skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Oops! Hacker News folks are too kind. Just got rate-limited again, by the new API this time. I think 11k requests in less than hour was a bit too much. Working with them to increase the limit!
I can’t think of any company that fits that profile that I’ve come across PR from. Mind sharing a few names?
Did you read the article?

> In the three years since, disclosure of these price lists has been hit and miss. Some hospitals posted partial price lists, others none at all. (They were probably counting on not getting caught.) Two hospitals fined over $1M combined in 2021 for refusing to host these files (but since the penalty, have since taken a U-turn and published their prices.) This might have been to send a message to the other hospitals to get serious.
I can no longer edit it.

I would have edited it to say 1500 animals, striking "monkeys".
BART just adopted a major policy change to address excursion fare fee
> You can map these URIs, params and all, to static files behind the httpd. Nothing is forcing anyone into running a dynamic application.

Sorry, but this is a form of equivocation[1] at best. More honestly, it's a simple contradiction; at the point where you're "map[ping] these URIs, params and all, to static files", you are being forced into running such an application.

Although it's not a rigorous, well-defined term, it's widely understood what a "static" site is. It's the sort of thing you get with e.g. Neocities or GitHub Pages or one of its clones—where you cannot rely on being able to mess with the server configuration (past the point of specifying the hostname your site should respond to, if even that). Any more involved configuration moves it out of this realm and towards the dynamic systems that many people are not running and not interested in running—for various reasons, including pricing, maintenance, and sheer complexity/brittleness. A static site is a place where you dump a directory of files and the host doesn't do much beyond serving that file with the appropriate media type when someone requests it, which is pretty much the only thing that people can trust to work reliably if and when they move all their crud to another host and/or server configuration someday.

1. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/equivocation
> You're conflating two very different meanings for the word

The term you want is "equivocation." I don't think the gp is equivocating.

Also, "has use for society" is not a meaning of "value."

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/value
I mean, they also showcase a couple of robot vacuum cleaners. Is there a public SDK for the Roomba Combo j7+?
Because SBF was smart enough to donate less than 1% of the stolen money to the some important politicians.
Far beyond the value of TSMC, Taiwan is the lynchpin of the first island chain [1]. Taiwan remaining friendly to US interests is crucial to the integrity of the first island chain and thus the US island chain strategy[2]. In the event of conflict with China, control of the first island chain would allow the US to effectively interdict all maritime trade to China by denying access through the chokepoints created by the first island chain. This is frankly much more valuable to the US from a strategic perspective than TSMC (though TSMC is obviously very important).

You can also note the importance that Chinese planners place on this as well by looking at the Belt and Road Initiative, in particular the land-based projects that aim to connect China to European markets via rail [3][4].

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_island_chain

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_chain_strategy

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Eurasian_Land_Bridge

4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%E2%80%93Central_Asia%E2%...
> geopolitics is about more than Taiwan

That’s obvious and wasn’t stated otherwise.
> The at-home karaoke experience is pretty horrible

As long as you have a 0 latency Mic setup then just that and YouTube searching Karaoke versions with AdBlocker works beautifully.
Show HN: Deep Learning Fundamentals – A new, concise resource on learning DL&AI
You don't think the clients know it as well? There is a tacit collective grift practiced by both sides. Truly bullshit jobs. Coast and collect.
That is called a "Radioisotope thermoelectric generator" but it's not the magic bullet that it appears to be. Depending on the isotope, you either get a very tiny amount of power (far less than you'd get from a solar array), or a very short half life.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_ge...
I don't know what this has to do with my comment. I only said that the media and select politicians have been very soft in their questions and engagement with him. They have been considerably harsher with others in the tech and financial sphere who have done less.
You need a PhD from a top university for that. I am feeling hopeless before even getting a PhD. I don't even have the energy or resources for that. It takes an additional five years of hard work which could be invested in learning actual skills that scale. I feel like computer science doesn't scale like engineering. Therefore, I really need a good perspective on this.
> When one of the key uses cases will be to help the infirm and disabled?

If it ever works.
I'm surprised systemd hasn't solved this problem already.
Customization also makes your car much easier to identify. If another driver is annoyed by you on the road and later recognizes your chariot parked somewhere, a distinctive look will make it a lot easier for them to do you damage.
> It's also one of the most poisoned by history. It has, for instance, been used in eugenics movements and forced sterilizations in the US.

What a weird line of reasoning. So are rocket propulsion, gold, and English language.
> Like the parent post says, you make it work.

What does make it work mean? Most people I know will not accept the child “surviving” as making it work.
I thought he just meant access to thousands of oss packages that are easy to leverage, npm, nugget etc.
I feel like the implied question isn't of much value on its own. It's all about "where are you going with this?"

