skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because of criteria 0, 1, 2 these entirely depend on the individual. However, some papers which fit the criteria for me at the time were the following:

- Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.13456

- Structured Denoising Diffusion Models in Discrete State-Spaces https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03006

- Efficient and Modular Implicit Differentiation https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.15183

- Scalable Gradients for Stochastic Differential Equations https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.01328

- Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Constraints https://arxiv.org/pdf/1403.5607.pdf

- SE(3)-Transformers: 3D Roto-Translation Equivariant Attention Networks https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.10503

- DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular Docking https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01776
Apparently not, since every time Microsoft does something boneheaded that alienates their "command line devs" we hear about it on hackernews.
None of that justifies claiming the cost is due to gravity. The problem of getting to space is obviously affected by gravity, but the cost is dictated by other considerations. It's not like "oh well, gravity, we might as well give up because it's not possible to do much better."
If all one learns to do is only "asking the right questions", then how would you know if what the AI has produced are "the right answers" ?
If a video is demonetized it’s because YouTube doesn’t think advertisers want to advertise on it. They aren’t making money directly off the video either.
> It's quite tiresome to read the same objections as if physicists somehow hadn't thought of them.

Okay now do climate change and climatologists.

And most people just don't bother to read the article at all it seems. No better than reddit.

Changing gears, though, and trying to be more useful, if you want more coverage on this topic there's a note in Peter Woit's blog:

https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=13232

Points to another blog which attacks the "nightmare scenario":

https://tritonstation.com/2022/11/29/the-angel-particle/

I don't particularly buy that a gravity-only interacting particle "is not physics". If that is what exists, that is what exists. And we've already detected it via dark matter observations. So it is physics. What we can't do is ever really prove it other than by exclusion, but if we racked up a thousand years of failure, we'd have to accept that it was real (hopefully by then not dogmatically and we'd let any kid who wanted to tilt at windmill to go for it).

And Woit links to a paper on dark matter being only a right handed majorana neutrino, requiring no real physics beyond the standard model (plus three right handed non-interacting neutrinos): https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08930

And links to a comment on that in John Baez's blog:

https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2022/12/neutrino_dark_m...
>Unless you're a Mozilla purist, there's really no better choice on Windows at this point.

Oh, yes,here is.
It's the browers I chose to prefer to install, and its the only one i chose* to use on a daily basis.
> * The last round of job searching doing zoom interviews, I wore my hoodie for half the calls. If I had done this while job searching out of college, during my internship, or at my first job.. I would not be where I am today.*

That's not just status, it's got change over time mixed in.
I'm not referring to copying the actual style but rather copying the habit of wearing the same thing as a way to avoid spending time making the decision of what to wear. This concept was written about ad nauseam about a decade ago, with Jobs as the inspiration.

I don't assume Jobs was the first one to do it, and it's certainly more conspicuous that Holmes was copying Jobs' style, but I do assume that people like Zuckerberg copied Jobs directly as a result of hearing that this was some little productivity hack for Jobs. I associate this period as the same time the 'personal brand' was becoming more popular, and people started aping Steve Jobs as a way to either deceive people just through perception or as a good faith attempt to be like Steve.

https://medium.com/swlh/why-successful-people-wear-the-same-...

https://www.businessinsider.com/highly-successful-people-lik...

https://www.ctsolutionsglobal.com/post/2019/09/12/what-do-st...

https://www.businessinsider.com/steve-jobs-productivity-hack...

Here's an article that includes a quote of Zuckerberg explaining himself, which makes my speculation less of an assumption:

https://careers.workopolis.com/advice/the-reason-mark-zucker...

