skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I am new to Rust. How is the book (or Rust?) agnostic to any particular framework? Do frameworks share lots of commonality, and/or are they just minimal in nature?

Also, even if the book is agnostic to frameworks, will it still help me learn other frameworks like actix?
> Engineers aren't generally setting the priorities on what gets fixed

A good engineer would be like: “f—k it, I fixed it.” And the priorities would then get shifted around it.

Identifying when this is the right time to act and fixing it often makes the engineer gain seniority.

(Yes, it only works when both business and tech are broken. If it’s just the tech broken, then engineer will probably get pipped for working on wrong thing)
Neat! Thanks for the post
Ah, OK. Haven't tried that, mostly camera-off for work.
I guess this is sort of pedantic, sorry, but the EU is about 450M. The EEA adds a few million more. Europe as a whole is larger than the EU.
thanks for saying this. i believe it to be an important comment and it has helped me.
What happens to the matter at the edge of the event horizon when the event horizon grows?

And wouldn’t the density of in-falling matter quickly exceed what is physically possible?
Play safe. You can ignore everything that goes on outside if you go underground but don't breach the caverns. Have a walled off trading area you can let traders and migrants into without them coming all the way into your fort. Grow simple plants and cook / brew them. You'll end up with a ton of food and drink and the time and safety to experiment from.

In DF random things will happen (sieges, monsters, etc) but they don't cheat to get to you, with one glaring exception. If you have a path from your stuff (people or objects) to an enemy the enemy immediately knows it, scouting out the most-hidden paths instantly. To be locked down you need to have a raised drawbridge that actually blocks access.

Turn on seasonal saves and replay when you lose, until you think you've lost in a cool and epic enough way that you'd rather remember it that way than restoring. But play out the fails for a while - often it's easier to recover than you'd think.
"Physicists are creating wormholes and putting them in microchips" has the same energy to it as "AI art is stealing people's intellectual property"
Don't you have to understand a culture before you understand where its laws fit? Doesn't a culture determine its laws?
Yes, that was my case (2). Spatiotemporal marble bounded by big bang and expansion edge. But it's not very satisfying - what is outside? Why?

It does align w/ the "eternal recurrence" concept.
The food scene was a lot more limited than today, even in many relatively cosmopolitan cities.
I predict this will be possible

They already communicate to you when you use a newer iOS feature that won't work on your other device. But you can still use it. Maybe you won't be able to turn back on those features on the older device, or something
> In the end I feel like I have wasted his time, because it was a different problem

Every issue is an investigation. It's normal for the breakage to be in some place non-obvious. Don't beat yourself up over it or let it hold you back from opening issues in the future. If you can provide a good reproduction you'll speed up the time to get to "oh here's the bug" or "not my problem" which is really helpful to maintainers.

> I wish I expressed more gratitude. I'm grateful for everyone in the Ruby and OpenSource community

There's never enough in hind site. Let's all pay it forward a little more
Congrats on the launch… must be a great feeling after working on it for 2 years.

Consider me a noob though, so excuse my ignorant question…

Why Rust for webdev vs other languages, eg python, RoR, clojure, JS or PHP with Laravel?

What are the benefits? What’s the sales pitch ;)

Or is that explained in the book?
But it's all abstractions. The only issue is who gets to decide. The programmer controls the abstractions they're allowed to code, but everything predefined that they are forced to work with are "specs" that someone else abstracted for them. But even the programmers who worked on the specs are dealing with their own set of "specs" forced upon them by someone else. And these form the abstraction layers.

And if you're working on accounting software, then many of the abstractions you're working with are defined by accounting practices and the IRS. Your job becomes to translate them, and the logic, into software that can automate them, etc.

Whenever you're forced to deal with something, it's expensive. Whenever you're forced to do something, it's expensive, especially when considering the cost of getting it wrong.
I've said a bunch of reasonable things about religion, and it didn't get me banned. Occasionally downvoted, never flagged that I recall.