Leaving aside the connective tissue between creating value, creating market cap, how these translate to reward/money... What's left?

The subsequent discussion about dividing loot is one discussion. The discussion about making more unicorns might be totally unrelated. The latter is theoretically empirical, but in practice pretty speculative.

My take on these is usually about bottlenecks. A screw holding together a $100bn f35 is still usually cheap. Its importance doesn't determine price, because without scarcity it cannot be a limiting factor. A patent protected screw could, in theory, be priced to reflects value to the buyer/aircraft. A custom designed screw might also be expensive... perhaps reflecting the time value or negotiating power of it's custom maker.

In all cases the plane does not work without the screw.

If we're reviewing costs and such, the above thoughts on "value" might have value. They may even hold clues to cost efficiency more broadly. They may not be too relevant to a discussion about aviation mechanics.

I (respectfully) think pg's pov is too abstract, as is the proverbial opposing pov that he's responding too.

Look... Investors tend to think the bottleneck is "great founders," the modern version of investment opportunity. A lot of founders tend to think that it's investors. Perhaps the bottleneck is corporate and government procurement. Military people and other tribes tend to think the bottleneck is leaders. Economists think bottlenecks are institutional. All convenient viewpoints for the people who hold them.

I don't really understand how automation relates. Unless we're talking about founder-only companies... Why is this points in favour of founder contribution, relative to the (now fewer) employees? Maybe it means that capital's value has risen. Automation is "capital" technically. You might even claim that the public is responsible for more of the value, considering the importance of public domains to technology.
People lack imagination. Think of it - a Musk company with sleeping compartments. Employees with Neuralink connectivity working even when they sleep. The man is going to be a gigazillionaire.
I agree 100%. Also, I don't see a substantial difference in risk between a founder and an early employee at all. Founders typically have little invested in the startup other than their own time but they compensate for that by paying themselves a salary with investor money.
As I mentioned, that might not be a problem at all. If you can put it there once, you can probably take it out every week or two, charge it and replace it. Or replace the powerbank it is hooked up to.

Not all surveillance needs to be constant and long term. If you are curious what your wife does during lunchtime or what is your coworkers address it might be enough to get it running for couple of hours.
My great-great-grandfather too.
I want to see how well this does with Yellow Ledbetter
Why Arizona why not NY state
Or else it gets the hose again
Oil is significantly more valuable than water - the added cost per gallon of water would be astronomical.

1 oil barrel is 42 gallons and costs around $75 today. I pay about $6 per CCF of water which is 748 gallons. It might be worth doing this with oil, but even if you scaled it up, it would be hard not to have the transport cost more than the actual water.
Yes, that’s how Moore’s law has worked for 60 years: incremental advancements. The past 15 years have actually involved far more radical step changes than the 45 years prior.
But do they provide board views?
Show HN: Copilot Money launched their macOS app
> I would be curious to hear more justifications from him for this.

Not sure I understand you. Why do post-acquisition wealth need an justification at all?

> Founders really take far less risk than employees.

If it would be true, why aren't you a founder? You know, blaming other people for wealth/startup/marriage or government/party/boss/partner is easy. But when it comes to actual execution, most of these people come up blank.

You have worked for a startup. Well, you was aware of the risks. But I'm pretty sure the founder had more risks than you. I say this as someone who founded a company recently.
> Pushing users to upgrade devices is unethical and harmful. Apple does it all the time and they should be held accountable for that.

Huh. Long-time Apple user and my experience is they're really good about supporting older hardware, including when that hardware can't support the newest features. Usually (not always, but usually) if an older device doesn't get a feature, it's because it can't, but they keep getting updates anyway, just without the features they cannot support. That's the trade-off for more features being local-only or local-mostly rather than "cloud".
The cost of "lock-in" is often less than building a "cloud agnostic" product.

Trying to work around cloud vendor specific nuances can increase the risk of that component/feature failing. The increased risk and longer development time might not be acceptable to management.
No one.

But no one could fix a capacitor or resistor for less than it would cost to manufacture a new one. "fix a capacitor" even seems silly to say, because it is beyond the scope of the average person to fix. A similar analogy is a car engine, you can repair the engine, however mostly what a mechanic does is swap out pieces. Some things can be fixed with a welder, most (spark plugs, gaskets, belts, even parts like a carburetor) are just replaced.
This is similar for "technology" items. The parts may not be fixable but sub-components should be replaceable; the overall product should be repairable.
As someone that works with devices, you should know that 1500 monkeys is a wildly absurd claim.

As someone who also works with devices, I would be extremely skeptical and wouldn't even believe 1500 monkeys if the article did state it, unless proof was included.
Liz Truss, who brought in tax cuts for the highest earners based on this idea, and as a result lasted only 45 days as prime minister of the U.K.

See also: Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Regan.
No?

