skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Alternative take:

No-one likes being lied to. AI is the ultimate deception. People will stop using the internet for anything other than information retrieval for problems.

Artists will create on digital tools and then return to analogue publishing formats and distribution networks. People will follow them because artists are cool and tech bros aren’t. There will be an emphasis on becoming a local success story rather than a global one.

You can already see this happening some what. Vinyl records are increasing sales every year. People are getting tired of Spotify and are buying on bandcamp. Typewriters are growing in use. Digital book sales have stalled and people are buying paper books again.

I think this will become a new social identifier, particularly for those on the left of the political spectrum.
Check out speeduino. Software and hardware are open source.
Next : mandatory helmet for pedestrians. You never know, it could save your life. It’s not the end of the world to wear one.
But you out the solution right there in your prediction. We need updated licenses that forbid the use in AI training and real teeth if it can be shown that content was illegally used in a training set.

It might be too late with the amount of data already ingested, but, hell, second best time to plant a tree and all that.
We could just do what the Netherlands does and make streets/paths safe for biking rather than armoring up bikers to deal with a more dangerous environment.
Since 1 May 2018.

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-V/p...
Magnus lost to Hans playing the white pieces, something that hasn't happened in years. The next time they played, Magnus played 1 move and then instantly resigned and dropped out of the tournament. On Twitter, he posted a clip saying "If I speak, I get in big trouble". Many people saw this as an accusation of cheating, including large chess streamer Hikaru Nakamura (who is mentioned in the defamation suit). Magnus later came out to say that yes, he thinks Hans cheated. Hans says that he only cheated a few times as a kid, but never since then. Chess.com then released a report detailing games in which he most likely cheated based on statistical analysis, as well as old emails between the site and Hans where Hans admits to cheating in multiple online games. This showed that he very clearly lied when he said he only cheated a few times as a kid, and never since then.

It should be noted that there was no direct evidence of cheating in the game vs Magnus. However, Magnus is insanely good at chess, and his word carries a lot of weight when it comes to fair play (despite the obvious bias). The main reason people don't like him is because of the cheating, not because of the specific game. The game is just what brought this entire situation up, and how a lot of his past cheating started getting exposed.
>AI's are not needed to produce crappy repetition which is eagerly gobbled by the masses

True, but humans that create this kind of crap still have to sleep, eat, and generally not pay attention to feeding the machine. meanwhile the AI terminator is out there, it can't be bargained with, it can't be reasoned with, it doesn't feel pity or remorse or fear, and it absolutely will not stop… EVER, until you are buried in an ocean of garbage content.
Its also $10 of taxable income to Petsmart, net canceling it all out.
Paralympian claims Canada offered to euthanise her when she asked for stairlift
No. I believe that I could do more good by donating more, and hijack these requests as prompts to do that. It's just a motivational hack rather than erasing red from my ledger.
There are many liquidity problems brewing that when combined create a dangerous and uncommon financial environment.

Other than the changes happening with the U.S Dollar as global reserve currency, some of this manifests itself in the Reverse Repo Market. You can see over the last several years and since the 2008 crisis that it has grown exponentially. This typically can be used as an indirect measure of Treasury Liquidity as a whole, which Yellen at the Treasury has been warning about.

With this comes an unwinding of quanatitiavive easing, also in place for over a decade and will continue to have unknown effects. It's safe to assume that much of the economy and zombie companies were able to exist on basically free money.

As all of this comes together, and if the robbing peter to pay Paul economy continues where trillions can be created just by modifying a balance sheet, then things could end very poorly.

Pension funds, real estate both commercial and residential, and many other factors could lead to a bond market crash and a debt crisis that would have no way out since everything is so over leveraged on easy money already.

While the future of inflation is up in the air, it remains to be seen if the Fed can manage all of these actions without causing a severe recession.

We might find that a bandaid was put on the global economy after 2008 and much of the structural problems remain.

Government spending on all kinds of things will have to be reduced along with the Feds balance sheet and where this leads is unknown.
This is why I prefer separate SSDs (NVM.e) on my system based on usage.

* `/root`, System/OS: fastest SSD with plenty of spare space
* `/home`: 1+ TB for data, games, media, etc...
* swap, `/tmp`, `/var`: separate cheap SSD (or even HDD) for frequent and unimportant writes
Unless they're all replaced by AI some years in the future. Good luck countersuing a bunch of GPUs gone rogue.
>I find this whole episode very unpleasant. How one famous person's word against can make you a pariah to entire community; just like that.

One famous person's word and Han's own history as a cheater that is.
Right. I still try to look for mid-prace quality goods, but in the recent years, I've started to realize it often had bad ROI.

