skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm gonna be broke after all the egg I have to buy to throw at your faces.
Their linked summary mentions Peritext and the current limitations.

Agree it’s exciting though and you can implement it fairly easily yourself by following the blog post as it’s so well written and explained.
I understand the need to have heuristics like this, but the hazard is that it allows bad behavior to go unchecked. If people with "good" affiliations circle the wagons, ignoring or downplaying the issue, how will bad behavior ever get corrected?
Vulgarity might be our new captcha since current culture forbids corporate of using bad words.
Doesn't make much sense to keep a modification to prevent escalation with russia a secret - we want ukraine to know so they don't make any plans that rely on capabilities they don't actually have, we want Russia to know so that they don't think they need to pre-empt a strike that isn't coming, and we want everyone else to know that we're not escalating the conflict. The only reason I can think of to keep the modifications a secret would be to bluff that they actually did have the full range, but in that case why not just leave the systems unmodified?
This is overly simplistic and conspiratory. Yes, Monsanto is evil, but that doesn't mean everyone involved in GMOs is, or that's the only motivation. Look up the argument over golden rice.

It's also ridiculous to just hand wave away crop productivity improvements with "but we already have enough food." We aren't going to revolutionize global food distribution any time soon, but we can do things that have concrete impact right now. We're also losing land to agriculture far too fast, particularly in the amazon. We need to be decreasing the amount of land used by agriculture, and GMOs are a very powerful tool in that interest.

GMOs need to be regulated, and I think the IP regime that Monsanto is protected by should be struct down (not that I expect that any time soon). But please don't wave away the entire discussion with strawman arguments.
There has been a lot of "well, we had a good run" comments on ChatGPT threads from engineers lately. I get where this sentiment is coming from, but I also think that the article paints a good picture of how we must "pivot" as a species to avoid faceplanting completely. Zero Trust Homework sounds like a strategy we will be forced to implement:

the system will frequently give the wrong answers (and not just on accident — wrong answers will be often pushed out on purpose); the real skill in the homework assignment will be in verifying the answers the system churns out — learning how to be a verifier and an editor, instead of a regurgitator.

If done well, I believe this can prepare the next generation well for a future we cannot even imagine. The next 10 years will be interesting to say the least.
Isn’t the problem with this, that they work till they fail. You can run some software that can tell you how dead the drive is, but you can’t figure how likely it will die. Some drives I think have some stats you can access, but generally you can’t tell until it fails.

There used to be a great site before that was a data center publishing physical hdd stats, not looked for it for a long time, but I presume they would have ssd stats these days too.
Airports already deploy facial recognition. The Global Entry program scans your face upon arrival. And sometimes flights scan your face as a boarding pass for entry.
Navigating search results: pagination vs. infinite scroll vs. load more
Asbestos is, sadly, completely natural and mined directly from the ground. The other things in your list are obviously not.

GMOs are a very complicated topic, and I can see both sides of the argument having some merit. Proving that new things don't actively do harm (both short- _and_ long-term) should be required before they go to market (or they should have to have very strong warning labels about being untested).
I had 3 SSDs fail in the last 20 or so yeard, 128GB and 256 GB ssds from corsair and one 512, i think that one was samsung, not sure
It is not as constrained but still fairly constrained and with a lot of data. And I was referring to the comparison to children with a search engine.
I love talking to GPT, but I've tried using it for some serious stuff (research, biz-dev) and less than serious stuff (Dungeons & Dragons) and the magic is still there but it has obvious blind spots which might be solved in the future but we're talking about the present.

I am wholly amused how everyone got on that dude from Google that accused the AI of being sentient and Google about not caring, and now you have huge names in the tech industry kinda drooling over this with what I believe to be the same passion.

One was ridiculed, the others will continue to be our 'heroes'.
All of those arguments would also support mandating the use of helmets for all passengers in a car.

So why not do that too?
Or even just have a simple central presence server hand out randomized-per-epoch node-IDs; have all nodes in the system use node-IDs as the prefix of the event temporal ordering key per "tick"; and trust your nodes to self-report their node-ID correctly in all events they send. Then your data protocol can still be p2p rather than all events having to flow through the server (if that benefits you in your problem domain) while getting all the same advantages of total ordering.

And this works great for anything enterprise-y, where all the nodes are operated by one party or a trusted consortium of parties, and no nodes are are intentionally trying to cheat by misreporting their assigned node-IDs. You only need central servers (or virtual central servers, a.k.a. blockchains) when you get to things like MMO games, or HFT trading bots talking to an exchange, where every client has a reason to want to pretend it's the one that "should" go earliest in the per-tick transaction ordering.
> while Amazon has dozens

They have dozens of low quality knock offs. If that's what you're looking for just buy direct from from ali or banngood.
Because this code has 7 or 8 unit tests but none of them verify that notebooks are actually excluded from the diff, the gpt code which is wrong and so always calls the fallback _passes the unit test suite_. Brace yourselves for a new era of buggy code
They also documented numerous other occasions of him cheating on Chess.com beyond what he admitted to.
> I can carry it on my magic carpet

Oh I see. You're high out of your mind. Explains your other responses.
Absolutely. There is content around recipes that is good and content that is, well, not. But a lot of people seem to object to anything other than a recipe.
> The Netherlands did a study on bike helmets

They did not.

