skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> You can do all of this in the relational model […]

That… depends. Right now I am dealing with the customer's 6NF relational model which I had up until now thought was purely theoretical and was not a naturally occurring phenomena (my previous record was a 4NF some years back). ERD's for core data entities span several screens across and are, in fact, a thing of beauty, but… It is difficult to reason about the data that has historically grown over the last 20 years. The incoming data model is a document data model, therefore dependencies between data entities in such a highly normalised model need to be analysed first. A graph database turns out to be a good fit for the data relationship analysis in highly normalised relational data models as well since normalised entities effortlessly map onto graph nodes and relations onto graph edges. The document data model can be thrown into the mix on top of the relational model with new relationships being incrementally added, linking the relational and document data model entities together. Ad-hoc queries are also much simpler in the graph DB as less interesting relations can simply be ignored for a moment. In the end, graph nodes and/or edges can be enriched with extra useful properties giving one nearly complete data model migration mappings.

There is nothing with the relational model, and it is an appropriate fit for many use cases. However, if one has never gone beyond joining 3 tables in a single query for a web app, or if one has never encountered a extremelly normalised data model, it is difficult to see where the relational model falls short. Relational are also rigid and do not accommodate changes easily whereas graph models allow for new relationships to be added incrementally as the data model evolves. Also not to mention that most relational models do not venture past the 2NF model, and the dataset is typically an entangled mess of organic or historical growth.
Single-codebase full-stack in Python is an interesting thing to do, but honestly that API for UI is ugly compared to React or even React-wrapped-in-Python by way of Pyodide. [0]

[0] the approach of this blog post: https://blog.pyodide.org/posts/react-in-python-with-pyodide/
Pre-reserving domains that have been searched is a common business practice. Some domain brokers implement this at scale IIRC.

Unethical & Predatory? Sure, but it's not illegal.
Time to open a bug report :S
Meanwhile, Go has essentially solved the problem, and Rust copied the idea. Neither of those languages need to bother humans with the details of exact code layout. The post-C world is a lot better.
They shouldn’t be owned by any or even exist at all. The entire new TLD ecosystem was a disgusting cash grab.
The author is confused
Vertical panels strike me as needing quite robust supports for windy days.
> I didn't realize registrars let you buy for 10 years. The best I have seen are discounted pricing for 2-years.

I only have experience with Namecheap. They typically only offer discounted pricing for the first year, but you can pre-purchase renewals at the full price for several years (maybe up to 10, haven’t looked recently)
Social status is indeed cultural, but the search for it comes from deep instincts found in a lot of other mammals besides us. Trying to go aginst the search of a higher social status is trying to stop gravity.
Usually, but in truly pathological cases you may starve something important essentially indefinitely.
Yup, our frontend is just a wrapper around React so it is fully declarative. We are definitely more opinionated than something like Flask, but the benefit is that you can write your whole app, including the frontend, in a single language (for small apps just a single file).
Borked, has a syntax error in output_parser.js line 108.
Just make a duplicate repository under a different name for the sole purpose of codecov and other such integrations.
I have been working for Google Registry for 8.5 years now, and am the TL/M of the team. But I was not relying on memory here (how would I remember the particulars of one single domain name out of millions, especially on the first occasion it is ever coming to my attention?). I simply don't understand the OP's claims given that I have confirmed in our system that the domain name 'forum.dev' is and always been premium and was billed as premium at the time of initial registration.
Joe Rogan on 9-5 jobs and college
One of my favorite books which I discovered here on HN. Love

the writing style. Even my 6 year old loves it. Somewhat similar are “Defying Hitler” by Sebastian Haffner (Berlin in the 1930s) and “When I Was A Little Boy” by Erich Kästner (Dresden of the 1910s).

