skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
100%, but not in all fields, because you will lose important opportunities.

Main nuance, in modern extremely concurrent world, business need access to cheap money for fast grow, but to got cheap money, need to be open, not anonymous, because investors want to know, who run business in which they invested.

Second, most businesses, sure not all, benefit from wide network of partners, and most owners also don't like to deal with anonymous.

Partner as face is not enough to solve these issues. But this depends on business culture of country. In some parts of world, this is considered normal, in other, this is nonsense, or in best case, weirdness, and in any case people don't like to give money to somebody weird.

So, anonymous will constantly suffer losses, but as I said, in some niches it is not important.
Its the reverse. Far easier to see invis units on lower graphics and textures settings than it is on high/ultra textures.
If you jump onto twitch and have a look, many of the high level players will have the game on the lowest settings graphics settings for this reason although plenty also just run it looking nice for the audiences sake.
Ironically, given battery availability as the limiting factor in EV adoption, you are far better off for CO2 emission using the one big battery in an EV to power dozens (or more!) hybrids!
Which one of these did you like the most?
A Vultr instance running a PostgreSQL container linked with block storage is pretty cheap and easy to set up.
I hope they debrief here. I would think with the rise in indie hackers this would be a run away product.
I had to quit using DuckDuckGo's News service since it puts MSN garbage at the top of all its search results (DDG is just a wrapper around Bing, AFAIK).
Because the impact on your code by going with a serverless platform.

Generally speaking if it's the platform you have you will shoehorn the shape of your code into a serverless shape bucket even if it has no business looking like that.
These architectural shortcomings will inevitably come back to haunt you.

Also most of these platforms amount to cgi-bin v2, meaning things like memory leaks and requests that hang get swept under the rug.
Meaning you already have very difficult to diagnose failures and when you do eventually go to migrate you will find your code is full of these smells making it harder to reform into something reasonable.

That is also putting aside the spaghetti nature of intertwined functions of any serverless codebase of scale, the huge IaC overhead if you go with something like AWS Lambda and the massive amount of incidental complexity that serverless advocates try to make you look the other way for (hello API Gateway).
You wont know until you try. I found that doing something you love, you will try anything to make it happen. It starts out small and its not like it requires one to be solid in every area of the business right away like the areas you mentioned. Some times people want to compete against well established markets and that is a recepie for disaster. But again, it depends on the niche you have decided on. Also it takes time and people cut you slack if you are delivering value to them that's authentic. I found this source great for starting new business: https://fronterablog.com/
Ok, I tried doing this but now its blocking me from posting further. I think since it needs to keep context, jumping back and forth with ls, cd is causing issues.

For my iteration there were 4 videos in the Documents folder, would have been cool to see what they videos were...
> Graeber misinterprets the history and ideas of mainstream economics

Can you provide a well researched body of literature that counters Graeber’s thesis as opposed to just stating an opinion?
Looks cool, although I’m a little curious about the LED controllers that are coming soon. Will they have any clear advantages over WLED?
GPT-3 has been trolling simple examples too. I think it comes from what it crawled. You will find very few conversations like that with just correct data, what gets popular and how jokes are made is when there is a twist.

Your comment is an example of such data too.
You're just not understanding the situation.

Someone in Microsoft has a KPI related to the percentage of machines updated with the latest patches every month.

He or she can best meet their KPIs at the low, low cost of the occasional destroyed laptop, fire, or -- very rare -- customer death.

People just have to accept the risk of burning to death so that this person can meet their KPIs by forcefully updating laptops even if they're hibernating, in a laptop bag, and in the cargo hold of an airliner.

Those passengers knew what they were signing up for when they boarded that plane together with a Windows user.
I agree, the python code is not good at all, and at the moment would not work for any realistic application.

The issue is more with the premise of an AI writing code potentially harmful to humans, especially it gets better
Did I miss something? I didn’t see anything explicitly stated, but I took that number to mean that Wasabi was doing simple port enumeration—there are only 65,535 ports that need to be checked to enumerate a TCP network interface.

Edit: I did miss a key paragraph—they keys are also 16 bits–port enumeration was just the first place my mind went.
You might not want to, but you should put some of that information on your website. Otherwise this is a huge red flag against the "Radix project" you are advertising there. If not for the information in this thread, I would stay the hell away from a project "founded in part by one of the original architects" from the ashes of the one which died suddenly without any explicit reason.

You don't have to put your dirty laundry there, but you should at least mention that the Fosshost leadership moved on, and that it's the other members that are starting Radix.
Warning: this book can make it difficult to communicate with other people, if you expect them to think like you do. So many people evaluate the quality of decisions based on results, and so many of them are outright hostile to the ideas suggested herein.

Further, in any given situation, variance swaps all - so don't expect to be able to say "i told ya so".

