skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Every TLS library will also have to implement it.

I hate to say it but... I want a systemd-certd that TLS libraries can call into saying 'verify this please' and then the logic for verifying trust path, validity, revocation status etc can be done in one place, consistently and correctly.
No worries.

Having been forced to read the various filings by this company, it makes me angry that it could one day be in people's retirement index funds. How that is even possible is worthy of many cynical and potentially paranoid thoughts :)
Interestingly, arguably THE most agile company in the world (Spacex) probably doesn't use any ALM tools as supported by the agile industry. Maybe a backlog tool in there somewhere, but I bet their bullshit footprint is pretty light.
> I always want to ask them why they cannot afford a Lamborghini or live in a giant mansion

Do you lack any critical thinking ability whatsoever? Or do you have a need to be in peoples’ business?
> tried to turn it over to the FBI twice but the FBI declined. That's when they turned it over to Giuliani who sent them to the NY Post.

This is not quite accurate. The FBI did take the laptop, but Isaac (the repairman) made a copy and sent it to Rudy Giuliani as some sort so assurance because he feared the laptop would be black holed by the FBI.
Probably also worth consulting with someone in their 50s that hasn't had kids. Having kids when you have an active social life seems like everything grinds to a half. NOT having kids when everyone you used to hang out with does is suddenly busy, on the other hand, is its own can of worms. At different age brackets, "normal social life" tends to look different -- and it varies by class and geography as well.
I'll add to the Amazon interview complaints (early 2021 so remote). The recruiter prepped me ahead of time that I would have only 4 interviewers, and the next day they would be sending me an approval or some feedback. Having done interviews before I knew this was nonsense, and sure enough 2 or 3 days after my five calls, he called back genuinely surprised that there was no feedback. The interview itself was genuinely interesting but complicated by this team not having hired a frontend eng before.
The first baby is exhausting. The second one feels easy. The nervous stress that you'll break something is gone and replaced with "been there, done that". Which is really fortunate because the older one can run and climb now so you'll need that time back.
The fees won't be as big a change as businesses being able to pay higher salaries from the savings.
No disagreement there, although I think perhaps society should stop treating children as crops to be harvested for the commons. A tragedy of the commons has been created as society claims social security tax from grown children to pay to the elderly, so the economic incentive is to be a free-rider and live off other people's children while having none of your own.
Do you think it would addressed under destroy wealth and neglect themselves? lol What are you even saying?

I was just trying to say that as the proportion of retired people increases they will take more resources and that will mean fewer resources for /anything/ else.
This is basically my own experience as well.
I'm not an architect at the moment but when I have been I spent most of my time negotiating with stakeholders to work out what they really need rather than just planning what ridiculous nonsense they believed they wanted.
I wasn’t jesting - I was hoping. So your comment sparks joy.
To translate it to a more common sentiment: "we'd like to have kids, but don't feel stable enough" or "we would have kids, but can't afford a house"
Hey Thomas.

Yes! The key here is the failover to English Common Law: if something breaks the failover is binding arbitration with a technically sophisticated arbitrator who will come in, figure out who owns what, make the awards, job done. Obviously that's minimal protection if (for example) somebody has their cryptocurrency stolen and it's just gone - but ownership of the physical property isn't subject to those kinds of misfortunes. It's 100% under law, as you would expect!
It's funny because in my family everyone has kids. The reason being it's the only way to move out of your parents home because we don't have rich parents and no one's buying a home and affording a kid with a working class job.

> Babies are a huge opportunity cost. Financially speaking, they are like winning the lottery but backwards.

I can only assume OP is talking about people who work here? Here in the UK if you don't work you're fast-tracked a home for having a kid and if you have a few you're generally given a very nice 3 bed house so I'm not sure this applies generally. Typically you're very poor you're much better off for having a kid here.

I'd personally love a kid or two or three. My girlfriend too. And it upsets me deeply that I'll probably never be able to afford to have one. It's just so hard to afford a home, taxes, bills, student loans and all the costs of a kid on top of that. I've considered just giving up and going on benefits more times than I care to admit, but I think we both agree that wouldn't be the life we want either.

I don't want support, but the one thing that annoys me is how I know pensioners living in 5 bed homes who are receiving state pensions which unlike my salary goes up in line with inflation, while receiving help for energy bills and getting a host of other perks like discounted bus tickets, etc.

The fact the only people I know with homes are 60+ or on benefits seems weird and deeply immoral to me. Literally all my friends who work are in their 30s and living with there parents while my sister is a single mum in her 20s and somehow has her own house and a BMW (also partly given to her by the government). If we care to solve the birth rate problem it seems to me prioritising homes and resources for working families instead of the unemployed and pensioners would be the way to go.