I personally would be fine working in such an environment, and accepting the risk if the pay was sufficiently high.

Many folks do some everyday all around the world.
Am I? I think from a selfish perspective, I am making a huge mistake. I have no doubt that having kids is a lot of fun, which I will miss, and also when I get old, I will miss someone keeping an eye on me. (Technically, you don't need your own kids for that but our society is, for better or worse, structured that way.) And I hope next generation will be very slightly better off (less resource contention) because of my choice.

Also, to clarify another thread which is no longer there, I am not anti-natalist, but "anatalist" - I believe in personal choice in this matter. I also don't think anatalism is hereditary, but acquired from intellectual reflection of the world.
There are a lot of exciting opportunities in the space industry for those looking for a field change.

Here is a site that aggregates jobs from major Space companies
https://rocketcrew.space/
Util(itsrianism) is truth(tilitarianism)

The categorical imperative deserves to stay in the dustbin of history.
Justbuild is a generic build system supporting multi-repository builds
> And in order to either maintain or upgrade, one needs to know both conventions.

No, not really. You only need to know the declarative, target-based modern cmake. Most of the ad-hoc nonsense done with legacy cmake is either features that since the 2.x days were added to cmake, or nonsense that should never have been written to start with.
Misleading title, funny enough the road outside my house is nothing more then compacted gravel that the intentionally leave the dust in... its called B2 modified I think. so as long as your moon buggies have reasonably wide tire to weight all you need to do is grind it to the right size and compact it. ... but the article itself is about much more then that and it will be interesting if 57M can actually build a solid structure from those materials. As others have said no water or anything so if it can be done without a big supply chain then I bet the "tech" will be to compress what's there into bricks of some sort. So they just reproduce the materials here and see how much they need to be compressed to make something usable.
Worse, I think they meant to say "It's only tested in Chromium based browsers, beware" and they should let you pass anyways.

I tried opening https://codux-demos.com/blueprint-css-webapp/ in Firefox but changed my User-Agent to Chrome on Windows. Everything works fine as far as I can tell. But all the network requests are slow as hell (probably HN-hug? Confirmed to be slow with cURL as well, so not because of Firefox).
It would be really cool if SmartyNames could suggest domain hacks too[1]

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_hack
And this is real-time (Like the apple sing). So it is a game changer for DJs (usability-wise)
I recently started using Taiga for small projects. I love it for what it is, which is a project management tool that is intuitive for a developer to use. It doesn't rely on timesheets, but on task progress, which I love. I don't care how much time people spend working on a project, I just want to see a picture of where the project is at.

When I first tested Taiga, I put my own personal schedule into it. With epics for things like Christmas, tasks for chores, going out for coffee with my mom, etc. It works amazingly well, so well that I still use this test project and prefer it to my regular schedule.
What framework are you basing this course on?
No not all work is equal. Progress is a rare thing. Do not equate all forms of work to progress. People will pay good money for women to fart on their faces. That's not valuable work. Neither is building shitty apps.
> Is there anywhere on earth where gas is cheaper than electricity?

This is a bit complicated, since the two are not directly equivalent.

But as an example example, we can compare a 30mpg car with an EV rated at .24kWh/mile (advertised consumption for a Tesla Model 3). 250 miles would be around 60kWh or 8.33 gallons. Power averages (in the US) around $0.20 per kWh right now, gas about $3.38 per gallon. There's a lot of variance by state for both of these, of course.

And so, for 250 miles, gas would be $28.16, whereas electricity would be $12.

So the answer to your question is: Probably. It's only around 2.5x difference in price, which could easily be inverted somewhere that has a significant oil supply but low power generation capability.
People can’t afford enough kids because there isn’t enough economic growth, because there’s not enough young people, the only solution is more people. Banning condoms - or banning premarital sex as Indonesia has done recently - are sort of the only ways out of this mess.

You’ll know I am right if you live long enough - another 30 to 40 years and it will be obvious to anyone how catastrophic low birth rates can be.
Nuclear has yet to kill 240,000 people as well. Fossil and biofuel normal-operation particulates kill a high-ball long-term Chernobyl worth of people every 8 hours.
After a recent hurricane decimated our area, a battery powered emergency AM radio was, for some time, the only source of information available. Communication resiliency shouldn't be decreased without good reason.
We can't and will never have a world with 8 billion distinct businesses that all have zero employees each. So it's nice that you think you might have a shot at a tiny lottery, but personally, I like to see trends that can benefit all of humanity, not just those who choose to start businesses.

