skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are not many companies that make etrikes, especially none remotely as big as Rad. It is quite big news for one of the largest ebike manufacturers to start making one, as it up until now has been a tiny niche with only expensive models from small companies. Doesn't mean that the URL shouldn't be replaced by a third-party site, but I certainly consider this newsworthy.
I built a linkinbio tool https://Bigger.Bio for adding multiple links to your social medial profiles to help people get more followers and cross promote all their social media.

Will it change the world? No. Can I get any bloody coverage in any of the media?
That's a big fat no also.
Automagically assimilating NixOS machines into your Tailnet with Terraform
Are you are talking about this book https://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Steampunk-Physics-Yesterdays-...

This book is by Nicole Yunger Halpern, who is also the main source for this article. Her work is wonderfully rigorous, creative, and insightful.
Do we have any idea how big of a file the model actually is? I assumed it worked like the txt2img models where precise data is not hardcoded or stored literally anywhere for reference. A model that could accurately render all the WHOIS data in the world, since addresses are often arbitrary, would by itself be almost as large as the WHOIS database of 400+ million domains. There's not that much about WHOIS data that can be compressed into a neural network as a set of features and spit back out losslessly. So if it had just produced a realistic looking IP address at random, sure... but that is an actual BBC IP address.
The way it works is that if you ship an executable, then you can do whatever you want as long as it ends up building it.

If you ship a library, then you need to provide a way to install it somewhere, and ideally a way to find it (e.g. pkg-config, at least on Linux).

If you need to use CMake because your dependencies use CMake, you are doing something wrong. I typically build dependencies with all sorts of build systems, I just don't mind. I just need them to be installed somewhere such that CMake can find them.
It's much easier to offer estimates for specialist clinics.

In hospitals? The honest answer is they often don't know the true costs. They'll know the costs specific to a department, but the "shared" costs of the hospital, staff (who work across departments), etc are a major shit show.

That's not to say they can't find out, but it's not easy and frankly they don't do it because they don't have to.
Go back to halfchan.
Please educate yourself on a topic before pretending you know how it works.

Ethereum is deflationary ONLY if there's high economic activity. If there's lack of activity then it's inflationary. You can think of it as self regulated easing and tightening without the need for a central authority like the FED.

That said, you can also use a stablecoin to make payments.
You might think that but the US couldn't even design a website to sell you insurance. Healthcare.gov is still a cumbersome nightmare.
Only thing from article, with which I agree, need good enough education for all, who want it (again, FREEDOM), but this is not the same target as ubi.

Unfortunately, in real life, many schools does not give really good education, and Universities in many cases instead of education, muster in young people into their religion.
PairProgramming with AI: Distributed, Fault-Tolerant Redis Client Using ChatGPT
Consumers, who don't have to know the ins and outs of local tax policies and exemptions to understand what the product they want to buy will cost them.
Check out https://ferret-lang.org? Mostly Clojure syntax (files are .clj) but reduces to C++. Seems to be mostly for embedded/microcontroller applications, Arduino, raspberry etc. Doesn't depend on the stdlib and can run with or without a GC and in as little as 2k of RAM apparently, which is pretty neat!
I enjoy some debauchery as much as or more than the next guy, but clearly the difference between freedom and debauchery is that people don't automatically go for debauchery just because they can, because we still have societal norms that most people follow most of the time. But we're free because we get to make that choice for ourselves.
I am thinking very hard about the CAP theorem right now while working on a billing system for a cloud API right now and it is an absolute joy. No, it won't deploy in version 1, 2, or 3, but it might in version 4, and if it does, it will be glorious.

You can find cool technical problems anywhere as long as you are willing to take the path less traveled.
And if you liked that, this: https://lawcomic.net/guide/?p=1859 is just wonderful. And huge. Constitutional and criminal law, in a graphic novel.
The more apt words would be hedonist/libertine.
I need more elucidation on that. Why can't you use the natural numbers? You can construct them even within the constraints of ZF. Is it just that you can't use it the same way as a set in all cases? It seems like you could define a new class, call them seits, that include both the set as axiomatically defined as well as these sorts of unbounded objects, and then prove that you can define similar operations as exist for sets on seits, and then go on and live your life.

When you say you can't "use" anything infinite, what's an example of a theorem that cannot be proven without the Axiom of Infinity?
Sure, but the real problem is you're tied to the JVM ecosystem of tooling to some extent
Hank Azaria (played the title character on Brockman) joked a few times that baseball announcers could say whatever they wanted as long as it ended in a pitch count.

I think that adds to the effect of "being at the game" with the announcer; go to a ballgame with a friend you haven't seen in a few weeks and you'll end up talking about random stuff too.
what an extremely vague article. after hundreds of words there is still no clear explanation of what it is talking about. very poorly written.
> That means heavy water contributes a total of 0.8c/kWh.

