skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Please do tell, how is it hilariously wrong?

It copies from user, and then copies to user, back into the const it got. I don't even know if this would compile but certainly nobody would expect the buffer they just wrote to a file to suddenly end up re-written with a "reply" when using a special file.

I found that logic very funny.

Edit: To elaborate, the actual code to do this properly would have to allocate some memory when the file was opened, this memory would hold the reply once a question was written. Then when the answer was read it would have to respond with that in there. Finally when the file is closed it would have to deallocate.

This code is quite far from accurate, the issue I have with the concept that even if this bot was 99% accurate, C is not a "try it and see" language. If you apply "try it and see" techniques to C you just get subtle undefined behaviour which you might not notice until someone uses it to remotely execute code on your machine. Really I am not so sure that even humans can be trusted to write C but at the very least I am well aware of all the instances where C is a minefield and can pay extra attention to those, if you simply look at the plethora of information on C out there to learn C and apply it to kernel development you won't automatically build these intuitions no matter how much code you read because an enormous amount of C out there is hideously wrong in many ways.

Final edit: Once you start looking at the details, it has managed to implement a bunch of buffer overflows to boot.
i dont think it s anywhere nearly apt comparison . GTP will give you a full opera score where you can finetune some notes
If you earn an american salary, by that I mean from an american company and in USD, you'll have no problem living comfortably in an upscale neighborhood i.e. the safest and with lots of amenities. The reason is, not only you are paid in a strong currency (compared to the local ones) but also the quantity is higher.

Now, by violence I mean mostly all things stemming from drug-trafficking (hitmen, kidnappings, racketeering, extortion, carjacking) most commonly found in central america but expanding to southern countries more and more. The safest cities were historically Montevideo in Uruguay and Santiago in Chile, I may be biased but I think Montevideo is still safe and I'm not sure about Santiago, unless you choose to live in the eastern side of the city [0]. EDIT: you may want to factor political instability in your decision. I encourage you to ask other expats about their experience and what they see in the future, they're well-off so they they're lucky to avoid unpleasant experiences the local population has to deal with (plus they can always return to the US). I personally would only live in Chile and Uruguay, so take what I say with a grain of salt.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeastern_zone_of_Santiago
10k€ is not bad amount of money for work that probably wouldn't not have ended up as anything big outside books. Just try to think how many other fantasy works there are that never got outside books or small derivative works.

Surely he made decent chunk from increased sales of books and now the TV series.
Out of the 1500 animals, more than 80 percent were mice. Seems an important fact to leave out.
You are trying way too hard to shift the blame here. I wonder why that is?
Perhaps, if we encourage more people to use privacy preserving tools like Tor browser, signal, etc., then privacy for everyone will be normalized again. One can only hope
The database is generated by the NCMEC[0]. I trust them to have a rigorous process for adding stuff to it.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Center_for_Missing_%2...
Or a good understanding of the Dewy Decimal System
To be fair, it's only a 10 minute bus journey from Oxford's train station (albeit on the ST2 line which only runs once an hour).

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Oxford+Station,+Park+End+St,...
Location: Saint Petersburg / Russia

Remote: yes

Willing to relocate: yes

Technologies: Kubernetes, Argo CD, Helm, GitOps, IaaC, Ansible, Prometheus, Grafana, Loki

Résumé/CV: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1odIZl7jYHjUevzAmUllcdC9zEw9...

Email: eugene.0x90@gmail.com

---

English: Intermediate (B1)

Looking companies with russian language :)
So on top of having to raise the seat to pee, we now have to lower the lid to flush?!
Stay alive. Stay in the country where I live. Get some new assignment. Have the capacity to work. Survive.
Published paper:
Commercial toilets emit energetic and rapidly spreading aerosol plumes https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-24686-5

Related:
Lifting the lid on toilet plume aerosol: A literature review with suggestions for future research https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692156/
Reading this, I was reminded of how I used to think when I was in art school and the world seemed limitless.

