skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You bought a android phone.
Google forces Samsung to put their Google crap on it and activate/ configure it a certain way before they certify the device firmware for Google play store download/access.

If you don't want it the only option is a non android os such as oxygen.
Make in India was hyped most in 2015-2016. It was always considered a failure. Recently government introduced PLI and DLI schemes which helped get some manufacturing rolling.
The object model of PowerShell is in my opinion really great for, at least, mitigating the text munging issue. The others are still there though.
> Some initial thoughts include pivoting to work on lower level stuff like OS.

I'd suggest the opposite, move up rather. What's difficult for a computer is what's been difficult for humans since the invention of programming, turning a humans "I have this problem" into a concrete program that solves that specific problem in a good way.

What's hard in writing software is not the writing of software but that the software solves the right problem in the right way. If you aim to do this, I don't think computers will be able to do a better job than humans for a long time.
Wow, you just provided a positive data point for the article.

You completely dismissed the idea that anyone pro-life or pro-2A might have any good faith reason for their beliefs.

Thanks for validating the premise of the original article.
Reddit tried to kill itself with the new ad optimized UI but saved itself by continuing to let users use the old UI.
Is "noone" a euphemism for Donald Trump (and his many followers and sycophants and white supremacist dinner guests)? That's the only way I can make sense out of your argument.

Donald Trump says he plans to pardon US Capitol attack participants if elected:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/sep/01/donald-trump...
Are all colors changing to Purple, or is it just Red or Green.

Maybe they should have done what was done years ago, install a bright white light behind a colored lense.
"Announcing new and improved logics service! Your logic is now equipped to give you not only consultive but directive service. If you want to do something and don't know-how to do it—ask your logic!"
No it's not. From a practical standpoint, I'm not even sure how that could work. You would have to require all browsers to be open source AGPL in order to load a web page served by it. By way of analogy it seems the equivalent of requiring the mouse and keyboard firmware to be licensed the same as the operating system.

A real life example is Instructure, which makes Canvas (which is agpl) but has other proprietary services that interact heavily with it. It's never been a problem

1: https://github.com/instructure/canvas-lms
What always strikes me about these expositions of x86 and its predecessors is how neutral the language is.

All these piled-on complications are, first and foremost, seriously wacky, and are not found in well-conceived designs as illustrated by ARM and 6502 that perform much better per unit die area than coeval Intel products.

The designers must have been congratulating themselves on how clever they were being, while painting themselves into corners that ultimately made performance worse than a simpler, more regular design could have been.

This gratuitous complexity spilled out into the ISA, imposing a tax on programmers and, later, compiler writers, that we are still paying today.
There is no “war” on general purpose computing. There is a clear realization that the vast majority of people cannot securely run and maintain an open computer.

Perhaps more importantly, they just don’t want to.

People want appliances like smartphones. That’s it.

The more computers there are the more dangerous bad actors becomes and the higher the cost of negligence. Botnets, DDOS attacks, etc. the only real way to combat these is at the source and that’s by taking away management of those devices from most users.
I've started asking it to write detailed tests for all of the functions it writes. If it doesn't have a test for {edge-case}, I ask it to rewrite the code to ensure that {edge-case} should work and it should be tested.

Once I trust the tests, I generally trust the code.
I think any competent lawyer would advise him to shut up and never give interviews. Particularly odd since his father is a law professor.
Fraunhofer Neural Network Encoder/Decoder (NNCodec)
Ruby on Rails https://rubyonrails.org/ seems to meet all of these requirements:

- ActiveRecord is wonderful for data schemas: https://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_migrations.html

- ActiveRecord form validations is excellent and defined only on the model

- Scaffolds automatically generate create/read/update/delete endpoints: https://guides.rubyonrails.org/v3.2/getting_started.html#get...

- Websocket-driven updates provided by Hotwire / Turbo Streams: https://turbo.hotwired.dev/handbook/introduction

- Authorization and Authentication by Devise: https://github.com/heartcombo/devise

HAML is wonderful as a templating language as well.
T3 stack: https://create.t3.gg/ https://github.com/t3-oss/create-t3-app

It's Next.js, Typescript, TailwindCSS, Prisma, NextAuth, tRPC.

