skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think that'd be a reasonable policy for anyone who isn't claiming to be a free speech absolutist.

If you make that claim and then enact censorious policies then you're plainly a liar.
I'm not going to justify this action, I think he's in the wrong, but if the only speech he's suppressing is people making fun of him I don't care that much. Hypocrite, sure, but I'm more worried about the project Matt Taibbi lays out in pt 3 of the twitter files:

> Before the Capitol riots, the company was engaged in an inherently insane/impossible project, trying to create an ever-expanding, ostensibly rational set of rules to regulate every conceivable speech situation that might arise between human beings.

> This project was preposterous, yet its leaders were unable to see this, having become infected with the firm’s groupthink, coming to believe – sincerely – that it was their responsibility to control, as much as possible, what people could talk about, how often, and with whom.

^ THAT, is the kind of policy I'm worried about.
Earlier this year when Mercedes announced its Level 3 "Drive Pilot" system [0], a lot of Tesla stans mocked its limitations, which to be honest, are quite numerous on the face of it:

- Only allowed on limited-access divided highways with no stoplights, roundabouts, or other traffic control systems

- Limited to a top speed of less than 40 mph

- Operates only during the daytime and in clear weather

But the big promise from Mercedes is that it would take legal liability for any accidents that occurs during Drive Pilot's operation, something that Tesla doesn't appear to be even thinking about wrt Autopilot and FSD.

I would love someone to goad/challenge Tesla to step up to Mercedes. If FSD is so much better than Drive Pilot, then why doesn't Tesla agree to provide a "safe mode" for FSD, that operates with the exact same restrictions as Mercedes' D-P, and offers the same legal protections to any users who happen to get into accidents during "safe mode" FSD operation?

[0] https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a39481699/what-happens-if-...
And preventing the triggered and willful spread of disinformation about our elections and public health is not a safety issue??
Does this actually render a native Android back button to the canvas or are you simply saying Pax solves this by not restricting the user from making their own solution to the problem?
Thanks!

You can also checkout the "feature/ui" branch in GIT [1] to get the UI framework prototype.

[1]: https://github.com/Lichtso/contrast_renderer/tree/feature/ui
Yeah I agree that Elon is full of shit, but there's a little lie in here that needs to be addressed:

> normal company operation in good faith

But it wasn't "normal company operation" because they completely disregarded preexisting company policy for dealing with political figures. Here are political figures that they didn't ban (who were inciting violence)

> 20. In June 2018, Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei tweeted, “#Israel is a malignant cancerous tumor in the West Asian region that has to be removed and eradicated: it is possible and it will happen.”

> 21. In October 2020, the former Malaysian Prime Minister said it was “a right” for Muslims to “kill millions of French people.”

But they banned the former president. What they were doing wasn't "normal company operation", it was a bunch of power tripping people in upper management (like Roth) who "took it upon themselves" to disregard preexisting company policies for some odd reason

You can dislike Trump/Elon/et al, but the "normal company operation" bit is an outright distortion of what actually happened

source: https://nitter.net/bariweiss/status/1602370518585221120#m
Maybe not what you're looking for, but my children.

I have a lot of hobbies and try to contribute what I can with my skill set. But I'm honest with myself. Nothing meaningful I create in the digital form will outlive me so I'm never overly attached. I've also lived long enough to see my interests change drastically that I am confident I won't have the same interests in 5, 10, 20 years (nor would I want to)

However with children I hope to serve as an influence and guide for my entire life.
What exactly is your experience? This just seems so innocently naive about how spies actually work
I'm failing to see the safety threat here.

The account republishes publicly available information. I'd hardly consider that doxxing. Flight data isn't private.

