skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Multiple countries have passed laws forcing social media companies to remove content seen as inciting violence. They don't have a choice but to remove that sort of content.
It is untrue that Apple turned their back on open standards. What is true is that Google has hijacked the standards body and has pushed things as "standards" that nobody except Google wants (WebUSB anyone?) and have significant downsides for user security and privacy. WebKit has flat-out refused to implement standards that impose risks greater than their benefit. So has Firefox.

It would help if you argued on the facts, not on your emotion.
So many times this. There is a reason why engineers use schematics instead of assembly diagrams or renderings when designing circuits or discussing how they operate. In particular, layouts on solderless breadboards tend to become incomprehensible for any sort of even mildly complex circuit.
Do you perhaps have "Advanced Security" mode enabled, where JIT is disabled for new sites? Site was super jank at first but once I added it to my exception list it was buttery on my M1.
We are planning to do the same thing. Would you have any write up that you could share?
Yeah but service providers can require than you upload a specific file at a specific location.
This way, point your dns all you want.
Love GOV.UK design guidelines. Working for a government department at the moment as a contractor building some internal frontends and the design system is used internally as well. Really helps keep things consistent across all areas of government.
Don’t need manganese or any rare minerals for batteries. Lithium iron phosphate batteries are used in the least expensive Teslas (base Model 3 and Y), and although lithium is very abundant, you can even substitute it for the even more abundant Sodium with only a slight weight increase. That’s superior to Lead based batteries in nearly every way.
Nice idea but it's not very useful without net names or a schematic view. A nice looking UI isn't good if it's not functional
This sounds interesting to me, especially as somebody who was exactly zero interest in learning anything other than regular JS (i.e., no TypeScript, CoffeeScript, or any other JS-extension languages). Is this some kind of pattern, and do you know of any examples that show this?
They are the highest margin because EVs are still supply limited. How smart people think that margin will survive once there is competition amazes me.
Making him grind out restitution at $1/hr on hard labor would do it.
It's not necessarily true for people who think they are in the 99th percentile of best drivers.
> Waymo has proven driverless operations in Chandler, then Downtown Phoenix, then San Francisco.

And how many years did that take. Are they adding profitable operations in new cities year after year, with every year adding new cities?

As far as I can see they simply lose billion and billions of $ for no real success in actually having a product.

Tesla is actually using the technology to improve its Level 2 systems and make money with it.

> meanwhile Tesla has yet to prove N

First of all, Waymo has not proven N, because they don't make money on any of these things.

Tesla at least try to drive in N+10000000 other cases and navigate many of them without seeing them first.

If you have to go one by one threw every single city in the world its not clear to me that this is a better approach then solving a more general problem.

> reduced their chances at achieving N due to cost cutting measures

Tesla just made 3 billion $ of profit in a quarter. What cost cutting? They are currently doing major investments in upgraded sensors suits, upgraded data-centers and overall their team is still growing.

How much did Waymo make again?
Skeuomorphism? No thanks. I’d rather keep the circuit plan clear.
Thanks for pointing that out. I genuinely was under the impression that it was open to all cars, so I learned something new today. It made me realize I fell prey to Tesla's PR.
such as higher density at lower read/write specifications, non-volatility capabilities, lower read-write cycle capabilities

Also known as NAND flash, i.e. the chips that actually wear out. Another example of planned obsolescence creeping in to what used to be effectively unlimited lifespan for "solid state" electronics?
You would not be able to throw it in a ‘smelter’ and have it maintain its chemistry - smelters are huge mass production shops. A foundry could do this without problem. They exist to do small, chemically precise runs.
I'd be remiss not to mention the quite-excellent Iron Maiden song of the same name, featuring some dialog from the show at the beginning of the song.

Rock on.
The title does seem like a misaimed comparison.
macOS Safari (2020 Intel MacBook Pro) is unusably slow.
At whatever point the content creator fails to get paid for the ad being "viewed" I would assume.
The Audi Q5 had issues with the infotainment IMO. It wasn't stock android auto like in my Hyundai. The voice assistant button always routed to the audi voice thing (completely worthless I know what I want google to do, now connect me to google). The buttons felt over complicated.

