skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s kind of nice for laughs. Maybe there needs to be a new button “[] suspiciously AI” we could click it under suspicion and see how the stats resolve.
> When there is a lack of love in childhood, it typically predisposes a child to not understanding what love is. Instead, children raised without feeling a sense of love may become adults who confuse sex as intimacy, codependency as love, or abuse as connection. A lack of love in childhood can place an adult at an increased risk for mental health issues including major depression, substance abuse, low self-worth, or compulsive behaviors toward love [1].

[1] https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/understanding-ptsd/2...
For somebody who dislikes frameworks in general, this one looks great.
But it seems like the attention mechanism fundamentally isn't markov-like in that at a given position it can pool information from all other positions. So as in the simplest case when trained on masked-language modeling, the prediction of the mask in "Capital of [MASK] is Paris" can depend bidirectionally on all surrounding context. While I guess it's true that in the case where the mask is at the end (for next-token completion), you could consider this as a markov model with each state being the max attention window (2048 tokens I think?), but that's like saying all real-world computers are FSMs: it's technically true, but this isn't the best model to use for actually understanding its behavior.

Since for most inputs that are smaller than the max token length you never actually end up using the markov-ness, calling it a markov model seems like it's just in a way saying it's a function that provides a probability distribution for the next token given the previous tokens. Which just pushes the question back onto how that function is defined.
Wargames.

Event Horizon - not quite AI, bit a great representation of what's promised by the technology and what's actually delivered.
It did, do you think it went from a rural imperial backwater to... A second-rate industrialized economy in the span of a generation by accident?

(Despite being ravaged by five years of civil war, and then four years of a world war.)

A lot of awful things were done in that time period (and the one that followed), but you have to be blind to not call much of it nation-building.
The consistency is why I’m playing with light mode again. I’d stick with dark mode if all websites respected it. But many don’t— including HN! I’m tired of having random, blinding moments throughout the day.
Good question, I ask myself the same thing every time I come to this site :)

I'm also a programmer in my spare time, I started coding long before I was a pilot. Sometimes I do consulting work and I also have a startup. Flying jobs generally give enough spare time to do these things in a limited way.
So far in unbiased real world tests the efficiency gains have been fairly limited,and. It enough to offset the increased costs. Note that I mention unbiased tests. There are some manufacturer tests comparing a boat with essentially a wrong prop to the Sharrow, and showing impressive results.
How is this better than bootstrap?
Really glad this got out & will with hope be the end of year LTS release.

Some other favs:

power management fixes for AMD

big BTRFS perf boosts

ton of embedded controller/fan speed updates

faster retbleed mitigation

usb4 host-to-host improvements

lots of gpu + hid improvements
Sailor Moon, Inuyasha, Cardcaptor Sakura, and Full Metal Alchemist were all female authors — and animes you could watch on US tv.
This has historical precedent. Many plants were built in such time scales. About a quarter of them shut down early or destroyed themselves because they were so unreliable, the rest generated electricity less frequently and with more correlated outage than a wind turbine.

China is the only exception, but they still take 4-8x as long to build a nuclear plant compared to a wind farm, it's just that both take less time.
Epic already uses it, so I guess not too long: https://mobile.twitter.com/saji8k/status/1339709691564179464...
Somethings I like in this paper, 1) the AWK programmer tried to do as many statements as possible in an 80 column row (must have loved one liners in Perl), 2) the Lisp implementation just describes the guy being at the kickoff for 4 hours (doing what?).
Usually when you play the opening as Black you are responding to White's move which takes the initative out of your hands somewhat. There is such a thing as transposing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transposition_(chess), where you can reach the same position from different sequence of openings. So you can reach positions you are familiar with from a number of different openings.

As far as top players I think you need to be able to have variation in your repertoire if you play the same thing stubbornly you would risk becoming predicable and your opponent can prepare lines against you specifically. It might work for one tournament but afterwards people would have studied the games and developed counters.
Ask HN: How would you target businesses with this software service?
Say you've built an internal communication application like Gmail, Outlook, Microsoft Teams, Slack and Zoom.

With an app like that, how would one get their first few users?

With it being a crowded, well-established market, would pre-established businesses be willing to ditch what they already use for (what seems like) a small benefit? or if not how would you target newly-formed businesses which haven't made a choice yet? could you target within-business teams rather than whole businesses?

Would you choose advertising, content marketing, talking to people (where would you find people to talk to?), or something else?
Smoke is absolutely possible without a fire. Have you ever seared any meat on an electric stovetop? Overheated an empty frying pan?
You never used to need a lease to rent an apartment. Also, purchasing is a form of implied standard contract