skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nope, it was wrongly configured code cache

https://lichess.org/@/thibault/blog/lichess-on-scala3-help-n...

https://old.reddit.com/r/scala/comments/zh3o6x/lichess_runni...
As a football player told me, the helmet is not protection, it is a weapon.
The Internet during world war
Nope, I mean base salary not total comp.
there's a big difference between a permitted contacts api and just giving up your regular gmail password.
Show HN: I fine-tuned Flan-T5. Can it cook?
Checkout the app at https://www.lechef.fyi
Interchain
Move fast and break things (C)
A stopped clock is right twice a day, but it's never useful.
The issue is that we began utilizing a lot of ingredients that just weren't available, or edible at all, until the advent of modern industrial processes.

Eating as much refined flour, sugars and novel vegetable oils turned out to have some pretty negative outcomes, and we wouldn't have made those choices without economic incentives to do so; we developed the technology to make them cheaper, at a scale, and durable to be stored for long periods of time and remain saleable, and much of it is stuff that you wouldn't have eaten as much if not.

It was an uncontrolled experiment.

Now, picking apart peas and rice, isolating their proteins, putting them together with refined coconut oil in a cellulose matrix, none of these things you would even be able to cook yourself, you can't make any assumptions that they'd have an effect in you similar to eating peas, rice or sauteeing something in coconut oil, it's not a valid inference.
You might already know this but niche conferences are part of some larger marketing strategies. Seeing conferences for a product can add legitimacy in the minds of people who are shopping for solutions. But over time I've realized there's more to it, almost an Inception-like quality to a lot of conference topics.

A company I worked for had a whole division dedicated to inventing conferences around products or ideas that other companies wanted to promote. A great example are conferences where there are talks on cloud-based tools. The speakers don't just go up there and say "go buy compute from vendor X". Instead, everything is structured around how to use (often free) tools or techniques that ultimately require investment in "compute or storage from vendor X".

Another, more abstract, example is a conference on programming languages or frameworks. These are great places to push ideas about "the new way" or "the right way" to do something that happen to include something you're selling. I've seen conferences make attendees into low-level developer evangelists. Those people went back to their companies to endorse programming languages and architectures that had a lot of support from particular vendors, and the cycle was complete. It may seem a bit hand-wavy the way I've explained it, but I've seen it work.

My point is, conferences may cost a lot to put on but have quite a few obscured benefits that you have to price in when considering if they're worth it.
My thinking is: there are many ways to make matter do compute. Semiconductor-based digital logic chips are only one of many possibilities.

You can make an analog computer from just about anything, it's a matter of identifying things you can interpret as flows and stores (or, as the professors who taught control systems at my uni, faucets, drains and bathtubs), and arranging them just right. You can make a digital computer from just about anything too - it's a matter of identifying things you can interpret as a NAND gate, and stacking them just right. You can encode a neural network model as grooves in plastic sheets, stack them into layers, and have it naturally process incoming light. Etc. The possibilities are limitless, because computing is more about your mental model, and less about the substrate itself.

So I imagine, the breakthrough for nanotech will be when someone figures out a way to make some kind of programmable computer that works at nanoscale, can be easily produced, and is somewhat robust against the environment. It doesn't need to be a fast computer - we're used to multi-GHz CPUs and multi-MHz microcontrollers, but at nanoscale, even an equivalent of an old 8008 will do, or even something much weaker: single nanobot doesn't need much compute. You'll be deploying them by thousands or millions at a time anyway, and you'll want to program them as a swarm anyway.
> Despite these challenges, the overall impact of technology on society has been overwhelmingly positive. It has empowered individuals, improved efficiency, enhanced communication and connectivity, and driven scientific progress.

Despite working in technology, I'm going to have to disagree pretty hard with any definitive assertion of these claims. At best, I would agree that technology has been largely responsible for a lot of efficiencies that have allowed more people to live for longer. This will remain true so long as we don't have a WWIII where the efficiencies of military technology allow us to kill more humans than we ever could have imagined.

But everything else here seems questionable. How exactly has technology enhanced communication? I can go on Twitter or elsewhere and read a completely moronic sentence or perhaps even view a video of something even more moronic, something so unbelievably stupid I would not have conceived of it if I tried. How has it improved connectivity? My social connections and bonds outside of family and my closest friends have only grown weaker as people replace social interactions with computer and smartphone use. Has scientific progress not also been driven in the direction of abject failure where many 'scientific' experiments have outcomes that cannot be reproduced? We could also claim that trust in science has not been worse in recent memory, and it's not just the fault of those distrustful people.