Although one feature I really liked was that it would tell me what the biggest consumers of power was. I would definitely like to have a car with a heated steering wheel in the winter here, but that isn't in the cards.
I agree that specifications are useful. I also think they're often presented as a panacea. It is important to acknowledge that they're a tool, with pros and cons, like any tool. The existence of a specification does not immediately mean that any and all ambiguities are resolved.
For some people I suppose
It’s pretty simple to use the htmx events on the Response to handle errors dialogs or other behavior
There's already talk of STT-MRAM or SOT-MRAM replacing SRAM. They offer similar performance while also being non-volatile. If SRAM scaling ends, this becomes a much more promising technology.

https://semiengineering.com/sot-mram-to-challenge-sram/
>the most uncharitable interpretations possible

The bias and hand wringing about censoring people whom they even admitted hadn't actually broken any rules disclosed in by Taibbi and Weiss deserved no charity. It was worse than people had imagined.

And you're just going to ignore this part?

>2) Twitter's censorship was almost 100% aligned with the Dem Party.

That's not "moderation". That's "partisan censorship".
I live in a big, hot desert with millions of others right here in the USA. We are ready for this tech. Intel and TSMC think this desert is pretty awesome, as do I.
They're few and far between, but a good radio station make this a non-issue. KEXP in Seattle is phenomenal; I listed to them just as much as Spotify or my local collection.
Isn't that the point? It is their circle. Why would anybody decides of someones else's circle?
Etherfields is one of the best board games I've ever played. Beautiful, thematic, exploratory, unique, great mechanics.

Seventh Continent is also fun from an exploratory point of view, though it has a bit more self-similarity in its gameplay loop such that the mechanics can get old, but the exploration doesn't.

On the other end of the spectrum, Jaipur is a two-player quick card game with great style and fun, great mechanics, and much of the "reading another player" of a gin/pinochle/etc style game.
Oh you brought critical thinking to the topic. That’s generally welcome on HN. But those stories about Musk have an inevitable headline: “Another angle from which to justify your resentment of Elon Musk, including the opportunity to prove that you are a better than him, of not in achievement then in moral standards”.

That’s why your comment, which demonstrates knowledge of the circumstances and asks the obvious questions, ranks 1/3 of the page down.
Easily format and display code in Google Docs
Seems needless, and possibly amusing to extraterrestrial archaeologists after we've blown ourselves to extinction.

> Formalizing the Anthropocene would unite efforts to study people’s influence on Earth’s systems, in fields including climatology and geology, researchers say. Transitioning to a new epoch might also coax policymakers to take into account the impact of humans on the environment during decision-making.

Ah, it's purely political.
I think that is "Horseless Carriage".
Overwhelming majority of time I was driving on highway, the right lane went below speed limit. That makes up quite a lot of cars that go below it.

And I used to drive exactly speed limit (as measured by GPS) and that maded me among the faster cars on highway. Only few cars went faster then me.

I made effort to slow down lately and can confirm that the biggest and only issue to overcome is the ego and the knee jerk "being there faster makes you better driver" kind of thinking.
No, there are numerous reputable accounts posting screenshots confirming this. Seems like it is not rolled out to all users yet.

Edit: Just tested it myself, confirmed.
Game Boy Development Community
There are people out there gaming at 30fps with their TV set to Super Duper Image Processing Mode 500ms Latency Edition. Though I suppose these are realistically already served by the cloud gaming offerings.
It would have got it right if you got it to show its working.

That's the trick to doing computations with LLMs, the computation per token is constant so you want to split the computation over many tokens.

> I have 2 cats and 1 horse. How many legs do they have in total? show your working.

