skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well you also need to house the mice and do what you can to avoid unnecessary discomfort. In that process you will certainly be doing accounting to e.g. ensure you have enough cages and that they are being cleaned at a proper frequency.

You will also be justifying the study protocol and as part of that an intended sample size. Sure if a mouse gets killed accidentally by a shaky undergrad it's not a major event, but you also can't just kill an order of magnitude more mice than the approved proposal without getting additional approvals.

There are strict rules about this at every university I've seen and I imagine they developed because of government grant stipulations rather than out of the goodness of their hearts. It's a legit cost - vets need to be on staff and individual labs can be fined for breaking rules. I'd guess biomed companies end up with a similar structure normally due to how closely linked they are with the rest of the research machine.

Having these centralized housing areas for mice from different projects, in addition to the IRB records of what was proposed, ought to give a pretty accurate number of mice on the department level. If the government asked for it to be calculated, I'd be shocked if the university didn't quickly turn around with a number.

Regardless, it is bad scientific practice to not document the number of mice used. It's not even an animal welfare thing, you should be documenting the number of petri dishes you look at too. Not doing so could easily enable sketchy behaviors like p-hacking as well as increasing likelihood of honest mistakes.

I'd also hope at a company like Neuralink they have electronic lab notebook functionality that would make it straightforward to pool numbers across individual researchers.

Personally I didn't find the 1500 number so outlandish, as I assume Neuralink is targeting a very broad scope. However some of the other details certainly raise red flags about their operating procedures.
David Bacon, Quantum Physicist
He said he deleted it because mentioning Marx “attracts angry fools”, so if you’re right, his attempt to save face is hilarious.
Channel and spatial/binaural tracks I'd expect, but separated tracks for instruments/vocals is a lot more time consuming and the kind of thing that studios/producers/masterers would bluster at enough that I wouldn't expect it to come close to giving Apple the volume they'd likely want.

It absolutely could be done, I just think that Apple would want very good coverage and studios would be very slow to provide this format.
As someone on the right spectrum of fiscal policies, I wholly support UBI for the potential to reduce spending overall. No more fat cats in the government, you don't need managers upon managers to decide who gets what. On average, the US federal government spends at least 1 trillion on welfare each year, and state and local another 1.4 Trillions in hundreds (maybe thousands) of programs. 2.4 trillions each year means 7500 per person. Double up that number (it will be a wash for richer people) and you're mostly done. All the state needs to do is take care of special disabilities, which require significantly more money. But most everyone else can make due with 15k a year.
I use /e/ foundation's Mail, which is a fork of K9. I use it with Posteo. I used Fairemail before, I don't think I miss anything.
* Learn the basics with in-game tutorials

The steam version has added tutorials in-game for the first time. In the past many people used "guides" or such, but unless you started with the exact same seed/location, you'd often have to figure out things as you went.

https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/getting-started-with/97... was a decently well done guide for it's time.
Слава Україні! Excellent follow through on Jetbrains part!
Here's a first draft, comments welcome: https://github.com/google/highway/pull/1078.
Yes I think that's pretty much exactly it. We operate in a way which works in 170 countries (or a few less, there are some exceptions for real estate because it's very very localised). Getting down to the legal fundamentals really helps: "who is paying who for what?" and as long as the underlying transaction is clean, clear and well-understood, there is pretty much always a way to make it work legally.
yep, I did the same. So, last time I dug into it, I found a separate issue where it would darkwake to do things like check in with find my mac, and then an app that had an idle power assertion would prevent the darkwake from fully shutting down again. That's separate from it getting into a weird loop of waking and sleeping though.
If you put a backslash in front of the asterisk it should be kept as-is instead of triggering the formatting.
Listen to the toilet - it could detect disease
I've been recently trying to resurrect my mom's old 2015 MacBook Air and there's a special excitement in being able to follow the clues on the logic board as to where there's a problem, and then being able to fix it.

When I was going through my father's stuff after he died, I came across a Television manual that had come with the product. It included a full schematic of the TV. Every resistor, capacitor, transistor, and diode. I marveled at the idea that the company who made this TV was more interested in your having confidence in the product than protecting their next sale...
For anyone - anyone who's faffed around with JavaScript's spread syntax when working with nested immutable data, anyway - struggling to understand the general concept or utility of optics, I'd encourage looking into monocle-ts. The motivation [0] that kicks off the README instantly made me a believer, and TypeScript's idiosyncratic type system makes using the library remarkably natural; it fits right in without needing to deal with anything analogous to Template Haskell.

[0] https://github.com/gcanti/monocle-ts#motivation
I've been there.

The last time around was in 2020. It seemed like it took forever to get any response. Even when I was able to get through the interview process, it just stalled and I didn't hear back at all. I thought I was being ghosted.

