skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The video shows some useful techniques but falls a bit flat as vim advocacy for me. Any modern editor (including sublime, vscode, various jetbrain things and of course vim itself with vim-visual-multi) can do this better and more easily with multiple cursors.

Interestingly, although a lot of comments here are "he should have used macros", one thing the video did suggest to me is that maybe I should be using :norm more instead of messing around with macros (which I feel are abominably unergonomic in both vim and emacs).

Because he toggled insert mode, he did somewhat inelegantly use two :norm commands. But you can in fact do it with one. Pressing <C-V> <Esc> to insert a literal esc at the end of the first text insertion, and then typing 'A">++</a>' will work fine.
Non-reciprocal multifarious self-organization
W cannot be larger than the size of the character set, so even the first algorithm runs in O(N) time.

It's a cool trick, but it didn't make the algorithm asymptotically more efficient as the OP suggests.
Writing things down is important, but if you don't have a system in place to take your writings and do something useful with it like create a searchable knowledgebase and do things like charts or admonitions then it doesn't add a lot of value. GitLab does a pretty good job converting markdown and has some nice extensions, but I think it easy to take that for granted and forget how much value it is adding by creating tidbits like just saying to write things down.
XetHub Co-founder here. Yes, one illustrative example of the difference is:

Imagine you have a 500MB file (lastmonth.csv) where every day 1MB is changed.

With file-based deduplication every day 500MB will be uploaded, and all clones of the repo will need to download 500MB.

With block-based deduplication, only around the 1MB that changed is uploaded and downloaded.
I'm not talking about following other vehicles in front of you. I'm talking about follow the paths the other vehicles, now long gone, have left in the snow/ice/mush.

>do you really think saying "humans don't perfectly follow the rules of the road" could possibly be a novel concept to anyone in the field of AVs?

I do think that driving in cold regions seems to be a novel concept because every time I talk to someone in the know like yourself they latch on to the wrong side of the idea immediately.
Did you know anyone can make an HN account? With no vetting at all!
There are times when it doesn’t apply. But yes, for most people in most situations, as most of us know, you don’t talk. It’s called the fifth amendment. School children learn about it in civics class.
Sort of a yes and no thing. Once the apparent wind is forward of the beam you are effectively sailing upwind.
Sorry, but if I can get a politician to do the right thing for the wrong reason then score one for me.

Political hoopla in exchange for further research into fusion? (Especially now that ignition has been achieved?) I'll make that trade every time.

Bonus points if they want to trumpet the heroic effort in the schools to get more kids interested in the science?

This nation has to get there first. If that causes liberals and conservatives to snipe at each other and compete to advance the frontier then that's nothing but a win for the US. I hope conservatives are mad. I want you to be butthurt.

You're complaining like I care about your cause. I don't. Neither do I care about the liberal cause. I only care about how I can manipulate the both of you and your fellow political fuzzy wuzzies to the benefit of this republic using your pseudo-religious polito-babble.
I sat down and read the NYT article. It's not that glamorous for SBF--at best, it paints him as someone in way over his head, but I'm not sure that's a fair characterization. It's somewhat humanizing, but largely in a "what is the CEO thinking as their business falls to ash around them?"--it intersperses the interview with notes about how the company was probably lying at times, and the most contentious questions are summarized as "interviewee doesn't want to talk about them." I wouldn't characterize it as a puff piece, but I think the complaints are largely that people wanted it to be a thorough evisceration of Crypto Enemy Number One.
Don’t you know the word after awhile? Ruby core and standard libraries have many English words in them that are harder to learn than basic one-syllable words on the level of “if not.”
like my earlier comment, is there anything in the DNS that can help preventing DPI from ISP?
Thanks for mentioning tilvids.com! You got me to subscribe to like my second Peertube channel: https://tilvids.com/c/veronicaexplains_channel

I'll say that the depth and breadth of topics still seems lacking (lots of meta content about FOSS and the fediverse, which is only interesting to early adopters), but if it becomes easier to start, join, and use Peertube instances, I feel confident this will change over time.
If it's so easy then why not set up a site that enforces the patchwork of local laws and exceptions to filter out non-compliant job postings?