Would love to hear more such recommendations. Doesn’t need to be German focused. Just this kind of immersive history from a personal perspective, written in a plain, clear, easy to read style.
Meh. Throw a moving blanket over it and bungee it on. Could weld up a cart to roll them all at once sideways. Could use spring casters like for gates as a suspension. Or hold them in place with low durometer rubber. Or both. Probably want them sideways for footprint in my garage anyhow. It would be fun to optimize the process more each year.
Check out section 2.10(c) of the registry agreement for .dev [1]. If you registered the domain when it was a non-premium domain, and you haven't agreed to a price increase, you might have a valid complaint with ICANN.

> The parties acknowledge that the purpose of this Section 2.10(c) is to prohibit abusive and/or discriminatory Renewal Pricing practices imposed by Registry Operator without the written consent of the applicable registrant at the time of the initial registration of the domain and this Section 2.10(c) will be interpreted broadly to prohibit such practices.

I've been watching for it to happen to someone for years because I own a domain that would be at risk of getting reclassified as premium if it were allowed. I've been monitoring the same word as my domain on 300+ TLDs for about 2 years. I've never seen one get reclassified as premium without being dropped first.

Are you positive yours wasn't classified as premium with a huge discount for the first year?

I think the new TLDs would do much better if they'd quit with the pricing games and strengthen registrant rights instead. As a registrant, I want predictability and minimal risk when I register a domain. The only way to get that right now is to stick with .com AFAIK. It's too bad because I'm a huge fan of using 'somecompany.tech' plus 'somecompanytech.com', but, in my opinion, most of the new TLDs are too risky to depend on.

I'm really interested in any updates you would have because I always considered .app and .dev to be "safe" domains in the sense that I thought Google would always have transparent, uniform, predictable pricing without any exorbitant increases.

1. https://itp.cdn.icann.org/en/files/registry-agreements/dev/d...
As I understand it. most of these borrowers are on fixed rate mortgages at very low interest rates. Furthermore, with the strong labor market their wages are likely going up in nominal terms, and furthermore their chances of losing their job and not being able to find another one are also low.

Being underwater on a loan is never fun but these borrowers are in about as good a position as you could possibly be in while underwater.
Why does it even have to be a TLD? You have have a subdomain of an existing TLD. Kind of like the dynamic DNS services that give you your-custom-name.foo.example.com.
Are all these legacy features pure microcode? I'm sure they mostly are exactly that, but I would not be surprised if some of the hardwired circuitry's behaviour is influenced by mode bits for legacy features. It seems conceivable that a hardwired circuit could have a flaw which caused it to malfunction when it gets some "legacy mode enabled" signal but otherwise work correctly.

You may well be right, that a die being damaged in exactly that way, is rare enough, that the additional yield from being able to use such dies is rather marginal. But I think it would be hard for anyone to know for sure without non-public info.

> Fundamentally changing the instruction format might save a little bit of space, but then it wouldn't be compatible with x86-64 anymore either.

I wasn't talking about that. A CPU which didn't support real mode, 16-bit segments, etc, would still have the same instruction format, so instruction decode would be largely unchanged.

I wonder if we'll ever see a CPU which supports executing both x86 and ARM code, through separate instruction decoders but with a shared execution engine. Of course, there are lots of differences between the two architectures beyond just the instruction decoding, yet in some ways those differences are shrinking (when you look at features like Apple Silicon TSO mode, and Windows 11 ARM64EC architecture).
Congratulations on your bargain $12 domain... although you'll be faced with the difficult decision of paying google $850 next year after you've invested in the name building up a site and a reputation on that domain.
Except when there's multiple of these as you follow the signs, it ends up just leading you in circles.
Speed difference is also an issue. Speed certainly kills.

Increased speed limits in BC increased fatalities:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/fatal-crashe...

Road Safety Impact of Increased Rural Highway Speed Limits in British
Columbia, Canada
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3555/htm
sustainability-10-03555-v2.pdf

https://icsw.nhtsa.gov/nhtsa/fars/speeding_data_visualizatio...
27% of fatalities were speeding-related

“There is a great deal of evidence that if you drive just two percent
faster, your risk of being killed increases by 10 percent,”
https://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/23/speeding-health-hazards/

Moreover, traffic flow is worse at higher speeds, and there's more pollution, and it's louder. And we have to spend more money on roads.

