skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You do realize that oomd has as much to do with systemd as your bash script that has a service file written for it?
htop also includes columns for read/write.

There's also more detailed CPU usage you can turn on, including I/O wait.

Use it, it's great.
This comment exemplifies a pattern of rather useless comments that I've seen a lot of online recently, that are analogous to "contradiction - stating the opposing case with little or no evidence" on the argument pyramid: when a commentator X states a thing, commentator Y states that that thing isn't true, with no supporting evidence, but more importantly no additional value or elaboration added - just saying "that's wrong" without explaining why, or saying what is actually the case.

For instance, here, value would be added by stating what are the actual causes of suicide - or even adding research that supports your point even if you don't want to talk about what the actual causes are.
Siberia is also having huge problems with this as well - so much damn forest!
> I never bought into the "eye of the beholder" on aesthetics.

Indeed, but I suspect this has a lot to do with the embrace of materialism, a metaphysical view that has far-reaching and destructive intellectual consequences. Once you accept materialism, you have a whole world of phenomena that cannot be explained purely in terms of res extensa which leads some people to a kind of crypto-Cartesian position in which this unexplainable excess is swept under the rug of the "subjective". (I say "crypto-Cartesian" because res extensa cannot accommodate this excess explanatorily, so clearly you've got to pass the buck and squirrel away things in this metaphysical time-out zone that you've conveniently constructed to hold all that things you cannot explain according to your officially stated dogmas.)

Also, philosophical liberalism encourages a kind of indulgence of the subjective, a kind of alternate reality protected from error and insulated from threatening facts. Desire is one such thing kept in the safety of this interior world. It is not possible to have evil or disordered desires (with some ad hoc exceptions). It is not possible to have bad taste. These are "subjective" matters, and since only objective matters can be debated, then, as the saying goes, de gustibus non est disputandum. "That's just your opinion, man!"
You can put all your writes in a queue to be processed by a finite set of writers. I think most CRUD applications can afford the delay and if not you can pair it with a write through cache.
Encrypted iCloud! Never thought I’d see the day- figured intelligence agencies wouldn’t be a big fan- I guess it’s only optional though. Still won’t be using iCloud on my iPhone, but I could at least consider it.
Demonstrably, modern music does suck: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVME_l4IwII
Apple Expanding 10-Minute 'Everyone' AirDrop Limit to All Users with iOS 16.2
i mean sure, yeah, they're maybe cash-rich, but firing people still sucks unless you're inhuman. knowingly upending hundreds of lives and families who are less financially secure during a not-recession-recession and a slow hiring market must be emotionally difficult to deal with.
It doesn't matter. You are missing the entire point about E2EE.
ChatGPT Overloaded
Btw, I wrote a whole paper about language models and their ability to follow linguistic, semantic, or phonetic constraints.

I bet you'll like it.

https://paperswithcode.com/paper/most-language-models-can-be...
Be careful, there were distinct developmental steps:

opportunistically using fire

keeping and transporting fire

making fire, intentionally and controlled

the last step may have been discovered only in the last 10-100000 years, expert opinions diverge a lot here
US can always pass a bill or have one that enables them to covertly force apple to comply otherwise Tim goes to jail. Easy
If you have a lower baseline of happiness, please do yourself a favour and read Albert Camus' The Myth of Sisyphus.

It starts with:

There is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide. Judging whether life is or is not worth living amounts to answering the fundamental question of philosophy. All the rest— whether or not the world has three dimensions, whether the mind has nine or twelve categories—comes afterwards. These are games; one must first answer.

Absurdism is a great way to live life and understand that nothing is worth killing yourself for.
While this is true, it shouldn't make anyone more worthy of a closer look. It's the same argument used to justify mass surveillance. Trying to defend a Constitutional right to privacy, if one exists in your country, does not mean you are automatically trying to hide doing something wrong.
One can argue the iOS approach was more secure, since someone getting hold of your iPhone wouldn’t be able to snoop on your Tinder messages.

