skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Like many new things, Mate can certainly be an acquired taste!

The instructions you’re seeing are for the traditional bombilla (cup) and pipe/straw.

Funny that you refer to it as an “…incredibly hipster and convoluted drink”. It is actually a traditional drink enjoyed for hundreds of years and consumed daily by tens of millions.

You can brew it like any other loose leaf tea, but if you have problems with fiber particles you can just use a normal coffee filter after brewing and before transferring it to a coffee cup.
It's both. Look up council complaints and demands for the HS2, they're full of unreasonable NIMBY stuff like asking for the line to be put in a tunnel because it comes closer than 100m to an industrial estate. They didn't get it of course, but as a "compromise" they got high berms after a lengthy consultation/bargaining, both of which inflate the cost.
I didn't think _fusion_ was the problem, but rather fusion that generated energy in excess of what was put into the system?
+1 to LunarVim, I use it daily. It has sensible default shortcuts and plugins. I think I have configured maybe 2 things in the last few years.
As I am preparing to update a 10 year old project done in backbone/coffeescript this whole thread hits hard. Likewise a react prototype done in 2018 that is all class based that is going to be next to revive.

Maybe I should just write my own framework... quick, to the name generator sites!
Related Wikipedia on Fusion Ignition:

- https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_ignition

And additional news source:

- https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/12/breakthr...
Both things can be true, and are in the case of fentanyl. The lethal dose is small in absolute terms, perhaps as low as 2mg[0]. The therapeutic window is large in that doses around 50mcg[1] are useful for pain relief in adult patients. That's 1/40 the potentially lethal dose.

[0] https://www.dea.gov/resources/facts-about-fentanyl

[1] https://www.drugs.com/dosage/fentanyl.html
For me, a lot of the value add comes from being able to open up files from a terminal, almost instantly, and make changes way quicker than I would through an IDE. It's also much faster when doing trivial and repetitive changes.

If you're interested you can look up how macros work in Vim. You can automate entire sequences of key strokes which goes beyond 'find and replace'. It's awkward at first but after you master it it becomes second nature and feels like you're working at the speed of thought.

When I have to use an IDE I usually try and install a Vim plugin.
Citrix ADC/Gateway zero day
What do institutions and Citizens United have to do with marijuana legalization? MJ has been illegal for decades in the U.S., before Citizens United. The fact of the matter is that this is a problem with the electorate, not CU or institutions.
As expected. As interest rates rise more capital that would otherwise be allocated on businesses, real estate, stocks, etcetera is redirected into safer and now more attractive bets like bonds and interest rates tied instruments
> It makes sense since parts of the pipeline just process individual values, they are not supposed to have context of the whole stream.

> I agree this is unconventional, but it what enables many of the advantages like pipeline structure of the program and conciseness

I'm not sure I agree with this. There are no operators that work on streams other than `select` since most other operators are ambiguous. This means streams are not first-class values (they are not at the same level as all other values).

It doesn't have to be designed this way, if we differentiate between stream and nonstream values you could have

'.someattr[] | smap(.otherattr) | sreduce(+)'

where `smap` is a stream equivalents to `map`

The language won't be as compact but it will gain significantly in readability and consistency, and its pipelining will continue to work just as well.

Its like designing a language where everything is an array and where every operation implicitly maps over the array. In those cases you can't have a "reduce" operation, because its ambiguous whether you want to run reduce on every individual element or you want to reduce the entire array of elements.
nice, I needed a program like this. is there something similar for Android?
> I don't see a reason to be monogamous to one IDE/editor :)

Years of muscle memory.
"Go back to"??
My biggest issue with Vim is that there is no IDE which has perfect Vim integration / emulation. It always feels a little bit off. And I really want an IDE for debugging purposes.

