skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Protection from liability when aware of a crime and responding accordingly; that’s exactly what 18 U.S.C. 2258A gives corporations, in the context of child sexual exploitation materials.

Sadly, I think you will find we don’t have any constitutionally protected privacy rights. We used to have some, and that’s where the protection for abortion rights came from, but the current court (at least in my interpretation) believes that interpreting the Constitution that way was a huge mistake. We still have some remnant of these rights, but as they come up for review by the Roberts court, they will be abolished one by one until they run out of time or we run out of patience with them and enshrine these rights in statutes.

But I think when you say privacy rights you mean “fourth amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure” and insofar as that’s the case, I agree with you: Apple has a lot more power to violate these rights than most people think, because they have smart lawyers who have advised them exactly how much leeway they have before they become “state actors”; their software stops just shy of that point.

I think one thing that’s important to remember is that Apple has a lot of power but only because we give it to them. All you have to do to avoid this hash scanning nonsense forever is just throw away your iPhone. (The problem is, at least for me, I’m not ready to do that).
I do a sort of language-per-year thing for my sins. My previous two were clojure then elixir, Then this year it's been Rust. I've found the Rust community by far the least pleasant to deal with. For the most part, it is fairly helpful (though no more than the others). But there is an implicit contract that to get help you must admit that Rust is the best thing ever, and that if you have any difficulties with it, you agree that it's because you're a bit thick or lazy. Stay within that lane, and smiles & help will abound.

I'm not quite sure why the Rust community is so dogmatic about the language's intrinsic excellence. I never found anything similar with the clojure or elixir communities (which each has its own distinctive style of response to beginner difficulties). My speculation is that Rust has such a strong inclusiveness mandate (which is a good thing in my view), that intrinsic difficulty is threatening to the group's identity. The impulse therefore is to deny the difficulty, from which it's a short step to pointing to the beginner as the source of the problem.
The only requirement we've been told ...
He wrote the foreword to Dr. Thorpe's book and it was just a rant against 'academia'. Reading the book, A Man for all Markets, showed that academia was, imo, a foundation for his success and the basis of his successful investment ventures, with some notable reasons that caused him to exit his tenured position. The foreword was imo pretty much a non-sequitur and did not improve an otherwise excellent read.
Seems to be quite common practice for some news outlets here in Germany. I remember that I read a court decision stating that this would for some reason be acceptable. Not sure if it really is though.
My Rustic Omelette seems reasonable:

rustic omelette

by le chef

Ingredients

2 tablespoons butter

1 cup onion, chopped

1/2 cup green pepper, chopped

4 eggs

1/4 teaspoon salt

1/4 teaspoon black pepper

1/8 teaspoon garlic powder

1/8 teaspoon onion powder

Directions

Step 1: Melt butter in a skillet over medium heat.

Step 2: Add onion and green pepper; saute until tender.

Step 3: In a large bowl, whisk together the eggs, salt, pepper, garlic powder and onion powder.

Step 4: Pour egg mixture into the skillet.

Step 5: Cook for 3 to 5 minutes or until set.

Step 6: Flip omelette over and cook for another 3 to 5 minutes or until done.
So I found the original thread (https://raspberrypi.social/@Raspberry_Pi/109477121398103132), and I must say these irreverent responses from the Raspberry Pi account are raising a smile from me, it's refreshing to see someone not taking those po-faced complainer types seriously.
Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion
It's a horrible architecture. Every iteration on top of it made it even more hideous. It's a unnatural thing that should have never been. Every time an x86 powers up, it cries in despair and begs to be killed.
Note that this recipe is raw spinach (with raw garlic)
I also have tinnitus (mainly in my left ear, but applies to both), since February of 2022. It also makes me to feel unbalanced sometimes, but I can still walk anyways.

The doctor made blood tests, blood pressure, and a few other things, and found nothing wrong.

Doctor told me to go to ENT specialist. The specialist tested my hearing, and examined my ears and nose and throat (he only examined my ears/nose/throat at my insistence), and found nothing wrong.

Because I also seemed to have a vision problem, I also went to optometrist, and they made vision test, eye pressure test, and visual field test; the only thing they found was blepharitis.

(At least, I did not have to pay for it.)

There may be side-effects of COVID-19 vaccine (which may have a long enough delay before it occurs, that it was not known at first), and I don't know if that is causing me to have tinnitus and headaches. Maybe it is because I have had too many booster shots of COVID-19 vaccine, so maybe it is overdose.

I will also read the other comments here.
I had an PCW for ages. My dad got it so I could write up school reports. Screen was pretty crisp text. Main drawback is it uses a 3" floppy which was hard to find. Also only after purchase did I realize it was not IBM compatible.
Ironically, you're literally describing the 1% lifestyle. (That includes me, but I'm aware that most people don't get to enjoy the great lifestyle you mention.)
Same for the Go, Python, JS, Java communities. People will always try to “defend” what they like one way or another.