If that existed today I would still choose to see the unfiltered job listings, because if I was looking for a job my goal would come down to "find a job" rather than "make sure all job postings comply with every regulation."
... yet another path to molecular assembly of complex structures.
Are people withdrawing the USDC coins or the USD behind the coins?
> Subpoenas can be fought.

They can be, but they don’t have to be, and the current management doesn’t seem interested in protecting SBF or the others formerly responsible for running the FTX network of companies.
> Processed meat is a group 1 carcinogen. Are you going to ban that next? Wait so is sunshine. Are you going to ban sunbathing?

This is exactly what the proponents of these kind of laws want. It's all about control. There is a pop appeal that gets taken up by useful idiots - "rah rah they take our take dollars" - much like the border wall folks might try and blame x,y,z on illegal immigrants to get they ideology pushed through.
There are some comments in here that verge on assuming bad faith on the part of the companies involved, so I think it's worth pointing out that this is a new law which has been in effect for just over a month. It's been on the way for a while, so it's not “sudden”, but it’s still a new thing that people are figuring out and it’s easier to forget about if you’re in the habit of re-using old listings. (Not about OP, whose reminder is helpful and in good faith!)
Ah: They charged him with defrauding investors, not customers. This should be interesting. It may be difficult to get Sequoia to cooperate, probably impossible with Binance.

Wondering if they decide to treat the FTT tokens as a fraudulent asset, which they were, but the chattering classes have been mostly obsessed with the "commingling" business to no end. Dunno if the latter is even gonna figure into this.
> They are not a custody service, they are an exchange.

Interesting. Because a lot of people think they're a custody service and use Binance as such.

> They are not obliged to hold USDC, if all customers have their assets in BUSD due to the conversions that happened.

What? Someone trusted Binance to store USDC. The conversions should not have happened.

> Are you expecting Binance to have 1:1 BUSD on hand, in addition to holding the same amount in USDC as well

No. Nobody is expecting that. You're the only person that mentioned it.
Try to determine which one you're using by running "M-x linum-mode" and then "M-x display-line-numbers-mode". Note that you can use both at the same time (which would make zero sense: it's only to troubleshoot which one is problematic for you).

Do not use linum-mode anymore.

I can display buffers with hundreds of thousands of lines while showing the line numbers (Emacs 29 / native compilation / display-line-numbers-mode / CPU is an AMD 3700X with 32 GB of RAM) and Emacs is ultra responsive.
The best example of vocabulary size and its tradeoffs this is the Guy Steele talk "Growing a Language". One of the best talks ever given.
I have to wonder if you are an investor in one of the private companies trying to do fusion, because NIF beat all of them.

Just a note, no one (really, no one) is doing ICF outside of national labs because no one has the resources to fund ICF other than governments. If you're wondering why your fusion friends aren't excited about this, it's because now the pendulum will swing and people will abandon MCF in droves, because ICF actually achieved ignition whereas MCF hasn't yet.

A lot of fools who poured their money into all the trendy start ups are soon to realize they made their bets wrong. Everyone else is playing defense now.

[0] I said MCF hasn't "gotten close" but it has, that was a bit harsh. It's just NIF beat them.
Interestingly Legasov makes the case that the actual on the ground handling of the firefighting situation was correct:

"Sometimes they say that many firemen got high radiation doses pointlessly, because they were standing at certain spots monitoring that new fires don’t start. They say that this was a poor and uneducated decision. That is wrong because the engine room had a lot of oil, hydrogen inside the generators and other sources that could not only start a fire, but could even cause another explosion that would devastate the 3rd block. This is why their actions were not only heroic but very professional, educated and correct from the point that they took the first precise steps to localize the accident and prevent it from spreading."

