skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What a great comment! You’ve perfectly identified a big value point of Codux and have described it even better than I would :) (I’m Omer from Codux Product team). Our designers are already using Codux to manage styles and component structures, as we’re obviously building Codux within Codux.

Regarding some kind of a mash with Figma - even though we are looking at some possible ways of better synch between the tools in the future, the short answer is ‘not yet’. Even though design tools’ capabilities are getting highly advanced, they still have (and probably always have) unbridged gaps from real front-end development concerns, as you describe here.
You can obviously keep Figma in your process while still working with Codux, but we’re here to help you build & maintain front-end code visually, in collaboration with designers, but on top of the real thing.
If you mean OAuth, they've added it earlier this year.
Conveniently, I have worked both in a publishing firm with a catalogue of several million books and in a health firm and am neck-deep in translating algorithmic coverage systems into someone else’s algorithmic coverage system. Please allow me to bloviate:

It is logically complicated far and beyond ordering a book.

Understanding what is even needed for billing up-front isn’t possible in all cases. What happens when you have extra bleeding during a procedure and now need additional units of blood and associated equipment and care? How do you bill this in advance?

Then, we have “medically necessary” issues. Your insurance may cover an issue if it is medically necessary, but it often isn’t clear if it is or isn’t until game-day. Then what? Or, of course, the hospital and insurer may have different professionals engaged in a spirited debate over whether or not a given piece of academic literature supports or denies the necessity of a procedure. So there we have an issue that isn’t algorithmic at all (a human debate!)

Then we have all kinds of other fun issues, like the coding being a living document. The AMA regularly “refactors” coding as the medical world evolves. What was billed yesterday as one code may become two or three different items each with their own conditions applied. Except the old code is still supported as well so now someone has to go back and sus out the discrepancy between the ordering provider and the insurance payer.

So, for very rote procedures it actually is easy to give flat rates and solid estimates. I have a local Doc-in-a-Box facility that offers a flat-rate $90 service for a standard visit which even includes things like x-rays and steroid shots. When I went in with a stomach bug and needed some add-ons it was a simple piece-sheet line item as you wish.

BUT! The world isn’t this simple, medicine is a very complex practice, and so we can’t simply estimate a price out-of-the-gate.

As an exercise, think to yourself - my friend walked up and asked me to make his awesome Facebook-for-Cats app. Well, please provide me an exact billing of what you will need in terms of time and cost. If you’re now thinking “well shoot, what features does he need?” You’ve now founded yourself in a bounded-but-open question. These also happen in medicine and are why “just give me the number” isn’t easy.
I saw a tweet today saying that using ChatGPT as a search engine is epistemological equivalent of consuming food as a human centipede.
I doubt this ban will succeed. Automation makes the production cost fall close to zero, while the detection cost remains relatibely high.

More ardent reputation based vetting could occur, but that would also impact genuine new contribitors and cut of the inflow of those while further boosting an already bolstered activist gatekeeper contingent on the platform scaring of well intentioned fresh posters.
Yeah, it definitely gets me thinking about how powerful it would be if they can ever get a version that can return correct answers for questions in a broad variety of fields.

It feels like something adjacent to Google, but different. On a search engine, I am asking an algorithm to return web pages generally written by humans that have some relationship to my query.

But with ChatGPT I start to get the sense for what it would be like to be talking to an expert in whatever field relates to my query. A system like this that can embody real expertise would be amazing.
Aren't the people running the servers and services, playing arbiter in fights, removing spam and illegal stuff on WP payed? I imagine there's quite some "stressful work" being done for and on WP that is still unpaid and voluntary.
Depends what you want out of them I guess. I buy these because I want a phone that doesn't break easily. And CAT phones don't. It's slow, the camera is crap, the speaker is worse; but what sucks more is replacing the screen every couple of months because it breaks from a stiff breeze.