At some point in the last twenty years, I became thoroughly grounded in the capitalist, entrepreneurial mindset. My world view became locked on the lens of monetary compensation, property ownership, and proper assignment of assets.

Unlike many of the commenters here, I have no interest in the legal or monetary ramifications of this post. Instead, this gives me pause. I need to reexamine some of the assumptions I've built up over the past two decades. It would, I think, do me good to reconsider how I think about things.

I need to think.
Smartynames uses AI to find you the perfect domain name
It can be fine, but man is Intercom ever an irritating little widget. Always in the way, too small to see context, history of chats is uninformative, emails are messy.
Any suggestions on a better implementation?
1. Get a new job in software dev

2. Get better with everyday Norwegian (that new job should take care of that)

3. Get to A1 level in French (Bonjour, monsieur !)

4. Get through my list of books

5. Start a toy side project only to present something and make small programs for myself along the way
Yeah, German thing. The equivalent English buzzword-abbreviation is "STEM"
doSomethingElse(
doSomething(
object,
a,
b,
c),
a,
b,
c)

Not that bad is it? I think I like it better actually, especially if a b and c had variable names that were longer
Does Windows 10 still uses GDI interface (afaik some fancy bitblit stuff from the olden S3 days) - surely that is deprecated by now and everythingis running on top of the GPU ???.
FBI Calls Apple's Enhanced Encryption 'Deeply Concerning'
They wanted to enable #2 with the local CSAM scan. That way the authorities wouldn't have a reason to ask for cloud data to be decrypted. And Apple could lock it so that they couldn't de-encrypt it even if they wanted to.

Apple actively doesn't want to know your shit or analyse it on their servers. That's why they constantly do things on-device even if it's of worse quality than Google's approach of doing everything in the cloud.
How to accept lead investor commitment on a schedule
Closing a pre-seed round 1.4 m USD for 18 month,

the lead investor wants to invest on a quarterly basis, instead of a full commitment upfront.

How would you structure the shareholder agreement
would I still put the total amount raised and the no shares the investor would receive

+ a schdule for the inbestment to flow in

OR should I not do a shareholder agreement, since the investor wouldn't be receiving the shares upfront ?
> have a network dynamic that can dominate rational factors.

Yes, but only if they are all equally expressive, or if you only care about the lowest common denominator. In a situation with an expressiveness gradient, the distinction will always survive. I think this insight is articulated well in PG's essay on the blub paradox.

Eg: English is a pathetic solution if you want precise/expressive communication for the purpose of engineering -- so no amount of network effect will enable English to trump equations even if it were some new idea (language) like calculus competing with a thousand year old language.

> similarly one would think that if python continues benefiting from lavish attention at some point there will be a python 4 etc. you might argue that this not really "fixing the problem" but in the context of delivering useful products here and now this becomes a bit academic

Probably the most fundamental tenet (self-professed) of Python is its "simplicity". Whatever that might mean, it seems highly incompatible with growing the language in the manner of C++, and even more so if the changes were backwards-incompatible (as the 2->3 transition demonstrated). The dynamics of language evolution might still bias towards that outcome as the needs of large corporate codebases dominate the beginner's need for simplicity, but at that point Python would have lost most of its soul.

But, regardless of all that, (as a concrete example of the kind of limitation I'm talking about) it seems impossible to support generic programming in Python without giving up on OOP / single dispatch. <Lipstick, pig, etc.>

> in the context of delivering useful products here and now this becomes a bit academic

I disagree, vehemently :-) When there is an impedance mismatch between the problem domain and the abstractions fundamentally embedded into a language/system, you are setting yourself up for a world of pain -- needing an exponential amount of engineering effort to overcome the barrier, and the solution will still forever be doomed to mediocre quality (at best).

