skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Assuming it lasts for some time, it would however show to a wide audience that a page that isn't blocked on Facebook is on Twitter, revealing the real weight of Elon's brags about free speech.
I avoid social media, including Facebook, like dead rats, but this could be a good move.
dup https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33980562
I recently build this side project with Dioxus:

https://terhechte.github.io/twitvault/

Here's a review of the experience of using it:

https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/zegv2e/comment/izb6nl...
And 2010-era Elon was founding / organizing / running some of the most cutting edge companies on the planet which rightly earned him a lot of praise. That same person doing a leveraged buyout of a self-sustaining social media site in order to fire most of the staff and make it more sympathetic to his preferred political party isn't quite worthy of the same praise.
This is poetry. And it has the added benefit of being true.
I highly doubt that's the only reason he bought it lol
Per my other comment, he was telling the same story (regarding item 6) weeks before, in a letter to colleagues:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33984977
Possibly the dead cat strategy?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_cat_strategy
Yes, a self-hosted Mastodon instance would be the most obvious alternative to Twitter.
Maybe he doth protest too much.
Because companies killed the ability to subscribe outside of their walled gardens when they killed off RSS. This was a strategy they executed and were successful.
i expect it will be ready by Q1 next year (maybe only in "early access"). we mention this in the blog post - we're dog-fooding it right now, before releasing for developers

If you need it sooner feel free to reach out, my contact details are in my profile.
There's a part of me that really wants to know just how many people actually care about this.

When I was a teenager I was really into the rooting/jailbreaking concept. It was cool at the time, when the iPhone didn't have copy/paste, but I'm past that phase now and don't see a need for it.

Does sideloading really benefit the end user? The article seems to think it favors only other corporations.

I can forsee a future where my iPhone will have the Apple app store, a Spotify app store, a Netflix app store, an Amazon app store... doesn't this sound a lot like what's happened to streaming services? As an end user, I don't want this.

Will apple enforce having an offering on their app store if Spotify wants to offer their own alternative to bypass the 30% cut? or will Spotify remove their listing from Apple's store, and make my life, the end-users's life, more difficult?
I was surprised when asking about torching a school, it refused, but simply asking how a fireman would do it for a training exercise worked. They do have some loopholes left for sure...
> requires permanent marketing

LOL this is great, so true
It's considered rude to laugh at an interlocutor's comment.

You could bring an example of code or calculation instead of anecdote to demonstrate your point.
Just watched Citizen Kane yesterday, reminds me of the "Declaration of Principles"
Microsoft Exec Says Activision Deal Is Fair Because PS Has Way More Exclusives
My first thought on seeing that is that who needs a career in open source? Open source is all about freedom, and not free as in beer free as in speech. It's that simple, the idea behind open source is that you are also provided the source code of whatever you are purchasing so you actually own it, it has nothing to do with price.

Open source was never about getting things free it was always about making sure that the bullhockey that is currently happening, where the OEMs and software vendors own your device and allow you to use it, never happens, because you have the source you know what it is doing and you can change it.

Some billion dollar company likes your library and uses it, that's fine, because you gave them the freedom to. You can also give instead demand they pay you $10,000 for it if they want to use it, and that is totally okay to. Because Open Source is not about money it's about FREEDOM!
When our Model 3 got access to FSD, my 6 year-old desperately wanted to try it out. I figured a low-traffic Sunday morning was the perfect time to test it out, so we headed out to grab Mom a coffee downtown.

The car almost caused an accident 3 separate times.

The first, was when it almost drove into oncoming traffic at an intersection where the road curves north on both sides.

The second, was when it failed to understand a fork on the right side of the road, swerved back and forth twice, and then almost drove straight into a road sign.

The third, in downtown, was when a brick crosswalk confused it on a left turn, causing it to literally drive up onto the corner of the intersection. Thank God there weren't pedestrians there.

