skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sorry, but no. Those things used to be like that, but they aren't any more. It seems even ironic(no doubt you didn't mean it as such). Let me give you Poland as an example where the "right wing government lead by an ex-banker" has established the biggest system of social benefits we've ever had in the country(and won its second election as a result). Why are they considered right wing? Because they are social conservatives, pro religion in schools, against "lgbt culture", abortion etc. Then there is one of the oldest parties of the "left" (descendants of the old communist regime). Despite a lot of talk about social equity, "working people" etc, when they did rule the benefits available were one of the lowest since the transformation (that however may have been more a function of them being a band of thieves rather than ideology, but I digress), at the same time that "left" party had many people in there that used to be openly homophobic not that long ago. These are just two examples which many people will no doubt a lot to add to. Also, why are those terms of left/right so meaningless in my country today? Mainly because two opposing camps now are not divided between left and right, but those that don't want the thieves to get back in power(even if they disagree with a lot of actual policies of the ruling party at least most of them are not thieves), and the other camp that is convinced the ruling party tries to establish a fascist dictatorship so they prefer pretty much anything else. There are more nuanced points to make, but this is the gist of it.

In a sense you can see it applied to the entire EU. Social conservatives are described as fascist, homophobes etc while the other side is portrayed as horribly corrupt, inefficient, nepotic. And both sides of course say the other is the one that breaks the rule of law(which they both do). The economic policies disappear in all of this.
They can easily jerk off 800 guys at the same time without calculating D2F or anything else!

https://youtu.be/P-hUV9yhqgY
To be fair, public is not the same as easily accessible.
My first job out of college (2007) involved a lot of removal of early 2000s one-off custom payment processing code. Access DBs full of years worth of credit card numbers, code that just emailed the credit card details to the site owner without keeping a record, etc. It was definitely a different world. Most of them, I just switched to PayPal shopping cart and checkout. In retrospect, I didn't know wtf I was doing and probably shouldn't have been working on it.
Show HN: Get notified on Telegram when your keywords are mentioned on HN
Create personal feed of stories or monitor mentions of your brand, projects or topics you're interested in.

Planned alerts:
● Reply alerts
● Stories by domain name alerts
● New thread comments alerts
That is crazy they would have a website that looks messed up to ~87% [0] of their potential audience.

[0]https://www.statista.com/statistics/576473/united-states-qua...
It would be great to have all of that data. Even just being able to see the status of your own account would be interesting.
Elon Musk also accused an emergency rescue worker of pedophilia during a deadly rescue mission. He double-downed on the claim by elaborating on his reasons for thinking that the rescue worker was having sex with underaged Thai boys.

Elon wanted to completely destroy the rescue worker as punishment for insulting his high tech submarine solution over social media.
Flowers are not necessary either.
That would require others losing their freedoms.

If you're a dick, I need the freedom to say so, to encourage a boycott of your restaurant, to not invite you to parties, to protest your public appearances. All of those are consequences and important freedoms.
That is like the average FAANG-wealthy programmer buying a modest house with a loan. It has little effect on his wealth outside of the egregious display of his behavior.
TL;DR No, no and absolutely not.

Well established UK Wholesale operator Simwood had not one but TWO very good goes at establishing an independent low-level UK network (or at least as low-level as is possible, they wanted to become as close as was humanly possible to a full MNO).

They ended up hitting obstacle after obstacle in the usual protection racket vicious circle between so-called regulator OFCOM and the incumbent operators. IIRC they encountered difficulties at every step, be it obtaining an independent allocation of mobile numbers or anything else.

In the end, they threw in the towel on the mobile project because they refused to be "just another" MVNO reselling someone else's rebranded service.
I'm not sure why anyone expected twitter not to be run like another of his other companies. This freedom of speech play will always be secondary to Elon's whims.
Intentions are good, but these types of ideas need real world scrutiny.

There's a reason why social media entities have become walled gardens. Some used to have RSS but removed it. Then they restricted anonymous viewing. Then they motivated users to use the app instead of the website. This isn't just driven by pure evil, it is fueled by the need to keep the lights on.

Running a social media behemoth for the masses costs billions per year. They need to keep online a staggering amount of content forever, develop lots of apps, have teams in every jurisdiction, comply with laws, it's a massive operation. All so that you can use it for free (with ads).

Why would these "hoarders" of social content open up using RSS? It's suicidal.

You cannot escape the monetization question. The Mastodon model moves this cost to individual volunteers, which will not scale to billions of users. The typical instance already has to stop registration after a few thousand users, media content is regularly purged, and instances constantly come and go, so your cohesive "identity" is based on quicksand, as well as subject to inconsistent and arbitrary moderation.

