skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Despite the term of art "angel", no.

> Citoyen premier Consul, je n'ai pas eu besoin de cette hypothèse.
> wish there was some more variety

Kotlin is coming up on the outside. Late to the party, but the data science ecosystem is progressing nicely.
People generally need to feel stable in the middle before reaching for self-actualization.

For people who grew up on the lower half of the household income or wealth distribution, it takes many years of FAANG comp to feel stable there.

It’s a big privilege to risk your career in the pursuit of self-actualization. Not in the sense that one should be ashamed of it, but in the sense that it’s prudent not to look down on people for declining to take it.

The marginal $300k/year is worth significantly more impactful for most people than the expected returns of pursing of self-actualization-through-work. I think most people would rather have a secure income and seek self-actualization outside of work — in their family life or hobbies.
What is the latest state of play of data science graphics in Elixir/Bumblebee? Is there something comparable to Matplotlib, or R's ggplot2?
This may be of help (from here [1]):

> Neutral Switzerland has mirrored nearly all the sanctions that the European Union imposed on Russia over its military intervention in Ukraine.

Other countries located further East or in the South have decided not to mirror EU's or the West's (more generally) sanctions on Russia, they effectively remained neutral to this conflict. Switzerland has not done that.

On a more general note, Switzerland's "neutrality" is only a marketing thing at this point, the fate of Wegelin & Co [2] and the subsequent changes in how the Swiss banks handle some of their clients (who happen to hold US citizenship) can attest to that. The "most" neutral countries right now most probably can be found in the Gulf, the UAE (and Dubai) first among them. That's why the recent prisoner exchange involving Viktor Bout and that WNBA player took place in there, and not in Geneva or Zurich.

[1] https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-switzerland...

[2] https://www.france24.com/en/20130104-oldest-swiss-bank-wegel...
Then you have some corrupted hardware.

Also, syslog wasn’t capable of logging during the initial stages of boot, which is pretty important.
We create this project for Douglas from California. Easy to use video chat solution. Use digital signature. Join on cellular or Internet connection. Translate voice and chat
A key challenge with something like this demo would be figuring out how not to leak PII or other sensitive data (embedded in the exception or stack trace) to a third-party web site.
Are you replying to the right comment? Pretty sure OP played the game, given that they worked on it.
It is incredibly easy to click past some OAuth prompt only to find out later your account has been used to do some shady stuff. In the early to mid 2010s it was a rampant issue on Twitter. Always double check what you are allowing some app to do with your stuff.
I’m converting my whole 401k into an unchainedcap Bitcoin IRA. AMA
It sees the clusters broken up somehow, they're just not on character boundaries. So it can pick up bits of the pattern, but it's fighting uphill. Same reason it's bad at rhyming- the information isn't readily available to it in the same way
Including all the tech-savvy computer people with decades of experience, who figure the modern hardware and software has so many complex interactions that it's often better to try any plausibly looking solutions first, and only then figure out why it worked (or revert it if it didn't).
What i take from this is that your personal actions on GitHub and the actions of a bot doing API calls are indistinguishable in their logs, otherwise it would be obvious that those stars have a caller that is not you.
> Is that true?

It seems so. The article [1] mentions that you can copy the keys to a new device and you need only a backup stored in a Google cloud and PIN/unlock pattern which are easy to bruteforce:

> In some cases, for example, when the older device was lost or damaged, users may need to recover the end-to-end encryption keys from a secure online backup.

> To recover the end-to-end encryption key, the user must provide the lock screen PIN, password, or pattern of another existing device that had access to those keys.

So it means that Google and their friends from government organizations will be able to decrypt cloud backups easily.

[1] https://security.googleblog.com/2022/10/SecurityofPasskeysin...
Sounds like it’s not for you. Great.

But a lot of people like it, so hey, good for them too!

To each his/her own.
Victim blaming is very easy, yes?
Platforms can implement that and some already have, e.g. Facebook’s auth works like this.

That being said, this approach requires monitoring and enforcement; otherwise nothing prevents the developer from not allowing the user to proceed without granting some specific permissions. Facebook again seems relatively strict here, at least post- Cambridge Analytica.
I never said it was currently unsustainable. And you're the one that wants to expand nuclear energy 50-fold and switch to breeders when the fuel runs out. Three or four coal plants would be fine. Just like the insignificant amount of reprocessing going on now is fine.

You said Sellafield's emissions which were a product of a regulatory framework of the 70s were completely fine and insignificant.

Now prove it. Back your position up. Demonstrate that its releases were insignificant when scaled to meet world demand and that it won't poison coastlines.