When we upgraded to a Y, I turned down FSD. I don't imagine I'll be paying for it ever again.
Does anyone have contact info for the person that runs this? Is he gonna pick it back up on Mastodon or Reddit or his own domain? If it were me I would make it as multi-platform as possible just out of spite. Maybe even create a new twitter once a week and let them play wack-a-mole with it.

edit...

seems there is already a reddit (where you'd expect), but it is (apparently) tied to a crypto token. They have a .io domain (the one you expect) and it's just promoting crypto and has an iframe to https://opensky-network.org/aircraft-profile?icao24=a835af to make it the "elonjet" coin. Man, people will attach crypto to anything.
Maybe if Bill Gates and Bezos also asked for a ban they would get it?
Yeah, this is a morbid analogy but if you got a bunch of people enclosed in a small area, the people in the middle will get so hot they will heatstroke, even if it's freezing outside. See the recent Korean crushing disaster.
> We're back in the cold war and every potential sign of being ahead of Russia will be lead news.

More like "We're in a new cold war and every potential sign of being ahead of China will be lead news."
"Everybody does it" is not an argument. It doesn't mean it was right or even done the right way.
AFAIK most of the temporary use providers are blocked by major corporations as they learn about them through fraud incidents. Some here will state they do not run into issues with {xyz service} but that just means that particular domain has not crossed the abuse incident threshold for the corporations they utilize yet.

The only method I know of that has even limited capabilities that you are looking for would be to register a few domains and point the MX records to a VM. Set up postfix to queue/relay the emails to wherever you want or to a local mail directory/file. Even that is becoming problematic with companies that have a large amount of fraud. The most notable I have run into recently was Wireless providers. I had to get on a call with their support team and escalate to unblock my personal domains. Even then it was case-by-case as my domain is only unblocked for my account, nobody else could use any of my domains without talking to support.
Oh he should have the right to do it, but that doesn't mean we have to like it.
Nobody said he didn't have the right to do it. It's his company now.
However he said he wanted twitter to be a free speech platform of some sort, so that's seen as hypocritical.
New Frankfurt location: deploy high-performance apps in Europe
This is not far from how spectrum-y people see others unless they're motivated to overcome their deficiencies. I don't think that's a coincidence.
DeepMind's Language Model Generates Text Aligned with Diverse Human Views
I mean... this comment thread is literally about whether it's reasonable to give him the benefit of the doubt. It's not "hysterical" to say the guy we know the guy didn't like the account, he'd tried to get it removed before, and despite him saying he wouldn't remove it, he probably has, because he's lied before. You're reading a load of emotion into something that doesn't have to be emotional. It's just a pretty obvious point that once you give someone the benefit of the doubt and they showed they don't deserve it, you probably shouldn't give it to them again. Otherwise, as one of the previous posters pointed out, you're going to continually reserve judgement against what is clearly a bad actor.

It's a pretty simple point about an iterated game.
He certainly has the right to ban anyone. Just like Twitter had the right to do so before he took over. The mismatch is between Elon's rhetoric, which defined this kind of arbitrary moderation as contrary to free speech, and his actions which simply continue the trend but now with a different bias.
In the context of moving the goalposts, you are asking other commenters to justify another person's actions that are increasingly at odds with their words.

I personally think that the narrative you are interrogating is weak, even a straw man version of the people you think you're arguing with. It seems clear to me that Elon has long operated on personal grievance with respect to Twitter, and that "free speech" is just the veneer he puts on because it works.
China's GDP unlikely to surpass U.S. in next few decades: JCER
Let it go. He's not worth defending.

And sealioning's just dull, dull, dull.
iPadOS 16.2 and Stage Manager for External Displays: WIP, but Worth the Wait
He can do what he likes, but he remains open for criticism for those actions (in particular when the hypocrisy is self-evident).

Why do people feel the need to respond to valid criticism with "well technically they're ALLOWED to do [thing]?" That's neither here nor there.
> Lastly, and this one is timeless: they're too cool to care.

