skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
uh, in what country? US police have shot 10 people a day since at least the 1980s.

you may be confusing some statistics here. About 26 police die each year. about half are from violent conflicts, the rest are traffic incidents, gun cleaning accidents, etc.

I'm not sure where you're getting "26" from, but that's literally never been true in the United States. I can probably collate and link 26 videos of cops shooting people without weapons this year. and what is a "weapon"? they brandished, aimed? or just had one nearby? if i have guns in my house and the cops shoot me in my house, was i armed? what if i was asleep in bed when the cops busted in my door? does this change your calculus at all?
if any of this is true its utterly fucked.
> Authors Hajo Adam and Adam Galinsky wanted to explore that nature of what they call “enclothed cognition,” the effect that the clothes we are wearing have on our psychology
you want a source of police accountability? lol, most police agencies don't even report killings of armed suspects unless it makes the news.

I can start a video stream on one of my servers that will just be several hundred videos of police killing unarmed people, if you'd like. would that count as a source?
Nah, this is probably just normal torture scenarios based on what the human body/mind can handle that psychologists/doctors already know.

Example you can get psychosis if you don't sleep for a lot of time, etc.
As you’re well aware I replied to a very well specified hypothetical and I responded to its specific conditions. It was about clear threats by participating persons against a non participating person. Continuing to interject suspicion of the hypothetical target of those clear threats is very much an example of bad faith.
> absolutely trivial and avoids a dependency.

I disagree with this other than in a simple example. Updating something that depends on sth is far from trivial. It looks trivial.

> The true price is that you've now rewritten your HTML code in a non-standard DSL and are forever dependent on a third party library

So, like React. Prob also a build and scaffolding tool, and a linter were added in that case.

Regarding arsthetic I actually find htmx kind of ugly but it works so well I cannot ignore it. It simplifies everything a lot, but I am just discussing here.
It's built specifically for an alternative consumable, the largest expensive of a flight right?, that cost SEVERAL TIMES what the standard consumable costs right now?

That's a.. Forward looking design.
Of course it‘s a good rule.

It is also at the same time contrary to everything he‘s said before about how he would run twitter - hell, he called this account out specifically as one he would not ban because he is oh so committed to free speech.

It will also not be enforced against anyone except if you‘re sharing the location of Elon, of a billionaire buddy of his, or kick up enough of a stink that it‘s a PR issue.
Adelstein had both an outside strait and flush draw; ie went all in knowing they needed the flop to win. It seems highly plausable that this could have been "read"; at which point Lew did know exactly which two cards they were playing. Is it 25 to Adelstein vs 19 to Law; not ideal but concevable you might call (against a stronger player who would eventually bleed you; a near evens chance if winning can sound quite attractive)
I have one - the clever features are switched off because they didn't work (didn't heat up the place to the temperature I wanted). I just have a set schedule instead. It has a nice phone based UI and looks very classy. The thermostat can start to read too high (possibly due to the device itself generating heat) so it can get colder than the temperature that you've set.
We don't owe you anything.

If your business model involves annoying us, we'll find a way around it. This is YOUR problem, not ours. Find a better business model or go out of business.
It's a private company, they can do whatever they so wished.

And as a non-US citizen, I don't care one iota about where the US billionaires are flying, for better or for worse those US billionaires don't influence my life too much. But I do care about censorship when it comes to US politics because those US politicians decide about the status of big boom-boom military stuff in my country, stuff that is employed in killing people (this recent video [1] was filmed about 20 km from the town where I grew up as a kid). The latest Twitter seems to really have changed its stance when it comes to fighting censorship in US politics. As such, I applaud Musk on this.

[1] https://twitter.com/elenaevdokimov7/status/16015871425760706...
These aren't JavaScript APIs, they're Web Platform APIs.
A Crypto Exchange
> Humans can't tell that difference, except in the sense of "it's good when my side does it to you, and bad when it's the other way around."

