skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That’s a good compromise, keep both names. And the kids if any can start with the last names of the same sex parent then choose one or the other when they become adult. It’s easy enough to retire these aged concepts. In a way the marriage contract is a technology to be advanced. Perhaps there’s an opportunity for a startup here, marriage 2.0. Trouble is people will see the contract as negotiable from then on. Custom marriage contacts would become the norm leading to new lifestyles, perhaps including communal partnerships, and further, women would have a great deal more leverage depending on which variant of the marriage contract they are willing to accept. Although it could be said their bargaining power would be restored rather than increased since it was clearly taken from them in the past using religious shame tactics.
Security and Privacy Advice
Nice that the tech industry finally finds out how the rest of the economy functions.
>Can the stage1 wasm binary be reproduced by the stage2 or stage3 executable?

Yes, per (2) in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33915480

>and every modern distro relies on some bootstrap binary for C compilers anyway (usually older versions of them), so it wouldn't be that much different of a bootstrapping problem than bootstrapping GCC itself.

Yes, that's exactly my point. The zig-wasm-bootstrap package could just be a Build-Depends of the zig package.
Bug bounty people (myself included, though mine's quite aged) have written scrapers on all the main popular CI/CD platforms, to automagically scrape tokens from logs & submit bug reports to get paid. Unsurprising if malicious actors have done the same.
These really are hidden gems. I’m glad some are getting a second chance on mobile devices. But it’s not the same as playing on a PC.

Especially with graphics million times faster than the devs could have imagined.
The real question is whether DeepMind can create a model which can outrun the goalposts.
> “Please explain how someone can be similar to a bovine in their relationship to crypto”

Oh, that's easy. When looking at the carbon footprint per unit calorie, bovine flesh, is much larger than vegetarian options. Same with water and land use as well. It's actually significantly worse for your health as well. There are practically no up sides to consuming beef, except the taste.

That's what it means when somebody is bullish on crypto: they want a currency that has little upside and is horrible for environment.
I'm in the same boat. This seems like an enormous amount of work to avoid archiving compiler binaries for a baseline architecture, and supporting cross-compilation.
YMNBALBYTLY: you may not be a lawyer but you’re thinking like one.

I want to again make clear that I think this kind of scanning sucks. I line the idea of a line. I like the idea of the line being that I decide which software functionality runs in my device. Your hypo about the militia is a great one. I would not live in a country like that, but I have an iPhone…
I could say this about most of the wise things I've read. But putting them in just the right words makes them ring anew, and can remind you that whichever one little fact has a disproportionate explanatory power.
Is this meant to contradict the OP? I count at least three falsehoods in this sentence alone.
I feel the same way towards SwiftUI, which seems to have an even more rockier upgrade path than Swift.
No, my current workplace isn't much like where I'd like to work eventually. But it's fine for now. I'll eventually work somewhere smaller and less corporate. Dropbox is much like Google by the sound of it. Probably better, and would be worse if acquired by an even larger company, but who knows.

But you're the one equating a bunch of stuff with toxicity, just keep in mind that that is not a universal equivalence, it's your opinion.

(Although for the record I don't _completely_ agree with the guy. Obviously work-life balance is a good thing. But much of the other stuff resonates.)
Investor desires congeal into a messy influence on the company. An investor pushing on the company helps direct that blob of influence a little bit.

It’s like when you’re annoyed about something local government is doing and you show up with 50 other people also annoyed. Now you’re part of a news story and a stakeholder faction. But you all got there because of your individual desires.

Also, the letter is a public artifact. The investor is also meeting formally and/or informally with Google or individual directors.
Yes, the DEA determines how much each provider can make per year. So when a company like Teva that is responsible for 30% of production fails to produce it for 2 months because they won’t pay their mail room workers enough, there is no slack in the system to make up for the lost production
Yes, there is a federal yearly quota of Schedule II ADHD drug product that each manufacturer is allotted. I don't know the exact process but can read more in detail at these links.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/1303.11
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/12/02/2022-26...
My local NPR station aired a story a few months ago about a local "NFT museum" that was 100% uncritical boosterism. IIRC, it featured a conversation with people affiliated with the NFT org (and nobody to provide counterpoints, and nobody with any significant amount of technical nous to point out the clear bullshit a la Moxie's thing[1]) that painted NFTs as the future of all art. The combination of the apparent veracity of the source with the absolute lack of nuance in the story was pretty striking; I think that was the only time in a lifetime of listening to public radio that I submitted a complaint about something I'd heard. It really felt like journalistic malpractice, although I guess I'm not sure how much blame to apportion to evil lying techbros vs. credulous underinformed journalists.

Anyway, a few days later I had to explain the whole situation to an artist friend who'd heard the story and wanted in. Argh.