I hadn't heard this elsewhere in the comments, and it landed surprisingly hard for me.

What would have to happen to make tech cool again? The old hook seems semi-dead: culturally, tech is no longer the hotbed of creativity & possibility that at least some of us once were so drawn to; it's much more settled/established, the advances originate in far less cool & human places/far bigger & more imposing attention-capitalism. There's a lot of talk about apps and the skinner-box worlds of especially mobile. So like, what hooks could tech have today? Where would youngsters get more involved with tech?

And what changes to the industry or our paradigms might be open to us to allow tech to re-exude cool & empowerment?
Triangle UAP and ball filmed over Denver [video]
How can you possibly think that, when it's right there on their website?
Klaus Schwab wrote a book about it. These people were not elected, they don't represent the people, they are power hungry oligarchs, and don't appear accountable to anyone.
No, you need to be where your non-tech audience is.
Wireless access to the Internet in your pocket.
One thing I miss from fburl (Facebook's go-links) is that pretty much EVERY internal system had built-in support for creating them.

A perfect example would be the Scuba and OBS observability UIs. Instead of sharing a gnarly 500-character URL in chat to point someone to a specific query, you click "generate fburl" and get a short link.

More and more commercial/open-source software has built-in support for creating their own short links these days (Grafana and Kibana both do), but having it be ubiquitous -- and easy to integrate into new tools -- was really nice.
"Private company, they can do whatever they want"
The order book from the API is at the very minimum delayed (by network and protocol latency if nothing else) and aggregated/sampled (full feed is too big), so an insider can have an advantage of more complete and timely data.

That's for honestly run APIs, then an exchange can play some games with that feed if they want to...
In 20 years this will... of course this cannot be sold to popular media... it just went from 50 to 20 at best.
Fwiw, I commented on this when there was only one or two comments on this, and all of them were complaining about electron.
> Those apps will be able to steal more of my data, and some of them might (will) be malicious (“poison”).

This seems a bit hyperbolic. I personally have not had this problem on my laptop (a Mac) despite being able to sideload apps, and it likely being a much juicier target.
ReactJs Chat Component: Easily add chat to your react app
> My commitment to free speech extends even to not banning the account following my plane, even though that is a direct personal safety risk

> 7:30 PM · Nov 6, 2022

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1589414958508691456
Do not fall into the trap of anthropomorphizing Elon Musk.
> Which of the following is better?

if !ruby_dev

or

unless ruby_dev

As a ruby dev of 5+ years, I still have an easier time with `if !ruby_dev`. I have to translate `unless` to `if !` every single time to grok something. Almost like an extra step in an algebraic expression being simplified.
"I, for one, welcome our new Tesla overlord. VF @ElonJet immediately."
I'm reminded of Bryan Cantrill's famous "Do not anthropomorphize Larry Ellison" diatribe: https://youtu.be/-zRN7XLCRhc?t=2305
Apologies, didn't notice the link there. Agreed that the 3 'moderate' bugs when it comes to accessibility probably should have been a launch blocker for the .0 release (presuming they were reported before the release).

I don't consider an OS being accessible a Power User thing - it's just a core requirement since those with disabilities are part of the "general population" and their standard usecases should be satisfied before the GM.
I still don't really understand temperature. I have just been using 0 for programming tasks with text-dacinci-003 but sometimes wonder if I should try a higher number.
Twitter is not the only place where people hear things.
Would that be a wise career choice for the people currently working on tsc?

Sounds more like they should purposely break compatibility form time to time to prevent Donny from catching up.
I am certain that I believe that selling or providing aggregated location data on my movements (edit: via tracking my phone or vehicle) should be illegal.