Many humans can though. There's a very big group of people that think every corrupt politician should be investigated. This type of thinking is not equally prevalent amongst all sides of the political spectrum. It is prevalent amongst all extremist forms though, but that probably has to do with the type of person that becomes extremist in the first place.
> There's tons of ways for a malicious party to sabotage source code. Most are probably more subtle than unicode hacks. It is like complaining about how the person you gave a key to your house to might rob you.

That's not at all how the open-source world works. Many unknown (to the project maintainer) people can create pull requests and try to sneak in a backdoor through, say, an homograph attack.

if ( id == "root" && some_other_condition )

Pull requests comes in:

if ( id == "rοοt" && some_other_condition && some_even_better_condition )

I totally vet that! Beautiful added security measure, that "some_even_better_condition" is the nuts, nothing can go wrong: it's an added protection! I merge that ASAP and release!

Except your diff tool missed that on that same line "root" was changed to "rοοt" (and the attacker created an account named "rοοt" on your website).

Game over.

The point is not to bitch about my pseudo-code or how account creation do work: the point is that it's easy to miss an homograph attack during a review.
What was the reaction like at the time?
I saw it first in the 80s and it was relegated to a very late night slot on Irish national tv where art house stuff usually played.
Radically Unsupervised
In the United States at least the subsidies for public transit pale in comparison to subsidies given to drivers in the form of road maintenance and parking subsidies. Subsidized public transit makes a ton of rational sense. The fewer cars there are driving around me the safer I am and the cleaner my air is. I want everyone to have an option to get around that doesn't require a huge upfront investment. It seems you and I are optimizing for different values but there are plenty of rational reasons to support it.
Author uses the word "internment" to describe quarantine, which shows either gross ignorance or a deliberate choice to ignore reality and focus on the emotive.
the kicker on the police abuse stats is that the study that everyone links was self-reported. 40% of active duty cops who were asked if they ever abused their partners said "yep".

I've embellished or lied to survey takers a couple times, mostly to protect my anonymity or because i forgot something. I assume they try to correct for "self-reporting" in statistics.

but 40% of active law enforcement had no problem saying "yep i beat my partner".
I actually have some firsthand experience with the IDN governance (long story short, I and other people opposed a certain kind of expansion in allowed Korean domain names [1]), and I was once told that IDN basically happened because the PRC government threatened that they will make their own DNS equivalent otherwise. I don't know how much of this is true---while who said this is supposed to know what's going on, I don't know if one actually knows that---but it did sound plausible given the haste nature of IDN and subsequent measures like LGRs.

[1] https://no-hanja-domain.github.io/ (in Korean)
I seldomly ask others for a ride, I prefer to pay a taxi cab. And no, I would still prefer a taxi driver over an autonomous vehicle even if they were available, because a human is still very much useful when it comes to the last 50 meters of a trip. I often ask for guidance to find the correct entrance, for instance. BTW, your argument is very cheap, I tend to hear it often. "You are afraid of roboters? Here is one, play with it, you will like it!"
Sorry for not being clear, I used the number of piano keys as an example of how limited the domain is. MIDI wasn’t designed to express ranges with 100’s or 1000’s of values. Twelve tone equal temperament is good enough and technology is not going to extend human hearing another four octaves.

What MIDI really got right is flexibility with regard to timbre. The standard was so open that General MIDI only came along later to establish some consistency for timbres.
On-site Dental is pretty common for a lot of tech companies - dentist comes to you. It’s nice enough.
> It was my fault - it wasn't locked up.

You don't live in a high trust society. However, diversity is our strength.
What happens if i put a magnet nearby ? Does it still work ?
they're adversarial to you.

So, uh... what?
DataSketches experimental adapters for Apache Spark
It's good to see that things are turning for those who want to practice r/NoLawns, create a wildlife refuge, or practice permaculture design.
You misread parent's post. They wrote (emphasis mine):

> extreme far right realized they could rephrase their violence as speech

And in your post that became:

> It's actually the far left that characterizes speech as violence.