Sorry for ranting, and I know I've brought this up before. But I feel this is the most important issue of my generation and no one is seriously discussing it. Happy to receive insults about how I don't care about the elderly and poor people now.
It's normally a dozen or two animals per product. It's usually 2-4 years to develop a device and get it cleared, an animal or two a month. Not anywhere close to 1500, this is criminal.
This is incorrect, they just stole customer funds. They could do that without issuing a token.
We grew up poor in the US. We worked hard in school and had above average to excellent test scores. Being poor does not directly support bad test scores or whether society can or should bear the burden of UBI.

Conflating growing up poor with growing up with abuse is incorrect.
> He comes off as obsequious and uninformed. It's bizarre.
He's also somewhat self aggrandizing.

Sounds like every venture capitalist to me. Most of them got lucky selling some random software company to Yahoo or some analogous route or riding the biggest tech and stock boom in history but come out thinking they’re oracles and literally better than everyone else. Couple that with cult of personality and the worship they get.
The headline relies on a definition of "cost" I do not accept.

Cities will get less tax income, sure, but their outlay is also less. Their actual costs could be radically reduced by changing zoning laws to enable residents to live near their place of employment.
That was my though as well.

Without touching the inequalities / corruption aspect, it would be closer to a research grant than a Universal basic income the way it is set up.

Then again, it's bloomberg.
To me, break implies it was chosen for personal reasons. But I'll let GP answer for sure.
ok, well one obvious reason would be environmental effects of being raised by idiots without money.
> Oh and that I'll have a partner who will stay healthy (and loyal)...

The LVB (lowest viable bar) is "will I be able to have a civil conversation with this person about our child whenever needed, for at least 20 years?"

People get so bitterly disappointed when "unconditional love" doesn't happen, they can't even meet the LVB. Keep LVB front and center when evaluating a potential mate. If the answer is "yes, no matter what happens, we can always be civil about the children", then no matter what, it should be okay.
Hmm, perhaps robots.txt semantics needs to be extended to signify “OK to crawl for a search database but not as a training set”.
I guess this is TSMCs getaway if things will get sour with China.
It really depends, because children force us to negotiate.

Babies are dead easy. They are incapable of expressing their will. You put them in a stroller, that baby is in the stroller. Yes, you have to feed and clean the baby and it will sometimes be hard to wrangle into whatever situation you want. But it doesn't have a choice ultimately.

Adults are also relatively easy. You don't have to do any of the cleaning or feeding, and you also don't have to tolerate anything you don't want to. Bob is being a jerk? Fuck him. Sally doesn't come to your birthday party? Well, now she's not invited to Friendsgiving. Etc.

Toddlers who grow into children who grow into teenagers are a whole category unto themselves. You slowly divest yourself of the cleaning and direct feeding duties. But you also can't just abandon them. When little Billy is pitching a fit, you have to deal with that. And as they get older and get savvier themselves, you're going to have to navigate that. You are going to have a lot of responsibility with decreasing levels of authority.

So now you have to get your kid to do what you would like for them to do without physical coercion. Ideally without much coercion if you want to preserve a relationship with them. You are going to have to convince them. And you aren't allowed to quit.
Ask HN: Could we make the Gmail Promotions tab more usable?
In the course of brainstorming about a product, I've been forced to check out my Gmail Promotions tab.

I normally avoid it as I find it too noisy -- filled with repeat emails from brands that I don't care about. It feels like too much work personally to unsubscribe from all irrelevant senders. And yet, while browsing it, I did notice a lot of latent value in relevant deals and discounts.

Would any UX changes unlock value from this tab? Some that come to mind include:

1) Better UI to declare which brands I care about.

2) Order messages based on promotional value rather than date received (admittedly weird for the email context)

3) User controls for how many messages received per brand per time interval.

4) Option to automatically unsubscribe if user does not respond to N messages from a given brand.

5) Rules to filter out deals / discounts that do not clear a specified threshold (i.e. save at least $20).
This is a dangerous rhetorical maneuver, though, because it:

1. Accepts the existence and influence of social-media-induced illness:

2. Does not rigorously define the condition, it's symptoms, scope or mechanism:

3. Therefore, leaving us free to apply it to gender identity or really, anything at all.

Trumpism? SMII. Wokeness? SMII. Pro-union sentiment? You're not gonna believe this, also a SMII.

And once you call something a "disease" the implication is that it should be "cured" which gets scary quick.
Isn't that insane? Christmas has taken on a totally new sheen for me. I've fallen in love with it again. I remember my dad saying something to that effect when I was a kid, and I asked him if he was excited about presents. He said he was more excited to see us enjoy Christmas, and I could not fathom what he was talking about. Now I'm exploding with excitement about future Christmases with this kid.
When I was 19, with childhood bullying issues at school and with my stepmother, low self esteem, parents separated when I was three months old, I realized I was not somebody who could have a family.