Thankfully Neovim is getting better at debugging, so maybe I'll go that direction.
Take vimtutor everyday for a week, after that supplement with "Practical Vim"
Came here to say this. If you don't like it, don't use it, but it sure does seem to make things easier for other developers (Ruby and not-Ruby-but-assigned-to-this project) to understand. I like it.
I am waiting for a specific instance of some ChatGPT system that can absorb individual table logic and then lets me build queries in addition to pre estimating the time, resource loads, and costs involved once you say go.
But it can probably be summoned from many polluted waters.
CPI: Prices rose less than expected in November, up 7.1% from a year ago
For existing Heroku projects, I chose Render. For newer projects, I mostly use Fly.io. It also depends on a few more factors like Postgres need of the project, in which case I choose Fly's managed services. Fly.io also makes it easier to deploy docker based projects. Render is more like plug-a-GitHub-repo-and-play.

Bear in mind that I'm only comparing these too in terms of their free tiers.
Oxy is legal and look how bad that situation is.
For anything lsp related, this fork by the lsp authors has been noticeably snappier and more pleasant to use for me (large rust project): https://old.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/ymrkyn/async_nonbloc...

It moves the json rpc stuff to be async, and makes a real difference in terms of perceived performance.
Finally. I have been longing for simple paint.net style video editor ...
"if" is almost always easier to reason with, "unless" can be elegant, but it's so often misused that it doesn't really matter
It worked to get him to a net worth of 100bn why wouldnt it work again.
That's not ignition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_ignition . They are redefining ignition to make the current improvement more trendy, but they are very far away from true ignition.
Enable Long File Name Support in Windows 10
Bit operations are fast, branches are slow.
Show HN: Fast, Clientless Oblivious DNS
We built a new secure DNS service at dns.invisv.com or 35.244.200.159 -- give it a try and let us know what you think. "Clientless" in this context means it works on normal devices/browsers/OSes (without requiring special client software): it supports normal clients with DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) -- at https://dns.invisv.com/dns-query -- and DNS-over-TLS (DoT), but adds the multi-hop privacy of Oblivious DNS.

It’s an alpha service running only on the free tier at fly.io (with servers in three regions/locations in the US: Los Angeles, Dallas, Washington DC) through GCP and Fastly (using our Multi-Party Relay stack). Despite that, it seems to be as fast as other popular DNS services for users in many areas of the US, and, more importantly, we apply the decoupling principle to improve user privacy.

The background here is that normal DNS queries are revealed to the DNS servers we use for everything we do online, and so we all rely upon the promises made by the providers of those DNS services to not log or use that data that they have about all our Internet usage. In prior research, we developed Oblivious DNS (ODNS), which tunneled encrypted DNS queries over DNS, thereby hiding the client's IP/identity from a second-hop DNS resolver that actually sees the unencrypted queries. (The ODNS approach was rolled out over HTTPS for Safari browsing by Apple in iCloud Private Relay.) This approach requires a custom DNS client.

Instead, by tunneling DoH or DoT requests via our Multi-Party Relay (which uses the MASQUE protocol to tunnel requests through a third-party, in this case Fastly), we can enable ordinary DNS client stacks that only support plain DoH or DoT to get the benefits of ODNS.

Eventually we'd like to launch this service at scale, in partnership with another organization, to provide a fast, global, privacy-preserving DNS service that everyone can benefit from.
https://archive.vn/vteLJ
If you haven't watched Chernobyl on HBO/Sky/NowTV, you should. It's an excellent mini-series. I've rewatched it 2 or 3 times already.

Jared Harris does an excellent job playing Legasov.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_(miniseries)
This has the same energy as “we don’t have a gun control problem. We have a mental health problem” which every Republican says after every mass shooting
Running Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS right now. I have the `unattended-upgrades` service running for automated security patches, and I just run `apt-get upgrade` from time to time.

I'll be upgrading to 22.04 LTS tomorrow, last time I did that it went smoothly.
You have it the other way around almost 100%. The reason crypto has the absurd valuations that it does have is entirely because of the centralized exchanges that were offering an easy way for lots of actual money to come into the space (and leave it).