Contrary to popular culture speculations since.
the punishment will continue until you're hurting.
Reminds me of several "html4 games" before smart phones went nuclear. The only one I can remember the name of was "hobowars". There was a colonize planets/solar systems and a medieval variant.

It was little bit fun as a novelty, plus getting top ranked in some of them promised a prize like money or xboxes.

It's a lot less fun when every game does it and wants you to pay to win, and when you win you get nothing but the credit card bill.
> …the editor uses certain marks in the video (I don't remember how they are called) that "group" the frames together…

You almost had it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_of_pictures
Because not every violation has bad intentions, so why not be polite?

And folks at startups are usually wearing multiple hats. They might not have a VP of Recruiting/HR/Legal on board that knows all applicable federal/state/city laws. It might be a SWE posting these jobs.
The tl;dr is that "xet" is like GitLFS (it stores pointers in Git, with the data in a remote server and uses smudge filters to make this transparent) with some additional features:

- Automatically includes all files >256KB in size

- By default data is de-duplicated 16KB chunks instead of whole files (with the ability to customize this per file type).

- Has a "mount" command to allow read-only browse without downloading

When launching on HN it would be better if the team was a bit more transparent with the internals. I get that "we made a better GitLFS" doesn't market as well. But you can couple that with a credible vision and story about how you are a better and where you are headed next. Instead this is mostly closer to market speak of "trust our magic solution to solve your problem".
Then not giving them a special soapbox and making them post like regular users would be the appropriate response, right?
> Binance Coin — a native token that is seen as reflecting customers' trust in the exchange — had slipped 5.12% to trade at just under $269 at last check Tuesday
I've been drinking mate my whole life but Tereré, if you are not used to it, is known to ensure you a fast and mostly unexpected bowel evacuation.
I get this a lot. On paper, I'm a technical director of software development. This sounds like I'm a manager, but in practice I'm a senior software engineer.
> Python has a completely different issue and that is that its dependencies on c extensions makes cross platform or cross version packaging a terrible thing.

Well java has no way to do a unix socket unless we rely on a C extension so it's hardly better in this respect.
Someone else here mentioned that cyanide poisoning is painful due to lactate production: that muscle burn from working out, but presumably worse, building until death.

Other tissues besides muscles may also have lactate receptors; I'm not sure. If that's the case, your whole body may have that workout burn.
In this context, as DNS over HTTPS, you're right. There's not much difference except that the provider has to only allow uses of it's DNS service that won't upset the CA TLS cert provider. And the user of DNS lookups has have a very modern computer (software-wise) to support the ever changing root certs; so using old, stable, software (and retro-computing) is further restricted.

But it is much different in other contexts like HTTPS (HTTP/2 + HTTP/3) only browsers where now human people are unable to host a visitable website without getting a continued approval from a CA.
every digital dollar of USDC can always be exchanged 1:1 for cash.

Well ... maybe not always ... and never without fees attached.
ah yeah, that one has me disabling word wrapping on files where I wouldn't otherwise.

Hasn't been enough motivation to leave ST though
They did both DNS over TLS and DNS over HTTPS, and to give some bonus points to Mullvad, the mention DNS over TLS first.
The real question is why HN is filled with people that have values completely orthogonal to the VC space, like people wanting to leverage the law to make other people do things.
They have SBF’s own idiot mouth as evidence when he claimed, multiple times, that Alameda was created first, got its bank account, and FTX used that Alameda bank account when FTX was created.

He alludes to it here: https://youtu.be/4o_jPzBZSIo at 11:58 or so, where he mentions “before FTX had its own bank account.”

I know there’s a longer explanation, but that’s the best citation I can come up with off the top of my head. In the longer explanation, he specifically says that creating a bank account for a new company can be difficult, so they used Alameda’s bank account as they waited for a bank account specifically for FTX.