> If you have 2 cats and 1 horse, they would have a total of 10 legs. Cats typically have 4 legs, so 2 cats would have 2 x 4 = <<24=8>>8 legs. Horses have 4 legs, so 1 horse would have 1 x 4 = <<14=4>>4 legs. Together, the 2 cats and 1 horse would have 8 + 4 = <<8+4=12>>12 legs.
> I wish VLC had a better loudness processor, I don’t succeed to configure it to keep the whole movie at the same volume, whether they’re speaking or using automatic guns.

Probably won’t help you if you’re using VLC, but most of the streaming services now have multiple audio tracks in the same menu that would switch to another language called “<Language> - Reduce loud noises” which is pretty much that. I just find it inconvenient as an apartment dweller that the default is to blast the volume during any action sequence.
How are we going to define "live"? If the data is five seconds old? Five minutes? Five hours? How far between measurements can we share? Does this policy apply to everyone, or just nonpublic figures?

Can someone provide a citation that doesn't require me to enable Javascript to answer these questions, if they are addressed in the policy?

I spent good money on a Bellingcat workshop and now some of those skills are apparently useless, though to be fair the example we used in class was Jeffrey Epstein's plane, not Elon's IIRC.

(I browse HN via Tor with JS off for "opsec")
U.S. SEC votes to advance stock market overhaul proposals
I see lots of comments in various ML repositores about trouble running on multiple GPUs. This seems like a great way to run across multiple low VRAM GPUs instead of buying a huge expensive single card. It feels reminiscent of how Google built their clusters on commodity hardware where they would just throw away a failed device rather than trying to fix it. This is really cool.
Relevant HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33984922

Comparing disengagement and driver intervention data might be useful to compare Tesla FSD vs others.
You can't charge someone money for sending a file

You can charge someone for access to a file that is pointed to by a link
> and META going up a lot.

Exactly.

and the whole point in being skeptical when the mainstream media decides to select and parrot their FUD at the 'current thing' 24/7. Before, it was Meta; the whole impending death was greatly exaggerated by the media. Now its Tesla's turn.

They have also done it months ago with the british pound as it slid to its lowest levels through the panic. Now it has gone up 17% since after buying it two months ago. [0]

The power of identifying the FUD and ignoring the panic.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33274020
Let's see if he goes full "My dad is Li Gang!"
I'm still not sure what the 3D aspect in particular adds, though. Tools which work with physical wiring diagrams, like Fritzing, have been available for ages, and I don't think the 2D nature of those tools has ever been a meaningful obstacle to understanding.
> the safety of the individual feels compromised

Exactly. I have had zero accidents in 20 years; I'm not interested in a car that will lower the overall accident rate if it increases mine.
As someone in the recycling supply chain, this is incredibly cool. The possible carbon reduction emissions are massive. This would need to scale up by factors of 100 (400 tons a year is nothing- a single sea borne cargo that is traded is often 32-40000 tons), but amazing to see the cutting edge.
Self driving cars are mostly a bad idea in most cases. The only thing worse then cars with 1 person in it driving around is cars with 0 people driving around.

The goal should be less cars overall specially in cities. Technology that will cause more cars and more traffic is just terrible.

Cities should ban cars, make it pedestrian and bicycle friendly, build 'self driving' metros and S-Bahn style train systems.
I have 5 goats. I milk 3 of them. Right now, I'm getting very little milk because I'm in the final process of drying them off so they can give birth in 3 months. I'm currently milking about 2 pounds total from them every 3 days. When they're at full production, I get well over 3 lbs per goat per day.
I will never buy a Tesla because of Elon.
> Several minutes after popping the flash and removing the battery, I still measured more than 100 volts on the contacts, due to residual charge retained on the main capacitor after the flash tube extinguished

Can confirm. I was playing with one of these when I was a teenager and decided to see if I could shock my arm and make it jerk. The sequence of events was supposed to be...

1. Grasp one electrode in left hand.

2. Pick up the other one with my right hand and tuck it under my left shirtsleeve.

3. Depress the take-a-pic button and watch magic happen.

In reality, step 2 shocked me from arm to arm, straight through my chest.
This is how I remember it as well.

