skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Freedom of speech does not mean freedom of consequences.

Actually, the freedom is freedom from consequences (other than speech in return or being listened to or not).
> , is sickeningly anti-woman.

Some people argue that prostitution is sickeningly anti-_women_ .

> It suggests women do not have agency and cannot make their own choices.

That's the "liberal" ideology, everything is a merchandise including people's body, as long as there is some form of "consent". Obviously consent can be fabricated (grooming, proxenetism, ...) before the prostitute realizes that they've been sexually exploited and abused. In Europe there is that grooming phenomenon where young girls, often minors are emotionally manipulated by their (older) boyfriend and then asked to prostitute themselves for "love" or just hooked to hard drugs to make them more docile. Obviously there is the question of emotional maturity when it comes to consent.

Liberals aren't concern by the psychological taul of prostitution, and its social consequences, only by perpetuating sex as a product like toothpaste or a bigmac ...
Hubpage reviewers publish it without detecting it was an ai generated content
Often on such artefacts they use "I" to refer to the thing itself, but it appears that the author did not do that here?

I wonder if it says something about how comfortable they were with writing: how strange was it to them that you could make a lifeless thing "speak", and carry words? The stranger it was to them, I would think, the more they might think of it as magical and let the item speak in an "I" voice.

Maybe there are some parallels to that in how we make large language models talk to us. We feel it as something unsettling and almost magical that we can make the models talk to us as if they were people, but when you think about it, objects carrying words on their own at all was an even bigger leap.
Previous poster said that GPT is to writing what calculators are to math. That's an interesting point, is this an analogy we can reason with?

My terse response was "no, because calculators are correct all the time whereas GPT is incorrect a lot of time". So, that reasoning can't be used. Need a different one.

So we conclude, no that's not a good analogy.
It computed the division correctly with almost three digits of accuracy. This isn't completely wrong. I don't personally know how ChatGPT goes about doing division of two integers, but I would be surprised if it had somehow how managed to encode a correct algorithm for integer division which could be carried out to arbitrary precision. But I do know that the weights in NNs are usually found using numerical optimization with quite a large residual---typically on the order of 1%. Maybe there is some connection here.
rustc got bootstrapped already, so download it. If you want to run the compiler itself on a new architecture, cross-compile. If you still decide to bootstrap it again, that's something that will only need to be done once. And even in that case, you can use the second implementation that already exists, mrustc.
Fixed! It should only ask for publicly available data now
No chance. Elon's incompetence is vital to my worldview.
It's worth considering a composable commerce SaaS. Many let you pick and choose the pieces you need, so you can fill out the remaining components and only replace what you built if their version brings significant value.

At this point, the answer is always buy and then build later if necessary. Just as we once questioned building a server vs using the cloud, using pre-built flexible components gets you to market faster.

Just be careful as the market right now has many monoliths and old systems claiming to be "headless" and "composable", but in reality Magento, Salesforce, Oracle, etc. are all expensive to work with and should only be considered for basic needs.

Looking at a marketplace you can consider marketplace specific vendors like mirakl and convictional, but being niche they can be very expensive. I would instead look at composable commerce solutions that are very flexible and can meet your marketplace needs.
> We need competition. I'm not using (even avoiding) LLVM based toolchains, and not touching Rust even with a 100 foot pole because of that.

I'm interested in this. Could you elaborate on why you are not using Rust? Because there is no competition in the language, or because there is not an alternate compiler, or because you don't like LLVM?
Game Gear Games on Master System (and Vice Versa)
So in order to use rust you also have to become a compiler developer?
> Law enforcement should have the right to pursue people posting illegal content in real life

It's not the 90s cyberpunk era any more. The internet is real life.
I'll tale one of those Gepard AA tanks, once Ukraine doesn't need them anymore. You can drive one those to Walmart for weekly groccery shopping! And you propably din't need a concealed carry liscence.

Edit: I once saw people live firing WW2 anti-tank artillery somewhere in Nevada or some similar, desert-ish place. So, if a modern Gepard is out of the question, maybe a WW2 8.8 flak cannon would qualify as a historical collection piece?
Quite the opposite. I got covid in march 2020 and since then I have mostly WFH, and been careful about masking with efficient gear (N95 and up) indoors, and I have not gotten sick once, whereas previously I would be out one or two times a year for a week each at least.

I do have a perpetual runny nose and some coughing from time to time, but nothing that would qualify as an illness (and I had that before 2020 as well, possibly thanks to inhaling too much tear gas years ago).
I guess they also don't want to blow up random civilians by accident again.