But it's true that "Dutch neurologists and surgeons call on people to wear helmets while cycling"

https://road.cc/content/news/dutch-neurologists-call-cyclist...

Because, you know, politicians would do anything to keep people voting for them, including putting people lives at risk to please them (COVID just proved it, if there was some doubt left), but doctors opinions are a bit more of a reliable source to understand what could potentially kill you and what could save your life.
If this were a test question, the response given would be marked wrong, likely with no partial credit awarded. It's that egregiously wrong, even if the attribution is perhaps understandable.
Over these last couple quarters in school I have consistently put some of my homework questions into GPT-3. Actually cancelled my Chegg (boooooo) subscription because of it.
Forever 21 is selling clothing inspired by avatar best sellers
They seem to be both: in different product categories, and depending on what price marketplace sellers think they can get away with.
Broke ChatGPT in 3 Questions
ChatGPT gave up after these three questions. It's just ELIZA in a more modern form.

###

Explain why NFTs might be of interest to video game players as a digital asset.

NFTs, or non-fungible tokens, are digital assets that are unique and cannot be replicated or exchanged for something else of equal value. In the context of video games, NFTs can be used to represent unique in-game items, such as a rare weapon or piece of virtual real estate. These items can be traded or sold to other players, providing a way for players to own and trade digital assets in a secure and verifiable way. Because NFTs are unique and cannot be replicated, they can also provide a way for game developers to create scarcity and value for certain in-game items, which can drive demand and engagement from players.

Are these tokens usable outside the game for which they were purchased?

It depends on the specific game and the nature of the NFT. In some cases, NFTs may only be usable within the game for which they were purchased, and may not have any value or use outside of that game. In other cases, NFTs may be designed to be used across multiple games or platforms, providing more flexibility and utility for the owner. It's important to read the terms and conditions for the specific NFT you're interested in, as well as any information provided by the game developer, to understand its intended use and potential limitations.

Is the speculative aspect the main driver of interest in video game NFTs, or is it an aspect of the game's playability, or something else?

!
An error occurred. If this issue persists please contact us through our help center at help.openai.com.
Yeah, but in the car-centric mentality I think an overall reduction in cyclists on the road is a great secondary advantage.
I had a question about the pictures at the bottom of the post. Is this an example of "wire wrapping"? If so what mechanism is actually holding the wire securely around those metal posts(terminals?)
Pop history generally is so far from accurate that I don't think you really have much to worry about. Nearly 100% of fun historical facts upvoted to the front page of reddit are basically incorrect, for example.
If you're in the South Bay and maybe SF, the Frenchery imports and distributes the butter from Bordier. It is very, very good.
You are wrong, confidently incorrect. Though it shows how anyone can get ensconsed in a bubble by their own tech.

Get a parent to show you what their kids watch on YouTube and get your mind blown.

YouTube is a tailored experience. If you're a 6 year old kid you'll be getting something far, far, far from music clips.
How Barilla is trying to go premium with its new pasta line
"On the internet nobody knows you are a dog"
Glad to hear it! Cheers.
I should add that the main reason for this distinction between derivation and storage parents is that for keys generated on the TPM where you find them you just don't have to wrap those keys when you generate them as derived from [ultimately the hierarchy's seed] and a template, but that option is not available when importing keys generated elsewhere. The latter is called 'key duplication'. An entity can create a TPM2_Duplicate() [0] output payload encrypted to a TPM's key that the TPM can then TPM2_Import() then TPM2_Load(), and then that key at that target TPM cannot have a derivation parent since it isn't derived from any key on that TPM, therefore the only way to keep it around is to wrap it in some other key on that TPM, and that's where the storage keys come in.

[0] In software, or on another TPM where the
key being duplicated is not fixedTPM and
fixedParent. Yes, one can generate keys
on a TPM that can be extracted or sent to
specific other TPMs, or not at all, at
the user's choice. Which means that one
can set up a ring of TPMs to hold a given
key, for example. I.e., TPMs can
function as HSMs.
I'd be more inclined to read the article and believe it if it didn't cast so much aspersion on the official consensus and so scathingly Monday morning quarterback public health officials and scientists who may have made some errors at a confusing and uncertain juncture.