Apart from that, the RSS idea doesn't go beyond the aggregation of reading content. Say that I follow your social feed that way, how do I talk back? Where will my comment be posted? At which service? At which of the various sources that make up your combined feed? Who pays for the hosting? Who moderates? Who gets to see it? Who gets notifications? Which service pays for managing notifications?

What about a like, heart, retweet, all the various types of amplifications? In a decentralized scenario, what does this do, if anything?

What about discovery? How do I discover people to follow and relevant content? Supplying the current effortless experience?

How does blocking and privacy work in an open feed? I'm subscribed to your feed but don't like a particular person commenting on it. So I block him. Who maintains/stores this block?

How do ads work? How does verification work? How do creator fees work? How do subscriptions and newsletter work?

All of these things are standard features of modern social networks that people have to expect. Reading content is only a tiny part of the total social media experience.
It's easily accessible. Here you go: https://globe.adsbexchange.com/
nope, I've still not had covid yet and I've been sick once in the last three years and with a one night gastro bug...

I've never been this non-sick!
The goal of those codes is to improve the communication, mostly between the airplane and air traffic controllers.

The one large issue with the IATA aircompany codes is that there aren't enough to every one in activity, even if you extend them with not allowed tokens (like numbers). Those codes were never meant to identify any entity in an atemporal matter.
> Sounds like you have a good handle on the actual problem, so why not criminalize that rather than restricting people's agency.

Sounds like I just wrote a counter argument to your idea of "consent". Where does it stop? "I consent to be murdered an eaten alive so that family gets one million"? In an ultra-liberal society, you'll always find somebody making the argument that if people consent to that, that "business transaction" should be legal.

The fact the parent claim that forbidding prostitution is "anti-woman" is laughable at best. It's anti-ultra-liberal, sure, but it isn't "anti-woman". What is anti-woman is men thinking of women as a mere commercial product.
AFAIK Flightradar and some others provide a VIP service for blocking flight data. Elon's Jet is blocked there, too. Ironically, the owner of the elonjet account even told Elon how he could hide flight information on these platforms...

> Last week, Sweeney noticed he couldn't locate Musk's jet, and realized Musk was attempting to hide his flight patterns from the @ElonJet using the blocking software Sweeney had recommended to him.

Source: https://techxplore.com/news/2022-05-college-student-tracks-e...
> I dont think it is valid concern in $currentYear

I don't care about $currentYear. My concern is about $nextDecade earliest, and future doesn't look bright from my perspective.

> Nowadays languages like e.g c# are partially created by community and foundations (.net foundation) on github

A foundation created by Microsoft for a Microsoft's cash cow language on Microsoft's OSS entanglement platform. Yes.

> but also it is oss.

I'm not talking about OSS, I'm talking about Free Software.

> I dont because it permanently decreases developer experience and the value added is not something that could not be achieved with single compiler

This is not what happened with clang vs g++/gcc. Also we have Intel's, Microsoft's and Portland groups compilers side by side for decades.

> I mean if you see room for improvement then go ahead and make PR instead of creating yet another compiler with its own bugs, quirks and wtfs

I prefer implementing language correctly in a compiler to force others to the same, spec-compliant behavior.

Otherwise compilers and languages divert, and lack of alternatives make everything much more complicated in the long run.
> He rode into twitter on a high horse and has walked back pretty much everything he's said since.

Rather like Keir Starmer and the UK Labour Party.
Allowing competing browser engines is actually included in EU's DMA, so it should be happening at the same time as sideloading and competing app stores.
> silver bullet to stop climate change alone

nothing will stop climate change. The earth’s climate will continue to change regardless of any human interventions
Elizabeth Holmes?
Understanding SPF, DKIM, DMARC for email security and deliverability
Because the rescue worker rightly said it was a waste of valuable time, of which there was little left, to try Musk's sub idea.
A panel. Panels spread over hundreds of thousands of square kilometres produce power averaged over that area, so they're much more consistent and predictable.

HVDC lines help with this a lot. It has gotten to a point where there are serious plans to build a long, undersea HVDC line from the UK to Morocco which, get this, is poised to cost less than the equivalent(GWh delivered annually) Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant:

https://xlinks.co/morocco-uk-power-project/

That's how cheap the combination of solar and HVDC is.
I think part of the reason AI is so attractive to VC money that previously went into crypto is that while the "cynical" sales pitch of crypto is selling unregulated financial products to retail investors in a legal gray area, the one for AI is abdicating direct responsibility by introducing a convoluted rube goldberg machine in the decision making process: there is a reason EU legislation for example grants residents the right to demand human review and justification for any automated decision (e.g. on insurance claims).