This goes specifically with point 31 in the document. Of course, they’ll have better evidence once they go through discovery, but this moron has been on a self-incrimination tour. I’d call it a wild success!
I hope we'll see better inference solutions soon. Instead of installing some version of pytorch and downloading .pt-files I'd like to have an inference engine optimized for my computer, and be able to download trained models that run on multiple different systems. There's already DirectML on Windows, CoreML for Apple, ONNX runtime, etc. Not everyone need to train models, and maybe some fine tuning for things like Dreambooth can even be done on CPU. I think what's holding this back is lack of interest from the academics publishing the models, which is understandable.

With a better inference standard option hopefully it would run on AMD too. But I also hope AMD gets their compute to a better place, preferable using open standards so we don't need "Nvidia code", "AMD code", etc.
The OP made a statement about the contents of their feed, not about content they don't see. If they don't follow neo-nazis or people who would retweet a neo-nazi, it's very easy to believe that one being unbanned makes no difference on the content they see.
> Remember the old Rackspace and its famous commitment to “Fanatical Support?” Highly trained people handled the company’s incoming telephone and online inquiries, priding themselves on quick responses and fast solutions.

That spends money to create a good reputation, which is an asset that some MBA type will later be tempted to burn to create $$$ for the short-term gain of shareholders. My understanding is private equity has a very well-developed process to do that.

Aaaand Rackspace was acquired by private equity in 2016:

https://techcrunch.com/2016/08/26/rackspace-to-go-private-af...
Does it actually cost taxpayers?

In Europe most countries tax cigarettes so much that they actually collect more in tax than smoking costs the healthcare system.

Either way, that's not an argument to ban but rather to increase tax or more general to make smokers bear the cost of related healthcare.
"Get off my porch, whippersnappers, etc etc."

I'm only in my early 30's and share this sentiment already.

Tech sure moves fast...
All of the problems you just described are solved for in EUV lightsources for lithography on chips at 100khz or more. These are less hard then you make them sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ge2RcvDlgw

Probably the hardest part is making sure the droplet is cost effective enough that we care.

Again, to op's point, this is an incredibly shallow analysis. The question I would be pushing towards is:

What are the hardest remaining engineering problems?
How likely are we to overcome them?
At the end of that process will it be a cost competitive outcome?
UDP DNS seems intrinsically broken due to address spoofing. Is there an unencrypted TCP DNS standard?
You might be assuming I am trying to evade an APT or I am of any interest to them. That is a fun rabbit hole to go down, and I realize they could spend resources to pursue these avenues. Other comments summarily say that if you try to protect your privacy too much, you automatically become a person of interest. The measures employed by an APT to target and monitor someone at these levels are expensive. They do have abundant resources, but they would be wasting much money and lose focus if they targeted every privacy seeking person. After spending thousands of dollars, they would find nothing interesting on me other than someone with above average tech knowledge who just doesn't like to be followed around. The suggestion that I am flagging myself for surveillance is ridiculous. If I am wrong, I hope they do surveil me to learn this themselves.
Do we even have civics in most schools anymore?
I beg to differ. By all means, keep talking!

I just don't follow my own advice I give to criminals like SBF.
No book is going to tell you that the smaller the project the later it runs if it requires multiple mobilizations. Only decades of experience gave me that insight.

Basically, your project is probably about as unimportant as a project can be for the crew. There's not much money at stake due to scope and there's little to no future work at stake because it's B2C not B2B.

Construction requires relationships, and this one is broken.

"Not the brightest" means at best responsibility for the broken relationship also includes the construction workers.

Fast, Cheap, Good. Pick one.

Good luck.
Amen! waiting for that day to come
> Imagine reading a document like this with "United States of America v Your Name" at the top.

I once contested a traffic violation and the court paperwork stated “People of California vs <my_name>”.
People of California have lost.
Yes but they always miss Part 2 :-)

"Don't Talk to the Police Part 2" - https://youtu.be/tIt-l2YmH8M
> He very likely knows more about the law than anyone on here. How could he not?