If one were to want to drive fast, the best place would be a race track.
Ask HN: Text-DaVinci-003/ChatGPT made up research sources?
I'm using text-davinci-003 to find some research backed findings to build up my startup pitch. However, when I ask for the research source (title and url) for AI's answer, the report title and urls given by AI are usually not accessible or searchable online.
https://beta.openai.com/playground/p/default-chat

Overtime, I started suspecting, are those reports and url fake/generated by AI?

Examples of the reports referred by AI:
4. Mental Health Foundation (2015). Why do some people not get the help they need? [https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/publications/why-do-some-people-not-get-help-they-need](https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/publications/why-do-some-people-not-get-help-they-need)
5. National Alliance on Mental Illness (2020). Mental health conditions & stigmas. [https://www.nami.org/About-Mental-Illness/Mental-Health-Conditions](https://www.nami.org/About-Mental-Illness/Mental-Health-Conditions)
6. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2019). Mental health services in the United States. [https://www.samhsa.gov/find-help/national-helpline](https://www.samhsa.gov/find-help/national-helpline)
- National Institutes of Health (NIH):"The Huppert's Mental Health Spectrum: Population Distributions and Associated Factors".
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31407549/.
If you send me the domain name in question privately (use my HN username here @gmail.com), I can dig into it further. I suspect it's either an issue with the domain name registrar, in which case you should try out some others, or it's a case where the name is reserved and is not available for registration by anyone. If it is reserved I can find that out very easily. Note that it would not have been reserved as a result of a domain name search; it would have been reserved years ago, and perhaps the registrar you attempted to use didn't handle it well.

EDIT: The user reached out to me privately and the domain name in question is indeed reserved (because it is a Google trademark), and has never been available for registration. Looks like the registrar did not correctly display it as unavailable for registration.
The time to scan with ncdu on directory with massive number of directories and files can be long and you don't get progressive stats.

I made jsdu to get progressive (and recursive) size.

I mostly only use jsdu on a few top levels directories, and use ncdu for the rest or after the stats is cached by jsdu.

You can install jsdu with "sudo npm i -g jsdu" or run it without install with "npx jsdu"
Nope. Customers choose what kinds of pursuits receive monetary compensation.

You have something you want to do (and get paid for) that investors won't pay you to do? Can you get customers to pay for it? Then just go do it. Nobody's stopping you.
They didn’t claim it was illegal? It makes it less economical for someone to hold a domain they aren’t planning to use for 20 years. The squatting just gets more expensive.

Yes it’s a common business practice. Doesn’t mean google has to encourage that industry.
You still can just write your userscript as an extension. I just checked - it works. I inserted script into HN and did some stuff.
How much would people pay to not be underwater? That's a measure on how bad it is to be underwater. Just because you're not forced to sell and 'crystalize' your losses doesn't mean they're not real.
I own several non-premium .dev domains with namecheap, and with namecheap they're $16.98 per year to add new years.
https://www.pioneerfund.vc/ ??? !!

( A fund of 300+ Y Combinator alumni investing in the top companies of YC and our Venture Partner network. )

Interesting coincidence, but I'm guessing you were referring to

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_Fund

> an American non-profit foundation established in 1937 "to advance the scientific study of heredity and human differences".

> The organization has been described as racist and white supremacist in nature.

> One of its first projects was to fund the distribution in US churches and schools of Erbkrank, a Nazi propaganda film about eugenics.
ChatGPT Don't Have Creativity
I think any machine learning model cannot archive the creativity.

Simply they build a probabilistic model and verify it with previous data.

When we asked a question ML model come to the nearest probabilistic answer and give it to us.

