skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This was reply inspired by some description I think I've read in Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. Voice interfaces are not yet perfect, have problems with understanding users and could misinterpret some sentences spoken to other people as spoken to it. Also when you have interfaces everywhere, you risk stumbling on and activating some controls you didn't even know exist, common troupe in films where someone presses one button and everything in a room goes crazy, along with shaking bed. My reply was not directed at you specifically, just for general class of zealots of touch (or even touchless) interfaces.
And you know this from...?
I don't think so. A nice part of walking is observing nature or architecture. The sun and the fresh air are also great.
They bought me a 1500GbP desktop when I started. When I left 9mos later I offered them 1000 for it and they accepted.

YMMV, but I expect most companies would consider such deals.
The US dollar is regulated and it’s use and transfer creates all kind of legal issues and as a result institutions that handle its storage and transfer run heavy KYC and reject unconventional use cases. When you turn it into a stablecoin you no longer have to deal with all that, you can easily trade unregistered securities and engage in ponzis without an oversight.

Okay this sounds a bit too cynical but each crypto bull market resulted in exactly that, unfortunately.
It sure was fun hearing people in Canada complaining about their first amendment rights being violated.

I didn't even know anybody was trying to remove the right for Manitoba to be a province of Canada.
The problem isn't the concept, it's the backing. If the Fed were to announce an official USD stablecoin on Ethereum the chain could be used for international settlement.

Of course, that will never happen as having the ability to restrict capital flows is a key power government wants to retain.
The economic effects are the same as in the real world...i.e. stablecoin is leverage in that one has to have more assets set aside to peg the stable coin during bear markets. In short words more assets during bear market to help maintain the one dollar peg.

Or opposite of the word stable coins during bear markets behind the scenes with the firms that have to dramatically increase the assets used to peg the one dollar value.

That means we have two leverage levers at work the crypto coin used in trades and the stable coin itself.
Both could be true: most projects facing initial blocking but eventually getting done. Would be a function of pipeline and lead time.
And yet, for it's otherwise-no-real-value it may come to pass that even Russian contractors will say, "Нет биткоина".
Most ornaments for buildings in 19th century were cast from molds, not carved. Lower quality, but much quickly and cheaply mass produced.
The restrictions are not pointless. People shouldn't have to endure AI generated spam, no matter how well-formatted.

I can opt out of robocalls, email spam, programmatic texts, even take legal action against people who make them outside the law. Similar legal protections should exist to protect people from AI spam. If there's a good technical solution to this problem then the laws banning it become less necessary.
Human cannibalism is exceedingly rare (and, if practiced longterm, leads to prion diseases which will decimate the population). A much more common practice is infanticide.
The court argued that the original photograph was not original enough to warrant copyright protection.

Yet a painted replica of the photograph was apparently original enough to win a prize and be put up for sale at a gallery.

This decision is completely absurd, so there must be some reason why the court decided the way it did.

The explanation that a Luxembourg judge at a Luxembourg court decides in favor of a Luxembourg man who just won a Luxembourg price and is represented by a popular Luxembourg lawyer just sounds very plausible.

Judges are humans too, and they are not infallible, so it seems plausible that this has something to do with the decision.
Does reasonable include paying for shipping?
By the amount of comments, never. PBT is nice where it fits, but I found for some problems the properties you define can become so complex that they need unit tests on their own. Which somehow defeats the purpose?!
You appear to think I meant to take 1/4 of the defense budget. That was only to illustrate the magnitude. You could cherry-pick your favorite US budgetary item instead and spare history.
> It was hell.

That's crazy, and no, it wasn't. Yes, there was lots of pollution. No, it wasn't hell. And much of what enables the high quality of life today with less pollution is build upon what was done then.

> It would be better to improve the environmental laws to exclude "views" as something to be protected.