There are actual lawyers on HN. I don't think proximity to lawyers makes one as knowledgeable as an actual one.
My father is a civil engineer. That doesn't qualify me to build a bridge.
There's a bunch of places/possibilities.

Bad/absent parents or role models.

A parent/parents who already have a narcissistic tendency imprinting how they act towards other people onto their children.

A parent/parents who aren't paying attention to how their kid acts outside of the home, using excuses and blame deferral to hide the fact that they're bad parents, not exactly encouraging the behavior but ignoring that it's a problem.

Some kids are just predisposed to be little arseholes, maybe it's genetic, maybe it's something developmental.
USDC is supposed to be the good stablecoin.
Another clean energy boondoggle, which means we will be using more and more carbon in the future.

People forget that until recently France managed to generate 75% of electricity from fission energy using 1970s technology.

French nuclear activists even managed to shutdown a much improved fission energy reactor when an inquiry had given it clean bill of health.

How much cleaner could fission energy be if all the money invested in fusion energy had been invested in fission energy instead?

You know where all the drive towards fusion energy comes from - the carbon industry secretly funding activists and channelling resources from the best form of clean energy to one which for the last 70 years has been promising to be available in the next 30 years.

More chance of the sky falling on our heads.
> the only power generation method with direct energy conversion is solar. Wind, hydro, coal, gas and fission all ultimately turn turbines.

For wind and hydro, the fluid motion is directly coupled to the rotor of a generator. Coal, gas, and nukes produce only heat, that must drive a heat engine to drive the generator. The lossy step is the heat engine. The turbine is incidental.

That said, the steam turbines used with coal and nukes require frequent expensive maintenance, a thing not true of water or air turbines. This is why coal and nukes are today uncompetitive, and daily fall further behind.
This isn't really about centralization. It's about federation. And as much as HNers may want it, nobody else does. Let me introduce use to the Plain Old Telephone System ("POTS"). POTS is a federated system. It's true it's also open addressing, which is a factor but not as much as you might think.

People hate POTS. You're identified by a number. It includes a (now meaningless) area code. Portability is a problem. You can switch carriers (although prepaid portability can still be an issue) but it's a process. Also, whatever portability you have disappears when you cross a border.

POTS is filled with spam. Just like email (another federated service). As soon as something is federated it becomes incredibly difficult to police bad actors. If you, as a telephone exchange has too much spam (eg robocall) traffic, you might find yourself blacklisted by large players like Verizon and AT&T. So what do you do? You "launder" such traffic with enough legitimate traffic so as to not trigger any enforcement while charging extra for known offenders. Because that is profit.

A federated system is inherently a game of whack-a-mole with bad actors while being a race to the bottom.

Messaging services like Twitter, FB (Messenger) and WhatsApp all grew and continue to exist because of centralization while federated alternatives inevitably always die or simply never gain real traction. There are real efficiency issues. For example, when policing offensive material (eg CSAM) is each entity responsible? How is that efficient? They might have to do because given material may never leave a given node.

The question you should always ask is: what problem does this solve for the user that they care about?
I’ve had a lot of downtime cuz of Fly.

1/ My certificate didn’t auto-renew and there was no warning. Others had this issue [0].

2/ Fly's free Redis host is trash. Not usable for sidekiq workloads. Others had this issue [1].

[0] - https://community.fly.io/t/ssl-certificate-did-not-renew-aut...

[1] - https://community.fly.io/t/redis-timeouts/7232
Yes, if things were actually getting cheaper that would be "deflation" and it would probably be bad.
Social security and Medicare are each individually trillion dollar social programs. We also just had $2.5 trillion in covid related expenditures to individuals and families and healthcare: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/03/11/us/how-covid-.... Also, as I said, Democrats have been advocating trillions more in social spending (universal healthcare, etc.)

I’m not knocking any of that. But American Democrats are probably the only center-left party in the developed world who advocates for expensive social programs while promising not to raise taxes on people making up to $400,000 a year. My point is that this is a unique outgrowth of the fed’s money printing machine.