skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The general problem is cumulative exposure to cosmic rays on long-duration flights. It's not clear if even a Mars mission has acceptable risk, and flights past Mars mean everyone gets a very high risk of cancer and radiation-induced cardiovascular disease.

To shield against the high energy component of cosmic rays, you need to wrap the crew compartment in something like a few meters of polyethylene or water. This is far heavier than anything we could launch today, but would work on something like a nuclear pulse rocket (that has a minimum weight requirement!)

There's an additional problem around Jupiter, which is what Pioneer 11 discovered. The strong magnetic field causes lethal radiation levels at the inner moons. Again you can solve this by wrapping yourself in crazy amounts of water or plastic, but it's far beyond our capability now.
Why does it seem like everyone who is fired up about this is unaware of the timeline of who was president when?
What world are you coming from? The story for buying windows apps on the internet has been pretty fine for a long, long while; and, compatibility hasn't been any problem at all, in my experience.

Further, since most things were shareware, you could just _test_ the software on your machine ahead of time.
> This didn't happen on Android, macOS, or Windows, despite all of them allowing alternative app stores.

EA and Epic have entered the chat. This has absolutely happened on Windows. Source: the PC attached to my TV where my kid plays games, just this week.

I would posit that there are two possibilities for why it hasn't happened on Android:

1. The UX for alternative app stores is so terrible that they may as well not be allowed.

2. Not enough people want to pay for software on Anrdoid for this to be worthwhile.
Moot point, Apple's own App Store currently impliments ad tracking pretty much exactly how the Play Store does it: https://searchads.apple.com/
> Zero? Really? I'm calling baloney on your claim here.

Yes. They're surprisingly overt about their end goals. I think the gullibility of "the masses" even surprises them. They want to flip the world economic system to be "stakeholder" based, meaning, they own everything (literally, down to the land itself) and you own nothing. It's neo-feudalism.

The whole climate change brew-ha-ha is simple psychological manipulation, i.e., "we'll tell you the sky is falling with our models, reinforce it via the media co's we control, and repeat it until you accept it as truth." People who are terrified will listen to anyone who appears to have an answer or is operating from a position of authority (the last 2-3 years being a beta test that was successful). It's just the Milgram Experiment/Agentic State thing on a massive scale.

These people believe they're the rightful rulers of this world and all other people are, for all intents and purposes: assets on Earth's balance sheet.
May not even need to be 70% of your customers if you have costs that scale with the number of customers. 30% is a fraction of revenue, not profits.
Someone gave him the signature to verify the hash.

He explains it during this stream here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjE4dEX2z9E

You can just watch the first 10-ish minutes to get the gist.

He gets the same push back he's getting here. Still confidently says "Paul Le Roux is Satoshi."
The content is extremely controversial, yes. But check all the scammers in the comment section. It‘s truly mindblowing.
Thanks for the clarification! I didn’t explain myself well at all, but what I was getting at was that Shkreli claims the sig “decrypts to” the message given, when it does nothing of the sort.
So GMX might know who Satoshi is but... GDPR?
You're not wrong, but games are probably a unique space where that's the sort of thing that already regularly happens on PCs as well, witness the proliferation in publisher stores over the last few years. AAA studios are simply used to forcing that sort of extractive behavior from users, and users are all too willing to comply.

But I don't think there's that much threat for the gaming + mobile market, in the sense that Fortnite aside, I'm pretty sure EA/UbiSoft/Activision Blizzard/etc. don't really have "killer apps" for iOS that would entice a lot of users to use their third party app stores. For all other types of mobile games, Apple Arcade is hard to beat.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30204012

Though perhaps there is a concern if Chinese gacha game makers start making their own stores.
Do you believe Chrome should remove the developer tools to protect users from harming themselves? I mean, it's literally one key press away.
It can not only be a lot faster, it definitely is.

I did a lot of work on QUIC protocol efficiency improvements in the last 3 years.
The use of sendmmsg/recvmmsg yields maybe a 10% efficiency improvement - because it only helps with reducing the system call overhead. Once the data is inside the kernel, these calls just behave like a loop of sendmsg/recvmsg calls.

The syscall overhead however isn't the bottleneck - all the other work in the network stack is. E.g. looking up routes for each packet, applying iptable rules, applying BPF calls, etc.

Using segmentation offloads means the packets will traverse also the remaining path as a single unit. This can allow for efficiency improvements from somewhere between 200% and 500% depending on the overall application. It's vastly useful to look at GSO/GRO if you are doing anything which requires bulk UDP datagram transmission.
Then again, some people are hypocrites.
Burned some bridges in personal relationships and then went deep into qanon stuff.
Of the non-government agency guesses, this one would be the most credible if not for one thing - not even Szabo could sit on $50 Billion in bitcoin and just casually never spend it. The NSA is the most credible culprit as Bitcoin creator.