On the other hand I appreciate the hackability, and it is your data. If you’re in the EU, maybe you could have made a GDPR request to get the messages in a database.

Ultimately I don’t disagree with this iOS choice because we’re the odd ones; I understand the decision to put the privacy of “regular users” above a niche developer method which could be exploited more than used in a legitimate way.

It feels to me the correct solution in this case is that Tinder’s database should be encrypted on both iOS and Android and they would provide a way to export chats.
The RSUs are double-trigger. The tax liability doesn't trigger until they become liquid.

(source: I got laid off at 4:02 am this morning.)
Lithium chemistry in a AA form factor, with integrated downconversion and even charging port and circuitry in each individual battery, are cheaply available on Amazon, eBay, newegg etc. Depending on how much you want to spend, they range from no-name companies lying about huge capacities, to real brands advertising (unfortunately in mWh!) genuinely useful capacities, and they are CHEAP. They handily beat Ni-mh batteries in pretty much every way; capacity, self discharge, useful voltage until they die (this actually has a downside in that device battery indicators can't tell that the batteries are running low), cycle lifetime, no annoying management like having to be careful when and how you charge your batteries etc.
I just got the cheap Domo MS171, it does what it’s supposed to do and folds nicely in a drawer but I’m sure there are many better options out there.
The irony here is that bloggers were a big part of internet counterculture not so long ago, and now we've got these long screeds written on blogs that exude a sort of boomer-ish "back in my day (6 years ago)...".

The take would be a lot more interesting if the targets weren't so utterly, predicably, boringly safe to criticize either. I guess dissecting a counterculture that isn't predominantly young white men into NFT's would take a bit more courage. though.
I'm Neon CEO. Happy to elaborate how this works or any additional questions you might have.
That's not the point. The point is that Apple hasn't closed the government out of Apple user's phones. The point of E2EE is to remove the power of the middleman to read the data but that middleman also has complete control over the device and the software running on it with remote root access.

Apple's ecosystem is, by default, design and necessity, insecure to Apple. Keys stored on an Apple device are insecure.

One can easily make a similar argument for Android/Google, however, a security conscious user could still take control over their device and install a more secure OS.
[video] The book with a multiplayer first-person shooter inside
look at the date
arent you mixing Airbus A380 with Airbus Beluga?
But they do charge users directly: https://telegram.org/faq_premium?setln=en

It's a typical freemium model. I'd subscribe if I were certain that my money won't be going to Russia.
Show HN: We built a Slack-based workflow assistant for devs and their teams
Hey, Nir here - co-founder & CEO of Zigi. It’s a personal workflow assistant that was built for devs and their teams to automate non-coding tasks, giving updates and quick actions only on what’s relevant.

It works by examining your activity in Jira and GitHub (more systems being added soon) to understand your workflow, creates context out of all that information, and offers you actionable assistance from Slack.

Zigi is customiazible. We’re building it to match every R&D persona so you can tailor the messages and assistance you get to meet your specific needs. Like if you’re TL, you can get daily updates on the progress of your team’s sprint or as a QA, you’ll be notified as soon as ticket is ready for testing.

We’re developers who are used to managing big R&D teams and over the last few years, we have seen dev change drastically. There’s so much overhead on top of coding, more dependencies, multiple tools, that developers are overloaded. And now, the world has changed to make teams are remote and in different time zones, which just makes everything more complex.

Zigi takes a new approach to driving productivity, while keeping devs and their teams happy. It provides hands-on help with personalized automation, so we can manage our day-to-day tasks with minimal distractions and maximum focus.

Some things to know about Zigi: you don’t need to set it up or run any config; it’s customizable to your needs; it only needs user-level permissions and doesn't read or scan your code; it’s ISO 27001/27017 & Soc 2 Type 2 certified and GDPR compliant.

It’s also free for devs.