What's extra annoying is that companies are burning brands on this, and as they're transitioning from selling quality goods to peddling cheap crap, they of course don't tell you about it. Instead, you see metal being swapped for plastics, screws for glue, assembly being worse and worse - while their marketing departments double down on highlighting how pretty, modern, quality and smart this years' model is.
Couldn't this help a 10x engineer become a 100x engineer? The secret is still going to be in understanding what to ask for and ensuring that what gets spit out works. It's just going to be so much faster. Is there anyplace in the world for a .5x developer or even a 1x developer in a chatgpt world?
The image of "Ryan" in the footer seems to be taken from a photographer's portfolio page: https://headshotcrew.com/studiomcgrath
I've only gotten feedback once, at a goodwill. I used a birthday coupon or some such discount and when I refused to "donate" any amount to whatever charity, she said under her breath that since I got the discount I should at least donate.

Since it was under her breath, and since these workers are generally ill treated and underpaid (quite literally less than minimum wage) anyway, I decided not to make a scene, but I very much felt insulted that they would want me to donate to a charity after they just sold me a product they received for free.
Right but in this case the actions taken were wrong, were not fixed, and still are not fixed.

Like the fact only in near future it will be legal for US cars to have adaptive lights. Or how for years [1] near every car light was same ineffective design.

Over-regulation is as dangerous as under-regulation. If car manufacturers have to squeeze fleet averages (which is on its own retarded idea, just tax every model separately ffs) for normal cars. Or how apparently 20MPG sportscar is "gas guzzler" but 15MPG SUV is not

* [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2J91UG6Fn8
Dementia risk may increase if you're eating these foods, study says
Surprisingly, there is actually some official guidelines about anti-cheat and bans:

https://edpb.europa.eu/system/files/2022-01/edpb_guidelines_...

> Example 3: GAMER X is registered as a user on the gaming platform of PLATFORM Y. One day, GAMER X is notified that his online account has been restricted. As he is unable to log in anymore, GAMER X asks the controller for access to all personal data relating to him. In addition, GAMER X requires access to the reasons for the account restriction. PLATFORM Y, the controller of the online gaming platform with which the request has been lodged, informs the users in its general terms and conditions available on its website, that any kind of cheating (mainly by the use of third party software) will entail a periodical or permanent ban from its platform. PLATFORM Y also informs the users in its privacy policy about the processing of personal data for the purpose of detecting gaming cheats, in accordance with the requirements set out in Art. 13 GDPR.

> Upon receipt of GAMER X’s request for access, PLATFORM Y should provide GAMER X with a copy of the personal data processed about GAMER X. Regarding the reason for the account restriction, PLATFORM Y should confirm GAMER X that it decided to restrict GAMER X’s access to online games due to the use of one or repeated gaming cheats which are in violation with the general terms of use. In addition to the information provided about the processing for the purpose of gaming cheat detection, PLATFORM Y should grant GAMER X access to the information it has stored about GAMER X’s gaming cheats which led to the restriction. In particular, PLATFORM Y should provide GAMER X with the information that led to the restriction of the account (e.g. log overview, date and time of cheating, detection of third party software,...) in order for the data subject to verify that the data processing has been accurate.

> However, according to Art. 15(4) and Recital 63 GDPR, PLATFORM Y is not bound to reveal any part of the technical operating of the anti-cheat software even if this information is relating to GAMER X as long as this is can be regarded as trade secrets. The necessary balancing of interests under Art. 15(4) will have the result that the trade secrets of PLATFORM Y preclude the disclosure of this personal data because knowledge of the technical operating of the anti-cheat software could also allow the user to circumvent future cheat or fraud detection

> The extent of the information provided to individuals will be heavily context dependent, taking into account the nature of the data controller and the nature of the breach of the terms of service. In some cases, it may only be possible for the data controller to provide basic information in response to an access request to which Art. 15(4) applies

So at least some information should be provided while some things could fall under the trade secret exception. I would imagine at least some cases need to go to DPA in order to get some clarification on what information must be provided and which things they could avoid disclosing, but that is going to take quite a while to get any resolution on.
I'm surprised to find this comment at the bottom of the comment section. My advice, like yours, is to profile performance issues before getting into the hypothesis-change-measure loop. Like you said, it quickly bifurcates the problem space into application code and the JVM and eliminates entire classes of performance problems.

It's important to point out too that while most people assume cpu profiling, the JVM and hence most profiling tools also have memory profiling which can be helpful in diagnosing problems (especially ones related to GC). I hope the querent ends up profiling and shares the results. It would be both fun and productive to investigate the results collaboratively.
Why would some god come and save a few elephants by evolution after giving man free will and knowing exactly what was going to happen? Are the socio-economic conditions in Mozambique purely man-made? What's so important about free will, anyway? Just one thing in the creation. And there isn't much support for the idea that free will was given on purpose, as a high principle, is there?

