skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What charisma is depends on the person. It is defined as ability to induce devotion in others and different people will get moved by different things.

Charisma is not an absolute and objective measure. Some people will find Trump charismatic to them, some people will see him completely opposite.

I personally find Warren Buffett very charismatic, some people will probably see him as an old and wrinkled guy who is boring them with stories they don't care about.

As investors are generally mostly interested in money, ability to get shit done and generate profits reliably IS charisma.
This study (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965262...) looked at what the actual impact of that carbon release would be. Even if deep sea mining completely destroyed the ability of the sea floor to sequester carbon and it took 100 years to recover, it would only release 0.025 gigatons of CO2.

In contrast, if we wanted to get the same metals from the land, it would release 0.065 gigatons of CO2.

While there's a good bit of uncertainty in these estimates. Regardless, the impact is dwarfed by the savings from more efficient smelting processes enabled by deep sea nodules, which could save about 1 gigaton of carbon.
TextEdit in the Browser
The OG XBox was de rigeur in every dorm room in the country. Mostly for Halo, but football games and racing games and such also made a showing.

The Gamecube's considered a flop because it sold worse than all their other game consoles except the (later) WiiU, which is their other major flop. At the time, it was sitting at the bottom of a not-promising trend line for Nintendo consoles (before the Wii blew that up). It also sold significantly worse than its contemporaries (XBox, PS2... better than the Dreamcast, but that hardly counts). I agree that it's a great system, in fact—the controller is, uniquely, brilliant for introducing young kids to controllers with more than a couple buttons on them, and feels great once you're used to it even for an adult, and it may be lacking in games but it's got a fair number of excellent entries in its library. It's easily my personal favorite of that generation (followed closely by the Dreamcast, actually).
No, those were the twitter files tweets.
As somebody with that attitude, it's because I find it quite zen just to relax and be groomed by a professional. I won't shut down conversation, but I won't initiate it either.

The other thing is that decades of motorcycling without ear plugs has rooted my hearing, so talking to people with thick accents (I'd say 50% of hairdressers here are immigrants) can't be tiring, which is the opposite of why I actually enjoy getting my hair cut. There's a nice Korean lady I sometimes see who chats away merrily, but I feel like an arsehole having to ask her to repeat herself the whole time.
Makes me smile too. Around 2008 while I was at Yahoo! I built a standalone library called Dhaka (literally stuck a pin in a map and used the place name as the project name) that did almost exactly this. It was used on a few of the EU sites but I left before I got chance to open source it. The problem I was trying to solve was eliminating a bunch of duplicate JavaScript that was essentially sending/fetching data to/from a remote source and inserting/replacing it into the current page.
how is it getting worse, exactly? I know it has features (all of which are optional) that can auto-generate code, but it _doesn't_ require being used. You can, and largely most do, use it just for the syntax for typing.

Is there something inherent with TypeScript that is causing issues that you can point to?
That's hopefully fixed now in 1.34.0+. We'll see!
1990: oh darn it not again! Find the nearest junkie and give them fl25

2022: call the insurance company to explain the €3000 van Moof is on it's way to Romania
Didn't we have those things already? Virtual-GL and Co. say hi.

Also for most real GPU applications, you need to get the data in and out. I don't think splitting compute across a (insert any non-Infiniband-link) solves this
I don't see how it's a ponzi scheme. I understand your other parts but ponzi seems like an inappropriate term
you could use a WeakMap to emulate private fields too
I have zero faith that what is released will not be deliberately slanted. Elon has made his leanings crystal clear, as well as the base he now wants to play to.
"Solar and wind power are not sufficient for spacecraft"

I guess you're right that solar is useful for 99% of spacecraft -- in that they use it currently. Not a very useful observation

"and many other applications"

Power in polar regions. How well does Solar work in Antarctica? Or Alaska for that matter?
More of that "free speech absolutist" in evidence.
I have an unusual folding bike. It's a Bike Friday Tikit, and basically has a Steal Me sign attached to it. But it also can be folded extremely rapidly and covered with a custom built-in cover so it looks like, oh, a tuba case.