> I know about Node.JS, Angular, React, Express

You already know just JS. Stick with JS framework, not these Rails suggestions. Next.js is by far the biggest JS framework (ChatGPT page? half the recent YC co's? Next.js), the rest are the niceties around it to get to a full solution.

> A central definition of data schemas. I don't want to define my schema or validation twice, once in the frontend and once in the backend.

T3 stack uses Prisma, a JS/TS "ORM". Your data schema will live in a .prisma file.

> Automatic generation of REST endpoints. I hate boilerplate code and don't want to reimplement Get/GetOne/Add/Update/Delete and Websocket for each data model. Even better would be a GraphQL interface.

Includes tRPC setup. Give the automated tRPC endpoints a whirl. It's not auto-gen get/delete/etc. (like Django/Rails models) on the server, but the endpoint you create on server very quickly will auto-gen the func call available on the frontend.

> Authorization and Authentication

Includes NextAuth.js setup
Yes, I had to press "Try Again" a few times but, in general, the amount of stuff you can generate is staggering. It's also quite fun to ask it to "invent a programming language in the style of Rust and APL" for example. There's so much potential here...
And yet that doesn't mean Google is regularly returning wrong answers like Chat got is.

Don't put out this intellectually lazy argument without considering the magnitude of error and user ability to mitigate it.
But the key isn't publicly leaked, right? It's just whoever is signing the malware that has it.
I cannot imagine a more authoritarian thing than a market that severely damages the world.

"Presumably if factories that don't employ children were better there should be no need for a law."
I assumed the ChatGPT3 enhancement is that they added memory of the dialogue to it? That's a huge improvement over one off questions and answers. You can tell it to correct its answers and ask follow up questions.
Ironically this read me is absolutely riddled with spelling errors.
>Ask ChatGPT to solve unsolved mathematical and computer science problems

or alternatively just ask it to solve simple addition. It can't reliably add large numbers together either. As good as it is at producing plausibly sounding language it has virtually no facilities to reason or learn axiomatic rules.
There are two ways forward for testing candidates' skills:

- offline testing

- asking candidates to create ridiculous and hardcore apps that even ChatGPT is not sufficient. For example, creating a web browser with Rust.
I tried to get ChatGPT to write a regex matching some samples, but it can only capture a simple pattern, it couldn't write a regex with multiple alternatives to cover all the samples. Has anyone been successful in this? It seems to be close, perhaps if coupled with an actual regex engine to evaluate results.
Wow I did not know this exists.
I assumed it was intentional to show that it wasn't generated by AI.
Sure, I agree there - but the point is it cannot understand code. It can try to describe it, but it isn't able to reason about the code. You won't be able to coax it to the correct answer.
Yup, I swept 3 ( only 2 are current) Michelin star ramen shops in a week. I was not able to visit Tsuta because founder passed away recently and the shop is closed indefinitely.

Nakiryu is good, especially for the price, but I wouldn’t wait more than an hour for ramen. Fortunately I went when the border was closed. Nakiryu is novel because it is spicy, and it’s unique/rare for Japan, but the rest of Asia has spicy Chinese noodles (ironic cause Ramen is spelled in Katakana and literally means noodle in Chinese).

Not sure which nabe / chicken you had in Shinjuku. Sounds good, I’m interested. Are you sure it wasn’t a izakaya? There’s way too many to know. If you want chicken wings, don’t forget to try the wings in Nagoya. Furaibo is one spot. Again, surprisingly flavorful and unique for Japan, but similar stuff exist throughout Asia.

> Will never eat at Coco Curry again though. Got food poisoning there once.

