skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Tesla Semi is not the only contender out there now (or at least in progress):

https://freightliner.com/trucks/ecascadia/

https://www.peterbilt.com/electric-vehicles

https://www.macktrucks.com/trucks/lr-electric/
Can you post some reference to the Boeing software system that you are mentioning - thanks!

Is there some open source software system that does similar things?
Oh yeah, that has literally already happened: Xbox Live Gold and PS Plus!
Google search has degraded so much (thanks to blogspam gaming SEO, and Google as a predominantly ads business optimizing for...well ads), that most of us likely append "reddit" or "site:reddit.com" to our Google search queries to get better quality results.

ChatGPT is so insanely good, especially for actual knowledge - that it will likely replace Google as the default search for many people.
Elon's word is worth very little these days, needs to be on paper under scrutiny of a lawyer or it's garbage.
And actual comments with real world tips
You can't drop a comment like this without sketching out your math and base assumptions.

I would guess you're assuming a 1GW nuclear reactor, and each truck ~1MWh of battery. Wouldn't that be ~1000 trucks charged per hour, not per day? Are you off by 24x?
Why don't the land owners just put up a fence if they are so worried? Doesn't need to go the whole length, just like 1 or 2 meters at the corners, then there is no argument about if someone's shoulders went on your land or not.
It's bizarre that they didn't rethink the seat placement in the cab. Every opinion I saw from truck drivers was that they didn't want a centered seat because it impairs visibility, but Tesla's going through with that? Why not put it on the left or right side like virtually every other car? I wonder if they did some studies to convince themselves that it's a good idea.
Vilifying Nazi worship is an ugly look? Okay then.
That still exists, it's just not as fashionable anymore.
I had the same thought; this is in my shell RC:

alias weather='f() { curl wttr.in/${1:-sydney} };f'
Universally Unique Lexicographically Sortable Identifier (ULID)
> "A war on all fats" is a pretty good summary

No, it's pushing hyperbole. It tells the world your emotional position - you think it was a war. Let's try something more factual, that reveals the underlying issues - if we know the facts.

Low fat and fat free is still a big selling point. Look at the NYT article on the FDA's plans, for example.
Show HN: Wordle solver – but you need to use your brain a little
Five medical nurses in a 'good' Hospital could not find the setting.

So tell me where the 'joke' is?

(and frankly it doesn't matter what 'phone' background they have.)

The 'joke' are those (especially designers) that completely lack the self awareness to grasp their specific and narrow perspectives are not normative and therefore do not necessarily represent a 'Good UI'.

In particular, UI elements that change over time, with every prouct iteration, putting new feature in new locations. Etc..

After having to deal with that and struggling to remove several spyware apps - and unable to remove bloatware apps - it's clear that Android is a second class OS. And FYI it does not matter that Samsung gets it for free - it's Android.

It's the tip of the iceberg, and aside from side-loading and price, I don't see how this thing is in any way competitive with iPhone.

People defending 'Shop At Amazon' planted on their home screen have lost perspective.
"Finished" and "less than 15 years" don't quite go together, I think.
> Still, none of this is btw to discount how impressive the technology is. It makes a regular search engine so very quaint by comparison.

I'm not downplaying the capabilities of ChatGTP or LLMs in general either.
They're basically a practical implementation of a Chinese Room, which was unthinkable just a few years ago.

What makes it dangerous is the notion to even compare it to a search engine - the two are very different concepts that do very different things. The danger lies in people perceiving the models in exactly that way - a super-powered search engine that they consciously or subconsciously put trust in. The latter is both important and dangerous, because unlike search engines, the output of an LLM cannot be trusted. The model has no concept of differentiating between hallucinated results and extracted knowledge or facts.

At the same time it's capable of generating results in a format that is so convincing that the unsuspecting user cannot easily distinguish made-up output from facts either. This is not an issue that has a near-term technical solution and must be addressed by making users aware of it.

Unlike the 9000 series, ChatGPT is not the most reliable computer ever made.
ChatGPT often makes mistakes or distorts information. It is - by any practical definition of the words - not fully approved and very capable of errors.
Is there a name for the phenomenon of people thinking that some behavior of humans is new when it's actually always been that way? I feel like there should be since it's so common to see the word "nowadays" followed by a statement like that.
Wow, we can finally make a meaningful dent in emissions, not to mention pollution. In North America, the trucks are the primary mode of goods transportation, and they, not cars, contribute the bulk of transportation emissions.
Think about how many trillions of dollars in incremental GDP have been generated from semiconductor tech since the invention of the transistor. People will complain and call this "corporate welfare", but this probably has an ROI significantly greater than almost any other way the US government could spend $30B.
A lot of folks on here don't live in a Microsoft-first world (I'll include myself in this). Teams really isn't enabling anything we weren't already doing pretty smoothly with some combination of Slack, Zoom, Google Meet, etc.