Calling Python (or pretty much anything) "general purpose" in an absolute sense is a bit of a misnomer -- it just means one is blind to the limitations/biases embedded in the technology, or is implicitly focusing on a limited set of problems.
You can use scripted expressions in drivers, and if the expression is complex it uses the Python interpreter, but drivers are an entirely separate system than GN. They always (afaik) put out a single value, so while you can use them to control a value of a socket or channel inside GN, they wouldn't be evaluated dynamically for every element of a geometry so they wouldn't be a "field".
> Federal wiretap law can compel companies to make it easy for the government to get data via a warrant

Not the same thing. The wiretap law cannot compel any company; only licensed telcos. These companies, in exchange for license to be able to provide such service to general public get some advantages, but have to agree to a set of limitations.

I have my doubts that Apple would be a holder of such license that would make it a subject to such regulations.
BuzzFeed’s Existential Crisis After Its SPAC Merger
I wouldn't object to owning a place for reunion, but that's a lot of money. It does have historical value but even then, I think a more accessible place and better equipped for meetings and creativity would be far better. And although it is historical, it's debatable if that is aligned with EA's mission (if the house were like falling apart maybe that could be justified, but it doesn't seem the case). It really seems like the grant money got to their heads.
I recently discovered a vulnerability and jailbroke RouterOS 7.4 (beta). As far as I know, this is the latest jailbreak for RouterOS (as of today):

https://nns.ee/blog/2022/08/05/routeros-container-rce.html
This would be useful if there was an API to dynamically setup the guest network (for example with a password that changes every week or something). Some routers might have that.

Otherwise, besides the novelty, I don't see a practical case when this solution might be better than a printed QR code?
So finally native docker on macs? Is that an attraction for anyone?
Have more money coming in than going out. Escape from the city back to the country.
Gonna be plenty of tech stuff on this thread, so taking a risk and revealing some more personal goals:

- learn to drive then drive to the sea somewhere with my dog

- renovate flat

- start citizenship process

- become fluent in Czech, instead of my current level of "awkward and nervous"

- be as nice online as I am in real life

- rejoin badminton league and start playing football again
Is the trained model available, e.g. for further use in trasfer learning? I cannot find any link to it.

Edit: I realised that the paper is from 2020, likely there are more advanced models for text summarization. Does anyone have any references to those? Thanks in advance.
I agree overall with many points you make, but I am not convinced about the property’s immunity to depreciation. Certainly the land can be expected to appreciate in value, but what is the annual upkeep on a historic castle? A castle can easily depreciate, depending on circumstances and maintenance.
The UK recently changed from opt-in to opt-out.
I bought one of the Edgerouters thinking it would tie into their Unifi Web controller interface - no hells bells - got a Mikrotik like device where you need Cisco IOS level of skill to configure.

Got a TPLINK Omada ER605 router now - just as powerful but way easier to configure.
Thank you
https://github.com/chryzsh/GPTCommentDetector
A lot of MikroTik devices run OpenWRT just fine. I never really see the point in it - RouterOS is an excellent.. well, router OS.
This is a great article that tries to explain why people everywhere are speaking about Rust. Probably we'll see Rust being used more as an under-the-hood type of language rather than a new de facto standard for data engineering. The article explains this very well.

Mainly it says:

Why Rust: because Rust compiler is strict, easier to use than C/C++ out of JVM

When Rust should be used: when you want speed and performance with data, Rust and Arrow are well integrated and with security about your data types

When Rust should not be used: sometimes Rust type safety is too rigid for data (hf read a CSV), when you want to go fast or on a new project because the learning curve is steep
It's comedy, but honestly, being a stay-at-home mom really isn't the hardest job on the planet. And looking back at most of history, it was probably a luxury.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-gbacsUKpc

P.S.: I am a father that works remote from home. My girlfriend is a stay-at-home mom. Our daughter spends most time at school. Honestly, my girlfriend has a pretty relaxed life. I take care of the money and we got a small house, so cleaning the house really takes little time (I even help in weekends vacuum cleaning and evenings doing dishes). In daytime she has many hours to spend as she sees fit. And in evenings often as well.
Find as many moments where I can reach perfect internal balance and experience the incredible joy of being alive.