Nintendo was public about dropping out of the console fight and doing their own thing, which is still true to this day with the switch.
Supreme court doesn't pass laws, so we're crossing the streams of two subjects in the same comment thread.

The Supreme Court has decided that corporations are people and we're dealing with the aspects of that. The Supremes then decided that civil rights were okay to no longer have protections, so we're now dealing with that. The Supremes decided that men get to decide what health care women can have.

Why would Congress need to act when the Supremes are legislating from the bench on their behalf, only they don't take the hit because it was the Supremes that did it.
Wish there was something like this (or like Sponsorblock) for podcasts. Would make them actually listenable to.
This claim is not true.

As someone who drives a Tesla with the FSD beta, the vehicle has been getting progressively better since 2018.

It’s drives smoother and brakes more predictably dive they stopped using the front radar.
If you had written that in your original comment then you probably wouldn't have gotten that many down-votes.
We are saying the same thing. I agree, of course, that SBF's sentence will be much higher than these dipshits. But the mechanism by which they're calculated is basically the same --- SBF will have some level accelerators that the DDoS'ers don't have, and the DDoS'ers will have some 18 USC 1030 accelerators (circumvention devices, domain names, maybe PII) that SBF doesn't.

If you do the actual exercise of picking out a realistic loss number and doing the calculation, you'll find that the 2B1.1 loss table dominates the sentence.
“Everyone kind of agrees with”

That’s a broad claim yeah?

Data to support that claim?
> That’s too simplistic in my opinion.

You got an adult explanation above. You asked for ELI5.
Why self-driving trains are much easier to implement, yet there are not that many systems capable of doing that?
Many newer metro lines are GoA 2 or 3, theoretically capable of running autonomously, but they always require a driver in the loop.

My partial answer is, making an extremely reliable system is hard. If someone wrote a deadly bug even only happen at a very corner case, it still can kill people. And it's quite hard to prove there isn't such bugs.
Here's a great post from a post-production audio mixer explaining the many convoluted steps that go into delivering a final mix with correct loudness specs to end users. tldr, there's a lot of room for error.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AudioPost/comments/y2m1u0/comment/i...
It's not a jump in technology. It's the result of a slow growth of that technology to "mature enough to take liability for". Which is a better way to move tons of machine around under computer control.
This is cool and all, but I'm still waiting for the FBI to pivot from investing time into piracy and DDoS-for-hire to website operators who run sites that distribute truly awful media.

I get that there are anti-piracy lobbies. I get that if you piss off enough companies they're going to put heat on you (see: this). But there are dozens of copycats of Ruben Rosales (https://www.justice.gov/usao-az/pr/mexican-national-sentence...) and they are truly awful people.
None of those things are expensive. Rents and mortgages are.
It's very reactive to the prompt:

> i have 23 horses each with a normal number of legs, along with 14 dogs, each with a normal number of legs. how many legs in total do all of the animals have?

> Based on the information you provided, it sounds like you have 23 horses and each horse has 4 legs, and you have 14 dogs and each dog has 4 legs. If that is correct, then the total number of legs among all of the animals would be 23 x 4 + 14 x 4 = 92 + 56 = <<234+144=148>>148 legs.
Spoiler warning: it doesn't.

Unless you only consider the happiest path, as in "I develop on localhost with zero latency, 100% uptime, and my backend validation logic perfectly matches my frontend policies" (and probably a lot more other "if"s and "only"s).
Brookings says it’s about $310k per child for a family with 2 children, without including daycare or higher ed costs [1]. US median lifetime income is roughly $1.65 million [2]. Daycare averages somewhere between $10k-$15k/year per child [3]. In state public school tuition is ~$100k for 4 years [4]. Median sales price of a house is ~$425k [5]. Total cost of that house with mortgage interest and taxes over 30 years is roughly double that.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33879844 (courtesy u/lotsofpulp)

[2] https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/1...

[3] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/understanding-true-...

[4] https://educationdata.org/average-in-state-vs-out-of-state-t...

[5] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPUS
> [...]that'd be rapid progress towards modernizing it.

I misread this as "monetizing". almost snorted.