I will drop my phone. It'll fall out of my pocket. I will sit on it. Sometimes it will land on a hard surface. It'll get wet. It'll get muddy. It'll get unceremoniously tossed in my gym bag. All these things happen. With most phones, this means I have to replace the screen if not the phone. With a CAT, there's no noticeable effect at all.

I also really like how heavy and sturdy they are. Makes them easier to find. Battery life is also amazing. Mine is down to needing charging every two days now after a couple of years. My girlfriend's similar-aged flagship Samsung needs a filler-upper in the afternoon to make a full day.

Anyway CAT matches what I want in a phone. This isn't for everyone, but let's not pretend nobody wants a phone that is sturdy and basic. Because I really do.
The history of baseball is rounders, a game popular among children in Great Britain and Ireland
so what exactly is the difference between binaries and scripts executing arbitrary system calls?
That is categorically false, the model does hallucinate but it absolutely expresses uncertainty about things.
Twitter Files Supplemental
Structured Concurrency in Java with Loom
Yep and experts are especially good at this. ChatGPT behaves like an over confident teenager who just read one paragraph about your question and now thinks they know everything about the subject.
France’s Mr. Privacy turns cybersnooper
Just use airplane mode. I use it all the time, for this purpose exactly. Sometimes I am just not available - people have to accept that.
DEX crypto-to-fiat offramp: Looking for feedback
On-ramping (converting fiat to crypto) and off-ramping (converting crypto to fiat) have been monopolized by centralized exchanges (aka CEXes).

In our view, CEXes are antithetical to the core tenets of crypto:

1. Custodial wallets: Users have no control over their crypto stored in CEX wallets.
2. KYC blackbox: Users have no control over their personal details stored by the CEX.
3. Unilateral power: Users have no control over their rights to access a CEX’s application.

We're buidling offramp.xyz, a DEX offramp to solve this:

Offramping is done entirely peer-to-peer. Buyers and sellers may broadcast their offers for any amount of time, crypto / fiat denomination, network, and price. Accepting offers is purely at the discretion of both parties.

Both sides of the offramp are secured by dual-linked escrow smart contracts utilizing Chainlink as an oracle. The smart contracts execute such that crypto and fiat are released to the corresponding sides of the offramp at the same time.

We plan to have users self-execute KYC on a commercial compliance platform. Users that are cleared (verified through a Chainlink oracle) will be granted a soulbound NFT linked to their non-custodial wallet, enabling them anonymous access. Wallets connecting to the dApp are screened by Chainalysis to see if they're on sanction lists. The soulbound NFT will automatically lock the beneficiary name written on the fiat smart contract to the same name that was cleared during KYC.

No KYC information is stored by Offramp.

Result - Users can anonymously trade fiat<>crypto from their self-owned wallets, without supervision, while knowing other participants are not sanctioned individuals/entities.
This isn't usable yet, but in active development by the author, and looks promising: https://jank-lang.org/
Shapiro: A Datalog Materialization Toolkit
magic numbers are vital for filesystem reference in kernel code to distinguish load order of partitions in a disk, and probably used for memory allocation, and permissions. The reason why the magic code exists among code itself seems a little redundant with type checking and garbage collection or proper inheritance.
If ChatGPT responses were reliably correct this would be true. Otherwise it’s just going to cause more confusion.
We can see it in action in the last LTT video on youtube. It is pretty wild
You can just order body parts from Lenovo (true, probably not for t420 anymore) or third party resellers, or just take them from another one.

And there are a lot of Thinkpad service partners stores, mainly for business customers, I bring around 1-3 Thinkpads a month there for repair (we have ours close by).
TaigaNext is Angular 14 right now, we're working on a private GitHub repo that will be public soon.
I usually pack some snacks or just buy something small for first dinner and breakfast, only later go to do proper shopping.
> when this wonderful work will be merged into the mainline kernel

Last year, they already merged part of their work:
https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/09/asahi_linux_merged/

But I haven't seen anything since. It's the stated goal, though.
They were reviewing a project, not a diff.
I'm not the person you're replying to, but I've used a similar pattern, and there are a couple of reasons.