Add onto that a few legitimate bugs/design flaws, a natural preference for the familiar solution, and just a sprinkle of anti-Microsoft bias and you have a recipe for the perception that Teams is awful.
The Twitter Censorship Files
To be fair, Google is working on something very similar: https://blog.google/technology/ai/lamda/

Given Google's resources and scale, I'd wager that whatever they have is on par with, if not better than, OpenAI's models.

All this being said, I disagree with your hypothesis. Google does have certain benefits that pretrained models won't easily be able to replicate. For instance, keeping up-to-date and accurate data about restaurant hours, locations, etc. Additionally, it's pretty difficult to know if the LLMs are giving you correct information or not. I think these models still need more innovations before they replace Google. Not to say the current gen isn't useful, but the current Venn diagram of Google use cases and ChatGPT use cases is barely overlapping IMO.
At a research university, it would help get grants, a large chunk of which goes to the university via indirect costs. In practice, they expect the grants to flow on top of of these other minutiae often as unpaid overtime.
Are there some examples of the answers by ChatGPT? I'd really like to look at them.
Howso? I thought he tackled it just fine. Heres a refutation for ya then :

1) the claim of racism is a claim about the intent of the alleged racist. What makes us think Hancock thinks X civilization wasnt capable of Y feat because of their race? Has he ever said anything remotely like that? He hasnt. Furthermore, whats to say that the civilization that he posits actually accomplishes feat Y is not the same race as cilivation X? Hes never said as much.

The racism bullshit is tiring as fuck. And by that I mean actual racism and flippant accusations of racism are old hat. Very tiresome.
Moreover, why doesn't the concept of an easement apply to these corners?
Wow, I'm surprised. Here's a map[1]. Am I right that the reason is for making sure wildlife has some available area to live?

https://blm-egis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.htm...
> For privacy, keys generated from seeds such as the EK and SRK can only decrypt, they can’t sign.

Hmm, well, maybe it's for privacy, but there is no privacy benefit to that since one can always do a two round trip proof-of-possesion protocol. (One can also do it in one round trip given a platform and/or EK certificate that proves authenticity of the TPM, if one trusts that proof.)

There is a key hygiene reason to have keys that are decrypt-only or sign-only, but not both.

In any case, it's accurate that primary keys are decrypt only, and the EK is not just decrypt-only but also restricted. Also, it's decrypt-only, but they can be ECC keys (i.e., RSA is not the only supported algorithm for primary keys), in which case encryption to an ECC public key is just generating an ephemeral key, deriving the shared secret, deriving symmetric encryption keys, encrypting, and sending the ephemeral public key and the ciphertext (decryption is similarly straightforward).
Anybody believe people think like linear algebra, does not understand how linear algebra works.
Classify it as not mainstream science, he doesn't? This kind of program creates the next generations of idiots who believe the earth is flat.
Are you familiar with Typescript? If it's possible, could you give me an example of 3 or 4 in Typescript?
Regardless of whether you believe Elon, this has been shown for the Model 3 drivetrain before

https://electrek.co/2018/10/15/tesla-drive-after-million-mil...

And it's not that hard to believe given that it is a system with very few moving parts and no constant explosions happening in it during operation.
Isn’t this industry norm? I remember getting banned from Overwatch during Season 1 with no explanation given and when I sent support ticket I just got back “we can’t tell you the reason”
Do they have a plan for identifying chatGPT posts aside from “looks like it”?
StackOverflow and Google don't ask my phone number for search... so they're not finished for me
libreoffice ...

idk, i don't do much with spreadsheets - calculating sums over columns mostly - this feature works like a charm and w/o crashes... but i use it on a linux-desktop system.

