skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is the bright side of the coin. The dark side is that it's by pushing ourselves that we improve. ChatGPT is going to result in a new equilibrium here...
The face of the person in the painting is recognizable across the copying, I don't see how it can not be a copyright issue. Clearly cribbed her work completely and changed some color and details.
Happy to hear it, you're welcome! :)
It wasn't, no. It was meant to clarify for other readers that people didn't have their bank accounts frozen for protesting COVID; they had their bank accounts frozen for financially supporting or participating in an illegal occupation of a city centre.

Your point stands that governments/courts decide what is illegal and that they have the power to freeze bank accounts when those accounts are used to fund illegal activities.
So ChatGPT will be useful for people to skate even longer if they don't have basic composition skills.
All art is highly subjective - "I know it when I see it."

I think what I want to say is that the world around art is weird to me.

As for money laundering, Jackson Pollock comes to mind.

https://medium.com/@MichaelMcBride/how-jackson-pollock-and-t...

And politicians receiving vast sums of money for their "art." Makes one go "hmmm."

https://www.indiatimes.com/culture/who-we-are/wtf-mamata-ban...
There are plenty if you know how to look for them, though some, such as grammaticalised palatalisation, are incidental, and others, such as the preservation of the habitual are more obvious. That said, the various Celtic languages are thought to have more historically in common with the Italic branch of languages (the remaining instances of that being the various Romance languages) than they do with the Slavic ones.
Maybe the language is jarring, but some kind of apology and admission of guilt is often typical in plea bargain arrangements.
This doesn't apply to everything. But yeah redis does what it does really well. I almost feel like I want to spin redis up before I spin a DB up. It is excellent tech. Can use it for caching. Sessions. Distributed locks (niche but when you need it it's fantastic).

But yeah I think this is more applied to the folks who decide to spin up a large service when they just need a messaging layer that their DB can solve for them. It has non insignificant cost.

Redis is pretty low maintenance tho in many configs (k8s, on a vm, or a service like on aws have all basically been zero maintenance for me).
Over the last 10 years we have been growing our JS + PHP + MySQL framework and unifying the code across all concepts.

We started before Promises were standard, before composer and NPM. Before Virtual DOM. Back when we started, there was CodeIgniter and Kohana and jQuery (anyone remember?)

Along the way, we kept the vast majority of our code in-house. We didn’t want to pull in libraries or updates unless we understood their code.

Looking at the latest and greatest, we were often wondering if we did the right thing. Some developers (especially JS) used to chastize us for not using the latest techniques like “two way bindings” of Angular 1.0 or JSX of React

Then - lo and behold - Angular 1.0 is totally rewritten and all those concepts are redone. Over and over. And people come around to our way of thinking. Web Components and Templates appear. Shadow DOM.

Our way of thinking is: use standards for HTTP/REST, HTML, HTTP, JS, CSS as they were intended. Every concept should work well with all the others.

Result is at https://github.com/Qbix/Platform if you want to give any feedback. We have been using it for ALL our projects since 2011.
Can anyone stop a bus? Does it stop automatically if the driver has a heart attack? Will all the passengers die?

Can anyone land a plane? Does it land automatically if the pilot has a heart attack? Will all the passengers die?

The outcomes are quite different.
You can also just not take a stance on many things. I feel like a lot of the things we feel strongly about, and often end up as parts of our identity, just... don't really matter. For things where you do need to take a stance, perhaps because there's a decision that needs to be made, there's still a difference between holding a loose opinion (that you allow to be challenged, and are willing to change your mind in the face of new evidence or a better argument), and making that opinion a part of your very core (where you will just stand firm and ignore all criticism).
No, it hasn't always been; you're conflating historically consistent and reasonable cycles with the speculative manias that have occurred over the past two decades. Make no mistake: we are not in a normal cycle.

What's a "normal" cycle? Cycles all differ. Some are extreme like in 2008 and others are much more muted.

