skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The myriad of flight tracking websites are not in violation of any doxxing rules whatsoever. There is no dissemination of public records other than replaying info as-is.

The existence of these automated tracking accounts have no effect on Elon's personal safety because any hypothetical bad actor would not need to depend on this singular account on a singular platform to obtain such information.
You're 100% correct. People will want FSD for themselves for sure. That won't stop them from blaming the tech companies when they read articles about the cars killing people. Ralph Nader's _Unsafe At Any Speed_ tanked Corvair sales after publication, although his critiques arguably applied to other cars more than the Corvair. The sales of other, similar contemporary cars weren't affected at all.

FSD will be incredibly convenient, which means humans will always be motivated to come up a reason, valid or otherwise, that justifies their own use of the tech while allowing themselves to condemn others for mishaps incurred doing the exact same thing.

"They didn't maintain it correctly." "They didn't listen to the warnings." "They bought the wrong brand." "They weren't current on software updates."
>it raised my eyebrows that the author simply asserted conspiratorial knowledge of the intentions for its creation.

it's not describing a conspiracy, it's describing a mindset/culture.

check the twitter feeds of the AI boosters. they're revelling in making people feel afraid and worthless.

example: this whole thread: https://twitter.com/realGeorgeHotz/status/160178671271525171...
Compared to some of the confessions he has made in other interviews, I don't think anything here is too bad.

Regarding the "I fucked up" line, I'm not sure that is damaging at all (except possibly the tone; who knows how that will play with a jury).

His lawyers may intend to argue that he was merely made mistakes, and therefore had no intent to defraud anyone.
I think author is becoming nihilist himself after seeing the progress of the AI. And this is his attempt to stop/delay AI technology so he can feel good again. Otherwise he would not have written such a text. Latest AI technology really make us think who we really are.
Yeah, and highest margin by far in the auto industry. While growing 50% per year.
Umm, except the cars the average joe buys depreciate in value, while the supercars the rich buy usually apreciate in value, kind of like art, so wouldn't it make more sense that panel gaps are more important for that market?

Does having tighter panel gaps help with the resale value for the average joes?
It even has a "readers added additional context" note below it now, lol.
That's part of their mandates.
It's funny (kind of cute, honestly) that these site operators pretended that the outbound (booting) side of the service was the only legal risk, and that they could address this with click-through terms. Clearly, compromising third-party devices and services, or misusing services for amplification, is just as legally fraught as the attack itself.

That being said, I wonder if these services are actually the limiting factor here. There is probably some zero-sum game here, with a fixed quantity of exploitable booter hosts available and all the providers vying for control of these. Shutting down a set of providers would then just make others more powerful.
SBF said so but there is no public evidence of it, so far as I can tell. The federal government brought a charge against SBF due to his campaign contributions, so it can perhaps be expected that we will learn more about those contributions as this saga plays out.
Is there any economy that you are aware of that had high wage inflation without inflation in everything else? Wage inflation alone would be great for the average worker, but wage inflation plus equal general inflation is at best a wash, and much worse for retirees who can't take advantage of those rising wages.
If you are billionare and buy private jet you're obliged to share it's location by law.

Dont want to share your current location? Dont use private jet.
Buying a Gaming Monitor? OLED Is the Best Choice
This is one of the few posts I've seen touch on the question of: is there a pragmatic reason Elon would want to see a Republican or even "Trumpist" government.

In other words: does he actually care about any of that culture war shit or is it just about big contracts?
The censorship never stopped. It was happening before Musk assumed his position, while he was getting settled in, and is continuing now. Twitter is a censorious platform, and its organizational and technical structure is very much conducive to this situation; nor could you reasonably expect someone like Mr. Musk to invest a lot of effort to change this.
I feel the same way about my Subaru's EyeSight system. It helps me stay in the lane, and annoys me if I get distracted and cross a line. It slows down the car automatically when it detects an obstacle ahead. It speeds up and slows down automatically to maintain a mostly-steady speed when I set cruise control.

Until autonomous vehicles reach "read a book or fall asleep" levels, this is all I'm interested in. No thank you to any dumb "autopilot" system that I can't actually trust, but tries to control my wheel.
>That's a lot of hate and presumptions to assume about one person

There is no assumption. It's based on the things he's said and done

>And Elon is most definitely not a conservative.

Yes he is.

>He has stated he voted democrat his whole life.

His word means nothing, but regardless, you can be conservative and vote Democrat. The Democrat party is for the most part the republican party with less bigotry.

>His support for republicans is only recent and says he is not against voting democrat sometime in the future.

His support for the GOP comes when they tried to overthrow the government and have installed a far-right religious fanatic majority on the highest court in the land? Yeah, he's conservative.
> You can use the swap data attribute to update several fragments (imagine a saved icon) in several places declaratively.