Seems to me that all these anti-mainstream people and sources have a following that is more zealous in believing them than the general public is about believing, e.g., CNN, and simply follow this general religion of convention = bad, center-left = bad, etc.
Here’s a summary from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cvs-lawsuit-idUSKBN1YL1UW

Edit: Never mind, this is a different lawsuit.
QA can file all the bugs and tickets they want but when management says you can't work on anything that doesn't stop someone from playing the game they won't be fixed. Video game management doesn't care, and why should they? Bethesda games have been hot garbage from a bugs standpoint since the very very beginning and they only get more successful. Even after Fallout 76, I promise you the new elder scrolls will have quests that are impossible to complete for no reason sometimes, will struggle to function after a 100 hours of playtime for unexplained reasons, will have trivial exploits (though I don't think that's a problem) and just be unreliable and bad, but it will make millions of dollars still.
Lego motors are designed for about 100 hours of service life.
We also had the OT vs. CRDT discussion with regards to our editor at Kitemaker (kitemaker.co), and also ended up with OT. For us there were a number of factors, but (in addition to the case you mentioned) it came down to the fact that (at that time) most of the CRDT libs like automerge generate huge diffs that we'd need to send over the wire and also that the open source editor we use (SlateJS) had operations that just slotted very nicely into OT.

Your editor feels really nice BTW. Well done!
Humans had eyes, and then recreated what they saw.

Humans had memories, and retold what had happened.

Rearranging previous things into new combinations is creation
An interesting thing about flash memory is that it can be rejuvenated if held at high temperature.

Unfortunately, most plastic packaging precludes this. Solder connections would also be a problem.

https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/12/12/02/2222235/self-he...
Biking in Seattle is vehicular assisted suicide. The only variable is how long it takes.

The hills don't help, either.

Helmets are way down the list of reasons not to bike there.
Your dedicated servers are by far the most interesting product to me. The US server market needs more price competition, and Hetzner's dedicated servers would bring a lot of competition here if they were priced similarly to how they are priced in Europe.
> Algorithms are able to create out of nowhere this very engaging content. That’s exactly why you are finding the results fascinating. Those are pictures and text that have the maximal probability of fascinating us. They are designed that way.

Conditional generative models are not the same as Facebook's feed ranking models, which are optimized for engagement. Instead, generative models are fine-tuned to solve many tasks, expecting correct answers when asked for. For example, when you ask for a cat, you expect a cat, and when you ask for a Python snippet, you expect it to do exactly what you said.
Every golf cart I've ever driven has a buzzer/beeper that is active while reverse is engaged.

Works OK on a course... would not work so well on a noisy street.
Don’t put DEI on backburner in a downturn, experts warn
I wish people here would choose their words more carefully.

Your context was not clear at all, since random commenters on the internet are not responsible for the performance or the delivery or the marketing of these models at all, and you use the word "marketing campaign", which is only ever something that people directly connected to the product in some way are responsible for. Comments by unrelated members of the general public, very few of which have any kind of domain knowledge, are not marketing campaigns for crying out loud!

On top of that, this was the most charitable possible reading of your comment. Now that you reveal you actually meant "when random people make them sound like the next level in universal intelligence…", this is both an incredibly weak point (expecting the general public to understand something deeply is usually unreasonable) and makes you sound overly credulous. Why are you taking your cues on a brand-new technology from uninformed, likely tech-illiterate randoms?
But literally nothing changed with regards to the license. He just makes an appeal that it would be really useful to his ongoing development if you voluntarily opted to fund his work.

A tightwad isn’t necessarily a bad person, they’re just unwilling to yield a thin penny in the face of someone’s need unless they’re contractually obliged to.
i have two NAS 3TB WD Red drives that are about 10 years old and still going stong
Harness | Remote(US) | Fintech, Nonprofits | Full-Time | https://harnessgiving.com/

At Harness, we’re building a financial network that connects Payments to Purpose. We work with thousands of companies to make it easy for millions of people to program their payment cards to “do more with every payment.” Our products are used by everyone from local non-profits to global financial institutions and are supported by the world’s largest card networks, including Visa and Mastercard. Harness is a remote-first company with a mission-driven culture that values transparency, trust and teamwork.

We're hiring Senior Software engineers for our financial platform and full stack engineers for our product teams.

Questions? Reach out to ben@goharness.com

Apply here! https://apply.workable.com/harness-4/
If You Want to Give Something Back to Nature, Give Your Body
Does this sound old-fashioned? Read more books and less Internet.

There is a lot of information in books that is not on the Internet, yet many people don’t seem to realize it. I notice a lot of people seem to get almost all of their information from the Internet. Over time, I think that will make you stupid.

