skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This whole notion seems to be based on a bunch of seemingly logical conclusions, but it’s also a very narrow view of the reality.

Let’s just think for a minute about a single potentially confounding factor - every company has competitors. Those competitors are looking for every opportunity to climb past you, and they’ll be willing to hire humans to do anything a machine can’t.

For example… a lot of people still prefer to talk to a human when they need help with something. (Not me and I’m guessing not many people on HN, but we’re the outliers here.) Yes, you can try to use automation to solve for that… but if your competitor offers a better experience through human intervention, you are essentially forced to match their move and hire a support team.

Yes, automation is getting better, and who knows, maybe in a few years GPT3 will be having support conversations with customers. But the pressure to find a competitive advantage is often going to lead to hiring large numbers of people. That’s how we got to where we are today.
1) the £7000 payment was a transaction fee on the transfer of the land.

2) we have an independent valuation on file for the land at >1M. I wanted to reconfirm this with a member of my team before replying with specifics here, which you read as “he’s being evasive.” I was waiting for data.

The full documentation stack for the land is in the Asset Passport linked from the OpenSea listing.

If you want access to the documents email me and I’ll see about getting you an NDA and putting you in touch with the seller - they may or may not choose to satisfy your curiosity.

Thank you for your diligence.
Or, you know, explicitly trying to make sure north korea can sell the crypto they make with ransomware.
> My company will create a dating social network for chickens
This is hilarious. Thank you.
I agree with you, and it's amazing.

But the claim was that it's an example of how much more you can get done with ChatGPT when it seems like an example where the author got a lot less done than they would have with notepad.exe
> more about how consistency of state can be maintained across completely opaque commitments of transaction validity.

I have the same confusion as you, and I'm not sure I understood your last paragraph. The prover (person submitting a new transaction) can provide a ZKP that the transaction he is making is valid, and the blockchain will adopt it if indeed it's a valid proof. So then the onus of preventing the double-spend here effectively on the prover: he can only provide a valid ZKP for a valid transaction, and a double-spend would not be a valid transaction.

But then at the end of the day, seems like the underlying balance needs to be accessed somehow (otherwise how would the prover even know if he has enough funds avaliable?). I guess the prover (and only the prover) can do this because he presumably has access to the right private keys?
See my response here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/edit?id=33887467
You're right! We're linking this data to the negiotated rates :) and building the search engine for both of these at payless.health.
The issue is that Python passes references by value, so you cannot overwrite what the arguments of a function reference from the perspective of the caller. However, if you pass something like a dictionary or a class the function gets a copy of the reference and can use it to update the members of what was passed. Java operates on the same principle, although there may be some edge cases I'm not aware of where the two differ.
Another thought: perhaps LLMs will "commoditize the complement" of lots of IT work. I imagine lots of CoPilot-generated code will be deployed by naive people and organizations without proper "IT 101" stuff like backups, RBAC, PCI/SOX/GDPR compliance, etc. It might INCREASE the demand for some types of IT talent.
I picked up a mental weirdness from the internet and now can't get rid of it: Trypophobia. I never experienced anything like it until Trypophobia was trending a few years back.

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/21834-trypoph...
Okay, that is your view, it isn't mine. There isn't any reason to believe someone is going to be truthful or untruthful. For me, the best way is to develop your own detector. I don't have all the answers, so YMMV.

To the larger point, this isn't about absolute certainty - which is a red-herring and an unattainable ideal.
Unions by and large do work like this in the US. There's fewer unions, but the unions that do exist tend to do a very good job of representing their members. The main force acting against unionization efforts here isn't that the unions are ineffective, it's that they're so effective that companies fight tooth and nail to suppress them, including spreading a lot of propaganda.