I don't mean to shit all over your essay. I'm just being a little critical, but I totally appreciate the honesty and effort behind this kind of discussion. The Unabomber's manifesto was fairly impactful, IMO, as an argument against technological progress, and I'd expect a good essay to try to use that (or something similar) as a 'steel man' for the argument against technological progress, and then attempt to prove it wrong.
I run MATE on Debian. MATE has the right trade-offs for me. Not too heavy, not too light. GNOME seems to take more and more resources to do less and less. Icewm requires too much customisation. Icewm is an interesting wm. At first it has an ugly 90's retro aesthetic, but it grows on you after a little while. Switching back to "proper" DEs makes them look a little too sugary.
This is great advice except for the part where I, and approximately 50% of my vegetarian and vegan friends, find the flavor of tempeh disgusting.

Occasionally can be consumed with enough barbecue sauce that I don’t prefer going hungry, but only rarely.

I wonder if it’s a genetic/tastebud thing like goat’s milk; my daughter and I are happy to eat pretty much any cow cheese, but if goat cheese is involved at almost any concentration in a dish, it’s spit-it-out-and-find-something-else time.

Tempeh isn’t quite that bad.
I wrote a lot of 1401 code in the 60's at UCLA including a 1401 assembler (5 x faster than IBM's), a floating point package, and an assembler for the historic SWAC there. It was a lot of fun.
Same! Except my wife quit her money-making job to take care of our kids full-time. I go to work, come home, and spend time with my family. Every Friday my employer deposits about $1,500 in my account, which represents an income stream of about $6,800/mo, not to mention paying for my health insurance and putting about $100 in my 401k. All I have to do is show up for about 40 hours Monday through Friday.

For a side hustle, we bought a home around 2015 for $125k. We've paid off about $70k of the 2.8% 15-year mortgage and property taxes at $1100/mo, it's now estimated to be worth about $330k. That represents an income stream equivalent to about $2200/mo due to that asset's value rising at about 15% per year. If it wasn't for the fact that I live here, I'd be divesting a lot of my investment in that obvious bubble ASAP. Similarly, my parents built my childhood home nearby in '96 for about $80k, their property is now worth about $750k, you do the math.
yeah but the difference is I can immediately ask, hey why isn't this working, or why am I getting this linting error, and it'll maybe point me in the right direction (so far usually it works really well, sometimes I need to refresh the session, and start from scratch with my code base, but it's still instant hand-holding).

I was wanting to try to do something I wasn't familiar w/ at all: Building a mobile app with flutter, and so far I've got the gPT chat completely cloned in flutter, I'm just missing the additional features I wanted to add like saving chats, sharing screenshots and text chats, entering a url, and scraping the page text to ask ChatGPT to summarize, or maybe write a blog post similar to this but don't copy anything, etc....
I do not know how to react about this. On one side I prefer my private information staying private.

On the other I use free services like Google, YouTube, Facebook all the time.

They make money selling our data, on the other, the fact that it is free for everyone is the democratization of the access to information. I suspect that even a subscription of $1 / month will push away more than half of the users for these services.

I prefer to live in the world where people have free access to search engines and large social networks.
My point is very simple. You said "the more API coverage a platform can provide the better". I'm saying that's not true because it can create large long-term costs that outweigh the benefits. I even gave an example. I get why you as an API consumer want maximum surface area. But API producers often feel differently, and they have good reason to. I think the better general strategy for API producers is to open up gradually based on actual need discovered via dialog with community.
I would also add that management often subverts the methodology by using them as a form of metrics. In my experience with Agile/Scrum they started to expect design and implementation in 2 weeks cycles which is unrealistic for large projects. This ultimately ended up in an inability to execute and complete projects that needed long term thinking and planning.
Is $130 plus whatever a state ID costs a reasonable fee to pay (to the government) to access Facebook?
It's not when you're talking about a technological lead. They didn't even make these displays or come up with the technology for them, they just paid for the exclusive right for them for a certain period of time.
This is really important. I think author found results surprising and unintuitive, because they've been looking at the wrong thing.

Rust libraries are designed to be fast when optimized with LLVM. Rust has a lot of layers of abstractions, and they're zero cost only when everything is fully optimized. If you look at unoptimized miri execution, or insert code-level instrumentation that gets in the way of the optimizer, these aren't zero cost any more, and overheads add up where they normally don't exist.
> rather than, say, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, or the UAE

All of these are bitter enemies of the Iranian government.
Good examples, but one of those languages is not like the others, no matter how well it tries to blend in.
Oh, curious, It's the first backup in clojure I've seen :-)

My personal recipe is less sophisticated:

- znapzend on all home machines send to a homeserver regularly (with enough storage), partially replicated between desktops/laptop

- homeserver backup itself via simple incremental zfs send + mbuffer with one snapshot per day (last 2 days), one per week (last 2 w) and one per month (last 1 month) offsite

- manually triggered offline local backup of the homeserver on external USB drives and a physically mirrored home server, normally on weekly basis

Nothing more, nothing less. On any major NixOS release update I rebuild one homeserver and a month or so later the second one. Desktops and homeserver custom iso are built automatically every Sunday and just left there (I know, it simply took to much time checking so...).