Yeah, but why? The javascript snippet to accomplish the same is absolutely trivial and avoids a dependency.

> The price to pay for this is it does not work offline. For quickly prototyping and app it is very fast.

The true price is that you've now rewritten your HTML code in a non-standard DSL and are forever dependent on a third party library, and all that to accomplish a goal that seems entirely aesthetic to me.
The JS Foundation oversees the jQuery project as a steward and has it listed as "end of life or near end of life" for jQuery UI. I'd suggest for bug fixes & security updates to quite likely look elsewhere

[0]: https://openjsf.org/projects/
It can exist so long as the middle class still have wealth to plunder, which is the real point of financializing housing. These distortions will be maintained so long as they serve that purpose. With millennials and later generations being largely unable to build wealth the middle class is on its way to being tapped out.
I suspect that the issue is with cars being so cautious that they just stop as people keep walking, or at best herky jerky move fwd. In NYC, a car like that wouldn't get anywhere as the pedestrians just won't stop. the pedestrians stop when they see that the driver isn't going to stop and they gonna get hit.
Maybe I am missing something but Dropwizard is not a framework on its own but instead of collection of external and independently developed libraries
I think you missed OPs point.

As I understand it, Waymo can’t drive on unmapped roads, and therefore there are no comparable videos of Waymo actually doing that.

You chose a Waymo video from their marketing channel, and a newspaper hit piece. And then questioned sincerity of OP…
It is (https://www.fcc.gov/general/cell-phone-unlocking).

The kind of unlocking at issue in this case refers to a) unlocking phones that a customer owes a balance for or b) unblocking stolen phones (which are blacklisted by carriers to deter theft).
We're going to need a year of price stability before confidence comes back. It probably will not take much to get prices going up again.
One day I'll get around to finish my library Azul [1]. Hopefully.

[1] https://azul.rs/
ElonJet is unbanned on all other platforms. So, no, you couldn't be more wrong.
> Well, sucks for you.

Yes. So you get why some of us aren't thrilled about all this.
> it's easy to confuse this lack of a filter for honesty

This is actually one of the bigger problems with discourse and politics today: the idea that "rude, crude, and unconcerned with other people's feelings" has anything to do with honesty—and, conversely, that being sensitive to those feelings and trying to take them into account when speaking is dishonest as opposed to kind.
Yeah. Imagine the risk that would be for them, if it caused evidence to be lost.

There's nothing to gain, and everything to lose. Even if there's minimal chance of anything being there, the mere perception that evidence could have been lost would be damning.
It's true that there is nonzero engineering effort to make some of these things happen, but in my opinion, a lot of the problem is self-inflicted. I mean... Apple also eventually decided to support third-party keyboards. Was it a bit buggy? Absolutely. Did it obliterate quick type and make all typing buggy for all users? No. As far as I can guess, they actually special-cased third party keyboards. Fine by me. Probably fine by regulators as long as there's nothing malicious about it.

Truth be told, I don't care about alternate voice assistants. That said, today, you can get almost all of Google Assistant on an iPhone just fine, the only thing it really can't do is well, respond to your voice passively and do things on the lock screen. Exactly how much power they're willing to expose I'm not sure, but it doesn't really seem like they have to give everyone access to the same internal APIs they use so as long as the APIs they provide give enough feature parity.

I think the sky is not falling.
Really we need to start changing terminology. A great deal of these deaths are not overdoses in the sense that people took too much of a drug but poisonings in that people took something they did not intend to take. It might seem like a minor detail, but if helps drive home the point that even users who do not take opiods are at risk, it is worth doing.
I'm confused, how does this move affect Google's ability to promote their own iOS Chrome app to Safari iOS users? They already have that ability.
and this could have been written by ctrl-v.
If it's Doxxing, why haven't charges been filed under the Interstate Doxxing Prevention Act:
https://projects.propublica.org/represent/bills/114/hr6478
Related ongoing threads:

ElonJet Is Now Suspended - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33983878 - Dec 2022 (1116 comments)

ElonJet – Account Suspended - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33981691 - Dec 2022 (385 comments)
It’s possible for him to personally be right-leaning and also fairly enforce apolitical rules on his platform, it just doesn’t seem like he’s doing it.
>>So the stacked Supreme Court issuing absurd rulings is not actually corrupt, but just appears corrupt?

People ruling against what you want is not corruption.
What rules did he violate?
I think you're watching this through Musk colored glasses, it's also telling that you call rich powerful white men a marginalised group.

It's also not that he only banned the elonjet account. He banned the accounts of people posting the video that showed him being booed in SF, he banned several left leaning journalist accounts after a campaign from alt right groups [1]. It really just shows the hipocrasy, and many people are taking note.