My anti-theft strategy is: my bike has never had a lock. This forces me to fold and cover it and take it in with me wherever I go. Office buildings, federal buildings in DC (really), offices in the Smithsonian, labs. Restaurants nearly universally allow me to bring it in and tuck it somewhere because as long as it's covered no customer is going to complain; they don't even notice it. It's like a Jedi mind cloak. This was the case for Rome as well, when I had the bike there for about a year.

The only place I ever had an issue was the National Science Foundation. I biked to a panel meeting only to discover they wouldn't let me take the bike in. There was a bike cage in the basement but for "employees only". And the guard station wouldn't let me tuck the bike there out of liability concern. However it turns out that the panel meeting was on a second floor room which coincidentally was attached via a sky bridge to a shopping mall across the street with no guard station. The guards hinted that I take the bike to the mall, up the escalator, across the bridge, and right into the room. Which I did.
They don’t make specific promises except as a last resort because of things like 1104. I know a specific example of the feds losing a case because they granted immunity to get someone to fly to the US to testify. The witness completely blew the prosecution’s case. A federal prosecutor losing is quite the stain on their reputation. Immunity deals are the fastest way to blow a case.

The witness is supposed to say they cooperated because the law provides lighter sentences for those who cooperate voluntarily.
Now on Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@elonjet

And other places: https://grndcntrl.net/links/
HTMX is the perfect example of a project that, like jQuery, exists to be replaced with a W3C standard. And I don't think the people behind it would feel at all bad about that, as it fills a real niche that ought to have been filled a decade ago.
> Is there any economy that you are aware of that had high wage inflation without inflation in everything else?

'Inflation' isolated to wages is called wage growth. Every developed country has gone through a period of wage growth.

When you define the qiestion negatively, with 'wage inflation', the answers you get will be negative
US output has increased since the current admin took over https://www.macrotrends.net/2562/us-crude-oil-production-his...
Show HN: I made an OpenAI-powered tamagotchi that reacts to what you read online
You can create your own spirit animal based on any description you provide. It responds with an AI-generated summary of the page that you are on, using meta tags in the HTML of that page.

I made this during a hack week at work (koodos.com). I wanted to build something fun that used AI (this specifically uses DALL-E and GPT-3) that kind of acted like a companion as you browse the web - similar to a Tamagotchi or Clippy (rip).

Would love to hear what people think of it - let me know! :)
Ah cool, I see now what was actually going on here - shame on me for responding on good faith.
Those aren’t “swear words.” Nobody would object to their being used in children’s programming, for instance. While most people would be scandalized to hear characters in a children’s cartoon saying “shit!”
Talk with Open AI GPT-3 as an Assistant and Hear the Response
OpenAI's GPT-3 seems to be better than Google and smart home assistants so I wanted to make my own by wrapping the GPT-3 API in voice recognitions and text to speech.

I wrote a short script to recognize vocal input from a computer microphone, send the text to OpenAI's GPT-3 and respond with a voice over your speaker.
What if it decides to short the batteries and set the car on fire? Can you stop it from doing that?

I think you are making scenarios that no reasonable person would assume. There is a difference between 'getting confused at an intersection and turning wrong' and 'actively trying to kill the occupant by accelerating at max speed while turning the steering'.
Not "public stalking", you can't stalk a plane. It's just information about what his plane is doing, which is public information just like every other plane. If you wanted to stalk Elon Musk the person, you would just follow his social media accounts, he's on them constantly.
The comment that you're quoting wasn't mine. In the comment you link to says "UTF-8 by convention". If either string is valid, then the result is as expected. If you're concatenating two strings that are both invalid UTF-8, there's not much you can do that's better than just concatenating the bytes together... which is exactly what treating them as byte arrays would end up doing (but it's less convenient). If you're worried about invalid UTF-8 you can check for validity (which again, is exactly what you end up doing if you use byte arrays).
Interesting thoughts..