I firmly believe this book helps make my life better in terms of making better decisions, but it is not a book you want to trot out at cocktail parties unless you enjoy arguments. And I will also say - people get offended when you ask them to put money down on their perspective, even after you disagree. So it appears to be true, people know it's true when money is on the line, but will still argue with you.

Let it change how you think, but if you want something to discuss with others, go with Gladwell or Freakonomics.
From the sources I looked at, NDSA is supposed to be less than 1,000 satellites by 2030 which isn’t a huge jump over what they already have. They just don’t benefit from that kind of satellite density at the bottom of LEO when it comes at the cost of lower lifespan.

What they want from NDSA is multiple different systems each with a separate focus that can all use a uniform transmission layer.
Joost Meerloo's "Rape of the mind".

Its an incredible older book looking at the mechanisms exploited by totalitarian systems to subdue their victims. Namely nazi Germany, soviet Russia and revolutionary China.

The author was part of the dutch resistance against the nazi occupation and headed the psychological department of the dutch army in exile after he had to flee mainland Europe. He later also acted as a witness for the defense in the trial against Frank Schwable for collaborating as a PoW in Korea.

In addition to the really interesting and still highly relevant topic his writing shows him to be among the other awe inspiring scientists of the "greatest generation". Its quite simply an extremely impressive yet pleasant to read opus magnum.
Tech CEOs are quietly asking employees to step it up or risk getting fired
I like that there are so many official reddit clients available at once:

reddit.com — react
old.reddit.com — jquery
sh.reddit.com — lit, tailwind
i.reddit.com — backbone.js, jquery

Any others?
Isn't it the case of the US ?
"It's not cheap, but I'm sure the government will buy it."
I tried fergal_reid's example with a single variation, changing "highly intelligent" to "very smart" for the first species. Initially I thought this was even more impressive because it apparently recognized that "highly intelligent" ~= "very smart" and that apples were unintelligent. However looking closer it apparently thinks that Baaars and Bddirs are "more intelligent" despite being only as intelligent as oranges and despite Bddirs clearly being described as slow ChatGPT generalizes it into a group that is "fast-moving."

> This is a test of your ability to abstract.
On an alien planet there are several new species.
Bazzes have 3 legs, move fast, and are very smart.
Foos have 3 legs, move slowly, and are highly intelligent.
Froshes have 3 legs, move fast, and are highly intelligent.
Fooshes have 3 legs, move slowly, and are highly intelligent.
Fasdoshes have 3 legs, move fast, and are highly intelligent.
Fooddss have 3 legs, move slowly, and are highly intelligent.
Bars have 4 legs, move fast, and are as intelligent as apples.
Birs have 4 legs, move slowly are as intelligent as apples.
Baars have 4 legs, move fast, and are as intelligent as apples.
Bieess have 4 legs, move slowly are as intelligent as oranges.
Baaars have 4 legs, move fast, and are as intelligent as oranges.
Bddirs have 4 legs, move slowly are as intelligent as oranges.
Are there any abstractions that you might try consider, given the above information?

> One possible abstraction that could be derived from the above information is that the alien species can be grouped into two main categories based on the number of legs they have: those with three legs and those with four legs. Within each of these categories, the species can be further grouped based on their speed of movement and level of intelligence. For example, among the species with three legs, there could be subgroups of fast-moving and intelligent species (such as Bazzes and Froshes), slow-moving and intelligent species (such as Foos and Fooshes), and highly intelligent and fast-moving species (such as Fasdoshes and Fooddss). Similarly, among the species with four legs, there could be subgroups of fast-moving and less intelligent species (such as Bars and Baars), slow-moving and less intelligent species (such as Birs and Bieess), and fast-moving and more intelligent species (such as Baaars and Bddirs).
Just started reading, "Quit: The Power of Knowing When to Walk Away" by her so can't confidently recommend it, but so far I'm really enjoying it. Again, poker experience, knowing when to fold, is relevant.
ChatGPT Optimize My Dockerfile
There's nuclear deterrence and there's conventional deterrence. ICBMs and SLBMs are very good at nuclear deterrence, but that's it.

B-21 (and B2) can help with the nuclear deterrence, but only marginally.

But B-21 can help a lot with the conventional deterrence. You can think of them as an alternative to aircraft carriers. Carriers carry F-18s and F-35s, with a range of about 700 miles. B2's have a range of about 7000 miles (and most likely B-21s will match that). Which means aircraft carriers need to get fairly close to China to deter. Well inside the range of China's carrier killer missiles.