Elon pointed to the existence of the account as demonstrating his attitude towards free speech and as far we all can tell, nothing has changed.
The Global Zeitenwende – How To Avoid a Cold War in a Multipolar Era
Was it? I always saw "it's a private company" used when people were complaining about a particular social media policy contravening the first amendment and people pointing out that the first amendment doesn't apply to private companies.
Its own industry being medical research? Perhaps somewhat more important than eating meat or beauty products?
grep regex /var/log/logfile -05 #To view the 5 lines before *and* after the match

This appears to work with GNU grep, at least, but YSK that the POSIX grep option for this is `-C`.
> not ever

Modern IC production would have sounded absurd in the same way a mere lifetime ago. (It kind of does even now.) The first market for ICs was in the 60s space race (and I guess ICBMs) which could afford the initial milder absurdity.

I'm sure you're right about the rest; it's a pet peeve when people round off this kind of thing to "never".
I remember my grandma telling that story maybe 30-40 years ago. Gotta be an urban legend. Yup: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cruise-uncontrol/
> As high profile as Musk is, something like that account is a real threat to his personal safety in my opinion.

People who want to actually harm Elon Musk don't need that Twitter account to do so. I don't see how it is a threat to his personal safety, when this data is easily available elsewhere.
The rule being sticken happens to affect me. And also most of my peer group is now spread out between cohost, splintered fediverse servers (who blocks whom? it's a mystery!) and somehow some are still on Twitter despite it clearly being an increasingly unsafe place for the likes of me. (Especially considering who got access to the backend moderation service to "investigate" now).

So I'd say his fits had a pretty severe effect on me.
You've posted this elsewhere.

If this is an honest question, an honest answer for you: he's the most powerful person on the planet. He can shape the world in ways that no other human can.

It's reasonable to be concerned about his behavior. The potential for him to change society is astronomical.
I've no doubt this has probably happened in real life at some point but it's practically a fable by now.

I think the Simpsons done it at least 30 years ago.
Someone posted a meme before Elon completed the purchase (or maybe shortly after) about how this account would be nuked from orbit. I thought something so transparently hypocritical would not happen but here we are.
TL; DR: Don't!

This reminds me of a line from Tom Lehrer: "if you can't communicate, the least you can do is shut up."
signed up and am gonna wait for figuring out what it is.
My daughter.

I've been working on a stack-based language, that is highly dynamic, incorporating as much of the theory work around F-expressions as I can. For a number of years. I'm getting close to getting it fully-realised into something that is both performant, and shouldn't feel too odd for most programmers, even if they're unfamiliar with stack languages.

That work? Doesn't matter at all. What matters is how my daughter learns to respect herself, and position herself in this world.

I've been known to be drop everything, when she asks me what a Gruffalo is.
I'm journalling computer and software ideas in the open and I have been journalling since 2013. I am up to 700 ideas and 25 startup ideas.

Here are links to them
https://github.com/samsquire/ideas
https://github.com/samsquire/ideas2
https://github.com/samsquire/ideas3
https://github.com/samsquire/ideas4 (incomplete)
https://GitHub.com/samsquire/startups

I am working on a multithreaded programming language interpreter and compiler. I am interested in parallelism, asynchrony and multithreading.
You're not flabbergasted and you don't believe it's doxxing. You just support your boy Elon.
And who’s going to stop them? Certainly not the US government.

Enjoy beta testing FSD as an unwilling pedestrian.
Thank you, well put. It's like everyone's incredible amount of hate towards Elon is blinding them to the human aspect of this. Never seen such overwhelming support for a doxxing account. Let's not forget to be humans guys.
Hey SilverBirch, kinda curious about your viewpoint but think it best discussed over a more long term communication medium, can you drop me an email at dyth68 at yahoo dot com?
What is the actual risk? I suspect he's way more likely to get into a car crash.

The information about his plane's location is already public. Posting it to twitter just makes it spread further. Also, a plane's location isn't very useful. Even doxxing someone's permanent address (not that elon has one) is a pretty minimal threat to their life.

