skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sort of, yes and no.

Divers dive with no pressure protection far, far deeper, certainly as deep as 100m and beyond. If the station floods but they have air to breathe, then that's fine.

However, they are doing saturation diving. This means their bodies are full of dissolved nitrogen, which, if they were to ascend to the surface over any shortish frame of time, would regassify and kill them - that's "the bends". When ascending grona saturation dive, it takes hours to days, depending on depth, to surface.

So if the station floods and they each have a scuba kit, they still can't surface and are potentially in trouble.
I know, I’m just saying that HEIF is the next-gen incumbent to beat. A lot of comparisons are being done with WebP and AVIF and legacy JPEG, which aren’t the real competition.
Ask HN: How to fight facial recognition adoption by Government agencies?
Would getting a law-enforcement officers database publicly available help in fighting facial recognition?
> I don't get any money until you hand me the cash.

Just do a bank transfer to the individual you're buying the car off. Unless you live in a country with incredibly poor payments infrastructure, the funds will be available instantly.
It "makes sense" to the same degree a 30 year non-callable bond makes sense--which is a long time but, in the US, 30-year fixed mortgages are obviously quite common.
This change would affect Monero too. If you buy Monero through any sort of company that is following the law, they will have to enforce this on their customers.
or to protect the children
That should be encouraging, not disheartening. The best methods for keeping healthy just involve easy simple things anyone could do for free everyday. That’s better than any dependence on shitty expensive drugs.
1. It's spelled "Serf"

2. Serfs were indefinitely tied to the land. Heritable Fiefs were also indefinite.

In general you are exactly backwards, indefinitely arrangements are a holdover from Feudalism. Getting away from them is getting further from Feudalism.
In my next backend, I want to use serverless functions (Cloudflare), serverless Postgres (Neon), and nothing more.
30 years ago Haskell was the winner. Conciseness was a major feature.

Has anyone put this to the test on larger projects?

10,000 lines of Haskell have the same functionality as 100,000 lines of C++?
Are you talking about the manufacture or operation?
Yes I had.

I don't think you are very good at debating.
I like this one: https://www.aircompany.com/products/air-vodka/
Forking is one of those things that is a super elegant solution when things are simple, but breaks down when things become complicated.

Multithreaded app? Fork is now a liability, and is only useful if the only (more or less) thing you do in the child is exec. Might as well only have Windows-style CreateProcess at that point.

For single-threaded programs, sure, fork is fine and gives you more flexibility than a CreateProcess-type API.

Asynchronous signals have a lot of the same problems, but those problems are also present in single-threaded programs. Quite a few APIs have been added over time to try to make working with async signals easier and safer, but all of them add their own new gotchas.
Can you expand on your steps a bit more? I've never used Github Actions which seems like step 1. Not sure how to get an installer.
It is still a waste of administrative labor.
I think the intention was to spark conversation loosely around SPAs vs SSR. It seems we're at yet another turning point and frankly, I'm enjoying the debate.
Yup. Pride. Mine doesn’t stink.
A video “embedded” in YouTube subtitles (only works on PC)
You don’t need a gym, those are just excuses. You can do a lot right at home, and more frequently as you don’t need to go all the way to the gym every time.
> Can someone explain to me how this 10K EUR limit can be enforced?

Same way the law about having the correct plate on your car is. Nobody's stopping you, but if you're caught, you go to jail and/or get a fine.
There is not an issue with the safety of banks. There was an issue with the amount of physical cash in the right place - during the pandemic (like any panic, recession etc) lots of people rush to cash and there isn’t enough of it. May mean the same thing when you can’t get the cash but it’s an important distinction. Ultimately very few people use cash so why have massive stocks everywhere, use it or lose it people…
This videos shows the perverse mindset of climate activists that you "have to change your lifestyle" and personally suffer to solve the problem. It's a common refrain and erroneous, but here particularly so as only carbon capture, mechanical or natural, can fully solve the problem -- that is, there's already too much greenhouse effect and even an extreme agrarian lifestyle won't solve the problem.

Climate change is a problem nobody can personally solve and I think this personal suffering makes them feel like they're doing something.
Seems like a good strategy.
That looks great. Looks it might be viable for me. Security risk in my setup is is cloud storage. And also I'm relying on a password safe Dropbox sync app.
Lucas is a flawed genius. It's a bit shocking how few films he has directed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Lucas_filmography

compared to say

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Spielberg_filmography

It's pretty clear that he hasn't been trusted to get near directing a feature film.

When I look at Lucas's accomplishments I think the most remarkable thing he did was what he did at

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucasfilm_Games

where he really pioneered getting storytelling into videogames. He could have gone down the path of licensing chintzy games based on Star Wars but instead we got stuff like

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars:_The_Empire_Strikes_...

and

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_(1983_video_game)

which were ahead of the time. He saw that video games weren't up to the standard of the cinema and was an early pioneer in raising that standard.
Not many people can fully drive a car then. Which makes sense.