If you think this is a stretch consider that most "gig economy" VC money went to companies whose value proposition mostly consisted of skirting labor laws and other regulations (e.g. Airbnb opening residential space to tourism, Uber sidestepping Taxi regulations, delivery apps offloading liability to "independent" drivers, etc). "Disruption" to a large part often also refers to laws and regulations. Illegality (i.e. violating laws and regulations) only becomes a problem if you get caught and the consequences outweigh the profit.
I don't think GP is implying that it is OK to take risks with investor money. However it sounds right that you should get a longer prison term if you gamble and lose $8B than if you gamble and make some money on it.
Banks won’t do same day spot loans collatoralized by equity? Since when?
>Also billionaires are a symptom of a broken society.

They are the symptom of any society which allows unlimited private ownership of cooperations.
Just by probability alone some companies will grow by billions and any major owner will become a billionaire.

>we should probably just tax net worth over a billion at 100%.

Which, in this case, is totally equivalent to the government seizing Tesla or SpaceX. Billionaires do not have billions in cash, they are billionaires because they own assets, likely not very liquid, worth billions.

I really hate to be shilling for rich people, but "disown them" is not the solution. The real problem with billionaires is that they are both extremely powerful and unaccountable. Both of which is the fault of the political class, which both shields the rich from accountability and gives them power. The informal power is the problem here.

There is also a qualitative difference here. The billionaire who became a billionaire, because he built up a long term productive company and the billionaire who won in the positive EV Casino (the stock market) are not the same. The former might even be deserving (although I do not really like that word in this context) of some influence, as a legitimate representative of corporate interests.
It could be that the account was auto-suspended along with many other bot-accounts they suspended recently. So, algorithm?
KAS will never be popular so long as it can only be used with Rust apps. It's still nice to see how Rust can be used in this context, but maybe make it into a wrapper for something more flexible.
Well I personally have nothing to gain or lose from waiting for at least the account owner to comment (no tweets as of this moment) https://twitter.com/jxcksweeney let alone something from Twitter

I don't expect it to stop others though
I'm going to have to disagree. While basic startups may be best served by shopify anything with complexity should consider an API-First platform. B2B2C, Multi, etc. all benefit from the flexibility it provides. What is important is finding a SaaS with a true multi-tenant infrastructure so they can price based on usage instead of having a large yearly minimum contract value.

Startups can have great success going API-First, but it's contingent on working with the right company.
OK, you've convinced me.
His behavior can impact Tesla share prices, if it's bad enough. That has a large and direct impact on his wealth.
I'm building content analytics around the premise that less is more. There are certainly tradeoffs, but the Internet has evolved into something unrecognizable.

We should rebuild the basics to reposition the ecosystem.
Oh I'm pretty sure the IRS could figure out a cash equivalent.

WE

DON'T

NEED

BILLIONAIRES
The irony is that the pejorative phrase "Trickle down economics" was pure propaganda. Incredibly effective propaganda considering you are repeating it back like a stochastic parrot decades later.
"Looks like Yoel is arguing in favor of children being able to access adult Internet services in his PhD thesis"

That is definitely not insinuating he was a pedophile and claims to the contrary are outright lies. More insinuating he was advocating for Bad Things that let children be harmed.

It's a low blow and a stupid one, but it's nor an allegation of pedophilia.
I find this type of harm reduction discourse really weasely, I imagine you have no problem with www and email, that are also such free sepeech exteremes that allow harmful content.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems it is not holding memory anymore, at least for some prompts it says something like "I don't know what my previous answer was so I hope I'm not repeating it"
Looks great! Saw it earlier on Twitter when someone quote-tweeted https://twitter.com/RoyKishony/status/1602311320073805824.

Suggestion: if you are able to edit the post title, add a "Show HN" prefix, see https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html for more details.

Edit: Just realized why the tool's name seemed familiar ;)
> When in reality, you have a great deal of control. Marketing IS something you can control.

If every creator does marketing, then everyone is in the same position and nobody has control. Also, check out this research paper, published in Science, showing that popularity signals like the number of downloads and ordering by popularity increases the unpredictability of a music market, which is an opposite effect to what you expect. I suspect similar effects happen for game and other cultural markets:

Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science (New York, N.Y.), 311(5762), 854–856.
https://www.princeton.edu/~mjs3/salganik_dodds_watts06_full....
For me it is the plugins, themes, icons etc. As soon as there is a plugin you can't live without, there's no way back. I can't remember which one it was for me but when I saw a co-worker using it I had to give VS Code another try.

Migrating over is easy too as you can import your shortcuts with "Sublime Text Keymap and Settings Importer"
There are two things involved: CO2 emission inherent in operation and construction, and CO2 emission that just happens to be occurring today because of how the materials and electricity are presently generated.

The anti-EV argument is deliberate confusion of the former with the latter.

There is no inherent CO2 emission required in construction and operation of an electric car. This is unlike gasoline powered cars, where petroleum has to be involved in their fueling.