I suspect that the issue may be with your definition of "reasonable".
Or it’s hyperbole and there are many reasons the guy has a 10 year old laptop. People donating a euro for a list of commands is unlikely when 10 euros gives them a billion hours a month on Netflix.

The marginal value of these commands is really, really low when you start comparing it to all the stuff that people could spend.

Most everyone has high rents and old laptops.
I always find that story funny because the structure is so clearly beautiful to my eyes! I was responding to some sibling comments that said that today "most people" don't think it's beautiful.
Pascal does something like that.

But it only goes up to 64-bit, then you get overflow again
>Try to expand the explanation to 3 or 5 paragraph.

In the age of twitter, you expect paragraphs? Your comment is longer than a lot of news coverage, or at least, what passes as news coverage these days. You can try to be the change you want to see in the world, but this is like arguing with a fence post. As the audience becomes predominately younger, the trends of the times will come with them. You can "educate" till you're blue in the face, but being the internet, it's not going to listen.
Hi, hope you're still there.

I don't remember doing anything special. Just copied the files from my older laptop in a writable directory, not under Program Files, but under my user home dir.

Let me know if you have any problem with that.
Presumably the judge had more evidence to consider than just what was in "the book".
Is there any framework that doesn't have security holes?
I agree - and why?

My fun answer for this one is that there is a future civilization facing collapse / extinction / "great filter" and they're (humans or AI) running infinite life simulations to try to determine what actions will give them the greatest probability of escape / survival. We're living in one of those simulated worlds. But that's very human / AI centric, and doesn't answer any of the same questions higher up. Maybe they know.
"Dutch government 3000 farms" is your search term, go find it at your preferred news source.
Why? The mice are the ones running the experiments. You seem to be confused on the subject.
Well on the optimistic side, they might buy your product or company, which they have done numerous times in the past like with Beats, Shazam, Siri, etc..
>Because in theory Apple could go completely against their own philosophy and our decades of prior experience with them, you should instead give all your information to Google so that they can sell it

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Good info; written in 2020
I got that impression because you said "...fake network..."

Exactly. You don't just like them and stuff. That's just the beginning, you have to actually meet them and build a relationship. This isn't always in person, often a zoom call every so often to "talk shop" is how to start. Of course it wouldn't do anything if your just liking their pages and connecting with people. You have to put in the effort to go further, meet with them on zoom or in person, keep that relationship going. Extend those olive branches. It's just that you do it facilitated by linkedin and not at a conference or trade mixer or whatever.

There is no harm in people "harvesting" your stuff. That's what you want, you want to put up there your career accomplishments, the people you know, so that you can be found by the people that need you and your services.
It's trying to run `WHISPER_EXECUTABLE` which it defaults to `whisper` - but if you follow the instructions in the README, you end up with `main`.

WHISPER_EXECUTABLE=main examples/yt-wsp.sh youtube_url

Or the script itself prints out a handy hint.

Whisper needs to be built into the main binary with make, then you can rename it to something like 'whisper' and add it to your PATH for convenience.
Quantum Circuits in the New York Times
I saw the headline, read all the words, saw "Chris Seaton" and thought "oh this is about one of our guys!" before properly processing the final bit. God damn what a fucking shame, I hate this. RIP chrisseaton
Lisp isn’t any harder to learn than JavaScript or Python.
I think a lot of the privacy-conscious Apple users would wholeheartedly support laws that guarantee better privacy than is currently required. That said, we have to act in the world we live in not the world we want it to be.

In any case, I don’t see how using Apple products is at odds with supporting better privacy laws. If anything, they are perfectly aligned since it demonstrates a $2 trillion alternative to surveillance capitalism.
I saw the U.C. Berkeley architecture department ignore and mock Christopher Alexander from their hideous (and richly deserved) concrete monstrosity, so I hope you'll forgive me if an undergraduate architecture degree doesn't impress me, and I am completely indifferent towards the same communities opinion on Wolfe's book.