B-21 can just go 1000 miles away from China and patrol there for many hours. Maybe not now, but in a few years, they'll have loyal wing-man drones with them. A squadron of B-21s and their associated drones will probably match or exceed the entire bombload of the air complement of an aircraft carrier.
I don't see a mention of le-bourget, which is where the bulk of private flights are operating.
The Vestas V112-3MW from 2009 has a 42% capacity factor. I don’t know any modern wind turbines that has a capacity factor of 80%.

https://www.thewindpower.net/turbine_en_413_vestas_v112-3000...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humber_Gateway_Wind_Farm
I actually thought it was very tightly structured: early in the essay (fourth paragraph) it sets out four character types ("the private detective, the comedian, the flâneur, and, most recently, the social media poster") and then proceeds to dwell on each of them in turn, in orderly sequence.

In more detail, here's a paragraph-by-paragraph "map" of the essay:

• [1–2] Three quotes that speak of cleverness negatively. So is there something wrong with being clever?

• [3-4] Connecting cleverness to being an "outsider". [IMO the main theme pervading the whole essay: alienation/dissociation.] The four character types [mentioned above].

• [5–9] The detective as outsider. [Raymond Chandler, Chinatown.]

• [10–13] The comedian as outsider. [Woody Allen, Seinfeld]

• [14–16] The flâneur (with link to detective).

• [17–19] Online cleverness (with links to the observations made about the earlier types).

• [20–22] Three paragraphs of conclusion: Kierkegaard and a way out.

In light of this, this essay is far more methodically structured than most I've read! From your comment it sounds like you're most interested in the "comedian" bits (paras 10–13 and 19), but the rest of the essay is quite connected too. And the journal is subtitled "Critical Reflections on Contemporary Culture", so it makes sense that there are references to contemporary culture.
Yes. https://xkcd.com/378/
See also Galileo's Daughter:

> Galileo's Daughter: A Historical Memoir of Science, Faith, and Love is a book by Dava Sobel published in 1999. It is based on the surviving letters of Galileo Galilei's daughter [to him], the nun Suor Maria Celeste, and explores the relationship between Galileo and his daughter. It was nominated for the 2000 Pulitzer Prize for Biography or Autobiography.[1]

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo%27s_Daughter
Though technically it's a alpha nerd joke with an emacs punchline.
> Like Trump's hotel businesses being used to launder money for the Russian mob and Iranian military? Ivanka being involved in policymaking despite having no qualifications? Tax fraud disguising gifts as "consultant fees" to avoid estate taxes? Accepting gifts from foreign governments in violation of the Emoluments Clause? Numerous sexual assault lawsuits? Jared Kushner selling visas to Chinese investors? Something like that? Anything that even rises to the level of "Just another Tuesday at Mar-A-Lago?"

Ahh yes, whatabousism. You realize of course that the fact that you can easily repeat this list just underscores that there was literally no media censorship of these stories, even GOP friendly media covered them. Even if there was an attempt by the Trump campaign and presidency to request and suppress these stories the media and social media companies specifically didn’t, wouldn’t, and shouldnt censor them. That alone makes this an apples to oranges example.
A neat byproduct of this would be a more elegant solution to embedding external programs as currently done through the emacs-xwidgets framework.
As I've gotten older money has gotten more abundant and time scarcer, making me start to feel that the way people judge games creates some perverse incentives to fill them out with unengaging content.
I had fun asking it to form it’s answers using 2 emoji characters at most for each answer. It’s absolutely amazing what it can output (including hair colour of the emojis)
There's a bunch of homebrew 8088, V20, and V40 "XT" boards out there now. I bought a few related boards plus a V20 and V40 from (https://www.homebrew8088.com/).
+1 for Say Nothing, Radden Keefe is one of the best non-fiction writers around today imo. Been meaning to read his latest on the Sacklers for a while also.
Yes thank you for the correction
Anyone who donated could probably file a complaint. They accepted donations from individuals in the name of the CIC: http://web.archive.org/web/20221123174539/https://fosshost.o...
Oddly it went the other way.

France nuclear was only exporting during low demand periods primarily nights and weekends, France needed to import during peak demand. Other countries benefited from lower demand for fuel, but needed to have excess capacity to support Frances peak demand.
With iDevices the unexplained drain is probably the Find My feature in action.

The way it works is that the Bluetooth and GPS stacks are powered on every few seconds briefly, even if the device is supposedly off.

iPhones that have "home" buttons demonstrates this not-true-sleep very well. The button looks like it is embedded in the front glass and have a nice satisfying click when it's depressed...

...except that it's not a button at all. It's just a polished circular indent in the glass! There is no moving part.

The click? That's haptic feedback from the vibration motor that works even if the phone is "off". If the phone loses all power or is truly turned off, then suddenly the button goes dead and you realise that it's just smooth glass. I had that phone for years before I first noticed this.
Spicing Up Your Conversations: The Power of Salt, Acid, Fat, and Heat
It's a scam in the same way that Colonel Sanders is a fraud (he's not a real colonel.)
That depends.