However, I do think Nick Szabo is the mysterious "Nicolas van Saberhagen" creator of Monero. Besides, Monero aligns more with his ideology. Bitcoin is supremely traceable and a handy tool for government. Monero, not so much.
I agree! These results are NO cause for celebration. To do so would be deliberately misleading, and potentially devalue celebrations in general.
Don’t ascribe positive feelings to popularity. I’m only using git until the moment there’s a viable alternative written by someone who knows what DX is.
I get 1Gbps and use 5G as my main internet at home, I cancelled with my traditional ISP and have been using 5G since.
> Why do people continue to tout this as some sort of gotcha? Android has multiple app stores yet this doesn't occur.

It is very possible that this hasn't ocurred because google has not enforced the same level of privacy-related restrictions that apple has (which reportedly costed facebook ~10 billion dollars [1]).

I'm a strong supporter of device owners being able to do what they please with their devices, but the risks are there and are very real.

[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/kateoflahertyuk/2021/11/06/appl...
So if I make a competitor called the Avocado company, and my Avocado phone can only run third-party software I vet myself, and my entire marketing pitch is "this vetting process protects your security and privacy", would the same argument apply?
The first computers DOS ran on were from a different era. The first PC model had 16kb of memory and a 160kb floppy drive. There was literally no space for error messages.

DOS itself literally took up an entire disk. You'd have a DOS disk with the DOS utilities like fdisk.exe and format.exe, but you'd boot off that, then swap to a program disk to do actual stuff.

One early DOS IDE (Turbo Pascal 2 or 3 I think?) would prompt you to load error messages off disk at startup. If you chose not to, it would free up some memory for your project and you'd need to look up the messages in the manual by error number.

Only a few years later, every PC had a hard drive, >1MB storage on a floppy, and the full 1MB real mode address space filled with RAM.
Thinking "if that ever gets anywhere close to a problem we'll have vast resources and plenty of time to fix it" and then, I'm guessing, that person left a few months later and nobody owned that part of the code because it worked.

Then 10 or so years went by...

Whenever I write code like that which may break in say, 5 years, I'll sign it in the comments and put my personal email and phone number inviting future people to call me and I'll fix it for free (cause I take responsibilities for my code pretty seriously). Nobody has ever taken me up on it though...
I'm a little confused, but maybe someone from the adtech space can answer this. If you're logged into Facebook, why would they need another identifier for you?
Or maybe a large part of the jailbreak process is blocking Apple from detecting that a device is jailbroken.
Are UX people okay?
The famous AUTO_INCREMENT that you though you would never reach...
Why AI likely won't disrupt 3D world creation
I think the "With modern lasers" part is addressing that.
And yet Facebook hasn't done this, and Epic hasn't done any of the scary things you're spooking yourself over in your OP. The fact that an app is distributed outside of the app store isn't proof that the sky is falling like you're saying will happen.

At the end of the day, if you're this afraid of Facebook, you're free to not use it. There's no reason other users should be restricted because you think that the spectre of Facebook might lurk in the shadows.
A classic case of "ids aren't numbers even if you choose to make them numeric"
I dont have detailed knowledge, but rating agencies clearly violated their duties by providing AAA rating to junk
Every story on this website, like thousands of others, makes money from affiliate links.

That doesn’t change the authenticity of the article; this is just the latest in a series of stories about Apple’s health and safety tech coming to aid or saving someone’s life.
Wes Anderson did a wonderful movie about a very melancholic Cousteau pastiche, played by Bill Murray – The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou. Of course there is a Calypso equivalent in the movie, the Belafonte. Here is a tour:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1RnYfFZK2k
It does read like a paid advertisement, but it's just rewording a Reddit post, from someone whose extensive and varied commenting history gives the impression of genuine personhood (I snooped).
So you migrate to int64 and one day someone will wonder why the hell did we ever think no one would reach 2^64 rows in a database table. Or that 2^128 IP addresses would be enough for everyone.
My emotions correspond just as much or more to very abstract shapes and textures as much as color, and often the color is in combinations/gradients. Everyone will have a personal spin on how they "see" their feelings.

But the basic concept is great and the site is really well done.
When I said LoL events get 200k views, do you understand that was correct? Because, in context, I meant, "at least that much and often more," not the opposite? If you had understood my comment, you wouldn't have had to look anything up - you would've known that LoL events do indeed get more than 200k views without checking. Right?

That requires considering the context and interpreting ambiguous comments charitably, as suggested in the HN Guidelines: "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith." When you misinterpreted my comment and triumphantly declared me wrong and accused me of bad faith, well, that's the opposite of that. Anyone can misunderstand something, it happens, but you need to be willing to say, "Either that guy's crazy or I'm missing something" and default to the latter rather than the former, like I did about the NFL thing.