But regardless, housing cycles have always happened. Even Shiller admits this.
The concept of a Home Owners Association (I had to google it) is a pretty American one too, so it seems fitting to pay it via cheque.
Indeed, what's going on here?
Oh I don’t have experience teaching a second language but I have quite a bit of experience teaching programming. Luckily, when I’ve taught programming it’s been in a context where there is no need to validate the learners acquisition outside of their own satisfaction.

In a school setting however, there is a strong urge by both the students and the teachers and the external system to provide some sort of “proof” that a standardized level of comprehension has been achieved. Students want to get As, teachers want reproducible methods, and administrators want standardization.

My intuition is that language acquisition, more than almost any other subject, has to be done naturally, idiosyncratically, and non-linearly. This is horrible from the perspective of needing to provide a test at the end of the class.
The 737 MAX crashes were in 2019. These companies don't have our safety as a top priority anymore and things being "proven safe" obviously is not something that can be held high. I don't see how I could trust an automated flight, if even the biggest aircraft producer in the world cannot make automated systems that won't kill 200 people in one go, in a matter of minutes, in 2019, without the pilot's knowledge.
This sounds like a completely bullshit argument.

There are close to 20 billions $ of Russian oligarchs frozen assets now - I bet almost none of it was acquired in cash.

While of course there are some that do use cash, the bigger offenders are not - so it may be a good idea to start with the real problems…
... cheaper still, Im experimenting with two 3-litre plastic milk containers, filled with water.

[ be sure to a) check for leakages regularly and b) do arm curls well away from electric outlets, just in case ]
It's wild this is a concern for you, when this is extremely normal for billions of people.
Ah yes that would actually be a great combo.
> some asterisks like paved roads only

Some asterisks like non-paved roads will cause poor and potentially dangerous performance, technically.

If I tell it to drive into a volcano, and getting it to do so is significantly harder than five minutes of repeating various variations on "Yes, I know it's a volcano and will likely destroy the car and everything in it; do so anyway.", it's defective. (Preferably it also should not be significantly easier, of course, at least not to the point of being able to do so accidentally.)
There was a clear precedent set many years ago when an artist did this exact thing and lost in court. The photograph was of a Native American in profile with specific headgear that was copied into a computer illustration. We are talking 1990s here. No idea how to find it.
> Talking layer of DOM nodes, I actually did a few samples of this the other day.

Is there a tool for this? I’m kind of wanting to check my site now…
1k EUR is a lot to carry in cash. 10k is absurd. I'd guess 95% of people doing it are doing it because they're doing something illegal.
1. If you expect to need a build (since you’re using Nuxt now that seems like a fair given): Vite is probably the best current intersection of easy setup, good defaults, easily discoverable tweaks, high quality integrations. I’ve held off build tool churn for several projects for a couple years now, but after spinning up yet another local exploratory project with Vite today, and minimal fuss for a very unusual use case[1] I can’t recommend anything else anymore.

2. If you’re already familiar with Vue, and have no problems with it, the only reason I’d stray is because stuff in JSX-land is getting around to addressing many of the problems people (rightly or wrongly) complain about here. Weather React Server Components, Qwik which ships minimal JS bundle and data by design, or Solid with recent support for partial hydration… the component story being good for UX is increasingly compelling for JSX. I wouldn’t recommend any of these in particular unless you share more about how you’d prefer to develop.

3. If I were to recommend any meta-framework it’d be Astro. I’d have stronger recs for Solid Start but it’s explicitly not stable at present. Astro also has the benefit of being UI library agnostic which is a good gradual story.

4. Take literally all of this with a grain of salt. Part of the reason all these tools have a bad rep is from trying stuff when existing tools are imperfect but serviceable. Happy to share some ideas of where to look, but if I’m choosing anything for my current projects under maintenance I’m starting with how they can be adapted and reconfigured to solve whatever problems they don’t already solve. I’m only even looking at other tooling because there’s serious gaps in the existing setup.