A plane's location is some of the less dangerous speech allowed.
Tracking of personal billionare jets is absolutely legal and will take exactly 5 minutes of time and $0 for anyone who decide to do it. If Musk don't like it he is free to use a car instead.
I'm curious how they're internally spinning the justification. It doesn't seem to be a violation of Twitter's Automation Rules [1] but ostensibly could be a violation of their harassment rule [2]. It's a bit of a stretch. The litmus test will be if/when the internal comms get released as part of the Twitter Files. I won't hold my breath.

[1] https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-autom...

[2] https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules
This makes sense until you consider how much time many open source devs spend maintaining popular products, and the kind of ungrateful people they often have to deal with.
Ah yes, surely the meaning of that bible verse is, "Don't ask mildly difficult questions based in any sort of moral stance." Because we all know that book is famously opposed to performing any sort of moral analysis.
How so? Either those loans are attached to Twitter (as I think they are), in which case his investment going to zero is still the worst thing that can happen, or they are attached to his wealth directly, in which case he will need to pay either way.
While I think things could have been done in a clearer and more above-board way, Twitter does seem to have an anti-doxxing policy that includes sharing non-public information about a person's presumed location. So a bot that crowdsourced a politician's location would seem to also be in violation of this policy.

https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-info...
Being good at parsing is most of what you need to be a top AoC contender, so there's a strong connection there.

On a sidenote, I've had a good time reformatting input as python expressions and using eval()
According to Elon Musk as recently as yesterday, yes they should be allowed to have an account to parrot info to the world. There are many other accounts whose sole existence is to report other jet data (See @celebjets). None of those accounts got banned.
Hey I'm on the Supabase Auth team.

Supabase Auth uses GoTrue, which is a Go server. It's all open-source, so you can self host it as much as you want.
Once a shining star on Twitter's skies,
Elonjet's wings were clipped and it could no longer rise.
Its tweets were a joy, tracking Musk's private jet,
But now it's been silenced, its fate is set.

Elon Musk now reigns supreme on the platform we love,
But his control has come at a cost, with many pushed out.
The fired workers are left to wonder and roam,
While Musk's grip on the site only continues to grow.

Oh Elonjet, how we'll miss your tweets and updates,
Tracking Musk's travels with such keen insight.
Your suspension is a sad moment, a loss to be sure,
But your spirit lives on in the memories of those who adored.

-Credit to ChatGPT
I empathize that people are frustrated with the marketing claims of this particular feature, which are clearly bunk, but the point of the post you're replying to is not to defend it, it's to defend that the other commenter is not being negligent and putting their child in danger...
Ok, I read the article.

I was not able to locate the frequency response profile of the actuator, which is what really counts.

Rapid moving sensations are really not an issue in todays market.

I hope one day someone comes up with something there which does not requires a backpack of pumps like Haptx.

That moment is when magic will happens in haptics
It's really remarkable to me just how often this guy gets offered several billion dollars just when he can't take it. It's like people can sense he's signed a document preventing him from taking money and then inexplicably jump in and start making it rain.
Yes 100%.

I have not been sick in about 5 years and then I caught Covid when the first wave hit.

Since then, I’ve been sick at least once a month while my wife and kids have experienced the same thing (just less extreme)
Its a binary choice for content producers. If you sell to one distributor, you have to sell to everyone on the same terms
> the conventional wisdom at that time was that information should be released as soon as possible with no redactions

That was very much not the conventional wisdom at the time. This choice by Wikileaks was hugely controversial and in stark contrast with Snowden’s leaks, which were published by journalists after having been analysed, filtered and redacted. Citing Snowden and Wikileaks as if they operated in the same way is simply wrong.

And yes, just dumping stuff without at least checking them is morally and practically wrong. If only because it makes you very likely to take part voluntarily or not in disinformation campaigns if you’re fed false documents.
AEB cannot magically instantaneously stop a car that FSD has put into the wrong lane. If you believe otherwise, please do not drive. Cars are dangerous in the hands of those who do not take risks seriously.
I can't speak for the others, but the free version of Slack keeps all of your chat data indefinitely. Paying customers can view it, free users can't.