[1] https://theintercept.com/2022/11/29/elon-musk-twitter-andy-n...
It is 'fake' in a way - you don't truly want to make/join these communities or post about this on twitter/reddit. If these communities really interested you, you'd already be a part of them. There are communities where the people have known each other for years and you're going to step into their forum, make your one post, annoy them, and move on. I personally wouldn't want to be that guy, but this is just what marketing is.
I screwed around for hours trying to get my first JS fetch code implemented recently.

I found HTMX a few months after, and had it doing AJAX in probably 10 minutes. It has been unbelievably easy to use and helpful.
> Fed has been open about the fact that it intends to slow productivity itself

Source?

More productivity is always good as it promotes growth while fighting inflation (similar number of dollars chasing more goods).
There’s no subrogation for life insurance.
A big company being responsible for a crash is best case scenario. You would much rather sue Mercedes than Joe Shmoe for an accident, no doubt. They've got deep pockets, and your local courts are not particularly friendly to them
you might like web components. Their main communication mechanism is leveraging custom events
The inverted exponential distribution of BTC is far far far more unethical and harmful than anything the fed has ever done with respect to monetary policy.
Why you should have a TECHNICALDEBT.md in your repo
Cargo is not universal. Many projects use rustc directly with an alternative build system such as bazel, make, or meson as they are in multilingual repos. The fact these projects exist doesn't affect your experience with rust. The fact a gcc tool chain for rust will exist should similarly not affect your experience.
Dynamic DNS with wireguard works great, especially for a small footprint (sounds like you only have one LAN you want to access remotely, not multiple sites). It'll be free, and you won't have any cloud centralized service you're dependant on.

Personally I host both of these services (dynamic DNS client, wireguard server) right on my WAN edge router, but you could also run it on a host (e.g., VM or raspberry pi) inside the LAN.
This is my view as well. (I did self-driving related research, like platooning and taxi scheduling/allocation.) Waymo, Baidu, Didi, and others are the names that come to mind for places that produce research, produce data, and apply their technology in real-world practice.

My impression of Tesla is mostly shaped from (1) nonparticipation in the research community, (2) a very early "mission accomplished" declaration by calling their cars fully self driving, and (3) a longterm refusal to use LIDAR.

I don't consider Tesla a player in self-driving (edit: self-driving research), but I don't think Tesla does either. There's no reason for them to try to "win" the space.

From Tesla's side, it makes more sense to continue on their current tack: Applying results from existing research. I think Tesla's strategy is to be the highest bidder when it comes time for Waymo (or Didi, etc) to sell their tech.
Back when I was a teenager I used to come across these sites all the time when playing with Skype-to-IP revolvers. I just checked, and I'm surprised Google actually still shows these sites when you search for them. Most of them have partner links to these DDoS sites, many of which are on this list of takedowns.
I'm not ... but...

So which is it?
> Able Archer

And shortly before that started, Stanislav Petrov[1] saved us by using common sense to not press the button.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Soviet_nuclear_false_alar...
After trying a few, I like this one a lot.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07NW44F6Q/
Meta terminates contractor for Danish data centers, kills expansion project
And the point is that this line of thinking introduces a metric crap ton of unnecessary complexity downstream.

Yeah, an FS could say that¹. Alternatively, it could say that names are intended to be read by humans, and that names should be a single line, to support things that people reasonable expect to be able to do with a file system, like being able to list the files on the filesystem, without whatever is doing the listing needing to decide if it is going to just say "I can't display raw bytes, obviously, so here's a best-effort of ���.txt" or if it has to invent some sort of grammar to encode/escape bytes into text.

I.e., a file system is meant to solve a problem, which is the storage and organization of data, and from that, that names are meant to used by humans is one of the requirements of both the OS & the filesystem. (The OS, as it presents the file hierarchy to userspace, e.g., in the VFS, and the filesystem, as it of course needs to store the data.)

By your logic, we should permit nul and '/' in file names, too.

¹and, I mean, most do. Which is why we're in the situation we're in, and why languages are faced with a barrel of bad choices, and why probably 90% of shell scripts fail to properly handle file names. Is this what we want?
You got down-voted, but I think you're onto something.

The last couple of weeks/months of Elon to me are just another instance of a much-replicated "no fact-checking required for popularity" pattern. It turns out it never was, we just didn't have the sort of media immediacy that made it an issue at scale before.

We need more general tools to deal with these cases.
I've personally noticed that a lot of FBI agents mentioned in the news have generic or "ungoogleable" names, often with "two first names" like "Max Ryan" or "Jessica Claire" (both fictional examples).

I just assume these are aliases given to new employees at the bureau.
Look everywhere else: heavy promotion on some of the most popular web properties in the world (Google Search, Gmail, YouTube, etc.) has put Firefox into a death-spiral and Microsoft gave up on their own engine in favor of a Chrome derivative. There is little reason to believe that the same would not be true on iOS were it possible for Google to get users to switch.