Also it might be worth taking a step back and considering the topic, and whether such a combative tone is appropriate for it. And while you're at it, do you even disagree with the point of my comments, as opposed to the numbers? If so, I missed the part where you said so.
Like New York, which is still too expensive.
Someone gave him the signature to verify the hash.

He explains it during this stream here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjE4dEX2z9E

Someone else suggested he could have bought the signature. It wouldn't surprise me.
Thank you! I've been sitting here hitting F5 hoping someone would post.

How do you obtain this?
>Would also explain why Satoshi went silent since the guy is sitting in federal prison.

A cursory Google suggests that Satoshi's last communication was on April 26, 2011. Paul Le Roux was arrested on September 25th, 2012.
It is your choice, just like you don't have to use sideloading. Choices are nice.
Probably preparing for the year 9999 issue early.
They could, but I argue that Meta requiring users to use a third party app store would likely be self-defeating for them. It could conceivably alienate a lot of users who don't want to deal with managing yet another account, let alone subject themselves to an environment run by Meta.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30808926
300MJ ~= 83kWh which is like, $2000 in CA
You are entirely correct. I'll just add that it's not only about the energy put in, but ultimately about the cost.
Net positive energy output is the absolute basic requirement. We're not there, we're not close, and even if we were, the hurdle would be to make it economically viable.
>Users who value freedom, competition, and efficiencies of markets can also enjoy those things, but they currently are prevented because Apple will pull no stops to protect their App Store moneyhose.

The counter is that these users do have a choice. They can buy an Android.

Allowing different stores might end up removing choice for the end user who like Apple's current approach as the large developers with power like Meta will likely force the different stores on us. This change is reducing Apple's power, but that power isn't all going to the end user. It is empowering Meta, Google, Amazon, and other big tech companies who are seemingly even less likely to act in the end user's best interest than Apple.
People with industry knowledge in that thread, certainly like the writer of this new, much more verbose post, were very aware of how FUDy the original outrage article was
More deployed and reliable, right now. The possibility of blending in with all the rest of H/3 traffic alone is a good reason to work on (O)DoH3.
You care about that enough to complain, but you don't have an adblocker? I don't see any ads.
Stoff had more than one translation into English. One is cloth. Another refers to substances. Eg hydrogen is called Wasserstoff in German: water-stuff
Perforce also has support for proxies right? It’s not just the TB of data, it’s all of your coworkers in a branch office having to pull all the updates first thing in the morning. If each person has to pull from origin, that’s a lot of bandwidth, and wasted mornings. If the first person in pays and everyone else gets it off the LAN, then you have a better situation.
> so why would they pay 30% simply to be on a store they don't use?

The argument for this on Apple's side is that you're not paying just for the payment processing, but you pay it as a fee for benefiting from the user base that Apple attracts via their investment into their R&D from the hardware, to the UI design, to the APIs that enable your app itself to run.
Just referring to what particles the released energy is carried in.

The easiest fusion reactions to make happen release most energy as neutrons. But neutrons are, from a practical standpoint, a huge pain in the ass to deal with. They just fly off until they hit another atomic nucleus.

They irradiate the structure of reactor, making it radioactive and weakening it, neccesating periodic replacement. This means handling radioactive materials, which as the existing nuclear power industry demonstrates, is hard to make cheap.

Reactions that release excess energy as charged particles, though all harder to actually do, leave you with charged particles that can be directed by electric or magnetic fields and can be used for direct enerergy conversion.

Yes solar requires a lot of surface area, but fusion power is just not looking like it will be anywhere near cheap enough for the real estate savings to matter.
SoundCloud is from Berlin, Germany
Their servers are getting hammered, I think some of these features will be unreliable to enable temporarily.
https://www.ponylang.io/discover/#why-not-pony
They'll just have to remember that losing is fun
It's entirely specific to Figma - the whole blog is, but the article pages should really have some kind of indication to avoid confused recipients of direct links.
not the first website where it happens but Firefox doesn't let me scroll down, I only see "Hello, World!" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I do.

But having a debilitating disease is a different story and beyond the persons control.

Given a choice, I and many others here will continue to learn and adapt.
That’s not a treat model 99% of users have to think about.
I wonder if the ratio of misplaced outrage threads to useful ones makes the idea itself something to be done away with entirely. There's seemingly little space between curiosity and full blown outrage, an no natural mechanism for the community to more deeply and openly investigate and report on these issues before taking an over sized and possibly wildly unjustified stance on it.
As someone from a southern US state who faces similar "caricatures", there's no need to pretend and hide your feelings. Instead, I think we should join together against those who would oppress us and keep us down and uninformed in modern society.
I'm inspired to try a book of (very abstract, and almost certainly quite poor) drawings using colored pencils and figure out how to use textures.
Why would it not be feasible to have pipeline direct from the Mediterranean Sea to the Dead Sea? It's not very far, about 60-odd kilometers. They probably wouldn't even need to do any pumping because the Dead Sea is a lot lower than the Mediterranean, and gravity or a siphon would very likely be enough.