1: Porting a legacy XML-centric project away from proprietary server dependencies which take ~8 min to build and has gobs of incidental complexity and tons of performance problems… to run in a browser really fast. It took a few minutes to figure out how to set up the project to load static XSLT assets as ESM modules, as well as dynamically loading XML payloads both from local fixtures and as library input. Builds are instantaneous and runtime is fast enough I can sell running it in a headless browser as a major incremental improvement. I can probably also sell scrapping a whole server target, or at least its persistence layer, because it’s fast enough the primary responsibility (caching) is either moot or solvable in the browser.
If someone would offer me 10k in cash instead of a bank transfer I would assume they are a criminal anyway...
Getting Started with Pixar’s Universal Scene Description
Let's stop calling it ink and start calling it licensing fluid, because it is.
At least to start it’s pretty simple. Have a single physical pilot with the ability for a remote pilot to take over in the event of incapacitation, bathroom breaks, etc. The real pilot can always override the remote piloting system through some kind of physical disconnect.
Earth Infinity Puzzle
We're getting pretty off topic, but it wasn't what they were protesting that was illegal, it was how they did it. For a US comparison, First Amendment rights don't include a right to occupy city streets for weeks, even if you're doing it to protest the government.
Says the guy hypocritically from his smartphone.

Technology has solved so many problems. It's also created new ones. But we're way better off, there's no question of that.
Sport and politics have always been intertwined. Sportsmen making political gestures is as old as sport itself, far from being just a recent thing.

Examples:

South African sports boycotts in the 1970s.

NFL in 1945 and the breakdown of segregation with the associated controversy vs the more inclusive football leagues in the US.

The class divide between rugby league and rugby union over a century ago.

The banning of russian sports teams due to rampant drug use in particular sports, vs the propaganda potential of olympic victory, the boycott of the Moscow olympics.

The black power salutes at the mexico olympics.

If you think taking a knee is some kind of new thing, that is wrong.
I would not be surprised if newer parents shadow the public domain stuff. Patent evergreening is the term of art if you wanna know more.
Or because you don't need to do it on a schedule, just do it in a cold desert with high DNI like mongolia and use 60c/W thermal heliostats which are capable of higher temperatures for the heat rather than $4/W thermal nuclear.
It’d be neat if chatgpt encoded a signature via steganography of some sort, sort of like a watermark
> but the same person and the same clothes, up to its individual folds.

It's not the same person. The face is very different, as is the hair. not the same folds either, look at the white cloth near the flower. It's also a painting and not a photograph. If a painter creates a painting of Grand Central Station has he violated the copyright of the architect? Artists must be able to create, by their own hand, their own versions of things depicted in other works of art or even of other artistic works themselves. (see for example https://publicdelivery.org/fernando-botero-mona-lisa/)
Why don't you get an electric car and battery instead?
Is this just a site for people to steal authors' work?
The rest is luck.
Well this is one aspect - application should not have to care about underlying db topology - if it does then the db is wrong, my main issue tbh is that other databases implement the inevitable like proxying or sharing while postgres leaves it to horrific perl scripts from the last century, it's really not admissable as a production solution
it is worth remembering that occupy wallstreet was also declared 'an illegal occupation of a city centre'
The Welsh column are just the regular Welsh numbers, put there from comparison with the sheep-counting numbers used in areas where a language similar to Welsh was once spoken. Welsh and Gaelic evolved independently and though they now sound very different, they're still closely related - with common vocabulary not shared by other languages, and similar grammars.
It's not a carbon copy and the changes aren't minimal - thus it's inspired, not copied.

