user testing, are they doing anything meaningful with the data if they continue to have too many choices?

I don't think there's a lot of sense to speculate on why Microsoft made a choice unless they publish a claim as to why they made a choice; we can point to data and anecdata endlessly to support positions but it doesn't actually make a case for the affirmative in either way.

What I am to say is that even with user testing, countless options, and so on, at best you can say that on a vanilla installation, N% of a sample group did X. With extrapolating statistical math, you can assume with a margin of error that if N% of users from Z sample set did X, then Y% of users will likely do the same with some margin of error.

From anecdata I can know from other persons who call themselves Windows power users and/or technical persons, I know that the common response to most Windows changes is not that it's good or bad, but that you just learn to deal with it after awhile. Personally I take this as more negative, that is it's not active adoption it's begrudging acceptance, but that's a personal take.
Given autonomous driving, computer-dispatched and scheduled mini-buses and vans could make sense for a lot of scenarios where there's reasonable demand and no transit.
This article is good in some ways and mistaken in others. Particularly, as a criticism of the ITER/DEMO path to fusion, it is correct. That was never a viable path to commercial fusion.

The mistakes made, or else those allowed for but not predicted, listed without particular order,

* Not all fusion requires turbines. Eg. Helion's designs don't.

* Most if not all renewables require either energy storage, or much better energy transport, which must be factored into their price.

* The size of commercial magnetic confinement plants is not well represented by DEMO, given new high temperature superconductors.

* (Personal opinion) The cost of fission plants is mostly a consequence of regulation, and this dominates the financial aspect.

That said, the idea that fusion has extremely tough cost competition from solar and wind, and that it will get increasingly tougher over time, is (and has turned out to be) absolutely true.
You don't get.
One dude pay once 1.8 mln and Tesla on twitter is permanently banned or deleted for everyone.

I even got idea for additional micro service.
If you got banned by this payed action you can unban for payment 2xbanned amount.
So Tesla company pay 1.8 mln to person that banned it and 1.8 mln to twitter and it will get unbanned/undeleted.
I sincerely hope that you can make it work for the future as well, it sounds like a dream life to me.
No, give him ideas. The sooner he would go down the happier everyone would be.
A GUIDE TO GETTING LOST: DÉRIVE PROMPTS

Sometimes getting lost can be tricky, especially if you’re familiar with your city. Here are ideas to help you get lost.

Follow the noisiest direction

Go to a station on the city loop. Get on whichever train is leaving next. Get off the train when you reach the first station to have double letters in the name.
LOL of course he doesn’t.

> Public parks full of criminal element that make walking through it a high-stress, high-alert situation

This one is especially laughable, nothing could be further from the truth
> Luckily, we don't have to conduct this thought experiment...

You're implying that with TypeScript you will get your codebase spaghetti free which is obviously not true. You can have a code base that hasn't a single type error and yet be full spaghetti. This also holds true when working with any framework, backend or frontend.

> TypeScript and don't realize you can just... not use it?

I don't but the places I've seen TypeScript code bases still suffered from much more critical issues than type issues. Like using wrong ideas, wrong patterns, no tests, spaghetti code, but hey you know what? We use TypeScript and is great, and believe it or not that is becoming the rule, not the exception.
Well at the very least, shooing isn't effective. Shooting seems like it'd be a very permanent goose deterrent.
The iMX line is totally solid for ARM/Linux application work. I've been shipping with them for over a decade. The automotive sector uses it heavily because of the onboard hardware codecs for video and camera.

It's just the coprocessor stuff they're weak on. It's easier to just link up to a Cortex-M3 offboard, but then again NXP has completely screwed up their supply chain and these parts are somewhat hard to get.
Having Walmart hire private security is bad for both Walmart, the people they would hire and the society.

For Walmart it's obviously a cost, probably higher that the cost of goods stolen.

For the private security: they are literally risking their lives and they are probably not paid a lot. Shop owners get beaten up and sometimes killed when defending their stores.

For the society: we don't want privatized violence.

What is the security guard supposed to do when some big dude (or worse: a group) starts stealing stuff?

Get in a fight? What if they hurt the thieves? It's an assault and they could end up in jail for that.

And in SF the police doesn't bother to arrest thieves because D.A. was refusing to charge them.

So what would even be the point of e.g. detaining the thieves?
He's impossible, but not winning the golden boot anymore...
You would use your power only to harm them, why would they not use theirs likewise to make you suffer? This is the world you're trying to create?
My personal method is to type "ffmpeg" and then hit Ctrl+R repeatedly until I make it to the last time I used it to do what I want to do again now, and then adapt the command from history to my current needs.

It's not very efficient, but I don't feel it needs to be, and it requires no particular setup (except setting Bash to keep history forever but that's something useful I would do anyway for other use cases).
You seem to have zero empathy for people in different situations than your own. Who hurt you?
Almost like Microsoft can only make UIs worse.
The Washington Post story lists several theories and puts the spotlight in a bad thing that may have happened here. Hopefully that will inspire other investigators to keep digging. Newspaper reporters are not given infinite resources to chase stories.

If you want to get off your butt I’m sure you could probably contribute to the investigation yourself. It seems very amenable to volunteer “OSINT” type of research from dedicated volunteers.
It's interesting to go to any historical topic on Wikipedia that is related to Ukraine or Russia right now. There are thousands of edits since February on every single one of them. It doesn't matter if it's related to the situation at hand. Quite a few of them are rewriting history. It's so hard to find old information about this conflict even when you set the time frame from anywhere to 2020 a lot of recent stuff shows up on google and things I remember are drowned in a sea of noise. But besides the drowning even the same big reputable publications have revised their own coverage as of this year as if the past never existed. Here's an example:

https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/05/02/the-historian-whitewash...
Also, I suppose another problem with steam is that you're heating up the planet directly. Perhaps someone with active thermodynamics knowledge can say how much of a deal that is.
Yes but slowly
Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. You’re a plague and we… are the cure - Smith