> “I really want to clear my life to make it so that I have to make as few decisions as possible about anything except how to best serve this community. There’s actually a bunch of psychology theory that even making small decisions, around what you wear or what you eat for breakfast or things like that, they kind of make you tired and consume your energy. My view is I’m in this really lucky position where I get to wake up every day and help serve more than 1 billion people, and I feel like I’m not doing my job if I spend any of my energy on things that are silly or frivolous about my life, so that way I can dedicate all of my energy towards just building the best products and services and helping us reach our goal and achieve this mission of helping to connect everyone in the world and giving them the ability to stay connected with the people that they love and care about. So, that’s what I care about. Even though it sounds silly that that’s my reason for wearing a grey t-shirt every day, it is true.”

> He then pointed out that others throughout history have done the same, like Steve Jobs, who was usually wearing a black mock neck.
If it's not a base-model. If you're one of the unlucky shmucks running an 8/256 M1 Macbook Pro, you'll be lucky to get $500 for it on the secondhand market.
By whose definition?

You don't _have_ to define it that way. To _choose_ a definition that ropes _everything_ under "Physics" is an unnecessary move, it's more magic trick than grounded derivation.
>The eye doc said it was just some pieces of the inner eye drying with age, and normal.

Same thing happened to me around my late 20s and my doctor said the same thing (so n=2 now).
Based only on personal experience, I think Scottish folks are screwing with us just to see what we’ll do.
Windows update frequently break my laptop. For instance, one time the speakers just stopped working. That eventually got fixed. And recently (and still broken) .local mDNS lookups I use to ssh into my Linux desktop to code no longer work.

I dread what my laptop will be like when I hear it whir awake when closed.
They have tried this with juvenile non-human primates! For example, Horner & Whiten (2005) tried this with 2-6 year old chimpanzees. Clay & Tennie (2017) tried this with juvenile bonobos. Neither group overimitated. They do play, but overimitation is probably underpinned by the ability/proclivity to infer Gricean intentions, which non-human primates lack.

There is a strong normative element to this, as well as the play element you mentioned — I expect, as adults, we’ve all engaged in some form of overimitation as an act of conformity.
One with nature: My story about Sauna culture
Bada bing a counter example?
It doesn’t appear that you read the article. Social science journals definitely are organizations, businesses and/or single entities that could change.
EVGA Auctions Unreleased RTX 4090 GPU for Charity, $6,200 and Rising
The meaning of my kids’ lives is theirs to find. And the meaning I’m talking about is simply something I see. Like I noticed some issues around the lack of meaning I used to have had more or less disappeared. Nothing too logical.
The Macs are somewhat overpriced (especially the upsells for more RAM and storage), but I'd still consider one once you can get rid of the horrible operating system that comes with it and Asahi Linux works fully (external monitor/Thunderbolt dock support is what I'm most interested in).
MS open source is a recent marketing PR effort, not a business model.
Yes, this is the concept, and the NCC report correctly identifies a lot of deltas with reality, which also I outlined in my comment above:

* Google or a privileged attacker sitting at either end of the VPN could exfiltrate the user's identity through packet inspection and unencrypted personal identifiers in the user's VPN traffic, both obvious identifiers like plaintext data on the network and less obvious identifiers like specific subdomains or IPs correlated to a specific set of identities. This is a fairly fundamental problem with all "privacy" VPNs - as soon as you've exposed your identity by logging into a service over the VPN link, you're fairly easily unmasked again to a privileged attacker.

* If the authentication and VPN services have timestamped logging, the user's identity leaks through this side channel. At Google scale of course there's still bound to be some mixing, but it's a lot more granular than a key rotation period.

* A privileged attacker could also perform network analysis between the authentication and VPN services as well to achieve the same goal.

Perhaps Google have some lightweight countermeasures against these types of attack (even a random some-milliseconds timing at the client side between receiving a signed blind token and using it to establish the VPN connection would help a tiny bit), but if they do, they weren't outlined in the report.

My takeaway from this is "Google made a fine VPN, but it's nothing ground breaking, and so-called Privacy VPNs are still not a thing." Depending on your threat model a VPN is still a very useful tool, but none of them can truly anonymize you.
"a massive unforced error, like the Chinese government going after all its internet giants with a hammer"

Depends on who's viewpoint you're talking about. The Xi and CCP are so far presumably very happy with the results, because those companies are no longer much of a threat to their power.