From a policy point of view, an EV that replaces a gasoline car is a good thing, even if there is at the moment some CO2 emission in the construction and operation of the EV. It reduces CO2 emission in the near term, while also pushing EVs down their experience curves to enable total replacement (and abolition of CO2 emission) in the far term.
The billionaires today are a different bunch than the “billionaires”[0] when I was a kid.

You’d think they would have risen up and stopped these new people from becoming rich. How hard could it have been?

[0] don’t righty know if anyone was a billionaire in the 70s
Unverified? The account is suspended. You can click the link and see that the account is suspended. I have just done so moments ago to confirm that it is still suspended.
> they are effectively already banned

And do you think that is consistent with an originalist view of the 2nd amendment?
Speedcrunch says the answer is 0.0200271516439577461. There's a difference of only 0.0000320002439577461 from Chat GPTs answer. Thats about 1/30000.
I think it is worth noting that web apps in 2007 weren’t up to the task…
Musk's legal defense in that case was he had made a joke. This defense worked, but it's worth noting that the plaintiff's lawyer was Lin Wood.
I'm sure he has a PR person, agent, manager, etc.

So yes it is their responsibility.
> Yeah, it's not like Google (and dozens of others) has an internal fork of Linux...

Doesn't matter for completely internal stuff. My concern is public code requiring non-public toolchains to compile. I have experienced this enough during the decades. I don't want to fight with this again.

Google doesn't want to touch Linux for their devices anymore, so they're building Fuchsia, but let's not digress...

> Multiple compilers and "competition" doesn't solve compatibility. It makes it more difficult. Although I'm sure there will be benefits, I'm not certain GPL will make compatibility easier. It hasn't so far.

What GPL brings to the table is strict openness, not compatibility. I can share my code and say that "It builds right on this $GPLd_Compiler", and people can get it and build it. This is what I like to bring to the table for anything I release.

I also wonder whether people would be this reactive to this issue if $company announced a closed source compiler with strict rustc compatibility.
“Shortage of nurses”

There is no such thing as a shortage of labor. There are only shortages of wages. They should have paid more.
Nah, because the rescue worker said he could shove his sub where the sun don't shine.

Note that the chief of the rescue operation did ask Musk to continue working on the sub.
Why would the location of the DNS resolver matter? If I am running a local DNS resolver, presumably it recurses to an outside DNs server. If my ISP blocks that, I can't use it.
No I don't think that's safe to assume.
Hell, even Android, which had built-in VOIP support in the default AOSP dialer app, had VOIP support ripped out. It now requires a third party app.
He created it for the thread.
Same here. "Treating" cancer seems way more profitable than "curing" it - at least, at face value. I'm sure a society free from cancer would be better off, but not sure that translates well to "profit", which I guess is the whole point of the thread.
Amplifying/republishing public data can lead to an increased security risk, whether you like Musk or not.

This idea is widely acknowledged, with key example being the EU's "right to be forgotten". Which upon request removes personal information from search results, whilst it typically does not remove said info from the underlying individual websites. The very principle here is that a republication (search result) very much can be a security/privacy risk.
It's because being standardized is more important than being easy to read.

Now that we can make clients that expand those codes for you, people are working towards a more standardized, more verbose language with a much larger lookup table and computer-friendly separators.
Nobody is saying that Elon and Twitter “can’t” change their terms. Just that it’s funny the guy who literally used this specific example to illustrate his commitment to free speech has changed his principles.

Everyone knew he was a thin skinned hypocrite who only ever meant free speech for things he agrees with. The news here is the proof.
First page basically said he is so sad he didn’t have time to clean up more evidences. And “pinky swear, I promise US citizen/ residents won’t be as fucked”. How cute, and I want to see the version of this he would write when an EU or non US country try to charge and extradite him.
I'm somewhat surprised by this and I'll give Elon the benefit of the doubt until it's more clear what has happened.
Three have always had a policy of age restricting things. I had to give them a copy of my passport years ago to be able to use tinder on my phone.
This is outstanding.
Not if you have licensing and immigration rules that make it impossible for new people to enter the field in response to a demand surge
Expectation Fields Are Real
A stark and refreshing contrast to the agendas of today where prostitution is defended under the guise of "it's the woman's right to choose". This highlights that most women in prostitution are not there by choice, but because they are forced into it.

The only bit I challenge is that prostitution is an extension of the patriarchal society. I think it's just plain bad in and of itself.
> I do think billionares are undertaxed

How does politicians profiting from them solve anything.
> How can either side get an accurate assessment of the other in such a short time?

Given the state of tech interviews, and what can be objectively determined _at all_, what makes you think more time would give you any more accurate assessment?
With only 8 disclosed 0-days this year in Chromium, this wouldn't bode well with security on already less than perfect Android.