And to be more focused on humans. If you weigh a city's needs vs that of field mice and you side with the activists who pretend to speak for the field mice, you've lost sight of what's important.
Pretty interesting talk about the foundation model used in chat GPT3.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=D3sfOQzRDGM
> You also can't do cell phone towers, because they are ugly (fair enough)

You can disguise cell phone towers[0]. It hurts cell phone company profits though, so they'll only do that if the cost of the cheap ugly tower is more due to objections.

[0] https://twistedsifter.com/2012/08/examples-of-cell-phone-tow...
Talk about Indian Giving lol... Jesus
My JPEGs are significantly larger than 90kB. At this point you're just trolling.
Data protection sounds like a huge brainwashing that Germans have been submitted to. At my work we analyze driving data, but our internal portal cannot be made public (with public I mean accessible within the company's intranet) because there might be people and cars in the video and this would violate their data protection rights.

In the end everything need some extra layers of bureaucracy to comply with the laws or is simply not done. And the funny part is that many think this is how it works in other countries too.
This seems like a very nicely detailed response to OPs question. Thanks! Your response brought up some questions and remarks from myself.

> DM can be falsified perfectly well.

I recall hearing that DM was attempted to be falsified based on gravitational lensing. Is that correct?

> If DM interacts purely gravitationally, then yes, considering it either matter or an artifact of space-time is merely a matter of preference. Simply move the DM part of the energy-stress tensor on the other side of the Einstein equation.

Would DM as matter not have inertia, whereas treating it like an artifact of space-time would leave it without inertia?

> Differentiating it from MoND or similar theories will then be based purely on how well the theory fits.

A simple question here would be: do all galaxies of similar size have the same amount of dark matter. If so, then the uniformity of dark-matter would need explanation. If not, then I think something like MoND would have a hard time explaining why these similar galaxies rotate at different speeds.
>Ugh, can these growth hacking types stop trying to make everything into a "thing"? Can one just go out for a bloody walk without someone saying they need to make the best out of it, and to use it for spiritual and career growth.

No, many people can't just go for a walk as evident by the fact that they don't. Laying out the benefits can help convince some people to walk that currently don't. Just because articles like this aren't useful for you it doesn't mean there aren't useful for others.
Classic. People not wanting multinationals fracking their land or building new gas and oil plants is "snooty environmentalists on their high horses on a power trip"
I think that’s not quite right. Precedents have a lesser role but are definitely relevant. My law classes in the Netherlands extensively covered important rulings as a way to interpret laws.
Free daily sudoku websites monetized with (a few) ads have provided steady income for nearly 20 years now and require very little maintenance:

https://samurai-sudoku.com

https://sudokuprintables.org

https://fiendishsudoku.com

https://extremesudoku.info

For a while after the dot com bust I sold music CDs via Amazon and also refurbished docking stations and power adapters for laptops.
Here is a pretty interesting talk about the foundation model used in ChatGPT.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=r8ajJKDiT6s
Very likely, there is secure boot.
What about nuclear? If I understand correctly, there was nuclear capacity being closed while coal is still burnt in substantial numbers.
Japanese 漢字 reader here. I don't know how Chinese traditionally splits characters in parts, but I had really weird matchings. Like in the case of 日常 as the guessed word, the character I chose first was 剪, and that matched everything except the three strokes at the top of 常, and I have no idea why.In 剪, it highlighted the horizontal stroke at the top of 前, as well as 月 and the leftmost stroke of 刂. I guess the 日 comes from 月, which seems like a stretch, but the rest is a mystery.

Overall, as someone without knowledge of Chinese characters except the ones that exist in Japanese, I found it way too easy.

Interesting concept, though.
Probably have IT throw it at some pile and then hand out if someone asks and they don't have fresh ones around.

On other hand in current open office/hot seating just leaving ready setups on desks make actual sense.
I'm the author of lossless WebP. From my personal point of view I agree, the benefits of WebP lossy were too marginal to balance off its weaknesses (I have observed somewhat unpredictable quality, tendency to blurring, occasional reduction of saturation, and limitation to 420).