You need to read my initial comment more closely, I didn't claim modernism sprung fully formed from Gropius' head on September 2nd, 1945: "World Wars 1 & 2 happened, shattering the remaining sense of aesthetic unity we had."

Of course forms of modernism were experimented with pre-WW1, but high modernism and it's attendant ugliness didn't come dominate the built environment until post-WW2. This is of course true, and I think you know this, but you are using snobbish nit-picking (ah yes, architecture) in an attempt to intimidate me because we disagree on aesthetics.
> 10-100000 years

I'm confident it was more than 10 years. :-P
They announced today it will be if you opt in.
If L1 is a problem, then L2 would be a problem as well. After all, at L2 the spacecraft is receiving its commands from the direction of the sun.

However, the problem is not quite as bad as it seems. Spacecraft at L1 and L2 Lagrange points actually are in a halo orbit that "orbits" around the Lagrange point. Attempting to stay at exactly the L1 or L2 point is unstable, since gravitational forces tend to knock you away from that point. The halo orbits are much more stable. And for a spacecraft in a halo orbit, you never have to point your antenna directly at the sun.

The problem is solvable for radio communication at least. There are currently 4 spacecraft orbiting the Earth-Sun L1 point (ACE, DSCOVR, SOHO, and WIND) as well as 3 spacecraft at the L2 point (Gaia, James Webb, and Spektr-RG).
Okay, that's a nice soundbite. Now let's steelman it.

I believe the following to be true:

1. Children are sexually abused. This abuse is far more widespread than we as a society want.

2. Images of this abuse is called CSAM (child sexual abuse material). CSAM is easily distributed over the Internet.

3. People who intentionally download CSAM are criminals who deserve to be punished.

4. Services that scan for CSAM (using hashes provided by the NCMEC, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, and similar bodies) identify these criminals, who are in turn prosecuted by the police. In fact, hundreds of thousands of CSAM are reported by cloud services every year. This, along with the fear of being caught, reduces the demand for CSAM.

5. Some of those caught are found to be creating as well as consuming CSAM. Catching them reduces the creation of CSAM as well as the demand for it.

6. Reducing demand and creation of CSAM protects children.

7. Scanning files for CSAM catches criminals that would not otherwise be caught.

Therefore, "combing through personal data" protects children that would not otherwise be protected.

When you agreed with "children can be protected without companies combing through personal data," did you mean that my sequence of reasoning is wrong? If so, how?

Or were you expressing a personal philosophy that's closer to "I think the benefits to privacy (from not scanning) are more important than the benefits to children (from scanning)?" If so, why do you believe it?
There's no evidence that this is the case, especially with the knowledge that the rate of expansion is increasing over time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerating_expansion_of_the_...
Amazon is really not a great example, I don't think. The giant cloud providers are outliers with respect to DFZ announcements, as they have many, many POPs and also allow their customers to announce address space. They're more like transit networks at this point than what could be reasonably considered a representative end user.

More reasonable to look at announcements per AS, where it's currently about half of IPv4, but trending upwards at a faster pace.

v6: https://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/plota?file=%2fvar%2fdata...
v4: https://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/plota?file=%2fvar%2fdata...
Options:

* you can have more than one device

* you can have a trusted contact to get you the keys

* you can have recovery codes
The series you really want is The Night Manager.

Obviously, this assumes you've seen the BBC Tinker Tailor with Alec Guinness, the canonical Smiley.
It sounds like you'd fall into bucket 2, and would probably pass the rest of the interview on other merits.

This low level programming job, we were implementing filesystems from scratch. Very, very data-structure heavy.
This - I mentioned in another thread when Holmes was sentenced that even if convicted she'll not spend that long in jail (maybe 5 years, most of it on license I would guess?). I suspect Balwani will serve most if not all of the 13 years.