Sign up to get started here. Once you install Zigi simply type /zigi support to write our team directly with any feedback, join our Slack channel or leave a comment below (we want to know what you really think!).

Twitter: https://twitter.com/zigi_ai
Slack support channel: https://join.slack.com/t/zigisupport/shared_invite/zt-1l86ns...
Write me directly; Nir@zigi.ai
Or as a friend of mine suggested, more than ten years ago and only half in jest, I think: just block all porn sites on IPv4 (but not on IPv6). The demand for IPv6 will soon be overwhelming.
You’re just seeing the areas close to the roads, which also tend to be those that burn more often or get treated easiest. Go a little further back or look at aerial photos, and it’s just a tiny drop in the bucket. And those more remote areas are often far worse/more heavily overgrown.
We got to stick up for one another and lift each other up. We're in the same tribe, even if we don't know it.
Also you are providing cover to agents of US intelligence who use it
Without abstraction it would be difficult to write a proof that your implementation of the monoid laws stay within specified bounds.

It's not "leaky" if the specification doesn't say anything about the space bounds. That's a separate concern from "abstraction" itself.

Update The idea of a monoid is divested of any real-world implementation and that's what makes it useful (and consequently also hard to explain). The important thing is that there are laws to how the operations on monoids compose and relate to one another that must be maintained no matter how they're implemented in an actual computer.
Hold on -- I didn't blame the media for this fraud. Did you just accept my point that a wording can suggest a narrative even without explicitly endorsing it?

You're almost there! Now look back at the title: "Ellison was bound for success. Then she got into crypto" and realize it's wrapped in an exonerating tone.

The title endorses a narrative. Yes, some sentences walk it back a little, but the bell was clearly rung. Again, the whole issue of framing is that you can do a lot via emphasis: put the damning stuff in footnotes and puff in the headlines.
Worth to mention that Changzhou is a city on the south side of Yangtze River, where no heat provided to public, meaning that cities on the north side could be way worse due to coal burning for heat supply.
Since we're talking about ugly city hall buildings...

> When you do a city hall, it has to convey an image of the people, and this had to represent the people of Dallas ... The people I met – rich and poor, powerful and not so powerful – were all very proud of their city. They felt that Dallas was the greatest city there was, and I could not disappoint them. – I.M. Pei (architect)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dallas_City_Hall

Despite best intentions this building feel intimidating. Just walking up to it, it hangs over your head, and feels like the weight of government is about to be inflicted upon me and I just want to file a permit for my home security alarm. Just pointing out, the artists themselves have trouble making their designs match their intentions.
I am thinking since then that maybe it was a staged performance
Or they realize that letting Tor users makes spam explode.
I generally see IPv6 being a better reflection of reality vs the illusion presented by IPv4/NAT. To put it another way, even if your server has no public IP address, if someone punches through your firewall it's not like that matters anymore right? If they have the keys to the kingdom they can change your network to be however they like.

If your network is a house, and your firewall is the front door, then all NAT does is force you to have a weird fractal room layout where rooms are inside rooms, inside rooms. But if a dude breaks in through your front door, it doesn't matter how many rooms you have, he will find what he wants.

IPv6 lets you have as much rooms as your want and lets you optionally send mail to specific ones. If someone breaks in they still have access to everything, but instead of having to navigate a fractal house, they have to navigate a house with a nicer layout and a trillion doors.

The metaphor is falling a part a bit here but my point is that if your server has some form of physical network connection that eventually leads to the internet, it's address scheme isn't going to help you much, even if it makes you sleep better.
Which films are you referring to? I wouldn't say that an Oscar nomination is definitive proof of quality, but it certainly is a strong signal of quality, which can't be said about similar award shows (Grammys).
Blender is the one program where features are added faster than one can learn them.
Honestly, just that it existed and was a common feature of some peoples' lives.