As the larger exchanges collapse, it's also clear that many of these prices were simply invented. For example, it's pretty clear that FTX + Alameda alone invented at least a few billion dollars that simply never existed, but that were priced into BTC and others. Tether is almost certainly doing something very similar, as may be Binance and others.

And these are just some of the make-believe dollars in crypto. You then have all of the minor coins where someone buys one for a dollar and sells it back for two dollars, and someone else who had bought a thousand for a thousand dollars gets shown by some exchange that their funds doubled in value! And now they can leverage that to buy even more worthless coins, causing someone else to think their funds are increasing in value and so on.

It's all a house of cards propped up by savvy unscrupulous marketers.

Will BTC or ETH or Monero fall to 0 if the exchanges died? Probably not, as people actually do use them in some small measure (international payments with countries with failed banking systems, money laundering, evading sanctions, etc). But they would be back closer to where they were 10 years ago, a few dollars or maybe hundreds of dollars for 1 BTC. And most of the others would just die out.
> It won’t, just like even in this thread you see the perennial “this is good, actually.”

That's not quite what the grandparent poster was talking about.

One strain of thought on FTX/SBF has been conspiratorial. Allegedly, SBF was "a big Democratic donor" with connections in high places, so he would evade any serious US-based law enforcement action.

This view is likely related to FTX's (previous) attempts to present itself as the lawful-good crypto exchange, actively lobbying for US regulation. Such efforts necessarily come with a lot of political deal-making, making the idea of a corrupt bargain more superficially plausible.
If they fired everyone who leaks we would have no public officials.
I'm a nonexpert and don't have time to develop expertise, even lay expertise, in this field. What I want to see before I get excited about fusion iss a practical application of the technology. I'd like to see it power something real: a factory, a server farm, or some other energy intensive facility.

Hopefully this is an important first step, but this seems like an extraordinarily hard problem. Often, scaling these technologies is the most challenging part of implementing them.
Note that you could also solve this with AND/OR, with just a little more complexity. To “turn on” the bit for the new leading character as you slide the window forward, you of course OR it with the bitmask for the window, and to “turn off” the bit for the old trailing character, you AND its complemented bit-value with the bitmask. Not as elegant as XOR, but still works, and shows that XOR properties aren’t essential to the solution.
Government employees are not supposed to leak, but not because of commercial concerns.

What a weird thing to be worried about.

"It's not fair that Deep Throat talked to the Post first!"
> Prescription drug sales reps market to doctors, attempting to convince them to prescribe certain drugs more frequently.

I dated a girl who went into pharmaceutical sales. They're basically bribed. They get kickbacks in some form or fashion.

They get invited to speak a medical conferences by drug company reps, those conferences just happen to be at luxury retreats.
2017-21 United States Ancestry Map: Top Ancestry by Census Tract
Nah. You need legalization and regulation so that people can buy known doses of known substances. Decriminalization is nice for keeping users out of jail, but as long as manufacture and sales are illegal the supply is still going to be fucked.
But we do care about it, that's why we're all scrolling through it.
Theranos and holmes ... convicted ONLY of defrauding VC investors. Not guilty of defrauding customers by faking medical tests etc.
Am I missing something? 10 million/330 milllion is 6x higher than 1/200.
I dread learning from noisy, discontinuous data such as click-through. Nice to know about algorithms that handle them well.
You can't be serious. In 1920, still a significant part of the population lived in absolutely abhorrent slums. People on average worked 60 hours weeks, and often in extremely unhealthy and dangerous conditions (for example, molten iron being accidentally spilled on some poor soul in Carnegie's steel mill wasn't an uncommon occurence). There were no antibiotics, so family deaths were much more common (leading to grief and depression). Overall, the conditions of living were so harsh that people were numbing themselves with alcohol on a massive scale, ultimately leading to Prohibition Act.
> why do the DEA and ATF exist

At some point organizations exist for the benefit of the organization only. What would success look like for people at DEA/ATF/etc?