But your counter argument is just setting up for more of that "mysterious ways" babble that the clergy have been using for centuries to keep the plebs coming to church. And pay their tithes.

So, if you ask me: what does it take to accept that a particular deity is real: at least do an open, clear, undeniable miracle, not weakly undo something you've set up yourself and have let fester for too long.
Global Entry is reasonable:

1. Border crossing rules

2. Photo ID with an ID indexed to a background checked record as one of the rules

3. YOU are the one crossing the border, already declared and known, so there is no new information for authorities

By contrast, driving, taking a bus or train, or flying A to B domestically, an ID check feels like incremental "papers please".
> Mandatory helmet laws do not prevent people from riding bikes.

Mandatory helmet laws say to people "Look Out! Bicycles are DANGEROUS! No matter how careful or experienced you are or where you're cycling, you could get your head smashed like a bowl of eggs at any time"

If that's not an anti-cycling message, what is?
> $200/kW net in 1983 dollars.

So, it adds less than 200 million dollars per GW of storage. This is not large. It's also misleading to portray retrofitting plants as an expense that new nuclear builds would require: it's a lot harder and more expensive to do a retrofit than it is to incorporate these changes in the initial construction.

And again, three mile island was contained. Secondary storage worked. If these retrofits are expensive, they were evidently not necessary.

> At 58% capacity factor with ~20% forced outage rates you are going to have many, long, correlated outages.

Good thing nuclear power averages a capacity factor of over 90%! By comparison what's the capacity factor for solar and wind? 25% depending on geography.

> Alsk [sic] keep in mind that on the list of reactor prices from 1968 to 1979, the prices went up the entire time. Your learning rate is negative even in the Nuclear boom.

And again, you skew the timelines to fit your narrative. The nuclear boom started in 1965, and saw large price decreases from plants starting construction before then. That's the price drops brought about by the nuclear boom. Reactors continued to be cheap until three mile occurred and reactors that had started construction in the mid 70s had to deal with a whole ton of nuclear obstructionism. That's why price increases among reactors that started construction in the mid 1970s and later. Restrict the query to reactors completed before three mile island and there's no increase in cost. The chart I posted handily put those in a different color, but this is apparently not obvious enough for you.
Nah, when someone changes their name like in the case of marriage but I don't approve of the marriage for some reason I don't go around calling them by their "real name" and refuse to acknowledge the change. When someone wants to go by another set of words to identify themselves, like pronouns, I'm also not a jerk about it.

You don't know anyone's medical history. You haven't given anyone a karyotype test. You'd use a new set of names for people in many circumstances and even pronouns likely in the case of an obvious intersex condition. Your decision to call Eliot Page she against his wishes is clearly ideologically driven and hateful. A petty snub more or less.

Doing it makes you a cruel person. I'm sure you don't see yourself that way, but, newsflash, humans generally want to be "good" so most cruel people think they are good and justified in their actions. They just have some toxic/anti-social ideas rooted into their sense of morality.

In this case it seems you've convinced yourself that by snubbing transgender people you're somehow protecting... truth? BiOloGiCal ReAlItY? Gendered terms predate any concept of sex chromosomes or even gametes. Jeez Ottomans worried about their concubines getting pregnant from EUNUCHS because they didn't fully realize that testes created sperm or that sperm was separate from semen. That's why they preferred dark skinned eunuchs, so they could tell if a baby was illegitimate.... Which is just to say that if you want to be "traditional" gendered terms are about surface level assessments of a person's physical appearance and social roles considered appropriate to such an appearance, not biology. If you transported Patti Harrison[1] (a very passable trans woman) back to King Arthur's court she'd be treated like a lady I assure you.

The even more fundamental thing though is respecting people's autonomy. It's a very aggressive act to call someone by labels that they dislike. Try continually getting someone's name wrong on purpose, maybe call a guy named Ted Bruce all the time, and see how your relationship with that person develops....

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ku_WIbDd9rc
The Lifehacker article definitely implies that stores are not counting your donation as their own donation.

> it will not include your donation as part of its business receipts, or income, nor will it claim the charitable gift as an expense.

(And the order of operations is not so relevant. From a tax perspective, there's no difference if it forwards your donations and calls it their own, or makes its own donation and reimbursing itself with your donation. In both cases it doesn't lose any money and gets to illegally claim a tax deduction.)