Who made the decisions to end New York's sustained growth?
Compared to freezing to death, still pretty cheap. It’s worth noting, that 10x current electrical consumption is assuming a conversion (with electric) using very efficient heat pumps to produce the heat when using electricity.

If doing resistive heat, it’s more like 30x.

Even if everyone somehow had enough heat pumps, installers, and capital to switch the entire country to heat pumps, the electrical transmission grid would collapse long before it could work, even if generation (historically an issue) wasn’t a problem during these coldest days. Which it tends to be, and has gotten worse with the switch to renewables.

This was a known issue that could have been addressed with several decades of prior notice, but at great expense.

So wasn’t.
My experience leaving Windows was like yours... until I did a software upgrade or had to replace my graphics card, etc. Hours of fighting the command line, glitchy graphical bugs. For me, the desire to cultivate my linux computer like a garden ended up being a distraction from using my computer like the tool it is. Just my 2cents.
>Yes, safety requirements which include the double buffer of two trained and experienced human pilots being in physical command of the plane double checking themselves and the software/hardware

A lot of hardware/software is totally automatic and it would be insane if it were constantly checked by humans. Of course none of these systems running totally automatic have the ability to push thevplane into the ground based on faulty sensor data.

My point was that the failure of the MCAS was institutional, you should not be able to bring software like that onto a plane.

On the topic of the number of pilots my thoughts are that the redundancy is for the most part only neccessarry in exceptional situations. But exactly those situations are the ones in which the best thing a plane can usually do is graceful failure and handing control to the crew, which can far more easily overwhelm a single pilot.
I remember buying a bunch of ALR EISA 386 boxes that were about the 10% less than an IBM equivalent (Model 70/80). The big difference was that we could re-use some of the cards in our existing machines, and back then that was $1500-$2k in saving per machine. You are very right that PCI killed MCA.
People always make this argument, for at least the last 10 years. Since Apple has not yet shown any real action towards reducing their dependency on China, why would it be any different 5 years from now?
* multifocal contact lenses https://www.reviewofoptometry.com/article/add-multifocals-to...

* I sit by a window, so I end up naturally staring off

* night shift and dark mode https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2689610

* always with ambient light around me, never in the dark
Don't worry about "eye strain." Muscular use of eyes has no long term effects. Eye dryness does probably does but I don't know much about mitigating it.

Blue light affects your circadian rhythm, use blue blocker glasses, use F.lux. Adjust phone and device brightness to be the minimal amount you're comfortable reading. Don't use full screen brightness at night, especially because your pupils are more dilated in lower light environments. Use dark mode everywhere you can.

Blue LED light may be toxic to your retina with long term exposure. The jury is still out on this one, but the above steps will help mitigate the issue.

The other issue is emmetropization and nearsightedness. Incredibly important to understand for children. It will affect you too if your eye prescription continues to change. It usually stops in your 20s (your vision stops getting worse), but for some it continues to degrade past that. Holding things close to your face keeps your peripheral vision in focus, making your eye think it's over-focusing, so the eye grows longer (more near sighted) to try to correct. This happens without the brain's involvement, it's all based on focus on the retina. Your eye doctor should know about this process, should know about low dose atropine, and should know about glasses with fogged edges, especially for children. Most don't.
Rtp Live Slot Tertinggi Hari Ini
RAMAIBET adalah situs slot dengan rtp live slot tertinggi hari ini
https://markwhen.com/ is really well done!
Adding a link, to make it easier to find.
Thanks for sharing! That’s exactly it. I really do think that we have the technology and ability to return to a sort of technological advanced system of hunting and gathering with some agriculture. In that, we could apply just enough automation to simplify our lives but then go about just living. Today, life is a never ending grind and to what end? We work and work and work towards the goal of only retiring when our bodies and minds are spent.