The only true business value is trying to put oneself out of business.
If it's privately ran it needs to be profitable otherwise it will no longer be ran (at some point). Of course the privately ran business could change course at some time and become profitable (i.e. raise prices or discontinue unprofitable business lines / areas of service). But if that's the only X store left in town and they discontinue service, you're kinda screwed.

The same ends up being true for publicly ran things as well. Flint is a great example of a town that was not profitable and so Michigan stepped in and changed their water supply to decrease the towns cost (a scenario that would've been avoided if Flint wasn't broke, amongst other ways it could've been avoided). It's just that at the government level you can have many services that cost more than they take in (often because you just don't charge people for the service; which is fine) which get balanced out (eventually) by other "services" (often more general taxes) that take in more money than they cost.

If you live in a town and continuously it spends $X a year and takes in $<X a year, that difference is going to eventually cause a problem. Perhaps it means that roads will stop being repaired. Perhaps it means you'll have boil water notices all the time.
I would have to check more of Ofcom guidelines, but it's likely in there somewhere that drugs (with exceptions you mentioned), like cigarettes are explicitly prohibited from adverts.

In fact:

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast-co...

probably tells you why those 'little blue pill' adverts are only on after 9pm.
Only if you definition of elegance is "please express yourself in as convoluted a way as possible, so as to minimize the number of words I need to know."

The truth is there is a balance in all languages. Nearly every word was invented to prevent having to say a string of other words to mean the same thing.

"Unless" is a single word to mean "If not". I consider that elegant.

However, some languages take this too far, in my opinion. German famously has a word for nearly everything. I'm not sure that's elegant, in that it requires learning a far greater number of words.

English has many words that I wouldn't consider elegant, simply because they're uncommon or convoluted. Never use a 10 dollar word when a 5 cent word will do.

So, if, like me and the ruby community, you prefer to optimize for developer happiness, "unless" is an elegant choice.

If you prefer to optimize for peak computing performance, if may be more computationally efficient use "if not".

But, _unless_ you're saying that you never use the word "unless" in everyday language, I think we can agree it's a good word that has good applications. I don't see why that wouldn't be true in programming.
What about all the deaths from gang and moonshining activity that cropped up?
Google is your friend.

> macOS is getting more and more locked down.

Yes... and no. It's exaggerated. Apps must have a certificate (a "notarization") before they will run. However, "notarization" does not entitle Apple to any profit cuts or require using the App Store, and it can be disabled for technical users. You can install basically whatever you want, and using apps without the App Store is normal. As for tampering with the OS, it's now inside a Signed System Volume with System Integrity Protection which does make it more malware-resistant, but this can also be disabled for technical users. So... More locked-down out of the box than previously, perhaps, but for 90% of normal users I don't have a problem with that. They both do have functions for making the system more resistant to viruses without needing the bolted-on virus scanner Windows-style.
I'm not sure that making this sentence as obtuse as possible is a great idea to convey your point.
The positive about this is that it's inertial confinement. The tokamak design as is being built in the massive boondoggle that is ITER is (IMHO) fundamentally flawed. When dealing with a superheated plasma, you fundamentally have the problem of turbulence. So as neutrons escape (and lose energy while they do it) they destroy your container (aka "neutron embrittlement", one of my favorite terms). Add turbulence for something at 100 million degrees and I just don't see how that's viable.

Inertial containment essentially wraps the fusing mass in something to absorb the neutrons.

Still, even though exceeding the laser energy as direct energy output is significant, we're still nowhere near positive electricity output. There's efficiency loss with lasers, operating costs and degradation with lasers and efficiency loss in converting that energy to electricity.

The most obvious way is boiling water and turning a steam turbine. It's tried and true but is also a process with its own efficiency limits. There's a lot of talk of direct energy conversion but this still seems like pie in the sky.