What's so bad about the UI?
is it dated because of it's structure? or does it seem dated because of widgets (the style, the way it is drawn?)?

The super powered UI problem is not quite solved, unless you accept microsoft's ribbon interfaces as a solution
> I like that you can strategize and compete without directly getting in each other's way.

You may be aware of this - this genre is called Eurogame

https://boardgamegeek.com/wiki/page/Eurogame

It's the type of game where you don't directly or fully interact with your opponents (at most, you can usually indirectly block one of their moves, but that's about it). People seem to like the less adversarial playstyle as there are many successful games in this genre: Catan, Ticket to Ride, Puerto Rico, Carcassone etc.
Right. But that is in designing the existing roads. I'm talking about the cars. And I'm specifically asking why not adding more options? I don't mind a camera being part of the solution at all. Gives an obvious path to human labeling of training data. But, why not have more?
I tried using fetch(). I naïvely passed an object as the POST form parameter and it sent the string "[object Object]" to the server as POST data.

Apparently you need to use some special object type. Why doesn't the universal key/value type work for passing a key/values? Who knows – maybe there's a good reason, maybe not. I do know that sending [object Object] is literally never what anyone could possibly want and that almost any other design choice would be less idiotic.

So I just use xmlHttpRequest or jQuery.ajax(). xmlHttpRequest is kind of awkward, but it's straight-forward and you don't get nonsense like this.

I also don't care much for promises, and fetch is pretty promise-heavy.
Because it's not an airspace where speed/visibility are important for a variety of reasons... FBOW moreso post 9-11
I subscribe to YouTube premium and one of the great features is that creators get significantly more money from my views than from an adsupported user. So every monetized video that I view helps them out a bit more. That along with ad free viewing and YouTube music make it the best value of anything I subscribe too and would be my last service to cancel.
Go to bed, Sam's friend
Yes, you certainly can. Our family is not the only one that does but we are in the extreme minority.
My neighbors waste tons of money on:

Landscapers

House cleaners

Food delivery

Brand new cars!

And of course baby sitters and child care
It wasn't hard, but it did ask a lot of questions that your average homeowner may or may not know. Do you have a humidifier on your furnace? A dehumidifier? How is the emergency heat configured? Is the fan DC or AC coupled? Questions like that. I self installed mine no problem, but I can see how people could be intimidated.

For what it is worth, I think the Nest has been generally worse than a dumber programmable thermostat, especially after Google took it over. The App only allows a single phone to be connected now which is a problem when both me and my wife want access. There is also no way to run the fans without switching it on heat or cool. The fans can also only run for a maximum of 12 hours before it needs manual intervention to restart. All of which are a problem if you have say a pellet stove providing heat in one part of the house and want to circulate the air to the rest of the house using the furnace fan. On my old thermostat I could even switch the fan to low speed mode when the heat pump wasn't running, which is something the Nest seems to have no concept of. There is an API, but it's all Googlefied and requires a subscription and kind of assumes you're already a full stack Google developer.
One of my biggest concerns about Tesla's vision based approach is that it appears to be entirely about cutting costs. Nothing about it says they actually think it is superior; the cameras on a Model 3/Y are mediocre. They were mediocre the day the Model 3 was first released. If you were going to rely on a vision system in a serious way, you'd at least invest in better camera tech. Hell, Subaru EyeSight has a significantly better camera setup, last I checked, and who looks to Subaru as a technical leader?

Someone else said it here on HN, and I think they're absolutely right -- Tesla is all about vertical integration, and this is preventing them from excelling at anything other than saving pennies. A good part of why the new EV competition is doing everything better is they didn't roll their own tech. They bought packaged solutions from companies that only do one thing, but do it well.
Can you show a screenshot, please?

UPD: Should be fixed now
Believe it or not, if you spend enough time with a Tesla, you quickly realize that actually detecting things is a solved problem.

The thing they need to improve and are doing so rapidly is actual trajectory policy calculations.

And that’s not going to get better with more sensors seeing the same things it already sees.