When castle bravo was tested, we didn't knew that lithium7 fusion was possible and that it would generate energy. The bomb had a lot of lithium7 because it was cheaper than lithium6. Castle Bravo then proceeded to explode with way more power than intended, it vaporized the measurement instruments, ruined the test site, damaged civilian property and caused a horrible amount of fallout that screwed a enormous amount of people from more than one country.

Even during war, I suppose you want your explosions to behave in the way you expect... so you need to figure out all the physics related to them.
Because he's far more likely to be evading regulation and authorities than just being a digital nomad.

Would you trust a bank with your money that has no HQ and the CEO/founder is no where near any legal jurisdiction?
I've never quite bought this law. Trafficking was already illegal. Pimping too. The only effect this law appears to have had is that prostitution moved below ground.
Of course they can, no one is arguing against that. The point here is the hypocrisy of Elon Musk positioning himself as a defender of free speech, saying that they would not ban this account and then doing exactly what he said that wouldn't happen
It's very likely filtered out of the FR24 data. Use https://globe.adsbexchange.com instead and you will get everything, including Elon's jet.
Waiting to find out more details is antithetical to the internet outrage machine.
Well, now they pay 0% so I don't think you need to worry about the other extreme yet....
I do think billionares are undertaxed, but mostly because they can easily get around the tax system itself. The personal wealth comparison seems flawed though because it's treating wealth as if it's just bank accounts of cash and we're discussing how much everyone has to spend on consumption. But at even millionaire levels of wealth most of it is in real estate and ownership of companies. And at that point disallowing certain levels of wealth just means you can't have your business grow above a certain size and still keep it, or keep your family's real estate if the market has grown substantially around you. Fixing the tax system either at the base or with a progressive wealth tax as a hack on top may be a better solution.
What? Why?

You can’t run a business like that for very long. 1-2 years max. Then all the law suits will eat you up.

Deliberately not paying may lead to criminal charges too.
You probably dodged a bullet
The Problem with How Gartner Makes Its Money
> How is this different then doxing?

Because it's public information that's literally broadcast to anyone listening by every aircraft above a certain size/speed. This isn't information that is considered secret or even that one needs to dig to expose, the aircraft is actively transmitting regular messages containing its location, heading, and speed to anyone within radio range which can be tens or hundreds of miles depending on altitude.
The Web Archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20221213074257/twitter.com/elonje...
They showed a few (all prominent Republicans), but mostly unsurprising ones. I really want to know what fraction of accounts end up automatically being de-amplified.
> but doesn't actually understand how anything works

I'm struggling to comprehend how an AI could ever truly achieve this.
You're talking about equality of opportunity (which is treating everyone equally) Vs equality of outcome (which is treating people unequally to engineer an outcome.

Why not just say, 'I don't believe in treating everyone equally"? If you have a different position then say so. Why try and redefine things? What's the goal?
Low-Wage Workers Are Older Than You Think
The "No Fly" list is an IRL example, people who were erroneously on the list had no idea until they tried to take a flight and finding out why and getting it fixed is a nightmare.
I'm just guessing here, but I assume Musk realised what Trump did some years ago:

> “I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose any voters,” he said.

A large percentage of Musk's followers are devoted to him and to whatever he says his cause is on any given day. He can move the goalposts and they'll cheer him for it.
It's really hard to parse what you're writing without sentences (there are at least six sentences in your paragraph, but nothing to mark their boundaries) and capital letters.
Yes. You're right. And I still think it's a bit easier in the short term to implement worker protection than a worldwide anti-capitalist revolution.
> If you want to see what you should never do as a software engineer if you like not being in jail, this is it.

Not quite the same level, but in my early days working on a payment system, a request from the product team was to create a summary screen where customer service reps could see payment histories AND THE CC INFORMATION USED FOR THE PAYMENTS. In my mind, there was no way that would end well, so I strenuously objected and had to endure some very heated conversations over the course of a month or two. Eventually product team agreed to last 4 digits + expiration.

Nowadays it wouldn't even be a conversation, but in the early 2000's, it was a different world.
Back in the day, I would prototype in python and code in C. Maybe now I should try prototyping in an idiolectal golflang and coding in python?
> Maybe we should actually find out what the account has posted recently first?

Yes, because Elon has certainly earned all the benefit of the doubt.

Also, what did "we" find?
You are thinking too narrowly.

Everyone dies of something - you don't save lives, you delay death.

The older people are the more likely they will have multiple chronic things to be treated - diabetes, arthritis etc .

This is one of the challenges that society hasn't quite got to grips with yet - and it's why health care costs are climbing ever upwards.
Musk claimed a record of 20,000 of tweets per second recently [1]. How does that square with what you’re saying? 300 times 450 is closer to 150,000. Am I missing something?

[1]https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1595505413113323520?s=20...
I don't think it's getting worse, you're just becoming more aware of its limitations.