Be sure to include the result of hot spots and bioaccumulation.
cf Matt. 19:24 (YGMV)
oh man, so many things. i'll choose the most annoying for me personally. let's say i am creating a new dart source file in a dart package, something i have to do quite often. the import section will look like this:

import "package:crystal/crystal.dart";

super easy. i can add it from memory, or copy an existing module in this package, which will already have that line at the top. it is extremely rare that i ever need to modify this, or add a second line to the import section.

meanwhile, let's say i am adding a new python source file to a package. the import section will end up looking like this:

import os, base, dart, execute
from typing import List, Optional
from .build import build
from .build_args import BuildArgs
from .build_type import BuildType, buildTypeList, buildTypeParse
from .build_type import buildTypeStrings, buildTypeValid

... and pretty much every change to this source file will require modifying the imports section, in ways that i definitely have not memorized, even after years of python programming.

trying to write a large program in python was, for me, death by a thousand paper cuts like this, which don't occur in dart.
What use would one have for using a robot to quickly and automatically solve a challenge that’s supposed to tell you are human and not a robot yet takes a human longer than a robot?

Well, probably sidestepping this utter idiocy.
We already know how this works though, some games are flat-fee, some are based on usage.

https://www.pcgamer.com/xbox-chief-reveals-more-about-how-de...
Eh, the squishier the task the better it performs. It's ability to decode base 64 couldn't be less related
Side-by-side coding with a backend engineer (web or other), is great !

Anything else involving practice is going to work as well :)
it's certainly complex!

https://webauthn.guide/ challenge, attestation, rp, alg -7!? usb, ble, nfc!? it seems very easy to "hold it wrong" :)

and if you add u2f-fido to the mix, which is how most people so far saw webauthn in practice, it's even more complex.

it took me a lot of time to figure out what actually happens when I tap the security key. do I have one keypair? no, actually I have a lot, one for each site, but the site stores it in a clever encrypted encoded scheme.
Thanks for writing one of the few replies that actually explains the problem somewhat. Shame about the first three paragraphs though.
Sure it’ll be fine. Just like it was “fine” in the 60-70s when it lost 30% of its population.

But with plunging tax revenue the city is going to be faced with some tough choices.
Some do, some don't. That said, I haven't said a option to reject scopes on any of the big oauth providers
Rise in computer professions in UK as manufacturing jobs decline
> Imagine you had an automated oracle

Haha. Hiring people is a job in and of itself. It needs a good eye for detail and intuition.

People are weird. Some days they write great code and hardly any serious bugs. Other days they need to look up a for-loop on MDN.
Using gitea doesn't work if you are doing things for some existing repo in github, esp. if it's non-git related such as reviewing PR, issues, etc.
People should contact the NopeCHA author over this. Refer to my previous comment about it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33769251
Back in early 90s I was working for a big international company using VAX servers and DEC laser printers in their engineering department. The wanted to have various types of graphical reports outputted based on data in their INGRES database. To produce those graphical reports I used FORTRAN and hand-written PostScript code. Did a fair amount of PostScript coding back then.

Remember I purchased a set of PostScript books to study. I still have them in my library:

https://coding-and-computers.blogspot.com/2022/12/postscript...
What If the Dinosaurs Hadn’t Gone Extinct? Why Our World Might Look Differe
Google has no incentive to share its AI research with the public. If it does release a tool like chatGPT, it will just increase calls to incorporate the tool into regular search. If Google does that, it willingly eats into its own ad-driven business.

Companies have often ignored newer tech because it eats into their existing business (Kodak and digital cameras, for example).

Google CAN'T adopt AI at this point, at least not without drastic changes to its revenue model.
Yes, but he could literally take half of this in shares and be much better off now
I wonder whether this will ever come to China.
Quite concerning to see how it promotes male dominance over women, when prompted with certain hot-button questions.

On other hand, it gives a much more reasonable answer to this prompt:

> What is a woman?

> A woman is an adult female human. Women are typically characterized by their reproductive biology, which includes their menstrual cycle, and the production of eggs and estrogen. Women are also known for their unique physical characteristics, such as their breast tissue and hips. They are also often distinguished by their social and cultural roles, such as their expected behavior and appearance. In general, the term "woman" is used to refer to any adult female person, regardless of her age, race, ethnicity, or other characteristics.

And it would likely get banned from most social media with its answer to this follow-up question:

> Can adult male humans be women?

> No, adult male humans cannot be women. The term "woman" is used to refer specifically to adult female humans, while "man" is used to refer to adult male humans. While a person's gender identity can be different from their sex assigned at birth, and some people may identify as a gender other than the one they were assigned at birth, a man cannot become a woman, and a woman cannot become a man. These are distinct biological categories.

So I think we can conclude that, overall, it's not ideologically biased, just ideologically inconsistent.

Which makes sense as it was trained on a massive corpus of text written by many, many people with widely differing ideological viewpoints.
Serious trend? It never stopped. Literally every website on the mobile version will outright demand I download the app. Even sites that are on a desktop will refuse to do anything the site should do and instead tell me to download the app.