First, if you have lots of databases and other applications, then you are talking about a mesh of event busses - which defeats the purpose. Pushing the messages out of the various databases and into a central message bus makes the messages more easily consumable without having to know where they come from.

Second, by writing messages to a PG table first, those messages become part of the update transaction. This means you can post messages at any time during your business logic processing, but if you hit an error and roll back, those messages (which would, presumably, no longer be valid) are also rolled back.

Combine this with message idempotence and you get a very reliable messaging environment.
I'm getting better (pre digested?) results for technical questions than google ever could. Last night it helped me with my redis replication info question, giving me the right commands to run.
Actually it looks like it has a binary cutoff instead of human like uncertainty. When you ask a hard question it says that it's just a text model not able to answer.
Effective taxation in a country that's suffering heavily from tax evasion. Fighting fraud more effectively.

I can't think of any other pleasant idea. It all boils down to applied surveillance.
This is one of the most obviously false arguments in this domain and yet it is repeated often.

You don’t only have two eyes, you have a general intelligence which is far superior to anything that Tesla or anyone else has developed as a control system. The deficiency of the control system compared to a human brain means the sensors need to be significantly superior to anything that humans have in order to build an equivalent map of the world.
Oh lots of reasons, just hypothetically here are some completely random examples:

- Hook up GPT-2 into a voice synthesizer, stable diffusion and your toy and fuck an AI
- You can sync toy vibration to the thrusts in a porno as detected by an beat detection algorithm
- You can add toy vibration as an interactivity dimension in a lewd VR game.
Not accessible breaker box sounds extremely dangerous and illegal.
“Better aesthetics” is an entirely subjective judgement.

Agree about being able to swap components though.
AFAIK Russia has left sci-hub alone. Good for them!
They can but:

- it's more time-consuming to create good evaluation questions.

- it's more time-consuming to provide a nuanced answer.

- it's more time-consuming to evaluate nuanced answers.

If the purpose of the tests is to help students retain the knowledge they've been recently exposed to, then the first kind of tests are more effective. That is, the teacher will be able to provide students with more tests, thus helping them retain more in a shorter amount of time for everyone.

It's a compromise.
Boeing designed the plane to be easily convertible to a freighter because they expected the market for subsonic passenger travel to vanish during its lifetime. Sadly they didn’t get that one right but helps explain why it has done quite well as a freighter. For example the hump allows it to be loaded from the nose.
I don't think OP is saying that all hardware must have thorough documentation before it can legally be released. Instead, they're claiming Apple already has some documentation internally, and it costs them nothing to release it.
Handling Entire API Lifecycle from 1 place
Or you could just open source it.
WIth the current state of software it makes most sense to have each project live in a container / vm. Including all dependencies, and visual code.

Unfortunately using visualcode server isn't safe enough either.

Something like qubes seems to be the future.. or present if you're running it :-)
China was the leader in the push to pure cashless society. Cash still works, but only in small amounts.

Lots of HNews'ers claim cash is the only way to keep your freedoms, but that simply glosses over the fact that even if you have piles of cash under your bed, you can't do anything meaningful if the government decides to prevent/limit banks from accepting cash deposits - say in a 5 year timeframe.

After a while, businesses will simply stop accepting cash.
How do you kill something respectfully? Bow before you shoot it in the head? And why would that matter?

"Unnecessary" is a value judgement made by you, not an objective property of their death. They died for the purpose of furthering science and medical research – many people would consider that necessary even if fewer mistakes could've been made.
This was far more entertaining to read than you probably intended. I find your ideas intr.... yeah that.
You can. First, you don't always need to type all this (is that a CCL or LispWorks prompt?). In SBCL, use only the restart number: "0". In your editor, use "q".