Also, what can you criticise about Rust? /s
oh and the facebook EULA is easy to ubderstand and grants you make rights and protections?
I heard his convenient excuse too and I'm sure this known fraud and pathological liar trying to keep his criminal ass from going to prison was in fact telling the truth. SBF is just reminding the recipients he has the receipts.
Commodore kept selling the 64C until it entered chapter 11 in 1994, actually. It was the 128 that was an embarassing dead end, but the 64 had a huge base of software and there was still a market for a dirt cheap TV-connected home device for all the purposes for which it was ever useful.

It's hard to remember how fast things changed in the early era of computing. The killer app that finally put the knife in the 8 bit home computer was... the web browser.
I don't think many lessons about a potential world war could be gleaned from Ukraine. A world war is going to necessarily pull in all of the major powers which means that there won't be a single front, navy and air force will be involved and strikes deep into territory on all sides will happen via missile, bombers, and drones. In short, it would be chaotic and fast moving with destruction happening everywhere. The involvement of satellites is terrifying since they would be a prime target and would likely be one of the first major casualties.
CSS sourcemaps, being a basic assets in frontend tooling for many years, are still unsupported in Vite(https://github.com/vitejs/vite/issues/2830). Being an open issue for that long, while sourcemaps are supplied for free with tools like ESBuild & SCSS, are perhaps an indication of too much complexity in Vite? About build performance; ESBuild(and SWC as well) happily build large projects within reasonable time(<200ms). I doubt that skipping bundling all-together, by using ES-Modules during development, is worth the extra hassle in tooling. It made sense during the Webpack/Vuepack/Parcel 1 era, but not that much anymore since ESBuild happened. Spending some extra time in writing a custom buildscript (ESBuild + SCSS + simple async task manager + Chokidar + Tinylr or something similar) pays itself back really quick when a project gets larger.
My favorite so far was a company I founded about 20 years ago with a friend who worked in the film sound industry. He had an idea for a hyper-niche tool for automatically syncing changes from video to sound (industry term is "conforming"). He'd approached a couple people/companies he knew that made tools in adjacent spaces but got turned down with "that's impossible" or "it's not worth it". I had no experience in the space but I got intrigued just from a "can it be done" perspective and coded it up. Once written it required very little maintenance, it was just available on our website for download and we used a shareware service to deal with licensing and sales. Only marketing was word of mouth. Every time someone bought a copy the shareware service would send a text, so I set the text alert sound for their number to be the cash register sound. It was a small addressable market so didn't sell all that often but it was always a little dopamine boost to hear the "ka-ching" come out of my phone. Most sales only netted me a couple hundred bucks, but every once in a while a big player (like a movie studio) would pick up a bunch of copies at once. Eventually sold it off to a competitor and collected a small royalty stream for another few years.
That wasn't from an official rep.
Just like this new version of Vite..?
Wasn't Avatar 1 also available in 2D ? When 3D was NOT an amenity ?

Anyway, yeah, arguably even color wasn't "transformational" (sound probably was ?)

But then 3D films and TVs are pretty much offtopic anyway - unlike VR/AR compared to 2D (or even 3D) monitors, they don't radically change the mode of interaction compared to 2D films and TV... (not to say that VR/AR will be successful)
It's worth noting you can do something similar with Django & HTMX. These two combine to provide a DX in the same rough direction as Rails Hotwire and Phoenix LiveView (although the low-level semantics are different; it seems Pynecone is more similar to LiveView if I'm following correctly).

While I've not worked with it, one example of Djangonic Components might be Wagtail's: https://docs.wagtail.org/en/latest/extending/template_compon...

Interested in others' thoughts on what Pynecone will do better.
And then there was the place that (when I started) used Remedy. (Ever seen the ticket creation process there? Of course, only customer-facing people were supposed to create them.) That wasn't good enough, so they added a customized Jira for the devs to track their activities. (A Jira ticket had to be associated with a Remedy ticket, even for new development.) And finally, they slathered on a layer of Rally on top to make sure we were suitably Agile.

Fortunately, now, we're SAFe.
>But that's the thing tipping creates regardless of this. You don't know if you're going to get 10% or 30%. Abolishing this is the goal.

Yes, and a 0%-30% tip has more uncertainty than a 10%-30% tip.

Also you appear to be arguing as if I'm defending tipping as a practice. I'm not. I'm saying that an individual who refuses to tip despite it being an expected practice is being a bad member of society.

>Meanwhile a typical waitress has hundreds of customers per week. That's enough for a statistically valid sample without needing months to figure it out, and it's not likely to change dramatically overnight based on the actions of one individual customer.