"Rephrasing violence as speech" has approximately the meaning of "pretending violence is actually speech"; "characterizing speech as violence" has the meaning of "pretending speech is violence", ie, the exact opposite.

These two claims don't contradict eachother.
Then they develop a 5km long linear city in the Goldilocks zone called The Line
Getting some MacroMedia ColdFusion flashbacks! But not in a bad way.
They want to bet against them on the stock market with a "short", a bet that their stock price will go down. This company isn't public so one can't exactly short them, so maybe it's just an expression
I'd be so happy with a 24,000 page PDF, cause then at least you know where too look, and you can the search tool. I programme Siemens hardware and the docs I need are spread out over many tens of PDFs (of 100-1500 pages). I haven't found a proper tool than can let me search and view all this documentation properly. Best I found is ripgrep with some PDF extension to search which document I need, and then use SumatraPDF for finding the right page... ughh
You’re linking to the “report” by the accuser that consisted entirely of character attacks and borderline paranoid speculation. It contained none of the evidence he had promised.

Similarly, nothing we’ve said is any more than speculation. That’s fine, but that’s all this is.
The available flight information does not identify anyone.

I can go on one of those websites, see all those flights, but I have no idea who they belong to or who's on board.

That changes once someone specifically links a private jet to someone.

Within the EU I'd be interested in the ramifications with regards to the GDPR.
Former pro and high stakes player here. I don't know the principals involved and as such have no particular strong opinion on whether any cheating occurred, but this particular situation of a ridiculous hero call based on a very specific read is common enough that it doesn't raise any red flags to me.

Mostly I just want to comment to say that any analysis involving her hand equity against a random hand is flawed. For one, bluffs generally don't come out of a random range. Probably more importantly, someone deciding to have undue confidence in their read and acting on it is more common than some people here seem to think. It's pretty clearly a bad call under almost any reasonable analysis, but I wouldn't have been making a living if people made good decisions all the time. In this particular hand, if you convince yourself that the opponent has exactly 8c7c (not hard to do), it's also going to be pretty easy to convince yourself that a hand with the Jc in it is a good enough candidate to snap off that bluff.

Meta-considerations about offering to return money or the likelihood of choosing to burn an exploit for a very marginal situation don't seem particularly convincing one way or another unless you know the principals well. However, if I had to choose one word to describe a high stakes poker player, "erratic" would be a pretty good one. Basically I think anyone uninvolved who's sure of what happened is probably being overconfident.
Isn't there an unwritten rule in Amsterdam and some other cities, where there are tons of crappy old bikes around and you can just take one and leave it elsewhere? In Innsbruck that was the case.
The value of a spec is having something that resolves how to deal with quirks discovered in an implementation. Absent of a spec, any implementation quirks become a part of the language.

Which is okay as long as you only ever have one implementation, but when you want to, say, reimplement Typescript in Rust then you have to duplicate all of the quirks that came before, even in cases where nobody has yet realized that the quirk exists. Failure to do so means that your implementation won't be compatible with the canonical implementation.

At the other end of the spectrum, the Go project maintains two independent compiler implementations to ensure that the spec is implementable and to see that a single implementation, with all of its quirks, doesn't end up defining the language. That puts a lot of confidence in the spec to guide additional implementations, but, of course, is a lot of added work.

Tradeoffs, as always.
> We have cookies.

But we block 'em.
Most doxxing is just taking public info found by a 2 second Google search given the right starting point.

There are countless videos of people screaming in fast food restaurants. If someone recognizes that area, looks up public addresses in the vicinity, and finds a name match, from there you can easily get a phone number, work place, etc.