In SBCL, you can disable the interactive debugger. Put this in your .sbclrc:

(defun print-condition-hook (condition hook)
"Print this error message (condition) and abort the current operation."
(declare (ignore hook))
(princ condition)
(clear-input)
(abort))

(setf *debugger-hook* #'print-condition-hook)

It only prints the error messages. It could be useful when experimenting with a bare-bones REPL on the terminal. For that purpose, see also sbcli and cl-repl on Github.
Look at you with your ability to downvote
German police arrest 25 suspects in plot to overthrow state
As OTA updates would be signed just like regular updates, can you detail how they would make Bluetooth less secure than USB ?
> there's no Apple Store for thinkpad repairs

I pay around 50USD/year for an enterprise grade Thinkpad support plan with Lenovo, where they send an engineer to either my home or office the _next day_, complete with any spare parts needed to fix whatever might have gone wrong, whether it's accidental damage or a hardware defect. I've only needed that support maybe four or five times over the last decade, but each time it's been stellar: new screens, mainboards, keyboards, broken case parts, etc. No caveats or gotchas or 'ooh that voids your warranty' to worry about, ever. It gave me full confidence to run my company and equip all of my devs with Thinkpads that run on Fedora - so much so, that when we were acquired a couple of years ago, my only negotiating condition that caused a stir was the requirement that me and my team get to keep our Linux+ThinkPad stack.

What I just described is the polar opposite to every experience I've ever had with anything to do with Apple, ranging from the genius bar arguments to the six week waits to fix our designer's spacebar that stopped working because someone dropped a a breadcrumb in there. It just doesn't compare.

Side notes relevant to your comment:

- the T420 that you mention is now an 11 year-old piece of hardware, I don't understand why you're referencing it

- even so, plastic gets brittle over time. I don't know anyone with a 10+ year old MacBook that still runs

- iFixit are heavily biased, or at least they were when the T420 came out (it's in the iName)

- with all that said I still can't wait to be able to use a fanless desktop M2 as my daily driver (@LinaAsahi you're awesome)
I personally think they're good-looking, they diverge from Apple's traditional "ultra-sleek form over function" design style and enter the area of a somewhat industrial look IMO. They can be described as boring, but they're not exactly eye-sores. But this is clearly subjective. Personally, I don't buy computers based on looks, as long as they don't look like those gnarly "gaming"-branded products.

The keyboards though? I've had a range of laptops, some Dells, some HPs, a 2021 MacBook Pro and a 2011 MacBook Pro, I would simply describe the keyboard as "meh". Most of the laptops O've had have been slightly less comfortable to type on, but they've all essentially done the job (with the exception of one Dell which had a truly terrible keyboard).

No offence, but it looks like you feel the need to describe everything as either "terrible" or "amazing", the keyboards can't just be "not as good as they should", they have to "suck", the externals can't just be "boring", they have to be "awful". I think there's a version of what you're saying which people would agree with (or at least find unobjectionable), but as it is, nobody will agree with you that an objectively average laptop keyboard "sucks" or that an aesthetic lots of (most?) people like is "ugly".
> …the jump would be from a machine operator to a software engineer/automation engineer. While this are certainly all teachable skills, they require an extremely different skill profile than the ones they're replacing.

They're not though. You need higher intelligence to be a software engineer, compared to a machine operator in most manufacturing plants.

Certain jobs are simply out of reach for most people.

It's not controversial that in the 18-century logging wood was out of reach for some people for lack of strength. But somehow it's controversial to admit that certain modern jobs are out of reach because of lack of intelligence.
The remaining 10% are the mac, I suppose? It's one of the better things about macs, and has been working mostly flawlessly for at least 15 years, strange that the other platforms still struggle with it.
Tangential (doesn't directly address or refute your point), but I found it interesting that while most of this bill's sponsors are Democrats, three of the (5?) Republican sponsors, Kennedy, Graham and Collins, also voted in favor of the 2nd railroad worker related bill which would have mandated paid sick leave. Almost every Democrat in both houses also voted for that bill, and almost no Republicans did; it ultimately failed as it couldn't overcome a Senate filibuster. Almost as notable is that Manchin is a sponsor of this bill but was the sole Democrat in the Senate to vote down paid sick leave.
This google search[0] will provide a list of interesting papers about piracy.