It happens. You probably paid for that extra spice.
All i can say is i told you so. Over and over and over again. But no one listened - worse I was actively mocked. These language models will be GAI and indeed to a larger and larger extent already are.
Users like yourself.

edit: I don't mean this as an insult. I wouldn't want people to read "most users" and assume they aren't in that group.
Once you figure out some of the tricks it's pretty easy to outwit the AI and win the game... so maybe the larger game here is to try and come up with the absolute dumbest trick that still works.
When, how and who measured the IQ of India's population? Where did you get this number from?
Degradation of optical materials in solid-state lighting systems
EVs kinda skipped this whole analog/robust/scrappy phase of ICE & just took the worst of non-repair friendly things like soldered NAND flash which will wear out. Non-user replaceable battery modules & completely touch based controls. Having options or atleast allowing for user/3rd party repairs, without which adoption will always be hindered
As of 3.10, the walrus operator is your friend if you really want to name to explain:

return cached_foobar := cache.get("foobar").data
Emacs etched on a custom ASIC.
I'm actually bordering on thinking that (though the idea of someone measuring how much code in their github repo has been written with copilot, and then estimating how much devs can be laid off, sounds unrealistic. "We need to reduce salaries by the end of Q4 to please investors" is much more likely.)

And they already don't explain layoffs with the real explanation ("we over-hired and over-paid, the economy is tanking because energy is going scares, and our investors asked to reduce salaries by the end of Q4 because it's the only thing they know how to ask.")

But we'll start to see less and less hiring, some departments closing, and positions asking for "N years conversing with adversarial NNs" rather than "X years programming in Y".
I wonder if ChatGPT will force Google's hand to open up their LaMDA 2 (3?) model to wider use.
The full text on sci-hub has this paper's definition of tolerance as something along the lines of "even evil people still have rights".
Finally, Synthwave everywhere!
If the candidate can get the work done, does it matter how?

Tools like this are going to become more and more ubiquitous, and I’m questioning myself whether it makes sense to avoid it almost entirely as I have been or to embrace using it to accomplish tasks.

Unfortunately (IMO) we are through the looking glass, as they say.
Something that took me years to learn
You should consider a replacement of your legal team.
I also enjoy the detective work, especially for performance issues. I find I don’t like actually addressing the problems once I solve the mystery, however…
One thing I have found helpful with my children is that they are introduced to things in an analog way. Board games before video games. CD players before Spotify. This will they have a tangible relation to something in a very limited way so that they understand just what they are doing. Then, later, once they have a good grasp of what “listening to music” is as an activity, they can use digital services.
I can relate. It ebbs and flows, but right now I'm content with devoting my weekends to working on my projects: also practicing music, organizing several terabytes of photos from the past decade, hobby robotics projects, making a dent in the tsudoku'd pile of books and films and media I've amassed.

I think often of our modes of consumption and creation. I've experienced enough of those shareable interests to know that those are pleasant in moderation - human beings as social creatures and such - but that I find them to be primarily consumptive in nature. Creation takes a lot of time - often alone, occasionally frustrating - but the delayed reward is (usually) worth it.
A slight pivot but worth mentioning, I've collected a number of "children's" books that (for me) are just as good - better? - for adults. For example:

- "What do you do with a problem?"
https://www.amazon.com/What-Do-You-Problem/dp/1943200009

- "What do you do with an idea?"
https://www.amazon.com/What-Do-You-Idea/dp/1938298071/

- "What do you do with a chance?"
https://www.amazon.com/What-Do-You-Chance/dp/1943200734/

- "I wish you more"
https://www.amazon.com/Encouragement-Gifts-Uplifting-Books-G...

Of course, there are others. These are just the ones that come to mind ATM.

I've given the "What do...?" books as gifts to plenty of adult and young adults. My point is, a book doesn't have to be 200+ pages to have an impact.
So why exactly can't they do an OS update with the new signing keys? OEMs put out OS updates all the time. Plus if they don't want to do that, they could update their individual apps to use the v3 signing schema. They've had 6 years to figure this out.
That's loads of bullshit. People don't really understand the 40 hours per week thing. You CAN work overtime, as long as you get overtime pay, and you should have 2 days off, if you work on those off days, you should get double pay. It is very common practice in factories, where you expect to work overtime to earn more money.