It's not going to be easy, my corporate job will demand a lot of me, most of me. But my resolution is to fight to create brief moments of freedom.
If you focus on the essentials, bypass the glitz, and are selective with sourcing, you can run a great wedding for a few thousand. The main costs are land-hire, marquee, catering, and equipment. The rest is free or low-cost. That's what we did, and people still remember it fondly nearly ten years on.
Why walk when you can drive? Why hunt when you can go to the grocery store? Why do structured thinking when AI will do it for you?

You could be in tremendous physical form, have awesome skills with a spear, and be an intellectual powerhouse, but none of that is worth as much going forward as it was in the past.
Just came here to say that I gifted a small amount of money to thank him for this excellent morning read!

Of course the gift is not the money, an almost meaningless amount for me. The gift is the time and attention it took me to actually click that link, sign into paypal and send the money, instead of just clicking away for the next story.

Thank you Julian, you already made my day.
Yep, the author is thinking like a developer, not a consumer.

> If I need assistance, I will most likely do one of the following:

>

> Find a support e-mail.

> Go to a physical store.

> Ask a friend.

> See if I find an unintrusive live chat that I chose to enable.

This is a developer mindset: take the time to solve the puzzle. I get it, but the majority of people don't think that way.

Most people don't want to solve the puzzle. They want to buy the product and get on with their day. Live chat lets them do that, and by the numbers, it works.
Answering my own question, for the sake of posterity:

Just found banana.dev, which allows you to essentially 1-click deploy Whisper.

Then you can use their Python library to connect and run inference.

They use the GPU variant by default (not whisper.cpp), and you are being billed for GPU hours. By default, the model "hibernates" after 10 seconds of inactivity. Which, for me, results in inference times of around 15 seconds (most of which, I presume, is for "waking up" the model).
In network terms the result is packet loss, which is unavoidable. You could shoot through atmosphere with a lower frequency light like infrared but that suffers a reduction of bandwidth and is still subject to packet loss, just less.

I have had to live off a personal satellite in the middle of uncivilized nowhere for a year (literally). Packet loss is the true regulator of speed irrespective of bandwidth numbers.
I did, at some level. Good luck to you!
Can you clarify what you feel I’m lying about?
> I read the book "the rational optimist" where it turns out mining coal and drilling for oil helped save the whales (replacing whale oil) and forests (replacing firewood).

At what cost though ? Sounds overly optimistic to me
>When coffee is all gone.

>It's over.

Mistranslation or not, it has turned out into beautiful short form of poetry.
Or use a urinal (should be available in most public toilets). They have no lid, but often an automatic flushing mechanism, so if you run away fast enough you have a chance to avoid the plume...
I wonder how performance would change if using SQLite instead. You would get those range trees and indexes for free (hence much simpler implementation). Plus persistent storage, some guarantees, etc.
I'm not arguing that Harvard is a hyper-efficient money-making scheme, just that it may be considering total revenue when setting fees.
> but again no one really wants to talk about that

That is the best way to treat Oracle, just pretend it doesn't exist.
They come at a cost, one of the popular ones is 300K+ minified JS and they are common on retail sites with very high mobile traffic -- severely impacting Lighthouse score

Also they often overlay and can block a cookie consent acceptance button etc.

There is no reason for them to fire on every page, isolating them to a support page is surely enough
1. Find a remote infrastructure job in the data science / machine learning space.

2. Move abroad if the said job requires some onsite time, but I'd rather not.

3. Start my own business, my country is kinda late on software stuff and can't afford western product. It's a gap I can fill I think.