They seem generally to support what I think is something like the majority consensus here:

- piracy does some harm to sales, especially of new books, but can increase consumer knowledge and therefor increase diversity of sales and sales of older works: "effect of piracy is heterogeneous: piracy decreased the
legitimate sales of ongoing comics, whereas increased the legitimate sales of completed comics. The latter result is interpreted as follows: piracy reminds consumers of past comics and stimulates sales in that market." [1]

- piracy does considerable harm to large institutes (but largely seen as a good thing)

- for sales, a lot of the lost revenue seems to be made up for "increases the demand for complements to protected works, raising, for instance, the demand for concerts and concert prices"

- that DRM creates fake scarcity where none should exist-- distribution costs are now zero, we shouldn't pretend that we still need to pay so much for books and music

- how to make sure artists still have a revenue stream needed to exist is definitely still a problem, but it is not one that is solved by crushing pirate libraries

Also further discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33460970 (517 comments, recent)

And, to the person down below who wants to help out, check out the further discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=annas-blog.org (>1000 comments over six submissions)

[0]: https://www.google.com/search?q=site:gwern.net+piracy

[1]: https://www.gwern.net/docs/economics/copyright/2019-tanaka.p...

[2]: https://www.gwern.net/docs/economics/copyright/2010-oberholz...

EDIT: formatting
ai wrote this ^
you could say that about literally any law. should we just not have laws then, lest there be unintended consequences?
There's no "overall" or "finally" line
Well, in the past we did the same but with Google's search results. Now the search engine has become so bad, bloated and spammed, that we use ChatGPT instead.

Enjoy it while it lasts, it'll be only a matter of time before advertisements and 'SEO' tricks make their way into large language models.
Of those aircraft, the upper lobe of the 707, 727, 737 and 757 is the same. There's a lot of history still being carried over into aircraft manufactured today.
> and there's no Apple Store for thinkpad repairs.

But a widespread network of service companies that will happily fix your devices, in most places way denser then the network of apple stores. (Not to mention providing on-site warranty services)
“Ugly” and “suck” are highly subjective and depend on people’s personal tastes. You could say that MacBooks are terrible for upgradeability but “keyboards suck” is pretty generic.

Older MacBooks did have issues but Apple generally delivered on what most mac users wanted.
To be fair to IT teams, it normally SOC that drag their heels on software approvals.
They should do it, but I doubt it would cost them nothing. That internal documentation is almost certainly not fit for external consumption and would need to be reviewed and rewritten in places.
with the mods: how do you start that process at all?

the steam engine is the only (early) way to produce electricity, and the pump needs electric, and the steam engine needss water

(I tried googling for the mod but came up short)
They already pulled it off for their previous device, the Nano X (and S+, which shares the same secure element with the new Stax device)
That was exactly what I was expecting given the source and the title
Awesome! There is a whole world of Bluetooth devices waiting out there!

Some suffer from broken or outdated Android apps like my Eurochron A620 bluetooth thermometer - the only way to make it work on a modern Android version is to hack it like the OP did. (If only old apps would make their source code publicly available...)

So this article is very much appreciated.
> My understanding is that most compilers can out-optimise the average developer

Do you happen to know where (what source) you got that from? I'm genuinely curious, as to my knowledge, compilers are generally still easily fooled by things that causes them unable to vectorize code or factor out conditional jumps.

To give an example here, see Mike Actons' talk below (from about 43:10 onwards) in which he describes the compiler failures.

https://youtu.be/rX0ItVEVjHc?t=2590
see my comment above, TL;DR if you have 32TB spare and an internet connection, you can have your own Library of Alexandria in your living room.