skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> One thing they could do - legacy features (real mode, 16-bit protected mode, V86 mode, etc) are now an optional feature for which you have to pay a premium. They could just have a mode which disables them, and fuse that mode on in the factory. With Microsoft’s cooperation, Windows 11 could be made to run on such a CPU without much work.

Customers who need them could just emulate them. Almost everyone already does anyway (DOSBox, etc.)

Though, honestly, I highly suspect the die space spent to support those features is pretty small, and power dissipation concerns mean that it's quite possible there aren't much better uses for that silicon area.
> They should fix the wheel spacing

Sounds like they optimized it for their use case:

"The load of the robot is distributed almost entirely to the module frames rather than the glass module"
What existing electric trucks?
"This design is fine provided that you change all the infrastructure in the world" isn't a _great_ argument, honestly.
Eco arguments are what they are. Regarding accidents, making speeders drive slower will not make general population improve their driving. I wonder how many accidents happened because the driver of the slower car didn’t even bother to check their mirrors when changing the lane.
There was also some discussion of "What's next" at Kubecon as well and, somewhat to Steve's point, discussion about addressing complexity for both developers and operations. Layer on top of that tension between simplification and locking people into a vendor-specific abstraction.
Does Github still not have read-only repo access?
Look at Bela and Electro-smith Daisy, there are a bunch of simple diy synths made with teensy and some minimal components

https://bela.io/ https://www.electro-smith.com/daisy
It routes it as an IP4 packet, because it still is a valid IP4 address. Think of it as a way to let a stateless IP4.4 aware NAT router at the edge join two 32-bit networks together. An IP4.4 client could send a packet to a destination in that network by putting the address of the IP4.4 router in the usual IP4 destination, and the 'internal' IP address in the IP options header. No 'entire Internet update' necessary
At the moment some of those competitors may have spare supply because people weren’t interested in them before. But once that runs out, I don’t see a reason they won’t all run into the same problems as the RPi Foundation as they get in line behind them for the limited-available time at the fabs.
Oh yeah:

- My 13 year old son beta tested it for me. And yep, they're already talking about this stuff in school at that age.

- My original mockup was to have a dynamodb leaderboard with country/state scores, but I axed that plan after realizing IPv6 would be too hard to control compared to IPV4. It would be too hackable/spammable. Your average home user would have millions of source IPs to spoof with. And if I can't have some IP address throttling, I don't want to use capchas.
The problem with the Autobahn are the 120 km/h speed limits that are there on a sizeable portion of it for no reason.

They should remove all the speed limits, not add more.
So I had a C128D (replacement for C64, which was replacement for VIC20). I had also used a few CP/M machines at this point. I know why they put the Z80 in the 128 but I always felt it was just a stupid thing that the PM/Marketing team should have been told, NO. It would have reduced cost, shipping date, etc. This is a prime example where marketing made the decision without having a real compelling business case for doing so. They could have said 100% C64 compatible with and * that said, sorry no CP/M cartridge support and it would have been just fine.
This reminds me too much of solar roadways.

What about heat dissipation? Don't you want airflow under the panels?
I’m well aware of pkg mode in the repl, wasn’t aware of jlpkg though, that seems good.
That only really works if Tesla has a monopoly on electric trucks, though. They do not.
It is 5000% on single bet out of 100.. And 100% loss on other 96 bets... Which makes VC's return on total capital much smaller then 5000%..

But more important high discount rate means much shorter runway for startups.
The first third of The Gods Themselves could be written now and one might interpret it as being about our approach to climate change, it's just such a great examination of the problem of negative externalities, I had to re-read the start of the middle third a bunch of times before I grokked it but when I did it I was impressed with how well he gave us a means to empathy to those characters and their point of view (after struggling to figure out what the heck I was reading!).
In an ideal environment the operating cost of a Tesla Semi is about 1/3rd (conservative estimate) that of a diesel.