I like MozJPEG in the lower quality range, but I'm disappointed with it in the medium-to-high quality range (q85-100) -- there guetzli or jpegli does quite a bit better. Often MozJPEG appears worse than libjpeg-turbo in the highest quality whereas both guetzli and jpegli are substantially (~35 %) better.
Hey, thanks so much for the thorough review! I'll definitely put some thought into making the game harder and less down to chance, maybe with different difficulty levels.

On ren2 vs shu4, there are some characters/components that have decompositions missing in the Make Me a Hanzi database unfortunately. I think this may be one of those cases, or it's a bug. Will look into it. Thanks again!
Yet black holes do interact with ordinary matter--they can consume it--and they emit Hawking radiation. Dark matter does not appear to be doing either of those things.
Few do that. A theory of existence would be a religion, which is distinct from science. Some people shift some books by saying Quantum XYZ is the new snake oil. Thats not religion or science, but a sham.
Half-OT: people are always talking about ChatGPT being AI, but is this actually the case?

It frequently told me that it doesn't learn from my input, and I had the impression the unique selling point of AI was it being able to modify it's own code in response to input.
AI to combat racism
Ask HN: Growing a Blog?
How does one build an engaged audience?

Ive done 4 blog posts so far and really enjoy writing, but don't seem to get much engagement. I think ~100 people read each blog but I get max 1 comment and one or two (free) subs. Am I doing something wrong?
JavaScript itself is entirely backwards compatible back to 2002. If anything, I'd argue raw .NET is far worse than raw JS for backwards compatibility, because .NET has depreciated entire languages like VB6.

To compare something like React to .NET, let's look at .NET libraries and frameworks. For example: Sliverlight, WebForms, WPF, WCF SOAP, old versions of EF, or old versions of MVC. It's not been pretty for .NET, and you're in a bad place if you still have a Sliverlight app in 2022 because it only runs on IE11.

Every language and library suffers/benefits from the onward march of progress. It's disingenuous to claim JS is the only ecosystem that has significant churn.
If you are looking for a good replacement for InfluxDB, then take a look at VictoriaMetrics. It accepts data in Influx line protocol [1] and it needs less RAM and disk space comparing to InfluxDB [2].

[1] https://docs.victoriametrics.com/#how-to-send-data-from-infl...

[2] https://valyala.medium.com/insert-benchmarks-with-inch-influ...
Singapore is an authoritarian one-party state and Netherlands has the tax haven problem. I'd at least count them off.
Thank you for the clarification. I did not look at the surrounding code.

However, my point still stands that extracting the complex expression as delta would have helped and possibly avoided the original bug.

int const delta = (cp[IPOPT_OLEN] - 1);

Further proof is that the original author first commited a broken fix. Again this was caused by the confusion between delta and delta-1, which would have been clear had delta been explicitly named.

This sort of code is just begging to be misunderstood.

- if (cp[IPOPT_OLEN] > 0 && cp[IPOPT_OLEN] < hlen) {

+ if (cp[IPOPT_OLEN] > 0 && (cp[IPOPT_OLEN] - 1) <= hlen) {
If you maintaining a proprietary database technology solves a problem that provides some shareholder value, then go ahead and do it.

Maintaining off the shelf software that you got from Github provides no shareholder value whatsoever, however. It is a pure cost center.

As a CTO you do not want to be the guy that runs a pure cost center department.
Sanctioning a government fighting a war is very different from sanctioning people who want to engage in the economy without violence.

I would argue the more the economic exchange to violence ratio is between two groups, the better it is for both groups (maybe not the leaders)
The Netherlands are captured by narcotics “gangs”. They have corrupted courts and politicians. Too much money for too small country.
Which is Mutually Assured Destruction. I can't think of many occasions in which financial elites would destroy their own wealth in pursuit of political (?) goals.

The one incident I can think of didn't end well.
>Quite pretentious for some monkeys who just learned how to fly 4 generations ago.

And the very same monkeys were quite pretentious to try to find a way to fly when God did not gave them wings.
> Cashiers cheques, not personal ones.