Capitalism is a failure in this aspect. Humans become a machine to grow more capital at the cost of quality of life and the environment.
The GPU drivers tend to be proprietary.
JITs do indeed modify already-compiled code. For example, JavaScriptCore has a notion of a "patchable jump." These are jump instructions intended to be modified later. They may initially point to slow paths, and are later patched to point to faster paths as type information accumulates. https://webkit.org/blog/10298/inline-caching-delete/
>Sounds a lot like fuzzing, which is a really good way to find really esoteric bugs against a spec!

QuickCheck style testing is maybe also worth a mention here. Instead of using any possible inputs, like in fuzzing, you restrict yourself to legal inputs, like the keywords here, to get maybe less random crashes, but more likely to find useful corner cases because of the restriction on the search space.
But we evolved to live during the day. Our eyesight get sharper in darkness thanks to pupil dilation, which mean people would feel it is better to read code in a dark room, but since we evolved to look at things in the sun maybe keeping the pupils dilated and eyesight sharp is the cause of the strain.
A New Protein Design Era with Protein Diffusion
They work great, but are terrible for video calls as they reflect the light back so your eyeglasses look like "mirrors" to others on the video call.
If Google's VPN used Tornado Cash's protocol, they wouldn't be able to take the proof of having a session key back to Zinc to determine who asked for that to be signed. (if we assume Zinc is malicious) The protocol used looks like it was to provide anonymity with third parties, but not anonymity to the first parties. Google also links to the paper from 1982 that they're referencing. [1]

[1] https://www.hit.bme.hu/~buttyan/courses/BMEVIHIM219/2009/Cha...
It is a chronic problem with Windows that Microsoft tries to stuff products I don't want up my nose, up my fingernail and toenails, into my pores and into other unmentionable body orifices. This has gone back to at least Win 98.

OneDrive, OneNote and many other Microsoft products have, I think, been much less successful they could have been because Microsoft worked really hard to kill them. I'd like to see a culture change at Microsoft where they stop doing this -- it's what I'd expect from that mobile OS that has a trashcan for a logo, not from the market leading desktop OS.
Weird take since NASA's Artemis page on landing humans on the Moon opens with a giant rendering of Starship on the Moon[1] and their plan[2] for getting to the Moon involves ~6-8 Starship launches plus orbital refueling against 1 SLS launch. So NASA's Artemis program leadership doesn't seem to assess that Starship is "some intangible futurist idea" that won't work anytime soon due to engines/fuel/etc.

[1] https://www.nasa.gov/content/about-human-landing-systems-dev...

[2] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d9/Ar...
I maintain a tiling window manager for Windows[1]. It's the only thing still keeping me on Windows right now. I run NixOS on WSL, and I have a separate NixOS desktop partition that I iterate on from time to time.

Once I can make my tiling window manager X11-compatible, I think that will be it for me and Windows. The last update totally screwed me to the extent that I had to go into the registry and manually set my user profile path to get all my settings back, all because the update couldn't handle a symlink in the C:\Users dir, which I had to use because there is no sane way to do something as simple as changing the user directory name.

[1]: https://github.com/LGUG2Z/komorebi
much cheaper than $30 25MHz 16bit/50MHz 8bit cards they are using?
What about the fact that I have no idea what credentials he has with regard to analyzing the banking system vs crypto? Please don't disregard my perfectly valid question as an ad hominem attack
Per my other comment, it's not the copying of the style but rather the copying of the behavior / habit:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33946519
If they bounce then they interact with some force besides gravity
Unfortunately, Germany's currently problems are self-inflicted and were entirely predictable. They were encouraged to build LNG terminals and reduce their reliance on Russian gas back in 2014:

Following the 2014 February coup in Ukraine and Crimea's reunification with Russia, the administration of Barack Obama, the 44th President of the United States, called upon the EU member states to cut their reliance on Russian gas, citing "security" reasons.