That environment is, again, very specific. But if your routes are short and predictable, you have massive warehouse space for solar, and you can get your average electricity cost as low as Tesla can then it pays off. 1 million miles in a diesel is going to cost well over $1 million dollars (including the price of the cab). With a Tesla Semi that cost is at least half… IF you can get the electricity cost low enough.
Ah I thought the interchange rates would be 1% higher for the best cards, not 0.5% higher

I guess the lowest tier cards really do subsidize the rest.
How to respond when a VC asks about your startup’s valuation
Proponents of unlimited speed Autobahn could argue: 1. The tourism value: I anecdotally know people visit Germany just for the Autobahn. (See Nürburgring, which is technically an Autobahn) 2. Sale of performance cars: The high actual minimum speed (from my experience you need to drive at around 150km/h in the middle lane, and 180-200km/h to pass on the left lane). Almost anywhere else in the world, the top speed of cars is irrelevant. In Germany, however, high performance cars (inevitably, German brand ones) can be desired for their better handling at speeds at or above 200km/h. 3. Germans collectively have excellent driving mannerisms and skills which were a result of unlimited speed. It is probably true that enforcing a speed limit today would decrease deaths, but the next generation would then regress to the mean.
I would be interested to see someone quantify the above points and compare them with the economic costs discussed in the OP article.
> There is a light-year-wide trench between thinking and proving you can do something.

It's easy to prove something isn't secure, one need only an example e.g. https://www.opencve.io/cve?vendor=rust-lang https://www.opencve.io/cve?vendor=hyper and so on and so on but there's nothing that's ever going to prove that something is secure from everything.

Thinking is the best anyone can do, and one of the most important things you can think about is where exactly you're going to draw the line.
no, it's chav in chav's clothing. this is promoting the company product using something that could pass as an experiment to the lay person. to those with spidey senses, this just reeks of "hey look what we did with our product!!!" as they pull some muscles reaching around to pat themselves on the back. probably going to be sore in the morning.
Driver in the middle gives better visibility and command and control of the road. I don't understand the negativity here when the guy presumably a truck driver's tweet 1. ends up on top of hacker news! 2. complains about something he hasn't test driven or experienced.

Look at McLaren F1 driver seating position [1] probably the best car ever made in terms of maneuverability, control and command of the road.

I can't stop wondering if these are coordinated attacks on Musk, let's give the truck a chance before piling on. If other Tesla cars are a guide it will be a game changer.

[1] https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/classic-cars/a12019...
They did report it to Apple, multiple times:

> I found it while on Monterey and reported it 2 times through Feedback Assistant, but it still happens on Ventura.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/lafargue/1883/lazy/ not to undermine the NYRB, but this is in the public domain, for anybody interested
You still have to look over you shoulder when merging and need the ability to shift your body to see in the mirror or to check where your tire is when backing up.

I get that lots of car drivers merge by faith, but you kill people and potentially spend time in jail in a CMV.

Local deliveries are far more dependant on this than OTR, and even the drivers of front discharge cement trucks with narrow cabs complain about this.
MV3 has some changes that are genuinely good, even if those may feel inconvenient to develop for, mixed in with the genuinely bad. For FF you can get the best of both worlds though since their MV3 implementation isn’t removing the controversial deprecations/plans.
> It is really not hard at all to comply with GDPR. Don't collect private informations you don't need, and don't share them.

The problem is, not all personal data corresponds to the intuitive notion of "private informations". For instance, I, as a U.S. citizen, would be violating the GDPR if I operated a dumb HTTP server that stores request logs indefinitely and does no other processing, such as "python3 -m http.server". (IP addresses are personal data, and U.S. authorities can make me turn over my logs; thus, I cannot store the logs for however long I want.)
Seems like they would have to do some grading to clear anyway, why not grade with some tilt.
I knew this was coming. Google said that they're committed to allowing userscripts in MV3, but they haven't even started the implementation. They're still in the proposal phase.

https://github.com/w3c/webextensions/issues/279
Usually the expected life is ~30 years. They may last longer. I do wonder if pests and moisture will be early failure causes in this configuration though. Then again, if it saves enough money, maybe that doesn't matter.