And the problem with open shops and opt-in unions is that scabs can be found who think in terms of the short term. A company, in contrast, has the luxury of playing the long game. So, faced with union demands, a company can hire a bunch of scabs offering benefits and pay equivalent or better than the union is currently fighting for, then when the union is crushed gradually fire the scabs and replace them with new workers who are back to the square 1 the union was fighting from. And because unionizing takes effort and conviction, the new lot might not unionize. The company wins.
Sorry, that is indeed the intended pronunciation. In fact even briefer than that: more hayp’ny.

Just wanted to really get across that most importantly, the l and f are definitely both silent.
I wrote about my experiences driving a very non-neutral color. Life is too short to be that boring.

https://opposite-lock.com/topic/52688/tuscadero
It depends on if you're getting a new or a used part, no? Most times for cars over a few years old the shop can get a used panel off of a scrap car for much less than buying a new part, and in that case it might already match... Unless they are stripping and re-painting those, I have no idea.
If you're a SaaS Sales Engineer based in Seattle looking for a remote role for a New Zealand based company then give me a message
Absolutely - maybe not in immediate term but certainly it's coming.

I've been experimenting with GitHub Copilot in the past few days, the result is remarkable. Yes it's not quite ChatGPT but it's in the same vein, AI, machine learning etc.

It seems better with "boiler plate" like code, but hey it's a super charged auto complete and I'm impressed with its quality.

It can only get better from here.
L1 coins like ETH are natively compatible with L2s such as ZK-rollups. You don't need to use "L2 coins".
Can this system even produce sound? I just tried to ask it if it can understand the internal phonetic alphabet, and instead of answering, it spun for five minutes and then reported an error message with a link to OpenAI's help center.
Agreed — until it starts to harm people. Some are suggesting that this is creating harm for minors.
I think a big one is there just being fewer old programmers so you don't see them as much so you think there's ageism. But the market has grown a ton over the past 10-20 years.

None of my friends in their 40s have trouble getting jobs. This includes software jobs that tend to skew young, such as game dev and startups.

I wouldn't doubt it exists, but anecdotally it doesn't seem to be such a huge problem that you can't continue coding until a standard retirement age.
Is this real? That's bananas.
Aren't they based on the same underlying OpenAI technology?
I'm not sure they're even useful in gaming. The NFT games of 2020 have all collapsed, and there was huge backlash among gamers against normal games incorporating NFTs.
Yes! We are working on this and integrating with the OMOP common data model, to be able to link the health outcomes in our data partners' clinical repositories to the cost of care. For example, we work with the NIH All of Us study for outcome data (joinallofus.org -- I signed up both to contribute to this science and to get my whole genome sequenced free!)
I have always been a cyclist. Heck I even competed in the Sea Otter Classic mountain bike race when I was 15, where I got to ride my bike on Laguna Seca racetrack, which I think is neat. I am a cyclist even when I am not on my bike.

In recent years I haven't been riding much. A couple months ago I put an electric motor on my bike, and now I am riding it all the time. And I am still a cyclist!
It actually does, but in a measured way. You have to have a hybrid approach. Agile for stuff like little software features and bug fixes, waterfall for big important (often safety and effectively tied) milestones they often precede an animal or human study. Iterate the smaller less safety critical features (which are often software based) and then align the exit of one of those phases with a hardware freeze that captures key safety and effectivity in the hardware and then do a cadaver, animal or human study to prove it. You don't want to apply agile to the hardware usually.
Outside of elective surgical realms, I've also seen and heard of trends of expensive non-treatment treatments that prolong misery. Take orthopedics with routine cortisone and/or hyaluronic acid injections: delaying the "inevitable" and sometimes hurrying it along.

Then there's the outright Medicare fraud of orthotics, braces, and all sorts of overpriced, shoddy paraphernalia that's mostly concerned with coding (billing) rather than patient comfort or wellbeing.
I'm not sure the short answer is adequate but a few things:

1) US healthcare is absolutely huge, it's perhaps 20% of the total macro economy. Changing anything in 20% of the entire economy is going to take a long time.