You are arguing against your own point here. If a single customer is meaningless to the compensation of the service worker, that single customer is not making any meaningful dent in the system that goes way beyond that one individual service worker.

>New legislation eliminates some of their jobs, or requires them to work under different conditions because more restrictions are needed to justify paying benefits, or have their hours cut to below whatever threshold is needed to avoid paying them benefits even though they'd have chosen to work more etc.

This is true of any labor protections. Having a minimum wage eliminates jobs. Having safety regulations eliminates jobs. Sometimes eliminating jobs is in the best interest of society.

>The short-term interests of the customer are aligned with the long-term interests of the service worker and the customer is the one making the decision. That's a great alignment of incentives.

Try asking a service worker whether they would prefer a tip today or a hypothetical abolishment of tipping decades in the future. I don't think they are going to make the choice you are implying.
I've heard promising things about Nuitka so this will be a good time to try it out and see how .exe size compares to one generated by PyInstaller.

Also I think instead of undetermined donation amount a fixed $99 personal commercial license would be successful.
I’ve found Google’s Colab to be a pretty great deal for getting started and playing around.
It's very cost effective. A wind generated MWh costs about £25 while a nuclear MWh is more in the region of £120.

If you use wind to generate electricity and use that to synthesize natural gas which you store and use to generate electricity the whole thing costs about £80-90.
I was nodding along in the introduction, rolling my eyes in cognitive artifacts, and sighing in the conclusion.

It seems like math educators still loathe students use calculators, and I find the reasoning has major blindspots. Competitive artifacts abound in society, and we are better for it. If I am in a situation where I do not have immediate access to a calculator, I am not in a situation where I need to do quick math. In 20 years, if we're still asking what year WW1 started on history tests, then we utterly failed.

We absolutely need to find a way to teach programming in a world of AI. We also need to find a way to teach art in a world of AI. We'll need to find a way to teach everything in a world of AI. What we don't need to hold onto is this mistaken belief that we need to somehow teach people how to get by without it. It's like telling someone they need to learn all of a python framework before they're allowed to use it...utterly defeats the point of its existence.
What do you mean by making it to YC? I couldn't find evidence of any affiliation

Do you mean being in hacker news ?
Children can't enter into contracts either, we actually do not give them many of the same rights we give adults. This is because children are considered immature and unable to act in their own self interest. There have been "childrens rights" movements in the past though, it's not an uncontested subject...
The negative effects of social media on children are absolutely something we should be discussing. Kids spend an unbelievable amount of time online in these networks, and it's having a real consequences. We already require by law blocking access to kids under 13 in certain situations, so it's not without precedent.

Why would you think this is something that is so far outside the reasonable to not warrant discussion here or in govt?
"linux isos" in the context of storing lots of data is a reference to pirated movies/tv shows/etc.
Put more simply, backups account for and mitigate the common risks to data during storage while minimizing costs, ransomware is one of those common risks. Its organizational dependent based on costs and available budget so it varies.

Long term storage usually has some form of Forward Error Correction (FEC) protection schemes (for bitrot), and often backups are segmented which may be a mix of full and iterative, or delta backups (to mitigate cost) with corresponding offline components (for ransomware resiliency), but that too is very dependent on the environment as well as the strategy being used for data minimization.

> Usually this level of robustness isn't present in a "replication" setup.

Exactly, and thinking about replication as a backup often also gives those using it a false sense of security in any BC/DR situations.
Ten Minute Physics is a great resource! Matthias Mueller makes concise demos and explains them really well. (Though I think it would take someone without existing familiarity with the subject matter a lot longer than 10 minutes to digest the results. Lots of rewatching!)

A really interesting results that's come out of Matthias and co.'s research in the last few years that is still percolating its way through the realtime physics community is the so called "small step" technique. Explained at a really high level: integrating a physical system requires solving large sparse systems of nonlinear equations. Traditionally, the equations would be solved once a frame with iterative methods (often with a fixed number of iterations, such as 10 or 20 per frame). It turns out it's massively more efficient for accurate results to just run a single iteration of the solver, but increase the physics framerate by 10 or 20 times (or actually, since there's a tiny bit of overhead to process a physics frame, for equivalent computational load, you can usually only increase the framerate 9-18 times). The intuition here is that even though 1 iteration of the solver is much less accurate than 20, by only taking a small step forward in time the error drift in the physical system is even lower. It's only somewhat handwavy to say solver iterations reduce error at a linear rate, but decreasing physics frame time reduces error at an O(n^2) rate.