After all, copyright works for whole thing, not spare parts (technique, style or "idea" aren't copyrightable)...
When I hear about making overflow safe by making it wrap my main question is how much code is actually ready for overflow? I've seen many vulnerabilities where a bounds check was bypassed because a computation overflowed. It seems that the only really safe behaviour here is crashing. If you aren't going to pay the cost of these checks may as well call it undefined behaviour and allow optimizations. (of course also including wrapping integer types in your language for when you do want to handle wrapping).
> I would fly domestic automated flights if the automation was proven as safe, the above conditions were met, and the price was 40-50% cheaper.

You believe pilot salaries are 40-50% of airline ticket prices? A pilot makes ~130K per year and flies, say, 2 trips a day, so ~500 trips a year. So on a plane with 200 people, they are each paying about $1.30 per pilot. Two pilots, round it up to $5 per trip. That's how much you'd save if the automation system was free.

But, hey, I'd also fly an automated flight that was proven safe for a 50% discount. Even a manual flight.
Not always. A popular step is to buy an expensive car in Germany using cash, then bring it to another country. Germany is central to many money laundering schemes because of the prevalence of cash payments there.
Can we have one thread without bashing facebook? It’s incredibly off topic.
I have never observed ads, and still do not observe any ads on Z Library—it looks like the same old Z.
Moreover, when it's on "domestic" opinion (as stated in the article), this has nothing to do anymore with warfare... it's just tools to undermine democracy at home. And any weakening of democracy is probably to the benefit of enemy countries in the long-term...
How do you know the cash isn't fake?
I typed a few paragraphs into this from OP's article and it judged them >60% real.

Edit: I typed a few sentences I made up myself and it judged them >90% fake. I don't think it works very well.
For more context:

Remedy Entertainment (developers of Control and Max Payne) have released a guidebook to Pixar’s Universal Scene Description library and format (https://graphics.pixar.com/usd/release/index.html)

This is following their presentation (https://youtu.be/FI2pyzTOvaQ) on their internal adoption of USD to the Academy Software Foundation (https://www.aswf.io/) which is part of the Linux Foundation and comprises many VFX/animation/game studios and tech companies.
And if someone illegally occupies the front seat of a bus, or a diner counter? Is it also okay to keep them from something that belongs to them then?
There's no new tunneling for this one -- just new above-ground stations, and rehab on pre-existing bridges and track. The work really isn't comparable.
Yes, that's what de facto priority means. Since the railroads operate the lines and the freight trains, they (illegally) give their own freight trains priority over Amtrak passenger trains, which by law are supposed to have priority.
That’s a different trade off in the case of a deranged pilot or hijackers. Similarly something easy to disconnect is likely to accidentally disconnect, while something difficult to disconnect might not be fast enough.

A much larger issue is copilots do a significant amount of work especially in an emergency while also gaining experience in the aircraft. This means a steady stream of highly experienced senior pilots on the exact airframe being flown.
> For a US comparison, First Amendment rights don't include a right to occupy city streets for weeks, even if you're doing it to protest the government.

That’s interesting to hear, because a group of political activist have occupied a couple of city blocks in my city for a couple of weeks, declared independence, intimidated and harassed residents and businesses, and murdered a bunch of people there, but nobody has ever been arrested or prosecuted for any of that (including murders). Maybe the Canadians have heard the story of CHAZ and thought they their government will also be as lenient. Turns out that they were very wrong.
Architects in my company are required to have aws certificates. They can be monkeys but if they can list a dozen of AWS products and put everything there they are given the keys of everything.
If this is true then I am going to question the integrity of the site after being raided or whatever in Argentina. No reason they should ask people to help host something that they are also running ads on, and the type of ads have to be bottom of the barrel.
This is not to be celebrated. It's regulatory, capture plain and simple. Cash purchasers are subsidizing those with credit cards (and the pithy rewards they pay).
so... shitpost warning but...

Perhaps forking is the elegant refined mechanism and multi threading is the abomination that should have never been invented.

Multithreading is the concept that a process(an independent execution unit) can share memory space with another process. and it turns out you can, only at the cost of making all your memory access methods extremely fragile and error prone. The concept should have never been invented.
fair point about needing the beginners for a place to start.