It's not a knowledge engine. It's a machine learning application with a language model.

It "knows" what the answers should look like and it can infer the correct answer from context some of the time but it doesn't actually know any facts and can't reason about them. That's also not what it was designed for.

People fawning over its surprisingly plausible results remind me a bit of people fawning over the photorealistic quality of Toy Story or Half-Life upon release. Yes, they're technical marvels of their time but just because they're a lot closer to "the real thing" that doesn't mean they're indistinguishable.

And with AI in particular there is currently a hype that seems to be at least in part a result of a shift from cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology to AI as the new VC buzzword but bringing with it similarly fantastical (read: unrealistic) claims and predictions. "General AI" (i.e. human-level intelligence) has always been 20 years in the future. Even as far back as in the 1960s. We're getting ever better at the 80% solution but the remaining 20% continue being unsolvable outside pitch decks and overexcited influencer claims.
GNU grep recently migrated to PCRE2. My GNU grep is linked to PCRE2:

$ grep --version | head -n2
grep (GNU grep) 3.8
Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
$ ldd /usr/bin/grep
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffd2ddd5000)
libpcre2-8.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpcre2-8.so.0 (0x00007f4f88b81000)
libc.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007f4f8899a000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f4f88c6f000)

As for pcre2grep, Archlinux includes it as part of the pcre2 package:

$ pacman -Qo $(which pcre2grep)
/usr/bin/pcre2grep is owned by pcre2 10.40-3

So this is a distro packaging thing. But what I said is true: pcregrep, pcre2grep and grep -P are all distinct things.
> SEPA transfers take 30 seconds to clear.

not entirely true, there are several countries in europe in which a SEPA transfer is shown in the beneficiary the next day, the most famous one being Italy.
Italy also being the one with specific laws against mafia and terrorism, therefore such transfer would require you to add some additional papers.

> > thats the safest transaction for both sides
> that's literally the less safe!

well so it's a bank transfer because once the money has been sent you cannot get it back, the bank acts only on specific cases.

there's literally a million of cases of scams via ebay or similar that involved bank transfers and for which the bank was just "sorry".

> If you are buying something worth more than 10k and you need it now, something's obviously not right.

you are confusing "out of the ordinary" with "not right" and i'd like to remind you our legal systems in EU are still based on "innocent until proven guilty" principle.
not different from a celebrity doing a planned appearance
Asked it for something similar inspired by your comment:

> give example of name for private car pool app

One possible name for a private carpool app could be "MyCarpool". This name emphasizes the personalized and private nature of the app, as well as its focus on carpooling as a means of transportation. Other possible names could include "PrivateRide", "CarpoolConnect", or "RideSharePlus".

> I just want it to be one word

In that case, a possible name for a private carpool app could be "Carpoolio", which combines the words "carpool" and "io" (a popular suffix for tech-related names) into a single word. Other one-word options could include "Carpoolize", "Ridepool", or "Carpoolify".

> polio is a disease so I don't think it's a good suggestion. Carpoolize sound like monopolize. The other are good.

You are correct that "polio" is a disease, so using it in the name of a carpool app might not be the best idea. "Carpoolize" does have a similar sound to "monopolize", which might not be ideal for a carpool app that is focused on sharing rides and reducing the number of single-occupancy vehicles on the road.

I think this was quite impressive.
They can't block a customer-premises recursive resolver. But the SNI is on the TCP connection, not the DNS request; if you have that sort of ISP, they can filter based on SNI.
Well yes, the people writing prostitution laws tend to fail to even consider the existence of male prostitutes.
I've kept a daily log of my health, work, activity, etc. since 2010 and was curious about this too. No change at all for me over the past 12 years. I get some kind of mild cold once a year and a major flu-like sickness every 3 years or so. For what it's worth, I personally stopped wearing a mask in May 2021 after getting the covid vaccine. I did not get any covid boosters, but I do get a flu shot each season. Anecdotally, I seem to have not seen any uptick or downturn in my rate of illness, but this season isn't over.
There's a pretty big difference between prostitution and other shitty jobs from mental health perspective.
Demo:

- https://20b.eleuther.ai/

Related system/hardware requirements:

- https://nlpcloud.com/deploying-gpt-neox-20-production-focus-...

Benchmarks of GPT-NeoX-20B vs GPT-3 DaVinci:

- https://the-decoder.com/gpt-3-alternative-eleutherai-release...

GitHub Download:

- https://github.com/EleutherAI/gpt-neox
I think the rubicon was crossed when the acquirer insinuated that an executive who went to bat for him was a pedophile. The executive has had to go into hiding.