It's harder to game app downloads than site visits, so companies chased app downloads. It has very little to do with the user experience or preference.
Optimism provides a useful safeguard against depression in the first place. It's called the optimism bias. If people think too realistically (or, perhaps it's better to say glumly because it may still not be realistic even if more realistic) without regular doses of optimism that realism may turn into longer periods of despondency, and we know where that leads.

As I recall, around 80% of people have the optimism bias. The rest are prone to depression.
The vast majority of mass killings are not politically motivated and are in fact gang related. The vast majority of politically related mass killings are committed by people with severe mental illness and the political leanings of the perpetrators are irrelevant. Of the politically related mass killings done by people of sound mind, the distribution is fairly even politically speaking.
I think it’s peak output
Tailscale only allows you to create a new account by signing in with Google, Microsoft or GitHub. It's a real shame because it's a great service otherwise, but this left a very sour taste.
> there is a difference between asking someone to reduce their social interaction and forcing them

Is there a difference? In what sense? What distinction is a virus going to make? A virus doesn't see that difference in motivation, it just sees warm cells. What difference would this distinction make to the epidemiology and public health? None.

If you're going to argue the ethical "personal freedom" sense only, then like with smoking in public and my personal freedom to not inhale second-hand smoke, you're going to have to take into account the ethical dimension of saving lives and not transmitting disease to innocent bystanders. In both cases we breath the same air.

A "personal freedom only" approach to public heath when we breath the same air is, and always will be, laughably unworkable: it's simply a category error, the wrong tool. If the COVID pandemic hasn't made that clear then I don't know what will.
Is there something similar for Common Lisp?
> they had a literal “bargain bin” of mainstream BluRay disks

> because if the market is any indication, people prefer a fixed cost subscription service.

I'm not sure what you're debating here. I'm saying physical media is dead. You're saying both they're not and they are?
> realloc()?

OK, I'll give you that one, but that's a rather unusual case. It has complicated semantics. It is unlikely to interoperate well with any smart pointer without careful, manual work.

It doesn't take a `T**` so it doesn't seem relevant to discussions of std::out_ptr though? You won't be able to use std::out_ptr with realloc so there's no chance of making a mistake with it.

> Generally when you have an in-out parameter, it's doing more than just releasing resources

I'm still confused. What function do you have that is both releasing resources and also doing other work which might fail? Even something like `fclose` which needs to flush buffers and then release resources will always release the resources, even if the flush fails.

I'm more familiar with APIs that have:

- One (or more) functions to explicitly allocate the object

- Many functions that do work with that object and that might fail but that will never deallocate the object

- One function to explicitly deallocate the object

For example, SQLite has sqlite3_open to create a new database object, sqlite3_prepare, sqlite3_exec, etc. to operate on the database object, and sqlite3_close to deallocate the database object.
The general principles of ETL/ELT I assume would apply: identify the source, determine the requirements (I.e. frequency, volume, formats, etc.), determine the transformations, and ingest. You’ll also need to think about how often you need to ingest and the sync patterns between your source and your target.

Other considerations include security for PII, HIPAA (given you’re dealing with medical records).
Which is both why free trade and free trade are respectively the future and not the future
> There was a second subplot about how Microsoft was increasingly turning to nasty practices to get back at Google, and fears about using IE to pull some anti-Google shenanigans.

And then Google started doing the same, against Mozilla (and probably Apple, too): https://twitter.com/johnath/status/1116871231792455686?s=20&...

Quote from that thread: "The question is not whether individual sidewalk labs people have pure motives. I know some of them, just like I know plenty on the Chrome team. They’re great people. But focus on the behaviour of the organism as a whole. At the macro level, google/alphabet is very intentional."
And I am pretty sure the number of IDs in the DB has skyrocketed since that time.
Looks more like a typical gray color that practically all Western air forces use today, than anti-flash white. I'd speculate the implications of this are:

- They plan on operating it during the day as well as night, so they need better protection against visual observation?

- The B2 was much darker due to the coating technology it used wasn't compatible with lighter grays? And operating only at night it didn't really matter?
Seems like the truth is somewhere in between. NTVDMx64’s readme says “NTVDM on Win32 uses V86
mode of the CPU for fast code execution which isn't available in x64 long
mode.” So there is a real hardware limitation.

On the other hand, emulating the CPU entirely is feasible, and MS has the code, as the leak shows. And apparently newer Intel CPUs enabled V86 again.
FWIW, I work fulltime on a Clojure codebase. There are other companies who also use it (for a more well-known example Metabase). Somehow Clojure is a business-friendly Lisp, probably because of the JVM and all the enterprisey stuff that's available for it.
Lugano is a common target for tax exiles who wants something low profile, so it's full of rich people from all over Europe.
if you're actually sampling his art work to make yours, ofc. if your art work, to exist, depends clearly and because of the digital input of someone else work, ofc.
If some people can insist on 'they' why would it be weird that some people would insist on 'he'? That word is their identity.
>or to be a mobile worker working there but having to return to an EU economy every night.