I've no wish to defend either of these people given what they've done, I just think it's worth pointing out that ignoring the disparity doesn't make it go away.
iCloud backups aren’t e2e encrypted?!
Were you in the courtroom for the trials? Did you read all the briefs and transcripts and review all the evidence? They were able to prove 4 counts against her and 12 against him. What is provable and which counts relate to what sentences isn't necessarily intuitive. Why jump to the assumption of sexism without all the relevant info? Even if you had the info, do you have the legal qualifications to evaluate it?

I for one choose to trust my peers who spent weeks hearing all of this and poring over the details. Could it be biased? Sure, that's possible, juries aren't perfect. I just don't understand the rush to assume a sexist bias based solely on the aggregate sentence lengths.
"leave the situation or accept it. All else is madness."
There is also alternative to use some high-level language that implements iterator beyond map/reduce like this: `s.chars().rev().collect::<String>()`
Theranos started in 2003 and had raised $200m+ before sunny joined in 2009. Fraud started before him.
someone is going to havea bad time when they hear about spammers.

or when they hear about the inability of the common people to manage private keys.

either way.
This one? https://github.com/CyberShadow/btdu

Seems to be specific for btrfs
> A Merge Type is a function

Er, okay, if you redefine "type" to mean "function" then sure.
Carlos Ghosn agrees with your sentiment.
You should record a loom and run the ads. Pretty hard to dispute hard video evidence.
Or, I could just build a filtered air inlet for my office that slightly overpressures it. I've considered it, I just haven't done it. I don't see any benefit of going with compressed air tanks here.
This misses the point of the books. The question isn't whether the Soviets are morally equivalent to the west; it's whether foreign intelligence services were anything more than state-sponsored organized crime syndicates.
The things I learned from Common Lisp help me quite a bit in day-to-day JavaScript and Ruby development. The important transferable skills in programming are almost all language-independent, IMO.
This depends on the size of the company. It probably doesn't affect CircleCI but Section 179 deductions are limited to small and midsize companies.
I would not be surprised if there is a backdoor already. Either explicitly ordered or secretly inserted like Dual_EC_DRBG. They’re not burning a zero day vulnerability or certificate authority just to convict one defendant. They’re saving them for something like Stuxnet.
Does it? They seem completely different. AI art theft seems to follow straightforwardly from existing intellectual property law and precedent. There's literal artist signatures being spat out by these generative models. They're obviously learning to mimic copyrighted works.
Even if it's not available (I haven't programmed in Go), I think most of programmers who run parallel code in Go know what is a semaphore or a mutex, don't you think?
And this has been going on for ages and we simply are universe X in time.

Alternative hypothesis the OP seems to refer to is the one of Lee Smolin in which a black hole from a previous universe creates a new universe. Smolin wrote a book about his theory, The Life of the Cosmos. I haven't read it nor do I know / understand his theory fully, so interested to learn others viewpoint on this theory.
Apple's own philosophy? The one they pay to put in advertisements, or the one Edward Snowden leaked to us?
That's not true since the lower income bands have Medicaid which is more generous than Canadian healthcare.
what a terrible waste...
If you use Ctrl+N (or whatever the shortcuts for 'Switch to Desktop N' are set to in the settings) instead of swiping or using Ctrl+Left/Right it's much faster, and input is re-enabled for the desktop you're switching to basically instantly
I think Holmes played a bigger role in the fraud than people give her credit for, whether she "meant to" defraud people or not, I don't think she was like "I'm gonna deceive all these people" but rather "I need to keep the money flowing so that I can develop the technology to make this a reality".

That said, of the two of them, Balwani was the true gangsta. He came in seemingly already knowing how to run a criminal enterprise, and applied those principles to Theranos.
ActiveCampaign raises Postmark's lowest tier pricing 50% starting January 3rd
> Use your own server? Great, it's secure software-wise, but if someone broke into your house, it's all of the sudden the worst liability ever.

this doesn't invalidate the rest of your point, but if your data isn't encrypted at rest on your own hardware, that one very particle point? that's your own fault.
so you make this assumption that these companies laying off mostly fund their business with short-term bank loans? really?
> Sure, you can tell them to go the GrapheneOS route, but I don't think you can trust the average user not to just go and install Google Maps/Google Photos/etc as soon as the alternative FOSS option inconveniences them

Isn't it fine to install Google Maps, etc, in a separate profile, inside GrapheneOS?
> What's the equivalent of the FDA but for consumer privacy?