While almost all engines have added an option to use the small step technique, one issue slowing down adoption is that it is too accurate! The old way of solving the nonlinear equations once a frame introduced a huge amount of numerical damping. That greatly reduced accuracy, but did serve to stabilize simulations, in a way. With the small step technique, numerical damping is greatly reduced, so intentional physical models of damping need to be added back in and tuned by hand. People aren't used to working this way, so designers are still toggling back to the "large step" method. It's likely once people figure out how to properly use this new technique, you'll see a noticeable uptick in the fidelity of physics in games.
Maybe not the most expensive, but one of the silliest - AllAdvantage https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2000...
Don’t forget about WASM
Bomber mafia: https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/when-pop-history-bombs-a...

Roundup of a few (follow links): https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/02/29/the-patern...

If Books Could Kill (worthwhile, as is the Freakonomics episode of the same podcast): https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/malcolm-gladwells-outl...
Rust is my favorite language for embedded and writing desktop programs, including 3d graphics.

For backend web dev: Skip it. I prefer Python/Django.
Though wouldn't surprise. However, if it would be the case, I would probably attribute it the fact that GDP is a low quality metric (though potentially the best we have?)

As in: If a rich woman marries her housekeeper and he does the previous things as a part of the marriage, the total production is the same with a lowered GDP.
I doubt the sensitivity readers on today's R&M (or even more so, SNL) writing team would allow the word "crazy" to be used in this way. It marginalizes and stigmatizes mental illness.
Those prices are ridiculous but I guess they have optimized it and figured it's the best option.
Not at all scary, places that force return to office will get people that want it. Folks that want to be remote, will stay remote.
> He is unashamedly a teller of stories, not a scientific researcher. They are fun but should not be taken as accurate.

Real science is boring, wishy-washy and full of caveats, as they should be, researchers should disclose limitations of the studies. But because of that, it's not something the average person will find memorable or talk to a friend about.

Gladwell's popularity comes from the fact that his narratives are told with conviction and in a way that feels exciting. People respond to that, similarly to how they respond to confidence in interpersonal interactions.
Since you wont provide any evidence let me post some.

Libsoftiktok was put on hidden black list[1] by twitter because they where unable to ban the account as it did not break the twitter rules. (The rules obviously include the stuff you accuse them of.)

They repeatedly temporary suspended the account[2] and accused them of "hateful conduct"[3] similar to your accusation. Then later the highest "authority" on twitter internal confirmed "[they have] not directly engaged in behavior violative of the Hateful Conduct policy."[4]

The suspensions where then justified by a variation of your bogus accusations for "encouraging harassment"[5] while if that would have been the case they would have simply terminated the account.

And while not relevant to the content the account posted its still quite interesting that when Libsoftiktok got doxed, which is actually against twitter rules, they did nothing.[6]

[1] https://nitter.net/bariweiss/status/1601018810495995904#m
[2] https://nitter.net/bariweiss/status/1601019593606107136#m
[3] https://nitter.net/bariweiss/status/1601019900071288833#m
[4] https://nitter.net/bariweiss/status/1601020845224128512#m
[5] https://nitter.net/bariweiss/status/1601021201815457793#m
[6] https://nitter.net/bariweiss/status/1601022887556571136#m
From top answer:

> each character is compared to every possible control character before it is decided that it isn't one

That's crazy; ASCII was carefully designed to avoid this kind of shit.
He is unashamedly a teller of stories, not a scientific researcher

This implies he considers himself a storyteller but he does not. I recently heard him interviewed where he (rightly or wrongly) explicitly described his job as being a researcher.
Lots of people with no jobs, nothing to do, just sitting and taking the UBI? I think people will demand the right to work to support their needs. Even if that means just helping people get land, materials, tools and energy. People can't be passive wards of the state.
I agree with the premise of this bill — that social media are harmful to young people — but disagree with the conclusion that therefore there must be a law. There are lots of things that can be harmful to children, like television, busy streets, caffeinated sugary sodas, and weight training, and we trust parents and other adults to guide children through those dangers, teaching them wise self-restraint along the way. I don't see that social media belong to a different category of danger that requires legislation.

Parenting is hard, and not everyone succeeds, but that doesn't mean that we need to legislate away all danger, especially at the cost of privacy and potentially beneficial engagement with friends and family.
No idea why this is being downvoted. It's high time there were consequences for the USA's global warrantless surveillance. Every single country should do what Europe is doing.
How are you handling linoleic acid? I found switching to lard and butter to be a better health alternative for my gut flora after I experienced a period of strange digestive imbalances
Also do it like everything is depending on it, it’s even more fun :)
This is one of the several problems we’re trying to solve at https://polyfill.work
> It looks like this suit as all about users of Facebook and Instagram being forced to agree to tracking to use the service.

Is the reality that they'll be tracked regardless, just now through a thin veil of indirection (as with the shadow profiles)?
I wager though that if we grabbed a person from your culture from two thousand years ago they would find many differences comparing their experience of the culture with yours. It's inevitable that it will change and adapt over time. The only completely fixed culture is the one that has no participants any more.