Presumably the authorities would get the data from Slack directly.
This is a great line of reasoning that can be used to justify banning anything. What if a soft-headed person reads it and does something horrible... Like, say, attempt to carry out a coup?
People criticising Lex on his position on the Twitter Files on the lex subreddit were banned recently, despite Lex publicly saying in that same thread he didn't want criticism banned.

https://old.reddit.com/r/lexfridman/comments/zf0zqx/the_twit...

Getting echoes of Musk honestly.

So I assume Lex continues to be as bought into Musk's narrative.
First thing I thought of, gonna have to rewatch that whole talk now.
Curing cancer will be infinitely more profitable than a lot of things, for the investors, but that doesn't mean they will be willing to pay engineers more than pure financial manipulators, even if they are able.
Good example of the 2nd-order effects of how being "aggressive" on putting self-driving into the hands of drivers can cost lives. Not only can Tesla "F"SD cost lives directly through accidents, it could sour peoples' opinions of more mature driving systems like Waymo's and delay our shift to safer, automated, drivers.
This would not have been required if apple allowed all legal apps and kept their cut reasonable.

Some apps require asine amount of permissions on Android to work. Imagine a hypothetical texting app that recently added video call feature. Now it won't let you get past permission gate until you give it permission.

These same apps work just fine without those permissions on iOS.

If there's one good thing about apple's enforcements, it is this (and similar things like privacy protections).
Honestly, I think you're just wrong on this one. Debuggers are great for sussing out unintended behavior and kernel-level traces. You're not going to figure that stuff out any faster by staring at your code or trying to understand it better.
If they use an algorithm to promote posts to increase their bottom-line instead of some neutral and transparent way (such as reverse-chronological feed of what people explicitly followed) they effectively act as an editor and should lose whatever Section 230-equivalent protection they are currently using.

Facebook (and other "growth & engagement" platforms) currently want to have their cake and eat it too. They act as an editor, selectively promoting certain content that increases engagement and thus their bottom-line while not taking any of the liability. Newspapers can do this too (and to a certain extent, do) but are under strict regulation which limits the damage (yes, tabloids are a thing, but none of them would publish outright calls to violence and promote illegal activities, something very commonplace on Facebook because outrageous content generates more engagement).
Can someone please explain to me what/who is ElonJet and why I should care that he/she/it has been suspended?
clearly I need to learn more about stock ownership; but that would require the opportunity to own stock. And I'm from a secondary/lower socioeconomic-tier from a 3rd tier (third world country). So those opportunities aren't readily available to me.

regardless,

the restrictions on trade of physical goods exists due to matters of ownership over government-level permissions (licenses?) for import/export, taxation, an other such kinds of things. It's ownership over whole countries; that's the ownership at play when considering digital trade restrictions.
Do you own a home? Would you like a social network that allows someone that doesn't like you to post your home address to millions of followers? Are sites like acris a security concern?
I don't really take credit for that stuff in public, but it's not a secret. Feel free to contact me.
Favorite Chrome Extensions of 2022
Don't think there would be an ethical problem with that; it's instantaneous and probably less prone to error than injections. But the optics aren't quite as good.
My understanding is that the 'Trust and Safety Council' was an international board of external stakeholders and consultants to help with 'Trust and Safety' (moderation) at Twitter, NOT the 'Trust and Safety' division within Twitter.
No harm, no foul. GP's child learned a valuable lesson which may serve the child well in the decades to come: don't trust self-driving.
If "against their will" means "without their consent", one might never again be able to post a picture taken in a public place where faces were identifiable in the background.

Ordinary photographs constitute ample and often accidental documentation of where people were at any given time. Even if you assume consent (which is a real unfair assumption where people don't even know about posts being made about them), this would suppress a lot of information that is very clearly in the public interest; if I can get posts taken down that document I was doing a bad thing in a particular place, I have a lot of power to suppress evidence of my malfeasance.