I'm just not sure if it would make a difference even if it was outlawed.

The algorithms are out there, and it will only be a matter of time until more organizations adopt them to make their own programs. The tech savvy will be able to get and use them eventually. The internet is worldwide and it would be out there somewhere where people could get it.

It will cause problems and disruptions of some kind in various industries. Chat to generated target email will be a problem, with the need for verification and a source.. Eventually generated realistic videos too. I don't know what the solution is. It might be more levels of identity are eventually needed for something like email. We're also in a time people don't trust centralized sources.

I just don't think outlawing it would sufficiently work.
> When using React/NextJS you still have to rely on third party library for routing, state management, querying etc.

You shouldn’t need react-router or other routing-related third-party libraries because Next’s router (and its file-based navigation system) should be enough(?). I’d also say that React itself has powerful-enough state management options (useState hook plus React context, if needed).

The only annoyance I ran into was getting proper i18n working and integrated with Next (with i18next). There were some issues with Next’s newer releases and a redesigned i18n setup that broke a lot of things for me and I regretted the dependence of multiple libraries and frameworks needing to work together. (Storybook is another library that kept breaking.)
Really depends on how they're being used.

If they're independently managing their own parts of the DOM, it can work (though still a dev headache imo).

If its a "react app", ie react is managing the entire dom, having two representations of the dom is a v bad idea in that one can make changes that the other is unaware of. Or visa versa.
Tesla was 19 out of 24 for reliability. BMW was 10th, in a recent survey.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/tesla-ranked-n...
Every time I read one of these threads I wonder if I'm somehow seeing different screenshots that what the author is talking about, because they're always full of some of the most uncharitable interpretations possible. The tweet linked reads like a biased summary of a biased summary.

I don't know people expect moderation to work, but it's inherently messy and imperfect because humans are messy and imperfect, and past a certain point you always end up having to trust the instincts and judgement of moderators.

As someone who has moderated large group before, my main reaction is "this stuff is surprising to people?"
What would you do if you were in their shoes?
SEC Proposes Rule to Enhance Competition for Individual Investor Order Execution
Point 4 is mostly confined to old abandoned sites, as mentioned in your link. Modern tailings aren’t left to leach acid all over the place, at least not in North American mines. I get that all bets are off in eg Africa, however.
A life in a walled garden surrounded by cameras. Not sure what the Rover is though :)
>Surface mining also has environmental consequences which have to be weighed against the costs of deep sea mining.

What will actually happen is both types will be happily used at the same time, so there's little point in weighting one against the other.

Any other rationalization misses the fact that this is an extremely poorly understood environment (especially if we do compare with surface mining). It's never a good idea to tinker with unknown at scale without understanding it first, let alone commercializing it. Mining history is practically written in mistakes like that.
> Writing a browser is very hard

And this pretty much sums up why I hate todays internet.

Writing a telnet client was super easy. FTP, a little harder, but doable. Writing an SVG renderer using any canvas like tech (Cairo, canvas, CoreGraphics) is moderate, but again pretty doable. The fact that the w3c has churned out spec after spec that layers more and more complexity on something that was supposed to be a document viewer with links and such that we find ourselves in a position where advancing the state of the art requires a small nations state worth of resources, just to come current, is profoundly depressing.
The first step is to really question if you need this level of complexity. Remove the things that provide no value. Break out data transformations into their own processes or microservices. Isolate them and really treat them like a black box. Unit test heavily here. Go is built for microservices. I've got a go application that I've inherited that's very light on the unit testing and heavy on the end to end integration testing. Golang doesn't make this sort of thing easy or enjoyable. I'll probably rip a lot of that out if we wind up changing major parts of it.