2) There has been really significant changes regarding price transparency and "surprise" billing in the past 5 years, so there is momentum to improve the patient experience but see #1

3) Regarding hospitals, many hospitals might appear to be one thing but are not (some systems are fully vertically integrated). They are much more like medical malls, often as a result of CPOM. What you percieve as one thing actually involved dozens of different business entities and hence very discoordinated billing.
Well that’s good. Let me pay for it, heck let me host it so I am sure. But getting audited is a good first step.
Interesting. I think that someone at Hertz may have made the original statement without authorization. The original article includes the text:

>"A Hertz spokesperson, who asked not to be identified, said that payments or even the eventual recovery of the car did not wipe away what it views as the original theft."

That is bizarre. I am a reporter; I cover news. The spokespeople of major corporations don't request anonymity. Anonymity is reserved for sensitive sources. It's literally the job of a spokesperson to speak on behalf of a company. They don't seek anonymity.

The second version of the article doesn't include the statement that Hertz's spokesperson requested anonymity. Which makes me think that the original source was either not a spokesperson at all, or that they might have been speaking without authorization.

The comment is still weird, but in the context of that article, Hertz doesn't come across that poorly, IMO. If you rent a car, and the rental company asks that it be returned after your rental period is over, going to the point of calling you multiple times, sending you letters, sending you a letter via Certified Mail, and finally trying to repo the car — all before reporting the car as stolen... well... that's kind of on you when the car is subsequently reported as stolen. Even if you kept paying for it. No? People don't have the right to unilaterally extend their rental period. According to Hertz, in 100% of cases, they did all of the above prior to reporting vehicles as stolen.
This is incorrect/misleading on many fronts:

1. This is an outdated article citing a single point in time

2. The source tweet is comparing Uniswap's volume on all x:ETH pairs against only ETHUSDT volume on centralized exchanges. [0]

3. The date of comparison is an outlier day - when FTX's "hacker" decided to move huge sums of tokens uneconomically on chain.

4. Volume across CEXs have collapsed, a sign of the ecosystem's weakness, not strength.

5. Even then, Uniswap doesn't hold a candle to Binance. ($600m volume vs $10b volume, past 24 hours on spot pairs)

6. Liquidity is horrible right now. If you try to execute a trade of reasonable size on a non-major coin you will face a lot of slippage.

[0]: The tweeter, Alex Svanevik is the founder of Nansen, a chain analytics company. It doesn't make sense that he would make such a simple mistake unless he was deliberately trying to bullpost.

See for yourself:

https://www.coingecko.com/en/exchanges/uniswap#statistics

https://www.coingecko.com/en/exchanges/binance#statistics

https://www.coingecko.com/en/exchanges/coinbase#statistics
"putty-ass" isn't any less cringe-worthy. Depending on your chosen vernacular, it may even be more-so.
I was thinking of doing the same thing with my son (breadboarding the Nibbler). He has built a virtual computer with nandgame.com but asked me if he could build a real one. The nand game computer is 16-bit and would be a nightmare to build from TTL, but the Nibbler looks doable. This would be my largest breadboarding project by far, though, and I would appreciate any hints you could give me, especially regarding how to test the circuit while building it.
I have made a similar switch recently. I grew tired of having to use an OS that seem more and more designed to push me in a direction I do not want.
Alternatively you work hard for 5-10 years saving money and then find the fulfilling but less pay career/job.
The fact that a lack of regulation results in a marketplace of scams was known before bitcoin was invented. Naivety of that is not acceptable. Bitcoin chose not to build in any protections in a financial systems to stop scams means they were purposely, or out of abject stupidity, leaving them out. Bitcoin doesn't get to say "oops we can add the ability to stop scams later" because it should have been table stakes from the very beginning

But bitcoin was literally built to be free from regulation. Why is that?
> No, the attacker still needs physical access to the device, because signing requires on-device approval.