Speaking at the March 2014 EU-US Summit in Brussels, Obama urged the US' European allies to hurry up with the conclusion of the controversial Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), offering US liquefied natural gas (LNG) in exchange.

https://sputniknews.com/20180331/obama-trump-lng-europe-china-1063093406.html

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-eu-summit-idUSBREA2P0W220140326
It seems like this response uses the word job as a justification, but I'm not particularly convinced. I can hire a hitman and that has no bearing on what they're doing is ethical. Conversely, people do nice things for each other outside of jobs all the time. It seem to me that making something a job has no relevancy at all in this discussion. There are a million ways to argue for cops, but repeating that it's a job ain't one of them.
There are but it's considered a personality disorder.

There are folks that are genuinely uninterested in social status, and it usually goes along with being uninterested in social relationships. Think of autistic/Asperger's individuals; certain psychopaths & sociopaths; people with schizoid, schizotypal, avoidant, or antisocial personality disorders; et al. No relationships = no status = no need to worry about social status and social signaling.

It's much like how where there's people, there's politics. Where there's social, there's status. Take away the social and you take away both the performance and the status.
It's really miracle tech, I'm not sure if people really understand how good it is. I've got a library of ~300 Steam games, and less than 10 of them don't launch with Proton. I think I've had more problems on Windows...
Everyone struggles with iTunes. And every update makes it worse. I’ve used it on Mac and Windows and both suck
I think you're not understanding my question. You said that the most exciting feature of JPEG XL is the ability to losslessly encode old JPEGs. My point is that, if this is the most exciting feature, then it's unsurprising that the industry is choosing to ignore JPEG XL as the "most exciting feature" is more or less useless.

Technology is a means to an end. Transcoding images is a means. The end is what you do with it. In the 90s and early 2000s, encoding images in JPEG allowed for digital cameras to store vastly more images on their limited storage space. Bandwidth was extremely limited, so JPEG encoding allowed for detailed images to be shared over the web, which wouldn't have been possible in a different format. Today, however, storage and bandwidth are cheap. JPEG already does a decent enough job for old images. Making old images even smaller isn't really enabling any new "ends."

I guess the ultimate question I'm asking is "Why do you want your old JPEGs to be smaller?" What is the end you hope to achieve with smaller JPEGs?
1. Keeping all my displays at low brightness and adjusting the room lighting to more or less match it.

2. Dark mode everywhere I can. Unless an app has completely terrible (e.g. low contrast) dark theme.

3. Desk never facing a wall, rather open room. Let's me rest my eyes at something farther away than my monitor.

I don't bother with f.lux or similar. Find it a bit pointless and annoying. Much better to lower the brightness.
> Hey we found those issues in so and so papers, we identified mistakes of a dozen other scientists and we do our due diligence. Please hire us!

I think it's a lot about the phrasing.
Enso – Get insights you can rely on. In real time
When I was doing my physics masters (at a pretty good school ie had a couple of nobel prize winners) there was at least a handful of students whose phd projects involved "testing" theories of gravitation and pushing them to their limits.

Not quite the same as experimental replication, but along the same lines I'd say.
And definitely worth a skim,

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_le_Carr%C3%A9
Whether or not that's the case, it's obviously possible for loose-knit organizations to change. That's basically the role of philosophy, or more specifically, convincing people to do something different with argument.
no, but we can have AI hallucinate alternative "pretty looking" version
I use flu.x to set my color temperature to 5900K instead of the default 6900K. Makes a huge difference.

I use dark mode.

I also make sure to look up and outside the window at least every 15 minutes.
Doesn't it drive you crazy to lose your work whenever X11/Wayland crashes, or you have to kill your display server to diagnose a problem, or you accidentally close a terminal window?

tmux preserves everything for you unless you explicitly kill it, or you have to reboot.

I started using Screen like 20 years ago (and later moved to tmux) and I can't go back to doing real work in a "bare" terminal window. It would feel like walking on a thin layer of ice on a lake; as soon as something goes wrong, it's a minor disaster.