I grew up feeling very outcast. I grew up in a town of less than 50, in a super poor, rural part of the US. My interests were outdoors related, but not guns and god like everyone around me. I was more interested in learning about natural systems and the interplay of wild plants and animals and humans in the world. I never 'fit in' anywhere. None of the school clubs, none of the classes, everywhere I went I felt that I had to 'be someone else'.

Then I went to college and learned that, for many people, they literally get to do that every day, and that there was a name for it! It felt validating that someone else in the world experienced what I experienced (even if it was whole-language based instead of just dialect/cultural norm based).
> Edit regarding World IPv6 day. I must be thinking of June 6, 2012: "This time, it's for real."

world ipv6 day (24 hours) was in 2011.

world ipv6 launch (turn it on & leave it on) was in 2012.

(ppl mix the two up all the time, understandably!)
There is likely no amount of money that can do so. So let’s hope they bankrupt themselves trying
Yeah, I can't really blame the author for not wanting to go any further down that particular rabbit hole. From what I've read, it also sounds unpleasantly similar to conditions in the FTX/Alameda warren.
You are right. I guess I was thinking that none of the FANG provides a “desktop” client app with e2e.

But Android already collects a lot data from the device before encrypting.
That’s along the lines of asking “Do you have evidence that UFOs have NEVER landed on earth?” in response to someone asking if you have evidence that UFOs have landed…
I had a hard time taking this article seriously after seeing the first picture with the caption "new ugliness". The picture depicts art by KAWS, arguably a very successful modern artist - someone must think what he is doing is worthwhile. I personally don't like his art, but saying it's "ugly" is rather subjective..
You're asking for proof of a negative that cannot be fulfilled without having access to all copies of all versions of the source code deployed for every Apple device in the world for their entire history. This seems an unreasonable burden.

Either we accept some amount of vulnerability at the minimum and deal in likelihoods rather than certainties, or we simply do not use modern communication devices whatsoever. Given we're here on HN, we all have clearly chosen the former, so the question becomes: "is it likely that Apple have violated individual users' privacy in this manner?", to which I think the answer is "no" because (a) it's never been necessary before given the availability of alternate methods, (b) we have absolutely no evidence to suggest otherwise, and (c) we do have evidence of a history of Apple being at least somewhat reluctant to cooperate with the federal government of the US when it comes to individuals' privacy, to the extent that they are able (e.g., the San Bernardino case). So although it is true that we cannot be certain of our privacy, it seems very likely that Apple's efforts to improve user privacy are not disingenuous.
My favorite HN retort. :)
I can confirm that I have never had a friend beaten by someone operating in their official capacity as an employee of a corporation.

Nor have I ever had a friend threatened with violence by someone acting in their official capacity as an employee of a corporation.

I don't think I'm holding corporations to different standards.
Can you show your working on this? Because a 100MHz CPU can do 100,000,000 things a second, and a 4GHz CPU can do 4,000,000,000 things a second, and if my math's right, that means the 4GHz CPU can do 40 times as many things a second at the 100MHz CPU.

Now, you might argue 'the 4GHz CPU is multicore!', and so sure, maybe we're up to 8 times 40, which is, I'm pretty sure, 320. And maybe you'll say that the cache is bigger, so you'll be able to keep the data pipelines full and get more done on the faster CPU. But how are you getting to 'at least 2,000'?
most sites seem to treat Tor poorly, possibly due to abuse. well-used VPNs also can suffer from Google captchas etc. not that I like that fact, but it seems to be inescapable
Could we maybe not on this website use the term glowie considering it's explicitly sourced from a neo nazi and a phrase involving the n word. seems like maybe not real in line with HN rules....
Sure, for this round. Later rounds usually aren't so generous.
There are actually quite a few quotes attributed to Twain (and Einstein, and Lincoln, and many famous "others") that may or may not have been said first (or at all) by the people they're attributed to. Interesting "rabbit hole" to explore for those into that sort of thing…
Hopefully their short term struggles lead to a better software/internet ecosystem and more fulfilling careers.
Okay, so when is Apple going to certify against any standards[1][2] higher than "Applies when you require confidence in a product's correct operation, but do not view threats as serious."[3] with a security standard, AVA_VAN.1, whose objective is: "A vulnerability survey of information available in the public domain is performed by the evaluator to ascertain potential vulnerabilities that may be easily found by an attacker. ... Penetration testing is performed by the valuator assuming an attack potential of Basic." [4][5].