The turnover issue we're seeing in the industry definitely doesn't help with seniors leading the way. which ends up being a problem top to bottom
It might not be the best tool available, but Timescale's columnar capabalities [0][1] looks great to me. I mean, being able to achieve 90%+ compression on a row-oriented database is not something to be ignored.

[0] - https://www.timescale.com/blog/building-columnar-compression...
[1] - https://www.timescale.com/blog/timescaledb-2-3-improving-col...
Six months of what to achieve what result?
I can’t get how people would react like this. The only negative point we have against this AI is that it is not always correct. Not that the responses are nonsensical, or syntaxically incorrect, or don’t have any meaning, or are out of context. Nope, just that it sometimes makes big factual mistakes.

Do you realize how thin the line has become with something truely undistinguishable from a human in just a few years ?

And yet you find that « not incredible » ??
The only thing that is humorous and disheartening is that your outlook is shared by the majority and for this, we are fucked. The inability of large corporations to best what is available to EVERY PERSON, for FREE, is a BLESSING. All these companies do is add layers of complexity or outright push a worse product and rely on changing public opinion or how info is perceived for sales. This is capitalism's kiss of death. Their goal is not healing, their goal is removal of symptoms where you will be held in perpetual subsistence. And we should never let that be forgotten.

On a macro level if you want to improve your health : Less processed foods, less synthetic materials, less pharmaceuticals, less time sitting and indoors. Less alcohol, less weed, Less involvement from these "professionals" all across the board. Less, less, less. Wow, isn't that weird?

For those who will comment for arguments sake, I would rather you provide examples of the sitting President promoting overall good health practices (read: FREE) rather than his usual gaslighting the public into taking an untested pharmaceutical product.
The tweets appear to obfuscate the actual issue.

From the thread _I guess_ that she took a standard pose of a model, then someone else came along and posed the same model in the same way?

If that's right, then the Luxembourg courts would be upholding a quite long standing position.

The following is entirely my personal opinion and in no way relates to my employment.

Consider if ordinary poses were considered creative enough to be copyright works: the first person who took a square-on head and shoulders would own the rights to that pose and no domestic-style face-on photos could be taken without a license (or, what are we at now, until 70y after their death).

Consider if you couldn't hire a model someone else had hired [to shoot standard poses], the first shoot they did might have to be their last. You'd have to pay them enough to cover their entire career; if the photographer kept the copyright (outside USA-style Fair Use) that person could never take photos of themselves again.
I don't see any ads
I don't get page transition being handled server side. They're basically just lying about that right. Maybe the server side framework baked in the page transition Js in it's response but it is still client side code
Encrypt/decrypt files with the OpenSSL CLI
encrypt and decrypt files/streams with the openssl command line.

Q: How would you improve that without increasing the simplicity of the approach?

Q: Is a random 'salt' required here, or does the aes-256-cbc do it for me anyway?
Freedom of reach is freedom of speech
This was not public knowledge, it was publicly denied.
Unfortunately this particular delivery used a typical slide presentation which deviates from a bunch of its message; and unfortunately polluting history is a pretty typical problem with these slides-as-webpage affairs. I really wouldn’t conflate the medium (which is pretty much typical of the web way before complexity as timelined) in/for the message.
Sure they do. They're those two spherical mostly-white-with-colored-circles-on-the-front things embedded in the upper half of their face. (They usually tend to call them "eyes" for some reason.) They're closed-circuit and wired pretty directly into the brain, so it's not like webcams or recording cameras where you can semi-easily get the data off somewhere else, and obviouly they're kind of wet and squishy and not-easily-electronics-compatible like most human components, but in terms of actual functionality, they're cameras.
Might depend on your choice of adblocker. Looking fine to me using ublock origin on desktop and Adguard content blockers + Mullvad's DNS blockers on iOS
ChatGPT: Background, Examples and Resources