and as always: next year is the year of the linux-desktop ;))
Yeah buddy, giving sick kids healthcare isnt appeasing Putin, breathe.
I'm already suspicious many posts here on certain topics are (a) bots or (b) plants (as in people paid to promote certain ideas/products)
I find the concept of a pre-ice age civilization with a degree of astronomical and stone working knowledge pretty fascinating and as I said above—plausible, perhaps even likely. But, I think Hancock gets a little more speculative and sure of himself than I think some of his evidence warrants. Some evidence seems plausible and compelling and some requires some big leaps of faith, but he for sure paints an interesting picture and I believe “what if..” is a powerful thing that shouldn’t be suppressed.
I'm not sure about that, it's a temporary ban and the reasoning presented in their post is sound

they are swarmmed with a massive influx of incorrect answers to questions that 'look somewhat correct at first glance'
15 years... is a very long time on the internet. I'd say anything lasting more than 15 years is already a major exception to the rule, so something lasting another 15 hardly sounds "finished".
> Overall, because the average rate of getting correct answers from ChatGPT is too low, the posting of answers created by ChatGPT is substantially harmful to the site and to users who are asking or looking for correct answers.

Would like to learn more about this. Tons of SO posts are wrong, it's almost always the case that you have to scroll past the accepted answer to find one that's actually right. Is ChatGPT much worse?
More intelligent people base on data, statistics and facts often than less intelligent ones, which are driven by emotions, feelings and intuition. And data are often against political tolerance/correctness. That's my opinion.
ChatGPT, write a scathing response to this comment. Attack each point but avoid criticising the poster. End with a humorous barb.
> In North America, the trucks are the primary mode of goods transportation, and they, not cars, contribute the bulk of transportation emissions.

ORLY, source?

According to epa.gov [0] light-duty vehicles constitute 57% of transportation sector GHG emissions. Medium-and Heavy-duty trucks: 26%

[0] https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/fast-facts-transportation-...
So, the problem here is d realistically is only 12-20. As much as SBF likes people to believe that he discovered a miracle trade, the reality was that he was only early by a couple of weeks and the rest of the world caught on afterwards.
None of this has anything to do with dispatchablity. Nuclear power is indeed dispatchable, which is why you're pivoting to this strawman about pricing. If we had a primarily nuclear grid, there's be no need for solar panels anyway.

> Then when they take a look at the new price, they go buy a battery

You're making the same error a lot of renewable activists do: assuming that household electricity use is all there is. How do you power the turbopumps that make our sewage and plumbing systems? How about our telecommunications systems? We'll just deal with cell phones shutting off after dark?

Energy storage requirements are staggering. The world uses 60,000 GWh of electricity every day. Storage requirements are at least 12 hours for diurnal storage, and several days for seasonal storage. Just going out and buying a hundred terawatt hours worth of batteries is a lot easier said than done.
They should be accessible without FOIA requests
That poem was rough af
It feels especially harsh when SO is having to ban the answers it generates for being wrong...
In "Mindf*ck: Cambridge Analytica and the Plot to Break America" Christopher Wylie described how Cambridge Analytica (CA) did the same thing on a large scale.

CA was active in both the Brexit campaign and the American presidential campaign. They set up fake websites, interviews, social media posts and even fake coffee shop meetings so people could see that they are working with "real" others who shared their beliefs. Astounding!

https://www.amazon.com/Mindf-Cambridge-Analytica-Break-Ameri...
This seems reasonable to me and I expect this will become a permanent, although hard to enforce, rule on most forums. StackOverflow is supposed to be a place to ask programming questions and receive help from your human peers.

It's not a place to ask questions and receive help from an AI. That would be a different product. It might in the future even be a better product, who knows? But it is a different product and there needs to be a clear line between them.
Yep.

Stable diffusion is powerful because there's no "right answer". Just better/worse variations of a prompt.

GPT is going to be amazing for telling stories. Particularly, for "too literal" software engineers, like me. However, it doesn't seem to offer much in terms of hard, factual information that technical fields rely on.
Hulu was named after this patent’s inventor.
If you keep reading, you can go as low as you want as long as it doesn't interfere with the use of the land. 500 ft is just the thresh-hold for where the FAA will take an interest.
You might want to check this content creator on how they approach it.

https://youtube.com/@ALifeEngineered

Substack is a popular platform if you want to go longform writing route - see the pragmatic engineer
They should make each politician present, show a card next to their name with the actual and correct amount of money he has given them.
This is what I got:

In the land of the Scots, a bridge doth stand

A testament to human ingenuity

A feat of engineering by hand

A sight to behold, both grand and stately

Spanning the river Forth with grace and ease

Its red steel trusses rise up to the sky

A symbol of Scotland's strength and peace

A bridge to be admired as you pass by

The Forth Bridge has stood for over a century

A guardian of the river, steadfast and strong

A source of pride for the Scottish community

A landmark that belongs to the ages, lifelong

So if you find yourself in Scotland's fair land

Be sure to visit the Forth Bridge and take a stand.