You're assuming that the Bluetooth implementation does not introduce vulnerabilities that thwart this assumption; GP & GGGP are suggesting that you shouldn't have to make this assumption in a hardware wallet (or hardware that requires this very high level of assurance), by not including it at all. The same goes for, say, an attacker who's able to swap your wireless charger for a malicious one, and potentially execute a power usage-based side channel if you access the device while it's charging, or who's able to extract some useful information from the RF noise produced by the monitor.

The counterargument to this, in my mind, would be that you plan to use these features of the wallet regularly, and that they provide sufficient benefit to justify the risk (which you may argue is quite modest), and perhaps that you've implemented additional mitigations against them (like never using it while it's charging). Your argument about a monitor adding additional assurance in a sibling thread was quite good I thought, and a tact I didn't anticipate in this list originally.
Miami is spending hundreds of millions to keep the water at bay. Some streets regularly flood high enough to swamp a car.

https://phys.org/news/2021-02-flood-prone-miami-billions-tac...

> The area, with extensive wetlands and sitting on porous stone that acts like a sponge, makes the state one of the most at risk from rising sea levels. The problem is so visible that, during the summer rainy season, it is common to see Miamians kayaking along flooded avenues and cars sunk up to their windows.

https://e360.yale.edu/features/as-miami-keeps-building-risin...

> Municipalities here have set aside at least $800 million to fight the rising sea.

> And the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has proposed to boost the spending with a $4.6 billion plan to secure Miami from storm surge

> The City of Miami Beach spent some $400 million installing pumps and raising streets around neighborhoods that regularly flooded during high tides
There was a safety reason why they got rid of the flip-up headlights.

https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/mazda-mx5-miata-history/

still, those were super-cool. You could flip them up without turning on the lights, and one Miata driver would greet another one in the oncoming lane by doing that.
Any purchase of anything for any reason is self-defeating by this logic, due to the opportunity cost of forgoing investment.
If you are a really serious about this, I don’t see why the sellers of the land would not be happy to take you up on the offer.

As noted in the other comment, we do have an independent valuation on file.

The deal is legitimate. If you feel like following through, do feel free to drop me an email.
Right in the footer on the left side are all the payment options.
https://i.imgur.com/RvBDaw2.png
There is a brief section called "Water Production".
And some automakers actively discourage factory orders.

The other problem is that while both partners in a couple may like bright colors, they may like different bright colors, so something neutral becomes a reasonable tradeoff.
> OTOH, you have the single European market (the EU forces games, apps, hardware, etc to be sold at the same price everywhere in the EU in practical terms),

That's not true, where are you imagining this from? Hardware certainly doesn't cost the same, at the very least there are different VAT levels, but also pricing is adapted to the local market (literally just checked, i can get an Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 for 300€ less in Bulgaria compared to France). Software I'm unsure how to check, but Netflix costs varies by county.
I believe so, but the integration with IDE works amazingly well. It's non-intrusive and just ... works.

You don't have to do anything, just install and it will start suggesting code as you work on it.

It's very promising.
It was that awful seed pod boob photoshop image that did it to you too, wasn't it?
Where the discussion goes off the rails and becomes less enlightening in my opinion is railing against using and ultimately killing animals in the pursuit of scientific advancement in general versus something unique or specific about how Neuralink uses animals.

My personal belief is that animals are absolutely crucial at this point for many scientific purposes. Some things which animals were used for in the past can reasonably be done without killing animals, thru computer simulation or modeling, and certainly animals should not be needlessly killed, or intentionally left to suffer.

Animal use should be reduced when reasonable, but particularly in the case of animals which are also feedstock, it’s logically absurd to even minimally constrain scientific research to reduce the number of pigs and sheep killed worldwide by a few hundred or thousand animals when they are bred by the millions to be slaughter and eaten.

What’s interesting to me is the nuanced discussion of serial versus parallel testing, and the need for sometimes re-testing.