Remember, testing is an insurance policy. It provides no direct value to the business. That's not to say it shouldn't be done, it most certainly should. But when testing becomes the majority of your coding effort then it's time to start re-evaluating your testing approach.
It isn't doxxing. The information is publicly available already.

ElonJet just put the information on Twitter. And Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, and now Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@elonjet
So fixing security issues is ... bad?
> They got away with it for too long causing a lot of very concrete anti-competitive damage to progress of the Web.

How are you defining progress here? "Progress" is inherently value-laden.

Are you defining it only in terms of developer convenience, with the goal of making the web like an operating system? Or are you defining the web's progress in terms of freely available information and as a document retrieval system? It has obviously regressed in the latter sense.

Why isn't it just as reasonable to suggest that iOS Safari is the last bastion against the decline of the web?
Does that prove a direct correlation between reliability and panel gaps, or could it be merely a coincidence?

According to the article:

> "the Audi E-Tron and Volkswagen ID.4 were singled out as being unreliable"

So if Audi and VW are also unreliable then the panel gaps prove as a poor signal for reliability, which was my original point.

Edit after your reply below: Sure, Tesla has poor reliability, but not because it has poor panel gaps. Those two can be completely disconnected. Just because they coincide sometimes, doesn't make this a rule of thumb like some car snobs try to convince you of.

You can easily have cars with great panel gaps that are incredibly unreliable, and vice versa. Panel gaps mean nothing more than panel gaps.
I use Unpoly and not HTMX but similar idea, what you do for components entirely is up to you.

My components look like this. The JS and CSS is included in the application's bundles. Ruby renders HTML on the server side.

app/components/breadcrumbs
- _breadcrumbs.scss
- breadcrumbs_component.rb

...
app/components/search_field
- _search_field.scss
- search_field_component.rb
- search_field.js
- selections.html.haml
> Probably something like us.lax, fr.cdg, ko.inc, or a combination of country + number HK02, GB231 etc.

This naming system has been for such a long time that I woud'nt be surprised if any minor change breaks something somewhere. Probably some old school database that can only handle three letters, uppercase and no punctuation characters. Or perhaps a modern app that depends on json generated by parsing txt output from a terminal. Or even a barcode format that can't handle any more characters.
They had been doing that, and called it "shadow mode" [1]. I suspect it's no longer being done, perhaps they reached the limit of what they can learn from that sort of training.

[1] https://www.theverge.com/2016/10/19/13341194/tesla-autopilot...
certainly the need to exaggerate the news has crept through all facets of media in this annoying "attention is our commodity" era. even the most "boring" outlet has its more subtle versions of the cringey YT "wow face" thumbnail.

but just because fusion energy will not be responsible for warming your frozen pizza next week does not mean we need to belittle a major milestone like this one. sure some damn reporter has a quota to hit and metrics to game. it just means we need to dedicate a bit more effort to read the article, read between the lines, and apply critical thinking.

this is the dream technology of the far future we're talking about. it doesnt even need to happen for 1000 years. if we nail it we are set for Billions of years. but obviously people are not accustomed or incentivized to think about things on that sort of timeline.
No one cares about panel gaps. A lot of people on HN despise Elon and become relentless pedants when discussing any of his products/initiatives.
Your logic is astoundingly poor. Have another think about that.
Airtags and similar can work, but there are downsides. For one, AirTags specifically have a series of anti-stalker features. That means a thief knows the bike is being tracked. Second, any tracker you hide on the bike can be found by a thief and removed.

Having it integrated by the manufacturer means both avoiding Apple's measures and making it much harder to find and remove. So it's generally a preferable option when possible.
yup. and to be clear, Matrix really needs the money right now: https://matrix.org/blog/2022/12/01/funding-matrix-via-the-ma...
Hadn't heard of this, found concerns about the environmental impact & the CEO's previous company Nautilus Minerals:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Metals_Company

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manganese_nodule

(2021-Jun) https://www.wsj.com/articles/environmental-investing-frenzy-...
Is your experience the norm though? Uncut YouTube videos show a reliable FSD in many conditions
Only the terminally online think people buy Teslas because of Elon
I found the book Rama Revealed by Arthur C. Clarke and Gentry Lee to be an unbelievable and depressing outlook on the short sidedness of man's assault on limited resources.