I finally took an offer in late January. By March I'd had no fewer than five companies come back with written offers out of the blue, long after I'd forgotten about them.
It's done the line for two years now. Now it looks like the current syllable in the word.
>It works for the super rich in Brazil

I guess that could be the vision for the US to: a developing country style society, with utral-nice fenced areas for the rich, a supporting 10-20% class, and "skid-row lite" welfare land for the rest, with crumbling infrastructure...

And if things end up worse, the rich have already bought houses in New Zealand and elsewhere anyway...
>No one is arguing that absolutely no changes to the grid shall take place.

Yes. In fact one common demand is an almost total replacement of current fossil and nuclear plants.

The viability of electric cars is directly related to the local price of electricity. If you want to see more electric cars on the street the first step should be to reduce the price of energy and the stability of the infrastructure.

EU countries are planning to ban fossil fuel powered cars in the next decade, is energy production actually catching up? Or to rephrase: when will Germany stop being the country with one of the highest energy prices in the world?
> Why wouldn't you want to be part of a union?

There’s no upside for me, and severe downsides.

My reasoning, in particular:

1) My skills are unique and in high demand. I can best maximize my own compensation through direct negotiation.

2) Compensation is effectively zero-sum, and I don’t want to subsidize low performers.

3) I don’t want to subsidize a parallel, mostly useless (and probably entirely useless) shadow management hierarchy in the form of union officials.
As a Central Florida resident this threw me off.

Poor SFB accidentally associated with the garbage person SBF...
The only reason I'll agree with this article is because what it's talking about is so common now ... I hate it. 100% boring.

But when I first saw it, I kinda liked it.
Some GDPR Scenarios (2018)
There is something off about this argument. On one hand, you say "Humans derive a lot from process, not the final product", which I completely agree. But you also say "places like ArtStation get flooded with AI generated images", which seems to indicate there is a focus on showing off the final product.

I make pottery, and my pieces suck (in terms of shape, usability, even stability) compared to ones made by professional artists or in a factory. I cannot make two similar mugs for the life of me. But it is the process I enjoy, the learning, the improving. And the nice community I've built around me that shares the same passion.

Maybe I'm underestimating the power of text-to-image, but people still learn how to play the guitar (despite Ableton), or chess (despite Stockfish), or sculpture (despite 3D printing).

My honest question is: why should this time be different?
Ah I see, you're right I guess they didn't contemplate the scenario of "we want to distrust this CA - against its wishes - but we still trust it enough to make it an orderly transition instead of an emergency". I guess it was previously assumed that CA trust would be binary and that CAs would be cooperative - seems like a pretty common evolution that internet standards go through.

The problem is, code that handles these things is safety critical and requires real and sustained investment to be reliable. Given this overhead (and the gaps in CRL/OCSP support that I mentioned), it's unclear if this use case will be common enough to commit to supporting.
Why isn't it the same as say an oil pipeline? Those can get really long.
As the saying goes – markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.
The first thing that came to mind to me was "AI researcher". After all, if you're one of the people advancing the AI models that automate everyone else's job, your job isn't going to automated.
People on hackernews, for self-evident reasons, tend to not be receptive to the argument that some technologies shouldn't be made.
Recalls are only one metric. Tesla (and Polestar FWIW) does terrible when it comes to "vehicle quality": https://www.theverge.com/2022/6/29/23188085/jd-power-initial...
Wonderful Progress Against Severe Lupus
Anymore. You only need a law because it was happening.
ChatGPT has no ads because it's a free tech demo (see GPT-3, DALLE-2). It's almost sure that as soon as it gets out of the demo there will be a pricing model.

Google is free and has to pay for its costs. The question on how to make a Google with no ads has already been answered by kagi.com
No they did not because real estate prices in suburbs went up.
> Take the use case of global stablecoin transfers. The ability to send cash point-to-point anywhere in the world is obviously valuable and novel.

You're not sending "cash" though, you're most likely sending USDT or some other centralized stablecoin backed by a shady company ("stablecoin" is a very misleading term in this context given the counterparty risk). That's one point about trust being moved instead of removed, you need to trust the issuer to some extent. To this day I still haven't heard of a centralized stablecoin being fully audited, you merely get attestations, meaning that you can't treat them as "cash", you have a big risk just holding them.

Transferring / converting currencies from most countries to most other countries is easy and way cheaper via centralized means, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wise_(company) has been around for 11 years and was probably not first, and the fees are lower than what a blockchain transaction on BTC/ETH would cost. This is not even an apple to apple comparison, since in most cases you still need to convert your USDT back to USD to actually use them, incurring more fees in the process.