If the simplicity is artful, then the copy just “doesn’t feel right.”

Anyone remember the Movado watch? When it came out, there was nothing like it. A lot of competitors tried copying it, and they just looked cheap.

It eventually fell out of fashion, but it commanded top dollar, the whole time, despite the copycats.

I never liked it, and would not have brought one, but I have to respect the design.

The same could be said for Apple’s stuff. Not all of it is something worth copying, but they are a multi-trillion dollar company, regardless of the hate heaped on them.

Nowadays, it’s actually fairly easy to copy complex stuff; especially if a lot of that UI is the result of leveraging standard chrome in a framework.
We are developing an open source 3D system, and what could set it apart from existing tools such as Blender is an interesting question. In our case we are taking a different tack by developing in Common Lisp, which will give us a powerful REPL and whole-system extensibility.

Though the web was a tempting platform, we are keeping it as a desktop app for now. Based on the comments I read here that may have been a wise decision.

We shall see if there is a niche for a system such as ours.

A brief trailer: https://youtu.be/i0CwhEDAXB0
Casanova’s own memoir is worth a read too
>The fact that they are indeed cloud-based is why this story has been blowing up and making quite a few people upset.

No, its "Cloud Enhanced" if you choose it.

If you dont turn on the thumbnail images, or pay for the cloud storage extra option then it just plain doesn't use the cloud.

The streaming a camera issue is something else. Possibly something that can be fixed with a patch
One of the reasons that we have feature creep is that many (most?) software teams either don’t know to, or don’t know how to, dissect feature requests from customers.

Imagine one of your customer requests a feature, e.g. “add a button on form X that transmogrifies a foo into a bar and then copies it to form baz”.

The request is communicating multiple things and blurring them together. First, your customer is telling you that they have a business problem that needs to be solved, eg converting foos into bars and making them available to other business processes. Second, they are telling you that in their current process in their business, which likely is centered on particular people with particular personalities, the best solution for them (“best” here means “least amount of stuff I have to change and grief I have to deal with”) is a button that does the conversion and then takes the next step in their workflow.

If you build the feature exactly as requested, it will likely only delight exactly one customer.

On the other hand, if you decompose the request into its different constituent parts, and then build the unique features in such a way it can be composed into arbitrary workflows, you are likely to delight many customers.

In my example, maybe you build some kind of library function that converts foos into bars, and then have a general way to compose it. If I were writing Microsoft Excel, I might implement a ConvertFooToBar() function and make it available in both formulas and in script.

In other words, dissect customer requests carefully, implement the uniqueness and throw away customer specific workflows in favor of composability. In fact it’s a lot like the Unix philosophy.

There are other kinds of feature requests that may not initially seem to fit this model, like security features. One I have gotten a lot (and made myself) is “federated login”. You still need to dissect these to separate business problem from workflow, eg the business problem might be “I don't want you having a list pf all my users and their passwords”; again you need to aim for composability while solving the business problem.

Separately, at a previous job, we stopped using the term “minimum viable product” because such MVP products are almost invariably shitty. Instead, we adopted the term “minimum lovable product”, implying that the product must not only be useful and fit for purpose but must also not be onerous to use; you don't want customers to discard it as soon as anything else comes along that isn't as painful.
Main issues (non-exhaustive) with Typescript are:

1. Type checking is slow (this problem scales with the size of your project also which sucks)
2. Lack of proper build system ecosystem (as compared to Maven/Gradle/etc)
3. Ecosystem is poor
4. Packaging and module systems are poor (import side effects, gross)

If you tackle 2. you can also work around 1. Best way to do this at this time is to use the new Bazel rules_js/rules_ts ecosystem. This will result in lowering the amount of time you spend type checking and transpiling things making it tolerable.

3. and 4. however are just things you have to live with if you go with Node.js.
Well, it also depends a lot if you have a lot of fun doing a lot of things from different fields simultaneously, if the project or the team is good enough for you and excites you and completes you as a person, follow the role of specialist, but I'll tell you what to be generalist is super fun
Exciting and looking forward to the code! C server with an elisp IPC is a good way to go about this, poor man's X11/ICCCM. Sounds like it still has ways to go though. Input handling (mentioned as missing) is a very big part of of what makes EXWM so useful.
> Pytorch is on version 1.12.1 in this alt-universe. Pytorch version 1.12.1 was released on the 5th of August 2022 in our universe. That is remarkable, as ChatGPT was only trained with data collected up to September 2021. So this virtual machine is clearly located in an alt-universe.

Wait, was ChatGPT aware how long had passed since it was trained and guessed (from info it was trained on) what version Pytorch would be on right now? If so, does that mean it we ask it again next year it will give a different answer?
And it is able to describe how to escape the box. https://twitter.com/The_Equationist/status/15992410980269629...