The US's legal framework here makes a lot of compromises that make a lot of people unhappy, but if you dig into it, you can see why it's complicated: reasonable-sounding policies work their way to unreasonable results in various subsets of cases.
Ah, thanks to the person who looked at my submission history and gave me my sole upvote. I guess all I needed for marketing was a good sob story ;)
NK? Where do you see women represented in positions of power? Honest question.

Kim Il Sung (or his son? memory is hazy) had a special all-female army unit that was his literal harem. I don’t think they value women very much, outside perhaps of nepotism.
Replace churches with a secular alternative, with trained psychologists instead of priests, 1-on-1 brief sessions instead of confession, and mindfulness meditation instead of prayer.

Ensure everyone in the community participates by giving local tax incentives (i.e. cut council tax by X%).

I think people today desperately need a 3rd space, a local community and a sense of belonging, and this will provide both. Ensure that people living locally, with different backgrounds, see each other once a week, which would naturally lead to some communication. The 'priest' will be in a good position to provide pastoral care, be able to help people that are lonely or otherwise struggling. Many would be willing to help struggling people locally, so in many ways it is a coordination problem which this would solve.

I feel like by becoming less religious we have thrown the baby out with the bathwater and lost some very good things along with the bad. It does not have to be that way.
Hi, Nick here from SideGuide. Thanks for your questions and suggestions.
1. As of right now it seems like 90% of the responses can infer the language pretty well from the issue context. Although we are working hard to improve this.
2. We use the issue's labels to identify the issue type and choose an appropriate prompt depending on what type it is. Thanks for the suggestion, will add more screenshots about that asap.
3. We're currently only using GPT-3 (davinci-003) on production. But we are currently testing ChatGPT too, but we don't think it is ready yet due to it is down time/rate limiting and lack of fine-tuning capabilities. Because this is still an early MVP, we haven't gotten around to filtering abusive responses just yet.
> But even if science proposes God as the hypothesis at step 3, the next problem comes at step 4: how are you going to test it? "Um, God, could you do that again? And, um, sign it this time?" You can't run the experiment. I don't see how you could run the experiment even in principle.

Then you should check your Bible ;-) because 1 Kings 18 describes just such an experiment. There's always a Less Wrong article, and this one's is https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/fAuWLS7RKWD2npBFR/religion-s...

There have also been things like experiments on the efficacy of healing prayers whose negative results lend credence to the idea that a god who answers prayers does not exist. https://www.noctua.org.uk/blog/2010/07/08/healing-prayer-exp... discusses that (the links to the Premier Radio forums are dead, alas).

> even if we can't see it with science, we might see it with history. We might find historical record of God doing something.

"It is strange, a judicious reader is apt to say, upon the perusal of these wonderful historians, that such prodigious events never happen in our days. But it is nothing strange, I hope, that men should lie in all ages."
There used to be a lot of talk about "Software Crisis" which refers to the fact that SW development is difficult to scale. You can't make a baby in 1 month if you partner with 9 people of the opposite sex.

The article is suggesting if I understand it correctly that that is what the big IT departments have been trying to do.
It seems like these are a bunch of scattershot points that don’t add up to a cohesive argument. On top of this, “answer for this other thing someone I’ve decided to associate with you said” is one of my least favorite debate techniques.
Is there any desktop Safari extension with uBlock Origin? I would be happy to pay for it.
> Do you own a home?

No.
Aggregation of this type of public data (face recognition, license plates, cookies, etc) can absolutely create new privacy concerns. We should have privacy laws that protect us from this type of aggregation. Whether those laws should extend to plane transponder data comes down to the tradeoff between loss of privacy/security and transparency gains.

What I don't like is the argument that purely because some piece of information is "public", we should allow companies to aggregate and sell this data.
Surely you need to provide some details to justify such an accusation.