I think excluding off road / hazardous mountain roads etc. might be OK for the definition. And still cover many 9s of actual trips.

Driving into a parked ambulance is definitely a no no though.
We data scientists are well-known for our exclusive mastery data wrangling arcana, like…

df = pandas.read_parquet(‘foo.parquet’)
df.to_csv(‘foo.csv’)
df.to_json(‘foo.json’)

(no sarcasm)—how could it be simpler than that? What problems have you encountered that make it unusable?
Ideally, you could afford to never have to convert your Moneros to cash.
What do you have against text? I can't cope with GUIs hiding everything while wasting half the screen on decorations. Text is simple, doesn't change, is easy to remember. I started with GUIs too, used Windows, Mac OS 9 and OS X before discovering the CLI, so this isn't nostalgia, I really prefer text. It's incredibly empowering to interact with the computer through a simple and comprehensible text interface.
Check out angr [1], a symbolic execution engine, and claripy [2], its frontend to SMT solvers like z3. Depending on your background, I probably wouldn't describe angr as "for newbies," but claripy is a very clean SMT interface!

[1] https://angr.io

[2] https://api.angr.io/claripy.html
More like a hotwire but instead of being extracted from Basecamp's work it feels like it could have been extracted from Makandra's work maintaining many different Rails apps.

I think it's very good and for me, the best of the bunch. I'm moving a very large app to it (from old school RJS) and it seems to have thought of everything that I need.
And also in 2016:
"Lepton image compression: saving 22% losslessly from images"

https://dropbox.tech/infrastructure/lepton-image-compression...

It's now deprecated though and quite comically tragically they are suggesting to switch to a different format and mention JPEG XL as an alternative.
> To monitor for... corruption?

Yes, because people taking a bribe would definitely care that it’s illegal to have a cash transaction over €10k
It takes effectively zero effort to maintain my redis instance in AWS, so I’m not sure you’ve got a real argument here…
If society thinks there are too many sports cars or yachts, then it can increase marginal wealth/income/property/sales taxes. And if society thinks there is insufficient food or infrastructure, then it can pay people to make food and build infrastructure. Either way, if both are competing for the same supply of labor, only the highest bidder will get it.
Yes. Good old "look where the trend is going, foresee the risks".

Ah, remembering the surprise of upset people when they did not raise a suspect in front of bank clerks telling you "It's contactless, limited risk, 25u per transaction" (and already then the child-basic retort is "Times by how many transactions?"), and then were reached by the bank information that "owing to progress the limit is now raised to 50u / 100u / 150u ..."
> But please don't wave away the entire discussion with strawman arguments.

What strawman argument? I was responding specifically to the point I quoted that feeding more people is important. And I made a couple of points specifically against that position. So where's the straw?
Not if I don't use a Google email address. :)
Well, we do, if you don't like that fact complain to your government.

"Oh look at those EUROPERANS with their fancy PRIVACY, real men get fucked unlubed by corporations and LIKE IT" doesn't help anyone here, the fight here is to make government do well by average citizen, not throwing insults at people that happen to be fucked differently by their government
And there's also some kind of a real psychological incentive for some, like myself, to be basically unable to do "absolute minimum" when I come to do the job and engage myself, because that would drive me crazy.
The big corporate gyms are dirt cheap and typically have onsite daycare for a small fee. My wife and I pay $55 a month for a family membership at LA fitness, and daycare is $5 per visit or $15 extra per month. No indoor track, though.
This website does not have any information about owners or legal entity behind it. Who is running this? What is their physical address? Where are they registered?

Meaning they are managing invoices: the above informantion is very important.

This seems more like Google ban them than they did something about “privacy”.
Google's frontend engineering tends to be pretty poor and out of step with wider industry practice in my experience. They have created not one, but 3 of their own frameworks (Angular, Angular 2 and Polymer), two of which (Angular and Polymer) were rather poorly performing, and the third of which is kinda ok but doesn't seem to be that widely used internally. They tried to create their own frontend language (Dart), which nobody uses.

Meanwhile most of the industry is using React, which is actually pretty well engineered and perfectly fast (you may well find yourself using a slow React app, but that's not React's fault).