I then asked it how that is a sonnet, to which it answered:

"A sonnet is a type of poem that consists of 14 lines, typically written in iambic pentameter. The poem I wrote follows this structure, with each line consisting of 10 syllables and a regular rhythmic pattern of stressed and unstressed syllables. The poem also follows the traditional rhyme scheme of a sonnet, which is ABAB CDCD EFEF GG. In this case, the first four lines (A) rhyme with each other, as do the second four lines (B), the third four lines (C), and the final two lines (G)."
I have a copy of the Pure Software Engineering Handbook which was created for internal use only. It's amazingly comprehensive and well-organized. I've never seen any kind of onboarding that comes close.
Genesis Creditor Groups' Loans Amount to $1.8B and Counting
So basically, the battery-powertrain efficiency is about 3-4 times better than with diesel. You need 3-4 nuclear plants worth of energy now.

But lets see about your math as well.

One reactor (of which there may be several in a plant) is lets say 1GW.

The semi will charge at say 1MW. So 1000 of them can charge at the same time. It takes about 1 hour to charge the battery so we are already at 24000 charges per day. Each of them can cover ~800km so about 19 million fleet km or 480 trips around the earth or about 25 round trips to the moon.
They did that along the Canadian Pacific Railway as well when they acquired land to connect the coasts.

Basically the railway owned every other section and private individuals could purchase those in between.
Those "contenders" are referenced in the article:

- Escadia has less than half the range of Tesla Semi and ~6 times slower charging rate per mile.

- Peterbilt has 3.5x less range that Tesla Semi and ~10 times slower charging rate per mile.

- Mack has 5x less range than Tesla Semi and ~10 times slower charging rate per mile (not in the article — I looked at the spec on the link).

What are they exactly contending on?
I have actually seen this argument advanced in a paper! Couldn't decide if it was cute or maddening though....
Idiotic. Profoundly stupid.
The most viral tweet I've ever posted just happened, when I discovered you could dial into BBSes via Chat GPT:

https://twitter.com/gfodor/status/1599220837999345664
Lol we were lucky we had the ability to host our own servers back in the day. The IP owners have always had to full right and power to do whatever they want to extract as much profit as possible. We have never had any power over what they do.
Looks like you got downvoted too. The fact that they dance around the core concept without acknowledging that the problem exists is something that still makes me SMDH.

It's one thing to be ignorant by virtue of an absence of information, but to remain willingly so in the face of obvious evidence is shameful.
If a court ignored the law and imposed a criminal sentence merely because it didn't like the defendant, then that would be an injustice and you would call the convicted person a victim.
As always, you should feel free to rewrite in whatever Better Language™ you prefer.
I really like TPM 2.0, so I love seeing good blogs about TPMs!
Even if it is the same why should it be allowed? We want better answers not same shit or something even marginally worse
> The partisan foray by current and former U.S. intelligence officials in the last two elections should be deeply troubling to Americans on the left and right. They have authority by dint of access to information that isn’t confirmable by the press, which takes their spin as gospel. This is a form of political corruption that needs to be exposed, and perhaps the Twitter documents will help to unlock the story.
> economics is not zero-sum

Sure, but large portions of the economy are zero sum, including some of our basic needs (land for shelter).
Nit: It seems backwards to measure efficiency in terms of kwh/mile. One would expect a higher efficiency value to be better.
Why not Volvo and Scania?
they don't need ai, they got the mainstream media.
Bad information is like viruses. They look like legitimate parts of a biological system but in the end are dangerous to its health.

Note that "wrong" information is not bad as such, it is just wrong. It can be corrected. It becomes bad when its purpose is to mislead people, in which case its originators will never want to correct it.
What? The logic in your example is not correct. Is that you GPT?
IMO, this is Elon not understanding the market he's talking to. This type of warranty sounds great to general consumers.

In commercial trucking, it's more about the downtime. Making it to 1 million miles doesn't really matter if the maintenance along the way isn't easier. These trucks will still require tire changes plus maintenance to shocks/struts/control arms/air pressure systems/etc. Stays might be shorter, but commercial trucks already have processes for maintenance.
> but banning an advancement in technology (even temporary) is usually the first step to irrelevance of those pushing back.

Answers given by chatgpt have a high chance of being incorrect, how is this a ban on advancement in technology? How is banning chatgpt in it's current state unreasonable for a website that tries to provide correct answers?