---

[1] https://moxie.org/2022/01/07/web3-first-impressions.html
Agreed on the “it runs Doom”, but it could be great as a “run apps from the community” where it’s super easy to share and install code (community directory and an install script that can select them, for example).

Just ideas. This thing looks super cool and runs surprisingly well. Makes me want to see it do more...
Shame is you might actually get what you are asking for.

Edit: Morally why would someone be obligated to pay attention to the majority? Morality isn't up for mob rule.
what I'm interested in are the military-grade models they already have deployed against the russian and against the chinese. we're witnessing a war but cannot acknowledge it publicly.
They are aquatic so most of the fossils will be located under the oceans and seas. We can only find these ones because the area was once a shallow sea that has since drained due to the sea level falling.
I used to work at an HPC research institute. While I agree with your sentiment most statistical software has bugs that effect results.

The panda's bug tracker stressed me out on a daily basis. I've also found bugs that effected results due to missing instructions between processor architectures, erasure coding in wire protocols for storage systems, and even a kernel bug.

But by far the most common was by the author of the model themselves.

Software has bugs, no exceptions.
I think what you wrote is a reasonable position, but it t seems to me that there is least a portion of the population who is basically "infinitely hostile" in the sense that they have made it part of their identity to hate crypto and become zealots.

These are people that will boycott people and products remotely associated with crypto.

I don't think the author is trying to argue against the type of skeptic you describe. In fact, they seem to mostly agree.

In short I think you are misconstruing the argument.
And quite possibly ploughing into a crowd of pedestrians in the process.
These are all Lensa portraits where mangled remains of an artists sig is visible
The thing is, speaking for myself, every 5 years or so I’m almost a completely different person. Same context, different tenant. People change and they get bored. Maybe they don’t want to commit the entire rest of their lives to a single relationship. Divorce is the norm already, so let’s just standardize it and reduce the trauma.
From the article:

"If nothing’s wrong with your country’s financial or political system, then you don’t need crypto. If you use crypto anyway, it will be worse than your regular financial system, because it’s trading off many things you need (efficiency, speed, safety, the good kinds of regulation) for something you don’t need (avoiding the bad kinds of regulation)."
Their tokenizer seems very algorithmic and pre-determined. I suppose that is a typical burden of multi-class classifiers. It might be interesting to have a way of dynamically tokenizing words/sentences based on confidence about them. Some unknown words might need a letter-for-letter representation, while some commonly occurring phrases could almost be encoded in a single token. That'd probably require a completely different way of representing stuff and computing a loss as the representations would change throughout training as the confidence about some context changes.
Having unused variables or unused imports makes the code dirty and should be treated as errors. It's one of the (few) good things about Go.
Our 1948 house has asbestos cement shingle siding, which I imagine was the vinyl siding of its day back when.

We just leave it the hell alone and don't touch it unless we absolutely have to, and are happy with having a "mint green" house for now until eternity.

Admittedly it's done a good job of protecting the underlying wood siding, which would become its own expensive, ongoing, and laborious maintenance task.
> make yourself an opinion at this point

I suspect you mean, "at that point", talking about after "the coming months". If you do indeed mean today (at this point), then I'm actually curious why you think forming the opinion now isn't hasty.
Well I guess free energy motors do exist. lol

https://beta.sayhello.so/search?q=how+do+i+build+a+free+ener...
There's plenty of turtling for Terran and Protoss in SC2. Defense tech like cannons, planetarys, shield batteries, and bunkers help. It's definitely not fool proof but is classically something people struggle against.

I think a larger issue is that there's like 3-5 games to get ranked and then a bit more to get really ranked properly. And by SC2 design the early game is resource constrained so decisions are important and even with the right decisions execution is hard.
Ultrasonic humidifiers.[1]

1. https://dynomight.net/humidifiers/
12B in realized losses, as compared to 179B in unrealized volume.

Seems like an apples to oranges comparison there.
$12 billion sounds like a lot, but Madoff's ponzi scheme was $50 billion, and that's just one instance, not a whole market aggregate like the $12 billion.

Also, if you want to talk about fraud rate, you need a denominator. A big sounding number by itself is meaningless.
It still doesn't really work with "negvsvpvny vagryyvtrapr" :/

Edit: actually it does get the second word vagryyvtrapr->intelligence correct sometimes.
You could use agnostics vs atheists as an analog here. Most effectively atheist individuals are most likely technically agnostic because they are open to receive new information in order to have their opinions on the matter changed. A hard Atheist would make their decision based on no evidence at all, and I think you'll find most atheists are at least open to be effectively sold on deism if it came out incontrovertibly (still waiting).