This particular case is about a legal obligation, not a tax credit, but in either case it's unethical and illegal to call customer's donations your own.
And then you wrote DOS as your first program as a whiz kid. We see you BillG. Don’t need to brag.
The West just scrambled the oil market. What happens next is up to Russia
Isn’t the issue here the conclusions drawn from this supposed evidence? Seems like the kind of thing they wouldn’t bother taking to court if the best they can muster is AI or “expert witness” as they’ll be laughed out of it.
because maybe it understands that banning stuff is not to be done lightly. any action that restricts anyone's individual freedom must be very carefully vetted.

because without freedom we will die. but this also applies to the corporations whose rights are now in opposition with our own human individual necessities.

if I want to gift a copy of a copyrighted material owned by a corporation, I can still do it, but it's getting more difficult; and I in fact may well be prosecuted criminally for doing that. this is an example of my right to do what I want (give a copied gift) stands in opposition with the right of a corporation to get its way. I fear human individuals are losing this battle.
If there is infinite content you will dislike an infinite amount of it. Infinities are weird that way.
There are a few carve-outs to section 230, as your link mentions:

If you said “Section 230 is why there’s piracy online”
You again may be the NY Times or someone who has not read Section 230. Section 230 explicitly exempts intellectual property law:
Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or expand any law pertaining to intellectual property.

So when it comes to copyright, the DMCA takes precedence over section 230, and sites that don't follow the take-down procedures spelled out in the DMCA do indeed become liable (loose safe-harbor) for the specific content that they failed to enforce. If the site demonstrates a pattern of not complying, then copyright holders could even argue in court that they are liable for large classes of works without having to provide evidence of non-compliance for each individual work.

There are other carve-outs for CSAM and sex trafficking.

It is true that they don't become liable for all unrelated user content (say libel or harassment) because of this, so in that sense they still have safe harbor in general, but saying that they have lost safe harbor for particular content is a valid use of the term.
LANPAR spreadsheet compiler
Tbh I'm tired, even I or someone else explain it, I don't think it will change the decade old bias here. Any bad/misinformation filled crypto article gets lots of upvotes. Then with time stripe/paypal/visa etc. starts using and offers to business to accept it. After years, nobody think why they so late, why they offer now etc. So no point to prove any information to public here. Again it's ponzi, right? Simple. Just ponzi. Yet blocks are being mined without any interruption for more than a decade.
The analogy was clearly used to make a point about feedback not being required to come with suggestions attached, not because they wanted to call the developer a dog kicker. If you really couldn't tell that, as opposed to you're just trolling, you could take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor to learn more about this conversational tool.
He's not proven guilty because the issue is did he cheat OTB when he played Magnus. The answer is no.
I hit a great example; got my Tesla to the garage and they asked me to put it jack mode.

I couldn't find it, Google's first result said categorically that the Model 3 required a jack mode... I realised that it was auto generated junk and searched through a few pages and found something solid that showed me that it didn't.
I don't agree that backup cameras are mandated (I may be missing some federal regulation, however). The regulations (that I've seen) provide a list rearward visibility tests that the vehicle must pass. There are no modern cars that can pass these tests without a backup camera, but I think that many sedans from the 1980s and maybe even the early 1990s could pass them without backup cameras.
How to 3D Print a Gun – 101
Step-by-Step instructions to 3D print a gun from the comfort of your home.

- Step 1 – 3D Gun Printing Buyers Guide
- Step 2 – Slicer Guide
- Step 3 – Preparing 3D Printer
- Step 4 – 3D Print a Gun
- Step 5 – Procuring Parts Kits
- Troubleshooting
Show HN: Eleven – Code sandboxes running in your cloud provider account
Hey HN,

Eleven is the second project that I've built to learn Go. It lets you create a code sandbox in your cloud provider account easily.

What's a "code sandbox"? Just a VM, running in your cloud provider account, with some runtimes pre-installed, your repositories cloned, a way to connect to it with your preferred editor (or via SSH) and a way to serve your apps easily via HTTP (with automatic HTTPS).

You could use it to deploy your app, as a remote development environment or even to test some code. It's up to you.

For example, to deploy a Node.JS app:

$ eleven aws init hello-world --runtimes node@18.7.0 --repositories eleven-sh/hello-world

> Success! The sandbox "hello-world" was initialized.

$ ssh eleven/hello-world forever node index.js

> Forever: command started. Run "forever stop" in current path to stop.

$ eleven aws serve hello-world 8000 --as hello.eleven.sh

> Success! The port "8000" is now reachable at: https://hello.eleven.sh

$ curl https://hello.eleven.sh

> Hello World

Still learning Go by the way, so I'm open to any suggestions to improve.
This is one of the main reasons I could never own a lot of crypto currencies. "Not your keys not your coins" sounds great until you're hit by a bus and family members have to figure out what you own. At least if you have an exchange account a lawyer can probably find it.
IANAL, but as I understand contract law you can’t be expected to perform the contract if circumstances change too much (law of frustration). The developer here indicated they never expected to be providing support for a quarter century, and it doesn’t seem unreasonable a court would agree they aren’t bound by the “lifetime” license.
Wow, this is eye-opening. What a scummy tactic.

Do they also claim tax write-offs for your donations?