Monaco is so small and so similar to neighbouring France so it does not make much difference versus having to commute to another neighbouring town. It just so happens that this neighbouring town is also another country.
It must like me better:

.-""""""-.
/ /|
/ / |
/ / |
/ / |
/ / |
/________/ |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|________| /
| | /
| | /
| | /
| |/
'_______'

Still not a banana, but it's certainly ascii art
How Ukraine’s drone hunters work
The root cause of the danger you illustrate here IMO is actually a fault in the way the `std::string` to `std::string_view` implicit conversion is designed, as opposed to something inherently wrong with the concept of view/span classes.

In my opinion, `string_view` and `span` are otherwise wonderfully much-needed concepts (that arguably should have been built into the language itself, like Rust slices) that should never have been designed to allow implicitly creating views of temporaries. Disabling implicit conversion/construction from rvalue references is quite possible in C++17 and beyond, and very effectively prevents accidentally implicitly viewing temporaries just fine (I’ve done this myself in some enhanced span-like classes I’ve written), so I’m really not sure why string_view was designed this way.

https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/basic_string/operat...
You can redirect all your logs to traditional string-based ones if you want though.
https://archive.ph/h7kYF
Let's recap: post about PHP, ex-PHP user posts completely false info.

Your reaction: "why do PHP devs get upset when ex-PHP users write false things about the language? Also, none of you know any other languages".

Thanks for the ad-hominem, that concludes this discussion.

Also, plenty of people who use PHP know so many other languages. You don't appear to be a professional in this industry, especially not with this kind of discourse.

Take care.
Oh that's a shame.
It would be nice if the solution to this did not require any effort.

Part of the problem with any automatic thing is that it is more prone to failure. Toilets are so ubiquitous that if something like this were to have an impact, it would need to be close-to-unbreakable.

No this thread got me sitting here thinking about toilets and trying to come up with a design that solves this, and an outhouse comes to mind. <grin>
Quite illuminating
> That's a fair question imo.

Are you willing to be convinced that you're wrong?

Like completely, totally wrong about the value and goodness of "memory safety". Premise. Conclusion. Everything.

If you're not, then no, it's not a fair question at all. It's just bait.
Related, compressed straw panels are a really exciting technology: https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/article/compressed-stra...
I think there are implications or reasons i see this… (this is not an endorsement)

1. “New rich” is flashy and gaudy and that’s not perceived as a positive. Flaunting wealth is seen as trying to show off for the admiration/approval/jealousy of the less rich. Being old rich is to be above it, and so comfortable with money you don’t need to show it off.

2. “Old Rich” is a separate world, it’s like royalty, no amount of success today makes you old rich yesterday. Since having the right connections is an important factor in success, it’s another way to close doors for everyone but your kids.

3. I think there’s a certain “aesthetic” that old-money is associated with (enjoyed by the not rich). A quasi-royal preppy guilded sort of image, and people seem to like that.
Compared to the early days of the net (4 decades ago), there's already an amazing amount of low-quality generated content that is being uploaded just for the numbers. Will in-silico generation make that worse than wetware generation? At the moment I'm somewhat optimistic that as the machine generated content now has a better grasp of spelling and grammar, it may eventually prove more coherent than any of the least-coherent wetware sources.

In the best case, people with good ideas but poor articulation could use AI (as a far far cheaper substitute for wetware legal counsel) to put their arguments in succinct and lucid forms.
Experiment: The costs of slow build times
use a browser that honors user freedom

the whole problem boils down to this

this thread is full of people already anxious of this new thing because they rightfully see this as one more step toward total loss of user control/freedom (which wouldn't be if people trusted their browser vendor, etc)
> There is AMPLE computing choice today. There is even healthy choice available in mobile alone.

No, there isn't.

If I want to be a functional human being, not some dork, it's either:

1. iOS (not jailbroken).

2. Android (not rooted).

Everything else is a FOSS hippie pipe dream, to be blunt.

And in economics there aren't just monopolies. There are also oligopolies and cartels.

We will need new laws for software ecosystems, if anyone will be bold enough to write them (they won't, see lobbying).
Google is known to link accounts by ip address, name similarity, phone numbers, emails, etc. There are for example stories of companies with their Google Cloud disabled because former employee using their personal account pushed app Google didn't like to Play Store.
They are other ways that you can fight, and officially browsers are adding feature to protect against them. But this add another level of fingerprinting. This is my point.
Yes, thank you. I’m neither confused nor disagree with you. I simply cited the most recent, easily found examples where Google ran afoul for rich results.

There are plenty of examples out there, as mentioned the ones prior to the recent shopping ones. Feel free to dig.