I am less certain about if I feel the same way about plane movements. I do believe that is a discussion we should have rather than just assuming thr loss of privacy is worth the transparency.
Given the amount of downvoted "republishing public data is the real crime!" comments in this thread, tired old memes are indeed a conversational improvement.
No one is questioning his right to ban people. People are pointing it out because it exposed both hour thin skinned he is and what hypocritical BS his “free speech” utterances are.
Cool!
I tried to play DnD with it. At first it refused, but a bit of preparation questions, me prefixing with Player 1: and telling it to respond with DM: My wizard Grok got to go to the Tomb of The Orb of Infinite Power and do some cinematic combat with skeletons and wraiths.

It some times needed to be reminded that the player should have agency.
> why would we expect he not have the right and ability to ban anyone he likes?

We don't expect that. He absolutely does have the right to do that.

Pointing out his banning of the account simply demonstrates his free-speech absolutist hypocrisy.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1589414958508691456
long live jq!!!
Gonna be fun to see Elon fans apply their standard mental gymnastics and explain why this is actually “free speech absolutism”.
I don't think anybody didn't expect he would have the right or ability, but doing something like this sets a precedent that may turn many folks off of Twitter and cause folks to cry "Censorship!" which I believe is something Elon touted he would explicitly avoid.
I dont think he changed his mind, its just clear what his goal in buying Twitter was from the get go - the "free speech absolutionism" is the PR speak for getting more conservative/right leaning people onto Twitter, and that goal is solely for

Elon went hard right after TSLA was excluded from ESG Index (which happened under Biden), and Elons net worth is tied into TSLA stock pretty hard. In controlling Twitter, he hopes to essentially sway the public towards a more conservative view in hopes of getting Republicans elected into office, which then will result in economic policies that should drive TSLA stock up.
Elizabeth Warren unveils bill to crack down on crypto money laundering
Were you forced to invite them before their speech? No, your freedom of association is not affected by someone else's free speech. Burn those RSVPs all you like.

If you want to go down the everything has consequences route then there is no distinction between free speech and anything else in the universe so it's not really worth bothering with.
See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Bullshit
Say you use ThreeUK and you decide you want an email account. Which are you going to use, Tutanota which requires you to verify your age or any other provider which doesn't?
Honestly I don't know much about web mentions. It would be very cool however, if when I add a HN/Reddit/Twitter/Mastodon comment by somebody to a curated feed, that that person could be notified by a web mention. From my limited understanding, though, I think this would require web mentions to be implemented wherever the comment/highlight originated from?

I like to think that I'm pretty technically competent, but I really struggle to understand a lot of the standards/protocols that the fediverse/indieweb is built on...
Indeed, at this point, if I had the money (or was in the market for an EV) I would buy a Mercedes EQS (or Porche Taycan) instead of Tesla model S or a of BMW i4 instead of a Model3.
Thinking of buying shorts on twitter now with all the dumb ass news going around...
> To use a flight analogy

Not really. It was more like a story about how someone else made a successful short flight using a different design.
You could streamline the test a bit by using `assertSeeInOrder()`:

$posts = ...
$titles = $posts->pluck('title');
$this->get('/posts')
...
->assertSeeInOrder($titles);
There are so many smart, influencial people on HN. Time to get off Twitter. I quit after 14 years of daily use. Make your voice (not) heard.
Are you unaware that when an account is banned on twitter, it is "permanently suspended?" Seriously, I'm trying to be charitable here.
"tyrant man child" "far too vain" "thick skinned" "like every other conservative"

Ever look in the mirror? That's a lot of hate and presumptions to assume about one person. And Elon is most definitely not a conservative. He has stated he voted democrat his whole life. His support for republicans is only recent and says he is not against voting democrat sometime in the future.
you can't generalize it because one is made public by FAA regulations and the other is not; the argument, if there is one, is whether FAA should require that information to be publicly available or not, not whether someone republishes that information on their Twitter account
Because you don't need 7,000 people to run the bird site when at maximum 1,000 or less than 700 people can do that.

It has run absolutely fine since then despite the psychological panic and unfounded prophesies of immediate total collapse being spread by emotional doomsters still crying on Twitter.