Essentially in case of a fault of a machine I still have data, config and ready iso for a quick reinstall. In case of logical faults (like a direct attack who compromise my data AND zfs itself) there is not much protection beside different sync times (I do NOT use all desktops/latptop at once, when they are powered off they remain behind and I have normally plenty of time to see most casual potential attacks.

Long story short for anyone: when you talk about backups talk about how you restore, or your backups will probably be just useless bits a day...
I was referring to comparing the US intel operation to the Stasi.
based on experiences with vending machines, could you imagine the nightmare of cash only pay-at-the-pump? <shudder> we'd have gas lines like the 70s not because of shortages, but just from people trying to pull their bills along the corner of the pump to flatten them out.
Why would they do that? Chrome being hard to compile is a benefit to them. It means it's harder for people to fragment the Chrome ecosystem by making slightly-incompatible forks.
The problem with using GPT for education is it isn't an intelligence, it is just a fancy pattern matcher. It is as likely to give you a wrong or bad answer as a right answer. A student wouldn't be able to tell the difference, so they might learn the wrong stuff. It is handy for people with the experience to tell the difference though.
> In fact, a person’s criminal history has become so trivial that although employers can ask a prospective candidate about it during pre-employment screenings or background checks, many states do not allow that employer to discriminate based on their findings.

Is this really true? As an employer, there are some crimes I'd be happy to give people a second chance on, but others, no way.

For example, I would 100% not hire a rapist or a pedophile. And I would only hire a murderer if there were exceptional mitigating circumstances.

Some crimes tell you a lot about someone's character, even if they have completed their prison sentence.
To start with, learning to communicate clearly at all is very hard to do. Even if you speak in an uncertain, quiet, awkward tone, if you are communicating something interesting in a vivid way, you can sell people on what you're saying.

Look at some old Elon Musk talks -- he's so awkward and nerdy, but nobody cares because he is successfully communicating his ideas.

Clear communication often involves an active voice with a clear verbs. Nominalized nouns are your enemy unless your intention is to be vague. Pretend that the person you're talking to is a computer that is rendering what you describe -- is there enough information to visualize or imagine it? Fluff sentences hurt too. Concrete specifics help.

Eg, "Joe swung the bat and hit the baseball, with a CRACK; and away it flew deep into the field" is better than the more corporate, "a baseball situation was observed after the object was acted upon by an implement, and the synergy involved was said to be breathtaking."

Also: just being super clear on what you are trying to say helps a ton. Being super clear, logically, why your idea is a good one is also necessary. The logic should be correct, and not just sound nice.
Question is not, could see or not. Question is how far will be seen military plane, BEFORE it will fire weapons.

Why? - This is simple, because military need to detect enemy plane significantly earlier, than it will reach fire distance.

For different weapons fire distance differ, but I could write approx magnitudes:

Canon : effective on 300-1000m, could reach about 3000-4000;
Free fall bombs : hundreds meters from point of drop;
glide bomb: kilometers from point of drop (The AGM-154 JSOW has a range of 12 nmi (22 km) for a low altitude launch, or 70 nmi (130 km) for a high altitude launch.);
guided rocket: most known (and used) have ranges, few tens kilometers, but exists relatively small with range 120km, and big with ranges 1000km or more.

And from f-117, main weapon of stealth are rockets, or glide bombs, and detection range for them in best for target case, about few kilometers. So in most cases, if you are target, you will receive present, even don't knowing, who have sent it.
> I would have to lose 30 years of work experience, all of the skills I've learned, and my professional network.

One bad head injury could do all that and more. What are you going to improve then?

My point here is that given other choices, people don't freely choose precarious low wage work. It's safe to assume that people doing those jobs have pressures and constraints on them that limit their choices. This is why they're "willing" to do shitty work. You could be coerced into it too, given the right conditions. Understand the incentives, don't just justify it away as "freely chosen" because it isn't. To some extent that's true of all of us, but not to the same extent and the difference is meaningful.
You believe the US intel operation is comparable to the Stasi?
While we have CMAF and CENC as standards, politics of companies like Apple just decide to change the cipher mode on DRM for HLS Fairplay and suddenly it's a problem for the whole industry.
One of the reasons why I would just open a Jira ticket anyway, process be damned. If I’m suspending work on a P1 because of this ticket, I’m gonna mark this ticket at least a P1. If management wants me to complete it within X hours, then I can find the priority level that matches the X-hour turnaround time.
"Play is the work of the child" - Maria Montessori

Free play is learning for a child. Those are the right things to be doing.
Fireship – Learn to Code Faster
To join the (nit)pickin' party, I would argue that MacVim is WYSIWYG in that what comes out of the printer will look just like what's on my screen, minus the editor chrome that MacVim adds. IOW, if :set guifont=Courier_New:h12, then a bunch of code in 12pt. Courier New comes out of my printer.
Because people that get way into development methodologies spend more time thinking about development methodologies than actual development.
Why is it a choice between allowing leaders to almost never be punished or complete anarchy
We've already replaced 99% of the workforce once. Now instead of subsistence farming, people can live, eat basically any kind of food they want, own a multi-room house, and fly around the world once or twice a year on a vacation, all in exchange for less labor than that same person would have needed to expend to simply not starve a few thousand years ago.