4. Grow my online presence
Find more time to be with family and friends.

Spend less time on social media (first year this is a thing for me, but I joined NAFO early on and it was addictive in addition to very meaningful for me).
I just read that story of Mick Gordon, and man, if even half of that is true, Id massively screwed up. Marty and Id owe Mick a ton of money. It's painful to see Mick constantly return to submit to the abuse because he knows they have more expensive lawyers than he does. Marty shouldn't get to work in this industry ever again after such blatant malicious incompetence.

At least that's my reading of it after first hearing about this issue at all. Maybe there's another side to the story.
1. Move to another city and leave my current one

2. Start settling down and find a life partner

3. Work on my side project and figure out if there is a chance

4. Figure out the next part of my life
This comes up every few years. I remember there was even a link about it, but I can't remember what to search for :)

Naive approaches all assume that there is some incremental step, and IETF was just too idealistic to go with a completely new second system. But as others mentioned, it's a coordination problem. Since IPv4 does not have any signaling mechanism for upgrade, or for somehow encapsulating variable/longer length addresses ... adding that is the minimal change size.

Of course if your argument is that the RFCs and the whole v6 world is just a big unfriendly abstract wall of text, not "accidental IT guy" friendly, then of course you are right. But that can be remediated by writing better docs, providing better UX via better tools. (All the usual linux tools are horribly user hostile, and then they have an additional stinking pile of v6 tools, or the occasional -6 parameter.... but that's not exactly the IETF's fault.)
Data stream hack gets UCI world championship qualifier banned
Because then you can justify not using alternate revenue streams like selling their contact details.
Can you provide a better translation for the whole "not eat" example? I'm still not sure what the intended meaning is.
I don’t mean it negatively, consider yourself lucky.
1. start beekeeping in spring
2. creating some web apps in spring boot/angular (i'm a full time on premise dev)
3. having fun with wife and daughter :)
Speaking as one of many who has lost work to the systemd-kills-your-processes issue: No, it's 100% systemd's fault. They shipped a change that broke nohup, screen, tmux, and a dozen other things. All of the feedback they've gotten about the process-killing feature has been negative, but their response has been to shut their ears and blame the problem on distros for not overriding their insane design decision.
Without any specific order:

- lose weight, get fit

- build a successful side business

- maybe find a new (main) job

- spend more time with my cats

- better work-life balance

- treat myself better

- spend more time with my family (father was diagnosed with dementia last week)

- watch more sunsets

edit: lots of good things in this thread, some more ideas/goals for me

- make a barista course/certification (love making coffee)

- contribute to some piece of FOSS

- support university students in my field through a lecture or otherwise
> It also doubles as a way for the US government to surveil anyone seeking to evade surveillance as well.

On a technical level, exit node operators aren't supposed to be able to trace the origin of data flowing through them... so this indicates a failure of protocol.
That would be equivalent to us carrying a lattice pot around and then eating the lattice. Not a real example of photosynthetic animals.
I’m not sure what you mean by qualified.

The research makes you more able to make an accurate decision. It helps improve your outcome.

I don’t think being qualified is important here. I think the important piece is to make a good decision to join a firm, or leave a firm.

There’s no perfect information, but every potential employee has the ability to improve their chances by researching important decisions like this.

I think a good litmus test is if I can’t answer “how do they make money” or “how will they make money” or “how do they create value,” then I don’t want to work for them.
I guess art is subjective, but the Minecraft's End crawl is pretty cringe-y.

I always thought that it was just some thing some programmer threw together at the last minute since it sucked so hard and I've always wondered why Mojang hasn't updated it.

EDIT: oh wow, I actually kept reading and this guy is one greedy mf.

How do you think making a poem is even remotely equal to "making the game". Then all this bitching about how people who actually literally working at Mojang getting money that he - some stranger who again only wrote one poem and nothing else - didn't get. Why didn't he join Mojang as a writer or something if he believed in the project and wanted to work on their games - because he didn't believe or want to work there.

Dude is just angry he didn't get rich on a chance encounter.