What ETH does allow you to do which you can't do with Wise and others is sending USDT without censorship. That's probably the best way to bypass US regulations if you want to send USD where the US government doesn't want you to. And some people suggest that this is how things should be, which is an interesting point. Whether you agree or disagree about the morals of it, it'll remain marginal compared with the amounts transferred via centralized entities for reasons listed above. In particular, this is incompatible with your 4.:

> 4) stablecoin on/off-ramps to integration with the traditional financial system must be widely available, and 5) stablecoins in a variety of popular global currencies must be available and liquid.

As soon as you integrate with the traditional financial system, you have the same legal requirements. But as explained above, skirting regulations is actually the only one thing that you could do more easily with Ethereum. Once you've accepted to deal with the law, you're better off using centralized platforms all the way. If I have EUR and want to send you USD legally, why would I go through USDT or whatever blockchain token and pay higher fees?

In this space, there's still very little in terms of products with actual impact, to the point that it's hard to tell what will be left once (if ever) the noise from the blockchain-related scams disappears.

I was debating these points 5 years ago already. The fundamental problems I'm mentioning now were already there (the decentralization of a blockchain-based system breaking at its boundaries with the real-world, the oracle problem). The hype has evolved, but retains the same fundamental flaws.
And before that, he and his brother built an early precursor to Google Maps.
New Desktop Synth, Prismatic Spray, Offers Knobby Control of Bytebeat Synthesis
Some of the legacy code I have to debug makes me wonder if someone already had a GPT 5 years ago... Seriously - it's alien code - at the very least this person doesn't think like me at all.
This works in DF also, and with the addition of burrows you don't even have to worry about dwarves accidentally going outside when they shouldn't.
> But "modern cmake" is sort of a joke syntactically. Generator expressions are indecipherable.

Yeah. CMake works, it can do everything you want somehow, but it's a total mess, and the documentation isn't great.

Just a simple wrapper API (like libcurl-easy, for example) would go a long way.
The argument here is that Apple's design of IOS was negligent as it failed to protect from stalking.
The book Arithmetic by Paul Lockart from 2017 is about number systems, calculation methods, and devices from several historical periods and cultures, including
Egypt, Rome, China, Japan, India and Europe.
Why is no one asking? LOL pretty much everyone knows the answer but won't say it. The reason is that those who are supposed to ask the questions would open a pandora's box of their own shiz and dealings. So they prefer to pretend it never happened...
If we don't talk about it, then it never happened is it not so?
Pressurized airplanes have air changes per hour in the 12-16 range. That's above the ASHRAE recommended 6-12 air changes per hour for places that may contain viruses. (Obviously, ASHRAE isn't the CDC or healthcare organization directly, but they do know a few things about standards setting for HVAC.) Excellent filtration isn't as relevant when the average air molecule is in the aircraft for only 5-10 minutes.

The standard for AC/H for offices is 3-4.
i tried spleeter already and while it works "ok" in the best case, this sounds like a game changer if true:
https://youtu.be/e_SW1AeCQNU
...I still prefer it that boring silver.

I mean I hate it, I just hate boring silver more
Is the ChatGPT sample code/tutorials much better than the tutorials that can be found on Google?
Sorry. Didn't mean to.

I suspect we'll be in that space in about 10 years or so, when being next to a good hospital with excellent geriatric services will be more important than having trees to climb.
I suppose it depends on the questionnaire that was sent out. Sounds like survivor bias might come into play. Was the questionnaire about dying from a university buffet?
They say it supports millions of songs so I doubt that’s how they are doing this.

They are likely using a sophisticated ML version of what old karaoke machines did, and removing the vocals in real-time.
A journey through our database UI design
Apple services sometimes seem incongruent because they are. Other times they're experiments (which can and do fail), or windows into far larger projects. For example, QuickTime for Windows 3.0 was a product of porting significant chunks of pre-NeXT MacOS to x86¹, which was eventually leveraged for Carbon².

¹ http://preserve.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.17/17.01/20... ² https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_(API)
Any paint job that doesn't reflect multiple agonizingly-bright pinpoints of sunlight into my eyeballs is fine by me.

Down with the flake, in with the putty. Matte finishes are the best thing to happen to cars since the assembly line.
It's the deepest rabbit hole I've ever found and there's tons of receipts. The mafia actually formed something called The Commission which was basically their own Congress.
Astounding amount of semi investments. $500B in this list alone https://semiengineering.com/where-all-the-semiconductor-inve...
It's hard for me to imagine they'd do something special to support "millions of songs" while excluding others, since the entire catalog is ~100m songs.

My guess is that it's entirely dynamic. It's hard to imagine the complexity of doing batch processing to render each song in the library, and maintain that as new songs are uploaded, and update the renders for software improvements. Better to just do it realtime.