Yes. Virtually nobody uses them in Europe.
This is one of those 'it's ok when we do it' scenarios. Where its okay when occupy wallstreet, Antifa or another leftist cause occupy somewhere 'illegally', but not those damn truckers.
Wait what if the reply that ggm is not GPT, is made by GPT?
I don't think that's particularly surprising. If what we'd call a standard mechanism today (like using an option) had been in use first, why would there have been the need to change it to something that is done elsewhere at most rarely (special form of argv[0]) would have been introduced later?
I can confirm this. I devoted a section of my website (about immigration) to immigrant-friendly banks.

Many banks have restrictions that make it hard for immigrants to open an account, even though they're entitled to one by law.

For example, many banks use the same ID verification services, and those don't recognise Indian passports. Others refuse Americans because they're a bureaucratic nightmare to deal with. Others require a registered address which is hard to get without a bank account. Others require a residence permit or even permanent residency. You usually need a bank account before you have either.

Bureaucracy gets messy at the edges.
That's funny, shortly after I made my comment I had a faint recollection of Comcast v. Cogent. I'm still not sure who to blame in that pissing match. Comcast is one of the most hated retail ISPs in the US while Cogent is one of the most hated bargain basement Tier 1.5 transit ISPs in the country. While I'd genuinely have a difficult time picking sides in such a fight I think that in the end, I'd have to side with Comcast, as much as I hate to say it. I'd love to hear from people more in the mix than me on the topic.
interesting, so it's like a neighborhood between 2 major roads that has signs prohibiting through traffic?
In scenario two, person B goes tries to use the cash, turns out it's counterfeit. They now have no money and no car.
IPv6 is a religion, you will not reason with its adepts.

Of course they will claim that the whole world is "doing it wrong", despite the collective failure of humanity to roll out IPv6 for decades and decades.
I wonder if AI can do something like, here is a new programming language that has been written which provides better error handling and concurrency. Anyways, its the hot buzz now and everyone is using it. So do this for me, here is the source code of the language and its documentation.

Understand all that and create an app for me that does the work X.
Small, committed groups are often highly influential in democracies on certain topics - whether median people want something or not can be a bit different.
Was occupy wall street not a protest? Should bank accounts have been frozen to donators to that cause?
The funny thing is, that cash is often used for deals, because you general have to pay taxes and fees depending on the value.

So someone might officially pay 20.000€ for a piece of land, pay the taxes and fees based on that price, but pay the remaining 60.000€ in cash.

Obviously this is illegal, but the notaries are in on it.
they do, but that right also comes with responsibility, which by virtue of them committing a crime, they have to answer for. If they escape the authorities, freezing their financial accounts is not completely out of the ordinary, and forces them to confront the authorities.

So yes, they have the right to buy food, but also the obligation to answer for their crimes in an open court. Can't have one without the other.
>Do you think that some form of AI will be able to do the job of an average programmer any time soon?

No. AI is not a greater threat than stack overflow.

The skills of a programmer are not generating 20 lines of code to solve a well known problem.
And even a 99% AI is next to useless, since finding errors is exceedingly hard.
Sure, but a desktop computer with 50% higher scores than a laptop with "laptop version of cpu" will cost less than the laptop (even counting a monitor), so I'm not sure that comparison holds.

For example, an HP Elitedesk 800 mini (very small, so using SO-DIMMs and integrated everything - basically a non-portable laptop) will run you around 800 Euros, while the "equivalent" Elitebook 830/840 will run you 1500 euros. Specs are "similar", same generation mid-level i5, same RAM, same SSD. Main difference is the Elitedesk will have desktop-class CPU. Throw in a cheap HP screen (200 euro - Elitebook laptops have ridiculously bad screens, so that's fair), and you get to 2/3 the price of the laptop.
> dark matter is adhoc value that was calculated