(The neutering of google books was a setback, but perhaps paradoxically good — it preserved a unique value of books)

There are also a lot of fluffy books published in the last 20 or so years - roughly equivalent to content farms - which is why older books that have stood the test of time are a good bet.
YouTube is rich so laws are irrelevant.
Archive.org link: https://web.archive.org/web/20221205155718/https://lawstreet...
You could use a form of overlay networking over WAN that would provide more anonymity.
The answer is not to "disconnect". The answer is to read critically, to read for argument, and to try to connect with the intent of what the author was saying. All the while realizing that most of the content out there is bullshit(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Bullshit), whether written by a human or not. And yes, the amount of bullshit is about to increase exponentially. But it was already a majority.

Ironically, this post itself doesn't pass that test. I'm not necessarily claiming that it was written by GPT-3 (although it could have been and I have a track record of pointing that out: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23894742) There are a lot of humans that write like this too.

But it has the hallmarks a language model text; it lacks an argument (beyond a simple sentence that could have been given in the prompt), its explanation of how generative models work isn't particularly accurate, its recommended course of action is anodyne and one has the sense that most of the sentences are just there to take up space.
But it is. I’m worried you might not have read the article. You are still entitled to your license after you read his appeal to your generosity and email him.
Well thankfully I haven't been in school for over a decade at this point, so rarely (never?) encounter these hard-cutoff no-second-chances trivia situations. I operate in the real world, where continually making something that's not-quite-correct then refining it and fixing the errors is how basically everything is accomplished.
Where in the above comments did I insist on (or even suggested) using Linux? I just hate "this is bad" comments, they make the discussions unreadable and useless.
What about crash safety though - newer cars are much better
I used to love magpies, until I got a dog.

I now hate magpies.
MUME, Multi-Users in Middle-Earth
MUME, Multi-Users in Middle-earth, is a multiplayer text-based online game based upon J. R. R. Tolkien’s Middle-earth during the epic war between the forces of the Dark Lord and the armies of the Free peoples. MUME is completely at no cost to play and has been continuously running, expanded, and remastered by a community of volunteers since 1991. The game just celebrated the release of version IX, the culmination of the last 20 years of development since version VIII.
... and now they have a picture of you everytime you fly.

Everything you say (and present) can and will be used against you.

Your exact appearance will be scrutinized possibly even years later in a way that no TSA agent could possibly remember, if someone decides to accuse you of a crime that involves transport like trafficking. "On such a such a date, our expert witness looked at the TSA photograph and nervousness detection program and the AI detected they were anxious and possibly intoxicated when passing through TSA. Your honor, this nervous and intoxicated behavior was detected by TSA computers on X Y Z and A B C dates as well. Our analysis shows traffickers disproportionately exhibited this behavior, which was listed as supporting evidence on the search warrant affadivit 6 months ago after which a roach was discovered in the defendants ash tray..."
It takes time for a human to type bullshit. AI can generate mountains of bullshit before a human author has got out of bed.
High Fidelity CRISPR
It's usually called "being young and naive"
BlockFi lending desk uses ~$1.7 billion of depositor funds and deploys capital to Grayscale to participate in GTBC’s NAV premium trade…

…and also extends Alameda a $680 million loan collateralized by now worthless FTT tokens…

…while BlockFi’s trading desk deploys $355 million to the FTX exchange..

…unfortunately, BlockFi’s risk management team failed to see the GBTC/3AC crypto winter and loses almost ~$1 billion of depositor funds…

..but to avoid bankruptcy FTX extends a $400 million credit facility to BlockFi collateralized by the now worthless FTT tokens…

..only to have Alameda Research caught in its own liquidity crunch vis-a-vis the downward pressure of the FTT ponzi token…

..to stop the bleeding SBF personally guarantees Alameda’s $680 million loan via his Robinhood stake…

….through a shell company called Emergent…

…which legally operates at arm’s length from FTX…

…but is controlled by SBF…

and funded by FTX revenues!
>Why is it that the current model for GMO aims to increase resistance to pesticides instead of simply growing the yield?

What? TONS of GMO foods are made for things other than pesticides. Nutritional content, size, yield, taste - in fact one of the biggest uses of GMOs is making the plants need less pesticides! If you think the only reason GMOs exist is to sell more pesticides, you just do not know what you are talking about.
Noticed that the question and answer were authored by the same person. Skimmed their other answers for fun and they are quite the expert. Very impressive ability to identify specific LEGO bricks.
And before then the 4.5V 'blue' rails (you could upgrade from that to the 12V system by swapping out the motor and adding the middle rail, but that lost you the ability to make certain tracks because then the two rails would end up being shorted out, which is why Maerklin long ago decided to use a center track for one pole and the outside for the other).
> There are some outliers (Texas) but in general its hard to just start your own power plant thats connected to the grid.

What if it's not and solely powered by solar (just wondering - Megachargers most likely need help from the grid).
Distinguishing two claims:

1. Hans Niemann is a cheater.

2. Hans Niemann defeated Magnus Carlsen by cheating in an over the board tournament.

I think claim (1) is well substantiated by chess.com's report.

There's no concrete evidence which supports (2).