For the record, the only power generation method with direct energy conversion is solar. Wind, hydro, coal, gas and fission all ultimately turn turbines.

I personally support non-ITER methods of further research in this area. Hopefully something will come of it. I'm not yet convinced commercial fusion power generation will ever be economic but I'd like to be proven wrong. I still see space-based solar power collection as the most likely future of humanity's power generation.
The lasers at NIF provide both the startup energy and confinement. They can't just shut them off because then they would lose confinement.
"but I feel that the fusion scientists have no problem silently playing along this misconception"

That is the way to keep the money flowing.

See

"How close is nuclear fusion power?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ4W1g-6JiY

and (different area but about how high investment physics works, "just around the corner")

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qqEU1Q-gYE
I've tried. Doesn't last long.
This lists some of its unique abilities:

https://docs.sciml.ai/DiffEqDocs/stable/

The routines are sufficiently generic, with regard to Julia’s type system, to allow the solvers to automatically compose with other packages and to seamlessly use types other than Numbers. For example, instead of handling just functions Number→Number, you can define your ODE in terms of quantities with physical dimensions, uncertainties, quaternions, etc., and it will just work (for example, propagating uncertainties correctly to the solution¹). Recent developments involve research into the automated selection of solution routines based on the properties of the ODE, something that seems really next-level to me.

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/834571/
I did, for my personal laptop and desktop, after 18 years on macOS.

But I am not a developer, I used creative tools from Adobe (Macromedia even) for almost 20 years.

Pop_OS! (on Wayland) helped a lot, and it has been a worthy transition. The replacements have been long and somewhat painful to find, but it all worked out.

I was simply too tired of the increased babysitting by macOS and the opaque telemetry and limitations.

I built a fanless AMD desktop loosely inspired by Joshua Stein's (here is a pic of my setup, but I now use 3 displays: https://mobile.twitter.com/Salis/status/1490739423981486082)

It made using my own devices fun again, even though I miss some of the convenience :)
That's odd. I found that the most valuable takeaway from the video is opening the file like he did. I didn't know about norm either. Altogether this was really great and I've been using vim for over a decade.
That was my conclusion too, this is a super easy problem with a fixed window length. The bit hashing is neat but I was too confused by what seemed to be an over-complication of the problem to really appreciate it. Did you and I both miss something here?
Marijuana seems to be an exception to this. After legalization it’s easier to get more and more and more concentrated versions
Climate Impact of Your Neighborhood, Mapped
Really? You're not concerned that government employees may be picking up some income on the side by leaking stories to whichever news outlet pays them the most? That's just a weird thing to be worried about?
Backblaze Adds US East Region
I hope you warmed up before stretching like that, as I'm afraid you'll hurt yourself.

I agree with you that the ADL's recent Israel positions are often short-sighted and terrible. But their century of tracking and fighting hate is solid work, and even if you didn't want to listen to them here, plenty of other groups agree with them on Bitchute. I even linked to one of them for you.

As to the rest, I'm not even sure what your point is. If you figure one out, let me know.
This has put our open-source hardware efforts out of public development. It stopped when I'd posted a picture of one of our prototypes, and it was ripped off before I even got a final quote from a metals vendor.

I feel like doing it behind closed doors results in many projects getting completed way slower. It still gets released as open source (and eventually ripped off anyway), but now there's no visibility into the process from the outside, which had been a big source of personal motivation in the past.
Many, many people use emacs and vim for everyday coding. You sound confident, but you'd also be wrong for a large swath of programmers.
I doubt the hashmap would beat the XOR method from the article. Hashmaps means allocations, and it means hashing. Hashing is going to be at least as much work as XORing a couple values in the mask. Hashmaps also means chasing pointers all over memory and ruining your cache.

You can add an early return to the OPs XOR method by just checking if the char is already in the bit mask. This will be faster if the word size is large.