I think that matters because while Chrome has a number of great engineers, it's a single team at one company and the web should be bigger than that. We've seen many examples of a Google-proposed spec which became better with feedback from Mozilla or Apple engineers, and that makes the web healthier overall. One really interesting example here has been with tracking where every browser which Google does not control has a better privacy stance because none of those companies make their money by tracking people.
Time is ordered so that things happen after other things.

So first @ElonJet appeared to be shadow-banned or visibility-filtered.
Then @JxckSweeney commented on that.
Then it appeared that @ElonJet was back to normal.
Then @JxckSweeney commented on that. *THIS* is what you linked to, from Dec 12, two days ago.
Then today, two days later, @ElonJet was suspended.
Then you posted your comment, apparently missing the passage of time from Dec 12 to Dec 14.
Then also today, @JxckSweeney was suspended.

I hope that brings everyone up to date.
> "Molding the economy to their will"

The thing to remember about central banking is that it's a relatively immature art, not science, and its practitioners are still refining the toolset. As a kid, I think one grows up just assuming they know what they're doing and that it's a pretty solid practice, but not so. You see them molding the economy to their will, but I see a bunch of people with gritted teeth and high blood pressure reactively trying to steer an out-of-control stagecoach whose horses are running at full tilt with their manes on fire down a country road with blind turns, giving it their all to keep it from crashing violently. They apply lessons learned but I think that every major economic event is still largely an experiment, and occasionally they still make the wrong moves leading to a need to apply harsh corrections.

Give it another 100 years and maybe all the permutations will have been seen and the solution sets known, but it's a terribly complex beast, complicated by radically higher global entanglement in the prior 50 years. The question is, is it better than the alternatives. I think if expectations are realistically low, it is better to have some knobs and dials that you can monkey with to try and control speed and direction.

Just my .02 (which is seemingly worth less each day).
The argument is that I could learn Spring in 2002, find a Job
then I could learn Spring in 2008 and find a job
and then I could learn Spring in 2013 and find a job and
then learn Spring in 2018 and find a job
and then learn Spring in 2023 and find a job.

Spring IS complex, but you learn it once and you are done with it.
It's just a JS library that attaches behavior to HTML elements based on attributes where you'd otherwise have to write a bunch of JS yourself. It's just a framework where all the metadata is just embedded in the HTML.
> Elon didn’t make the data available so we can discount that.

Did you miss the part where this data is legally required to be broadcast openly? This isn't private information, so whether or not Elon wants it to be shared is irrelevant.

> Yes. Sharing information to make people track a person’s movements can be considered abusive.

The account isn't tracking Elon's movements. It's tracking his jet's movements, which again are legally required to be publicly broadcast by the very jet being tracked. Aside from the time he's actually on the jet, the extent that this allows a person to track his movements is "he's probably somewhere within the general region served by whatever airport the plane is at" which is not exactly a significant privacy issue nor unusual for anyone of sufficient celebrity.

He always has the choice to not fly everywhere by private jet, which I believe was the entire original point of this bot. Making a note of the carbon impact of his choice to fly all over while promoting himself as a leader in reducing carbon footprint. There was a whole thing for a while with calling out a variety of celebrities for the same thing, just Elon was the only one who took it personally.

> I suspect this is a mistake though and Musk will have twitter re enable the account.

Given that the head of the company has a known public vendetta against this particular account and it was just the other day publicized that direct Musk subordinates were involved in "shadowbanning" it, and we know for a fact that Twitter has systems to flag accounts for special treatment such as Musk's previous promise to not ban it, this really doesn't pass the smell test.

What's more likely, that after all that they somehow accidentally banned both this account and later the operator's account, or that Musk got angry and changed his mind?
Paul Volcker was widely credited for stopping the rampant high inflation of the 70's. Volcker is one of the greatest Fed chairs around.
Jquery runs existing jquery code, and people who have written jquery code for many years can leverage their expertise and experience.
All I can think of is the semi trucks carrying not just entertainment, but all manner of physical products needed by almost every industry.
It's for building SPAs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-page_application)
The legal system didn't decide anything because it's reactive (i.e. someone has to go after Apple for this to happen and Apple gladly use the fact that no one bothered enough). And in general competition law became so toothless that it's rarely applied even in such glaringly egregious cases.

I don't really care what their motivation for lifting it is. They got away with it for too long causing a lot of very concrete anti-competitive damage to progress of the Web.
Because you don’t have your personal belongings in the taxi, you have to take them in and out. A personal car is a little room, like a little part of your home, that you bring with you when you travel. With kids especially (diapers, wipes, books, toys, car seats, snacks, a place to change diapers or change clothes or breastfed in privacy or nap, etc… protected from the elements and climate controlled), this is really helpful.
If we are just using words, then another saying "death by a thousand paper cuts" comes to mind.

I think the parent has a point. Not sure I agree, but there are many ways to argue for or against.