TBH, the part that lasts the least amount of time is often the inverter.
Most of those limits are for noise levels and surface conditions.
Despite having occasionally enjoyed letting ‘er rip at 160-180 (about 100-110mph), I lean towards a 130 general limit - having a kid changes a lot of one’s priorities, it turns out.

The author should have listed the fatalities by 100 million km driven - of course practically-empty Finland is going to have far fewer fatalities per 1000km of road than much denser Germany!
With tilted modules, you'd normally space them out quite a bit so the shadows of one aren't falling on the module next to it. If they're all flat, that's not a problem so you can space them closer. So, it makes sense that they'd get more power per acre than the conventional approach -- the panels are individually less efficient, but there's a lot more total solar panel area per acre.

That might not always be a good tradeoff, but maybe at least some of the time it is.
That is the thing that made me realize that this is not an official GitHub product.
Every single atom in my leg could want to go left in its personal capacity as an atom, but they will still go right when my brain decides to go right.

These people aren't in control. What they care about isn't a major factor to be using in decision making. One of the core principles of western law, culture and corporate organisation is to centralise control in a tiny group with extreme amounts of skin in the game.

And those people almost always bend to the incentives they are put under. Sometimes it takes a little time.
30$ a month is a ton to spend compared to something free like the Odin project.

https://www.theodinproject.com/

If you charged 10$ for it I would off already signed up. I actually want to learn front end React
Also covered here:

https://driving.ca/auto-news/technology-news/bmw-suspension-...
How is

> limiting personal freedom, and potentially potentially taking away a right people are used to

not a rational concern? Sure you might personally be of a different opinion, but to claim these things can’t be the subject of a rational argument is absurd.
Show HN: Creating a Fake News PyTorch Model with ChatGPT
The model (https://github.com/aidan-pf/fake_news_pytorch) takes Title + Text of News Articles as inputs and predicts whether or not it's "fake news". ChatGPT needed prompting to fix parts of the script, but it basically created the whole thing.
> The Rust community is easily the worst thing about Rust. The constant preaching and cult-like reaction to any criticism is very offputting.

I've seen more comments talking about this supposed phenomenon than instances of this phenomenon actually happening. I haven't really seen any examples of preaching and cult-like reactions, I just see people talking about how it supposedly exists somewhere.
But then we also had the cybertruck that seems stuck because of its design, or the hyperloop. It wouldn't be Elon's first dumb idea.
> It's pretty easy [...] to avoid this kind of detection.

And by rice's theorem, it is generally undecidable whether there are hidden modules loaded.

Static (or in this case maybe not so static) analysis of arbitrary code will never lead to 100% safety. You'll always need some static restrictions on what code you're even allowed to write.
Myth #1: is a non-reason to ban it. Non-usage of something is not a reason to get rid of something

Myth #2: I've never met someone who is like: oh if I cannot drive 200kmph I'll be late to my meeting. That's not why people drive fast. They do because it's fun!

Myth #3: Emissions are taxed. Car consumes more, so you pay more taxes.

Myth #4: You cannot push everybody to electric cars and then yell: oh but the electricity isn't clean...

Myth #5: This is the worst actually, it's missing a significant piece of information... which part of the fatalities happened > 130kmph?
> Actually it does.

What does what? Be specific.

> why don't we absolutely abandon things that clearly damage our health?

I expect that at least tobacco, will in the long run be permanently abandoned. But how is that relevant?

> Where are you from?

Why do you ask? I'm not in the habit of supplying PII to antagonistic randos in the internet.
More rational or less rational than the pro-limit concerns?
(Modern utility scale PV installations are already using automated cleaning solutions).