Doxxing is less about information acquisition and more about intentions and location in which it’s shared. Angry mob posting online about some evil person in a video and you find the target’s address just by looking up their license plate? Most communities will ban you for doxxing if you post that info.
"Everything old is new again" feels like a reductive reaction but...
I assume that, while dragon was designed originally for 7, since the design has been changed to 4 people that other things have been adjusted that mean 7 is no longer an option. For example, the parachutes might be slightly smaller for the reduced expected weight. Or the environmental system can only deal with the heat, moisture and co2 of 4 astronauts not 7.
I'm sorry, are there not nightly shootings in the areas where this occurred anyhow? Not everyone was participating, perhaps drawing conclusions based on partial evidence isn't warranted here.
This is not fair.

However, Elon can change the rules arbitrarily and give his family special protections against harm.

Why?

Because he can. Because he owns the site. Because he paid big monies for it.

And FWIW, if you care about it, build/own an alternative.
They could've done the easier, and more correct, thing and just abolished HOAs. Very few people with good intentions want these around.
Time to take the whole internet down because some people are searching "how to commit sucide"
If I had a dream, well several actually, one of them would be to expand public libraries to include small lab areas where development boards and other useful "bench" stuff were available (maybe for a fee) - a tinker library perhaps.

I could imagine communities springing up around them.
You do realize that you can just call the city and complain?
> one the most simple but fundamental question of “Why?”

Flight simulator cabin making might be one of the reasons.[0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_simulator
It's incredible the mental gymnastics some people go through to justify behaviors they would find unacceptable if directed to their own person.

Bottom line is: there is no justifiable reason to publish real-time location info of somebody against his wishes other than to harm him.
Reposting public information that is broadcast to the public in real time and required by law to be public while operating an airplane in the public airspace isn't doxxing.

How come this is only an issue now that Musk is throwing a tantrum? It's not like his situation is unique, the location data of every aircraft is broadcast and published in the same manner.
I want to believe but my B.S. detector is pegged at 11 with this company.
What you are doing sounds like a very worthwhile thing - not everyone is Stephen Hawking. You should set up a project homepage now if you don't have one, GitHub is free and quick, and put a link here. That way you can present your idea properly and people can contribute ideas.

Monetary switches can be had for next to nothing, you just need a housing (for a one off I would use a plastic pill bottle).

Will look out for your link.
At this point I think companies should be required to run long clinical tests for the "foods" they produce/process. The food industry became an out of control experiment with world's population as guinea pigs.
Seems like they're only TCP, unfortunately.
so you witnessed the police abuse their power with your friend, but you still think that's the best bet?

i don't think you're the target audience. Since this post was about you being the person your friend called. you know, instead of the police.
Would you mind expanding on it a bit? I do sincerely appreciate its pithiness, but curious to read it explained a bit further.
While, yes, the data could have been used to track him down, but reposting it on twitter is not enabling anyone to stalk. Crimimals that would want to hunt down Elon or X, would definitely have specialists who can gather this and other data without some random twitter user
I have bad news as someone who grew up with a lot of domestic abuse: lots of abusers think they’re in the right and don’t have any sense of shame. They probably feel well protected by all these people making absolutely every possible excuse for them imaginable.
Doug Polk thinks the binary signal might have been a vibration device that appears to visibly shake her chair during the hand:

https://youtu.be/xPQUarLEr9A
There is a procedure that allows supersonic operation under certain conditions granted on an individual basis. In addition, any new aircraft would need to meet current airworthiness and noise certification requirements.
And what about the interstellar mycelial network? ;)
> they at some point were deemed necessary for public order.

yeah, around when those pesky slaves were escaping and their owners sent squads out to collect their missing property.

I'm not sure this is the butt-slam you were hoping for, partner.
In the past I have downloaded kernel modules & SDKs for Linux, which were partially open (i.e. had binaries, compiled libraries, etc. alongside open parts), and they were intentionally compiled for highly specific environments, tying the modules or SDKs to (archaic) OS releases which are very hard to obtain, or cannot be obtained from anyone except the hardware vendor.