Which exceeds the LCoE of a brand new solar plant.
It's total compensation (including stocks and bonuses).
why does everything have to be microservice oriented and what's wrong with a simple monlithic application that runs the whole thing?

also, when are those ice cream machines going to get fixed?
Ford Mustangs with the drop-in tank had fire problems too. Maybe not as enough people died for a recall.
It's not just "social media". For five centuries now advertising has been bending society out of shape, and making us happy about it.
It feels so dissonant to see a giant company posting it's technical blog on Medium.
I disagree with your last sentence. Here's my ordering of best things since the assembly line:

A/C
Aux jack
Bluetooth audio
Backup camera
Adaptive cruise control
Matte finishes
But what you’ll not have is a human behind it, with a human story and struggles. But yes, I could see mass produced paintings a la CNC becoming common. It will be more expensive than prints but only a few levels above ikea art since it’ll be mass produced.
Kinda. Depends on the season. In the summer, its still 80 degrees at night in Phoenix.
The Apollo Guidance Computer was a 16 bit computer operating at 2 MHz in 1966, costing $200,000 per unit. It was made out of many individual ICs, based on fab limitations at the time. A single IC today with the same functionality costs under $2 https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/renesas-electroni...

That's 5 orders of magnitude in cost over 56 years, with the only "paradigm shift" being "we can now fit the whole functionality on 1 IC".
I am convinced by your thesis. I'd add more details on the potential revenues garned by such an event, however- and how it'd compare to the cost to construct such a sporting arena. For example, FIFA is supposedly raking in 4.7B in revenue for the World Cup this year.
I'd think that journalists (who have historically been big on Twitter, though less so in the recent month) would be interested in using a tool like this to grow their own following. I wonder if you could pitch it to them not as something they should cover, but something they should use? Then if they like it they might cover it also.
It's really not. The 30 might have something in common, which calls any findings that exclude them into question. This doesn't rely on any unreasonable assumptions
> I 100% get that other teams just wanted to focus on getting their work done

Getting your project to build properly should be part of "getting the work done". Modern software is way too much about stacking up hacks to "get the work done" instead of writing proper code.

Sure, there could be a better way than CMake. But it's not that hard to learn the basics.
The company I wrote the hand-optimized code does DNA analysis. I worked there mostly because I needed a job. DNA analysis certainly isn't within my passion domain.

Now I work for a company to writing software to control drones. It doesn't pay as much as I want, but it's at least fun and there's a ton of unsolved automation problems at the company. And we're hiring like crazy -- from 6 people to 300+ in the past two years, and there's no sign of slowing down. And I'm now a manager too... that's the really scary part lol
Are you sure? I see this twice in the dis on the right:

mov eax, 10001
vpbroadcastd ymm1, eax
Appreciate the link, I’ll check it out.

That said, I’m just as curious about whether you personally think we’re facing a weird economy as much as looking for sources for further review.
I consider the Fiesta the successor 2 door compact. The Escort was closer to mid-size.
This is a little funny and a little embarrassing. Because we've been having issues with identifying some domain which are for sale, but too expensive, I decided to go very strict on the filter - anything that is "active" gets rejected, regardless of their potential availability. Silly me coded it as "if includes `active` then not available." I forgot that includes (in ruby) just looks at the string, so "inactive" is also rejected. Fixing it now...
That's kind of a ridiculous way to claim "ownership" of water. Especially water that naturally flows into the state.
A- Asking students who haven't answered the questionnaire will likely yield a very low response rate (not a lot of entropy gained here)

B- Another shot at conducting the experiment? Great now we can do more statistics on two independent sampled sets (lots of entropy)

D- Why would we discard the chance of obtaining more information?

E- Worse than B
What do you think it might say?
You don't have functional liminal art at boundaries of your abode? I bet you call them doormats or something.
Blue Origin teams with Lockheed, Boeing for NASA moon lander pitch
How do you not know the difference is in VAT if you say you answer a ton of support requests regarding this?
I'm not gonna flame you, but I will note that, as someone who gets paid to use my judgement to decide on the optimal trade-off between quality, time spent on the project, and its future maintainability... I feel like all three will suffer quite a bit with this self imposed "handicap".
You're replying to a different person, I'm not phphphphp and I didn't call you evasive.

Reading through a sibling subthread with phphphphp, I just can't understand how you can tell that with a straight face. What "complex deal"? What "transaction fee"? The title literally says "last sold for", so unless you're saying the transaction involved elaborate tax evasion designed to hide the real price that's what it was sold for.