It is much better from POV of the cleaning robot maneuvering requirements. It's also much better in terms of single robot can access the entire installation.

But it's worse in terms of how much distance the dust should be pushed before it's off panel (as I don't see any gaps there)
Yes. EleutherAI is doing it, probably one of many:

https://www.eleuther.ai/projects/gpt-neox/
https://github.com/EleutherAI/gpt-neox
https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06745

They have a 20B parameter model. I think the primary dataset for these open models is The Pile: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00027 (web scrape, pubmed, arxiv, github, wikipedia, etc. There is a nice diagram on page 2 that summarizes the contents.)
Korg is really amazing; they're also doing faithful classic analog synth reproductions like the ARP instruments and their own MS-20 line: https://www.korg.com/us/products/synthesizers/
While what you say is true, these are nonetheless kernel bugs.

The kernel should never let any user process consume so many resources as to cause a system freeze.

The kernel must not only be able to preempt any user process at any time, stopping it to consume all CPU time, but it must also prevent any user process to completely fill a SSD or HDD, because that can prevent many programs from starting.
You may be thinking of residential rates which are many times higher
It's breaking a standard with a typographic style that, in my case at least, disturbs reading
"Glow works with the Charm Cloud to allow you to store any markdown files in your own private collection." So are we to presume that Charm Cloud is always going to be an intermediary between the user and their private collection? Seems like a vulnerable position place to be when using sensitive info captured in Markdown.
Is it common to bank only with one bank in the U.S?
ChatGPT bid for bogus bug bounty is thwarted
Most of these flaws are because Tesla optimized for efficiency/range/tco, and not actual driver comfort. After all, the driver is not the one buying the truck.

They probably figured they wanted that shape for maximum efficiency. However maybe that narrow shape forced them to go with the center driver and all the things the author dislikes.

The logistics of just slapping a couple screens are much simpler than designing and manufacturing an interior with physical buttons.

Also they'll surely plan to drop those mirrors anyway, and use the screens as mirrors (which solves his cleaning complain, cheaper truck, more efficient, etc).
For noise, they should either build a barrier or buy out the properties nearby, certainly not limit the speed.

And for surface conditions, repave the road.
There is really no easier path to high engagement on a tweet than dumping on an Elon venture. Not to discredit his opinion as a truck driver but I’m pretty sure his mind was made up when he saw the brand.
I love this thread so much. Every issue he mentions is obvious once pointed out.

This is a great example of something I repeat to myself all the time, particularly because I find myself surrounded by people who don’t: I might be clever and perceptive but I do not know better than the user.
Pretty hyperbolic. When I think of a dictatorial leader, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Pol Pot, NK's Kims, Putin come to mind.[0]

Did Trump (or any US leadership past or present) wield that kind of violent and absolute power over government and people?

> severe economic and social regimentation

Again, I think of NK, China's treatment of Uighurs, their Covid lockdown policy, etc.

The left and right have different ideas on what is good for the nation and they have some commonalities too. I think this is healthy. What's not healthy is demonizing the other side because of different perspectives and beliefs.

Ironically, this demonizing of other groups is actually more akin to fascism (not calling anyone fascist, just pointing out the irony in this case) as that is the strategy used against the opposition by real fascists. E.g. Hitler towards Jews.

On Reddit, the language used against anyone not aligning with the Left is downright scary and dehumanizing. [1]

[0] Dictator: a ruler with total power over a country, typically one who has obtained control by force.

[1] See r/politics
Sucks to have to drive this then.