We wanted to use these thing in newer systems, but it was not always possible, and made our lives way harder than it should be. At the end of the day, you buy vendor's hardware and want to couple it with more modern software, but the vendor doesn't want this for some unknown reason. Planned obsolescence, maybe.

Now, consider that a company pulls the same shenanigans, but by moving the magic to the compiler. All source is open, but can't be compiled because, while the code valid, its correct compilation needs a specific compiler behavior, and the vendor who opened the source cannot share the compiler in source form due to "trade secrets". They may require you to send the code in to "make sure that it's fine", or "sign an agreement" to get the compiler, for a fee, maybe.

I don't want to live in this world, or leave anyone accidentally in that state.

> Many Rust people don't want to live in the C/C++ compiler world, because they don't have to. "Oops this code won't build with GCC" is a battle they'd just as soon avoid.

As someone else noted, gccrs people say that "We strive for rustc compatibility. We will not extend or mangle the language, and consider rustc as our test suite." This is a pretty strong commitment to "many implementations, single behavior" promise.

I started my computing journey in a very open and flexible ecosystem, and with every stopgap put as in the name of security, this openness and flexibility eroded step by step. With this pace, programming and development will be confined to corporations which design the hardware and OS running on them, and PCs will be consoles with keyboards.

I don't want to live in such future. This is why FSF/GPL is important, for me.
> Elon jet wasn’t political afaik.

In the current political climate, anything that isn't political but does something one side of the spectrum dislikes, automatically becomes political. Elon has turned quite extremely and vocally to the right. So people on the right will view ElonJet as an attack on the right. Unfortunately, that's just how it goes.

These days you can't even write anything objectively anymore. You'll always end at a conclusion that one side will interpret as being against them and then attack you for it.

Slight tangent, but it's especially visible in people who support stuff they're actually not in favor of, just because the perceived 'other side' dislikes it. I've seen people who live environmentally conscious support farmers in the Netherlands, just because the farmers were protesting the current government. Dutch farmers have a huge impact on the Dutch environment and supporting them is the opposite of being environmentally conscious. Yet, people think that the enemy of their enemy must be their friend and the other way around.
forgive me the obvious, but why don't you start using voice typing? it's awesome
Seems like a ploy to fire employees who don’t work over the weekend?

Otherwise it just seems tremendously idiotic.
Not sure if I would classify Schulte as a "whistleblower" - the CIA is an espionage agency, and the stuff he leaked contains details on how the CIA performs electronic espionage, i.e. how it does its job. So AFAIK it's not as if he exposed some illegal activity on the CIA's side?
Are "speakers blasting 24/7" normal?
> Ford is on pace to build 2m EV a year by 2026. Which is 2x the amount Tesla is building yearly.

AFAIK, Tesla's current capacity is about 2M per year.
>Edit: the ENT/VOY comparison makes no sense even with the retcon IMO, how is warp 4.6 in a mid-22nd century ship an order of magnitude faster than warp 4.7 in a 24th century ship?

Emissions. ;)

I mean there was a TNG episode where they limited warp to factor 5 because of space emissions destroying the space environment or something like that.
Acrobat reader used to let you search all PDFs in a directory; not sure if it still lets you do that.
Statistics dictates there might, just might, be one or two that believe him.

The rest are probably a mix of visa lock-in, 2 months from retirement, not quite found somewhere to land, and "self-sacrifice" going down with the ship to try and limit the blast radius
If you have the means and contacts to obtain a Stinger, I'm pretty sure you have means to obtain info on someones whereabaouts. And why wait fore someone to be in the air, just use an IED while on ground.

I wanna be clear, this is just a mental exercise, I do not wish nor want harm to anyone. This is just because Elon's ego is getting the best of him.
False. Tesla data sharing is opt in only and the car works fine when sharing is not enabled, the default.