There are lines that we shouldn’t cross in a civil society. Supporting blood libel adjacent claims is at the top of the list.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/dy79wm/elon-musk-yoel-roth-t...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/12/12/musk-tw...
> I don't want to be able compile some source only with "rustc-v_ancient-company_name-internal_fork-no_you_cant_have_its_source" version.

Yeah, it's not like Google (and dozens of others) has/have an internal fork of Linux, which never gets merged back. I'm not certain the GPL butters any parsnips here.

> Hence, I'd rather have multiple compatible, yet independently implemented compilers, per language.

You identified it. The problem is compatibility, and again Linux is a good negative example where ostensibly we have a language spec and multiple compilers, but Linux for years would only compile on one compiler.

Multiple compilers and "competition" doesn't solve compatibility. It makes it more difficult. Although I'm sure there will be benefits, I'm not certain the GPL/GCC will make compatibility any easier. It hasn't so far.
Canada also uses the Nordic model.
Well, if you physically ask it "Can you do math", it states that it can - maybe purely from a hypothetical perspective and not actual calculations.

"Yes, I can do math. I am a large language model trained by OpenAI, so I have a lot of knowledge about many different topics, including math. Is there a specific math problem you would like me to help you with?"

Of course you can read that many ways and I think you're right in it means it can regurgitate the theory but not the answers.
Check out Tabnine - they seek to achieve the same thing as Copilot, and they have been around for longer.
For bugs see:
https://open-web-advocacy.org/walled-gardens-report/#ios-saf...

And

https://open-web-advocacy.org/walled-gardens-report/#evidenc...

Make sure you tap more comments to see the examples.

The number one issue for building native like apps is this https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/84

It has been buggy for as long as I can remember and never been fixed.

Not to mention the 10 years of issues with indexeddb or the issues with WebRTC.
From your link:

>"Sweeney, a first-year student at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, says he uses publicly available transponder data from Musk’s private plane to track its location. That data, which includes the plane’s altitude, latitude, longitude, and heading are then fed into an algorithm he created. The @ElonJet bot then takes that information and Tweets out when Musk takes off and lands."

I hope that this individual makes his bot code publicly available so that others can just keep putting up @elonjet clones on Twitter and elsewhere. This could so easily be put up again somewhere else outside of Twitter. I think a Kickstarter campaign for a site called something like "Free Speech Jet" would likely be very successful just on principle alone.
I am not skeptical of human caused global warming in the least but I am hugely skeptical of our ability to coordinate and solve a problem even a 1/10th as complex.

I would never express this to a pollster though as I don't want to be lumped in with crazy climate deniers and this isn't exactly a nuanced topic.
Code is law, until an actual law enforcement entity takes an interest in you.
The Woman Who Made Online Dating into a ‘Science’
Uhm.....you don't? With my provider here in UK(GiffGaff) I had to send them the digits from my passport to have "adult" content unlocked on my sim, it's all blocked by default otherwise. There are several other types of ID you can use for this.
Hah! I was asked to join this multiple times and I refused because they do an FBI background check. Not that I have anything to hide, employers already do a background check but I didn't like volunteering to let the government be part of the equation as part of my day to day stuff and I hear they dig around quite a bit. Other similar orgs vet by simply asking someone at your org to vouch for you (a popular example is virustotal).

In europe these orgs are -CERT and in the US they are -ISAC for those who don't know (industry specific intel sharing) but Infragard is all encompassing as an org to share intel between FBI and private sector.

I can't imagine it would be much use. Targeted phishing maybe using this list? But then again people on the list are the most likely folks to be best trained and aware against phishing. On the other hand they would alsobe likely to have privileged accounts at their org.

I don't think the breach is a big deal other than showing a weakness in the FBIs vetting process.
If you put it like that there's freedom of speech everywhere, it just so happens that in some places talking gets you killed...
> Day to day citizens won’t care and would probably get behind it

In coastal cities, sure. Beyond that, most people understand the cost of a Prohibition-style war on private wealth.
>I don't want to be able compile some source only with "rustc-v_ancient-company_name-internal_fork-no_you_cant_have_its_source" version.

I dont think it is valid concern in $currentYear

Nowadays languages like e.g c# are partially created by community and foundations (.net foundation) on github

So not only isnt it fully tied to company, but also it is oss.

>Hence, I'd rather have multiple compatible, yet independently implemented compilers, per language.

I dont because it permanently decreases developer experience and the value added is not something that could not be achieved with single compiler

I mean if you see room for improvement then go ahead and make PR instead of creating yet another compiler with its own bugs, quirks and wtfs
A stalker doesn't need @elonjet. They can just go to https://globe.adsbexchange.com/.
I know that XML is extensible, but my impression was that RSS and Atom are not (hence why Atom superseeded RSS) but looking at the specs it looks like they might allow for some improvement.
How sad should I be about ChatGPT?