And since classical, instrumentals, esoteric ambient stuff, death metal, etc, will probably not be supported by the algorithms, I think the "millions" refers to those that can be processed in realtime.
initiative.sh is a context-driven web-based command line for D&D game masters. I approached development as my day job, devoting about 6 months of full-time work to this project. That's no longer a development cadence I can sustain, although I still plan to be an active maintainer and contributor.

By popular demand, or at least popular inquiry, I've decided to open-source the project at its current state. It's useful in its current state (I used it every week as GM), but some of the really cool features lie on the horizon. I'm now inviting contributors to help me make that a reality.

Previous submission: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29106581
Arizona paid them more in subsidies than the other states would
https://www.bitchute.com/video/89fmBGxz9mks/

Edit: this is the tip of the iceberg, if you really want to go down the rabbit hole...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQTyj0g3m_E
Is it? I've never taken karaoke to mean covers. Often it is the original soundtrack with the vocals suppressed (sometimes well via remastering and sometimes poorly with an equalizer).

To me karaoke is just signing to music, which is exactly what this is. I found it very strange that they avoided that word.
The absolutely atrocious current cmake language (where you can't even make a list of strings! The ONE THING a make replacement should fix!), in combination with the prevalence of legacy cmake everywhere (even in Find*.cmake files distributed by cmake!), are the two primary reasons why I'm using and rooting for Meson over CMake.

But its biggest issue, arguably, is the extreme proliferation of bad information. Everything on StackOverflow and similar sites is outdated and bad practice for the most part. You're right that introducing a new language which deprecates the old will make this an even bigger issue.
She is the One.
It was pretty clear that Apple was going to phase out Lightning in favor of USB-C at some point. The only question is at what point given that it was going to be something of a slight negative for existing customers--but that's less true today with USB-C increasingly widespread.
I think a neural net would be an overkill here. If you are doing the mixing on device, I think the algorithm could be as simple as just overlaying two tracks.

Splitting tracks on-device would probably use a neural net, but I don't think they're doing that.
Problems can often be solved far better, and with far less threat of violence or use of force, when solutions are persued via means of education instead of censorship.
1. It doesn't sound like the extra animal suffering is actually helping their odds, it sounds like if anything it's going to reduce customer trust in Musk's ability to implant electronics in their brain without killing them.

2. It's possible to do this research without this extreme level of reckless testing on live animals.

3. It's not clear that Neuralink's approach will actually be better for society in the long-term. Musk's policies towards consumer freedom and privacy in every single one of his businesses he's been a part of from Paypal to Tesla has been atrocious; I would prefer another company that's not owned by Musk build neural implants because I don't trust Musk not to screw the people who are getting the implants.

The correct questions here are:

- Will sacrificing 1,500 animals actually increase Neuralink's odds of doubling the quality of life for paralyzed people in 20 years by 1%? I don't think it will.

- Will other companies be able to produce the same results in 20 years without that suffering? Probably, yes. Nueralink is not the only company researching this.

- Do we want Neuralink to "win" the market of neural implants in the first place? I would argue that we probably don't, the best-case scenario for neural implants would be if they came out of an Open ecosystem in cooperation with more traditional companies who have less of a startup/move-fast-and-break-things vibe.

- Is the sacrifice that Neuralink wants to make generalizable as a moral principle? No, we know what it looks like when animal testing is deregulated, and it looks awful, and Musk shouldn't be given a special pass on those rules.

The problem with doing quick math on whether suffering is "worth it" is that it can be used to shut conversations about how to get the same outcomes with less suffering. It's an argument that's been in play basically ever since activism around animal testing began, and repeatedly, the people who argue "it's worth it to save everyone" have been proven wrong -- both because it's been repeatedly proven that we can do the same testing without Musk's extreme level of disregard for animal life, and because the outcomes very often turn out to be over-exaggerated or gloss over serious caveats. People are very bad at estimating the odds of success of a venture, and very bad at estimating what the potential benefits or downsides of an outcome will be, and so animal testing without moral boundaries tends to lead towards people killing a bunch of animals for no good reason.

In practice, saying "anything goes as long as the research is important enough" hasn't really born out well morally, so it's good for us to have standards that apply to everyone, regardless of what they are working on or how important they think the project is.
Now if only people in USA had courage to stand up and start prosecuting those behind drone strikes and invasions of Iraq and Afganistan.
And the open source fork ingnomia
ChatGPT probably makes stack overflow unecessesary, I can see why they don't like it.
>>What we know about the real world tells us that the answers are probably "yes", "no", and "nothing criminal".

your real world does not match mine, because in my world corp execs routinely ignore the advice of engineers, administrators, and developers when it comes to things like Security....