I just don't have the confidence, I don't have the friend network, and I'm just unable to deal with dating women with all the mixed messages and how women have internalized misogyny and sexism, which often makes relationships difficult. I support feminism, but I don't have the emotional intelligence to handle the problems women go through.

It's not that I don't want a family, it's mostly that I don't care.
this might pick up even more given the VMware/Broadcom acquisition, so you are likely good
Hopefully!

Keep in mind that other alternatives are possible, including “St. Louis and Detroit in the 80s-2000s” style downward spiral into blight.

I have no interest in bailing out billion dollar property holding companies, but we need to do everything possible to encourage positive development. It does seem like many cities get it, the high line in particular seems to have spawned a dozen imitators which is awesome.
What Is a Black Start of the Power Grid?
There is no need to "solve" every change.
> One thing I noticed (although small sample set) was that the interview processes are very slow (like 1 round per week).

Yep. And almost everyone is hiring by committee now. Because if the committee hires the wrong person, nobody hires the wrong person.

And with all of these people involved, now you are subject to the calendars of the various very busy “stakeholders”. One company I engaged with had me talk to 11 people between individual interviews and panel interviews. That’s 11 calendars to coordinate, with illness and PTO and holidays and on and on to sort through.

I had one situation where I had to wait two weeks for one of the interviewers to have a spot open on their calendar. “She is so busy”, I was assured. They eventually extended an offer, but this and other warning signs made it clear it wasn’t a fit, so I respectfully declined.
Here is a snippet, the history and development of complexity theory's major themes from the 1950s to the present.

https://www.art-sciencefactory.com/complexity-map_feb09.html

Any field that doesn't evolve dries up as "solved" and boring. As an example, no one researches calculus anymore, they research measure theory, category theory, and other derived fields. Things evolve in an environment fostering free and liberal exploration.

The solution to liking a particular set of dogma isn't to create alternative universities (e.g. Liberty U, BYU, Austin U) but rather to test the predictability of the dogma.
If I ended up at Google I'd probably keep my head way down, only showing up and getting the work done because everything about it seems like a toxic work environment these days.

But I can't help but think it's worth leveraging an offer like that, if not only as a favor to your future self. Go in planning to work for like a year, near the end start looking for a jobs and I have a feeling there will be a ton of companies drooling at someone wanting to leave Google for them.

But you do you!
This is a good analogy because parenthood is singular and profound. One of the few things for which is no replacement or equivalent experience.
These are not mice, and there are much, much higher standards for animal experiments on e.g. primates. The expense and amount of effort per animal is also very different for monkeys compared to mice.
My country is lower income than the Netherlands and Germany. 70k is upper management money here and a bit more than what I make.

I have talked to some companies in Ireland and the UK in the last few months, and their ranges usually start at 80/90k. The most famous example is probably Google. Entry level (L3) is 100k-ish and L4 starts at ~120k. Even if OP was placed at a below average level for someone with 15 YoE, they should be getting 150k+ offers.
I did some hands-on contract work last 10 months but the rest was "no work" yeah. So 3+ years of being out of a full-time role.
I feel it’s almost a shame he isn’t utilizing his intellect and thoughtfulness in a domain more obviously useful for humanity, but he might have just gone to sell ads for a FAANG if he weren’t a crypto pioneer.

Also, even as someone who’s dabbled in the space and found it lacking in many areas, I can’t say with any degree of certainty that there’s no future in his particular flavor of the blockchain technology.
And there is no evidence a basic income would have altered that trajectory.

People with a particular drive are the ones who find a way.

There are smart people out there but a lot of them get into boring jobs because they are easy. They don’t particularly like difficult exploration.

Will some opportunities have been missed? Yes, but that’s life. Nature isn’t about maximizing everything.
Sure. But in vast tracts of the world - UK, US, many other jurisdictions in the G20, and even more in poorer countries - land registers are a mess and transfers are hard.
Walk me through that thinking?

Downtown residents walk and use transit. Places with broader distribution of people typically rely on roads because transit isn’t economically efficient.

My intuition is that higher population densities are more environmentally efficient because more people can be served by any resource. Are you thinking otherwise?
City downtown or small town downtown? This sounds like city-downtown.

Traditional "downtown" America was killed or mortally wounded by Walmart many years ago. In fact, the town I grew up in got a Walmart in the mid-90's and now it has a robust stretch of highway with every "big box" vendor. Guess what happened to the quant brick building downtown that used to have every store one could need? The town I would bike around every day, meet my friends and where my mom and her peers worked? Dead. It's now a mishmash of crap stores and empty storefronts despite hosting a decent college.
Good answer...
Plenty of people on the right do not support walker et al. The right isn’t any more of a monolith than the left.

Absolutely they’d support tax incentives for married couples.