When you have a matrix of potential choices, you can minimize the number of tests overall by serializing the process, at the expense of maximizing the duration of testing.

If you parallelize the testing, similar to branch prediction in CPUs, you will end up running tests that would not have been needed, but you complete the overall experiment faster.

The trade-off of time is not merely a matter of impatience. The capital costs must be absolutely tremendous, and the likelihood we even get to the point sometime in the future where there’s a life-altering treatment that is FDA approved, and the ultimate cost of that treatment, is highly dependent on how long it takes to achieve the fundamental research objectives and overcome the extraordinary challenges they are facing.

So it’s not simply arrogance or apathy, a serial approach could very well either make the treatment uneconomical, or even make the R&D costs and timelines un-fundable.

As someone who had rack of lamb for dinner last week and bacon for breakfast this morning, this research is absolutely on a higher moral plane and IMO it would be abhorrent to tell paraplegics that Neuralink is doing anything even remotely wrong by trying to accelerate this research while American pig farms produces 2 billion pounds of bacon every year.
Right, and only recently did they start providing things like "background-thread image decoding" out of the box. In general you really have to take care that you are marshaling correctly if you bounce between main/background.
Some of the basic hot-loading features can probably be approximated in Python. Here's some from my bookmarks(i've not tried them personally)

- https://github.com/breuleux/jurigged

- https://github.com/reloadware/reloadium

I would imagine lisp can do this on a whole different level. Emacs seems like a testament to that. Basically the entire editor feels like eval()
No, they're mistaken, there is no such thing.
The Soldier Who Survived WWII Thanks to Accidentally Overdosing on Meth
Why charge $1000 once when you can charge $400 six times?

I refuse to use apps like this. None of my Apple IDs have payment information associated with them.
Hahahahaha, this will wreak HAVOC on GoDaddy's domain-squatting spam-business.

I can't prove anything but the last time we've brainstormed a brand and domain name, within a couple of days ALL of the name variants we searched for (which were free at the time of first search, and we did the search on an EU service) were taken, registered to GoDaddy, and a "helpful representative" offered us to buy it off them for like 150x the retail price.

The more people use tools like this to spam the squatters, the better.
I think you are deeply confused about this topic and should not be making judgements about other people. Instead of making an honest attempt to understand the difference between pass by value and pass by reference, you are trying to mince words to save face and even your attempt to mince words is incorrect.

While I likely can not convince you further that you are in error, especially since you're now trying to double down on this, for others reading this who have a genuine desire to understand this topic, please understand that Java, JavaScript and Python do not pass by reference, but instead pass by value and refrain from attempting to redefine technical terminology.

The references I cite are quite authoritative and unambiguous on this topic.
That's there to ensure you know how cool and hip they are.

Not only did they just release a thing, that does stuff, and is progress. But they did it over the weekend between surf without breaking a sweat because they are pro. /s
We're actively thinking of ways where we host the service within a customer's tenant - more coming soon!
And similarly there are other countries that are much more lax when it comes to animal and human studies, so there is a cottage industry of US and european companies doing clinical work in those countries before doing their big US or EU studies. Each country has different laws, different lines that can or can't be crossed. Your example and mine are both good examples.
So it had twins.
I bought a wallet from Ledger once. Ledger then got hacked & now I get texts weekly with different crypto scams targeted at me. Never again.
It's a good forcing function to make me consider whether I should even bother or just leave the site when I see that popup.
What checksums could you verify?
Bluetooth is a huge attack surface. Most Bluetooth stacks are something like 100k lines of C, written by electrical engineers. It's a nest of bugs and vulnerabilities.

There's probably more code in the Bluetooth stack than the entire rest of the code on the device.
I commuted daily to work on a RadCity bike pre-covid (wfh since then) and my experience with it was excellent.
Not sure if that rises to the level of sexual blackmail with minors but okay!