Nothing against automation itself, but the idea that it means all of the value of a business can and should accrue to a single person I take issue with. It doesn't matter how evenly spread the probability that a randomly chosen person can become a successful founder is, or what my personal probability is. The total number of such people is necessarily capped at a very small number, and there is nothing to celebrate about at the idea of a future where only a very small number of people can ever enjoy the wealth created by automation.
One of the last times something like this came up I went and looked up the cheapest desk fan in an old Sears catalog. Maybe the ‘60s or so.

It was priced at like $15, about the same as today.

But if you did the math for inflation, it would cost like $120.

So of course they lasted forever. And they were made of metal and designed to be workhorses. They cost $120!

When you make a plastic desk fan for $15, even with razor thin profits for everyone involved there just isn’t much money left to put into lasting quality parts.
It's an open ended sandbox so there's no dedicated "you win" condition, but becoming a mountainhome is the narrative end goal.
Let's set aside the enormous debate that could be had around whether or not killing an animal "humanely" is ever actually possible, and instead assume it is for the sake of argument. Do you think that the person who originally stated that they want to consume animal products while also minimizing animal welfare is _actually_ going through the effort to ensure any animal product they consume was suffering-free? That means the milk powder in the crackers they had at lunch were _verified_ by the OP to have not involved any suffering on behalf of the cow who yielded the milk, or the calf who was born to consume that milk. Do you think that is what happening, and that the OP is _actually_ making sure they only meat from animals who grew up in a grassy field and were killed instantly with 0 pain?

I don't. And if you also think that seems unlikely, then I think you should agree with me instead that perhaps we can't really be claiming to value minimizing the suffering of animals while consuming their bodies.
The contract is more likely to test road building instead
As with all things of such a grand scale as this, it’s best to start at the bottom (local communities) and work up from there. Conservation efforts, cooperatives, grass roots politics, etc.
> Kong comes with its own RESTful Admin APIs. It is built on top of OpenResty (an extension of NGINX) and LuaJIT. These provide access to all kinds of configurations that can be made available. We have done another addition on top of it by adding the Konga dashboard to manage Kong via a GUI.

So, this is not a brand-new product, this is a fancy dashboard/configuration builder for OpenResty.

And it looks like the focus is on interactive service building, with configuration stored in database, seemingly without configuration review or change logging (I could not find those in manual at least). This seems like a dangerous practice for production systems which can easily lead to data loss or outages if someone mis-types some routes somewhere.

I found configuration-as-a-code systems to be much nicer than random dashboards, at least for production use. Yes, it is a bit harder to set up initially, but you never have to worry about "hey! why was it working yesterday and not today?".

(The manual does describe "db-less" deployment, but it seems like an afterthought and definitely not the main focus...)
pessimizer writes:
> Is this a friend of yours? Because you have more confidence in him than I have with people I know personally. Sounds parasocial.

If only! Given you've tied your identity to pessimism, which I assume implied you see it as a virtue, I think you might be somewhat more inclined to misanthropy than me. And that's ok. :)
The whole point is that you can sing with it, which implies it can capture your voice in some way, even if you aren't holding a microphone.
Subject to my own personal brand of morality, feel free to insert your own but...

"animals have been killed for food this year in the United States"

If you kill 10 animals for food it's not the end of the world.

If for every 10 you kill an additional 1 because of the horrors of factory farming, it's sad, but in the grand scheme of things, they still died for us to have food, they just didn't become food.

If you kill 1 animal just for kicks, you probably need to be institutionalized.

And if you pay people to maim 1,500 animals to meet unreasonable deadlines for a moonshot vanity project that's cutting corners while planning to implant its results in human brains, you need to be stopped.
They do something special: get the necessary sign offs from legal. Apple‘s license for some content may bar it from being used that way (that’s another reason for doing it on device: could be different situation as far legal & licensing are concerned)
It's a bit annoying to setup initially. Caffe is the default runner for Bottles and plays more games out of the box than any other runner I've tested. However I hate the Bottles interface so I downloaded the Caffe runner separately.

https://github.com/bottlesdevs/wine/releases/tag/caffe-7.20

Then you can drop that into the default folder in Lutris and choose it as the runner. Lutris also integrates with Steam so it'll see your entire steam library and you can choose a different wine runner and wine options on a per-game basis.
I've read various reports of Russians getting a hard time in Europe (woman slapped in face on the street while speaking russian on her phone). Reminded me that Russians escaping Russia are refugees too.
Ask HN: Did Serena Aunon-Chancellor Sabotage ISS?
I'm reading conflicting sources about whether she sabotaged ISS (International Space Station) or not. Does anyone have some information around what actually happened?
The real question is, which Karaoke app was recently rejected by app store reviewers for vague violations prior to this release?
FTX was one of their biggest customers. I think they both used the same bank too
There is no authority to enforce these laws so it doesn't take much will to break them.
> why not use humans?

Because killing humans to save mice would be a really stupid choice
Meta's business model declared illegal in the EU according to WSJ