Is that because billionaires "give [you] money out of the goodness of their hearts"? Are you unemployed because all those farming jobs have been eliminated? Obviously not. Rather, the efficiency gains of modern infrastructure have simply made your labor that much more valuable.
>None of the ones that support macOS are good, and all of them that don’t have explicit macOS support are all awful.

VimR is very good; I've been using it before it started using Neovim as the core [1].

[1]: https://github.com/qvacua/vimr
Sign into nopecha.com with your Github login and let us know how it goes. I don't think the OP is BS'ing us but I'm happy to let you conduct your investigation.
Hes asking for "consistent results", not perfect results.
Straight Dope is a general forum about everything. For the latest threads see:

https://boards.straightdope.com/latest
Valgrind (and “friends”) are exactly this, they can measure cache misses, branch mispredictions, etc.
Maybe it's a spectrum: Montessori, Monte-sort-of, Monte-scammi (for stuff that has no relationship to Montessori besides being made out of wood.)
They frequently stop cars that are entering at the "border", especially if the plates aren't from Monaco. If the Ferrari had the 4-character plates it likely would have been let through without a second look.

Quite a few reasons they do this, but the police prefers cyclists so worked out for you.
The repository is back. The offending patches (for the apps AnyTracker and Pflotsh ECMWF) have been removed.
HN is sometimes guilty of something like this when commenting on themes other than computer and engineering stuff, so I believe this is a much more common failure of reasoning rather than a Gladwell or a journalism thing.
(And uhh Pinker may be guilty too)
My real thoughts are, I want to suggest a different heading, not sure where you're headed, but something less vague like:
- "Is Session Chat at risk?"
- "Are we at risk for using Session Chat?"
- "Session Chat servers are up in Ukraine?"

I dunno, I'm terrible at this
And we also have a "Smart cell" for plotting charts too, which can help you get started!
Never? Probably depends on where you are in the country, but they're quite bountiful in the west. Even seen kits with their parents.
TJ DeVries (one of the Neovim contributors, and a frequent streamer) was working on some sort of vim9 translation support for Neovim. Seems more like a side project rather than something that will be built into Neovim, though.

https://github.com/tjdevries/vim9jit
Sure, people can do that. And people diving into janky private APIs know that they're taking a gamble, and that things may break at any time. That doesn't in any way oblige GitHub to support them.
How does Firefox politicizing their project affect you? It shouldn't. If you don't like the quality of the browser, just say that, otherwise YOU are the one being political.
The only thing that works is:

- people who care

- people who make a good faith effort every day

- people who consider the big picture and don't relegate themselves into a comfortable little box
I think the point here is that this post was optimized to try to go viral. Most startups won’t have 4% as a minimum revenue cost.

For example, you chose the most expensive Billing plan (Scale), which includes things startups don’t need. Similarly assuming the most pessimistic payment mix where everyone is using international cards along with currency conversion, which will never be true. Similarly adding data pipeline.

It’s not “Stripe’s real pricing”, as you’re no doubt aware. That’s where it turns from informative to marketing.

If there’s a way that Lago, or any other Stripe competitor for any product, cuts down on fees, that’s fantastic. There are definitely ways to beat Stripe’s fees on payments, for example, though they’re as difficult as the are transformative.
Sure there is, not like there isn't misconduct and thus negative associations with the latter too though. But regardless if you label the group that thinks so "a chunk of people" or "some noisy idiots", them turning up is still different from them conspiring to dog-pile you, which RPi are now claiming. And belittling them instead of ignoring them breaks your "we're a nice and open community brand" image you've been trying to sell even for many of those that are not in the group, and as I said I think it's primarily the consequence of that what they are seeing now. One would think that's Social Media management 101 by now... (So if you blew that up over just a "some noisy idiots" you've mishandled it even worse?)
Can't wait to be disappointed by the first fully AI-made movie.
Your comment is nonsensical. Montessori isn't partisan anymore than algebra is.
Many things are untrue. Including "if someone else can be blamed, I am blameless".

But that's getting a bit off track. I responded to the attitude where someone should not be expected to read a simple and clear dialog because they were a hairless ape that could be drunk.