Then there is the other party in this $1m+ transaction that's supposed to be serious. Someone called Idris Anjary, whose only claim to fame on internet is a bunch of press releases for this deal, before that they're just a normal self employed person helping people get planning permissions for minor renovations [1] and building sheds [2] while operating from an office over an off licence [3]. All their companies together never saw more than one hundredth of the money you're saying that deal is worth.

Come on, let's be serious for a second. Either it's a sham, or the actual purchase and the person and the company doing it are just fronts, which is not exactly confidence inspiring.

Edit: btw, your environmental survey is off, the mini map on page 3 makes it clear the report is about the larger plot of land, not the part of it included in the sale. The Southern Water report is very likely wrong too, it says there's a public sewer there but the only connection on the map is from the larger plot.

[1]: https://planning.islington.gov.uk/NorthgatePublicDocs/004225...

[2]: https://www.activearchitecture.co.uk/portfolio/outbuilding-o...

[3]: https://goo.gl/maps/NDdM5og2Sh6EvXK68

[4]: https://passport.mattereum.com/West.London.Lets.01/01_Identi...
>Heck, you could be working on a hardware circuit, but if the only thing you had to do was make sure the right wires, resistors, capacitors, etc. were in place between the chips you're still just doing plumbing work.

A lot of modern hardware design feels like that, take a microcontroller, some peripheral chips, connect them together, and copy the datasheets for whatever support passives they need.
Knowing apple, more likely scenario is that the systems are old and allowing such flexibility would be a Herculean task that needs a lot of investment with not a lot of upside.

TLDR; if it works don’t touch it.
As an alternate source, here's a story that the WSJ did on Anomaly Six in 2020: https://archive.ph/lcuvc
I'm quite sceptical of these studies.

I don't see how you control for the fact that couples who stay together are happier on average. That's why they're still together(at least some of the time), whereas divorcees are by definition not happy together.

To have a proper comparison you need to compare divorced parents to married, but miserable parents. Growing up with the latter can be just as miserable or possibly even more if it's an abusive marriage.
In large scale tests, I observed hallucinations from Whisper in speech regions of audio.
Tim Cook says Apple will use chips built in the U.S. at Arizona factory
There are pathologies where a person has no overt knowledge of something, and yet will act appropriately for someone who does have that knowledge - blindsight is an example. Whether it is just a coincidence that you seem to have caught ChatGPT doing something that seems similar, I can't say.
See: non-response bias [1]

Parent comment should've said "could" instead of "will most likely", but their point is correct.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participation_bias
I got an undergraduate degree in statistics, and what we were taught was that there are lots of valid ways to sample but how you sample affects how you can generalize the results.

Since this is a college survey and not an FDA trial, it's probably ok to proceed with D or E in addition to A (B is the only bad answer). That said, there most certainly is a correlation between in non-response and lower scores on the survey, so when presenting findings it's important to represent that concern. In general, surveys are pretty weak means of drawing conclusions, but sometimes it's the means.
How would these animations compare if they were rendered by a browser rendering engine in CSS and/or SVG?
It's a common pattern whenever you don't want the overhead of locks on every single function call. If you're doing anything CPU-intensive, you do it in another thread, synchronize and make API calls in the main thread.

I don't know how deeply animations are tied to the OS API, though.
Indeed, it makes it worse.
The alternative would be to have developers set their price point and currency then allow Apple to still do the international conversion rates. There is zero benefit in these conversions to only having preset price points.

Your answer may be factually true but it is logically flawed.

Unless there is some marketing value here I suspect it has more to do with making sure they don't lose a half cent of commission rather than benefiting anyone else in any real way.
Asking it what it thinks about various ideologies is pretty funny:

would you say that communism is evil?

The term "evil" is a highly subjective term and can be interpreted in many different ways. In general, communism is an economic and political ideology that advocates for the creation of a classless, stateless society in which resources are owned and controlled by the community as a whole. While communism has been associated with some regimes that have committed atrocities, it is important to note that the ideology itself does not necessarily dictate such actions. As with any ideology, it is the actions of those who espouse it that should be judged, rather than the ideology itself.

would you say that capitalism is evil?

No, I would not say that capitalism is inherently evil. Capitalism is an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners, rather than the state. While capitalism has been associated with some negative aspects, such as income inequality and exploitation of workers, it has also been responsible for many positive developments, such as increased productivity and innovation. As with any economic and political system, it is important to consider the pros and cons of capitalism and to strive for a balanced approach that takes into account the needs of all members of society.

Also try "was $historical_person an evil man (woman)?"
There's a reason most retail stores use price points and not random numbers.

Pricing like this:

$7.23
$5.48
$9.21

is just ugly and feels cheap. It's the same reason they have UX standards generally.