P.S. Talking layer of DOM nodes, I actually did a few samples of this the other day. Gmail has 34, which was by far the deepest of any website I checked and probably isn't helping it's performance.
seems like they backtracked on the issue just a hour ago;

https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/40...
Ask HN: How do you prepare for a new year?
Curious if any of you have a good system or process you use to reflect, set goals, just figure out what you are going to focus on for the year ahead etc since we are coming up to that time in the year and i'm starting to think about that myself.
evolved preference v.s. targeted marketing v.s. agribusiness subsidies

... just kidding they all work together
> The new EU anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) rules will be extended to the entire crypto sector, obliging all crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) to conduct due diligence on their customers. This means that they will have to verify facts and information about their customers.
What? Can you say more? In many cases, ripgrep's speed is due in part to integrations with the default regex engine that don't happen with PCRE2.
I'm wondering if due to the station being at the same pressure as outside a catastrophic breach is less likely. Slow flooding versus implosion.
> to decrease tax evasion

Through a very obscure logic, since payment cap cannot exclude unregistered payments.
Another issue is passing those CSV files across international borders - a CSV file that works in the UK (commas as separators and a decimal point) may not be readable in Germany (semicolons as separators and decimal commas) without some configuration.
He says that the error rate on his tax reporting was established eventually by the auditors at less than 0.1% of the total amount due, so I'm not sure what you're going on about.
Anyone can sign any piece of paper. The question is whether the state should spend effort on the enforcement of said contract.

Liber(al,atarian) "Freedom of contract" is easily refuted child-philosophy. Society not choosing to spend communal resources enforcing your stupid contract is not an abridgement of individual rights.

That is the starting point, then we can get into "contracts made under duress" with the understanding that its not incumbent on society to judge the situation perfectly every time, because ultimately society is extending a favor not a right to the contractees.
What I’ve been missing in tauri is being able to manipulate the window title bar similar to firefox or vscode (electron actually allows this).

Anyway, regarding your IPC bottleneck: I found it faster to spawn a local websocket server in rust and let my vue app connect to it. It’s really ugly and I hate myself for working like this, but albeit the tcp overhead it is actually faster for transferring bigger amounts of data than IPC.
> It really sucks to be disqualified then have to serve your contract in something that you would have never signed up for in the first place.

Welcome to the military. It's not about you, it's about serving and fulfilling the needs of your branch. They could definitely improve here but it's not exactly a surprise.
I used to think this, but now that I know a bunch of these cloud tools; I think these frameworks standardise things between companies.

Kafka is well documented and understood. Your custom postgres solution is not.

Best case you write high quality maintainable code and have a single dependency. Worst case is you create a complete mess that takes months to onboard people.

Right now I'm contracting on a project that uses AWS BATCH, docker, kubernetes, terraform, Nextflow, Django and postgres. It took me 2 days to on-board myself and start delivering features because everything was standard.
I like using .then for chaining stuff, like this:

sig { params(obj: T.untyped).void }
def write(obj)
obj
.then { Array(_1) }
.then { @wrapper.pack(_1) }
.then { @deflate.deflate(_1, Zlib::SYNC_FLUSH) }
.then { @body.write(_1) }
end
Or Death Eaters, as they prefer to be called.
i can't hear 'easy to do business' and not also hear 'i wish i could just sell poison apples to people without all this government getting in my way'.

regulation is what makes a market trustworthy. a trustworthy market is an efficient market.
You could just do same thing with normal money tho ?
Bamboo seems like an intriguing alternative to trees.
Replying with "continue" does basically what you want. The only issue is that it breaks the webpage's formatting when it tries to continue in the middle of a code block. It will produce the rest of the code but it won't be in a code block and some special characters get interpreted as other format codes.
As someone who used to do webdev and now works in Python, I've been wanting something like this for a while.

The barrier of writing both a front and backend for a simple demo/viz tool is pretty high (relative to the time it takes).
If you dig into finance theory they're not as different as you might think. And it gets even fuzzier when you consider instruments like convertible bonds.
It is indeed a scam what Booz Allen is doing.

Matt Stoller talks about it here >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69QRnm0shCc
My problem with liveview IMHO is that it requires an active internet connection and doesn't have offline support, which is a step in the wrong direction in terms of UI performance to me.

It makes sense for a subset of applications that require connectivity but many apps or tools should be able to work offline or without a constant connection.
This isn't the only one... JS frontend world as a whole has been moving back to SSR for the last 5yrs. But importantly while still maintaining the benefits of desktop-style interactivity, instant page transitions, componentized code organization, treeshaking/
+ lots of small JS/CSS files only loading what's needed vs one massive asset, cached/offline friendly JSON data streams, etc, etc.

It is still SSR but it's much much more than just going back to 2005. Combining the lessons of the last 15yrs with the as much of the past SSR world as possible. It's not simply throwing it away and regressing to the old ways.
Good point. I considered adding more details, but felt they were off-topic to the purpose of my post, and didn't want to have the "thank you, brave soul for running an exit node. Your actions might enable other good things that you might not have expected" message lost in noise.