In office job it is very different, you hardly get compensation for overtime, but if you go to court you definitely can get the money. The real reason is that those jobs are best paid, a few times more than other people, so people typically only sue their companies after they are fired. Yes, sometimes people worry about not finding another job, so they will accept what's been forced on them.
POP CS - dismissed as "useless" here - was used by some viruses to allow them to relocate their own code in memory. They stopped working when it became #UD on 286 and above! https://malwiki.org/index.php?title=Alameda
A digital rights bill. No, you can't label that button "buy" and then turn around 6 months later and delete it from my account. No, you can't go out of business and just turn off the DRM servers without removing the restrictions. No, you can't just add DRM to physical crap so you can get a monopoly, etc. Yes, users have the right to format shift your crap. If you want them to rebuy to use on X device add something worthwhile.
So you agree it doesn't track users. At least we're on the same page there now.

Why not use a cookie? Because then they can't advertise that they don't use cookies. It's like how they put No-GMO label on food that doesn't even have GMO crop varieties. It's meaningless, but people are uneducated on the subject so it sells products.

You could use a cookie here, and you could do it completely legally without requiring consent. The laws don't care about cookies or other technical implementations, they care about tracking. So the reason to use this cache header instead of cookies is simply because people are uniformed on the subject and it sells better this way.
Was the post written for SEO? Maddening long for no reader benefit.
I'm pretty confused trying to connect all the reports online with my own experiences as well. From what I've tried, ChatGPT does not _understand_ code at all, and there are many inconsistencies in what it says. The "confidently giving a wrong answer" problem is very real, even if the answer might look very correct at first sight. This holds across all the topics I've tried.

When people say they implement complex tasks with ChatGPT, I have to assume that it's a highly iterative process and/or that they are doing part of the design/problem solving themselves because even for a simple task I could not rely only on the bot's reasoning. (Maybe it gets things right in one shot sometimes - but my sense is that "on average" that's not the case at all.)

All that said - the progress here is really impressive, and I'm still having a hard time wrapping my head around what this can mean for the future.
Big fan of Sanderson here.

Also love how fellow devs such as Andy Weir and Ernest Cline (Ready Player One) are coming up with great novels.
How would someone learn more about this language model? What is it called?
Connoting that negative effects occurred for the sufferer. The assertion here is that this connotation is inappropriate because the sufferer in this case benefited in the long term.
Saving children from being sterilized is actually a very good thing. It's one of the few things that conservative legislatures are getting right. They have, perhaps unintentionally, adopted some of the radical feminist position on this - to the benefit of women and children.

The rest of their legislative agenda, agreed, it's not so great.
To be fair, Hebrew does have an official regulatory institute in the (ironically named) Academy of the Hebrew language. But indeed 100% of modern Hebrew speakers will say "nekudotayim" and not "nekudatayim" and maybe eventually the academy will catch up with that and make it official (just like they somewhat recently did with socks :)).
How could it?

So assume there's a normal distribution of price possibilities at each purchase point. You're going to end up with the _sum_ of those distributions, not the correlation or combination of them.

Presumably the deviations of those are growing more larger over time, but the are still the same underlying distribution curve as they sum up. The mean will trend steadily upwards.

The resulting price will be a normal distribution with a deviation of somewhere around the midpoint, and a mean of somewhere around the midpoint.

Now, with the mean increasing over time, your expected return will be decreasing the longer you wait. But what about the risk:return?

Unless you have outside knowledge about risk growing or lessening over time, it will remain constant over the DCA period, which means the risk factor of your investment (the standard deviation of the resulting DCA price) will be at exactly the midpoint of your purchase series.

So your expected return will be slightly lower, and your risk profile will be substantially larger, than just buying immediately.