Well the overall tone of your comment is pretty crummy but this is absolutely not true. You got this exactly backwards. Dark matter is just missing mass that is being observed. It doesn't patch any model, because physicists don't know what it is or what it is made of. But whatever that mass is, it is there, because all the standard ways that we observe mass, it exhibits. So it would instead be a leap to "patch the standard model"--whatever you mean by that--with these other "better alternatives" (I assume you mean MOND? No dice there, doesn't explain gravitational lensing).
Well it definitely is one of the proposed solutions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial_black_hole
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massive_compact_halo_object
Yea.. I'm sure he'll remember to report that money to the tax authorities.
ChatGPT open-source project for Android
ChatGPT Android demonstrates OpenAI's ChatGPT on Android with Stream Chat SDK for Jetpack Compose.
If it is not falsifiable, it is not science nor physics. It is meta-physics, ersatz-religion. Which is exactly the core of the complaint against concepts like this.

Of course same thinking can't easily be applied to things that are not always true, like social behaviour. Part of the reason the replication crisis hit so hard in the social sciences.

And of course this is not really as absolute as I wrote above. No field works like this all the time. But it is a good guideline. If falsifiability is completely ignored, then a concept really is nothing more than a religious belief and should be considered as such.

BTW, Popper did not publish in the 19th century.
No... https://www.healthline.com/health/smallpox-vaccine-scar
Compensation doesn't undo the damage.

>Builders would make a loss on projects that caused lots of environmental harm, so wouldn't build in the first place.

I doubt that. They would create companies for removing forrests and after they lost in court they would file bankruptcy.

The damage is done and the compensation is void. And even if they pay, money doesn't consume carbon dioxide.
If AI technology continues to advance and is able to take over most jobs, it will fundamentally change the way society functions.

In a capitalist economy, people are expected to work hard in order to produce goods and services, which drives economic growth. But if AI can do all of the work, there may be no need for people to work at all.

This could lead to a new economic model, one where prosperity is not tied to the labor of individuals. Instead, the focus could shift to ensuring that everyone has access to the resources and opportunities they need to thrive, regardless of whether they are working or not.
Didn't he operate in Germany? The country that allowed the fraud was Germany.
This is the oracle problem. The guarantees of blockchain and smart contracts only work with things on the blockchain. You can’t put US dollars on the blockchain obviously so you create a cryptocurrency that is on the blockchain and peg it to the US dollar.

In reality you haven’t solved anything because there’s a trust element. It’s just moved. Also you need deep reserves to maintain a peg. There have been several attempts at an algorithmic stablecoin but they’ve had a tendency to collapse spectacularly.

Maintaining a peg in the real world is tricky too. Real world pegs can and do fail.
US imports of Russian enriched uranium, platina, cobalt... are now highest in history. Please leave empty moralising out of this.

I am paying for programming services. Traditional banking system is unreliable, so I use crypto. Nothing illegal or unethical!
I'd say it's more likely to impact legal industry or any kind of data based job. Programming is more on the compute side.
It will depend on the number of antennas in your client and AP and the wifi tech. MIMO and beamforming make interference less impactful, but that's offset by the increasing number of devices.
> In what cases does the security from 1-factor exceed the security from 2-factors?

1. If you consider the loss of a phone number to be a more likely event than a forgotten password (non-obvious example - if you have no extra money to keep the phone number working).

2. If some powerful contractors can capture the data coming to your phone.

3. Also, if there is some kind of banhammer (Google is famous for banning for no reason) in the "2-factor" and no banhammer in the 1-factor (Bitcoin has no third-parties who might steal or freeze your funds), then your chance of encountering a banhammer in your face is infinitely greater in the first case.

More than 1 factor creates more problems than usefullness tbh if you are enough responsible for never lose your credentials.
The German green party is against nuclear for spurious reasons, and too proud to admit wrongness.
I couldn't think of a worse clickbait title than this. The quote has nothing to do with C.
So you close Putin's and a couple of other credit cards and let everyone else continue a normal life? Maybe fairer to some individuals (like those already acting in opposition), but certainly a completely ineffective sanction.
The Doom
Apologies I forgot about those people, who really are in a vulnerable position.