All of this is the same with a crypto sceptic. I don't think you can assume crypto has to be a scam or more aptly a speculative investment scheme searching for a purpose. Some day, we could be convinced that crypto is super valuable for solving X, and the day it happens is the day I look to it with interest (still waiting).
This is clever. There's one thing that I do not understand:

Why the step 3 compiler has only the C backend enabled? In theory one could enable all the backends and skip to step 6? The step 5 comment says something about 'correct final logic', but I'm unsure what it means?
The main sass implementation is in dart https://github.com/sass/dart-sass, which I think is dumb because it's a fair amount slower than the old libsass written in C.

The reason they spouted was due to "Low developer resources" due to the difficulty of C, so they swapped to a language pretty much only used by Googlers. Google now has control of sass, which then gives them greater influence (even greater than just having browser majority) over CSS Spec choices (see CSS Nesting spec).
It certainly meets more of the middle class mazlovian hierarchy than not having money would, but it's still pretty short of self-actualization.
Just because it works doesn’t make it right.

Stealing cars is also more profitable that buying them legitimately.
Many games, yes (I do use them for platformers and the like), FPSes - hell no !

This is not just about gamepad console => m&k PC, by the way.
Write a story of husband spending more time talking to NLP models than to wife
the US is on another train, they don't have this problem because POTUS is not the real executive power... that changed for national security reasons probably since around september 2001, or before.. impossible to know.

moreover, the usa security apparatus designed south korea. they're a subsidiary country of the city of washington corporation (or something); i.e. they're on the same train already.

I must add that this is pure speculative guesswork, I ain't got no 'clearance'.
You have some pretty odd ideas. In particular I find it bizarre to frame a mutual, symmetrical commitment to monogamy as "owning a woman and telling them what to do". Marriage is nothing more or less than formal recognition of the human tendency to pair bond, and distaste for infidelity is neither a cultural quirk nor exclusive to men.
I think that in part it is defensive writing. Almost required behaviour on the modern internet if you want to have a reasonable discussion.
Related to this: I had fun the other night trying to explain rhymes to ChatGPT. It could ONLY write rhyming couplets, and even when I explained exactly which sentences in a poem I wanted to rhyme, it would write a couplet. (That even happened sometimes when I asked it specifically NOT to rhyme). Eventually I got it to manage ABAB rhymes by:
1. Asking it to generate four sentences on a topic with the same meter and number of syllables.
2. Asking it to come up with two rhyming words that relate to that topic.
3. Asking it to replace the first sentence with a new sentence where the last word is the first of the two rhyming words, and similarly with the other sentence.
4/5. Same as 2/3, but for the other sentences.
6. Asking it to follow all those steps again, explaining each one as it goes along.

The funny thing was that it kept trying to skip steps or simplify what it was doing. It also got completely confused when I asked it to extrapolate the pattern to new rhyme schemes, eg ABA BCB.
Maybe don’t judge random strangers? I sometimes wear a mask outdoors to keep warm, or to keep my hands free when I need to enter a store later. I’ve already had some assholes yell at me because of it a few times — and this is in California.
Yep that's right. I've seen some pretty spectacular runaways with our big trucks on site, usually you just get on the phone to CAT and order a new engine lol
It is only a limitation of the interface that we're interacting with. There is no reason it couldn't backpropagate towards a better solution when told that it's wrong. OpenAI probably aren't letting it train online lest some jokers try to teach it racism and other bullshit etc.
They're saying the lack of GC is an advantage over golang, not that it's a deficiency.

Or if you're suggesting a GC to solve the memory unsafety, a GC only solves leaks and doesn't do anything for use-after-free or simultaneous unexpected mutations.
Zig originally used the same strategy as the D compiler - not freeing memory until process exit

wait ... what!?

impractical in C/C++ because of language footguns

C and C++ are now very different languages. You might as well say objective-c/swift
It's worth highlighting that there is an "absence of evidence" of discrimination the other way except in Germany and the US. I think a lot of people are skipping over the fact that in the US the contempt goes both ways, overlapping to a significant degree with discriminatory attitudes or behaviors tied to factors other than vaccine status. Those who are quick to discriminate in very tangible ways themselves don't get to cry victim the one time they're the one on the receiving end of an unfriendly look.
Compensation for FOSS engineers is so broken. So much economic value gets created and rarely any of it is captured by the creators. It’s infuriating.
Areto Labs is looking for a natural leader who wants to use their tech skills to get rid of racist, sexist, homophobic and transphobic comments on social media, and make the online world more inclusive. We're looking for someone who wants to impact the tech vision, and get down and dirty with the entire product dev lifecycle including development, testing, deployment and maintenance of our front and backend systems. Fully remote, awesome team, tech for good - tell your friends! Apply here
Crypto is #3 on the greatest innovations in the ransomware space behind computers and the internet.
I'm aware and have been doing so. No idea why you're being (apparently) downvoted, what you're saying is factually correct, to include the politicians involved.