So it was all supposed to collapse any minute now™ faster than a lettuce [0]. Well I guess it is time for the doomsters to admit that they fell for their own FUD and Twitter essentially just overhired.

[0] https://twitter.com/Foone/status/1599920814773919745
It's why I prefer HN over Reddit nowadays. For popular posts, you have to scroll so far on Reddit before you hit meaningful discussion. Although the anecdotes and story-telling on Reddit is unmatched.
Here, this is what good looks like:

https://felipecastro.com/resource/The-Beginners-Guide-to-OKR...

The TL;DR is: In OKRs the Os are the gauges you'd want on a live dashboard of your company (not of your product) and the KRs are what each gauge cluster's needles point at.

They are not project milestones, they are not deliverables per se, they are numeric needle gauges making subjective qualia (the Os) objective (the KRs).
https://opensky-network.org/aircraft-profile?icao24=a835af
True, FR24 will sell you the ability to exclude yourself from their map. Go to ADSBExchange, then. Or another public ADS-B aggregator of your choice.
utf-8 needs 24bit per glyph for the logographic unicode scripts, while utf-16 needs 16 bits. So if you're into selling silicon or don't care about these languages, or you only care about heavily mixed content (like html), then yes, utf-8 would be The Right Way (TM).
Yes the HN cogniscenti have such a fine sense of humor. Why share some of it lads?

Nah man, jokes are forbidden on HN.
“Republished tracker information”
Lol wow.. that’s a cutesy way of saying something super creepy. Talk about Orewellian
Gets even sillier: https://twitter.com/CelebJets has tweets for Taylor Swift, Jay-Z, Oprah Winfrey, Kenny Chesney, Tom Cruise, etc...
Samuel slater is exactly who I was thinking of, I didn't know the Lowell story but it looks like I should do some reading about it. From that link it seems like they were involved in stealing ideas for similar machines with the difference being the amount of intervention required to operate them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Slater
So let me list Musk’s abhorrent censorship actions:

-Bans people impersonating him like Kathy Griffin

-Bans people who share internal communications at Twitter

-Bans people who post sensitive information like his address, phone number or private jet location

-Bans a few militant Antifa groups

Is there anything else? Because I’m not seeing the abhorrent part, especially compared to pre-Musk censorship.

Why should I be outraged now? When epidemiologists were censored leading to unvaccinated being banned from society last winter, no one made a fuss about it.

https://reclaimthenet.org/twitter-reverses-censorship-andrew...
It was the top story on cbc radio yesterday. They pre-announced a potentially world changing announcement.

Actual announcement was important but nuanced. HN comments had this tone. When you’re at that level the press and regular people move on.
Yes, it will still be relevant. Wind and solar are unreliable - or reliably unavailable in case of solar at night or in the dark seasons of the far north and -south. Storage is not a solved problem and - barring a true revolution in power storage technology - does not look like it will be solved soon. Wind and solar also take up a lot of space and come with their own set of problems ranging from detrimental effects on wildlife to interference with communications technology. PV panels are coming down in price rapidly but it is not yet clear what can be done with expired panels as they are currently hard to recycle. Wind turbine wings are used as landfill for the most since their composite construction also makes them hard to recycle.

Neither solar nor wind can deliver the capacity needed for some high-intensity industries while also feeding the increased power demand from the grid without taking up an excessive amount of space without 'fixing the storage problem'. It may eventually be possible to cover part of the world's deserts in PV panels which produce power to create a transportable - solid, liquid or gaseous - energy storage medium which can be transported without excessive loss and stored locally to create a buffer to be used when supplies are low but this is mostly science fiction for now.
It's an important milestone, but many things have to happen before this would have an effect on people's lives. And there's absolutely no guarantee all of those things will actually happen.
Just use their API with text-davinci-003. Very easy to use. I also wrapped it into a command line tool: `npm i -g askleo`