If Pepsi believes it can cut its transport costs for certain routes by 20% it doesn't care how inconvenienced or annoyed you are.
Haskell could have (I don't know a library that implements this, but it's ~trivial)

do
x <- open filename `errorContext` ("failed to open " <> filename)
y <- readBytes x `errorContext` "failed to read bytes from file"

Rust has

let x = open(filename).with_context(|| format!("failed to open {}", filename)?;
let y = read_bytes(x).with_context(|| format!("failed to read bytes from file")?;

or if we ever get https://github.com/joshtriplett/rfcs/blob/simple-postfix-mac...,

let x = open(filename).with_context!("failed to open {}", filename)?;
let y = read_bytes(x).with_context!("failed to read bytes from file")?;
I have written another comment for a similar question, so I will paste that below:

---

I'm not sure I agree with the article's premises. Rust can be difficult, yes, but it can also heighten developer productivity above other languages. In Go, I'd have to worry about whether I checked for exceptions via `if err != nil` everywhere, while with Rust, I can depend on the compiler telling me if I haven't done so exhaustively, via the Result type. Same for having algebraic data types or, well, generics in general.

I will also push back on other commentors here saying Rust is not good for web apps and APIs, and I have found that to be the opposite of true. I read Zero To Production In Rust [0] (a great book by the way, all about creating a web API with actix-web and Postgres) and deployed an API that has not gone down a single time since deploying near the beginning of this year. It's as ergonomic as (and sometimes even more so than) any NodeJS or Go API I've made (as even though Rust doesn't have function overloading, actix-web and others have some macro magic they do behind the scenes to make it appear as if it does), and there were very few times I had to contend with the borrow checker. If there had been and if I were really going for speed, I would also have cloned everywhere that was needed.

When I write something in Rust and it compiles, I can depend on it to work, and to continue working. At the end of the day, use the tool that makes sense for your business, but I don't think Rust was necessarily a bad choice based on my personal experience with it.

[0] https://www.zero2prod.com/

---

From: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33714007
That’s advertising, not targeted advertising, isn’t it?
It’s a null deref.
Fair enough. TBH, a lot of it is that I just misunderstood him. I get the concern that this will spread the dirt over a larger area, including some of the space that really should have been usable for storage. It looks like a bad tradeoff in several important ways.
I meant specifically the 'dark' money smb claims to have given republicans.
ldr x9, [x8, #0x18]!
UK is not the only country to drive on the left of the road, including Australia, India, Indonesia, and Japan.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-_and_right-hand_traffic
Happily traverse the existing IP4 Internet, to an IP4.4 aware edge network. The point is that you don't need to modify any IP4 networks between the IP4.4 aware origin and destination routers.
Interesting idea. I've been toying with the idea of doing a ground mount install at home, but maybe I should try this instead to get more density. I love toys...
Again, Sellafield released quadruple the radiation of Fukushima. The west irish sea, english channel, the coast of Japan, and even the coast of California all have measurable but safe accumulation of Cs137. But you are not suggesting one Fukushima, or one La Hague. You explicitly said the thousands of Sellafields required to power the world with that level of regulation and incompetence with reprocessing were fine.

Suggesting that the several fukushimas a day you said was fine should be avoided was enough to earn me a condescending rant about how I don't understand radiation.

Demonstrate that known models of fluid flow and known bioaccumulation factors predict these levels will stay within safe bounds in such a scenario.

This isn't some fallacious broken logic, this is the exact same standard anyone who wants to pollute the ocean and says the amount is too small to be a problem shoukd be held to.
> If the needs of a society can be met with 3-4 hours of work a day

That's a very subjective question. Suppose we could have maintained a 19th century standard of living for everyone with reduced work, but without the scientific and technological advancements that we got by using that time to do even more work. Would you prefer a society where everyone works 15 hr weeks but the internet was never invented?
Larry is suffering from an autoimmune disorder - likely Hashimoto's. Dude developed PageRank and built one of the most successful companies on Earth. He can probably sit back and focus on philanthropy and flying cars...
It sounds to me like you are just providing a rationalisation for a closed mind.

There are plenty of smart people on the right, and lots of bad behaviour on the left that needs highlighting (and vice versa).
And of course it's only people in opposition that will do this.

We can't rely on the media because they are clearly partisan, so to dismiss anything beyond the media leaves you in an information desert basically.