And then I was driving through Phoenix Arizona, looking out at the concrete landscape and concrete riverways, and realized just how right he was.
Not to defend TSLA, but I don’t think self driving is the reason why Tesla cars sell, it is more about being arguably the best mass produced EV out there.
Toyota and other manufacturers will absolutely pivot into EVs, but most of their gains in EV sales will come (on average) at the cost of non-EV sales as the non-EV market shrinks.

Tesla however does not sell non-EVs so stands only to gain as the non-EV market shrinks. This makes up some amount of the expectations that give Tesla a higher share price per current revue than other car makers.

Thus even if Musk's "genius magic" effect on stock price goes away complete, that seems unlikey to eliminate all expectations for more growth from Tesla than other car manufacturers.

That said, I think we mostly agree now as I think a drop by 2/3rds in Tesla price is not out of the realms of possibility. It's hard to guage how big the "genius magic" effect is on stock price.

Personally, I suspect that significant issues (especially regulatory) around FSD are more likely to crater the growth expectations of Tesla than any Twitter bankruptcy.
Did you hear about the twitter files? It shows some pretty serious election interference and also shows how various staff either lied directly to congress.
Sure jQuery as a selector engine has more or less been replaced, css has advanced etc.

But the jQuery UI widgets are battle hardened and easier to deploy, case in point , date pickers, calendaries and well, slideshows.

And you can kind of replicate some of reacts behaviour regarding state management.

If all you need to do is keep state on a handful of elements, there is no need to develop in react.

Infact, just like the jquery heydays, react is often overused, for the most simply web forms, menus, footers.

And, no need for router and other state management tools.

Might be a bit unpopular, but when its all said and done, its compiled to js either way, I kinda like jquery or vanilla js for the front end and node/express for the back end.

The amount of react devs which struggle with css and vanilla js appears to be higher than during the jquery days.
My fortinet footprint would like to assure you that stuff which moves slowly also has problems. I try not to hold a CVE against anyone unless they are extremely stupid and reveal a lack of any technical controls.

wireguard is a linux-first solution and all of the windows stuff for it is subgrade, and probably will continue to be for awhile. Still selling plenty of anyconnect/globalprotect have a stranglehold on windowsland and probably will for a long time.
I'm just pointing out that we can have both reliability and tight panel gaps. We have the technology. They are separate things.

As are different models within a single manufacturer. I love my Ford, would highly recommend it, but would never buy or recommend a Pinto or a Bronco II.

The point people typically make is that Tesla has uncommonly poor panel gaps, which point to poor quality and tolerance control in their manufacturing. This is a complex skill that automakers have been refining for 100 years. It is indicative of something, just as the quality of paint job indicates the care and quality with which a hot rod was built.
Dropbox on macOS Ventura is Garbage
The thing is, there were two kinds of people clamoring for freedom of speech in support of Musk's takeover: those with genuine concerns, and those who were disingenuous and were mad that Twitter wasn't a safe space for people with certain views. Those in the former camp wanted to restore a balance to Twitter, while those in the latter camp preferred to reshape Twitter in their own political image.

Through his actions, Musk has shown himself to be in the latter camp. Those in the former camp should be just as mad about post-Musk Twitter as they were about pre-Musk Twitter. Problem is I don't see many people (here on HN at least) saying "Wow, I thought Musk would fix Twitter but this is not what I expected when he said he supported free speech!" To me, that shows maybe a lot of people were in the latter camp all along, and are pleased things are working out just as they expected.
Nice share!