I'm quite upset that we've really ignored the research on blue emissions in white LEDs, because various studies have demonstrated exactly the effect I'm talking about - reduced sleep quality in homes with incandescent lights.
Help me understand the selling point of Wasp versus Next. The Wasp homepage says:

> How is Wasp different from Next.js / Nuxt.js / Gatsby?

> TL;DR - These are frontend-first frameworks, with some limited backend capabilities.

> [...]

> Although some of them now offer an option to use serverless functions, you still have to bring your own database and you'll also need some kind of a server/backend if you'll need to run more complex operations.

That's a big understatement; Next is fully full stack. You get API endpoints and server-side rendering out of the box.

You can deploy the backend as serverless functions, yes, but you can also deploy it as a plain old Node app.

Does Wasp offer something on the backend that Next doesn't?

> you still have to bring your own database

Confused on this one - does Wasp abstract away the database? The docs show a database connection config and mention using Prisma as the ORM. It looks similar to what I'd do in Next.
Milestones over Numbers
founder friendly != employee friendly
So is asbestos. It's wonderfully useful in a huge range of ways. Just rather violently human toxic when broken down. Much like plastics.
Well you just sound delightful and open-minded about your neighbors I wonder why they don't value your opinion about it!
Gee wiz, I’ve lived in a tiny rural town in AZ, moderate sized city in Northern AZ, Palo Alto, Manhattan, Brooklyn, Seattle, Raleigh, and a small town outside of Albany.

Yes, the fact that your nearby city is the worst of both worlds is my point. This is a condemnation of the way we build cities. Note that you are still near a city due to the amenities and opportunities that only cities can provide. This effect appears only to get stronger, not weaker, with time. So how can we not condemn later generations to abysmal living conditions?

It doesn’t look like either of the options on the menu in the US today.
The difference is Oracle vs. No Oracle.
Enhance already!
Even if you only look at stablecoin volume, it is significant. 110B over the last 7 days:

https://dune.com/hagaetc/stablecoins

I guess you could argue the billions in daily transfers are wash trading, unless the transfer is part of an exploit, and then it’s not wash trading?
This indicates it equally unreliable at a broad range of tasks. Applying it in self driving, life insurance, etc. will produce terrible outcomes.
Lot of human work is just "variations on common templates".
Yeah, that's what bothers me about it. It's not a stable solution. While taking the father's surname is sexist, at least it actually works. Hyphenation doesn't over multiple generations, at least not without more rules about what last name kids inherit. Expecting the kids to choose a last name when they're 'of age'... that'll cause all sorts of issues for them. It's selfishness on the parents' part.

Giving them the mom's last name may also be sexist, but that's still more practical than hyphenation. (Actually I don't think either is particularly sexist, it's just that it's far more practical to pick one of the parent's surnames for the whole family, and so one of the parents is going to get privileged to some degree.)
Are you referring to FastISel? We use that in Zig but our time spent compiling is still 77% waiting for LLVM to emit an object file.
I'm guessing it's a preference setting at this point, Waze was acquired long ago and they should have the same information to pick a route.

Waze seems more willing to save time even if the path gets more complicated. Maps on the other hand even exposes a "greener" path that minimizes fuel when it won't cost too much time.
This is an unfalsifiable claim.
Excited to see what you do next Patrick. Best wishes for impact and meaning.
"Bullish" is a terrible word to describe his position, for one thing. Scott doesn't claim crypto will appreciate in price, which is the standard meaning of the word. Nor does he make the weaker claim that crypto is net good for society. He merely claims that crypto is sometimes genuinely good, without saying much about how the pros compare to the cons. So all he is really saying is "I hate crypto less than some other people, who see literally zero redeeming qualities", and his title gets that point across fairly well.
That was the plan but unfortunately there was a company-wide travel freeze
$3B may definitely be reasonable depending on the numbers.

Just commenting on the apparent assumptions made using the analysis above. Zoom is still worth $20B, but there were many who said it was worth far higher because they didn't consider or discount competition at all.

However, I also think Zoom is likely to fall quite a bit more from here. Their revenue is flat YoY and still valued at 30 PE.
While talking about asbestos ... not enough people know they are are consuming food everyday that's classified by WHO as class 1 carcinogen (in the same group as asbestos and smoking), causing not only cancers of the stomach, bowels and prostate, but also contributing to other chronic illnesses like hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, copd ...

It's processed meat (bacon, ham, sausages, salami, corned beef, jerky, hot dogs, lunch meat, canned meat, chicken nuggets, and meat-based sauces) and (in the 2a category) red meat (beef, horse meat, mutton, venison, boar, hare, game).

https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/can...

https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/why-processed-meat-is-b...

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/1197F/production...