It's not as if that would be a major and/or expensive solution.
Getting the same as well, there is no scroll down at all!
The new release adds graphics (instead of the ascii art styled graphics) so maybe that might be less daunting.

I say this only from observation, having never played the game. I saw a headline recently about the graphics update and you can see it in the videos on the Steam page:

https://store.steampowered.com/app/975370/Dwarf_Fortress/
Works great on Proton so: 6 hours in with ~20 dwarfs and decent automated production
https://tutorial.ponylang.io/getting-started/how-it-works.ht...
I always wonder why people are so impressed about his excel skills.

I have seen many people in BI being much better. He just knows his shortcuts and pivot tables, this is standard stuff.

And the mayor discipline, if anything, are customized macros which run cross device for a whole department, like opening one reports, filtering the data, creating a new file with a date stamp etc and sending reports and stats.
Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33971431.
> The data versioning system enables us to run pipelines based on changes to your data; the pipelines declare what files they read, and that allows us to schedule processing jobs that only reprocess new or changed data, while still giving you a full view of what "would" have happened if all the data had been reprocessed. This, to me, is the key advantage of data versioning; you can save hundreds of thousands of dollars on compute. Being able to undo an oopsie is just icing on the cake.

...isn't that just parsing git diff --name-only A..B tho ? "Process only files that changed since last commit" is extremely simple problem to solve.
Please don't pull a notch, please don't pull a notch...
I would guess Steam will only distribute games from companies for legal reasons...so most likely, yes.
http://web.archive.org/web/20221213211717/https://www.reuter...

https://archive.ph/ijeyN
I think the disabling of "secure" features will be enough of an inconvenience that people won't do this, and so mainstream apps would never bother. Some might be willing to give up ApplePay. But they could disabled FaceID as well. Or even iMessage. Whether this is "justified" or not would be a separate issue, but I can definitely see them doing it. I can see them going a step further and letting developers decide if they want to allow their software to be run on systems based on security model. Banks, for example, could simply set a flag in their app such that it will not run if the system is set to a reduced or permissive security setting.
There is certainly that, but in fairness GP is correct that I am saying that at some point tech is going to outstrip even the best of us (maybe it's just the dumb me projecting).

One possibility that comes to mind is that we could possibly rely on trustworthy AI to help us understand the implications of using X in full. So if not walled gardens maybe private landscape architects or AI gardeners.

But one of the two will be required for digital life.
Smart phones are as close to general purpose computers as you can get.
Therapy games sound like a great idea to me.
> let alone subject themselves to an environment run by Meta.

Why would EU Lawmakers be satisfies with some crazy process that requires rebooting the device or going through 10+ steps to enable sideloading? These EU laws will likely require low-friction alternate app stores, which means actually installing Facebook via an alternate method might mean something as low-friction as meta.com/store -> "trust Meta store" -> open and install Facebook.
If anyone is showing that they have problems in this thread, it's definitely not the people with tattoos.
everybody dies one day....and most...use hospitals and health care....so the argument is just a waste of time imo - and frankly....the air is connected across the globe...so that argument is kinda weak too ..
Since you're calling me out for lying:

The first dota esports tournaments started in 2004, full history here: https://dota2.fandom.com/wiki/History_of_Competitive_DotA_(T.... The tournaments have been running for 19 years.

Even if you argue that Dota 2 was the true birth of these tournaments, The International 11 (the 11th yearly dota 2 championships) was held this October: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_International_2022

The first International was held in 2011, over 11 years ago. Invites to participate went out to the existing highly ranked dota esports teams - DotA was already established as an esports game at this time, which is why they were able to source teams from around the world to play.

In regards to your claim of lineage, in the same way that chess does not change between a wooden board and when you upgrade to one carved in marble, I'm curious as to why you see these as two separate games? Dota 2 was purely an engine upgrade rewrite of the original mod, without any gameplay mechanics changes. Dota 2 and Dota 1 maintained parity with each other until Dota 1 was deprecated in December of 2016: https://dota2.fandom.com/wiki/Version_7.00

They're the same game.
IMO those are good ideas. I've set up a few NixOS servers with various general-purpose VPS companies, and there are often minor irritations in getting the OS installed.
And you didn’t feel the need to mention that in your reply to the parent comment, that introduced this assumption that I was building off of?
As I understand it that's largely because some of their equipment is outdated or not optimised. Building a new facility from scratch would result in a much lower power consumption from the grid.
That's outrageous! I'll have to keep using Chrome because Google's CEO only makes $80M/yr and he's a dude, which is much more reasonable.