On page 25 of [1], we can see the security auditing done as part of their only official security certification for the iOS was: "The evaluators searched for publicly known vulnerabilities applicable to iOS using the following sources... The search was performed on multiple occasions between... using the following search terms... The valuator's CVE search found no vulnerabilities apart from the ones listed in the developer's security content disclosure statements, all of which have been fixed in subsequent releases on iOS. The validators reviewed the work of the valuation team, and found that sufficient evidence and justification was provided by the valuation team to confirm that the evaluation was conducted in accordance with the requirements of ..." tl;dr The evaluation process is that they do a web search of key words, check that all the publicly disclosed vulnerabilities have been patched, then call it a day.

To put that into perspective, their are certifying against AVA_VAN.1. It is only at AVA_VAN.2 that the evaluator is required to do any independent vulnerability analysis as seen in [5] Page 155 AVA_VAN.2.3E (bold is changes from the previous level). At AVA_VAN.3 you need to evaluate against "Enhanced-Basic" attack potential. It is only at AVA_VAN.4 that you need to evaluate against attackers with a "Moderate" attack potential. At AVA_VAN.5 (the highest level) you need to evaluate against attackers with a "High" attack potential. Apple's only security certification, which in their own words "provide a measure of confidence—that is, security assurance—that the security needs of a system are being satisfied" and are "used by many organizations as a basis for performing security evaluations of IT product" is wholly three levels below "Moderate" and is effectively self-graded.

Until they actually certify against a standard requiring moderate security, it is only prudent to take them at their word and assume that their products are only fit for systems that "do not view threats as serious". If they want their security to be taken more seriously they should prove it against internationally recognized standards assessed by independent third parties rather than issuing unsupported marketing fluff.

[1] https://support.apple.com/guide/certifications/ios-security-...

[2] https://support.apple.com/library/APPLE/APPLECARE_ALLGEOS/CE...

[3] https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/bsi/articles/best-practices/requ... EAL1: Functionally Tested

[4] https://commoncriteriaportal.org/files/ppfiles/pp_md_v3.1.pd... Page 136 Section 5.2.6 AVA_VAN.1

[5] https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/files/ccfiles/CC2022PAR... Page 154 Section 14.3.3
This is smoke from forest fires. The EPA changes were in other areas.
Or maybe into developing a new Matrix client from scratch.

The networking libraries may be fine. The UI could be completely rebuilt.

(Sadly, I don't have a ton of cash, or even a ton of time, to dedicate to such things.)
Police in Connecticut are using VR to train officers in de-escalation tactics
If anyone reading this has a ton of cash to dump into element/matrix development, please head over to funding@matrix.org immediately (cf https://matrix.org/blog/2022/12/01/funding-matrix-via-the-ma...)
Not in fintech. The big Stripe layoff (14%) was before Twitter.

I think Twitter gets a lot more credit than it deserves for the layoff wave, given that companies had already put effort into modeling the ROI of their labor. The idea that you could do significant workforce reduction and not have the product completely collapse overnight isn't new: it's obvious.
SBF between his own prior arbitrage wealth and his family's wealth was set for life as for as necessities. He could move to a single family home in Iowa, find a nice wife, raise kids, send them all to college and generally enjoy barbeques and reading books for the rest of his days if he liked. Without working further, or working for free for charities to create their crypto plugin to donate to feed the homeless or whatever
genuinely altruistic goal.

He had the best setting imaginable but still managed to do bad things. Crypto "made" him do do bad things in the same way a deer gun makes one guy point it at a store clerk while others are just using it to feed his family some venison or wild hog.