DCA: math does not check out, not even close, _if you have all the money upfront_.
Which is why I desperately want someone to build a board using a Yosys/nextpnr-supported FPGA and having loads of RAM. Half a gig is a typical maximum for such boards - with access to more generous amount of RAM building an entirely self-hosting RISC-V based computer becomes plausible.
OK it won't be fast, but it will be Free.
(Of course that might not help much if the wider internet - or particular critical services - starts to require remote attestation...)
Lots of people i think would happily accept a global authoritarian regime as long as it told the right stories about how it was Making The World Better For Everyone <3
I agree the efforts would not be immediately fruitful, but they will start soon. And it's going to be a Dilbert-level running gag for a while to have clueless managers ask "could we do this cheaper with GPT3 ?".

Then, at some point, the answer will be a resounding "Sure, we could do a cheaper and _crappier_ version with GPT3, but..." and then some people are out of work for a while.
I'm trying to figure out how long he worked at the lab. It seems like it was between 2014 and 2016.

But they also say he worked at "New York-based" EcoHealth -- and then later that that nonprofit "helped the Wuhan lab put together" some research.

Would the headline feel different if it read, "Covid was man-made virus, says scientist who worked briefly at Wuhan lab sometime between 2014 and 2016."
That was just a GPS (?) update. I have an S9 too, if you check the security patch level (Settings > About phone > Software information), it’s still at March 1, 2022 (and there aren’t any further updates scheduled).
Oxygen is still Android, though..? Your next concern should be what the CCP might be forcing them to add in eventually.
> iPhone made in China is no better than the cotton from Xinjiang.

I think if you'll ask the suppressed people of Xinjiang, you'll find that they disagree.

> It turns out that in spite of all values that Apple promotes, it actually cares about nothing but the profit

How is Apple responsible for the Chinese Zero-COVID policy, and the actions of the Chinese police?

Have you read Apple's extensive policies on Supply Chain standards and ethics?
https://www.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/

> Apple has utilized the cheap labor at a level where can never be possible in the civilized world,

I'll just post this here from https://www.semafor.com/article/11/30/2022/apples-chinese-dr...:

> China is also no longer cheap. Wages have skyrocketed, with the average factory worker making $6 per hour on average in 2020, up from less than a dollar in 2006. The average wage of a Chinese factory worker will very soon surpass the U.S. federal minimum wage. For comparison, the average rate for a Mexican factory worker has stayed stagnant at $2 per hour.
Keep in mind that "setting" is part of a prompt for a language model, also asking it to behave like an assistant: They're nudging it so it doesn't pretend that it can actually browse, but such setting might not actually exist.
I live in Iran and this is total BS. They did NOT abolish it.
Some things that do work:

> write a haiku about a toaster

> write a haiku, then criticize it

> pad thai recipe

> can you korrect the spleeing errors in this sntence?
If to "look" means to verify the existence of things in it and to skim the code for style etc without even running it, then yes.

Many people have these repos with a fork of some opensource project with like 2 commits in it, or something not parting too far from a template project. I am not saying this does not qualify - because those commits might be useful or insightful, or merely sufficient to solve a problem - but they are way too easy to fake.
Not an expert on late 19 century England but this is not the way the story goes:

... He was bemoaning himself
this morning because he could not get someone
to go halves with him in some nice rooms which
he had found, and which were too much for his
purse.”
“By Jove!” I cried, “if he really wants someone
to share the rooms and the expense, I am the very
man for him. I should prefer having a partner to
being alone.
I so wish this would be a viable thing, but it's not, especially right now. In a way, you can blame "STEM", right? So many people in here, someone would likely sell out.

Law/Policy/Liability and whatever other methods one can get skin in the game are the only answer. Harmful software has to be punished.
> Yes, users have the right to format shift your crap

Doesn't this require a change in copyright law? As far as I know, ripping a CD for personal use is still technically an unauthorized copy in the USA.
I was recently in Oahu, Hawaii for vacation a noticed quite a few maybe a dozen pay phones still free standing. Most were broken, defaced, and dilapidated, but it reminded me of another time. I found 1 pay phone that had a dial tone when I picked it up. Unfortunately I didn't have any change on me to make a teat call.