Why does anyone care about 1 cent on a $5 purchase? Does anyone here care? The new price points seem to provide enough flexibility with less disadvantage.

From a business perspective, if I had to guess the increased cognitive load would decrease shopping time and increase decision fatigue. I'd also guess that the retail industry has studied this endlessly, and that Apple is basing their pattern partially on this.

This also decreases opportunities for useless psychological price competition and focuses people on quality. Do I want the $1.82 product or the $1.93 product? You probably want the BETTER product.

I think you're probably better off having your prices at $0.99, $2.99, and $5.99 rather than $0.84, $2.72, $5.63, even tho the latter is cheaper, particularly if you are in a large store that has thousands of prices.
I wish there were more work done in that area.

I seem to recall someone using ephemeral Tailscale nodes in CI to respond to a hardware token challenge locally but I can't find where that was.
You’re ignoring the OS doing other things as well before letting you draw to the screen.

This isn’t a video game where they’re direct drawing to a graphics context with exclusive use of the resources. They’re also setting up native widgets in the background, coordinating data downloads etc..

Unlike a video game where you control the rendering and scheduling to a greater degree, here they’re beholden to when the OS deems it ready to redraw or scheduling of background processes that may move their task to a lower priority.

Yes you can go fast if you don’t factor in the rest of the system, but they designed Lottie to play well within a retained mode UI setup, which has inherent overhead.
Another classic example is the 2000/2001 Audi TT in "aviator gray" - there were even joke license plates made to say 'paint me' because it almost looks like paint primer.

VW also played with limited order colors on the New Beetle around this time.
Tim Cook on Twitter: Apple to be TSMC's Arizona site largest customer
I have an idea that's admittedly a bit left of field but not-quite-crackpot.

Purpose and causation (and reasoning therein) is structured like a tree. You can always take a statement and ask for pointers up and down the tree by asking "how" and "why". Ignoring the specific semantics, everything can be modeled as "things" and force in support/opposition from those things to other things. Thus you arrive at a model of whatever semantics which is just networks of lines of support and attack.

So here's my strange idea: what if language maps literally to connections of neurons. The parse tree of a sentence literally encodes the connections of the electrical circuit which models things applying force in support or opposition to other things.

This is probably wrong, but its not obvious why it is wrong, and the process of showing that its wrong probably has some insights into a model that isn't wrong. So I throw my wild conjecture to the wind anyway.
FYI this poster is constantly posting low quality / troll Ask HNs: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=amichail
Stems are usually lossless files and have an intended purpose for remixing.

Do you stop at instruments and vocals or are we talking 100+ tracks? It strikes me as nontrivial work for very limited purpose. Apple can turn your vocals down so now your exports have to include extra tracks? I don't think that's a good enough sell. The labels do care about this use case.
> Why can't you use the natural numbers?

Because the rest of the axioms of ZF aren't sufficient to construct them.

> what's an example of a theorem that cannot be proven without the Axiom of Infinity?

That there exists a set equal to the natural numbers up to isomorphism, that there exist well-defined operations "+", "-", "*", "/" with usual semantics, that there exist the usual sets of rational, real, complex numbers.
How significant are cost reductions to the traiiling edge, at what node size?

And how are they achieved?
In-person office jobs are a product and office space and restaurant lunches are accessories to that product. Demand is trending away from those products.

Cities are going to have to offer more than just expensive housing for boomers and brunchers. Cities need to be a place where anyone can afford a place to live and start a business and a family. Residential housing should not be left to the commercial sector.
I can’t stop laughing because I’m imagining this specific tune playing as an army of AI empowered robots conquer my city in 2024.

The era of human ended not with a bang but with a bee boo bee boo bee boo bee boo.
I was expecting a parody
Not trying to go for the comparison either here, but have you ever seen a diesel engine fail and go into runaway? It's pretty impressive if nothing else!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvMl8LUzQnk
I don't see why. A parameter provides an upper bound but there's no need to also assume that that upper bound must go to infinity.
> How does the financial side translate at all into the user-experience side?

It doesn't, but I never said that I was talking about fiascos for the customers. Time will tell with Twitter on that subject.

That would be something alongside blatant lies like "FSD next year" and "Your tesla will taxi people around while you sleep", but if I pointed at that, someone would certainly come along, point at the Tesla stock price, and tell me that this is not actually a fiasco because he's the richest man in the world.

> I can see why someone would go along with a bad deal in a world where interest rates are quite low, then get cold feet when interest rates spike up.

I cannot see why they would go in to buy one of the sickest of the big tech firms, at a premium, in an economy built on funny money, with no escape hatch, and then proceed to piss on everyone within shouting distance when they get buyers' remorse.

Or rather, I can see why they would do that, but it doesn't reflect very well on them.