Corporate altruism, apparently
> your host has a "link-local" address. Could there be a connection here?

Maybe. Or maybe not. It could apply only to hosts connected via the same switch? Or same AP? That's how i read link-local. It's obvious to you because you already know.

> see your complaints about complexity as nothing but the whining of a child

So point me to an overview of ipv6, enough to manually configure a small network, that is clear and complete. Not the RFCs please, I don't want to learn to configure an enterprise (or university) network.

Last time I searched for one there wasn't one.
truly privileged "kids" ain't going around looking for jobs thorough interviews, they show up as "investors" or are otherwise brought in by their 'connections'...
16 billion gigabytes not enough for you?
shocked a brown male got a worse sentence than a white female for the same crime
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33901368
This comment speaks to the soul of my inner gripe. I try to avoid being pedantic, but I can never bring myself to replace this use of ‘all’ with ‘pretty much all’.

It’s just such a clear term. Now that I think of it, it might be one of the least ambiguously defined terms I can think of.
Right, but spinlocks have no concept of fairness at all. With a mutex on thread might experience unfairness for a few ms, a spinlock has no bound.
> Mr. Balwani’s former business partner and ex-girlfriend, Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes, was sentenced last month to 11¼ years for four counts of criminal fraud tied to her now defunct blood-testing startup.

> U.S. District Judge Edward Davila, who oversaw both trials, could choose to give Mr. Balwani more time in prison than Ms. Holmes because he was found guilty on additional counts, lawyers said. Judge Davila could find that investors suffered a larger loss due to Mr. Balwani’s fraud, or that Mr. Balwani recklessly put patients at risk of death or serious bodily injury, both of which could add years to his sentence.

> “VCs invest in very strange ways,” Judge Davila said.

So do courts apparently.
Now do DoorDash
The weird thing to me is that I don't understand how anyone is expected to believe that Bryan Cantrill is somehow less of an obsessive nerd than Dave Miller or anyone else. Like what character was he playing when he wrote that line??
I've seen a lot of excuses from CEO's for why they aren't responsible for their actions but "I didn't have adult supervision" takes the cake.
The core language is unstable

Welp. Im out.
Surprised that he got a longer sentence than Holmes. She really must have made him out like the devil during interrogation and trial. No doubt the nasty old US American racism factored into it, too.
You can get into bucket 2 if you just use hash tables and know the most basic information about their use. Plenty of candidates were in this bucket and passed the rest of the interview.

I still gave the rest of the non-hash table interview to every candidate. What I'm saying what the hash table question was a tremendous predictor of candidate success in every other aspect of the interview. System design, algorithms, problem solving, etc.

Candidates that didn't know anything about a hash table, even just the most basic idea of "fast insert/lookup/delete key-value datastructure", almost universally failed almost every aspect of the rest of the interview.

Candidates that know the basics could go either way.

Candidates that know all the details almost universally crushed every other aspect, including very unrelated things like distributed system design.
More or less, yes. Apple could search for a list of iCloud users with that hash in their account and single them out without breaking the encryption (not that they can't do that too).
I agree that relationships are not transactional. This is my personal viewpoint.

But if I am to observe how others in my community, town, city, and even ethnic background make these decisions, 9 times out of 10 they are transactional. Many of these relationships are loveless and aware of it.

For me to pretend this is not real life would be to bury myself in the bubble of my own experience and assume everyone else loves their partner unconditionally as much as I do, or selected them under similar criteria.

I would go as far as saying what you call “the incel view” is actually how marriage happens in a vast majority of cultures over most of human history. To me that’s not “the incel view”

it’s just life.