Think about how we creative. When you come up with a problem without answer then you start to think about alternative heuristic solutions then you come up with create answer.
They lost several k$/sec yesterday with the ads downtime and are now trying to make the losses back.
Regenerative braking will reduce brake pad wear since part of the power otherwise dissipated as braking friction between pad and disc/drum is captured by the motor/generator, converted to electrical power and stored.

Tire wear should be unaffected provided the e-car has a "freewheeling" feature whereby braking is not applied unless the driver hits a brake pedal. If the e-car is set to always run in a regenerative braking mode (brake goes on if driver eases off the "gas" pedal) then the braking will actually increase tire wear.
> It adds complexity to a narrow use case.

It also simplifies the unnecessary complexity in many cases, and I have witnessed both. Just like one should not use an expensive Zeiss microscope to hammer nails into a concrete wall as a hammer substitute, one perhaps ought not to stick a graph database everywhere where it does not belong. Engineering (including software) is about selecting the appropriate tooling for each job.

> If it wouldn't be narrow neo4j wouldn't need to lay off stuff.

I fail to see how the two are related. If a company struggles with the execution of their incumbent business model, perhaps it is not necessarily related to the product (may or may not be though)?
> It's a one man show and the only goal is to keep morale high among employees.

I guess Elon is doing it wrong
To be accurate, Pyret is a collaboration (primarily) with Joe Politz and Ben Lerner and they deserve most of the credit for it.
Sure, but irrellevant.

The point is that the design of the vehicle, or anything, needs to be as good as possible regardless of anything else, and there is no overriding excuse not to.

It's not like the poorly designed controls are necessary for some other even more important reason.

If both roads and drivers were all excellent, the vehicle still needs to be as excellent as possible. If all other factors are so good that only 10 people die each year from car accidents, there is still no excuse for making vehicles less safe and make that become 20.

Alcohol, lack of alcohol, good roads, bad roads, speed limits, none of that matters.
Imagine you're a 12th grade English teacher who has tried ChatGPT. Knowing how to produce coherent written work is a key outcome of your class. As this author wrote, many students can't do that on their own. They aren't going to get there by graduation.

So, should you spend a class period introducing ChatGPT and teaching prompts?

Obviously you'd prefer if every student was able to produce coherent written work on their own, but that's not reality. Enabling them to use another tool seems much better than nothing.
Regarding Yamaha and synthesizers I just wanted to mention that I consistently hear rave reviews of the Reface CS. I am more into vintage electric piano sounds than synths and currently own a Reface CP and the sounds on that are legit.
A few scratches aren't going to be a big deal. Not like they not going to get dirty and dinged up from the wind anyway.
That is not acceptable.
It’s the difference between a mass produced product and a hand made artisan one. Sure you can make the former look like the latter, but eventually you arrive at a boring world that has no uniqueness if you eliminate all human creativity. Mass production is a miracle that has enabled billions of people to enjoy everything from clothing to mobile phones, but humans crave variety and novelty almost on a biological level and without the artisans we’d run out of both quite quickly.
If you look at the book, you'll see that is not what it does, and for this reason.
I just love the concept of a “premium” database entry. Domain registries are such a goddamn rent seeking middleman scam.
At this point, even blockchain-based names command higher trust than Google.
See https://cs.brown.edu/courses/csci1730/2022/assignments.html
eGovernance blog
Disney+ now requiring birthdates and gender for all streaming profiles
I can't see how bird poo could be a problem here: there's no food, nesting site, nor high spot to hang out anywhere near it. Theft could be a problem, though I'd assume they'd have some sort of protection hidden on it.
Never thought about it, but can you sue from outside of the US ?