There was a captive portal page (another hacky script running as a CGI) where the user had to agree to, "not be a dick" to continue. And, the user also had to agree that they were aware that others, who were dicks, could be accessing their data if it was not encrypted and gave the example of http vs. https in the address bar of the browser.

There was also a picture of an onion on the captive portal page, and a link to a FAQ which talked about open wifi and Tor. Exit nodes were not geo restricted, so if nothing else, the warnings and explanations allowed the users to understand why sites often seemed to think they were in a different country.

There is a limit to what people are able to digest about a subject that is not one they focus on. But, the warnings (right on the main captive portal page; without having to navigate to the FAQ) were sufficiently scary to encourage caution.

The most likely available alternative would have been public access terminals in the library, or other open wifi for those with portable devices. Public access terminals could be running keyloggers and worse. Even if the public terminal is free of malware, the non-technical user might just close a logged in browser tab/window, not realizing that is not sufficient to log them out.

Yes, even with users being careful about looking for https in the URL bar, some websites are broken and use https for their login page, but use http for their session cookies. But, trying to protect from these incompetent websites would require shutting down all public wifi everywhere (OWE [opportunistic wifi encryption without authentication] did not exist yet).

I think my open wifi (and open wifi generally, as well as Tor) were/are a net good. If, after this additional detail you still disagree, then we will just have to disagree.
The small sample size and age of the experiment makes it not very relevant to today.
Yes it’s called ‘structuring’ or smirking and is variously restricted in many places since it’s an obvious on-ramp to money laundering and tax evasion.
IMO, I think this is a valid question (though asked a bit crudely). To generalize, it's because someone who has done JavaScript programming can point to NodeJS and say, "I'm full stack." Which, while technically true, skates over the reality of NodeJS as a less than ideal backend (see Ryan Dahl and the dawn of Deno). Second, it's more lucrative to bill oneself as "full stack" even if in reality a person isn't. At one point in my career I would have considered myself "full stack". Over time I realized that a "full stack" engineer is a jack-of-all-trades type, which in theory, can be valuable in the right circumstances as an individual doing work alongside non-full-stack engineers. Asking a room full of "full stack" engineers to design and build a product of any complexity above CRUD will naturally lead to a self-sorting of UI/UX and server side engineers.
Gall's Law:

> A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work. You have to start over with a working simple system.

A SQL database, maybe supplemented by a cache, can carry most projects as far as they'll ever go. And if you outgrow it, replace it with something that meets your new needs.

Any given project's "right tool for the job" can change over the project's lifetime, and optimizing for problems you don't have is quite harmful.
Unless you offer a $100K cleaning program.
I understand your willingness to attribute wrong behavior to the correct culprit.

But, how does it come, that these procedures to get building permits have been slowed down/bureaucratized to the point that it almost seems intentional?

Also, the anger is not about them intentionally shortening supply - it’s about them intentionally asking and taking the higher prices. Nobody forces them to take more than e.g. a 10% shortage signal markup, but we force people on the other side to wipe the floor with their dignity.
The counterpoint is that energy can be difficult to transport, but the atmosphere dissipates carbon for free.
So it might sense to do this where you produce energy, to use up extra energy which could be otherwise wasted.
Sure, but Linux is also on more devices than any other OS in the world.

Your statement would be more damning it Linux was a minority player or on the decline, but that's not the case.

Procfs seems... fine, really.
> Forking processes seems like a rather elegant concept, to me.

Forking is good because it saves you a rich process manipulation API, and because generally speaking doing things to an execution environment always ends up more clunky than doing things in one. (Cleaning up after doing them is another matter.)

Forking is bad[1] because it (essentially if not literally) forces memory overcommit on you, at which point resource accounting becomes hopeless.

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/785430/
Just FYI, something happened with the end of this sentence:
> We’re happy to travel to you, or can sponsor you to join us in NYC or San Francisco either permanently or
Goldman Sachs' Open Source Program Office, One Year In
You didn't focus your comment well enough on that aspect.
Sort of. It's a pretty low-level execution graph, so you're seeing maths being done one operation at a time (then a node that does a lot of work all at once in code, which is unhelpful if you don't literally know GLSL)

Besides that, I would say you need to know about how a pixel/fragment shader works, which can be explained without any OpenGL details:

It is a program that runs once for each pixel of the screen, taking its coordinates within the screen as input (called UV), and outputting an RGB value.

The tricky part is not related to graphics specifically, but thinking in this stateless, independent, massively paralel way.
I agree with you, but the "scrum masters" did not want to do that, as it would not "properly account" (their words) for any work done. There was a head bean counter that actually believed the numbers, and would count up all the points and track the completed vs planned. It would cause our stats to look bad if we achieved less work completed. Personally, I did not care about stats, I would rather improve our estimation process. I thought the whole thing was a gamified sham and left.