As for stronger social safety nets decreasing crime, sounds good. And yet, the claim I’ve read is that in the USA increases to this have not correlated with improved outcomes to eg household wealth among black Americans (since the 60s). Of course we have a complex system here so hard to make any conclusions.
> sociopathic personality

He seems pretty down-to-ground to me, personally, especially compared to other people of similar wealth. What actions/behavior of his make you think he's sociopathic?

> too much capital

I personally agree, but this is still a subjective opinion, not a real criticism. The more general implication of this is that there is such a thing as "too much capital", in which case we need to draw the line - at which point exactly capital becomes too much? A million dollars? A billion?

> brittle long-termism agenda

Brittle or not, arguing that Elon cares only about long term is factually false - he already delivered many things, including Tesla electric cars and Starlink internet service, which are useful here and now.
You don't have to lie if you're unemployed during both of the interviews and then accept two offers simultaneously.
> In all these instances, the answer is litigation under the terms of service which are associated with the NFT or the warranty contracts which guarantee the status of the property.

Terms of what service? Who's providing it? Why would anybody downstream from the first buyer be held to them?

What if a third party uses an exploit to transfer the NFT from the original owner to me, a randomly picked and non-participating address? How can I be bound to any terms of service or contract by just receiving a random NFT?

> You bring a case under those terms: "I am the legal owner of this land and I want the NFT which was owned by the deceased to be reissued to me". The legal binding on the original NFT is broken, and a new NFT is issued.

What if the issuer no longer exists?

> We feel that's very powerful.

I take this message is an implicit "No, it hasn't been tested legally". You might hope it works, but who in their right mind would spent more than a million to find out for sure?
"The problem I have with this discussion is it pretends to treat animal welfare as an absolute"

I don't see, where I did this. I clearly stated that I eat meat and I know that this means animal suffering. It is all about the relative suffering to me aka avoiding unnecessary suffering or finding better ways (simulations) wherever possible.

"but I am certain that this is a long long /long/ way from the worst example of this. "

And there surely are worse examples. So what? This is about this concrete example. Unnecessary animal suffering to meet some arbitary deadlines. Not to save the world from a pandemic or alike.

"This research has a very high expected return, and it can't be done in simpler organisms."

My question would be, why not use humans? At what point would the "very high expected return" justify this? Never? Why not?

Apes are indeed quite close to us (so are pigs) and I think drawing a line along "with that species really anything is allowed as they cannot speak" to "they can speak, we have to take every caution with them" is just strange to me, or rather plain wrong.

So to be clear, I never said animal testing is never allright. But I do think the reasoning of "anything is allowed with animals" is very wrong.
I’m creating a startup. I’m the first and only employee, and likely to remain that way for the foreseeable future.

What would have taken an army of clerks in the past is now a (lot) of code. Whole departments are replaced by API’s that cost less than $100/month.

It’s really incredible.
You chopped the one statement into different "parts". Here is the comment in question:

> For the last several decades society put massive pressure on kids to conform to heteronormativity. With these pressures lessening more and more people are feeling empowered to explore their sexuality.

In a maximally generous interpretation, you could say that the "kids" in the first half and the "people" in the second half of the statement are completely different subjects. I think that is a bit of a stretch, though.

"For years I have been pruning the tomato plants in my garden. Now, I just let the _plants_ grow".

Anyone reading that would assume "plants" refers to the aforementioned tomato plants, not cucumbers.
I think it actually increases assimilation with the US instead. One of the things that improved US relations with Japan when there was fear that they would take over the US was when they started building a bunch of US-based manufacturing.
Me too (work in the space). My issue is the quantity of animals they thought they needed, I've never seen more than a dozen or two needed for an entire medical device program, drugs may need more, but for devices this is a staggeringly high number.
If it's your parents and your peers and virtually all popular media, it's massively naive to think that isn't going to have a normalizing effect on people.
I don't think that's a great analogy, since giving someone a hand when they are dangling off a cliff is easy and anyone (who happened to be around) could do it at low cost. Developing new medical treatments is incredibly expensive and difficult, and only part of that is because of regulatory burdens. You aren't just playing to develop the treatment you are receiving, but also the dozens of potential treatments that the pharma companies invested huge amounts of money into that didn't end up working out.
Half of the article talks about solutions. The last 2 sections are: "It's about new housing, stupid" and "The birth of the central social district"
.. given the many relevant and persistent Amazon connections I have blocked at my firewall, I'd say Amazon is already collecting a vast amount of data to the unsuspecting user already. so .. no.

and for that paltry sum, not even worth it set up an old iPhone loaded with scripts and apps purely to muddy the data.
Until middle school (if you have a girl) then it’s hell for 3 years.
I dunno, try asking ChatGPT to create a very specific layout design in tailwindcss + laravel + blade templates.

It's not flawless but it gets you 90% there, sometimes 100%.

I hate the ui aspect of full-stack, well don't hate, just am slower at design, so having an assistant do my design work is great!