Feels to me like it would be a lost cause depending on where you are.
Unless demonstrated otherwise, this sort of "could" is indistinguishable from "couldn't".
That's a shame. I bet my startup's code with gorilla websockets will get use for another 2 years on the same git sha (it's been in prod for 3 years already too). So thank you for the work! It was a good library
I wonder, do you see this changing now that the strategy of growth-at-all-costs is, at least for now, receiving more scrutiny?
We recently moved to attribute based instance selection for our web traffic. It turns out that there's a ton of capacity in random instance classes at various times. Sometimes it's c6a.metal with 192 vCPU. Sometimes it's i3.metal with 64 vCPU.

We've been able to get the capacity we need much more readily with this configuration. (everything is spot btw)
This is the kind of thing a real estate agent will tell you before they suggest you raise your bid. The fact is that it does matter - you could have bought a better house with the difference, your monthly payments could have been lower, etc.
Suing lawyers as side income.
we all know most lawyers are scummy using all sorts of deceit to gain advantage.
However in the increasing documented world, it is a matter of digging(using text search) to find fault with the offending lawyer's deceit and then file a DIY action in court.

I am involved in estate litigation since 2016 where I discovered collusion by many lawyers with the estate administrator to defraud the estate. Our laws for anti corruption are stringent in my country where a lawyer causing a beneficiary damage as the estate's lawyer is liable for 20 yrs imprisonment and 5x penalty fine for the gratification received.
I dare you to try it and see. You might be surprised! Competition is healthy and we don’t personally feel like we have enough of it yet :)
Following your rules, in 2022, you're just left with made up words for .com domains.
A group chat including crypto leaders shows Binance’s Changpeng Zhao accusing FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried of orchestrating trades to destabilize the industry.
For what these are designed for its pretty easy.
You stated here that they paid $850 to initially register the domain name.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33929354

Do you have proof of the initial price paid for registration or is this in some part speculation?
E Governance blog
> thoroughly-debunked copypasta. In the post-WWII international order where lines on the map are generally respected to avoid war: Russia attacked, and continues to attack, a sovereign country. Period.

None of that has been debunked, it's quite literally factual events and treaties not honored that all parties admit weren't honored. None of those facts are in dispute by anyone.

Regardless, if you want to dive into the post-WWII international order, the right of self-determination also wasn't honored. The west aided in a coup in 2014, removing the elected leadership of Ukraine. After that, the western half of Ukraine voted to leave Ukraine. Only after 6-8 years of fighting between the Ukrainian parties did Russia become involved directly and a new vote (where they again voted to join Russia) did they in fact join Russia.

As with everything in life, it depends on perspective. I'm personally an avid pacifist. Taking a life is never justified, even in self-defense. I personally see both "sides" as acting poorly here.

That said, I can look at both arguments and obviously see Russia is acting in self-interest. Ukraine is acting in their interest. But only one side here has been having their homes shelled for 8 years (the Donbass).
i swear those buggers sense where the volts are
Equating a poll about the prosecution & persecution of two historically important figures who exposed serious criminal misconduct by the US state (one a non-US journalist, the other a US American whistleblower) with a completely subjective and yes, clickbaity question such as "Are cats better than dogs?" is highly disingenuous. One is a matter for serious legal, ethical and political debate; the other quite clearly not.
I'll second the quality of his videos. I'm usually not a fan of stuff like that, because they tend to be not very precise, but he knows his stuff, and is able to compress it in a very short amount of time. Part of it is infotainement, but it's probably the best I've seen.
Due to topography, Autobahn roads can still be very curvy. The Albaufstieg [0] is an extreme example but not the only one. Notice the sign at 3:04, it's limited to 60 kmh. Weather can make those curves even more dangerous, e.g. rain or ice. As for objects, they still occur. One example is prior accidents. Another example is the end of a traffic jam. These are an especially bad problem for trucks [1], that actually drive way slower than 130 kmh even. The problem here is driver attention, but too fast speed can also contribute [2].

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBbAvzXhwNQ

[1]: https://autofahrerseite.eu/sicherheit/524-lkw-unfall-stauend...

[2]: https://bz-ticket.de/massenkarambolage-auf-der-a5-kettenreak...